Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Report 1
r i I I 1 I I I ` I I I I rl 1 I 1 i I 1 1d qr ` I j r Q cn 7 t I I I(I N f I 1 r I 15 3� I s1 If 1 vraYr7 rmGp I ---------------- I I f eae i R�R I I A I I A r I • f i 1 2 - _ HQQUTAM__AVE. N.E...... ......... g - �° m m T D i In lip 1 ;9- Fn PRE IMINARYL4NDSCAPEPLAN a Am CONNER PUGETCOLONYSHORTPLA TI € CONNER MOMS ����orsrcu b Q qq�HM axo s w RA'[R7N S/f7fNS F.[ &6 /W(f 91 -wC sr l c�wee r�wo +..,..... BFUFNf ISaq�N•N �'r SHEET 2 OF 2 P U G E T COLONY SHORT PLAT 11 LUA-08-1415-SEPL SW 1/4, NE 1 j4. SEC- 15. TWF. 23 N., RUE. 5E, W.M. TND-zO-0474 CITY OF REINTON, KING COUNT', WASHINCTON BASIS OF BEARINGS 645`1TWT AS CMCUATE➢ BFPNEEN MO"DITS FpOtp H PIAfE AT THE INTFBSET70N OF E 1, A.E 5E. I SE2NO ! R. AND THE tRTMSE:T10N OF � :AN AW SE, MB HE. 151 5T, PSP RgT pNCE I REFEMNN ICES I. Tf MAT OF W' rO MI ROUES wRUHE B6, F gG 59 2. TEE PEAL OF LAVA JB`T VOENE ZM PACES i —5P SCALE: 1" = 30' MGM0 9 t5 3p 60 FC D NCYMIEHI AS NOTE➢ v SET r—F IT 1G IN E. 91 ERONT LOB. nr IX 7 INGCATEU SET 1/2' C 24' 9SHAF W/57 ILDW PIASTL W $'wm 'CORE ' 2" O EWNU CJNER 1S HOT1 �F PRIVATE OPANITF FASE-ENT (49N� CiT" OF W: H Y`411 AOURESS ,'i'. I SE 2ND ST. SE. 2NU PL COMIA711 N98wa lom 10] alWadllnpro� 9H007 425,885.7877 FUA 425,985.7963 DESIGN ENGINEERING • PCANNfNG - SURVEYING JOB ■��40. 06124 r CITY OF ppCLT COLON SHORT PLOTS 1 & 2 ?11L, RENTON TITLE SHEET & HORIZONTAL VERTICAL CONTROL CI. Di i� I ~ ----'-�---- -- ----�— ---- »ACX/dAM.CVENf N $� z SO gl 's a � � m ' R �ag # � y a 516 LSD n nnnn ,- OS�. g000 sa0 a�' z�rs�x$ oaf a� O N 2 �NOTES ^� CITY OF PUCR'T COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 m "` RENTON '� EH CONTROL PLAN, �'"' `W"°"��"'°°'�� "� °fPf� NfJTES` & DET.�ILS C2. of wo. rsrnswi wse wPw d e • sr:i�s .. • "`°""' Al 1 h I _ I. bONY lI i h pig m �Co z s m A M M M � LLLJ i a c� __ ' 1fOQ(/(4hIAVENE �_ 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 6" AU H o a "1 7 01 IRM$' ti4pq @ N���g fib= 't�� wzoxao art: ! .. s® CITY (IF' PUChT COLONY SHORT PL4T5 I & —1� RENTON I�P "°a s ° STORM DRAINAGE PLAN & NOTES C4.01 A, - ���d #•� ��� �� �9 �3ga�� ��� ��g�g � #91� p��5� � � �y�y gg��� �� �y I '' I' � i - ... . i -- _ _-- ---------- --- - ._ - ---------- n vd a ■d v$ a 4 R� ea� EAll $S D ddd ee A � &e & Y � I � f ■ -� alit a ; 2114 va 1 A 3 14, jig n a Y�= t 111E g1pylingp;�1111i i#p, RR�� 10,11 e ��A �9 a f31 R E i@ o 145 al I t� #• • Sul lloi p ep l $ M fig lii-h Pip, ,n en II a C a^a y� ®A I. I + V1 mn J iI I - I: 1AOipYXAMAVFNE - .. gg it t 4q it P R 2 6 ;a xg R I - Is CITY OF pUCL�T COL SHORT PL47S a + / EN—O — /�AL°1G�P °� "'"� DEF.SANITARY SRA"F.R PLAN & PROFILES C5,O1 IYO. REYiSUR �' YTE .WPfl ERR izwi p.[ a I # 5571/H f _ sro rru� r 1 r, 66 w r .SSW2 I e•rax JnJe i 1 �j Fir. .Sill! Crkin® T T [ IX•P JlS1r 4 o 4>•y, w en 4 lie IR 0 !yl a nt, AIR m a 4 C� n � a z u 0 2�� 0 1Rt. j i ' Jlf ++44II it I O �I i J. EX S H - _ e�rcva - � v I. RFMMIIII� ftR ary AFI!'Y' im .as CITY OF PUGET COLONY SHORT PMTS I & 2 RENTON SANITARY SEA'ER NOTES & DETAILS C5.31 air IMP is Rul yps jg1s,'Its 90 its wit Nn us " 0 � q: Me g a- 01 111 "4,4 4� 1 Lj WIN a 1I! hip a y w I �q to 0 �� j iN No, 14 41 Inc 1Nil INN �Af��"R wit E imp will, pit 31 ��� � °lit $ tillm 4 F7-moD 0 cio 1 rjh�to g *l rit ` �o � a � ■# L� I s q d(� 00 N i 11 all �f w lot a•� A 09 I jig Ic I N�am "r CITY OF PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 $C��7 RENTONCOMPOSITE UTILITYPLAN .o1 M, R[vY wiE w k 'A x I i HOQMWALEM • • o I��� 11 A i e Cl 2 `f' d 0 Fn Ilk E W ONWAYNf • ONINNYI; - 00(1I33NIONN .trl?Ily ° °6 orw+wfv� rm wn+ N9lSi0 �� �r� MW AGIYP M YAJTW mz-wFN'7w W"v wm ➢w $' AVOK HMAM Yd fM53H1K�Il1M a � : xlo UVAM orouen31 - rli'�d1�lONS.iAADF0�13�J�dd13AlA�fD.� 1rMJA OWA&W1N/73&d ' 0 R 0 A�l � ati a � VM is:. a3.. '3'N '3AY rivinDOH PC 2 chi b6'LLf 1 III - In ..I ____------------- ___— - ` f i I I DE CJPN9lS�C CNlA iV4 ✓t LI• • DNINNYII •" - ON113iN10N7 %� �� mm Atu,5mww YKirm mml6'31Y Y"r igWi M S3IYOGFIN3NNDa ...... id 5 Nj"w sAw �^�; AWN �- N e� x e MA '3'N '3Av viVInbOH Y6'LZf _ 1 lg a alo ,1 1 I f I I I I I I I I I door, Zf£8{LgY ' ' I I I Q ++ 1 I I ! J IL kR q N 1 I 1 I h I I ! I f I V I I t I I g I I + �I �� I �� iNiI Fl,(yftQy I I I I I + 1 f I V I I N I 1 I I V ! I I I I I I I I d I I I 1 I I c I I .---__--_- 4Mft=A:/It •OMfNN •1� ON1i37N16N7 >om 17p(_11PpW 371 ysrwrni- �+m�reM.�#�N '�3N�eM�!7�1Y�W7ID�l� MlJI47Q % .77I7[/!! Q3/17RW NOD � mo 1wsrrsw rareren J� ]� r� `""••"",,• ""• ,dal„/ T1d7d1dIlA�SM107�0�J�iJY]OdL13A►N� "' ea wwl.�e.� ral l yM � A� r APO Irv" v &n41�r awms3a a � � ley 4Y g] 3 -TN -3nd wvinooH Y6'LZF _. ,. I IG Q9l 3 ,.I *o I `l If I I I I I I i I sae + I I I I I W I v _ Ib+A'r 1rfi8t02Y I ! I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I Q L - % OF 41 r m7 (bJanmtav II Ul a I I I I I f 1 I A[ I I I of 1 I I I Im Il i I f I I r I I I n� 1 jl i a I I —� ell 6.,.PAMOf ONINN,11 OMeYiiNlONi z2 �.a{navWN,18 - 7d5i b E dyb'�/6' 3W ]y!/Y]�I Y�N/],fX�918e� ar�aN N'JN. >0� �3nV/"l Wl�/RN --- gill T1Ei'fidl~AW7WJ3&fAd hZWVW ARrAd�dIS7�1�7.fa1i71/ifiYnlBfd „wA399" lip �yy gQ '3'N •3AV WVInbOH I -----------�---- `ti I I I I I I r I II II j I I i I asacr 3u'.BALtaY I { r ! [ ti .GR7• I i � I _ I r I I i I "= 1 W I viI + lit rho I '�:w'•� � I E � I I I I I i ilf • :: I I • I + { I r I N r I I ui I I + I + I , r ' i I I I I I r I I 1 I I r � I { I -- (OL,rr , Y �3, ONftiA inE flNINN YI! '�NI ii3 Nf'J NJ crinwwr� runwfn N'JISiO "°•••�""••••I• ` ' /0.i16 Am':iM61Al Ai1371H dW .NfS 7N3M[iIY NL9! 9ID S3iVCW M3NAW T16'7dlbFA11S.WO7VOb13'.k�d8I�1VA� .i3f�b47Saa�rdva��oa+ai -Y"V&hW _ ebr�n ii3^Oue 3A S Nfy$W K+Iitl IIYKHI a>.waa. p b i 3 EA a 0 �7oF1 e i 3d d ) AMA— .'3*-,3AW I w � ' Iw fe I I 1 1 I I I d I I I I nl I � 1 I h f ¢ w I I � I I 1 �N -Cow - '1 � � I 1 I 1 II Iry^ 1 S�m h r � "f� pIa I + I 11 v,w,el.orna rs- z¢ I— p-� — ---.- — - - — — — — — _— ------------- ------------------------------- I l I -�v clnr 1\ I W I + ' l � a as orr 3r£a[A7w I I ��• I tj f • � • II I I - I � I I I I 1 f I 1 I + 1 I N I n f`I fow, 4' I ILliflry�Ay I + I i I I I m I � o I W�3 I I wuz 'I{ �a 3'S 3hVLNtQFL r on i.r.am� XWAtUN7N Y�WW6W` 3Jtl3 5,NIdfK1Y '�hvS m .W r,.. 1QW eIV7dI&ONSAW700JSWd113NN00 xv w H 8 Lf Nd7d3dVOSONb7AYVN1N1738dAW I pf a Ito6 � $ y@ 0 33 4 a in it I bss�. am" NY1I 'JNIfi7Nll •J N7 �/��.�, 1y1j]j�g ua»nn uroaa . NOfS30/ RIF �'eS '3w31Y71r 9®7i DN A N b m S3WDHb13NA/DC7 _..._..__ � BMW UT-�,. roa e rr lVMJbK WSAW7W J3" h9WAiW AIVW -:O&Ab MW*'Wd `�'r err �Am*r a ll a ** 19 �6. 3S 3�Y MLLO►l �. erc� ..o, A pNJAOAlnf iOWAM-11/ i'07M I "+•� Z1V'xd18flOVl.�.iNDFOI?J3+.3j►�d dOA/NY00 4945cs 7 v V7dJagar e�iww ` u,a R d x IN ' 97 _ .. . p Ci s. 3"'311tl WVIf100H 96'9lSl I W i I I I I I Offal i.liil.OVJ' li Ci I 3C i r______ ------ W� h I I I I p m O qq I „ Ze e CL E i d ♦ � I IF W�s d _J ai r � f!7 20 r� I 1 i I I i I �o I I --------------- 1 i I oho ______--- _ ffdl L , I '3'S '3/SV H10ti4 ..., — ` (`-+� � ONOANAVIS ' ONlNNY,■ - 9HIraa Nf•JNa N9193O I� errwllsw Asrsrie MW AVl3W6W `J91jTy$ Z�A7 Z'Ab''3A' 31Y NN79N H 3NNW �H hi:tl T3YlUM a�onaa. 3� ._...-_ �°•, •�"•,�•`""003 S16'xd1111�IIS.WO7�13'JYIId df3A9MOd .L3A"J#AfV&VO"V.I1/6i7A9'VO "'°$' ,aarac+ac„o uro WIN e� gg� '3'N '31,V INVII*OH ®i;-` _ S691C1 3.1s,8 tooN_ z I q0 w zK I od I e • I I I• I I I , r � r I 1 I 1 7 I - f� I I I I � I I • �w> €qQ I I • I f a � I I �a a I I ______- r ___ _ oli to Iry . I I'S '3AV Mott r y� Y b WNy — 4 I I I I I I I •oc 3.es,ewuN � Iiooc �I I x SOLI m aCE n a a.a 0 M 0■ GGeS �OXIArArnr r�� � � �nlw.n r. arlr. ewr �� �" O&W hmow6pl'ZKYW AV arm '3#Y"v mm OF 3J 3A913SYfJMW t11r'7Id.L�FDfiShcYil7�liA�dlliA91�VR� A'M'xd�dipSOW7AEfd �, �„„y a � � b 11 E2q � b Q � Ili r�• i3'�1$ ist 8 n a r� INfARAVIF • ONINNYII OMf777 NlONl PM A0tow6w 3%?TM tw3l3 '7w yN IY om 9m 3✓ r�51 N1K3711N �r I SiW�H rJ3NN0.7 7' ewrwlewre�nrcb '�� a.,we I R Ia A Y -------- r + l 5 I I I B I I � + I I a I I � I I I I I I I � I I I I �a I II � II 1 I I I i I I I I I 1 I , I i I I I I I I I I I I I j I i + I a f I $ + I I I I I I I I ld/.hw I I p G'tell, + II f � I I : J I + I + tl I I � I I I I I I I I I I I A I+ ti 1 I +� r I i I II I I i i I � b s I — i '35 ')1Y HL011 � A 1A a Cory & Cindy Brandt 3038 198th Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 (owner) Dave Jordan 4902 2nd SE Renton, WA 98059 (party of record) Karen & F-Jay Cook 4910 NE 1st Court Renton, WA 98059 tel: (425) 226-1437 (party of record) PARTIES OF RECORD PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 LUA06-146, SHPL-H Robert & Cheryl Vangeystel 25507 75th Avenue SW Vashon, WA 98070 (owner) Shannon & Doug Luedtke 4914 SE 2nd Street Renton, WA 98059 tel: (425) 227-6539 (party of record) John Skochdopole Conner Homes 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (applicant) Brian Westerbeck PO Box 1767 Renton, WA 98057 (party of record) ste: #202 Updated: 12/27/06 (Page 1 of 1) 11 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT D ;. M E M Q R A N D U M DATE: April 8, 2011 TO: Carrie Olson, Engineering Specialist - CED FROM: c ft�rcndy Moya, Records Management Specialist SUBJECT: Returned Recorded Documents: Bill of Sale - #20110124000049 (Puget Colony SP 1 & 2 — Classic Concepts V, LLQ The attached document has been recorded with King County and is being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest. The original will be retained by the City Clerk's Office. Thank you. Attachment cc: LUA-06-146 LUA-06-147 b:\citycierkvecords specialisticorrespondence & memos - cindylrecorded documentslbill of sale - olson.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 11111111111111111111111 20110124000048 CITY OF RENTON 65 63.00 PAGE-001 OF 002 01/24/2011 09:13 KING COUNTY, UP BILL OF SALE I Proj Name: Puget Colony SP 1&2 Property TO Parcel Number: In dedicated ROW Project File 4: 5`54 j 0 Street Intersection: In SE 2d Place from Address: Hoquiam Ave. west 619 feet. In SE 2°a Street from Hoquiam 224 feet west. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Classic concepts V LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. The Grantor, as named above, for, and in consideration of mutual benefits, hereby grants, bargains, sells and delivers to the Grantee, as named above, the following described personal property: WATER SYSTEM: Lenpth Size Tyne L.F. of DI Water Main L.F. of Water Main L.F. of Water Main each of Gate Valves each of Gate Valves each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: LenLqh Size Tyne L.F. of " DI Sewer Main 843 L_F. of 8 PVC Sewer Main L.F. of PVC Sewer Main 3 each of 48 Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Lift Stations STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Lengb Size Tyne 163 L.F. of 12 " DI Storm Main 331 L.F_ of 12 CPE Storm Main L.F_ of Storm Main 1 each of Type 1 Storm Inlet/Outlet 4 each of Type 1 Storm Catch Basin each of Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS (Including Curb -Gutter, Sidewalk, Asphalt Pavement) Curb -Gutter, Sidewalk 408 L.F. By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators and assigns forever. C:1Wayne7slconncr plauTugetlPuget Colony bill of sale.doclwJ Page 1 IN WITNESS OF, sai Grantor has caused this instruunent to be executed this/ day of 201 INDIVIDUAL FORAdOFACKNOWLEDGMEA7 Notary Sea] must be within box STATE OF WASEENGTON } SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that W: �k �e-ay, , W e �� �s p err a,, -,"� r- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the Siate of Washington Notary (Print) _ Pr My appointment expires: f-Nvkcr c,.sk act �2 Dated: -Lo\ REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF AC%NOWLEDGhIENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument, on path. stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print.) My appointment expires: Dated: -- CORPORATEFORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHI NGTON ) SS - COUNTY OF ICING ) On this day of , 20_, before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public is and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: 0AFon=\P$PWIBILLSALE2.EK)Mbh Page 2 10 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D ��f�� , AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT �J M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 19, 2011 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk's Office FROM: Carrie K. Olson, Plan Review x7235 SUBJECT: PUGET COLONY II SHORT PLAT LUA06-146-SHPL Attached please find two sets of the above -referenced original mylars and three paper copies of the mylar for recording with King County. The recording instructions in order are as follows: 1. Record the short plat mylars. 2. Request King County to return one of the executed mylars to us for our records. Please have the Courier take these documents via 8-hour service. A check in the amount of $15.81 made out to Champion Couriers is attached. According to Finance, the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings should be charged -to account #000000.007.559.60.49.003. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Cc: Kayren Kittrick (Notice of Recording) Jan Conklin Yellow File iaplanreviewlcolsonlshortplats 201l%puget colony ii shpl 09m clerkrecord new format -doe COMMUNITY ECONOMIC � o �f DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 18, 2011 TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Department FROM: Carrie Olson, Development Services, Plan Review SUBJECT: PUGET COLONY II SHORT PLAT- WA06-146-SHPL The Department of Community and Economic Development has reviewed and recommended approval of the Puget Colony II Short Plat. Requirements and conditions have been fulfilled and fees paid. Two original Mylar drawings are attached and are submitted for your review and signature. Please return mylars to me for recording. Thank you. cc: Yellow File lU:1PIanReview\COLSON15hortplats 20101Puget Colony 11 SHPL 07m ZimSign New Format.doc ° ienE �)M City of COMMUNITY &ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 11, 2011 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review ROUTE TO: Kayren Kittrick, Plan Revie FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review SUBJECT: Puget Colony it Short Plat, LUA-06--146-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachments included: Short Plat drawings Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmerman as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat Mylar. Status Of: Accepted Related Proiect #s Comments NA d d As-Builts V Cost Data Inventory Bill of Sale v Easements (Water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) V Deed of Dedication Square Footage: Restrictive Covenants Maintenance Bond d Release Permit Bond Comments: Kittrick Arneta Henninger Cc: Yellow File i:lplanreviewlwlsonlshortplats 20101puget colony ii shpl 07m pi-ts reviewstartnewformat,doc C-t of SQ. COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DQ� DEVELOPMENT M E M D R A N D U M DATE: December 27, 2010 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review ROUTE TO: Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review SUBJECT: Puget Colony II Short Plat, LUA- 6--146-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachments included: • Short Plat drawings Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmerman as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat Mylar. Status Of: Accepted Related Project #s Comments NA As -guilts Cost Data Inventory Bill of Sale Easements (Water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) '2 Deed of Dedication Square Footage: Restrictive Covenants Maintenance Bond Release Permit Bond Comments: Approval: Date: Kayren Kittrick Arneta Henninger Cc: Yellow File i:%planreviewlcolsonlshortplats 20 tD%puget colony ii slip] 06m pr-ts mviewstartnewformat.doc COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC chtr4f ��:. DEVELOPMENT t ,�c: M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 2, 2010 TO: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review ROUTE TO: Kayren Kittrick, Plan Review FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Revie SUBJECT: Puget Colony II Short Plat, L 6--146-SHPL Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced short plat. If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. Attachments included: • Revised Short Plat Certificate • Lot Closures Short Plat drawings Also provide the following information requested by Gregg Zimmerman as requirement of project closeout and signing of short plat Mylar. Status Of: Accented Related Proiect #s Comments NA V V As-Builts Cost Data Inventory Bill of Sale Easements (Water, Sewer, Utilities, Hydrant, etc.) �! Deed of Dedication Square Footage: V Restrictive Covenants Sidew I M e in lieu of has not been collet r t e fges calculated correctly under L -0 ? Have the fees increased? Maintenance Bond Release Permit Bond Comments :_V_1)_. ell��. ' Approval: Date: Kayren Kittrick Arneta Henninger Cc: Yellow File i:l lanr vie%v\collon\shortplats 20101pt get colony ii shpl O lm pr-ts reviews rtnewformat.doc ���e COMMUNITY &ECONOMIC 11111� �_Sn DEVELOPMENT Ile M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 2, 2010 TO: Bob MacOnie, Technical Services FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review (� �) SUBJECT: Puget Colony II Short Plat, LUA-06-146-SHPL and Legal Review Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced short plat. The following attachments are enclosed for your review: • Revised Short Plat Certificate • Lot Closures • Short Plat drawings If all review concerns have been addressed, please sign below or return your comments as needed. Thanks. 1` c 1 Approval: L NJ Robert T MacOnie, Jr. Cc: Yellow File i:\planrevicw\coison\shortplats2010lpuget colony ii Apt 01 m pr-is reviewstart newformat.doc V_/� it —� I � 1 Date: ► �� zc'ku k COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 27, 2010 TO: Jerry Wasser, Planning /"A� FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan RevieW{// t SUBJECT: Puget Colony II Short Plat, LUA-06-146-SHPL Attached is the LUA folder for the short plat. We are in the final review stage of recording this short plat. If you find any short plat requirements that have not been properly addressed, please let me know. Please return comments and folder to me so I can proceed to final recording. Thanks. • Mitigation fees of $3,617.25 will be paid prior to recording. Fee -in -lieu of street improvements will be recalculated by Arneta Henninger upon her review. • SAD and SDC fees have been paid. • Demo Permit not required. • There are no critical areas onsite. • The latest short plat drawing is attached for your review. • The latest landscape drawing is attached for your approval. • PMT's will be provided with signed mylars. Approval: Wasser, Planning 1AP1anReviewlC0LSQMShortplats 20101Puget Colony 11 Sl1PL 05m PlanningRevimdoc Date: a a /c-��/CD DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D City of AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 28, 2010 TO: Carrie Olson FROM: Gerald C. Wasse�o SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat 2, LUA06-146 conducted a landscape inspection in the field on the above -captioned project today. The planting materials have been installed in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan dated December 27, 2010. hacedlplanninglcurrent planning\gwlfinal plat memosipuget colony shpl 2 landscape inspection.doc DATE: COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 6a� v6 M E M D R A N D U M December 27, 2010 TO: Jan Conklin, Development Services FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review CD SUBJECT: Puget Colony II Short Plat, LUA-06-146-SHPL A copy of the above mentioned short plat is attached for your information. If you have comments or changes in addressing, please let me know, iaplanreviewlcolsonlshortplats 20101puget colony ii slip] 04m jan c. reviewstart newformat.doc t Department of Community and Economic Development December 15, 2010 Alex Pietsch,Administrator Wayne Jones. Classic Concept V, LLC P.O. Box 146 Renton WA 98057 SUBJECT: Pacific Colony II Short Plat, LUA-06-146-SHPL Dear Mr. Jones: The review submittal on the above -mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. Please review these comments and make the necessary changes. Once changes have been completed please resubmit three copies of the short plat drawings and three. copies of any other related documents. SHORT PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS: (These items are required to be completed prior to recording of the short plat.) 1. The submitted landscape plan is conceptual in that it does not identify specific species of trees and other planting materials. The applicant must submit a final landscape plan for review and approval prior to recording the short plat. 2. The City of Renton Administrator of the Public Works Department (note the department name change) is city official who signs this short plat; update the City of Renton signature block. 3. Rename the "DEDICATION/CERTIFICATION" block title to "OWNER'S CERIFICATION." 4. It is my understanding that Stephen J. Scheri, PLS is no longer in the employ of Core Design and therefore will not be the stamping and signing surveyor. The Surveyor's Certificate, signature line and stamp need to be changed to that of the actual stamping surveyor. . 5. On sheet 2 of 2 the quarter corner common to Sections 15 & 16 is incorrectly noted as "Renton Control Point No. 78" when it is actual "No. 478." 6. The new lot addresses can be found on the attached; note said addresses.on the short plat drawing. 7. The latest short plat certificate submitted, Oct 13, 2010, indicates the property is vested in Classic Concepts V, LLC. Please update the owner's name on Page 1 of 2. 1:1P1anAevieMC0LS0N%Shortp1ats 20101Puget Colony I1 SHPL 03L Change RequestStop.doc Renton City Hail * 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Page 2 December 16, 2010 The attached memo from Arneta Henninger, dated December 2, 2010, indicates additional documentation to be provided to complete this project. Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact meat (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review E-mailed To: kjv@coredesigninc.com Cc: Yellow File (LUA06-146-SHPL) W m N Illj l �11 ----- 1 S'�---"— --- —LL-- ---- , i i l 1 I I R&ri —__ L__„J --------- _��___ Ff ____—_---w--1 1� r J 1 e$� gyf �Y p 3 S M C of G'QE�%�Iir2 !?R�f�1A�'SHOf7T�TCaE . wMelyi � DESIGN 2NG„Itealyp. P11MN,kC• iva•Irnlie " _ KMI�`IMAfE.IfL i1hG�7 Ii91E11f 110�+e6'JIIVI 4'1%►!t SA1G1S lF. _ _ Printed: 01-18-2011 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions. RECEIPT Permit#: LUA06-146 01/18/2011 01:47 PM Total Payment: 8,682.55 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee 5045 304.000000.009.345 Fire Mitigation-SFR 5050 305.000000.016.344 Traffic Mitigation Fee Receipt Number: R1100175 Payee: CLASSIC CONCEPTS V, LLC Amount ---------------- 2, 653.80 2,440.00 3,588.75 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 9491 6,682.55 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.•000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat .00 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD .00 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone .00 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence .00 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees .00 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5045 304.000000.009.345 Fire Mitigation-SFR .00 5050 305.000000.016.344 Traffic Mitigation Fee .00 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE - USE 3954 .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax .00 Printed: 01-18-2011 Payment Made: [TY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Utility Services Permit RECEIPT Permit#: U070104 07/12/2007 03:11 PM Total Payment: 2,468.48 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Receipt Number: Payee: CONNER HOMES CO Trans Account Code Description Amount ------ 4033 ------------------ 407.000000.018.343 ------------------------------ ---------------- Stormwater Insp Approval 331.20 4042 406.000000.018.343 Sewer Inspection Approvl 2,137.28 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- -------- --------------------------- --------------- Payment Check #58970 2,468.48 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 4028 000.000000.007.343 Public Works Inspection .00 4033 407.000000.018.343 Stormwater Insp Approval .00 4040 426,000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Sewer .00 4042 406.000000.018.343 Sewer Inspection Approvl .00 4044 406.000000.018.322 Sewer Permit -00 4045 426.000000.018.388 Spec Assmt Dist, Sewer .00 4050 000.000000.007.322 Right-of-way Constructn .00 4056 425.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect Water .00 4057 405.000000.018.343 Water Inspection Approvl .00 4059 405.000000.018.388 Misc. Water Installation .00 4061 407.000000.018,322 Storm Water Permits .00 4069 427.000000.018.388 Spec Util Connect 5tormw .00 4074 000.000000.007.341 Latecommer Admin Fees .00 5025 000.000000.007.322 Street Lighting Fee .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 R0703555 Department of Community and Economic Development January 14, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator Wayne Jones Classic Concept V, LLC P.D. Box 146 Renton WA 98057 SUBJECT: Pacific Colony II Short Plat, LUA-06-146-SHPL Dear Mr. Jones: The review submittal on the above -mentioned short plat has been completed and the following comments have been returned. SHORT PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS: (These items are required to be completed prior to recording of the short plat.) 1. Provide a set of PMT's of the final drawings. 2. Pay the Transportation, Park and Fire Mitigation Fees in the amount of $8,682.55 for 5 lots under LUA06-146 made payable to the City of Renton. These fees may be paid at the Customer Services Counter on the 6th floor of Renton City Hall. When the above item is completed, you may submit the signed and notarized short plat mylars (one original Mylar and one copy (on Mylar) of each sheet) along with a check in the amount of $15.81(current courier fee) made out to Champion Couriers. Should you need to discuss any portion of this letter please contact me at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review. E-mailed To: kiv(@coredesieninc.com rhs(@coredesip,ninc.com Cc: City Clerk's File (LUA06-146-SHPL) LTIankevieMCOLSOMShortplats 20111Puget Colony II SHPL 08L RequmMylarStop.doc Renton City Hall • 1055.South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY City ofY e AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT11,111111 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 6, 2010 TO: Carrie Olson FROM: Bob Mac Onie x-7369 SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat II, LUA-06-146-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The City of Renton Administrator of the Public Works Department (note the department name change) is city official who signs this short plat; update the City of Renton signature block. Rename the "DEDICATION / CERTIFICATION" block title to "OWNER'S CERIFICATION." It is my understanding that Stephen J. Scheri, PLS is no longer in the employ of Core Design and therefore will not be the stamping and signing surveyor. The Surveyor's Certificate, signature line and stamp need to be changed to that of the actual stamping surveyor. On sheet 2 of 2 the quarter corner common to Sections 15 & 16 is incorrectly noted as "Renton Control Point No. 78" when it is actual "No. 478." The new lot addresses can be found on the attached; note said addresses on the short plat drawing. y//j .... r f Y g e �� ha#ile sysllnd - land subdivision & surveying recordsllnd-20 - short plats104741rv101206.doc � 1 • 14711 NE 29Th Place, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 • Ph 425.885.7877 Fx 425.885.7963 • www.coredesigninc.com DATE: 12/22/10 CORE PROJECT NO: 06124 REFERENCE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 & 2 TO: City of Renton ATTN: Carrie Olson ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way 6th Floor Renton, WA 98055 FROM: Rob Stevens SENDING VIA: ❑ MAIL ❑ PICK-UP ❑ HAND DELIVER El COURIER ❑1-HR ® 2-HR ❑ 4-HR ❑ OVERNIGHT QUANTITY DATED DESCRIPTION 3 Landscape plans 1 Comment letter responses TRANSMITTED: ACTION REQUIRED: COMMENTS: X4 ® FOR YOUR USE ❑ PER YOUR REQUEST ❑ INFORMATION ONLY M PROCESSING ❑ REPLY ❑ RETURN ❑ NONE BY: Rob S�en.E. CITY OErVE RECID DEC 2 2 2010 BUILDING D;VISION • 14711 NE 29Th Place, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98007 • Ph 425.885.7877 Fx 425.885.7963 • www.coredesigninc.com DATE: 12/22/10 CORE PROJECT NO: 06124 REFERENCE: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 & 2 TO: City of Renton ATTN: Carrie Olson ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way 6th Floor Renton, WA 98055 FROM: Rob Stevens SENDING VIA: ❑ MAIL ❑ PICK-UP ❑ HAND DELIVER El COURIER ❑1-HR ® 2-HR ❑ 4-HR ❑ OVERNIGHT QUANTITY DATED DESCRIPTION 3 Landscape plans 1 Comment letter responses TRANSMITTED: ACTION REQUIRED: COMMENTS: X4 ® FOR YOUR USE ❑ PER YOUR REQUEST ❑ INFORMATION ONLY M PROCESSING ❑ REPLY ❑ RETURN ❑ NONE BY: Rob S�en.E. CITY OErVE RECID DEC 2 2 2010 BUILDING D;VISION December 22, 2010 Core Project No. 06124 Carrie K. Olson Development Services, Plan Review 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 SUBJECT: Pacific Colony Short Plat 1&2, LUA-06•147•SHPL Dear Carrie, In response to your comments please find 3 copies of the requested documents. The submitted landscape plan is conceptual in that it does not identify specific species of trees and other planting materials. In addition to the required landscaping, 3 replacement trees (that is replacement trees for those significant trees removed) must also be shown. The applicant must submit a final landscape plan for review and approval prior to recording the short plat. Response: Please find attached 3 copies of the requested landscape plans. 2. The City of Renton Administrator of the Public Works Department (note the department name change) is city official who signs this short plat; update the City of Renton signature block. Response: Signature block updated 3. Rename the "DEDICATION/CERTIFICATION" block title to "OWNER'S CERIFICATION." Response: Block title renamed 4. It is my understanding that Stephen J. Schrei, PLS is no longer in the employ of Core Design and therefore will not be the stamping and signing surveyor. The Surveyor's Certificate, signature line and stamp need to be changed to that of the actual stamping surveyor. Response: The surveyor's certificate has been correct It 5. On sheet 2 of 2 the quarter corner common to Sections 15 & is incorrectly noted as "Renton Control Point No. 70' when it is actual "No. 47Si " Response: Corner point corrected. i 6. The new lot addresses can be found on the attached; note said addresses on the short plat drawing. Response: Addresses have been added 7. The latest short plat certificate submitted, Oct 13, 2010, indicates the property is vested in Classic Concepts V, LLC. Please update the owner's name on Page 1 of 2. Response: Owners name updated The attached memo from Arneta Henninger, dated December 2, 2010, indicates additional documentation to be provided to complete this project. Response: Asbuilts have been submitted to Arneta. Please let us know if there are any additional comments. You can contact me at 425.885.7877. Sincerely, Core esign, Inc. Robert H. Stevens, P.E. Principal; Senior Project Manager NA20061061241Docs106124Ltr05 C Renton-resLbnittai.do,- COMMUNITY &ECONOMIC Q �� DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 27, 2010 TO: Jan Conklin, Development Services FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review SUBJECT: Puget Colony II Short Plat, LUA-06-146-SHPL A copy of the above mentioned short plat is attached for your information. If you have comments or changes in addressing, please let me know. i:lplanreviewlcolsonlshortplats 20101puget colony ii shpl 041nian c, reviewstart newformat.doe i DEPARTMENT DE COMMUNITY D ����� AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M ID R A N D U M DATE: December 14, 2010 TO: Carrie Olson FROM: Gerald C. Wasser SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat 2, LUA06-146 I reviewed the submittal for recording Puget Colony Short Plat 1. The submitted landscape plan is conceptual in that it does not identify specific species of trees and other planting materials. The applicant must submit a final landscape plan for review and approval prior to recording the short plat. bAcedlplanninglcurrent planning\gwVinal plat memos\pugct colony shill 2 comments.doc L t.r CaMMlJNITY& �ity0f ', �� ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT •:ft' M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 7, 2010 TO: Jerry Wasser, Planning FROM: Carrie Olson, Plan Review 0'P SUBJECT: Puget Colony II Short Plat, WA-06-146-SHPL Attached is the LUA folder for the short plat. We are in the final review stage of recording this short plat. If you find any short plat requirements that have not been properly addressed, please let me know. Please return comments and folder to me so I can proceed to final recording. Thanks. • Mitigation fees of $8,682.55 will be paid prior to recording. Fee -in -lieu of street improvements will be recalculated by Arneta Henninger upon her review. • SAD and SDC fees have been paid. • Demo Permit not required. • There are no critical areas onsite. • The latest landscape drawing is attached for your approval. • PMT's will be provided with signed mylar5. Approval: Jerry Wasser, Planning Cc: Yellow File 1APIanRevicMC0LS0N\Shor1plats 2010\Puget Colony 11 SHPL Ulm PlanningReview.doe Date: DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. A I square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets" Private access easements" Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2from line i for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: D square feet square feet square feet 2. O square feet 3. Y 3 7 square feet 4. , acres 5. units/lots 6. = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. City Of Renton Planning Division NOV 2 3 4vlo R:IPWIDEVSERVIForms%Planningldensity.doc t u dated: 11/08/2004 1 am ECown O TITLE INSURANCE COWAN y 3400 COLOX81A CMTER, 761 STH AVE SECOND CERTIFICATE SPATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: :12 2 5 6 01 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Berk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that t e title to the following descnbed land situate in said KING County, to -wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: CLASSIC CONCEPTS V, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY EXCEPTIONS: SHE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $2 0 0. 00 TAX: $ 17.60 Records examined to October 13, 2010 at 8 - 0 0 A _ M_ f CMCACrO TIT"I.E INSURANCE COMPANY MIKE HARRTS Title Officer (206)628-5623 City of Renton Planning Division NOV .�; 3 :"Jld C f VE9VIED SM ATA/1L5.9n/sK t L O TITLE INSURANCE COMPA2� Order No.: 12 2 5 6 01 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 54 AND 55, PUGET COLONY HOPES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 86 OF PLATS, PAGE 59, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CHICAGO TfrLE LNSUR4NCI' CONTANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 122 5 6 01 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appea * in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acgi"res for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit fends, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as unposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. 1. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT TH9 LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). sar�xe/�2ma/� CMCACso TYRE INSURANCE COMPANY O TITLE INSURANCE COMPAI, Order Na: 12 2 5 6 01 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A �OVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE PLAT. OF PUPET COLONY HOMES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 86 OF` PLATS, PAGE 59, IN ICING COUNTY, WASEINGTON_ a 2`'EA5EMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: 5 FEET PARALLEL AND ADJACENT TO THE ROAD FRONTAGE RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 10, 1968 RECORDING NUMBER: 6404210 c aRESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEER FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIOPS THEREOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND THE RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO sudH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. RECORDING NUMBER: 79509 n 4 CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 4612, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: JUNE 21, 1996 RECORDING NUMBER: 960821096E REGARDING:. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AD 5. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20070424900018, AS FOLLOWS_ FENCE SITS FROM 0.4 FEET TO 0.57 FEET WESTERLY OF THE WEST LIVE OF LOT 54. ax 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID C�N NOVEMBER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Ar Aix O TITLE INSURANCE COMPASS Order Noa . 1225601 SNORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continu6d) EXCEPTIONS 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND - ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES AFFECTS: LOT 54 2010 692800-0540-03 2146 $ 25,000-00 -.. $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 290.71 PAID: $ 290.71 UNPAID: $ 0.00 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID Ok NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED 'VALUE-IMPROVEMEN`.CS : GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: LOT 55 2010 692800-0550-00 2146 $ 25,000.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 290.71 PAID: $ 290.71 UNPAID: $ 0.00 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR CLASSIC CONCEPTS V, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. r 9. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS CERTIFICATE IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AMID THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DBFINiD HEREIN. THE PARTIES MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. a NOTE 1: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RdW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: LOTS 54-55, VOL 86 OF PLATS, PG 59. SaIATb3/12-iaA0/M CMCAGO TT F INSURANCE COMPANY ` 70 TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN Order Nq.: 1225601 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS END OF SCHEDULE 8 s�ra't�/ta�a9u/� CMCA.GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT II CORE PROJECT NO. 06124 Plat Map Checks 08/20/07 SJS Core Design, Inc. 14711 N.E. 29"' Place, #101 Bellevue, WA 98007 425-885-7877 City of Renton Planning Division RECE#W'E a LOT BLK 1 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING FASTING 2 178349.55 1313956.80 N 00031'45" E 160.00 3014 178509.54 1313958.27 S 88029'12" E 42.01 505 178508.43 1314000.27 S 88029'12" E 264.86 507 178301.43 1314265.04 S 00°18'51" W 130.00 508 178371.43 1314264.33 S 00018,51" W 30.01 3015 178341.43 1314264.16 N 88029'12" W 307.47 2 178349.55 1313956.80 Closure Error Distance> 0.0015 Error Bearing> S 20°24134" W Closure Precision> 1 in 613502.9 Total Distance> 934.34 LOT AREA: 49139 SQ FT OR 1.1281 ACRES LOT BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# BEARING DISTANCE nORTHING EASTING 505 178508.43 1314000.27 S 88029112" E 264.86 507 178501.43 1314265.04 S 00018,511, W 130.00 508 178371.43 1314264.33 N 88029'12" W 245.69 514 178377.92 1314018.72 RADIUS: 20.00 LENGTH: 31.07 CHORE: 28.04 DELTA: 89000'57" CHORD BRG: N 43°58'44" W PC-R: N 01030'48" E PT-R: S 89028'15" E RADIUS POINT: 516 178397.92,1314019.25 TANGENT: 19.66 515 178398.10 1313999.25 N 00031'45" E 110.33 505 178508.43 1314000.27 Closure Error Distance> 0.0021 Erro-r Bearing> N 40029'42" E Closure Precision> 1 in 381376.4 Total Distance> 781.96 LOT AREA: 34374 SQ FT OR 0.7891 ACRES BLOCK 1 TOTAL AREA: 117887 SQ FT OR 2.7063 ACRES Lot Report 8/20/2007 08:09 Lot File: P:\2006\06124\Carlson\Lot Files\SP 2.1ot CRD File> P:\2006\06124\Carlson\06124.crd LOT 1 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING 3012 178376.82 1314060,51 N 88029112" W 41.81 514 178377.92 1314018.72 RADIUS: 20.00 LENGTH: 31.07 CHORD: 28.04 DELTA: 89000157" CHORD BRG: N 43058'44" W PC-R: N 01030'48" E PT-R: S 89028'15" E RADIUS POINT: 516 178397.92,1314019.25 TANGENT: 19.66 515 178398.10 1313999.25 N 00031'45" E 110.33 505 178508.43 1314000.27 S 88029'12" E 60.98 3013 178506.82 1314061.22 S 00018151" W 130.00 3012 178376.82 1314060.51 Closure Error Distance> 0.0021 Error 3earing> N 40029'42" E Closure Precision> 1 in 182494.2 Total Distance> 374.18 LOT AREA: 7874 SQ FT OR 0.1808 ACRES LOT 2 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# SEARING DISTANCE NORTHING 3010 178375.47 N 88029'12" W 50.97 3012 178376.82 N 00018'51" E 130.00 3013 178506.82 S 88029'12" E 50.97 3011 178505.47 S 00018,51" W 130.00 3010 178375.47 Closure Error Distance> 0.0000 Total Distance> 361.95 LOT AREA: 6625 SQ FT OR 0.1521 ACRES EASTING 1314111.46 1314060.51 1314061.22 1314112.18 1314111.46 LOT 3 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING 3008 178374.13 1314162.42 N 88029'12" W 50.97 3010 178375.47 1314111.46 N 00018'51" E 130.00 3011 118505.47 1314112.18 S 88029'12" E 50.97 3009 178504.12 1314163.13 S 00018,51" W 130.00 3008 178374.13 1314162.42 Closure Error Distanced 0.0000 Total Distance> 361.95 LOT AREA: 6625 SQ FT OR 0.1521 ACRES LOT 4 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: L0T PNT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING 3006 178372.78 1314213.37 N 88029'12" W 50.97 3008 178374.13 1314162.42 N 00018'51" E 130.00 3009 178504.12 1314163.13 S 88029'12" E 50.97 3007 178502.78 1314214.09 S 00018,51" W 130.00 3006 178372.78 1314213.37 Closure Error Distance> 0.0000 Total Distance> 361.95 LOT AREA: 6625 SQ FT OR 0.1521 ACRES Loot Report 8/2,,, 2007 08:10 Lot File: P:\2006\06124\Carlson\Lot Files\SP 2.1ot CRD File> P:\2006\06124\Car1son\06124.crd LOT 5 OF BLOCK 1, TYPE: LOT PUT# BEARING DISTANCE NORTHING EASTING 508 178371.43 1314264.33 N 88029'12" W 50.97 3006 178372.78 1314213.37 N 00018,51" E 130.00 3007 178502.78 1314214.09 S 88029'12" E 50.97 507 178501.43 1314265.04 S 00018,511, W 130.00 508 178371.43 1314264.33 Closure Error Distance> 0.0000 Total Distance> 361.94 LOT AREA: 6625 SQ FT OR 0.1521 ACRES Denis Law rr Mayor CItY 01._-" :. yl May G, 2010 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Jennifer M. Wolf Steiner DOUGLAS 100 W Main Street #7 Tustin, CA 92780 SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Project's Period of Validity Puget Colony Short Plat 2 / City of Renton File LUA06-146, SHPL-H Dear Ms. Wolf: This letter is sent in response to your request for an extension of the above referenced project's approved period of validity. Under Ordinance No. 5452 (RMC 4-1-080F) authorization has been given to the Planning Director to approve an additional two-year extension beyond the standard extensions possible under the Code for any land use or subdivision project that was valid on or after. April 1, 2009'. We understand that you are still working to complete this project and will require additional time. Therefore, your request for the two-year extension under Ordinance No. 5452 is hereby granted. You now have until May 14, 2011 to record this project. You should be aware this is a one-time only extension and the project is not recorded by the new expiration date it will become null and void and you will need to resubmit all application materials. I hope this extension. meets your needs and that your project can be completed. You may call Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294 if you have any further questions. Sincerely, C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: Chris Willis - Bank of America / Owner(s) City of Renton File No. LUA06-146 . Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Kayren Kittrick, Plan Reviewer Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 9 rentonwa.gov Steiner April 27, 2010 D 0 U G L A S p'ty Of Renton Planning Division Chip Vincent MAY Pianning Director 31910 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way iecew Renton, Washington 98057 RE: Puget Colony Short Plat 2, LUA06-146, SHPL-H — Request for Extension Dear Mr. Vincent, On December 16, 2009, Bank of America took ownership of the approved preliminary short plat, Puget Colony Short Plat 2 through the recordation of a Trustee's Deed (20091216000879). Additionally, on January 15, 2010, the Bank quit claimed (201000115000378) the property to Quality Properties Asset Management Company (QPAMC), a branch of Bank of America. Finally, Steiner DOUGLAS was hired as the asset manager for Bank of America and QPAMC. The purpose of this letter is to formally request a two (2) year extension to the approved preliminary short plat, Puget Colony Short Plat 2, per Ordinance No. 5452 and your letter dated June 17, 2009. The Bank is currently working with a local real estate broker to market and sell the asset to a qualified developer who will then take over the entitlements for Puget Colony Short Plat 2. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 949.981.4534 or iwolfCcD-steinerdouglas.com. Sincerely, 4enZior nifer M. Wolf Project Manager cc: Chris Willis, VP Asset Manager, OREO Real Estate Sales, Bank of America 100 West Main Street, Suite 7 Tustin, CA 92780 Phone (714) 231-0704 Fax (714) 368-5998 From: Willis, Chris[mailto:chris.willis@bankofamerica.com] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:41 PM To: DSteiner@Steinerpouglas.com Subject: Authorization Letter To Whom it Concerns: Steiner Douglas has been hired by Bank of America to review property information pertaining to properties commonly known as — Conner — Laurelhurst, Conner Puget Colony. Thank you, Chris Willis Vice President/ Asset Manager Bank of America, N.A. OREO Real Estate Sales 600 Anton, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 71.4.327.4557 Email: chris.willis@bankofamerica.com Property List: www.bankofamerica.reo.com Ji John Skochdopole Conner Homes 846108th Avenue NE ste: #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Expiration period for Puget Colony Short Plat 2 City of Renton File LUA06-146, SHPL-H Hear Mr. Skochdopole: The City of Renton Council approved the above referenced application on May 14, 2007. This approval is ordinarily good for two (2) year(s). Pursuant to RMC 4-7-OSOM of the Renton Municipal Code, you may upon written request, prior to the expiration of the project, receive a single one (1)- year extension from the Planning Division. In addition to the above one (1)-year extension, the City Council under Ordinance No. 5452 (enclosed), has granted an extension of the period of validity on land use and subdivision approvals. Therefore, certain land use and/or subdivision approvals expiring after April 1, 2009, upon written request and prior to the expiration of the project, may receive an additional one-time two (2)-year extension beyond the standard expiration date listed in RMC 4-8 and RMC 4-9. Because your project was initially approved on May 14, 2007, and was valid as of April 1, 2009 , you may submit a written request for the standard extension the project would normally receive under RMC 4-7, RMC 4-8, and RMC 4-9, as well as request the additional two (2)-year extension under Ordinance No. 5452. Please be aware that this extension does not apply to temporary use permits, building permits, or public works permits. Also, this provision shall automatically expire on December 31, 2010, and shall be removed from the code at that time unless another ordinance is passed extending this date. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294. Sincerel , C. E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director Enclosure: Copy of ordinance 95452 cc: City of Renton File No. L€1A06-146, SHPL-H Cory & Cindy Brandt, Robert & Cheryl Vangeystel / Owner(s) Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Neil Watts, Development Services Director Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor Renton City Hall • 10S5 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov city of Renton P4arining Division C 0 N N E R June 16, 2009 C.E. Vincent Planning Director City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98057 R: Request for Extensions Dear Mr. Vincent, Conner Homes, LLC submits this request for a one year standard extension and the additional two year extensiorf for our Puget Colony Short Plat 1, Renton file LUA06-147, SHPL-A and Puget Colony Short Plat 2, Renton file LUA06-146, SHPL-H . Thank you for your notice regarding this matter. S perrr Conner Homes, LLC 846 108th Avenue NE Rellevue, Washington 98004 425 455 9280 www. con n e rho rn es. co rn Denis Law C1 0 �Y Mayor O 0 June 17, 2009 Department of Community & Economic Development Gary Upper Conner Homes, LLC 846 1081h Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Project's Period of Validity Puget Colony Short Plat 1 & 2 / City of Renton File LUA06-147 & LUA06-146 Dear Mr. Upper: This letter is sent in response to your request for an extension of the above referenced project's approved period of validity. Section 4-7-070M of the Renton Municipal Code, relating to short plats, authorizes the City to approve a single one-year extension of the standard two-year expiration. Our records indicate that these projects expired on May 14, 2009, but we understand that you are still working to complete the projects and will require additional time, Therefore, your request for the standard one-year extension is hereby granted for LUA06-146 and LUA06-147. You now have until May 14, 2010 to complete and record these two projects. As stated in my previous correspondence, in addition to the above one-year extension, the City Council under Ordinance No. 5452 has provided an opportunity for an additional two-year extension. If you still wish to request the additional two-year extension you are required to submit a written request prior to May 14, 2010. I hope this extension meets your needs and that your project can be completed. You may call Laureen Nicolay at (425) 430-7294 if you have any further questions. Sincerely, \J -CF— . C.E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director CC City of Renton File No. LUA06-147 & LUA06-146 Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Mike Dotson, Plan Reviewer Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 0 fentonwa.gov -Y o� v�`G � iC�#kt, fCanl4a. Movnr May 21, 2007 Frank Cook and baron Cook 4910 NE ;1st Court Renton, -WA 98059 Re: Your appeal of Hearing Eatarniner's decision.dated 1/18/2007, on the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat; File: LUA-06-146; and appeal of Administrative Report and Decision dated 1/25/2007, on the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File: LUA-06-147: Dear Appellants. - At the regular Council meeting of May 14, 2007, the Renton City Council took action on the referenced appeal by adapting the recommendation of the Planning and.Development Committee, affirming the decision of the Hearing Examiner egarding the above referenced . matter.. Enclosed is copy `of the Planning and Development Committee repot`t as adopted. Unless an appeal of the decision of the City Council is filed with King County Superior Court as indicated in Renton Municipal Cade, the decision of the City Council is final. If I can provide further information, please feel free to contact me... Sincerely, Bonnie 1. Walton City Clerk Enclosure cc: Mayor Kathy Keolker " Council President Toni Nelson Larry Warren; City Attorney Jennifer Henning, Principal. Planner Parties of Record (15) 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 -- (425) 43M510 / FAX (425) 430-6516 � E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE �This paCiercw duirr 50".1;rer-ycl�.d materia1,3Q1 pp51 consurner '. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT %lay 14, 2007 V COWWL date .5--/4/ ;?OD�`1 Appeal of PUGET COLONY HOMES I & II File Nos. LUA 06-146 SHPL-H & LUA 06.1g7 SHPL-A Referred February 26, 2007 & May 7, 2007 Applicant John Skochdopole/Conner Homes submitted two short plat applications for Puget Colony Homes. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H was heard before the Hearing Examiner as it involved the subdivision of live lots for the future construction of single family homes. Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A was submitted to the City of Renton's Department of PBPW as it involved less than five lots. The Hearing Examiner approved the plat and issued his decision on January 18, 2007. PBPW Administrator Zimmerman also approved the smaller plat application in his report on January 25, 2007. Appellants Frank and Karen Cook appealed both these decisions. Because both matters involved identical parties and issues, other than the respective lot sizes, the matters were consolidated. The Planning and Development Committee ("Committee") heard both matters on May 10, 2007. The subject property is located in the Puget Colony area in the 4900 block of SE 2°1 Place in Renton, WA. This area was annexed into the City of Renton in December, 2005, with an R8 zoning. in December, 2006, the City of Renton rezoned this area to an R4. Prior to the R4 zoning taking effect, Applicant Conner Homes vested their plat application to the R8 zoning. At the plat application hearing held before the Hearing Examiner on January 9, 2007, the issue of a covenant was presented before the Examiner. The City Staff investigated the covenant and the City Attorney found no evidence to conclude that it was a public,covenant. There was no evidence shown to contradict this conclusion and therefore, the Hearing Examiner determined that it was a private covenant, and as such, unenforceable by the City. The Hearing Examiner thus, lacked jurisdiction to consider the private covenant for purposes of the plat hearing. Pursuant to RMC 4-8-110F(5) and (6), the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which consists of, but is not limited to the Hearing Examiner's Report, the Notice of Appeal and the Submissions by the Parties. The Committee heard the presentation by City Staff and argument by attorney for Appellants and attorney for Applicants. After reviewing the record, the submissions by the parties and having heard oral argument, the Planning and Development Committee hereby finds and recommends as follows: Appellant's attorney conceded that the Applicant had vested to the R8 zone and that the covenant was likely a private covenant. Based on the evidence presented before the Committee, the Committee found no basis to determine that the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error in fact or law. Planning and Development C ittee Report Page 2 Therefore, the Committee recommends that the City Council find that the Hearing Examiner did not make any substantial error in fact or law in approving both plat applications. And, the Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner. Terri Briere, (ti�hair Dan Clawson, Vice Chair C u�Lat" arcie Palmer, Member cc: Neil Watts Jennifer Henning Lawrence J. Warren Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 ONE I" Court Renton, WA 98059 Lola Archer 4904 NE i '` Court Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke 4914 NE V' Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE I" Street Renton, WA 98059 Elizabeth fliggins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 John Skochdopole, P.E_ Conner l lomes 846-108"' Avenue NE, 4202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Ann S. Nielsen, Assist City Atty Office of the City P.O_ Box 626 Renton, WA 98058 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-75"' Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 .orey Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-198"' Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 J. Scott Ralston Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 Brian Westerbeck P.Q. Box 1767 Renton, WA 98057 Dave Jordan 4902 2"" SE Renton, WA 98059 diichele Fietland Bob Johns Kayren Kittrick 1016 SE 2"d Street 1601 114"' SE �'1 10 Development Services 1055 S Grad Wa :enton, WA 98059 Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA Way May 14, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 168 SPECIAL PRESENTATION Parks Director Betlach and Transportation Planning and Programming Community Services. Trails Supervisor Seitz reported on the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan, a joint and Bicycle Master Plan effort of the Transportation Systems Division and the Parks Division. Mr. Seitz explained that in 2005, State law was amended to include requirements for local governments to incorporate bicycle and pedestrian planning into each comprehensive plan. He noted that Renton is the hub of three major trails: Cedar River Trail, Lake Washington Loop, and Interurban Trail, and that the Transportation Systems Division was awarded a $100,000 federal grant to create a bicycle route map. APPEAL Planning & Develonrnent Committee Appeal: Puget Colony Homes 1 & 2 Short Plats, Cook, SHP 06-146 & SHP-06-147 Ms. Betlach reviewed the goals of the master plan, which include interconnecting neighborhoods and local destinations, creating a safe and convenient network that provides local and regional connectivity, encouraging healthy lifestyles, and encouraging alternate modes of transportation. Mr. Seitz listed the master plan objectives, including identifying local and regional destinations in a trail and bicycle network, inventorying and evaluating existing trails and bicycle routes, identifying connections to major destinations, identifying preferred network of routes, identifying safety issues, developing methodology to prioritize improvements, and ensuring accommodation of a wide variety of users and trip purposes. Continuing, Mr. Seitz and Ms. Betlach reviewed the master plan outcomes and Ms. Betlach reviewed the public outreach plan, which includes public open houses, Council briefings, and meetings with the Renton Non -Motorized Transportation Advisory Committee and the Park Board. Ms. Betlach noted that the final presentation to Council and the adoption of the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan is proposed for January 2008. Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report regarding the appeal of the Puget Colony Homes 1 and 2 short plats. Applicant John Skochdopole of Conner Homes submitted two short plat applications for Puget Colony Hornes. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, SHP-06-146, was heard before the Hearing Examiner as it involved the subdivision of five lots for the future construction of single-family homes. Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, SHP- 06-147, was submitted to City of Renton's Department of Planning/Building/Public Works as it involved less than five lots. The Hearing Examiner approved the plat and issued his decision on 1/18/2007. Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Zimmerman also approved the smaller plat application in his report on 1/25/2007. Appellants Frank and Karen Cook appealed both these decisions. Because both matters involved identical parties and issues, other than the respective lot sizes, the matters were consolidated. The Committee heard both matters on 5/10/2007. The subject property is located in the Puget Colony area in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Pl. in Renton. This area was annexed into the City in December 2005, with R-8 zoning. In December 2006, the City of Renton rezoned this area to R-4. Prior to the R-4 zoning taking effect, applicant Conner Homes vested their plat application to the R-8 zoning. At the plat application hearing held before the Hearing Examiner on 1/9/2007, the issue of a covenant was presented before the Hearing Examiner. City staff investigated the covenant and the City Attorney found no evidence to conclude that it was a public covenant. There was no evidence shown to contradict this conclusion and therefore the Hearing Examiner determined that it was a private covenant, and as such, unenforceable by the City. The Hearing Examiner thus lacked jurisdiction to consider the private covenant for purposes of the plat hearing. May 14, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 169 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Pursuant to City Code 4-8-110F(5) and (6), the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which consists of, but is not limited to the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and the submissions by the parties. The Committee heard the presentation by City staff and argument by attorney for the appellants and attorney for the applicants. After reviewing the record, the submissions by the parties and having heard oral argument, the Committee hereby found and recommended as follows: appellant's attorney conceded that the applicant had vested to the R-8 zone and that the covenant was likely a private covenant. Based on the evidence presented before the Committee, the Committee found no basis to determine that the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error in fact or law. Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council find that the Hearing Examiner did not make any substantial error in fact or law in approving both plat applications. The Committee further recommended that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Chief Administrative Officer Covington reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2007 and beyond. Items noted included: • Everyone is invited to a community forum on emergency preparedness presented by the City of Renton on May 22 at the Renton Community Center. • Two free natural yard care workshops are going to be held at the Renton Senior Activity Center. The first, "The Good, the Bad, and the Bugly" is on May 17, and the second, "Are Noxious Weeds Growing in Your Backyard" is scheduled for May 24. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, noted that the political Citizen Comment: DeMastus - campaign season has begun, and she wished all candidates well. She expressed Political Campaigning her hope that candidates will not take each others campaign signs and destroy them. Citizen Comment: Radford - Dean Radford, Editor of the Renton Reporter, 600 Washington Ave. S., Kent, Official Newspaper 98032, spoke on the consent agenda item concerning designation of The Seattle Times as the City's official newspaper. He requested that the matter be referred to the Finance Committee for further review. Mr. Radford noted the commitment the Renton Reporter's news staff has for covering the City and its residents, saying that the coverage is not matched by any other newspaper. He further noted that the newspaper is looking for office space in Renton, and that the Renton Reporter reaches nearly 30,000 households in Renton.. Citizen Comment: McOmber - Howard McOmber, 475 Olympia Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, expressed his hope Highlands Area that the ordinances concerning the Highlands area listed on the council meeting Redevelopment, Trails and agenda move forward without any changes, such as to the conforming uses and Bicycle Master Plan not having to demolish anything as long as it is within the standards. He also voiced concern regarding the safety of the trails in the Highlands area, saying he is looking forward to providing input on the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Mr. McOmber recommended the elimination of dark, dangerous trail areas, and the establishment of wheel chair -friendly and mobility scooter -friendly trails. Citizen Comment: Doyle - Charles Doyle, 411 5th Ave. S., Renton, 98057, introduced himself as the Political Campaigning director of the Highlands Community Association's candidate search committee. Mr. Doyle indicated that he has talked to a number of people who are interested PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 14, 2007 ANDPiova) ay CCTV COUNCIL Appeal of PUGET COLONY HOMES) & fI File Nos. LUA 06-146 SHPL-H & LUA 06- SHPL-A Referred February 26, 2007 & May 7, 2007 Applicant John Skochdopole/Conner Homes submitted two short plat applications for Puget Colony Homes. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H was heard before the Hearing Examiner as it involved the subdivision of five lots for the future construction of single family homes. Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A was submitted to the City of Renton's Department of PBPW as it involved less than five lots. The Hearing Examiner approved the plat and issued his decision on January 18, 2007. PBPW Administrator Zimmerman also approved the smaller plat application in his report on January 25, 2007. Appellants Frank and Karen Cook appealed both these decisions. Because both matters involved`identical parties and issues, other than the respective lot sizes, the matters were consolidated. The Planning and Development Committee ("Committee") heard both matters on May 10,-2007. The subject property is located in:the Puget Colony area in the 4900 block of SE 2" d Place in Renton, WA. This area was annexed into the City of Renton in Weember, 2005, with an R8 zoning. In December, 2006, the City of Renton rezoned this area to an R4. Prior to the R4 zoning taking effect, Applicant Conner Homes vesf6d kheir plat application to the R8 zoning. At the plat application hearing held -before the Hearing )examiner on January 9, 2007, the issue of a covenant was presented before the Examiner. The City Staff investigated the covenant and the City Attorney found no evidence to conclude that it vistas a public covenant. There was no evidence shown to contradict this conclusion and 'therefore, the Hearing Examiner determined that it was a private covenant, and as such, unen['orceable-by the City. The Hearing Examiner thus, lacked jurisdiction to consider the private covenant for purposes of the plat hearing. Pursuant to RMC 4-8-11017(5) and (6), the Committee's decision and recommendation is limited to the record, which consists of, but is not limited to the Hearing Examiner's Report, the Notice of Appeal and the Submissions by the Parties. The Committee heard the presentation by City Staff and argument by attorney for Appellants and attorney for Applicants. After reviewing the record, the submissions by the parties and having heard oral argument, the Planning and Development Committee hereby finds and recommends as follows: Appellant's attorney conceded that the Applicant had vested to the R8 zone and that the covenant was likely a private covenant. Based on the evidence presented before the Committee, the Committee found no basis to determine that the Hearing Examiner made a substantial error in fact or law. • 1+ Kathy Keolker, Mayor September 12, 2007 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Subject_ Planning/Butvaing/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator CITY CLERK CITY OF RENTON S E P 1 3 2007 CITY CMK S oFFlCE Please see attached new plats that have just been addressed. Please add these addresses to your City directories and maps - Amanda Court Short Plat Blakey Townhomes Short Plat Chen Short Plat Garden of Eden LLA Honey Brooke West/Sagecrest Plat Langley Ridge Plat Ng Short Plat Rainier Station LLA ncerely, .Ian Conklin Energy Plans Examiner Development Services Division Telephone: 425-430-7276 #l:platadd Barbee Mill Plat Bretzke Rogers Lotline adjustment Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 Highlands Park Plat Houvener Short Plat Brewis/Meadow Ave Short Plat Puget Colony I Short Plat Renton Prop Short Plat 1055 South Grady y� Way - Renton, Washington 98057 R —, ( IN"', Wass =s a rare a. 140TH AWE SE- ,r ------------------ z -s r_---__ - i 1 e 1---------------- J t L----- -- --- ! R V � � Y _ I ! 1 t------------------------J r ; • f r rtl RE4 a _ r V --------- ------- ' t ♦ t r ib F ! -31 l 1 r , _ t r w r_---i_ + llOp,IYJIZ ecYoa - S0.OI` F ir 1 t r 1 ! i ! .cnm HQQ W AWE KE cir lip it i Off i f.yO rem o* • w_ YL\RI G`A - Wl1/.[LRT l7V/fly✓ p,E 1t17 A16[CLL 1f�A4 cMefMefflrrG ftAN1110- 7tl[if a'MO Marc, i 3, 2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 68 Budget: 2008 Amendment, Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval to amend Benson Hill Communities the 2008 Budget in the amount of $1,189,368 to provide for additional costs Annexation related to serving the Benson Hill Communities Annexation area. Council concur. (See page 69 for ordinance.) Finance: Carry Forward Finance and Information Services Department requested approval of the carry Ordinance forward ordinance in the amount of $31,097,336, which increases the 2008 Budget by carrying forward funds from 2007 for projects that were not completed in 2007. Council concur. (See page 70 for ordinance.) Legal: Parking Sign Legal Division recommended approval to clarify language in City Code Section Regulations 10-10-6, Signs And/Or Markings Required, to require parking signs on City streets only for those regulations that are unique to a particular street. Council concur. (See page 70 for ordinance.) Airport: T-Hangar Unit & Tie- Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of the following at the Down Space Waiting List Fees airport: a $100 City T-Hangar unit and hangar waiting list fee, and a $25 City tie -down space waiting list fee. Council concur. (See page 69 for resolution.) CAG: 07-044, Phase II Utility Systems Division recommended approval of an amendment to CAG-07- Municipal Stormwater Permit 044, Phase I1 Municipal Stormwater Permit appeal agreement with a coalition Appeal, Interlocal Agreement of government entities to fund legal services, which increases the City's share of the legal services by up to $25,000. Council concur. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Zwicker presented a report Plannine & Development regarding the City Code Title IV (Development Regulations) docket. The Committee Committee recommended that the public hearing set for 3/10/2008 on the Planning: Development proposed helipad and commercial office residential zoning text amendments be Regulations (Title IV) Docket cancelled. The hearing on the helipad amendments will be re -set at a later date Review following completion of an appeal on the issue. The hearing on the commercial office residential amendments will be re -set in combination with other Title IV docket items at a later date. MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Zwicker presented a report recommending Latecomer Agreement: Conner concurrence in the staff recommendation to grant preliminary apprwial of the Homes, Puget Colony request for a latecomer agreement from Conner Homes Company, for a period Development, LA-07-002 of two years. The application for a latecomer agreement was submitted to recover the $164,905.79 estimated cost for a sewer main extension along SE 2nd Pl. and SE 2nd St. to serve the proposed Puget Colony Short Plats 1 and 2 (SHP-06-146 and SHP-06-147). The Committee further recommended that Council authorize the preliminary assessment roll to be forwarded to the City Clerk, who will notify the affected property owners. If no protests are received, after construction of the facilities and approval of the final costs, staff shall present the latecomer agreement for final approval by Council and authorize preparation of the final assessment roll and latecomer agreement. In the event there is a protest for valid cause, a public hearing will be held to resolve any issues prior to proceeding with this matter. MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Ar"")POVED By .1 C77 UNCtL Date 3_-m20o UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT March 3,2005 Latecomer Agreement Request Conner Homes Latecomer Agreement/SE 2nd Place and SE. 2nd Street- File LA-07-002 eferred February 25, 2008) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to grant preliminary approval of the request for a latecomer agreement from Conner Homes Company " for a period of two (2) years. The application for a latecomer's agreement was submitted to "recover the "$164,905.79 estimated cost for a sewer main extension along SE 2nd Place and SE 2nd Street to serve the proposed Puget Colony Short Plats, I and 2• (LUA-06'-146 and LUA-06- 147). The Committee further recommends that Council. authorize the preliminary assessment roll to be forwarded to the City Clerk, who will notify the affected property owners. If no protests are received, after construction of the facilities acid approval of the finalcosts, staff shall" present the latecomer agreement for final approval fly Council and authorize preparation of the final assessment roll and latecomer agreement. In the" event there is a protest for. valid cause, a - public hearing will be held to resolve any issues priorto proceeding with this matter. Rich Zwicker, air .J,�--� Greg or,.'Vice Chair 4 ; Member cc:: " Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Karen McFarland; UtilitySystemsEngineering Specialist Mi"-hael Dotson, ,Development Services Engineering Specialist M May 7, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 158 Earthworks, Inc., in the amount of $1,181,670 (budgeted amount $1,150,000). Refer to Utilities Committee for discussion of funding. Vacation: Field Ave NE, ESM City Clerk reported receipt of $6,850 compensation paid by petitioner, as set by Consulting Engineers, VAC- Council on 3/12/2007, and recommended adoption of the ordinance to finalize 06-004 the ESM Consulting Engineers vacation of a portion of Field Ave. NE, north of NE 2nd St. Council concur. (See page 160 for ordinance.) Appeal: Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, SHP-06-147 Plat: Kristen Woods, Benson Dr S, FP-06-142 City Clerk reported Hearing Examiner's Stipulation and Order regarding the Puget Colony 1 and 2 short plats, and reported all parties agreement to the stipulation and order to consolidate the hearings of the appeal of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, SIIP-06-146, previously referred to Planning and Development Committee on 2/26/2007, and the appeal of the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat (SHP-06-147). Refer the appeal of the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat to Planning and Development Committee. Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the Kristen Woods Finaf Plat; 20 single-family lots on 3.81 acres located at the 3200 block of Benson Dr. S. Council concur. (See page 159 for resolution.) Development Services: Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Thomas Short Plat, ROW dedication for additional right-of-way at the corner of Park Ave. N. and N. 34th Dedication, Park Ave N St. to fulfill a requirement of the Thomas Short Plat (SHP-06-089). Council concur. Airport: Northwest Seaplanes Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an addendum to the Lease, LAG-91-005 airport lease LAG-91-005 with Northwest Seaplanes, Inc. to increase the ground rate from $30,026.95 to $33,633.84 annually, which will remain in effect through 12/31 /2011 _ Council concur. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Clawson presented a report Plannine & Development regarding the Highlands Subarea zoning and land use changes. The Committee Committee recommended concurrence with the report and recommendations of the Planning: Highlands Area Highlands Zoning Task Force, which propose a series of zoning and land use Redevelopment, Study Area changes in the Highlands Study Area. The Committee further concurred with Zoning & Land Use Changes the two staff recommended changes to the task force's proposal: • To keep the task force recommended RM-F (Residential Multi -Family) zoning in the Harrington "tail" between NE 7th St. and NE 9th St., but to change the underlying land use designation to CV (Center Village), in compliance with the land use designation policies in the Comprehensive Plan. • To add a note restricting office and conference uses in the CV -zoned property on Edmonds Ave. NE. The Committee further recommended that the ordinances implementing these proposed changes be presented for first reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (Seepage 160 for ordinances.) Community Services Community Services Committee Vice Chair Palmer presented a report Committee regarding the Maplewood Golf Course golf cart lease -purchase agreement. The Community Services: Golf Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve a Cart Lease -Purchase formal 48 month lease -purchase agreement with Northwest Yamaha Golf Carts Agreement, Yamaha for 50 gasoline powered golf carts. Fifty carts from the current fleet will be C "OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA LL as #: • Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 5/7/2007 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton, x6502 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Stipulation and Order Correspondence.. dated 5/1/2007 regarding the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, Ordinance ............. approximately .48 acre, located at 902 Union Ave. NE Resolution............ (File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A) Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: A. Hearing Examiner's Stipulation & Order (5/l/2007) Study Sessions...... B. Hearing Examiner Decision-LUA-06-146 r1/]8,2007) Information......... C. Administrative Decision-LUA-06-147 (1/26/2007) Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... Refer to Planning and Development Committee Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: On February 26, 2007, Council referred to the Planning and Development Committee an appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision for the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, a .79-acre parcel to be subdivided into five lots for single-family homes located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place (SHP-06-146). On January 25, 2007, an Administrative Short Plat Report and Decision was issued for the Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, 2 parcels totaling approximately .48-acre, to be subdivided into 3 lots for single-family homes located at 902 Union Ave. NE. (SHP-06-147). On January 26, 2007, Appellants Frank and Karen Cook filed an appeal of both Puget Colony 2 and Puget Colony 1, to the City Council and Hearing Examiner, respectively. On May 1, 2007, the Hearing Examiner held the scheduled hearing on the appeal of Puget Colony 1, the Administrative Decision. The City Attorneys Office and Appellants' Attorney submitted a Stipulation and Order to the Hearing Examiner. No one else appeared for this hearing. The Hearing Examiner reviewed the Stipulation and signed the Order finding that the Puget Colony 1 and 2 Short Plats involve the same applicant, the same appellants and identical factual and legal issues. Therefore, the Hearing Examiner affiirnied the Administrative Decision of Puget Colony 1. The Parties stipulated to this appeal hearing in order to consolidate and eliminate the need for redundancy, which would occur if hearings were to be held separately for each Short Plat on essentially the same matter. With Council's approval to Refer to Planning and Development Committee as hereby presented, both matters can be heard and reviewed simultaneously without delay. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Puget Colony Short Plat 1 Appeal Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06-I47, SHPL-A STIPULATION AND ORDER 13 THIS MATTER came before Fred J. Kaufina i, Hearing Examiner, City of 14 Renton, on May 1, 2007. Appellants Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook appeared by is 11 and through J. Scott Ralston of the Law Firm Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC, and 16 the City of Renton appeared by and through Am S. Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney. 17 Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the following findings 18 of fact and law are hereby entered and it is ORDERED: 19 1. On January 9, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner heard the 20 application of Puget Colony 2 Short flat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H. At the time of the 21 January 9, 2007 hearing, the undersigned Hearing Examiner frilly considered all 22 Exhibits entered into the record, the staff report and recommendations, the testimony 23 and arguments of the applicant, and the testimony and arguments of concerned 24 citizens, including Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook; 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER Page i of 3 Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 99033 (425)803-9500 1 11 2. On January 18, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner rendered a 2 11 decision in the application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H, 3 11 which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated -herein by reference; 1 11 3. On January 25, 2007, Gregg A. Zimmerman, the City of Renton 5 11 Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works Administrator, entered an 6 11 Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06- 7 11147, SHPL-A.1 A copy of said Short Plat Report & Decision is attached hereto as 8 11 Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by reference; 9 11 4. On May 1, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner was presented 10 11 with this stipulation regarding the appeal by Appellants Frank and Karen Cook of the 11 11 Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06- 12 11147, SHPL-A. The undersigned Hearing Examiner fully considered the 13 Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision dated January 25, 2007, and all Exhibits 14 11 entered into the record, and the errors raised on appeal by Frank Jay Cook and Karen 15 11 Cool[. 16 11 5. The undersigned Hearing Examiner finds that Puget Colony I Short 17 II Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A and Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 18 19 2 0 'The plats are adjacent to each other. Both plat applications involve the same parties and issues. The plats differ in size. Therefore, under the Renton Municipal Code 4-8-070(H)(1)(m) [5 to 9 lots] Puget Colony 2 Short Plat was presented to the Bearing Examiner, whereas Puget Colony I Short Plat determination is made by the City's 21 Administrator per RMC 4-8-070(C)(I8) [under 5 Iots]. 22 AppeIlants have appealed both plat applications- Since Puget Colony 2 was heard before the Hearing Examiner, the appeal of this decision is to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-1 [0(E)(8)- Puget Colony 1, the Administrator's Decision is appealed to the Hearing Examiner RMC 4-8-1 I0(E)(1)(a). Given the identical features 23 and issues of both plats, Appellants anticipate that the Hearing Examiner will reach the same result for Puget Colony 1. Appellants would then appeal this result to the City Council. "Therefore, in an effort to consolidate and 24 eliminate the need for redundancy by having multiple hearings on essentially the same matter, the parties have agreed to this stipulation- This process would now allow the City Council to review both matters, Puget Colony I and 2 simultaneously without delay. 25 ST[PULATION AND ORDER Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 99033 (425) 803-9500 Page 2 of 3 I ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 i 24 25 involve the same applicant, John Skochdolpole, P.F. on behalf of Conner Homes CO., the same Appellants, Frank and Karen Cook, and identical factual and legal issue`s. 6. Based on this stipulation and review of all the records referenced herein, the undersigned Hearing Examiner concludes that its decision and findings set fortis in the January 18, 2007, decision regarding Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06- 146, SHPL�H are similarly applicable to this matter. Therefore, the Findings and Conclusions set forth in Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H attached hereto as Exhibit 1, are hereby adopted and incorporated herein. T The Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony I Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SIVL-A attached hereto as Exhibit 2 approving Puget Colony Short Plat 1 is therefore hereby affirmed. Fred J. KaufmW Hearing Examiner City of Renton -57 '/f 3 Presented by. colt Ralston, WSBA No. 37, 4 BRISLAWN LOYFON GREGOREK,PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, Washington 98033 Attorney for Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook Approved for Entry: J.Nielson, �WSBA No. 31425 Assistant City Attorney Office of the City PO Box 626 Renton, WA 98057-0626 STIPULATION AND ORDER Hrisiawn rnfton CrregorL*. PLIC 3450 Carillon Point iCiile'WA WA 98033 (425)803-9500 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 1 January 18, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITA' OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT/CONTACT: OWNERS: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT. John Skochdopole, P_E_ Conner homes 846-108"' Ave NE, 4202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Cory Richard and Cindy .Toy Brandt 3038 —198" Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507 —75"' Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat LIJA 06-146, SHPL-H 4900 block of SE 2nd Place . Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 0.79 acre parcel into five (5) lots for the future construction of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 3, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MIN(ITES The following minutes are a summary of the January 9, 2007 hearing. The legal record is recorded. on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 9:14 a-m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No..1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SI1 January 18, 2007 Page 2 Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Short Plat Map Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Plan Preliminary Tree Cutting/Clearing Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 8: Rezone Map Exhibit No. 9: Aerial Photograph Exhibit No. 10: Schedule B of Title Report Exhibit No. 11: Puget Colony 2 Plat Face Exhibit No. 12: Typed sheet with restrictions from the face of the Plat Exhibit No. 13: County Preliminary Plat Action from King Exhibit No. 14: Letter from Seattle King County Department of Public Health De artment Exhibit No. 15. Title Report for Archer The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing a sub- division of three lots located in northeast Renton. There are two owners of the three existing lots. The lots abut on SE 2"d Place and if the application is approved, will be subdivided into five new lots. The lots were located in Residential-8 Zone at the time the application was submitted, the area has since been rezoned to Residentia14, however, the lots will comply with the R-8 zoning designation. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Single -Family. The sites have not been previously developed due to the high ground water table in the area and the fact that the septic systems would not function. The lots can now be developed due to the fact that sewers will be installed. This short plat application was not subject to review by the Environmental Review Committee. There are no known critical areas on the property. A wetland and stream analysis was submitted with the application. The site slopes down to the southeast corner of the property, drainage will flow in this direction into an existing system. The applicant has indicated that they will attempt to save trees existing along the north property line, the rest of the vegetation will be removed. The conceptual landscape plan was submitted. The plan shows street trees, they are very small and will be in the front yards of the new lots_ The new five Iots would be 6,600 square feet or larger which is above the minimum lots size required in this zone. The Iots meet all of the zoning development standards for width, depth, lot size and potential setbacks. The subdivision also meets the comprehensive plan designation objectives and policies for subdivision of land and for the community design element policies, A net density of 625 dwelling units per acre for the site is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone. The new lots will be accessed via driveways off of NE 2"d Place. There are plans by the City to improve NE 2nd Place, there is a school in the vicinity and several parks which people access via NE 2"d Place. The applicant has agreed to pay Street Improvement costs in lieu of actually doing the improvements. This allows the City to retain some consistency with the street designs. Staff recommended Park, Fire and Transportation Fees be required as a condition of approval. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 3 There are no sanitary sewer lines to the property, there is a lift station under construction and these lots would be served by the new sanitary sewer system. There would be an East Renton Sewer Assessment District .Fee imposed on each lot and sewer system development charges for both wastewater and surface water. The applicant has received a Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90. John Skochdopole, Conner Homes, 846-108"' Ave NE, Suite 202, Bellevue, WA 98004 stated that he is the project manager. That is Field Street to the west of the project and is rather fragmented. He believes the C:ity's intent is to not improve that street. Frank Cook 4910 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 thanked the City for the rezone of this area, it is unfortunate that the effective date allows this project to fall under the prior zone designation. Ile checked the filings and believes that several shortcuts have been taken that should not have been taken. Secondly, the Puget Colony homes were platted as RBI in King County in 1968, the only reason it was changed to R-8 was the growth management plan that received very little review from the citizens and residents in this area. They have asked that Renton review this process and with over a year of thorough analysis they came to the conclusion that this should be R4. The residents believe that this area should remain consistent with the R-4 zoning designation. Lola Archer, 4904 NE i" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated her concerns were many, first the regrading. She lives adjacent to Laurelhurst and now has a rock wall better than nine feet tall with a more than six-foot fence on top of it that abuts her backyard. She is concerned with the regarding that would be done with this new project and what the difference is between three homes and five. It seems that this project should be consistent with the rest of the community. After researching through King County files, she found that it stated that the area was not to be subdivided to smaller areas. Al Dembowsk., 4906 NE Vt Street, Renton, WA 98059 questioned that in a situation where there is a covenant or statement that lots cannot be subdivided, i f that has any meaning at all, does it apply in this instance'? He would request a delay in the Hearing Examiner's decision in order to determine if there is any significance to that issue. When the density is changed, the character of this particular area is changed. Karen Cook, 4910 NE 15` Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that as the presentation came about she noted that on Exhibit 6, which showed the trees, there is not way that those trees can be saved. When the homes are built on these small lots, they will completely fill the lots. She also thought that the square footage that is show on the report is incorrect. The total square footage from King County records shows 33,670 square feet, the City of Renton shows 34,374 square feet. Elizabeth Hi ins, introduced Schedule B of a 'little Report provided by Mr. Crook to the Long Range Planning Division, Item 3 of Schedule B states "restrictions contained in said plat as follows: no lot or portion of lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on the plat." The second thing she received from the applicant at the time of application is the face of the plat, recording number with King County is in the lower left hand corner. The restriction states, "no lot or portion of a lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located_" This question was put to the City Attorney who said that since it was platted in King County, one of the problems is that it doesn't say when this restriction applied or if it was the zoning at the time the Puget Colony was platted or the zoning in perpetuity, there is no indication of whether it could never be rezoned. The City Attorney's opinion was that the King County records would have to be reviewed. The preliminary plat action for Puget Colony homes was dated November 14, 1967 and states that, "it was moved and seconded that the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.. LUA-06-146, SIIPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 4 preliminary plat be approved and that the follo4ng conditions be applied: 1..C*pliance with all platting regulations of a resolution and subject to tandard conditions of preliminar, lapproval. 2. All lots to meet the minimum requirements of the RS- lot size of lats located in the S-R areas. 3,. There is to be no direct vehicular access to 140"' Avenue SE from those lots which a u i . er y three conditions. After further searching, the Seattle King County Department of Public Health, dated November 20, 1967 there was a letter regarding the soil conditions. This stated that development of the property must be in accordance with the conditions set forth in the engineers report on file. The concern with the lots is whether they would perk or not for septic systems_ All that can be inferred about the restriction on the size of the lot was the concern about the septic systems and the soil conditions_ Karen Cook stated that she had the actual Policy of Title Insurance, which was dated July 9, 1973_ John Skochdo ogle stated that they researched this issue before making application. There is no separate covenant that covers the Puget Colony lots other than that which is written on the face of that plat. That is a standard King County note and was for a very long time, it was used on all plats that served septic, at least through the 70's, 80's and early 90's. Ms. Higgins defined all the setbacks for each of the new lots. Lot I is a corner lot whether or not a street exists and therefore must have wider setbacks than the interior lots. Ms. Archer stated that this development should go back to R4 in order to maintain the community as it was. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that a plan was submitted under the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. They are exempt because what is coming off the site is going to be under the threshold for having to do on -site retention/detention. They will be monitoring it very closely because of the high water table and everything else that is going on in that vicinity. The final TIR will be done in the course of the final review of this site. The grading is limited due to saving the trees in that corner. They cannot do much in the way of grading, the ground if fairly flat. There can be no more or no Iess water coming off the site. Erosion is watched very closely. The City has discussed building their own erosion control manual in order to catch controls that are not covered on the broad scope of King County. Regarding the septic systems, the City of Renton does not determine if a property goes from septic to sewer. Septic is allowed if sewer is not buildable and that would be under the control of the King County Health Department, not the City of Renton. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and DO further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:26 a.m.- FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I , The applicant, John Skochdopole, filed a request for a Short Plat. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat Pile No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 5 The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit # I _ The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review_ The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place_ The subject site is on the north side of SE 2nd Place just east of 140th Avenue SE (King County designation) or Field Avenue_ Staff reported that 140th Avenue is an unopened street and it would probably not be opened. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The subject site is currently zoned R-4 (Single Family - 4 dwelling units/acre). The application for this development apparently was submitted while the subject site was still zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre) and therefore, the applicant is entitled to develop the subject site under R-8 zoning - a legal entitlement called "vesting." (See below regarding Covenants) 8, The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5171 enacted in December 2005. 9. The subject site is approximately 34,374 square feet or 0.79 acres_ The parcel is approximately 245 feet wide (east to west) by approximately 130 feet deep. The subject site consists of three (3) underlying lots that are approximately 11,960 square feet, 12,090 square feet and 9,620 square feet_ 10. The subject site does not contain significant slopes but does slope down toward the southeast. The applicant proposes balancing cut and fill if possible_ Any fill material would be subject to analysis. 11. A tree survey showed 21 significant trees. Staff has noted that five trees would have to be maintained. The applicant proposes retaining some trees located on the northwest portion of the subject site. 12. The applicant proposes re -dividing the existing three lots into five lots_ The lots, Proposed Lots 1 to 5, would be aligned from west to east. 13. Access to the individual lots would be straightforward - directly from SE 2nd Place_ The right-of-way immediately west of the plat would be Field Avenue SE but it is a fragmented roadway and not proposed for access. The applicant proposes paying a fee -in -lieu of developing frontage improvements along SE 2nd Place. This will allow the City to provide consistent improvements along that street. 14. The density for the plat would be 625 dwelling units per acre. This complies with the R-8 zoning that was in effect when the application was accepted. 15. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 2 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis_ Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 6 16. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 50 trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 5 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 17. Stormwater detention is not required according to the analysis submitted by the applicant but this will be checked further depending on circumstances. 18. A high water table had prevented the development of the underlying lots as a suitable septic system could not be developed. The site will now be served by sewer, which allows development of the parcels. 19. The subject site is located in Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Water Availability. The site will have to meet City fire flow standards. 20_ The City has adopted mitigation fees for transportation improvements, fire services and parks and recreational needs based on an analysis of the needs and costs of those services. These fees are applied to new development to help offset the impacts new homes and residents have on the existing community and the additional demand for services. 21 _ There are existing covenants that govern the earlier plat and therefore, the three lots the applicant proposes re -dividing under this review. Neighbors raised objections to the current proposal. They suggested that those covenants prevent re -dividing the property into smaller Iots than the original lot sizes. CONCLUSIONS: 1. This office is not in a position to judge the validity of the underlying covenants that cover the lots that comprise the subject site. The covenants were introduced by neighbors and it will be up to those neighbors to clarify with court action or negotiation how they apply to the subject site. There could be sufficient questions about their affect that they could cloud the title of the proposed lots but that is something that the applicant and future purchasers will have to weigh. The neighbors may always seek legal assistance or take legal action if they wish to pursue the issue outside of this forum. The proposed plat, aside from the covenant issues, appears to serve the public use and interest. It will create additional lots in an area designated for suburban densities. While the comprehensive plan suggests lower density residential uses in this area and that is even demonstrated by the current, lower, R-4 zoning, the applicant took advantage of a window when the site was zoned R-8. They are permitted to seek development that matched the R-8 Zoning. 3. The development will increase the demands on the City's-parks, roads and emergency services. The applicant shall therefore help offset those impacts by providing mitigation that matches the fees established by the City. 4. The development will also increase the tax base of the City and that should help offset the more generalized impacts of the development on City services. The lots are all rectangular and all are larger than the minimum 5,000 square feet required for plats under one acre in older neighborhoods. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 7 6. The applicant will have to comply with general landscaping requirements as well as tree preservation and street tree requirements. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 2. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required. The TESCP shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual_ This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family structure, shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single-family residence shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat, ORDERED THIS 18" day of January 2007 J� FRED J. KAt HLARING E R TRANSMITTED THIS 18`r' day of January 2007 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Development Services City of Renton Lola Archer 4904 NE F" Court Renton, WA 98059 John Skochdopole, P.E_ Conner Homes 846-108°' Ave NE, 4202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 NE 1" Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE I" Street Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke Brian Westerbeck 4914 NE I" Court P Box 1767 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98057 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-1981h Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-75"` Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Dave Jordan 4902 2nd SE Renton, WA 98059 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 10 day of January 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Larry Rude, Fire Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Meckling, Building Official Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Planning Commission Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Transportation Division Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Utilities Division Jennifer Henning, Development Services Neil Watts, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:04 .m. February 1 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is govemed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements_ Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall_ An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 500 p.m., February 1, 2007. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council. or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the Communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Projoet Location. 4900 block of SE 2n" Place • p N[A iAiAi '-1 NfMM VIA - 9Mri TTMfPN• M (f ��VJArylfi�on��� p /I�I��r W'MN �•-•• Lt#7d1llt7YfSN07001?�. �i31VNrD9 ~ --� rcw- W'^""'r""" lV7r 1HOHS.(b/dNIW/7a7FJd e i ------------T 1 1 S r 1 2 � ---- ;-------------------- ---J ODD __ 1 1 I 1 � 1I _#g N _ F Lis W �i YIIiLG iVi Ri iFlVf �,�r J'+w 6w M TGp�y}'SfiFp/i PYAT2 COREw»wJM W` `BJV/V6N HOMES - eXGIHff J�H4 FIAMN.HQ- JVfyl YfM� EXHIBIT 2 REPORT" City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SNORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST.' Report Date. January 25, 2007 Project Name Conner Puget Colany t Short Plat Owner(s): Conner Homes Company; 846 — 108"'Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 Contact. John Skochdolpole, P.E.; Conner biomes Co.; 425-455-9280 File Number. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A Project Manager Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Project Description- The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for 2 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 2 parcels together are approximately 20,813 sf in size and would be subdivided into 3 lots suitable for single-family development. The parcels are currently undeveloped. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zone (R-4), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8), Continued next page Project Location: 902 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton, WA 98059 Project Location Map Maw ShffPtReno,tivr 147ISP, 3du, R-600C, City of Renton PIEUPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 2 of 11 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project_ Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map (November 15, 2006) Exhibit 3: Boundary and Topographic Survey (November 2006) Exhibit 4: Preliminary Short Plat (November 2006) Exhibit 5: Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 6: Preliminary Tree Cutting I Clearing Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 7: Preliminary Landscape Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 8: Aerial Photograph Exhibit 9: Zoning Map (dated 12/16/06) C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record; Conner Homes Company; 846 — 108'h Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 2. Zoning Designation: Residential — 8 du/ac (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single -Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use. Undeveloped 5 Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone East. Vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone South: One developed lot and one vacant tot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone West: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone 6. Access: The access for the newly formed krts would be the same as for the existing lots, from Hoquiam Avenue NE via NE a Street 7. Site Area: 20,813 square feet 10.48 acre D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: 60ion Land Use File No. („?rdinance No. Date Annexation NIA 5171 12/05/2005 Comprehensive Plan NIA 5099 11/01/2004 Zoning NIA 5171 12f05/2005 Admih Shrt Ph Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doc City of Renton PIS/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT ^� LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 3 of 11 E. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: The site is outside the City of Renton water service area. Water District 90 supplies water service in this area. A King County Certificate of Water Availability has been provided by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: There are no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to this site. There is a sanitary sewer lift station under construction approximately 200 feet to the east of this site. Service to the proposed plat would be available from this system. Stonmwater: This site lies within the Maplewood Creels basin- There are storm drainage ditches in the vicinity of the site. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved public right-of-way abutting the property, but there are no streetlights, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks. F APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070, Zoning Use I -able Section 4-2-110. Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030. Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-130: Tree Gutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-050: General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat and Lot line Adjustment Procedures Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and flan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150, Streets — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots — General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 7. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; 1. Land Use Element— Residential Single-family 2_ Community Design Element Admin Shd Rift Repor106-147 (SP, 3du, R-8). doc City of Renton P!BIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 4 of 11 H. DEPARTMENTANALYSIS: 1. Proiect Des cri Lion/Back round The proposal is to subdivide 2 previously formed, but undeveloped lots in the Puget Colony plat into 3 lots. Puget Colony was subdivided in 1968 while under the jurisdiction of King County. The land has remained vacant due to several factors including, but not limited to, lack of wastewater service, high groundwater table, inability of the soils to accommodate septic sewer systems, and zoning. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single €amity residences_ In 2005, the property was annexed into the City of Renton with Residential 8 (R-8) zoning, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre (dada). In 2006, the City of Renton initiated a rezone to Residential 4 zoning. Prior to final adoption of this rezone, the applicant submitted a land use master application for this subdivision. The application was deemed complete prior to the R-4 zoning becoming effective. Therefore, the current review of the short plat application utilizes the development standards for the R-8 Zone. During the comment period, following posting notice of the proposed subdivision, staff received 5 comments from neighbors of the potential subdivision. Two comments were in favor of the proposed subdivision, two were opposed to the subdivision, and one expressed a desire for a similar subdivision of property in the vicinity. There are no known critical areas on the property. A Wetland and Stream Analysis was submitted with the application. This report was completed by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. based on field work done in October and November 2006. including the week following record rainfalls in the area. The methodology used Is as described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification Manual (March 1997), which is recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations. The Wetland and Stream Analysis indicates that no wetland hydrology was observed on the parcels. The topography of the site slopes down to the southeast, but does not have significant slopes. The land is vegetated primarily with cottonwood and fir trees. There are approximately 22 trees on the property that would be considered "significant." These include deciduous and evergreen trees 8 inches and larger in diameter at 4.5 feet above ground level. Excluded are populus, alnus, salix, and platanus species. The applicant intends to preserve 3 trees considered worthy of protection_ An additional 3 trees must be planted to achieve the required ratio of protected trees retained or replaced. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted indicating that required landscaping would be provided at the front of each new lot. The 2 lots to be subdivided front on SE 2nd Street and (from west to east) consist of 10,200 sf and 10,613 sf each (approximately). The subdivision of these lots would result in 3 lots of (from west to east) the following acreages: Lot Size s Lot 1 7,092 Lot 2 6,912 Lot 3 6,809 Total 20,813 There are no private streets or easements proposed. Each lot would be accessed directly from SE 2s' Street by private driveways. 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or with sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. COM12liance with ERC Conditions N/A Admin Shd PR Report 06-147 (SP, 3du;' R-8). doc ; f.. City of Renton Pl81PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 4. Staff Review Comments Page 5 of 11 Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based on an evaluation using the following short plat criteria: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation Purpose Statement: Lands in the Residential Single Family Designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. Policies in this section are to be considered together with the policies in the Regional Growth, Residential Growth Strategy section of the Land Use Element, the Community Design Element, and the Housing Element, Policies are implemented with Residential 8 zoning. The proposed plat is consistent with the following Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies for Residential Single Family land use designation. Objective LU-FF. Encourage re -investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: 1) Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets; 2) Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. The project would provide an additional residential lot, which would somewhat further Growth Management targets. Policy LU447. Net development densities should fail within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The three lots would have a density of 6.28 dwelling units per net acre, and therefore is within the preferred density range of the R-8 zone. Policy LU-149. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Lot areas do not include easements. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element apply for the development of new tots in "established neighborhoods" Objective CD-C: Promote re -investment in and upgrade of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property values. The proposed project would develop property that is currently vacant and result in the addition of street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, where none currently exist. Policy CD-10. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established neighborhoods, where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and, where practical, match existing sidewalks. Admin SM PR Report 06-147 fSP, 3dr 4:_Z}.doc City of Renton PIerPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06.147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 6 of 11 The development of the proposed new lots would result in street improvements that meet City of Renton standards where not existed previously. Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. The proposed development would accomplish this policy goal_ Policy CD-13. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and /or responding to more urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of -entries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. Policy CD-14. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with other structures on the site and with adjacent development. Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria: a. Where there are differences in height (e.g., new two-story development adjacent to single -story structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the structure. b. Garages, whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of development established in the vicinity. c. Structures should have entries, windows, and doors located to maintain privacy in neighboring yards and buildings. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures - The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element relate to landscaping: Objective CD-K, Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions. should include landscape plans. A landscape plan has been submitted and is required as a oondition of plat approval. Policy CD-45. Existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in developments_ Trees and vegetation would be removed from the lots, with the exception of 3 trees to be retained. In addition, all pervious areas, except rear yards, are required to be landscaped and addWonal trees, both replacement trees and other required trees, would be planted, as per City of Renton code. This would compensate for the loss of vegetation to a certain extent. Policy CD-53. Landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public entryways, street rights -of -way, storm -water detention ponds, and all common areas. A landscape plan is required indicating that pervious areas of all lots, would be landscaped. b) Compliance with the UnderlWng Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Net Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The R-8 zone is intended for single-family residential development that would add to the city's mix of residential styles including detached, single-family dwellings. The zone is intended to implement the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Development should be promoted in the zone that provides opportunities for detached single-family dwellings, ensures high -quality infill development, and maintains the single-family character of existing, established neighborhoods. Admhl Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (SR 3du; Rr 8). doc City of Renton Pt14iPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL•A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 26, 2007 Page 7 of 11 The maximum density allowed in the R-8 zone is 8 dwelling units per net acre, there is no minimum density requirement on properties smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. Net density is calculated after the deduction from the gross acreage of the site of environmentally critical areas, areas intended for public right-of-way (with the exception of alleys), and private access easements_ In this case, the applicant has a gross site area of 20,813 square feet, with no critical areas or other deductions. The resulting net density of the short plat would be 6.28 dwelling units per acre (3 l 0,48 = 6.28 dulac), which is within the density range allowed in the R-8 zone. The R-8 development standards require a15 foot front yard setback for the primary structure and 20 foot setback for the garage it it is accessed from the fronting street, a 5 foot side yard setback, and a 20 fool rear yard setback. The height limit is 2 stories and 30 feet. The maximum lot coverage by buildings is 35 percent or 2,500 sf for these lots because they are greater than 5,000 sf each. There are 22 significant or "protected" trees on the site, 3 are intended to be retained so in order to meet the requirement to preserve 25 percent of existing significant trees, replacement by 3 trees would be required. This replacement requirement is in addition to other required landscaping. Renton Municipal Code also requires two (2) new trees per lot. Landscaping along the frontage of NE 2nd Street and of all pervious areas of the residential lots would also be required (RMC 4-4-070). This landscaping must be irrigated by an underground automatic system, unless the use of drought -tolerant plants has been approved. Staff recommends that a landscape plan, showing location of replacement trees as well as all required landscaping be submitted for approval to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: Street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk would be required along SE 2"" Street. The applicant may apply for an "in lieu of [construction costs]" payment. Streetlights would not be required for this 3 lot short plat. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities most be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new average daily trip attribuled to the project_ The new lots are expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips each. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $2,153.25 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 3 lots = $2,153.25) and is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Blocks: The proposed Short Plat does not create new blocks. Lot Standards: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots must comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet for property smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision. All lots exceed the minimum size requirement by 1,800 sf or more. The lots appear to contain adequate buildable areas for the construction of suitable single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of building permit application for the new houses. The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. The lots would meet the lot width and depth requirements. The lots are rectangular in shape and aligned in an urban pattern that is consistent with other lots in the immediate vicinity, as well as generally with the city as a whole. Admin Shrt Pit Report (16-147 (SP, 3du, R-.$).doc City of Renton PJBfPW Department Adrninisirative land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 8 of 11 d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: All lots in a short plat must have access to a public street. All lots would continue to front on SE 2"d Street. Topography: The site slopes very gradually from northwest to southeast at an average grade of approximately 1 percent. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties on all sides of the site have been zoned Residential 4 since December 2006. Lots abutting to the south and east and one adjacent to the north are smaller than the undivided 2 lots (9,398 to 9.940 sq. tots abutting to the west and adjacent across SE 2nd Street are about the same size as the undivided lots (10,080 to 10,800 sf). The density of the property to be subdivided with the surrounding abutting and adjacent properties is 4.34 dula. The proposal would result in development at a higher density than existing development in the area. The new density of this area would be 4.88 dula. The density of the 3 new lots would be 6.28 dula. The new lots would be located on a dead end (cul-de-sac) street and, therefore, have an impact more on the adjacent developed lots than the entire Puget Colony subdivision. The new lots would be 49 feet wide abutting the street and 55 Feet wide at the rear property line, due to the configuration of the undivided lots, Lot dimensions can be met by averaging, therefore the lots would meet the development standard for minimum lot width. The abutting lots are approximately 74 feet wide along the street. The houses are set forward on the lots, are configured with the widest dimension parallel to the street, and have only about 5 feet between structures (King County development standards). For these reasons they have the appearance of greater density. They are, however, 1 story buildings and the new structures will be 2 stories each. This will have a visual impact on the neighborhood, although it may not be significant to the extent that it would change the character of the neighborhood. As stated above, the project would meet Comprehensive Flan Community Design policy CD-12: "Infitl development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods_" e) Availability and impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Flre: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staffs indicate that sufficient resources exist to fumish services to the proposed development. A fire hydrant %with 1,W0 GPM Fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage of the house, including the garage, exceeds 3,6W sf in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and two hydrants will be required within 300 feet of the structures. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat, Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat could result in a single new student (0.44 X 3 lots = 1.32) to Me local schools. Renton School District has indicated it can accommodate additional students generated by this proposal at Maplewood Heights Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School. Surface Water: A drainage report was submitted and accepted with calculations showing the project would be exempt from detention and water quality treatment in accordance with the 19W King County Surface Water Design Manual. All other surface water improvements including, but not limited to conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, driveway crossings and any frontage improvements are required to meet City of Renton standards - The Surface Water System Development Charge is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit. Admin Shrt Pft Repot 06-147 (SP. 3du, R-8�doc City of Renton P16lPW Department _ Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SNORT PLAT _ -LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 9 of 11 Water: The King County Certificate of Water Availability from Water district 90 must verify that minimum fire flow requirements are met (hydrants within 300 feet and 1,000 gpm flow). The Certificate of Water Availability must be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to recording the Final Plat. Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Each lot would require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the Final Plat. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. A Sewer Assessment District (East Renton) fee in the amount of $316.801per unit would be due at the time a construction permit is issued. Findings: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval' for the Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No_ LUA-06-147, SHPL-A. 2. Application: The applicant's submittal complies with the requirements for information for a short plat. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 4. Zoning: Although the area of the proposed subdivision is zoned Residential -4, the proposed project is vested, due to timely application, to the previous zoning of Residentiai-8. The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential 8 zoning designation, provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 5 Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations, provided the applicant complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. B. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential single family (zoned R-4); East: Vacant land (zoned R-4); South: Residential single family and vacant land (zoned R4); and West. Residential single family (zoned R4)_ 7. Setbacks: The setbacks for the new houses on the proposed lots would be verified at the time of building permit review. 8. System development Charges: A Surface Water System Development Charge and Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the new single-family lots at the time of issuance of the construction permits. 9. Public Utilities/lmprovements: Improvements will be required for the public street (SE 2" d Street), including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, individual sewer and water stubs must be installed to serve the new lots. Adequate fire hydrants must be installed, and any existing and new fire hydrants must be fitted with 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fittings. Conclusions: The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. The subject site is vested by timely application to the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions are compiled with prior to submitting for Final Plat approval, including requirements of the City of Renton Property Services Division (which will be provided to applicant under separate cover). Admin Shrt Pit Report 06-147 (5P, 3du. R-8)'doc City of Renton PIR/PW department Adminlstradve Land Use Action .., .�.. mrrrnnerrmr.�r�anrr-T�nnwsin.e� CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PEAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 10 of 11 3. The proposed 3 tot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions. 4. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. J. DECISION: The Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscape plan shall be submitted indicating proposed location, size, and type of replacement trees (trees to replace removal of protected trees). Required landscaping, including two trees to be located on each new lot (in addition to replacement trees), shall be indicated on the landscape plan. The landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. 2. A Transportation Impact fee for each lot, estimated at $2,153.25, shall be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 3, A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot shall be required prior to the recording of the final plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: f1' GmggA- 27m rma ' pm9 WAdminist3rator TRANSMI TTED this 25' day of January, 2007, to the OwnedAppllcanYGontact: John Skochdolpole, P.E. Conner Homes Company 846 —108"' Ave NE, #202 Bellevue WA 98004 TRANSMITTED !iris 2e day of January, 2oo7, to the Parties of Record: Mlcheie Fjedand Karen & F-Jay Cook Shannon & Doug Luedtke 5016 SE 2"d Street 4910 NE 1" Court 4914 SE 2"d Street Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 TRA AISM rMD this 2e day of January, 2007, to the foibwingr: Larry Meckling, Building Of clat Larry Rude. Fire Marshal Neil Watts, Development Services Director JennMv Henning. Planning Manager Kayen IQttrtds, Development Engineering Supervisor Jan Conklin, Development Services Carrie Olson. Development Services Admit? Stwt P1tReport 06-147 (St? 3du, R-8).,doa 1-' �LZ 10� 'l Decision date Brian Westerbeck P.O- Box 1767 Renton WA 98057 City of Renton PIWPw Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06.147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 11 of 11 Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3): WAC 197-11-86d), RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal bmeframe. APPEAL_ This administrative land use decision will become final it not appealed in writing to the gearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on February 8, 2007. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together vrith the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1056 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M. ADViSORYNOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. 1- Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shalt be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a.m. and 8,00 p.m- No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 1- All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 sq. ft., the minimum Fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. Additional fire hydrants may be required as a part of this project to meet this criterion. The fire hydrants must meet all current City of Renton standards. 2. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. plan F2nvi.aw — .''fnrmlRi.rfar a Wnfnr 1- A Surface Water System Development Charge of $759.00 per single-family lot is payable prior to final plat recording. r-tat t r1%Vv1Gw — au Gvw 1. Ali new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat. 2. Any damage incurred to the street, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks by this project must be repaired. Plan Review —Sewer 1. This site is located in the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD 0002)- These fees are $316.80 per new connection. These fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. Sewer System Development Charges (SRC) are $1,017.00 per new unit. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to recording the final plat. 3. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed. The existing side sewer may need to be relocated to better serve the short plat and new building foundations. 4- This project is not required to install a sanitary sewer main- The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to reflect this (delete the sewer main from the project plans). 5. The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. plan Ravinw r�nniml 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil 1=ngineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs, 4% of anything over $100,000, but less than $200.000, and 3% of anything over $200.000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See drafting standards. 3- All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network. Admin Shrf Pit Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8)- d i. I&E. 131ST ST) -A� 1 S.1' 8810 0 66 ea o �I) (2) (3) (4) � @ r a 1 Wj s_e 46803e 1.38 Ac. N WAS vv �> 601.75 69&277 1 2 i 3 1 4 5 6 7 a I~ 25 on r5 r" Fdm csagal 14 13 12 11 10 4 . IF L, Air sull 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 — 31 L 30 2rIi�8 8 120 � •j R � ab !3i T ST. 33 fi i 34 36 37 3B 39 4010 g .. 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 L �$ 49 2ND Sr J i N t 9 (5597) f �) `& 50 _ 51 52 53 _ .may _ �,. _ In 64 si 62 61 60 59 59 57 CL M � M AC. K EDIT I 12 2 t� ITA Aftk OMfJIAJR! - �FlNM•11 - OMffI.Mi4Ifl igAl 2kM= +w�ww yJpYn H�7fSy��I� -..-- Apo '+ ` aiaw. •. w JM'6 . rlYxd18A0YMrAMO B��VA 7 E--I U � � .A 6c •fi •� ttl �M M �6 v � ; p7upv:1r49oo er � � � I I I f 5 I •� oQ "R� I Qg� JkWtl_ ----__--—p 8 .pr �rw I � A te' aScG�—, {---I-- r --- g ------- � rr —'------------...------- 1� — — I — -— — — — — — — — — -------.--------------- --------- 'Nil � � s x�x � I I J r® f aacYl Zrro,ft vi Ij it J ,.,f � + • �.`�1° � - ' r. � I a e f - + it �• i I f , a I f ■ ff(b g� 1 r aNflu�ns-nfuNxrfr-afffsp8NraM mmm A[ML' 42 war WNW 91w �^^*•n++ 1V7idJ4VOAfSA&VAffAff23W r k ■ � '� E i Gi r IM I- Hfill b Ill JIM —'. 04 w rov"S1 j 1K I r F I r 9L r I R r N F y% 1 r j 1 i.N1 1 � p �hAp i r 1 r , i i 1 1 F f 1 i a -.- a 1MfJlA�f.r CN...M YT7 9MI-MMA~ �- {Ml.Nrf err Yfgln +r'+f+wT r �...r.... 67 r rIM�Mus. ���/ \V- ` M �F ,•• 3'N 3AY riV1rKxm fS i9r I {pbpl a 1.9 , ^ -- v r 1 i I , g i r � + ; r 1 , � r Ilj r i i r i I r r i r � 1 + , + 1 , r r r + I � � 1 + � r i r . F + 1 1 1 I , f � i + r r r 1. 1 r r ; i i i , , 1 r f 1 1 r i -- aM,aaL Mf •OMfRXf [� Oxlraa w.pMa mmm Ab 49 X.G ' Not 7w Wits NAM* `-" 6 axxn►.a�ra.e � �%'i� I� i rf%e7VW H Gq >� j Of C13 al ht H.3 flea 70 3AV RYKO)W r r � r ' A yy'']] 1. �Vag TM �7�91 HVIODOH I Renton Renton City Limits I Parcels SCALE 1 : 1.162 100 0 100 200 300 FEET h{ifAWlent{metaorg,UapGuidelmaps/Parcel.muvf EXHIBIT 8 Tuesday,.Januasy+ 2-k-2007 10:45 AM — R-8: E6 0 Tn23N R5E 9 1/2 rfi — R R-4 R-4 R 8 CSC: �-4 H V:R m t7 D-1 fl up. �ra Rfl R-8 NE i 2R4sPt_ � Nk-2hT 19 u 4 R— pt T rl cn CQ P-4 w --A U:) SE 142nd St. 'Ice 6 A G6 - 22 T23N ROB V2 ZONM Wl" A IF co SE 145th PI SE SEI EXHIBIT A t---&tL--Ar I q T—" L - 23N R5E,. E 2 3 4 5' 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Puget Colony Short Plat 1 Appeal Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A STIPULATION AND ORDER THIS MATTER came before Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, on May 1, 2007. Appellants Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook appeared by and through J. Scott Ralston of the Law Firm Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC, and the City of Renton appeared by and through Ann S. Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the following findings of fact and law are hereby entered and it is ORDERED: 1. On January 9, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner heard the application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H. At the time of the January 9, 2007 hearing, the undersigned Hearing Examiner fully considered all Exhibits entered into the record, the staff` report and recommendations, the testimony and arguments of the applicant, and the testimony and arguments of concerned citizens, including Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook; STIPULATION AND ORDER Pagel of 3 Srislawn Lofton Gregorck, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 (425) 801-9500 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2. On January 18, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner rendered a decision in the application of Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference; 3. On January 25, 2007, Gregg A. Zimmerman, the City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works Administrator, entered an Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06- 147, SHPL-A.' A copy of said Short Plat Report & Decision is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by reference; 4. On May 1, 2007, the undersigned Hearing Examiner was presented with this stipulation regarding the appeal by Appellants Frank and Karen Cook of the Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06- 147, SHPL-A. The undersigned Hearing Examiner fully considered the Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision dated January 25, 2007, and all Exhibits entered into the record, and the errors raised on appeal by Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook. 5. The undersigned Hearing Examiner finds that Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A and Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H ' The plats are adjacent to each other. Both plat applications involve the same parties and issues. The plats differ in size. Therefore, under the Renton Municipal Code 4-8-070(H)(I )(m) [5 to 9 lots] Puget Colony 2 Short Plat was presented to the Hearing Examiner, whereas Puget Colony I Short Plat determination is made by the City's Administrator per RMC 4-8-070(CX 18) [under 5 lots]. Appellants have appealed both plat applications. Since Puget Colony 2 was heard before the Hearing Examiner, the appeal of this decision is to the Renton City Council. RMC "-I IW)(8). Puget Colony 1, the Administrator's Decision is appealed to the Hearing Examiner RMC 4-8-1 10(EX I xa). Given the identical features and issues of both plats, Appellants anticipate that the Hearing Examiner will reach the same result for Puget Colony 1. Appellants would then appeal this result to the City Council. Therefore, in an effort to consolidate and eliminate the need for redundancy by having multiple hearings on essentially the same matter, the parties have agreed to this stipulation. This process would now allow the City Council to review both matters, Puget Colony I and 2 simultaneously without delay. STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 2 of 3 Brislawn Lofton Gregorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon point Kirkland, WA 99033 (425) 803-9500 1 2 3 4 5 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2s involve the same applicant, John Skochdolpole, P.E. on behalf of Conner Homes Co., the same Appellants, Frank and Karen Cook, and identical factual and legal issues. 6. Based on this stipulation and review of all the records referenced herein, the undersigned Hearing Examiner concludes that its decision and findings set forth in the January 18, 2007, decision regarding Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06- 146, SHPLrH are similarly applicable to this matter. Therefore, the Findings and Conclusions set forth in Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, LUA 06-146, SHPL-H attached hereto as Exhibit 1, are hereby adopted and incorporated herein. 7. The Administrative Short Plat Report & Decision of Puget Colony l Short Plat, LUA 06-147, SHPL-A attached hereto as Exhibit 2 approving Puget I Colony Short Plat 1 is therefore hereby affirmed. Fred J. Kauf n�A Hearing Examiner City of Renton Presented by: ��� 3 . . cott Ralston, WSBA No. 3 4 BRISLAWN LOFTON GREGOREK,PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, Washington 98033 Attorney for Frank Jay Cook and Karen Cook Approved for Entry: Nielsen, WSBA No. 31425 Assistant City Attorney Office of the City PO Box 626 Renton, WA 98057-0626 STIPULATION AND ORDER Page 3 of 3 Brislawn Lofton GmSorek, PLLC 3450 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033 (42.5) 803-95M EXHIBIT 1 January 18, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITE' OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT/CONTACT: OWNERS: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: John Skochdopole, P-E. Conner Homes 846-108`n Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038 —198L' Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507 —75`1' Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 4900 block of SE 2` d Place , Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 0.79 acre parcel into five (5) lots for the future construction of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 3, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 9, 2007 hearing. The legal record is retarded -on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 9: T4 a.m_ in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation ertinent to this re uest. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No._ LUA-06-146, SHP--_1 January 18, 2007 Page 2 Exhibit No, 3: Preliminary Short Plat Map Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Plan Preliminary Tree Cutting/Clearing Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 8: Rezone Ma Exhibit No. 9: Aerial Photo a h Exhibit No. 10: Schedule B of Title Report Exhibit No. 11: Puget Colony 2 Plat Face Exhibit No. 12: Typed sheet with restrictions from the face of the Plat Exhibit No. 13: County Preliminary Plat Action from King Exhibit No. 14: Letter from Seattle King County Department of Public Health Department Exhibit No. 15: Title Report for Archer The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing a sub- division of three lots located in northeast Renton. There are two owners of the three existing lots. The lots abut on SE 2"d Place and if the application is approved, will be subdivided into five new lots. The lots were located in Residential-8 Zone at the time the application was submitted, the area has since been rezoned to Residential4, however, the lots will comply with the R-8 zoning designation. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Single -Family. The sites have not been previously developed due to the high ground water table in the area and the fact that the septic systems would not function. The lots can now be developed due to the fact that sewers will be installed. This short plat application was not subject to review by the Environmental Review Committee. There are no known critical areas on the property. A wetland and stream analysis was submitted with the application. The site slopes down to the southeast corner of the property, drainage will flow in this direction into an existing system. The applicant has indicated that they will attempt to save trees existing along the north property line, the rest of the vegetation will be removed. The conceptual landscape plan was submitted. The plan shows street trees, they are very small and will be in the front yards of the new lots. The new five lots would be 6,600 square feet or larger which is above the minimum lots size required in this zone. The lots meet all of the zoning development standards for width, depth, lot size and potential setbacks. The subdivision also meets the comprehensive plan designation objectives and policies for subdivision of land and for the community design element policies. A net density of 6.25 dwelling units per acre for the site is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone. The new lots will be accessed via driveways off of NE 2"d Place. There are plans by the City to improve NE 2nd Place, there is a school in the vicinity and several parks which people access via NE 2"d Place. The applicant has agreed to pay Street Improvement costs in lieu of actually doing the improvements. This allows the City to retain some consistency with the street designs_ Staff recommended Park, Fire and Transportation Fees be required as a condition of approval. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No__ LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 3 There are no sanitary sewer lines to the property, there is a lift station under construction and these lots would be served by the new sanitary sewer system. There would be an East Renton Sewer Assessment District Fee imposed on each lot and sewer system development charges for both wastewater and surface water. The applicant has received a Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90. John Skochdopole, Conner Homes, 846-108`h Ave NE, Suite 202, Bellevue, WA 98004 stated that he is the project manager. That is Field Street to the west of the project and is rather fragmented. He believes the City's intent is to not improve that street. Frank Cook, 4910 NE I` Court, Renton, WA 98059 thanked the City for the rezone of this area, it is unfortunate that the effective date allows this project to fall under the prior zone designation. He checked the filings and believes that several shortcuts have been taken that should not have been taken. Secondly, the Puget Colony homes were platted as R4 in King County in 1968, the only reason it was changed to R-8 was the growth management plan that received very little review from the citizens and residents in this area. They have asked that Renton review this process and with over a year of thorough analysis they came to the conclusion that this should be R4. "The residents believe that this area should remain consistent with the R-4 zoning designation. Lola Archer, 4904 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated her concerns were many, first the regrading. She lives adjacent to Laurelhurst and now has a rock wall better than nine feet tall with a more than six-foot fence on top of it that abuts her backyard. She is concerned with the regarding that would be done with this new project and what the difference is between three homes and five. It seems that this project should be consistent with the rest of the community. After researching through King County files, she found that it stated that the area was not to be subdivided to smaller areas. Al Dembowski, 4906 NE I" Street, Renton, WA 98059 questioned that in a situation where there is a covenant or statement that lots cannot be subdivided, if that has any meaning at all, does it apply in this instance? He would request a delay in the Hearing Examiner's decision in order to determine if there is any significance to that issue. When the density is changed, the character of this particular area is changed. Karen Cook, 4910 NE i" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that as the presentation came about she noted that on Exhibit 6, which showed the trees, there is not way that those trees can be saved. When the homes are built on these small lots, they will completely fill the lots. She also thought that the square footage that is show on the report is incorrect. The total square footage from King County records shows 33,670 square feet, the City of Renton shows 34,374 square feet. Elizabeth Hi ins, introduced Schedule B of a Title Report provided by Mr. Cook to the Long Range Planning Division, Item 3 of Schedule B states "restrictions contained in said plat as follows: no lot or portion of lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on the plat." The second thing she received from the applicant at the time of application is the face of the plat, recording number with King County is in the lower left hand corner. The restriction states, "no lot or portion of a lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located." This question was put to the City Attorney who said that since it was platted in King County, one of the problems is that it doesn't say when this restriction applied or if it was the zoning at the time the Puget Colony was platted or the zoning in perpetuity, there is no indication of whether it could never be rezoned. The City Attorney's opinion was that the King County records would have to be reviewed. The preliminary plat action for Puget Colony homes was dated November 14, 1967 and states that, "it was moved and seconded that the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January I8, 2007 Page 4 preliminary plat be approved and that the ollo4ng conditions be applied: �Sp'o iance with all platting regulations of a resolution and subject to tandard conditions of preliminaryval. 2. All lots to meet the minimum requirements of the RS- lot size of lats located in the S-R a. . There is to be no direct vehicular access to 140'` Avenue SE from those lots whit a u i . three conditions. After further searching, the Seattle King County Department of Public Health, dated November 20, 1967 there was a letter regarding the soil conditions. This stated that development of the property must be in accordance with the conditions set forth in the engineers report on file. The concern with the lots is whether they would perk or not for septic systems. All that can be inferred about the restriction on the size of the lot was the concern about the septic systems and the soil conditions. Karen Cook stated that she had the actual Policy of Title Insurance, which was dated July 9, 1973. John Skochdopole stated that they researched this issue before making application. There is no separate covenant that covers the Puget Colony lots other than that which is written on the face of that plat_ That is a standard King County note and was for a very long time, it was used on all plats that served septic, at least through the 70's, 80's and early 90's. Ms. Higgins defined all the setbacks for each of the new lots. Lot 1 is a corner lot whether or not a street exists and therefore must have wider setbacks than the interior lots. Ms. Archer stated that this development should go back to R4 in order to maintain the community as it was. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that a plan was submitted under the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. They are exempt because what is coming off the site is going to be under the threshold for having to do on -site retention/detention. They will be monitoring it very closely because of the high water table and everything else that is going on in that vicinity. The final TIR will be done in the course of the final review of this site. The grading is limited due to saving the trees in that corner. They cannot do much in the way of grading, the ground if fairly flat. There can be no more or no less water coming off the site. Erosion is watched very closely. The City has discussed building their own erosion control manual in order to catch controls that are not covered on the broad scope of King County. Regarding the septic systems, the City of Renton does not determine if a property goes from septic to sewer. Septic is allowed if sewer is not buildable and that would be under the control of the King County Health Department, not the City of Renton. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:26 a.m.- FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: The applicant, John Skochdopole, filed a request for a Short Plat. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SIIPL-14 January 18, 2007 Page 5 The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #I_ The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the C:ity's responsible official determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. The subject site is on the north side of SE 2nd Place just east of 140th Avenue SE (King County designation) or Field Avenue. Staff reported that 140th Avenue is an unopened street and it would probably not be opened. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R-4 (Single Family - 4 dwelling units/acre). The application for this development apparently was submitted while the subject site was still zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre) and therefore, the applicant is entitled to develop the subject site under R-8 zoning - a legal entitlement called "vesting." (See below regarding Covenants) The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of [Ordinance 5171 enacted in December 2005. 9. The subject site is approximately 34,374 square feet or 0,79 acres. The parcel is approximately 245 feet wide (east to west) by approximately 130 feet deep. The subject site consists of three (3) underlying lots that are approximately 1.1,960 square feet, 12,090 square feet and 9,620 square feet. 10. The subject site does not contain significant slopes but does slope down toward the southeast. The applicant proposes balancing cut and fill if possible. Any fill material would be subject to analysis. IL A tree survey showed 21 significant trees_ Staff has noted that five trees would have to be maintained. The applicant proposes retaining some trees located on the northwest portion of the subject site. 12. The applicant proposes re -dividing the existing three lots into five lots. The lots, Proposed Lots I to 5, would be aligned from west to east. 13_ Access to the individual lots would be straightforward - directly from SE 2nd Place. The right -of --way immediately west of the plat would be field Avenue SE but it is a fragmented roadway and not proposed for access. The applicant proposes paying a fee -in -lieu of developing frontage improvements along SE 2nd Place. This will allow the City to provide c6nsistent improvements along that street. 14. The density for the plat would be 6.25 dwelling units per acre. This complies with the R-8 zoning that was in effect when the application was accepted. 15. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 2 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No,: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 6 16. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 50 trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 5 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 17. Stormwater detention is not required according to the analysis submitted by the applicant but this will be checked further depending on circumstances. 18. A high water table had prevented the development of the underlying lots as a suitable septic system could not be developed. The site will now be served by sewer, which allows development of the parcels. 19. The subject site is located in Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Water Availability. The site will have to meet City fire flow standards. 20. The City has adopted mitigation fees for transportation improvements, fire services and parks and recreational needs based on an analysis of the needs and costs of those services. These fees are applied to new development to help offset the impacts new homes and residents have on the existing community and the additional demand for services. 21. There are existing covenants that govern the earlier plat and therefore, the three lots the applicant proposes re -dividing under this review. Neighbors raised objections to the current proposal. They suggested that those covenants prevent re -dividing the property into smaller lots than the original lot sizes. CONCLUSIONS: This office is not in a position to judge the validity of the underlying covenants that cover the lots that comprise the subject site. The covenants were introduced by neighbors and it will be up to those neighbors to clarify with court action or negotiation how they apply to the subject site. There could be sufficient questions about their affect that they could cloud the title of the proposed lots but that is something that the applicant and future purchasers will have to weigh. The neighbors may always seek legal assistance or take legal action if they wish to pursue the issue outside of this forum. 2. The proposed plat, aside from the covenant issues, appears to serve the public use and interest. It will create additional lots in an area designated for suburban densities. While the comprehensive plan suggests lower density residential uses in this area and that is even demonstrated by the current, lower, R-4 zoning, the applicant took advantage of a window when the site was zoned R-8. They are permitted to seek development that matched the R-8 Zoning. The development will increase the demands on the City's parks, roads and emergency services. The applicant shall therefore help offset those impacts by providing mitigation that matches the fees established by the City. 4. The development will also increase the tax base of the City and that should help offset the more generalized impacts of the development on City services. The lots are all rectangular and all are larger than the minimum 5,000 square feet required for plats under one acre in older neighborhoods. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 7 6. The applicant will have to comply with general landscaping requirements as well as tree preservation and street tree requirements. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 2. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required. The TESCP shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual_ This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division_ A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family structure, shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4_ A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single-family residence shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. ORDERED THIS 18'1' day of January 2007 J� FRED J. KAUF HEARINGEXAAlkER TRANSMITTED THIS 18'h day of January 2007 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Development Services City of Renton Lola Archer 4904 NE 15' Court Renton, WA 98059 John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Homes 846-108`r' Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 NI? 1" Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE I" Street Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke Brian Westerbeck 4914 NE 1" Court P Box 1767 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98057 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-198'h Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-75'h Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Dave Jordan 4902 2'd SE Renton, WA 98059 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-145, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 186 day of January 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Larry Rude, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., February 1, 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An_ appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5_:00 p.m, February 1, 2007. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Project Location. 4900 block of SE 2nd Place W V 'J HIM MYi� ' fN.lRld �'. ps6wlP YI �.S �'Yti[M IiI1 d IV'7td1 6 i 40 � f + + 5 f f i + i r r ------------ _--------, ; i x i-----------------------! ,+ ------------------------------- x 41 CHIT RLotL tr 9Kl iG1.�7f10+ to 0 [ L 11 iill e S e * = a 7 V 1 —_ ,1 -Y - 4VIlIICJF rV1rC! V�R.iArJ H/-�i� r�1�� ` '� Mr�IV/tir raw - �atxr+- lertw[ s aw rNcrxr►�,ac - rur.rrrrc - e�•rrr�Mc - - EXHIBIT 2 REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SNORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARYAND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Report Date: January 25, 2007 Project Name Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat owner(s): Conner Homes Company; 846--108"' Avenue NE, Suite 202; Bellevue, WA 98004 contact: John Slkochdolpole, P.E.; Conner Homes Co.; 425A55-9280 File Number. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A Project Manager. Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for 2 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 2 parcels together are approximately 20,813 sf in size and would be subdivided into 3 lots suitable for single-family development. The parcels are currently undeveloped. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zone (R-4), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8). Continued next page Project Location: 902 Union Avenue Northeast, Renton, WA 98059 Project Location Map AWw SW Pit IAwd 0&14I (SP, 3dlu, R-M.doc City of Renton P/ UlPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT UA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY25, 2007 Page 2 of 11 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file {"yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map (November 15, 2006) Exhibit 3: Boundary and Topographic Survey (November 2006) Exhibit 4: Preliminary Short Plat (November 2006) Exhibit 5: Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 6: Preliminary Tree Cutting / Clearing Plan (November 2006) Exhibit 7: Preliminary Landscape Plan (November 2006) Exhibit S: Aerial Photograph Exhibil 9: Zoning Map (dated 12116106) C. GENERAL INFORMATION, f. Owner(s) of Record: Conner Homes Company: 846 —108th Avenue NE, Suite 202: Bellevue, WA 98004 2. Zoning Designation: Residential — 8 dulac (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single -Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: Undeveloped 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone East: Vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone South: One developed lot and one vacant lot (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone West: Single family residential use (Puget Colony subdivision), Residential 4 zone 6 Access: The access for the newly formed lots would be the same as for the existing lots, from Hoquiam Avenue NE via NE VI Street 7. Site Area: 20,813 square feet / 0.48 acre D. HISTORICAUBACICGROUND: Adtion Land Use FileOrd�ce No. Date Annexation N/A 5171 12105J2005 Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/01/2004 Zoning NIA 5171 12/05n005 Admin SW P t Report 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8),doc City of Renton Pla/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06.147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 26, 2007 E. PUBLIC SERVICES: Page 3 of 11 1. Utilities: Water: The site is outside the City of Renton water service area. Water District 90 supplies water service in this area. A icing County Certificate of Water Availability has been provided by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: There are no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to this site. There is a sanitary sewer lift station under construction approximately 200 feet to the east of this site. Service to the proposed plat would be available from this system. Stormwater: This site ties within the Maplewood Creek basin. There are storm drainage ditches in the vicinity of the site. 2. Streets: There is currently a paved pub#ic right-of-way abutting the property, but there are no streetlights, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavafion and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 44-130: Tree Gutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards S. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-050: General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat and Lot Line Adjustment Procedures Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120. Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150. Streets — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170. Residential Lots — General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 7. Chapter 11 Definitions G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element— Residential Single-family 2. Community Design Element Admin Shrt PW Repwt 06-147 (SP, 3du, R-8).doo City of Renton PABIPW Department Adminfstmilve Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 4 of 11 H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. _ Project Description/Back-ground The proposal is to subdivide 2 previously formed, but undevekaped lots in the Puget Colony plat into 3 lots. Puget Colony was subdivided In 1968 while under the jurisdiction of King County. The land has remained vacant due to several factors including, but not limited to, lack of wastewater service, high groundwater table, inability of the soils to accommodate septic sewer systems, and zoning. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single family residences. In 2005, the property was annexed into the City of Renton with Residential 8 (R-8) zoning, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre (dufa). In 2006, the City of Renton initiated a rezone to Residential 4 zoning. Prior to final adoption of this rezone, the applicant submitted a land use master application for this subdivision. The application was deemed complete prior to the R-4 zoning becoming effective. Therefore, the current review of the short plat application utilizes the development standards for the R-8 Zone. During the comment period, following posting notice of the proposed subdivision, staff received 5 comments from neighbors of the potential subdivision. Two comments were in favor of the proposed subdivision, two were opposed to the subdivision, and one expressed a desire for a similar subdivision of property in the vicinity. There are no known critical areas on the property. A Wetland and Stream Analysis was submitted with the application. This report was completed by Sewell Welland Consulting, Inc. based on field work done in October and November 2006, including the week following record rainfalls in the area. The methodology used is as described in the Washington State Wetlands identification Manual (March 1997), which is recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations. The Wetland and Stream Analysis indicates that no wetland hydrology was observed on the parcels. The topography of the site slopes down to the southeast, but does not have significant slopes. The land is vegetated primarily with cottonwood and fir trees. There are approximately 22 trees on the property that would be considered "significant" These include deciduous and evergreen trees 8 inches and larger in diameter at 4.5 feet above ground level. Excluded are populus, alnus, salix, and platanus species. The applicant intends to preserve 3 trees considered worthy of protection. An additional 3 trees must be planted to achieve the required ratio of protected trees retained or replaced. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted indicating that required landscaping would be provided at the front of each new lot. The 2 lots to be subdivided front on SE 2ro Street and (from west to east) consist of 10,200 sf and 10,613 sf each (approximately). The subdivision of these lots would result in 3 lots of (from west to east) the following acreages Lot Size (sf) Lot 1 7,092 Lot 2 6,912 Lot 3 6,809 Total 20,813 There are no private streets or easements proposed. Each lot would be accessed directly from SE 2nd Street by private driveways. 2. -Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or with sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a), 3. Corn liance with ERC Conditions NIA Adnnln Shn Pit Report 06-147(SP. 3du R-e),doc :f. Cu of Renton PWW Department Administrative Land Use Aotlon CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 4. Staff Review Comments Page 5 of 11 Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency with Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based on an evaluation using the following short plat criteria: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation Purpose Statement. Lands in the Residential Single Family Designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. Policies in this section are to be considered together with the policies in the Regional Growth, Residential Growth Strategy section of the Land Use Element, the Community Design Element, and the Housing Element. Policies are implemented with Residential 8 zoning. The proposed plat is consistent with the following Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies for Residential Single Family land use designation. Objective LU-FF. Encourage re -investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: 1) Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets; 2) Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. The project would provide an additional residential lot, which would somewhat further Growth Management targets. Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The three lots would have a density of 6.29 dwelling units per net acre, and therefore is within the preferred density range of the R-8 zone. Policy LU-149. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Lot areas do not Include easements. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element apply for the development of new lots in "established neighborhoods" Objective CD-C: Promote re -investment in and upgrade of existing neighborhoods through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property values. The proposed project would develop property that is currently vacant and result in the addition of street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, where none currently exist. Policy CD-10. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established neighborhoods, where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and, where practical, match existing sidewalks. Admin Shrt Pit Repon 0&147 (SP, 3(Ju,,R-8).doc of Renton PIS/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page B of 11 The development of the proposed new lots would result in street improvements that meet City of Renton standards where not existed previously. Policy CD-92. Infili development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. The proposed development would accomplish this policy goal. Policy CD-13. Inffll development should be reflective of the existing character of established neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and for responding to more urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of.enlries and walkways, to reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. Policy CD-14. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with other structures on the site and with adjacent development. Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria: a. Where there are differences In height (e.g., new two-story development adjacent to single -story structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the structure. b. Garages, whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of development established in the vicinity. c. Structures should have entries, windows, and doors located to maintain privacy in neighboring yards and buildings. The applicant will be asked to consider this policy when designing the structures. The following objectives and policies from the Community Design Element relate to landscaping: Objective CO-K: Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions, should include landscape plans. A landscape plan has been submitted and is required as a condition of plat approval Policy CD-45. Existing mature vegetation and distinctive trees should be retained and protected in developments. Trees and vegetation would be removed from the lots, with the exception of 3 trees to be retained. In addition, all pervious areas, except rear yards, are required to be landscaped and additional trees, both replacement trees and other required trees, would be planted, as per City of Renton code. This would compensate for the loss of vegetation to a certain extent. Policy CD-63. Landscape plans for proposed development projects should include public entryways, street rights -of -way, storm -water detention ponds, and all common areas. A landscape plan is required indicating that pervious areas of all lots, would be landscaped. b) Compliance with the Undedfying Toning Designation The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Net Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The R-8 zone is intended for single-family residential development that would add to the city's mix of residential styles including detached, single-family dwellings. The zone is intended to implement the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Development should be promoted in the zone that provides opportunities for detached single-family dwellings, ensures high -quality infill development, and maintains the single-family character of existing, established neighborhoods. Admin Shrt Prt Report 06-147 (SP, 3&4-9-8). dot ; :r City of Renton P/B(PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 4 SHORT PLAT LUA06.147, SHPL•A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 26, 2007 Page 7 of 11 The maximum density allowed in the R-8 zone is 8 dwelling units per net acre, there is no minimum density requirement on properties smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision_ Net density is calculated after the deduction from the gross acreage of the site of environmentally critical areas, areas intended for public right-of-way (with the exception of alleys), and private access easements. In this case, the applicant has a gross site area of 20,813 square feet, with no critical areas or other deductions. The resulting net density of the short plat would be 6.28 dwelling units per acre (310.48 = 6.28 dulac), which is within the density range allowed in the R-8 zone. The R-8 development standards require a15 foot front yard setback for the primary structure and 20 foot setback for the garage if it is accessed from the fronting street, a 5 foot side yard setback, and a 20 foot rear yard setback, The height limit is 2 stories and 30 feet. The maximum lot coverage by buildings is 35 percent or 2,500 sf for these lots because they are greater than 5,000 sf each. There are 22 significant or "protected" trees on the site, 3 are intended to be retained so in order to meet the requirement to preserve 25 percent of existing significant trees, replacement by 3 trees would be required. This replacement requirement is in addition to other required landscaping. Renton Municipal Code also requires two (2) new trees per lot. Landscaping along the frontage of NE 2nd Street and of all pervious areas of the residential lots would also be required (RMC 4-4-070). This landscaping must be irrigated by an underground automatic system, unless the use of drought -tolerant plants has been approved_ Staff recommends that a landscape plan, showing location of replacement trees as well as all required landscaping be submitted for approval to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: Street improvements, inciuding curb, gutter, and sidewalk would be required along SE 2rd Street. The applicant may apply for an "in lieu of [construction costs]" payment. Streetlights would not be required for this 3 lot short plat. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the plat must be undergrounded. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. The proposed short plat is anticipaled to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the project_ The new lots are expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips each. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $2,153.25 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 3 lots = $2,153.25) and is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Blocks: The proposed Short Plat does not create new blocks. Lot Standards, The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots must comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet for property smaller than 0.5 acre prior to subdivision_ All lots exceed the minimum size requirement by 1,800 sf or more. The lots appear to contain adequate buildable areas for the construction of suitable single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of building permit application for the new houses. The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. The lots would rneet the lot width and depth requirements. The lots are rectangular in shape and aligned in an urban pattern that is consistent with other lots in the immediate vicinity, as well as generally with the city as a whole. Admin Shd Pff Report 06-147 (Sf? 3du, R-S),doc City of Renton PIDIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 9 of 11 d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: All lots in a short plat must have access to a public street. All lots would continue to front on SE 2"d Street. Topography: The site slopes very gradually from northwest to southeast at an average grade of approximately 1 percent. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties on all sides of the site have been zoned Residential 4 since December 2006. Lots abutting to the south and east and one adjacent to the north are smaller than the undivided 2 lots (9,398 to 9,940 sf). Lots abutting to the west and adjacent across SE 2nd Street are about the same size as the undivided lots (10,080 to 10,800 sf). The density of the property to be subdivided with the surrounding abutting and adjacent properties is 4.34 dula. The proposal would result in development at a higher density than existing development in the area. The new density of this area would be 4.88 du/a. The density of the 3 new lots would be 6.28 du/a. The new lots would be located on a dead end (cut -de -sac) street and, therefore, have an impact more on the adjacent developed lots than the enfire Puget Colony subdivision. The new lots would be 49 feet wide abutting the street and 55 feet wide at the near property line, due to the configuration of the undivided lots. Lot dimensions can be met by averaging, therefore the lots would meet the development standard for minimum lot width. The abutting lots are approximately 74 feet wide along the street. The houses are set forward on the lots, are configured with the widest dimension parallel to the street, and have only about 5 feet between structures (King County development standards). For these reasons they have the appearance of greater density. They are, however, 1 story buildings and the new structures will be 2 stories each. This Y411 have a visual impact on the neighborhood, although it may not be significant to the extent that it would change the character of the neighborhood. As stated above, the project would meet Comprehensive Plan Community Design policy CD-12: "Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods." e) Avallability and impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention Bureau staffs indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM #ire flow is required wMin 300 feet of aff new single-family structures. If the building square footage of the house, including the garage, exceeds 3,600 sf in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and two hydrants will be required within 300 feet of the structures. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is payable prior to the recording of Die Final Plat. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16. 1992). the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single-famfly residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat could result in a single new student (0.44 X 3 lots =1.32) to the local schools. Renton School District has indicated it can accommodate additional students generated by this proposal at Maplewood Heights Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School. Surface Water: A drainage report was submitted and accepted with caWlations showing the project would be exempt from detention and water quality treatment in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. All other surface water Improvements including, but not limited to conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, driveway crossings and any frontage improvements are required to meet City of Renton standards. The Surface Water System Development Charge Is $759 per new dwelling unit. This fee is due with the construction permit Admin Shrt AVt Report 06-147 (SP, 3du. R 0�doc a: City of Renton PM/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY t SHORT PLAT _ LUA06.147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2tto7 Page 9 of 11 Water: The King County Certificate of Water Availability from Water district 90 must verify that minimum fire flow requirements are met (hydrants within 300 feet and 1,000 gpm flow). The Certificate of Water Availability must be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to recording the Final Plat. Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Each lot would require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the Final Plat. The Sewer System Development Charge is $1.017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. A Sewer Assessment District (East Renton) fee in the amount of $316.801per unit would be due at the time a construction permit is issued. 1. Findings: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The applicant has requested Administrative Short Plat Approval for the Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A. 2. Application: The applicant's submittal complies with the requirements for information for a short plat. The applicant's short plat plan and other project drawings are contained within the official land use file. 3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations of the Residential Single Family (RSF) land use designation. 4. Zoning: Although the area of the proposed subdivision is zoned Residential -4, the proposed project is vested, due to timely application, to the previous zoning of Residential-8. The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential 8 zoning designation, provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations, provided the applicant complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential single family (zoned R4); East: Vacant land (zoned 13 4); South: Residential single family and vacant land (zoned R4); and West: Residential single family (zoned R4). 7. Setbacks: The setbacks for the new houses on the proposed lots would be verified at the time of building permit review. 8. System Development Charges: A Surface Water System Development Charge and Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the new single-family lots at the time of issuance of the construction permits, 9. Public Udiitres4mprovements: Improvements will be required for the public street (SE 2nd Street), including curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Individual sewer and water stubs must be installed to serve the new lots. Adequate fire hydrants must be installed, and any existing and new fire hydrants must be fitted with 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fittings. 1. Conclusions: 1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) Comprehensive Plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is vested by timely application to the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions are compiled with prior to submitting for Final Plat approval, including requirements of the City of Renton Property Services Division (which will be provided to applicant under separate cover). Admin Shrt P* Report 06-147 (Sr? 3* R-B)Voc Clly of Renton PIBIPW De rtment Administrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06-147, SHPL-A REPORT AND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25, 2007 Page 10 of 11 3. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law provided the applicant comply with all advisory notes and conditions. 4. The proposed 3 lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. J. DECISION: The Conner Puget Colony 1 Short Plat, File No. LUA-06-147, SHPL-A is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscape plan shall be submitted indicating proposed location, size, and type of replacement trees (trees to replace removal of protected trees). Required landscaping, including two trees to be located on each new lot (in addition to replacement trees), shall be indicated on the landscape plan. The landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to recording the Final Plat. 2. A Transportation Impact fee for each lot, estimated at $2.153.25, shall be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 3. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family lot shall be required prior to the recording of the final plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: t Gre99A. Zlm rma , P/B/ Adndrdsfrator TRANSMITTED this 25' day of January, 2007, to the ChmerlAppkcanUContact: John Stwchdolpole, P.E_ Conner Homes Company 846--108' Ave NE, #202 Bellevue WA 98004 7RANSMi TTED this 25' day of January, 2007. to the Parties of Record.' Michele Fjebnd Karen & F-Jay Cook Shannon & Doug Luedtke 5016 SE 2nd Street 4910 NE 1" Court 4914 5E 2" d Street Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98059 Renton INA 98059 TRANSMITTED this 2e day of January, 2007. to the following: Larry Mec", BuilMg Official Larry Rude, Fire Marshal Nell Watts, Development Services director Jennifer Henning, Planning ManaW K.*V n lC)ttridc, l)evelolXnWl Engineering Supervisor Jan Conklin. Development Services Carrie Olson, Development Services AdmM Shrf Plf Report 06-147 (SP, 300, 17-8).dw a Derision date Brian Westerbeck P.O. Box 1767 Renton WA 98057 City of Renton P(BtPw Department Admintstrative Land Use Action CONNER PUGET COLONY 1 SHORT PLAT LUA06.147, SHPL-A REPORTAND DECISION DATED JANUARY 25. 2007 Page 11 of 1i Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision Is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-d2y appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3), WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision If material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or 4 he finds there was misrepresentation of fad. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will became final if not appealed in writing to the Blearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on February 8, 2007. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, (425) 43U-f510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M_ ADVISORYNOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as fnfotmation only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. 1. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a.m. and 6-00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 1. All plats are required by City code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. This distance is measured along a travel route. If the proposed single-family structures exceed 3,600 sq. Q., the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. Additional fire hydrants may be required as a part of this project to meet this criterion. The fire hydrants must meet all current City of Renton standards. 2. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. Min Rovoinur — 4fnrml1Qi orFnrn Wmf, r 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $759.00 per single-family lot is payable prior to final plat recording. r Ep11 FwriyW -yu vvw 1. All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat_ 2. Any damage incurred to the street, curbs, gutters, or sidewalks by this project must be repaired. Plan Review —Sewer 1. This site is located in the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD 0002). These fees are $316.80 per new connection, These fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) are $1,017.00 per new unit. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued and prior to recording the final plat. 3. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%_ Dual side sewers are not allowed. The existing side sewer may need to be relocated to better serve the short plat and new building foundations. 4_ This project is not required to install a sanitary sewer main. The conceptual utility plan needs to be modified to reflect this (delete the sewer main from the project plans). 5. The applicant is responsible for securing the necessary easements to serve this short plat with sanitary sewer. Plan Review — General 1. All required utility, drainage and street Improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. Z. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs: 4% of anything over $100.000, but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the construction permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See drafting standards. 1. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton horizontal and vertical control network. Adm1n Shrt Pit Report 0& 147 (SP, 3du, R-P dWt ... 'y '. a #S E. 131ST sr.} @ ,� ., {31 ,_. E67 A ''" C60 .t S_P_ 8810 (4) i 3ol O 1 EIJ� I c In S. eoaee r.s Ac o O �& 6# R 60Em S.1 we } r x. �O 6OL15 I SOT) rQ 4 25 Jill t 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 d f in I N 17 Is.r crib t S I� 0 20,8 21 22 23 26 4 d 3F 30 29 2B Y7 86 28 F � sup I az is rt� ST, -P 33 34 36 37 38 39 40 0 Z 29 M 41 1 46 455 44 43 42 41 L _ 48 !� i V J 49 so 51 s2 s3 32 I i z 0 a a 61 60 39 58 57 sr OLT GM g e 6Q xff 1$ A - SE 2ND PkL, : [f} 1 � 7 � D 1 462 Ac. � ►� I E HMIT �. 1 W xi 2 3 RAI : N —Q4�t� r -s$ ' . lrrri < I 11 I \ !f Y Off u I;r r 1 i I i 1.5 I 1 � 1 ^ry r 1 i ! 1 �• , Y1 I , N O f r .a f 1 1 f 1 � t: a ; f � N H M I: Jit' 0o9vre:tre or i f I r s I �- ■r,e — — — — — — — — — — — — — II— — -..--------`� ______________________________ 1 1 f Ry� f I I JER I i M_ i 3r I f IL Jill I I I , 1 I ra-r 2/plllw I i t I r 1 � I • . i i I , I '• . 1 I I ' t 1 I i i I f 1 I g 1 I r I f � I - , tifr 9MIABAISt - 611MIN•11 • ONRirtate I /OIIIIAm w ,anlu tlil��tiNlgllM � AlR{/1= vM/ dlVWJAawsA&VAWWVW HIII 5 N ck 1h. LIM' U;Z �--Vkv nvvgm it -� i4 ---- _-- - --t --+----------------------- I I I I 1 f 1 1 r ; 1 ; 1 ` 1 f , ! lwrlew 1 ' ' 1 1 L.__-_-- --v----------J I ' 1 i3 I I ---------- - i 1 --------------- i � f 1 r e I 1 1 1 I i 1 � ! 1 1 I f 1 ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 I ; F 1 1 ! r 1 1 I'a -Mom ' axex.va Allltl .lr'.r+.v �► +rnwnlrr+w a� ' rDili 0 $ E� St �Y S al € r is x Y •Irlcuaac • awlllllr�. - ewlrratlreollY 'Rrrac u� •oaeY - �7R y1'/I/K y� Nyry a/M�� Nlp/RR.Y�aPIlI�1 .�as1W Ryy .rw.ea.`II�'. ilYxdl �N lR4?J kl I91GKi a r�hoVPW H 1-4 e elf 1— 7N 'KV PIV MW 1 7N 3AV MYIOD044 h Ad Vl e Renton --- Renton City Limits Parcels SCALE 1 : 1,162 100 0 100 2M 300 FEET hapJ/, I re*�mLorWMapGukWmapsRarce1-mwf N ;1 EXHIBIT 8 Tuesday.-Ja6uW 23j�-M7 10:45 AM Eb • 10 T23N �. . �"„ R—a . CR �L ] R--10 R—$ ; R-4 R- 4 CAR-1 4 F2 4 , i - 4 -ODE R GA R R-Q R —8 Y R- R 4 i _ NR ._ s; NE 2i. °� 'nt ' fir$ .G$ '_ _'�_• 1 -=a R ;U. IR a3 1fv �. SE R d P) i R`4 ILw .r, 1 I C SE I SE cf) i .� SE 142nd a� w -cI X4 SE 145th PI. EXMBXT C16 - 22 TMN R5E E 14 9 �23N � UZ�,5 ME E 1/2 axn�nos .y, February 26, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 62 Citizen Comment: Charnley - Timothy Charnley, 14140 SE 171st Way, Apt. E204, Renton, 98058, said the Wonderland Estates Mobile owner of the Wonderland Estates Mobile Home Park property is 10 percent of Home Park, Zoning and the way through the permitting process in King County. He expressed concern Annexation that unless King County and Renton enter into an interlocal agreement, the zoning will remain at R-12 for the property. Councilmembcr Conran stated that an interlocal agreement is not needed as the Council reserves the privilege to zone the property at the time it comes into Renton. Responding to Mr. Charnley's inquiry, Planning Manager Lind said the zoning text amendment change request for the property had been pending before the Planning and Development Committee due to an appeal that was filed. She noted that the appeal was recently withdrawn, and the matter will be brought back to Council for consideration. Citizen Comment: Jackson - David Jackson, 2419 Talbot Crest Dr. S., Renton, 98055, spoke on the topic of Jet Center at Airport the Renton Airport expansion. He noted the increased amount of air traffic that was experienced in Renton due to the closure of Boeing Field in August 2006. He expressed concern regarding the proposals that cater to corporate and private jets, saying that the environment of the Talbot Hill neighborhood will deteriorate as a result of the proposed airport expansion. Mr. Jackson urged Council to reject proposals to expand the airport above its current level, and he requested that the City consider applying larger landing fees for older generation jet engine aircraft. Councilmember Clawson pointed out that there is no expansion of the airport planned. Citizen Comment: Kawamura - Linda Kawamura, 17907 123rd Ct. SE, Renton, 98058, stated that she lives in Benson Hill Communities the Benson Hill communities annexation area and wants the opportunity to vote Annexation, S 200th St & to annex to the City of Renton. 128th Ave SE CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 2/12/2007. Council concur. 2/ 12/2007 Appeal: Puget Colony Homes City Clerk reported appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Puget Short Plat, Cook, SHP-06-146 Colony Homes Short Plat; appeal filed by Frank Jay Cook, 4910 NE 1st Ct., Renton, 98059, accompanied by the required fee. The appeal packet included one additional letter from John R. Skochdopole as allowed by City Code. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. CAG: 05-194, Community Community Services Department submitted CAG-05-194, Renton Community Center Storage Room Center Storage Room Additions; and requested approval of the project, Additions, Flag Construction authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $4,376.21, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $7,994.55 to Flag Construction Company, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Community Services: Fire Community Services Department requested approval of a sole source contract in Station #1 I Vehicle Exhaust the amount of $53,170.56 with Benz Air Engineering Co., Inc. to install a Extraction, Benz Air Nederman Vehicle Exhaust Extraction System at Fire Station #11. Council Engineering concur. Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Staff Contact...... i Y OF RENTON COUNCIL AGEND . ILL r Al AJLS/City Clerk Bonnie 1. Walton Subject: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 1 / 18/2007 regarding the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application. (File No. LUA-06-146, SHP) Exhibits: A. Applicant letter/response to appeal (2/16/2007) B. City Clerk's letter (2/712007) C. Appeal - Frank Jay Cook (1126/2007) D. Hearing Examiner's Report & Decision (I/18/2007 For Agenda of: 2/26/2007 Agenda Status Consent ........... ... Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance............ Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business...... Study Sessions..... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Planning and Development Committee, Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision on the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application was filed on 1/26/2007 by Frank Jay Cook, accompanied by the required $75 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council to take action on the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application appeal. cc: Jennifer Henning Larry Warren AentonnetlagnbilU bb KI CITY OF REIVTON (j V N N E R 14 FEB February 16, 2007 Y 9 2007 RECENED • Renton City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, th Floor Renton, WA 98055 RE: Frank Jay Cook Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision of 1/18/2007 regarding the Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. (Renton Hie No. LUA06-146, SHPL-H), and of the Administrative decision on 1/25/2007 regarding the Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2nd Street. (Renton File No. LUA06-147, SHPL-A) Dear Distinguished Members of Council, Please consider this correspondence the permitted letter in support of our position, provided for in RMC Section 4-8-110F, on the subject of the referenced filed appeals. Our position is that the decision of the Hearing Examiner should be upheld on LUA06- 146, and that the Administrative decision be upheld on LUA06-147, and the appeal for the reversal of the decision be denied in both cases. The same position applies to both Cases. We.want to elaborate on the restriction that Mr. Co 7 i opinion, not considered in the proper light by r0a handled correctly in the decision, Mr. Cook cites a tide report for his property i:ie same subdn from b2812- the early 1970's in which a "covenant" Wad 11st�etf a 'Ile excepti r Pugety properties. This covenant did not nda does no His title c ror, as vf- is supported by the updated tit re filed wit sho application pac is, title company misprinted the frig originally includ 'n the face of the final plat``a document, and also mislabel s wording as a c _A plat restriction.AW The hearing examiner's re it ludes'the pe t language. On page h 7, the testimony of Elizabeth, s states the ty of what Mr. Coo ' ous title a. report offered, namely (p sed here) th ..no lot... in this e divided... whereby the owe of any porti this plat shall than the area required f erse dis,rict stated e p lat. next paragraph on page then' proe4,6s the correct From the face of the on al t. Namely, ( raphrased), t... in this plat shall be livid reby the own rship of a n of.�,, this plat shall be less tha ea required the use in w. located," 846 I08th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 425 455 9280 www.connerhomes.com K The plat restriction, being all that applies, is a standard note widely used in King County in that time period. The restriction simply means that there can be no lot line adjustments or further subdivisions of lots that create ANY parcels smaller than the CURRENT zoning code allows, not the original zoning. This is appreciably different than the non-existent language created by Mr. Cook's title company. As established, the zoning in effect of the time of our application and vesting was R-8, making us consistent with that plat restriction. It is actually a redundant stipulation, in that that premise is anywhere that there is zoning jurisdiction. Be that as it may, it is still there and that is all that it means. Staff took it upon themselves to further investigate the circumstances behind this particular plat note for this particular property and found nothing unique in the County's preliminary plat file for Puget Colony. Ms. Higgins' testimony at the Hearing so stated that as well. The examiner mentioned that it is not the City's business to enforce private covenants. That is not the nature of the subject plat restriction. It Is not private, but as we have outlined above it is not that the restriction should not apply in this case, it is that it is not a private covenant. It is a plat restriction, a condition for the consummation of the underlying subdivision, and we are in compliance. We broached this subject with Staff prior to making our application and were told the restriction was not prohibiting us from subdivision, given the current zoning. Unfortunately we do not have that communication exchange in writing. The second issue that Mr. Cook raises is easily addressed by a review of the land use file record. It shows that there was a complete application filed in a timely manner so as to vest the application to the R-8 zoning in effect for the property for a period following annexation. Mr. Cook believes that the filing should have included additional studies and materials, but the application did indeed comply with City requirements for completeness. Staff and the Hearing Examiner both also acknowledged and stated that fact. Thank you for your attention. We look forward to the City's decisions on the appeals. Respectfully Submitted, 4NN R.'Skochdopole, P.E. ER HOMES COMPANY Project Manager APPLICANT L,t r ,-. Kathy Keolker, Mayor February 7, 2007 APPEAL FILED BY: Frank Jay Cook CIT : OF RENTON City Clerk Bonnie I. Walton RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 1/18/2007 regardin ;the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2° Place. (File No. LUA- 06-146, S HP) To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11017, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal_ Other parties of record may submit letters limited to support of their positions within ten (10) days of the date of mailing of the notification of the filing of the appeal. The deadline for submission of additional letters is 5:00 pm, February 19, 2007. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council Liaison will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council Liaison at 425-430-6501 for information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached are a copy of the appeal and a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at 425-430-6502. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Attachments cc: Council Liaison 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425) 43 0-65 10 / FAX (425) 430-6516 This papercontains50% recycled material,30%postoonsumer . RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE JAN 2 b RECEIVEt� APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISIONIRECOMMENDATIM CLERICS OFFIt, TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL FILE NO. L UA -ClG -1 X$a -jV , fp4wgZ'r rcu.olvWy .00Wr 1PLhT'- APPLICATION NAME The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommer dFfft" Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated , 20---. JAN ` 2Q�7 .` i. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: Name: — Cad Address: 6 ecru-rr„ , &PN 9 s1 REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY): Name: Address: CLERICS RECEIVED OFFICE 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: & FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's Report) K &Xr No. Error. Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction: OTHER: No. Error: Correction: 3. UUMMM"Y OF ACTION REQUESTED The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other Appellant/Represekativi Signature D NOTE: Please refer to Me IV, Chapter8, of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-110F, for specific appeal prOODWras. H:%Crff CLERKIAPPEALIAPPEAL to Comii.doe e t e v , v1 Ce r L.(� �, �e S S Dr,� 27; 20 P�-t I rl~"f/ 2rj I zrt C CITY OF RENTON JAN 2 6 2007 I� 24 RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE City of Renton Municipal Code; Title IV Chapter 8 Section 110 — ApMls 4-8-1 I0C4 The notice of appeal shall-be�accornpanied by a fee'in accordan, a with kMel -170, the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-1 I OF: Appeals to City Council — Procedures 1. Tide for Appeal: Unless a specific section or State law providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court or any other body, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Council, upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. , 2. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five (5) days of receipt of the ndti ee of hppeml the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of that 4pe4 . ' ' 3. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties_ of record may submit letters ip gupport of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates ofmailitig of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 4. of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-1982) 5. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The CW of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the applicant In the absence of an entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is idean6cal to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. Mai 4389, 1-25-1993) b. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 7. Findings and Conclusions Required: If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to RIv1C 4-1-050F1, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceeding to Exanuner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 8. Council Action: If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to RMC 4-1-050172 and F3, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 9. Decision Documentation: In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with ft appellant, (Ord 3658, 9-13-1982) Id Gm neil Action Mid:. ` .a iw.oi the Council approving, modifyink or rejab ing a-+deeiiaa of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless appealed within the time frames established under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) January 18, 2007 OFFICE OF THE IIEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANTICONTACT: OWNERS: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Homes 846-108"' Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038 —198" Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507 —75" Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 4900 block of SE 2"d Place Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 0.79 acre parcel into five (5) lots for the future construction of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 3, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 9, 2007 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 9:14 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.. LUA-06-146, SHP--i. January 18, 2007 Page 2 Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Short Plat Map Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Plan Preliminary Tree Cutting/Clearing Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 8: Rezone Ma Exhibit No. 9: Aerial Photograph Exhibit No. 10: Schedule B of Title Report Exhibit No. 11. Puget Colony 2 Plat Face Exhibit No.12: Typed sheet with restrictions from the face of the Plat Exhibit No. 13: County Preliminary Plat Action from King Exhibit No. 14: Letter from Seattle King County Department of Public Health Department Exhibit No.15: Titleheport for Archer The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing a sub- division of three lots located in northeast Renton. There are two owners of the three existing lots. The lots abut on SE 2'd Place and if the application is approved, will be subdivided into five new lots. The lots were located in Residential-8 Zone at the time the application was submitted, the area has since been rezoned to Residential4, however, the lots will comply with the R-8 zoning designation. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Single -Family. The sites have not been previously developed due to the high ground water table in the area and the. fact that the septic systems would not function. The lots can now be developed due to the fact that sewers will be installed. This short plat application was not subject to review by the Environmental Review Committee. There are no known critical areas on the property. A wetland and stream analysis was submitted with the application. The site slopes down to the southeast corner of the property, drainage will flow in this direction into an existing system. The applicant has indicated that they will attempt to save trees existing along the north property line, the rest of the vegetation will be removed. The conceptual landscape plan was submitted. The plan shows street trees, they are very small and will be in the front yards of the new lots. The new five lots would be 6,600 square feet or larger which is above the minimum lots size required in this zone. The lots meet all of the zoning development standards for width, depth, lot size and potential setbacks. The subdivision also meets the comprehensive plan designation objectives and policies for subdivision of land and for the community design element policies. A net density of 6.25 dwelling units per acre for the site is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone. The new lots will be accessed via driveways off of NE 2°a Place. There are plans by the City to improve NE 2d Place, there is a school in the vicinity and several parks which people access via NE 2"d Place. The applicant has agreed to pay Street Improvement costs in lieu of actually doing the improvements. This allows the City to retain some consistency with the street designs. Staff recommended Park, Fire and Transportation Fees be required as a condition of approval. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHP,.,-rI January 18, 2007 Page 3 There are no sanitary sewer Iines to the property, there is a lift station under construction and these lots would be served by the new sanitary sewer system. There would be an East Renton Sewer Assessment District Fee imposed on each lot and sewer system development charges for both wastewater and surface water. The applicant has received a Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90. John Skochdopole, Conner Homes, 846-108ffi Ave NE, Suite 202, Bellevue, WA 98004 stated that he is the project manager. That is Field Street to the west of the project and is rather fragmented. He believes the City's intent is to not improve that street. Frank Cook, 4910 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 thanked the City for the rezone of this area, it is unfortunate that the effective date allows this project to fall under the prior zone designation. He checked the filings and believes that several shortcuts have been taken that should not have been taken. Secondly, the Puget Colony homes were platted as R4 in King County in 1968, the only reason it was changed to R-8 was the growth management plan that received very little review from the citizens and residents in this area_ They have asked that Renton review this process and with over a year of thorough analysis they came to the conclusion that this should be R4. The residents believe that this area should remain consistent with the R4 zoning designation. Lola Archer, 4904 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated her concerns were many, first the regrading. She lives adjacent to Laurelhurst and now has a rock wall better than nine feet tall with a more than six-foot fence on top of it that abuts her backyard. She is concerned with the regarding that would be done with this new project and what the difference is between three homes and five. It seems that this project should be consistent with the rest of the community. After researching through King County files, she found that it stated that the area was not to be subdivided to smaller areas. Al Dembowski, 4906 NE 15` Street, Renton, WA 98059 questioned that in a situation where there is a covenant or statement that lots cannot be subdivided, if that has any meaning at all, does it apply in this instance? He would request a delay in the Hearing Examiner's decision in order to determine if there is any significance to that issue. When the density is changed, the character of this particular area is changed. Karen Cook, 4910 NE I` Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that as the presentation came about she noted that on Exhibit 6, which showed the trees, there is not way that those trees can be saved. When the homes are built on these small lots, they will completely fill the lots. She also thought that the square footage that is show on the report is incorrect. The total square footage from King County records shows 33,670 square feet, the City of Renton shows 34,374 square feet. Elizabeth Higgins, introduced Schedule B of a Title Report provided by Mr. Cook to the Long Range Planning Division, Item 3 of Schedule B states "restrictions contained in said plat as follows: no lot or portion of lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on the plat." The second thing she received from the applicant at the time of application is the face of the plat, recording number with King County is in the lower left hand corner. The restriction states, "no lot or portion of a lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located." This question was put to the City Attorney who said that since it was platted in King County, one of the problems is that it doesn't say when this restriction applied or if it was the zoning at the time the Puget Colony was platted or the zoning in perpetuity, there is no indication of whether it could never be rezoned. The City Attorney's opinion was that the King County records would have to be reviewed. The preliminary plat action for Puget Colony homes was dated November 14, 1967 and states that, "it was moved and seconded that the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHP---a January I8, 2007 Page 4 preliminary plat be approved and that the following conditions be applied: 1. Compliance with all platting regulations of a resolution and subject to standard conditions of preliminary plat approval. 2. All lots to meet the minimum requirements of the RS-9600 lot size of plats located in the S-R areas. 3. There is to be no direct vehicular access to 1400' Avenue SE from those Iots which abut it." There were only three conditions. After further searching, the Seattle King County Department of Public Health, dated November 20, 1967 there was a letter regarding the soil conditions. This stated that development of the property must be in accordance with the conditions set forth in the engineers report on file. The concern with the lots is whether they would perk or not for septic systems. All that can be inferred about the restriction on the size of the lot was the concern about the septic systems and the soil conditions. Karen Cook stated that she had the actual Policy of Title Insurance, which was dated July 9, 1973. John_Skochdopole stated that they researched this issue before making application. There is no separate covenant that covers the Puget Colony lots other than that which is written on the face of that plat. That is a standard King County note and was for a very long time, it was used on all plats that served septic, at least through the 70's, 80's and early 90's. Ms.. Himins defined all the setbacks for each of the new lots. Lot I is a corner lot whether or not a street exists and therefore must have wider setbacks than the interior lots. Ms. Archer stated that this development should go back to R4 in order to maintain the community as it was. Kavren Kittrick, Development Services stated that a plan was submitted under the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. They are exempt because what is coming off the site is going to be under the threshold for having to do on -site retention/detention. They will be monitoring it very closely because of the high water table and everything else that is going on in that vicinity. The final TIR will be done in the course of the final review of this site. The grading is limited due to saving the trees in that corner. They cannot do much in the way of grading, the ground if fairly flat. There can be no more or no less water coming off the site. Erosion is watched very closely. The City has discussed building their own erosion control manual in order to catch controls that are not covered on the broad scope of King County. Regarding the septic systems, the City of Renton does not determine if a property goes from septic to sewer. Septic is allowed if sewer is not buildable and that would be under the control of the King County Health Department, not the City of Renton. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:26 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS. 1. The applicant, John Skochdopole, filed a request for a Short Plat. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 5 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. The subject site is on the north side of SE 2nd Place just east of 140th Avenue SE (King County designation) or Field Avenue. Staff reported that 140th Avenue is an unopened street and it would probably not be opened. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Pla« designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R.4 (Single Family - 4 dwelling units/acre). The application for this development apparently was submitted while the subject site was still zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre) and therefore, the applicant is entitled to develop the subject site under R-8 zoning - a legal entitlement called "vesting." (See below regarding Covenants) 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5171 enacted in December 2005. 9. The subject site is approximately 34,374 square feet or 0.79 acres. The parcel is approximately 245 feet wide (east to west) by approximately 130 feet deep. The subject site consists of three (3) underlying lots that are approximately 11,960 square feet, I2,090 square feet and 9,620 square feet. I0. The subject site does not contain significant slopes but does slope down toward the southeast. The applicant proposes balancing cut and fill if possible. Any fill material would be subject to analysis. 11. A tree survey showed 21 significant trees, Staff has noted that five trees would have to be maintained. The applicant proposes retaining some trees located on the northwest portion of the subject site. 12. The applicant proposes re -dividing the existing three lots into five lots. The lots, Proposed Lots 1 to 5, would be aligned from west to east. 13. Access to the individual lots would be straightforward - directly from SE 2nd Place. The right-of-way immediately west of the plat would be Field Avenue SE but it is a fragmented roadway and not proposed for access. The applicant proposes paying a fee -in -lieu of developing frontage improvements along SE 2nd Place. This will allow the City to provide consistent improvements along that street. 14. The density for the plat would be 6.25 dwelling units per acre. This complies with the R-8 zoning that was in effect when the application was accepted. 15. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 2 schooI age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHI —.1 January 18, 2007 Page 6 16. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 50 trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 5 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 17. Stormwater detention is not required according to the analysis submitted by the applicant but this will be checked further depending on circumstances. 18. A high water table had prevented the development of the underlying lots as a suitable septic system could not be developed. The site will now be served by sewer, which allows development of the parcels. 19. The subject site is located in Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Water Availability. The site will have to meet City fire flow standards. 20. The City has adopted mitigation fees for transportation improvements, fire services and parks and recreational needs based on an analysis of the needs and costs of those services. These fees are applied to new development to help offset the impacts new homes and residents have on the existing community and the additional demand for services. 21. There are existing covenants that govern the earlier plat and therefore, the three lots the applicant proposes re -dividing under this review. Neighbors raised objections to the current proposal. They suggested that those covenants prevent re -dividing the property into smaller lots than the original lot sizes. CONCLUSIONS: This office is not in a position to judge the validity of the underlying covenants that cover the lots that comprise the subject site. The covenants were introduced by neighbors and it will be up to those neighbors to clarify with court action or negotiation how they apply to the subject site. There could be sufficient questions about their affect that they could cloud the title of the proposed lots but that is something that the applicant and future purchasers will have to weigh. The neighbors may always seek legal assistance or take legal action if they wish to pursue the issue outside of this forum. 2. The proposed plat, aside from the covenant issues, appears to serve the public use and interest. It will create additional lots in an area designated for suburban densities. While the comprehensive plan suggests lower density residential uses in this area and that is even demonstrated by the current, lower, R-4 zoning, the applicant took advantage of a window when the site was zoned R-8. They are permitted to seek development that matched the R-8 Zoning. 3. The development will increase the demands on the City's parks, roads and emergency services. The applicant shall therefore help offset those impacts by providing mitigation that matches the fees established by the City. 4. The development will also increase the tax base of the City and that should help offset the more generalized impacts of the development on City services. S. The lots are all rectangular and all are larger than the minimum 5,000 square feet required for plats under one acre in older neighborhoods. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-A January 18, 2007 Page 7 6. The applicant will have to comply with general landscaping requirements as well as tree preservation and street tree requirements. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 2. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required. The TESCP shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume H of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family structure, shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single-family residence shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. ORDERED THIS 18'4 day of January 2007 FRED J. KAUF HEARING E R TRANSMITTED THIS I8`s day of January 2007 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Development Services City of Renton Lola Archer 4904 NE 1 ' Court Renton, WA 98059 John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Homes 846-108`t' Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 ONE I s` Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE I" Street Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke Brian Westerbeck 4914 NE Ir" Court P Box 1767 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98057 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-198" Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-75" Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Dave Jordan 4902 2°a SE Renton, WA 98059 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHP— January 18, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 180'day of January 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Larry Rude, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, re u t for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.. February 1, 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 pm., February 1, 2007. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. P1ro ea Locef on_ 4900 Mock of SE 2n° Place PC 2 chi PM alanr •Omwwvla ONIaaaNf?M �,...,,I v.,y '� zlvral�o►�cs 1 tfMJAYOAfS a s R 11411,1rl_ .. el --------------J., _-________ r-------------------aw -----i 1 1 1 1 1 t r l______________________ ii ------------ J 1 i 1 1 1 �ii r � r 1 r f r 1= 1 1 1 1 1 ` 'I 1 r 1 [ k�� 1 ; li 1 ---------------^`"----""� 1 I ; ae gg ------------------------- 1 1 1 1 r 1 r F 1 1 f 1 ! x !s --------------ti-- --- --------------------------- 1 ; 3s "Lott ug141 xrs,eC.onl/ - FIN To: Elizabeth Higgins / Senior Planner From: David R. JorDan Subject: Rezoning / LUA-06-147-SHPL-A Date: 02/16/07 CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 0 2007 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE MN (Tecei'ved pas5e4/ dead lige -fir 1 4�p�a! ca�me��• 1 As a meter of record I believe you should oppose any zoning changes to lots within Puget Colony. 1. Puget Colony was initially developed as a neighborhood based on R-4. 2. I purchased my home in Puget Colony because of the neighborhood. 3. When I bought, there were many undeveloped lots. 4. 1 am not opposed to building on the undeveloped lots. 5. The planned density of Puget Colony was a major factor in moving there. 6. The density of my neighborhood had been established by a legally binding building permit. 7. I understand that the law allows for a petition to change our zoning. I look to my representation in local government to protect my rights, and uphold the zoning that allowed the creation of the neighborhood I invested in. I would expect you to protect the home owners in LAURELHURST on Duvall St. from placing a home like mine on two lots in the middle of their neighborhood; likewise: I expect you to protect the residence of Puget Colony from rezoning that invades our neighborhood with higher density lots. David R. JorDan. -1 �/i6 P, 4)'a� 5-� Y CIT' - OF RENTON +- + City Cleric Kathy Keolker, Mayor Bonnie I. Walton February 7, 2007 APPEAL FILED BY: Frank Jay Cook RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision dated 1/18/2007 regardin� the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2° Place. (File No. LUA 06-146, SHP) To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11017, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters limited to support of their positions within ten (10) days of the date of mailing of the notification of the filing, of the appeal. The deadline for submission of additional letters is 5:00 pm, February 19, 2007. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council Liaison will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council Liaisonat 425-430-6501 for information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached are a copy of the appeal and a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at 425-430-6502. Sincerely, Bonnie I, Walton City Clerk Attachments cc: Council Liaison 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425) 430-65101 FAX (425) 430-6516 0 Thispapercontains50% recycled matenal,3096post consumer RENTQN AHEAD OF THE CURVE Attorneys E Counselors at Lnn' April 11, 2007 Terri Briere, Chair c/o Julia Medzegian Planning & Development Committee Renton City Council 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 8 2007 RECEIVED OITY OLERKS OFFICE Re Puget Colony Short Plat Application LUA 06-146, SHP Dear Committee Chair Briere: RMdved APR 1. 2 2007 REWON CITY COUNdI Please be advised that his law firm has been retained to represent Frank "Jay" Cook and Karen Cook in reference to the above captioned matter. A hearing on the Cook's appeal is currently scheduled for Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. I am requesting an approximate 2 week continuance, or until as soon thereafter as this matter can be calendared for a continued hearing. I have spoke with Ann S. Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney, and she does not object to my request for a continuance. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, J. Scott Ralston cc : Clients Ann S. Nielsen (via fax (425) 255-5474) 3470 Carill.,ri. Poini Mrkland.. Washingion 98033 rio r 425.803 L}'_,00 1.,� ,i - 7 t 5 4 EMAIL olffce@hlg`a-eali}}las.com aW CITY OF RENTON February 16, 2007 FEB 19 2007 RECEIVED Renton City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, 7�' Floor Renton, WA 98055 COINER RE: Frank Jay Cook Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision of 1/18/2007 regarding the Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. (Renton File No. LUA06-146, SHPL-H), and of the Administrative decision on 1/25/2007 regarding the Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2nd Street. (Renton File No. LUA06-147, SHPL-A) Dear Distinguished Members of Council, Please consider this correspondence the permitted letter in support of our position, provided for in RMC Section 4-8-110F, on the subject of the referenced filed appeals. Our position is that the decision of the Hearing Examiner should be upheld on LUA06- 146, and that the Administrative decision be upheld on LUA06-147, and the appeal for the reversal of the decision be denied in both cases. The same position applies to both cases. We want to elaborate on the restriction that Mr. Cook broaches, and that was, in our opinion, not considered in the proper light by the Examiner at the hearing, though handled correctly in the decision. Mr. Cook cites a title report for his property in the same subdivision from back in the early 1970's in which a "covenant" was listed as a title exception for Puget Colony properties. This covenant did not and does not exist. His title company was in error, as is supported by the updated title report filed with our short plat application package. His title company misprinted the wording originally included on the face of the final plat document, and also mislabeled the wording as a covenant instead of a plat restriction. The hearing examiner's report includes the pertinent language. On page 3, paragraph 7, the testimony of Elizabeth Higgins states the entirety of what Mr. Cook's erroneous title report offered, namely (paraphrased here) that "...no lot... in this plat shall be divided... whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on the -plat." And the next paragraph on page 3 then provides the correct wording taken directly From the face of the original plat. Namely, (paraphrased), "...no lot... in this plat shall be divided... whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located." 846 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 425 455 9280 www.connerhames.cnm The plat restriction, being all that applies, is a standard note widely used in King County in that time period. The restriction simply means that there can be no lot line adjustments or further subdivisions of lots that create ANY parcels smaller than the CURRENT zoning code allows, not the original zoning. This is appreciably different than the non-existent language created by Mr. Cook's title company. As established, the zoning in effect of the time of our application and vesting was R-8, making us consistent with that plat restriction. It is actually a redundant stipulation, in that that premise is anywhere that there is zoning jurisdiction. Be that as it may, it is still there and that is all that it means. Staff took it upon themselves to further investigate the circumstances behind this particular plat note for this particular property and found nothing unique in the County's preliminary plat file for Puget Colony. Ms. Higgins' testimony at the Hearing so stated that as well. The examiner mentioned that it is not the City's business to enforce private covenants. That is not the nature of the subject plat restriction. It is not private, but as we have outlined above it is not that the restriction should not apply in this case, it is that it is not a private covenant. It is a plat restriction, a condition for the consummation of the underlying subdivision, and we are in compliance. We broached this subject with Staff prior to making our application and were told the restriction was not prohibiting us from subdivision, given the current zoning. Unfortunately we do not have that communication exchange in writing. The second issue that Mr. Cook raises is easily addressed by a review of the land use file record. It shows that there was a complete application filed in a timely manner so as to vest the application to the R-8 zoning in effect for the property for a period following annexation. Mr. Cook believes that the filing should have included additional studies and materials, but the application did indeed comply with City requirements for completeness. Staff and the Hearing Examiner both also acknowledged and stated that fact. Thank you for your attention. We look forward to the City's decisions on the appeals. Respectfully Submitted, 4NN R. Skochdopole, P.E. ER HOMES COMPANY Project Manager APPLICANT +"*"R + Kathy Keolker, Mayor February 5, 2007 John Skochdopole Conner Homes 846 108th Avenue NE ste: #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 CIIF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator RE: City of Renton's Property Services Comments Puget Colony Short Plat Il Dear Mr. Skochdopole: Please find enclosed comments from the City's Property Services Department. These comments will guide you in the preparation of the short plat when you get to the recording stage. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7382. Sincerely, , /,g �t:: /10. ot, 6 - 6� -1-14r� Elizabeth Higgins Senior Planner cc: Cory & Cindy Brandt, Robert & Cheryl Vangeystel / Owners Dave Jordan, Shannon & Doug Luedtke, Brian Westerbeck, Karen & F-Jay Cook / Parties of Record Enclosure 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 Mn—---------- :__—, o.,w .,.,.»................ RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE February 7, 2007 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING BONNIE I. WALTON, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 7th day of February, 2007, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal filed by Frank Jay Cook of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application. (File No. LUA-06-146, SHP) Bonnie L Walton, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 7th day of February, 2007. . P-7 jan Seth Public in a for the State of. Washington, residing in Renton 'y Al Dembowski Brian Westerbeck 4906 NE I" Street P.O. Box 1767 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98057 Prank Cook and Karen Cook John Skochdopole, P.E. 4910 NE I" Court Conner Homes Renton, WA 98059 846-108 Ave NE #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Robert and Cheryl VanGeystel Lola Archer 25507-75`' Ave SW 4904 NE 1" Court Vashon, WA 98070 Renton, WA 98059 Dave Jordan Shannon and Doug 1_uedtke 4902 2"d SE 4914 NE I" Court Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-198`h Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 CITY Kathy Keolker, Mayor February 7, 2007 APPEAL FILED BY: Frank Jay Cook " RENTON City Clerk Bonnie I. Walton RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner`s decision dated 1/18/2007 regarding the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application, located at the 4900 block of SE 2n Place. (File No. LUA- 06-146, SHP) To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the Puget Colony Homes Short Plat application has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-5-110F, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters limited to support of their positions within ten (10) days of the date of mailing of the notification of the filing of the appeal. The deadline for submission of additional letters is 5:00 pm, February 19, 2007. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. The Council Liaison will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to attend the meeting, please call the Council Liaison at 425-430-6501 for information. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the -full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached are a copy of the appeal and a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call me at 425-430-6502. Sincerely, Bonnie 1. Walton City Clerk Attachments cc: Council Liaison 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425) 430-65101 FAX (425) 430-6516 This paper contahs 5-6%,ecycled material, 3a%post crosumer ENT4N AHEAD OF THE CURVE -. - v 11 N I WIN JAN 2 6 2007 RECEIVED APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISIONIRECOMMENDATIUIv CLERK'S OFFICE TO RE, NTON CITY COUNCIL FILE No. L 11A -.a6 -14sNPR llli , Pz1a't;:�"r e'0L0jUbN*( SN*LT APPLICATION NAME The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recomrnerQN(F pN Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated ° 20 JAN 2 6 2007 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: T Name: n2 ft .5 r%l Co d r Address: 4!J !b lV .0 14 r !;�_7 RECEIVED REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY): Clnr CLERICS OFFICE Name: Address: 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (PIease designate number as denoted in the Examiner's Report) No. Error: Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction: OTHER: No. Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: Modify the decision or recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other l! Z,G 2_o 0 AppellanttRepresekfativ4 Signature DMe NOTE: Please refer to Trtle M Chapter S. of the Renton Municipal Code, and Section 4-8-11 OF, for specific appeal procedures. rJ' �,� H:1CrrY CE,ERICIAPPLALIAPPEAL to Co cil.doc P l i ��4J5, l De V, sef v r C 2 S L/l'r t Y� ]�c�tJ�c3d i f Xdt� a ✓lam J City_ of Renton Municipal Code _Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110 — Appeals 4-8-110C4 , , i , �• The notice of apje slWl-be*accompanied by a fee'in accordancewith kMd4-1-170, the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-I3-82) 4-8-11 OF: Appeals to City Council — Procedures 1. Tiiitte for Appeal: Unless a specific section or State law providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court or any other body, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Council, upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. ti 2. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five (5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of thoappp4 , , 3. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may ,submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailirig of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 4. -'Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-1982) 5. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cQFt of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the applicant. In the absence of an entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25-1993) 6. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiners report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 7. Findings and Conclusions Required: If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to RMC 4-1-050171, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceeding to Exanuner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly, 8. Council Action: If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 9. Decision Documentation: In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord 3658, 9-13-1982) 10. Council Action Final:.Th4 action of the Council approving, modifying or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless appealed within the time frames established under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) r" r ra�mAomjL .. 7A ooni-ci la pzp4t cwa--t&7 pyvE fa RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE LbA-aG-1*f7'504-A L4" ft,6r=. -)4(o 0, $ 4 CI•EY OF RENTON JAN 2 $ 2007 j I � I f � � � � I f r 4 DUPLICATE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE City of Renton City Treasurer Reg# #/Rcpt#: 001-00060711 [ We ) Accounting Date: Fri, Jan 26, 2007 Date/Time: Fri, Jan 26, 2007 12:55 PM 8000/APPEAL FEE LUA-06-146 REF#: FEE AMOUNT: $75.00 ---------------------- Receipt Total - $75.00 Payment Data: Pmt# :1 Payer: F J COOK Method: CC Amount - $75.00 Receipt Summary Total Tendered - $75.00 Receipt Total = $75.00 ------------------ yChaynge Dyyueyyyy=y a yy y yy $y0.yy00 THANK YOU!! DUPLICATE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE DUPLICATE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) County of King ) ss. Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 181h day of January 2007, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: ' y� SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 101 day of , 2007. Application, Petition or Case No.: Notky Public in and fo- the State of Washington Re idine at �vr .,., , therein. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat LUA 06-146, SHPL-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Jody L. Barton, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER King County Journal REN70N, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general boor of Renton City Hall, 1055 south circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date Grady Way. Renton, Washington, on of publication hereinafter referred to published in the English language p p gconsider January 9, 2l o7 g 9:00 AM to the following petitions: continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King Pu et Colon Short Plat 2 County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Lion: 4900 ock of SE 2nd Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. Place- Description: The appli- The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the cant for this land use action has Kin- Count Journal and not in Supplement form which was regularly � Y { PP � b Y requested sulxiitotali of three vacant harcels, totaling 34,374 distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed Fquare feet, into fiva lots that notice, a would be suitable for deavelop- nient for single family residen- tial a e. The C:omprehensivc flan land use designation is Public Notice Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units was published on December 29, 2006. per net acre du/a. The proposed density would be 6.34 du/a. The The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum requested action has been tenta- tively scheduled to be considered of $103.18. by the City of Renton Hearing Examiner at a public hearing on January 9, 2007. All interested persons are invited to be present at the J dy -Barton Public s their opinions.Questionato Rphouldbe L gal Advertising Representative, king County Journal directed to the Hearing Exami- Subscribed and sworn to me this 3`d day of January, 2007. ner at 425-430-6515. Published in the King County Journal December 29. 4862565 B-6 Cantelon Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in K�nt,'Washington PO Number: "„ 84faj 05, City Clerk's Mice Distribution List Appeal, Linn Office Conversion Landscape Variance LUA-06-146, SBP February 7, 2007 11 Renton Reporter 1 Cit Attorney Larry Warren 1 City Council * Julia Medze 'an 1 EDNSP/Economic Development Alex Pietsch 1 Fire Dept/Fire Prevention I. David Daniels 7 Planning Commission Judith Subia 9. Parties of Record* * (see attached list) 1 PBPWIAdministration GreggZimmerman 4 PBPW/Development Services Neil Watts Jennifer Henning Stacy Tucker Kayren Kittrick 1 PBPW/Trans ortation Services Peter Hahn 1 PBPW/Utilities & Tech Services Lys Hornsby 1 LUA-06-146 • *Cover Letter & POR List only Appeal 1/26/2007 January 18, 2007 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT/CONTACT: I J► LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: John Skochdopole, F.E. Conner Homes 846-1080' Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038 —198' Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507--75`t' Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat LUA 06-146, SHPL-H 4900 block of SE 2"d Place Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 0.79 acre parcel into five (5) lots for the future construction of detached single-family homes. Development Services Recommendation. Approve subject to conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 3, 2007. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 9, 2007 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 9:14 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No.1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 2 Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Short Plat Map Exhibit No. 4: Preliminag Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Plan Preliminary Tree Cutting/Clearing Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit No. 7: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 8: Rezone Ma Exhibit No. 9: Aerial Photo a h Exhibit No. 10: Schedule B of Title Report Exhibit No. 11: Puget Colony 2 Plat Face Exhibit No. 12: Typed sheet with restrictions from the face of the Plat Exhibit No. 13: -County Preliminary Plat Action from King Exhibit No. 14: Letter from Seattle King County Department of Public Health Department Exhibit No. 15: Title Revort for Archer The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth -Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing a sub- division of three lots located in northeast Renton. There are two owners of the three existing lots. The lots abut on SE 2"d Place and if the application is approved, will be subdivided into five new lots. The lots were located in Residential-8 Zone at the time the application was submitted, the area has since been rezoned to Residentia14, however, the lots will comply with the R-8 zoning designation. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Single -Family. The sites have not been previously developed due to the high ground water table in the area and the fact that the septic systems would not function. The lots can now be developed due to the fact that sewers will be installed. This short plat application was not subject to review by the Environmental Review Committee. There are no known critical areas on the property. A wetland and stream analysis was submitted with the application. The site slopes down to the southeast corner of the property, drainage will flow in this direction into an existing system. The applicant has indicated that they will attempt to save trees existing along the north property line, the rest of the vegetation will be removed. The conceptual landscape plan was submitted. The plan shows street trees, they are very small and will be in the front yards of the new lots. The new five lots would be 6,600 square feet or larger which is above the minimum lots size required in this zone. The lots meet all of the zoning development standards for width, depth, lot size and potential setbacks. The subdivision also meets the comprehensive plan designation objectives and policies for subdivision of land and for the community design element policies. A net density of 6.25 dwelling units per acre for the site is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone. The new lots will be accessed via driveways off of NE 2nd Place. There are plans by the City to improve NE TO Place, there is a school in the vicinity and several parks which people access via NE 2"d Place. The applicant has agreed to pay Street Improvement costs in lieu of actually doing the improvements. This allows the City to retain some consistency with the street designs. Staff recommended Park, Fire and Transportation Fees be required as a condition of approval. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 3 There are no sanitary sewer lines to the property, there is a lift station under construction and these lots would be served by the new sanitary sewer system. There would be an East Renton Sewer Assessment District Fee imposed on each lot and sewer system development charges for both wastewater and surface water. The applicant has received a Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90. John Skochdopole, Conner Homes, 846-108"' Ave NE, Suite 202, Bellevue, WA 98004 stated that he is the project manager. That is Field Street to the west of the project and is rather fragmented. He believes the City's intent is to not improve that street. Frank Cook, 4910 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 thanked the City for the rezone of this area, it is unfortunate that the effective date allows this project to fall under the prior zone designation. He checked the filings and believes that several shortcuts have been taken that should not have been taken. Secondly, the Puget Colony homes were platted as R4 in King County in 1968, the only reason it was changed to R-8 was the growth management plan that received very little review from the citizens and residents in this area. They have asked that Renton review this process and with over a year of thorough analysis they came to the conclusion that this should be R-4. The residents believe that this area should remain consistent with the R-4 zoning designation. Lola Archer, 4904 NE I" Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated her concerns were many, first the regrading. She lives adjacent to Laurelhurst and now has a rock wall better than nine feet tall with a more than six-foot fence on top of it that abuts her backyard. She is concerned with the regarding that would be done with this new project and what the difference is between three homes and five. It seems that this project should be consistent with the rest of the community. After researching through King County files, she found that it stated that the area was not to be subdivided to smaller areas. Al Dembowski, 4906 NE 1" Street, Renton, WA 98059 questioned that in a situation where there is a covenant or statement that lots cannot be subdivided, if that has any meaning at all, does it apply in this instance? He would request a delay in the Hearing Examiner's decision in order to determine if there is any significance to that issue. When the density is changed, the character of this particular area is changed. Karen Cook, 4910 NE V Court, Renton, WA 98059 stated that as the presentation came about she noted that on Exhibit 6, which showed the trees, there is not way that those trees can be saved. When the homes are built on these small lots, they will completely fill the lots. She also thought that the square footage that is show on the report is incorrect. The total square footage from King County records shows 33,670 square feet, the City of Renton shows 34,374 square feet. Elizabeth Higgins, introduced Schedule B of a Title Report provided by Mr. Cook to the Long Range Planning Division, Item 3 of Schedule B states "restrictions contained in said plat as follows: no lot or portion of lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district stated on the plat." The second thing she received from the applicant at the time of application is the face of the plat, recording number with King County is in the lower left hand corner. The restriction states, "no lot or portion of a lot in this plat shall be divided and sold or resold or ownership changed or transferred whereby the ownership of any portion of this plat shall be less than the area required for the use district in which located." This question was put to the City Attorney who said that since it was platted in King County, one of the problems is that it doesn't say when this restriction applied or if it was the zoning at the time the Puget Colony was platted or the zoning in perpetuity, there is no indication of whether it could never be rezoned. The City Attorney's opinion was that the King County records would have to be reviewed. The preliminary plat action for Puget Colony homes was dated November 14, 1967 and states that, "it was moved and seconded that the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 4 preliminary plat be approved and that the following conditions be applied: 1. Compliance with all platting regulations of a resolution and subject to standard conditions of preliminary plat approval. 2. All lots to meet the minimum requirements of the RS-9600 lot size of plats located in the S-R areas. 3. There is to be no direct vehicular access to 140'h Avenue SE from those lots which abut it." There were only three conditions. After further searching, the Seattle King County Department of Public Health, dated November 20, 1967 there was a letter regarding the soil conditions. This stated that development of the property must be in accordance with the conditions set forth in the engineers report on file. The concern with the lots is whether they would perk or not for septic systems. All that can be inferred about the restriction on the size of the lot was the concern about the septic systems and the soil conditions. Karen Cook stated that she had the actual Policy of Title Insurance, which was dated July 9, 1973. John Skochdopole stated that they researched this issue before making application. There is no separate covenant that covers the Puget Colony lots other than that which is written on the face of that plat. That is a standard King County note and was for a very long time, it was used on all plats that served septic, at least through the 70's, 80's and early 90's. Ms. Higgins defined all the setbacks for each of the new lots. Lot 1 is a corner lot whether or not a street exists and therefore must have wider setbacks than the interior lots. Ms. Archer stated that this development should go back to R4 in order to maintain the community as it was. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that a plan was submitted under the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. They are exempt because what is coming off the site is going to be under the threshold for having to do on -site retention/detention. They will be monitoring it very closely because of the high water table and everything else that is going on in that vicinity. The final TIR will be done in the course of the final review of this site. The grading is limited due to saving the trees in that corner. They cannot do much in the way of grading, the ground if fairly fiat. There can be no more or no less water corning off the site. Erosion is watched very closely. The City has discussed building their own erosion control manual in order to catch controls that are not covered on the broad scope of King County. Regarding the septic systems, the City of Renton does not determine if a property goes from septic to sewer. Septic is allowed if sewer is not buildable and that would be under the control of the King County Health Department, not the City of Renton. The Examiner called for fui rther testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:26 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, John Skochdopole, filed a request for a Short Plat. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 5 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located in the 4900 block of SE 2nd Place. The subject site is on the north side of SE 2nd Place just east of 140th Avenue SE (King County designation) or Field Avenue. Staff reported that 140th Avenue is an unopened street and it would probably not be opened. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R-4 (Single Family - 4 dwelling units/acre). The application for this development apparently was submitted while the subject site was still zoned R-8 (Single Family - 8 dwelling units/acre) and therefore, the applicant is entitled to develop the subject site under R-8 zoning - a legal entitlement called "vesting." (See below regarding Covenants) 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5171 enacted in December 2005. 9. The subject site is approximately 34,374 square feet or 0.79 acres. The parcel is approximately 245 feet wide (east to west) by approximately 130 feet deep. The subject site consists of three (3) underlying lots that are approximately 11,960 square feet, 12,090 square feet and 9,620 square feet. 10. The subject site does not contain significant slopes but does slope down toward the southeast. The applicant proposes balancing cut and fill if possible. Any fill material would be subject to analysis. 11. A tree survey showed 21 significant trees_ Staff has noted that five trees would have to be maintained. The applicant proposes retaining some trees located on the northwest portion of the subject site. 12. The applicant proposes re -dividing the existing three lots into five lots. The lots, Proposed Lots 1 to 5, would be aligned from west to east. 13. Access to the individual lots would be straightforward - directly from SE 2nd Place. The right-of-way immediately west of the plat would be Field Avenue SE but it is a fragmented roadway and not proposed for access. The applicant proposes paying a fee -in -lieu of developing frontage improvements along SE 2nd Place. This will allow the City to provide consistent improvements along that street. 14. The density for the plat would be 6.25 dwelling units per acre. This complies with the R-8 zoning that was in effect when the application was accepted. 15. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 2 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 6 M. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 50 trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 5 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 17. Stormwater detention is not required according to the analysis submitted by the applicant but this will be checked further depending on circumstances. 18. A high water table had prevented the development of the underlying lots as a suitable septic system could not be developed. The site will now be served by sewer, which allows development of the parcels. 19. The subject site is located in Water District 90. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Water Availability. The site will have to meet City fire flow standards. 20. The City has adopted mitigation fees for transportation improvements, fire services and parks and recreational needs based on an analysis of the needs and costs of those services. These fees are applied to new development to help offset the impacts new homes and residents have on the existing community and the additional demand for services. 21. There are existing covenants that govern the earlier plat and therefore, the three lots the applicant proposes re -dividing under this review. Neighbors raised objections to the current proposal. They suggested that those covenants prevent re -dividing the property into smaller lots than the original lot sizes. CONCLUSIONS: This office is not in a position to judge the validity of the underlying covenants that cover the lots that comprise the subject site. The covenants were introduced by neighbors and it will be up to those neighbors to clarify with court action or negotiation how they apply to the subject site. There could be sufficient questions about their affect that they could cloud the title of the proposed lots but that is something that the applicant and future purchasers will have to weigh. The neighbors may always seek legal assistance or take legal action if they wish to pursue the issue outside of this forum. 2. The proposed plat, aside from the covenant issues, appears to serve the public use and interest. It will create additional lots in an area designated for suburban densities. While the comprehensive plan suggests lower density residential uses in this area and that is even demonstrated by the current, lower, R-4 zoning, the applicant took advantage of a window when the site was zoned R-8. They are permitted to seek development that matched the R-8 Zoning. The development will increase the demands on the City's parks, roads and emergency services. The applicant shall therefore help offset those impacts by providing mitigation that matches the fees established by the City. 4. The development will also increase the tax base of the City and that should help offset the more generalized impacts of the development on City services. The lots are all rectangular and all are larger than the minimum 5,000 square feet required for plats under one acre in older neighborhoods. Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 7 6. The applicant will have to comply with general landscaping requirements as well as tree preservation and street tree requirements. DECISION: The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 2. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required. The TESCP shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single-family structure, shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single-family residence shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. ORDERED THIS 18`h day of January 2007 .V.E.1,,1V..XTG EY 4 Aul"M TRANSMITTED THIS 18`h day of January 2007 to the parties of record: Elizabeth Higgins 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Development Services City of Renton Lola Archer 4904 NE 15` Court Renton, WA 98059 John Skochdopole, P.E. Conner Homes 846-100 Ave NE, #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Frank Cook and Karen Cook 4910 ONE I" Court Renton, WA 98059 Al Dembowski 4906 NE 1" Street Renton, WA 98059 Shannon and Doug Luedtke Brian Westerbeck 4914 NE 1'Court P Box 1767 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98057 Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038-198`h Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507-751h Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Dave Jordan 4902 2nd SE Renton, WA 98059 Puget Colony 2 Short Plat File No.: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H January 18, 2007 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 18" day of January 2007 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Larry Rude, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writine on or before 5:00p.m., February 1, 2007. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m;. February 1, 2007. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. - The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Project Location: 4900 block of SE 2r° Place I +•Ml�iail6[iwv 111r1tirKY�uN Ct �44 ------------- a�w I IQp� 1 pp10gL R H y w�l . lip lilts R � 8 3-N '3AY nvhloOW _uvlcl xlsxi,00w _ 1 i 1 1 r .f1C awo� iF MIX r---Y--------------------- --- � r 1 r I 1 i i i 1 1 = 1 1 1 1 1 1 r � � 1 I r r N L_________________________ i a «t s tj r------------�--�"----'--1 i ..- rh 1 j fA r I 1� � 1 i 1 a 1 i IL- - - - - - - - - - - - ------------ r �r f -------------------- , � 1 ------------------------ i i r , r 1 r 1 1 1 1 f 3 ----'--_------- -. -_- — - ! ! City _ . .enton Department of Planning / Building / PL.,o_ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rp 9 �r_ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA46-146, SHPL-H DATE CIRCULATED: D CEM APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: E eth I li ins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 34,374 s uafe feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2ntl Place l WORK ORDER NO: 77680 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of three vacant parcels, totaling 34,374 square feet, into five parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre du/a. The proposed density would be 6.34 du/a. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impact. More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Sharehne Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation UNIties Transportation Public Services HistorlclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with parF+gular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infgtmation is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director c5-r Representative .-�- l -- n') Date CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 19, 2007 TO: Elizabeth Higgins FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat 1I, LUA-06-146-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant: The indexing information (top center of drawing sheet) is incorrect. Revise and correct as needed. The short plat submittal and the Land Use Permit Master Application document both note Cheryl Vangeystel as an owner of the subject short plat properties. However, The Chicago Title Insurance Company Short Plat Certificate, Order No. 1225600, dated November 14, 2006, only notes Robert Vangeystel as the property owner for two of the three subject parcels. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-06-146-SHPL and LND-20-0474, respectively, on the drawing, preferably in the upper right-hand corner. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network (note the city's monument numbers). The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties have been provided. Note the dates the existing monuments were visited, per WAC 332-130-150, and what was found. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. \HAFile Sy&END - Land Subdivision & Surveying Recordc1LND-20 - Short P1ats104741RV470125.doc January 31, 2007 Page 2 Note the bearings for all the interior boundary lines of the proposed lots. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC 332-130-1 Da. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Note all casements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing, if any. Note the plat name (dashed or other) of the properties to the east, and north of the subject parcels. The city will provide addresses for the proposed lots as soon as possible. Note said addresses on the short plat drawing. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to utilities facilities, topog lines and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. Remove the building setback lines noted on the short plat lots and in the "SITE STATISTICS" block. Setbacks will be determined at the time that building permits are issued. Remove all references to zoning and density from the final short plat submittal. Remove the "OWNER", "APPLICANT" and "PLANNER/ENGINEER/SURVEYOR" blocks from the final submittal. The City of Renton Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works is the only city official who signs this short plat. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line. Pertinent King County approval blocks also need to be noted on the drawing. All vested owner(s) of the subject short plat need to sign the final short plat drawing. Include notary blocks as needed_ Include a declaration block on the drawing. Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The short plat will be recorded first (by King County). The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) are to be referenced on the short plat drawing. Provide spaces for the recording numbers thereof. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. HAFile Sys1LND - Land Subdivision & Surveying Rccord-,lLND-20 - Short P1a1s104741RV070125.docicor t +f PROPERTY VICES FEE REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISI{ No. 2006 - 65 JOB ADDRESS: '451exi 'BLI- . or! SIZE' 21...1ta, -P NATURE OF WORK: �C PREL] IINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIOSfON Bt LONG PLAT, SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, TIILS REVIEW REPLACES PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED (date) E) WO// LND # 20 - 0474 ED MOkE ORMATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PID #'s VICINITY MAP SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER FRONT FOOTAGE SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT YID# Gs4e-C)GF_QI " NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when -O{��1 assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/awner on notice, that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on -site and off -site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based an current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The existing house on SP Lot # , addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existence of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS DISTRICT NO. PARCEL NO. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT UNITS ASSESSMENT OR FEE Latecomer Agreement vt) WATER Latecomer Agreement vt) WASTEWATER Latecomer Aereement (vt) OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER FA-- 1� WTC" ! p, Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER I k I 5 ! Joint Use Agreement TRO) Local Im rovement District Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER Estimated - Pd Prev. PartiallyPd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd # OF UNITS/ 5Q. FIG. SDC FEE Sin fanril residential $1 956/unit x -- q Mobile home dwelling unit $1 9S6/unit in arictov117 A ent Condo $1,174/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.273/sq. ft. of property (not less than $1,956.00) x Boeing, by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WASTEWATER- Estimated " Pd Prev. _ PartiallyPd (Ltd Exemption) - Never Pd S' le farm[ residential $1,0171unit x Mobile home dwellingunit $1,017/unit x A ent, Condo $610/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial $0.142/s . ft. of ro x(not less than $1,017.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SURFACEWATER - Estimated Pd Prev. " Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) " Never Pd Single famil residential and mobile home dwelling unit $759/unit x All other properties $0.265/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than $759.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ I O.A-4. FxR m N VAT t { �cSignature evict ng Authority 65 rt i *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paidlun-paid status. r• Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change, Current City SDC fee charges apply to 0 EFFECTIVE January 8, 2006 Cit .,Renton Department of Planning/Building/ tic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ra r S:- c Fs COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-146, SHPL-H DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson - SITE AREA: 34,374 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2"d Place WORK ORDER NO: 77680 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of three vacant parcels, totaling 34,374 square feet, into five parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre dula. The proposed density would be 6.34 du/a. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics L' ht/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 00o Feet id, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 41h day of January, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to. - Name Representing John Skochdopole Applicant/Contact Cory & Cindy Brandt Owner Robert & Cheryl Vangeystel Owner Dave Jordan POR Shannon & Doug Luedtke POR Brian Westerbeck POR Karen & F-Jay Cook POR (Signature of Sender)_ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) L/ SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker ' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/he !their free and voluntary purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,I Dated: , Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington 3 / I q /'/0 Project Name: Puget Colony 2 Short Plat Project Number: LUA06-146, SHPL-H CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING January 9, 2007 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Puget Colony 2 Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER; LUA06-146, SHPL-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of the subdivision of 3 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 3 parcels total 34,374 sf and would be subdivided into 5 lots suitable for single-family development. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zone (R-4), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8). HEX Agenda 1-M7 City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning / Building / Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: January 9, 2007 Project Name: Puget Colony 2 Short Plat Owners: Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 3038 — 198th Ave SE 25507 — 751h Ave SW Sammamish, WA 98075 Vashon, WA 98070 Applicant/Contact., John Skochdopole, R.E. Conner Homes 846 — 1081h Ave NE #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 File Number: LUA-06-146, SHPL-H Project Manager: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of the subdivision of 3 parcels of land located in the Puget Colony neighborhood of Renton. This area was annexed into Renton in 2005. The 3 parcels total 34,374 sf and would be subdivided into 5 lots suitable for single-family development. The site is located within the Residential 4 Zone (R4), but the land use master application for this subdivision was deemed compete prior to the application of this zoning. The subdivision application is vested to the previous zoning, which is Residential 8 (R-8). Continued nexteage_ _ - Project Location: 4900 block of SE 2"d Place City of Renton PA31PW Deparb Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PLA i z LUA06-146, SHPL-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 2 of 10 B. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map Exhibit 3: Preliminary Short Plat Map (dated November 2006) Exhibit 4: Preliminary Grading & Utility Plan (dated November 2006) Exhibit 5: Preliminary Tree Cutting/Clearing Plan (dated November 2006) Exhibit 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan (dated November 2006) Exhibit 7: Zoning Map (dated February 16, 2006) Exhibit 8: Rezone Map (dated November 17, 2006) C. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owners of Record. 2. Zoning Designation: Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt 3038 —198`h Ave SE Sammamish, WA 98075 Robert and Cheryl Van Geystel 25507 — 751h Ave SW Vashon, WA 98070 Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) [vested to this zoning December 5, 2006] 3.Comprehensive Plan Residential Single -Family (RSF) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: The site is currently undeveloped. 5_ Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Partially developed as single family residential; zoned R-4 East. Developed as single family residential; zoned R4 South: Large -lot single family residential development; unincorporated King County West: Single family residential; zoned R-8 6. Access_ SE 2"d Place 7. Site Area: 34,374 sf (0.79 acre) 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: NIA NIA New Building Area: N/A NIA Total Building Area: N/A NIA D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation NIA 5171 12/05/2005 Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/01/2004 Zoning N/A 5171 12/05/2005 Puget Colony 2 HEKRPT City of Renton PB/PW Depar Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PLA7 2 LUA06-146, SHPL-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 3 of 10 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations Section 4-7-050: General Outline of Subdivision, Short Plat and Lot Line Adjustment Procedures Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-150: Streets - General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks - General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots - General Requirements and Minimum Standards 6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 7. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Residential Single Family, objectives and policies. Community Design Element: New Development G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The proposal is to subdivide 3 previously formed, but undeveloped lots in the Puget Colony plat into 5 lots. Puget Colony was subdivided in 1968 while under the jurisdiction of King County. The land has remained vacant due to several factors including, but not limited to, lack of wastewater service, high groundwater table, inability of the soils to accommodate septic sewer systems, and zoning. The proposed lots are intended for the future construction of single family residences. In 2005, the property was annexed into the City of Renton with Residential 8 (R-8) zoning, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). In 2006, the City of Renton initiated a rezone to Residential 4 zoning. Prior to final adoption of this rezone, the applicants submitted a land use master application for this subdivision. The application was deemed complete prior to the R4 zoning becoming effective. Therefore, the current review of the short plat application utilizes the development standards for the R-8 Zone. During the comment period, following posting notice of the proposed subdivision, staff received 5 comments from neighbors of the potential subdivision. Two comments were in favor of the proposed subdivision and three were opposed to the subdivision. Puget Colony 2 HEXRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Depart Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PLA r LUA06-146, SHPL-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 4 of 10 There are no known critical areas on the property. A Wetland and Stream Analysis was submitted with the application. This report was completed by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. based on field work done in October and November 2006, including the week following record rainfalls in the area. The methodology used is as described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification Manual (March 1997), which is recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations_ The Wetland and Stream Analysis indicates that no wetland hydrology was observed on any of the parcels. The topography of the site slopes down to the southeast, but does not have significant slopes. The land is vegetated primarily with fir trees up to 24 inches in diameter and 30 to 40 year old cottonwood trees. The applicant intends to preserve 25 percent of the significant trees on the property. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted indicating that required landscaping would be provided for each lot_ The 3 lots to be subdivided front on SE 2"d Place and (from west to east) consist of 11,960 sf, 12,090 sf, and 9,620 sf each (approximately). The subdivision of these 3 lots would result in 5 lots of (from west to east) the following acreages: Lot Size (sf) Lot 1 7,874 Lot 2 6,625 Lot 3 6,625 Lot 4 6,625 Lot 5 6,625 Total 34,374 There are no private streets or easements proposed. Each lot would be accessed directly from SE 2"d Place by private driveways. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAG 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES N/A 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SHORT PLAT CRITERIA: Approval of a short plat is based upon several factors. The following criteria have been established to assist decision makers in the review of the subdivision: Puget Colony 2 HEXRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Depart Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PLA r 2 WA06-146, SHPL-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 5 of io (a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation. The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The objective established by the RSF designation is to protect and enhance single-family neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with the RSF designation in that it would provide for the future construction of single-family homes. The proposed plat is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies for Residential Single Family Land Use and Community Design Elements: Land Use Element Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods_ The proposed project for 5 lots would arrive at a net density of 6.25 dwelling units per net acre, which is within the density range required. Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 sf should be allowed on infill parcels of less than one acre (43,560 sq. R.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to 4,500 sf on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range. All of the proposed lots exceed the minimum lot size of 5,000 sf and all are larger than 6,600 sf. In addition, land would be aggregated to form the basis of the subdivision_ Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and sufcient area for maintenance activities. The proposed new lots would exceed the required lot size, width, depth, and setbacks to create sufficient front, rear, and side yard areas_ Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project designs incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and quality of life for existing residents. The proposed lots are rectangular in shape and oriented such that all of the lots would have access to a public right-of-way. Approval of this application would not decrease the quality of life for residents in the immediate vicinity. Community Design Element Policy CD-12. infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods. The proposed short plat would subdivide 3 existing parcels into 5 lots. Five new residences would be constructed on the new lots, updating the housing stock in the existing neighborhood. Policy CD-16. During land division, all lots should front on streets or parks. Discourage single - tier lots with rear yards backing onto a street. All lots would front on SE 2nd Place, a public street. The subdivision would be single -tier with lots backing to rear yards. Policy CD-19. During development, significant trees, either individually or in stands, should be preserved, replaced, or as a last option, relocated. Trees will be preserved in rear lots where possible. Twenty -rive percent of significant trees would be retained. Objective CD-K: Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions, should include landscape plans. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the short plat application. The applicant is proposing to provide the required street trees and landscaping along SE 2"d Place. Puget Colony 2 HEXRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Depart Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 LUA06-146, SHPL-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 6 of 10 Policy CD- 50. Trees should be planted along residential streets, in parking lots requiring landscaping, and in other pervious areas as the opportunity arises. Trees should be retained whenever possible and maintained using Best Management Practices as appropriate for each type. The Residential 8 zone lots are required to have a minimum of two trees per lot in the front yard setback or within the abutting public right -of way of each lot. Trees at the ratio of 2 per lot have been proposed for new lots. In addition, all pervious areas of single-family lots are to be landscaped. Protected trees will either be retained or replaced. Maintenance would be the responsibility of the property owner. Objective CD-K: Site plans for new development projects for all uses, including residential subdivisions, should include landscape plans. A landscape plan for the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat has been submitted by the applicant. Completion of the landscaping prior to occupation would be required. (b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation. The 0.79 acre site is vested to the previous zoning, Residential — 8 dwelling units per net acre. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of up to 5 new dwelling units and associated plat improvements. Density: The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre. Net density is calculated after the deduction of sensitive areas, areas intended for public rights -of -way, and private access easements. There would be no deductions necessary for this plat. The proposed plat would have a net density of 6.25 dwelling units per net acre (34,374 sf = 0.79 acre; 5 lots / 0.79 acres = 6.34 dula), which is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone. Lot Dimensions: The minimum lot size permitted in the R-8 zone is 5,000 sf for parcels less than 1 acre in area. A minimum lot width of 50 feet is required for interior lots. Lot depth is required to be a minimum of 65 feet. All proposed lots would exceed the minimum lot dimension requirements and the proposed lots would be adequate for the construction of single family residences. Setbacks: The required setbacks for the R-8 zone are 15 feet in front for the primary structure and 20 feet for the attached garage, 5 feet along interior side yards, 15 feet for the primary structure for side yards along streets (including access easements) and 20 feet for the attached garage for side yards along streets (including access easements), and 20 feet for rear yards. The setbacks will be verified at the time of building permit review, however each of the proposed lots appears to provide adequate area to comply with the required setbacks. Building Standards: The R-8 zone permits one single-family residential structure per lot. Each of the proposed lots would support the construction of one detached unit_ Accessory structures are permitted at a maximum number of two per lot at 720 sf each, or one per lot at 1,000 sf in size_ Building height in the R-8 zone is limited to 2 stories and 30 feet for primary structures and 15 feet for detached accessory structures. Maximum building coverage is limited to 35% of the lot area or 2,500 sf, whichever is greater, for lots over 5,000 sf in size. The proposal's compliance with each of these building standards will be verified prior to the issuance of building permits for each individual structure. Parkins: Each detached dwelling unit is required to provide two off-street parking stalls per unit. The proposed building pads appear to be adequately sized for the provision of the required parking. However, verification of two off-street parking stalls will be necessary at the time of building permit review. Puget Colony 2 HEXRPT City of Renton PIRVW Depart Preliminary Report to the Nearing ,Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PL4 T 2 L UA06-146, SHPL-H PUBLIC HF_IRING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 7 of 10 (c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Lot Arrangement: Side lot lines are to be at right angles to street lines, and each lot must have access to a public street or road. Access may be by private access easement per the requirements of the Street Improvement Ordinance. The side lot lines of the proposed lots are at right angles to SE 2nd Place. All lots would gain access directly from SE 2"d Place, a public roadway. As proposed, lots comply with arrangement and access requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Lots: The size, shape and orientation of lots shall meet the minimum area and width requirements of the applicable zoning classification and shall be appropriate for the type of development and use contemplated. Each of the proposed lots satisfies the minimum lot area, width, and depth requirements of the R- 8 zone. When considering the required setbacks, as well as access points for each lot, the proposed lots appear to have sufficient building area for the development of suitable detached single-family homes. All of the proposed lots are rectangular in shape. All of the lots are oriented to provide their front yards facing to the south towards SE 2n4 Place. Property Corners at Intersections: All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights -of -way, except alleys, shall have minimum radius of 15 feet. There are no property corners to be dedicated for right-of-way purposed as part of this plat. (d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access and Street Im rovements: Access would be provided to the proposed lots via residential driveways onto SE 2 Place. SE 2nd Place is a paved public street, but there are no other street improvements at this location. Therefore, the awlicant must either install a curb, gutter, streetlights, and sidewalks along the frontage of SE 2 Place or pay a fee in lieu of such installation. The applicant indicated in the project application that they will pay the in -lieu fee. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. Each new lot is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $1,435.50 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 5 lots = $3,588.75) and is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Topo rc� aphDevelopment of the site is expected to generate equal amounts of cut and fill. If balanced cut and fill is not possible, a source statement would be provided if imported fill is required. The City's Critical Areas maps do not indicate the presence of protected slopes or other critical areas on site. There may, however, be runoff from stormwater during site construction that could impact public streets or nearby properties. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the short plat be conditioned to include implementation of a Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP) and the use of Best Management Practices to mitigate potential erosion and off -site sedimentation impacts. The Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume 11 of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Puget Colony 2 HEXRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Depart Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 LUA06-146 SHPL-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 8 of 10 Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. Construction Miti_, acl Lion: A Construction Mitigation Plan is required and would be subject to final approval prior to the issuance of construction permits for the project. L.andscaoina: RMC 4-4-070 indicates that existing trees and other vegetation shall be used to augment new plantings for landscaping where practical, and RMC 4-7-130 requires that a reasonable effort should be made to preserve existing trees. A Determination was made by the Director of Development Services that the retention or replacement of 25 percent of the existing significant trees would achieve these requirements. Of the existing 21 significant trees, the applicant has proposed and would be required to retain 5 trees. Relationship to Exisf_ina Uses: The subject site is currently undeveloped. The surrounding area includes single-family residences developed under both the R-4 and the R-8 zoning designations. The proposed lots are compatible with other existing and newly created lots in this area of the City. The proposal is consistent with the intent of both the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code and would not be out of character with the existing or recent development in the area. Community Assets: The City's landscape regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public right-of-way. The minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non -arterial public street (SE 2"d Place) is 5 feet, provided that if there is additional undeveloped right-of-way in excess of 5 feet, this shall also be landscaped. A determination has been made that if no additional area is available within the public right-of-way due to required improvements, the 5-foot landscaped strip may be located within private property abutting the public right-of-way. The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-112 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), within the front yard or planting strip of each proposed lot. A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. Two trees are proposed for each lot. The proposed trees would be either Acer Rubrum (red maple), Fraxinus Pennsylvanica (green ash), or Tilia Cordata (littleleaf linden). A detailed landscape plan is required to be submitted with the building permit application and the trees are required to be installed prior to building occupancy. All new electrical, telephone, and cable service must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to the recording of the Final Plat. (a) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicates that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code required improvements, and mitigation fees. These fees would help offset any additional impacts to emergency services generated from this development. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single family structure, is recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $2,440.00 ($488 x 5 = $2,440.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. A 5-inch quick -disconnect fitting will be required to be installed on all new hydrants (see "Water Utility", below). Any existing hydrant counted as fire protection will require installation of a "Storz" quick disconnect fitting if not already in place. Street addresses must be visible from a public street. Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per single family residential dwelling. Therefore, it is anticipated that the proposed short plat would result in 2 (0.44 X 5 = 2.2) new children to the local schools. The Renton School District Puget Colony 2 HExRPT City of Renton PJB/PW Depart, Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 LUA06-146, SHPL-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 9 of 10 has indicated they can accommodate the additional students generated by this proposal at Maplewood Heights Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School. Parks: It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single family residence to address these potential impacts. Therefore, a fee estimated at $2,653.80 ($530.76 X 5 = $2,653.80) would be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Storm Water: The project site is within the Maplewood Creek Drainage Basin. A Preliminary Drainage Analysis prepared by Dodds Engineering, Inc. dated November 2006, was submitted with the project application. Also submitted was the Level 1 -Downstream Analysis for the Shy Creek project (an associated subdivision by the same applicant)_ According to these reports, the property drains as sheet flow in a southeasterly direction to a concentration point at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Hoquiam Ave SE and SE 2"d Place. Drainage captured by an existing catch basin is conveyed to the east in a 12 inch concrete pipe across Hoquiam Avenue SE to an outfall located at the northeast corner of the intersection. Drainage is then captured by an adjacent 28 inch CMP intake that conveys the drainage south across SE 2"d Place. The outfali for the 48 inch CMP discharges to Maplewood Creek. The Downstream Analysis indicates that Maplewood Creek meanders south and west until it reaches the Cedar River, approximately 1 mile away. The narrative has been reviewed by the City of Renton's Plan Review Section. Based on the analysis, this project is exempt from detention and water quality as per the adopted 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. A Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC) would be required, however. SDC are based on a rate of $759.00 per new single-family lot. Payment of this fee would be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit. Water Utility: The proposed project is located within the King County Water District #90 service area_ A Certificate of Water Availability was submitted with the application. The Water District Certificate must verify that minimum fire flow requirements can be met. The Water District would require extension of the water main, granting of necessary easements, replacement of water main on SE 2rnd Place, installation of fire hydrants, and potentially the relocation of an AC main on SE 1401h Place. Fire flow requirement for single-family residences is 1,000 gpm from a hydrant located within 300 feet of the furthest structure. If residences exceed 3,600 sf in area (including garage area), fire flow increases to 1,500 gpm and an additional hydrant would be required. All short plats shall provide a separate water service stub to each building lot prior to recording of the plat. Sanitary Sewer Utility: There are currently no sanitary sewer mains adjacent to the site. There is a lift station under construction approximately 200 feet east of the property however. A sewer main must be extended to the farthest point of the plat. Each new lot would require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the Final Plat. An East Renton Sewer Assessment District fee in the amount of $316.80 per unit would be due at the time a construction permit is issued. The City of Renton Sewer System Development Charge of $1,017 per new single-family residence would be due at the time a construction permit is issued. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Puget Colony 2 Short Plat, Project File No. LUA-06-146, SHPL-H subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. The fee is payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Puget Colony 2 HEXRPT City of Renton P/B/PW Depart Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 LUA06-146, SHPL-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE JANUARY 9, 2007 Page 10 of 10 2. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required. The TESCP shall be designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of the most recent Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual. This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $488.00 per new single family structure, shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4. A Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single family residence shall be payable prior to the recording of the Final Plat. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Short; Plats (SHPL): If the short plat is not filed within two years from date of approval (RMC 4-7- 070.M), the short plat shall become null and void. Puget Colony 2 HEXRPT PAN p� O 4NIIfA7R7 pNIkN 1/� >7 NlliiXIDM7 /�pN 7pl,yj; b �� M9fS7Q �x+a 77';rrglr fin' 9e7 3d.>o... s Nr 7w>fw7s.r �aewrre - - -NAW ,r q l�leK9r a;.n.ee. — •••� •`�,"•••• � dlb'Id11 IfS.f 713.W,bm&w """"° • - p1.ArYlYlF ��nl z � 2 x Ill — 3'N •3AV WVIfIbDH - — m-�`� � _9691C1 3.iS.91.00N i I I I I I 1 a ' ' I I 1 P700 SILRP?FI.- + I � I a Q g � I I • I � I ! 1 y r--_________�__ I I 11 ¢ O 1 • I I A L �2.i ``= a cv I` L---------- -------- ----� ° ��� r-------- - i ova I 1 I z ! I I 1 . I l L----------- ---------_ 1 I w I I xtlE¢ a r - - - - - - - - - - - a� o- - - - - - - - - - u 1 1 -S a _ 3p I I I F:6 Q _ w 1 I w � 4+fib I ---- Up,p, IM I' 1 I VG 031 ^ �l -3-S '3AV HIM I.PIT L ,s.,:s.noN ....... A! ONIHkYt/ � ONIi 7t NlOat1 �rwvsw rersre. w` a MUD 1 'M i � AMff AUOWGw jlt AWJff -x3W t'f W M JliV� �h�sm b � ^+ -`tee slNfasmr R>•aV Ai/ll��f �YINVIfiV/W �i��44 I� � yry •If T------------------------------------- I 1 I �I I I � I � 1 1 I I a I I i f f I i I I I ! I I I 1 I I 4 I ^dry 1 I I I F 1 I I 1 I I r 1f I � I I r 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 _ I I I a I I * I 1 I � - ! I I I I I 1 I �n la4NIIM I r� ]]y$ I II �ad� I I I 1 I I.. ! f I = f 1 I I w l I i f t 1 ■ 1 i . I I 1 I 1 I I r I i 11 1 I 1 � I I 1 1 I I I I YY I � ■ � T I 1 All ----------------L- ----- - - Ij I �~ I la Iq I 1 — — 35 3iY M►OF4 e...Y �.o-.asw 1 R �y �R S �_� � g srurr+nt exrr+M rr+ max+ ewr ' � ar wow rw .tea sue; law Aw ►til AX AM 3v" -q3m /Yr°1fel-%MM oww I Xr wGr � FHA � b a�,r'•• xfer;Qrlu' $ -- m ovowa. � R'r:Tr1W Ab1NVIrLW ov r+nn auc A of. i1: im 4 E6 - 10 TZ3N R5E E 1/2 1io �A7NEh ioFR-8 �4' R_ Rr4 R-4 S. 0 SE 2nd Pl I SE 139th P: .. cf) UN 5 � � L SE 142nd St /A\ �, ( F �+ 44� \L\�L l�J� IE G6 - 22 T23N RSE E 1/2 ZONING — — — — Rl+m city umw►. r/evrw TOCEWWAL emits end SE SE E 14�th Pl. EXHIB 7 15 T23N R5E E 1/2� IT zf/I�` wn� &r- 14--7 December 19, 2006 To: The Mayor of Renton Cc: Senior Planner From: Richard Galusha 19689 7 h Ave. N-E. #308 Poulsbo, WA 98370 Subject: Disappointment Folks, I have been trying and working to get sewers on our property on 2nd Ave. (Puget Colony Homes) for over twenty years (20). It is finally going to happen after going to countless meetings and talking with your folks on the phones and numerous emails over that period of time.. (Because we live out of the area going to all the meetings was tough but we made most all of them). When we went into the City the area was zoned R8. Somehow this got changed back to R4, (we could not make that meeting). However, I was very surprised to learn that Connor Homes got some short -plats in and he will get the R8 zoning because there was a period of time that allowed this before it became R4. My disappointment is that as long as I have communicated with the City ,and several of your folks where aware that we wanted very much to short -plat our property. We where never informed there was a period of time between the R8 and R4 zoning where a person could put in the short -plat. The only notification we received was that the zoning had been changed. This has really hurt us, is there any chance of getting a variance? We will have Connor Home short -plats beside us and behind us. Prior to us not being informed of this period between the R8 and R4 zoning we have had an excellent relationship with the City and look forward to continue that relationship. 360-821-9623 City t_ ..enton Department of Planning / Building / Pu, - Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: [c n }� ;«� p,, j 1: , P, ,,_ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 20Q6 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-146, SHPL-H DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins r , PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colon Short Plat 2 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 34,374 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA lit LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2nd Place WORK ORDER NO: 77680 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of three vacant parcels, totaling square feet, into five parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre du/a. The proposed density would be 6.34 du/a. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS PWE C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Majar impacts More information Necessary Housing Aesthetics L g hMare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Histo6clCuttural Preservahbn Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identifted areas of probable impact or areas whe dditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Direco or Authohized Representative Date City _ _ ..enton Department of Planning f Building / Pu_-_ _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: T (II T& COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-146, SHPL-H DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins RECEIVED PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 34,374 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2"d Place WORK ORDER NO: 77680 BUILDING DTV[SrW SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of three vacant parcels, totaling 34,374 square feet, into five parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre dula. The proposed density would be 6.34 dula_ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics L" hVGlare Recreation Utilities Transe2rtation Public Services HistoriclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this a tion with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition form do needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date f' *RN' PLANNING/BUILDING/ +VtN ♦ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 18, 2006 TO: Elizabeth Higgins FROM: Mike Dotson.//�,�.� SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat 1 and 2, LUA06-I46 and 147, SHPL-H The following Utility and Transportation comments concern the Environmental and Development Application review for the subject projects. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER- The subject site is outside the City of Renton water service area. Water District 90 supplies water service in this area. SEWER -There are no sewer mains adjacent to this site. There is a sewer lift station under construction approximately 200-feet to the east of this site. STORM -There exist drainage ditches in this area. The site is within the Maplewood Creek Drainage basin. STREET -There is currently no a paved public right-of-way adjacent to the sites. However there are no streetlights, curbs, gutters or sidewalks. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. A certificate of water availability will be required from Water District 90 prior to recording of the short plat. The certificate must verify that minimum fire flow requirements are met (hydrants within 300-feet and 1000 gpm flow). SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer System Development Charge is $1,017 per new single-family residence. This fee is due with the construction permit. 2. The sewer main must be extended to the extreme boundaries of the plat. Each new lot will require a new side sewer connection prior to recording the short plats 3. A Sewer Assessment District (East Renton) fee in the amount of $316.80/per unit is due at the time a construction permit is issued. H:1Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.inglPROJECT5106-147.Elizabethlpuget colony GF.doc Page 2 of 2 SURFACE WATER 1. Surface Water System Development Charge is $759 per new dwelling unit. 2. A drainage report was submitted and accepted. In accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water design manual, per code, the report submitted showed that these projects are below the thresholds for both water quality and detention requirements. Therefore these projects are exempt from detention and water quality. All other surface ,eater improvements including, but not limited to: conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, driveway crossings and any frontage improvements are required to meet City of Renton standards. TRANSPORTATION 1. The traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per additional single family home at a rate of 9.57 trips (8 x 9.57 trips x $75/trip = $5,742.00). This fee is required prior to recording the short plat. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the short plat. 3. Per City of Renton code these projects are required to install curb, gutter, streetlights (for Short Plat 2 only) and sidewalks, along the frontage of the parcels being developed. Note: The design plans submitted with the Land Use review did not include the required frontage improvements. These improvements are a code requirement of the short plat. Or, as an alternative, the applicant may apply to pay a "fee -in -lieu" of installation. CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and staff review. 2. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per additional Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. The total for both short plats (8 new single-family lots) is $5,742.00. Cc: Kayren Kittrick h:ldivision_sldevelop.serldev&plan, inglprojects106-147.el izabethlpuget colony gf.doc City enton Department of Planning / Building / P . Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f �.';e FIE;VPP.},n1) COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-146, SHPL-H DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 34,374 square feet —_.� . BUILDING AREA ro 5 : NIA ___ LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2ntl Place WORK ORDER NO: 7768ii(��` SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested sub square feet, into five parcels that would be suitable for development of single family r designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which proposed density would be 6.34 dula. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants ZandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources S. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS 6,a i o thr �a can arcels, totoling; 34,374 :ial. T€artCph a Pldr} land use 8i'dwelling units per ne aco-dula. The Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistoriclCutturai Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet � ilcYl dcl�md/ We have reviewed is apptica6on wit particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi a! informafion is ded to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dir of or Authorized Repres tative Date FIRE DEPARTMENT �+} M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 6, 2006 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner 10, FROM: James Gray, Assistant Fire Marsh �j I SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat, 5000 SE 142"� St SE MITIGATION ITEMS: 1. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single- family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to a minimum of 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Fire department access roads are required to be paved, 20 feet wide. 3. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i Apugetcolonysperc.doc City _. _ 'enton Department of Planning / Building / P__ _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 7ru„S o� COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-146, SHPL-H DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes ,,:I I Ml:N 1 VIv PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins Y OF PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 34,374 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2"d Place I WORK ORDER NO: 77680 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of three vacant parcels, totaling 34,374 square feet, into five parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the Current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre du/a. The proposed density would be 6.34 du/a. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shorefine Use Animals Environmental Health l=nergyl Natural Resources Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts MGM Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht(Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistorkXultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet `T PF 5 ;T 7 3# -A2 -1 1 a 1 w ldtR� B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this on with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio inform ion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Lam.. i r- or Authorized Representative Date s# 7 3 Project Name:�.- Project Address: �-v110 Contact Person: COKAI.E-V Permit Number: Project Description: 5 LOT S( 1 Spa L Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: Residential I!f—rTE Trip Generation Manual, 70 Edition ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Non -retail Other � S+F4�-� � • � .. - ' ..• "tee, ", • -Transportation .Mitlg.aflon." fl e: ' G 4culated by. �� .,..... _ Dade. 1 Date Of • _ _ �- i . S# -73� Project Name: P062[r—co UIA;J S L (3- Proj ect Address: lZ g k ooy'-1 20A i Ac� Contact Person: COKAkw 5 Permit Number: Wt� is -- M to Project Description: Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: Residential ,n—ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7t' Edition ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Non -retail ❑ Other Transportation r gation flee: Calcuiated by: - - -- T Date: 1 aI of PaInnentw- _ - -- - - To: Elizabeth Higgins - Senior Planner From: Dave JorDan Date: 12/07/06 Subject: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 / LUA06-146, SHPL-H v Are there an honest politician's left in the City of Renton? This year I received a notice that no further R-8 land use would be allowed in the `East Renton Plateau`. Initially we were told that the R-8 / R-9 designation was mandatory condition placed upon us as a result of a comprehensive regional plan for the best land use. This was not the truth. Then we were told that the plan was not mandatory, and as a result of Renton residence objections to R-8 (high density) The City of Renton was not going to bless us with anymore R-8 other than projects that were already approved, no more R-8. Puget Colony Short Plat 2/LUA06-146, SHPL-H, and Short Plat 1 / LUA06- 147, SHPL-A appears to have been approved for R-8. You folks ran the LAURELHURST development up our ass over our objections; now we are about to be blessed with five "Boston Style Row Houses" stuffed into three lots on SE Zed PI., and three more of the same on two lots located at the east end of SE Zed. St. off Hoquiam Ave NE. This is not consistent with our existing neighbor hood lot size, or building style, and it does not agree with the position we were told The City of Renton had adopted. Does anyone at City Hall give a damn? CPI A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS "It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single family lot to address these potential impacts." Parks Mitigation Pee City u, ..enton Department of Planning / Building / P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F6rKS COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 19, 2006 APPLICATION NO: LUA06-146, SHPL-H DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 5, 2006 APPLICANT: Conner Homes PROJECT MANAGER: Elizabeth Higgins PROJECT TITLE: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 PLAN REVIEW. Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 34,374 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): WA LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2°d Place I WORK ORDER NO. 77680 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of three vacant parcels, totaling 34,374 square feet, into five parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre dula. The proposed density would be 6.34 dula. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants IandlShoretine Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS ,Wv"Ie c/zt C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities EranspWation Public Services HistonclCulfurai Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dditional information is ne ded to properly assess this proposal. Signature of l5irector or Authorized Representative Date uti�� O �1 ; 'P�N�,o� NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Developmam Services Division of the City of Raritan. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAM&NUMl Puget Colony Shod Plat 21 LUAOS-146. SHPL-H PRDJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant for this lend use action has requested subdivision of three vacant parcels, totaling 34,374 square feetinto five parcels that werdd be sul abte for devetopri Orsingle famlly resdentlal. The Comprehensive Alen land use designahon is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 0, which allows 6 dwelling unilg per net arse dwa The proposed densdy woud be 6.34 dula. PROJECT LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2' Place PUBLIC APPROVALS: Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON. John Skoctdopole. Conner Homes, Tel: (425) 455-9250 Commants on the above application must be submthad in willing to Elizabeth Hlggine, Senior Planner, DeWlopmem Until Division. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 99015, by 5:00 PM On December 12, 2909. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public Mating on January 9, 2007, at 9:00 AM. Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, If you are interested in attending the hearing, phase contact the Development Services DI L-11 to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430.7212. If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal berore the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions abord this proposal, or wish 10 be made a party of record and receive additional Wonnarmn by mail, please call the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be rallied of any decision on this project. DATE OF APPLICATION: November 29, 2006 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 5, 20M DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 5, 2006 It you wpud like to be made a party of record to receive further information On this proposed protect, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning. 1056 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 96055. File Name i No.: Puget Colony Shoff Plat 2 I LUA06-146_ SHPL-H NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO. _ CERTIFICATION hereby certify that -3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3_ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on.��*` g DATE: l2-S-aSIGNED: ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in y e on the tray off �_ , t�� —• �L '� l v�—r� NO ARY PU LIC SIGNIII WA CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 51h day of December, 2006, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Ltr & NOA documents. This information was sent to: Name Re resentin John Skochdopole Applicant/Contact Richard Cory & Cindy Brandt Owners Robert & Cheryl Vangeystel Owners (Signature of Sender)_ STATE OF WASHING TON ) W ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that l know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fq&uvqts and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 1 D -1, Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Notary'Public in afiA for the S z AUe"' ��i Project Name: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 IProjeablumbiar.- LUA06-146, SHPL-H UX-fcf� 692800064002 152305910001 692800047007 BRANDT CORY RICHARD DANG PHU VAN+HIEN T+TRAN BE FORD STEVE B BRANDT CINDY JOY 14021 SE 136TH ST 14723 180TH FL SE 3038 198TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 SAMMAMISH WA 98075 692800052007 692800053005 386350005008 GALUSHA DICK & ELAINE HAUGEN CHRISTOPHER A JAY GERARD 1051 SHINE RD 14105 SE 135TH ST 13550 139TH PL SE PORT LUDLOW WA 98365 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 386350002005 386350003003 692800048005 JOHNSON PHILIP RYAN+MORGNN JOHNSTON GEORGE E+EMILY S JORDAN DAVID R 13564 139TH PL SE 13558 139TH PL SE 14004 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98059 692800060000 327615032007 692800046009 KAPELKA BENJAMIN LACHER THOMAS C LUEDTKE DOUGLAS E+SHANNON M 14100 SE 136TH ST 13606 139TH AVE SE 14018 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98055 327615030506 386350001007 692800059002 MARSDEN RICHARD L MILLER ALAN L MOREILLON DAN R+JANA 1818 S 310TH ST 13568 139TH PL SE 14110 SE 136TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98058 692800049003 692800055000 386350004001 NASH MORGAN & DEBRA NEEDHAM THOMAS PETERSON ALEXA A 14005 SE 135TH ST 13325 156TH AVE SE 13554 139TH PL SE RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 692800058004 692800050001 327615029003 SMITH ELEXA LEE SPENCER RICHARD+PAMELA STRAUB BRIAN C+TAKAKO 14105 143RD AVE SE 14013 SE 135TH ST 13921 SE 136TH PL RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 152305917089 692800062006 692800063004 URY KATHERINE Y TRST VAN GEYSTEL CHERYL VANGEYSTEL ROBERT+CHERYL 14011 SE 136TH ST 25507 75TH AVE SW 25507 75TH AVE SW RENTON WA 98059 VASHON WA 98070 VASHON WA 98070 692800044004 WELCH JASON S+VICTORIA J 14106 SE 135TH ST RENTON WA 98059 Kathy Keoiker, Mayor December 5, 2006 Michael Fortson Department of Transportation Renton School District 1220 N 41h Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 LUA06-146, SHPL-H CITY )F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The City of Menton Development Services Division has received an application for a 5-lot single- family subdivision located at 4900 Block of SE 2nd Place. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055 by December 19, 2006. Elementary School: Middle School: High School: , Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No Any Comments: Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7382. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, ins, AICP DEC 2 1 26iJUS Senior Planner Encl. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE 0 This paper contains 501,: recycled material, 30%post consumer - +fR)" jv Kathy Keolker, Mayor December 5, 2006 John Skochdopole Conner Homes 846 108th Avenue NE #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 LUA06-146, SHPL-H Dear Mr. Skochdopole: CIT OF RENTON Planning/Bui Iding/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. This matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on January 9, 2006 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner cc: Cory Richard & Cindy Brandt, Robert & Cheryl Vangeystel / Owners 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 MThk Hans.- r-nntainc Sfll%. --i.H m —i '4nai nnct frina .— RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE Y 01� + ru NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAMEINUMBER: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 1 LUA06-146, SHPL-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant for this land use action has requested subdivision of three vacant parcels totaling 34,374 square feet, into five parcels that would be suitable for development of single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Single Family Residential and the current zoning is Residential 8, which allows 8 dwelling units per net acre dula. The proposed density would be 6.34 du/a. PROJECT LOCATION: 4900 Block of SE 2ntl Place PUBLIC APPROVALS: Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: John Skochdopole, Conner Homes; Tel: (425) 455-9280 Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98066, by 5:00 PM on December 12, 2006. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on January 9, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-7282, If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: November 29, 2006 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 5, 2006 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: December 5, 2006 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98056. File Name! No.: Puget Colony Short Plat 2 I LUA06-146, SHPL-H NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT "U°'92006 MASTER APPLICATIONECE/VED PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Cory Richard and Cindy Joy Brandt ADDRESS:, 3038 198th Ave SE CITY: Sammamish ZIP: 98075 TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: John Skochdolpole, P.E. COMPANY (if applicable): Conner Homes ADDRESS: 846 108'''Ave. NE #202 CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-455-9�80 CONTACT PERSON NAME: SAME AS APPLICANT COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 4900 block of SE 2" d PL Renton - 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 6928000620 (Vangeystel) 6928000630 (Vangeystel) 6928000640 (Brandt) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant Single Family Residential PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single Family Residential EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A EXISTING ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 SITE AREA (in square feet). 34,374 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED; 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 0 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 6.34 DU/AC; NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 5 Q:web/pwJdevserv/forrns/planning/masterapp.doc 1 11 /21106 P JECT INFORMATION (con1 led NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 5 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Approx. 3,000 S.F. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n/a NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): n/a PROJECT VALUE: $1,250,000 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. ILEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 1 (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) 1 SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 15 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Short Plat 2 Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ 3. 4. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) CnN R4LI APA bra%J � + L I nay any RrA,1+ , declare that I am (please check one) --A the current owner of the property Involved in this application or the authorized re rese tative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. copi it,cr+arl .f -can A I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 4 C—A14 A Brd'A signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vole tart' ct for the r+ uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument (Signature of Owner/Representative) 'tl. JQ#t/ tiff rfl'�SA�y��,+s'y S Notary Public in an K,r a State of Washington j G Notary(Print) R, ,)0,5 OF My My appointment expires: 16 ~ Gfj rO'� Q:wet>/pw/devservJforms/planning/masterapp.doe 2 11 /21 /06 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: Robert & Cheryl Vangeystel ADDRESS: 25507 75`h Ave SW CITY: Vashon ZIP: 98070 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206-463-9371 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: John Skochdolpole, P.E. COMPANY (if applicable): Conner Homes ADDRESS: 846 1081h Ave. NE #202 CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-455-9280 CONTACT PERSON NAME: SAME AS APPLICANT COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 PROJECTIADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 4900 block of SE 2"d PL Renton - 98059 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 6928000620 (Vangeystel) 6928000630 (Vangeystel) 6928000640 (Brandt) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant Single Family Residential PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single Family Residential EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NIA EXISTING ZONING: R-8 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8 SITE AREA (in square feet): 34,374 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: 0 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 6.34 DU/AC NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 5 Q:web/pwldevserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doe i 11/21/06 I I P JECT INFORMATION (cons led NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Approx. 3,000 S.F. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n/a NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n!a NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): n/a PROJECT VALUE: S 12-,'50 ooc, IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft, ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal descri tion on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 15 , TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5 , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Short Plat 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namets) p*yg cn r h t s , declare that I am (please check one) Zthe current owner of the property involved in this application 14he authqU14d representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained a the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 90&4` C c h signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/heritheirgree abb volunthroct for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) ` `��\11111{tlt � f OAWON F ' Nti o� 01 A,?l Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary My appointment expires: ' `-f ) 1 Q: wets/pw/devscrv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 2 11 /15/06 Pre -application meeting for the Puget Colony Short Plats Hoquiam Ave SE and SE 2nd St and SE 2nd PI PRE06-127 City of Renton Development Services Division November 9, 2006 Contact information Planner: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP, (425) 430-7382 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Mike Dotson, (425) 430-7304 Fire Prevention Reviewer: James Gray (425) 430-7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, (425) 430-7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects and contractors who work on the project. Pre-screening: When you have the project ready for submittal, have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre -application meeting is informal and non -binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). /ti' o!�: i � FIRE DEPARTMENT � �s j. ♦+. IVI E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 26, 2006 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner FROM: James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal-� SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plat, 5000 Blk S 142°d St. SE Fire Department Comments: 1. A fire hydrant with 1000 GPM fire [low is required within 300 feet of all new single- family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3600 square feet in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 is required for all new single-family structures. 3. Fire department access roadways require a minimum 20-foot wide paved roadway. 4. All building addresses shall be visible from a public street. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i Apacifcccolonysp.doc �Y o PLANNING/BUILDING/ ♦ * PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT \�>`r 0) M E M O R A N D U M To: Elizabeth Higgins From: Mike Dotson y Date: November 6, 2006 Subject: PreApplication Review Comments PREAPP No. 06-127 Puget Colony Short Plat NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting Issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision, makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council).' Review comments may also need to he revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. I have reviewed the information provided in the preliminary application for this proposed short plat. The following comments assume the property is annexed to the City of Renton. WATER I. The proposed development is within the water service area of Water District 90 (WD 90, phone number 425-255-9600). The applicant will be required to obtain a certificate of water availability from the District and provide it to the City prior to the approval of the short plat. A fire flow analyses will be required to verify that the District's system can provide a minimum of 1,000 gpm. of available fire flow. Results of flow analysis shall be submitted to the City along with the certificate of water availability to ensure that adequate flow rate and pressure is available to serve the development. SANITARY SEWER 1. A City of Renton sewer main is permitted to be constructed approximately 200-400 feet to the east of this property. A sewer main extension to connect these properties will be required prior to recording a short plat_ 2. This parcel is subject to the East Renton Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD = $224.52 + interest per lot). Fees are collected at the time the utility construction permit is issued. 3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) is $1,017 per lot. SURFACE WATER 1. The project is required to do a drainage analysis and meet the design criteria in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (unless the analysis shows that detention is required). 2. The Surface Water System Development Charge (SDC) is $759 per building lot. These are payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Oplan reviewlplan review 2006lpuget colony sp pre-app.doc Page 2 of 2 11I09/2006 TRANSPORTATION 1. City Code requires street improvements, which include: paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, storm drainage and landscape will be required along the street frontage. 2. Traffic mitigation fees of $75 per additional generated trip shall be assessed per single family home at a rate of 9.57 trips. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Ordinance. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All utility and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost of construction estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. 3. If you have any questions please call me at 425430-7304. CC: Kayren Kittrick i,lplan reviewlplan review 20061puget colony sp pre-app.doe CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: September 14, 2006 TO: Pre -Application File No. PRE06-104 FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, (425) 430-7382 SUBJECT: Puget Colony Short Plats, Hoquiam Ave SE and SE 2nd St and SE 2nd PI General: We have completed a preliminary review of the above -referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Development Services Director, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planking and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax; from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall and are available on the City of Renton website (www.renton.ci.wa.us). Project Proposal: The proposal is to subdivide 4 existing lots into 6 lots suitable for development. The lots are in two discontinuous pairs (see zoning map). The properties are located at the 4000-5000 blocks of SE 2nd Street and SE 2nd Place west of where these roads intersect with Hoquiam Avenue SE. The subdivided lots on SE 2nd St would average 6,937 sf and on SE 2nd PI would average 8,015 sf. Current Use: The properties are currently undeveloped, but within a previous subdivision that has some single-family development. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: The property is located within the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. There is, however, a redesignation currently being processed by the City of Renton, the area of which includes the proposed subdivisions. The new designation would be Residential Low Density. The redesignation has been approved by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee and Planning and Development Committee and is scheduled to be approved by the City Council on December 51h. Because the redesignation has not been approved as of this date however, development information for both Residential Single Family and Residential Low Density Comprehensive Plan land use designations are included in this report. H:\Division.s\Develop.sertDev&plan.inglER-Ilpreapplication rzpons\2006 Preapplicalions\06-127 Puget Colony (R8, two 3-lot 5FR).doc Puget Colony Short Plats Pre ication Meeting November 9, 2006 Page 2 of 3 Zoning: The property is currently zoned Residential 8 (R-8). The proposed zoning would be Residential 4 (R-4). Single-family residential is the primary use in both of these zones. Development of one detached, single-family residence on each lot is allowed. Environmental Review: Subdivision of land into nine or fewer lots or tracts is exempt from Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review, unless critical areas are known to be on or near the site. There is a possibility both wetlands and moderately steep slopes (up to 25 percent) on one or more of these properties. Due to these factors, a geotechnical report may be required at the time building permits are requested. No environmental review would be required at the time of subdivision however. Density: The density range in the R-8 zone is between a minimum of 4 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) and 8 du/a. The allowed density in the R-4 zone is up to 4 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). The density of the SE 2nd Street short plat would be 6.27 du/a and the density of the SE 2nd Place would be 5.43. These densities would be allowed within the R-8 zone, but would be over the allowed density in the R-4 zone. Critical Areas: As stated above, the site may have critical areas present. It is the applicant's responsibility to ascertain whether critical areas will impact the proposed development. Development Standards: RMC 4-2-110A, "Development Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" apply to new development on the site. A copy of these standards is being provided at the pre -application meeting. Lot size and dimensions —The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf for parcels less than one acre in size prior to subdivision. Although one application is proposed, the project would actually comprise two short plats, at 0.49 and 0.55 acres each. Therefore, the minimum lot size would be 5,000 sf All existing lots currently meet the minimum lot size standard for the R-4 zone. The minimum width in the R-8 zone is 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots (there are no corner lots proposed). The SE 2nd St lots would meet this requirement through lot width averaging. The minimum lot depth is 65 feet. All proposed lots would meet this requirement. The lots currently meet the R-4 lot width and depth standards Lot coverage — Both the R-8 and R-4 zones allow a maximum building coverage of 35% or 2,500 sq. ft. on lots 5,000 sq. ft. or greater. Setbacks — Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private access easement. Setbacks are different for the front, side, and rear yards. The fagades fronting on the access street will be considered the front. In the R-8 zone, the front yard setback is required to be a minimum of 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage accessed from the front or side yard street. Side yards in the R-8 zone are 5 feet and the minimum rear yard setback is 20 feet. In the R-4 zone, the minimum front yard setback is 30 feet, the side yard setback is 15 feet "combined" with a minimum of 5 on one side, and the rear setback is 25 feet. Puget Colony Short Plats Pre _ : cation Meeting November 4, 2006 Page 3 of 3 Building height - Building height is restricted to 20 feet and 2 stories in both the R-8 and R-4 zones. In the R-4 zone, an additional 5 feet in height would be allowed, if the roof pitch exceeds 3/12. Landscaping: The development standards require that all pervious areas of residential lots be landscaped. All landscape areas are to include an underground irrigation system unless drought -tolerant plants are used. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of application. Access: All lots would be accessed indirectly from Hoquiam Ave SE by either SE 2"d St or SE 2nd Pl. Driveway slopes cannot exceed fifteen percent (15%) without a variance'from development standards. Driveways sloped eight percent (8%) or more must have slotted drains at the bottom of the slope. Permit Requirements: Three -lot short plats are reviewed administratively. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will approve, approve with conditions, or deny the short plats. If the preliminary short plats are approved, the applicant must complete the required improvements and satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before the plats can be recorded. The newly created lots may be sold only after the plat has been recorded. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat: • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. • A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 per new unit (single-family) • A park and recreation fee of $530.76. per new unit (single-family) Please see the comments from the Fire Prevention plans reviewer and Public Works plans reviewer for a breakdown of the fees. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is also included with the preapplication package for reference. Expiration: The preliminary short plat approval is valid for two years with a possible one- year extension. Its advance of submitting the full application: package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring in one copy of each application item for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensure that the application is complete prior to making all copies. cc: Jennifer Henning DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIO WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIKEMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS .}-i;'.'. - - - - ::tr�:tr.\f........ �1�(L*Y ''r itr �}W IYlif7'•,SCf:-r ::�r-•r�ti .XY%v�:i.•:v:..... ANT Calculations, ..r .....Y.. ... ... ........ .. ... .... .. S: ...ti...:.D: iS: .. .. .::: :::: .;::,.:. �:.::%s:'� :'.✓.'�: :r'i�r:i:i:;^�:r•:-}...r.x. gas%^ : .:y..... Construction Mitigation Description 2AND4 % -...:....:v:::.v:.v:...............:...x:.vn.........:::.v::xe-:x.:xv:xwx�.vxrxrx....::::::.............. .. x:� .': .::tivrit.:t-: Density Worksheet 4 n.:i::i?:i:}J: J.: . . .:.. .......... .::. .xv.. v..:.::v : ........::::.:.. ..1'J. _ _ y�p�yi _ �'�. 4 R�rf�:• r :.i Drainage Report z�s'-' �^ a J /�=..n•�? - 6'�j " - - - - ... . -.: ti�4T �. _ ..c .: iirrx:::i:.<v:_..rco:;.. ':tr tr;i.}ictr:..xo--..r - >>- i �v ..`.%..:. x:��:. ......-..-•-•-- ::::yh`i�rtr':.Yi•]`' xi.}�:M1:ij�.v:.is�i}��4.ti i+:.hi Environmental Checklist < :-• .y,µ-...F... Y.......................... ...r i:. - f • , ... .r:.ir..v:.v: y,:y� r i v^:T::..::.:: v::tr. .frvY: "4: f<-:'}:;, ti>ti �?'+�:lJpx'•:i::'.[.:tix•: �:i' v.S:..} Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 .:e'x:v .'.. ....' -....- t�- }.S`i; .ti:... .., .- -- .. •.. ?. ... Y.. ............................tr..r.:v.r:::::}-r:::::.r: . ......................................5!^:-...... ......, r-...f....,. .r...r.. ....--_-^..:.:...,-..:n:.:...,:r.,r.w:n.w.v:..:x:.:v....vw..vnv. vv .:.... n........ ............ ........... .....".s.!f:.,..x......_::::... .... .. ....... .5.............. F... ..tr..i.-. .: hrrr}:#f: - - Floor Plans 3AND4 :............ :.r- ::. :.:.:..:::::... . .... ..... .... ....... . ................n.......r.....v.6;-_.`-B.:C:.:.o::xr ..,-:.,-.:,,.:: x,::x„:.-n.:x-x ,�.1.�.. -.;;: -..11< . Grading Plan, Conceptual z s �y sii.. ��♦♦rrAAtt - - �: r.. �:: 'fYi:Y ; }v:.}:^'.. .:::... x: o-:::: :.:::°'.:"s-:::..:i..:r:•_ i.�.:::i:z:::' Yi?Yi?y�?:fir ..x.. ...._:::-..:r.r...........,: :• :':::: ...: ro's• _ .... Habitat Data Report 4t- ............ ..... ....... _ ........._................... ,.......:....:.x..:,.x.:;:.:.:.:.ri..:l.:.:.:n-xnx::.x:.x.xr::::..:::n:w: ,r.�::.:.:r:..r. -::..: .. ..... ........, _.._:..:..:.::..,_:..:.:'.. _n...,..::...:.,.::..:.::........ x......... �yypr{`�L ::q ;. .: r: i... r:} :lfi}ao-.:;-.•fi:: - f;gri-::tt _4 J.::.:.•S.. i:;:: v:..vvr.:v.:.:.w..lr:.v ::S.i riv:: .:}}:.}::': .- .. .t. �11-`r'F,YI..Y�. _... Irrigation Plan 4 .... .. .... .. ... ..y.,.��.� ....... ........... .:o-}' .. : 3 r r: r:.ar ......................... .......... ..... r..:, rr ri r .:.- .- -.. - :.:f:: r.:.: r.,.uv.:.......::.:i::.Y:�::.1.::.:.:.::.::-nn:n:•..v::v.w:{r:i. Landscape Plan, Conceptual /}+y :.:v.:.: .:.�...........:. :.:.:v::::.:y: ....:... - �+4S Y.... ... - ---'.:"^:�r:-::.r: ..i `".:+-.,..:::.:-::..x.:.:.vi..:x.:'.}:;.}:::f:;f Legal Description 4 ::.:..._ x..........._. ................... . ...5.. . .:...:.:... ..:.. �:..:..,-::::.:..,-x..v.:: .::: ,.:: ;• .: -:.}. tii.:.. nw::: -:.: v.:::: .:..- ..:...:.: v.,: rt r �,-r 'RR ........................r.,...r....:�.v...Yr�.�.-�.r�r ,-:..:..,....:... x.....:.....v.... ... .: - ...:.�:. .... �. - .. ..4::.:.:.xv Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 r.:r:........., .r:.:r............... .:.r: . r � : Master Application Form 4 �' (� f p r �y'.�. A`r .M��.lW�kf�fYv. .�lZr. �. . 3i:•� : . .. ..I ............................ .................... .... rf.. Neighborhood Detail Map 4 ¢ This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: �, $ `�� �'' i `7 2. Public Works Plan Review Section �- g� 3. Building Section DATE: ? n�i,ie!� t,nuc.R PLANNING 4. Development Planning Section NC Q:IWEBIPWIDEVSERV1FormslPlanninglwaivero#submittairegs_9-06.xls 09/06 7EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVEm OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS x%ry�o S:p� � ..rc .w:at:�^d� "�^c:{r ;so a. •:r� :- ��rcr :'{�.�:--"'-� $:iw.r�r:'�3,�,.. ;`."''����nFar�--.s-. Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis a - r �v.� .{kr`}•,- - „4, '°h\� .: :ice t?35'k` �`� ,,,.r.o-' Plat Dame Reservation 4 vmr% OR- -Yao-x .YrY. Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 MEN Rehabilitation Plan 4 y �• r . .� ... .. ? n '.. -: - -�.. "...": -. ` ''... 0^:.:.'. ^ w- wirfl'::,-nr,: rc}}rr.+ Site Plan 2AND 4 rh. Y • +fir _ :.vrrr-r:. ::.:";{..,: ::,:..::.{ r•:y:--;,�;-- .. x •„r.' %vo- c:. vr:: t.%-.. . o r"Li'.vv:. �::• .:: ... .:.v. .� � ' � . .v�bi-0.-S.v. -.: jC .v:.ik..' •.:.rCv'•�" i.. `�. : ."`: -. ..YC3.... :r`,�k 1v,: r'uW..• X -. . 'Sw Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 Street Profiles 2 Topography Map 3 -.r::.:r-.r:.:..:.:.r �. �: r; rv,.-rc:rr nrnr 'Y�- '-J6: r. -.rr. r,•:- - "M{:MY'S-Y: vY ...:.. .kiyr' 'ri:Yi-'CK?� 'Q'. ¢ �M C 'f. vK .. .. �`'[(•[4tc�� _ .... �}n �"m"-Y - . tiF' `.v:^}}'�l:Y.� .:�: h1tiF^ r�Fix-.�v:.l Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 :mow. �}.y,::" <xx ..�:• .}�. : -. .: .. :<�m':� �' �' ���� , �.v . �'�� •' <... .. .. r''k""+.�.:�2:.,-: ... :..•...r- � ", r.:rY :. .a � {' �e�'°•a''�.,�%vt :,ac ,:.: xCT',.'`'f•.�2ir.. a ya`�a.• l'0j k. Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 .,,.h � a •ate "Y .:.L•6'� Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 ' f �-�- � � �'�' �•"'`'�� �• tr9.�^'$.w-: Far: ,� ... aY:s :k •. :.xEkxv�`w � ,. •rcm " ..rt`E":..,�' • .x^r ' �:v ` ` ,� }t c,.r �:N :`.� ,kw: � .� x',"�`;:rY Wlreiess: Applicant Agreement Statement 2AND 3 Inventory of Existing S'teS a AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2ANa 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2AND 3 7 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: VC c-S-1 - L L S a. T VL rC DATE: Cl:1WEBV WIDEVSERVIFormsWlanninglwaiverofsubmitlairegs 9-o6ads 09/06 1`1{ DENSITY '� F� Nov 9 Zoos WORKSHEET RECEIVED City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. 34,374 square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include, Public streets* Private access easements" Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 0 square feet 0 square feet 0 square feet 2. 0 square feet 3. 34,374 square feet 4. .789 acres 5. units/lots 6. 6.34 = dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. NA20M061241Do&06124 Dens ityWorksheet _ PugetColuny2.doc 1 Last updated CORE DESIGN • Project Name • Project Size: * Location of Site: * Parcel Numbers DEVELOPMENT PlANNIN 1. 7-v ' _, .r•i�, v .� 1 RECEIVED Project Narrative Puget Colony Short Plat -- Renton, Washington Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 The total site is approximately .789 acres. Care Design, Inc. 14711 N.E. 29th Place, Suite 707 Bellevue, Washington 98007 425.885.7877 fax 425,885, 7963 www.coredesigninc.com The project is located along 4900 block of SE 2"d Place. Please see the neighborhood detail map for the specific location. 6928000620,6928000630 and 6928000640 • Current zoning: R-8 Residential 8 du/ac Surrounding zoning: North: (R-S) Residential 8 du/ac South: (R-4) Unicorporated King County West: (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac East: (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac a Current use: The site currently is currently vacant. • Soil type and Drainage: King County- Soils Report the site is entirely underlain by Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. Drainage will be provided by the existing storm system. • Proposed property use: The proposal is to subdivide the property into 5 single-family detached, fee simple, lots. • Access: The project is proposed to gain access from SE 2" Place. • (off -site improvements: None proposed at this time, an in -lieu fee will be paid for frontage improvements. s Est. Construction Costs: $ 1,750,000 • Est_ fair market value: $ 3,000,000 • Quantity and type of fill: At this point in the design process, the site is anticipated to be balanced by cutting and filling. If it is discovered that the site will need fill material, the applicant will submit a fill source statement at that time. • Trees to be removed: Efforts .rill be made to retain trees in the rear of the lots. ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVEYING + Land dedication: N/A Number, size, and density of lots: There are 5 lots proposed for each short plat. The average lot size is approximatcly 6,875 S.F. The net density is approximately 6.34 du/ac. • Proposed job shacks: The site may ha.,e a construction trailer during the construction of the devclopmcnt. + Modifications: N/A i Sewall Wetland Consulfirg, Inc. - 1103 W Meeker 5t Phone: 253a59-0515 Kert, WA 99032-5751 Fmc 2533-852-4732 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 9 2006 November 22, 2006 RECEIVED Steve Johns Conner Homes 846 108Eh Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: Wetland and Stream Analysis - Parcels #6928000540, 4550, #640, #630, & #620, City of Renton, Washington SWC Job#A6-268 Dear Steve, The report describes our findings in regards to jurisdictional wetlands, streams or buffers on Parcels #6928000540, #6928000550, #6928000640, #6928000630, & #6928000620, located in the City of Renton, Washington. Specifically, the site consists of two parcels (#6928000540, #6928000550) located on SE 2nd Street just west of its intersection with Hoquiam Avenue, and three parcels (#6928000640, #6928000630, & #6928000620) located on the north side of SE 2nd Place just west of its intersection with Hoquiam Avenue. The properties are currently undeveloped forested areas. 1.0 MZTHODOLOGY Ed Sewall of Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. investigated the site on October 9 and November 14, 2006, using methodology described in the Washington State Wetlands Identifteation Manual (WADOE, March 1997). This is the methodology currently recognized by the City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations. Soil colors were identified using the 1990 Edited and Revised Edition of the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Kollmorgen Instruments Corp, 1990). The Washington State Wetlands Identi/loa� Lion and Delineation Manual and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual both requires the use of the three -parameter approach in identifying and delineating wetlands. A wetland should support a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, have hydric soils and display wetland hydrology. To be Formerly Nr,;.=r .i 8-12 Weiland Consuffing. Inc Conner Puller Colony Jab#A6-268 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. November 22, 2006 Page 2 considered hydrophytic vegetation, over 509/6 of the dominant species in an area must have an indicator status of facultative (PAC), facultative wetland (FACW), or obligate wetland (OBL), according to the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed, 1988). A hydric soil is "a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part". Anaerobic conditions are indicated in the field by soils with low chromas (2 or less), as determined by using the Munsell Soil Color Charts; iron oxide mottles; hydrogen sulfide odor and other indicators. Generally, wetland hydrology is defined by inundation or saturation to the surface for a consecutive period of 12.5% or greater of the growing season. Areas that contain indicators of wetland hydrology between 5%- 12.5% of the growing season may or may not be wetlands depending upon other indicators. Field indicators include visual observation of soil inundation, saturation, oxidized rhizospheres, water marks on trees or other fixed objects, drift lines, etc. Under normal circumstances, indicators of all three parameters will be present in wetland areas. 2.0 OBSERVATIONS Prior to visiting the site a review of several inventories was conducted including the King County Soil Survey, National Wetlands Inventory Map, King County iMap website with sensitive areas overlays, and the WDNR Forest Practice Stream Typing Maps. No streams, wetlands or hydric soils are identified on any of the inventory maps for the site. Field Observations Parcels #6928000540, & #6928000550 As previously described, the site is undeveloped forest. These parcels sit approximately 2'-X higher than SE 2nd Street and contain a broken canopy of immature trees. The overstory includes several Douglas fir, alder and cottonwoods. Understory vegetation includes salmonberry, sword fern, Himalayan blackberry and bracken fern. Several trails and clearings are located on these parcels. Soil pits excavated on the site revealed a dry gravelly loam with soil colors of 10YR 3/2-3/4. No indicators of wetland vegetation, hydrology or hydric soil were observed on these parcels. Conner Puget [::olony-JobaA6-268 Sewall Welland Consulting Inc. November 22. 2006 Page 3 Parcels #6928000640, #692800063O0 & #6928000620 These three parcels slope to the southeast and include a gravel road and piles of lawn debris and old fill on the west side. These parcels are also forested primarily with 30-40 year old cottonwoods. A dense thicket of blackberry covers the understory mixed in with sword fern, Indian plum and some facultative hydrophytic species such as salmonberry. A small depression was observed near the center of this area and appears to be an old excavation or test pit. Soil pits excavated within this area revealed soils with a color of 10YR 2/2 with no hydric indicators. Even after record rainfalls of the previous week no wetland hydrology was observed in this area or anywhere else on the site. Off -site Areas A visual review of the properties abutting the site was conducted. All of the surrounding land is developed or lawn, and no indicators of any wetlands or streams were observed. However, the stream exiting the Shy Creek Property located east of Parcel #6928000550 and separated from this parcel by one other undeveloped parcel and Hoquiam is located 130' from the site. The stream was determined to be a Class 4 stream with a 35' buffer. This buffer does not extend onto the site. Conner Puget Co1onyJv&A6-268 Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. November 22, 2006 Page 4 Conclusion There are no jurisdictional wetlands, streams or buffers on the site If you have any questions in regards to this report or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (253) 859-0515 or at esewall@sewallwc.com . Sincerely, awollw Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. ' 'A wetya"',*%t�h Ed Sewall -' -- Senior Wetlands Ecologist (PWS #212) DEVELOPMENT Cf i v OF:a6NTo fgING RECEIVED PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 AND 2 RENTON, WASHINGTON prepared for CONNER HOMES 40 Project Manager: Rob Stevens, P.E. Prepared By: Gina R. Brooks, P.E. Df�Ai• �� ��, Qb Date: November, 2006 Core No.: 06124 EXPIRE-5 0` PROJECT OVERVIEW: The Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 is located on Lots 54 and 55 of the Conner Puget Colony Homes Plat. Lots 54 and 55 are located just west of 142"d Avenue SE on the south side of SE 135 h Street. The Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 is located on the west 37 feet of Lot 61 and Lots 62, 63, and 64 of the Conner Puget Colony Homes Plat. Lots 61, 62, 63, and 64 are located just east of 1406 Avenue SE on the north side of SE 136'' Street. See Vicinity Map on the following pages. The Conner Puget Colony Homes Plat was originally platted in 1968. The above referenced lots are currently vacant with forest cover. Drainage from the Short Plats sheet flows southeast ultimately to the northwest comer of 142"d Avenue SE and SE 136t' Street. Three lots will be created for Short Plat 1 and five lots will be created for Short Plat 2. No frontage improvements will be constructed as part of the development of these new lots. Drainage design for the subject sites are per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). As demonstrated on the following pages, the sites are exempt from providing detention and/or water quality treatment. N OFF -SITE ANALYSIS: Upstream Tributary Area The subject Lots receive only minor sheet flow from forested Lots 51, 52, and 53. Upon development of these upstream lots, the upstream area will essentially be eliminated. Downstream Analysis The downstream route for both Short Plats sheetflows east and southeast across existing lots to a concentration point located at the northwest comer of 142gd Avenue SE and SE 136th Street. Per the Boundary/Topographic Survey enclosed within the engineering plans for Shy Creek and the Level 1 Downstream Analysis for Shy Creek, both under separate cover, drainage captured by the existing catch basin is conveyed east in a 12" concrete pipe across 142"d Avenue SE to an outfall located at the northeast corner of the same intersection. Drainage is then captured by an adjacent 48" CMP intake which conveys the drainage south across SE 1361' Street. The outfall for the 48" CMP discharges to a creek which is referred to as Maplewood Creek. Per the Level 1 Downstream Analysis for Shy Creek, the Creek meanders south and west until reaching the outfall into Cedar River over 1-mile away. DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN: Per page 1.2.3-5 in the 1990 KCSWDM, an exemption from providing on -site peak rate runoff control is allowed if the proposed project site developed peak runoff rate for the 100-year, 24-hour design storm event is less than 0.5 cfs more than the peak runoff rate for the existing site conditions. As shown in the below calculations, the increase of flow above existing conditions during the 100-year, 24-hour storm event for both Short Plats is less than 0.5 cfs. Therefore, detention is not required for either Short Plat. Per page 1.3.5-1 in the 1990 KCSWDM, an exemption from providing water quality treatment is allowed if a proposed project contains less than 1 acre of new impervious surfaces that will be subject to vehicular use. See "C. Water Quality Treatment Exemption'' below for how these Short Plats are exempt from providing water quality treatment. A. Hydraulic Analysis Storm water runoff for the site was modeled using WaterWorks hydrology software and the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Methodology. The soil type on the sites is Alderwood (AgC) per the King County Soils Map. The soil type falls under hydrologic group C. The precipitation rates used for this analysis are as follows: •2-year, 24-hour storm -+ 2.00 in. • 100-year, 24-hour storm -4 3.90 in. The existing Lots are currently covered with second growth forest. The amount of new impervious area for the developed sites were derived from Table 3.5.2B of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 1680 000 F J� nwood C (RENTON QUADRANGLE) 122°07'30" 180 000 FEET i Boll SOILS MAP PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS I & 2 CORE NO.06124 KING COUNTY, ASHINGTON, SURFACE "' `6TER DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS INKING COUNTY VI lb HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP* derwovd C C Orcas Peat Oridia D D Arents, Alderwood Material Arents, Everett Material B Oval) C Beausite C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget D Briscot D Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earlmont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett A /B *Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D Kitsap C Shacar D Klaus C Si Sat C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Nellton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep, well -to -excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These sods have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D. (high runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of day soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. From SCS, TR-55, Second Edition, .tune 1986, Exhibh A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soft Interpretation Record. Form 05, September 1W8. M 3.5.2-2 11/92 ► l�;;Ow a tl�rr a� • .y kR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 4 .m%— a I nos au •% �� A M yr A r% AI lJAl lfl t Moc"Mn Y1� KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WA" ER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curare numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C D Cultivated land(t): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 2 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 so (i) 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 498 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 1o0 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU_(GA 50 .0 bU/GA 52 6.o at�r/Gn 54 - --C,7. Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) - For a more detailed .description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. j 3.5.2-3 11t92 CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 1 Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 covers a total area of 20,813 square feet or 0.48 acre. Three new lots will be developed over this area creating 3 lots/0.48 acre = 6.25 DU/AC. According to Table 3.5.2B of the 1990 KCSWDM, the percentage of impervious area for the site is 53.0 %. The impervious area is therefore, 53.0°/o*20,813 square feet = 11,031 square feet or 0.25 acre. See attached Waterworks printouts on the following pages. CONNER PUGET COLONY Total Area = 0.48 acre SHORT PLAT 1 EMSTING CONDITIONS GROUND COVER AREA(acre) CN 2° Growth Forest 0.48 81 Time of concentration See Site Plan exhibit on the 49.30 min. previous pages (See Waterworks printouts for calculation 100- ear, 24-hour peak flow 0.12 cfs CONKER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 1 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Total Area = 0.48 acre GROUND COVER AREA acre CN Lawn/Landscaping 0.23 86 Impervious 0.25 98 Time of concentration Assumed 5.00 min. 100- ear, 24-hour peak flow 0.33 cfs S. E. '�D .._ ._ `. - -- � � RIM=386.46 a-1 4'34'40" W--38�41 — IN TAKE — L—.234.05 18"CM P E = 383.36 -- — — _ 1-r 24"IE E=NOT LOCATED L 432.53 d-06`47'22" -- — 89°�09"W l iQ 1 L=198.48 { 5d.00 . f -- P I w 0 �` - Vs OUTFALL 0 �I 12 CONC E=384.43 " "ELECTRIC ! 5' UNDERG OUND `��OUND -= EA EMENI T TO PUG T POWER 12" IE E=383.47 E s n AN -LIGHT RED . NO,. 640 ;;2-1 ' _ . au TFALL I � 3 I 12"IE W=38u-29 . !IZ � ll I i o I 53 54 + f[[ i I I i II I SDMH I RIM =. 36"IE 36"IE 24"IE I 4 2 4"1 E 4 V PAINT ELEPHOf POWER F w Ln co<�— C7 L RIM—� 36"IE 1 36"IE I I i . NB829'12 �'W 16J 77 CALC. (16J79 PLAT) L F1iEL 11/15/06 11::__.0 am Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 1 PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO. 06124 BASIN SUKnARY BASIN ID: PCIEX100 NAME: PUGET COLONY SP 1 EXIST 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.48 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPEIA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION....: 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.48 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: I0.00 min CN.... : 81.00 0.00 TC.... : 49.30 min 0.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 129.00 ns:0.8000 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0300 PEAK RATE: 0.12 cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min 11/15/06 11:3_.- am Dodds Engineers, yncorporated page 1 PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO. 06124 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: PC1D100 NAME: PUGET COLONY SP 1 DEV 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.43 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPElA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION....: 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.23 Acres 0.25 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN....: 86.00 98.00 TC..... 5.00 min 5.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.33 cfs VOL: 0.12 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 covers a total area of 33,666 square feet or 0.77 acre. Five new lots will be developed over this area creating 5 lots/0.77 acre = 6.49 DU/AC. According to Table 3.5.2B of the 1990 KCSWDM, the percentage of impervious area for the site is 54.01/o. The impervious area is therefore, 54.0%*33,666 square feet = 18,180 square feet or 0.42 acre. See attached Waterworks printouts on the following pages. CONNER PUGET COLONY Total Area = 0.77 acre SHORT PLAT 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS GROUND COVER AREA acre CN 2" Growth Forest 0.77 81 Time of concentration See Site Plan exhibit on the 88.81 min. previous pages (See Waterworks printouts for calculation 100- ear, 24-hour peak flow 0.15 cfs CONNER PUGET COLONY SHORT PLAT 2 DEVELOPED CONDITIONS Total Area = 0.77 acre GROUND COVER AREA acre} CN Lawn/LandscapingLawn/Landscaping 0.35 86 Impervious 0.42 98 Time of concentration Assumed 5.00 min. 100- ear, 24-hour peak flow 0.54 cfs 10' DRAINAGE EASEMENT I PER PLAT W C6 r-� w a c 0 A18829'12"W 264.86 42,01_. 42' LL- J U �^. 0 a :. - - Il �' �h DF -ROUND I I CTRIr 11 04SEMENT TO PUGET SOUND POWER 0 AND LIGHT REC. NO. 6404210 INTAKE 2" COr�C E=386.69 I �„ 307.47 R0AC N88'29'12)"W 67C0 47 SOUND 4„K.4"T- ONCRE.TE ,I� S.E. ��� ��� F� J T A I T I1 ,._ 11/16/06 3:2— pm Dodds Engineers, Incorporated page 1 PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO. 06124 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: PC2EX100 NAME: PUGET COLONY SP 2 EXIST 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.77 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPEIA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION....: 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.77 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN....: 81.00 0.00 TC..... 88.81 min 0.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 108.00 ns:0.8000 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.1500 TcReach - Sheet L: 187.00 ris:0.8000 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0300 PEAK RATE: 0.15 cfs VOL: 0.13 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min 11/16/06 3:23:,� pm Dodds Engineers, incorporated page 1 PUGET COLONY SHORT PLATS 1 & 2 CORE NO. 06124 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: PC2D100 NAME: PUGET COLONY SP 2 DEV 100 YR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.77 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPEIA PERV IMP PRECIPITATION....: 3.90 inches AREA..: 0.35 Acres 0.42 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 miry CN....: 86.00 98.00 TC..... 5.00 min 5.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.54 cfs VOL: 0.20 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min B. Detention Exemption Per page 1.2.3-5 in the 1990 KCSWDM, an exemption from providing on -site peak rate runoff control is allowed if the proposed project site developed peak runoff rate for the 100-year, 24-hour design storm event is less than 0.5 cfs more than the peak runoff rate for the existing site conditions. The increase of flow above existing conditions during the 100-year, 24-hour storm event for Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 is 0.33 cfs — 0.12 cfs = 0.21 cfs < 0.5 cfs. The increase of flow above existing conditions during the 100-year, 24-hour storm event for Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 is 0.54 cfs — 0.15 cfs = 0.39 cfs < 0.5 cfs. Since both Short Plats do not exceed the 0.5 cfs threshold for detention installation, the subject projects will not be required to install detention systems. C. Water Quality Treatment Exemption Per page 1.3.5-1 in the 1990 KCSWDM, an exemption from providing water quality treatment is allowed if a proposed project contains less than 1 acre of new impervious surfaces that will be subject to vehicular use. Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 1 will have 0.25 acre of impervious surfaces. Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 will have 0.42 acre of impervious surfaces. Since both Short Plats do not exceed the 1 acre impervious area threshold for water duality treatment installation, the subject projects will not be required to install water quality treatment systems. King County DDES DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa 98055-1219 This certifi provides the Seattle King County De,,u,.ment of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. King County Certificate of Water Availability Do not write in this box number name ❑ Building Permit 0 Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or other Applicant's name: Conner Homes Company Contact: Steve Johns ph#425-646-4439 Proposed use: Single Family Residences — 5 Lots Location: SE 136t' Street, Renton, WA 98059 (Parcel # 692800-0620 & 0630) (attach map and legal description if necessary) DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 2 9 2006 RECEIVED ❑ a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing _E(size) water main that Is fronting the site. OR ® b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of- 0 (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or ❑ (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or ® (3) Other (describe): Devel?Xers Extension required. District will require all related easements prior to construction. Main on 136 will need to be replaced and Hydrants to be installed. AC main on 140th may have to be moved. ® a. The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval). 3. 0 a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. © a. Water is available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant M feet from the last lot (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of flow at Peak Demand Duration ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ less than 1 hour ❑ 500 to 999 gpm ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours 0 1000 gpm or more ® 2 hours or more ❑ flow test of gpm ❑ other ❑ calculation of gpm (Note: Commercial building permits which includes (multifamily structures require flow test or calculation.) OR ❑ b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow, 5. ® a. Water system has certificates of water right or water right claims sufficient to provide service. OR ❑ b. Water system does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claims. Comments/conditions: Fees after installation of main and hydrants, per Lot = WAC @ $125, GFC @ $3,200, 3/a" Meter @ $500 = $3,825.00 FEES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for 1year from date of signature. ICING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT #90 LESTER PIELE RENEWAL FEES: W/ IN 1 YEAR $50.00 Agency name Signatory name AFTER 1 YEAR $125.00 11/20/06 SUPERINTENDENT Title Signature Date Z:IWater Availability CertificateslWater Availability\Conner Homes-136th, 5 lots.doc AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASH I NGTON ) COUNTY OF KING Michael Chen , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: DEV C TY ()F REPNTTON LANN1NG NOV 2 9 2006 RECEIVED 1. On the 281h day of November 2006, I installed 1 public information sign(s) and plastic flyer box on the property located at 4900 Block of SE 2"d Place for the following project: Conner Puget Colony Short Plat 2 Project name Conner Homes, Inc. Owner Name 2. 1 have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign, 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Code. Installer Signature �� SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 28th day of November 2006 LAURIE K. BARNHART NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON Laurie K. Barnhart COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 22, 2008 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Carnation, WA My commission expires on 7-22-08 N:1NW061241Do&06124 Sign Aff Puget02.doc 1 1 r22. 06 rt N b n. G 30 219 W 4e 21� 21a �y fi0 l 0 ui 190 13 7G.31 � Pi i go l0 2 3 f 4 5 6 7 9# 70.3 ,tea 641 �0.4 ox , -07V. 15 " 4 13 12 II 10 9 �I4 16 F '`�° — 75 � M1 17 �,, srss R CT 2 ■ � � r � 72 s�01 •$ H Is M 19 N 20 21 '22 — 23 " ■ 24 = W 5a Q — 31 30 29 28 27 26 X 25 a � � b } I ,z SdPI �A,b 32 ,a IST ST S 1>v 33 P 34 5 36 37 38 39 40 ISL.A 59T m., BI.IS 6�36 To 47 46 45 44 43 N 42 4I _ 46 Z r IS 19n,16 n � SE���-is49a cf S. ®~ ' a x vo ci 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 R T57 z 6 60 59 56 T c.' S.C. T 31 T.23N. R.5 E. $E MD �PL. s • 1657165.77* � 165.71t N (I)GC Xf F I ! In a lu e � lid � �� to to m f4 �° � e 1657Z I? (4) N b (A) I' SUP 201 280031 ej o5Ti w 43 66 (31 s 926 300.E LJ SD t9 S. P. 488038 `v 1.38 A C. �tj N 2b6.8+ as _ 60 IL Er5m.T 510 'oC .4, o I to 601.'75on 598.27) en 25 ros rl IdS o v I09 � Vol - 28 F e!1 hl gn M O � o to m 29 M r Ai Rj us (589T) o � 4 C, a eq n � tir 13 OS U pE.7 OS) R --- it 'psi � p5,43 133.84 0 O SV0.62AC. Z I �, , �11111 19575z Q E33.84 9 3d I coi �1357A 2 f 3 W I! LLjr35T3 3 1�Z1 f h: 163 � W 4 �3b33 1 w� 13s m o 0.438 fi 75 05 16369 !! 1�3,1= 06 164a S 13 T4 30 0l Printed: 11-29-2006 Payment Made CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permitt LUA06-146 11 /29/2006 08:12 AM Total Payment: 1,000.00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: OeveOPM Clfyonr PLANIV N7pN I Na Nov 9 2006 RECEIVE Receipt Number: R0605871 Payee: CONNER HOMES COMPANY Trans Account Code Description Amount ------ ------------------------------------------------ ---------------- 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 1,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- -------- --------------------------- --------------- Payment Check 56450 1,000.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------ 3021 ------------------ 303.000.00.345.85 ------------------------------ Park Mitigation Fee --------------- .00 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental. Review .00 5011 000.345,81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345,81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000,345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81,00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00-00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000,05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 NOTE: Kroll Maps are cxompifed from Official Records and Field Surreys. Tf7ey are produced for references use 8 p 5 E -23- 5 OE o .-. only and no warranty 1s expressed or implied. n ..,_. 10 �- . w r rw.w:� . rr.•�.•�. . ��r i . w •�.r.. �....r •� i •w. •�r�.� • r��. a.^.� • w:� •� . r.�� i ,...r..w a �+.�� i err �.i • •�• �,.i • • • rr�•w •.i • ��ir • r •'ter ♦ ,.ter :r r `rr�r� .:��w.:r •r • i • •.:`r. r r..:�= i :..�.•..y�► i.i. •r •�ww.w s • •r .�.i.� •r r•..•�.i.i i �rwr�n i :.ram i '�.•�•..:.� i �..� r�.w` • ,rrr 15 ... .. .. ... ..... .. ....... ... _....... - - - �- ^_ _ _�__�_ __ MANIFOLD RD_j .:.. 15 14_ :.. ''TF. MAN 30 341 Z „� 24�.t4 85 82a45 6a, ea ;�-..... 1 300.30 . ••-• 3n1"•`�� t y i J ENTO�N N1C (6(1.75) ei 22 ors cn CV N N -' 82.145 68 fi r N I r, N e m COrn 4 � 1 w 4 °° 150.145 m �-• to st"; � 4S �� 19 47 � 33 0 1. 1'SQ (6S fil ,... Ib5 1•.... - Zfi75 _ _ ---- L_L0�-----�--45-- 2i 23 ' 20 >d7' 67 90 8o 140 60 15)Isu 300 300-01 v `i v v 601: I5 (600.01) Ln U+I w o to 67.10 67 67 90 80 140 tn N "' 94 8Z 7Z 72 17.0 /Z 31 ''� w. O EM M Z o _ w 39 !T@ @cc �� zs o s ra • 625.43 52 72 '12 7z IZO o o .... 30 259.23 599.43) 34Z j { f �1} c3p OR k m col 240 n C in Q • 19_ u > v N 4.94 A0. 1 �2� M _ r__5 rn en 1�2 Z40 62 !2 ri 300.7' 1.27 250 M 4a • 0 0 - - .---- -�3° { 3 ) o. s7 A c 601,75 (598.85) (S. E. 131ST ST. } 15Q 0 175 IM55 S-P.88105 Q 5r co Cn t 13 (2) i3) (4) � � o m � � ` 26 300 6 . � q a 1- I 52 7 a) Iz I W 55 4f Wl �i � '" tJJ 30 21s S. P. 488038 N N 1.38 A C.60 Q W�� a8 2i7 218 ��.} 65 6U 1509 30 53 54 ' l 0 150 13 76.31 rsM: 310 S. E. 13 �". s • `$I � C. ( CENTRAL AVE.) si26 74 '14 54.45 601.75 598.27j 68 300.81 300.87 t 6Q oo � • � !05 1 3 `a o Ln J f� < O /Z Q la.>4 va AfAlly asm 74 rr} 25 /32� N 69 7a ,3r f5tA14 1Ci.470.3 69t1 688 641 70 ��u+ 6! r rn p 'ate 15 � p14 � 13 112 it 10 9 B3 � `� rn AC K LOAR Q 97. � � w ' , n c ..L. ,�► 'r' = -- -- - ! 75 74 _. _ - 300.875 62 Wi50.438 i- 300.87 30 0. 87 s0 . it 17 �� -C - --- 14ti50 154:2V40.5 301 (�j 6d17a (597.70} ma's- 72 $7.01 •pt' �(0 21 I a ,•,n p•, ,r r on . 4r 7656 (2) (3) IS 19 20 ; 21 22 23 24LU 77 �' • 3C a Ia ! 2¢ 73 120 8R 7.3 .66 7132 77 _ r 30075 301 SP 37'`J105T t" 80 � a o �- cn 2g 0 120 1 q 48135 d' 25 4 3130 29 28 27 �' 26 F R E TRAG t cn to 3j • !� � � � - W �•-y eli �n ; rp 1 .. -r2 37.Oi aro l3ZIQ6r .. �• � L.LL..JJJ1I �s ra sr =•w � • 32 �,� .2 55 rz wllniellrtu ST.597.t1 {S97,12) Q_ 330 •^ `-' 6 cp to 36 s 37 3$ 39 44 r r i m 34 5 os.� 1s s4�s 10 lil � �� �^ � 4 N � � �' 1 3 15b.is 597 $0 0 crio r 47 N 42 41 i0 a. 4S 45 44 43 Nr 13f3D T7*U t o Z ~ y �• L tA 7s i15 _! L � Y !~ t35 ioo.36 `� n v SE 75 � SO �iK~ i � 2(589.7) t rs ( 59 .53) (596.54) ND,ST 1 49 ,,� s,.s� a e` rn � � V 1 :o }r : %R co . 50 51 52 53 -- 10 3 r 15 cn Tl.tti20 ".. _ • EZ." � rAl --)8 r5r ~ � ib �' I � W m W 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 m _ I 13 OS _ - J 01 1. IL 7A FO !40 ga L �1000 'r 74 ,. K r4 53-55 601.75 (588.es) " �� 601.15 (a`35.95) 60 60I.75 (595.96) `-� 3o CEN-- SEC. 15 �, �i ._=_ =_= E. -� -_=� = ml 36TH S ( SOUTH AVE.) � T. 23 N. R. 5 E .l 77 SE 2ND PLII[ 327.6e 1311.91 f 5�14 8 I 1 w t� 1� � 1 165:i7� 16577+ I 165.77± 115.43 133.8�4 3,0 1 [ f ,1; 30 , in 062 AC. Zo 81 0 1 e1 133.34 30 m 7 • Go �.t.: 2 §106) 0 0 13574 "~' co56107 E� �) • ' 3 0 . , 163 �. uj -tit �h .�D l3S33 - 1 �i k � �� �� 00,43 t M a 1 e W 0 0 d r70 � � t3S 72 �' IfWk �` 7' 2 a 163 ) I`° 201 5 Q (4) C (A) 13s. t1 21 " W � S.P. 280031 0 l�6a x N e i b o r h 0o d P a r k Fb5.71 � 6 IG435 `S 13S.70 3o c o 33 66 rn W ;}�' !36 J V4 (3) a SR 880059R S.P 574002 (2) 2rs �, o �' 7 !zo � a3 �' 11G.07 _ w 107, 165 70 165.b9} i .69t I 328.72 .E. TH� i6570 6b2 78� 627.43 30 7488 70 i175C1 13810 12 {{50• 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 ' 0 d 11753W 8 N yr c �- 13 5533 X80 .. .76. �4573 � S.E. 138TH . -� M' ACCC.0 - �. vrVZ ESMr Q 7065 9z 75, 63�41 � ,�'1 P LM • � 1 14 � z irt�t B 1214 A x 0- �'} D c• �� N =Z�s z3�22 23 24 50 li'_4 N ��} men ai `i5 I- T g SP. 883036 _ 20 - �I Ms - 0 a 16 ,� 400 � 867 26 _ • `° 2 r3 39 L' 4r �"� 124 • 30 52 13wo 17 18 19 27 00 1 . 15361 14. 166 50 124A2 i93 y rye 143.6 17-4 69 11947- tZ5.°L . [RZ �lJ 49 x� S. E . -139TH �1� P L.. 11 42 a 41 's 23 ' rp IM W U 7°.9 M I z.5z 103.52 46 • '� � 24 � tZs 14a� 66 � 47 N 43 Aa 19 7 itir al �• � � ^� � • igs 22 3p ' N ,� 40_ 25 658.91 ° • (S.E. 140TH ST.) s5s.s1 ESMr. 19 ra7 �126 2 X48 � S5 48 L '° v � 10 N SP. 97 026 R SSE. �,,140TH $T. 2!1 rs �3 45"44 9§.25 = 7,5.18 3 2 1 15K7 .� 115.5 k95 , W i5i 3 le - _ 21 4 ,--�- 3 6 ao o t3s la.sa �. ,�, 3$ 26 `"• 4 ' " ui 1 Lj - 64 49 G3 � d r �j c� 1 �Ron S.E. I40TH zo (3) (4) 4 z 1 5,8z 140 �'`'� 4 --1 alai � �s ax �� 27 �"" ap i 7 0 UJ ' o 0 i5s I�s.7 63 50 �, �•• Ito fib +,--- ` �a WlT b �7 t 5 35 Y 36 37 38 2$ 19 •� i5 . ► o 8 p !4a 3 13, 51 .5 9'f 10 0, 0"3 63e+vsva [A tlz w- �IN.a emu. r -.34 33 32 1 30 29 l8 30 ti 61 52 ` � as > j G jUB ORUO OD DE TA IL MA P r!¢ w rso 7 sfi.xz " > >� 17 3/ ' 135.65 NEI - � = so 53 � S. E. 140T•H ILL. C. rsa 8 Si 1n n uge-ft Iff M t I n �3 59 54 N N 16 I 71 r IZZ ! ���. 9 - 10 N 1 ! 12 13 14 1 .�o 135.6E An Sa 55 1-" t A? { B; Vo lit Ila !p ,„ i2E lZ8 8 7 6 $ 4 3 2 ! oe ,.. ,n 5#� 97 OQ311urt � N � s � o3 i M 57 56 � A° m �• . 77 7 W/4 4 �y bd t03.5T t42A6 ��► t 1 et,3 tli.5 �.1 S.E RENTWASHINGTON o � L' � �`U`�R�.e� � $ S.E. 142ND iij 4 1 s � ST. t o r C4 117.$I i 115.41 116.59 �'�i nj$3 11Cr49 11769 B '$� iIS,9 t2t3.sa ' $ 2 Q 3,� ! a ii. 18 19 `� 36 A 1 '� f8 4 CONNER HOMES� 4A 4 en � wl �t � 4 0 >SQm6 E . t2a�e 2 ..,..� 17 20 r 35 2 & r- 17 iSIB- � S p .as ek t+l�s 14r.45 U) 1. ' 21 C< �e Design, In��, Engcneer�ing I'll�nning • > ul�ve�ing � I I'm L,C� A P L16E','W �� 1t� . �,; 70 '�� a4 SQ 3 ul.� 91)34 3 - -l6o: 06124 November 15� 7a�4t� „�, 4 a 2 r,��] :oz 128.34 s3 _ 2 ��1�i :1261 a7.fa �� 4 4 X r 15 22 33 4 - Q„ = 15 IQ9.95 ''14t.'J5 � 141.95 a1.8 10 23 _ { toll i IZ844 N o ar�4 MI. 3 1 - f4 23 a = 32 x = 0 14 6I v v, o g o '""" ( 141.94 t 7 �•••• 141.47 6 • 38 Ui ` f,� S2470 H ERI 13 ; a 6 �- 13 24 25 9 200f p E. a 12v51 141. a 44 40 I+i W-92 1C.46 ci.r ,".'. ar a Igo 127.•!•J T tg 3a 143 RR D P L. �' �' _� 7. r zt5vs 48 -. z155 • 29 28 27 26 j't") �, 92 92.50 ' 7� ,� in 71ld.st '"12 p 25 r= tar.9 30 7 r HI 12 4 6 ��, 12 n 1oa ItS.ts � t' � us .. `mD 1 M Iza.Sa " �; sus 8 _ 26 r 29 N 52 15 60 9m 8 50 J16$ @ 41- 11 141 87u 32.33 o`�' 50.65 70 E21.z9 � �,I1g49 �t7.47 Sri7& 5mroStftB � 14 M y r: � � � �s 3ti 13 9 m IQ 27 F Q 28 10 �P' 105.08 t723i3 a �B :...._•... r..,.... _....... ..... ......,............_ . _.__ ....... _ _..... Q.r.... S.E.-- - -- 4 4T H - •�--ST . ... _....,�. % ..____ . °° . �.w.......... zz.4 ,S • . ..�. � ... h ,. _ _._.,,: . _._.1e3,4, ...... 14 815E 22!23 LEGEND pl.1=ASE NOTE: Kroll Atlas Pages are revised at least once a year with regard top] -ts, ATLAS OF S EATTLE . structural infomlation is • .• . •' •' • short lass, condominiums, and corporate limits. Addressinr7 and afro PAVING -• • • • •- RAILROAD p WATER MAIN 8 HYDRANT ---6' �-""�- BUILDING updated less ftequen ly. This map is copyrighted in Moth form and contert. Reproduction K p O L L MAP COMPANY O M P /� A n y I N /"► S E ]► TTL E in whole or in part. or transferring Into digital form, is prohibited by few. LZ 4 �•{ {� t �,,/ • !�1 SEWER -»--- 8=-•- HOUSE NUMBER ! 3 Copyright 1997, Kroll Map Company, Inc. - Seattle, Washington. All rights reserve d. SCALE: 1 1 I11 r »= 200 FT. COPYRIGHT K R O LL MAP COMPANY, INC. COUNTY TAX LOT NO. PUGET COLONY 1 CORE #06124 +� 3 4 6 5TDV# 6. � G E- AR ROVE.PA K I N �' 66.17 85.7 A. I as-$ A 65.97