Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 5643CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5643 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 6-27-6 OF CHAPTER 27, SHOPPING CART REGULATION, OF TITLE VI (POLICE REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", BY DELETING REFERENCES TO SPECIFIC COSTS OF FILING FEES REGARDING SHOPPING CART CONTAINMENT AND RETRIEVAL PLANS. WHEREAS, the City recognizes that fees have been removed from the Renton Municipal Code and moved to a separate Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, leaving fees in certain code sections results in confusion and may be inaccurate; and WHEREAS, two fee references were inadvertently left in Title VI, Chapter 27, and should be removed to the City's Fee Schedule for consistency; and WHEREAS, this matter was referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 16, 2011, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsections 6-27-6D.1, Plan review and decision, and 6-27-6E.1, Filing of Appeal, of Chapter 27, Shopping Cart Regulation, of Title VI (Police Regulations) of Ordinance 1 ORDINANCE NO. 5643 No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", are hereby amended as follows: 6-27-6D: 1. Plan review and decision. Upon the filing of any proposed plan pursuant to this Chapter, and receipt of the required $KJ© processing fee, the Development Services Director shall review said proposed plan and either: 1) approve, 2) approve with conditions, or 3) deny the Abandoned Shopping Cart Prevention Plan. If the proposed plan is denied, the notice of decision given to the owner shall state the grounds upon which the proposed plan was denied. The owner may appeal a decision of the Development Services Director to the Hearing Examiner in the time and manner provided in RMC 4-8-110. 6-27-6E: 1. Filing of Appeal. Any owner aggrieved by any adverse decision of the Development Services Director pursuant to this Chapter may appeal such decision within fourteen (14) calendar days following the date of such decision by filing with the Hearing Examiner or City Clerk a written notice of appeal briefly stating the grounds for such appeal. The notice of decision shall be deemed filed on the date the $75.00 appeal processing fee has been paid. No appeal shall be accepted for filing and processing by the Development Services Director unless accompanied by the appeal processing fee. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 5643 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 12th day of December 2011. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this i2th day of December # 2011. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 12/16/2011 (summary) UJ ..' ' ORD:1748:12/6/ll:scr 4 f' . * '' ,. 3