HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 04/12/2010AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
April 12, 2010
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.PROCLAMATIONS
a. Week of the Young Child ‐ April 11 to 17, 2010
b. Arbor Day/Earth Day ‐ April 24, 2010
4.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
5.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The
comment period will be limited to one‐half hour. The second audience comment period later on in
the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please
walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST
NAME.
6.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeeting minutes of 4/5/2010. Council concur.
b. City Clerk submits request for partial release of easement by April Pust, PACLAND, 1505
Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 305, Seattle, 98109, for approximately 4,289 square feet of property
located at 743 Rainier Ave. S.
Refer to Utilities Committee.
c. City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Cavalla Preliminary Plat
by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required fee. Consideration of the appeal by the City Council
shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and
additional submissions by parties (RMC 4‐8‐110.F.6.).
Refer to Planning and Development Committee.
d. Community and Economic Development Department reports submission of grant applications
for the 2010 Neighborhood Grant Program and recommends funding nine projects and seven
newsletters totaling $74,357, and authorizing a second round of funding with a deadline of
10/9/2010.
Refer to Community Services Committee.
e. Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of the carry‐forward ordinance
in the amount of $37,020,458, which increases the 2010 Budget by carrying forward funds
from 2009 for projects that were not completed in 2009.
Refer to Finance Committee.
Page 1 of 184
f. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with Parametrix, Inc., in the
amount of $125,356 for designs services related to the Thunder Hills Creek Sanitary Sewer and
Surface Water project. Council concur.
7.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held
by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: Renaming of Courtroom #1; Library Advisory Board*
b. Planning & Development Committee: Cascade Agenda Cities Program Membership*; City
Center Community Plan
8.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolution:
a. Cascade Agenda Cities Program Membership (See 7.b.)
Ordinance for first reading:
a. Creating a Library Advisory Board (See 7.a.)
9.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.)
10.AUDIENCE COMMENT
11.ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
April 12, 2010
Monday, 6:00 p.m.
Shoreline Master Program Update
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:
Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM
Page 2 of 184
3a. ‐ Week of the Young Child ‐ April 11 to 17, 2010
Page 3 of 184
3b. ‐ Arbor Day/Earth Day ‐ April 24, 2010
Page 4 of 184
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Application for Partial Release of Utilities
Easement by April Pust, PACLAND, for
approximately 4,289 sq. ft. located in the area of
743 Rainier Ave. S. (File RE-10-001)
Meeting:
Regular Council - 12 Apr 2010
Exhibits:
Application, including legal description & map
Utilities Easement 6111601
Draft Partial Release of Easement
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
Recommended Action:
Refer to Utilities Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On February 25, 2010, April Pust of PACLAND, 1505 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 305, Seattle, 98109,
filed an application for partial release of perpetual easement containing approximately 4,289 sq.
ft. and located in the area of 743 Rainier Ave. S. (Walmart) The easement was granted by the
City in 1966 and was recorded under King County Recording No. 6111601. An application filing
fee of $250 has been paid.
The property services section of the Development Services Division has since reviewed the
Application for Partial Release of Easement, and determined that the release of easement
petition is valid and the legal description is accurate.
ACTION NEEDED:
Determine whether the release of easement proposal should be granted, the classification of
the easement, whether there are conditions of the approval, and whether an appraisal is
necessary to determine the amount of compensation to be paid, if any, and
If so approved, adoption of an ordinance to finalize the release if all determinations have been
made and all conditions have been met within 90 days of Council approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Determine partial release of utilites easement request as presented.
6b. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of easement by April
Pust, PACLAND, 1505 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 305, Seattle, 98109, for Page 5 of 184
6b. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of easement by April
Pust, PACLAND, 1505 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 305, Seattle, 98109, for Page 6 of 184
6b. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of easement by April
Pust, PACLAND, 1505 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 305, Seattle, 98109, for Page 7 of 184
6b. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of easement by April
Pust, PACLAND, 1505 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 305, Seattle, 98109, for Page 8 of 184
6b. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of easement by April
Pust, PACLAND, 1505 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 305, Seattle, 98109, for Page 9 of 184
6b. ‐ City Clerk submits request for partial release of easement by April
Pust, PACLAND, 1505 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 305, Seattle, 98109, for Page 10 of 184
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat application, 9.40
acres located at 162nd Av SE & SE 137th Pl. (File
No. LUA-08-097 PP, ECF)
Meeting:
Regular Council - 12 Apr 2010
Exhibits:
City Clerk's letters (3/24/2010 & 3/31/2010)
2nd Hearing Examiner's Decision (3/1/2010)
Five Requests for Reconsiderations on Re-opened
Hearing
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
Recommended Action:
Refer to Planning and Development Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
EXHIBITS CONTINUED:
Appeal filed by Dave Petrie (11/17/2009)
Requests for Reconsideration filed by City of Renton (11/17/2009) & Dave Petrie (11/17/2009)
Hearing Examiner's Decision (11/3/2009)
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Appeal of the Hearing Examiner’s decision on the Cavalla Preliminary Plat, 9.40 acres located at 162nd
Av SE & SE 137th Pl, was filed on November 17, 2009 by Dave Petrie, accompanied by the required $250
fee.
Preliminary Plat Applicant/Contact: Wayne Potter, Barghausen Consulting Engineer
Preliminary Plat Owner: Kolin B. Taylor, KBS III, LLC.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Take action on the Cavalla Preliminary Plat appeal and plat approval
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 11 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 12 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 13 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 14 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 15 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 16 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 17 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 18 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 19 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 20 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 21 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 22 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 23 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 24 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 25 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 26 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 27 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 28 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 29 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 30 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 31 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 32 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 33 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 34 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 35 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 36 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 37 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 38 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 39 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 40 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 41 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 42 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 43 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 44 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 45 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 46 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 47 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 48 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 49 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 50 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 51 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 52 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 53 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 54 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 55 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 56 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 57 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 58 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 59 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 60 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 61 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 62 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 63 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 64 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 65 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 66 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 67 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 68 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 69 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 70 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 71 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 72 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 73 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 74 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 75 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 76 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 77 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 78 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 79 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 80 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 81 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 82 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 83 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 84 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 85 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 86 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 87 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 88 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 89 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 90 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 91 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 92 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 93 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 94 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 95 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 96 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 97 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 98 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 99 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 100 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 101 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 102 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 103 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 104 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 105 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 106 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 107 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 108 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 109 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 110 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 111 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 112 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 113 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 114 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 115 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 116 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 117 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 118 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 119 of 184
6c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
the Cavalla Preliminary Plat by Dave Petrie, accompanied by required Page 120 of 184
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
First Round of 2010 Neighborhood Grants
Meeting:
Regular Council - 12 Apr 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community and Economic Development
Staff Contact:
Norma McQuiller (x6595)
Recommended Action:
Refer to Community Services Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $74,357 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $83,000 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ $74,357 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Nine project applications and seven newsletter applications were submitted for the first round of neighborhood
grant funding. Staff evaluated each request against established criteria. Nine projects and seven newsletter
grants are recommended for funding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve nine 2010 Neighborhood Program project applications and seven newsletter applications totaling
$74,357. Authorize a second 2010 application round of funding ending in October 9, 2010.
6d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department reports
submission of grant applications for the 2010 Neighborhood Grant Page 121 of 184
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:April 12, 2010
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Alex Pietsch, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Norma McQuiller, Neighborhood Program Coordinator (x6595)
SUBJECT:2010 First Round Neighborhood Grant Applications
ISSUE:
Do the sixteen grant applications submitted, which includes seven newsletter grants, comply with
the City of Renton’s Neighborhood Program objectives and should they be approved?
RECOMMENDATION:
The Administration recommends approval of nine projects and seven newsletter applications,
totaling $74,357, and authorization of a second 2010 application round ending on October 8,
2010.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The City Council appropriated $83,000 in the 2010 Capital Improvement Program budget for the
Neighborhood Grant Program. The grant applications received in this round are shown in the
following table. A more detailed summary of projects is attached.
The following criteria were used to evaluate projects to determine if the objectives of the
Neighborhood Program are met:
§Project size, location, and complexity are appropriate for the neighborhood group, with a
realistic budget.
§Documentation shows neighborhood participation and adequate volunteer labor
reflecting community support for the project and includes maintenance after project
completion.
§Physical improvements are visible and benefit a large area of a community.
§Demonstrated networking, self-help, and neighborhood organization.
§Sufficient matching funds exist through volunteer labor, cash, or donated
labor/materials.
6d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department reports
submission of grant applications for the 2010 Neighborhood Grant Page 122 of 184
§
Of the nine project grant applications, the interdepartmental Grant Review Team recommended
all nine be funded based on the above criteria.
Neighborhood Requested
Amount
Recommended
Amount
Project Grant Applications
Clover Creek Homeowners Association $2,310 $2,310
Ellis Park Homeowners Association $9,679 $9,679
Falcon Ridge Homeowners Association $15,767 $15,767
Maplewood Neighborhood Association $7,840 $7,840
May Creek Homeowners Association $210 $210
Rolling Hill Homeowners Association $5,558 $5,558
Stonegate Homeowners Association $20,650 $20,650
Summerwind Homeowners Association $8,008 $8,008
Windwood Homeowners Association $400 $400
Newsletter/Administrative Grants
Earlington Neighborhood Association $440 $440
Honey Creek Homeowners Association $103 $103
Rolling Hills Homeowners Association $300 $300
Sunset Neighborhood Association $2,350 $2,350
Tiffany Park Homeowners Association $89 $89
Tiffany Park Neighborhood Association $506 $506
Victoria Hills Homeowners Association $141 $141
Total $74,357.00 $74,357.00
Note: The above amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar.
CONCLUSION:
The Neighborhood Grant Program continues to provide neighborhood associations with
opportunities to improve their community and get to know their neighbors better.
cc: Suzanne Dale Estey
6d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department reports
submission of grant applications for the 2010 Neighborhood Grant Page 123 of 184
6d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department reports
submission of grant applications for the 2010 Neighborhood Grant Page 124 of 184
Neighborhood Grant
Request
Total
Project
Cost
Project Description Meets objective of
Neighborhood Program
Clover Creek
Homeowners
Association
$2,310 $4,620 Complete restoration of the
neighborhood common area
by planting native vegetation
and bark.
Yes
Project would enhance
appearance as well as add a
relaxed atmosphere for
residents and others driving
through the area. Staff would
recommend different trees
other than staghern sumas.
Recommend using dogwood,
cedar or Douglas fir trees.
Ellis Park
Homeowners
Association
$9,679 $19,358 Implement an entrance
sign and landscape at
entrance, retention pond
and children’s park.
Yes
Project will enhance the
entrance into the
neighborhood and beautify the
area.
Must “Call before you dig” 2
days in advance (811)
Falcon Ridge
Homeowners
Association
$15,767 $31,534 Expand play area with
addition play equipment,
timbers, and wood chips.
Yes
Project will comply with the
U.S. Consumer Products
Safety Commission.
Must “Call before you dig”
(811) 2 days in advance.
Maplewood
Neighborhood
Association
$7,840 $15,680 Install an entrance sign
into the neighborhood,
located on Hwy. 169 &
134th Ave SE.
Yes
Sight distance study was
completed and sign will not
block sight distance or
interfere with the effectiveness
of official traffic control
devices.
May Creek
Homeowners
Association
$210 $420 Project consists of painting
existing mailbox kiosk
located within the
neighborhood.
Yes
Project would improve
aesthetics of the area.
The interdepartmental review
team recommended approving
the amount of $210, the cost
of materials needed to
complete the project, rather
than the $104 which was
applied for. The
neighborhood volunteers more
than meet their match which
equates to $904 in sweat
equity.
6d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department reports
submission of grant applications for the 2010 Neighborhood Grant Page 125 of 184
Rolling Hills
Homeowners
Association
$5,558 $11,116 Project consists of
upgrading and expanding
the children’s park by
adding play structures and
two park benches.
Yes
Project would enhance the
existing community park and
will give a safer place for
children to play. It will also
offer a relaxed atmosphere for
parents to socialize with other
members of the community.
“Call before your dig” (811) 2
days in advance.
Summerwind
Homeowners
Association
$8,008 $16,016 Project includes creating a
community garden, located
in an undeveloped
neighborhood common
area. Surplus produce will
be donated to local food
banks. The project would
serve the neighborhood
and community.
Yes
Staff recommends approval of the
project at the funding requested.
However, staff recommends
against installation of the parking
on NE 20th Place as the location
shown may interfere with
emergency access via the long
driveway serving one or more
homes to the east. There is
parking available in the Field
Avenue cul-de-sac and on the
paved portions of NE 20th Place.
Access to the proposed garden
would be by a proposed path and
delivery access is still available
from the adjacent gravel
driveway, but no parking except
for occasional off-loading of
material should be allowed.
Private signage or notice to the
homeowners may be provided by
Summerwind HOA advising
“loading zone only” along the
edge of Tract A if the use
generates complaints.
Stonegate
Homeowners
Association
$20,650 $41,300 Project consists of creating
a small playground and
installing a play structure,
benches, picnic table, bike
rack, waste receptacles and
fencing. The proposed site
is owned by the HOA, next
to City right of way, which
is not allowed for
development use.
Yes
Staff recommends approval of the
project at the funding requested.
A redesign is needed to include
safety fences and modifying size
and location of the play
equipment to maintain safe use of
the proposed play area and the
paved vehicular access on this
site. Further, staff recommends
landscaping only on the narrow
triangle to the east of the access
easement.
6d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department reports
submission of grant applications for the 2010 Neighborhood Grant Page 126 of 184
NEWSLETTER GRANTS
Earlington
Neighborhood
Association
$440 N/A Annual costs for a newsletter
printed quarterly and
distributed door-to-door and
by USPS.
Yes
Honey Creek
Homeowners
Association
$103 N/A Annual costs for a newsletter
printed and distributed
door-to-door twice a year.
Yes
Rolling Hills Village
Homeowners
Association
$300 N/A Annual costs for a newsletter
printed monthly and distributed
door-to-door and by USPS.
Yes
Sunset
Neighborhood
Association
$2,350 N/A Annual costs for a newsletter
printed once a year and
distributed door-to-door and
by USPS.
Yes
Tiffany Park
Homeowners
Association
$89 N/A Annual costs for a newsletter
printed and distributed once a
year by USPS.
Yes
Tiffany Park
Neighborhood
Association
$506 N/A Annual costs for a newsletter
printed and distributed
door-to-door quarterly.
Yes
Victoria Hills
Homeowners
Association
$141 N/A Annual costs for a newsletter
printed quarterly and
distributed by USPS.
Yes
6d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department reports
submission of grant applications for the 2010 Neighborhood Grant Page 127 of 184
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2010 Carry Forward Budget Amendment
Ordinance
Meeting:
Regular Council - 12 Apr 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
2010 1st Qrtr Budget Adjustment Detail
Draft Ordinance
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Finance & Information Services
Staff Contact:
Iwen Wang, Administrator
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 37,020,458 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The proposed budget amendment increases the overall City budget appropriation by $37.0 million, and:
1) Carry forward funds appropriated in 2009, but not expended in 2009;
2) Makes minor corrections to 2010 adopted budget;
3) Recognizes grants, contributions, and associated costs; and
4) Provides for new cost items in the 2010 budget to cover necessary expenditures that were not
anticipated in the adopted budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the proposed 2010 Carry Forward Amendment
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 128 of 184
!
"# $%& %!
' #& (% ) %
!" #!$ #!$" %$ $&!
* ) % % % ) % % &+
% % ) , ) -
'
% . % % % % /01- !2 ) % ) / -3
4 % 4 5 % ' % /0 - % % % ) % % ) )
&-
!$! ( )! $#!$" ( * +"#!$"+
4 % 4 5 % % 6 & /0-7 ) ) % % -
%5 % % % % / - 5 % ) %
% % 8 / -7 9 ) 8 % ! / 33: & ) %
5 -
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 129 of 184
% . & % /1 ;: 5 ) % % % % %5 %&%
! 5 68 / - 9 ) ! ) % < %
5 - %5 / -6 % % %)% & / - % % : %
% %5 ) / -; = ) % > % -
/ - 9 % . /30 : ! ) % < 5 8 / 3:
. % % % ? @ A %5 5 ! % 5 ! !
- ,! $( !-&!."% $ /$! 0 %"!# %+ 1 2 +!" +% ! " & )! %"% $ ( 3 $4%$ 5!!+ ! "
",! ( ! $%$ "!+ $ ",! ( ! 3 ( $&! ",! %" %+ 4!!.%$ %$ ",! &,!&4%$ && $" 3 %$)!+"%$
& +, " ,% ,! !" $+ !(+! ,! !6
",! $ +
% ! % & % ! &% /0 - % ! ! % % .
) / 6- % ) % % ) % 5 % . -
! B % % . 9 %
1. ) * C ) , ' ? 6A % % ) % % /16 0;
4 % 4 5 % , ' ? A-
2. % ! ) ! / 6;: /;;: % / :
% % - % ) & &% < & < % &%
) 5 -
%"% $ ( " ", %7! 8 +%"% $+
D : ! % % ! &% ) % . ) % . & % &
% % @ - % ) % % -
1. ' ,4 C ) % ) % - % ) '%
% &% 5 C % * 5 ) % ? ! 4 % ' A
,4 ) % - B % ) % ) % E % !
% ! ,4 - &%
& % % % ) % & ) % % )
,4 F% % ! % - ,4 ) !
%5% % % % % -
2. # % )! % @ - ! %
) % 5 % ! 5 % ! % % )
% @ - ( % 5 % !
) & % ) % ! -
% ! &% ) % & 5 . ! % 8
& %: % ) 8 % % ) % & % % %
- * % % 5 % . -
% , ) % % %
% ! ' &% , ) %
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 130 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 1/10
GENERAL FUND (Fund 000)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 8,363,429 3,591,856 11,955,285
REVENUES 97,838,698
CED Small Business Development Center-WA ST CTED Grant 33,406
CED Shoreline Master Plan-WA ST DOE Grant 56,906
CED Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants 95,837
Court Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) 4,968
CS Senior Center Fitness Room Attendant/Supplies 13,058
CS CDBG Housing Repair 86,930
CS CDBG LED Light project 151,557
Fire Homeland Security Sub Grant 81,750
FIT Transfer in remaining Fund 219 fund balance to Fund 215 79,340
Police Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) 48,890
PW Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants - ARRA 51,608
Total Revenue Adjustment 97,838,698 704,250 98,542,947
EXPENDITURES 97,838,698
CED Small Business Development Center-WA ST CTED Grant 33,406
CED Shoreline Master Plan-CAG-08-029 Parametrix 2,030
CED City Impact Fee Study-CAG-09-039 53,740
CED City Center Community Plan-CAG-09-121 6,128
CED Neighborhood Picknic food and supplies 12,000
CED Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants 95,837
CED Dangerous Structure Abatement Fund 50,000
CED Professional Services - Aero-Metric 100,000
Court Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) 4,968
CS CDBG ISF charges to Human Services 2,763
CS Human Services professional services 2,500
CS CLASS upgrade to 7.0-RCC 11,779
CS Intergovernmental Services Lindberg Pool 40,000
CS Riverview Bridge Deck 2009 Flood Repairs 13,140
CS Seahawks Donation-Bleacher Repairs 1,500
CS Senior Center Fitness Room Attendant/Supplies 13,058
CS Special Events Trailer purchase 20,000
CS SR Center Fitness Room Attendant 7,663
CS CDBG Housing Repair Supplies 5,315
CS CDBG ISF charges to Human Services (2,763)
CS CDBG LED Light project 151,557
CS New CDBG position-Facilities Technician I (+1.0 FTE) 81,615
Fire 2009 EMPG Grnat related expense not yet complete 38,150
Fire Small Tools and Equipment Fire 81,750
FIT Projected 2010 City-Wide Bank Fees 200,000
HR Transfer Employee Recognition Event 4,500
Police Federal narcotic seizure money 161,614
Police State narcotic seizure money 178,485
Police Youth Self Sustaining program contributions only 22,758
Police Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) 48,890
PW Pager budget was not included in 2010 original budget due to error 1,994
PW Conference Room Completion 12,556
PW Led Lights/Signal Upgrades - ARRA Grant 51,608
Total Expenditure Adjustment 97,838,698 1,508,541 99,347,239
Ending Fund Balance 8,363,429 2,787,565 11,150,993
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 131 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 2/10
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (Fund 102)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 261,306 (60,620) 200,686
Total Revenue Adjustment 620,000 - 620,000
EXPENDITURES 620,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 620,000 - 620,000
Ending Fund Balance 261,306 (60,620) 200,686
LEASED FACILITIES FUND (Fund 108)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 615,151 222,462 837,613
REVENUES 941,533
CS Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants 470,065
CS Puget Sound Energy Grant 257,988
Total Revenue Adjustment 941,533 728,053 1,669,586
EXPENDITURES 581,940
CS Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants 470,065
CS Leased Facilities 201,568
CS Puget Sound Energy Grant 257,988
Total Expenditure Adjustment 581,940 929,621 1,511,561
Ending Fund Balance 974,744 20,894 995,638
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX (Fund 110)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 265,146 (17,318) 247,828
REVENUES 245,000
Total Revenue Adjustment 245,000 - 245,000
EXPENDITURES 245,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 245,000 - 245,000
Ending Fund Balance 265,146 (17,318) 247,828
PATH & TRAIL FUEL TAX (Fund 118)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 3,243 21 3,264
REVENUES -
Total Revenue Adjustment - - -
EXPENDITURES -
Total Expenditure Adjustment - - -
Ending Fund Balance 3,243 21 3,264
ONE PERCENT FOR ARTS (Fund 125)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 121,678 22,118 143,796
REVENUES 15,000
CED 318's portion of 1% for Arts Program 5,000
CED Transfer in from Transportation CIP for Arts Program 15,000
Total Revenue Adjustment 15,000 20,000 35,000
EXPENDITURES 50,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 50,000 - 50,000
Ending Fund Balance 86,678 42,118 128,796
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 132 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 3/10
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS (Fund 127)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 112,369 (22,978) 89,391
REVENUES 85,000
Total Revenue Adjustment 85,000 - 85,000
EXPENDITURES 85,674
Total Expenditure Adjustment 85,674 - 85,674
Ending Fund Balance 111,695 (22,978) 88,717
SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS BANK (Fund 135)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 19,002 440,526 459,528
REVENUES -
Total Revenue Adjustment - - -
EXPENDITURES -
Total Expenditure Adjustment - - -
Ending Fund Balance 19,002 440,526 459,528
SENIOR HOUSING BOND FUND (Fund 219)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance (22,013) 101,353 79,340
REVENUES -
Total Revenue Adjustment - - -
EXPENDITURES 1,388
FIT Transfer out remaining fund balance to Fund 215 77,952
Total Expenditure Adjustment 1,388 77,952 79,340
Ending Fund Balance (23,401) 23,401 -
IMPACT MITIGATION FUNDS (Fund 303, 304, 305)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 5,078,256 518,992 5,597,248
REVENUES 360,000
Total Revenue Adjustment 360,000 - 360,000
EXPENDITURES 1,260,000
PW Garden Ave - Transfer from Mitigation TIP No 8 500,000
PW 3rd and Shattuck - Transfer from Mitigation 150,000
PW Rainier Ave S - Transfer from Mitigation TIP No 3 379,000
PW Lake WA Trail - Transfer from Mitigation TIP No 15 81,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 1,260,000 1,110,000 2,370,000
Ending Fund Balance 4,178,256 (591,008) 3,587,248
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 133 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 4/10
MUNICIPAL CIP FUND (Fund 316)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 1,198,463 5,734,723 6,933,186
REVENUES 730,000
CS May Creek/Hawks Landing Acquisition-Public Works Board Grant 500,000
CS Senior Center Fitness Room Attendant/Supplies 3,553
CS FEMA Grant related to Fire Station 11 100,000
Total Revenue Adjustment 730,000 603,553 1,333,553
EXPENDITURES 1,653,454
CED Highlands Subarea Long Range Plan 49,518
CED South Lake Washington Redevelopment 33,000
CED Transfer out to Transportation CIP for Highlands Sidewalk Rehab 100,000
CED Sunset Area sidewalk repairs 150,000
CED Sunset Blvd NE Corridor design 240,000
CED Storm Water Facility feasibilty/preliminary design 200,000
CS Citywide Exercise Equipment Replacement 47,000
CS City Hall 39,835
CS Coulon Structure Maintenance 30,000
CS Fire Station 11 57,052
CS Fire Station 12 23,103
CS HMAC - Pool Drain Project 85,218
CS King County Proposition 2 Levy Fund 284,186
CS May Creek/Hawks Landing Acquisition-Public Works Board Grant 496,500
CS New Parks Maintenance Building 1,104,235
CS Off Leash Dog Park Development 30,294
CS Park MM-Light System upgrades 288,985
CS Parks MM-Fencing, guardrails, bullrails, railings 10,000
CS Parks MM-Shoreline and bank stabilization 359,050
CS Parks MM-Structural reviews & repairs 35,333
CS Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan 150,170
CS Pathway, Sidewalk, Patio, and Boardwalk Repairs 130,212
CS Senior Center Fitness Room Attendant/Supplies 13,058
CS Springbrook Trail 81,687
CS Tree Maintenance 51,991
CS Regis Park Athletic Field Expansion 280,000
CS Irrigation System Renovation 424,727
CS Court Reports 40,000
CS Parking Lot and Drive Repairs 90,000
CS Ballfield Renovation Program 50,000
CS I-405/Talbot RD Streetscape Improvements 50,000
CS Renton Community Center 212,377
CS Senior Activity Center 105,786
CS Library - Main and Highlands 100,000
CS Benson Hill related remodel for City Hall 400,000
CS Fire Station 11 project close out 125,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 1,653,454 5,968,317 7,621,771
Ending Fund Balance 275,009 369,959 644,968
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 134 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 5/10
TRANSPORTATION CIP FUND (Fund 317)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 443,334 2,449,007 2,892,341
REVENUES 15,692,002
PW NE 31st ST Culvert - FEMA Grant 101,961
PW SW 27th St - Fed STP TIP No 4 2,300,000
PW SW 27th St - Fed Discretionary TIP No 4 848,000
PW Rainier Ave S - Fed STP TIP No 3 (635,040)
PW Lake WA Trail - Fed grant TIP No 15 493,000
PW Highlands to Landing - Fed STP TIP No 16 240,000
PW NE 31st ST Culvert - WA Military Dept Grant 16,993
PW Duvall Ave NE - TIB 215,000
PW SR 169 - WSDOT Agreement TIP No 7 50,000
PW SW 27th St - FMSIB TIP No 4 3,500,000
PW 3rd and Shattuck - WSDOT 150,000
PW Rainier Ave S - WSDOT TIP No 3 (50,197)
PW Rainier Ave S - WSDOT Agreement TIP No 3 1,000,000
PW Rainier Ave S - TIB TIP No 3 (181,362)
PW Rainier Ave S - Dept of Commerce TIP No 3 300,000
PW SW 27th St - Sound Transit TIP No 4 3,300,000
PW SW 27th St - Tukwila Reimbursement TIP No 4 (1,900,000)
PW Duval Ave - KC Reimbursement 250,000
PW Rainier Ave S - Sound Transit TIP No 3 1,624,529
PW Rainier Ave S - ARRA grant TIP No 3 1,647,156
PW Garden Ave - Transfer from Mitigation TIP No 8 500,000
PW 3rd and Shattuck - Transfer from Mitigation 150,000
PW Rainier Ave S - Transfer from Surface Water TIP No 3 650,000
PW Rainier Ave S - Transfer from Mitigation TIP No 3 379,000
PW Lake WA Trail - Transfer from Mitigation TIP No 15 81,000
PW Sidewalk Rehab - Transfer from CED TIP No 19 100,000
PW Highlands to Landing - Transfer in TIP No 16 (240,000)
Total Revenue Adjustment 15,692,002 14,890,040 30,582,042
EXPENDITURES 16,126,973
PW NE 31st ST Culvert - Construction 135,948
PW Arterial Circulation Program TIP No 32 80,000
PW Bridge Inspection & Repair TIP No 21 120,000
PW Transp Concurrency TIP No 33 40,000
PW Street Overlay Program TIP No 1 250,700
PW Traffic Safety Program TIP No 23 60,000
PW Duvall Av NE 215,000
PW WSDOT Coord. Program TIP No 35 20,000
PW Project Dev. & Predesign TIP No 31 50,000
PW Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) TIP No 25 45,000
PW SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR900 TIP No 7 50,000
PW Environmental Monitoring TIP No 34 40,000
PW SW 27th/Strander Design TIP No 4 2,214,900
PW SW 27th/Strander Design TIP No 4 5,833,100
PW Sunset Duvall Intersection 50,000
PW Duvall Av NE - King County 250,000
PW King County Mitigation Reserve 500,000
PW Intersection Safety & Mobility TIP No 22 50,000
PW Ripley Lane 29,000
PW Garden Av N Widening TIP No 8 605,000
PW S 3rd Street and Shattuck Ave 300,000
PW Rainier Av - Grady Way to S 2nd St TIP No 3 4,279,253
PW Barrier Free Trans. Plan TIP No 29 40,000
PW Lake WA Trail (Sam Chastain) TIP No 15 598,860
PW Sidewalk Rehabilitation and Replacement TIP No 19 330,000
PW Highlands to Landing Ped Connection TIP No 16 60,000
PW Preservation of Traffic Operation Dev TIP No 24 25,000
PW 1% for the Arts TIP No 37 15,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 16,126,973 16,286,761 32,413,734
Ending Fund Balance 8,363 1,052,286 1,060,649
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 135 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 6/10
SOUTH LAKE WASHINGTON CIP FUND (Fund 318)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 51,377 62,662 114,039
REVENUES -
Total Revenue Adjustment - - -
EXPENDITURES -
PW Complete South Lake Washington project close out, record drawings and punch list items 109,000
PW 318's portion of 1% for Arts Program 5,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment - 114,000 114,000
Ending Fund Balance 51,377 (51,338) 39
HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND (Fund 326)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 200,325 1,328 201,653
REVENUES -
Total Revenue Adjustment - - -
EXPENDITURES 100,000
CED Housing Opportunity Fund grants 100,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 100,000 100,000 200,000
Ending Fund Balance 100,325 (98,672) 1,653
AIRPORT FUND (Fund 402/422)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 345,663 703,420 1,049,083
REVENUES 3,495,163
Total Revenue Adjustment 3,495,163 - 3,495,163
EXPENDITURES 2,579,800
PW Mntc/Seaplane Dredging & Shoreline Mitigation 278,660
PW Major Facility Maintenance 10,000
PW Renton Gateway Utilities (35,175)
Total Expenditure Adjustment 2,579,800 253,485 2,833,284
Ending Fund Balance 1,261,026 449,935 1,710,962
SOLIDWASTE UTILITY FUND (Fund 403)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 882,793 (556,759) 326,034
REVENUES 15,000,000
PW Coordinated Prevention Grant 25,000
Total Revenue Adjustment 15,000,000 25,000 15,025,000
EXPENDITURES 15,000,000
PW Coordinated Prevention Grant 25,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 15,000,000 25,000 15,025,000
Ending Fund Balance 882,793 (556,759) 326,034
GOLF COURSE FUND (Fund 404/424)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 931,670 154,131 1,085,801
REVENUES 2,633,545
Total Revenue Adjustment 2,633,545 - 2,633,545
EXPENDITURES 2,716,837
CS Golf Course - Major Maintenance Driving Range Drainage Improvement Project 107,499
CS Golf Course-Irrigation Pumphouse Repair 45,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 2,716,837 152,499 2,869,336
Ending Fund Balance 848,378 1,632 850,010
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 136 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 7/10
WATER UTILITY FUND (Fund 405/425)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 2,751,814 4,405,294 7,157,108
REVENUES 14,276,610
PW Renton Hawk's Landing - Public Works Board Grant 500,000
Total Revenue Adjustment 14,276,610 500,000 14,776,610
EXPENDITURES 14,279,531
PW Intermt-Salaries & Wages 16,000
PW Water Maintenance Inventory was not included in 2010 original budget due to error 225,420
PW Telemetry Improvements Ph 4 40,000
PW Waterman Rehabilitation 500,000
PW Reservoir recoating 108,000
PW Water Quality Monitoring 50,000
PW Highlands 565 Zone Storage 10,000
PW 196 Zone Reservoir & P.S. 100,000
PW Renton Hawk's Landing - Water CIP portion 550,000
PW Duvall Ave NE Water Improv. 12,000
PW Emerg. Power to Pump Sta. 150,000
PW I-405 Utilities Redevelopment 15,000
PW Automatic Meter Reading Conv. 1,000,000
PW Well 9 Telemetry Improvements 5,000
PW Cascade Water Alliance Wholesale 10,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 14,279,531 2,791,420 17,070,951
Ending Fund Balance 2,748,893 2,113,874 4,862,767
WASTEWATER UTILITY FUND (Fund 406/416/426)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 1,141,392 1,634,146 2,775,538
REVENUES 20,057,672
PW CIP Transfer from Operating Fund 378,781
Total Revenue Adjustment 20,057,672 378,781 20,436,453
EXPENDITURES 20,376,804
PW Intermt-Salaries & Wages 12,000
PW Operating Transfer to CIP Fund 378,781
PW Sanitary Sewer Hyd Model 60,000
PW Earlington Sewer Replacement 675,000
PW 2008 Long-Range WW Man Plan 10,000
PW WSDOT I-405 Relocations 100,000
PW Stonegate II Lift Station 450,000
PW Westview LS Elim/Rehab 50,000
PW Dennys Lift Station Rehab 25,000
PW East Renton LS Elim (300,000)
PW 126th Ave SE Sewer Ext. 350,000
PW Lake Wa Beach LS Elim/Rehab (200,000)
Total Expenditure Adjustment 20,376,804 1,610,781 21,987,585
Ending Fund Balance 822,260 402,146 1,224,406
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 137 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 8/10
SURFACEWATER UTILITY FUND (Fund 407/427)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 1,011,382 2,971,460 3,982,842
REVENUES 8,018,148
PW WA Department Of Ecology Grant 15,000
PW Small Drainage - Fema Disaster Grants 20,783
PW Elliot Sp - FEMA Flood Disaster Repair G 215,148
PW Small Drainage - Ws Military Dept Grant 523
PW NPDES - WA Dept Of Ecology Grant 35,000
PW Elliot Sp - WA Military Dept Grnt 35,858
PW 205 Proj. Spawn - KC Flood Control Grnt 214,824
PW Green River - KC Conservation Grnt 204,906
PW CIP Transfer from Operating Fund 938,961
Total Revenue Adjustment 8,018,148 1,681,003 9,699,151
EXPENDITURES 7,897,923
PW Office/Operating Supplies - Npdes 15,000
PW Intermt-Salaries & Wages 15,000
PW Surface Water Maintenance Inventory was not included in 2010 original budget due to error 25,000
PW Operating Transfer to CIP Fund 938,961
PW Surface Water Utility System Plan 40,000
PW Small Drainage Projects Program 257,000
PW Madsen Creek Sedimentation Basin Cleaning 35,000
PW Maplewood Golf Course Sedimentation Basin Cleaning 10,000
PW USACE Spawning Channel Replacement Project 140,000
PW Renton Stormwater Manual 66,000
PW Green River Watershed Forum Ecosystem Restoration Project 443,000
PW Shattuck Ave S Storm System Improvement Project 113,000
PW Lake Ave S/Rainier Ave S Storm System Replacement Project\ 694,000
PW Dayton Ave NE & NE 22nd St Storm System Improvements 15,000
PW Storm System Field Mapping - NPDES Permit 410,000
PW Elliot Spawning Channel 2006 Flood FEMA Repair 327,000
PW Shattuck Ave S Storm System Improvement Project Transfer to 317 650,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 7,897,923 4,193,961 12,091,884
Ending Fund Balance 1,131,607 458,502 1,590,109
UTILITY BOND/RATE STABLIZATION FUND (Fund 461/471/481)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 15,501 104 15,605
REVENUES -
Total Revenue Adjustment - - -
EXPENDITURES -
Total Expenditure Adjustment - - -
Ending Fund Balance 15,501 104 15,605
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (Fund 501)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 3,956,502 636,897 4,593,399
REVENUES 3,631,241
Total Revenue Adjustment 3,631,241 - 3,631,241
EXPENDITURES 2,791,684
PW Fire dive boat replacement 40,000
PW Automated fueling system at Fire Station 13 160,000
PW Hybrid TV Truck - Wastewater 220,000
PW Hybrid Aid Unit in 2009 Carry forward never purchased 128,159
PW Trailer for Parks Dept 5,489
PW Police Vehicle 24,876
PW Sanders 8,719
PW Budget Adjustment, missed in 2010 Budget Process 35,000
Total Expenditure Adjustment 2,791,684 622,243 3,413,927
Ending Fund Balance 4,796,059 14,654 4,810,713
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 138 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 9/10
INSURANCE FUND (Fund 502)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 5,728,514 310,995 6,039,509
REVENUES 3,287,584
Total Revenue Adjustment 3,287,584 - 3,287,584
EXPENDITURES 4,170,106
Total Expenditure Adjustment 4,170,106 - 4,170,106
Ending Fund Balance 4,845,992 310,995 5,156,987
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND (Fund 503)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 579,805 1,068,126 1,647,931
REVENUES 4,105,387
FIT Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) 89,387
Total Revenue Adjustment 4,105,387 89,387 4,194,774
EXPENDITURES 3,715,819
FIT Maintenance Task Management 322,000
FIT Enterprise GIS 347,000
FIT Fire Asset Management 20,000
FIT New World Systems 87,500
FIT CJIS System Security 60,000
FIT Newcastle Fiber Conduit 50,000
FIT Phone System Replacement 150,000
FIT Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) 89,387
FIT Add Information Technology Director to index of positions (+1.0 FTE) -
Total Expenditure Adjustment 3,715,819 1,125,887 4,841,706
Ending Fund Balance 969,373 31,626 1,000,999
FACILITIES SERVICES FUND (Fund 504)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 35,166 56,009 91,175
REVENUES 4,555,485
CS Coulon Structure Maintenance 30,000
CS Fire Station 11 57,052
CS Transfer from 316 - City Hall 39,835
CS Transfer from 316 - Fire Station 12 23,103
Total Revenue Adjustment 4,555,485 149,990 4,705,475
EXPENDITURES 4,176,210
CS City Hall 39,835
CS Coulon Structure Maintenance 30,000
CS Fire Station 11 57,052
CS Fire Station 12 23,103
Total Expenditure Adjustment 4,176,210 149,990 4,326,200
Ending Fund Balance 414,441 56,009 470,450
COMMUNICATIONS FUND (Fund 505)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance - 111,818 111,818
REVENUES 1,049,671
Total Revenue Adjustment 1,049,671 - 1,049,671
EXPENDITURES 877,560
Total Expenditure Adjustment 877,560 - 877,560
Ending Fund Balance 172,111 111,818 283,929
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 139 of 184
2010 1st Quarter Budget Adjustment Detail 10/10
EMPLOYEE HEALTHCARE INSURANCE FUND (Fund 512)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 3,760,553 1,031,899 4,792,452
REVENUES 12,358,471
Total Revenue Adjustment 12,358,471 - 12,358,471
EXPENDITURES 12,462,810
Total Expenditure Adjustment 12,462,810 - 12,462,810
Ending Fund Balance 3,656,214 1,031,899 4,688,113
RETIREE HEALTHCARE INSURANCE FUND (Fund 522)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 1,935,616 884,857 2,820,473
REVENUES 2,235,684
Total Revenue Adjustment 2,235,684 - 2,235,684
EXPENDITURES 2,248,907
Total Expenditure Adjustment 2,248,907 - 2,248,907
Ending Fund Balance 1,922,393 884,857 2,807,250
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (Fund 611)
Adopted Adjustment Amended
Beginning Fund Balance 4,013,713 319,104 4,332,817
REVENUES 300,000
Total Revenue Adjustment 300,000 - 300,000
EXPENDITURES 550,475
Total Expenditure Adjustment 550,475 - 550,475
Ending Fund Balance 3,763,238 319,104 4,082,342
H:\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\1st Quarter Budget Adjustment - Carryforward\2010 1st Qtr Budget Adjustment.xlsx 04/07/2010
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 140 of 184
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 141 of 184
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 142 of 184
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of
the carry‐forward ordinance in the amount of $37,020,458, which Page 143 of 184
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Thunder Hills Creek Sanitary Sewer and Surface
Water Project Consultant Agreement with
Parametrix, Inc.
Meeting:
Regular Council - 12 Apr 2010
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Consultant Agreement
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
John Hobson, ext. 7279
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure
Required: $ $125,356 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $80,000 (2010 Wastewater
#426.465065)Revenue Generated: $
Total Project
Budget: $
$100,000 (426.465065) $60,000
(427.475015)City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Wastewater Utility and Surface Water Utility have identified the need to repair damage and
stabilize the drainage system in the Thunder Hills Creek.
The proposed contract, in the amount of $125,356, is within the established budget for the preliminary
design study for the project. The approved 2010 budget for this work comes from the Wastewater’s
Miscellaneous Projects (account #426.465065) and Surface Water’s Small Drainage Projects (account
#427.475015). Parametrix, Inc. was selected from the approved 2010 Utility Systems’ Annual Consultant
Roster.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the consultant agreement with Parametrix, Inc., in the
amount of $125,356, for services related to the Thunder Hills Creek Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water
Project.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 144 of 184
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 145 of 184
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 24, 2010
TO: Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: John Hobson, Wastewater Utility (ext. 7279)
SUBJECT: Thunder Hills Creek Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Project
Consultant Agreement with Parametrix, Inc.
ISSUE:
Should the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to approve and execute the
consultant agreement with Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356, for services
related to the Thunder Hills Creek Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Project?
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to approve and execute the consultant agreement
with Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356, for services related to the Thunder
Hills Creek Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Project.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
During a storm in November 2008, a 48-inch diameter drainage culvert in Thunder Hills
Creek experienced a failure which partially plugged the pipe thereby creating a sinkhole
above the pipe. The City obtained an emergency Department of Fisheries Hydraulic
Project Approval (HPA) Permit and had a contractor perform an emergency repair to the
culvert. However, due to the high flows at the time of the repair and the lack of the
appropriate sized replacement storm pipe in the region, a quick, temporary repair was
put in place.
During a storm in November 2009, the temporary culvert repair failed creating a backup
in the pipe which caused the stormwater to flow overland. This overland flow resulted
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 146 of 184
Mr. Persson, Council President
March 24, 2010
Page 2 of 2
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant
Correspondence\Issue Paper.doc\JDHtp
in significant erosion that threatened the nearby Thunder Hills Sanitary Sewer Main.
This sewer main is located in an access road that runs parallel to the Thunder Hills Creek
(see attached map).
The City of Renton obtained another emergency Department of Fisheries HPA Permit
and the City’s maintenance crews built a temporary overflow channel above the failed
culvert and used large rocks to armor the areas that were eroded due to the overland
stormwater flows. The HPA Permit was issued with the understanding that the project
was necessary to address emergency conditions resulting from the failure of the culvert.
However, the conditions of the permit required a subsequent project be constructed to
replace the failed culvert in order to prevent further impacts to fish habitat downstream
of the site.
The purpose of this contract is to identify a long-term solution to repair or replace the
existing culvert, stabilize the adjacent area to the culvert failure, and meet the HPA
Permit condition. In addition, the project will propose solutions to address the portion
of the downstream creek between the existing culvert and I-405 that are beginning to
show signs of erosion and slope failures.
The proposed contract, in the amount of $125,356, is within the established budget for
the preliminary design study for the project. The approved 2010 budget for this work
comes from the Wastewater’s Miscellaneous Projects (account #426.465065) and
Surface Water’s Small Drainage Projects (account #427.475015). Parametrix, Inc. was
selected from the approved 2010 Utility Systems’ Annual Consultant Roster.
CONCLUSION:
Thunder Hills Creek Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Project is in the Wastewater
Utility and Surface Water Utility’s 2010 Capital Improvement Program for design work.
This contract, in the amount of $125,356, is within the anticipated costs for this phase of
work. The funds needed to complete the construction of this proj ect will be determined
as part of this analysis and are anticipated to be budgeted as part of the 2011 budget
submittal.
Attachment
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
David Christensen, Wastewater Utility Engineering Supervisor
Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor
JoAnn Wykpisz, PW Principal Financial & Administrative Analyst
File
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 147 of 184
6
f
.
‐
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
a
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
w
i
t
h
P
a
r
a
m
e
t
r
i
x
,
I
n
c
.
,
i
n
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
$
1
2
5
,
3
5
6
f
o
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
P
a
g
e
1
4
8
o
f
1
8
4
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 1Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
ENGINEERING
ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this _______, day of __________, 2010, by and between the CITY
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "CITY," and
Parametrix, Inc. whose address is 1231 Fryar Avenue, Sumner, WA 98390-1516, at which work will be available
for inspection, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT."
PROJECT NAME: Thunder Hills Creek Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Project
WHEREAS, the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a
reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance
of a qualified professional consulting firm to do the necessary engineering wor k for the project, and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents, that it is in full
compliance with the statutes of the State of Washington for registration of professional engineers, has a current valid
corporate certificate from the State of Washington or has a valid assumed name filing with the Secretary of State and
that all personnel to be assigned to the work required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the work to
which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner, and that sufficient qualified personnel are on
staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Consultant has indicated that it desires to do the work set forth in the Agreement upon the terms
and conditions set forth below.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performances contained herein below,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
I
SCOPE OF WORK
The Consultant shall furnish, and hereby warrants that it has, the necessary equipment, materials, and professionally
trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work,
which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
The Consultant shall perform all work described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and
amendments to local and state regulations, guidelines and policies.
The Consultant shall prepare such information and studies as it may deem pertinent and necessary, in order to pass
judgment in a sound engineering manner on the features of the work. The Consultant shall make such minor
changes, amendments or revisions in the detail of the work as may be required by the City. This item does not
constitute an "Extra Work" item as related in Section VIII of the Agreement.
The work shall be verified for accuracy by a complete check by the Consultant. The Consultant will be held
responsible for the accuracy of the work, even though the work has been accepted by the City.
II
DESIGN CRITERIA
The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the work needed. Reports and plans, to the extent
feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of l ocal and State regulations,
guidelines, and specifications, including, but not limited to the following:
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 149 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 2Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
1. Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA),
"Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction," as amended by Renton
Standard Specification.
2. WSDOT/APWA, "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction."
3. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual."
4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for
Highway Bridges."
5. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Bridge Design Manual, Volumes 1 and 2."
6. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual of Highways Hydraulics," except hydrologic
analysis as described in item 14.
7. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline."
8. Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual."
9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices for Streets and Highways."
10. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual."
11. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines."
12. Standard drawings prepared by the City and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all
cases where they fit design conditions. Renton Design Standards, and Renton Specifications shall be
used as they pertain.
13. Metro Transit, design criteria.
14. King County Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, and Chapters 3, 4,
and 5.
15. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets."
III
ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT
BY THE CITY
The City will furnish the Consultant copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the
preparation of the plans, studies, specifications, and estimates within the limits of the assigned work.
All other records needed for the study must be obtained by the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with
other available sources to obtain data or records available to those agencies. The Consultant shall be responsible for
this and any other data collection to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. City will provide to Consultant
all data in City’s possession relating to Consultants services on the project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the
accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the City. Should field studies be needed, the
Consultant will perform such work to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. The City will not be obligated
to perform any such field studies.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 150 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 3Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
IV
OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND
DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT
Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the
Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material, including working
documents, notes, maps, drawings, photo, photographic negatives, etc. used in the project, shall become and remain
the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction. Any use of such documents by the City not
directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any
liability whatsoever to the Consultant.
All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing-arrow
symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be
printed on both sides of the recycled paper, as feasible.
V
TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION
The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed according to Exhibit B, Time Schedule of Completion,
attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services are to
be completed and all products shall be delivered by the Consultant unless there are delays du e to factors that are
beyond the control of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin work under the terms of this Agreement until
authorized in writing by the City. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed, the Consultant is delayed in the performance
of its services by factors that are beyond its control, the Consultant shall notify the City of the delay and shall
prepare a revised estimate of the time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to the City for
its approval. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as
otherwise herein.
Delays attributable to or caused by one of the parties hereto amounting to 30 days or more affecting the completion
of the work may be considered a cause for renegotiation or termination of this Agreement by the other party.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 151 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 4Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
VI
PAYMENT
The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided
hereinafter as specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed
or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the
work. All billings for compensation for work performed under this Agreement will list actual time (days and/or
hours) and dates during which the work was performed and the compensation shall be figured using the rates in
Exhibit C. Payment for this work shall not exceed $ _125,356.00_ without a written amendment to this contract,
agreed to and signed by both parties.
Cost Plus Net Fee
Payment for work accomplished shall be on the basis of the Consultant's actual cost plus a net fee. The actual cost
includes direct salary cost, overhead, and direct non-salary cost.
1. The direct salary cost is the salary expense for professional and technical personnel and principals for the
time they are productively engaged in the work necessary to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. The
direct salary costs are set forth in the attached Exhibit C and by this reference made a part of this
Agreement.
2. The overhead costs as identified on Exhibit C are determined as 189.11 percent of the direct salary cost
and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. The overhead cost rate is an estimate based on
currently available accounting information and shall be used for all progress payments over the period of
the contract.
3. The direct non-salary costs are those costs directly incurred in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement,
including, but not limited to travel, reproduction, telephone, supplies, and fees of outside consultants.
The direct non-salary costs are specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Billings for any direct non-salary
costs shall be supported by copies of original bills or invoices. Reimbursement for outside consultants
and services shall be on the basis of times the invoiced amount.
4. The net fee, which represents the Consultants profit shall be 10.685 percent of direct salary plus
overhead costs. This fee is based on the Scope of Work and the estimated labor hours therein. In the
event a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the Consultant, the supplemental
agreement will include provision for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The net fee will
be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of the project completed as estimated in the
Consultant's monthly progress reports and approved by the City. Any portion of the net fee not
previously paid in the monthly payments shall be included in the final payment, subject to the provisions
of Section XI entitled TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
5. Progress payments may be claimed monthly for direct costs actually incurred to date as supported by
detailed statements, for overhead costs and for a proportionate amount of the net fee payable to the
Consultant based on the estimated percentage of the completion of the services to date. Final payment of
any balance due the Consultant of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification
by the City after completion and acceptance by the City of the work under this Agreement. Acceptance,
by the Consultant of final payment shall constitute full and final satisfaction of all amounts due or
claimed to be due.
Payment for extra work performed under this Agreement shall be paid as agreed to by the parties hereto in writing at
the time extra work is authorized. (Section VIII "EXTRA WORK").
A short narrative progress report shall accompany each voucher for progress payment. The repor t shall include
discussion of any problems and potential causes for delay.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 152 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 5Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for consultant employees, the City may conduct employee
interviews.
Acceptance of such final payment by the Consultant shall constitute a release of all claims of any nature, related to
this Agreement, which the Consultant may have against the City unless such claims are specifically reserved in
writing and transmitted to the City by the Consultant prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however,
be a bar to any claims that the City may have against the Consultant or to any remedies the City may pursue with
respect to such claims.
The Consultant and its subconsultants shall keep available for inspection, by the City, for a period of three years
after final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement and all items related to, or bearing
upon, these records. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the three -year retention
period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been
resolved. The three-year retention period starts when the Consultant receives final payment.
VII
CHANGES IN WORK
The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the completed work of this Agreement as are necessary
to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the City, without additional compensation.
Should the City find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts
thereof revised, the Consultant shall make such revisions, if requested and as directed by the City in writing. This
work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as provided in Section VIII.
VIII
EXTRA WORK
The City may desire to have the Consultant perform work or render services in connection with the Project in
addition to or other than work provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Work. Such work will be
considered as Extra Work and will be specified in a written supplement which will set forth the nature and scope
thereof. Work under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to
whether work is Extra Work or work already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the work is
undertaken. Performance of the work by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any claim
by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Work.
IX
EMPLOYMENT
The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to
pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award
or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this
Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise
recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent f ee.
Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the
Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any
and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so
engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part
of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall
be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 153 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 6Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
The Consultant shall not engage, on a full or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any
professional or technical personnel who are, or have been at any time during the period of this contract, in the
employ of the City except regularly retired employees, without written consent of the City.
If during the time period of this Agreement, the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional, technical,
or clerical staff as a result of this work, the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement
and interview process.
X
NONDISCRIMINATION
The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for services
because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, sex, age or handicap except for a
bona fide occupational qualification with regard to, but not limited to the following: employment upgrading;
demotion or transfer; recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or termination’s; rates of pay or other forms
of compensation; selection for training; rendition of services. The Consultant under stands and agrees that if it
violates this Non-Discrimination provision, this Agreement may be terminated by the City and further that the
Consultant shall be barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future, unless a showing is made
satisfactory to the City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely.
XI
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10) days
written notice to the Consultant, subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with
subparagraphs C and D below.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory
personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the
work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar
to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the
City so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving
members of the Consultant, with the City's concurrence, desire to terminate this Agreement, payment
shall be made as set forth in Subsection C of this section.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 154 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 7Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City other than for fault on the part of the Consultant, a
final payment shall be made to the Consultant for actual cost for the work complete a t the time of
termination of the Agreement, plus the following described portion of the net fee. The portion of the net
fee for which the Consultant shall be paid shall be the same ratio to the total net fee as the work complete
is to the total work required by the Agreement. In addition, the Consultant shall be paid on the same
basis as above for any authorized extra work completed. No payment shall be made for any work
completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the Consultant of the Notice to Terminate. If the
accumulated payment made to the Consultant prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount
that would be due as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the Consultant shall
immediately reimburse the City for any excess paid.
D. In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the
Consultant, the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid
shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in
performing the work to the date of termination, the amount of work originally required which was
satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether that work is in a form o r of a type which is
usable to the City at the time of termination, the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete
the work required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value
to the City of the work performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment
made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set forth in
subsection C above had been applied.
E. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work, the original copies of all
Engineering plans, reports and documents prepared by the Consultant prior to termination shall become
the property of the City for its use without restriction. Such unrestricted use not occurrin g as a part of
this project, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant.
F. Payment for any part of the work by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies of
any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant, or for
failure of the Consultant to perform work required of it by the City. Forbearance of any rights under the
Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any fut ure act
or omission by the Consultant.
XII
DISPUTES
Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with work not disposed of by agreement between the
Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Director of Planning/ Building/Public Works or
his/her successors and delegees, whose decision in the matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties to this
Agreement.
In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this
Agreement, both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of
Washington, situated in King County.
XIII
LEGAL RELATIONS
The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and or dinances applicable to the
work to be done under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws
of Washington.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 155 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 8Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
The Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and
shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part
from the Consultant's errors, omissions, or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall
require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based
upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by
or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant's agents or employees and (b) the City, its agents,
officers and employees, this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be
valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or
employees except as limited below.
The Consultant shall secure general liability, property damage, auto liability, and professional liability coverage in
the amount of $1.0 million, with a General Aggregate in the amount of $2.0 million, unless waived or reduced by the
City. The Consultant shall submit a completed City of Renton Insurance Information Form, and the Standard Acord
Certification Form prior to the execution of the contract.
The City of Renton will be named as Additional Insured(s) on (CONTRACTOR’S) policy, with that coverage being
primary and non-contributory with any other policy(ies) available to the City. A copy of the endorsement shall be
provided to the City.
The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder.
All coverages provided by the Consultant shall be in a form, and underwritten by a company acceptable to the City.
The City will normally require carriers to have minimum A.M. Best rating of A XII. The Consultant shall keep all
required coverages in full force and effect during the life of this project, and a minimum of forty five days' written
notice shall be given to the City prior to the cancellation of any policy.
The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of relevant insurance policies to the City within 30
days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and Declaration page(s) shall be in a form as approved
by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration page(s) on file from a previous contract and no changes
in insurance coverage has occurred, only the Certification Form will be required.
The Consultant shall verify, when submitting first payment invoice and annually thereafter, possession of a current
City of Renton business license while conducting work for the City. The Consultant shall require, and provide
verification upon request, that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton
business license. The Consultant shall provide, and obtain City approval of, a traffic control plan prior to
conducting work in City right-of-way. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent
contractor.
It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitute the
Consultant’s waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this
indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall
survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.
XIV
SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS
The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement without the express consent of
the City.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 156 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 9Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
XV
ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS
The Consultant shall place their certification on all plans, specifications, estimates or any other engineering data
furnished by them in accordance with RCW 18.43.070.
XVI
COMPLETE AGREEMENT
This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the
parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement.
No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable
for, any statement, representation, promise, or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or
modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to wr iting and signed by the parties as an amendment
to this Agreement.
The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof,
and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted.
XVII
EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE
This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Request for Qualifications, and the supporting materials
submitted by the Consultant, and does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions
thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.
CONSULTANT CITY OF RENTON
Signature Date Mayor Date
type or print name ATTEST:
Title Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 157 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 10Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
EXHIBIT C
COST ESTIMATE
(To be filled in per tasks to be completed for Scope of Work)
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 158 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 11Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
COST PLUS NET FEE DETERMINATION
DIRECT SALARY COST: Hourly Rates of Pay
Personnel
Principal Engineer
Chief Engineer
Engineer
Surveyor
Surveyor
Planner
Bookkeeper
Executive Secretary
CADD Operator/Drafter
Clerical
Net Fee __________ % of direct salary cost plus overhead
DIRECT NON-SALARY COST:
Travel and Per Diem
Cars at $_________/mile
Per Diem ________________
Office and Equipment
Computer $__________/hour
Reproduction Expenses @ $ ______/copy ............................................................ $
Communications ...................................................................................................... $
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 159 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 12Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
EXHIBIT C (cont.)
SUMMARY OF FEE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
BREAKDOWN OF OVERHEAD COST
Profit Sharing ........................................................................................................... %
FICA ........................................................................................................................ %
Unemployment Compensation ................................................................................ %
Medical Aid and Industrial Insurance ..................................................................... %
Company Insurance and Medical ............................................................................ %
Vacation, Holiday and Sick Leave .......................................................................... %
State B & O Tax & Other Business Tax .................................................................. %
Insurance .................................................................................................................. %
Administration and Time Unassignable .................................................................. %
Printing, Stationery and Supplies ............................................................................ %
Travel Not Assignable ............................................................................................. %
Telephone and Telegraph Not Assignable .............................................................. %
Fees, Dues, Professional Meetings .......................................................................... %
Utilities and Maintenance ........................................................................................ %
Rent .......................................................................................................................... %
Rental Equipment .................................................................................................... %
Office Miscellaneous, Postage ................................................................................ %
Professional Services ............................................................................................... %
TOTAL %
SUMMARY OF COSTS
Project No. ___________________________
Name of Project _______________________
Direct Salary Cost ..................................................................................................................... $__________
Overhead Cost (including
payroll additives ......................................................................... _________ % $__________
Sub-Total $__________
Net Fee .............................................................................................................. % $__________
Direct Non-Salary Costs:
a. Travel and per diem ............................................... $ _________
b. Reproduction expenses .......................................... $ _________
c. Computer expense.................................................. $ _________
d. Outside consultants ................................................ $ _________
e. Other (specify) ....................................................... $ _________
Total $ _________
Sub Total $ _________
GRAND TOTAL $ _________
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 160 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 13Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
RESOLUTION NO. 3229
CITY OF RENTON
SUMMARY OF FAIR PRACTICES POLICY
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 3229
It is the policy of the City of Renton to promote and provide equal treatment and service to all citizens and to
ensure equal employment opportunity to all persons without regard to race, color, national origin, ethnic
background, gender, marital status, religion, age or disability, when the City of Renton can reasonably
accommodate the disability, of employees and applicants for employment and fair, non -discriminatory
treatment to all citizens. All departments of the City of Renton shall adhere to the following guidelines:
(1) EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - The City of Renton will ensure all employment related
activities included recruitment, selection, promotion, demotion, training, retention and
separation are conducted in a manner which is based on job-related criteria which does not
discriminate against women, minorities and other protected classes. Human resources
decisions will be in accordance with individual performance, staffing requirements, governing
civil service rules, and labor contract agreements.
(2) COOPERATION WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS - The City of Renton will
cooperate fully with all organizations and commissions organized to promote fair pract ices
and equal opportunity in employment.
(3) AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN - The City of Renton Affirmative Action Plan and Equal
Employment Program will be maintained and administered to facilitate equitable
representation with the City work force and to assure equal employment opportunity to all. It
shall be the responsibility of elected officials, the Mayor, the Affirmative Action Officer,
department administrators, managers, supervisors, Contract Compliance Officers and all
employees to carry out the policies, guidelines and corrective measures set forth in the
Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program.
(4) CONTRACTORS’ OBLIGATIONS - Contractors, sub-contractors, consultants and
suppliers conducting business with the City of Renton shall affirm and subscribe to the Fair
Practices and Non-discrimination policies set forth by the law and in the City’s Affirmative
Action Plan and Equal Employment Program.
Copies of this policy shall be distributed to all City employees, shall appear in all operatio nal documentation
of the City, including bid calls, and shall be prominently displayed in appropriate city facilities.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 161 of 184
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\Thunder Hills Creek\Consultant Correspondence\Parametrix Consultant
Contract.doc\ msoffice 14Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2009
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
________________________________________________________ hereby confirms and declares that
( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier)
I. It is _______________________________________________ policy to offer equal
( Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier)
opportunity to all qualified employees and applicants for employment without regard to
the race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, disability or veteran status.
II. ________________________________________________ complies with all applicable
(Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant)
federal, state and local laws governing non-discrimination in employment.
III. When applicable, ________________________________________________ will seek out and
(Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant)
negotiate with minority and women contractors for the award of subcontracts.
Print Agent/Representative’s Name
Print Agent/Representative’s Title
Agent/Representative’s Signature
Date Signed
Instructions: This document MUST be completed by each contractor, subcontractor, consultant and/or supplier.
Include or attach this document(s) with the contract.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 162 of 184
City of Renton 558-1779-853 (01/03)
Thunder Hill Creek 1 February 2010
Scope of Work
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Renton
Thunder Hill Creek Project
INTRODUCTION
Thunder Hill Creek is located in a steep confined ravine. An access road and sanitary sewer line are
located in the vicinity of Thunder Hill Creek. The access road is located to the west of the creek. The
sanitary sewer line is likely located under the access road. In November 2008, a culvert conveying the
upper portion of Thunder Hill Creek failed creating erosion in the vicinity of the culvert and along the
sanitary sewer access road. In response to the failure, a section of the culvert was replaced and fill
material was added. In November 2009 this temporary repair failed, and the culvert plugged. Overland
flow of the creek and extensive erosion occurred. Emergency channel repairs were constructed in
November/December of 2009 using large rock and quarry spalls that were placed in the eroded areas to
minimize the potential of further erosion, protect the access road, protect the existing sanitary sewer line
and protect the repaired culvert. The stream continues to be subject to erosion, and the sanitary sewer
line, culvert and access road are at risk of being damaged. This portion of the project area is referred to as
the Upper Failure Site in this scope of work.
In addition, portions of the stream bank downstream of the failure site are eroding and several wire
gabions located along the west bank of the stream have failed. The existing access road has eroded in
several locations, and portions of the lower sewer line are also at risk. The ravine also has several
drainages along the northeast slope that are eroding the ravine walls and undermining bank protection
measures along the northeastern stream bank (Figure 1). This portion of the project area together with the
Upper Failure Site is referred to as the Overall System in this scope of work.
This scope of work is to assist the City in developing a long-term solution for the Upper Failure Site and
the Overall System. The purposes of the long-term solution are to:
Stabilize the project area to reduce future maintenance needs at the Upper Failure Site and along
the access road;
Protect the existing access road;
Protect the existing sanitary sewer line;
Provide and protect a surface water conveyance system at the Upper Failure Site;
Use the emergency repairs performed at the Upper Failure Site to the extent practicable;
Provide a consistent approach, if practicable, between the Upper Failure Site and the downstream
reach; and,
Meet the requirements of Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for the
options developed for the Upper Failure Site and the Overall System.
Based on early coordination between WDFW and the City it is likely that some enhancement of stream
habitat will be required but it is unlikely that fish passage will be required. WDFW expectations for the
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 163 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 2 February 2010
Scope of Work
site will be clarified as part of the development and evaluation of the options through coordination with
WDFW.
This scope of work also includes geotechnical engineering services as a sub-consultant to Parametrix.
Soil and Environmental Engineers, Inc. (SEE) will be providing geotechnical engineering services under
Task 3.
This scope of work also includes utility locating and television inspection services as a sub-consultant to
Parametrix. Applied Professional Services (APS) will be providing utility locating and television
inspection services under Task 2.
To successfully complete this project, the City will provide the following:
Staff to unlock the gates for access to the project area for field services. Gates are located along
the access road near the Upper Failure Site and at the BPA right-of-way;
Record drawings of the existing sanitary sewer system and any other City utilities in the vicinity
of the project.
Existing hydrologic and hydraulic studies and reports.
Existing approved Hydraulic Project Approvals (HPAs) for the 2008 and 2009 repairs.
Copies of WSDOT planned improvements to I-405 and the culvert replacement.
Title reports for parcels 2023059005, 2023059070, 2023059113 and 2023059112.
The project schedule includes the following milestones. Dates are subject to change based on timely
receipt of requested information from the City:
City issues Notice to Proceed: April 12, 2010
Completion of utility locating, geotechnical borings, field survey and base map: April 27, 2010
Site visit with WDFW and City: April 22, 2010
Team meeting to identify concepts to carry forward: April 30, 2010
Meeting with City to determine Preferred Option for Upper Failure Site: May 21, 2010
Submit Upper Failure Site Options and Geotechnical Draft Technical Memoranda: June 4, 2010
Receive City review comments: June 11, 2010
Submit Upper Failure Site Options and Geotechnical Final Technical Memoranda: June 25, 2010
Meeting with City to determine Preferred Option for Overall System Solution: July 9, 2010
Submit Overall System Solution Draft Technical Memorandum: July 23, 2010
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 164 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 3 February 2010
Scope of Work
Receive City review comments: July 30, 2010
Submit Overall System Solution Final Technical Memorandum: August 13, 2010
Submit Permits Draft Technical Memorandum: July 9, 2010
Receive City review comments: July 16, 2010
Submit Permits Final Technical Memorandum: August 13, 2010
PHASE 1 – OVERALL SYSTEM OPTIONS EVALUATION
Measurable Phase Objectives
The objective of Phase 1 is to develop and evaluate up to three options for a permanent solution for the
Upper Failure Site and the Overall System. A Preferred Option will be selected based on coordination
with the City. Final design and associated field services for the Preferred Option will be performed in a
separate, future phase.
Task 1 – Site Survey
Measurable Task Objective
Parametrix survey will perform a topographic survey and prepare a base map of the project area to form a
basis for option analysis and design.
Approach
Parametrix will develop a 2-ft to 5-ft contour topographic map showing significant ground features,
existing utilities, limits of the existing access road, and trees with a diameter of 8-inch and larger. The
contour interval may vary depending on ground slopes in the area. Steeper slopes may be represented
with a larger contour interval. The existing utilities will be identified by above ground features and
locations provided by APS. The survey and topographic mapping will begin at the inlet of the WSDOT
pipe that flows beneath Interstate 405 and end 50-ft upstream of the inlet of the failed culvert. The width
of the field topography will cover the bottom of the ravine and 15 feet of the side slope. The topography
will be relative to NAD 83 and NAVD 88 horizontal and vertical datums, respectively, and will be tied to
at least two City of Renton control monuments. The overall limits of field survey are approximately
1,360-ft in length and 50-ft in width.
The extent of rock placement for the 2009 emergency repairs will be surveyed. The invert along the
overflow route along the top of the rock placement will also be surveyed. The existing culvert system at
the 2009 emergency repairs will also be surveyed.
Parametrix will tie relative boundary monumentation to delineate adjacent property boundaries and
easements and will identify these boundaries and easements on the topographic map.
Parametrix will survey the geotechnical boring locations that are performed under Task 3.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 165 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 4 February 2010
Scope of Work
Assumptions
The Interstate 405 right-of-way or features will not need to be delineated or surveyed as part of this task.
Adequate boundary monumentation is available to resolve the subject property boundaries.
APS will provide field locating of existing utilities in Task 2.
Parametrix will mobilize up to two times. The second mobilization is to survey the utility potholing
performed under Task 2 and the geotechnical boring and hand auger locations performed under Task 3.
City will coordinate right-of-access as required to perform the survey.
There may be other existing utilities within the limits of survey. The focus on the project is protection of
the City’s existing sanitary sewer line. If other utilities exist within the limits of the survey, they will be
considered only as they relate to developing options for protecting the City’s sanitary sewer. Additional
survey, through a scope amendment, will be required for any solution outside the limits of survey.
Survey support for any right-of-way or easements to be acquired as part of a Preferred Option will be
provided in future design phases.
Property corners will not be set in the field as part of this phase. Property corners can be set in future
project phases.
There are no known utilities, other than the existing sanitary sewer, that will impact option development.
Deliverables
Project base map in an AutoCAD format in accordance with City standards.
Task 2 – Utility Locating and Television Inspection
Measurable Task Objective
Most of the services under Task 2 are to be provided by APS. The budget includes up to two hours for
Parametrix staff to coordinate with APS.
Identify existing utilities in the field for topographical survey by Parametrix.
Television inspection of existing culvert at Upper Failure site.
Television inspection of the existing sanitary sewer.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 166 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 5 February 2010
Scope of Work
Approach
Mark on the ground surface, using APWA color designations, both conductible and non-conductible
utilities within the project boundaries identified by Parametrix. Utilities to be marked included but are
not necessarily limited to sanitary sewer, storm drains, natural gas mains and services, primary and
secondary electric cables, cable TV, and telecommunications systems. Water systems will also be field
located except for PVC, AC, or wood pipe materials.
A three-man field crew, using non-conductible locating devices such as crawler tractors, push rods,
sondes, and locatable cameras, will video record and will mark on the surface sanitary sewers and storm
drains through access at cleanouts, manholes and other available access points throughout the site.
APS air / vacuum crews will provide utility test holes on the existing sanitary sewer main to obtain depth
and location after the locating phase has been completed. The time and costs for this task will be
dependant on several factors such as actual depth of the sewer main, its location in the field and access to
the test hole locations.
Conduct an electronic sweep to identify any unknown and / or abandoned conductible utilities that might
be within the project area.
After utility locations, video taping and potholing have been performed, participate in site review with
Parametrix survey staff to review pick-up of utility markings and to answer any questions.
Assumptions
The budget estimate assumes that a 3 man crew will be required for field locating services and utility
potholing.
Vehicle access to the existing sanitary sewer will be from the BPA right-of-way access gate and that the
City of Renton will open the above-ground cleanout at the sound end of the project on the east side of the
creek. If the City does not have a key to the BPA gate, the City will coordinate with BPA for a BPA
representative to open the gate.
The condition of the pipe is sufficient to allow the equipment to navigate through the utility. If debris or
pipe conditions appear as if they will prevent successful completion of the scope of work or jeopardizes
equipment retrieval, the APS site manager will stop work and notify Parametrix.
Additional time, if required due to unforeseen field conditions encountered at the time this scope of work
is performed, will be invoiced on a time and materials basis.
Deliverables
Two copies on DVD of television inspection and paper copies of field notes.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 167 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 6 February 2010
Scope of Work
Task 3 – Geotechnical Support
Measurable Task Objective
Services under Task 3 are to be provided by SEE. The budget under Task 3 includes up to 3 hours for
Parametrix staff to coordinate with SEE.
Perform geotechnical site exploration to determine:
Approximate depth of unconsolidated soils above sandstone along the access road;
If there is a boundary layer for groundwater movement; and,
Options for type and depth of walls along the access road; and,
Conceptual risk characterization of failure of ravine walls.
Prepare a Draft and Final Geotechnical Memorandum.
Approach
Perform up to two drill mounted soil borings in the vicinity of the Upper Failure Site. Borings will
extend approximately 50-feet.
Perform up to four soil borings using portable equipment in the lower reaches of the project area. Borings
will extend approximately 10-feet.Standard penetration samples will be taken at intervals of 2.5-feet in
the upper 15-feet and intervals of 5-feet at depths greater than 15-feet. Larger samplers up to 2.5-inch
diameter will also be used to obtain gravelly soil samples.
Perform up to six hand augers along the ravine walls in the lower stream reach to assess potential depth to
underlying sandstone and sloughing potential for upper soil layers.
Perform literature review of available soil and geologic information for project area to determine ravine
failure characterization and risk.
Prepare a geotechnical memorandum that includes the following:
A brief summary of the project area geologic information;
A description of the on-site geologic investigation, equipment, methods, and testing performed;
Site specific geologic information such as a site map, boring locations, boring logs, soil profile,
water elevations, soil samples, and soil analysis results;
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 168 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 7 February 2010
Scope of Work
Analysis of the geologic information and recommendations for wall types, wall backfill, and
dewatering; and,
Conceptual risk characterization of failure along ravine walls and identifying the next steps
necessary to develop long-term ravine stability solutions.
Assumptions
The existing sanitary sewer is below the access road. Geotechnical services will be performed to address
the stability of the access road along the stream.
There will be up to two types of walls identified in the geotechnical memorandum. A modular wall, such
as a gabion wall, may be appropriate in the lower reaches of the stream. A mechanical wall, such as
soldier piles with timber lagging, may be appropriate in the Upper Failure Site.
The stability of the ravine walls adjacent to the stream and the access road is outside the scope of this
project. Geotechnical services related to the stability of the ravine wall, if requested by the City, would
be performed through a modification to this scope of work.
The budget estimate includes up to two days of field time for hand augers along the ravine walls. The
actual number of augers will be contingent upon field conditions encountered.
Lab analyses for soil properties or contamination are not included.
Walls with tie-backs may be considered if they are a potential solution, even if tie-back easements are
required. Walls with tie-backs will not be considered as a potential solution if tie-backs extend under
existing structures..
Deliverables
Preliminary Technical Memorandum, as a pdf, submitted to Parametrix for review for consistency with
this scope of work.
Draft Technical Memorandum submitted to Parametrix as a pdf. Text will be submitted in Microsoft
Word format. Parametrix will submit to City for review.
Final Technical Memorandum submitted as five (5) hard copies and a pdf. Parametrix will retain one
copy and submit the remaining copies to the City.
Task 4 – Evaluate Upper Failure Site Options
Measurable Task Objectives
Parametrix will identify and evaluate up to three options for the Upper Failure Site. Selection of the
Preferred Option will be contingent upon the television inspection of the existing culvert and location of
the existing sanitary sewer. The options will likely include:
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 169 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 8 February 2010
Scope of Work
Option A: leaving the existing rock in place to the extent of the 2009 emergency repairs; leaving
the existing culvert in place; adding an overflow riser at the upstream end of the culvert;
removing the high point in the flow line of the overflow along the top of the rock; restoring the
access road; and, providing offsite stream mitigation.
Option B: Replacing damaged sections of the existing culvert; removing most of the rock placed
during the 2009 emergency repairs; allowing a berm to remain to control flow rates to the
downstream reach; adding an overflow riser; restoring the access road; and, providing offsite
stream mitigation.
Option C: Removing all rock placed during the 2009 emergency repairs; constructing an open
low flow channel for in-stream habitat with a high-flow by-pass pipe; restoring the access road;
and, constructing a cutoff wall to limit channel migration toward the access road.
Approach
After the initial field data is obtained and a base map prepared, Parametrix will review the information
and then meet with the City to identify the options to be carried forward for evaluation. Option
identification is contingent upon the horizontal and vertical location of the existing sanitary sewer relative
to the stream, and geotechnical factors.
Meet with the geotechnical engineer up to two times.
Conceptual hydraulic calculations will be performed for each option using Manning's equation and flow
rates provided by the City for the I-405 culvert. A detailed hydraulic model, such as HEC-RAS or XP-
SWMM, will be performed as needed for final design and construction documents in future phases. The
following flow rates will be used to support options evaluation. Flow rates will be obtained from the
November 5, 2009 memorandum I-405 Renton Stage 2 Project Improvements Downstream Analysis,
prepared by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. for future land use conditions.
One percent chance exceedance (100-year event) flow rate for the overflow structure for Options
A and B;
One percent chance exceedance (100-year event) flow rate for an overflow weir in the berm
formed for Options A and B;
50 percent chance exceedance (2-year event) flow rate for conceptual low flow channel design
and conceptual scour calculations for Option C;
One percent chance exceedance (100-year event) minus the 50 percent chance exceedance (2-year
event) flow rate for conceptual high flow bypass design for Option C; and,
Flow rates for the existing culvert diameter based on a headwater-to-depth ratio of 1.5:1 and
concrete culvert nomographs.
Parametrix will participate in up to one field visit with WDFW and the City. Parametrix will review
information, if any, provided to the City by WDFW for developing options. Parametrix will research and
document historic fish use, upstream habitat, and downstream fish barriers including the pipe under I-405.
Parametrix will evaluate the feasible stream gradient as compared to WDFW standards for roughened
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 170 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 9 February 2010
Scope of Work
channel design, pool and weir spacing, and determine the feasibility of providing fish passage at the site
with an open channel.
Each option will be developed and evaluated for compatibility with the long-term system solutions for the
Overall System. Overall long-term system solutions will be developed in Phase 1 Task 5. Each of the
three options will be evaluated for constructibility, cost, long-term channel stability, maintenance
concerns, instream habitat, and fish passage based on WDFW requirements. Hand sketches that illustrate
the options will be prepared on the AutoCAD base map. The options will be shown on separate sketches.
After the evaluation has been performed and the sketches prepared, Parametrix will meet with the City to
present the results of the option development and evaluation and to select a preferred alternative.
After meeting with the City, a technical memorandum will be prepared that includes a description of each
option, the results of the evaluation, the sketches, and appendices with technical support information. The
technical memorandum will discuss the benefits and risks and potential impacts to instream habitat
associated with each option. The technical memorandum will be prepared to support coordination efforts
with WDFW and will include a discussion of opportunities and limitations for habitat and fish passage
improvements at the site.
Assumptions
Older portions of the existing culvert not replaced in 2008 or 2009 will not likely remain in service. Any
option that includes a culvert at the Upper Failure Site will include replacement of the older portions of
the culvert. Replacement may be in a separate horizontal and / or vertical alignment and include plugging
the older portions of the existing culvert.
Detailed Hydraulic Analysis will be performed for the Preferred Option during the future design phase of
the project
The City will coordinate with WDFW regarding expectations and permit requirements for the site.
The Preferred Option will be identified during coordination meetings with the City and will be reflected
in the Draft and Final Technical Memorandum. The decision regarding the Preferred Option will be final
and will not change from the Draft to the Final Technical Memorandum.
The City will review the Draft Technical Memorandum and provide comments within five working days
after submittal.
The Technical Memorandum will be less than 20 pages total and will include a summary of field
observations, describe each option, sketches of the options, a cost opinion for each option, and an
appendix to document technical calculations and assumptions. There will be up to two sketches on 11x17
size paper for each option, up to a total of six sheets. Sketches will illustrate overall plan concepts and
associated sections and profiles. The results of the evaluation criteria will be summarized in a table in the
main body of the Technical Memorandum.
Parametrix will provide site photos on a CD.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 171 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 10 February 2010
Scope of Work
Deliverables
Meeting notes, up to two pages, for meeting with WDFW and City, prepared in Word format.
Meeting notes, up to two pages each, for two meetings with City, prepared in Word format.
Draft Technical Memorandum submitted as a pdf. Text will be submitted in Microsoft Word format to
assist with City review.
Final Technical Memorandum submitted as four (4) hard copies and a pdf.
Task 5 – Overall System Solutions
Measurable Task Objective
Parametrix will develop and evaluate up to three overall system solutions for the existing sewer line
within the Thunder Hills Creek ravine. Selection of the Preferred Option will be contingent upon the
location and results of the television inspection of the existing sanitary sewer, and geotechnical
information. The options will likely include:
Option A: constructing a cutoff wall along the access road to limit channel migration into the
access road; restoring the access road; and, providing off-site stream mitigation.
Option B: similar to Option A except stream restoration will be on-site.
Option C: relocating the sanitary sewer out of the ravine with a new pump station and force main
system; abandoning the existing sanitary sewer; leaving the downstream reach as-is; and,
providing offsite stream mitigation.
Based on the results of the evaluation, Parametrix will coordinate with City staff to identify a Preferred
Option. The overall system solution will be developed in conjunction with the Preferred Option for the
Upper Failure Site so that the final design, construction sequencing and implementation are integrated.
Approach
The overall system solution for this site will be developed based on an analysis of the benefits and
existing risks to the system. Risks include (1) continued problems at the Upper Failure Site, (2) long-term
stability of the gabion banks, and (3) risks associated with debris flows (sediment) blocking the inlet to
the I-405 culvert. The risk evaluation will include coordination with the City of Renton, review of
planned WSDOT improvements to I-405 and the planned replacement of the existing Thunder Hill Creek
culvert under I-405, and options developed for the Upper Failure Site.
The options developed for the overall system will then be evaluated to determine the Preferred Option to
protect the existing sanitary sewer line. Options will be compared to one another by the following
criteria: (1) constructibility, (2) cost, including costs associated with a pump station, (3) long-term stream
channel stability, (4) maintenance concerns, (5) instream habitat, and (6) fish passage. The solutions that
maintain the sewer line in its existing location will also evaluate the feasibility of re-establishing access to
the sewer line by re-opening the existing road. Any option that relocates the sewer line out of the ravine
will identify access to the sewer line, pump station, and manholes for maintenance. The options will be
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 172 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 11 February 2010
Scope of Work
described in a technical memorandum which also documents the evaluation process, analysis and
recommendations and includes sketches of the different options evaluated.
The technical memorandum will include hand-sketches on the AutoCAD base map illustrating the option
concepts.
A conceptual scour analysis will be performed to assist in the conceptual cutoff wall design. A detailed
scour analysis will be needed in future design phases for final design. The following flow rates, identified
in Task 2, will be used for the conceptual scour analysis and for on-site stream mitigation concepts; there
are no flow rate calculations included in Task 3.
Culvert flow rate from the Upper Site identified in Task 2; and,
Flow rates for conceptual high flow bypass design identified in Task 2.
Assumptions
Geotechnical services will be provided by a sub-consultant to Parametrix.
Horizontal alignment for a relocated sanitary sewer will be conceptually shown on City utility mapping.
Vertical alignment and survey would be developed in future design phases if a new sewer alignment is
selected as the Preferred Option.
Detailed Hydraulic Analysis will be performed for the Preferred Option during the future design phase of
the project
The Preferred Option will be identified during coordination meetings with the City and will be reflected
in the Draft and Final Technical Memorandum. The decision regarding the Preferred Option will be final
and will not change from the Draft to the Final Technical Memorandum.
The City will review the Draft Technical Memorandum and provide comments within five working days
after submittal.
The Technical Memorandum will be less than 20 pages total and will include a summary of field
observations, describe each option, include a summary table that lists the evaluation criteria and
evaluation results for each option, sketches of the options, a cost opinion for each option, and an
appendix to document technical calculations and assumptions. There will be up to two sketches on 11x17
size paper for each option, up to a total of six sheets. Sketches will illustrate overall plan concepts and
associated sections and profiles. The results of the evaluation criteria will be summarized in a table in the
main body of the Technical Memorandum.
Deliverables
Meeting notes, up to two pages, for meeting with City, prepared in Word format.
Draft Technical Memorandum submitted as a pdf. Text will be submitted in Microsoft Word format to
assist with City review.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 173 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 12 February 2010
Scope of Work
Final Technical Memorandum submitted as four (4) hard copies and a pdf.
Task 6 – Permit Identification
Measurable Task Objective
Parametrix staff will review the Preferred Options for the upper failure site and the overall long term
solution and identify permitting needs.
Approach
Parametrix will prepare a technical memorandum up to five pages identifying the anticipated permits
needed for the Preferred Option for the upper failure site and the overall system solution, identifying the
technical analysis needed to support the permit applications, and a timeline for review and approval of
each permit. Parametrix will note any differences in permitting needs between the option for the upper
failure site and the overall long-term solution for the entire site if applicable.
Assumptions
The project will likely need a BA, an HPA, SEPA checklist, JARPA, construction NPDES permit, and
local critical areas and clearing and grading permits. Permits will be obtained in future phases.
Parametrix will coordinate with City staff to identify local permit requirements and potential utility
exemptions.
Archaeological review will be performed in future design phases for the Preferred Option.
Hazardous site review will be performed in future design phases for the Preferred Option.
The City will review the Draft Technical Memorandum and provide comments within five working days
after each submittal.
The Draft and Final Technical Memorandum will be up to five pages.
Deliverables
Draft Technical Memorandum submitted as a pdf. Text will be submitted in Microsoft Word format to
assist with City review.
Final Technical Memorandum submitted as four (4) hard copies and a pdf.
Task 7 – Project Management and Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Measurable Task Objective
The Parametrix project manager will provide oversight of the Thunder Hills Creek Project.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 174 of 184
SCOPE OF WORK (CONTINUED)
City of Renton 558-1779-853 01/02
Thunder Hill Creek 13 February 2010
Scope of Work
Approach
Parametrix’s project manager will oversee the work of Parametrix staff, review budgets, and track
utilization of staff and coordinate with the City’s project manager. The project manager will schedule
quality control reviews and maintain the quality control review log.
Perform quality control reviews of the draft and final technical memorandums prior to submittal to City.
Monthly invoices will reflect project costs at the phase level. The invoice will identify the project costs
as 60-percent to the Wastewater Utility Engineering group and 40-percent to the Surface Water Utility
Engineering group.
Assumptions
Up to three Parametrix staff will attend a Project kick-off meeting at the City of Renton
Up to two Parametrix staff will attend up to four (4) additional meetings with City of Renton staff to
discuss the options and evaluation criteria. These meetings are in addition to meetings identified in other
tasks. These meetings will be held based upon request by the City or Parametrix.
Parametrix will prepare a project management plan for internal distribution outlining the scope, schedule,
budget and milestones for the project
Phase 1 of the project is anticipated to last up to four (4) months. Permitting and construction plans and
specifications will be prepared during the future Phase 2. The scope, schedule and budget for Phase 2
will be determined after Phase 1 is completed.
Deliverables
Meeting notes, up to two pages, for up to four meetings with City, prepared in Word format.
Monthly project status updates and invoices.
QA/QC documentation for project deliverables.
6f. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with
Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $125,356 for designs services related Page 175 of 184
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ENDORSING THE
CASCADE AGENDA, AND PURSUING A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CASCADE LAND
CONSERVANCY AS A MEMBER OF THE CASCADE AGENDA CITIES PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the population in the Puget Sound region is expected to double in the next
one hundred (100) years on top of the already dramatic growth recently experienced, thereby
significantly impacting the growth of cities and towns; and
WHEREAS, long-term ecosystem health, economic vitality and quality of life are of
critical importance to citizens of the City; and
WHEREAS, in the face of such growth, the City can maintain and enhance the quality of
life by guiding how and where this growth will occur; and
WHEREAS, The Cascade Agenda is a one hundred (100) year collective vision for the
central Puget Sound region with the goals of conserving 1.3 million acres of working farms,
forests, and natural areas and creating vibrant and livable communities, while sustaining a
strong regional economy; and
WHEREAS, the Cascade Land Conservancy, recognizing the relationship between making
our communities spectacular enough to attract growth and the conservation of this region's
ecosystems and working lands, has launched the "Cascade Agenda Cities Program" to help local
jurisdictions create complete, compact and connected communities;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects.
8a. ‐ Cascade Agenda Cities Program Membership (See 7.b.)
Page 176 of 184
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION II. The City endorses the vision articulated in The Cascade Agenda as
beneficial to the City and the region as a whole.
SECTION III. The City shall pursue a partnership with the Cascade Land Conservancy as
a member of the Cascade Agenda Cities Program to advance this vision within the community.
SECTION IV. The City will seek to align policies and programs on community
development, housing, transportation, parks, open space, and sustainability with the objectives
of the Cascade Agenda Cities Program, striving to make the City more complete, compact and
connected.
SECTION V. The City shall appoint a staff person to act as the City's primary link to
Cascade Agenda Cities related activities.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of. _, 2010.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of. ., 2010.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Denis Law, Mayor
RES:1443:2/26/10:scr
8a. ‐ Cascade Agenda Cities Program Membership (See 7.b.)
Page 177 of 184
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER
13, LIBRARY BOARD, OF TITLE II, (COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS), OF
ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO CREATE A LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD FOR
ISSUES RELATED TO SERVICES PROVIDED TO RENTON RESIDENTS BY THE KING
COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Chapter 13, Library Board, of Title II (Commissions and Boards) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington",
is hereby amended as follows:
CHAPTER 13
LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD
2-13-1: Creation Of Library Advisory Board
2 13 2: Authority
2-13-32
2-13-43
2-13-54
Function Purpose
Appointment
Terms; Vacancies
2-13-65: Meetings And Quorum
2 13 7
2 13 8
2 13 9
Appointment, Qualifications, And Duties Of Library Director
Budget And Finances
Labor Agreements And Personnel Policy
2-13-1 CREATION OF LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD:
Pursuant to RCW 27.12.190, T-there is hereby created a Library Advisory Board
in the City of Renton. Support for the board is to be provided by the King County
Library System.
8a. ‐ Creating a Library Advisory Board (See 7.a.)
Page 178 of 184
ORDINANCE NO.
2 13 2 AUTHORITY:
Tho Library Advisory Board is established pursuant to RCW 35A.27.010.
2-13-32 FUNCTION: PURPOSE:
A^—The Library Advisory_Board shall have tho power to establish policy for
library activity, including policy for the control and supervision of all libraries
belonging to the City.
&—In conjunction with tho Mayor and City Council, the Library Board may
further establish policy to plan, promote, manage, construct, develop, maintain
and operate, within the City limits, libraries and improve and ornament the
same.
G-.—The Board shall further receive, in the name of the City, all monies or
other property donated by individuals or groups for the improvomont of
libraries; the Board reserves the right to reject any such donations in the event
that any such donations bo considered improper, unlawful or contrary to the
purposes sot forth. Any cash received by the Board on bohalf of the City shall bo
paid to the Director of Finance and same shall be placed in tho Library Fund.
The Library Advisory Board shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Mayor
and City Council and shall also coordinate with, and provide input to, the King
County Library Board and local library officials regarding the scope and quality of
library services provided by the King County Library System to the residents of
Renton, and to the extent it is requested to do so, to represent the City's
interests before the King County Library Board with respect to such services.
8a. ‐ Creating a Library Advisory Board (See 7.a.)
Page 179 of 184
ORDINANCE NO.
At the request of the King County Library System, the board will participate in
studies concerning the need for, acquisition, use, care, maintenance and
disposition of library buildings and all property or equipment pertaining to or
associated with library purposes. It will review, advise, and make
recommendations to the King County Library Board relative to the need for
programs that address the needs of Renton residents, and the promulgation and
enforcement of rules and regulations regarding the use of the library, its
buildings and equipment, and rules of conduct and behavior of those using the
buildings.
2-13--43 APPOINTMENT:
The Library Advisory Board shall consist of seven (7) five (5) members, who
shall be citizonsresidents of the City of Renton, and who shall be appointed by
the Mayor, subject to the confirmation by a majority of the members of the City
Council, one of which shall bo a youth representative under 21 years of ago at
the timo of appointment. No Library Advisory Board member shall receive any
compensation for his or her service whatsoever except for reimbursement of
actual expenditures duly authorized by the City Council.
2-13-54 TERMS; VACANCIES:
A. The term of each Library Advisory Board member so appointed shall be
for a period of five (5) years from the date of such appointment, unless the
appointment is to fill an unexpired term, except for the youth member, who
shall sorvo for two years. Such designated term shall also apply to incumbent
8a. ‐ Creating a Library Advisory Board (See 7.a.)
Page 180 of 184
ORDINANCE NO.
members who shall havo a term of office coinciding with their term on that
predecessor board. A vacancy shall occur upon the resignation, death, e*
removal of a member, or when that member ceases to be a resident of the City.
A vacancy shall also occur whenever a board member absents himself or herself
for three (3) consecutive regular meetings of the Board or for an aggregate of
five (5) regular and/or special meeting in a single year, unless the absences are
excused by action of the remaining members.
B. No person shall be appointed to the Library Advisory Bboard for more
than two (2) consecutive terms. Tho first appointments to the Library Board
created by this Chapter shall bo of thoso individuals who wore mombors of tho
Library Board in existence at the timo tho ordinance codified in this Chapter is
adopted.
C. Members of the Library Advisory Board may be removed at any time by
the appointing authority and vacancies for the remainder of unexpired terms
shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. The Library
Advisory Board shall, by majority vote, elect one of its members to be Pp/esident
thereof, and may elect such other officers as may be deemed necessary by them.
2-13-65 MEETINGS AND QUORUM:
The Library Advisory Board shall have a regular meeting each month and may,
from time to time, provide for special meetings as may be needed to carry out
the proper discharge of its duties. A majority of the Library Advisory Board shall
8a. ‐ Creating a Library Advisory Board (See 7.a.)
Page 181 of 184
ORDINANCE NO.
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and a majority vote of those
present shall be necessary to carry any proposition.
2 13 7 APPOINTMENT, QUALIFICATIONS, AND DUTIES OF LIBRARY DIRECTOR:
A.—When thoro is a vacancy in tho position of Library Director, tho Library
Board mombors, in conjunction with tho Community Sorvicos Administrator,
shaU—rocommond—one—or more—qualified—candidates to tho—Mayor for
consideration for appointment to that position.
&•.—Tho qualifications and duties for tho position of Library Diroctor shall bo
ostablishod by tho Human Resources Department of tho City with tho
concurronco of tho Library Board. In accordance with RCW 27.04.030, candidates
for tho position of Library Director shall hold a master's dogroo in library scionco
and shall hold or bo eligible to acquire a State of Washington librarian's
certificate. Tho Library Director shall report to tho Community Sorvicos
Administrator, who will sook input from tho Library Board for an annual
evaluation of tho director's performance.
G-.—Tho Library Diroctor may sorvo as an ox officio mombor of tho Library
Board but shall havo no voto thereon.
&-.—Tho salary of tho Library Diroctor shall bo as fixod in tho annual budget of
tho City.
2 13 8 BUDGET AND FINANCES:
Library appropriations and oxpondituros shall conform with tho requirements
of stato law and tho Ronton City Codo. Tho City Council shall havo final authority
8a. ‐ Creating a Library Advisory Board (See 7.a.)
Page 182 of 184
ORDINANCE NO.
to roviow and approve tho library budgot. Tho library budget proposal shall bo
developed by tho Library Diroctor and reviewed by tho Library Board within a
rosourco estimate provided by tho Mayor.
2 13 0 LABOR AGREEMENTS AND PERSONNEL POLICY:
Tho Mayor shall nogotioto labor agreements and salary schodulos for library
personnel, those agroomonts to bo intogratod with tho citywido pay plan,
personnel policies and collective bargaining contracts. Tho Library Board
members shall bo consulted at tho timo of contract negotiations or when policies
affocting library porsonnol or operations aro to bo changed in ordor that thoir
concerns may bo considered.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty
(30) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010.
Denis Law, Mayor
8a. ‐ Creating a Library Advisory Board (See 7.a.)
Page 183 of 184
ORDINANCE NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD:1630:3/29/10:scr
8a. ‐ Creating a Library Advisory Board (See 7.a.)
Page 184 of 184