Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 2816 RESOLUTION NO. 2816 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1990 WHEREAS, the 1990 Washington State Legislature passed an Act dealing with Growth Management (HB 2929) which requires all jurisdictions in King County to prepare comprehensive plans consistent with new guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that jurisdictions prepare these plans in cooperation with their neighbors and with King County; and WHEREAS, the Act assigns near term deadlines for the completion of (1) an inventory and regulations for the protection of resource lands and critical areas, (2) a process to identify an urban growth area, and (3) an assessment of land use data collection needs; and WHEREAS, the Legislature appropriated $7.4 million dollars for each year of the 1989-1991 biennium to assist the Department of Community Development and local governments to comply with and implement the Act; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development will provide approximately $2 . 1 million dollars to a consortium of general purpose governments in King County provided that 60% of those governments representing 75% of the county's population agree to the grant distribution formula and to jointly develop and - 1 - RESOLUTION NO. 2816 cooperatively implement a work program; and WHEREAS, a technical committee of representatives from City of Seattle, King County and Suburban Cities have prepared a draft work program (Attachment A) , and a grant distribution formula (Attachment B) ; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. The above findings have been found to be true and correct. Section 2 . To be eligible for a share of the Growth Management Act grant funds, the City agrees to: a. Designate the King County Planning Directors as the group which will manage the completion of the work program, receive regular briefings on the activities and progress of the technical forums, and coordinate preparation of the annual reports to the State Department of Community Development (Attachment C) . b. Send a representative to, and actively participate in a technical forum to accomplish the work program (Attachment A) , specifically, the inventory and protection of resources and critical areas, the designation of an urban growth area, and creation of a countywide data sharing group. C. The grant distribution formula (Attachment B) , which is that every general purpose government in King County will receive a base amount of $35, 000. 00 plus a per capital allocation based on the jurisdiction's proportional share of total county population. d. Designation of King County as the jurisdiction that will 2 - RESOLUTION NO. 2816 accept the grant funds from the Department of Community Development and disburse and administer those funds consistent with the provisions of this resolution including attachments. e. Submit a short written description of a high priority project which is unique to this City and upon which the jurisdiction intends to begin work in this funding year (September 1, 1990 to July 1, 1991) . f. Complete the Growth Management Needs Assessment and return it to the State Department of Community Development by January 1, 1991, with a copy to the King County Planning Division. RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington this 24th day of September, 1990. APPROVED: � f MAYOR ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: 1)2" City Cle APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney B. 1. 12 . 55 3 - �tNI CST UCI'I Vr VVIVIMUINIIT UCV+ O-L4-yU r y•LOAM t VlIT VT- FCUCnML WMT'' VlIT Vf RCINIVIN tM 0 RESOLUTION NO.- 2816 "ATTACHMENT A" WORK PRPR99M M_ Each of the following work items will include a citizen participation/community involvement element. Consistent with section 14 of the Growth Ma nageXaent Act, the Technical Forums, Planning. Directors Association, and the various uriedietions will establish procedures for disseminating information, involving citizens and ;interest groups, - and considering alternatives. These procedures will be identified in a detailed scope 'of work developed for each technical. forum. RESOURCE AND CRITICAL LANDS TECHNICAL FORUM ' SHB 2929 requires that King County, and each city within King County, designate natural resource lands and critical areas within their respective jurisdictions. The County and each city must then adopt development regulations to assure the conservation of resource lands, and to preclude land uses or } development that cis ompleted latedpbyible with Septembercl.,�tl9gi.tical areas. These actions must P Og C To facilitate and coordinate the designation and regulation of natural resource lands and critical areas by King county and each city within King county, as required by sections 5 and 17 , SHB 2929 . A TC TONL King County and the cities of King county will establish and participate in a Resource and critical. Lands Technical Forum charged with carrying out this objective. The Technioal Forum will undertake the following activities: 1. Seek consensus on a common or compatible approach to the criteria for designation and regulation of both natural resource lands and critical areas. 2 . Coordinate designation, mapping and other issues relating to the political boundaries between jurisdictions. 3 . Exchange ideas, experiences and expertise and relating to the designation and regulation of natural resource lands and critical. areas. 4 . Explore the joint use of consultants, data and other resources among jurisdictions. 5. Coordinate with the designation and regulation efforts of Snohomish and fierce counties. g, periodically brief elected officials through established intergovernmental forums. VLIYI VI rVLl it VI VVlrllrlVIY11 1 VLI r V 11 4V 1 V LT 111 1 VA I I VI 1 Vv�l1/1111t1 vi l I vl r� r vii n -r RESOLUTION NO. 28.16 FrAttac "' t ea E Each jurisdiction will adopt regulation s whichure lroduce a coordinated and compatible system of u and critical areas throughout King County by September 1, 1991. URBAN GROWTH AREAS DESIGNATION AAgKGR-Q2M.L SHE 2929 requires that by July 1, 19911 King County begin consulting with each city regarding the location of an , Urban Growth Area. ' Urban Growth Areas must include areas and ected densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is prof to. occur in King county over a twenty year period. Due to the complexity of urban growth issues, ongoing planning efforts and other consideration, it is imperative that the County and cities begin work on growth areas ,immediately. A cooperative effort will ensure that the legitimate interests of all jurisdictions are considered in the ultiTnate designations. OB 10T1yZ1, To fosteriibasetupon� n and whi.cheKingoCounty Urban provide an accurate information Growth Area decisions will be made. c ort • The urban/rural boundary of the King county ' Comprehensive Plan, together with the land use, development and urban service policies of the County and cities, will provide the basis upon' which Urban Growth Area decisions will be made. The first step toward Making these decisions will be to determine the growth capacity of the county and cities, based on existing plans and policies and on criteria established for urban Growth Areas. . King County and the .citi.es of King County will: 1. Establish and participate in an Urban Growth Area Technical Forum, which will seek consensus on criteria, methodologies and format tused andyemploymentCounty growthacYr city to estimate their population capacities. 2 . ' Each city and the County will estimate their own capacities for population and employment growth, based upon a. ) local plans and policies and b. ) consistent with agreed to criteria, methodologies and format. 3 . The- Urban Growth Area Technical Forum will compile the capacity estimates ,prepared by King County jurisdictions for purposes of evaluating the countywide Urban Growth Area. 4 . As s second priority, the Urban Growth Area Technical Forum will take initial 'steps toward delineation of Urban Growth Areas. This effort will be undertaken ro liag�� of SHB 2029 's recognition that cities are the apP p providers of urban government services. This effort will also recognize and support King County' s ongoing efforts to refine the existing urban/rural boundary through the vLii W I616 I. V1 VVi•iinVirii 1 616VV v 6T VV i V •6..Vn1q 1 Vii i V1 i 6.611.1%M6. VVM1 Vii 1 V1 1%"141V11 'W v RESOL'U'TION N0. 2816 ## t tl18 All C � E3cY adoption and updating of Community Plans. Initial steps Will include: a. Seeking consensus on criteria to guide decisions on the future boundaries of King county' s cities Decision-making criteria should include such issues as development densities, efficient urban services prevision and timing of annexation. b. Identifying and mapnthere�is noturban agx�eementth Areas and areae where c. IdentifnQnk��banelements' Growthof a Areas�ocess for achieving agreement d. King County will work, directly with cities in establishing Urban Growth Areas according to the following sequence: Cities in areas of .community Planning projects in progress and cities' near or bordering rural areas/unincorporated areas: 1991: Auburn, Kent, Renton, Redmond, Bothell, Kirkland, Snoqualmie Valley, Enumclaw, Bellevue. 1992 : Issaquah, Black Diamond., Cities in western King County urban area, not near rural designation areas or not bordering unincorporated areas (e.g. Desi Moines, Tukwila., Federal. Way) : 1992 : All. remaining cities. o UgTgl 1, Estimate of countywide population and employment growth capacity, based on existing plans and policies by July 1, 1991. 2 . Process for d.elinaating and agreeing to Urban Growth Areas, by July if 1991. 3 . Map(s) identifying agreed-to UrbanGot Areas and highlighting areas where there e agreement, September 1,1991. 4 . Urban Growth Area designations by end of 1992 . KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGIONAL GOALS CHAPTER BA The current Icing County Comprehensive Plan was adoptQd in 1985. 'King County has recently initiated a major RESOLUTION NO. 2816 tshttaCh a G+ { ued/dace .A review -of that plan, and has taken steps to solicit the active involvement of all local jurisdiction$. This involvement is especially important in light of the coordination and consistency requirements of SH 2929 . oBJ TXVE: To promote coordination and consistency ybetween the King County Comprehensive Plan and then planning cother County, local jurisdictions through the King County Comprehensive Flan review process. ACTIONS The Resolution of the suburban Cities Association of King County Regarding Priorities -of the 1990 review of the King County Comprehensive Plan (adopted May 9, 1990, will provide the starting point for a joint effort to review, maintain and strengthen the regional policies of' the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. King County will continue to actively involve cities in the review and refinement of goals and policies having regional import. The cities will actively participate in the Comprehensive plan Review, through the King County Suburban Cities Association and, where appropriate, through direct involvement and discussions with the County. At a minimum, each city will be responsible for identifying any conflict or inconsistency between their own plans and policies, and any proposed regional policies for King County. Cities should also make suggestions for resolving any such conflict or inconsistency. RROD CTs:_ Adopt updated, strengthened and coordinated regional goals and policies for the King County Comprehensive Plan and City Comprehensive Flans by the end of 1991. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DATA SHARING GROUP BACKGRO NDt, Successful implementation of SHB 2929 will depend upon a high level of cooperation and coordination among local jurisdictions. Such coordination is currently hampered by a lack of comparable land use and development data from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. 0SJgQT1M To share land use and development . data and work toward common methods of compiling and reporting information. g ITIrdu First year activities will involve consultation between the cities and the County on standardization of references. PRODUCTS: 1. Identify and compare data collection andtabulation systems used by each jurisdiction, by July It 1991- 2 . Identify common data needs by July 1, 199 .• RESOLUTION NO. 2816 _"Attach rr OIi 6 e 3 . Agree to a common format for collecting and tabulating common data needs by September. l,, 199.1. WORK PROGRAMS FOR INDIVIDUAL KING COUNTY JURISDICTIONS Each adopting jurisdiction is to provide a paragraph describing an individual multi-year work -program designed to implement SHB 2929 . The focus of the work program should be on activities to be completed July 1r 1990 to duly jr 1991 with highlights for the years 1992, 1993 , 1994 . Milestones and timelines are the two 'key words in completing this requirement as they will be used as the basis for measuring progress and disbursing funds during this first year. RESOLUTION NO. 2816 A!lACHXIX! B GROMIb t{AIICiXII! ACr 2UIDIXG 08121(90 IDID1 IYIILIBLt $7,480,160 III; COUl!! RIGIOIIL ILLOCAlIOI DOI MIrLAIDS IUXDIIG ($3)3,611) ($)5,060+peren t) $2,146,692 COUIlY HOLDOUr (S CO0Ir1ISJ (SSg0,046) 1989 POPDLIIION 1,482,860 PDAD8 M ILIBLI l0 RIGIOIS 14,426,580 PIRCII! 01 RIGIOXAL POPULIlIOI 39,911 41798,100 $1111 POPULAri0I CirilS 31 3,115,680 POPULIIIOI 01 111 15 RIGIOXB GROMrl Rltt 14,371 ....................................................................... .................................. l0rt; HS! AHOUII I8 IOR OII PLAIIIRICOIEUL1111 ?OR OXI 111R, ...........................................................................................--------- PIR CAPIII OH DISIVICTiOII 1910 1948 POPULAI'IOI 18 IIAR tilt II31D OR IURISOI;rIOR POPULA!I01 POPU 0101 PIRCM GROVIR RIrI Mull I OI RIGIOI 10% ALCOMI 1467 1,726 0.121 111251 ;35,060 $1,279 $36,219 HIM 26417 34,110 2.301 29,271 135,080 ►25,389 160,389 ti1UI AXIS 321 294 6421 -10,371 $35,000 $219 135,214 BILLIYUb 73903 81190 $1991 20.281 335,000 $66,085 $141,005 BLACK DIACOID 1170 1,510 8,181 291061 $35,406 $1,123 $36,123 WEILL (PARI) °" 7943 11,500 0,781 44,781 $33,066 10,11@ 542,416 CARIAlIOX 951 1,255 0.081 311911 135,000 $933 135,933 CLYDI; HILL 3229 3890 01211 •4,381 135,400 $2,297 $31,291 DIS MOTHS 137E 15,490 11041 109,931 135,060 $11,516 $46,516 DUYALL 729 2,435 0.161 234.621 =351400 $1,810 $36101@ IMCLAW 5427 6,390 0.431 17.741 $351606 $4,751 539,751 IIDIRAL MIT 63,980 4,311 14,371 $35,100 $41,565 $12,565 BUIls POI6l 413 464 01031 4135t 135,040 1375 $35,375 ISSIQUAH 5536 7,390 0.501 33,491 135,000 15,494 $401494 lilt 22961 37,446 21521 63,061 135,400 127,135 $62,835 IIRG COUIrY 503363 514,834 34.121 2,211 $35,040 $382,750 $417,750 I1RK1.1ID 18779 37,700 2,541 190;161 $35,000 $28,028 $63,628 LIKI )OR911i PARK 2485 2108 0,191 12,681 135,440 $2,082 $31,002 XIDIXA 3221 2,964 01201 -8.471 135,400 $2,261 $37,261 XIRCIR ISLAXD 21522 20,630 1.311 -4.141 135,10@ 115,331 150,337 XILIOX (?ARl) "' 211 565 4,041 159,17% 14,449 $426 $4,869 IORM DY PARC 4268 6620 0,/5t - 55,111 $35,448 $4,922 $39,922 NORTH BRAD 1701 2,420 01161 42,271 135,044 $1,799 636,799 PACIIIC 2241 4,614 0.281 84.451 $35,008 $3,033 638,033 RIDYORD 23318 35,420 21391 51,961 $35,000 526,333 $61,333 RIIIOX 30612 39,340 2,651 28,511 135,060 $21,247 $64,247 SIArAC 24,000 1 621 14,371 $35,010 $17,143 02,843 SIAMI I 4!3846 501,800 33,041 1 611 135,440 $313,140 $448,060 SITIONISH 209 243 4,021 16,271 $35,000 1181 $35,161 E104UALXII 1370 1,545 0,161 12.771 $35,008 $1,149 $36,149 1UH M 3578 10,824 0.731 202,44135 000 YARROW POitir 1071 985 4.071 -8.141 $ $8,044 $43,044 135,000 $732 135,732 32 1,482,800 $1,148,315 11,102,377 $2,194,692 BO!8I1L ARD KILPOI MILL RICIIYI A I WOR1101AII SRARI 01 181 8I81 AXOOI, 101BILL'S SHRI is 96,761 KILrOX'S 1IARt IS 12,711 RESOLUTION NO. 2816 ATTACHMENT "C" GOVERNMENTAL FRAMEWORK For approximately the past five years, the general purpose governments in King County have been working more cooperatively to resolve land use and service delivery issues. The Solid Waste Interlocal Forum and the Eastside Transportation Forum are two examples of effective regional problem solving groups in this area. Building on the success of these and other groups, the county's general purpose governments have been discussing the creation of a more formal COUNTYWIDE PLANNING COUNCIL "to assure coordination, consensus, consistency and compliance" among local governments as they implement the Growth Aianagement Act and adopt comprehensive planning policies to be applied countywide. Decisions on the formation of a countywide planning council and other strategies for local coordination and cooperation are anticipated during Fall 1990 and Winter 1991 . In the interim, the general purpose governments in this county have agreed' to designate the King County Planning Directors Association as an appropriate forum for discussing issues, exchanging information, promoting standardization and consistency, encouraging cooperation and providing technical assistance. The directors have been functioning in this capacity for several years with considerable success The group meets regularly each month, attracts planning directions from City of Seattle, King County, and from most of the suburban cities and small towns in the county. RESOLUTION NO. 2816 WORK PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF RENTON The City of Renton intends to perform the following tasks to implement SHB 2929 : Dec. 31, 1990 -Identify land use and development data needs. July 1, 1991 - Complete critical areas inventory. Sept. 1, 1991 - Adopt critical areas ordinance. Dec. 31, 1991 - Adopt comprehensive plan. 1992 - Adopt urban growth area in cooperation with surrounding jurisdictions. 1993 - Revise all capital facilities plans to conform with comprehensive plan.