Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREPORT 012C TEMP. ACCESS EASEMENT — — j�TI tj 10 cp. ig to � Il S 9 Et • : 8 • � 24' � �3. gam.. . ; ; ..... 8.#.95` . In x r Y \ p6� F' ;u j .......... 7.671$4',..................... . }p 26' 24' 28' RoQ0.0' L-19.17' �m3Eim ...�............... .. "3D.Q• I 7253' € ��l77' � ' 27 :e,6 — M 37" W NS Sth STREET TRACT A TO 'BE OWNED ANC MAINTAINED J z� � BY :10MEOWNERS ASSCCIATICN. w o 0 20 40 84 al w �I f inch = 40 feet `� i 84.83' en Denis law Mayor `Ay r city of l f � - 1 September 8, 2011 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Mr. Darrell Offe, P.E. 13932 SE 159`h Place Renton, WA 98053-3412 RE: Street Modification Request — Field Avenue NE and NE 6t" Street Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Off e: We have reviewed your street modification request for the street improvements associated with a proposed 14 lot preliminary plat on the northwest corner of NE 6" St and Field Av NE. Your request is to modify the street standards for this project to reduce the pavement width to 26 feet, and to use the additional right-of-way for planting strips. The modification is requested in response to new city standards for planting strips and narrower pavement sections for residential streets. We approve the requested modifications. The new street improvements for NE 6" Street adjacent to the preliminary plat development can be modified to reduce the pavement width to 26 feet, and provide a minimum 6-foot wide planting strip between the new curb and new 5-foot wide sidewalk. The street improvements for Field Avenue NE are also modified to allow for a reduction in the new pavement width to 26 feet, with a minimum width planting strip of five feet. Street trees must be included in both new planting strips, and parking limited to one side of the street for both street frontages. If you have any further questions regarding street improvement or drainage requirements for this project, please contact Arneta Henninger at 425-430-7298 or ahenninger@rentonwa..ov . Sincerely, Neil Watts, Director Development Services Director cc: Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor Arneta Henninger, Plan Reviewer Renton City HaR • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa_gov H',D\E"BROO L L - ,.-_E /'r T_F,,P. EAS7F.ICf4T TO ETE VACAW' D UPON EXTEN;ID\' D" FI-LDS AND CPA P.M AvE TO NE 7T-i STREET _-1i _FF,1 - J --I-- f�1 ��( E.JJ_..E F\SL�VlTNT SAVE R�'V _ `-- --------n -_--_ n FIELDS — \WIDTH AS PREL. -LAT I 02 32' h m u J 85.24' I In 32' -iAN SANE J u 83 23' 85.23'Li J ` / ?2 32' \ w ; zo'LL a n z �a77' Ul S I AREA: FL i)�. z t?`.i.21' EDI%Alf":� ?:i,"�4 ��. F"T. I. 2..,6 G i _ 13ALANCL: 33,744 SQ. FT. DEfN`il `: 'S/1-9 I -77 Sp v 6. h! S I h F s April 22, 2007 Mr. Peter Hahn Deputy Administrator of Planning, Building, Public Works Department -Transportation City of Renton 1055 Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: NE 6th Street at Elma Avenue NE Traffic Concern as it pertains to Blueberry Place Townhomes Dear Mr. Hahn, I am very happy that the investigation of our traffic concerns determined that a stop sign at our location is needed, but I am quite surprised after viewing the site that the determination was to give the right of way to NE 6th St, even though standard practice is to put a stop sign on the minor street. NE 6th St was put in as a private, curving dead end entrance. Blueberry Place's builders designed the layout of our complex, not with the possibility of NE 6th St being extended one day, but with how it existed at the time: a greenbelt area. Because of this, changing it into a through street not only creates visibility problems exiting our complex, but the portion being extended is a hill, which is another potential problem for us, and there is also the issue of our gate code stanchion, and gate sensors. Apparently, the Traffic Operations Section failed to notice these problems, or surely they would have seen that in our case Elma Ave NE (our entrance street) needs to be given the right of way going both cast and west on NE 6th St. The department should have observed the following problems: 1) It is a blind corner at the proposed stop sign point. Because NE 6th St was designed as a dead end entrance, Blueberry Place's fencing and property line of trees bordering that corner now block the eastbound view. After stopping at the stop sign, a driver must move onto NE 6"' St in order to see oncoming pedestrian or car traffic. It's possible that a pedestrian could step into the driver's path. 2) Our gate is operated by sensors. While the sensor on the inside of our complex keeps the gate open while cars are going through, it would not sense a car outside the gate stopped at the stop sign waiting for traffic to clear. There could be a potential problem if one or more cars were stuck at the stop sign waiting for traffic, and a car was in the way when the gate started to close. 3) When the NE 6th St extension is completed it will be a downhill at the point westbound traffic approaches our entrance heading for Duvall Ave NE. Townhomes are going to be very close to the extension, and the wall along the street will be low. For that reason, and because of Blueberry Place's lack of visibility at our entrance corner, a stop sign is needed to slow down traffic. We also feel speed bump(s) should be installed. 4) With a stop sign on our east side, one will also be needed on our entrance's west side for the safe egress from Blueberry Place, and to regulate the backups at the gate code stanchion caused by people waiting to enter our complex. Page 2 I am actually quite amazed that, if your Traffic Operations Section actually came out and did a thorough onsite investigation, they did not see these problems, and come to the same conclusions. Our situation is not the norm. I am very aware that a city government's mindset is hard to change, and that it is easy to make an automatic, cursory decision because that's how it is always done, but the bottom line is the safety of Blueberry Place residents, and everyone else who will be traveling on NE 0 St. For all the reasons I have laid out, it is obvious that Blueberry Place needs to have the right of way on each side of our entrance. It is my sincere hope that having brought these facts to your attention again you will take another look at our situation, and will thoroughly reinvestigate these serious, and very valid issues, and will make a decision that truly addresses and deals with our unique situation. Having insisted NE 61h St be extended, it is the City of Renton's responsibility to be aware of every traffic concern resulting from its decision, and take the correct measures to ensure the safety of everyone. As it stands now, we are very concerned that the extension of NE 6th St will mean having to worry about our safety each time we enter or leave our community. Sincerely, Kay Haynes President, Blueberry Place Homeowners Association 551 Elma Place NE Renton, WA 98059 Enclosures cc: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Terri Briere, City Council President Jill Ding, Sr. Planner -Development Services C. Thomas Foster, Langley Development Group Blueberry Place Board of Directors City enton Department of Planning I Building / I 'Narks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Gef_COMMENTS-DUE: FF DECEMBER 15, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-143, Piz, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DEC fl06 APPLICANT: Marc Rousso PROJECT MANAGE Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: Hone brook Circle Preliminary Plat PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninger �^ SITE AREA: 108,972 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NiA LOCATION: 49XX NE 6" Street WORK ORDER NO: 77677 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary _Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. - A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animats Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hUGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistonclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ('�\ 'n �� uv'�J- (-+ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I -0'? March 20, 2007 ��Ecop Cl7Y OF REFN 6,,j ING Mr. Peter Hahn MAR 2 1 200? Deputy Administrator of Planning, Building, Public Works Department — Transportation �rV� City of Renton 1055 Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Traffic safety concerns and measures needed regarding the NE 6th St extension in conjunction with Honey Brooke West (LUA 05-055), Honeybrook Circle (LUA 06-143), and Blueberry Place Townhomes Dear Mr. Hahn, On September 19, 2005, despite appeals against it by the developers of Honey Brooke West. Langley Development Group, and the residents of Blueberry Place, the desire by Development Services to extend NE 6"' St from Duvall Ave NE to Hoquiam Ave NE, as part of the Honey Brooke West development, was approved by the hearing examiner for the City of Renton. Both the development and the street extension are currently under construction, Honey Brooke West is located at the top of NE 6th St along Hoquiam Ave NE. The Blueberry Place townhomes are located near the bottom of NE 6t' St off Duvall Ave NE. For a short time longer, until the extension is completed, NE 6th St is the entrance drive to our gated community. It is important to note that the street was designed with a private dead end entrance in mind, not as a through street. So it is interesting that with NE 6th St being Blueberry Place's ONY egress and ingress neither the ci lanners or the hearing examiner thou tit important to consider what the impact would be to the community if NE 6" St were extended_. These concerns were presented in detail to the hearing examiner by Blueberry Place residents, and also later in front of the city council when we appealed his decision. But despite appeals, letters, and photos, Blueberry Place's valid concerns were ignored. In fact, Kayren Kittrick of the Development Services Division declared in front of the hearing examiner that because NE 6t" Street is only twenty feet wide it "will serve as it's own traffic calming effect, there will be people that will find it, but it is not going to be easily found or known as a main roadway." Ms Kittrick made this statement despite having to be aware that 65 homes would be built at the top of NE 6th St, not to mention the many older homes nearby, as well as other new construction going in, all with close proximity to NE 6th St, who with the extension, will have immediate, easy back and forth access past our entrance, between Duvall and Hoquiam. Page 2 The main concerns Blueberry Place presented to the hearing examiner and the City Council were these: 1. Blueberry Place is a private, gated community with NE 6th St the only outlet. There is no alternative in or out of our complex other than the fire access road next to the QFC shopping center. 2. With NE 6th St extended between Duvall Ave NE and Hoquiam Ave NE, Blueberry Place will have traffic passing in front of our entrance from two directions, only to increase as the area continues to grow. As it stands now, there will be nothing requiring vehicles to slow down as they approach Blueberry Place's entrance to allow safe passage to and from our complex. 3. NE 6tn St is only 20 feet wide. Even as a private entrance it is necessary for traffic coming in and out of Blueberry Place to be careful when vehicles are passing. There is a big concern when it becomes a through street what traffic will do without any speed constraints as vehicles attempt to enter and depart from Blueberry Place, and with passing in general. 4. There is a stanchion for opening our gate at NE 6t St. Because of this backups are likely due to vehicles waiting for the gate to open. 5. For those BP townhomes that will border the extended street, there is concern regarding the possibility of accidents into backyards, particularly since the extension as it approaches these homes from Hoquiam will be downhill. Photographs of the area were provided to the examiner, but to our knowledge no one from the City of Renton made on -site assessments before coming to the decision to extend NE 6th St. If by chance assessments were done, the decision was made to overlook the safety issues presented bZ Blueberry Place residents, since the City of Renton determined to extend NE 6 Street without including any traffic safety measures for Blueberry Place residents. Now, it has come to our attention that another development, Honey Brook Circle, will be going in at the top of NE 6th St across from Honey Brooke West. It was a jolt to discover that plat maps for these developments show both will have two internal streets opening directly onto it, a fact never disclosed by Development Services. In fact, whereas Honey Brooke West will have an additional entrance on Hoquiam Ave NE, Honeybrook Circle's entrances will be solely on NE 61" St. It is not going to be easily found or known as a main roadway? It is obvious that, quite the contrary, NE 6t11 St will be the main access road for the two developments traveling to and from Hoquiam and Duvall. It is also obvious that it will be easy access to Duvall for everyone else living along Hoquiam. And it is particularly obvious to Blueberry Place residents, with no other outlet, what the Page 3 ramifications will be contending with vehicle traffic coming and going past our entrance from at the very least 65 homes, and no doubt many, many more. It is essential that safety measures be taken to protect Blueberry Place residents. For the City to do otherwise would be extremely negligent. It is important to point out that among the photos given to the hearing examiner were those showing that our entrance gate is set back from the line oftownhomes bordering NE e Street. With the street extended it will be impossible for anyone departing through the gate to see traffic approaching from either direction. Of course, as a dead end it is not an issue, since the street (for a short time longer) curves and ends at our gate. Yet, despite photos showing what the impact would be, the hearing examiner demonstrated no concern, and offered no traffic safeguards for Blueberry Place when making his decision. Blueberry Place must have stop signs on either side of our only entrance and exit in order to allow our safe egress and ingress. There also needs to be speed bumps where the street turns into a downhill as it approaches our entrance from Hoquiam Ave NE. It would be unconscionable not to provide safety measures for our community knowing our situation, especially because of our blind entrance to the street. It is my understanding that a study is automatically initiated upon the receipt of this letter. I hope you will begin one immediately, and will complete it as soon as possible. According to Mr. Gary Stump of Langley Development Group, the extension is expected to be completed in early to mid -April, with housing construction beginning soon after. I have enclosed photos to assist you. Understanding that our concerns are urgent, I hope to hear from you very soon. Sincerely, c Ka Hayn President, Blueberry Place HOA 551 Elma Place NE Renton, WA 98459 425 277-7521 Enclosures cc: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Terri Briere, City Council President Jill Ding, Senior Planner -Development Services C. Thomas Foster, Langley Development Group Blueberry Place Board of Directors March 19, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 98 AUDIENCE COMMENT Adrienne Anderson Smith, 11621 SE 90th St., Newcastle, 98056, expressed Citizen Comment: Smith - concern for the safety of pedestrians when using the crosswalk near Hazen High Pedestrian Safety, Duvall Ave School on Duvall Ave. NE, where NE 12th St. and SE 112th St. meet. Pointing NE/NE 12th St Crosswalk out that the crosswalk needs to be better marked, she suggested the installation of walk lights similar to the ones used at the Renton Transit Center. Mayor Keolker asked Planning/Building,`Public Works Administrator Zimmerman to review the situation. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilmembcrs, items Ta. and 7.j. were removed for separate consideration. CAG: 06-047, Carco Theatre Community Services Department submitted CAG-06-047, Carco Theatre Roof Roof Replacement, Wright Replacement; and requested approval of the project, commencement of 60-day Roofing lien period, and release of retained amount of $4,661.45 to Wright Roofing, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. EDNSI': 2007 Neighborhood Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Program Grants, Budget reported submission of grant applications for the 2007 Neighborhood Grant Amend Program and recommended the following: funding eight projects and two newsletters totaling $75,231, conducting a second round of funding with a deadline of September 2007, and authorizing an additional $33,000 from the CIP (Fund 3 l6) fund balance for a total 2007 budget of $83,000, Refer to Community Services Committee, Finance: Springbrook Finance and Information Services Department recommended creating new Fund Wetlands Bank Fund Creation, 135, Springbrook Wetlands Bank, and changing Fund 131, Park Memorial, to Park Memorial Fund Change an internal fund. Refer to Finance Committee. Fire: Station #14, King County Fire Department recommended approval of a lease with King County in the Emergency Medical Services amount of $820 per month plus escalation clause, to continue to lease space at Lease Fire Station #1.4 to house a paramedic unit. Council concur. (See page 99 for resolution.) Plat: Langley Meadows, Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Langley Hoquiam Ave NE, PP-06-087 Meadows Preliminary Plat; 70 single-family lots on 1 1.16 acres located east of Hoquiam Ave. NE and north of NE 6th St. Council concur. Plat: Honeybrook Circle, NE Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Honeybrook 6th St,_PP-06-143 Circle Preliminary Plat; 14 single-family lots and one drainage tract on 2,5 acres located at 4900 NE 61h St. Council concur. CAG: 06-092, 2006 Street Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-06-092, 2006 Street Overlay Overlay with Curb Ramps, with Curb Ramps; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final Western Asphalt pay estimate in the amount of $4,181.52, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $50,677.26 to Western Asphalt, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Public Works: Cedar River Utility Systems Division requested approval of an agreement in the amount of Section 205 Flood Damage S 109,071.53 with Golder Associates, Inc. to implement the 2007 Monitoring Reduction 2007 Monitoring Plan for the Cedar River Section 205 Flood Damage Reduction project. Plan, Golder Associates Council concur. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEMS Ta. AND 7.j. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Staff Contact...... Subject: C OF PENTON COUNCIL AGEND. LL AI #: Hearing Examiner Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat File No. LUA-06-143, ECF, PP Exhibits: Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Legal Description and Vicinity Map Recommended Action: Council Concur For Agenda of. Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information....... _. Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... 3/19/07 Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required__. N/A Trans fer/Ainendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. X SUMMARY OF ACTION: The hearing was held on February 6, 2007. The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat was published on February 15, 2007. The appeal period ended on March 1, 2007. No appeals were filed. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined on pages 6 and 7 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. Conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Honcybrook Circle Preliminary Plat with conditions as outlined in the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. Rentonnct/ab hill! bh February 15, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT: CONTACT: OWNER: LOCATION. - SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT Marc Rousso Seattle Redevelopment LLC PO Box 2566 Renton, WA 98056 Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33915 1" Way S., Ste, 200 Federal Way, WA 98003 Leslie Kentworthy Estate of Sylvia Lefler 14110 SE 124'' Street Renton, WA 98059 Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA 06-143, ECF, PP 4900 NE 61h Street (Parcel No_ 102305-9208) Approval for a 14-lot subdivision and 1 drainage tract of a 2.5-acre site intended for the development of single-family detached homes_ Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 30, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING. After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the February 6, 2007 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, February 6, 2007, at approximately 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Honeybrook Circle Prelimina,, lat File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 2 The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: YeIlow file containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Plat Plan Exhibit No. 4: Conceptual Road, Drainage, and Utility Plan Exhibit No. S: Grading and Tree Plan Exhibit No. 6: Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 8: ERC Mitigation Measures The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jill Dingy, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The project site is located on the north side of NE 6"' Street and west of Hoquiam Avenue NE_ Honey Brooke West development immediately to the south is currently under construction. The site is zoned Residential-8 (R-8) and is within the Residential Single -Family Comprehensive Plan designation. The site area is approximately 2.5 acres, the proposal is to subdivide the site into 14 lots and 1 drainage tract. An existing stable and shed structure on the property would be removed. Access to the site would be via roads that are currently under construction. NE 6"' is under construction as a result of the Honey Brooke subdivision. The applicant would finish the construction to NE 6a' street on their property. Field Place NE and Graham Avenue NE are extensions of roads that are under construction for Honey Brooke West. NE Vb Street is a new road located on the north end of the project site. The applicant requested a modification for reduced rights -of -way, requesting that Field Place NE and NE 6'}' Street be reduced to 42-feet wide and that NE 7`h Street be reduced to 26-feet wide and Graham Avenue NE be reduced to 27-feet wide. That modification was granted on January 8, 2007, there were two conditions associated with the modification. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance -- Mitigated with 6 mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. Fire, Traffic and Parks Mitigation Fees were imposed on this project. The project is consistent with the residential single-family land use elements and community design elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The project has a net density of 7.8 dwelling units per acre, which complies with the requirements for the R-8 zoning designation. All lots appear to meet the size, dimension and setbacks required for the R-8 zone. Building height is limited to two stories and 30 feet for primary structures. The height and lot coverage of the new residences would be verified at the time of application for building permits. Each unit would be required to provide two off-street parking stalls. Landscaping would be required along all public street frontages. The proposed landscape plan appears to comply with the city's landscaping requirements. A detailed landscape plan would be required at the time of building permit application. All lots comply with the subdivision regulations. A new internal looped road system would provide access to the new lots. Street improvements would be required along the new roads including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks adjacent to the curb and street lighting. Honeybrook Circle Preliminar j flat File No_: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 3 The site is currently forested, the submitted tree plan identifies 166 significant trees therefore 42 trees are required to be retained or replaced. The tree retention plan identifies 28 trees to be retained, therefore an additional 14 2-inch caliper trees are required to be planted on the project site. A tree retention plan would be submitted with the Utility Construction Permit application. The site is located within the Renton School District. The proposed plat would potentially result in 6 additional students. The School District has indicated that it could accommodate the new students. The proposed drainage control would be by a detention vault located within proposed Tract A at the southwest corner of the project site. The project would be required to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. A homeowner's association should be established to ensure responsibility for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat. Staff added an additional condition: "Tract A should be landscaped and/or fenced appropriately prior to final plat approval." The site is located within the area of Water District 90. All improvements would need to be in accordance with Water District 90 and City of Renton standards. The property is served by the City of Renton sewer service. An existing 12-inch sewer main is in Hoquiam Avenue NE at the intersection of Hoquiam Avenue NE and NE 5" Street. There is also an 8-inch sewer main under construction in the Honey Brooke West sibdivision located to the south of the project. An 8-inch sewer main would be required to be extended onto the site from the under construction sewer main. I -fearing Examiner questioned the reference to alley access for new plats but there is no alley access. What are the preferences regarding alleys, is it strong, or should it be eliminated as a concept. It appears to not be used in areas where there may be room for an alley. Not putting an alley in does save some open space and green space for the retention of trees. Ms. Dingy stated that alley access was looked at and is done regularly on a case -by -case basis. In this instance an alley would move the lots out and the roads would not align, or there would be less lots. There are many things that are being looked at that are good things for the City. James_Jaeger, Jaeger Engineering, 9419 S 204tn Place, Kent, WA 98031 stated that this is a fairly simple plat, there are no issues or complaints with recommendations. The property to the north was going to be developed along with this site as a common plat, however, the owner decided to wait a little longer before developing. The roads were going to continue with a similar plat to the north and the same traffic patterns. It would be difficult to extend Field Ave on the west property line due to some apartments with garages that are encroaching on the property line. The NE 7a` request for reduction was so that when the property to the north is developed, that property extends further to the east and it is likely that a half right-of-way would be constructed to complete NE 7th along this plat but also continue it to the east even further. If a full street were to be developed, it would not be able to continue to the east. Norm Lane, 5000 NE 60 Street, Renton, WA 98059 stated that his property is exactly the east border from north to south of this plat. He has no real issue with this construction but is concerned his fence along their east border that is currently a five-foot chain link. He has been told that only a four -foot fence would be placed on that border. Honeybrook Circle Preliminai, lat File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 4 Ms. Ding recommended that Mr. Lane should ask for a six-foot before the right-of-way is actually dedicated. Currently it is not a dedicated right-of-way, when it does become dedicated, he would be limited to a four -foot fence. If the fence is built before the dedication, a six-foot fence could be built there. The sections abutting NE 0 and NE 7" would have to be lower so as to not be sight obscuring. Mr. Lane also is concerned with the trees and when the property south of him was developed, many trees were removed and when the windstorm came, two trees went through his house. Now, with this project, any existing tree should be taken down for safety and replaced with smaller trees. His yard is totally fenced in, it feels safer for he and his family. When some of those trees are being removed, the fence will have to be taken out due to the location of the roots. He wants the fence replaced immediately. The Examiner stated that that would be a private arrangement, the construction people cannot take out his chain link fence or affect the fence without an agreement. They cannot trespass on his property without permission even as working along the boundary to private property. Mr. Lane had further concerns regarding dust and making sure that the dust is kept under control. Kay Haynes, Blueberry Place Homeowner's Association, 551 Elma Place NE, Renton, WA 99059 stated that they are located southwest of the new development. They have been severely impacted by this new construction_ There is only one egress and ingress to their development, that being NE 6 h, there is no other way to come or go. Concerns have been previously voiced regarding the extension of NE 6a`. The impact of more traffic was played down by the City, one person stated that most people would not even know the street was there. Now that there are more developments with roads opening onto NE 6"', this will become the main route for travel to Duvall. There have been no stop signs or anything done to protect their safety when coming or leaving their property. They have been totally overlooked and some procedures need to be taken to ensure safety for the residents of Blueberry Place. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that the modifications to NE 7a` (it was pointed out that there already is a NE 7a` Street to the north) were to keep the options open for the larger developments that will be in the future. To retain emergency access, fire department access, police, garbage, etc, NE Vh needed to be developed. NE 6`h was dedicated at the same time as Honey Brooke West and it will be going through. They are aware that there is a single gated access that is very limited at that location_ They are waiting for the road to be complete before making an evaluation. Transportation has it on their list to do a study once they see what traffic actually does, then they will decide. They are not, at this point, in favor of stop signs. The Blueberry Association should apply to the Deputy Director for Public Works and ask for a complete study. Dust and erosion control plans are approved through the City, she will note Mr. Lane's concerns and make sure he gets in touch with the project manager so that they can be on top of the dust control issue. Regarding alley access to plats they have been in discussions with transportation about how to do this. It does not work for this project and Development Services is going back to Council to ask for clarification. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:08 am. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &, RECOMMENDATION Honeybrook Circle Prelimim_ Oat File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 5 Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 _ The applicant, Marc Rousso, filed a request for a Preliminary Plat. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located on the north side of the 4900 block of NE 6th Street. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre). The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5203 enacted in May 2006. The subject site is approximately 108,972 square feet or 2.5 acres. The subject site is approximately 331 feet wide (east to west) by 329 feet deep. 10. The site slopes gently down to the south and west losing approximately 20 feet. The applicant estimated 1,500 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of fill for grading for roads and building pads. 11. No critical areas were identified on the subject site. 12. A tree survey identified 166 significant trees on the project site. Staff has determined that retention or replacement at a rate of 25% requires retaining or replacing 42 trees. 13. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 14 lots and 1 drainage tract. The lots would range in size from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. The applicant proposes an interior public loop road system that encircles a block of ten (10) lots, in a two lot by five -lot arrangement, along with a single tier of lots along the western edge of the plat. 14. The primary access to the site would be from NE 6th Street along the south edge of the plat. It would connect on the west with Duvall Avenue NE. Looping north from 6th would be Field Avenue, connecting to NE 7th Street (this proposed name would have to be changed) and then connecting and completing the loop to Graham Avenue NE. All of the lots would take access to these public streets. A review of potential alley access to the interior block was not found practical, as it would have reduced the density of the plat. NE 6th would be extended to the east to Hoquiam. Staff noted that some of the roadways would be less than standard width due to preexisting lot and property lines. 15. The density for the plat would be 7.8 dwelling units per acre after subtracting roadways from the total acreage. There is no deduction for sensitive areas in this plat. Honeybrook Circle Prelimina., ]at File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 6 16. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 6 additional school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. 17. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 140 trips for the 14 single-family homes. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 14 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 18. Stormwater will be detained on Tract A in the southwest corner of the subject site, The ERC imposed the requirements of the King County Stormwater Manual of 2005 on the subject site. 19. Sewer service will be provided by the City. Lines will need to be extended to serve the subject site. 20_ The subject site is served by Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a certificate of water availability from Water District 90. 21. Homeowners from Blueberry Place are concerned that additional traffic will make ingress and egress from their site more difficult. 22. The development of the subject site would not diminish the private property rights of neighboring property owners. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The fourteen new lots will provide additional housing opportunities for those seeking detached single-family homes. The lots are in an area where urban services are available. The development will generate some impacts on the neighborhood and community. Those impacts were anticipated when the Comprehensive Plan was adopted and when zoning was overlaid on the property. The applicant will be paying mitigation fees to offset the development's impacts on roads, parks and fire services. The development will increase the tax base of the City and those taxes should help offset some of the other impacts. The staff noted that they would have to review the traffic patterns along NE 6th Street to ascertain impacts on Blueberry Place_ There will be impacts but additional housing always creates some level of additional traffic on existing public streets. 4_ In conclusion, the proposed plat appears to reasonably divide the two and a half acre site and should be approved by the City Council, RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the proposed plat subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 2007. Honeybrook Circle Prelimina.y -']at File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 7 A demolition permit shall be obtained and all required inspections shall be completed for the removal of the existing shed and stable prior to the recording of the final plat. A Tree Retention/Replacement Plan shall be submitted with the Utility Construction Permit Application to the Development Services Division project manager. The plan shall identify trees to be retained and measures to be taken during construction to ensure the trees are adequately protected. The plan shall also identify replacement trees and shall include the planting location, species type, and planting specifications. 4. A homeowner's association shall be established for the development, to ensure that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A draft of the agreement, HOA and/or CC&R documents shall be submitted at the time of application for utilities construction permits, so that it may be reviewed by the City attorney and the Development Services project manager. Tract A should be landscaped and/or fenced appropriately prior to final plat approval. ORDERED THIS 15`h day of February 2007. FRED J. K.AUfp AN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 151n day of February 2007 to the parties of record: Jill Ding Development Services 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 339I5 151 Way S., Ste. 200 Federal Way, WA 98003 Marc Rousso Seattle Redevelopment, LLC PO Box 2566 Renton, WA 98056 James Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 S 204`" Place Kent, WA 98031 Leslie Kentworthy Estate of Sylvia Lefler 14110 SE 124`h Street Renton, WA 98059 Kay Haynes Blueberry Place Homeowners Assoc. 551 Elma Place NE Renton, WA 98059 Norm Lane Kenneth Johnson C. Thomas Foster 5000 NE 6`h Street 4915 NE 7'' Street Langley Development Group, Inc. Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 6450 Southeenter Blvd., Ste. 106 Seattle, WA 98188 Honeybrook Circle Prelimina. _ lat File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 15'b day of February 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Larry Rude, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100(G) of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., March 1, 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 .m. March i 2007. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, time executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processinIZ of the rile. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. D6 3 TZ3N RUE E 117, T eft SE 1) 2th F) LSE 113th sl R--.8 R NE IOLh St. R-8 NE 10th S. R 8� R-4 771 117Lh R--' AR gth St NE9th :::St r4 R-_ 8 4,4 st j4 RM-F --4 SE 1'9 E6 iq T23N R5E ! I A PORTION OF THE N.E. 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 N.. RANGE 5 E., W.M. JOMMM KUPCM f LAW WrU ... ..... ... 2 'VELOPMC,7 mome VICINITY MAP V�- n SCALE; 1-- 20' TREE L AND QUAMMIESARE CITY OF RENTOI DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-143, PP, ECF APPLICANT: Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Marc Rousso PROJECT NAME Honeybrook Circle Prelimany Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108.972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 49XX NE 61h Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of PlanninglBuilding/Public Works Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Solutions NE, LLC, dated January 11, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume 11 of the most current Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 fling County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control — a_k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot. 5. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the recording of the final plat. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $10,048.50 (133.98 net new daily trips x $75 = $10,048.50). 6. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. The fee is estimated at $6,832 ($488 x 14 = $6,832). ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 ' '�JICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1179476 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE S EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 30 FEET AND THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; EXCEPT ANY PORTION OF SAID EASEMENT LYING WITHIN COUNTY ROAD_ 1 G1 t' ox- ;= 14 i"Cad! BECEIVED nA•nUzrr./r:Dn/o-499 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of King } ss. Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 151h day of February 2007, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this t5 iday of i. , 2007. f Application, Petition or Case No. at State of Washington , therein. Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat LUA 06-143, ECF, PP The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. � l HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT February 15, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT: CONTACT: OWNER: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: PUBLIC HEARING: Marc Rousso Seattle Redevelopment LLC PO Box 2566 Renton, WA 98056 Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33915 1" Way S., Ste. 200 Federal Way, WA 98003 Leslie Kentworthy Estate of Sylvia Lefler 14110 SE 1240' Street Renton, WA 98059 Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA 06-143, ECF, PP 4900 NE 6`h Street (Parcel No. 102305-9208) Approval for a 14-lot subdivision and 1 drainage tract of a 2.5-acre site intended for the development of single-family detached homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 30, 2007. After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the February 6, 2007 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, February 6, 2007, at approximately 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Honeybrook Circle Preliminai; _ at File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 2 The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Plat Plan Exhibit No. 4: Utility Plan Conceptual Road, Drainage, and Exhibit No. 5: Grading and Tree Plan Exhibit No. 6: Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 8: ERC Mitigation Measures The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jill Dingy, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The project site is located on the north side of NE 6th Street and west of Hoquiarn Avenue NE. Honey Brooke West development immediately to the south is currently under construction. The site is zoned Residential-8 (R-8) and is within the Residential Single -Family Comprehensive Plan designation. The site area is approximately 2.5 acres, the proposal is to subdivide the site into 14 lots and 1 drainage tract. An existing stable and shed structure on the property would be removed. Access to the site would be via roads that are currently under construction. NE 6h' is under construction as a result of the Honey Brooke subdivision. The applicant would finish the construction to NE 6`h street on their property. Field Place NE and Graham Avenue NE are extensions of roads that are under construction for Honey Brooke West. NE 7`h Street is a new road located on the north end of the project site. The applicant requested a modification for reduced rights -of -way, requesting that Field Place NE and NE 6ffi Street be reduced to 42-feet wide and that NE 7t' Street be reduced to 26-feet wide and Graham Avenue NE be reduced to 27-feet wide. That modification was granted on January 8, 2007, there were two conditions associated with the modification. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated with 6 mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. Fire, Traffic and Parks Mitigation Fees were imposed on this project. The project is consistent with the residential single-family land use elements and community design elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The project has a net density of 7.8 dwelling units per acre, which complies with the requirements for the R-8 zoning designation. All lots appear to meet the size, dimension and setbacks required for the R-8 zone. Building height is limited to two stories and 30 feet for primary structures. The height and lot coverage of the new residences would be verified at the time of application for building permits. Each unit would be required to provide two off-street parking stalls. Landscaping would be required along all public street frontages. The proposed landscape plan appears to comply with the city's landscaping requirements. A detailed landscape plan would be required at the time of building permit application. All lots comply with the subdivision regulations. A new internal looped road system would provide access to the new lots. Street improvements would be required along the new roads including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks adjacent to the curb and street lighting. Honeybrook Circle Preliminary riat File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 3 The site is currently forested, the submitted tree plan identifies 166 significant trees therefore 42 trees are required to be retained or replaced. The tree retention plan identifies 28 trees to be retained, therefore an additional 14 2-inch caliper trees are required to be planted on the project site. A tree retention plan would be submitted with the Utility Construction Permit application. The site is located within the Renton School District. The proposed plat would potentially result in 6 additional students. The School District has indicated that it could accommodate the new students. The proposed drainage control would be by a detention vault located within proposed Tract A at the southwest corner of the project site. The project would be required to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual. A homeowner's association should be established to ensure responsibility for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat. Staff added an additional condition: "Tract A should be landscaped and/or fenced appropriately prior to final plat approval." The site is located within the area of Water District 90. All improvements would need to be in accordance with Water District 90 and City of Renton standards. The property is served by the City of Renton sewer service. An existing 12-inch sewer main is in Hoquiam Avenue NE at the intersection of Hoquiam Avenue NE and NE 5"' Street. There is also an 8-inch sewer main under construction in the Honey Brooke West sibdivision located to the south of the project. An 8-inch sewer main would be required to be extended onto the site from the under construction sewer main. Hearing Examiner questioned the reference to alley access for new plats but there is no alley access. What are the preferences regarding alleys, is it strong, or should it be eliminated as a concept. It appears to not be used in areas where there may be room for an alley. Not putting an alley in does save some open space and green space for the retention of trees. Ms. Dingy stated that alley access was looked at and is done regularly on a case -by -case basis. In this instance an alley would move the lots out and the roads would not align, or there would be less lots. There are many things that are being looked at that are good things for the City. James Jaeger, Jaeger Engineering, 9419 S 204"' Place, Kent, WA 98031 stated that this is a fairly simple plat, there are no issues or complaints with recommendations. The property to the north was going to be developed along with this site as a common plat, however, the owner decided to wait a little longer before developing. The roads were going to continue with a similar plat to the north and the same traffic patterns. It would be difficult to extend Field Ave on the west property line due to some apartments with garages that are encroaching on the property line. The NE 7 h request for reduction was so that when the property to the north is developed, that property extends further to the east and it is likely that a half right-of-way would be constructed to complete NE 7`h along this plat but also continue it to the east even further. If a full street were to be developed, it would not be able to continue to the east. Norm Lane, 5000 NE 6a` Street, Renton, WA 98059 stated that his property is exactly the east border from north to south of this plat. He has no real issue with this construction but is concerned his fence along their east border that is currently a five-foot chain link. He has been told that only a four -foot fence would be placed on that border. Honeybrook Circle Preliminary -,at File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 4 Ms. Dingy recommended that Mr. Lane should ask for a six-foot before the right-of-way is actually dedicated. Currently it is not a dedicated right-of-way, when it does become dedicated, he would be limited to a four -foot fence. If the fence is built before the dedication, a six-foot fence could be built there. The sections abutting NE 6" and NE 7`h would have to be lower so as to not be sight obscuring. Mr. Lane also is concerned with the trees and when the property south of him was developed, many trees were removed and when the windstorm came, two trees went through his house. Now, with this project, any existing tree should be taken down for safety and replaced with smaller trees. His yard is totally fenced in, it feels safer for he and his family. When some of those trees are being removed, the fence will have to be taken out due to the location of the roots. He wants the fence replaced immediately. The Examiner stated that that would be a private arrangement, the construction people cannot take out his chain link fence or affect the fence without an agreement. They cannot trespass on his property without permission even as working along the boundary to private property. Mr. Lane had further concerns regarding dust and making sure that the dust is kept under control. Kay Haynes, Blueberry Place Homeowner's Association, 551 Elma Place NE, Renton, WA 98059 stated that they are located southwest of the new development. They have been severely impacted by this new construction. There is only one egress and ingress to their development, that being NE 6t`, there is no other way to come or go. Concerns have been previously voiced regarding the extension of NE 6`h. The impact of more traffic was played down by the City, one person stated that most people would not even know the street was there. Now that there are more developments with roads opening onto NE Oh, this will become the main route for travel to Duvall. There have been no stop signs or anything done to protect their safety when coming or leaving their property. They have been totally overlooked and some procedures need to be taken to ensure safety for the residents of Blueberry Place. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that the modifications to NE Vh (it was pointed out that there already is a NE 7`" Street to the north) were to keep the options open for the larger developments that will be in the future. To retain emergency access, fire department access, police, garbage, etc, NE 7ffi needed to be developed. NE 6"' was dedicated at the same time as Honey Brooke West and it will be going through. They are aware that there is a single gated access that is very limited at that location. They are waiting for the road to be complete before making an evaluation. Transportation has it on their list to do a study once they see what traffic actually does, then they will decide. They are not, at this point, in favor of stop signs. The Blueberry Association should apply to the Deputy Director for Public Works and ask for a complete study. Dust and erosion control plans are approved through the City, she will note Mr. Lane's concerns and make sure he gets in touch with the project manager so that they can be on top of the dust control issue. Regarding alley access to plats they have been in discussions with transportation about how to do this. It does not work for this project and Development Services is going back to Council to ask for clarification. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10.08 am. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Honeybrook Circle Prelimina .. tat File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 5 Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: The applicant, Marc Rousso, filed a request for a Preliminary Plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located on the north side of the 4900 block of NE 6th Street. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre). The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5203 enacted in May 2006. 9. The subject site is approximately 108,972 square feet or 2.5 acres. The subject site is approximately 331 feet wide (east to west) by 329 feet deep. 10. The site slopes gently down to the south and west losing approximately 20 feet. The applicant estimated 1,500 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of fill for grading for roads and building pads. l t . No critical areas were identified on the subject site. 12. A tree survey identified 166 significant trees on the project site. Staff has determined that retention or replacement at a rate of 25% requires retaining or replacing 42 trees. 13. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 14 lots and 1 drainage tract. The lots would range in size from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. The applicant proposes an interior public loop road system that encircles a block of ten (10) lots, in a two lot by five -lot arrangement, along with a single tier of lots along the western edge of the plat. 14. The primary access to the site would be from NE 6th Street along the south edge of the plat. It would connect on the west with Duvall Avenue NE. Looping north from 6th would be Field Avenue, connecting to NE 7th Street (this proposed name would have to be changed) and then connecting and completing the loop to Graham Avenue NE. All of the lots would take access to these public streets. A review of potential alley access to the interior block was not found practical, as it would have reduced the density of the plat. NE 6th would be extended to the east to Hoquiam. Staff noted that some of the roadways would be less than standard width due to preexisting lot and property lines. 15. The density for the plat would be 7.8 dwelling units per acre after subtracting roadways from the total acreage. There is no deduction for sensitive areas in this plat. Honeybrook Circle Preliminar, at File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 6 16. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 6 additional school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. 17. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 140 trips for the 14 single-family homes. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 14 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 18. Stormwater will be detained on Tract A in the southwest corner of the subject site. The ERC imposed the requirements of the King County Stormwater Manual of 2005 on the subject site. 19. Sewer service will be provided by the City. Lines will need to be extended to serve the subject site. 20. The subject site is served by Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a certificate of water availability from Water District 90. 21. Homeowners from Blueberry Place are concerned that additional traffic will make ingress and egress from their site more difficult. 22. The development of the subject site would not diminish the private property rights of neighboring property owners. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The fourteen new lots will provide additional housing opportunities for those seeking detached single-family homes. The lots are in an area where urban services are available. 2. The development will generate some impacts on the neighborhood and community. Those impacts were anticipated when the Comprehensive Plan was adopted and when zoning was overlaid on the property. The applicant will be paying mitigation fees to offset the development's impacts on roads, parks and fire services. The development will increase the tax base of the City and those taxes should help offset some of the other impacts. The staff noted that they would have to review the traffic patterns along NE 6th Street to ascertain impacts on Blueberry Place. There will be impacts but additional housing always creates some level of additional traffic on existing public streets. 4. In conclusion, the proposed plat appears to reasonably divide the two and a half acre site and should be approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the proposed plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 2007. Honeybrook Circle Preliminary -tat File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 7 A demolition permit shall be obtained and all required inspections shall be completed for the removal of the existing shed and stable prior to the recording of the final plat. A Tree Retention/Replacement Plan shall be submitted with the Utility Construction Permit Application to the Development Services Division project manager. The plan shall identify trees to be retained and measures to be taken during construction to ensure the trees are adequately protected. The plan shall also identify replacement trees and shall include the planting location, species type, and planting specifications. 4. A homeowner's association shall be established for the development, to ensure that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A draft of the agreement, HOA and/or CC&R documents shall be submitted at the time of application for utilities construction permits, so that it may be reviewed by the City attorney and the Development Services project manager. 5. Tract A should be landscaped and/or fenced appropriately prior to final plat approval. ORDERED THIS 15`' day of February 2007. FRED J. KA AN HEARING E INER TRANSMITTED THIS 15`h day of February 2007 to the parties of record: Jill Ding Development Services 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33915 0 Way S., Ste. 200 Federal Way, WA 98003 Marc Rousso Seattle Redevelopment, LLC PO Box 2566 Renton, WA 98056 James Jaeger Jaeger Engineering 9419 S 204th Place Kent, WA 98031 Leslie Kentworthy Estate of Sylvia Lefler 14110 SE 124"' Street Renton, WA 98059 Kay Haynes Blueberry Place Homeowners Assoc. 551 Elma Place NE Renton, WA 98059 Norm Lane Kenneth Johnson C. Thomas Foster 5000 NE 61h Street 4915 NE 7"` Street Langley Development Group, Inc. Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 6450 Southccnter Blvd., Ste, 106 Seattle, WA 98188 Honeybrook Circle Prelimina , _ at File No.: LUA-06-143, ECF, PP February 15, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 15'h day of February 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Larry Rude, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100(G) of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., March 1, 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., March 1, 2007. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will he required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Project Location: 49XX NE 6'h Street (Parcel No. 102305-9208) D6 - 3 T23N R5E E 1/2 28 RM-F LR� to 7R - CA F6 15 T23N Rn E 1/2 ZONING Ff&.rw 02A&W 19 T23N SE 1, w E6 E I/Z 14 12 A PORTION OF THE N.E- 1/4, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. JUM46OX Kfl*C'N f 6 4 7 ATM� w ft ­j raw nor.i m w vrLAPrgNr WE VIClNrrY MAP .,A n SCALE: V�- 20' P"por-L M JNOTE; MANOGUAMMMSARE ALLSEADJUMOPER LmLrrYt,gm �TMWS. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-143, PP, ECF APPLICANT: Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Marc Rousso PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Prelimany Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 49XX NE 6th Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Solutions NE, LLC, dated January 11, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most current Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The -detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control — a_k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot. I 5. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the recording of the final plat. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $10,048.50 (133.98 net new daily trips x $75 = $10,048.50). 6. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. The fee is estimated at $6,832 ($488 x 14 = $6,832). ERC Mifigabon Measures Page 1 of 1 �L Y CIT-1 _)F RENTON "R" Kathy Keolker, Mayor February 6, 2007 Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting 33915 1"Way S #200 Federal Way 98003 Subject: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. LaBrie: Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Below are comments I have received from our Property Services Section. These comments will aid you in the preparation of your final plat drawing. Please address the following comments for your final plat submittal: The word "COUNTY" is misspelled in the "LEGAL DESCRIPTION" block. Information needed for final plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-OX-XXX- FP and LND-10-0454, respectively, on the drawing sheets. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Please note that the land use action number for the final plat will be different from the preliminary plat number and is unknown as of this date. Note two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties are provided_ A licensed surveyor will need to prepare, stamp, sign and date the final plat drawing Pursuant to the recently revised WAC 196-23-020, the surveyor's expiration date now needs to be applied manually. Any final document must contain the seal/stamp, handwritten license expiration date by the licensee [I signature and date of signature of the licensee who prepared or directly supervised the work. For the purpose of this section "document" is defined as plans, specifications, plats, surveys [] as -built documents prepared by the licensee [j and reports. Provide plat and lot closure calculations. Note the date the existing monuments were visited, per WAC 332-130-150, and what was found. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 0ah-1 .. _._ __ ---I- __ Ins. ___' RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE Complete City of Renton Monument Cards, with reference points of all new right-of-way monuments set as part of the plat. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAG 332-130-100. Required City of Renton signatures (on the final plat submittal) include the Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Mayor and the City Clerk. An approval block for the city's Finance Director is also required. Appropriate (Sing County approval blocks need to be noted on the plat drawing. All vested owners of the plat property need to sign the final plat document. Include notary blocks as needed. Include a dedication/certification block on the plat drawing. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. On the final submittal, remove all references to utility facilities, topog lines and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. Remove all references to building setback lines. Setbacks will be determined at the time of issuance of building permits. Remove all references to density and zoning on the final submittal. Note encroachments, if any. Note all easements, agreements and covenants of record on the drawing. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots after the preliminary plat is approved. The addresses (and street names) will need to be noted on the plat document. Note whether the adjoining properties are platted (give plat name and lot number) or unplatted. Remove all references to density and zoning information from the final plat drawing. If there is a Restrictive Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions document for this plat, then reference the same on the plat drawing and provide a space for the recording number thereof. Note that if there are restrictive covenants, easements or agreements to others (neighboring property owners, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the plat. The plat drawings and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The plat document will be recorded first (with King County). The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) (said documents recorded concurrently with, but following the plat) need to be referenced on the plat drawings. If there is a Homeowners' Association (HOA) for this plat, the following language concerning ownership of "TRACT A" (drainage) applies to this plat and should be noted on the final plat drawing as follows: Upon the recording of this plat, Tract A is hereby granted and conveyed to the Plat of Honeybrook Circle Homeowners' Association (HOA) for drainage purposes. All necessary maintenance activities for said Tract will be the responsibility of the HOA. In the event that the HOA is dissolved or otherwise fails to meet its property tax obligations, as evidenced by non-payment of property taxes for a period of eighteen (18) months, then each lot in this plat shall assume and have an equal and undivided ownership interest in the Tract previously owned by the HOA and have the attendant financial and maintenance responsibilities. If there is no Homeowners' Association, use the following text on the final plat drawing: Lots 1 through 14 shall have an equal and undivided ownership interest in "Tract A". The forgoing statement is to be accompanied by language defining the maintenance responsibilities for any infrastructure located on the Tract serving the plat, or reference a separate recorded instrument detailing the same. NOTE: The City of Renton does not assume ownership of drainage detention tracts created via the establishment of plats. I have also attached a copy of the fee review sheet for your information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jill K. Ding Senior Planner cc: Estate of Sylvia Lefler/Gerald Lefler / Owner Marc Rousso / Applicant Parties of record Enclosure Y C'I' . r 3F RENTON '_""R ,��> � , Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 30, 2007; Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33915 1st Way S #200 Federal Way, WA 98003 SUBJECT: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat LUA06-143, PP, ECF Dear Mr. LaBrie Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended January 26, 2007 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated for the above - referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. Comments were received and copies are enclosed. These comments will have no additional bearing on the decision. This decision is final and the applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in the Report and Decision dated January 8, 2007. A Hearing Examiner Public Hearing has been scheduled for February 6, 2007, where Site Plan Conditions may be issued. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present. Enclosed is a copy of the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for your review. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Jill K. Ding if Senior Planner CC" Leslie Kentworthy / Owner Kay Haynes, Norm Lane, Kenneth Johnson, C. Thomas Foster I Parties of Record Marc Rousso / Applicant Enclosures 1055 Soutb C -i T ay entan, Washington 9Rp57. N T N ;o`au A'HEAU pF THE ('L7h'.:F. ...? .... - ,'.'S?Thisaaoerwntahs50%recvc6dmate-.i:3o%oostoonsumer. CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 30" day of January, 2007, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Eric LaBrie Contact Marc Rousso Applicant Leslie Kentworthy Owner Kay Haynes POR Norm Lane POR Kenneth Johnson POR C. Thomas Foster POR (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) `' SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the, purposes mentioned in the instrument.¢° Dated: i -�Vs - ra-7 Notary Public in . Notary (Print): My appointment expires: . l q — 4 Q Project Name: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat Project Number: LUA06-143, PP, ECF ind , r the State ofVV4- 6gton- CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING February 6, 2007 FITC14 k1l I PTA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-06-143, PP, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. HEX Agenda 2-6-07.doc City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning / Building / Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: February 6, 2007 Project Name: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat Applicant: Marc Rousso Owner: Leslie Kentworthy Seattle Redevelopment, Estate of Sylvia Lefler LLC 14110 SE 1241h St PO Box 2566 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98056 Contact: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33915 11�t Way S, ste 200 Federal Way, WA 98003 File Number: LUA-06-143, PP, ECF Project Manager: Jill K_ Ding, Senior Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. Project Location: 49XX NE 6th Street (Parcel No. 102305-9208) City of Renton P/B/PW Depart Preliminary Report to the Nearing Examiner HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-06-143, PP, ECF PUBLIC NEARING DATE: February 6, 2007 Page 2 o` 9 B. HEARING EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project_ Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit 3: Preliminary Plat Plan (dated 08128/2006) Exhibit 4: Conceptual Road, Drainage, and Utility Plan (dated 08/28/2006) Exhibit 5: Grading and Tree Plan (dated 08/28/2006) Exhibit 6: Landscape Plan (dated 08/13/2006) Exhibit 7: Zoning Map sheet E 6, east''/z (dated 02/16/2006) Exhibit 8:. ERC Mitigation Measures C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Leslie Kentworthy, Estate of Sylvia Lefler 14110 SE 124`r' St, Renton, WA 98069 2. Zoning Designation: Residential — 8 (R-8) Dwelling Units per Acre 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Residential Single Family (RSF) Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Existing stable and shed to be removed 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential, R-8 zoning East: Single family residential, R-8 zoning South: Single family residential, Honey Brooke West Subdivision R-8 zoning West: Multi -family residential, RM-F zoning 6. Access: Via proposed internal public streets 7. Site Area: 108,972 square feet (2.5 acres) 8. Project Data: Area Existing Building Area: WA New Building Area: N/A Total Building Area: NIA D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Comments Existing stable and shed to be rerrovec N/A N/A Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Annexation NIA 5203 Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 Zoning N/A 5100 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Date 05/0312006 11101 /2004 1 1/01/2004 HEX Report 06-143.doe City of Renton PIBIPW Depot Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner I-HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PRELIMINAHY PLAT LUA-06-143, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2007 Page 3 of 9 Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-050: General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat and Lot Line Adjustment Procedures Section 4-7-080: Detailed Procedures for Subdivision Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots — General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 7. Chapter 11 Definitions F, APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Residential Single Family objectives and policies. 2. Community Design Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The protect site totals 2,5-acres and is proposed to be subdivided into 14 lots and 1 drainage tract. To the south is the Honey Brooke West subdivision, which is currently under construction. To the west is a multi -family residential development. The north and east sides of the property are bounded by existing single family residential development. An existing stable and shed are located on the project site and are proposed to be removed. The resulting net density would be 7.8 dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from 4,500 sq. ft. to 5,014 sq. ft. Primary access to the lots would be from a new internal looped access road (Graham Ave NE, NE 71h St, Field PI NE, and NE 61h St). Field PI NE and Graham Ave NE would be extensions of roads under construction for the Honey Brooke West subdivision. NE 51h Street along the frontage of the project site is currently under construction for the Honey Brooke West subdivision and the proposed project would be required to complete the frontage improvements on the project side of the street_ The applicant has applied for a modification to the street standards, to reduce the right-of-way width of NE 61h Street and Field Avenue NE to 42 feet wide, NE 7th Street to 26 feet wide, and.Graham Avenue NE to 27 feet wide with improvements on the development side to include sidewalk, curb, and gutter. The modification request was granted January 8, 2007 with 2 conditions: 1. "No Parking" signs shall be installed at any location where the pavement width is less than twenty-eight feet (28'), 2. In lieu of the buffering of five feet (5') between the development and the neighbors (along the east property line), a solid wood decorative fence meeting City of Renton code requirements for height shall be constructed along the full length of the property prior to recording of the final plat. The site slopes down to the south and west with an approximate elevation change of 20 feet. The applicant proposes clearing and grading for the roads, lots, utilities and detention vault. An estimated 1,500 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of fill are proposed. HEX Report 06-143.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Depar Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PRELIMINAHYPLAT LUA-06-143, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2007 Page 4 of 9 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on January 8, 2007, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat. The DNS-M included six mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on January 12, 2007 and ended on January 26, 2007. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated: 1 . The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Solutions NE, LLC, dated January 11, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most current Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan. prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control — a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot. 5. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the recording of the final plat. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $10,048.50 (133.98 net new daily trips x $75 = $10,048.50). 6. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. The fee is estimated at $6,832 ($488 x 14 = $6,832). 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CRITERIA: Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following preliminary plat criteria have been established to assist decision makers in the review of the subdivision: A. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation. The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, Land designated Residential Single Family is intended to be used for quality detached residential development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It ks intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single family living environments. The proposed plat is consistent with the following Residential Single Family Land Use, and Community Design Elements of the Comprehensive Plan: Land Use Element Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The proposal for 14 lots on the subject site would arrive HEX Report 06-143.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Depai Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner HONE YBROOK CIRCLE PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-06-143, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2007 Page 5 of 9 at a net density of 7.8 dwelling units per net acre, which is within the density range permitted in the R-8 zone. Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in -fill parcels of less than an acre (43,560 square feet) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction in lot size to 4,500 square feet on parcels greater than an acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range. The site is greater than one acre and all lots would be greater than or equal to 4,500 square feet Policy LU=152. Single family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities. The proposed lots would all comply with the minimum lot size, width and depth requirements. In addition, it appears that the proposed lots would create adequate area for the construction of detached single family residences in compliance with the required setbacks. Community Design Element Policy CD-19: During development, significant trees, either individually or in stands, should be preserved, replaced, or as a last option, relocated. The applicant will be required to retain or replace 25 percent of all existing significant trees on the project site. Policy CD-26: Streets, sidewalks, and pedestrian or bike paths should be arranged as an interconnecting network. Dead-end streets and cul-de-sacs should be discouraged. A grid or "flexible grid"patter or streets and pathways, with a hierarchy of widths and corresponding traffic volumes, should be used. No dead-end streets are proposed. The current subdivision layout is arranged as a grid system providing a future connection to the property to the north. B. Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation. The 2.5-acre site is designated Residential - 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of up to 14 new single-family residential units. Densit - The allowed maximum density in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 dwelling units per net acre (dulac) to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per net acre. Net density is calculated after public rights -of - way, private access easements, and critical areas are deducted from the gross acreage of the site. After the deduction of 31,006 square feet of proposed right-of-way dedication, the proposal for 14 lots would result in a net density of 7.8 dwelling units per acre (108,972 gross square feet - 31,006 square feet = 77,966 square feet or 1.79 acres, 14 units l 1.79 acres = 7.8 dulac). The proposed plat would comply with density requirements for the R-8 zoning designation. Lot Dimensions and Size - The minimum lot size required in the R-8 zone for sites over one acre in size is 4,500 sq feet. The minimum lot width required is 50 ft for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots, and a minimum lot depth of 65 feet is required. Proposed lot widths range from 50 to 60 feet. Lots 1, 5, 6, and 10 are corner lots and would be 60 feet in width. The proposed lot depths range from 85 feet to 90 feet. The proposed plat would create 14 lots with the following sizes: Lot Number Lot Size (square feet) Access 1 5,014 Graham Ave NE 2 4,925 Graham Ave NE 3 4,890 Graham Ave NE 4 4,890 Graham Ave NE 5 5,014 Graham Ave NE 6 5,014 Field PI NE 7 4,890 Field PI NE HEX Report 06-143.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Depm t Prefiminary Report to the Hearing Examiner HONI=YBROOK CIRCLE PRELIMINAriYPLAT LUA-06-143, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2007 Page 6 of 9 8 4,890 Field PI NE 9 4,925 Field PI NE 10 5,014 Field PI NE 11 4,500 Field PI NE 12 4,500 Field PI NE 13 4,500 Field PI NE 14 4,500 Field PI NE As proposed, all lots appear to be in compliance with the required lot width, depth and size standards Setbacks -- Building setbacks required in the R-8 zone include a front yard and side yard along a street setback of 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for attached garages, an interior side yard setback of 5 feet, and a rear yard setback of 20 feet. The building setback requirements for the new residences would be reviewed at the time of building permit review. An existing stable and shed are located on the project site and are proposed to be removed. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a demolition permit be obtained and all required inspections completed for the removal of the shed and stable prior to the recording of the final plat. Building Standards — The R-8 zone permits one residential structure per lot. Each of the proposed lots would support the construction of one detached single family residence. Accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. Accessory structures are permitted only when associated with a primary structure iocated on the same parcel, Building height in the R-8 zone is limited to two stories and 30 feet for primary structures and 15 feet for detached accessory structures. The R-8 zone restricts lots greater than 5,000 square feet in size to a maximum building coverage of 35% or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater. The height and lot coverage of the new residences would be verified at the time of application for building permits. Parking — Each detached dwelling unit is required to provide two off-street parking stalls per unit. The proposed building pads appear to be adequately sized for the provision of the required parking. Landscaping — The City's landscaping regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public right-of-way. The minimum width of landscaping required along the street frontage for sites abutting an arterial street is ten feet. Along a non -arterial public street five feet of landscaping must be installed. If there is additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of the five or ten feet, this must also be landscaped. If sufficient area is not available within the public right-of-way due to required improvements, the landscape strip may be located within private property abutting the public right-of-way. The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately, In addition, the applicant is required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1- 1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots or within the proposed planting strip. The applicant provided a landscape plan with the project application. A 5-foot planting strip consisting of Kinnikinnick is proposed to be installed within the front yard areas of the proposed lots abutting the public right-of-way. Along the side yards of Lots 1, 5, 6, and 10 a 5-foot landscaped buffer consisting of Incense Cedar, Zabel Laurel, Rockrose, Julia Phelps Wild Lilac, Big Bluestem, and Salal is proposed. Two new trees are proposed within the front yard areas of each lot. The tree species proposed are Silver Linden. Capital Flowering Pear, and Autumn Blaze Maple. The proposed landscape plan appears to comply with the City's landscaping requirements. A detailed landscape plan will be required to be submitted at the time of building permit application. C. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Lot Arrangement: Side lot lines are to be at right angles to street lines, and each lot must have access to a public street or road. The proposed lots are at right angles to the streets and have access to public roads. HEX Report 46-143.doc City of Renton PIB/PW Depai I Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-06-143, PP, FGF PUBLIC NEARING DATE: February 6, 2007 Page 7 of 9 Lots: The size, shape and orientation of lots must meet the minimum area and width requirements of the applicable zoning classification and must be appropriate for the type of development and use contemplated. Each of the proposed lots is rectangular in shape, oriented to provide front yards facing a street, and satisfies the minimum lot area and dimension requirements of the R-8 zone. When considering the required setbacks, as well as access points for each lot, the proposed lots appear to have sufficient building area for the development of detached single family homes. Property Corners at Intersections: All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights -of -way, except alleys, shall have minimum radius of 15 feet. Access and Street Improvements.: Primary access to the lots would be from a new internal looped access road (Graham Ave NE, NE 7 St, Field PI NE, and NE 61h St). Field PI NE and Graham Ave NE would be extensions of roads under construction for the Honey Brooke West subdivision. NE 61h Street along the frontage of the project site is currently under construction for the Honey Brooke West subdivision and the proposed project would be required to complete the frontage improvements on the project side of the street. The aplicant has applied for a modification to the street standards, to reduce the right-of-way width of NE 6' Street and Field Avenue NE to 42 feet wide, NE 71h Street to 26 feet wide, and Graham Avenue NE to 27 feet wide with improvements on the development side to include sidewalk, curb, and gutter. The modification request was granted January 8, 2007 with 2 conditions: 1. "No Parking" signs shall be installed at any location where the pavement width is less than twenty-eight feet (28'), 2. In lieu of the buffering of five feet (5') between the development and the neighbors (along the east property line), a solid wood decorative fence meeting City of Renton code requirements for height shall be constructed along the full length of the property prior to recording of the final plat. Street improvements required along NE 6"' Street, Graham Avenue NE, NE 71h Street, and Field Place NE include paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks adjacent to the curb, and street lighting. The street lighting system shall be designed and installed per City of Renton standards and specifications. Private street lighting systems (including Puget Sound Energy) are not permitted. All wire utilities must be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. To mitigate impacts to the local street system, the City's Environmental Review Committee requires the payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75 per net new average daily trip attributed to the proposed subdivision. The proposed 14 new residential lots would be expected to generate approximately 133.98 new average weekday trips based on 9.57 daily trips. The fee for the proposed plat is estimated to be $10,048.50 (133,98 total trips x $75.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the plat. Topography and Vegetation: The site topography slopes gently to the south and west with an approximate elevation change of 20 feet. Earthwork activities are estimated at 1,500 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of fill. The majority of the grading would result from the construction of the road, building pads, utilities, and detention facility. To mitigate the potential for erosion to occur from the subject site, the City's Environmental Review Committee required that the construction of the project comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the most current Stormwater Management Manual. Vegetation on the project site consists primarily of a mature forest with a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees as well as an under story of brush and saplings. RMC 4-4-070 requires that existing trees and other vegetation be used to augment new plantings for landscaping where practical, and RMC 4-7-130 requires that a reasonable effort should be made to preserve existing trees. A Determination was made, by the Director of Development Services that the retention or replacement of 25% of the existing trees would achieve these requirements. If 25% of the existing trees cannot be retained, then the trees shall be replaced at a ratio of one to one with trees of a minimum caliper of 2 inches. The submitted significant tree plan identifies 166 significant trees on the project site. Based on the required retention or replacement rate of 25%, a total of 42 trees are required to be retained or replaced. The tree retention plan identifies 28 trees that are proposed to be retained, therefore an additional 14 2-inch caliper trees are required to be planted on the project site to attain the 25% retentionlreplacement ratio. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that a Tree Retention Plan be submitted with the Utility Construction Permit application identifying the trees to be retained and the measures to be taken to ensure the'trees are protected during project construction. The plan shall also identify the replacement HEX Report 06-143.do6 City of Renton P/B/PW Depar Preliminary Report to the Nearing Examiner HONEYBROOKCIRCLE PRELIMINAr2YPLAT LUA-06-143, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 6, 2007 Page 8 of 9 trees and shall include the planting location, species type, and planting specifications. This plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager. Relationship to Existing Uses: The project site is bounded to the north and east by existing single family residential development. The south side of the project site is bounded by the Honey Brooke West subdivision, which is currently under construction and was approved under the same R-8 development standards. The west side of the project is bounded by a multi -family residential development. The proposal for 14 lots on the project site would not be out of character with the existing or recent development in the surrounding area. D. Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the applicant's provision of Code required improvements and fees. The City's Environmental Review Committee is requiring payment of a Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $488 per new single-family home. The fee is estimated at $6,832 (14 new lots x $488) and is payable prior to the recording of the plat. Recreation: The proposal would not include any on -site recreation space for future residents of the proposed plat. There are no existing recreational facilities in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future demand on existing City Parks and recreational facilities and programs. Therefore, the City's Environmental Review Committee is requiring the applicant to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per new single-family home. The fee is estimated at $7,430.64 (14 new lots x $530.76) and is also payable prior to the recording of the plat. Schools: The site is located within the boundaries of the Renton School District No. 403. According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed plat would potentially result in 6 additional students (0.44 x 14). The School District has indicated that it could accommodate the new students. The children would be assigned to the following schools: Maplewood Heights Elementary (bussing available), McKnight Middle School (bussing available), Hazen High School (within walking distance). Storm Drainage/Surface Water: A Preliminary Technical Information Report prepared by Jaeger Engineering, dated November 9, 2006 was submitted with the application materials. According to the report the existing drainage sheet flows across the property to the southwest. The proposed method of drainage control as indicated by the storm drainage report would be a detention vault located within proposed Tract A at the southwest corner of the project site. The City's Plan Review Section has reviewed the submitted drainage report. Due to potential downstream drainage problems, the City's Environmental Review Committee required that the project comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual as mitigation. Staff recommends as a condition of approval the establishment of a homeowner's association to ensure responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A Surface Water System Development Charge, based on the current rate of $759.00 per new single- family lot, would be required prior to the issuance of construction permits for the plat. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The subject site is in the area of Water District 90. A certificate of water availability from WD 90 was submitted with the project application. Waster main improvements, including fire hydrants and domestic water services will be required within the existing and proposed streets in accordance with Water District 90 and City of Renton standards. The applicant shall verify with Water District 90 all fees, permits, submittal, and review of water main improvement plans. The final design of the water main improvements shall be approved by the District with concurrence from the City of Renton. HEX Report 06-143.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Depai t Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-06-143, PP, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE. February 6, 2007 Page 9 of 9 All new construction shall have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm fire flow and shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. If the proposed residential structures exceed 3,600 square feet in area (including garage area), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 gpm and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. Based on the project layout, it appears that an additional fire hydrant may be required to meet this requirement. All fire hydrants shall be per the City specifications regardless of the water district boundaries. Any existing hydrants to,be counted towards the fire flow requirements shall be field verified. The applicant shall show the location and distance of all existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site. Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings, if not already in place. The subject property is served by City of Renton sewer service. There is an existing 12-inch sanitary sewer main in Hoquiam Avenue NE to the south at the approximate intersection of Hoquiam Avenue NE and NE 51" Street. See City of Renton drawing number S2813, project name is Windsong. There is also an 8-inch sewer main under construction in the Honey Brooke West subdivision located to the south of the project site. An 8-inch sewer main will be required to be extended onto the project site from the sewer main currently under construction in the Honey Brooke West subdivision to serve the proposed lots. The applicant will be required to negotiate any necessary easements with the property owner. Individual side sewers will be required to serve the new lots, dual side sewers are not permitted. The project site is located within the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). These fees are $316.80 per unit and are collected at the time of utility construction permit issuance. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) is $1,017 per building lot. This fee is payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat, Project File No. LUA-06-143, PP, ECF subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 2007. 2. A demolition permit shall be obtained and all required inspections shall be completed for the removal of the existing shed and stable prior to the recording of the final plat. 3. A Tree Retention/Replacement Plan shall be submitted with the Utility Construction Permit Application to the Development Services Division project manager. The plan shall identify trees to be retained and measures to be taken during construction to ensure the trees are adequately protected. The plan shall also identify replacement trees and shall include the planting location, species type, and planting specifications. 4. A homeowner's association shall be established for the development, to ensure that responsibility is taken for maintenance of common improvements and tracts within the plat prior to final plat approval. A draft of the agreement, HOA and/or CC&R documents shall be submitted at the time of application for utilities construction permits, so that it may be reviewed by the City attorney and the Development Services project manager. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Preliminary Plats (PP): Five (5) years from final approval (signature) date. HEX Report 06-143.doc, 4c 14 z go 6 Us 6Kll WN —j 4ri W4 so IV M IF 2 IS it Is If if PT. --3"— fp so Jill if so cf. ;I L-it--j if N i ti si- ---------- LD if C14 6 it Ln f�r'1, �, v �tl •s� � • � ,� � � � � rod e d '' I 4 � � •- � `' , . _ r � . Am Trv"TT- - too if A, ,gipis ft -t it t* 401 j9p r �p Is SK Ilh 0 19 )d is 114 A PORTION of the S.S. 114, SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE a R., W.M. LEGAL D$SCIUMON i 'I —SITE THE NEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE l K. �° NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 2.3 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING GOUTY, WASHWGT0IJ; TOGETHER IM1H AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES OVER AND I + ACROSS THE SOUTH 30 FEET AND THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; _ y, EXCEPT ANY PDR71ON FO SAID EASEMENT LYING WITHIN COUNTY RGAD. I S 1 JOr+NSpN HLNNE THE � +� seal• ^,. 1023D59394 1VOR7T! a- . , Nn• L VICINITY MAP ., �'�_f� � Y�—�E .85 ... .. .,.. •. NETS. I•J �' -, ,, N' 7tA 4 ; uoa s _ .. \ •"~ I -- NOTE: ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES r.------7 - f II I ARE TO BE REMOVED. -, SHE DATA =+R- 6 GROSS AREA: 106972 SF >• 2.50 AC. iI AREA IN ROADS: 31005.8 SF - 0.71 AC. 3s� i _ yar�� I J i; I vnurcs roe M�h,ea NET AREA: 77986 SF - 1.79 AC. e I r II K ].elr ALLOWABLE NO. LDTS: 14,32 # .I f 16: 7 0l f 2 I �°iia.c�r.�eoi{� PROPOSED NO. OF LOTS: 14 F ; R PROPOSED DENSITY: 7.82 UNITS/ACRE 535911 Ly ZONING: R-R PROPOSED USE: DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL q �g w o reee: r 1 57 I wl T - - -- -- ? t '^wl c_c}f..:� {f SITE SERVICSSI SEWER; CITY OF RENTON Asa M'2 rroI�I 4I I WATER: : RINO�OSRC. NO. 90 RENTON SCHOOL I7Tff SCHOOL G6 FIR TELEPHONE: Q Y F RENTON ELECTFKAL h GAS: PUGET SOUND ENERGY CABLE T.V.: COMCAST CABtENSDON ` O 6thT.ne.=cLa. - - ttw sp Y EI T, • APO: T02305 920E SITE ADDRESS; 14102 SE 124th ST. _ z ^ .7 Y"'.• LANGLEY DE VELOPMENT y�1 lyr , j S CITY MAP PACE EB t023059t23 tl L�.NCLEY DE V7:LOPMFNT it I a HONEY BROOKE NEST I 1023n",1385 -I 41R I 9 rs w OWNERS: GERALD LEFLER. LESLIE KENWORTHY DESME KEWW]RTHY 41CKY KENWORTHY - 7a�uaam' eflo saurn.+r•r surer er. f.C121DGEur2ey—ing GRAPHIC SCALE w 16 I!0 t.. I fort I- - W I B hA9 3- C IykI�a 0 4 i w o zm wo LO I! N441a0N 3NVI e= !,s An I U x8 f ix Moo N Y 'F IS \I +zs - ss cs �j S nM I ��$ dI WEL -- \_ a. MfiA loin n -� Lj IN ' ri r 3-W.9L 995 I . �6 � oaossaezol I I q dl VM -lq� X3553 �� I I 3W1 1YId 3A lcld IN "sv����9311sTN. ME, �I J O cr a W Z a W Z J n W'A � �y s- 14� J� U- O Of a nW-M (fa) VK mo oa am) 9w «o W �s W;Se JS tarn eaaa oFa fiazl mar uove , 11+Jr NV7d JOW V 9NfQ NO Q= xor 9A wrO w3 s:1 ,.r. 3 t�W JMO& CW40H !4 t 1/pridQ7313d �!lV/lblri' .... # °JNIZl�3NIf)N2�J3'J3vr 8 � } I 4 [7 i k wig 14 I �1 ------------------ 3N 3AV 11MVM 0 1 y l ill F l� I 1 i _ 1 r I r 1 Mn . z- Mvuwakld _.. _ ;., | He,k§NOH - CY � |�a� ,� �� iA �|!•| os na wU¥n c� IsN,w eN� w r,�|||§ §� � §7. . I g Q 2 777 /\ �' ; \. . ���� § | 7 | � � - : a �� . � -- »� r ) 9 D6 - 3 T23N R5E E 1/2 R-8 NE I Oth St. NE 9th St Rig. CD R. -8 NE 7; R-8 CITY OF RENTO. DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-143, PP, ECF APPLICANT: Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Marc Rousso PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Prelimany Piat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 49XX NE 6"' Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Solutions NE, LLC, dated January 11, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most current Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control — a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot. 5. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the recording of the final plat. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $10,048.50 (133.98 net new daily trips x $75 = $10,048,50). 6. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. The fee is estimated at $6,832 ($488 x 14 = $6,832). EiiC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 19, 2007 TO: Jill Ding FROM: Sonja J. Fesser ti SUBJECT: Honeyhrook Circle, LUA-06-143, PP Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced preliminary plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The word "COUNTY" is misspelled in the "LEGAL DESCRIVI"ION" block. Information needed for final plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-OX-XXX-FP and LND-10-0454, respectively, on the drawing sheets. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use, action number. Please note that the land use action number for the final plat will be different from the preliminary plat number and is unknown as of this date. Note two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties are provided. A licensed surveyor will need to prepare, stamp, sign and date the final plat drawing Pursuant to the recently revised WAC 196-23-020, the surveyor's expiration date now needs to be applied manually. Any final document must contain the seal/stamp, handwritten license expiration date by the licensee [,J signature and date of signature of the licensee who prepared or directly supervised the work_ For the purpose of this section "document" is defined as plans, specifications, plats, surveys [,J as -built documents prepared by the licensee [,J and reports. Provide plat and lot closure calculations. IHAFiie SyskE.,ND - LAmd Subdivision & Surveying RecordsUND-14- Pla€s\0454TV070i 19.doc January 23, 2007 Page 2 Note the date the existing monuments were visited, per WAC 332-130-1.50, and what was found. Complete City of Renton Monument Cards, with reference points of all new right-of-way monuments set as part of the plat. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC 332-130-100. Required City of Renton signatures (on the final plat submittal) include the Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works, the Mayor and the City Clerk. An approval block for the city's Finance Director is also required. Appropriate King County approval blocks need to be noted on the plat drawing. All vested owners of the plat property need to sign the final plat document. Include notary blocks as needed. Include a dedication/certification block on the plat drawing. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. On the final submittal, remove all references to utility facilities, topog lines and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. Remove all references to building setback lines. Setbacks will be determined at the time of issuance of building permits. Remove all references to density and zoning on the final submittal. Note encroachments, if any. Note all easements, agreements and covenants of record on the drawing. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots after the preliminary plat is approved_ The addresses (and street names) will need to be noted on the plat document. Note whether the adjoining properties are platted (give plat name and lot number) or unplatted. Remove all references to density and zoning information from the final plat drawing. If there is a Restrictive Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions document for this plat, then reference the same on the plat drawing and provide a space for the recording number thereof. Note that if there are restrictive covenants, easements or agreements to others (neighboring property owners, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the plat. The plat drawings and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The plat document will be recorded first (with King County). The recording number(s) H:IFjlc Sys1LND - land subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-10 - Platsl04541RV0701 19.doulcor January 23, 2007 Page 3 for the associated document(s) (said documents recorded concurrently with, but following the plat) need to be referenced on the plat drawings. If there is a Homeowners' Association (HOA) for this plat, the following language concerning ownership of "TRACT A" (drainage) applies to this plat and should be noted on the final plat drawing as follows: Upon the recording of this plat, Tract A is hereby granted and conveyed to the Plat rlf Honeybrook Circle Homeowners' Association (HOA) for drainage purposes. All necessary maintenance activities for said Tract will be the responsibility of the HOA. In the event that the HOA is dissolved or otherwise fails to meet its property tax obligations, as evidenced by non-payment of property taxes for a period of eighteen (18) months, then each lot in this plat shall assume and have an equal and undivided ownership interest in the Tract previously owned by the HOA and have the attendant financial and maintenance responsibilities. If there is no Homeowners' Association, use the following text on the final plat drawing: Lots 1 through 14 shall have an equal and undivided ownership interest in "Tract A". The forgoing statement is to be accompanied by language defining the maintenance responsibilities for any infrastructure located on the Tract serving the plat, or reference a separate recorded instrument detailing the same. NOTE: The City of Renton does not assume ownership of drainage detention tracts created via the establishment of plats. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for the preliminary plat review is provided for your use and information. H:Wile Sys%LND - Land subdivision & surveying Records%LND-10 - Plats104541R V0701 l9-doocor PROPERTY 'ICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISIO. qo. 2006 - _r.4 (mow) APPLICANT:. __ , _, F'I'MPId l 1:z & -Lr LygA ," ,. &1&�[' RECEIVED FROM JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WORK: - X PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION B LONG PLAT, SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, THIS REVIEW REPLACES PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# 1O 30S - 521 -- (date) IWO# 77(7D77 IILND # 100*ff7ia r54. NEED MORE INFORMATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION " PID Ps VICINITY MAP SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER FRONT FOOTAGE X NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developerlowner on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on -site and off -site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to cbange without notice. Final fees wilt be based on rates in effect at time of Building Perr it/Construction Permit application. The existing house on SP Lot # , addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The followin-e quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS DISTRICT NO. PARCEL NO. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT UNITS ASSESSMENT OR FEE Latecomer A ement yt) WATER Latecomer Agreement vt) WASTEWATER Latecomer A reement (vt) OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER PiEmTc)w 1 Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER u"M 1 . ao Joint Use Agreement (METRO) Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER Estimated Pd Prev. - Partial. Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd # OF UNITS/ SQ. FrG. SDC FEE Sin le family residential $1,956/unit x W Mobile home dwelling unit $1,956/unit in park AftMD'ew W-6Zra1-+ Apartment, Condo $1,174/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.273/sq. ft. of pro erty (not less than $1,956.00) x Boeing, by Special AgreementlFootprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CIiARGE - WASTEWATER - Estimated _ Pd Prev. - Partial. Pd (Ltd Exemption) " Never Pd Single family residential $1,017/unit x 14 Mobile home dwelling unit $1,017/unit x Apartment, Condo $610/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial $0.142/s . ft. of property x(not less than $1,017.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SURFACEWATER " Estimated Pd Prev. - PartialI Pd (Ltd Exemption) - Never Pd Sin le family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $759/unit x 14 1 All other properties $0.265/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than $759Aa) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ N O n o 31gnaturd Revie ' g Authority bAtE °5 H *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. c Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. Current City SDC fee charges apply to 0 EFFECTIVE January 8, 2006 Cif lenton Department of Planning / Building I 1 Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:REOat-kr• COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 95, 2046_ APPLICATION NO: LUA06-143, PP, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 1, 2006 APPLICANT: Marc Rousso PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding R PROJECT TITLE: Hone brook Circle Preliminary Plat PLAN REVIEW: Ameta Henninger SITE AREA: 108,972 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross)-- NIA CITY UF LOCATION: 49XX NE d' Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77677 UTILITY SYSTEMS SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) -COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air water Plants LandlShorehne Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hUGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistanclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 1000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody L. Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on January 12, 2007. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $142.10. too Barton — -- / gal Advertising Representative, King County Journal Subscribed and sworn to me this 12eh day of January, 2007. B D Cantelon Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Kent. Washington PO Number: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL D ETF RNT INAMN ENV'IR.OMIENTAL REVIEW COh4MMEE & PUBLIC H1•;rI iINCr R.la;NTO , WASHINGTOI The Envirnrnnenta Review C`oni- mittee, has issued a Determination of Non Signific,ince-hlitigat4�d tar the following project under the authority of the Kenton Municipal Code. Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat LUA06-14,9, PP, ECI+ Location: 49XX NE 6th Street. (parcel no. 102305-92081. The applicant is requesting Pre- liminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the suixfiti ision of an existing 108,972 square foot [2.5 acre'! parcel located within the Residential - 8 1R-81 deeding unit per acre roving designot.ion. The proposed loi,wrnild range in area from 4,500 sgnaro feet to 5,011 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would he pravided via a new ini ernal public street cyst<ern, �� bleb would �Jcecss off of NTE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. Appeals of the environri mnt.al. deterimnation must be tiled in writing on or before 5!00 PM on January 26, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required , 75.00 application fee with: Hearing Exam- iner City of Renton, 1055 S6nth Grady Way, Rentrm, WA 98055. Appeals W the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Ivlunicipal Codc Section 4-8- 1.10M, Additional inforniation regard- ing the appeal process mxy he obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Publk Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on February 6, 2007 at 9:00 ANT to consider- the. Prvlirninazry Plat. if the Environmental Determination is ap- pealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. lrrterestecl parties are invited to attend the public hearing - Published in the King County Journal January 12, 200'i _ tt8626(A CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 101h day of January, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Eric LaBrie Contact Marc Rousso Applicant Leslie Kenthworthy - Estate of Sylvia Lefler Owner Langley Development Group, Inc. POR Kay Haynes POR Norm Lane POR Kenneth Johnson POR (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker purposesned ) mentionednin the nstrt and >°rneedged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act Yr uses ,and Dated: z Notary Public in/And for the � shin to r ; Notary (Print): 111& My appointment expires: Project Name: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat Project Number: LUA06-143, PP, ECF template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology * - WDFW - Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 160`h Ave SE 39015 — 172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Meiissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division " Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources j PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attm Mr, Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd, 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 160" Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 ! Seattle, WA 98124-4018 — J Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template - affidavit of service by mailing iO4 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA(I6-1143, PP, ECF LOCATION: 49XX NE 61h Street IParcel no. 502305.9208) DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 109,972 square toot 12.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-81 dweh'sn9 unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range In area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the propoand iota would be provided via a new Internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the envlrnnmental determination must he filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 26, 2007. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $T5.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Rrnton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 00055, Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton Chy Clark's Office, 14251 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY_ RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON FEBRUARY 6, 2007 AT 9.OD AM TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ES APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT {425) 430-7200- DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please InWude the project NUMBER when calling for proper fills kisntlFlcation. CERTIFICATION I �Tli 6E ISETz hereby certify that 3 copies of the above do , MV4%,l, were posted by mein conspicuous places or nearby the described proam; DATE: 1 J j2- SIGNED: r ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington rending in w . rZ on the I t "\ day of L C� " ` 1~' INO ARY P ELIC S � ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-143, PP, ECF LOCATION: 49XX NE 6th Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 26, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON FEBRUARY 6, 2007 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. �,FlmW- w FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper fife identification. CIT' OF RENTON ♦ '� ru Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 10, 2007 Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting 33915 1 st Way S #200 Federal Way 98003 SUBJECT: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat LUA06-143, PP, ECF Dear Mr. LaBrie: Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non - Significance -Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Section C for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 26, 2007. Appeals must be fled in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on February 6, 2007 at 9:00 AM to consider the Preliminary Plat. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. if you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Jill K. Ding Senior Planner cc: Leslie Kentworthy - Estate of Sylvia Lefler / Owner(s) Kay Haynes, Norm Lane, Kenneth Johnson, Langley Development Group, Inc. / Party(ies) of Record Marc Rousso / Applicant Enclosure 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 R E N T O N ,iH KAD Of THE. CURVE Thfs papercor•.;a�ns.�U"o reuycled material, 3C°! post consumer Kathy Keolker, Mayor January10, 2007 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations CIT' , OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWor'ks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on January 8, 2007: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA06-143, PP, ECF LOCATION: 49XX NE 6th Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 26, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing E=xaminer,.City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055_ Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, i Jill K. Ding Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Enclosure 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 0 This papercorrtalns 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consume, RENTON lHF.AD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTOI _ DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-143, PP, ECF APPLICANT. Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Marc Rousso PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Prelimany Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 49XX NE 6th Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Solutions NE, LLC, dated January 11, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume 11 of the most current Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The detention system f)r this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control — a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot. 5. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the recording of the final plat. It is articipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $10,048.50 (133.98 net new daily trips x $75 = $10,048.50). 6. Staff recommends thafthe applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. The fee is estimated at $6,832 ($488 x 14 = $6,832). ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTOI _ DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-143, PP, ECF APPLICANT: Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Marc Rousso PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Prelimany Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 49XX NE 61h Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 44-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 130 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m, and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3, Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. Two ornamental trees,:a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), shall be planted or retained within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. 5. The minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non -arterial public street is 5 feet provided that if there is additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of 5 feet, this shall also be landscaped. A determination has been made that if no additional area is available within the public right-of-way due to required improvements, the 5- foot landscaped strip may be located within private property abutting the public right-of-way. The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately. 6. A detailed landscape plan complying with the requirements set forth under RMC 4-8-120D shall be submitted at the time of Final Plan review for review and approval by the Development Services Division Project Manager. Fire 1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area (including garage area), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 3 2. Street address must be visible from a public street. 3. Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with a Storz "quick disconnect' fitting. 4. Fire department access roads are required to be paved, 20 feet wide. Plan Review — Surface Water 1. A storm drainage narrative was submitted with the formal application. The applicant shall provide storm connections for the individual lots prior to recording the plat. 2. Surface Water System Development Charge is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit, Fees may be subject to change. Plan Review — Water 1. Water main improvements, including fire hydrants and domestic water services will be required within the existing and proposed streets in accordance with Water District 90 and City of Renton standards. 2. The applicant shall verify with the District all fees, permits, submittal, and review of the water main improvement plans. 3_ Final design plans for water main improvements shall be approved by the District with concurrence from the City of Renton. 4. Any new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm fire flow and shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. If the proposed single family structures exceed 3,600 square feet in area (including garage), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 gpm and requires two hydrants within 300 feet for the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. An additional fire hydrant may be required as part of this project to meet this criteria. All fire hydrants shall be per the City specifications. These City of Renton requirements are applicable to the entire proposal regardless of water district boundaries. 5. The applicant and engineer shall field verify and show the location and distance of all existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site. Plan Review — Sanitary Sewer 1. This project will be required to extend and 8-inch sewer main from the main currently under construction south of the proposed development to serve the proposed lots, 2. The applicant will be required to negotiate any necessary easements with the property owner. 3. Individual side sewers will be required to be installed to serve the new lots. Dual side sewers are not allowed. 4. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. Fees are subject to change. 5. This property is located within the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). These fees are $316.80 per unit and are collected at the time the construction permit is issued, Plan Review — Transportation 1. The project will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way for a total right-of-way width of 50 feet for NE 61h Street. 2. The project will be required to install street improvements along NE 61h Street including additional paving for a full pavement width of 32 feet, curb, gutter, and sidewalks adjacent to the curb. 3. The new streets interior to the plat must be developed to City standards. If a right-of-way modification is approved, the required right-of-way width is 42 feet with 32 feet of paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks adjacent to the curb, and street lighting. The further proposed reductions would also require approval of a street modification. 4. Street lights will be required to be installed by this project on NE 6"' Street, and in the new plat. The street lighting system shall be designed and installed per City of Renton standards and specifications_ Private (including PSE) street lighting systems are not allowed. 5. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the plat. ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 Plan Review - General 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer, 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the current City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network. 3. Permit applications must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000_ Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Property Services 1. To be sent under separate cover. ERC Advisory Notes Page 3 of 3 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-143, PP, ECF APPLICANT: Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Marc Rousso PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Prelimany Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 49XX NE 61h Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on January 26, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: January 12, 2007 DATE OF DECISION: January 8, 2007 SIGNATURES: Gr g 2im e an i r to D to t. David aniels, Fire Chief Planning) it in ublic Works Fire Department Z), ob-07 Date �1 Terry Hig shiyama, Administrator bate Alex Pietsch, Administrator Community Services EDNSP STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE January 8, 2007 Project Name: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat Applicant: Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Marc Rousso File Number: LUA-06-143, PP, ECF Project Manager: Project Description Project Location -- Exist. Bldg. Area gsf. Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. (Project Description continued on next page). 49XX NE 6th Street (parcel no. 102305-9208) NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area. NIA Site Area, 108,972 sf (2.5-acres) Total Building Area gsf.- NIA RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map ercrpi HoneybrookCirde.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departm nmentat Review Committee Staff Report HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PREL . 'PLAT LUA06-443, PP, ECF REPORT OF January 8, 2007 Page 2 of 7 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal would result in the construction of 14 detached single family residences on 14 lots. The project site is located north of NE 6ch Street and west of Hoquiam Avenue NE and is zoned Residential — 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre. An existing stable and shed are proposed to be removed. A wetland reconnaissance was submitted with the project application, no wetlands were found on the project site. The project would result in approximately 1,500 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of fill. The majority of the grading required for the project would be for the construction of the proposed roads, building pads, utilities, and stormwater detention facility. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new looped internal public street off of NE 61h Street. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE XX NON - SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Solutions NE, LLC, dated January 11, 2006. 2, The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume 11 of the most current Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control — a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. 4. The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot. 5. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the recording of the final plat. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $10,048.50 (133.98 net new daily trips x $75 = $10,048.50). 6. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. The fee is estimated at $6,832 ($488 x 14 = $6,832). D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth With the project application, the applicant submitted a Geotechnical Report prepared by Earth Solutions NW, LLC, dated January 11, 2006. According to the report the site topography slopes gently to the south ercrpt_HoneybrookCi rde.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departm nmental Review Committee Staff Report HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PREL ' PLAT LUA06-143, PP, ECF REPORT OF January 8, 2007 Page 3 of 7 and west with an approximate elevation change of 20 feet. Vegetation on the project site consists primarily of a mature forest with a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees as well as an under story of brush and saplings. Seven test pits were excavated on the project site. Topsoil was encountered in the top three to eight inches at all of the test pits. Underlying the topsoil, native soils were encountered. The native soils consisted of medium dense to dense silty sand and silty sand with gravel. The soil density increased with depth. The geologic map of the area identifies glacially consolidated till soil (Qvt) throughout the site. The King County Soil Survey identifies the presence of the Alderwood (AgB and AgC) series gravelly sandy loam throughout the project site. According to the submitted report, the results of the field work correlated with that mapped designations. The report provided recommendations for site preparation and earthwork, excavation and slopes, rockeries and modular block walls, utility trench backfill, pavement sections, foundations, slab -on -grade floors, retaining walls, drainage, and seismic consideration. Due to the potential for impacts that could occur during construction, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that construction of the project be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Solutions NW, LLC, dated January 11, 2006 that was submitted with the project application. The applicant's SEPA checklist indicates that earthwork activities are estimated at 1,500 cubic yards of cut and 500 cubic yards of fill. The majority of the grading would result from the construction of the road, building pads, utilities, and detention facility. Due to the potential for erosion to occur from the subject site, staff recommends a mitigation measure that requires the applicant to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the most current Stormwater Management Manual. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Earth Solutions NE, LLC, dated January 11, 2006. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most current Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Water — Stormwater A Preliminary Technical Information Report prepared by Jaeger Engineering, dated November 9, 2006 was submitted with the application materials. According to the report the existing drainage sheet flows across the property to the southwest. The proposed method of drainage control as indicated by the storm drainage report would be a detention vault located within proposed Tract A at the southwest corner of the project site. The City's Plan Review Section has reviewed the submitted drainage report. Due to potential downstream drainage problems, staff recommends a mitigation measure that would require the project to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control — a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. Mitigation: The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control — a.k.a. Level 2) and water quality improvements. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, King County Surface Water Design Manual ercrpt_Ho neybroo kCi rd e. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departm nmental Review Committee Staff Report HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PREL 'PLAT LUA06-743, PP, ECF REPORT OF January 8, 2007 Page 4 of 7 3. Plants The site is currently vegetated with 166 significant trees. A total of 28 of the existing significant trees are proposed to be retained throughout the site_ The remainder of trees would be removed for the construction of building pads, roadways, the stormwater vault, and the installation of utility lines. A total of 25 percent of existing trees are required to be retained or replaced on -site. The proposal to retain 28 trees would result in a retention rate of 17 percent. A total of 14 2-inch caliper trees will be required to be planted to comply with the significant tree retention/replacement requirements. Mitigation: ion: No further mitigation is recommended Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 4. Recreation The proposal does not provide on -site recreat anticipated that the proposed development we recreational facilities and programs. Therefore, applicant pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based estimated at $7,430.64 (14 new lots x $530.76 final plat. )n areas for future residents of the proposed plat. It is uld generate future demand on existing City parks and staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring that the in $530.76 per each new single-family lot. The fee is = $7,430.64) and is payable prior to the recording of the Mitigation: The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new single family lot. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 5. Transportation Access to the project would be provided via a "looped" residential access road off of NE 61h Street. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in impacts to the City's street system. Therefore, staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the recording of the final plat. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $10,048.50 (133.98 net new daily trips x $75 = $10,048.50). Mitigation: The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75 for each new net daily trip prior to the recording of the final plat. It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in the payment of $10,048.50 (133.98 net new daily trips x $75 = $10,048.50). Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 6. Emergency Services The proposal will add new residential units to the City that will potentially impact the City's Police and Fire Emergency Services. Staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new lot prior to the recording of the final plat. The fee is estimated at $6,832 ($488 x 14 = $6,832). Mitigation: Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. The fee is estimated at $6,832 ($488 x 14 = $6,832). Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Advisory Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ercrpt_H oneybroo kQ rde. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departm nmental Review Committee Staff Report NONEYBROOK CIRCLE PREL YPLAT LUA06-143, PP, ECF REPORT OF January 8, 2007 Page 5 of 7 Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be fired in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. January 26, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by the City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office at (425) 430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. Two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-112 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), shall be planted or retained within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. 5. The minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non -arterial public street is 5 feet provided that if there is additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of 5 feet, this shall also be landscaped. A determination has been made that if no additional area is available within the public right-of-way due to required improvements, the 5-foot landscaped strip may be located within private property abutting the public right-of-way. The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately. 6. A detailed landscape plan complying with the requirements set forth under RMC 4-8-120D shall be submitted at the time of Final Plan review for review and approval by the Development Services Division Project Manager. Fire 1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 square feet in area (including garage area), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Street address must be visible from a public street. 3. Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with a Storz "quick disconnect" fitting. 4. Fire department access roads are required to be paved, 20 feet wide. Plan Review — Surface Water 1. A storm drainage narrative was submitted with the formal application. The applicant shall provide storm connections for the individual lots prior to recording the plat. 2. Surface Water System Development Charge is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit. Fees may be subject to change. Plan Review — Water 1. Water main improvements, including fire hydrants and domestic water services will be required within the existing and proposed streets in accordance with Water District 90 and City of Renton standards. ercrpt_HoneybrookCirde.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departm nmental Review Committee Staff Report HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PREL _ 'PLAT LUA06-143, PP, ECF REPORT OF January 8, 2007 Page 8 of 7 2. The applicant shall verify with the District all fees, permits, submittal, and review of the water main improvement plans. 3. Final design plans for water main improvements shall be approved by the District with concurrence from the City of Renton. 4. Any new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm fire flow and shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. If the proposed single family structures exceed 3,600 square feet in area (including garage), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 gpm and requires two hydrants within 300 feet for the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route. An additional fire hydrant may be required as part of this project to meet this criteria. All fire hydrants shall be per the City specifications. These City of Renton requirements are applicable to the entire proposal regardless of water district boundaries. 5. The applicant and engineer shall field verify and show the location and distance of all existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site. Plan Review —Sanitary Sewer 1. This project will be required to extend and 8-inch sewer main from the main currently under construction south of the proposed development to serve the proposed lots. 2. The applicant will be required to negotiate any necessary easements with the property owner. 3. Individual side sewers will be required to be installed to serve the new lots. Dual side sewers are not allowed. 4. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. Fees are subject to change. 5. This property is located within the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). These fees are $316.80 per unit and are collected at the time the construction permit is issued. Plan Review — Transportation 1. The project will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way for a total right-of-way width of 50 feet for NE 6`h Street. 2. The project will be required to install street improvements along NE 61h Street including additional paving for a full pavement width of 32 feet, curb, gutter, and sidewalks adjacent to the curb. 3. The new streets interior to the plat must be developed to City standards. If a right-of-way modification is approved, the required right-of-way width is 42 feet with 32 feet of paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks adjacent to the curb, and street lighting. The further proposed reductions would also require approval of a street modification. 4. Street lights will be required to be installed by this project on NE 61h Street, and in the new plat. The street lighting system shall be designed and installed per City of Renton standards and specifications. Private (including PSE) street lighting systems are not allowed. 5. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the plat. Plan Review — General 1 _ All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the current City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network. 3_ Permit applications must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements_ The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the ercrpt_H oneybrookCi rde.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departm onmental Review Committee Staff Report HONEYSROOK CIRCLE PREL 'PLAT LUA06-143, PP, ECF REPORT OF January 8, 2007 Page 7 of 7 permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Property Services 1. To be sent under separate cover. ercrpt_Honeybrookcirde.doc A POR77ON of the S.E. 114, SECUON 10, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE S E., !f af. JCHNSON KFNNET" F .lP ' 023059394 NiE M ST._ I a v^ 12 f, I lo:, 7 2 4 II�ti 3 ., i ane or S , u4a $ R ue qq � �2 i- ml LL-4 , I_L_J. \ IYt 61h T.: ; LA4GLLY DEVELGPMENI yy3 z 1023059/23 1 HONEY BROOKE WESTi AriwAe+nrr .r0 enww* ('LDittrEur!ey2ng� er LEGAL DESCRIP770N THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE S EAST, W.M., IN KING COUTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 30 FEET AND THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; EXCEPT ANY PORTION FQ SAID EASEMENT LYING WITHIN COUNTY ROAD. LANGLEY OEVEt OPMENT r023059385 NOTE: ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED. siTE- I �$ �� — 'l , I Sial. NORFk '- uu. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. SM DATA GROSS AREA 109972 Sf - 7.50 AC. AREA IN ROADS 31005.E Sr — 0.71 AC NET AREA: 779,56 SF — 1.79 All ALLOWABLE NO. LOTS 14.32 PROPOSED NO. OF LOTS: 14 PROPOSED DENSITY: 7.82 UNITS/ACRE ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED USE: DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL S1T13' SERVICES SEWER: GTY OF RENTON WATER: KING COUNTY WATER DIST, NO, 90 SCHOOL: RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE: CITY OF RENTON TELEPHONE: CWEST ELECTMAL & GAS: PUGET SOUND ENERGY CABLE T.V.: COMCAST CABLEYISION APN: 102305 920E SITE ADDRESS: 14102 SE 1241h ST. CITY MAP PAGE E6 OWNERS: GERALD LEFEER. LESLIE KENWORTHY DEBBIE KEFNWORTHY VICKY KENWORTHY CRAPMC SCAIE p A !0 [llI ,RT> I Nth - .a 11. z IL' zs3 wAij, W qkt W d Z F- cs a (cc?) vw i fce -m (rsr) 'w --ud ItOB6 'Ym '1wx .Wld 'wtoz '135 6I46 $ JNW33NIO N3 N303Vr NY7d AVI ? V j eaao-9.E r910Z)yd 39YNlYditT 'QYObI 7YR1d30ND3 ➢9SL %06 Yl'd 13TJHlU.3MOObVA3NOH-40.LY-?d� 1N3ndo73h3O oHVMAVr R � 9N 7AY KMb-OH 4 -� LIE S !r i r N = K o� NVYI2ION 3Nv] _° (y :F Lo I3 � ; Ir} Ww I R3 _------_[--._�—.._�__--� ii dK +r - t✓ 4 _ _ Z Ym h YMx�lli 0. �2 Ay rat m J !I F I fi LLJ Ls G 1 J w _ w• I r ri'fiLC 3.90.04005 I oea6soszol dl vM-lvC' OS53 I 0. 'II • I I'jjI d ail N v� yrY� Is as W,Ps �!g 3Nr1 1Yld I0 "f$� 4"s 3 1 4 3 � 3 " 3�� x�� 3 3 i. 3� f- Lj Z yeei L� J 0 Q' CL Wyk J a a + =) w Ff „oa-.= rrrtl .A• , ® is ecru 3s mcs� �v ne rsxJ err i} itYWE v a 7 »N ei*f NY7d 3321l 9N/QY21;i I ONI?! 3N13N3 W303Vr �.... i 37�MO 3)WM$l3wH Jo lY7cf o}� N }& F p i r 8 .3N 34Y IfYlIVW- I Q e A �FOiT%. ■ s 3H 3AV HVHVWD ;;F' 3N "ld Ql3U -t/7i �� SE 117in Ri-4 R-4 E61:48°O 10 T23N R5E E 1/2 5310 '1 i CIT ' lF RENTON ♦ bA + Kathy Keolker, Mayor iN January 8, 2007 James Jaeger, P.E. Jaeger Engineering 9419 S. 204"' Place Kent, WA 98031 Planning/Building/PublieWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Honeybrooke Circle PP (LUA06-143) Request for Modification — Street Width Dear Mr. Jaeger: We have reviewed the proposed street modification request associated with the proposed single-family residential plat located generally west of the intersection of NE 6`h Street and Hoquiam Avenue NE. This is an infitl development in an existing neighborhood with two (2) eventual points of access. The existing streets are, or will be, pavement with all pedestrian improvements. The proposed modification requests to allow the proposed NE 6"' Street and Field Avenue NE to be reduced to 42-feet wide, NE 7"' Street be 26-feet wide, and Graham Avenue NE be reduced to 27-feet wide with improvements on the development side to include sidewalk, curb and gutter. The Street Modification request is hereby approved with two (2) conditions. City Code 4-6-050 (Street Standards) requires full street improvements for all adjacent rights -of -way for, within, and dedicated by a plat. The City can modify street improvements for new plats if there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the Street Improvement Ordinance. The Modification Procedures as defined in Section 4-9-250D clearly states the criteria for approval by the department Administrator. In order for a modification to be approved, the department Administrator trust, "...find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this Ordinance impractical, that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Ordinance, and that such modification: (a) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection, and maintainability intended by this Ordinance, based upon sound engineering judgment; and (b) Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; and (c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and (d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and (e) Will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity." Meets objectives and safety, function: The proposed road cross-section meets the minimum standards by providing two (2) lanes of traffic, fire access, and sidewalks. In the case of Field Place NE, both sides shall be completely developed. NE 7 h Street and Graham Avenue NE will be designed and install sidewalk, curb, and gutter on the development side. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 95057 MThis oaoer contains 50 % recvded material. 30 % post consvrner RENTON AHF.AI3 OFF THE CURVE James Jaeger, P.E. January 8, 2007 Page 2 of 2 Not injurious or adversely im act adjacent properties. Adjacent properties are not injured nor adversely impacted as all dedications are from the proposed plat and allow future extensions and circulation as development occurs. In order to fit the minimum pavement width, minimizing the five-foot (5') landscaping buffer between the neighboring properties and the new road may be required. If so, a solid wood decorative fence is required to mitigate light and noise. Conforms to the intent of the code: The intent of providing for the City street network is met with the dedication and extension of Field Place NE, NE 7'h Street, and Graham Avenue NE. Connections and access for future development is provided for in this design. Justified and required for use and situation intended: The zoning of this parcel is R-8, Single Family. The modifications as requested allow the maximum density and number of lots that still meet the various setbacks and access criteria. The plat provides the minimum necessary for full use for access, emergency and domestic, as well as parking and pedestrian amenities. The Street Modification is approved with two (2) conditions: 1. "No Parking" signs shall be installed at any location where the pavement width is less than twenty-eight feet (28'). 2. In lieu of the buffering five feet (5') between this development and the neighbors, a solid wood decorative fence meeting City of Renton code requirements for height shall be constructed the full length of the tract prior to recording of the proposed plat. This decision to approve the proposed Street Modification is subject to a fourteen- (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m., January 23, 2007. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Examiner. Additional information regarding the. appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Sincerely, v WkV i Kayr Kittrick Development Engineering Supervisor Public Works Inspections & Permits cc: Neil Watts, Development Services Director Lawrence Rude, Fire Marshal Jill Ding, Senior Planner Land Use File Ij ¢ru4�� � �U�G� i RE�EIVEG BUILDING DIVISION / ` Q // Ile c U l7Z AA, 1 _' 7 JJ � R rr I S cJ 7`c3 lc.� ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE January 8, 2007. To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator 1. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: .Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Monday, January 8, 2007 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Honevbrook Circle Preliminary Plat (Dina) LUA06-143, PP, ECF The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. cc: K. Keolker, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, EDNSP Director J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner L. Rude, Fire Prevention J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney Y CITX )F RENTON A T- N Kathy Keolker, )Mayor December 22, 2006 Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting 33915 1"Way S 4200 Federal Way 98003 Subject: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat LUA06-143, PP, ECF Dear Mr. LaBrie: P lanning/B uil ding/Publ ic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is to inform you that the Hearing date for the Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat has been rescheduled from January 30, 2007 to February 6, 2007. The hearing will be held at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ill K. Ding Senior Planner cc: Estate of Sylvia Lefler/Gerald Lefler / Owner Marc Rousso ! Applicant Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 MThis ne=rcontains50°/ receded material. 30% oostuonsumer RENTON AHtAD OF THE CURVE y CITX )F RENTON R,+ ,,(7Kathy Keolker, Mayor December 1, 2006 Michael Fortson Department of Transportation Renton School District 1220 N 41h Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat LUA06-143, PP, ECF Planning/Building/PublieWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application for a 14-lot single-family subdivision located at 49XX NE 61h Street. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055 by December 15, 2006. Elementary School: -Middle School: High School: Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact oft a additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No Any Comments: Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, Jill K. Ding Senior Planner Encl. t) F7 C , 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 9 This paper contains 501% recycled material, 30 % post consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE �/ Kathy Keolker, Mayor December 19, 2006 Norm Lane 5000 NE 6`h Street Renton, WA 98059 CITY )F R.ENTON Planning/BuiidingfPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator RE: Honey Creek Circle Preliminary Plat Comment Letter (File No. LUA06-143, PP) Dear Mr. Lane: Thank you for your comment letter dated December 14, 2006 regarding this project. In your letter you request that the City require the construction of a fence along your west and north property lines. Your letter will be included in the official project file and your request will be considered by the decision maker. If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, e5111Jill K. Ding Senor Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 95057 0 This paperconiains 50% recycled material, 30 post censumer RENTON -1HEAU OF THE, CURVE. C9"r-1 5- / 9,141 "I ., ', (-44 (-� '?, ) I '�q Ik telk v c o- (7rC A-vJ' be I' �A7 tjd'�o c� RECEIVED DEC 14 2g06 8UkOlNGDlVjSjOj� A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS "It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single family lot to address these potential impacts." Parks Mitigation Fee City w, Renton Department of Planning / Building / P, v , Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (e_ _ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 1, 206 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-143, PP, ECF DATE CIRCULATED. DECEMBER 1, 2006 APPLICANT: Marc Rousso PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: Hone brook Circle Prelimina Plat PLAN REVIEW: Ameta Henninger SITE AREA: 108,972 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 49XX NE 61h Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77677 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:. The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Enyironmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel, located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreiine Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation utilities TranspWation Public Services Histonc/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Azp_��� 0_"t�e�-Xec/ B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to DroDeriv assess this Dr000sal. or Authorized Representative IZ % Date CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 11, 2006 TO: ]ill Ding FROM: Ameta Henninger 0 SUBJECT: HONEYBROOK CIRCLE PLAT LUA 06-143 600/700 BLOCK HOQUTAM AVE NE I have reviewed the application for this 14 lot plat generally located in the vicinity of Iloquiam Ave NE and NE 6th St in Section 10-23N-5E and have the following comments: Existing Conditions: • Water -- This site is not served by the City of Renton water. The site is located in the King County Water District 90 service area. A Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90 will be required_ • Sewer -- There is an existing 12" sanitary sewer in Hoquiann Ave NE to the south approximately at the intersection of Hoquiam Ave NE and NE 5th St. See City of Renton drawing number S2813, project name Windsong. There is an 8" sanitary sewer main under construction in the adjacent project on the south side. • Storm -- There are ,storm drainage facilities currently under construction in the adjacent project on the south side. • This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. CODE REQtiIREMENTS Water: • Water main improvements, including fire hydrants and domestic water services will be required within the existing and proposed streets in accordance with Water District # 90 and City of Renton standards. • The applicant shall verify with the District regarding all fees, permits, submittal and review of water main improvements plans. • Final design plans for water main improvements shall be approved by the District with concurrence from the City of Renton_ • Any new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM fire and shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure_ This distance is measured along a travel route. An additional fire hydrant may be required as a part of this project to meet this criterion. All fire Honeybrook Circle Plat Application Page 2 hydrants shall be per the City specifications. These City of Renton requirements are applicable to the entire proposed site regardless of water district boundaries. • The applicant and engineer shall field verify and show the location and distance of all existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site_ Sanitary Sewer. • This project will be required to extend an 8" main from the currently under construction main on the south side of the proposed development into the new plat to serve the new lots. • The applicant will be required to negotiate any necessary easements with the property owner. • Individual sidesewers will be required to be installed to serve the new lots. • Dual sidesewers are not allowed. • This property is located in the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). These fees are $316.80 per unit and are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. • System Development Charges of $1017 per each new lot are required. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit and prior to recording the plat. Storm Drainage: • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report shall be submitted with the preliminary plat application for this project. The conceptual drainage plan is to include detention and water quality treatment for the fully built out plat, including future houses, driveways and roadway improvements. The runoff from the new houses must be tight lined into the storm drainage system constructed for the preliminary plat. The drainage plan is to be designed per the 2005 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. This is a condition of the plat. • A storm drainage narrative was submitted with the formal application and is currently under review. The applicant needs to provide storm connections for the individual lots prior to recording the plat. The Surface Water System Development Charges of $759 per each new lot applies to the proposed project. The Development Charges are collected as part of the construction permit. Erosion Control Measures • Erosion control shall conform to the DOE Manual. Street Improvements: • This project will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way for a total build out width of 50' on NE 6th St. * The project will be required to install street improvements on NE 6th St for a total build out of 32' of paving, curb, gutter and sidewalks adjacent to curb. • The new streets interior to the plat must be developed to City standards, which are 42' right-of- way (if a modification request is submitted and approved), full 32' pavement width, with curbs, gutters, 5' sidewalks adjacent to curb and street lighting. The applicant does need to submit to • Homybrook Circle Plat Application Pagc 3 the City a street modification request for the reduction in the required right-of-way width to forty two feet. • Street lights will be required to be installed by this project on NE 6th St, and in the new plat. The street lighting system shall be designed and installed per City of Renton standards and specifications. Private (including PSE) street lighting systems are not allowed. • All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat. • Traffic Mitigation Fee of $10,048.50 is required to be paid prior to recording the plat. This is a condition of the plat. Fire mitigation and Parks mitigation fees must also be paid prior to recording of the plat. General: • All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the current City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards_ HONEYSROOKCARCI ROF City 'enton Department of Planning/ Building / P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1C _ _ eM_b_,' COMMENTS DUE: ❑ECEMBER 15, 2006 -- APPLICATION NO: LUA06-143, PP, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 1, 2006 APPLICANT: Marc Rousso u+ru PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding RECE iVED PROJECT TITLE: Hone brook Circle Preliminary Plat PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 108,972 square feet 6 BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 49XX NE 6" Street WORK ORDER NO: 77677 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More information Necessary Earth Air water Plants Land/Shoreiine Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Naturat Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housin Aesthetics Li hUGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistodclCutturaf Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addjtional information ip needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 0 Project Name: Project Address: LC- � ^ Contact Person: tiAA%z . Permit Number: Ui\ Project Description: T— Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: Residential 4ET- ITE Trip Generation Manual, .70 Edition ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Non -retail ❑ Other C%7hculatfon: Transportation --.Mitlgation fee: - 0 OW . (; Calculated fry L Date: J_ " City . 'enton Department of Planning / Building / PL,. ; Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:_ r ` COMMENTS DUE:- DEC g_1 5, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-143, PP, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: D APPLICANT: Marc Rousso PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: Hone brook Circle Preliminary Plat PLAN REVIEW: Ameta r SITE AREA: 108,972 square feet BUILDING AREA ros ISION LOCATION: 49XX NE 6" Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77677 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:, The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Emfironmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new intemal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources TAB s�\C-LT xr 751 _k' � ,_)/"/ B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services Historlc/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date /ti -Y �� FIRE DEPARTMENT C� �s ♦, # M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 4, 2006 TO: Jill Ding, Associate Planner FROM: James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat, 4900 Blk NE 6th MITIGATION ITEMS: 1. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single- family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to a minimum of 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Fire department access roads are required to be paved, 20 feet wide. 3. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:lercplat.doc City _ enton Department of Planning / Building / Pu_ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fi're COMMEMTS.DUE: DECEMBER 15, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-143, PP, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 1, 2006 APPLICANT: Marc Rousso PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: Hone brook Circle Preliminary Plat PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 108,972 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA -- - LOCATION: 49XX NE 6" Street WORK ORDER NO: 77677 1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The aoDlicant is reauestina Preliminary Plat aooroval and Environmental ISE _R+bvii Whbr the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8.(R-8) dwelling unit per adrL'zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the .project site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shore&ne Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS b C�t Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hUGlare Recreation Utilities Trans ation Public Services Histonc/Cufturaf Preservation AOport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14.000 Feet �A lNe ha a reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas here additional informal o is needed to properly assess this proposal. I /� Sivn�iture of Director or Authonz Re resentative Date City _ ...enton Department of Planning I Building / Pu. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 15, 20DS_. APPLICATION NO: LUA06-143, PR ECF DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 1, 2006 APPLICANT: Marc Rousso PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: Hone brook Circle Preliminary Plat PLAN REVIEW: Arneta Henninger Y Or HEN IUN SITE AREA: 108,972 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 49XX NE 6" Street I WORK ORDER NO: 77677 EC � � 20M SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is .requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environ jj W{� ry for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 (R-fIrtiFfre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in area from 4,500 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided via a new internal public street system, which would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health EnaTyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS IL16 IX14 Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li htlGlare Recreation Utilities Trans nation Public services HistonclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whey dditional information is needed tP properly assess this proposal. SigWure M Director Au rize6 Representative Date e NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: December'.. 2006 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA06-143. PP, ECF PROJECT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting preliminary Plat approval and Environmental )SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 108,972 square foot (2.5 acre) parcel located within the Residential - 8 jR�) dwePmg urnl per acre zoning designaflon. The proposed lots would range in area from 4, 500 square last to 5 014 square feet Access to the proposed lots would be provaed via a new internal public street system, which woula access off of NE 6th Street. No cri:iral areas have been iden[iGed on the project site. PROJECT LOCATION: 49XX NE 6s Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCF, MITIGATED {DNS -MI: As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton nas detefmined That significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43 21C. 110, the City of Renton is using the Cplional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed UNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. 7here will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Delennination of Non-Signficence- Mitigaled {DNS-Ml. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE. November 20, 2D06 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICAtill December 1, 2008 i APPLICANTfPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Ertc LaBrie, ESM Consulting Englneeral Teh. (21838-�113; Eml: eric.labrie@esmclvill PennitslRevlaw Requested: Environmental JEEPA) Rawl". Preliminary Plat approval Other Permits which may he required; BuIlding, Ptre, and Utility Construction Permit. Requested Studies: Drainage and Geotechnical Reports Location where application may be reviewed: PlanningfBulldinglPublic Works Department, Development Services Dlvlslon, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Ramon, WA 99065 PUBLIC HEARING. ll"h piing is tarls h I an a 007 fore en n n x m on Hearings begin of 9,00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZoningiLaad Use: The suhted site is designated Residential Single -Family LRSF) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential- 8 (R-5) on the City Zoning Map. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance. Development Guidelines and Regulations RMC 4-4-030; Drainage RMC 4-6-030 and other applicable codas and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures'. The following Mitigation Measures will likely tie imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as ailed above. • The aPPiidant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportapon Mitigation Fee; • The applicant w,11 be required to pay the appropnafe Fire Mifigelipn Fee, Tr,e applicant will he required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee: • Tha protect I2S be muuireC to eompiy wlm the Department of Ecology Sformwater Management Manua! for erosion and sedirnenl con!ro!. and • The project will be required iu comply wqq the 2005 Kiny County Surface Warer Oeslyo Manua'. Cemmen;8 on the above application must be submitted In writing to JIII Ding, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, III South Grady Way, Renton, WA 88055. by S:go PM on D lsernher1S,i2006. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on January 30, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Council Ehaimbers Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton: If you are interested in attending the hearing. please contact the Development Services Dltrl9ton to ensure that the haaring has not been rescheduled el (425) 430-7252. If comments cannot he submitted in writing by the'dsle irdicatad above, yoc may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or msh to he made a parry of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager_ Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner; Tel (425) 430-7219; Erttl: jding@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION if you would like to he made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project. complete this form and return to, City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So, Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Name/File No.: Honey Creek Circle Preliminary PlatlLLIA06-143, PP, ECF NAME' MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CERTIFICATION hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted b me in conspicuous laces or nearby the described property on �w•�`\'`��������� p Y p P Y P p y ,. ?�r�` DATE: 12 -l W Cfo SIGNED: ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing it; 'y J _ t4� y rf2-�_��� ,L on the day of �j"�►� N ARY PIJ LIC SIGN JY',F •�A� till«\\\\\� CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 1 st day of December, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Ltr, NOA, Environmental Checklist & PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Eric LaBrie Contact Marc Rousso Applicant Estate of Sylvia Lefler/Gerald Lefler Owners (Signature of Sender)_ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) " SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act f%Ps %M%%q d purposes mentioned in the instrument. . V Dated: oT A 'Notary F5ublic in an or the Sate-�)f ltAshingtgn M' Notary (Print): My appointment expires: fit/ ttt.taM1+VA 1, Project Name: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat Project Number: LUA06-143, PP, ECF template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) pt. of Ecology ' WDFW - Stewart Reinbold " Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept [EnvironmentalReview Section c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 160'h Ave SE 39015 - 172"d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers ' KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 City of Kent KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn Mr, Fred Satterstrow, AICP i 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dov. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 980_09-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 160th Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an `Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork template - affidavit of service by mailing 664950023005 ABADZIC BESIM 12125 140TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 086970059001 BLUEBERRY PLACE 2010 156TH AVE NE #100 BELLEVUE WA 98007 086970039003 CHENG JAMES C 560 ELMA PL NE #39 RENTON WA 98059 102305920807 FEELER GERALD S+KENWORTHY L 14110 SE 124TH ST RENTON WA 98059 102305922001 GARDNER EDDIE & MARIE 707 HOQUTAM AVE NE RENTON WA 98059 086970043005 GREEN JOSEPH & JUDY 4834 NE 5TH CT RENTON WA 98033 527470005002 HYDE DONALD J 14005 SE 121ST ST RENTON WA 98059 102305922308 KOSHAK JAMES W 12125 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 102305933800 LEFLER GERALD 5006 NE 6TH ST RENTON WA 98059 102305926606 1023059lG403 BARDON ROBERT L BELL PAMELA M 10520 148TH AVE SE 14026 5E 122ND RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 102305918108 527470004500 BOETCHER DANIEL J CARIVEAU DUANE H 12202 140TH AVE SE 14009 SE 121ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 086970042007 08697004S000 REDO MOLLY T EY CARMEN M 580 ELMA PL NE 4822 NE 5TH CT RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 102305914909 086970041009 FURBER PHYLLIS L GARCIA BARBARA A 12215 142ND AVE SE 576 ELMA PL NE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 086970051008 086970049002 GEBHARDT CHARLES L+CATHRYN GERSTNER H LYNN 4811 NE 5TH CT 4823 NE 5TH CT RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 102305915104 086970040001 GUSTIN WILLIAM+TIFFANY HOLMES LEE C 12204 142ND AVE SE 570 ELMA PL NE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 086970057005 JEANNERET CHANTELLE M 4105 32ND AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98126 102305939708 LANE NORMAN F 14106 SE 124TH ST RENTON WA 98059 102305916607 LINDEMUTH BRIAN 14034 5E 122ND ST RENTON WA 98059 & ROBIN 102305939401 JOHNSON KENNETH E 14035 SE 122ND ST RENTON WA 98059 102305938502 LANGLEY DEVELOPMENT GROUP 1 6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD STE #106 SEATTLE WA 98188 102305924205 LOUIS ANDRE 14010 SE 122ND ST RENTON WA 98059 102305921706 102305918504 527470003502 MARTIN LEAH L+SCOTT L MATTHAI DELORES MAYES ROY R 16247 205TH PL SE PO BOX 562 14027 E 121ST RENTON WA 98059 BLACK DIAMOND WA 98010 RENTON WA 98055 102305918207 102305925004 086970044003 METIVIER PAUL A+KRISTIN L G MIERA MICHAEL MITCHELL JANEAN L 14049 SE 121ST ST 14042 SE 122ND ST 4828 NE 5TH CT RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 102305922209 102305933909 102305905501 MOORE MONTE D+KAREN L OLIY IVAN N+YULIYA V PRATHER PATRICIA 12226 142ND AVE SE 12251 142ND AVE SE 12231 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 102305919700 527470004005 664950022007 DRUMMER FRANCIS J RAMER VERA RANDALL NORMA J 12227 142ND AVE SE 14019 SE 121ST 622 NILE RD RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 NACHES WA 98937 102305932109 102305921300 086970050000 SHEAR VERNON W SHEARER HEATHER SIEBEN MARJORIE L 12203 142ND SE 14057 SE 121ST ST 4817 NE 5TH CT RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 102305937702 102305909107 086970047006 SMITH MARK A+STACEY L SMITH MELISSA SZEMAN STEPHEN J 14114 SE 124TH ST 12223 142ND AVE SE 4814 NE 5TH CT RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 086970048004 086970038005 102305918306 SZWED GRZEGORZ A TIFFANY LAURIE D WEG LLC 4810 NE 5TH CT 556 ELMA PL NE PO BOX 2701 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON wa 98059 RENTON WA 98056 086970046008 102305937108 YANSURA MARY E ZERBY MR AND MRS 4818 NE 5TH CT 12208 142ND AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS- M) DATE: December 1, 2006 i LAND OSE NUMBER: LU�06-143, PP, ECF PROJECT NAME: i Holteybrook Cirde Prelirninartl l Iat PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The epp ftnt is regte PagrMaty Plet approval end rvaironrnenfal (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an e� M square foot (2;5 ;IWW 40 oated within t �sidentiai - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zoning designaW. `the pfepi�sed tots wiauldlraVein area from 4,600 square feet to 5,014 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be provided vie a new intamal public street system, which Would access off of NE 6th Street. No critical areas have been identified on the project site, PROJECT LOCATION: 49XX NE Wh Street OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, M1TI[3A-TrzD-(DN3-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental iMmacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110, the City of Fenton is using the Optional DNS-M process to Give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Commeet VW00s**W project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated iirtto a single comment period. There will be no come, the issuance of the Threshold Determinatioq of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS•M). A 14-day fiAllaw the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: i I NGve"ftr 20, 2006 N9TII*',OF COMPLETE APPLICATIo�: � December 1, 2006 i A]61131-1 iAN77PAOJECT CONTACT PEA Sq'N: Eric Lal3rie, ESM C ut El @ita �+11'3.; Emil: eric.labrie@.s `lv1I.. to PermftslReview Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project. Development Regulations Used For Project Mftlgation: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Pretfi'nlna Building, Fire, and Utlffty GanstrueVon R Drainage and Geotechniaal Reports PlanningBuildingtPubUc Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Public hParing is tr ntaTryely.scheduled for January 30, 20017 before the Renton HeMng Exam'13pL in ftpWn Council Qhambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the Ah floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. Thp subject site is designated Residential Single -Family ( F) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Rehsidential - 8 R-8) on the City's Zoning Map. . Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Development Guidelines and Regulations RMC 4-4-030; Drainage RMC 4-6-030 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. *ry l I Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. • The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee; ■ The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee; ■ The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee; ■ The project will be required to comply with the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for erosion and sediment control; and ■ The project will be required to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design, iVe�ual. Cbmultints on the above application mpst be submitted In writing to Jill Dirot, Senior P ariner, Development Servic" Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by: 00 Plo on D*Penrber 16, 2006. this matter Is also tentatively scheduled for a publ)c hearing on January 30, 2ti�b , aft 9i0 AK'ICouncil evi r. nth Floor, Renton City Nall, 1055 South Grady Way,' Renton. If you are intere ted in attending the h an g, please contact the Development Swvlces Division_ to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425 4 0-T282. if comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing a. resent your comments on the proposed befmre the Hearing Examider. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and revive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Ark o wft submits written comments will automatically beowne a. party of record and will be notified of any decision on this' pro eet. CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner; Tel (425) 430-7219; EMI: Jding tt ci.renton.wa.us SUE THE 1'"FiOJEIT NIJMl3ER WHEN CALLING FOR -PROPER R MAT10N SITE If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Nerve/File No_: Honey Creek Circle Preliminary Piat/LUA06-143, PP, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CIT T OF RENTON + R)") Kathy Keolker, Mayor 7 December 1, 2006 Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting 33915 1"Way S #200 Federal Way 98003 Subject: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat LUA06-143, PP, ECF Dear Mr. LaBrie: PlanningBuilding/PubHcWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on January 8, 2007. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application_ In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on January 30, 2007 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jill K. Ding Senior Planner cc: Estate of Sylvia Lefler/Gerald Lefler / Owner Marc Rousso / Applicant 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 12% Tk;. -...,., i� r..nw_.e,..,_ ., .. qml .,.,mot.-.,--, RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE CIT"" ' OF RENTON Y, + ,� + ,, )Kathy Keolker, Mayor December 1, 2006 Michael Fortson Department of Transportation Renton School District 1220 N 41h Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject; Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat LUA06-143, PP, ECF PlanningBuildingftblicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application for a 14-lot single-family subdivision located at 49XX NE 6rh Street. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055 by December 15, 2006. Elementary School: Middle School: High School: Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No Any Comments: Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, Jill K. Ding Senior Planner Encl. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30 % post consumer RENTQN AHEAD OF THE CURVE City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT DEv� i°� ov fkEwot4 MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Estate of Sylvia Lefler 1 Leslie R. Kenworthy ADDRESS: 14110 SE 124th St. CITY: Renton ZIP:98059 TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Marc Rousso COMPANY (if applicable): Seattle Redevelopment, LLC ADDRESS: PO Sox 2566 CITY: Renton ZIP:98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-226-9100 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Eric LaBrie COMPANY (if applicable): ESM Consulting Engineers ADDRESS: 33915 1st Way S. Ste #200 CITY: Federal Way ZIP:98003 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 253-838- 6113 eric.labrie@esmeivil.com Nov 2 p 20 ;tSCSIVED PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)lLOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 49XX NE 6`h St., Renton, WA 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 102305-9208 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant land PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single family residential EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Residential Single Family EXISTING ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 SITE AREA (in square feet): 108,972 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 31,006 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: None PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 7.82 unitslacre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 14 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 14 0:weblpwldevserviAirnrslpiannin@/mastcrapp.duc 1 1 P15106 PF ECT INFOR NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Approximately 3,000 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable). -N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A MA TION contd PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 10 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Preliminary Plat 3. 2. SEPA Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ 4 I AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I I, (Print Namels) {C• Ka,4 _'''4 _, declare that 1 am (please check one) t/ the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized rep esentative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that k'-) I " c, lz 6'�� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/he0their free and voluntary act forth uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of OwnerlRepresentative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q1%veb/pw/devserv/formsrplanning/ma,,terapp doc IV , , r;E n�0; ,`/ N� (,ngtn otary Public in and for he State of Was % % I AVB0' ~z� Il�O� f/� Notary (Print) f' I�`" tt--dI e Oev��l ' , a� 2 0 I006 s: My appointment expire'L' /� 1�('►� asceNN 2 11/15/06 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Estate of Sylvia Lefler 1 Debbie Kenworthy ADDRESS: 14110 SE 124t" St. CITY: Renton ZIP:98059 TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Marc RQUSSo COMPANY (if applicable): Seattle Redevelopment, LLC ADDRESS: PO BOX 2566 CITY: Renton ZIP:98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-226-9100 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Eric LaBrle COMPANY (if applicable): ESM Consulting Engineers ADDRESS: 33915 1 st Way S. Ste #200 CITY: Federal Way ZIP:98003 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 253-838- 6113 eric.labrie@esmcivil.com PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECTIADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 49XX NE 6"' St., Renton, WA 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 102305-9208 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant land PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single family residential EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Residential Single Family EXISTING ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 SITE AREA (in square feet): 108,972 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 31,006 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: None PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 7.82 units/acre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 14 1N1 P�`NN NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNI1 0 r pO 141e): 14 011 Q Q web/pw/devserv/formsiplanning/muSLerapp.doc 0q, n 5/or, PROECT INFORMAT NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Approximately 3,000 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable):NIA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A ION conU rd PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): CI AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO g FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. a GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 10 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Preliminary Plat 3, 2, SEPA 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 1 I, (Print Name/s) �� E� � C�•.,declare that I am (p ) ✓ the current owner of the property i�cyY'7�i�-,���.V`slease check one involved in this application or the authorized repre ntative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that P� t"f i.J 6� �/-� 06 a t�­ f' % signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislherltheir free and voluntary act f r he uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notai4 Public in ansYtor the State 4vashington (Signature of OwnedRepresentative) Notary (Print) rFLI�t G�[`{ Of O My appointment expires: Q:weblpw/devserv/forms/planninglr3iasterapp,dou 2 11/15/06 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Estate of Sylvia Lefler / Vicky L. Thompson ADDRESS: 14110 SE 1241" St. CITY: Renton ZIP:98059 TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Marc Rousso COMPANY (if applicable): Seattle Redevelopment, LLC ADDRESS: PO Box 2566 CITY: Renton ZIP:98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-226-9100 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Eric LaBrie COMPANY (if applicable): ESM Consulting Engineers ADDRESS: 339 1 5 1 st Way S. Ste #200 CITY: Federal Way ZIP:98003 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 253-838- 6113 eric.labrie@esmcivil.com PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 49XX NE 6" St., Renton, WA 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 102305-9208 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant land PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single family residential EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Residential Single Family EXISTING ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 SITE AREA (in square feet): 108,972 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 31,006 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: None PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 7.82 units/acre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if ap'�`�¢ n% Tp NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if ap le): " D NV s%W- Q: web/pm /devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.dac I I I/I 5/Ob PF ECT INFORMAT NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): Z SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Approximately 3,OQD sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A ION contil 4 PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. WETLANDS sq. ft. I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 10 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for- 1- Preliminary Plat 3. 2. SEPA 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ I AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I I, (Print Name/s) ,S� n declare that I am (please check one) ' the current owner of the property involved in this application or ' the authorized repr entative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/herltheir tL a and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument (Signature of wner/Representative) (Signature of OwnerlRepresentative) O tary Public in and f the State of W gton Z7 , a�p�A i i 5U Notary My appointment expires: Q: tveb/pw/devserv/fisrnis/plannisig/masterapp_doc 2 11/ 15/06 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Estate of Sylvia Lefler 1 Gerald Lefler ADDRESS: 14110 SE 124"' St. CITY: Renton ZIP:98059 TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) ti NAME: Marc Rousso COMPANY (if applicable): Seattle Redevelopment, LLC ADDRESS: PO Box 2566 CITY: Renton ZIP:98056 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-226-9100 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Eric LaBrie COMPANY (if applicable): ESM Consulting Engineers ADDRESS: 33915 1st Way S. Ste #200 CITY: Federal Way zIP:98003 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 253-838- 6113 eric.labrie@esmcivil.com PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 49XX NE 6" St., Renton, WA 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 102305-9208 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant land PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single family residential EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION, Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Residential Single Family EXISTING ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 SITE AREA (in square feet): 108,972 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 31,006 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: None PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 7,82 unitstacre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable);14 0 NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITSlffJ ipplica4l%A L. Q_ u eh/pw/devserv/forms/pl ann i n Y/niasterapp- doc !!0. - �� 1 1/ I5/06 PR ECTINFOF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Approximately 3,000 sf SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable):NIA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NIA MATION [conth d ,:U711x�r%1�U� IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descri tion on separate sheet with the following information included SITUATE IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 10 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Preliminary Plat 3. 2. SEPA 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namels) ( T' L s) /_ / Z !_ /- , declare that I am (please check one) ✓ the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that% - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hisJherltheir free and voiunta act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of OwnerlRepresentative) Q'cucb pu;!dcvserv/Formsiplanning/mastcrapp.doc Nota Public in and for the Stag of ashington Notary (Print) r My appointment expires: , 2 S1 t /06 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The west half of the south half of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 10, township 23 north, range 5 east, W.M., in King County, Washington; Together with an easement for road and utility purposes over and across the south 30 feet and the west 30 feet of the east half of the south half of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said section 10; Except any portion of said easement lying within County road. AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION --OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the %` day of _ F`1 .'. 'r /'; )�/ , 20 I installed I public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at &Z for the following project: : fit/ Protect name [/ Owner Name 2. 1 have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information }sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code. Installer Signature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this / day of20 0(1' . R:TW1DE VSERVIFonnsTianning`pubsign.doc 'NOTAIRY PUB in and the State of Washington, residing at C G / My commission expires on ��l �/zjp I DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF REWON 09/24NOV 2 0 2006 RECEIVED t� IP 4 . If f3 Nil t -,I fit It Re A an 1 "Ate. 77T, —11 -ks Al -ti 6GI iw 1; IWO 5- if 19 t It A It OL L �Ot. '41 It ;1 .1 _I:' TU *it kl" , 14, log if it v, "6 ------- 10 — — ---------- , 'e- 3 Ln Oil In Ji it oil XF k T4 F v!R f 49 vp Nov 21 06 08:48a JAGER ENGINEE,nING p.2 9419 S. 304 PLACE - KENT, WASH INGTON 98031 PHONE (2S3) 850-0934 FAX (253) 850-01.55 November 20, 2006 Kayren Kittrick City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 RE: Request for Modification for Reduced Right -of -Way Honeybrooke Circle Preliminary Plot Dear Kayren, The Honeybrooke Circle preliminary plat is a proposed 14 lot plat located north of NE 6th St, and between Feld Place NE and Graham Ave. NE. (if extended). It is located immediately north of the Honey Brooke West plat that is currently under construction. Access to the plat will be from NE 61h St. and then connecting to Hoquiam Ave_ NE. Per our previous meeting, Graham Ave. NE (east side of plat) and NE 7ft' St. (north side of plat) will be constructed to half road standards with a ROW width modified to match the Honey Brooke West extension. NE 61" St. will be primarily constructed by Honey Brooke West and completed by this proposed plat. Field Place NE will be the only infernal street within the plat. We are requesting that the City allow a reduced ROW width of 42'. This will allow the 32' of roadway pavement plus a 5' sidewalk on each side. The reduced ROW width is needed so that the plat can meet the minimum lot area requirements_ We are somewhat restricted for our roadway alignment because we must match the intersections that are being constructed by Honey Brooke West. The reduced ROW will allow the most efficient lot arrangement between Field Place NE and Graham Ave. NE, both of which have been established by Honey Brooke West. The reduced ROW width is also needed to obtain the maximum density for this plat, in the R-8 zone. Please review and grant our request for a modification for the reduced ROW. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 2mes Jae er, P.E.��'Q� ��. HONEYBROOKE CIRCLE PRELIMINARY PLAT CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DECRIPTION The Lefler preliminary plat is a 14 lot residential subdivision located on the north side of NE 6th St. It is anticipated that the construction of the plat will begin in the fall of 2007 and continue through the spring of the following year. The construction of the houses will likely begin in the summer and fall of 2007. The house construction will likely continue for approx. 1 year, depending upon the local demand for housing. The construction will occur from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday an possibly on Saturday. If work is to be outside of these hours, previous approval will be received from the City. The proposed hauling and construction traffic routes will be along 1-405 to the Sunset Ave. interchange. The traffic will then proceed east on Sunset Ave. and turn south on Hoquiam Ave NE. The traffic will then turn west on NE 61h St, to the plat. Construction that occurs during the dry summer period can produce dust. This will be controlled using water trucks. Impacts to traffic will be regulated by getting a traffic control plan approved by the City for work within the existing ROW. The tracking of dirt and mud will be reduced by constructing a quarry spall construction access point as one of the initial items of development. ^L s C�F�R t�ON 1N� 4. Nov 2 6 2606 RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: __ ` f Z 1_1 1 Q 5_ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1- Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: LEV ITOFNTNING CTY REON Nov 2 0 2006 RECEIVED HONEYBROOKE CIRCLE PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed Honeybrooke Circle plat is an application for a 14 lot single family residential subdivision situated on 1 existing lot with a total area of 2.50 acres. It is located on the north side of NE 61h St., between Field Pl. NE and Graham Ave. NE, when extended. The project is west of Hoquiam Ave. NE. This project will require preliminary plat approval and a SEPA determination by the City of Renton. The site is zoned R-8, residential. All of the lots will be detached single family residences. The surrounding properties are also similarly zoned, R-8. The site is currently vacant and used for horses. There is a stable & shed on the site. All of the existing structures will be removed. The existing access is from NE 6t►, St., which is a private road. NE 6th St. connects to Hoquiam Ave. NE. There are no sensitive areas on this site. The steepest slope is approx. 20% near the southwest corner of the property. The soils on the site are a silty, sandy, loam. The existing drainage sheet flows across the property to the southwest. The proposed use of the property as a 14 lot residential subdivision will be to provide new detached houses. The proposed lots will range in size from the minimum of 4500 SF to a maximum of 5014 SF. The density of the plat is 7.82 units per acre in the R-8 zone. Access to the new lots will be from new internal public streets that will be connected to the new streets that are being constructed as part of the Honey Brooke West Plat. This adjacent plat is south of the subject plat and will construct NE 61h St along the south boundary. They will also construct NE 6th St east to the connection with Hoquiam Ave. NE. The plat will construct half roads along the north and east boundaries. A full road will be constructed near the west side that lines up with the respective road in Honey Brooke West. The new full street is proposed to be ❑ 32' wide residential streets with a 42' right-of-way. The reduced ROW will be wide enough to accommodate the street and sidewalks on both sides. The reduced ROW width is needed to keep the net plat area at a maximum to keep under the maximum density. There are no proposed off -site improvements. A new water main and sewer main will be installed in the new plat streets. The water main will be looped through the site. The finished lots are estimated to be worth approx. $200,000 for a total value of approx. 2.8 million dollars. The value of the lots with preliminary approval only is estimated to be 2.1 million dollars. DEVFL_opPhENT PLANN4NG cwY OF RGNVO�"! gaV 2 0 2006 The site will require moderate grading for the proposed roads. The building pads for the lots will also require some minor benching. The main grading activity will be associated with the excavation for the detention vault and the portion of Field PI. NE at the southwest corner. The estimated amount of grading is 3000 CY. It is anticipated that the site will use some of the cut material on -site, but the majority will be exported off site. There are numerous trees on the site. There are approx. 165 trees on the site. About 38 of these will be saved. The trees vary is size and species. Land that will be dedicated to the City include the internal public roads and the drainage detention tract. The lots will be sold by the developer to one or several builders or investors. The applicant will not construct the houses. The future builders will likely use model homes and temporary job trailers. DEVELOpMENrf pLANNING CITY OF REWOM NOY 2 o 2006 RECEIVED AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the _ S— day of Y� , 20 �2�, I installed I public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at CIT �u j r zjLe AYF for the following project: CtL Project name 6 � (d- ),-.e /' (I ,-- Owner Name 2. 1 have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirnents of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code. Q Installer Signature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this P day of iJW(W , 20 O(P . NOTARY PUB in a residing at My commission expires on the State of Washington, NX R,\PWIDEVSERV\Forms\Planninglpubsign.doc 09/24/03 DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax. 425430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1 U(6Q 7 Z square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets" Private access easements" Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: I oC) square feet D square feet O square feet 2. 3 l onU square feet 3. -1-7 qb(,o square feet- 4. ( , i � acres 5. ` ` - units lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. .7 r '�)Z - = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. pM��� pQNiN� OV- Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. I0 TO �pV COMER Q:%'WTB1PW1DEV5ERVTorms%Planningldensity.doc Last updated: 11/082004 1 ICITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: December 1, 2005 TO: Pre -Application File No. 05-157 FROM: Keri Weaver, Senior Planner x7382 SUBJECT: Lefler/Johnson Preliminary Plat General: We have completed a review of the pro -application for the above -referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Heating Examiner, Zoning Administrator, and City Council), Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code, The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall_ Project Proposal: The subject site consists of 2 adjacent parcels located on the western side of 142"d Ave SE (Haquiam Ave NE), south of S. 122"d Street. Parcel A ("Johnson Property") is approximately 3.88 acres in size, and Parcel B ("Lefler Propert)") is approximately 2.50 acres in size. An existing house is located on Parcel A, which will be removed. A demolition permit will be required for removal of the existing house. The proposal is to subdivide the 2 parcels totaling 6.38 acres into 35 lots, with 2 tracts for stormwater detention. The subject property is currently located In unincorporated King County, within the City's potantlal Hoquiam Annexation Area. It is anticipated that the annexation, if approved, will not be effective earlier than March or April 2046. The zoning that is proposed on the subject site once annexed into the City Is Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (111•113). No land use applications will be accepted until the annexation Is effective. consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The proposed development would be located within the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation. The following proposed policies are applicable to the proposal: Land Use Elem_ en_t Objective LU-FF: Encourage re -investment and rehabilitation of existing hou , cgfid development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: [�6 Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets, Z 'd �HO'IN Ad50:Z 900Z H ,2nV Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8,0 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in -fill parcels of less than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) In single-family designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to 4,500 square feet on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide flexibilRy in subdivisionlpfat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range. Policy LU-149. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Policy LU-134. Required setbacks should exclude public or private legal access areas, established through or to a lot, and parking areas. Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities. Policy LU•154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and inflll project designs incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and quality of life for existing residents. Cpmunity Design Element Policy C113•12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. Policy CO.13. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and/or responding to more urban setbacks, freight or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. Policy CD-14. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with other structures on the site and with adjacent development. Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria: Where there are differences In height (e.g., new two -store development adjacent to single -story structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the structure. Garages, whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of development established In the vlcinity. Structures should have entries, windows, and doors located to maintain privacy In neighboring yards and buildings. Zoning/Density Requirements: The proposed zoning for the subject property is the Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-6) zoning designation. The density range required in V ,aC, the R-8 zone Is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The method of calculating net density Is as follows: M90:� 90H 'H Inv A calculation of the number of housing units and/or lots that would be allowed on a property after critical areas and public rights -of -way and legally recorded private access easements are subtracted from the gross area (gross area minus streets and critical areas multiplied by allowable housing units per acre). Required critical area buffers and public and private alleys shall not be subtracted from gross acres for the purpose of net density calculations. The applicant indlcates that the net density of the proposed project will be 7.49 du/acre, consistent with the R-8 density requirements. A density calculation was not submitted with the development plan. The density calculation must be submitted with the formal land use application, and address any public rights -of -way, access easements, and/or critical areas that would be subtracted from the gross density. All square footage* of areas to be deducted from the gross density must be provided at the time of formal land use application. Development Standards: Development Standards: The R-8 zone permits one residential structuretunit per lot. Detached accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 sq ft each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size. Minimum Lot Size. Width and Deoth — The minlmum lot size permitted in the R-8 is 4,500 square feet for lots greater than 1 acre in size and 5,000 square feet for lots 1 acre or less in size. A minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for comer lots, as well as a minimum lot depth of 65 feet, is also required. As proposed, the new lots appear to comply with the minlmum lot width, depth and size requirements. Buildina Standards -, The R-8 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size. Lots under 5,000 square feet in size are permitted a maximum building coverage of 50% of the lot area. Building height is restricted to 30 feet and 2-stories. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet and one-story or can be up to 30 feet and 2 stories if the use of the structure is animal husbandry related. The gross floor area must be less than that of the primary structure. Accessory structures are also Included in building lot coverage calculations, The proposal's compliance wlth the building standards will be verified at the time of building permit review. Setbacks — Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line and any private access easement, The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 15 feet in front for the primary structure and 20 feet in front for the attached garage, 20 feet in the rear, 5 feet on interior side yards, and 15 feet on side yards along streets (including access easements) for the primary structure and 20 feet on side yards along streets (including access easements) for the attached garage. The proposed lots appear to have the ability to meet minimum setback standards. Landscaping and Open Space, A 5 foot wide irrigated or drought resistant landscape strip is the minimum amount of landscaping necessary for a site abutting a non -arterial public street. Tree requirements for short plats Include at least two trees of a City approved species with a minimum caliper of 1 1/2 inches per tree must be planted in the front yard or planting strip of every lot prior to building occupancy. A 5-foot landscaped strip must be Installed along the frontages of SE 122np Street, NE 6" Street, and interior plat roads. Five copies of a conceptual landscape plan rpp�t::'{...5''' requirements In RMC 4-8-120D must be submitted at the time of formal laridl u'�s application. ti FLOA ti a EN 'IN € C190:� 400� U lnv Driveway Grades; The maximum driveway slopes can not exceed fifteen percent (15%), provided that driveways exceeding eight percent (8%) are to provide slotted drains at the lower end of the driveway. If the grade exceeds 15%, a variance from the Board of Adjustment is required. Sensitive Areas (Habitat): Based on the City's current Landlnfo maps, the site appears to be largely forested, which may be indicative of the presence of habitattwildlife. A habitat data report will be required to determine what wildlife Is present and could be impacted by the proposed plat. Sensitive Areas (steep Slopes): Based on the City's current t.andinfo maps, it appears that regulated slopes (15%-25%) may be present on the west side of the subject property. A geotechnical analysis is required to be submitted with the formal land use application. Environmental Review: The project would require SEPA review due to the number of lots of the proposed plat (greater than four dwelling units). The proposal would be brought to the Environmental Review Committee for review as it is their charge to make threshold determinations for environmental checklists. Typically, mitigation of impacts is accomplished through fees related to Issues such as transportation, fire and parks as well as measures to reduce impacts to environmental elements such as soils, streams, water, etc. Permit Requirements, The project would require Preliminary Plat and Environmental (SEPA) Review. The review of these applications would be processed concurrently within an estimated time frame of 12 to 16 weeks. After the required notification period, the Environmental Review Committee would issue a Threshold Determination for the project When the required two -week appeal period is completed, the project would go before the Hearing Examiner for a recommendation to the City Council on the Preliminary Plat. The Hearing Examinees recommendation would be subject to two -week appeal periods. The application fee is $2,000 for the Preliminary Plat and % of full fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) which is dependent on project value. less than $100,000 is $200 (112 of $400.00 full fee) and project value over $100,000 is a $500.00 fee (112 of $1000.00 full fee) plus first class postage per mailing label required for notification to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the site. Estimated fees for the land use applications would be $2,500.00 plus postage. The applicant will be required to install a public information sign on the property. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal requirements is provided in the attached handouts. once Preliminary Plat approval is obtained, the applicant must complete the required improvements and dedications, as well as satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before submitting for Final Plat review. The Final Plat process also requires City Council approval. Once final approval is received, the plat may be recorded. The newly created lots may only be sold after the plat has been recorded. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat. A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.0Q per each new, avers ni t ;fir P g daily trip attributable to the project; and, �� ti �` " } ; ii o" s • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $466.00 per nM single family lot; and,, 5 'd SHO 'IN N INd40:� 900� '�7I V = A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530,76 per new single family residence. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is included in the packet for your review. Additional Comments: In advance of submitting the full application package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring In one copy of each application material for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensure that the application is complete prior to making all copies. m. Jennifer Henning 9 d Uzo'IN Nidto: Z 900Z EZ Ind L r_a a �o D6 - 3 rn 118th SE 121A St. b RM-F -CA CA } ZONING L 'd---MHO 'IN RSA $ VI SE 1 h Pi. R 8 1 1 F6-15T23NMRu2 — — — — M*ob WF UMAP SE 113th SE 117th SE 124th a� i:►6,`. 10 T23N R5E E 112 --�--' i dto:Z —90H ��c� •any Renton Renton City Limits Parcels Wetlands Naz Wetlands Landslide Hazard Areas erate IFIED Aq ifer Protection Zones Zone I Z one 2 Erosion Hazard Areas Flood Hazard Areas Selismit. Hazard Areas L 2 Regula led Slopes 15 < -25 25 4= 40 Regulated 40 <= 90 Regulated M> 90 Regulated Zoning Resource Conversation idential 1 du/ac Residential 4 dulat ;Residential 8 dufac SCALE 1 '2,870 2DO o 4700 400 600 FEET N A C)A htt0frentonneR Wednesda�djo:� bqOOZ E-27VFAM CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE_ November 23, 2005 TO; Ked Weaver FROM: Ameta Henninger X7298 SUBJECT: LEFLER PREAP 05-157 VICINITY OF HOQUTAM AV NE & NE 6TH ST NOTE ON PRELDWiARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAYNED IN THIS REPORT: The fallowing comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre - application submittals wade to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Searing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant.. I have reviewed the preliminary application for this proposed 35 lot plat generally located In Section 10-23N-5E and have the following comments: WATER: • This site is not served by the City of Renton water. The proposed subdivision is within the water service area of King County Water district No. 90 (KCWD # 90). The applicant small contact KCWD #90 and obtain a certificate of water availability before any development of the property. (KCWD #9 - th St- Ren on, WA 98059-4540- ph: 425-255-9600). Water main improvements, including fire hydrants and domestic water services will be required within the existing and proposed streets in accordance with Water District It 90 and City of Renton standards. e The applicant shall verify with the District regarding all fees. permits, submittal and review of water main improvements plans. • Final design plans for water main improvements shall be approved by the District with concurrence from the City of Renton. A Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90 will be required to be subrtrik� with the formal application. 25S 6 'rl EEzo 'ON WdCo:Z 900z 'H '2nv I-Mtit vial rraaPV+iyauvii Page 2 All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1.000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along a travel route_ Additional fire hydrants will be required as a part of this project to meet these criteria. All fire hydrants shall be per the City specifications. These City of Renton requirements are applicable to the entire proposed site regardless of water district boundaries_ Lateral spacing of fire hydrants shall be predicated on hydrants being located at street intersections. SEWER: • Once the Honey Brooke West project Is constructed then this proposed plat needs to extend an 9° sanitary sewer -main from the Honey Brooke West project to the north and to the east along the full frontage of the parcels being developed. The project shall also install an 8' sewer main in both of the north south streets_ • Individual sidesewers will be required to be installed to serve the new lots. Dual sidesewers are not allowed. • This property is located in the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). These fees are $224.52 plus interest per unit and are collected at the time a construction permit Is issued. • System Development Charges (SDC) are $900 per new lot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to the recording of the plat. Sce— Mk STREET IMPROVEMENTS• • This project will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way for the extension of NE 6th St. The project will be required to install half street improvements on NE 6th 5t with 35' of right-of-way and 28' of paving abutting the proposed plat. If the Honey Brook West project is developed first then this proposal shall develop the remaining of the street improvements. • The new streets interior to the plat must be developed to City standards, which are 42' right-of-way (if a modification request is submitted and approved), full 32' pavement width, with curbs, gutters, 5' sidewalks adjacent to curly and street lighting. The applicant does need to submit to the City a street modification request for the reduction in the required right -of way width to forty two feet. • Street lights will be required to be installed by this project on NE 6th St, Hoquiam Ave.' t7t5 NE and in the new plat. The street lighting system shall be designed and installed per City of Renton standards and specifications. Private (including PSE) street lightinggo systems are not allowed. (li E10 'QN W o Z 9006 '�Z ",.IV LCI ICI r-Mt r I R<t1l1�llll:d11U11 Page 3 All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works Inspector prior to recordin lat. The Traffic Mitigation Fee of approximate $750 p new lot shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. STORM DRAINAGE: • A conceptual drainage plan and drainage report shall be submitted with the preliminary plat appfication for this project. The conceptual drainage plan Is to include detention and water quality treatment for the fully built out plat, Including future houses, driveways and roadway improvements. The runoff from the new houses must be tightlined into the storm drainage system constructed for the preliminary plat. The drainage plan is to be designed per the 2005 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual There do not appear to be any s rm drat ge facilities in this area. The Surface Water SOC fees f $715 p new lot are required it be pal These fees are collected at the time a con uction rmit is issued. FtOSIOPT CO R\4e� OL MEASURES • Erosion control shall conform to the DOE Manual. GENERAL: All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. All projects are required to be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton current horizontal and vertical control network. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these Improvement is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100.000 but less than $200,000. and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. LEFLERPLPA z D FIRE DEPARTMENT ♦1 M E M U R A N D U M DATE: November 21, 2005 TO: Ked Weaver, Senior Planner FROM: James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT; Lefler preliminary Plat, NE 66 and oquiam Ave NE Firc Department Comments: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single- family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within. 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. 3. Fire department access roadways require a minimum 20-foot wide paved roadway. 4. An building addresses shall be visible from a public street, Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:Viat2.doc l.[ H70 'Oh', Inv •-OFIGl via% r I VappiMduon Page 2 All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. This distance 1s measured along a travel route. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure_ This distance is measured along a travel route. Additional fire hydrants will be required as a part of this project to meet these criteria. All fire hydrants shall be per the City specifications. These City of Renton requirements are applicable to the entire proposed site regardless of water district boundaries, + Lateral spacing of fire hydrants shall be predicated on hydrants being located at street Intersections. SEWER; + Once the Honey Brooke West project is constructed then this proposed plat needs to extend an 8' sanitary sewer main from the Honey Brooke West project to the north and to the east along the full frontage of the parcels being developed. The project shal also install an 8° sewer main in both of the north south streets, rq + individual sidesewers will be required to be Installed to serve the new lots. + Dual sidesewers are not allowed. tt � of + This property is located in the Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). These fees are $224.62 plus interest per unit and are collected at the time a construction permit Is Issued. • System Development Charges (SDC) are $900 per new lot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to the recording of the plat. STREET fMPROVENgM. ; 6th St. • The project will be required to install half street improvements on NE 6th St with 35' of right-of-way and 28' of paving abutting the proposed plat. If the Honey Brook West project is developed first then this proposal shall develop the remaining of the street improvements. + The new streets interior to the plat must be developed to City standards, which are 42' right-of-way (if a modification request is submitted and approved), full 32' pavement width, with curbs, gutters, 5' sidewalks adjacent to curb and street lighting. The applicant does need to submit to the City a street modification request for the reduction in the required right-of-way width to forty two feet. Street lights will be required to be installed by this project on NE 6th St, Hoquiam Ave NE and in the new plat. The street lighting system shall be designed and installed per City of Renton standards and specifications. Private (including PSE) street lighting systems are not allowed.` �I 'd �Ho 'ON N90:6 900z U Inv ka-ze "bl IV 6 -- X f 0 150 300 1 :1800 Teelmical Samces PNmfng1BuudjnslFralle Wainawe Minted ApHl t I UZO 'IN —C 00 / �3 4� ,20C-S )f16 0 EXHIBIT C loll * 4�3,f- 4-1 102305-9394 L r x" fT Wharton Sewer Uhei'orri'er. er - kr"d � . File No. LA-04-001 DV I ko. WO 900Z U any CITY OF RENTON AWN FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL LATECOMER DISTRICT WHARTON LATECOMER Typo: Wastewater Utility Improvements Total Cost: Aswsment Di ict PRM 27 — 0027; Collectia Line: Total Cost: $42,257.20 Total Front Footage: 484 Cost Per FF $87.31 Property Name/Addross of Tax Payer of Record � Front Footage Identification _ . --. CIYY OF R#NTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE $42,257.20 Front Footage Assessment Parcel #1 IMNSON KE1,NETH E 2S7 $22,439.22 14035 SE 122ND ST RENTON WA 98059 KC Tax Act # 102305-9394 Legal Description: PARCEL 2 KCSP 417114 REC AF #7804120892 SD PLAT DAF - N 1/2 OF SW 114 OF NW 1/4 OF SH 1/4 LESS NLY 90 FT O(: SLY 170 FT OF WLY 130 FT OF FLY I60 FT & LESS SLY 129.39 FT OF NLY 15938 FT OF W 130 FT OF ELY 160 FT Developer's Property KC Tax Act # Legal Description: BOETCHER DANIEL JOHN 12202 140TH AV S8 RENTON WA 98059 102305-9216 77 $6,722.74 POR O1+ S V2 OF NW 114 OF NW 1/4 OR SE 1/4 LY S OF &c BETW SIDE INS OF LOT 4 BLK 2 MCCLAINS ADD PROD SLY LESS S 30 FT THOF Developer's Property BOETCHER DANIEL 7 75 $6,548.12 12202 i 40TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 KC Tax Act # 102305-9181 Legal Description: POR S 1/2 OF NW 114 OF NW 114 OF SE 1/4 LY S OF & BTW E & W LNS OF LOT 2 BLK 2 MCCLAIN ADD LESS CO RD Developer's Property PRICE LEOLA F 75 $6,548.12 14010 SE 122ND ST RENTON WA 99059 KC Tax Act # 102305-9242 Legal Description: POR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LY SLY OF LOT 3 BLK 2 MCCLAIN ADD & BETW SIDE LNS OF SD LOT PROD S LESS CO RD P:%curroor Projcatsll'endingLaWomtn%WhanonWINALTMAL ussmni roil.doe Page I of I 5l 'd HN 'IN 1Nd6o: Z 400Z 'E� '2nV System DtXdopment Charges T01e Type of Land Use Water Fee Amount Wastewater Fee Surface Water Fee Amount Amount Single family residence and $1,956.00 per $1,017,00 per $759.00 per mobilatmanufactured homes dwelling unit dwelling unit dwelling unit Multi-family(in 0 zones $1,174.00 per $610.00 per dwelling $0.265 per square except CD and COR zones) dwelling unit unit (auxiliary foot of new (auxiliary buildings buildings like club impervious like club houses are houses are considered surfacing, but not considered inclusive inclusive to the less than $759.00 to the development development and are and are not counted not counted as a as a dwelling unit and dwelling unit and are are thus not included thus not included in in the calculation of the calculation of the the fee) fee Mixed Use (in all zones Mixed use buildings Mixed use buildings $0.265 per square except CD and CAR zones) with over 50% floor with over 50% floor foot of new space used for space used for impervious surface, residential shall be residential shall be but not less than assessed at the rate of assessed at the rate of $759.00 $1,174.00 per $610.00 per dwelling dwelling unit unit CD and COP, zones $0.273 per gross $0.142 per gross $0.265 per square square foot of square foot of foot of new property, but not less property, but not less impervious surface, than $1,956.00 than $1,017.00 but not less than $759.00 All other uses $0.273 per gross $0.142 per gross $0265 per square square foot of square foot of foot of new property, but not less property, but not less impervious surface, than $1,956.00 than $1,017.00 but not less than $759.00 00Gtirii r cAdowments and settings%isittbideMocat s8ciingsltemplmxlibdirldoel.doo 91 Id EHO'IN M60:� 90H "E� 'sPy King County DDES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 98055-1219 This certifica avides the Seattle King County Depawoent of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals_ King County Certificate of Water Availability Do not write in this box number name ❑ Building Permit 0 Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or other Applicant's name: Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Contact: Matt Cyr (253-838-6113) ESM Consulting Proposed use: Single Family Residences -- 14 Lots Location: 49XX NE 6th Street, Renton, WA 98059 - Parcel #102305-9208 (Lefler Property) (attach map and legal description if necessary) 1. ❑ a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing —(size) water main that is fronting the site. OR I] b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: 0 (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or DE Agreement and all related Easements required. ❑ (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or o (3) Other (describe): Latecomers fee will apply on NE 6th to HoneyBrooke West. Will also have to replace 329" of main on Hoquaim. ThQ water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. King County DDES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 98055-1219 This certifica wides the Seattle King County Depa, ,t , ent of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. King County Certificate of Water Availability Do not write in this box number name ❑ Building Permit 121 Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or other Applicant's name: Seattle Redevelopment LLC, Contact: Matt Cyr (253-838-6113) ESM Consulting Proposed use: Single Family Residences — 14 Lots Location: 49XX NE 6tn Street, Renton, WA 98059 - Parcel #102305-9208 (Lefler Property) (attach map and legal description if necessary) ❑ a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing_(size) water main that is fronting the site. OR 0 b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: 0 (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or DE Agreement and all related Easements required. ❑ (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or CI (3) Other (describe): Latecomers fee will apply on NE Wh to Honeyerooke West. Will also have to replace 329" of main on Hoquaim. 2. El a. The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval). 3. 0 a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. I] a. Water will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 300 feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of flow at Peak Demand Duration ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ less than 1 hour ❑ 500 to 999 gpm ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours 0 1000 gpm or more El 2 hours or more ❑ flow test of gpm ❑ other ❑ calculation of gpm (Note: Commercial building permits which includes multifamily structures require flow test or OR calculation.) P� N0 ❑ b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. 5. El a. Water system has certificates of water right or water right claims sufficient to provide service. OR *0 ❑ b. Watersystem does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims.�oc"D Comments/conditions: Fire flow rate is after new mains are installed. Fees per lot: GFC @ $3,200, 3/4" MLter Drop @ $500.00, WAC @ $125. FEES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for lyear from date of signature. KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT #90 LESTER PIELE RENEWAL FEES: W/ IN 1 YEAR $50.00 Agency name Signatory name AFTER 1 YEAR $125.00 SUPERINTENDENT�X'� 8/14/06 Title /Agij;ig�n2ture Date Z:\Water Availability CertiGcateslWater Availability\Seattle Redevelopment - Lefler(14 lus).dUc DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply.' IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read W;4i19G as 'proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. @ � � �oN 11Esm81engr%ESM-JOBS11241100810051document\EC-001.doc11/07106 4. 5 [1 7 r;3 BACKGROUND Name of proposed project; if applicable: Honeybrook Circle Preliminary Plat Name of applicant: Seattle Redevelopment, LLC Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners: Estate of Sylvia Lefler / Gerald Lefler 14110 SE 124�h Street Renton, WA 98059 Applicant: Seattle Redevelopment, LLC Attn: Marc Rousso PO Box 2566 Renton, WA 98056 (425) 226-9100 Agent: ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Attn: Matthew Cyr/Eric S. Pennala, AICP 33915 1st Way S., Ste 200 Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 838-6113 Date checklist prepared: November 7, 2006 Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services Division Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Checklist Review: 3 months Land Use Review/Hearing: 3-6 months Engineering Review/Permitting: 4 months Plat Construction: 4 months Home construction is expected to begin in the spring of 2008 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. - Level 1 Downstream Analysis prepared by Jaeger Engineering, dated Sept 12, 2006. ���� plAk -Leftler Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report by Chad Armour LLC, dated Aug ke ` P � 2006. I\Esm8\engr\ES M-JOM 1241100810051document%EC-003 .doc Q� I p j CeX�V -Geotechnical Engineering Study by Earth Solutions NW, dated January 11, 2006 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. None are known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. - SEPA Review - Preliminary/Final Plat Review - Engineering Review - Right-of-way Use Permits from the City of Renton - Developer's Extension Permit from King Co. Water Dist. #90 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This project is proposing to develop an existing parcel into 14 single-family detached lots. The site is approximately 2.5 acres and is zoned R-8. The proposed lot sizes will range between 4,500 and 5,015 square fees~ The proposal includes plans for a single storm drainage facility to comply with the City`s storm drainage requirements. The developer will pay a fee in -lieu of providing the recreation requirements to the City. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. if a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist The project is within a portion of the Southwest % Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, of the Willamette Meridian. The site address is: 14110 SE 124", Street King County Parcel No. 102305-9208. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS G�=Uai101 a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other-__------- b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Approximately 9 percent. C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils onsite consist of alderwood gravelly sandy loam series (AgB an o VANru a soils according to the King County Soil Survey. c` O vo 11Esm81engr\ESM-JOBS11241100810051document\EC-001.doc Recst, � d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site location. See Geotechnical Engineering Study by Earth Solutions NW for more information. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be limited to the construction of the proposed roads, lots, water, sewer, other utilities, and the proposed detention facility. There will be approximately 500 cubic yards of fill, and 1,500 cubic yard of cut within this project The excess material will be transported off -site to an approved receiving location that has not yet been determined. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during clearing and grading operations associated with this project. To minimize the impacts of the project, appropriate erosion control measures will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction activity associated with this project g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The preliminary plat shows that approximately 65 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During construction, various measures are expected to be used to control erosion. These methods include construction during the dry season, the use of silt fences and hay bales, sedimentation ponds, interceptor trenches, controlled construction access, and re -vegetation of disturbed areas. Specific temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, short-term emissions may occur, including dust and vehicle emissions from construction related equipment After construction, emissions from this project would primarily result from automobile usage as is typical with residential development 11Esm81engrlESM-JOBs11241 TM0051documerttlEG-001.doc WED 3. b. Are there any off -site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None to our knowledge. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust emissions will be controlled during site construction by the use of best management practices, including periodic watering of disturbed areas. The project will not rely upon wood burning fireplaces as the primary source of heat for the new homes. All new homes will use natural gas and/or electricity to provide heat, reducing emissions caused by wood burning fires. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No, there are no wetlands or streams present on the site. Please see the critical areas reconnaissance report by Chad Armour, LLC for more information. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. 11Esm81engr\ESM-JOBS11241100M051documentlEC-001.doc ° � b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc,). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1} Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, if so, describe. The proposed project will provide approximately 1,100 linear feet of new roads, 14 new rooftops and other impervious surfaces which will generate new stormwater runoff. The increased runoff from these surfaces will be collected via catch basins and routed in underground pipes to a new stormwater detention facility. The new homes will either connect their downspouts to the storm drainage system in the street, or connect to the pond through a private drainage easement The drainage pond will discharge into the existing public drainage system within NE 6th SL approximately 250 ft west of the site. This eventually flows to the south and into Blueberry Plafs drainage system. Please see Drainage Report and Conceptual Drainage Plan prepared by Jaeger Engineering for more detailed information. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials are generally limited to petroleum products from the road surfaces. The water quality portion of the stormwater facilities is specifically designed to prohibit these materials from entering the downstream system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All development and engineering requirements imposed by the City to control the impacts to the hydrology of the area will be performed by the proponent. These include design of the stormwater facilities pursuant to the adopted KCSWDM, using the conservation flow control criteria. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _xx_ deciduous tree: alder, mapleaspen, other _xx_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, fruit _xx_ shrubs _xx_ grass � �4yro i � T ____ pasture TO \\Esm8%engrlESM-JOBS112411008=5ldocumentlEC-001.doc P+ j� 1 � vte� ii --- crop or grain ___- wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other - other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The majority of the existing vegetation will be removed for the grading and construction of the project. The project will attempt to retain as many significant trees as reasonably possible in areas near the rear of future lots and around the perimeter of the site. This project will meet the appropriate City requirements with respect to tree retention and/or mitigation. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The project will attempt to incorporate native plants wherever possible on the site. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no threatened or endangered animal species known to be on or near the site at this time. C. Is the site part of a migration route? if so, explain City of Renton, as well as the rest of western Washington, is in the migration path (Pacific Flyway) of a wide variety of neo-tropical songbirds, waterfowl and other species of birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time; however, rodents and small animals will undoubtedly inhabit the stormwater tracts and buffers within this project 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for }�L heatingmanufacturing, etc. .� lips 11Esm81engr\ES1V1-J08S11241100810051document\EC-001.doc {W� a r � li Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to meet the proje&s energy needs for light and heat. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction of the new homes will meet or exceed the necessary energy requirements of the Northwest Energy Code and those adopted by the City. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on existing roads would be audible. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noises will likely occur on a short-term basis due to the use of heavy equipment nailing guns and saws. This noise would be limited to typical construction hours and the City's noise ordinance. On a long-term basis, noise would be limited to typical residential uses, including cars and children. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Increased noise levels due to construction will be restricted to the abovementioned hours to reduce any impacts to the neighboring residents. _�pON 1j, 11Esm81engr1E5M-JOB51124110081 Wdocument\EC-001.doc �EINIED 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant except for a barn. The uses of adjacent properties include single and multi -family development. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge C. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing barn on the site. d, Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, the existing barn will be demolished to make way for the new development. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning is single family residential, R-8 (8 units per net 8 acre). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation of the site is residential single family (RS) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on a household occupancy rate of 2.5 people per single-family residence, we expect that approximately 35 people will reside in the finished project j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. ON 1� c ti yr,�1' Ctt� \\Esm8lengr\ESM-JOBS11241100810051document\EC-001.doc E'� Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed 14-lot subdivision is consistent with development in the area, current zoning, and comprehensive plan designations and will be consistent with the Renton Municipal Code. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. it is expected that the project will provide 14 new single-family residential units in the middle income level. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One barn. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed. The City's zoning code restricts the building heights of single-family residential structures to 30' Exterior materials will typically consist of wood or wood like siding with brick, rock, or shingle accents. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light would occur during evening and night time hours and would be limited to street lights, house lights, and minimal security fighting within the park space. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light from the finished project would not cause hazards. Exterior lighting would be typical of a residential neighborhood W�-W�fps4 OF F, 11Esm81engr%ES M-J0BS11241 100810091documentlEC-001.doc C. What existing off -site sources of fight or glare may affect your proposal? The primary off -site source of fight would be from vehicles traveling along roads in the vicinity. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control fight and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The area has both parks and schools in the vicinity. The nearest park in the area is Kiwanis Park The two schools in the immediate vicinity are Hazen High School and Honey Dew Alternative School. These facilities provide recreation space such as trails, play grounds, sports fields and basketball courts. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? if so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The project is proposing to pay the City's Parks Mitigation fee to enhance current City recreational facilities. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known to exist at this time. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: It is unlikely that significant archaeological or historic evidence or artifacts remain on the site. However, in the event that such evidence is found during site development, construction would cease in that area and the items would be inventoried by a qualified archaeologist in accordance with State regulations. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any 1�EsmBlengrlESWJOBS11241100810051documentlEC-001.doc describe proposed The proposed subdivision will be accessed from 124`h Avenue SE. Highway access to 1-405 will be via NE 4rh St which connects to 124th Avenue SE (Please see Preliminary Plat for proposed access points). b. Is site currently served by public transit? if not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest public bus access is on NE 4th St and Duvall Ave. NE (bus route 908). This bus stop is approximately 0.13 miles south of the proposed subdivision. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Assuming a minimum of 4 parking spaces per household (2-car garage and a 2- car driveway), there will be at least 5E parking spaces provided upon completion of this development No parking spaces will be eliminated by the project. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Approximately 1,100 linear feet of new roads are proposed. All proposed roads within the project will be public roads and some will be half roads or completion of existing half roads. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oO water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. According to the institute of Traffic Engineers Manual, 7th Edition, there will be an average of 10 vehicular trips per day, per household For the entire project of 14 new lots, that would amount to approximately 140 average daily trips. Peak volume would most likely occur during the typical rush hour times of 4:00 - 6:00 PM and would add approximately 14 PM peak hour trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The applicant will be responsible for appropriate traffic mitigation fees, which will offset some of the impacts of the subdivision. Other mitigation includes the construction of access and frontage improvements and new roads to serve the project 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. There would be a minimal increased need for fire and police protection due to an additional 14 lots in the area. Also, there will be a minimal impact o .� �'p} present school system. )4N V Or 11Esm81engrlESM-J08S11241100810051document\EC-D01.doc b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Property taxes, building permits, and development impact fees resulting from home construction in the subdivision are expected to mitigate impacts incurred from this development 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse sendce, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other cable television b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity. Gas: Water: Refuse: Telephone: Sewer: Cable: C. SIGNATURE Puget Sound Energy Puget Sound Energy King County Water Dist #90 Waste Management Qwest Communications City of Renton Comcast I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaratio non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part Proponent: ______---------- Name Printed: ----_----a ---`_` ----_--- - -------- Date: ---- �� �Q_ -- 11Esm81engr%ESM-J QBS11241100810051documentlEC-001.doc true n of any 10 2. 3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented, Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Haw would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: �M1�sal ��o�i1NG t- 1 mm I � 11113 %\Esm8%engrlESM-J08S11241100810051documentlEC-001.doc ,A�1115D 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part Proponent: ---------------------------------- Name Printed: ____-____-________________________ Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 \%Esm8lengrlESM-JOBS11241100810051documentlEC-001.doc I R ,JAF ER ENGINEEF'NG 9419 S. 204 PLACE - KENT, WASHING.�N 98031 PHONE (253) 850-0934 FAX (253) 850-0155 November 9, 2006 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT PLAT OF HONEYBROOK CIRCLE 14 LOTS 14102 SE 124`h ST. NE 6T" ST. @ FIELD PL. SE PREPARED FOR: f V• Jaymarc Development Marc Rousso P.O. Box 2566 y Renton, WA. 98056 Xnf (206) 948-8899 PREPARED BY: James J. Jaeger, P.E. 5 0 ��Ao NpV 2 4 TO ikscolleD I. OVERVIEW The proposed Honeybrooke Circle plat is an application for a 14 lot single family residential subdivision situated on 1 existing lot with a total area of 2.50 acres. It is located on the north side of NE 6th St., between Field Pl. NE and Graham Ave. NE, when extended. The project is west of Hoquiam Ave. NE. This project will require preliminary plat approval and a SEPA determination by the City of Renton. The site is zoned R-8, residential. All of the lots will be detached single family residences. The surrounding properties are also similarly zoned, R-8. The site is currently vacant and used for horses. There is a stable &4 shed on the site. All of the existing structures will be removed. The existing access is from NE 6th St., which is a private road. NE 6th St. connects to Hoquiam Ave. NE. There are no sensitive areas on this site. The steepest slope is approx. 20% near the southwest corner of the property. The soils on the site are a silty, sandy, loam. The existing drainage sheet flows across the property to the southwest. The proposed use of the property as a 14 lot residential subdivision will be to provide new detached houses. The proposed lots will range in size from the minimum of 4500 SF to a maximum of 5014 SF. The density of the plat is 7.82 units per acre in the R-8 zone. Access to the new lots will be from new internal public streets that will be connected to the new streets that are being constructed as part of the Honey Brooke West Plat. This adjacent plat is south of the subject plat and will construct NE 6th St along the south boundary. They will also construct NE 6th St east to the connection with Hoquiam Ave. NE_ The plat will construct half roads along the north and east boundaries. A full road will be constructed near the west side that lines up with the respective road in Honey Brooke West. The new full street is proposed to be a 32' wide residential streets with a 42' right-of-way. The reduced ROW will be wide enough to accommodate the street and sidewalks on both sides. The reduced ROW width is needed to keep the net plat area at a maximum to keep under the maximum density. There are no proposed off -site improvements. A new water main and sewer main will be installed in the new plat streets. The water main will be looped through the site. The finished lots are estimated to be worth approx. $200,000 for a total value of approx. 2.8 million dollars. The value of the lots with preliminary approval only is estimated to be 2.1 million dollars. The site will require moderate grading for the proposed roads... The vt�Lo� R MQ INN building pads for the lots will also require some minor benching. The bif'( NON 2 p 296 grading activity will be associated with the excavation for the detention vault and the portion of Field PI. NE at the southwest corner. The estimated amount of grading is 3000 CY. It is anticipated that the site will use some of the cut material on -site, but the majority will be exported off site. There are numerous trees on the site. There are approx. 165 trees on the site. About 38 of these will be saved. The trees vary is size and species. Land that will be dedicated to the City include the internal public roads and the drainage detention tract. OFVELOPMF-N-V PLANNING NOV 2 0 2506 ll. CORE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS 1. Discharge at Natural Location: The existing site currently sheet flows across the property to the southwest property corner. It accumulates in the southwest corner and runs to the west down a future road and into an existing drainage pipe that flows into Blueberry Lane. The proposed drainage system will collect the runoff into the vault and discharge it into a pipe that runs west along NE 6th St. This pipe will discharge into the same drainage pipe that currently collects the drainage. 2. Off -Site Analysis: An upstream and downstream drainage analysis has been performed and is detailed in section III of this report. 3. Runoff Control: This project is providing a 2005 Icing County level 2 standard flow control. This matches storm duration for the half 2 year through the 50 year storm event. It matches peak flows for the half 2 year event. The flow control will be accomplished using a detention vault with an orifice type flow restrictor. Additionally, the conservation flow control criteria is being applied to this project. This requires that the pre -developed site conditions be modeled as historic site conditions, or 100% forest. 4: Conveyance System: The project will provide conveyance piping for the street drainage and the lot roof downspouts. The piping will be sized to handle the 100 year developed storm event. 5. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan: An erosion control plan will be prepared and will be included with the engineering plans. This erosion control system will include silt fencing along the west, south and east property lines, a construction entrance, seeding & mulching and clearing limits. A sediment trap will be designed as part of the initial grading and development of the site. 6. Maintenance and Operation: The public road and alley will be dedicated to the City and maintained by the City. The private road, joint driveways and drainage vault will be maintained by the Homeowners Association.L:,F RUJNT ONti�G pro NOV 2 0 2006 RECE1VED 7. Bonds and Liability: The appropriate bonding and insurance forms will be secured prior to any construction on the site. SPECIAL DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS There are 12 special drainage requirements that may apply to any project. In this case, none of them apply to this project. Div On'? O� REWON lNG NOV 2 U 20 j;ECOVEL) PF%a- - t)F—',-4 �-I.o PE-0 DRh71 P-3 E I 7z st= 2 , Sa F-loi -,� erVIouy , �► ezf Z-, so � - Till) az� 3. RP orJFA-LL- P-� a.u-e0) P.-. FIB c� ,o? G� -57 0, I Z (o0 flEV ELOY OF R W O N4hkG NOV 2 4 a06 fJEC ED LEFLER PLAT PRE —DEVELOPED DAINAGE KCRTS PEAK FLOW STJ 44ARY Total Area: 2.50 acres Impervious surface: None - Conservation Flow Std. Pervious surface: 2.50 acres Till, forest Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:pre.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.158 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.043 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.117 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.004 8 3/24/04 20:00 0.069 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.121 3 1/18/06 21:00 0.102 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.202 1 1/09/08 9:00 Ccrriputed Peaks ---Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 0.202 1 i00.00 0.990 0.158 2 25.00 0.960 0.121 3 10.00 0.900 0.117 4 5.00 0.800 0.102 5 3.00 0.667 0.069 6 2.00 0.500 0.043 7 1.30 0.231 0.004 8 1.10 0.091 0.187 50.00 0.980 2 0 Q p L--OPc�D Q RA-i rcAj&E- �,Y�,z,p- . Use- -}-� e- use FQ Y-- CCRo u r,Ip c_Dv�... a� Lags I, 14 Z To�'a.1 sa wv e- f-�e� I'11 5 our-- - *at war (ofs I7,-T c�7 Q- 75—% rn ,ter v too s- CFex V-i n C.", . zo n tr, c_o 17.�(,75=Cep 3 �S� Lort��n Q(DUs Fe--,C\j lous 0 -z� 7-�3 -SF = c 38t12� .SF Z'iS7 D ( 7 ` 2-�53 aF z9 Le>� -�T 016`6 -)5 C- . LEFLER PLAT DEVELOPED DAINAGE KCRTS PEAK FLOW SUMMARY Total Area: 2.50 acres Impervious surface: 1.82 acres Pervious surface: 0.68 acres Till, grass Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates --- Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.502 6 2/09/Ol 2:00 0.420 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.601 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.466 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.558 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.534 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.678 2 10/26/06 0:00 1.00 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1.00 1 100.00 0.990 0.678 2 25.00 0.960 0.601 3 10.00 0.900 0.558 4 5.00 0.800 0.534 5 3.00 0.667 0.502 6 2.00 0.500 0.466 7 1.30 0.231 0.420 8 1.10 0.091 0.895 50.00 0.980 LEFLER PLAT DRAINAGE DETENTION VAULT RCRTS LEVEL 2 FLOW CONTROL SUMMARY WITH CONSERVATION FLOW STD. Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Facility Length: Facility Width: Facility Area: Effective Storage Depth: Stage 0 Elevation: Storage Volume: Riser Head: Riser Diameter: Namber of orifices: Detention Vault 90.00 ft 50.00 ft 4500. sq. ft 8.00 ft 432.00 ft 36000. cu. ft 8.00 ft 12.00 inches 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 0.74 0.042 2 5.80 1.60 0.103 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 432.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.01 432.01 45. 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.02 432.02 90. 0.002 0.002 0.00 0.03 432.03 135. 0.003 0.003 0.00 0.04 432.04 180. 0.004 0.003 0.00 0.05 432.05 225. 0.005 0.003 0.00 0.06 432.06 270. 0.006 0.004 0.00 0.20 432.20 900. 0.021 0.007 0.00 0.33 432.33 1485. 0.034 0.009 0.00 0.47 432.47 2115. 0.049 0.010 0.00 0.60 432.60 2700. 0.062 0.012 0.00 0.74 432.74 3330. 0.076 0.013 0.00 0.88 432.88 3960. 0.091 0.014 0.00 1.01 433.01 4545. 0.104 0.015 0.00 1.15 433.15 5175. 0.119 0.016 0.00 1.28 433.28 5760. 0.132 0.017 0.00 1.42 433.42 6390. 0.147 0.018 0.00 1.55 433.55 6975. 0.160 0.019 0.00 1.69 433.69 7605. 0.175 0.019 0.00 1.82 433.82 8190. 0.188 0.020 0.00 1.96 433.96 8820. 0.202 0.021 0.00 2.10 434.10 9450. 0.217 0.022 0.00 2.23 434.23 10035. 0.230 0.022 0.00 2.37 434.37 10665. 0.245 0.023 0.00 2.50 434.50 11250. 0.258 0.023 0.00 2.64 434.64 11880. 0.273 0.024 0.00 2.77 434.77 12465. 0.286 0.025 0.00 2.91 434.91 13095. 0.301 0.025 0.00 3.04 435.04 13680. 0.314 0.026 0.00 3.18 435.18 14310. 0.329 0.026 0.00 3.32 435.32 14940. 0.343 0.027 0.00 3.45 435.45 15525. 0.356 0.028 0.00 3.59 435.59 16155. 0.371 0.028 0.00 3.72 435.72 16740. 0.384 0.029 0.00 3.86 435.86 17370. 0.399 0.029 0.00 3.99 435.99 17955. 0.412 0.030 0.00 4.13 436.13 18585. 0.427 0.030 0.00 4.27 436.27 19215. 0.441 0.031 0.00 4.40 436.40 19800. 0.455 0.031 0.00 4.54 436.54 20430. 0.469 0.032 0.00 4.67 436.67 21015. 0.482 0.032 0.00 4.81 436.81 21645. 0.497 0.033 0.00 4.94 436.94 22230. 0.510 0.033 0.00 5.08 437.08 22860. 0.525 0.033 0.00 5.21 437.21 23445. 0.538 0.034 0.00 5.35 437.35 24075. 0.553 0.034 0.00 5.49 437.49 24705. 0.567 0.035 0.00 5.62 437.62 25290. 0.581 0.035 0.00 5.76 437.76 25920. 0.595 0.036 O.CO 5.80 437.80 26100. 0.599 0.036 0.00 5.82 437.82 26190. 0.601 0.036 0.00 5.83 437.83 26235. 0.602 0.038 0.00 5.85 437.85 26325. 0.604 0.041 0.00 5.87 437.87 26415. 0.606 0.044 0.00 5.88 437.88 26460. 0.607 0.049 0.00 5.90 437.90 26550. 0.610 0.055 0.00 5.92 437.92 26640. 0.612 0.060 0.00 5.93 437.93 26685. 0.613 0.062 0.00 6.07 438.07 27315. 0.627 0.073 0.00 6.20 438.20 27900. 0.640 0.081 0.00 6.34 438.34 28530. 0.655 0.C88 0.00 6.48 438.48 29160. 0.669 0.095 0.00 6.61 438.61 29745. C.683 0.101 0.00 6.75 438.75 30375. 0.697 0.106 0.00 6.88 438.88 30960. 0.711 0.111 0.00 7.02 439.02 31590. 0.725 0.116 0.00 7.15 439.15 32175. 0.739 0.121 0.00 7.29 439.29 32805. 0.753 0.125 0.00 7.42 439.42 33390. 0.767 0.129 0.00 7.56 439.56 34020_ 0.781 0.133 0.00 7.70 439.70 34650. 0.795 0.137 0.00 7.83 439.83 35235. 0.809 0.141 0.00 7.97 439.97 35865. 0.823 0.144 0.00 8.00 440.00 36000. 0.826 0.145 0.00 8.10 440.10 36450. 0.837 0.456 0.00 8.20 440.20 36900. 0.847 1.020 0.00 8.30 440.30 37350. 0.653 1.750 0.00 8.40 440.40 37800. 0.868 2.550 0.00 8.50 440.50 38250. 0.878 2.830 0.00 8.60 440.60 38700. 0.8B8 3.090 0.00 8.70 440.70 39150. 0.899 3.330 0.00 8.80 440.80 39600. 0.909 3.550 0.00 8.90 440.90 40050. 0.919 3.750 0.00 9.00 441.00 40500. 0.930 3.950 0.00 9.10 441.10 40950. 0.940 4.140 0.00 9.20 441.20 41400. 0.950 4.320 0.00 9.30 441.30 41850. 0.961 4.490 0.00 9.40 441.40 42300. 0.971 4.650 0.00 9.50 441.50 42750. 0.981 4.810 0.00 9.60 441.60 43200. 0.992 4.970 0.00 9.70 441.70 43650. 1.002 5.110 0.00 9.80 441.80 44100. 1.012 5.260 0.00 9.90 441.90 44550. 1.023 5.400 0.00 Hyd Tnflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 1.00 ******* 0.44 8.10 440.10 36434. 0.836 2 0.50 0.16 0.14 7.95 439.95 35783. 0.821 3 0.60 ******* 0.13 7.31 439.31 32911. 0.756 4 0.68 ******* 0.11 6.81 438.81 30659. 0.704 5 0.53 ******* 0.04 5.56 437.56 25021. 0.574 6 0.42 ******* 0.03 4.79 436.79 21561. 0.495 7 0.36 ******* 0.03 4.83 436.83 21746. 0.499 8 0.47 ******* 0.03 3.21 435.21 14445. 0.332 ---------------------------------- Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 1.00 CFS at Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.445 CFS at Peak Reservoir Stage: 8.10 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 440.10 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 36434. Cu-Ft 0.836 Ac-Ft Flow Duration Cutoff Count CFS 0.002 27646 0.006 6648 0_010 7151 0.014 5508 0.018 4947 0.022 4050 0.026 2244 0.030 1634 0.034 1037 0.038 256 0.042 16 0.046 7 0.050 4 0.054 6 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 10:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 from Time Series File:rdout.tst Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability o a � 45.085 45.085 54.915 0.549E+00 10.841 55.926 44.074 0.441E+00 11.662 67.588 32.412 0.324E+00 8.982 76.570 23.430 0.234E+00 8.068 84.638 15.362 0.154E+00 6.605 91.243 8.757 0.876E-01 3.659 94.902 5.098 0.510E-01 2.665 97.567 2.433 0.243E-01 1.691 99.258 0.742 0.742E-02 0.417 99.675 0.325 0.325E-02 0.026 99.702 0.298 0.298E-02 0.011 99.713 0.287 0.287E-02 0.007 99.720 0.280 0.280E-02 0.010 99.729 0.271 0.271E--02 0.058 6 0.010 0.062 7 0.011 0.066 17 0.028 0.070 14 0.023 0.074 11 0.018 0.078 5 0.008 0.083 6 0.010 0.087 6 0.010 0.091 10 0.016 0.095 5 0.008 0,099 7 0.011 0.103 10 0.016 0.107 8 0.013 0.111 9 0.015 0.115 8 0.013 0.119 8 0.013 0.123 6 0.010 0.127 8 0.013 0.231 2 0.003 0.135 3 0.005 0.139 4 0.007 0,143 4 0.007 Duration Comparison Anaylsis Base File: pre.tsf New File: rdout.tsf 99.739 99.750 99.778 99.801 99,819 99.827 99.837 99.847 99.863 99.871 99.883 99.899 99.912 99.927 99.940 99.953 99.962 99.976 99.979 99.984 99.990 99.997 Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS Cutoff 0.036 0.045 0:055 0.064 0.073 0.083 0.092 0.102 0.111 0.121 0.130 0.140 0.149 -----Fraction of Time----- BaseNew %Change 0.89E-02 0.42E-02 -52.6 0.61E-02 0.29E-02 -52.7 0.47E-02 0.27E-02 -42.8 0.36E-02 0.23E-02 -34.7 0.28E-02 0.18E-02 -34.9 0.21E-02 0.16E-02 -23.7 0.15E-02 0.13E-02 -9.0 0.95E-03 0.11E-02 13.8 0.57E-03 0.72E-03 25.7 0.33E-03 0.41E-03 25.0 0.21E-03 0.21E-03 0.0 0.16E-03 0.98E-04 -40.0 0.82E-04 0.00E+00 -100.0 0.261 0.261E-02 0.250 0.250E-02 0.222 0.222E-02 0.199 0.199E-02 0.181 0.181E-02 0.173 0.173E-02 0.163 0.163E-02 0.153 0.153E-02 0.137 0.137E-02 0.129 0.129E-02 0.117 0.117E-02 0.101 0.101E-02 0.088 0.881E-03 0.073 0.734E-03 0.060 0.603E-03 0.047 0.473E-03 0.038 0.375E-03 0.024 0.245E-03 0.021 0.212E-03 0.016 0.163E-03 0,010 0.978E-04 0.003 0.326E-04 ---------Check of Probability Base 0.89E-02 0.036 0.61E-02 0.045 0.47E-02 0.055 0.36E-02 0.064 0.28E-02 0.073 0.21E-02 0.083 0.15E-02 0.092 0.95E-03 0.102 0.57E-03 0.111 0.33E-03 0.121 0.21E-03 0.130 0.16E-03 0.140 0.82E-04 0.149 Maximum positive excursion = 0.005 cfs ( 4.5%) occurring at 0.113 cfs on the Base Data:pre.tsf and at 0.118 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Maximum negative excursion = 0.030 cfs (-45.50) occurring at 0.066 cfs on the Base Data:pre.tsf and at 0.036 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf Tolerance ------- NewChange 0.034 -4.8 0.035 -22.6 0.035 -35,3 0.036 -43.9 0.051 -30.9 0.067 -18.6 0.089 -3.5 0.105 3.0 0.116 4.1 0.125 3.2 0.131 0.9 0.135 -3.4 0.141 -5.1 v a N 7 O 10 -5 10 -4 rdout.dur pre.dur c�-R- p�1 -3 T r�i 2 1 Ian IpF �1 T f f Tl 10 10 10 v 1 Q TOO10 �ao Probability Exceedence I. we*- vaw 2-, 1?- = e ego ,1Y1p irV I o tj5 r4' ? 7q �= 4-1 = 0,47 (6.9 9o,zS(2,�be�j)) 0,47 (2 21, occ> T Use ;(/z 6� 4e_ c am„` ov, \)cw It C u 1re.c� ZST t � �P11NG �fi�rn� Prop =a Z5 Edo VII. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM The piping was sized to accommodate the 100 year developed flows as identified in this section of the report. The modified rational method was used as shown in the King County Drainage Manual. The pipes for this plat are a minimum 12" diameter and all will be corrugated polyethylene, double -walled pipe such as ADS-N12 or equal. The 100 year storm flow for the entire site was calculated. It was checked that each main pipe segment could handle the entire site's 100 year peak flow. CHAD ARMOUR, LLC August 14, 2006 Job Number 06-047 Mr. Marc Rousso J & M Land Development P. 0. Box 2566 Renton, Washington 98056 6500 126'" Avenue S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006-3941 (425) 641-9743 (425) 643-3499 (fax) chad(a7chadarmour.com Subject: Lefler Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report Parcel 102305-9208 Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Rousso: We are pleased to present the results of our critical areas reconnaissance for the above - referenced property (site) located in Renton, Washington. The work was accomplished in accordance with your verbal request. The purpose of the work is to assess the potential for wetlands or streams to be present on and near the site. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS There are no wetlands or streams present on the site. BACKGROUND INFORMATION We understand that you are considering purchasing this site. The site is composed of one parcel located at 14110 SE 124"' Street (Attachment A — Sketch Map). This 2.5 acre site is the location of a forest and barn. A horse once roamed the site. The King County iMap indicates that no wetlands or streams are present on or near the site. An unclassified stream is mapped about 325 feet southwest of the site. A Class 2 wetland is mapped about 650 feet south of the same. There is one soil type mapped on the site; Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. Alderwood soils are moderately well drained and have a weakly to strongly consolidated hardpan at a depth of 24 to 36 inches. They formed in glacial deposits on flat to steep slopes. In a representative profile, the surface layer is very dark brown (10YR 212) to dark brown (10YR 413) gravelly sandy loam. The B horizon is grayish brown (2.5Y 5/2) gravelly sandy loam. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam is not a listed hydric soil. EXISTING CONDITIONS We visited the site on August 11, 2006 to check for the presence of wetlands and streams on and adjacent to the site. Most of the site is dominated by mature Douglas -fir (Pseudotsuga menziesir) and big - leaf maple (Ater macrophyllum) trees. The understory vegetation is somewhat sparse do to the horse having access to the entire site. There were some Indian plum (Oemleda cerasiformis) and red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa) shrubs present at one C:IJ&M/LeflerfWetland Reconnalssance.doc Chad Armour, LLC ITY DEM110PIOF REN PLANNING NOV 2 0 2006 RECEIVED Wetland Reconnaissance J&M Land Development King County, Washington sampling location (Attachment B — Plot ID SP-1). Here sword fern (Polystichum munitum) and trailing blackberry (Rebus ursinus) are the understory dominants. These and other plant species are rooted in 21 inches of dark brown (10YR 3/3) gravelly sandy loam. We also assessed a low spot adjacent to the bam. This area is dominated by mature black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) trees in the overstory layer. Growing beneath the cottonwood canopy the dominants include Himalayan blackberry (Rebus discolor) and Indian plum. Also commonly present are stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and broad- leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius). These plant species are rooted in 7 inches of very dark brown (10YR 2/2) gravelly sandy loam over more than 8 inches of dark brown (10YR 3/3) gravelly sandy loam. The plat adjacent to the south was in the process of being cleared at the time of our site reconnaissance. All of the trees had been felled and bucked and most of the shrubs removed. The clump of on -site black cottonwood abuts this cleared area. We found no obvious topographic features that would suggest that the area dominated by the cottonwood trees was wetter than the rest of the surrounding area. CONCLUSIONS There are no wetlands or streams present on or within 300 feet of the Lefler site. LIMITATIONS Work for this project was performed, and this letter report prepared, in accordance with generally accepted professional practices for the nature and conditions of the work completed in the same or similar localities, at the time the work was performed. It is intended for the exclusive use of J & M Land Development and their assigns for specific application to the referenced property. This report is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. It should be noted that Chad Armour relied on information provided by others indicated previously. Chad Armour can only relay this information and cannot be responsible for its accuracy or completeness. Also note that delineating critical areas and assessing functions and values are inexact sciences. Biological professionals may disagree on the precise location of critical area boundaries, their functions, and classification. The final determination of these characteristics is the responsibility of the permitting authority, Accordingly, the critical area assessment and delineation performed for this study, as well as the conclusions drawn in this report, should be reviewed by the appropriate permitting authority prior to committing to detailed planning and design activities. C:/J&MILe(lerNJetland Reconnaissance.doc 2 F F � PLANNING Chad Armour, LLC F NOV 2 0 2006 RECEIVED Wetland Reconnaissance King County, Washington J&M Land Devel Any questions regarding our work and this report, the presentation of the information, and the interpretation of the data are welcome and should be referred to the undersigned. Sincerely, Chad Armour, av/. Chad Armour Principal LLC Attachment A — Sketch Map Attachment 8 — Data Forms CIJ&MlLeRerlWetland Recannaissance.doc Chad Armour, LLC DME'108P ENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 0 Zoos RECEIVED ATTACHMENT A Sketch Map DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 0 2006 RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 0 2006 RECEIVED ATTACHMENT B Data Forms DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Nov 2 Q zoos RECEIVED DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Deternination (1VA State Welland Delineation illanual or 1987 Corps lVetland Delineation rvianual) Pro}ccUSitu: L° Date: It{ Applicantlowncr; e'# j "J County: State: e!, „ Investi *ator(s): C._` ry }, �..r.,� S/f/R: 5r1 �- Do Formal Circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: is the site sigrtiFtcantlydisturbed (atypical situat.ion); yes Ttansoot ID; Is the area a potential Problem Arr:a? ties Plot ID., P Ex lanation of atypical or pmblrm area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S ; shrub; H = herb; V - vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum rye. cover Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum r cover Indicator T✓ ! e 0 . 1,E Y..: dq1 �' tli d..--' , I rA e- t.,, H:iD OPH7 IC. VEGETATION INDICATORS: �o of dorninants OBL, FACW, & FAC Check all indicators that apply & explain below: N p" ,z— Visual observatioO of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged; lnundatioti/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Techhical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophptic vegetation ptresenl. yes no' Rationale for decisioalRenwks: SJ HYDROLOGY Is h the growing season? yes no ! 'Water Marks: yes (n.� � Sediment Deposits: }c°s _ an 8asedon: it temp (record temp ) Drift Lines; yes tea) Drainage Patterns: to n ) other (explain) Dept: of inundation: inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: ye<�no) ,. Channels <12 in, es [Depth to free water in pit'. inches FAC Neutral: yes n Water -stained -Laves ye< r, Depth to saturated soil: I inches Check tt]] that apply &explain below: t Other (explain):; _ t , �:, r_ : 1 ` tt °�� „ ` � 9f Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial hotu ra hs: Other. ��r�- '� �� t •;. '7 Wetland hydrolop, present? yes f,'no Rationale for&6tt, on/Remarks ' DEVELOPMENT RLAsV�Ii; . CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 0 2006 RECEIVED I SOILS 1 r Map Unit Name 1 � '.t .b��1� A 1K,� (Series & Phase) A:.r Taxonomy (submun) L iji1G ) Drainabe Class Field observations confirrn (` Yc ,.i No mapped Profiile Description Qrpih Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle. abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) rl,oist) (match description) f f 1 fry' i�o 3 `— v J { Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Matrix ehroma s 2 With mottles Histic Epipedon Mg or Fe Concretions 5ulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer oMt dy Soils Aquic Yloisture Regime Org=ic Streakittg,in Sandy Soils Reducinc Conditions Listcd on .NfatidnaVLOcal Hydric Soils List Gleved or Low-Chroma (=i) ma►ttix ether (explairt in r,~marks) Hydric soils present? yes Rationale for decisionfRemarks: (�Eo) T��� 11} { vi e- `VetlandDetermination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soils present? yes o yes Is the sampling point yes Wetland hydrology resent? yes within a wc(land? Rationale/Remarks: D VELO M/97 ENT PLANNING CITY OF FIEN'TON NOV 2 o zoos RECEIVED DATA FOPM I (Repined) Routine lVetland Determination (11'A State Wetland Delineation XIanual or 1987 Corps 11'etland Delineation Manual Project/Site: _ 'e _ Data. Appiicant/owrtur: S 0' County: i t "- c Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site'? -' � no Community ID: Is the site signifid mi[y disturbed (aVpical situation)? yes of Transeet Its: (s the wea a potential Problem Arica? yes Plot ID: Fx lanation of atypical oc proble�m urea', VEt[;E'rATIO (For strata. indicale T = tree: S ;shrub: H — herb: V = vine) Dnntinaril Plarit Species Stratum % cow indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Vic. cover indicator 14 IIY)7ROPHYTIC 1'EGETATION INDICATORS: r'o of dorrtinants OBL, FACW, & FAC 15 .3 Cheek: all indicators that apply & explain Wow: /kJ 0,10 Visual observation of plant species growing, in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Weiland plant database: Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technitai Literature _ Other (e.Nlain} liydrophrtic vegetation present? Yes DO Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Is it tfze growing season? no Water Marks: yes ? Sediment Deposits: yes inn L on _ Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Line's: yes (t" Drainage Patterns: ycs � >� other (explain) Dept. of inundation; inches Oxidized Root (live Local Soil Survey: yes (no Channels <1.2 in. no es o Depth to tree water in pit: it(.hes FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves yes"i,o l Depth to saturatcd-sqil. tinches Check all that apple & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: � Aerial hoto ra bs: Other: Wettand hydrulrt�v present? }'es no Rationale for decision/Remarks DEVELOPMENT PLANT CITY OF RENTON 3R AM IING RECEIVED QI LS r Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (subgroup) Draina;e Classy Field observations confirms `YeNo mapped type'? �` �--� Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color ;`Mottle colors Maude abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Alunsell (Munsell size & contrast stn,cture, etc, profile moist) moist} (match descriotion) 42 Y .IJJ lJ H,}drfc Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) 0 4� Histosoi Matrix chroma <— 2 with mottles Histic Epipedon M; or Fe Concret.ioris Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface. Laycr of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Organic StreAing in Sandy Sails Reducing Conditions Listed on NationaI4,ocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1 matrix Other (ex lain in remarks Hydric soils present? yes no ` Ind � Sri � f..date Rationale for decisionlRemarks: •�,,, Wetland Determination (circle) Hydroph} tie vegetation presem? yes �u Hydric soils present? yes is the samplin point yes n Wetdand h ydroloa resent? yies na within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: Y, i._ ��+r ,a :. :. •, DEVERC iWNRANNISIG CITY OF RENTON Nov 2 0 Zoos DECEIVED Al ■ PREPARED FOR SEATTLE REDEVELOPMENT, LLC January 11, cot egJ+ Project Geolo� r F r` mond A. Coglas, P.E.�a8 ' Principal ��, � �- �ICl GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 14102 SOUTHEAST 124th STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON ES-0295 Earth Solutions NW, LLC 2881 —152nd Avenue Northeast, Redmond, Washington 980�52 o o tira� Ph:425-284-3300 Fax:425-284-2855 Toll Free: 866-336-8710 t�qv 2 0 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS ES-0295 PAGE INTRODUCTION........................................................................ 1 General................... ........................................................ 1 Project Description...... ..................... ................................ 2 Surface....................... . .. .................................................. 2 Subsurface........................................................................ 3 Groundwater.......................................................... ......... 4 CRITIAL AREAS ASESSMENT..................................................... 4 Landslide Hazard Assessment ............................................ 4 Erosion Hazard Assessment ............................................... 4 Seismic Hazard Assessment ............................................... 5 Coal Mine Hazard Assessment ............................................ 5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........... . . .......................... 5 General. ........................................................................... 5 Site Preparation and Eart_hwork............................................ 6 In -situ Soils............................................................. 6 Structural Fill Placement ............... ............................. 6 Excavations and Slopes ..................................................... 7 Utility Trench Backfill.......................................................... 7 Pavement Sections.............................................................. 7 Foundations................. ..................... ................................ 8 Foundation Setbacks ................................................. 9 Slab -on -Grade Floors......................................................... 9 RetainingWalls_.................................................................. 10 Drainage............................................................................ 10 Seismic Considerations.......................................................... 10 LIMITATIONS.............................................................................. 11 Additional Services............................................................ 11 fy �f y G � ` NTON �N� tjov 7 � 20 GRAPHICS PLATE 9 PLATE 2 PLATE 3 PLATE 4 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont'd ES-0295 VICINITY MAP TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL Field Exploration Test Pit Logs Laboratory Test Results Sieve Analysis Results DVIFR�NNINGCT OENO NOV 2 0 2006 RECEIVED January 11, 2006 ES-0295 Seattle Redevelopment, LLC c/o J & M Land Development P.O. Box 2566 Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Mr. Marc Rousso Dear Mr. Rousso: Earth Solutions: NWLK Earth Solutions NW LLC • Centechnical En0reerino • Construction Monitorirno • Environmental Sciences Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) is pleased to present this report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Residential Development, 14102 Southeast 124th Street, Renton, Washington". Based on the conditions encountered during our fieldwork, the site is underlain primarily by native soils consisting of loose to dense silty sand and silty sand with gravel, glacial till. Groundwater seepage was not encountered at the time of our fieldwork (December 2005). However, localized perched zones of groundwater seepage could be encountered during site grading operations, depending of the time of year and depth of excavations. Due to the presence of descending slopes along the western border of the site, we have included a landslide potential, seismic, erosion, and coalmine hazard assessment for the subject site, in accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-3-050 Critical Areas Regulations_ In our opinion, the proposed residential structures can be supported on competent native soils or structural fill used to modify existing site grades, as appropriate. We anticipate competent native soil capable of providing adequate foundation support will be encountered at depths of approximately two to three feet below existing site grade. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill, may be necessary. The opportunity to be of service to you is appreciated. if you have any questions regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call. Incerel EARTH rincipal , LLC Ii � "'_� Coglas, P.E. DEVELOPMENT nLANNING CITY OF RFNTON NOV 2 0 2006 2881 152nd Avenue NE • Redmond, WA 98052 0 (425) 284-3300 • FAX (425) 284-2855 0 Tall Free (866) 336-879tatVF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 14102 SOUTHEAST 124'h STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON ES-0295 INTRODUCTION General This geotechnical engineering study was prepared for the proposed residential development to be constructed at 14102 Southeast 124th Street in Renton, Washington. The purpose of this study was to excavate a series of test pits throughout the site, perform appropriate geotechnical analyses, and develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed development. Our scope of services for completing this geotechnical engineering study included the following: • A site geologic description including soil and groundwater conditions that may impact site development; • Recommendations for site grading, drainage, cut and fill slopes, structural fill requirements, erosion control, and recommended pavement sections; • Soil bearing capacity, subgrade preparation, and recommendations for foundation support; • Suitability of site soils for use as structural fill, and; • Additional geotechnical recommendations, as appropriate. The following documents were reviewed as part of preparing this Geotechnical Engineering Study: • Composite geologic map of the King Area, Booth, D.B., Cox, B.F., Troost, K.G. and Shine], S.A., University of Washington, Seattle Area Geologic Mapping Project, 2004, • King County Soil Survey, and; • City of Renton Municipal Code, Critical Areas Regulations, Chapter 4-3-050. DEVEI OPMEN'T PANNING CITY OF RE!* TON I Earth solutions NW, LLC NOV 2 U 2006 RECEIVED Seattle Redevelopment, LLC January 11, 2006 ES-0295 Page 2 Pro'ect Description We understand the site will be developed with a single-family residential subdivision and associated infrastructure improvements. Due to the topographic relief throughout the site, we anticipate a series of cuts and fills will be required at some locations to achieve design elevations. We anticipate the mass grading at this site will be relatively minimal and will largely use a balanced approach, with cut soils utilized elsewhere on -site as structural fill. We anticipate rockeries or modular block walls may be constructed at the site as part of the overall site grading activities. Site layout and grading plans were being developed at the time of our report. The proposed residential structures will likely consist of relatively lightly -loaded wood framing supported on conventional foundations. We anticipate the majority of the residential structures will incorporate crawl space and slab -on -grade garage floors. Based on our experience with similar developments, we anticipate wall loads on the order of 2 kips per lineal foot and slab -on - grade loading of 150 pounds per square foot (psf). Site drainage plans have not been completed at the time of this report. However, we anticipate stormwater generated from the site development will be contained on -site, and will be directed to a detention pond_ If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to verify that our geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated into the plans. Surface The site is located west of 142nd Avenue Southeast, at the western terminus of Southeast 124th Street in Renton, Washington. The approximate location of the subject property is illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Plate 1). The site is rectangular in shape with a gross area of approximately 2.5 acres. The approximate limits of the property are illustrated on the Test Pit Location Plan (Plate 2). The subject site is bordered to the north, south and east by single family residential parcels and to the west by an apartment complex. The property is developed with one barn in the central portion of the site. Earth Solutions NW, LLC REV OFRNN'NG CIV ENTO NOV 2 0 2006 ECE1\f GD •Seattle Redevelopment, LLC ES-0295 January 11, 2006 Page 3 The overall site topography gently slopes to the south and west with approximately twenty (20) feet of total elevation change. A landscape slope and rockery border the western site boundary, and descend to a pavement area associated with an existing apartment complex. The existing rockery heights are on the order or four feet, Based on our observations, the rockery and landscaping slope west of the site were likely constructed along native cuts associated with grading for the existing apartment complex. Vegetation throughout the site consists primarily of a mature forest with a mixture of both deciduous and fir trees with a relatively dense understory of brush and saplings. Subsurface Seven test pits were excavated throughout the subject site for purposes of assessing soil conditions, and for purposes of characterizing and classifying the site soils. Please refer to the test pit logs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. Topsoil was encountered at all of our test sites and ranged in depths between three to eight inches. Topsoil is not suitable for foundation or pavement support, and should not be mixed with soil to be used as structural fill. The topsoil can be considered for use in landscape or non- structural areas, if desired. The geotechnical engineer should observe stripping operations, and provide supplement recommendations for stripping depths, as appropriate. No areas of extensive fill were encountered during our fieldwork. However, due to the level of existing development, isolated areas of fill may be encountered throughout the site during the mass grading activities. Underlying the topsoil, we encountered native soils consisting primarily of medium dense to dense silty sand and silty sand with gravel (Unified Soil Classification SM). The soil relative density generally increased with depth. The geologic map of the area identifies glacially consolidated till soil (Qvt) throughout the site and surrounding areas. The till soils consist primarily of a non -sorted mixture of compact silt, sand and gravel. The King County Soil Survey (SCS) indicates the presence of Alderwood (AgB and AgC) series gravelly sandy loam throughout the site. The Alderwood series soils are characterized by a matrix of non -sorted silt, sand and gravel in a compact or dense condition at depth. The SCS describes Alderwood series soils as having slow to medium runoff with a slight to moderate erosion hazard. The soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork generally correlate with the geologic map designations and the SCS classification. Earth Solutions MN, LLC 0EVE1_0PMFN-f PLANNING CITY OF REgToh] Noll 2 0 2006 RECEIVED -Seattle Redevelopment, LLC January 11, 2006 ES-0295 Page 4 Groundwater Groundwater seepage was not encountered at the time of our fieldwork (December 15, 2005). However, the presence of groundwater seepage should be anticipated in the deeper site excavations. Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater flow rates are higher during the wetter, winter months. CRITICAL AREAS ASSESSMENT As part of our report preparation, we performed a critical area assessment in general accordance with the City of Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-3-O50. An ESNW representative reviewed the current sensitive area maps at the King County website based I -Map online GlS resource and Critical Areas maps maintained at the City of Renton City Hall. No critical areas were identified on the subject site or surrounding parcels. Based on the available resources reviewed by ESNW, the subject site is not currently mapped as a critical area. However, we have evaluated the site in terms of potential critical areas as detailed below. Landslide Hazard Assessment Based on our review of the I -Map online resource of King County, the subject site is not designated as a landslide hazard area. Based on the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork, and the limited topographic relief throughout the site, in our opinion the site would present a low landslide hazard. Erosion Hazard Assessment Based on our review of the I -Map online resource of King County, the subject site is not designated as an erosion hazard. In our opinion, based on the soil and topographic conditions, the proposed development areas of the site can generally be characterized as a low to moderate erosion hazard. However, Best Management Practices (BPM's) should be implemented during and after construction to minimize the potential for excessive erosion or instability. Exposed earth surfaces should be appropriately vegetated or mulched to reduce erosion during construction, and surface water runoff should be controlled. Final erosion control measures should consist of surface water controls and appropriate species of vegetation where exposed earth surfaces are present. Provided the recommendations detailed in this report are followed, in our opinion, the proposed development will not increase the erosion hazard on the property or on adjacent properties. Earth Solutions NW, LLC EV CITr OF RENT NTO�NIN Nov 2 0 2006 RECEIVED Seattle Redevelopment, LLC ,January 11, 2006 ES-0295 Page 5 Seismic Hazard Assessment Based on our review of the I -Map online resource of King County, the subject site is not designated as a seismic hazard. Based on the soil conditions observed during our fieldwork, we are in agreement with the King County Sensitive Area mapping of the site. In our opinion, based on the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork and the topographic setting at the site and surrounding properties, the site would present a low seismic hazard. Coal Mine Hazard Assessment Based on our review of the I -Map online resource of King County, the subject site is not designated as a coal mine hazard area. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, construction of the proposed residential development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The primary geotechnical considerations associated with the proposed development include site grading and earthwork, foundation support, structural fill placement, and the suitability of the on -site soils for use as structural fill. Based on the results of our study, the proposed residential structures can be supported on conventional spread and continuous foundations bearing on competent native soils or structural fill, as appropriate. We anticipate that competent native soil suitable for support of foundations will generally be exposed at depths of approximately two to four feet below existing grades. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill may be necessary. With respect to the existing landscaping slope and rockery located to the west of the property, it is our opinion the planned development will have a negligible impact on the existing rockery and slope. This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Seattle Redevelopment, LLC, and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. EVI~LOPM 1� C pLANNING CITY OF REWO0 1 Earth Solutions NW, LLC NOV 2 u 2006 RECEIVED Seattle Redevelopment, LLC January 11, 2006 ES-0295 Page 6 Site Preparation and Earthwork The primary geotechnical considerations during the proposed site preparation and earthwork activities will involve structural fill placement and compaction, and site drainage and erosion control. We anticipate the mass grading for the project will largely utilize a balanced approach, with cut soils used as structural fill elsewhere on -site. In -situ Soils From a geotechnical standpoint, the silty sand soils encountered at the test sites are generally suitable for use as structural fill. Due to the generally granular nature of the native soils, use of these soils throughout the structural fill areas of the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The moisture sensitivity of the native soils can be generally characterized as moderate to high. Because the native soils are moderately to highly sensitive to moisture, successful use of the on -site soils will largely be dictated by the moisture content of the soils at the time of placement and compaction. The soils encountered at the test sites were generally in a moist to wet condition at the time of the exploration (December 2005). Soils encountered during site excavations that are excessively over the optimum moisture content may require moisture conditioning prior to placement and compaction. Conversely, if the native soils are found to be dry at the time of placement, moisture conditioning through the application of water may be necessary prior to compacting the soil. If the on -site soils cannot be successfully compacted, the use of an imported soil may be necessary. Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a maximum aggregate grain size of four inches, and a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a fines content of 5 percent or less defined as the percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction. Structural Fill Placement In general, areas to receive structural fill should be sufficiently stripped of organic matter and other deleterious material. The geotechnical engineer should observe cleared and stripped areas of the site prior to structural fill placement. Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab -on -grade, and roadway areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should be compacted to a relative compaction of 90 percent, based on the maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D-1557-02) and placed in maximum twelve (12) inch lifts. In pavement areas, the upper twelve (12) inches of the structural fill should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent. Earth solutions NW, LLC uEVELOPMeN-r PLANNING ciTy OF REN-10N NOV 2 0 2006 RECEIVED Seattle Redevelopment, LLC January 11, 2006 ES-0295 Page 7 Excavations and Slopes The Federal and state Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHAMIISHA) classifies soils in terms of minimum safe slope inclinations. Based on the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork, the site soils encountered to depths of up to four feet would be classified by OSHAIWISHA as Type C. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped no steeper than 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical). The site soils encountered to depths of greater than four fleet would generally be classified by OSHAANISHA as Type A and B. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type A and Type B soils should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 0.75HAV and 1 H.1V, respectively. If appropriate slopes cannot be achieved, temporary shoring should be used to support the excavations. Permanent slopes should maintain a gradient of 2H:1V, or flatter, and should be planted with an appropriate species of vegetation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion. The geotechnical engineer should observe temporary and permanent slopes to verify that the inclination is appropriate, and to provide additional grading recommendations, as necessary. Utility Trench Backfill In our opinion, the soils observed at the test sites are generally suitable for support of underground utilities. Organic or highly compressible soils encountered in the trench excavations should not be used for supporting utilities. In general, the native soils observed at the test sites should generally be suitable for use as structural backfill in the utility trench excavations, provided the soil is at or near the optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Moisture conditioning of the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable specifications of the city or county jurisdictions, as appropriate. Pavement Sections The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To ensure adequate pavement performance, the subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill in pavement areas should be compacted to the specifications detailed in the Site Preparation and Earthwork section of this report. It is possible that soft, wet, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade areas may still exist after base grading activities. Areas of unsuitable or yielding subgrade will require remedial measures such as overexcavation and thicker crushed rock or structural fill sections prior to pavement. Cement treatment can also be considered for stabilizing pavement subgrade areas. DEVELo?M G T pLp N iNG C4N O. NOV 2 0 2006 Earth Solutions NW, LLC RECEIVED Seattle Redevelopment, LLC ES-0295 January 11, 2006 Page 8 For relatively lightly loaded pavements subjected to automobiles and occasional truck traffic, the following pavement sections can be considered: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) placed over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or; • Two inches of AC placed over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). The AC, ATB and CRIB materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. Heavier truck -traffic areas generally require thicker pavement sections depending on site usage, pavement life expectancy, and site traffic. ESNW can provide appropriate pavement section design recommendations for truck traffic areas and right-of-way improvements, as necessary. Additionally, city or county Road Standards may supersede the recommendations provided in this report. Foundations Based on the results of our study, single-family residential structures can be supported on conventional spread and continuous foundations bearing on competent native soils or structural fill, as appropriate. We anticipate that competent native soil suitable for support of foundations will generally be exposed at depths of between two to four feet below existing site grades. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill may be necessary. The following parameters should be used for the foundation design: • Allowable soil bearing capacity 2,500 psf (Structural Fill I Competent Native) • Passive Resistance 350 pcf • Coefficient of Friction 0.40 For short term wind and seismic loading, a one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can be assumed. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of approximately one-half of an inch. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. The passive resistance value provided above assumes the foundations will be backfilled with structural fill. A factor -of -safety of 1.5 has been applied to the passive resistance and friction values provided above. oUE c Earth Solutions NW, LLC �oN I p 2MS Rtecvjv Seattle Redevelopment, LLC January 11, 2006 ES-0295 Page 9 Foundation Setbacks Based on our review of the City of Renton Municipal Code, Chapter 4-3-050, and the available critical area maps maintained by the City of Renton, the subject site is not located within any critical areas. The soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork indicate the site is predominately underlain by dense, stable soil deposits. Based on the soil and groundwater conditions encountered at the site, a minimum building setback distance of ten feet from the top of the slope areas located along the western site boundary is appropriate, in our opinion. The geotechnical engineer should review the final design to verify building setback distances, and provide supplement recommendations, as appropriate. The geotechnical engineer should observe the building pad construction, and verify the minimum allowable building setback recommendations at the time of construction. Slab -On -Grade Floors Slab -on -grade floors for the residential buildings should be supported on a firm and unyielding subgrade consisting of competent native soil or structural fill. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with suitable structural fill prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free draining material should have a fines content of 5 percent or less (percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. Retaining Wails Retaining walls should be designed to resist earth pressures and any applicable surcharge loads. For design, the following parameters can be assumed for retaining wall design: • Active Earth Pressure (Yielding Wall) • At -Rest Earth Pressure (Restrained Wall) • Traffic Surcharge (Passenger Vehicles) • Passive Resistance Coefficient of Friction Earth Solutions NW, LLC 35 pcf (equivalent fluid) 50 pcf 70 psf (rectangular distribution) 350 pcf (equivalent fluid) 0.40 0EVEL0P � RFgTON � � ClT' O NOV 2 0 2006 F(ECEIVED Seattle Redevelopment, LLC ES-0295 January 11, 2006 Page 10 Additional surcharge loading from foundations, sloped backfill, or other loading should be included in the retaining wall design, as appropriate. Drainage should be provided behind retaining walls such that hydrostatic pressures do not develop. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic pressures should be included in the wall design, as appropriate. ESNW should review retaining wall designs to verify that appropriate earth pressure values have been incorporated into design, and to provide additional recommendations, as necessary. Retaining walls should be backfilled with free draining material that extends along the height of the wall, and a distance of at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The upper one foot of the wall backfill can consist of a less permeable (surface seal) soil, if desired. A rigid, perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wail, and connected to an appropriate discharge location. A typical retaining wall and drainage detail is illustrated on Plate 3 of this report. Drainage Groundwater seepage was not observed at the time of our fieldwork (December 2005). However, localized perched zones of groundwater seepage could be encountered in the site excavations, particularly during the wetter winter months. Temporary measures to control groundwater seepage and surface water runoff during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches, sumps, and temporary sedimentation ponds, as necessary. In our opinion, perimeter drains should be installed at or below the invert of the building footings. A typical footing drain detail is provided on Plate 4 of this report. Rockeries and Modular Block Walls We anticipate that rockeries or modular block walls may be utilized at this site. In our opinion, the use of rockeries or modular block walls at this site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Rockeries or modular block walls over four feet in height will require an engineered design. ESNW can provide engineered rockery and modular block wall designs, upon request. The geotechnical engineer should review the final wall alignments and wall heights with respect to the proposed site grading. Seismic Considerations The 2003 International Building Code specifies several soil profiles that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the soil conditions observed at the test sites, Site Class C, from table 1615.1.1, should be used for design. In our opinion, liquefaction susceptibility at this site is low. The medium dense to dense relative density of the site soils is the primary basis for this conclusion. Ie DEv)auop 0� RFC or��r'� Earth Solutions NW, LLC Seattle Redevelopment, LI_C January 11, 2006 ES-0290 Page 11 LIMITATIONS The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test sites may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Ot �04 2 a �oaa Earth Solutions NW, LLC ftECEIVED — : - ij = �L T PAR X c ?A;P s ST cF Burry CTH�II- g SE =E tf" ILL IT _ a;.:- '� •� t S; 5E SETN __ 'S7 .. y 3 89TH ST Q' SE 90TH ST <<vco - Ff4 Y v SE 915T 5T rft C16 CRF7FK j�uL r'•- 9PY0 5T 315T %� � 2BTH Tw ST —SE 27TH ~ST 1 h 277y - :I, -I HEIGHTS dE;J:YYCALL z ra a J S: ?�'S TH PARK 5T J 2-7N m .,_ ,erd_ rr N SE i 23r23 S r 51 - 5} ^�tS t o x z sl rn x - k •;Yry - �1 V _ e'\II T', _ ldlllr o -- x °+ ap STY Si Q° y .e ,wry" -- , I}a �o STD 'fy 5E 61Rr: - S, P_ COUGAr? , I h ''' itourrraiN ' I REGIONAL > PI s P` WILDLAA'0 II 86T'L m PARK L '� s - -' SE- SSE, `Z4Y> SF 93P.0 25TH 19 _7-L94N --- I i 4K IL ■Ep g 5E 1021N] S? U-fE737D E 75;i7 CT 1 ti ���EEE NE 22N0 k rw N� 22fd0 ST '- r. = ST A. �` 4l - NE- 21 ST_ F zzr o P Nc 2157 e _,rx r..- > i Tr' ° z r NE ' 11THSr � 1 E 197! Eo - sT ar a •h NOflf� CRFF! _ - � %97;1 ST r _ txP;EN NE 1S1 Jh7RiN IF - Si aH ANDS i5 ST tt ri- y P c`K ¢ s. z 16 :l, N= � � 17TN - 5-- xr Sri N[ 13TH p u I} ,3�n L!B c' '= I NE ' Z' 12TH a ST 12Th ST ti L � r R,.,� N ]r1. v IT;I ` _ ,., HE ICr Ic JUN ST e _ 0TH 2, NE LOTH r' ST i� VE 5TH PL as, a tyE 9TH ST hE 9rNP KIWANIS -, PARK HE ST?_ - [1 ti� n 4 0 -i CD 1!£Jr� NiGHLA17il5 i Y SS '[ ,I, NE 8TH 51 7TH NE 7Ty PARK S:,Nt BZH '' YE 7TH ¢ ST HE 0 5 STa1 _ ST e - 7TH 57 Reference: King County Map 626 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 2006 NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Si 7JCT.i W I I I SE ltlp ¢ .7 S[ '.95TH NL 1 ' S 'IMF F :rF " SE 112Tr S 7c I • L D=us F-rrr r I x j [IG' IF-- _fF si,�IL i N ��IM v: SlN P I� $t 9TH �� � 116 fJ7 z SI HE 9TH ST S NE 9TH'" ST = v CI = =_ .� gar J71i Alµ - �E I SE �. - SE ;121ST ST 7F. 7TN '� r — — —' 5E 1122Nil o TLFS N ' 'fit { Earth Solutions NW LLc Vicinity Map Lefler Property King County, Washington Drwn_ GLS IDate Jan. 2006 I Checked SSR I Date 01/11120061 Plate .1., " nt rs I T N rlb-C 440 R 435 k W i023J590S0 LV Z 430 W a I � O N.E. 6th STREET i i i i f i I �45 450 455 460 9023059394 3 I f I _ITP-1 f ( TP-61 k � � f � I 1023059397 - — 1 I{{ 46Q 1 TIP-7 I 1 TP-2 7023059208 I — I i TP-3 I TP-4 TP_5 — f —■— f I S.E. 124th STREET 430 435 449 445 450 455 1023059123 LEGEND TP-2——Approximate Location of ESNW Test Pit, Proj. No. ES-0295, Dec. 2005 k Subject Site L---I NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of existing and ! or proposed site features. The information illustrated is largely based on data provided by the client at the time of our study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes or interpretation of the data by others. NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information resulting from blade & white reproductions of this plate. 7023059385 NORTH Not - To - Scale -i lie • — — Test Pit Location Plan Lefler Property King County, Washington Drwn. GLS Date Jan- 2006 Pr� gt ' 7 � Checked SSR Date01/11/2006 Plate Noy 4 N 18" Min 4 12" '' •max'. 0. Q o .o..�.� o° �o 0 q o P p o O O O Q O O p ° p O p0 0 o -1 -r 0. -0, G p O P p a op f 00 O0 C P OC O o °p °° Structural # t 0 O p p P O O Q . p o° o 0 0 Fill 0. 0 0 Q O oO0 � .E o 0 a Q. O W' O O p P O p P O O 40 0 0 P Oo 0 p 0 -9 p0 — 0 B 0 0 Da p 0°0 ram` o p O 1 ��ti•: NOTES: • Free Draining Backfill should consist of soil having less than 5 percent fines. Percent passing #4 should be 25 to 75 percent_ • Sheet Drain may be feasible in lieu of Free Draining Backfill, per ESNW recommendations_ • Drain Pipe should consist of perforated, rigid PVC Pipe surrounded with 1" Drain Rock. LEGEND: Surface Seal; Native Soil or other Low Permeability Material 0 op Free Draining Structural Backfill 0 P 11 jtS+5 l'n 1inch Drain Rock Perforated Drain Pipe (Surround In Drain Rock) SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING FILE Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround with 1" Rock) NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of 12" of less permeable, suitable soil. Slope away from building. LEGEND: Surface Seal; native soil or other low permeability material, r•r.r•r•r ;4ti 4ti+ $.f.r.r.r 1� Drain Rock S•ti•ti•ti• SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT OT SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Earth� SOIUHOHS NrrLLG Solutions Nw i tc y'f Wneering, Construcdon Monitoring d Environmental Sciences FOOTING DRAIN Lefler Property King County, Washington Drwn. GLS I Date Jan. 2006 1ProI~O r�NTO Checked SSR I Date01112/2006 I Plate R�C APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ES-0295 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating seven test pits. The approximate test pit locations are illustrated on Plate 2 of this report. The test pit logs are provided in this Appendix. The subsurface exploration was completed in December 2005. The test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of eight feet below existing grades. Logs of the test pits excavated by ESNW are presented in Appendix A. The final logs represent the interpretations of the field logs and the results of laboratory analyses. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Solutions NW, LLG tarth Solutions NVYLLC SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVELS 'i4 S. 6 do i ■0 A. GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES ° 3' ° d' a p�P p Q C) oQ IG' P POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELLY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) COARSE GRAAINED MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE GRAVELS O ° a p GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND- SILT MIXTURES FRACTION GC G CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SAND AND CLEAN SANDS SW WELL -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES S'P POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES LARGER THAN N0. 2a0 SIEVE SIZE SANDY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) WITH SM SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES MORE THAN 50%SANDS OF COARSE OF FRACTION S C CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES PASSING ON NO- 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE: �� SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS FINE GRAINED SOILS SILTS LIQUID LIMIT AND LESS THAN 50 CLAYS �L ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SILTY SOILS SIZE SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS GREATER THAN 50 f7 CI„I INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY. ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS \51 „ PT PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understandin�befe of the material presented in the attached logs. 2�0� NON 0 Earth Solutions NW, LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-1 2603 151 st PI. NE PAGE 1 OF 1 w, � Redmond. WA 9805 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT T & M Land Development PROJECT NAME Lefler Property PROJECT NUMBER 0295 PROJECT LOCATION King County Washington DATE STARTED 12/15/05 COMPLETED 12115/05 GROUND ELEVATION 455' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR N1N Excavatin4 _ GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION - LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION -- NOTES Depth of Topsail & Sod 6": forest duff AFTER EXCAVATION --- W _ CL r � W TESTS � o p §-1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a� a z m c� W 0 Brown silty SAND, loose to medium dense, moist MC = 16.30% SM Fines = 21,20% 4.0 Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist 5 -becomes grayish brown SM _becomes dense MC = 6.30% : s a Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 8.0 feet. y%v-- a a] w 19 Earth Solutions NW, LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-2 2603 151st PI. NE PAGE 1 OF 1 Redmond, WA 9805 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT T S; M Land Development PROJECT NAME Lefler Property PROJECT NUMBER 0295 PROJECT LOCATION King County,Washington DATE STARTED 12/15/05 COMPLETED 12/15/05 GROUND ELEVATION 440- TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION -- NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": forest duff AFTER EXCAVATION - w EL r 0: I-- ua TESTS vi U to a O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LU C6 � � Z Q U7 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist -occasional cobbles MC = 11.50% -becomes dense SM 5 -becomes grayish brown MC = 9.60% 8.4 Fines = 24.30% Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 8.0 feet. Earth Solutions NW, LLC 2603 151st Pl. NE Redmond, WA 980! Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 TEST PIT NUMBER TP-3 PAGE 1 OF 1 CLIENT T & M Land Development PROJECT NAME Lefler Property PROJECT NUMBER 0295 PROJECT LOCATION King County, Washington DATE STARTED 12/15/05 COMPLETED 12/15/05 GROUND ELEVATION 435' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": forest duff AT TIME OF EXCAVATION AT END OF EXCAVATION AFTER EXCAVATION --- ur CL ul W ua TESTS ui v 06 2 = ° p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a� 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist MC = 11.40% -becomes dense SM -trace cobbles 5 MC = 8.50°% s o Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 8.0 feet. G�(O�R��o Iry Earth Solutions NW, LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP4 i 2603 151st Pl. NE W & Redmond, WA 9805 PAGE 1 OF 1 Wm Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT T & M Land Development PROJECT NAME Lefler Property PROJECT NUMBER 0295 PROJECT LOCATION Kin q County, Washington DATE STARTED 12/15/05 COMPLETED 12115/05 GROUND ELEVATION 445' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavatinq GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION --- LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION --- NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4": forest duff AFTER EXCAVATION --- I— Lu _ a. TESTS 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 4z va 0 Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist MC = 14.30% Fines = 27.60% -oxide staining SM -becomes dense 5 MC = 11.20% '. 7.5 Test pit terminated at 7.6 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 7.5 feet. Earth Solutions NW, LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-5 2603 151st Pl. NE Redmond, WA 9805 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 42 52843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT T & M Land Development PROJECT NAME Lefler Property PROJECT NUMBER 0295 PROJECT LOCATION King County, Washington_ DATE STARTED 12/15105 COMPLETED 12/15/05 GROUND ELEVATION 455' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION LOGGEDBY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION -- NOTES _Depth of Topsoil & Sod 3": brush AFTER EXCAVATION — w s W w vi Uj TESTS rA °L p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o�' ct U) Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist MC = 21.00% SM -oxide staining -becomes dense 5 -becomes gray MC = 12.10% . 7.0 Fines = 34.50% Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. 1 �iGVG1T`� 0 Earth Solutions NW, LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-6 Wid 2603 151st PI. NE PAGE 1 OF 1 Redmond, WA 9805 Telephone: 4252843300 Wiwi Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT T & M land Development PROJECT NAME Lefler Property PROJECT NUMBER 0295 PROJECT LOCATION King County, Washington DATE STARTED 12/15/05 COMPLETED 12/15/05 GROUND ELEVATION 460' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -- LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION -- NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 8": forest duff AFTER EXCAVATION w CL s w ~w J � TESTS 0 q _ a. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ❑ M Z C� 0 Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist SM . . 1.5 Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist MC = 9.80% SM .: -becomes dense 5 MC = 11.60% 7.0 Test pit terminates! at 7.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. Gov Earth Solutions NW, LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-7 r 2603 151 st Pl. NE Redmond, WA 9805 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT T & M Land Development PROJECT NAME Lefler Property PROJECT NUMBER 0295 PROJECT LOCATION King County, Washington DATE STARTED 12/15/05 COMPLETED 12/15/05 GROUND ELEVATION 455' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION - LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION -- NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4": forest duff AFTER EXCAVATION — w r 0r �w 'i U z TESTS p MATERIAL DESCRIPTION d z c� 0 Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist MC = 14.50% Fines = 23.90% SM -becomes dense 5 -slightly cemented MC = 9.30% 6.0 Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 6.0 feet, �a oortr oV Nay X.1D �, r APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ES-0295 'V c OF �ge�ffO �>NG Gov 2 0 20 Earth Solutions NVV, LLC Ea rth WIL IN INN luld Ilium III solill III liiimmii I -- a 1111111111 MORRIS Big 11 1111111111 Ilium Milli ismillillism MINOR III III I ILI Millill§Mlllll lismillill a 101 E�INNI Hilloollill INN MINIMUM I 111 0 11 lllmmiiiioimmiiiiiilmm llmmiiii Ilium llilikklk\�imp I iiiiiiino NINE Ilium llomilini Hillill nommiiiilmuuiommiiiioimmilol Milli lismilillin liiiiiinmiiiiiilmmiio'1111 III 11111 NINE 111111111 milimmiiiiiimm--ii 0 lmimmuiium liiiiiinmuiiiiimmiiiiu NINE GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS LCOBBLES GRAVEL coarse fine SAND I SILT OR CLAY coarse medium fine Specimen Identification • TP-1 2.Oft. m TP-2 8.Oft. A TP-4 3.Oft. x * J TP-5 7.Oft. O TP-7 2.5ft. Specimen Identification D100 • TP-1 2.Oft. 19 m Li TP-2 8.Oft. 37.5 U A TP- 4 3.0ft. 19 J ° * TP-5 7.0ft. 37.5 o I TP-7 2.5ft. 19 Classification Brown silty SAND, SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, SM Light brawn silty SAND, SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, SM Light brown silty SAND, SM D60 D30 D10 0.352 0.121 2.251 0.125 0.376 0.087 0.345 0.388 1 0.115 LL I PL 1 PI 1 Cc I Cu %Gravel %Sand 13.5 65.3 36.5 39.3 10.7 61.7 19.3 46.2 7.0 69.2 G t� sm 4 COPIES REPORT DISTRIBUTION ES-0295 Seattle Redevelopment, LLC c/o J & M Land Development P.O. Box 2566 Renton, Washington 98056 Attention: Mr. Marc Rousso Earth Solutions NW, LLC CON OF Gov 2 o 20 �kecewv i CHICAGO TITLE NT�URANCE COMPANY 701 FiFM AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 981{}4 ORDER NO: YOUR NO: UNU NO: LOAN NO_ SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT K PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 001179476 LEFLER 10 O R D E R R E F E R E N C E I N F 0 R M A T I 0 N SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER: 1 OF THE SECOND CERTIFICATE SELLER: PURCHASER/BORROWER: SEATTLE REDEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 10/04/06 at 8:00 A-M. is supplemented as follows. - a THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE OCTOBER 4, 2006. a OCTOBER 31, 2006 AUTHORIZED BY: MIKE HARRIS p NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS MATT CYR 1/1 SEATTLE REDEVELOPMENT MARC ROUSSO 2/1 NOV 2 2006 RF'o SUFMZ0M/RDA/UM CHICAGO TITL_ __14SURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001179476 PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Your No.: LEFLER ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS 33915 1ST WAYS. SUITE 200 FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 RECEIVED ATTN: MATT CYR 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you_ <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNTT 10 -YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER_ WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACOUISITION, DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS =E OFFICER (206) 628-5623 (&MAIL: MICHAEL.HARRIS@CTT_COM) KEI TH EISENBREY 'ITfLE OFFICER (206) 628-8377 (E-MAIL: KEnE.EISENBREY@CTT.COM) SEEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206) 628-5614 (E-MAIL: STEVE.KINSELLA@CTT.COM) BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER: (206) 628-5657 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> NEW ADDRESS ALERT: CHICAGO TITLE has moved its Seattle office from the 18th to the 34th floor of the Bank of America Tower. Effective January 20, 2004, our new address is: 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98104 Our phone and fax numbers are still the same, but please note that our e-mail addresses haveWR`�pove. ove, NOV ? 0 2006 RF—CO i' D 7TT"LEi'!3/RDA/0999 `ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TH AVENUE, #MOO, SEATT'LE, WA 99104 SECOND CERTIFICATE PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 1179476 Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County, to -wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: GERALD S. LEFLER, LESLIE R. KENWORTHY, DEBBIE KEENWORTHY AND VICKY L_ THOMPSON, EACH AS TO A ONE -QUARTER INTEREST, AS THEIR SEPARATE ESTATE EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: $17. 6 0 Records examined to OCT02ER 4, 2006 at 8 : 00 AM NTPLANNING By Cir` Of- REN fON HARRI S/ E I SENBREY NOV 2 a 2006 Title Officer (206) 628-5623 EI 111.ATCRTAIRDA/Q999 '1ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1179476 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE SOUTH 30 FEET AND THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; EXCEPT ANY PORTION OF SAID EASEMENT LYING WITHIN COUNTY ROAD. &UY �.��..., NOV 2 0 2006 PIATCRT[ /fWA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Order No.: 1179476 This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS' A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D- Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REPORT 1S ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). rrATCRTE/XDA/o9W TICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY -) a a Lp PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1179476 EXCEPTIONS 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVED BY: ARTHUR C. SORENSON AND BETTY E_ SORENSON, HIS WIFE PURPOSE: ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AREA AFFECTED: THE EAST 30 FEET RECORDED: DECEMBER 12, 1960 RECORDING NUMBER: 5231765 2. ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: NOVEMBER 13, 1987 8711131412 3. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES 2006 102305-9208-07 4342 $ 279,000.00 $ 5,000.00 BILKED: $ 3,6S1.17 PAID: $ 3,651.17 UNPAID: $ 0.00 s 4. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. NOTE 1: A SURVEY HAS BEEN RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7612029002. r NOTE 2: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE k1�'llil i 11yy,lli'1v REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY T plQ�Y RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. 2� FLAT441ON&76A - HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN "- PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1179476 FOR DETAILS OF THESE STATEWIDE REQUIREMENTS PLEASE VISIT THE KING COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT WWW. METROKC. GOV/RECELEC/ RECORDS AND SELECT ONLINiE FORMS AND DOCUMENT STANDARDS - THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PTN OF NW SE, 10-23-5 END OF SCHEDULE B C1T; O` NOV 2 U 2006 " HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN` PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1179476 a THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS COMMITMENT: ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS MATT CYR I/1 SEATTLE REDEVELOPMENT MARC ROUSSO 2/1 Oti-f-y Off. IRL- av 9 NN Y� FLA=2/RDA/0--A CHICAGO TITL, SURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628-5623 FAX: (206)628-5657 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. pT N IVw S z S IO T23N �� �_: V477114 KC 7004120N2 Ary -.21 6C 9M9 I 4 4.01 AZ i� PCLtYti flfl "9094.26 AC � !D .63 PCL 2 h m ~ =7903070767 0.41 AC 6P 777009 = 27 ,op ow 0.9 Aco a ISO �2� ~g'ta 3'y Z ry 9X7 m w 30 0.28 AE 0 9� o0 A' mz N 89-2D-34 M a42730or = % h ti5.69 2.5 AC w 0.19 A 0.19 AC AC 9200 m ' 9= 9377 ° 4133 v 7N- 9M on 30' R0.- E Z-30• AU. ESO. IS.Aj itl - - ;-"---02--�-- U7 to P a° Lar 2 i *°py .39 AC � N h OO 'S� sm ' 3: Q � KC SP 4801% 8200100434 3e CU a 34s3/ 2°0420 a7 21730 SF m I n O ICt 1.& 1 - z 9'Va329• O� b z � !�c 19 AC O c �� tl_23 AC � cr #a° ONO XLLJ 4 Q F 1 0= N' m 2.B3 LC °g a N m 4251 �. 9t?3 AC D2t2 J a 10 � orti 34 AC 200GO70300OGG5.001 After recording return to: LAW OFFICES OF DAN KELLOGG SUITE 249, EVERGREEN BUILDING 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 425-227-8700 20060 KELLOGG 70 07/03/2096 081 OF 10429 KING COUNTY, Wa . 35.00 E2219441 87/03/2006 10:29 KING COUNTY, WR $10.00 SALE $0.08 PAGE001 OF 001 DOCUMENT TITLE: PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED GRANTOR(S): GERALD S. LEFLER and LELLIE R. KENWORTHY, PRs GRANTEE (S): GERALD S. LEFLER, LESLIE R. KENWORTHY, VICKY L. THOMPSON, and DEBBIE L. KENWORTHY ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 102305 208 WE 1-� of S sl of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON ATTACHMENT ASSESSOR'S TAX/PARCEL NUMBER(S): 102305-9208 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED 1. GRANTOR. The undersigned Grantor, GERALD S. LEFLER and LESLIE R. KENWORTHY, are the duly appointed, qualified and acting Personal Representatives of the Estate of SYLVIA L. LEFLER, Deceased. 2. ESTATE. Sylvia L. Lefler died on November 20, 2004 and Gerald S. Lefler and Leslie R. Kenworthy were appointed Personal Representatives on October 14, 2005 in the State of Washington Superior Court for King County in Cause No. 05-4-05095-8 (the "probate proceedings"). 3. NONINTERVENTION POWERS. By Order of Solvency entered on October 14, 2005 in the probate proceedings, Grantor was authorized to settle the Estate without further court intervention or supervision_ 4. DESCRIBED PROPERTY. Included among the property of the Estate of SYLVIA L. LEFLER Deceased, was decedent's interest in real property described on the attached exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. 5. CONVEYANCE OF DECEDENT'S INTEREST IN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. Grantor hereby bargains, sells, and conveys to GERALD S. LEFLER, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED - I a 20060703000665.002 f LESLIE R. KENWORTHY, DEBBIE A, KENWORTHY, AND VICKY L. THO-�PSON, each as to a one -quarter interest as their separate property estate all. of Grantor's interest in the Described Property which interest represents the decedent's interest in the property at the time of decedent's death. 6. LIMITATION OF COVENANTS. Grantor expressly limits the covenants of this deed to those expressed herein and excludes all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or other implication. The obligations of the Grantor expressed herein are the obligations of the Estate of SYLVIA L. LEFLER, and not the Personal Representative, personally. Dated: February 4—, 2006. GERALD S. LEFLER as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sylvia L. Lefler, Deceased, and not in his individual capacity E LIE R. KENWORTHY as Personal. Represen j ' e of the Estate of Sylvia L efler, Deceased, and not in his individual capacity STATE OF WASHINGTON ) } ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that GERALD S. LEFLER and LESLIE R. KENWORTHY are the persons who appeared before me, and who signed this instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED - 2 -,1 20060703000666.003 acknowledged it as the Personal Representatives of SYLVIA L. LEFLER to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: February , 2006_ LNOTA 314 UCaHS Notary Public in and f the State of UBLIC Washy ngtonC�anf, His i gH NGTON Notary: ! EXPIRES My appointment expires: PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED - 3 �j .� 20060703000665.004 ATTACHMENT "A" Legal Description of Unimproved 2.5 acres The west half of the south half of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, WM, in King County, Washington: TOGETHER WITH an easement for road and utility purposes over and across the south 30 feet and the west 30 feet of the east half of the south half of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 10: EXCEPT any portion of said easement lying within County Road Situate in King County, Washington PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED - 4 Of o'- IC) .` S bs I A r:: R _ r WD Vol, j r )>ACrC Q F ti RfG,icS CA ire z g �, y �� � xrr wAs a •-- , IDin , EnH�wryy s: a F rw x Statutory warrcmY t be ad THE GRANTOR ART1iUR C. SeR c:]SON and B ;E [ 7Y E. SORE.`:iG; E, his u f { e � 16r avid in onsideratiun of Ten Do l a r s and ott,er coo(: an luahl a C.onsIdcrat trans in. -hind paid, ctmrrys and warrants to .,:_iiri 1 S Cr?Ai.'n , a widow �^ thr felltmng JcscrA td real atate,-sitmted in riac Couuty of 1(11g , Stan n! ��d�hingson: Tfte West of the. South i cf t'lte: Suvtl;wes► ti-o: the NorLh- Nest 4 0; t tt Saut;se3st j o: $ectSon ]G, T&wnship Z3 North, '4anue 5 vTa�f: ;T'? art s asv.men: f or raa? and rti I i Ey ^dr;�osr. s -i•li;'1,cres. tic SoLth 30feet and Ltie 42st -n ;vet Of the rif t`: Sou'?: o.f the 5cs:thwest of -.c '44)rthwest ; of the 5on'.;teast of sa4 Se r.ti�r� 10, EX_U7 any zortlnn Of said easernertt ]yin-, wi'_`7i 7% =et;ity i?C,a �i }sa e .r the fart^Lv trj }tint:, St'te of vlaShirct0it t h= 5, antI)rcr i oad and t t,i l i Ly t r:r nsa Cu«^ and :ice, t. � t�,. �rst i �a-1 n,' t,'le '.SPst t??c `-.out.': } of t!te r - n' tnF iSort west y of the Sotst>teast 1 ar., sairi A, A. IREWPIR. KI,+G f Giliii'i i:ii�::rs+i;R - 1 Ry Ins <Sr rd is vrven in fuihllmrnt of LbAl eertaln real esimle tonfracl between the parllrs h••: ••lo. :tr ir. r7 September 1,3 _ 19Sg- en•'-••a-rttio.r• .ned Icr the conveyance of thr ,•,sr +lrxcri :,, •1 ]rnpr•rtY, nr: tl sI= covi—niA elf •a� _ 'c heft in Contained AaJi not ap: f1' to }- ar+ttrlr, i :alrrs•'til rncuml,r a[: Cf •Irn<inr. rr .-iYtih •,r vndpr the DUlcllasei In said crintract, aAd srreJJ f—E �.,P•'r d., one fa rrS. a%sessrfirms n. other Charges lewd, assesstd or be Coin Jng due subseQUerri [n [ham dnEr of catd fe-, nlr acl- �rrt�,.: :ail ra.<rrn ..r:rtc re•::: ri r:rt�,n4 :rn r5 rr•. r:,arions ul record. it my. r�-iLr ri J)arrdthis li_'t.'t i1''yal Se+item.cr F y p. 4 -r-t-rF, OF iCAy�l]�GT€), usunam' - • 4i. i l f)n this day personally apptartd Wort me ARTIfUR ! 50" REN50N and Ii ET t'Y E. `.,t-".'-<i5t- In mr kn(—, n, t>e the :ndm,t-ls dr.,erit,ed in .—I whu ... er-"-i :Iw z'ilhin and J,rrrguing inmrizmrni, and {kr„wlyd�rd' at t Zo V signed the s•arne as t?12 i r tree and voluntary 30 and der+l. Lrr the us+. I,ur) jt �nC rrsrs therein mrnliuned. ^ GIVE\' under my hand andoffiCia seal this ^'� day ai �1'olaryr PVblic in end Jo' lift Srerearhin�ron, rt.[idaet cr R e n t o rt ✓✓✓✓✓✓ t.c_)lron M7%rded re torn to 3tlraxr�-Shi�l�}g f:4CIr' �.cc�itSr.+ten 4Y�t'.a f■ . lnn�l 425 Pike St s,* 5 W k.WA 98101 ROAD lA AIMTKMAMC ►LT AGREEMENT This Road Maintenance Agreement entered into this 2 W day of September, 1987, h-- and batween the following parties: 1. Ms. Sylvia Wood 12255-142nd Ave. S.E. +�* Renton, WA 98056 _.. 2. Ater. Jerry J. Madison Mrs. Julie A. Madison .. 12407-142nd Ave. S.E. 1 Renton, WA 96C56 �.. 3. Mr. G. W. Sutherland Mrs- Donna D. Sutherland 14029 S.E. 124th St. Renton, WA 96056 !!_'13 41412 R i A. ?Ar. 'NarrQr. McDo.nrell RECD F 11.Oct { 14114 S.E. 124th St. CASHS1 Renton, WA 93056 1 5. lAr_ Michael F. Prummer ' 14106 S.E. 124th St. f Renton, WA 98056 Said parties are all residents of Renton, King County, Washington and reside at the addresses Above stated. The parties' properties are legally described .~ Exhibit A, which', is attached hereto and Incr+rporated 1. That the parties hereto are adjacent real property owners to and users of a parcel of r2Al property utilized for purposes of InFreec and cares_ to thalr land. Said Property is legally described as foliowe: That portion of parcel *2 of Short Plat No. 777009, under auditor's file nu. 7803C: -"'S7 descrt'.>cd as the south 30 feet o. parcel •2, and the Wiest 30 feet of the North 124 feet of the South 154 feet. Said parcel of rent property directly benefits the parties hereto and thair land and shall be hereafter referred to as the " 124th St.road". This agreement shall apply to the entire private road to its ROAD MAINT=NANc>r AGREEMENT 1 �pJ1TP( OF41 PSTos' EG PL_ intersection with #h approximately 30' in 142nd Ave. S.E. to th running north from .Jtermination. (fie reference hereto.) e public road of 142nd Ave. S.E. Said road is width and 300.71' in length, running west from ¢ western border of parcel R2, and 154' in length, the Sn west corner of parcel *2 to the roads attache: exhibit A, which is incorporated by 2. That the parties agree, for the benefit of their property, to share equally In the costs and expenses of maintaining the 124th St. road in good repair, in perpetuity_ Kr 4-4 !+� 'In good repair" shall be defined as providing a road which is safe to H Lie utilized without damage or fear of damage to onn-s parson or L vehicles. Dtterrnination of the need of maintenance or repair on said road shall be decided by a majority of the parties herein or their successors or assigns in interest. Each residence shall have one vote_ This agreement shall run with the land of the parties hereto, so long as said party utilizes the 124th St. road as ingress and/or egress to their property. If any party should transfer or convey their property In any manner, this obligation of maintenance- and repair to the 124th St. road sail be conveyed as a p&rt of said transfer or conveyance. Should any party no lori;er necessitate use of the road as an ingress or egress to their property, said party shall give notice In writing to all other parties hereto (or their successors or as2igns of interest) of the intent to discontinue the use of said I24th St. road and thus relieving said party of any obtigatian to maintain and right to use said road. 3. That this agr-22me}._: �_: -r be amended or modified from time to time :ry a n-[jority r. .,eement of the parties hereio. SY &Ao o d Jer h adison G. W. Sutherland Warren McDowell //Julie A_ !Madison Donn Sutherland ichnel F. Prummer Tvir�wxltl* /1 ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 55. COUNTY OF KING Donna OD, t W,-' t ' 'Ll Y 13 1111W onally appeared before me G. 11. Sutherland and to me known to be the individual(s) described In and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and ackno-mled8ed th4t - they signed the same as their freq and voluntary act and deed, for the urea and purposes-'therq}ri" C4 mentioned. ..... . .0 � 2 GIVEN under my hand and official Baal this - September, 1987 NOT PUBLIC and .fora the Sta e I gton, r4zsiding nt _U[wntlnlrn Tp,r--LC-Q—, Commission expires: --a/-?-I/g STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me J-.Ilchael F. Prummer — to me known to be the descrfbed in and who executed the within and foregoing Instrument, .and acknovrledged that I r, signed the same as h i s free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN untie* nand and off;uJal al this 23 '(Jf. "Y 1110T Ic h W-it 're' , , " ..' - Star, gt n' re'affig at mintiake IerraCe­'­—"' Commission expires: -.S/?-IZ9 ROAD MAINTENANCE AGIREEMENT 4 4 A STATE OFF WASHINGTON ) ) 55. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me .ytx - P a=ED trrnnw_0,-_ to me known to be the individual(s) described it and NArho executed th, '"Iithin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that _ he signed the same as h�1s free . and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposestherein Mentloned. October GIVF.Pi under my hand and affJcial {meal this 1987. r; X DTA .lor State on, r'esiding; �,•;'_ at Mountlake Terrace a.., Commission expires: B 21 9 , STATE OF WAS:iINGTON ) ) S3. COUNTY OF RING } On this day personally appeared before me Sylvza Wood to me known to be the individuals) ( described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledgiid that sh L, signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official e 1 this f 'day" of v-4 September, 1987. 7 NOt-4'R PUBLIC and';far: the State ngton;'.rgsf Ing at Afountlake Terrace "' ' Commission expires: 8227 90 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF RING 1 0cs this dayJerry J. hfadison and Julie A , i,fad i Sorsanally appeared before me to me known to be the indlvJdual(s) described in and who executed thz vrithin and foregoing instrv-nent, and acknowledged that Lhey signed the same a3 the and voluntary act deec[, for the !: es and purpp¢ey,ttkgirc�?ri':?,_. GIMi under my hand and official sgal this=��! •dam �t September, 1987. NOTP L1C and far t 5:-_r- Way... Igton, residing at 04l[nt1 athl_Terrilef _ Commission expires: 8/21/� ROAD MAMTXNANCE AGREEMENT 3 EXHIBIT Ei The legal description of the real property b--nefiting from this Road Maintenanc2 Agreement is listed hereinafter and such is Incorporated Into saki Agreement of which this Exhibit A is attached thereto: I, Ownerr: SyMa Wood Address: 12255-14>-id Ave. S.E., Renton, IAIA 98056 Tax !stet. No.: 9338-00 and 9208--07 Legal Description: (9330-00) The East 77.5 feet of the West 107.5 feet of the North 124 feet of the South 154 feet of the East half of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the a4 Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 10, 11 Township 23 north, Range 5 east, W.M. 1� (9200--07) The West half of the South half of the Southwest i4 quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 Fast, W.M. r, r 2. Owner- Jerry- J_ Madison and .Tulle A. Anderson Address: 12407-t42nd Ave. S.E., Rentcn, WA 98056 Tax Acet. No.: 9385-02 and 9015-00 Legal Description_ (9385-02) Lot 2 of King County Short Piat No, 480111, King County Auditor's F11c No. 8206100431, (9015-00) The easterly 206.01 feet as measured along the North line of the North half of the North half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. 3. Owner: G. W. Sutherland and, Donna D. Sutherland Address: 14029 S.E. 124th St., Renton., WA 98056 Tax Acct, No.: 9123-09 Legal Description- I,ot 1 of Ping County Short Plat No. 480111, Kin�t County e _;_:vr s i ode No. 8206290431. 4. Cam:-.rr: Warren A. McDowell Addres3: 14114 S.E. 124th St., Renton, WA 98056 Tax Acct. No.: 9377-02 Legal Description: The East 77.50 feet of the West 185 feet of the North 124 .feet of South 154 feet of the East half of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Sec .' n 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. 5. Owner: Michael P_ Prummer Address: 14106 S.E. 124th St., Renton, WA 98056 Tax Acct. No.: 9397-08 Legal Description: Parcel *2 of King County Short Plat No. 777009, King County Auditor's File No. 760307075. 70b �D�• 3 r l} '• �• R �IF � L mot, ` � r f i , 4 � ♦( H �.y 0 —f" O `r� .1 � cif♦ T� r, lk' 4. �"s�iP..rlMY. — ``! •1 I . LOT ♦+ • RC sr siorrr— szosra0434 ,10 "—c_ LOT ! _ a "(% 3� .sr�. . Q t "I rXe_:Y • _ �s� �s !r. +� —TEX --J2 LOT f s LOT 2 KC SF 14 R1. —7904#2 6 LOT 4 ' + sr O_ s H • R y ti 1 a ra ti 4 ��t f•S:y!1 Printed: 11-20-2006 Payment Made CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-143 11 /20/2006 04:39 PM Total Payment: 2,500.00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Receipt Number: R0605781 Payee: SEATTLE REDEVELOPMENT LLC Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 2,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #1278 2,500.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000,345.81.00,0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000,345.81,00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345,81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000,345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 604,237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 Balance Due .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00