Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1LHo-) sue-, 4 Al z - z-.e- SO) 6e-> r T 4 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: June 29, 2010 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Monopole I in Residential Zones Text Amendment LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-025, ECF Cross -References: ORD 5381 AKA's: Monopole I Text Amendment, Monopole I Wireless Facilities Project Manager: Rebecca Lind Acceptance Date: March 26, 2008 Applicant: City of Renton Owner: N/A Contact: Rebecca Lind, City of Renton PID Number: N/A ERC Approval Date: April 14, 2008 ERC Appeal Date: May 5, 2008 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: 2008 Docket Item #08-01: Text Amendment for Monopole I in residential zones and, housekeeping amendments to wireless regulations in all zones. Location: Citywide Comments: STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on April 19, 2008, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $92.40. Linda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 21st day of April, 2008. Kathy Dals , N tary Public the State of Washington, Residing in Covingtt5n, Washington P. O. Number: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non -significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code, Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in all Zones LUA 08-025, ECF Location: Citywide. The proposed amendment is to reduce the land area required for siting the Monopole 1 from one acre to one-half acre, provide a conditional use process for setback of less than one hundred feet, and restrict the location of Monopole I facilities in the right-of-way to arterials. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p-m. on May 5, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner arc �ovemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.1i. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be ohlaincd from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (4251 430-6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on April 19, 2008. 969065. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE POSTED TO NOTIFY INTEF:ESTE-D PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Nfaeless Regulations In ail Zones PROJECT NUMBER: LUA 08-025, ECI LOCATION; Citywide DESCRIPTION: The pmposed amendment is m reduce the land area required for siting the Monopole I from one a e to one-half acre, provide a conditional use process for setback of less than one h sad red feet. and reslnct the location of Monopole I facilities in the dgl Way to artemde, THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIROl REVIE'N COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT H-r1E A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental daterminalicn must he filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. an May 5, 2008, Appeals must be filed in writing together wilh the required $75,nh application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1065 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98n57. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8- Additional information rega,dmg the appeal process may he obtained from the Renton City Clerk'sOffice Oce, 425,430.6510- IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OFTERl'Al ION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLFASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON. LONG l PLANNING SECTION AT 425.430.6588. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper Elie identification. CERTIFICATION I, S Sd, hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described property o�x�i�ll,f f DATE: /� D $ S IGNED: A=T: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in ''' - - s � on the. 17 — day of NOTARY PUBLI SIG CITY OF RENTON LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 151h day of April, 2008, i deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Agency Letter and Signature Sheet documents. This information was sent to: Agencies I See Attached (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) } SS COUNTY OF KING ) certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Judith Subia signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Lj-jL.L-oR Notary (Print): My appointment expires: _ dText Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones LUA08-025, ECF template - affidavit of service by mailing All AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology WDFW - Larry Fisher Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave NW, Ste 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 172"d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Amry Corp. of Engineers KC Wastewater Treatment Division Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning - DAP Preservation Attn: SEPA Reviewer 201 S. Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-0505 Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Boyd Powers Dept. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev_ & Environmental Serv_ City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"6 Place Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98059 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Gary Kriedt, Senior Environmental Planner Joe Jainga, Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 201 South Jackson Street, KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W 6300 Southeenter Blvd. Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 1601h Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 template - affidavit of service by mailing Denis Law, Mayor April 16, 2008 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject, Environmental Determinations CITY _ F RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination'for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 14, 2008: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in all Zones PROJECT NUMBER: LUA 08-025, ECF LOCATION: Citywide DESCRIPTION: The proposed amendment is to reduce the land area required for siting the Monopole I from one acre to one-half acre, provide a conditional use process for setback of less than one hundred feet, and restrict the location of Monopole. I facilities in the right-of-way to arterials. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p m. on May 5, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:. Pleating Examiner, City of Renton, 1055. South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals. to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section :4-8=114.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process maybe obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6576. For the Environmental Review Committee, 'I Rebecca Lind Long Range Planning Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwarnish Tribal .Office " Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Krasner, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1055 South Grady Way -.Renton, Washington 98057 . 8 The paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30% post cansumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA08-025, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in all Zones DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed amendment is to reduce the land area required for siting the Monopole I from one acre to one-half acre, provide a conditional use process for setback of less than one hundred feet, and restrict the location of Monopole I facilities in the right-of-way to arterials. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Citywide LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division This Determination of Non -Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 5, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: April 19, 2008 DATE OF DECISION: April 14, 2008 SIGNATURES: Gregg er an, dministrator Date Public Mks ' __ V-- -t1 I `d 06 Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Date Community Services r 1. David Daniels, Fire Chief Date "ietasrcfhT,. `V min- trator Date Department of Community & Economic Development ERG City of Renton REPORT Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: April 14, 200 S Project Name: Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in all Zones Owner: NIA Applicant: City of Renton Contact: Rebecca Lind, City of Renton File Number: LUA08-025, ECP Project Manager: Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager Project Summary: The proposed amendment is to reduce the land area required for siting the Monopole I from one acre to one-half acre, provide a conditional use process for setback of less than one hundred feet, and restrict the location of Monopole I facilities in the right-of-way to arterials. Project Location: Citywide Exist. Bldg. Area SF: NA Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): NIA Site Area: NIA Total Building Area GSF: NA STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). Project Location Map ERC REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Commu & Ecomomic Development Envir ental Review Committee Report TEXT AMENDMENT FOR MONO_ _ _E IIN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND HO U EEPING AMENDMENTS TO WIRELESS REGULATIONS IN ALL ZONES L UA08-025 Report of April 14, 2008 Page 2 of 2 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 BACKGROUND The proposed amendment application would allow Monopole I structures on a one half acre lot with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit provided that they meet a one hundred feet (100') setback from a residential zone. The proposed amendmenat also creates some additional flexibility within the code to allow a lesser setback with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. In the public right-of-way, Monopole I would only be allowed on designated arterial roads, A Monopole I is defined as "A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60') in height erected to support wireless communications antennas and connecting appurtenances." The changes proposed are needed by wireless providers to continue providing service to Renton residents. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. None C. Exhibits None D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have no probable impacts. E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ✓ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 5, 2008. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ERC REPORT. doe Docket 08-01 Text Amendments for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in All Zones Changes in Standards for Monopole I The existing development standards for Monopole I require a minimum lot size of one acre for this facility in all residential zones, ranging from the Resource Conservation (RC) through the Residential --14 (R-14). Monopole structures of this type currently are permitted with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit (HE -CUP) and they are required to have a minimum setback of 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned property. A Monopole I is defined as "A wireless conrnnunication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60 ) in height erected to support wireless communications antennas and connecting appurtenances. " The proposal is to • Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with o Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties. o Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties. o Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads. The proposed change would allow the Monopole I structure to be more easily sited within residential zones than is currently the case. Housekeeping Amendments Housekeeping amendments are needed to resolve inconsistencies within the existing code. These changes clarify language, make the processing of applications consistent with the existing requirements in the 4-2-080 Conditions for Zoning Use Tables, and add a cross reference to the code sections where the decision criteria for use permits are published. These amendments also change the names of reviewing staff to the more generalized "Reviewing Official". These proposed changes make no changes in the regulatory content of this section of code, but increase the consistency and accuracy of the code. Notice and Appeals Both HE -CUP and Administrative CUP processes require notice to contiguous property owners and owners within 300 feet of the proposal. The Hearing Examiner Permit process requires a public hearing. The Administrative Permit process may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner, while the HE -CUP is appealed to the City Council. City of Reihon Department of Cernmunity & Economic Devs,,,,_ meet ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-025, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26, 2008 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind PROJECT TITLE: Monopole I in Residential Zones Text Amendment ' PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO ` JUDITH SUBiA IN CED, FLOOR SIX SITE AREA: Citywide LOCATION: CITYWIDE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas; Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with: Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads; Reconcile inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments A. ENWRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Mirror Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing__ Aesthetics L_ hVGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is Q@eded to properly assess this proposal, Signature of Director or 0-7_Q'0 Da City of Re,_ __n Department of Community & Economic De meet ENVIRONMENTAL S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f kee COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-025, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26, 2008 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind PROJECT TITLE: Monopole I in Residential Zones Text Amendment PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO JUDITH SUBIA IN CED, FLOOR SIX SITE AREA: Ci ide LOCATION: CITYWIDE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas; Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with: Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads; Reconcile inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments A. ENIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housin Aesthetics t_i hilGlare Recreation Utilities Trans oriation Public Services HistoricCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet W, APO, I C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS �.,pD Meea/zLr We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -- - 3A 705 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CityofRe..-___ Department of Community & Economic Devs::,pment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: an&U&M i COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-025, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26, 2008 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind PROJECT TITLE: Monopole I in Residential Zones Text Amendment PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO JUDITH SUBIA IN CED, FLOOR SIX SITE AREA: Citywide LOCATION: CITYWIDE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas; Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with: Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads; Reconcile inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air water Plants Land/Shorellne Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS /l/a ME Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services fiistorialCultunal Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wr additional infonnation is ne ded to properly assess this proposal. 'If7 A ; or Date City of Retiuun Department of Community & Economic Dev _ ment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Plm ke COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, ZOOS APPLICATION NO: LUA08-025, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26, 2008 APPLICANT: City of Renton CYYY G PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind C E IV E D PROJECT TITLE: Monopole I in Residential Zones Text Amendment PLEASE RETURN REVIEW"EiA JUDITH SUBIA IN CED, Rj SIV"" SITE AREA: Citywide LOCATION: CITYWIDE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas; Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with: Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads; Reconcile inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy) Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS 0 aw-e- C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS -P-� Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to orooeriv assess this proposal. of Director or Authorized Representative Dat City of Renton Depariment of Community & Economic Dev-,-,meat ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TT(e, COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-025, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26, 2008 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind PROJECT TITLE: Monopole I in Residential Zones Text Amendment PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO JUDITH SUBIA IN CED, FLOOR SIX SITE AREA: Citywide LOCATION: CITYWIDE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL_: Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas; Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with: Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads; Reconcile inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandrShoreRne Use Anlmais Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Al 0 %/ A)f) : V cl Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hMare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services HistoricXuliural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. or Authorized .2 LZ Y_ �2 9' Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Dev_ ment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REIlYllsN'.,;F; REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Insportgfim COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-025, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 26, 2008 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind �� • � ' " a PROJECT TITLE: Monopole I in Residential Zones Text Amendment PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO JUDITH SUBIA 1N CED, FLOOR SIX SITE AREA: Citywide LOCATION: CITYWIDE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas; Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with: Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads; Reconcile inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Informafiorr Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Nave B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS Vvyy C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS A)Oiq Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics U htlGlare Recreation utilibes Transportation Public Services HistoricJCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. of Director or Authorized '36, Date City of Re- ___n Department of Community & Economic Dev .. meet ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 9, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-025, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 262008 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Rebecca Lind PROJECT TITLE: Monopole I in Residential Zones Text Amendment PLEASE RETURN REVIEW SHEET TO JUDITH SUBIA IN CED, FLOOR SIX SITE AREA: Citywide LOCATION: CITYWIDE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas; Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with: Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties, Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads; Reconcile Inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shorellne Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing - Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identlfi d areas of probable impact or are here additi l information�nded;toprop�erlyassess this proposal. l nature OCECrector or Authorized Representative Date Of NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: March 26, 2008 LAND USE NUMBER: LUAO&026, ECF APPLICATION NAME: Teot Amendn,eol for 1k,nnpule I is Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in All Zones (Duckel 408-01) PROJECT LOCATION AND ❑ESCRIPTICN- Th s s rri charge versus a site specific pm)ec1-Tha pmp-.d amendment application would allow, Monocle I st uc: s un a one half acre lot with an Administrallve Conddmnal Use Permit provided that Ileiy meet a one hundred leer i 10C') n 11b k from residential, and create some addidnal flexibility wIII the code to allow a lessor setback with o Hearing Examiner Cor,dillonal Use Permit, in the publlm rghl-o(-way, Monopole I would only Le allowed on designated arterial .ads- A Monopole is defined as "A wvelesa'—dr unicafion support struclura which constsrs ofa lrecslandrng sr+, parr srnmWre. less rdan vhrey fear (66'J ;n he+girl eracted to support wireless emnmunicalions antennas ann co rr ling anyurinnances."The changes proposed are needed by wireless providers to ennui providing service to Rennin -esdents OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NUN-51GNIFICANCE (DNS) As the Lead Agency. the City of Renton has determined that significant environrnenlal impacts are unlikely m ieault frum t(re proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and zoning charges. Therefom. m permitted under the RCIAI a3 2IC 110. the City of Renton is using the Optional ON$ process to give notice that a DNS u likely to be issued Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single cnmmenl period. There wit, Le nu cummerf period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Nnn-Signdiwnce (DNSL Rtn-day appeal aenod wrB (olbw tfle issuance e(Ihe DNS. APPLICATION DATE: March 19, 2008 PermitslRevflrw Requaated: Environmental r SEPAL Rc per+ 2nning'Ie t Amendment, Location where eppliealion m" be reviewed', Del;araner; of Community d Economic Development, Development, Strategic Planning Section. 1055 South Grady way. Renton. vdp. c6357 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing on thew. issue: ,au be held before the City Cnunr-11 on April 21. 2008. Environmental Da inn is that a iilualu the Proposed Project: E,, ire c,,Ial Checklist dated March 113, 2008 Development RegWelione Uaed For Prolecl MitiyaCmu� T",ese non -project actions will be suhjecf to the City's SEPA Ordnance and Development Regulalrc­ and ether soil icnh'e codes and regulations as appropriate. Propnaed Mitigation Measures: The amrrrsrs of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitgatton above and beyond e.,suny code piovislcns However, mitlgalion may be necessary and may he Imposed at me time of a sde speorfic dr:vv.lopn,em piopcsn on the subj.ut it. Corn ants on the above application n usl be s„brn�nea li wdhng to Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager. Department of Community and Economic Ce.veloor,era, 1055 South Goody Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 6.00 p m on April 9, 2008 If you have questions about this uro:x !, ci ++sn ;c :,e made a party of record and receive additional npftrration by at oontact the Project Manager. Anyone roh,. sutanrs written commects will amomaacally become a pony of record and will he notified of any decision on hits pinlu,, CONTACT PERSON: Rebecca Lind (425) 470-6588 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would IIke to receive further infornmion an the ermm�n,ental review of this proposed project. complete this form and return to: Cityof Renton, Department of Corn-�nuri:y an,t E::onomw Development. 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, wA 9Itn57. You musr return Phis form to receive future mlormafion regarding the ertviranmaoial determInat(an for this prod r. File No,JName: LUA68-625, ECF Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulalluns in All Zones (Docket I'f08-01) NAME ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.� CERTIFICATION hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE: 2 �' SIGNED: ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing it , on the 9 La day of STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on March 26, 2008. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $155.40. , WA Inda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 28th day of March, 2008. (6�" 4ek� athy DalseeNotary Public for e S ate of Washington, Residing in Covington, Washington P. O. Number: Notice of Application RENTON, WASHINGTON Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Land Use Number and Application Name: WA 98055. LUA08-025, ECF Text Amendment for PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing Monopole I in Residential Zones and on this issue will be held before the City Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Council on April 21, 2008. Regulations in Ali Zones Development Regulations Used for Project Project Locations and Descriptions: Mitigation: These non -project actions will This is a citywide change versus a site- be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance specific project. The proposed amendment and Development Regulations and other application would allow Monopole I applicable codes and regulations as structures on a one half acre lot with an appropriate. Administrative Conditional Use Permit Proposed Mitigation Measures: The provided that they meet a one hundred feet analysis of the proposal does not reveal any (100') setback from residential, and create adverse environmental impacts requiring some additional flexibility within the code mitigation above and beyond existing code to allow a lesser setback with a Hearing Provision, However, mitigation may be Examiner Conditional Use Permit. In the necessary and may be imposed at the time public right-of-way, Monopole I would only of a site -specific development proposal on be allowed on designated arterial roads. the subject site. A Monopole I is defined as 'A wireless Comments on the above application communication support structure which must be submitted in writing to Rebecca consists of a freestanding support structure, Lind, Long Range Planning Manager, less than sixty feet (60') in height erected to Department of Community and Economic support wireless communications antennas Development, 1055 South Grady Way, and connecting appurtenances." The Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 p.m. on April changes proposed are needed by wireless 9, 2008. If you have questions about this providers to continue providing service to proposal, or wish to be made a party of Renton residents, record and receive additional notification Application Date: March 19, 2008 by mail, contact the Project Manager. PermitstReviewRequested: Environmental Anyone who submits written comments (SEPA) Review, Zoning Text Amendment. will automatically become a party of record Location where application may he and will be notified of any decision on this reviewed: Departrent of Community and Project. Economic Development, Strategic Planning CONTACT NUMBER: (425) 430-6588 Published in the Renton Reporter on March if), 20D8. #59968. CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 26"' day of March, 2008, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application and Environmental Checklist documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached (Signature of Sende STATE OF WASHINGTON } } SS COUNTY OF KING } certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Judith Subia signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.��ww�«+��i� Dated: 31ac��a8 *� Notary Public in for the Sate 'X, s :.Y Notary (Print): rw 6) ".% 1 My appointment expires ►�t `WA i l Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones =:6: `i LUA08-025, ECF template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology * WDFW - Larry Fisher * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " Environmental Review Section 1775 12'h Ave NW, Ste 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 172nd Avenue SE OI m pia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program " Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers " KC Wastewater Treatment Division Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning - OAC Preservation* Attn: SEPA Reviewer 201 S. Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-0505 Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Boyd Powers * Dept. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 The followinA received a Notice of Application only_ . KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community. Development 220 Fourth Avenue South Renton, WA 98055-1219 1 13020 SE 72n° Place Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98059 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Gary Kriedt, Senior Environmental Planner 'i Joe Jainga, Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 201 South Jackson Street, KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Tukwila_,_ WA 98188 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 1601h Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 981244018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an `Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * template - affidavit of service by mailing 1'Y + + NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: March 26, 2008 LAND USE NUMBER. LUA08-025, ECF APPLICATION NAME: Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in All Zones (Docket #08-01) PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: This is a citywide change versus a site specific project. The proposed amendment application would allow Monopole I structures on a one half acre lot with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit provided that they meet a one hundred feet (100') setback from residential, and create some additional flexibility within the code to allow a lesser setback with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. In the public right-of-way, Monopole l would only be allowed on designated arterial roads. A Monopole I is defined as 'A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60) in height erected to support wireless communications antennas and connecting appurtenances. "The changes proposed are needed by wireless providers to continue providing service to Renton residents. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and zoning changes. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. APPLICATION DATE. March 19, 2008 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Zoning Text Amendment. Location where application may be reviewed: Department of Community & Economic Development, Strategic Planning Section, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing on these issues wili be held before the City Council on April 21, 2008. Environmental Documents that evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated March 19, 2008. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: These non -project actions will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site specific development proposal on the subject site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager, Department of Community and Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on April 9, 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager_ Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rebecca Lind (425) 430-6588 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to receive further information on the environmental review of this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Department of Community and Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. You must return this form to receive future information regarding the environmental determination for this project. File No./Name: LUA08-025, ECF Text Amendment for Monopole 1 in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in All Zones (Docket #08-01) NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: City of Renton MAR 19 Z008 LAND USE PERMIT City of Renton Economic Development, MASTER APPLICATI ON borhoods & Strategic Plan PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: City of Renton COMPANY (if applicable): Department of Community & Economic Development ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6588 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Rebecca Lind COMPANY (if applicable): Department of Community & Economic Development ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way CITY: Renton ZIP: 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 425-430-6588, rhlindCd)ci.renton.wa.us PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: 2008 Docket Item 08- 01: Text Amendment for Monopole l in Residential Zones Amendment and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in All zones PROJECTIADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Citywide proposals; Zip Codes: 98055, 98056, 98057, 98058, 98059, 98178, and 98042. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): n/a EXISTING LAND USE(S): rVa PROPOSED LAND USE(S). n/a EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: n/a PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): n/a EXISTING ZONING: n/a PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): n/a SITE AREA (in square feet). n/a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE if applicable): n/a PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): n/a NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): n/a H:%EDNSP1Tit1cPADocket120081MIWirelcssWasterApplication 08-01_VLdoc 3/1W2008 PA PRO.. —CT INFORMA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n1a NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): n1a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n1a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n1a SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Na SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): n1a NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): n1a NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): n1a TION contim PROJECT VALUE: n1a IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): n1a AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. GEOLOGIC HAZARD HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. WETLANDS sq. ft. SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES Approximaterly 6400 ft, of shoreline along the Lake Washington which is a shoreline of the State. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included NIA TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Environmental Checklist 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate apelicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Rebecca Lind . declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or X the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Rebecca Llnd (Signatures of Owner/Re resentativ 6&_Vk4u� Y, cy (Signature of Owner/Representative) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. My appointment expires: H:IEDNSP1Title IV1Docket1200810MI WirelessWaster Application 08-01_Vi.doc 3/19/2008 P.2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identifies impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part ❑). For non -project actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2008 Docket Item 08-01: Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones Amendment and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in All Zones 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton, Department of Community and Economic Development 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager (425) 430-6588 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98055 4. Date checklist prepared: March 19, 2008 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): NIA 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NIA 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N/A 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City Council Action to approve code amendments. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposal is only related to the text amendment and not the housekeeping amendments. The proposed amendment would allow Monopole I structures on a one half acre lot with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit (A -CUP) provided that they meet a 100 feet setback from residential, but create some additional flexibility within the code to allow a lesser setback with a HAEDNSPITitle IV%Docket12008108-01 Wireless\F-mironmental Checklist 08-01_V1.doc 2 Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit (HE -CUP). In the public right-of-way, Monopole I would only be allowed on designated arterial roads. A Monopole I is defined as "A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (609 in height erected to support wireless communications antennas and connecting appurtenances." B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Not Applicable Non -Project Action. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)? Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Not Applicable Non -Project Action. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? if so, describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not Applicable Non -Project Action f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not Applicable Non -Project Action h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action 2. A!R a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. H:IEDNSP1Title IV\Docket12008108-01 Wirefess\Environmental Checklist 08-01 V1.doc 3 Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Are there any off -site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Not Applicable Non -Project Action 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not Applicable Non -Project Action 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not Applicable Non -Project Action 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not Applicable Non -Project Action 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not Applicable Non -Project Action B) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not Applicable Non -Project Action 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of HAMNSPMtle iVlDocket12008108-01 wirelesslEnvironmentai Checklist 08-01_Vi.doc 4 such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: n/a deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other n/a evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other n/a shrubs n/a grass n/a pasture n/a crop or grain n/a wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other n/a water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other n/a other types of vegetation Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not Applicable Non -Project Action d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Citywide but map and text amendments are non -project actions Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other n/a K EDNSRTitle IV\Docket12008108-01 Wireless\Envi ron mental Checklist 08-01 V1,doc 5 Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other n/a Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other n/a b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not Applicable Non -Project Action c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Not Applicable Non -Project Action d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not Applicable Non -Project Action 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not Applicable Non -Project Action. H:IEDNSM-ritle MDocke62008108-0i Wireless%Environmental Checklist 08-01 Vi.doc 6 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not Applicable Non -Project Action_ 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None at this time. At the time of project specific review, some conditions could potentially be placed on hours of operation to control noise impacts. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. Describe any structures on the site. Not Applicable Non -Project Action. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not Applicable Non -Project Action e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Not Applicable Non -Project Action Monopole I projects are currently allowed in residential zones on private property and the proposed amendment would not change this allowance. Monopole I projects would be allowed in public right-of-ways limited to designated arterials in residential zones. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not Applicable Non -Project Action g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable Non -Project Action h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not Applicable Non -Project Action Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not Applicable Non -Project Action j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? HAEDNSPITi0e MDocket12008108-01 Wireless%Environmental Checklist 08-01_V1.doc 7 Not Applicable Non -Project Action k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable Non -Project Action. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Not Applicable Non -Project Action. A Monopole I is a freestanding support structure less than sixty feet (60') in height. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action. A Monopole I structure on residentially zoned sites would need an A -CUP when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties and need a HE -CUP when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not Applicable Non -Project Action- b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? HAEDNSPU tle MDocket12008108-01 Wireiess%Environmental Checklist 08-01 V1.doc 8 Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not Applicable Non -Project Action. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? if so, describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not Applicable Non -Project Action C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not Applicable Non -Project Action. H:IEDNSPITitle MDocketU006108-01 Wireless%Environmental Checklist 08-01V1.doc 9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Not Applicable Non -Project Action e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Not Applicable Non -Project Action g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not Applicable Non -Project Action 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable Non -Project Action. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not Applicable Non -Project Action 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Not Applicable Non -Project Action b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not Applicable Non -Project Action. C. SIGNATURE i, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ll cf. , .(�l G ( V7 Name Printed: 0� �CC L) nr� Date: S H:IEDNSMTitle IVIDocket12008108-01 wireless\EnVronmental Checklist 08-01 V1.doc 10 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the fist of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Not applicable, Non project action. A Monopole I will not increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? These facilities would be similar to other wireless communication support structures in the City and have a similar affect. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not applicable. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Not applicable. This proposal does not affect those areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not applicable. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 5. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? H:IEDNSP710a lV\Docket12008108-01 Wireless\Environmental Checklist 08-01_V1.doc �� The proposal would only be likely to increase demands on transportation through the installation process of these support structures and their regular maintenance. Not applicable. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None. SIGNATURE Undersigned, the state, and I that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ULU44pn a Name Printed: etolti Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6198 H:%EDNSPITitle iV\Docket1200&08-01 Wireless\Environmcntal Checklist OM1_V1.doc 12 y DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC C� DEVELOPMENT N�o M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 17, 2008 TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager (x 6588) SUBJECT: Docket 08-01: Text Amendment for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to Wireless Regulations in All Zones ISSUE: • Should the minimum lot size required for Monopole I facilities on private property in residential zones be reduced from one acre to one half acre? • Should Monopole I facilities in the public right-of-way be limited to designated arterials in residential zones? • Should the minimum setbacks from a Monopole I in a residentially zoned property be retained at 100 feet with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit process, but be eligible for reduction to less than 100 feet through a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit process? • Should housekeeping amendments be made to reconcile differences between the zoning notes and zoning use tables? • Should the proposed amendments to the Wireless Regulations be processed as an exception to the annual docket process? RECOMMENDATION: • Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas. • Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with o Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned properties. o Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties. o Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads. • Reconcile inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments. HAMNSMitle 1V1Docket12008108-01 Wirelessllssue Pup(;rvlcloc Marcie Palmer, Council President Page 2 of 3 March 17, 2008 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Changes in Standards for Monopole I The existing development standards for Monopole I require a minimum lot size of one acre for this facility in all residential zones, ranging from the Resource Conservation (RC) through the Residential —14 (R-14). A Monopole I is defined as "A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestandinla support structure, less than sixty feet (60 ) in height erected to support wireless communications antennas and connecting appurtenances. " Monopole structures of this type currently are permitted with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit (HE -CUP) and they are required to have a minimum setback of 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned property. Tlie proposal is to allow Monopole I structures on a one half acre lot with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit (A -CUP) provided that they meet a 100 feet minimum setback from residential, but create some additional flexibility within the code to allow a lesser setback with an HE -CUP. In the public right-of-way, Monopole I would only be allowed on designated arterial roads. The proposed change would allow the Monopole I structure to be more easily sited within residential zones than is currently the case. At the present time, it is difficult for the wireless providers to find appropriately located parcels of one acre. This situation is a result of the urbanization of infill land in the City. As urban land is increasingly redeveloped for housing, it will be more difficult to find parcels of sufficient size in locations that can provide the kind of network needed to provide wireless service to customers throughout the City. Technology changes in the wireless industry over the last ten years have resulted in more requests from wireless providers for transmitters located on Monopole I facilities rather than the higher and more intrusive Monopole 11 towers. As a result, there is increased demand for Monopole I locations at a time when there are fewer large parcels of urban land. Both permit processes require notice to contiguous property owners and owners within 300 feet of the proposal. The Hearing Examiner Permit process requires a public hearing. The Administrative Permit process may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner, while the HE -CUP is appealed to the City Council. Both processes require the Reviewing Official to approve based on the following criteria: J. SPECIAL DECISION CRITERIA FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN LIEU OF STANDARD CRITERIA: The governing authority shall consider the following factors in determining whether to issue a conditional use permit, although the governing authority may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these criteria if the governing authority, concludes that the goals ofRMC 4-4-140, Wireless Communication Facilities, are better served thereby. (Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997) 1. Height of the proposed tower. h:lednspltitle Mdocket12008108-01 wirelesslissue papervIdoc Marcie Palmer, Council President Page 3 of 3 March 17, 2008 2. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. 3. Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties. 4. Surrounding topography. 5. Surrounding tree coverage and foliage. 6. Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. 7. Proposed ingress and egress. 8. Potential noise, light and glare impacts. 9. Availability of suitable existing towers and other structures. 10. Compatibility with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City. (Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997). Housekeoing Amendments Housekeeping amendments are needed to resolve inconsistencies within the existing code. These changes clarify language, make the processing of applications consistent with the existing requirements in the 4-2-080 Conditions for Zoning Use Tables, and add a cross reference to the code sections where the decision criteria for use permits are published. These amendments also change the names of reviewing staff to the more generalized "Reviewing Official". These proposed changes make no changes in the regulatory content of this section of code, but increase the consistency and accuracy of the code. A draft of the proposed code amendments is shown in Attachment A. Docket Exception The docket process exception is requested because under the annual docket review cycle, this code amendment could not be processed for approximately one year. CONCLUSION: The changes proposed are needed by wireless providers to continue providing service to Renton residents. h:lednspltitle ivldocket12008108-01 wirclesslissue Ixiper%3.doc ATTACHMENT A. 4-2-060 ZONING USE TABLE — USES ALLOWED IN ZONING DESIGNATIONS: USES: IRC R-1 R-4 R-8 IRMH R-10 R-14 IRM JIL JIM IN JCN JCV IP. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES CD 1CO �COR JUC- 11 N1 1 Lattice towers support structures H48 AD47 AD47 AD47 H48 H48 AD47 H48 AD47 H48 Macro facility antennas AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 A046 AD46 AD46 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 H Micro facility antennas P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Mini facility antennas P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 AL Minor modifications to existing wireless communication facilities P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P P. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES (CONTINUED) Monopole I support structures on private AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD46 P44 P44 P44 AD46 P44 P44 AD46 P44 AD46 property Monopole I support structures on public AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 P44 P44 P44 P46 P44 P44 AD46 P44 AD46 Monopole 11 support structures I I I I I IH48 JAD47 IAD47 JAD47 IH48 IH48 JAD47 H48 JAD47 IH48 Parabolic antennas -- Large AD45 JAD45 JAD45 JAD45 JAD45 AD45 JAD45 IH46 IP44 IP44 IP44 JAD46 IP44 IP44 AD46 IP44 JAD46 P=Permitted Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-040C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement District; RMC 4-3-050 Critical Areas Regulations; RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Regulations