HomeMy WebLinkAboutScoring Document Kennydale Lakeline Sewer System Improvements2019
NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:
NAME OF RATER:
EVALUATION OF WRITTEN PROPOSAL
Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications/Proposal,and evaluate the following elements/sections based
upon the scoring system described below:
Inadequate= 1,Acceptable=2,Good=3, Excellent=4,Outstanding=5
Multiply points by Weighting Factor(WF)where used (e.g.Good =3 pts x WF of 2=6 Total Pts)
Project Approach
Item Description Weighting Total
Factor Points
(WF)
1 Proposed Approach,Scope of Work,and Tasks are compatible with City 1
practices(preparation of scope of work,breakdown of project into tasks
and milestones,adequate field and background research,etc.)
2 Proposed tasks appear to meet the needs of project,preliminary scope of 2
work,and the project goals.
3 Preliminary time schedule for the tasks appears to be realistic. 2
Task sequencing is logical,appropriate.
4 Time estimates for key member's work on tasks appear to be realistic and 1
appropriate.
5 Is a quality control program included? Do task leads/senior staff perform 1
quality reviews of products?
SUBTOTAL:
Project Management
Item Description Weighting Total
Factor Points
(WF)
1 Evaluate firms approach to organize and carry out the work. 1
2 Evaluate organization chart, how team members,sub-consultants will 1
interface with project and project tasks.
SUBTOTAL:
Project Team Members—Qualification and Expertise as Related to the Requirements of this Project
Item Description Weighting Total
Factor Points
(WF)
1 Experience and technical expertise of proposed Project Manager/task 2
leaders.
2 Experience/expertise of proposed team members in design of wastewater 2
lift stations and wastewater lakelines.
3 Experience/expertise of proposed team members in environmental 1
analysis and Shoreline permitting.
4 Time estimates and availability of key team members for the project 1
5 Experience/expertise of proposed sub-consultant(s) in their professional 1
areas and in similar projects. (if no sub-consultants proposed score a 3)
6 Evaluate the similar project examples the firm provided,and how well the 1
firm performed on the similar project examples.
7 How did the firm perform in terms of budget and schedule on the similar 1
projects provided?
SUBTOTAL:
Overall Evaluation
Item Description Weighting Total
Factor Points
(WF)
1 Quality of work by firm/team members on previous City of Renton 1
projects,and knowledge of Renton standards.
(if you know of no previous work for City,score a 2 on this item).
2 Overall evaluation of Proposal and ability of Firm to do the project work. 2
3 Affirmative action,enter a 2 if the firm is a registered MBE,WBE,or DBE 1
firm,and a 0 if not,or if unknown.
SUBTOTAL:
TOTAL SCORE: