HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 09/20/2010AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
September 20, 2010
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.PROCLAMATION
a. Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry ‐ September 25, 2010
4.SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
a. 4th of July Wrap‐Up
b. IKEA Renton River Days Wrap‐Up
5.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The
comment period will be limited to one‐half hour. The second audience comment period later on in
the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please
walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST
NAME.
7.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Mayor Law appoints Amy Pieper to the Library Advisory Board, for an unexpired term expiring
9/1/2014 (position previously held by Jason Oleston). Refer to Community Services Committee.
b. Mayor Law appoints Richard Siers to the Airport Advisory Committee, Highlands Neighborhood
primary position, for an unexpired term expiring 5/7/2013 (position previously held by Michael
O'Halloran). Refer to Community Services Committee.
c. City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087, Stonegate Lift Station
Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate $1,404,019.95; and submits staff recommendation
to award the contract to the low bidder, Shoreline Construction, Co., in the amount of
$1,213,270. Refer to Utilities Committee for discussion of funding.
d. City Clerk submits request for partial release of Easement for Slopes by Hal Grubb, Barghausen
Engineers, 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, 98032 for approximately 3,729 square feet of property
located on the north side of SE Carr Rd., at 10436 SE Carr Rd., in the vicinity west of 108th Ave.
SE (SR 515) and east of Talbot Rd. S. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
Page 1 of 146
e. Community and Economic Development Department recommends amending City Code to
adopt legislative changes regarding appeal provisions. Refer to Planning and Development
Committee.
f. Community Services Department recommends approval of the revised 2010 and the 2011/2012
Community Development Block Grant Human Services funding allocations and Contingency
Funding Plan. Refer to Finance Committee.
g. Community Services Department recommends approval of the 2011/2012 General Fund Human
Services funding allocation recommendations and Contingency Funding Plan. Refer to Finance
Committee.
h. Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the termination of CAG‐08‐194, with
King County Transit, and approval of an addendum in the amount of $199,743.57 per year
(beginning in 2013), to provide enhanced service and routing on Metro Route 110. Council
concur. (See 9.a. for resolution.)
i. Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer
Extension Special Assessment District in the estimated amount of $347,455.53. Refer to
Utilities Committee.
j. Utility Systems Division submits proposed changes to the water, wastewater, and surface
water utility rates. Refer to Committee of the Whole.
k. Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and operation of all stormwater
facilities in single‐family residential plats with public streets. Refer to Committee of the
Whole.
l. Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in non‐matching grant funds
from the Department of Ecology to implement requirements associated with the National
Pollutant & Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Municipal Stormwater permit.
Council concur.
8.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held
by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Public Safety Committee: Feeding Dangerous Wildlife
9.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolution:
a. Route 110 service partnership agreement with King County Transit (See 7.h.)
10.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.)
11.AUDIENCE COMMENT
12.ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 146
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
7TH FLOOR CONFERENCING CENTER
September 20, 2010
Monday, 6:00 p.m.
Regional Issues (Rail, I‐405 Tolling, November Ballot Issues)
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:
Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM
Page 3 of 146
3a. ‐ Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry ‐ September 25, 2010
Page 4 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Appointment to the Library Advisory Board
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Application for Boards/Commissions/Committees
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Denis Law, Mayor
Recommended Action:
Refer to Community Services Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Mayor Law appoints the following to the Library Advisory Board:
Ms. Amy Pieper, 264 Earlington Avenue NW, Renton, WA 98057, for a term expiring September 1, 2014
(position previously held by Jason Oleston).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm Mayor Law's appointment of Ms. Pieper to the Library Advisory Board
7a. ‐ Mayor Law appoints Amy Pieper to the Library Advisory Board, for
an unexpired term expiring 9/1/2014 (position previously held by Jason Page 5 of 146
7a. ‐ Mayor Law appoints Amy Pieper to the Library Advisory Board, for
an unexpired term expiring 9/1/2014 (position previously held by Jason Page 6 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Appointment to Airport Advisory Board: Richard
Siers
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Application for Boards, Commissions, Committees
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Denis Law, Mayor
Recommended Action:
Refer to Community Services Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Mayor Law appoints the following to the Airport Advisory Committee:
Richard Siers, 4706 NE 1st Court, Renton, WA 98059 (Highlands Neighborhood primary position), for a
term expiring May 7, 2013 (position previously held by Michael O'Halloran).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm Mayor Law's appointment of Mr. Siers to the Airport Advisory Committee.
7b. ‐ Mayor Law appoints Richard Siers to the Airport Advisory
Committee, Highlands Neighborhood primary position, for an unexpired Page 7 of 146
7b. ‐ Mayor Law appoints Richard Siers to the Airport Advisory
Committee, Highlands Neighborhood primary position, for an unexpired Page 8 of 146
7b. ‐ Mayor Law appoints Richard Siers to the Airport Advisory
Committee, Highlands Neighborhood primary position, for an unexpired Page 9 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Bid opening on August 24, 2010 for CAG-10-087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Staff Recommendation
Bid Tab (14 bids)
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk, x6502
Recommended Action:
Refer to Utilities Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $1,213,270 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ $2,700,000 (2010 & 2011)City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $1,404,019.95
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following
criteria: There was more than one bid, the were no significant irregularities with the low bid, and the
bid is within the budgeted amount for the project for 2010 and proposed 2011. Due to prior phase work
for this project, award of this contract requires approval of the 2011 proposed budget amount of $1.4
million.
Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Shoreline Construction Co. in the
amount of $1,213,270 and refer the issue to the Utilities Committee for discussion of funding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid submitted by Shoreline Construction Co. in the amount of $1,213,270 and approve
the proposed $1.4 million funding for 2011.
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 10 of 146
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
September 2, 2010
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk SEP 0 2 2010
') A„. RECEIVED
John Hobson, Wastewater Utility Engineer, x7279 tA/T CLERK'S OFFICE
Bid Award for Stonegate Lift Station Replacement Project
The Public Works Department has reviewed the bids submitted for the Stonegate Lift
Station Replacement project and recommends that the bid be awarded to Shoreline
Construction Co. We are requesting that an agenda bill for "Refer to Utilities
Committee" be prepared for the September 20, 2010, Council Meeting.
The bid opening was on Tuesday, August 24, 2010. There were 14 bids received. There
were math errors in three bids:
Contractor
Western Engineering
Contractors
Boss Construction, Inc.
McClure and Sons, Inc.
Original Bid
$1,450,458.90
$1,473,213.00
$1,582,023.00
Corrected Bid
$1,432,938.90
$1,520,007.83
$1,559,028.15
Original
Bid Placing
7th
9th
12th
Revised Bid
Placing
6th
llth
12th
The low bidder is Shoreline Construction Co. with a bid of $1,213,270. The engineer's
estimate was $1,404,019.95.
The project budget amounts are $1,300,000 (2010) and $1,400,000 (2011). The 2010
budget amount also includes funds for the Stonegate Lift Station Conveyance
Improvement project (projected completion date September, 2010) which will require
$875,888.86 of the $1,300,000. The low bid is within the amount budgeted for the
combined 2010/2011 budget for this project.
The project will build a new, larger Stonegate sanitary sewer lift station to replace the
existing undersized Stonegate and Summerwind lift stations.
Attachments
cc: Gregg Zimmerman, PW Administrator
Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
Dave Christensen, Wastewater Utility Supervisor
H:\File Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-3473 Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\CONSTRUCTION\Lift
Station\Contract lnfo\Award-Clerk-Stonegate Replacement.doc\JDHtp 7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 11 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BIDfJATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
r< No. Description
Unit
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
;Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Est.
Quantity
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
. 200
1
55
150
25
2
1.
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
City of Renton
Engineers Estimate
Unit
Price
$91,000.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
$12.00
$15.00
$15.00
$40,000.00
$15.00
$15.00
$40.00
$10,000.00
$45.00
$50.00
$50,00
$2,000.00
$3,000.00
$5,000.00
$4,500.00
$1,000.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$2.00
$70.00
$5,000.00
$30,000.00
$25.00
$45.00
$50.00
$45.00
$2,500.00
$50.00
$25.00
$1,000.00
$45.00
$500.00
$5,000.00
$40,000.00
$70,000.00
$50,000.00
$65,000.00
$120,000.00
$35,000.00
$93,000.00
$25,000.00
$45,000.00
$6,000.00
$7,500.00
$115,000.00
$90,000.00
$45,000.00
$125,000.00
$12,500.00
$12.00
$10,000.00
$15,000.00
Subtotal
Tax 9.5%
Bid
Amount
91,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
10,000.00
1,200.00
6,750.00
750.00
40,000.00
2,250.00
1,950.00
8,000.00
10,000.00
2,475.00
7,500.00
1,250.00
4,000.00
3,000.00
5,000.00
4,500.00
1,000.00
2,500.00
5,100.00
2,800.00
710.00
7,700.00
5,000.00
30,000.00
625.00
4,050.00
1,000.00
11,475.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
1,375.00
1,000.00
4,050.00
2,000.00
5,000.00
40,000.00
70,000.00
50,000.00
65,000.00
120,000.00
35,000.00
93,000.00
25,000.00
45,000.00
6,000.00
7,500.00
115,000.00
90,000.00
45,000.00
125,000.00
12,500.00
13,200.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
$1,282,210.00
$121,809.95
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 Oil/Water Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-lnch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 • Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Total $1,404,019.95
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 12 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
h No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
^Shoreline,Construction Cd..:
liriciS
;:;;:;Bjdj|l
; Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 Oil/Water Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam.. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work'
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1 .
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
li;20,OPO;00 ;
lil|!,56b.66'
|||o;fbbjbo>:
IllfbobSg-;
H!IS:;Vr:bbf
|;;llK;ii;bb2
!;f|j|l5.bbl
;!::22lpbb:pb;|
HMI-bb::
IjllSKbp:^
||;i:b;!bbl:pb^
iffilllp-bbs
lliillslbbl;
illli^ejbb;;:
llllfsbbjoo:;::
liSiibSbb;;-
lllilboM-
lSi!3lob:pp^
|, • ?;2,i2ob7boi;-
::|!l3'5;baf
.,-;.. |Sii6a;bb:;:
M'SfWMU:
:'Sji|g5jbbJ}
|:u5,bqbiQ;;5:
|S|f,pbb1Sffi:
:|i:;|::!:25jbl:!
|liftj75:Q9;:;
jglllpiob ;
:l::;j|fp|Sb
Jifm|gg::'::
|::|||||)ffi::;
1, ^,3ppio|
f;5,raQ;pb:::;
W3b,gpb1bb/
i:25;0pp;bb;;
l:4b,op(|bb:i
||75,&iPP;;:
||§5,qob!bb'
@35,bbb;bo^
PimJmM'
v^Cpppibii!
i;;i8,b1p6oG
j||5;bbbSbp|
jlli,ipbb;p(il
;|M,pob;bb:j
;|pb,bbb;pb;:
S|4',bbb;00;::
|^3P,pbp;bp^
If i's.oSovod e
iSllllKI
?f|SbbpJbb;|
l||Subtpt|lI
™Ifax^sil
j:^2p;ooo.pp;
tlfllbbpSp'
:|:::3bvbpb.bbi
'I;;i:f5llpp;bb;
fiibbSb:
M;:;::n!ibBp:
fs^ibJop
::i|p22^oo6:bb
::Ia:i,65p::bb
::|a;i,43p:bb
;:fi:9;6baoa
;-:|:!b;boo.p6-
i:;:j2y2oo:ob;
MSJ5O.0
:'• ^650.00
i \ ;3,600.00
:i i;-2;lbb;00
;{ ;;;:|-4pP;p0
': \i:p;bbp!b0i
::v • ;:2^2bb;bb
:Ci:f6,6bb;pP:
•£ff,4J$.00"
l:;l6,72b;D0
:;l;Eb65.00
IPgsabo
fysjpbaob
Irlljbbblbb:
: f 1625.00:
• €170.00;
; -1^500.00
-p 71650.00
ifvi^ob.oo;
:;::;j2,00b;0b
||I3;;375^0;
fffSbq.00
:-:: jflqpipp:
|:::i5;bob;bb
}||3b;066"00;
:|:25;poo,bo:
l;§3;opo;po
;:;:v|5]QQ0;pb
i:;:65;obb:pb
;=i 35 ^oopTSd
:::;;:7b;obb;bb;
:;:22,00b:pb
u;i8,opb.bo
a :5,000X10
f;;;5lopb;bb
/riS;bbb;bo
;;iob^pbipo
|;i4;bbb|jb
tl3p,bbb.;ob
;::i:|,bob:bb
|/;;|,ibp;oo
IJllJpJbJbo
l||;i)p.bo
;::;$1,f08,piP.OO:
::|^1Q5i2§0.95.
iTotali: ;$1,213,270.95
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 13 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
h- No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
Plats Plus Inc.
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 OilAA/ater Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard.
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
87,000.00
1,500.00
5,000.00
4,700.00
30.00
21.00
28.00
1,000.00
25.00
26.00
100.00
60,000.00
23.00
27.00'
51.00
890.00
1,050.00
4,300.00
8.800.0P
1.4P0.00
100.00
185.00
210.00
2.00
69.00
4,700.00
14,000.00
10.00
23.00
75.00
30.00
1,100.00
45.00
45.00
2,200.00
35.00
250.00
6,000.00
9,000.00
6,000.00
20,000.00
95,000.00
170,000.00
54,000.00
74,000.00
20.PPP.00
•15,000.00
2,500.00
3,000.00
117.0PP.P0
103,000.00
13,000.00
119,000.00
2,000.00
20.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
87,000.00
1,500.00
5,000.00
4,700.00
3,000.00
9,450.00
1,400.00
1,000.00
3,750.00
3,380.00
20,000.00
60.PP0.00
1,265.00
4,050.00
1,275.00
1,780.00
1,050.00
4,300.00
8,800.00
1,400.00
5,000.00
15,725.00
8,400.00
710.00
7,590.00
4.700.PO
14,000.00
250.00
2,070.00
1,500.00
7,650.00
1,100.00
2,250.00
2,475.00
2,200.00
3,150.00
1,000.00
6,000.00
9,000.00
6,000.00
20,000.00
95,000.00
170,000.00
. 54.000.0P
74.PP0.0P
20,000.00
15,000.00
2,500.00
3,000.00
117,000.00
103,000.00
13,000.00
119,000.00
2,000.00
22,000.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
Subtotal $1,170,370.00
Tax 9.5% $111,185.15
Total $1,281,555.15
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 14 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
h No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
Massana Construction Inc.
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 " Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 OilAA/ater Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C9PP Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
70,500.00
2,000.00
20,000.00
10,000.00
50.00
22.00
30.PO
2,000.00
32.00
30,00
95.00
60,000.00
35.00
35.00
60.00
1,300.00
1,300.00
2,400.00
5,000.00
8,000.00
100.00
90.00
280.00
2.00
65.00
30,000.00
12,000.00
30.00
31.00
73.00
20.00
1,000.00
50.PP
30.00
1,000.00
18.00
400.00
2,500.00
40,000.00
50,00P.O0
20,000.00
65,000.00
115,000.00
20,000.00
91,000.00
45,000.00
30,000.00
3,000.00
2,000.00
110.P00.00
92,000.00
20,000:00
120,000.00
2,000.00
20.00
10,000.00
10.000.0P
70,500.00
2,000.00
20,000.00
10,000.00
5,000.00
9,900.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
4,800.00
3,900.00
19,000.00
60,000.00
1,925.00
5,250.00
1,500.00
2,600.00
1,300.00
2,400.00
5,000.00
8,000.00
5,000.00
7,650.00
11,200.00
710.00
7,150.00
30,000.00
12,000.00
750.00
2,790.00
1,460.00
5,100.00
1,000.00
2,500.00
1,650.00
1,000.00
1,620.00
1,600.00
2,500.00
40,000.00
50.PPO.00
20,000.00
65,000.00
115,000.00
20,000.00
91,000.00
45,000.00
30,000.00
3,000.00
2,000.00
110,000.00
92,000.00
20,000.00
120,000.00
2,000.00
22,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
Subtotal $1,199,255.00
Tax 9.5% $113,929.23
Total $1,313,184.23
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 15 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
r> No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
R. L. Alia Company
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 Oil/Water Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 • 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
35,000.00
2,500.00
1,000.00
7,500.00
40.00
15.00
20.00
35,000.00
20.00
20.00
140.25
10,000.00
328.00
150.00
498.40
1,000.00
2,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5.000.PP
60.00
70.00
100.00
25.00
100.00
3,900.00
12,750.00
25.00
32.00
73.00
25.00
2,025.00
50.00
20.00
1,250.00
100.00
250.00
22.000.0P
20,000.00
1,000.00
30,000.00
120,000.00
120,000.00
35,000.00
23;954.00
50,000.00
40,000.00
15,000.00
50,000.00
106,500.00
110.0P0.00
6,800.00
116,000.00
10,000.00
15.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
35,000.00
2,500.00
1,000.00
7,500.00
4,000.00
6,750.00
1,000.00
35,000.00
3,000.00
2,600.00
28,050.00
10,000.00
18,040.00
22,500.00
12,460.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
3,000.00
5,950.00
4,000.00
8,875.00
11,000.00
3,900.00
12,750.00
625.00
2,880.00
1,460.00
6,375.00
2,025.00
2,500.00
1,100.00
1,250.00
9,000.00
1,000.00
22,000.00
20,000.00
1,000.00
30,000.00
120,000.00
120,POO.00
35,000.00
23,954.00
50,000.00
40,000.00
15,000.00
50,000.00
106,500.00
110.000.0P
6,800.00
116,000.00
10,000.00
16,500.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
Subtotal $1,258,844.00
Tax 9.5% $119,590.18
Total $1,378,434.18
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 16 of 146
Project Titie:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
r- No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
Ceccanti
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 OilAA/ater Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls.
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1'
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
50,000.00
500.00
1,000.00
15,000.00
10.00
14.00
14.00
50,000.00
20.00
20.00
100.00
75,000.00
40.00
42.00
50.00
1,100.00
1,200.00
5,300.00
5,300.00
2,000.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
5.00
55.00
5,500.00
15,000.00
25.00
40.00
100.00
30.00
1,200.00
55.00
21.39
1,300.00
20.00
350.00
50,000.00
90,000.00
50,000.00
80,000.00
60,000.00
90,000.00
20,000.00
50,000.00
62,000.00
1,000.00
3,800.00
12,000.00
125,000.00
120,000.00
15,000.00
100,000.00
2,000.00
1.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
50,000.00
500.00
1,000.00'
15,000.00
1,000.00
6,300.00
700.00
50,000.00
3,000.00
2,600.00
20,000.00
75,000.00
2,200.00
6,300.00
1,250.00
2,200.00
1,200.00
5,300.00
5,300.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
5,525.00
2,800.00
1,775.00
6,050.00
5,500.00
15,000.00
625.00
3,600.00
2,000.00
7,650.00
1,200.00
2,750.00
1,176.45
1,300.00
1,800.00
1,400.00
50,000.00
90,000.00
50,000.00
80,000.00
60,000.00
90,000.00
20,000.00
50,000.00
62,000.00
1,000.00
3,800.00
12,000.00
125,000.00
120,000.00
15,000.00
100,000.00
2,000.00
1,100.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
Subtotal $1,265,901.45
Tax 9.5% $120,260.64
Total $1,386,162.09
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 17 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
h No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
Rodarte Construction, Inc.
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
. 3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 GravelBorrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-lnch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe.
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 OilAA/ater Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
LumpSum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
75,000.00
500.00
• 5,000.00
5,000.00
50.00
18.00
65.00
2,500.00
30.00
30.00
120.00
10,000.00
65.00
65.00
115.00
800.00
1,500.00
6,200.00
8,000.00
4,500.00
145.00
145.00
145.00
3.00
90.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
50.00
35.00
80.00
32.00
1,200.00
50.00
42.00
1,500.00
50.00
350.00
5,000.00
36,000.00
44,000.00
105,000.00
78,000.00
145,000.00
38,500.00
38,500.00
17,500.00
32,000.00
6,500.00
9,500.00
150,000.00
130.00P.00
7,600.00
132,000.00
15.00P.00
15.00
18,000.00
20,000.00
75,000.00
500.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
8,100.00
3,250.00
2,500.00
4,500.00
3,900.00
24.00P.P0
10,000.00
3,575.00
9,750.00
2,875.00
1,600.00
1,500.00
6,200.00
8,000.00
4,500.00
7,250.00
12,325.00
5,800.00
1,065.00
9,900.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
1,250.00
3,150.00
1,600.00
8,160.00
1,200.00
2,500.00
2,310.00
1,500.00
4,500.00
1,400.00
5,000.00
36,000.00
44,000.00
105,000.00
78,000.00
145,000.00
38,500.00
38,500.00
17,500.00
32,000.00
6,500.00
9,500.00
150,000.00
130,000.00
7,600.00
132,000.00
15,000.00
16,500.00
18,000.00
20,000.00
Subtotal $1,313,260.00
Tax 9.5% $124,759.70
Total $1,438,019.70
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 18 of 146
0Q
.*-. CD
c .-_
^Q_
LU a
c
3
E •
E E E E E
3 r3 n 3 3
COCOCOCOCCCCOG
a. o. a. o. P P P o. p ."-> ," EEEEhhhEhhh
3333 _-
o o o ooo o o o o o .-o o o o oo CO o o o LO CO o o o o in CM •<-o o o o o o o o o o CM •* o o o CO CO CO o o o o o •* o o o o o o o o m r-m CO o o o o CD CD o o in r-CD •*-o o o o o T-o o o LO CM o o o o o tf o o o o m CD o o o o o CD o o o o o LO o o o o o _-o o o o o o o o LO r~ T-o o o LO N. CO o o o o o LO o o o o o •* o o in CM CD t-o o o o CM o o o o CM o o o CD CO o o o o CM T" o o o LO CO o o o CO 1-o o o o o CM o o o LO CD o o o o CM •^ o o o o o CO o o o o o LO ooooo ooooo d d d d d ooooo ooooo ooooo ooooo oooo ooooo CM O O LO LO LO CD CD
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
o o
o o
o o
O CO CD O
O CM CM CM
O LO CD
O <D t
O h- O LO O
CM" M-" CD~ CD"
O O LO
3 O
3 O
•> LO
CM
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
CD
O
O
O
CO
O
O
LO
CO
o o
CM
CO
o o
o o
CM
o o
LO
r-
o
o
CD'
CM
o o
o o o
o o
LO
r-
oooooo oooooo
oooo
CO LO o
o o
o" d
o o
o o
LO~ LO"
o o
o o o
CD
O
O
O
o o
CD
O
O
O
O
O
O
CO
o o
o o o
CD
O
o o o o
CM
o
O O
O
O
LO
CD
O
O
O
O
O
CO
o o
CM
CM
o o
o o o
o
CM
•«- T- T- T- O lO LO T- r-LO
CM
O O
CD CM
O LO
LO LO
E o o
3 o o
C C LY) U- LL
° ° Q-ra 15
u_ .c x: x: x: x:
_ o o o o o
— i_ w ro ro ro ro ro ro
F000l__LUL_JLUL_J
-5 .£ .E .__
oo'o'o'oE E12
O O O O O 3 3 CO
Ll-li_U.U-Ll.CO CO >-
a. a. o
E E 5
__3 3 —
_____ o
m
CI)
c
ra (I)
C
m II)
c
ra ID
c
m
m __
o
o
1
"m
m
_j
>-
__
CO
u
CO
o
o
II
m
A)
_i
r
o
ra HI
>-
CO
B. u-
EEEEEEEEE E E E E E E
CO
a.
cococococococococococococococo
Cd D. Q.
E 2» LU E E
__.__.CL__.
E E E E
Q. Q.
E E
a. o. o. a. a. o.
CO CO
o. a.
E E E E E
E E
3 3
CO CO
a. a.
E E
a.
o o a.
. CO
o
O
•o
0
XI '» ~
i= 3
3 cn
^_5
in -1
< ~o
"a --•
O ffi 0
a.
Q.
f-ro _2
ra o)- __ *=
cn E
o
O <D -
__
- 3
CO
UJ
• £ 4
' _?__!
Q_
|S§I
ID O
a. __
CO H
•^ ra
o 0
O 0_
I °
o Q_
CQ -o
— a>
g> _=
> in c_ in
ra ra a. g _i
O § H O O
_M
O
0) >
™CL
CO ^
x: <L>
o x_
f- -? 33
3 y. ra
CO in o
-o <S O
0 O -= ~.
in <
X
0
a> a.
_- 0)
5 ID
a) co
E o
S«
i>
El
5°
__: o
o c
c- —
T CM
co T-
5
co P O
ral
| 3 8 i
co o
£•"
ra <D
ID CO
E
a)
co
__: >
> ro
ID >
Q
Q_
I i
E °
CO >, (J 0 ID
O LU
T- - __••*_;.__«
Hh a
ra ra _. !s CO <" i? w CO
ID _
CO CO
O
o
CD
CD O
O O > >
0- a.
EE E
co
ro ra
m ca
ra ra '^r F; Q c ro
__ b
o __: x: o o ~ x:
ro
XI
3
O
ID
O £
a) o
o. c:
,>, o
H O
ID tt)
P J2
^ =
co __
ID in
ID 5,
a)
o
c
o
O
0
u. O
o o
ro ro
O O
-=-=-)
O ^
0 ro
I- -J
co 0
o E
o 0
h- O
0
E
0
OOO
ro
O
"__
0
E
0
in ra _^.
- =f 8
o
c ro
ro o
CD LU
D) E
CO
o
t
0 >
O
£ co
O
0- . JS -K
m
i1 ~e
_0 0- 0 0
in • m "ffi
w I y __
f? b
o
in
cn in
Q.
0-
E
3
D.
O)
c
X)
__:
o
0
5
0 co
0
i-
E
M ro
o <
CO
o
"ro
t—
0
CZ
CO
3
t_
ro
to
ro
XI
<
CO
J-; ^ -a
ra —I c
2 0 'a
= a 0
-2. <u E
o S S "
o o _ . .
° ° § .2 o
GOnOmwjj
o
-9- >
xi 5»
CO CO
_____>*-*-
D. Q. O J J
_S jS o ro
0
CD
0
E
3 CJ
co co
••___>•_.•«
in ™ 0
CO H
__ J2
X X
LU LU
CMM^_UDCD_^ODCDC:'T_C,,,COT,'LncD,v-oocno,_CNl<^":fLncO l"~ °° CD CO cn
CO CO
O T- CM CO Tf IO <D S CO O. O T-
-. v m in
CM CO •* LO CD r~
LO LO LO LO LO LO
o o o CM CD O CD CO CO «• CO oo M" O CM CO T-__- <«-
o
CO to
r-
7
c
.
‐
C
i
t
y
C
l
e
r
k
r
e
p
o
r
t
s
b
i
d
o
p
e
n
i
n
g
o
n
8
/
2
4
/
2
0
1
0
f
o
r
C
A
G
‐
1
0
‐
0
8
7
,
S
t
o
n
e
g
a
t
e
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
;
1
4
b
i
d
s
;
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
’
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
P
a
g
e
1
9
o
f
1
4
6
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
r- No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-lnch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 Oil/Water Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-lnch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
. 90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
Oceanside Construction, Inc.
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
60,000.00
1,000.00
4,000.00
6,700.00
52.00
28.00
27.00
555.00
28.00
28.00
107.00
55,000.00
80.00
23.00
45.00
1,0O0.P0
1,200.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
3,200.00
40.00
121.00
166.00
1.00
200.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
28.00
32.00
159.00
24.00
1,000.00
104.00
30.00
1,389.00
44.00
250.00
15,000.00
30,000.00
161,000.00
44,000.00
56,000.00
89,000.00
51,000.00
107,000.00
14.0PP.O0
1.60P.00
500.00
2,000.00
130,000.00
131,000.00
16,000.00
138,000.00
5,000.00
20.00
8,200.00
8,000.00
60,000.00
1,000.00
4,000.00
6,700.00
5,200.00
12,600.00
1,350.00
555.00
4,200.00
3,640.00
21,400.00
55,000.00
4,400.00
3,450.00
1,125.00
2,000.00
1,200.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
3,200.00
2,000.00
10,285.00
6,640.00
355.00
22,000.00
15,000.00
15,000.00
700.00
2,880.00
3,180.00
6,120.00
1,000.00
5,200.00
1,650.00
1,389.00
3,960.00
1,000.00
15,000.00
30,000.00
161,000.00
44,000.00
56.00P.00
89,000.00
51,000.00
107,000.00
14,000.OP
1,600.00
500.00
2,000.00
1.30,000.00
131,000.00
16,000.00
138,000.00
5,000.00
22,000.00
8.200.0P
8.PPP.P0
Subtotal $1,328,679.00
Tax 9.5% $126,224.51
Total $1,454,903.51
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 20 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE
E Item
r- No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
August 24, 2010
Description
Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
Spill Prevention, Control and Countemneasures (SPCC) Plan
Traffic Control
Construction Surveying and As-Builts .
Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
Gravel Borrow (as required)
Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
Crushed Surfacing Base Course
HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
Facility Coatings
6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
12-inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
Oil/Water Separator
48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
1-Inch Water Service Connection
8-Inch Piam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
12-lnch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
Televison Inspection
8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
Landscaping
Top Soil Type C
Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
Chain Link Fence
Chain Link Gate
Cement Concrete Sidewalk
Quarry Spalls (as required)
Pavement Marking
Gravity Block Wall
Bollard
Site Clearing and Grading
Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
Dewatering System
144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
Lift Station Piping
Lift Station Accessories
Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
Mechanical Work
Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
Electrical Work
Instrument,, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
Standby Generator Set
Testing and Startup Services
Imported Backfill Material
Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Unit
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Est.
Quantity
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130.
200
1
55
150
25
2
1 ,
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
'1,100
1
1
Boss Construction, Inc.
Unit
Price
104,000.00
5,000.00
20,000.00
5,000.00
50.00
19.00
22.00
4,000.00
18.00
18.00
93.00
45,000.00
45.00
36.00
83.00
600.00
700.00
3,500.00
3,000.00
1,500.00
100.00
70.00
200.00
5.00
60.00
15,000.00
13,000.00
40.00
20.00
80.00
25.00
500.00
40.00
20.00
1,300.00
24.00
500.00
30,000.00
83,000.00
84,800.00
75,000.00
46,000.00
95,000.00
19,000.00
60,000.00
56,000.00
38,000.00
2,400.00
9,000.00
115,000.00
117,000.00
17.00P.O0
116,000.00
3,000.00
19.00
20,000.00
22,000.00
Bid
Amount
104,000.00
5,000.00
20,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
8,550.00
1,100.00
4,000.00
2,700.00
2,340.00
18,600.00
45,000.00
2,475.00
5,400.00
2,075.00
1,200.00
700,00
3,500.00
3,000.00
1,500.00
5,000.00
5,950.00
8,000.00
1,775.00
6,600.00
15,000.00
13,000.00
1,000.00
1,800.00
1,600.00
6,375.00
500.00
2,000.00
1,100.00
1,300.00
2,160.00
2,000.00
30,000.00
83,000.00
84,800.00
75,000.00
46,000.00
95,000.00
19,000.00
60,000.00
56,000.00
38,000.00
2,400.00
9,000.00
115,0PP.PO
117.PPP.00
17,000.00
116.0PP.PP
3,000.00
20,900.PP
2P.POO.00
22,000.00
Subtotal $1,345,400.00
Tax 9.5% $127,813.00
Total $1,473,213.00
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 21 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
b No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total) Lump Sum 1
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan Lump Sum 1
3 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts Lump Sum 1
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material Ton 100
6 Gravel Borrow (as required) Ton 450
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench Ton 50
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B Lump Sum 1
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required) Ton 150
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course Ton 130
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22 Ton 200
12 Facility Coatings Lump Sum 1
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 55
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot .150
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot. 25
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P Each 2
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage Each 1
18 Oil/Water Separator Each 1
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I Each 1
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection Each 1
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 50
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 85
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 40
24 Televison Inspection Lineal Foot 355
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main Lineal Foot 110
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls Lump Sum 1
27 Landscaping Lump Sum 1
28 Top Soil Type C Cubic Yard 25
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter Lineal Foot 90
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance Square-Yard 20
31 Chain Link Fence Lineal Foot 255
32 Chain Link Gate. Each 1
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk Square-Yard 50
34 Quarry Spalls (as required) Ton 55
35 Pavement Marking LumpSum 1
36 Gravity Block Wall Square-Foot 90
37 Bollard Each 4
38 Site Clearing and Grading Lump Sum 1
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill Lump Sum 1
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems LumpSum 1
41 Dewatering System Lump Sum 1
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well LumpSum 1
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault Lump Sum 1
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault Lump Sum 1
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall Lump Sum 1
46 Lift Station Piping Lump Sum 1
47 Lift Station Accessories Lump Sum 1
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains LumpSum 1
49 Mechanical Work Lump Sum 1
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors Lump Sum 1
51 Electrical Work Lump Sum 1
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work Lump Sum 1
53 Standby Generator Set Lump Sum 1
54 Testing and Startup Services Lump Sum 1
55 Imported Backfill Material Ton 1,100
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment LumpSum 1
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment Lump Sum 1
Mid Mountain Contractors Inc.
Unit
Price
100,000.00
1,000.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
45.00
20.00
22.00
45,000.00
32.00
35.00
110.00
72,000.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
1,600.00
4,300.00
8,000.00
4,500.00
1,250.00
50.00
100.00
90.00
4.00
60.00
5,500.00
13,000.00
35.00
58.00
150.0P
28.00
350.00
90.00
26.00
1,500.00
40.00
600.00
7,000.00
32,000.00
118,000.00
55,000.00
65,000.00
110,000.00
35,000.00
82,000.00
32,000.00
27,000.00
4,000.00
20,000.00
126,000.00
117,0PP.00
7,000.00
120,000.00
3,700.00
22.00'
14,000.00
15,000.00
Bid
Amount
100,000.00
1,000.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
4,500.00
9,000.00
1,100.00
45,000.00
4,800.00
4,550.00
22,000.00
72,000.00
1,650.00
5,250.00
1,000.00
3,200:00
4,300.00
8,000.00
4,500.00
1,250.00
2,500.00
8,500.00
3,600.00
1,420.00
6,600.00
5,500.00
13,000.00
875.00
5,220.00
3,000.00
7,140.00
350.00
4,500.00
1,430.00
1,500.00
3,600.00
2,400.00
7,000.00
32,000.00
118,000.00
55,000.00
65,000.00
110,000.00
35,000.00
82,000.00
32,000.00
27,000.00
4,000.00
20,000.00
126,000.00
117,000.00
7,000.00
120,000.00
3,700.00
24,200.00
14,000.00
15,000.PP
Subtotal $1,388,135.00
Tax 9.5% $131,872.83
Total $1,520,007.83
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 22 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
b No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
Omega Contractors Inc.
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countenneasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-lnch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 Oil/Water Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-lnch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
20,000.00
1,600.00
1,700.00
7,400.00
36.00
18.00
24.00
10,000.00
22.00
22.00
125.00
76,000.00
150.00
150.00
200.00
1,850.00
2,000.00
7,000.00
4,000.00
3,300.00
176.00
130.00
140.00
5.00
125.00
6,000.00
14,800.00
40.00
40.00
140.00
30.00
1,000.00
85.00
36.00
1,425.00
30.00
500. OP
1,400.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
41,200.00
110,000.00
153,000.00
60.000.PO
93,571.00
31,192.00
45,450.00
8,600.00
10,500.00
132,000.00
154,000.00
' 8,000.00
132.000.0P
8,000.00
20.00
13,500.00
16,500.00
2O.00P.0O
1,600.00
1,700.00
7,400.00
3,600.00
8,100.00
1,200,00
10,000.00
3,300.00
2,860.00
25,000.00
76,000.00
8,250.00
22,500.00
5,000.00
3,700.00
2,000.00
7,000.00
4,000.00
3,300.00
8,800.00
11,050.00
5,600.00
1,775.00
13,750.00
6,000.00
14,800.00
1,000.00
3,600.00
2,800.00
7,650.00
1,000.00
4,250.00
1,980.00
1,425.00
2,700.00
2,000.00
1,400.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
41,200.00
110,000.00
153,000.00
60,000.00
93,571.00
, 31,192.00
45,450.00
8,600.00
10,500.00
132,000.00
154,000.00
8,000.00
132,000.00
8,000.00
22,000.00
13,500.00
16,500.00
Subtotal $1,387,603.00
Tax 9.5% $131,822.29
Total $1,519,425.29
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 23 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
r- No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
McClure and Sons Inc.
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 Oil/Water Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-lnch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Televison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 Landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
75,000.00
1.00P.PO
1,000.00
5,000.00
40.00
20.00
30.00
9,000.00
20.00
25.00
100.00
60,000.00
186.00
86.00
130.0P
1,600.00
1,700.00
5,500.00
7,000.00
3,000.00
75.00
225.00
250.00
2.00
95.00
20,000.00
15,000.00
55.00
25.00
75.00
30.00
2,000.00
40.00
30.00
1,500.00
20.00
320.00
4,000.00
32,000.00
112,000.00
33,000.00
65,000.00
80,000.00
50,000.00
130,000.00
25,000.00
1,000.00
3,000.00
28,000.00
133,000.00
113,000.00
15,000.00
125,000.00
10.000.0P
22.P0
50,000.00
50,000.00
75,000.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
5,000.00
4,000.00
9,000.00
1,500.00
9,000.00
3,000.00
3,250.00
20,000.00
: 60,000.00
10,230.00
12,900.00
3,250.00
3,200.00
1,700.00
5,500.00
7,000.00
3,000.00
3,750.00
19,125.00
10,000.00
710.00
10,450.00
20,000.00
15,000.00
1,375.00
2,250.00
1,500.00
7,650.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,650.00
1,500.00
1,800.00
1,280.00
4,000.00
32,000.00
112,000.00
33,000.00
65,000.00
80,000.00
50,000.00
130,000.00
25,000.00
1,000.00
3,000.00
28,000.00
133.0PP.0O
113,000.00
15,000.00
125.0PO.OO
10,000.00
24,200.00
50,000.00
50,000.00
Subtotal - $1,423,770.00
Tax 9.5% $135,258.15
Total $1,559,028.15
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 24 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
b No. Description
Unit Est.
Quantity
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total) Lump Sum 1
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan Lump Sum 1
3 Traffic Control LumpSum 1
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts Lump Sum 1
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material Ton 100
6 Gravel Borrow (as required) Ton 450
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench Ton 50
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B Lump Sum 1
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required) Ton 150
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course Ton 130
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22 Ton 200
12 Facility Coatings LumpSum 1
13 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 55
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 150
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 25
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P Each 2
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage Each 1
18 Oil/Water Separator Each 1
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I Each 1
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection Each 1
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 50
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 85
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe Lineal Foot 40
24 Televison Inspection Lineal Foot 355
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main Lineal Foot 110
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls Lump Sum 1
27 Landscaping LumpSum 1
28 Top Soil Type C Cubic Yard 25
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter Lineal Foot 90
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance Square-Yard 20
31 Chain Link Fence Lineal Foot 255
32 Chain Link Gate Each 1
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk Square-Yard 50
34 Quarry Spalls (as required) Ton 55
35 Pavement Marking Lump Sum 1
36 Gravity Block Wall Square-Foot 90
37 Bollard Each 4
38 Site Clearing and Grading Lump Sum 1
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill Lump Sum 1
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems Lump Sum 1
41 Dewatering System Lump Sum 1
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well LumpSum 1
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault Lump Sum 1
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault Lump Sum 1
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall Lump Sum ' 1
46 Lift Station Piping Lump Sum 1
47 Lift Station Accessories Lump Sum 1
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains Lump Sum 1
49 Mechanical Work LumpSum 1
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors Lump Sum 1
51 Electrical Work LumpSum 1
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work Lump Sum 1
53 Standby Generator Set LumpSum 1
54 Testing and Startup Services Lump Sum 1
55 Imported Backfill Material Ton 1,100
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment LumpSum 1
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment Lump Sum 1
'ivetta Brothers Construction, Inc.
Unit
Price
129,076.00
450.00
16,517.00
4,752.00
30.00
15.25
25.00
3,000.00
30.00
30.00
123.00
72,580.00
36.00
15.00
40.00
915.00
950.00
5,750.00
7,201.00
1,058.00
33.00
98.00
143.00
3.50
56.25
5,500.00
14,559.00
45.00
36.00
86.00
34.00
1,271.00
58.00
23.50
1,471.00
20.50
710.00
18,895.00
67,867.00
71,714.00
82,627.00
82,598.00
190,984.00
64,085.00
75,946.00
72,155.00
21,336.00
5,795.00
13,302.00
118,056.00
104,350.00
13,400.00
120,317.00
60,000.00
15.25
21,007.00
22,459.00
Bid
Amount
129,076.00
450.00
16,517.00
4,752.00
3,000.00
6,862.50
1,250.00
3,000.00
4,500.00
3,900.00
24,600.00
72,580.00
1,980.00
2,250.00
1,000.00
1,830.00
950.00
5,750.00
7,201.00
1,058.00
1,650.00
8,330.00
5,720.00
1,242.50
6,187.50
5,500.00
14,559.00
1,125.00
3,240.00
1,720.00
8,670.00
1,271.00
2,900.00
1,292.50
1,471.00
1,845.00
2,840.00
18,895.00
67,867.00
71,714.00
82,627.00
82,598.00
190,984.00
64,085.00
75,946.00
72,155.00
21,336.00
5,795.00
13,302.00
118,056.00
104,350.00
13,400.00
120,317.00
60,000.00
16,775.00
21,007.00
22,459.00
Subtotal $1,605,738.00
Tax 9.5% $152,545.11
Total $1,758,283.11
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 25 of 146
Project Title:Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
BID DATE: August 24, 2010
E Item
h No.
Unit
Description
Est.
Quantity
Harbor Pacific Contractors, Inc.
Unit
Price
Bid
Amount
1 Mobilization (Not to Exceed 8% of Contract Total)
2 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan
3 Traffic Control
4 Construction Surveying and As-Builts
5 Removal and Replacement of Unsuitable Foundation Material
6 Gravel Borrow (as required)
7 Washed Rock for Infiltration Trench
8 Trench Shoring or Extra Excavation Class A and B
9 Crushed Surfacing Top Course (as required)
10 Crushed Surfacing Base Course
11 HMA Class 1/2" PG 64-22
12 Facility Coatings
13 . 6-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
14 8-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
15 12-Inch Diam. PVC Storm Sewer Pipe
16 Catch Basin Type 1 and 1P
17 Catch Basin Type 1 with Birdcage
18 Oil/Water Separator
19 48-Inch Diam. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Type I
20 1-Inch Water Service Connection
21 8-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
22 12-Inch Diam. PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe
23 12-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Gravity Sewer Pipe
24 Teievison Inspection
25 8-Inch Diam. PVC C900 Sewer Force Main
26 Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Controls
27 landscaping
28 Top Soil Type C
29 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
30 Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance
31 Chain Link Fence
32 Chain Link Gate
33 Cement Concrete Sidewalk
34 Quarry Spalls (as required)
35 Pavement Marking
36 Gravity Block Wall
37 Bollard
38 Site Clearing and Grading
39 Lift Station Excavation and Backfill
40 Lift Station Shoring and Trench Safety Systems
41 Dewatering System
42 144-Inch Diam. Precast Concrete Wet Well
43 Precast Concrete Overflow Storage Vault
44 Precast Concrete Flow Meter and Valve Vault
45 CMU Control Building with Screening Wall
46 Lift Station Piping
47 Lift Station Accessories
48 Control Building Plumbing, Including Roof Drains
49 Mechanical Work
50 Submersible Sewage Pumps and Motors
51 Electrical Work
52 Instrument, Alarm, Telemetry and Control Work
53 Standby Generator Set
54 Testing and Startup Services
55 Imported Backfill Material
56 Existing Stonegate Lift Station Abandonment
57 Existing Summerwind Lift Station Abandonment
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Ton
Ton
Ton
Lump Sum
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Each
Each
Each
Each
Each
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lineal Foot
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Cubic Yard
Lineal Foot
Square-Yard
Lineal Foot
Each
Square-Yard
Ton
Lump Sum
Square-Foot
Each
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Ton
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
1
1
1
1
100
450
50
1
150
130
200
1
55
150
25
2
1
1
1
1
50
85
40
355
110
1
1
25
90
20
255
1
50
55
1
90
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,100
1
1
102,000.00
1,500.00
18,000.00
9,000.00
33.10
31.80
29.70
20,500.00
34.50
34.00
120.00
58,000.00
56.20
59.50
105.00
1,600.00
2,400.00
7,200.00
24,000.00
3,000.00
115.00
315.00
148.00
2.00
130.00
52,000.00
12,000.00
32.00
34.00
90,00
23.00
1,150.00
80.00
48.00
2,000.00
20.00
400.00
47,320.00
61,240.00
64,365.00
98,150.00
82,000.00
128,000.00
31,500.00
80,000.00
65,000.00
42,000.00
5,000.00
21,000.00
132,000.00
98,600.00
12,500.00
105,000.00
6,479.00
20.15
30,600.00
28,770.00
102,000.00
1,500.00
18,000.00
9,000.00
3,310.00
14,310.00
1,485.00
20,500.00
5,175.00
4,420.00
24,000.00
58,000.00
3,091.00
8,925.00
2,625.00
3,200.00
2,400.00
7,200.00
24,000.00
3,000.00
5,750.00
26,775.00
5,920.00
710.00
14,300.00
52,000.00
12,000.00
800.00
3,060.00
1,800.00
5,865.00
1,150.00
4,000.00
2,640.00
2,000.00
1,800.00
1,600.00
47,320.00
61,240.00
64,365.00
98,150.00
82,000.00
128,000.00
31,500.00
80,000.00
65,000.00
42,OOP.00
v 5,000.00
21,000.00
132,000.00
98,600.00
12,500.00
105,000.00
6,479.00
22,165.00
30,600.00
28,770.00
Subtotal $1,620,000.00
Tax 9.5% $153,900.00
Total $1,773,900.00 7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 26 of 146
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
CAG-10-087
DATE: August 24, 2010
Page 1 of 2
BIDDER
Boss Construction, Inc.
4945 Guide Meridian
Bellingham, WA 98226
Tim Hart
Ceccanti
4118 Brookdale Rd. E.
Tacoma, WA 98446
Donna Motland
Harbor Pacific Contractors, Inc.
19628 144th Ave. NE, Ste. A
Woodinville, WA 98072
Nick DeVitis
Massana Construction, Inc.
2Tanglewood Island
Fox Island, WA 98333
Mark Massmann
McClure and Sons, Inc.
15714 Country Club Dr.
Mill Creek, WA 98012
Les McClure
MidMountain Contractors
P.O. Box 2909
Kirkland, WA 98083
Greg Steels
Oceanside Construction, Inc.
1225 E. Sunset Dr., Ste. 145
Bellingham, WA 98226
Joseph Baldwin
Omega Constractors, Inc.
P.O. Box 430
Duvall, WA 98019
Gordon Wagster
Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc.
P.O. Box 370
Sumner, WA 98390
Mark Pivetta
Plats Plus, Inc.
720 Cedar Ave, Ste. C
Marysville, WA 98270
FORMS
Proposal
& Triple
Form
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
L&l
Cert
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Bid
Bond
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sched.
of Prices
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Subs
List
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Addenda
1-5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BID
**lncludes Sales Tax
$1,473,213.00
$1,520,007.83
$1,386,162.09
$1,773,900.00
$1,313,184.00
$1,582,023.00
$1,559,028.15
$1,517,149.87
$1,454,903.51
$1,519,425.29
$1,758,283.11
$1,281,555.15
Brendan Reeves 7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 27 of 146
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: Stonegate Lift Station Replacement
CAG-10-087
DATE: August 24, 2010
Page 2 of 2
BIDDER
FORMS
Proposal
& Triple
Form
L&l
Cert.
Bid
Bond
Sched.
of Prices
Subs
List
Addenda
1-5
BID
**lncludes Sales Tax
R.L. Alia Company
107 Williams Ave. S.
Renton, WA 98057
Richard L. Alia
Rodarte Construction, Inc.
P.O. Box 1875
Auburn, WA 98071
J.R. Rodarte
Shoreline Construction, Co.
P.O. Box 358
Woodinville, WA 98072
Douglas J. Suzuki
Western Engineering Contractors
500 Locust St.
Ellensburg, WA 98926
Michael J. Wieck
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
LEGEND:
Forms: Triple Form: Non-Collusion Affidavit, Anti-Trust Claims, Minimum Wage
$1,281,555.15
$1,438,019.70
$1,213,270.95
$1,150,458.90
$1,432,938.90
$1,404,019.95
7c. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/24/2010 for CAG‐10‐087,
Stonegate Lift Station Replacement; 14 bids; engineer’s estimate Page 28 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Application by Barghausen Engineers for Partial
Release of Easement for Slopes; an area of
approximately 3,729 sq. ft. located at 10436 SE
Carr Rd. (File RE-10-002)
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
- Application, including legal description & map
- Easement For Slopes #5840168
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk, x6502
Recommended Action:
Refer to Transportation Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On May 19, 2010, Hal Grubb, P.E., 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, WA 98032, (Barghausen Engineers), filed
an application for partial release of Easement For Slopes. The area to be released consists of
approximately 3,729 sq. ft. located on the north side of Carr Rd, at 10436 SE Carr Rd, in a vicinity west
of 108th Ave. SE (SR 515) and east of Talbot Rd. S. The easement, dated 1/14/1965, was recorded
under King County Recording No. 5840168 and was obtained by the City from King County as part of
annexation in 2008. An application filing fee of $250 has been paid.
The Development Services Division has reviewed the Application for Partial Release of Easement, and
determined that the release of easement petition is valid and the legal description is now accurate.
Under RMC 9-1, Council should now: 1) Determine whether the release of easement proposal should
be granted, the classification of the easement, whether there are conditions of the approval, and
whether an appraisal is necessary to determine the amount of compensation to be paid, if any, and 2)
If so approved, adopt an ordinance to finalize the release if all determinations have been made and
all conditions have been met within 90 days of Council approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Take action as set forth in RMC 9-1
7d. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of Easement for
Slopes by Hal Grubb, Barghausen Engineers, 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, Page 29 of 146
7d. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of Easement for
Slopes by Hal Grubb, Barghausen Engineers, 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, Page 30 of 146
7d. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of Easement for
Slopes by Hal Grubb, Barghausen Engineers, 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, Page 31 of 146
7d. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of Easement for
Slopes by Hal Grubb, Barghausen Engineers, 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, Page 32 of 146
7d. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of Easement for
Slopes by Hal Grubb, Barghausen Engineers, 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, Page 33 of 146
7d. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of Easement for
Slopes by Hal Grubb, Barghausen Engineers, 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, Page 34 of 146
7d. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of Easement for
Slopes by Hal Grubb, Barghausen Engineers, 18215 72nd Ave. S., Kent, Page 35 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Appeal Code Revisions
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
l Issue Paper
l Draft Ordinance
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community and Economic Development
Staff Contact:
Rocale Timmons, ext. 7219
Recommended Action:
Refer to the Planning and Development
Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The current provisions governing appeals have not been reviewed in some time and certain legislative
changes have occurred which necessitate updates to the current code. To that end, staff and the City
Attorney Department have reviewed the applicable appeal provisions in its entirety and have concluded
that further updates and changes could also be made to refine the current appeal process.
Recommended changes include the removal of many sections of the appeal provisions as they are
repetitive and/or unnecessary. Additionally, provisions for reconsideration requests and standing for
appeals have been included in the recommended amendments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt code revisions to reflect recent legislative changes as it pertains to appeals.
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 36 of 146
h:\ced\city council\issue papers\2010\appeal code revision\appeal process issue paper.doc
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:August 16, 2010
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Alex Pietsch, Administrator (x 6592)
STAFF CONTACT:Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner (x7219)
SUBJECT:Appeal Code Revisions
ISSUE:
Should the City of Renton update the procedures for Appeals to the Hearing Examiner of
Administrative Decisions and Environmental Determinations as well as Appeals to the
Council?
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends revising Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110, Appeals, in order to
clarify procedures for appeals to the Hearing Examiner of Administrative Decisions and
Environmental Determinations as well as appeals to Council.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The current provisions governing appeals have not been reviewed in some time and
certain legislative changes and judicial decisions have occurred which necessitate
updates to the current code. To that end, staff and the City Attorney have reviewed the
applicable appeal provisions in its entirety and have concluded that further updates and
changes could also be made to refine the current appeal process.
Recommended changes include the removal of many sections of the appeal
provisions as they are repetitive and/or unnecessary. Provisions for
reconsideration requests have been added, which require land use decisions be
held in abeyance pending the outcome of the reconsideration. A new 14-day
appeal period would commence upon the issuance of the reconsideration
decision.
Additionally, changes to the current code would prevent parties who fail to participate
in the public hearing, to then emerge after the fact when dissatisfied with the result. A
party would only have standing to pursue an appeal if the party "participates" in the
hearing process. A party can "participate" in the following ways:
1.Testify or give oral comments at the public hearing; or
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 37 of 146
Don Persson, Council President
Page 2 of 2
August 16, 2010
h:\ced\city council\issue papers\2010\appeal code revision\appeal process issue paper.doc
2.Submit written comments to City staff or the Hearing Examiner prior to the close
of the public hearing.
CONCLUSION:
Currently, the code provisions are not consistent with recent legislative changes and
judicial decisions. The revisions would update the City’s Appeal Code to reflect those
recent legislative changes. Additionally, the inclusion of provisions for standing along
with the removal of several sections, which are unnecessary, would simplify and refine
the appeal process.
cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Larry Warren, City Attorney
C. E. “Chip” Vincent, Planning Director
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Suzanne Dale Estey, Economic Development Director
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 38 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 39 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 40 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 41 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 42 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 43 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 44 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 45 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 46 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 47 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 48 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 49 of 146
7e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends
amending City Code to adopt legislative changes regarding appeal Page 50 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
changes and 2011 CDBG funding
recommendations
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
1. Revised 2010 CDBG allocations
2. Issue Paper
3. Funding Recommendations
4. Contingency Funding Plan
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community Services
Staff Contact:
Karen Bergsvik
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $667,714 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $$667,714
Total Project Budget: $ $667,714 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
There are changes to the 2010 Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG). The total allocation
is $432,491, which is an increase of $138,193 from prior estimates of the allocation. The majority of
the funds are being redirected to the Housing Repair Assistance Program.
Applications for the 2011/2012 were read and scored by the Human Services Advisory Committee. They
recommended that 35 programs be funded, at the current general fund level of $437,000. The General
Fund recommendations will be adopted as part of the City's budget process.
It is estimated that Renton will receive $529,521 in Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) for
2011. The CDBG funding recommendations must be adopted after a public hearing, separate from the
budget process. As a member of the KIng County Consortium, Renton must adopt the CDBG
recommendations to meet the deadlines set by King County. We are also required to adopt a
Contingency Plan to cover any changes in funding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the 2011/2012 CDBG funding as recommended by the Human Services Advisory Committee,
and adopt the proposed Contingency Plan.
7f. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
revised 2010 and the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Page 51 of 146
H:\Human Services\09\Budget\2010CDBG contract.doc
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:August 13, 2010
TO:Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
CC:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
FROM:Karen Bergsvik, Human Services Manager
SUBJECT:2010 CDBG Contract
Attached is the 2010 CDBG contract with King County. It is in the amount of $432,491,
which is an increase of $138,193 from prior estimates of the allocation.
Program Original 2010
Allocation
Revised 2010
Allocation
Explanation
Multi-Service
Center/Emergency
Assistance
$35,000 $38,719 Received more funds
than estimated;
distributed according
to the contingency
plan.
Institute for Family
Development/Parents
and Children Together
$12,298 $14,233 Received more funds
than estimated;
distributed according
to the contingency
plan.
Planning and
Administration
$47,000 $52,592 Received more funds
than estimated;
distributed according
to the contingency
plan.
Housing Repair
Assistance Program
(HRAP)
$200,000 $202,712
$86,930
$36,945
$326,587
The 2010 allocation
to HRAP is $202,712.
This is slightly more
than estimated.
The amount of
unallocated CDBG
funds that had been
reallocated to HRAP
in 2009 are equal to
$86,930. Funds in
the amount of $20,
693 were not spent
7f. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
revised 2010 and the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Page 52 of 146
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
Page 2 of 2
August 13, 2010
H:\Human Services\09\Budget\2010CDBG contract.doc
by HRAP in 2009 and
are being carried
forward.
Unallocated CDBG
funds in the amount
of $70,427 were
designated to go to
traffic signals – see
attachment. The
traffic signals cost
less than estimated,
and the $70,427 is no
longer needed;
therefore $36,945
was reallocated to
the HRAP program
and the remaining
balance is being held
in reserve, in case the
final invoice for the
traffic signals is more
than anticipated.
The plan is to put as much CDBG funds into HRAP as possible, in order to pay the salary
and benefit cost of the Facilities Technician in 2011.
The public hearing for the 2011 CDBG funding recommendations is to be held August 17,
2010. We plan to present to Council the 2011 funding recommendations and the
changes for 2010 (outlined above), at the same time. This is tentatively planned for the
September 13, 2010 meeting.
The $138,193 are unspent Capital funds from 2007-2009. They are not new funds. I have
spending authority for the funds, as they have been in the city budget in prior years.
They are funds that are being reallocated to the Housing Repair Assistance Program.
If you would like any further information, please contact me at X6650.
KB:ca
Attachment
7f. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
revised 2010 and the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Page 53 of 146
H:\Human Services\09\Legislative\10 Issue Papers\issuepaper1112 CDBG funding NO SPECIFICS(2).doc
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:August 30, 2010
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Renton City Councilmembers
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Karen Bergsvik, Human Services Manager, x6652
SUBJECT:Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Changes and Funding Recommendations for Human Services
2010 CDBG CHANGES:
CDBG allocations for 2010 were higher than originally estimated, resulting in a slight
increase to the three funded programs, the Housing Repair Assistance Program, the
Multi-Service Center, and Institute for Family Development. Unspent funds of $86,930
from the 2009 HRAP contract were included in the 2010 HRAP contract. CDBG funds of
$70,427 were originally designated for the Renton Traffic Pedestrian Signal Project. Due
to significant savings in materials costs, no CDBG funds were needed for project
completion, and the contract was cancelled. $36,945 of the funds were reallocated to
HRAP, with the remaining balance being held in reserve until the signal project is
complete. Those funds will then be reallocated to HRAP.
2011 CDBG ISSUES
1. Should the highest ranked applications by result for human services funding for
2011/2012 be funded?
2. Approve the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding
recommendations and Contingency Plan.
BACKGROUND
·Renton chose to participate with 16 others cities in an electronic application
administered by E-Gov Alliance. The process saved agencies time by having to
submit only one application to apply to any number of the participating cities,
which significantly increased the number of requests submitted.
·Two funding workshops were held for agencies in East and South King County
Extensive help was made available to agencies to complete the application-both
regionally and locally.
·Facing increased human services needs (requests of $1,177,560) and limited funds
7f. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
revised 2010 and the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Page 54 of 146
Don Persson, Council President
Renton City Councilmembers
Page 2 of 3
8/27/10
to allocate ($489,952), the Committee had to make some very difficult decisions in
a highly competitive funding cycle.
·Funding is allocated by Renton Result area. The nine areas are: 1)All children and
youth are ready for educational success, work and life 2)Individuals have adequate
clothing, food, housing and healthcare 3)All individuals become as self-sufficient
as possible 4)Residents know about domestic violence and how to keep safe 5)All
residents are proactive to issues of sexual assault and sexual violence 6)All
residents are healthy and safe 7)All residents identify with and contribute to their
community 8)End homelessness in Renton 9)Connect People to Services.
·Each Result has a specific dollar amount to allocate, based on the applications
received, historical funding levels, and input from the Human Services Advisory
Committee (HSAC). Two result areas received no applications.
·The HSAC used an open and transparent review process that was thorough and
equitable. Applications were read and scored by teams of Advisory Committee
members, using a rating tool developed by members and staff. Training was
provided on how to rate the applications, and each group was supported by a
team lead.
·Funding recommendations were based on the points each application received
from the scoring process. Applications in a result area were ranked from highest to
lowest based on the average score of the HSAC raters. Staff rated the accuracy of
the financial tables included in the applications, using criteria established by the
Human Services Advisory Committee. Currently funded agencies were eligible for
five bonus points for meeting contract goals, and submitting reports on time.
·HSAC members divided into four groups, to review all the applications in their
assigned result areas. Each group read, rated and made funding recommendations
for their results. Funding recommendations by the four groups were reviewed,
discussed, and adopted by entire HSAC.
·HSAC decided that each result would receive funding, and that the top ranked
program within each result would be funded, at a minimum, to its 2010 funding
level. Programs were funded in the order they were ranked, and programs could
not be skipped to fund a lower ranked program.
·The programs recommended for CDBG funding were determined by staff after the
HSAC made their funding recommendations.
·It is estimated that Renton will receive $529,521 in Community Development Block
Grants for 2011:
v $52,952 for Public Services; and $52,952 in Planning and Administration;
v $201,218 in Capital funds, of which the Housing Repair Assistance
Program will receive $200,000;
v The remainder is for the Housing Stability Program, deferred home loan
program, and the County administrative costs. This is a requirement of
our contract.
7f. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
revised 2010 and the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Page 55 of 146
Don Persson, Council President
Renton City Councilmembers
Page 3 of 3
8/27/10
·A public hearing for CDBG funding recommendations only was held at the Human
Services Advisory Committee meeting on August 17, 2010. No comments were
received.
·CDBG Public Services funding is recommended for two years, with the second year
dependent upon funding and performance. It is recommended that the Institute
for Family Development and the Multi-Service Center be funded.
·It is estimated that the City will receive $201,218 in capital funding. Because the
city’s Housing Repair Program is recommended for $200,000, it was decided not to
seek additional requests for capital funding for 2011.
·King County requires a contingency plan in case CDBG funding differs from the
original estimate. The contingency plan is attached.
·General Fund funding recommendations are attached as an informational item
only. The recommendations will be adopted through the budget process.
Agencies wishing to give public input may do so at the public hearings held during
the budget process.
LONG-TERM RESPONSE
The Human Services Advisory Committee will continue to refine the funding process
following the first fully electronic process. Two places to make improvements are: 1) the
online electronic application working with E-Gov Alliance and the other cities; and 2) the
local process, rating tool and results. A survey will be done of the agencies that applied
for funding to measure satisfaction with the process and to get input on how it can be
improved.
CONCLUSION
Human Services funds are allocated by clearly defined, equitable process. At the current
level of funding, the top rated applications are recommended for General Fund and
CDBG public services funding. Out of the estimated CDBG Capital funding, $200,000 will
be allocated to the City of Renton Housing Repair Assistance Program. The estimated
amount Renton will receive for Planning and Administration is $52,952. This is applied to
the cost of the CDBG contract specialist’s salary and benefits.
Attachments
cc:Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
7f. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
revised 2010 and the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Page 56 of 146
7f. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
revised 2010 and the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Page 57 of 146
H:\Human Services\09\Legislative\10 Issue Papers\2011-2012 CDBG Contingency Plan final.doc
CITY OF RENTON
2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Contingency Plan for Funding
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funding
Public Services Programs
Increase in CDBG Public Services:
·Increase will be applied proportionately to the Institute for Family Development and the
Multi-Service Center.
Decrease in CDBG Public Services:
·Decrease funding will be applied proportionately to the Institute for Family Development and
the Multi-Service Center.
Capital Projects
Increase in capital funding:
·Additional funds to Renton Unallocated Fund.
Decrease in capital funding:
·Decrease Renton Housing Repair Assistance Program.
Planning and Administration
Planning and Administration covers administrative costs for Renton’s CDBG program. CDBG covers
approximately 56% of the salary and benefit costs of the Contract Specialist and the General Fund
the remaining 44%.
Increase in funding
·Increase Planning and Administration to cover CDBG administrative activities and additional
planning activities which might include developing a Consolidated Plan, needs assessments or
capacity building.
Decrease in funding
·Decrease funding first to additional planning activities, and then to CDBG administrative and
planning activities.
7f. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
revised 2010 and the 2011/2012 Community Development Block Grant Page 58 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2011-2012 General Fund Human Services Funding
Recommendations
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Draft 2011 Agency Funding
2011-2012 Gen Fd Contingency Plan
Application Rating Tool
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community Services
Staff Contact:
Karen Bergsvik
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $437,000 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $437,000 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ $437,000 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Applications for the 2011/2012 funding allocations were read and scored by the Human Services
Advisory Committee. They recommended that 35 programs be funded at the current general fund level
of $437,000. The General Fund recommendations are informational only, and will be adopted as part of
the City's budget process. A contingency plan for increased funding or a decrease in funding is also
included. There will be two public hearings for the budget, and agencies will be invited to give
comments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Include the 2011/2012 general fund human services funding recommendations and contingency plan as
part of the 2011-2012 City budget.
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 59 of 146
h:\human services\09\legislative\10 issue papers\issuepaper1112cdbg funding no specifics91310ca.doc
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:September 13, 2010
TO:Don Persson, Council President, and Renton City Councilmembers
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Karen Bergsvik, Human Services Manager, X6652
SUBJECT:2011-2012 General Fund Human Services Funding
Recommendations
2011/2012 ISSUES
1.Should the highest ranked applications by result for human services funding for
2011/2012 be funded?
2.During the budget process, approve the 2011/2012 General Fund Human
Services funding recommendations and Contingency Plan.
BACKGROUND
·Renton chose to participate with 16 other cities in an electronic application
administered by E-Gov Alliance. The process saved agencies time by having to
submit only one application to apply to any number of the participating cities,
which significantly increased the number of requests submitted.
·Two funding workshops were held for agencies in East and South King County.
Extensive help was made available to agencies to complete the application-both
regionally and locally.
·Facing increased human services needs (requests of $1,177,560) and limited
funds to allocate ($489,952 total, of which $437,000 is the general fund, and
$52,592 is Community Development Block Grant Public Services), the Committee
had to make some very difficult decisions in a highly competitive funding cycle.
·Funding is allocated by Renton Result area. The nine areas are: 1) All children
and youth are ready for educational success, work and life; 2) Individuals have
adequate clothing, food, housing and healthcare; 3) All individuals become as
self-sufficient as possible; 4) Residents know about domestic violence and how to
keep safe; 5) All residents are proactive to issues of sexual assault and sexual
violence; 6) All residents are healthy and safe; 7) All residents identify with and
contribute to their community; 8) End homelessness in Renton; and 9) Connect
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 60 of 146
Don Persson, Council President
Renton City Councilmembers
Page 2 of 3
September 13, 2010
h:\human services\09\legislative\10 issue papers\issuepaper1112cdbg funding no specifics91310ca.doc
people to services.
·Each Result has a specific dollar amount to allocate, based on a percentage of the
total amount of funds available to allocate. The percentage is based on the
applications received, historical funding levels, and input from the Human
Services Advisory Committee (HSAC). Two result areas received no applications.
·The HSAC used a transparent review process that was thorough and equitable.
Applications were read and scored by teams of Advisory Committee members,
using a rating tool developed by members and staff. Training was provided on
how to rate the applications, and each group was supported by a team lead.
·Funding recommendations were based on the points each application received
from the scoring process. Applications in a result area ranked from highest to
lowest based on the average score of the HSAC raters. Staff rated the accuracy
of the financial tables included in the applications, using criteria established by
the Human Services Advisory Committee. Currently funded agencies were
eligible for five bonus points for meeting contract goals, and submitting reports
on time.
·HSAC members divided into four groups to review all the applications in their
assigned result areas. Each group read, rated, and made funding
recommendations for their results. Funding recommendations by the four
groups were reviewed, discussed, and adopted by the entire HSAC.
·HSAC decided that each result would receive funding, and that the top ranked
program within each result would be funded, at a minimum, to its 2010 funding
level. Programs were funded in the order they were ranked, and programs could
not be skipped to fund a lower ranked program.
·The Contingency Plan for additional funds for a decrease in funding is attached.
·General Fund funding recommendations are an informational item only. The
recommendations will be adopted through the budget process. Agencies wishing
to give public input may do so at the public hearings held during the budget
process.
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 61 of 146
Don Persson, Council President
Renton City Councilmembers
Page 3 of 3
September 13, 2010
h:\human services\09\legislative\10 issue papers\issuepaper1112cdbg funding no specifics91310ca.doc
LONG-TERM RESPONSE
The Human Services Advisory Committee will continue to refine the funding process
following the first fully electronic process. Two places to make improvements are: 1)
the online electronic application working with E-Gov Alliance and the other cities; and 2)
the local process, rating tool, and results. A survey will be done of the agencies that
applied for funding to measure satisfaction with the process and to get input on how it
can be improved.
CONCLUSION
Human Services funds are allocated by a clearly defined, equitable process. At the
current level of funding, the top rated applications are recommended for General Fund
and CDBG public services funding.
Attachments
cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 62 of 146
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 63 of 146
C:\Documents and Settings\callread\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\1XK1LO1F\2011-2012
General fund contingency plan.doc
CITY OF RENTON
2011/2012 General Fund Contingency Plan for Funding
General Fund
Increase in the general fund allocation:
Additional funds will be distributed by the same percentages per result area as the initial funds:
Result One: 19.78%
Result Two: 17.08%
Result Three: 8.32%
Result Four: 8.58%
Result Five: 6.38%
Result Eight: 29.87%
Result Nine: 10%
Each team that was assigned to each result area will decide how to distribute the funds within their result area. If a
result area receives more than $5,000 (the minimum level of funding), the team can choose to fund a new program.
Decrease in general fund allocation:
A decrease in funding will be applied to each result area by the same percentages as above. Each team that was assigned
to each result area will decide how to cut funds within their result area. No program will be cut below $5000 (the
minimum level of funding).
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 64 of 146
CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION RATING TOOL
__________
__________
POINT ALLOCATION
High (5):
Moderate (3):
Low (1):
Incomplete (0):
SUMMARY OF SCORES
/ 50
/ 30
/ 15
/ 5
/ 100
The answer does not adequately address a number of the key points.
The answer does not address the question.
Comments:
Performance History
Need:
Outputs/Outcomes:
Financial:
TOTAL:
The answer addresses all elements listed with responses that are complete and relevant.
The answer addresses: 1) Most but not all elements listed, OR 2) All elements listed but answers are not as complete and
relevant as other responses.
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 65 of 146
CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION RATING TOOL
Corresponding
Application
Question
High
(5)
Moderate
(3)
Low
(1)
Incomplete
(0)
D1
D2a
D2b
D2c
D2d
D3, D4
A1a-d
A1e-f
A2, A3
C1a
Corresponding
Application
Question
High
(5)
Moderate
(3)
Low
(1)
Incomplete
(0)
SU1-3
SU1-3, OP1-2
OP3
OT1
OT2
OT3
Program does not duplicate existing services to Renton residents, or
describes how the program differs in service delivery to the target
population.
Provides a clear description of the problem and recent regional or sub-
regional data.
The program addresses the identified need(s) and is fully described.
The core components of the program are clearly defined and relevent to
the exisiting need(s) and include any best or promising practices being
The target population is clearly identified including demographic and
geographic details and relevent to the existing need(s).
The capacity and strategies for providing immediately available services are
clearly defined and relavent to the need.
Subtotals:TOTAL OUTPUT/OUTCOMES SCORE:
OUTPUTS/OUTCOMES (30 points)
TOTAL NEED SCORE:
The capacity and strategies to serve individuals with cultural barriers
(including language, literacy, or background) is clearly defined and relevent
to the need.
Subtotals:
Clearly demonstrates the agency is able to successfully manage the
program, and the proper staff is in place.
Accessibility (15/55 points)
Describes how the program is accessible in terms of location, affordability,
physical accessibility and communications for persons with disabilities and
limited English speakers, and is relevent to the need.
Service Units & Outputs (15/30 points)
Coordination (5/50 points)
NEED (50 points)
Description (30/55 points)
How and when the services are provided are clearly defined and relevent
to the identified target population.
Outcomes (15/30 points)
Effectiveness of the program is measurable and clearly defined.
The desired timeframe for results is measurable, clearly defined and in line
with the program's desired outcomes.
Proposed 2011 outcomes are measurable and clearly defined.
Service units are well defined and relavent to the proposed program (e.g.
Crisis lines measure number of calls, food banks measure bags of food
provided). Significant changes in service units were explained if applicable.
Cost per unit of services is reasonable/consistent for the types of services
(taking into account the intensity and durations of program and the clients'
needs).
2011/2012 service estimates are clearly defined, correlate to the requested
funding, and are in-line with service costs for other cities.
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 66 of 146
CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION RATING TOOL
FINANCIAL (15 points) /Performance History (5 points) completed by staff
7g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of the
2011/2012 General Fund Human Services funding allocation
Page 67 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
King County Metro Transit
Transit Now Service Partnership
Route 110 Agreement Addendum
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Contract
Resolution
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Nathan Jones, Planning Section (extension 7217)
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure
Required: $
$ 199,743.57/year beginning in
2013 Transfer Amendment: $0
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $0
Total Project Budget:
$ City Share Total
Project: $
$ 998,717.85 (5-year
total)
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
In 2008, Renton signed a five-year agreement CAG-08-194 with King County Metro Transit to provide
funding for enhanced service and routing on Metro Route 110.
With projected declines in City revenues, and despite potential benefits of increased service, in
September 2009 City Council authorized the Mayor to send a letter to King County notifying Metro of the
City’s intent to terminate financial support of the Transit Now Route 110 partnership.
Subsequent communication with King County Metro Transit staff indicated it is possible to delay the
implementation of this route until 2013, when potential City revenues may have rebounded.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution which rescinds the September 14, 2009, termination of CAG-08-194 and authorizes
the Mayor to sign an addendum for the Metro Route 110 Transit Now agreement delaying service
implementation to 2013.
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 68 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 69 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 70 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 71 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 72 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 73 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 74 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 75 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 76 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 77 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 78 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 79 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 80 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 81 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 82 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 83 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 84 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 85 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 86 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 87 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 88 of 146
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 89 of 146
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RESCINDING THE
TERMINATION OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY METRO
TRANSIT REGARDING THE KING COUNTY METRO ROUTE 110 PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO
AN ADDENDUM TO THE AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2008, the City Council passed Resolution No. 3987,
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with King County
Metro Transit regarding the King County Metro Route 110 Partnership Agreement (the
"Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2009, the City Council approved the Transportation
Systems Division request to terminate the Agreement in light of budget shortfalls for 2009 and
2010; and
WHEREAS, in later discussions, King County and the City agreed to push back
implementation ofthis Agreement to a date in the future beyond the original implementation
date of September 2010; and
WHEREAS, as the City Council had already approved termination of the Agreement, the
implementation date could not be amended unless the termination was rescinded;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The City Council hereby rescinds the termination of the Agreement.
SECTION III. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an
amendment to the Agreement for the purpose of changing the implementation date.
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 90 of 146
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1479:9/2/10:scr
7h. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends rescinding the
termination of CAG‐08‐194, with King County Transit, and approval of an Page 91 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
126th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special
Assessment District No. 0045
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Ordinance
Draft Final Notice of Potential Assessment
Final Assessment District Roll
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Michael Benoit, Wastewater Engineering, x7206
Recommended Action:
Refer to Utilities Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Wastewater Utility has completed construction of the 126th Avenue SE Utility project, a portion of
which included the 126th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension. At the regular Council meeting on
October 26, 2009, Council approved the preliminary Special Assessment District. The final costs and
assessments have been determined, and the property owners will be notified, as directed by City Code.
There are potentially 40 single-family units within the Special Assessment District.
The per unit assessment for the district is $8,686.39. Thirty days after final approval of the ordinance,
interest will accrue on the assessments at a rate of 1.33 percent for a period of 10 years, per City Code.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the final 126th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District No. 0045 and
present the ordinance for first reading.
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 92 of 146
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:September 7, 2010
TO:Don Persson, President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Michael Benoit, Wastewater Utility, ext 7206
SUBJECT:Establishment of 126th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension
Special Assessment District No. 0045
ISSUE:
Does the City wish to establish a Special Assessment District for the 126th Avenue SE
Sanitary Sewer Extension in order to ensure that the cost of the project is equitably
distributed to those who benefit?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the final 126th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District
No. 0045 and present the ordinance for first reading.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The 126th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension will provide sanitary sewer service to
properties adjacent to 126thth Avenue SE between SE 100th Street and SE 104th Street.
The Wastewater Utility has proposed to use a per-connection method of calculating the
assessments for the properties within the proposed assessment district. This method
divides the cost of the project by the number of potential lots within the assessment
district.
The total final cost of the project was $347,455.53. There are 40 projected lots within
the proposed assessment district boundary. Therefore, the per connection cost is
proposed to be $8,686.39 per unit.
The cost estimate as provided for the preliminary approval of the assessment district by
Council on October 26, 2009 and shown in the preliminary notice sent out to the
property owners was $10,979.09 per unit. The lower final cost was due to favorable
construction bids leading to a lower construction cost.
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 93 of 146
Mr. Persson, Council President
Page 2 of 2
September 7, 2010
H:\File Sys\WWP - Wastewater\WWP-27-3514 126th Ave SE Sewer Extension\SAD\Final
SAD\Final_SAD_Issue_126th.Doc\MABtp
Thirty days after final approval of the ordinance, interest will accrue on the assessments
at a rate of 1.33 percent for a period of 10 years, per City Code.
CONCLUSION:
It has been the policy of the City that when sanitary sewer facilities have been installed
that the City hold a Special Assessment District in order to ensure each property that
benefits from the new facility pays its fair share of the costs. This policy helps ensure
the existing ratepayers do not pay a disproportionate share of the costs for these
City-installed facilities.
Therefore, we recommend that Council approve staff’s recommendation for the
establishment of the 126th Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment
District No. 0045.
cc:Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
Dave Christensen, Wastewater Engineering Supervisor
JoAnn Wykpisz, PW Principal Financial & Administrative Analyst
File
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 94 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 95 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 96 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 97 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 98 of 146
H:\File Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-3514 126th Ave SE Sewer Extension\SAD\Final SAD\Final_notice_126TH.doc\MABtp
CITY OF RENTON
FINAL NOTICE OF POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT
for City of Renton 126TH Avenue SE Sanitary Sewer Extension
Special Assessment District No. 0045
Date Mailed: October XX, 2010
Per Unit Assessment
$8,686.39
Name
Street Address
City, State Zip
King County Account No.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
On November 6, 2009, I, Bonnie I. Walton, the City Clerk of Renton, Washington, mailed you a notice
of potential assessment for sanitary sewer improvements associated with the 126th Avenue SE
Sanitary Sewer Extension. We have now completed construction of these sewer facilities. The
facilities, as shown on the attached map, are eligible for cost recovery under City Special Assessment
District Ordinance No. 4444.
For those properties that could receive benefit directly by the sewers, future use would trigger
payment of a 'fair share' cost of the sewer. This assessment is calculated, as a unit charge, by dividing
the cost of the sewer extension by the number of units projected for the basin served by these
sewers. This rate has been established at $8,686.39 per unit.
The purpose of the assessment district is to allow the City the ability to collect the costs of the
construction of the sewer facilities from all those who benefit from its construction. To accomplish
this, we are required to record an ordinance which will serve as a notice of potential assessment.
This ordinance will establish a boundary that includes any parcel that may benefit in the future. It is
our goal to ensure, in fairness to all, that any property owner that connects at a later date pays their
share just like those who will connect right away. The benefit area is defined as the ultimate service
area that the facility may be able to serve. This boundary is shown on the attached map.
You will only be required to pay this assessment when the property gains benefit from these sewer
facilities. Until that time, the property can be sold or change hands without triggering the
assessment. Benefit from these sewer facilities can be described as follows:
·A property not currently connected to a City sewer facility (i.e., currently utilizing an on-site
system or a vacant parcel), that connects to the sewer system associated with this district will
trigger the assessment. Until then, the assessment will not be triggered.
·For those properties that are already connected to City sewer, this assessment will only be
triggered if the property increases its density either by change of use (i.e., single family to
multi-family housing) or through increased density within the same use (i.e., further subdivision
of land for single family housing).
You will not be required to pay the assessment unless one of the above situations occurs. However,
the assessment district will accrue simple interest at a rate of 1.33% per annum for a period of ten
years. The accrual of interest will begin thirty (30) days after the notice of potential assessment is
recorded with King County Records. To avoid interest charges at a future date, you may pay the
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 99 of 146
H:\File Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-3514 126th Ave SE Sewer Extension\SAD\Final SAD\Final_notice_126TH.doc\MABtp
amount of assessment during the thirty-day period after recording, interest free. This option is
totally at the discretion of the property owner.
Some properties within the boundary of this special assessment district are currently within other
city held special assessment districts. Each property will only be responsible to pay the charges for
the special assessment districts that they derive benefit from.
Per City Ordinance No. 4444 you may request an appeal hearing by writing to the Renton City
Council, c/o City Clerk, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, within twenty (20) days of this mailing
(by October XX, 2010, 5:00 P.M.).
Grounds for protest:
An appeal shall include a statement of claimed errors that concern the proposed
assessment and must be accompanied by a $75.00 non-refundable fee. Errors which are
not set forth in writing will not be considered. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 4444,
Sections 9-16-9.C and D, the only items of appeal that will be considered are the cost of
the facilities, the costs distribution methodology, and the issue of benefit to the
properties to be assessed
Appeal Fee and Appeal Process:
A non-refundable appeal fee in the amount of $75.00 shall be submitted with each
appeal. If a protest is received and deemed timely and establishes proper grounds for
protest according to City Ordinance, a public hearing will be held. If no protests are
received, the above-quoted notice of potential assessment will be recorded against your
property. The charge(s) will not be collected until you subsequently tap onto or use the
facilities covered by the Special Assessment District notice.
We hope that this notice will answer most of your questions. If you do, however, have questions
pertaining to sewer installations, the background of the assessment district, or the appeal process,
please contacts Michael Benoit (primary) at 425-430-7206 or Dave Christensen (secondary) at
425-430-7212.
________________________________
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
Notice of Final Assessment/Final Hearing
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 100 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 101 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 102 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 103 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 104 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 105 of 146
7i. ‐ Utility Systems Division requests authorization to finalize the 126th
Ave. SE Sanitary Sewer Extension Special Assessment District in the Page 106 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2011 and 2012 Utility Revenue Requirements and
Rates
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
2011 Utility Rate Comparison
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director, x7239
Recommended Action:
Refer to Committee of the Whole
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment:
$
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $Water $2,012,487 (2011),
$2,117,208 (2012)
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total
Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Using the utility rate model and the new financial criteria, staff determined the utility revenue
requirements for 2011 and 2012. The primary factors that are driving the need for a revenue increase
include meeting the financial polices – covering debt, system reinvestment, reserves and rate
stabilization, and maintaining sustainable fund balances. The recommended revenue increases for 2011
are 18 percent for water, 42 percent for wastewater, 40 percent for surface water, and no increase for
solid waste. The recommended revenue increases for 2012 are 16 percent for water, 5 percent for
wastewater, 11 percent for surface water, and no increase for solid waste.
Implementing the proposed 2011 and 2012 rates will allow the utilities to provide the minimum required
maintenance, compliance with minimum regulatory requirements and meet minimum financial policies
and fund balances.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the proposed rate increases as outlined in the attached issue paper and direct staff to prepare
appropriate legislation.
7j. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits proposed changes to the water,
wastewater, and surface water utility rates. Refer to Committee of the Page 107 of 146
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:September 8, 2010
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director, x 7239
SUBJECT:2011 and 2012 Utility Revenue Requirements and Rates
ISSUE:
Should Council approve the proposed 2011 and 2012 utility revenue increases?
RECOMMENDATION:
·Approve the proposed 2011 revenue increases of 18 percent for water,
42 percent for wastewater, 40 percent for surface water and no increase for solid
waste.
·Approve the proposed 2012 revenue increases of 16 percent for water,
5 percent for wastewater, 11 percent for surface water and no increase for solid
waste.
·Maintain the current $1.16 King County rate stabilization charge for both 2011
and 2012.
·Direct staff to prepare the ordinances allowing the City to charge the 2011 utility
rates beginning January 1, 2011, and to charge the 2012 utility rates beginning
January 1, 2012.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
Over the past 15 years, City utilities have placed a high priority on accommodating
growth and economic development, while keeping rates low. This is in accordance with
the City’s Six-Year Business Plan. This approach has resulted in significant benefits to the
City. Utility funded capital improvement projects to increase system capacity and
accommodate growth and development have supported such projects as The Landing,
Harrington Square, Seahawks facility and downtown development. These
improvements will continue to support significant future development including Hawk’s
Landing, Highlands Area, and further redevelopment downtown. While the City utilities
were completing these projects and keeping rates and fees low (and waiving fees in
some cases), our composite utility rates became the lowest among all neighboring utility
7j. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits proposed changes to the water,
wastewater, and surface water utility rates. Refer to Committee of the Page 108 of 146
Mr. Don Persson, Council President
Page 2 of 3
September 8, 2010
\\RVFPS-02\Depts\PW\File Sys\USA - Utility Systems Division Administration\USA-03 - CORRESPONDENCE\USA-03 -
0001 Utility Director's Correspondence\2011 Budget\2011 2012 Rates Issue Paper.doc\LLHtp
providers. Over the years, this approach has resulted in some negative consequences
for the utilities. Projects to accommodate development and growth have been
prioritized over projects to maintain existing infrastructure. In some cases, systems have
started to deteriorate and fail (Earlington, Cascade Interceptor, and President Park). Our
approach of prioritizing development projects, and keeping rates and fees low, has
caused the utilities to rely more heavily on bonds over rate revenue and made it difficult
to maintain necessary reserves and fund balances. Compounding these financial
challenges, revenues have dropped due to the weak economy and conservation efforts.
These factors have combined over time to place the utilities in a vulnerable financial
condition.
Earlier this year, Council adopted financial criteria to stabilize the utility funds and
directed that the criteria be implemented over a five-year period starting in 2011. The
financial criteria include:
·Fund Balance, Operating Reserves, and Rate Stabilization:
o Water, Wastewater and Surface Water Funds: 12% of annual
operating expenses or 30 to 45 days
o Solid Waste: $400,000
o King County Wastewater Treatment: $380,000
·Capital Contingency as System Reinvestment and Debt Service:
o Surface Water: 1.25 debt service coverage (DSC) and
approximately $3 million annual system reinvestment
o Wastewater: 1.25 DSC and approximately $3 million annual
system reinvestment
o Water: 1.25 DSC and approximately $4 million annual system
reinvestment
Bonds versus Cash Funded Projects
·All non-CIP projects should be paid for using rates (programs, system plans,
education materials, etc.).
·All system reinvestment, maintenance, replacement and rehabilitation CIPs
should be paid for using rates.
·CIPs for new infrastructure, growth, or increased capacity can be paid for
using bonds.
Piped Utilities Rate Modeling
To meet the financial criteria in five years and minimize rate increases in 2011 and 2012,
additional system reinvestment funding was phased-in starting in 2013. The Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) was kept as low as possible in 2011 and 2012, and
moderate bonding was used in 2011 and 2012 in the wastewater utility modeling to
smooth rates over the transition period. The proposed five-year revenue needs forecast
below meets the financial criteria by the 2016 budget year if revenue increases are
approved for the 2011 through 2015 period.
7j. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits proposed changes to the water,
wastewater, and surface water utility rates. Refer to Committee of the Page 109 of 146
Mr. Don Persson, Council President
Page 3 of 3
September 8, 2010
\\RVFPS-02\Depts\PW\File Sys\USA - Utility Systems Division Administration\USA-03 - CORRESPONDENCE\USA-03 -
0001 Utility Director's Correspondence\2011 Budget\2011 2012 Rates Issue Paper.doc\LLHtp
Increase on Average Monthly Single-Family Bill
Utility 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Water
% increase
$4.63
18%
$4.85
16%
$2.11
6%
$2.24
6%
$2.37
6%
Wastewater
% increase
$7.06
42%
$1.20
5%
$1.25
5%
$1.32
5%
$1.38
5%
Surface Water
% increase
$2.96
40%
$1.14
11%
$0.58
5%
$0.60
5%
$0.63
5%
Solid Waste
% increase
$0
0%
$0
0%
$0
0%
$0
0%
$0
0%
Total Proposed
Increase/mo
$14.65 $7.19 $3.94 $4.16 $4.38
Average Monthly Single-Family Bill with Proposed Increases
Utility 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Water $30.34 $35.19 $37.30 $39.54 $41.91
Wastewater $23.88 $25.08 $26.33 $27.65 $29.03
Surface Water $10.37 $11.51 $12.09 $12.69 $13.32
Solid Waste $19.15 $19.15 $19.15 $19.15 $19.15
Total $83.74 $90.93 $94.87 $99.03 $103.41
The average single-family monthly utility bill is $83.74 for 2011 and $90.93 for 2012. Of
the nine cities that we use for rate comparisons, only two may have lower rates than
Renton in 2011 and 2012. Renton continues to have utility rates in the lowest quarter
for the entire region.
CONCLUSION:
Implementing the proposed 2011 and 2012 revenue increases will allow the utilities to
balance debt with cash financing, invest in existing infrastructure to prevent
deterioration, failure and/or lapse in service, build adequate fund balance for
sustainability, phase in meeting the financial policies, and meet minimum regulatory
compliance.
cc: JoAnn Wykpisz, PW Prin & Fin Admin Analyst
Iwen Wang, FIT Administrator
File
7j. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits proposed changes to the water,
wastewater, and surface water utility rates. Refer to Committee of the Page 110 of 146
RANK CITY/ DISTRICT (Solid Waste Provider)TOTAL WATER
WASTE
WATER
Sewer
SURFACE
WATER
Storm
SOLID
WASTE
Garbage
1 *Seattle 116.81 40.76 34.78 8.58 32.70
2 Kirkland (WM)109.61 37.20 26.08 14.86 31.47
3 Coal Creek Utility District (WM)104.24 38.35 17.06 16.62 32.21
4 *Bellevue (A)102.80 37.04 29.71 17.26 18.79
5 *Cedar River Water/Sewer District (A)94.01 32.64 19.55 16.29 25.53
6 Kent (A)91.19 36.75 12.99 * 11.57 29.88 *
7 *Redmond (WM)87.52 45.80 12.32 16.56 12.84
8 Issaquah (WM & A) 69.06 36.98 18.01 14.08 18.07 *
9 RENTON (WM) 83.74 30.34 23.88 10.37 19.15
10 Tukwila (A - SEATAC DISP) 80.77 34.85 15.40 7.79 22.73
11 Auburn (WM, A)78.81 26.06 13.36 14.18 25.21
2011 Utility Rate Comparison With Surrounding Jurisdictions
Average Monthly Bill for a Single Family Household
DRAFT
* 2010 Rates, 2011 Proposed rate increases are unavailable at this time.
Notes:
The Water and Sewer Districts of Cedar River and Coal Creek provide water and wastewater services only. Surface water is
billed by King County.
Water: Rates were based on bimonthly consumption of 1,500 cubic feet of water (Seniors 900 cf) . Seattle, Kent, and Tukwila
have different water rates in the summer (June -September); the average monthly rates for summer and non-summer months
were weighted.
Wastewater:Rates for Bellevue, Issaquah, and Seattle were based on a volume of 750 cubic feet per month. All other
districts are on a fixed monthly charge. Rates do not include the King County Wastewater Treatment charge.
Surface Water: Bellevue's rate is an average rate based on a 10,000 -12,000 sq. ft. lot area (between 20% and 40%
developed). Kent's rate depends on the drainage basin affected, ranging from $2.67 to $7.62 per month; for comparison
purposes, rates were averaged.
Solid Waste: The name of the hauler is noted after the jurisdiction name: "WM" represents Waste Management, "A"
represents Allied Waste Services. For comparison purposes, rates include a 32-gallon garbage can, recycling, yard waste
collection, and an $0.80/month hazardous waste fee. Seattle and Renton do not charge a hazardous waste fee. Coal Creek
and Issaquah use two hauling companies to collect garbage; for comparison purposes, the jurisdiction's two rates were
averaged.
\\RVFPS-02\Depts\PW\File Sys\USA - Utility Systems Division Administration\USA-03 - CORRESPONDENCE\USA-03 - 0001 Utility Director's
Correspondence\2011 Budget\2011 Utility Rate Comparison.xls RATES 09/13/2010
7j. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits proposed changes to the water,
wastewater, and surface water utility rates. Refer to Committee of the Page 111 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Residential Plat Stormwater
Management Facility Maintenance
and Operation Policy
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ron Straka,Surface Water Utility Supervisor, x7248, Steve Lee,
Surface Water Engineer, x7205
Recommended Action:
Refer to Committee of the Whole
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 715,950/year Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City needs to establish a uniform and equitable policy for maintaining stormwater management
facilities in single-family residential plats with public streets. The City currently requires homeowner
associations to own and maintain stormwater flow control and water quality treatment facilities in
single-family residential plats, even though these facilities manage runoff from public streets. However,
when the City annexes areas from King County, the City is required to assume maintenance of
stormwater management facilities in the newly annexed areas because King County owns and
maintains stormwater facilities in plats with public streets. The Surface Water Utility currently
maintains 100 stormwater facilities in plats. There are an additional 213 facilities that are privately
maintained by homeowner associations in single-family residential plats that manage runoff from public
streets. Because these facilities manage runoff from public right-of-way, the City should maintain these
facilities. The proper maintenance of these facilities is also needed to minimize maintenance and
capital improvements costs to the City, to meet regulatory requirements related to the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, to protect public safety,
to prevent damage to property, and to protect environmental resources. Prior to the City assuming
maintenance of existing stormwater facilities, the facilities would need to meet City maintenance
standards. The total additional revenue increase needed to fund the program would be about $13 per
year for a typical homeowner, based upon 2010 Surface Water Utility revenues. That amount could be
reduced if proposed revenue increases are approved as part of the 2011-2012 budget process and if the
Fairwood Annexation is approved.
The hiring of the maintenance staff and budgeting for the purchase and rental of equipment would be
phased in between 2012 and 2013, depending upon how rapidly facilities are transferred from
homeowner associations to the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Assume maintenance and operation of all stormwater facilities in single-family residential plats with
public streets.
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 112 of 146
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 113 of 146
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 114 of 146
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 115 of 146
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 116 of 146
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 117 of 146
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 118 of 146
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 119 of 146
7k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends assuming maintenance and
operation of all stormwater facilities in single‐family residential plats Page 120 of 146
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
FY-2011 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant
Ecology Grant Agreement No. G1100089
Meeting:
Regular Council - 20 Sep 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Grant Agreement No. G1100089
Signature Authorization Form for Grant/Loan
Recipients
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor, x7248
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 297,940 (2010/2012) Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $297,940 (2010/2012)
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ 0
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City of Renton is eligible to receive $297,940 in non-matching grant funding between 2010 and
2012 from the Washington State Department of Ecology. This grant will assist the Surface Water Utility
and the City to implement the requirements associated with the new NPDES Phase II Municipal
Stormwater permit. Surface water activities eligible for this grant funding include the illicit discharge,
detection and elimination program, storm system mapping, and municipal operations pollution
prevention activities, flow control facilities inspections, public education program, and a monitoring
plan. This grant does not require the local government to match and is 100 percent funded by the
Washington State Department of Ecology with the effective date of the grant funds provided from July 1,
2010 to June 30, 2012 per the agreement.
The amendments to the Surface Water Utility 407 and 427 fund revenue and expenditure budgets for
the Ecology FY-2011 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant funding will be included in the City’s
quarterly budget amendment ordinance, which is prepared by the Finance Division.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Ecology Grant Agreement No. G1100089
and the “Signature Authorization Form for Grant/Loan Recipients.”
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 121 of 146
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:September 7, 2010
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor, x7248
SUBJECT:FY-2011 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant
Ecology Grant Agreement No. G1100089
ISSUE:
Should the City of Renton enter into a grant agreement with the Washington State Department
of Ecology for non-matching grant funds to be used by the City to assist with implementing the
Phase II Municipal Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Ecology Grant Agreement
No. G1100089 and the “Signature Authorization Form for Grant/Loan Recipients.” The
amendments to the Surface Water Utility 407 and 427 fund revenue and expenditure budgets
for the Ecology FY-2011 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant funding will be included in the
City’s quarterly budget amendment ordinance, which is prepared by the Finance Division.
BACKGROUND:
This grant will assist the Surface Water Utility and the City to implement the requirements
associated with the new NPDES Phase II Municipal Stormwater permit. Surface water activities
eligible for this grant funding include the implementation of the illicit discharge, detection and
elimination program, and municipal operations pollution prevention activities, flow control
facilities inspections, public education program, storm system mapping, and a monitoring plan.
This grant does not require the local government to match and is 100 percent funded by the
Washington State Department of Ecology with the effective date of the grant funds provided
from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2012 per the agreement. The amendments to the Surface Water
Utility 407 and 427 fund revenue and expenditure budgets for the Ecology FY-2011 Municipal
Stormwater Capacity Grant funding will be included in the City’s quarterly budget amendment
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 122 of 146
Mr. Don Persson, Council President
Page 2 of 2
September 7, 2010
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3058 2003 NPDES Phase II Permit\5000
Grants\FY2011 Muni SW Capacity Grant\Grant Authorization\Issue Paper - FY2011 Capacity Grant.doc\EMtp
ordinance, which is prepared by the Finance Division.
CONCLUSION:
The non-matching grant with the Washington State Department of Ecology, in the amount of up
to $297,940, would assist the City in complying with the federal NPDES permit.
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utilities System Director
Edward Mulhern, Surface Water Utility Engineer
JoAnn Wykpisz, PW Principal Admin and Fin Analyst
File
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 123 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 124 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 125 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 126 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 127 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 128 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 129 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 130 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 131 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 132 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 133 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 134 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 135 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 136 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 137 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 138 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 139 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 140 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 141 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 142 of 146
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 143 of 146
SIGNATURE AUTHORIZATION FORM
FOR GRANT/LOAN RECIPIENTS
Department of Ecology
Water Quality Program
PO Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
Phone: (360) 407-6600
FAX: (360) 407-7151
Name of Organization Date Submitted
City of Renton
Project Title Agreement Number
FY-2011 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant
Ecology Grant Agreement No. G1100089
AUTHORIZING SIGNATORY
Signature Print Title/Term of Office
Denis Law Mayor
AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AGREEMENT AMENDMENTS
Signature Print Title
Ron Straka, P.E.Surface Water Utility Engineer
Supervisor
Lys Hornsby, P.E.Utility Systems Director
AUTHORIZED TO SIGN REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT
Signature Print Title
Ron Straka Surface Water Utility Supervisor
Edward Mulhern Surface Water Utility Engineer
7l. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval to accept $297,940 in
non‐matching grant funds from the Department of Ecology to implement Page 144 of 146
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RESCINDING THE
TERMINATION OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY METRO
TRANSIT REGARDING THE KING COUNTY METRO ROUTE 110 PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO
AN ADDENDUM TO THE AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2008, the City Council passed Resolution No. 3987,
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with King County
Metro Transit regarding the King County Metro Route 110 Partnership Agreement (the
"Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2009, the City Council approved the Transportation
Systems Division request to terminate the Agreement in light of budget shortfalls for 2009 and
2010; and
WHEREAS, in later discussions, King County and the City agreed to push back
implementation ofthis Agreement to a date in the future beyond the original implementation
date of September 2010; and
WHEREAS, as the City Council had already approved termination of the Agreement, the
implementation date could not be amended unless the termination was rescinded;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The City Council hereby rescinds the termination of the Agreement.
SECTION III. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an
amendment to the Agreement for the purpose of changing the implementation date.
9a. ‐ Route 110 service partnership agreement with King County Transit
(See 7.h.)Page 145 of 146
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1479:9/2/10:scr
9a. ‐ Route 110 service partnership agreement with King County Transit
(See 7.h.)Page 146 of 146