Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 01/25/2010AGENDA  RENTON CITY COUNCIL    REGULAR MEETING  January 25, 2010  Monday, 7 p.m.  1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2.ROLL CALL 3.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 4.AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting.  Each speaker is allowed five minutes.  The  comment period will be limited to one‐half hour.  The second audience comment period later on in  the agenda is unlimited in duration.)  When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please  walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST  NAME.    NOTICE to all particpants: pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17.130, campaigning for any ballot  measure or candidate from the lectern during any portion of the meeting, and particularly, during  the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED. AUDIENCE COMMENT 5.CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the  recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion.  Any item may be removed for further  discussion if requested by a Councilmember.  CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 1/11/2010. Council concur.  b. Mayor Law appoints Ben Johnson to the Airport Advisory Committee, North Renton alternate  position,  for  an  unexpired  term  expiring  on  5/7/2010  (position  previously  held  by  Beverly  Franklin).  Refer to Community Services Committee.  c. City  Clerk  submits  quarterly  contract  list  for  period  of  10/1/2009  through  12/31/2009  and  expiration report for agreements expiring 1/1/2010 to 6/30/2010.  Information.  d. Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis, Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding  an alleged unfit structure.  Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services.  e. Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of an agreement  with  the  Washington  State  Public  Works  Board  to  accept  $1.7  million  for  infrastructure  improvements related to the Hawk's Landing development. City's share: $100,000.  Council concur.  f. Community and Economic Development Department recommends adopting the 2010 (Fiscal  Year  2011)  Federal  Agenda  to  serve  as  guidance  for  staff  as  it  works  with  Renton's  Congressional delegation, the executive branch and its agencies, and other federal agencies  to achieve City goals.  Council concur.     Page 1 of 244 5.CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the  recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion.  Any item may be removed for further  discussion if requested by a Councilmember.  CONSENT AGENDA g. Community  Services  Department  recommends  approval  of  a  contract  in  the  amount  of  $32,302.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design to replace approximately 290 lineal feet of walkway,  known as the Cedar River Trail replacement project.  Council concur.  h. Community  Services  Department  recommends  approval  of  a  contract  in  the  amount  of  $42,157.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design for patio repair at the Senior Center.  Council concur.  i. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in the amount of $26,153 with  Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for implementation of the 2010 WashWise rebate program  in Renton.  Council concur.  j. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $203,818 with  Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. S./Renton Ave. S. Storm System project.  Council concur.  k. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Addendum No. 2 to CAG‐06‐201, with R.W.  Beck, 2009 Water Design Manual Update, to extend the agreement through 12/31/2010.  Council concur.  6.UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week.  Those topics  marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation.  Committee reports on any topics may be held  by the Chair if further review is necessary.  a.Finance Committee: Vouchers; Shadowhawk LLC Utility Bill Adjustment; Risk Management  Technician Position Reclassification; Lease Amendment with KCSARC  b.Planning & Development Committee: Owner‐Occupied Housing Incentive Extensions &  Modifications*; Multi‐Family Housing Property Tax Extensions and Modifications*  c.Public Safety Committee: Interlocal Agreement with Fire District 25*  d.Utilities Committee: 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual Adoption*  UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolution: a. King County Fire District 25 interlocal agreement (See 6.c.)  Ordinances for first reading: a. Owner‐occupied housing incentive extension and modifications (See 6.b.)  b. Multi‐family housing property tax exemption extension and modifications (See 6.b.)  c. 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.)  8.NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.) NEW BUSINESS 9.AUDIENCE COMMENT             AUDIENCE COMMENT Page 2 of 244 10.ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE  AGENDA   (Preceding Council Meeting)     COUNCIL CHAMBERS   January 25, 2010  Monday, 6:00 p.m.     Federal Legislative Priorities for 2010    • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City  Clerk •   CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:  Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM  ADJOURNMENT Page 3 of 244 Page 4 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Airport Advisory Appointment: Ben Johnson Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Community Service Application Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Executive Staff Contact: Denis Law, Mayor Recommended Action: Refer to Community Services Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Law appoints the following to the Airport Advisory Committee: Mr. Ben Johnson, 447 Wells Ave N, Renton, 98057, North Renton alternate position, for an unexpired term expiring on May 7, 2010 (previously held by Beverly Franklin). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm Mayor Law's appointment of Mr. Johnson to the Airport Advisory Committee. 5b. ‐ Mayor Law appoints Ben Johnson to the Airport Advisory  Committee, North Renton alternate position, for an unexpired term Page 5 of 244 5b. ‐ Mayor Law appoints Ben Johnson to the Airport Advisory  Committee, North Renton alternate position, for an unexpired term Page 6 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: City of Renton Contract Lists: * 4th Quarter 2009 * Six-month Expiration Report Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Signed agreements from 10/1/09 through 12/31/09; Expiring agreements between 1/1/10 and 6/30/10. Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Executive Staff Contact: Bonnie Walton Recommended Action: Information. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The quarterly contract report shows 45 agreements executed between the City and outisde parties and/or agencies during the fourth quarter of 2009. The six-month expiration report shows 33 agreements expiring between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None; Information only. 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 7 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 8 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 9 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 10 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 11 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 12 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 13 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 14 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 15 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 16 of 244 5c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period of 10/1/2009  through 12/31/2009 and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 17 of 244 Page 18 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: CRT-10-001; Court Case Diane Miller vs. City of Renton Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Order Settling Civil Case Schedule Petitioner's Motion For Preliminary Injunction Declaration Of Kirk C. Davis In Support Of Preliminary Injunction Administrative Decision (7/15/2009) Hearing Examiner's Report (12/17/2009) Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Executive Staff Contact: Bonnie Walton Recommended Action: Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: Order Settling Civil Case Schedule, Petitioner's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Declaration of Kirk C. Davis in Support of Preliminary Injunction, filed in Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of King, by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis, Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 19 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 20 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 21 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 22 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 23 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 24 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 25 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 26 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 27 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 28 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 29 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 30 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 31 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 32 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 33 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 34 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 35 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 36 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 37 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 38 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 39 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 40 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 41 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 42 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 43 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 44 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 45 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 46 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 47 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 48 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 49 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 50 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 51 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 52 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 53 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 54 of 244 5d. ‐ Court Case filed by Diane Miller, represented by Kirk C. Davis,  Attorney for Plaintiff, regarding an alleged unfit structure.Page 55 of 244 Page 56 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Public Works Board Infrastructure Grant Agreement; Hawk's Landing development Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Contract LG09-951-121 Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Suzanne Dale Estey x 6591 Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ $1,800,000 Transfer Amendment: $N/A Amount Budgeted: $ $1,800,000 Revenue Generated: $$1,700,000 Total Project Budget: $ $1,800,000 City Share Total Project: $ $100,000 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City of Renton has been awarded a Washington State Public Works Board 2009-2011 Capital Budget direct appropriation grant in order to undertake infrastructure improvements in an area near Exit 7 of Interstate 405 within Renton. The improvements are proposed in conjunction with the anticipated redevelopment of approximately 7.8 acres that has for decades been used as industrial land and warehouse space. Most recently it has been the site of Pan Abode Cedar Homes’ manufacturing facility. The Exit 7 Improvements Project area is also adjacent to May Creek. The State’s investment funds a series of water and stormwater-related infrastructure improvements as well as a regional trail connection that will act as a critical catalyst to make this development more attractive for major office location/relocation decisions. On December 14, 2009, the City Council approved a contract in the amount of $115,775 with Gray and Osborne, Inc. for design, permitting and preparation of construction plans and specifications for the Lake Washington Boulevard Hawk's Landing Storm and Water System Improvement Project, which is an element of these infrastructure improvements. This expenditure, and all related expenditures dating back to May 15, 2009, will be reimbursed by the State upon execution of this contract. Additional funding of $100,000 for this project was approved in the 2010 Surface Water Utility Capital Budget for project management by City staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a contract with the Washington State Public Works Board in the amount of $1,700,000 for a grant for infrastructure improvements related to the Hawk's Landing development and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 57 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 58 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 59 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 60 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 61 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 62 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 63 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 64 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 65 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 66 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 67 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 68 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 69 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 70 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 71 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 72 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 73 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 74 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 75 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 76 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 77 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 78 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 79 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 80 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 81 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 82 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 83 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 84 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 85 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 86 of 244 5e. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  approval of an agreement with the Washington State Public Works Page 87 of 244 Page 88 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: 2010 (Fiscal Year 2011) Federal Agenda Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: 2010 (FY 11) Federal Agenda Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Suzanne Dale Estey (x 6591) Recommended Action: Council concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The 2010 (Fiscal Year 2011) Federal Agenda serves as guidance for City staff as it works with Renton's Congressional delegation, the executive branch and its agencies, and other federal agencies to achieve the City’s goals. The City will be submitting several appropriations requests, pursuing grant opportunities, and seeking funds from any economic recovery package that is passed by Congress. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the 2010 (Fiscal Year 2011) Federal Agenda as proposed. 5f. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  adopting the 2010 (Fiscal Year 2011) Federal Agenda to serve as Page 89 of 244 City of Renton 2010 (FY11) FEDERAL AGENDA Economic Recovery Package – Job-Creating Infrastructure Projects Renton supports passage of an additional federal economic recovery package that will provide critically needed infrastructure improvements and create family wage jobs as the country continues to emerge from this historic recession. The following “ready to go” infrastructure projects have either completed or are far along in their environmental and design phases. All of these projects would help move the Renton community forward, brighten the region’s employment picture and allow taxpayers to see projects implemented quickly: ·Downtown Renton Wayfinding Initiative - $775,000 Option: $400,000 for Phase II only ·SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection Project - completion of rail realignment phase: $4.2 million; completion of rail realignment phase and underpass: $34 million ·Facilities and Parks Maintenance & Operations Center - $12 million ·Barrier Free Sidewalk Project - $1 million ·Street Overlay and Rehabilitation Project - $4 million ·Interstate 405/Highway 167 HOV to HOV Connector - $400 million Lead Agency: WSDOT Other possible appropriations and grant requests and agency/policy needs: Transportation: ·Support for I-405 expansion/Master Plan funding – Lead agency: WSDOT ·NE 3rd and NE 4th corridor improvements ·NE Sunset Boulevard corridor design and improvements ·Park Avenue extension ·FAA relations and Renton Airport RNP/other navigational regulatory issues ·Railroad relations: Union Pacific and BNSF corridor ·Streetcar along Park Avenue Public safety/emergency management: ·Support for Howard Hanson Dam, Green River levee enhancements and US Army Corps relations (in cooperation with King County, Valley cities, state and federal agencies) ·Other FEMA issues – flood recovery funding and floodplain remapping ·Homeland Security/emergency preparedness and FEMA grants ·Police operations -- restored/new COPS program Community and economic development: ·Housing/Community Development Block Grant funding ·Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy and Highlands Task Force recommendations: o Renton Housing Authority Sunset Terrace redevelopment - increase federal capital funding to replace aging public housing and address the provision of Section 8 replacement housing vouchers to facilitate redevelopment o NE Sunset Boulevard improvements (see Transportation) o Regional stormwater/water system funding o Business district redevelopment (HUD, EDA grants) 5f. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  adopting the 2010 (Fiscal Year 2011) Federal Agenda to serve as Page 90 of 244 Community and economic development, continued: ·West Hill Potential Annexation Area: o Business district revitalization (HUD, EDA grants for retention and recruitment, streetscape, pedestrian improvements) o Infrastructure funding o Police operations funding – neighborhood patrols, drug and gang emphasis, and community-based public safety task force o Potential CDBG Community Renewal ·Port Quendall redevelopment - potential EPA/Superfund prioritization, grants (EDA, HUD, other) ·Pan Abode infrastructure needs ·Aerospace cluster and retention of Boeing (support for incentive packages and Tanker contract) ·US Postal Service and possible closure of two of three Renton post offices ·Support increases to the National Housing Trust Fund to create more affordable housing Community Services: ·Parks - May Creek property acquisition/protection wetlands ·Parks - operating and capital funding for transfer and upgrade of King County Parks into the City ·Facilities and Parks Maintenance & Operations Center (also under potential economic recovery requests) ·Trail connectors – implementation of Parks & Trails Master Plan ·Renton History Museum – renovation to enhance public education and community involvement ·Ron Regis Park development 5f. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends  adopting the 2010 (Fiscal Year 2011) Federal Agenda to serve as Page 91 of 244 Page 92 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Cedar River Trail Replacement - Agreement for Services Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Contract Attachment 'A' Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community Services Staff Contact: Leslie Betlach, x-6619; Todd Black, x-6571 Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ $32,302.50 Transfer Amendment: $N/A Amount Budgeted: $ $457,766.31 Revenue Generated: $N/A Total Project Budget: $ $32,302.50 City Share Total Project: $ N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: The existing concrete walkway, between Williams Avenue South and Logan Avenue South, on the south side of the Cedar River, has numerous cracks and unsafe trip hazards due to the adjacent large tree roots. This project will replace approximately 290 lineal feet of the walkway, using thickened, reinforced concrete edges with a narrower, eight foot wide footprint. The trees will be root pruned, and the trail will be moved two feet away from existing trees. The Parks Division adjusted budget for 2009 was $457,766.31 for Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio & Boardwalk Repairs. To date, $258,067.80 has been spent for safety related maintenance projects, leaving a balance of $199,698.51. Funding for the Cedar River Trail Replacement project will be under account number: 316.332009.020.594.76.63.000 Capital Improvement Program - Major Maintenance; Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio & Boardwalk Repairs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a contract with Jr. G Concrete Design for walkway repair in the amount of $32,302.50, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. 5g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $32,302.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design to Page 93 of 244 h:\parks\capital project coordinator\projects a-z\senior housing walkway\contract\2010-003mb (tb crt replacement 1-7-10).doc COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:January 11, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT:Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director (x-6619) Todd Black, Capital Project Coordinator (x-6571) SUBJECT:Cedar River Trail Replacement – Agreement for Services ISSUE: Should the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Agreement for Services with Jr. G Concrete Design, to remove 290 lineal feet of the heaved and cracked Cedar River Trail, and install a new reinforced concrete walk? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract with Jr. G Concrete Design in the amount of $32,302.50 for removal of 290 lineal feet of the 10 foot wide concrete walkway, and install an eight foot wide reinforced concrete walkway. The staff’s estimate for this work was $25,150.00. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The existing concrete walkway, between Williams Avenue South and Logan Avenue South, on the south side of the Cedar River, has numerous cracks and trip hazards due to the adjacent large tree roots. This project will replace only the unsafe portion of the walkway, using thickened, reinforced concrete edges with a narrower, eight foot wide footprint. The trees will be root pruned, and the trail will be moved two feet away from existing trees. Staff secured three bids from contractors, and Jr. G Concrete Design was the low bidder. Staff has reviewed the bid for completeness, inclusion of all required forms, mathematical correctness of the bid, and reference checks. All of the paperwork is in order. Staff proposes to accept the bid of $32,302.50. The Parks Division adjusted budget for 2009 was $457,766.31 for Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio & Boardwalk Repairs. To date, $258,067.80 has been spent for safety related maintenance projects, leaving a remaining balance of $199,698.51. 5g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $32,302.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design to Page 94 of 244 Don Persson, Council President Page 2 of 2 January 11, 2010 h:\parks\capital project coordinator\projects a-z\senior housing walkway\contract\2010-003mb (tb crt replacement 1-7-10).doc Funding for the Cedar River Trail Replacement project will be under account number: 316.332009.020.594.76.63.000 Capital Improvement Program – Major Maintenance; Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio & Boardwalk Repairs. CONCLUSION: Removing and replacing the existing cracked and heaved walkway will provide a safer and more accessible Cedar River Trail. Cc:Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Iwen Wang, Finance Administrator 5g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $32,302.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design to Page 95 of 244 CONTRACT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 2010, between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Jr. G Concrete Design, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR,” to demolish a portion of the existing walkway and install a new concrete walkway for the Cedar River Trail, near Renton Senior Housing. The City and Consultant agree as set forth below. 1.Scope of Services. The Consultant will provide all material and labor necessary to perform all work described in the Scope of Services which is included with this Agreement as Attachment “A.” 2.Changes in Scope of Services. The City, without invalidating the Contract, may order changes in the Services consisting of additions, deletions or modifications, the Contract Sum being adjusted accordingly. Such changes in the work shall be authorized by written Change Order signed by the City and the Consultant. 3.Time of Performance. The Consultant shall commence performance of the Contract no later than ten (10) calendar days after the Notice to Proceed, and shall complete the full performance of the Contract not later than 30 calendar days from the date of commencement. 4.Term Of Contract. The Term of this Agreement shall end at completion of the enclosed scope of work. This Agreement may be extended to accomplish change orders, if required, upon mutual written agreement of the City and the Consultant. 5.Contract Lump Sum. The total lump sum of this Contract is the sum of $32,302.50 which includes Washington State Sales Tax. Written approval shall be sought by the Consultant prior to proceeding beyond this budget maximum. 6.Method of Payment. Payment by the City for the Services will only be made after the Services have been performed and a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form specified by the City. Payment will be made thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or invoice. The City shall have the right to withhold payment to the Consultant for any work not completed in a satisfactory manner until such time as the Consultant modifies such work so that the same is satisfactory. 7.Employment. The Consultant’s employees are not employees of the City of Renton. 8.Assignment and Subcontract. The Consultant shall not assign or subcontract any portion of this Contract without express written consent of the City of Renton. 9.Record Keeping and Reporting. The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and services provided in the performance of this 5g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $32,302.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design to Page 96 of 244 Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to any records required by the City. 10.Hold Harmless. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, including claims from third parties, losses or liability, or any portion thereof, including attorneys fees and costs, arising from injury or death to persons, including injuries, sickness, disease or death to Consultant’s own employees, or damage to property occasioned by a negligent act, omission or failure of the Consultant. The parties have negotiated a waiver of Title 51 RCW and the immunities of that title are hereby waived, for the purposes of this section only, should an employee of either party make a claim sue or pursue a cause of action against the other party. 11.Insurance. The Consultant shall maintain throughout the duration of this contract the following insurance requirements: General Liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate; Professional Liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per claim; Automobile Liability in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident; and proof of Workers’ Compensation coverage. The City of Renton will be name as a Primary and Non-Contributory Additional Insured on the insurance policy and an endorsement stating such shall be provided. 12.Compliance with Laws. The Consultant and all of the Consultant’s employees shall perform the services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. 13.Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this contract, the City of Renton contract shall prevail. 14.Prevailing Wage Rates. By executing this Contact, the Consultant agrees to comply with the State prevailing wage requirements as set forth in the Contract Documents. This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year written above. CONSULTANT Signature Printed Name and Title Jr. G Concrete Design Business Name 2515 State St. Mailing Address Everett, WA 98201 City State Zip 425-931-7003 Telephone CITY OF RENTON Signature Denis Law, Mayor Printed Name and Title 5g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $32,302.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design to Page 97 of 244 Attachment ‘A’ Cedar River Trail Renovation - Scope of Work Jr. G Concrete Design will complete the removal of 290 lineal feet of the Cedar River Trail walkway, on the south side of the Cedar River, between Williams Avenue South and Logan Avenue South, and replacement with a reinforced, eight foot wide walkway. A lump sum fee of Thirty Two Thousand Three Hundred and Two Dollars and Fifty Cents ($32,302.50) includes WSST. 5g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $32,302.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design to Page 98 of 244 5g. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $32,302.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design to Page 99 of 244 Page 100 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Renton Senior Activity Center Patio Replacement - Agreement for Services Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Contract Attachment 'A' Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community Services Staff Contact: Leslie Betlach, x-6619; Todd Black, x-6571 Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ $42,157.50 Transfer Amendment: $N/A Amount Budgeted: $ $457,766.31 Revenue Generated: $N/A Total Project Budget: $ $42,157.50 City Share Total Project: $ N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: The existing brick patio at the Renton Senior Activity Center has numerous cracks and trip hazards due to age, and has been identified by Risk Management as unsafe. This project will replace the brick patio with a reinforced concrete and brick patio, relocate a wood picnic table, and install two donated benches, the latter donated by the Sons of Italy. The Parks Division adjusted budget for 2009 was $457,766.31 for Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio & Boardwalk Repairs. To date, $258,067.80 has been spent for safety related maintenance projects, leaving a balance of $199,698.51. Funding for the Renton Senior Activity Center Patio Replacement project will be under account number: 316.332009.020.594.76.63.000 Capital Improvement Program - Major Maintenance; Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio & Boardwalk Repairs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a contract with Jr. G Concrete Design in the amount of $42,157.50 for patio repair at the Senior Center and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. 5h. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $42,157.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design for Page 101 of 244 H:\PARKS\Capital Project Coordinator\Projects A-Z\Senior Center\Contract\2010-002mb (TB Sr Center Patio Replacement 2010).doc COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:January 11, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT:Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director (x-6619) Todd Black, Capital Project Coordinator (x-6571) SUBJECT:Renton Senior Activity Center Patio Replacement – Agreement for Services ISSUE: Should the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Agreement for Services with Jr. G Concrete Design, to remove the heaved and cracked Renton Senior Activity Center’s brick paver patio, and install a new reinforced concrete and brick patio? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract with Jr. G Concrete Design in the amount of $42,157.50 for removal of the unsafe, cracked brick patio, and install a new reinforced concrete and brick patio. The staff’s estimate for this work was $40,150.00. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The existing brick patio at the Renton Senior Activity Center has numerous cracks and trip hazards due to age, and has been identified by Risk Management as unsafe. This project will replace the brick patio with a reinforced concrete and brick patio, relocate a wood picnic table, and install two new benches, the latter donated by the Sons of Italy. Staff secured three bids from contractors, and Jr. G Concrete Design was the low bidder. Staff has reviewed the bid for completeness, inclusion of all required forms, mathematical correctness of the bid, and reference checks. All of the paperwork is in order. Staff proposes to accept the bid of $42,157.50. The Parks Division adjusted budget for 2009 was $457,766.31 for Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio & Boardwalk Repairs. To date, $258,067.80 has been spent for safety related maintenance projects, leaving a remaining balance of $199,698.51. Funding for the Renton Senior Activity Center Patio Replacement project will be under account number: 5h. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $42,157.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design for Page 102 of 244 Don Persson, Council President Page 2 of 2 January 11, 2010 H:\PARKS\Capital Project Coordinator\Projects A-Z\Senior Center\Contract\2010-002mb (TB Sr Center Patio Replacement 2010).doc 316.332009.020.594.76.63.000 Capital Improvement Program – Major Maintenance; Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio & Boardwalk Repairs. CONCLUSION: Removing and replacing the existing cracked and unsafe brick patio will provide a safer and more accessible patio for the Renton Senior Activity Center. Cc:Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Iwen Wang, Finance Administrator 5h. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $42,157.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design for Page 103 of 244 CONTRACT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 2010, between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Jr. G Concrete Design, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR,” to demolish the existing patio and install a new concrete and brick patio at the Senior Center. The City and Consultant agree as set forth below. 1.Scope of Services. The Consultant will provide all material and labor necessary to perform all work described in the Scope of Work which is included with this Agreement as Attachment “A.” 2.Changes in Scope of Services. The City, without invalidating the Contract, may order changes in the Services consisting of additions, deletions or modifications, the Contract Sum being adjusted accordingly. Such changes in the work shall be authorized by written Change Order signed by the City and the Consultant. 3.Time of Performance. The Consultant shall commence performance of the Contract no later than ten (10) calendar days after the Notice to Proceed, and shall complete the full performance of the Contract not later than 30 calendar days from the date of commencement. 4.Term Of Contract. The Term of this Agreement shall end at completion of the enclosed scope of work. This Agreement may be extended to accomplish change orders, if required, upon mutual written agreement of the City and the Consultant. 5.Contract Lump Sum. The total lump sum of this Contract is the sum of $42,157.50 which includes Washington State Sales Tax. Written approval shall be sought by the Consultant prior to proceeding beyond this budget maximum. 6.Method of Payment. Payment by the City for the Services will only be made after the Services have been performed and a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form specified by the City. Payment will be made thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or invoice. The City shall have the right to withhold payment to the Consultant for any work not completed in a satisfactory manner until such time as the Consultant modifies such work so that the same is satisfactory. 7.Employment. The Consultant’s employees are not employees of the City of Renton. 8.Assignment and Subcontract. The Consultant shall not assign or subcontract any portion of this Contract without express written consent of the City of Renton. 9.Record Keeping and Reporting. The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and services provided in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to any records required by the City. 5h. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $42,157.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design for Page 104 of 244 10.Hold Harmless. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, including claims from third parties, losses or liability, or any portion thereof, including attorneys fees and costs, arising from injury or death to persons, including injuries, sickness, disease or death to Consultant’s own employees, or damage to property occasioned by a negligent act, omission or failure of the Consultant. The parties have negotiated a waiver of Title 51 RCW and the immunities of that title are hereby waived, for the purposes of this section only, should an employee of either party make a claim sue or pursue a cause of action against the other party. 11.Insurance. The Consultant shall maintain throughout the duration of this contract the following insurance requirements: General Liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate; Professional Liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per claim; Automobile Liability in the amount of $1,000,000 per accident; and proof of Workers’ Compensation coverage. The City of Renton will be name as a Primary and Non-Contributory Additional Insured on the insurance policy and an endorsement stating such shall be provided. 12.Compliance with Laws. The Consultant and all of the Consultant’s employees shall perform the services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. 13.Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this contract, the City of Renton contract shall prevail. 14.Prevailing Wage Rates. By executing this Contact, the Consultant agrees to comply with the State prevailing wage requirements as set forth in the Contract Documents. This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year written above. CONSULTANT Signature Printed Name and Title Jr. G Concrete Design Business Name 2515 State St. Mailing Address Everett, WA 98201 City State Zip 425-931-7003 Telephone CITY OF RENTON Signature Denis Law, Mayor Printed Name and Title 5h. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $42,157.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design for Page 105 of 244 Attachment ‘A’ Renton Senior Activity Center Patio Replacement - Scope of Work Jr. G Concrete Design will complete the removal of the existing brick patio, and replace it with a concrete and brick patio. An existing picnic table will be relocated, and two donated benches will be permanently installed. A lump sum fee of Forty Two Thousand One Hundred Fifty Seven Dollars and Fifty Cents ($42,157.50) includes WSST. 5h. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $42,157.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design for Page 106 of 244 5h. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a  contract in the amount of $42,157.50 with Jr. G Concrete Design for Page 107 of 244 Page 108 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Consultant Agreement with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for the 2010 WashWise Rebate Program Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Consultant Agreement Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Abdoul Gafour (ext. 7210), Helen Weagraff (ext. 7287) Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 26,153.00 Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ 40,000.00 (2010 Budget)Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ 40,000.00 City Share Total Project: $ 26,153.00 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Water Utility requests Council’s approval of the consultant agreement with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. (PECI), for the 2010 WashWise Rebate program, in the amount of $26,153.00. This contract will continue the implementation of the WashWise rebate program to the City’s residential water customers who purchase resource-efficient clothes washing machines in support of the City’s water conservation efforts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a consultant agreement with PECI, in the amount of $26,153.00, for the implementation of the 2010 WashWise clothes washing machines rebate program and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign. 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 109 of 244 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 110 of 244 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:January 25, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Abdoul Gafour, Water Engineering Supervisor, (ext. 7210) Helen Weagraff, Aquifer Protection Specialist, (ext. 7287) SUBJECT:Consultant Agreement with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for the 2010 WashWise Rebate Program ISSUE: Should Council approve the consultant agreement with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. (PECI), in the amount of $26,153.00, to continue the implementation of the WashWise Rebate Program in 2010 to the City’s residential water customers who purchase resource-efficient clothes washing machines in support of the City’s water conservation efforts? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the consultant agreement with PECI, in the amount of $26,153.00, for the implementation of the 2010 WashWise for clothes washing machines rebate program in Renton. BACKGROUND: To comply with the Municipal Water Law and Water Use Efficiency Rule (WAC 246-290), the Water Utility needs to continue to implement its water conservation program and water use efficiency measures. Since 2007, Council has approved contracts with PECI to implement the WashWise Rebate Program. WashWise is a water conservation financial incentive program with a goal to stimulate wider public acceptance of resource-efficient clothes washers to help stretch existing water resources and energy supplies. Currently, Puget Sound Energy (PSE), Seattle Public Utilities, and 27 of Renton’s neighboring cities and water districts participate in the WashWise program, which is managed by Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. By participating with the WashWise Program, the City and PSE will each share half of the rebate payouts. The WashWise Program offers rebates of $50.00, $75.00, or $100.00 for the purchase and installation of qualified energy and water-saving clothes washers in residential homes. The more energy and water the washer saves, the higher the rebate, and the average savings is more than 20 gallons per machine per day. In 2009, PECI received 355 qualified 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 111 of 244 Mr. Persson, Council President January 5, 2010 Page 2 of 2 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\revised-WashWise_issue_paper-2010.doc\AGtp applications for rebates from City’s residential water customers with an estimated water saving was 2.96 million gallons. Savings in water consumption from the implementation of the 2010 WashWise Rebate Program is estimated at 3.23 million gallons. The 2010 estimated total cost of $26,153.00 includes: ·PECI’s cost to administer and process the WashWise Rebate Program at $32.00 per rebate request. In 2010, the Water Utility anticipates to receive about 354 rebate requests for an estimated total administrative cost of $11,328.00. ·Actual rebate payouts to qualified water customers are estimated at $14,825.00. Professional services and deliverables to be provided by PECI under the consultant agreement include: ·Program setup and implementation, and production and delivery of promotional materials to all washing machine retailers. ·Development and distribution of mail-in printed rebate forms to all retailers and for placement on City’s web site. ·Field training of the City’s staff and retailers involved in the program. ·Provide a toll-free phone line to respond to questions about the program. ·Verification of rebate eligibility and submitted rebate forms, and issuance of checks for rebates to qualified residential customers within 10 working days of receipt of the request. From 2007 to 2009, the WashWise Rebate Program was funded through the annual budget for water conservation. As part of the City’s budget cost cutting efforts, the Water Utility reduced the total budget for water conservation by $40,000 from the previous year’s (2009) budget of $80,000. The Water Utility considered discontinuing the WashWise Program as part of this cut. Since the WashWise Program is being offered by all neighboring cities and water districts and the program has been popular with residents, the Water Utility recommends that Council approve the 2010 WashWise contract with PECI for $26,153.00 and fund the program using the remaining 2010 budget for water conservation (account no. 425.000000.018.595.34.63.000/u55200). CONCLUSION: The Water Utility needs to continue the implementation of the WashWise Rebate Program to promote City’s water conservation measures and to comply with the Municipal Water Law and Water Use Efficiency Rule. Council’s approval of the contract with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc., is necessary to implement the 2010 WashWise Rebate Program. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director File 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 112 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts ENGINEERING ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this _______, day of __________, 2010, by and between the CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "CITY," and Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. (“PECI”) whose address is 1400 SW 5th Ave, Suite 700 , Portland, OR 97201, at which work will be available for inspection, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT." PROJECT NAME: WashWise Rebate Program 2010 WHEREAS, the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance of a qualified professional consulting firm to do the necessary engineering work for the project, and WHEREAS, the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents, that it is in full compliance with the statutes of the State of Washington for registration of professional engineers, has a current valid business license from the City of Renton and that all personnel to be assigned to the work required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the work to which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner, and that sufficient qualified personnel are on staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement. WHEREAS, the Consultant has indicated that it desires to do the work set forth in the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth below. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performances contained herein below, the parties hereto agree as follows: I SCOPE OF WORK The Consultant shall furnish, and hereby warrants that it has, the necessary equipment, materials, and professionally trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The Consultant shall perform all work described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and amendments to local and state regulations, guidelines and policies. The Consultant shall prepare such information and studies as it may deem pertinent and necessary, in order to pass judgment in a sound engineering manner on the features of the work. The Consultant shall make such minor changes, amendments or revisions in the detail of the work as may be required by the City. This item does not constitute an "Extra Work" item as related in Section VIII of the Agreement. The work shall be verified for accuracy by a complete check by the Consultant. The Consultant will be held responsible for the accuracy of the work, even though the work has been accepted by the City. II DESIGN CRITERIA The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the work needed. Reports and plans, to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of local and State regulations, guidelines, and specifications, including, but not limited to the following: 1.Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA), 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 113 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction," as amended by Renton Standard Specification. 2.WSDOT/APWA, "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction." 3.Washington State Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual." 4.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges." 5.Washington State Department of Transportation, "Bridge Design Manual, Volumes 1 and 2." 6.Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual of Highways Hydraulics," except hydrologic analysis as described in item 14. 7.Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline." 8.Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual." 9.U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways." 10.Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual." 11.Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines." 12.Standard drawings prepared by the City and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all cases where they fit design conditions. Renton Design Standards, and Renton Specifications shall be used as they pertain. 13.Metro Transit, design criteria. 14.King County Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, and Chapters 3, 4, and 5. 15.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets." III ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT BY THE CITY The City will furnish the Consultant copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the preparation of the plans, studies, specifications, and estimates within the limits of the assigned work. All other records needed for the study must be obtained by the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with other available sources to obtain data or records available to those agencies. The Consultant shall be responsible for this and any other data collection to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. City will provide to Consultant all data in City’s possession relating to Consultants services on the project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the City. Should field studies be needed, the Consultant will perform such work to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. The City will not be obligated to perform any such field studies. 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 114 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts IV OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material, including working documents, notes, maps, drawings, photo, photographic negatives, etc. used in the project, shall become and remain the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction. Any use of such documents by the City not directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any liability whatsoever to the Consultant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall retain all of its preexisting intellectual property rights in any materials provided to City. All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing-arrow symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be printed on both sides of the recycled paper, as feasible. V TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed according to Exhibit B, Time Schedule of Completion, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services are to be completed and all products shall be delivered by the Consultant unless there are delays due to factors that are beyond the control of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin work under the terms of this Agreement until authorized in writing by the City. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed, the Consultant is delayed in the performance of its services by factors that are beyond its control, the Consultant shall notify the City of the delay and shall prepare a revised estimate of the time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to the City for its approval. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as otherwise herein. Delays attributable to or caused by one of the parties hereto amounting to 30 days or more affecting the completion of the work may be considered a cause for renegotiation or termination of this Agreement by the other party. 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 115 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts VI PAYMENT The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter as specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work. All billings for compensation for work performed under this Agreement will list actual time (days and/or hours) and dates during which the work was performed and the compensation shall be figured using the rates in Exhibit C. Payment for this work shall not exceed $ 26,153.00 without a written amendment to this contract, agreed to and signed by both parties. Cost Plus Net Fee Payment for work accomplished shall be on the basis of the Consultant's actual cost plus a net fee. The actual cost includes direct salary cost, overhead, and direct non-salary cost. 1.The direct salary cost is the salary expense for professional and technical personnel and principals for the time they are productively engaged in the work necessary to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. The direct salary costs are set forth in the attached Exhibit C and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. 2.The overhead costs as identified on Exhibit C are determined as 175 percent of the direct salary cost and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. The overhead cost rate is an estimate based on currently available accounting information and shall be used for all progress payments over the period of the contract. 3.The direct non-salary costs are those costs directly incurred in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to travel, reproduction, telephone, supplies, and fees of outside consultants. The direct non-salary costs are specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Billings for any direct non-salary costs shall be supported by copies of original bills or invoices. Reimbursement for outside consultants and services shall be on the basis of 1.05 times the invoiced amount. 4.The net fee, which represents the Consultants profit shall be 10 percent of direct salary plus overhead costs. This fee is based on the Scope of Work and the estimated labor hours therein. In the event a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the Consultant, the supplemental agreement will include provision for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The net fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of the project completed as estimated in the Consultant's monthly progress reports and approved by the City. Any portion of the net fee not previously paid in the monthly payments shall be included in the final payment, subject to the provisions of Section XI entitled TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. 5.Progress payments may be claimed monthly for direct costs actually incurred to date as supported by detailed statements, for overhead costs and for a proportionate amount of the net fee payable to the Consultant based on the estimated percentage of the completion of the services to date. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification by the City after completion and acceptance by the City of the work under this Agreement. Acceptance, by the Consultant of final payment shall constitute full and final satisfaction of all amounts due or claimed to be due. Payment for extra work performed under this Agreement shall be paid as agreed to by the parties hereto in writing at the time extra work is authorized. (Section VIII "EXTRA WORK"). A short narrative progress report shall accompany each voucher for progress payment. The report shall include 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 116 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts discussion of any problems and potential causes for delay. To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for consultant employees, the City may conduct employee interviews. Acceptance of such final payment by the Consultant shall constitute a release of all claims of any nature, related to this Agreement, which the Consultant may have against the City unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the City by the Consultant prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that the City may have against the Consultant or to any remedies the City may pursue with respect to such claims. The Consultant and its subconsultants shall keep available for inspection, by the City, for a period of three years after final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement and all items related to, or bearing upon, these records. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year retention period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. The three-year retention period starts when the Consultant receives final payment. VII CHANGES IN WORK The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the completed work of this Agreement as are necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the City, without additional compensation. Should the City find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof revised, the Consultant shall make such revisions, if requested and as directed by the City in writing. This work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as provided in Section VIII. VIII EXTRA WORK The City may desire to have the Consultant perform work or render services in connection with the Project in addition to or other than work provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Work. Such work will be considered as Extra Work and will be specified in a written supplement which will set forth the nature and scope thereof. Work under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to whether work is Extra Work or work already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the work is undertaken. Performance of the work by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any claim by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Work. IX EMPLOYMENT The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 117 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not engage, on a full or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any professional or technical personnel who are, or have been at any time during the period of this contract, in the employ of the City except regularly retired employees, without written consent of the City. If during the time period of this Agreement, the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional, technical, or clerical staff as a result of this work, the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement and interview process. X NONDISCRIMINATION The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for services because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, sex, age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational qualification with regard to, but not limited to the following: employment upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or termination’s; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training; rendition of services. The Consultant understands and agrees that if it violates this Non-Discrimination provision, this Agreement may be terminated by the City and further that the Consultant shall be barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future, unless a showing is made satisfactory to the City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely. XI TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A.The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant, subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with Article IV. B.In the event any Consultant personnel assigned to the project is unable to complete the project, Consultant shall provide replacement personnel with substantially the same qualifications as the personnel being replaced. C.In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City other than for fault on the part of the Consultant, a final payment shall be made to the Consultant for actual cost for the work complete at the time of termination of the Agreement, plus the following described portion of the net fee. The portion of the net fee for which the Consultant shall be paid shall be the same ratio to the total net fee as the work complete is to the total work required by the Agreement. In addition, the Consultant shall be paid on the same basis as above for any authorized extra work completed. No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the Consultant of the Notice to Terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the Consultant prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the Consultant shall immediately reimburse the City for any excess paid. D.In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the Consultant, the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in performing the work to the date of termination, the amount of work originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether that work is in a form or of a type which is usable to the City at the time of termination, the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete the work required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the City of the work 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 118 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set forth in subsection C above had been applied. E.In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work, the original copies of all Engineering plans, reports and documents prepared by the Consultant prior to termination shall become the property of the City for its use without restriction. Such unrestricted use not occurring as a part of this project, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. F.Payment for any part of the work by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies of any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant, or for failure of the Consultant to perform work required of it by the City. Forbearance of any rights under the Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the Consultant. XII DISPUTES Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with work not disposed of by agreement between the Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Director of Planning/ Building/Public Works or his/her successors and delegees, whose decision in the matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties to this Agreement. In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this Agreement, both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, situated in King County. XIII LEGAL RELATIONS The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington. The Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part from the Consultant's errors, omissions, or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant's agents or employees and (b) the City, its agents, officers and employees, this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees except as limited below. The Consultant shall secure general liability, property damage, auto liability, and professional liability coverage in the amount of $1.0 million, with a General Aggregate in the amount of $2.0 million, unless waived or reduced by the City. The Consultant shall submit a completed City of Renton Insurance Information Form, and the Standard Acord Certification Form prior to the execution of the contract. The City of Renton will be named as Additional Insured(s) on (CONTRACTOR’S) policy, with that coverage being primary and non-contributory with any other policy(ies) available to the City. A copy of the endorsement shall be provided to the City. 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 119 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder. All coverages provided by the Consultant shall be in a form, and underwritten by a company acceptable to the City. The City will normally require carriers to have minimum A.M. Best rating of A XII. The Consultant shall keep all required coverages in full force and effect during the life of this project, and a minimum of forty five days' written notice shall be given to the City prior to the cancellation of any policy. The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of relevant insurance policies to the City within 30 days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and Declaration page(s) shall be in a form as approved by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration page(s) on file from a previous contract and no changes in insurance coverage has occurred, only the Certification Form will be required. The Consultant shall verify, when submitting first payment invoice and annually thereafter, possession of a current City of Renton business license while conducting work for the City. The Consultant shall require, and provide verification upon request, that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton business license. The Consultant shall provide, and obtain City approval of, a traffic control plan prior to conducting work in City right-of-way. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitute the Consultant’s waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement. XIV SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement without the express consent of the City. XV RESERVED XVI COMPLETE AGREEMENT This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for, any statement, representation, promise, or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this Agreement. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. XVII EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 120 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF RENTON Signature Date Denis Law, Mayor Date Type or print name ATTEST: Title Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 121 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts RESOLUTION NO. 3229 CITY OF RENTON SUMMARY OF FAIR PRACTICES POLICY ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 3229 It is the policy of the City of Renton to promote and provide equal treatment and service to all citizens and to ensure equal employment opportunity to all persons without regard to race, color, national origin, ethnic background, gender, marital status, religion, age or disability, when the City of Renton can reasonably accommodate the disability, of employees and applicants for employment and fair, non-discriminatory treatment to all citizens. All departments of the City of Renton shall adhere to the following guidelines: (1)EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - The City of Renton will ensure all employment related activities included recruitment, selection, promotion, demotion, training, retention and separation are conducted in a manner which is based on job-related criteria which does not discriminate against women, minorities and other protected classes. Human resources decisions will be in accordance with individual performance, staffing requirements, governing civil service rules, and labor contract agreements. (2)COOPERATION WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS - The City of Renton will cooperate fully with all organizations and commissions organized to promote fair practices and equal opportunity in employment. (3)AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN - The City of Renton Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program will be maintained and administered to facilitate equitable representation with the City work force and to assure equal employment opportunity to all. It shall be the responsibility of elected officials, the Mayor, the Affirmative Action Officer, department administrators, managers, supervisors, Contract Compliance Officers and all employees to carry out the policies, guidelines and corrective measures set forth in the Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program. (4)CONTRACTORS’ OBLIGATIONS - Contractors, sub-contractors, consultants and suppliers conducting business with the City of Renton shall affirm and subscribe to the Fair Practices and Non-discrimination policies set forth by the law and in the City’s Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program. Copies of this policy shall be distributed to all City employees, shall appear in all operational documentation of the City, including bid calls, and shall be prominently displayed in appropriate city facilities. 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 122 of 244 H:\File Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-25 - Water Dept Public Relations\WashWiseRebateProgram\PECI-contract-2010\2010-contract with PECI 2009 changes.doc\ msoffice 1 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. (“PECI”) hereby confirms and declares that ( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) I.It is PECI’s policy to offer equal ( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) opportunity to all qualified employees and applicants for employment without regard to the race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, disability or veteran status. II.PECI complies with all applicable federal, ( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) state and local laws governing non-discrimination in employment. III.When applicable, PECI will seek out and ( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) negotiate with minority and women contractors for the award of subcontracts. Print Agent/Representative’s Name and Title Agent/Representative’s Signature Instructions: This document MUST be completed by each contractor, subcontractor, consultant and/or supplier. Include or attach this document(s) with the contract. 5i. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in  the amount of $26,153 with Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. for Page 123 of 244 Page 124 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Engineering Consultant Agreement Lake Avenue South/ Rainier Avenue South Storm System Project, SWP-27-3529 Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Engineering Consultant Agreement Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Ron Straka (ext. 7248), Daniel Carey (ext. 7293) Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 203,818.00 Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ 692,461.00 Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ 700,000.00 City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Lake Avenue South/Rainier Avenue South Storm System project will replace approximately 650 feet of existing 24- inch storm pipe with a new stormwater pipe capable of carrying the peak flow from the drainage basin. The existing storm system is about 50-years old and a significant portion is in poor structural condition. The project is located in the vacated right-of-way of Lake Avenue South, primarily in the parking lot for the Safeway store on South 3rd Street and in the Walker’s Renton Subaru used car lot at the northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 3rd Street. The engineering consultant agreement with Parametrix, Inc. will provide surveying, geotechnical investigations, archaeological investigation, contaminated soils investigation, preliminary engineering, hydraulic analysis, permit assistance, final engineering, construction plans and specifications, and engineering support during construction for the new stormwater system. Parametrix, Inc. was selected from the approved 2010 Utility Systems Annual Consultant Roster. The project is funded from the Surface Water Utility’s 427 Fund Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the Lake Avenue South/Renton Avenue South Storm System Project, account number 427.475445.018.5950.0038.63.000000. The approved 2009 CIP budget for the project was $700,000. A total of $692,461 of the project budget remains, which will be included in the 2010 Carryforward Ordinance request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consultant Agreement with Parametrix, Inc. for design of the Lake Avenue South/Renton Avenue South Storm System Project, in the amount of $203,818.00. 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 125 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 126 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 127 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 128 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 129 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 130 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 131 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 132 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 133 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 134 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 135 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 136 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 137 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 138 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 139 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 140 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 141 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 142 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 143 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 144 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 145 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 146 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 147 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 148 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 149 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 150 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 151 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 152 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 153 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 154 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 155 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 156 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 157 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 158 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 159 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 160 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 161 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 162 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 163 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 164 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 165 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 166 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 167 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 168 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 169 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 170 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 171 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 172 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 173 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 174 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 175 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 176 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 177 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 178 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 179 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 180 of 244 5j. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the  amount of $203,818 with Parametrix, Inc. for the design of the Lake Ave. Page 181 of 244 Page 182 of 244 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual Update, Addendum No. 2 to CAG 06-201, Time Extension Only Meeting: Regular Council - 25 Jan 2010 Exhibits: Addendum No. 2 Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Ron Straka (ext. 7248), Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Addendum No. 2 to the Surface Water Design Manual Update consultant agreement, CAG 06-201, with R.W. Beck, Inc. extending the time of completion from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010. This extension is needed to complete the final edits to the City’s amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the ordinance adopting the amendments. It is expected that Council will adopt the City amendments and ordinance by February, 2010. The extra time will also allow staff and the consultant to identify and incorporate revisions to the amendments document, if necessary, once the manual is in use. It is anticipated that there will be no change in the contract budget as a result of this time extension. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Addendum No. 2 to the Surface Water Design Manual consultant agreement, CAG-06-201, with R.W. Beck, Inc. extending the time of completion from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010. 5k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Addendum No. 2  to CAG‐06‐201, with R.W. Beck, 2009 Water Design Manual Update, to Page 183 of 244 H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-3129 Renton Stormwater Manual\1103-Consultant Contracts\Addendum No. 2.doc\AQtp Addendum/bh 12/08 ADDENDUM NO. 2 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES for City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual Update CAG 06-201 This Addendum is made and entered into this____, day of _____, 2010 by and between the City of Renton, hereinafter called the “City”, and R.W. Beck, Inc., whose address is, 1001 Fourth Ave., Suite 2500, Seattle, WA 98154-1004, hereinafter called the “Consultant”. WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the City engaged the services of the consultant under Engineering Consultant Agreement CAG 06-201, dated December 22, 2006 to provide engineering services necessary for the City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual Update, and WHEREAS, the City desires to complete the work associated with the City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual Update, and the City does not have sufficient qualified engineering employees to perform the work within a reasonable time; and WHEREAS, the City and consultant have determined that additional time is needed to complete the City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual Update; NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section V Time of Beginning and Completion of the Master Agreement CAG 06-201, dated December 22, 2006, it is mutually agreed upon that Engineering Consultant Agreement CAG 06-201, is amended to include a time extension as follows: 1. The Time of Completion (Section V of the Master Agreement CAG 06-201) for the above referenced contract is extended until December 31, 2010. It is anticipated that this time extension will not result in an adjustment in the contract budget. All other provisions of Consultant Agreement CAG 06-201 dated December 22, 2006 shall apply to this addendum. EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum No. 2 to ENGINEERING CONSULTANT AGREEMENT CAG 06-201 as of the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF RENTON Signature Date Denis Law, Mayor Type or Print Name ATTEST: Title Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 5k. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of Addendum No. 2  to CAG‐06‐201, with R.W. Beck, 2009 Water Design Manual Update, to Page 184 of 244 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES OPERATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #25. WHEREAS, both the City of Renton and King County Fire Protection District #25 are authorized under the provisions of RCW 39.34.080 and 52.08.035 to contract with each other to establish fire prevention, education, suppression, and emergency medical services for the citizens within their respective boundaries; and WHEREAS, both parties desire to maintain the service within their respective boundaries in the entire service area, and believe that this will be most effectively furnished by establishing services on a contractual basis; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement entitled "Fire and Emergency Services Operating Agreement Between the City of Renton and King County Fire District #25" to establish fire prevention, education, suppression, and emergency medical services for the citizens within their respective boundaries. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 7a. ‐ King County Fire District 25 interlocal agreement (See 6.c.) Page 185 of 244 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of ,2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1434:12/18/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 7a. ‐ King County Fire District 25 interlocal agreement (See 6.c.) Page 186 of 244 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 4-1-210, WAIVED FEES, OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", BY EXTENDING AND MODIFYING THE WAIVER OF CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AND MITIGATION FEES. WHEREAS, on August 27, 2001, the Renton City Council approved Ordinance No. 4913 (codified in RMC 4-1-210) to allow certain development and mitigation fees for housing that is for sale to be waived to encourage owner-occupied housing in the CD and RM-U zones; and WHEREAS, these development and mitigation fee waivers are effective for eligible building permits issued after August 13, 2001, and will sunset on December 31, 2009, unless extended by City Council action; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Subsection 4-1-210B, Downtown Owner-Occupied Housing Incentive, helped to establish the 37-unit "55 Williams" and the 50-unit "Chateau de Ville" condominium projects as new owner-occupied housing in downtown Renton and may similarly prove beneficial for the proposed 24-unit "Chelsea" condominium project and the 5-unit "Blakey" townhomes project in downtown Renton; and WHEREAS, the development and mitigation fee waivers currently apply to eligible projects in the CD, RM-U, and RM-T zones of the Urban Center Comprehensive Plan designation; and WHEREAS, the City now seeks to expand the development and mitigation fee waivers to encourage new owner-occupied housing in the Sunset Area; and 7a. ‐ Owner‐occupied housing incentive extension and modifications  (See 6.b.)Page 187 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the City further seeks to modify the application process to conform with the current organizational chart for the Community and Economic Development Department; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to encourage additional new owner-occupied housing in downtown Renton and the Sunset Area; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to extend the development and mitigation fee waivers through December 31, 2012, unless further extended by City Council action; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-1-210B, Downtown Owner-Occupied Housing Incentive, of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Owner-Occupied Housing Incentive", and to read as follows: B. OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING INCENTIVE: 1. Purpose: To encourage owner-occupied housing in the CD, RM-U, and RM-T zones of the Urban Center Comprehensive Plan designation and the CV, RM-F, and R-14 zones within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation, certain development and mitigation fees for "For Sale" housing may be waived for eligible projects, subject to City Council approval. 2. Eligibility Criteria: To qualify for waived fees, projects must meet the following criteria: a. The project is new construction; and 7a. ‐ Owner‐occupied housing incentive extension and modifications  (See 6.b.)Page 188 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. b. All of the housing units will be platted or condominium "For Sale" housing; and c. The project will be a minimum often (10) units if in the RM-T zone of the Urban Center Comprehensive Plan designation or the RM-F zone or R-14 zone within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation; or d. The project will be a minimum of thirty (30) units if in the CD zone or RM-U zone of the Urban Center Comprehensive Plan designation or the CV zone within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation. 3. Applicable Fees: Fees which may be waived are: a. Building permit fees; b. Building permit plan review fees; c. Water, surface water, and wastewater system development charges; d. Public Works plan review and inspection fees; and e. Fire, transportation, and parks impact mitigation fees. 4. Application Process: Persons who intend to apply for the owner- occupied housing incentive fee waivers must disclose their intent to apply for waived fees prior to or by the administrative site plan review period. The application for waived fees must be made to the Planning Director (or any other City office, department or agency that shall succeed to its functions with respect to this Section, or his or her authorized designee) at the time of the land use application, unless otherwise approved by City Council. 7a. ‐ Owner‐occupied housing incentive extension and modifications  (See 6.b.)Page 189 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 5. Restrictive Covenant: All residential units which obtain a successful fee waiver must contain a restrictive covenant indicating that the units will be platted or will be restricted to condominium housing. After review and approval of the waiver by the City Council and the review and approval of the restrictive covenant by the Planning Director or his/her designee, the restrictive covenant must be executed and recorded at the applicant's expense prior to the issuance of the building permit for the project, unless otherwise approved by City Council. Failure to timely execute and record the covenant will result in the Applicant being responsible for any and all applicable fees and interest accrued as a result of the delay. 6. Cancellation of Covenant: After the application has been approved and/or the restrictive covenant is recorded, if the type of housing to be offered is altered from owner-occupied "For Sale" new housing, all applicable fees must be paid with interest. 7. Effective Date and Sunset: These fee waivers are effective for building permits issued after August 13, 2001, and will sunset on December 31, 2012, unless extended by City Council action. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 7a. ‐ Owner‐occupied housing incentive extension and modifications  (See 6.b.)Page 190 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1619:12/11/09 Denis Law, Mayor 7a. ‐ Owner‐occupied housing incentive extension and modifications  (See 6.b.)Page 191 of 244 Page 192 of 244 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 4-1-220, PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING IN RESIDENTIAL TARGETED AREAS, OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", BY EXTENDING THE PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION AND MODIFYING THE NAME OF THE HIGHLANDS DESIGNATED RESIDENTIAL TARGETED AREA. WHEREAS, on December 22, 2003, the Renton City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5061 (codified in RMC 4-1-220) to establish a limited property tax exemption to encourage multi- family housing development in designated residential targeted areas; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 4-1-220, Property Tax Exemption for Multi-Family Housing in Residential Targeted Areas, have been successful in encouraging increased residential opportunities and in stimulating new construction of multi-family housing in residential targeted areas; and WHEREAS, the City now seeks to rename the "Highlands" designated residential targeted area as the "Sunset Area" to correspond with the recent planning effort in the area; and WHEREAS, aside from the name change, the existing purpose and applicability of the property tax exemption and the eligible zoning and boundary of the "Highlands" designated residential targeted area will remain the same; and WHEREAS, the City further seeks to amend RMC 4-1-220 to extend the property tax exemption to encourage additional future multi-family housing projects in the residential targeted areas; 7b. ‐ Multi‐family housing property tax exemption extension and  modifications (See 6.b.)Page 193 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-l-220D.l.a, Highlands, of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to change the title to "Sunset Area", and to read as follows: a. Sunset Area: Within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation and in one of the following: the Center Village (CV) Zone, the Residential Multi- Family (RM-F) Zone, or the Residential 14 Dwelling Units/Acre (R-14) Zone; or SECTION II. Subsection 4-1-220M, Sunset of Exemption for Applications for Conditional Certificates, of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: M. SUNSET OF EXEMPTION FOR APPLICATIONS FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATES: The City shall not accept new applications for conditional certificates as provided in RMC 4-1-220E after December 31, 2012, unless extended by City Council action. Incomplete applications for conditional certificates as of December 31, 2012, shall be returned to owners. Notwithstanding the above, the City shall process (1) pending complete applications for a conditional certificate as of December 31, 2012, and (2) applications for an extension of the conditional certificate and/or a final certificate received after December 31, 7b. ‐ Multi‐family housing property tax exemption extension and  modifications (See 6.b.)Page 194 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 2012, as provided in this Section under RMC 4-1-220D through 4-1-220J. RMC 4- 1-220C and 4-1-220J through 4-1-220L shall continue to apply to all properties that have been or are issued a final certificate of tax exemption under this Section until expiration, termination or cancellation of the tax exemption. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1618:12/18/09:scr Denis Law, Mayor 7b. ‐ Multi‐family housing property tax exemption extension and  modifications (See 6.b.)Page 195 of 244 Page 196 of 244 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS; CHAPTER 3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS; CHAPTER 4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; CHAPTER 6, STREET AND UTILITY STANDARDS; CHAPTER 8, PERMITS - GENERAL AND APPEALS; CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC; AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO AMEND DRAINAGE REGULATIONS AND ADOPT BY REFERENCE PORTIONS OF THE KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The row labeled "R-l" in the Maximum Building Coverage section of subsection 4-2-110A, Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment A. SECTION II. The Maximum Impervious Surface Area section of subsection 4-2-110A, Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION III. Subsection 4-3-050C.5.d.ii, New or Modified Regional Stormwater Facilities, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 197 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment C. SECTION IV. Subsection 4-3-050C.7.a.ii, Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities in Buffer, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment D. SECTION V. Subsection 4-3-050C.7.a, Activities in Critical Area Buffers, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection iii, entitled "Stormwater Conveyance in Buffer", to read as shown on Attachment E. SECTION VI. Subsection 4-3-050H.2.d.vi(b), Site Improvements, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: (b) Site Improvements: (1) For facilities located in Zone 1 of an APA, the owner may be required to pave all currently unpaved areas of their facility that are subject to any vehicular use or storage, use, handling, or production of hazardous materials. (2) For those facilities located in Zone 1 of an APA in which the nature of the business involves the use of hazardous materials outside of fully enclosed structures, the City shall evaluate the existing storm water collection and 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 198 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. conveyance system, and reserves the right to require the owner to upgrade the system to meet the provisions of RMC 4-6-030E4(f), Special Requirement 6 - Aquifer Protection Area (APA). (3) For those facilities located in Zone 1 of an APA, the City may require the owner to test interior wastewater plumbing and the building side sewer for tightness according to subsection H6a(ii) of this Section, Pipeline Requirements - Zone 1, and reserves the right to require that such wastewater conveyance be repaired or replaced according to subsection H6a(i) of this Section, Pipeline Requirements-Zone 1. SECTION VII. Subsection d of subsection 4-3-110E.5, Standards Within Entire Urban Separator, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: d. Stormwater management shall comply with the Surface Water Design Manual. SECTION VIII. Subsection 4-4-030B, Adoption by Reference, of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: B. ADOPTION BY REFERENCE: The goals, objectives, and policies as set forth in the following documents and related studies or documents are presently in force or as modified from time 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 199 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. to time are hereby incorporated by reference and shall be considered as if fully set forth herein: Cedar River Master Plan Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Green River Valley Plan Fire Department Master Plan Airport Master Plan Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan Comprehensive Water System Plan Long Range Wastewater Management Plan King County Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Shoreline Master Program King County Solid Waste Management Plan Countywide Planning Policies Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan Street Arterial Plan Traffic Mitigation Resolution and Fee Parks Mitigation Resolution and Fee Fire Mitigation Resolution and Fee Comprehensive Plan SECTION IX. Subsection 4-4-030C.5, Temporary Erosion Control, of Chapter 4, City- wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 200 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. Temporary Erosion Control: Temporary erosion control must be installed and maintained for the duration of the project. This work must comply with the Surface Water Design Manual and must be approved by the Renton Development Services Division. SECTION X. Subsection 4-4-030C.6, Hydroseeding Required, of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 6. Hydroseeding Required: Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual may be proposed between the dates of October 1st and April 30th of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. SECTION XI. Subsection 4-4-060A, Purpose, of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add two new subsections, 5 and 6, to read as follows: 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 201 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 5. Minimize adverse stormwater impacts generated by the removal of vegetation and alteration of landform in order to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit. 6. Protect water quality from the adverse impact associated with erosion and sedimentation in order to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit. SECTION XII. Subsection 4-4-060C.4, Hydroseeding Required, of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Hydroseeding Required: Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual may be proposed between the dates of October 1st and April 30th of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. SECTION XIII. Section 4-4-060, Grading, Excavating and Mining Regulations, of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 202 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection D, entitled General Erosion and Sediment Control Standards, to read as shown below. The current subsections D-E shall be re-lettered accordingly. D. GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STANDARDS: 1. Erosion and Sediment Control Required: A person who clears, grades or otherwise disturbs a site shall provide erosion and sediment control that prevents, to the maximum extent practicable, the transport of sediment from the site to drainage facilities, water resources and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment controls shall be applied as specified by the temporary erosion and sediment control measures and performance criteria and implementation requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual adopted in accordance with RMC 4-6-030. 2. Seasonal Limitations: From October 1 through April 30, which is the seasonal limitation period, clearing and grading shall only be permitted if shown to the satisfaction of the Director that runoff leaving the construction site will comply with the erosion and sediment control measures and performance criteria and implementation requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual through a combination of the following: a. Site conditions including vegetative coverage, slope, soil type and proximity to receiving waters; and 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 203 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. b. Proposed limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and c. Proposed erosion and sedimentation control measures. 3. Expansion or Restriction of Seasonal Limitations: Based on the information provided under subsection Dl of this section, the Administrator or designee may expand or restrict the seasonal limitations on site disturbance. The Administrator or designee shall set forth in writing the basis for approval or denial of clearing or grading during the seasonal limitation period. 4. Approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Required: During the seasonal limitation period, clearing and grading will be allowed only if there is installation and maintenance of an erosion and sedimentation control plan approved by the City of Renton Development Services Division that defines any limits on clearing and grading or specific erosion and sediment control measures required during the seasonal limitation period. The Development Services Division may require or approve alternate best management practices. 5. Violation: If, during the course of construction activity or soil disturbance during the seasonal limitation period, silt-laden runoff violating standards in the Surface Water Design Manual leaves the construction site or if clearing and grading limits or erosion and sediment control measures shown in the approved plan are not maintained, the department inspector shall have the responsibility and authority to issue a partial or total stop work order. 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 204 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 6. Continued Violation: If the erosion and sediment control problem defined in the stop work order is not adequately repaired within twenty-four (24) hours of issuance, then a notice and order may be issued to install adequate erosion and sediment control measures to stop silt-laden runoff from leaving the site. The order may also require the property owner to discontinue any further clearing or grading, except for erosion and sediment control maintenance and repair, until the following April 30. SECTION XIV. Subsection 4-4-060E, Inspection, of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby re-lettered as subsection F pursuant to Section X of this ordinance, and amended to read as follows: F. INSPECTION: 1. Inspection Authorized: All operations regulated by this Section shall be subject to inspection by authorized Development Services Division inspection personnel. When extraordinary or special problems or conditions are involved, extra inspection of grading operations and special tests may be ordered by the City. 2. Entry to be Permitted: No owner or occupant or any other person having charge, care or control of any building, land, structure, premises or portion thereof shall fail or neglect, after proper demand, to promptly permit lawful entry thereon by the Development Services Division inspection personnel for the purpose of inspection and examination pursuant to this Section. 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 205 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XV. Section 4-4-060, Grading, Excavating and Mining Regulations, of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection G, entitled Restoration of Hazard Required, to read as shown below. The current subsections G-S shall be re-lettered accordingly. G. RESTORATION OF HAZARD REQUIRED: Whenever the Administrator or designee determines that an existing site, as a result of clearing or grading, excavation, embankment, or fill has become a hazard to life and limb, or endangers property, or adversely affects the safety, use or stability of a public way or drainage channel, the owner of the property upon which the clearing, grading, excavation or fill is located, or other person or agent in control of said property, upon receipt of notice in writing from the Administrator or designee, shall within the period specified therein restore the site affected by such clearing or grading or repair or eliminate such excavation or embankment or fill so as to eliminate the hazard and be in conformance with the requirements of this chapter. SECTION XVI. Subsection 4-4-060Q, Permits and Fees, of Chapter 4, City-wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby re-lettered as subsection S pursuant to Section XII of this ordinance, and amended to change the title to "Permits and Fees Required" and to read as follows: 10 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 206 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. S. PERMITS AND FEES REQUIRED: 1. Submittal Requirements and Fees: Grading, excavation and mining permits and licenses are required per RMC 4-9-080 for major and minor activities. Submittal requirements are listed in RMC 4-8-120, Submittal Requirements - Specific to Application Type. Application fees are listed per Chapter 4-1 RMC, Administration and Enforcement. 2. Threshold for Drainage Review: A person applying for a grading, excavation and mining permit and license shall be required to comply with all drainage review requirements per RMC chapter 4-6-030 if the project results in seven thousand (7,000) square feet or more of land disturbing activity. 3. Plans and Calculations Required: Submittal of plans and supportive calculations shall be in accordance with RMC 4-6-030. SECTION XVII. Section 4-6-030, Drainage (Surface Water) Standards, of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to read as follows: 4-6-030 DRAINAGE (SURFACE WATER) STANDARDS: A. PURPOSE: 1. The purpose of this Section shall be to promote and develop policies with respect to the City's watercourses and to preserve them by minimizing water quality degradation by previous siltation, sedimentation and pollution of creeks, streams, rivers, lakes and other bodies of water, and to protect property owners 11 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 207 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. tributary to developed and undeveloped land from increased runoff rates and to ensure the safety of roads and rights-of-way. 2. It shall also be the purpose of this Section to reduce flooding, erosion, and sedimentation; prevent and mitigate habitat loss; enhance groundwater recharge; and prevent water quality degradation through permit review, construction inspection, enforcement, and maintenance in order to promote the effectiveness of the requirements. 3. It shall also be a purpose of this Section to regulate the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) regarding the contribution of pollutants, consisting of any material other than stormwater, including but not limited to illicit discharges, illicit connections and/or dumping into any storm drain system, including surface and/or groundwater throughout the City that would adversely impact surface and groundwater quality of the City and the State of Washington, in order to comply with requirements of the National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit. B. ADMINISTERING AND ENFORCING AUTHORITY: The Administrator of the Public Works Department is responsible for the general administration and coordination of this Section. All provisions of this Section shall be enforced by the Administrator or his or her designated representatives. 12 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 208 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. C. ADOPTION OF SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL: The 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as now or as hereafter may be amended by King County or the City of Renton, and hereby referred to as the Surface Water Design Manual, is hereby adopted by reference, with the exception of Chapters 1 and 2 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual which are not adopted. Chapters 1 and 2 of the Surface Water Design Manual, as amended by the City of Renton to specify local requirements and procedures, are hereby adopted by reference. References 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4D, 7B, 7C, 8F, 8G, 9 and 10 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual are not adopted. One copy of the Surface Water Design Manual shall be filed with the City Clerk including any amendments thereto. D. WHEN REQUIRED: All persons applying for any of the following permits and/or approvals shall submit for approval a drainage plan with their application and/or request: 1. Mining, excavation or grading permit or license; 2. Shoreline permit; 3. Flood control zone permit; 4. Subdivision; 5. Short plat; 6. Special permit; 7. Temporary permit when involving land disturbance; 8. Building Permit; 13 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 209 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 9. Planned urban development; 10. Site plan approval; 11. Construction Permit; 12. Stormwater Permit; 13. Binding Site Plan; 14. Any other development or permit application which will affect the drainage in any way. The plan submitted during one permit approval process may be subsequently submitted with further required applications. The plan shall be supplemented with additional information at the request of the Public Works Department. E. DRAINAGE REVIEW: 1. When Required: A drainage review is required when any proposed project is subject to a City of Renton permit or approval as determined under Subsection D of this Section and: a. Would result in two thousand (2,000) square feet or more of new impervious surface, replace impervious surface or new plus replaced impervious surface; or b. Would involve seven thousand (7,000) square feet of land disturbing activity; or c. Would construct or modify a drainage pipe or ditch that is twelve inches (12") or more in size or depth or receives surface or stormwater runoff 14 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 210 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. from a drainage pipe or ditch that is twelve inches (12") or more in size or depth; or d. Contains or is adjacent to a critical area designation, defined and regulated in RMC 4-3-050. 2. Scope of Review: The drainage review for any proposed project shall be scaled to the scope of the project's size, type of development and potential for impacts to the regional surface water system to facilitate preparation and review of project applications. If drainage review for a proposed project is required under Subsection E of this Section, the Renton Development Services Division shall determine which of the following drainage reviews apply as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual: a. Small project drainage review; b. Targeted drainage review; c. Full drainage review; d. Large project drainage review. 3. Core Requirements: A proposed project required to have drainage review by Subsection El of this Section must meet each of the following core requirements which are described in detail in the Surface Water Design Manual. Projects subject only to small project drainage review that meet the small project drainage requirements specified in the Surface Water Design Manual, including flow control best management practices, erosion and sediment control 15 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 211 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. measures, and drainage plan submittal requirements are deemed to comply with the following core requirements: a. Core requirement 1 - Discharge at the natural location: All surface and storm water runoff from a project shall be discharged at the natural location so as not to be diverted onto, or away from, downstream properties. The manner in which runoff is discharged from the project site shall not create a significant adverse impact to downhill properties or drainage systems as specified in the discharge requirements of the Surface Water Design Manual. b. Core requirement 2 - Offsite analysis: The initial application submittal for proposed projects shall include an offsite analysis report that assesses potential offsite drainage impacts associated with development of the proposed site and proposes appropriate mitigations to those impacts. This initial submittal shall include, at minimum, a Level One downstream analysis as described in the Surface Water Design Manual. If impacts are identified, the proposed projects shall meet any applicable problem-specific requirements as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. c. Core Requirement 3 - Flow control: Proposed projects including redevelopment projects that would result in two thousand (2,000) square feet or more of new plus replaced impervious surface or thirty-five thousand (35,000) square feet or more of new pervious surface, shall provide flow control facilities or flow control BMPs, or both, to control surface and storm water runoff generated by new impervious surface, new pervious surface, and replaced 16 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 212 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. impervious surface, as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. Flow control facilities shall meet the area-specific flow control facility requirements and in accordance with the applicable flow control facility implementation requirements as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. Flow control BMPs shall also be applied as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. Projects subject to area-specific flow control facility requirements as shown in Reference 11-A of the Surface Water Design Manual shall meet one of the following flow control facility performance criteria as directed in the Surface Water Design Manual: i. Peak Rate Flow Control Standard: Shall match the predeveloped site's peak discharge rates for the two year, ten year and one hundred year return periods assuming existing site conditions as the predeveloped site condition; ii. Flow Control Duration Standard (for existing site conditions): Shall match the predeveloped site's discharge duration for the discharge rates between fifty percent (50%) of the two year peak flow through the fifty year peak flow and the two and ten year peak discharge assuming existing site conditions as the predeveloped site condition; iii. Flow Control Duration Standard (for forested site conditions): Shall match the predeveloped site's discharge duration for the discharge rates between fifty percent (50%) of the two year peak flow through the fifty year 17 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 213 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. peak flow and the two and ten year peak discharge assuming forested site conditions as the predeveloped site condition. iv. Flood Problem Flow Control Standard: Shall meet the flow control duration standard in number iii above and also match the predeveloped site's discharge rate for the hundred-year return period. d. Core requirement 4-Conveyance system: All engineered conveyance system elements for proposed projects shall be analyzed, designed and constructed to provide the minimum level of protection against overtopping, flooding, erosion and structural failure as specified by the conveyance requirements for new and existing systems and conveyance implementation requirements described in the Surface Water Design Manual. e. Core requirement 5 - Erosion and sediment control: All proposed projects that will clear, grade or otherwise disturb the site shall provide erosion and sediment control that prevents, to the maximum extent practicable, the transport of sediment from the site to drainage facilities, water resources and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment controls shall be applied in accordance with RMC 4-4-060 and RMC 4-4-130 as specified by the temporary erosion and sediment control measures and performance criteria and implementation requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual. f. Core requirement 6-Maintenance and operation: Maintenance of all drainage facilities in compliance with City of Renton Maintenance Standards is 18 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 214 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. the responsibility of property owner as described in the Surface Water Design Manual. g. Core requirement 7 - Financial guarantees and liability: All drainage facilities constructed or modified for projects, except downspout infiltration and dispersion systems for single family residential lots, must comply with the liability requirements of RMC 4-6-030M. h. Core requirement 8 - Water quality: Proposed projects that would result in five thousand (5,000) square feet or more of new pollution generating impervious surface or thirty-five thousand (35,000) square feet or more of new pollution-generating pervious surface, or that are redevelopment projects that would result in a total of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more of new and replaced pollution-generating impervious surface, shall provide water quality treatment facilities to treat polluted surface and storm water runoff generated by new or replaced pollution-generating impervious surface, as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. Water quality treatment facilities shall meet the land-use water quality treatment requirements and the water quality implementation requirements applicable to the project site as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. The facilities specified by these requirements are designed to reduce pollutant loads according to the applicable annual average performance goals listed in Subsections h.i and h.ii of this Section for ninety-five percent (95%) of the annual average runoff volume: 19 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 215 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. i. for basic water quality: remove eighty percent (80%) of the total suspended solids; ii. for enhanced basic water quality: remove fifty percent (50%) of the total zinc. 4. Special Requirements: A proposed project required by Subsection E of this Section to have drainage review shall meet any of the following special requirements which apply to the site and which are described in detail in the Surface Water Design Manual. The City of Renton Development Services Division shall verify if a proposed project is subject to and must meet any of the following special requirements: a. Special Requirement 1 - Other area specific requirements: The Surface Water Utility may apply a more restrictive requirement for controlling drainage on an area-specific basis. Other adopted area-specific regulations may include requirements that have a direct bearing on the drainage design of a proposed project. b. Special Requirement 2 - Flood hazard delineation: If a proposed project contains or is adjacent to a stream, lake, wetland or closed depression, or if other City regulations require study of flood hazards relating to the proposed project, the one hundred year floodplain boundaries and floodway shall be determined and delineated on the site improvement plans and profiles and any final maps prepared for the proposed project. The flood hazard study shall be prepared for as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. 20 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 216 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. c. Special Requirement 3 - Flood protection facilities: If a proposed project contains or is adjacent to a stream that has an existing flood protection facility, such as a levee, revetment or berm, or proposes to either construct a new or modify an existing flood protection facility, then the flood protection facilities shall be analyzed and designed as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual to conform with the Federal Emergency Management Agency regulations as found in 44 C.F.R. d. Special Requirement 4: All commercial, industrial and multifamily projects (irrespective of size) undergoing drainage review are required to implement applicable source control in accordance with the King County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual and the Surface Water Design Manual. e. Special Requirement 5 - Oil control: If a proposed project is a high- use site, then oil control shall be applied to all runoff from the high-use portion of the site as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. f. Special Requirement 6 - Aquifer Protection Area (APA): If a proposed project is located within the APA as identified in RMC 4-3-050, then the project must comply with drainage requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual and RMC 4-3-050. F. REQUIREMENTS FOR DRAINAGE REVIEW: All persons applying for drainage review as specified in Subsection El of this Section shall submit to the Development Services Division all engineering plans for review in accordance with the Surface Water Design Manual. The drainage 21 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 217 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. plan and supportive calculation report(s) shall be stamped by a professional civil engineer registered and licensed in the State of Washington. G. ADOPTION OF STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MANUAL (SPPM): The 2009 King County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual (SPPM), as now or as hereafter may be amended by King County or the City of Renton, and hereby referred to as the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual, is hereby adopted by reference. One copy of the manual shall be filed with the City Clerk including any amendments thereto. H. DISCHARGE PROHIBITION: 1. Prohibition of Illicit Discharge: Materials, whether or not solids or liquids, other than surface water and stormwater shall not be spilled, leaked, emitted, discharged, disposed or allowed to escape into the storm sewer and/or drain system, surface water, groundwater, or watercourses. a. Examples of illicit discharge include but are not limited to the following: i. Trash, debris or garbage; ii. Construction materials or wastewater; iii. Petroleum products, including but not limited to oil, gasoline, greases, fuel oil or heating oil; iv. Antifreeze, brake fluid, windshield cleaner and other automotive products; 22 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 218 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. v. Metals in either particulate or dissolved form; vi. Flammable or explosive materials or substances; vii. Radioactive materials; viii. Acids or batteries of any kind; ix. Alkalis or bases; x. Paints, stains, resins, lacquers, or varnishes; xi. Degreasers, solvents or chemicals used in laundries or dry cleaners; xii. Drain cleaners; xiii. Pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers; xiv. Steam cleaning wastes; xv. Soaps, detergents, ammonias; xvi. Swimming pool and spa cleaning wastewater and filter backwash containing water disinfectants (chlorine, bromine, or other chemicals); xvii. Heated water; xviii. Domestic animal waste; xix. Sewage; xx. Recreational vehicle wastewater or sewage; xxi. Animal carcasses; xxii. Food waste; xxiii. Bark and other fibrous material; 23 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 219 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. xxiv. Collected lawn clippings, leaves, branches or other yard waste material; xxv. Silt, sediment or gravel; xxvi. Dyes; xxvii. Chemicals not normally found in uncontaminated water; xxviii. Wastewater or process water (including filtered or purified); xxix. Any pollution or contaminant as referenced in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual; and xxx. Any hazardous material as defined in RMC 4-11-080, or waste not listed above and any other process-associated discharge except as otherwise allowed in this Section. b. The following are examples of allowed discharges by this Section if the discharges do not contain pollutants and unless the Administrator evaluates and determines that they are causing an adverse impact: i. Diverted stream flows; ii. Spring water; iii. Rising groundwater; iv. Uncontaminated groundwater infiltration; v. Uncontaminated pumped groundwater; vi. Foundation or footing drains; vii. Water from crawl space pumps; viii. Air conditioning condensation; 24 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 220 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. ix. Flows from riparian habitat and wetland; x. Discharges from emergency fire fighting activities; xi. Discharges specified in writing by the authorized enforcement agency as being necessary to protect public health and safety; xii. Irrigation water from an agricultural source that is commingled with stormwater runoff; xiii. Storm system dye testing is allowable by the City, and any dye testing by others requires verbal notification to the Public Works Department at least one day prior to the date of the test. c. Activities that may result in illicit discharge, unless the application of Best Management Practices (BMPs) as specified in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual are utilized, include but are not limited to: i. Discharges from potable water sources, including water line flushing, hyperchlorinated water line flushing, fire hydrant system flushing, and pipeline hydrostatic test water. Planned discharges shall be dechlorinated to a concentration of 0.1 ppm or less, pH-adjusted, if necessary, and volumetrically and velocity controlled to prevent resuspension of sediments into the MS4; ii. Discharges from lawn watering and other irrigation runoff. These shall be minimized through, at a minimum, public education activities and water conservation efforts; iii. Dust control with potable water; iv. Automotive, airplane and boat washing; 25 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 221 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. v. Pavement and building washing; vi. Dechlorinated swimming pool discharges. The discharges shall be dechlorinated to a concentration of 0.1 ppm or less, pH-adjusted and reoxygenized if necessary, volumetrically and velocity controlled to prevent resuspension of sediments in the MS4; vii. Auto repair and maintenance; viii. Building repair and maintenance; ix. Landscape maintenance; x. Hazardous waste handling; xi. Solid and food waste handling; xii. Application of pesticides; xiii.Non-stormwater discharge permitted under another NPDES permit; provided that the discharge is in full compliance with all requirements of the permit, waiver, or other applicable requirements and regulations, d. A person does not violate this subsection G if: i. That person has properly designed, constructed, implemented and is maintaining BMPs as required by this Chapter and Section, but contaminants continue to enter surface and stormwater and underground water; ii. That person can demonstrate that there are no additional contaminants in discharges from the site above the background conditions of water entering the site; 26 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 222 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. iii. The discharge is a result of an emergency response activity or other action that must be undertaken immediately or within a time too short to allow full compliance with this Chapter or Section in order to avoid an imminent threat to public health or safety. The Administrator by public rule may specify actions that qualify for this exemption in City procedures. A person undertaking emergency response activities shall take steps to assure that the discharges resulting from such activities are minimized. In addition, this person shall evaluate BMPs to restrict recurrence. e. Any person who knowingly allows or permits any prohibited discharges, as set forth in this subsection G or the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual, through illicit connections, dumping, spills, improper maintenance of BMPs or other discharges, that allow contaminants to enter surface and stormwater or groundwater, shall be in violation of this Section. 2. Prohibition of Illicit Connections: The construction, use, maintenance or continued existence of any connection identified by the Administrator or designee, that may convey any pollution or contaminants or anything not composed entirely of surface water and stormwater, directly into the MS4, is prohibited, including without limitation, existing illicit connections regardless of whether the connection was permissible under law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of connection. 3. Remedy: 27 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 223 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. a. The person and/or property owner responsible for an illicit connection and/or illicit discharge shall initiate and complete all actions necessary to remedy the effects of such connection or discharge at no cost to the City. b. If the person responsible for an illicit connection or illicit discharge and/or the owner of the property on which the illicit connection or illicit discharge has occurred fails to address the illicit connection or illicit discharge in a timely manner, the Administrator or designee shall have the authority to implement removal or remedial actions following lawful entry upon the property. Such actions may include, but not be limited to: installation of monitoring wells; collection and laboratory testing of water, soil, and waste samples; cleanup and disposal of the illicit discharge, and remediation of soil and/or groundwater. The property owner and/or other person responsible for the release of an illicit discharge shall be responsible for any costs incurred by the Public Works Department or its authorized agents in the conduct of such remedial actions and shall be responsible for City expenses incurred due to the illicit connection or illicit discharge, including but not limited to removal and/or remedial actions in accordance with RMC 1-3-3. c. Compliance with this subsection G shall be achieved through the implementation and maintenance of best management practices (BMPs) described in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual. The Administrator or designee shall initially rely on education and informational assistance to gain 28 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 224 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. compliance with this subsection G, unless the Administrator or designee determines a violation poses a hazard to public health, safety, or welfare, endangers any property and/or other property owned or maintained by the City, and therefore should be addressed through immediate penalties. The Administrator or designee may demand immediate cessation of illicit discharges and assess penalties for violations that are an imminent or substantial danger to the health or welfare of persons or danger to the environment. 4. Elimination of Illicit Connection and/or Illicit Discharge: a. Notice of Violation: Whenever the Administrator or designee finds that a person has violated a prohibition or failed to meet a requirement of this Section, he or she may order compliance by written notice of violation to the property owner and/or responsible person, by first class and certified mail with return receipt requested. Such notice may require without limitation: i. The performance of monitoring, analyses, and reporting by the violator; ii. The elimination of illicit connections or discharges; iii. That violating discharges, practices, or operations shall immediately cease and desist; iv. The abatement or remediation of stormwater pollution or contamination hazards and the restoration of any affected property; and v. The implementation of source control or treatment BMPs. Any person responsible for a property or premises which is, or may be, the source of 29 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 225 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. an illicit discharge, may be required to implement, at said person's expense, additional structural and nonstructural BMPs to prevent the further discharge of pollutants to the municipal separate storm sewer system and/or waters of the State. These BMPs shall be part of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPP) as necessary for compliance with requirements of the NPDES permit. b. Requirement to Eliminate Illicit Connection: The Administrator or designee shall send a written notice, sent by first class and certified mail with return receipt requested to the property owner and/or the person responsible for the illicit connection, informing the property owner or person responsible for an illicit connection to the MS4 that the connection must be terminated by a specified date. c. Requirement to Eliminate Illicit Discharges: The Administrator or designee shall send a written notice, sent by first class and certified mail with return receipt requested to the property owner and/or the person responsible for the illicit discharge, informing the property owner or person responsible for an illicit discharge to the MS4, whether it be surface water and/or groundwater, that the discharge must be terminated by a specified date. d. Sample and Analysis: When the Administrator or designee has reason to believe that an illicit connection is resulting in an illicit discharge, the Administrator or designee may sample and analyze the discharge and recover the cost of such sampling and analysis from the property owner or person responsible for such illicit connection or discharge pursuant to RMC 1-3-3, as 30 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 226 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. now or as hereafter may be amended, and require the person permitting or maintaining the illicit connection and/or discharge to conduct ongoing monitoring at that person's expense. e. Right of Appeal from Administrative Decision: Any person aggrieved by an administrative decision of the Administrator or designee, may appeal such decision pursuant to RMC 4-8-110. f. Any illicit connection and/or illicit discharge as set forth in this Section or the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Manual is hereby declared to be a nuisance pursuant to RMC 1-3-3, and as defined in RMC l-3-4A.ll.c(23). 5. Reporting Requirements: a. In the event of an illicit discharge or spill of hazardous material into the stormwater drainage system or waters of the City, State of Washington or United States, said person with knowledge thereof shall immediately notify the emergency dispatch services (911). b. In the event of an illicit discharge of nonhazardous material into the stormwater drainage system or waters of the City, State of Washington or United States, said person with knowledge thereof shall immediately notify the Public Works Department by phone at 425-430-7400, or in person. 6. Inspections, Investigation and Sampling: The Administrator or designee may lawfully enter property to inspect the facilities of any person to determine compliance with the requirements of these regulations. a. Access: 31 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 227 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. i. The Administrator or shall be permitted to lawfully enter and inspect sites subject to regulation under this Chapter and Section as often as may be necessary to determine compliance herewith, at all reasonable hours for the purpose of inspections, sampling or records examination. ii. The Administrator or designee shall have the right to set up on the property necessary devices to conduct sampling, inspection, compliance monitoring, and/or metering actions. b. Compliance with Inspection Report: Within thirty (30) days of receiving an inspection report from the Public Works Department, the property owner or operator shall file with the Department a plan and time schedule to implement any required modifications to the site or to the monitoring plan needed to achieve compliance with the intent of this Chapter or Section or the NPDES permit conditions. This plan and time schedule shall also implement all of the recommendations of the Department. 7. All persons subject to the provisions of this Section shall retain and preserve for no less than three (3) years any records, books, documents, memoranda, reports, correspondence, and any and all summaries thereof, relating to operation, maintenance, monitoring, sampling, remedial actions and chemical analysis made by or on behalf of a person in connection with any illicit connection or illicit discharge. All records which pertain to matters which are the subject of administrative or any other enforcement or litigation activities brought by the City pursuant to this Code shall be retained and preserved by the 32 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 228 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. person until all enforcement activities have concluded and all periods of limitation with respect to any and all appeals have expired. I. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PLAN: 1. Process: All storm drainage plans and supportive calculations shall be prepared in connection with any of the permits and/or approvals listed in Subsection D of this Section shall be submitted for review and approval to the Development Services Division. 2. Fees: Fees shall be as listed in RMC 4-1-180B. 3. Additional Information: The permit application shall be supplemented by any plans, specifications or other information considered pertinent in the judgment of the Administrator or designee. 4. Tests: Whenever there is insufficient evidence of compliance with any of the provisions of this Section or Code, or evidence that any material or construction does not conform to the requirements of this Section or Code, the Administrator or designee may require tests as proof of compliance to be made at no expense to this jurisdiction. Test methods shall be as specified by this Section or Code or by other recognized test standards. If there are no recognized and accepted test methods for the proposed alternate, the Administrator or designee shall determine test procedures. Suitable performance of the method or material may be evidence of compliance meeting the testing requirement. J. BONDS AND LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIRED: 33 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 229 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. The Development Services Division shall require all persons constructing drainage facilities pursuant to RMC 4-6-030, except downspout infiltration and dispersion systems for single family residential lots to post with the City of Renton a surety, cash bonds, assignment of funds or certified check in the amount equal to the estimated cost of construction calculated using the Bond Quantity Worksheet as described in the Surface Water Design Manual. 1. Construction Bond: Prior to commencing construction, the person constructing the drainage facility shall post a construction bond in an amount sufficient to cover the cost of conforming said construction with the approved drainage plans. In lieu of a bond, the applicant may elect to establish a cash escrow account with his bank in an amount deemed by the City of Renton to be sufficient to reimburse the City if it should become necessary for the City to enter the property for the purpose of correcting and/or eliminating hazardous conditions relating to soil stability and/or erosion. The instructions to the escrowee shall specifically provide that after prior written notice unto the owner and his failure to correct and/or eliminate existing or potential hazardous conditions and his failure to timely remedy same, the escrowee shall be authorized without any further notice to the owner or his consent to disburse the necessary funds to the City of Renton for the purpose of correcting and/or eliminating such conditions complained of. After determination by the Department that all facilities are constructed in compliance with the approved plans, the construction bond shall be released. 34 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 230 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 2. Maintenance Bond: After satisfactory completion of the facilities and release of the construction bond by the City, the person constructing the facility shall commence a two (2) year period of satisfactory maintenance of the facility. A cash bond, surety bond or bona fide contract for maintenance with a third party for the duration of this two (2) year period, to be approved by the City of Renton and to be used at the discretion of the City of Renton to correct deficiencies in said maintenance affecting public health, safety and welfare, must be posted and maintained throughout the two (2) year maintenance period. The amount of the cash bond or surety bond shall be in the amount equal to 20% of the estimated cost of construction for a two (2) year period calculated using the Bond Quantity worksheet as described in the Surface Water Design Manual. 3. Liability Policy: Before a permit shall be issued for any construction, insurance will be required as follows: a. The applicant shall secure and maintain in force throughout the duration of the permit Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence/two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate. b. Copies of such insurance policy or policies shall be furnished unto the City with a special endorsement in favor of the City with the City named as a primary and noncontributory additional insured on the insurance policy and an endorsement stating such shall be provided to the City. 35 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 231 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. c. The policy shall provide that it will not be canceled or reduced without 30 days- advanced written notice to the City. d. Upon showing of a hardship and at the discretion of the Administrator or designee, the insurance requirements may be reduced or waived for single-family or two-family residential applications. K. CITY ASSUMPTION OF MAINTENANCE: 1. Maintenance of Facilities by City Authorized: The City of Renton is authorized to assume the maintenance of flow control and water quality treatment facilities after the expiration of the two (2) year maintenance period in connection with the subdivision of land if: a. All of the requirements of Subsection E of this Section have been fully complied with; b. The facilities have been inspected and any defects or repairs have been corrected and approved by the Department prior to the end of the two (2) year maintenance period; c. All necessary easements entitling the City to properly maintain the facility have been conveyed to the City; and d. It is recommended by the Administrator and concurred in by the City Council that said assumption of maintenance would be in the best interests of the City. 2. Notification of Defect Required: The owner of said property shall throughout the maintenance period notify the City in writing if any defect or 36 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 232 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. improper working of the drainage system has come to his or her notice. Failure to so notify the City shall give the City cause to reject assumption of the maintenance of the facility at the expiration of the two (2) year maintenance period, or within one year of the discovery of the defect or improper working of the drainage system, whichever period is the latest in time. 3. Conveyance systems to be maintained and operated by the City must be located in a drainage easement, tract, or right-of-way granted to City. Offsite areas that naturally drain onto the project site must be intercepted at the natural drainage course within the project site and conveyed in a separate conveyance system and must bypass onsite stormwater facilities. Separate conveyance systems that intercept offsite runoff and are located on private property must be located in a drainage easement that may be dedicated to the City if the City deems it appropriate depending on the upstream tributary area. L. RETROACTIVITY RELATING TO CITY MAINTENANCE OF SUBDIVISION FACILITIES: If any person constructing drainage facilities pursuant to this Section and/or receiving approval of drainage plans prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Section reassesses the facilities and/or plans so constructed and/or approved and demonstrates, to the Administrator's satisfaction, total compliance with the requirements of this Section, the City may, after inspection, approval and acknowledgment of the proper posting of the required bonds as specified in Subsection M of this Section, assume maintenance of the facilities. 37 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 233 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. M. ADJUSTMENT: 1. An adjustment to the requirements contained in this Section or other requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual may be proposed. The resulting development shall be subject to all of the remaining terms and conditions of this section and the adjustment shall: a. Produce a compensating or comparable result in the public interest; and b. Meet the objectives contained in this Section of safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability based upon sound engineering judgment. 2. Requests for adjustments that may conflict with the requirements of any other City departments shall require review and concurrence with that department. 3. A request for an adjustment shall be processed in accordance with the procedures specified in the Surface Water Design Manual. 4. The applicant may appeal an adjustment decision by following the appeal procedures as specified in the Surface Water Design Manual per RMC 4-8-110. N. VARIANCE: 1. If complying with Subsection E2 will deny all reasonable use of a property, a variance to the requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual may be requested te—from the Community and Economic Development 38 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 234 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. Administrator or designee in accordance with the variance process defined in the Surface Water Design Manual and RMC 4-9-250. 2. A request for a variance shall be processed in accordance with RMC 4-9- 250. O. SEVERABILITY: If any provision, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Section or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remaining portions of this Section and the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. P. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES: A violation of any of the provisions of this Section shall be a civil infraction upon the first offense pursuant to RMC 1-3-2. See also RMC 4-6-110. SECTION XVIII. Subsection 4-8-120D.4, Definitions D, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definitions of "Drainage Plan/Map" and "Drainage Report" read as follows: Drainage Plan/Map: Plans drawn to scale and stamped by a State of Washington licensed engineer and complying with the requirements of RMC 4-6- 030, Drainage (Surface Water) Standards, and the Surface Water Design Manual. Drainage Report: A report stamped by a State of Washington licensed engineer complying with the requirements of the City of Renton Drafting 39 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 235 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. Standards, RMC 4-6-030, Drainage (Surface Water) Standards, and the Surface Water Design Manual. SECTION XIX. Subsection 4-8-120D.5, Definitions E, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Erosion Control Plan, Temporary", reads as follows: Erosion Control Plan, Temporary: Drawings of the entire site showing the proposed erosion control measures for the project in conformance with the City of Renton drafting standards and the Surface Water Design Manual. SECTION XX. Subsection 4-9-250B.1, Authority and Applicability for Administrative Variances, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection d, entitled "Proposals to vary from the Drainage Standards", to read as follows: d. Proposals to vary from the Drainage Standards: If an applicant feels that the application of the regulations in the Surface Water Design Manual would deny all reasonable use of the property, the applicant of a development proposal may apply for a variance. SECTION XXI. Subsection 4-9-250B, Variance Procedures, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 12, 40 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 236 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. entitled "Review Criteria", to read as shown below. The current subsections 12-17 shall be renumbered accordingly. 12. Special Review Criteria: In lieu of the variance criteria of Subsection B6 of this Section, applications proposing to alter the core and special requirements described in the Surface Water Design Manual shall be reviewed for compliance with all of the following criteria: a. There are special physical circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that strict application of the criteria for producing a compensating or comparable result would deprive the applicant of all reasonable use of the parcel of land in question, and every effort has been made to find creative ways to meet the intent of the requirement for which the variance is sought; b. Granting the variance for the individual property in question will not create a significant adverse impact to public health, welfare, water quality, and properties downstream or nearby; c. The variance requires the best practicable alternative for achieving the spirit and intent of the requirement in question; and d. In addition, the application must include the following information as required by the state Department of Ecology per the 2007 Phase II NPDES General Municipal Stormwater Permit: i. The current (pre-project) use of the site. ii. How application of the requirements in the Surface Water Design Manual for which a variance is being requested denies all reasonable use of site 41 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 237 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. compared to the development review conditions and restrictions that would have been placed on the project prior to the adoption of the Surface Water Design Manual. iii. The possible remaining uses of the site if the variance was not granted; and iv. The uses of the site that would have been allowed under development review conditions and restrictions that would have been placed on the project prior to the adoption of the Surface Water Design Manual. v. A comparison of the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of the requirements of this manual versus the estimated amount and percentage of value loss as a result of conditions and/or restrictions that would have been placed on the project prior to the adoption of the Surface Water Design Manual. vi. The feasibility for the owner to alter the project to apply the requirements of this manual. SECTION XXII. Section 4-11-190, Definitions S, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a definition for "Surface Water Design Manual", to read as follows: SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL: Shall be the King County Surface Water Design Manual, as now or as hereafter may be amended by King County, (and supporting documents as appropriate) prepared by King County Department of 42 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 238 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. Natural Resources and Parks or its successor organization, and as may be amended, supplemented and modified by the City of Renton Amendments to the King County Surface Water Design Manual that specifies local requirements and procedures describing surface and stormwater design and analysis requirements procedures and guidance. SECTION XXIII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1615:l/15/10:scr 43 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 239 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 4-2-110A Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures) Maximum Building Coverage (Including primary and accessory buildings. Except Accessory Dwelling Units are not counted toward building coverage) RC R-l R-4 and R-8 R-10 and R-14 RM Lots 5 acres or more: 2%. An additional 5% of the total area may be used for agricultural buildings. Lots 10,000 sq ft to 5 acres: 15%. On lots greater than 1 acre, an additional 5% of the total area may be used for agricultural buildings. Lots 10,000 sq ft or less: 35%. 20% Lots greater than 5,000 sq ft: 35% or 2,500 sq ft, whichever is greater. Lots 5,000 sq ft or less: 50% n/a "U" suffix: 75% "T" suffix: 75% "F" suffix: 35% A maximum coverage of 45% may be obtained through the Hearing Examiner site development plan review process. Attachment A 7 c .   ‐   2 0 0 9   K i n g   C o u n t y   S u r f a c e   W a t e r   D e s i g n   M a n u a l   a d o p t i o n   ( S e e   6 . d . ) P a g e 2 4 0 o f 2 4 4 ORDINANCE NO. 4-2-110A Development Standards for Residential Zoning Designations (Primary and Attached Accessory Structures) Maximum Impervious Surface Area RC R-l R-4 R-8 R-10 R-14 RM Lots 5 acres or more: 20% Lots 10,000 sq ft: 55%. For each additional 10,000 sq ft increase in lot size, the impervious coverage shall be decreased by 1.75% to a minimum of 20% for a 5 acre lot Lots 10,000 sq ft or less: 55% 30% 55% 75% Detached units: 75% Attached units: 65% 85% "U" and "T" suffixes: 85%. All other suffixes: 75% Attachment B 7 c .   ‐   2 0 0 9   K i n g   C o u n t y   S u r f a c e   W a t e r   D e s i g n   M a n u a l   a d o p t i o n   ( S e e   6 . d . ) P a g e 2 4 1 o f 2 4 4 ORDINANCE NO. 4-3-050C.5d.ii. New or Modified Regional Stormwater Facilities is hereby amended to read as follows: ii. New or Modified Regional Stormwater Facilities: Regional stormwater management facilities to be operated and maintained under the direction of the City Surface Water Utility that are proposed and designed consistent with the Washington State Department of Ecology Wetlands and Stormwater Management Guidelines or meeting equivalent objectives. X Attachment C 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 242 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 4-3-050C.7.ii, Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities in Buffer, is amended to read as follows: ii. Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities in Buffer: Stormwater management facilities shall not be built within a critical area buffer except as allowed in Reference 5, Wetlands Protection Guidelines of the City's Surface Water Design Manual and shall require buffer enhancement or buffer averaging when they are sited in areas of forest vegetation, provided the standard buffer zone area associated with the critical area classification is retained pursuant to subsection L or M6c of this Section, and is sited to reduce impacts between the critical area and surrounding activities. X Attachment D 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 243 of 244 ORDINANCE NO. 4-3-050C.7.a is amended to add a new subsection iii, to read as follows: iii. Stormwater Conveyance in Buffer: Necessary conveyance systems including stormwater dispersion outfall systems designed to minimize impacts to the buffer and critical area, where the site topography requires their location within the buffer to allow hydraulic function, provided the standard buffer zone area associated with the critical area classification is retained pursuant to subsection L or M6c of this Section, and is sited to reduce impacts between the critical area and surrounding activities. X X X Attachment E 7c. ‐ 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual adoption (See 6.d.) Page 244 of 244