HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal
Advertising Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of
general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months
prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in
the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as
a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues
of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was
regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.
The annexed notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on March 19, 2008.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is
the sum of $247.80.
L n a M. ills �'�, i
=�5'Dq5`'&
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter N F+'rrq ,C"r,�r
i
�
Subscribed and sworn to me this 19th day of March, 2008. J �' Ag`=Q�aR�
U -
at y Dal g, Votary Public or tfte State of Washington, Re�cl�ti`"��r,,,,,
P. Co0. Nugton, Washington j4O 1�wP+s�~~`
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
RENTON, WASHINGTON
Land Use N mber and Application Name:
LTJXN-mil , ECF Assisted Living (Docket
#106-28) and Maximum Height Requirement
for Utilities in Residential Zones (Docket
407-01).
Project Locations and Descriptions: There
are two proposed land use amendments to
the municipal code. These are city-wide
changes versus site specific projects.
Assisted Living; This proposal will have
multiple code amendments addressing
assisted living facilities. Proposed
amendments:
New definitions for assisted living as a
land use and assisted living as a type of
multifamily. The multi -family definition
allows kitchens in units and the land
use definition indicates that the staff
administers an element of personal care
to residents. Also, to strike the definition
for retirement residences,
Revise the definition for convalescent
centers so that the distinction between
assisted living and convalescent is clear
and identifies that a skilled nursing staff
administers convalescent care,
Apply density standards to assisted
living facilities, but allow them to
develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per the
base density of the zone,
Allow assisted living facilities in the
R-14 zone- l .in* assisted living facilities
in the R- l and R-10 zones to a maximum
of 18 total residential units per acre,
Include assisted living the parking
standards table and require 1 parking
space per residential unit of assisted
living, plus dedicated parking spaces for
facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for
Utilities in Residential Zones: This
proposal addresses the maximum heights
for essential public utility facilities within
residential zones, required setbacks
for such facilities, and neighborhood
compatibility of facilities above fifty (50)
feet. Proposed code amendments:
Amendment to Maximum Height for
Public Water Facilities
The proposed height for aboveground
and elevated water reservoirs and public
utility facilities is:
175 feet for aboveground standpipe
water reservoir, an elevated water tank,
a water treatment facility to the highest
point of the water storage reservoir.
50 feet maximum height for water
facilities, such as water treatment
facilities, and pump stations.
Allow additional setbacks for water
treatment facilities and pump stations
through the administrative site plan
review process.
Allow modification to lot coverage
through the administrative site plan
review process,
Require graphic treatment of water
tanks.
Public art to be reviewed by the Renton
Municipal Arts Commission.
Application Date: March 14, 2008.
Permits/Review Requested: Environmental
(SEPA) Review, Zoning Text Amendment.
Location where application may be
reviewed: Department of Community and
Economic Development, Strategic Planning
Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,
WA 98055.
PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing
on these issues will be held before the City
Council on March 24, 2008.
Development Regulations Used for Project
Mitigation: These non -project actions will
be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance
and Development Regulations and other
applicable code and regulations as
appropriate.
Proposed Mitigation Measures: The
analysis of the proposal does not reveal any
adverse environmental impact, r�quirin,
mitigation above and beyond existing code
provision. However, mitigation may be
necessary and may be imposed at the lime
of a site specific development proposal on
the subject site.
Comments on the above application
must be submitted in writing to Angie
Mathias, Associate Planner, Department of
Community and Economic Development,
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055,
by 5:00 p.m. on Mauch 28, 2007. If you
have questions about this proposal, or wish
to be made a party of record and receive
additional notification by mail, contact the
Project Manager. Anyone who submits
written comments will automatically
become a party of record and will be
notified of any decision on this project.
CONTACT NUMBER: (425) 430-6588
Published in the Renton Reporter on
March 19, 2W8. #581 l 1
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 29, 2010
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Stacy M Tucker
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office.
Assisted Living and Maximum Height Requirements for Utilities in
Fe-
Residential Zones Amendments
Number:
LUA-08-021, ECF
Cross-References:ame:
AKA`s:
Project Manager.,
Angie Mathias
Acceptance Date:
March 19, 2008
Applicant:
City of Renton
Owner:
N/A
Contact:
Rebecca Lind
PID Number:
N/A
ERC Approval Date:
April 8, 2008
ERC Appeal Date:
April 28, 2008
Administrative Denial:
Appeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision:
Date:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision:
Date:
Mylar Recording Number:
Project Description: 2007 Docket - 2 items: Assisted Living and Maximum Height Requirement
for utilities In residential zones.
Location:
Citywide
Comments:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal
Advertising Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of
general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months
prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in
the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as
a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues
of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was
regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.
The annexed notice, a.
Public Notice
was published on April 12, 2008.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is
the sum of $163.80.
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Location: Citywide. Maximum Height
DETERMINATION Requirement for Utilities in Residential
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Zones: The amendment is to increase the
COMMITTEE maximum height for public water facilities.
RENTON, WASHINGTON The proposed height for aboveground and
The Environmental Review Committee has elevated water reservoirs and public utility
issued a Determination of Non -Significance facilities is: 175 feet for aboveground
for the following project under the authority standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water
of the Renton Municipal Code. tank, and 50 feet maximum height for water
Assisted Living and Maximum Height facilities, such as water treatment facilities,
Requirement for Utilities in Residential and pump stations. Also additional
Zones Amendments setbacks for water treatment facilities and
LUA 08-021, ECF pump stations would be allowed through
Location: Citywide. Assisted Living: The the administrative site plan review process.
amendment establishes a definition for Additionally, modification to lot coverage
assisted living and mutli-family assisted may be allowed through the administrative
living, strikes the definition for retirement site plan review process. The amendment
residences, and amends the definition for also will require graphic treatment of water
convalescent centers. Assisted living will tanks with the an to he reviewed by the
replace retirement residences in the zoning Renton Municipal Arts Commission
use tables. Also, density will be applied Appeals of the environmental detenmination
to assisted living facilities when it has, must be filed in writing on or before 5:00
up till now, not been a consideration in PM on April 28, 2008. Appeals must be
the development of retirement residences. filed in writing together with the required
Due the small unit size and fewer bedroom $75-00 application fee with: Hearing
unit mix assisted living will be allowed to Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South
develop with a bonus ratio of one and one- Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals
half times the base density. In the R-I and to the Examiner are governed by City of
R-10 the absolute maximum number of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13.
living units will be eighteen with no further Additional information regarding the appeal
bonus, previously in the R-I a retiiLmcnt process may be obtained front the Renton
residence would not have been limiiedinthe City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
numberofliving units it developed with. the Published in the Renton Reporter on April
only limitation had been the percent of lot 12, 2008. #67006.
coverage. Finally, assisted living facilities
will be required to provide parking at a ratio
of one space per living unit plus dedicated
parking for facility fleet vehicles.
Linda M. Mills
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter ' '� 1oN`......
Subscribed and sworn to me this 16th day of April, 2008. .f-��� o�}
�s r
- - z -
t,
111411 �`` = o
in CovDgto , WashingtonPublic f e ate of Washington, Residing�/,,�,9ToF�tVV A��'?`
P. Q. Number: 1111+i�rr\ \\1
• NO�'
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Assisted Living and Maximum Height Requirement for lNiblies In Residential Zones
Amendments
PROJECT NUMBER: LILA OB-021, ECF
LOCATION-, Citywide
DESCRIPTION: Assisted Living', The amendment establishes a definition for assisted living and mutlF
family assisted living, strikes the definition for retirement residences, and amends the
definition in, convalescent centers. Assisted living will replace retirement residences In
the zoning use tables. Also, density will be applied to assisted living facilities when it
has, up till now, riot been a consideration in the development of retirement residences.
Due the small unit size and fewer bedroom unit mix assisted living will be allowed to
develop with a bonus ratio of one and —half times the base density. In the R-1 and R-
io the absoVute maximum number of living units will be eighteen with no further bonus.
Previously in the R-1 a retirement residence would not have been limited in the number
of living units it developed with, the only limitation had been the percent of lot coverage.
Finally, assisted living facilities will be required to provide parking at a ratio of one space
per living a nit plus dedi cated parking for facility fleet ve hic lea.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: The amendment is to
Increase thin maximum height for public water facilities. The proposed height for
aboveground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility facilities Is: 175 feet for
aboveground standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water lank, and 50 feet maximum
height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations. Also
additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump stations would be allowed
through the admin islrative site plan review process. Additionally, modification to lot
coverage may be allowed through the administrative site plan review process. The
amendment also will ruqulre graphic treatment of water tanks with the an to be reviewed
by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT
THE PROPOSED ACTION OOPS NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be tiled in writing an or before 5r00 p.m. on April 28, 2008,
Appeals must be tiled in writing together with the required $75.09 appiicanon fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98957. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-0-11O.S. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Oftice.425.430.6511h.
IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DE T ERMINATION IS APPEALED, A P1161-iC HEARWG WILL BE SET AND
ALL PARTIES NOTIFIE➢.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,.
STRATEGIC PLANNING DIVISION AT 425.430 6576.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification.
CERTIFICATION
I, i , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document
were posted by me in-3--conspicuous places or nearby the described property on �%xWtilt.
DATE:_ % -2'"fb
SIGNED:
ATTEST: Subscribed and swam before me, a Notary Public, in and for the St
on die. ,� � day ofQ
t
I,.
CITY OF RENTON
LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 8111 day of April, 2008, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing Agency Letter and Signature Sheet documents. This information was sent to:
Agencies I See Attached
(Signature of Sender):
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Judith Subia signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the
instrument.
Notary (Print):
My appointment expires:
Assisted Living & Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
::fly
LUA08-021, ECF
template - affidavit of service by mailing
.N
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERG DETERMINATIONS)
Dept. of Ecology
WDFW - Larry Fisher
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.
Environmental Review Section
1775 12"' Ave NW, Ste 201
Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
PO Sox 47703
Issaquah, WA 98027
39015 172"d Avenue SE
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Auburn, WA 98092
WSDOT Northwest Region
Duwamish Tribal Office
Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
4717 W Marginal Way SW
Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
39015 172"d Avenue SE
PO Box 330310
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers
KC Wastewater Treatment Division
Office of Archaeology & Historic
Seattle District Office
Environmental Planning - OAP
Preservation
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
201 S. Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-0505
Attn: Stephanie Kramer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
PO Box 48343
Seattle, WA 98124
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Boyd Powers
Dept. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Serv.
City of Newcastle
City of Kent
Attn: SEPA Section
Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson
Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Director of Community Development
220 Fourth Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055-1219
13020 SE 72"d Place
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Newcastle, WA 98059
Metro Transit
Puget Sound Energy
City of Tukwila
Gary Kriedt, Senior Environmental Planner
Joe Jainga, Municipal Liason Manager
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
201 South Jackson Street, KSC-TR-0431
PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle Public Utilities
State Department of Ecology
Real Estate Services
NW Regional Office
Title Examiner
3190 1601" Avenue SE
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
template- affidavit of service by mailing
CITY
' "U7_4L-Denis
Law, Mayor
April 8, 2008
Washington State Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Subject: Environmental Determinations
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the
Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 8, 2008:
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
PROJECT NAME_ : Assisted Living and Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in 'Residential
Zones. Amendments
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA 08-021, ECF
LOCATION: Citywide .
DESCRIPTION: Assisted Living: The amendment establishes a' definition for assisted living and
muth-family assisted living; strikes the definition for retirement residences,' and
amends the definition for convalescent centers. Assisted living will replace
retirement residences in the zoning use tables. Also, density will.be applied to
assisted living facilities when it has, up till now,not been a consideration in the
development of retirement residences. Due the small, unit size and fewer bedroom
unit mix assisted living will be allowed' to develop with a bonus ratio of one and `one-
half times the base density: In the R-Land R-10 the absolute maximum number'of
.. living units will be eighteen with no further bonus. Previously in.: the R-1 a
retirement residence would not have been limited in the number of. living units it
developed with, the only limitation had been the percent oflot coverage: Finally,
assisted living facilities will be required to .provide parking at A. ratio of one space
per living unit plus dedicated parking for facility fleet vehicles.
Maxiiinum,Heigbt Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: The amendment
is.to. increase the maximum height.for public water facilities. The proposed height
for aboveground and elevated water reservoirs and public. utility facilities is: 17.5
feet for aboveground standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank; and 50 feet.
.maximum height for water facilities,: such as water treatment facilities, and pump
stations: Also additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump stations
would be allowed through the administrative site plan review process. Additionally,
modification to lot coverage maybe. allowed -through "the administrative site plan.
review process. The amendment also will require graphic treatment of water tanks
with the art to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission.
Appeals of the: environmental- determination must be filed in writing on or. before 5:00 p.m. on
April 28, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:
Hearing. Examiner., City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, .Renton, WA 98057. .Appeals to the
Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code. Section 4-8-1103. Additionalinformation
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425). 439-6510..
1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057 R E 1 1 1 0 k ' .
ihispaper contains 50% recycled rnMdal, 3on 0%postosunier - AHEAD d F T FI E CURVE _
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA08-021, ECF
APPLICANT; City of Renton
PROJECT NAME: Assisted Living & Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
OF PROPOSAL: Assisted Living: The amendment establishes a definition for assisted living and
muth-family assisted living, strikes the definition for retirement residences, and amends the definition for convalescent
centers. Assisted living will replace retirement residences in the zoning use tables. Also, density will be applied to
assisted living facilities when it has, up till now, not been a consideration in the development of retirement residences.
Due the small unit size and fewer bedroom unit mix assisted living will be allowed to develop with a bonus ratio of one and
one-half times the base density. In the R-1 and R-10 the absolute maximum number of living units will be eighteen with
no further bonus. Previously in the R-1 a retirement residence would not have been limited in the number of living units it
developed with, the only limitation had been the percent of lot coverage. Finally, assisted living facilities will be required to
provide parking at a ratio of one space per living unit plus dedicated parking for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: The amendment is to increase the maximum height for
public water facilities. The proposed height for aboveground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility facilities is:
175 feet for aboveground standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, and 50 feet maximum height for water
facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations. Also additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and
pump stations would be allowed through the administrative site plan review process. Additionally, modification to lot
coverage may be allowed through the administrative site plan review process. The amendment also will require graphic
treatment of water tanks with the art to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
Location: Citywide
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
This Determination of Non -Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be
involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 28, 2008.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code
Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's
Office, (425) 430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
April 12, 2008
DATE OF DECISION:
April 7, 2008
SIGNATURES:
•t
4M"vn
q
ell? /08—
a
I. David Daniels, Fire Chief
to
Public Work
Fire Department
__� _P___
N A
Te Higashiyama, Administrator
Date
ex iets, , A imstrator
to
Community Services
Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEETING NOTICE
April 7, 2008
To:
Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
I. David Daniels, Fire Chief
Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator
From:
Jennifer Henning, CED Planning Manager
Meeting Date:
Monday, April 7, 2008
Time:
3:00 PM
Location:
Sixth Floor Conference Room #620
Agenda listed below.
THE FOLLOWING IS A CONSENT AGENDA
Assisted Livina & Maximum Height Re uirement for Utilities in Residential Zones Mathias
LUA08-021, ECF
Location: Citywide. Description: Assisted Living: The amendment establishes a definition for assisted living and
mutli-family assisted living, strikes the definition for retirement residences, and amends the definition for
convalescent centers. Assisted living will replace retirement residences in the zoning use tables. Also, density will
be applied to assisted living facilities when it has, up till now, not been a consideration in the development of
retirement residences. Due the small unit size and fewer bedroom unit mix assisted living will be allowed to develop
with a bonus ratio of one and one-half times the base density. In the R-1 and R-10 the absolute maximum number of
living units will be eighteen with no further bonus. Previously in the R-1 a retirement residence would not have been
limited in the number of living units it developed with, the only limitation had been the percent of lot coverage.
Finally, assisted living facilities will be required to provide parking at a ratio of one space per living unit plus
dedicated parking for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: The amendment is to increase the maximum height
for public water facilities. The proposed height for aboveground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility
facilities is: 75 feet for aboveground standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, and 50 feet maximum height
for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations. Also additional setbacks for water
treatment facilities and pump stations would be allowed through the administrative site plan review process.
Additionally, modification to lot coverage may be allowed through the administrative site plan review process. The
amendment also will require graphic treatment of water tanks with the art to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal
Arts Commission.
cc: D. Law, Mayor
J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
S. Dale Estey, CED Director®
D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall
N. Watts, Development Services Director
F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
C. Duffy, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal @
J. Medzegian, Council
P, Hahn, Transportation Systems Director
R. Lind, CED Planning Manager
L. Warren, City Attorney
ERC City of Renton
REPORT Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
ER C MEE TING DA TE:
April 7, 2008
Project Name:
Assisted Living & Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
Owner:
n/a
Applicant:
City of Renton
Contact:
City of Renton, EDNSP
File Number:
LUA 08-021, ECF
Project Manager:
Angie Mathias, Associate Planner
Project Summary:
Assisted Living: The amendment establishes a definition for assisted living and
mutli-family assisted living, strikes the definition for retirement residences, and
amends the definition for convalescent centers. Assisted living will replace
retirement residences in the zoning use tables. Also, density will be applied to
assisted living facilities when it has, up till now, not been a consideration in the
development of retirement residences. Due the small unit size and fewer bedroom
unit mix assisted living will be allowed to develop with a bonus ratio of one and
one-half times the base density. In the R-1 and R-10 the absolute maximum
number of living units will be eighteen with no further bonus. Previously in the R-
1 a retirement residence would not have been limited in the number of living units
it developed with, the only limitation had been the percent of lot coverage. Finally,
assisted living facilities will be required to provide parking at a ratio of one space
per living unit plus dedicated parking for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: The amendment
is to increase the maximum height for public water facilities. The proposed height
for aboveground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility facilities is: 75 feet
for aboveground standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, and 50 feet
maximum height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump
stations. Also additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump stations
would be allowed through the administrative site plan review process.
Additionally, modification to lot coverage may be allowed through the
administrative site plan review process. The amendment also will require graphic
treatment of water tanks with the art to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts
Commission
Project Location: Citywide
Exist. Bldg. Area SF: n/a Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): n/a
Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): n/a
Site Area: n/a Total Building Area GSF: n/a
STAFF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a
RECOMMENDATION: Determination of Non -Significance (DNS),
ERC Report 08-021.doe
City of Renton PIMP Department
ASSISTED LIVING & MAXIML
Report of April 7, 2008
EIGHT
PART ONE: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
En-4-onmental Review Committee Report
_ L UA 08-021, ECF
Page 2 of 2
In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project
impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations.
A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials:
Issue a DNS with a 14-day Appeal Period.
B. Mitigation Measures
1. None required for this non -project action.
C. Exhibits
NIA
D. Environmental Impacts
The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether
the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in
conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal has no
probable impacts.
E. Comments of Reviewing Departments
The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their
comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant."
Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this
report.
Environmental Determination Anneal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed
in writing on or before 5:00 PM, April 28, 2008.
Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-1103 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in
writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the
appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way,
Renton WA 98057.
ADVISORYNOTES TO APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land
use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for
the land use actions.
None
ERC Report 08-021.doc
�l
1 r i E F 1 JASHIN13TON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNi I"', ' RADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
128. 10- Avenue SW • PO Box = >� T J °rr)pM. WashinUton 98504.2,25 r (360) 7254000
March 25, 2008
Alex Pietsch
Economic Development Director
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98055
Dear Mr. Pietsch:
Thank you for sending the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development
(CTED) the following materials as required under RCW 36.70A.106. Please keep this letter as documentation
that you have met this procedural requirement.
City of Renton - Proposed ordinance amending Chapter 4-2, zoning districts -uses and standards, of
Title IV of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code" of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" to amend the
regulations regarding assisted living. These materials were received on 03124/2008 and processed
with the Material ID # 12788.
We have forwarded a copy of this notice to other state agencies. If this is a draft amendment, adopted
amendments should be sent to CTED within ten days of adoption and to any other state agencies who
commented on the draft.
If you have any questions, please call me at (360) 725-3063.
Sincerely,
Sam Wentz
GIS Coordinator
Growth Management Services
Enclosure
STr►v � AGENCIES REVIEWING DEV REG.-
Revised February 2008
Cities and counties need to send electronic copies of their draft development regulations to the
Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED), GMS Review
Team, reviewteam(dcted.wa.Qov, at least 60 days prior to adoption (See, RCW 36.70A.106). If a
jurisdiction only has hard copies available, it should mail a copy to each of the state agencies'
representatives listed below, at least 60 days prior to adoption. Adopted amendments, including the final
ordinance or resolution, should be sent to CTED, either by standard mail or E-mail, immediately upon
publication, as well as to any state agencies that commented on the draft regulations. A jurisdiction does
not need to send its development regulation amendments to those agencies that have been called first
and indicated the amendments will not be reviewed. The jurisdiction should keep a record of these
contacts with state agencies and the agencies' responses.
Review Team
CTED
Growth Management Services
Post Office Box 42525
Olympia, Washington 98504-2525
(360) 725-3000 Fax: (360) 753-2950
E-mail: reviewteam(d)-cted.wa.Qov
Jennifer Hayes
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Post Office Box 43155
Olympia, Washington 98504-3155
(360) 902-2562 Fax: (360) 902-2946
E-mail: haesjih(aidfw.wa.�ov
SEPAIGMA Coordinator
Department of Ecology
Post Office Box 47600
Olympia, Washington 98504-7600
(360) 407-6960 Fax: (360) 407-6904
E-mail: amacoordination(a-_)ecy.wa.gov
Elizabeth McNagny
Department of Social and Health Services
Post Office Box 45848
Olympia, Washington 98504-5848
(360) 902-8164 Fax: (360) 902-7889
E-mail: mcnagec@dshs.wa.yov
Bill Wiebe
Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 47300
Olympia, Washington 98504-7370
(360) 705-7965 Fax: (360) 705-6813
E-mail: wiebebCa wsdot.wa.Qov
Eric Heinitz
Department of Corrections
Post Office Box 41112
Olympia, Washington 98504-1112
(360) 725-8397 Fax: (360) 586-8723
E-mail: efheinitzCddoc1.wa.gov
Kelly Cooper
Department of Health
Environmental Health Division
Post Office Box 47820
Olympia, Washington 98504-7820
(360) 236-3012 Fax: (360) 236-2250
E-mail: Kelly,cooper(&-doh.wa.Qov
Hugo Flores
Washington State Dept of Natural Resources
GMA/SMA Planning & State Harbor Areas
111 Washington St SE
PO Box 47027
Olympia, WA 98504-7027
(360) 902-1126 Fax: (360) 902-1786
E-mail: hUQo.flores(@dnr.wa.aov
Cullen Stephenson
Puget Sound Partnership
Post Office Box 40900
Olympia, Washington 98504-0900
(360) 725-5470 Fax: (360) 725-5456
E-mail: cullen.stephenson(@psp.wa.gov
Greg Griffith
Department of Archaeology & Historic
Preservation
Post Office Box 48343
Olympia, Washington 98504-8343
(360) 586-3073 Fax: (360) 586-3067
E-mail: ureQ.Qriffith5_dahp.wa.gov
S:IGmu\ADMINILists\State Agencies Reviewing Dev Regs 2-08.doc
i
CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 24th day of
March, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time for a public hearing to be held in the
seventh floor Council Chambers of Renton City Hall, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA
98057, to consider the following:
Amendments to Renton Municipal Code - Title IV Docket Items:
Commercial Office Residential (COR), Assisted Living,
Helipad, and Utilities Height zoning text amendments.
All interested parties are invited to attend the hearing and present written or oral
comments regarding the proposal. Renton City Hall is in compliance with the American
Disabilities Act, and interpretive services for the hearing impaired will be provided upon
prior notice. For information, call 425-430-6510.
/
Bonnie 1. Walton
City Clerk
Published Renton Reporter
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Account No. 50640
3/13/2008 - Notice sent to 37 Parties of Record per attached labels.
Jason Seth
cc: Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager
k
Mark Hancock Joan and Tom Rosling Mike Vowels
PO Box 88811 1023 N 34th Street 12717 322nd Ave NE
Seattle, WA 98138 Renton, WA 98056 Duvall, WA 98019
Roger & Marlene Winter
2731 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Jim & Laura Morgan
3103 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Thomas Dahlby
3213 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Charles F. Conner
3001 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Monica Fix
3007 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Eugene Heurchel
14408 149th P1 SE
Renton, WA 98059
David Tryc
3411 Meadow Ave N
Renton, WA 98056
Marc Pritchard
2807 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Steve & Marcie Maxwell
PO Box 2048
Renton, WA 98056
Bill & Debra Keppler
2805 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Lisa Dahlby
3217 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Buzz & Pat Dana
5219 Ripley Lane N
Renton, WA 98056
Jerry Brennan
3405 Lake Washington Blvd N
Renton, WA 98056
Randy & Linda Ritualo
701 N 30th St
Renton, WA 98056
Mike O'Leary
800 W Perimeter Rd #A
Renton, WA 98057
Laurey CaroIus
14502 Wallingford Avenue N
Seattle, WA 98133
Martin & Pegi Galster
2907 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Marleen Mandt
1408 N 26th St
Renton, WA. 98056
John Hempelmann
524 Second Ave Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98104-2323
Peter Spouse & Kelly Grace
3011 Mountain View Avenue N
Renton, WA 98056
Neal Shinery
1705 147th PI SE
Bellevue, WA 98007
Greg & Karen Krape
1101 N 27th PI
Renton, WA 98056
Sharon Smith
5143 Ripley Lane N
Renton, WA 98056
Inez Somerville Petersen
1166 Ede] Court
Enumclaw, WA 98022
Kim Skaar John Middlebrooks Karen Walter-Muckleshoot Indian
PO Box 2945 510 Seneca Ave NW Tribe Fisheries Division
Chelan, WA 98816 Renton, WA 98057 39015 172nd Ave SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Ann & Bernie Moskowitz David Halinen Don Merlino
8251 South 121st Street Halinen I,aw Offices Stoneway Concrete
Seattle. WA 98178 1019 Regents Blvd, Ste 202 9216 Sth Ave S
Fir Crest, WA 98466 Seattle, WA 98108
Michael Merlino
Stoneway Concrete
9216 8th Ave S
Seattle, WA 98108
Bradley Karvasek
Equity Residential
16400 Southcenter Parkway,
Ste 301
Tukwila, WA 98188
Jim Hamhuechen
Prudential NW Realty
200 112th Ave NE, Ste 200
Bellevue, WA 98004
Joseph Ho
Prudential NW Realty
200 112th Ave NE, Ste 200
Bellevue, WA 98004
City ofRen[on Department of Community & Economic Deve.__ient
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:I"
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 02 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-021, ECF
DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 19, 2008
APPLICANT: City of Renton
PROJECT MANAGER: Angle Mathias
PROJECT TITLE: 2007 Docket: Assisted Living & Maximum
Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
000
PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO
JUDITH SUBIA IN DICED, FLOOR SIX
SITE AREA: Citywide, IS•
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed changes include:
Assisted Living: This proposal will have multiple code amendments addressing assisted living facilities. Proposed amendments include: New
definitions for assisted living as a land use and assisted living as a type of multifamily. The multi -family definition allows kitchens in units and the land
use definition indicates that the staff administers an element of personal care to residents. Also, to strike the definition for retirement residences;
Revise the definition for convalescent centers so that the distinction between assisted living and convalescent is clear and identifies that a skilled
nursing staff administers convalescent care; Apply density standards to assisted living facilities, but allow them to develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per the
base density of the zone; Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone. Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18
total residential units per acre; Include assisted living the parking standards table and require 1 parking space per residential unit of assisted living,
plus dedicated parking spaces for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal addresses the maximum height for essential public utility facilities within
residential zones, required setbacks for such facilities, and neighborhood compatibility of facilities above fifty (50) feet_ The proposal will have multiple
code amendments to include: The proposed height for above ground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility is: 175 feet for above ground
standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, a water treatment facility to the highest point of the water storage reservoir and 50 feet maximum
height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations; Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump
stations through the administrative site plan review process; Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan review process;
Require graphic treatment of water tanks. This public art is to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Mirror
impacts
Probable
Major
impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
water
Plants
Land/Shorelirre Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energyl
Natural Resources
N-a
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Li htlGlare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14.000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have ide ifred areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposaf,
nl ._ () ..0
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Date
City of Re..._n Department of Community & Economic Dev , ment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 02, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-021, ECF
DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 19, 2008 01TYOFRENION
APPLICANT: City of Renton
PROJECT MANAGER: Angie Mathias
PROJECT TITLE: 2007 Docket: Assisted Living & Maximum
Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
MAR 21 4 20
PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET Ta
nxl
JUDITH SUBIA IN DCED,iF�Ii.O 'Wgiv
SITE AREA: Ci ide
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed changes include:
Assisted Living: This proposal will have multiple code amendments addressing assisted living facilities. Proposed amendments include: New
definitions for assisted living as a land use and assisted living as a type of multifamily. The multi -family definition allows kitchens in units and the land
use definition indicates that the staff administers an element of personal care to residents. Also, to strike the definition for retirement residences;
Revise the definition for convalescent centers so that the distinction between assisted living and convalescent is clear and identifies that a skilled
nursing staff administers convalescent care; Apply density standards to assisted living facilities, but allow them to develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per the
base density of the zone; Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone. Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18
total residential units per acre; Include assisted living the parking standards table and require 1 parking space per residential unit of assisted living,
plus dedicated parking spaces for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal addresses the maximum height for essential public utility facilities within
residential zones, required setbacks for such facilities, and neighborhood compatibility of facilities above fifty (50) feet. The proposal will have multiple
code amendments to include: The proposed height for above ground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility is: 175 feet for above ground
standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, a water treatment facility to the highest point of the water storage reservoir and 50 feet maximum
height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations; Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump
stations through the administrative site plan review process; Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan review process;
Require graphic treatment of water tanks. This public art is to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Lan&'Shorefine Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
tAO06
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
Now-e
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
IMF
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Light/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
HistoncJCultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Sig at of Director or Authorized Representative Da
City of Re,,.. n Department of Community & Economic Dev . , ment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: FobCOMMENTS
DUE: APRIL 02, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-021, ECP
DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 19, 2008
APPLICANT: City of Renton
PROJECT MANAGER: Angie Mathias
PROJECT TITLE: 2007 Docket: Assisted Living & Maximum
Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO
JUDITH SUBIA IN DGED, FLOOR SIX
SITE AREA: Citywide
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed changes include:
Assisted Living: This proposal will have multiple code amendments addressing assisted living facilities. Proposed amendments include: New
definitions for assisted living as a land use and assisted living as a type of multifamily. The multi -family definition allows kitchens in units and the land
use definition indicates that the staff administers an element of personal care to residents. Also, to strike the definition for retirement residences;
Revise the definition for convalescent centers so that the distinction between assisted living and convalescent is clear and identifies that a skilled
nursing staff administers convalescent care; Apply density standards to assisted living facilities, but allow them to develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per the
base density of the zone; Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone. Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18
total residential units per acre; Include assisted living the parking standards table and require 1 parking space per residential unit of assisted living,
plus dedicated parking spaces for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal addresses the maximum height for essential public utility facilities within
residential zones, required setbacks for such facilities, and neighborhood compatibility of facilities above fifty (50) feet. The proposal will have multiple
code amendments to include: The proposed height for above ground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility is:175 feet for above ground
standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, a water treatment facility to the highest point of the water storage reservoir and 50 feet maximum
height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations; Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump
stations through the administrative site plan review process; Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan review process;
Require graphic treatment of water tanks_ This public art is to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shorellne Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housing_
Aesthetics
Li hUGlare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
HistorirXultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10. 000 Feet
14, 000 Feet
i _a iliac_ bae .c} f'L_' r- �S_ 1/7 4,,64X 9Ady0J C"^-a A_IE�,Ps_
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Ala 0 "-a-,
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properI assess this proposal.
Lam/ u 3 Lzq LE
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City of Re...—n Department of Community & Economic Dev_ __ment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 02, 2008
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-021, ECF
DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 19, 2008
APPLICANT: City of Renton
PROJECT MANAGER: Angle Mathias
PROJECT TITLE: 2007 Docket: Assisted Living & Maximum
Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO
JUDITH SUBIA IN DCED, FLOOR SIX
SITE AREA: Citywide
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed changes include:
Assisted Living: This proposal will have multiple code amendments addressing assisted living facilities. Proposed amendments include: New
definitions for assisted living as a land use and assisted living as a type of multifamily. The multi -family definition allows kitchens in units and the land
use definition indicates that the staff administers an element of personal care to residents. Also, to strike the definition for retirement residences;
Revise the definition for convalescent centers so that the distinction between assisted living and convalescent is clear and identifies that a skilled
nursing staff administers convalescent care; Apply density standards to assisted living facilities, but allow them to develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per the
base density of the zone; Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone. Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18
total residential units per acre; Include assisted living the parking standards table and require 1 parking space per residential unit of assisted living,
plus dedicated parking spaces for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal addresses the maximum height for essential public utility facilities within
residential zones, required setbacks for such facilities, and neighborhood compatibility of facilities above fifty (50) feet. The proposal will have multiple
code amendments to include: The proposed height for above ground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility is: 175 feet for above ground
standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, a water treatment facility to the highest point of the water storage reservoir and 50 feet maximum
height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations; Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump
stations through the administrative site plan review process; Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan review process;
Require graphic treatment of water tanks. This public art is to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Li htfGlare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Histonc/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14, 000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Sicinatur o irector or Ai5thorized Representative Date
City of Re..._n Department of Community & Economic Devt,. ,I-ment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:
COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 02, 2008 CITY OFRENION
APPLICATION NO: LUA08-021, ECF
DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 19, 2008
APPLICANT: City of Renton
PROJECT MANAGER: Angie Mathias mAg 13
PROJECT TITLE: 2007 Docket: Assisted Living & Maximum
Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
PLEASE RETURN REVIEWNggf-WISION
JUDITH SUBIA IN DCED, FLOOR SIX
SITE AREA: Citywide
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed changes include:
Assisted Living: This proposal will have multiple code amendments addressing assisted living facilities. Proposed amendments include; New
definitions for assisted living as a land use and assisted living as a type of multifamily. The multi -family definition allows kitchens in units and the land
use definition indicates that the staff administers an element of personal care to residents. Also, to strike the definition for retirement residences;
Revise the definition for convalescent centers so that the distinction between assisted living and convalescent is clear and identifies that a skilled
nursing staff administers convalescent care; Apply density standards to assisted living facilities, but allow them to develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per the
base density of the zone; Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone. Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18
total residential units per acre; Include assisted living the parking standards table and require 1 parking space per residential unit of assisted living,
plus dedicated parking spaces for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal addresses the maximum height for essential public utility facilities within
residential zones, required setbacks for such facilities, and neighborhood compatibility of facilities above fifty (50) feet. The proposal will have multiple
code amendments to include: The proposed height for above ground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility is: 175 feet for above ground
standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, a water treatment facility to the highest point of the water storage reservoir and 50 feet maximum
height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations; Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump
stations through the administrative site plan review process; Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan review process;
Require graphic treatment of water tanks. This public art is to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
Impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
LandrShoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
AIL I A) 6'
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
A)L)"
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
/t)gw
Element of the
Environment
Probable
Minor
impacts
Probable
Major
Impacts
More
Information
Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Light/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Histonc/Culturat
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
f4,000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas io which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal.
Sign ur of I7lrect6t or Au ri a Representative Date
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED
' Y t DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DATE: March 191
LAND USE NUMBER and APPLICATION NAME: LUA08-021. EGF Assisted Living (Docket P06-20) and Maximum Height
Requirements lot Utilities in Residential Zones {Docket i07-01 i
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTIONS: Two {:rnarsetl c ,ges, both of which are Citywide, Proposed changes include'
Assistetl Llvino. This proposal will have ntu Hula cede ,merd-cri addressing assisted living facilities. Proposed amanchini
Include,
• New definiii ns bur assisted living as o ale use and assisted Nino as a type V mull,tarrily. The multi-lamily dellnition ailows
kitchens it units and the land use :10,tior io;tioatea that the staff administers an element of personal are to residents
Also, :c sulk. the definkien for retirement teside
• Revise the delinition far convalescarl cerer_ so :ha: the distinction between assisled living and convalescent is clear and
identifies that ask'
nursing stair nursstair ad:mms:ers cen�olescen: -are
• Apply density standards to assisted III I— Iitaro:+lnamto develop el a ratio cl l burins par the base density of
The zone_
• Altow assisted living facilities n It A 1- ccne. Lb-C assisted ('ring faeififies in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18
total residential units per acre.
• Include assisted living the parking s:antlatds tab a any recite:=_ 1 parking space per residential unit of assisted living, plus
dedicated parking spaces for facility 11-s:: eh clan.
Maximum Heiehl Ratluiramel]S f2r U.i111es n =irlit an-Izl Cones: ! �`�is proposal addresses the maximum height for essential public;
atilhy facilities within residential zones, raquwed san:ao, a, faoilhies, and neighborhood compatibility of facilities above Ill
feel r.505 The proposal will have muniple code amend -,eats to Include:
• The proposed height lac above grounc and eli,valod vane, tcscrveirs antl public ulilhy �s
175 1 1'or above ground star 1pe water reservoir .,n elevated water lank, a wale, lreatmenl tastily to Iha highest
p"rd c'thvoir e water sfmage reser_
• 50 feet maximum height lot waicr lac:lihes, snCh as rreler :realment tadlities, and pump staM1ons
• ANow add'uional setbacks lot water trim lilciriu,an,ip.,mo stations through the administrative are plan review process.
• Allow rr•odllication to lot coverage thmuch:hc ad --I s le plan review process.
• Require graphic neaoneni of water :ants. This p,.L,c ac is :c aa reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NOWSIGNIFICANCE !ONS): As the Lead Agency. the Cty of Renton has determined that
stgnillcant environmental impacts are lu,hlkely :o result 'yarn Pre uroposed Comprehensive Plen amerdmenis and zoning changes.
Therefore, as permeed under the RCW 43.2r� 11c. the Gi:; ai Pcmmn is using the OpOonal DNS process 4 give notice that a
DNS is likely to be issued. Commenl peo 4cii the prrlec: any J,e proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period.
There will be no comment poled lollowlnh IFc i of me T',reshold Detemlina:Ion of Non -Significance IDNS), A 14-day
appeal period will lots. the issuance of Ihy -,NG
APPLICATION DATE: March 12, 2008.
PermitslRev Raouested. Ervi:anmental SEP,A neriuw Zoi -ext Amendn.errt,
Lecalion where application may be mviewcd: Ccpus-c-: oI Gen murity 8 Ecis or,c Deyelopmen;, Strategic Planning SocOan.
10655oul, Grady Way. Pell— INA 9895-
PUBLIC HEARING: A public hi on Hes us oil he haul h,]ara till City Coo ! on March 2c, 2nos_
Environmental Documents that evaluate the Proposed Project: Chsckltsl dated 11 12. 2008.
Deveiapmem Regulations used For Project Mitigation These ,I r-projacl aclmns will be suL}ecl to Iha City's SCPA Ordinarga
and Development Regulations and other apr.1 _Iu cedes and re.wlalions as appropriate,
Proposed Milgation Measures: The . w lys s el the proposa dries not reveal any adveae ervironmental Impacts requiring
mil gation above and beya,d exiafirg entYa,I, :,.r,,.. H! wnvar_ I iligation may be neoessary and may ixa unposed al the fime of
a sne-speedy; development proposal on In .,Inj^cl sne
romiri or the above appl icalinr a nxt t:e _�, rhm 1t_+.:: ri i"ij Angie M8lhias, Asangiaie Planner. ❑apartment of Community
and Ecororric Dcvelopmem, 1 A South Grad; t is Rarn_n. 11 98657, by 5.00 p.m. on April 2, 2008. If you have questions
about :his proposal. or mist, to be made a p ,r:y r.1 reccrd a- d er.'e additional notiWation by mail. contact the Project Manager.
An9one who submits written ccmmy mes 1 a.h..c., i ron a�ca.l: cpar.}• of record and will be notified el any decision on this
project.
CONTACT PERSON; Angie MathlaS (425) 430- 6576
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
ll you —o.d 1111. ,ecwiva lurther inlorma:tan :,I 1 - r,'aI review of this p:Jposed project. eornplete this lorm and return
10:City of Renton, Depanment of Common;, 5 Eel la
ic C.1•e npl, aril, 1055 South Grady Way, Ramon. WA UB067_ You must
return fhls form to receive fulure reformation regarding the environmental determinaliort ter this proli
File No.'Nar. e: LUA08.021, ECF Assisted Living (Docket a06.28) and Maximum Neighl Requlremems for Utilities in
Residential Zones (Docket A07-01 )
NAME
ACIE RI
TELEPHpNE N'0..
CERTIFICATION
hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document
were posted by nee in conspicuous places or nearby the described property
DATE: 20 0 SIGNED:
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in
)PCB P p on the. D 4 day of
SIGMA
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 19th day of March, 2008, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope
containing NOA and Environmental Checklist documents. This information was sent to:
Agencies See Attached
(Signature of
STATE OF WASHINGTON }
} SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Judith Subia signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the
instrument.
I }
Dated:3
Notary Pub ie in and for tAd Sate of Wa4hirigioh.
Notary (Print): tvtC(F-r
My appointment expires: l D
Assisted Living and Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
LUA08-021, ECF
template - affidavit of service by mailing
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
Dept. of Ecology'
WDFW - Larry Fisher'
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.
Environmental Review Section
1775 12" Ave NW, Ste 201
Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
PO Box 47703
Issaquah, WA 98027
39015 172°d Avenue SE
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Auburn, WA 98092
WSDOT Northwest Region *
Duwamish Tribal Office *
Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
4717 W Marginal Way SW
Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
39015 172"a Avenue SE
PO Box 330310
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers *
KC Wastewater Treatment Division *
Office of Archaeology & Historic
Seattle District Office
Environmental Planning Supervisor
Preservation*
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
Ms. Shirley Marroquin
Attn: Stephanie Kramer
PO Box C-3755
201 S. Jackson St, MS KSG-NR-050
PO Box 48343
Seattle, WA 98124
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Boyd Powers
Dept. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Serv.
City of Newcastle
City of Kent
Attn: SEPA Section
Attn: Mr_ Micheal E. Nicholson
Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Director of Community Development
220 Fourth Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055-1219
13020 SE 72nd Place
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Newcastle, WA 98059
Metro Transit
Puget Sound Energy
City of Tukwila
Gary Kriedt, Senior Environmental Planner
Joe Jainga, Municipal Liason Manager
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
201 South Jackson Street, KSC-TR-0431
PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle Public Utilities
State Department of Ecology
Rea! Estate Services
Title Examiner
NW Regional Office
3190 160'r' Avenue 5E
th,�
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and
cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application.
template - affidavit of service by mailing
V NOT -'OF APPLICATION AND IOPOSED
+7_R DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
'N`�
DATE: March 19, 2008
LAND USE NUMBER and APPLICATION NAME: LUA08-021, ECF Assisted Living (Docket #06-28) and Maximum Height
Requirements for Utilities in Residential Zones (Docket #07-01)
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTIONS: Two proposed changes, both of which are Citywide. Proposed changes include:
Assisted Living: This proposal will have multiple code amendments addressing assisted living facilities. Proposed amendments
include:
• New definitions for assisted living as a land use and assisted living as a type of multifamily. The multi -family definition allows
kitchens in units and the land use definition indicates that the staff administers an element of personal care to residents.
Also, to strike the definition for retirement residences.
• Revise the definition for convalescent centers so that the distinction between assisted living and convalescent is clear and
identifies that a skilled nursing staff administers convalescent care.
• Apply density standards to assisted living facilities, but allow them to develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per the base density of
the zone.
• Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone. Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18
total residential units per acre.
• Include assisted living the parking standards table and require 1 parking space per residential unit of assisted living, plus
dedicated parking spaces for facility fleet vehicles.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal addresses the maximum height for essential public
utility facilities within residential zones, required setbacks for such facilities, and neighborhood compatibility of facilities above fifty
feet (50'). The proposal will have multiple code amendments to include:
• The proposed height for above ground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility is:
• 175 feet for above ground standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, a water treatment facility to the highest
point of the water storage reservoir.
• 50 feet maximum height for water facilities. such as water treatment facilities, and pump stations.
• Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump stations through the administrative site plan review process.
• Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan review process.
• Require graphic treatment of water tanks. This public art is to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that
significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and zoning changes.
Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110.. the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a
DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period.
There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). A 14-day
appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS.
APPLICATION DATE: March 12, 2008.
Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Zoning Text Amendment.
Location where application may be reviewed: Department of Community & Economic Development, Strategic Planning Section,
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing on these issues wilt be held before the City Council on March 24, 2008.
Environmental Documents that evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated March 12, 200&.
Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: These non -project actions will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance
and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate.
Proposed Miligation Measures: The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring
mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of
a site -specific development proposal on the subject site.
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Angie Mathias, Associate Planner, Department of Community
and Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 98457, by 5:00 p.m. on April 2, 2008. It you have questions
about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager.
Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this
project.
CONTACT PERSON: Angie Mathias (425) 430- 6576
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
If you would like to receive further information on the environmental review of this proposed project, complete this form and return
to: City of Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. You must
return this form to receive future information regarding the environmental determination for this project.
File No./Name: LUA08-021, ECF Assisted Living (Docket #06-28) and Maximum Height Requirements for Utilities in
Residential Zones (Docket #f07-01)
@►_18i
I'_1717U1 �y1
TELEPHONE NO.:
City of Renton
LAND USE PERMIT
MASTER APPLICAT, �, a z)l x gi'c Planning
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY: ZIP:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME: City of Renton
COMPANY (if applicable). Department of Community &
Economic Development
ADDRESS: 1 055 S. Grady Way
CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6588
CONTACT PERSON
NAME: Rebecca Lind
COMPANY (if applicable): Department of Community &
Economic Development
ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way
CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:
425-430-6588
RHIind@ci.renton.wa.us
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: 2007 Docket- 2
Items: Assisted Living and Maximum Height Requirement for
Utilities in Residential zones
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
Citywide proposals; Zip Codes: 98055, 98056, 98057, 98058,
98059, 98178, and 98042.
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): n/a
EXISTING LAND USE(S): nfa
PROPOSED LAND USE(S): The Assisted Living proposal will
amend the municipal code by replacing the name of the
Retirement Residences Use with Assisted Living. The Assisted
Living Use will be allowed in the same zones where
Retirement Residences were previously allowed. The Assisted
Living Use will additionaly be an allowable use in the R-14
zone.
The proposed amendment for public facilities would allow
water towers and water treatment facilities at greater heights,
modifications to setbacks, and coverage for water facilities.
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
Same
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable): Same
EXISTING ZONING: Same
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Same
SITE AREA (in square feet): n/a
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED
FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING
H:IEDNSP\Title IV1Docket120071Master Application_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement VI.doc 3/12/2008 P.1
PE IECT INFORMA
THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): n/a
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): n/a
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): n/a
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n/a
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n/a
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n!a
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): n/a
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n/a
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): nle
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): n/a
HUN rconth a
PROJECT VALUE: n/a
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): rVa
AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft.
GEOLOGIC HAZARD
HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft.
WETLANDS sq. ft.
SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft.
Approximaterly 6400 ft. of shoreline along the Lake
Washington which is a shoreline of the State.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included
NIA
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. Environmental Checklist 3.
2. 4.
Staff will calculate aRelicable fees and postage: $
77 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Namels) Rebecca Lind , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property
involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Rebecca Lind
(Signatures oof1Owner/Representative)
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
My appointment expires:
H:IEDNSPITitle IV1Docket120071Master Application_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement_Vl.doe 3/12/2008 P.2
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the
quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the
agency identifies impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can
be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,
you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write
"do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For non -project actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in
the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,"
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2007 Docket — Two (2) Items: Assisted Living and Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in
Residential Zones
2. Name of applicant:
City of Renton, Department of Community and Economic Development
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager
(425) 430-6588
1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98055
4. Date checklist prepared:
March 4, 2008
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
NIA
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain.
NIA
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal.
Norte
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
NIA
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
City Council Action to approve code amendments.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site.
There are two proposed land use amendments to the municipal code. These are city-wide
changes versus site specific projects.
WEDNSM1ritle IV0ocket12007%Environmental Checklist_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement_V1.doc 2
1. Assisted Living: This proposal will have multiple code amendments addressing assisted living
facilities. Proposed amendments include:
• New definitions for assisted living as a land use and assisted living as a type of
multifamily. The multi -family definition allows kitchens in units and the land use definition
indicates that the staff administers an element of personal care to residents. Also, to
strike the definition for retirement residences.
• Revise the definition for convalescent centers so that the distinction between assisted
living and convalescent is clear and identifies that a skilled nursing staff administers
convalescent care,
• Apply density standards to assisted living facilities, but allow them to develop at a ratio of
1.5 units per the base density of the zone,
• Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone. Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1
and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18 total residential units per acre.
• Include assisted living the parking standards table and require 1 parking space per
residential unit of assisted living, plus dedicated parking spaces for facility fleet vehicles.
2. Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal addresses the
maximum height for essential public utility facilities within residential zones, required setbacks
for such facilities, and neighborhood compatibility of facilities above fifty (50) feet. The
proposal will have multiple code amendments to:
• The proposed height for aboveground and elevated water reservoirs and public utility is
0 175 feet for aboveground standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, a
water treatment facility to the highest point of the water storage reservoir,
0 50 feet maximum height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities, and
pump stations,
• Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump stations through the
administrative site plan review process,
• Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan review process,
• Require graphic treatment of water tanks,
• Public art to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,
other
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
H:IEDNSPITiOe 1V0ocke1120071Environmenta1 Checklist_Mocket items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement Vi.doc
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile,
odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If
any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. Are there any off -site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
3. WATER
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? if yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
H:IEDNSP\Tltle MDocket120071Environmental Checklist_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement—V9.doc 4
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water
flow into other waters, If so, describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
nla deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
H:IEDNSP\Title MDocket12007%Environmental Check] ist_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement_ l.doc 5
n/a evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
n/a shrubs
nla grass
n/a pasture
n/a crop or grain
n/a wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
nla water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
nla other types of vegetation
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site: Citywide but map and text amendments are non -project actions
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other n/a
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other n/a
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other n/a
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
H:IEDNSPITltle IVIDocket12007%Environmental Checklist_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement_V1.doc 6
in
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
proposal? If so, describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None at this time. At the
time of project specific review, some conditions could potentially be placed on hours of
operation to control noise impacts.
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. Describe any structures on the site.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
WEDNSM"ritle MDock020071Environmental Check Iist_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement V1,doc 7
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Each of the proposals in this non -project action relate to specific zoning classifications in
the city as described below,
Assisted Living: This use will replace Retirement Residences in the zoning use table and
be an allowable use in the same zones where Retirement Residences were. In
addition, the Assisted Living use will be an added use to the R-14 (Residential-14)
zone.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal sets height
requirements for utilities in residential zoning classifications.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action_
Assisted Living: The limitation of eighteen residential units per acre in the R-1 and R-10
zones is intended to ensure the compatibility of assisted living with existing and projected
land uses in those zones. The limitation was determined by assessing other uses allowed
in those zones that are comparable to assisted living. Bed and breakfast facilities are
allowed a maximum of ten guest rooms, staff assumed proprietors would have two
bedrooms and then calculated the number twelve by the 1 q.5 ratio to arrive at a maximum
density of eighteen.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: This proposal addresses
the maximum height for essential public utility facilities within residential zones, required
setbacks for such facilities, and neighborhood compatibility measures.
H:IEDNSPITitle MDocket120071Environmental Check]ist_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement V1.doc 8
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if and Indicate whether high, middle,
or low-income housing.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
Assisted Living: To be determined by zone and at the time of a project specific action. It
is expected that with the density bonus ratio, assisted living will have a higher density and
provide more housing units than typical multi -family projects, but the resulting building for
an assisted living facility would comply with all standards for the zones without variances.
It is unknown what income levels would be accommodated in assisted living facilities.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
Assisted Living: The allowance of additional density for assisted living is intended to still
comply with the development regulations of the applicable zone without variance. A
resulting building is expected to have no different housing impact than other allowed
multi -family buildings.
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
H:IEDNSPITitle MDocket12007Tnvironmental ChecUst_Mocket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement_V1.doc 9
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? if so, generally describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
b. is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
Assisted Living: The parking requirement for assisted living is proposed to be one space
per one residential unit, plus dedicated parking for facility fleet vehicles. The amount of
total parking would be dependent on the total number of living units and the extent of the
fleet the facility elects to operate.
WEDNSPMtle EV%Docket120071Environmental Checkiist_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement Vi.doc 10
Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or
streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation?
If so, generally describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
Not Applicable Non -Project Action. It is expected that assisted living as a land use
generates fewer vehicular trips than typical multi -family developments. Many assisted
living facilities offer group transportation to off -site functions and activities, reducing the
number of single and even two person occupant vehicle trips.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
Assisted Living: It is expected that assisted living facilities will result in a need for public
services with patterns similar to retirement residences, which is what it will replace in the
use tables. Additionally, assisted living has staff on duty to respond to resident needs on
a 24-hour basis, this may result in fewer emergency calls than a retirement residence that
does not include 24-hour staffing.
Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action
Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and
the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be
needed.
Not Applicable Non -Project Action.
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance
H:IEDNSPITitIe IVOocket120071Environmental Checklist_21Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement V1.doc 11
that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
r
Proponent:[
Name Printed: 'Rtbeccct t
Date:�'l
H:IEDNSP1Title hADocket120071Environmental CheckIist_2Docket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement_Vi.doc 12
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and
programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.)_
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the
list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than
if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Not applicable, Non project action.
Assisted Living: Any discharges would be evaluated at the time of a project specific proposal.
Although the resulting density may be higher than typical multi -family development, the resulting
buildings will still meet the development regulations of the zone without variance to the setback
requirements, etc.
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones: Any discharges would be
evaluated at the time of a project specific proposal.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Not applicable.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Not applicable.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands?
Not applicable. This proposal does not affect those areas.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow
or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Not applicable.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None.
H:IEDNSMTiVe IV1Dockefl2D07\Environmental CheckTst_Mocket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement_VLdoc 13
5. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and
utilities?
Not applicable.
Assisted Living: Need for transportation and public services would be evaluated at the time of a
specific project proposal. However, because most assisted living facilities provide transportation
for residents and older people make fewer vehicle trips per day than typical drivers the need for
transportation is expected to be no greater than a typical multi -family project, if not less. It is
expected that assisted living facilities will result in a need for public services with patterns similar
to retirement residences, which is what it will replace in the use tables. Additionally, assisted
living has staff on duty to respond to resident needs on a 24-hour basis, this may result in fewer
emergency calls than a retirement residence that does not include 24-hour staffing.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
None.
SIGNATURE
Undersigned, the state, and I that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance
that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent: Ph g, aectut hI�
Name Printed: �' b ),I
Date: 51/111 U�
ENVCHLST.DOC
REVISED 6/98
K, EDNSP17itie IVtdocket120071Environmental Checklist_Mocket Items —Assisted Living and Height Requirement Vi.doc 14
Docket Item 06-28: Assisted Living Code Amendments
Back ound: The City of Renton currently does not have a definition for assisted living. Assisted
living is a type of housing for older people that has been in place as a housing type for a number of
years. The City needs to implement a definition for this housing type and some development
standards regarding this type of housing.
Summary of proposed changes:
■ Implement a definition for assisted living that allows kitchens in units and indicates that the staff
administers an element of personal care to residents.
■ Revise the definition for convalescent centers so that the distinction between assisted living and
convalescent is clear and identifies that a skilled nursing staff administers convalescent care.
■ Implement a new definition for multi -family assisted living.
■ Apply density to assisted living facilities, but allow them to develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per
the base density of the zone.
- Example: an assisted living facility that wanted to locate in the RMF zone would
determine density by multiplying 1.5 x 20 to determine a maximum number of residential
units of 30.
■ Replace retirement residences with assisted living in the zoning use tables. Allow assisted
living facilities in the R-14 zone. Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zone to a
maximum of 18 total residential units per acre.
■ Require 1 parking space per residential unit of assisted living, plus dedicated parking spaces for
facility fleet vehicles.
Issue Discussion: An administrative determination was made that assisted living is "most similar to
convalescent centers/nursing homes in the care and type of services they provide" and the facilities
were considered a commercial use. As a commercial use assisted living has not been subject to the
density limits of the zone they located are in. Assisted living being built now typically includes full
kitchens and is more similar to apartment buildings than convalescent centers and should be subject
to density. However, assisted living units are smaller than apartment units and built with a higher
percentage of studios and one -bedrooms than apartment buildings. Therefore, a density ratio of 1.5
should be allowed for assisted living facilities.
The amount of parking required for assisted living needs to be higher than the requirements for a
convalescent center because residents do bring cars, but not with as much frequency as typical
multi -family. A requirement of one parking space per one residential unit balances the parking
needs of staff and guests with the cars brought by residents. Finally, retirement residences are
allowed in the R-1 zone with no maximum density. In replacing retirement residences with assisted
living in the use table and applying density standards to assisted living, it would leave assisted
living in R-I with a maximum density of 1 residential unit. It is recommended that the maximum
allowable number of guest rooms for bed and breakfast houses (10) allowed in the R-1 be used as a
base to determine assisted living maximum density, assume 2 bedrooms for the proprietor, multiply
by the 1.5 ratio, to determine a maximum 18 units in the R-1 zone for assisted living facilities. This
maximum would also be allowed in the R-10 zone.
Available Appeals: Appeals regarding these zoning text changes can be made to the Central Puget
Sound Growth Management Hearings Board.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 4-2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND
STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO
AMEND THE REGULATIONS REGARDING ASSISTED LIVING.
WHEREAS, the City does not have a definition for assisted living; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to define assisted living as a land use and ensure
appropriate development regulations regarding assisted living facilities; and
WHEREAS, in light of the definition for assisted living, the definition for
convalescent centers needs to be amended to provide clarity; and
WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for
investigation, study, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning
Commission, and said zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the
City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 24, 2008 having
duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing
in support thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 4-2-060D the other residential, lodging and home
occupations section of the Zoning Use Table of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
Page 1 of 1 l4-1
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so that the
words "Retirement residences" are stricken and replaced in alphabetical order with
"Assisted living", but all letters and numbers associated with the zones allowed the use is
allowed in are retained and applied to "Assisted living". Also, in the same row, now
named "Assisted living", place a letter "P" in the column associated with the R-14 zone.
SECTION II. Section 4-2-070 Zoning Use Tables of Chapter 2, Zoning
Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No.
4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby
amended so that in all tables all instances of the phrase "Retirement residences" is
stricken and replaced in alphabetical order with "Assisted living"; in all instances the
letters and/or numbers in the Type column are to be retained from the "retirement
residences" and applied to "assisted living".
SECTION III. 4-2-07OG Residential — 14 DU/AC (R-14) of the Zoning
Use Table of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development
Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of
Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so that "Assisted living" is added alphabetically
to the Other Residential, Lodging and Home Occupations category with the letter "P"
placed accordingly in the Type column.
SECTION IV. 4-2-110A Development Standards for Single
Family Residential Zoning Designations of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
Page 2 of 1 144
of General Ordinances of the City of Denton, Washington" is hereby amended so that the
box associated with Maximum Housing Density in the R-1 zone reads:
1 dwelling unit per 1 net acre except that in designated Urban Separators,
density of up to 1 unit per gross acre may be permitted subject to
conditions in RMC-3-110, Urban Separator Overlay. Assisted living
bonus: l_5 times the nlaxin1unO ticnsity may be allowed subject to
conditions of 4-9-065.
SECTION V. 4-2-1 1OF Development Standards Residential Zoning
Designations of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances
of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so that the box associated with
Maximum Housing Density in the R-10 zone reads:
For developments or subdivisions including attached or semi -attached
dwellings: 10 dwelling units per net acre.4 Assisted living bonus: 1.5
tunes the maximum density iimv bL: Alowed subject to conditions of 4-9-
065.
Also, so that the box associated with Maximum Housing Density in the R-14 zone reads:
For developments or subdivisions: 14 dwelling units per net acre, except
that density of up to 18 dwelling units per acre may be permitted subject to
conditions in RMC 4-9-065, Density Bonus Review.° Assisted livin
bonus: 1.5 times the mn.61It1111 density rnay be allowed subject to
conditions ol'4-9-065.
Page 3 of 1 1 -4
Affordable housing bonus: Up to 30 dwelling units per acre may be
permitted on parcels a minimum of two acres in size if 50% or more of the
proposed dwelling units are affordable to low income households with
incomes at or below 50% of the area median income. Up to 45 dwelIing
units per net acre for assisted living may be permitted on parcels a
minimum of two acres in size if 50% or more of the proposed dwelling
units are affordable to low income households with incomes at or below
50% of the area median income and subject to the conditions in RMC 4-9-
065.
Finally, so that the box associated with Maximum Housing Density in the RM zone reads:
For any subdivision and/or development: 4
"U" suffix: 75 units per net acre. 10, 24
"T" suffix: 35 units per net acre.10
"F" suffix: 20 units per net acre.
Assisted livinp, bonus: 1.5 the Eraximum density may he allowed subject to
conditions of 4-9-065.
SECTION VI. 4-2-120A Development Standards for Commercial Zoning
Designations of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances
of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so that the box associated with
Maximum Net Residential Density in the CN zone reads:
4 dwelling units per structure. :assisted livint; bonus: 1.5_ times the
maximum density may be al1w\ ed Subject to conditions of 4-9-065.
Page 4 of l I -1-
Also, so that the box associated with Maximum Net Residential Density in the CV zone
reads:
80 dwelling units per net acre. Assisted living bonus: 1.5 tirnes the
maximum dcnsity may be allkm ccl �uhiect to conditions of 4-9-065.
SECTION VII. 4-2-120B Development Standards for Commercial Zoning
Designations of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title 1V
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances
of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so that the box associated with
Maximum Net Residential Density in the CD zone reads:
100 dwelling units per net acre.9 Density may be increased to 150
dwelling units per net acre subject to Administrative Conditional Use
approval. Assisted living homes: 1.5 times the maximum density may he
allowed subject to conditi_on� 01'4-Q-005_
Also, so that the box associated with Maximum Net Residential Density in the COR zone
reads:
50 dwelling units per net acre. Assisted liyin(, bonus: 1.5 times the
maximum density may be al lov, ed tiul)jeet to conditions of'4-9-065.
The same area used for commercial and office development can also be
used to calculate residential density. Where commercial and/or office
areas are utilized in the calculation of density, the City may require
restrictive covenants to ensure the maximum density is not exceeded
should the property be subdivided or in another manner made available for
separate lease or conveyance.
Page 5 of 1 1-4
SECTION VHL 4-2-120E Development Standards for Commercial Zoning
Designations of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances
of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so that the box associated with
Maximum Net Residential Density in the UC-N1 zone reads:
85 dwelling units per net acre.4 kssisted living bonus: 1.5 times the
maximum density may be allmvcd ,,uhiect to conditions of4-9-065.
When around -floor coi inercial uses are incorporated into the
structure: density for flats may be increased up to 150 dwelling units per
net acre. Assisted living bonus: 1.5 times the maximum density may be
allowed subject to condition, A'4-9-_005.
Also, so that the box associated with Maximum Net Residential Density in the UC-N2
zone reads:
South of North 8th Street: t 50 dwelling units per net acre.4 Assisted
living bonus: 1.5 times the ni�i.linuini density nnay be allowed subject to
conditions ot'4-9-065.
North of North 8th Street: 250 dwelling units per net acre. Assisted
living bonus: 1.5 times the ifr,WfflLfln density may be allowed subject to
coriditions of'4-9-065.
SECTION IX. 4-4-OSOF Parking Lot Design Standards of Chapter
4, City -Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" is hereby amended so that part e Parking Spaces Required Based on Land
Page 6 of 1 144
Use of number 10 Number of Parking Spaces Required so that in the Residential Uses
Outside of Downtown Core category a new row is added to be read "Assisted living" in
the Use column. Also, so that the same new row associated with "Assisted living", reads:
1 parking space per residcntkil unit of assisted livin'> >lus dedicated
parking spaces for facility Beet �chicics.
Also, to add a new row titled "Assisted living" in the Residential Uses in Downtown
Core category and so that in the column associated with Number of Required Spaces
reads:
1 parking space JMe residl,'110;11 gild of assisted living, plus dedicated
parking spaces for facility tcct �Ics.
SECTION X. RMC 4-9-065 Density Bonus Review of Chapter 9, Permits —
Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so that
Section B Applicability reads:
The density bonus review procedure and review criteria are applicable to
applicants who request bonuses in the zones which specifically authorize
density bonuses in chapter 4-2 RMC. This Section of chapter 4-9 RMC
contains density bonus procedures and review criteria for the R-14, RM-U,
and assisted living.
Also, so that in section D Bonus Allowances and Review Criteria a new column titled
"ASSISTED LIVING" is added. In the new column in the box associated with Density
and Unit Size Bonus — Purpose to add new text to read:
Page 7 of l 1-I--4-
The bonus provisions are intc>>ci2d io allow assisted living to develop Mth
higher densities, but with �i hulkiin , footprint and scale of' bLtilding that
would be expected for other iiit,It[-]aiiiily strrictures in the applicable zone.
It is expected that the density ihonus >.vill be achieved .with no variances to
the development regulation., of th��,i �7licable zone.
In the new column "ASSISTED LIVING" in the box associated with Maximum
Additional Units Per Acre new text to read:
The units in a project that irk I'Or assisted living are allowed to devetop at
1.5 times the maximum detisil% of tlic /,one the project is in. In the_R-1
and R-10 cones the iiiaxi>> rii d�n�ity for assisted living shall be 18
units/net acre.
In the new column "ASSISTED LIVING" in the box associated with Maximum
Allowable Bonus Dwelling Unit Mix/Arrangement new text to read:
Proiects that include both as;i:t�'cl lit int, and independent living may only
apply the density bonus railo ;,i the units that are built as assisted livill
units.
In the new column "ASSISTED LIVING" in the box associated with Bonus Criteria new
text to read:
Assisted living) uiiits must hC e Cslf _,hated f'or people who are at least 55
_years of age. The del init]mi.s eel" ;'assisted Living. in RMC 4-1 1-010 and
Dwelling; Multi -Family, Assisted 1„1t ivy_ in RMC 4-1 1-040 must be met_
SECTION XI. 4-11-010 Definitions A of Chapter 11 Definitions, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) or Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Page 8 of 1 114
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to add a new
definition to read:
ASSISTED LIVING: A Ilicilliy wli�re resident5 live in private units and
receive assistance with 11MIicci_ aspLCts of personal care, such as: taking
medication, bathin,, or dressiri,l. Nlcals are provided multiple times daily
in a common dinin7 area. �t il]' is on duty 24-hours per day to ensure the
Nvelfare and safety of' This definition does not inelude:
convalescent centers con{Trc_!xt resi Iences boarding and lodging houses,
adult family honks, and grpujl komc, I and II.
SECTION XIL 4-11-030 Definitions C of Chapter 11 Definitions, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended so that the definition
for Convalescent Centers reads:
CONVALESCENT CENTER: A a aeili,� facility licensed by the State
for patients who are recovering health and strength after illness or injury,
or receiving long-term care for chronic conditions, disabilities, or terminal
illnesses. xhei-e"-eai—e—iiieludt�, oit,_,ti,i3"iedical t.• atn ,t ,arcs c ci�
care facilities. Facilities pru idu 4-hour supervised nursing care and
feature extended treatment th.it is aclniinistered by a skilled nursin , staff.
Typically. residents do nol....live it individual units and the facilities
provide personal care, I-0011i. bo,.ird, laundry service, and or Tad sized
activities. This definition does not include adult family homes, assisted
Page 9 of 1 144
t[v, group homes II, medical institutions, and/or secure community
transition facilities.
SECTION XIiI. 4-11-040 Definitions D of Chapter I I Definitions, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to add a new
definition lettered F in the "Dwelling, Multi -Family definitions, to read:
F. Assisted Living: A re,,Id�:ntlal huilding containing two (2) or more
dwelling units where rcsiLlCIIIS ro,•,:iye assistance with personal care.
Dtivcllina units include a full kitchen (..jnk, oven or range, and refrigerator)
or a kitchenette, a bathroom, �t area. and niay include a calls stem.
On the premiscs, facilities ,hail iIIL' side: a professional kitchen, common
dining room, recreatiort ,tre.,i , ,t�,tl%_ity room, and a laundry area. An on -
site small-scale Iacilitk that oilcrs skilled nursing care on a temporary
basis is alloNvable when the nuMher of'beds reserved Ior the medical care
is no greater than five perc-,,iv, ( S ) Of the total number of living units at
the premises.
SECTION XIV. 4-11-ISO Definitions R of Chapter 11 Definitions, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Waslington" is hereby amended to strike the definition
for Retirement Residence.
SECTION XV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage,
approval, and thirty days after publication.
Page 10 of I 1 It
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12008.
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12008.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD,
Denis Law, Mayor
Page 11 of 1114
Maximum Height Requirement for Utilities in Residential Zones
Background
• Height in Renton's R-1, R-4, and R-8 zones are two stories and 30 feet. Above
ground and elevated water tanks cannot meet these standard heights due to the
operational and functional uses of the facilities.
• Public facilities are defined in the Renton Municipal Code as: streets, roads,
highways, sidewalks, street lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water system;
storm and sanitary sewer systems, park and recreation facilities, schools, public
buildings
• In the past, variances have been granted to height standards for the construction of
new public facilities in residential zones. However, the variance is not the correct
zoning tool to use in this instance because variances are property specific, and
findings are required for hardship based on the physical constraints of the parcel.
The Hearing Examiner requested this code amendment.
Recommendation
• Allow additional height for aboveground and elevated water reservoirs and public
utility facilities.
o 175 feet for aboveground standpipe water reservoir, an elevated water tank, a
water treatment facility to the highest point of the water storage reservoir.
o 50 feet maximum height for water facilities, such as water treatment facilities,
and pump stations.
• Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump stations through the
administrative site plan review process.
• Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan review
process.
• Require graphic treatment of water tanks.
o Public art to be reviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission and be
eligible for 1% for art funding.
• Cost of public art on water tanks
o Staff contacted three regional water utility providers with murals on water
tanks (City of Tacoma, Sammamish Plateau Water and Sewer District, and
Northshore Utility District) and a Renton -based artist who has painted more
than a dozen murals on water tanks in the Puget Sound area.
o Usually part of a new construction budget or a maintenance upgrade.
o $30,000 for 3-million gallon tank up to 65 feet tall for a two colors tree pattern
360 ° in circumference.
o $18,000 for design and painting and covered 180' of the tank's circumference.
o Sammamish Plateau Water and Sewer District has recently cleaned and
painted a 7-million gallon tank with a mural for $25,000.
Appeal Process: To the Hearing Examiner for administrative determinations; to the City
Council for Hearing Examiner determinations or Arts Commission decisions