Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 01PARTIES OF RECORD FRED MEYER FUELING STATION Robert McNeill, Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue S Kent, WA 98032 tel: (425) 251-6222 eml: bmcneill@barghausen.com (applicant / contact) LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF James Coombes, RE Entitlements Manager Fred Meyer Stores, Inc 3800 SE 22nd Avenue Portland, OR 97202 tel: (503) 797-5617 eml: james.coombes@fredmeyer.com (owner) Louis Scannell Benson Dairy Queen 17824 108th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 (party of record) Jpdated; 07/11/08 (Page 1 of 1) I r ® yg I r^ f � _ 4 r I I V •� P II I I a Ali m I! Z Pw.rwrr�.yr�� � � � - ;Ik �,I I t, � •ilYfY�iYNUeila � al��fa � `' m — -- pgpg9BB MW AVE BE. a XA� 000a 000®� o 000 00 000cc0000000 3 a 3 M I T I ) INj ?.``f n N�qaY •B49 � �A-Oaz �� Q T STp6■r Z m m 0brri p �69 pd i 1 �• • i i� _ 1 } q f ti _ j 7 I I , :k 1,41 - MP CD ,d I„ ' 1 illsAs S - r %Xh An 5E . F:F toy 02 r. A "n am am e E. Ns K {,s,� ➢gym �0,` yam I ���"" cM� (10��E ��TK i EAST i 10fflh STREET PAM8G LOT_ RIGHT ELEVATION,'SOUTH o2 KK)SIK GRAPHICS �- . /2— '-0' T rredMeyer (,)CANOPY GRAPHICS sckr 1/7- !'-C' i� S ErTIONATCANOPY 6 ION SUIRS �EL mmm C-� CANOPY PRICE SIGN GRAPHICS a SCAE. /2-: 1 -6- A*dAdbyso STORE 031 RENTON 'i l 1W AV a THFKROGER COMPANY AND FRED MEYER STORES ING awo se am Awe 0 oliAt, FRED MEYER FUELING FACILITY ADDITION PRE -APPLICATION SET D5 is 08 EXTERIOR ELEVATI07 AND SIGNAGE A2 1 - t S, S. A ;a ....... • .a ' .. .Y��+W , AwA}JJ�Y wK i�/ . y ••#a u.Y ri,o—a.". ,: i...nw.++i[l.,i w •..a e-> ...r •.^• •+ree `i�•,'r.ra+. F-- .,...., .sr A s n . 17f 62.t E :a iz 41 Gx"ems ^ , :tiaJaAE:Fx THE 4fROGER COMPANY r NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP 13193 �a wr w.reai m x N,,,'.:r 1 FRED MEYER STORES INC. FRED MEYER Ius,�rr rvu NORTH BENSON STORE #031 3800 SE 22ND AVENUE RENTON, WASHINGTON PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 K! 11, 0 Y y Y }} oil a 108th AVE. SE. S.S.H. NO. 5—C (515) q a e ppprr QQ22 �p �� a����� fie➢ yy �o� � � i� !�' ] ..p��or,��.gor.,�,.� �b 1erl scf ki. .a:.K Qau arvaw>•w . �. . e�b ri ,1 � P ,P f 1 vd! `f1 S! .YP •, L4 y� tk L F. V. 1TIF Ii '.4.4 �I�l ^— �Cm a s h' ;i o a Z z n M Z Oct o 4�: :] n cn zoo Z I o n° DiTl Z MC �n -� NP ymcn �z y9Eif9o�a�m o I m a*.° cmA i'm�RiI*� ft: F r m F2 �mPO �pl r c,N�InTm w .. i],1,i t , s . � i]r,:.Y�n n... • . n..�..irw m. i..n. i x : a. [5 x., x n r>>, s]e a., rr.. 5... a. i.r.r..i P i 5 ¢Y..i AVEVM SE "a M z n z 0 CO z M r z �Y CY 0 8689 O d e O 8 G 9 " . ire Ul i 9 � • � Fill y u -< .Z1 Cn D T �° � y�•" ''ad9 _ inn z of r!Q� <rnin S��g�a oQy�mK_,o U. K' {;ri Ai p� n1 1 f-a DW AVE BE I-. M . s-- fern 0 m K 0 r 0 z D z 0 m m 0 co 0 z 0 0 z 0 r —4 r n z H_ ° o a � lim I I -Pcm � age p 4� a p ]{ Trn0 1l 1, m T o0 sp��na N pp am �zo`'�p0�iPx^' A� Z� _ A �CI7 0Gl �iA s gtx ¢g Fn ?o 'mvAiRS gg �'"tea ~ V 0p ons $$ ss '� s mo n $ y3 q Cjl yN sd}��� m$ m 4 fir kfP m o�D �m � i �c C, a zo I n �1"� lE 0p ons $$ ss '� s mo n $ y3 q Cjl yN sd}��� m$ m 4 fir kfP m o�D �m � i �c C, a zo I n �1"� lE iR rI 9 p� m � 6 ; I �E;� � s � � �a asg ,'• �� � � �# — I f i f 8g + � 6�� v _ , � � � � �� � •wow Lvcn I Zfft �i�G. g �� s� �� � :� � � � � ... -. _�. - - �.._ - .- to }�•. •,�R :z �� ; FRRF3R i r�si��re,awrll? CD z r� co oti~Tr3rrr1I � m 0 ?� Z n • o xsf�t #f mig R E;� 13E"a � �� g� € E �� .; .p � ' ; j gj'''9 ,.! yy5§�� s fe iA � r �" Y � F"�� _� �• FB � ��' i� 7� F, B^C 2 t[ s; � aF W . RUC�_ P�INI HI `; �z1� �gg� p A �E lit I � w �a a zjA 594 0 4 a - i i V �' r z ~� PR y ❑ r 1 gum g v Q Fo Fix PQ i Cis 8 a sg a E ! f�=y a to �gi s�'0 Ty ; a z cyn yy2' s! <m RI OG7� nlli Y ��u�yi� Z 1 VM AVE BE r z 0 D Tm D Z r Z 41 CM rx HZE p� aNaZ � r TE�q I JNiEN-TON CF UiYQU( CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT PLAN iu., eas,ao r (4) KIOSK FOUNDATION PLAN Im It ram- • '�� s-� c, , KIOSK FOIINDATEON WALL � 1 I iF �k� I rd i ii3 T Kl05K EOUIPIIENT K" STORE # 031 REHTON 1i811 iV9fi AYE Y ,�Trron wn eeoss �O�IPa MEN�LoEPE�N6 .rn TYlE KROGER COMPANY AND PRE❑ MEYER 574RE$ INC- G �r aem sF mn AY�rwo= sroa- r,� FRED MEYER FUELING FACILITY ADDITION PRE -APPLICATION SET GENERAL _STRUCTURAL NOTES: cmToeAS caon n t Ippl � pj�E� ' � .� 3 CArIMM� rw, � s..vi s cwmev. w ne :aW-"rc c:wn a v i7�CANOPYCOLUMNFO4TiNG Ewa-= I/a- _R. �• '�•' ""`'"" "'�"� SITE NOTES FOR CANOPY INSTALLATION: MOTES - CONSTRUCTION AND L11 m. FOINDTION FLANS .a•wan �n� rn��c� Mom" Al02, IOSK 1NTERKIR ELEVATION - STORA6f RACK A I � UwrYHWY� .., sr WWI I. os.e ,zti A1R COMPRIE86OR M 0UNTING PLAN IiVl. h.n,Y�,a xM ora rps aret ru. ixa -rrrn ms.w� ,-A V� - -. iF K alnr: :rts•surm - rnu, a w r_rru r� iLil-1�-. lea. •SliWi .r.. .--iK F I"1 L i BOLLARD POST DETAIL "i I4 - • CURB A GUTTER i'd r , AREA LIGHT DETAIL- -- NO1L flk.eFfi la s[eE RN6 FOR OlMN�7T MIO 1DG110et r ,5AUICUOI TJNT I—kL . ya' - -a- STORE N 031 RENTON 1 reo[ 10lIIAVE sE rax.vt w• ams. THER COMPANYY AND AND FRED MEYER STORES INC. IY]F" �.� 6C111.9YdQ :. ..alaer. r1�ANCHOR BOLT PLAN L Sr - FRED MEYER FUELING FACILITY ADDITION _ PRE -APPLICATION ;i, =' SET „;- , mow• 5`* 05-15-08 PAYING TTIANSYRON DETAIL Ce = -- - r' � CONSTRUCTION ,JOINT rnuaa. c i[1� _ YARD EXPAMSION ,CONY DETAILS A3 s k y N, �h�ri � i I I I I I I I \� -- -• - yks3J�_ _+i; _ -.t— . � Via. � ;.-I I ; Iq I 1 •� � o I 1 ! I i til 1Dbtt AVE M !41 Slr. yy y[ W'1/1 r mm � l t mom' i .•°°'e �Im w z b r s R �}i � oy i .Q CA g r Xl ;• s 19 d j g 73 m = Z --" m mb�`� _m IT1 6i moI i' s � zoo r� K� ao 77 r z M u C r 0 Q Q D z 0 W D CO z n „. - Air f f Zryry } <�. i}. ” _ li 'k° 'ii"� •�� � i� � i�i ' ` ��VVllff . ---- —�- " . - E DTI t, -G All [n : . •. .�W,�`•.� ���f� � � -- �r-�i•flQi: _ ��: tip. -�•, , .a_ � 7 '�_.�..-.. ;, _� x--....a—_ter, ..�.—.— .. =�; � 4 g S 10M AYE 1� iy IA ram+ !� US gpg ash e11 ii ii k R z m co Cl) Z D Nybi $ �M � � irii �*fi w � q 02�m 3� G7mf 9 y ~ _ _ <f71 aG7 aDex ygg �8 z Opt : Jb P $ ¢ l�•,y,�4 i SOm �x is 3zm ; m A a,N a rymp :: w t A O STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on July 26, 2008. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $92.40. NOTICE. OF ENVIRONMENTAL ❑ETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RFNTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non - Significance -Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Fred Meyer Fueling Station LUA08-061, SA -A, F.CF Location: 17733 108th Avenue SE. The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the demolition ofa 5,700 square foot structure and construction of fueling station, with a 3,956 square foot canopy and a 1 12 square foot kiosk. The site is located within the Commercial Arterial (CA) nine. Appeals (if the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 11, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9N57. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Rcnton Municipal Code Section 4-8-1 10.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430 6510. �� Published in the Renton Reporter on July Linda M. Mills �N�N��s����l�l�� 26,2009.#90242. Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter pALSF ��aiit4555j Subscribed and sworn to me this 26th day of July, 2008. = A`.�ytioN 0 at y Da g, otary Pub ' for the State of Washington, Res'vi r pu�9 '�'- in Covin on, Washington �i��rrrt5� 1,,,.- Nc`�� P. O. Number: ��j�l 11� OF itit ,PG'�� City _ . 2enton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JULY 10, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 26, 2008 APPLICANT: Robert McNeill PLANNER: Rocal PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station PLAN REVI ER: Arneta Hennin er p SITE AREA: 12.5 acres EXISTING BL AREA (gross): 5 7 bare fee LOCATION: 17733 108'h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) 3,956 square feet WORK ORDER NO: 77917 PLEASE RETURN TO ROCALE TIMMONS IN CURRENT PLANNING 6T" FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway exteded from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy) Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts I More Information Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Hrstonc/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is.needed to properly assess this proposai. Signature of Director or tive Date CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: August 13, 2008 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Fred Meyer Fueling Station LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-061, ECF, SA -A Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: June 26, 2008 Applicant: Robert McNeill, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Owner: James Coombes, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Contact: Same as applicant PID Number: 3223059016 ERC Decision Date: July 21, 2008 ERC Appeal Date: August 11, 2008 Administrative Approval: July 21, 2008 Appeal Period Ends: August 11, 2008 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway exteded from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial CA zoning designation. Location: 10551 SE Carr Road Comments: Y ��j,- r..� Denis Law, Mayor August 13, 2008 Robert McNeill, Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72"d Avenue S Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Fred meyer Fueling Station LUA08-061, ECF, SA -A Dear Mr. McNeill: CIT'*OF RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended August 11, 2008 Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non -Significance Administrative Site Plan approval for the above -referenced project. for the Environmental Mitigated and the No appeals were filed on the ERC determination and Site Plan approval therefore, this decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-721.9. For the Environmental Review Committee, Roe e Timmons As ciate Planner Enclosure cc: James Coombes - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. / Owner(s) Louis Scannell / Party(ies) of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 95057 This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer RE NTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE 1) 1:01 r] I L0.1 r A -A ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTEC PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME_ Fred Meyer Fueling Station PROJECT NUMBER: WA08-061, FCF, SA -A LOCATIONS 17733101 Aver— SF, ❑ESCRIPTICN: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a vacant 5,667 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer sit. at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would Include the construction of a 3,956 square foot canopy and a 112 square font kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as a .fated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be yalned by an existing Internal driveway ertend.d from 1061h Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation, THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMNliTTEE f.ERCj HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmentai determination must be filed in writing on or botore 5:00 PM on August 11. 21 Appeals must he filed in writing together with the required $71.00 application fee with; Hearing Exaniner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 9BD57, Appeals to the Examiner are gcvemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 48-11 e.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510 IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED. A PIJBLIC HEARING WII. L BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & PCONICWO DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 431 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on�����,,��1ar���jl DATE: 4 �' SIGNED: • : � } ,,� /z V� ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing ire (ff ; r� {j � •• t5Aali),0 on the o�?S day of NOTARY PUBLI SIGNA tti1111\\\\� ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-061, ECF, SA -A LOCATION: 17733 108'h Avenue SE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a vacant 5,667 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include the construction of a 3,956 square foot canopy and a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway extended from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 11, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4.8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Y CITY 3F RENTON Department of Community and ♦ tE ♦ Economic Development . Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietseh, Administrator July 23, 2008 Robert McNeill, Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue S Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: Fred Meyer Fueling Station LUA08-061, ECF, SA -A Dear Mr. McNeill: This letter is written on behalf of the Enviroiunental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Nan -Significance -Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures, Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 11, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together, with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 114.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's 0fficc, (425) 430-651.0. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee. Ro le Timmons A sociate Planner Enclosure cc:. James Coombes - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. / Owner(s) Louis Scannell - Benson Dairy Queen / Party(ies) of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 R E 1V T a 1V Ai-1F.AU OF THE. CURVE This paper ccnlains 50 %recyded malerial, 30%post consumer CITY )F RENTON ■►� Denis Law, Mayor July 23, 2008 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietseb, Administrator Transmitter[ herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environzriental Review Coirinittee (ERC) on July21, 2008: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME- Fred Meyer Fueling Station PROJECTNUMBER: LUA08-061, ECF, SA -A VOCATION: 17733 108th Avenue SE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the dernolition of a vacant 5,667 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE, The proposal would include the construction of a 3,956 square foot canopy and a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway extended from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 11, 2008. Appeals must be fled in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call roe at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Roca Timmo Ass elate Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 This paper contains 50% recycled matenal, 30% post consumer RENTQN AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-061, SA -A., ECF APPLICANT: Robert McNeill, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a vacant 5,667 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include the construction of a 3,956 square foot canopy and a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway extended from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 17733 108t�' Avenue SE The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Krazan & Associates, dated April 14, 2008, during site clearing, grading, and building construction. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume 11 of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits 3. The applicant shall pay a transportation impact fee of $75.00 for each new weekday trip attributable to the project (estimated to be $37,950.00.) The fee would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-061, SA -A., ECF APPLICANT: Robert McNeill, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a vacant 5,667 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include the construction of a 3,956 square foot canopy and a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway extended from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 17733 108'h Avenue SE LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual.as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3_ Commercial, multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Water: Per the City Fire Marshall, the preliminary fire flow for this site is 1,500 GPM. Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This. distance is measured along the travel route. The number of additional hydrants required is dependent on the calculated fireflow hence if the fireflow remains at 1,500 GPM the minimum number of hydrants required for this facility shall be two. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a separate review. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 2 2. Existing hydrants approved to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. Show locations of all existing hydrants. 3. Landscape irrigation system will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Sanitary Sewer: 1. The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek sanitary sewer district for availability, fees, plan review and permits. Surface Water: 1 _ Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.405 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the site. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2_ A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report was submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Preliminary calculations show detention and water quality will not be required. 3. Roof drains are required to be tight lined to the storm system 4. Erosion control shall comply with Department of Ecology's most current Stormwater Management Manual. Transportation: 1. No street improvements are required Miscellaneous: 1. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m_ to 3:30 p-m. unless approved in. advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Any rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in freight to be built during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit. CONDITIONfSI: 1. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections be completed for the removal of the existing building prior to the approval of the building permit. ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of 2. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-061, SA -A., ECF APPLICANT: Robert McNeill, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Station DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a vacant 5,667 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include the construction of a 3,956 square foot canopy and a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway extended from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation, LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 17733 108«' Avenue SE LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.210,030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 11, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: le-InZ4 &MMZ�Z� - Gregg Zim ma , Ad inistrator Public Works Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services July 26, 2008 July 21, 2008 io Date I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Fire Department &ako - Date Alex Piefsch, Admin trator Department of Community & Economic Development ? zq A Date ID to ERC REPORT& i DECISION ERC AfEETUG D.-1 TP- Prnjccl Ivalne: Owner•: Applicant / Cunlact Tile ,Virn ber: Prnjeet Manager: llrgject 5umnua-v h-gjec•t Location ICILY Of Renton CON Department of Community and Economic Developme TE ,NAME K. T ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTE ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE DECISIO1 July 21, 200ti Fred Meyer Fucling Station d Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.: 3800 SE 22"' A% Portland, OR 97202 Barghausen Consulting I:muncers Inc.: Robert McNeil, 18215 72"" Ave S; Kent, WA 98499 LUA08-06I, SA -A, ECF Rocale Timinons, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval liar the co list.RlCtion of fueling station and tlic demolition of a vacant 5.667 sguarc 160 structure located on the existing Fred ]Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include the construction of 3.956 square foot canopy and a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling, dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed_ as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access v ill be uained by an cxistinur internal drivcw iv extended from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. 17733 108"' Ave SE lsist. Bldg, .4rea .V: N:'A Site ilrea: 544,500 sf (parcel) 26.144 sf (site:) Proposed." slek"..- wa (j« ottwint): 3.956 sf Pi-opo,se d ,Vew Blelg..41 a (ifro s.rl: 1 12 s l' Project Loc•atioii Map ERC and Site Plan Report 08-O61 ER C REPORT & DECISION ERC thfEE7TVG DATE: Project Name: Oivner; Applicant / Contact. F'ilc� Nttrnhcrr: Project 1Vanager: Prgjecl Srenu 7ai-v: Pro/e°ct Location: Grist. PhIg. Area SF I City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE DECISION July 21, 2008 Fred Meyer Fueling Station Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.; 3800 SE 72"1 Ave; Portland, OR 97202 Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc.; Robert McNeil; 18215 72"" Ave S; Kent, WA 98499 LU.A08-061, SA -A, ECF Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and :Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a vacant 5,667 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include the construction of a 3,956 square foot canopy and a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements_ Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway extended from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. 17733 108"' Avc SE N/A Site Area: 544,500 sf (parcel) 1)-oposc (l Ncw Bhkg, 4rea (Jimilrrint): 3,956 sf 26,144 -,f (site) Propo.,c l.l, ti Bldg. Area (gross): 112 sf Project Location Map ER and Site Plan Report 08-061 City of Renton DCED Administrative Site Plan Review c' Enviro mad Review Committee S1 ff Report FRED MEYER FUELEVG STA; LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF Report of July 21, 2008 Page 2 of 10 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 BACKGROUND The proposed project, a Fred Meyer Fueling Station, would be sited on a commercial building pad, 29,750 square feet in area. The commercial pad is located towards the north portion of a much larger parcel along l 08"' Ave SE. The larger parcel is currently developed with a Fred Meyer store and associated commercial uses. There is an existing 5,667 square foot building located on the commercial pad, formerly used by Schuck's Auto Parts, The applicant is proposing to remove the existing building and associated parking in order to site the fueling station. The property is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and within the Coarntncrcial Corridor (CC) Comprehensive Plan designation, Fueling stations are allowed uses in the CA zone. The surrounding zoning designations include Commercial Arterial (CA) and Residential Manufactured Homes (RM11). However, the RMH zoning designation is not located in close proximity to proposed project site. The proposed fueling station would be located in the center of the commercial building pad. The proposed structure would be located at the existing grade, however excavation is necessary to install two underground storage tanks; one 20,000-gallon tank (unleaded Duel) and one 16,000-gallon dual tank (supreme unleaded/diesel fuel). The volume of the cut would be approximately 1,200 cubic yards and the fill would be balanced on site with existing gravel. A total of 7 new parking spaces are proposed on site within a surface parking area located along the west side of the fueling station. The amount of impervious area would be increased with this project by 1,915 square feet, therefore existing landscaping is proposed to be removed to accommodate impervious maneuvering area. New landscaping, in the amount of 1,050 square feet, is proposed along the northern and western perimeter of the commercial pad. All landscaped areas would be irrigated with an underground, automated irrigation system. Access would be gained from existing curb cuts, along 108"' Ave SF, east and west of the commercial pad. No new access driveways are proposed. The proposed fueling station would have a 3,956 canopy that covers five gas fueling islands. A 112 square foot kiosk would be located in the cast -central portion of the fueling canopy. The height to the top of the canopy, the tallest portion of the proposed project, would be 19 feet. There are no known critical areas on or near the site. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW h-r compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following CnVlronn7ental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Krazan & Associates, dated April 14, 2008. during site clearing, grading, and building construction. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (1'ESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department. of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual, This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits 3. The applicant shall pay a transportation impact fee of S75.00 for each new weekday trip attributable to the project (estimated to be $37,950.00.) The fee would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits_ ERC and Site Plan Report 08-061 City of Renton DCED Administrative Site Plan Review & Enviro ntal Review Committee Staff Report FRED.VEYER FUELING STA7 . LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF Report of July 21, 2008 Pave 3 of 10 The Proposal ivas circulated and revicived dry various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in coniainction w°ith the proposed development. Stajl reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following prohahle impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The site is mostly level with slopes of one percent or less except for an abrupt 10 to 12 foot grade separation along the eastern perimeter. The grade separation is due to a portion of the extensive rockery existing on site that is used as a landscaping feature. The applicant proposes to excavate approximately 1200 cubic yards and filled with on -site gravel. A Geotechnical Engineering Study, prepared by Krazan & Associates and dated April 14, 2008, was submitted with the project application. The study notes the subsurface conditions consist of a pavement section containing asphaltic concrete and gravel base material underlain by approximately 24 to 35 feet of uncontrolled fill. The uncontrolled fill includes locally derived sand and silty sand material. Medium dense to dense controlled fill was encountered below the depths of S to 12 feet. The report states that on -site loose controlled fill and other loose/saturated soils are not suitable for the support of engineered structures. Therefore, several recommendations were made in the report for: sub -grade preparation.; canopy foundations; kiosk foundations; underground storage tank installation; parking and pavement area sub -grade preparation.; cut and fill requirements; erosion and sedimentation control; and structural fill. In order to limit impacts to the project site and neighboring properties that could occur during project construction, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that project construction comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Krazan & Associates, dated April 14, 2008. Mitigation Measures: The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Krazan & Associates, dated April 14, 2008, during site clearing, grading. and building construction. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations RMC 4-4-060 2. Air Impacts: There would be temporary negative impacts to air quality caused by dust and equipment exhaust during site and building construction. Following construction, exhaust from automobiles would be expected_ Such emissions are controlled by state and federal regulations. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable 3. Water a. Storm Water Impacts: The applicant submitted a "Technical Inforniation Report," by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (dated May 2008) as part of the application materials. Existing stormwater runoff, from the site, flows towards multiple existing catch basins where it is collected and conveyed through the existing underground stormwater conveyance system to the existing underground detention facility. The water is then treated and stored and eventually outfalls into a natural location. The applicant is proposing to install a new catch basin which would be tied into the existing conveyance system. The impervious area subject to vehicular traffic will not be significantly different than the pre - developed condition. However, the applicant is proposing to install an oil/water separator in order to provide additional water quality treatment. Staff recommends that a temporary erosion control plan be submitted that complies with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume Il of the most recent edition of the Stormwater Management Manual. The plan must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to issuance of the building permit. ER and Site Plan Report 08-061 City of Renton DCED administrative Site Plan Review & Enviro nial Review Committee Staff Report FRED MEYER FUELLNG STA _ LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF_ Report of July 21, 2008 Page 4 of 10 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to provide Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall he subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 4. Transportation Impacts: The project would be accessed, by means of existing curb cuts, from 108"' Ave SE. No street improvements would be required for this project. The proposed project is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, transportation impact fees would he assessed for the project at the rate of $75.00 per each new weekday trip (estimated. at 506 trips-- International Transportation Engineer). The estimated Transportation Impact fee would be 37,950.00. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a transportation impact fee of $75.00 for each new trip, estimated to be $37,950.00. The fee would be required to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution 3100, Ordinance 4489; SEPA 5. Fire & Police Impacts: The Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department have indicated they have the ability to provide .service to the project provided required improvements are made. A Fire impact Fee would not be assessed for the proposal because the proposed development would not result in an overall increase of square footage of commercial development within the site. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. C. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or `-Advisory Notes to Applicant." ✓ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX I Site Plan Review Conditional f e Sj) cial Permit for Gracie & Fill B. Exhibits Exhibit I Aerial Photograph Exhibit 2 7oning Map Exhibit 3 Site Plan Exhibit 4 Landscape Plan Exhibit 5 Exterior Elevations Shoreline Stthstcartiirtl Dei7eloprneni Permit Binding Site Plan Administrative Code Deterinination ERC and.Site Plan Report 08-061 CitY of Renton ICED Administrative Site. Plan Review & Enviro -rntal Review Committee SlaffReport FRED WYER FUELING STA ' LU 08-06I, SA -A, ECF Report of July 21, 2008 Page 5 of 10 C. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the appropriate recommendations have been incorporated into this report. D. Consistency with Site Development Plan Review Criteria The Site Development Plan Review Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200 of the Renton Municipal Code forms the basis of the Site Plan Review, as follows. 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and polieies; The Comprehensive Plan band Use Map designation for the site is Commercial Corridor (CC). The Community Design section of the plan offers guidance for new structures. The following Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies of the Land Use and Community Design Elements are applicable to the proposal: Objective LU-EEE: Create opportunities for development and re -development of land in portions of the Commercial Corridor designation for general business and service uses. These include a wide range of restaurant, small-scale to big -box retail, offices. auto dealers, light industrial, and residential uSCS. ✓ Policy Objective Met I Not Met Policy LU-349: Support development plans incorporating the following features: 1) Shared access points and fewer curb cuts; 2) Internal circulation among adjacent parcels; 3) Shared parking facilities; 4) Allowance for future transition to structured parking facilities; 5) Centralized signage; 6) Unified development concepts; and 7) Landscaping and streetscape that softens visual impacts. ✓ Policy Objective Meat I i Not Met Policy LU-370: Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and screening devices such as ber-rns and fencing should be employed to reduce impacts (e.g. visual, noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less intensive uses. � Policy Objective Met Not Met 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The purpose of the CA zone is to evolve from strip eonnnercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site planning, incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities and boulevard treatment. The CA zone provides for a wide variety of indoor and outdoor retail sales and services. A fueling facility is an outright permitted use within the CA zone. Lot Coverag, The CA zoning designation allows a maximum building coverage of 65 percent of the site area, The proposed canopy footprint of 3,956 square feet on the 26,144 square foot commercial building pad results in a building lot coverage of 15.1 percent. The proposed fueling facility complies with the development standard for lot coverage. Setbacks — The CA zoning designation would require a minimum front yard setback of 10 feet which may be reduced to zero feet trough the site plan development review process. No other side or rear yard setbacks are required. The proposed building would be setback from the front property line approximately 57 feet and 2 inches. As proposed, the project complies with the required CA zoning setbacks prescribed by City Code. FRC and Site Plan Report 08-061 City ofRenton DCED Administrative Site .Plan Review c& Enviro �ntal Revieiv Committee Staff Report FRED VEYER FUELING STA; . L UA08-06I, SA A, ECF Report of July 21, 2008 _ Page 6 of 10 Landscaping-- The CA zone requires a 10-foot landscape strip along the street frontage, except where reduced through the site plan development review process. An inventory of existing landscaping and a conceptual landscape plan was submitted as part of the application materials. The inventory depicts approximately 20 feet of existing landscaping along 108`' Ave SF and additional landscaping within the site. The following vegetation is proposed to remain along 108"' Ave SE: three Armstrong Maple trees and one Little I:eaf Linden tree; I lolly, Japanese Privet, and Rhododendron shrubs; ivy, and lawn groundcover. Elsewhere on site, three Sweetgum trees are proposed for removal and three Flowering Cherry trees are proposed to be retained. The applicant is proposing to provide additional landscaping onsite which include the planting of: three American Sweet Gum trees: Pink Abelia, White Rockrose, Yellow Daylily, and IIeavenly Bamboo shrubs: and Kinnikitinick groundcover. The landscape plan is consistent with landscape requirements. Underground sprinkler systems are required to be installed and maintained for all landscaped areas. The sprinkler system shall provide full water coverage of the planted areas specified on the plan. A detailed landscape plan and irrigation plan will need to be submitted at the time of building permit review. Height — The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The tallest point of the building would be canopy that covers the fueling islands and the kiosk, which would have a height of 19 feet and 0 inches, The development is consistent with the building height requirements. Parking/Circulation — The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses. The parking ratio for shopping centers, or any business within a shopping center, is a rninitnum of 4 spaces to a maximum of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet_ The proposed facility is located within the Benson Plaza Shopping Center, which would have 148,070 square feet of net floor area with the construction of the proposed fueling facility. Based on the parking requirement a mininiurn of 592 to a maximum of 740 parking spaces would need be required. Once the existing building and associated parking are removed 605 parking spaces would be provided. The applicant is proposing to provide 7 additional parking spaces resulting in a total of 612 spaces. Therefore, the parking is consistent with the City's parking requirements for the entire parcel and the new fueling facility. The parking confbnrrs to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls for surface lots. Signage — Proposed signage was not reviewed as part of the Site Plan Review. Signage will be reviewed under a separate permit. 3. Witigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; City staff does not anticipate any adverse impact on surrounding properties and uses. The site is currently developed with a Fred Mcycr store and associated commercial uses_ The surrounding areas contain a wide variety of retail and service uses and several different structural forms, from small professional offices to medium scale strip malls with major anchors such as Fred Meyer. The proposed project is anticipated to be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses as permitted irr the CA zone. The canopy and kiosk will meet all required setbacks from property lines and will provide more than the code requires for a side and rear yard setbacks. According to code, parking lot lighting fixtures are to be non -glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above the ground. This is to help minimize the impact onto abutting properties and on -site buildings. 4. Ilitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; There is an existing 5,667 square foot building located on the commercial pad, formerly used by 5chuck's Auto Parts; proposed for removal. Staff recommends as a condition of site plan approval that the applicant obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections be completed for the removal of the existing building prior to the approval of the building pern-iit. ERC and Site Plan Report 08-061 City of Renton DCED Administrative site Plan Review & Enviro ental Review Committee Staff Report FRED AIEYER FUELING STA: LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF Report of July 21, 2008 Page 7 of 10 The scale, height and bulk of the proposed fuel facility addition to the existing shopping center development is appropriate for the site and is consistent with the purpose and appearance of adjacent existing development. The site will be landscaped to complement existing landscaping on the rest of the shopping center property. The commercial building pad is 26,144 square feet and would have a building lot coverage of 15.1 percent. The fueling facility would be placed at the center of the commercial building pad. The proposal includes the construction of a 3,956 square foot canopy that would cover a 112 square foot kiosk, located in the east -central portion of the fueling canopy_ Tile facility would also [lave five multi -product dispensers, creating ten fueling positions. The kiosk would include work space and a restroom for one employee. The Fred Meyer fueling facility is designed to compliment the aesthetic elements already on site. The corporate colors (red and platinum), logos and minimal signage levels are selected and placed to provide a visual link with the existing Fred Meyer retail operation. The tallest point of the proposal would be the canopy, which would have a height of 19 feet and O inches_ 5. Conservation of area -wide property values; The proposed development is expected to conserve and possibly increase property values in the vicinity of the site. The development of the site provides improvements to infrastructure, landscaping, lighting and additional employment opportunities. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Primary access to the site is proposed via existing curb cuts along 1 OS"' Ave SF. The site development would include 7 new parking stalls within the surface lot, which complies with the parking requirements for the proposed use. RMC 4-2-120A states that a pedestrian connection shall be provided from a public entrance to the street, in order to provide direct, clear and separate pedestrian walks from sidewalks to building entries and internally from buildings to abutting retail properties. The applicant has not proposed pedestrian connectivity due to the vehicular orientation of the proposal. The proposed kiosk would not serve as a convenience store, therefore very little if no walk-up service would be necessary. Staff concurs that pedestrian connectivity would not enhance the proposed project, and does not need to be provided. 7. 11itiga£ion of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposed development is not anticipated to generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a fuehrig facility. Adequate separation of fuel pump islands and tank access have been proposed to avoid health/safety concerns. S. Availability of'public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; Utility services would be provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District for water, sanitary sewer. 9. Frevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight; No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of this proposal_ As long as development standards are maintained, the development would be compatible with the existing neighborhood, and constitute a substantial investment in the community. E. FEVDLVG.S, COACL U.51011FS & DECISION I laving reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the Fred Meyer Fueling Station, LUA 08 -061, SA -A, FCF. ERC and Site Pian Report 08-061 City of Renton DCED FRED MEYER FUELING STA1 Report of July 21, 2008 administrative Site Plan Review & Enviro -ntal Review Committee Stajy"Report LUA08-061, SA A, ECF Page 8 of 10 2) Environmental Review: The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a determination of non -significance -mitigated (DNS-M) and imposed three mitigation measures on July 21, 2008. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's Site Plan Review application complies with the requirements for information necessary for site plan review. The applicant's plans are entered as Exhibits No. 1-5. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies for the Commercial Corridor land use designation. 5) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial zone provided all conditions of approval are complied with. F. CONCLUSIONS 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies for the Commercial Corridor land use designation and Commercial Arterial zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 3) The City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has reviewed the proposal and issued a Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) and imposed three mitigation measures. G. DECISION. The site plan for Fred Meyer Fueling Station, Project File No. LUA 08-061, SA -A, ECF is approved subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and all required inspections be completed for the removal of the existing building prior to the approval of the building permit. C.E. Vincent, Planning Director TRANSMITTED this 21" day of July 2008 to the Applicant/Owner/Contact: Fred Meyer Stores Barghausen Consulting Engineers James Coombes Robert McNeil 3800 SE 22°d Avenue 18215 72❑d Ave S Portland, OR 97202 Kent, WA 98032 TRANSMITTED this 21s'day of July 2008 to the Parties of Record: Benson Dairy Queen Louis Scannell 17824 108`h Avenue Renton, WA 98055 TRANSY111TTF-D this 21" day of July 2008 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Neil Watts, Development Services Director Decision ate ERC and Site Plan Report 08-061 City of'Renton DCBD FRED MEYER FUELING STAI Report of July 21, 2008 C.E. Vincent, Planning Director Kayren Kittrick Fire Marshal Renton Reporter Administrative Site Plan Review & Envirot - nial Review Committee Staff Report L UA08-061, SA -A, ECF Page 9 of 10 Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 11, 2008(14 days from the date appeal period ends), Land Use Decision Appeal Process: Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on August 11, 2008 (14 days from the date appeal period ends). Both decisions will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on August 11, 2008. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Examiner. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: Site Plan Approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M. AD VISOR Y NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Water: 1. Per the City Fire Marshall, the preliminary fire flow for this site is 1,500 GPM. Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. The number of additional hydrants required is dependent on the calculated fircllow hence if the fireflow remains at 1,500 GPM the minimum number of hydrants required for this facility shall be two. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a separate review. 2_ Existing hydrants approved to be counted as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already installed. Note on plan if required. Show locations of all existing hydrants. 3. Landscape irrigation system will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Sanitary Sewer: I . The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek sanitary sewer district for availability, fees, plan review and permits_ Surface Water: 1. Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $0.405 x the total square feet of the new impervious surface area of the site. Payment of fees will be required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report was submitted with the site plan application. The report addresses ERC and Site Plan Report 08-061.doe City of Renton DCED Administrative Site Plan Review & Enviror FRED MEYER FUELING STA I Report of July 21, 2008 ntal Review Committee Staff Report L UA08-061, SA -A, ECF Page 10 of 10 detention and water quality requirements as outlined in the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual. Preliminary calculations show detention and water quality will not be required. Roof drains are required to be tight lined to the storm system Erosion control shall comply with Department of Ecology's most current Stormwater Management Manual, Transportation: 1. No street improvements are required Miscellaneous: 1. Construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. 2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Any rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height to be built during construction of utilities requires a separate building permit. ERG and Site Plan Report 08-061.doe Renton --- Renton City Limits Parcels SCALE 1 : 4,718 200 0 200 400 600 FEET A/ EXHIBIT 1 httpa/ientonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:52 AM D, P R �Yl �iwH 11 1 1- GS- j 5F 1271,>t _� � j':: PIh�T' � _ Z ��'C �� ILL, ILI I U R-8 LIU R-4 �a srVnwr LA 7.1 HUY-, hq 0 11144 J R6 1w l 3 RC Sw 43, Si S ayd;. RMH }fii R-8 RIC IF R-8 Q�N' —4 1Y i; I L 1 --9F. L 'IS ®r S'r A 2DDih S 2 til rF EXHIBIT 2 Benson Hill Communities, CPA# 2007-M-06 StafflPlanring COMMtSSiDn Recommendation Zoning Desiprial Comp Plan - Land use R-1 - I DU per Acre RMF - Residential Mull! Family I Residental Low Density R-4 : 4 DU Acre RMH - Residential Manufactured Homes i Resideril Single Family R-8 8 Dupe Acre CA - Commercial Al = Residential Medium Density R- 10 - 10 DU per Acre GN - Commercial Neighborhood = Residental Multi Family — R-14 - 14 DU per Ave CO CommercialOfflw = Commercial Neighborhood Annexation Boundary =3 Commercial Corridor — City Limits a lilt', � � � � o00000000000 00 0 oo�oo� � o000 � p env yea AwW m FI Lu a CL 2 J_ ws C W :A LANDSCAPE PLAN-nNG PLAN T �I EXHIBIT 4 L.ANXIICAM PLANT MATE;VAL LEMW .,.mL ... Teo!rrar_L ao.lalf rots wnarmf axfllc I � 'Liam-' 1 IIFRCXI T1lL WII Y al C LO` I SIMG Y.�aC WiYi fcml IYmlf 91RV09 � �AAIIIO O0A1P / ' _ »' Tot fo wve S IaIY Mp!]16 9fIA6 wo i� LaMs..� � ,r - n• aY ac n nav r noL ®mrs vf� wo nua IlOC1�Uf1� 91! lA v SIG 1 1Y - f! Y pG Y �nL Y !Y)1 RIW4 9N.i I1011� CAI �ItS: MILt� W5 JiIr1YiP ! i Itli ,Y ¢c a n4Y IfM IT eGY la�d4 4MLrf wO 1R9 �14 V1146T/Pf IH IXQf L-0 PMI IQVI6 IUwIMo P,IL m BYIL �� •M ng1fGT f,uvlc ue �c m �� ra Ieo7n nAnw r+.� F`d MOW S LORE W 031 RENTON 1T 1(m AYESE mmmI,,t wA9M6S THEKROGER COMPANY AND FR€D MEYER STORES INC. 30M BE AyrM X PORiIAIR, arwam. PiAQ SCf.=A0N AS AMP f" .pk+A FR£D MEYER FUELING FACILITY ADDITION S.E.P_A. REVIEW MAY 2008 DKOM eDIP sAh °F LANDSCAPE 7u PLANTING ,•Aanlcraf con TdI Frce PLAN 1 (SOO) L1 -WO vjwNG DAYS ass' DEFGRE YOU DIG �i �F"redN+p S EAR ELEVATION 1 EAST / I I38lh C7.1 FRO7 ELEVATION ! W ES7 J PARKING LOT Y b AJA OLT ELEVATION J NORTFI EFsc-ur --I/A • 1 --c -. b KIOSK GRAPHICS r � edMeyer 1 CANOPY GRAPHlGS EXHIBIT 5 s''i z .�r,� ;qn ill - �: x ��r rr �i.aw�. •ro. l I i`I V R111w ELEVATION 1$OUT" _. n SECTION AT CANOPY SIGN SLYE.: M.i.S - - r.r.rn.n you nmrm n cv.un n �[ C nnC �A4 prw IW�[ far-�.rwFlm IY x . 4w1[ �. r � o wa f,�en v.... y- Mn[ sf� u11V�4 oKr mtlYctl r rwi.�Marm mmY¢¢� 9 �S mll�1CN1 - oc. ro r�r wAr+ rywurn t cwn�crp+ ono.T rA,,.ww n wr �"AYIr¢ P+11c - a[. is na'� Mew a4Pr F(MM �F1F:RM� nP 7ot � aca i ]1w 9Q[ tn/{ MtlYltii .C. %/ MiWP WYMm aM�LL ILIle6 ww�L sl �maurs N IYiOC tCVSr'¢[/M�Id�rY SUYK[ [NFL _ _ fo IrfAC TlW�/r6 t00014 UMv mr,[RMUYt U'N'Lf4Df�D MIi�-,R6E SErL mmm CCANOPY PRICE SIGN GRAPHICS &J 5�xE: i, _ i _o ftwmfew STORE # 031 RENTON 1YB01 10Poh AVE g T�JiTp1, WA sadf6 THE KROG£R COMPANY AND FWD MEYER STORES INC. 3800 Y ?2N� AVEMLE raFn r vw o. OF+EctlM. 9Tt➢2 sm zn aau �rgr_r49 FA% ORA& .t FRED MEYER FUELING FAC14iTY ADDITION PRE -APPLICATION SET 05.15.06 N � see¢r ''ewu t p uiFµoEeumr�d EXTERIOR ELEVATIOT AND SIGNAGE I^n A2 City of ____ton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( COMMENTS DUE: JULY 10, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 26, 2008 APPLICANT: Robert McNeill PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Hennin er SITE AREA: 12.5 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 5,700 sqA&e2t6 r' LOCATION: 17733 1081h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) 3,95 r f e WORK ORDER NO: 77917 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway exteded from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Faith Air Water Plants Land/shoreline Use Animais En vironmerrlai Healfir Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li MlGlare Recreativn Utilities Transportation Pubfic Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiorral information is needed to properly a�s�posal [ t7 CD Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � 'Ir1 I G [J.t,� COMMENTS DUE: JULY 10, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-061, SA -A, FCF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 26, 2008 APPLICANT: Robert McNeill PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 12.5 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 5,700 square feet LOCATION: 17733 108th Avenue SF PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) 3,956 square feet WORK ORDER NO: 77917 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway exteded from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Wale( Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environrnerrlaf Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li h6'Glarc Recreation Utilities Transportation Pubirc Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. • I COMMENTS r 1 / �. • / r aIle We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh e additional information is needed to pro erly assess this proposal. Z 4�2_ - �__ f'Z 7� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative A Date CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: July 8, 2008 TO: Rocale Timmons FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 SUBJECT: FRED MEYER GAS STATION LUA 08-061 17733 108TH AVE SE I have completed my review on the above application located at the SW corner of the intersection of Benson and SE Carr Rd in Section 32, Township 23N, Range 5E and have the following comments. Existing Water: This site is not in the City of Renton water service boundary. The project site is located in Soos Creek Water District service area. Sanitary Sewer: This site is not in the City of Renton sanitary sewer service boundary. The project site is located in Soos Creek Sewer District service area. Storm: The City does not have any storm records at this project location. REQUIREMENTS Water: • Per the City Fire Marshall, the preliminary fire flow for this site is 1,500 GPM. Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and additional hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. The number of additional hydrants required is dependent on the calculated fireflow hence if the fireflow remains at 1,500 GPM the minimum number of hydrants required for this facility shall be two. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a separate review_ Sanitary Sewer: + The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek sanitary sewer district for availability, fees, plan review and permits. Street Improvements: • A Transportation Mitigation fee per the ITE Manual 7th edition will be required to be paid prior to issuance of a construction permit. This fee is $37,950. • Additonal street improvements will not be required. Street lighting is required for a project this size along the frontages of the parcel being developed. All street lighting shall be per City of Renton standards and specifications. Private street lighting is not allowed. Additional street lighting may not be required as determined at the time of plan review. Construction of a commercial building will trigger a separate review. Fred Meyer Fueling Station 17733 108th Ave SE Storm: • A conceptual drainage plan and report was submitted with the formal application for the project and is in order. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 per square foot (but not less than $1012) of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. General: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Kayren K 1:1PrnjectsWREDM EY ERGASGF, docicor City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P � ��{[ COMMENTS DUE. JULY 10, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 26. 2008 APPLICANT: Robert McNeill PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Me er Fuelin Station PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger t"" SITE AREA: 12.5 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 5,700 s NU [DIVISION LOCATION: 17733 108"' Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) 3,956 square feet WORK ORDER NO: 77917 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway exteded from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy,' Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li htlGlare Recreation Utilities Trans ortation Public Services HistorlclCuit ural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet 5 ee We have reviewed this aFplication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ' dditionai in rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal, Signature of rector dr Authorized Representati Date Project Name: V"m, ��Nev 'EueuQh S?2jj 1o_tJ_ Project Address: 07 �)5 . SO$µ'` N e SE Contact Person: �Zphevk 'MC 1 r-'\%_ - Permit Number: WPC 0t _okoI Project Description: 5,1115la. L,�,'�'„�_ Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential E-ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7`" Edition Retail Traffic Study ❑ Non -retail ❑ Other Calculation: 5��� iNC S p 1p ACI T_ Transportation Mitigation Fee: r Calculated by: Date of Payment: City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C ;�. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 10, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF CIIVVr ht:'V1; DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 26, 2008 ;^: 17 APPLICANT: Robert McNeill PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station J PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 12.5 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 5,700 s fiW"4G DIVISIUN LOCATION: 17733 108th Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) 3,956 square feet WORK ORDER NO: 77917 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway exteded from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Ammals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources T�AF 5F ' 2' 31 fo --k 3 7171dvVab B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housir Aesthetics Li htlGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclCuhural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Y� FIRE DEPARTMENT ♦'7 k }+� M E M 0 R A N D U Mtu DATE: 7/6/08/08 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Reviewer CC: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner FROM: David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: LUA08-061 Fred Meyer Fueling Station Review of current plans and material, previous pre -application material and on site review have disclosed the following Fire Code and Policy related issues and concerns that need to be addressed for SEPA and Administrative Site Plan approval to be recommended. Renton Fire & Emergency Services comments: 1. On January 14, 2008 there were comments drafted by Assistant Fire Marshal David Pargas and presented at the January 17, 2008 Pre -Application meeting. The requirements that were noted on this date are still applicable to this project with a few minor changes. The changes are as a result of the 2006 local Fire Code Amendments being adopted. 2. Revisions to the January 14`h 2008 comments: A} Prior to the 2006 Local Fire Code Amendments adoption, unattended Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing Facilities were not allowed. As a result of the recent Local Fire Code Amendments adoption unattended Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing Facilities shall be allowed. Unattended self- service motor fuel dispensing facilities shall comply with sections 2204.3.1 through 2204.3.7 of the 2006 International Fire Code. B) Prior to the 2006 Local Fire code Amendments adoption, Back up Power was not required. Recent adoption of the 2006 Local Fire Code Amendments adoption shall now require Emergency and Stand -By Power systems. Emergency and Stand -By Power systems shall comply with certain sections of section 604 of the 2006 International Fire Code. Pleas Contact the Assistant Fire Marshal for further clarification of this requirement. C) Clarification of Item it 4 noted on 1/17/08. The turning radius shall be 25 feet to the inside and 45 feet to the outside. D) Flammable & Combustible Liquid Storage: Clarification is that a permit shall be required for each tank. iAcity memos108 final & prelim revllua08-061 fred meyer fueling station.doc 3. No Fire Mitigation Fees shall be required for this project. Any questions or concerns regarding the Fire comments made pertaining to this review may be directed to Assistant Fire Marshal David Pargas at 425-430-7023. iAcity memos108 final & prelim revllua08-061 fred meyer fueling station.doc f r City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: — �c— COMMENTS DUE: JULY 10, 2 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 26, 208 APPLICANT: Robert McNeill PLANNER: Rocale Timmons 6 PROJECT TITLE Fred Meyer Fueling Station PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta H nnin 6r_______ SITE AREA: 12.5 acres s EXISTING BLDG AREA(gross: 5,700 square feet LOCATION: 17733 1081h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) 3,956 square feet WORK ORDER NO: 77917 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway exteded from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Eovironmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Envirownmt 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Iva r r1PIrrI.,&71l&� e 77,ecs � fir' C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS C &I ;�� �1 -7/0.1/ / , -ot e, e� e.01 � r � et, ""ee le iL_'O AWW e4lt 1-5— f / 7 vl , l We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of ton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1 O, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF GATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 26, 2008 APPLICANT: Robert McNeill PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Fred Meyer Fueling Station PLAN REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 12.5 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 5,700 square feet LOCATION: 17733 108tr' Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) 3,956 square feet WORK ORDER NO: 77917 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway exteded from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Piants LandlShoreline Use A nimafs Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources B_ POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Hausin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreatfan utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclCull ural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 feet 7LJ 6zv -;t P?46., We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Ze Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DA7E: June 26. 20De LAND USE NUMBER: LUAU5-061, SA -A. LCF PROJECT NAMr= Fred Meyer Fueimg 3tzru. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Ertvlrrnmental ($EPA) Review anc Administrative Site Plan approval for the oonslructicn of fueling st hoc and 9re dmoll a1 a 5,700 square fool structure baled on the ex,sting Fred Meyer site al 17733 105ti'� Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy t,Ih a 112 square foot kicsk. Ne lueiins dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as weft as assoo:aled parking, tandscaomg, and utility rmproveroenis, Access will be gained by an existing irternal driveway —landed h-or„ : U81h Ave SE. The site is located w the Commercial Arterial {GA) mr-ing designation. PROJECT LOOATION: 1 7?3J iU8h Ave,:ue SE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS -MI: As the Lead Agency, the Cty of Renton has determined that significant envincir lay rmpacta are ud!kery to result from the wwased project Therel as pem,ittec under the RCW 43-21 C.110, the City of Renton -s using the ODtienal DNS-M process to give notice that s DNS- M is likely to be issued. Ccmmenl periods for the project and the proposed pN5-M are integrated 'role a single Wmmenl period. There will be no nn,nment 1p iod following the issuance at the Threshold Determination o! Non-Sig,urroance- Mttlgated (ONS-Mj A 1e-day appeal levied will f.11—'he issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATI- June 78. 2n05 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICA71ONJune 26, 2006 APPLICANTWROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Robert McNeill, Senior Planner - Barghausen Consulting Engineer., Inc.', TW, {425) 251-6Z22, Fort bmcneill@barghausen com PermitslReview Requested'. Environmental (SERA) Review Administrative Site Plan approval Other Permits which may 4e requiredBuilding and Construction Permits Requested Studies: Location where applicatron may be reviewed. PUBLIC HEARING. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZoninglLand Us«_ Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Drainage Report Department of Community & Economic Development {Cl- Planning OlVision , Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 NSA The swivel sne +s desiocated Condor iCG; on vie City of Renton C>mprenensr,e Land Use Map are Ccmme•c,ai Arfenaf (CA) or, the City, Zoning Map- Envrnrmental 1SEPA) Ch.e ckhst Proposed Mitigation Measures: The foll119 Mil'galioc U n,.,es will li,rely be imposed on the proposed prclect. These recommenced Mdtgation Measures address project ,mpa0s not rove,el dr existing codes aid mgr laliuns w riled above. • The applrcant vr,"!! he �egc,rad re fcllo:r- the recentrr,endations conlamed v,;thin the 7echnicw f„inrrna!'on Repc4 Prepared ror this Aroje;! with regard !u the dslcrbrnce, Arenarati�n and rvrstrerctrpn of the site. • the appk.W has Pay the appropriate Traffic Miliyafion Fee bxseo on 5?5 CC Per mrca new averoge daffy Inc assa:ialed with the crojecf prior to the issuance a hmidrng permits, • Temper- y c,daion sad Sedrmenta!icn Controi Measures shall he ms!aflerf a.vd met ii—ed to !hu sapsfacliun of the represenretiVe or the Deve;cpment Service.. C Ov ,on for 11,e duration of the project. Comments on the above application must be subrnitled in writing to Rocale Timmons. Associate Planner CEP - Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, R-1— WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on July 1% 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to 5e made a party of 'ecord and receive addilional notlfiaelion by mail, eonlact the Pi Manager Anyone who submits wnhen Covl nts mtil aul_ tm ally become a part,; of reeerf and will he —hfled of any decisioo on this pro1.ot CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: {425) 430-7219; Errtl: rtimmons@ci,renton.wa.➢8 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION The prppu will he s -od:l g the ns as $EPA wdmanee, Rk1C 4.2 17UA and If you would like to be made a party Of record to remve further Informatior On th15;jroposed project, Complete otoer appGcab�e codes ar�d regulations as appropriate. this form and return to: Ckty of Renton, CED - Planning Di wision, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. NarneiFile No.: Fred Meyer Funling Stalinrll- 98A61 SA -A, ECF NAME. MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO- CERTIFICATION hereby certify that 3L— copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the des ribed property o�������wtlick ���u� DATE: `' ° SIGNED: 111 }3� .4. Q' ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State Of Washington residin in C) on the _W I day of NOTARY PUB L C SIG tlll%N A CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 26th day of June, 2008, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist & Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing. Agencies See Attached Robert McNeill Applicant/Contact James Coombes - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. Owner Surrounding Property Owners - NOA only See Attached (Signature of Sender); STATE OF WASHINGTON } " SS COUNTY OF KING } I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ��%4t ublic in and for Notary (Print): My appointment expires: _ 1 I Project Name: I Fred Meyer Fueling Station I I Project Number: I LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF I template - affidavit of service by mailing r AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology * WDFW - Larry Fisher" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept, Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Sox 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 — 172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Boyd Powers Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev, & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 160t' Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application. template - affidavit of service by mailing 322305929505 AMRIT INC DBA PO BOX 59685 RENTON WA 98058 322305910505 BILC FLORENTINA 17655 109TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98005 322305917500 HEARTLAND AUTOMOTIVE SERVIC 11308 DAVENPORT ST OMAHA NE 68154 322305920108 MAEHREN MARCIA L PO BOX 494303 REDDING CA 96049 322305908707 ANDES L L C 13239 SE 51ST PL BELLEVUE WA 98006 322305901603 FRED MEYER STORES INC PO BOX 42121 PORTLAND OR 97201 322305902007 KC HOUSING AUTHORITY 600 ANDOVER PARK W TUKWILA WA 98188 322305911909 MCDONALDS CORP 046/0138 PO BOX 182571 COLUMBUS OH 43218 322305933408 322305910406 MEZA VICTOR MANUEL M+MONREAL PRUZAN BUILDING CO LP PATRICIA PO BOX 9386 17661 109TH AVE SE SEATTLE WA 98109 RENTON WA 98055 322305923706 SEND LLC 10545 SE CARR RD RENTON WA 98055 322305909002 STORAASLI DOUG BENSON DAIRY QUEEN 913 SUNSET DR MANSON WA 98831 322305926006 BALACLAVA HOLDINGS INC 1508 W BROADWAY STE 900 VANCOUVER BC V63 1W8 CANADA 322305929901 HARMANBENSON HILL INC #338 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN 5544 S GREEN ST MURRAY UT 84123 322305912006 KIN PROPERTIES INC 185 NW SPANISH RIVER BLVD SUITE 100 BOCA RATON FL 33431 322305905406 MELLON TRUST OF WADESIMONE 1201 3RD AVE STE 5010 SEATTLE WA 98101 322305933002 RAINIER BELLS INC 31919 1ST AVE S #206 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 292305915103 SUMMERHILL PLACE L L C C/O GRAN INC 1021 1ST AVE W SEATTLE WA 98119 322305904003 322305906503 322305905307 TITAN MANAGEMENT LLC TRIMARK NORTH BENSON LP WAISS G STEVEN+ROBERTA 23414 SE 251ST PL 406 ELLINGSON RD 20702 SE 162ND WAY MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 PACIFIC WA 98047 RENTON WA 98059 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER =16111x611111.I_l,NDS June 26, 2008 LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF Fred Meyer Fueling Station PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of fueling station and the demolition of a 5,700 square foot structure located on the existing Fred Meyer site at 17733 108th Ave SE. The proposal would include a 3,956 square foot canopy with a 112 square foot kiosk. Five fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, as well as associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Access will be gained by an existing internal driveway extended from 108th Ave SE. The site is located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. PROJECT LOCATION: 17733 108r" Avenue SE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE; June 18, 2008 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 26, 2008 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Robert McNeill, Senior Planner - Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc.; Tel: (425) 251-6222; El bmeneili@barghausen.com PermitslReview Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan approval Other Permits which may be required: Building and Construction Permits Requested Studies: Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) — Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW- ,Zoning/Land Use: The subject site is designated Commercial Corridor (CC) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial Arterial (CA) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the Citys SEPA ordinance. RMC 4-2-120A and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above • The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained within the Technical information Report prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. • The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project, prior to the issuance of building permits • Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be instalied and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, CED — Pianning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on July 10, 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail. contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219; Eml: rtimmons@cLrenton.wams PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED — Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Fred Meyer Fueling StationlLUA08-061, SA -A, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Y CIT=' OF RENTON ..0 R) 4 — Denis Latin, Mayor June 26, 2008 Robert McNeill, Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue S Kent, OVA 98032 Subject: Fred Meyer Fueling Station LUA08-061, SA -A, ECF Dear Mr. McNeill: Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator The Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on July 21, 2008. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Roc• e Timmons As ciate Planner cc: James Coombes - Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. / Owner(s) 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 This paper contains 50%recyded material, 30% post consumer RENTON AHEAD OP THE CURVE • lEV-LOPMENT PLANT City of Renton :TYOF RENTON LAND USE PERMIT JUN 18 2008 MASTER APPLICATION qECENED PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc clo James Coombes, RE Entitlements Manager ADDRESS 3800 SE 22nd Avenue CITY_ ZIP: Portland OR 97202 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 503-797-5617 james.coombes@fredmeyer.com APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME Robert McNeill, Senior Planner COMPANY (if applicable) Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. ADDRESS: 18215 72nd Avenue S CITY: Kent WA ZIP: 98032 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-251-6222 bmcneill@barghausen.com CONTACT PERSON NAME: Robert McNeill, Senior Planner COMPANY (if applicable). Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. ADDRESS- 18215 72nd Avenue S CITY: ZIP. Kent WA 98032 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS- 425-251-6222 bmcneill@barghausen.com PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Fred Meyer Fueling Facility 1 Benson Plaza PROJECTIADDRESS(S)Ii-OCATION AND ZIP CODE 17733 108th Avenue SE, Renton WA 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S) 322305-9016 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant Commercial Structure (Auto Parts) PROPOSED LAND USE(S). Fueling Facility: Canopy, Kiosk.. Dispensers & Tanks EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION Commercial Corridor (CC) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): No Change EXISTING ZONING: Commercial Arterial (CA) PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable) No Change SITE AREA (in square feet): Parce11544.500 Site126,144 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: No Dedication Proposed SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: No Additional Easements Anticipated PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): Not Applicable NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): Not Applicable NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable) Not Applicable Q.NNeh p%% &A ce1% roans I+lannine ning'eT IF1) t ioc 09,1`)01 Ir PROJECT INFORMA NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable) - Not Applicable SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable) Not Applicable SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): Nat Applicable SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable) 3,956/Canopy, 1121Kiosk SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable) Not Applicable NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 3,956/Canopy. 1121Kiosk NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable) 1 TION continued PROJECT VALUE: $250.o00 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable) AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO J FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. I'L O GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. L] SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq, ft. J WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 32 , TOWNSHIP 23 . RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for.- 1 SEPA Environmental Review 3. 2 Administrative Site Plan Review Staff will calculate aDDlicable fees and gostage: $ Robert McNeill a AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I (Print Namels) . declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing staternents and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Robert McNeill signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the c uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of OwnerlRepreseniative) jSignature of Owner/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ��s �o�h�y *f i 01 Notary (Print) T tC t A vi-�1��Ut jf/ -'lT� My appointment expires' (_):% ch po dc%scn forms plannim-. nto€Ierigtip.duc _ 11T19 1)i What's on your list today?Yodll finditat FredMeyer FRED MEYER STORES • P.O. Box 42121 • Portland, OR 97242-0121.3800 5E 22nd Ave. • Portland, OR 97202-2999. 503 232-8844 • hftp://www.fredmeyer.com May 9, 2008 City of Renton Development Services Division Renton, WA Re: Fred Meyer Fuel Stop �i031 Benson Plaza Land Use & Building Permit Submittals 17801 108"' Avenue SE Renton, WA To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this letter as authorization for Robert McNeill of Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. as an agent for Frcd Meyer Stores; Inc. If you have any questions, please call me at (503) 797-5617. Sincerely. James Coombes Senior Lrititlements Manager Real Estate & Store Development CC:: File Robert McNeill Adam Schatz, Kragen Fred Meyer Facilities Engineering Northwest "Always strive to offer Customers the service, selection, qu and that satisfies them best." Fred G. Meyer, Founder,1886-1978 Fred Meyer Fueling Facility 17733 108'1' Avenue 51:_ Renton WA 98055 Parcel #322305-9016 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I.ot Z of' King County. Boundary Adjustment No. L07L0040. According to the Boundary Line Adjustment Recorded August 22, 2007, Under Recording No. 20070822900006, in King County, Washinaylon_ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING :ITY OF 9ENTON Pre -application meeting for the JUN 18 2008 FRED MEYER FUEL FACILITY RECEIVED PRE 07-114 City of Renton Development Services Division January 17, 2008 Contact information Planner: Andrea Pet7ef (425) 430-7270 Public Works Plan Reviewer. Arneta Henninger (425) 430-7298 Fire Department Reviewer: David Pargas, (425) 430-7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, (425) 430-7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects and contractors who work on the project. Pre-screening: When you have the project ready for submittal, have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre -application meeting is informal and non -binding. l he comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are amended at times, and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of formal project submittal. The information contained in this surrirxiary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). L9 v Y� + + moo) DAIT. TO_ FROM : SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT M E NI ORAN I) [t IVI 1 / 14/08 Andica Petrel, Assistant Planner David Pargas, Assistant fire Marshal Fred Meyer Frieling Facility Review of the plans and material submitted regarding the proposed Fred Meyer Dueling facility has disclosed the following Fire Code requirements that shall need to be niet for this project_ 1. FIRE FLOW: The minimum required Fire floe- for this project shall be: 1500 gallons per rrrincjtc. 2- #I Of HYDRANTS: The minimum number of I lydranis rcclinred for this facility shall be two (2)_ 'fhe number of hydrants is also ,ui)_jcct to meeting installation spacing requirements that are in accordance with sound cogineerirrg practices. 3. HYDRANT SPACING: A) Spacing shall be no greater than 300 tcet apart in for commercial projects. B) Hydrants shall be no greater than 300 feet to the front of the structure. C) One hydrant or the primary hydrant shall not be greater than 150 feet Ec� the main structure_ 4. LADDER & FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: A) The minimurn Fire Apparatus road access shall not be less than 20 feet wide. B) Access shall be provided around the perimeter of the facility and therefore shall meet the Wfoot turning radius_ L5 ' 40ID4 4'e6*51DE (7) Areas Highlighted in Red is where "No Parking Fire Lane" signage may be required.-- 5. FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM: No fire suppression system shall be required for this project. G- DIRE ALARM SYSTEM: No fire alarm system shall be required for this project. T MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL DISPENSING: The Motor Vehicle Duel Dispensing requirements shall comply with Chapter 22 of the 2006 International Fire code and National Fire Protection Association Standard 30-.A. A separate annual inspection and permit to dispense motor vehicle fuel shall be require(]- S. FLAMMABLE & COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID STORAGE: The storage and usage of Flammable an(] Combustible liquid storage shrill comply with Chapter 34 of the 2006 International Dire Code and National Fire Association Standard 30. A separate constriction permit an(] set of -plans shall be required to be suhmittcd tv r",cilu riv,mos''pic0 -114 fFi'dmtrver fueling facilav doc Ad{I1LSticu I,.r„i2 of x DAL- IdAlerno Ifcrc The plains C'Caminer. Contact the Mans Examiner on the specifics of this permll. An anxxuaf inspection and operational per-rnil for_ cacti tairk shall he required ltrr this facility. k 'urrently the City of Menton 0rdimin e does flat allow for the operation of an unatlended facility- ' `!t is possible that fixture adoption of the 2006 lrxternaliorial Fire Code Local amendments inay require back t�powcr for Motor Vehicle Duet Dispensing facilities. I l . PUGET SOUND AIR POLUTION CONTROL & WA. STATE AGRICULTURE: 'rhe requirements set forth by both the Puget Sound Air control and the Washington State Department of AP 'CL111MC shall be inct with the appropriate stamps of approval attached to the dispensers before operations shall be allowed_ 12. MITIGATION FF,ES: No mitigation fees shall be required for this project. r',citvmcnios'pre07-1 14 fredmevU fueling frcilirydoc CITE' OF kvvl—wN- I'1.AN't1'IN(;/Iii I1,DItit;/Pl'fil_1(' WORKS MFIMOItAN1)1"IN7 I )A 1 I J;rnuary 11, 2008 1O ,Andrea Pewul i I IL0M. Arneta tlennrngei XT?98 ��� St11iJI —F' FRED MEYER GAS STATION PREAPPLICATION 07-114 10623 SIB'. CARR RI) NOTE: ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN'rim REPORT The Following comments on development and perrrrilting issues are based on the pre - application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official derision makers (e_g. hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant_ I have completed my review on the Fi-cd Meyer Gas Station preapplication located in Section 32_ Tovvnshrp 23N, Range 5E and have the (t)Ilowilig cornrnents_ WATER: • This site is not in the City of Renton water scr vice boundary. The project site is located irr Soos Creek Water District service area. • The applicant shall apply for a (certificate ot' Water Availability from Soos Creek Water DrStrll:t to confirm that the District can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as required by Rc rilon code • Per the City lire Marshall, the prehmrnary fire flow for this site is I,500 GYM- Any new construction must have one fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM and shall be located within 150 feet of the structure and additionat hydrants (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) -]thin 300 feet of the stricture_ This distance is rrreasured along the travel route_ The number of additional hydrants required is deperident on the calculated fireflow hence if the fireflow remains at 1.500 OPM the n-unimum number of lvdr:rnts required fi)r this facility shall be two. • The existing fire hydrants may need to be fitted with stortz fittings to bring them up to Current City codc- SANITARY SEWER: • The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek sanitary sewer district for availability, fees, plan rcvre,,� and perrnitti- t rc•.t %Ic'irr I X. �alodr �I (.:rr tta • A11Fzoogh thy Soos (dt,trrct will liivc the Iin it rc,icn ;uid as1)1)roti-.d the city still needs to s.rr Ibe r,L,%%cr ON the In.v de.SI n plan. ti'111?EF:T INIPR Otrlh;.ti7l EA'1'S: • 1 t r,ulSportatron Mltr gallon Ice pc'r the H 1-. N.I.mual 11h edition x� Ill be required to be paid Irrrnr 11) issuance of a Cow"tructlon pCrrrtrt_ + J ranSlxfltatltjn is ctrrrelrify re%'ieWrne E13e Site to study t IrL ufatiorl lssucs. I will gel this Inlornratlon topellrer aS soon as possible. I ()ILN'll DRAII4ACE: • A cortc:cplual drainage plan and report is required to be �,ubinrttcd xvith the formal application for the protect • -I he drainage plan is to be deslt,ned per the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. • The Surface Water SDC Bees are $0 405 (but not less than $1-01210) per square foot of rrew_ Impervious area_ Fhcse Ices are collected at the tlnle a construeEron permit is issued. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES All erosion control shall be per the DOF manual. C:FNVItAl - • All required utility, drainage and street ilnprovcrtlents v, ill require separate plan submittals prepared according; to City of Kenton drafting; Standards by a licensed Civil Frigineer. • All plans shall be tied to a rniminum of txvo ofthe City of'Kenlon Horizontal and vertical Control Network. • Permit application rnust include an itemized cost eslirmite for these Improvements. Hall-of-lhc fee must be paid upon applic:atlon for building; and construction permits, and the remainder W11CH the perrnils are Issrred- There may be additional fees for water service related expenses, SeeDrafting Standards. Ck, Kavjm K 11,101C( (i I RI DNIF1 I I,(rCh.( rug r (T1 )' ()[ R .N­F()N !'l�ttu>it1 /13ttililin;?/1'ul�lEr Works �IEhl()RikN 1)I'IA1 OA f l lanuart l"i. 200S I(): I'rc-Application I-ilc JNo I)VL 114 .Andica Pevck Planner (425)4.tcL7270 SUBJECT: Fred :' je-Ner Fueling Facility General We have completed a preliminary mvicw of the pre-ripplicatton fur the above -referenced development proposal. Th,- following corrrrrtents oil &I-e•lopmew amf pornritling issrics arc baved on the pre-tipplication subrnivaA nude to the Ciry Of Keaton 4v dre applictrrrt uncl tire c'Ode's rrr edecr On Me date ref re view. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary nia), be subject to modification anci'or concurrence by official e1ctston-rnakers (e g. Heari ig 1_ xammu. %olimg Adminisiratur. Development Services Director, Public Works Administrator. and Cii% Council)_ Revwu em"xi ms nm'x a&) n"d io he rc� ised based on site planning and other design changes rey fined by Cm start or made b� the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all <applicahle sections of the Renton Municipal Code The Development Regulations are Available for purchase for $50 00 plus ta.x_ from [fie Finance Division on €he first floor of (')tv IJall or on the C'itv's website Ni ,rcnton A a.gov. Projecf llmposai The subject property- is zoned ('onmwiciaf Arterial ((`A), and rs localed at 17925 108A Avenue SC in the Benson Hill :annexation area_ IS underlying parcel is 54,450 SF ( 12.5 acres). The proposal calls for construction of a 4349T (3156 SF) canopy with an S'.x A' ( [ 12 SF) cashwr_s kunsk for a fuclmg lacd t % 'Me project would Include the installation of one 20,000-gallon and one 16.00(i-gallon dual underground gasoline storage tanks. This project would include the det-nditiotn of an e mmy 11000 SU %avant building. .Asphalt, landscaping, new lot lights and utility' coruncc€ions arc ;.also proposed. Development Standard[ , the - Vehicle fueling stations are outright permitted in the ON zone- Min3mrHm 1 _Ql Size_W"Uh and UYWh - There i5 no minrmunl lot size. depth or xvidth requirements in the CA cone There are no mmiictimm on the maximum vmss fluor aria of any single office or corrrinerciai use on a site in the CA zone Lot Swer111 - Maximum building lot coverage No the CA zone alloxvs for 6556 of the total lot area, or 75% it 1mr-Ung is pinn Acd "iWin the bualchng or "Ahn an on - site par kn, garage. Vic proposed conversion would tall info the allox+able lot coNcravc of the CA zone - Building, Standards Buildings are limited to 50 feet in height: the existing building is less than 50 teet and therefore eonimrns re) height requirements. Setback; Sab.achs air rho mnumuru requir-cd distance bet" en the building footprint and the pioperty line. The requued setbacks in the CA zone are 10 Ito m the front ymnL I icd in the rear (require([ be'c,aCnse the prOpeltl is adtacem €o an R& now Ingwrt, t, and zero in the sidr yard_ It appr;irs that this sinicture would rneet the setback re(lurrctncn€., for the ("A noW \I, Lei I urin! f'rr l} tlr.alirt ci'Ifr %Cle.;,,! Po!klnL -- Parking, rcqulrellltWs L,lr\b%- II}e. :A tVp!C;kl 011SItC SV1%h-C'' € m, regiires a iminnium of A and ;i ina.ximus)) o1 0.4 jwkmp sfm"� per IINN Il'C'I of not thmi- aria_ 6men the dine-tliru lr 0mv of dw uY% awl with unly 1 12 SF of kiosk spare. It is hkcla that mw shot bk, iciltmcd fir ~tali 1`edewtrian _1e�_ess 01It code requires it pc'tlrstrlan councction befit a plubllr cutrant-e to the street. in order to provide direct. clear and separate pedestrian walks )ruin sidewalks to filrildring entries and internally fronn buildings to 3butimg retail properties In additum- a We pedesmam ccumeown "imid he required to gel u) the kiosk. If the retail space increases. the parkmp rrcluiremerrts km number of stalls "ill increase as well. Refuse aryl Recycling - for conunercrrf use. refuse and ictvchne colleciron pornts must be on -site. Deposit areas shall be of sufficient cyidth and depth to enclose c()ntainers- and if located Outdoors. aie not allowed to lx located in any required setback or landscape areas. A minimum of t'+W square 100 hir eN cry thousand square feet of building gross floor area OW be provided for recyclable deposit areas (4 square feet) and a minimum 01'4 square feet per 1,001) square feet of building gross Boor area shall be pm, Wed for re We deposit areas (iS square fi cl). Colltctron areas roust he enclosed by a G-foot hence or wall and identified by signs not exceeding Two square feet. A screennre detail must be submitted fern approval alorig with 3 11u11dln,Y permit application. Please see the enclosed refuse recvcline regulations fur further details_ Signs A separate permit is required Or signs. Each indivmWaf business uias have only one sign icir each street frontage of any one of the Allowing types: free-standing, roof. ground. piofectnlg or curnbinatlon_ l-.:ach sign shall not exceed an area greater than € �:>> SI: (Or each lineal foot of"property frontage that the business occupies, up to a rrlaxirnum of'100 Sl-. Wall signs are pernrittecl_ vkrth a total cope arcs not exceeding ?Ol '(,. Sign height limit for heestandlmg. ground. projecting and conibinatrOn signs is 40 feet_ IZoof signs can extend 20 feet over the parapet wall. Additional information on signs is enclos-cd in the prcapphcation pa,:kei I nin dscaping The minimum on -site landscape N idth requirement alone the street frontage is 10 feat. Significatnt landscaping already exists Onsrte, including a rockery- and credit would be given for the cristing land5capling- Any landscaping darnaged during dernolihon and construction NVOLIpd need to be replaced. Critical Areas There is no indication of critical areas onsite. If there is any indication of eiitic,rl area; on the site_ this must be chsCK& io the Oty pi for to Welopmertt and appropriate studies must he undertaken. Consistency with Elie Comprehensive Plan The existing de%clopment is located within the (Wrirerc:ial Con idor iCC) l and f Ise designation. Permit Requirements and Fees l of a p"qw[ 1199 square fee[ or less_ only a bm cling perma is required lWe%er. ctmssuction of a 10,000- Pa11on tact tank triggers Emironmerttal Review- Wch in tw-n triggers 1ldminisoartiye Site Plan Reviev,. Cost mould he Sl _OM) fix Sae Plan Reyreu and $50010 for Pm ironmental Rcyrew . I-J mated review• timetrarrre "(,I d be A - let "eekw Expiratiaii Upon appiuml lnuldmg permits air have been Nawd they arc t a id for six irlont€1, Cti ith an extension available after i1t.;plerlielrl lc IJCIInIII.. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING C17Y OF RF.NTON JUN 18 2008 Project Narrative: RECEIVEL Landscaping, Lot Coverage & Parking Analysis Submitted in Support of an Environmental Review and Administrative Site Plan Review Conducted by the City of Renton, Nyashington Development Services Division Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) .Project Namte/Site Fred Meyer Fueling Facility 17733 108'h Avenue SE, Renton WA 98055 Fred Meyer Store No. 31 BCE No. 13193 Parcel Number 322505-9016 Project Location & ZoninR The project is located at 17733 108`' Avenue SE, Renton WA 98055; the project site is approximately 170- by 175-feet (29,750 square 1cet,.68 acres) and is a small portion of a larger parcel (544,500 square feet/12.5 acres) containing a Fred Meyer retail store and assorted retail commercial uses, within the Benson Plaza Shopping Center. Landscape Analysis This site has been developed in multiple phases over a period of years; combined with multiple outlots under independent ownership, the result is a situation where a lack of accurate records makes it impossible to accurately determine the specific nature and characteristics of €he existing landscaping over the entire area commonly refcrred to as --Benson Plaza.— Therefore. the calculations presented within this section are based on and/or limited to, those portions of the overall site directly owned by Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., as defined by Parcel No. 322305-9016. The project site (.--29,750 square feet) features an extensive rockery as an integral part of the perimeter landscaping, extending along three sides (west, south and east perimeter, the rockery features an abrupt 10- to 12-foot grade separation along the eastern perimeter, gradually descending along the southern edge_ to a flat landscape strip along the western perimeter. The landscaping features a mixture of ground cover, shrubbery and street trees, defining the perimeter and isolating the site from onsite traffic and from the public right-of-way. Excluding the perimeter landscaping and a pair of isolated landscape islands. the praiect site is exclusively covered by impervious surface. Under our proposal,. the only change to the project sites physical attributes may he a slight increase (proiccted at 1,915 square feet) in the arnount of inlper%ious surface due to the loss of landscaping adjoining the existing commercial structure. Some landscaping (--1,050 square feet) will be recouped with the addition of' limited landscaping along the project sites northern perimeter. Parking area/interior landscaping provided will greatly exceed the City's minimum requirements-, nearly 41,000 square feet will be provided versus a requirement of 21,595 square feet (617 spaces provided x 35 square feet). Existing perimeter landscaping will be modified to allow adequate maneuvering room for deliN ery vehicles, using the driveway from 108'h Street; any landscaping removed and/or damaged during the construction phase will be replaced in accordance with our landscaping plan. We do not anticipate the loss of any trees in the perimeter landscape areas due to demolition and/or construction acti\ its-. i ll% niRL rl,,n `;I_P,1 I'Jl\ IP,mricilrai Rug ie%� I ied N1c�cr I ueling I`acila 1_?:,. Ilty" \ienue51 Lot Coverage There will be virtually no change in the ratio of pervious versus impen ions surface: the rmiovaf of landscape islands within the footprint of the for-mcr commercial structure, coupled wlih the addition. -"replacement of slightly less parking landscaping surrounding the proposed fueling facihiv location. results in a net increase of 0.3'in in impervious surface - Lot .• Fred Me er Pre -Development 174,200 Post -Development 174.20a Chan•• --- Schuck'sTuel Facility -k667 3,956 -1.711 1;711 Building Footprints 179,867 178,156 Paved Drives, Parkin &Sidewalks 304,526 308,152 +3,626 Total Impervious Surface 484,393 (89%) 486,308 (893%) +1,91915 Landscaping/ Perimeter 19,274 19,274 --- Landscaping / Interior 40,833 38,918 -1,915 Total Landscaped Surface Total Site 60,107 (11%) tt 58,192 (10.7%) 544,5DO -1,915 -0.4% Parkin Analysis The project site is currently occupied by a vacant commercial structure (--5.667 square feet), along with accessory parking) loading spaces and landscaping. The site was formerty occupied by Schuck's Auto Parts, a retail vendor of motor vehicle parts. This structure will be replaced by a fuel canopy (3,956 square feet) and a cashier-s kiosk (112 square feet. within the canopy footprint) designed to provide shelter and illumination for fuel customers and house fuel facility employees. while controlling stormwater runoff from beneath the canopy. InventoryParking Analysis Current Overall Site 665 Proposed 617 Change -48 Code 593.3 Fred Meyer / Retail Store 605 605 --- 592.3 Schuck's / Fuel Facilit 60 12 -48 1 Parking Breakdown Standard Spaces variable dimensions; 8.5 x 19 or 9 x 24 647 599 (100%) -48 50% Compact Spaces ADA Spaces --- -- --- 50% 12 (29%) ; 18 18 (150%) --- Calculation: The Code Requirement specified for the Fred Mever retail store is calculated using the net floor area (NFA), divided by 100, and then multiplied by a 0.4 parking factor ((NFA%!00) x 0.4 required parking). For the purposes of this calculation, mechanical services, rest rooms and hallways were estimated to total approximately fifteen percent (15%) of the gross floor area; resulting in 148,070 square feet NFA. Using the City•s formula, 592 parking spaces would be required for the retail store, plus 1 space for the fuel facility, with 617 parking spaces or 104% of the requirement, the proposed parking inventory fully complies with the City of Renton's parking requirements. No compact spaces exist within the parking inventory. ADA parking provided (18 spaces) also exceeds requirements (12). DEVELOPMENT Pi." ITy OF 9E�' Construction Mitigation Narrative AN 18 Z'. Submitted in Support of an Environmental Review and .RE ED`, Administrative Site Plan Reyici !E Conducted by the Cite of Renton, Washington Development Services Division Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) Proiect Name/Site Fred Meyer Fueling Facility 17733 108'" avenue SE, Renton WA 98055 Fred Meier Stare No. 31 BCE 413193 Parcel Number322505-9016 Construction. Schedule: Assuming the plan review process proceeds normally, construction of the fueling facility is anticipated to begin on or about August 2008. With construction of similar facilities historically requiring approximately eight (8) to ten (10) weeks. and allowing for contingencies, we anticipate construction will conclude on or about October 31, 2008. I Iours of Operation: following a traditional workday schedule, construction is expected to commence no earlier than 7:00 AM and conclude no later than 5:00 PM. No construction activity will be required on Saturdays. Sundays or holidays. Adequate parking is available onsite for construction workers. 1-lauling,'I`ransportation Routes: Vehicles and equipment involved in the demolition and construction phases of the project will be required to utilize adjacent public rights -of -way, specifically State Highway 515. commonly referred to as 108"' ,Avenue SE, andr'or 176"' Street SE, commonly referred to as Carr Road, `then en route to or from the construction site. The use of interior drive aisles and existing driveways to access these two principal arterials will eliminate the need for construction -related traffic on adjacent collector rights -of -way. OnsAe Mitigation Measures: Specific mitigation measures are discussed in specific detail in the SEPA Checklist, but a general summary of possible impacts and proposed mitigation is presented in the table below: Impact Mitigation A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan {TESL') will be implemented to Erosion & Sedimentation manage storn-t ater runoff, beginning with demolition of the existing structure and concluding upon the completion of the project, or the potential for erosion has passed. Light & Glare No liOht or glare is expected to occur as a result of construction activity Existing driveways drive aisles arid parking, aisles will be utilized to provide access to Access the site Construction equipment and vehicles will be restricted to the use of adjacent principal arterials, 108"' Street SE and Carr road to access the site. [ in nC Rcnlnn SI FA I.nti irc,itmrrlJl Ro u'+ Fred Nluc ui Iacdki 17, ', I�, ALenuc M. The impacts of emissions upon air quality are expected to be minimal, emanating from construction equipment initially, and later, on a more permanent basis, from future vehicle traffic. These impacts are mitigated through efficient design of the facility, the number of fueling positions, adequate vehicle queuing and overall site circulation. Air Quality State-of-the-art vapor recovery equipment will work to recapture -contain escaping vapors throughout the fuel delivery system. Minimal levels of airbonie dust particles may be realized during the excavation filling processes accompanying construction. These impacts will be addressed by the TESL. Erosion controls will be maintained throughout construction in accordance with the provisions of the TESL plan. Stonnwater runoff will be collected and discharged to Stormwater the existing stormwater system, at the existing point of discharge; located in the 108" Street right-of-way. Once the facility becomes operational, onsite stormwater management proposes to separate under -canopy runoff, pre -treat with an oil/water separator and then} be discharged into the sanitary sewer. Short-term sources of noise pollution will originate from the use of construction cquipmcnt and will vary in their frequency and intensity. Maximum noise levels can Noise typically be expected to range between 72- to 90-decibels, as measured from a distance of 50-feet away from the source. These impacts will be of limited duration and mitigated, to the extent possible, tlarouglt the use and maintenance of efficient mufflers and noise abatement devices on construction vehicles and equipment. Traffic Control Plan: Given the sites relatively isolated location within the Benson Plaza center, and the use of existing driveways and principal arterials for access. we do not anticipate any traffic impacts to be generated by the construction of the fueling facility. Following best management practices associated with construction sites, the site will be fenced as a security and safety measure during both demolition and construction phases. Parking for construction workers and equipment will be contained within the sites parkins areas. We expect minimal parkins disruption for adjacent commercial use,;. 40 13EVELt_?PkIE�D PLANNING Ci7Y {DF RPNTON JUN 18 2008 Project Narrative RECEIVED Submitted in Support of an Environmental Reviev* and Administrative Site Plan Review Conducted by the City of Renton, Washington Development Services Division Under the Auspices of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) Project Name/Site Fred Meer Fueling Facility 17733 108`" Avenue SE, Renton NVA 98055 Fred Meyer Store No. 31 BCE No. 13193 Parcel Number 322505-9016 Proicct Location: The project is located at 17733 108"' Avenue SE, Renton WA 98055; the project site is approximately 170- by 175-feet (29,750 square feet) and is a small portion of a larger parcel (544.500 square feet: 12.5 acres) containing a Fred Meyer retail store and assorted retail commercial uses, within the Henson Plaza Shopping Center. _Re uired Permits- The protect will require a SE PA Environmental Review due to the installation of underground storage tanks (UST), Under City of Renton code. St PA review subsequently triggers the requirement i6r Administrative Site Plan Review. The project will also require the issuance of a demolition permit to demolish the vacant structure, building Permits (including electrical, mechanical and plumbing), fire engineering permits (including LIST installation and tank permits), grading permit, and sign permit (including related electrical permits) — all from the City of Renton. The project will also require numerous peripheral permits be issued and/or licenses obtained from the Puget Sound Clcari Air Authority (PSCAA), the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (DL&1) and the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE), as well as utility connection permits from the Soos Creels Water and Sewer District (water and sewer). The City of Renton also reserves the right to inspect and approve all utility connections/plans undertaken in conjunction with this project. Zonint;'I'lan pesi nation: The site is currently zoned CA, Commercial Arterial and is designated as CC, Commercial Corridor Land Use by the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding properties are also zoned CA and contain a variety of traditional retail uses. No changes in zoning are being requested under this proposal. Existinp- Use and 1_mpro,,ements: The site is currently occupied by a vacant commercial structure. with parking space and landscaping; the site was formerly occupied by Schuck's Auto Parts, a retail vendor of motor vehicle parts. The site is served by an adjacent access driveway from 108"' Street; but a perimeter landscape strip physically isolates the site from the driveway; requiring automobile traffic to access the site using interior parking aisles. Direct access to 108,11 Street is not available and is not sought under this proposal. The site features an extensive rockery as an integral part of the perimeter landscaping. Extending alotlg three sides (west, south and east perimeter, the rockery features an abrupt 10- to 12-foot grade separation along the eastern perimeter. gradually descending along the southern edge, to a flat landscape strip along L �I P,1 Incironnu-nt;�l Rc�ic�� I reii ti1�.er I u�lin_� F2ciltl� I� i11 "-1.cnucSI the western perimeter. the landscaping features a mixture of ground cover, shrubbery and street trees; defining the perimeter and isolating the site from onsite traffic and from the public right-of-way. Site Features: Aside from the grade separation along the eastern perimeter, the site is essentially flat, with an extremely slight slope from east to west. Excluding the petirneler landscaping and a pair of isolated landscape islands- the site is exclusively covered by impervious surface. Under our proposal, the only change to the sites physical attributes may be a slight increase (projected to be less than 1 %) in the amount of' impervious surface due to the loss of landscape islands adjacent to the existing vacant structure. Some pervious surface will be recouped by landscaping added to the northern perimeter. Soil Classification: Soils onsite have been classified as Alderwood, a gravcll_v, sandy learn, by the Soil Conservation Service Maps of King County. There is no known history of soil instability in the immediate vicinity and no known agricultural sails or prime farmlands are located onsite. A complete geotechnical report will be submitted as part of the building permit/plan review process. Proposed Use and Improvements: .After demolishing the vacant structure currently occupying the si€e, Fred Meyer proposes to construct a state-of-the-art retail fueling facility, comprised of a 43- by 92- foot fuel canopy (3.956 square feet) and, an 8- by t440ot cashier's kiosk (112 square feet), with live (5) multi -product dispensers, creating ten (10) fueling positions. "Ihe facility will be of Type 11-B Construction and Class M Occupancy, as defined by the 2006 International Building Code (IBC). The project will require the installation of two (2) underground storage tanks (one 20,000-gallon regulariunleaded tank and one 16,000-gallon dual tank (8,0001,'8,000) for storage of diesel and super unleaded fuels. Other associated site improvements will include wall -mounted signage, minor parking and/or paving modifications, the installation of some additional landscaping, new lot lights and any necessary utility connections. Anticipating the passage of code revisions authorizing unattended operation, the facility will be designed to be fully automated, allowing for continuous operation. 24-hours per day seven (7) days per week. Until such revisions become law, the facility's hours of" operation will coincide with the existing Fred Meyer retail store, open for business from 7:00 AM until 1 1:00 PM. An attendant will be onsite, located in the cashier's kiosk; executing cash payments ardor credit card transactions, monitoring payment -at - the -pump, while constantly observing the fuel facility. Regardless of operational status, the facility will be rernotely supervised via security cameras and an alarm system, designed to become operational in the event of emergencies such as fire detection or breach of the inner/outer walls of the tanks or fuel distribution system. Refusc recycling collection containers will be available onsite; however the facility will utilize reruseirecycling storage and compaction facilities within the Fred Mever retail store for disposal and collection purposes. Access: The site does not have direct access to adjacent public rights -of -way. Customer traffic will utilize existing driveways, drive aisles and parking aisles to access the site. No new driveways or means of vehicular ingress/egress are proposed. Traffic and Trip Generation: Using traditional trip generation methodology established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), supplemented by studies commissioned by Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., the traffic impacts associated with a new Fred. Meyer fueling facility are expected to be nominal. Based on ITE's methodology, the project will generate an average of 1,686 total trips and an average of452 net new trips on a typical weekday. ( iry nr P'nron M PA I ❑ imnmcntol Kra. ic�1 I reel Atcccr I uclinc I aclhi€ lil,1` lt'flu, SI_ The Citv of Kcnton has acknowledged that a large percentage of bred Meycr fuel facility custorners are drawn from internally captured, pass -by and diverted link trips, as opposed to new trips generated by the facility alone; ureatly reducing the number of new trips attributable to the facility. Consequently, the City has awarded a credit of 70% against the total number of trips generated; reducing the projected trip generation to a more realistic 506 total trips. The proiect will proyidc $37.935 in traffic impact fees to the City of Denton. Proposed Off -Site Improvements: No off -site improvements sire anticipated in conjunction with this proposal and no property dedications are necessary. Existing landscaping may he slightly modified to allow adequate maneuvering room for delivery vehicles, using the drivewav from 100 Street, any landscaping removed and/or damaged during the construction phase will be replaced on a one -for -one basis. We do not anticipate the loss of any trees in the perimeter landscape areas due to demolition and./or construction activity_ With no as -built landscape plan in existence, a record draining has been compiled to document existing landscaping. The 108"' Street drivewav modification may necessitate the relocation of a fire hydrant, currently located within the landscape strip at the sites SVl' corner. With a new location closer to the fuel canopy, this movement will improve access for firefighters. All hydrants serving the site will be upgraded to current Renton standards for fittings. Dire lanes will be identified in accordance with City of -Renton standards_ Construction Cost: The construction costs provided are estimated and are subject to change; not included in these figures are sub -consultant costs (title. geotechnical, traffic, etc.). Preliminary Site Work r Construction Cost Estimate Demolition and Erosion Control S 51,000 Farthwork S 26,400 Site Work S 48,200 Storm Drainage S 15.750 Sewer and Water $ 5,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost S 146.380 Permit and Utility Fees $ 48,000 Planning and Engineerirrg S 60,000 Total $ 254,380 Market Value of Project_ To be determined. F.-III/Excavation Materials: Typically, construction of this type of facility requires the removal of as much as 1,200 cubic yards of material, including asphalt and subsurface soils, during the installation of the underground storage tanks and the excavation necessary for the construction of footings and foundations. If the excavated material cannot be utilized onsite, it will be exported to an approved offsite location. Clean suitable structural fill will be imported from an approved source, if necessary. T city of Renton 'w, DEVELOPMENT PLi# ING TREE RETENTION cln 011ENTC J U N 18 2008 WORKSHEET aeeeive 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter' on project site: 1. f� trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 d trees Trees in proposed public streets Q trees Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts D trees Trees in critical areas3 and buffers trees Total number of excluded trees: 2- Q trees 3- Subtract line 2 from line 1: 1 A2 trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, RA or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0-05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. • 50 trees 5- List the number of fit' or larger trees that you are proposing5 to retain 4: 5. trees 6- Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: 6. "` trees (If tine 6 is less than zero, stop here- No replacement trees are required). 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7- inches 8- Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: (Minimum 2" caliper trees required) 8. Inches per tree 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees6: (it remainder is 5 or greater, round up to the next whale number) 9. _ trees Measured at chest height. ' Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified a[borist, and approved by the City_ 0 Crilical Areas, suc:li as w0ands, streams, ftoodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). 4 Count only those trees to he retained outside of critical areas arxt buffers. The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-13OH7a e, Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that ate less than 6" but are greater than 2' (;an be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. I1.Divtsion Fornts:leeeRetendonWorksh(�et I U07 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 -166- t la.... FJ fa* Floor Plans a AND a Irrigation Plan 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual,; Landscape P.1an,:0 taile:da Legal Description, This requirement may be waived by. 1 Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: j t �' f DATE: DEVELOPMEN7 PLANNING CITY OF= raFNTON J U N 18 2008 gEEIVEC O.' WFB%PUV1DEVSFRVkForrnslr?lannirig�waivero[subrnitlairags 9-06AS 09106 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1 � I. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 2_ Public Works Plan Review Section 1 1� 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section WwEmPWDEVSERV1ForTtas\Planning%waiverofsubmittairegs_"6.x1s 09106 PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Planning Division DEV L.OPMENT PLANNING 1055 Soulh Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 ^ITY OF PFNTON Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 J U N i 8 2006 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: ��yy �r The State Environmental Policy Act (5EPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental g ci 0 consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations- Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMFNTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJE=CT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies; plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively_ 13143 (?U2.doc S - 02/08 A 1. 2. 3. BACKGROUND !Name of proposed project. J -ipplicable Fred Meycr Fueling I7acility (Name of applicant. Fred Meyer Store,,. Inc. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: �plrcurel James Coornbes Senior Entitlements Manager Real Estatc and Store Development Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. 3800 S.E. 22nd Avenue Portland OR 97202 Plione: (503) 797-5617 Fax: (503)797-3539 4- Date checklist prepared: May 30, 2008 5- 6. 7 ip 3 Agency requesting checklist: C o171CM-1 PO -SOIL Robert McNeil) Senior Planner Barghauscn Consultinc Engineers, Inc. 18215 - 72nd Avenue South Kent WA 98032 Office: (425) 251-6222, ex 1061 Fax: 025) 251-8782 City of Renton, Development Services Division, Development and Planning Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)_ Fueling facility construction is scheduled to begin on or about September 1, 2008, with completion tentatively scheduled for October 31, 2008- Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Tberc are no other plans for future additions, expansions, and/or further activity related to this project. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal A geotechnical report is included -with this submittal presenting an analysis of the suitability of soil conditions relative to the proposed facility and making recommendations for footings, foundations, and subgrade preparation, includinb excavation} for UST installation. In addition, a boundary and topographical survey has been prepared for the project site and is availablc for review. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. To the best of our knowledge, there are no pending applications directly affecting the subject propert y- 13 t 93.002.doc - 2 - 02108 10 l ist any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The: list belo4v details approvals and -or permits needed to complete this project: 007 of Renion • Demolition Permit • Asbeslos Surzcv • SETA Environmenlal Revie«- • Administrative Site Plan Review • Building Permit • Mechanical, Electrical. and Plumbing Permits • Utility Connection Rei,iew.,Appro',aIs • Sewer Capping(ifnecessary) • Business License (additional. if necessary) • Dire Engineering Permits (USTs. fuel disiribution) • Sign Permits • Grading, Right -of -Way Use Permits (if necessary) • Certificate of Transportation Concurrency (provided by King County) .S'oos Creek Water & Sewer -District • Certificates of Availability (waler and sewer) • Utility Connection Approvals ,OXiet Sound CTeati Air11irthw-ity • "Notice of Intent to Demolish" for demolition of existing structures • "Notice of Construction and Approval-. for new fueling facility Washin tonAiateDepartnrent of EcologyD_DF.1 • Tank Installation Washingla7 State Departnrenr �t"Licerasirr�_LflL� • 'Tank .Licenses Washinton Styre Department of l.ahor arrd lndrrstries (DLL • Electrical Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The initial phase of the project calls for the demolition of the existing commercial structure located on -site; a former Schuck's Auto Parts retail store, approximately 5,675 square feet, along with paved parking/loading areas and landscaping immediately adjacent to the building, totaling an estimated 10,000 square feet. The existing perimeter landscaping (rockery and landscape islands within the parking area) will remain substantially intact. The construction phase calls for the construction of Fred Mever Fueling Facility with a 43- by 92-foot fuel canopy (3956 square feet) and an 8- by 14-foot cashier's kiosk (112 square feet). The facility will have five (5) multi -product dispensers (MPDs); creating ten (10) fueling positions. The facility will be of Type I1-B Constriction and (.'lass M Occupancy, as defined by the 2006 International Building Code (111C). 13193.002 _doe - 3 - 02108 The protect also includes the installation of one (1) 20.000-gallon { unleaded fuel) and one (1 ) I6.000-Calton dual lank (8.000i8,000 -allons, supreme unleadedidieseI ft:el) undcreround siora�ic tanks (US"] s). OCher associated site improvements associated with a typical I -zed Mcvcr fue)11111 faeility iuclude asphalt paving. new lot lights, wall-inounled signs_ landscape upvrades (integraicd within the existing landscape plan), and required utility conneclions,uhgrades. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section. township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map. if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate reaps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located in Section 32_ Township 23. Ranee 05, on a portion of Parcel No. 322305-9016, commonly referred to as 17733 - 108th Avenue S.E., in the City of Renton, Washington. The fueling facility is immediately adjacent to 108th Avenue and located on the same parcel as the Fred Meyer retail store, in a shopping center commonly referred to as Benson Plaza. Legal Descr-i pion 1,01" Z OF KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINT: ADJUSTMENT NO. 1.071-0040, ACCORDING TO THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED AUGUS"1' 22. 2007, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070822900006, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); la , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The project site is essentially flat, with a slight slope from east to wcsi. There is a grade separation of approximately 10- to 12-feet on the eastern perimeter of the site, elevating the 108th Avenue S.E. right-of-way above the fueling facility site-, however, aside from potential utility connections, this separation should not impact the development of a fueling facility on site. C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example: clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Soil Conservation Service Maps for King County, soils found on -site are classified as Alderwood, consisting primarily of a gravelly, sandy loam. There are no known agricultural soils and/or prime farmland located on site- d- Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. To the best of our knowledge, there is no known history of soil instability in the immediate vicinity of the project site. 13193.002 10C - 4 - 02108 e Describe the purpose, type. and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fW. Approximately 1-200 to 1,500 cubic yards of material (asphalt and subsurface soils) is likely to be removed fi-om the site during the installation of new USTs and the necessary excavation for footings and foundations. "the raterial will be exported to an approved location off -site, if it cannot be utilized as fill on -site. Should additional fill be needed. clean suitable structural fill will be imported from an approved source Shoring of the tank pit may be required to stabilize the soil during UST installation. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so. generally describe. FTOSlon is possible, but not likely, during the earthwork phase of consinrction, particularly during wet weather. The amount and/or degree of erosion is not expected to be significant due to the presence of the existing impervious surface and the essentially flat topography_ g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? AIR "'Ith the exception of existing landscaped areas/islands, the projecl site is completely covered with impervious surface. Depending on the requirements of the site plan for this pailicular fueling facility, there may be a slight deviation in the percentage of impervious surface versus landscaping due to minor changes in the overall Iandscape plan Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Any measures to reduce or control erosion and sedimentation will be specified in a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed to fully comply with the standards and specifications of the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) 1990 Stormwater Design Manual, and shall be consistent with the best management practices (BMPs) recommended by DOE, as well as mecliDg 111c requirements set forth by the City of Renton during the plan review process. Typically, erosion and sedimentation control begins with the excavation for UST installation and continues throughout the construction phase: concluding only when the project is completed and/or the potential for erosion has passed. Due to the existing level of impervious surface and a limited area for excavation, controls are likely to be limited to the use of' sandbags to divert storrnwater to catch basins- which will be provided with inlet protection. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known The construction of a Fred Meyer fueling facility is not expected to significantly impact existing air quality- Primary air quality impacts will be related to initial construction activities. future vehicle traffic, and facility operations. The project may slightly increase minor, localized emissions; both temporarily and on a more permanent basis. During the projecl's construction phase, exhaust from construction vehicles and/or equipment utilizing gasoline and/or diesel fuels will produce a temporary increase in emission levels. A minimal increase in the amount of airborne dust and/or particulate t 3 i 93.6o2.doc - 5 - 02l08 matter is also anticipated: primarily during the excavation. falling and �_,radin phases of cernstructron. These temporary increases are not expected to have long -teen impacts on the project site err adjaccnt properties. Once construction is complete, the fueling facility will produce localized emissions on a more comiouin'., basis_ consisting primarily of vehicle exhaust from deli�ury trucks and customers- vehicles. and from the facility itself_ These emissions will include suspended particles, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur oxides (SOX), volatile organic con1pounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons. and other typical pollutants. Any potential increase in emissions is mitigated by the increased efficiency of the fueling facility's design. The number of fueling positions created, the provision of an adequate queuing area and the overall design of an effective circulation plait will improve access to fueling positions, reduce engine idling, and shorten the average time, per transaction for customers seeking to refuel. Are there any off -site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Off -site emissions and/or odors which may affect the project site are likely to originate from the exhaust emissions of motor vehicles traveling on adjacent public/private rights -of -way. We do not anticipate any impacts to our project - Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The `I HSCP will provide details on measures taken to minimize airborne dust and particulate matter generated during the projecl's construction phase (see Section 1II). Excessive vehicle and/or equipment emissions are typically controlled and/or limited through factory -installed suppressants on constntction equipment (i.e.. mufflers and spark arresters), To minimize potential impacts after construction is completed, a California Air Resources Board (GARB) -certified Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORVR) compatible balanced Stage 11 vapor recovery system will be installed at each MPD; reducing vapor released to the air during the refueling process. The UST installation process will feature a CARB-certified Stage 1, dual -point vapor recovery system utilized at the USTs; reducing the amount of vapor released to the air during the off-loading of product from fuel delivery trucks. WATER a, Surface Water: 1) is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. It appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No surface water body is located in the immediate vicinity of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters` If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Does not apply. M93.002 Joc - 5- 02JUB 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site thal would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Doc,; not apply. 4) Wili the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description. purpose. and approximate quantities if known The project will not require withdrawal or diversion of surface water. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan_ The project site does not lie within a mapped floodplain, according to the federal 1=mergency Management Agency (J=EMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). Community Panel No. 53033(:0979F. revised May 16, 1995. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. With the exception of- a proposed connection to the oil -site sanilary sewer system for Convevance of stormwater runoff collected from the concrete slab under the canopy, the project does not include changes to the existing on -site storm drainage collection system. Stormwater from other impervious surface areas on -site will continue to be collected through a series of catch basins and pipes, and then conveyed to an existing off -site point of discharge; located in the public right-of-way- This point of discharge will not be modified by the project. Since the project area will continue to be subjected to vehicle maneuvering, we do not anticipate a substamial increase in the potential for unexpended hydrocarbons and/or motor oils to be conveyed through this stormwater system. Minor amounts of solid waste will be collected in receptacle bins located at various locations throughout the fueling facility, and disposed of, using the trash compaction Iacilities provided by the Fred Mever retail store, b. Ground Water. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater withdrawal is expected and no water will be discharged into groundwater by this project. During conslruction, the presence of high groundwater may trigger the need to dewater during excavation for the canopy column footings ancVor the UST installation. Given the highly variable nature of this occurrence, the approximate quantities of groundwater which may be withdrawn, cannot be ascertained at this time. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chernicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systems) are expected to serve. In past years, various structures on the project site were connected to the sanitary sewer system in Coll] unchorl with different types of commercial development. Subject to future 13193.002.doc - 7 - 02/08 inspection and confirmation rer7ardinL). the condition and suiiabi)ily of existing conncetlorts. this project proposes to utilifr those connections. or provide neu- Cunricctions as ncccssarv_ to fully comply w ith current standards. Consequently. there will be no discharge of waste material into the ground associated with this project. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Stomiwalcr runoff will occur from the canopy-s roof, frorn impervious surfaces typically used for vehicle maneuvering- and lesser amounts for areas beneath the canopy and landscaping. Construction of the fueling facility will not significantly change the existing percenlape of impervious surface, and thus, not drastically affect the amount of stormwater runoff entering 1he stormwater system. Siorrnwaler ntnotf from beneath the canopy will be pre-Ireated with an oil/water separator. prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. Stormwater runoff from other imperious surfaces on -site. will continue to be collected and discharged to the stormwater systcrm at the cxisirnp point of discharge- located in the public right-ofway. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Should a fuel spill or sirrrilar type of accident occur, it is possible waste materials could enter groundwater. Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil and other unspent hydrocarbons from the area beneath the canopy and/or vehicle maneuvering areas. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The Fred Mever fueling facility will implement measures to reduce and/or control potential impacts to surface water, groundwater and/or stormwater runoff in full compliance with the standards and specifications set forth in the 1990 DOE Stormwater Design Manual and/or jurisdictional standards, as required by the City of Renton. Said measures will include ongoing maintenance of the existing storm sewer system and continued Unplcinentation of a hazardous materials spill control plan and other design and/or operational protocols: described in greater detail in Section r37, Environmental Health. In addition, the TESC P will address temporary erosion and/or sedimentation controls during the construction process (scc Section I for details). 4. PLAINTS Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, rnaple, aspen, other �- evergreen tree: ©i , cedar, pine, other shrubs -� grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, buhrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation 13193.692.doc - B - 02108 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will he rernoved or altered? Nk'iih reference to the site plan provided. conslrnction of the fueling facility snav necessitate the removal and or reconfigtiration c4 existint-, ]andscaping_ however, inhere possibEe, an etltsa] anxxlnt of landscapint w 11 he restored and/or replaced in a manner consistent with vegetation already on -site_ anti fully integraiin- changes and/or additions into the existing landscape plan. mcludin= irrrration systems. The rockery/retaining wall, a key element in the grade separation_ will be retained under the proposed Project- C . List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To the best or our knowledge, no threatened and/or endangered species of plants are located on, or near, the project site- d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: If pecessary, additional on -site landscaping - trees, plants and ground cover - will complement the existing vegetation, and be consistent with species native to the Pacific Northwest; well -suited to the climate and further enhancim, the visual aesthetics on site. 5. ANIMALS a_ Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, iothe Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. To the hest or our knowledge, no threatened and/or endangered species are either located on, or near, the project site. C. is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The project site lies within the Pacific flyway; a migratory route for waterfowl_ d_ Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The provision of additional and/or improved landscape areas may provide a limited habitat for small birds and/or mammals. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a_ What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The fueling facility will use electrical energy for heming/ventilalion (cashier's kiosk). lighting and the operation of mechanical equipment_ 13193-002 duc - 9 - 02108 b. Would your project affect the potential use of soiar energy by adjacent properlics? If so. generally describe. The project is not expected to interfere xith the potential use of solar energy on adj<rcenl properties: primarifv due to the projects low physical prone an&or 1u11 compliance with existlnr setback requirements. G. What kinds of energy conservation features are inrlUded in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any The cashier's kiosk will fully comply with all applicable energy ccrnsenation and/or building code standards issued by Washington State and the ('ity of Renton. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste. that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe, Potentialenvironmental health hazards would include exposure to l,,asohne during the refueling process, the risk of fire due to the presence of flammable materials- and the accidental contamination of the environment througlr the r-clease of fuel from the USTs. the Biel distribution system, and/or the IIVUs. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Public safety units (i.c., police, fire and/or paramedics) would typically respond to the types of emergency situations which might occur during the construction and/or operation of the fueling facility. The facility's projected demand for these services is expected to be minimal; consistent with that of comparable developments of this type and size. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Successful efforts to control and reduce the potential for environmental health and safely hazards are rooted in four (4) operational concepts: • Proper maintenance of equipment and/or operational components/features; • Adherence to best management practices (BMPs), developed by petroleum and safety professionals and organizations; • Implemenlation of strict procedural guidelines: fully compliant Nvith OSHA standards: arid, • Following the manufacturer's suggested installation practices Some specific examples of the ways in which Fred Meyer fueling facilities respond to these concepts, include, but are not limited to, the following: • Providing emergency shutoff switches and fire extinguishers in easily accessible locations on -site, in accordance with standards prescribed by the International Fire Code and municipal jurisdictions; • Using double -containment construction techniques for USTs and the filet distribution system, featuring double -walled fiberglass materials which provide exceptional protection against catastrophic rupture or leakage while preverrlinp 13193,002,doc - 10 - 02108 corrosive deterioration of UST wails and subsequcrsl contan)ination of surrounding soil; • Providing interstitial monitornrg of the UST inner nulls grid undcr,, rotjnd pipiu�, comprising the fuel distribution system - detectn), possible leaks and immediately notifying the facility operator and ensuring the immediate shutd0wr3 of those portions of the fuel distribution system experiencing Ieakave. • Testing the integrity of the underground fuel distribution systent throughout the installation process, rising the manufacturer-s recommended tools and techniques (including pressure tests) to verify full compliance will) DOE standards; enabling the identification, isolation and correction of problems prior to filling the tank excavation and paving the site; • Installing primary and secondary containment equipment and spill -prevention features, including overfill prevention (OPW automatic shutoff drop tube risers). gravity return of undispensed product, flex joints at the USTs and breakaway impact valves at the MPDs; • Utilizing CARB-certified Stage 1 and Stage II vapor recovery systems to reduce the amount of fuel vapor released during the delivery process (Stage 1) and refueling process (Stage II); • Conducting ongoing training of delivery truck drivers in emergency procedures- providing training in the safe transport and delivery of fuel, as well as fuel -containment procedures, in the event of an accidental spill or leak: • Training fueling facility operators in emergency procedures- assuring their proficiency with on -site hazardous spill prevention plans and techniques and in the use of clean-up kits designed for this fueling facility-, • Providing back-up power generation capability, complying with the provisions of the 2006 International fire Code, subject to the passage of code amendments by the City of Renton; enabling the facility to continue providing energy to fuel other generators during power outages; • Operating the facility as an attended facility, during the regular business hours kept by the Fred Meyer retail store, and if/when eventually permitted under Renton code, providing operation as an unattended. but remotely-supenised facility; using security cameras and electronic monitoring to provide surveillance around the clock-, and, • Providing a 24-hour alarm system at all times, regardless of operational mode; protecting against fire, detection./breach of the inner/outer WAS of the USTs and fuel distribution system; the alarm is sounded inside the store- to An the store director and staff, and via modem, at the corporate offices of Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., inhere immediate confirmation of the nature of the emergency can occur and the appropriate response determined- b- Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Motor vehicle Iraffic is the predominant source of ambient noise from the surrounding area, but it is not expected to affect the project in any way. W93.002-doc - 11 02108 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis f€or example_ traffic, construction. operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site - Shore -term sources of noise pollution will/ruay nriginatc from the use of construction equipment and will likely vary in both frequency and intensity. We anticipate maximum noise levels to fall within a range of 72- to 90-decibels, as measured from n poini.'distante ol)no less than 50-feet away from the noise -generating source. Aside frorn minimal noise levels generated by automobile and truck traffic and occasional use of' maintenance equipment, virtually indistinguishable from existing sources of ambient noise, no long-term sources of noise pollution are associated with this project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Noise impacts associated with construction will be of limited duration and mitigated, to the greatest extent possible, through the use and maintenance of efficient mufflers and noise -suppression devices on construction vehicles and equipment. No long-term mitigation measures arc proposed, due to the lack of long-term impacts related to noise levels generated on -site, which are anticipated to be consistent with those of adjacent commercial properties. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project site is currently occupied by an abandoned commercial structure (estimated at 5,675 square feet), paved parking/loading areas and landscaping, totaling an estimated 10,000 square feel. Surrounding land uses include: To the North: COrnrnercial uses and parking space To the South: Access driveway and abutting commercial uses To the East: 1081h Avenue S.E. and abutting commercial uses To the West: Commercial uses (Fred Meyer retail store) and parking space b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. To the best of our knowledge, the project site has not been used for agriculture. C. Describe any structures on the site. An abandoned, vacant commercial structure currently occupies the site, along with related parking/loading space and landscaped areas. The structure was formerly home to Schuck's Auto Parts and is approximately 5,675 square feet. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The project calls for the demolition of the vacant commercial structure and the razing of existing landscape islands in the site-s interior, while preserving as much of the perimeter landscaping as possible - including the rockery/retaining wall. t a t 93 002.doc - t 2- 02/08 e What is the current zoning classification of the site? '1 he proiuct site. recently annexed to the City of Renton. is currently designated as CA, Commercial Arterial. under the applicable provisions of the City of Renton Zoning Ordinance. f_ What is the currenl comprehensive plan designation of the site? The pr oieci site is currently designated as CA. Commercial Arterial, under the applicable provisions of the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan. g. If applicable- what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. tr. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? if so, specify. 7o the best of' our knowledge, the project site has not been classified as an --cnvironmentally sensitive" area by any jurisdiction. i_ Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Fred Mcycr fueling facilities typically feature a single attendant, working from the cashier's kiosk: rnordionng the facility and completing transactions- There is no residentiat use associated with this project. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Given the nature of the proposed use and current uses on the project site, there will be no cornmercial and/or residential displacement associated with this project. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: No displacement is associated with this project, therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed - I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Fred Meyer fueling facilities typically function as an accessory use; in this case, to the Fred Meyer retail store located in the Benson Plaza Shopping Center. This relationship implies a shared customer base with all adjacent retail, service -based and other - non -residential uses. The facility has been designed and constructed in a manner which reinforces this mutually -supportive, cooperative relationship and eliminates or mininrires any negative impacts to surrounding properties. Typical of this effort is the degree to "x.hich on -site circulation/traffic, landscaping, lighting and parking improvements are fully integrated into existing plans. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Given the nature of the proposed use, there is no residential component associated with this project 13143-4r02.doc 13 - 02/08 b. Approximately how many units, if any. would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle. or IOW -income housing. Does not apply. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: Does not alaplNz. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed. Subject to local code requirements, the typical Fred Meyer fueling facility features a canopy height of approximately 14 feet, with a minimal clearance beneath the canopy of 15.5 meet. The canopy and supporting columns are typically constructed of metal. The standard Fred Meyer sir n ige plan does not include additional free-standing signs (pole/pylon); price pads are either affixed to an existing free-standing sign, or located on opposite canopy facades. with corporate logos and/or text affixed to both the canopy and cashiers kiosk: please refer to the site plan for precise sign locations proposed for this project_ b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Due to the low profile of our canopy structure and full compliance with required setbacks, we do not foresee any views being substantially altered or obstructed. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The typical Fred Meyer fueling facility is designed to complement, not clash with aesthetic elements alreadv on -site; therefore no mitigation measures are proposed. The corporate colors, logos and minimal signage levels are selected and placed to provide a visual link with the existing Fred Meyer retail operation. Every effort is made to fully integrate any proposed improvements with existing improvements. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? During the construction phase. no light or glare is anticipated due to the limiting of construction activity to daylight hours. Once the fueling laciiit)r becomes operational, any light or glare connected with said operation will likely originate from lighting fixtures located beneath the fuel canopy, lot lights, illuminated signage and the headlights of customer and delivery vehicles, entering and exiting the facility_ This condition can reasonably be expected to primarily manifest itself during the evening hours and in the winter months, during the late afternoon as well. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? To the best of our knowledge, we do not anticipate light and/or glare related to the fueling facility's operation to create safety hazards, interfere with and/or obsiruct views. 13193.002.doc - 14 - 02/08 0 This particular project Will be11e1,I Iron, the txis11nt3 2.radc separation along the 108th .Avenue S.E. right -of %k iy: canopy lighting wJ11 he suhstantially beneath street lcvcl, further reducim! spillover. while eliminatis12 �131V potential for vita° blockage or obstruction_ C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Likely sources of off site light and/or glare - slreeth0iis- commercial illuminated signagc and vehicle headlights - are not expected to adveisciv affect the project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. if any: Fred Meyer has selected rccessed lighting fixtures for use on the canopy; directing fixture light downward for customer convenience: preatly reducing or eliminating spillover from the canopy area. Similar shielded fixtures used for parking lot./site illumination serve to reduce spillover at the facility's perimeter- Minimal signage illumination is insufficient to generate any problems and the canopy design, orientation and perimeter/on-site landscaping, further combine to minimize light and/or glare reflected onto adjacent properties, public and/or private rights -of -way, throughout the project. 12. RECREATION a_ What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? To the best of our knowledge, no designated and/or informal recreational opportunities are located in the immediate vicinity of the project site- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. With no recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity of the project site, there will be no displacement associated with this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: With no recreational opportunities affected by this project, no mitigation measures are proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for. national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. To the best of our knowledge, within the immediate vicinity of the project site, there are no structures, places, sites and/or objects either listed or proposed for listing, on any local, state and/or national preservation register. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. To the best of our knowledge, within the imrediate vicinity of the project site, there are no landmarks and/or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific and/or cultural importance at,d/or value. 13193,002_doe - 15 - 02108 G. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any witlr no eaislence of historic, architectural. archacolo"licaL scientific and.!0r cultural importance andror value associated with the project site. and or �t ilhin [lie inrrnediate vicinity. no mitigation measures are proposed 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project site is served by two major highways: peripherally by Carr Road for east -west traffic, and directly by 108th Avenue S.E.. for north -south Traffic, both typically classified as principal arterials in the local transportation plan. Access to the site from these arterials is accomplishcd lhrough the use of numerous existing access driveways from each public rit.lit-of way; internal access from ou-site parking facilities and adjacent commercial uses is provided by a number ol' parking and/or drive aisles on -site- No new dnveways and/or other means of ingress.'egress are being proposed- b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is currently served by public transit provided by King County's Metro Transit. The nearest transit stop is located at the intersection of Carr Road and 108th Avenue S.F-,- approximately %-mile from the fueling facility Given the automobile -related nature of the proposed use, we do not anticipate any extraordinary service demandshinpacts to be realized by public transil agencies. C. Now many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Seven (7) new parking stalls will be provided tinder the proposed site plan, along the western perimeter. Fueling facility employees will use existing on -site parking- llowever, the construction of the Fred Meyer fueling facility will create it net loss of parking-, pending changes to the site plan derived frorn the plan review process, as many as 25 parking spaces may be removed from the on -site parking inventory, but given the shared nature of the parking inventory and the remoteness of- the project site, we do not anticipate any undue hardship will be imposed on customers and/or employees of surrounding businesses. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? In terns of public improvements, we do not anticipate the need for additional public Improvements to infrastructure, over and above the existing level of service provided - The primary fire hydrant serving the site will need to be relocated, but the proposed location will actually bring the hydrant closer to the facility than in its current location. The hydrant relocation is a portion of minimal right-of-way improvements to private drive and/or parking aisles, necessary to facilitate fuel truck deliveries. These improvements will primarily affect landscaping, as a reconfigured, reduced perimeter landscape island (western side) may become necessary to allow for a wider turning radius for fuel truck deliveries. 131931A02ALIC - 16 - 02/08 a WIII the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail. or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Green the automobile --related nature of the proposed else_ we do not anticipate the use. of water_ rail anclr'or air transportation in conjunction �x ith ruelint, lacilit- operation. nor do we anticipate any impacts on those nodes of transporlahM. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Using the methodology and sample data provided by the Ins€ituic of Transportation F,ngineers (1TE), Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. the typical Fred Meyer fueling facility is projected to generate 1,686 total daily trips_ peak volumes are projected to occur between the hours of 4 p-m_ and 6 p-m. ( l37 trips). This data is based on ITE-s sampling of typical gasoline service stations and does not accurately reflect the source of most trips generated by the type of accessory fucling facilities operated by Fred Meyer_ Independent studies of this type of accessory facility, conducted at Fred Meyer locations across the Pacific Northwest. have revealed a majority of trips generated originate from Fred Meyer customers already on -site. customers of adjacent businesses and/Or customers passing by the lacilily, en route to ano€her destination. These "shared", "pass -by" and/or "diverted link- trips account for a significant percentage of the "new" trips generated by the Fred Meyer facility; minimizing the net trip generation figures using ITF's methodology. studies are available to confirm and illustrate these findings. The City of Renton has issued a preliminary determination of the prgject's liability on traffic mitigation; assessing the project over 537,000 in mitigation fees, based on an assessment which categorized approximately 70 percent of the trips generated by the facility, using I`l'E methodology, as shared, pass -by or diverted link trips, and not subject to further mitigation. Given the reduced level of trip generation and the issuance of a certificate of transportation concurrency by King County, earlier this year, the City has waived its traffic impact analysis (TIA) requirement_ Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any - Ty pically, a TIA is used to assess levels of transportation concurrcncy within the adjacent road network, and transportation impacts are mitigated through the I mposition/collection of traffic impact fees and/or the installation of" specific, project -related traffic improvements. Preliminary review has resulted in a waiver of the TIA requirement by Renton staff. Further review by relevant ,jurisdictions may identify the need for specific mitigation of project impacts. Fred Meyer will fully comply with whatever levels of mitigation are agreed upon, as a result of the plan review process. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example-. fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project may require an increase in public safety protection, in line with that customarily associated with commercial activities of this type_ by the applicable j uri sdi ct i ons'depart ments. 1319_.002 doc - 17 - 021t?ti b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Millf"alion measures to cffectivc;y reduce and:or cowrol the demand placed on lire Protection services has been discussed earlier in this checklist (see Section 1:3/. F nvironmental Health). Increased tax revenues- directly derived from jnd!or indirectly attributable to the fueling facility s operations. will contribute towards the mitigation of all public services, including police and fire protection. 1 6- UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricit natural a ate , r use servic� eIephond, , a , septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Elecrriciry_ .Puget Sound Energy "Votural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Watf_r Soos Creek Water tor. Sewer District (connection to Soos Creek Water &Sewer District system; used for air/water unit and irrigation) Ilefrse Service: Waste Management leleLVrorre: Qwest Communications Sfr77itar7: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District (connection to existing Soos Creek Water & Sewer District system for under -canopy runoff) Storrrt Sewer_: Soos Creek Water & Sewer District (connection to existing on -site system; then Soos Creek Water & Sewer District system) Upon inspection, should existing service lines prove unusable due to condition and/or inadequate capacity, the existing connections will be capped and replaced with new lines. Existing lines will be fully inspected, tested, and evaluated prior to initiating the demolition process. C. SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent-' Name Printed: Robert McNeill, Senior Planner, Barghausen Consulting Engincers. Inc late: Mav 30- 2008 FNVCHI.S7.DOC REVISE] OM 13193.002 Voc - 18 - MOB Form No. H Subdivi5ion Guarantee Guarantee Nc.: NCS-352428-OR3 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ;CITY OF 14FNTON RECEIVED, GUARANTEE Issued by First American Title Insurance Company 200 SW Market Street, Suite 750, Portland, OR 97201 Title Officer: L ynnette D. Anderson Phone: (503)795-7600 FAX: (503)795-7614 First American Title Insurance Company Form No. H Guarantee No.: NCS-352428-0R3 Subdivision Guarantee (4-A-75) Page No.: 1 uv i l First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 200 SW Market Street, Suite 250, Portland, OR 97201 (503)795-7600 - FAX (503)795-7614 Multnomah COUNTY TITLE UNIT FAX(503)795-7614 Title Officer: Lynnette D. Anderson (503)795-7600 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE LIABILITY $ 3,000.00 ORDER NO.: NCS-352428-0R3 FEE $ 500.00 TAX $ 45.00 YOUR REF.: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. First American Title Insurance Company a Corporation, herein called the Company Subject to the Liability Exclusions and Limitations set forth below and in Schedule A. GUARANTEES Fred Meyer Stores Incorporated herein called the Assured, against loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. 3. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. Dated: May 05, 2008 at 7:30 A.M. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. I4 SvLdivision Guarantee (4-I0-75) SCHEDULE A The assurances referred to on the Face page are: A. Title is vested in: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc-, an Ohio corporation Guarantee No.: NCS-352428-OR3 Page Nc 2 B. That according to the Company's title plant records relative to the following described real property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said real property or any portion thereof, other than those shown below under Record Matters. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee: 1- Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. DESCRIPTION: LOT Z OF KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L07L0040, ACCORDING TO THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED AUGUST 22, 2007 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070822900006, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. APN: 322305-9016-03 FrstAmencan Title Insurance Company Form No,14 SUbdiVlsiOn Guarantee (9 10-7.5; RECORD MATTERS: General Taxes for the year 2008. Tax Account No.: Amount Billed: Amount Paid: Amount Due: Assessed Land Value: Assessed Improvement Value: 322305-9016-03 $ 204,790.40 $ 102,395.20 $ 102,395.20 $ 6,857,800.00 $ 11,155,500.00 Guarantee Ne.: NC5-3s2428-4R3 Page Nc.: 3 2. Facility Charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for water or sewer facilities of Cascade Sewer District as disclosed by instrument recorded February 7, 1975 and May 5, 1981 under Recording Nos. 7502070239 and 8105050732, Said instrument is correction of the instrument recorded August 22, 1972 under Recording No. 7208220595. 3. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Minerals Reserved By: John Winston and Clara Winston, husband and wife Recorded: October 4, 1912, March 31, 1913, August 2, 1913 and October 5, 1914 Recording Information: 829843, 858693, 880063 and 956710 4. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Minerals Reserved By: Clyde C. Carr and Nellie E. Carr, husband and wife Recorded: April 16, 1917 Recording Information: 1128141 5. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 105th Place S.E. as granted by deed recorded June 1, 1966 under Recording No. 6036161. 6. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for S.E. 108th Street as granted by deed recorded November 5, 1986 under Recording No. 8611051275. 7_ Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 105th Place S.E. as granted by deed recorded June 24, 1987 under Recording No. 8706241489. 8, Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: July 24, 1987 Recording No.: 8707240443 First American Title Insurance Carnpany Fcrm Nn 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: NCS-352428-OR3 Page No.'. 4 9. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: October 5, 1987 under Recording No. 8710050424 In Favor of: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation For: Underground electric transmission and/or distribution system Affects: as described therein 10. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 105th Place S.E. as granted by deed recorded October 22, 1987 under Recording No. 8710220766. it. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 105th Place S.E. and S.E. 180th Street as granted by deed recorded October 22, 1987 under Recording No. 8110220767, 12. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: December 3, 1987 under Recording No. 8712031164 In Favor of: Petro Benson Associates, a Washington general partnership, its successors and assigns For: Ingress and egress, vehicular access Affects: as described therein t3. Conditions, notes, easements, provisions contained and/or delineated on the face of the Survey recorded December 29, 1987 under Recording No. 8712299040, in Volume 59 of surveys, at Page 21, in King County, Washington. 14, Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: January 4, 1988 Recording No.: 880t040279 15. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: January 4, 1988 Recording No.: 8801040280 16_ Lease made by Petro Benson Associates, a Washington general partnership, lessor, to Northern Automotive Corporation, an Arizona corporation, lessee, for a term of 20 years, and the covenants and conditions as therein contained, as disclosed by Memorandum of Lease dated November 20, 1987, and recorded January 19, 1988 as document no. 8801190616. Said lease, among other things provides for an option to renew for a period of 4 additional terms of 5 years each. Affects: The land and other property. First American TINe Insurance Company Form No. 11 Subdw+sion Guarantee f4-10-75; Guarantee No.: NC5-352428-4R3 Pace No.: 5 17. Lease made by Petro Benson Associates, a Washington general partnership, lessor, to Northern Automotive Corporation, an Arizona corporation, lessee, for a term of 20 years, and the covenants and conditions as therein contained, as disclosed by Memorandum of Lease dated May 31, 1988, and recorded July 18, 1988 as document no. 8807180950. Said lease, among other things provides for an option to renew for a period of 4 additional terms of 5 years each. Affects: The land and other property. 18. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: June 12, 1990 under Recording No. 9006121123 In Favor of: King County, a political subdivision For: Fire fighting equipment and associated emergency vehicles to service Benson Corner Affects. as described therein 19. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Agreement for Easement" recorded October 3, 2002 as Recording No. 20021003000635 of official Records. 20. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor/Trustor: Petro Benson LLC, a Washington limited liability company Grantee/Beneficiary: Transamerica Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation Trustee: Chicago Title Insurance Company Amount: $23,250,000.00 Recorded' January 22, 2003 Recording Information: 20030122001043 The Deed of Trust/Mortgage was Partially reconveyed as to as to that portion by instrument recorded April 9, 2007 under Recording No. 20070409002397, The Deed of Trust/Mortgage was Partially reconveyed as to Lots X and Y of King County Boundary Line Adjustment No. 1-071-0040, recorded August 22, 2007 under Recording No. 20070822900006, in King County, Washington by instrument recorded October 19, 2007 under Recording No. 20071019000192. A document recorded September 21, 2007 as Recording No. 20070921001926 of Official Records provides that the deed of trust or the obligation secured thereby has been modified. 21. Assignment of leases and/or rents and the terms and conditions thereof. Assignor: Petro Benson LLC, a Washington limited liability company Assignee: TransAmerica Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation Recorded: January 22, 2003 Recording Information: 20030122001044 First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-352428-OR3 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.: 6 22. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: April 9, 2007 under Recording No. 20070409002396 In Favor of: State of Washington, Department of Transportation and its For: Affects: assigns Highway construction -related activities as described therein 23. Terms, covenants, conditions and restrictions as contained in recorded Lot Line Adjustment (Boundary Line Revision) L07L0040 : Recorded: August 22, 2007 Recording Information: 20070822900006 24. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Consent to Transfer and Loan Assumption and Modification Agreement, executed by and between Petro Benson, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, George R. Osborne, Jr., a single man, Elling B. Halvorson, a married man, Fred Mayer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation, The Kroger Co., an Ohio corporation and Transamerica Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation, recorded September 21, 2007 as Instrument No. 20070921001925 of Official Records, 25. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: Recording No.: September 21, 2007 20070921001927 26. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Memorandum of Option Agreement and Right of First Offer, executed by and between Petro Benson, LLC, a Washington limited liability company and Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation, recorded September 21, 2007 as Instrument No. 20070921001928 of Official Records. 27. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Ordinance No. 5327" recorded January 9, 2008 as Recording No. 20080109000833 of Official Records. 28. Pendency of action in King County Circuit Court/Superior Court. Plaintiff: Michelle Flowers Defendant: Fred Meyer Stores Inc Case No.: 07-2-39719-1 Recorded/Filed: December 17, 2007 Action For: Personal Injury Attorney for Plaintiff: Michael Eugene Blue First American Title Insurance Company Form No.14 SAIVISion Guarantee (4-10-75) 29. Pendency of action in King County Circuit Court/Superior Court. Plaintiff: Beta Bothell Center Guarantee Nc -: NCS-352428-OR3 PaQP No.: 7 Defendant: Quality Food Centers Inc, aka Kroger Co., and nka Fred Meyer Stores Inc Case No.: 08-2-10671-3 Recorded/Filed: March 27, 2008 Action For: Commercial Attorney for Plaintiff: John Randolph Tomlinson, Jr. 30. Matters that may be disclosed upon recordation of the final subdivision. First American Title tnsarance Company rnrm No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-352428-OR3 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page Nc.- S INFORMATIONAL NOTES A. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-352428-OR3 5ubdivi5ion Guarantee (4-10-79) Page No.: 9 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE I. Fxcepl to the extent that s, ,c fic assurance are provided in Schedule A of this (Alorantec, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, bens, ennlmbrances, adverse claims or other rnatters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing a:,thonty [liar levies taxes or as5cssrnents on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or nubces of such proceedings, whether or not the rnatters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records- (c) (1) Unpatented mining clairns; (2) reservations or exceptions in patent or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any, specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the fo I lowi ng: (a) Defects, liens, enrumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth In Schedule (A), (C) or in Part ) of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right tc maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. I Defects, bens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds, (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non -judicial proceeding which Is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (d) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Cornpdriy. (b) "land": the land described Or referred to in Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to m Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys; lanes, ways or waterways. (c.) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records" records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as slated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all Iiabi€ity of the Company shall terminate with regard to Lhe matter or matters fir which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Corrpany shall in no case prejudice the riahts of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty tc defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured Is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth ran Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and Prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may hp necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or darnage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. rat the Corrpany shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shafi do so diligently, (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shalt have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor wlfl the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the previsions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order, (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide For the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide fur the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion Of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cuuperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall de furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain tlm_, facts giving rise to the loss or damage. I he proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possihle, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company IS prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce fur examination, inspection and copyinq, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, ail records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy ail records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda io tf>e custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the Loss or Damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company, pursuant to thcs Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the (lair- Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Form Nu 128) tReu 12lI5f95) First AnJencan Title Insurance Company 6. options to Pay or otherwise Settle Claims: 'Termination of Liability. Irr case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the followmy additional options (a) to Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of I.iability, or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the nptioa to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim whi(h could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortrlage or a henholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, ruasonable attorneys' foes and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time cf purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of daim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Corrrpany upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Corrrpany of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered tc the Company for canceK30un. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim Assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 1, 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss ar damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The habifity of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the rnurtgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Serhon 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Suction 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest srhject to any defect, lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the tile, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (h) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntanly assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the pnur written consent of the Company, 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' tees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsenient of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Coni and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter, 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shati vest in the Coniparny unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perlect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Curnpany to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured ip any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall i5e subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12. Arbitratign. Unless. prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy of claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company it connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $1,000,000 or less shall be. arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shaii be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located perrrlts a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having Jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained frcirn the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, it any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee ran be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be giver the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 2 First American Way. Bldg. 1, Santa Ana, CA. 92707. Form NO.1262 (Rev_12lI5;95) First American Title Insurance Company F CEIVED DKFk /0-12_p'7 w •P f First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, WA 98121 August 13, 2007 Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation 900 SW Fifth Portland, OR 97202 Title Officer; Phone: Order Number: NCS-297159-OR3 Escrow Officer: Rachael Bushnell Phone: (503)699-6578 Buyer: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation Property: Lot 7, Renton, WA Attached please find the following item(s): A Policy of Title Insurance Thank You for your confidence and support. We at First American Title Insurance Company maintain the fundamental principle: Customer First: First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (10117/92) ALTA Owrer's Policy Number: NCS-2FI59-OR3 Page Number: I r Policy of Title Insurance Srt .\ r. iLl f ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company SUa3ECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, FHE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN 5CHEOULE t3 AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, FIRST AMERiCAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a CA corporation, herein cared the Company, insures, as of bate of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Arnount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest descjibed in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketabilfty of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' Fees and expenses irxurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. >F'ir-s'l.-1awrier n rifle ln-winto" ('mirpu' )' A S—i—esT 1.15tx?rartP First American Title Insurance Company Form No 1,402.92 (1)/17192) AL7 A Owner's Policy PROFORMA POLICY SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance: $34,000,000.00 Date of Policy: September 21, 2007 at 2:20 p.m. 0 Number=NCS-297159-aR3 Page Number:2 Policy Number: NCS-297159-OR3 I. Name of insured: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest In the land is vested in: Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: LOT Z OF KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L07L0040, ACCORDING: TO THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED AUGUST 22, 2007 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070822900006, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. First American Title Insurance Company Farm No. 1402.92 (10/11/92) ALTA Owrie�s Policy SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE , Number_ NCS-297159-OR3 Page Number: 3 This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: PART ONE SECTION ONE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. q. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disdose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. First American Title Insurance Company Form No.1402.92 (10/17192) ALTA Owner's Policy SECTION TWO ( Number: NCS-297159-OR3 Page Number: 4 1. Facility Charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for water or sewer facilities of Cascade Sewer District as disclosed by instrument recorded February 7, 1975 and May 5, 1981 under Recording Nos. 7502070239 and 8105050732. Said instrument is correction of the instrument recorded August 22, 1972 under Recording No. 7208220595, 2. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Minerals Reserved By: John Winston and Clara Winston, husband and wife Recorded: October 4, 1912, August 2, 1913, March 31, 1913 and October 5, 1914 Recording Information: 829843, 858693, 880063 and 956710 3. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Minerals Reserved By: Clyde C. Carr and Nellie E. Carr, husband and wife Recorded: April 16, 1917 Recording Information: 1128141 4. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 105th Place S.E. as granted by deed recorded June 1, 1966 under Recording No. 6036161. 5. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for S.E. 108th Street as granted by deed recorded November 5, 1986 under Recording No. 8611051275. 6. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 105th Place S.E. as granted by deed recorded June 24, 1987 under Recording No. 8706241489. 7. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: July 24, 1987 Recording No.: 8707240443 8. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein. Recording Information: October 5, 1987 under Recording No. 8710050424 In Favor of: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation For: Underground electric transmission and/or distribution system Affects: as described therein f _ 9. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 105th Place S.E. as granted by deed recorded October 22, 1987 under Recording No. 8710220766. First American Tittle Insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (10/17192) 0 Number: NCs-297159-OR3 ALTA Owner's Poky Page Number: 5 10. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 105th Place S.E. and S.E. 180th Street as granted by deed recorded October 22, 1981 under Recording No. 8710220767. 11. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: December 3, 1987 under Recording No. 8712031164 In Favor of: Petro Benson Associates, a Washington general partnership, its successors and assigns For: Ingress and egress, vehicular access Affects: as described therein 12. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: January 4, 1988 Recording No.: 8801040279 13. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: January 4, 1988 Recording No.: 8801040280 14. Lease made by Petro Benson Associates, a Washington general partnership, lessor, to Northern Automotive Corporation, an Arizona corporation, lessee, for a term of 20 years, and the covenants and conditions as therein contained, as disclosed by Memorandum of Lease dated November 20, 1987, and recorded January 19, 1988 as document no. 8801190616. said lease, among other things provides for an option to renew for a period of 4 additional terms of 5 years each. ( Includes other property) 15. Lease made by Petro Benson Associates, a Washington general partnership, lessor, to Northern Automotive Corporation, an Arizona corporation, lessee, for a term of 20 years, and the covenants and conditions as therein contained, as disclosed by Memorandum of Lease dated May 31, 1986, and recorded July 18, 1988 as document no. 8807180950. Said lease, among other things provides for an option to renew for a period of 4 additional terms of 5 years each. ( Includes other property) 16. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: June 12, 1990 under Recording No. 9006121123 In Favor of: King County, a political subdivision For: Fire fighting equipment and associated emergency vehicles to service Benson Corner Affects: as described therein 17_ The terms, provisions and easements) contained in the document entitled "Agreement for Easement" recorded October 3, 2002 as Recording No. 20021003000635 of Official Records. FitstAlmerican Title -Insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (10117192) AM Owner's Policy Number: NC5-297I59-OR3 Page Number:6 18. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor/Trustor: Petro Benson LLC, a Washington limited liability company Grantee/Beneficiary: TransAmerica Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation Trustee: Chicago Title Insurance Company Amount: $23, 250, 000.00 Recorded: January 22, 2003 Recording Information: 20030122001043 The Deed of Trust/Mortgage was Partially reconveyed as to as to that portion by instrument recorded April 9, 2007 under Recording No. 20070409002397. Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded September 21, 2007 as 2-0070921001926 of Official Records. ( Includes other property) 19. Assignment of leases and/or rents and the terms and conditions thereof: Assignor: Petro Benson LLC, a Washington limited liability company Assignee: TransAmerica Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation Recorded: January 22, 2003 Recording Information: 20030122001044 ( Includes other property) 20. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: April 9, 2007 under Recording No. 20070409002396 In Favor of: State of Washington, Department of Transportation and its assigns For: Highway construction -related activities Affects: as described therein 21. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. 22. Conditions, notes, easements, provisions contained and/or delineated on the face of the Survey recorded December 29, 1987 under Recording No. 8712299040, in volume 59 of surveys, at page 21, in King County, Washington. 23. Survey by Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated November 27, 2002, job no. 0233.10 , discloses the following: 1. Concrete curbing extends over outer property lines. 24. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the King County Boundary Line Adjustment No. L07L0040 recorded under Recording No. 20070822900006, in King County, Washington. First American TWO Insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) ALTA Owner's Policy 0 Number: NCS-297159-OR3 Page Number: 7 25. A document entitled "Consent to Transfer and Loan Assumption and Modification Agreement", executed by and between Petro Benson, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, George R. Osborne, Jr., a single man, Elling B. Halvorson, a married man, Fred Mayer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation, The Kroger Co., an Ohio corporation and Transamerica Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation recorded September 21, 2007, as Instrument No. 20070921001925 of Official Records. 26. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: Recording No.: September 21, 2007 20070921001927 27. A document entitled "Memorandum of Option Agreement and Right of First Offer", executed by and between Petro Benson, LLC, a Washington limited liability company and Fred Meyer Stores, Inc., an Ohio corporation recorded September 21, 2007, as Instrument No. 20070921001928 of Official Records. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. NO2.92 (10/17/92) ALTA Owner's Policy Or - Number. NCS-297159-OR3 Page Number, 8 ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. NCS-297159-OR3 Issued By First American Title Insurance Company The Company insures the insured against loss or damage sustained by reason of: The existence, at Date of Policy, of any of the following unless expressly excepted in Schedule B: (a) Present violations on the land of any enforceable covenants, conditions or restrictions, or any existing improvements on the land which violate any building setback lines shown on a plat of subdivision recorded or filed in the public records. (b) Any instrument referred to in Schedule B as containing covenants, conditions or restrictions on the land which, in addition, (i) establishes an easement on the land; (ii) provides for an option to purchase, a right of first refusal or the prior approval of a future purchaser or occupant, or (1) provides a right of reentry, possibility of reverter or right of forfeiture because of violations on the land of any enforceable covenants, conditions or restrictions. (c) Any encroachment of existing improvements located on the land onto adjoining land, or any encroachment onto the land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. (d) Any encroachment of existing improvements located on the land onto that portion of the land subject to any easement excepted in Schedule B. (e) Any notices of violation of covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to environmental protection recorded or filed in the public records. 2. Damage to existing buildings: (a) Which are located on or encroach upon that portion of the land subject to any easement excepted in Schedule B, which damage results from the exercise of the right to maintain the easement for the purpose for which it was granted or reserved; (b) Resulting from the future exercise of any right existing at Date of Policy to use the surface of the land for the extraction or development of minerals excepted from the description of the land or excepted in Schedule B. 3. Any final court order or judgment requiring the removal from any land adjoining the land of any encroachment, other than fences, landscaping or driveways, excepted in Schedule B. 4. Any final court order or judgment denying the right to maintain any existing building on the land because of any violation of covenants, conditions or restrictions or building setback lines shown on a plat of subdivision recorded or filed in the public records. Wherever in this endorsement the words "covenants, conditions or restrictions" appear, they shall not be deemed to refer to or include the terms, covenants, conditions or limitations contained in an instrument creating a lease. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) ALTA Owner's Poky Oru,r Number: NCS-297159-OR3 Pace Number: 9 As used in paragraphs t(a) and 4, the words "covenants, conditions or restrictions" shall not be deemed to refer to or include any covenants, conditions or restrictions relating to environmental protection. This endorsement is issued as part of the polity. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements. Endorsement 9.2 (Restrictions, Encroadiments, Minerals Owner's Policy: Improved land) Adopted 10/17/98 section IV-15 FirstAmer%can Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (1011Y192) AL7A Owner's POligr Of—r Number: NCS-297159-OR3 Page Number: 10 ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No, NCS-297159-OR3 Issued By First American Title Insurance Company The Company insures the Insured against loss or damage sustained by reason of lack of priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over: (a) any environmental protection lien which, at Date of Policy, is recorded in those records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge, or filed in the records of the clerk of the United States district court for the district in which the land is located, except as set forth in Schedule B. or (b) any environmental protection lien provided for by any state statute in effect at Date of Policy, except environmental protection liens provided for by the following state statutes: None. This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior ' endorsements. FA. Form 40 Environmental Protection Lien First American Trtle Insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (IU 17192) ALTA Owner's Policy Number: NCS•297159-OR3 Page Number: 11 ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. NCS-297159-OR3 Issued By First American Title Insurance Company The Company insures the owner of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage against loss or damage sustained by reason of: any assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy not excepted in Schedule B which now have gained or hereafter may gain priority over the lien of the insured mortgage. This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements. ALTA Form 1 (Street Assessments), (revised 9/27/86, effective 6/1/87) First American Tide Insurance Company Form No. 1492.92 (10/N/92) 0.— Number: NCS-297159-OR3 ALTA Owner's Policy Page %mber: 12 ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. NCS-297159-OR3 Issued By FlrstAmerican Title Insurance Company The Company hereby insures the insured against loss or damage which the insured shall sustain by reason of the failure of the [and to abut upon a physically open street known as 106th Avenue Southeast. This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (iii) extend the bate of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements. CLTA Form 103.7 (Rev. 6-14-96) ALTA or CLTA - Owner or Lender First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1902.92 (10/17/92) ALTA Owner's Puhcy Number: NCS-247159-0R3 Page Number: 13 ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. NCS-297159-OR3 Issued By First American Title Insurance Company The Company hereby insures the Insured against loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of the land referred to in Schedule A not consisting of separate tax lot(s) or said lots) including any property not included within said land. This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements. F.A. Form 64 (Revised 3/99) Separate Tax Lot First American True insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (10117/92) ALTA Owner's Policy Number: NC5-297159-OR3 Page Number: 19 ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. NCS-297159-01113 Issued By First American Title Insurance Company The Company hereby agrees with the insured Partnership, Limited Liability Company, etc. that this Policy and the coverage provided to the insured Partnership, Limited Liability Company, etc. hereunder shall not be deemed to have lapsed, or to have been forfeited, or to have terminated because of the occurrence, subsequent to the Date of Policy, of either of the following events (provided that the insured Partnership, Limited Liability Company, etc. has not been dissolved or discontinued by reason of the following events pursuant to applicable state law): the admission or withdrawal of any individual or entity as a partner or member in the insured Partnership, Limited Liability Company, etc. , or a change in any partnees or member's interest in capital or profits of, or as partner or member, the insured Partnership, Limited Liability Company, etc, . Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be a waiver of any rights the Company may otherwise have under this Policy. This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (ill) extend the Date of a Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements. F.A. Form 55 Fairway Endorsement First Amerman TINe Insurance Company Form No. 1402.92 (10/17192) ALTA Owner's Policy O lumber: NCS-297159 OR3 Page Number: 15 ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. NCS-297159-0113 Issued By First American Title Insurance Company The Company hereby insures the insured against loss or damage which the insured shall sustain by reason of the failure of the land described in Schedule A to be contiguous to each other. This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (lii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements. CLTA Form 116.4 (Revised 6-14-96) ALTA or CLTA - Owner or Lender First American Title Insurance Company April 14. 2008 KA Project No. 092-08040 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INN'LSTIGATION FRE:I) MEYER GAS STATION BENSON PLAZA SITE DEVELOPIVENTPtANN1NG 17801 t08i I' .AVENt E SE C" DP REN7'ON RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 JuN 18 2008 INTRODUCTION :-RECEIVEb This report presents the results of our rcview of the boring logs generated during an environmental subsurface study at the Fred Meyer Benson Plara Site. and the development of' geotechnical reconttnendations based on the subsurface soils and groundwater conditions observed in those borings. The Fred Meyer gas station site is situated xvitlrin the Fred Meyer complex located at 17801 108"' Avenue SE. in Renton. Washington (Appendix A. Figure I ). Discussions regarding site conditions are presented herein, together with conclusions and recommendations pertaining to site preparation. structural fill, utility trench backfill. drainage and landscaping— erosion control. foundations, concrete floor slabs and exterior flattvork. A site plan showing the approximate locations of the borin`s conducted durinL7 the earlier environmental study are presented in Appendix A (Figure 2). follotxing the text of this report. Appendix B contains guides to aid in the development of earthwork specifications. If conflicts in the text of the report occur with the general specifications m ;appendix 13. the recommendations in the text of the report have precedence. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This geotechnical report is based on the revicw of- subsurface boring logs generated during an environmental study conducted by Krazan & Associates. Inc. at the prgect site on .lone 4"' & 51", 2007 The subsurface study was conducted for a Phase 11 Environinental study. and the ensuing report was dated July 3, 2007. Our scope of services was performed in general accordance %xith the proposal for this project, dated April 10, 2008 G08-054WAB and included the follo%-ving: • Evaluation of the data obtained from previous subsurtacc investigation and completion of engineering analyses to develop recorninendations for use in the project desi,n and preparation of -construction specifications. • Preparation of this report summarizing our findings. the results of our analyses and our conclusions and recommendations for this investigation. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Fred Meyer Inc. provided us with a preliminary site plan for the proposed pro.lect. This site plan shows the property boundaries and the footprint of -the proposed fueling, island and canopy area. the location of - the proposed USTs. and the proposed kiosk. We understand that the proposed project will consist of the construction of a new gas station N�ith tine (5) ti111D fuchn'-, island and a canopy_ situated in approximately the east -central portion ol'thc existing Fred Meyer Store site alone 108" :Avenue SI:. A small 8' x 14' kiosk is proposed in the cast -central portion of the fuclintg, island canopy (along the eastern drip line of the canopy). We understand that the nem kiosk buddinti Will consist of wood frame construction and will utilise a conventional spread footing foundation �tiitlr slab -on -grade floor. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Fred Meyer site is located at 17801 108"' Ave SE, Renton, Washington (see Fie21.1re I and 2). The subject property consists of a Fred Meyer Store and several other buildings housitlg multiple retail businesses. The site has a norlhv.esterly declivity and is situated approximately 370 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Adjoining properties to the subject site «ere developed fir commercial and residential use. GEOLOGIC SETTING The site lies within an area that has been geologically mapped as "Vashon till", as shown on the "Geologic Map of King County_ Washington". by Vaughn F. [.ivirr`1ston. Jr. 1970. The native medium dense to very dense silty sand that we observed in the test borings is consistent with this classification. SOIL. PROFILE.. AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface soil conditions observed during the field in cstiy,:ition associated with the environmental study generally consisted of loose to dense uncontrolled fill underlain by eery dense native glacial till soils which are consistent with the described geological unit(s). Exploratory Boring ETB-2. 3, 6. 9, 10 and 11 surround the proposed fueling facility site. The subsurface conditions observed in these borings consisted of a pa�emcnt section consisting Of' asphaltic concrete and gravel base material underlain by approximately twenty form (24) to twenty-five and one- half (25 'h) feet of" uncontrolled fill. This uncontrolled fill consisted of locally derived sand and silty sand material that exhibited loose to dense relative density (based on the SPT test data from the borings). Loose uncontrolled fill soils were encountered in the test borings to a maximum depth of approximately twelve (12) feet bgs in the area of FTB-4 and E f13-1 1. The remainder of the borings exhibited loose soils to a maximum depth of approximately eight (8) feet bgs. The uncontrolled fill soils were underlain by very dense native silty s;md (glacial till)_ which was observed to the termination depth of the test borings. For additional inlixmation about the soils: rocks encountered, please refer to logs of the exploratory borings in Appendix A. BEARING SOILS The medium dense to dense uncontrolled fill encountered below the depths of eight (9) and twelve (12) feet bgs. and very dense, native silty sand (SM) is suitable for the support of cngineered structures designed for a maximum safe bearing capacity of 2,000 psf in compression. The on -site loose uncontrolled fill and other loose: saturated soils are not suitable for the support of - engineered structures. as excessive arTrounts of-diffcrential settlements would occur upon the imposition of structural loads on these soils. GROUNDWATER The exploratory borings «ere monitored fir the presence of -roundwater during and 11nnlediate1v following, the drilling operations. Groundwalcr was not encokultered in the test borings. It should be recognised that Dialer table elevations might fluctuate With time. Hie ground%+ater Ic%el will be dependent upon seasonal precipitation. irrigation. land use. and climatic conditions. as well as other factors. Therefore, wafer levels at the time of the field investigation may be different from those encountered during the construction phase of -the project. For detailed test boring lots. please refer to Appendix A. SEISMIC CONDITIONS The soils encountered in the exploratory borings. primarily below a depth of about approximately tx%elve (12) feet consisted of'rneditun dense to very dense uncontrolled fill and native glacial till. The overall soil profile based on the competent fill and native soils observed below the loose fill soils +tienerally corresponds to a site class soil profile of' "D­ as defined by Table 161 5.1.1 of" the 2003 Infcl-notional Building Codc OH(). The maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration at short periods (Ss) and the maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration at 1-second period (Sr) is determined to be 125 and 50 respectively_ The values of seismic Site Coefficients ka and F, as a function of Site Class and mapped spectral response acceleration at short periods and at l-second period for the on -site soils are calculated to be 1.0 and 1. respectively. CONCLUSIONS & RECO'4'IMENDAT11ON Based on the findings of this investigation.. it is our opinion that the site is gcotechnically suitable For the development of the proposed project provided that our geotechnical recommendations are followed during the design and construction phases of the project. The results of the field investigation show that the site is underlain by up to twelve (12) feet of loose uncontrolled fill soils, that are in turn underlain by medium dense to very dense uncontrolled fill and native glacial till soils. The medium dense to very dense uncontrolled fill. native soils or structural fill soils placed over the afore€mentioned bearing soils in conformance with our recommendations would be suitable for the support of engineered loads designed fora maximum safe bearing capacity of 2.000 psf. We do not anticipate encountering groundNNatcr in the fiST excavations, based on the field observation of test borings. However, <proundwater may be encountered in deep excavations depending upon the time of the year and the depth of' excavation. If groundwater is encountered in the excavations. then ICrazan & Associates, file should be contacted immediately to develop specific recommendations for site dewitering. which are beyond our current scope of Nvork. We recommend that the earthwork contractor be prepared to conduct on -site excavation dewatering. if vroundwater were to be encountered. PRELIM] NARYRECOMMENDATIONS The following geotcchnical recommendations are preliminary. as they are based on our current understanding of the proposed project. We recommend that %ve be engaged to review the project plans in order to provide revised. augmented. or additional Ucotcchnical recommendations as required. Sub -grade Preparation We recommend stripping and remONIEW all construction debris and loose and/or- saturated soils from the proposed building and paving areas prior 10 foundation. building slab and proposed pavement placement. If the site grades need to be elevated_ then the site should be brought to the desired buildinlJpavrment sub -grade elevation by placement of structural fill in conformance with the recommendations presented in the Cut and fill Requirements section of this report. The near surface fine -Brained soils are extremely rrroisture sensitive due to the content of fines in the soil. The construction of temporary roadways using quarry spalls, compacted till. or geotextile fabric may become necessary to minimize the disturbance of the on -site soils and to provide a working surface for construction traffic especially during wet weather conditions. The site should be graded to prevent water front ponding within construction areas andr'or flowing into excavations. Accumulated water must be removed immediately along with any unstable soil. Foundation concrete should be placed and excavations backfilled as soon as possible to protect the sub- grade- The onsite soils have relatively high silt content and are considered moisture sensitive. lf' over - excavation is necessary'. it should be confirmed throu4-h continuous monitoring and testing by a qualified -cotechnical engineer or, senior geologist. Soils that become unstable are recommended to be dried and rccompacted. Selective drying may be accomplished by scarifying or windrowing surficial material durin4- extended periods of dry, warm weather (typically during the stnntner). If the soils cannot be dried back to a workable moisture condition, remedial measures may be required_ Any buried stnrctures encountered during construction should be properly removed and backfilled. Excavations, depressions. or soft and pliant areas extending below the planned finish sub -grade levels should be cleaned to firm undisturbed soil. and backfilled with structural fill. A represerrtalive of our lints should be present during all site clearing and grading operations to test and observe earthwork construction. This testing and observation is an integral pail of our service, as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction and stability of the material. The geotechnical engineer/ geologist may reject any material that does not meet compaction and stability requirements. Further recommendations_ contained in this report, are predicated upon (lie assumption that earthwork construction will conform to the recommendations set forth in this section and in the Structural Fill section. A Krazan & Associates, Inc. geologist or geotechnical engineer should observe the temporary cut slopes ciurin<g the excavation work. The reasoning for this is that specific site soil conditions are not fully delineated at this time. In case of tcmporary slope cuts. the existing soil conditions may not be fully revealed until the excavation work exposes the soil. Typically. as excavation work progresses the maximum inclination of the temporary slope will need to be reevaluated by the geotechnical engineer- geologist so that supplemental recommendations can he made. Soil and groundwater conditions can be highly variable. Scheduling for soil work will need to be adjustable. to deal with unanticipated conditions_ so that the project can proceed smoothly and required deadlines can be met. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction_ Krazan & Associates. Inc. should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. Canopv Foundations Based on our conversations �N ith the project em-Firiccr. and our experience ivjth fueling, island canopy foundations. it is Our understandint-1 that the proposed foundations fir the canopy support columns would be placed at approximately five (5) feet below site grade. Based on the subsurface information contained in our files, we anticipate encountering loose. uncontrolled fill soils to a minimum depth of approximately eight (S) feet has. In order to niitigatc excessive differentia[ settlements. we recommend that all canopy foundations be seated on medium dense to eery dense uncontrolled fill observed below the loose till. We further recommend that the proposed canopy foundation subgrade be observed and approved by our representative prior to placing footing concrete_ Kiosk Foundations We recommend that the proposed kiosk footing subgrade be overexcavated by a minimum of one ( I ) foot. This overexcavation should extend a minimum of' six (6) inches beyond the exterior edges of the proposed footing. The exposed subgrade should be scarified. and recompacted to minimum 95% of the materials maximum dry density (MUD) value as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. The overexeavation should then be backfil[ed with structural till to the desired footing elevation. The proposed kiosk footin4"I should then be placed over this prepared subgrade. The proposed kiosk footings should be proportioned for a maximum safe bearing capacity of 1,500 psf in compression placed below the frost penetration depth (approximately 18 inches). Any disturbed soils should be mechanically cornpacted to a non -yielding state prior to the placement of footing concrete. UST Installation All underground storage tanks may be placed on firm subgrade consisting of the on -site uncontrolled till or native siltv sand. Although no groundvvater was encountered in the borings conducted at the site, we recommend that the proposed underground storage tanks be adequately anchored to counteract the buoyant forces acting upon the tanks due to the accumulation of groundwater in the UST cavity. The storage tanks should be fastened with straps anchored in concrete deadman beams on both sides of` the proposed tanks_ The deadman anchors should be designed by a qualified engineer to counteract the buoyant forces acting upon the UST's especially during the periods when the tanks are near empty. Adequate containment Should be provided around the proposed UST's and UST intake valves to mitigate spills contributing to the contamination of the groundwater. Parking & Pavement Area Sub -grade Preparation We recommend that all existing structures be removed from the proposed pavement areas. Subsequent to the demolition activities. the proposed parking and driveway areas should be cleared of all construction debris. topsoil and loose_ organic and saturated soils. If the site grades need to be elevated, then the paverent sub -grade should be brought to the desired sub- ,rade elevation by placing structural fill per our recommendations. In areas where the current site grade is higher than the proposed pavement elevation. vve recommend that the native soil sub -grade be excavated to the proposed parking and driveway pavement section sub -grade elevation. The exposed sub -grade should be proof -rolled with appropriate rubber tire mounted heavy construction equipment or a loaded dump truck to identify any soft yielding areas. Anv soft%yiclding areas identified should be over -excavated and repaired b%- placing structural fill or two to torn- (2-4) inch quarry spalls, to the desired elevation. If the construction is conducted during inclement weather conditions. and the exposed sub -grade consists of moisture sensitive tine 4,raincd soils. then we recommend that this sub - trade be covered with a-,cotextile Fabric such ab Mirafi'H; 600X or equivalent. This gcotcxtilc should be stretched tight over the pavernent sub -grade_ ensuring that the fabric is devoid of any wrinkles or snag. The geotextile fabric should be placed in conformance to the manufacturer's specifications. The proposed pavernent sections confOrrnin, to the recommendations presented in this report may then be placed over the prepared sub -grade. 11-'e recommend that we be enraged to monitor the preparation and proof -rolling ofpavement sub -,grade. We recommend that the suitability of the parkin, and driveway area sub -grade be verified by a geotechnical en11ineer"geolo21ist prior to placement of the pavement section. In the event that unsuitable areas are identified. then should be repaired with properly compacted fill or crushed rock. Cut and Fill Requirements The contractor and Subcontractor should be aware of and familiar with applicable local. state and federal safely regulations, including the current OSHA Excavation and Trench Safety Standards and OSHA Health and Safetv Standards for Excavations. 29 CYR Fart 1926. or successor regulations_ We anticipate that excavations on the order of fifteen (I5) feet in depth will be required for the placement of the proposed UST's. Where possible. the excavation walls deeper than four (4) feet should be sloped to a grade of III: IV (Horizontal Vertical) provided that the site is adequately dewatered if groundwater is encountered in the excavations. The stability of the cuts and cut slopes should be observed by a qualified gcotechnical engineer%geologist during construction to provide recommendations as required. Stockpiled fill .slopes should not be steeper than ] H: IV (Horizontal : Vertical). Soils should be stockpiled aw-ay from the top of the cut slopes. No heavy equipment should be allowed near the top of temporary cut slopes unlcSS the cut slopes are adequately braced. Final. excavation slopes or fill slopes should be graded to an angle of 2H:IV or flatter. We recommend that exposed soils be immediately h-ydroseeded and/or planted with vegetation after construction. The results of our field investigation indicate that most of the silty on -site Soils are not suitable for placement as structural fill because of excessive fines content. If fill needs to be imported to the site. we recommend that the material conform to the following gradation based on the test procedures outlined in ASTM D 1 140-92 for %) passing the i! 200 (75-µin) sieve and ASTM D 422-63 for particle size analysis: Table l: Recommended Gradation for Imported Soil. Sieve Size Percent Fjj S 4 inch 100 #4 25-65 #200 5.0 maximum Based on the fraction passing the 114 Sieve We recommend that we sample imported lilt material prior to its placement Im conductin« appropriate laboratory testing to insure compliance with our recommendations. We recommend that v c be engaged to provide on -site recommendations For subgrade preparation and excavation so that soil condili()ns can be continuously monitored. All structural fill should be placed in maximum citJlt (8) inch thick loose lifts and compacted to at least 95'No ofthe maximum dry density value as determined by ASTM D 1557. Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and sediment control (ESC) IS used to minimize the transportation of sediment to wetlands. streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment control measures should be taken and these measures should be in general accordance with local regulations, At a minimum_ the follom?ML, basic recommendations Should be incorporated into the design of the erosion and sediment control features of -the site: 1) Phase the soil, foundation. utility_ and other work. requiring excavation OF the disturbance of -tile site soils, to take place daring the dry season (generally May through September). However. provided precautions are taken using Best Management Practices (F3il- P's). grading activities can be undertaken during the vet season (generilIv October throus)h April). It should be noted that this typically increases the overall cost of the project. 2) All site work should be completed and Stabilized as quickly as possible. 3) Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be required to reduce the possibility of sediment entering the surface water. This may include additional silt fences, silt fences with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS). constntction of a berm, or other filtration Systems. 4) Any nrnoff generated by dewatering discharge Should be treated through construction of- a sediment trap if there is sufficient space_ if space is limited other filtration methods will need to be incorporated. Drainage The {ground surface should slope a,+vay from building pads and pavement areas_ toward appropriate drop inlets or other surface drainage devices. It is recommended that adjacent exterior grades be sloped a minimum of' 2 percent for a minimum distance of 5 feet away from structures. hoof drains should be tightlined away from foundations_ Sub -grade soils in pavement areas should be sloped a minimum of I percent and drainage gradients maintained to carry all surface water to collection facilities and off -site. These grades should be maintained for the life of the project. UST & Utihty Trench/Deep Excavations Based on subsurface information pertaining to the site in our files, it is our opinion that groundrkater is not likely be encountered in the UST and Utility excavations. I lowever. the contractor shall be prepared for dewatering, in case ground��ater is encountered. All utility trench backtill should consist of imported structural fill or suitable on -Site material. Utility trench backtill placed in or adjacent to buildings and exterior slabs should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the tnaximurn dry density based on ASTM Tcst Method D1557. FOUNDATION PLACEMENT CanonN Foundations Foundation sub -grade prepared in conlormarrce with the recommendation~ presented earlier is suitable for the support 01'structan-e loads designed for a rnaxirnurn safe bearing capacity of 21.000 psf (pounds per cubic Jbot) in compression. With structural foundation loads up to a maximum of 2.000 psf, we anticipate total settlement under footings to not exceed 34 of an inch and differential settlement between isolated COlrtrrrn footings or along 50 feet of continuous ibutinns to not exceed 1/2 inch. We anticipate that most of the settlement will occur immediately upon imposition of the loads (during construction). "The lateral resistance of -spread footirws is controlled by a combination of sliding resistance between the footing and the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the buried portions of the footings. We recommend a passive earth pressure in the ons]'te uncontrolled fill soils surrounding the canopy foundation elements of 175 pcf equivalent fluid. This pas si%,c resistance Value is based on a Factor of Safety (FS) of 1.5. We recommend a coefficient of base friction of 0.30 be used between cast - in -place concrete (footingF base) and the foundation sub -grade soils rocks_ Footing widths should comply lvith applicable building codes. All exterior footings Should be at least 18 inches below the find exterior grade for frost protection. Prior to footing placement. any soft. loose or wet areas encountered in the footing areas should be removed and replaced with structural fill, annular crushed rock_ controlled density fill (CDT_), -'Jean mix concrete or additional footing concrete. _Fhe crushed rock or structural fill Should be placed in rmiform lifts and mechanically compacted between lifts. We recommend that we be engaged to verify excavation to suitable bearing strata prior to foundation placement and to observe placement and compaction of"the backfill. Kiosk Foundations We recommend that the foundation Sub -grade ibr the proposed Kiosk be overexcavated to one (1) foot below the footinn elevation. Any disturbed or loose soils should be mechanically compacted to a rron- yiefding state prior to the placement of footing concrete. The overexcavation should then be backlillcd with structural fill placed in confbrtnancc with our recommendations. The proposed kiosk foundations should then be placed directly over the prepared sub -grade. Foundations placed on an approved bearing sub -grade should be proportioned for a maxin-nnn safe hearing capacity of 1.000 psf in compression. We recommend a passive earth pressure in compacted fill soils of 175 pcf (pounds per cubic foot) equivalent fluid_ This passive resistance value is based on a factor of Safety (FS) of 1.5. We recommend a coefficient of base friction of 0.30 be used between cast -in -place concrete (footing base) and the foundation sub -grade soils. Slab -On -Grade Floors We recommend that all slab -on -grade floors be placed on at least six (6) inches of 5:8 ]'rich minus crushed material (acting also as capillary break material), which is compacted to 95'�% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTVI 1) 1557 method_ This material should contain less than 5 percent of material passing the #200 sieve based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve. The floor slab rnav also be rendered Nva€erproof by the Use of admixtures or by sealinu the surfacc of tltc slab -on -grade floor by applying topical treatments. The addition of admixtures or the application of surficial treatments .Should protect the slab -on -grade from debonding of' resilient flooring dt€e to moisture min,ration and capillary action inside the slab. The admixture or surface sealers should be added to the slab concrete or applied to the surface of the slab in strict conformance with the manufacturer's specifications. According to ASTM Guidelines. the water vapor retarded should consist of a vapor retarded sheeting underlain by a minimum of 4-inches of compacted clew❑ (less than 5 percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sievc). open -graded coarse rock of Y,-inch maximum sire. The vapor retarded sheeting should be protected from puncture damage_ The product warranties and interaction with other products should be evaluated prior to including it in the project specifications and bid documents. For the design of the slab -on -grade floors, we estimate a value ccqual to 200 pei (pounds per cubic inch) may be considered appropriate for the modulus of sub -grade reaction (k;). Since typical slab -on -grade floors are not reinforced with steel_ the potential for temperature and shrinkage crack control needs to be addressed. Temperature and shrinkage cracking can be mitigated either by limiting the distance between control joints and!or by providing welded wire mesh in the slab. if a welded wire mesh is used then we recommend the use of 6 x 6-W 1 A x W 1.4 WWM welded wire Me,,;]]. It is imperative that the mesh is located at lite center of the slab, or it will not fulfill its intended function. Structural Fill The on -site fine �-Yrained soils are not suitable for placement as structural fill and should be removed. We recommend that we sample any imported fill material prior to placement to conduct necessary laboratory tests. We recommend that all fill be placed on a firm. horizontal sub -grade that is free of organic material_ standing water. loose soils or debris. The fill should be placed in horizontal, maxitrrurn eight (8) inch loose lifts and be compacted to at least 95% of the ASTM D 1557 maximum dry density value. We recommend that we be engaged to provide contirnrorts inspection and testing of fills to verify proper placement and compaction of stnuctural fills. Parking and Drivewav Pavement Design Our mialysis of pavement sections were based on design procedures outlined in the 1986 AASHTO Design Manual rind our experience with pavement sections in this area subjected to similar traffic loads. The analysis was based on UBR and resilient modulus (Mr) values estimated from the results of our field investigation as well as previous experience with similar soil types, and on the assumption that the sub -grade for the proposed parking and driveways would be prepared in conformance with the recommendation in the preceding sections. We have not been provided with traffic frequency and axle load configurations for the design of the parking, lot pavement. The design ESAI.s (Equivalent Single Axle Loads) used in the analysis are estimated and are based on the inference that the proposed pavement will be utilized primarily by light traffic. We have developed a pavement section based on the subsurface soil conditions encountered in test borings. and based on our experience with soils of similar gradation and consistency. A CBR value of 9 has been assumed for the flexible pavement design. This CBR value corresponds to a resilient modulus (MR) value of 7.200 psi. Pavement des[,-,n procedures are hayed on the strength properties of the stab -grade and pa�cinent materials_ glom, Evilh the desi(_,n traffic conditions. Considering that the traffic mix 1011 generally include passenger cars. vnns_ hi -flit duty trucks. and 18.000 lh_ simile axle delivery trucks. a liolil duty flexible pavement section is recommended for the gencral parking areas. and rioid sections are recommended for the loading unloading areas where heavy traffic is anticipated. A proper drainage system is essential for the adequate perfformance of pavement. The drainage systeM should be designed lot the rapid removal of water both from the pavement surface and from the pavement section below. The lollowing flexible pavement section should be used for the general parking areas_ and rigid pavement sections should be used for the loadingunloading and fueling island areas. The following table is summarizes out- recommendation. Table 2: Recommended Pavement Sections Pavement Sec:tion,Design Flexible Section Flexible Section Rigid Section Rigid Section Materials Parking lot Truck Truck Fueling Island areas Driveway areas Driveway areas , area Asphaltic Concrete Surfacing 2 in. 3 in_ - - ((.'lass B) Portland Cement Concrete - - Gin. 6 in. with wire mesh 1'/a inch Crushed Aggregate 6 in. fi in. 6 in. 6 in. Base Course 12 in. 12 in. Tota] Thickness in Inches S in. 9 in. The construction specifications for paving areas should include Washington State Department of - Transportation specifications for surface and base course material selection. All base course materials shall be placed and mechanically compacted to a non -yielding state. We recommend that the base course material conform to file ctnrent WASDOT Standard for .Aggregate Base of the Washington Standard for Paving. The "ranular base course material shall be mechanically compacted to at least 95",t, of the maximum dry density value as determined by ASTM D -1557 test procedures. Site and Building Drainage The presence of silty soils at the site indicates drainage should be provided for the perimeter foundations of the proposed kiosk building. The foundation drainage system should consist of' a rrrinimum fixrr (4) inch diameter. pertorated. rigid pipe placed (perforations downwards) along the exterior base of the foundation perimeter and tightlined to a storm drain system or other suitable outlet. The pipe should be bedded on at least two (2) inches of pea gravel and backfilled with a minimum of- (1 2) inches of pca gravel. In order to minimize the risk- of storm water backflow into footing drains. Nve recommend that roof do,mispouts be tightlined to a storm drain system or other suitable outlet separately from the footing brains. The site should be graded so that surf'lce water runoff is directed to catch basins, v-1tich are attached ttr a storm se«c;r drain Or other suitable outlet. If de�Naterirw dru-inu construction is necessary. construction-dewaterin procedures must include routine of N� atcr to a suitable outlet. Within excavations. we recommend that de\vatering include routing of water- to sump areas. from where it may be pu nped to a suitable outlet. ,ONSTRUCTION MONITORING We recommend that \ve be engaged to observe grading activities during construction, observe the stability of excavations. observe the installation of drainage system, and to observe and test the placement of structural till in structural areas requires{ for raising the grades. A representative of Krazan & Associates, Inc. should he present to confirm suitable bearing soil in foundation and slab areas, and prior to placement of structural fill and/or concrete. This representative can also verify that tltc intent of these recommendations is incorporated into the project design and construction. Krayan & Associates. Inc. IN ill not be responsible for tirades or staking. since this is the responsibility of the Prime Contractor, FUrtherrtlore. Krazan & Associates. Inc. is not responsible for the contractor's procedures. methods. scheduling or management of the work site. GENERAL We recornmcnd that \ve be engaged to review the final project plans to verify that our recommendatinns have been properly interpreted and incorporated in the plans. The recommendations provided herein are based on our understanding of the project at this time. We should be engaged to review the final plans and work with you during their development in order to provide altered, augmented, or more detailed geotcchnical recommendations as required. Additionally. we recommend that we be engaged to monitor all excavations. site preparation and earthwork so that .ve can provide on -site recommendations should any adverse soil and'or groundwater conditions be encountered. This report has been prepared fir the exclusive use of The Kroger Company, for specific application to the proposed Fred Meyer gas station project located at 17801 108'h Avenue SE, in Renton. Washington. in accordance with teenerally accepted soils and foundation engineering practices. We recommend that a representative of' Krazan & Associates. Inc. be engaged to confirm bearing soils and observe drainage installation. These reconiniendations are for engineering review. and go beyond anv testing agency ins olvenaent. N%hich may be required. MITATIONS GeoteChnlcal Fn-inecring is one of the newest divisions of Cavil Engineering. This branch of" Civil Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and understanding of earth sciences improves. Although your sits 1..Nas analyzed using the most appropriate current techniques and methods. undoubtedly there will be substantial future itnprsfvements in this branch of engineering. In addition to improvements in the field of geotechnical engineering, physical changes in the site either due to excavation or fill placement. new agency regulations or possible changes in the proposed structure after the time of completion of the soils report may require the soils report to be professionally reviewed_ In light of' this. the oVIner should be aware that there is a practical ]unit to the usefulness of this report Nvithout critical review. Althou,h the time limit for this revie\e is strictly arbitrary, it is su�)�)ested that Iwo years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this report. Foundation and earthwork construction is characterised by the presence of -a calculated risk that soil and 17roundNiatcr conditions ha+e heen full- re\ealed by the original foundation in�csti4gation. This risk is derived from the practical necessity of basing interpretations and design conclusions on limited sampling of the earth. Our report. design conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Actual subsurfrce conditions may differ. sometimes significantly_ from those indicated in this report. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that soil conditions do not Van, significantly from those disclosed during our field investigation. The findings and conclusions of this report can be al'fccted by the passage of time_ such as seasonal weather conditions. rnanmade influences. such as construction on or adjacent to the site. natural cyents such as earthquakes_ slope instability. flooding, or groundwater fluctuations. If any variations or undesirable conditions arc encountered during construction, the geotechnical engineer should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. Misinterpretations of this report by other design learn members can result in project delays and cost overruns. These risks can be reduced by having Krazan & Associates. Inc. involved «xith the design reams meetings and discussions aftcr submitting the report. Krazan & Associates_ Inc. should also be retained for rep ickving, pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret this report. To reduce this. risk Krazan & .Associates. Inc. should participate in pre -bid and preconstruction ieetings. and provide construction observations daring the site work. Tltis report is a g otechnica] engineering investigation with the purpose of"evaluating (lie soil conditions in terttts of foundation design. The scope of our services did not include any environmental site assessment for the presence or absence of hazardous and/or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater or atmosphere. or the presence of wetlands. Any statements or absence of'statements. in this report or on any boring log regarding odors. unusual or suspicious items, or conditions observed are strictly for descriptive purposes and are not intended to convey engineering judgment regarding potential hazardous - and/or toxic assessments The geotechnical conclusions and recommendations presented herein are based upon professional interpretation of the data obtained from borings conducted for an environmental study previously utilizing standard engineering practices and a degree of conservatism deemed proper for this project. It is not warranted that such infornrrtion and interpretation cannot be superseded by future geoteclirtical developments. We emphasize that this report is valid for this project as outlined above, and should not be used for anv other site. The nature and extent of variations may not become evident until construction. If Variations them appear- Nve should be requested to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report and to modif"N or verify them in writing before proceeding with the construction. We expect the on -site soil conditions to reflect our findings. however. some variations may occur. Should soil and groundwater conditions be encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, Krazan & Associates- Inc should be contacted immediately to determine if additional or alternate recommendations are required - Our report is prepared for the exclusive use ofour client. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance lit writing If VOL] lla%'e WIN, questions. or if %,,e may be of Further assistance_ please do riot hesitate to contact our oll-icc sit (425) 4X5-55 19. Rcspectfully Submitted. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Anijad 1. Khan. P.1=.G., P.G. Regional Manager Professional Services Group GEO'1 FCIi\ICAI, F\GI\Ei?RI\(. 1\VFS-'IGA 170\ FRED IMEN'FR GAS S'fATIO\ 17801 108"' AN ENUE SC RLvvo\, WASHINGTON PROJEc. r NO.042-08040 APRIL 14. 2008 Prepared for: TIFF KKOGER CONIPAM 3800 SE 22�" A\, ENUE POR 1 L1 N D- OREGON 97202 Prepared by: KRAZA\ & ASSOCIATES, 1\C. GFO"I F(:I1\ICAL EN(:1\I:F.RI\6 DIN ISIO\ 11715 NORTH CKL1-K PARKWAY So._ Sir. C-106 BoillU.L_ WASHING-10N 98011 (425)485-5519 APPENDIX B FIELD INVESTIGATION Field InvestiLyation Appendix R P.t�c i3. I The field investigation consisted of reliance on subsurface information collected earlier for a Phase If Lnvirontrtenial Site Assessment. The approximate exploratory boring locations are shown on tlic site plan. The depths shown on the attached boring logs are from the existing ground surface at the time the horiniss were excavated. The soils encountered were logged in the field during the exploration and. with supplementary laboratory test data, are described in accordance with the Unified Sol] Classification System (USCS). All samples were returned to our Bothell laboratory for evaluation. The logs of the exploratory borings alone �a ith the laboratory' test results are presented in this appendix. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Hle%en Offices Senine the Weston lluited Stakrs Lam® APPENDIX B EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Appendix B f at-,c 13.4 When the text of the report conflicts with the general specifications in this appendix- the recommendations in the report have precedence. SCOPE OF WORK: These specifications and applicable plans pertain to anti include all earthwork associated with the site rough grading, including but not limited to the furnishing of all labor. tools. and equipment necessary for site clearing and grubbing. stripping, preparation of foundation materials for receiving fill. excavation. processing, placement and compaction of fill and backfill materials to the lines and grades shown on the project grading plans, and disposal of excess materials. PERFORMANCE: The Contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthworks in accordance with the project plans and specifications. ']'his work shall be inspected and tested by a representative of Krazan and Associates. Inc.. hereinafter known as the Geotechnical Engineer and.'or Testint) Agency. Attainment of design grades v�hen achieved shall be certified to by the project Ciyil Engineer. Both the Geotechnical Engineer and Civil engineer are the Owners representatives. If the contractor should fail to meet the technical or design requirements embodied in this document and on the applicable plans, he shall make the necessary readjustments until all work is deemed satisfactory as determined by both the Geotechnical Engineer and Ci% it Engirnccr. No deviation from these specifications shall be made except upon written approval of' the t ieolechnical Engineer, Civil Engineer or project .Architect. No earthwork shall be performed without the physical presence or approval of the Gcotec:hnical Engineer. The Contractor shall notify the Geotechnical Engineer at least 2 workin4- days prior to the commCnccrnent of any aspect of the site carthwork- The Contractor a4-rees that he shall assume sole and complete responsibility for fob site conditions during the course of construction of this project, including safety of all persons and property, that this rcytiircmcni shall apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours: and that the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Owner and the E.neineers harmless from any and all liability. real or alleged. in connection with the performance of work on this project. except for liability_ arising from the sole negligence of the {honer of the Engineers. TECHNICAL, REQUIREMENTS: All compacted materials shall be densified to a density not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557 as specified in the technical portion of the Geotechnical Engineering Report. The results of -these tests and compliance with these specifications shall be the basis upon which satisfactory completion of work will be judged by the Geotechnical Engineer. SOIL AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS: The Contractor is presumed to have visited the site and to have familiarized himself with existing site conditions and the contents of the data presented in the soil report. Krazan and Associates, Inc. Fle�cn Offices Servin The 1%estern United States Appendix 13 pm"C B,4 The Contractor shall make his own interpretation of the data contained in said report. and the Contractor shall not be rehevcd of liability anider the contractor for anv loss sustained as a result of any variance between conditions indicated by or deduced from said report and the actual conditions encountered during the progress of the work. DUST CONTROL: The -work includes dust control as required for the alleviation or prevention of any dust nuisance on or about the site or the borrow area, or off -site if caused by tite Contractor's operation either durin4- the performance of the earthwork or resulting from the conditions in which the Contractor leap es the site. The Contractor shal l assume all liability, including (hurt costs of codefendants. for all c€aims related to dust or windblown materials attributable to his worts. SITE PREPARATION Site preparation shall consist of site clearing and grabbing and preparations of foundation materials for receiving' kill. CLEARING AND GRUBBING:: The Contractor shall accept the site in this present condition and shall demolish and'or remote from the area of"designated project. earthwork all structures. both surface and subsurface. trees. brush. roots. debris. organic matter. and all other matter determined by the Cicotechnical En -nicer to he deleterious. Such materials shall become tite property of the Contractor - and shall be removed from the site. f tee tool sysicros in proposed building areas should be removed to a min-]m111n depth of 3 feet and to such an cxtcnt, which would permit removal of all roots larger than 1 -]rich. Tree root removed in Parkin,, areas may be limited to the upper 1'/2 feet of the ground surface. Backlill or tree root excavation should not be permitted until all exposed surfaces .have been inspected and the Gcotech.nical Fnoineer is present k[}r the proper control of backftll placement and compaction. liurning in areas. which are to receive fill materials. shall not be permitted. SUBGRADE PREPARATION: Surfaces to receive Structural fill shall be prepared as outlined above. excavated scarified to a depth of 12 inches. moisture -conditioned as necessary. and compacted to 95 Percent compaction. Loose and: or areas of disturbed soils shall be moisture conditioned and compacted to 95 percent compaction. All ruts. hummocks. or other uneven surface features shall be removed by surface grading prior to placement of any fill material. All areas. which are to receive fill materials. shall be approved by the Gcotcchnical En-ineer prior to the placement of any of the fill material. EXCAVATION: All excavation shall be accomplished to the tolerance normally defined by the Civil Engineer as shown on the project grading plans. All over excavation below the grades specified shall be backlillcd at the Contractor's expense and shall be compacted in accordance with the applicable technical requirements. DILL AND BACKFILL MATERIAL: No material shall be moved or compacted without the presence of the 0cotcchnical Fngineer. Material from the required site excavation Mal, be utilized for construction site fills provided prior approval is given by the Geolechnical Pngineer. All materials utilized for constructing, site fills shall be free from ve�,ctablc or other dcicrcrious matter as determined by the (aeoicchnical Engineer. Krazan and Associates, Inc. hleven offices Senn ing The Western United SIMCS r)v_ -r �-aa<. Lill Appendix L3 Pane R.4 PLACEMENT, SPREADING AND CONIPACTION: The placement and spreading ol"approved fil[ materials and the processing and compaction of' approved fill and native materials shall be the responsibility o€'the Contraclor. However, compaction of'fill materials by flooding, ponding. or jetting, shall not be permitted unlesti tipccilically approved by local code, as well as the Geotechnical Engineer. Both cut and till shall be surface compacted to the satisfaction of the Gcoicchuical Engineer prior to final acceptance. SEASONAL LIMITS: No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled while it is frozen or thawing or during unfavorable wet weather conditions. When the work is interrupted by heavy rains. fill operations shall not be resumed until the Geotechnical Engineer indicates that the moisture content and density of previously placed fill are as specified. I{razan and Associates, Inc. Elden Ort1ces Serkine the Wcatern United Stales APPENDIX C PAVE.MEN"1 SPECIFICATIONS 1. DEFINITIONS The term"pavemcnt" shall include asphalt concrete surfacing. unuWatcd aggregate base. and aggrcgarc subbase. The term " subgradc" is that portion of" the area on which surfacing. base. or subhase is to be Placed. 2, SCOPE OF WORK —This portion ofthe %cork shall include all labor, materials. tools and cquipmcnt necessary for and reasonable incidental to the completion of the pa%emcnt shown on the plans and as herein specified. except work specifically notes as "Work Not Included." 3, PREPARATION' OF THE SUBGRADE — The C'onlractor shall prepare the surtacc of the various Subgradcs receiving subsequent pa%rmcnt courses to the lines. grade~_ and dimensions giti cn on the plans_ '1 he upper 12 inches of the soil sobgrsde beneath the paccment section shall be compacted to a rninimurn compaction of 95�'�, of maximum dr.- density as determined by test method ASTM 1)1557. The finished subgrades shall be tested and approved by the Geutechnical Engineer prior to the placement of additional pavement of additional pavement courses. 4. AGGREGATE BASE — The aggregate base shall be spread and compacted on the prepared subgrade in conformity ,viih the hFics, grades, and dimensions shown on the plans The a,>grcgste base should conform to ]DOT Standard Specification for C rUSIMf Surfacing Base Course or Top Course. The base material shall be compacted to a minimum compaction of 95°,;, as determined by ASTM Dl1 57. Each layer of subbase shall be tested and approved by the Geotechnical Lngineer prior to the placcmcnt Of,ueccssrvc layers. 5. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SURFACING - Asphaltic concrete surfrcing shall consist of a mixture of mineral aggregate and paying grade asphalt, mixed at central mixing plant and spread and compacted can a prepared base in conformity with the lines_ tirades. and dimensions shown on the plans. The viscosity grade of the asphalt shall be AR-4000. The mineral aggregate shall be MOT 1 2 inch 11MA. The drving, proportionirnz. and mixing of the materials shall conform to ]DOT Specifications. The prime coat_ spreading and compacting equipment, and spreading and compacting the mixture shall conform to ID01 Specifications. with the exception that no surface course shall be placed when the atmospheric temperature is below 50 degrees F. The surfacin- shall' be rolled with combination steel-t.heel and pneumatic rollers. as described in IDOT Specifications. The surface course shall be placed with an approved self-propelled mechanical spreading and finishing machine. 6. TACK COAT — The tack (mixing type asphaltic emulsion) shall conform to and be applied in accordance with the requirements of IDOT Specifications_ Krazan and Associates, Inc, 1-1e+re11Offices Scnine-the %' csrerri t'nircd Stoic., Ole: 1= ill 101 26 30 re venemlcd from G 1=arth PrOiccl Silt 12 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES 11715 N Creek Parkway S. Bothell, «'A 98011 425-485-5519 97 395 F ICURE 1. SITE VICINITY MAP Location: Renton, NVashin lon ,fob No.: 094-07022 Client: Fred tilerer Date: 7/3/2007 ole: Fj�,mre eeneraled from Goo_flc Lamh KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES FIGURE 2: SITE. LOCATION 11715 N Creek ParkiNay S. PLAID Bothell, OVA 98011 Location: ncation: Renton, 'Washington1 o h No. .094-0702'2 Client: Fred ;Me%er Date: 7/3/2007 1 E`+ _ d aY "f ye j 3 $ _ �¢ ��( It. 3 Lf/ h fi qq R b{� y 2` ui olce I inure gcncratcd from C;oogle Earth FIGURE 3: KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES BORING/MONITORING 1715 N Creek Parkes-av S. WELL LOCATION PLAN Bothell, N A 98011 Location: Renton, Washington 425-485-5519 lob No.: 094-07022 Client: Fred Meier Date: 8/17/2007 Krazan & Associates ETB-I Page I .......-- - - -- Fied Meyer Benson Plaza 094-07022 Driller: Gregory Drilling Drilling Date: Time: -{ --- -- -- ------ Drill Method: HSA Sample Method: Split Spoon -- Started: I 614fO7 Finished: Borehoid Diameter: 6" Water Level : NE Logged By: Andrea Donnell Checked By: Jason Souza I w y ❑ s i 0 -a o o I LL 0 c� a Materials Description N 0 0.0' - 0,25' Asphalt 0.25' - 0.5' Gravel Base Material Silty Sand: Fine to medium grained sand j with silt, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, I m moist to wet, medium dense to very dense. Uncontrolled Fill 1 80 s-17 1s O.Oppm " 5 8 2 80 6-12-14 O.Oppm 10 �r 0 N N i O ' n 3 80 ! 6-1: IO2ppm 15 LL I 4 80 3-10-12 f O.Oppm 20 IT e } 5 80 10-12-171O.Oppm 25- och � J R N I 6 80 28-30-501 'O-Oppm 30 End of Boring: 31.5' -- I Krazan & Associates ETB-2 Page 2 - Fret! Meyer Benson Plaza 094-07022 - f Driller: Gregory Drilling Drilling f Date: i Time: Drill Method: HSA Started: I 615/07 - Sample Method: Split Spoon _ Finished: I t3orehold Diameter: 6" 1 Water Level : NE Logged By: Andrea Donnell Checked By: Jason Souza O J s a W a i Materials Description I v 3 o 0 C 4 - 0.25' Asphalt 0.25' - 0.5' Gravel Base Material I _0.0' 0-5'- 24.0' Silty Sand: Fine to medium grained sand j �... with sill, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, � t .: wet, medium dense to dense. Uncontrolled Fill g I I " { 1 80 8-8-10 0.3ppm 5 2 80 12-8-15 f 0.7ppm ` r Il i 3 80 �,8 6 O.5ppm 4 80 17-25 23 0.2ppm ' 5 80 I U11 - - — " 24.0' - 31.5' Glacial Till: Fine to medium grained silty G' 5014' 1.Opprn 25 A^ p sand with some gravel, gray, moist to wet, very dense. G �A G 1 _A 6 80 33-5015"0.3ppm 30 ova °- ^ - ----- - W _ End of Baring: 31.5' Krazan & Associates ETB-3 Page 3 _.. ._.. . I Fred iooyer Benson Plaza 094-07022 i- Driller. Gregory Drilling Drilling Date_ - Time-. j Drill Method: HSA Started 615107 Sample Method: Split Spoon Finished; Borehold Diameter: 6" Water Level : NE Logged By: Andrea Donnell Checked By: Jason Souza - - - 71 L a y 3 a I O ! x E o � .2 sc Materials Description E W u o Cn a a p a MI o f ! a)l x I Off- 0.25' Asphalt 0.25' - 0.5' Gravel Base Material {{ 0.25' -13.0' Poorly Graded Sand: With silt, minor } gravel, grey, moist, loose to medium dense. `r Uncontrolled fill. c 1 80 5-5-4 0.5ppm " 5 I 2 80 19-10-13 1 0.2ppm N 6 I 3 80 7-11-23 0.2ppm W m LL E a u c d I I a l 4 j 80 8-12-25 1 0.6ppm i 13.0' - 24.0' Silty Sand: Fine to medium grained sand with silt, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, wet, medium dense to dense. Uncontrolled Fill ) — 0 24.0' - 31,5' Glacial Till: Fine to medium grained silty 5 80 5015" 0.2ppm 4 25 ��A send with some gravel, gray, moist to wet, very dense. L. U A 4 d , n d A 6 80 5t}13" 0.3ppm 30 e A JA n End of Boring: 31.5' --._-_-J Krazan & Associates ETB-4 Page 4 1 Fred Meyer Benson Plaza I _ 094-07022 — - - -- --- - ^! Driller: Gregory Drilling trilling Date: Time: Drill Method: HSA ��- Started 615107 Sample Method: Split Spoon j Flnlshed: Borehold Diameter: 6" J Water Level : NE Logged By: Andrea Donnell Checked By: Jason Souza 1' .. ... w j E C Q .9 Materials Description _q (D V} O C :E EY 0.0' - 0:25 Asphalt 025 - 0.5' Gravel Base Material Poorly Graded Sand: With silt, minor I i gravel, grey, moist, medium dense. Uncontrolled Fill, u ' 0 I � i r 1 60 3-9-12 0.3ppm " 5 r� o� N 2 My G 6 91 N N 3 E 0 u ten. 4 Q S 7 L 5 d r U 0 n 80 4-3-3 OAppm 10 80 10-17-30 0.3ppm 15 i k 80 21-23-41 D.Oppm 20 7.0' - 12.0' Silty Sand: Fine to medium grained sand with silt, minor gravel, abundant organics, mottled, brown/red, moist, loose. Uncontrolled Fill. 12.0' - 24.0. Silty Sand: Fine to medium grained sand with silt, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, wet, dense to very dense. Uncontrolled Fill. i 4 A 24.0' - 31.5' Glacial Till: Fine to medium grained silty 25 n o w v BO 130-5f)/6- 0.3ppm A sand with same gravel, gray, moist t et, very dense. 6 80 24-35-42 L 0.2ppm A i e� A $e ❑� e n 3D a A Al A End of Boring: 31.5' 35 I I Krazan &Associates ETB-5 Page 5 - Fred Meyer Bensot Plaza 094-07022 --- - — - - -_. - - - Driller: Gregory Drilling f Drilling Date: I Time - Drill Method: HSA Started: 6/4147 Sample Method: Split Spoon Finished: "- - -- Borehold Diameter; 6" Water Level : NE Lagged By: Andrea Donnell ', Checked By -.Jason Souza c o w E CL Materials Description o o A a tY 0.0' - 1.0' Grass underlain by topsoil. r 1.0' - 14.0' Silty Sand: Fine to medium grained sand I with silt, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, - wet, loose to very dense. Uncontrolled Fill I t 80 1 6-4-3 O e' 2 so n w 0 N M 3 84 W E U U I O.Oppm . 5 14-25-32 O.Oppm V7 5018" O.Oppm 1 -' 4 i 80 34-5061 O.Oppm 20 N A i O 5 80 5015" O.Qppm 25�� u ' al 41I A 7 I j A f 4 I A -A L 6 1 80 50/4" O.Oppm 30 A A JAl �� 1 - � 35 14.0' - 31.5' Glacial Till: Fine to medium grained silly sand with some gravel, gray, moist to wet, very dense - End of Boring: 31.5' Groundwater was encountered after the hole sat open for a while Krazan & Associates # ETB-6 Page 6 --. ----- --- Fred Meyer Benson Plaza 094-07022 Driller: Gregory Drilling Date: i Drilling-- . Time: i 1-brill Method: HSA Started: 614107 Sample Method: Split Spoon Finished: Borehold Diameter: 6" 1 water level : NE Logged By: Andrea Donnell ecked By: Jason Souza N p y —i 3 oU 0 Materials Description, w 3 m 0.0' - 0.25' Asphalt 0.25' - 0.5' Gravel Base Material . -} I i 0-5- 24-0' Silly Sand: Fine to medium grained sand i m with silt, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, moist to wet, medium dense to very dense. "T Uncontrolled Fill 1 80 3-5-6 0.3ppm 5 o 2 80 113-22-.33 0.3ppm 10 m ro 0 d 3 80 22-20-24I0.0ppm 15T. iz o V S I _ TT 4 m 4 80 14-24.50/6'0-0ppm 20 1 A .6 24.0 - 31-5' Glacial Till: Fine to medium grained silty u 5 60 `45-5013" O.Oppm 25 sand with some gravel, gray, moist to wet, very dense- k � ,Q ti 41 b G 3 p A � 6 80 5o/6" O.Oppm 30 noel n. End of Boring: 31.5' I Krazan & Associates ETB-9 Page 7 - Fred Meyer Benson Plaza j 094-01022 Driller: Gregory Drilling Drilling Date: Time: Drill Method: HSA Started 614107 Sample Method: Split Spoon Finished: Borehold Diameter: 6" T Water Level : NE Logged By, Andrea Donnell f Checked By Jason Souza !CL o A Materials Description rn a a I m m _ 0,0' - 0.25' Asphalt 0.25' - 0.5' Gravel Base Material v 0.5' - 25.5' Silty Sand: Fine to medium grained sand z with silt, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, jmoist to wet, medium dense to very dense. Uncontrolled Rill 1 aO I S 1 D 7 0.6ppm 80 7-12-12 0.Oppm 10 80 10-17-23 O.Oppm 15 80 7-18-27 O.Oppm cv 80 12-18-24 I 6 80 10-20-19 ' I O.Oppm 25 P�A25.5- 31.5' Glacial Till: Fine to medium grained silty sand with some gravel, gray, wet, dense. k A e e e -n n e O.Oppm: 30 �A e e� - n . End of Boring: 31.5' - - W--- Krazan & Associates i ETB-10 I Page a Fred Meyer Benson Plaza 094-07022 Driller: Gregory Drilling Drilling Date_ Time: Drill Method: HSA Started: � 615/07 Finished. � Sample Method: Split Spoon r-- Borehold Diameter: 6" Water Level : NE Logged By: Andrea Donnell Checked By. Jason Souza � I a ? 0 LL u Materials Description .; O-0' - 0.25' Asphalt 0,25' - 0.5' Gravel Base Material 0.25' - 7.0' Poorly Graded Sand: With silt, minor I c gravel, grey, moist, dense. uncontrolled fill, i 113 11.3ppm ' 1 80 15-18 ' 5 - }} [:1 80 ; 2-5-7 j 1.2ppm f 10 80 27-50/5" 80 50/5- 1.Oppm I 1 2 2.Oppm 20 7.0 24-0' Silly Sand: Fine to medium grained sand with silt, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, wet, loose to very dense. Uncontrolled Fill 4-0' - 3t-5' Gfaciaf Till: Fine to medium grained silly 80 134-5016" 25ppm 25 A` sand with some gravel, gray, moist to wet, very dense. ❑. tlAI Ili A 4 80 17-30-32 1.5ppm 30 A End of Boring: 31.5' e -- Krazan Associates ETB-11 Page s - - -- -- I Fred Meyer Benson Plaza 094.07022 i Driller: Gregory Drilling Drilling i Date: Time: Drill Method: H5E► � Started: 6J5107 Sample Method. Split Spoon Finished: Borehold Diameter. 6" Water Level : HE Logged By: Andrea Donnell Checker! By: Jason Souza ! OL o LL Q Materials Description o IL Iri flq t7 rl' 0 25' As hail 0 25' 0 5' Gravel Base Material 1 of!f I 2 G A OI NO N e R w 4 V U L V 4 y 7 rt N L r 2 U g �I 80 8-8-7 10.8ppm . 5 80 5-3-4 10.7ppm I 10 80 1 3-5.7 10.2ppm 80 15 T 20 25 30 J 35 Silty Sand: Fine to medium grained sand h silt, some gravel, minor organics, mottled, brown, t to saturated, medium dense to loose. icontrolied Fill d of Boring: 21.5' Printed: 06-18-2008 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA08-061 06/18/2008 03:37 PM Total Payment: 1,500.00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Receipt Number: Payee: KROGER Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81-00.000" Environmental Review 500.00 5020 000.345.81.00.001;' Site Plan Approval 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 3275366 1,000.00 Payment Check 3275367 500.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00,0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000,345.81,00,0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05,519.90,42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Balance Due _00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 _00 .00 .00 _00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 _00 _00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ;'VELOPMENT PLANNING ^1TY of RE:.NTDN J U N 18 2008 RECEIVED R0803217 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00