Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 4909AMENDS ORD 4498 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4909 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2001 AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S 1995 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MAPS AND DATA IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton has heretofore adopted and filed a "Comprehensive Plan" and the City Council of Renton has implemented and amended said "Comprehensive Plan" from time to time, together with the adoption of various codes, reports and records; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heretofore duly recommended to the City Council, from time to time, certain amendments to the City's "Comprehensive Plan;" and WHEREAS, the City of Renton, pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management Act, has been required to review its "Comprehensive Plan;" and WHEREAS, the City has held public hearings on this matter on June 7th and 13th, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made certain findings and recommendations to the City Council, including making finding pursuant to Title IV Renton Municipal Code Section 4-9-020.G, Review Criteria for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Adoption Process; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly determined after due consideration of the testimony and evidence before it that it is advisable and appropriate to amend and modify the City's "Comprehensive Plan;" and WHEREAS, such modification and elements for the "Comprehensive Plan" being in the best interest and for the public benefit; 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4909 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The "Comprehensive Plan," maps, data and reports in support of the "Comprehensive Plan" are hereby modified, amended and adopted as said "Comprehensive Plan" consisting of the following elements: Capital Facilities Element text, Land Use Map and Land Use Element text, as shown on the attached Exhibits A, B, and C, and incorporated herein as if fully set forth. SECTION HI. The Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary changes on said City's "Comprehensive Plan" and the maps in conjunction therewith to evidence the aforementioned 2001 amendments. SECTION TV. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file this ordinance as provided by law, and a complete copy of said document likewise being on file with the office of the City Clerk of the City of Renton. SECTION V. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of August ,2001. ORDINANCE NO. 4909 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 13th day of August , 2001 Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 8/17/2001 ORD.923:7/23/01:ma JesgjyTanner, Mayor 3 EXHIBIT A CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT (#2001-T-1) Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT CAPITAL FACILTIES ELEMENT 2001 to 2006 GOAL 1. Develop and implement the capital facilities plan for the City of Renton. 1 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS CAPITAL USE FACILITIES Growth Management Act 4 Growth Projections 5 Capital Facilities Plan Policies 6 Transportation Capital Facilities Plan 7 Water Capital Facilities Plan , 14 Wastewater Capital Facilities Plan 19 Surface Water Utility Capital Facilities Plan 23 Park, Recreation and Open Space 27 Public Safety Capital Facilities Plan 39 Fire Capital Facilities Plan 40 Economic Development/Aininistration 44 2 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Purpose The purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan is: • to identify the new or expanded public facilities that will be needed to accommodate -at an established level of service-the growth projected to occur within the City of Renton in the first six years of the Comprehensive Plan; and . to identify the sources of public financing for these public facilities. Methods and Process The Capital Facilities Plan relies heavily on the analyses and policies presented in the other seven elements of the Comprehensive Plan as well as in the Fire Department Master Plan Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan, Long Range Wastewater Management Plan, Annual Capital Improvements Plan. For detailed information and explanations concerning growth projections, land use determinations, existing facilities, level of service, etc., the reader must consult these documents. The Capital Facilities Plan incorporates by reference the information'and analyses presented in these other documents and the annual updates to these plans concerning existing facilities and level of service standards. Based on these other documents, the Capital Facilities Plan establishes policies for determining which public facilities should be built and how they should be paid for, and presents a six-year plan for the use of public funds toward building and funding the needed capital facilities. The process for arriving at the six-year plan involved identifying existing facilities and level of service standards and then applying the projected growth m residential population and employment to identify the needed capital facilities. The timing of the facilities was established through a combination of the requirements of the city's concurrency policy and the length of time it takes to implement the needed facility. Type and Providers of Capital Facilities For the purposes of complying with the requirements of the GMA, the Capital Facilities Plan proposes a six-year plan for the following capital facilities and providers: transportation domestic water sanitary sewer surface water parks facilities fire police economic development City of Renton City of Renton City of Renton City of Renton City of Renton City of Renton City of Renton City of Renton 3 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT REQUIREMENTS Passed by the legislature in 1990, the Growth Management Act establishes planning goals as well as specific content requirements to guide local jurisdictions in the development and adoption of comprehensive plans. One of the thirteen planning goals stated in the Act is to: Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. (RCW 36.70A.020(12)) To this end, the Act requires that each comprehensive plan contains: A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. (RCW 36.70A.070(3)) With respect to transportation facilities, the Act is more specific, requiring that: ...transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with the development and defining "concurrent with development" to mean "that improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years." (RCW 36.70A.070(6)) The Act also requires that: ...cities shall perform their activities and make capital budget decisions in conformity with their comprehensive plans. (RCW 36.70A. 120) Administrative Regulations (WAC 365-195) In support of the GMA legislation, state administrative regulations require that the Capital Facilities Plan consist of at least the following features (WAC 365-195-315(1)): 1. An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities. 2. A forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities. 3. The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities. 4. At least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes. 5. A reassessment of the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs... In the administrative regulations, the state recommends that in addition to transportation, concurrency should be sought for domestic water and sanitary sewer systems. (WAC 365-195-060(3)) Additionally, the regulations state that the planning for all elements, including the Capital Facilities Plan, should be undertaken with the goal of economic development in mind even though the Act does not mandate an economic development element for the plan. (WAC 365-195-060(2)) 4 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT GROWTH PROJECTIONS According to the growth projections that form the basis of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the City of Renton will experience an increase of 1,671 single-family households, 6,324 multi-family households, and 27,267 jobs over the twenty-year interval from 1990 to 2010. For the purpose of developing a six-year capital facilities plan for the period from 2001 through 2006, an estimate had to be made as to the amount of the projected 20-year growth that occurred during the initial six year Capital Facilities Element planning cycle. After reviewing the projections and the underlying assumptions, it was determined that for planning purposes, the most prudent course was to maintain the original twenty year (1990 to 2010) employment and household forecasts and to assume a uniform allocation of the remaining projected growth over the 20-year period, rather than trying to predict year by year economic cycles or revising the original forecast. During the first six-year capital facilities planning period, 1995 to 2000, the City of Renton achieved growth of 2,673 households, consisting of 1,129 single-family households, and 1,544 multi-family households. This record compares with the projected growth for the first phase of the planning period of 2,377 households estimated to include 480 single-family households, and 1,897 multi-family households. Total projected household growth was exceeded by 480 households. A greater percentage of growth occurred in single-family households than projected. Expected job growth was 8,180 jobs. Actual job growth over this period was 10,716 jobs. The City's population in April 1, 2001 was 51,140, which exceeds the estimate of 48,456 made at the beginning of the planning cycle. For the purposes of the second phase of the planning cycle, 2001 to 2006 six year Capital Facilities Plan, Renton will plan for the next six-year increment of the remaining target - 3,300 households and 8,180 jobs. The City's population in the year 2006 is anticipated to be 53,837. To be sure, growth will not occur precisely as projected over the next six-year or even the 20-year period. Recognizing this fact, the Capital Facilities Plan should be updated at least biennially. In this way local governments have the opportunity to re-evaluate their forecasts in light of the actual growth experienced, revise their forecasts for the next six years if necessary, and adjust the number and timing of capital facilities that would be needed during the ensuing six-year period. The City performed such a review of the Capital Facilities Plan in 1997 and 2000 and determined that there was not a need to adjust the growth forecast or the number and timing of capital facilities. This conclusion was based on a finding that although actual growth was higher than forecast, in some areas and lower in others the level of service standards were being provided. Subsequent reviews may result in revisions to the growth projections and the number and timing of capital facilities if the actual growth continues to exceed the forecast growth. A major review of the City's Comprehensive Plan is scheduled to occur in 2002. As stated in Policy CFP-1, this Capital Facilities Plan is anticipated to be updated regularly as part of the city's budget process, thereby ensuring that the Plan reflects the most current actual statistics related to growth in Renton, and that capital facilities are slated for implementation in accordance with both the level of service standards and the city's concurrency policy. It is anticipated that the City will fully implement this policy (CFP- 1) in the annual budget process. 5 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN POLICIES Policy CFP-1. The Capital Facilities Plan should be updated on a regular basis as part of the city's budget process, and such update may include adjustments to growth projections for the ensuing six years, to level of service standards, to the list of needed facilities, or to anticipate funding sources. Policy CFP-2. Level of service standards should be established at the current or at a greater level of service for existing facilities within the City of Renton. Policy CFP-3. Adequate public capital facilities should be in place concurrent with development. Concurrent with development shall mean the existence of adequate facilities, strategies or services when development occurs or the existence of a financial commitment to provide adequate facilities, strategies, or services within six years of when development occurs. Policy CFP-4. No deterioration of existing levels of service should occur due to growth, consistent with Policy CFP-3. Policy CFP-5. Funding for new, improved or expanded public facilities or services should come from a mix of sources in order to distribute the cost of such facilities or services according to use, need, and adopted goals and policies. Policy CFP-6. Evaluate levying impact fees on development for municipal services and/or school district services upon the request of the district if a compelling need is established through means such as presentation of an adopted Capital Facilities Plan and demonstration that such facilities are needed to accommodate projected growth. (See the Public Facilities and Annexation Sections of the Land Use Element, the Utilities Element and the Transportation Elements for policies related to this Capital Facilities Plan.) 6 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2006 Inventory of Existing Facilities Figures 7-1 and 7-2 on the following pages indicate the degree to which Renton's transportation system is integrally linked to the regional transportation system. The first exhibit is of the existing street and highway system; the second depicts traffic flows on that system. In Renton perhaps more than in any other jurisdiction in the Puget Sound area, actions relating to the transportation system have local and regional implications. Level of Service Background In recognition of the regional nature of the traffic problems faced by Renton and the basic impossibility of building enough roadway capacity to alleviate traffic congestion, the City of Renton revised its LOS policy in 1995 to emphasize the movement of people, not just vehicles. The LOS policy is based on three premises: . Level of Service (LOS) in Renton is primarily controlled by regional travel demands that must be solved by regional policies and plans; • It is neither economically nor environmentally sound to try to accommodate all desired single occupancy vehicle (SOV) travel; and • The decision-makers for the region must provide alternatives to SOV travel. 7 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT aWOTR^NTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Figure 7-2 Traffic Flow Map 9 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT The LOS policy is based on travel time contours which in turn are based on auto, transit, HOV, non-motorized, and transportation demand management/commute trip reduction measures. The LOS policy is designed to achieve several objectives: • Allow reasonable development to occur; • Encourage a regionally linked, locally oriented, dynamic transportation system; • Meet requirements of the Growth Management Act; • Meet the requirements of the King County Level of Service Framework Policies; » Require developers to pay a fair share of transportation costs; and • Provide flexibility for Renton to adjust its LOS policy if the region decides to lower regional LOS standards by not providing regional facilities. The City of Renton LOS standard is used to evaluate Renton citywide transportation plans. The auto, HOV, and transit measures are based on travel times and distance and are the primary indicators for concurrency. The non- motorized and TDM measures assist in meeting multi-modal goals of Renton and the region. The Level of Service Standard Methodology The following table demonstrates how the LOS policy is applied. A 1990 LOS travel time index has been calculated for the City by establishing the sum of the average 30-minute travel distance for SOV, HOV and Transit as follows: Average PM peak travel distance in 30 minutes from the city in a 1 directions SOV HOV 2 Transit (includes access time) LOS Standard XX miles XX miles 2 times X miles = XX XX City-wide Level of Service Standard (Years 1990 and 2010) The 1990 LOS index is the basis for the 2010 standard. The average SOV 30-minute travel distance is forecast to decrease by 2010. Therefore, SOV improvements will need to be implemented to raise the SOV equivalent or a combination of HOV and/or transit improvements will need to be implemented to raise the HOV and/or transit equivalents to maintain the LOS standard. Renton's Transportation Improvement Plan Arterial, HOV and Transit Sub-Elements have been tested against the above LOS standard to assure that the Plan meets the year 2010 standard. City-wide Level of Service Lndex (Year 1990): Average PM peak travel distance in 30 minutes from the city in all directions SOV HOV 2 Transit (includes access time) LOS Index 18 miles 21 miles 10 49 10 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT City-wide Level of Service Standard (Year 2010): Average PM peak travel distance m 30 minutes from the city in all directions SOV HOV 2 Transit (includes access time) LOS Standard 14 miles 21 miles 14 49 The City of Renton LOS standards are used to evaluate citywide transportation plans. The auto, HOV, and transit measures are based on travel times and distance and are the primary indicators for concurrency. The non- motorized and TDM measures serve as credit toward meeting multi-modal goals of Renton and the region. To check the progress toward the 2010 goal, each year the city will assess the level of service as a part of its annual Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). This assessment will farther ensure that level of service is maintained for the current period as well as for 2010. Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan, 2001-2006 The transportation 6-year facilities plan is based on achieving the desired level of service by the year 2010 through an annual program of consistent and necessary improvements and strategies. Additionally, the plan includes projects such as bridge inspections, street overlay programs, traffic signal maintenance, and safety improvements that are needed as part of the City's annual work program. Projects that promote economic development also are included, as encouraged by the GMA. See Table 7-1 on the following page for the 6-year plan. The first step in developing the 6-year funding plan was to establish a 20-year plan that included arterial, HOV and transit components. This effort resulted in a planning level cost estimate of $134 million. The cost for arterials and HOV are total costs (or Renton's share of the cost of joint projects with WSDOT and local jurisdictions) in 1999 dollars. The transit costs include only the local match for the local feeder system and intermodal stations. Having established a 20-year funding level of $134 million, an annual funding level of $6.7 million was established With this funding level, it is reasonably certain that each year the existing level of service will improve and the desired level of service will be achieved by 2010 as long as the facilities funded each year are consistent with the 20-year plan and transit and HOV facilities are conscientiously emphasized. The funding source projections in Table 7-2 are based upon the 2001-2006 TIP. It was assumed that gas tax and vehicle tax revenues would continue at the current level of $0.67 million per year. Additionally, it was assumed that grant funding would be maintained at the current level that is $3.57 million per year.. Business license fees of $1 89 million per year were based on the current level of $1.80 million per year adjusted to $1.40 million per year to reflect devaluation due to inflation at 4%per year, then adjusted upward to account for employment growth forecasts. The result is a requirement of $0.57 million from mitigation fees. Based on forecasts of total new vehicle trips from development, a mitigation fee of $75 per trip was established. Besides a mitigation fee payment as their fair share contribution toward mitigating cumulative impacts, developers will be required to implement site-specific improvements to ensure that on-site and adjacent facility impacts are mitigated. 11 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 7-1 2001 - 2006 Six-Year TIP Total Project Costs HP Project 7W. Previous Costs 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Period Total Total Cost t Street Overlay Program 1.218,437 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410.000 410,000 2,460.000 3,678,437 2 Oakesdale Ave. SW Phase 1B 625.000 13,000 • -13.000 638,000 1 Oakeidale Ave. SW Pbaie 2 941,650 1558.450 • 1558,450 2500,000 4 M05/NE 44th Interchange 2,355,270 2,830,000 8,400,000 30,500,000 24,400.000 66,130.000 68,485,270 5 Transit Program 383,715 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 600,000 983,715 S North-South Transit Corridor 15.000 15,000 15.000 30,000 7 Walkway Program 1,368.838 170.000 170.000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 1,020,000 2388.838 1 Downtown Transit Access 1.203.757 465,696 465.696 1.669,453 » Transit Priority Signal System 572.000 387.104 387,104 959.104 14 SRH7/SW 27th SU Strander Blvd. 109,894 805,800 950,000 7.945.900 13,703,400 15,650.800 7582,000 46,637,900 46,747.794 11 Grady Way/SR 167 50,000 80.000 470,000 2.100,000 2,150,000 4.800.00O 4,850,000 13 SR1M HOV - 140th to SR900 150,000 372,800 1.100,000 1.877.200 3,150,000 3,300,000 U Duval Ave NE 20.000 80,000 250,000 2,080,000 1,320.000 3.730,000 3,750,000 14 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 378,239 172.000 172,000 172,000 172^00 172.000 172,000 1.032,000 1,410,239 IS Arterial HOV Program 215,355 18.000 140,000 15.000 441,000 300.000 15.000 929.000 1,144355 « Trans-Valley t Soos Creek Corr. 20,000 30.000 30,000 20.000 80,000 100,000 17 Bridge Inspection I Repair 101.202 120,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 701.000 30,000 941,000 1,042202 W TDM Program 145,656 63,250 63750 55,000 55,000 55.000 55,000 346,500 492,156 1* Loop Replacement Program 24,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20.000 120,000 144,000 24 Sign Replacement Program 20,776 15.000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 110.776 XI Uoht Pole Prog. 44.172 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15.000 15,000 90.000 134,172 22 Sunset/Anacorte* Ave NE 291,800 37.500 37300 329300 23 Lake Wash. Bv-Park to Coulcm Pk 750,000 750.000 750,000 24 S. 2nd Street Safety Project 216,375 42500 42,500 258,875 25 Arterial Circulation Program 507.421 250,000 150,000 100,000 250,000 250.000 250.000 1.250,000 1,757,421 2* Project DevetopmemVPredeslgn 276.620 175.000 175.000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1.150,000 1.426,820 27 WSOOT Coordination Program 29.92S 10,000 10.000 10,000 10,000 1O.000 10,000 60,000 89,928 2* M05 HOV Direct Access 35.000 20,000 20,000 55,000 2* City Gateways 76,376 69.300 55,000 55,000 55,000 234,300 310,676 JO Traffic Safety Program 200,114 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40.000 40.000 240,000 440.114 M Traffic Efficiency Program 513.373 30,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 30.000 30,000 180,000 693373 12 Arterial Rehab. Prog. 5,646 150.000 240,000 83.471 55,000 46,335 240,000 814.806 820,452 33 East Valley Rd * SW 43rd Rehab 1.111.100 58,900 58,900 1,170,000 34 Trans Concurrency 10,000 10,000 10.000 10.000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60.000 70,000 35 Missing Unks Program 30.700 30,000 30,000 30.000 30,000 30.000 30,000 180,000 210,700 34 Park-Sunset Corridor 198,000 72,000 528,000 798,000 798,000 37 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 126,577 300,000 10.000 10,000 320,000 446577 3« Interagency Signal Coord. 74372 74572 3* Environmental Monitoring 12,855 38,817 30,000 36.529 30,000 36.665 30,000 202,011 214,866 4* Bicycle Route Dev. Program 47,600 100,000 110,000 18,000 18,000 80.000 80,000 406,000 453,600 41 Rainier Av-SR «7 to S 2nd St 5,000 15,000 15,000 20.000 42 NEJrd / NE 4th Corridor 10,000 224.000 290,000 1,886.000 2,500,000 2510,000 43 CBD Dfke I Pad. Connections 25,000 364,000 946.000 10,000 10.000 10,000 10,000 1J50.000 1375,000 44 Und Av-SW 16th -SW 43rd 60,000 1,914.000 626,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 45 SW 7th St/Und Ave SW 32,000 218,000 250,000 250.000 44 Benson RdS/S31stSt 10,000 10,000 130,000 140,000 150,000 47 VaHey Connections to West 50,000 110,000 1,100,000 1.210,000 1,260.000 44 Oakesdale Ave SW Extension 99,569 60,431 2.753.000 9,399,000 12,212,431 12,312,000 Total Sources 13,724,4*4 17,895,250 47,347,lM 45.745^31 21,104,800 ia,s7«,ooo 161,677,098 175,405,586 12 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 7-2 2001-2006 Six-Year TIP Summary of Funding Sources 13 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT WATER CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2006 Inventory of Existing Facilities Renton's water system provides service to an area of approximately 16 square miles and more than 12,000 customers located in 12 hydraulically-distinct pressure zones. An inventory of the existing capital facilities in the water system is listed in Figure 8-1 and consists of 8 wells and one spring for water supply, eleven booster pump stations, eight reservoirs, water treatment facilities at each source (chlorine and fluoride) and approximately 225 miles of water main in service. In addition, the City maintains one standby well and five metered connections with the City of Seattle (Cedar River and Bow Lake supply pipelines) for emergency back- up supply. Renton supplies water on a wholesale basis to Lakeridge Bryn-Mawr Water District. Level of Service Level of service for Renton's Water Utility is defined by the ability to provide an adequate amount of high quality water to all parts of the distribution system at adequate pressure during peak demand or fire. This ability is determined by the physical condition of the system and the capacity of supply, storage, treatment, pumping and distribution systems. Level of service standards for the water system vary according to the component of the overall system and are determined by the requirements established by local, state, and federal regulations. Water supply is regulated by the Washington State Department of Ecology (water rights), and the Washington State Department of Health (quantity guidelines), water quality is regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Safe Drinking Water Act) and the Washington State Department of Health (primacy over Safe Drinking Water Act), system design and construction requirements are regulated by the Washington State Department of Health. The Water Utility maintains a hydraulic model of the water system. The model incorporates the pipe size and location, booster pumps, and storage to determine the flow and pressure available in each segment of the distribution system. The Utility can evaluate the impact of a specific development on the system using the model. The Water Utility reviews each development in terms of flow, pressure and water supply required. The Water Utility's goal is to provide an adequate supply of potable water under the "worst case" scenario. This scenario considers the following conditions: failure of the largest source of supply, failure of the largest mechanical component, power failure to a single power grid, and/or a reservoir out of service. Under this scenario, the Water Utility strives to meet the following primary requirements: Pressure: Maintain a minimum of 30 pounds per square inch (psi) at the meter during normal demand conditions and a minimum of 20 psi during an emergency. Maximum allowable pressure at the meter during normal demand is 130 psi and a maximum of 150 psi during an emergency Velocity: Under normal demand conditions, the velocity in a transmission main is less than 4 feet per second (fps) and less than 8 fps during an emergency. Supply: The water supply must meet the maximum day demand and replenish storage within 72 hours with the largest source of supply out of service. Storage: Storage volume must be maintained to provide for peak demand and adequate volume for an emergency (fire). Transmission and Distribution: The Water Utility uses design criteria approved by the Washington State Department of Health. Treatment and Monitoring: The Water Utility treats all sources with chlorine and fluoride. Water quality monitoring is conducted as required by the State Department of Health under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The City implements a cross connection control program to prevent cross connections with non potable sources and a wellhead protection program. Fire Flow: Fire flow required by a development is as established in the fire code and can vary from 1000 gallons per minute to 5500 gallons per minute. 14 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan, 2001-2006 Based on the projected growth in population and employment by the year 2006, the existing supply of water will meet the level of service standard. As Table 8-1 indicates, with the addition of Wells 11 and 17, the net capacity of the system is 16.01 million gallons per day, which is adequate to serve a population of 53,440. With the projected population of Renton to be 53,837 in 2006, the existing supply is adequate to serve the anticipated growth. Meeting the fire flow level of service standards will require improvements to the existing water system if the projected commercial and industrial growth occurs. In general, fire flow is adequate to all single family and multi-family areas with the possible exception of portions of downtown, depending on the extent of new multi- family development and the type of construction. Certain areas slated for commercial and industrial growth will need upgrading of the system. Other improvements to the water system will be needed during the first six years of the Comprehensive Plan because of regulatory requirements relating to water quality and efforts to maintain the existing system at the desired level of service. The list of growth-related facilities needed to meet all of the level of service standards and regulatory requirements are in Table 8-2. The funds for the needed facilities are projected to come from a number of sources, including: water utility rates, connection fees, developer extension agreements, low interest loans from state or federal programs, and grants from state and federal agencies. The projected total revenue from all sources for each of the six years in also shown in Table 8-2. 15 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 8-1 On-Line Supply Sources - Existing Water Supply Capacity mum WBbsmBBm- Springbrook Springs 600 0.86 WellRW-1 2,200 3.17 WellRW-2 2,200 3.17 WellRW-3 2,200 3.17 WellRW-5A 1,400 2.02 WellPW-8 3,500 5.04 WellPW-9 1,200 1.73 WellPW-11 2,500 3.60 Well PW-12 1,500 2.16 Well PW-17 1,500 2.16 TOTAL 18,800 GPM 27.07MGD GPM: gallon per minute MGD: million gallons per day Total annual water rights are 14,809 acre-feet per year. 16 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 8-2 Water Capital Facilities 2001-2006- Water Projects Through 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total New Reservoirs and Pvrmp Stations 200,000 3,550,000 3,750,000 Water Supply Development 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 Emergency Power Supply to Wells and Pump Stations 500,000 500,000 400,000 1,400,000 Total 510,000 510,000 610,000 3,550,000 5,180,000 Oper Rev/Bonds 1,165,000 1,605,000 1,205,000 1,205,000 5,180,000 wr .— Licenses and Fees Other Taxes Grants Loans Not Funded Total 1,165,000 1,605,000 1,205,000 1,205,000 5,180,000 17 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT WASTEWATER CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2006 Inventory of Existing Facilities Renton's sanitary sewer system consists of about 153 miles of gravity sewers, 23 lift stations with associated force mains, and approximately 3,000 manholes. Wastewater is discharged to regional facilities at 55 locations within the service area. The locations of Renton's sewer interceptors and lift stations, as well as Metro's sewer lines, are shown in Figure 9-1. The City's Wastewater Utility serves approximately 10,300 customers, which includes approximately eighty percent of the city's population and seventy percent of the city's land area. The remaining twenty percent of the population currently utilizes private, on-site wastewater disposal systems, typically septic system, while the balance of the land area either utilizes private systems or remains undeveloped. With a few exceptions, the capacity of the existing facilities is adequate to handle the current demand. The exceptions are the May Creek Basin where wastewater is diverted into the Lake Washington East Basin causing an overload of that system and the West Renton Sub-basin where sections of sewer lines experience problems during peak wet weather events. Level of Service Level of service for Renton's Wastewater Utility is defined by the ability to move sewage from the point of origin, the customer, to the treating agency, Metro, in a safe and efficient manner. This ability is determined by the physical condition of Renton's system and the capacity available in the system. It is the Renton Wastewater Utility's responsibility to maintain the system in a safe condition and monitor the standards for new construction. The Wastewater Utility is also responsible for ensuring that capacity exists in the system prior to new connections or that the capacity is created as part of the new development. The level of service for Renton's Wastewater Utility is developed through coordination with and subject to the policies, design criteria, and standards used for planning and operating a sanitary sewer system as established by the laws and policies of several agencies. Those agencies, in order by authority, are the Department of Ecology (Criteria for Sewage Works Design), Metro (King County Department of Metropolitan Services), and the City of Renton. The Wastewater Utility maintains a model of the sewer system. The model uses the size, type, and slope of the pipes to determine the capacity of the each component of the system. Because the slope of pipes can change segment to segment and flows may be merging at *branches' the capacity of the system may change block by block It is, therefore, not feasible to provide a standard statement on the capacity available m Renton's sewer system. Renton's Wastewater Utility reviews available capacity on a project-by-project level and plans for long- range capacity based upon the ultimate development of the adopted land use. The Wastewater Utility's goal is to have sufficient capacity to handle what the Utility considers the 'worst case scenario'. That is, the amount of waste if everybody was discharging their highest amount at the same time and the system was experiencing the highest amount of inflow and infiltration anticipated. 19 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT For existing and projected development Renton uses the following criteria for flow projection: Average Single Family Domestic Flow 192 gallons per day per unit Average Multi-Family Domestic Flow 176 gallons per day per unit Light Industrial 2800 gallons per acre per day Heavy Industrial site specific Commercial 2800 gallons per acre per day Office 2800 gallons per acre per day Recreation 300 gallons per acre per day Public 600 gallons per acre per day Manufacturing Park 2800 gallons per acre per day Peak Infiltration 700 gallons per acre per day Peak Inflow 600 gallons per acre per day Peaking factor for system average 2.0 X Depth to Diameter Ratio 0.70 (seven tenths) The criteria listed above are based upon Table IV-5 of the 1992 Long Range Wastewater Management Plan. This criterion is subject to change based upon the latest adopted Long Range Wastewater Management Plan or amendments thereto. These flows are averages used as standards. Actual design flows may vary considerably, depending upon land use. The Wastewater Utility will consider verifiable alternate design flows that may be submitted. If Renton's sewer system has the capacity to handle the flows projected, based upon the above criteria, or a developer improves the system to provide the capacity, the project achieves concurrence with the Wastewater Utility's level of service. Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan, 2001-2006 Based on the forecasted growth in population and employment over the next 20 years, daily wastewater flows are predicted to increase by about 1.94 million gallons per day (mgd.) This increase is expected to place a strain on the entire system, with the greatest problems expected to occur in the Black River basin. In order to maintain the desired level of service and accommodate the projected growth, facility improvements will be needed in this basin over the next six years. Another factor affecting level of service is the age of the existing system. A significant portion of the city's wastewater collection and conveyance system is over fifty years old. Some of these mains cannot be relied upon to provide the desired level of service without major repair and/or replacement. Consequently, another component of the six-year facility plan is the repair and replacement of the existing system in order to maintain the current level of service. Some of the geographic areas in which these mains are located will experience more growth than will others, but facility improvements will be needed regardless. It is currently the policy of the Wastewater Utilities that all parcels connecting to the sewer system pay for their fair share of the system. This is accomplished in a combination of three methods: 1. Local Improvement Districts may be formed with the city installing the sewers using LID bonds encumbering the participating parcels; 2. The Wastewater Utility may front the cost of new sewers and hold Special Assessment Districts against benefiting parcels; and 20 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT 3. Developers or potential users will front the cost of extending the main with the ability to hold a latecomer agreement against the other parcels that potentially benefit. Projects that replace and rehabilitate the existing system, as well as operation and maintenance costs, will be funded through rates paid by existing customers. Existing sewer customers will not be required to participate in Special Assessment District fees, latecomer fees, or local improvement districts unless they redevelop or increase the density on their property. Table 9-1 below lists the projects needed along with the sources of funds for them for the period 2001-2006 based upon the six-year growth projections and the desired level of wastewater service. Table 9-1 Wastewater Capital Facilities 2001-2006 Wastewater Projects 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Sanitary Sewer Main Extension 800,000 600,000 800,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total Sources of Funds: Oper Rev/Bonds 800,000 600,000 800,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Licenses and Fees Other Taxes Grants Loans Not Funded Total 800,000 600,000 800,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 21 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Fig. 9-1 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Lines 22 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT SURFACE WATER UTILITY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2006 Inventory of Existing Facilities The City of Renton is composed of various drainage basins and sub-basins. The major basins within the existing City limits include the East Lake Washington, West Lake Washington, May Creek, Lower Cedar River and Black River basins. The City of Renton is located at the outlet end of a majority of these basins that discharge into either the Green/Duwamish River or into Lake Washington. The Surface Water Utility's service area within the existing City corporate boundaries is approximately 16 square miles. The existing surface water system includes rivers, streams, ditches, swales, lakes, wetlands, detention facilities (pond and piped systems), water quality swales, wetponds, wetvaults, oil/water separators, coalescing plate oil/water separators, pipes, catch basins, manholes, outfalls and pump stations. The natural surface water systems (rivers, streams, lakes and wetlands) are shown on Renton's Critical Area Maps. A majority of the water quantity and quality facilities are privately owned and maintained on-site as required in accordance with the Renton Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance (RMC Chapter 22, Section 4-22). The Surface Water Utility owns, maintains and operates all storm and surface water management facilities located within public right-of-ways and easements dedicated for storm and surface water management purposes. The Utility currently owns, operates and maintains approximately 100 miles of storm pipe systems including 7,059 catch basins, 1,629 manholes, 13 detention facilities and 11.5 miles of ditch systems. A combination of the public and some of the private storm system is shown in the Surface Water Utility Storm System Inventory Maps and Attributes data base which is too large to present here. Level of Service Background The Surface Water Utility's policies, design criteria, and standards used for planning, engineering, operating and maintaining the storm and surface water systems are based upon requirements that originate from many sources. Together, these regulations define the acceptable level of service for surface water. The primary Federal, State and local agencies and regulations which affect the City of Renton's level of service standard for surface and storm water systems are listed below: 1. Federal Agencies/Regulations: a. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): i. Federal Clean Water Act ii. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit) b. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) i. Nationwide/404 Individual Permit Requirements ii. Federal Emergency Management Act standards 23 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT 2. State Agencies/Regulations: a. Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDOE): i. Stormwater Discharge Permits (NPDES). ii. Temporary Water Quality Modification Permits iii. Water Quality Certification Permits iv. Coastal Zone Management Consistency Permit v. Shoreline Management Program (SMP) vi. The Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan b. Washington State Department of Fisheries and Wildlife (WSDFW) i. Hydraulic Project Approval Permits 3. Local Agencies/Regulations a. Cedar River Basin Plan b. May Creek Basin Plan c. Green River Basin Plan d. Green River Flood Control Zone District/Green River Basin Program e. King County Surface Water Design Manual as adapted by Renton Level of Service Standard in Renton The Surface Water Utility level of service is the adopted surface water design standards which are consistent with the above referenced federal, state and local regulations as specified in the City of Renton Storm and Surface Water Drainage ordinance (RMC 4-22). New surface water management systems are designed to accommodate the future land use condition runoff based upon the city's land use element and the future land use plans of neighboring jurisdictions. The standards specified in the city-adopted portions of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual require that: 1. Post-development peak rate of runoff be controlled to the pre-developed peak rate of runoff up to the 10-year design storm; 2. Water quality facility "Best Management Practices" (BMP's) such as biofiltration, wetponds, coalescing plate oil/water separators and erosion control measures be used; 3. Pipe systems be designed to convey the 25 -year post-developed design storm without overflowing the system and pipe conveyance systems have adequate capacity to convey the 100-year design storm provided that the runoff is contained within defined conveyance system elements without inundating or over topping the crown of a roadway; and/or no portions of a building will be flooded; and/or if overland sheet flow occurs, it will flow through a drainage easement. 4. New drainage ditches or channels be designed to convey at least the peak runoff from the 100-year design storm without over-topping. Projects that comply with the above-cited standards will achieve an acceptable level of service for surface water management purposes within the City of Renton. Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan, 2001-2006 The capital facilities estimated to be needed to solve current surface water management problems and to prevent future surface water management problems associated with the growth projected for the first six years of the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed sources of funding are listed in Table 10-1. The sources of revenues to be utilized by the Surface Water Utility to implement the needed capital improvements include the following: 24 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT 1. Surface Water Utility rates; 2. Permit fees and system development charges; 3. Revenue bonds; 4. Private latecomers agreements; 5. Surface Water Utility Special Assessment Districts; 6. Low interest loans (state revolving funds, Public Works Trust Fund); 7. Cost-sharing interlocal agreements with adjacent jurisdictions and special districts; 8. Army Corps of Engineers - Section 205 Small Flood Control Projects Program and other financial assistance programs available to municipalities authorized by Congress; 9. USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Watershed Flood Prevention and Protection Act (Public Law 566) and other SCS programs; 10. Grants from state and federal agencies such as: a. Washington State Department of Ecology Centennial Clean Water Fund; b. Washington State Department of Community Development Flood Control Assistance Account Program; c. Washington State legislative appropriations approved for Special Surface Water Utility proj ects (Cedar River Delta proj ect); 11. Other unidentified federal, state and local grant programs. As is evident in Table 10-1 on the following page, the Surface Water Utility proposes to use all or any combination of the financial sources to fund the needed capital facilities. 25 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 10-1 Surface Water Utility Capital Facilities 2001-2006 Surface Water Projects Through 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2001 Wetland Mitigation Bank 75,000 100,000 1,300,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Storm System Improvement 2,155,000 1,200,000 900,000 850,000 1,650,000 450,000 Springbrook Creek Improvements 50,000 1,350,000 150,000 900,000 200,000 400,000 Total 2,280,000 2,650,000 2,350,000 1,760,000 1,860,000 860,000 Sources of Funds: Oper. Rev. Bonds 2,280,000 2,650,000 2,350,000 1,760,000 1,860,000 860,000 Licenses and Fees Other Taxes Grants Loans Not Funded Total 2,280,000 2,650,000 2,350,000 1,760,000 1,860,000 860,000 26 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2006 Inventory of Existing Facilities The City of Renton is the primary provider of park and recreation services within the city limits. These services include parks, indoor facilities, open space areas and recreation programs. Other suppliers that provide facilities and services include the Renton School District and several private enterprises. Table 11-1 below is a summary of the amount of park and open space area provided by the City of Renton; provided by others within the City's Proposed Annexation Area (PAA) and the total for the overall Planning Area. Table 11-1 Park and Open Space Areas Summary Type of Facility Renton PAA Planning Area Total iiHmJiniirin i • — Neighborhood Parks 88.84 22.70 111.54 ~ — Community Parks 109.51 90.00 199.51 Regional Parks 55.33 0.00 55.33 Onen Space Areas 642.46 236.00 878.46 • 1 ——— — Linear Parks & Trails 91.21 0.00 91.21 Special Use Parks & Facilities 192.60 0.00 192.60 TOTAL 1,179.95 348.70 1,528.65 Tables 11-2 and 11-3 on the following pages list the individual park and open space areas that comprise the categories summarized above. Table 11-2 details Renton's Parks and Open Spaces by category and Table 11-3 lists public land in Renton's PAA. The table lists the name of each park or open space, its size in acres, and its status as of January 2001. The locations of the individual park facilities listed in Table 11-2 are shown in Figure 11-1 which immediately follows the Table. 27 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 11-2 Public Park and Open Space Areas in Renton Detailed Listing Park Acres Status Neighborhood Parks (17) Earlington Park 1.54 Developed Glencoe Park .42 Developed Heather Downs Park 4.30 Undeveloped Highlands Park 10.40 Developed Jones Park 1.18 Developed Kennydale Lions Park 5.66 Developed Kiwanis Park 9.00 Developed Maplewood Park 2.20 Developed Maplewood Roadside Park 1.00 Developed North Highlands Park 2.64 Developed Philip Arnold Park 10.00 Developed Sunset Court 0.50 Developed Talbot Hill Reservoir 2.50 Developed Thomas Teasdale Park 10.00 Developed Tiffany Park 7.00 Developed Watershed Park 16.00 Undeveloped Windsor Hill Park 4.50 Developed TOTAL 88.84 Acres Cornmunitv Parks (9) Cedar River Park 23.07 Developed Kennydale Beach 1.76 Developed Liberty Park 11.89 Developed Narco Property 15.00 Undeveloped Piazza & Gateway 0.8 Developed Riverview Park 11.50 Developed Ron Regis Park 45.00 Developed Tonkins Park 0.29 Developed Veterans Memorial Park 02 Part. Developed TOTAL 109.51 Acres Regional Parks (1) Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park 55.33 Developed TOTAL 55.33 Acres Open Space Areas (9) Black River Riparian Forest 90.00 Undeveloped Cedar River Natural Area 251.98 Undeveloped Cleveland Property 23.66 Undeveloped Lake Street 1.00 Undeveloped May Creek/McAskill 10.00 Undeveloped May Creek Greenway 29.82 Undeveloped Panther Creek Wetlands 73.00 Undeveloped Renton Wetlands 125.00 Undeveloped Springbrook Watershed 38.00 Undeveloped TOTAL 642.46 Acres 28 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Linear Parks & Trails Burnett Linear Park Cedar River Trail Honey Creek Trail Springbrook Trail TOTAL Special Use Parks & Facilities (6) Boathouse Carco Theatre Highlands Neighborhood Center Maplewood Golf Course/Restaurant/Pro Shop North Highlands Neighborhood Center Renton Cornmunity Center Renton Senior Activity Center TOTAL CITY-WIDE TOTAL 1.00 Developed 42.48 Developed 35.73 12.00 91.21 Acres 4,242.00 Developed 11,095.00 s.f. 310 seats 11,906.00 s.f. Developed 15,508.00 s.f. Developed 4,432.00 s.f. Developed 38,000.00 s.f. Developed 22,151.00 s.f. Developed 192.6 Acres 1,179.95 Acres 29 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 11-3 Public park and open space areas in Renton's Proposed Annexation Areas (PAAs) Detailed Listing Maplewood Community Park Site 40.0 Acres Petrovitsky Park 50.0 Acres Sub-Total (Community Parks) 90.0 Acres Sierra Heights Park 4.7 Acres Maplewood Park 4.8 Acres Cascade Park 10.7 Acres Lake Youngs Park 2.5 Acres Sub-Total (Neighborhood Parks) 22.7 Acres May Creek Greenway Renton Park Metro Waterworks Maplewood Heights Soos Creek Greenway 150.0 Acres 19.0 Acres 10.0 Acres 5.0 Acres 52.0 Acres Undeveloped Developed Developed Developed Developed Developed Sub-Total (Open Space) 236.0 Acres Total, Public Park and Open Space Within Renton's Proposed Annexation Areas 348.7 Acres In addition to the park and open space areas, the city operates a number of specialized facilities an ongoing component of the total recreational services it provides. Table 11-4 which follows lists the specialized facilities owned by the city as well as those specialized public facilities within the city limits that are owned by others. 30 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 11-4 Specialized Facilities within the Renton City Limits Number Facility Comments Ballfields City-owned: 1 Cedar River Park 1 Highlands Park 1 Kennydale Lions Park 1 Kiwanis Park 2 Liberty Park 2 lighted 1 Maplewood Park Small Field 1 Ron Regis Lighted 1 Philip Arnold Park Lighted 1 Thomas Teasdale Park 1 Tiffany Park TOTAL 11 FIELDS Within the city limits but owned by others: 2 Hazen High School 2 Highlands Elementary School Small Fields 1 Hillcrest School Small Field 4 Honeydew Elementary School Small Fields- 3 McKnight Middle School 4 Nelson Middle School Small Fields 4 Renton High School 1 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 Tiffany Park Elementary TOTAL 22 FIELDS Number Facility Comments Football/Soccer Fields City -owned: 1 Cedar River Park 1 Highlands Park 1 Kennydale Lions Park 1 Kiwanis Park 1 Philip Arnold Park 1 lighted 1 Ron Regis Park 1 lighted 1 Thomas Teasdale Park 1 Tiffany Park TOTAL 8 FIELDS Within the city limits but owned by others: 1 Hillcrest School 2 Honeydew Elementary School 1 Kennydale Elementary 1 McKnight Middle School 1 Renton High School 1 Renton Stadium 1 lighted TOTAL 7 FIELDS 31 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Tennis Courts City-owned: 2 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Highlands Park Kiwanis Park Liberty Park North Highlands Park Philip Arnold Park Talbot Hill Reservoir Tiffany Park TOTAL Within the city limits but owned by others: 4 Hazen High School McKnight Middle School Nelson Middle School Renton High School TOTAL Swimming Pools Within the city limits but owned by others: 1 Hazen High School TOTAL 2 2 3 1 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 lighted 3 lighted 2 lighted 17 COURTS 15 COURTS Indoor 1POOL Level of Service Standards for park and recreation levels of service were first established nationally based on "Standard Demand" and have been modified at state and local levels to meet local needs. The national level of service (LOS) standards were established by committees of recreation professionals based on practical experience in the field, and are felt to be most useful in quantifiable terms, i.e. acres of park land per population served. The most recognized standards are those developed by the National Recreation Park Association (NRPA). In 1983 that organization published a report titled "Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards" that is well recognized in the recreation field. The Park CFP establishes a 2-tiered approach: 1) an overall LOS standard based on total population and total acreage; and 2) LOS standards for individual neighborhoods and for specific types of parks and facilities within parks. The overall LOS is a gauge of whether the City is meeting overall concurrence for GMA. The second tier identifies areas where deficiencies exist so the City can target it's funds to eliminate those deficiencies while still maintaining overall LOS. The overall LOS standard for park and open space land established for Renton in its Comprehensive Park Recreation and Open Space plan is 27.8 acres/1,000 population. The current LOS in Renton is 24.4 acres/1,000 population. The current LOS within Renton's Potential Annexation Areas (PAA's) is only 6.9 acres/1,000, which reduces today's overall Planning Area LOS to 15.5 acres/1,000. Continued acquisition of park and open space lands will be needed as the City's residential growth continues within its existing boundaries, and as it expands into its underserved PAA's. The recommended service levels for Renton were developed after discussions with City staff and the Park and Recreation Advisory Committee. They are based on participation ratios by which a community can estimate in quantifiable terms the number of acres or facilities required to meet 32 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT the population demand. Attaching a standard to a population variable makes it easy to forecast future needs as the population grows. The table below identifies the current overall LOS in Renton and within Renton's planning area. Table 1 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) - OVERALL Park & Open Space Land Existing Population LOS (Acres/1,000) City of Renton 1,179.95 48,270 24.4 Renton's PAA's 348.70 50,600 6.9 Total Planning Area 1,528.65 98,870 15.5 Starting below, existing service levels and recommended standards by park types within Renton are given. Each park type compares the NRPA Standard to the existing service levels and the recommended standards. This information is provided to indicate how Renton's current level of service compares to national and local standards. The table below summarizes this information, with detail provided on the following pages. Table 2 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) - BY PARK TYPE Figures shown are in acres/1,000 population NRPA Standard City of Renton Renton's PAA's Planning Area Recommended Standard Neighborhood Parks 1-2 1.8 0.4 1.1 1.2 Community Parks 5-8 2.3 1.8 2.0 1.1 Regional Parks 5-10 1.1 0 0.6 11.1 Open Space — 13.3 4.7 8.9 12.7 Linear Parks & Trails — 1.9 0 0.9 0.9 Special Parks & Facilities --4.0 0 1.9 0.8 Total Park & Open Space Land 15-20 24.4 6.9 15.5 27.8 LOS = (Existing Park Land) 4- (Existing Population) 1,000 33 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Park and Open Space Areas 1. Neighborhood Parks Definition: Neighborhood parks are small park areas (usually 2-10 acres in size) utilized for passive use and unstructured play. They often contain an open space for field sports, a children's playground, a multi-purpose paved area, a picnic area and a trail system. For heavily wooded sites, the amount of active use area is substantially reduced. NRPA Standard 1-2 Acres/1,000 Population Existing LOS (Renton): 1.8 Acres/1,000 Population Existing LOS (Planning Area) 1.1 Acres/1,000 Population Recommended LOS Standard: 1.2 Acres/1,000 Population Comments: The recommended standard reflects the shifting emphasis on larger parks and open space recreational opportunities that cost less to maintain and operate than do neighborhood parks. 2. Community Parks Definition: Corrimuriity parks are traditionally larger sites that can accommodate organized play and contain a wider range of facilities. They usually have sport fields or other major use facilities as the central focus of the park. In many cases, they will also serve the neighborhood park function. Community parks generally average 10-25 acres in size with a substantial portion of them devoted to active use. Sometimes, smaller sites with a singular purpose that maintain a community-wide focus can be considered community parks. NRPA Standard: 5-8 acres/1,000 population Existing LOS (Renton): 2.5 acres/1,000 population Existing LOS (Planning Area): 2.0 acres/1,000 population Recommended LOS Standard: 1.1 acres/1,000 population Comments: The low existing ratio reflects a past emphasis within Renton on neighborhood parks. While the recommended standard is well below the NRPA standard, it represents a shifting emphasis on community parks. 34 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT 3. Regional Parks Definition: Regional parks are large park areas that serve geographical areas that stretch beyond the community. They may serve a single purpose or offer a wide range of facilities and activities. In many cases they also contain large areas of undeveloped open space. Many regional parks are acquired because of unique features found or developed on the site. NRPA Standard: 5-10 acres/1,000 population Existing LOS (Renton: 1 • 1 acres/1,000 population Existing LOS (Planning Area): 0.6 acres/1,000 population Recommended Standard: 11.1 acres/1,000 population Comments: Renton has the potential for developing another regional park located in the Cedar River corridor. The recommended standard of 11.1 acres per 1,000 population recognizes the potential for creating a Cedar River Regional Park consisting of the following Special Use Parks: Cedar River Park, Maplewood Roadside Park, Maplewood Golf Course, and the Cedar River Property. With these parks shifted to the Regional Park category, the existing ratio is much closer to the recommended standard than the above ratio indicates. 4. Open Space Areas Definition: This type of park area is defined as general open space, trail systems, and other undeveloped natural areas that includes stream corridors, ravines, easements, steep hillsides or wetlands. Often they are acquired to protect an environmentally sensitive area or wildlife habitats. In other cases they may be drainage corridors or heavily wooded areas. Sometimes trail systems are found m these areas. Existing LOS (Renton) 13.3 acres/1,000 Population Existing LOS (Planning Area): 8.9 acres/1,000 Population Recommended LOS Standard: 12.7 acres/1,000 Population Comments: The recommended LOS Standard of 12.7 acres per 1,000 population represents an increase over the present situation, as several additional open space systems have been identified for preservation. A majority of this type of land is wetlands, steep slopes, or otherwise not suitable for recreational development. 5. Linear Parks Definition: Linear parks are open space areas, landscaped areas, trail systems and other land that generally follow stream corridors, ravines or other elongated features, such as a street, railroad or power line easement. This type of park area usually consists of open space with development being very limited. Trail systems are often a part of this type of area. Existing LOS (Renton): 1.9 acres/1,000 Population Existing LOS (Planning Area): 0.9 acres/1,000 Population 35 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Recommended Standard: 0.9 acres/1,000 Population Comments: The majority of linear park land is found along the banks of the Cedar River and Honey Creek. There are other opportunities for linear parks utilizing utility corridors. 6. Special Use Parks and Facilities Definition: Specialized parks and facilities include areas that generally restrict public access to certain times of the day or to specific recreational activities. The golf course and major structures are included in this category. Existing LOS (Renton): 4.0 acres/1,000 Population Existing LOS (Planning Area): 1.9 acres/1,000 Population Recommended Standards: 0.8 acres/1,000 Population 7. Total Park Land Presently, Renton has 1,179.95 acres of total park land within the city boundaries. Together with another 348.7 acres of public park and open space land within Renton's PAA's (Potential Annexation Areas), the total amount of park and open space land within Renton's planning area is 1,528.65 acres. NRPA Standard: 15-20 acres/1,000 Population Existing LOS (Renton): 24.4 acres/1,000 Population Existing LOS (Planning Area): 15.5 acres/1,000 Population Recommended LOS Standard: 27.8 acres/1,000 Population Comments: While the recommended standard of 27.8 acres per 1,000 population seems very high, most of the acreage is in the open space category. Most of this land is undevelopable as steep hillsides, wetlands or environmentally sensitive areas and will come to the City through the land development process. Specialized Facilities Below are the recommended levels of service for specialized recreation facilities. In addition to the NRPA standard and the existing facility ratio, an estimate of the participation level in Renton compared to the average for the Pacific Northwest is also provided. The existing inventory includes city-owned facilities as well as those facilities within the city limits owned by other public entities. 1. Ballfields (Includes baseball and softball fields) NRPA Standard: 1 field per 2,500 population Existing Participation: Existing Inventory: Existing Facility Ratio: Recommended Standard: * Small fields were excluded Average 20 fields * 1 field per 2,423 population 1 field per 2,000 population purposes of evaluation. for 36 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT 2. Soccer Fields NRPA Standard: Existing Participation: Existing Inventory: Existing Facility Ratio: Recommended Standard: 1 field per 10,000 population 75 % below average 15 fields 1 field per 3,230 population 1 field per 3,000 population Comments Because of the extremely high existing facility ratio and the below average participation rate, tl recommended standard-while substantially above the NRPA standard—is roughly the same as the existing facility ratio. 3. Tennis Courts NRPA Standard: 1 court per 2,000 population Existing Participation: 15 % below average Existing Inventory: 32 courts Existing Facility Ratio: 1 court per 1,514 population Recommended Standard: 1 court per 1,500 population Comments Based on the substantially above average existing facility ratio, the recommended standard is equivalent to the existing facility ratio. 4. Swimming Pools (indoor) NRPA Standard: Existing Participation: Existing Inventory: Existing Facility Ratio: Recommended Standard: 1 pool per 20,000 population Average 1 indoor pool 1 pool per 43,000 population 1 pool per 20,000 population Comments The recommended standard would place Renton at the NRPA standard. 5. Walking Trails Existing Participation: Existing Inventory: Existing Facility Ratio: Recommended Standard: 16% above average 7.5 miles (off-street) .15 miles per 1,000 population .20 miles per 1,000 population Comments The recommended standard reflects a strong local interest in walking trails and the fact that city directed its efforts to other areas until recent years. 37 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan, 2001-2006 Table 11-4 on the following page shows the projects which may need to be begun over the next six years to achieve the recommended level of service standards if the projected growth -and therefore, demand - occurs. The Table also includes potential funding sources for each project, where known. Table 11 - 5 Parks Capital Facilities 2001-2006 Park Projects 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Regis Park Athletic Field Expansion 400,000 400,000 Heather Downs Development. 50,000 500,000 New Maintenance Facility 40,000 500,000 300,000 Grant Matching Fund 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Carr Road Acquisition 550,000 Family Aquatic Center. 200,000 5,000,000 Cedar River Trail Extension 100,000 1,100,000 Golf Course 120,000 40,000 100,000 100,000 800,000 TOTAL 1,170,000 2,030,000 1,000,000 1,400,000 1,700,000 5,400,000 General Fund 300,000 1,290,000 700,000 900,000 700,000 200,000 Licenses and Fees* 670,000 40,000 100,000 100,000 800,000 Other Taxes 200,000 Grants 200,000 700,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Loans Not Funded 5,000,000 TOTAL 1,170,000 2,030,000 1,000,000 1,400,000 1,700,000 5,400,000 •Includes Parks Mitigation Fees in 2001 and Golf Course fees to fund Golf Course Capital Improvements. 38 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2006 Inventory of Existing Facilities The City of Renton provides police, municipal court, and jail services and facilities as part of its public safety responsibilities. Currently, all of these services and facilities are located on the city hall campus. Level of Service The police department has a total of 120 employees. Based on Renton's 2000 population of 48,270, the current level of service of police department employees to population is nearly 2.5 employees per 1,000 residents. The current level of service for officers is nearly 1.75 officers per 1,000 residents. With the population of Renton projected to grow to over 56,534 residents by the year 2006, the number of police department employees will have to increase to 140 to maintain the current level of service. It is also projected by the police department that with an increase in the general population would come an increase in the number of class I, II, and in crimes and a related increase in the number of court cases and jail days and in the size of the average daily jail population. To maintain the current level of service for both the municipal court and the jail would require an increase in the staff at those facilities. Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan, 2001-2006 At the August 1999 meeting of the Valley Communications Board the mayors of the five owner cities (Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, and Tukwila) agreed to build a new 911 Center at a cost of $15,405,519. The Board has been collecting a surcharge on calls for the past two years for construction of a new facility. The net costs, with an assumption that a new dispatch system is not needed, will be $12,571,343. Each member city will be responsible for approximately $2.5 million of the construction costs. As of September 1999, the estimated annual costs of the debt will be approximately $300,000 over 20 years. In the Capital Facilities Plan this cost is divided evenly between the Police and Fire Departments. Table 12-1 Valley Communications Center* $150,000 $150,000 150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Total $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Functions. 39 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT FIRE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2006 Inventory of Existing Facilities The Renton Fire Department provides fire protection services from five locations: Station 11 which is the main fire station across from Historic City Hall and serves the central part of the city; Station 12 which is located in Renton Highlands and serves the north and east portions of the city; and Station 13 which is located in the Talbot Hill area and serves the southeast portion of the city. Station 14 is located at Lind & S. 19* Street and serves the South portion of Renton. Additionally, King County Fire District 25 operationally is part of the Renton fire protection system; it serves the east portion of the city as well as portions of King County. Figure 13-1 on the following page shows the locations of the fire stations. Currently Station 11 is staffed by 9 personnel and is equipped with one engine company, one ladder company, one aid car and one command car. Station 12 is staffed by 5 personnel and is equipped with one engine company and one aid car. Station 13 is staffed by three personnel and one engine company and one aid unit. Station 14 is staffed by three personnel and equipped with an engine and 1 aid unit. The City's water system is also a critical component of fire protection service. Currently all areas of the city are served by the city water system. Level of Service Historically, level of service for fire suppression has been measured in a variety of qualitative and quantitative terms. However, in the city's Fire Department Master Plan (1987) the primary level of service criteria were response time and fire flow. Response time is an important criterion for level of service because there is a direct relationship between how long a fire bums and the temperatures created by the fire. Eventually temperatures become so high that "flashover" occurs, a process in which all combustible material in a room or building ignites simultaneously. Reaching a fire before flashover occurs is an important consideration in fire suppression. Studies have shown that under normal dispatching procedures fire crews have about four to six minutes to reach a fire before flashover occurs. Fire flow is the second criterion for measuring the level of service for fire suppression. Fire flow refers to the amount of water that is available to spray on a fire and extinguish it. Understandably, water is an essential element for fire suppression, and the hotter a fire, the more water that must be available to extinguish it. Determining what is adequate fire flow depends upon a building's type of construction, floor area, and use. For example, adequate fire flow in the city's water system for a single-family wood frame house is 1,000 gallons per minute (gpm) whereas adequate fire flow for a shopping center or an industrial park is approximately 4,500 gpm. The third aspect of establishing level of service is personnel. Having trained firefighters in sufficient numbers is crucial to putting out a fire safely and efficiently. The number and training of firefighters also must fit with the department's strategic or tactical approach to fighting fires. The Renton fire department uses an aggressive attack strategy as opposed to a defensive approach strategy. 40 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT In its Fire Department Master Plan, the City established the following standards for level of service: 1. Acceptable response time is defined as having the first responding units arrive on the fire scene in five minutes or less. 2. Acceptable response time is defined as having the second responding units arrive on the fire scene in ten minutes or less. 3. Acceptable fire flow is defined as having water available to all parts of the city in sufficient quantity and pressure to extinguish the worst-case fire in an existing or projected land use. 4. Acceptable personnel is defined as having five firefighters on site in first response and ten firefighters on site in second response. 5. Acceptable personnel is also defined as having sufficient personnel available through mutual aid and automatic response agreements with neighboring jurisdictions to efficiently and successfully extinguish the larger and more complex fires in residential, commercial, institutional and industrial buildings. Needed Capital Facilities and Funding Plan, 2001-2006 With the exception of a few isolated small areas of the city, the "five firefighters in five minutes" level of service standard is being met. With regard to the "ten firefighters in ten minutes" level of service standard, this standard is being met in virtually the entire city. Similarly, the adequate fire flow level of service standard is being met city-wide. Generally, fire flows are'adequate throughout the city, a long-range water system plan is being implemented to upgrade the few low fire flow areas, and development standards and review procedures are in place which require that necessary fire suppression measures are made available for all new construction. Given the population and employment growth projected for the year 2006, it is anticipated that some actions may be needed over the next six years to maintain the response time level of service standards. In the east Renton area the agreement with Fire District 25 whereby the city has assumed operational control of that facility coupled with Station 12 and the water system plan for the area should assure that both response time and fire flow standards will be maintained. In the Kennydale area a new station 15 will be constructed over the next six years. The station will be staffed with three firefighters, seven days a week. This means an additional fifteen firefighters along with the purchase of equipment. The total project includes the purchase of land, design, construction, hiring personnel, and purchase of equipment. Presently the northerly portion of the area is within the ten-minute response time standard but outside of the five-minute response time standard for Station 12. As pointed out in the Fire Department Master Plan, a new station 15 closer to 1-405 and 44th would provide five-minute response time coverage to the entire area. Over the next six years, some single family and multi-family growth is projected for the Kennydale/Highlands area, as is some employment growth. This growth would increase somewhat the importance of providing improved service to the area in the near term. Given the residential and employment growth projected for the area after the year 2006, the importance of taking actions to improve the five-minute response time coverage increase substantially during that period. The solution recommended in the Fire Master Plan is to relocate station 12 further to the east. Along with the building of Station 15, the City will rebuild Station 12 to the east to 41 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT better serve the growing Highlands area. This project includes purchasing land, design, and construction. The valley industrial area is the area most in need of a new facility. While much of the area is within both the five-minute and ten-minute response times for Stations 11 and 13, projected employment and multi-family growth for the area indicates an additional facility is needed. Adding to the need for a new facility is the fact that Station 13 has physical limitations in terms of its ability to accommodate the necessary equipment and personnel to maintain the current level of service standards as growth occurs. Station 13 was built as a temporary facility, until a decision was made whether to build a new station or collocate with District 40. With the decision not to collocate a station, the need for a new facility is apparent. The project includes design and construction only. Table 13-1 Fire Capital Facilities 2001-2006 Fire Projects 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Station 15 950,000 1,500,000 Station 12 1,150,000 1,500,000 Station 13 1,600,000 Valley Communications Center 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total 2,250,000 150,000 3,150,000 1,750,000 150,000 150,000 Sources of Funds: General Fund 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Licenses and Fees Bonds Grants Other Taxes 2,150,000 3,000,000 1,600,000 Not Funded Total 2,250,000 150,000 3,150,000 1,750,000 150,000 150,000 42 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Figure 13-1 Existing and Proposed Fire Stations jTSgure 13-1 EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE STATIONS . Existing City Fire Stations K Existing County Fire Stations KCFD 25-2 BellCTue serves under contract KCFD 20 Wot Hill I y«n«r IndvttrUI Ar«ft Station 14 T.I..I mil ^ \ J . \ * I / KCFD 40-4 1/ L_ •> Renton Station 13 / ! KCFD 40-42 City of RENTON, WASHINGTON Source: Renton Flr« Department, 1986 ct/Sept. 1886 xp—i 43 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/ADMINISTRATTON CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2001-2006 The Economic Development Division of the City is planning three major capital projects to support growth and economic expansion during the 2001 to 2006 planning period. The Port Quendall development is a 20-acre site on the southeast shore of Lake Washington. The project includes hazardous waste clean-up planning, clean up, shoreline park development and sale of the upland property for private development. The site is contaminated with coal tar and creosotes. It needs to be restored to an environmentally safe habitat site for fish and wildlife and an area that would provide opportunity for public access to the shoreline. The Perforniing Arts Center is a new capital project emerging out of a unique partnership between the community, the City of Renton, and the Renton School District to transform the Renton High School Auditorium into a state of the art, 550- seat facility for the performing arts. This alliance capitalized on the planned upgrade of the high school auditorium and mobilized efforts to raise $1.5 million. The City has pledged $400,000(which will be matched by community contributions) and set aside $50,000 for the architectural design of the facility. The rest of the funds will come from the community and from matching grants from foundations. Neighborhood Grant Program provides $50,000 to be distributed in small matching grants to organized neighborhood associations that draw membership from a commonly recognized geographic neighborhood in Renton. The grant projects must be a benefit to the pubic, create physical improvements, build and enhance a neighborhood feature and be within Renton City limits. 44 Amended 6/25/01 CITY OF RENTON CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Table 14-1 Economic Development/Administration Facilities 2001-2006 Economic Development Projects 2001 2002 2003 Neighborhood Grants 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Port Quendall 6,866,000 6,616,000 3,416,000 Performing Arts Center 200,000 200,000 Total 7,116,000 6,666,000 3,466,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Sources of Funds: General Fund 250,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Licenses and Fees Bonds Grants 3,325,000 3,200,000 1,600,000 Not Funded 3,541,000 3,416,000 1,816,000 Total 7,116,000 6,866,000 3,466,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 45 EXHIBIT B COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT Amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to change the designation of the following property: Change Employment Area-Industrial and Employment Area-Office to Employment Area - Transition (Merim) for 43.31 acres at N. 8th Street, Park Avenue N. and House Way N. Application: 00-M-1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment #00-M-l EA-I and EA-0 to EA-T (Interim) CDR s-l EA-T EA-T EA-I EA-T U-u EA-I Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment (00-M-1) EA-I to EA-T ... New Landuse Designation Boundary o 400 800 Economic Development. Neighborhoods * Strategic Planning 1:4,800 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP Amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to reflect the changes specified in Exhibit B, as shown on the following map exhibit. RESIDENTIAL ! j Residential Rural | | Residential Single Family | | Residential Options [ | Residential Planned Neighborhood | j Residential Multi-Family Infill CENTER DESIGNATIONS M Center Neighborhood I I Over Suburban | | Center Downtown HHI Center Office Residential [ [ Center Institution | | Center Village EMPLOYMENT AREA DESIGNATIONS [ | Employment Area - Commercial | j Employment Area - Office | | Employment Area - Industrial [ | Employment Area - Valley ' I rmployment Area - Transition (Interim) MISCELLANEOUS DESIGNATIONS HHj Convenience Commercial City Limits Urban Growth Boundary 11 1 StmJf 1 Comprehensive P 2000 1:48000 4000 NTON Land Use A Planning/Building/Public Works EXHIBIT C LAND USE ELEMENT POLICIES AND TEXT The Land Use Element policies and text are amended to read as follows. Policies not listed remain unchanged. Employment Area- - Transition (Interim) Objective LU-EE.d: Provide for the transition of the traditional industrial area to include employment-based and residential uses. Employment-based uses include commercial, office, existing industrial and research based uses that support the economic development of the City of Renton. These policies are intended to guide redevelopment over a three-year period or until updated as part of a GMA mandated review, which ever comes first. Policy LU-212.25 Develop portions of the North Renton Industrial Area as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, residential and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.26 Recognize viable existing industrial uses in areas with this designation, while allowing the gradual transition of these uses. Policy LU-212.27 Non-traditional uses such as biotech, research, design, and development facilities should be allowed in office designations and industrial designations when their impacts to surrounding uses can be mitigated. Policy LU-212.28 A mix of uses (i.e. commercial, office, residential and industrial) should be allowed to locate in proximity to one another in order to promote urban employment-based development in the North Renton Industrial Area. Policy LU-212.29 Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including: a. shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities, and amenities; b. an improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; and c. an opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch facilities, and express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not exist. Policy LU-212.30 Retail and service uses should be located north of North 8th Street on major streets or arterials where they will have good visibility. Policy LU-212. 31 Uses should be selected from the range of uses allowed in the existing CA Zone to encourage a group of activities that are synergistic with office, biotech, research, technology, and residential. Strip commercial, veterinary, kennels, adult entertainment, outdoor storage, contractors' services, and convalescent centers are examples of uses discouraged under this designation. Traditional retail (Main Street), general business and professional services, and general offices are examples of the types of uses that are encouraged under this designation. Disallow the following uses: vehicle sales and service including automobiles, RVs, boats, truck and motorcycles. Policy LU-212.32 Residential uses should be allowed only west of Park Avenue North. Policy LU-212.33 Residential density ranges should be determined through the adoption of development agreements at the time of zoning. The same area used for commercial and office development can also be used to calculate residential density. Policy LU-212.34 Retail uses and services should be allowed with redevelopment proposals, as either mixed uses within a building or on separate development pads on one site. Policy LU-212.35 Ancillary uses are permitted when part of an approved site plan. When part of a mixed-use development, an approved phasing plan shall be provided. Exh. C-EA-T 1 Objective LU-EE.e: Provide flexibility in the regulatory processes by allowing for a variety of zone designations in the Employment Area - Transition (Interim) designation. Zones which implement the Employment Area - Transition (Interim) include Heavy Industrial (LH), Light Industrial (EL), Commercial Office (CO), Center Downtown (CD), and Commercial-Office-Residential (COR). Policy LU-212.36 Changes in zoning from industrial to another zone should achieve a mix of uses that improves the City's economic base and employment base. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficiency in the use of the land, and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse impacts should be taken into account. Policy LU-212.37 Zoning text amendments should be prepared to allow retail and service uses in the zone designations implementing the Employment Area - Transition area. Policy LU-212.38 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones in which similar and/or compatible uses are already located in the area. Policy LU-212.39 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones where there is an opportunity to create improved efficiencies of use through the joint use/sharing of on-site facilities such as parking, open space and supporting services. Policy LU-212.40 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones to non-industrial uses when the proposed use will contribute to the City's economic or employment base. Policy LU-212.41 COR proposed rezones for mixed use development without residential uses should be considered throughout this designation. Consideration should only be given to COR proposed rezones which include residential uses in the area west of Park Avenue North. Policy LU-212.42 Favorable consideration should be given to rezones allowing bulk commercial retail uses where a site has high visibility. Objective LU-EE.f: Encourage projects throughout the designation which create cohesive, quality developments integrated with urban amenities and natural features. The intention is to create compact, urban developments with high amenity values that, when developed over time, result in a gateway to the City. Policy LU-212.43 Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Employment Area - Transition (Interim) to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. Policy LU-212.44 When new uses are proposed for locations in close proximity to intensive existing uses, the responsibility for mitigating adverse impacts of the new use should be the responsibility of the new use. Policy LU-212.45 Development should demonstrate reasonable compatibility between uses. Policy LU-212.49 Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged. Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking. Policy LU- 212.50 Site plans and proposed structures should be designed so as to fully integrate signage, building height, bulk, setbacks, landscaping, and parking considerations across the various components of each proposed development. Policy LU- 212.51 A street network should be developed to support redevelopment of this transition area. Policy LU- 212.52 Primary uses may include complexes with offices, residential development, Policy LU 212.46 Quality site planning and architectural design should be used to create reasonable compatibility between uses. Policy LU-212.47 Development standards should promote an increased intensity and/or quality of development. Policy LU-212.48 Larger retail uses should be encouraged, whenever possible, to group themselves into larger retail type power outlets with shared off-street parking, a common architectural theme and common landscape character. hotels and convention centers, and research and development facilities. Policy LU- 212.53 Incentives which encourage a mix of uses and structured parking should be provided in development regulations. Policy LU- 212.54 Flexibility of use combinations and development standards should be allowed to encourage redevelopment of sites which have significant constraints including environmental, access and land assembly constraints. Exh. C-EA-T 2 Policy LU- 212.55 Private/public partnerships should be encouraged to plan for infrastructure development, public uses and amenities within this designation. Policy LU- 212.56 A review process should be required for all proposed non-exempt development except SEPA exempt development under this designation. Site plans should illustrate and justify the mix and compatibility of uses, residential density, conceptual building configurations (massing, location) proposed, site and landscape design, identification of gateway features, signs, circulation, and phasing. Policy LU- 212.57 Site plan review of mixed-use developments should address signage, building height, bulk, setbacks, landscaping, and parking considerations for all components of the development. Policy LU- 212.34 A combination of internal and external site design features, including the following, should be encouraged in all mixed-use developments: a. public area plazas and amenities, b. distinctive architectural features, c distinctive focal features such as streetscape design, d. gateways where appropriate, and, e. decorative on-site landscaping and screening. Policy LU-212.59 Create a logical and harmonious working environment in mixed-use developments through the application of appropriate development standards, emphasizing quality landscaping, setbacks and consistent streetscape treatment. Policy LU-212.60 Site design for office uses should consider ways of improving transit ridership through siting, locating of pedestrian amenities, walkways, parking, etc. Exh. C-EA-T 3 MM RESIDENTIAL Residential Rural | | Residential Single Family | | Residential Options | [ Residential Planned Neighborhood | • ;:.f | Residential Multi-Family Infill CENTER DESIGNATIONS m Center Neighborhood Center Suburban Center Downtown Center Office Residential | • ; I Center Institution \\\ Center Village EMPLOYMENT AREA DESIGNATIONS IMaS! Employment Area - Commercial HHIIIfl Employment Area - Office | | Employment Area - Industrial ) | Employment Area - Valley HH Employment Area - Transition (Interim) MISCELLANEOUS DESIGNATIONS Convenience Commercial CITY OF RENTON Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map City Limits Urban Growth Boundary 2000 1:48000 4000 Technical Services •] Planning/Building^Public Works ™ Printed July 25,2001