Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1 - 1 of 2! ~i i~ ~ --" " !! ! '.' ' i3" ,. ., !! Oo ~I" ~~ " ;1~ l " • I 1 Iii, _! • i i;;;cc:.c;4=ait;_~; 10tc)~l!~---\1//1;·~ ±l±Hcl-,lf' ! ~;~>- _,-' t?J~ft !ii i ;~_:_:_:_Ji/~ •1 1, ·! !- !5 :.l ~ !! . ' ~It: .. ' -:hd 0 ,_ 5 ~ w ! i ~ ., I ::a ' w ~ E E ~ w b X X QC ~ .. ~ j, !, ,, " ~~ g: Ii 'o " " ~::I " ~i ':.,." .: ~~ ~~ . " ;~ i: l• " ;1 ii " t" , .. , ti ~!! ' w ~ ~ " w ~ " ~ e: ~ < ~ i ' n ' ! q l ! I l ' 5 l <> ~ N ~ ! • ,o 111; i '.:a i ! 'Ii!! 0 " ;;; i ! fl I >-i I ! i ~ r ' I ~ ! ! • .., >-~ ~ ! > ' ' " • ; 0 i " N ' -I ! • ! w ! -' ' i - ~ I I ! I ! 0 ! w ! ! X I I I [a I ! • I .i i i ' ' ! I ~ s ' • ' ' ' ' ' ' I ! ! • !i1 ! l ! ! ! j i3 ~ ! -& - ©--- ©--- - ©--- ©--- - ®---- - -- I I Ii ' 11 i i i i ! i ! ' ~ i I 111 ' ~~ :;i ! I g " j !~ ~ s~ ~ el L~ ' d g~ ~~ ~ i 3 • I i ! l :;i ~ ~ij :.i . • ,. • ·1 I : II I I !! !g i~ ~§ §~ 1,: ! I o 1i, 11 ;i ·: •, :j i i !I ! i i If !~ ~~ ~11 'ii~ ~II "-" ............ ""' ' -~ .: ..; ~ ! i • i ' I ! j ! i l ' ' ~ T d " !I! l ~ ~ .o-... .o-,oi: ,o-,o, .o ·"' 1r ~.~ -.-p:;. I I i ' ' ' Ui ! !! .. ';: ~ ~ Cl) I:! I:! I:! Cl • ;; ;;: :.:: ...... ;; ~ ~ ~ ,c ;J ::: ;J ~ ~ ~: ! " § § ~ ~ ~ ~ w lL ,._ ,._ Q ~ i I ~ ! 5!l ' ....... .'1-,U i ' I ' i i I .,-... ' I ' - ,_ ••JSn• """" --=>-Z-= ~~1 -YSMTCHV-~~ -~~~:;:, I '""'""'""" ff\"~'":l ~~~J, ~ ... <ip <ip Cip ~ <ip ~ ,,,..,. s,•-,,• S4'--<l' .. '-<>' ,,._,,. I f---21·-,,• ~1·--0· I 21•-,,• I .,,-,,· ... ..,,. 01·-o· I .,,_,,. .. .•. I I I ~I I i I !i I ' ,. i ' i I i i ' 1~ ,i i ;I ! :0 gJ;! i !i i ;i I Ir ii I ~i i i; i i Ji i ,I . ·1 1: ~ .. i ,,o I i i 'I i L _ _ l i L_ j 1:;: l ~ """ 81" '" i tj. " il-'·~·12·-o· ' ' : -Tif11~i ·-t----t-·~'-- _..,1 P~.::e. ·. ··1i~-~-~~IB~ •. r ".· . t'"'·1 r--·-·1 --'l'T .. I ·1 . ·1 -'1] ,· ill >< ! I •. ,,,.. . • !'.i' ·1 • ~,· ,,,,;,1 ' ID1J]j_~~ . I ' -, --. ---+-~-,--1---1-=:Je.:1 ),:::':; 'f 1·-,··· ,._... __ !_ •. _!,;.,,._ ! i i ~-i 1tr --{:*i=-c -ct-c::-@1mt ~-+--+-?m1~~;.fbi-i · . ~...1l", ! ' ! ' ,.,.,,. j , , "1''"· • • , j , , . :l""i I '! ic·"'c,_ 1 -.---: i, --~---.-'i'rA,;c .. l!',~j t't ' ·-·-.--3-,--+-1.---1---+.-·-·-.'f.c1l'.""'. ' U'-<I" r,;--. --r--·-·-·>-·-· ·•---·~·-·-·--t--·a,J -' :l1" 1 I i t I I I "•§ ft""-= t:: "'-''-"'-"J,'-A...._. I n I D--o3C17 I I l'-'l l'-0" I ' ; • • , TYl'I II . ' -ir-----· ------CJ-.e ? I I . --·-·r---·-·t·-~~rm I-v~ I ,,,..,. I w-o• I ,,·-o· ir-o• ,. _,,. , ~ '!.•--'-c£" !!, I'' ii -. ---! MATCH LINE ( 230kV SIDE l ( 115kV SIDE l I l ,~o GAAP~.J;,.scALE '° REMOVAL DRAWING PHASE 1-WO# 108094887 PHASE 2-WO# 108094888 ............. ,..,,,.,,.,.._.,,11011i,1, iWi.\~ ... ,3:,.t"' ...,-,NEE• RE¥1EIEO s.-µ: ,_, H>n•<IUDJ"II '"''""'\I, .• ~' FQUNQATION SCHEDULE NOTE: SilC-:11<1, >HT 1 """ c-.•1Y•ou .. ,·1CJ< SC>tl".OULE, NOTES: flll...CATl<>IS S"-'LL "" PLOCED rn FlRW 5"11, "' C[U'•CTISn Slll\.CTlll"'-"Ll All ..-;w •OJIOl.T!C' ELr.oTl°"' '"..._L ,,.re,, "'"'"' F'tlU<O.\TIC..S, .-.,Ess OTHl:lnlSE ,aru,. <D~TE SIIIEIIGTH SHALL OE t'< •JDOC PSI <W!Ml. ""'"'""'"" "'"' ,..,, ",....., ~. •, • •o "'· REFERENC£ DRAWINGS: o~,H T,:U,D•Tlc»I F',..H 1JD .. SW!"CKTAAO D·l'67 r,:u,o,r1ct< Pl."' 11'<Y :Wl"CHYAAO D·l&lC STRUC"JRAI. "'-"' 2"u S•!"CHUllll ~ {,.~;. :u: :,;,: :u, = ~ .. ,;, ·.:r-:+~-=~ ~:.= ; ::. 1~;~~· €) KEY PLAN FOUNDATION REMOVAL PLAN 230KV SWITCHYARD TALBOT HILL SUBSTATION ™ EN(ll~lNCl H867R •=I_,.,..~ -OEl'lfflJEHT =•1"• w•-c• 6 -·-~ ,,.,.,,,.,._ .. ,._ =---,---~---§ ; I I ~ [ill !I ,00·><11 ,OO'OL ,OO'OI ----·· ................... ·0 • • 1. 1. ~: ~= ,oo·•• ,o;;•u ,oo•n ,oa·~, .oo·n i!!HH!!i '"'"' w u z w ~ 0 ~ z C ~ u ~ i= ~ z C u \/ ~ -~ _..,-;/ g~~ ./ =i2"-.; 'l"~~ ... ~;1~ r;:j-T ' ' ' ' l G_IJ l ' ' ' ' 1 :~ ___ : ~ •h ' 'Ii 1, l! ! !I 1111111 1i l!l 111 11111 I 111 11 ;,uH~h ! 111 Ill I! I m. LI HI 1 ! I ! d i !! II I I fti T",.,.~ +eel a: 0 · •• D -, l 'I I ' l'I ' ... 0HOf ~ w w z ~ w w ~ RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE CONCRETE HANDLING SH 5>1HT1 I N 0 //?0fi-' ui<s" / k~ "' CRAPl;tJ_;,.,~CALE -------------------- ¢---l:l _...,.,_ <>:, -.. __ ,_, /------- ~ + . ____ , 'I-, ____ _ .Q ---0 ---a~..,...., • D D ,,, LEGENO: Ill@ -= ::UARl•o LIW!H/HCQl ,m&ILIT"I' ""'" 5!CT'!:11Ct REFERENCE DRAWINGS o--•0110 SJTI'c,rclJl~OC"""-NOUS ""''""" .. ''"'"'"""'-'" <<IJl<OUl'l• "-AN •n,cc,......_.._.,. ~ CALL BEFOOE YOO DIG tal I: TCU FREE 1-800-.\24-555~ '""""'"'""'"""''lmaiiiill,11,<rin!I TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN-ACCESS ROAD TAL60T HILL SUBSTATION /I 151/, iii ~,·:-:..T,.I:::.::~ SUBSTATIOH E•rn•u•uo:: DEF'ARTIEKT "-'"•'1TE D-~732 I a ' .. ~ :: ~' ' < ~ ~" I >-9~ w 0 w u z w ~ ~ c; '" ' m ,, "' ii > ~ ~ 0 ~ i· I ~~ 1~ I NN <- T 0 0 z~ z o-0 11 a.< a. >->->-w zo zz 'II"' ',!19 -w ->- ""' OU w-WW "'"' "'"' "' z 9 >-< u ~ u w a. "' "' 0 "' z < 0 0 ;'. z ~N < < >- ~ "' ~ < w ~->-u "' z z < ' -z ~ w i 0 >-< z z >-< ;; C w z ~ 0 s 0 ;;; 0 l z w < • 0 w u z w ~ >- " "' u.m1t I ~ PSE PUGET SOUND ENERGY TALBOT HILL SUBSTATION 230KV S\VITCHYARD SEY, SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. LEGAL DESCRlPTION PARCEL "20.,,,,---,,,,,, sw',, OF "'''• LESS PORLl "" PSP.U. co ,o FT ,, ••• ""' ,oo f! ESMT "" '"' PM wirer•"'"'-co 100" S•MFcETO• "'" s,~, •o <surs rco "-ea, PARC£1. "202lo5-'J<lli,: f'ffi Of s,•,, C' "'''< Lr "'-, Of C a, S eLn LN S/W OLSO Pu• '" SOOlll t Y NC, % ~~~\"_"'.:,!~~·i\i' TRIJ<"S LH ,sMT ,, •• '",,Ca, s PIPE'""'" SL•BJ SITE 01.TI., SURVEY NOTES fllOPW 9' '"IS S RYfY THCS ,c•a,e, O.S '""''"'" IH MJCUST '"" SCPT,,<l<:R 201' •HO 01'100,R, ,o,s ,S SU .. ORI 0, A PCGCT SC\JNO E•tRO( SUllSTAICON ueo,,o, PRO.Ji:Cf. RVirs PF ,uac•o WASHt•o'ON C!Xlf'iOOlN>T( SYSlfM. HUR1' >O.e. NC:Ol INSHS ,011). ~ "'""" ~:;;~~ •• :'~a:la~ :'.~~/' MIHIJS >.S'. -CCHPSCOH ma WINnnw, '"''"'"''"' Sllf M•C'"'"'S OH CUSIRI>.. "·1'HT HO. 500<. A'•{ REOUi WIIH "DEA CONTROL" CO" H TH' ,,...,. IHTO THC Soa>r.TJOH. lS" sa•·• '"OH POO'[R PCCC '17>lS/iSS,SO. El,V M 43' ... HE!. ~\!, n~'.':.',, ·;~~T."~id."':c.~c::'~.~t~L .~' ,;?'~,;~T~~ 1·~~\~-'~.;:~. '·t:f; -.,, .• , "" \U!!Ql.lli..lli'..: "'" "'"'JS[)CNTS FOR TIHS '"""" "'" '"'"'"''° USlHG. LETCA "''"'""'STATION. lCIC• eao SCANS1'TID'I ,so lElCA GS U OPS"'"""' ••ts SURl'!:Y CO'l'l"S 'fl> 1'E "CHlUJW arnUIR,O .,.,o, o• '""'""'" a, 1:10.000 '"" """"''"" '"" """" OOJOOCHATES" "' '"''" "" •• ,.,. '"·1)0·090 ""o POSIIIOO<Al Tili.ER;NC. "''''<;;LESS Ttt>H o.ol\ "'"'" ./ /', / I 1 1"\ . r· -=-z-= // ~I: \ / ! // // / /\,. i~}}fa~~-",.:~ 11 . Ii AREA PLAN SURVEY NOTES (CONTlNLJEDI ~ 'HIS I$""', eo,mo,a, SURVEY. PSOP'"" '"" "'"' H•SEON '"' "'"""'"",,,ore, '"''""LE PUBLIC •Ecor>os roxrn,rn w,1, coc., ""''""·" •:,_, '""...,: '"""" ,o, ""'"" 0UHPQS,S -Y. """"'""COONER$"'"''"' s•.sco "co;,u,CTLON """ '"" '"'""· "".JNl'<l!I Vl5IUU>!i "" >U""' '"'""'"'"" AMO 01"£S '"""' """" "''"" •<ia[OH "'"' \'ISIJ[O ouo1,c o,co,arn. "'"" uN«SS OT><CR•.s• CMO[CATEO -CIIJCAilO TIRE CMSURAHCE COMPANY eLAT CFRTl"lC"E ,..SO >OO, USCO FOOL""" OESCRLPTLOH ,No EHCLO.OlOANCCS or RECORD. "" FcRTHER '""< i,•c 'H> .,,ooo ••s aEOUESUO o, "'"'"""'D NQfRQl'Q!lliQ III' II'fi UNOESCllOJl<O Uf<L!T"S SHOWN "'""'"HT flCLC 5''" ••o "'LNT MAR<$ AS PLAC(O OH THE CROUNO a,• ""'""' UlLITE> ,oc,rc ""'''" TOGETHER •IT<"' LOSLS UTIClTY AS--llUllT '"" "''"'"" o,,.,.o,, Nn CLl>R'"TE' IS lllOE TH>T '"' uNo,acao,,-o ,·:cc· CS S<Cf11'1 CO..,RJS1' "' sue• C'TIUlrES 1" •,c ,a,,. £JrH£R IH S<R<!CE ""ARAHOON,O OR 1"H TH[ .,as, a~JNO U'lllTlES ME SH"""'" TH>L, ""T COCAT]()'J. '"' UTlllllES '"' SHOWN AS .ccu,AT,t, » ,css·ac ,aa, '""'"" IHl"C,, ... 110• 10.c;QMIJlnR IHTERY'I 11.$1B'!fflHCF fQNQIJIPNS ,oo=acc CONDITIONS lfl:"C NOl (M.C.CO C, COa5'Q,:SCO ,s eAHT OF T•IS SUS\'D, ''·= "'ST 0€ CALLCO MOT LCSS 1"AS <e HOC'" "'""( ac;,SNINC C<C><>TION ""'"" '"' """'"GROUNO Ufll<1CCS ,., ,C .o,,Tso. ,'1LUHf TO 00 "1 COULD"''" D£AHiHC "'"'"""" """ cos.s ,u, ,o '"'El r1,:s M: cosr o, REP.CPS ru THr ,m,,cEJ. GENERAL NOTES >LL Mh!£Rl,tS AH1> "'"''"'NSkrP SSAll SE IN OCCORC,,C[ '"" Tl<(; OE()UISE..,HTS 0, me c,Ttsr STATE or ~ASSCHCTON o,PARTME'1 "' '"""""""" S!I.NQAl)O '"'"'""""'" f(IP ao,.o ANO BRIDGE "'"""''CTJO, '"' .,.,. CITUCOIJIU, POOUC '"'" '"''""""' UHl>SS 0'"'"""' N01'0 rT •Ill at Ti<C CDNTRACTOO'S RESPOHSCBILIT, TO"'""" •LL UT1L1T, '"'""'""' 10 COOROJNUE (OIISTPUCTION, All UIClCT, RtLOC.TlDN .OS< s,,11 RF AT T"' HPENSS OF '"' "'""11CAHI AHO !&JS,"' '" ,,co•o,ec, "'" lH( ST•so,eos "' "" CIIUCUUH1'. 8U•lEO UTILITl[S >RE: St<O•N CN ft<ELR APPRO>lM'1' LOCHION. TH' C<:><laACTM SHALL .. .,. !HF"""""""""" o, 'HE ""'"D "ro,1 rn '"' """"""'"°"· >NY Rt·,i$10..S TO TKESE PLANS ..,s, e, "'""''" '"' ""00,SO OY !H( CIT>JCOlJN1' O(VcLO-tHEt,,;IN((RCNGSCCTCOHParn,·e,.· 1MPc,'"'""""HlHlHEFIElO A COPY (I. IH>Sl APPROV,O PLANS MIJSl a, C• 'HC JC! $IT( ""'""'" 00HSlROC'10H lS INPflOOSESS. ""°"' -'IHC IH lHE CCTSICOUH1' alCHl OC"·•"· 1<;: CCNTR.CTUR Sl<AII, A. OSlAIH A CEHER<L -,,u,r FROU !Hf Cfl"C"1'"· a. SIISMII A fl"AHCCAL CUASAHU, TO TH, Cll,,CCJ'I' ·a '"""' SUISfACTC,,l '°""l'"°""''"''"''" C. S!i(l"/10! PROO" OF lCASCUl' IHSua,k(C 1,-' ,~,· S£0UIR,O SY IH> CITY/COUNTY. TH, C"'4fflACTOf\ $11,Cl NOTCe, THE APPLIC"T'S E,OJMC>.a IN TH[ El'CHT M OCS(OV"> o, PIDi SOllS. "'""'"C tSOUNO•UEA. OR SC•.O( ):SCStP,N(:1" ,.,,.. SOIi LOC OtSCfllPTIOHS AS HUr<O ON i>,S, PLAkS, '""''"'Of;, '"' O[V[LOet,l(Hl "'""" ,, '" c;,•,cc,JNn nn,s HOT''"'" a• 110Nlr¥ 1H'1 '"' PRl>'OS,O -· CO ... Lr,S .CTH "' accu:OCl,I("" Of OR 1' "'·""'""'OTHER 0001NmC£S, RECULAtill,IS. OR R,Oll["tJF:OTS. OR s,,,e On ff:DCR'l "'"'· CONTR.eT"" WILL ,econ s<1.E """""""""' '"" u,eiur, •o, ,c..,u,acc •ira All 5TATL ""'"· '" LOC.l "'-".El. REOUIR[Ht::HIS, LA_,, ORO,-ONCCS, '"' S£GUCH10HS, TH£ C'1l!COUMTY IS AUfSORfZ>O TO"'" ,-s,,c·co-,s ANO !A,C SUCH ACT!ilHS AS ,£<)l/lRIO Ta curlla<£ '""' RECULAlCONS. '"' CIT"'"'·'·· "'"""'""""1: $ttAU rets[MT ""'" CREDSMTIALS ANO""'' A OCASONACLC ,FFORT •c cc,,•,cT TH, PR(>'SRr, °""'" a,,ooc '"'"IMC, (1'HO PSIVAl' PROI''"" ,.,. SIIOUlO '"' C!TY/COUHTl """"' ,w,,, I~ rn,a:,:cas THU LHVALIOATC 11<[ "'""'"L """" o,a US(O TO OOUCN "'' "'""" "" OET""'" ·,.r 'HS APJ>LlCJ.Hf IS WOT COl<f'L·i•O """ lH' CIH)IIIONS (IF '"' P<RMCT OR APPRo,c; '"""· ,;;; CITrtC(>JHi, '"" "'""'' THE """"'· "'™" AHO.'ilra '"'"" WOR< STOFP,O OH TH[ """" 'HCY "'' ru:oo,a, '"' APPC:C.Nl 10 fl(,UO•Jr IHrl)f< ... TCON OR PLAHS roe R[,i(W ASJ '"'O''l •NO •Pl'U FOO A H[W rCR•JT -._.J ..... ~ ~c @ ,i,· s if(•. ,.,_., SITE , m:'I c>e:W °'' \:.: \ • I-) .\-', \ -.~ . ] -1 I '.', \ ,rr< ~ ·-· " , . ~ ,v ", r--i-···" ,t. ~!\L ::-lr-{ t:;~!P,I: \ -,r:,//r-, (/ ::r · <LLU 1j \ ),-:J_ I I ( I : IRENTON~ DRAWING LIST: ~a.til...!,QjI.:.IJ...: 0·28 '" 0-28 '" 0-2• 1" 0-28 OR 0-18 JO 0·18 l1 o-,an, o ,an, 0-187JS 0-187J7 0·187l! o-rnTl• 0·1S7<6 ""°"" rDUNOAT1:N a,~c,AO PIAS' ',HEET 1 "' F"OUNOATICN "'MO•Al eu,· '"'" 'cc FDUHOATl"N REMGVAl "L>' SHaET ! c· STAUClUH•L HC~C.Al P"' Sill PU, ANO G<:NrnAL ,01ES TOPOG~AP·I IC sua,u Sil(CT ' CF ' TDrOGOAPSIC SuR,EY SHF'T? o, s TOPOGRAPSIC S<1S,Fy SHf[T Ju, C TOPOGRAPHIC $URV[Y ~"c,r. Of ' IDPOCace.rc ,uw,u SH[ET ; OF 5 "'""C"'" lHUSLON!SEOIVEW cc,rnc. '""-Zl"" s~r1c11•,no "'""cssa• EROSl~"'"OIV(N' CO"RC" '"N-AC:ESS RC•O Tct.ll'CRAR· [R0510N!~ED[t,lrn· cc,rnc "'"' s aa,o:NG ,.o ,ENCINO PLAM l'O<, S.ITC-v,a;, G'lAO:HG •ND FfNC[NC PLAN "1SKV ,o[lC·YlRC GOAO:MG SFC-<nNS "'" U,r>CLS •CCfSS R~AU "l" SHEET 1 CF 2 •CC£% HJAO PlA' SHEET 2 CF 2 U<,JNAG( P\.·" o,,1s.cc SECT1c,s ••D :ET•ILS OETENTIO, PCND >LAN OcT(NTIC, PONO SEC'[QNS "'O 0'T>I.~ FOUNOH/ON PLAN SHf'l 1 o,· < F"OUNOATl~N Pl.AN SHEEl , U> 2 S'RUCTlttl'L PLAN ,Hlcl 1 OF ;: STRUCliPfi'L PLAN S"E:ET < OF 2 •ISUOL "'"R[EP. 'L"NTIN(; rem St<[[' , cc< V:SUOL a•RR[ER 'lANTINO PLAN St<([c, Gr< V.SUOL a•RR!EP. 'l;NTINO PLAH SH£(T 1 CF < ,:suAL B•RR:rn 'LANTINC """ '""' ' ~, " PSE ENGJNEERING CONTACT$ >S, '101" ,,c H(, ""L"US WA. "00< .,:;,",':.'c'J.,'HT I MOCL y "'" ,,,_,.,_,.,, I ""''" "-•0 •»•· ::,, """'"" I """" '''"' .,,.,,,.,.,, I a,, ..... ,~""""'"·'~ CHP[S ALISSFI" <,S-'&t·SS2' I 0"'"1 >'<>>'oc. """"' '"'""· """ ~t··~-;;;-;:~, ,,, ... ,.,. .. j ee,:,.,o,,: .. o,o CC«" co,,roa,, I "'° re .,,.,,,.,,., ! yu·,. •"·-,,so.cc,, , ......... , 1,crr..;c,,," ,,,.,.,.,.,<_} I•"·=~"''"'""'"""" I® CALL BEFORE "-YOU D!G Co 11 , TDLL fR£S 1-_!Q__0_::-424-5555_ SITE PLAN AND GENERAL NOTES 230KV SWITCHYARD TALBOT HILL SUBSTATION suaSTATLOH GRAP,~l"C"t:CALE t:J./?vH~P. }I II'/?/( •= 'oNe'~'."N.!~'r" D-18730 ;'""'' G ccm·sm ,, '~'l<,I"'""'''"""" -----x"E'u, IIJ 'I I :11IJ:1tl1,,11111: J:11 IIIIJ:lllilllJ:1111 IIIIJllllllllll 1111~11~1,·~~11)l1o~ti11 llhllllb~h~}~\~1oblt • !g ! !! i! ,, ! ! ~ :::::I:::::::;\!:::::.:!!!!!!! .... ~ illllllllll lllllllllllllllll~~)l!IIUIII, l I lllllll!llnlllllll!ll'l!l!llll I lllllllk~lllllllllllllllllll!!llllllllll\!llllll:.llllllllrllllllllllllllllllllll~llJI ;~~~""""~~"~~~11~~Hd~ .. ~. 11111111),h)~llllllllH~ ~ hH°:hl!Hh!tll ,.,."!hhH,. ..... ~~~lti, .... h1,,. ...... h~~!n !l••••l!••l•ll!l!ll!ll!I il!!!f!E!!E!E!! 11j1l11j1111•1111111111111111l!l!!l!!!!!••ili! 1mmm11mmmm 1111m1mmm I mmmmmmm11mm11 1mm1111m1 ! 11 j ~ 11111 ! I i ! 11 ! ! ! I ! i i j I I 111 i 11 111 I I I a 'I' :- I; ·" ji! >-z 1~· ~i ~o ~F 0 ,0;; ~< ~~ ~ uro !p @[ ~ .'/f ~Dl ' <~ :i1 ~ ~o ,.! d ;/ 8"1 ~< :<~ Iii d • ,: ; i! ' . " ., ~' ' 1l = " ' ' ' ii II \ \ 1h11 ' ' \ 1§d1 l'l ' ' ' .. ,., ~ ' ' ' ' ·, ' I \ ' ·, ' ' .. ' ' ·, ,. ' J. ' ' \ { ,· ' ' ·, .,. ' . --------~---\ \ ' ' ' ' ' \ \ ' ' \ \ ' \ ' ' ' \ .,I .. m -~ m ' , I '· \ \ ' ~- \ ' ' ' \ ' \ ' ' ' __________ _,_ ___ __;_ __ _ \ "' ' \ i \ /) 'i \ . ' ' \ \ ' -, ' \ \ ' ' ' ' ' : I . j' \ 19:7 i' I ' ' .j -~--- \ \ \ ' \ ' \ \ \ ' =6 of \ ' \ ' 0 \ ' o: ' ' ~ ii! gm :f \ ' \ \ ' ' -, • ,- ! i } LOWER PLATE l BOLT PATIERN DETAL t I I f 3E -BAY 3 ELEVATION VIEW LOOKtKl EAST 2E-BAY2 ELEVATION VEW LOOKNGEAST E -BAY1 8..EVATION V,EW LOOKING EAST ,w ~ -1-0 ' 0 ':~ : 0-c'J rD .!I '" [ [ C BAY3 PLAN VE!N il c_ OOTANCE_ ffiOM CENTt.ERLtE ______ Jj L-4.~ I 4m 'I'-™"'""""" HOLDING MID-POINT l£RE AND . SCIU™ERLYMID-.f'Ol<IT4TBAY1 [ _____ -_-__ "" -----~-_I ______ -_-_-c_•,c --------,J BAY2 PLAN 'IIEW f" C-~--~-':".:"ANCE_l'iK>M cem.EfiUIE ---11 ~ l ~ DIMENSIOHS~OISTANCE BETWEEN l,INER FT OF LOWER Pl.ATE ~r------------_-_-.,, ---~----------- 1 ------~----,.., -----------1\ BAY1 PLANVB/ 'I OISTANCE FROM CENTLEFLtE I: r~----------------------------------_-_--_-_c~---.!1 3.98' I 4.11' CENJERLl,IE ESTAlll.l8HED HOL.DINIJ MJD,POINT KERE AND N()1{1"}1ERI.YMO-¥Cllm ATBAY3 i-----•B ,B ~(_.,,_-_-_______________________ ------------------,, ,, J J : --0.1, .. ~ lYI': dFJQ 0----: 0 -"""""" PLATE D1M5NS10NS SHOULD BE VERFIED PRIOR TO MltTAI.. FAl!RICATION LOWERF'I.ATE Oll,ENSIONS SHOWN IN ELEVATION DETALS ME FROM TIUS POINT l ,i)Ji r '" O =·, ' ' ' ' ' ' -0 1 ·r , -~~ ------0 I~ DlillENSIONS BIKIWN IH B.EV.0,TION DETAILS ARE FROMlHIS POINT lFPEA PLATE BOLT PATTERN DETAIL • CAVIO .VAN9 .-A9.00IAT•• •-~ ... _,,.,_.. [NOO<rul -~~·· .. ,,.,,.., -OITT 3"-BAY3 ELEVATION veH LOOKNCl WEST :Ni-BAY2 8..EVATION V,EW LOOl<ING WEST 1W-BAY1 ELEVATION VIEW LOOKING WEST fl " :: ==:.:=: i PSE STANDARDS '""" ,OOC ~·~~tMi" ~1·~-'-"°"Ct< •= """' ,·-20"-0" ,11,(,<J""""""-"''"'!OC'"' , __ 6 i . I fiit!:: -+~'II ~------1,-- <ii '"' "'' i ·: ,_:_, iii L,] r_-_; __ j I r- ,_~: l " i -----·· L-Jt '"-~ ~; ; : --F"-+<'I c_-J §~ l o,:; ~; ~!ii i.!l --,Jt :i r-_-_-i i :~~ l r--, f-5 1: , __ , 'ii <>E .-~ '·" ':1l i ' ' ---------h ' ' ·----' ---'=--, : ::: : , __ :_~ _ _; ' ' I l ' ' ' I ' ~1 I '" ' ! ~ ~ ~-I ' ,' ~~ E:; ! 1! ~~ '.! ;;; ! ~§ !e i~ ~; j' I -~; ,,, "" r!j ~!5 .. ~ z 0 r u w V> ., u V> z - 0 -J ti '.;: ~ >->-' V> w a J < !c! ~ ~ >- !• ., ,! ~ < ,. l w > i "' a z JO w->>-<U ~~;] j !~ ~i i§ !, " .. '! -, ~t !'. :~ :;;~ " l, ,: ;'.l~ ' V> lo ..... ~~ J ' f5 '-" .... tr <Z ,v >-O ~a~~ w-'"' ,,~ :~ O>--~ < I'." o>-' ' <..> 8,, ZV> <~ 0 C, V> V> !;!. iL -J j!! ' >--u~ w !• j V> >- 0 u~ ZJ !!I -< , 1 O>-< • ~ " ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~L~ ' i l ' u z i5 5! ct i~ a::~ ~~ (!) ,q: 1 ia z ~~ ~u ~i :; ··1 !: no ~ g~ ~~ >- b ~g [.} ... z.: ...JIil «>-u" _o ~ ~ >- i l 'Jll ! ·, t !11 ·1 . .,. •111·1 t I I ,~It I I •l ·1··., I !i 1 1,, , jf ij '1llU I ! ii J1 }•ff 11 I' n ' ! h I", ' ! ll pm· .. ~ ~ ! !!1 I ... • • ' ' 11 ... • • ii . ' ... U! • • . ' . . . . ·.: .... I Ii !! ,-ll I ,I ,. ~~ " ... -" :! ., -, :; s. >-" w ,, 0 :! >-., V> V> < w > ~ < > w >-< 0 . ' i" " i ~,: ' ' ' I • ~ ~ ' ,, " >-ii ,l!I n " .. • v,- ~ < >-w 0 " < ,_ "' -~.'~ . el 0 ·\~'It '] §~ 0 w ~~! ;/j~~ :..:.J :"!'i >-< : .. .., "' ~;~ 0 ~ ;;: ·~· "'""'"' "' w ' ' ·-0. ,''1 IMl~!.C ., u •i! u ~~:!~ 0. it'~!'i~ V> '"'"' ,_ N 11 ~ '! ~ ~ ! ! .. ~ ~ I ii ~ > ! !!! T !i II Ii ~ ... i! .. ~ .: ;: !:: I 0 i !·!:l'i!i ~ N •!•,!!" ! f'i' L i!°Y;;i wf ,-;. d "' i t' I l" "-;-_ ~-• i ~ N,= ><~;:;•:•Mi ~ 0 !! "'Y'~ '"'1'~!)[1'~ I "' il!i> -t. · • I ~ ~ .... = "·1=·=· .. u ili'iir, r,i.~ ~ ; z .. ;r.. .. lll'T lll"N 2 ' ' ' ' ~ < ' -'· ! 1 ' ' 0 r! ! • ' z I ! ! ' ~ 0 ~ . ' ~ 1: ®' ©- ©- \ ' ' \ ' ' \ ©--- g ~ 15~. {~i ;i! f•i!i ~;~ ~·I~ ,,, fal'llli ~"'~ ~~lo ~~~ '"' d '!• ·1; ! -. i l,i ·" i~~~ j~ ~!i~ ~iE; ~ ii:!! :e::l!I ~ ' ~ti! ... -i::);!i:r; z ' -.: ,!i!~. !i ,a~ ! ~; i~""~ .. :i'.l'::I~ " ;., u~~ ~~g" < ' '-•>-w .,,. I'! ~ ' ~~ ;~!: ;ii~ 0 . ' "' ! ' r ag1~ i;B~ u ! ~ ~ :! /;l, ;,,; z q "' ' . ~ t'i !!l-'-1 gil~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ I-"'cl j";,';e~ !i ... d 0 :i .. .., .. ..,;;j wll!gw z ~ " .; I I I I ' i ! ' II I 00 \ ' w z ' i j! C 8 llc:::I=:J'---i ~ ' I~ ' 111,:,t; . / ®- w b z w ~ ~ C w i3 "' z C ... ? 10 !HS 335 3NI1 H:)!'9'~ 1:; -r·--·-··-··-··-. ; ©-- © ; ' ; ' ; ' ; ' ~ N f 1! I j! ,1 ·1 (i! L :ll ,.,;,: ;!~ •·1 ,1. i 1· ·" • o-... 1 i i ii! I .i " iii jli i! ·, Ni~ 1! •! ii .o-.,t .o-.~~ I !! !i1 !I. i!l!j i'I~ !ii :::i:!!~ _] .-.,-, .. 11 11 • . - l ' . ! ' ' ' ' ' - . - - " >,'>(/)>< . /·/, "' /' (//'i. . /' ' ,"'-,_ ·~ ' ,/ / ·,----' . / //' ,------- ././' ' -~--//' ,/ ,. /'/ ,/ / ./ // ' ·6---_i \''-< / / ( •'1 ij~ ' ' ~~ ' z ' s~ a ;:, '" u ;;~ "' ~ ~s ~ "---r ~~ ~1 -· a ., ~ I, ~ u ~ ~ >-·-J"" ~ .o-,, ' §1 /': Li- ', ', ....... I i • ' ' Ii , I w ~ r z w iii !iii .... ,0 .. ---,----- ~-:.: -. ii i . ~ .. i i~~ :: -F=+--'~-~-----;-1-: D D --«i------------------- ' '---·, 1 \ I ' I (-' 1 \1 I, 'I :1 :: ... ! j ' '0 • ' i (/--·i:~\ . \ -~,.~ j \ , ~···1~:-.4'.-... / ',_~C'Y--J'~, I , ... ., .,.,. p..,J <l ,, S,..., C<l.LM ·=· 00 .... " .. TtftTIOH' COUPLIHD ... 1' Un< .. """"'' ELl<lWl>Hl>Cf!IFICE. ~~~'.~L lH15 5H£U ~ ~ ELB0112NO ORJFICE DETA.!b CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 WITH FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAJL (:1:) Al«H<>I STRJP ~ !'""~·, .... '"_ j=' ... '""'\',/"..., .. .,,. ~ ~~ .. ~.-·.:urro iJf~;,...-:...~ ~ '"'"--~,{ .,. ~'ho:'et° ,,• fa'"'iJ 001':'r~ ~ TRASH RACK DETAIL EB ~~r:,.~~'.:.r,""'" ... -· ~:-·" lJt.L ~r~ger ;t,:."'"'W,h El 8QW/3RP QR!flCE DETAIL ~rWa'r'Lflr.CE ~ T'l'l'Elll<l"O!O ¥ OlMIS """ l"lFT\~ ~!71:F'SCALIJICtR EMERGENCY OVERFLOW STRUCTURE TYPE 2 DETAIL (1"') MIS 1 i~lt•:.,.~~Wo' :t"'~,·~;1,•HEl,CI, .. ~ ... ~, ou• w,<SO .. CAP o<>oc.r -r • .!.:..\·•,..,un ~~'"' ;MErg" :;,;. l'!('l,J'l<~loul:F "'., .. -,, "• .,._,.. ·- ' •• "'"' ~i~~.~"';':;'-:hii"• :;:;:,••<>r ~·!:•;c,~E::;,,wm, fl , , MAtlSE>!.,11·: ~E.~~i:L,m. ''""'"'...,•'' ilLAW <T!'P l PcACESI ,- / • 1 •. X l'-0" LO \ CEO .. F[•C[aO ._~ <ITP 20 PUC>.lil ~A.._I.L_,,_,,.(n PLAN VIEW Rt!.A,,.1.~. -h· m ~ I M.~~l,;,it:,'1'/~ :-m j'~~~. ~..,. rJ.Lj, t._:1<;:::..i''' T~:::"1ER Woe:';..:i~o·~~·i,"".,.~"'c" ; ;,';, j"' u tlt.Y~I ! g,~ ~~~ """"" WOOD ISOLATION FENCE DETAIL !UI.E• ..... ..,. ~ ' ' I '"''"'""'' -•l'll.CEOru:TTO CJ<IST<HO FEIOCE PO!iT, _ ... iHWOK ti' THF m~~·t~..:~~I~g <JflUTll'1.DtnHl!IC:T!'. fOOll/lOS. 2 <:Y r:z:·,a •.,,. ·;,-; HHJOT\JR.11..F!LLJ·_-; 1ffS1:_~. ~ .. 2~~v POND ACCESS DRIVEWAY DETAIL EB ..,,._,,,,,,ou,11 (!.R~",P!'( ti ~H~" DETENTION POND DETAILS TALBOT HILL SUBSTATION _+= ·~1";1~'f'.,&,c ID-1 B737 ~ ''-·'.J1..!..!±.[<>00~--· 'T~ 0 ~·r{'i'~~;;~~~i',·,,~:~{'.i¥:~~t.t11~~~*k~~~.!:l;frt,~'f~~1'tli:~1rif1'~•,::·1,!t#?1. ,1~'01!~,~1}ii1~;;p~~~ll,~~~xs~r:;;.{t;g, .. ·1~i'~i·;j Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Bob Gambill Christopher Russell PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N Seattle Public Utilities -SPU_WTR PSE Bellevue, WA 980099734 PO BOX 34018 355 110th Ave NE, E5T04W Johnjoseph Pajor 1411 Grant Ave, C204 Renton, WA 98055 Mollv Reed PSE PO Box 97034, EST03W Bellevue, WA 98004 Seattle, WA 981244018 Bellevue, WA 98004 Kerry Kriner Puget Sound Energy PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N Bellevue, WA 980099734 Kimberlv Board Woodcliffe Apartments 1205 Grant Ave S Renton, WA 98055-6057 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON Talbot Hill Substation Improvements Conditional Use Permit LUAl6-000922, ECF, SA-H, CUP-H FINAL DECISION Summary Puget Sound Energy is requesting conditional use permit and site plan review approval to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation. The applicant seeks to demolish an existing 999sfbuilding and replace it with a new l ,449sf building. The applicant will also remove substation equipment and create a new storm drainage system. The conditional use permit is approved with conditions. Testimony Angelea Weihs, Associate Planner, summarized the staff report and entered additional exhibits into the record (Ex. 17-19). She noted the City had received comment from Seattle PUD regarding access. In response to the examiner, Ms. Weihs stated the substation was in excess of 460 feet from the nearest residences and that the existing and proposed planting areas will serve as a buffer. Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager, stated the project must meet the King County Stormwater Manual. In response to the examiner, Ms. Bannwarth stated all the potential impacts from the project with respect to construction are mitigated within the City's development codes. Ms. Bannwarth stated the City would be amenable to adding a condition of approval requiring the City to set up a call number for construction related concerns. CONDITIONAL USE I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Kerry Kriner, Planner for PSE, stated the staff report is incorrect in describing the building proposed for demolition as a control house. The building is actually an oil storage building. Ms. Kriner noted PSE had originally applied for a permit in March 2016 and was told the building was exempt from the !BC and therefore did not require a permit. In September, the City of Renton required an electrical permit and then reversed the need for a building permit. In response to the examiner, Jennifer Henning, Planning Director, stated the City had not originally known the building was taller than the maximum height for an accessory structure permitted within the zone. They had originally understood the building was smaller and not as tall. The electrical permit triggered the need for a building permit. The presence of a building permit triggered a conditional use permit because of the use within the zone. Ms. Kriner stated PSE objects to the City's $200,000 frontage improvement requirement and will be submitting a request for a waiver. No modifications or variances are currently at issue. Ms. Kriner stated the applicant had submitted a landscape narrative (Ex. 20). Ms. Henning stated the value of the applicant's improvements triggered the frontage improvements. Exhibits The February 14, 2107 Staff Report Exhibits 1-16 identified at part B of the Staff Report itself were admitted into the record during the hearing. In addition, the following exhibits were admitted during the hearing. Exhibit 17 Staff PowerPoint Exhibit 18 COR Maps Exhibit 19 Google Maps Exhibit 20 Landscape Narrative (December 13, 2106) FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: I. Applicant. Puget Sound Energy. 2. Hearing. The Examiner held a hearing on the subject application on February 14, 2017 at 11 :00 am in the City of Renton Council Chambers. Substantive: 3. Project Description. Puget Sound Energy is requesting hearing examiner conditional use permit approval and site plan approval to perform improvements at the existing Talbot Hill Substation located at 2400 S. Puget Dr. The site is 50.4 acres. PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot CONDITIONAL USE 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment. The existing 999sf oil storage building I will be demolished and replaced with a l ,440sf building. The existing 230kV substation equipment will be removed, including steel structures and foundations. No additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system is proposed within the fenced area. A detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve excavation of more than 500 cubic yards of soil. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. Access to the site is provided via an existing driveway extending from Puget Drive Southeast. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The applicant proposes to construct the project in two phases. Phase one includes the civil portions of the project. This phase is proposed for April 2017 to October 2017. Phase two includes assembly of the electrical equipment which is proposed for April 2018 to October 2018. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes. The site is zoned Residential R-8 and the Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Medium Density (RMD). The site is surrounded by single family uses in the R-8 zone on the north, east and south. To the west are single-family and multi-family dwellings in the R-8 and RMF zones. 4. Adequacy of Infrastructure/Public Services. The project will be served by adequate infrastructure and public services as follows: A. Water and Sewer Service. Neither water nor sewer service is proposed or required for the redevelopment project. B. Fire and Police. Police and Fire Prevention Staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. C. Drainage. Runoff from the site sheet flows outward from the middle of the substation. There are existing drainage pipes from the northeast and southeast side of the substation which are tied to catch basins within the fence line. The rims of the catch basins are currently at an elevation higher than the surrounding ground, which prevents them from capturing stormwater. Grade differences between the substation slab and the surrounding ground surface along the north and northeast sides of the substation prevent stormwater from draining away from the substation, which tends to pond within the substation footprint. Runoff along the southern edge of the 1 The staff report refers to the structure as a control house, however, the applicant at hearing corrected the description. CONDITIONAL USE 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 substation flows into a culvert located beneath the access road which ultimately flows east towards Grant Avenue South. The applicant's Preliminary Drainage Plan and Technical Information Report (TIR) (Ex. 7) demonstrates compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the 20 IO City of Renton Amendments thereto. A new storm drainage system is proposed within the fenced area. A detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence and will involve excavation of more than 500 cubic yards of soil. Drainage improvements include a new stormwater conveyance network inside the substation which would route flows to a 75,000-cubic foot stormwater detention pond located along the southeastern edge of the substation. The pond will discharge to a depression on the southern side of the existing access road, where flow would resume the existing drainage path towards Grand Avenue South. The applicant is exempt from water quality requirements. D. Parks/Open Space. City development standards do not require any set-asides or mitigation for parks and open space for the proposed use. E. Transportation. The site is bordered by Beacon Way South to the northeast. Beacon Way South is classified as a Residential Access Road and is located within the City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline Easement. Access to the site is provided via an existing access driveway extending to Puget Drive Southeast. Puget Drive Southeast is classified as a Minor Arterial street. The existing right of way for Puget Drive Southeast is approximately I 00 feet wide and contains no frontage improvements. RMC 4-6-060 requires half street improvements including 0.5-foot curb, an eight-foot planting strip, an eight-foot sidewalk, street trees and storm drainage improvements. A condition of approval requires installation of half street improvements to code. Though the applicant indicated they will request a modification of the street frontage improvements pursuant to RMC 4-9-250.C.5.d, the applicant has not yet submitted such a request. No transportation impact fees are applicable to this project. F. Parking. Adequate parking exists on site to service the substation. No changes to the existing parking or driveway access are proposed. 5. Adverse Impacts. As conditioned, there are no significant adverse impacts associated with the project. Specific issues related to impacts are discussed below. A. Tree Retention. As conditioned, the proposal will satisfy tree retention and landscape screening requirements. The applicant submitted an arborist report and landscape narrative (Ex. 8 and 20) and a Stormwater Pond Tree Removal and Landscaping Plan (Ex. 4). A total of 116 significant trees are presently on site. The construction of the stormwater pond will remove a total of 69 trees. An additional 11 trees are proposed for removal to the west of the entrance driveway along CONDITIONAL USE 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 the south side of the substation. Therefore, a total of 80 trees are proposed for removal. A total of 36 significant trees (31 %) are proposed for retention. The City's tree retention standards require a minimum of 30 percent tree retention. The proposal significantly complies with the City's tree retention requirements. The applicant has argued the 11 Douglas Firs located near the entrance drive pose a wind throw hazard to the substation and its operations. Though the applicant intends to retain shrubs and smaller trees in this area to serve as a landscape screen, the applicant did not provide an explanation as to why the trees cannot be pruned or trimmed rather than completely removed. A condition of approval will require the applicant to provide a revised arborists report detailing an explanation as to why no reasonable alternative to tree removal is possible. The condition will further require suggested locations and species of supplemental trees to replace the existing Douglas firs. B. Landscaping. As conditioned, no impacts from the proposed landscaping plan are anticipated. The applicant submitted a tree removal and landscaping plan (Ex. 4). The majority of the site will not be disturbed and existing native landscaping will continue to screen adjacent residential properties. The proposed new stormwater detention pond will be located along the southeaster edge of the substation. The City code requires a 15-foot landscape buffer around the storrnwater perimeter. The applicant has alternatively proposed landscape screening southwest of the stormwater pond, immediately south of the existing driveway, and to the west of the storrnwater pond outside the perimeter fence, rather than along the entire perimeter. The applicant plans to fill gaps in the existing natural vegetative screening between the substation and existing residences. The proposed site obscuring landscaping buffer will be 20 feet in width in these two locations and will contain a mix of trees and large shrubs. The existing vegetation provides screening when viewed from the southeast and southwest of the site. However, as noted above in FOF SA, the applicant proposes the removal of 11 trees south of the substation and to the west of the access drive. The applicant has not proposed additional plantings in this location. Removal of the trees in this location could reduce the effectiveness of the landscape screening. Therefore, a condition of approval will require the applicant to submit a revised tree replacement/visual barrier plan for this area. C. Geologically Hazardous Areas. Critical areas will not be adversely affected and the project will not result in impacts to health and safety for people utilizing the site or in surrounding areas. The applicant submitted a geotechnical report (Ex. 6). The project contains moderate coalmine and landslide hazards with sensitive slopes within 50 feet. The extent of disturbance for the proposal will be 5.89 acres. The net cut/fill will be 2,500-cubic yards with 11.500 cubic yards of cut and 9,000 cubic yards of fill. The geotechnical report concludes the proposal will not adversely affect the stability of the slopes in or around the site and coalmine hazards are minimal. In the absence of any contrary evidence, the examiner takes the geotechnical engineer's conclusions as verity. D. Structure Scale. The proposed new structure will have a maximum building height of 19' 4" with a 4: 12 pitched roof. The building will be obscured from view by the nearest residential area with native and planted landscaping. No adverse effects are anticipated for surrounding properties. CONDITIONAL USE 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l l 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 E. Traffic. The Talbot Hill substation property is accessed via an ex1stmg access driveway extending from Puget Drive SE. The applicant is proposing improvements to the existing access driveway including repaving with asphalt, widening the approach apron, and a security gate. The project will not generate a significant number of vehicles trips either during construction or operation. No traffic impacts to the surrounding area are anticipated. F. Noise, Light and Glare. The reconstructed building will have minimal lighting to provide for safe egress. The lighting will be directed downward. No glare or light are expected to be visible from neighboring properties. The substation is over 460 feet from the nearest residential lot. No noise impacts to surrounding areas are anticipated. Conclusions of Law I. Authority. Large utilities are allowed in the R-8 district as a conditional use subject to Hearing Examiner review (RMC 4-2-060(0)). RMC 4-8-080(G) classifies conditional use applications as Type III permits when Hearing Examiner review is required. Site plan review is not required in the R-8 zone, except optionally when site plan review may be used as a means to propose modifications to development standards for developments otherwise exempt from site plan review (RMC 4-9- 200(8)(2)(b )). Pursuant to RMC 4-4-70(F)(8), site plan review is required for the proposal in order to deviate from storm drainage facility landscaping standards. In the absence of the conditional use permit application, no Hearing Examiner review would be required for the site plan and it would be classified as a Type II permit by RMC 4-8-080(G). Both of the aforementioned permits have been consolidated. RMC 4-8-080(C)(2) requires consolidated permits to each be processed under "the highest-number procedure". The conditional use has the highest numbered review procedures, so both permits must be processed as Type III applications. As Type III applications, RMC 4-8-0SO(G) grants the Examiner with the authority to hold a hearing and issue a final decision on them, subject to closed record appeal to the City Council. 2. Zoning/Comprehensive Plan Designations. The subject property is zoned R-8, a single family residential zone. The comprehensive plan land use designation is Residential Medium Density. 3. Review Criteria. Conditional use criteria are governed by RMC 4-9-030(C). Site plan review criteria are governed by RMC 4-9-200(E). All applicable criteria are quoted below in italics and applied through corresponding conclusions oflaw. Conditional Use The Administrator or designee or the Hearing Examiner shall consider, as applicable, the following factors for all applications: CONDITIONAL USE 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-0JO(C)(l): Consistency with Plans and Regulations: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general goals, objectives, policies and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton. 4. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan as outlined in Finding 16 of the Staff report, adopted and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. The proposal is consistent with all applicable zoning and other development standards as outlined in Finding 17 of the Staff report, adopted and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. RMC 4-9-030(C)(2): Appropriate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location shall be suited for the proposed use. 5. The substation is an existing utility facility on a large lot. The proposed location of the reconstructed and expanded building will not result in either the detrimental over-concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The substation footprint will remain unchanged and, as conditioned, the improvements will be fully screened from adjacent residences through thick and dense native vegetation and landscaping. As discussed in the Staff Report, the proposed location is suitable for the proposed use. Given these factors the criterion is met. RMC 4-9-030(C)(3): Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. 6. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5 and as conditioned, there are no adverse impacts associated with the proposal, so it will not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. RMC 4-9-030(C)(4): Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. 7. The proposal is an expansion of an existing building within an existing utility use. The footprint of the overall substation will not change. As conditioned, the reconstructed building and stormwater pond will be fully screened from view. The proposed use will meet all of the City's bulk and dimensional regulations and will provide landscaping on the site that will buffer the residential uses on all sides. This criterion is satisfied. RMC 4-9-030(C)(5): Parking: Adequate parking is, or will be made, available. 8. No additional parking is proposed. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 4, adequate parking exists on site to service the substation. This criterion is met. CONDITIONAL USE 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-030(C)(6): Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and shall mitigate potential effects on the surrounding area. 9. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the project will not have a significant impact on the general traffic in the vicinity and, as conditioned, provides for adequate and safe pedestrian circulation. The criterion is met. RMC 4-9-030(C)(7): Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use shall be evaluated and mitigated. 10. As stated in FOF SF, no impacts from noise, light or glare are anticipated. This criterion is satisfied. RMC 4-9-0JO(C)(S): Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings, paving, or critical areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. 11. As conditioned, the landscape complies with the City's landscape regulations. As described in FOF 5(8), landscaping will provide a vegetative screening between the substation and adjacent residential areas. The reconstructed building and stormwater pond will be fully screened. As conditioned, this criterion is met. Site Plan RMC 4-9-200(E)(3): Criteria: The Administrator or designee must find a proposed project to be in compliance with the following: a. Compliance and Consistency: Conformance with plans, policies, regulations and approvals, including: i. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan, its elements, goals, objectives, and policies, especially those of the applicable land use designation, the Community Design Element; and any applicable adopted Neighborhood Plan; ii. Applicable land use regulations; iii. Relevant Planned Action Ordinance and Development Agreements; and iv. Design Regulations: Intent and guidelines of the design regulations located in RMC 4-3-100. 12. As discussed in Conclusion of Law No. 4, as conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan, as well as development and design regulations. The proposal does not qualify as a Planned Action Ordinance, as outlined at Finding No. 2 l(d) of the Staff Report. The Staff CONDITIONAL USE 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Report Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are adopted and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(b): Off-Site Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses, including: i. Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentration of development on a particular portion of the site; ii. Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets, walkways and adjacent properties; iii. Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities, rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from surrounding properties; iv. Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features; v. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the project; and vi. Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. 13. The substation facility is necessarily concentrated on one portion of the site; however the scale and bulk of the building is compatible with the low rise residential structures that surround the site. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, no lighting or view impacts are anticipated and landscaping is effectively used to protect adjoining properties from noise and glare and to maintain privacy and enhance the appearance of the project. This criterion is satisfied. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(c): On-Site Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to the site, including: i. Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing and orientation; ii. Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle needs; iii. Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces; and CONDITIONAL USE 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 iv. Land.,·caping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally to enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the design and protection of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. 14. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the site is large with 460 feet of native vegetation between the substation and the nearest residential area. As proposed and conditioned, native and planted landscaping has been well designed to provide for privacy and noise reduction. There is nothing in the record to reasonably suggest that the scale, spacing and orientation of the project could be modified to provide for more privacy and noise reduction without unreasonably interfering with the objectives of the facility. The scale of the facility will not create any adverse impacts as discussed and is compatible with vehicle and pedestrian circulation as determined in Finding of Fact No. 5. In addition, there is nothing in the record to reasonably suggest that the scale of the project is incompatible with sunlight, prevailing winds or natural characteristics. The comments by Staff on this criterion, at Finding No. 2l(f), are adopted by this reference and incorporated as if set forth in full. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(d): Access and Circulation: Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users, including: i. Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties; ii. Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access weys; iii. Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas; iv. Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access; and v. Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. 15. The proposal provides for adequate access and circulation as required by the criterion above for the reasons identified in Finding of Fact No. 4(E), 4(F), and 5(E). RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(e): Open Space: Incorporating open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site. 16. No open space is required for this use CONDITIONAL USE 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(t): Views and Public Access: When possible, providing view corridors to shorelines and Mt. Rainier, and incorporating public access to shorelines. 17. There are no view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier affected by the proposal. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(g): Natural Systems: Arranging project elements to protect existing natural systems where applicable. 18. As determined in FOF 5(C), the natural systems at the site will not be adversely affected by the proposal. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(h): Services and Infrastructure: Making available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use. 19. The project is served by adequate services and facilities as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(i): Phasing: Including a detailed sequencing plan with development phases and estimated time frames, for phased projects. 20. The applicant has provided a detailed phasing plan as described in the staff report. This criterion is satisfied. DECISION As conditioned below, the conditional use permit is approved. 1. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated, dated January 23, 2017. 2. If the 11 trees to the west of the access driveway are proposed for removal, the applicant shall submit a revised tree replacement/visual barrier plan at the time of Construction Permit application for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. 3. The applicant shall submit a revised Arborist Report with Construction Permit application for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. The revised Arborist Report shall provide further detailed explanation for why no reasonable alternative to tree removal is possible for the 11 trees to the west of the access driveway and shall provide suggested locations and species of supplemental trees to be planted. The report shall include planting and maintenance specifications for replacement trees. 4. The applicant shall either submit plans to construct the required half street improvements along Puget Drive SE (including the required 8-foot wide landscape strip between the curb and CONDITIONAL USE 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l l 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 sidewalk) or shall acquire approval of a modification from the required frontage improvements at the time of Civil Construction Permit Review. 5. The City shall establish a call-in number for citizens to complain about noise or other construction related issues. DATED this 28th day of February, 2017. I Emily Terrell City of Renton Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices RMC 4-8-l lO(E)(9) provides that the final decision of the Hearing Examiner is subject to appeal to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-l 10(E)(9) requires appeals of the Hearing Examiner's decision to be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Hearing Examiner's decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing e examiner may also be filed within this 14 day appeal period as identified in RMC 4-8-1 lO(E)(S) and RMC 4-8-100(G)(4). A new fourteen (14) day appeal period shall commence upon the issuance of the reconsideration. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th floor, (425) 430-65 lO. Affected property owners may request a change m valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program ofrevaluation. CONDITIONAL USE 12 CITY OF RENTON \ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: April 25, 2017 To: City Clerk's Office From: Gillian Syverson Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements LUA (file) Number: LUA16-000922, ECF, SA-H, CUP-H Cross-References: N/A AKA's: N/A Project Manager: Angelea Weihs Acceptance Date: December 22, 2016 Applicant: Puget Sound Energy, Kerry Kriner Owner: Puget Sound Energy Contact: Kerry Kriner PID Number: 2023059003, 2023059066 ERC Determination: DNS-M Date: January 23, 2017 Anneal Period Ends: Februarv 10. 2017 Administrative Decision: N/A Date: N/A Anneal Period Ends: N/A Public Hearing Date: February 14, 2017 Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Anneal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Location: Comments: ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS-M -Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated; DS -Determination of Significance. Denis Law Mayor Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator April 24, 2017 Puget Sound Energy ATIN: Ms. Kerry Kriner P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 SUBJECT: Waiver of Requirements for Frontage Improvements along Puget Drive SE (Permit No. (17001111) Dear Ms. Kriner: The City of Renton has reviewed your request to waive the required half street improvement including 54-ft of paved roadway width (27-ft from centerline), 0.5-foot curb and gutter, 8-foot planting strip, 8-foot sidewalk, 2-foot clearance between sidewalk and right of way along the Puget Drive SE property frontage as noted in Municipal Code (RMC) 4-6-060(F). ANALYSIS: Frontage improvements are required by Renton Municipal Code for projects that exceed $50,000 value. However, RMC 4-6-250(() allows for a waiver of the requirements subject to the criteria below. Staff's analysis of the request follows each listed criteria. a. Required street improvements will alter an existing wetlands or stream, or have a negative impact on a shoreline's area. Staff Analysis: There are no wetlands or streams along Puget Drive SE. b. Existing steep topography would make required street improvements infeasible. Staff Analysis: There is a small portion of the right of way adjacent to Puget Drive SE that is a regulated steep slope however these regulated steep slopes are smo/1 in nature and would make the street improvements infeasible. c. Required street improvements would have a negative impact on other properties, such as restricting available access. Staff Analysis: The street improvements would have little to no negative impacts to other properties. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov Ms. Kerry Kriner Page 2 of2 April 24, 2017 d. There are no similar improvements in the vicinity and there is little likelihood that the improvements will be needed or required in the next ten (10) years. Staff Analysis: Puget Drive SE is designated as a prapased bicycle corridor on the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. The Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan has lists Puget Drive SE between Panther Creek and 116'h Avenue SE/Beacon Way SE as a medium priority improvement project to construct the required street improvements along with bicycle lanes. Based on this, the street improvements will be needed in the next ten (10) years. e. In no case shall a waiver be granted unless it is shown that there will be no detrimental effect on the public health, safety or welfare if the improvements are not installed, and that the improvements are not needed for current or future development. Staff Analysis: See response to criterion "F. A bicycle corridor has been proposed along Puget Drive SE as part of the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and therefore it has been determined that the required street improvements are needed to maintain safety for bicyclists. DECISION: The requested waiver from frontage improvements (RMC 4-6-0GO(F) by the applicant is denied, as the request does not comply with the waiver criteria of RMC 4-6- 250((). This decision, to approve the waiver, is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter per RMC 4-8-110. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City Clerk, along with the required appeal fee, by 5:00 pm, May 9'h, 2017. Sincerely, Development Engineering Manager cc: Chip Vincent, CED Administrator Jennifer Henning, Development Engineering Manager Craig Burnell, Building Official Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Justin Johnson, Civil Engineer II 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 , rentonwa.gov ® March 2, 2017 Kerry Kriner Puget Sound Energy P.O. Box 97034 M/5 PSE -09N Bellevue, WA 98009 Subject: Hearing Examiner's Final Decision Denis Law Mayor City Clerk -Jason A. Seth, CMC RE: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements (LUA-16-000922) Dear Mr. Kriner: Enclosed please find the Hearing Examiner's Final Decision dated February 28, 2017. I can be reached at (425) 430-6510 or jseth@rentonwa.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, -~~ Jason A. Seth, CMC City Clerk cc: Hearing Examiner Angelea Weihs, Associate Planner Jennifer Henning, Planning Director Clark Close, Senior Planner Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager Craig Burnell, Building Official Jennifer Cisneros, Secretary, Planning Division Julia Medzegian, City Council Liaison Parties of Record (6) 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 , (425) 430-6510 I Fax (425) 430-6516 • rentonwa.gov 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON Talbot Hill Substation Improvements Conditional Use Permit LUA 16-000922, ECF, SA-H, CUP-H FINAL DECISION Summary Puget Sound Energy is requesting conditional use permit and site plan review approval to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation. The applicant seeks to demolish an existing 999sfbuilding and replace it with a new l ,449sf building. The applicant will also remove substation equipment and create a new storm drainage system. The conditional use permit is approved with conditions. Testimony Angelea Weihs, Associate Planner, summarized the staff report and entered additional exhibits into the record (Ex. 17-19). She noted the City had received comment from Seattle PUD regarding access. In response to the examiner, Ms. Weihs stated the substation was in excess of 460 feet from the nearest residences and that the existing and proposed planting areas will serve as a buffer. Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager, stated the project must meet the King County Stormwater Manual. In response to the examiner, Ms. Bannwarth stated all the potential impacts from the project with respect to construction are mitigated within the City's development codes. Ms. Bannwarth stated the City would be amenable to adding a condition of approval requiring the City to set up a call number for construction related concerns. CONDITIONAL USE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Kerry Kriner, Planner for PSE, stated the staff report is incorrect in describing the building proposed for demolition as a control house. The building is actually an oil storage building. Ms. Kriner noted PSE had originally applied for a permit in March 2016 and was told the building was exempt from the !BC and therefore did not require a permit. In September, the City of Renton required an electrical permit and then reversed the need for a building permit. In response to the examiner, Jennifer Henning, Planning Director, stated the City had not originally known the building was taller than the maximum height for an accessory structure permitted within the zone. They had originally understood the building was smaller and not as tall. The electrical permit triggered the need for a building permit. The presence of a building permit triggered a conditional use permit because of the use within the zone. Ms. Kriner stated PSE objects to the City's $200,000 frontage improvement requirement and will be submitting a request for a waiver. No modifications or variances are currently at issue. Ms. Kriner stated the applicant had submitted a landscape narrative (Ex. 20). Ms. Henning stated the value of the applicant's improvements triggered the frontage improvements. Exhibits The February 14, 2107 Staff Report Exhibits 1-16 identified at part B of the Staff Report itself were admitted into the record during the hearing. In addition, the following exhibits were admitted during the hearing. Exhibit 17 Staff PowerPoint Exhibit 18 COR Maps Exhibit 19 Google Maps Exhibit 20 Landscape Narrative (December 13, 2106) FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: I. Applicant. Puget Sound Energy. 2. Hearing. The Examiner held a hearing on the subject application on February 14, 2017 at 11 :00 am in the City of Renton Council Chambers. Substantive: 3. Project Description. Puget Sound Energy is requesting hearing examiner conditional use permit approval and site plan approval to perform improvements at the existing Talbot Hill Substation located at 2400 S. Puget Dr. The site is 50.4 acres. PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot CONDITIONAL USE 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment. The existing 999sf oil storage building I will be demolished and replaced with a l,440sfbuilding. The existing 230kV substation equipment will be removed, including steel structures and foundations. No additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system is proposed within the fenced area. A detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve excavation of more than 500 cubic yards of soil. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. Access to the site is provided via an existing driveway extending from Puget Drive Southeast. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The applicant proposes to construct the project in two phases. Phase one includes the civil portions of the project. This phase is proposed for April 2017 to October 2017. Phase two includes assembly of the electrical equipment which is proposed for April 2018 to October 2018. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes. The site is zoned Residential R-8 and the Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Medium Density (RMD). The site is surrounded by single family uses in the R-8 zone on the north, east and south. To the west are single-family and multi-family dwellings in the R-8 and RMF zones. 4. Adequacy of Infrastructure/Public Services. The project will be served by adequate infrastructure and public services as follows: A. Water and Sewer Service. Neither water nor sewer service is proposed or required for the redevelopment project. B. Fire and Police. Police and Fire Prevention Staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. C. Drainage. Runoff from the site sheet flows outward from the middle of the substation. There are existing drainage pipes from the northeast and southeast side of the substation which are tied to catch basins within the fence line. The rims of the catch basins are currently at an elevation higher than the surrounding ground, which prevents them from capturing stormwater. Grade differences between the substation slab and the surrounding ground surface along the north and northeast sides of the substation prevent storrnwater from draining away from the substation, which tends to pond within the substation footprint. Runoff along the southern edge of the 1 The staff report refers to the structure as a control house~ however, the applicant at hearing corrected the description. CONDITIONAL USE 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 substation flows into a culvert located beneath the access road which ultimately flows east towards Grant A venue South. The applicant's Preliminary Drainage Plan and Technical Infonnation Report (TIR) (Ex. 7) demonstrates compliance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the 20 IO City of Renton Amendments thereto. A new storm drainage system is proposed within the fenced area. A detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence and will involve excavation of more than 500 cubic yards of soil. Drainage improvements include a new storm water conveyance network inside the substation which would route flows to a 75,000-cubic foot stormwater detention pond located along the southeastern edge of the substation. The pond will discharge to a depression on the southern side of the existing access road, where flow would resume the existing drainage path towards Grand Avenue South. The applicant is exempt from water quality requirements. D. Parks/Open Space. City development standards do not require any set-asides or mitigation for parks and open space for the proposed use. E. Transportation. The site is bordered by Beacon Way South to the northeast. Beacon Way South is classified as a Residential Access Road and is located within the City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline Easement. Access to the site is provided via an existing access driveway extending to Puget Drive Southeast. Puget Drive Southeast is classified as a Minor Arterial street. The existing right of way for Puget Drive Southeast is approximately 100 feet wide and contains no frontage improvements. RMC 4-6-060 requires half street improvements including 0.5-foot curb, an eight-foot planting strip, an eight-foot sidewalk, street trees and storm drainage improvements. A condition of approval requires installation of half street improvements to code. Though the applicant indicated they will request a modification of the street frontage improvements pursuant to RMC 4-9-250.C.5.d, the applicant has not yet submitted such a request. No transportation impact fees are applicable to this project. F. Parking. Adequate parking exists on site to service the substation. No changes to the existing parking or driveway access are proposed. 5. Adverse Impacts. As conditioned, there are no significant adverse impacts associated with the project. Specific issues related to impacts are discussed below. A. Tree Retention. As conditioned, the proposal will satisfy tree retention and landscape screening requirements. The applicant submitted an arborist report and landscape narrative (Ex. 8 and 20) and a Stormwater Pond Tree Removal and Landscaping Plan (Ex. 4). A total of 116 significant trees are presently on site. The construction of the stormwater pond will remove a total of 69 trees. An additional 11 trees are proposed for removal to the west of the entrance driveway along CONDITIONAL USE 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 the south side of the substation. Therefore, a total of 80 trees are proposed for removal. A total of 36 significant trees (31%) are proposed for retention. The City's tree retention standards require a minimum of 30 percent tree retention. The proposal significantly complies with the City's tree retention requirements. The applicant has argued the 11 Douglas Firs located near the entrance drive pose a wind throw hazard to the substation and its operations. Though the applicant intends to retain shrubs and smaller trees in this area to serve as a landscape screen, the applicant did not provide an explanation as to why the trees cannot be pruned or trimmed rather than completely removed. A condition of approval will require the applicant to provide a revised arborists report detailing an explanation as to why no reasonable alternative to tree removal is possible. The condition will further require suggested locations and species of supplemental trees to replace the existing Douglas firs. B. Landscaping. As conditioned, no impacts from the proposed landscaping plan are anticipated. The applicant submitted a tree removal and landscaping plan (Ex. 4). The majority of the site will not be disturbed and existing native landscaping will continue to screen adjacent residential properties. The proposed new stormwater detention pond will be located along the southeaster edge of the substation. The City code requires a 15-foot landscape buffer around the stormwater perimeter. The applicant has alternatively proposed landscape screening southwest of the stormwater pond, immediately south of the existing driveway, and to the west of the stormwater pond outside the perimeter fence, rather than along the entire perimeter. The applicant plans to fill gaps in the existing natural vegetative screening between the substation and existing residences. The proposed site obscuring landscaping buffer will be 20 feet in width in these two locations and will contain a mix of trees and large shrubs. The existing vegetation provides screening when viewed from the southeast and southwest of the site. However, as noted above in FOF 5A, the applicant proposes the removal of 11 trees south of the substation and to the west of the access drive. The applicant has not proposed additional plantings in this location. Removal of the trees in this location could reduce the effectiveness of the landscape screening. Therefore, a condition of approval will require the applicant to submit a revised tree replacement/visual barrier plan for this area. C. Geologically Hazardous Areas. Critical areas will not be adversely affected and the project will not result in impacts to health and safety for people utilizing the site or in surrounding areas. The applicant submitted a geotechnical report (Ex. 6). The project contains moderate coalmine and landslide hazards with sensitive slopes within 50 feet. The extent of disturbance for the proposal will be 5.89 acres. The net cut/fill will be 2,500-cubic yards with 11.500 cubic yards of cut and 9,000 cubic yards of fill. The geotechnical report concludes the proposal will not adversely affect the stability of the slopes in or around the site and coalmine hazards are minimal. In the absence of any contrary evidence, the examiner takes the geotechnical engineer's conclusions as verity. D. Structure Scale. The proposed new structure will have a maximum building height of 19' 4" with a 4: 12 pitched roof. The building will be obscured from view by the nearest residential area with native and planted landscaping. No adverse effects are anticipated for surrounding properties. CONDITIONAL USE 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 E. Traffic. The Talbot Hill substation property is accessed via an ex1stmg access driveway extending from Puget Drive SE. The applicant is proposing improvements to the existing access driveway including repaving with asphalt, widening the approach apron, and a security gate. The project will not generate a significant number of vehicles trips either during construction or operation. No traffic impacts to the surrounding area are anticipated. F. Noise, Light and Glare. The reconstructed building will have minimal lighting to provide for safe egress. The lighting will be directed downward. No glare or light are expected to be visible from neighboring properties. The substation is over 460 feet from the nearest residential lot. No noise impacts to surrounding areas are anticipated. Conclusions of Law I. Authority. Large utilities are allowed in the R-8 district as a conditional use subject to Hearing Examiner review (RMC 4-2-060(0)). RMC 4-8-0SO(G) classifies conditional use applications as Type Ill permits when Hearing Examiner review is required. Site plan review is not required in the R-8 zone, except optionally when site plan review may be used as a means to propose modifications to development standards for developments otherwise exempt from site plan review (RMC 4-9- 200(B)(2)(b)). Pursuant to RMC 4-4-70(F)(8), site plan review is required for the proposal in order to deviate from storm drainage facility landscaping standards. In the absence of the conditional use permit application, no Hearing Examiner review would be required for the site plan and it would be classified as a Type II permit by RMC 4-8-080(0). Both of the aforementioned permits have been consolidated. RMC 4-8-080(C)(2) requires consolidated permits to each be processed under "the highest-number procedure". The conditional use has the highest numbered review procedures, so both permits must be processed as Type Ill applications. As Type Ill applications, RMC 4-8-0SO(G) grants the Examiner with the authority to hold a hearing and issue a final decision on them, subject to closed record appeal to the City Council. 2. Zoning/Comprehensive Plan Designations. The subject property is zoned R-8, a single family residential zone. The comprehensive plan land use designation is Residential Medium Density. 3. Review Criteria. Conditional use criteria are governed by RMC 4-9-030(C). Site plan review criteria are governed by RMC 4-9-200(E). All applicable criteria are quoted below in italics and applied through corresponding conclusions of law. Conditional Use The Administrator or designee or the Hearing Examiner shall consider, as applicable, the following factors for all applications: CONDITIONAL USE 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-030(C)(l): Consistency with Plans and Regulations: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general goals, objectives, policies and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton. 4. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan as outlined in Finding 16 of the Staff report, adopted and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. The proposal is consistent with all applicable zoning and other development standards as outlined in Finding 17 of the Staff report, adopted and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. RMC 4-9-030(C)(2): Appropriate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location shall be suited for the proposed use. 5. The substation is an existing utility facility on a large lot. The proposed location of the reconstructed and expanded building will not result in either the detrimental over-concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The substation footprint will remain unchanged and, as conditioned, the improvements will be fully screened from adjacent residences through thick and dense native vegetation and landscaping. As discussed in the Staff Report, the proposed location is suitable for the proposed use. Given these factors the criterion is met. RMC 4-9-0JO(C)(J): Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on acljacent property. 6. As detennined in Finding of Fact No. 5 and as conditioned, there are no adverse impacts associated with the proposal, so it will not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. RMC 4-9-030(C)(4): Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. 7. The proposal is an expansion of an existing building within an existing utility use. The footprint of the overall substation will not change. As conditioned, the reconstructed building and stonnwater pond will be fully screened from view. The proposed use will meet all of the City's bulk and dimensional regulations and will provide landscaping on the site that will buffer the residential uses on all sides. This criterion is satisfied. RMC 4-9-0JO(C)(S): Parking: Adequate parking is, or will be made, available. 8. No additional parking is proposed. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 4, adequate parking exists on site to service the substation. This criterion is met. CONDITIONAL USE 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-030(C)(6): Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and shall mitigate potential effects on the surrounding area. 9. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the project will not have a significant impact on the general traffic in the vicinity and, as conditioned, provides for adequate and safe pedestrian circulation. The criterion is met. RMC 4-9-030(C)(7): Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use shall be evaluated and mitigated. I 0. As stated in FOF SF, no impacts from noise, light or glare are anticipated. This criterion is satisfied. RMC 4-9-030(C)(8): Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings, paving, or critical areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. 11. As conditioned, the landscape complies with the City's landscape regulations. As described in FOF 5(8), landscaping will provide a vegetative screening between the substation and adjacent residential areas. The reconstructed building and stormwater pond will be fully screened. As conditioned, this criterion is met. Site Plan RMC 4-9-200(E)(3): Criteria: The Administrator or designee must find a proposed project to be in compliance with the following: a. Compliance and Consistency: Co,iformance with plans, policies, regulations and approvals, including: i. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan, its elements, goals, objectives, and policies, especially those of the applicable land use designation; the Community Design Element; and any applicable adopted Neighborhood Plan; ii. Applicable land use regulations; iii. Relevant Planned Action Ordinance and Development Agreements; and iv. Design Regulations: Intent and guidelines of the design regulations located in RMC 4-3-100. 12. As discussed in Conclusion of Law No. 4, as conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan, as well as development and design regulations. The proposal does not qualify as a Planned Action Ordinance, as outlined at Finding No. 2 l(d) of the Staff Report. The Staff CONDITIONAL USE 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Report Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are adopted and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(b): Off-Site Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and use.,·, including: i. Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentration of development on a particular portion of the site; iL Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets, walkways and adjacent properties; iiL Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities, rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from surrounding properties; iv. Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features; v. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the project; and vi. Lighting: Designing and/or placing exterior lighting and glazing iri order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. 13. The substation facility is necessarily concentrated on one portion of the site; however the scale and bulk of the building is compatible with the low rise residential structures that surround the site. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, no lighting or view impacts are anticipated and landscaping is effectively used to protect adjoining properties from noise and glare and to maintain privacy and enhance the appearance of the project. This criterion is satisfied. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(c): On-Site Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to the site, including: i. Structure Placement: Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing and orientation; ii. Structure Scale: Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle needs; iii. Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces; and CONDITIONAL USE 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 iv. Landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally to enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the design and protection of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. 14. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the site is large with 460 feet of native vegetation between the substation and the nearest residential area. As proposed and conditioned, native and planted landscaping has been well designed to provide for privacy and noise reduction. There is nothing in the record to reasonably suggest that the scale, spacing and orientation of the project could be modified to provide for more privacy and noise reduction without unreasonably interfering with the objectives of the facility. The scale of the facility will not create any adverse impacts as discussed and is compatible with vehicle and pedestrian circulation as determined in Finding of Fact No. 5. In addition, there is nothing in the record to reasonably suggest that the scale of the project is incompatible with sunlight, prevailing winds or natural characteristics. The comments by Staff on this criterion, at Finding No. 21(!), are adopted by this reference and incorporated as if set forth in full. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(d): Access and Circulation: Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users, including: i. Location and Consolidation: Providing access points on side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties; ii. Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including lhe location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access poinls, drives, parking, lurnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways; iii. Loading and Delivery: Separaling loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas; iv. Transit and Bicycles: Providing lransit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access; and v. Pedestrians: Providing safe and atlractive pedeslrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. 15. The proposal provides for adequate access and circulation as required by the criterion above for the reasons identified in Finding of Fact No. 4(E), 4(F), and 5(E). RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(e): Open Space: Incorporating open spaces to serve as distinctive projecl focal points and lo provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by lhe occupants/users of the sile. 16. No open space is required for this use CONDITIONAL USE 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(1): Views and Public Access: When possible, providing view corridors to shorelines and Mt. Rainier. and incorporating public access to shorelines. 17. There are no view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier affected by the proposal. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(g): Natural Systems: Arranging project elements to protect existing natural systems where applicable. 18. As determined in FOF 5(C), the natural systems at the site will not be adversely affected by the proposal. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(h): Services and Infrastructure: Making available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use. 19. The project is served by adequate services and facilities as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(i): Phasing: Including a detailed sequencing plan with development phases and estimated time frames. for phased projects. 20. The applicant has provided a detailed phasing plan as described in the staff report. This criterion is satisfied. DECISION As conditioned below, the conditional use permit is approved. I. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated, dated January 23, 2017. 2. If the 11 trees to the west of the access driveway are proposed for removal, the applicant shall submit a revised tree replacement/visual barrier plan at the time of Construction Permit application for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. 3. The applicant shall submit a revised Arborist Report with Construction Permit application for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager. The revised Arborist Report shall provide further detailed explanation for why no reasonable alternative to tree cemoval is possible for the 11 trees to the west of the access driveway and shall provide suggested locations and species of supplemental trees to be planted. The report shall include planting and maintenance specifications for replacement trees. 4. The applicant shall either submit plans to construct the required half street improvements along Puget Drive SE (including the required 8-foot wide landscape strip between the curb and CONDITIONAL USE 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 sidewalk) or shall acquire approval of a modification from the required frontage improvements at the time of Civil Construction Permit Review. 5. The City shall establish a call-in number for citizens to complain about noise or other construction related issues. DA TED this 28th day of February, 2017. c.~ )..Q..1.,~,ll I Emily Terrell City of Renton Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices RMC 4-8-l lO(E)(9) provides that the final decision of the Hearing Examiner is subject to appeal to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-11 O(E)(9) requires appeals of the Hearing Examiner's decision to be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Hearing Examiner's decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing e examiner may also be filed within this 14 day appeal period as identified in RMC 4-8-l 10(E)(8) and RMC 4-8-1 OO(G)(4). A new fourteen (14) day appeal period shall commence upon the issuance of the reconsideration. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th floor, (425) 430-6510. Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. CONDITIONAL USE 12 -· . !mLR~N,TON DEPARTIS(1ENTOF.COM rrf& ECONOIVIICDEVELOl'M~NT,:('LANNINGiCllVI.SION . Af.FI.Cl~YIT ,gi;:SER\IICEiiBY MAIL.ING On the 7th day of February, 2017, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing HEX Report and Exhibits documents. This information was sent to: Puget Sound Energy Owner Kerry Kriner Contact/ Applicant Phil Olbrechts Hearing Examiner Parties of Record See attached (Signature of Sender): --'tr4"--IJ"-'-----'----''------F-->.a•~---'Q,.,-~=--=· '-------=----------- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jenny Cisneros signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Dated: 'l'.tl>CWI ~ 1 1 g.pq Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements LUA16-000922, ECF, SA-H, CUP-H template· affidavit of service by mailing Puget Sound Energy, Inc. PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N Bellevue. WA 980099734 Kerrv Kriner Puget Sound Energy PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N Bellevue. WA 980099734 Bob Gambill Seattle Public Utilities -SPU_ WTR PO BOX 34018 Seattle, WA 981244018 Kimberly Board WOODCUFFE APARTMENTS 1205 Grant Ave S Renton, WA 98055-6057 Johnioseph Paior 1411 Grant Ave, C204 Renton. WA 98055 LAND USE HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET Talbot Hill Substation Improvements, LUAlG-000922, ECF, CUP-H February 14, 2017, 11:00 AM PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY ADDRESS Phone # with area code Email NAME (including City & Zip) (optional) {optional} CAr1sfcy:>kr KvJSe,1/ 3,S-5" //'7/-JJ A J/t!-NE F5TPf hi '72-> -?66-3f"Z."! 01"'1ST~ rv,;.rd/€1),,o.--/Je,l/e,y/e,/ WJ<J "'!ot:JeJ <./ ·~J VY/nif ~~~q~ ft~ A • _-i Jf\; '1 e:ct9i ~-t%,Z-~ ~.tnw~·'-/' r I Mn\l~ W t'o PJD'f.. 1107.,t.J 1-es, o2iV\l ~~-~···1 z.f 7-S-Lf-1.12. a'l?.3 1'{)1Hvf· t<UA e ~ .t •A · •r I \J . ·-. . Q ~ ~z~ ~o~ ~~u ~~~ 0 <I;,-., ~~~ ~~CJ".) ~~> ~CJ".)~ 0 rt) N ._c>-Lu<'. \J \J :::> es ~O<: V\ LL.i ~ s: 1-' ~ UJ "' UJ I.!) z <( er: -:£ I-er: 0 z m N 0.. ::i:: "' z 3: 0 I- 0 m z 0 6 UJ Vl ;;! w Vl < 0 .,.,..,. .. .,=: f t:lt:t: ~M~~~s 5 ;::~~~;Gs~t~ ~ ~ ----------- ., ~ ·····-i ~ H2~1! !II I ~ B J ! ; ! I i , I ; ;11 ' ' ! ' \' \, \ rt\ !:: l:O ::c X w ! z ., ~ 0.. ., w "' ., """' \ \ \ \ -=-Z--= ! . . . " \ '""'' ~ ! 0 • ~ ,l"' ' ' ',' -~~,I!· .;le:!':!, '::' •• • TALBO, H cl SJBS,A-ON ·-rn:: Rf ~OVAi TY"'. ~ STORMWATER POND TREE REMOVAL A~D LANDSCAPING ,- i ' ( ARE.A OF SHEc:JJYJ: TRE" REMOVAL WEST OF STORMWATE~ POND ----------r--' EXHIBIT 4 "cl'Y•> S•JB"""""-""'"'-'".C'--'.E'.'''! MWSCI,~" KEV 1 EMERGFNT PLANTl~G US~ED\IX 1 VISUA_ BARRI~~ ~LA~T NC ~ @ ;;.o .,,. ~~,1 l'-i --- SfA.f , m:r V'SUA_ B.ARRIEFi PL.ANT NG PL.A\ TA_80T '"i L_ SUB~TATION ..... -:~;~; i I ·1 += ~;,pps,,vi:, ' _::1l'.l? suasr.ro~ ~~i~-"!i~~ -,~1_c,,_ >-w ;; "' z > < DB]···o-··D.· I <:.'.: .·· ·.·. •· .. :::.·.:.· j : -C.<•'• . -·-,·-·. ~~=1:al. ----rrr, • • L:J . . . ' ' ' ' ' i ill I •• ! CJ ! z I! ~ § ,-' ! ~ : z ! '!I <C ----' ~ n w ri; ~ i ;,; ~ ;!' ,-~ i ~ ~ z w '.. 1:1 ::! ~ C) ~ ~ a f De' EB w :o, OCB w " ' .. ''(_ .. . ~ L '/ .. • C ~, ~ a ·i i ~ ·i ! ; • ~-I! H ~~ ?i it ;H !I • H I' II ' • w .~ ' , ~ ; ~ H ~i ~[:ii I ..! ~ ~ 0 C, z !t ~ ~ :"i :"i IL IL w w [8 ~ ::, 0: I "' ~ "' ::, ~e g. ~~ Q ~ () C w- 0~ i . !iii ~ ! I' 11,1 !t ~ ~ <( ...J IL !z :"i ~ ~ ~ a: <( ~ ~ ~ we z. og ·- ill I •• ! "'"' I 475 450 425 0 50 secnoNA-A ""'"'"" .... SCAL.tc''-JO' 475 450 425 ! 0 50 SECTION 8-B ""'"1"''"-S£:Alf. ,. -J(l' 100 YERTICAI.SCAI.Ecl'•IO' """""'h l'LI) 100 l'!:RliC"-SCALE ' • I~' 150 200 150 200 250 250 300 TAANSIIISSION ""' CUAR~NCE ,~ 300 350 350 cot.1r.u.,n "°"" 400 400 I TRAN~;~s100 / "'="' 450 ' ' 450 es '" ;rr·c,, 500 550 600 500 550 600 .., • ._,.,,,o""" 475 450 425 650 475 450 425 650 VISUAL BARRIER PLANTI\G ::,LAN TALBOT "'1ILL SUBSIAT:ON i;; ':,;;: CAO -.;> ~CSAilT"l:NT ~ DATE" •= ,:';;~';..1::~:: U ·574E O 2j .--CNCINEE• -•El'l.-.to cu.,;,; S•1t • TJ.L ~ .,. •• <MD .,.,...,..,,..... - l, I r r ,\ \ I -=-z-= ' z 0 >-c, u '" ~ cc := ~ _, C ~ "" u .. ,_ >- I ·I I \ :J \ \ in 1-- ii:i :::c X w \ \ \. \ ' ill -- -=-z-= : ::\'.. ,fk~,. .,, ]h___ -1 : H:---II "-~.____ I ' 1? :, :11 .____ '-i ;::.·., , . I "'· .· 1, I ill I ·II I . . /1~ i ':' '.'.' ·II I 'I ' ' ' " I : : I ' • / .:.. :· ij I "1·•.:;t I I .. , ... ·. I I I '!s//i\ I ,. : : : ... ,,' . ' .. ,.,... \ I I I I I I I ~ I § I "" w-.,-, I ~~~ sou . " I '° z ~ I ~":5 NsU I I I I I I ' , , I . . l ' ' ' .. , z ~ I-u w V, ~~ :,,, W, >· "' Q w ;\. u z .. "' I-z w 1! ., ; . . , I~ ;. I e ~----~ ~--., , ... u [i __JI ~---.x/ ;: I ': I i 1 1 , I'-,' & ; : ' ,--., I ·., i "•""·· -1,-..J )·· J " ,O·" I i i \-········ Cl. " I' • ___ ... .1:.:,--···· + ~ : .j : ·1 r -· : I : i ' .:.·' ~ .. rl i i ' f,---····): j I - > > ~ ~ :·"/:~-~ j.;N""'" 1'---LIJ'; z --_: 6 I I ! ! ~ ~ ~1 w' " ' w' ~- ' ' ' § i ! i l I l I i i ' , ~ i ' ~ ! ~ w I 5 ·-i N w, ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ! ' I ! 0$ D ! ' ~ \ ' ,, - ' ' -,-_.. s1rr11:><Y""' "°"l" SIIIJT" 8U[UN[ MATCH LlNE ' t " ! I i -=-Z--= _)J .,....,_ - 30KV SIDE) !115KY SIDEJ --·~· -:ii '· . i:::::I ,----------~~ B :::::[: i:::::I :l ] --'LJ··· ' ' ' ·' "'£/ --'" ' .. ::::, ~-,:;:,;;;;~."""' ' -' --_J:'. [;' -~~':""'.'"'':: ' ill>~ -c C O ~:. 0 O o'~"<': 0 ,0 ',C' . . --::; IL ----: . -C -. -.. "i::. . :,· ;,> -.. -' --. "'" , .... 0 -: .. : : --,;,, ,;;. ;;::: '"" ' 0 0 0 0 .~---, "" .,, f_-_; 0 I / 0 Nf• 7' NIGi< S7A71 ... F"!HCE ( ·.~-.. " •rltf. 7YI' osc, 0-111•11· T~ ~_c ... """""" IN"""' •ucE !~ ~im,,.. FENCE, 'f"" ... ~~~.lt",r-:· .J:'"!-.:t Mc•, nPJIIIOO•O SUI lj[[ SHHI l, OEUtt 1l _J '!!'.c!" g' ,j., ' ' LEGEND: @!:ill --t-- ~ NOTE: '""' fl ,,.,rn, SIA!ION HSCL St(PIS ONO >LOW OIRECflCN F!llNOU:oos '"" °"' '' ORIYCr•' R<fLlCt Slol[OI< f[',CC '"" RE-ESH8LISe SNOO.O(n JN 110<; ,M). SO OTH,S 0RA01"0 ..... P~Ol'OSCO IN '1~<' ""° ..... , .. 0'""" cooc fE ,ecn, - REFERENCE DRAWINGS 0-101)0 sm LAYOUT ,so ""rn" ""'" ,_,,,,, 1, ... oa,., '""'""' ONO SEO]t<(N" CCNTROl """ 0•1'1'S lCU» FNJAO PtoN D-1'750 OSAl•AGt re•• 0 1'7'7 OE1ENJI(>< P0.0 PLO" 0•1'130 FOUHOATI°" e," C-11H9 SlRUCIOII'<. >L" C:ALL BEHIIE ('\I YOO DIG ,cal I: m.l FREE 1-~H24-5551, " M ""'"''"'""""'"'"" ,,.,.....,,,,,,)ni,~ 1 GRADING ANO ""_"...,w"'"-115KY SWITCHYARD :~ T FENCING PLAN 1""I Gi:tAP~_15, 0 sCALE "" ENGIN[[R It:.,"~'--, O£Yltl!:D aPo>ROVl:D TALBOT Hill SUBSTATION += "'"-"'"• lD'-o• °'""'''"''"'"'" ~uas,.r,,.. E•ornt[~IIIG [J[P•ATr.E~T CLm, SlTE 0 ; ! i ~ ,c!,. l'~'~!I l>l~IIHO "'""" '"'"' •• M£• y- COUASC.·, ..... mi NHIV>.SO[l '_;·•'•• OR c.-,cr,n BASE COUAs£ "EI .. Sl f ILL TYPICAL STATION SECTION DETAILCTXT) "" 1 "'""' '"° c,rc• a'""' ,,., , ""' tRA"" 1..0 .. ,TE UST INTO RISE.A\ .. """ COURSE ,• ctJW,CJ[D DEPhl ~t.H ;~;::.~~~ COlCH B•SIH, TYPF ! <e>• COO DEUll o-,, I NOTES: LD<ailtO OAATC IS OCOUIRCO ""'" OOYSIDE OF SLJ8Sl0l[ON HNCf i~:c ,~'7 ,f.,9~E,~~~c,: or ,(JiJ..,OTL~>. £tc TYPICAL CATCH BASIN GRADING OUTSIDE OF SPCC AREA DETAIL EB <" NCr YARD to,JHSC ,s'-o" GRlvl:Liiii'ivcw" ,,, .. I ~_,--,"fOPtDLIA'-' ..... , ,~DIUIM- ~~- (NATlvE CCN'.CTCO SLJBOS( OA C:a<P4C1EO SLJ8aASE su:f'E =-'°.!""" Qjio'" ~ , ..... """'"' ~A P5[ SlO lll~.•l20 •• Ho•, ORJ,lij•t• Pl•E SECT.ION Cf) SEE Pl.IN iiimi""ID ,...--7'NSOS SUTl,..CH"" ''""""t' '''"'""""" SIA'"'"' EE o-,s1,, • ,. N,• >ARO COYA5E -S.OO'SMID.DO'R '""'"OIJl<CI [;""'""""'"' .~~li~!i:"';) -Tf}"i ,.,..\ ···~ ~·-·= ,_,, . ~·-_,, il5, it ,,:'-', ','o;, "'-='' ' ' ' USE COURSE 11·, ""--c-lCTISD ';IJl:lAS[ GRAVEL DRIVEWAY ~.ECTION {V) __ .. ,,,02>'15 C.U.L B£F00E YIJJ OIG C<il 11 TCU fR([ l-800--j24-555~ P[Ml!T '"--ITTll GRADING SECTIONS AND DETAILS TALBOT HILL SUBSTATION ,,r IIIJ /YI += ,uesu, '°" 00 .. , ..... ' ' Z..e~,_ I/ ,,,r '"' EMO\ME£R!NG 0-18734 10 D£P .. HISMT ,-; ""-"!OE. '""'"" .. IP "', I Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Talbot Substation Improvements Renton, Washington for t Snunt! En.:·r/-. December 5, 2016 EXHIBIT 7 Entire Document Available Upon Request Technical Information Report Talbot Substation Stormwater Support Puget Sound Energy i/ _-,('· November 16, 2016 PSE Talbot Hill Substation Arborist Report 11241 wil/o~·s road ne suite 200 redmond, wa 98052 phone (425) 8224446 Assignment To: From: Jeff McMeekin, PSE Tom Early, Otak, Inc. Date: December 13, 2016 Project No.: 31983.h EXHIBIT 8 Entire Document Available Upon Request The arborist report is required to accompany a Renton Site Plan Review-submittal. It is developed to convey specific information regarding the trees proposed for removal, tree protection for trees to be retained and supplemental tree planting suggestions. I am coordinating the integration of tree removal, tree retention and tree protection into the landscape plans of the stormwater pond. Assessment Methods The inventory of trees was performed on October 13, 2016. The inventory is tabulated in the tree table which includes an assignment of tree number, identification of tree species by common and botanical names, diameter at breast height (D BH) measurement, a condition assessment using five categories (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor and Dead) based on visual tree inspection of each tree, comments specific to each trees condition and the proposal to either remove or retain the tree. In the case of trees with multiple stems, typically beaked hazelnut trees in this case, I've noted the approximate number of stems and the stems average size. Site description The site address is 3004 Beacon Way South. The location of the subject trees is along the south side and southeast comer of the PSE Talbot Hill Substation. The land surface is undulating with vegetation typical of upland plant species. See figure 1. The majority of the trees are in good shape with the exception of the willow and alder; they have been damaged by recent branch failures during the spring windstorms. K\prtjoct\31900\31983H\ProjcctDoa;\Rq,orts\ Talbot Hill Arborist Report.doc Construction Mitigation Description for PSE Talbot Hill Substation Proposed construction dates: This project is to be constructed in two phases. Phase one includes the civil portions of the job and is proposed for April 2017 to October 2017. Phase two includes assembly of the electrical equipment and is proposed for April 2018 to October 2018. Hours and days of operation: Hours and days of operation are to follow City of Renton normal working hours 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. Proposed hauling and transportation routes: The proposed haul route would be via Puget Drive and Benson Road. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust. traffic. mud. noise. etc.: A TESC plan will be developed and implemented during construction. Dust and mud should not enter the public road right of way. If debris track-out occurs, immediate corrections will be implemented. Any special hours proposed: There are no special hours proposed at this time. Preliminary traffic control plan: See attached traffic control plan. EXHIBIT 9 ADVISbRY NOTES TO APPLICA LUA 1'6-000922 --------Renton 0 Application Date: December 06, 2016 Name: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Site Address: 2400 S Puget Dr Renton, WA 98055-4311 Version 1 I Building Review -Planning Comments Contact: Craig Burnell I 425-430-7290 I cbumell@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Project will be reviewed for compliance with Building Codes. The current adopted building code is 2015 International Building Code. Recommendations of the geotechnical report must be followed as a condition of building permits. Geotechnical reoort should be uodated to 2015 IBC desian oarameters. Engineering Review Comments Contact: Ann Fowler I 425-430-7382 I afowler@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the Talbot Hill Substation at 2400 S Puget Drive (APN('s} 202305 9003, 9066, 9064) and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS The total site is approximately 50.4 acres acres in size and is irregular in shape. The site includes an existing substation wiU, access gravel driveways. The substation covers approximately 7. 75 acres of the total site area. Water No water service is proposed or required for the redevelopment project. EXHIBIT 10 Sewer No sewer service is proposed or required for the redevelopment project. Storm Runoff from the site sheet flows outward from the middle of the substation. There are existing drainage pipes on the northeast and southeast side of the substation which are tied to catch basins within the fence line. The rims of the catch basins are currently at an elevation higher than the surrounding ground, which prevents them from capturing stormwater. Grade differences between the substation slab and the surrounding ground surface along the north and northeast sides of the substation prevents stormwater from draining away from the substation and tends to pond within the substation footprint. Runoff along the southern edge of the substation flows into a culvert located beneath the access road which ultimately flows east towards Grant Avenue South. Streets The site is bordered by Beacon Way South to the northeast. Beacon Way South is classified as a Residential Access Road and is located within the City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline Easement. The site is bordered by Puget Drive Southeast to the south. Puget Drive Southeast is classified as a Minor Arterial Street. Existing right of way in Puget Drive Southeast is approximately 100 feet as measured using the King County Assessor's Map. There are no existing frontage improvements along Puget Drive Southeast. CODE REQUIREMENTS SURFACE WATER 1. A geotechnical report, dated December 5, 2016, completed by GeoEngineers, Inc. for the site has been provided. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). Erosion control measures will need to be in place prior to starting grading activities on the site. The report discusses the soil and groundwater characteristics of the site including infiltration potential and provides recommendations for project design and construction. The report discounts the use of infiltration for the site due to the depth of the outwash soils compared to the existing surface elevations present on the site. Geotechnical recommendations presented need to be address within the project plans. 2. A Preliminary Drainage Plan and Technical Information Report (TIR), dated November 16, 2016, was submitted by HDR Engineering, Inc. with the Land Use Application. Based on the City of Renton's flow control map, the site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard area matching Forested Site Conditions and is within the Lower Cedar River and Black River Drainage Basin. The development is subject to Full Drainage Review in accordance with the 2009 King County Surtace Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWOM. All core requirements and the six special requirements are discussed in the Technical Information Report. The following stormwater improvements are required and shall be discussed within the TIR: a. The applicant submitted a complete Condition Use Permit Application on December 6, 2016 and ls therefore vested to the 2009 KCSWDM and the 201 O City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM for a period of 180 days from the application date. The vesting period will expire on June 4, 2017 in accordance with RMC 4 1 045E.2.b. A complete Construction Permit Application must be received prior to the expiration date of the vesting period. Otherwise, the applicant will be required to comply with the stormwater manual that is in effect at the time of construction permit application. b. Appropriate flow control BMPs will be required to help mitigate the new runoff created by this development since the new plus replaced impervious area is over 2,000 square feet. A preliminary drainage plan, including the application of flow control BMPs, shall be included with the land use application, as applicable to the project. c. As noted in the report, the applicant is exempt from water quality since the new plus replaced pollution generating impervious surface (PGIS) area is less than 5,000 square feet. Any changes to the redevelopment project which results in greater than 5,000 square feet of PGIS area, as defined by the 2009 KCSWDM, may trigger water quality facilities to be provided. 3. The applicant has proposed installation of a new stormwater conveyance system inside the substation which will route flows to a new Ran: January 19, 2017 Page 1 of 2 r , ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLIC LUA 16-000922 --------Renton 0 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 I Engineering Review Comments Contact: Ann Fowler 1425-430-7382 I afowler@rentonwa,gov detention pond to be located at the sound end of the substation between the substation and the access road in order to mitigate the added impervious surface area of the redevelopment project. 4. All work proposed outside of the applicant's property will require a permanent drainage easement to be provided to the City and a temporary construction easement prior to any permits being issued. 5. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology is required since grading and clearing of the site exceeds one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site. 6. Surface water system development fee is $0.641 per square foot of new impervious surface, but not less than $1,608.00. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. TRANSPORTATION 1. Per City code 4 6 060, required half street frontage improvements shall include 54 ft of paved roadway width (27 ft from centerline), installation of a 0.5 foot curb, an 8 foot planting strip, an 8 foot sidewalk, street trees and storm drainage improvements. No right of way dedication is required. 2. Refer to City code 4 4 080 regarding driveway regulations. Driveways shall be designed in accordance with City standard plans 104.1 and 104.2. a, The maximum width of any driveway shall not exceed 30 feet at the right of way line, b. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 5 feet from property lines. c. Maximum driveway slope is 8%. 3. Paving and trench restoration shall comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements for any work within the City right of way, GENERAL COMMENTS 1. When utility plans are complete, please submit tour (4) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, one (1) complete electronic submittal (drawings and drainage report), the permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. Please visit the Development Engineering Forms page for the most up to date plan submittal requirements: http://rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=42473 2. Adequate separation between utilities as well as other features shall be provided in accordance with code requirements. 3. All construction utility permits for utility and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall confirm to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. 4. A final survey that is stamped and signed by the professional land surveyor of record will need to be provided. All existing utilities need to be surveyed and shown. Please reference COR Maps for mapping and records of existing utilities in the project vicinity. 5. A landscaping plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. Each plan shall be on separate sheets. 6. All utility lines (i.e. electrical, phone, and cable services, etc.) serving the proposed development must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton inspector. 7. Fees quoted in this document reflect the fees applicable in the year 2017 only and will be assessed based on the fee that is current at the time of the permit application or issuance, as applicable to the pennit type. Please visit www.rentonwa.gov for the current development fee schedule. Ran: January 19, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Talbot Substation Improvements Renton, Washington for Puget Sound Energy December 5, 2016 1-)~ EXHIBIT 7 Entire Document Available Upon Request Technical Information Report Talbot Substation Stormwater Support Puget Sound Energy 1:, . November 16, 2016 PSE Talbot Hill Substation Arborist Report • To: Jeff McMeekin, PSE From: Tom Early, Otak, Inc. 11241 willu,n road ne tttite 200 Date: December 13, 2016 redHJond, wa 98052 ph,we (425) 8224446 Project No.: 31983.h Assignment EXHIBIT 8 Entire Document Available Upon Request The arborist report is required to accompany a Renton Site Plan Review submittal. It is developed to convey specific informatiqn regarding the trees proi:x:,sed for removal, tree protection for trees to be retained and supplemental tree planting suggestions. I am coordinating the integration of tree removal, tree retention and tree protection into the landscape plans of the stormwater pond. Assessment Methods The inventory of trees was performed on October 13, 2016. The inventory is tabulated in the tree table wuch includes an as:,ignment of tree number, identification of tree species by common and botanical names, diameter at breast height ()) BH) measurement, a condition as:sessment using five categories (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor and Dead) based on visual tree inspection of each tree, comments specific to each trees condition and the proposal to either remove or retain the tree. In the case of trees with multiple sterns, typically beaked hazelnut trees in this case, I've noted the approximate number of sterns and the sterns average size. Site description The site address is 3004 Beacon Way South. The location of the subject trees is along the south side and southeast corner of the PSE Talbot Hill Substation. The land surface is undulating with vegetation typical of upland plant species. See figure 1. The majority of the trees are in good shape with the exception of the willow and alder; they have been damaged by recent branch failures during the spring 'Nindstorms. K:\project\31900\31983H\Prqa.tDocs\Reports\Taloot Hill Arborist ReJX)rt.ck:x:: Construction Mitigation Description for PSE Talbot Hill Substation Proposed construction dates: This project Is to be constructed In two phases. Phase one Includes the civil portions of the Job and Is proposed for Aprll 2017to October 2017. Phase two Includes assembly of the electrical equipment and is proposed for April 2018 to October 2018. Hours and days of operation: Hours and days of operation are to follow City of Renton normal working hours 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. Proposed hauling and transportation routes: The proposed haul route would be via Puget Drive and Benson Road. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust. traffic. mud. noise. etc.: A TESC plan will be developed and implemented during construction. Dust and mud should not enter the public road right of way. If debris track-out occurs, immediate corrections will be implemented. Any special hours proposed: There are no special hours proposed at this time. Preliminary traffic control plan: See attached traffic control plan. EXHIBIT 9 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA 16-000922 -------Renton 0 Application Date: December 06, 2016 Name: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PLAN • Planning Review· Land Use Site Address: 2400 S Puget Dr Renton, WA 98055-4311 Version 1 Building Review. Planning Comments Contact: Craig Bumell 1425-430-7290 I cbumell@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Project will be reviewed for compliance with Building Codes. The cu1Tent adopted building code is 2015 International Building Code. Recommendations of the geotechnlcal report must be followed as a condition of building permits. Geotechnlcal re rt should be u dated to 2015 lBC desi n arameters. Engineering Review Comments Contact: Ann Fowler 1425-430-73821 afowler@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the Talbot Hill Substation at 2400 S Puget Drive (APN('s) 202305 9003, 9066, 9064} and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS The total site is approximately 50.4 acres acres in size and is irregular in shape. The site Includes an existing substation with access gravel driveways. The substation covers approximately 7.75 acres of the total site area. Water No water service is proposed or required for the redevelopment project. EXHIBIT 10 Sewer No sewer service is proposed or required for the redevelopment project. Storm Runoff from the site sheet flows outward from the middle of the substation. There are existing drainage pipes on the northeast and southeast side of the substation which are tied to catch basins within the fence line. The rims of the catch basins are currently at an elevation higher than the surrounding ground, which prevents them from capturing stormwater. Grade differences between the substation slab and the surrounding ground surface along the north and northeast sides of the substation prevents stonnwater from draining away from the substation and tends to pond within the substation footprint Runoff along the southern edge of the substation flows into a culvert located beneath the access road which ultimately flows east towards Grant Avenue South. Streets The site is bordered by Beacon Way South to the northeast. Beacon Way South is classified as a Residential Access Road and Is located within the City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline Easement. The site is bordered by Puget Drive Southeast to the south. Puget Drive Southeast is dassified as a Minor Arterial Street. Existing right of way in Puget Drive Southeast is approximately 100 feet as measured using the King County Assessor's Map. There are no existing frontage improvements along Puget Drive Southeast. CODE REQUIREMENTS SURFACE WATER 1. A geotechnical report, dated December 5, 2016, completed by GeoEngineers, Inc. for the site has been provided. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). Erosion control measures will need to be in place prior lo starting grading activities on the site. The report discusses the soil and groundwater characteristics of the site induding infiltration potential and provides recommendations for project design and construction. The report discounts the use of infiltration for the site due to the depth of the ovtwash soils compared to the existing surface elevations present on the site. Geotechnical recommendations presented need to be address within the project plans. 2. A Preliminary Drainage Plan and Technical Information Report (TIR), dated November 16, 2016, was submitted by HDR Engineering, Inc. with the Land Use Application. Based on the City of Renton's flow control map, the site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard area matching Forested Site Conditions and is within the Lower Cedar River and Black River Drainage Basin. The development is subject to Full Drainage Review in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. All core requirements and the six special requirements are discussed in the Technical Information Report. The following stormwater improvements are required and shall be discussed within the TIR: a. The applicant submitted a complete Condition Use Permit Application on December 6, 2016 and is therefore vested to the 2009 KCSWDM and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM fora period of 180 days from the application date. The vesting period will expire on June 4, 2017 in accordance with RMC 4 1 045E.2.b. A complete Construction Permit Application must be received prior to the expiration date of the vesting period. Otherwise, the applicant will be required to compty with the stormwater manual Ulat is in effect at the time of construction permi1 application. b. Appropriate flow control BMPs will be required to help mitigate the new runoff created by this development since the new plus replaced impervious area is over 2,000 square feet. A preliminary drainage plan, including the application of flow control BMPs, shall be included with the land use application, as applicable to the project. c. As noted in the report, the applicant is exempt from water quality since the new plus replaced pollution generating impervious surface {PGIS) area is less than 5,000 square feel Any changes to the redeveloflment project which results in greater than 5,000 square feet of PGIS area, as defined by the 2009 KCSWDM, may trigger water quality facilities to be provided. 3. The applicant has proposed installation of a new stonnwater conveyance system inside the substation which will route flows to a new Ran: January 19, 2017 Page 1 of2 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT LUA 16-000922 -------Renton© PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 Engineering Review Comments Contact: Ann Fowler I 425-430-7382 I afowler@rentonwa.gov detention pond to be located at the sound end of the substation between the substation and the access road in order to mitigate the added impervious surface area of the redevelopment project 4. All work proposed outside of the applicanfs property will require a permanent drainage easement to be provided lo the City and a temporary construction easement prior to any permits being issued. 5. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology is required since grading and clearing of the site exceeds one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site. 6. Surface water system development fee is $0.641 per square foot of new Impervious surface. but not less than $1,608.00. This is payable prior to Issuance of the construction permit. TRANSPORTATION 1. Per City code 4 6 060, required half street frontage improvements shall include 54 ft of paved roadway width (27 ft from centerline), installation of a 0.5 foot curb, an 8 foot planting strip, an 8 foot sidewalk, street trees and storm drainage improvements. No right of way dedication is required. 2. Refer to City code 4 4 080 regarding driveway regulations. Driveways shall be designed in accordance with City standard plans 104.1 and 104.2. a. The maximum width of any driveway shall not exceed 30 feet at the right of way line. b. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 5 feet from property lines. c. Maximum driveway slope is 8%. 3. Paving and trench restoration shall comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements for any work within the City -~-I GENERAL COMMENTS 1. When utility plans are complete. please submit four (4) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, one (1) complete electronic submittal (drawings and drainage report), the permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. Please visit the Development Engineering Forms page for the most up lo date plan submittal requirements: http://rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=42473 2. Adequate separation between utilities as well as other features shall be provided in accordance with code requirements. 3. All construction utility permits for utility and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall confirm to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. 4. A final survey that is stamped and signed by the professional land surveyor of record wilt need to be provided. All existing utilities need to be surveyed and shown. Please reference COR Maps for mapping and records of existing utilities in the project vicinity. 5. A landscaping plan shall be induded with the civil plan submittal. Each plan shall be on separate sheets. 6. All utility lines (i.e. electrical, phone, and cable services, etc.) serving the proposed development must be underground. The constructlon of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton inspector. 7. Fees quoted in this document reflect the fees applicable in the year 2017 only and will be assessed based on the fee that is current at the time of the permit application or issuance, as applicable to the permit type. Please visit www.rentonwa.gov for the current development fee schedule. Ran: January 19, 2017 Page 2 of 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ------Renton® ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA16-000922 Jeff McMeekin, Puget Sound Energy Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr. (parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The proposed new control house exceeds the maximum height for accessory structures within the R-8 zone, and therefore requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The existing 230kV substatio~ equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. The proposal includes some transmission line work outside the substation fence; however, no additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which will trigger SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 63 trees. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within SO feet). The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: 2400 S Puget Dr. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on Febraury 10, 2017. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 27, 2017 JANUARY 23, 2017 EXHIBIT 12 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SIGNATURES: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Public Works Department ------------1-,~ --~ Date Rick M. Marshall, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services i~ziLL ~;f1.l~ ,o.;,;};f ~je; fr,- Department of Community & Economic Development )> CD ""'l - 11) ""O ;;r- 0 ..... 0 (./) ;;r- 0 ~ :::l (0 z ~ C ..... !l) < CD (.Q CD ...+ !l) =!". 0 :, (./) () ""'l Cl) CD :, :, (.Q !<JI ~ " 10) z "' "' m g ~ 'I, :5:-!i ,' ~; I ~ ----0 --<£,. ------@ -' 'c., "' D C: --< :,: m r m ~ --< 6 z :~ I• I~ [-' ~~ '" " ci1~ ,, z ,, ,1 D "' ' cl 8 :,: m r m ~ ~ --< 6 z '~· 111m-_ "' __ ,,i __ t.--~ ~ :-8 ' I l From: Gambill, Bob [mailto:Bob.Gambill@seattle.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 2:45 PM To: Angelea Weihs Cc: Gambill, Bob Subject: LUA 16-000922 ECF SA·H PSE Talbot Hill Substation Angelea, Please make me a "party of Record" to received further information on this project. Please see the attached Map labeled "Seattle Public Utilities Right of Way Ortho Map." Seattle Public Utilities' Cedar River Water Transmission Pipelines Right of Way is adjacent to the PSE Project Area. The Right of Way looks like a road, but it cannot be used like a road. The right of way contains 3 very large underground water transmission pipelines: 66", 52" and a 42" in diameter. 2/3 of the water supply for approximately 800,000 people living in western King County is delivered through these pipelines. Vibrations and heavy loads could damage these pipelines. Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent Seattle Public Utilities P.O. Box 34018 Seattle WA 98124-4018 206-684-5969 bob.gambill@seattle.gov EXHIBIT 15 2 Angelea Weihs From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Angelea, Gambill, Bob < Bob.Gambill@seattle.gov> Thursday, January 26, 2017 4:00 PM Angelea Weihs Gambill, Bob RE: LUA 16-000922 ECF SA-H PSE Talbot Hill Substation Public Comment Response letter.pd! Follow up Completed Thank you very much for following up and getting back to me. If no activities are planned that involve the City of Seattle right of way, I am not concerned. For your information, and you may want to pass it along to PSE, the SITE PLAN "TALBOT HILL SUBSTATION" incorrectly identifies the City of Seattle's Cedar River Pipeline right of way as "66' BPA EASEMENT" and also indicates SEATTLE CITY LIGHT as owner. ' Thank you Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent Seattle Public Utilities P.O. Box 34018 Seattle WA 98124-4018 206-684-5969 bob.gambill@seattle.gov From: Angelea Weihs [mailto:AWeihs@Rentonwa.gov) Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 4:44 PM To: Gambill, Bob <Bob.Gambill@seattle.gov> Subject: RE: LUA 16-000922 ECF SA-H PSE Talbot Hill Substation Hello Bob, See the attached response (with attachments) to your comments. You will receive a hard copy in the mail shortly. Let me know if you have any questions, Angelea Weihs © Associate Planner, City of Renton 425.430. 7312 I Denis Law Mayor January 26, 2017 Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent Seattle Public Utllitles P .o. Box 34018 Seattle WA 98124-4018 SUBJECT: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements comment response letter LUAl&-000922, ECF, SA-H, Dear Bob Gambill: Thank you for your comments related to the Talbot Hill Substation Improvements as part of the public comment period. Your email, dated December 28, 2016, specified concerns about the Seattle Public Utilities' Cedar River Water Transmission Pipelines Right of Way, which is adjacent to the Talbot Hill Substation Project Area. You specifically mentioned a concern about PSE/substation- related traffic using the Seattle Public Utilities Right of Way for vehicle access. The Talbot Hill substation property is accessed via an existing access driveway extending from S Puget Drive (See the attached site plan and proposed access improvements). As part of the project, the applicant is proposing improvements to the existing access driveway that includes repaving with asphalt, widening of the approach apron, and a security gate. The access driveway will remain in its current location. Thank you for providing comments. If you would like to review the project file, the submitted documents are available on the 61h Floor of City Hall. You have been added as a Party of Record to receive notifications as the project moves through the application process. Si/)_ ~wVAA- Angelea Weihs Associate Planner cc: File 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov Talbot Project Narrative • Project Name: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements • Proposed Scope of Work: The proposal is to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation, to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence will be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. Some transmission line work outside the substation fence may be required however no additional transmission lines will be added with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 120 trees. Additional driveway improvements are required to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. • • • • • • • • • • • • Size: The project site totals 50.4 acres. In order to accomplish this total disturbed area will equal approximately 227,370 square feet. The cut will be about 11,500 cubic yards and fill of about 9,000 cubic yards. After construction the area of impervious surface will equal about 78,131 square feet and the pervious surface: 149,238 square feet. Location: The site is located atl2400 S Puget Drive on parcels 2023059003, 2023059066iand 2023059064. Land Use Permits Required: Site Plan Review with SEPA. Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit Zoning designation for site: Residential -8 Zoning for surrounding properties: Residential-8, Resource Conservation Current Use: Utility Special site features: Sensitive slopes, landslide hazards and coal mine hazards mapped Soil type and drainage conditions: See attached drainage report Proposed Use: Utility, unchanged Total estimated construction cost: Unknown at this time Fair market value of proposal: $6.7M Trees to be removed: There are 97 significant trees on-site -80 at the stormwater pond site and 17 in the area of selective removal. We are proposing to remove 63 significant trees and retain 34. See attached arborist report for detailed information. • Job shack or trailer location: Unknown at this time; to be determined by contractor. • Proposed modification and stream or wetlands: There are no known wetlands or streams in the project vicinity. The substation improvements, with the exception of the stormwater pond, will remain within the existing fenced area. • Existing Access: There are no proposed off-site improvements, no land dedicated to the city. o Regarding Note 16 in Title Report: PSE's legal and physical access to all three parcels noted above is off the north side of Puget Drive SE at 2023059064. EXHIBIT 16 Conditional Use Permit Justification (Control House'): • Consistency with Plans and Regulations: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton. Response: The proposed use is not changing. The proposal includes replacing an existing control house within the Talbot Hill substation with a new control house. The use is compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton. The Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan states: The Utilities Element guides future utility service within Renton's planning area and ensures that adequate utility services will be available to support existing and future development in the City. The goals and policies included in the Utilities Element are designed to promote efficient, cost effective utility service while meeting community needs and protecting both existing neighborhoods and the nature environment. The proposal complies with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: Policy U-7: Non-City utility systems should be constructed in a manner that minimizes negative impacts to existing development and should not interfere with operation of City utilities. City development regulations should otherwise not limpair the ability of utility providers to adequately serve customers. Goal U-0: Promote the availability of safe, adequate, and efficient electrical service within the City and its planning area, consistent with the regulatory obligation of the utility to serve customers. Policy U-72: Coordinate with local and regional utility providers to ensure the siting and location of transmission and distribution facilities is accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts to the environment and adjacent land uses. Policy U-73: Encourage electricity purveyors to make facility improvements and additions within existing utility corridors whenever possible. The proposed control house structure will replace an existing control house within the Talbot Hill substation fence. The proposal will have little to no impact on adjacent residential, as the existing use of the site will not change. The control house will replace an existing structure and be located adjacent to the existing structure. There are existing transmission corridors between the substation and neighboring residential properties. The City of Renton has determined that a control house is an accessory building to the substation use. The maximum wall plate in the R-8 zone for an accessory building is 12 feet. The proposed control house wall plate is 11 feet. However, since the overall height exceeds more than 6 feet above the wall plate (RMC 4-2-llOD.18 Vertical Projections from Wall Plates), the City determined that Conditional Use Permit approval is required for the new control house structure. The proposed control house will comply with all other applicable dimensional standards of the R-8 zone. As evidenced through this analysis, the proposed control house is consistent with the Conditional Use Permit decision criteria outlined in RMC 4-9-030.D. 1 A substation control house is a shelter containing equipment necessary to monitor and control the operation of the substation. At smaller or older substations this usually takes the form of a weather-protective cabinet, where maintenance and operation of control equipment can be performed by technicians standing outside, and reaching into, the cabinet ("house"). At larger or newer substations, which require more complex control and control-related communications equipment, this will necessarily take the form of a larger weather-protective shelter, which technicians may enter into to service and operate the equipment. This shelter is solely for the purpose of containing the control equipment; compared to other work or storage spaces, a control house is entered only while actively servicing the equipment it contains. • Appropriate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location shall be suited for the proposed use. Response: The proposed location of the control house will not result in detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area. The proposed control house will replace an existing control house within the substation fence. The increased building square footage is minor compared to the scale of the substation footprint. The new control house will be located adjacent to the existing structure used for a control house and will not be substantially larger in size. • Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. Response: The proposed control house will not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The proposed control house will replace an existing control house adjacent to the current structure location within the existing substation fence. The substation is located within a 50 acre site that contains several transmission lines. The substation is located over 460 feet from the nearest residential lot, resulting in no substantial impact to neighboring properties. • Compatil:lility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. Response: The proposed use is compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. Talbot Substation is an existing station that was constructed in the early 1960's. There is an existing control house structure within the substation fence that's use will be replaced with the new structure. The substation is over 460 feet from the nearest residential lot and completely surrounded by transmission corridors. The proposed control house is part of the same use that has been on the site for more than 50 years. • Parking: Adequate parking is, or will be made, available. Response: Adequate parking will be provided for the proposed control house. The existing and proposed control houses are visited by maintenance personnel on a weekly basis and not occupied fulltime. Adequate existing parking is provided for the substation use. • Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and shall mitigate potential effects on the surrounding area. Response: The proposed control house will not result in increased traffic to and from the substation site. Impacts to the surrounding area are not anticipated. • Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use shall be evaluated and mitigated. Response: The proposed control house will have minimal lighting to provide for safe entry and exit into and out of the building. The lighting will be directed downward and not directed offsite. Noise generated by the proposed control house is within the limits allowed by the City's noise ordinance. • Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings, paving, or critical areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Response: This conditional use approval only covers the proposed control house within the substation fence. The area outside the substation fence is landscaped in compliance with applicable codes and standards. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS} A r.,ano, Applbtl°" h>< IIMn llled ind auepttel wlth m, O.pa<lmom or Commun~ & E,onoml< Drillopm"'' 100)-Pia«IIO(D..,.;onolffl, Cityo!-. lbo 1<,!owlt'lbno!ly~ribo,the,pplitotion and th• """"""'l' N,I~--, .. DOTl:Df'-'0110: OFAl'PUU.TION i'.>«<mt.e,-11, 20l6 PROJECT NOMt, PROJECT DU01l'11D1t, •s,, ,, rOQllffieoi H••ncg E,..m,norCanc!·t,,,,,.I U" Pi!tffl;t, Emo,on......ul (X••I Rowe .... ,'Kl~" Pt,n R...-;.wtt,. p<O~ faibotH11l:;.ab>1;1tionimpro .. mont:i lo<atod a! 1000; Pu1« o, (po"<I numb<r, 100.Jlll~l aod lD130<;90661-T~ i,rojoc: '"" total> :,0 4 ae<e< aod ~ ione<I R .. ~,1-8 IR·!I 1'5> " ~rooo-l<l ,_, portJonofth< !oll>o<Hrn s..o,t,n""' ,nol\ler to~°"' ,1,n10Gu;pmont111Uwovide rn0<• ,oliabo;t'j lo, th• tran,m""°" inr.; connocted to tho l<Jb>tat,on The exi<tln1 :antrol house .WI bo Mmoli,hed and > new CQmto{ IIOIJ>O ..,,10< con<trU<Ud n ,t, !"K<", Th• propo>e<l new contrOI hou .. 1>:<eed> tho maximum h~ lo, .,,.,,.,,., ,m,crum wea,n th< R-8 ,on,, ,od therelo,e ~"~" ,pp"""" of• Ho•fin1 Exam....-Cond;to>..i U,o Pi,rm,~ n,., ,~,rin,!. 230kV '""""'"'" equ,pmoot ;,.,,de the 1,m:• ,< pfO!>O,ed l<l bo, remo,&c!, ;nciudm5 <1""1 «ructlJ= "d fo\Jnd,tH>"< Th,,..., -ipm,,nt w.1> be .--nl1uf0d to «eat•, m0tt 1/fic,ert!: .,,d ''"'"'"'ll>ble ,utr.tat,on >nd >llow 1o, lle,,ble fwna,ani"lf of,,. ..,.,.,,, n-., o<opc,ul mdud<> "'"'" tr>n,mi.~on 1;oe .. "'~ o•tsido tho ,ub<tarion 1<,n«, how0,.,,,"" addit oru,I """""'"'""lines"" propooecl witll the .-.bu,1d of tt,;, oroi«t A~ ,tom, o,a,n•&• '"""' ,.,, t,e conrtnict<d "''""' ""' ten<e'J ar•• ,nd , do!Onuon pood wm b• ir,,talled "'"'" of th1 ,oe\het~ ,.,b,l;lt,on fence Th• ;.,erruon pood .. ;i1 ,..,.,1,,. '" ""c,v""'" or mo,. H,an '>00 rui.c ,aro,,wh~, ,d ttiu,,r 5EPA ~..,.,._ n,, ,uo,i.,a.nloolpirrt w!E roma,,, unch.1"100-Th• s:o,m "1lp<O'iement; w,11,oquir• :he r,mo,alo!6l cr...,, Mdi"on•I o~ .. w•v ,mp<OYffllont> ane p•ooo~ "' ,iow lar1er vet,;do •=> to tn, ,ub,ta,lon. Tlle p<OJKI •~• ,onta;n, modor>"' "'""""" h•tan:i~ rnode,-oto i.,<1<1;d• ha1.,d,. aod ,.,,.,.;,. ,lope, lwith,r Sol '"'I Th••~=< ho• <ub•w<ed an A."°r.,t Re,,.,,t and Goo,ochn><0I tng,nttrinK Swa,,' w,1h th• •opl;mlM PROJECT LOCATIOPI l400SP.,..,o,.,,. Ql'TIONAl 0ITT1•1,u~ATION Of NDN-S1GN1f1'4HCE lDN5), /,,> ,,. l.nd Aa••cv, the U,,, ol R,nton h,< '""'"''"" '"" ~1n,f,<MI: 0,nnrnn~I ,mparu '" ,..,1,1,i, «> ro...t: f<om tO< p,op,»O<I proj<CI. lho,olo,e,., p<m,11\eO """" tr, RCW •l llC.llO, th• (,ty ol """'"";, u,ing the Optional 11"5 oroc"" ,o rt,,. c.ot,ce "'" • ""S" l,k,ly lo I>< lno,11 Commenc por,ocf1 fl,,-v,, <>'OJ«' >nd the pro~ CNS aro 1nt<1r,!ed ,oto • ~Oifl• C,mment P'"Od Th•re .,;;1 o, no ,omm,'"' ,.,,od fdlow;n~ th,'""'"" M,,, T~hold Oe<orm,nlt,on of Non-~;1,,fican,:, (ON$) TO~ ""1 O< t"< onl,app<>rtun,ty lo commonton v,, e=ronmontal ,mpact, oltOe o,op<><al A 1.4-<I•, ,Op<al P••iod "111 loll°"' :oe,,;uaoceo!th<ON$ NOTICE DF CIIMP\liTE ... PUCATION -i.~w,;i.,.....,...., p,.,,..,.,c1,ya1 R1r>tDn/1~s, s Gr,<11 w,1/ "'"'"" WA 9IIOS7/ 42S-01Hll2/ -o;h,@lrontoowo.eov 11,ou .,<,ldil'Ato o, """', p,cryofr,«orc!!O'<ce<V<>h.M<r olo,n,.t,onanth"ocooo><il <>'Oitt1, co,i,pleteth" (o,r,, ,nil ,etum o, Cltyot a,n•.oo, {Efl -Ol,nn1n10,.,s,o,, )O<;<; So O:IN'/ w,,. lle<>f<>n, WA~l'l51 ~•=/',, No. LYO!~OOO~l>. ELF.~-~-Tiibo! Mdl SuOii,t,on :r,o,o-"eet< "'Al'J"'GAODREIS --------__ C.ty/Stat</Zip ---- TEC[PHIINENO __ -------- CONSITT>Na CVERlltEW· ~tJCluodV,., ~tmrnn..-lDo«,m .. """' E.,luotothel'f..,.,...r~ Arborl,t'• """""'· ""'"''' "°P>rt, G-hnlcol R,port o.i,,,tmon! of O,mmun,ty & '"""""'' o...,_. ... (CUii -Pl•n•1n1 lllwloion,§;nh R<><><-City floll, 1D55 South G,ad,jW~. "'"'°" WA _, F'ubl1<h11n"I I' lc'!liltt!'YKlm'1rr1 fmf,tm,..,,. 10\1 bolo•~....!£~ Hoafin1 f•>m•"l'• ;n Rffll'Qo '@nd' Chambm at l1 DO ,rn on ;h, 1th "oo, uf ~ento, (",t,j "»I locateo at IOSS Sooth Grady w,, Toe <ubject. ~to ., de, pmed R6<1ontlot Modium Otmit"< on 10< C,t, uf ••oton C,,mo,.h,n,i,o land u,e 1.1,p •nd Rolidon!ial ldu/ot on U,o City', !orna1M•p Camm..,,,,_ on the at,o,,, -'i<an"" ""'" "* ,u-.i In wrltlns to An11lu w,a,,, -•I f'la•n<,, ag - l'!.attnlns: ~, Joi;• Souff, ~ WO!, Reo""', WA-,. by 5,111) PM on Jan1wy s, 2017. Tbl• mm.-a obo ~ Kheduled h>ropubli<t..ari"ll oo -...,.,.14, 2011 .. 11,ooam, <;,;,un"I Oiamb"", s .. •mh Floor, ~•nton Ot/ H.JI, lOS5 S<-ulh Grxj W.y, !ltnt<tn. If r,u '"' '"'"~'° •n a!!eod,nl tl>o h<ano,i. pie.,, urnlact the P<,nnmi o,,,,.on to'"'""' that the "'"""I ha,...,, l>Hn rei<hodulod il (4.5) 430.(;078. ''"'""'i"-ll the'"'"'"'" or the S<PA Oot,rmnaoon. ,ou ..., «ill•<'<"'" at the h•ati•I >nd p,.,.m r,ur comm•nt> nr1a,dln1 tt,, pn>po,al b<(ore tr, Ho,rin1 uan,;""' If yuu ,._ q,=!,on> >bout !lus p,op0$al, o, ,.;..n m t,e mad• , pa.., of roco,d and"'"'" oddi:iooal ,nlorma:,oo by""'~ pl .. ,. contact tho> ora,KI '"""I"· lln)'OM who '"brn,ts wrin•n ,om•'<nts w;11 ~"""""°"fi<t>,.com,apac,yofn-cord,ndw;11,....,hfi,d,,foov-nonth"o'uJect CONTACT PERSON: Angelea Weihs, Assi..tant Planner; Tel: (425J 430-7312; EmJ: aweihs@rentonwa.gov CERTIFICATION I, tjmtfR.l?I t )t(b,$ , hereby certify that _J_ copies of the above document were p6sted in _J_ conspicuous places or nearby th0~roperty /" I A', L, Date: ("l /-zzp!?ff,::;, Signed:-1--~-,,L---"~=:::.._:=--_;{_.,,,__j=---=~:...:::..:~==---- STATE OF WASHINGTON 55 COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that lu::,..,O, c, ,,.-\.J J f , 63 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be ~;;;)free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. blic in and for the State of Washington Date_~;,~:l.') 1 d--O\~ ---<'o;.~ .. ~1,,. !T+0, Ill~ '~J:,~~~~~1 .<t 1 My appoin;:::~e~;ii~:~: t:~}j~;a::~o l3: -,,, ,. '" ----~~ ......... """ .... ---'->'""+--'"'"""'-'---'-------- !) '""""'"'Iii (!, .:::: :,::-WASI-I\~ ,$" ,,, ''"'''' On the 22th day of December, 2016, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached Jeff McMeekin Contact Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Owner # -f r , . _ ~\..~'~i}.'!,,,, (Signature of Sender): ~gAM,\.'rl_.... ~ ,.'5-;,:.t~i,?'~'~ =o~ OTA. ,,i~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) :c" + ..,..._ l\ ~ ) Ss r, ~ -• -.. ; ~ --1 ~ ,o E ~ COUNTY OF KING ) .. '\ ",, ,, c,8 L1c. _h.,,, :: . .,(\ ,, (,T,_., 1 ,...-- ':. , 11,,, <9·1 O :: '. /,. O.,c:,, lltt\\"""''" G<., a- l certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the forego(r\g, i~ ~~ct, I know or have satisfactory evidence t · irante-· -:::S-"' .,,..,-f..,, C-,,h~r-o -:')' 1111 1\\\\\''" signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be er their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: \0., ce ffi~tlb ;2,;;, J.D\C, I Notary (Print): ___ A-,._,_~"Ys~.~o ··"\\,i,,=~~-Y~,-JW~',,<;~>~---------- My appointment expires: , . ·-cs"",f.J ;),G( J ::)01 T Talbot Hill Substation Improvements LUA16-000922, ECF, SA-A, CU-H template. affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSOOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Jalaine Madura, Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology** Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.** Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program** 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Laura Murphy Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division* Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program** Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015 172nd Avenue SE 2015. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 WDFW • Larry Fisher* Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Charlene Anderson, AICP, ECO Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official 355 110'" Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Mailstop EST llW Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Energy Doug Corbin, Municipal liaison Mgr. 6905 South 2281h St Kent, WA 98032 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecyw~._Kov ** Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us / Laura.mur:.ph,y.@rnuckleshoot.nsn.us / erin .s I ateri@,m uckles hoot. nsn .us ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacl:;'nter@dn.r.wa.gov template • affidavit of service by mailing 0007200048 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 0007200195 MUCKERHEIDE THOMAS F 1017 High Ave S RENTON, WA 98055 0007200196 RESIDENT 907 Renton Ave S LOT Renton 1 WA 98057 0007200196 RESIDENT 901 Renton Ave S LDT Renton, WA 98057 2023059003 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059010 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059050 PUGET SOUND ENERGY /ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059062 RESIDENT 2500 SE Royal Hills Dr Renton, WA 98055 2023059066 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059080 N/A WA-WOODCLIFFE THOMSON REUTERS PTS (WELLS) 2235 FARADAY AVE SUITE 0 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 0007200191 VU THERESA CAT 1005 GRANT AVES RENTON, WA 98057 0007200196 SOUND & STEVE LLC 21222 132ND AVE SE KENT, WA 98042 0007200196 RESIDENT 913 Renton Ave 5 LOT Renton, WA 98057 2023059001 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PD BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059003 RESIDENT 2400 S puget Dr LOT Renton, WA 98055 2023059012 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059051 SEATTLE CITY OF SPU-WTR 700 5TH AVE STE 4900-RPS PO BOX 34018 SEATTLE, WA 98124 2023059064 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059070 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V202 Renton, WA 98055 0007200192 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 0007200196 RESIDENT 919 Renton Ave S LOT Renton, WA 98057 0007200196 RESIDENT 1003 Renton Ave 5 LOT Renton, WA 98057 2023059002 PUGET SOUND ENERGY /ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059005 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059013 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059059 RESIDENT 720 Jones Ave S Renton, WA 98057 2023059066 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059073 N/A WA-WOODCLIFFE THOMSON REUTERS PTS (WELLS) 2235 FARADAY AVE SUITE 0 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT VlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U103 Renton, WA 980S5 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APTT306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Aves APT nos Renton 1 WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT XlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT WlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT UlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT TlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V205 Renton, WA 980SS 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT XlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT T305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT U303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT X202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APTT205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT W302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT VlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT W202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT WlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT XlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT V203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDE.NT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT X202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APTY303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Tl03 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APTT203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W103 Renton, WA 980SS 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT V205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X204 Renton, WA 9805S 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V304 Renton, WA 98D55 2023059080 RESIDENT 120D Grant Ave S APT YlOl Renton, WA 98055 202305908D RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W304 Renton 1 WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U201 Renton, WA 9805S 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT TlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT TlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059D80 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT YlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT U204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APTT303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT VlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT V206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave 5 APT T202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT W201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT V302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT XlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT UlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT X304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Ul03 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT T204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059080 RESIDENT 1200 Grant Ave S APT Y304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059104 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT S206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT ClOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT L302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059109 RESIDENT 2401 Puget Dr SE Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT FlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L20S Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT Fl03 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT ClOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 N/A WA-WOODCLIFFE THOMSON REUTERS PTS (WELLS) 2235 FARADAY AVE SUITE 0 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 2023059111 RESIDENT 120S Grant Ave S APT P303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT KlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N105 Renton, WA 980SS 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT B203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 0103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT B103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT HlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 0204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J!Ol Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT J203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT AlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT B304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT (204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT A303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L30S Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT (201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT PlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT F202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT B101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 120S Grant Ave S APT 0304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 8302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 6202 Renton, WA 980SS 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H 103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT S302 Renton 1 WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT RlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT G304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT KlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 8304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT M301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT C305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT PlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT l203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT B303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT NlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT B302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT G203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J302 Renton, WA 9805S 2D23059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 12D5 Grant Ave S APT 0103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 120S Grant Ave S APT S105 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT (303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Ql03 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT flOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT M304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT Cl03 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT Ml05 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT PlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT C205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT LlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT DlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 8301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT f301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 8201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT ClOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT JlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT S101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT D202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT A203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT M306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT 8301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C303 Renton, WA 980SS 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT Q202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT A204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT (304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT 0202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT N205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT K301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT Q303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT K204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT M103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT K306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT Q103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT A301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT 5303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT P204 Renton, WA 9805S 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT Q301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M105 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 0201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 8201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT N202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT 1103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT 5204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT M205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT J203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT A203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT C205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT LlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT C201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT 0302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT QlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT G303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT 0304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT 8101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT 1302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT G304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT L303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT GlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT M302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT 8204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT J304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5203 Renton, WA 98055 20230S9111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT RlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT N305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT C301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT B203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT N306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT R304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT P305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT DlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT Q201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT L301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N105 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 8303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J301 Renton, WA 9805S 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K3DS Renton, WA 98055 2023DS9111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT AlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 8103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L204 Renton, WA 98055 2023DS9111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT F202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT PlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave 5 APT Q204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1301 Renton, WA 980S5 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R204 Renton, WA 9805S 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H101 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT LlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT S301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT J204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 0201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT S302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 0301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT 0202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT ClOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R304 Renton, WA 98055 2023D59111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT KlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J302 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT F304 Renton, WA 9805S 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT J301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT S304 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 0203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT Fl03 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT A201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT K202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G303 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave 5 APT KlOS Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT D203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 120S Grant Ave S APT N20S Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT K205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N206 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT S305 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT NlOl Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT B204 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT Ll05 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT P205 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411GrantAveSAPT J103 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT M!Ol Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT 5306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G!Ol Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059112 N/A WA-WOODCLIFFE THOMSON REUTERS PTS (WELLS) 2235 FARADAY AVE SUITE 0 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 2023059155 N/A WA-WOODCLIFFE THOMSON REUTERS PTS (WELLS) 2235 FARADAY AVE SUITE 0 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 2475200680 WESPESTAD ARNE V+WESPESTAD 2045 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98055 2475200700 RESIDENT 2059 SE 8th Dr Renton, WA 980SS 2475200720 RESIDENT 2101 SE 8th Dr Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT l306 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT N203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1201 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT G202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT 1203 Renton, WA 98055 2023059112 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S Renton, WA 98055 2475200660 NGUYEN DUY+NHA HOANG 2025 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98055 2475200690 HEISE JENNIE L 16818105TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 2475200710 MARSH LEE & VIRGINIA 2079 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98055 2475200730 GUZMAN MARIA 2105 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT C202 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT S105 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT Q!Ol Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT H301 Renton, WA 98055 2023059111 RESIDENT 1411 Grant Ave S APT L201 Renton, WA 980S5 2023059152 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 2475200670 KRAABEL LUDMILA 2035 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98055 2475200700 MCMANUS JOHN W 34808 SE BURROWS WAY SNOQUALMIE, WA 98065 2475200720 WESCOTT SUSAN 2101 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98052 2475200740 HENDERSON CARLOS T 2109 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98055 2475200750 COOK LYNN ROBERT 2113 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98055 3294700265 ALLEN SHEILA D 1006 GRANT AVES RENTON, WA 98055 3294700400 FREE WILLIAM 1012 HIGH AVES RENTON, WA 98057 7399000210 KERSHNER TIM 30816 BURNING TREE DR CANYON LAKE, CA 92587 7399000660 RESIDENT 1615 Rolling Hills Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 2475200760 YBARRA ARTHUR R 2117 SE 8TH DR RENTON, WA 98055 3294700275 MONAGHAN WILLIAM P+MI-LINDA 1009 HIGH AVES RENTON, WA 98057 3294700410 CHAVES HUGO & UIOK 9506 29TH STE EDGEWOOD, WA 98371 7399000210 RESIDENT 1507 Rolling Hills Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 2475200760 RESIDENT 2117 SE 8th Dr Renton, WA 98055 3294700275 RESIDENT 1009 High Ave 5 Renton, WA 98057 3294700410 RESIDENT 1015 Jones Ave 5 Renton, WA 98057 7399000660 ROLLING HILLS VILLAGE HOMES PO BOX 656 RENTON, WA 98055 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA16-000922 Jeff McMeekin, Puget Sound Energy Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr. (parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The proposed new control house exceeds the maximum height for accessory structures within the R-8 zone, and therefore requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. The proposal includes some transmission line work outside the substation fence; however, no additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a dete'ntion pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which will trigger SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 63 trees. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: 2400 S Puget Dr. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on Febraury 10, 2017. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: January 27, 2017 January 23, 2017 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SIGNATURES: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Public Works Department Community Services Department -D-at_e_--+t:2-_ ~hall, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services t/2z/t7 Date ~,r.bL .. m,,,,,,lt Department of Community & Economic Development N(.Eo&~ 7;r,:c;,;-if-' -r:,0, //V;co,Rlf-"l47Jc:w' /-. .SF/V-z:J/#, Rr'<;o.Z-Jr N/:/?b4T,r # ,,;JF 71(%7'J ,f'F/t.u:7P c/.? ,, ,4,.:::5 6 ff/7£' /L J:J f-;r,4 / c.. oJC ,,L/ JI.? i?.4 If o.S-4 /'o4li' /;rZ: Loc,4fio/V °'7"'4..4'/V{' ye14". 2023059111 RESIDENT / 1411 Grant Ave S APT C204 Renton WA 98055 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. . DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LANO USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: December 22, 2016 LUAlG-000922, ECF, SA·H, Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr. (parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is · proposing to rebuild a portion_ of th~ Talbot Hill Substation in _order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The proposed new control house exceeds the maximum height for accessory structures Within the R-8 zone, and therefore requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. The proposal includes some transmission line work outside the substation fence; however, no additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which will trigger SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 63 tris. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The proJect s e contains moderate coal mine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes {within 50 feet). The ap.eliJ'.3Yt has subm~n Arborixeport and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application.CO n t +-h J j'v PROJECT LOCAnt:?:!'1 d1'5_4;_~6i1ao:s pi.Yr~ spec, .f-t C 1,.e 5C r I pl-)7:J!) dnd · /;),O r-e· err=tjed "If-ff} O/Ni Clf6 r 'ec:;l/ej'. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (!"N&'f: As't/ie lead Agency, the Ci/v of Renton has ermined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. MAI LI NG ADDRESS: -~'...:..i~:.:C:~.t:,;!.!:'.!....:..!!'...!':'..-"_..=.~=t- TELEPHONE NO.: _..£..="'---<::....:::....:=:.........:,""-"'-''-":_- 2023059111 RESIDENT 1205 Grant Ave S APT R201 Renton WA 98055 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 22, 2016 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA16-000922, ECF, SA-H, PROJECT NAME: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental {SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr. {parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The proposed new control house exceeds the maximum height for accessory structures Within the R·8 zone, and therefore requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. The proposal includes some transmission line work outside the substation fence; however, no additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which will trigger SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 63 trees. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application. f PROJECT LOCATION: 2400 S Puget Drive OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non~Significance {DNS). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14·day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: LUA16-000922, ECF, SA·H, Talbot Hill Substation Improvements ' NAMEkim arui ... a)J.td (\\\ u..:t:rrlct J±fe ~ MAILING ADDRESS:~ \clC6 f,afU: (}JJJ .?. City/State/2ip: kU6 qf!(J£; TELEPHONE NO.: ,4.qv'y,9-] I' cft; / NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: December 22, 2016 LUA16-000922, ECF, SA-H, Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr. (parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The proposed new control house exceeds the maximum height for accessory structures within the R-8 zone, and therefore requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. The proposal includes some transmission line work outside the substation fence; however, no additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which will trigger SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 63 trees. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application. PROJECT LOCATION: 2400 S Puget Drive OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: December 6, 2016 December 22, 2016 Angelea Weihs, Assistant Planner/City of Renton/1055 S Grady Way/ Renton, WA 98057/ 425-430-7312/ aweihs@rentonwa.gov Environmental (SEPA) Review If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: LUA16-000922, ECF, SA-H, Talbot Hill Substation Improvements NAME:----------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: _________________ City/State/Zip:----------- TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Building Permit, Construction Permit Arborist's Report, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for February 14, 2017 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers at 11:00 am on the 7th floor of Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated Residential Medium Density on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential 8 du/ac on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Angelea Weihs, Assistant Planner, CED - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on January 5, 2017. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on February 14, 2017 at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-6578. Following the issuance of the SEPA Determination, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments regarding the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Angelea Weihs, Assistant Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7312; Eml: aweihs@rentonwa.gov I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I Subject: FW: PSE Talbot Hill Pre-App Meeting See below. From: Russell, Christopher Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 7:25 AM To: Kriner, Kerry Subject: RE: PSE Talbot Hill Pre-App Meeting Hi Kerry, Most of the old steel structures that support the electrical equipment in the 230kVyard will be removed and replaced in kind. The old lattice dead end towers will also be replaced with a slimmer tapered tubular steel dead end. The structures to be replaced include the dead end towers, switch stands, bus supports, and the circuit breaker foundations. Chris Russell, PE Senior Civil Engineer Substation Design, Civil Engineering PUGET SOUND ENERGY 425-456-2127 tel 425-766-3529 cell 355 110th Ave NE EST-04W Bellevue, WA. 98004 www .PSE.com<http://www.PSE.com> From: Kriner, Kerry Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 6:20 PM To: Reed, Molly; Russell, Christopher Subject: FW: PSE Talbot Hill Pre-App Meeting Can you address this? Thanks! Kerry From: Angelea Weihs [AWeihs@Rentonwa.gov<mailto:AWeihs@Rentonwa.gov>] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 5:10 PM To: Kriner, Kerry Subject: RE: PSE Talbot Hill Pre-App Meeting Hello Kerry, I have some additional questions to clarify in preparation for the hearing. The project narrative states that steel structures are proposed for removal and replacement. Could you clarify what the steel structures include? Will the new structures increase in size from existing steel structures? Is it just a like for like replacement? Thank you! Angelea Weihs :) 425.430.7312 2 Angelea Weihs From: Sent: To: Kriner, Kerry <Kerry.Kriner@pse.com> Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:22 AM Angelea Weihs Subject: Fwd: PSE Talbot Hill Pre-App Meeting Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Russell, Christopher" <christopher.russell@pse.com<mailto:christopher.russell@pse.com» Date: February 14, 2017 at 9:18:55 AM PST To: "Kriner, Kerry" <Kerry.Kriner@pse.com<mailto:Kerry.Kriner@pse.com» Subject: RE: PSE Talbot Hill Pre-App Meeting The proposed DE towers are 67' tall, and they are the tallest structures proposed. The existing DE towers are 75' tall, so the proposed replacement will be shorter and have a smaller profile. Chris Russell, PE Senior Civil Engineer Substation Design, Civil Engineering PUGET SOUND ENERGY 425-456-2127 tel 425-766-3529 cell 355 110th Ave NE EST-04W Bellevue, WA. 98004 www .PSE.com<http://www.PSE.com> From: Kriner, Kerry Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:11 AM To: Russell, Christopher Subject: Fwd: PSE Talbot Hill Pre-App Meeting Another question. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Angelea Weihs <AWeihs@Rentonwa.gov<mailto:AWeihs@Rentonwa.gov» Date: February 14, 2017 at 8:34:04 AM PST To: "'Kriner, Kerry'" <Kerry.Kriner@pse.com<mailto:Kerry.Kriner@pse.com» Subject: RE: PSE Talbot Hill Pre-App Meeting I forgot to mention in my last email. The towers are 35 feet in height correct? These are the tallest structures proposed for replacement? From: Kriner, Kerry [mailto:Kerry.Kriner@pse.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 7:48 AM To: Angelea Weihs <AWeihs@Rentonwa.gov<mailto:AWeihs@Rentonwa.gov» 1 ------Renton@ Plan Review Routing Slip Plan Number: Site Address: LUAlG-000922 2400 S PUGET DR Name: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements Description: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr (parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The proposed new control house exceeds the maximum height for accessory structures within the R-8 zone, and therefore requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system . The proposal includes some transmission line work outside the substation fence; however, no additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which will trigger SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 63 trees. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation . The project site contains moderate coal mine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within SO feet). The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application. Review Type: Date Assigned: Date Due: Police Review-Version 1 12/22/2016 01/05/2017 Project Manager: Angelea Weihs Environmental Impact Earth Animals Air Environmental Health Water Energy/Natural Resources Pia nts Housing Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: Light/GI a re Historic/Cultura I Preservation Recreation Airport Envi ronmenta I Utilities 10,000 Feet Transportation 14,000 Feet Public Service Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and /or requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant need~ to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added Y/l / r+ I) . -~c 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date January 27, 2017 Jeff McMeekin Puget Sound Energy PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N Bellevue, WA 98009 Denis Law Mayor Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Talbot Hill Substation Improvements, LUAlG-000922, ECF, SA-A, CU-H Dear Mr. McMeekin: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review ofthe subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report, for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on Febraury 10, 2017, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Also, a public hearing has been scheduled by the Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall on February 14, 2017 at 11:00 am to consider the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff recommendation will be mailed to you prior to the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. If you have any further questions, please call me at (425) 430-7312. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov Talbot Hill Substation Improvements, LUA16-000922 Page 2 of 2 January 27, 2017 For the Environmental Review Committee, ~ ct,,,J, 11, a~- Angelea Weihs Assistant Planner Enclosure cc: Puget Sound Energy, Inc./ Owner(s) Bob Gambill, Johnjoseph Pajor, Kimberly Board /Party(ies) of Record 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov • -------,,,,,..Ren tOll e OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED {DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000922, ECF, SA-H LOCATION: 2400 S Puget Drive DESCRIPTION: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental {SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr. {parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house is proposed in its place. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. No additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system is proposed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which triggers SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within SO feet). The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMIITEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION HAS PROBABLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS THAT CAN BE MITIGATED THROUGH MITIGATION MEASURES. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on Febraury 10, 2017, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON February 14, 2017 AT 11:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. Denis Law Mayor Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator January 27, 2017 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on January 23, 2017: SEPA DETERMINATION: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: Determination of Non-Significance (DNS-M) Talbot Hill Substation Improvements LUAlG-000922, ECF, SA-A, CU-H Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:00 p.m. on February 10, 2017, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7312. For the Environmental Review Committee, cJ2,w1vi 11, a,-,,.--.v Angelea Weihs Assistant Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 , rentonwa.gov Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -------Renton® ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA16-000922 Jeff McMeekin, Puget Sound Energy Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr. (parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The proposed new control house exceeds the maximum height for accessory structures within the R-8 zone, and therefore requires approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. The proposal includes some transmission line work outside the substation fence; however, no additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which will trigger SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 63 trees. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application. PROJECT LOCATION: 2400 S Puget Dr. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on Febraury 10, 2017. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 27, 2017 JANUARY 23, 2017 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SIGNATURES: --___,_~ ------ Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Date Rick M. Marshall, Administrator Public Works Department Fire & Emergency Services 1/23b2 Date ~.9u_ ->t ~incent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development 1/z:1lz Date \ 1-,, 1,-z ~ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -------Renton® DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: LUAlG-000922, ECF, SA-A, CU-H APPLICANT: Jeff McMeekin PROJECT NAME: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PSE is requesting Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review, and Site Plan Review for proposed Talbot Hill Substation improvements located at 2400 S Puget Dr. (parcel numbers 2023059003 and 2023059066). The project site totals 50.4 acres and is zoned Residential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation in order to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house is proposed in its place. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence is proposed to be removed, including steel structures and foundations. No additional transmission lines are proposed with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system is proposed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The detention pond will involve an excavation of more than 500 cubic yards, which triggers SEPA Review. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. Additional driveway improvements are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report and Geotechnical Engineering Study with the application. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 2400 S Puget Drive The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. The applicant shall submit a revised Geotechnical report, updated to the 2015 IBC design parameters, with construction and building permit application, and the project shall follow the recommendations of the revised Geotechnical report. ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process far the land use actions. PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Building Review -Planning Comments Contact: Craig Bumell I 425-430-7290 I cbumell@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Project will be reviewed for compliance with Building Codes. The current adopted building code is 2015 International Building Code. Recommendations of the geotechnical report must be followed as a condition of building permits. Geotechnical report should be updated to 2015 IBC design parameters. Engineering Review Comments Contact: Ann Fowler I 425-430-7382 I afowler@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the Talbot Hill Substation at 2400 S Puget Drive (APN('s) 202305 9003, 9066, 9064) and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS The total site is approximately 50.4 acres acres in size and is irregular in shape. The site includes an existing substation with access gravel driveways. The substation covers approximately 7.75 acres of the total site area. Water No water service is proposed or required for the redevelopment project. Sewer No sewer service is proposed or required for the redevelopment project. Stonn Runoff from the site sheet flows outward from the middle of the substation. There are existing drainage pipes on the northeast and southeast side of the substation which are tied to catch basins within the fence line. The rims of the catch basins are currently at an elevation higher than the surrounding ground, which prevents them from capturing stonnwater. Grade differences between the substation slab and the surrounding ground surface along the north and northeast sides of the substation prevents stormwater from draining away from the substation and tends to pond within the substation footprint. Runoff along the southern edge of the substation flows into a culvert located beneath the access road which ultimately flows east towards Grant Avenue South. Streets The site is bordered by Beacon Way South to the northeast. Beacon Way South is classified as a Residential Access Road and is located within the City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline Easement. The site is bordered by Puget Drive Southeast to the south. Puget Drive Southeast is classified as a Minor Arterial Street. Existing right of way in Puget Drive Southeast is approximately 100 feet as measured using the King County Assessor's Map. There are no existing frontage improvements along Puget Drive Southeast. CODE REQUIREMENTS SURFACE WATER 1. A geotechnical report, dated December 5, 2016, completed by GeoEngineers, Inc. for the site has been provided. The project site contains moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). Erosion control measures will need to be in place prior to starting grading activities on the site. The report discusses the soil and groundwater characteristics of the site including infiltration potential and provides recommendations for project design and construction. The report discounts the use of infiltration for the site due to the depth of the outwash soils compared to the existing surface elevations present on the site. Geotechnical recommendations presented need to be address within the project plans. 2. A Preliminary Drainage Plan and Technical lnfonnation Report (TIA), dated November 16, 2016, was submitted by HDR Engineering, Inc. with the Land Use Application. Based on the City of Renton's flow control map, the site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard area matching Forested Site Conditions and is within the Lower Cedar River and Black River Drainage Basin. The development is subject to Full Drainage Review in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the 2010 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. All core requirements and the six special requirements are discussed in the Technical Information Report. The following stormwater improvements are required and shall be discussed within the TIA: a. The applicant submitted a complete Condition Use Pennit Application on December 6, 2016 and is therefore vested to the 2009 KCSWDM and the 201 o City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM for a period of 180 days from the application date. The vesting period will expire on June 4, 2017 in accordance with AMC 4 1 045E.2.b. A complete Construction Permit Application must be received prior to the expiration date of the vesting period. Otherwise, the applicant will be required to comply with the stormwater manual that is in effect at the time of construction pennit application. b. Appropriate flow control BMPs will be required to help mitigate the new runoff created by this development since the new plus replaced impervious area is over 2,000 square feet. A preliminary drainage plan, including the application of flow control BMPs, shall be included with the land use application, as applicable to the project. c. As noted in the report, the applicant is exempt from water quality since the new plus replaced pollution generating impervious surface (PGIS) area is less than 5,000 square feet. Any changes to the redevelopment project which results in greater than 5,000 square feet of PGIS area, as defined by the 2009 KCSWDM, may trigger water quality facilities to be provided. 3. The applicant has proposed installation of a new stonnwater conveyance system inside the substation which will route flows to a new --------Renton 0 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Engineering Review Comments Contact: Ann Fowler I 425-430-7382 I afowler@rentonwa.gov detention pond to be located at the sound end of the substation between the substation and the access road in order to mitigate the added impervious surface area of the redevelopment project. 4. All work proposed outside of the applicant's property will require a permanent drainage easement to be provided to the City and a temporary construction easement prior to any permits being issued. 5. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology is required since grading and clearing of the site exceeds one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site. 6. Surface water system development fee is $0.641 per square foot of new impervious surface, but not less than $1,608.00. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. TRANSPORTATION 1. Per City code 4 6 060, required half street frontage improvements shall include 54 ft of paved roadway width (27 ft from centerline), installation of a 0.5 foot curb, an 8 foot planting strip, an 8 foot sidewalk, street trees and storm drainage improvements. No right of way dedication is required. 2. Refer to City code 4 4 080 regarding driveway regulations. Driveways shall be designed in accordance with City standard plans 104.1 and 104.2. a. The maximum width of any driveway shall not exceed 30 feet at the right of way line. b. Driveways shall be located a minimum of 5 feet from property lines. c. Maximum driveway slope is 8%. 3. Paving and trench restoration shall comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements for any work within the City right of way. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. When utility plans are complete, please submit four (4) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, one (1) complete electronic submittal (drawings and drainage report), the pem,it application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. Please visit the Development Engineering Forms page for the most up to date plan submittal requirements: http://rentonwa.gov/business/default.aspx?id=42473 2. Adequate separation between utilities as well as other features shall be provided in accordance with code requirements. 3. All construction utility permits for utility and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall confirm to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans. 4. A final survey that is stamped and signed by the professional land surveyor of record will need to be provided. All existing utilities need to be surveyed and shoYv'Jl. Please reference COR Maps for mapping and records of existing utilities in the project vicinity. 5. A landscaping plan shall be included with the civil plan submittal. Each plan shall be on separate sheets. 6. All utility lines (i.e. electrical, phone, and cable services, etc.) serving the proposed development must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton inspector. 7. Fees quoted in this document reflect the fees applicable in the year 2017 only and will be assessed based on the fee that is current at the time of the pem,it application or issuance, as applicable to the permit type. Please visit www.rentonwa.gov for the current development fee schedule. '0B,RENION '1 "'' C<>f)!W~1qiij11~El.Q!',MENT -Pl.AN N!~G ·01vis16N OF:SER\/ICE:av'MAIIING . On the 27 day of January, 20171 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing SEPA Determination and Notice documents. This information was sent to: Agencies Puget Sound Energy Jeff McMeekin, Puget Sound Energy Parties of Record (\~ (Signature of Sender): ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) Notary (Print): My appointment expires: See Attached Owner Applicant See attached . ' \ .~~,t ,-,o lol1 ,?( L' I Talbot Hill Substation Improvements LUA16-000922, ECF, SA-A, CU-H template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers*** Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Jailaine Madura Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETIER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher' 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office* 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division* Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 5. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Tim McHarg Director of Community Development 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Newcastle, WA 98056 Puget Sound Energy Kathy Johnson, 355 110th Ave NE Mailstop EST llW Bellevue, WA 98004 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.• Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015-172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Jack Pace Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City ofTukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template· affidavit of service by mailing Puget Sound Energy, Inc. PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N Bellevue. WA 980099734 Johnioseoh Paior 1411 Grant Ave, C204 Renton. WA 98055 Bob Gambill Seattle Public Utilities -SPU_WTR PO BOX 34018 Seattle. WA 981244018 Kimberly Board WOODCLIFFE APARTMENTS 120S Grant Ave S Renton, WA 98055-6057 Jeff McMeekin Puget Sound Energy PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N Bellevue. WA 980099734 January 26, 2017 Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent Seattle Public Utilities P.O. Box 34018 Seattle WA 98124-4018 Denis Law Mayor Community & Economic Development C. E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator SUBJECT: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements comment response letter LUA16·000922, ECF, SA-H, Dear Bob Gambill: Thank you for your comments related to the Talbot Hill Substation Improvements as part of the public comment period. Your email, dated December 28, 2016, specified concerns about the Seattle Public Utilities' Cedar River Water Transmission Pipelines Right of Way, which is adjacent to the Talbot Hill Substation Project Area. You specifically mentioned a concern about PSE/substation- related traffic using the Seattle Public Utilities Right of Way for vehicle access. The Talbot Hill substation property is accessed via an existing access driveway extending from S Puget Drive (See the attached site plan and proposed access improvements). As part of the project, the applicant is proposing improvements to the existing access driveway that includes repaving with asphalt, widening of the approach apron, and a security gate. The access driveway will remain in its current location. Thank you for providing comments. If you would like to review the project file, the submitted documents are available on the 61h Floor of City Hall. You have been added as a Party of Record to receive notifications as the project moves through the application process. Sincerely, -·1 / // ~_/(/1:?~ Angelea Weihs Associate Planner cc: File 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 • rentonwa.gov \ \ I \ I"' ~~~ i ! ! ! i I ~ ' I ' I I I I I I I I I -,-----____ J:; --// / r----------4-/ i /11 /'T" __ _ : // ;>,: ! /1 /j"' ' ' 1 I· 1 / 1 r:I I I I Im 1 I I I I -, I I .,, .. i I I I ! I I I t I i r-----., 1 I I I I 1 I I : I !:'_I I I iilil ,-' I I :i " I ----..__j I;\; I I I :j' I I I : I I !i i \ I I ;; I i 1 I I \!i I i I I ls~::: : .a" I I I ,i: 1· I ·" I . I I i I I I : I I \ I I ---.---------LL.L I i ___________ l._ __ i Im t·:' ~ 1 ;I; X ~ l •11, ,: :1,.:1 l "-.! ...; 1:ll10\ ' ' ' -=-Z-= .,. ' ~ 0 z a ,_ u w V, ~o ~-;- >- ~ w u z < :: z w ll.-00 I --- l!l!!l!III ~ - N 0 ,,...,_ ,.. ~f/ (/I~ - LEGEND P<larosto co•rnx.,, nrs•1.r. COHH>.JRS GR><.C •tCESS S<l'O FtNCE eOl!Ml•"' ·*· I I s,o. O,tO,E•~eoo,:au"'s 01rc, ,.:/ \ 'Baus«,' ): ,z:' ·r· .. , ' ' ,,. , ... ·., !,1 ,.: /. _:·' .r:,,;- . ~. -•oc-- ~CC'~iiv 450-------4. ... ~·~' ----·~·-.. ,,1--. ----?i-\(1:}\;K/(_;{;_·.,J_~~:~~~-f/"-i~Y c~,: · -~}-~ GOA\'[C ,v,,ii,s. S~-1 ~ ;;,f]---- -~..:_,--0.,1YPl ' ' a·--o• •IN!~~ TYPICAL DITCH SECTION - ~:t6/'"" ~~:~~~~t\-t ,•. ~ sro·:;~;-~~; esE 1 . / oil o'[{ s',,OIJ•$>: .vf ''\ I "" ""' §-~··~"~·~-~~,.;,..sjL~ "'"'E -q-,.·mziJl,~ ,);&od~<'ffl'l'l'~' o ','..; _ ~ F~,':' .. 90 LN,•1vt c-•cn:o '--~"""' '"'"''' "''"" ""c-•cTEO p£A '" STO ,,,,.,i,c suea.s, ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACED DRIVEWAY SECT ION {if) '1,,; ~n GflAP~.!~,,SCALE " 113203.08 ~. ~a /' ~ N ~ .... "· .... ' ' ' ... ... " ·/·/·~ ·,, ./ .... . ·, .... ·. ' .... ·/··· ..• ·/ · .. ·, '/ ,...._ y ..... )<' ... )< /' . ,. .. ;~ /' ·. ·. ,/>-) ,i• ,.,.a~ .· --' ~/ //~ -, ·/ __ $;?.,· ~ 't:) . ,§1. (j;,;/J ·:t:;> J __.·--St ,.<J•'"-. / ~'''""'-----;~,"~ ,/ '''""'"" ~:,; 'i) / ,,.-·r-§''i,. I@. CALL BEFORE /.:::: YOO DIG Coll: TOLLFRH 1-aoo -424-5555_ '""'(N "'"""'"' I"',.-"'"'"' ,,1on31s 0 ES•Jt SU0~J11'1. ~ "" E""-\'!frn if_R.,-_11 I/""'" ""''"'° ·~OVE[,_ I ) ~F'-lK -,,,.,,,,. ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 230KV SWITCHYARD TALBOT HILL SUBSTATION += ""'-'' , •• 10'-Q" suaSTATION SNOLN££•1NG OFY•RT"'NT "''""'"' o-1a11_s~1 a I"'-"-'" ' .. Angelea Weihs From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Angelea, Gambill, Bob < Bob.Gambill@seattle.gov> Wednesday, December 28, 2016 2:45 PM Angelea Weihs Gambill, Bob LUA 16-000922 ECF SA-H PSE Talbot Hill Substation DNS for LUA 16-000922, ECF, SA-H.pdf; Seattle Public Utilities Right of Way Ortho Map.jpg Follow up Flagged Please make me a "party of Record" to received further information on this project. Please see the attached Map labeled "Seattle Public Utilities Right of Way Ortho Map." Seattle Public Utilities' Cedar River Water Transmission Pipelines Right of Way is adjacent to the PSE Project Area. The Right of Way looks like a road, but it cannot be used like a road. The right of way contains 3 very large underground water transmission pipelines: 66", 52" and a 42" in diameter. 2/3 of the water supply for approximately 800,000 people living in western King County is delivered through these pipelines. Vibrations and heavy loads could damage these pipelines. Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent Seattle Public Utilities P .0. Box 34018 Seattle WA 98124-4018 206-684-5969 bob.gambill@seattle.gov 1 Seattle Public Utilities' (SPU) Cedar River •Water Transmission Pipelines Right of Way. 1 -66" Pipe 1 -51" Pipe 1 -42" Pipe ,, • • • ' • ,. 213 of the water supply for approximately : •-;, I 800,000 people in w estern King County • ... -.--.,----.. ~....,......._-,.............. .. ftiwfflr = .. -... , ................. , ,-------~-~~--~~..._....----~-- Right of Way cannot be used for construction traffic or staging of any kind without prior permission of SPU. Bob Gambill, Senior Real Property Agent bob.gambill@seattle.gov 206-684-5969 f DEPARTMENT OF COM ML ... rv AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ---------Ren toll 8 Planning Division LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: PuQet Sound Enerav, Inc. Talbot Hill Substation Improvements PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS: PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N 2400 S Puget Drive CITY: ZIP: Bellevue 98009-9734 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-462-3824 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 2023059066, 2023059003 and 2023059064 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): Utility .. . COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Utility EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: Residential Medium Density PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ZIP: (if applicable) N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING ZONING: Residential 8 CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NAME: SITE AREA (in square feet): 2,195,424 Jeff McMeekin SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED: 0 Puqet Sound Enerav SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 0 PSE owns all three parcels, there is no easement (by law, a property owner cannot grant an easement to PO Box 97034 M/S PSE-09N himselfl. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (if applicable) NIA Bellevue 98009-9734 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) N/A . :·',"'; . UEC O 6 2016 1 Z:\MLP Municipal Land Planners\6A Projects\Talbot Hill Substation\Talbot Site Plan Submittal\masterapp.doc "J . , Rev: 08/2015 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN IT, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1425-462-3824 jeff.mcmeekin@pse.com ----------Renton E) NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A 2 Z:\MLP Municipal Land Planners\GA Projects\Talbot Hill Substation\Talbot Site Plan Submittal\masterapp.doc Rev: 08/2015 I PROJECT INFORMAT~IO_N _ _,_ (,c_o_n_ti_n_ue_d_,_) _______ ~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE; NiA $6,700,000 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE 0 AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA r8I GEOLOGIC HAZARD D HABITAT CONSERVATION D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAK!cS D WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY __ sq.ft. __ sq.ft. __ sq.ft. __ sq.ft. __ sq.ft. (Attach leaal descriDtion on seDarate sheet with the followina information included! ... . . -·--.. . SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 5E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP -.ti,.~~ I, (Print Name/s) i~. ~eclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) D the current owner of the property involved in this application or Ciil the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects tnue and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. f Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Je fl:: kW'/ri signed this instrument and acknowledge ii to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instnument. Dated "''"'""''' " ,,,, ,,, ~ 'l ~ ~Washington Notary (Plin My appointment expires: G/,Uq//~ z Z:\MLP Municipal Land Planners\6A Projects\Talbot Hill Substation\Talbot Site Plan Submittal\masterapp.doc Rev: 08/2015 ,I 'I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton® WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Reriton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED BY: MODIFIED BY: _-Arborist Report;, Biological Assessment 4 Calc41ati;,nSi\ .. ·. Colored Maps for Display 4 Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication 1 .-tiensity worksheeh< · Drainage Control Plan 2 P'.t.linagef Report 2 • _.-•. --·· --. Elevations, Architectural iANo 4 Envir8iimental Checklist{ .... Flood Hazard Data 4 Floor·P!ans;AND4 Geotechnical Report2AN0, •Grading Elevations. & Pian,_ Conceptual 2 Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed 2 Habitat Data Report• . ·-·.ff;:,··· ·.· . -. . .. Improvement Deferral , Irrigation Plan,· COMMENTS: PROJECT NAME: PSE Tq/bo t bi fl s· .... t;1sfg±!'oa DATE: ,P12,,:;,~mb.er I, 2D/(p , 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmlttalreqs.docx Rev: D8/2Dl5 LAN.DUSE PERMIT SUBM.ITTAL REQUIREMENTS: . . . Landscap~·Plali, Conceptual~ ;§a#~Ici/iif.l~n{9~\~iJ¢til:i,,f/};c ~egal Description 4 -; ·, ., '. ,(et,Wn~t:w'6~frif{~dil)g\D{C3~ci]Wii~~l*i~k:,~:;/;'.f Map of Existing Site Conclitions 4 • i.M~#~r'.iP~\iaiiti~fi,f ~rm'/t/;i:,g~~;:, hr MonumentC:a1cls (one per monument) 1 ·· .. :Nii1~6B(lfffogfQiita.il.M~#'i.·lf·.:,';?·\,!N:,?J•:'.:?'.;:·I· Overall Plat Plan• Rehabilitation .Plah 4 · s~rei~1~iliR¥1~i11{,ttc:f'''i)!.}/•'•· Title Report or Plat Certificate 1AND4 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 · Wetiai\ds Mitig;tiorrPlan;. Ptelimliiary / . WAIVED BY: 2 MODIFIED . BY; H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Plannlng\Walversubmittalreqs.docx " ,. COMMENTS.: Rev: 08/2015 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: . Wetfands:R~port/peiineation.v , C· C: .. Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2AND3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2ANoa ' Lease Agreement, Draft >AND, Map of Existing Site Conditions ,AND• Map of View Area 2AND3 Photosimulations 2AND3 This Requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning :. - WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: ·····PfiJ•···· ,". -· .. ' ' ..... -_ ~ :-·:_: . -: -__ . ' 3 H:\CED\Data\forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx ' COMMENTS: ' ·.,, ·· ..•••.. '' ·, .::·•c:• ·:.·.: ::-. ,':) '' ,' .. ;".,-• :., ._.'.-" ,' • .:-.. :.": •._:·.a . ' ' ' ' Rev:08/2015 ' , PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR PSE Talbot Hill Substation PRE 16-000437 CITY OF RENTON Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division July 7, 2016 Contact Information: Planner: Angelea Weihs, 425.430.7312, aweihs@rentonwa.gov Public Works Plan Reviewer: Ann Fowler, 425.430.7382, afowler@rentonwa.gov Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430.7024, cthomas@rentonwa.gov Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have It pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). ' FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT -----Renton® DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: No comments. MEMORANDUM July 7, 2016 Angelea Weihs, Assistant Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector PSE Talbot Hill Substation Puget Drive SE PRE16-000437 .. ' , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------Renton® MEMORANDUM DATE: July 7, 2016 TO: Angelea Weihs, Planner FROM: Ann Fowler, Clvll Engineer 11, Plan Review PSE Talbot Hill Substation SUBJECT: Puget Drive SE PRE16-000437 NOTE: The applicant Is cautioned that information contained In this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official Oty decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal located at parcel(s) 2023059066. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the Oty of Renton by the applicant. WATER 1. No water services proposed. SEWER 1. No sewer services proposed. SURFACE WATER 1. There is no conveyance system abutting the subject property. 2. A drainage report complying with the City adopted 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City Amendments will be required. Based on the City's flow control map, the site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard area matching Forested Site Conditions and Is within the Lower Cedar River and Black River Drainage Basins. Refer to Figure 1.1.2.A -Flow chart to determine the type of drainage review required Tn the City of Renton 2009 Surface Water Design Manual Amendment. 3. A Construction Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology is required ff clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. 4. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability, with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be submitted with the application. • • Pse Talbot HIii Substation-PRE16-000437 July 7, 2016 Page 2 of2 • • 5. Surface water system development fee Is $0.594 per square foot of new impervious surface. This Is payable prior to Issuance of the construction permit. 6. Effective January 2, 2017, the City of Renton will be adopting a new stormwater manual which will be based on the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual. All project vested after January 2, 2017 will be subject to these new stormwater requirements. Please refer to RMC 4- 1-045 for information regarding project vesting. TRANSPORTATION 1. The proposed development fronts Beacon Way South along the east property line(s). Beacon Way South Is classlfled as a Residential Access Road and Is located within the City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline Easement. As the road Is not public right-of-way, no dedication or frontage Improvements will be required as part of the re-development. 2. Refer to City code 4-4-080 regarding driveway regulations. a. A minimum separation of 5 feet is required between driveway and the property line. b. Maximum driveway slopes shall not exceed 15%. Driveways exceeding 8% shall provide slotted drains. c. The maximum driveway width shall not exceed forty feet (40'). GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All construction or service utll!ty permits for drainage and street Improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utillty plans are complete, please submit four (4) copies ofthe drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, one (1) complete electronic submittal {drawings and droinqqe report), the permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. 3. Fees quoted In this document reflect the fees applicable· in the year 2016 only and will be assessed based on the fee that ls current at the time of the permit application. I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ------Renton® DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM July 7, 2016 Pre-Application File No. 16-000437 Angelea Weihs, Assistant Planner PSE Talbot HIii Substation 2400 S Puget Drive General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting Issues ;,re based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes In effect on the date of review. The applicant Is cautioned that information contained In this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant Is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $SO.OD plus tax from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or onllne at www.rentonwa.gov. Project Proposal: The subject property (Tax Parcel nos. 2023059066 and 2023059003) Is located at 2400 S Puget Dr. The project site totals 50.4 acres and Is zoned Resldential-8 (R-8). PSE is proposing to rebuild a portion of their Talbot Hill Substation located at this locatlon, to replace aging equipment. PSE Is proposing to remove the existing 230kV substation equipment Inside the fence, Including steel structures and foundations, and replace with new equipment. The proposed work would include some transmission line work outside the substation fence; however, no additional transmission lines will be added with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm Improvements would require the removal of about 12 mature trees. Additional driveway improvements/widening are proposed to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. The project site contains moderate coalmlne hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes (within 50 feet). Zoning Info: The subject property Is zoned Residential -8 (R-8). "Utilities, large" are permitted within the R-8 Zone with approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit on the condition that "aboveground public utility facilities, such as water towers, reservoirs, water H:\CED\Plannlns\Current Plannlng\PREAPPS\2016 Preapps\PRE16-000437.Angelea\PRE16-000437 PSE Substation Planning Comments.docx PSE Talbot HIii Substation Page 2of3 July 7, 2016 • • • • treatment facilities, and pump stations shall be treated with public art, subject to approval by the Arts Commission." Staff could find no conditional use permit associated with this property; therefore, the use would be considered a legal, nonconforming use. A condition use permit would need to be obtained In order to enlarge or expand the use so as to occupy additional land area (or increase capacity) on the same or any other lot or parcel. Fencing: All flow control and water quality treatment ponds and similar facilities, as determined by City Development Services, shall be fenced with a six-foot (6') tall chain link fence and access gate. Fencing is required Immediately outside each new stormwater flow control and/or water quality treatment pond and other similar facilities, as determined by City Development Services. For stormwater ponds, the fence shall be placed at the top of the berm with the maintenance access road on the inside of the fence; or five feet (S') minimum from top of berm If there Is no maintenance access road to allow access for proper maintenance of the facility. The chain link fence shall be coated with black or green bonded vinyl and Installed as determined by the City between the facility and the required landscaping. Unless otherwise determined by the City, the fence gate must be posted with a twelve inch {12"1 by eighteen inch (18") "No Trespassing" sign. Cedar or other fencing materials may be Installed only If the stormwater facility is a privately maintained facility that is owned and operated by the owner(s) of the tract. Landscaping: Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by structures, ~equired parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. The perimeter of all new flow control and/or water quality treatment stormwater facilities shall be landscaped in accordance with the provisions of RMC 4-4-070 and the Surface Water Design Manual. A landscaping strip with a minimum fifteen feet {15') of width shall be located on the outside of the fence, unless otherwise determined through the site plan review or subdivision review process. Plantings shall be consistent with the Surface Water Design Manual and RMC 4-4-070. Additionally, trees must be spaced as determined by the Department of Community and Economic Development. Trees and shrubs are prohibited on any berm serving a drainage-related function, within the fenced area of the drainage facility, and within ten feet {10') of any manmade drainage structure (e.g., catch basins, ditches, pipes, vaults, etc.); however, groundcover is required and subject to City review/approval. In the event of a conflict between this Section and the Surface Water Design Manual, the landscaping provisions shall prevail. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4· 070) for further general and specific landscape requirements. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted with permit application. Significant Tree Retention: Utility Uses shall be exempt from the protected tree retention requirements of RMC 4-4·130 if the applicant can Justify the exemption in writing to the Administrator's satisfaction. Critical Areas: Moderate coalmine hazards, moderate landslide hazards, and sensitive slopes are mapped within SO feet of the project site. Whenever a proposed development requires a development permit and a geologic hazard, Including sensitive slopes, Is present on the site of the proposed development or on abutting or adjacent sites within fifty feet {SO') of the subject site, geotechnlcal studies by licensed professionals, such as a geotechnical engineer and/or engineering geologist, shall be required. The geotechnlcal report would need to demonstrate that the proposal would not Increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent or abutting properties beyond pre-development conditions; the proposal will not adversely impact other H :\CEO\Planning\Current Plannlng\PREAPPS\2016 Preapps\PRE16-000437.Angelea\PRE16-000437 PSE Substation Planning Camments.docx a PSE Talbot HIii Substation I Page3 of3 July 7, 2016 critical areas; and the development can be safely accommodated on the site. It is the applicant's responsibility to asi;ertaln whether critical areas or environmental concerns are present on the site during site development or bulldlng construction. Environmental Review: WAC197-11-ll00(3} Repair, remodellng and maintenance activities. The repair, remodellng, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing private or public structures, facilities or equipment, including utilities, recreation, and transportation facilities Involving no material expansions or changes in use beyond that previously existing; except that, where undertaken wholly or In part on lands covered by water are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review. The new stormwater pond and/or any new substation equipment may trigger SEPA Environmental Review If excavation of more than 500 cubic yards ls proposed. If SEPA Is required then an environmental checklist Is a submittal requirement. An environmental determination will be made by the Renton Environmental Review Committee. This determination Is subject to appeal by either the project proponent, by a citizen of the community, or another entity having standing for an appeal. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require a Utility Construction Permit and/or a Building Permit. The project may be subject to Environmental 'SEPA' Review. If required, the Environmental Review application can be reviewed in an estimated time frame of 6-8 weeks once a complete application Is accepted. The application fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) is $1,000. There Is an additional 3% technology fee at the time of land use application. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal Is provided in the attached handouts. In addition to the required permits, separate construction and building permits would be required. Expiration: A utility permit Is valid for two years following utility permit issuance. H:\CED\Plannlng\Current Planning\PREAPPS\2016 Preapps\PRE16-000437.Angelea\PRE16-000437 PSE Substation Planning Comments.docx Talbot Project Narrative • Project Name: Talbot Hill Substation Improvements • Proposed Scope of Work: The proposal is to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation, to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. The existing control house will be demolished and a new control house will be constructed in its place. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence will be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. Some transmission line work outside the substation fence may be required however no additional transmission lines will be added with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 120 trees. Additional driveway improvements are required to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. • Size: The project site totals 50.4 acres. In order to accomplish this total disturbed area will equal approximately 227,370 square feet. The cut will be about 11,500 cubic yards and fill of about 9,000 cubic yards. After construction the area of impervious surface will equal about 78,131 square feet and the pervious surface: 149,238 square feet. • Location: The site is located at 2400 S Puget Drive on parcels 2023059003, 2023059066 and 2023059064. • Land Use Permits Required: Site Plan Review with SEPA. Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit • Zoning designation for site: Residential -8 • Zoning for surrounding properties: Residential-8, Resource Conservation • Current Use: Utility • Special site features: Sensitive slopes, landslide hazards and coal mine hazards mapped • Soil type and drainage conditions: See attached drainage report • Proposed Use: Utility, unchanged • Total estimated construction cost: Unknown at this time • Fair market value of proposal: $6.7M • Trees to be removed: There are 97 significant trees on-site -80 at the stormwater pond site and 17 in the area of selective removal. We are proposing to remove 63 significant trees and retain 34. See attached arborist report for detailed information. • Job shack or trailer location: Unknown at this time; to be determined by contractor. • Proposed modification and stream or wetlands: There are no known wetlands or streams in the project vicinity. The substation improvements, with the exception of the stormwater pond, will remain within the existing fenced area. • Existing Access: There are no proposed off-site improvements, no land dedicated to the city. o Regarding Note 16 in Title Report: PSE's legal and physical access to all three parcels noted above is off the north side of Puget Drive SE at 2023059064. DEC O 6 20\6 Conditional Use Permit Justnication (Control House'): • Consistency with Plans and Regulations: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton. Response: The proposed use is not changing. The proposal includes replacing an existing control house within the Talbot Hill substation with a new control house. The use is compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton. The Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan states: The Utilities Element guides future utility service within Renton's planning area and ensures that adequate utility services will be available to support existing and future development in the City. The goals and policies included in the Utilities Element are designed to promote efficient, cost effective utility service while meeting community needs and protecting both existing neighborhoods and the nature environment. The proposal complies with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: Policy U-7: Non-City utility systems should be constructed in a manner that minimizes negative impacts to existing development and should not interfere with operation of City utilities. City development regulations should otherwise not impair the ability of utility providers to adequately serve customers. Goal U-0: Promote the availability of safe, adequate, and efficient electrical service within the City and its planning area, consistent with the regulatory obligation of the utility to serve customers. Policy U-72: Coordinate with local and regional utility providers to ensure the siting and location of transmission and distribution facilities is accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts to the environment and adjacent land uses. Policy U-73: Encourage electricity purveyors to make facility improvements and additions within existing utility corridors whenever possible. The proposed control house structure will replace an existing control house within the Talbot Hill substation fence. The proposal will have little to no impact on adjacent residential, as the existing use of the site will not change. The control house will replace an existing structure and be located adjacent to the existing structure. There are existing transmission corridors between the substation and neighboring residential properties. The City of Renton has determined that a control house is an accessory building to the substation use. The maximum wall plate in the R-8 zone for an accessory building is 12 feet. The proposed control house wall plate is 11 feet. However, since the overall height exceeds more than 6 feet above the wall plate (RMC 4-2-UOD.18 Vertical Projections from Wall Plates), the City determined that Conditional Use Permit approval is required for the new control house structure. The proposed control house will comply with all other applicable dimensional standards of the R-8 zone. As evidenced through this analysis, the proposed control house is consistent with the Conditional Use Permit decision criteria outlined in RMC 4-9-030.D. 1 A substation control house is a shelter containing equipment necessary to monitor and control the operation of the substation. At smaller or older substations this usually takes the form of a weather-protective cabinet, where maintenance and operation of control equipment can be performed by technicians standing outside, and reaching into, the cabinet {"house"). At larger or newer substations, which require more complex control and control-related communications equipment, this will necessarily take the form of a larger weather-protective shelter, which technicians may enter into to service and operate the equipment. This shelter is solely for the purpose of containing the control equipment; compared to other work or storage spaces, a control house is entered only while actively servicing the equipment it contains. • Appropriate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location shall be suited for the proposed use. Response: The proposed location of the control house will not result in detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area. The proposed control house will replace an existing control house within the substation fence. The increased building square footage is minor compared to the scale of the substation footprint. The new control house will be located adjacent to the existing structure used for a control house and will not be substantially larger in size. • Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. Response: The proposed control house will not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The proposed control house will replace an existing control house adjacent to the current structure location within the existing substation fence. The substation is located within a 50 acre site that contains several transmission lines. The substation is located over 460 feet from the nearest residential lot, resulting in no substantial impact to neighboring properties. • Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. Response: The proposed use is compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. Talbot Substation is an existing station that was constructed in the early 1960's. There is an existing control house structure within the substation fence that's use will be replaced with the new structure. The substation is over 460 feet from the nearest residential lot and completely surrounded by transmission corridors. The proposed control house is part of the same use that has been on the site for more than 50 years. • Parking: Adequate parking is, or will be made, available. Response: Adequate parking will be provided for the proposed control house. The existing and proposed control houses are visited by maintenance personnel on a weekly basis and not occupied fulltime. Adequate existing parking is provided for the substation use. • Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and shall mitigate potential effects on the surrounding area. Response: The proposed control house will not result in increased traffic to and from the substation site. Impacts to the surrounding area are not anticipated. • Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use shall be evaluated and mitigated. Response: The proposed control house will have minimal lighting to provide for safe entry and exit into and out of the building. The lighting will be directed downward and not directed offsite. Noise generated by the proposed control house is within the limits allowed by the City's noise ordinance. • Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings, paving, or critical areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Response: This conditional use approval only covers the proposed control house within the substation fence. The area outside the substation fence is landscaped in compliance with applicable codes and standards. DEC O 6 201:~ C J _, I Construction Mitigation Description for PSE Talbot Hill Substation Proposed construction dates: This project is to be constructed in two phases. Phase one includes the civil portions of the job and is proposed for April 2017 to October 2017. Phase two includes assembly of the electrical equipment and is proposed for April 2018 to October 2018. Hours and days of operation: Hours and days of operation are to follow City of Renton normal working hours 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. Proposed hauling and transportation routes: The proposed haul route would be via Puget Orive and Benson Road. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust. traffic, mud. noise. etc.: A TESC plan will be developed and implemented during construction. Dust and mud should not enter the public road right of way. If debris track-out occurs, immediate corrections will be implemented. Any special hours proposed: There are no special hours proposed at this time. Preliminary traffic control plan: See attached traffic control plan. DEC O 6 2016 :I .. REQUESTED DATES: WORK HOURS: 111/A'//lf ~HIIIGT!Jtjlif~TE Tl\lll'IC WlilllOl ;:.~J tu~~ ,;;;·.-'_,."r-.,-.•• -•• -~\; dl°ALTUS '&,no) 343-2335 Ar;ro$$.AmvrlCll, Afttls Traffic LEGEND Is the trusted nilfrHI for: = 1'/Pll60/'l'l:Mo 0 0 --Traffic m.anagl!lment ··--Flilf/9/ng DlP [)C]l ·--•Traff/,;; ,;rmlrol, afld ............ v...,,, -•Traffic rnanagemootpflms. -1W' ~~---_..,.,,_ MHT#1 .L '"""''.,. .. -Location: 3400 Puget Dr SE Renton, WA 98058 NOT DRAWN TO SCALE [@ ® ,..,, .. _T"'~~ ,.,p,...,. "'" -REVIEWED: For: Puget Sound Energy Name: Molly Reed 425-462-3933 Date: November 14, 2016 0 ~--.... --Drawn By: Matt Hitchcock I ATISA Cert#: 59042 Job#: 111022316 www.altustraffic.com ADDRESS: PERMIT: 3400 Puget Dr SE, Renton, WA 98058 Ragger To Act As Spotter And Facilitate ____ Traffic In Station Lot --- One Lane Road NOTES: **NO PARKING SIGNS** ALL DEVICES TO TO BE SET 24 HOURS CONFORM TO PRIOR TO WORK*' CURRENT MUTCD** Speed (MPH) 30 ~ 40 '-----100' .. , .. ~Taper 100 , / '°±• '-, 100· "'\ I / I --,oo·---.i " 0 0 0 .~ I ~ N W~li,~E 1"1 I s ,. ____ r ___ ,._ •-r---• !LANE WIDTH 10FT)LAI ·-,-- l<:lfl~! Lt;:11~u1 111 rtita ll,HANNtlllAIIUN UtVl\,;t .:::it-'A\,;!Nl.:i I 1--- I o ITAr,.1r..i:MT j _ _ I I I "' •• ,,.,~, •-•~•~•• "~""~ ~"•""'~I SIGN SPACING MPH TAPER TA .......... ,., ROAD I 15<7 165' I 180' I 90' 65 205' 225' 245' I 12" 60 ------· ·--· 270' JJ 40 130 40 120 4:.::, ' TYPE A I B I c .. ~'.·_·" I I 1 oo· 11 oo· 11 oo· 3 -48" Road Work Ahead 2 -48" One Lane Road Ahead 1 -48" Be Prepared to Stop 45 450' 50 500 "" ,w 240' <n ,n 10v Urban .,.,.... 0 " , ...... ' ,:,: An I 110 II s~; .. g I I -----I ---I ---IL -~G i-1agger ~ymoo1 ..--=---.--~~--.--~~--+-~~--+-=--1 -·' . ~r!r! -···· ' • '----.'.!-~!:?~~e-!' 55 550' 605' "" 295' 45 40 90 l~igh 350' 350' 350' 30 -Cones 60 soo· "" 720 350' 65 650' 725' 780 410' 40 40 BO 500' R"'ral 500' 500' " 700' 770' "" 475' 75 750' 825' 900 540' 80 800' "" "" 30 I 30 l 60 E.x.pn,aaway/ 1500'12640' Freeway 1000' '- REQUESTED DATES: WORK HOURS: tfl!.4'//11 ~HIIKmlli $IJ,1l: Tl\llf1C ~ ~~:~:IYJ~R :t:~,.~~. :r· . f:lllaoj • . . . . . ' ~........ t Ae-ro$$ Aniflrlta, Altus Traff/,: I C~END -,-Is tfHI trusted ni,m11 for; I ._._ '-j •Traffic manag1111111111t = ~polll&r<loa<lol 0 0 ~·-~- ADDRESS: 3400 Puget Dr SE, Renton, WA 98058 Flagger To Act As Spotter And Facilitate --- Traffic In Station Lot --- Flagging Operation ~,;- <"' ~ ,... 100· .. r • / -I Taper Length In Feet Spnd (MPH) I LANE WIDTH 10t LANE WDJTH 11FT LANE WIDTH 12FT -- www.altustraffic.com PERMIT: ~ N W~E ''f"' s CHANNELIZATION DEVICE SPACING SIGN SPACING Summary of Devices LOtlll.BUFF MPH TAPER TANGENT ROAD 65 40 130 Location: 3400 Puget Dr SE ---1 OD --_,_ NOTES: -S9'<""""' 1-1~ 30 I 150' 165' 180' ., 205' 225' 245' 120' 40 T 270' .,--· ~~~· -~~· 45 I "" • I I I I r · 48" Road Work Ahead A B C 3 -48" Be Prepared to Stop 100' 1 00' 100' 2 · 48" Flagge, Symbol ;;:. I ;:~ I ;;;. I : I :~ I ;~~ I ~ •. ;.. 13. Flagger TYPE 60 40 120 U,baa 55 40 110 I ~OW-~ 50 40 100 Urban 20) 343-2335 -Flagging~ 95· 40 100 I .,,.mrnam,1, •ml , 495 , 540 1 50 "'"'"' _.,_0pf,a,. m5ll 45 ,: 550 , 600' 240 45 40 90 ,orn,AW"'.oSCAcel ~ I I -I-~ 1 ····--·---···-----•• """ Renton, WA 98058 For: Puget Sound Energy Name: Molly Reed 425-462-3933 Date: November 14, 2016 Drawn By: Matt Hitchcock I ATISA Cert#: 59042 Job#: 111022316 ·~ ~-I ® I='"'· I **NO PARKING SIGN:> •• ALL U1'VlL1':} l u '~ TO BE SET Z4 HOURS CONFORM TO 0 j---• I PRIOR TO WORK** CURRENT MUTCD** ,-1 ....... 50 500' 550' 600' 241' 55 550' 605' 660' 295' 60 600' 660' 720' 350' 65 650' 725' "" 410' 70 700' m 840' 475· 75 750' 825" 91)0' SW BO BOD' 880' ""' 45 40 90 High 80 -Rural 50 Ml<' lllm' ?Q<;' REVIEWED. 01 ; .... 30 350' I 350' I 350' 500' I 500' I 500' 30 60 =:~w•" 11000'[ 1500'12640' Print Form Reset Form Save Form DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -------Renton 8 TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov 1. Total number of trees over 6" diameter', or alder or cottonwood trees at least 8" in diameter on project site 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dangerous 2 Trees in proposed public streets Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts Trees in critical areas' and buffers Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 97 0 0 0 0 0 97 80 at storm water pond site and 17 in area of selective removal trees trees trees trees trees trees trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained 4, multiply line 3 by: Trees #10-12, 22-48, 0.3 in 20nes RC, R-1, R-4, R-6 or R-8 r-106, 107, 110 through 0.2 in all other residential 20nes 112 and 114. 0.1 in all commercial and industrial zones 5. List the number of 6" in diameter, or alder or cottonwood trees over 8" in diameter that you are proposing5 to retain 4 : 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (if line 6 is zero or less, stop here. No replacement trees are required) 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 10 trees 34 \'' trees (24) trees (288) inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required for replacement, otherwise enter 0) 0 inches per tree 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6: (If remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number) 0 trees 1 Measured at 4.5' above grade. 2 A tree certified, in a written report, as dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or otherwise dangerous to persons or property by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborist, and approved by the City. 3 Critical areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in RMC 4-3-050. 4 Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. 5 The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a. 6 When the required number of protected trees cannot be retained, replacement trees, with at least a two-inch {2") caliper or an evergreen at least six feet (6') tall, shall be planted. See RMC 4-4-130.H.l.e.(ii} for prohibited types of replacement trees. 1 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Tree Retention Worksheet.docx 08/2015 Minimum Tree Density A minimum tree density shall be maintained on each residentially zoned lot (exempting single-family dwellings in R-10 and R-14). The tree density may consist of existing trees, replacement trees, or a combination. Detached single-family development': Two (2) significant trees 8 for every five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of lot area. For example, a lot with 9,600 square feet and a detached single-family house is required to have four (4) significant trees or their equivalent in caliper inches (one ar more trees with a combined diameter of 24"}. This is determined with the following formula: ( LotArea ) . . b if x 2 = Mrmmum Num era Trees 5,000sq.ft. Multi-family development (attached dwellings): Four (4) significant trees8 for every five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of lot area. (_ Lot Area ) 4 \s,ooosq.ft. x Minimum Number of Trees Example Tree Density Table: Lot Lot size Min significant New Trees Retained Trees Compliant trees required 1 5,000 2 2 @ 2" caliper 0 Yes 2 10,000 4 0 1 tree (24 caliper Yes inches) 3 15,000 6 2 @ 2" caliper 1 Maple-15 Yes caliper inches 1 Fir -9 caliper inches. .,. t ~ .~ -.,..."" . '' ,-.i DEC O 6 2016 7 Lots developed with detached dwellings in the R-10 and R-14 zoned are exempt from maintaining a minimum number of significant trees onsite, however they are not exempt from the annual tree removal limits. 8 Or the gross equivalent of caliper inches provided by one (1) or more trees. 2 H :\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\ Tree Retention Worksheet.docx 08/2015 PSE Talbot Hill Substation Arborist Report To: Jeff McMeekin, PSE From: Tom Early, Otak, Inc. 11241 willows road ne mite 200 Date: December 13, 2016 redmond, wa 98052 phone (425) 822-4446 Project No.: 31983.h Assignment !YC -t . 0 6 ZU1E ' .. J The arborist report is required to accompany a Renton Site Plan Review submittal. It is developed to convey specific information regarding the trees proi:osed for removal, tree protection for trees to be retained and supplemental tree planting suggestions. I am coordinating the integration of tree removal, tree retention and tree protection into the landscape plans of the stormw.tter pond Assessment Methods The inventory of trees was performed on October 13, 2016. The inventory is tabulated in the tree table which includes an assignment of tree number, identification of tree species by common and botanical names, diameter at breast height (D BH) measurement, a condition assessment using five categories (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor and Dead) based on visual tree inspection of each tree, comments specific to each trees condition and the proposal to either remove or retain the tree. In the case of trees with multiple stems, typically beaked hazelnut trees in this case, I've noted the approximate number of stems and the stems average size. Site description The site address is 3004 Beacon Way South. The location of the subject trees is along the south side and southea;t comer of the PSE Talbot Hill Substation. The land surface i~ undulating with vegetation typical of upland plant species. So:, figure 1. The majority of the trees are in good shape with the exception of the willow and alder; they have been damage::! by recent branch failures during the spring windstorms. K :\project\31S(X)\31983H\ProjectDo:s\Rep:,rts\ Talbot Hill Arborist Rep::nt.doc JeffMcMeekin, PSE Talbot Hil/Arborist Report Page2 December 13, 2016 l'igure 1: goog!e aerial showing suh.1lation area qf selective tree removal on left, area of tree removal j(1r storm 1vater jiuility on right and direction of tree nitmberin,g Work proposed The work proposed is in association with improvements to the PSE Talbot Hill substation. A stormwater detention pond is proposed lo he construe.tee! to the southeast of the substation, see figure 1 ahove. The grading of the stormwater pond will require significant trees to be removed, see the tree tahle for a list of signifiGmt and non-signifi=t trees to he ren1oved. The removal of these significant trees rariires a landscape pbnting effort to lxilster the view buffer planting hetween the neighbors lo the south and the substation to meet the Renton Municipal Code 4-4-070, si=:ifically section F .4.c and H.6.c which call for fully sight obscuring landscape visual buffer. The execution of this planting to meet the letter and intent of the code is diallenging in that the nearest location available for planting is between a maintenance road and the clearance zone of overhead transmission lines managed by Seattle City Light, see figure 2. In light of these mnstraints the fully sight-obscuring landscaped visual buffer is proposed to be 20 feet in width in two locations and contain a mixture of trees and large shrubs, some of which will mature to 35 feet tall. K :\pruject\31900\31~3H\ProjectDocs\ ReJXlrCS\ TallX>t Hill Arborist Report.doc JeffMcMeekin, PSE Talbot I-Jill Arborist Report Page3 December 13, 2016 J-,/~~un: 2: vieJJJ bllf{er planting areas and challenges 1Vith transmission line ckarances and transmi.rsion line /o}})er dearances We are also proposing to remove 11 significmt trees to the ,vest of the entrance driv=ay along the south side of the suhstation, see images 1 and 2. These trees arc numix'fffi 100 through l 05, 108, 109, 113, 115 and 116. They are all Douglas fir trees. The majority of these trees are re-dching a height in which their risk toward the substation is enhanced due to the prevalence of windhlown limbs damaging te·quipmmt within the substation. The exbting shrnhs and smaller trees in this area arc to r=iin to continue to provide their view buffer for the southern neighbors. K : \project\ 31 S()0\31983H\ Project fJ ocs \Reports\ T alhot Hill ArOOrist Report.doc JeffMcMeekin, PSE Talbot HillArborist Report -;.==;--=··\ . . ______ _ Page4 December 13, 2016 Image 1: proposed selective tree removaLr to reduie r£rk far substation, view.from southeast corner of pla;fie!d looking to the north Image 2: 1iew looking north-11ortheast from jmt nor//, o/ 1507 Ro!linx I lillr Avenue SE, dotted line indicates V(getation to remain and dashed line with tran.171arentjil! indicates ve_g,elation lo he removed K :\project\j}'Xl()\:';,198:';,l J\Pruju.JDuc~\HqxJrts\T,.Jl.x>l Hill Arbori.st Repon:.doc Jeff M cMeekin, PSE Talbot 1-/i!!Arborist Report Tree protection recommendations Page5 December 13, 2016 Along with standard TE SC measures, it is recommmded that silt fmce is used to mark the tree protection areas rather than duplicate the fmcing rEqUired on-site. The silt fmce should be placed at or outside of the trees dripline because it will need to be dug in to be correctly installed. In tree protection areas where silt fmce is not proposed, 4 foot tall orange construction fmce should be installed at the dripline or further from the trees to remain. This orange construction fmce should be the same as the limits of clli,turbance. The area of proposed selective tree removals should not rEqllire tree protection fmcing. Tree removals should be planned to control limb and main stern cuts to minimize damage to surrounding vegetation. Existing wildlife snags should be lo=ed in height to be less than their distance to the substation fmce. Supplemental visual buffer plantings The visual buffer plantings include Vine Maple, Western Serviceberry, Beaked Hazelnut, California Wax Myrtle, Silk Tassel and Strawberry Trees planted at 6 feet triangular on-cmter spacing. The vine maple and v,e,tern serviceberry are proposed to be 6 feet tall and the other plants are to be 5 gallon container at the time of iru,tallation. This visual buffer planting is 50% evergrem SJXdes to maximize the screening provided by the planting while also providing some variation to improve ecological services as well as aesthetics. Tom Early, Otak, Inc. Certified Arborist PN -5622A, Tree Risk Assessmmt Qualified Landscape Architect, Washington State# 1199 K :\project\31S(X)\31983H\ProjectDoc:s\Reports\ Tall:x:it Hill Arborist Report.doc PSE Talbot HIii Substation Arborist Report Tree Table Trees at Stormwater Detention Pond Facility Tree# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Slgnlficant per RMC Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes DBH Common Name 10.S Big Leaf Maple 10.S Big leaf Maple 12.5 Alder 8 Alder 4 Alder 6 Alder 12 Alder 18 Alder 6 Alder 10 Alder 28 Cottonwood 6 Big leaf Maple 8 Big leaf Maple 5 Big leaf Maple 14 Alder 10 Alder 10 Alder 10 Alder 12 Alder 10 Big leaf Maple 18 Douglas fir 13 Big leaf Maple 29 Big leaf Maple 6 Big leaf Maple 5 Big leaf Maple 5 Big leaf Maple 6 Big leaf Maple 11 Beaked Hazelnut 8 Big Leaf Maple 14 Alder 13 Alder 16 Alder 21 Douglas fir 19 Douglas fir 7 Beaked Hazelnut 15 Douglas fir 19 Douglas fir 8 Pacific Dogwood 31 Douglas fir 29 Douglas fir 16.5 Douglas fir 10.5 Pacific Dogwood . Botanical Name Condition Acer macrophyllum Fair Acer macrophylfum Fair A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor .. A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor Populus balsamifera Good Acer macrophyllum Fair Acer macrophyllum Fair Acer macrophyllum Fair A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Poor •.. A/nus rubra Poor Acer macraphyllum Fair Pseudotsuga menziesii Fair Acer macrophyllum Poor Acer macrophyllum Good Acer macrophyllum Fair Acer macrophyllum Good Acer macrophyllum Poor Acer macrophyllum Poor Cory/us cornuta Good Acer macrophyllum Fair A/nus rubra Poor A/nus rubra Fair A/nus rubra Dead Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Cory/us cornuta Good Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Camus nuttallii Good Pseudatsuga menziesii Good Pseudatsuga menziesii Good Pseudatsuga menziesii Good Camus nuttallii Fair Comments sweeping trunk indicates fill placed while sapling topped @12' lost & regenerating main stem lost main stem, regenerating with big natural sweep, suppressed by #23 lost main stem regenerating with 3 acutE:_a_ttachments 10% live canopy ratio (lCR) currently a snag . thin canopy 1 of4 Remove or Retain Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Retain Retain Retain Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Retain Retain Remove Remove Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain -~--- Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain Retain - PSE Talbot HIii Substation Arborist Report Tree Table Trees at Stormwater Detention Pond Facility 2 of 4. Significant Remove or Tree# per RMC DBH Common Name Botanical Name Condition Comments Retain 43 No 4.5 Beaked Hazelnut Cory/us cornuta Good ----· Retain 44 No 3 Beaked Hazelnut Cory/us cornuta Good Retain 45 Yes 24 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Good . __ -·-·--Retain 46 Yes 10.5 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Fair lost leader, suppressed by tree #45 Retain 47 Yes . __ 6 Big Le~-.~~__e_!e Acer macrophyllum Good Retain 48 Yes . ~~ 24 Do~g~':~~~ Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Retain 49 Yes 20 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menzi~sjj_ _ Good Remove 50 Yes 9.5 Willow Salix sitchensis Good Remove 51 Yes 11 Willow Solix sitchensis Fair 2 stems rising from failed stem on ground Remove 52 Yes 6 Willow Solix sitchensis Fair 10% LCR Remove 53 Yes 6 Willow Salix sitchensis Fair 10% LCR Remove ---- 54 Yes 9 Willow Solix sitchensis Fair Access road clearance si~e-pruned Remove 55 Yes 8 Pacific Dogwood Cornus nuttallii Fair Canopy die-back and storm damag~-· Remove 56 No 4 Beaked Hazelnut Cory/us cornuta Good Remove 57 Yes 21.5 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Remove 58 Yes 12.5 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Fair Lost leader and suppressed by tree #57 Remove 59 No 5 Beaked Hazelnut Cory/us cornuta Good Remove ----- 60 Yes 26.5 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Remo"" 61 Yes 20 Doutlas fir -·-·-----· -·-Remo~ Pseudotsu']_a menziesii Good UL <CO .::..L,..J '-'VIAl5I<>'> Ill r.:i,;;;udotsuga menziesii Good rit;:IIIUVt: 63 Yes 17 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Poor Included bark at base 3x stem diameter, suppressed by tree #64 Remove i 64 Yes 33 l?_ouglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Remove 65 Yes 32.3 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Remove 66 Yes 24 Douglas fir Pseudotsl.!_ga menziesii Good Remove -·· 67 No 3.5 Beaked Hazelnut Cory/us cornu.ta Good Remove ------- 68 Yes 26 Big Leaf Maple Acer mocrophylfum Good Remove 69 Yes 42 Cottonwood Popufus balsamifera Good Tree has reached maturity-sudden limb drop potential is high Remove ·- 70 Yes 32 Cottonwood Populus balsamifera Good Suppressed by 42" cottonwood (#69), natural west lean 5° Remove --·---· 71 Yes 6 Beaked Hazelnut Cory/us cornut'!. __ . Good Remove 72 Yes 6 Beaked Hazelnut Cory/us cornuta Good Remove ··-·- 73 Yes 22 Alder A/nus rubra Poor Main stem die-back "'20% Remove ... 74 Yes 24 Alder A/nus rubra Fair Remove , ____ 75 No 6 Alder A/nus rubra Poor Suppressed by tree !!?4 Remove 76 No 6 Alder A/nus rubra Poor 15% LCR and ~eper canopy die-back Remove 77 No 6 Alder A/nus rubra Fair Remove . ·-· 78 No 6 Alder A/nus rubra Fair Remove ··----·--- 79 No 6 Alder A/nus rubra Fair Remove 80 Yes 9 Alder A/nus rubra Fair Remove 81 Yes 12 Alder A/nus rubra Poor Dying Remove 82 Yes 18 Cottonwood Populus balsamifera Good Remove 83 Yes 18 Cottonwood Populus bo/samifera Good Remove 84 Yes 7 Willow Salix sitchensis Poor Transmission line clearance pruned Remove PSE Talbot HIii Substation Arborist Report Tree Table Trees at Stormwater Detention Pond Facility Tree# 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 Total Significant per RMC Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Significant 80 Trees DBH Common Name 17 Willow 8 Beaked Hazelnut 5.5 Beaked Hazelnut 11 Hawthorn 32 Willow 8 Willow 14 Willow 16 Willow 6 Alder 6 Alder 8 Alder 6 Willow 18 Willow 12 Willow 14 Willow Botanical Name Condition Comments Salix sitchensis Poor Transmission line clearance pruned Cory/us cornuta Good Cory/us cornuta Good Crataegus douglasii Fair Suppressed by 32" willow {#89) Salix sitchensis Good Salix sitchensis Poor Suppressed by 14" willow {#91) Salix sitchensis Fair Canopy die-back and storm damage Salix sitchensis Poor Storm damage to 30% of canopy A/nus rubro Fair A/nus rubro Fair A/nus rubro Fair Salix sitchensis Fair Salix sitchensis Fair Salix sitchensis Good Salix sitchensis Poor .. .. Total to Significant Trees to Retain Total to Significant Trees to Remove 3 of4 Remove or Retain Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove ·- Remove Remove Remove Remove 28 52 PSE Talbot HIii Substation Arborist Report Tree Table Selective Tree Removal to Southwest of PSE Substation Tree# 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 i-------- 107 108 f-----·--- 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 I 116 Total Significant perRMC Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Significant 17 Trees DBH Common Name 23 Douglas fir 19 Douglas fir 8 Douglas fir 25 Douglas fir 11 Douglas fir 24 Douglas fir 20 Big leaf maple 23 Big leaf maple 28 Douglas fir 20 ___ D(?~glas fir ---- 16 Madrone 8 Pacific dogwood 8 Pacific dogwood 32 Douglas fir 12 Douglas fir 24 Douglas fir 16 Douglas fir Botanical Name Condition Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Pseudotsuga menziesii Fair Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Acer macrophyllum Good Acer macrophyllum Poor Pseudotsuga menziesii Poor Pseudotsuga menziesii Poor Arbutus menziesii Good Camus nuttallii Good Camus nuttallii Good Pseudatsuga menziesii Dead Pseu~atsuga menziesii Dead Pseudotsuga menziesii Good Pseudotsuga menziesii Fair Comments Suppressed by tree #103 - Topped@ 30' Tappe~_@ 50' Two stems with union at 42" topped @ 50' snag that was topped @ 65' and still poses a risk to substation snag -- Suppressed by 24" Douglas fir (#115) - Total to Significant Trees to Retain Total to Significant Trees to Remove 4 of4 Remove or Retain Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Remove Retain Retain Remove Remove Retain Retain Retain Remove Retain Remove Remove 6 11 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ----~Renton 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov ., .. _t DEC O 6 2016 ., ) Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental·· impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: [help] . ·' This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining ifthere may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy ofthe checklist and other supporting documents. 1 Z:\MLP Municipal Land Planners\6A Projects\Talbot Hill Substatlon\Talbot Site Plan Submittal\Talbot SEPAJM12_14.docRev: 08/2015 USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Ihfilt?l For non project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proponent", and "affected geographic area" respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B -Environmental Elements -that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. For help go to: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html A. BACKGROUND Ihfilt?l 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Ihfilt?l Talbot Hill Substation Improvements 2. Name of applicant: Ihfilt?l Puget Sound Energy, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Ihfilt?l Address: PO Box 97034 PSE-09N Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 Contact: Jeff McMeekin (425)462-3824 Jeff.mcmeekin@pse.com 4. Date checklist prepared: .[bg!p] November 2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ihfilt?l City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule {including phasing, if applicable): Ihfilt?l Phase 1 includes most of the civil work and is scheduled for 2017. Phase 2 includes assembly of equipment and is scheduled for 2018. 2 Enter file location: 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. D:@Q1 There are no future plans to expand the substation footprint at this point. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. lilll!.Q] • Geotechnical Report • Drainage Report • Civil Plans • Landscape Plans • Arbori st Report 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. D:@Q1 There are no applications pending for governmental approval at this time. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. D:@m Utility Construction Permit -City of Renton Site Plan Review -City of Renton Conditional Use Permit -City of Renton Building Permit -City of Renton Construction General Permit, NPDES -Ecology 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) lilll!.Qj The proposal is to rebuild a portion of the Talbot Hill Substation, to replace aging equipment and provide more reliability for the transmission lines connected to the substation. An existing control house will be replaced with a new control house adjacent to the existing structure. The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence will be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. Some transmission line work outside the substation fence may be required however no additional transmission lines will be added with the rebuild of this project. A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. There are 97 significant trees on-site -80 at the stormwater pond site and 17 in 3 Enter file location: the area of selective removal. The area of selective removal is located west of the substation access gate along the southwest fence line. We are proposing to remove 63 significant trees and retain 34. See attached arborist report for detailed information. Additional driveway improvements are required to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.~ Talbot Hill Substation located on the South% of Section 20, T23N ROSE, and tax parcel numbers 202305906, 2023059003 and 2023059064. The address is 2400 S Puget Drive. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS~ 1. EARTH 4 Enterfile location: a. General description of the site~ (check or circle one): Q3) rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?~ Based to the topographic map survey the steepest slope is about 30 pefcent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils.~ The substation yard is surfaced with yard rock. Soils in the project area are predominately glacial till but include localized areas of ice-contact glacial deposits overlying the till. The area does not include agricultural land. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.~ There are no noted indications or known history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.~ A new storm drainage system will be constructed within the fenced area and a detention pond will be installed south of the southerly substation fence. The substation footprint will remain unchanged. The storm improvements will require the removal of 120 trees. Additional driveway improvements are required to allow larger vehicle access to the substation. In order to accomplish this total disturbed area will equal approximately 227,370 square feet. The cut will be about 11,500 cubic yards and fill of about 9,000 cubic yards. After construction the area of impervious surface will equal about 78,131 square feet and the pervious surface: 149,238 square feet. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ~ During construction, temporary measures will be implemented to reduce the possibility of soil erosion, such as temporary sediment barriers and mulching. However, erosion resulting in an off-site discharge is unlikely, as the project will be constructed in an area that is essentially flat. Where erosion could occur, appropriate best management practices (BMP) will be implemented. s Enter file location: g. About what percent ofthe site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? I!:!§.!Q] Approximately 78,100 square feet will be covered with impervious surfaces after the project. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: I!:!§.!Q] Based on the existing and proposed final grade of the property, no erosion would occur that could affect off-site properties. All storm water control during construction and operation will be maintained on site. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. I!:!§.!Q] Construction: Construction could result in fugitive dust from excavation and backfilling _operations as well as __ exhaust emissions generated from construction equipment. While in operations and maintenance emissions may be produced from occasional vehicular use by maintenance personnel. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Ihfill:!l The proposal will not be affected by off-site sources of emissions or odors. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Ihfill:!l Watering may be used to control dust if necessary. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: Ihfill:!l 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Ihfill:!l There is no surface water body on or in the vicinity of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to {within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Ihfill:!l There is no surface water body on or within 200-feet of the proposal therefore, no work in or over waters. 6 Enter file location; 3} Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ~ None No 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.~ 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.~ The proposal does not lie within a 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve ·any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.~ The proposal does not involve any discharges of any materials into any waters. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. [help] No groundwater will be withdrawn for the proposal. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals 6r humans the system(s) are expected to serve.~ Waste material will not be discharged into the ground. c. Water runoff (including storm water}: 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.~ 7 Enter file location: The site contains an existing electric substation, gravel driveway, and pond. Stormwater runoff from the substation is collected via catch basins in the yard and conveyed to the detention pond, the pond outfalls to the south (the natural location) on the other side of the gravel access drive, the outfall is the natural low spot in the surrounding topography. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.~ Waste materials will not enter the ground or surface waters. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. Drainage patterns will not be altered due to this project. Also, the substation footprint won't change due to this project. There is an existing detention pond that will be expanded to mitigate increased runoff from new and replaced impervious surfaces. The outfall for the pond will remain in the same location on the south side of the access road. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: There is an existing detention pond that will be expanded to mitigate increased runoff from new and replaced impervious surfaces. The outfall for the pond will remain in the same location on the south side of the access road. 4. PLANTS~ a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:~ _X_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X_shrubs _x__grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?~ 8 Enter file location: An area of about 45,000 square feet to the south and southeast of the station will be cleared of mature trees and shrubs in order to rebuild and expand the stormwater pond. There are 97 significant trees on-site -80 at the stormwater pond site and 17 in the area of selective removal. We are proposing to remove 63 significant trees and retain 34. See attached arborist report for detailed information. An arborist report is attached for more information. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. I!:!§Q} There are no known threatened or endangered plant species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: I!:!§Q} The landscaping proposed includes a variety of native pl;mts, shrubs, and trees as shown on the attached landscaping plan. Trees that are considered a danger to the substation will be cut and left as wildlife snags. The attached landscape plan and arborist report provide more detail. e. Lisfall noxious weeds and invasive species known fo be on or near the site. Noxious weeds and invasive species in the area include Scotch broom, evergreen blackberry, and Himalayan blackberry. 5. ANIMALS a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: I!:!§Q} Birds: hawk, heron, eagle~other: ------------ Mammals:9 bear, elk, beaver, other: ____________ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _________ _ b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. I!:!§Q} There are no known threatened or endangered animal species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. I!:!§Q} The site is within the Pacific Flyway. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Imlli2l The conifer trees located to the immediate south west of the driveway access will be snagged for the benefit of the wildlife. 9 Enter file location: e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. There are no known invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. [bfilQ] The proposal is to rebuild existing energy infrastructure, it does not have additional energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. [bfilQ] The proposal will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. The proposed rebuild is in the same footprint as the existing development and will not increase in height. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: [bfilQ] Energy conservation features are not applicable to this proposal. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result ofthis proposal? If so, describe. [bfilQ] 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. There are no known contamination issues at the site. Any spills from mineral oil filled equipment would either be contained on site or responded to immediately from PSE's spill response from their spill program. The proposal includes replacing the oil filled breakers with Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) gas breakers which are non-flammable and non-toxic. The breakers do produce a corrosive substance with internal arcing which is contained inside the breaker. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. There are no known existing hazardous chemicals or conditions that might affect the project 10 Enter file location: development and design. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. The substation transformer contains synthetic or mineral oil for cooling. A spill prevention, control, and countermeasure (SPCC) facility system will be installed around the transformer to contain the oil, in the unlikely event that a transformer leaked or a spill should occur. SPCC facilities consist of a concrete curb, bentonite clay-lined bottom, crushed rock fill, an oil stop float valve, and manual gate valve. The containment is sized to hold the entire oil content of the transformer. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services are required at the substation. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A spill prevention, control and countermeasure (SPCC) plan will be prepared for the transformer. Additionally, secondary containment will be installed at the substation with the capacity of containing the transformer oil. No other hazards will result from the proposed project; therefore, no additional measures to reduce such hazards have been proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? .ll:!ltlQ] Off-site generated noise will not affect the proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site . .ll:!ltlQ] Noise will be generated during construction primarily by the operation of heavy equipment. Construction activity is exempt from the state and county noise limits (WAC 173-60-050(3)(a)). Construction activities will likely occur Monday through Saturday, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Noise levels emanating from the operation of the substation will be at or below noise ordinance thresholds at the property lines. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: .ll:!ltlQ] Construction will be limited to normal working hours. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe . .ll:!ltlQ] 11 Enter file location: The current use of the site is Utility and will not change. The proposal will not affect nearby or adjacent uses. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-forest use? IbfilQ} The project has not been used as working farmlands or working forest lands in recent history. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: The proposal will not affect or be affected by work farm or forest land. c. Describe any structures on the site. IbfilQ} The structures on site include a control house, foundations for equipment, and poles. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? IbfilQ} The existing 230kV substation equipment inside the fence will be removed, including steel structures and foundations. The new equipment will be reconfigured to create a more efficient and more reliable substation and allow for flexible functioning of the system. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IbfilQ} The site is zoned R-8. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? IbfilQ} The comprehensive plan designation for the site is Residential Medium Density. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? IbfilQ} Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. IbfilQ} The City of Renton (COR) maps show the area to be within a coalmine hazard zone with sensitive slopes nearby. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? IbfilQ} 12 Enter file location: This facility will not require the addition of staff for its operation. During operation, occasional visits by PSE personnel or their contractors would be required to perform inspections and maintenance activities. Therefore, no increase in personnel will be required. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?~ Displacement of people will not occur as a result of this project. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:~ Displacement will not occur; therefore, no measures to avoid or reduce displacement have been proposed. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ~ The proposal includes a landscape plan that is intended to buffer the project from the views of the nearby residents and community club. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: There are no nearby agricultural and forest lands nearby therefore no proposed measures. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.~ No additional units will be required for the proposed project. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.~ No units will be eliminated as a result of the proposed project .. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:~ There are no proposed measures. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?~ 13 Enter file location: Towers located within the substation will be approximately 35 feet tall. New transmission poles will be upwards of 80 feet in height. The proposed control house will be approximately 19 feet tall. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Ihfill2] No views in the immediate vicinity would be obstructed as a result of the proposed project. However, views in the immediate vicinity of the substation site and along the transmission route will be altered. The existing vegetation will be removed and replaced with new landscaping as shown on the landscape plan. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Ihfill2] Enhanced landscaping will be part of the substation project. Landscaping has been designed to meet or exceed Renton Code requirements. These activities will help improve aesthetics and safety around the facility. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Ihfill2] To the extent possible, security lighting within the substation will be shielded and facing down to prevent glare. Substation lighting is typically limited to two lights near the doors of the metalclad switchgear cabinet. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Ihfill2l Based on the proposed lighting configuration, light or glare from the completed project would not present a safety concern or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Ihfill2] No existing off-site sources of light or glare will impact the proposed project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Ihfill2] Substation lighting will be constructed in a way that will best minimize potential impacts. Security lighting within the substation will be shielded and facing down to prevent glare; to the extent possible, it will be mounted below the level of the surrounding fence and landscaping. The metal substation equipment will be a matte finish in order to absorb rather than reflect light. 14 Enter file location: 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? ~ The property to the south which is owned by Puget Sound Energy is used by the Rolling Hills Community and includes a volleyball court, a baseball or multi-use field, a basketball court, and tennis courts. There are trails in the vicinity as well, presumably used for walking and biking. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.~ The proposed project as currently designed would not displace any recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:~ The landscape plan has been designed to avoid impact the nearby recreation. There is a Seattle City Light transmission line that parallels the proposal and hinders the planting potential. So, in r:>rder to eliminate impacts to the recreation opportunities the landscape buffer plimts are tr:> be installed inside and on the edges of the proposed stormwater pond. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe.~ A review of the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation's (DAHP) Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD) did not indicate the presence of buildings, structures, or sites on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Is there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources.~ There are no landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.~ 15 Enter file location: Methods used to assess potential impacts include a review of the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation's (DAHP) Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. If a potential new site or resource was encountered during construction, activities will be halted and local authorities and the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) will be notified immediately. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any . .lt!filQ] The substation property is accessed from South Puget Drive. The access driveway will remain in its current location however; the approach apron will be improved with asphalt and a security gate. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? .lt!filQ] Not applicable. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? .lt!filQ] There is no need for designated parking spaces; therefore, the completed project would not have designated parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . .lt!filQ] The project will not require any new paved roads, except for the new asphalted driveway. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe . .lb..!tl!tl The project will not use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? .lt!filQ] 16 Enter file location: The project will not generate a significant number of vehicle trips during construction or operation. Daily trips during construction will likely include delivery of materials and commuting of the construction crew. No additional trips will be required during operation of the substation, except for routine inspections and operation, which would be approximately once per week. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. The proposal will not interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:~ There are no measures proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.~ There will not be an increased need for public service as a result of this project. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.~ As there will not be an increase in the need for public services, no measures to reduce or control impacts are being proposed. 16. UTILITIES a. Check or circle utilities currently available at the site:~ ~ natural gas, ~ refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other --------------- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.~ The landscaping may require a new water connection for irrigation. 17 Enter file location: C. SIGNATURE lt!filru The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Proponent Signature: t6Ji-~ · Name ofSignee (print~ 0 /eFF f/1e Mt::GK1tv Position and Agency/Organization: f>/2. i.P-n o /Ol..1<1,.J ,.;c,e Date Submitted: ---------- 18 Enter file location; Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Talbot Substation Improvements Renton, Washington for Puget Sound Energy December 5, 2016 • • Geotechnlcal Engineering Services Report Talbot Substation Improvements Renton, Washington for Puget Sound Energy December 5, 2016 GEOENGINEER~ Plaza 600 Building 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1700 Seattle, Washington 98101 206.728.2674 Geotechnlcal Engineering Services Report Talbot Substation Improvements Renton, Washington Prepared for: Puget Sound Energy 355110'"Avenue NE, EST-04W Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attention: Christopher Russell, PE Prepared by: GeoEnglneers, inc. Plaza 600 Building 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1700 Seattle, Washington 98101 206. 728.267 4 Rrincipal TDB:OJT:tt FIie No. 0186-953-00 December 5, 2016 Disclaimer. Any electronlcfonn, tacs!mlle or Ila rd copy of the orlglnal document (emall, text, table, andjorftg&n), H pruvlded, and any attachments are only a copy of the orlglnal document The crtglnal document: Is stored b)' GeoEnglneers, Inc. andwHI seNe as the official doaunent of record. GEoENGINEERS t/J Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE .................................................................................................................................... 1 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ................................................................................................ 1 Field Explorations ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................................................................... 1 SITE CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Geology ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Surface Conditions ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Subsurface Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3 Critical Areas ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Earthquake Engineering ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2012 IBC Seismic Design Information ........................................................................................................ 3 Shallow and Mat Foundations ............................................................................................................................ 4 General .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Bearing Pressure ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Embedment.. ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Settlement.. ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Lateral Resistance ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Construction Considerations ........................................................................................................................ 5 Drilled Shafts ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 General .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Axial Capacity ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Lateral Capacity ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Drilled Shaft Settlement ............................................................................................................................... 6 Construction Considerations ........................................................................................................................ 6 Retaining Walls .................................................................................................................................................... 7 General .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 I nfi ltrati on ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Stormwater Pond ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Earthwork ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Clearing .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Subgrade Preparation ................................................................................................................................... 7 Erosion and Sedimentation Control ............................................................................................................. 7 Structural Fill ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Weather Considerations ............................................................................................................................... 9 Temporary Slopes ......................................................................................................................................... 9 LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 GEOENGINEER~ December5.20161 Pagei Ale No. 0186-953.00 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Plan Figure 3. Spread Footing Capacity APPENDICES Appendix A. Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing Figure A-1-Key to Exploration Logs Figures A-2 through A-8 -Logs of Borings Figures A-9 and A-10 -Sieve Analysis Results Appendix B. Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use GEOENGINEER~ December 5, 2016 · Page ii File No. 0186-953-00 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE This report summarizes the results of GeoEngineers, lnc.'s (GeoEngineers) geotechnical engineering services for the proposed improvements to the existing Puget Sound Energy (PSE) Talbot substation. The site is located west of Beacon Way South in Renton, Washington. The site is shown in relation to the surrounding area on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1, and the Site Plan, Figure 2. We provided a draft version of this report dated November 3, 2014 and a final version dated July 15, 2015. This revised final report incorporates additional critical areas recommendations and recommendations for the stormwater pond and supersedes our previous reports as described. We understand PSE is planning several phases of work at the existing 230-kV substation. Phase 1 involves the replacement of the existing 230 kV transformer located in the middle of the existing substation. The replacement transformer will be supported on a mat foundation. We understand Phase 1 began permitting at the end of 2014 and that the construction has been completed. In 2014, the plan for Phase 2 involved grading to expand the substation to the east, toward Beacon Way South and the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) 230-kV Maple Valley substation located on the east side of Beacon Way South. Phase 2 also includes construction of new 230-kV dead-end towers as well as support of light equipment. The dead-end towers may be supported on either mat foundations or on drilled shafts. We understand that Phase 2 was scaled back from what was originally planned in 2014 and the substation footprint will not be expanded. We have left recommendations related to the expansion in our report for documentation purposes. We understand that stormwater infiltration is not planned at the site, based on the mapped soil conditions. However, a stormwater detention pond is planned southeast of the existing substation yard. Our geotechnical engineering services were completed in general accordance with our proposal dated August 19, 2014. Our scope of work included: • Completing seven borings at the site; • Completing laboratory testing on selected soil samples from the borings; • Providing geotechnical conclusions and recommendations for the proposed improvements; and • Preparing this report. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Fleld Exploratlons The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by completing seven borings (GEl-1 through GEl-7) to depths of 161/, to 311/, feet below existing site grades. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. A detailed description of the field exploration program is presented in Appendix A. Laboratory Testing Soil samples were obtained during the exploration program and taken to GeoEngineers' laboratory for further evaluation. Selected samples were tested for the determination of percent fines, moisture content, GeoENGINEER~ December 5, 2016 ! Page 1 File No. 0186-9SJ-OO and grain size distribution (sieve analysis). A description of the laboratory testing and the test results are presented in Appendix A or on the exploration logs, as appropriate. SITE CONDITIONS Geology We reviewed available geologic maps, including the "Geologic map of the Renton quadrangle, King County, Washington" (D.R. Mullineaux, 1965) and the "Geologic Map of King County, Washington" (D. B. Booth et al. 2007). The soils mapped in the project vicinity are predominantly glacial till (Qvt), but include localized areas of ice-contact glacial deposits (Qvi) overlying the till. Glacial till typically consists of a dense to very dense heterogeneous mixture of sand, gravel, cobbles and occasional boulders in a silt and clay matrix that were deposited beneath a glacier. A zone of weathered till typically overlies the glacial till to depths of several feet below the ground surface. The ice-contact deposits tend to be similar in character to the till, but are less dense. Advance outwash is interpreted below the glacial till, based on the subsurface explorations and the geologic maps. Advance outwash generally consists of dense to very dense sand and gravel deposited by streams and rivers issuing from advancing ice sheets and subsequently overridden by a glacier. Surface Conditions The existing substation is bounded by Beacon Way South to the east, and undeveloped properties to the north, west and south. The substation is accessed by a gravel driveway off Puget Drive SE and connects to the south side of the existing substation. The substation yard is relatively flat and is surfaced with yard rock. Transmission lines generally run east and west from the substation. These include two sets of lines that connect this substation with the BPA Maple Valley substation to the east. The topography in the area of the proposed expansion is hummocky and irregular and is about 10 feet higher than the substation and approximately 15 feet higher than Beacon Way South. Vegetation in the expansion area consists of deciduous trees near the southeast corner of the existing substation and brush and blackberries in the other undeveloped areas. There is a city of Seattle water main that runs along Beacon Way South and an underground cable that connects the PSE and BPA substations. The approximate locations of the water main and underground cable are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Other utilities may be present. Subsurface Conditions We explored subsurface conditions at the substation site by drilling seven borings (GEl-1 through GEl-7) at the locations shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Appendix A presents details of the field exploration and laboratory testing programs, including logs of borings. Borings GEl-1 through GEl-4 were completed inside the existing substation and encountered approximately 2 to 7 feet of fill overlying glacial till. The fill generally consisted of loose sand and silty sand with variable gravel content. The glacial till generally consisted of dense to very dense silty sand with variable gravel GEoENGINEER~ December 5, 2016 i Page 2 File No. 0186-953-00 content and extended to depths of 7 to 23 feet. Advance outwash consisting of very dense sand was encountered below the glacial till in all four borings and extended to the depths explored (21'12 to 31 V, feet). Borings GEl-5 through GEl-7 were completed in the area of the proposed expansion and encountered approximately 2 to 7 feet of fill consisting of loose sand and organic-rich topsoil and duff overlying glacial till. The glacial till generally consisted of dense to very dense silty sand with variable gravel content and extended to depths of 8 to 23 feet. Advance outwash consisting over very dense sand was encountered in all three borings below the glacial till and extended to the depths explored (16¥2 to 31 V, feet). Groundwater was not encountered during drilling, as noted on the exploration logs. These observations represent a short-term condition that may not be representative of the long-term groundwater conditions at the site. Groundwater conditions observed during drilling should be considered approximate. Groundwater level is anticipated to vary as a function of precipitation, season and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Crltlcal Areas We reviewed the City of Renton online maps with regard to geologic critical areas including coal mine, erosion, flood, landslide and steep slope hazard areas. The site is not mapped in erosion or flood hazard areas. The site is mapped in a moderate coal mine hazard area. However, based on the depth of historical coal mining activity and the relatively shallow depth of the proposed improvements, it is our opinion there is a low coal mine hazard at the site. The site is mapped in a 25 to 40 percent steep slope area and in a moderate landslide hazard area. It is our opinion that the proposed improvements will not adversely affect the stability of the slopes in or around the site. Based on our evaluation it is our opinion the soils underlying the substation site have a low risk of liquefying under the design earthquake event. It is also our opinion that soils underlying the site have a low risk of lateral spread and earthquake-induced slope movement. The site is approximately 5 miles south of the Seattle Fault Zone, which is thought to have a recurrence interval on the order of 1,000 years. Based on the distance from the nearest mapped fault, it is our opinion there is a low risk of fault rupture at the site. Earthquake Engineering 2012 IBC Seismic Design Information We recommend the 2012 International Building Code (IBC) parameters for Soil Profile Type, short period spectral response acceleration (Ss), 1-second period spectral response acceleration (S1), and Seismic Coefficients FA and Fv presented in the following table: GEoENGINEER~ December 5, 2016; Page3 File No. 018&953-00 2012 IBC PARAMETERS 2012 IBC Parameter Soil Profile Type Short Period Spectral Response Acceleration, Ss (percent g) 1-Second Period Spectral Response Acceleration, S, (percent g) Seismic Coefficient, FA Seismic Coefficient, Fv Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA (percent g) Note: Recommended Value C 141.3 52.8 1.00 1.30 58.0 The above spectral response accelerations are based on data from the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project. Shallow and Mat Foundations General It is our opinion the proposed structures (replacement 230 kV transformer, breakers, switches and other electrical equipment) may be supported on conventional spread footings or mat foundations bearing on either dense to very dense soils where present at foundation depth, or on a minimum of 2 feet of compacted structural fill in areas of loose to medium dense soils present at foundation depth. Due to space limitations, we understand drilled shafts are preferred for support of the dead-end towers. Our recommendations for drilled shaft foundations are discussed in the "Drilled Shafts" section. Bearing Pressure Allowable Stress Design (ASD). Spread footings may be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). Mat foundations may be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. The allowable soil bearing pressures apply to the total of dead and long-term live loads and may be increased by up to one-third for transient loads such as wind or seismic forces. A subgrade modulus of 180 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for the design of mat foundations. Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). A bearing capacity chart for spread footings is presented in Figure 3. We recommend the LRFD resistance factors listed in the table below be used when evaluating strength, service and extreme limit states for spread footings. The chart is based on a 5-foot wide footing with varying lengths and may conservatively be used for wider footings. The chart was developed in accordance with American Associate of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) methods, in conjunction with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) standards, as summarized in the WSDOT Geotechnical Design Manual. LRFD SPREAD FOOTING RESISTANCE FACTORS UmltState Strength Service Extreme GEoENGINEER~ Shear Resistance to Sliding 0.8 1.0 0.9 Resistance Factor + Bearing 0.45 1.0 0.9 Passive Preesure Resistance to Sliding 0.5 1.0 0.9 December 5, 2016 Page 4 FlleNo. 0186-953-0D Embedment In general, we recommend that the bottom offoundations be embedded at least 24 inches below the lowest adjacent grade for frost protection. The foundation embedment depth may be reduced to 18 inches for small, lightly loaded footings where frost action will not affect equipment performance, or an additional 6-inch-thick layer of gravel that is not susceptible to frost may be placed below the foundations to achieve an embedment of 24 inches. The gravel should meet the requirements of "yard course" surfacing material presented in the "Structural Fill" section of this report. Settlement Provided all loose soil is removed and the subgrade is prepared as recommended under the "Construction Considerations" section below, we estimate that the total settlement of shallow foundations will be on the order of Y2 to 1 inch, with the higher end of that settlement range anticipated in the southwest corner of the substation that is underlain by looser soils. The settlements will occur rapidly, essentially as loads are applied. Differential settlements between comparably loaded foundations are expected to be less than Y2 inch. Lateral Resistance Lateral foundation loads may be resisted by passive resistance on the sides of foundations and by friction on the base of the foundations. For foundations supported on native soils or on structural fill placed and compacted in accordance with our recommendations, the allowable frictional resistance may be computed using a coefficient of friction of 0.4 applied to vertical dead-load forces. The allowable passive resistance may be computed using an equivalent fluid density of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) (triangular distribution) if these elements are poured directly against compacted native soils or surrounded by compacted structural fill. The structural fill should extend out from the face of the foundation element for a distance at least equal to three times the height of the element and be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD). The above coefficient of friction and passive equivalent fluid density values incorporate a factor of safety of about 1.5. Construction Considerations Following excavation for foundations, we recommend the condition of each footing excavation be observed by a qualified geotechnical engineer to evaluate if the work is completed in accordance with our recommendations and that the subsurface conditions are as anticipated. Areas of loose or soft soils present at the foundation subgrade elevation should be overexcavated to a maximum depth of 2 feet and replaced with compacted structural fill. In such instances, the zone of structural fill should extend laterally beyond the footing edges a horizontal distance at least equal to the thickness of the fill. A geotextile separator fabric may be used at the base of the overexcavation if loose/soft soils extend below the depth of the overexcavation. GeoENGINEER~ December 5, 2016 Page 5 File No. 0186-953-0.'.l Drilled Shafts General The proposed new 230-kV dead-end towers as well as lightly-loaded equipment may be supported on drilled shafts. We recommend that the drilled shafts extend to a depth of at least 15 feet below the existing ground surface. We should review the final dead-end tower locations when available and provide modifications to these recommendations if appropriate. Axial Capacity The applied axial loads on the drilled shafts for the dead-end towers are generally very small in comparison to the applied overturning moments, resulting from the tension in the wires along with possible ice and wind loading. The axial capacity of the drilled shafts in compression will be developed primarily from friction and end bearing in the medium dense to dense soils. Provided the drilled shafts are embedded at least 15 feet below the existing ground surface and into dense soils at the tip elevation, we anticipate that the allowable axial capacity for shafts at least 3 feet in diameter will be greater than 100 kips. Lateral Capacity The design of the drilled shafts will be governed by the lateral loads on the structures. The lateral capacity of the drilled shafts will develop from the stiffness of the drilled shaft and the lateral resistance of the soil surrounding the drilled shaft. We anticipate that the shafts will be designed using the L-PILE™ program. For evaluation of the lateral load behavior of the drilled shafts, the parameters in the tables below can be used as input soil parameters for the L-PILE™ program. The table below may conservatively be used for all the drilled shafts. LATERAL PILE ANALYSIS INPUT PARAMETERS SoUParam- Depth (ft) Soil Type (p-y curve model) Effective Unit Weight (lb/ft>) Friction Angle (degrees) p-y Modulus, k (lb/in 3 ) Drilled Shaft Settlement Layer 1 (flll) 0-7 Sand (Reese) 125 32 25 Layer 2 (glaclal tlll) Layer 3 (advance outwasb) 7-10 10-30 Sand (Reese) Sand (Reese) 135 135 38 38 200 150 We estimate that post-construction settlement of drilled shaft foundations, designed and installed as recommended, will be on the order of 1/2 inch or less. Maximum differential settlement of similarly loaded shaft foundations should be less than about one-half the post-construction settlement. Most of this settlement will occur rapidly as loads are applied. Construction Considerations Temporary casing may be required to keep the drilled holes open while drilling through the zones of sandier soils. The contractor may attempt to drill the holes without casing but should have temporary casing available for use if sloughing and caving occurs. Although not encountered in our explorations, cobbles and GEOENGINEERsg December 5, 2016 Page 6 File No. 0186-953-00 boulders may be present. The excavation contractor should be prepared for these conditions. Groundwater was not encountered in our explorations. However, as discussed above, groundwater may be present depending on the conditions at the time of construction and again the contractor should be prepared to deal with these conditions. We recommend that the drilled shaft foundation excavations be observed by GeoEngineers. Retaining Walls General We anticipate retaining walls may be used in conjunction with fill and cut slopes for grade transitions in the area of the substation expansion. Based on the available space, we anticipate concrete block walls (gravity and/or reinforced) will be the preferred wall type. This type of retaining structure is moderately settlement-sensitive, and suitable foundation support is important. We anticipate that some overexcavation of loose soils will be required to achieve suitable foundation support. We can provide recommendations for design of retaining walls once the wall geometries are better defined. Infiltration It may be possible to design stormwater facilities for infiltration, provided the base of the facilities extends to the advance outwash. This may be impractical considering the grades at the site, but we can provide infiltration recommendations if this appears feasible. Stormwater Pond We understand the stormwater pond is planned with 2H:1V (horizontal:vertical) side slopes and a depth of up to 7 feet in the middle. We recommend the side slopes be protected from erosion. Earthwork We understand that earthwork was planned as part of Phase 2 of this project but is no longer anticipated. Regardless, our recommendations for earthwork are presented below. Clearing Removal and demolition of existing site improvements and structures associated with the existing substation should include removal of foundation elements. Existing voids or new depressions created during demolition and site preparation should be cleaned of loose soil or debris and backfilled with compacted structural fill. Subgrade Preparation New foundation subgrade areas should be evaluated after site grading and foundation excavation is completed. Probing should be used to evaluate the subgrade; soft areas noted during probing should be overexcavated and replaced with compacted structural fill as described in the "Shallow and Mat Foundations" section. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Potential sources or causes of erosion and sedimentation depend upon construction methods, slope length and gradient, amount of soil exposed and/or disturbed, soil type, construction sequencing and weather. GeoENGINEER~ December 5, 2016, Page 7 File No. 0186-953·00 Temporary erosion protection should be used and maintained in areas with exposed or disturbed soils to help reduce the potential for erosion and reduce transport of sediment to adjacent areas and receiving waters. Temporary erosion protection should include the construction of a silt fence around the perimeter of the work area prior to the commencement of grading activities. Permanent erosion protection should be provided by re-establishing vegetation or surfacing with rock. Until the permanent erosion protection is established and the site is stabilized, site monitoring should be performed by qualified personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of the erosion control measures and repair and/or modify them as appropriate. Provisions for modifications to the erosion control system based on monitoring observations should be included in the erosion and sedimentation control plan. Structural FIii Materials Materials used for support of structures or pavements or for utility trench backfill are classified as structural fill for the purpose of this report. Structural fill material quality varies depending upon its use as described below: 1. On-site soils may be used as structural fill to support substation equipment provided it can be appropriately moisture conditioned to achieve the required compaction. If on-site soils cannot be moisture-conditioned, imported gravel borrow for support of substation equipment should conform to PSE Base Course Aggregate Specification 1275.1310 as described in the following table: BASE COURSE GRADATION US Standard Sieve Size 3 inch 3.4 inch %inch :1/4 inch U.S. No. 40 U.S. No. 200 Percent Passing (by weight) 100 70-90 60-80 50-70 <30 <5 2. Structural fill placed as "yard course crushed aggregate" surfacing material should be angular crushed rock conforming to PSE Specification 1275.1330 as described in the following table: YARD COURSE GRADATION US Standard Sieve Size 1'f.1 inches 1inch %or% inch %inch GEOENGINEER~ Percent P-lng (by welgllt) 100 60to 100 Oto35 Oto 5 December 5, 2016 Page 8 File No. 0186.953·00 On-site Soils The on-site soils generally contain a significant amount of fines and are moisture sensitive. These soils generally meet the criteria for common borrow and are suitable for use as structural fill only if construction takes place during the drier summer months. Additional considerations for wet weather construction are presented below in the "Weather Considerations" section. FIii Placement and Compaction Criteria Structural fill should be mechanically compacted to a firm, non-yielding condition. In general, structural fill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 to 10 inches in thickness. Each lift should be conditioned to the proper moisture content and compacted to the specified density before placing subsequent lifts. Structural fill should be compacted to the following criteria: • Structural fill placed below foundations or to establish yard subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MOD estimated in accordance with ASTM D 1557. We recommend that a representative from our firm be present during probing of the exposed subgrade soils in structure areas prior to the placement of structural fill and during the placement of structural fill. Our representative would evaluate the adequacy of the subgrade soils and identify areas needing further work, perform in-place moisture-density tests in the fill to evaluate if the work is being done in accordance with the compaction specifications, and advise on any modifications to procedures that may be appropriate for the prevailing conditions. Weather Considerations The on-site soils contain a sufficient percentage of fines (silt) to be moisture sensitive. If the moisture content of these soils is appreciably above the optimum moisture content, these soils become muddy and unstable. During wet weather, operation of equipment on these soils will be difficult, and it will be difficult to meet the required compaction criteria. The wet weather season generally begins in early November and continues through March in Western Washington; however, periods of wet weather may occur during any month of the year. The optimum earthwork period for these types of soils is typically July through October. If wet weather earthwork is unavoidable, we recommend that: • Structural fill placed during the wet season or during periods of wet weather consist of gravel borrow conforming to PSE Base Course Aggregate Specification 1275.1310. • The ground surface in and around the work area be sloped so that surface water is directed away from the work area. The ground surface should be graded such that areas of ponded water do not develop. Measures should be taken by the contractor to prevent surface water from collecting in excavations and trenches. Measures should be implemented to remove surface water from the work area. Temporary Slopes The soils encountered at the site are classified as Type C soil, in accordance with the provisions of Title 296 WAC (Washington Administrative Code), Part N, "Excavation, Trenching and Shoring." We recommend that temporary slopes in excess of 4 feet in height excavated in the on-site soils be inclined no steeper than 11/2H:1V. Flatter slopes may be necessary if localized sloughing occurs. For open cuts at the site we recommend that: GeoENGINEERs_O December5,2016· Page9 file No. 0186.953·00 • No traffic, construction equipment, stockpiles or building supplies be allowed at the top of the cut slopes within a horizontal distance of at least 5 feet from the top of the cut. • Exposed soil along the slope be protected from surface erosion using waterproof tarps or plastic sheeting. • Construction activities be scheduled so that the length of time the temporary cut is left open is kept as short as possible. • Erosion control measures be implemented as appropriate such that runoff from the site is reduced to the extent practical. • Surface water is diverted away from the excavation. • The general condition of the slopes be observed periodically by a geotechnical engineer to confirm adequate stability. Since the contractor has control of the construction operations, the contractor should be made responsible for the stability of cut slopes, as well as the safety of the excavations. All shoring and temporary slopes must conform to applicable local, state and federal safety regulations. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Puget Sound Energy and their authorized agents for the proposed Talbot Substation Improvements in Renton, Washington. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the field of geotechnical engineering in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. Please refer to Appendix B, Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use, for additional information pertaining to use of this report. REFERENCES U.S. Geological Survey Seismic Design Maps, accessed via: http://geohazards.usgs.gov/ designmaps/us/application.php on October 3, 2014. The National Geologic Map Database (NGMDB) portal accessed via: http:/ /ngmdb.usgs.gov/ maps/mapview/ on October 3, 2014. Washington Administrative Code Safety Standards for Construction Work information portal accessed via: http://app.leg.wa.gov/wac/defau1t.aspx?cite=296-155 on October 3, 2014. D. R. Mullineaux, 1965, "Geologic map of the Renton quadrangle, King County, Washington," U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report M200gq, scale 1:24,000. D. B. Booth, K. A. Troost, and A. P. Wisher, 2007, "Geologic Map of King County, Washington," GeoMapNW, scale 1:100,000. GEOENGINEER~ December5,2016 Page 10 File No. 0186-9~-00 ® 0 .cl L-----==--------_J ~ Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are appro)(imate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master -c file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of g this communication. E 3. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for -c personal use or resale, without permission. & Data Sources: ESRI Data & Maps, Street Maps 2005 ~ Transverse Mercator, Zone 10 N North. North American Datum 1983 0 North arrow oriented to grid north 2.000 0 2,000 -----Feet Vicinity Map PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Renton, Washington GEOENGINEERS CJ Figure 1 ... ~ E ,0 0 N :g " /!j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ i: " jl ~ .. ; ~ ~ i[ ~ in N u ii: 9 ~ ~ " ::l 0 5 ~ ~ 0 0 ! ~ ~ " ::l 0 § .. '\ \,'~\ ''~\ lo. \ ~ / / ,, ''< ~ / / I -'"--"" ..,,: / / IL / \ \~ l I I f:>'°J"~~' I \ ~ BPA MAPLE VALLEY SUBSTATION _ / J JI~ -/1,~ ~'-C::.~J,' /\ ,-43 -\t~ ,.!;,C-\ i" / );~>'."':':,"c';"-ilbi~' ',~ ~---f\ I ;1 ;',':__'--;:---=-;,--=-__ -\ 1·~\. ,,--2,,~~ .--"::._ I I ~ X--,r-' I"~'~-" \ \F\ ----, ___ , -t, 1\,) "' \ '"11. I • ' ' • • • • • ' ',,, ' ' ' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CITY OF SEATTLE WATER MAIN ______ --~ I • • • 0 . . GEl-4 -f~ i\\l ',_<,~\-,,w -~L • • 0 0 \ I I 1\ \ 2 \ ---~~-. ' ''' ' ' ' ' . . ,, ' ' -\ -~·-Cl D Cl ,1, ,, , , ', , , --, Q ' ' '' ' ' ' ' ' ~• •• Cl O \ \ \ \ ' '" \ ., X O \ \,,.._-...,, I ~ • . i \~,':_-C_:-0~'~\ \ >jJ; •• • -. ' -----·•\"' ' ' ' ' ' J,-<, -~' '----'---, '\.::<-'-, \ 1>~" \, . ~, .. ' ' ""''' I D l ~, I '-" ',, \ ' \ I ------, I \!-'-'',, -,, '-.: \ . '. -' ' ---' I . • " , ---' . "" ' = , , r I ,---, 1, ----'::_('-"',' ~\ . . . . 1 .. ~ O> c+: GEl•IL ', '::-,-, , ', , ,,.. \ ,=me,o.e~ "' · · · ' ' P, 1/ / ,•, ', ','':C!*' ~',' -"~o 0 \\ ,~ • ~ 0 " ' ' ·-, ~,. _, ,, "' ' ·1 ' ' • . .. 0 -. _,:_ ·:/ ,• ' ', ' , ' "-l":,, "' ' D • -. . ' .. -"TC "',--.,, ,, \ ', \ ',_ J\ \1;\, "' 1>-..':! J... &\\ . . ' , ', ' ' ' ' ,,,, ' ' 0 ' ·1 .,, .. , • , c; =, _ , , , ,, , ( '( \ , 1> v-2~ D 8 ... D 1 . I,\ : ,, ---_; : / / ' " ' : ", "' ~T ', • 4 Sf ' O, (;\/1 \ --1-r-,.~1-7-:f:" \\\/I// l \\\' '\. 1>" \\ I ,e_ 0--. '' ----, '"''" , ", N EW203kV~u · • • •• • • , 11/ 1 1r--,444 1 \1,1.._,_::,,_l'-f'\,~~ ~ 1o \\ "' .. ( " ' ' ' " "",, " '-• ""''"'""'" . ' ' ' "!, .. ' -', """'''-£•, ''-' '-' I ' '.. ,,,,, ' ' ·,,.-.. ,,,.1._, ' 1> . .. ' '. ,. ' ' -, ',, ''' ' ' . ' ,I,,.+ : : r' .:,f \ ::,, / i l , _ ; ! '---;\\-\'< !. "' '\.. I -.. ,,, ' '' . , ,, "'''. " • • • • • ,!,; ), " ", ' ' .. J'' \ I I I I' ' . . ""'' er . ' , , ' , . ' ' , "~" I 000 DO ..... ' ,,:, ', __ , ---\•C·.--~-=-~-;'.i', /LC "-""'"~~~'" . .. . ' ' ' ' ---""' ' --.• , , ..... •=, ' ' ' ' ' " ''' ' x ~·11 '-"/ r \_J '-'--~ ---~---!=-__ CABLE TO BP . . . . 0 .. ~~ T . !i,: 'c., --, • ,, -, -~ .,,_ .._.._ "._-· C Cc'' U>CA>10, o,AuMAPLE VALLEY I • ' •• I -0:.,--1 ' ,_,, ,,,--~---, TION .. OD --'\' ' -,,._,, ,,-,,_/_ ',, SUBSTA X DEAD-END Q .. ' ' , , J' ',' ',,, ,-c,-, ~~ I NEW TOWER r ACCESS GATE ,--D ' -:-. ,1./-1. 1/./fl-!1/ ,T""f'-\ \ PE~;;:~~~ AREA- I.. I., \ ') // / ,.,..,,,. ___ _ 771 J \ f / I 1, J' I . ", ,,,,,,, ___ " ·-" I (. ,, \ \ . , . ;-"'--~ MWATER POND C-:::J:f·o'::__, I li ._;_,_-::;:!!!z~=~ STOR ==:_',.:::-.::;-\\\\ I "-""§;,'-"445.:"=:: l,-x-x-xTx EXISTING SUBSTATION --.. :::: ...._-......., \ ,\\I . 3:,"--~ .=......,..."9_ -::._;...;::.- -_ -::::-:::--:_ "o-~~-f'Y~ ,. ~=~-~A---- --E =--ET DR ES ---;;-, ~, • TO P ---"'~-:;;= ._, ' ' ~,.-, ' ---· ·:::::_-=-~5;::~_-?-~s-'-~ ( l ' ' ---;.-_,,,"~---/-< / -(~-._,:._<--:-::!::~~:::;:~~i~~:f~,~~f:--.:::;;- '""' -I --,,-~--..~..::-,-7) ~--,; ----:::--~~.,,_,,,_, /:,.,,,-, ...... --~ ....,,-......-....--.,,r"2// i J )~~!.>--~30-~_;:-,,, --=~2&--\~T~-- ---- Legend GEl-1 + Boring by Geo Engineers (September 25, 2014) w., s 100 0 100 -----FEET Notes -- 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will seNe as the official record of this communication. Reference: Base topographic survey by David Evans and As..c;ociates, Inc. dated 9-15-14 and PSE cad files dated December, 2016. Site Plan PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Renton, Washington GEOENGINEERS a Figure 2 ~ x ~ -"' u ~ "' u C 0 ., "' -c C :, 0 u. ;;: _Q ni ..c: ;'.l ~ ] "' C <( "' .:! C ..c: u QJ ~ g N "' a, <D "' .... <;:! -C ·g ~ "' ..c: "' 0 9 N N a, J, "' C .. Spread Footing Capacity (chart based on 5' long footing supported on structural fill/glacially consolidated soil) 30 .---,,~..,..~...---.~~...,...I -_-,,_-.~,~""T"~-.~ .. -.. ~==:==:=----1~.-::::::::-.. ~.-.""""l~.""T"_-_-_-.:-_ ... _ 28 l---+--+---+--+---1-----+---+-, --+--~-1-----+-+--+---+--+--+---+--+---+--.1 +--l---+-J ..... ...1-~~!:'.'.'.::f:~·-~~I i --i...,.,,-'-i I ._...._ --------+--+---+l--+----1 1-------+~-±~~'f"=----+--I-+-+, -+-----+I --l-+---=""'*"",-+.....__-1--+--+----+-I -+---+, _____, 26 ,..,,. ............ ,...ec.. -------+--~ ,,--_-.1---,.-+--.-_+-,-.--,.,...--+"--+--------------...i.-,······ .... ··----t--+--+I, --1 24 ll'"--1-----+---·--+-c...+-,_._. "I-=---+-+-+--+-· -~--~-1---+--+'~J----1---+-1 --+--+------1 --;;,'' .,,.-· ..... --+--+----+-+-----+--+--t-....... -t'-·_.-... _.--_-+-.--~'" i -~-- 22 l:;;;,,~---+--+---t---+----l---t--+---+--+-----1---t--+--~~+----l--"''-c-l---+---+-----I 20 I ::·---+--+---+--·--+i--+---'j--+---+---4---t-------_-_ : . ..._ . ..._ --:--fl "'-=,,.+--J-----1 ' , I I • ·I "'-. -----f~ ........... --.... +---+--!+---+--+--+---+---+--+-----1--+-I -+----l·---·j"=-.:-.+--"'l.,.--1 18 .. :., 16 ~ 1---t--+---+---+---i~ --·~~,j,,...-~i.----+-+--l---l--11--l--+--l---1-----' ~ I i , ----i C. 14 l--t--+-+-+--+---t--+-+-+--+---t-"'l'""----+-a.a:~-+---t--+-+-+----1 ftl I --~-._ ~ 12 ~==:===;:-::--_'-i:..-.--.. + ... ---~-"f~~--'~~·~-.::--::·+·=-·=-······_..-. l'" .. ._------;~::;:=::::;==~1;==:===;==~~~~::=~;:~:=-~--1,· ·;: ..... t-"' -r -+--1 :l .i.---"1:c__:__+--i-:----------------·· .. ----+--+--+-+--t-----t--=,......_t------+----------.... CD I I i-.~ 10 l----t--+-----i1--+--+-----+--t--t+-+-+-----+--+--+---t-t-----'1'C......+--+---t---l -1----1--"---+--i ---1----1-----+--+---J ....... L ... _...J -1i---t---J---------f-----f-~.__:--tr-....--- 8 t--t--+--+--+---+--+--+---+--+---+--+--+---+--+---+---+--+--+--+---- ~--l--+--+---+--+---1 -~ · -· -....................... -"" ----------+--+---1--------+----·-----+---+-----f--· ..• I ' 6 t--tl--+--+--+---+----+--+---+--+--+----+--+---+--+---+---,--+---+--+------1 1---,--+---+--+--+--4-----···-·-·"-"'" ······----.-1 -+-----+-+---+-~---1---1---------- 4 t----+--+--+--+---+---,--+--+--+---+----+--+---+--+---+---,--+--+--+------1 --+--+---+-----------1-----------····" ........ I. ........•. , _______ , ___ -----+----+--+--+-------·-"-· .. i i 1' 2 t----+--+--+--+---+---,--+--+--+---+---,--+--+--+---+----+--+--+--+------1 l -----1-.. I. I ---.-f-----+---l----+--+---e--+---1-----r·--·-- 0 _ ..... _ ..... __._....,.._ ........... _ ....... --1 _ _..._,1.-_._...,...._..._ ...... _..__.._-',_-+-_""1 --I 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Footing Width (ft) -Unfactored Bearing Capacity ~ Extreme Event Capacity Resistance Factor (0.9) bearing resistance for seismic loading {Section 8.10; 2010 WSDOT GDM) --Strength Limit State -• -Seivice Limit State; 1-inch settlement ------------------------- 81-------------------------------------------I GEoENGINEERs CJ Earlll sctonce + TocllnalDIJ Spread Footing Capacity Figure 3 APPENDIX A Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING Field Explorations Subsurface conditions were explored at the site by completing seven borings (GEl-1 through GEl-7). The borings were completed by Geologic Drill Exploration, Inc. of Spokane, Washington, on September 25 and 26, 2014. The locations of the explorations were estimated in the field by measuring distances from site features through taping and pacing. The approximate exploration locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Borings The drilling contractor hand dug to a depth of 2 feet at each boring location to be clear of the grounding grid before drilling. The borings were drilled using a tracked Bobcat-mounted hollow-stem auger drill rig. The borings were continuously observed by a geotechnical engineer from our firm who examined and classified the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples, observed groundwater conditions and prepared a detailed log of each boring. Soils encountered in the borings were visually classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure A-1. A key to the exploration log symbols is also presented in Figure A-1. The logs of the borings are presented in Figures A-2 through A-8. The logs reflect our interpretation of the field conditions and the results of laboratory testing and evaluation of samples. They also indicate the depths at which the soil types or their characteristics change, although the change might actually be gradual. The borings were backfilled in accordance with Department of Ecology standards. The top 6 inches of yard rock was replaced over the completed boring to match existing yard rock. Groundwater Conditions Observations of groundwater conditions were made during drilling and are noted on the exploration logs; these observations represent a short-term condition that may not be representative of the long-term groundwater conditions at the site. Groundwater conditions observed during drilling should be considered approximate. Laboratory Testing Soil samples obtained from the field explorations were transported to our laboratory and examined to confirm or modify field classifications, as well as to evaluate index properties of the soil samples. Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing consisting of the determination of the percent fines (material passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve), moisture content and grain size distribution (sieve analysis). The tests were performed in general accordance with test methods of the ASTM International (ASTM) or other applicable procedures. Percent Passing U.S. No. 200 Sieve Selected samples were "washed" through the U.S. No. 200 mesh sieve to determine the relative percentages of coarse and fine-grained particles in the soil. The percent passing value represents the percentage by weight of the sample finer than the U.S. No. 200 sieve. These tests were conducted to verify GEoENGtNEERs_O December 5, 2016 Page A-1 me No. 0186-953·00 field descriptions and to determine the fines content for analysis purposes. The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1140, and the results are shown on the exploration logs at the respective sample depths. Moisture Content Testing Moisture content tests were completed using ASTM D 2216 for representative samples obtained from the explorations. The results of these tests are presented on the exploration logs at the depths where the samples were obtained. Sieve Analyses Sieve analyses were performed on selected samples in general accordance with ASTM D 422 to determine the sample grain size distribution. The wet sieve analysis method was used to determine the percentage of soil greater than the U.S. No. 200 mesh sieve. The results of the sieve analyses were plotted, were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), and are presented in Figures A-9 and A-10. GEOENGINEER~ December5,2016i PageA-2 Ale No. 018&953-00 SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL GRAPH LETTER DESCRIPTIONS -u CLEAN oC(~ GW WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL GRAVELS GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES AND 0 0 GRAVELLY I LITTLE OR NO FINESI bo 0 ' GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS, SOILS -0 0 GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES COARSE GRAVELS 'WITH t GM SIL TY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND MORE TI-IAN 50% -SILT MIXTURES GRAINED OF COARSE FINES SOILS FRACTION ~ RETAINED ON NO (APPRECIABLE A"'°"NT ClAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -4SIEVE Of FlNES) GC SAND-CLAY MIXTURES i.·.·.·.· .. WEll.-GRADED SANDS, i.• •••• SW CLEAN SANDS 1,,•.•.•.• •• GRAVELLY SANDS MORE THAN 50% SAND RETAINED 00 NO AND (LITTLEORNOFINES) 200 SIEVE SP POORLY-GRADED SANDS, SANDY GRAVELLY SAND SOiLS MORE THAN 50% SANDS WITH SM SIL TY SANDS, SAND -SILT OFCOAASE FINES MIXTURES FRACTION PASSING NO. 4 ~ """' (APPREC4AeLE AMOIJ/fT SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY OFFlNl:SI MIXTURES ML INORGANIC SIL TS. ROCK FLOUR, CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLAS11C!TY ~ INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO SILTS LIQUID LIMIT CL MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY FINE AND CLAYS. SANDY CLAYS, SILTY LESSTHAN50 CLAYS.LEAN CLAYS GRAINED CLAYS L SOILS ORGAIIIC SIL TS AND ORGANIC I OL SILIT CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICIIT MORETHANW% ! I ! I MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS PASSING NO 200 OROIATOMACEOUS SILIT S1E...e SOILS SILTS LIQUID LIMIT r,(j;; INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH AND GREATER THAN 50 /. // CH PLASTICIIT CLAYS I I ' I ' OH ORGANIC CLAYS AND SILTS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY -HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT. Ht.MUS, SWAMP SOILS = \IIIITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS NOTE: Multiple symbols are used to indicate borderline or dual soil classifications Sampler Symbol Descriptions [] 2.4-inch I.D. split barrel [I Standard Penetration Test (SPT) • Shelby tube ~ Piston [] Direct-Push [8J Bulk or grab Blowcount is recorded for driven samplers as the number of blows required to advance sampler 12 inches (or distance noted). See exploration log for hammer weight and drop. A "P" indicates sampler pushed using the weight of the drill rig. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SYMBOLS %F AL CA CP cs DS HA MC MD oc PM Pl pp PPM SA TX UC vs NS ss MS HS NT TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS Asphalt Concrete Cement Concrete Crushed Rock/ Quarry Spalls Topsoil/ Forest Duff/Sod Groundwater Contact Measured groundwater level in exploration, well, or plezometer Measured free product in well or piezometer Graphic Log Contact Distinct contact between soil strata or geologic units Approximate location of soil strata change within a geologic soil unit Material Description Contact Distinct contact between soil strata or geologic units Approximate location of soil strata change within a geologic soil unit Laboratory/ Field Tests Percent fines Atterberg limits Chemical analysis Laboratory compaction test Consolidation test Direct shear Hydrometer analysis Moisture content Moisture content and dry density Organic content Permeability or hydraulic conductivity Plasticity index Pocket penetrometer Parts per million Sieve analysis Triaxial compression Unconfined compression Vane shear Sheen Classification No Visible Sheen Slight Sheen Moderate Sheen Heavy Sheen Not Tested NOTE: The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text and the logs of explorations for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. Descriptions on the logs apply only at the specific exploration locations and at the time the explorations were made; they are not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times. KEY TO EXPLORATION LOGS GEOENGINEERS CJ FIGUREA-1 filill1 End I Total 31.5 I logged By DML I Driller Geologic Drill I Drilling Hollow-stem Auger Drilled 9/25/2014 9/25/2014 Depth {ft) Checked By CEW Method Surface Elevation (ft) 438 Hammer Rope & Cathead Drilling Mini Track Rig Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs)/ 30 (in) Drop Equipment Easting (X) System ~CQ!mdwate:c Northing (Y) Datum Depth lo Pare Measumd -E11wation /ft\ Noles: None Observed FIELD DATA I '2 i C = E ~ MATERIAL I ~ • • 0 ~ REMARKS C ~ ~ .. ~ ~ • DESCRIPTION [ [ 0 • ~ ~ 0 0 • ~ Ii ~ e-~ t > j " r~ o C C ~ ~ 8 f ~ ~ ~i ;~ ill t'l la • ~ ;: ~ "-" co 0: " <!JU ~o c:o a p ' GP 3/4-inch angular gravel SM Light brown silty fine to coarse sand with gra'A::I Excavated to 2 feet using hand tcds {loose, moist) (fill) -" a - 1 · -SP-SM ~-----------------~ _,.,• 18 " ._ Br0v.-T1 fine to medium sand with silt, organics r " SM · \ ~nd occasional gravel {loose, moisl) (fill) Roogh drilling .'·. ·-.·-sP-sM-h BrO'Ml silty fine to medium sand with ; \ occasional organics (dense, moist) (glacial / ~ ~--------------~ -gM-jl Light gray brown fine to medium sand with silt r -5-16 46 2 .-\ _(dense,moist) __________ /_ BrO\Ml silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (dense, moist) ·.-SM----------------------" r Gray brown silty fine to medium sand with - occasional gravel (very dense, moist) _fl 18 58 a 8 27 SA " a " .-SM-~-------------------Gray brown silty fine to medium sand with 10-18 57 4 f-occasional gravel {very dense, moist) - " I ,...J,,,t, " a " ' 15- ] 12 53 5 f-- _,.-f' " Beoomes dense a 21)-18 49 ''F f--10 15 a " C Note: See Figure A-1 for e>:p1anation of symbols. Log of Boring GEl-1 GEoENGINEERS CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure A-2 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 1 of 2 FIELD DATA ~ • I 0. C E MATERIAL ,1', I • -. ~ 0 REMARKS ~ 0 ~ j 0 ~ ii: l C ~ ~ DESCRIPTION I ~ u u 0 " • ~ Ii ~ le "'~ ·a; ~ > j :c §-"iii > 15. ~ 0 ~ ~ e~ i ~ u ~ •c • • • 0 0 • co w 0 "' in u f-"' C)() u u::u .l" .. SP-SM Brown fine to medium sand with silt (very dense, moist) (advance outwash) .. 25-18 58 7 I f-- f- 1 ·· a J<'" .. I . .. . ·: 30-18 52 • %F f--10 11 .. .. ' ' Note: See Figure A-1 for el<planation of symbols. Log of Boring GEl-1 (continued) GEOENGINEERS CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure A-2 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet2 of2 = .E..o.d. I Total 31.5 I Logged By DML J Driller Geologic Drill Drilling Drilled 9/2512014 9/25/2014 Depth (ft) Checked By CEW Method Hollow-stem Auger Surface Elevation {ft) 438 Hammer Rope & Cathead Drilling Mini Track Rig Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs)/ 30 (in) Drop Equipment Easting (X) System GCQ11Dd!6!iltii!r Northing (Y) Datum Depth to ow, Maas11rAd ""'1or.JlU Elmtion (ft) Notes: None Observed FIELD DATA • l "2 ... I, C ! '=-~ • 8' 0 MATERIAL "ll " ~ REMARKS C 1 > ~ • DESCRIPTION 'j: l ~ • 0 m ~ u u .-~ • > ~ " ~ 5 i: C • E. ~ 0 ~ ; 0 ~ns -· .i ~ > • ! u ,; ~ em -~§ • m w 0 0: 1ii u ;: "' "'[j ~u ~u 0 p ' GP 3/4-inch angular gra'w'el SM Light brown silty fine to coarse sand 'Mth gravel Excavated to 2 feet using hand tods --(loose, moist) (fill) SM Brown silty fine to medium sand with _,.," ~ 17 80 1 occasional gravel (very dense, moist) (glacial till) ·:-SM--Brown silty-fine to fllediu"m 5and withgiiwl --- s-18 76 , -(very dense, moist) -6 "' SA -- - µ.-l' - SM Brown silty fine to medium sand (very dense, moist) (advance outwash) a 10-18 S2 a --11 18 %F . a . 1µ...P · 1-sP-sM -Brown fine to medium sand with silt and --- ··1·: occasional gravel (wry dense, moist) 'a . 15-12 90/12" ' -- a . e - µ.i' · ~-1-sP-sM 1-Brown fine to medium sand 'Nith silt (very - dense, moist) a 20-18 S3 5 ~ - a . : .. - Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. Log of Boring GEl-2 GEOENGINEERS CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure A-3 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 1 of2 FIELD DATA ~ I t I C E E MATERIAL ~ ~ • ro .. ~ 0 REMARKS ~ 0 0 > 0 1ii l l C ~ ~ z • ~ DESCRIPTION 0 ,g ~ ~ " " " • ~ ·~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > C E~ "' §-"iii > 0. 0 • • r,; ~ ~ ~~ • 2 " 0 ~ s 2~ • • ro • co w 0 E "' ro u "'>-" "' "'() u u: u _,.," 25-18 39 6 -: :->. -Becomes light brown and dense - - --- _,.,• -/:.'. -gp--------------------Brown fine to medium sand (medium dense, moist) -.. · -- >-30-18 12 z %F --7 5 - ' ' Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. Log of Boring GEl-2 (continued) GEOENGINEERS CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure A-3 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet2 of2 .§!fill &m'. I Total 21.5 I Logged By DML / Driller Geolcgic Drill Drilling Hollow-stem Auger Drilled 9/2512014 9/25/2014 Depth (ft) Checked By CEW Method Surface Elevation (ft) 438 Hammer Rope & Cathead Drilling Mini Track Rig Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs)/ 30 (in) Drop Equipment Easting {X) System Qccuos:twatac Northing (Y) Datum Depth to Pata MA8Sl1Cfld WJi1oLJlll flAvallon /ft\ Notes: None Observed FIELD DATA I • ;[ -a I, C E .. 8' 0 MATERIAL I u • ~ REMARKS 0 .. > 'i-: ;,: C ~ • ~ DESCRIPTION ~ • ,g ~ ~ 0 0 ~i I i ~ ~ > j I "' r~ " > a 8 ~ •• • ~ ~ 13 . " • • -" C 0 m 0 Q'. 0 "' "'" u::u 0 ' GP 3/4-inch gravel SM Light brown silty fine to coarse sand with gravel Excavated to 2 feet using hand tools a . a (loose, moist) (fill) - SM Gray brown wilh oxidation staining silty fine to µ.~" 18 14 1 medium sand with occasional gravel 13 MC (medium dense, moist) {glacial till) ._f--gM--f--------------------Brown siltyfine to medium sand (medium ,-18 28 , r dense, moist) -12 26 SA a . a - · .f-SM-f-------------------Brown silty fine to medium sand with gravel µ.+ 18 31 , (dense, moist) 8 16 -%F r - SP-SM Brown fine to medium sand with silt and a 10-16 50 4 f--occasional gravel (dense to very dense, - moist) (advance outwash) a -a - µ.<t' c - 15-18 52 5 r - --- µ.f> c -1 .... - 20-18 25 6 f-Becomes medium dense - .. a -I .· r - Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. Log of Boring GEl-3 GEoENGINEERS CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure A-4 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 1 of 1 ~ Elli:1 I Total 31.5 I Logged By DML I Driller Geologic Drill Drilling Hollow-stem Auger Drilled 9/2512014 9/25/2014 Depth (ft) Checked By CEW Method Surface Elevation (ft) 438 Hammer Rope & Cathead Drilling Mini Track Rig Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs)/ 30 (in) Drop Equipment Easting {X) System ~rQ11odwatac Northing (Y) Datum Depth to Pate MMSI l[fld -EIAYftliOD lftJ Notes: None Observed FIELD DATA 1? c i I, C ,g I ~ ~ " ~ a MATERIAL !l a 15 REMARKS C ~ 0 > ~ DESCRIPTION 'ii l I • u u Q " • ~ ~ e-;; ~ > " ~ :2 g-·oo B~ c ~ li ~ 0 I ~ ~ .!~ i u ~ 2~ -6~ • • o iil 0 "' u ;;: "' "'() ~u ~u 0 ' GP 314-inch grawl SM Light brown siltyfine to coarse sand with gra'A:!I Exca~ted to 2 feet using hand tools . (loose, moist) (fill) . :f-s~r ~------------------Brown silty fine to medium sand with µ.'" 17 9 1 occasional gravel (loose, moist) (fill) Lacks gravel, becomes light brown a 5-16 6 2 r-With oxidation staining - SP-SM Light brown fine to medium sand with silt and µ.'" 16 29 3 occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) .· (advance outwash) e 10-16 36 • ·:f----SM-· r-Brown silty fine to medium sand with --13 19 SA occasional gravel (dense, moist) .·-~·-:rsP-SM-r------------------Gray brown fine to medium sand with silt -. (dense, moist) I ~<f' 16 40 5 ' '":""-~._'-sP-sM 1--Gray brown fine to medium sand with silt and · -. -15-18 34 6 f-occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) - -. a . _,.,f> -. a . 20-18 59 7 f- Becomes very dense - -. Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. Log of Boring GEl-4 GeoENGINEERS CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure A-5 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 1 of2 FIELD DATA " • c 0. I, C ~ E MATERIAL ~ " • w 3 0 REMARKS ~ I ~ 3 ~ Cji ;,: C ~ ~ ~ a a DESCRIPTION a " • ~ e-.. ~ ';; ~ > ~ I '& c.·-,c > Q. e 0 ! ~ ~ ~ :§* •c • • ~ ~ ~ Oo Co w C, QC ,a u " coo :>o ii:(.) L>.'" C 25-18 34 • MC ~ -Lacks gravel, becomes dense 9 C . f-. L>.'" C . f-. 3/J-9 1-With occasional gravel, becomes very dense -17 59 C . f-. ~ ~ ;, ~ 0 •' s 0 I ~ 0 ~ I ! i I a I i 2 u 2 • I Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. ~ u Log of Boring GEl-4 (continued) ~ ~ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements I GEOENGINEERS CJ 0 Project Location: Renton, Washington I Figure A-5 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 2 of2 = .E.o.d I Total 31.5 I Logged By DML I Driller Geologic Drill I Drilling Hollow-stem Auger Drilled 9/26/2014 9/26/2014 Depth (ft) Checked By CEW Method Surface Elevation {ft) 443 Hammer Rope & Cathead Drilling Mini Track Rig Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs) 130 (in) Drop Equipment Easting {X) System Gr21mQwl;!~[ Northing (Y) Datum Depth ta Pate Mws11rnct -EIA\/atlPO /ft) Notes: None Observed FIELD DATA I [ i I, C "" ~ .,, 8' 0 MATERIAL REMARKS ~ 8 .. ~ ~ iii [ C ,1!. ~ ~ ~ 0 DESCRIPTION 0 .,, • "' ~ ~ 0 ~ •-I ~ > I l '§_ o.--.a~ C ~ 0 ~ e i -~ a 0 " ~ j§ •c • • .s a w 0 :;; "' 0 3: <!J <!JU ~u a TS 6 inches topsoil/root zone •:•:•:• SM Brown silty fine to medium sand with -occasional gravel and trace organics (loose, . moist) e - µ,'o 18 17 1A -1B SM Brown with oxidation staining silty fine to medium sand (medium dense, moist) (fill) - :.1-St-r -------------------Gray silty fine to medium sand with occasional e ,-1B 15 2 -gravel (medium dense, moist) (fill) - -- -SM Gray brown silty fine to medium sand with W>'~ 1B 30 , -SA occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) a 15 (glacial till) - --- ·: __ -SM--Gray brown silty fine to medium sand (medium · - 10-1B 2B 4 -dense, moist) - - . - '...J>."'"" .. -SM--------------------Light gray brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (dense, moist) ' . 15-1-18 42 • ~ -14 MC . _,.,t, . ' -. 20-18 63 6 ~ - a Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols . . ~ Log of Boring GEl-5 ~ GEoENGINEERs CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements ! Project Location: Renton, Washington i Figure A-6 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 1 of2 FIELD DATA " c i C ~ E MATERIAL ~ ! • -,; 2' 0 REMARKS "ll 15 0 > ~ t t C ~ ~ DESCRIPTION ,g ~ • u 0 " • I I rn ~ C. !E ~ ~ > ~ C 2 " ~ C ~ 0 ~ e ~ ~~ > 15. u ! • • El • 0 0 ~ 0 ·"= 0 uj Cl C a: ffi 0 ~ " "cJ u ~u µ,'>' . SP-SM Gray brown fine to medium sand with silt and occasional gravel (very dense, moist) ( advance outwash) . " 25-I I--7 11 18 67 %F r> . . _,.," - -. 30-' --18 51 -- ' 2 o, • I ~ 0 a 2 0 i : i • i ' I • I u I Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. ~ u ~ Log of Boring GEl-5 (continued) ~ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements i GeoENGINEERS Q 0 Project Location: Renton, Washington I Figure A-6 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 2 of2 .filslt1 £!lQ. I Total 16.5 I Logged By DML I Driller Geologic Drill Dril!ing Hollow-stem Auger Drilled 9/26/2014 9/26/2014 Depth (ft) Checked By CEW Method Surface Elevation (ft) 440 Hammer Rope & Cathead Drilling Mini Track Rig Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs) 130 (in) Drop Equipment Easting (X) System G[Q!m~tfl:r Northing (Y) Datum Depth to Pate Meam ,red ll'lUor.Jlll Flmtion rm Notes: None Observed FIELD DATA I c i I, C ~ E MATERIAL I • "ijJ _§' 0 REMARKS C "!l 0 • ~ ~ DESCRIPTION " t 0 • 0 ] ~ 0 0 e::-~ ';ii ~ 'al ~ ~ " j :c o.--0 C E • 0. a• ~i -~ > a 0 ~ e~ • 2 0 ~ o C • • 0 Co [ij 0 .s O'. <D 0 "' "'() ~u u::: () 0 :::::;: TS 6 inches topsoil/root zone SM Brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel and trace organics (loose, moist) a . 16 27 1 SM Brown with oxidation staining silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel and occasional organics (medium dense, dry) (glacial till) . ~--1-------------------- 1->~" . SM Brown silty fine to medium sand with s-16 25 ' ~ occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) - a . ·.: :·._r-sP.sM · r------------------Brown fine to medium sand with silt and gravel 16 32 J MC I (dense, moist) 7 a . a . µ.+ +--3M-1--Gray brown silty fine medium sand with · - 10-14 51 ' ~ occaional gravel (very dense, moist) - a -a . ' SP-SM Gray brown fine to medium sand with silt and occasional gravel (very dense, moist) ' (advance outwash) . w,.'l-'=' 15-18 78 5 ~ - - Note: See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbols. Log of Boring GEl-6 GEOENGINEERS CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements Project Location: Renton, Washington Figure A-7 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 1 of 1 filorl &D..d. I Total 16.5 I Logged By DML I . . I Drilling Hollow-stem Auger Drilled 9/26/2014 9/26/2014 Depth (ft) Checked By CEW Driller Geologic Dnll Method Surface Elevation {ft) 443 Hammer Rope & Cathead Drilling Mini Track Rig Vertical Datum Data 140 (lbs)/ 30 (in) Drop Equipment Easting (X) System GrQ!JQQw'1~r Northing (Y) Datum Depth to Date MMSIJred -flevalion Wl Notes: None Observed FIELD DATA j;; • c " I, ~ ~ E • .3 a MATERIAL ! ~ • ~ REMARKS i ~ ~ ? l C i ~ 0 DESCRIPTION 0 " ~ ~ .s g-~ •-~ ~ ~ j ~ 0 C C • a ~ ~ ~ ~j I! ~ 2s f IP. ~ e~ ill a; u CJ CJ 13 ~u 0 ::::::: TS 6 inches topsoil/root zone SM Brown silty fine ta medium sand with occasional gravel and trace organics (loose, moist) . - LJ> 13 13 1 SM Light brown silty fine to medium sand with -e occasional gravel (medium dense, dry) (fill) - - SM Light brown silty fine to medium sand with 5-18 43 2 >-gravel (medium dense, dry to moist) {glacial -5 15 %F till) - .,.~~ -SP-SM Brown fine to medium sand with silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) -(advance outwash) . 10-3 -18 28 - -. L.,.eP - '" . ~. ..._sP..sM -Bro1Nl"I fine to medium sand with silt (dense, -- moist) 15-4 --18 46 -. . · .. i ' i I ~ ~ ~ 0 z ~ Note: See Figure A-1 for e:,,:planation of symbols. ~ a u ~ Log of Boring GEl-7 ~ GeoENGINEERS CJ Project: PSE Talbot Substation Improvements j Project Location: Renton, Washington j Figure A-8 Project Number: 0186-953-00 Sheet 1 of 1 0186-953-00 SAS: SAS 10-10-2014 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE G'l 3"' 1.5" 314"' 3/8'" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 m 100 ,; 0 I ~ ...... I m 90 " ·~ ..., _LL ' z I "' ,; Ci\ 80 ' 1--0 --...:: -f--i ..,.. r--,, z I ' -(9 ,, -... ...._ ......... m w 70 ' 11 -..... m s: i ::a I ,; >-60 I I ~ CD f ' \ ' (9 I ' i' z 50 -~-'-- (/) f " . I.. ' r----~ (/) 40 ' i., <{ i f ,~ Cl. I f--I f " f I'\~ z 30 - f f ... I w I (.) Ii f f ' I c:: 20 '' w ; i f f '' ' Cl. -' 10 Ii i ! !I? 0 , I I m 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 < m "T1 )> GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS z i5 )> C ~ ;:c !BOULDERS I I m CJ) GRAVEL SAND )> iii COBBLES I I SILT OR CLAY ' ;:c COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE (0 m CJ) C ~ CJ) EXPLORATION DEPTH SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL NUMBER (ft) • GEl-1 7% Silty fine to medium sand with gravel (SM) D GEl-2 5 Silty fine to medium sand with gravel (SM) % GEl-3 5 Silty fine to medium sand (SM) GEl-4 10 Silty fine to medium sand (SM) 0186-953-00 SAS: SAS 10-10-2014 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE G) r 1.5" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #60 #100 #200 m 100 . 0 """"' -Ii " m 90 ---z ,. ~ I~ .... i 80 ' -f- J J '-z I (9 ' ' m 70 " I w J " i' m s: :,:, I! " I! " >-60 ~ Ill q ,, (9 50 il ~ z I J (J) ,, ~ 40 J ! ' a.. i I J f-,, ' \ z 30 I --r _, ' ' w J () J ' - a::: 20 ' w ! J ~ I a.. I 10 I i I I ' 0 ' i !:!! m 1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 < m ..., )> GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS Gi z )> C ~ ;o !BOULDERS I m CJ) GRAVEL SAND )> iii COBBLES I I SILT OR CLAY • ;o COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FJNE -0 m CJ) C r-~ CJ) EXPLORATION DEPTH SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL NUMBER /ft\ • GEl-5 7\; Silty fine to medium sand (SM) APPENDIX B Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use APPENDIXB REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE' This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report. Geotechnlcal Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons and Projects This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Puget Sound Energy and their authorized agents. This report may be made available to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. This report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, a geotechnical or geologic study conducted for a civil engineer or architect may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer or architect that are involved in the same project. Because each geotechnical or geologic study is unique, each geotechnical engineering or geologic report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. Our report is prepared for the exclusive use of our Client. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. This is to provide our firm with reasonable protection against open-ended liability claims by third parties with which there would otherwise be no contractual limits to their actions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with our Agreement with the Client and generally accepted geotechnical practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. This report should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. A Geotechnlcal Engineering or Geologic Report Is Based on a Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors This report has been prepared for the proposed improvements to the Talbot Substation located in Renton, Washington. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project-specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on this report if it was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. 1 Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org. GEoENGINEER~ December 5, 2016 Page B-1 File No. 0186-953·00 For example, changes that can affect the applicability of this report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure; • elevation, configuration, location, orientation or weight of the proposed structure; • composition of the design team; or • project ownership. If important changes are made after the date of this report, GeoEngineers should be given the opportunity to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation, as appropriate. Subsurface Conditions Can Change This geotechnical or geologic report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time, by man made events such as construction on or adjacent to the site, or by natural events such as floods, earthquakes, slope instability or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers before applying a report to determine if it remains applicable. Most Geotechnical and Geologic Findings Are Professional Opinions Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Geotechnlcal Engineering Report Recommendations Are Not Final Do not over-rely on the preliminary construction recommendations included in this report. These recommendations are not final, because they were developed principally from GeoEngineers' professional judgment and opinion. GeoEngineers' recommendations can be finalized only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. GeoEngineers cannot assume responsibility or liability for this report's recommendations if we do not perform construction observation. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by GeoEngineers should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork activities are completed in accordance with our recommendations. Retaining GeoEngineers for construction observation for this project is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. GEOENGINEER~ December 5, 2016, Page B·2 Flle No. 0186.953-00 A Geotechnical Engineering or Geologic Report Could Be Subject to Misinterpretation Misinterpretation of this report by other design team members can result in costly problems. You could lower that risk by having GeoEngineers confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain GeoEngineers to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering or geologic report. Reduce that risk by having GeoEngineers participate in pre-bid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. Do Not Redraw the Exploration Logs Geotechnical engineers and geologists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering or geologic report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotechnical engineering or geologic report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with GeoEngineers and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A pre-bid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might an owner be in a position to give contractors the best information available, while requiring them to at least share the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Further, a contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in your project budget and schedule. Contractors Are Responsible for Site Safety on Their Own Construction Projects Our geotechnical recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's procedures, methods, schedule or management of the work site. The contractor is solely responsible for job site safety and for managing construction operations to minimize risks to on-site personnel and to adjacent properties. Read These Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering or geology) are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations" provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" apply to your project or site. Geotechnical, Geologic and Environmental Reports Should Not Be Interchanged The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or GEOENGINEER~ December 5, 2016 i Page 8-3 File No. 0186-953-00 recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. Biological Pollutants GeoEngineers' Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation, detection, prevention or assessment of the presence of Biological Pollutants. Accordingly, this report does not include any interpretations, recommendations, findings, or conclusions regarding the detecting, assessing, preventing or abating of Biological Pollutants and no conclusions or inferences should be drawn regarding Biological Pollutants, as they may relate to this project. The term "Biological Pollutants" includes, but is not limited to, molds, fungi, spores, bacteria, and viruses, and/or any of their byproducts. If Client desires these specialized services, they should be obtained from a consultant who offers services in this specialized field. GEOENGINEER.g December 5, 2016 Page B-4 file No. 0186-953·00 ... SUBDIVISION Guarantee/Certificate Number: Issued By: @CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 0023638-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES David Evans & Associates, Inc. herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Chicago Title Insurance Company By Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2300 Seattle, WA 98104 Countersigned By: Attest: Authorized Officer or Agent Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 1 President Secretary Printed: 09.24.14@ 06:46AM WA-CT -F N SE-02150 .622476-S P S-1-14-0023638-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0023638-06 Liability $1,000.00 ISSUING OFFICE: Title Officer: Commercial / Unit 6 Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2300 Seattle, WA 98104 Main Phone: (206)628-5610 Email: CTISeaTitleUnit6""ctt.com SCHEDULE A Premium $350.00 Effective Date: September 16, 2014 at 08:00AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: Tax $33.25 That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington corporation, successor in interest to Puget Sound Power & Light Company which acquired title as Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Company subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 2 Printed: 09.24.14@ 06:46AM WA-CT -F NSE-02150 .6224 76-S PS-1-14-0023638-06 Parcel A: EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description The Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; Except that portion thereof lying Northerly of the Bonneville Power Administration easement as established by instrument recorded under recording no. 3560496 and Southerly of the Puget Sound Power & Light Company (now Puget Sound Energy, Inc.) 50 foot wide lntermountain Power Line No. 2 right of way; and Except that portion thereof lying within the Puget Sound Power & Light Company (now Puget Sound Energy, Inc.) 200 foot wide Shuffleton No. 1 & 2 right of way. Parcel B: That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, lying Westerly of the 66 foot wide City of Seattle Cedar River pipeline right of way as established pursuant to decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 24650; Also, That portion of said subdivision lying Northerly of the Southerly line of the Bonneville Power Administration easement as established by instrument recorded under recording no. 3560496 and Easterly of the 66 foot wide City of Seattle Cedar River pipeline right of way as established pursuant to decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 24650. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 3 Printed: 09.24.14@ 06:46AM WA-CT -FN SE-02150. 6224 76-SPS-1-14-0023636-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0023638-06 SCHEDULE B SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as condemned in: Court: Case No.: In favor of: Purpose: Affects: King County Superior Court 24650 City of Seattle Pipe line right of way Portion of said premises and other property lying within a strip of land 66 feet in width 2. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Reconstruction Finance Corporation Transmission line and appurtenances April 18, 1946 3560496 Portions of said premises and other property lying within a strip of land 200 feet in width The interest of Reconstruction Finance Corporation under said easement was conveyed/assigned to The City of Seattle by deed recorded under recording no. 3664560. 3. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: United States of America One or more electric power transmission lines and appurtenances July 5, 1960 5178076 Portion of Parcel Bas described in document 4. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: width City of Seattle, a municipal corporation Transmission line September 26, 1961 5333805 A Southerly portion of said premises and other property lying within a strip of land 100 feet in 5. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission line and appurtenances November 10, 1964 5809795 A Southerly portion of Parcel Bas described in document Note: Said easement appears to contain an erroneous legal description. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page4 Printed: 09.24.14@ 06:46AM WA-CT-F N SE-02150 .6224 76-SP S-1-14-0023638-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0023638-06 SCHEDULE B (continued) 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Recording Date: Construction, maintenance and operation of a petroleum pipe line October 26, 1973 Recording No.: 7310260495 Affects: document Portion of Parcel A lying within a strip of land 10 feet in width as described and delineated in Said easement was modified by amendment thereto recorded under recording no. 7410310307. 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Constnuclion, maintenance and operation of a petroleum pipe line Recording Date: October 26, 1973 Recording No.: 7310260496 Affects: Portion of said premises lying within a strip of land 10 feet in width as described and delineated in document 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as disclosed by the King County Assessor's map: In favor of: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Purpose: Transmission line(s) -Beverly No. 1 and lntermountain Power Line No. 2 Affects: Northerly portions of Parcels A and B lying within strip(s) of land having 150 feet in total width, as delineated 9. Liquid Petroleum Products Pipe Line Permit Agreement Between: And: Recording Date: Recording No.: The City of Seattle, a municipal corporation Olympic Pipe Line Company, a Delaware corporation February 14, 1975 7502140608 10. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 11. Special taxes for surface water management and/or other special charges: 1st half delinquent May 1st, 2nd half delinquent November 1st: Year: Amount billed: Amount paid: Amount due: Tax Account Number: Levy code: Affects: 2014 12.70 12.70 0.00 202305-9003-02 2100 Parcel A The general real estate taxes are assessed as operating property under a master tax account. We are unable at this time to access this master tax account information. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 5 Printed: 09.24.14@ 06:46AM WA-CT-F NSE-02150 .6224 76-SP S-1-14-0023638-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) • GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0023638-06 12. Special taxes for surface water management and/or other special charges: 1st half delinquent May 1st, 2nd half delinquent November 1st: Year: Amount billed: Amount paid: Amount due: Tax Account Number: Levy code: Affects: 2014 9.13 9.13 0.00 202305-9066-06 2100 Parcel B The general real estate taxes are assessed as operating property under a master tax account. We are unable at this time to access this master tax account information. 13. Mortgage, upon and subject to all of the provisions therein contained, to secure the payment of a bond issue of $12,501,000.00: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: Volume: June 2, 1924 June 28, 1924 1887814 894 of Mortgages, Page 338 Mortgagor: Mortgagee: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Massachusetts corporation Old Colony Trust Company, a Massachusetts corporation of Boston Said mortgage covers all real and personal property, rights, privileges, easements, licenses and franchises and all other property of every nature whatsoever owned or hereafter acquired by first party AND mortgages supplemental thereto. 14. Trust Deed, upon and subject to all of the provisions therein contained, to secure payment of an issue of bonds in the sum of $36,500,000.00: Dated: December 1, 1942 Recorded: April 12, 1943 Recording No.: 3302705 Volume: 1857 of Mortgages, Page 73 Mortgagor: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Massachusetts corporation Mortgagee: Seattle First National Bank of Seattle, as Co-Trustee, and Old Colony Trust Company, a Massachusetts corporation of Boston, as Trustee Note: Said Trust Deed covers certain property, and any other property thereafter acquired that shall become subject to the original mortgage or deed of trust and mortgages supplemental thereto. Assigned to: Recording No.: Old Colony Trust Company 3518774 15. Any unrecorded leaseholds, right of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the Land and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the terms. 16. Question of legal access. There does not appear to be any recorded easement for ingress and egress from said premises to a public road. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 6 Printed: 09.24.14@ 06:46AM WA-CT -F NSE-02150 .6224 76-S PS-1-14-0023638-06 • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0023638-06 SCHEDULE B (continued) 17. Your application for title insurance was placed by reference to only a street address or tax identification number. Based on our records, we believe that the legal description in this report covers the parcel(s) of Land that you requested. If the legal description is incorrect, the seller/borrower must notify the Company and/or the settlement company in order to prevent errors and to be certain that the correct parcel(s) of Land will appear on any documents to be recorded in connection with this transaction and on the policy of title insurance. Note: FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per Amended RCW 65.04.045. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document: Portions of the South half of the Northeast quarter of Section 20-23-5. Tax Account No.: 202305-9003-02 and 202305-9066-06 Note: Any map furnished with this Guarantee/Certificate is for convenience in locating the land indicated herein with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance thereon. END OF SCHEDULE 8 Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Page 7 Printed: 09.24.14@ 06:46AM WA-CT -FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-1-14-0023638-06 ... DEPARTMENT OF t IMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -------•,_.Ren ton® AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way. Renton. WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 I www.rentonwa.gov STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) DEC O 6 2016 ..----,--- -----''"'--fa-'-~-'--F--'-r _ ___.gt'--'----'--c-'-m'----=6.--=&.'---'"/L=.L/"--./\J"---------------· being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: rt" 1.0nthe~7~ __ daycl_n~--=~-~~~·~£--~ . I ';}1qfl C'.. • 20~, -t" installed information ;? y,,c) sign(s) on the property located S. Pv;,;2::1--U, "..-c for the following project: public at ~//,,f 41/ 5'°vb5-h,.,-/1,n _;:;,_t'V'<-Afs Project Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 8 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code and the City's "Public Information Signs Installation" handout package. SUBSCRIBED-\~~~ before me is ~ day of leuzm ber , 20-10_. ~#.;;..:;!C<t,;'', ffll~~~ '\ ~ &~{CM j 1""'~ 5 \ NOTARY Pu1:uc in and for the State of Washington, ~ '· $ 'I> ~ ; residing at ~rp,z,4 hJ, ?'z!B>=2. ~ ~-.. ~: ~ '--""' s -~, d'~J;.:..,,i: ~~ _.: ,,, ~1'; ,ft.,.. . ,,,, "I: Of ,• 11,\'""''''" My commission expires on _(r;---'-/_Jr_C__:/_l_t ____ _ 7 \ RECEIPT EG00062637 $ CITY OF 0. Renton~ 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 """····· ""''"'"''''''''' ••••.• ,,,,--«·· -······«:-cc Transaction Date: December 06, 2016 BILLING CONTACT Jeff McMeekin Puget Sound Energy PO Box 97034 MIS PSE-09N Bellevue, WA 980099734 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA16-000922 PLAN -Environmental Review Printed On: December 20, 2016 Prepared By: Angelea Weihs TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment PAYMENT METHOD SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,000.00 $5,150.00 $5,150.00 Page 1 of 1