HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 5779 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGT4N
ORQINANCE NO. 5779
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION
4-1-160 OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINI5TRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITI.E IV
{DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, SETTING
THE IMPACT FEE AT $4,635 PER NEW SINGI.E-FAMII.Y HOME ANQ $1,534 PER
NEW IVIULTI-FANII�Y IN THE tSSAQUAH SCHOOl. DISTRICT; SETTING THE
lMPACT FEE AT $4,990 PER NEW SINGI.E FAIVIII.Y HC?ME AND $2,163 PER NEW
MUITt-FAMILY HONif IN THE KENT SCHOt?L DiSTRiCT; 5ETTING THE IMPACT
FEE AT $5,643 PER NEW SING�E FAMI�Y HOME AND $1,385 PER NEW MUII'i-
FAMI�Y HClME IN TNE RENTON 5CH8C}L DIS7RICT; AND ADt3PTING TNE
CAPITAL FACICiTiES PtANS OF THf ISSAQUAH, KENT AND RENTON SCHt?OL
DISTRICTS.
WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of
Title IV (Development Regulationsj, of the Renton Municipal Cade, as amended, and the maps
and reports adapted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on
behalf of the Issaquah Schoo! District an impact fee of$4,550 far each new single-family home
and $1,458 for each new multi-family unit built within the Distric#'s baundaries; and
WNEREAS, the Issaquah Schoal District requested that the City af Renton adopt the
District's 2015 Capital Facilities Plan, which indudes an increase in the impact fee for new
single-famiiy homes to $4,635 and an increase in the impact fee for new multi-family units ta
$1,534; and
WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 af Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of
i
� Title IV (Development Regulations�, of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps
;
and reports adapted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on
behaff of the Kent 5chool District an impact fee of$5,486 for each new single-family hame and
$3,3?8 far each new multi-family unit buil#within the District's boundaries; and
1
- �
ORDINANCE NO. 5779
WHEREAS, the Kent School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the District's
2015/2016 — 2020/2021 Capital Facilities Plan, which requests a decrease in the impact fee for
new single-family homes to $4,990 and a decrease in the impact fee for new multi-family units
to $2,163; and
WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of
Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps
and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on
behalf of the Renton School District an impact fee of $5,541 for each new single-family home
and $1,360 for each new multi-family unit built within the District's boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the Renton School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the
District's 2015-2021 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes an increase in the impact fee for new
single-family homes to $5,643, and increase in the impact fee for multi-family units to $1,385;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Subsection 4-1-160.D.5 of subsection 4-1-160.D, Fee Calculations, of Chapter
1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title tV (Development Regulations) of the Renton
Municipal Code, is hereby amended as follows:
5. The City Council may adjust the fee calculated under this
subsection, as it sees fit to take into account local conditions such as, but not
limited to, price differentials throughout each respective school district in the
cost of new housing, school occupancy levels, and the percent of each school
2
ORDINANCE NO. 5779
district's Capital Facilities Budget, which will be expended locally. The City
Council establishes the following fees:
Single Family Fee Multi-Family and Accessory
Amount Dwelling Unit Fee Amount
Issaquah School District �A�- 4 635 c�,�� 1 534
Kent School District �;4S�A� 4 990 c�,�� 2 163
Renton School District c�,`�- ^� 5 643 c�,�9� 1 385
SECTION II. Subsection 4-1-160.J.1 of subsection 4-1-160.J, Adoption of Each School
District's Capital Facilities Plan and Submission of the Annual Updates and Report and Data, of
Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement of Title IV (Development Regulations) of the
Renton Municipal Code, is hereby amended as follows:
1. Renton adopts the following capital facilities plans by reference as part
of the Capital Facilities Element of Renton's Comprehensive Plan:
a. The Issaquah School District No. 411 �8�4 2015 Capital Facilities
Plan;
b. The Kent School District No. 415 ����A�� '^'��'^'^
2015/2016—2020/2021 Capital Facilities Plan; and
c. The Renton School District No. 403 ���4 --'�0 2015 — 2021
Capital Facilities Plan.
3
ORDINANCE NO. 5779
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five (5)
days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 23rd day of November , 2015.
�1`�l.`t ` �(%
' Jason A. �ieth, City'�lerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 23rd day of November , 2015.
� '
�� ��
Denis�Law, Mayor
���a�»a��Ein�uiuutu;�rr�o
Approved as to form: \\\.\`��\�y UF RE/��,0,,''�/i
; � � 2/=
c���-�— �* SEAI, �_ �
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney �� � � �
�
�% 6�`,��
Date of Publication: 11/27/2015 (summary) '�ii,,,,,,,,,, �ps������a``
'''��ryni}ui�����rC�,
ORD:1892:10/20/15:scr
4
2015 Capítal tøcìlities Plan
Issaquah School District No. 411
Issaquah, Washíngton
Adopted August 12, 2015
Resolution Ì{o. 1057
The Issaquøh School Dßtrìct No. 411 hereby provídes thís Capital Facílìtíes Pløn documentìng
present øndfuture schoolfacilíty requìrements of the District, The pløn contaìns all elements
requìred by the Growth Manøgement Act and Kíng County Councíl Ordínance 21-A.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STANDARD OF SERVICE
TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION
DEVELOPMENT TRACKING .,...,.....
NEED FOR IMPACT FEES
EXISTING AND FUTURE CAPACITY NEEDS
ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY
TABLE #1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2006-2007 - 2014-2015 AND
E N RO LLM ENT PROJ ECTTONS 20 1 5-20 1 6 - 2029-2030 ......
TABLE #2: STUDENT FACTORS - SINGLE FAMILY
TABLE #3: STUÐENT FACTORS - MULTI FAMILY
INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES .......,........
SITE LOCATION MAP
SIX.YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN
TABLE #4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS
SINGLE AND MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL ¡MPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ..
APPENDIX A: 201 4-2015 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES .........
APPENDIX B: 2014-2015 MIDDLE SCHOOL C4P4C1T18S .....................
APPENDIX C: 2014-2015 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES ...............
APPEN DIX D: 201 4-2015 TOTAL CAPACITI ES ................
APPENDIX E: SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN ........
I
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
11
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the lssaquah School
District (the "district") as the districts primary facility planning document, in compliance with the
requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 214.
This Plan was prepared using data available in March, 2015.
This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the lssaquah School
District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The
District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with
board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in
the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans
will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan.
ln June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school
impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the
King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan
is the annual update of the Six-Year Plan.
King County and the cities of lssaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect
impact fees on behalf of the District. All of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact
fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an
annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly.
-1-
STANDARD OF SERVICE
School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space
required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program
standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade confíguration, optimalfacility
size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling
requirements and use of re-locatable classroom facilities (portables).
Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special
education or the gifted program. With the passage of lnitiative 728in November 2000, the
lssaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The
Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by
l-728; this will be done via local levy funds. There is also recently passed legislation that requires
the State to fund Full-Day Kindergarten by 2018, those assumptions are not used in this analysis,
but may be considered in future capital facility plans. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is
now being used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28
for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the
purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King
County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms.
lnvariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of
service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective
bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to
come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of g5% is used to adjust design capacities to
what a building may actually accommodate.
Portables used as classrooms are used to accommodate enrollment increases for interim
purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become
available, the portable(s) is either moved to another schoolas an interim classroom or removed.
Legislative proposals to reduce K-3 classroom ratios to 1711would have a significant impact on
the standard of service. A review of all elementary schools shows that 65 additional classrooms
would be needed to meet the proposed 1711ratio. Allsites are crowded, existing permanent
facilities cannot house existing students and all but the most recent new school use portable
classrooms to house existing students. Existing portable classrooms already burden building
core facilities.
Another legislative proposal would require Full-Day Kindergarten for all kindergarten students
This proposalwould require an additional23 classrooms distributed among allelementary
schools.
Combined, these legislative proposals would require an additionalSS elementary school
classrooms. The King County decision to no longer allow schools to be build outside the Urban
Growth Boundary Line (UGBL) means District owned property planned for a new elementary
schooland middle schoolcannot be used. The State does not provide funding for property
purchases and the District does not have funding for any property purchases at this point in time.
Approved Bond funding does not include new capacity projects to meet the additional housing
needs of the Full Day Kindergarten or 17l1 classroom ratio legislative proposals, and only
includes capacity for projected near term growth.
-2-
TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION
The lssaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes the rebuild/expansion of two
elementary schools, adding classrooms to one high schooland a rebuild/expansion of lssaquah
Middle School to meet the needs of elementary, middle school and high school capacity needs.
Planning the need for new schools is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our
permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by
geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year.
The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need.
Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our
citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability
to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. The planned facilities
will be funded by a bond passed on April 17,2012, school impact fees and reserve funds held by
the District. New school facilities are a response to new housing which the county or cities have
approved for construction.
The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E found on page 21.
-3-
DEVELOPMENT TRACKING
ln order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has
been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data
provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual
number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. lt also
provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing
facilities andlor the need for additional facilities.
Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the
number of students who will attend our school from future developments. District wide statistics
show that new single-family homes currently generate 0.473 elementary student, 0.173 middle
school student, 0.150 high school student, for a total of 0.795 school aged student per single-
family residence (see Table 2). New multi-family housing units currently generate 0.156
elementary student, 0.051 middle school student, 0.049 high school student, for a total of 0.256
schoolaged student per residence (see Table 3).
-4-
NEED FOR IMPACT FEES
lmpact fees and state matching funds have not been a reliable source of revenue. Because of
this, the lssaquah School District asked its voters on February 7 ,2006 to fund the construction of
an elementary school, one middle school, expand Maywood Middle School, expand Liberty High
School, and rebuild lssaquah High School. District voters also approved on April 17,2012 ballot
measure that provides funding to expand two elementary schools, rebuild/expand two additional
elementary schools, add classrooms to one high school and rebuild/expand one middle school.
Due to the high cost of land and the limited availability of a parcel large enough to accommodate
a middle school program, the School Board reallocated the moneys designated to build the
middle schoolto expand the capacity of lssaquah and Skyline high schools.
As demonstrated in Appendix A, (page 17) the District currently has a permanent capacity (at
100o/o) to serve 7476 students at the elementary level, Appendix B, (page 18) shows a
permanent capacity (at 100%) for 3954 students at the middle school level Appendix C (page 19)
shows a permanent capacity (at f 00%) of 5400 students at the high school level. Current
enrollment is identified on page L The District elementary projected Oct 2015 headcount is
9152. Adjusting permanent capacity by 95% leaves the District's elementary enrollment over
permanent capacity at the elementary level by 1676 students (Appendix A). At the middle school
level, the projected Oct 2015 headcount is 4612. This is 658 students over permanent capacity
(Appendix B). At the high school level the district is over permanent capacity by 8 students
(Appendix C).
Based upon the District's student generation rates, the District expects that .795 student will be
generated from each new single family home in the District and that .256 student will be
generated from each new multi-family dwelling unit.
Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 8 to the District's existing permanent
capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2020-
21, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be over its
permanent capacity by 2055 students, at the middle school level by 855 students, and will be
over its permanent capacity by 261 at the high school level. The District's enrollment projections
are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival- historical enrollment method is used
to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District;
then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new
developments in the District.
-5-
To address existing and future capacity needs, the District's six-year construction plan includes
the following capacity projects:
Facility
Exoansions
Projected
Comoletion LocationDate
Additional
Caoacitv
PCMS Portables
Clark Elementary
Clark - Portables
Sunny Hills El
Newcastle El
Portables
2015
2017
2015
20'16
2015
lssaquah
lssaquah
lssaquah
Sammamish
Newcastle
lssaquah
Renton
lssaquah
lssaquah
Sammamish
56
244
80
248
40
332
156
120
1'12
112
lssaquah Middle 2016
Maywood Middle 2016
Tiger Mtn. Com. HS 2016
lssaquah HS Portables 2015
Skyline HS Portables 2015
Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment pojections, as wellas the student
generation data, the District has determined that a majority of its capacity improvements are
necessary to serve students generated by new development.
The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the
facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing
the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling
unit and then reduces that amount by the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The
resulting impact fee is then discounted further. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to
the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve
each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of
providing capacity to address existing needs.
The King County Council and the City Councils of the Cities of Bellevue, lssaquah, Newcastle,
Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the
District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact
fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050 -.100 and the adopted local
ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that
developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of
occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit
issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected
later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance;
and (2) no developer applícant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for
more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District's recent and ongoing student growth,
coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth,
requires strict adherence to this position.
-6-
2
ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY
Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of
anticipated student enrollment:1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine lssaquah School District enrollments
for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-
year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new
development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason,
these projections are also slow to react to actual growth.
Based on information from King Gounty, realtors, developers, etc., seek to establish the
number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year. The new dwelling units are
converted to new students based on the following:
a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the
past several years.b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past
several years, i.e., 5o/o to kindergarten, 10Yo to first grade, 2o/o to 11th grade, etc.c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the
most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings.
After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved
forward from year to year with the arrived at additions.
One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that they tend to always show
growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases.
Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as
the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 1Oth graders
is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is
examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still
assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school.
When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even
though the general population continues to grow. A precise statisticalformula has not been
developed to make this adjustment.
After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An
examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be
more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a
shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to
average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period.
Enrollment projections for the years 2015-2016 through 2029-2030 are shown in Table #1
Student generation factors are shown in Table #2 and#3.
-7-
IS
S
A
Q
U
A
H
SC
H
O
O
L
DI
S
T
R
I
G
T
Ac
t
u
a
l
St
u
d
e
n
t
Co
u
n
t
s
20
0
6
-
0
2
Th
r
o
u
g
h
ZO
1
4
-
1
5
En
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
20
1
5
-
1
6
Th
r
o
u
g
h
20
2
9
-
3
0
Total 15,340 15,480 15,E07 16,138 16,563 17,147 t7,465 18,006 18,435 t8,759 19,120 19,328 19,560 19,831 20,t16 20,341 20,s49 20,805 24,945 21,08E 21,167 t2K-5 6-8 9-12 3 6889 7023 7lgt 7462 7565 7863 8058 8317 843 I 8492 8605 8592 8582 8593 8742 8901 9040 9195 9344 9336 9339 9344374538043840389240644t4843t6443546124742477148624924509950915071501050075023s17053 15 545644550915l 651 I65605362836t34707465364986604
To
t
a
l
15
,
3
4
0
15
,
4
9
0
15
,
8
0
7
16
,
1
3
8
16
,
5
6
3
17
,
1
4
7
17
,
4
6
5
18
,
0
0
6
1E
,
4
3
5
18
,
7
5
9
19
,
1
2
0
19
,
3
2
8
19
,
5
6
0
19
,
8
3
1
20
,
1
t
6
20
,
3
4
1
20
,
5
4
9
20
,
8
0
5
20
,
9
4
5
21
,
0
8
9
21
,
1
6
7
K
1S
T
2N
D
3R
D
4T
H
sT
H
6T
H
7T
H
8T
H
9T
H
ll
T
H
I2
T
H
12
6
6
I
12
5
12
5
0
I
12
0
3
13
3
7
t3
1
9
13
9
0
13
9
6
13
6
1
14
8
9
14
9
4
15
6
0
14
9
2
14
7
7
l5
0
l
14
9
0
t4
9
3
t6
4
6
t6
3
6
16
3
4
16
4
5
16
4
5
16
3
8
t6
3
9
16
3
9
13
2
4
12
4
6
13
5l
13
5
5
14
2
3
14
6
7
t4
t
4
15
5
2
15
3
9
16
0
8
15
4
4
t5
2
5
15
4
7
15
3
8
t5
4
t
r6
9
4
16
8
4
16
8
2
16
9
3
t6
9
3
16
8
7
16
8
7
12
2
7
13
4
5
12
9
9
13
8
5
t3
7
4
14
9
6
15
2
6
14
7
8
15
9
6
15
8
6
l6
6
l
15
9
3
t5
7
I
15
9
5
15
8
6
15
9
0
t7
4
3
17
3
2
17
3
0
t7
4
l
17
4
2
17
3
s
12
3
5
12
3
6
t3
7
t
13
1
9
t4
t
7
14
4
0
14
9
8
15
4
5
14
9
9
t6
1
9
16
0
8
t6
7
3
16
0
7
15
9
0
16
1
3
16
0
3
t6
0
6
17
6
0
t7
4
9
17
4
8
17
5
8
17
5
9
12
9
9
12
8
4
12
5
8
14
0
0
13
4
6
14
4
8
14
7
7
I
)t
5
15
7
5
t5
3
2
16
5
2
t6
4
t
t7
0
5
t6
4
0
16
2
3
16
4
6
16
3
6
16
3
9
t7
9
2
17
8
2
17
8
0
t7
9
t
12
7
6
t2
7
9
12
8
6
12
6
8
14
0
7
t3
6
2
14
6
2
t5
t
2
15
6
5
15
8
6
15
4
4
16
6
3
16
5
2
17
t
'
t
16
5
1
16
3
4
16
5
7
16
4
7
16
5
0
18
0
3
t7
9
3
17
9
2
12
7
1
12
5
8
12
9
9
13
2
6
13
1
1
14
4
7
l3
9
l
t4
9
t
15
4
2
15
9
5
t6
t
3
15
6
8
16
8
6
16
7
9
t7
4
3
t6
7
7
16
5
9
16
8
2
16
7
3
16
7
6
18
2
9
18
1
8
I
19
8
12
6
7
12
5
5
12
9
8
13
4
6
13
3
9
t4
6
3
14
3
2
15
0
5
15
6
1
16
1
3
16
3
0
15
8
6
17
0
3
t6
9
7
17
6
0
t6
9
4
16
7
7
17
0
0
16
9
t
16
9
3
18
4
6
12
5
2
12
l
5
13
2
6
t3
2
6
13
6
1
t4
t
2
13
4
4
14
9
5
t4
7
4
15
4
3
15
9
3
16
3
8
16
5
9
l6
l
9
l7
3
s
t7
2
7
17
9
0
17
2
4
17
0
8
17
3
0
17
2
1
17
2
3
t3
2
t
l2
2
s
t1
7
1
13
3
3
13
1
9
13
5
3
14
0
4
13
5
2
14
8
6
14
6
5
15
3
3
15
8
2
16
2
7
t6
4
9
16
0
9
17
2
4
t7
t
6
17
8
0
t7
1
4
t6
9
7
t7
2
0
17
t
l
1t
3
t
12
3
5
tt
3
2
11
1
0
t2
3
3
12
2
5
12
3
3
12
9
2
12
4
9
13
7
7
13
5
3
t4
t
7
14
6
7
15
ló
ts
3
7
t4
9
5
l6
t
t
16
0
3
16
6
7
16
0
1
15
8
4
16
0
7
60
1
57
4
59
3
61
3
60
9
65
1
65
4
69
4
66
2
ó5
5
66
4
66
0
66
1
73
8
73
3
73
2
73
7
73
7
73
4
73
4
73
4
73
5
t4
I
55
3
l3
8
l
l0
2
t
1t
llfi
4
10
1
ll
l
ll
l
tt
4
t
12
6
5
13
0
0
13
5
5
17
3
5
18
0
2
I
59
8
FT
E
En
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
Ye
a
r
20
0
7
-
0
8
20
0
8
4
9
20
0
9
-
1
0
20
1
0
-
1
1
20
l
t
-
1
2
20
1
2
-
1
3
20
1
3
-
1
4
20
1
4
-
1
s
20
r
5
-
1
6
20
1
6
-
t
7
20
1
7
-
t
E
20
1
8
-
1
9
20
1
9
-
2
0
20
2
0
-
2
t
20
2
1
-
2
2
20
2
2
-
2
3
20
2
3
-
2
4
20
2
4
-
2
5
20
2
5
4
6
20
2
6
-
2
7
20
2
7
-
2
8
20
2
8
-
2
9
6t
1
A
2
U
5
-8
-
611212015 2i12PM
STUDENT GENERATION SINGLE FAMILY
STUDENTS AVERAGE PER UNIT
-o-b.4..9
27
82
49
38
91
26
88
86
1
*
27
44
49
33
51
26
147
22
()
ç
5
19
27
10
28
4A
16
16
I
146
2
es
qt' o)'
14
54
85
45
622o
38 27
00
(D
ç
0.185
0A32
0.551
0.212
0.157
0.231
0.551
0.091
0.516
0.393
0.273
0.263
0.068
0.267
q)
(cl
0.037
0.114
0.163
0.121
0.118
0.077
0.259
0.000
0.180
0.161
0.000
0.184
0102
0.133
s
q:
0.148
0.091
0j02
0.152
0.039
0.000
0.184
0.000
0.156
0.232
0.000
0.053
0.136
0.233
^rÞ0.370
0.636
0.816
0.485
0.314
0.308
0.993
0.091
0.852
0.786
0.273
0.500
0.305
0.633
^9Single Family Development
Belcara
Belvedere
Cavalia
Chestnut Estates
Claremont
Delany Park
Glencoe @ Trossachs
Heritage Estates
lssaquah Highlands
Laurel Hill & Laurel Hills 2,3,4
Lawson Park
Shorelane Vistas
Talus; Bridges
Tarmigan @ Pine Ridqe
1981 1817 937 327 2U 1548
56562291344
31113003
3838107219
64 59 4 6 I 18
3030 I 4 7 19
7
8
6
81
2
TOTALS
SINGLE FA]I'IILY
Elementary K - 5
Middle School6 - 8
High School9 - 12
TOTAL
2787 2410 1139 417 361 1917 0.473 0.173 0.150 0.795
0.473
0.173
0.150
0.795
These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past five years.
TABLE 2
STUDENT G EN ERATION MU LTI-FAIUIILY
Multi-Family Development .o,d
STUDENTS
a>aS
ç e: ",'Alta at the Lake Condos 80 58 3 1 1 5Copperleaf282820O2
lssaquah Highlands 1392 1198 202 65 63 330
Lake Boren Townhomes 56 56 2 3 I 6
^rt-^$-"sù.
AVERAGE PER UNIT
{f,ss
ç
0.052
0.o71
0.169
0.036
(r'
0.017
0.000
0.054
0.054
o'
o.017
0.000
0.053
0.018
0.073
0.107
0.288
0.091
Totals
MULTI.FAMILY
Elementary K-5
Middle School6-8
High School9-12
TOTAL
1556 13r'¡O 209 69 65 343 0.156 0.051 0.049 0.256
0.156
0.051
0.049
0.256
These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past five years.
TABLE 3 -10-
INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES
Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 15,985 students
in permanent facilities and 3,876 students in portables. The projected student enrollment for the
2015-2016 school year is expected to be 18,435 including K-5 headcount which leaves a
permanent capacity deficit of 2450. Adding portable classrooms into the capacity calculations
gives us a capacity of 19,861 with a surplus capacity of 1426 for the K-12 student population.
Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A,
B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D.
Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site
Location Map on Page 12.
EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION
GRADE SPAN K.5:
Apollo Elementary
Briarwood Elementary
Cascade Ridge Elementary
Challenger Elementary
Clark Elementary
Cougar Ridge Elementary
Creekside Elementary
Discovery Elementary
Endeavour Elementary
Grand Ridge Elementary
lssaquah Valley Elementary
Maple Hills Elementary
Newcastle Elementary
Sunny Hills Elementary
Sunset Elementary
GRADE SPAN 6.8:
Beaver Lake Middle School
lssaquah Middle School
Maywood Middle School
Pacific Cascade Middle School
Pine Lake Middle School
GRADE SPAN 9.I2:
lssaquah High School
Liberty High School
Skyline High School
Tiger Mountain Community H.S
SUPPORT SERVIGES:
Administration Building
May Valley Service Center
Transportation Center
Transportation Satellite
15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton
17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton
2020 Trossachs Blvd. SE, Sammamish
25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., lssaquah
500 Second Ave. S.E., lssaquah
4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue
20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish
2300 228tn Ave. S. E., Sammamish
26205 SE lssaq.-FallCity Rd., lssaquah
1739 NE Park Drive, lssaquah
555 N.W. Holly Street, lssaquah
15644 204th Ave. S.8., lssaquah
8440 136th Ave SE, Newcastie
3200 lssaq. Pine Lake Rd. S.8., Sammamish
4229W. Lk. Samm. Pkwy. S.8., lssaquah
25025 S.E. 32nd Street, lssaquah
400 FirstAve. S.E., lssaquah
M49A 168th Ave. S.E., Renton
24635 SE lssaquah FallCity Rd, lssaquah
3200 228th Ave. S. E., Sammamish
700 Second Ave. S.E., lssaquah
16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton
11222281h Ave. S.E., Sammamish
355 S.E. Evans Lane, lssaquah
565 N.W. Holly Street, lssaquah
16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton
805 Second Avenue S.8., lssaquah
3402228 Ave S.E., Sammamish
-11-
IS
S
A
Q
U
A
I
T
rc
H
(
X
)
L
DT
S
T
R
I
C
T
tt
4
t
t
{P School Districis O Schools I Undeveloped Site S Urban G¡owth Area
Ri
d
g
e
[S
@
rE
S
5/
V
0
Q
{
^
/
Á
¿
A,ll F VA|.î_ËY
.ç
c
È
i
o
ü
¿
/ltsTfïtcr
SA
M
M
A
M
I
S
þ
I
BË
L
L
Ë
V
U
Ë
'it\Htlh4 f\SCl-irftfl ¿USlÂl{:T
0t
5
¡
Ê
/
f
I
BE
L
I
.
E
V
U
{
,
kc
f
f
i
c
C¡
s
c
¡
d
e
IS
S
A
Q
U
A
H
t3
NE
W
C
A
S
T
L
H
Co
m
r
n
u
n
l
t
y
H$
HS
RE
N
i
'
O
N
OA
F
o
t
b
ÊS
IS
S
A
Q
U
/
\
H
sc
f
r
a
G
L
oi
s
r
8
t
c
r
8Ê
Â
l
r
Õ
A
,
4,'d
.
¿.
,
Ë5
'4
,
b¡
-
ç
m
r
r
:
¡
t
/,
f
^
r,
et
\^uó
J*
'ù
at
l
a
p
l
e
ll
l
l
l
r
ÉS
KÉ
f
f
T
sc
H
û
{
)
i
"
Ð1
5
T
'
t
T
/
a
r
Å
2
I W.
r
THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S
SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN
The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table #4 (page 14) is the
District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted.
Voters passed a $241.87 million bond in February 2006 to fund new school construction and
schoolexpansion. Voters also approved $219 million in April 2012to fund school construction
and expansion projects. The District will expand Liberty High Schooland Maywood Middle
School and Apollo Elementary to accommodate growth experienced in the south end of the
District. ln the lssaquah core area, the District will expand Clark Elementary, lssaquah Valley
Elementary, lssaquah Middle Schooland Tiger Mountain Community High Schoolto
accommodate growth. On the lssaquah Plateau, the District will expand Sunny Hills Elementary
to accommodate growth. The District does not anticipate receiving State matching funds that
would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects included
in this Plan.
ïhe District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments
that will be applied to capital projects.
The District projects 18,435 FTE students forthe 2015-2016 schoolyearand 19,831 FTE
students in the 2020-2021 school year. Grourth will be accommodated by the planned facilities.
Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of this factor is assigned to
impact fees and half is the local share.
- 13-
20
1
9
-
2
A
17
9
3
0
17
0
3
4
38
7
6
20
9
1
0
19
5
6
0
-2
5
2
6
13
5
0
20
1
8
-
1
9
17
9
3
0
17
0
3
4
38
7
6
20
9
1
0
19
3
2
8
-2
2
9
4
15
8
2
20
1
7
-
1
8
17
6
8
6
24
4
17
0
3
/
-
38
7
6
20
9
1
0
19
1
2
0
-2
0
8
6
17
9
0
20
1
6
-
1
7
16
8
3
0
12
0
48
8
24
8
16
8
0
2
38
7
6
20
6
7
8
18
7
5
9
-1
9
5
7
19
1
9
20
1
5
-
1
6
16
8
3
0
15
9
8
5
38
7
6
19
8
6
1
18
4
3
5
-2
4
5
0
14
2
6
20
1
4
-
1
5
16
3
7
8
21
6
32
0
16
0
6
8
33
4
0
19
4
0
8
17
7
4
0
16
7
2
16
6
8
Ye
a
r
s
"P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
Ca
p
a
c
¡
t
y
Hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
Mi
d
d
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Sc
h
o
o
l
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Ra
t
e
@
95
%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
(S
u
m
at
95
%
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Ra
t
e
)
Po
r
t
a
b
l
e
s
@
95
o
/
o
To
t
a
l
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
FT
E
En
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
*
*
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
Ca
p
a
c
þ
@)
95
%
(s
u
r
p
l
u
s
/
d
e
f
i
c
i
t
)
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
Oa
p
VP
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
s
(s
u
m
l
u
s
/
d
e
f
i
c
i
t
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
to
Ho
u
s
e
St
u
d
e
n
t
s
"
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
an
d
Ne
w
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
ar
e
ba
s
e
d
on
th
e
95
%
ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
fa
c
t
c
Th
e
nu
m
b
e
r
of
pl
a
n
n
e
d
po
r
t
a
b
l
e
s
ma
y
be
re
d
u
c
e
d
if
pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
is
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
by
a
fu
t
u
r
e
bo
n
d
is
s
u
e
.
**
20
1
4
-
1
5
Ac
t
u
a
l
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
1s
t
en
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
co
u
n
t
s
,
ki
n
d
e
r
g
a
r
t
e
n
st
u
d
e
n
t
s
on
l
y
co
u
n
t
e
d
as
ha
l
f
an
FT
E
-1
4
-
Table #3
SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
DISTRICT lssaguah SD #411
YEAR 2015
School S¡te Acquisition Cost:
(AcresxCost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)xstudent Generation Factor
Student StudentFacility CosU Facility Factor Factor
Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFRElementary 0.00 $1,500,000 604 0.473 0.156
Middle/JR High 0.00 $1,500,000 338 0.173 0.051High 0.00 $1 ,500,000 I,500 0.150 0.049
TOTAL
School Construction Cost:
(Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)xStudent Generation Faclor)x(permanent/Total Sq Ft)
Student Studento/oPerml Facility Facil¡ty Factor Factor
Total Sq.Ft. Cost Capacity SFR MFRElementary 95.18% $20,350,000 604 0.473 0.156
Middle/JR High 95.18% $4,162,500 338 0.173 0.051High 95.18% $0 336 0.150 0.049
TOTAL
Temporary Faclllty Coet:
(Facility CoslFacility Capacity)xstudent Generation Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Feet)
Student Student
%Temp/ Facility Facility Factor Factor
Total Sq.Ft. Cost Size SFR MFRElementary 4.82o/o $175,000 80 0.473 0.156
Middle/JR H¡gh 4.82o/o $175,000 56 0.173 0.051High 4.82o/o $175,000 224 0.150 0.049
TOTAL
State Matchlng Cr6d¡t:
Area Cost Allowance X SPI Square Footage X District Match % X Student Factor
Student Student
Current Aréa SPI District Factor Factor
Cost Allowance Footage Match % SFR MFRElementary $200.40 90 0.00% 0.473 0.156
Middle/JR High $200.40 115 0.007o 0.173 0.051
High School $200.40 130 0.00o/o 0.150 0.049
TOTAL
Tax Payment Credit:
Average Assessed Value
Capital Bond lnterest Rate
Net Present Value of Average Dwelling
Years Amort¡zed
Property Tax Levy Rate
Present Value of Revenue Stream
Fee Sumary:
CosV
MFR
$0
$0
$0
$0
CosU
SFR
$0
$0
$0
$0
CosV
SFR
$1 5,156
$2,028
$0
$r7,184
CosU
SFR
SFR
$610,085
3.88%
$5,028,1 l3
10
$1.59
$7,995
CosU
MFR
$5,002
$604
$0
$5,605
Cosl
MFR
MFR
$195,656
3.68%
$1,612,530
10
9r.59
$2,564
$50
$26
$6
$82
CosU
SFR
$0
$0
$0
$0
$16
$8
$2
$2ô
CosU
MFR
$0
$0
$0
$0
Site Acquistion Costs
Permanent Facility Cost
Temporary Facility Cost
State Malch Credit
Tax Payment Credit
Single
Famlly
$0.00
$17,184.05
$81.53
$0.00
($7,ee4.70)
Mult¡-
Family
$0.00
$5,605.25
$26.03
$0.00
($2,563.e2)
FEE (AS CALCULATED)$9,270.88 $3,067.36
FEE (AS DISCOUNTED by 507o)$4,635.44 $1,533.68
FINAL FEE $4,635 $1,534
Each city or county sets and adopts the amount of the school ¡mpact fee.
For the applicable fee schedule, please consu¡t with the permitting jurisdiction for the development pOect.
'15
BASIS FOR DATA USED IN
SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION GOST:
¡ Elementary No new sites are planned for purchase.
¡ Middle School No new sites are planned for purchase.
r High School No new sites are planned for purchase.
SGHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST:
o Elementary $20,350,000 is the proportional cost of the projects
providing additional elementary capacity.
' M dd e Schoo i*::î"iÎ,ãå53H:iil'ïìi:i:üìilJi i.ifli:il3ï1ff:ffifil;.,
. High School No new high schools are planned.
PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEÍIIIPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL
SQUARE FOOTAGE:
TotalSquare Footage 2,498,894
Permanent Square Footage (OSPI) 2,336,270
Temporary Square Footage 162,624
STATE MATCH GREDIT:
Current Area Cost Allowance 8200.44
42.10o/oPercentage of State Match
-16-
V xrpuaddv
-
L
L
-
-
s
a
l
q
e
l
o
d
u
r
p
ê
r
u
e
s
r
u
o
q
s
s
p
l
.
J
o
J
ê
q
u
n
u
u
n
u
!
Æ
u
ê
r
¡
¡
s
n
d
f
¡
{
c
e
d
e
¡
}
u
ê
u
e
u
ê
d
ê
q
¡
s
â
p
n
l
c
u
t
,
{
¡
l
a
?
d
E
9
u
n
u
l
x
e
u
â
¡
_
¡
1
'
^
¡
¡
J
e
d
Ð
u
ô
¡
s
s
p
o
r
¡
r
u
ã
s
J
o
l
â
^
a
l
s
,
6
u
l
Þ
l
l
n
q
?
q
¡
s
¡
¡
a
u
a
j
,
q
r
e
d
æ
l
u
?
u
e
u
J
a
d
t
æ
w
l
t
d
u
3
t
u
n
o
.
p
e
ê
H
s
n
u
r
y
{
0
o
p
e
l
u
o
¡
p
z
x
l
}
n
)
%
ç
6
x
¡
u
e
u
n
q
u
3
¡
u
n
o
?
p
æ
H
s
ñ
u
r
h
l
o
o
p
B
]
u
o
t
¡
u
x
l
l
n
)
%
ç
6
x
Á
l
c
B
d
e
C
ç
€
Ê
z
:
!
z
-
y
0
z
:
r
J
o
l
a
ô
J
e
l
s
o
l
l
a
J
o
e
6
a
ã
^
V
.
.
u
n
u
x
P
l
l
i
$
r
l
u
a
u
B
u
a
d
.
.
¡
o
^
s
-
ø
l
o
*
$
Q
I
p
à
ù
*
a
F
p
-
é
'
-
S
J
6
.
s
s
S
r
l
t
c
v
d
v
c
-
t
o
o
H
S
s
^
u
v
l
N
3
u
u
3
-
t
3
I
t
-
þ
r
0
2
,
u
r
r
t
L
I
f
i
*
r
"
f
3
8
n
r
n
f
I
t
r
"
r
f
'
r
"
r
'
f
'
0
È
F
"
r
"
r
'
!
2
,
r
r
f
I
F
r
"
'
r
*
f
'
;
z
-
i
l
"
-
l
*
'
l
o
'
l
ß
r
r
f
'
i
t
r
f
6
e
f
t
r
'
'
f
o
'
r
i
l
r
,
.
'
l
*
n
l
"
¡
t
-
r
"
l
r
,
?
r
'
"
r
*
f
i
9
ø
l
¿
ç
1
6
l
0
r
r
8
0
¿
W
L
9
5
t
t
0
9
9
f
i
l
.
9
t
9
9
E
¿
9
e
9
9
¿
S
9
¿
¿
0
g
¿
9
4
9
9
¿
9
z
L
9
D
¿
L
9
z
Z
O
L
3
w
l
c
0
0
o
l
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
?
0
o
a
0
8
2
l
l
¡
0
D
0
0
0
0
I
¿
0
t
t
t
t
r
¡
r
-
P
'
E
8
¡
r
"
l
r
¡
2
9
r
r
"
L
a
g
r
-
r
*
$
2
t
r
'
l
P
*
t
8
t
t
r
n
'
l
r
"
'
9
9
9
r
f
l
'
¿
,
t
0
9
r
i
l
'
"
¿
r
i
l
"
'
l
l
*
'
¿
€
¿
r
"
r
*
j
r
¿
i
l
*
[
r
'
E
A
t
r
"
f
'
m
9
r
F
¡
G
5
¡
l
l
9
û
l
o
l
l
0
z
9
z
¡
0
9
r
-
r
"
t
8
9
r
"
i
l
'
-
L
I
I
0
t
o
¿
I
I
0
t
0
t
0
t
z
,
,
,
%
t
0
t
9
r
r
9
9
9
r
r
'
t
Í
t
r
F
t
¿
a
r
i
l
*
8
S
t
i
l
'
*
l
l
o
E
9
r
,
F
¿
È
t
r
i
l
.
'
z
n
r
"
r
'
t
J
t
t
r
*
i
l
*
'
9
9
l
l
*
f
0
6
t
l
l
'
o
l
l
*
z
r
s
r
*
r
'
?
e
9
r
f
'
¿
5
U
I
I
g
L
'
L
l
t
g
t
9
t
t
t
r
r
e
6
Ê
r
"
r
,
z
e
E
E
e
0
g
E
t
I
E
'
0
2
9
0
9
9
0
9
t
0
0
t
0
z
Ê
o
z
,
o
t
9
0
w
0
t
þ
l
t
g
t
8
ç
J
8
t
3
8
8
0
0
9
0
9
6
9
9
Z
8
Z
¿
a
)
¿
9
t
t
¿
L
Z
Z
Z
L
Z
6
t
v
z
6
l
9
Z
8
t
t
o
l
l
o
d
!
O
O
O
M
w
l
U
€
3
9
0
t
u
S
G
V
3
S
V
C
u
t
e
N
f
-
n
v
H
3
v
u
\
f
t
c
3
9
0
r
u
u
v
e
n
o
c
3
0
t
s
v
f
3
u
c
^
u
ã
^
o
c
s
t
c
u
n
o
\
Ë
o
N
3
3
3
€
I
Ë
O
N
V
U
Ð
^
3
t
t
v
H
V
n
O
V
S
S
t
s
f
l
t
H
t
t
d
w
3
'
ì
l
s
v
c
M
S
N
s
ï
r
H
,
(
N
N
n
s
L
l
s
N
N
S
l
v
l
o
t
v
K
p
u
e
d
d
v
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
B "E
20
1
4-
2
0
1
5
MI
D
D
L
E
SC
H
O
O
L
CA
P
A
C
I
T
I
E
S
E
o
d o
àa
"s
&o
_$
o
^9
'
ùv
^6
\
\!
þ
q,
S
*M
i
n
u
s
ex
c
l
u
d
e
d
sp
a
æ
s
fo
r
sp
e
c
¡
a
l
pr
o
g
E
m
re
d
s
*'
P
e
m
a
n
e
n
t
Ca
p
a
c
¡
t
y
x
95
o
/
o
(u
t
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
fa
c
t
o
r
)
Mi
n
u
s
He
a
d
æ
u
n
t
En
t
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
*"
M
a
¡
m
u
m
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
x
95
0
/
0
(u
t
i
l
¡
z
a
t
i
o
n
fa
c
t
o
r
)
M¡
n
u
s
He
a
d
@
u
n
t
En
r
o
f
l
m
e
n
t
Pe
m
a
n
e
n
t
€p
a
c
i
t
y
ßf
l
e
c
t
s
th
e
bu
¡
l
d
¡
n
g
'
s
þv
e
l
of
se
r
y
¡
æ
de
s
i
g
n
€p
a
c
i
t
y
.
Th
e
mã
i
m
u
m
€p
a
c
¡
t
y
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
th
e
pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
€p
a
c
i
t
y
pl
u
s
th
e
ma
x
¡
m
u
m
nu
m
b
e
r
of
cl
a
s
s
r
c
o
m
s
ær
v
e
d
in
po
r
t
a
b
l
e
s
.
125 -l -tß -51 -t2t 4-121 -l¡ß -l¡!¡.f9s -31!35!
86
:
7A
'1
o
7
3
99
¡
as
7
46
1
2
10
10
3
8
a7
Ê
10
5
€
10
À
6
.
8'
1
6
44
3
4
o 0 52 0
1U
0 0 2 0 4
0â
6
78
1
lr
ì
ç
â
oa
a
na
lo
*
82
t
1l
1
a
99
¡
aí
a
26
(
1*st
15
É
)o
8
a3
a
10 6 2 €€
73
S
61
!
l
lf
l
o
g
57
Á
37
4
7
f7
a
6â
t
1æ
2
t:
t
¡
ât
t
8
39
5
4
'A 96 48 a4
28
r
)I 4 7
24
75
4
57
2
1ñ
1
Á
75
4
57
2
ff
i
2S 22 39 29
)t
14
1
BE
A
V
E
R
LA
K
E
IS
S
A
Q
U
A
H
\4
I
D
Ð
L
E
UA
Y
W
O
O
D
PA
C
I
F
I
C
CA
S
C
A
D
E
PI
Ñ
É
I
AK
F
TO
T
A
L
18
-
fupendix B
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
C
20
1
4
.
2
0
1
5
HI
G
H
SC
H
O
O
L
CA
P
A
C
I
T
I
E
S
oc s9 oI-ñ d eê"--tta
À
e\
'
o1
-a
"
"
øu
J.
_s
o fg
6\
a-
áÊ
"9
"
E
\ø
þd
t
^È
\
{!
C)
-o
È
-
I
e (r
""
t
"
o(
o<
,'28 t0t A toi 48:t(-lot 4 -212 t
20
4
2
1
18
f 4(
20
8
1
53
ø
€
14 c €
24
3
2
15
3
2
84
23
0
¿
0
16
8
c c
1ô
8
0 6 o o 6
'3
1
ß
l2
s
¡o
2t
8
S
6A
t
6
,¿
t
t
t3
a
¡
A/
ã¡
0
¡
al
¡
¿
22
4
72
4
c
5*7A
t
I 0 12
2û
g
t
ta
!
80
ta
?
d
6t
3
t
22
0
â
t
t¡
l
¡
8¡
t*
l
6¡
l
0
t
4t
a¿3€
19
2
2 4 7 3 16
21
4
4
1o
9
2
o
19
3
2
52
0
8
78 0 ô9
1A
€
IS
S
A
Q
U
A
H
iI
G
H
LI
B
Ë
R
r
y
HI
G
H
TI
G
E
R
MT
N
SK
Y
L
I
N
Ê
HI
G
H
TO
T
À
L
'M
¡
n
u
s
êx
d
u
d
e
d
sp
a
æ
s
fo
r
sp
æ
i
a
l
pr
o
g
É
m
ne
e
d
s
"
He
a
d
c
o
u
n
t
En
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
Co
m
p
a
r
e
d
to
Pe
m
a
n
e
n
t
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
x
95
0
/
6
(u
t
¡
l
¡
z
a
t
¡
o
n
fa
c
t
o
r
)
'*
He
a
d
c
o
u
n
t
En
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
Co
m
p
a
r
e
d
to
Ma
x
¡
m
u
m
Câ
p
æ
i
t
y
x
95
0
/
6
(ú
t
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
fa
c
t
o
r
)
Pe
m
a
n
e
n
t
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
re
f
e
c
t
s
th
e
bu
¡
l
d
i
n
g
'
s
le
v
e
l
of
se
r
v
¡
æ
de
s
i
g
n
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
.
Th
e
m€
x
¡
m
u
m
æp
a
c
i
t
y
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
th
e
pe
m
a
n
e
n
t
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
pl
u
s
th
e
ma
i
m
m
nu
m
b
e
r
of
cl
a
s
s
r
m
m
s
se
r
u
e
d
in
po
r
t
a
b
l
e
s
.
-1
9
-
Appendix C
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
D
2U
4
-
2
A
1
5
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
To
t
a
l
Ga
p
a
c
i
t
y
^-
S
6
¿!
)
r9
1
5
6
20
6
21
4
6
2
55
2
24
41
3
6
18
6
95
83
15
8
3
4
67
5
'P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
Ca
p
a
c
¡
t
y
is
th
e
to
t
a
l
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
fr
o
m
þp
e
n
d
i
x
A
+
To
t
a
l
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
fr
o
m
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
B
+
To
t
a
l
Ca
p
a
c
í
t
y
ft
o
m
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
C
,2
0
-
Appendix D
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
E
Si
x
-
Y
e
a
r
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
Pl
a
n
"N
=
Ne
w
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
M
=
Mo
d
e
m
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
/
R
e
b
u
i
l
d
*T
h
e
ls
s
a
q
u
a
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
wi
t
h
vo
t
e
r
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
,
ha
s
fr
o
n
t
fu
n
d
e
d
th
e
s
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
*"
"
S
c
h
o
o
l
im
p
a
c
t
fe
e
s
ma
y
be
ut
i
l
i
z
e
d
to
of
f
s
e
t
fr
o
n
t
fu
n
d
e
d
ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
as
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
wi
t
h
th
e
co
s
t
of
ne
v
v
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
lm
p
a
c
t
fe
e
s
ar
e
cu
n
e
n
¡
y
co
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
fr
o
m
Ki
n
g
Co
u
n
t
y
,
Ci
t
y
of
Be
l
l
e
v
u
e
,
Ci
t
y
of
Ne
w
c
a
s
t
l
e
,
Cí
t
y
of
Re
n
t
o
n
,
C¡
t
y
of
Sa
m
m
a
m
i
s
h
an
d
th
e
Ci
t
y
of
ls
s
a
q
u
a
h
fo
r
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
wi
t
h
i
n
th
e
ls
s
a
q
.
Sc
h
o
o
t
Districi.
fo
r
po
r
t
a
b
l
e
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
ma
y
co
m
e
fr
o
m
im
p
a
c
{
fe
e
s
,
st
a
t
e
ma
t
c
h
i
n
g
fu
n
d
s
,
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
ea
m
i
n
g
s
or
fu
t
u
r
e
bo
n
d
sa
l
e
el
e
c
{
i
o
n
s
.
UNötr,UUKtsU LOCAL***s500.000 $500,ür0SECUREDLOCALISTATE*"$62,500,000 $2,000,000 $65,200,000 $16,662,000 $19,500,000 $3,925,000 $7,270,000 $8,4t¡5,000 $27,200,000 $3,150.000 $212,892,ü¡0
uo
s
t
to
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
$6
2
.
5
0
0
.
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
5
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$l
ô
.
6
6
2
.
0
0
0
$2
2
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
,
9
2
5
,
0
0
0
$7
,
2
7
0
,
0
0
0
$8
,
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
$2
7
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
'
1
5
,
8
9
2
,
0
0
0
20
1
8
$2
.
7
0
0
.
0
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
,
(
x
¡
o
20
1
7
$4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$r
.
2
5
0
.
0
0
0
$2
3
.
5
0
0
.
0
0
0
$2
8
,
7
5
{
r
,
0
0
0
20
1
6
$8
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
9
2
5
,
0
0
0
20
1
5
$3
5
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
s1
0
.
5
0
0
.
0
0
0
$4
.
1
6
2
.
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
$1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
$r
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
$6
3
,
6
6
2
,
0
0
0
20
1
4
$1
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
.
5
0
0
.
0
0
0
$2
.
5
0
0
.
0
0
0
$1
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$6
.
0
2
0
,
0
0
0
$7
.
2
8
5
,
0
0
0
sô
t
,
æ
5
,
0
0
0
20
1
3
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
4
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
8
,
3
5
0
,
ü
'
0
NI
M
*
M M M M M M M M M N
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
ls
s
a
q
u
a
h
Mi
d
d
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
ls
s
a
q
u
a
h
Hi
q
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
Li
b
e
r
t
y
hi
g
h
Sc
h
o
o
l
Ma
y
w
o
o
d
Mi
d
d
l
e
Sc
h
o
o
l
Cl
a
r
k
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Ti
q
e
r
Mo
u
n
û
a
i
n
Ap
o
l
l
o
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
v
ls
s
a
q
u
a
h
Va
l
l
e
v
Su
n
n
y
Hi
l
l
s
Po
f
l
a
b
l
e
s
*
*
*
*
TO
T
A
L
S
-2
1
-
Appendix E
Kent School District
Capital Facilities Plan
2015-2016 - 2020-2021
KENT
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
,dune 2015
SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015-2016 a 2020-2021
June 2015
Kent School District No. 415
12033 SE 256`h Street
Kent, Washington 98030-6643
(253) 373-7295
BOARD of DIRECTORS
Ms. Karen DeBruler, President
Ms. Deborah Straus, Vice President
Ms. Agda Burchard, Legislative Representative
Mr. Russ Hanscom, Director
Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Director
Dr. Calvin J. Watts
Superintendent of Schools
Dr. Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer
Ralph Fortunato, CSBS, Director of Fiscal Services
Fred Long, Director of Facilities Services
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015
Kent School District
Sim Tear Capital Facilities Flan
2a6Ce of Contents
Section
Page Number
I
Executive Summary
2
11
Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History
4
III
District Standard of Service
9
I V
Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools
12
V
Six -Year Planning & Construction Plan — Site Map
15
V I
Portable Classrooms
18
VII
Projected Classroom Capacity
19
VIII
Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules
24
I X
Summary of Changes to Previous Plan
32
X
Appendixes
33
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015
Executive Summary
This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent
School District (the "District') as the organization's capital facilities planning
document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth
Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent,
Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This
annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2015 for
the 2014-2015 school year.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the
Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document
for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long
Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account
a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities,
and other needs of the District as may be required.
Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School
Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of
Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan
Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also be
Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their in
Comprehensive Plans.
District have been adopted by
Kent, Covington, Auburn and
element of the Comprehensive
an submitted to cities of Black
ormation and inclusion in their
In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent
School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a
fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the
incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and
Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances.
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain
current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not
account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act,
King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make
adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of
the District.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District.
Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect
changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity
calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities.
(continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 2
I Executive Summary (continued)
The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District
standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The
District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and
the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for
Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity.
Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is
electronically reported monthly to the Once of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on
Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a
widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's
enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI.
The Board of Directors approved Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") for all
Elementary Schools in 2011-12 and FDK projections are used to forecast
Kindergarten enrollment in future years.
The District received authorization from the Office of Superintendent of Public
Instruction to temporarily re -open the former Kent Elementary School at 317
Fourth Ave South in Kent. This facility will be used to house the kindergarten and
early child education classes for both Kent and Neely -O'Brien Elementary
Schools to alleviate overcrowding at those schools. This building re -opened in fall
2014 as the Kent Valley Early Learning Center.
The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of
transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The
District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the
transitional use of portables.
A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's
ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth
Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the impact
fee schedules adjusted accordingly.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 3
11 Six - Year Enrollment Projection
For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort
survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected
over the next six years. (see Tabta 2, page s) The student generation factor is the basis
for the growth projections from new developments. (see Page 5)
King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used
to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see rebte s, page 7)
8.98% of 24,514 King County live births in 2010 is projected for 2,202 students
expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2015. This is an decrease of 543 live
births in King County over the previous year. (see Tabiez pagea)
Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") programs at all 28 elementary schools require an
adjustment to the Kindergarten forecast for projecting FDK at 1.0 FTE for capital
facilities planning. P-223 Reports will continue to include FDK students at 1.0 for
twelve schools with FDK funded by state apportionment, and all other
kindergarten students will be reported at .50 FTE for state funding in 2014-2015.
Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE°), "Preschool
Inclusive Education ("IE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately
on Form P -223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve
students in the ECE programs at elementary schools.
The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 2-3% larger than
the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from
private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to
forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Projections for
October 1, 2015-2020 are from OSPI Report 1049 — Determination of Projected
Enrollments.
Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments.
The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to
schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of
these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the
District's future analysis of growth projections.
The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated
King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller
portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley
(Continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 4
11 Six - Year Enrollment Projection (continued)
STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR
"Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a
school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected
to be generated by a dwelling unit' based on district records of average actual
student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is
as follows:
Single Family Elementary .257
Middle School .070
Senior High .138
Total .465
Multi -Family Elementary .111
Middle School .022
Senior High .039
Total .172
The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,867 single family
dwelling units and 966 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for
occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities
Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey.
In preparing the 2015-2016 to 2020-2021 Capital Facilities Plan the District
contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California,
a noted expert: in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and
prepare the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single family
residences than the district did in previous plans and included both "garden" and
"urban style" apartments in the calculation for multi -family residences.
Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance,
elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each
side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking
located beneath the building, retail may or may not be included with the building.
If there is retail it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments
seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children.
(Continued)
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 5
I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued)
Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have
more three bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate
more students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club
houses, swimming pools and places for children to play.
The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the
student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come
from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be
included in mix of mufti -family housing units.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2018 Page 6
m
W
N
W
O
h
o w
N
N'
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m
W
O
N
O
N m
V
0
0
0
0
O
m
v M
N
N
w w
�
h
O
m
O
V
N
W
MOp
N
�
h
to
CW'1
M
tOtl
V
O
W
O
m
N
N
�
N
N
N
N
N
n
N
N
N
N
N
ovi
m
co
N
M O
O
� n
N
N
O
0
N
m w
O
M
W
G
M
W
O
O
M
O
O
M
N
N Tc6
w v
M
tp
h
m
h
r
h
p
r
n
0
�
W
m
W
W
O
0
O
N
O
app
O
N
N
N
c9
V
W
rD
W
c0
M
O
O
O>
W
O
O
O
ry
O
m
O
M
n
o
to
W
M
N
M
tm
fp
�
N
tD
N
h
wcoN
N
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
w
M
W
M
h
h
N
O
O
r
N
C9
N
N
O
W
O
h
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
P
O
N
0
N
Op
In
N
fp
W
tm
N
W
N
N
N
C6
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
o
o
N
W
ttl
h
h
M
fm
h
W
O
O
O
ap
nv
N N
N
NN v
ro
W
N
N
N
N
N
m
pp
r
NI
N
tV
r
N
C12L
N
a
a
m
R
r
N
M
c
d
a
a
B
-°o
a
a
v
w
v
a
v
TO
'g
a
t6
m
W
�
o
TO
w�
G
T
20
2
R
T
2
E
Y
r
Y
0
0
(D
C9
CD
0
U'
U'
C9
C9
(9
C7
~
} v
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
SIX -YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION
Full Dav Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 200B LB in 2009 LB in 2010 Is in 2011 LB in 2012 LB Ed. 2013 LB Est 2n14
ACTUAL
P R O J E C T 1 0 N
24,514
October 2014
2015
2016
2017
11 2018
2019
2020
-543
116
King County Live Births'
25,057
24,514
24,630
25,032
25,890
26,490
26,998 1
Increase / Decrease
323
-543
116
402
858
600
508
Kindergarten/ Birth % 2
8.34%
8.98%
9.160%
9.23%
9.13%
9.130/.
9.16%
FD Kindergarten @ 1.0
2090
2,202
2,256
2,310
2,364
2,419
2,473
Grade 1
2127
2,139
2,253
2,309
2,364
2,419
2,475
Grade 2
2190
2,140
2,152
2,266
2,323
2,378
2,433
Grade 3
2070
2,229
2,178
2,190
2,306
2,364
2,420
Grade 4
1956
2,082
2,241
2,190
2,202
2,319
2,377
Grade 5
2116
1,977
2,104
2,265
2,213
2,225
2,343
Grade 6
2023
2,155
2,015
2,144
2,308
2,255
2,267
Grade 7 2104 2,030 2,163 2,022 2,152 2,317 2,263
Grade 8 2091 2,127 2,052 2,186 2,044 2,175 2,342
Grade
9
2428
2,401
2,442
2,356
2,510
2,347
2,497
Grade
10
2151
2,129
2,104
2,140
2,065
2,200
2,057
Grade
11
1802
1,911
1,891
1,869
1,901
1,835
1,954
Grade
12
1576
1,478
1,567
1,551
1,533
1,559
1,505
Total Enrollment Projection 3 26,724 27,000 27,418 27,798 28,285 28,812 29,406
Yearly Increase/Decrease 3 276 418 380 487 527 594
Yearly Increase/Decrease % 1.03% 1.55% 1.39% 1.750% 1.86% 2.06%
Total Enrollment Projection 1 26,724 1 27,798 28,285 28,812 29,406
1 Kindergarten enrollment projection for 2015 is based on Kent SD percentage of live births in King County five years previous.
2 Kindergarten projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births five years earlier
compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education preschoolers)
3 Headcount Projections for 2015 - 2020 from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments
4 Oct. 2014 P223 Headcount is 26,724 & FTE 25,888.84. Full Headcount with ECE Preschool & Running Start students = 28,090
G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors
For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enrollment
growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 June 2015 Page 8
III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service"
In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County
Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must
establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service
identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students
and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which
would best serve the student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District.
The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as
"impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those
facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of
service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, e & c)
The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent
School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined
with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will
affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will
be reflected in future capital facilities plans.
Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students
Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 or fewer students.
Class size for Kindergarten and grades 1 and 2, for schools that qualify for high
poverty funding (18 elementary schools for 2015-16) is planned for an average of
20 or fewer students.
All elementary schools meet the criteria required to provide full day kindergarten
programs (FDK = Full Day Kindergarten) with the second half of the day funded
by state apportionment or the Educational Programs and Operations Levy.
Twelve schools with FDK Programs have state apportionment funding.
Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program
capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some
students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to
receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve
these programs.
Some students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be
provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or
facility.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 9
Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in
classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows:
English Language Learners (E L L)
Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program
Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program
Highly Capable Students -State Program
Reading, Math or Science Labs
Dual Language Programs in 4 elementary schools
Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with
disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes
with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program:
Early Childhood Education (ECE) -3-4 yr. old students with disabilities
Tiered Intervention in Inclusive Education Support Center Programs
Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance)
Self-contained Inclusive Education Support Center Programs (SC)
School Adjustment Programs for students with behavioral disorders (SA)
Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (Asc-Do)
Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students
Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT)
The Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old secondary students
Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these
programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances,
these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When
programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program
and capacity.
Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and
educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the
capacity of the school buildings.
Class size for grades 7 — 8 is planned for an average of 28.6 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 9 — 12 is planned for an average of 30.6 or fewer students.
Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary
programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program
capacity of the permanent school buildings.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 10
Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational
opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows:
Computer, Multi -Media & Technology Labs & Programs
Technology Academy at Kent -Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School
Science Programs & Labs - Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography,
Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc.
English Language Learners (E L L)
Music Programs - Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc.
Art Programs - Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc.
Theater Arts - Drama, Stage Tech, etc.
Journalism and Yearbook Classes
Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs
International Baccalaureate (°I W) Program
JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps
Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE - Vocational Education)
Family & Consumer Science - Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/ChildrentEduc., etc.
Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs
Health & Human Services - Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc.
Business Education - Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math,
Marketing, Economics, Web Design, DELA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders).
Technical & Industry - Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals,
Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Drafting, Drawing, CAD
(Computer-aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, ASL, etc.
Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag &
Horticulture.
Kent Phoenix Academy - Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High
School & Kent Success program with evening classes for credit retrieval.
Space or Classroom Utilization
As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized
rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space
during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of
regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual
utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization
rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools
reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 11
Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,489 students
and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,539. This capacity is based on the
Districts Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is
an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (see
Table 3 on Page 13). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is
96.6%-3.4%.
The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional
classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to
reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2014.
For the 2014-15 school year and beyond the state has mandated lower class
sizes in 18 elementary schools that are classified as high poverty. The new class
size in grades K-1 and 2 will be 20 students for every teacher.
Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are
set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on
Page 14.
For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional
programs for students in Kent School District;
Kent Mountain View Academy serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and
home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School
in the western part of the district in Des Moines. This school was originally
designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for
this Plan.
Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fall
2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle
School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the
Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success.
iGrad - In partnership with Green River College, Kent School District has
pioneered the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad
offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high
school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this
Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza
Shopping Center. Over the past two years, enrollment in the iGrad program has
averaged over 300 students.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 12
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 June 2015 Page 13
20142015
Year
SCHOOL
openad
ABR
ADDRESS
Program
Ca aci
Carriage Crest Elementary
1990
CC
18235 -140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
456
Cedar Valley Elementary
1971
CV
26500 Timbedane Way SE, Covington 98042
364
Covington Elementary
1961
CO
17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042
488
Crestwood Elementary
1980
CW
25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
432
East Hill Elementary
1953
EH
9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031
466
Emerald Park
1999
EP
11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031
484
Fairwood Elementary
1969
FW
16800 -148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
408
George T. Daniel Elementary
1992
DE
11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030
428
Glenridge Elementary
1995
GR
19405 -120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058
436
Grass Lake Elementary
1971
GL
28700 -191 at Place BE, Kent 98042
438
Horizon Elementary
1990
HE
27641 -144th Avenue SE Kent 98042
477
Jenkins Creek Elementary
1987
JC
26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
459
Kent Elementary
1999
KE
24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032
460
Kent Valley Early Learning Center
2014
KV
317 —4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032
336
Lake Youngs Elementary
1965
LY
19660 -142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042
524
Martin Sortun Elementary
1987
MS
12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030
452
Meadow Ridge Elementary
1994
MR
27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030
440
Meridian Elementary
1939
ME
25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042
524
Millennium Elementary
2000
ML
11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030
484
Neely -O'Brien Elementary
1990
NO
6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032
460
Panther Lake Elementary
2009
PL
20831 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
504
Park Orchard Elementary
1963
PO
11010 BE 232nd Street, Kent 98031
476
Pine Tree Elementary
1967
PT
27825 -118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030
477
Ridgewood Elementary
1987
RW
18030 -162nd Place SE, Renton 98058
504
Sawyer Woods Elementary
1994
SW
31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010
486
Scenic Hill Elementary
1960
SH
26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030
448
Soos Creek Elementary
1971
SC
12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031
342
Spdngbmok Elementary
1969
SB
20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
418
Sunrise Elementary
1992
SR
22300 -132nd Avenue BE, Kent 98042
543
Elementary TOTAL
13,214
Cedar Heights Middle School
1993
CH
19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042
895
Mattson Middle School
1981
MA
16400 SE 251 at Street, Covington 98042
787
Masker Middle School
1970
MK
12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058
832
Meridian Middle School
1958
MM
23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031
792
Mill Creek Middle School
2005
MC
620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032
916
Northwood Middle School
1996
NW
17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058
926
Middle School TOTAL
8,148
Kent -Meridian High School
1951
KM
10020 SE 258th Street, Kent 98030
1,904
Kentlake Senior High School
1997
KL
21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042
1,957
Kentndge Senior High School
1968
KR
12430 SE 206th Street, Kent 98031
2,277
Kentwood Senior High School
1981
KW
25800 -164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042
2,159
Senior High TOTAL
8,297
Kent Mountain View Academy
1997
MV/LC
22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98196
414
Kent Phoenix Academy
2007
PH
11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030
416
DISTRICT TOTAL
27,489
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 June 2015 Page 13
n
oa
g�®
LLW
3S eAV
m �
N y u
y®
e a
22 .o
E
S
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2016 Page 14
a
N
a
c
mm
m
a)L
�
mt
O
L
d
�c
y
aa
U2 mE
a
o
� a
0.12
m
m
bs c�
®p
®U®
0�
cm
aE
o CN
E
®W
�O
am
C\,3
3S eAV 94V9I
°
c
pro
M
C;4
to
m
m
m
Mai
•P
�v
W
C
E CR
3S 3(iry' PUZQ I y
2 W 3S aAV PUFT I
W 1
6 0
'aE
a'o� m
2NW
®' Qc1 c ®� e E
y VJ
ay N
/
y 8_
£U aE®}-.W
®641
�}v�
W
25
Y.a
O 0
\�
�/ V
®p
CO O Cn
®
ag �:.W 4i4Di
O
Cn7
O
_®
�
®
C =
a
v
am
C
C C
s
'm
c®
mE
M uiYY
X
co ��
N
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2016 Page 14
V Six-YearPlarmnirg endi Construietto,n Pial
PXt the til ne cif pr eparabon of this Plan in spring of 2015, the following projects to
increase capacity are in the planning phase in Kent School District;
a Planning is in progress for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School in
2018 or beyond. The project is pending satisfactory financial resources to fund the
project.
a Planning is in progress for additional classroom space for Neely -O'Brien Elementary
School. This addition will add approximately 25% to building capacity and is expected to
conte online in fall of 2019 pending satisfactory financial resources to fund the project.
m Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school
level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan.
Q Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact
fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity.
As a critical component of Capital facilities planning, county and city planners and
decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students
when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This
should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus steps as wall
as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses.
Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the
District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Table 4 or Page
16 & Site map on Rags 17)
Doter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of
these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some
funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact
fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction
requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The
Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2015.
2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the
construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther lake
Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impact fees have been
utilized for those projects.
In March 2013 the Board of Directors reallocated the funding for the new elementary
school to capital projects for safety and security.
The Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be
reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan ,June 2016 Page 15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity
SCHOOL 1 FACILITY / SITE I LOCATION T e Status
ProjectedProjetYetl
-A for
Completion
Program
new
Date
Capacity
Growth
"^) ELEMENTARY I
Replacement
5 Replacement for Covington Elementary (U) BE 256th Street & 154th Ave SE Elementary Planning 2018-19 600 16%
Covington Elem - Capacity to be replaced 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Elementary Utilized -504
Elementary
Neely -O'Brien Elementary School - Addition (U) 6300 S 236th Street, Kent 98032 Addition Planning 2019.20 600 25%
Classrooms added to provide New Capacity Current Capacity 480 + 120 New = 600 Planning
MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH
No new projects required for Secondary Schools at this time & Secondary Schools are excluded from Impact Fee formula.
TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additonal
Capacity
Portables' TBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2015+ m- 31 each 100%
..I s OTHER SITES ACQUIRED
4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS)
5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom)
3 Ham Lake area (Pollard)
8 BE of Lake Morton area (West property)
2 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Famine)
1 So. King Co. Activity Center (former Nike site)
12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yah-Wma)
BE 251 & 164 BE, Covington 98042
BE 256 & 154 SE, Covington 98042
16820 SE 240, Kent 98042
BE 332 & 204 BE, Kent 98042
17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058
BE 167 & 170 BE, Renton 98058
BE 286th St & 124th Ave BE, Auburn 98092
gena vac
Land Use
oasiartation
Type
Judsdiction
Urban
Elementary City of Covington
Urban
Elementary y of Covington
Rural
Elementary King County
Rural
Secondary King County
Urban
Elementary King County
Rural
TBD 2 King County
Urban
TBD' King County
Notes:
h Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future.
TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined.
a Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 17. Other Map site locations are parcels Identified in Table 7 on Page 28.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 June 2015 Page 16
�
�
-S17P4
d
CA
!
E
-<
/®
/
mom__
\
>
�
7
\ \
\
E
a
k
V
Kent School DistrictSix-Year Capi_ Facilities_ June 2016 m,=
ME
o
Cr
0
m
o
-S17P4
d
CA
!
E
-<
/®
/
mom__
\
>
�
7
\ \
\
E
a
k
V
Kent School DistrictSix-Year Capi_ Facilities_ June 2016 m,=
The Plan references use of portable as interim or transitional capacity and
facilities.
Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of
permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations. (Please
see Appendices A B C D)
Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten
programs, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the
District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the
next six-year period.
During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that
all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the
useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in
some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the
flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community.
Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities:
1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school
facilities.
2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased
capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet
that demand.
3. To meet unique program requirements.
Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in
some being improved and some replaced.
The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim
housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their
impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the
interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies and educational
restructuring will continue to be examined.
Kent School District Six -Year Capttal Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 18
VII Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity
As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for
changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations, grade level
splits, etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13,
the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison
charts. (See Tables 5 & 5 A -B -C on pages 20-23)
Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis
and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first
school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time"
to report enrollment for the year.
Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of
Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2014 was 26,724 with kindergarten
students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start
students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2014 totals 28,090
which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students.
In October there were 826 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the
Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both
high school and college graduation. 459 of these students attended classes only
at the college ("college -only') and are excluded from FTE and headcount for
capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest
Running Start program participation rates in the state.
Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity,
current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom
space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through
the transitional use of portables. (see Table 5 and Tables 5A -B -C on Pages 20-23)
This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There
may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate
growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate
placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and
costly movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and
educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and
underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District.
Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facilities Pian June 2015 Page 19
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
Permanent Program Capacity' 1 27,489
Changes to Permanent Capacity 1
Capacity Increase (F)
Replacement school with projected increase in capacity:
Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 2
To Replace current Covington Elementary capacity
27,489 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,585 27,705
Neely -O'Brien Elementary Addition - Capacity Increase (u) 3
600
-504
120
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,585 27,705 27,705
Interim Portable Capacity 4
Elementary Portable Capacity Required 936
1;632
1,896
2,376
2,688
2,856
3,264
Middle School Portable Capacty Required 7 0
0
0
SCHOOL
YEAR
0
2014-155:[2015-18
Senior High School Portable Capacity Required r 0
2016-17 1
2017-18
1 2018-19
1 2019-20
1
2020-21
936
1,632
Actual
I P R
O
J
E C
T
E
D
Permanent Program Capacity' 1 27,489
Changes to Permanent Capacity 1
Capacity Increase (F)
Replacement school with projected increase in capacity:
Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 2
To Replace current Covington Elementary capacity
27,489 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,585 27,705
Neely -O'Brien Elementary Addition - Capacity Increase (u) 3
600
-504
120
Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,585 27,705 27,705
Interim Portable Capacity 4
Elementary Portable Capacity Required 936
1;632
1,896
2,376
2,688
2,856
3,264
Middle School Portable Capacty Required 7 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Senior High School Portable Capacity Required r 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
936
1,632
1,896
2,376
2,688
2,856
3,264
TOTAL CAPACITY '
TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION s 26,566 27,000 27,418 27,798 28,285 28,812 29,406
DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1,859 2,121 1,967 2,067 1,988 1,749 1,563
' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes
s Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and will be built on a different existing urban site.
3 Addition to Neely -O'Brien Elementary will increase capacity approximately 25%.
4 2014-15 total classroomortable capacity p p Ity is 936. Some additional relocatables used for program purposes.
5 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
Enrollment counts and projections have been adjusted for Full Day Kindergarten at all Elementary Schools.
6 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 June 2016 Page 20
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
SCHOOL YEAR
2014-15
2015-16
1 2016-17
1 2017-18
1 2018-1e
1 2019-20
2020-21
Actual
P R O J E C T E
D
Elementary Permanent Capacity 113,214 13,286 13,286 13,286 13,286 13,382 13,502
Kent Mountain View Academy 2 414
Changes to Elementary Capacity
Kent Valley Early Learning Center
Capacity Increase (F)
Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 3 600
Will replace current Covington Elementary capacity -504
Neely -O'Brien Elementary Addition Capacity Increase tu) 4
Subtotal 13,628
Portable Capacity Required' 936
120
13,286 13,286 13,286 13,382 13,502 13,502
1632 1896 2376 2688
2,856 3,264
Adjusted for FULL Day Kindergarten Headcount
ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 14,572 14,924 15199 15,674 16,080 16.379 16.788
NUmber of Portables Required 39 68 79 99 112 119 136
125 Classroom Portables required in 2019-20. Some additional portables used for program purposes.
1 Capacity is based on standard of service for
programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades 3 - 12.
The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school.
a Replacement school for Covington Elementarywill increase capacity and is planned for a different existing urban site -
4 Addition to Neely -O'Brien Elementary will increase capacity approximately 26%.
' Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools Q 1.0 & exclude ECE Preschoolers.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 A June 2015 Page 21
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
MIDDLE SCHOOL ® Grades 7 e 8
Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
No Changes to Middle Sehool Capacity
Subtotal 5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
Portable Capacity Required' 0
SCHOOL YEAR
201495
2015-15
1 2016.17
2017-18
201819
2019-20
1 2020-21
Aauai
P R O J E C T E
D
5,148
5,148
5,148
Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148
No Changes to Middle Sehool Capacity
Subtotal 5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
Portable Capacity Required' 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL CAPACITY '13
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
5,148
ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION z 1 4,195 4.157
196
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY ° 1 953 991 933 940 952 656 543
Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes.
' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
9 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004.
Middle School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for middle schools
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 13 June 2015 Page 22
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
SENIOR HIGH ® Grades 9 ®1 2
Senior High Permanent Capacity' 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713
Includes Kent Phoenix Academy Z
No Changes to High School Capacity
Subtotal 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713
Portables Capacity Required 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SCHOOL YEAR
2014-15
2015-16
1 2016-17
1 2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
Actual
P R O J E C T E
D
Senior High Permanent Capacity' 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713
Includes Kent Phoenix Academy Z
No Changes to High School Capacity
Subtotal 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713
Portables Capacity Required 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL CAPACITY '
8,713
8,713
8,713
8,713
8.713
8.713
8.713
ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 1 7,958 7,919 8.004 7
VAL&lil
SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 755 794 709 797 704 772 701
Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes.
' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.
2 Kent Phoenix Academyo in Fall 2007 serving opened p g grades 9 - 12 with four special programs.
3 Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.
` High School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for high schools
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Tattle 5 C June 2015 Page 23
VIII Finance Pian
The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to
finance improvements for the years 2015-16 through 2020-21. The financing
components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based
on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth
Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental
Policy Act.
In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue that included funds for
replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity, as well as
construction of a new Elementary School to accommodate growth. The new Panther
Lake Elementary School replaced the previous Panther Lake Elementary in Fall of 2009.
The bond issue also funded Phase II of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and
renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguration as a non-traditional high school,
Kent Phoenix Academy, which opened in September 2007.
2006 construction funding also provided for additional classrooms at Kentlake High
School and two projects at Kent -Meridian HS. The projects at Kent -Meridian provide
additional capacity with several new classrooms and gymnasium space. The projects at
K -M are completed and the new Main Gym added capacity for two more PE classrooms.
Some impact fees were utilized for new construction that increased capacity.
Originally, the district designated $16 million of the 2006 bond authorization toward the
construction of an additional elementary school, identified as Elementary #31 in previous
Plans. Due to a change in circumstances, the Board of Directors reallocated the $16
million for capital projects for safety and security.
Replacement of Covington Elementary School in 2016-19 or beyond will increase
capacity of ther current school by approximately 16%. Some impact fees will be utilized
as part of the Finance Plan.
A building addition is also planned to provide approximately 25% additional classroom
capacity at Neely -O'Brien Elementary School in 2019-20. Some impact fees will be
utilized as part of the Finance Plan.
The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide
additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees.
Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level
and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 24
VIII Finance Plan
of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this
Plan.
For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent
School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 26-27 for a summary of the cost
basis.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 25
`i
L
�
o
o
uni
r
n
o
n
m
m
m
E
m
m
m
E
a
-
ui
ai
M
Ni
-
LL
W
F9
f9
m®
a
a
o
0
d
o
0
0
m
m
O
f9
a
R
m
y
U
N
_meq
O
O
J
Q
N
O
m
mM
O
M
r
F
04
fR
r
M
b>
N
m 4
M r
M
O
N a
N
E
WCt
a
o
m
ri
M
O
O
M
O
N
W C
q
m
Y
d
d
6
N
r
c
C6 w
m
d
v
m
o
o a
o
o
a
0 3
0'm
MO
o
m
0
N
m g
m
d
c
o
s
-0
» a
q
a
2
E
E
m
a
w
c
`w
U
U
w
1[J
9q
m
C
pm
$
Q
C
L
N
p
tJ
O
C
N
Om d
mm
S
J
N
�
N
m
Yf th
y�
LL
m
�
a
c
O
a
ro
N
rz
'dLu
rq
u
8
t
U
Q
d
c
a
Q
R
CL
M
m
m
m
R
m
B
0O
W
m
O
Z
mcr
_
fn
❑
d
y'j
Q
W
cUry
W
W
c
g
W
$
LL
c
F
gu
n
ami
�
a8a��
lQ
F
m
Fr
ii
U
LL
>
LL
O
r
n
Y
Y
Z
`i
Vill Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summam
For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last
elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next
elementary school.
Elementary School
Cost
Projected Cost
Cost of Panther Lake Elementary
$26,700,000
Replacement (Opened in Fall 2009)
Projected cost - Covington Elementary
$35,025,000
Replacement (Projected to open in 2018)
I
Projected cost of Neely -O'Brien Addition
$15,500,000
(Projected to open in 2018)
Elementary Cost based on
$35,025,000
Covington Elementary Replacement
Site Acquisition Cost
The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built
on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 28 for a list of site
acquisition costs and averages.
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 27
N
a
0
O
M
R
®
R
O
ti
z
N
¢
OD
Cam(ppo
w
W
2
N
�
M
m4O
V
r
M00
co
m
P
r
O
co
N
h
P
CD
t0
M
O
M
O
W
W
W
O
O
O
O
0)
°
00
m^
et
O
O_
a
M
U
V
O
In
co
I
M
M
H
`a
n
05
O
M
m
N
N
M
0
444
R
N
m
W
`o
W
a
m
to
N
W
W
i
fq
fry
N
(Wry
d
CN N
O
m
m
O
O
O
N
m
On
N
N
N
00
A
W
W
W
W
W
ONi
W
N
¢
R
O
Y
CCC
O
6
E
z
...
O
o
W
to
v
L
C
Q
`m
emi
m
to
(Yp
S
y
y
a
w
=
d
s
w
m
N
0
12
T �p
E
?
z
~
h
z
n
m
uto
g
Po
N
v
N
N
a
0
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generation Factors - Single Family
Elementary
(Grades K - 6)
0.257
Middle School
(Grades 7 - 8)
0.070
Senior High
(Grades 9 - 12)
0.138
Total
0.465
Projected Increased Student Capacity
Elementary 1632
Middle School 0
Senior High Addition 0
Required Site Acreage per Facility
Elementary (required) 11
Middle School (required) 21
Senior High (required) 32
New Facility Construction Cost
Elementary' $35,025,000
Middle School $0
Senior High ' $0
" See cost basis on Pg. 26
Temporary Facility Square Footage
Elementary
85,615
Middle School
8,064
Senior High
20,400
Total 3.4%
114,079
Permanent Facility Square Footage
Elementary (Includes KMVA)
1,470,543
Middle School
660,904
Senior High
1,110,415
Total 96.6%
3,241,862
Total Facilities Square Footage
Elementary
1,556,158
Middle School
667,829
Senior High
1,130,815
Total
3,354,802
Developer Provided Sites / Facilities
Value 0
Dwelling Units 0
Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family
Elementary
0.111
Middle School
0.022
Senior High
0.039
Total
0.172
1111111, Y_: Ilf.". - .- , I -
Elementary
90
Middle School
117
Senior High
130
Special Education
144
Average Site Cost / Acre
Elementary $287,573
Middle School $0
Senior High $0
Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost
Elementary @ 24 $200,000
Middle School @ 29 $0
Senior High @ 31 $0
State Funding Assistance Credit (sa many staerescm°)
District Funding Assistance Percentage 57.47%
CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. (Effective July 2014) $200.40
District Average Assessed Value
Single Family Residence $288,605
District Average Assessed Value
Multi -Family Residence $114,153
Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000
Current / $1,000 Tax Rate (1.6842) $1.41
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
Current Bond Interest Rate 3.68%
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 29
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION fcr SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Acres x cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor
A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 600 0.257 $1,354.95
A2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.070 $o
A3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0.138 $0
0.465
A$1,354.95
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footaae Ratio)
B 1 (Elementary) $35,025,000 600 0.257 0.966 $14,492.29
B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0.070 0.966 $0
B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 0.138 0.966 $0
0.465 $ 41 $14,492.29
Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary /Total Sauafe Footaae Ratio)
C 1 (Elementary) $200,000 24 0.257
0.034
$72.82
C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.070
0.034
$0
C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.138
0.034
$o
0.465
C b
$72.82
State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match')
D `y
Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor
Tax Credit per Single Family Residence
D 1 (Elementary) $200.40 90
0.5747
0.257
$2,663.88
D 2 (Middle School) $200.40 117
0
0.070
$0
D 3 (Senior High) $200.40 130
00.138
$0
D `y
$2,663.88
Tax Credit per Single Family Residence
Average SF Residential Assessed Value
$288,605
Current Debt Service Rate! $1,000
$1.41
Current Bond Interest Rate
3.68%
Years Amortized (10 Years)
10
TC b
$3,276.08
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value
Dweliin Units
0
0
FC b
0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
Subtotal
D = State Match Credit per Residence
TC = Tax Credit per Residence
Subtotal
$1,354.95
$14,492.29
$72.82
$15,920.06
$2,663.88
$3,276.08
$5,939.96
Total Unfunded Need $9,980.10
50% Developer Fee Obligation $4,990
FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0
Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $4,990
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 30
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE
Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/ Facility Capacity) x Student(
I Required Site Acreage I Average Site Co
A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573
A2 (MiddleSchool) 21 $0
A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0
Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanen'
600
0.111
$585.21
1,065
0.022
$0
1,000
0.039
$0
$0
0.172
0.022
0.964
A 4,
$58531
B 1
(Elementary)
$35,025,000
600
0.111
0.964
$6,246.36
B 2
(Middle School)
$0
1,065
0.022
0.964
$0
B 3
(Senior High)
$0
1,600
0.039
0.964
$0
Tax Credit per Mufti -Family Residence Unit
0.172
B 41
$6,246.36
Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit
Current Debt Service Rate 1$1,000
$1.41
Formula: ((Facility Cost/ Facility Capa '
) x Student Factor) x (temporary 1 Total Square Footage Ratio)
3.68%
Fedltty Gust
FatlRty Gapadty
Studerrt Factor
Footage Ratio
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value
C 1
(Elementary)
$200,000
24
0.111
0.034
$31.45
C 2
(Middle School)
$0
29
0.022
0.034
$0
C 3
(Senior High)
$0
31
0.039
0.034
$0
0.172
C:
$31.45
State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi -Family Residence (formerly "State Match')
Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Fast per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor
I Area Coat Allowance
I SPI Sq. Ft / Student I
Equalization % I
Student Factor
D 1 (Elementary) $200.40 90
0.5747
0.111
$1150.55
D 2 (Middle School) $200.40 117
0
D.022
$0
D 3 (Senior High) $200.40 130
0
0.039
$0
D b
$1,150.55
Tax Credit per Mufti -Family Residence Unit
Average MF Residential Assessed Value
$114,153
Current Debt Service Rate 1$1,000
$1.41
Current Bond Interest Rate
3.68%
Years Amortized (10 Years)
10
TC b
$1,386.90
Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value
DwePo Units
0
0
FC b
0
Fee Recap
A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit
B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit
C - Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit
Subtotal
D = State Match Credit per MF Unit
TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit
Subtotal
$585.21
$6,246.36
$31.45
$6,663.02
$1,150.55
$1,386.90
$2,537.45
Total Unfunded Need $4,325.57
50% Developer Fee Obligation $2,163
FC - Facility Credit (if applicable) 0
Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi -family $2,163
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2015 Page 31
The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Pians in
effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2014 Plan are summarized here.
Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program
changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase,
sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities.
The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools
now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously
modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all Elementary
schools.
The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state
matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually.
Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future.
Due to the decrease in the student generation factor for both single family and multi-
family housing the District is reducing the impact fees for both classes. For single family
housing the fee will be $4,990 from $5,486 a decrease of $496 or 9%. For multi -family
the fee will be $2,163 from $3,378 a decrease of $1,215 or 36%.
Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include:
Student Generation Factor
Elam
0.484
0.257
Single Family (SF)
MS
0.129
0.070
SH
0.249
0.138
Total
0.866
0.465
-.401
Student Generation Factor
Elam
0.324
0.111
Multi -Family (MF)
MS
0.066
0.022
SH
0.118
0.039
Total
0.522
0.172
-.350
State Funding Assistance Ratios Mtata Match')
58.14%
57.47%
Per OSPI website
Area Cost Allowance (former Boeckh Index)
$200.40
$200.40
Per DSPI website
Average Assessed Valuation (AV)
SF
$245,871
$288,605
Puget Sound ESD
AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts.
MF
$87,880
$114,153
Puget Sound ESD
Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000
$1.68
$1.41
Per King Co. Assessor Report
General Obligation Bond Interest Rate
4.04%
4.68%
Bloomberg Bond Buyer Index
Impact Fee - Single Family
SF
$5,486
$4,990
Decrease of $496 or 9%
Impact Fee - Multi -Family
MF
$3,378
$2,163
Decrease of $1,215 or 36%
Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 32
U)
J
N
V Q
Z
O
(L
50 U 'p
5O r
J Z
O >
U ,
f/J
r _
W U
Y a
U
I„
E
mO
c w
e U
R w
Q� O
D a
C Z
Y m
N
6 N
m �
C q
O N
N �
m
2 m
M o
N
LL U
d
o a
r w
� W
Y
� a
LL O
U) d
b m
N C
U Q
a
2 E X
v o
0, o Z
v 3 N W
Q 7 a
m Y Q
N d N
ti
m �
IL
To n 'm
y O N
N
R c m
mm U
m y a
O R
n m t
Y c >
oLL == a
s L
c m =
L C R
R O a
N y,
C m
Y o �
u
m m
O � �
m o a
r m m m
> a
O m LL
m L L n
`C U
R m N U
m R O
Edi, }
X
d m m m
w W Fj
R v in C
0
O
L
m
VI
m
Y
z
T}
z}
T
z T}
z} Z
Y
T
z
T}
z}}}}}
z z
T
T
T
z
2
S p
a
p 0O w
o
C
N
N
w
n
m
W
o
O
0
b
o
O
e
O
o
b
0 0
m O
o e M
W O
o
O
0
O
0
O
0 0
b O
0
N
o
O
e
O
e
O
e
O
o
O
M W
O A
o
O
0
W
o
O
W
N
o
l7
ro
N
p W C
o F m
N LL E
M
Q
m
m
N
N
p
C@
m
N
OaI
r m
W
m W M
Q
Q
m
O
W
M
N
y
O
,fl M1
O
O
m
p
p
N
a
w
ai
m
T
$
m
N
m
O
Q
O
W
m
W
W Q
Q
p N O
N
O
O
N W
f0
W
p
V
0
W
C
W O
O
MW
WpJ
N
T
�
U
O N
o
i/,
m
-
R
U
O
LL
E m
a
a°
n
E
N
Q
W
N
W
Q
W
W W
O N
W
M
W A 0)
M A
O
b
M
p
N
N O
b
y
N
gg
O
y
O
W
A
A
A
R M
O m
gg
N
W
M
m
m
Q
O�
p
M
N
Y
a
U
N
W
W
Q
b
N
M W
Q
p N M1
M
O
r
M b
M
M
W
b
M1
p
� N
b
Q
p
N
M
N
a
w U
m
n
R
U
�
m
a
m
U
VV
V
Q
p Q p
p
M
N
p M
Yl
Q
Q
Q
Q
V
p
M
M
Q
m
M
aj
m
b
m
m
�
Z
a
N
U
U
U
W
W
S
Y
Y
2
6
S¢
N
Q
U
U
O
U -Ui
F
N
N
N
U
E
a
r
E
C
❑
H
O
W
R
Y
W
m
0
T
N
G
N
m
T
; y
E
W
b
Y
E
$
Y
Y
N
C
w
U
e
a
6
m
Y Wi
E
m
L¢
w
E
rO
aa° 3om=
yao
re
m
E
°
`
m
$mE
,
W
U
N
N
No
OW
Y
E
mO
c w
e U
R w
Q� O
D a
C Z
Y m
N
6 N
m �
C q
O N
N �
m
2 m
M o
N
LL U
d
o a
r w
� W
Y
� a
LL O
U) d
b m
N C
U Q
a
2 E X
v o
0, o Z
v 3 N W
Q 7 a
m Y Q
N d N
ti
m �
IL
To n 'm
y O N
N
R c m
mm U
m y a
O R
n m t
Y c >
oLL == a
s L
c m =
L C R
R O a
N y,
C m
Y o �
u
m m
O � �
m o a
r m m m
> a
O m LL
m L L n
`C U
R m N U
m R O
Edi, }
X
d m m m
w W Fj
R v in C
0
O
L
m
VI
m
Y
W
2
O
LU
h
}:3
Ld
ul
Q
Z
4
G
w
UA
f
LL
O
IL
W
U3
O
Q
PI
eA7
O
Q
7
N
O
N
p
0 �
O
O
fh
O
O
OJ
O
(0
6i
ISl
Q
6J 6
N
y c
mm
Q � c
m
E
O
O d C
I W
Q � t
Q F
N 4.
a W
m
w
m N
Y
N
bd
�
U
m
O
V
O
Ol
l
W
[0
O
E m
V
N
m
D
a
N
O
r
O
s
N
O
Q
C W
m
d
E m
p� 4
j
N
N
N
O
V
O
O
a`
a°
�O
N
e
O
M
O
ro
p
N
m
N
P
U
[0
atyy
W
N
N
P
�
W `ry
N
0
p�
m0
a
om
m
m
$'
m
E
w
a
U
M
.-
Q
cn
a
o
E
o
a
Q
W
�
n
O
2?
m
M
T
O
N
W
W
V
/O
M
4
N
4i
N
O
c7
m
Q
W
N
M
M
a
V
a 11 3
U
Z
a
C�'a
T
a
R
o
�
a
O
O
a
{S.m4
to
m
S
h
PI
eA7
O
O
E
N
y c
mm
Q � t
E
Y
N
o
U
O
V
O
Ol
l
W
[0
O
V
p
ry
Q
N
c
(V
N
ri
C W
�O
N
e
O
M
O
ro
p
N
m
N
Ti T
[0
atyy
W
N
lV
P
r
W `ry
N
m
N
m
�
V
m
n
O
2?
,tLL,Q
T
O
N
M
N
U
O
a
a
a
�
Q
E
W
IZ
4
5
E a
UUmm
r
r0
N
h
L
O
6
Q
R
N
M
Q
Q
N
CN
�p
V
o
€
w
'w
o
v
m
u ®
N
Ez
m
_
O
E
N
N
N
m
N
N
¢
m
N
J
2
E
L
m
2
LD
w
L
y
h
m
x
m
g
a
o
o
NcN
c
C
mem
Ym
1m
¢
N
p
5
Y
Y
Y
O
O
E
N
f
1
0
k
,
°
,CL
—
/ON
_
!
§
§
)
^
(
!
0
/
46)
�
_CL
�
E\f
Elk
�
Z5ƒ
•
)
a /
— a } , \ %
§ ) { f } }
|
ƒ ® | t - _
f
1
:+gpQm C5
000So25 0 N
o d o o 0 06od88 j6+od6 o0
d o d o d
_
pp pp SS 88 pppp pppp pppp 11pp 88 OpOp SS pp�� pp pp pppp SS pppp pp pp SS SS pppp 88
G O N O p O O p p O N O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 S O 0
M
0 0 p p O 0 0 p 0 0 0 0
O d O d d d C d C O d d 0 0 0 0 0 0 d O 0 0 0 0 0 G Ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d C 0 0
g
mbo SRR
S o Al QQ8
m Y g 25 �m oso 25 ry O o o
£
dgo dgo $^$ §
dnm 0N
c o o d d d d d o d d o d d o 0 d O a o d O o p o o 0 o o d
a
w
Q gg g QQ Q gg
a o m 25 In g o g m$ g N $N. urvi, v g$$ N a e 25 w o g o 3$$ r
0
F
N
H_
E
a
W
N
m
0
F
c
e
a
c
Z
a
0
�
0
a o
O
� 2
E
d nn o >
a¢
m c5� u a a L L L g 0
u u u u v u 8 8 3 u�
I
A,
O O a O a a M R N 4 S 8 0 0 0 N O ee M O N N O - - O- N O O N§§ O O O ti O
N
O O
G O G C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci C C O O Ci O Ci 0 0 0 0 0 C G C C C 0
x
O O O N N O 0 M O S O O S
y�
O O O �M-1 0 0 0 0 0 en -1 p OO O O O O O O O O O O O O
C O C O O O O C O O O O O O O O G Ci Ci 0 0 0 G O G O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0
8 S pp app S oy p Af S 8 �p S S p p 8 pp
S S
E
O O O O O O O O O O O 4 a
o 0 o c o o c c o o a c c o o c d c o c o 0 0 o c c o o o o o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0
a
w
g gg 44 gg q Nqgg
3 g a g si $ o g r a v o g g
%g
.tDc,
a3 n4Oj w 25 Y N 25 2-M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F
N N e1
N_
0 0 0 0 0 0 aY ill N„< O O O O H O M es O N e+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M Lp W
'1 M
0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 o a in
N I(1
E
d
W
+R
O
F
ti M M e'1 N N W If1 O 0 y n
N g n N N N M e'I N N N N N N
p
e1
� p N M
C
C
C
d
M
O
6
� q
O
m N
�'
M 2 N N M A' 3A 3C Gry O wry^, D O
LL
d Z y Z Z ZAt L
t d d N d Z d O d M i Q x �i .� L - AP
N
A u Wy
S C Q1
p>p U U U '3y�
V 'j 9 'i a E N �,hh flr C C y L L L :'� a d C VI y VI i �p N N
V. Ca L
V E E E E E E L° c c c c c
d O LL LO oC OY e0 = 0 0 0 r L ryry Yd Y
W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL IL 4 fY LL I•J V• (J V” U� S S S S S= S S x�� Y Y Y Y Y X y d
I
A,
m .•� o 0 0 0 � 8 g g$ o �sj `d'. g g'^. N `$ n n
w
m o
O O N O O O 0• O O O O O O Ooo O O O O O p G O O
OH O 0• G O C O O O O O o O Ci O Cop O
w O
S S S S O S O en• 81 S O S S O O S 8 8 S
W O O O O g O S O O N O 0 0 m ti S O O
y
O O O O ttmj O O O O O e-�
o 0 0 o d 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a c o 0 0 0
�
88 S 8 pp 88 SS 8 pp C pp 88 p pp a Cod wa{ 88 pp p O N O N O M Q O w S pp S
d
O O O O 'i 0 0
Ci 0 0 0 0 G O O Ci G G O O Ci G G G G C O C Ci O Ci ro 0 0 0 0 O Ci 0 0 0 C O O G 0
8 a o S 8 n D N O� n O? O O O S m p m N $$ M QQ gg M O N O O O M l5� O N O Q
R m 8 n$$ S n 2i o ry
m
R g 25
o o m o 0 0 0 o d 0 d o 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. ry o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d 0 d
u,
x
ve o000o m.-� mN o o 0 00.. o o.-� o o.+v a oo ro.•�.�o a omo 0 o.a o
N
N
d
w
w
O
r
M ei ei N .-1 N ei H S N N V i} N ei
N
C
d
o
d
•
-O -NO � fj C � Vp�I � > 3o OD• � w � y .� y � iry d
LL
S S C V=1 i L L r 00 d J Y C U d 0 00 W 3 d
D Q ^2 0 ul
ap m L
Y g! m Ldu n> a
Z
3a N N m N N d IS C d N
b p C c c EY m =I N
0 C E V L O
d d d d d d a L y C¢ g 9 2 m w> j p
O
D O O O 66° C C
za° A n m
$ O N N N S$ N$
N
O O$ N O O O e! O O O O O O$ O O$ O O O O d O O O H O uOj O
a aa a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p a 0 p d d
x
0 6 g r o o ti$.ai. u o o g o w g g$ o o$$ m$$
N
5 .'._ g$$ S o o$ v❑i $
p 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o d o d 0 a d a a
�
Q ss yy gg QQ QQ 55��
v
w
qqpp88 88��yy 8 pppp 88' 88 88 88 aa 8888 SS 88
0 0 o N 0 O n N 6 6 n d 6 M N N 0$ m$ M N N
q
O O O O 0 0 0 0< O O lal1
O G OO O O O d O O O O O O 6 O O C O O O a O C O O O O G O a O O C OO H O a O O O N 0 O
F
N
x
M
0m m —4-0 m .y
d N N N !1
d
Ya
� O O N� cp T 0 a VI Vl T O„ O ry O m o '1 O W ti o p O W o w H o O n a o W d o Yf ro
m
0
r
CC
N N VI M N M N M
�
N
C
J
C
v
E
a
v o 0
v _
y � >. y 2 � m �- � z❑ a
°'
� �❑ s F r m r� cy E
E
s o o❑ `m
LL
E c a' ''R '^ 3 x i o f w
V 2 ti
W N i N ?�jj m ro Od0 m W L S a R$ �
qC_
p p
1 6 Q C 6 [G K LG 6 K W K CC W VI N Vf m N N 3
X
Z
Q
N d S 1p mM S tMp 8 S pp N M O N
p�
R 8
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
®
O O O O O O O O G C O O e8Y
O
M
A=
p
QQ
8 8 S 8 �ppOpp
8 S 88O
O O O eNi O O O O p O H S
y ,Q
O O S S
�y
y
p O� O�
0 0O O Cl 0 0 Ci Ci O Ci Ci C 0 0 0
L
O Yj O O O O O O u1
a
0
O.
LL
M
p O O Ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 0
F
'Sj
O ti O O S O F N (V O O N n
ry S N
E
N d eWi
o o p o c o
N
17
O O O O N O O O of
ei
y
a
H
c
a
c
w
y
ry ry .mi, .Ni .wi O S V m O N N T n m
dy
pf S S S
o n� ti � Mp S m
N
N
M Vf o O O V
F
�
G
F-
G
µ a ti O d N O O YI O M O M d O N
N
M
O O M N O O N N 1� ei N O m
M
h
11q
Itl
•y
[11
2
M
2
O O •+ .i 0 0 0 ap .-i O O O O N O b�
N
m 0 0 0 0 0 r d M .-� .y O M
e4
!V
N
2
=
W
W
N
~
N
M
w
w
a
w
N
M M M PI M
1O
Po
d rvd w- m n n '-� � e ti .�• �n N .Ni a��
m .� ry O ti ry a r� m� H�
tQ
�
.i�
w
i
y�
vi v
F
h
w
o r E
O LL p
Da
a
a
>
O w
!,
,`, vii N a o
c a mm
a
E79
F y a w
w
U G `• O L' W A C
_
IL
H OaY O 0
C C n
c
1 p! O c 0 'O V O U a II a II
2 O a m N
�.
W 1'e a v a
X
Z
Q
SIX-YEAR
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015-2021
Renton School District No. 403
Board of Directors
Pam Teal, President
Denise Eider, Vice President
Lynn Desmarais
Todd Franceschina
Al Talley
Sheryl Moore, Acting Superintendent
May 27, 2015
SIX-YEAR
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015-2021
Renton School District No. 403
Board of Directors
Pam Teal, President
Denise Eider, Vice President
Lynn Desmarais
Todd Franceschina
Al Talley
Sheryl Moore, Acting Superintendent
The Renton School District Capital Facilities Plan was prepared with the help of the following
organizations and individuals:
Renton School District Staff
John Knutson, Assistant Superintendent, Finance and Operations
Richard Stracke, Executive Director, Facilities and Planning
Stewart Shusterman, Facilities Project Manager
The 2015 – 2021 Capital Facilities Plan was approved by the Renton
School District Board of Directors on May 27, 2015
May 27, 2015
SIX-YEAR
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015-2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
VII. IMPACT FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
VIII. APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 1 -
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) was prepared by Renton School District
(the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable
ordinances of the cities of Renton, Newcastle and Bellevue. It is the intent of the District
that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton
as a sub-element of the Capital Facilities Plan element of their respective Comprehensive
Plans, so that those municipalities may assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of
the District, as empowered by the GMA. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole
planning instrument developed by the District to determine its capital facility needs.
The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing
development; most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area.
The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington’s growth by
developing and implementing comprehensive land-use and transportation plans, by
designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally
critical areas.
One element of the Comprehensive Plan required of county and city governments is the
Capital Facilities Plan. It is this element that addresses existing public facility capacities,
forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or
constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility
improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect
impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private
development.
This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by
examining:
1. anticipated growth of the District’s student population over the next six years;
2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to adequately house those
students based on the District’s current Standard of Service;
3. the need for additional enrollment driven capital facilities;
4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and
5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of
students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors).
This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub-
element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and
the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The District is currently engaged in
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 2 -
dialogue with the City of Tukwila regarding implementation of impact fees within their
jurisdiction.
Enrollment Projections:
Enrollment projections provided by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction
(OSPI), as adjusted by Renton School District, indicate a 14.7% increase in K-12 student
enrollment over the next six years, with the highest growth rate, 20.0%, occurring at the K-
5 level. Projected K-12 enrollment for the 2020-2021 school year is 17,104, an increase of
2,186 over the actual October 1, 2014 headcount of 14,327.
Current Capacity:
Student capacity of current permanent K-12 facilities, excluding designated special
education classrooms and facilities housing special programs, is 15,092. Based on current
enrollment (October 1 headcount), the District is showing a deficit of permanent facilities
at both the Elementary and Middle School levels, while high school facilities enjoy a
comfortable surplus.
Current capacity deficits are overcome by the use of relocatable classrooms (portables),
which are not included in the permanent facility inventory. Relocatable classrooms are
used to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on a temporary basis until
permanent facilities can be constructed. They are not considered a long-term solution for
housing students.
Enrollment Projections/Future Capacity:
Based on the District’s enrollment projections, significant increases are anticipated at all
grade levels over the next six years. Existing surplus capacity at High School facilities
appears sufficient to cover projected student growth at that level. However, growth at the
elementary and middle school levels requires construction of new permanent facilities, as
well as the reallocation of existing, or acquisition of new, relocatable classrooms.
With the passage of the 2012 Bond Measure in April 2012, funding was secured for the
design and construction of the new Middle School No. 4, scheduled to open Fall 2016.
With a student capacity of 850, the new facility will result in a surplus middle school
capacity of 187 in the fall of 2020, based on current enrollment projections,. Those same
enrollment projections indicate that there will be a deficit in the capacity of elementary
school facilities of 2,147 by the year 2020.
While the 2012 bond measure does address the acquisition of property for future
development, funding for design and construction of one or more new elementary schools
will require passage of a future bond initiative. Until such time, current and future deficits
at the elementary level will be accommodated by use of relocatable classrooms.
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 3 -
Capital Construction Plan:
For the next six years, the District’s highest priority will be the construction of new school
facilities to accommodate past and projected growth. This includes; construction of the
new Middle School No. 4, currently in progress and funded by the 2012 bond measure; the
design and construction of two new elementary schools, the focus of a 2016 bond initiative
currently in its early planning stage; acquisition of land for future development; and the
purchase of new portable classrooms.
Other high priority capital improvements fall into five major categories; safety and
security, energy conservation, roofing upgrades, facility enhancements and site
improvements. Improvements will occur district-wide, affecting nearly all District
facilities, achieving and maintaining the level of service necessary to provide safe, healthy,
and nurturing learning environments for all our students. The majority of these projects are
not enrollment driven.
A list summarizing projects covered under the 2012 bond measure is included in the
Appendix. Information on the proposed 2016 bond will become available as the program
develops.
Finance Plan:
The primary funding sources for capital facilities projects over the next six years are the
remaining bond monies from the 2012 and 2008 bond measures, school impact fees
currently being collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and
Renton, state funding available through the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction,
and a future bond initiative.
Impact Fees:
Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621,
Attachment A. Both single and multi-family impact fees have increased over last year’s,
primarily as a result of the re-evaluation of the District’s elementary and middle school cost
models. Equally significant are factors beyond the District’s control that determine the fee,
such as interest rates, assessed values of housing, and the number of students generated by
new residential development.
For the past several years the District has voluntarily limited fee increases to the previous
year’s rate of inflation, as reported by the King County Office of Economic and Financial
Analysis. The rate of inflation for last year, based on the Seattle Consumer Price Index
(CPI-U), was 1.84%. A comparison of current and previous year’s fees is as follows:
Previous Year Current Year Change
Single-Family $5,541 $5,643 $102
Multi-Family $1,360 $1,385 $25
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 4 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 5 -
II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY
STANDARD OF SERVICE
The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that
identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade
level (taking into account the requirements of students with special needs), daily class
schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District to be beneficial in
supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major
determining factor, together with the number of classrooms or teaching stations, in
calculating facility capacity.
The District has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational
structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through
8 in middle schools and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school-year calendar
adopted by the District is also traditional, beginning in early September and ending in mid -
June, as is the daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and
ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., dependent on grade level.
The District and the Renton Education Association recognize that reasonable class size is
necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following student/teacher ratios:
Primary (K-3) 24:1
Intermediate (4-5) 29:1
Secondary (6-12) 29:1
The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science,
Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios
apply as follows:
Band/Orchestra 40:1
Choir 50:1
Middle School PE 35:1
High School PE 40:1
All other classes 31:1
Student /teacher ratios for special education classes held in self-contained classrooms are
not addressed in this Plan. Similarly, educational facilities dedicated solely to special
education programs or alternative learning experiences are excluded from these capacity
calculations, as are associated student headcounts.
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 6 -
Above student/teacher ratios are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms.
However, inasmuch as relocatable facilities do not generally allow for the full range of
educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or
interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development
driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be
financed and constructed. They are not viewed as a long-term solution to rising enrollment
or deficit facility capacity. For those reasons, capacities of relocatable classrooms are
calculated, but not used to determine future facility needs.
PRACTICAL CAPACITY MODEL
The Practical Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that
existing facilities place on enrollment due to existing educational programs, operating
policy and contractual restrictions.
The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each room in each facility. For every
room housing students, a calculation is made assigning a maximum number of students per
room. Sometimes core facilities, such as size of cafeteria or size of gym, number of
restrooms or size and number of specialty areas such as shops, limit enrollment to levels
below that expected by room occupancy levels.
Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by scheduling limitations and
student course selection. If rooms are utilized by staff for their planning period in a six
period day, capacity is limited to 83% (5/6) of the theoretical capacity. Since secondary
schools offer a number of elective courses, many courses will not attract a full classroom of
students.
Another factor that has influenced facility capacity at the elementary school level is the
change from half-day to full-day kindergarten. Beginning with the current school year, all
kindergarten classes throughout the District are full-day. This change alone created the
need for 7 additional kindergarten classrooms in 2014-15, effectively decreasing overall
permanent elementary school facility capacity by 168. Beyond full-day kindergarten,
reduced student/teacher ratios as prescribed by the McCleary Act would significantly
reduce building capacity if fully implemented.
A complete inventory of District facilities, including capacities, is provided in Section III.
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 7 -
III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILITIES
Renton School District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable
(portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12
(traditional elementary, middle and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use
or Non-instructional Support Facilities. The District maintains a total of 30 permanent and
49 relocatable facilities serving a total student population of 15,057.
The District’s K-12 facilities include 14 elementary schools, 3 middle schools, 3 high
schools and a Secondary Learning Center. Four Special Instructional Use facilities house
the District’s early childhood, special education and alternative educational programs.
Support facilities include Kohlwes Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center,
Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton
Memorial Stadium and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities
encompass 2,421,229 square feet, with 2,243,813 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and
instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps.
Relocatable facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house
students on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those
reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not
acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the 49 relocatable
facilities in the District’s inventory, 30 are “double portables” containing two classrooms,
providing the district with a total of 79 relocatable classrooms encompassing 70,784 square
feet of additional instructional space.
Table 1 below summarizes existing K-12 facility capacity. A complete inventory of
District facilities, including undeveloped property, follows. Facility capacity worksheets
may be found in Appendix B.
Type Elementary
Schools
Middle
Schools
High
Schools Total
Permanent 6,816 3,120 5,156 15,092
Relocatable 1,104 598 144 1,846
Total 7,920 3,718 5,300 16,938
EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY
Table 1
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 8 -
INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES
NAME LOCATION AREA (sq. ft.)CAPACITY
Benson Hill 18665 - 116TH Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 67,533 520
Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, WA 98178 49,157 424
Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 57,072 400
Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 59,164 494
Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, WA 98056 66161 542
Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, WA 98056 60,000 542
Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059 54,620 398
Kennydale 1700 NE 28th st., Renton, WA 98056 65,169 568
Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, WA 98178 52,958 426
Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, WA 98059 56,220 516
Renton Park 16828 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 65,955 546
Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98058 53,992 540
Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Road, Renton, WA 98055 57,844 474
Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, WA 98058 58,758 426
Total Grades K-5 Capacity 824,603 6,816
Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle 98178 109,070 1,066
McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, WA 98056 126,706 1,066
Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 124,234 988
Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 360,010 3,120
Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059 327,395 1,632
Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 242,662 1,296
Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, WA 98057 278,373 1,752
Secondary Learning Center 7800 S 132nd St, Renton, WA 98178 70,831 476
Total Grades 9-12 Capacity 919,261 5,156
Total Grade Levels K-12 2,103,874 15,092
Meadow Crest ECC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98056 68,752 464
Sartori Education Center 315 Garden Ave. N, Renton, WA 98057 39,345 310
HOME Program - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 7,005 147
Renton Academy - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 24,837 50
Total Instructional Special Use 139,939 971
Total Instructional Facilities 2,243,813 16,063
Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 21,894
Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, WA 98055 57,000
Lindbergh Pool 16740 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 13,600
Nutrition Services/Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton, WA 98057 27,466
Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055 37,213
Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, WA 98057 20,243
Total Support Services 177,416
Total All Permanent Facilities 2,421,229
MI
D
D
L
E
SC
H
O
O
L
S
EL
E
M
E
N
T
A
T
Y
S
C
H
O
O
L
S
HI
G
H
S
C
H
O
O
L
S
IN
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SP
E
C
I
A
L
U
S
E
SU
P
P
O
R
T
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 9 -
BLDG. ID LOCATION
NUMBER OF
CLASSROOMS
AREA
(sq.ft.)
STUDENT
CAPACITY
16 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24
19 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24
20 Lindbergh High 1 896 24
34 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24
53 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 52
54 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 52
55 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 52
56 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 52
57 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 52
58 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24
59 Lindbergh High 1 896 24
60 Lindbergh High 1 896 24
61 Lindbergh High 1 896 24
62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24
63 Cascade Elementary 1 896 24
64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24
65 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26
66 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26
68 Sierra Heights Elementary 1 896 24
69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1,792 48
70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24
71 Sierra Heights Elementary 1 896 24
72 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 52
73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 1,792 48
74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48
77 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 52
78 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 52
79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1,792 52
80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1,792 48
81 Cascade Elementary 2 1,792 48
82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48
83 Lindbergh High 2 1,792 48
84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48
85 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26
86 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26
87 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26
88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1,792 48
89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1,792 48
90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1,792 48
91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1,792 48
92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1,792 48
93 Spring Glen/H.O.M.E. Program 2 1,792 48
94 Spring Glen/H.O.M.E. Program 2 1,792 48
95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1,792 48
96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1,792 48
97 Cascade Elementary 2 1,792 48
98 Cascade Elementary 2 1,792 48
99 Lakeridge Elementary 2 1,792 48
100 Lakeridge Elementary 2 1,792 48
Totals 79 70,784 1,942
INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 10 -
LOCATION ADDRESS
RELOCATABLE
FACILITY ID
AREA
(sq. ft.)CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle 98178 88, 89 3,584 96
Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 95, 96 3,584 96
Cascade 16022 116th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 63, 81, 97, 98 6,272 168
Honeydew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059 69, 80, 90, 91 7,168 192
Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle 98178 73, 99, 100 5,376 144
Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave. SE, Renton 98059 16, 19, 34, 58, 84 5,376 144
Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059 68, 71, 74, 82 5,376 144
Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd. S, Renton 98055 62, 64, 70 2,688 72
Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 92 1,792 48
Elementary School Total 41,216 1,104
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
Dimmitt 12320 80th Ave. S, Seattle 98078 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, 87 6,272 182
McKnight 1200 Edmonds Ave. NE, Renton 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 208
Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 208
Middle School Total 20,608 598
HIGH SCHOOLS
Lindbergh 16426 128th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 20, 59, 60, 61, 83 5,376 144
High School Total 5,376 144
SPECIAL EDUCATION
Spring Glen 2706 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 93, 94 3,584 96
Special Education Total 3,584 96
TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS 70,784 1,942
RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SITE
UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
Skyway Site 4.18 acres NW corner S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 11 -
IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
Renton School District six-year enrollment projections through the 2019-20 school year are
based on data published by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI).
OSPI utilizes the cohort survival method to forecast student enrollment projections for a
six-year period based on actual student headcounts documented for the previous six years.
Enrollment reports prepared by the District are submitted to OSPI on an annual basis. The
District’s October 1, 2013 Enrollment Report and OSPI Report No. 1049 are included in
Appendix C.
Renton School District six-year enrollment projections, found on the following page,
reflect adjustments to OSPI’s report based on the following:
1. Report structure has been modified to reflect middle school versus junior high
school grade level configuration.
2. Headcount includes only K-12 students attending comprehensive instructional
facilities and excludes students attending special education facilities or facilities
accommodating alternative learning experiences.
Current projections indicate significant increased enrollment over the next six years,
especially at the elementary and middle school grade levels, with only minor growth at the
high school grade levels (Table 2).
By the school year 2020-2021, the District expects an overall student enrollment increase
of 14.7%, with a 20.0% increase at the elementary school level, a 17.9% increase at the
middle school level and a 2.8 % increase at the high school level.
`
2014
Headcount
2020-21
Projection
Student
Increase
%
Increase
Elementary 7,469 8,963 1,494 20.0
Middle 3,210 3,783 573 17.9
High 4,239 4,358 119 2.8
Total 14,918 17,104 2,186 14.7
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH
Table 2
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 12 -
- - HEADCOUNT - -AVE. %
2014 SURVIVAL 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Kindergarten 1,327 1,385 1,424 1,463 1,502 1,541 1,581
Grade 1 1,335 101.96 1,353 1,412 1,452 1,492 1,531 1,571
Grade 2 1,318 100.17 1,337 1,355 1,415 1,454 1,494 1,534
Grade 3 1,232 98.98 1,305 1,324 1,341 1,400 1,440 1,479
Grade 4 1,168 98.74 1,216 1,288 1,307 1,325 1,382 1,421
Grade 5 1,089 99.56 1,163 1,211 1,282 1,301 1,319 1,376
Total K - 5 7,469 7,759 8,014 8,260 8,474 8,707 8,963
Grade 6 1,064 96.71 1,053 1,125 1,171 1,240 1,258 1,275
Grade7 1,044 100.58 1,070 1,059 1,131 1,178 1,247 1,266
Grade 8 1,102 99.56 1,039 1,065 1,055 1,126 1,173 1,242
Total 6 - 8 3,210 3,163 3,249 3,357 3,544 3,679 3,783
Grade 9 1,110 112.87 1,244 1,173 1,203 1,190 1,271 1,324
Grade 10 1,114 89.65 995 1,115 1,052 1,078 1,067 1,140
Grade 11 973 90.06 1,003 896 1,004 947 971 961
Grade 12 1,042 96.12 935 964 861 965 910 933
Total 9 - 12 4,239 4,177 4,149 4,120 4,181 4,220 4,358
Total K -12 14,918 15,099 15,412 15,737 16,199 16,606 17,104
- - - - PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS - - - -
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS BY COHORT SURVIVAL*
(KK Linear Projection)
RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 403
* Information adapted from OSPI Report No. 1049, December 30, 2014. Headcount and projections do not
include enrollment at Special Use facilities.
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 13 -
V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS
Table 3 compares the current capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and
projected enrollment. For the school year 2020-2021, the table indicates a significant deficit
of 2,147 at the elementary level and a much less imposing deficit of 663 at the middle
school level. Only at the high school level is the current capacity adequate to handle
projected 2020 -2021 enrollment. It is clear that the need for additional elementary and
middle school facilities is driven by increased enrollment, past and projected.
Facility Type Enrollment Permanent
Capacity Surplus/(Deficit)2020-21
Enrollment
2020-21
Surplus/(Deficit)
Elementary 7,469 6,816 (653)8,963 (2,147)
Middle School 3,210 3,120 (90)3,783 (663)
High School 4,239 5,156 917 4,358 798
Total 14,918 15,092 174 17,104 (2,012)
planning, design or construction phase.
CURRENT AND PROJECTED CAPACITY NEEDS
CURRENT PROJECTED1
Table 3
1. Projected surplus/deficit based on current permanent facilities and does not include facilities in the
The 2012 Bond Measure, approved by District voters in April 2012, included several
provisions specifically targeting these deficits, including a new middle school and the
acquisition of land for future development. A summary of the 2012 Bond Measure can be
found in Appendix D.
Middle School No. 4, currently under construction and scheduled to open in Fall 2016, will
provide the necessary capacity to handle projected enrollment up to and beyond the six-year
period addressed by this Plan. The new middle school is located near the northern District
boundary, in the City of Newcastle, on the site of the recently demolished Renton
Academy/Old Hazelwood Elementary, and adjacent to the new Hazelwood Elementary.
At the elementary school level, the 2012 Bond Measure provided for the acquisition of
property for future development, but did not include necessary funding for construction of
new elementary facilities. Passage of another bond measure is essential to mitigating the
current and projected elementary school deficit, and the District is currently planning on
putting a new bond measure before the voters in February 2016. Until such time that funds
are available, deficits at the elementary school level will have to be addressed temporarily
by the use of relocatable classrooms; either new or relocated from other facilities. These
costs must also be included in the Six-Year Finance Plan.
The Construction Plan/Capacity Matrix on the following page illustrates current capacities
and proposed increased capacities in response to projected enrollment increases. Projected
capacity surpluses and deficits are tracked for each year of the six -year period covered by
this Plan, and are calculated both with and without the inclusion of relocatable classrooms.
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 14 -
CONTRUCTION PLAN/CAPACITY MATRIX
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: GRADES K-5
ACTUAL PROJECTED
PLAN YEAR 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Permanent Capacity 6816 6816 6816 6816 6816 6816 7366
New Construction 550 550
Total Permanent Capacity 6816 6816 6816 6816 6816 7366 7916
Relocatable Capacity 1104 1104 1344 1464 1584 1680 1680
New/Relocated Capacity 240 120 120 96
Total Relocatable Capacity 1104 1344 1464 1584 1680 1680 1680
Enrollment 7469 7759 8014 8260 8474 8707 8963
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent only (653)(943)(1198)(1444)(1658)(1341)(1047)
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent & Relocatable 451 401 266 140 22 339 633
MIDDLE SCHOOL: GRADES 6-8
ACTUAL PROJECTED
PLAN YEAR 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Permanent Capacity 3120 3120 3120 3970 3970 3970 3970
New Construction 850
Total Permanent Capacity 3120 3120 3970 3970 3970 3970 3970
Relocatable Capacity 598 598 598 338 78 78 78
New/Relocated Capacity (260)(260)
Total Relocatable Capacity 598 598 338 78 78 78 78
Enrollment 3210 3163 3249 3357 3544 3679 3783
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent only (90)(43)721 613 426 291 187
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent & Relocatable 508 555 1059 691 504 369 265
HIGH SCHOOL: GRADES 9-12
ACTUAL PROJECTED
PLAN YEAR 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Permanent Capacity 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710
New Construction
Total Permanent Capacity 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710
Relocatable Capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
New/Relocated Capacity
Total Relocatable Capacity 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Enrollment 4239 4177 4149 4120 4181 4220 4358
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent only 471 533 561 590 529 490 352
Surplus/(Deficit)
Permanent & Relocatable 621 683 711 740 679 640 502
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 15 -
VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN
Capital facilities capacity improvements referenced in this Plan will be funded by 2012
bond monies, remaining 2008 bond funds, impact fees and a possible special levy or future
bond initiative. The District may also be eligible for OSPI school construction assistance.
Recently completed Meadow Crest Early Childhood Learning Center represents the final
major project to be completed under the 2008 bond initiative. The major capacity-driven
project to be funded by the 2012 bond is the new middle school (Middle School No. 4)
currently in the final planning stage and scheduled to open Fall of 2016. Other capacity
related projects to be funded by the 2012 Bond Measure include land acquisition and
replacement/relocation/upgrade of portable classrooms. Funding for a new elementary
school is as yet unsecured.
The District intends to structure its capital improvement program so as to maintain a
constant level of construction throughout the program period, in order to optimally utilize
its management capabilities.
Estimated expenditures for capacity improvement projects over the duration of the Plan are
indicated in the Table 4 below.
SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN
Capacity Improvement Projects
PROJECT 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Total Secured2 Unsecured3
Middle School No. 4 15,400 23,200 2,900 41,500 41,500
Relocatable Classrooms 1,200 1,000 800 400 3,400 1,750 1,650
Land Acquisition 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,250 2,250 12,000 5,000 7,000
New Elementary Schools 7,200 5,900 18,900 32,800 22,500 87,300 87,300
Total 19,100 33,900 12,100 21,550 35,050 22,500 144,200 48,250 95,950
1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost including hard and soft costs.
3. Unsecured funds include OSPI School Construction Assistance, future school impact fees and future bond initiatives.
Funding ($1,000s)Estimated Expenditures1 ($1,000s)
2. Secured funding includes 2012 bond monies, previously collected school impact fees, and proceeds from sale of
surplus properties.
Table 4
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 16 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 17 -
VII. IMPACT FEES
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact that new housing developments have on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County code 21A and was substantially
adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The formula requires the District
to establish a “Student Generation Factor” that estimates how many students will be added
to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit constructed, and to establish
several standard construction costs which are unique to that district. Refer to Appendix G
for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors.
Site Acquisition Cost is the estimated cost per acre to purchase property.
Building Acquisition Cost is the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district.
New Facility Cost Models are provided in Appendix G.
Temporary Facility Cost is the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a
relocatable classroom.
State Funding Assistance Credit is the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to
District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance
percentage established by the State.
In response to declining economic conditions over the past several years, and the slow
recovery, Renton School District has inserted a Voluntary District Adjustment component
into the prescribed impact fee formula. The intent of this adjustment is to limit any
increase in impact fees to a percentage equal to the local rate of inflation (CPU-U-Sea) as
reported by the King County Office of Economic and Financial Analysis. While both
single and multi-family impact fees show an increase over last year’s fees, the final fees
reflect a reduction of $3,503 and $1,704 respectively, as a result of the limiting 1.84% rate
of inflation for the year 2013.
Based on the Growth Management Act and King County Code 21A, impact fees for the
plan year 2015 are:
Single-Family Units $ 5,643
Multi-Family Units $ 1,385
Single-Family and Multi-Family Fee Calculation spreadsheets follow.
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 18 -
((1 + i)t - 1
i (1 + i)t
SITE ACQUISITION COST
FACILITY SITE AREA COST PER ACRE STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
A1 Elementary 10 450,000 550 0.361 $2,954
A2 Middle 20 450,000 850 0.133 $1,408
A3 N / A 40 450,000 1250 0.139 $0
A Total 0.633 $4,362
BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST IN 2015 $ STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
B1 Elementary 95.24%26,148,500 550 0.361 $16,346
B2 Middle 94.59%38,234,860 850 0.133 $5,659
B3 N / A 99.42%0 1250 0.139 $0
B Total 96.75%0.633 $22,005
TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST PER CLASS STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
C1 Elementary 4.76%165,000 24 0.361 $118
C2 Middle 5.41%165,000 26 0.133 $46
C3 N / A 0.58%165,000 26 0.139 $0
C Total 3.25%0.633 $164
STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT
COST INDEX SPI SQ FT MATCH %STUDENT FACTOR CREDIT
D1 200.4 90 0.399 0.361 ($2,598)
D2 200.4 117 0.399 0.133 ($1,244)
D3 200.4 130 0.399 0.139 $0
D Total 0.633 ($3,842)
TAX CREDIT (TC) *
AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAV)311,174
INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i)3.68%
TERM (t = MAXIMUM 10)10
TAX RATE (r)0.00171412
TC Total ($4,396.02)($4,396)
FACILITY CREDIT $0
TOTAL FEE $18,292
50% DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $9,146
IMPACT FEE $9,146
PREVIOUS YEAR'S IMPACT FEE $5,541
VOLUNTARY MAX. IMPACT FEE INCREASE (previous year's fee X 0.0184)$102
VOLUNTARY IMPACT FEE ADJUSTMENT $3,503
ADJUSTED IMPACT FEE $5,643
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION
* TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV =
AAV = Average Assessed Value
r = Tax Rate
i = Bond Interest Rate as of 12/27/12
t = Bond Term
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 19 -
((1 + i)t - 1
i (1 + i)t
SITE ACQUISITION COST
FACILITY SITE AREA COST PER ACRE STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
A1 Elementary 10 450,000 550 0.170 $1,391
A2 Middle 20 450,000 850 0.050 $529
A3 High N/A 40 450,000 1250 0.061 $0
A Total 0.281 $1,920
BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST IN 2014 $ STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
B1 Elementary 95.24%18,293,275 550 0.170 $5,385
B2 Middle 94.59%35,047,880 850 0.050 $1,950
B3 High N/A 99.42%0 1250 0.061 $0
B Total 96.75%0.281 $7,335
TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST
COST PER CLASS STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST
C1 Elementary 4.76%165,000 24 0.170 $56
C2 Middle 5.41%165,000 26 0.050 $17
C3 High N/A 0.58%165,000 26 0.061 $0
C Total 3.25%0.281 $73
STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT
COST INDEX SPI SQ FT MATCH %STUDENT FACTOR CREDIT
D1 200.4 90 0.399 0.170 ($1,223)
D2 200.4 117 0.399 0.050 ($468)
D3 200.4 130 0.399 0.061 $0
D Total 0.281 ($1,691)
TAX CREDIT (TC) *
AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAS)103,325
INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i)3.68%
TERM (MAXIMUM 10)10
TAX RATE (r)0.00171412
TC Total ($1,459.69)($1,460)
FACILITY CREDIT $0
FEE $6,178
50% DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $3,089
IMPACT FEE $3,089
PREVIOUS YEAR'S IMPACT FEE $1,360
VOLUNTARY MAX. IMPACT FEE INCREASE (previous year's fee X 0.0184)$25
VOLUNTARY IMPACT FEE ADJUSTMENT $1,704
ADJUSTED IMPACT FEE $1,385
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION
* TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV =
AAV = Average Assessed Value
r = Tax Rate
i = Bond Interest Rate as of 12/27/12
t = Bond Term
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 20 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 21 -
XIII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: DISTRICT MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
APPENDIX B: CAPACITY WORKSHEETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
APPENDIX C: HEADCOUNT & PROJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
APPENDIX D: 2012 BOND MEASURE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31
APPENDIX E: 2016 BOND MEASURE PROPOSAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
APPENDIX G: SCHOOL COST MODELS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
APPENDIX H: CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
- 22 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX A
- 23 -
RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY
RENTON
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX A
- 24 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX A
- 25 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX A
- 26 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX B
- 27 -
ASSUMPTIONS Average class size:Class size:K 24
Kindergarten 24.00 1 24
Grades 1 - 5 26.00 2 24
FTE variation from 10 / 1:0.98 3 24
Scheduling efficiency:0.92 4 29
5 29
FTE FTE
CLASSROOMS GENERAL KINDER SPEC ED SPEC USE CAPACITY PORT USE ADD SPEC CAPACITY
W/ PORTS
SCHOOL
BENSON HILL 18 4 3 3 520 0 0 520
BRYN MAWR 14 4 1 3 424 4 0 520
CAMPBELL HILL 13 4 3 3 400 4 0 496
CASCADE 16 5 3 3 494 7 0 662
HAZELWOOD 18 5 3 3 542 0 0 542
HIGHLANDS 18 5 3 3 542 0 0 542
HONEY DEW 12 5 2 1 398 8 0 590
KENNYDALE 20 4 1 3 568 0 0 568
LAKERIDGE 15 3 3 3 426 6 0 570
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS 16 6 1 2 516 6 0 660
RENTON PARK 20 3 3 3 546 0 0 546
SIERRA HEIGHTS 17 6 1 2 540 6 0 684
TALBOT HILL 17 3 1 3 474 3 0 546
TIFFANY PARK 15 3 3 3 426 2 0 474
TOTAL 229 60 31 38 6816 46 0 7,920
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY
ASSUMPTIONS Average class size 29 Class size 6 29
FTE variation from 10 / 1 0.98 7 29
Scheduling efficiency 0.92 8 29
#FTE
TEACHING SPEC SPEC FTE PORT SPEC CAPACITY
CLASSROOMS STATIONS GENERAL SCI PE DRAMACOMP CTE ART MUSIC ED USE CAPACITY USE USE W/ PORTS
SCHOOL
DIMMITT 43 26 2 4 1 1 4 1 2 2 0 1066 7 1248
McKNIGHT 47 20 8 4 1 2 2 1 3 6 0 1066 8 1274
NELSEN 47 18 8 3 1 3 2 1 2 9 0 988 8 1196
TOTAL 137 17 0 3120 23 3718
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 – 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX B
- 28 -
ASSUMPTIONS Average class size 29 Class size 9 29
FTE variation from 10/1 0.98 10 29
Scheduling efficiency 0.85 11 29
12 29
#FTE
TEACHING SPEC SPEC FTE PORT SPEC CAPACITY
CLASSROOMS STATIONS GENERAL SCI GYM HE COMPSHOP ART MUSIC ED USE CAPACITY USE USE W/ PORTS
SCHOOL
HAZEN 77 48 6 5 3 6 4 3 2 9 0 1632 0 0 1632
LINDBERGH 59 34 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 0 1296 1 0 1320
RENTON 78 44 6 5 6 7 5 3 2 5 0 1752 0 0 1752
SLC 27 20 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 476 0 0 476
TOTAL 214 19 5 5156 1 5180
HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY
ASSUMPTIONS Average class size Varies All facilities used for special programs
FTE variation from 10/1 0.98
Scheduling efficiency 0.94
FTE FTE
CLASSROOMS GENERAL SPEC ED SPEC USE CAPACITY PORT USE ADD SPEC CAPACITY
W/ PORTS
SCHOOL
RENTON ACADEMY 24 0 3 243 0 0 243
MEADOW CREST 21 0 0 464 0 0 464
SARTORI 14 0 3 310 0 0 310
SPRING GLEN 14 0 1 310 4 0 398
TOTAL 73 0 7 1327 4 0 1415
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL FACILITY CAPACITY
Capital Facilities Plan 2015- 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX C
- 29 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015– 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX C
- 30 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015- 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX D
- 31 -
2012 BOND MEASURE SUMMARY
NEW FACILITIES
New Middle School
119,000 sf
Located at Renton Academy site
EXISTING FACILITIES UPGRADES
Lindbergh Pool Upgrades
SITE RELATED UPGRADES
Parking Lot and Sidewalk Upgrades
Elementary Field Upgrades
SAFETY AND SECURITY
Add Emergency Generators
Fire Alarm and Smoke Detector Upgrades
Security System Upgrades
ENERGY CONSERVATION
Boiler Upgrades
Parking Lot Lighting and Controls
Heating Systems Upgrades
BUILDING UPGRADES
Exterior Upgrades
Roofing Replacements
Replace Gutters and Downspouts
Interior Upgrades
Upgrade/Replace Interior Finishes and Materials
Electrical – Replace/Upgrade System Components
Plumbing – Replace/Upgrade System Components
Mechanical – Replace/Upgrade System Components
Portables
Replace Aging Portables
LAND ACQUISITION
For Future Planning
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX D
- 32 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
- 33 -
Proposal For
Capital Facilities Plan 2014– 2020 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
- 34 -
Proposal for 2016 Bond Measure
Capital Facilities Plan 2014– 2020 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
- 35 -
Proposal for 2016 Bond Measure
Capital Facilities Plan 2014– 2020 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX E
- 36 -
Proposal for 2016 Bond Measure
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX F
- 37 -
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council
Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, requires that school districts provide “student factors
based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments
constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee
calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not
available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics,
or county-wide averages must be used.”
King County currently assesses and collects impact fees on behalf of twelve school
districts, including Renton School District. Of those twelve districts, only five conduct
their own surveys to develop their unique student generation factors based on district
records and actual development data. The remaining seven districts, including Renton, rely
on averages of student factors developed by other districts.
In accordance with King County Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, the District has chosen
to use a county-wide average based on all districts that have performed their own student
generation factor surveys as well as those that have similarly relied on county-wide data.
The Student Generation Factors in Table 5 below represent an average of the student rates
calculated by the other eleven school districts.
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
ELEMENTARY
(K-5)
MIDDLE SCHOOL
(6-8)
HIGH SCHOOL
(9-12)TOTAL
SINGLE-FAMILY 0.361 0.133 0.139 0.633
MULTI-FAMILY 0.170 0.050 0.061 0.281
Table 5
Table 6 on the following page details the student generation factors developed by the
Districts referenced above, and the averages used in this Plan’s impact fee calculations.
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX F
- 38 -
DISTRICT K-5 6-8 9-12 TOTAL K-5 6-8 9-12 TOTAL
Auburn 0.165 0.076 0.089 0.330 0.223 0.091 0.092 0.406
Enumclaw 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317
Federal Way 0.332 0.166 0.210 0.707 0.148 0.042 0.059 0.249
Fife 0.235 0.157 0.000 0.392 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Highline 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317
Issaquah 0.471 0.170 0.145 0.786 0.165 0.052 0.051 0.268
Kent 0.484 0.129 0.249 0.862 0.324 0.066 0.118 0.508
Lake Washington 0.393 0.131 0.103 0.627 0.055 0.017 0.012 0.084
Tahoma 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317
Riverview 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317
Snoqualmie Valley 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317
TOTAL 3.970 1.464 1.526 6.959 1.875 0.553 0.672 3.100
AVERAGE 0.361 0.133 0.139 0.633 0.170 0.050 0.061 0.282
SINGLE-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY
COUNTY-WIDE STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Table 6
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX G
- 39 -
FACILITY COST MODELS
Facility cost models are a calculation of the cost to construct educational facilities unique
to the District. This is accomplished by utilizing both District specific data as well as
information available from OSPI.
OSPI constants are factors established by OSPI as part of its School Construction
Assistance Program. State Funding Assistance Percentages are unique to individual school
districts while the Construction Cost Allocation (per square foot of construction) is
constant throughout the state. The State Area Allocation (per student) is used solely by
OSPI to determine a District’s eligibility for state funding. It is not meant to represent or
reflect the unique spatial needs of a District necessary to provide its adopted programs and
standard of service.
The District Area Allocation utilized in the cost models reflects historical data from
previously constructed facilities, or facilities currently under construction, adjusted to
reflect current programs, anticipated funding and other topical issues. The applied Cost per
Square Foot is an average of recently bid school projects of similar grade levels in the
Puget Sound Region, as reported by OSPI.
Elementary and Middle School Cost Models follow.
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX G
- 40 -
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COST MODEL
FACILITY INFORMATION
Building Site Work
Student capacity 550 Area (acres)7
SF per student 126 Cost per acre $425,000
Generic classrooms 27 Right-of-way LF 2,200
Gym and cafeteria Separate Right-of-way cost per LF $350
Building area (SF)69,500 Utility improvements $350,000
Cost per SF $308
Demolition Site Preparation
Area (SF)43,750 Area (acres)7
Cost per SF $10 Cost per acre $30,000
CONSTRUCTION COST
Demolition $437,500
Site prep $210,000
Building $21,406,000
Site work $2,975,000
Right-of-way improvements $770,000
Off-site utility improvements $350,000
Subtotal $26,148,500
Cost per SF $376
SOFT COSTS
Professional fees 12%$3,137,820
Sales tax 10%$2,614,850
Change Order Contingency 7%$1,830,395
Permits 1%$261,485
Special inspections 1%$261,485
Art 1%$261,485
Work by separate contract 1%$261,485
Temporary Facilities 1%$261,485
Moving and Storage 1%$261,485
Furniture, fixtures & equipment 6%$1,568,910
Project management 3%$784,455
District administration 1%$261,485
Mitigation 3%$784,455
Project contingency 7%$1,830,395
Subtotal $14,381,675
CONSTRUCTION COSTS + SOFT COSTS $40,530,175
ESCALATION Year Inflation Rate Amount
2015 0.93%$40,907,106
Bond 2016 2.32%$41,856,150
Bid 2017 2.62%$42,952,782
PROJECT COSTS Midpoint 2018 2.73%$44,125,393
2019 2.66%$45,299,128
2020 2.90%$46,612,803
Note: Amounts do not include property acquisition
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX G
- 41 -
MIDDLE SCHOOL COST MODEL
FACILITY INFORMATION
Building Site Work
Student capacity 850 Area (acres)11
SF per student 140 Cost per acre $400,000
Generic classrooms 31 Right-of-way LF 1,000
Building area (SF)119,000 Right-of-way cost per LF $350
Cost per SF $270 Utility improvements $231,000
Demolition/Abatement Site Preparation
Area (SF)52,924 Area (acres)11
Cost per SF $15 Cost per acre $30,000
CONSTRUCTION COST
Demolition $793,860
Site prep $330,000
Building $32,130,000
Site work $4,400,000
Right-of-way improvements $350,000
Off-site utility improvements $231,000
Subtotal $38,234,860
Cost per SF $321
SOFT COSTS
Professional fees 12%$4,588,183
Sales tax 10%$3,632,312
Change Order Contingency 7%$1,830,395
Permits 1%$261,485
Special inspections 1%$130,743
Art 1%$130,743
Work by separate contract 1%$261,485
Temporary Facilities 1%$130,743
Moving and Storage 1%$130,743
Furniture, fixtures & equipment 6%$1,568,910
Project management 2%$522,970
District administration 1%$130,743
Mitigation 2%$522,970
Project contingency 7%$2,676,440
Subtotal $16,518,863
CONSTRUCTION COSTS + SOFT COSTS (BID 02/26/2015)$54,753,723
ESCALATION Year Inflation Rate Amount
2015 0.93%
2016 2.32%
2017 2.62%
2018 2.73%
2019 2.66%
2020 2.90%
Note: Amounts do not include property acquisition
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX G
- 42 -
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX H
- 43 -
CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN
PERMANENT FACILITY CAPACITY
2014-2020 2015-2021 CHANGE
Elementary 7,251 6816 -435
Middle 3,138 3120 -18
High 4,710 5156 446
Total 15,099 15,092 -7
ACTUAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October headcount)
2014 2015 CHANGE
Elementary 7,226 7469 243
Middle 3,169 3210 41
High 3,932 4239 307
Total 14,327 14918 591
IMPACT FEES
2014-2020 2015-2021 CHANGE
SINGLE-FAMILY FEE 5,541 5,643 102
Student Generation Factors
Elementary 0.380 0.361 -0.019
Middle 0.144 0.133 0.011
High 0.149 0.139 -0.010
Total 0.673 0.633 -0.040
MULTI-FAMILY FEE 1,360 1,385 25
Student Generation Factors
Elementary 0.139 0.170 0.031
Middle 0.039 0.050 0.011
High 0.055 0.061 0.006
Total 0.233 0.281 0.048
IMPACT FEE FACTORS
Cost per Acre 450,000 400,000 -50,000
Temp. Bldg. Acquisition 165,000 165,000 0
State Match Percentage 0.3930 0.3990 0.0060
Ave. Assessed Value - Single 219,000 311,174 92,174
Ave. Assessed Value - Multi 93,092 103,325 10,233
Bond Interest Rate 4.46% 3.68% -0.78%
Tax Rate 2.30546/1000 1.71412/1000 -0.59134/1000
Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403
APPENDIX G
*