Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA-04-070, [l fl'l j j~l~~-~~ , . - r -·r' , :. I. 1---::~~ ------. ----. ----; --. ---- . -.. ------l+ _! • ; • • S. TOBIN ST. r I~!_-t-~-U~ L r:-]I mST FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN 'I:::'" .-II·' U ~MERRILLGARDENS @RentooCentr. =-~'I =:":~'; I ~.lIJ I ~ ! I i/ ) I J .. ~ .. ~ O~~ Of= l= orL- I-Ioo~ ~.- 0'-0 r!'"'~ l _..... . ~ ~ , I I City of Remon Department of Planning / Building / Public h-vrks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JULY 14, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PROJECT TITLE: Merrill Gardens SITE AREA: 81,175 s uare feet LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue S SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new 155-unit senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. Specifically, vehicular ang pedestrian access is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Ayenue$outh to the. main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels is proposed from a 15-100t wide alley located east of the building. The applicant is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site in an adjoining lot. Project construction is planned to commence in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More EnvIronment MInor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment MInor Major Information ImP!lcts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water LiahtiGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services " Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet \43 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad itional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. n:Da~L~·L=---tI.=.· .=. ======-:-............... --.... ---... ---.. -. I RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre 104 Burnett Avenue South POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 143 Police calls for service estimated annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in the City. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting, and any construction trailer or storage area should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective criminal and will demonstrate that the area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should be fitted with heavy-duty dead bolts with a minimum 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in construction trailers should be shatter-resistant. Toolboxes and storage containers should be secured with heavy- duty padlocks and kept locked when not in use. "No Trespassing" signs should be posted on the property during the construction phase. These signs serve as a first warning to those that are trespassing on the property. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED COMPLEX Each residential unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or solid wood, with peepholes. The doors should have heavy-duty deadbolt locks with a minimum 1-%" throw and installed with 3" screws. Any external storage areas should also have solid wood or metal doors, with dead bolts and latch guards installed. Sliding windows, including glass patio doors, should have secondary locks installed to restrict vertical movement. These secondary locks need to be placed into the top or bottom of the window frames to restrict vertical movement. Simply placing a sturdy, fitted dowel in the window tracks may be adequate. Alarm systems are recommended for each residential unit, to include the activity room, beauty salon, library, media room, etc. Any stairways at the complex should be constructed of lattice, wood or metal railing so that visibility is possible through them. There should not be solid walls in any stairway that would limit visibility up and down the stairs, or provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for someone to target. 1 '" '. ' .. Balcony construction should also be of lattice or railing -no solid walls, for the same reason. Security lighting should be installed along sidewalks, in stairways, foyers and pathways. Each residential unit should have individual unit numbers clearly posted with numbers at least 6" in height and of a color contrasting with the building. Unit numbers should also be illuminated so that they are easily located. This will assist emergency personnel in locating the correct location for response. It's important to provide confidential entry information (Le., a "secret" law enforcement-only code) to both fire and police in case of emergencies if this building is secured. Proper lighting in the parking garage is especially important. Illumination in this area will contribute to the security of residents traversing from their vehicles to their residences, and will help reduce property crimes associated with unattended vehicles. I would like to discourage the use of remote control garage openers for this property, and have a keypad put in its place. It's common for remote controls to be stolen during theft from motor vehicle incidents, and then used by the criminal to gain access to the building at a later date. This will also negate the necessity of residents having to bring their remote controls into the management office for reprogramming in the event one is stolen. I would like to encourage the developer to consider moving the main roll-up garage door to a more visual location. It's currently planned to be on the alley-side of the building. This area is very narrow, dark, and isolated from view. Pedestrian traffic in an alley way is common, and to have this door so hidden from view will be an enticement for criminals. Latch guards should be installed on any and all doors leading from the outside in. And any lever-handled doorknob, that is on the outside, should be discouraged. These are extremely easy to pry/damage to obtain access inside a building. Where egress might be an issue, bar-releases can be installed to meet Fire Code requirements. This would include any storage rooms, maintenance shops, doors leading into the parking garage, etc. Any doors that have large panes of glass should have an application of security film installed. This can strengthen the glass up to 300% and would assist in deterring criminals from gaining entry by shattering this part of the door. If this product is something you're interested in, please contact me (425) 430-7521. Any separate resident storage units should have latch guards and dead bolts installed. Dumpster locations should be well lit with automatic door closers installed. It seems to be common for residents who have dumpster locations inside their building to prop these doors open. Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense and not too high. Too much landscaping will make residents feel isolated, and will provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as burglary and vandalism. 2 i , ,. ,',. ~ -,; ,'. ':i. " ~. ,I' .' " r-•. ·':. . . ,> , .. ' , .<:, ,-: \ \ . . \. -+-\-.~ MERRILL GARDENS @ Renton Centre ..: 1 / '" '/'y'" / / -_.1 ____ ..1 co L_.l __ l_______ -/ ,,,, / --T--r-' 0 r-1--r--r----~ ",~~. '" '" , z , ",'" "''''''. '\. '. ~'" / / , , ,N, , , , ",'" .....< •••• "'" / '" , z , / '" ...."'/ '" -_l __ L_..l L __ L_J __ l", . < '''' '" / / ' , , ., ' , '", ",'",", ~'\. Y '" 104 Burnett Avenue S_ Renton, Washington WELLS AVE. N. " '. '" , " '" / '" , "" '" -1-1--r-Tl----7 ",r--, ".I'''' ",'" /'" < I, 'v / '" , , , ,'", "', 'A / ~--___ ,_ I I - - _ __ J ~~ / , / , '" , , , , " , , l' J' J' J' i./ ro~~~'" ~.,. ")~, "" // I -T--II--Tir---T---' 1---::)7 +~:/'\.. '. ".')"'/ >;:",)~~~------------j--l--L-j __ l_1L ____ l ____ J -1---;/ /""'" A \/ / ')/ WELLS AVE. S. I I // '" / "< ""~/ / /1'--r-r---------l--T----T--T--r--11-T-------l ",'" '" ~, < '. / "', , , , MUL T I , : : !!. , <!: ''y'' . "v/ / /'" "CHURCH, 'F AM I L y' , , i, : : -'--, "'<"',''y' ,/ /~-TT-j1'-Trrf-J.,--L<-: --fJ I '"", /'" -/ / :::::: SINGLE FAMILY !! ICO~UERCIAL : '/~~"'l' ~, "'-7~~-----J--l--L-J--L-l-_L_J _____ L ____ l __ L_~-JL-------1 / ct. "'''./ WIWAMS AVE. S. I '" ~ o' ,r--' r---, r-T-,--r-T-1--r-T-, / ~~ ~ / """": ' ------, . '" ~ /'" ",'" J J --J I co I I I-/ .:-~~~ / -I: <: : z I J: 1: SINGLE FAMILY J: 1: RETAIL I co / "" ~ . '" I, u ,iii , L J 1 L ,0 '" ~.;:. / ","'MULTI" ::5 I 0 1..._ ----- - --/--I I ~ / ~(j)~"{" / '" " :::;: ,... ,,:J .--I '" ~ ~ / / " ~ , . " I 10; / .;t"C}~ / / FAMILY:: u : co SITE II SURFA1CE PARKING : e/~ / I' I II , (j ~ ----------"-1L---J II I I o~ / I ----"-------__ .1 (j / / ,BURNETT AVE. S.I / // MUL T I F AM I L Y r-~~M~~;c~~~-T--l------------T--r-----TsuRFAC~-PARK~Q~~~J ",'" l' VACANT ' , COMMERC I AL : : COMMER.' _-,---: ---, /L _____________ -----.--L-.l-----___ ---J J-----:~r:;:-i--T 1 : /"'. r--'---, COMMERCIAL J:---1--r : : -,:" : COMMER. I ~-l---I---I r---f---~ 1 ~., I ' -.,l ,'-,": r--, r'I'-'---~' SINGLE FAMILY,:: : ' ------_ 1 j COMM_ L COMM.: : : SINGLE F AM I L Y [_-L-L-J--l--L-J~~~~~L---J > --- ------------' ti L-J ___ l __ L __ JJ__ LOGAN AVE. S. ' ',,- \ ---1., I ; .. ;----1 r-r-l--T----j ~ ~ L.. --.J' , " I l-t I --" ' " I :i I "IlL 10; ., ,I--_--L" __ ~ Z I II I r-l--T----l--1---r-l-T--'--1--r--r t1--r-T-l I " , • •••. I • I ~ • • I W--.l.---.J L--U,~--LL~ __ GJi __ LJ . , , I r"T"n"T"n"T": L----l--L_j __ l __ L_j __ l_]~~ r----T--r-l-----r----T--r-l : COMMERCIAL: : ::, L----J--l--L----t ____ l __ L_ : r----T--r-l----------~~~~ : COMMERC I AL : : ----1 L----L_J __ 1 __________ ~ __ J r-------r----T----l--T----l . , COMMERC iAL: :: , t; L-------L--__ 1 ____ J __ 1 ____ J~ c=~~--r----T-------T----lo; I MULTI FAMILY: :, L----l--L ____ 1 _______ 1 ____ J r----l-----r-l--r-------7 , , " . I I " ',',' TRANSIT / : PARI{ I NG , , ,CENTER / ~ 4 ' , '" I 0 I, ' STRUrTURE ,n I !IJ~ I, I I .... :-., I I I "IU~ I I ' : ::, I ;:!~ / I L----l----J--l-~L---i~t-~ 1/1/.111 r-------r----------1~~f--, , I 0 I I , , I ~151 I I ' I"'~ I , I J I c;~ I , t-.,---" ------n ,I--'j I I I I ' I @ Neighborbood Detail Map .1 I I I I--I I L __ r--, I I , , I-- I I , I I L __ r-- I , , I , I-- I I I I , L __ r--L __ r-- I , I '--, , I , I--I , I L __ r-- I , , 1-• 200' DI2VI21.0p' err.; 'llfi.l2fJrr p. O!=' 111211rr,'I...10flffV11VG ;1/ JUN 'L ? .(" ;.. <I}O~ 1iJ~(}~/JI!~/f) COMMEf\CIAL :-:,._1 •. ,.':" ·S. SECONi) 0 m < dQ) '-QP:! M c::: ~~ 0 z as: m ~? "m N.:t::.":1 (.,',) ~~ <:£,:-"0 ""'" ~"O !JlflJ r"", C:;) AS;: C <:::) ..::-22 2 Z (,) / / / /" )'-"" / 1 / ,<-'" " >' , , "...,. '--_! ____ ",,,_,,,,,,",:_' , '''. ", '( / / ,/ -___ L ___ =~ R------r 1/ / ""', "'-, "'-'> / " ---T--T ~ , , , / -« ',> '",-"'/ / / " £1 I I ' ":"" , , , '~'.' ----"" V , __ _ , '--, " , '~ , ' '<N, -' ---< ~V' /.~/ , "-"'-)-IT! " -lfi [I ~:-::AVE""N.",)/ <~~l~--T,-!-q-T-T-l--f i!!!!! r-rW --,1 1 , t- f , .c' ,,< /"" ,c'", / & / iii ! ! ILL ! en. -j---L-L __ LJ ____ L_LJ____ _ __ 1 '1 ' I I c!.. ,,---,/ Y" "--". --, , J'l ' J ____ / ,_____ ,... _ ' , , "---..1/ /, / "'", / _ L _ __ __ __ ______________________ ~--__ J_::~:=}:=::~) , / ",-"<,, "'-",,-/" ,<~ y~~-----------------,~[~ ~!V~J..-S~A-----Tr-T 1 1 r b:j ---7 '. " " '/ ~ " -~---f' 1 r-_ "f f f f , , ~ ~ ./ ",' / , C". ,-)::---r---------------"i 'I ~ COMMERC I AL , , 1 i M / --/'--, A, /' /. .'V / 1 , , '"UL TJ ' ! , ! , , _L1.. _____ -I. __ "'" _"'_"'1 c--' '7 ~ ---"/ ---, / ' ~ / i I CHURCH ! !F"'LY! i i.l j N,,"::)"-l--- r ----------L-----i ~ I ,6.,.( /, > / G ' " j LL~_, -l ',r, I-UJ / "9/',/< 'y' / ,.i'T-tl-TT1-1-T !! COI",RCIAC ~ CO",ERCjIAL! 0 ---_J[~-=-~~J L __ _ <'" / "'-"" , "T, 'I 'I ' f SINGLE FAMILY f I, 'l l ______ J____ _ __ _ -', \ ' / 'I' I I I" 1 ' S~---------', "--, ---------------------;<--/ ,/ ....: 1 j LL.LL_L,' f[-' --5--AVE .,------1"-----r------[--r-----l ---------/-------;><------_/C---,,,, ------_ __ ____________ ----, f i , iii / "7-----/ """ ---------r---r---, i , CO""ERCI AL! " i ' ---, ---, '--T-r ,r T , , , , RETAIL" 1 j j L ____ _ ,/ / //-1 i ~,!:z:i i i s i NGiE FAMI I y! ! ! ~""""F"'l""""[''''''''-'''t------l ' ,:, <: ~ , , 1 l 1 1 1 J " ", I ' " , , "-, ~ , , --------,-" , L __ -< , , / /) / II " ....... ___ 1..1.._ ----------ii, SURFACE PARKING: i MULTI1FAMILY! J' r ' , , " w "'""' " " l 1 _____ -1 " / ;' MULT I :: ::. , SITE" :, ______________________ _ ' /" il , It _, , ____ .---__ _ / / "MIl Y " u It -------A--V-E--S / / / ! r , B~~N~ II L_,. _____________ , ' , ----, ' / ,L__ -l~---' . --------SURFA-CE-PARK I N_G ____ --J r--------r------- 1 1 --- T [ T[ ,I / ,"' .... ---------,----------'----------, , 'I RANS IT, / / f------- v ;, r ! , , CO'MER.! _----::: --T " , '" T ; ~ , .. / AMI l Y ! COMMERC IAl i I C,"MERC IAl !! --L--:~>r r iii PAR! I NG ! ! ! CENTER; J ;1 / / MUL T IF! VACANT L ' 1 ________ ~ L---::----T .If ' I COMMER,! r STRuqTURE i ,--1 ,I Ij~/ ! ' L ---. "-,-f------~-T i J , 'I " , 'i I ) ~ ~ I , /-------,----COMMERG IAl~--l i I f--' i I I i I I ! !,' .iiffLJ ,-r---,-, -'~-,.J SINGlE FA MIl Y , 'RET All, I , ---L-------L_LL ___ )"' ~ I ' , ---Cl-- rr I r'l p ~ ~ __ L -'-/E LS--" i;w / '/''----I---T-T'-1 COMM, r i 1 SINGLE ""i"t' -L.--Lt-A -----A_v __ . '---'------T---------------/tf~t----l :, , , , COMM'1' :: 1 L_L ____ ---u_ _ _ _ --r---l r ': , " ~15 / : --_L 1 I 1 j ,'---------___ -1 , " f , I-.;s I , ---------j -----------, , , , , , , - -, , 1-- --,-----------------_______ ,-1 , 'I 'f 'I ' f I I ': , , 0(1: L ___ -: --------------l---1 'I f f ":,':, -----r-----------n',' : ----, , , , , , , L~ ", ,.".. ------r---l----, , r 1 , , f, 'L 'L' I ---L --.l ~_-.J __ ---{, , . L.L. r-------i f 1 " :: 'I' I L ' J' 1___ __ __--L__ __ __ , : ' '" 'f 'I "I --1______ I -"-0' "I """ '1M Q '-,\ f--------:!, L' iii L.L_.J N .. hborhood Delal a . ___ .' \ a.. I 'i-L,L __ , f-~ elg --:-----.l....i I I. '0:' <C>- <C 23: --------- --o 50 100 20 O 400 ,---, , : , , , , f-----, , , , : , , , L ___ _ L ___ _ , , , , , , , t----, , , , , , , t----, , , , , l ___ _ , , , , , --II , , , , li , '. ·I!~.II·~ .. II ~ ~--I~I ~::~~ ,.::::..-: OJlU'JU01U'~@ SNamIVD llImIawAI'J t;l ... :: . .. .:: ::;;:;: ',-:; I 6U81d 1001:1 puooes pU8 161!:l1 L.:..J "JI"'1' r-;-ll Filth Floor and Rool Plans I :;:",::; II. L..!J _MERRILL GARDENS @RentonCentre ::--=' I ~f=-- ~ MERRILL GARDENS @ Renton Centre ____ --____ Ji::' __ 1_ ------) - - - - -_l_~_~~ -.. -----·--F-~----=---"-,,-,· __ .__ ' _AVE.S I I i 'I~········~····-·· ................ ~................... . .............. 1.. ,."" .. ,t;~::tK __ I. i, l. .... ~~... ........ ........................11"''''4''-I~J I~ "'" 1\:., "---="--,-----,-= r-------,n "----L_ I:;; I J'- I -----1--+---·~··rl=··~~:.;2·~c~;p.~~=:~:~~~-:;:~~ @ Site Plan ---.. ---. m......."Ua. UI_ -------<>=-- .. a.:C!DI!ICIoa _li_a-m.u.c ~]~~ ~:;"~!~_w.,.s .-. .. .I..m 'LL~t:Dt>1Il"'1! 'AX~lIl~," ~.-~:'~tJOt U"'(C!lC-l:SI 'A1(4l:!)C7.- E-:-e!l~ 'LL~~m·l:1: PAXCD)m·l," ~a , •• -* ... . a..-..... .." T4.lIo.(Q!I,C.zl4 '.AJ[.t~)C1·'OIl GZOG_-. .... ='fI~~ .. Il. ::x~4~1' ~wlnnfA~'// -_"!.."" «'(,'/ / ]]]:~'X<'>."', /-'-mrn"o DJ'IDlm h---; # "" ~ '../'-, ~ r I " .... " . '" y..------_oJ L_ J , ' /':/"yV / J.ffi-.-f} .. ~;:ffrr~-' '~TI-TI:' ... :).-"-.V, / :-Tt TW+ : L:rl':L _g -"--;;'"':/jl1 In;]'~JL _~J L~lL __ ~ /A' >T, r[JW'~----~ '-.:.;j-r-[f-' /§'/~"!'iib 'Q' ~,. iH-_:d: --~ ~'/ , ,-"I,. ---, P,"'-{ , />='::.1-=Ir~TI~-:~'=~ ;=IJ~Tl=~~;' ,~.-. _. -~rfflJl1+: :_, '-'-,' , :rCnFH,rr:'i:t~~fI.J,!"U U_JJ..L, /J " I ~wr1!'UIJl.JJJJIill]JJ ~--l~=, LJ .., • I ---t ,'IT Ii I , ~ Yn Map ~ IOIB_,,-,S """"'~ """"'" "''''''''' nnmm --c_r".. ..... --.-. 1)pVA_ IS-r".1A w __ _ A1 .............. __ _ _Sf IU1li!lper_ ~ ... --." 10 !'" l' :: : ,. Jl TO'IAl m S-2'-"~ --'I,2UII ", ... , Il,":sr 10.0::. Sf lOa-V .".JC!5F n, ... , un" U,:IUF ll.171SF n.r.nr 12,f715f D,l7lsr z:t.1!!JI lI..lliJ( "OJ"" 11,1IlSF ii;iii"v IfJPsr SOShlS5a:is 1,7SDSf <>=--~ .... .... ,. ... -l'"Bar o4anu,. __ ..... -LiAy.ltIib~ 20m51' "..Sf l.3IlSf """ 12.nt!if ·'2 .. ; " B Jj .... @ .2 ~ Ci5 III "" I, I C co Q co ~ i! ... I ",1' !III III CJ~ G ; _I~~~ r-------.J ~ _._-----i-----------. ----.; _.--------------+I-i: S. TOBIN ST. ] ----"_._---------- ~ I .. _-----_ .. ---------- ] ] t---------------------------"1iill---.:----t--t----;---\b,1,--., I ~ II FtRSTFLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN I ~~.:.:~ IH I · III ~MERRILL GARDENS@RentonCentre =--=./ :::~' .;, -';,. ® DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTlNG o lARGE TRElliS ElEVATION ® SMAU TRElliS ElEVATION ® STREET TREE IN GRATE Fifth Floor Landscape Plan Second Roor Landscape Plan -.-~ ~~:.-.. =- " .. ', 1-.11 ::...:;:-,~.<: V· , 11 J,.,:.o:~l = FUN r_ SEC'fOIIATFR~ ="".....:><R.l. WEISMAN.!!~ DllIIIt_1IEI SEIIItf._-=. fI:m-_.__ () HJ-\.J NORTH SCAlE ,', 20',0' '0 1"1° I<mm '1Ii~1 lilil'l I' i!II,'- 1 ,'1 ,llmrrl! ill' 1'1 I( 'I' 1\ Iii' III ,~Ii:~,-Jill! ~ § ~ @) I, I ==================================================================== I I I ~ , i ; , , . ~ , ! I i e I .. I~ -I" ~.~ ~. Ii--~I 'i ,,- F= = -K / I.,.....· 1 ; 1 It MERRILL GARDENS @RentonCentre 0000@0®0000 0 0 000 Ii! II i a I I I ~ 'I 'II~ II I I' I! II dill ~ I § I i H I I I ' I •• I 11--~ U.II ~ I" ~I ~! HORIZONTAL DAJW an or RENTON, NAO 83/91 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTo.l, NORTH ZONE. BASED ON HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 205 AND 1887. POINT 205 BEING A WON IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTlON OF BURNETT AVE ANO 2ND ST,; POINT 1887 BINING A BRASS PLUG itT THE INTERSECTION OF RI'l£RSlOE DRIVE AND WEllS AVE. CONSTRUCTION_ SEQU~NCE: :x..s-=,~~.mI~~·M·Q';';·ri·-­~,;~~l,~1M(-...cAI<rs(:CldllllJC'lDl ~~\:S~=~Tr Cou.NI..IefIIISI-__ 424-1)5M. 111 ..... T ..... M.L.DllS1lfGUlIJfYSPlWZSD(,IIIINGaJNS1ItUCnctI. .~IlIIAD(S_TOCOICS1RIJI:_.fl.AGaLAIIING ~~ I1.NSTou. ... Uft.ltD.CIUOI:!I1LtcIIS1IlJCl'..sPHALl =--Wlll~~ANOGllnDIS. ~~tl.wuv.lOI .. ACCCJIIO,IHCl-.n1~ 1111D1OWllIttSSlXAVAJtOIUolDUl.1111AS1100.n.NID _YA~ DfSI'OS(r;,ltNloUJ_zmlOCA_ATIIO ODSTTO ___ :.t;,.~(F~cA..~~~~:r'~ =.t'm.~'-COI01IKI.rACI .. rnESlMrL!iJtt1S LEGEND ---------DlS~--IIOICM ~, = = """'" = = .... 1DI'l.AL'I[ o!o i i -~, -"'~ ~~~ 'OJ --~.oIA.T mom -=-c:ASv .... :"" :t...,-r.ou.ST-.JlIDCCIO$lIIUClICNOOJllNlfZ,rUDlF_ =~&. ___ H; 4'" GRAPHIC SCALE _neAL OADIM CITY or RENTON, NAW 88 BASEO ON Clrr VERTICAL CONTRtX.. IAARK NUIABER 1939 WITH A PUBUSHED ELEVA.TlON Of 11.383 IAETER5. 11.383 METERS )( 39.J7/12 .. J7.345 FITT. ~~~==S~ L_~!I'l'IIUCMIR.A!PH.tI.T.SIl£WMJCSAICI U1IJ1ES.o.JN01[tIl;llfH(1'Vo/ft. 1.a.LUt._All[ASOflHl:SI1tro __ IIIMl£D(II ~ .. _1,II$a'I'AIL[I[_ ..... 1DUII.'O'S~ -: ... ::=, --"""""""" iW'M'~-stT"' • WASte ST.-m loS. 111m Silt IDGt ..-UJU:SS ~ HOlm ~ ~ :. ~ -0-= 1 • ,. " g ~~~~~'\.~~~ ~; !~~~~;'::~'I ~ f~ ~ ~ ~IIOI 7~~ ~~t .. " li~ [:~tiS~" ~; ,/ ,~~ :;: ;,;: "" j ~;: k-----..., ... /11' -I--;-'~-\;;'::-'~-J":':''":'';'''::"'''l-'---1 1-t --jl----]~ , ,),":;/ I ,'-, , ~ : :-"1' \! ; t,CI) ,II" ; ; : ", "'" I'" !"tz l /1", :: , ;~~ __ ,__ _ .. " ~ :' ~L i I; L =:::: ~' --': ~ ~.--' =":" ~~~" ~~":~; ~ .= _ ~'C 7.-" ~ __ ~-C 7~~ r~t'c ~ ~ [~== i+,=~ '·/"I'H·j . ___ " (1), I' ,~-.. _ -I'} _ _ _ _ '" ...... "' ... ,,",...... ", ,_ , , , , , \ ,;; ,t;t ,1 ; i--------;-r l ~ ~ ,/, ' II ". ~ --,~-I , 1 , _, , _" _. II r I II ~ " -",--, ,:; i ~ I''C;::~ $.' b ! ",_ " I', II' >/ I -', 'I!f. i···· .•. 1;;;;:; I" lr 1 • ~:~1 \., _/~/ j I ' t '" _ >-! it,':--~ " ..' _ _, " ",:-; \:', ',I ",') ; '), " -,' -----,,~-, , " ':J ',{' ' 'j', • , " \'; -l,:::~ :> I I' ' .., '" '~ H '" ;, , " I, " "'->'" ,'-! i 1\:' ", ,~~~,,-;;, ')(~~:~:"'''~,,~::,~: '~'.,.)?l~. I ~,; .i !~; I ~' ~-+ ',1: ""l'~: / /~~'/' , I 'I l } } : , rT 11:'-?:' ": ' -", ''-, ~ ,", "'< /, /1 1'1' '---, -..: /' --,"" \:"'-' l;~: I, \,,' _ .' '-: , ';" / \.-/ I, --, , ~ --, ( '::'\J .. 1,:-. ,,:' '~ , _ _ I /1 , ,!), ";'" .--' , : ' " ,'.. --- -I , ", l_ ll-.--;," '1( J, ,-'j L -</ :\, :"",/ V /b I' I' ~-J ,--/i,,1 --' ,. .' j, , .I. I":. ,,,. c. I. 1 1 .,:)t'< 'm,/ V I • ,I .. , '" If ';j'" ""... _ I ... , , __ "" _ ".; , ': .. c· .el '~j •.. -f;> .. : 1 ~}".:c\--.... ..... ""t' /"0 .. , )""/ v' r ,j. jil, I:':.'L-~~C~ ''2'."li;;.;~'.K:''_ ~~" :. ':':~~'~~"I-';"'l~ULL;1:J1_,">"'\'..t ."',', , . ",.,~,.,' BURNETT AVE. s. .1,~!~ "J '. "" l,.,J ~ ~_ .. ".. b "",U'''' "ti-:.,:. PBOJECTNllii. ~~~ ~~ i.~~~~ UTJ\JTf CONNOT NOTE: .;;:::" ': ~~:~ t!''8:::~.'.~:::,~". ,.,,",... l' ___ -"' ,.-~-... ~-.£it'....,=~-,,--. CALIT1OK: 11<£UXA__ " .. AT...u.~S.;; ~ lHECXlNlRAClORSHALL8ER£SPQfSIIIlERJI~~lHES[P\.AHSORNOT8T .. ~=.::':'~~~==-~~....:: ..... ~=':::~~"W,,='i;~=,.UlCA"" PERMIT DRAWINGS '.~TOIOIFl...c-sT~~ftlIIIlI![[lI[YOY"'" =-~2~1HEHnn~~lHE~UWr11ES~=, ".::o"~~r~f~1[AU.$NIIT""" '[~~II.ro~!.:n.'!lM.I.ltIDl!U..TP~~ 'CCIN~SMIU_ANDfI£LOCII,1tAl,l.IIDIOt£!IONs1tt.\ND'" -~- """"""---1JtI1II~ Q£OCED-:!!l...-- ~[~9'n"""9 PIoM'"9 5I<,,,.,..tI<j ~ "" PfiIh."_gon A •• oc"'"" Crm.ultlnfi/ Enf1/n"u, Inf!. ~/"" .......... ""-. -....... ---'-,~ __ ... __ r .. (':!I)"""" FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 1018 fJERCER ISLAND, WA. 98040 MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE DEMOLITION PLAN Call before you Dig· 1-800-42405555 __ (\No) """'" 04441.00 9W.J!!.Q..rE __ Ilj J HOB1ZQNTAL bADIN CITY Of" RENTON. NAD B3/91 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTE .... NORTH ZONE. BASED ON HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 205 AND lBB7. POINT 205 BEING A ... ON IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION Of BURNETI AVE AND 2ND ST.: POINT 16B7 BINING A BRASS PLUG AT THE INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE ANO WEll.S AVE. WRDCAL DATUM ClTY Of RENTON. NAVO BB BASEO ON CITY VERTICAL CONTROL MARK NUIoISER 1939 WITH A PUBUSHEO ELEVATION OF 11.363 "'ETERS. 11.363 IoIETERS • 39.37/12",37.345 F"EET. I';'.": i:en :\;:~ T i f I .. '0 1-/" .\. /.; en: \/Ji1 '! s· a -!".~. IED.e •. ~~j~ J1I:::: . ..... '. -'··".::S:-=i~==~i:=~-.·~.:J==-:'::~ /, -Z-\." '\1 \\:i . -'-'--;,.-~ -.--.~< ---_. -,-_ ... _--..... -, !~ ~;. BURNETT AVE. S. ~~~~~ !.J~t (;t:::: (/blfi!,j E~q_,"'l _"''''l ~ P.nhanegOfl Anodale. C(III$Ultlng Engineer •• Inc. ,,~<-.~ ... -..... • ~ " ~E rf~~~t~~~~~~r;~ -. ,£ I~ ~~ " I'~ .--.----------IV.--~~~ 1S 1._ ""'" " "-~ " __ II:~'0.tlh'. ... -._ •.. _ ... -., .ii",'fi::.C:'-=:C.CC'.·ci. i';.·'='CCF'I' '".- 'k ~~ GRAPHIC SCALE m , ~ .. ---:'·.~?~';R?r,·'tlllftlT'l-;:::~ :', .""~;~ ~~:,:):~:::: .... ~~:-,."'"'"'""""""~ Call before you O,g. ;r~~>;;~~+~"'f~¥:~~c=:;:f~f~oi~l~F ~. e. ~ ~ ~.! \. FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.o 30X 1018 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 f<~r~ "'-' ~~,"i' .• /<~~;.:..~,'~':;. . ., PERMIT DRAWINGS .. ~ ... MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE 04441.00 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 9fH~(f __ :Il III d z o III .... m :Il ~ :Il ~ .... 0 ." 0 Gl :Il » Gl » • ." Elm; m 0 z C/l C/l C .-:Il < .-m 0 -< S ~ ~ ~ ~ . g r " ~-.. ~d~ ~ ~~ n '" [ ~ ~ 0; \ Q.()o ..... ..::'/S-;::~ 000;:00075 ao_Jl.loI l·r....::hlo<. 0007200148 no< ... JIoII 'f'ClK.N_JO· [(l';;~:~ ( ,TtlV .. UJ ....... III 1 C :1 JJ z 0007200073 \ \ SEE SHEEU , , 0007200,311 I t~ .i !~ ,"'r:. i; 00072oolJ9 " i~i 10007200130 ;1 ., :~i :'::'" , """",,' I I I" iii i~l~i r:H , II, \ ~ "a \ \ \ !~i'! \ 'n \ \:;l! . . 'II \ ~:1' CMl~(_,,_·_ i \ i~ fl.'a.~rs~ \ »i II < \1 !Tl ' ~ lI.. 'I I, I lij! tL-_ : ii __ _ " I i-'--, r'-------- /' " i! '>_ /1 I, I 71JI50~1:'5 ~~§! iI-! -~ ---I ..... \ \~ J ~ '~'_'LC~c ___ ,--... c ~ -16'=-' -~ ~".-------, , , ' -'---;-:!--~~~'" ;'~ I ' =t.;'1 ' 'I' ", L __ .•• " '-!.! -il ,_ •• <_ •• _ •• -~~ i,~ ,; l~ -J i'Z :" ~dl ".pr"· \ ~ ~~ ':1~:"~8I \ -'d.~~. ,-"f, / ,'~ i\ / J:l'i." / . ......., : Jy,~~i;// >i/) :' ~. ..... , ct .... ·,,· .'"Pq.fOll.lIn !ffi}b -----~ AnadII_ C~_ E";-" .. ~ ;:,:':;-:':::-~~ -,. ~ -.-.- iii ! I RENTON CENTER I ',~" L· : II; 00(17200,4$ -,~ ~'-. ,I''-E~~~:t ; .... ~_""l I[Q""","."...J5G ~iii -" 72~'~1<!~~ LEG;~~ ••• " .. ~_~ _______ _ ~ :"~:":'J[~ 9<_ ........ 1IONC(JOnta."Ol'i£ ~ 00 ~-.cuS (SSf<;Il) .0. JI1)'O£I/lJ11JOI'Ol[ _ C!J • ......,.aJt !il ~."'.uosroonot:. [!]om::=== .... ' H;:',:,;~'~, :=~~E • .-Sl£U POST .... Wl ..... , 8['" ~ 1'\:5''''' itCO<II"{OOOI.ISTMEt o .-,~, 5 <(>.HJ ,'5(0 """'-"'1:'" _____ (VOlI"'-' _"01.0'1(5 _ _____ ",(;."_Of,.,,,INCS _____ 0"""""-__ • __ w.n.,,'" __ • __ 5_'·· .. 5( .. ·, ... __ • ___ 510lI>l000""" ___ < _____ ~.suot{ __ """ ___ uooClICJPOUNO0'0II(1 ,OO(s __ ""'_ _ _ 0'1[19<[00 lMS ______ UfoD(.""OUoll)l(,[_,,"(5 __ ~. __ ._ ••. _ QI ........ rt"IQ: _. ____ ._ ••••• __ 0 ____ ( 'flOC[ _ •••• ___ • ______ WOOD fTNCl GRAPIfIC SCALE 2~~04r (mf"E'!T) I Illch ~ 20 ' •• l V'I" .. ". 'We",", ,e. r ;]~ .• I r.· .. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 0444t10 FOIl MERRIL GARDENS LLC HrlJ-(7--2....- II , ft.:- HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY Of RENTON, NAD 83/91 WASHINGTON COOROINA T( S'l'STE~, NORTH ZONE. BASED ON HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 205 AND H187. POINT 205 BEING '" IojON IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION Of BURNETT AVE AND 2ND 5T.; POINT 1887 BINING A BRASS PLUG "l" THE INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND WELLS AVE. VE8DGAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON, NAVD 88 BASED ON CITY VERTICAL CONTROL ~ARI( NU~6ER 1939 WITH A PUBUSHED ELEVATION OF 11.38) ~ETERS. I1.JB) ~ETERS " ,39.31/12"'37.345 FEET :;;/ z' .......... -"''''-'' _. . "'-.. ----... . -.- ~, r" ~wcurEX ::. I -~';r~ -, -. GRAPHIC SCALE ':' ~.---j ...,. "",).z.",.?'1!:.;:C:"'tl'HII'I )~IIl';:,~_---.: " ~.'t::" n~· ~2E ~I 1-, enl , r: -. -. ..~. • . • "m ':' . 'f '.' \,,: ~, 1IIIIIililllll\-lj~lll!.m'~!~IHI· q~dr ,"; , I I I' I I I;; I! ~"-'-'. --. --'. --! ~ __ I. __ .. __ ; . 2.~' --~·~L. -----.. -f~~:.~-~~~:== ' [)(TAl. stnC12. --------........ _-----~--~......:..~- .........-- -I '._ ,I. H ·-------?----__ L·~·· BURNETT AVE. S. .. -.-i . ~ ~;;;:;;; ....... ".,:'"-;;;:",,,,, ... E" ... ~~:··,;;~ __ "" ~.m "'_ ..... ", ._.......,,, _, __ ,,_ . _ ,,,,;,,,.,..,, ,-...., •• , .... , .. 1·10)."· ... ·, , 'v FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.O BOX 1018 IJ(RCER ISLAND. WA 98040 -----PERMIT DRAWINGS MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE GRADING a. TESC PLAN Call before you 0'9. "' .... 04441.00 H[I~(J __ ~l !~ 1/2"X." [XPANSION t.lA.T[RIAL 1/."R AT JOINTS ............. '/2"X4-EXPANSION I.I.A.TERIAL l/~"R AT JOINTS 1/2"R 1/2")(S" EXPANSION ~ATERIAL CURB RETURN ONLY 1/2-R PAV[I,IENT AS PER PLANS STANDARD CEIJ. CONC. CURB ANO GUITER SECTION A-A ~ JOINTS: ouwwY.DHTli S>W.l BE P1..OCfO >tOT TO ElCCttlIl~' CIC _lESS ntA~ 10' C/C. tNE"r S""'-l NOT BE LESS"!NAI< 3/1.-'" n«:~N£'S5 AIC) StWJ. lIE nl£NO(D 1-!IUOW I><E CUTTtIt UNE ~~= ~PUoCfOA' >uCOlO.lOlNTSAS (l:I>[ClfOlN f><ClHffQ .o.NOShOL' WI€1I£THESlD[WAU(ISTOIlEI'I.AC£OOCIIINUMCIJ1II8I.oooI)CUTT[lI.THE.IDIIo1SOW..1.B£ACO\.DJOINI g~E:=~~ ~B£~T~~ =:~~.~~ ~ ~=R~'r;t2;:;;">LK5 SlW.l.CONrORWT01ll(~_SOTClASSB('/<1""">lR[II"I_"U.T r.tECONCIl"ITE5hAi...!. .... Y[ABI'!OOYf1NI$II .. n.AU.[DC£S ........... Al\'j-TOOL£l)f'1Oo/SI1 SI..18GRAIXCO ... PACTIONSfIAll8EtolI(OI()OIJ"I(lIPIlOClOllj ~ S1DEW"'k~ AND PL ..... 1'!R ST~P ALrullihlU SlOf.AL~ N[.T TO CURB ("0 PL.NT[R STllP) "'""- ~(TlP) ~Q%~ I .. q..'~ .......... ~ ....... d'A~ ORIV!:w ... VQRAllEY / -.................... y m ~r:;'N; ~~~~~S ~ II)-CO ... I,IERf;lALZowr 6-RESlO[ .. nALlONl ./-;" ~~.;> ..-:>.0.---.,..-............... ~#"-....... ..::::$' " ;-<~> ;~ .,' 10-COUU[ItClAL ZONE 6-1I(5'OfNnALZ()N[ ro'C;:!~€~ ~:~O;'DtC~~C~~E~IIER QNCQl,tI,lERCI"'LAPPRC"'CNfS(lrP) I OUI,II,IY JOINTS SHALL BE PLAC(D NOT TO £>CEEO 15' CIC NOR LESS It<AN 10'c/e Tl.(ySHAlL NOT BE LESS IHA .. ~/'6" ~ It<IC~N[SS ~I<O SHALL BE 2-'10" OEEP CURB AND GUTTER SHO'M"1 I-'O .... 'EVE'l. OTHER CURBS "'AY BE USED (SEE saNDARD P:"'A.'lS) SECTION A A ---! 1-6" .Kl."£3"""'" -I ~18" DETAIL A ",P~'" MOtlOllTHIC Cu'<B S~[ NOTE 5 STANDARD CEIJ. CONC. CURB AND GUTTER 2 112-It<Ru JD<NTS S ..... U BE PL ... CED AT BACK. S'OES "''10 FRQNI(BOtiNO CURB) OF "'PPROACH. "'NO IN CURB/GUTT1:R TO 00 ...... ' JOINTS caa:MT CONCETE APPROACH TYPICAL smn.w:: ~~[;:N~~;:!L~ :;"?tE:!(~L;~~ ~~O""II [ .. TllAINfO FOR DRlVftAYS AND .w.EY'9 e ADOPI'ZD "'<>PROACN SMAll "OT BE POURED tNT[C~AL ..... TN CURB ANO GUTTER. BUT ...... BE POURED e ADOPm> +. + an CJlIIIImII ~~::~E~~~;:~~R~~itBB~~~"O~T~~,~~"~ral +(tR + arr • ...-=-=:= ~R:'C:O;~:n:..':;:E:l ~~T~~. :~[~RI::yt~l~RYI~~::[/RLI..r =-=:= ~ OWG. NAME: FR-Q2 SP PAGE:fOO7 AlUT """OIN ....... I •• , -"," , DWG. NAME: FR01H SP PACE;I'"~ r{hlr~l~ 1 .-/ L / ..... -~, I :O~=.C:'=A-,~-a,"",-~-N l:1!l.tl'1..AtI B --' ~ ... ::;Otf~· ~.;'%: so a'::. 'td ---1 .. _ ~,I! TT L -.i l/l"( ....... _'OO· 1 ""'-"'-'" A-.J ~ r-'.-'~ +:('~,.::.. _." cp--1 '~:·I ;';:·1 El? ::=:====J-fi~~~",~, ~ IWE..fLillllll! cr •• ,,_. __ ~~. IlC"""_{SCES • ...,""""'-""" rOllOll4[RQ,OtIID£'iICN'i1 ~ I:-';;"-~'~:::~ ~~-.~~ ot:(J"[O~ ~,;r ••. '"i' .. " L •. _ 1>4CKf"N[D(DCII;17-..c>o TOf\JU.[)(·""U~ ~~ tj-~-.. _:,:r.!rl -_~c....L=-"-,:-~:: -~~. c. ~ _ *.- T I ~ ~,.,-.-~ -1 fOfI.U,DE·"'UtuIIII SEJ:Il!l!UdI .,.'- ..... I'U"MMC; IS n;I • goo,( ,.'" ... u .. ....oxD oo£t ... COlA" CEKENT CONCETI smn.w:: :';.1ij~~~'=--I7.":/=::'.:'~::':':"~ AlfD APPRO.ACII DETAILS '~:~:':::I=~~Zs:';:~:'·"" e ~~-_.~._ .. ,_"".n __ , .... ~~, ." • o<1"[QtA,,,,,,,Q,IIIII 1DJCrIIID.u. U'l'D&m:4~1 [ ... 1_. owe. NAttIE; FR-OJ SP PAGE: 1'"005.2 liINt IM~'cr ~ ".~~, -.I·.~. ~ 1.:". (itJ 2) ~';;;,~;;:.,": ~"'.~I:':~:"'"'''"' E"" __ ~;:;;~' . ;." .... ;-10:; , ....... , ~~' ,_:'~.,,;;~-;-!.':;::. ~~<?>~[:! ~-~SPMAlT CC»ICREl£ CLlSS -e- .-CR\ISH£l)ROCJ{CCU'ACT"EOTO lI~lI: IoIA>nIUI,I QDlSIN ~I(OTO 95l1:IoIAJOIIUI,I[)(NSlTY CRUlHED "OCK Al.1"&RNATIVE ~1¢JNJG"'l~t~~~ALT ED st"'lE:NTS _ FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT p.O. BOX 101B U[RCEf.l ISLAND. WA 980",0 Call before you Dig· 1-800-424-5555 ",--_(\ISO) PERMIT DRAWINGS MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE GRADING NOTES & DETAILS HEI~li(J i ' ,~ il!' I ' !~ Il!; ~~!j 1 ":.E!f iI'" iii;: ~ I ! i :l' ~ '""'" 1. FOR SHEET RUNOFF OR FOLLO'MNG DISCHARGE FROI.! A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POOD. II Tt~-----BURY eOTTOt-A OF fABRIC 2. ~AX\MUt.l SLOPE STt[PNESS PERPENDICULAR TO FENCE LINE IS 1:1. t(9lIEO~ ~A TERIAl IN S" BY 12" TRENCH fiLTER fABRIC WATERIAl ::!~~~~ ~t:~~ ~;;K':n::7lL----~l ~f TF~C~~H F~~~E O~ A~~I~H ~DES -f THE SURFACE. 2" BY 4" WOOD POST AlT: STEEL fENCE POSTS. BRUSH BARRIER NTS " R/W ~ § I ~~ ~~ / EXlSTlNG GROUND ~~ ~8 C2" ~:s ...... e~i~ R_2S'IJIN EXISTING ORIV(WAY RA~P OR SITE ACCESS ROAD E.I..m ! 3. t.lAXlJ.lVt.I SHEET OR OVERLANO n.OW P .... TH LENGn-! TO TIfE FENCE OF 100 FT. 4. IF 50~ OR LESS or THE SOIL. BY \If(IGHT, IS 'INE PARTICLES SMAllER TH.A.N THE U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NO. 200, THE [OS SHOULD BE EQUAL TO OR SMALLER THAN THE SIEVE SIZE THAT asx or THE SOIL CAN PASS THROUGH. 5. THE TRENCH SH"LL BE BACKFllLEO WITH J/4~ WINIMUM OIAt.lETER WASHED GRAVEL. 5. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REt.lOVED WHEN "THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USHUl PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STA81UlED. 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REPAIRS SHAll BE t.lADE IMMEOIA TEL Y. rn.TZR FABRIC nHCB DftAD.. e ADOPftD ... :::-.: LftIl&mI2,1'11 owe. NAME: BR21 SP PAGE: B0615 1. Use ( to 8" quarry spoils or crushed roek for $urfacin';J 0$ shown. ~otenol WIth 'fines is not acceptable. ~at~~1 l~O~o~i~;:~~d If~t~thth$eh~~~~ l;i~~i~e~:dw~:. necessary to InSlJre T'EWPOltlRT CO:tr.mrucnoN ENTIWICE ~ :.:-..: ~ Lftll&ml2,1'11 OWC, NAME: BR23 SP PAGE: B068 .tIlUI! fI'H ,---Qfiiifi1!../ '" .,. "--~ -'"'' "'-"" ..=":-':'-'. ''''''''-=, O£O!D~ f~~1 = -.'= 3;~~;) • POIICU!I IIOTTOIII .~ • NOTt,lMISD£T ..... ISONl.ySCt€IMTIC. IM'ItlSDl'flS.lU.ClftDmtJMOS.MIN.D.5C.f. OI'SlOfVlCL !>I["'lNGTODE\IOAltRlltESI'OREIlSEDlW£NT.NlOII£Rf\.(IOI.AICleAN lI((A$l.y_M@. ('ATCH BASIN INSERT ',"".oI:Q.J1IUI.ATtDUII1IoIf1'ITOHDllMOIJIC)T11En..TUilfA8RII:PROTECTJ:IIISHAUII(~ "II[OOAIUY. $tIIIoOtHT5!WJ.IIOTII(RDICMD"TH"TUil.ANDIILLS[OI1oI[NTOOUS'TIIE OISPOS[DOI'ASf1U,.ON-SlltO!lIWll£l)(JI'f"-5tfL ~IM'ISCJIIIDCTIN'II<lCII.lCH_III$(A'fSlW..lBERIJoIII:MD_!>I[$£t1IIIOIT_ >tEr1LT(lIloIEDIOoflllllntE,,$£lITswu,. lSCM!CN..fOft!lafl<f(1IIbISOFCll.reH_PROTEC'IIOfL\I'IlI<{ ;;ncNTItO,Tf .... c;II,OrI)UO,lLy.Cll.reH_PI1OTU:T1DN'MLLf ... .·"IIOlIOlMrAMDI'ROPIJIL' FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.o. BOX 1018 IAERCER ISlAND, WA 98040 EROSION CONTRct. NOrB 1. BEFOREAHYCC»lS1R\.ICTlCNOROE\£l.CIPI,I[NTACTMTYOCCURS. ... PRECC»ISTRUCTION WEETING WUST BE HELO IIiIITH TliE CITY CF RENTC»I DEP,.JUIoIENT OF PUBUC WORKS, OESIGN EHClNE£R 2. ... LLLAjITSCFCLEARINGNIOAREASCFIlEGET ... nC»lPR£SEAVA1lONAS PRESCRIBEDOH THE PLAN SH...u.BE ClE.lRLYf\..o\GG[D IN THE FIELD At«>C8SERIIED DIJRINGCONSTRUCTIC»I. l. 1J.LREQUlREDSEDIIoIENTATION/ERaSlC»lCONTROI..fAClLlfI[SWUSTBE CONSTRUCTED AHD IN OPERA'llC»l PRIOR TO LAND CUAAING AAD/OR OTHER CONSTRUCliON TO INSURE 1liAT S£l)IWENT v.DEN .... TER OOES NOT EHTER THE J<lANR ..... OR~AGESTSTEIoI, 1J.LEROSIONA/<IDstDIM£J<lT' ... CIIJlIESSHALLBE W"INTAIN£DIN"'SUlSF'ACTORY~TlONUNn.SUOIllW[1li"'TCI.E"'~G.I.ND/OR CC»ISTR\.ICTICIN IS COYPlETED AHa POttNTl ..... fOR C»I-SlTEEl!OSIONH.t..S PASSED 1liE IWPlOIENTATlOH, _TENAHCE. REPLACDLNT.-.NO "I)I)ITlONS TO ~~Etn ... TlONCO .. fn:tct.SYSTEWSSH ........ BET11ERESPONSIB.JtYCFTHE 4THEEROSIC»I"""O~ENT ... TlC»lCONTROlSYSTEIoISDEPICTE'DC»ITHlS DR"''MNG AAE INTENOED TO BE WlNIWUU REOOREIoI[NTS TO IIEET AHTlCIP"'TEl) SITE CONDIllCJtS. #.SCONSTRUC'llONPfWGRESSES.o.NDIH)lJlECTEDORSEASQ\I ..... CONDITlOtCSDlCTATE,tHEPERI.IITTEESH1J.LAHTIO""'TETliATIICIA[EROSIONNIO SEDUoIENUTlON CQNTROI..fACI./TlES _U.BE NEC[SSAAYTOINSIJR£COMPl£TE SlLT ... TJONCONTRct.C»ITHEPftOPOSEDSlTL DURING THE c:c:uISE CF CONSrRUCTlON, IT SHN.L BE THE OEII.JCA.lION Nfl) REsPONgflUTY OF THE PERIoITTEE TOJ.OORESS.IIO'NEWCONDlTlONS l'HAT W"'Y BE CREATED BY HlS.lCtlVInES NIO TD PROWl( ADDITIav.!. FACIlITIES, O'IER NIO .t.IIO'IE _ ...... REOUIR£lIENT5. AS WAY :~Dll:TO~~TE;.:s::ctNT PROP£FITlES NCl WATER QJN.JTY CF THE S. .>.PPfIDV ..... CFTHlSf"LNIISFOIIEROSIONjS£OIUEHT ... TlC»lCONTROlQNlY. ITOOES NDT CONSTITUTE AH .>.PPfIOV ..... OF STORU OR.o.aN ... GE D£SICH, SIZE J<IOIIl()C.fI,TIDN OF PIPES, RESTRICTORS. OIAHtIElS. OR RETENTlON FAWnES- S. DlJRJNGTliETlUEPERIOOCFNO'oUI9[Rl TI1ROUOIWAROI ll ......... PRO,£CT 0ISTlJR8EDSOIL.t.REA5GR£ATDl1liAH~,OODSOUI<REFUT, Tli ... TI<RE TO BE lEFT UNWCI!KElIfORUORE1li""T'Ml.IIE(ll)HouRs.SHmBE~BYw.u:H, SooOIl'lG. OR PLJ,STlC COIlERlNG. 7.IJ<lAIO'ARE"'\llHICHHAS8(EHSTRlPPEDCFIlECETAJION.o.ND'MlERENOfURTHER Yo'ClAI( IS AHTlOP"'TED FOR'" PERUXI CF 30 D ... YS OR WCIA[, oI.I.l. DlST\JRBEO .t.REAS IoIUSTBEIWW(D1"'TEl.YSTIoIIIUZEOIII1liIolULOllNG.GR"'SSP\.AHTlt4COROTHER IoPPROIlEDEROSlC»lCOlnRct. TR£,\TWENTJ.PPUC.Io8LE TO THE TlUE CF'I1:NI IN OUESTlC»l. GRJ.SS SllDING ALONE 'Mll BE ... CctPTIoIIlE ONLY DURING THE NONTliS OFJ,PRlLTliRDUGtlSEPTEUBERINa.uSllot SEEOIJ<lC.II .... PROCEED,I'fO'/IIEIIE!I, fItlENEIIER IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PERUlME. BUT WUST BE AUCUEHTED IIiIITli 6u~~~E~oA~ ~:ER~.TIoIENT .t.P~1IED BY TliE CITY CF R04TON. Il FDR ........ EROSKlN/SEIlIWENUTlC»lCONTRct.PONDSlIIHERETliEDEIoDSTORAGE 0EP1li EXCEEDS 6 INCHES, ... F'£/fC[. A WINlWUIol OF lFUTHIQIISR£ourFlED, IIiIITH l:.ISlDESLOPES. 9. A TEIoIPORJoRY CR"'1IEl CONSTRUCT1C14 ENTRt./<IC£, 24' )( ~ )( e· CF 4-TO ~-INCH D1J.IoRRYSP,I,l1.SSH.o.u.BELoc.o.Tm"'T,o.u.PClNTSCF~IO.l..ARIHCRESSANIl EGRt:SSTOTHECQNSTRUCTIONSlTL PERMIT DRAWINGS MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE TESC NOTES & DETAILS Call before you O,g. '·8DO·424-5555 --- mT C2.21F __ ,---__ 23 3/0-__ ---,:_-, ,~ / S1D~OTOETA'LS£[/1 IA'L 0"":; 0-7 UYEt.l'<(;PAO(8) 1/8"3/0">2'1'-lq 1'1 .L-""+[";' ,.".;z::::: i --t:j~': 10 .b /Gf~.~~ ~~Ey8'THI0( s ~ It,~ .". ~ ~G' /' 7~" I --II-,,".~L.,,": 1-:o.o~ "'1'1< rA .... r O~'llfD ANO lA_a Hili LOCI<"C; BOLl'S .nIhCII WftD VftlnT 1 US( ... ," TVI() UX1<""C; oo..rs S/S"-11 Ne STAINlESS S}fH NPE lO4 ~. J/'-lOUD ux:IIIIG CUftI :~~Fl3:tr{~1~E~::~n.?~:~~~E~~.TK»<S ~ ~- S COV£R SM.lI.l ~"'YE IH( WORI) "oIlA"-IN 2-1010< RAISED Un[AS '0' === ·,,·]::----r'i·· """'" ,~"'" ~ -I Cf'D!!M!PfSH"i'!fOAr'/!ll[~;.:B£lW[[N ,,~ ~ c:uaa::a'..=':= e ~fIIl) DftWI .... _-=-== ~ NOffS 1.Sl..0T rORYEO""'O 1lEC£SSED fl)II s/ll'-n Ne. 2-SOCIt£T 1<1(40 t~~ci~~~~s;:o~:~ARO SP£~"'~ ~=~"-:.-" =.-:.= / .•. :,':::,: ... --:.. 00:=--='/ -;~0~~;~ .,~ , "::'"--.:::.:..----- '~~~~:E~: If.JIl =~r~ ::-:.:: -::c ~ ::=:!:: ... --~~ --;-.-.;' ~---:;--:; ;:- i~~~ , [~;;[~77~:_·..:-;i; i:~-=-.'-....- 8 CRAfEISQl'WPr<: FCA.lNORl 1$N5OG 011 [QUAl. A/J!t"'» ~ . '--;::{2~ L ' < ..... ~ " ?1i:(:::"~'J'~ . ---·-I~f':~i· ------4iillk. ~?~ ------~ " :~~~~;. , :::."::'::--.. _--""-, =-~.=----.. - • !'.=.",:,=."::.."":::::"""'::-. --"-"--~"'-- --I=- ~C'~o==:d~ ~ ~;;;;,:"-:.~ A"="":'";;::"'~'" E""'_';";"~' ."" ~-.... -...... . ............ ," ... ---. ...... "''''':''''0'' '·000·......... ""'''tl'''''''' K ... _ ._ FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.O. 80)( 1018 MERCER ISLAND. WA 98040 STOIN WATER 0fWNAGE NOltS 1. BEfORE NIt CONSTRUCllON OR DEVELOPMENT JC.DI'"'Y OCCURS, A PR[- CONSTRtJCTION METrINC MUST BE HELD WITH THE CITY Of R[NTON DEPAAnlENT OF" PUBlIC WORKS. D£SICN ENCtNEER. 2. All CONSlRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORONK:E WITH THE "1888 STANDARD SI"£CIFlCATIONS fOR RCWl. BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION" PREPAAED BY W S.O.O.T .. AND THE MlERIC»! PU8LIC WORKS ASSOCb\TION (APWA). AS MlEND£a BY THE CITY Of RENTON DEPARTMENT Of PUBUC WORKS. l. THE STORM DRAiNAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPRMD PI.ANS WHICH ARE ON FlLE IN THE DEPAATMENT Of PU8UC WORKS. IHf DEVlATlDN fROIot THE APPROVED PlJoNS WILL R[QVtRE WRITTEN APPROVAL F"ROIot THE CITY Of RENTOI'! DEPARTMENT Of PU8UC WORKS. DESIGN ENGINEER OR STORIot WATER UTlUT't. ... A COPY Of THESE APPR()'.U) Pi..ANS IotUST 8E ON THE J08 SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS !:i. CATUM SHALl BE U.S.G S. UNlESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY CITY Of RENTON OEl"AATWEI'!T Of PUBUC WORKS. REfERENCE 8ENCHIoIARK N«l ElEVATION ARE NOrro ON THE Pi..AHS I. AllSEOIMENTAllON/EROSlONfACtUTIES IotUST BE IN OPERATlON PRIOR TO CLEARING N«l ElUILOING CONSTRUCTION. AND THE'( MUST BE SATlSfAClORllY IoIAINTAINEDUNTl1.COHSTRUCTlOH/SCOMPlETED~THEPOTENTl.o\LfORON-SITE rROSIONHASPASS£O. 7. All R(TEHTlONjO(rENTlON fAClUllES MUST BE INSTALLED AHD IN OPERATION PRIOR TO OR IN CQtoLJIUNCTION WITH All CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY UNlESS OTHERWIS£ N'PRO\rU) BY THE [)(PAAnI£NT Of PUau:;: WORKS. STOR'" WATER UTII.JTY. I. CRASS S(ED"'Y BE APPUED BY HIl"I'ROSEEOING. mE GRASS SEED IlUCTUR£, OTl£R~ClTYorRENTotlAPPROVEOSTANOAADIoIIX£S.SHAI..l.BESIJ8I,IITTEDBY A I,.,VIOSCAPE IoRCHIT[CT AND APf"RCNED BY THE DEPNmIENI Of PUBlIC WORKS, STORW WAtER unuTY. 9. All PIP[ AND APPURTENANCES SHALl BE lAID ON A PROPERlY PREPARED fOlJNClATlDN IN ACCORIlANCE WITH S£CTKlN 7-02.3(1) Of THE CURRENT ST ... TE OF WASHINCTotl STAtIDIoRO SPECIfICATION FOR RIlo\D ANO BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INClUDE NEC£SSoI,RY L.£VELlNG or 1H£ TRENCH BOTlOlol OR THE TOP Of TI-£ fClUND,I,TlQN IoIATERIAL AS WELL AS Pl...ACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF" R[QUtRED B£O[lUoIG IoIATERIAL TO UNiFORiol CRIoOE SO THAT THE ENTIRE lENGTli OF" DiE PIPE WIll. BE SUPPORTED ON A lmIfORiollY O£HSE UN'fIElOING SASE. All PIPE BEOClING SHALL BE W'WA ctASS ·C". WITH THE EXCEPTION Of P'.e PIPE. All TRENCH EW;KFlll SHAll BE COiolPACTEO TO MINIMUloi 9S~ FOR PAVEiolENT AND STRUCTURAL FILL AND 80~ OTHERWISE PER ASTiol D-15~7-70 PfA GRAVEL 8EODING SI-W.!. BE 6" OYER AND UNDERP.V.C.PIPE. 10. (W.VANIZEO STEEL PIPE AND ALUMINIZED STEEL PIPE f01l. ALl OIVJJoiAGE FACIUTIES SHALL HAV[ ASPHAU TRfATiolENT 11 OR BETTER INSIOE AND OUTSIDE. II. STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE PERWITTED WITHIN 10 fEET or WE SPRING UN( OF />XVSTORiol OIVJNAGE PIPE. OR IS fEET fROt.ITHE TOP OF" ANfC ...... NNEL BANK 12. -"ll CATCH BASIN GRATES SHAlL BE DEPRESSED 0.10 fEET BELOW PAvrMENT eM,. Il. OPEN CUT RO.o.o CROSSINGS WROUGH OISTING PU8UC R1GHT-Of-WAr Will NOT 8E AllOWED UNLESS SPECIFlCALLY APPROVED BY CITY Of RENTON DEPAATM(NT OF PUBLlC WORKS. DESIGN ENGINEER . H. ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION Of ROADSIDE DITCHES. WHERE REOUIREa. SHALL BE Of SOUND QUARRY ROCK Pl...ACEO TO A DEPTH Of I FOOT AND MIJSl IoIEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 4°_B·/40~_70~ PASSING; 2.-40 ROCK/JO~_40~ PASSlNG;AND-2"ROCK/l0"-2~PASSING l!:i. AlL BUn.DING ~SPOUTS AND FOOTING QRAtNS SIiIILl BE COHNECTED TO THE STORiol DRAINAGE sYS1EI.I. UNlESS APPROVED BY THE DEPAATiolENT OF" PUBlIC WOR .... S. Q[SiCN ENGmEER OR STORIoI WATER UllUTY. AM ACCURATELY DIMENSIONED CCRllFlED ASBUIlT DRAWING OF THIS ORAIN-"GE 5"fSTEiol WILL BE SUB¥mED TO THE CITY Of RENTON UPON COMP\£TION • 11. ISSUANCE Of THE 8UIUXNC OR CONSTRUCTlCH PERIoIlT BY THE CITY or RENTON OQ(S NOT REUE.VE WE OWNER Of THE CONTINUING LEGAL OBlIGATION .IoI'IO/OR lJABUTY CONNECTED WITH 5TORiol SURFACE WATER DISPOSITION. ruRTHER, WE CITY OF" RENTON 00£5 NOT ACcrPT />XV OB1JGATION FOR THE PROPER ruNCTIONtNCi AND MAINTENANCE Of THE SYST£I.I f>RaoIIOEO DURING COHSTRUCTlON. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHAll BE RESPONS!B...E FOR PRCMDING AOEOUATE SAfECUARD. SAfETY O£VICES. PROTECTM: EQUlPiolENT. flAGGERS. AND IHf OTH£R NEED£D ACflCIIoIS TO PROTECT WE UfT. HfALTH ...... 0 SNTIY or HIE P'UBUC. AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERfORMANCE OF" WORK CQ\,'(R(Q BY WE CONIlttoCT. NN WORK WITHIN THE TRAVELED RlGtfT-OF"-WAY THAT w.y INTERRUPT NORIoIIoL TR.I.ITIC flOW SHALL REQUIRE ..... APPRCIVED fR,t,fF"1C CONTROl. Pt.AN 81' WE TRAfFlC ENGINEERINC OMSION Of WE OEPAATWENT OF" PUBUC WORKS. ..... l srC110HS Of THE WSO.O.T. STANDARO SPECIFlCATIQH'S 1-07.2l. TRAfFIC CONTROL SlW.J.. APPlY 15. SPECIAl OAAINAGE ILASURES WILL BE REOUIRrO If" WE PROJECT lOCATION IS WITHIN THE AQUifER PROTECTION AAfA Call before you O,g. 1.800·424·5555 --".., PERMIT DRAWINGS MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE 04441.00 STORM DRAINAGE NOTES II DETAILS ",,~. __ HORIZONTAL DATUM orr or RENTON. NAD 83/91 WASHINCTON COORDINATE SYSTEM. NORTH ZONE. BASED ON HORIZONTAL CONTROl POINTS 205 AND tSa7. POINT 205 BEING A NON IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF BURNETT AVE AND 2ND ST,; POINT 1687 B1NING A BRASS PLUG AT THE INTERSECnON Of RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND 'll[llS AVE. yEBTlCAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON. NAVD 88 BASED ON CITY VERTICAL CONTROl IoIARK NUIoIBER 1939 'WITH A PUBUSHED EL£VAnON Of 11.363 IoIETERS. 11.363 IoIETERS • 39.37/12-37.J45 FEET. ,.1-/ :en CQNITRucnON NOTEI' (J)'lllETTAP DCIS1'INO 24-[II Y.A.IN PfROTY" RDlTa.STAHDMDS.. .. STAU.'·T~1EE AM) ,. TAPPING CAfE VAL'£ Cb"LF ,-[II (nR£). QI FRE DO'AItlMEJrfT c::c:H£C1'ICI\I AND PlY WCU'4lEOOHIIUIlIDtoWALLSEIPt.lJII8IHO PlANS FOR CCNlECTDl ® -r 0CIt£SlIC WElER AND SERWX. ~ CClHNECT TO EldSlIHG r SNlTARY SOlER MNN PER aTY OF' RENTON STANDARDS. ... lEoa34.10(\lERf'Y). (I) 147 LF ,-PVC SlOE SEWER. S002.OS (%)GREASEINlERCEPTOIt CZD c:otGttCT TO IOTCHEN I'\.UM8INQ. e-1£-37.20 ~ '" PVC SE..:R S1U8. IE"SUs. ma..EANOUTP£R aTYOF'RENTtI\I STANDARDS. .. :. ,,~ [! / ";;: :;;-;-~-_~:';::,;," ;..,<~}t,~ ___ ..!'._ ~ /: __ --:-_-:- ' L.!~O I J "-,-) ~ \ ') • , ') ~I,-,Il \ •• JJ _ _ ' .' '" . ]""' '~7'-·""---,--",-: \ .', .' r':, " .. ': ' ,'i , .. 'WIL~IAMS AVE! S: . lJ:~bl~-.i~Ji;'--!l- ?:' ('Ii -. GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0'0 211 ",""-. ..- I III ruT) /;,O',i:;;:~ .!,.,,(J_:'~';. =>·rZI \:.~/ 1-, of '/'t I 'I 1-""'r'~"lL'" , " "/ 'I 'I " ,s! -, "'", -t, __ .;~~::,,_: b/\, [-L 'd'L .' '"',, ~-'~-.'" '''1 .. ,. ';;."':".:'. ~ ~ ~ , ..... ./1: £XIST IIlJ)G ~ \ ; I' /' , / I Ii: ~ Ii ii /,1 ~ I; i ~ <~. Ii --.. f; Call before you 019. : t,~~· CAunON: "' ... ,,~ ~ p_" "::~.~:~j:":. :,' .... :.:.;':: "!l.!..-- ,I,1! lHE CCl4lRACTCIR SMAlL IE R£SPOHSIIl..[ FtIIt '4JIIf'I'INO 1M[ LOCATION, DIIIIENSI(Ir(, ~ ,I:'i ~~~~U~~~T:~\o~~~Y: :"I~I PIIII(IITCCCNS1JIIUC1lOH. lHISSHAI.1.INCl.UXCAI..LlNGUlI.JTTlOCAn:. _- "il':·· V"Y" wvn.Y'" ny,,;; ,......... /' I ,,"".. i . : C,' 1-1OO-42 .... ~ Ate) no POlHaMO AU. rE 1H[ 0IIS1WQ UlIUlI£S AT LOCAnoNS ~:~:t ~=~~~!t~~~T. PERMIT DRAWINGS --::;'~I . k~ .""".... -I (J:ififl!) ~:;;::;;:.~ A .. =",.:··~;:.""", E" ..... ;;~;;:'1 FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT JUNe :<'004 I MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE .DI07 •• 1.00 i )-::; -I 'loO ~ ...... _..... • .. _ •• _" ••• _ ....... ,... P.o. BOx 1018 'U!'I O:~~SR~O"; , I .I ,. ,.,-, 111·'." '·000· ... -._ '''' ,_n, .H·"" ~[RCER ISL.AND WA 98040 SCAlE I ,!; If • _ • I!)AT" I ," 2C'-0' WATER & SANITARY SEWER PLAN 9fIT_~4.0 a . : (D dB' I !If !Ii ~ I~ 'I!UU !I 'a\ III H,,· ~ i ~ I' 'I '1I"ld, n n !IIIII ,1'1.: \. 1I'~"i'! ,1'11 j.' "'31~ " 'I j,lIl' • nl~111 1II'il, q !1'i',!1 II, ",Ii Ili~II' ~ i ~ I! 'I I I • R H~ pi i • ~ ~ I: ",m >ll Zll =n= "tJ >r-m ll", <> ::0 ",ll 3!: mO ,;!l1 -t !ll'" ~~ C .... ll ::0 mm > ",z .... :E "0 OZ mo Z .... m ?!z Ci) r-.... "'ll en m ~ i\ I~ : :. , ~~~ ~~ ~~" ~h ~!~ ~i ~II:~ m O~n ~i. ;e:~ ~~ ". 8~~ ~~ !le" ~§ .0 c. ~~ ~m 'v ~~~ a~ ". .' ~~~ Q. e~ ~~: ~. ~~ 6~~ ~~ i~ '.~ ~~ g~ ;~ ~~. i~ ·2 ~~g ~~ ~~ '~n ~~ " ·O~ I! ~~; n2 !l~ ~3 ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ;~~ ~ ~ 0 . I . ~~~ 'ni ~;~ .. ~ ; (D. :1 • 'I' i'~ i ~ .. ii~{un ~l. I .. ~ :.' f l'lar' :i~ 'II jJ I • • II!! In I u I I I I~: l~ I' i ! I ~~ . i" " ~ . can h ",!l ~~ ", ~~~ ~~ ~& ~. ~2g ~i ", ~~ ~n ~i!l ~~ nil !l. ~""'i £~ ~~ "~ ~~~ ~~ !~ ~~ E~~ ~~ !l~ ~g ;~~ ::;;~ ,~ a;\l ~!l ~~~ ~~ ~: ~~ H~ ., ~u "~ ~i ~~ .' ~~ ~~ ~~~ ,~ ~~. ~Q ~~ ~~; ~~ r .~ ~~~ i: ~. "8 n:;~ 5" ~a~ .; e~ ~,~ ~;ii m i~~ ~~ ", !l . ~~ "~ " ~;~~ ,q~i'~ .. "'''' ::;IF~i: "~~!l ~i~~ ~~~a ~~~~ '""0"'''' ~~~~ ~~~i i1~F~ ~~.~ I ~:;~ ~~h ~iH~ ~~;~ f'i J / KH ~. I ~ I~ ~~ i~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ i§ "~ ~~ ~i "c ~§ ~~ Q: ~~ ~i I~ I~ :;:;::~~~¥f~I~,*.,i':~;-;;~A~~:"l:;'., .. ",-:3"$'~' Jo, ••• ".,'-s,"~.·,,' '''''''', .... '",. , .. " .. , I ~ i • ~ I' I-8~ ~~~~r' . Ii: ° '"'0'" ~;:~1l2~oo m!~mm!ii ~~~~i ~'" 6'" ~~e~" ~"85'F ~;S~; ~~mu ~F ~. "O~gF .~"b~ ~. i~~~~ ~~i~~~ ~~~~; ~;fXg~g~~~~~2i "~~~o ~R ~il ~II\~~~; ~;<'iB~ ~H8 .~ il~: h ~ ~ (~~; ~ ~ :~~~~ ~i ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ .... !\l .. z ~ ~~ ~i~~~~ ~i~!~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~;;~Q>~.~~Ii;~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ ... ~~i~ >< "g" 8~.~' ~~ g:o.'Sa~ ~;~~~e ~~i::~F i~~l:~ .~.2'~~ Q~g~o" ~~~~; ~ ~z ~·l<~ ~ ~~i~~ ~"'~~x"!~aJ~~z; ~~ ~ d~~ii' ~q,~~~ ~:;;~~i;~~~Agi ~;~iF § ~~ . ~~~~ oo~~~~ ~~~~~ ~a ~H~ ~z~~~o ~x~~i~~F~~~~~i ~!:lx~i 0; 0' ~~~i~~ ~::ui> .. ~~U~i !~~i~ ~~ ~!:! m~ "Bii~o -:,.~ ~~z:"~~!1!2~;~g~ ~g ~i2~ ~i~=g~~Z~}~">'I!!! ~~~~o • " ,~ ~ ;~i~~~ ~~~~! q~~~.~ ,-~g'.~~.~~~.F ~~;~i a l~;i ~ Fj~ ~~~~ z.,gZ:;D mii ~~P"~ ~~~~~;;o;!!~~;~!I! ~ ~~;~ ~~Q§ "~~"> ~ :~~; i;~~ ~~~g~~ ~~;~~~!~h~m mi! ~ ~fflt ~~~ g~~r .0< F;~:i! ~~;!~~ "~~ ~.~ ~"." 22>~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Roo P!F :~:~ ;;:2';(; ~i~ i~~g ~i;~~ .a~~~:~ ~!ia~;;~::J;~~~ ~.!~~ ~". ~~~~ ~~:~ ~F~,",~:ij g~~ .z· ii~~ :~:i~ ."c =~~~?~ ~g~~;¥o~~£~~~! Y'colt iJ!~~ ~ .. ~ ~~!I~~~iQ~g~e~ ~:~~ H~ ~;~ .0.5 ~~~-~~~~~~ ~8"'''' ".~ "~"" ~~~ m" ~" Q'~ p~~ ~ Fio~ ~~~ , 0 ".~~ " .. ~~ ~~! ~! ~~~ F< ~ ~ ~~i ~ ~.:~ ~ ~~ :~~ ~o~ ~JII ~ 'i if ~t II if ¥{ . lei I . I' ~f i I! !' ! ~l i ~1 : 5ji'" !qj i~:~;; §~~ "" 2~~' F2i1" ~§~" ;::: ~~~p'p ~p~m ~~~3~ '~F ~§ ~~~~ ~~~F ~"'~~ =-~~i~. U!~F io-~~ i~b ~: ~S:og ~~Qi h~ ~ 8aB~l 0"::. ~IE ~>!~~ ~a~ i!l!~ F ~B!l~~ ~~~~8 ~~ ~~:Q <.~~ I!l g~gi' ~i~;! ~~~ ~~~~ Qi'",::1 ~~2 :i! Oo::~fl!.& ~~~'. ;~~ ". ~!~: .. ~ ~ g§~£i ~zF~~ CY'ci Ii~ 0:;~ !f~~f;l'" :;ilg~~ ~~!i ~~ :;:i ~". ~~;.~ ~.iI!~~ ot~ Q~"g : ~~i~2 ~~§i ~.~ AE ~~!~ :F~ ~ ~~§~~ ~~~~~ ~~" 2~'~ ~~" ~i ~;~§ a:~~ ~'~2a ~~~~ ~~j ~~~ ~ ~s~a~ ;.'§~ -~~.,;~ ~il:~ ~." m aO j;!£~ ~ ~Ft~g~ -~~~F ~~:; .~ ~j;!ilI:o. a@gl!l ~~~ ~ i~~~1 ~~~~~ '~F g~8 'i ~E~~ i~H i~~~ ~." 7~ ~:~~ " 2~·0 ril':o.~~ .s~ "< • hp ;~§~ ~~ ~ ~Ii!;;i !Zg f~~~ ~~~ EQ"~ ;na o~. f 8.~~ ~i~ ~m ~~ h~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~. ~ ." • ! ig~:i! :;!~~-( o~~ ~~!i§ bl~~ . ~ snfA~ i 21'" .~~ . ~h ~F ~; z· ",0 il!~~ ~;§~ .k~~~ fl~~~ ,0 < o"~ ~~~g ~ gF ~~ ~ , " ~ ~g ~~ ~ ~ < iI~ ~ .~ Q ~ ~ " " . iii '" 0 " ;c: ~"U >-ViP Z >m 0 zo m .ox < ~~ ~ ~ ~ o m Z ... ~~ ~~i i ~ ~ ~ ~ z 0 § ~ ;c: m " " :e F "D >Gl m ... > ::0 m" s:: "0 zm OZ -I ... '" m> "' ... C .. " ::0 om » m Z ...... :E >0 ;=Z Z "''' m G> Z ... en " m Jam Free Printing :W 2- Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960™ (-----------------------------_._-- I I 0007200008 Dean & Kerri Graham 18435 SE 133rd PI Renton, W A 98059 0007200014 Angelo Righi 1109 N 37th St Renton, WA 98056 0007200055 Michael Oharra 94 Williams Ave S Renton, W A 98055 0007200077 Richard & Betty Stauff 13813 139th Ave SE . Renton, WA 98059 0007200095 St Lukes Episcopal Church 99 Wells Ave S Renton, WA 98055 0007200111 Mkd Development Co Inc 10020A Main St #B 11 0 Bellevue, W A 98004 0007200147 Maxwell Ryan PO Box 336 Renton, W A 98057 0007200161 Jon & Linda Newman 8070 S Langston Rd Seattle, W A 98178 I fi"i7'\\ _ www.avery.com I \:!:.y -1-800-GO-AVERY I _______________________ _ 0007200012 Les Sherrill 42-117 Old Kalanianaole Rd Kailua, HI 96734 0007200073 Parkside At 95-burnett Llc 2256 38th PI E Seattle, W A 98112 0007200090 Gannon J K & L E 22925 SE 292nd PI Kent, W A 98042 0007200096 Storwick Russell PO Box 727 Anacortes, W A 98221 0007200118 Robert Cooper 87 Williams Ave S Renton, WA 98055 0007200130 Tennessee Group L L C 710 S 2nd St Renton, W A 98055 0007200140 Salvation Army· PO Box 9219 Seattle, W A 98109 0007200162 Greg Gannon PO Box 391 Hobart, W A 98025 AH3J\"-09-o08-~ WOJ',{JaAe'MMM -- \i\ AVERY® 5960™ 0007200013 Louis Caniparoli 84 Logan Ave S Renton, WA 98055 '\ I ---------------< 0007200053 James Johnson 4258 Sunset Dr Lake Oswego, OR 97035 0007200075 Starkovich Rudy J 810 N Riverside Dr Renton, WA 98055 0007200093 William & Mary Tomalin 10464 Forest Ave S Seattle, W A 98178 0007200122 Margaret Schmidt 7136 S Sunnycrest Rd Seattle, W A 98178 0007200138 Violet Meakin 7100 S Taft St Seattle, W A 98178 0007200145 Carlos & Shannon Bueno 913 Harrington Ave NE #6 Renton, W A 98056 0007200160 Frank & Darlene Brozovich 7547 S Laurel St Seattle, WA 98178 '-------_._----------._-./ N.l.0965 3.1V1dW3.1 ~aA'f/ asn 6u!~U!Jd aaJ:I wer Jam Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960™ 0007200168 Ren Four Inc PO Box 59 Renton, WA 98057 0007200213 Authority Housing PO Box 2316 Renton, W A 98056 5696000215 Hall Musicians 3541 Canterbury Ln Kent, W A 98032 5696000235 Mary Lou Sigette 116 Logan Ave S Renton, W A 98055 5696000255 Khanh & Hoa Lu 13414 SE 85th St . Renton, WA 98059 5696000275 Richard & Karen Kaercher PO Box 8 Hobart, W A 98025 7231501950 Thanh Nguyen California Ave SW #200 Seattle, W A 98116 7231501970 M & VEnts' 124 Williams Ave S Renton, W A 98055 7231502020 Kenneth King 350 Sunset Blvd N Renton, W A 98055 "---.. _-------_._----.. -- w~0965 ®AHaAY @ - 5696000200 www.avery.com 1-80o-GO-AVERY Washington Mutual Savgings Bank PO Box 7788 Newport Beach, CA 92658 5696000245 Thanh Nguyen & Melissa Lu 713 SW 353rd PI Federal Way, W A 98023 . 569600 0276 Donald Erue 14415 14th Ave SW Seattle, W A 98166 7231501979 U S Bank Corporate Props 2800 E Lake St Minneapolis, MN 55406 ------_ ... _-------- AH:lAV-09-008-1. WOJ',{JaAe'MMM -- \i\ AVeRY® 5960™ --'\ 5696000210 Washington Mutual Savings Bank PO Box 7788 Newport Beach, CA 92658 5696000225 Bryan & Jennifer Zug 117 Burnett PI S Renton, WA 98055 5696000250 212 Wells Llc 212 Wells Ave S #J Renton, W A 98055 7231501965 Richard Harper Jr. 116 Williams Ave S Renton, WA 98055 7231502085 Alex Cugini Jr. 611 Renton Ave S Renton, W A 98055 w~0965 UVldWU ~aAV asn 6u!~U!Jd aaJ::I wer Steve Johnston Cu rtis Beattie & Associates 3131 Elliott Avenue#270 Seattle, WA 98121 (contact) Violet Meekin 7100 S Taft Street Seattle, WA 98178 (party of record) Artice Slemko 14415 12th SW Seattle, WA 98166 (party of record) PARTIES OF' RECORD Merrill Gardens LUA04-070, ECF, SA-H Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, WA 98040 (applicant) James G. Johnson 4528 Sunset Drive Lake Oswego, OR 97035 (party of record) Robert Cooper 87 Williams Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 (party of record) Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. 710 S 2nd Street Renton, WA 98055 (owner) Jim Medzegian 11204 Rainier Ave S Seattle, WA 98178 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) HiU1!nll pt \ I i q II IlSi;~ I I' i H! I I 5111 I . ~ 2 , l I I r "lj't I~ r ~ ~ ~ : ~ f .'-F , ,-' I: Ii f ~ f , (I II I I I I " jf .~ P! I · ~ ~ 1111 r i H • I I · ~ , , I I I i I B ; • • I . •• __ J. --------.----_. ----------------,-Tt ~ . S. TOBIN ST. ) ] ] ] -1--:· ~!-H r ] JJJI7!!M" ""·"iIti/a. ·1~9IDD i CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5370 AN .:,ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED SOUTH OF SOUTH TOBIN STREET, BETWEEN BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH AND WILLIAMS AVENUE SOUTH, (FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT, L.L.c.; VAC-04-004). WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating an alley right-of-way ten feet wide and approximately 50 feet in length running north and south and approximately 115 feet in length running east and west, located south of South Tobin Street, between Burnett Avenue South and . Williams Avenue South, was filed with the City Clerk on August 5, 2004, and that petition was signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3719, passed on September 27,2004, set October 25, 2004, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2005, City Council adopted the recommendation of the Planning and Development Committee to accept compensation at $25,500 for the alley vacation 1 -' ORDINANCE NO. 5370 and accepted the 20-foot right-of-way dedication, appraised at $25,500, in lieu of the cash compensation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described alley right-of-way located south of South Tobin Street, between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South, to wit: (A portion of vacated right-of-way in the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington) See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein is hereby vacated. SECTION II. Compensation is set in the amount of $25,500 for this alley vacation and a 20-foot right-of-way dedication has been accepted in lieu of the cash compensation. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21 s t day of __ A:..:...p"-r_l..;:....:· 1=---___ , 2008. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 2 .. ORDINANCE NO. 5370 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 21 s t day Of __ =-A.I:<-p r"-,l,,,-,' 1"'--____ , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor A~ed as to form: . Ci-,~2W~ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney \. l •.. t-0"" .... " •.. ~,: ... , ---' ...... " L.J: « .'; (l:' : l. • ': . . ., ,. "" ~ u..1 : Date of Publication: 4/26/2008 (summary) 0·. ,,--... ' '.. v.J.," ~ .... ..' ./ ........ , .,- . i", • \.:.' ", • JI •• ~"t~.··,·"· ORD.1458:4/08/08:scr 3 ORDINANCE NO. 5370 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A strip of land lying within the Northeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M., being that portion of Lots 3 and 18, Block 24, Town of Renton, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Volume 1 of Plats, page 135, in King County, Washington, dedicated as alley under recording numbers 2117471, 2117484, 2117478 and 7811200482 and more particularly described as follows: The east 5 feet of Lot 3; EXCEPT the north 20 feet; The north 10 feet of the south 30 feet of Lot 3; And the west 5 feet of Lot 18'; EXCEPT the north 20 feet; , Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. " .J .f'" o . ",I") " IX) 01 • ",'" , 0 501 Z ORDINANCE NO. 5370 EXHIBIT MAP ALLEY VACATION PLAT OF THE TOWN OF RENTON RENTON, WASHINGTON M- : : I 'g I 0007200096 I-~ i l I ~! I ~ ~r::,4> ~~I:g ~--:g 1...------1- , 1:-:''' 0 I ~, ,,'Ii EXISTING 10' ALLEY, ~ ~ REC. NO. 7811200482 I f:! YO TO BE VACATED I I 2 NBB 23'k7"W 20 7231502130 19 7231502125 \.1 NB8'23'47"W 115.13'"'"·...;.;.-- N8S'23'47"W 115.00' 1---'--/-~N~O~1"£o.29.'20"E~O.~O~8' __ -r~u-~ __ +- 18 7231502120 ... ~ EXISTING 5' ALLEY, W I REC. NO. 2117471 Z . t: 4 &: 2117484; a: PORTION TO BE VACATED ;::) a:I '. _ _ 12Q.!,O' NB8"23' 4-"=7::-"W-- 17 - -w EXISTING 5' ALLEY, : g REC. NO~211747B; _ ~ TO BE VACATED 16 'b .f'" N NO;".. I "a> .-0 I f'I 0.' CI:! I ~i ~ I 120:.:..;.1..::.3_' _ _ _ I; 1-88'23'47"W ---1 P.\P04\04441.10\CAD\H41-[XHIBIT.dwg 10/2712004 02,56,5'5 PM PDT Engineering Planning Surveying SCALE: ,. = 50' Penha/Jegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc, 750 Sixth Street South PH: (425) 827-2014 Kirklond. WA 98033 1-800-945-8408 Sell tile www.paceengrs.com FAX: (425) 827"':5043 FILE: \4441-EXHIBIT.DWG Klrklllnd DATE: 02/15 06 RLH PROJ. NO.: 04441.10 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 BILL OF SALE Project File #: I Property Tax Parcel Number: I, Stre~tJrsection: 1 list-+ ..... I ~4 + 1..>: ';-, 1 Addre~ Jo"t ........ 4t1 /t.re.$ • Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on.page __ . Grant0t:(~: . ". Grantee(s): . 1. "~r(\ll G,QrclOxl~9~ e.tn;WV City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. ,LLC., The Gnntor, as named above, for, and in consideration of mutual benefits, hereby grants, bargains, sells and delivers to the Grantee, as named above, the following described personal property: WATER SYSTEM: t%gth Size eIRe L.F. of 1,''., ., Water Main la S-t. •• , W-3d-~' ~l.:. L.F.,of It~ .. .. ... Water Main loSO L.F.of 11.-" ., .. ., Water Main f~ ea~h of 8~ .. .. Gate Valves &.'1. each of "ta 11.~' .. Gate Valves ~ each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Size ~ 5-3b2-~ 1'1'1 L.F. of (. " ., Sv?y Sewer Main "" L.F. of ~I.t. .. 3c '1 't Sewer Main L.F.of .. Sewer Main I each of 'il( 8'1. G~" Diftffteta" MRBheJes t:;,,~~ ini<",«t each of .. Diameter Manholes each of .. Diameter Manholes STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size ~ D~3~ 18'2-L.F. of I?-'" .. 12:r. Storm Line 111 L.F.of 8 ~, .. /-\~s Storm Line ~\.l L.F.of Go <, .. rvt... Storm Line each of .. Storm Inlet/Outlet ~ each of 1(8" .. 2-Storm Catch Basin lo each of .:t -, ., , Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk. Asphalt Pavement) Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk 8~O L.F. Asphalt Pavement: '-tqe~ SY or L.F.of Width STREET LIGHTING: # of Poles ,P- By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs, execrord administrators and assigns forever. J,flo 7 -() Ot::') ?Ct. 1(1 . H:\FILE.SYS\FRM\84HNDOU1\BILLSALE.DOC\MAB Page 1 • Fonn 84 OOOllbh J I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. ~ . ~. 1'1/ '"Ldd6 A6t~ AM! M6'(i'tt.i.. G~'-' mtRtiAJ rOI\l C&! I\JrK.C .' LLC , INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASFiINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence 'that ______ '--_ --:-_-:--,.-.,..,---:-~~--:-::~-:--_-:---:--__ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary acHor the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary~~~· ______________________ _ My appointment expires: ___________ _ Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING) . Q/ ~ I certify thatI know or have satisfactory evidence that ...Jft'.lWfJ 'tYl .. . fVLo run fLn signed this instrument, on oath stated that helshe/they to execute the instrument and acknowledg 't the and ____ --,--__ or' .' to be the free and voluntary act of such partylparties for the uses arid purposes mentioned in the instrument CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STA TB OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of J 19--, before me personally appeared to me known to ~----------------~~-be of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that helshe was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Prin~ _____________ _ My appointment expires: ___________ _ Dated: Page 2 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 4th day of November, 2004, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below erititled application or petition. Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ~day of No VUrlhLv ' 2004. Application, Petition or Case No.: ~~ ~&and for the State of Washington Residing at ~ , therein. \ Merill Gardens Renton JVP, LLC LUA 04-070,SA-H, ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. )~ CITY OF RENTON Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor November 18, 2004 JamesV. Medzegian 11204 Rainier Ave. South Seattle, WA 98178 Re: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC LUA 04-070, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Medzegian: Hearing Examiner Fred J. Kaufman This office has received your letter regarding the above decision. You do not raise any issues pertaining to the current permit but the comments of one of the witnesses. The minutes that you quoted from are merely a witness's opinion of potential issues regarding the alley west of your property. They were not made by City staff. They do not necessarily reflect City regulations. When and if further development surrounding the alley is proposed, those development plans will be subject to City review. It would be speculation at this time to determine what improvements might or might not be needed to support that new development. In summary, the proposed development does not require any action on the part of neighboring property owners. If this office can provide any further assistance, please feel free to write. Sincerely, --II, \-\ ~\J~~ Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton FK/nt cc: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Warren, City Attorney Neil Watts, Development Services Jennifer Henning, Development Services Jason Jordan, Development Services Parties of Record ----1 0-5-5-S-ou-th-a-ra-dy-W-ay---R-e-n-to-n-, W-as-h-in-gt-o-n-9-80-5-5---(4-2-5-) 4-3-0--6-5-15----~ ~ Thic ...,,:>no .. rr.nt-::.;nc c;nO/A n::.r\lr!"",r! rn'=lfcri-:.I '1nOI. nnc-f .... nn<:"o ........ r.-... AHEAD OF THE CURVE To: Fred J. Kaufinan Hearing Examiner Cc: Jason Jordan Senior Planner Subject: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA 04-070, SA-H, ECF r~) 1, ® rn U Wi rn rn1 lJlJ Nov I 5 2u04 ~ November 10, 2004 Reference: Minutes of hearing (held on 10/19/04) dated November 4,2004, regarding subject project. The undersigned owns property at 79 and 81 Williams Ave. South which is east of and adjacent to the subject project. I am deeply concerned with a statement contained on page 4 in the reference Minutes. Under the paragraph starting with Steve Friedman stated-----"It was his understanding that future applications to the east will require those property owners to dedicate 5 feet of their property to add to the alley width." I need to know, as do other near-by property owners, whether we will in fact be required by the City of Renton to give up five feet of our property to accommodate the subject project to the west of us. This is a major issue for me. Your response to my concern is much appreciated. u, ames V. Medzegian 11204 Rainier Ave. South Seattle, W A 98178 (206) 772-1016 " .' t '\ CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 12TH day of October, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Hearing Examiner Report documents. This information was sent to: See Attached KA " .... ~C~~III J~~~~~~~~-=~~~ __________ ~~~~~~~.:,~~ .-(\ I, ~ STATE OF WAS ~ . ~ SS ~ COUNTY OF KING ) (J\"" PUB\_\V ./§ j l/-·· 6 O:1",,~-" "fJ-. •••• -29-••.• "oJ: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patrick Roduin II ••• ~ OF"W~Sy..~-... -- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volunta'rr~wl''ihe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: dWo'l Notary (Print }: ________ ~~~:J':.!-':f.tP.;:.;J~'f;:.YN:::mrn!{Ar.trMrr1Ct'IlHEi:r .. r-F~::_::::__==_-------------------- My appointment expires: :J:'/ .:,,:;:'0iivl,v]d'JI EXFI,::rs o-2D-D7 Merrill Gardens LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF ;,' PARTIES OF RECORD MERRILL GARDENS LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF Steve Johnston Cu rtis Beattie & Associates 3131 Elliott Avenue ste: #270 Seattle, WA 98121 tel: (206) 282-8512 (contact) Violet Meekin 7100 S Taft Street Seattle, WA 98178 tel: (206) 772-2474 (party of record) Artice Slemko 14415 12th SW Seattle, WA 98166 (party of record) Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, WA 98040 tel: (206) 232-8330 (applicant) James G. Johnson 4528 Sunset Drive Lake Oswego, OR 97035 tel: (503) 635-4091 (party of record) Robert Cooper 87 Williams Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 tel: 425-255-8098 (party of record) Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. 710 S 2nd Street Renton, WA 98055 tel: (435) 235-3555 (owner) Jim Medzegian 11204 Rainier Ave S Seattle, WA 98178 tel: 206-772-1016 (party of record) (Page 1 of 1) STA TE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Lily Nguyen, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on Monday, 9/27/04 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $114.50 at the rate of $15.50 per inch for the first publication and N/A per inch for eac. Lily Nguyen Legal Adve~ing Representative, King County Journal Subscribed and sworn to me this 27th day of September, 2004. 4.. ~ \\\\\\\11111//11// ':\\\\ .A EA III .. :-.." ..... \v' G;." /-Y. .:;::. r' ......... '~ 'l ~ ~~ ••• ~. S\on c.J(-··o. 1? ~ Tom A. Meagher .:::' /?," _~\'" .c/~,,\ ~ Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redm~, 'Y~~~&ft y '" \ ~ Ad Number: 847050 P.O. Number: : _0-: 2: :: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. ~ (.fl \. Pu \3 \..\\.1 .1 f? ~ ~,,>.. e. ~o'\ •• • 0 s-'l ",/-··.~A.Y 2 ....... ~ ~ 'l <: .......... :<-' ~ ///11 0 F W p.. CO \\\"V- 1//111/ 11/ 11II \ \\\\\ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE & PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF Location: 104 Burnett Avenue S. The applicant proposes develop- ment of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls in two lower levels of parking. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. The development, at its maximum height, is proposed to be approximately 62 feet above existing grade. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 11, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on October 19, 2004 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: September 27, 2004 Published in the King County Journal September 27, 2004. #847050 ~ ~ HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT ~ . . '-.. November 4,2004 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: PUBLIC HEARING: Steve Friedman C/O Friedman Development PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, W A 98040 Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware, Inc. 715 Lind Avenue SW Renton, W A 98055 Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA 04-070, SA-H, ECF 104 Burnett A venue South Approval for a new market rate senior housing retirement complex to include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls. Development Services Recommendation: Approve with no conditions The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 12, 2004. After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES Thefollowing minutes are a summary of the October 19,2004 hearing. The legal record is r:ecorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, October 19,2004, at 10: 1 0 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. , The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No.1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Drawing Al.1, Site Plan application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Drawing A3.1, Elevations Exhibit No.4: Drawings A2.1-2.3, Floor Plans Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF November 4, 2004 Page 2 Exhibit No.5: Drawing C4.0, Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit No.7: Neighborhood Map Exhibit No.9: Rendering of Actual Building Exhibit No.6: Drawings Ll.1-1.2, Landscape Plans Exhibit No.8: Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jason Jordan, Senior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The zoning for the subject site is Center Downtown as well as the Comprehensive Land Use designation. The existing site is currently used as parking and lumber storage area for the McLendon's Hardware Store. North of the subject site is commercial and multi-family residential zoned properties. East of the site is single family (zoned Center Downtown) properties. South of the site is the McLendon's store and west of the site is commercial properties. The applicant is proposing a ISS-unit senior housing retirement complex. The site is approximately 1.86 acres in size and located on the east side of Burnett Avenue South and south of South Tobin Street. The senior housing complex would include several common areas. The site is currently developed with three large open air storage buildings which are utilized by McLendon's for storage, a 5,580 square foot concrete building, and a 12,906 square foot existing building that is proposed to remain. The sheds and the 5,000 square foot building will be demolished as part of this proposal. The existing McLendon's building will remain on the site, there is a lot line that goes to the edge of the building. Merrill Gardens would be comprised with two levels of parking, one below grade and one at grade, with four stories of residential units above. There are 10 townhouse units at street level, a main building entrance, with a porte-cochere, lobby, kitchen/dining room facility and other common areas. The net density for the project is 83.3 dulac. Pedestrian and vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South. The parking areas would be accessed via a IS-foot wide public alley off of South Tobin Street. The applicant proposes to provide a 5-foot easement onto the western portion of the alleyway to provide a 20-foot drive. The applicant has also proposed to vacate a portion of the public alley that connects back to South Tobin Street and replace it with ingress/egress to the east via a new 20-foot easement to Williams Avenue South. Burnett Avenue South and South Tobin Street will be improved along the site's street frontage with curb, gutter, sidewalk, lighting and street trees. ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated for the project. There were 9 mitigation measures and no appeals were filed. The Comprehensive Plan is very supportive of this type of development in the downtown. The subject site is located in the "Downtown Core Area" and presently is exempt from most development standards of the DC zone; including parking requirements, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. The CD zone allows a maximum building height of95 feet. The average height of the proposed building is approximately 57.5 feet above the ground level. The maximum building height is 62 feet above existing grade. All heights meet the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. The project proposal was determined to meet or exceed the Design Guidelines as established by City code and the Design Guideline report was approved on September 21,2004 by the Development Services Division Director. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. I Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF November 4, 2004 Page 3 The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Report, that concluded that the site is generally underlain by alluvium, consisting of interbedded sands, silts and gravels derived from the erosion of the upriver glacial deposits. The proposed building could be supported at the site with a variety of different types of support systems. The proposed development is expected to increase property values in this area of the City. The pfC1ject is located in the central business district and is parking exempt. The applicant is voluntarily proposing to provide 101 parking stalls in structured parking located under the building and a nine stall surface lot parking area. Traffic, Fire and Park Mitigation Fees were imposed by the ERe. Water service and other utilities are available in Burnett Avenue South and would be extended as necessary to the building by the applicant as required by City code. Staff approves the project with no conditions. Steve Friedman, Friedman Development, PO Box 1018, Mercer Island, W A 98040-1018 stated that Merrill Gardens is a Seattle based company, it's a descendant of the R.D. Merrill Timber Company formed in Seattle in 1924. In 1993 Merrill Gardens spun as a subsidiary of the R.D. Merrill Company to develop senior housing, independent living with a smaller component of the assisted care on a national basis. Currently Merrill Gardens owns and operates 62 properties in 10 states. Merrill Gardens is consistent in providing a high quality, private pay and well located independent living property for seniors. They have applied for and should receive a board and care license. There could be as much as 20% of the residents that will receive some form of assisted care. There is a need for independent living, they are no longer moving back with their adult children due to the fact that most of the adult children are working. Regarding the parking, most residents do not own a vehicle and do not drive. The facility provides transportation for the residents to shopping, medical appointments, etc. Residents come in and pay one bill that includes all their utilities except phone. A strong urban streetscape on the Burnett side was fairly easy to achieve, there is more concern about the future of the properties across the alley on the eastside. Walls were closed up along the parking side so that the views across the alley are protected. At some future date there is likely to be a mass demolition ofthe single-family homes across the alley and a multi-family project could likely be built there. A greenscape has been created along the second floor and up terraces to protect the occupant's privacy. Curt Beattie, Architect, 3131 Elliott Avenue Building, Suite 270, Seattle, W A 98121 stated that he is the architect for the building. Introduced a rendering of the building and talked about materials. There are actually two separate buildings linked together by a wide corridor. The southern portion of the building is the cominon area, porte-cochere, the dining facility is at the very southwest corner which gives a more commercial appearance to the street. The northern half of the building is set back with townhouse units with landscaping and separate outside entrances and internal access to the dining facility and the rest of the common areas. There is a strong link between this facility and the Renton Senior Center located just across the river. Richard Storwick, PO Box 78327, Seattle, WA 98178 stated that he is the trustee for three of the adjoining properties, one the office warehouse property, immediately north is a duplex residential property and north of that is a single family property. They are in favor of the development and the enhancement that it will provide to the area. The concerns are in regard to the alleyway access to the two warehouses at 106 and 108 Burnett Avenue South. This access has always necessitated some. larger vehicles and/or trailers delivering materials to the rear ofthe building. His concern was whether the alleyway would be one way or two way. Jason Jordan stated that it is currently utilized as two-way, the alley is actually going to be widened by 5 feet which will help Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF November 4,2004 Page 4 the maneuverability. The Fire Department did voice the same concerns. The existing alleyway exited to Burnett, the new alleyway will exit to Williams and the parking area allows a wider turning area as well. The alley will become public access for everyone. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that the Fire Department will have final say on making sure the radius is there for their vehicles. That may also include whether to make this alleyway one-way. There will be no parking, it will be signed. So far everything is an improvement over what currently exists. Richard Storwick stated that the warehouse is actually set back from the alley, there is a 12-foot parking area between the west side of the warehouse and the alley. There is room without blocking the alley for trucks and parking. The Examiner inquired as to what was going to happen with the existing McLendon building? Steve Friedman stated the northern most one-third of the McLendon property is a separate building and that building is scheduled to remain. There is no application pending or anticipated at this time. In providing the new alley and vacating the existing alley on the property was to create the platform to build the building that is proposed today, but also to create a viable access out. The alley that was dedicated years ago is only 15 feet wide, the 20-feet of the new public easement allows the size of vehicle to come around that corner. It was his understanding that future applications to the east will require those property owners to dedicate 5 feet of their property to add to the alley width. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10: 16 am. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC, by Steve Friedman, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a senior housing complex. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 104 Burnett Avenue South. The site is located on the east side of Burnett. It is immediately north of the McLendon Hardware Store and inCludes portions of the McLendon's complex including its lumber sheds. The site is bounded by South Tobin Street on the nonh and a portion of the site is bounded by Williams Avenue South on the east. A north-south alley located between Burnett and Williams is located to the rear ofthe site. Another alley runs east-west through the south portion of the site. Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF November 4,2004 c Page 5 6. The subject site consists oftwo adjoining rectangular parcels. The larger rectangle along Burnett is approximately 580 feet wide (Burnett A venue Frontage) by 110 feet deep. The small~r rectangle is offset to the southeast and is approximately 150 feet wide (William Avenue Frontage) and approximately 110 feet deep. The subject site is approximately 1.86 acres or 81,175 square feet. 7. The appl icant has proposed that portions of both the east-west and north-south alleys be vacated to allow the project. The east-west alley currently runs through a portion of what appears to be the McLendon's parking lot and then to Williams. The City Council is reviewing a vacation. (Subsequent to the public hearing the Council approved the vacation with further procedures to follow). 8. The subject site was part of the original incorporation of the City in 1901 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Center Downtown uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The subject site is zoned GO (Center Downtown) a zoning designation applied to the subject site in June 1993. 11. The CD zone permits a variety of urban uses including commercial, retail and residential uses in a dense pattern. 12. The applicant proposes developing what is termed a "market rate" senior housing retirement complex. The complex would contain 155 residential units in 4 floors. The residential mix will include 145 apartment units and 10 townhouse units. There will be 101 parking stalls including 92 in a two level garage and 9 surface parking stalls. The new building's footprint would be approximately 47,985 square feet. The complex will contain 193,960 square feet overall. 13. A 12,906 square foot commercial building, the building currently housing McLendon Hardware, WIll remain along the southern edge of the property. 14. The proposal consists of two main buildings connected by a hallway allowing internal circulation between buildings and allowing residents to reach common areas of the buildings. 15. The complex will be five levels. Parking would be located on an underground level and the first floor. In addition to the first floor parking, there would be 10 townhomes that would be located along the north Burnett facade, and a lobby, kitchen, dining area and other common areas. 16. There would be four floors of residential units. On levels two and five would be open gardens or terraces of approximately 5,560 square feet and 2,715 square feet respectively. Additional garden or landscaping areas would be located adjacent to the townhomes and along the Burnett and Tobin Streets. Street trees will also be planted along those roads. A surface parking lot located along Williams would also receive landscape treatment facing Burnett and Williams. 17. The buildings would be 62 feet tall at roof peak but will step down in height near Tobin Street and the roofline will vary downward in height around courtyard, bay and access points. 18. The south building will be have a drive up entrance, a porte-cochere, or covered circular driveway. This will permit vehicles to temporarily park to pickUp or drop off residents or visitors. Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF November 4,2004 Page 6 19. The ERC set the number of parking stalls required for this use at 101 and required the outdoor complement of nine stalls. The surface stalls are located east of the complex along Williams Avenue. At the moment there is no reason to change that number or the location of the stalls. It was suggested that they could be potentially relocated to another location but, again, that is not currently proposed. 20. As noted, the parking garage will be two levels. Doors to the garage are accessed from the alley located east of the subject site. One door would be located at the north end of the site close to Tobin while the second access point would be located toward the south but north of the current east-west alley. The eastern alley is 15 feet wide and does not meet Fire Department access standards. The applicant has proposed creating an easement along its eastern property line that could serve to enlarge the alley to 20 feet to provide both for normal and emergency access. 21. The building will contain a terrace along the perimeter ofthe second floor which will provide a step in the facade away from the street. Another terrace will be located on the fifth floor. In addition, the covered entry and a number of surface modulations will provide visual relief at approximately 40-foot intervals along Burnett. The project will also employ a combination of rooflines including hipped roof, cornices and the stepped north building line. These devices will provide additional visual relief. 22. While the building at 62 feet will be shorter than the permitted 95 feet permitted in the CD zone, it will comply with the limits dictated by the nearby airport. It will be 101.5 feet above sea level whereas 179 feet would be permitted. 23. The project is located in the Downtown Core where exemptions are in place to parking, setback and lot coverage, so compliance with many of the normal CD Zone standards is not required. The proposal is required to have a maximum street setback of 15 feet for a 25-foot tall building (or less). The purpose of the maximum setback is to provide an urban streetscape with buildings close to the sidewalk. The applicant proposes varying setbacks from seven (7) feet along Tobin to thirteen (13) feet along Burnett. These setback areas will contain landscaping including ground covers, shrubs and trees. The applicant also proposes street trees along both Burnett and Tobin. 24. The CD Zone permits a density of between 25 and 100 dwelling units per acre. The ISS-unit complex on 1.86 acres will have a density of 83.3 dwelling units per acre. 25. The owner of property located along Williams north and east of the intersection of the two alleys was concerned about possible conflicts with trucks making deliveries to his properties. It was noted that the effective alley width west of his site would be widened to 20 feet with an easement from the subject site and a similar easement would allow access through the surface parking lot proposed by the applicant along Williams. 26. The subject site is also governed by the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations since it is a multifamily development located in the CD Zone. The project was reviewed under those guidelines and was approved by the Development Services Division Administrator on September 21, 2004. CONCLUSIONS: I. The CD Zoning requires that the proposed residential complex receive Site Plan review. 2. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: J Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF November 4,2004 Page 7 a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate I ight and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 3. The CD designation found in the Comprehensive Plan suggests redevelopment of the downtown core with more high quality projects on a more urban, that is more dense, scale. It also calls for a density in the range of 25 to 100 dwelling units per acre which the 83.3 dwelling units per acre that the proposal will generate meets. The plan also calls for residential uses that generate additional retail services so that residential and retail uses complement one another. It would be hoped that market rate senior housing would help in this area. It does provide a new diversity although there are already a number of senior housing projects in the downtown area. 4. The complex is exempt from a number of requirements but appears to meet the Zoning Code requirements that are applicable to the project in addition to providing parking not otherwise required in the downtown area. The project will provide setbacks that result in the complex being closer to the sidewalk and street befitting its urban location and comply with the code that does require buildings to be set back not more than 15 feet. In addition, the project underwent separate urban design review. 5. The five-story complex will change the character of the area more so than the existing low-rise buildings currently occupying the site. The applicant will effectively widen the alley by five feet providing a bit more separation on the east. The building will also step down in height along its north aspect to blend better with the housing types along Tobin. In addition, the second and fifth floor terraces and other landscaping elements will soften the visual impact of the complex on the neighborhood. Similarly, the varied and modulating roofline and facade elements will reduce the apparent bulk of the building. Clearly, the alley will probably carry more traffic but, at least, it will be accommodated by a wider driving lane. ' 6. The project is without question urban in scale in terms of overall bulk, height and density. Landscaping along the perimeter of the complex, street trees and garden terraces within the complex are intended to lessen the impacts. Again, architectural details including modulations in the facade and rooflines are also intended to reduce the visual impacts of the building'S true size. 7. The development should not adversely affect property values. It appears to be a very well designed complex that will hopefully be rendered as well as it is designed. Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF November 4, 2004 Page 8 8. The circular drive, parking garage access and the changes to the intersecting alleys will help control and direct traffic. It would appear that necessary vehicular and pedestrian needs were addressed. 9. As noted above, the taller complex will change shadow impacts on some surrounding uses and the open space created by the surface parking lot and sheds will be lost to a large building. The articulated facade and internal terraces should help offset these impacts and provide sufficient light and air to the complex and surrounding properties. 10. Construction noises and dust are expected of any new construction but those will end when the complex is completed. The change from parking and retail to residential will change the character of the property but those changes will probably lessen the impacts of noise. II. The site is served by the City for domestic water and sanitary sewer service. There should be no issues relating to providing these and other urban services to the future residents. DECISION: The Site Plan is approved subject to the following condition: I. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC ORDERED THIS 4th day of November, 2004. TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of November, 2004 to the parties of record: Jason Jordan 1055 S Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Steve Friedman Friedman Development PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, WA 98055 Curt Beattie 3131 Elliott Avenue Building, Ste. 270 Seattle, WA 98121 Richard Storwick PO Box 78327 Seattle, WA 98178 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of November, 2004 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Stan Engler, Fire Kayren Kittrick Development Services Div. Renton, W A 98056 Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Larry Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC File No.: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF November 4,2004 Page 9 Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section I OOGofthe City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 18,2004. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision ofthe Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date ofthe Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies ofthis ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 18, 2004. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Councilor final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor . '.' October 12, 2004 . Steve Johnstol'J Curtis Beattie' & Associates . 3131ElliottAVenue' '#270 Seattle, WA98121 . SUBJECT: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre LUA04-070· SA-H ECF .... . . .,. . . ,. ,.., I "," Dear Mr. Johnston CIT_F ... ·RENTQN PlannitigIBuildiDglPublic Works Department Gregg ZimmermanP.E., Administrator '" ' . . This Jetter is to inform You.thatthe·appealperiod has ended for the Ehvironmental ReView Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non~S.ignifieance .. Miti~'~~e~f9rthe a~bVe~Jt3ferenCed proj~ct. . .. • , .•••. tJ :"":.-'· No appeals Were Wedon the ERG deterrnir1~tibn: ,'." .".": ,-.>c· " This decision is final. and application for. theajJpropri~telyrequiredpermits mayprooeed. The applicant· . must comply with all E;RC Mitigation' Measures.: Aj~earingExamiher Pu~lic Hearing has been scheduled for October 19,' 2004; where Site'pl~nGo'nditions may, be issued.. . .... . .' .. , -,",. ,", ':. If you'haveany questions,.pleasef~el,fteeio contact me.at,(425j4~oh27o. ' " cc: . Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardw~re Inc. / Owners Merrill Gardens Henton JVPLLC I Applicant . .... Violet Meekin,James G.Johnsor1,Jim Medzegian,Artice Slemko, Robert Cooper / Partiesof R~~ .,' . y ........... ~ ... ~----------1~05-5-S~o~ut-h-G-m~d~y-W-ay---R~e-n-to-n,-W-a-sh-i-ng-to-n~98~O-55~' ~~--~---~ . * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE/CURVE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIG.NIFICANCE.-MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF; AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION , PROJECT NAME: Merrill Gardena at Renton Centre PROJECT NUMBER: LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue S DESCRIPTION: The applicant 18 requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review end Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for tho construction of,. new merket rete 8enlor housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. Tho four-.tory building ,. proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet end will Include 155 residential units with 82 under structure parking atall8. The structure 18 planned to contain two lowar lovela 01 parking. The lowIst lavel of parkIng will ba approximately 6 feet below grada, while the second level of parking will comprise the aBstern half 01 the first floor (at grade) of the building. Four relldentlallevels are proposed to be located above the parking level •• The development, at It maximum height, Is proposed to be approximately 62 teet above existing grade. The proposal alIa Includel street trontage Improvements, on-slta landscaping, and the development of a 9-stall temporary parking lot, which would be located e8st of the proposed building. Accels to tho lito Is proposed from Burnett Avenue South, which Includes a porto'cochere In front of the main ontrance for vehicular drop.offsJplck-upa and pedestrians. However, acce .. to the vehicular parking under the building and the nine stall surface level parking Is proposed from the 15-foot wide public alley way located east ot the site trom South Tobin Street. The proJect Includes the demolition of three large open air shads, totaling approximately 9,650 square feet and a 5,580 square foot concrete building, In addition to the lurface parking area all utilized by the former McLendon', Hardware store. Construction Improvements Bre anticipated to begin In early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end at the same year. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must bo flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 11, 2004. Appeals must be flied In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clork'. Olllee, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 19, 2004 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PI.~a.sii Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION ""'''''''''''''' ........... ~ \LYN ""I ---",~ ........ ~A}tt .: ~· •• ~~"",\SS/O·':""" I, .:' •• '0'1" \1f ...... ~', : :' (j N01"4 ~" t'f\ ~ : C/) : ~J-. -~ "T\ ~ '.of: -0'-, ~:,,~ ,~."(t", (1,)' '" ~ ~ ~. Vl./e ...; I, ~ "'<S!~ ...: .3 "" O .. (:··:~·07 .... ~~; I Jf\~rek.. Jo~n ' hereby' certify that copies of ~f1.--<1s·HitiG~ .... -"''''' , ~--~ -1 0 nearHh\\\\" ........ above document were posted by me in . conspICUOUS p aces on r J the described property on.$if+. .1.1( ~0'1 Signed~~~ ATTEST: Subscribed and swolJlJ>efore me, a Notary Public, in and for ~ ~. Washington residing ~ , on the ?* day of ~ I ,;111 MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 .~. Agencies See Attached Steve Johnston Contact Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC Owner Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Owner Violet Meekin Party of Record James Johnson Party of Record Jim Medzegian Party of Record Artice Slemko Party of Record ~ ./'f .• AI J~ ~ . ./' """",\\\ (Signature of Sender): ~ __ ~\..'lN 1(..q~'1111 ./ :-_~v-:.·:,\ssiofli···P..c-\ .. ~.'~\;<' ~.'~ I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ! /8 t-\OT,t\L'> i·. ~\ ) ss :: '7), m: ~ ~: ... ~ 0' ~ COUNTY OF KING ) ~ '1 \ '¢USLIC f ; I, "Y~'" .... ~ ; I, ~ ··6"<9 07 • 0 ...... I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker I,. 0 ...... : ........ 0.'\ .: signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act ~br,Th~~~~13d purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,\\""'''' Dated: 0e;t I ~"I Notary biic in and for the sat Washington Notary (print): _____ -MMA¥1RIPI't:~VNMKAMC'ft#III'I'1:H:9IlEfFIIm"'I"''l'I''i!l!';;:;_-------- My appointment expires: MYAPPOlfllTMEfIll EXPIRES 6029-07 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology" Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region" Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor" Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt --AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology " 3190 160th Ave SE Attn. SEPA Reviewer Bellevue, WA 98008 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program 4717 W Marginal Way SW " Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation" Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 , City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. " Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing From: To: Date: Subject: Stacy Tucker Thompson, Nancy 10/5/2004 9:43:43 AM Party of Record Could you please add the following party of record to the Merrill Gardens File which is scheduled to be heard on October 19th? I received a late request to be added as a party of record in the mail yesterday. Party of Record: Robert Cooper 87 Williams Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 425-255-8098 Thank you! Stacy M. Tucker Secretary Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton (425) 430-7282 cc: Jordan, Jason · . ENVIRONME,NTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MiEETING NOTICE September 21, 20Q4 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning ':'rilleeting Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 l1ime: 9:00AM LocatiO'n: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Merrill Gardens at Renton Center (Jordan) LUA04-070, ECF, SA-H The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new 155-unit senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. Specifically, vehicular and pedestrian access is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South to the main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels is proposed from a 15-foot wide alley located east of the building. The applicant is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site in an adjoining lot. Project construction is planned to commence in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. Rainier Ave. Mixed Use -South Parking Lot (Fiala) LUA04-093, ECF, SA-A The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan review for the construction of 27 parking spaces within a surface lot associated with Chang's Mongolian Grill. The proposal includes portions of two large parcels containing Category 2 and 3 wetlands. The Category 3 wetland would be filled in to accommodate the parking lot with wetland compensation proposed off-site and include wetland creation, enhancement and buffer averaging. The proposal also involves the removal of noxious weeds; piping of an existing drainage ditch; installing a retaining wall; utility improvements; and a parking modification. Cingular Micro-Antennas -HE 1st Street (Fiala) LUA04-095, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 3-sector antenna array with 2 antennas per sector (micro-facility) flush mounted to a de-energized Puget Sound Energy lattice tower located on a utility tract within the Liberty Ridge subdivision. The site is zoned Residential-10 (R-10) dulac. Associated equipment would be located behind a solid 6-ft. cedar fence with a landscaped buffer. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® PUBLIC HEARING City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: Project Name: Applicant! Address: Owner/ Address: File Number: Project Description: Project Location: October 19, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC Attn: Steve Friedman C/O Friedman Development PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, W A 98040 Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. 715 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Planner: Jason E. Jordan The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls. The structure is planned to contain two lower levels of parking. The lowest level of parking will be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise half of the first floor (above grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. The project includes the demolition of three large open air sheds, totaling approximately 9,650 square feet and a 5,580 square foot concrete building. However an existing 12,906 square foot concrete building, which is located in the southeastern corner of the site, is proposed to remain. 104 Burnett Avenue South PUBLIC HEARING City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: Project Name: Applicant! Address: Owner/ Address: File Number: Project Description: Project Location: October 19, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC Attn: Steve Friedman C/O Friedman Development PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, W A 98040 Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. 715 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Planner: Jason E. Jordan The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls. The structure is planned to contain two lower levels of parking. The lowest level of parking will be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise half of the first floor (above grade) of the building; Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. The project includes the demolition of three large open air sheds, totaling approximately 9,650 square feet and a 5,580 square foot concrete building. However an existing 12,906 square foot concrete building, which is located in the southeastern corner of the site, is proposed to remain. 104 Burnett Avenue South City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19, 2004 Page20f2 B. EXHIBITS The following exhibits are entered into the record: Exhibit No.1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit NO.2: Drawing A 1.1, Site Plan (Received June 23, 2004). Exhibit No.3: Drawing A3.1, Elevations (Received June 23,2004). Exhibit NO.4: Drawings A.2.1 -2.3, Floor Plans (Received June 23, 2004). Exhibit NO.5: Drawing C4.0, Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan (Received June 23,2004). Exhibit NO.6: Drawings L 1.1 -1.2, Landscape Plans (Received June 23, 2004). Exhibit NO.7: Neighborhood Map (Received June 23, 2004). Exhibit No. 11: Zoning Map F3-E (Dated December, 2003). c. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. 2. 3. 4. Owner of Record: Zoning Designation: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Existing Site Use: 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North: East: South: West: 6. Access: 7. Site Area: 8. Project Data: Existing Building Area: New Building Area: Total Building Area: HEXRPT.doc Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. 715 Lind Avenue SW Renton, W A 98055 Center Downtown (CD) Center Downtown (CD) The site is currently utilized as the parking area and lumber storage area for the McLendon's Hardware store. Single-family and Multi-family zoned Residential Multi-Family -Urban (RM-U) Single-family zoned Center Downtown (CD) McLendon Hardware Store zoned Center Downtown (CD) A vacant site formerly utilized as the Lande Feed store zoned Center Downtown (CD) Burnett Avenue South, South Tobin Street and a 15-foot wide public alley 81, 175-sf (1.86 acres) area 12,906-sf (to remain) 193,960-sf 206,866-sf comments N/A N/A N/A City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19. 2004 Page 3 of 3 D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Zoning Comprehensive Plan Original City of Renton Plat N/A N/A N/A Ordinance No. 4404 4498 N/A Date 06/07/93 02/20/95 1901 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (RMC TITLE IV): 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-120.B: Commercial Development Standards 2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-100: Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations 3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations -General Section 4-4-070: Landscaping Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-090: Refuse and Recyclables Standards 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-200: Site Plan Review 6. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Environmental Element 3. Downtown Element 4. Economic Development 5. Housing Element G. DEPARTMENT ANAL YSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing a four-story, 155-unit senior housing apartment complex on a 1.86-acre site located on the east side of Burnett Avenue South and south of South Tobin Street. The senior housing complex also includes several common areas including a 3,236 square foot library/media room on the first floor, a 1,200 square foot activity room, a 5,560 square foot garden terrace on the second floor and a 2,715 square foot garden terrace on the fifth level. All of the common areas would be open and accessible to all residents. The courtyard areas would utilize landscape planters and trellises to create a separation between private outdoor areas of the first level units and the common courtyards. In addition, there are a number of other smaller linear landscaped areas along the perimeter of the building and around the porte-cochere, which also contains small landscaped features. The site is currently developed with three large open-air storage shed buildings, a 5,580 square foot concrete building, a 12,906 square foot building, and parking for the McLendon Hardware store. All existing structures will be removed during project development, with the exception of the 12,906 HEXRPT.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19, 2004 Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Page 4 of4 square foot concrete building that is located east of the proposed building and south of the proposed nine-stall surface parking area. Merrill Gardens would be comprised of two levels of parking at or below existing grade, with four levels of residential units above. The second level of parking, at street level, will also include 10 townhouse units, a main building entrance, with a porte-cochere, lobby, kitchen/dining room facility, and other common areas. The building will be approximately 62-feet in height at the peak of the roof. The property is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The density for the project is approximately 83.3 dwelling units/acre. Both pedestrian and vehicular access is via Burnett Avenue South via a porte-cochere (central looped driveway to the main building entrance/lobby). The 10-townhouse units on the ground floor will also have pedestrian access from Burnett Avenue South. The parking levels would be accessed via a 15-foot wide public alley off of Tobin Street South. The applicant has also proposed a nine-stall temporary parking area east of the building, which would also be accessed from the 15-foot wide public alley. The applicant has proposed to provide a five-foot easement onto the western portion of the alleyway in order to provide a minimum of a 20-foot wide drive aisle for vehicles entering and exiting via the alley. In addition, the applicant has proposed to vacate a portion of the public alley that connects back to South Tobin Street and replace it with ingress/egress to the east, via a new 20-foot easement to Williams Avenue South. A total of 92 internal parking stalls, along with nine surface levels stalls (total 101 stalls) are proposed. The project includes a 5,560 square foot garden terrace on the second floor and a 2,715 square foot garden terrace on the fifth level. The courtyard areas would utilize landscape planters and trellises to create a separation between private outdoor areas of the first level units and the common courtyards. The .project includes a combination of groundcover, shrubs, and trees along Burnett Avenue South and South Tobin Street. In addition, the applicant is proposing to provide a combination of shrubs and trees along the eastern and western edge of the nine-stall surface parking area. Burnett Avenue South and South Tobin Street will be improved along the site's street frontage with curb, gutter, sidewalk, lighting and street trees. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on September 21, 2004 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance, Mitigated for the project. The DNS-M included 9 mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on September 27,2004 and ended on October 11,2004. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. ERG MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposed project, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated: 1. The finished ground at the site shall be graded such that surface water is directed away from the building structure. Water shall not be allowed to stand in areas where footings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 2. Footing drains shall be installed around the perimeter foundation. The drains shall consist of a four-inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drainpipe laid at or near the bottom of the footings or grade beams with a gradient sufficient to generate flow. The drain lines shall be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining rock or free-draining granular material. The drain rock and drain line should be surrounded by a geotextile filter fabric. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. Roof drains shall be separately tightlined to discharge into the storm water collection system and shall not be connected to the footing drain system. Cleanouts shall be installed to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drains and roof downspout tightline systems. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. HEXRPT.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19, 2004 PageS of 5 4. The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures subject to the 2001 Department of Ecology's Erosion Control Manual. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 5. The applicant shall conduct and complete an archaeological assessment for the project area prior to building permit issuance. The archaeological assessment, including conclusions and recommendations, shall be forwarded to the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) and the affected Tribes for comment. If archaeological resources are identified during the assessment and cannot be avoided, mitigation measures will be developed and commenced in consultation with the City, OAHP, and the affected Tribes, in conformance with RCW 27.53, RCW 27.44 and WAC 25-48, prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per new multi-family unit and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. The applicant shall be required to keep the nine proposed surface level parking stalls unless a reduction in parking is approved by the City's Development Services Division. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new unit prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA As per RMC 4-9-200.E, "The Reviewing Official shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following": (A) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES HEXRPT.doc The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the project property is Center Downtown (CD). The intent of the "Center" deSignation is to create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton and to reinforce downtown Renton as the regional commercial district in the City. (Objectives DT-A and DT-B) The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: Policy DT-1. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and residential, which generate the demand for goods and services. Merrill Gardens is proposed as a multi-family residential senior housing complex/apartments. Future occupants will generate a demand for goods and services lending to the redevelopment of the Downtown Core. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. Policy DT-24. Net residential development densities in the downtown area should achieve a range of 25-1 00 dwelling units per acre. City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19, 2004 Page 60f6 The project's 155 dwelling units achieves a net density of 83.3 dwelling units per acre, which will help the City meet its obligation under the growth targets mandated by the Growth Management Act (GMA) for the downtown core area. Policy DT-S. Redevelopment of the downtown area should be encouraged to maintain and revitalize the downtown core. The proposed use will provide a more intensive use of an underdeveloped site and create housing opportunities. Policy LU-1S. Encourage a city-wide mix of housing types including large lot and small lot single- family development, small-scale and large-scale multi-family housing, and residential mixed-use development. Policy LU-17. Larger multi-family development projects are encouraged in the downtown area, the Center Office Residential and the Multi-family Residential-Infill designations. Policy H-7. Promote high quality residential living environments in all types of neighborhoods. Policy H-B. Encourage distribution of diverse housing types and unit sizes throughout the city. The project provides for a large scale (155 unit) senior housing multi-family mix in residential units and is located in the Downtown Core, which would provide for high quality residential environments for seniors throughout the community. Policy ED-3. Lands with adequate existing infrastructure should be given priority for development. The subject site has adequate infrastructure in place and has been an area of redevelopment focus for the City. Policy EN-1. Prevent development on lands where development would create hazards to life, property or environmental quality. The subject site does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas and when developed, would not create any adverse environmental impacts. Policy LU-112. Minimize the percentage of land devoted to surface parking by encouraging shared parking and development of parking structures The project provides 92 structured parking stalls, while limiting the amount of surface parking to nine stalls. (8) CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE REGULATIONS HEXRPT.doc The subject site is zoned Center Downtown (CD). The CD zone is established to provide for a wide variety of uses including commercial, residential, entertainment and personal/professional services. The CD zone allows multi-family retirement residential uses as primary permitted uses at densities ranging between 25 and 100 dwelling units per net acre. The proposed project includes 155 multi-family dwelling units on an 81,175 square foot site (1.86 acres), calculating to a net density of 83.3 dwelling units per net acre. It should also be noted that the proposed development promotes the goals and policies of the City's Economic Development priorities for the City's Downtown area. Development Standards The subject site is located in the "Downtown Core Area." Projects within the Downtown Core Area are presently exempt from most development standards of the CD zone; including parking requirements, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. Lot Coverage -The footprint for the building will cover the majority of the site. Specifically, the main level building footprint is proposed to be 47,985 square feet, plus the existing 12,906 square foot commercial building that is proposed to remain, which totals 60,981 square feet. This City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19, 2004 Page 7 of 7 HEXRPT.doc generates a total building coverage of 75% (47,985 + 12,906 building(s) footprint / 81,175 total site square feet = 75%). Setbacks I Landscaping -No minimum setbacks 'or landscape requirements are applied to CD zoned properties in the Downtown Core Area. However, the development standards stipulate a maximum setback area from a public street of 15 feet for buildings 25 feet in height or less. In this case, the applicant is proposing a seven-foot setback from South Tobin Street and a varied setback, not exceeding 13 feet from Burnett Avenue South. Both setback areas include large quantities of groundcovers, shrubs and trees, along with six individually landscaped courtyard areas containing a smaller variety of shade trees and ample groundcover, which would effectively transition the street to the building's fayade. The proposal also includes a perimeter deck on the second floor and a fifth floor terrace. The porte-cochere (looped entrance) is also proposed to be landscaped with groundcover, shrubs and ornamental fencing, which would lead to the lobby doors. The applicant has proposed to plant approximately 19 street trees, consisting of Red Sunset Maples and Katsura trees along Burnett Avenue South and South Tobin Street. The proponents have proposed surface modulations, with the projecting townhouse style units in the front of the building along with the modulated roofline to break up the visual appearance of the facades along Burnett Avenue South and South Tobin Street. Landscaping is Rroposed to soften and provide additional articulation to the expanse of the building facade. the applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan that enhances the visual character of the building. A variety of types of textured CMU will be used on the street front elevations. Walls along Burnett Avenue South are broken up with openings, which contain decorative screen material. In addition the porte-cochere near the center of the project softens the length of the building. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40 feet on the street sides on the Burnett Avenue South facade. Height -The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The average height of the proposed building at the parapets is approximately 57.5 feet above the ground level. The maximum building height is 62 feet above existing grade. The highest building elevation would be approximately 101.5 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. The applicant has provided a varied and creative roofline with a combination of hipped roofs, prominent cornices and a stepped roof plane at the north end of the building. The roof plan creates the appearance that the project is a city block made up of several different buildings. In addition, forms of hip roof of various sizes break up the sloped portions of the roof, which create an aesthetically pleasing building-scape. Further, the applicant has stepped the building down as it approached the northern property boundary in order to better match the existing single-family neighborhoods located near that property boundary. Parking, Loading, and Driveway Regulations -There are no parking requirements in the Downtown Core Area. The proposal includes a parking garage that provides 92 parking stalls along with a nine stall surface level parking area (total of 101 stalls) dedicated to the 155 residential units. If the project were located outside the Downtown Core Area, a minimum of 155 parking stalls would have been required. Nevertheless, as a condition of the City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 101 parking stalls, regardless of any future expansion plans. The parking garage and surface parking area is proposed to be accessed from a 20-foot wide easement (15-foot alley plus a five-foot easement) from South Tobin Street. The conceptual parking plan conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls. Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations All attached residential (multi-family) development and commercial/residential mixed use development in the Center Downtown (CD) zone requires design review according to the minimum standards and guidelines listed in the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. Staff analysis and recommended conditions are provided in a separate report and the decision to City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-010, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19, 2004 PageBofB approve is made by the Development Services Director. The project proposal was determined to meet or exceed the Design Guidelines as established by City code. As a result the Design Guideline report was approved on September 21, 2004 by the Development Services Division Director. (C) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USE The subject site is located in the center of downtown Renton and is surrounded by commercially zoned and high-density residential uses. The proposed senior retirement multi-family residential use is not expected to adversely impact surrounding properties. In fact, the senior retirement residential use is clearly supported by Comprehensive Plan policies and envisioned for the revitalization of downtown Renton. Staff anticipates the project to add value to the site and enhance the residential opportunities in the downtown area. In addition, the applicant has designed the building to gradually transition from the street to the building facade. The proposed building utilizes a variety of modulation and articulation. At the street level the building is generally setback 6 to 13 feet from the property line with step backs of 2 feet at intervals no longer than 40 feet. In addition, the applicant uses a variety of types of textured CMU will be used on the street front elevations. Walls along Burnett Avenue South are broken up with openings, which contain decorative screen material. In addition the porte-cochere near the center of the project softens the length of the building. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40 feet on the street sides on the Burnett Avenue South facade. As a result, this lessons the impact of a new four-story structure. The applicant has also designed the building to step down to two levels above the parking structure near the northern property boundary to be more to scale with the surrounding single-family neighborhood. Construction activities would result in some noise, dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, which is estimated to be have a total duration of approximately 18' months (January 2005 to August 2006). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. Potential short-term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project. Existing code provisions that limit construction work hours, and the applicant's construction mitigation plan, which indicates proposed work hours from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, would mitigate these impacts. (D) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE HEXRPT.doc The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Report, prepared by Geo Group Northwest, Inc. dated June 14, 2004. The report concludes that the site is generally underlain by alluvium, consisting of interbedded sands, silts and gravels derived from the erosion of the upriver glacial deposits. Specifically, the soils in the upper 9.5 feet to 12.5 feet consist of loose/soft fill and silty alluvial sediments. The fill at the north end of the site was approximately 8.5 feet think and contains concrete rubble. Below the upper loose/soft soil zone the soils encountered consisted of medium dense to dense alluvial interbedded silt sands, silts and gravels. According to the geotechnical report, the proposed buildings may be supported on concrete piles, helical anchors, short aggregate piers, or the unsuitable soils may be over-excavated and replaced with appropriate structural fill. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequately mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. The building has been designed to be approximately 6 to 13 feet from Burnett Avenue South, which ensures that sufficient open space will be provided along the western boundary of the site. In addition, the applicant has provided several internal open space areas for the project residents, which ensures privacy and security throughout the building. Lastly, the building has been City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-010, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19. 2004 Page90f 10 designed to be in scale with other similar multi-family complexes and also has been scaled-down along the northern property boundary in order to better fit into the surrounding built environment. (E) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES The proposed senior retirement multi-family development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. Adding residential population to downtown would improve the customer base for commercial businesses and the completed project is also expected to increase property values. Moreover, as a result of this development, this area of the City's downtown would be enhanced. (F) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Vehicles will enter and exit the parking garage and surface parking area via a 20-foot wide public alley/easement from South Tobin Street to Williams Avenue South (on the east side of the building). In addition, the site would contain a porte-cochere (covered and looped driveway) to be utilized by pedestrians and vehicles for drop off and pick up at the main building entrance (on the west side of the building). The pedestrians and vehicles would be separated by a 12 -20-foot wide cement drive, which would clearly demark where vehicles and/or pedestrians would be permitted. Similarly, the internal parking levels will provide a clear and defined drive isle, while also denoting where pedestrians are allowed to walk. The project is located in the central business district and therefore parking exempt (at the time of application submittal). If the project were subject to parking ratios, the City would impose a minimum requirement of 155 stalls (1.0 stalls for each unit/apartment). The applicant is voluntarily proposing to provide 101 parking stalls in structured parking located under the building and a nine stall surface lot parking area. The applicant submitted a traffic study/parking analysis prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates, dated June 2004. The analysis concluded that the Institute for Traffic Engineers (ITE) manual predicts a minimum of 18 parking stalls to a maximum of 78 stalls would be sufficient to serve the site. In addition, the report reviewed other similar retirement residences including Clare Bridge and Woodmark at Steel Lake both in Federal Way and the Kamlu in Vancouver, Washington. The report notes that the maximum observed parking demand for the Woodmark at Steel Lake was 0.42 stalls per unit and the maximum at Kamlu was 0.29 stalls per unit. As noted above, the Merrill Gardens project would provide 0.65 stalls per unit; therefore, the report concludes that the 101 parking stalls are sufficient. It should also be noted that the site is located approximately 300 feet south of the proposed retirement residence, which could also be utilized in the future should demand warrant its use. Nevertheless, in order to ensure the project provides adequate parking, the ERC required the project keep the nine surface level parking stalls unless a reduction is approved by the City's Development Services Division. According to the ITE manual, the 155-unit retirement residence would generate 453 daily trips to the City's street system. As a result, the ERC required that the applicant pay a traffic mitigation fee in the amount of $75.00 per new trip associated with the project. The parking plan appears to provide adequate aisle widths and backout distance (24 feet) for the safe and efficient circulation of vehicles. Construction truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. The Traffic Planning Section will review construction-related impacts prior to issuing final construction permits. (G) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR HEXAPT.doc The residential units comprise a portion of the ground floor level as well as the upper three stories of the proposed building. The residential units are on top of the parking garage and incorporate building modulation and articulation to break up the building bulk and mass. This allows adequate natural light and air to reach all the residential units. The height of the proposed building is not expected to cast significant shade impacts on surrounding buildings. Furthermore, the applicant City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 19. 2004 Page 10 of 10 has not provided a detailed lighting plan; however, as the building footprint consumes most of the subject site, staff does not anticipate the requirement for additional security lighting. (H) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a residential population. The applicant has indicated that the trash collection and recycling areas will be contained within the building, near the alley entrance, which should also help to alleviate odor impacts on neighboring properties. (I) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE Fire Department, Police and Parks staff have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal, subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees. As imposed by the ERC, the applicant will be required to pay Fire and Parks Mitigation fee prior to the issuance of building permits. Water service and other utilities are available in Burnett Avenue South and would be extended as necessary to the building by the applicant as required by City code. As the subject site is a senior retirement residence, the Renton School District was not notified. (J) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT The proposal would redevelop and improve a site that contains deteriorating buildings, which were formerly utilized by the McLendon Hardware store. The investment in the area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Merrill Gardens at Renton Center, Project File No. LUA-04-070, SA- H, ECF. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2) years from the final approval (signature) date. HEXRPT.doc , / , " )-",' " 1 ,. ," .... v , " , ". v, / ' Cl ' 1 L___________ __ '''-. '-. '. , '. 1 L ___ .----___ --------7 "",' " ____ 1 _____ : __ , p __ ---T 1/ / "'-" '-." '-. '> , " ----l---T ~ "/ -« '> '-. ",,' / " . 'I I ' , ":-' , , , l' -.. '" ----"'" 'v , --___ .~ , ' -<N~:L '.'/ < ,',/ /.~/ ___ ~ ~--TII-q-!T '1 . [~~.nAVE.",N-.,'v7' <~«?L~-TT1-n--!-T H i i ! ! ! , j: Wm --, -1 , "I ,~' ,---( /""'/"" / & / i I ! , '!ll ' cn L -------J ___ l ___ J ___ l ___ 1 ___ l ______ L __ _ I , I I I ~" ' ',/ , , "'" ' , 'l ' J l J s---' .,....... _ _ j ___ Lj::::~)-' /'<"'-.,,</''-.,., // """<~ Y/'~~---------------,gT"~ n'!v.F~:,::, n.A'nnnT'TnT""nT""'ln.'l f ___ ta---"nn, '-" '\ y /~~, 'T~nf'-l r _ "I I I " J ,/ ~<''A ">/ /( ~ ~~ZTr'nnnn'n , "MULTI" ! i ! ! "" CO""ERT.LLnnL",~",Lf1- --1--/1 '7 "5--'-/ '-. / ' ~ / i I CHURCH , '"m YL! i i .J_.J N::::::)r::-r--r----------L-----i ~ ~, /', '" / G, " t L '~.~. l " I -I.(J) ,/ ~"",/< -',-/ / ,L". ---t-~'II--I--r' ! ! CO?"ERCIAL ~ CO",ERClIAL!, j[~-=~-_J L_ """'" /v '-.,'\ / , / T TI 'I 'I ' I SINGLE F AM I L, Y !! l' _J l~ ____ --J ______ ~L----------------' '/ ' I I , ", YE S __ _ --n,,,,,, n""",X:",.-/ .....: i i LLnLLLYi' f[-' --sn,! • "Lnnn,-,-nnn'rnnn'rTnnnl r ""'-",,/-, ---;r-,"' __ ,jnn, ... n, n, , , nn ,n nnnl I 'I' iii 1 "'7" , U oJ -------1---- -, " COMMERCIAL, " ", ' ", "n '_, / ""'.L~, ,------, ~---T---r-I I I, i ' , RET A I L : 1 1 L _______ L_)::::::::~ f------' , "'Z ' '" I I "nnnn n"nnn 1 ': / / /: : ---' 'I 'I . Sl NOLE "MIL Y, , ""''''''o''',-nnnT, " " '" llllJ :, ", I:, ' , '" <...... , , n , , -", , , ,/ / / li ii ..... n.L~n"n n"n SURFACE PARKING 1 r----MULlTI1FAMILY1I, J' __ j l ___ _ ' , " " W '"'"" , , n"n, " / " MULT I :, :=; 'SITE : : ________________ _ ' '" ~ ~ 'n,_ / / F Am Y if 8 ' nn'A'HE---S r----// ,/ // __ IL ____ J 8rU~ "In,I1J'-~'J • n, ,-nTnrTnnnnn'7 'nn / ".--.-~ l nnnnn, _ SURF ACE PARK 1_~.9-----~ r-----r l 'I 'I' ; ' , nn nnn -__ ,_ 1, I RANS IT ' / fnnn,U)-nnT r , , C"",R.I __ ,------'r 'I _ '" T : ¢ / ,/ Y I COMMERC I AL i i COM'ERCl AL '! )--'::':::-r--T i ! ! PAR~ I NG ! , 'CENTER ,I Q' Ii / / MULT I F AM I L ! VACANT L 'i __ ---1 J _---------T 11 ' I COMMER.: : STRU1TURE I 1--1 ; t1~ I 1 / 1. --. ---'---,--.-f----,:,~--'1 , J -'! Ii, iii I/!/"'I i / ------,--. -----, CO'",ReIAL ,~--'r i i f--' 'I iii i i ! , _" ;:;tLJ ~'---r-'~ ~-J SINGLE ""LY "RETAlL, " l------,L __ LL ____ :;~~: " , L __ , -------,---) r--,---P t~ j -VE "5-----, "'1Ji ' / '--'T' r ! __ __ " __ , :. j ____ , L_ -------r----r----,-----, COMM.l 1 I SINGLEL FAMLIL1Y L-----Lt-O 'Jr. --"--------r----------------Tlfl:! i . '-' " COMM ' "1 J --l'1 1 __ r r , 11:, , :: : : J' , l' :, ---------- -__ _ _ --r-': , / :>'!lj , , "--, ----, --, , -, , ,~~ , , --~--,L ______ ,j __ L __ , --------------,' --r--1--_ I , , 'II 'I ' i 1: f I (jiC L------i I--,---------------T'-, , i I I I --, I '-,1-----77: , 0:: -------, r--l----r---,--------l r--T--l 1 , "I' L L--l--,i----L-.l __ ~ __ _i L :--__ I !!, r "." "I I I L -1 J _ ___ __ , , ", , "I I I " -, . -----'I M Q ~~~l.~ t-1LLL_~ ~LL_.J ~ Neighborhood Det81 8_ , __ .. ~ '0::' 400 .... 200 -<C>- <C 23: o 50 100 r----, , , , , ~.--, , , , , , , ~---, , , , , L ___ _ if !I ~ j @) , , ~ , , , , , , , , . ! i I J , , , , . : ~ " , , , .,.. , , , , , , , ,--, , , I"', , i 1 Ii '.1--i5! ,. ,... G> , V ~ I .,:': i /i I' 8 , ; \. ! ", \ ~ ; .t \: !!I! Il i\~ 1 ,;5 I'. Ii: ; ri·• ... :: ,! P:! Ii :; II I, r t';"; , , ~ , , , I ====================================1 .III·~ I r --II -=~~ 1,::"'--:: aJl uoJUOluoll@ SN.3mIVO llImmwA\'j iii .: :: . ::: ::.-: ',':: I 6UBId 1001:1 puooes PUB 18l1:1! LJ 011110:) DOlllOlI@ SN3mIV D l1IIDI3W 4I;fi 0 I: II I·=.-.: o.qUOJUOIO.lI@ SN3mIVD TIIIDI3W4lllJ 0 Ilil .I·~II"::;I'·:::"-:: OJIu.:>uoluoll@SN3mIVD llIID13W4IJjJ n •. ..:'"= I NVld 3dVOSONVl 11001.:1 J.sl:!I.:I1 LJ I J [ 1OI-f'It-H+-i--f\+;Ib-... _--. __ .--_ .. _ .. __ .. _. [ @ DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTlNG o LARGE TRELLIS ElEVATION ® SMALL TRELLIS ELEVATION ® STREETTREEINGRAlE Fifth Floor Landscape Plan CD SHRUB PLANTING Second Floor Landscape Plan =-=:. •• =.:~ ~=-~" ,"'. ! .:'. ---:;-.1-'" .. q G:,.;." I =-PI..N\I '-_crw. SECllON AT FRNoE :':::--.L ~ WEISMAN DESIGII GROUP~ •-......... . mllISf_mm ..... --.. ===-~ () ~ NORTH SCALE ,~. 2a-O" ·0 10 "1 ,'; 'I' 1:1,. i ,llIf ! ·11 ·11 illl II!!l;II ;mr. 11111'I;j' 'IIHII~liSi:!: ~ I.lIlill CI) 1~~I:i ..... 11. ~ (..) CI) 'I~ I~ ~ o It I;:I: 1~llI. ~ ,'" '!I~ 0 I, Z i:I~Il' ; ,.0 .1 (..) -.~:II ~ if If ~ j ® <Zl I o i ::;s 1"'8 1111 ;1 Lt2 / ~ V --...... - -... ~ ~ ~ • r---'. . = = .,L, I-- ~. ,..., .10..0 ~ ~~ I I I ===================='1 HORIZONTAL QAJW an Of RENTON, NAO 83/'" WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM. NORTH ZONE. BASEO ON HORIZONTAl.. CONTROL POINTS 205 AND 1887. POINT 205 BEING A MON IN CASE AT THE INTERS£.CllON Of BURNETT AVE AND 2ND ST,; POINT 18!7 BINING A BRASS PlUG AT THE INTtRSECllON Of RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND KLlS A\o£. ymmQAb QADIN CIty Of RENTON, NAVO ee BASED ON art VERTICAl.. CONTRa.. MARK NUWBER 1939 ~TH A PUBUSHED ELEVATION OF 11.383 METERS. 11.3e3 WEYERS ~ 39.37/12_31.345 ITET. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: ~~~.GIt~~'J-­=..~~-... ~~ I. m.T~ __ .w.I.OCA_tlAl.l.on.. ~ UllSlD. c:oNTACl Al.l.U1UTY -..n .... , ~~1~~~1ICG..: 1 ~_lO..mnNOU1UfY""" __ CICIIIm1IIC1OI. ~W1rrIlilMEl_lQCIIIII'-.c1I:II I'UOQ£-.o I. 1NST'OU'ST __ ~OO_'R._r_ ~-:".:=r,"~..=sO~~ .-.cnOTf~~.aIIII(CU --~~=~_,----.a_ 1. a.LM .. __ or ..... lO._MIIIOIGI ~ L IIDIOC 1RUl'-": __ ........ AI ____ 11.IGTIIU.CWVlUJO.._InLClIIIIlIUCl_' ="'W1ll~~_QI11IIIII. :-'a.ul[ ST~_" ~ ~ \MIICM'I: ~7..d£.=":t~=--_-:'1ID ~or~':==~~=-~ ~~_canao..rMl.l1U_.lllS ~ .. - "1'" . I • LEGEND _. ...... _lDI"lII.. --ir'iJii'i.\'IHflI :;~-==:-~~ E3 o!o I!l~ ~ l . " ==:= =:~ ==::: ~ ;z;:;; ~ 1'tttl'1'11!11 ~1!6'~:~1 -+ GRAPHIC SCALE .. ,n.l··II:" :~:~~S~I~ . / I'" -·-r'·;""'·-""="·l··'''·-~''···-·'l, 1_ J ~ i~~ ./i il .. . ..... , """" ,~. ----.. -. ---- ,,.,,'z/ I ,. Or. "~'1/ 'i ;L~---c' --::.~~~-'':~=~'.=~;i""-_. __ -:'~ c----. __ ~~~.~~~,l~: "1 { J .• 'J1"" .. ~ ~I.!; I' ,r.r.. . k ~ .. ' : ~ 4 " ... --.. ,. ""'r-' -I ~-.-.~-i"--'-'M .... <'y.}., ... ":-",,.,,",. \i? i H • -J J L----:----.:...~ I .... "':"i:, .. ,, ... J8';'*,~d';:vvm.'" ., ::(,.:. .--T" .J .. ~-~~\. __ ,m __ "! I U nt " 1/\ / . , i .il ' !: '/;; ;j', . ,;~ /1: II,. 'r·!.'; , "; '" ,.~ . W~~ SF r" <-~ ~ ~,,~, l'l ~"'-,-.1',1 ~, -',e' t:"" ' ,-~,,,,, ,_."" .. ·jlL-~.··-~·~ · "ToW..~;' ~ CAunON: i~: t~ ~~~f ... ~ •• ~"'" ''''I~, ... :t ~ ".fl,U' '>'':'-').:!~~-- "~ I.===~~~-==-~~~ ~ :~Ml.~~~~GN~::CS~ ~.!}::' --- ,.: ,.~lII""""~~"'-"'lJDfIOIO'III.. I'01MDI.M01HEUlUlDNCI~1HlIlCJllllZONT""""VEJII1ICN.LOCoJ.1lON ~~ 4.=-~~~IT~l(_~MT SUUQI_ ~~:~1a,~irs== .1, .. ---.. -.~---. ."""""' ............ "" ... .....,.. ....... IDIUT' ... _· PERMIT DRAWINGS ~=~ pp_~ lVlIESOl'4A1.LP'ftCIIDaP'tl:lClltl'Of"ItOCQlIIGlmHCIONS1JIUC'II(I -:i ~ ,..,..... Soor..orln9 fIl1OO«;( ..... ro 1».11 · '].1 --.!!..-~ p_ ."~"' .. c_ ...... ___ '.. .... FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT :::""" JUNE. 200' MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE I ~ OM_ "" ~ .,. ..... _---_:u -'-P.O. BOX 1018 . ""_~IMC DEMOLITION PLAN : --"'" (en) A'·IO" ,_ .... _ r .. ,.al a'· Mol MERCER ISlAND WA 98040 · t omIJI...I!I......--• -• Call before you DIg· 1-800-424-5555 --.... • iL. 04441.00 9IDJ!.t..Q...fE TO: Phone: City of Renton DevelopmentSeNices Division 1055 South Grady Way, 6th Fir Renton, WA 98055 Steve Johnston Curtis Beattie (206) 282-8512 Date: 10/7/04 FROM: Jason Jordan City of Renton Phone: (425) 430-7219 Fax Phone: (206) 282-4799 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 SUBJECT: Brandal Vii/age Final Wetland Plan Number of pages including cover sheet: 1 REMARKS: D Original to D Urgent D Reply be mailed ASAP Steve, this is for your file, please provide to your contractors. Regards, Jason -. " .~··"I.:.n:~' .. ,~,:' '" •. ~ . - Da-nfnn .J.. "vJ.J.lV~.I-. Ahead of the curve D Please ~ For your Comment review • (ab ~%r ?~i~!s~!~:r Seattle Public Utilities Chuck Clarke, Director October 1, 2004 City of Renton Development Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Gary Zimmerman OEVElOPMENTSE~CES CITY OF RENTON OCT 05 2004 RE'CEIVED -- RECEIVED OCT 0 ~ 20tJIt CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN RE: LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF Merrill Gardens at Renton Center Dear Mr. Zimmerman: This letter serves as a reminder that Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) operates a water transmission pipeline within S 2nd St. If the construction of this project requires work within S. 2nd St., Seattle Public Utilities needs to have the opportunity to review approve the plans for construction or installation of facilities within 10 feet of the pipeline. Utility crossings of our pipeline should be at a right angle. SPU prefers 10 feet of horizontal separation for parallel installations. When possible SPU prefers utility crossings to be over its pipeline with a minimum vertical separ- ation of 18 inches for sewer and 12 inches for water and other utilities. SPU would like all utilities that cross the ESSL to be in caSing that extends at least 10 feet on either side of the pipeline. Any work in close proximity to our pipeline (including locating by potholing) must be supervised by . SPU. Call SPU's Lake Youngs Headquarters at 425-255-2242 at least 48 hours in advance. If you or the applicant should need any additional information please contact me at 206-684-5969 or e-mail bob.gambill@cLseattle.wa.us. )J;;Y~ ( Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent City of Seattle Seattle Public Utilities Real Property Services Key Tower, Suite 4900 700 5th Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-5004 Seattle Municipal Tower, 700 5th Ave, Suite 4900, PO Box 34018, Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Tel: (206) 684-5851, TTY/TDD: (206) 233-7241, Fax: (206) 684-4631, Internet Address: http://www.seattle.gov/util/ An equal employment opportunity, affirmative action employer. Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE.-MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre PROJECT NUMBER: LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue S , DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of anew market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building Is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will Include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls. The structure Is planned to contain two lower levels of parking. The lowest level of parking will be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise the eastern half of the first floor (at grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. The development, at It maximum height, Is proposed to be approximately 62 feet above existing grade. The proposal also Includes street frontage Improvements, on-site landscaping, and the development of a 9-stall temporary parking lot, which would be located east of the proposed building. Access to the site Is proposed from Burnett Avenue South, which Includes a porte-cochere In front of the main entrance for vehicular drop-offs/plck-ups and pedestrians. However, access to the vehicular parking under the building and the nine stall surface level parking Is proposed from the 15-foot wide public alley way located east of the site from South Tobin Street. The project Includes the demolition of three large open air sheds, totaling approximately 9,650 square feet and a 5,580 square foot concrete building, In addition to the surface parking area all utilized by the former McLendon's Hardware store. Construction Improvements are anticipated to begin In early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of the same year. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 11, 2004. Appeals must be flied In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City .of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 19, 2004 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor CITV.F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator September 23, 2004 Steve Johnston Curtis Beattie & Associates 3131 Elliott Avenue #270 Seattle, WA 98121 SUBJECT: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Johnston: , . This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional 'information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on October 19, 2004 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you' one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. . For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~ roNa""" Jord.""'-... Jason E. Jordan Senior Planner cc: James G. Johnson, Jim Medzegian, Violet Meekin, Artice Slemko / Parties of Record Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC, Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. / Owner Enclosure --------::1:-:::O-:-55~S::-o-u-:-th-=G::-ra-d::-y-==W::-:-a-y--R=-e-n-to-n-=, W:=a'-s-:-hi::-n-gt-on~98=O:-::5:-:-5 ------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE '. CITV.F RENTON' Kathy Keolker-Wheeler. Mayor September 23, 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) on September 21, 2004: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre LUA04-070, SA~H, ECF 104 Burnett Avenue S The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 unde~ structure, parking stalls. The' structure is planned to contain two lower levels of p~'lrking. The lowest level of parking will~eapproximately 6 feet below grade, while the second I«!vel of, parking will' comprise the east~rn half of the first floor (at grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking lev.els. The development, at its maximum height, is proposed to be approximately 62 feet above , exist,ing grade. Appeals of the enviro,nmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 11, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with·tHe required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055~ Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219 For the Environmental Review Committee, \::0.~~0tli['/~ Fo r JoS 011 J OvalW\.... Jason E. Jordan Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Enclosure ~ --------:l:-::-O-=-SS~S=-o-u-:-tb--:G~ra-,d:-y-:::W,-::-a-y--R=-e-o-to-o--:, W,:':":a-,s7"bl:-·0-gt-oo--=-9S::-:0:-"::S-=-S------R E NT 0 N * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF PROJECT NAME: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre APPLICANT: Steve Johnston LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 104 Burnett Avenue S DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls. The structure is planned to contain two lower levels of parking. The lowest level of parking will be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise the eastern half of the first floor (at grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. The development, at its maximum height, is proposed to be approximately 62 feet above existing grade. LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The finished ground at the site shall be graded such that surface water is directed away from the building structure. Water shall not be allowed to stand in areas where footings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 2. Footing drains shall be installed around the perimeter foundation. The drains shall consist of a four-inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at or near the bottom of the footings or grade beams with a gradient sufficient to generate flow. The drain lines shall be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining rock or free-draining granular material. The drain rock and drain line should be surrounded by a geotextile filter fabric. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. Roof drains shall be separately tightlined to discharge into the storm water collection system and shall not be connected to the footing drain system. Cleanouts shall be installed to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drains and roof downspout tightline systems. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 4. The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures subject to the 2001 Department of Ecology's Erosion Control Manual. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 5. The applicant shall conduct and complete an archaeological assessment for the project area prior to building permit issuance. The archaeological assessment, including conclusions and recommendations, shall be forwarded to OAHP and the affected Tribes for comment. If archaeological resources are identified during the assessment and cannot be avoided, mitigation measures will be developed and commenced in consultation with the City, OAHP, and the affected Tribes, in conformance with RCW 27.53, RCW 27.44 and WAC 25-48, prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per new multi-family unit and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. The applicant shall be required to keep the nine proposed surface level parking stalls unless a reduction in parking is approved by the City's Development Services Division. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new unit prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON·SIGNIFICANCE·MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF PROJECT NAME: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre APPLICANT: Steve Johnston LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 104 Burnett Avenue S DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls. The structure is planned to contain two lower levels of parking. The lowest level of parking will be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise the eastern half of the first floor (at grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. The development, at its maximum height, is proposed to be approximately 62 feet above existing grade. LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The fol/owing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Center Downtown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or, plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. Property Services -Information 1. None. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5,000 GPM. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Any existing fire hydrants shall be up to current standards including a 5-inch storz fitting. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems and standpipe· systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-feet in width with a turning radius of 45-foot outside and 25-foot inside. (Please note, the applicant cannon meet this requirement on the east side of the building adjacent to the alley. Fire code allows modifications if the building is fully fire sprinklered, so as an alternative to approved access the applicant shall provide standpipe outlets on the alley side of the building). 4. The public alley vacation a'.ation is required prior to building permaance. 5. The new alleyway is required to meet the minimum Fire Department turning radius. Plan Review -Water 1. This project is within the CD zone, therefore the Water System Development Charge (SDC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.213 x the square footage of the site. Total fees for water is $15,053.78 at 70,675 sq. feet. 10,500 square feet of the existing site was previously paid in 1980. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for all existing water connections. 2. Preliminary fire flow is 5,000 gpm. Applicant will need five hydrants to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structure and five additional shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. Applicant has not shown the locations of all hydrants. 3. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection, will be required to be retrofitted with a 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. Fire flow exceeding 2,500 gpm requires a looped system. A water main extension in Williams Ave S will be required to increase fire flow to serve this site as the existing 6-inch main is not adequate .. 5. A fire sprinkler system is required by the Fire Department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation the double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if backflow device is to be installed inside the building. 6. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on the domestic water meter. 7. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer 1. This project is within in the CD zone, therefore the Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.126 x the square footage of the site. Total fees for sewer is $8,905.05 at 70,675 sq. feet. 10,500 square feet of the existing site was previously paid in 1980. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for all existing sewer connections. 2. Food preparation facilities are proposed. A grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit will be required for installations inside the building. 3. Side sewers shall be 2% minimum slope. 4. Parking garages will require floor drains and floor drains shall be connected to the sanitary sewer through an approved oil/water separator located outside the building, wherever possible. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. Plan Review -Transportation 1. Improvements including reconstruction of city sidewalks, curb, gutter, paving, storm drainage and streetlights may be required during construction, including new curb cuts. 2. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. Plan Review -Storm Drainage 1. No Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC) are owed on this site. 2. Applicant has submitted a drainage report and drainage plans for review. Preliminary review shows that applicant has addressed the core and special requirements per the 1990 KCSWM. The TIR demonstrates that detention and water quality are not required at this site. 3. A temporary erosion contr_n will be required and shall be installe~ maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Plan Review -General 1. Separate permits for side sewers, water meters, landscape irrigation meter and any backflow devices will be required. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. 3. All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Proper drainage measures are required. The following note shall be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 5. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 6. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 7. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 8. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND REPORT DATE Project Name Applicant File Number Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area CRITERIA: City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations September 21, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC. C/O Friedman Development PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, WA 98040 LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Project Manager Jason E. Jordan The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls and nine surface parking stalls. The structure is planned to contain two lower levels of parking, with the lowest level of parking to be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise the first floor (above grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. 104 Burnett Avenue South All existing buildings will be removed with the exception of a 12,906 square foot commercial building 81,175 square feet (1.86 acres) Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf Total Building Area gsf 193,960 square feet 206,866 square feet 1. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN i. Pedestrian Building Entries -Minimum Standards: Require buildings to be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the fa9ade facing the street. The main entry to the proposed senior housing complex faces Burnett Avenue South, while vehicular parking is located to the east off of a public alley from South Tobin Street. The applicant has highlighted the building entrance by creating an elevated porte-cochere or covered vehicular/pedestrian drop-off/pick- up area as an extension of the building's main entry feature. The proposed pedestrian walkways provide clear connections to the sidewalk from the building's main entrance. In addition, individual units at grade level along Burnett Avenue South are proposed to contain their own private entries onto Burnett Avenue South. Guidelines focus on providing clear architectural entrance features with lobbies, canopies and ornamental lighting. Also encouraged are pedestrian pathways, plazas and landscaping. Staff has worked with the applicant to provide a well-defined main entrance to the proposed facility. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. No additional guidelines are suggested. ii. Transition to Surrounding Development -Minimum Standards: Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: • CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF APPLICANT: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PROJECT NAME: Merrill Gardens at Renton Center DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls. The structure is planned to contain two lower levels of parking. The lowest level of parking will be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise the eastern half of the first floor (at grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. The development, at it maximum height is proposed to be approximately 62 feet above existing grade. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 104 Burnett Avenue South The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Gregg im Department ~~ Dennis Culp, Administrator Community Services Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Renton Fire Department SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 DATE ·r ' DATE STAFF REPORT • • City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE Project Name: Applicant: Owner: File Number: Project Manager: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: Site Area: RECOMMENDATION: Project Location Map September 21,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC C/O Friedman Development PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. 715 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 LUA-04-070, ECF, SA-H Jason E. Jordan The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls. The structure is planned to contain two lower levels of parking. The lowest level of parking will be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise the eastern half of the first floor (at grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. See additional project description on the following page. 104 Burnett Avenue South 28,136 sf (12,906 to remain) Proposed New Bldg. Area: . 193,960 sf 81,175sf Total Building Area gsf: 206,866 sf ERCRPT.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department ~ MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CE;t/II REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21,2004 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONTINUED: Env~ntal Review Committee Staff Report .... LUA-04-010, ECF, SA-H Page20fB The development, at it maximum height is proposed to be approximately 62 feet above existing grade. The proposal also includes street frontage improvements, on-site landscaping, and the development of a 9-stall temporary parking lot, which would be located east of the proposed building. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South, which includes a porte-cochere in front of the main entrance for vehicular drop- offs/pick-ups and pedestrians. However, access to the vehicular parking under the building and the nine stall surface level parking is proposed from the 15-foot wide public alley way located east of the site from South Tobin Street. The project includes the demolition of three large open air sheds, totaling approximately 9,650 square feet and a 5,580 square foot concrete building, in addition to the surface parking area all utilized by the former McLendon's Hardware store. Construction improvements are anticipated to begin in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of the same year. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF XX NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the fol/owing project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is considered to be generally flat and has less than a one percent slope from north to south. The site was developed with an existing parking lot and three open air sheds, which are proposed to be removed or demolished as a result of this proposal. The site does not contain any vegetation other than a sparsely planted five- foot landscape strip adjacent to Burnett Avenue South and South Tobin Street. The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Report, prepared by Geo Group Northwest, Inc. dated June 14, 2004. The report concludes that the site is generally underlain by alluvium, conSisting of interbedded sands, silts and gravels derived from the erosion of the upriver glacial deposits. Specifically, the soils in the upper 9.5 feet to 12.5 feet consist of loose/soft fill and silty alluvial sediments. The fill at the north end of the site was approximately 8.5 feet thick and contains concrete rubble. Below the upper loose/soft soil zone the soils encountered consisted of medium dense to dense alluvial interbedded silt sands, silts and gravels. According to the geotechnical report, the proposed buildings may be supported on concrete piles, helical anchors, short aggregate piers, or the unsuitable soils may be over- excavated and replaced with appropriate structural fill. The geotechnical report concludes that the site is compatible with the proposed development with the following three recommended drainage related conditions: 1. The finished ground at the site should be graded such that surface water is directed away from the building structure. Water should not be allowed to stand in areas where footings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. 2. Footing drains should be installed around the perimeter foundation. The drains should consist of a four-inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at or near the bottom of the footings or grade beams with a gradient sufficient to generate flow. The drain lines should be bedded on, surrounded by and covered with a free-draining rock or free-draining granular material. The drain rock and drain line should be surrounded by a geotextile filter fabric. 3. Roof drains should be separately tightlined to discharge into the storm water collection system and should not be connected to the footing drain system. Cleanouts should be installed to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drains and roof downspout tightline systems. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department ~ MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENW REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21,2004 Env~ntal Review Committee Staff Report .~ LUA-04-070, ECF, SA-H Page 3 ot8 As a result of the geotechnical report staff recommends that the three recommended conditions become adopted SEPA mitigation measures. The Potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequately mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. However, in order to ensure neighboring properties are not impacted by potential erosion caused by the development of this site, staff recommends that the applicant be required to adhere to the 2001 Department of Ecology Erosion Control Manual. This condition would ensure neighboring properties would not be negatively impacted by the development of this site. Mitigation Measures: • The finished ground at the site shall be graded such that surface water is directed away from the building structure. Water shall not be allowed to stand in areas where footings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. • Footing drains shall be installed around the perimeter foundation. The drains shall consist of a four-inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at or near the bottom of the footings or grade beams with a gradient sufficient to generate flow. The drain lines shall be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free- draining rock or free-draining granular material. The drain rock and drain line should be surrounded by a geotextile filter fabric. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. • Roof drains shall be separately tightlined to discharge into the storm water collection system and shall not be connected to the footing drain system. Cleanouts shall be installed to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drains and roof downspout tightline systems. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. • The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures subject to the 2001 Department of Ecology's Erosion Control Manual. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 1. Water Impacts: There are no surface water bodies nor wetlands located on the site or in the immediate vicinity of the site. The Cedar River is located over 200 feet from the subject site. The project site is approximately 100% impervious (existing parking areas, sheds and access ways) with the only exceptions being a five-foot wide planter strip adjacent to Burnett Avenue South and South Tobin Street. Upon completion of the project, the site would remain mostly impervious; however, there would be an approximately 300 square foot reduction in impervious surface area. With the project application, a level one drainage analysis prepared by Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated June 2004 was submitted. According to the drainage narrative, existing drainage from the subject site flows into a series of pipes and ultimately drains into the Cedar River, approximately 0.2 miles downstream from the subject site. As the site is approximately 100% impervious in its current condition, the senior housing project is exempt form flow control and biofiltration/water quality requirements since it proposes to add less than 5,000 square feet of new impervious area. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: N/A 3. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: According to the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, the subject site is located near known significant archaeological sites and the Office requested that additional studies be conducted. At the State's request, the applicant submitted a preliminary Cultural Resource Assessment, dated August 10, 2004. The assessment was prepared by Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc. The preliminary report noted that nine exploratory shovel probes along the western edge of the property were dug in order to gauge the thickness of the fill and to determine if there is potential for intact buried surfaces. The archeologist notes that there has been some disturbance associated with the current use, but the sediments exposed in the shovel probes indicate the project site retains potential to harbor archaeological materials. Therefore, the consultant recommends more thorough assessment with a backhoe. However, the current use (McLendon's Hardware Store) is ERCRPT.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department ~ MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENfft REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21,2004 Envi"'ntal Review Committee Staff Report ~ LUA-04-070, ECF, SA-H Page 40'8 still operating on the project site and will not be moving into their new location until later this year, which limits the amount of exploration allowed. Since most of the project area is covered by the store parking lot and lumber shed buildings, further exploration is not possible. In light of this, the archeologist recommends that the archaeological assessment be postponed until the current tenant has moved to their new location. As a result of this recommendation, staff contacted the Washington State Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation to determine if requiring the applicant to conduct their archaeological assessment after environmental (SEPA) review and site plan approval would be acceptable. In a September 14, 2004 letter, Stephenie Kramer, Assistant State Archaeologist, indicated that a subsequent archaeological evaluation would be acceptable provided that the SEPA determination included the following mitigation language: The applicant shall conduct and complete an archaeological assessment for the project area prior to building permit issuance. The archaeological assessment, including conclusions and recommendations, shall be forwarded to OAHP and the affected Tribes for comment. If archaeological resources are identified during the assessment and cannot be avoided, mitigation measures will be developed and commenced in consultation with the City, OAHP, and the affected Tribes, in conformance with RCW 27.53, RCW 27.44 and WAC 25-48, prior to building permit issuance. Therefore, staff recommends that this language become a condition of the environmental (SEPA) threshold determination. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall conduct and complete an archaeological assessment for the project area prior to building permit issuance. The archaeological assessment, including conclusions and recommendations, shall be forwarded to OAHP and the affected Tribes for comment. If archaeological resources are identified during the assessment and cannot be avoided, mitigation measures will be developed and commenced in consultation with the City, OAHP, and the affected Tribes, in conformance with RCW 27.53, RCW 27.44 and WAC 25-48, prior to building permit issuance. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 4. Fire Prevention Impacts: Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development provided the applicant completes required improvements and makes payment of necessary fees. The proposal would include the construction of a new 193,960 square foot 155-unit senior retirement complex that would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. Therefore, staff recommends a Fire Mitigation Fee estimated at $60,140.00 (155 units x $388.00 = $60,140.00) be required for the proposal. The payment of the fee would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per new multi-family unit and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527. 5. Transportation/Parking Impacts: Vehicular access to the subject site is proposed at two locations -primary vehicular drop-off/pick-up access is proposed on the west side of the site (Burnett Avenue South) via a circular turn-about that connects with the main entrance of the building. Parking access is planned on the east side of the site (via a 15-foot public alley from South Tobin Street). The applicant has noted a five-foot setback adjacent to the alleyway in order to create a 20-foot wide drive to the parking area associated with the project. In addition, the applicant has proposed to vacate a portion of public alleyway running easVwest connecting the north/south alleyway to Burnett Avenue South and replace it with a new 20-foot wide easement connecting the public alleyway to Williams Avenue South. The applicant has proposed two levels of parking, with each level containing approximately 46 parking stalls. In addition, the applicant is proposing to provide nine temporary parking stalls located east of the existing building, directly adjacent to the proposed alley easement and building to remain on site for a total of 101 parking stalls. At the time of application submittal, the City did not have required parking standards within the downtown. Subsequently to that date, the City now requires one parking stall per unit. In this case the applicant is proposing to provide 0.65 stalls per unit (including the 9 temporary surface parking stalls). The applicant submitted a traffic study/parking analysis prepared by Christopher Brown & Associates, dated June 2004. The analysis concluded that the Institute for Traffic Engineers (ITE) manual predicts a minimum of 18 parking stalls to a maximum of 78 stalls would be sufficient to serve the site. In addition, the report reviewed other similar retirement resiqences including Clare Bridge and Woodmark at Steel Lake both in Federal Way and the Kamlu in Vancouver, Washington. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department ~ MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENffI REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21,2004 Env~ntal Review Committee Staff Report .~ LUA-04-010, ECF, SA-H PageS 0(8 The report notes that the maximum observed parking demand for a similar project, the Woodmark at Steel Lake, was 0.42 stalls per unit and the maximum at Kamlu was 0.29 stalls per unit. As noted above, the Merrill Gardens project would provide 0.65 stalls per unit; therefore, the report concludes that the 101 parking stalls are sufficient. It should also be noted that the site is located approximately 300 feet south of an existing municipal parking garage, which could also be utilized for parking in the future should demand warrant its use. Nevertheless, in order to ensure the project provides adequate parking, staff recommends that the project be required to keep the nine parking stalls unless a reduction is approved by the City's Development Services DiviSion. According to the ITE manual, the 155-unit retirement residence would generate 453 daily trip to the City's street system. However, the traffic study notes, "the project will not induce any adverse traffic impacts. Since the levels of service are all well within adopted standards and since the local street system's accident history does not portray the key access facility as having a significant historical frequency, no traffic mitigation measures are required. Fundamentally, the local street network will continue to function very well on completion of the project." The City of Renton Resolution (#3100) authorizing the collection of mitigation fees allows applicants the ability to prepare a professional report, which may dispute the standard fees collected. In this case, the applicant's traffic impact study concludes that the level of service associated with the neighboring streets will not be decreased. In addition, the report concludes that the project will not generate additional accidents or require any other form of mitigation directly associated with the project. Therefore, the report concludes that the project should not require any additional traffic mitigation, including the City's standard $75 a trip mitigation fee. As a result of this report, the City's Transportation Section prepared a City-wide transportation analysis, which reviewed existing deficient transportation projects/improvements and their associated costs, in relationship to the proposed Merrill Gardens development. As a result, the Rainier Avenue corridor, Duvall Avenue NE widening, Sunset/Duvall intersection, Park/Sunset Corridor and North 3rd & 4th widening were reviewed. The Transportation Section concluded that the project's fair share costs of those improvements would be $40,060 (see attached memo from Nick Afzali, dated 8/3/04). Therefore, staff recommend that the applicant be required to pay the standard traffic impact fee of $75 per new trip generated, which equates to $75 x 453 new trips = $33,975. It should be noted that this fee is less than the calculated impacts; however, it is the standard fee charged to all new developments as a result of Resolution #3100. Mitigation Measures: • The applicant shall be required to keep the nine proposed surface level parking stalls unless a reduction in parking is approved by the City's Development Services Division. • The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527. 6. Parks & Recreation Impacts: The proposal does not provide sufficient on-site recreation areas for future residents of the proposed project. There are existing recreational facilities in the area of the subject property (e.g., Jones Park and The Cedar River Trail) and it is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future demand on existing City parks and recreational facilities and programs. Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant be required to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per each new unit. The fee is estimated at $54,949.05 (155 new lots x $354.51 = $54,949.05) and is payable prior to the recording of the final plat. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new unit prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3082, Ordinance 4527. 7. Air/Noise Impacts: During project construction (commencing in early 2005 and being substantially completed by the end of that same year), vehicle and construction equipment emissions and dust will potentially be released. These impacts would be short-term limited to the construction phase of the project. The applicant would be required to submit a Construction Mitigation Plan, which would include measures to minimize construction impacts. Construction equipment noise would be mitigated by muffling equipment as required per standard construction standards and dust would be controlled using best management construction practices. The noise impacts are not considered significant due to the limited duration of the construction period and existing code provisions, which restrict construction hours ERCRPT.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department ~ MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CE:ffI REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21,2004 Env.ntal Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-070, ECF, SA-H Page 60f8 and equipment noises. The noise standards would be required to be in compliance with both the City of Renton and the Washington State standards. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: Not Applicable D. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The finished ground at the site shall be graded such that surface water is directed away from the building structure. Water shall not be allowed to stand in areas where footings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 2. Footing drains shall be installed around the perimeter foundation. The drains shall consist of a four-inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at or near the bottom of the footings or grade beams with a gradient sufficient to generate flow. The drain lines shall be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free- draining rock or free-draining granular material. The drain rock and drain line should be surrounded by a geotextile filter fabric. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 3. Roof drains shall be separately tightlined to discharge into the storm water collection system and shall not be connected to the footing drain system. Cleanouts shall be installed to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drains and roof downspout tightline systems. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division. 4. The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures subject to the 2001 Department of Ecology's Erosion Control Manual. The satisfaction of this condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 5. The applicant shall conduct and complete an archaeological assessment for the project area prior to building permit issuance. The archaeological assessment, including conclusions and recommendations, shall be forwarded to OAHP and the affected Tribes for comment. If archaeological resources are identified during the assessment and cannot be avoided, mitigation measures will be developed and commenced in consultation with the City, OAHP, and the affected Tribes, in conformance with RCW 27.53, RCW 27.44 and WAC 25-48, prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per new multi-family unit and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. The applicant shall be required to keep the nine proposed surface level parking stalls unless a reduction in parking is approved by the City's Development Services Division. 8. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per net new average trip generated by the project prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per new unit prior to the issuance of building permits. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. -L Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. ERCRPT.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department ... MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CE:fIt Env.ntal Review Committee Staff Report . LUA-04-070, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 Page 70'8 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. The site is designated Center Downtown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 2. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. Property Services -Information 1. None. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5,000 GPM. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. Any existing fire hydrants shall be up to current standards including a 5-inch storz fitting. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems and standpipe systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-feet in width with a turning radius of 45-foot outside and 25-foot inside. (Please note, the applicant cannon meet this requirement on the east side of the building adjacent to the alley. Fire code allows modifications if the building is fully fire sprinklered, so as an alternative to approved access the applicant shall provide standpipe outlets on the alley side of the building). 4. The public alley vacation and creation is required prior to building permit issuance. 5. The new alleyway is required to meet the minimum Fire Department turning radius. Plan Review -Water 1. This project is within the CD zone, therefore the Water System Development Charge (SDC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.213 x the square footage of the site. Total fees for water is $15,053.78 at 70,675 sq. feet. 10,500 square feet of the existing site was previously paid in 1980. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for all existing water connections. 2. Preliminary fire flow is 5,000 gpm. Applicant will need five hydrants to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structure and five additional shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. Applicant has not shown the locations of all hydrants. 3. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection, will be required to be retrofitted with a 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. Fire flow exceeding 2,500 gpm requires a looped system. A water main extension in Williams Ave S will be required to increase fire flow to serve this site as the existing 6-inch main is not adequate .. 5. A fire sprinkler system is required by the Fire Department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation the double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if backflow device is to be installed inside the building. 6. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on the domestic water meter. 7. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required ERCRPT.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department ~ MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CE~ REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21,2004 Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer Env.ntal Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-070, ECF, SA-H PageBofB 1. This project is within in the CD zone, therefore the Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.126 x the square footage of the site. Total fees for sewer is $8,905.05 at 70,675 sq. feet. 10,500 square feet of the existing site was previously paid in 1980. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for all existing sewer connections. 2. Food preparation facilities are proposed. A grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit will be required for installations inside the building. 3. Side sewers shall be 2% minimum slope. 4. Parking garages will require floor drains and floor drains shall be connected to the sanitary sewer through an approved oil/water separator located outside the building, wherever possible. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. Plan Review -Transportation 1. Improvements including reconstruction of city sidewalks, curb, gutter, paving, storm drainage and streetlights may be required during construction, including new curb cuts. 2. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. Plan Review -Storm Drainage 1. No Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC) are owed on this site. 2. Applicant has submitted a drainage report and drainage plans for review. Preliminary review shows that applicant has addressed the core and special requirements per the 1990 KCSWM. The TIR demonstrates that detention and water quality are not required at this site. 3. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project.. Plan Review -General 1. Separate permits for side sewers, water meters, landscape irrigation meter and any backflow devices will be required. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. 3. All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Proper drainage measures are required. The following note shall be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 5. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. 6. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 7. 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 8. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. ERCRPT.doc From: To: Date: Subject: Nick Afzali Gregg Zimmerman; Sandra Meyer 08/03/20044:20:51 PM Merrill Gardens @ Renton Center Traffic Mitigation Fee At our July 19th meeting with Neil Watts, Jennifer Henning, and the City Attorney office, we decided to develop a methodology to identify the traffic impacts associated with the subject project. These impacts should be only associated with the operations of existing deficient transportation facilities (projects). The following list is the existing deficient transportation projects/improvements (and the associated costs) that the proposed Merrill Gardens Development will contribute additional traffic to those projects. Project Improvements and Cost: Rainier Avenue Corridor Rainier Avenue (SW 7th -S 4th Place) Duvall Ave NE Widening SunseVDuvall Intersection Park/sunset Corridor Improvements Grady Way Corridor Improvements Park Avenue North Improvements (widening N 3rd and N 4th intersections) $ 6,450,000 $ 3,540,000 $ 2,950,000 $ 381,000 $ 3,215,000 $ 3,295,000 $3,000,000 In order to calculate the fair share cost of the proposed Merrill Gardens Development, the following formula was developed. Merrill Garden Traffic Mitigation Share: Merrill Garden 2006 ADT Volume x Project Improvement Cost (2002 ADT Arterial Volume) (% Increase to 2006) Using the above formula the fair share cost for each transportation project is described bellow. Rainier Avenue Corridor Traffic Mitigation Share Calculation: Out In (80) + (50) X $6.450.000 = $17,220 45,000 (1.082) Rainier Avenue (SW 7th -S 4th Place) Traffic Mitigation Share Calculation" Out In (60 + 40) X $3.590,000 = $7,370 45,000 (1.082) Duvall Avenue NE Widening Traffic Mitigation Share Calculation: Out In (10+10) X $2.950,000 = $3,470 15,700 (1.082) SunseVDuvall Intersection Out In {10 + 10} ~ ~381,000 = $200 34,800 (1.082) Park/Sunset Corridor Improvements: Out In {10 + 10} ~ ~3,215,000 = $2,500 23,000 (1.082) Grady Way Improvements: Out In {10 + 10} ~ ~3,295,000 = $1,700 35,000 (1.082) Park Avenue North: Out In {70 + 50} ~ ~31000,000 = $7,600 43,800 (1.082) Therefore: Total Traffic Mitigation Share Cost Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Nick = $40,060 CC: Bob Mahn; Jason Jordan; Jennifer Henning; Neil Watts • • , / ,'/ . < "'-, ,J',.,/ , / ' L ---_______ L_/ ,-( ", 'Y',' / / I}"'"" L ___ L___ __ _ ______ • """" " , ::::;:::T:~ j;--r--rr ,/ -«' ',>"<>-;-,7 /' ,'/ : , ......... f.1 1 1 , ---"_ v , , ___ , I ' ',-----''''-, , _____ -, . ' -G'-I, -' '. '.v /.~, , : --'I,-r 1 'f, , -(I ~:--j;VEL.,. N.",>, <~~L:'~--Tr,-q--!-T-H i i ! ! ! ! f-T W ---1 , t-1'"'~, .,< /"'" /"" / & / Iii ! !! ! en -L-LLLLLLL __ _ :, ' , I! '-'----" / :'-', "--" ~ / , , J'l ' 1 __ l _L __ " .______ _ _____ _ 1 -->'C'::>." j', '" ,/;" g ~ --f. \1F-S ----l----r .......---L-l:):::~J' // """<" ",",',/ ", '~').t~---------________ , -~-_v:_ ~____ --'A------- rrT --- T --" ' b:j ---7--/\ y / ~,," , _ ___ _ 1 ~ I I, , , 'I ' ,~,/ '" "",/ '~';./ --------------------::: : I COMMERC I AL , : 1: 1: M -'"" , / -'---1 r , ULT I : , , , , I l' I ~ / , " /'--->' /. / --, -M ---_ ---L----,---oo'o _"o_"oj , / -J--'7~, '---/ '/ ' ~./ i i CHURCH ! hMIL YL' i i J. j N::::::}r::-l--- r -----------L'-"---1 ~ '.( ''--> / , " L -------l : < , 1_-(1) /~---',/< \,/ / G/, --+1,-11-j-r !! CO!'ERCIAl k:IJ! CO""ERCjI AL ! -------j[~_=_ __ J L __ _ <'" /' "",' , " T I, :, :, ' , SINGLE FAMILY '! 1: i l J _______ L ______ _ '" \ ' / ", I " S~------------, , ' --·1 _ _ , , !! , _ _ ___ _ _ __. _______ , ,--- ---------------7:"',./ / 1-1 1 -LLLLLflf[--S A¥f. '-'---------r-----T-----r'1' l i ---------/----. ";>'----. ---/--"77'< ------ -----_____ ---1; i " i i !! " "7", " u ~ ---T---r---,---- -, : COMMERCIAL _ " " ' '----,' ,----------T -, --, , _ J __ ' , ,L-, .------, I T r : : , I ' , RET A I L " j 1 -----__ L_J::::::::, I- ' '" ~ 'I I I 'I "_____ _ ------1 I I / / ,/ Ii -' ~ i i SINGLE F AM III Y, , ; '''''''''r'''1'''----'[''----, ! i / , /;, :'0........ , , 1 1 1 ---LL_ ,-" : : ---I; I I:; ,/ / ,/ ii 15 ~---LL_ ------- ---!i SURF ACE PARK! NG! r-MUll TI 1 F AM I L Y 1 -1 _____ --1 L __ . / / / MULTI if l! ' SITE" : L ____________________________ _ ,/ , ---/ FAMILY II 8 ' if _ II-----K- r1 E---" S __ ,/ /,/ J L _____ J BP~ _ ----l1_y_ ~-J' ------,-r-y-----------i / ,,.:..---------; • -----------------'-SURFACE PARKI~9_::, ,------T ',,:,: ! ' I '-~ -----T ,__ ___ I I, TRANSIT ' / , f-------,;,,, ---T , , , COM"ER_ __----: _-,-" _ '" , ~ ,..----t ___ _ I I i I , ,/ "Il Y ! COMMERCIAL I i COMMERCIAL !! -.i---::-::--r--r ill PAR~ING ! ! ! CENTER! '" /1 / / 'ULT I FA ! VACANT L 1 __ .. ____ --1 J---:::'---r 1 i ! CO,,"ER_; i STRuFuRE ! il ! Ii~ / i / .L --..---f------T 1 ! J , -,! i i : '", " :J ~,' i / -.. ------------COMMERCIAL -~---r i 1 f-' i I I ;; ! '" 1':;!LJ ,~ ~-'L._ ----r--.. J SINGLE FAM! l Y , 'RET AIL, : , ---l------_-'--__ LL ____ , J~ / ' , ----=+-.. ,.-rr I" L to ¢ t~--.LJrl-~ S--" tIJ YI,' -/ '-----'---T~-T--l COMM_ f i ! S I NGLEL FAM! l1' .J-------- --11-,,1:; . '----'-------l-----------------/.rlr----l !: : : : COMM, 1-:: I L_ --------__ _ _ T -1 r ': , , ~$ I I ,-------1_ --1._ ------J j -_L ___ ---------, c___ -----_.,---1 _ , , , , I " ! , lit/ i : I--,--------------r---r---l--------r--r---T, :, iii ! , , Ii! L '-"-"r'''-''-''-''n: r"-"l i a: ---1----, I ", : , L' I I I -.l ---1. --' I / , -------, r--1----r i I :: " 'L : j' I L .. ..L .. ...L .. .....L.. .. • i I .-" " I I , , __ __ I ' I" :, ',-" ---!-----'M " '" "-, , "\ 0 r---li ! .L .L---i LLl. __ -.l N ighborhood Det8l1 ap , ___ ~ 'n, "_L __ " ~ e __ ---l...,.....-I Ir--,-ia: i " I I 1'-----I I I I I I I t-----I I I I I L ___ _ <C>- <C z3: " 200 400 o 50 100 j j ® " I! " I: T I' .-l , ,"" , I~ , , +1 , , ..... , ! , , , I , , , " , :..I:Ii , , I , I I , , ! ----I OO"'-""!IIWnIIII'O ,=..-: .,_ ,_u .... ,...., ::: '.-:: I I t', ! , " t , , , , , \ i , \ , " I ~ i ~: , , i , , -t' ! , , , , I .; , , • , ,--, , ! , , t , : I :,1--", , .. I ~ : I ' ,'\ , ; { : ri.! '/ \: I:"", i: ~ d l " iii " " }~ I' " ,: I:' {1': : I: ,; I; Ii :f Ii I; r ';' L , , , , O.IIuo::J U01UOll@SNlIffilVO llIID1IIW;;JJ ~ 8011611BIS PUB dB., Xl!uJOJA 'uBJd ellS I L.:.J ! ~ CD 05 g j II I J ~J"'~~. 9.111881 •• • jii I~ j 8 J IJ~ j: f II I J I I I ! J J~fi~ J i ! J I a! I J J f R f l~~L! il ~ I) ... ~.~ p ! ~ ~ ~I' • t== b . ..'-~. I-.. " ~In> .I .... r ~ , ! ! I ====================1 1 IM(P) Airport Way tf][ I;; iC·A; i IC' I ! -.; i: I! i oJ . -OA l lOA; i ISfTb ~inl 1St '--'--'---'-l....L..L..-'-L-LJ S 2nd St. G3 -19 T23N RSE E 112 ZONING P/BIPW TJ!CHNJCAL SBllV1C118 1210+/03 - - - -Renton dtty Llmttll 6 200 #0 F3 114800 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 5318 ~NING MAP sofK RESIDENTIAL ~ Resource CODservation ~ Residential dulac ~ Residential 5 dulac ~ Residential 8 dulac ~ Residential Manufactured 1.-10 I Residential 10 dulac I R-14J Residential 14 dulac Homes I RM-I I Residential Multi-Family IDlill MIXED USE CENTER ~ Center Neighborhood- ~ Cenler Suburban· IUC-NlI Urban Center -North PC-N21 Urban Center -North 2 ~ Cenler Downtown- [§!] Cenler Office Residential COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL W Industrial -Heavy o Industrial -Medium IT] Industrial -Ught (P) Publicly owned ___ Renten City UmitB ___ Adjacent City UmitB _ Book Pages B,oundary \RH-N\ Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center tRM-C l Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center ~ Commercial Arlerial· ~ Commercial Office· ~ Convenience Commercial KROLL PAGE PAGE# INDEX !RM-T I Residential Multi-Family Traditional tRH-U I Residential Multi-Family UrbaD Center* • May include Overlay Districts. See Appendix maps. For additional regulations in Overlay Districts, please see RMC 4-3. SECrfTOWNIRANGE To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning l\IIe~fihg Date(' ~T'm~sday, Septemb~i>2"f;2004 Time:::· .. 9:00AM ....... . Location) Sixth FlooFQ~nf~rence Room:#620· Agenda listed below. , Merrill Gardens at Renton Center (Jordan) LUA04-070, ECF, SA-H The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new 155-unit senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. Specifically, vehicular and pedestrian access is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South to the main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels is proposed from a 15-foot wide alley located east of the building. The applicant is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site in an adjoining lot. Project construction is planned to commence in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. Rainier A ve. Mixed Use -South Parking Lot (Fiala) LUA04-093, ECF, SA-A The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan review for the construction of 27 parking spaces within a surface lot associated with Chang's Mongolian Grill. The proposal includes portions of two large parcels containing Category 2 and 3 wetlands. The Category 3 wetland would be filled in to accommodate the parking lot with wetland compensation proposed off-site and include wetland creation, enhancement and buffer averaging. The proposal also involves the removal of noxious weeds; piping of an existing drainage ditch; installing a retaining wall; utility improvements; and a parking modification. Cingular Micro-Antennas -NE 1st Street (Fiala) LUA04-095, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the installation of a 3-sector antenna array with 2 antennas per sector (micro-facility) flush mounted to a de-energized Puget Sound Energy lattice tower located on a utility tract within the Liberty Ridge subdivision. The site is zoned Residential-10 (R-10) dulac. Associated equipment would be located behind a solid 6-ft. cedar fence with a landscaped buffer. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® , , ., , STAFF REPORT \ City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations BACKGROUND REPORT DATE Project Name Applicant File Number Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area CRITERIA: September 21, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC. C/O Friedman Development PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, W A 98040 LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Project Manager Jason E. Jordan The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Hearing Examiner Site Plan approval for the construction of a new market rate senior housing retirement complex located within the CD zoning designation. The four-story building is proposed to be approximately 193,960 square feet and will include 155 residential units with 92 under structure parking stalls and nine surface parking stalls. The structure is planned to contain two lower levels of parking, with the lowest level of parking to be approximately 6 feet below grade, while the second level of parking will comprise the first floor (above grade) of the building. Four residential levels are proposed to be located above the parking levels. 104 Burnett Avenue South All existing buildings will be removed with the exception of a 12,906 square foot commercial building 81,175 square feet (1.86 acres) Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf Total Building Area gsf 193,960 square feet 206,866 square feet 1. BUILDING SITING AND DESIGN i. Pedestrian Building Entries -Minimum Standards: Require buildings to be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the fa9ade facing the street. The main entry to the proposed senior housing complex faces Burnett Avenue South, while vehicular parking is located to the east off of a public alley from South Tobin Street. The applicant has highlighted the building entrance by creating an elevated porte-cochere or covered vehicular/pedestrian drop-off/pick- up area as an extension of the building's main entry feature. The proposed pedestrian walkways provide clear connections to the sidewalk from the building's main entrance. In addition, individual units at grade level along Burnett Avenue South are proposed to contain their own private entries onto Burnett Avenue South. Guidelines focus on providing clear architectural entrance features with lobbies, canopies and ornamental lighting. Also encouraged are pedestrian pathways, plazas and landscaping. Staff has worked with the applicant to provide a well-defined main entrance to the proposed facility. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. No additional guidelines are suggested. ii. Transition to Surrounding Development -Minimum Standards: Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. The following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: . , , City of Renton PIBIPW Department ~ MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CEJIf;;;' REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 u ter Design Overlay Regulations LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Page2of2 • Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger building and so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; • Building proportions, including step backs on upper levels; • Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller pieces; • Rooflines, pitches and shapes. The proposed development holds the street edge unlike current buildings, which have parking lots between them and the street edge. Staff had earlier suggested that the applicant consider stepping down the north end of the building to create a better transition between the remaining lower density single- family homes and this more urban development. The applicant has responded by stepping down the northern end of the four-story building from four .stories to two stories. In addition, the units fronting on Burnett Avenue South are proposed to be higher one-story attached dwellings with individual entries, entry gardens and masonry facades, which help transition the development to the surrounding residences. The proposed building is 4 stories over two levels of parking, with a maximum building height of approximately 62 feet. Breaking the building into two distinct buildings above the parking level reduces the overall bulk of the project. Levels 2 through 4 are also set back from the street and further modulated with recesses for decks. The bulk of the first level is modulated between alternate setbacks from the sidewalk of 6 to 13 feet and broken by the proposed porte-cochere. Although the proposed building would be taller than surrounding buildings to the south and west, the immediate area is zoned CD and likely to change as incremental redevelopment occurs. Comprehensive Plan policies encourage taller buildings and more intensive use of properties in the downtown core. The CD zoning allows for a 95-foot height limit. The proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. No additional guidelines are suggested. 2. PARKING, ACCESS, CIRCULATION i. Location of Parking -Minimum Standards: No parking shall be located between a building and front property line or street side of a corner lot ii. Design of Surface Parking -Minimum Standards: Parking lot lighting shall not spill onto adjacent of abutting properties. iii. Structure/Garage Parking -No minimum standard. Guidelines state that parking entries should not subordinate pedestrian entries and should not dominate the streetscape. Parking garages should be architecturally compatible with the residential portion of the building. The parking structure should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. Garage parking should be secure. The street side of parking garages in the CD zone should incorporate retail or service commercial facilities. There is no surface parking proposed, with the exception of a nine stall surface parking lot located behind the building. The majority of parking (92 stalls) is contained within the first two levels of the building. Entry to the parking garages is from a public alley off of South Tobin Street, located behind (east) the building. The alley-facing fayade of the garage is faced in split face concrete block, an attractive material that is compatible with the residential portion of the building. The nine-stall surface parking area is proposed to be landscaped at either end to screen the parking from the public right-of-way. The garage will be controlled with electronic entries. No parking is provided at grade level, between the front property line (adjacent to Burnett Avenue South) and the building. Staff had requested that parking at alley level, in the rear of the building be enclosed so as to lessen the impacts on adjacent properties as well as increase security for vehicles utilizing the parking facility. The applicant has responded by enclosing the parking within the building. As a result, the proposal complies with the minimum standards of this criterion. , r City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CEIV (RE REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21,2004 3. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION/COMMON SPACE u ter Design Overlay Regulations LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Page 3 0'3 i. Minimum Standard -Attached housing developments of 10 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. The common space area should be aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. The project consists of 155 dwelling units, which would require 7,750 square feet of common space. The proposal includes 12,711 square feet of common area, which exceeds the minimum amount necessary. The common areas include a 3,236 square foot library/media room on the first floor, a 1,200 square foot activity room and 5,560 square foot garden terrace on the second floor and a 2,715 square foot garden terrace on the fifth level. All of the common areas would be open and accessible to all residents. The courtyard areas would utilize landscape planters and trellises to create a separation between private outdoor areas of the first level units and the common courtyards. In addition, there are a number of other smaller linear landscaped areas along the perimeter of the building and around the porte-cochere, which also contains small landscaped features. The proposed common areas comply with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. 4. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN i. Building Character and Massing -Minimum Standard -All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40 feet. The proposed building utilizes a variety of modulation and articulation. At the street level the building is generally setback 6 to 13 feet from the property line with step backs of 2 feet at intervals no longer than 40 feet, with one exception on the east fayade of the proposed structure (adjacent to the alley). In order to comply with enclosing the second level of structured parking, the applicant elected to utilize a concrete wall, which is modulated at an interval of approximately 50 feet. As this was necessary to enclose the parking area and to provide the appropriate unit type mix, staff does not object to this exception. A variety of types of textured eMU will be used on the street front elevations. Walls along Burnett Avenue South are broken up with openings, which contain decorative screen material. In addition the porte-cochere near the center of the project softens the length of the building. Above the street level the building is modulated such that there are no elevations longer than 40 feet on the street sides on the Burnett Avenue South facade. As a result, the majority of the proposal complies with the minimum standard and guidelines of this criterion. ii. Building Rooflines -Minimum Standard -Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs, gables, prominent cornice or fascia, or be broken or articulated to add visual interest to the building. The applicant has provided a varied and creative roofline with a combination of hipped roofs, prominent cornices and a stepped roof plane at the north end of the building. The roof plan creates the appearance that the project is a city block made up of several different buildings. In addition, forms of hip roof of various sizes break up the sloped portions of the roof, which create an aesthetically pleasing building- scape. The proposal complies with this criterion. Building Materials -No Minimum Standard -Guidelines state that exterior finishes should add visual interest and detail and be made of material that is durable, high quality and easily maintained. iii. The base of the building is faced with durable materials mainly consisting of split-face concrete block. The upper portions of the building use "lighter" appearing materials, including vertical cementitious siding, batten and panel cementitious siding, horizontal clapboard style cementitious siding and decorative trellis and railings. The proposed building materials meet the guidelines of this criterion. , i City of Renton PIBIPW Department MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CE", I RE REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 Decision u, 'er Design Overlay Regulations LUA-04-010, SA-H, ECF Page 40'4 The Merrill Gardens at Renton Center, File No. LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF, is determined to comply with the minimum standards and guidelines of the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations, RMC 4-3-100 0, E, F & G. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: Neil Watts, Development Services Director TRANSMITTED this 21st day of September, 2004 to the applicant and owner: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC. C/O Friedman Development PO Box 1018 Mercer Island, W A 98040 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of September, 2004 to the owner: Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. 715 Lind Avenue SW Renton, W A 98055 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of September, 2004 to the contact: Steve Johnston Curtis Beattie & Associates 3131 Elliott Avenue #270 Seattle, WA 98121 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of September, 2004 to Parties of Record. Artice Slemko 1441 5 12'h SW Seattle, WA 98166 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of September, 2004 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Stan Englar, Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Development Services Director Jennifer Henning, Development Services Division Kayren Kittrick, Public Works Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal September 21,2004 date Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 5, 2004. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process /may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. , , / " . '" j-.. ,' ,/ l ' ''\.., v , " , J L ____________ , ,-( ", y,' / " "..... "---------------. ,-, -,. . . ___ L _____ ~ ---"----r---r--/ / '\" '" ,,' , " '--T--r-~ H , , ,/ ~' ") "" ",/ / / ' '. ~f1 ' , ,/ '/'::-'" "'/ , " IA ' ,,. ,. '\'-A ,. ,. __ __ ____ , : ' -~, -.' ~ " 'v /. ~ / , : --T--1"-T'---"1 " -[~~:-:~V.E.-",N-,,)/ <~~L-'!-T!-!-!-T-H I i I ! ! ! ~rk --. - 1 . ',' ~ ./'" .. / """ /~"" /.~ / ii' , "L ' en. L---L-L __ L_L __ LJ ___ L __ I', . , "C-"/ ··x ;>"'" "" / g'l ' l'L ' J L __ --5---' L________ ~ ___ _ -, , '-. -..l'" .. ,. "" ,. _ ___ _ _______________ ......--_L_L}.:-.:-.:-.:-~Y ,/ ." .. <.. "", / <~, ,L----------------¥l ~~. -'5, u~~____ -~~------T-TT----T 1 r "-1 --r---""., y / ~ ~} ""r--f'-lY:-r __ I, _ I I I ....., . ,c... ,/ "", "" / '~" ~ ~';./ -r----------------- --, _ , iZi C,"",Re I AL ! _ l' l' M -/ / ;;J",. A \,' / ''<---1--, , MULTI " . " ' , , 1 J' , ______ ~ I--- . .. -,. '-. ,. , ,. ------ -----------c, "', ________ , , r' 7 ), ">( "" / /' ~ / i i CHURCH I IF AM I L YLI i i -.l j N::::::)r::-l--- r ----------L'-"-1 ~ ~ .< /" > G " " t L ----------l :. , 1.(1) ... -Y-",-./'-\/ / .,!. ---+-1-'T,-r--r !! CO~"ERCIAL k:n. COM"ERCjIAL I j[~-=~~J L __ <----/' " .. \ " , " T', " " " ' SINGLE FAMILY "1' i l 1 __ -__ -L ______________ _ ----" / '" I I " " S~-------------• /. -'" I" ----- ---_______ • r--------------------/-------/ / I-:LLLLL-LLVlf[--S AVE.., ·-'--------T-----r----T--T i i -----r----. --------.~----''"' _ _ _ __ _ 'i ',_ I I : I / --7-------_ / ..,., --- ---------r---,---- -i , CO'",Re: AL, " i, / , -z-, r-------: '---T T T T, ' i ' , RET A I L ill L ______ L:J::::::::~ r"-' / ,'" ~"" Y' I ,,_ ________ _ _________ 1 " ,.. / ii ~ """" i I SINGLE FAUll , , i ''''''''1''''1''-----'1' , i: ,. • "" < ....... , , 1 1 1 1 j L____ " 'I, I " ,./ / ,./ !! g /:Q---LL_ ------ ------ ----t SURF,CE PARKING i !MullTIjFAMILYl L ____ J l ___ . / / ,. ""LT I Ii " ' 81 TE" i , _________________________ _ ,./ • ./ FAUILY l! 8 ' Ii r-----K-rTE---" S " ____ _ ,/ / / J L ____ J 8 ----l1_v..~,. _____ -,-r------------i / /---------'. -----'-SURFACE PARKI_~Ji.----:" r-------T 1,,' ; " i '-r-L ----T---'_-___ 1 i , " ANS IT I / / f-------,;,;, ----T -, , c,"",R.1 _-------_-.,-I, _ '" TR I 1"----, '----- , , , , , , , • / "TL Y ! COMMERC lAL i I COMMERCl AL " -L---:->r--T i i ! PAR~ I NG ! ! 'CENTER /! Ii ./ / ""LT I FA 'VACANT L 1 ---....j 1..---::-:---r--1 i 1 COOMER. I i STRUiTURE I 11 ! iJ~ / i / L ----------r-------~-1 ! J 'I .! ii, ',I, " /!I 0:,' ! /---------~ ---C,"MERCIAL ___ --or i i f--Ji Iii I ! '" Jt:$LJ ..-r---c..., -,--,----.J SINGLE F" I LV , 'RETA TL, " -L-------.L.-L..L.---_IJ~ I / , ~~-T-rT r, to ~ t~--.L -~ "S----" ~!II; .L.1-r--·-l-·-r---'''-r-·1 COMM.! ! , SINGLEL FAMlIL1Y _L_--L -------f..__ • r -L------T---------------r~lr---l ,', , , . cOMM· 1, "1 J ------ -_ --r--1 r , , ':>" 0: I , ---L 1 I 1 1 'L ___ ---------__ 1 --- . i, , I,..§! " i , ___ _ -----------1 ---------------, -~ _ , , " _ i i " ,...,.., 'ii I- ,-------------------r I , " " . , " 'i , 1(,)0: L .. _ .. , , c-----r---T-1 -1 1 I --, , , , i L~~-----71 I I I ,.". r-------, r-- 1 --- T --,--------l, i I", 'L'! J'I 'L 'L..l.. .. -L .. ..J. .. ..J. .. -1.: i, .', ....... "", " '_.... , .. I II." " --1.._._. , " 0' "I "-, -'I Mag \ r-"-"li L ·, : l. .. _ .. -J/--!.LL_..J Ne'ghborhood Delal ,._ ' ..., '1----~-, ~ I -----1-; ....... I I, '0:' ~.--, , , , , , , t-._-, , i i 10. ___ • -<>-< 23= --- • 200 400 o 50 100 D l~~ ~ J @l , . , ~ I' .-l I I I I I ...,:. I I I I I I I •• • " is Ii · .111-1 ~ -~II ~:=::~ I·=,,,: 'llur.J UOjuOll@SNHmIVO llIID1t1W4lli I ~ I .: :: . : ::: :;;: ',':: I SUO!l08S pU8 SUOJI8A8S DUIPIPIS I ,.....I iJ } I-- 'F=' == ,,.L .. II L.. l-II .:=., ~ .. ' i'" ~ h~ i '~II , i I I ====================1 1 .. ~~------------- IM(P) Airport Way \!J! I I !IOAI! IS I -0 A ! idA' i! ::=FFF~~~ !·STl'J1jo: tJ1' ni is't! i : I 11 ~ J..I{ ! ! ~ S 2nd St. G3 .. 19 T23N R5E E 1/2 ~ ZONING ~ ~ TlCBNlCAL SBllVlC1!8 __ - -_ton Ott, LImi'" -~~i~ ~.~.~-.:: ~c· =.::: I-~::·:: .. ___ i. ___ ....... CD CD B . . ..... _ ..... " ••••• _. • ... __ ........ m ......... -••••••• ""'."-"T'Y' ..... __ .•• • ..... -........ -•.•. ~" ""'" i! .. _...... -"'i \ 6 200 #/0 F3 1:4800 18 T23N R.5E E DATE: TO: FROM: • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM September 17, 2004 Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner Jason Jordan, Senior Planner (x7219) - SUBJECT: Trash & Recycle Room Modification Request - Merrill Gardens, File No. LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Summary of Request The applicant, Merrill Gardens Renton JVP, LLC, has requested a modification from Renton Municipal Code Section 4-4-0900 (Multi-Family Deposit and Collection Area Regulations) in order to provide less than the minimum Trash & Recycle area required. The subject site is proposed to contain a 155-unit senior housing complex. The proposed senior housing complex triggers environmental SEPA review and a Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval as well as this modification. As a result of the proposal, the applicant has depicted a 380 square foot trash and recycling room, within the ground floor level of the proposing building (parking and mechanical room area). The room is located adjacent to the public alley and is accessible from the alleyway, which is located on the east side of the proposed structure. City code requires that all multi-family projects provide a minimum of 1.5 square feet of recycling area and 3.0 square feet of trash collection area per unit. This would required 233 square feet of recycling area (1.5 x 155 = 232.5) and 465 square feet (3.0 x 155 = 465) of trash collection area for a total room area size of 698 square feet (233 + 465 = 698). However, the applicant is only proposing to provide 380 square feet of combined trash and recycling area. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a Trash & Recycling area reduction of 318 square feet. Section 4-4-080Fd allows the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to grant modifications from the parking standards for individual cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-25002): a. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; and b. Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and c. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; and d. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and e. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. Background The subject proposal would result in the construction of new 155-unit senior housing complex that would total approximately 193,960 square feet. The facility would be comprised of a four-story building, with two lower levels of parking. The property is located in the Center Downtown (CD) zone and is adjacent to the former McLendon's hardware store. The site is currently developed H:\Oivision.s\Oevelop.ser\Oev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\04-070.Jason\trashmod.doc :, • • with a parking area, a 5,580 square foot concrete building and three large open air sheds, which served the hardware store. Section 4-4-090D of the Trash and Recycling standards regulations require the provision of a specified square footage of trash and recycling area per unit of each multi-family complex. Based on the applicant's analysis, the retirement complex will contain 155 apartment-type units, which requires 1.5 square feet of recycling area and 3.0 square feet of trash collection area per unit. Therefore, the total square footage of trash and recycling area collection required is 698 square feet. The following table also depicts the above-mentioned trash and recycling area requirements: # Of Units Type of Area Required Area Provided Area 155 1.5 square feet (RecvclinQ) 232.5 N/A 155 3.0 square feet (Trash 465 N/A Collection) Total 698 380 Because the proposed recycling and trash collection area is 318 square feet less than the minimum square footage required, the applicant has included a modification request with the site plan application. The approval of the Trash and Recycling Area modification will be required as a condition of approval for the proposed site plan. In the event the modification request is not approved, the applicant would be required to comply with the trash and recycling area regulations by either modifying the site plan, or by establishing alternative arrangements (e.g., off-site or shared agreements). In addition, the satisfaction of this requirement would be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits. Analysis 1.) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment. The applicant's project design team submitted a narrative statement that argued senior housing residents, generally produce less trash than other multi-family dwellings. In addition, the project architects designed the trash and recycling room to be enclosed within the building near the main kitchen facilities and adjacent to an outside wall abutting the public alleyway. This location provides easy access to individuals depositing trash and recyclable products as well as collecting the deposited material. The code's square footage trash and recycling requirements are intended to eliminate over-filled dumpsters and rooms housing trash collection, which could ultimately impact neighboring properties. However, in this case, staff does not expect the maximum level of trash to be generated from the proposed use. In addition, the trash and recycling areas will be located completely within the building, thus limiting impacts to surrounding properties. Therefore, the requested modification conforms to the intent and purpose of the trash and recycling regulations by providing sufficient internal area within the site. The proposal, as depicted on the site plan, appears to meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by code requirements, based upon sound judgment. 2.) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity. The proposed trash and recycling area satisfies code requirements for location and access. Based on the applicant's modification justification, the site would provide adequate trash and recycling area, as the senior housing complex is not expected to generate maximum levels of garbage, typically generated in a multi-family setting. As the H:\Oivision.s\Oevelop.ser\Oev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\04-070.Jason\trashmod.doc -J • • trash collection room is proposed to be located within the building, staff does not anticipate this proposal to be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. 3.) Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code. See discussion under criteria number 1) above. 4.) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. As indicated in the applicant's justification, the proposed 380 square foot trash and recycling area room would rarely be maximized as the retirement residence is not expected to provide as much trash collection as a typical multi-family complex. Therefore, the proposed 380 square foot room is justified for the proposed use and situation at this project site. 5.) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. As stated under criteria number 2) above, the proposed trash and recycling collection room would not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity as the room is proposed to be located entirely within the building. Recommendation The proposed senior housing complex use is not expected to generate maximum demand on trash and recycling collection, typically associated with other multi-family developments. According to Trash and Recycling code requirements (RMC 4-4-0900) for multi-family facilities, the proposal would need to provide 318 additional square feet of trash and recycling area. However, based on the justification provided by the applicant, staff recognizes that the proposed use will generate less trash than typically associated with other multi-family developments and that the proposed collection area will be entirely located within the building, thus not creating any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and/or uses. Decision The Trash and Recycling modification for the Merrill Gardens at Renton Center is approved subject to the approval of Site Plan Review Application LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF. Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.07S(3); WAC 197-11-680). APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on October 1, 2004. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. cc: Neil Watts Yellow File H:\Oivision.s\Oevelop.ser\Oev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\04-070.Jason\trashmod.doc From: To: Date: Subject: Dear Jason, "Kramer, Stephenie (CTED)" <StephenieK@CTED.WA.GOV> "'jjordan @ci.renton.wa.us'" <jjordan @ci.renton.wa.us> 09/14/2004 2:25:31 PM Merrill Gardens Based upon our phone conversation, and the letter you faxed to me from Northwest Archaeological Associates, I concur that further archaeological work is appropriate, and I understand that this work will require backhoe trenches which will substantially disrupt normal business activities at McClendon Hardware. I would concur that the archaeological work could be completed at a later time, prior to building permit issuance but after SEPA determination. I would recommend an MDNS be issued with the following language: The applicant shall conduct and complete an archaeological assessment for the project area prior to permit issuance. The archaeological assessment, including conclusions and recommendations, shall be forwarded to OAHP and the affected Tribes for comment. If archaeological resources are identified during the assessment and cannot be avoided, mitigation measures will be developed and commenced in consultation with the City, OAHP, and the affected Tribes, in conformance with RCW 27.53, RCW 27.44 and WAC 25-48, prior to building permit issuance. Thanks, Jason, let me know if this won't work. Stephenie Stephenie Kramer Assistant State Archaeologist Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation PO Box 48343 1063 S. Capitol Way, Ste. 106 Olympia, W A 98504-8343 voice (360) 586-3083 fax (360) 586-3067 www.oahp.wa.gov PC!g~ 1 I TO: Phone: CilV 01 RenlOn Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, 6th FI r Renton, WA 98055 Stephenie Kramer Office Of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (360)586-3083 Fax Phone: (360) 586-3067 Date: 9/9/04 FROM: Jason Jordan City of Renton Phone: (425) 430-7219 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 I SUBJECT: Merrill Gardens Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 REMARKS: D Original to D Urgent D Reply D Please ~ For your be mailed ASAP Comment review Per our telephone conversation today, I am attaching the 8/10/04 Northwest Archaeological Associates letter for your review. The applicant would like to proceed with the environmental (SEPA) and land use process prior to completing the archeological assessment. Upon your review, if you agree to allow the applicant to proceed and conduct the assessment prior to building permit issuance but after the SEPA threshold determination is issued, any suggested SEPA conditional language would be greatly appreciated. I have informed the applicant that your office would be responding to this request sometime next week. Please do not hesitate to call me at (425) 430- 7219 should you have any additional comments or questions. Regards, Jason J~Jor-thwe,s-t A~ogical Associates, Inc. Cultural Resources Management Services 5418 20th Avenue NW, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98107 August 10,2004 Mr. Steven M. Friedman Friedman Development 7426 SE 2Th Street, Suite 200 Mercer Island, WA 98040-1018 RE Progress of the Archaeological Assessment for Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Dear Mr. Friedman, I am writing to apprise you of the status of the archaeological assessment for the proposed Merrill Gardens development project. On Saturday, August 6, 2004, I visited the project area and was able to excavate nine exploratory shovel probes along the western edge of the property to gauge the thickness of the fill and to determine the potential for intact buried surfaces. There has been some disturbance associated with McClendon's Hardware, but the sediments exposed in the shovel probes indicate the project site retains potential to harbor archaeological materials and the project will require more thorough assessment with a backhoe. Furthermore, although no sites are known to be on the property now, the project is in a sensitive archaeological area with archaeological sites recorded a block to the west. McClendon's Hardware is still operating on the project site and will not be moving to their new site until fall of this year. Since most of the project area is covered by the store parking lot and the lumber shed, the use of the backhoe to complete the archaeological assessment would substantially disrupt business operations. In light of this, I recommend that the archaeological assessment be postponed until McClendon's has moved to their new location. To summarize, the archaeological studies for Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre are still in progress and further assessment will proceed in consultation with the Muckleshoot and Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation after McClendon's Hardware vacates the location. Sincerely, Charles M. Hodges Senior ArchaeologisUGeoarchaeologist Tel: (206) 781-1909 Fax: (206) 781-0154 Email: cmhodges@northwestarch.com Rug 30 04 11:31a TO: FAX#: curtis beattie 206-282-4799 CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCIDTECTS 3131 ELLIOTI AVENUE. SUITE 270, SEATILE, WA98121 FAX TRANS MITT AL DATE: 8 . 70 • 04- cc:· 2E"UC;; F/V .. et>nt4?J FAX#: (206) 282-4799 FAX#: . ?" 3> 2· G ..",-,0 # OF PAGES: ~ (INCLUDING COVER) DESCRIPTION: MEMO: ___ ----=:~..::..\A_>_'?~O_'_"M~t __ P'E~ ..... R..~_'1+>l&~lf2......-;..-..... C=c),L;N~U .... fi12~-.e."..d'-I-71:..o? .... O .... A->:..L...( __ W [7ft C t:-.ff¥iLt i;'" (-to Dfe.:; tf)P At '0 Ih4 , 7b e-E:.T Oc u? p. 1 THtr 'Pu.s~. rt§4AN6-~IJ,LEb? ~~ IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE NUlVIBER OF PAGES INDICATED IN THE SPACE ABOVE, PLEASE CALL US AT (206) 282-8512. THANK YOU. Au~ 30 04 11:31a curtis beattie 206-282-4799 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None required. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Cedar River with its riverwaJk system is 2 blocks away, as is the Renton Senior Center. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Common outdoor open space as well as common indoor amenity areas are provided on site. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. IVe there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. See attached. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: See attached. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is bordered by Burnett S1, on the west, Tobin St. on the north, the alley on the east turning to Williams St., and a mid. block portion of the site abuts Williams St. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The downtown transit hub is located 1 block south on Burnett St. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The Project will have 92 parking stalls in the structure and 9 temporary stalls off the alley extension to Williams St. Approximately 20 undesignated parking stalls will be eliminated. 9 p.2 Au~ 30 04 11:32a curtis beattie 206-282-4799 Attachment to Environmental Checklist Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Section B, Environmental Elements 13. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION B.h. To date, there is no evidence of archaeological sites on the proposed Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre but areas of archaeological significance have been found within one quarter to one half mile of the project area. The presence of recorded archaeological sites nearby, and the proximity to the Cedar River indicates the proposed Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre may have potential to harbor significant archaeological material. NW AA has completed the archival research and has begun the assessment for the proposed development, but completing the archaeological assessment will require the use of a backhoe. Since McClendon's Hardware still occupies the proposed development site, the NW AA has recommended that the archaeological assessment be completed after the McClendon's has vacated the lot. NW AA shall then complete the field reco!ll1aissance and produce a technical report describing the methods used to conduct the field research. The report will also present the results of the archival research and the fieldwork as well as make recommendations for appropriate management practices with respect to cultural resources. 13.c. NW AA will coordinate wit the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and the Tribe shall have the option of sending a tribal monitor to the project site during fieldwork. p.3 CURTIS BE A Ttl E & ASS 0 C I ATE S ,PLANNING DE\I~~~~~ENiON July 22, 2004 Mr. Jason Jordan Development Services Division Planning/Building/Pub lie Works Renton City Hall 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Re: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Dear Jason: Architects 3131 Elliott Ave. Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 282-8512 Fax (206) 282-4799 This letter is written in response to your request for additional detail on our compliance with the Urban Center Design Guidelines for building massing. As noted, in our submitted Statement of Compliance in addition to the proposed modulation and articulation, the building is broken into two distinct building elements connected by a "bridge". The desired 40-foot maximum modulation was adhered to on the residential fayade, with only one exception onthe east elevation where due to the program for the unit mix we have one fayade segment that is about 50 feet. In the context of the full 550- foot fayade, it will certainly not look out of place. The groun,d floor fayade of the residential "town houses" also adheres to the modulation . requirements with only one exception, where a 50-foot segment is used due to program requirements. The fayade of the common area aligns with the back of the widened sidewalk and entry arcade and is not modulated in an effort to relate strongly to the typical downtown commercial frontage. Similarly, the alley fayade and south interior property line fayade are not modulated due to functionality and usability of the space. I hope that this clarifies this issue. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, LTD., P.S. Steve Johnston /tsm cc: Mr. Steve Friedman Fitename: CBA Files!Projec:ts!)v1errili Gardensf,tordan G/-22-04,ioc MUCKLESHOOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM 39015 172nd Avenue S. E. • Auburn, Washington 98092-9763 Phone: (253) 939-3311 • FAX: (253) 876-3312 July 20, 2004 Jason Jordan Senior Planner, City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Merrill Gardens (LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF) Dear Mr. Jordan: On behalf of the Cultural Resources Committee, I have reviewed the information sent on 06/30/04 regarding the Merrill Gardens Project and have the following comments. The 104 Burnett Avenue property is in an area the Tribe has flagged as high potential for archaeological discovery. Information ~garding previous surveys and recorded archaeological sites is available from the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, in Olympia. Due to the project's ground disturbing activities and the potential for archaeological discovery, we agree that an archaeological assessment of the project area is needed. In addition, we request the following: l. To review the archaeological survey's scope of work 2. The option of sending a tribal monitor during the field survey 3. To review the draft survey for completeness and accuracy ·4. A Recovery Plan in place in the event that human remains or artifacts are uncovered The Cultural Resources Program does not represent the Wildlife Program and the Fisheries Program which are separate departments under the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Please contact these departments for their input on this project. We appreciate the effort to coordinate with the Muckleshoot Tribe prior to site . preparation. The destructive nature of construction excavation can often destroy a site and cause delays and unnecessary expense for the contractor. If you have any questions, please contact me at 253-876-3272. Thank you for keeping the Tribe informed. Sincerely, ~efAo~· Laura Murphy, .Tribal Ar~haeolo~ist .. ' ,!::~ ~,~'.~. CC: Donna Hogerhuis, Cultural"Specialist Melissa Calvert, Wildlife & Culture Director 't,!:" ! ;. oL' Stephenie Kramer, Assistant -State Archaeologist, OAHP ,"\" CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: July 15, 2004 TO: Jason Jordan FROM: Rebe~~ STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson SUBJECT: Merrill Gardens Retirement Center, LUA-04-070 SA-H, ECF Staff reviewed this proposal as a preliminary application and commented on it on March 24,2004 (see attachment). At that time staff recommended supporting the preliminary proposal for a senior housing project of 140 to 150 units on the west side of the block between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South behind the former McLendon's Hardware site. Staff at that time had reviewed the subject proposal in terms of its compliance with the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines and found the project in general compliance. The following is based upon the applicant's drawings dated June 10,2004. A. Building Siting and Design In terms of building massing the building is perceived as two elements, one north and the other south, siting on a one-story high masonry base. In addition the building has a hipped roof for most of the building and open space terraces elsewhere. Whereas the one-story base is clad in masonry the upper stories are clad in a variety of materials including beveled siding, clapboard, and board and batten siding. Presumably, these surfaces will also be painted different colors to further break up the building'S massing. Pseudo balconies (metal railings) have been placed on certain bays to further add interest in the buildings exterior 1. Pedestrian Building Entries This standard requires buildings to be oriented to the street with the primary building entrance prominently located on the far;ade facing the street. The applicant was asked to look at ways of highlighting the building entrance· fronting on Burnett Avenue S and has responded by creating an elevated "porte cochere" or covered vehicular drop-offlpick-up area as an extension of the building's main entry. In addition individual units at grade level along Burnett Avenue South will have their own private entries. 2. Transition to Surrounding Development Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk, and scale. Merrill Gardens Retirement Cewer, LUA-04-070 SA-H, ECF 2 07115/2004 Staff had earlier suggested that the applicant consider stepping down the north end of the building to create a better transition between the remaining lower density single-family homes and this more urban development. The applicant has responded by stepping down the northern end of the four-story building from four stories to two stories. In addition the units fronting 0 n Burnett A venue Swill be higher 0 ne-story attached dwellings with individual entries, entry gardens, and masonry fayades. B. Parking, Access and Circulation 1. Location of Parking No parking shall be located between a building and the front property line or the street side yard or a corner lot. No parking is provided at grade between the front property line and the building. In terms of the handling of off-street parking at-grade staff had requested that parking at alley level at the rear of the building be enclosed so as to lessen impacts on adjacent properties as well as increase security for vehicles parked here. The applicant has responded by enclosing this parking within the building. 2. Design of Surface Parking Parking lot lighting shall not spill onto adjacent or abutting properties. The applicant will have to take care to ensure that any at-grade parking area lighting not spill on to adjacent or abutting properties. Similarly, any interior parking garage lighting should be screening at the source so a,s not to spill onto adjacent or abutting properties. 3. Structures/Garage Parking Parking garage entries should be designed and sited to complement, but not subordinate the pedestrian entry. If possible locate the parking entry away from the street, to either the side or the rear of the building. The entry to the two-level parking garage is located at the north end of the building with access from South Tobin Street and the existing alley. The majority of the applicant's off-street parking will be contained in this two-level enclosed garage. The design of structured parking at finished grade under a building should minimize apparent width of the garage entries. The garage entries are recessed slightly from the alley and appear to be relatively low key and are not prominent or overpowering to the streetscape. Parking within the building should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trelliswork with landscaping. The parking garage is fully enclosed with one-story residential units between it and Burnett Avenue South. On the rear alley side the upper street level portion is also fully enclosed with a concrete masonry wall. No openings other than the garage entrance face onto the alley. H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Development Review\Green File\Comments\Merrill Gardens Retirement Center.doc\cor Merrill Gardens Retirement CeilLer, LUA-04-070 SA-H, ECF 3 07/15/2004 The street side of parking garages should incorporate one of the following uses in street-facing far;ades: Retail or service commercial uses in the Center Downtown (CD) Zone. At the south end 0 f t he site the applicant has employed entrance lobby and common interior residential open, etc. at street level along Burnett Avenue South. Further north along Burnett Avenue S the applicant has employed one-story residential units with entry gardens between the garage and street. The result is that the garage will not be apparent from either Burnett Avenue S or South Tobin Street on the north. 4. Vehicular Access Parking garages should be accessed from side streets. Driveways should be located to be visible from the right-ofway and not impede pedestrian circulation. Minimize the number of driveways and curb cuts. The main two-level parking garage is accessed off the alley at the rear of the building just south of S. Tobin Street. As a result it is not readily visible from either Tobin or Burnett. The applicant has also provided an off-street drop-off and pick-up area at the main lobby entrance. That has two curb cuts. Staff supports this configuration since it should reduce traffic impacts on Burnett Avenue South. Typically retirement centers generate a lot of drop-off/pick-up traffic and often have their own mini-buses for taking residents to off-site events. This configuration should reduce loading on Burnett Avenue S and make it more free flowing. 5. Pedestrian Circulation Developments should include an integrated pedestrian circulation system that connects buildings, open space, and parking areas with the adjacent street sidewalk system. Pedestrian pathways should be delineated separate from vehicle circulation by using a variation in paved texture and color and/or landscaping. This urban site has an existing sidewalk along both Burnett Avenue S and South Tobin Street, which will remain. Pedestrians will also be able to walk around the vehicular drop-off/pick-up zone along a walkway on its perimeter. C. Landscaping 1 Recreation / Common Open Space 1. Common Open Space Attached housing development of 1 0 or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common open space or recreation area equal to 50 square feet per unit. The common space area should be aggregated to provide usable areas for residents. The applicant has proposed two exterior common open spaces in addition to their interior common areas. These include a 5,560 square foot terrace area on the second floor and a 2,715 square foot roof terrace accessed from the north end of the fifth floor. These areas are proposed to be landscaped and have outdoor seating. In addition to this the applicant notes that the retirement center will have over 4,400 square feet of interior common open space for residents. As a result the amount of common open space provided slightly exceeds the 8,150 square feet required for the proposed 163 assisted living units. The interior common open space is above and beyond this. D. Building Architectural Design .L Building Character and Massing All buildingfar;ades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than 40 H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Development Review\Green File\Comments\Merrill Gardens Retirement Center.doc\cor Merrill Gardens Retirement C~er, LUA-04-070 SA-H, ECF 07115/2004 feet and no less than 4 feet and shall have a minimum depth of 2 feet. Articulation, modulation, and their intervals should create a sense of scale important to residential buildings. 4 In terms of building design the retirement center appears to be well articulated with vertical modulation usually every 40' or less. Staff notes that there are a couple of incidences where the vertical modulation exceeds 40 feet. One of these is the backside of the northern building in its southeast comer (in plan view). Here the un-modulated portion of the wall appears to be 52 feet long. Similarly, in the southern building there are a couple of areas where the un- modulated portion of the wall is 41 feet rather than the recommended 40 feet. Whereas staff would recommend overlooking the 41 feet versus required 40 feet modulation standard, the applicant will have to address that portion of the building were the un-modulated portion of the wall is 52 feet wide. 2. Building Rooflines Building rooflines should be varied by emphasizing dormers, chimneys, stepped roofs, . gables, prominent cornice or fascia, or a broken or articulated roofline. The applicants have provided a varied and interesting roofline with a combination of hipped roofs, prominent cornices, and a stepped roof plane at the north end of the building. When seen from above the roof plane wi11look integral with the rest of the building rather than as some form of decorative applique. 3. Building Materials Building_exterior finishes should add visual interest and detail and be made of durable, or high quality, easily maintained materials. Materials that have an attractive texture, pattern, or quality of detailing are encouraged. The proposed exterior of the building includes brick masonry along the Burnett Avenue S fayade at street level as well as the south facing end wall of the building. Above the first floor residentiallbuilding services level different siding materials are used including vertical cementitious siding, batten and panel cementitious siding, horizontal clapboard style cementitious siding. In addition, a decorative trellis' and decorative railings are provided. This should help ensure a varied and interesting fayade, rich in different colors and textures. Recommendation: Support t his application noting that the subject proposal is in substantial compliance with the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines and with some minor adjustments can easily come into full compliance 0 r n ear full compliance. T he applicant should provide a proposed exterior material and color sample board for staff review before the issuance of building permits. Attachment cc: Don Erickson H:\EDNSP\InterdepartmentaI\Development Review\Grcen File\Comments\Merrill Gardens Retirement Center.doc\cor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor CITY. RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator July 14, 2004 Steve Johnston Curtis Beattie & Associates 3131 Ellitt Avenue #270 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Merrill Gardens LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Johnston: Per our telephone conversations, the Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application will be required to be placed "on- hold" pending the completion of the archeological assessment for the subject site 'and review by the State Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation. .' . Once the new information is submitted and approved by the state, I will reschedule your Environmental Review Committee (ERC) m~eting date and public hearing with the City's Hearing Examiner. Please note, theERC meeting will be scheduled as soon as possible, pending the completion and acceptance by the State of the resource survey. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions . . Sincerely; cc: Tennessee GroupLLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. fOwner Merrill Gardens Henton JVP LLC fApplicant ------}-O-SS-So-u-th-G-r-a-dy-W,-ay-.--R-e-nt-o-n,-w,-a-sh-i-ng-t-on-9S-0-S-s------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND,STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: July 14, 2004 TO: Jason Jordan ~~ Rebecca Lind FROM: STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson SUBJECT: Merrill Gardens Retirement Ceriter, LUA-04-070 SA-H, ECF Staff reviewed this proposal asa preliminary application and commented on it on March 24, 2004 (see attachment). At that time staff recommended supporting the preliminary proposal for a senior housing project of 140 to 150 units on the west side of the block between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South behind the former McLendon's Hardware site. Staff at that time had reviewed the subject proposal in terms of its conipliance with the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines and found the project in general compliance. The applicant was asked to look at ways of highlighting the building entrance fronting on Burnett Avenue Sand have responded by creating an elevated "porte cochere" or covered vehicular drop-off/pick-up area as an extension ofthe building's main entry. In terms of building massing the building is perceived as two elements, one north and the other south, siting on a one-story high masonry base. In addition the building has a hipped roof for most of the building and open space terraces elsewhere. Whereas the one-story base is clad in masonry the upper stories are clad in a variety of materials including beveled siding, clapboard, and board and batten siding. Presumably, these surfaces will also be painted different colors to further break up the building's massing. Pseudo balconies (metal railings) have been placed on certain bays to further add interest in the buildings exterior. Staff had earlier suggested that the applicant consider stepping down the north end of the building to create a better transition between the remaining lower density single-family homes and this more urban development. The applicant has responded by stepping down the northern end of the four-story building from four stories to two stories. In addition the units fronting on Burnett Avenue S will be higher one-story attached dwellings with individual entries, entry gardens, and masonry fayades. In terms of the handling of off-street parking staff had requested that parking at alley level at the rear of the building be enclosed so as to lessen impaCts'on adjacent properties as well as increase security for vehicles parked here. The applicant has responded by enclosing this parking within the building. In terms of building design the retirement center appears to be well articulated with vertical modulation usually every 40' or less. Staff notes that there are a couple of incidences where the vertical modulation exceeds 40 feet. One of these is the backside of the northern building in its southeast comer (in plan view). Here the un-modulated portion of the wall appears to be 52 feet long. Similarly, in the southern building there are a couple of areas where the un-modulated portion of the wall is 41 feet rather than the recommended 40 feet. Whereas staff would Merrill Gardens Retirement t.,,,,.!Cer, LUA-04-070 SA-H, ECF 2 07/14/2004 recommend overlooking the 41 feet versus required 40. feet modulation standard, the applicant will have to address that portion of the building were the un-modulated portion of the wall is 52 feet wide. Recommendation: Continue to support this application noting that the subject proposal is in substantial compliance with the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines and with some minor adjustments can easily come into full compliance or near full compliance. Attachment cc: Don Erickson H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Development Review\Green File\Comments\Merrill Gardens Retirement Center.doc\cor DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM July 14, 2004 Kayren Kittrick, Development Servich Nick Afzali, Transportation Systems ~ Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Traffic Impact Anal'ysi~ S4ated June .14,.2004) Transportation Systems Division staff have reviewed the subject Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and find it to be acceptable, except for the conclusion (noted in your July 2, 2004 memo transmitting the TIA) that the project requires no mitigation therefore does not trigger the traffic mitigation fee. Collection of this fee is required under Renton's adopted Concurrency Management System, which has been developed to address concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA) and City of Renton policies supporting concurrency. (Concurrency is defined as the situation where adequate public facilities must be in place when cumulative impacts of development occur, or within a specified time thereafter.) Renton's Concurrency Management System is based on the following: • A multi-modal citywide Transportation Plan adopted by the City of Renton, developed to mitigate the cumulative impacts of traffic generated by land use development over the next 20 years. • A City of Renton transportation Level of Service (LOS) standard, that differs from the traditional LOS for arterials. • Evaluation of the 20-Year Transportation Plan to adjustment of the Transportation Plan improvements as needed to meet the LOS standard. • Funding of the cost of the 20-Year Transportation Plan through a variety of fund sources including mitigation fees collected from developers as a condition of land use development within the City of Renton. The approval of development projects is, conditioned upon payment of the Traffic Mitigation Fee and any site-specific mitigation of on-site and/or adjacent facility impacts. This fee is established during the SEPA review process and paid during the project permitting process. • The City of Renton allocates the Traffic Mitigatipn Fee to any of the improvement elements of the citywide Transportation Plan in a manner that assures that concurrency between transportation LOS and land use development is met. • With payment of the Traffic Mitigation Fee, and any site-specific mitigation, development will have met City of Renton and GMA concurrency requirements. A Traffic Impact Analysis is prepared for proposed development projects to provide information for determining the amount of the Traffic Mitigation Fee, and to determine if any site-specific mitigation (i.e. roadway widening to provide separate right-tum or left-tum lanes, installation of traffic signals at street intersections) is required. '''"-Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre July 14,2004 Page 2 Also, noted below are several minor comments resulting from our review of the TIA. • A letter (dated June 14,2004), included in the TIA revises development density downward from 163 units to 155 units, with a corresponding reduction in trip generation. • Figure 2 -Suggest that turning radii for the horseshoe shaped driveway on Burnett Avenue South and for the parking garage access in the alley meet City of Renton or AASHTO guidelines. • Figure -Not clear in this figure or in the text whether the east/west connection between the alley and Williams Avenue South will operate as a one-way eastbound facility. • Page 5 -Revise "South Victoria Street" to either South 3rd Place or South 4th Place. • Page 6 -Burnett Avenue South in first paragraph of Street System is misspelled. Also, Burnett Avenue South in third paragraph should be Logan Avenue South. • Page 14 -Not clear from text how the 92 parking stalls are to be provided. Figure 2 shows only 55 parking stalls. Assume parking garage facility will have two levels. cc: Sandra Meyer Karl Hamilton Bob Mahn File H:ITRANSIPLNGIRLMIREVIEWSI2004 MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 13, 2004 Jason Jordan Jan Illian Abdoul Gafour MERRILL GARDENS SENIOR HOUSING, LUA 04-070, 104 Burnett Ave S. Water main improvements along Williams Avenue South will be required to provide adequate fire protection to the proposed development. Renton Fire Prevention Department has determined the preliminary fire flow demand for the development is 5,000 gallons per minute (gpm) including the use of a fire sprinkler system. A looped water main is required for buildings with fire flow over 2,500 gpm according to City code 4-5-070D-12.b. The existing 24-inch water main along Burnett Avenue South can provide about 5,500 gpm, however the existing water line along the east portion of the loop, in Williams A venue South, is only a 6-inch line and it cannot provide the required redundant flow to the looped water line. In order to provide the required redundant feed for reliability, the developer must install about 950 feet of new 12-inch line along Williams Avenue South from South 2nd St to South Tobin Street. The developer can request a latecomer's agreement to recuperate some of the costs of the water line from future development that will benefit from the new line. cc: Gregg Zimmerman Lys Hornsby Neil Watts Kayren Kittrick Corey Thomas C:\Documents and Settings\jjordan\Local Settings\Temp\merrill-gardens.071204.docl AG City of Re~ron Department of Planning / Building / Public WOrKs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~c....+lCVl5vcs COMMENTS DUE: JULY 14, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30, 2004 APPLICANT: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Merrill Gardens ~r. q",-/ "V); PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian S/ J( /JJ ~ 1."" SITE AREA: 81,175 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 193,960 square f;:fb~ ~.1 ~#lI '() -t..>a '!#1} LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue S WORK ORDER NO: 77273 ~h" SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct ~ 155-unit senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. Specifically, vehicular and pedestrian access is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South to the main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels is proposed from a 15-foot wide alley located east of the building. The applicant is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site in an adjoining lot. Project construction is planned to commence in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water UqhtlGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS t::: r <:5 t.L-O'-t..l 5'Pe..CfA-L We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propos j / . -Date 7 i _~/ ~_ City of Refl Department of Planning / Building / Public !Is ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JULY 14, 200 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30, 2004 APPLICANT: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Merrill Gardens SITE AREA: 81,175 s uare feet LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue S SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new 155-unit senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. SPElcifically, vehicula~ and pedestrian access is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South toth.e main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels is proposed from a 15-foot wide alley located east of the building. The applicant is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site in an adjoining lot. Project construction is planned to commence in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More EnvIronment MInor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment . Minor Major Information Imp!1cts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LiahtlGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infonnation is needed to properly assess this proposal. -_. ----Sigmuure ofDirectcir or Authorizoo Representative------Oa.te-- • • __ - -~-----l City of Reft Department of Planning / Building / Public a ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JULY 14, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30, 2004 APPLICANT: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Merrill Gardens PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 81,175 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 193,960 square feet LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue S I WORK ORDER NO: 77273 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new 155-unit senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. Specifically, vehicular and pedestrian access is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South to the main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels is proposed from a 15-foot wide alley located east of the building. The applicant is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site in an adjoining lot. Project construction is planned to commence in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LiQhtlGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ,/J ~ ~ Inv {~~-ltr?VJ~ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~ L ~ cV2A-/k).~~ /~/C4 I N2004 -PROPERTY S.ES FEE REVIEW o DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Jl ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET PLAN REVIEW}tOUTING SLIP Lt/4 -()~/)70 OTHER APPLICANT: ~~ JOB ADDRESS:n-~~ NATURE OF WORK: _ _;:?_~ RECEIVED FROM ----r...--,-~ WON ________ (date) GREENN _____ _ k o SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLmD SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES VESTED 0 NOT VESTED NEED MORE INFORMATION: o SQUARE FOOTAGE o FRONT FOOTAGE o o o o This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review # dated __ --==----=-:-=== o PARENT PIO# (subject to changeL LEGAL DESCRIPTION VICINITY MAP OTHER SUBJECT PROPER,TY PIO# ~~~' P'tv 7$~# 0 King Co. Tax Acct# (new) It is the intent of this develo=t~~YSI{to ~dfafe~~~er1.ffln-?e?~f' fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SOC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS Latecomer Aereement (pvt) WATER Latecomer Aereement (pvt) W ASTEW ATER Latecomer Ae:reement (pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/W A TER Special Assessment District/W ASTEW ATER Joint Use Agreement (METRO) Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones FUTURE OBLIGATIONS -~ $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION • I SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER N OF UNITS/ SQ. FTG, SDC FEE o Pd Prev, M Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Sine Ie family residential $1,525/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $1220/unit in park Apartment, Condo $915/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/sq, ft. of property (not less than $1525.00) X Boeing. by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM th ..... hold) , , SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWATER o Pd Prevo )X1 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SinJ;!le family residential dwellinJ;! unit $900/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $720/unit x Apartment, Condo $540/unit not in CD or COR zones x , ..¥<I Commercial/Industrial, $O,126/sq. ft. of property (not less than $900.00) X ~-1!d&!.D ~if~ tJ5"" REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New -Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees ., SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURF ACEW ATER o Pd Prev, 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ~ Never Pd SinJ;!le family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $715/unit x All other properties $0.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x -:3CO~ '\?'\ (not less than $715.00) /" ex.. ~ .L) .I f I PijEI)MINARY TOTAL $ I ~/L/I;I2;~k~ ?#Jf ~/~~~//J()S~~ re ~ Sign~~viewing Authority -, [{litE f/ I .-fA 'tit) ~, ~,~c;.--!1 ~ *If subject property is within an LID, it is developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. ~ I **~uare footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. g. EF~:~~j4~7' m~/pe~C.t;?14%'3;:;-$ ~~; , . DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM July 6,2004 Jason Jordan Jan lilian X7216 MERRILL GARDENS SENIOR HOUSING 104 -Burnett Ave S. LUA04-070 I have reviewed the application for Merrill Gardens Senior Housing to be located at 104 -Burnett Ave S. and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER SEWER STORM STREETS There is an existing 24-inch main in Burnett Ave S., a 24-inch main in Tobin Ave S., and a 6-inch main in Williams Ave S. The proposed project is located in the 196 water pressure zone and is outside the Aquifer Protection Zone. Static pressure in the area is approximately 70 psi. Derated fire flow available in Burnett Ave S. is 5,500 gpm. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Burnett Ave S., an 8-inch sewer main in Tobin Ave S. and an 8-inch sewer main in the alley in an easement. Relocation of the sewer main in the alley may be necessary. There are existing storm facilities in Burnett Ave S. There is sidewalk, curb and gutter fronting the site. There is streetlighting fronting the site. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. This project is within the CD zone, therefore the Water System Development Charge (SOC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.213 x the square footage of the site. Total fees for water is $15,053.78 at 70,675 sq. feet. 10,500 square feet of the existing site was previously paid in 1980. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for all existing water connections. 2. Preliminary fire flow is 5,000 gpm. Applicant will need five hydrants to serve this site. One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structure and five additional shall be located within 300 feet of the structure. Applicant has not shown the locations of all hydrants. 3. Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection, will be required to be retrofitted with a 5-inch quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. Fire flow exceeding 2,500 gpm requires a looped system. A water main extension in Williams Ave S will be required to increase fire flow to serve this site as the existing 6-inch main is not adequate. ";Ie '''5. A fire sprinkler system is required by the Fire Department. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation the double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system, if backflow device is to be installed inside the building. 6. Buildings that exceed 30 feet in height will require a backflow device to be installed on the domestic water meter. 7. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed. A plumbing permit will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1. This project is within in the CD zone, therefore the Sewer System Development Charge (SOC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.126 x the square footage of the site. Total fees for sewer is $8,905.05 at 70,675 sq. feet. 10,500 square feet of the existing site was previously paid in 1980. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for all existing sewer connections. 2. Food preparation facilities are proposed. A grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit will be required for installations inside the building. 3. Side sewers shall be 2% minimum slope. 4. Parking garages will require floor drains and floor drains shall be connected to the sanitary sewer through an approved oil/water separator located outside the building, wherever possible. Flows shall be directed through floor drains that are installed in accordance with the UPC to an exterior oil/water separator. The separator shall be sized to meet a minimum 15-minute retention time for peak flows anticipated in the garage area, but in no case will be less than 200 gallons of storage capacity. The type of interceptor shall be as manufactured by Pipe Inc., Utility Vault Inc., or approved equal. SURFACE WATER 1. No Surface Water System Development Charges (SOC) are owed on this site. 2. Applicant has submitted a drainage report and drainage plans for review. Preliminary review shows that applicant has addressed the core and special requirements per the 1990 KCSWM. The TIR demonstrates that detention and water quality are not required at this site. 3. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. • -'STRtET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Improvements including reconstruction of city sidewalks, curb, gutter, paving, storm drainage and streetlights may be required during construction, including new curb cuts. 2. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. MISCELLANEOUS 1. Separate permits for side sewers, water meters, landscape irrigation meter and any backflow devices will be required. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. 3. All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit. Proper drainage measures are required. The following note shall be included on the civil plan: "A licensed engineer with geo technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable material. Written verification by the engineer must be provided to the City of Renton public works inspector prior to approval of an occupancy permit or plat approval for the project. 4. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 5. A separate permit to cut and cap existing utilities to existing structures on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. PLAN REVIEW -GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards 2. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 3. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate and application fee shall be submitted at the sixth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425- 430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. There are no traffic mitigation fees owing. 2. Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. City of RII Department of Planning / Bui/ding / Public tis ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET COMMENTS DUE: JULY 14, 2004 DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 30, 2004 APPLICANT: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Jordan PROJECT TITLE: Merrill Gardens PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 81,175 s uare feet LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue S SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new , 155-unit senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. Specifically, vehicular and pedestrian access is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South to the, main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels is proposed from a 15-foot wide alley located east of the building. The applicant is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site in an adjoining lot. Project construction is planned to commence in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment ,Minor Major Information Iml'!'cts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water UahtlGlare Plants Recreation LandlShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. 'cular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and hav, ded to properly assess this proposal. ,~~=:I:~~~~~~h~~~~=.",.....,==....,...,.,.-:--:,,...., '==-----=-OO=-6 ___ -___ ~~~t--:;..+-_-"" ----.,-"'---.... ---,------"'''-,,-"", ' • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 2,2004 TO: Nick Afzali FROM: KayreI?-Kittrick SUBJECT: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Traffic Study Attached is a copy of the traffic study by Christopher Brown & Associates for the proposed Merrill Gardens Senior Assisted Living facility. 155 units are proposed to be located at the southwest comer of S.Tobin Street and Burnett Avenue S. There would be 453 additional generated trips in accordance with the ITE manual, 7th edition and the study. If the traffic mitigation fee were applied, this would generate a fee of $33,975.00. The study shows no adverse effects of this proposed development on the traffic, accidents, or level of service. The documentation seems thorough in support of the conclusion that the project requires no mitigation therefore does not trigger the fee under SEP A. Please review the study, and provide comments, if any, for the file. All comments are required for consideration for the staff report by July 14, 2004. This project will be going before ERC and the Hearing Examiner. Jan lIlian is the assigned plan reviewer, and Jason Jordan is the planner assigned to this project. Any project questions should be directed to them. CC: Jan lIlian Jason Jordan cc: [Click here and type name] / City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public ~ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICAT / !'!}'fEtr~lj'F?~ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fjvre., COMMENTS DUE: JUI fl' ,2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-070, SA-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JL Jt ~ , 20~UL - 1 2004 '..Jj -APPLICANT: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PROJECT MANAGER: '-dan ason J PROJECT TITLE: Merrill Gardens PLAN REVIEW: Jan Illiac. _1:".1' OF RENTON FIRE O~P~R"'lc i ... _. SITE AREA: 81,175 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 193,960 square feet - LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue S I WORK ORDER NO: 77273 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new 155-unit senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. Specifically, vehicular and pedestrian access is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South to the main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels is proposed from a 15-foot wide alley located east of the building. The applicant is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site in an adjoining lot. Project construction is planned to commence in early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probabie Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Imp!lcts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly asse this proposal. --.---. ··-=-S""jg==na:=-t""ur=e""'o""'f O::Cj""rec-'-· "'"to-:-::·r-"..,or=-A,...,uc-:th""'o""'rj'=zea=-",R""e=-y5=re=s,.,.Jen .... ta"":t.,.,;:fV;"e=--= ____ ~ .. _~==-=-=-v.i=::II!:_~_=_=._=__ D... . -zP /0 y ... .) 1" !, (..... \ " . '\ :>1:.:',::; DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM July 1,2004 Jason Jordan, Senior Planner Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of $60, 140 is required based on $388.00 per residential unit. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: .. ' " , , 1. The preliminary fire flow is 5,000 gpm, one hydrant is required within ISO-feet of the structure and four additional hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. Any existing fire hydrants shall be up to current standards including 5-inch storz fittings. 2. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of fire sprinkler, fire alarm and standpipe systems. 3. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20-feet in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. Applicant cannot meet this requirement on the east side of the building adjacent to the alley. Fire code allows modifications if the building is fully fire sprinklered, so as an alternative to approved access the applicant shall provide standpipe outlets on the alley side of the building. ., '_ I • Proposed MHlgstlon M ... u,..: 1. The applicant will be required to pey the appropriate Fire MItigation Faa. 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Pari<s MItigation Fee. 3. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Traffic MItigation Fee. 4. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 5. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jason Jordan, Senior Planner. Davalopment Services Division, 1055 South Grady Wey, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on July 14, 2004. This maHer Is also ~ scheduled for a public hearing on Auguat 24, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you ara Intarestad In attending tha hearing, please contact the Davelopment Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal belore the Hearing Examiner. II you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional Information by man, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submlls written comments wl1l automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jason Jordan, Senior Planner· Tel: (42S) 430·7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION " .. " .... ....... , ... If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further Infonmatlon on this proposed project, complete: this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. I File No./Name: LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF I Merrill Gardens I NAME: __________________________________________ ___ ADDRESS: ________________________________________ ___ TELEPHONE NO.: ___________ _ • DATE: June 30, 2004 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF PROJECT NAME: Merrtll Gardenl PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant II requeltlng SIte Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new 155-unlt lenlor retirement residence. The project would con,lat 01 two lower levels of parking (92 atructured parking staUa) with four lavela of realdentlel unIte abova. ACcel1 to the alte la proposed from Burnett Avenue South end the public elley loceted asst of the propoled building. SpeCifically, vehicular and pedestrian accell 'I proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South to the main entrance of the building. VehIcular accell to the parking levell II propoled from a 15-foot wide alley located ealt ot the butldlng. The applicant la propoalng nina additional temporary parking alall. to be located north of the 81ta In an adJoining lot. Project conltructlon II planned to commence In early 2005 and be lubltantlally completed by the end of that year. PROJECT LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue OPTIONAl. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE· MITIGATED (DN5-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that signilicant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton Is using the Optional ONS·M process to gIve notice that a ONS-M Is likely to be ISSUed. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period follOwing the Issuance of the Threshold Oetennlnation 01 Non. Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS.M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 23, 3004 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 30, 2004 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Steve Johnston Tol: (206) 262-6512 Email: aJohnatonOcbeaHIe.com PermltalRevlew Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Sita Plan Approval Other Permltl which may be required: Building and Construction Permits Requested Studlel: Geotechnical Study, Stormwater AnaIYII., Traffic a Parking Analysll a Archeological Resource Survey Location where application may be revIewed: PlannlngiBulldlngfPublic Workl Department, Development Services DiviSion, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 96055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing ~ scheduled lor Auguat 24, 2004 beforelhe Renton Hearing ExamIner In Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: l.and Ua.: Environmental Documentl that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulation. Uaad For Project Mitigation: Center Downtown (CO) zoning and comprehensive plan land use designation SEPA Checklist, drainage report, and geotechnical report The project will be sUbJoctto the CIty's SEPA Ordinance, Zoning Code, Public Works Standards, Uniform Building Code, Unllorm Fire Code, and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. CERTIFICA TION I, (1)eo:.k. Jo r~n , hereby.£..ertify that 3 copies of the .................. '''',\, above document were posted by me in ....s conspicuous places on or nearby __ -~~\."i.~.~~",.t~he described property on J",,1v '$,\=. do. 00'1 _ :~'tt...~ .. :~SSIO", ~"':iY~ "1. 7 ; ~ ... ~"I'-~ ... ~ ~ ; N; ~OTA~y ~\-1\ ~. Signed: :.......:..---=-~4=---L....,l.J~':&.!;JA/1J;/ ~ : .... _ (J): ATtEST: SUbscnb/~worn efore me, a Notary Public, in an ,vlj6 ~ <P. \ ,oUSUC l Walhington residi~~ ----'-,on the Ci:::-h: day 0 \A\ ... ~! . ~ 't. "~~· .. 8·29 0'" .·..to.: ., * ... :I ••• ,.~-f, 0 ......... ~\7 : '1" '!: WAS"'\~ ......... .. '""" ................... ... MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29·07 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: June 30, 2004 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF PROJECT NAME: Merrill Gardens PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) review to construct a new 155-unlt senior retirement residence. The project would consist of two lower levels of parking (92 structured parking stalls) with four levels of residential units above. Access to the site Is proposed from Burnett Avenue South and the public alley located east of the proposed building. Specifically, vehicular and pedestrian access Is proposed from a looped drive off of Burnett Avenue South to the main entrance of the building. Vehicular access to the parking levels Is proposed from a 15-foot wide alley located east of the building. The applicant Is proposing nine additional temporary parking stalls to be located north of the site In an adjoining lot. Project construction Is planned to commence In early 2005 and be substantially completed by the end of that year. PROJECT LOCATION: 104 Burnett Avenue OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 23, 3004 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 30, 2004 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Steve Johnston Tel: (206) 282-8512 Email: sjohnston@cbeattle.com Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Site Plan Approval Other Permits which may be required: Building and Construction Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Study, Stormwater Analysis, Traffic & Parking Analysis & Archeological Resource Survey Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing tentatively scheduled for August 24, 2004 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Center Downtown (CD) zoning and comprehensive plan land use designation SEPA Checklist, drainage report, and geotechnical report The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance, Zoning Code, Public Works Standards, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, and other: applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. I Proposed Mltlgatl ... t Measures: 1. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee. 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee. 3. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee. 4. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 5. The applicant will be required to follow the recommendations contained with the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared for this project with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jason Jordan, Senior Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on July 14, 2004. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on August 24, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about ihis proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mall, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jason Jordan, Senior Planner Tel: (425) 430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF / Merrill Gardens NAME: ________ ~------------------------------------- ADDRESS: ____________________________________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: _____________ __ I Agencies Steve Johnston Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC (Signature of Sender):/ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) SS ) See Attached Contact Owners Applicant > ....... "~~"\\\,' ..... ~\t·fN ~" •• : ........ I, : ,,':~~\SS/O;:" "" "1 -"0"''' rv • ""-A. I : :0 N07: ~,.'~ ~ ; l AI~ ~:~ \'~ ~ , (/) : ,-r). ::D: -n ~ ~ -t: ..0 .~ m· ." ~ ,_. 'l'b 0,:" -: J~ '. vbl.IC : ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker .~ ····~.;>9 ,..... i signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntarY'a(~r!Of'~es and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,:: I~.)(; .... ~ Dated: --1/tIJ lOY ashington MARILYN KAMCHEFF Notary (Print): ____ --IUIMV~LAiV'I~t'l:pgllPll~~nE~PHIT_!;,~""P~IRr:~5.1O.S .;.!I,?DL.I,ID.J...7 __________ _ My appointment expires: Merrill Gardens LUA04-070, SA-H, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology * 3190 160th Ave SE Attn. SEPA Reviewer Bellevue, WA 98008 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program 4717 W Marginal Way SW * Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 South center Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Eric Swennson 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98104-5004 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing -~'-~ . ~~ - -..u, . -- . Kathy Keolker-Wheeler. Mayor June 30, 2004 Steve Johnston- Curtis Beattie & Associates 3131 Ell itt Avenue #270 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Merrill Gardens LUA~04-ci70, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Johnston: CITY " l-RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department . Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator . The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for considerationby the-EnVironmental Review Committee on July 27, 2004. Prior tothat review, you Vlr'illosnotifij3dif any additional information is required to continue processing YOl.kapp·lication. ..; . . . A Public Hearing is tentatively scheduled with the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1065 Sou~h Grady Way, Henton, -Washington,on August24,~004 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to.bepres.entat the public hearing. A . copy of thestaft report will be niajled to you one week before the hearing. If th~ Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard a~ part of this public hearing. - Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions . . Senior Planner cc: Tennessee Group LLC & McLendon Hardware Inc. IOwner Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC IApplicant '.~ --------.~---lO-S-S--S-ou-th-·-6-ra-dy--W.-ay-----R-e-nt-o-n,-·-W.-a-sh-in-g-to-n-9-S-0-SS-'-· ---. -~--=-------:-, ---R-E-N--T-.O-N-* This paper contains 50% recycled malenal. 30% posi consumer AHEAD OFTHE CURVE POk-O~2.. L _A04 -070 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Tennessee Group LLC & PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: I McLendon Hardware Inc. Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre ADDRESS' 715 Lind Ave. SW PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 104 Burnett Ave. S 98055 CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 235-3555 00072000154 7231502120 00072000156 7231502030 00072000104 APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): outdoor storage,parking/retail/office NAME: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Senior Housing COMPANY (if clo Friedman Development applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Center Downtown ADDRESS P.O. Box 1018 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NA CITY: Mercer Island ZIP: 98040 EXISTING ZONING: CD Center Downtown TELEPHONE NUMBER (206) 232-8330 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NA CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (in square feet): 80,025 SF before vacation 81,175 SF after vacation NAME: Steve Johnston SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED COMPANY (if applicable): Curtis Beattie & FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING Associates THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): NA - ADDRESS 3131 Elliott Ave. # 270 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): 155 units/1.84 = 84.2 units/acre CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98121 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NA TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ) (206) 282-8512 sjohnston@cbeattie.com 155 units Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/p1anning/masterapp.doc 06/16/04 PR(;_ "':CT INFORMATION JcontinL. __ J) ~--~----------~--------------------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 0 PROJECT VALUE: $15,000,000.00 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 193,960 SF IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 0 o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): 0 o FLOOD HAZARD AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):12,906 SF o GEOLOGIC HAZARD NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if o HABITAT CONSERVATION applicable):12,906 SF o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): 13 o WETLANDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. ___ sq. ft. (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NE/NW QUARTER OF SECTION 18/17 , TOWNSHIP 23, RANGE~, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Site Plan Review S2000.00 3. 2. Environmental Review S500.00 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: S21.83 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP A c.. N ()fV I, (Print Name/s) , declare that I am (please check one) "6 the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~ LM c..LE: NOn r.J ~ ~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the _ \ ~~ J Pre.si~0\k uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. MIC+lA8.AVIt. L&JDVN J1.i~nat ofow~r/~rese tative) M(..~ -lA ~\IVIINt-J r~, __ .... """ .... ,'", Iq {, (" ~ ---~1'E fv1 '" .' U·t' '-.)~ ~ I. _ .£ ~_ ~. n# ;~~ ......... :.S~\ l?(~ ~ !#:."ie}~\ON~~~·..:O\' ~~_ JA. Nota,y Public in and for the State of Washington : :g~OTARY ~.: ~ ~~ ) WlttVHt~ ~ :u --C 00: ~ ~ --re.n\ll~~G~.UL ", .... PUBL\ ~ ... ~~ (Si a .wner/B.eprefen~e) 't \P/!···.!O_29~~ .... ~(j,! , ~. 01(~ ~, Notary(Print)MIII(.P€.TrlE M . ..EILLL-'b~~O;;WAS~~C:: r~ I \\""" ........ --- My appointment expires: / tJ -z. 9' -t:J ~ Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.doc 06/16/04 I. ._~ ,,/ ~~J'.', "'t:II€"l. LIST OF SURROUNDING ~/P:tf't{~~ZNING PROPERTY OWNERS IfE~:2J2t ~ WITHIN 300-FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE tr;;~'V~1f City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PROJECT NAME: t'lEe£' L L o,,6,R'OEN, 2 AT C?E.N,ToN "'ENTI'2.E APPLICATION NO: 04 -127Q The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will no~ify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\owners.doc08/29/03 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER '. Jun 0.8 04 12:55p curtis beattie 206-282-4799 .' NAME (Print Name) (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) ADDRESS Applicant Certification ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were obtained from: \\\\\11\" 1111/ \\\ uONG C ///1 Records .$-" q,Y-••••• : -1(; 111/ ~imrc:cn:ni1Vi~~~rnriR d ~. ~S\6'" ~-t. /. /- "11 In rs ecor s ~ .;',,10' ",/;. ~ ~/ ' /J I! g :'CJo ~OTARy (-..... '% Signed~~ pate 'L', 2.t1~¥:.. ~:;, ; ~ (Applicant) ~!P • • ~ ~ ~~ ··~(J(Yi.~O.~.·· 0 .$ '/ ~~ ...... c",~ NOTARY . 111/1 Or: WAST'\~\\\\' ATIESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Nota4f.:.bIiC, in and for the State b'tWaSM"9ton, -,!, tJ on the day of '3'()V\-e I 20~ . ..... For City of Renton Use"""" ,., ............ ""'" ..... ..., VA " --..... ~\..'" " .""tIt. 'lIt CERTIFICATION OF MAILING /-~~.:. .... \ss",c/ii~.~~\ : ~ •• ·~vo· :.r.()' •• '~ I, 11~\vL~ , hereby certify that notices of the proposed applifitlo~~e~~~~ ~\ ~ ~ ty Employee) _ :: : -._ en: ~ \ '-• /:J .'" each listed Rroperty owner on ......, v.ne 3D..2£X)l(' ~ ~ ... Us UC .: ! ~ 1 ~.,... ..~~ .-1 .. _I/. " :;o.~· •• 8·29 01 .. ·~o.: Signed.... ~ Date: 'f" ...... .-..... ~~,:o- '" AS"'\: ............ ... . '\\\\" ...... "" ... ... NOTARY Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\owut:r5.doc re, in and for the State of Washington residing ~~~==-___ ,20-,&, MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIR p.2 2 # 1 *--------------------: MetroScan / King :Graham Dean L/Kerri L :77 Wells Ave S Renton 9~055 :18435 SE 133rd PI Renton Wa 98059 :106 Off, Office Building :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR 0 C LY N OF , Owrier :Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 2 Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:3,176 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Sherrill Les R Site :88 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :42-117 Old Kalanianaole Rd Kailua Hi 96734 :005 Res,Fourplex :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 730 FT E & Use Lgl Bedrm: # 3 Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:1,927 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Caniparoli Louis J Site :84 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :84 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON E LN OF Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:1,700 # 4 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Righi Angelo Site :78 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :1109 N 37th St Renton Wa 98056 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT A PT Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,320 # 5 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Righi Angelo Site :78 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :1109 N 37th St Renton Wa 98056 :006 Res, Single Family Res,Comm Zone :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT A PT Use Lgl Bedrm: # 6 Bth F3H: / /1 Stories:1 BldgSF:290 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Righi Angelo Site :*no Site Address* Renton Mail :1109 N 37th St Renton Wa 98056 :309 Vacant, Commercial :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 810.9 FT E Use Lgl Bedrm: # 7 Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Johnson James G Site :84 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :4258 Sunset Dr Lake Oswego Or 97035 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 100 FT N OF Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,200 # 8 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Oharra Michael E Site :94 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :94 Williams Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 50 FT N OF Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,660 # 9 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Parkside At 95-burnett Llc Site :95 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :2256 38th Pl E Seattle Wa 98112 Use Lgl Bedrm: :309 Vacant, Commercial :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 60 FT W OF Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: :-------------------------------* Parcf. Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :000720 0008 :06/29/2000 : $ 5 15 , 0 0 0 Fu 11 :$497,000 S:17 T:23N R:05E 01 Q:NW Ac: .25 YB:1987 Ph:425-235-6823 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0012 05 Sale Date :07/03/1984 Sale Price :$67,000 Asd.V :$161,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .14 YB:1904 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 0013 : 03/21/1984 Asd.V :$81,300 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E 04 Ac: .09 YB:1924 Ph:425-226-2554 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 0014 Asd.V :$162,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E 03 Ac: .14 YB:1925 Ph:425-271-9730 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 0014 Asd.V :$162,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E 03 Ac: .14 YB:1940 Ph:425-271-9730 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V : 000720 0015 :$47,000 T:23N R:05E 02 Q:NE S:18 Ac: .09 YB: Ph: 425-271-9730 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 0053 Asd.V :$170,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .12 YB:1941 Ph: 05 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0055 03 Sale Date :10/31/1985 Sale Price :$55,000 Asd.V :$151,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.14 YB:1940 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 Ac: .60 YB: :000720 0073 :04/02/2004 : $725,000 :$312,700 T:23N R:05E Ph: 01 Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. # 10 *---------------------: MetroScan / King -Owner :Starkovich Rudy J Trus .Site :75 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :810 N Riverside Dr Renton Wa 98055 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 11 :309 Vacant/Commercial :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON ELY LN Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: ·K _____________________ • MetroScan / King Owner :Stauff Richard J/Betty J Site :13813 139th Ave SE Renton 98059 Mail :13813 139th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 12 :309 Vacant/Commercial :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 730 FT E OF Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Gannon J K & L E Living Trst Site :105 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :22925 SE 292nd PI Kent Wa 98042 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 13 :011 Res,Apartment :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 THAT POR OF D C Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:3,792 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Tomalin William E & Mary E Site :103 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :10464 Forest Ave S Seattle Wa 98178 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 THAT POR OF D C Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:600 # 14 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :St Lukes Episcopal Church Site :99 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :99 Wells Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 15 :165 Pub, Church, Religious Services :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT SE COR Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:6,673 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :St Lukes Episcopal Church Site :99 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :99 Wells Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 16 :165 Pub, Church, Religious Services :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT SE COR Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:925 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :St Lukes Episcopal Church Site :99 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :99 Wells Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 17 :165 Pub,Church,Religious Services :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT SE COR Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:4,800 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Storwick Russell Trust Site :99 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 727 Anacortes Wa 98221 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT NE COR Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:880 # 18 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Tennessee Group L L C Site :91 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :710 S 2nd St Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON W LN OF Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:2 BldgSF:1,810 :-------------------------------* ParcE Sale i.Jdte :000720 0075 :07/03/2002 Sale Price Asd.V :$284,400 S:18 T:23N R:05E Q:NE Ac: .54 YB: Ph: 09 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0077 07 Sale Date :04/22/1994 Sale Price :$11,000 Full Asd.V :$30,100 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: . 06 YB: Ph : :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :000720 0090 : 0111511991 Asd.V :$282,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.26 YB:1945 Ph: 00 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :000720 0093 Asd.V :$115,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E 07 Ac:.14 YB:1941 Ph:206-772-2927 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0095 05 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$690,700 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.55 YB:1928 Ph: :-----------------~-------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :000720 0095 Asd.V :$690,700 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .55 YB:1952 Ph: 05 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0095 05 Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$690,700 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.55 YB:1961 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :000720 0096 :01/08/2004 Asd.V :$132,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.13 YB:1924 Ph: 04 ._------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :000720 0109 :03/07/1996 Asd.V :$158,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .13 YB:1930 Ph: 09 Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. # 19 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Mkd Development Co Inc :Williams Ave S Renton , Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 20 :10020a Main St #BII0 Bellevue Wa 98004 :301 Vacant, Multi-family :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT NE COR Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: ,----------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Cooper Robert T Site :87 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :87 Williams Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 203 FT N OF Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,050 # 21 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Schmidt Margaret L Site :95 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :7136 S Sunnycrest Rd Seattle Wa 98178 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG ON E LN BLK Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l BldgSF:l,600 # 22 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Stauff Richard J/Betty J Site :101 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :13813 139th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG AT PT ON W Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:780 # 23 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Tennessee Group L L C Site :81 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :710 S 2nd St Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 203 FT N OF Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,160 # 24 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Meakin Violet Site :75 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :7100 S Taft St Seattle Wa 98178 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR TOBIN H Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:l,510 # 25 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Tennessee Group L L C Site :79 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :710 S 2nd St Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR TOBIN H Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,080 # 26 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Salvation Army Site :65 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 9219 Seattle Wa 98109 :165 Pub, Church, Religious Services :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 411.52 FT N Use Lgl Bedrm: # 27 Bth F3H: / -/ Stories:l BldgSF:7,146 *---------------------: MetroSca-n / King Owner :Bueno Carlos E/Shannon Site : 98 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail : 913 Harrington Ave NE #6 Renton Wa 98056 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG INTER E LN Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,460 :-------------------------------* Parc, ~ Sale uate Sale Price Asd.V Q:NW S:17 Ac: ,16 YB: : 000720 0111 : 09/25/1998 : $485, 000 Full :$70,000 T:23N R:05E Ph: 05 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 Oll8 Asd.V :$176,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.14 YB:1936 Ph: 08 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 000720 0122 :04/25/1985 Sale Price Asd.V :$131,000 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1937 Ph: Q:NW Ac: .13 02 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0125 09 Sale Date :04/22/1994 Sale Price :$76,000 Full Asd.V :$116,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.05 YB:1927 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0130 02 Sale Date :01/19/2001 Sale Price :$135,000 Asd.V :$158,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.12 YB:1937 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 0138 :06/03/1988 Asd.V :$145,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .13 YB:1939 Ph: 04 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :000720 0139 03 Sale Date :03/07/1996 Sale Price Asd.V :$147,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .14 YB:1939 Ph: :-------------------------------* :000720 0140 Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V :$740,900 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1985 Ph: Q:NW Ac:.43 00 ._------------------------------* Parcel # : 000720 0145 05 Sale Date : ll/06/2003 Sale Price :$88,000 Asd.V :$144,000 Q:NW S: 17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .14 YB:1943 Ph: lriformation compiledfrom various sources_ Real Estate Sollltions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of iriformation contained in this report_ # 48 *---------------------: MetroScan / King 'Owner :Ryan Maxwell H Site :82 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 336 Renton Wa 98057 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence LgI :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 N 50 FT OF S Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,000 # 29 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Starkovich Rudy J Trust Site :77 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :810 N Riverside Dr Renton Wa 98055 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 30 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 31 :309 Vacant, Commercial :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG NW COR OF Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Brozovich Frank W & Darlene J :66 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 :7547 S Laurel St Seattle Wa 98178 :122 Off,Medical,Dental :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 N 130 FT OF S Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,849 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Newman Jon/Linda Site :74 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :8070 S Langston Rd Seattle Wa 98178 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR OF D C BEG Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,660 # 32 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Gannon Greg Site :115 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 391 Hobart Wa 98025 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR OF D C LY Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,920 # 33 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :St Lukes Episcopal Church Site :Williams Ave Renton Mail :99 Wells Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 34 :301 Vacant, Multi-family :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 100 FT N OF Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Ren Four Inc Site :100 Blk Of Wls Renton Mail :PO Box 59 Renton Wa 98057 Use Lgl Bedrm: # 35 :301 Vacant, Multi-family :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR OF D C LY Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :St Lukes Episcopal Ch Rento Site :81 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :99 Wells Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 E 120 FT OF N Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,440 # 36 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: :Newman Jon/Linda :78 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 :8070 S Langston Rd Seattle Wa 98178 :005 Res,Fourplex :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 POR OF D C BEG Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,240 :-------------------------------* ParcE :000720 0147 03 Sale Udte :12/17/1996 Sale Price :$62,000 Full Asd.V :$155,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .14 YB:1910 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 Ac: .16 YB: :000720 0148 :07/03/2002 :$81,400 T:23N R:05E Ph: 02 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 0160 :08/09/2000 Asd.V :$445,800 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E 05 Ac:.24 YB:1979 Ph:206-772-2968 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :000720 0161 : 07/15/1991 Asd.V :$134,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .14 YB:1910 Ph: 04 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 000720 0162 :02/23/1993 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NW :$171,000 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1925 Ph: Ac: .15 03 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 000720 0164 Asd.V :$54,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.12 YB: Ph: 01 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :000720 0168 Asd.V :$42,500 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.10 YB: Ph: 07 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 000720 0186 Sale Price Asd.V Q:NW : $131, 000 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1926 Ph: Ac: .11 05 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :000720 0189 : 07/15/1991 Asd.V :$238,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .14 YB:1962 Ph: 02 Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of iriformation contained in this report. # ;37 Owner .Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 38 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 39 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 40 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 41 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 42 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Housing Authority :51 Burnett Ave S Rentol! 98055 :PO Box 2316 Renton Wa 98056 :011 Res,Apartment :BLK POR LOT POR TOBIN H H-DC #37 Bth F3H: / / Stories:4 BldgSF:47,008 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Washington Mutual Savgings Bank :150 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 :PO Box 7788 Newport Beach Ca 92658 :162 Pub, Bank :BLK 4 LOT 1-2 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:7,294 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Washington Mutual Savings Bank :150 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 :PO Box 7788 Newport Beach Ca 92658 :159 Pub,Parking,Associated :BLK 4 LOT 3 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Musicians Hall :126 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 :3541 Canterbury Ln Kent Wa 98032 :101 Com, Retail Store :BLK 4 LOT 4 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bth F3H: / / Stories:l BldgSF:6,100 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Musicians Hall :126 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 :3541 Canterbury Ln Kent Wa 98032 :159 Pub,Parking,Associated :BLK 4 LOT 5 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------: MetroScan / King Bryan H/Jennifer L Burnett Pl S Renton 98055 Burnett Pl S Renton Wa 98055 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone 4 LOT 6 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Owner :Zug Site : 117 Mail: 117 Use : 006 Lgl :BLK Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l.5 BldgSF:2,230 # 43 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Sigette Mary Lou Site :116 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :116 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :003 Res,Duplex Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 6 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:4,350 # 44 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Nguyen Thanh M Site :113 Burnett Pl S Renton 98055 Mail :713 SW 353rd Pl Federal Way Wa 98023 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 7 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:6 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l.5 BldgSF:2,520 # 45 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :212 Wells Llc Site :108 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :212 Wells Ave S #J Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 8 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:l/ /1 Stories:2 BldgSF:910 :-------------------------------* Pare # Sale ,-,dte Sale Price :000720 0213 Asd.V :$3,018,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:l.09 YB:1977 Ph: 02 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0200 06 Sale Date :12/01/1993 Sale Price :$1,267,600 Full Asd.V :$741,600 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .46 YB:1968 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0210 04 Sale Date :12/01/1993 Sale Price :$1,267,600 Full Asd.V :$128,700 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .21 YB: Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 569600 0215 Asd.V :$262,200 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.19 YB:1958 Ph: 09 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V Q:NE S:18 Ac: .18 YB: :569600 0220 :$92,400 T:23N R:05E Ph: 02 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price Asd.V : 569600 0225 :10/01/2003 :$208,950 :$141,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E 07 Q:NE Ac: .07 YB:1910 Ph:425-687-7852 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0235 05 Sale Date :05/24/1988 Sale Price Asd.V :$192,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .09 YB:1902 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date :569600 0245 :09/24/2003 Sale Price Asd.V :$157,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1900 Ph: Q:NE Ac: .14 03 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0250 05 Sale Date : 03/18/2003 Sale Price :$160,000 Asd.V :$122,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .12 YB:1902 Ph: In/ormation compiled/rom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness o/information contained in this report. *---------------------: MetroScan / King "OWRer :Lu Khanh C/Hoa L;+ ,Site :106 Logan Ave S Renton ~8055 Mail :13414 SE 85th St Renton Wa 98059 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 9 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:1,660 # 47 *---------------------: MetroScan / King :Stauff Richard J :100 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 :13813 139th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 :005 Res,Fourplex :BLK 4 LOT 10-11 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 48 Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,908 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Stauff Richard J/Betty J Site :96 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :13813 139th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 11-12 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:950 # 49 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Kaercher Richard K & Karen Site :107 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 8 Hobart Wa 98025 Use :003 Res,Duplex Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 13 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,360 # 50 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Erue Donald C Site :101 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :14415 12th Ave SW Seattle Wa 98166 Use :195 Ind,Warehouse Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 13 & MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,152 # 51 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Erue Donald C Site :101 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :14415 12th Ave SW Seattle Wa 98166 Use :195 Ind,Warehouse Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 13 & MOTOR LINE ~DD TO Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:864 # 52 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Kaercher Richard K/Karen Site :115 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 8 Hobart Wa 98025 Use :101 Com, Retail Store Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 13 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:715 # 53 *---------------------. MetroScan / King Owner :Nguyen Thanh M Site :102 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :California Ave SW #200 Seattle Wa 98116 Use :301 Vacant, Multi-family Lgl :BLK 23 LOT 1 RENTON TOWN OF Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: # 54 *---------------------: MetroScan / King Owner :Mkd Development Co Inc Site :12810 35th Ave S Seattle 98168 Mail :10020a Main St #B110 Bellevue Wa Use :002 Res,Single Family Residence Lgl :BLK 23 LOT 2-3 RENTON TOWN OF 2 & Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 98004 BldgSF:2,800 :-------------------------------* Parc! ~ :569600 0255 00 Sale Udte :03/08/2001 Sale Price :$130,000 Asd.V :$122,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .11 YB:1904 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel if Sale Date Sale Price :569600 0260 Asd.V :$170,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.16 YB:1953 Ph: 03 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0261 02 Sale Date : 07/10/1998 Sale Price :$120,000 Full Asd.V :$118,000 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.08 YB:1908 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 569600 0275 :01/21/2003 Sale Price Asd.V :$153,000 S:18 T:23N R:05E YB:1929 Ph: Q:NE Ac: .10 06 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0276 05 Sale Date :04/04/1995 Sale Price :$120,000 Full Asd.V :$190,800 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.19 YB:1958 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0276 05 Sale Date :04/04/1995 Sale Price :$120,000 Full Asd.V :$190,800 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac:.19 YB:1998 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :569600 0277 04 Sale Date :01/28/2003 Sale Price Asd.V :$103,900 Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Ac: .03 YB:1920 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # :723150 1950 03 Sale Date :05/16/2003 Sale Price :$500,000 Asd.V :$50,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .11 YB: Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # : 723150 1955 08 Sale Date : 09/25/1998 Sale Price :$485,000 Full Asd.V :$199,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .28 YB:1942 Ph: Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report, *---------------------: MetroScan I King ··GwMer :Harper Richard S Jr .Site :12810 34th Ave S Seatt~e 98168 Mail :116 Williams Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Use :006 Res,Single Family Res,Comm Zone Lgl :BLK 23 LOT 4 RENTON TOWN OF Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:l/ / Stories:l BldgSF:2,800 # 56 *---------------------: MetroScan I King Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 57 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 58 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 59 :M/V Ents :124 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 :124 Williams Ave S Renton Wa 98055 :106 Off, Office Building :BLK 23 LOT 5 & 6 RENTON TOWN OF Bth F3H: / / Stories:l BldgSF:5,OOO *---------------------: MetroScan I King :U S Bank Corporate Props :858 S 2nd St Renton 98055 :2800 E Lake St Minneapolis Mn 55406 :162 Pub, Bank :BLK 23 LOT POR RENTON TOWN OF S 10 Bth F3H: / / Stories:l BldgSF:8,742 *---------------------: MetroScan I King :M/V Ents :Well Ave S Renton :124 Williams Ave S Renton Wa 98055 :159 Pub, Parking, Associated :BLK 23 LOT 13 RENTON TOWN OF N 40 Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------. MetroScan I King Owner :King Kenneth Site :121 Wells Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :350 Sunset Blvd N Renton Wa 98055 Use :003 Res,Duplex Lgl :BLK 23 & LOT 14 RENTON TOWN OF LOT Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l BldgSF:3,600 # 60 *---------------------: MetroScan I King Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 61 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 62 Owner Site Mail Use Lgl Bedrm: # 63 :Ren Four Inc :Well Ave S Renton :PO Box 59 Renton Wa 98057 :301 Vacant, Multi-family :BLK 23 LOT 15 RENTON TOWN OF Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: *---------------------. MetroScan I King :Cugini Alex Jr :710 S 2nd St Renton 98055 :611 Renton Ave S Renton Wa 98055 :101 Com, Retail Store :BLK 24 LOT 5 THRU 15 RENTON TOWN Bth F3H: / / Stories:l BldgSF:35,936 *---------------------. MetroScan I King :Storwick Russell Trust :115 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 :PO Box 727 Anacortes Wa 98221 :195 Ind,Warehouse :BLK 24 LOT 19 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Bth F3H: / / Stories:l BldgSF:4,625 *---------------------. MetroScan I King Owner :Storwick Russell Trust Site :101 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Mail :PO Box 727 Anacortes Wa 98221 Use :003 Res,Duplex Lgl :BLK 24 LOT 20 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Bedrm:8 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:l.5 BldgSF:2,860 :-------------------------------* ParcE 1 :723150 1965 06 Sale udte :09/12/2001 Sale Price : $205,000 Asd.V :$156,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: .14 YB:1942 Ph: :----~--------------------------* Parcel # :723150 1970 09 Sale Date :10/31/2001 Sale Price :$500,000 Asd.V :$490,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.25 YB:1967 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 723150 1979 Asd.V :$1,110,300 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.88 YB:1967 Ph: 00 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :723150 2005 06 Sale Date :10/31/2001 Sale Price :$500,000 Asd.V :$49,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: . 11 YB: Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date : 723150 2020 Sale Price Asd.V :$191,000 S:17 T:23N R:05E YB:1939 Ph: Q:NW Ac: .14 07 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :723150 2025 Asd.V :$17,500 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac: . 04 YB: Ph: 02 :-------------------------------* Parcel # :723150 2085 09 Sale Date :06/10/1986 Sale Price Asd.V :$2,047,200 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:l.52 YB:1981 Ph: :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price :723150 2125 :01/08/2004 Asd.V :$270,500 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.13 YB:1957 Ph: 01 :-------------------------------* Parcel # Sale Date Sale Price : 723150 2130 :01/08/2004 Asd.V :$189,000 Q:NW S:17 T:23N R:05E Ac:.13 YB:1929 Ph: 04 Information compiledfrom various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. PARCEL A: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) OEVELOPME CITY OF~~~~~NING JUN 2 3 200~ RECEIVED THAT PORTION OF HENRY TOBIN DONATION CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,' WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON PLAT, WHICH CORNER BEARS SOUTH 89°07' EAST A DISTANCE OF 30 FEET AND NORTH 0°46' EAST A DISTANCE OF 530 FEET FROM THE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SECOND AVENUE AND BURNETT STREET; THENCE NORTH 0°46' EAST A ,DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07' EAST A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°46' WEST A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°07' WEST A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO, LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, INCLUSIVE, AND LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 5 FEET OF SAID LOTS 1 THROU~H 3, CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR ALLEY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 2117471 AND 2117484; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 10 FEET OF THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF SAID LOT 3, CONVEYED FOR ALLEY BY RECORDING NUMBER 7811200482; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE ALLEY VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 3272, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7812140796 ADJOINING OR ABUTTING THEREON, WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL B: LOT 18, BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 135, IN KING COUNTY,' WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 5 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO ,THE CITY OF RENTON FOR ALLEY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2117478. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE HENRY TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF BURNETT STREET 150 FEET NORTH OF THE CLTACMA6IRDA/0909 .. -._ ... _--._-_. "':'":" : •• -::....::.=.:_. ----~ CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 24 A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF BURNETT STREET 50 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE-NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 24 A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF BURNETT STREET; THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF BURNETT STREET 50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF HENRY TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE EAST MARGIN OF BURNETT STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON NORTH 0°46' EAST 730 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND AVENUE; . THENCE SOUTH 89°07' EAST 115 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°46' EAST 75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07' WEST 115 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°46' WEST 75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL E: THAT PORTION OF HENRY TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS; PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. WHICH CORNER BEARS SOUTH 89°07' EAST 30 FEET AND NORTH 0°46' EAST 530 FEET FROM THE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSEGTION OF SECOND AVENUE AND BURNETT STREET; . THENCE NORTH 0°46' EAST 275 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 0°46' EAST 76.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07' EAST 115 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°46' WEST 76.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°07' WEST 115 FEET TO THE POINT ~F BEGINNING. CLTACMA6IRDAlD999 --------.----------.------_. CONSENT IN LIEU OF SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING McLENDON HARDWARE, INC. We, the holders of the number of shares of stock of McLENDON HARDWARE, INC., set forth after our signatures, and as the holders of all of the outstanding shares of the voting stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at a meeting of shareholders, ,do hereby consent to the purchase of the KMart property at 440 Rainier Ave. S., Renton, WA, and to the sale of the Renton store properties as incorporated in a resolution adopted.by the Board of Directors at its meeting on November 25, 2003. The text of the Board's resolution states: RESOLVED, that the President and Secretary are hereby authorized to use their own judgment and that of the Directors to execute this acquisition. ===7~~~~~~~n~a~t~u~r~e Date pson Irrevocable Family Trust No. Of Shares .... -------j-/D -D t.J-27,950.00 Trustee J -13 ~-oi Robert & Delora McLendon Irrevocable Family Trust S~:to1_ rf)~L-rGj)1 R. McLendon, Trustee C(,/1' c 76,122.00 ~ . I? T~~stee '. Irrevocable Family Trust 27,650.00 Theodore & Geraldine McLendon A ' V) I : . ) ,. I;; ., k C1J J .. VlA.cA~ Irrevocable Family Trust (-, 10 -DC! 41,472.00 Shell..ey LJ Barney, (!trustee Patrick & Rita McLendon Irrevocable'Family Trust 29,300.00 Scott A. McLendon, Trustee Jan McLendon Irrevocable Family Trust <--/vU~f' ,p ~'c.' 8,350.00 Mi hael P. Kauffman Trustee ~'1Z III Cj~~ ___ Gail,R. McLendon rJ , , ---f/ ; I, /7--J I' /,-' " (1-V Lj -' U~ 5,950.00 5,950.00 5,950.00 /-/ D --Dt} 1,800.00 1,800.00 Joan C. McCarty , #. yJ\;j'1 ~.'U-0' ··ftd/llA ~ / -/ S -6tj 1,800.00 2 Consent in Lieu ofSH Meeting -Purchase of KMart and Sale of Renton Properties · 12/a4/2ee~ 13:0& -42523535f MCLENDON HARDWARE CONSENT IN LJ:lio"U OF SRAREHOLDER.S· MEETING 'hklLENDON HAR:DWARE, INC., PAGE 02fB3 We, the holders of the numbe~ of Bha~ee of stock of McLENDON HARDWARE, INC., ~et forth after our signatur~B, and as the holders of all of the outatanding shares'of the voting stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at a meeting of shareholde~B; do he~cby consent to the purchase of che KMart property at 4~O Raini~r Ave. S., Renton, WAr and to ~h~ Bale Df the Renton otore properties as inoorporated in a r~Golution adopted by the Board of Directorc dL its meeting on November 25. 2003. The text of the Board'c reBolution states; RESOLVE~, that the President and secretary are hereby authorized to use their own judgment and that o:E the Directors to execut~ this acquisition. ' Trustee n .... tt:: ,Family Trust j -J 0 -D'-i' No. Of Sharo$ 27.950.00 Irrevocable F~mily Trust Brian W. Mc~enoon, Trustee Mi ael D. McLendon, Trustee ~PO; J?<:d[';,Z;~C-C-'i Sh~ll_ey L./Barney. ~stee v '10082-828 (808) 76.122 . .00 ,li~, 27,650.00 I~revocable Family Trust -u, 472.,00 hase:J pue ueo(' • 12/B4/2HB3 13:0~ MCLENDON HARDWARE PAGE 03/03 Patrick &. Rita McLendon lrrevoc.i:.lblc Fa.mily Trust' 29,300.(~O Scott A. MCLendon, Trustee Trust /-:5""-05" S,9SD.~O ; 5,950.i)O 5,950.00 /-I D--oLf /? -r)i../-CJ,3 l, 800. IjO 1-/3 -df 2 Consent in ",ieu o:e 5:H Meeting -E'urr;hil.se of lO')act and Sale of Renr:on propert;lcS vDE2-82E r8DS) hase:J pue ueor dSE:SD ED vD oaa RESOLUTION FOR Sale of Renton Store Properties Tennessee Group, L.L.C. Whereas it has beceme necessary fer this limited liability cempany to. sell alIef the Renten stere area preperties in erder to. purchase the KMart building at 440 Rainier Ave. S., Renten, WA it is hereby RESOLVED, that Gail R. McLenden and Michael D. McLenden, acting managers ef the limited liability cempany, are hereby autherized to. act fer this cempany. DOROTHY L. THOMPSON IRREVOCABLEJ?Aflffy '7[1s0I: _____ Date: i-/O--Ot./: Vtb.Y~~ < David J. Thempsen, Trustee Date: Date: I-/s-OY Jean C. McCarty, Trustee ~ .. ~~~ .u......:.~ '/t/~ Keri L. Thempsen, Tr stee ROBERT & DELORA MCLENDON IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST Date: i -, I [) -O~/ ~LJZ,]Jf]~··· Gail R. McLennen, Trustee Date: Date: FREDERICK & WANDA KAUFFMAN Date: r;z.-/-~-Oi THEODORE & GERALDINE MCLENDON Date: -'\D-l}~ Date: /-' I I' ,; t-! , . _ ..... -f.A,..J-1.c-. /,' . ,~. /.-~, .-'" '" '! ( ,· ... v .·vL- Brian W. McLenden, Trustee Shel ey~. Barney, rustee PATRICK & RITA MCLENDON IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST Date: Scett A. McLenden, Trustee Sale of Renton Store Area Properties 2004 a1/10/2004 12:18 -4252353559 MCLENDON ~RDWARE RESOLUTION FOR sale of Ronto~ Store P~operties Tenneaoee Group, L.L.C. PAGE 04 Whereas it company to sell to pUrCh;:lFi~ the it is hereby has become necessary for this limited liability all of the Renton store arG~ properties in order KMart building at 440 Rainier Ave. S .. Renton, WA ~SOLVED, that Gail R. McLendon "and Michael D. acting managers of the limited liability company, authorized to act for this company. McLendon, are hereby DOROTHY L. THOMPSON IRREVOCABLB F~Y "Jf~:J Date: I-/O-e:i: .~~'ff':-_ Date; , , ,. : -r" f) -. 0;-'; J c.. .L)ate: ROBZRT & DELORA MCLENDON Date. Date; Date.: PREDERICK & WANDA KAUF~ nnte: 1.:2.-/-S:;'-Of ~id J. Thompson, True C. IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST ~d~ff~ Mithael P. Kauffm THEODORE &'GERALDlNE MCLENDON Date: D.:1tc!: .1_! 11_ ""C)U : : V -' (1_, '-, 1-', "J\ ,\.;-'l'i ~ATRICK & RITA MCLENDON IRR~VOCABLE FAMlwY ~UST Dace: Scoc~ A. McLendon, Truscee vOE2-82E r808) h.:lSe:J pue ueor RESOLUTION FOR Sale of Renton Store Properties Tennessee Group I L.L.C. Whereas it has become necessary for this limited liability campany to sell all of the Renton store area properties in order to. purchase the KMart building at 440 Rainier Ave. S., Renton, ,WA it is hereby RESOLVED, that Gail R. McLendon and Michael D. McLendon, acting managers of the limited liability campany, are hereby authorized to act far this company. ::::~H_Y.L./L--L' J_;_~_~-=~_~L..S_ON_I_RR_E_V_OCABLE :;);::rt,U"h"V---==-==--~ David J. Thompson, Trustee Date: Jaan C. McCarty, Trustee Date: Keri L. Thampson, Trustee ROBERT & DELORA MCLENDON IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST JHMLJZ.)71~'" Gail R. McLendon, Trustee Date: Date: Date: FREDERICK & WANDA KAUFFMAN Date; T;ff!.-/ -~-C)i THEODORE & GERALDINE MCLENDON Date: Date: '7 ,'AA.....L.i ' ' /'1/ 6-' ".-/ AC-., , h da A. McLenda ; I ' ',J , -'7 ;-."...". /,.4...-::>-v/? Brian w. McLendan, Trustee PATRICK & RITA MCLENDON IRREVOCABLE._FAMILY TRU:T.,..0 ~/,----""d,-",' (,_I_--=--O--=--y___ ~ a: ~ 5~ Date: Scott A. McLendon, Trustee Sale of Renton Store Area Properties 2004 , VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION OEVELOPMENT PLANNING WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CITY OF RENTON FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS JUN 23 2mYt Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section ~~(c~llW~@ PROJECT NAME: MeRR.l ,/ 0f¥JO/rItS ~,~ fkusim~ DATE: ~l' Q:\WEB\Pw\DEVSERv\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls , DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIO WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property SeQ/ices S~tion PROJECT NAME: merriJ..L. 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section DATE: ¥ /.~/{)::f: '-. Q:\WEB\Pw\DEVSERv\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls ------- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION !OJ. 2(JO~ ti%© «;~§~ ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are Significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. . Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of tinie or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre 2. Name of applicant: Merrill Gardens Renton JVP LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: c/o ,Friedman Development P.O. Box 1018 Mercer Island W A 98040 4. Date checklist prepared: June 2004 5. Agency requesting checklist: Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction would like to begin the first quarter of 2005 with completion spring/summer 2006 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. . Adjacent property facing on Williams Street is reserved for possible future development. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A Phase I Environmental Assessment dated December 8, 2003 was prepared by Environmental Associates, Inc. and is available on request. A Geotechnical report dated June ,2004 by GEO Engineers is included with this submittal. A Traffic Report dated June ,2004 by Christopher Brown & Associates is included with this submittal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known, Site Plan Approval Mechanical & Electrical permits Partial Alley Vacation Plumbing & Sprinkler Permits Health Dept. Permit for Kitchen Elevator Permit Building Permit Water & Sewer Connection Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Senior Housing including 155 residential units on 4 floors with dining, administrative support, and common areas on the first floor. The Project also includes parking within the building for 92 cars on two levels, and 9 temporary stalls off the alley extension to Williams Street. 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if .reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Project is located at 104 Burnett St. A shy 2-acre site that includes about 550 feet on Burnett Street extending to Tobin St. on the north, and about 150 feet mid-block on Williams St. See survey and Legal Description. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one)~olling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The site is essential flat (less than 0.5%) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Loose soft and silty alluvial sediments over medium dense to dense alluvial interbedded silty sands, silts and gravels. See Geotech. Report d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Construction of the lower parking level will require excavation of approximately 4,000 CY of materials. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. Sloped cuts will be protected during construction and an Erosion Control Plan will be developed in accordance with City requirements. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Most of the site is currently impervious. After construction approximately 94 % of the site will be impervious. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None required beyond the City required Erosion Control Plan. 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities· if known. Excavation and construction will cause a temporary increase in local concentrations of suspended particulate. Dust suppression measures will be utilized during demolition and excavation. Vehicle emissions during construction will be temporary, however long term emissions will increase due to the increased parking supply. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None other than existing vehicular traffic. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Temporary construction impacts will be reduced through the use of electric construction equipment whenever possible and dust suppression during excavation. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Cedar River is approximately 2 blocks north of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve .. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so; describe. Storm water will be collected from the roof and· decks and piped to the existing storm system. . 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None required. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: None. __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs __ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None existing. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance· vegetation on the site, if any: The residential townhouses will have 'front yard'iandscaping and the second floor and roof terraces will have container landscaping. 5 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None observed Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other _______ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other _________ _ Fish: bass, salmbn, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None required. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be principal energy source for heating, power, lighting, and mechanical equipment motors. Natural gas will be used for central hot water boilers, main kitchen cooking, and limited residential fire places. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. There will be some solar shading of the property to the east. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The Project will use double glazing throughout and will comply with the State Energy Code, 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None required. 6 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The major source of noise in the area is existing street traffic,. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction traffic generated by the project is not anticipated to contribute significantly to existing noise levels in the area. Construction of the project will increase noise levels slightly between 7 AM and 8 PM on weekdays and occasionally on Saturdays. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None required. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The property on Burnett St. is used for accessory parking and open storage. The property on Williams St. has a 2 -story building used as offices ( to be demolished) and a 12,906 SF warehouse/store that is connected to the McLendon Hardware building to the south. The property to the south, fronting on 2nd Street is the old McLendon'Hardware Store and surface parking, currently being marketed to be re-leased to a retail user. To the west across Burnett St. is a vacant lot with permits pending for multi-family residential use. To the north across Tobin St. is a Salvation Army, to the east across the alley are 8 residential lots, plus a small I-story office building abutting the site. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. The Burnett St. portion has several small storage sheds totaling 11,000 SF to be demolished. On Williams St., a small 2-story office building will be demolished , and a 12,906 SF warehouse/retail building will be re-Ieased. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The 2-story office building on Williams St. will be demolished. The storage sheds in the fenced area along Burnett St. will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CD Central Downtown. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CD Central Downtown. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Project will be home to approximately 180-190 residence with a staff of approximately 13. 7 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Approximately 155 units of market rate senior housing will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None required. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The building will be about 64 feet high to the peak of the sloped roof. Principal materials will be Hardi-plank siding, Hardi-panel with board and battens, brick base structure and composition shingled roofing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Private views from adjacent multi-story building may be reduced. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None required. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from the residential units would be visible at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. 8 · c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None required. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Cedar River with its riverwalk system is 2 blocks away, as is the Renton Senior Center. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Common outdoor open space as well as common indoor amenity areas are provided on site. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None required. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is bordered by Burnett St, on the west, Tobin St~ on the north, the alley on the east turning to Williams St., and a mid-block port jon of the site abuts Williams St. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The downtown transit hub is located 1 block south on Burnett St. c. How many parking spaces would the .completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The Project will have 92 parking stalls in the structure and 9 temporary stalls off the alley extension to Williams St. Approximately 20 undesignated parking stalls will be eliminated. 9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? The proposal requires a vacation of the existing 10' alley extension to Burnett St. and a 20' alley easement to Williams St. plus a 5' alley widening easement on the west side of the alley. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. . f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See Traffic Analysis. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impaCts, if any: None required. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. By the nature of the increased intensity of use on site for senior housing, there will be an increased need for emergency medical attention and possible added police and fire protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any .. None required. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site· electricit ~itary s~ septic system, oth . b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrical energy will be the major source of energy for the Project.. However, natural gas will be used for the central hot water system, commercial kitchen, and a nominal number of residential fire places. . C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disciosure on my pa:.u- Proponent: ~:;: ;j- Name Printed: Date: 10 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Project Narrative Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre is a market rate congregate senior care housing development. The project will include 155 residential units, a two levd parking garage inside the building for 92 cars, a full service kitchen and dining facility as well as common area amenities. The site is located in the CD Center Downtown zone north of South Second St. on Burnett Ave. South extending down to Tobin St.. A portion of the site fronts on Williams Ave. South. The 80,025 SF site is currently occupied by storage sheds and parking for McLendon Hardware on the west side of the alley and the north portion of the McLendon's store and a small, two-story office building fronting on Williams St. The northeast portion ofthe block is occupied by single-family homes. There are no significant trees or vegetation on the site. The alley currently connects to Burnett Ave, by a 10' wide alley right of way through the existing parking lot. This project proposes to vacate that portion of the alley and relocate the alley access to an easement on the portion of the site that fronts on Williams Ave. The two-story office building north of the hardware building will be demolished to make way for the access relocation as well as 9 temporary parking stalls. The remaining 100 feet of frontage on Williams is occupied by an addition to the McLendon Hardware building and will remain. It is expected that this building will be leased to the tenant of the hardware building. This project will also grant a 5-foot easement on the west side of the remaining alley right of way to provide a total access width of 15 feet. The proposed building will occupy all of the Burnett Ave. frontage of approximately 550 feet. The building will be 5 stories high at the south and step down to 2 stories high at Tobin St. on the north. The existing storage sheds and surface parking will be demolished. This project also includes new sidewalks and street trees on Burnett Ave. and Tobin St. Estimated construction cost is $15,000,000.00 Parking for this project will be provided in a 2-level parking garage within the building. Parking will be accessed from the alley. Even though no parking is required for projects in the CD zone, the project includes 92 stalls. This will provide 0.5 stall per residential unit plus 14 stalls for employees and visitors. The traffic report for this project substantiates this parking ratio. Most of the building will have no basement. The exception is the lower parking level. It will be 6 feet below the alley level. Approximately 4,000 Cu Y d of material will be excavated for the garage construction. .. -. MODIFICATION REQUESTS The proposed building includes a trash. and recycle room inside the building_ The code requires 1.5 SF per dwelling unit for recycling and 3.0 SF per dwelling unit for trash. For this project,.a total of698 SF is required. We propose to provide a 380 SF room. Experience has shown that senior housing tenant only produce about half as much trash and recycling as typical mutli-family residence. Locating the collection room inside the building will keep the alley cleaner and keep the trash out of site of the neighbors. The trash room is located for easy access by the trash hauler. Fnename: e8A FilesfProjectsiMerrlll GardensiProjectNarra!lve 2.doc Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Construction Mitigation Narrative Construction should commence during the winter (lst Quarter) 0[2005, subject to perniits and financing. Completion and occupancy should be during summer of 2006. Construction activity will be during permitted working hours, between 7 AM and 8 PM, depending on the trades involved. If required, Saturday work will be limited to between 9 AM and 8 PM. At this early stage of the Project, the haul route has not been finalized. It will most likely be along S. 3rd Street, Bronson and Sunset Blvd to access Interstate 405. Hauling will be limited to between 8:30 AM and 3:30 PM, M-F. A construction plan, including haul routes and hours, construction hours and traffic control will be submitted to the Development Services Division prior to the start o(construction. Should traffic stoppage be required on either Burnett Avenue or Williams Avenue for truck delivery or departure, the appropriate traffic control measures will be implemented. In addition, dust suppression and truck cleaning as is standard in the industry will be provided. Temporary erosion control per King County and the City of Renton will be installed and maintained for the duration of the Project. FEcnamo: eRA Filc:siProjectsitlerrili Gan)ensfConstrur;;ion l\:1itigahln ~jarral;vc,dcc Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre 1. Pedestrian Entries Urban Center Design Overlay Statement of Compliance Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre is a unique blend of congregate senior housing with first floor residential "townhouse" apartments. The main entry is defined by a covered porte-cochere for passenger drop off, and a looped walkway connecting to the public sidewalk. The ten "townhouse" units at the north end of the property all have front yards with low ornamental fences, gates, and walkways to the individual covered front porches. 2. . Transition to Surrounding Development Although the zoning envelope allows structures to 95 feet high, Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre at 5-stories and approximately 65 feet high, is more appropriately scaled to the more recent existing and planned developments. The building base, at ground level is pulled out to the edge of the widened alley on the east, and back of sidewalk on the southwest. The southern part of the base structure provides a more commercial relationship to the sidewalk and downtown. The only setback area is at the ground floor residential townhouses on the northwest to provide individual front yards. Above the second floor, the building is set back from the base structure below on the east and west faces. With common terrace areas, individual patios, and landscaping at the second floor level, this serves to visually break up the scale and mass of the building. The building modulation, balconies, pitched roof form, and treatment of the fayade all work to articulate the building and reinforce its residential character. To complement this reduction in scale; the building steps down to the north, terminating in a two-story fayade along Tobin Street. 3. Location and Design of Parking A porte-cochere is provided at the main entrance for the protection and security of the residence. Residents and staff parking is provided on two levels accessed from the alley and screened from site. 4. Vehicular Access -See No.3 above. 5. Pedestrian Circulation -See No.1 above. 6. Common Space A variety of common spaces are provided to meet the needs ofthe senior residents: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Urban Center Design Overlay Statement of Compliance Page 2 of3 Exterior Spaces - Building Entry -passive sitting/waiting area Northwest comer of Burnett and Tobin -landscape feature/seating Second Floor South Terrace -Resident "garden" Second Floor West Terrace -Landscaped courtyard Second Floor East Terrace -Landscaped courtyard ·Fifth Floor Roof Terrace -Landscape Courtyard Interior Spaces - Entry "living room" Game Room Media Room Library Activity Room 7. Landscaping Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre is an urban senior housing development designed to integrate with the downtown street/sidewalk grid. Both Burnett Street and Tobin Street will have street trees. At the south end of the building planters will be used as a buffer between the sidewalk and dining room. At the porte'- cochere, a continuous landscape buffer is located between the sidewalk and entry drive. The sidewalk! arcade to the main entry will utilize large-scale pots to soften the hard edge of the storefront. The townhouses will have low-gated residential front yards extending around the remaining sidewalk perimeter with a landscaped feature at the comer. The residential units above are set back from the base structure below with a uniform spacing of edge plantings on both the east and west terraces. At the south, west, and east terraces the planting is increased to define the common outdoor area. The same is true at the fifth floor terrace on the north. 8. Building Architectural Design • Character and Massing The building has a strong base structure element' that expressed a more commercial street edge character on the south end and a residential townhouse character on the north end. The building above is broken into -two elements connected by a "bridge" which reflects a strong residential character with offsets, decks and balconies providing the desired ,.. . ... . Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre . Urban Center Design Overlay Statement of Compliance Page 3 of3 modulation and articulation along the fayade. The ground floor use of masonry evokes a more commercial feel to the south with larger windows, pre-cast lintels, overhead canopies and wall sconces and a distinctively residential feel at the townhouses to the north. The commercial fayade is recessed at the entry and is highlighted by a porte-cochere element which breaks the horizontal line and extends out to the sidewalk. • Building Rooflines The building is capped with a pitched roofwhich forms a mechanical well on the center of the building to contain mechanical equipment and roof vents. As the building steps down to the north, the pitched roof helps make that scale transition. The roof will be sheathed in a 3-tab composition roofing material. • Building Materials The masonry material used on the base structure allows an easy transition between the more commercial southerly portion to the townhouses on the north. Floors 2-5, set back from the base structure will be clad in a mixture of siding options utilizing beveled, clapboard, and board and batten systems. Decks and railings will be aluminum framed. DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. t!JO.o7.:5: square feet i 2. Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include public roadways, private access easements serving 3 or more dwelling units, and critical areas.* Total excluded area:** 2.' __ -___ square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: c? 3. CX:::>,C2'2..S square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. ISS" unitsllots ----- 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. BtI-.-z.. d.u./acre ____ lots or units would result in a net density of ____ dwelling units per acre. *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations not including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. R:\Pw\D EVSER V\Forms\Planning\density.doc O7lIS/0f I .. I DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. b 1 II I S-square feet 2. Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include public roadways, private access easements serving 3 or more dwelling units, and critical areas.* Total excluded area:**2. ____ ~ square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3. ~(l'~ ~ square feet I 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. .,. ~" acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. __ l_$"_>_._~ units/lots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6 .. ~~·3 d.u./acre ____ lots or units would result in a net density of __ -.-_ dwelling units per acre. *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas. determined by the. City to. be. not suitable. for . development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas. Regulations not including very high landslide. areas, protected slopes, wetlands. or floodways." . Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonns\Planning\density.doc07/lS/03 1 ! I " f DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM March 16, 2004 Jason Jordan, Senior Planner .' Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal oI,It- Merrill Gardens Senior Housing, 80-100 Blk Burnett Ave. S Fire Department Comments: . 1. The preliminary fire flow is determined by the total square footage, type of construction and exposures on all sides. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure based on 1 hydrant for each 1000 GPM or fraction thereof. The above information is needed to determine the fire flow. 2. A fire mitigation fee of $388.00 for each unit and $.52 a square foot for commercial square footage is required. 3. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 4. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. 5. Provide a list of the flammable, combustible. liquids and any hazardous chemical to be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. < i TO: CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY REVIEW FROM: Jason Jordan Jan lilian DATE: . March 23, 2004 SUBJECT:· PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS MERRILL GARDENS SENIOR HOUSING / PREAPP NO. 01-014 80-100 Blk Burnett Ave South . . NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN. THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre- application submittals made to the. City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment; Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. . WATER 1. There is an 8-inchand 24-inch water main in Burnett Ave S. There is a 24-inch water main in Tobin and a 6-inch water main in Williams Ave S. 2. 3. This project is within the CD zone, therefore the Water System Development Charge (SOC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.213 x the square footage of the site. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for all existing water connections. All new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm and must be located within 150 feet of the building. A hydrant is required for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow. Additional hydrants shall be located within 300 feet of the building. There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within the required distance to the nearest corner of the building. . . 4. Fire flow requirement has not been determined at this time. 5. Existing hydrants counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Stortz fitting. 6. The proposed project· is located in the 196 water pressure zone· and is outside Aquifer Protection Zone. Static pressure in the area is approximately 70psi 7. The building exceeds 30 feet in height. A backflow device will be required on the domestic water meters. A separate pluming permit will be required. ,. < 8. Fire sprinkler system is required. A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Civil plans show location of device and should note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required". For DDCVA installations inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe· has passed through the building floor slab .. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. 9. Landscape irrigation systems will require an approved backflow device to be installed. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Burnett Ave, an 8-inch sewer main in Tobin Ave S and an 8-inch sewer main in the alley in an easement. Relocation of the sewer main in the· alley may be necessary. . . 2. This project is within in the CD zone, therefore the Sewer System Development Charge (SDC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.126 x the square footage of the site. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: A re-development credit will apply for all existing sewer connections. 3. Underground parking is not proposed. If the' building department requires floor drains, they . shall be connected to the sanitary sewer through an approved oil/water separator located outside the building, if feasible. 4. Commercial food preparation facilities are proposed for this project. A grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit and plans will be required to be submitted . . SURFACE WATER 1. There are no storm drainage improvements in the area. 2. This project is within the CD zone, therefore the Surface Water System Development Charge (SDC) for multi-family will be assessed at a rate of $0.249 x the square footage of the site. This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. Note: Are-development credit will apply for all existing structures. 3. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required for the site plan application. Requirements shall be in compliance with the KCSWM (1990 edition). All core requirement and any special requirements shall be outlined in the report. 4. A SEPA condition will require this project to comply with Dept of Ecology's 2001 Stormwater Management Manual for Erosion Control. TRANSPORTATION 1. Traffic mitigation fees of $75 per additional generated trips shall be assessed per unit at a rate per the ITE manual. These are payable at the time the building permit is issued. Credit will be applied for fees previously paid. 2 2. Full street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, and storm drain will be required if not already in place. 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance. If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. A permit to cut and cap existing utilities on site will be required as part of the demolition permit. .. )( Any eXisting septic systems found on site, will be required to be abandoned in accordance with King County Department of Health. Certification will be required. 3. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. When approval is granted and. utility plans are complete, please submit permit application, three (3) copies of drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. A fee worksheet is attached for your use, but prior to preparing a check, it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application . .... , 3 " ' DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Applicant: Project Name: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM March 25, 2004 Pre-Application File No. 04-032 Jason E. JOrda~25) 430-7219 Merrill Gardens Senior Housing Pre-application Comments Steve Johnston, Curtis Beattie & Associates Architects Merrill Gardens Senior Housing Project Address: East of Burnett Avenue S and north of South 2nd Street General: We have completed a preliminary review of the preapplication materials for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the preapplication submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and on the Codes in effect on the date of the review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code and the City of Renton Development Regulations. The Renton Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's office and the Renton Public Library. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00, plus tax, from the Fihance Division on the first floor of Renton City Hall. Project Proposal: The project proponent wishes to construct a 147 unit senior housing project, which would include four stores over a Type I (concrete) level and provide 80 surface parking stalls. The building is proposed to contain a drop off area along Burnett Avenue South, while parking access is proposed from an alley easement. The parking is proposed to be located behind the structure and on an adjacent parcel. The site is located north on South 2nd Street between Burnett Avenue South and Williams Avenue South. Zoning: The subject site is zoned Center Downtown (CD). Retirement residences are outright permitted uses within the CD zone, provided they are not located within the Downtown Pedestrian District, which this proposal is not. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM March 25, 2004 Page 2 Development standards: The site is located within the Downtown Core Area. which is an overlay zone exempting development from parking. most setbacks. lot coverage and landscape requirements of the CD zone. . Design Guidelines -The site is located within the Urban Center Design Overlay District, Area A. The standards and guidelines specified within these regulations are applicable to the proposed retirement residence. For your use and review, I have attached a copy of the City's Urban Center Design Guidelines. Please note that some of the guidelines are mandatory (shall) and some are simply encouraged (should). In addition, the guidelines require specific parking lot location, pedestrian connections, landscaping and building articulation and roof modulation, which would need to be incorporated into the site plan and building. Please refer to Economic Development and Strategic Planning's comments regarding the proposal in relation to the City's Design Guidelines. Density: Based on a telephone conversation with the project architect, it appears that each unit would contain a kitchen, with full cooking facilities. Therefore, the projectwill be subject to the density limitations of the CD zone. The CD zones allows us to 100 . dwelling units per acre or up to 150 dwelling units per acre with a Conditional Use f . Permit. In this case, the proposed 147 unit building would generate 78.19 dwelling units .. ~dc /' I t1 per acre (147/1.88 gross project acres = 78.19 du/a), which is below the maximum· ~-~(:..; -sY 1M allowed within the CD zone. . .. ~PI' ~o--l J.&0 Setbacks: The project would be subject to a~ front yard and side yard along a fQ.o street setback of 15 feet for the first 25 feet (building height). Any portion of the building taller than 25 feet is not subject to a maximum front and/or side yard setback requirements. There are no other setback reqUirements. The project appears to be in compliance with the required setbacks. Height The maximum building height permitted within the CD zone is 95 feet. While· elevations were not provided, staff expects that the proposed four-story structure would comply with the height limitations of the CD zone. Parking: Although the subject site is in the Downtown Core Area and exempt from parking requirements, parking needs would be evaluated in the SEPAenvironmental review process. The City's Economic Development and Strategic Planning Department is preparing a code amendment that would e.liminate the parking exempt status of the Downtown Core Area within the next month. With the eliminating of that portion of the code, senior housing would be required to provide one parking stall per unit. The pre-application narrative notes the request to provide an overall parking ratio of 0.5 per unit. At this time, staff is not in support of reducing the parking ratio to that level; however, ·as . part of the formal land use application you may elect to ask for a parking modification. I would strongly encourage you to provide adequate documentation to support any reduction inthe required parking. All parking areas are required to be paved and meet the City's parking stall dimension requirements. Standards parking stall sizes for surface parking are as follows: a ninety degree parking stall shall be a minimum of 22 feet in length; forty-five degrees or greater stalls shall be a rTlinimum of 20 feet in length; and, each parallel stall shall be 23 feet by , > CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM March 25, 2004 Page 3 nine feet (23' X 9') in size. Minimum stall width for all other stalls shall be nine feet. Compact parking stalls shall be a minimum of eight feet, six inches (8'6") in width and a minimum of sixteen feet (16') in length. Compact stalls shall not exceed 30% of the required parking standards. . Standards parking stall sizes for structured parking are as follows: a ninety degree parking stall shall be a minimum of fifteen feet (15') in length; forty-five degrees or .. greater stalls shall be a minimum of sixteen feet (16') in length; and, each parallel stall shall be twenty-three feet by nine feet (23' X 9') in size .. Minimum stall width for all other stalls shall be eight feet, four inches (8'4"). Structured parking is allowed to have a maximum of 50 percent of the total number of stalls be deSigned at compact parking stall dimensions. Compact parking stalls shall be a minimum of seven feet, six inches (7'6") in width. A compact parking stall shall be a minimum of twelve feet (12') in length, measured along both sides for stalls designed at less than forty-five degrees. A compact stall length shall be a minimum of thirteen feet (13') in length, for stalls designed at forty~five degrees or greater. Street/Alley Vacation. At this time, staff is generally in support ofthe proposed alley vacation and new "alley" easement. Please note, that you will be required to submit for . a right-of-way vacation request that will require City Council approval. Karen McFarland, with the City's Property Service Section would process the right-of-way vacation request and she can be contacted at (425) 430-7209. Land Use Permits Required: The proposed senior housing complex is classified as a permitted use within the CD zoning designation. The proposal would require SEPA environmental review and site plan review. The proposal meets several thresholds that trigger Hearing Examiner site plan review, such as: the project exceeds 100 units and is greater than four stories in height. SEPA environmental review would be conducted first and a public hearing for the site plan review would be held following the SEPA appeal period. The land use review and environmental (SEPA) review and approval process takes approximately 12 to 16·weeks, from the time the. application is accepted as complete until the Hearing EXailiiner issues a decision and .the appeal period is complete. The City's fees will be $2,000 for the Hearing ExaminerSite Plan Review, $500 for Environmental Review and $.37 per mailing label. If appeals are filed, or additional information is needed to process the application, the process can be extended. cc: Jennifer Henning ! CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: STAFF CONTACfD: SUBJECT: March 24, 2004 Jason Jordan (I/!t6U' Reoecca Lind Don Erickson Merrill Gardens Senior Housing Project, 80-100 Block, Burnett Avenue S;PRE 04-032 The applicant is proposing to develop 140 to 150 market rate senior housing apartment units with common dining facilities, living room, library, exercise and activity roOIns and accessory parking on the former McLendon Hardware site. Approximately 30 spaces would be provided at grade off the existing alley in a semi-open garage where cars back into the alley. Another ± 50 spaces would be provided at-grade in a temporary surface parking lot accessed off of Williams Avenue S. The applicant is also requesting a reduction in the proposed off-street parking ratio, from 1.0 stall per uhit to 0.5 stalls per unit. The site is located east of Burnett Avenue S, north of the current McLendon parking lot on 2nd Avenue S, south of Tobin Street and west of the'alley between Williams Avenue S and Burnett Avenue S. The proposed building would be four stories of wood construction over a one-story concrete base. The applicant is also requesting that they be allowed to have residential uses at- grade on the fIrst floor within the Type I portion of the building. The site is designated Center Downtown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned CD, Center Downtown. It is also located in the Urban Center Design Overlay District. Relevant land use policies and overlay district standards are attached. . Analysis: Clearly the subject proposal satisfIes Policy DT-3 in that it does achieve urban density and intensity of uses. The addition of another 140 to 150 apartment units should continue to help revitalize the downtown core. Assuming future rentals are market rate there should be a spin-off effect for local restaurants and services (Policy DT-S). The applicant is proposing large areas of surface parking in conflict with Policy DT-21, but note that this is intended to only be an interim solution until sl.lch time a second phase of development occurs on the other side ofthe alley. Even on an interim basis (this could be a number of years) parking landscaping and screening standards will still need to apply until structured parking is provided (Policy DT-29). Pedestrian circulation to and from other uses downtown as well as to the Cedar River trial and Senior Center will also be important for this proposed use (Policy DT-42 and Policy DT-43). It is not possible at this time to respond to issues related to building design since no elevations or sections have been provided (Policy DT-48). Staff has reviewed the preliminary site plan with residential units at street level on Burnett Avenue S and believes that this is consistent with the intent of the Urban Center Design Overlay District e.g. having ground related units connected to the street. In terms of Policy DT-54 regarding downtown development, and especialiy residential. J ... ( Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre 03/24/2004 2 the project should be designed to take advantage of existing amenities such as the Cedar River, parks and trails. We have discussed this with the applicant and they believe that this one of the. main attributes of the site. fu regards to the Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines the building would appear to meet the intent of the siting criteria in that the proposed building is oriented to the street with clear connections to it. The northern half of the building fronting on Burnett Avenue S would have individual residential units fronting on the street with individual entries (4.3.100D.3.a). There also will be a primary entrance further south with a drop-off, pick-up area and building lobby (4-4- lOOD.3d.). The applicant will need to highlight this entry with clearly marked canopies, architectural elements, and other features. Consideration should be given to stepping down the north end of the building to create a transition to lower density existing neighborhood to the north (4-3-100DA.a.). fu regards to off-street parking the proposal appears to comply with the minimum standard relating to the location of parking for their permanent parking in that it is located off the alley and under the building above it i.e. it is not located between the building and the front property line. Staff, however, preferred the applicant's earlier proposal where the parking was enclosed in a garage. This would provide better security for tenant's vehicles and reduce potential conflicts with neighboring properties. Access to the garage could be provided from the alley if the building is shifted forward on the site to allow a drive aisle within the garage. However, surface parking is not supported as it does not conform to Policies DT -21and DT -29 and . the objectives of the Urban Center-Downtown. fu addition, the temporary sufface parking lot to the southeast does not conform to standards for the location of parking because the lot occurs at the front of the property between the building and the front property line. Because this lot is proposed as a temporary lot there is no assurance that it will be replaced on site by a permanent parking structure. The size of the parcel will mitigate against provision of a future parking garage plus additional development on the site. A more preferred off site parking solution would be to lease' required off-street spaces in the City's new 570-space parking garage on the south side of South 2nd Street. Recommendation: Support this preliminary proposal for a senior housing project of 140 to 150 units on the west side of the block with the' understanding that this project is still conceptual, and has not been reviewed in detail in terms of the Urban Center Design Overlay District guidelines since full drawings including elevations, landscaping plan, etc. were not provided at this early stage. Do not support a relaxation of the proposed off-street parking requirement of one space per unit and do not support the proposed temporary surface parking lot for the reasons noted above. Attachment cc: Don Erickson H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Deve!opment Review\Preapps\Comments\CD\Merrill Gardens Sr Housing.doc\cor Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre 03/2412004 Relevant Comprehensive Plan Downtown Land Use Policies: 3 Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. Policy DT -5. Redevelopment of the downtown area should be encouraged to maintain and revitalize the downtown core. Policy DT-21. Discourage uses in downtown that require large areas of surface parking. Policy DT-29. Parking should be structured whenever feasible and serve more than one use. Policy DT-30. The existing supply of parking should be better managed to encourage joint use rather than parking for each individual business. Policy DT -42. Pedestrian spaces should be emphasized and connected throughout the downtown, Policy DT -43. Pedestrians should be given exclusive use of sidewalks within designated pedestrian areas. Policy DT-48. Site and building designs (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and setback; landscaping; parking) should reflect unity of design to create a distinct sense of place and mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent uses. . Policy DT -54. Downtown development, especially residential, should be designed to take advantage of existing amenities such as the Cedar River, city parks and trails. Relevant Urban Center Design Overlay District Guidelines: D. Site Design and Building Location Intent: To ensure that buildings are located in relation to streets and other buildings so that the Vision of the City of Renton. can be realized for a high-density urban environment; so that businesses enjoy visibility from public rights-of-way; and to encourage pedestrian activity throughout the district. 4-3-100D.2.a. Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. 4-3-100D.3.a. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facrade facing a street. Such entrances shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human scale elements. 4-3-100D.3.d. Entries from the street should be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping. For projects that include residential uses, entries should provide transition space between the public street and the private residence such as a porch, landscaped area, terrace, common area, lobby, or similar feature. 4-3-100D.4.a. To shape redevelopment project so that the character and value of Renton's long established, existing neighborhoods are preserved. Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Development Review\Preapps\Comments\CD\Merrill Gardens Sr Housing.doc\cor '." .' Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre 03/24/2004 E. Parking Access and Pedestrian Circulation Location of Parking: 4 Intent: To maintain active pedestrian environments along streets by placing parking lots primarily in back of buildings. 4·3·100E.1.a. No surface parking shall be located between a building and the front property line or the street side yard of a comer lot. A drop-off zone atthe street edge may be pennitted. Design of Surface Parking: Intent: To ensure safety of users of parking areas, convenience to businesses, and reduce the impact of parking lots where possible. 4·3·100E.2.a.i. Parking lot lighting shall not spill onto adjacent or abutting properties. 4·3·100E.2.a.ii. Surface parking lots (District A) shall be screened with both evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs or walls to reduce visual impact. H:\EDNSP\Interdepartmental\Development Review\Preapps\Comrnents\CD\Merrill Gardens Sr Housing.doc\cor " CITY or AENrON ·R feE IV E 0 .MAR 1 5 ~aD~ BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM '* DATE: TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner . . FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: Meet4 u...-GAl?!JeNs. seN (orv . f1)JS I 1'J(c; -f L/7 ' I) AI rrs LOCATION: <lO-I(£) f2LJ.: OFglJlZN6J7 M&s·· .' PREAPP NO. PRe04:-o32 A meeting with the appliC?lnt has been scheduled for ;Z":a? rH . ,Thursday, . t0f/t?(!1i 2. 5 -{7.:. , in 'one of the 6111 floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, tne MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11 :00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 AM meeting .. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only maJor issues that must be resolved priorto formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. ' Plan Reviewer assigned is .. ~(}yiI\ .. . " . Please submit your written comments to :Ji1SON (Planner) at least two (2) da.rs before the· meeting. Thank you. .1-. (' . . /7 . 'J/L~,~~ 311r< ~ Tfu-~---.r. 5 ~~/"jJ~ ~~~fo~ - .A _ ..A __ ~ :;::(j~~ ,A4 0----3 v-........... -7-. / . ~ . . 12. __ ~ /~~~~:--.. .. ~. ~~cf~~-,,· ~'..4~~.~.~.~~ ~~¥~~~.~ M~/1ItJ ':/;.rOt./ ~ . I-H:\Divjsi~n,s\Develop,ser\Dev & Plan.ing\Template\Preapp2 . 3/;:V'C cJ t;,t: Revised 9100 ' ) \ ) osv~ TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT C1f?f1i?s, . o~~,o~ ..I(jll' ~JVrO~IltI;v. 'rt ?J. 'v G FOR ~~~~ <oo~ '!P/~~ MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON ·CENTRE June 11,2004 PREPARED FOR: Friedman Development, LLC P.O. Box 1018 Mercer Island, W A 98040 PREPARED BY Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc 750 Sixth Street South Kirldand, WA 98033 Phone: 425.,827-2014 Fax: 425-827-5043 ) TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE June 11, 2004 PREPARED FOR: . Friedman Development, LLC P.O. Box 1018 Mercer Island, W A 98040 PREPARED BY Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland, WA 98033 Phone: 425-827-2014 Fax: 425~827-5043 Menill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11,2004 Table of Contents Section 1 Project Overview .. : .................................. ; ....................... ~ ................... , ........ 1 1.1 General. Description ................................................................ ;................... 1 1.2 Existing Conditions ............................................................................ ~ ........ 2 Figure 1 -Vicinity Map Figure 2 -Downstream Drainage! Vicinity Map Section 2 . Conditions and Requirements Summary ....................... l ................................. 3 2.1 Core Requirements ....................................................................................... 3 2. L 1 Core Requirement # l ................................................. :.~ ............ : ... 3 . 2.1.2 Core Requirement #2 ..... ; ............................................................. 4 2.1.3 Core Requirement #3 ................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Core Requirement #4 ................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Core Requirement #5 ............................................... ; ............ ; ...... 4 2.1.6 Core Requirement #6 .................................................................... 4 2.1.7 Core Requirement #7 ............................................ ; ...................... 5 2.2 Special Requirements .................................................................................... 5 Section 3 Off site Analysis .............................................................................................. 7 3.1 Offsite Analysis .......................................................................................... "7 Section 4 RunoffControl. ................................................................................. , ............ 12 4.1 Flow Control ........................................ : .................................................... 12 4.2 Water Quality .............................................. ·.~ ............ c .................. r ............ 12 Section 5 Conveyance System Analysis and Design ................................................... 13 Section 6 Erosion and Sediment ControL ................................................................... 14 6.1 Temporary Erosion and Sediment ControL ............................................... 14 6.1.1 Clearing Limits ............................................ ~ ............................. 14 6.1.2 Cover Measures ......................................................... , ............... 14 6.1.3 Perimeter Prptection .................................................................. 14 6.1.4 Traffic Area Stabilization .......................................... , ................ 14 6.1.5 Sediment Retention ................................................. ~ ..... ~ ............... 14 6.l.6 Surface Water Control ............................................................... 14 62 Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control ................................................. 15 Section 7 Maintenance and Operations ....................................................................... 16 7.1 Operation and Maintenance.......................................................... 16 Section 8 Bonds and Liability ..................................................................................... 17 8.1 Bond Quantities ........................................ ; ............................................... 17 82 Facilities Summary .................................................................................... 17 8.3 Declaration of Covenant. ........................................................................... 17 Appendix TIR Worksheety Stormwater Facility Summary Shee~ Ex. & Developed Area Maps & Operations and Maintenance Manual Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technicallnfonnation Report Merrill Gardens at Renton Lentre June 11, 2004 Section 1 Project Overview 1.1 General De$cription The project is located at 104 Burnett Avenue South in Renton, Washington. The 1.88-acre site is currently the location of McClendon's Hardware. See vicinity map below. The site and the surrounding area is located in the Urban Center Design Overlay, District A, Downtown Conidor. The tax parcel numbers associated with the project site are 0007200156, 0007200154, 0007200104, 7231502030 and 7231502120 .. , \ '\ ,..-.\\. . . 02004 MapQuest.oom, lno.; 02004 NAVTEQ· Figure 1 -Vicinity Map 1 Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical Infonnation Report ) Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June Ii, 2004 ~.~ r--:-"Iii ; ''/ '.; ' .. ' " .' . . The project involves construction of an approximately ISO-unit senior housing facility and associated parking. For more prqject information, see APpendix A, Technical Information Report Worksheet. 1:2 ExistingConditions The site is rectangular in shape with a length of approximately 550 feet and a width of approximately 115 feet. The site slopes generally from south to north with approximately 1-1/2 feet in fall. With the exception of a few planter beds apd strips, the site is paved and has three existing storage sheds. Approximately l.77-acres of the 1.88-acre site is covered with impervious surfaces (roofs, pavement). Penhal~egon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical Infonnation Report 2 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June II, 2004 Section 2 Conditions and Requirements Summary. 2.0 Drainage Review Types and Requirements The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) for surface water management and design: • The project is outside of any sensitive areas according to King County I-Map • The site is located in an area that makes it susceptible to groundwater contamination (medium to high risk) in: accordance with King County I -Map. • The proposed project does not add any impervious surfaces onsite. The area of . impervious surfaces is reduced by approximately 300-sf. • The project adds approximately 3,800 of new contiguous PGIS to the project site. • The site is not a high-use site. . Per Section 1.1.1. of the KCSWDM, the project requires Drainage Review since it collects and conceIJ.trates surface and storm water runoff from a drainage area of more than 5,000-sf. Thus, the applicant must demonstrate that· the proposed project complies with the following Core Requirements: • Core Requirement # 1: Discharge at Natural Location • Core Requirement #2: Offsite Analysis • Core Requirement #2: Runoff Control • Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System • Core Requirement #5: Erosion and Sediment Control • Core Requirement #6: Maintenance and Operations • Core Requirement #7: Bonds and Liability Further addressed will be Special Requirements. 2.1 Core Requirements 2.1.1 Core Requirement #1: Discharge at Natural LocatiQn Requirement: The discharge from a proposed project must occur at the natural location. The proposed project will discharge stormwater runoff at the Natural Location. The project is furthermore not located within a Landslide Hazard Drainage Area, nor is it adjacent to or containing Sensitive Areas such as Wetland, Landslide, Coal Mine, Seismic or Erosion hazard Sensitive Area Ordinance (SAO) areas. 3 Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical Information Report Merrill Gardens. at Renton Centre June 11, 2004 2.1.2 Core Requirement #2: Offsite Analysis Requirement: All proposed projects must identify the upstream tributary drainage area and a downstream analysis. Levels of analysis required depend on the problems identified or predicted. At a minimum, a Levell analysis must be submitted with the initial permit application. See Section 3 for an Off site Analysis for the proposed project area. 2.1.3 Core Requirement #3: Runoff Control Requirement: Proposed projects must provide runoff controls to limit the developed conditions peak rates of runoff to the pre-development peak rates for specific design storm events based on the proposed project site existing runoff conditions, and install biofiltration measures. Flow control will not be proposed for this project. The improvements do not add greater than 5,QOO-square feet of new impervious surfaces to the site (Negligible Peak Runoff Rate Increase Exemption, 1.2.3-5). The impervious surfaces under proposed conditions will be approximately 300-sf less than under existing conditions. The total proposed impervious area is 1.50 acres. Biofiltration facilities are not proposed since the project adds less than 5,000-sf of new pollution generating impervious surface (POlS) to the site. The cievelopment oniy adds approximateiy 3,800 of new contiguous PGIS to the project site 2.1.4 Core Requirement #4: Conveyance System Requirement: All conveyance systems for proposed projects must be analyzed, designed and constructed for existing tributary off-site runoff and developed on-site runoff from the proposed project. New pipe systems will be analyzed and designed to have sufficient capacity to convey and contain the 25-year peak flow, assuming developed con<litions for onsite tributary areas. New pipe systems will also be designed to accommodate runoff 1:I1at will be contributed by offsite areas east off the site that will drain towards the new onsite drainage system. 2.1.5 Core Requirement #5: Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement: All engineering plans for proposed projects that propose to construct new, or modifY existing drainage facilities, must include a plan to install measures to control erosion and sedimentation during construction and to permanently stabilize soil exposed during construction. Erosion and Sediment· Control measures will be implemented. See Section 5 for discussion regarding Erosion and Sediment Control measures. 2.1.6 Core Requirement #6: Maintenance and Operations Requirement: Maintenance and operation of all drainage facilities constructed or modified by a proposed project is the responsibility of the property owners (see Maintenance Requirements for Privately Maintained Drainage Facilities in Appendix AJ, except City of Renton may assume . maintenance of drainage facilities where granted an easement, tract, or right-of-way and officially assumes maintenance and operation.· Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical Information Report 4 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre lune 11; 2004 The Property OwnerlDeveloper will maintain the onsite <!rainage facilities. The stormwater facilities located on the site will be incorporated in a maintenance ease,nent (Declaration of Covenant) that will be recorded upon final approval of the conveyance facilities if required. See Appendix, Operation and Maintenance Manual, for more maintenance and operation requirements. The City of· Renton will assume maintenance responsibility for storm improvements constructed in public right-of-ways or easementS. 2.1.7 Core Requirement #7: Bonds and Liability Requirement: All drainage facilities for proposed projects (except drainage stub-out connections, downspout roof drain infiltration systems and downspout dispersion systems for single-family residential lots) must be constructed in conformance with the bond and liability requirements of City of Renton. ' The Developer will meet bonds and liability requirements. See also Section 7. 2.2 Special Requirements 2.2.1 Special Requirement #1: Critical Drainage Areas Not applicable -project not know to be within Critical Drainage Area 2.2.2 Special Requirement #2: Compliance with an Existing Master Drainage Plan Not applicable -project is not included in existing Master Drainage Plan 2.2.3 Special Requirement #3: Conditions Requiring a Master Drainage Plan Not applicable -project does not meet the minimum requirements to trigger Master Drainage Plan 2.2.4 Special Requirement #4: Adopted Basin or Community Plans Not applicable -Project is not know to lie within an area with an adopted Basin or Community Plan 2.2.5 Special Requirement #5: Special Water Quality Controls Not applicable -project does not meet the minimum I-acre threshold to require special water quality controls per the 1990 KCSWDM. Furthermore, the project does not meet the City of Renton 5,000-sf threshold· for mandating water quality treatment. The project adds only approximately 3,800 of new contiguous PGIS to the project site, 2.2.6 Special Requirement #6: Coalescing Plate Oil! Water Separators Not applicable -the proposed project (1.61 acres) does not meet minimum 5-acre threshold for triggering oil control. 2.2.7 Special Requirement #7: Closed Depression Not applicable -the proposed project does not discharge into any closed depression. 2.2.8 Special Requirement #8: Use of Lakes, Wetlands or closed Depressions for Peak Rate Runoff Control Not applicable -the project does not propose runoff control and furthermore does not discharge runoff into a lake, wetland or closed depression. 5 Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Teclmical Infonnation Report Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June II, 2004 2.2.9 Specia. Requirement #9: Delineation of 100-Ye~r Floodplain Not applicable -the proposed project does not contain or. abut a stream, lake, wetland or closed depression and is not located within the IOO-Year Floodplain .. 2.2.10 Special Requirement #10: Flood Protection Facilities for Type 1 and 2 Streams Not applicable -project does not abut a Type 1 or Type 2 stream. . 2.2.11 Special Requirement #11: Geotechnical Analysis and Report Not applicable -the project does not propose to install a pond or infiltration facility and does not modify a flood protection facility. 2.2.12 Special Requirement #12: Soils Analysis and Report Not required since the soils in the area have been mapped. However, it is expected that the Developer will provide a Geotechnical and Soils Analysis and Report as is customary for such projecL Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Teclmical Information Report 6 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June Ii, 2004 Section 3 Offsite Analysis 3.1 Offsite Analysis Tas~ 1. Study Area Dermition and Maps Forthe-''"llurposes of task 2 below, the study area shall extend 1 mile downstream bfllie proposed project discharge location. There is no offsite drajnage area tributary to this project site, so the upstream area is excluded from this analysis. For purposes of tasks 3, 4, and 5, the study area shall extend downstream to a point on the drainage system where the proposed project site constitutes a minimum of 15% of the total tributary drainage area, but not less than Y-t mile. This project will not produce backwater effects upstream of the site, and therefore the upstream area was excluded from this analysis. Refer to Figure 2, Downstream DrainagelVicinity Map. Task 2. Resource Review A resource review was conducted to determine potential problems downstream ofthe project Site. The following is a list of references used in gathering information for the downstream analysis. • King County !MAP Sensitive Areas Map • USGS Map . • Topographic Survey by PenhalIegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated June 2004 7 Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical Information Report ) Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11,2004 Figure 2-Downstream DrainageNicinity Map Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical Information Report 8 · Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11, 2004 Task 3. Field Inspection A level 1 field inspection was conducted on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 at approximately 1:00 pm. The weather was sunny and approximately 65 degrees Fahrenheit. A minor amount of precipitation had fallen within the previous 24 hours. Task 4. Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions Drainage from the site will be conveyed to the 8" public storm drain (PSD) located along the centerline of Burnett Avenue South and the 8" public storm drain located along the east side of Williams Avenue South. The 8" PSD on Burnett Avenue South directs flow north from MH #1 (at the southwest comer of site) approximately 660 feet to MH # 2 (located about 110 feet north of South Tobin Street. From MH #2, an 8" PSD directs flow east approximately 280 feet to MH #4 (located at Williams Avenue South). The 8" PSD on Williams Avenue South directs flow north from MH #3 (at the southeast comer of site) approximately 710 feet to MH # 4. From MH #4, a 12" PSD directs flow north approximately 90 feet and discharges into the Cedar River. The point of discharge is approximately 0.15 to 0.20 miles downstream of the site. Refer to included photographs of vicinity ofMH #4 and the outfall. No current or recent drainage complaints were found by researching the King County lMAP Sensitive Areas Map web site. Task 5. Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems No existing or potential problems were identified in the resource review or field inspection. The project is not expected to negatively affect the downstream system since peak runoff rates and durations are expected to remain essentially constant .. The total area of impervious surfaces under both existing and proposed conditions is approximately 1.50-acres. 9 Penhallegon Associates Consulting EngineerS Technical Infonnation Report Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11, 2004 Photo # 1 -Vicinity of MH #4 looking north Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical Infonnation Report 10 '\ ) Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11, 2004 11 Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical Infonnation Report Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11, 2004 Section 4 Runoff Control 4.1 Flow Control As has been determined in Part 2 of this report, the proposed project qualifies for the 5,000-sf area exemption and is not subject to flow control analysis and design. The total area of . impervious surfaces onsite remains fairly constant at l.77-acres and actually decreases by roughly 300-5f. 4.2 Biofiltration The project is exempt from biofiltration/water quality requirements since it proposes to add less than 5,000-sf of new POlS as part of the development. . Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Teclmical Information Report I u Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11, 2004 Section 5 Conveyance System Analysis ,and Design 5.1 Conveyance Design New pipe systems have been analyzed and designed to have sufficient capacity to convey and contain the 25-year peak flow, assuming developed conditions for onsite tributary areas. New pipe systems will also be designed to accommodate runoff that will be contributed by offsite areas east off the site that will drain towards the new onsite drainage system. Conveyance capacity for the systems was sized using the conservative Rational Method to calculate peak flows within each catch basin sub-basin. 13 Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Technical" Infonnation Report Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11, 2004 Section 6 Erosion and Sediment Control 6.1 Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control 1- A temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) plan will be developed for the site in order to minimize the suspension of sediment into surface water, and to prevent sediment-laden water from leaving the site. The main aspects of this plan are outlined as follows: 6.1.1 Clearing Limits Clearing limits shall be installed prior to the clearing and/or grading of the site. Clearing limits shall be delineated using filter fabric fence (where indicated) in combination with survey flagging. Clearing limits shall be maintained throughout the duration of the project. 6.1.2 Cover Measures Cover measures shall be provided to protect areas cleared or graded for the project that are left unworked for more than two days. Cover materials will be plastic sheeting or mulching. Any area unworked for more than 30 days will be seeded. 6.1.3 Perimeter Protection Filter fabric fence will be installed downslope of disturbed areas, and will be installed prior to upslope grading. 6.1.4 Traffic Area Stabilization The existing asphalt entrances will be utilized as the construction entrance. 6.1.5 Sediment Retention Perimeter protection with filter fabric fence will be provided downslope of all disturbed areas and will be installed prior to upslope grading. In addition, storm drain inlet protection will be provided for all stonn drain inlets downslope of the disturbed areas. Taking into account that the existing conveyance system flows to a sedimentation pond, the measures noted above are considered adequate to meet the required sediment retention standards. 6.1.6 Surface Water Control Surface water controls have not been proposed for this project. The site is graded and paved to provide adequate surface water controls for the project. In addition to the above requirements, all construction debris will promptly be removed from the site to minimize demolition. and construction impacts on the site. The contractor shall implement additional Best Management Practices as required and/or recommended by the King County inspector and as approved and/or required by other. agencies as required during construction to prevent construction debris, waste, material, fuel, oi~ lubricants, and other fluids from entering the public right of way and existing storm conveyance systems. Penhallegon Associates ConsulWig Engineers Technical Infonnation Report 14 Merrill Gardens at Renton Lentre June 11, 2004 6.2 Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control The new building or new pavement will permanently cover all areas disturbed during construction. 15 Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers Teclmical· Information Report Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre June 11,2004 . Section 7 Maintenance and Operations 7.1 Operations and Maintenance Appendix A "Maintenance Standards for Privately Maintained Drainage Facilities" from the 1998 KCSWDM has been included as the operations and maintenance manual for the drainage facilities proposed for this site (see Appendix C). Penhallegon Associates ConSulting Engineers Technical Information Report 16 Merrill GardenS at Renton Centre June 11, 2004 Section 7 Bonds and Liability 7.1 Bond Quantities A completed Bond Quantity Worksheet (BQW) will be completed upon preliminary approval· of the site work design. 7. 2 Facility Summaries A Facility Summary Sheet is included in Appendix A. 7.3 Declaration of Coven ant Not applicable at this time. A completed Declaration of Covenant will be submitted upon approval of the site work design. 17 Penhallegon Associates Conslilting Engineers Technical'fufonnation Report ) APPENDIX·· Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet Stormwater Facility Summary Sheet Existing & Developed Area Maps Operations and Maintenance Manual Figure 1. TIR Worksheet King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Project Owner Friedman Development Address P.O. Box 1018 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Phone 206-232-8330 Project Engineer Jeff Brown, P .E. Company PACE Engineers Phone 425-827 -2014 Community Renton, Washington Drainage Basin . River N/A Cedar River Drainage Basin Stream _. _-'-N.!!./A'-'--________ _ Critical Stream Reach N/A Depressions/Swales N/A Lake N/A Project Name Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Location Township ---,,2=3:....!N.!-__ Range _-!:!:5~E=--__ _ Section _-..:.1.::..8 __ _ Project Size 1.88 acres Upstream Drainage Basin Size N/A Floodplain N/A Wetlands N/A Seeps/Springs High Groundwater Table N/A Groundwater Recharge N/A Other Figure 1 - cont. TIR Worksheet Steep Slopes ________ _ Soil Type Slopes Additional Sheets Attached REFERENCE Additional Sheets Attached . MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION X Perimeter Runoff Control X Clearing and Grading Restrictions X Cover Practices X Construction Sequence Other Erosion Potential . Erosive Velocities LIMIT ATION/SITE CONSTRAINT MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION X Stabilize Exposed Surface X RemoveTemporary ESC Facilities X Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris X Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Other Figure 1 -cont. TIR Worksheet Grass Lined Method of Analysis Channel Energy Dissapator Depression X Pipe System Wetland Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation Open Channel Stream of Eliminated Site Waiver Storage Dry Pond Regional Wet Pond Detention Brief Description of System Operation: Facility Related Site Umitations Reference Facility Limitation Core Reg. #4 Conveyance Design for 25-year peak flow Rockery > 4' High Structural on Steep Slope Other Access Easement Native Growth Protection Easement Tract Other , . lor a civil engineer under my supervision has visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. . KING COUl'o L Y, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER l.J~SIGN MANUAL STORMW ATER FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET Development Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Date 6/11104 Location Renton, W A ENGINEER DEVELOPER Name Jeff Brown, P.E. Name Steve Friedman Finn Penhallegon Associates Consulting Finn Friedman Development, LLC Engineers Address 750 6th Street South Address P.O. Box 1018 Kirkland, WA 98033 Mercer Island, W A 98040 Phone 425-827-2014 Phone 206-232-8330 Developed Site: Acres_::..::1...::;.8.=.,.8 __ _ Number oflots 5 -=------ Number of detention facilities on site: Number of infiltration facilities on site: __ 0_ ponds _0_ ponds o vaults 0 vaults -----o tanks 0 tanks ------Flow control provided in regional facility (give location) N/A No flow control required -:X~ _____ Exemption number _--..;.#'-'1=--___ _ Downstream Drainage Basins Immediate Basin A Cedar River Basin B Basin C Basin D Number & type of water quality facilities on site: __ biofiltration swale (regular) ___ sand filter, linear (basic or large?) ___ combined detentionIWQ pond --- (WQ portion basic or large?) combined detentionlwetvault ___ compost filter ___ filter strip ___ flow dispersion ___ farm management plan ___ landscape management plan Major Basin Cedar River ___ sand filter (basic or large?)) ___ sand filter vault (basic or large?) stonnwater wetland ---___ wetpond (basic or large?) wetvault --- ___ oil/water separator (baffle or coalescing plate?) catch basin inserts: Manufacturer ------------------------------- ___ pre-settling pond ___ pre-settling structure: Manufacturer ~~--~----~~~----------------___ flow-splitter catchbasin 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 1 /' 9/1/98 I KING COUNTY, Wi"_"HNGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN ... ANUAL DESIGN INFORMATION INDNIDUAL BASIN A B C D : Water Quality design flow N/A Water Quality treated volume or N/A wetpond Vr DESIGN TOTAL INDNIDUAL BASIN INFORMATION, cont'd Drainage basin( s) A B' C D Onsite area Offsite area Type of Storage Facility Live Storage Volume Predeveloped Runoff Rate Developed runoff rate lO-year (Basin A) 25-year iType of restrictor Size of orifice/restriction , ' , FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET SKETCH All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must include a sketch per the following criteria: , 1. Heading for the drawings should be located at the top of the sketch (top right-hand comer). The heading should contain: • North arrow (point up or to left) , • Plat name or short plat number • Date drawn (or updated) • D9# • Address (nearest) • Thomas Brothers page, grid number 2. Label CBs and MRs with the plan and profile designation. Label the control structure in writing or abbreviate with C.S. Indicate which structures provide spill control.' 3. Pipes--indicate: 9/1/98 Pipe size Pipe length Flow direction , 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 2 KING COU~ _ {, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER u .... .iIGN MANUAL Use s single heavyweight line 4. Tanks--use a double, heavyweight line and indicate size (diameter) 5. Access roads • Outline the limits of the road • Fill the outline with dots if the road is gravel. . Label in writing if another surface. 6. Other Standard Symbols: • Bollards:.... • ••• • Rip rap 000000 . 000000 Fences --x---x---x---x---x,.--x--- • Ditches -l)'---<:l)'---<:Ir-'-<:D 7. Label trash racks in writing. 8. Label all streets with the actual street sign designation. If you don't know the actual street name, consult the plat map. 9. Include easements and lot lines or tract limits when possible. 10. Arrange all the labeling or writing to read from left to right or from bottom to top with reference to a properly oriented heading. 11. Indicate driveways or features that may impact access, maintenance or replacement. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 'n' t~! "Lh;~;;~ \~ ~i~\'~t ·"r~;j \ ~;'5.~!.. 'I '{NOli',.,.. ',)6,,,,,,,. 'IJOI;,;x 'lsl-OfpnlS-I!iJ(I-}J!m '1$1-~I4-}J8t-l!un-~" 'Irl-'PIJ'-}J8t-l/un-~ jSI-H8Z-/.Iun-~" 'ON-ISj-}J8/-/!Un-$1f ',sl->'~ ~"''11-f'I iu~-''';'' :S:l3HX LFtr:,., ,.oot I Nfl/' dJ !)MOSY3}JVI;,.;J: '~"M"O:d '~' 31'tU of 3!VO lD1d A8 031VOtin lJ"-' ____ --' OO'M.'."'>\I':!r./,(f ... + :'Il V~l'lj\" .. qf~ (:i.. '1 '~}}jI:).'.1 N~'\ ;1 , , " """ ( 'PUOII,.,.tl( 'jJ611'''''~ 'IJDI"".X 'lsl-O{pnlS-/IU{)-WYt 'ISI-Zpu~~H8,-llUn~N'Jn '1fI-IPU;-H81-/!un-l:/9" '1SI-~BZ-'!U{Hf.)n 'aN-ISl-~BI-l!un-~" 'IS/~"~'~" "(I-M91t 'MIS-I;"" :W}JX L/:;r:,., KJOZ tI Nfr dd 9MOW3WI,. •• d" ':~,.,.O ,.Ot! :d 3YiU 4' lLVO 101d .1..8 OllvOdn ,'-/,"',d<-____ -' ~ING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SURF, .c W'A TER DESIGN MANUAL APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR . PRIVATELY MAINTAINED DRAINAGE FACILITIES i NO.1 -INFILTRATION Maintenance Component General Storage Area Defect Trash & Debris Sediment Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Any trash and debris which exceed 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet (this is about equal to the amount of trash it would take to fill up one standard size office garbage can). In general, there should be no visual evidence of dumping. A percolation test pit or test of facility indicates facility is only working at 90% of its designed capabilities. If two inches or more sediment is present, remove. Results Expected When Maintenance Is Perfonned Trash and debris cleared from site. Sediment is removed and/or facility is cleaned so that infiltration system .works according to design.' Note: Sediment accumulation of more than .25 inches per year may indicate excessive erosion is occuning upstream of the facility or that conveyance systems are not being properly maintained. The contributing drainage area should be check.ed for erosion problems or . inadequate maintenance of conveyance systems if excessive sedimentation is noted in an infiltration facility. Check twice a year during first 2 years of operation; once a year thereafter. Clean manholes/catch basins, repair damaged inlets/out/ets, clean trash racks. . . NO.2 -CONTROL STRUCTUREIFLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Perfonned General Trash and Debris Distance between debris build-up and bottom of . All trash·and debris removed. (Includes Sediment) orifice plate is less than 1-1/2 feet. Structural Damage Structure is not securely attached to manhole wall . Structure securely attached to and outlet pipe structure should support at least wall and outlet pipe. 1,000 Ibs of up or down pressure. Structure is not in upnght position (allow up to Structure in correct position. 10% from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight and Connections to ouilet pipe are show signs of rust. water tight; . structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes-other than designed holes-in the Structure has no holes other structure. than designed holes. Cleanout Gate Damaged or Missing Cleanout gate is not watertight or is missing. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one Gate moves up and down easily maintenance person. and is watertight. Chain leading to gate is missing or damaged. Chain is in place and works as designed. Gate is rusted over 50% of its surface area. Gate is repaired or replaced to meet design standards .. Orifice Plate Damaged or Missing Control device is not working properly due to Plate is in place and works as missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. designed. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 A-I APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STAND. )S FOR PRlVATEL Y MAINTAINED DRAINAL /ACfLITIES Obstructions Overflow Pipe Obstructions NO.3 -CATCH BASINS Maintenance Component General 9/1/98 Defect Trash & Debris (Includes Sediment) Structure Damage to Frame and/or Top Slab Cracks in Basin Walls/ Bottom Sediment! Misalignment Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation blocking the plate. Any trash or debris blocking (or having the potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Trash or debris of more than 1/2 cubic foot which is located immediately in front of the catch basin opening or is blocking capacity of the basin by more than 10% Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe blocking more than 1/3 of its height. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate odors that could cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in volume Comer of frame extends more than 3/4 inch past curb face into the street (If applicable). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than 1/4 inch (intent is to make sure all material is running into basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 3 feet, any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks, or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wic:ler than 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any inlet! outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Basin has settled more than 1'inch or has rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. A-2 Plate is free of all obstructions and works as designed. Pipe is free olall obstructions . and, works as designed. Results Expected When Maintenance is performed No Trash or debris located immediately in front of catch basin opening. No trash or debris in the catch basin. Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or debris. No dead animals or vegetation present within the catch basin. No condition present which would attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Frame Is even with curb. Top slab is free of holes and cracks. ' Frame is Sitting flush on top slab. ' Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the joint of inlet!outlet pipe. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual APPENDIX A M. . fENANCE STANDARDS FOR PRIVATELY Ni. _~,fTAlNED DRAINAGE FACILITIES NO.3 -CATCH BASINS (CONTINUED) Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed . Results Expected When Component Maintenance is performed \ Fire Hazard Presence of chemicals such as natural gas, oil and No flammable chemicals gasoline. present Vegetation Vegetation g~wing across and blocking more than No vegetation blocking opening 10% of the basin opening. to basin. Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints that is No vegetation or root growth more than six inches tall and less than six Inches present. apart. Pollution Nonflammable chemicals of more than 1/2 cubic foot No pollution present other than per three feet of basin length. surface film. Catch Basin Cover Cover Not in Place Cover is miSSing or only partially in place. Any open Catch basin cover is closed catch basin requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by on maintenance Mechanism opens with proper Not Working person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have less tools. than 1/2 inch of thread. Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove lid after Cover can be removed by one Remove applying 80 Ibs. of lift; intent Is keep coverirom maintenance person. sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder Ladder Rungs Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment, Ladder meets design standards Unsafe rust, cracks, or sharp edges. and allows maintenance person safe access. Metal Grates Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Grate opening meets design (If Applicable) standards. Trash and Debris Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% of Grate free of trash and debris. grate surface . . Damaged or Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Grate is in place and meets Missing. design standards. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 A-3 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STANL JS FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED DRAINA i ACILITIES . NO.4 -CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (PIPES & DITCHES) Maintenance Component .. Pipes ) Open Ditches Catch Basins Debris Barriers (e.g., Trash Rack) Defect Sediment & Debris Vegetation Damaged Trash & Debris Sediment Vegetation Erosion Damage to Slopes Rock Lining Out of Place or Missing (If Applicable). Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the diameter of the pipe. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through pipes. Protective coating is damaged; rust is causing more than 50% deterioration to any part of pipe. Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Pipe cleaned of all sediment and debris. All vegetation removed so water flows freely through pipes. Pipe repaired or replaced. Any dent that decreases the cross section area of Pipe repaired or replaced. pipe by more than 20%. Trash and debris exceeds. 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20 % of the design depth. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through ditches. See "Ponds· Standard No.1 Maintenance person can see native soil beneath the rock lining. See "Catch Basins: Standard No.5 See "Debris Barriers" Standard No.6 Trash and debris cleared from ditches. Ditch cleaned! flushed of all sediment and debris so that it matches design. Water flows freely through ditches. See "Ponds" Standard No. 1 Replace rocks to design standards. See ·Catch Basins' Standard No.5 . See "Debris Barriers" Standard No.6 NO.5 -GROUNDS (LANDSCAPING) Maintenance Component . General- Trees and Shrubs 9/1/98 Defect Weeds (Nonpoisonous) Safety Hazard Trash or Litter Damaged Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Weeds growing in more than 20% of the landscaped area (trees and shrubs only). Any presence of poison ivy or other poisonous vegetation. Paper, cans, bottles, totaling more than 1 cubic foot within a landscaped area (trees and shrubs only) of 1,000 square feet. Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are split or broken which affect more than 25% of the total foliage of the tree or shrub. Trees or shrubs that have been blown down or knocked over. Trees or shrubs which are not adequately supported or are leaning over, causing exposure of the roots. A-4 Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Weeds pr~sent in less than 5% of the landscaped area. No poisonous vegetation present in landscaped area. Area clear of litter .. Trees and shrubs with less than 5% of total foliage with split or broken limbs. Tree or shrub in place free of injury. Tree or shrub in place and adequately supported; remove any dead or diseased trees. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual· APPENDIX A ~. NO.6 -WETVAULT +-Maintenance Component Wetvault Defect Trash! Debris Accumulation Sediment Accumulation in Vault Damaged Pipes Access Cover Damaged! Not Working Vault Structure Damaged Baffles Access Ladder Damage 1998 Surface Water Design Manual iTENANCE STANDARDS FOR PRIVATELY 1\_ .,\!TAINED DRAINAGE FACILITIES Condition When Maintenance is Needed Trash and debris accumulated in vault, pipe or inleV outlet, (includes floatables and non- f1oatables). Sediment accumulation in vault bottom that exceeds the depth of the sediment zone plus 6- inches: InieV outlet piping damaged or broken and in need of repair. Cover cannot be opened or removed, especially by one person. . Vault: Cracks wider than 1!2-inch and any evidence of soil particles entering the structure through the cracks, or maintenance! inspection personnel determines that the vault is not structurally sound. . . Baffles corroding, cracking, warping and! or showing signs of failure as determined by maintenance! inspection staff: . Ladder is corroded or deteriorated, not functioning properly, missing rungs, has cracks and! or misaligned. A-5 Results Expected When Maintenance is Performed Trash and debris removed from vault. Removal of sediment from vault. Pipe repaired and! or replaced. Pipe repaired or replaced to proper working specifications. No cracks wider than lI4-'inch at the joint of the inlet! outlet pipe. Vault is determined to be structurally sound. Repair or replace baffles to speCifications. Ladder replaced or repaired to speCifications, and is safe to use as determined by inspect/on personnel. 911198 -.-' (\J o .-::r -.-::r o a ex> C\ . , .......... ,dllnauPlll1Ol 00 47,· ...... ~~:' THIS SPACf PROVIOEII Iv" _feOIlO£I'S USE, Filed for Record at Request of ~ .•. ---:~;z;-.. :7. r,'--. '. ':;; s· .... ;'~I[! \ \ i:?ti 1 _ 198C I "~-'~~~~~~/ Addresa ... " .. ~ .•. o., .... S.Q~ ... ll!Ul .......... " ... , ............................. , ... " ....... .. City and State." .. s.e.~,t.t.le ...... w.a .•.. "2.al.l.l. ...... " ... " ... " ........ ,, ...... .. Attn. Conunercial Loan Dept. (eh) : . ! :ffI :.---mm---m----.. f-dY-9a2~ ry~ Statutory WammtyDeed . f'. ' '} '1,',.-,,; .... THE GRANTORS, PHILIP M. LANDE and PATRICIA M. LAUDt, his wife -',>: '.' ":' ~(C(;,),) 1/,j ,I .• " __ .' 4":J:-',' f. .• ", rf/:rlJ. < ''':: ;. ,,;.~'.',t' vc/(s, v41fil' t:'c'!""of, tJt . ~ ttl' for and In consideration of TEN AND ~O/100 * * * in band paid, conveys and warrants to McLENDON HARDWARE, I Ne. the followinl described rmI estate, r.ituated in the County of WashiDgtoa : King * . * , State of lots 16 and 17. Biock 24. Town of Renton, according to plat recorded in Volume 1 of Plats. page 135. in King County. Washington; TOGETHER WITH the Easterly portion of vacated alley adjoining on the West. as vacated by the City of Renton under Ordinance No. 3272 . •• ,"i, ~::.;;. \~~ ~" .... ~-::.=: '"' ..... ~ -- This deed is given in fulfillment of Ihal cerlain real ('sl"t .. contract bel ween Ihe parties hereto, dated March 25. , 19 72 , and condition .. d for the conv"'~'ance of the above described prep"~I~', and the cov"nanls of warranty herein cuntained shall "01 apply to any title, interest or encumbrance arising b\', through or under the pllrch~ser in said cont.act, and sha;, not ,pplyto any taxes,' assessmenls or olher charges levied, assessed or b~,n;ng due subst'quenl to the dale of said .corolract. Real Eslate Sales Tax was paid on' this sale on Et 173)90 ...::.-.;:::::: f'iv Dated this / 2-- STATE OF WASH.INCTON. } .. Coual), of K, n!l On this day peraonally appeared ~forf me March 31. 1972 ,Rec. No. ,I. 7203310189 .-,la.\:· "'-_~.\::-~~:k .. , .... _, .... f..b ..... __ .~::;·.; .. ;.:_1:"k.., .- . \.... . . i./ i ) 1,;-. " ..... tL(..,~'f . .,.~.J; .... ;.: .. f.tf.~~.4:.~~ ....................... . Phiiip M. Lande and Patricia M. Lande to me lDowD to ~ :bI! Individuati described in and wbo aecuted the withiD and forego"" instrument, and ICbowIed&'ed that th.,y siped the same aJ thei r fHe and volualaly act &lid ct-I, for tbe uses an" P'llpMfs therein mentioned. I .~ . Ii GIVEN UDdtr my iwId UId oIIieial seal thi, :"'. I· . ~ day of.. • {"'. <. <. <: <. .. "".,,",.-1-., , 19 ;'/.' /<'( , S // . ,., I. '. '.-.~ .. ''/ '\J/~ ........ : ....... :.A::.I., ..... i1... .... _.-'"-, •• :.J....·.~.:!:.::s.~ .... ,::::r;;:._ ....... . N olary P.6lic ;,. IIrtd lor ,It, S'II'II 0/ W 1I1."t'lJII, residM, III J " __ ...' J! J'-t:'-rt.. 98'21 AFTER RECORDING MAil TO: Tennessee Group l.l.C, 710 So, 2ND ST Renton, WA 98055 000026136 · .•... "";\ -j • Statutory Warranty Deed FILED BY PNWT 3tJ O')~q~'1 THt: GRA:'oITOR Roberl I.. Anderson and I.uanne R. Anderson. husband Ind wile for and in consider-ilIOn of Ten Dollan aad olher valuable consider.lloa IR hand pauf, conveys and warran" ro Terlnence Group ".".(' ... Washlngron Llmlled l.Iablllly Compaoy rhe following descnbed real estlle. slIuared In rhe: Coonry of Kina. Slale of Washlngroll: l.uI 18. Block Z~. Town of Renlon, accordln& 10 Ibe pial Ihereof recorded In Volume I of Plals, pale 135. In lilnll (:ounly. Washlnglon; t:XC[PT Ihe Wesl ~ reer rMreof c:onnyed ro Ihe City or Renlon for IlIe,' purposes by deed recorded uncler Recordi", ~o. 2117478. SlrBJf.CT TO: A.rerment Ind Ihe terms and condillons Ihereol by and belween TIC Cablevisioa of ~ Washln&IOn • Inc. and Roberl L. Anderson, daled June IS. 1994 and retarded Jaauary 4. 1995 uader g: Recordln& Number 9501040627. t .. P4 C N ~ -~ ~. Ass,,~sor·. Propeny Ta~ Paled A<.:nunl Numbet\s): Daled IIlIs 14TH day of ,~pr", 1998, s f", 'I EOI' WASHI:\(jTOS C(JI'"TY OF4fZO.t.iS hwl..l.tYt, I ~er1lf:. "'All kno .... 01 ha'e sal/sfa,lory e"ldence Ihal Robert L. Anderson and Luanne R. Anderson are U:~ p-::;ons "ho appeared before me. and said persons acknowledged lhal they signed rhlS Inslrumenl and l:~r.r.'. !:dgtd ,lin 1;heir (ree and ,'o!unUry acr for Ih~ uses and purposes menrioned in litis insrrumenr, /Jared ~~~~':.'i. .............. : : SARAH J. KELLEY • 1/ : NOTARY PUBLIC S;S~~~~~~~~-;;;::::;:::=:---: STATE 0; WASI-tINGTON No y uSe of Washin~ton : ~I tAo ............ """" June 1. 20t)1. ReSiding al ~ ! _ ....... , ...... " _.... . ..... ....... . My appointment e"pires:~ , , '2.00 ( I.PB·10 £1606396 O~/20/9B 7120.00 400000.00 " ~ III :i -..I 2 ... C; C> '0 os ~ ... a 'i .... -< ~ ... co '" :1: ~ ~ ... ;" rJ • ::Jij _ . t.._ \ .'. I ~, ... , • • - FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: Gail R. McLendon·Baer Tennessee Group. L.L.C. 710 South 2nd Street Renton WA 98055 (206) 235·3555 QUIT CLAIM DEED RF.CE'''ED MAR 51996 KINe. <;OUNTY RECORDER THE GRANTOR, Tennessee Group, a Jelot Venture, for and in consideration of transfer of tide to successor entity without other consideration, hereby conveys and quit claims to Teones:see Group, LLC., ::r GRANTEE, the foUowing real estate, situated in King County, Stale of Washington: A portion of the H.H. Tobin Donation Claim #37 in the Town of Renton described as foHows: ... o o ~ . Beginning at a point on the east line of Burnett Street 150 feet north of the northwest comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, according to the plat RCOrdcd in Volume 1 of Plats, o C") o CD al page 135, in King County, Washington: running thence cast parallel with the north line of said Block 24 a distance of 115 feet; thence north parallel with the east line of Burnett Street, 50 feet; thence west parallel with the north line of said Block 24 a distance of 115 feet to the east line of Bumett Street; thence south on east line of Burnett Street SO feet to the point of beginning. This deed reflects the title transfer of the described real property to the grantee entity, Tennessee Group, L.L.C, which is a continuation of the former grantor business pursuant to conversion of company status to a limited liability company. DATED: January n, 1996. TENNESSEE GROUP JOINT VENTURE BY:InvM~L.t- GaD McLeudon-w, authorized to sign on behalf of grantor and grantee STATE OF WASffiNGTON COUNTY OF KLIIlG ) ) 55. ) On t1iis 'LzEf day of January, 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the Stale of Washingtol'l, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Gail McLendon·Baer and Michael D. McLendon, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that !hey signed and sealed the said instrument as !heir free and voluntary act and deed for !he uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed !he day and year in this certificate above written. ~~l/~' pn t name: . NOTARY PUBUC in and for the State of Washington, My commission expires /c?-,2tJ--7Z £1.73i87 03/07/96 .00 .00 ... 8 • = - • • - • FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: Gail R. McLendon-Ba.er Tennessee Group. L.L.C. 710 South 2nd Street Renton WA 98055 (206) 235-3555 QUIT CLAIM DEED ~ RECI='VED MAR 51988 KIN" COUNTY RECORDER THE GRANTOR. Tennessee GrouP. a Joint Venture, for and in consideration of transfer of title to ;:! successor entity without other consideration, hereby conveys and quit claims to Teanessee GrouP. L.L.C"i GRANTEE, the following real estate, situated in King County, State of Washington: ~ ~ < O~ That portion of the Henry H. Tobin Donation Claim No. 37 in Section ·18, Township 23 ~ North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington described as follows: I ~ Beginning on the east margin of Burnett Street in the City of Renton north 00°40' o east 730 feet from centerline of Second Avenuej thence south 89°07' east l1S feeti thence a north 00°46' east 75 feetj thence south 89°07' west 115 feeti thence south 0°46' west 7S feet CD to the point of beginning. SUBJECT to easements, restrictions and reservations of record if en any. .... This deed reflects the title transfer of the described real propeny to the grantee entity, Tennessee Group, 8 L.L.C, which is a continuation of the fonner grantor business pursuant to conversion of company status to a limited liability company. . DATED: January IT, 1996. TENNESSEE GROUP JOINT VENTURE BY:hMZm~ -fir-: Cd McLendon-. er, authorized to sign on behalf of grantor and grantee ., STA1E OF. WASHINGTON ~ • L I ........ , I COUl\1TY OF IGNO . .:.t j' I', ) ) ss. ) o 6ntiri5'ii#day of January, 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for thtState of Washington;'duiy commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Gail McLendon-Baer and Michael D. MClendon·, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me lhat they signed and sealed the said instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this cenificate above written. E14731B2 03/07/96 .00 .00 .1 -- _ .t ..... FILED FOR. RECORD AT REQUEST OF: Gail R. Mcl.endon-Baer 'Tennessee Group. L.L.C. 710 South 2nd Street Renton WA 980.55 (206) 235-3555 - • - QUIT CLAIM DEED RECEIVED MAR 51996 KING COUNTY RECORDER - ~ 1lI i :; ;; 8 ;:r THE GRANTOR, TeDI1essee Group, a JolDt Venture, for and in consideration of transfer of tide to ~ suc:c:essor entity without other consideration, hereby conveys and quit claims to Tenaessee Group, L.L.C.l\ GRANTEE, the following real estate, situated in King County, Slale of Washington: I an A portion of the H.H. Tobin Donation Claim No. 37 ~ the Town of Renton, Washington, ~ C) known as the Shearer Tract, particularly _described as follows: fji C) Commencing at the Northwest Comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, according 'to ~ plat recorded in Vol. 1 of Plats, p. 135, records of said county, which comer bears South o 89°07' East 30 feet and North 0°46' East S30 feet from the Monument at the intersection of M Second Ave. and Burnett St.;"'Ihcnce North 0°46' East 275 feet to the point of beginning: o thence North 0°46' East 76.52 feet; thence South 89D07' East 115 feet; thence South 0°46' ~ West 76.52 feet; thence North 89°07' West 115 feet to the point of beginning. ... 8 This deed reflects the title transfer of the described real property to the grantee entity, Tennessee Group, L.L.C, which is a continuation of the former grantor business pursuant to conversion of company status to a limited liability company.' DATED: January 11., 1996. Tennessee Group Joint Venture By: /e~-fk== GaD McLendon-Baer, authorized to sign on behalf of grantor and grantee ST.~TEOF WASIDNGTON ) l '.. .' I • . ) -r SL COUNTY OF-KING ) , ' By:~~~J)~'f-M.!.::;'vLIL-::::.;.:::;~_' Ml el D. McLendon, authorized to sign on behalf of grantor and grantee -', O~ti.ti~',-'1~ay of January, 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Wa.~gtO!\ .. duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Gail McLendon-Baer and Michael D. McLendon;io'ine known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they signed and sealed the said instrument as their free and VOluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affIXed the day and year in this certificate above written. ~~~u£4 £1473191 03/07/96 .00 .00 - , , .' . ~ ... .... ...... . :.' . • J "t!h~ nt fl :,t ~!: t:.· -~t, r';' ·11~j:r.n ·-t.r~'t. 1.':1V P!'CI~\tC'f}1 ··c:tt: 4'1~; tt ': cf L: ~ , .. ~'cr c· ··l·~ ~~3, ~n ~:.~ pl,~t 01" tho 'OWll. Ino ... "1t,Y1 of .ll):1t.'n: t.tl ~. ()" 1:!~' -~ l:).~d :."t to 1 t 4 t\,... ,,~ 'l ..,., f'* .. \.. ,I ." r.... ,'. ...""\ :1 .1111 ...... " .. l~P: O·:llf;6n .... ::. C;y. w"d 1', 'II C ........ ,.o'l.ln .. ~r "CIT;;'-.~"'_ otal:'lt,jr-:i l1;t:io. ~!; t!: .~ ,)'1 '1 ... :' ~. I~:: • ;'/~" ::2.03 :"t; th ~~ 89' ')7' .. lo.~U ~:t to th!) !'C':je '~Pl' 15-2tt':.bl rt).a.nk l.'anltold. btit ;.r.<t ~'uvis. ~ Ptor ~.nton •. :.,~.':)~~ • ..:-::~ay t~~ .. ~o.{jll to s'; ":~;)j:~,I:~1ij:~~?~ ....... '. · · ", b ·~.o 23 • .c5 .:". 2 b1 .. :: 31-28 .... -~.~1.·: ,Jt~lellrerv~rJ~tllrlf1lrot :;h"'nJ'''~. hw, ot .'.'.\ .:. -. ,;~~~tlh. ot tll';ttt~:o 88 :"0""': ar (:: .. ·';,rt..: ,(~, -tp,. (~ door r.~,y a8 . nn r"ll ey • 'l,epcr.':-U'l. c t 'lI',(I. ~lltl1oi~l..e t~ t.:-lC ril. \..;I('l fvt.' !jjr~c in ;:cw: , .. '"hi) ~,: 5 ft (·r ,~Jo~ [) hl;{ ~:.'i cwn ,,1' :~~lt<:I~. J& plt4tt.o( l.ii;(~. t.I t'~.4 in u.~ :>~d!Je 1"/; tt.l) ·,r.r cf Kc:w. '\"",~'~~Ol' U".!:" ~,:~e rf. the. Jf);.4bllc ::~(II'OV(!l" ~I ~: ~1::,l' t '~n %!Y;t ?'~·~~~~~~~:·;~~!a~~~~:1n~ ' ...... ,. '. ,,:'y;~~~f.>,..' ,... , , , ••• t • ,:}'\(,d,:" J L. ".,'i. Uyrtl&,'.,.' .. .'r" ............ ~ ~/,. :::5 bjr'::4)., Griindey 011(,\ . ···.,()ll.bJl.k~t),<~f';r";for Hn. reo'ii' '.: . ___ .......................... _,.; .. ~ ... ~ •• _ ...... ___ ._ •• _ •• 4 ••••••• _ •• __ : : Q&, aacI "lII1~ .......... ,_."~~;.;,,.,.~.~._ .... , .................. ___ "_...;. • ,.: , . ,:·;'.'i ~: .: • t .:,; Quit Claim Deed ~ THE GRANTOR 'MCLENDON HARDWARE >_~. IoraDd in consideration of;< One Dollar ($1.00) ; iii conYeylandquitc:laimlto "~:tHE'CITY OF RENTON. A MtMlCIPALITY KING Stata 01 WlIIhinJton, The North. JO ;'eet of the south 30 feet of Lot 3. Block 2". Town of Renton.;,a.):eeorded .In ~olume of plats. page 135 records . ~Ing Countv~\"ashlngton :'.;" :.~':,.';';~:! .. :\ .. : .. ·.,~. .' ',. l ~, ~. ,. ,. 1~ ~. f· ~ , I 1 f. l ( r i i. ~ Il) ,-::l ..t) :1'0 ;-. n .. -.' i ,'-.1 ~, .) .- N <:- ," t;) 0 '":) ';" ~ .... ~ .::. ':'. -, ( "~~;'" ~'.-.. ' .\1::;) ;:: . :>::;,';,,;/~t~~:>:'l}';' " CITY, ~~J;~.'fOH, WASH.I~GT. l<,/ .!tf:-t\;JS't~;·r~:l:~l~i-",. '\ 'i.<\\~~(. " ': ORDINANcE' HO. ~2 ,.> ..... '''':/':'>' : ... ,~ .. .~-;:~.::S?::~ ' . .' AN ORDINANCE 'or 'THE CITY OF RENTON.' WAsHINGTON VAC~TING A PORTION OF ALLEY BETWEEN WILLIAMS SOUTH AND BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH (VAC-4-78) "-"j' WHEREAS a propel' petition for vacating ~ portion of an alley between Williams South and Burnett Avenue South. Renton, King County, Washington, was duly fil~d with the City Clerk on or about June 12, 1978, and said petition having been signed by owners representing more than two-thirds of the property abutting upon ::~such alley sought to be vacated; and :.'/,1: _' , .. :-, WHEREAS the eity'C()un~ilby Resoiuti()n,No~ 2194 passed and approved on June 26, 1978 and after ·'d~~':t~~~~tigation. did fix and determine the 24th day of July, 1978 at the· hour cf 8:00 in the City WHEREAS Public , ., '.". . . '., . '.' ".' . . . ' .' ~~',,",,;(.. ";".,: '. , ~..": .. ,.;,:,Department of the City of Renton having .,d~'-y 'conSidered said petition '. "" : < ',..:-<::':::. ,,:', , ... ;-1,\ ,.:i;; -:".< :.:-,;.·:~~.;:;<~·4'~'\""j·:': :._,. ' :"".:.' " .. ,:-:/:.: said vacation;;'~(l'havinjf()Und ·s.4m~(;~~ii~~~:~ .the public il\te~st:, T·:O;.·"'IIIlQ for the publio benefit, and' n()inju~:b~d~ge to any person' ," .,.,' . , -, - properties will result from s~ch vacaU~n',:,' . '.' '.' -. -' : '.-;~.~' ~,:.;," .. ":' . NOW THEREFORE ,THE CITY:.COllNCIL'br/THE CITY OF RENTOt'. . ., ~., .... '.' , .... :."' .. /, .. ' .:-.. ; ;\:·:~~:.;~,:t".:": ; nUu)H:[NG'fON, DO ORDAtN~S FOLLOWS:, "';:/'; . . .",' ,.:.,,' " . SECTION I trite, follow~"g described ~rtion of alley .,: ... ",. .. I I i '" en r0-O oct, .- N -CO ro- ,.. ":-\'; •.. :.~ That portion of an alley b4Ji~, th~~f 10 feet", within b1ock2 .. , Town of'Ront ,"" d "in VOlwae ':' 1 C?f Plats,"page 135, Ni:iO~8:{~,., ' "'" .,~t7,Waeh1n~on 1Y1ng southerly of the westerly,:,:extenaion of the nOl'th line of Lot 17 said plat: situdii':within the NE 11 .. of Sec. 18, T-"p 23 N., Range U'i:£WH. ".' ':",.~' BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED, SUBJECT,TO It dedication to the City cf sufficientpl'operty owned by the',~~;iic~~ts along theweetel'ly . . ... :~.: ,~.1~\:: :··~.'!L ::.~ margin of said property from Burnett Avenue"to oil point connecting with the existing alleyway immediately to the porth of the vacated portion, .. ;" ,the dedication more particularly describe,~ ;4S follows: ',. '~·>i· :'" . . '," ,- The North 10 feet of the south 30 feet of L~'t:j, Block 24. Town of Renton, as recorded In Volume I of plats,'pap;;13S records of King I County, Washington '/:""":" f ,.:,~:.:~iM·:: ! .' :~:~: passage, approv~l' and five day~~fterit8 pu~lication. , ..... . A ceI'tif,ledcopy of this O~ina.rict! shall be filed witb , ", ;"',: < . .;" :. ,: }>.~r·:i/:~: .. ;'~t:..::> . .' :',,' Office of, Reooltds and Election9;Klng';,¢ounty, and as otherwise .\~.:~·f.\.->, .". ;,':.' ;'1;.<.-';' :~.~ . . provided by law.~' .' I' \ r r t r I ! •• -~ ;!;{c,;,{~i;fffiJri:}L;i~~~:~,;:-" till ~ POR;;;Z~T~, ~ t::::::t • MC LENDoN HARDWARE ,... o 'III:t t'''''':'' =ALEX CUGINI JR . .- N -CO ,.... ';" :' ..•.. :: .. : .. :;'", -I I ···.i{i., :1':.~ir:':: , ':.,' ... ~I • t'J ~ .:: -..... .... , ~ '.;~ J l.' ·.cv j ... ! '··.~:n1~on •• !lr. ~;.a:::'.l~ ;-tJtllddsr •• hw 1:~.: "Jf; to C1t,'l)~ '\.~r;tc.n. ';I.l(!hl.n~t(.ln \ .. .. I:p& h1)~r 1: b and ;~1Ia,:t\te t;:;cpfcr t~,;tI of the pub110 ttY: dn '-:<;.11'''''' ~~ . .:.o fc'1"'lt'li1 I .... ·C·!.! ... . :,'. .. "'.' v •. '.. . . ~., " ....., .. . Ii 6 it 01" lot 1( \)lk 2' ,!.Jlnt ('1' .1.( ~n 01' ~(mtc.m. :if~ .• of !'if.d 0. t t la ~!.·I' o! t:4ej~~;1' of t ,;/: . ..... . '.:' ";~;&~: :~4.·2 5 '"'bj .Il&J:U.,.-)'. ~lohmood. ~ ,:to ftp) (' .• iUo ta., '" 811 ~llr~~:0~.:~~~~:~::Wdn .,:tti:k~;;;';::< ," . i J ~.:o~t1d.hrirtd "&'lr~·itJ-l~oV .. ti4.n.hn btt· ) for i'n.:roa tit ;;oaton. ,;;~S'f:·, 'lay 1-26? , '. :,~: . " . . . ~; .. ~:~ .J, ' .. ~ >~.;~/.: ,'" ~:. :" , . '& .,. o "','L,I,V, Right of Enlry Agreement 920 Renewal TCI Cable\ision of Washing Ion, Inc. 15241 Padlic Highway South , Seanle, Wa. 98188 RECEIVED DEC 291994 PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY KINGCOUN1Y RECORDER Name: ROBERT L ANDERSON Address: P.O. BOX 454 City: RENTON, WA 9S057 Contact Person: Telephone: 221H1!80 Name: Address: III WILUAMS AVE S City: RENTON, WA 98055 Contuct Person: Telephone: This Agreement entered into this /;" day of _' ~I AA ' ,1994, by and between TCI 'Cabll!vision of Washington, ---mc. ("CO.P 'l'lil. and ROBERT L l'-ANDERSON ("OWNER") located at P.O. BOX 454, RENTON, WA 98057. ~ In consideration of the mUiual.covenant~, benefits and promises set out herein, the panics o mutually agree as follows: . ~ 1. OWNER hereby grants \0 COMPANY the right 10 construct. install, own, upgrade. ~ operate and maintain equipment necessary to provide cable television service " ("SYSTEM"). upon the property and within the building(s) consisting of 4 units located at '" 111 WILLIAMS AVE S in the city of RENTON, and the county of KING, in the state of :tl Washington (the"PROPERTY"). 2. Subject to the availability thereof pursuant to applicable programming a8reemellts. and the terms hereof. it is understood and agreed that the programming seMces offered by COMPANY hereunder will be those generally provided to the community. COMPANY reserves the right' from time to time and at any time' to modify or change such programming. 3. OWNER shall provide, without charge to the COMPANY, adequate space and electricity, and right of acce~s for thl! construction. installation,operations, mamtenance and repair of the SYSTEM, and for marketing, disconnecting and maintaining its service to residents of the PROPERTY. incluJing, if nl!cessary, a key to any locked room or door that contains the COMPANY'S SYSTEM. 4. COMPANY shall construct. upgrade, install. own and maintain the SYSTEM in the building(s) described above, in accordance with all applicable regulations and codes. All parts of the SYSTEM on the PROPERTY, regardless of whether installed within or outside of buildirig(s) and whether installed overhead. above. or underground. and shall remain the personal property of the COMPANY, and shall not be considered a fIXture to the real estate or fIXtures of the building(s) located thereon, nor shall any part of the SYSTEM be used at any time by or for the benefit of any party other than the COMPANY. ' § 5 COMPAN~ agrees to indemnify O~NER ror any da".'age caused by COMPAN'(arising :.u from or relaung to the construction, installation, operallon or removal of such facilities by ~ COMPANY. COMPANY agrees to maintain public liability insurance covering its o activities on the property, in amounts of not less than 5500,000 for injury to anyone person. ~ $500,000 aggregate for any single occurrence, and at least $500,000 for property damage., '-' . "';:..;';';';;-;-'·iii'"~"'4a:&:'I1'JIl2.i •• &.& •• 1I2~y-~'1lII6.& .. -.. tII="~-: ... :;p'p'.II\II'" • !.! i I q l o 6. TYPE OF ACCOUNT. INDIVIDUAL RATE ACCOUNT: OWNER agrees that COMPANY shall have the right to market and contract with individual residents of the PROPERTY for service, who shall be: charged and billed individually for connection to the SYSTEM at the COMPANY'S regular and current monthly service rates, including applicable taxes and connection charges applicahle to the service ordered. 7. By execution of the: Agreement OWNER hereby grants COMPANY a Right of Entry !l"d Easemem over. across; along and under thOe PROPERTY for the construction. Installation, marketing. disconnecting. maintenance, repair. and replacement of all pans of the SYSTEM to serve the PROPERTY and/or adjoining properties. 8. OWNER agrees that resident managers will notify the COMPANY if and when they become aware of any damages 10 the COMPANY'S equipment including. but notlimite!d to, lock boxes. cable, vault and convertt:rs. 9. It is understood and agreed that COMPANY may ab;mdon its facilities in place and shall not be responsible for the removal thereof if such abandoned facilities will not interfere with the use and occupancy of the PROPERTY. The facilities will not be considered to bl: abandoned unle!ss wriuen notice to the effect is given by COMPANY to OWNER. 10. The term of thb Agreement shall be for a period of 15 years, from the date first written above, rcncw<lble upon mutual agreement between COMPANY and OWNER for an additional term of 15 years, howcver, the COMPANY may terminate this Agreement with thirty (30) days notice to the OWNER if COMPANY is unable to install or maintain the C1ble television system because of any governmental law. rule or regulation or due 10 aoy other cause beyond the reasonable control of the COMPANY. Should the OWNER elect to subscribe to a Bulk Rate Account for a term to be less than full term of this Agreement. upon termination or expiration of the Bulk Rate Agreement term the OWNER may renew that sa!d Bulk Rate Agreement or convert to the !ndi,,!dually. biJIe.d rate account(s) for the remainder of the term of this Agreement as outbned an secllon SLI( (6), paragraph one (1) herein. 11. This Agreement supercedes any and all other Right of Entry Agreements between the parties, either oral or in writing. and replaces all other or previous Right of Entry Agret:ments relating to the subject mailer hereof for the PROPERTY. 12. The benefits and ubligations of this Agreement shall be considered as a covenant running with the land. and shall inure to the benefits of, and be binding upon, the successors, assignees, heirs and personal representatives of the OWNER aod COMPANY. OWNER agreees to di~c1ose said agreement to any subsequent OWNER of the property. 13. If legal aClion is necessary to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevai!ing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses of such aCllon. mcluding reasonable attorney's fees as determined pursuant to such action. 14. The undersigned OWNER or authorized agent hereby represents that he/she is the OWNER of the PROPERTY. or the! authorized afent of the OWNER. with full authority to bind the OWNER to the terms and conditions 0 this Agreement. 15. The OWNER shall not use nor permit the use of the COMPANY'S SYSTEM installed by the CO~1PANY or its agents. or any part of such S~STEM for a~y purp~se. Ol~er than the Ir<lrtsmlssion of the COMPANY signal. In parucular. but Wllhout lurutauon, the COMPANY'S SYSTEM shall not carry signals from or become attached to a master antenna, individual outdoor antennas. antennas for reception of signals from satellites, other cable systems or operators, or any other means of providing television signal. ., ,,' 1 . '. , o • 16. The: OWNER agrees that the: Servicc!s provided herein are for the private viewing only of its tenants, homeowners, occupants :ind residents. 17. The OWNER understands that the Agreement is not binding upon the COMPANY until signed by an officer of the COMPANY. . DERSON Its: [/ L0 !\ .(0" C Date:_6 ... ,.;-;;; ......... -II'---+-4~r:;'-+~ __ _ 171 Dale 0:271t Dale NOTARIZATION OF OWNER/AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE . SS STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ COUNTYOF b II,} .. .l. On this tL-day of \ . , ,1994, before me, a NOlary Public in the State of Wasillngton, p'ersona yappeare t:: " \ L \"' \c.~ ~$ ,\0 me known to be the individual descnbed in and who execule! t e WII an an oregoang Instrument, and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have herC!unl~~el my hand andoffical seal the day and year first abov written., . "'''''''EY.'~''' / I ! / ...~ ~ e 1:£>:' t • .I . .' (( --~<r,~ .......... ,,--;:./(/1,t tt, u::!'==":::~~-:--"'r"'""'""-lp->-.::::.::-'""~..."...:v~ __ ~~ ~~~III ~. ". -cS' -"", ~ ". i ~"O It-~I' (. '~ , • \4. ••• / . 'J t ~I ...,.->0,...... '. ·s My commission Expires: b ,+d ':js:.. .~ul' ; : .:.uc t=L O\..J <I :;;-:. '* I, .,.....',.. , :u'~ ., -'" ~<:"~ .. 4":' ~ r ~: •• .:-,,, .: 't \' '\\, ............. ~:..;, .. w II, OF WAS\(i;'::. .. ~~ ,\\""""" ... atica_ . .4.$iI ... _M ~ ' ..... ,:-.' .', .. 21" & au fMOe. i I I .. . "'" Ken1:0n, A..&..&&~ __ .~: folloW81 o - Lot 18, Block 24, ~ of Renton, according to plat recorded in volume 1 of Plats, page 135, in King County, Washington, EXCEPT the West 5 feet thereof conveyed to the City of Renton for alley purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 2117478. .l ~~-:--;;;iiijiijii IIILIli!4~.I!!.~ ... 'I.III •• lttll'I!9 •• 4111;:;".;;;III.~7 .. ¢ .. ~. I"".· "·--:~A".' .. ··"~'lr.~."7I<J.:L ... __ • .!I""".' • t .•. 1N 00 ; t! • 1 .·i ; . _ ..... -• '.· .. oJ .,. o • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) 5S COUNTY OF KING ) On December 7. 1994. before me. a Notary Public in and for said State. personally appeared Dan McCany. known to me to be the Vice President of the corporation that executed the within Instrument. known to me to be the person who executed the within Instument on behalf of the corporation therein named as COMPANY and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within Instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its bo:lrd of directors. WITNESS my hand ~d official seal. ,Qr6vcb 04 ( Dorinda L. Buclcles. Notary Public In and for the State of Washington Residing at: Bothell. W A My Comrnlssion Expires: March 30, 1998 I \ • ·\/:1T;l RfCOIHlI\(j ,,,\I!. TO 'Jme /toben I .. ADdenon ,\dJrm.llb Capl .. {;ra) n.SE (",!~. Stale. Z,p Ikun Shorn. W,\ 98569 on:o OF TRUST (Por /I.'" /IIlh,' .,/tII,' of IItulrillglol/ nil"'} ~IIO fiLED BY PN"VT .NO~).cl-f . . o. mrs DEW or TRI:5'f, ntld. thlS 161b &)' of April. 1998. ""t\H.n Tennessee Group L.t.c.. a Washlnj!lon l.imilrd Lflbilily Compan)·. GR .. \;IITOR. whose addr.ss IS 710 So lnd Sl~ Rrnlon, WA 98055. PACI.'le NORTHWEST TITLE COMPA~V. TRI;STEE. whose aJdre.<s IS IZOI Third Menur. Suile 3800. Sealllr, WA 98101-3055. and .Robn1 L. Anderson aad Luaane R. Andenoa. hUJbaad lad "Ire BE:'IiEFIC/ARY. "huse :...Idress IS .116 Ca",. Gno) CI. SE, Ocuo Shorn, "'A 98569. WIT\ESSErH (j,an!or h.".by ""rgolns. sdis and cun>cys III Trustee on Tru>!. with p .. ""r of ",Ie. the follo"10~ ,,k,,,,,btd ... 1 propc.'n) In King CounlY. Washln~ton 1.0' I~, Blork H. Town of Ut'lIloll. according '0 .he pl~' Iherrof recorded in Volume I of Plals. plge IlS. in Kln~ ('ounly. Wuhlnglon: t:xn:PT Ihe Wesl 5 feel Ihereof con"eyed 10 Ihe 01,. of Renlon (or alley purposes by deed re('orded undu Recorciln~ i'io, 2117478. r_:.· ':' '".y ., ....... -:) vro"V ~ h /'r.':':' . c:.,'" ...... . ~ 110 .;' .... 'i'"~ hIJorI; e'·'H .. ~.;·.t I :;. 1 . ., .r !)1.Clwucn ., III to ~ ~;I"'..1 ",.Jr. "~fl ,'\sse,so,s Pro(>Cny Tax Pored ",counl NlInlb<rB): 72JI50-11Z0-06 "h,eh .. al prof'C'lY'S nol uS«! pnnelp.II)· for agn(UhuT.1 or ramlln~ purposes. logcthcr Wllh aI/tenements. hereditaments. and .appurtenanccs 00\\ or hCl"eafter ,hcrcun,o bclong,ntt ()( 50 an)' 'Ao'SC" appcnalOlng. and the rents. ,uoes and profits Ihereof. ThiS deed IS (or the purpose of sccunn~ pc-rfoffi\illlcc of each a!JrCerllC"1I1 of Granlor herem conlalllc:d. and Jl3-rmcnt of Ihe .urn uf Thr .. bundred .iu,· Ibou>lDd and "'0:100 OOIl"'5ISJ~O.OOO.OOI ""h Intorcs: .• n .eeord""ce ","h Ihe I<rm, 01' a prOOIlSSO,) nO'e of e\Cn dale here" IIh, I",phle 10 Heneliel"'), or order. and ",.de by Grantor .• ",1 .11 rene ... i •. .. odln,allolls and e"ens.""s Ihereor. and .Iso such funher sums as m,y ~ adl'anced or 10""c"ti by Ikner,.,.,)' 10 Glanlor. nr an) t)(lhcrr SU((C'!iSOfS or asSigns. logC'lhcr wuh 1"leTeSI ttKreun ill $U('h ralc as shall be 3!,Tttd upon. To proh.-cllhc sccurrl)' of IllIs Deed of Trust Granlor cO'rcmanlS and agrees' To keep the prupeny 10 ~ood eond,llon and rcpaor; to pennI! nu "':&SIC Ihcreof. to complete ""y building. slluetule u, '"'pro,'ement beong bu,il or about to be bUilt thereon; 10 reSlorc prompcly any building. SIIuelur. or Inopro'coocnl Ihereon \\-hlch Ala» be damil~cd or dtstruycd. and 10 comply "'olth all lalAs. ordlnancc$. regulations. (o\cnanIS. conditions and rC~lflcllon~ .affccun~ Ihe proprny To PO), before dclonquent ,111.",(ul taxes and assessments upon the pro(>C"y. 10 leep Ih. property (rcc and clrd' ur all uthor charges. hens or encumbr.nce> Imp.ironr Ihe seeunty orlh" Deed of Trusl. ~ To l«p .,fbulldlngs no'" or berea ncr .rccled on Ihe propen)' dc..:"bed hereon eonllnuously onSUled against loss h} rore 01 otber h31_uds In an amounl nlll less than tbe total debt 5<CUrcd by IhlS Deed ofTrllS!. All policies shall be held by Ihe Iknefielary. and be on such companl<> 3S the BenefiCIary _y appro"e and h.,·c loss payable firsl !O :h. Iknclicoary as ,,~ ,"lereS! may appear and Ihen 10 'he Granlor The amount eollcct'" undcr .ny IOsurance poloey may be .pphed upon any Indebtedness h ... by secured 10 such o.d.,. as Ihe Ikncliclary shall dClcrm.ne Such apphcallon by the BenefiCiary shall nol e~u,e d,>conllnuancc of any proccedong' 10 forcclose IhlS Deed ur Trust In Ihe .'·cnt or roreclosure .• 11 roShts or the Granl~1 In InSurance poloel~' !hm In force shJII pass 10 Ihe purcllaser a! Ihe foreclosure .. Ie. Tu defend .ny aellon or proceeding purponong to ."ccllhe ,eeurny hereof or the nghls or ro"·ers of [)enefrClary '" '1 rustct. and to pa} all COSI$ and expenses. including cost uf totle search and allomey', f ... In a reasonable anlOun!, In any su~h actll){1l1r p"JCcedm~ . .md In an~ suI! brought b} Bcncficl.a.r} '0 forrdo.sC' Ihls [Xed ofTrusl 5. To pay all COSIS. fees and expenscs In connection ~'lIh thiS Deed of Trusi. Irl(ludlng the expenses of the Trustee Incurred In rnforclRS the obhg~lIon ,",curod hereby and TlUSlcc's and anomey's fees aclually I":uncd. os provided by ~talul( (, Should Granlor fill' to pay wh('n due-any la'US. assessmenlS. Insurance premiUms, hens. encumbrances Of other ,h.rgcs againsl Ihe !"opt"y hercon,bu>e desc"bed. Ikncr." .. y .... y pay the same. :on<!!Ioe amounl so pard. Wllh Inlerest II 'he rale sct fonh on Ihe note secured hercb)'. shall be odded 10 ilIId become a p>r1 of Ihc debl scoured In Ih" Occd "fTrusl I.PU·!.~ (\1·'2. PalC lof! • I r IS \Il HALl. Y .. \GREED litH In ,inl" ('\\'nl Jn~' pomon of Ihe pn)pcn~' JS (ai.:l"ft IJr damaged In an emlncnt dUm3m proc('cdlng. Ihe ('ntlrt amount lIt" ,hl' "n.HII m 'm'h ",.lfIH')o then'of as mJ~ be necessary [0 fully '-llisfy the obhS3l1on sccwcd hereby. shall bt panJ IV fkr.~:i,~ .. r~ h) b\! applied to .i.lld ()bh~""011 n~ J ....... ~rlln~ p.aymcnl 0' J.n~ ~u"' ~curcd hcrchy .. (Il'r Its du~ J:llr. Ot:Rdicla~ cJO(S nut \\ 31'-"(' 11$ n~hr 10 require plllmpi p .. ~m\.'nl \\ht.!'rl tim' of .dl uth ... f SUOI) so secured or fo d .. "(:iJ.rc dcfauh for falJurc 10 ~ ray" I he rUhh."C" sJufl U:\'OfI\t'~ JII or an~ pan of 'he propcn~' co\Crtd by Ihl~ Deed of Tru~1 co lhe person cntlllC'd :Ih:ri:tu on \\nlt~n rt.!'~u~!'1 , ... fhl!' (jr.lAlt)r .JnJ Ihe U .. -ntlic.:lary. UT upun 5aus(a<uon of Ihe obhgauon 5('curro ;md \\fIIlIm r\'I"~:.1 'tit r\"'(l,)n'''cymcc n • .ade by Ihe Bcncficl.1I')' or the ptr~n rnfllltd thtttto .~ l'~\(I;'I dcfauh b~ Gr • .,lfor In I~,C payment of;m~ mdcbltdntss ~urnl hcreby Of ,n the pctformancC' or an~ J~r('l·lI1l.'nl (l)nl.JIII(',1 hcrL:"'. ~II )UOI:.. SCI.."Ured M-n:b~ shall Immedla1e!) become due and p.t~.1hlr ar rhe l.p"on or thC" (t(l1l'lit:I"~ , 'n )uI.':h e'cnt and upon "ruI\"n r~II\."s1 of Ilmcfi(laf)" Trustrt sh.1l1stll tM trust pro~n~. In 3ccord~ct \\llh IbL" ()I,."t:ll Hf r.ust '\":1 uf the Sr;&tc of \V.lSllIngton. 31 public ~c(lOn 10.he hightsl bidder. Ani p,!'SQO CAt'rpt Trustee m;ty b,J JI Iru,I«'5 <JIe I<U<I« shAll "1'1'1) Ihe p,u<eni, "f Ihe sale as follo .. s III 10 lhe Clpense of .. Ie. including d 1,".I,,,'1I1.lhk Iru~u"L"'~ ICL,.t.Ild .uromt'y·~ fcc. (2, 10 th~ obllg.3l1un sc(urcd b~ thIS I>«d or Trus.t.13. IhC' surplus. If 011\). shall be distributed 10 the per.~lln5 t:Ulllcti rhtfl.'IO Tru5ll'c !\h.111 dcJn·cr to .he pUrCh.lSCf:at the gle Us dl!cd. \\'uhOUI \43rfant~. \\hl(h m;lll cun'C')' lu the rurchaur Iht' tnllrrst 111 th~~ rh)fk.'rt~ "hl"h (irilnillt hatS 01 haJ die !JOwl"r fa con\'('y ilt thc Ilnt(' orh.s nnutlOn of thiS Deed of ·rrust . . ",d ,u<h "' he mar ha'e ae'luorcd Ihereafter TN..<lec·s deed sh.U rcellc lhe (XIS shOWing Ih:u rhc 531~ "OS COndUtlNIn , ~omphJn'.: ,,'Ith .:III rhe r'Cc.,uucmcnts of IJ,,,' .. nt.f or rhls Deed of Trust ... hleh Tcellal shall be prima (~CIC c\ ,den('( of such """,pil:ll)cc and conelus,,'c e,..dene< Ihereof In fO\or of !>on. lid. purcha. .. ,und encumhr:uoces ror \ aluc. f, Ill' (Xmcr uf safe L'oofcncd b} thiS llccd of TnJSA and by rh( 0.:00 oi Trust .. \el of Ihe Sure of \\·a..,hlnSllln 1\ nor .an (,dWi" ~ fI:n1~d~, liC'n':licl~t) m.1)' (3USt' thiS Dctt! of TflJsl 10 be forcc'CMd;as OJ mongasc In Ihe e\em of rhe dC3lh. Inc"pa,,.y or dlwblhl~ or resignation of Truslee. Oeneficlary may appomllO UTlIIn!= OJ ~Unl",,'Or Iru~fct.". ami upon the ra:ordmg of such ~mlmcnl In rhe mong3!!C r~cofds of thc caunly In \\ hlch thiS Ott\l of I HI';;I." rccllrl'1,"tJ. the ~uc ... cc;Sor Ir\l$oI\'C' shOJIf bc.' ,"(',;ted with all ~wcrs of 1he o'I~lnallru$.cc The rruSIL~ IS nOf obh~attd 10 n(luf~ OJn\ p;.1rt) hereto of pcndJn~ sale under an~ o,he, I>tcrl nf TrUSI OJ or iUl) aeho" or proct.'C'l1mg In v, h'f..-h Grantor" 1'.",1<0 "r Ik"cr.c •• r~ <h:oll be J pan)" unicss such aWon 0' proceed,ng IS h,ou~h, b) !he TIUSCCt: n", f)c<d or TruS! lpphn '0. ,"",<s 10 Ihe ""netil 0(. Jnd IS blndJn~ nOl only on Ihe pamcs herelo. bu, on IhcIr hears.. dC\·lsccs. Icg;Jrcc"~. adnllnlsUacors. c:\ccutors. successors and as.sl~ns The term 'lcncficl;lry shall mc~n the holder and "" ncr cf the n",e secured hereb)·. "helloer 0, nol n.med ... ~ nenelicl:UY heFtI •. Tennessee Group I.I.C .. a W~shlnl:con J.imiled Liabllil~' Company f " .. ( -~--~-._--------Uy: .. ' Yl.l ( I ) ) fd,ul-'k" '{SIL',-- Gall Mel.'futon-Ra.r. ~iJnagcr STYI EOI' WASIII:-;(iTO:-; CUISI '"OF King } ss On Ih" J1lh d.y of Ap"l. I'l'j~. before me Ihe underSIgned .• NOI:UY Public In and for Ihe Siale of W.,h.nSloo. ,july rommlssloned and sworn. personally appeared Gill ""elf.don-O •• r . 10 me knn,," 10 be Ihe Manager of TENNESSEE (;I(()('P, I . .I .. C, • W .. hllll:'on LI.blll~· ('ompsn~·. adnov.'INsN ""d ,"slrumenllo be Ihe free and \·olunlat}'..,1 and d~,d uf <.lId \lanJ~cr . for Ihr. uses and purposes Ihereln menloo",.'d. and on o.,h ".Ied Iha, <aId Indond!J.1 arc .uthon,N to ~'t:t."lIiL· "~ud Insrrumenl on behOltr of f-ai!d llllttlcU l'lIb,lIh' (omp;.r.n,,· . OFFICIAL. 8!AI. UllOA D. DM8Y I<:')h!lic-U."~ IIJ:""·"_~.'" . :--- , or.r) Pu~hr on and ro, Ihe SI.'< "f W .. honS'o Resldong J1 Enumclsw' \1> .pp"lnlnornl uP"" Sepc. 15. 2000 """'_ ...... _____ ~I:QI~STfOH H:I.I.IlI:COSVEYASCE Th~ li,,:J(,,!~:l'nt.·d I~ 'he 1q.!JJ O',mCf ;trod holde, of rhr norc :lnd ;:Iff olher Ifld('hredn~'" secured hy th(' ",Ih,n DccJ of I ",., ~!ld nryl< Iny.l'Ih", ",th all ""'''' ondeboed,,", "",,urcd by ,ard £lmj of llUs!. ha.. bern fully p.,d and <a1l.f,M: and :.·.'U ,,:c r.c:reb:. reqU(;lc\J OIJlj dlreeled, un p4)onlCniio ~O~ of an~ !turm o~lnJ: to )OU undcr the ICrms or S31d Utcd of Trust (~I -:..snlt:l Sosld nt}tc aho'lol" menllonal, mJ ~I other C'V,dencC1 of IndC'btedness Iecured b)' u,d Ilecd of TrU$l dcl"rned tu you hCfC".\I!t': lO~('hcr ·.lollt-. lht' ~Id l>ecd of lru~t. and 10 r«nn\c) ..... ilhOlJ1 v.manl),.lo the ~t:tS designated by Ihe terms of ~.Jld Ik(d uf 1 ru'\l. alllhc Cil .. !C no'A-heM 0:" :-·UU Ihefeunder I "'Inl I.PII·:2 (II"'}!) It.~~ur~ • IWIO: ON SAU: AUlH·:NOUM . . :, IlIlhe evcnlllml allY Ict;alor equilUhle ownership righl or inleresl inlhe properly submilled as securilY li)r Ihis Illan mill fur paymcnl of Ihe nole evidencing Ihe 1IIIIn indehledness. which pnlpcrfy is kg:"I}' dcserihetl in Ihis Deed ofTrusl, in any way changes or becomes vesled in a pilrl)' olher Ihan Ihe granltlr named hcreill, Ihen :11 Ihe IlpliulI and on demand of Ihe hendieiary, fhe IInpai" h"I;IIII:': or fhe nllfe anll lonn illllehledncss secured by Ihis /A'Cd IIf Trusl or ill II(Wilion Iherelll, logelher wilh nil lIccmetl inleresl :lnd charges, shall OCCIlIllC illlmct/ialcly duc ;lIId paYlIhle 10 fhe bcncliciary. If paymenl i" lilll is 001 llIi1de lil"uwing Slidl (/.:.11"11<1. Ihe Ilcnclieiilry slwll he elllilled 10 all ri1:IIIS nm' rCllIct./ics provit./cd ill Ihis Dcc" .. ,. Tru.~1 and Ihe lillie il st·cllrcs. illclllllint; Jilrec/usllrc. This clause eXlends In· rcal eslale wnlrad, leases wilh IIplion hI pllrchase, am' "II invilluniary Inmslcrs, hUI (Ioes I1IlI eXlcnd 10 Illhcr IcOIscs or rClllals. or changcs n:sulling from marriat;c, inhcliluncc, dc\'ise or gili; pft)vidl!d. hOlVever, Ihal "flt'r .IIIY marri;lgc, inherilam:c, devbc or gin, Ihis clause shull he enlorcc;.I11.: ag'linsl ,lilY spollse, SUCel~SSJlf. heir, or (Inllee urlhe granlor, or any of Ihdr hdrs, successors or assigns. Thl! gr:lIl1nrs. Iheir heirs. sueccssnrs IIr assigus, are rClluircd hy Ihis cilVc:nanl 1\1 give Ihe hCllctieiary illll1ll!tliale 'lillie.: ill wrilinll or allY slIch l!hangc, pruvid\!d Ihal failllr.: 10 give 11111 icc shull 11111 detcIII Ihis rrovisinll, amllhe decisi(\Jl uflhl! beneficiary in any illslance nOI 10 enforcc Ihc wllllilions oflhis pwvision 10 .he D.:ed (II' Trusl shall nol at any lime be construcd :IS tlc/c:lling, (lr ;IS .1 waivCf n" all)' Ilflhe lerlllS of Ihe nOh:. (Ir Ihis Deed ofTruSI securing il~ or uflhis prllvisilln as III sul1sC(llIenl insllInccs of such chungc. Dale: Apr:ll 16, 1998 TENNESSEE GROUP LLC, a Washi ngt on Limited I.lability COlIJpany Gail HcLendon-Baer, Hanager After Recording Mail To: American Meter & Appliance, Inc. 1001 Westlake Avenue North Seattle, WA 98109 AMERICAN t1ETEI> LE. PAGE 00 1 or aa3 02/02/2001 10 01 kING (OUNn IJA ., ..... -: 1000 WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S COVER SHEET County King Account Number 48700 Date January 17,2001 This document attached to MEMORANDUM OF LEASE, dated November 10, 2000 For real property located at 111 Williams Avenue South, Renton, WA Lessee AMERICAN METER & APPLIANCE 1001 Westlake Avenue North Seattle, WA 98109 Lessor Tennessee Group LLC AbbreViated Legal DeSCriptIon LOT 18 BLOCK 24 PLAT RENTON TOWN OF LESS ALLEY Assessor's Property Tax Parcell Account Number(s) 723150·2120-0 Page 1014 After Recording Mail To: American Meter & Appliance, Inc. 1001 Westlake Avenue North Seattle, WA 98109 MEMORANDUM OF LEASE · ... (. County Account Number Date King 48700 November 10, 2000 thiS memorandum of lease IS made and entered Inlo between AMERICAN METER & APPLIANCE, INC, A Washington Corporahon, hereafter called LESSEE and Tennessee Group LlC, Owner, or actrng with full authonty as Owner's agent, hereafter called LESSOR An unrecorded lease eXists between the aforemenboned parties and Its terms ana conditions are Incorporated herem by reference . LESSOR hereby leases to LESSEE the laundry room(s} situated on LESSOR'S real property, consisting of five (5) rental unrts located at111 South W,lhams Street, Renton, WA The term of thiS lease IS not to exceed twenly (20) years LESSOR LESSEE' AMERICAN METER & APPLIANCE, INC B~ diiJYl~ Eke TITLE A/lPfV II G E~ TITLE Sale, ReDllesj ntatlve V Page 2 of 4 ---_._,:-,"'" -.' .. ~ . STATE OF WASHINGTON (Individual Acllnowledgment) COUNTY OF __ --0.-....:-___ _ ./ , to me known 10 the w~hln and foregoing Instrum_em. "8lf~Wledged ihat ____ signed said Instrument as ___ _ ..---nd deed, for ses and purposes Iheretn menllOned --:7'''''-''''-.;:--day of __ ~ ________ , 200_ Notary Publ!C 10 and for the State of Washington resldmg al __ ---',""" __ IO _____ Counly 'SO STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING (Corporate Acknowledgment) On thiS day persona"y appeared before me Robert J Hart, III, to me known to be the Sales Representative 01 the corporation descnbed herem that executed the Wlthm and foregOIng Instrument. and acknowledged said Instrument to be the free and voluntary ad and deed of said corporahon, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he IS authoflzed to execute said Instrument and that the seal affixed. If any, IS the corporate seal of said corporabon \'",,, "h"" :1.\\\'" .. 'Utt'I~~VEN Under My Hand and Official Seal thiS 10th day of N0::ivember 2000 " ...... ~,-:. ... iiii··"· , ~ ".... ~ I!. .$ .··r--~... ~ I/~ L ~ ... o~ ~ .. ~ (t- -i (J .. QTAR" \ ~ i ____ i:: Notary Public In and for the State of Washlnglon \ ,. ~ : = reSiding at Seattle, WA 10 King County -"fit lIl\.\ .. ; 2 -; ..... , , ... ~~ ~~· .. Pr ., •• ,~ .... ~ ~ ..... a..... 1 •. ' 011. ~ ~,.r~ ........ \ .... \ ... ~,~ STATE ,,11) (Corporate Acknowledgment) COUNTY OF )L I N G, } On thiS day personaUy appeared before me G A I k M (; L€ N Do tJ ~ A£.-/l-, 10 me known to be the ~AfiJl~ ___ of tlJ-~f1 de,cnb"u tRl'ellth II e(ecJ!l'd Iht' '11i1/1in clOU for!'gotn!) 11slnl·"enl, a'ld acknowledged said Instrumenl to be Ihe free and voluntary act and deed of said wrporallon, for the uses and purposes therein menbooed, and on oath slaled that So tlf IS authonzed to execute said Instrument and that the seal affixed, II any, IS the corporate seal of 5aid corporation GIVEN Uri~~~ and OffiCial "Seal thiS Jl() ~ day of 'fly £Irk / ---;1E M '" . 2001l. .;(<)~·~SiON~~~~II, '-n7. , ~-. ~ "1.<>'. '<,,: , ~-f-J':5Q.::L6d.'!1.a.c:..L..c......~~:IiooI:.!k3..:3...:3.4L ___ -! ! i it ~OTAR't ~\ 0 ~ Notary Public 10 and for the Stale o~Shlngton ~ : 0 -C/): ~ ?" I II ~hU ""_~ I. • • , residing alCd'.t:ae.u..'aXL In A.oVIAJC.-~ \ PUBL\C ! 1 I " .t\.. •• , '~"" ft-~ ••• .0. 2 9 .~ ••• , .! -, ~ .... -.. :~ .:-\" OFWpS"t'V"~_-\"" ... " ..... -- County Page 3 of 4 • ·--,..,. 20040102001939.001 RETURN ADDRESS. COLUMBIA STATE BANK LOAN OPERATIONS MS-6120 1102 BROADWAY PLAZA TACOMA, WA 98402 ---1111111111 III lUI 20040102001939 TRANSNATION TI DT 34.00 PAGE"1 OF 01& 'CrD-1 DI3 77cJ5 l1l15~ DATE December 29, 2003 Reference # (If applicable) Grantor(s) 01/82/2004 14.27 KING COUNTY, ~A. . DEED OF TRUST 1 MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC Grantee(s) 1. COLUMBIA STATE BANK 2 TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE, Trustee Additional on page __ Legal Descrrptlon. A POR OF HENRY H TOBIN DONATION ClM #37, SEC 18, T 23 N, R 5 E, W M IN KING COUNTY Assessor's Tax Parcel 10# 7231502030, 0007200154, 0007200139,0007200130,0007200109,0007200156,0007200104 13~/5" AddItional on page X 7231502120; THIS DEED OF TRUST is dated December 29, 2003, among MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 710 S SECOND ST, RENTON WA 98055 ("Grantor"); COLUMBIA STATE BANK. whose mailing address is KENT lPO, 504 W. MEEKER. KENT. WA 98032 (referred to below sometimes as "Lender" and sometimes as "Beneficiary"); and TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE. whose mailing address is 14450 NE 29TH PLACE, SUITE 200. BELLEVUE, WA 98007 (referred to below as "Trustee" •• FK.Eo FOR RECORD AT THE REOUEST (J~ 'fRANSNATION TITLE INSUR.~NCE co. . '\ Loan No. 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 2 CONVEYANCE AND GRANT For valuable conslderetlon, Grantor conveys to Trustee In trust with power of sale, nght of entry and possession and for the benefit of Lender as Benefrclary, all of Grantor's fight, title, and Interest In and to the folloWing descrtbed real property, together With all eXisting or subsequently erected or affixed bUildings, Improvements and fixtures, all easements, rights of way. and appurtenances. all water, water rtghts and ditch rights (lncludmg stock In utIlitIes With ditch or Irrrgation rights). and all other rights, royalties, and profits relating to the real property. Including Without limitatIOn all minerals. 011. gas. geothermal and Similar matters, (the "Real Property") located In KING County, State of Washmgton. See ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION, which IS attached to this Deed of Trust and made a part of thiS Deed of Trust as if fully set forth herem The Real Property or Its address IS commonly known as 104 & 82 BURNETT AVE S, 710 5 2ND ST; 111, 79, 81,91 WILLIAMS AVE S; 7075 S TOBIN ST, RENTON, WA 98055 The Real Property tax identificatIOn number is 7231502030, 0007200154, 7231502085, 7231502120,0007200139,0007200130,0007200109,0007200156,0007200104 CROSS-COLLATERALIZATION In addition to the Note. thiS Deed of Trust secures all obligations. debts and liabilities. plus Interest thereon. of Grantor to Lender. or anyone or more of them. as well as all claims by Lender against Grantor or anyone or more of them, whether now eXisting or hereafter arising. whether related or unrelated"to the purpose of the Note, Whether voluntary or otherWise. whether due or not due. direct or indirect, determined or undetermmed, absolute or contingent, liqUidated Or unhqUidated whether Grantor may be liable indiVidually or JOintly With others. whether obligated as guarantor. surety. accommodallon party or otherWise. and whether recovery upon such amounts may "e or hereafter may become barred by any statute of limitations. and whether the obligation to repay such amounts may be or hereafter may become otherWise Uflenforceable FUTURE ADVANCES SpeCifICally, Without limitation, thiS Deed of Trust secures. In addition to the amounts speCified In the Note. all future amounts Lender In ItS discretion may loan to Grantor. together WIth aU Interest thereon Grantor hereby assigns as secunty to Lender. all of Grantor's nght. title. and Interest In and to aU leases, Rents, and profits of the Property ThiS assignment IS recorded In accordance With ReW 65 08 070, the lien created by thiS assignment IS mtended to be speCifIC. perfected and choate upon the recording of thiS Deed of Trust Lender grants to Grantor a license to collect the Rents and profits, which license may be revoked at Lender's option and shall be automatically revoked upon acceleration of all or part of the Indebtedness THIS DEED OF TRUST, INCLUDING THE ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE SECURITY INTEREST IN THE RENTS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, IS GIVEN TO SECURE (AI PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS AND (81 PERFORMANCE OF ANY AND ALL OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE NOTE, THE RELATED DOCUMENTS, AND THIS DEED OF TRUST THIS DEED OF TRUST IS GIVEN AND ACCEPTED ON THE FOLLOWING TERMS PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE Except as otherWise prOVided In thiS Deed of Trust, Grantor shall pay to Lender all amounts secured by thiS Deed of Trust as they become due, and shall strictly and In a timely manner perform all of Grantor's obligatIOns under the Note. thiS Deed 01 Trust, and the Related Documents POSSESSION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPERTY Grantor agrees that Grantor's possession and use of the Property shall be governed by the folloWing prOVISIons \ PossessIon and Use Until the occurrence of an Event of Default. Grantor may (1) remam m possessIon and control of the Property. 121 use, operate or manage the Property, and (31 collect the Rents from the Property !thiS privilege IS a hcense from Lender to Grantor automatically revoked upon defaultl The followIIl9 prOVISIOns relate to the use of the Property or to other limitations on the Property The Real Property IS not used princIpally for agricultural purposes Duty to Maintain Grantor shall maintain the Property In tenantable condition and promptly perform all repairs. replacements, and maintenance necessary to preserve ItS value NUisance, Waste Grantor shall not cause,. conduct or permit any nUisance· nor COmmit, permit. or suffer any stnpPlng of or waste on or to the Property or any portion of the Property Without limiting the generality of the foregOing, Grantor Will not remove, or grant to any other party the right to remove. any timber. minerals (Including 01' and gas). coal, clay, scona. SOil, gravel or rock products Without Lender's prior wntten consent Removal of Improvements Grantor shall not demolish or remove any Improvements from the Real Property Without Lender's prror wrttten consent As a condition to the removal of any Improvements, Lender may requite Grantor to make arrangements satisfactory to Lender to replace such Improvements with Improvements of at least equal value ~OO'6t6 ~OO~O ~OPOO~ .... -J. -" Loan No: 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) 20040102001939.003 Page 3 Lender's Right to Enter Lender and lender's agents and representatives may enter upon the Real Property at all reasonable tImes to attend to Lender's Interests and to Inspect the Real Property for purposes of Grantor's compliance wrth the terms and conditions of this Deed of Trust Comphance wrth Governmental ReqUIrements Grantor shan promptly comply, and Shall promptly cause compliance by all agents, tenants or other persons or entities of every nature whatsoever who rent, lease or otherWise use or occupy the Property In any manner, With all·laws, ordInances, and regulations, now or hereafter In effect, of all governmental authOrities apphcable to the use or occupancy of the Property, Including Without limitation, the Americans WIth DisabIlitIes Act Grantor may contest'" good faith any such law, ordinance, or regulation and Withhold compliance durrng any proceeding, Includmg appropnate appeals, so long as Grantor has notlfred Lender In writIng prror to dOIng so and so long as, '" Lender's sole oplmon, Lender's IOterests In the Property are not Jeopardized Lender may require Grantor to post adequate security or a surety bond, reasonably satisfactory to Lender, to protect Lender's Interest Duty to Protect Grlmtor agrees neither to abandon or lellVe unattended the Property Grantor shall do all other acts, In addItIon to those acts set forth above In thIS section, which from the character and use of the Property are reasonably necessary to protect and preserve the Property DUE ON SALE -CONSENT BY LENDER Lender may, at Lender's option, IA) declare ImmedIately due and payable all sums secured by thiS Deed of Trust or (B) Increase the Interest rate prOVided for In the Note or other document eVidenCing the Indebtedness and Impose such other condrtlons as Lender deems appropnate, upon the sale or transter, Without lender's pnor wrrtten consent, of all or any part of the Real Proper:ty, or any Interest In the Aeal Property A "sale or "transfer" means the conveyance of Real Property or any nght, title or Interest In the Real Property, whether Ieg81, benefIcial or equitable, whether voluntary or Involuntary, whether by outnght sale, deed, Installment sale contract, land contract, contract for deed, leasehold Interest With a term greater than three (31 years, lease-optlon contract, or by sale, aSSIgnment, or transfer of any benefIcial Interest In or to any land trust holdIng tItle to the Real Property, or by any other method of conveyance of an Interest In the Real Property If any Grantor IS a corporation, partnership or limIted liabIlity company, transfer also Includes any change In ownership of more thiJn twenty-five percent (25%1 of the votmg stock, partnership Interests or hmlted "ability company Interests, as the case may be, of such Grantor However, thIS option shall not be exercised by Lender If such exercise IS prohibited by federal law or by WashJOgton law TAXES AND LIENS The follOWing prOVISions relating to the taxes and hens on the Property are part of thiS Deed of Trust Payment Grantor shall pay when due (and In all events pnor to delinquency) all taxes, speCial taxes, assessments, charges (IncludIng water and sewer). fines and ImpoSItions leVied against or on account of the Property, and shall pay when due all claims for work done on or for services rendered or matenal furnished to the Property Grantor shall maintain the Property free of all hens haVing prrorrty over or equal to the Interest of lender under thiS Deed of Trust, except for the lien of taxes and assessments not due and except as otherWise prOVIded In thiS Deed of Trust Right to Contest Grantor may withhold payment of any tax, assessment, or claIm In connection With a good faith dIspute over the obligatIon to pay, so long as Lender's Interest In the Property IS not Jeopardized If a lien anses or IS fIled as a result of nonpayment, Grantor shall Within fifteen (15) days after the Iren arises or, If a lien IS fded, WIthIn fIfteen (15) days after Grantor has notIce of the fdlng, secure the dIscharge of the iren, or .f requested by Lender, depoSit wrth lender cash or a suffiCient corporate surety bond or other secunty satIsfactory to Lender 10 an amount SuffiCient to dIscharge the hen plus any costs and attorneys' fees, or other charges that could accrue as a result of a foreclosure or sale under the Iren In any contest, Grantor shall defend Itself and Lender and shall satIsfy any adverse Judgment before enforcement against the Property Grantor shall name Lender as an additIonal obhgee under any surety bond furnIShed 11'1 the contest proceedlOgs EVidence of Payment Grantor shall upon demand furnish to Lender satisfactory eVIdence of payment of the taxes or assessments and shall authorize the appropriate governmental offiCial to deliver to Lender at any time a wrttten statement of the taxes and assessments a9alOst the Property Notice of Construction Grantor shall notIfy Lender at least fIfteen (15) days before any work IS commenced, any servIces are furnished, or any mateCials are supplied to the Property, If any mechaniC's hen, matenalmen's hen, or other lien could be asserted on account of the work, serVIces, or matenals Grantor will upon request of lender furnish to Lender advance assurances satIsfactory to Lender that Grantor can and WIll pay the cost of such Improvements PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE The follOWIng prOVISIOns relating to Insunng the Property are a part of thiS Deed of Trust Maintenance of Insurance Grantor shall procure and malOtalo poliCies of fife Insurance WIth standard extended coverage endorsements on a faIr value baSIS for the full ,nsurable value covermg all Improvements on the Real Property In an amount suffiCient to aVOId application of any cornsurance clause, and With a standard mortgagee clause ,n favor of Lender Grantor shall also procure and maIntain comprehenSIve generallrabllrty Insurance In such loan No: 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 4 coverage amounts as Lender may request with Trustee and Lender being named 8S additional Insureds In such liability Insurance poliCies Additionally, Grantor shall maintain such other Insurance, including but not IImrted to hazard. bUSiness interruption, and bOiler Insurance. as Lender may reasonably require PoliCies shall be written In form, amounts, coverages and baSIS reasonably acceptable to Lender and Issued by a company or companies reasonably acceptable to Lender Grantor, upon request of Lender. Will deliver to Lender from time to tame the poliCies or certificates of Insurance In form satisfactory to Lender,lncludlng stipulations that coverages Will not be cancelled or diminished Without at least ten (10) days prior wrrtten notice to Lender Each Insurance policy also shall tOclude an endorsement proViding that coverage In favor of Lender Will not be Impaired In any way by any act, omission or default of Grantor or any other person Should the Rllal Property be located In an area deSignated by the Dlfector of the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a special flood hazard area. Grantor agrees to obtain and maintain Federal Flood Insurance, If available, Within 45 days after notice IS given by Lender that the Property 1$ located In a special flood hazard area, for the full unpaid pnnclpal balance 0' the loan and any prior liens on the property securing the loan, up to the maximum policy limits set under the National Flood Insurance Program, or as otherwise required by Lender, and to maintain such Insurance for the term of the loan ApphcatlOn of Proceeds Grantor shall promptly notify Lender of ariy loss or damage to the Property Lender may make proof of loss If Grantor falls to do so wlthm fifteen (15) days of the casualty Whether' or not Lender's security IS Impaired, Lender may, at lender's election, receive and retam the proceeds of any Insurance and apply the proceeds to the reductIon of the Indebtedness, payment of any hen affecting the Property, or the restoratIOn and repair of the Property If Lender elects to apply the proceeds to re.storatloo and repair, Grantor shall reparr or replace the damaged or destroyed Improvements In a manner satisfactory to Lender Lender shall, upon satisfactory proof of such expenditure, payor reimburse Grantor from the proceeds for the reasonable cost of repair or restoration If Grantor IS not In default under thiS Deed of Trust Any proceeds which have not been disbursed Within 1 80 days after their receipt and which lender has not committed to the repair or restoration of the Property shall be used farst to pay any amount oWlng.to Lender under thiS Deed of Trust. then to pay accrued Interest. and the remainder, If any, shall be apphed to the principal balance of the Indebtedness If Lender holds any proceeds after payment In full of the Indebtedness,such proceeds shall be paid Without Interest to Grantor as Grantor's Interests may appear Grantors Report on Insurance Upon request of Lender, however not more than once a year. Grantor shall furntsh to Lender a report on each eXisting poliCY of Insurance shOWing (1) the name of the Insurer, (2) the risks Insured, (3) the amount of the policy, (4) . the property Insured, the then current replacement value of such property, and the manner 0' determlOing that value, arid (5) the eXPiration date of the polICY Grantor shall, upon request of Lender, have an Independent appraiser satisfactory to Lender determine the cash value replacement cost' of the Property . LENDER'S EXPENDITURES If any action or proceeding IS commencedth'at would materially affect Lender's Interest In the Property or If Grantor fSlls to comply With any prOVISion of thiS Deed of Trust or any Related Documents, including but not limited to Grantor's failure to discharge or pay when due any amounts Grantor IS reqUired to discharge or pay urlder thiS Deed of Trust or any Related Documents, Lender on Graritor's behalf may (but shall. not be obligated to) take any action that Lender deems appropnate, IOcludlng but not limited to dIscharging or paymg all taxes, liens, security Interests. encumbrances and other claims, at any tlmelevaed or placed on the Property and paymg all costs for Insuring, maintaining and preserving the Property All such expenditures Incurred or paid by Lender for such purposes will then bear Interest at the rate Charged under the Note from the ·date mcurred or paid by Lender to the date of repayment by Grantor All such expenses Will become a part of the Indebtedness. and, at lender's option, will (A) be payable on demand, (S) be added to the balance of the Note and be apportIoned among and be payable With any Installment payments to become due dUring either (1) the term orany applicable Insurance policy,or (2) the remamlng term of the Note, or (e) be treated as a balloon payment which Will be due and payable Ilt the Note's maturity The Deed of Trust also Will secure payment of these amounts Such right shall be In addition to all other TIghts and remedies to which Lender may be entitled upon Default WARRANTY, DEFENSE OF TITLE The followlOg provIsions relating to ownership of the Property are a part of thIS Deed of Trust TItle Grantor warrants that (a) Grantor holds good arid marketable title of record to the Property In fee Simple, free and clear of all hens and encumbrances other than those set forth In the Real Property deSCription or In any title Insurance policy, title report, or final title opinIOn Issued In favor ot. and accepted by, lender In connection With thiS Deed of Trust, and (b) Grantor has the full Tight. power, and authOrity to execute and deliver thiS Deed of Trust to Lender Defense of Title Subject to the exception In the paragraph above, Grantor warrants and Will forever defend the title to the Property agamst the lawful claims of all personsfn the event any action or proceeding IS commenced that questions Grantor's title or the Interest of Trustee or Lender under thIS Deed 01 Trust, Grantor shall defend the action at Grantor's expense Grantor may be the nommal party In such proceeding, but Lender shall be entitled to partiCipate In the proceed 109 and to be represented .In the proceeding by counsel of Lender's own chOICe, and Grantor will deliver, or cause to be delivered. to Lender such Instruments as Lender may request from time to tIme toO'6£6 ~OO~O ~OtOO~ ~> ~ -.. ".' loan No. 00001 to permit such participation DEED OF TRUST (Continued) 20040102001939.005 Page 5 Compliance With laws Grantor warrants that the Property and Grantor's use 01 the Property comphes With all eXIsting applICable laws, ordtnances, and regulations of governmental authOrities Survival of Representations and Warranties All representatIons, warrantIes, and agreements made by Grantor In thiS Deed of Trust shall survIve the execution and debvery of thIS Deed of Trust, shall be continuing In nature, and shall remaIn In full force and effect until such time as Grantor's Indebtedness shall be paid to full CONDEMNATION The followlOg prOVISions relating to condemnation proceedmgs are a part of thiS Deed of Trust Proceedtngs If any proceedIng In condemnation IS hied, Grantor shall promptly notIfy Lender m Wilting, and Grantor shall promptly take such steps as may be necessary to defend the action and obtain the award Grantor may be the nominal party m such proceeding, but lender shall be entitled to particIpate to the proceeding and to be represented In the proceeding by counsel of Its own chOice all at Grantor's expense, and Grantor Will deliver or cause to be delivered to Lender such Instruments and documentatIOn as may be requested by lender from tIme to time to permit such partrclpatlon ApplicatIOn of Net Proceeds 1.1 all or any part of the Property IS condemned by eminent domain proceedtngs or by any proceeding or purchase tn lieu of condemnation, Lender may at Its electIOn require that all or any portIOn of the net proceeds of the award be applied to the Indebtedness or the repair or restoration of the Property The net proceeds of the award shall mean the award after payment of all reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees Incurred by Trustee or Lender In connectron with the condemnation IMPOSITION OF TAXES. FEES AND CHARGES BY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES The follOWing prOVISIons relating to governmental taxes, tees and charges are a part of thiS Deed of Trust Current Taxes, Fees end Charges Upon request by Lender, Grantor shall execute such documents In addition to thiS Deed of Trust and take whatever other act Jon IS requested by lender to perfect and continue Lender's hen on the Real Property Grantor shall reimburse lender for all taxes, as descrtbed below, together With all expenses Incurred 10 recording. perfecting or continUIng thIS Deed of Trust, includIng WIthout limitation all taxes, fees, documentary stamps, and other charges for recording or reglstenng thiS Deed of Trust . Taxes The followtng shall constitute taxes to which thiS section applies 11) a speCifiC tax upon thiS type of Deed of Trust or upon all or any part of the Indebtedness secured by thIS Deed of Trust, (2) a speCifiC tax on Grantor whIch Grantor IS authortzed or reqUIred to deduct from payments on the Indebtedness secured by thIS type of Deed of Trust, (3) a tax on thIS type of Deed of Trust chargeable agaInst the Lender or the holder of the Note, and (4) a speCIfiC tax on all or·any portIon of the Indebtedness or on payments of prinCipal and Interest made by Grantor Subsequent Taxes If any tax to which thIS sectIon applies IS enacted subsequent to the date of thIS Deed 01 Trust, thiS event shall have the same effect as an Event of Default, and lender may exercIse any or aU of Its available remedies for an Event of Default as prOVided below unless Grantor either (1) pays the tax before It becomes delinquent, or (2) contests the tax as prOVided above In the Taxes and liens sectIon and depOSits With Lender cash or a suffiCient corporate surety bond or other secunty satIsfactory to Lender SECURITY AGREEMENT. FINANCING STATEMENTS The follOWing provIsions relattng to thiS Deed of Trust as a securtty agreement are a part of thIS Deed of Trust SecurIty Agreement ThiS Instrument shall constItute a Security Agreement to the extent any of the Property constitutes fixtures, and lender shall have all of the lights of a secured party under the Uniform CommerCial Code as amended from time to tllne Securrty Interest Upon request by Lender, Grantor shall execute fInanCIng statements and take whatever other action IS requested by lender to perfect and Continue Lender's secunty Interest In the Rents and Personal Property In addItion to recording thiS Deed of Trust In the real property records, Lender may, at any time and Without further authonzatlon from Grantor, file executed counterparts, copies or reproductions of thIS Deed of Trust as a 'Inanclng statement Grantor shall reimburse Lender for all expenses Incurred In perfecting or continuing thiS security Interest Upon default. Grantor shall not remove, sever or detach the Personal Property from the Property Upon default, Grantor shall assemble any Personal Property not affixed to the Propeny In a manner and at a place reasonably conventent to Grantor and Lender and make It available to Lender WIthIn three (3) days after receipt of written demand from lender to the extent permitted by applicable law Addresses The mailing addresses of Grantor (debtor) and Lender (secured party) from whIch InformatIon concerning the security Interest granted by thiS Deed of Trust may be obtained (each as reqUired by tha Untform CommerCIal Codel are as stated on the first page 01 thIS Deed of Trust FURTHER ASSURANCES, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT The follOWIng provIsIons relating to further assurances and attorneY-In-fact are a part of thts Deed of Trust Loan No: 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 6 Further Assurances At any time. and fro in time to time. upon request of Lender, Grantor will make. execute and deliver, or will Cause to be made, executed or delivered, to Lender or to lender's designee, and when requested by lender, cause to be filed. recorded, reflled. or rerecorded, as the case may be. at such times and In such offICes and places as lender may deem appropnate, any and all such mortgages. deeds of trust, security deeds, security agreements. finanCing statements, continuation statements, Instruments of further assurance, certificates, and other documents as may, In the sole opInion of Lender, be necessary or deSirable In order to effectuate. complete. perfect, continue. or preserve (11 Grantor'S obligations under the Note, thiS Deed of Trust, and the Related Documents, and (2) the hens and secunty Interests created by thiS Deed of Trust as first and prior liens on the Property, whether now owned or hereafter acquired by Grantor Unless prohibited by law or Lender agrees to the contrary In wrltmg, Grantor shall reimburse lender for all costs and expenses Incurred In connection with the matters referred to In thiS paragraph AnorneY-In-Fact If Grantor falls to do any of the things referred to In the preceding paragraph, lender may do so for and In the name of Grantor and at Grantor's expense For such purposes, Grantor hereby Irrevocably apPOints Lender as Grantor's attorneY-in-fact for the purpose of making, executing, delivering, flhng, recordmg, and dOing all other things as may be necessary or deSirable, 10 Lender's sole opinion, to accomplish the matters referred to In the preceding paragraph RJLL PERFORMANCE If Grantor pays all the Indebtedness. Including WithOUt limitation all future advances. when due, and otherWise performs all the obligations Imposed upon Grantor under thiS Deed of Trust, Lender shall execute and deliver to Trustee a request lor full reconveyance and shall execute and deliver to Grantor SUitable statements of termmatlon of any finanCing statement on file eVidenCing lender's security Interest In the Rents and the Personal Property Any reconveyance fee shall be paid by Grantor, If permitted by applicable law The grantee In any reconveyance may be deSCribed as the "person or persons legally entitled thereto", and the reCitals 10 the reconveyance of any matters or facts shall be conclUSive proof of the truthfulness of any such matters or facts EVENTS OF DEFAULT Each of the follOWing, at lender's option, shall constitute an Event of Default under thiS Deed of Trust Payment Default Grantor fatls to make any payment when due under the Indebtedness Other Defaults Grantor fads to comply With or to perform any other term, obligation, covenant or condition contained In thiS Deed of Trust or 10 any of the Related Documents or to comply With or to perform any term, obligation, covenant or conditIOn contained In any other agreement between Lender and Grantor Comp/lance Default Failure to comply With any other term, obligation, covenant or conditIOn contained In thiS Deed of Trust, the Note Of In any of the Related Documents If such a failure IS curable and If Grantor has not been given a notice of a breach of the same provIsion of thiS Deed of Trust wlthm the preceding twelve (12) months, It may be cured (and no Event of Default Will have occurred I If Grantor, after Lender sends written notice demanding cure of such failure (a) cures the failure Within thirty (30) days, or(bl If the cure reqUires more than thirty (30) days, Immediately initiates steps suffiCient to cure the failure and thereafter continues and completes all reasonable and necessary steps suffiCient to produce compliance as soon as reasonably practical Default on Other Payments Fal.lure of Grantor Within the time reqUired by thiS Deed of Trust to make any payment for taxes or Insurance, or any other payment necessary to prevent flhng of or to effect discharge of any Iten Default U1 Favor of Third Parties Should Grantor default under any /oa"n, extension of credit, secuflty agreement, purchase or sales agreement, or any other agreement, In favor of any other creditor or person that may materially affect any of Grantor's property or Grantor's ability to repay the Indebtedness or perform" their respectIve obligations under thiS Deed of Trust or any of the Related Documents False Statements Any warranty. representation or statement made or furnished to Lender by Grantor or on Grantor's behalf under thiS Deed of Trust or the Related Documents IS false or misleading In any matenal respect, either now or at the bme made or furnished or becomes false or misleading at any time thereafter Defective ColiaterahzatJon ThiS Deed of Trust or any of the Related Documents ceases to be In full force and effect (Including fadure of any collateral document to create a vahd and perfected secunty Interest or henl at any time and for any reason Insolvency The diSsolution or termination of Grantor'S eXistence as a gOing bUSiness, the Insolvency of Grantor. the apPointment of a receiver for any part of Grantor's property, any assignment for the benefit of creditors. any type of creditor workout, or the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or Insolvency laws by or against Grantor Creditor or Forfeiture Proceedangs Commencement of foreClosure or forfeiture proceedings, whether by JudiCial proceeding. self-help, repossession or any other method, by any creditor of Grantor or by any governmental agency against any property secunng the Indebtedness ThiS Includes a garnishment of any of Grantor's accounts, including depoSit accounts, With lender However, thiS Event of Default shall not apply If there IS a good faith dispute by Grantor as to the validity or reasonableness of the claim which IS the baSIS of the creditor or forfeiture .,' .. 900"6&6 ~OO~O ~O~O~ " '-..:"" Loan No' 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) , •• .--...... F 20040102001939.007 Page 7 proceeding and If Grantor gives Lender wrrtten notice of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and deposrts With Lender mOilles or a surety bond for the creditor or forfeiture proceeding, In an amount determined by Lender, In Its sale discretion, as being an adequate reserve or bond for the dispute Breach of Other Agreement Any breach by Grantor under the terms of any other agreement between Grantor and Lender that IS not remedied within any grace penod provided therein, including without limitation any agreement concerOing any Indebtedness or other obhgatlon of Grantor to Lender, whether eXisting now or later Events Affecting Guarantor Any of the preceding events occurs with respect to any Guarantor of any of the Indebtedness or any Guarantor dies or becomes Incompetent, or revokes or disputes the validity of, or habliity under, any Guaranty of the fndebtedness In the event of a death, Lender, at Its option, may, but shalf not be reqUired to, permit the Guarantor'S estate to assume unconditIOnally the obhgatlons arising under the guaranty In a manner satisfactory to Lender, and, In dOing so, cure any Event of Default Adverse Change . A matenal adverse change occurs In Grantor's financial COndition, or Lender beheves the prospect of payment or performance of the Indebtedness IS ImpalTed Insecunty Lender In good faith beheves Itself Insecure Right to Cure If such a failure IS curable and If Grantor has not been gIven a notice of a breach of the same prOVISion of thiS Deed of Trus1 Within the preceding twelve (12) months, It may be cured (and no Event of Default Will have occurred) If Grantor, after Lender sends written notIce demanding cure of such failure (al cures the failure Within thirty (301 days, or (bl If the cure reqUires more than thirty (30) days, Immediately Initiates steps suffiCient to cure the failure and thereafter continues and compfetes all reasonable and necessary steps suffiCIent to produce comphance as soon as reasonably practical RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ON DEFAULT If an Event of Default occurs. under thiS Deed of Trust, at any time thereafter, Trustee or Lender may exercise anyone or more of the follOWing rights and remedies Election of RemedIes Election by Lender to pursue any remedy shall not exclude purSUit of any other remedy, and an election to make expenditures or to take action to perform an obligation of Grantor under th,s Deed of Trust, after Grantor's failure to perform, shall neit affect Lender's Tight to declare a default and exercise Its remedies Aeee.lerate Indebtedness Lender shall have the rIght at ItS option to declare the emlTe Indebtedness Immed,ately due and payabfe. Including any prepayment penalty which Grantor would be reqUITed to pay. Foreclosure With respect to all or any part of the Real Property, the Trustee shall have the nght to exercise Its power of safe and to foreclose by notice and sale, and Lender shalt have the nght to foreclose by JudiCial foreclosure, In either case In accordance WIth and to the futl extent prOVided by applicable law uee Remedies With respect to all or any ·part of the Personal Property, Lender shall have all the nghts and remedIes of a secured party under the Uniform CommerCial Code Collect Rents Lender shall have the TIght, Without notice to Grantor to take posseSSion of and manage the Property and collect the Rents. including amounts past due and unpaid, and apply the net proceeds, over and above Lender's costs, against the Indebtedness In furtherance of thiS TIght, lender may reqUire any tenant or other user of the Property to make payments of rent or use fees directly to Lender If the Rents are collected by Lender, then Grantor Irrevocably deSIgnates Lender liS Grantor's attorney-m-fact to endorse Instruments received In payment thereof In the name of Grantor and to negotiate the same and colfect the proceeds Payments by tenants or other users to Lender In response to Lender's demand shall satisfy the obhgatlons for which the payments are made, whether or not any proper grounds for the demand eXisted Lender may exen,lse Its lights under thIS subparagraph either," person, by agent, or through a receiver AppOint Receiver Lender shall have the TIght to have a receiver apPOinted to take possession of alt or any part of the Property, With the power to protect and preserve the Property, to operate the Property preceding or pending foreclosure or safe, and to conect the Rents from the Property and apply the proceeds, over and above the cost of the receivership, against the Indebtedness The receiver may serve Without bond If permitted by ·Iaw Lender's nght to the apPointment of a receiver shalt eXist whether or not the apparent value of the Property exceeds the Indebtedness by a substantial amount Employment by Lender shall not dIsqualify a person from serving as a receiver Tenancy at Sufferance If Grantor remains In possession of the Property after the Property IS sold as prOVIded above or Lender otherWise becomes entItled to posseSSion of the Property upon default of Grantor, Grantor shall become a tenant at sufferance of Lender or the purchaser of the Property and shall, at Lender's option, either (1) pay a reasonable rental for the use of the Property, or (21 vacate the Property unmedlately upon the demand of Lender Other Remedies Trustee or Lender shall have any other right or remedy prOVided In thiS Deed of Trust or the Note or by law loan No: 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 8 Notice of Sale Lender shall give Grantor reasonable notice of the time and place of any public sale of the Personal Property or of the time after which any prrvate sale or other Intended diSposition of the Personal Property 1$ to be made Reasonable notice shall mean notice given at least ten (10) days before the time of the sale or dispositIOn Any sale of the Personal Property may be made In conjunction with any sale of the Real Property Sale of the Property To the extent permitted by applicable law, Grantor hereby waives any and a/l rights to have the Property marshalled In exercISing ItS fights and remedies, the Trustee or Lender shall be free to sell all or any part of the Property together or separately, In one sale or by separate sales Lender shall be entitled to bid at any publiC sale on all or any portion of the Property Attorneys' Fees, Expenses If Lender institutes any SUit or action to enforce any of the terms of thiS Deed of Trust. Lender shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fees at tnal and upon any appeal Whether or not any court action IS Involved. and to the extent not prohibited by law, all reasonable expenses Lender rncurs that In Lender's oplnron are necessary at any time for the protection of ItS Interest or the enforcement of Its rrghts shall become a part of the Indebtedness payable on demand and shall bear Interest at the Note rate from the date of the expenditure until repaid Expenses covered by thiS paragraph Include, Without Ilmltatlon, however subject to any limits under apphcable law, Lender's attorneys' fees and Lender's legal expenses, whether or not there IS a laWSUit, Including attorneys' fees and expenses for bankruptcy proceedings (Including efforts to modify or vacate any automatic stay or IIl/Unctlon), appeals, and any antiCipated Post1udgmenl collection services, the cost of searching records, obtaining Ittle reports (Including foreclosure reports), surveyors' reports, and appraisal tees; title Insurance, and fees for the Trustee, to the extent permitted by applicable law Grantor also Will pay any court costs, In addition to all other sums prOVided by law Rights of Trustee Trustee shall have all of the rrghts and duties of lender as set ,forth In thiS section POWERS AND OBLIGATIONS OF TRUSTEE The follOWing provIsions relatrng to the powers and obligations 01 Trustee (pursuant to Lender's Instructions) are part of thiS Deed of TJust Powers of Trustee In addition to all powers of Trustee arrslng as a matter of law, Trustee shall have the power to take the follOWing actions With respect to the Property upon the wntten request of lender and Grantor (a) lOin In preparrng and filing a map or plat of the Real Property, Includrng the dedication of streets or other nghts to the publiC, (b) JOin In grantrng any easement or creating any restrrctlon on the Real Property, and (c) JOin In any subordll'latlon or other agreement affecting thiS Deed of Trust or the IOteres! of Lender under thiS Deed of Trust Obltgatlons to Nottfy Trustee shall not be obhgated to notify any other party of a pendmg sale under any other trust deed or lien, or of any action or proceeding In which Grantor, lender, or Trustee shall be a party, unless required by applicable law, or unless the action or proceeding IS brought by Trustee ) Trustee Trustee shall meet all qualifications reqUired lor Trustee under applicable law In addition to the rrghts and remedies set forth above, With respect to all or any part of the Property, the Trustee shall have the rrght to foreclose by notice and sale. and Lender shall have the nght to foreclose ,by JudiCial foreclosure, rn either case rn accordance With and to the full extent prOVided by applicable law Successor Trustee Lender, at Lender's option, may from time to tIme appornt a successor Trustee to any Trustee appomted under thiS Deed of Trust by an mstrument executed and acknowledged by Lender and recorded In the office of the recorder of KING County, State of Washmgton The Instrument shall contam, rn addition to all other matters reqUired by state law, the names of the onglOal Lender, Trustee, and Grantor, the book and page or the Auditor's File Number where thiS Deed of Trust IS recorded, and the name and address' of the successor trustee, and the Instrument shall be executed and acknowledged by Lender or ItS successors In Interest The successor trustee, Without conveyance of the Property, shall succeed to all the title, power, and duties conferred upon the Trustee In thiS Deed of Trust and by applicable law ThiS procedure lor substitution of Trustee shall govern to the exclUSion of all other prOVISions for substitution NOTICES Subject to apphcable law, and except for notice reqUired or allowed by law to be given In another manner, any notice reqUIred to be given under thiS Deed of Trust, rncludlng Without limitation any notice of defaUlt and any notIce of sale shall be given In Writing, and shall be effective when actually delrvered, when actually received by telefacslmde (unless otherWise' reqUITed by law), when depOSited With a nationally recognized overnight couner, or, If mailed, when depOSited In the United States mali, as first class, certified or registered mall postage prepaid, directed to the addresses shown near the beglOmng of thiS Deed of Trust All caples of notices of foreclosure from the holder of any hen which has prtorrty over thiS Deed of Trust shall be sent to Lender's address, as shown near the begmnlng of thiS Deed of Trust Any party may change Its address for notices under thiS Deed of Trust by giving formal wrrtten notice to the other parties, speCifYing that the purpose of the notice IS to change the party's address For notice purposes, Grantor agrees to keep lender Informed at all times of Grantor's current address Subject to apphcable law, and except for notice reqUired or allowed by law to be given rn another manner, If there IS more than one Grantor, any notice given by lender to any Grantor IS deemed to be notice given to all Grantors ' MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS The followrng miscellaneous prOVISionS are a part of thiS Deed of Trust aOO'6t6 ~OO~O ~OtoO~ ',,-,j ~'-." loan No. 00001 DEED OF TRUST ( Continued) 20040102001939.009 Page 9 Amendments This Deed of Trust, together with any'Related Documents, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties as to the matters sct forth In this Deed of Trust No alteration of or amendment to thiS Deed of Trust shan be effective unless given In wntlng and Signed by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendment Annual Reports If the Property IS used for purposes other than Grantor's reSidence, Grantor shall furnish to Lender, upon request, a certified statement of net operating sncome received from the Property dunng Grantor's prevIous fiscal year In such form and detad as Lender shall requIre "Net operatIng Income" shall mean all cash receipts from the Property less all cash expendItures made In connection with the operation of the Property Caption Headmgs Caplton headings sn thiS Deed of Trust are for convenience purposes only and are not to be used to Interpret or define the prOVISions of thiS Deed of Trust Merger There shall be no merger of the Interest or estate created by thIS Deed of Trust with any other Interest or estate In the Property at any time held by or for the benefIt of Lender In any capacity, without the wntten consent of lender GovernIng Law ThiS Deed of Trust Will be governed by. construed and enforced In accordance with federallBw and the laws of the State of Washington ThiS Deed of Trust has been accepted by Lender In the State of Washmgton ChOice of Venue If there IS a lawsurt, Grantor agrees upon Lender's request to submIt to the junsdlctlon of the courts of KING County, State of Washington No Waiver by Lender Lender shall not be deemed to have waIved any lights under thiS Deed of Trust unless such waiver IS given In wntlOg and SIgned by Lender No delay or omISSion on the part 01 lender In exercIsIng any fight shall operate as a waiver of such fight or any other right A waIver by Lender of a prOVISion of thIS Deed of Trust shall not prejudIce or constItute a waIver of lender's right otherWIse to demand strict compliance with that prOVISIon or any other prOVISIon of thiS Deed of Trust No pnor waiver by Lender. nor any course of dealing between Lender and Grantor, shall constitute a waIver of any of Lender's rights or of any of Grantor's obligations as to any future transactIOns Whenever the consent of Lender IS requIred under thIS Deed of Trust. the granttng of such consent by Lender In any Instance shall not constItute continuIng consent to subsequent Instances where such consent IS required and In all cases such consent may be granted or Withheld In the sole discretIon of Lendor Severability If a court of competent JUrisdIctIOn fmds any prOViSion of thIS Deed of Trust to be Illegal. Invahd, or unenforceable as to any Circumstance. that flndmg shall not make the offendsng prOVISion Illegal, mvalld. or unenforceable as to any other circumstance If feaSIble, the offending provISion shall be conSidered modified so that It becomes legal. valid and enforceable If the offendIng prOVISion cannot be so modified, It shall be conSIdered deleted from thiS Deed of Trust Unless otherWise reqUired by law. the °llfegallty. Invahdlty. or unenforceablhty of any provIsIon of thIS Deed of Trust shall not affect the legality. validIty or enforceabIlity of any other prOVISIon of thIS Deed of Trust Successors and ASSigns Subject to any limItatIOns stated In thiS Deed of Trust on transfer of Grantor's '"terest. thIS Deed of Trust shall be bsndlOg upon and Inure to the benefit of the partIes. thelf successors and assigns If ownership of the Property becomes vested ma person other than Grantor. Lender, Without notIce to Grantor. may deal With Grantor's successors WIth reference to thiS Deed of Trust and the Indebtedness by way of forbearance or extensIon WIthout releaSIng Grantor from the obligatIons of thiS Deed of Trust or liabilIty under the jndebtedness Time IS of the Essence Time IS of the essence sn the performance of thiS Deed of Trust Waive Jury All parties to thiS Deed of Trust hereby waive the nght to any Jury tnalln any aetton. proceeding. or counterclaim brought by any party ag8105t any other party Waiver of Homestead Exemption Grantor hereby releases and waives all nghts and benefits of the homestead exemptIon laws of the State of WashIngton as to all Indebtedness secured by thiS Deed of Trust DEANITIONS The follOWIng capltahzed words and terms shall have the follOWIng meaOlngs when used In thiS Deed of ' Trust Unless speCifIcally stated to the contrary. all references to dollar amounts shall mean amounts In lawful money of the United States of Amertca Words and terms used tn the Singular shall Inelude the plural, and the plural shall Include the Singular, as the context may reqUire Words and terms not otherWise defmed In thIS Deed of Trust shall have the meanings attrtbuted to such terms m the Uniform Commercial Code BenefiCiary The word "Beneftclary" means COLUMBIA STATE BANK. and ItS successors and assigns Borrower The word "Borrower" means MCLENDON HARDWARE. INC and mcludes all co,slgnars and co':makers sl9nsn9 the Note Deed of Trust The words "Deed of Trust" mean thIS Deed of Trust among Grantor. lender. and Trustee. and tncludes Without limItation all assIgnment and secunty Interest provISIons relating to the Personal Property and Rents Loan No 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) Page 10 Default The word "Defau!t" means the Default set forth 10 thiS Deed of Trust In the section titled "Default" Event of Default The words "Event of Default" mean any of the events of default set forth In thiS Deed of Trust In the events of default section of thiS Deed of Trust Grantor The word "Grantor" means MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC Guarantor The word "Guarantor" means any guarantor, surety, or accommodation party of any or all of the Indebtedness Guaranty The word "Guaranty" means the guaranty from Guarantor to Lender, including without limitatIon a guaranty of all or part of the Note Improvements The word "Improvements" means all eXisting and future Improvements, bUildings, structures, mobile homes affixed on the Real Property, facilities, addItions, replacements and other construction on the Real Property Indebtedness The word "Indebtedness· means all principal, Interest, and other amounts, costs and expenses payable under the Note or Related Documents, together with all renewals of, extensions of, modifications of, consolidations of and substrtuilons for the Note or Related Documents and any amounts expended or advanced by lender to discharge Grantor's obligations or expenses Incurred by Trustee or lender to enforce Grantor's obligations under thiS Deed of Trust, together wIth Interest on such amounts as prOVided In thiS Deed of Trust SpeCifically, without hmltatlon, Indebtedness Includes the future advances set forth In the Future Advances prOVISion, together with all Interest thereon and all amounts that may be Indirectly secured .by the Cross-Collateralizatlon prOVISIOn of thiS Deed of Trust Lender The word '"Lender" means COLUMBIA STATE BANK, Its successors and assigns Note The word "Note'" means the promissory note dated December 29,' 2003, In the original prinCIpal amount of $3,000,000 00 from Grantor to Lender, together with all renewals of. extenSions of, modifications of, refinanCings of, consohdatlons of, and Substitutions for the promls.sory note or agreement NOTICE TO GRANTOR THE NOTE CONTAINS A VARIABLE INTEREST RATE Personal Property The words ·Personal Property" mean ali equipment, fixtures, and other articles of personal property now or hereafter owned by Grantor, and now or hereafter attached or affixed to the Real Property, together with all acceSSions, parts, and additions to, all replacements of, and all substitutIOns for, any of such property, and together with all Issues and profrts thereon and proceeds /Including without limitation all Insurance proceeds and refunds of premiums) from any sale or other diSPOSition of the Property Property The word '"Property· means collectively the Real Property and the Personal Property Real Property The words "Real Property· mean the real property, Interests and fIghts, as further desCribed 10 thiS Deed of Trust Related Documents The words "Related Documents· mean all promissory notes, credit agreements; loan agreements, guaranties, security agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust, securrty deeds, collateral mortgages, and all other Instruments, agreements and documents, whether now or hereafter eXisting, executed In COMeCtiOn with the Indebtedness, proVided, that the environmental IndemOlty agreements are not "Related Documents" and are not secured by thiS Deed of Trust Rent~The word "Rents" means all present and future rents, revenues, Income, Issues, royalties, profits, and other benefits deflved from the Property Trustee The word "Trustee· means TRANSNATION TITlE INSURANCE, whose mailing address 1514450 NE 29TH PLACE, SUITE 200, BEllEVUE, WA. 98007 and any substitute or successor trustees O~O·6£6 ~OOZ;O 1.0tOOZ; '--.. • , .... >.- Loan No' 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) 20040102001939.011 Page 11 GRANTOR ACKNOWlEDGES HAVING READ ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DEED OF TRUST, AND GRANTOR AGREES TO ITS TERMS GRANTOR MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC STATE OF U~sh \ t.£)+" l"... COUNTYOF __ ~~~:~~ __ ~~ __________ _ ) S8 I On this 'b , ~ day of ~:(. c. .e """",b.er" . 20 C> ~ • before me, the underSigned Notary PublIC. personally appeared GAIL R MCLENDON. President of MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC. and personally known to me or proved to me on the baSIS of satisfactory eVidence to be an authorized agent of the corporation that executed the Deed of Trust and acknowledged the Deed of Trust to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the corporation, by authortty of Its Bylaws or by resolution of Its board of directors, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he or she IS authOrized to execute this Deed of Trust and In fact executed the Deed :: T,~' 00 .h,,. °""·1;0::; R .... 'o •• , ~_ .(f.,_ .. _f....,lJ-__ lie In and for Ltate of W &..S~\ U)+ -My commiSSion expires -E..~ ,,/0 t-f GA YNELL ;JONrJ .... -.... """-' ...... Loan No: 00001 DEED OF TRUST (Continued) .... -\,--'{,,,,'t " IJ ", Page 12 ; ,'(:> :-,G. ", " ,,~ \. , "I <"::-'-; ,-, ~ , '-' /', CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT "J ;., ~ rJ) I STATE OF J~lD..sb, tJ3+~ ,COUNTY OF ~ " t.,...>s, " <..i"\ .. IIJt I -::. , 'I )/' ,J, , . ~ \ ._\' i2' ~ ISS: 'v -_,0 ::- ',\ ~' l' , \ \-~\ , "'., ~~-~.~~~~~.~ On this 3 \ M-day of b~G ~~.e.W"'"' , 2003 ' before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared MICHAEL 0 MCLENDON, Secretary of MCLENDON HARDWARE. INC, and personally known to me or proved to me on the baSIS of satisfactory eVidence to be an authorized agent of the corporation that executed the Deed of Trust and acknowledged the Deed of Trust to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the corporation, by authority of Its Bylaws or by resolution of Its board of directors, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated that he or she IS authorized to execute this Deed of Trust and In fact executed the Deed of Twst on behalf of the corporation Notary Publ~ In ant( for the State of ~ 4. S h '. tv 5 {"'"'-" ReSiding at k: k'j c~v'" Ir= My commission expires a VI 010 L{ I t~r,\l;r~i-;! " ,'1!"-.I ..... -=. 1S ;i~~'.' '. ~ ~ REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE To __ _ ________________________________ ,' Trustee The undersigned IS the legal owner and holder of all mdebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust You are hereby requested, upon payment of a/l sums oWIng to you, to reconvey Without warranty, to the persons entitled thereto, the' TIght, title and .nterest now held by you under the Deed of Trust Date BenefiCiary _________________ _ By Its _________ _ lAUR p~ L.ndnQ VO' 6 22 20 OOJ C4pf Hatlw.d ''''Me .. $.1tI,*" ,1"0 1,,1 200l AI AoQtIta A~ Wit. C \Crnt,PL\GOI rc 1R 2D\42 m.z ~~O·6~6~()O~O~OVOO~ ' ... -'~ EXHIBIT "Au LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A A portIon of the Henry H. Tobm Donation Claim No. 37 m SectIon IS, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M, m Kmg County, Washmgton descnbed as follows' 20040102001939.013 Commencmg at the Northwest corner of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to plat recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, records ofKmgCounty, whIch corner bears South 89°07' East 3() feet and North 0046'East 530 feet from the Monument at the mtersectIon of Second Avenue and Burnett Street; thence North 0°46' East 275 feet to the pomt ofhegmmng, thence North 0°46' East 76.52 feet, thence South 89°07' East 115 feet, thence South 0°46' West 76.54 feet; thence North 89° 07' West 115 feet to the pomt of beg inn mg. PARCELB A portIon of the Henry H Tobm DonatlOn ClaIm No 37 m SectIon 18, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W M, m King County, Washmgton descnbed as follows: -Begmnmg on the east margm of Burnett Street 10 the City of Renton North 00° 40' East 730 feet from the centerhne of Second Avenue; thence south 89° 07' East 115 feet, thence North 00°46' East 75 feet; thence South 89°07' West 115 feet; thence South 0° 46' West 75 feet to the pomt ofbegmmng. PARCELC A portion of the Henry H. Tobin Donahon Chum No. 37 m Sectlon 18, Township 23 . North, Range 5 East. W.M , m Kmg County, Washmgton descnbed as follows Beginnmgat a point on the East hne of Burnett Street 150 feet north of the Northwest comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat recorded 10 Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135,10 Kmg County, Washmgton; runnmg thence East parallel With the North hne of saId Block 24 a dIstance of 115 feet; thence North parallel With the East line Burnett Street 50 feet, thence West parallel WIth the North hne of said Block 24 a dIstance of 115 feet to the East lme of Burnett Street, thence South on the East lme of Burnett Street 50 feet to the pomt of begtnning Page 10f3 . ' ,.--., .;:-...... ... ,' PARCELD A portIon of the Henry H. Tobm Donation Chum No 37 m Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W M, m Kmg County, Washington descnbed as follows' 20040102001939.014 Commencmg at the Northwest comer of Block 24. the Town of Renton Plat, which corner bears South 89°01' East. a dIstance of30 feet and North 0°46' East, a dIstance of 530 feet from the monument at the mtersection of Second Avenue and Burnett Street, thence North 0° 46' East a dIstance of 150 feet; thence South 89° 07' East a dIstance of 115 feet; thence South 0°46' West a dIstance of 150 feet, thence North 89°07' West a dIstance of 115 feet to the pomt ofbeglIllllng. Also, Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat recorded m . Volume 1 ofplats, page 135, In King County, Washington, except the East 5 feet thereof conveyed to the City of Renton for alley purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's FIle No. 2117471 and 2117484. Also, Lots 16 and 17, Block 24 Town of Renton, accordmg to plat recorded In Volume I of Plats, page 135, In Kmg County, WashIngton, together WIth the Easterly portIon of vacated alley adJommg on the West, as vacated by the CIty of Renton under Ordmance No 3272 PARCELE A portIOn of the Henry H. Tobm DonatIOn ClaIm No 37 In SectIon 18, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M , In Kmg County, Washmgton descnbed as follows: Begmmng at a pomt on the Westerly hne ofWllhams Street 100 feet Northerly from the Northeast comer of Block 24 of Town of Renton, accordmg the plat recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, thence North 0°46' East along the Westerly Ime ofWllhams Street, 50 feet; thence North 89°07' West 115 feet; thence South 0°46' West 50 feet; thence South 89° 07' East 115 feet to the pomt ofbegmmng. Page 2 of3 ",~"" - ."";:" PARCEL F A portIon of the Henry H. Tobm DonatIon Claim No. 37 III SectIon 18, TownshIp 23 - North, Range 5 East, W M, m Kmg County, WashIngton descnbed as follows: 20040102001939.015 Begmrung at the Northeast comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135; thence Northerly on the Easterly Ime of said Block 24, produced, 250 feet to the true pomt ofbegmnmg of the tract herem descnbed; thence contmumg Northerly on said Easterly lme of said Block 24, produced, 101.52 feet, thence Westerly parallel to the Northerly hne of said Block 24, 115 feet, thence Southerly parallel to sald Easterly Ime of Block 24 produced northerly 101 52 feet; thence Easterly, parallel to saId Northerly hne of saId Block 24, 115 feet to the true point of begmnmg, Except the North 50 feet thereof PARCELG That portIOn Of the Northwest quarter of SectIOn 17, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M., m Kmg County, descnbed as follows. Begmmng at the Northeast comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat thereof recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In KmgCounty, Washmgton' Thence North along the Northerly productIon of the East lme of saId Block, a distance of 203 feet to the True Pomt of~egmnmg, thence contmumg North along srud East hne produced, a dIstance of 47 feet; thence West parallel to the North hne of Block 24, a dIstance of 115 feet; thence South 47 feet, thence East parallel to the North line of Block 24, a distance of 115 feet to the True Pomt ofBegmnmg. - PARCELH Lot 18, Block 24, Town of Renton accordmg the to plat thereof recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In King County, Washmgton, Except the West 5 feet thereof conveyed to the CIty of Renton for alley purposes by deed recorded under Recordmg no 2117478 Page 3 of3 - ,"~. RETURN ADDRESS: COLUMBIA STATE BANK LOAN OPERATIONS MS-6120 1102 BROADWAY PLAZA TACOMA, WA 98402 SOO-Il)377d5 (o75~P 20040102001940.001 ""~-"":". ". III~ 1111111-11111 20040102001940 TRANSNATION TI ASNR 29 08 PAGEte1 OF 811 91/82/2884 14.27 KING COUNTY. UA ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS Reference # (~Pltcable) __________ _ AdditIOnal on page _ Grantor{s) . . 1 MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC Grantee's) 1 COLUMBIA STATE BANK legal DeSCription A POR OF HENRY H TOBIN DONATION ClM #37, SEC 18, T 23 N, R 5 E, W M IN KING COUNTY <\-11 Additional on page )f Assessor's Tax Parcel 10# 7231502030, 0007200154, 7231502085, 7231502120, 0007200139,0007200130,0007200109,0007200156,0007200104 THIS ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS dated December 29, 2003, is made and executed between MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC •• A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 710 S SECOND ST. RENTON WA 98055 (referred to below as "Grantor") and COLUMBIA STATE BANK, whose mailing address is 504 W. MEEKER. KENT. WA 98032 (referred to below as "lender") FtlEO fOR RECORD AT THE Rf.OUEST (f 'fRANSNATION TITLE: INSu~M!Cf GO. Loan No 00001 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS (Continued) Page 2 ASSIGNMENT For valuable consideration, Grantor hereby assigns, grants a contmuing security interest In, and conveys to Lender all of Grantor's right, title, and Interest in and to the Rents from the following described Property located in KING County, State of Washington: See ATTACHED EXHIBIT "Aft FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION, which is attached to this Assignment and made a part of this Assignment as If fully set forth herein. The Property or its address IS commonly known as 104 & 82 BURNETT AVE S, 710 S 2ND ST, 111, 79, 81,91 WILLIAMS AVE S; 7075 S TOBIN ST, RENTON, WA 98055, The Property tax identification number IS 7231502030, 0007200154,7231502085,7231502120, 0007200139.0007200130,0007200109,0007200156,0007200104 CROSS-COLLA TERAUZA TlON In additIOn to the Note,. this Assignment secures all obligatIOns, debts and hablhtles, plus Interest thereon, of Grantor to Lender, or anyone or more of them, as well as all claims by Lender against Grantor or anyone or more of them, whether now eXlsllng or hereafter arising, whether related or unrelated to the purpose of the Note, whether voluntary or otherWise. whether due or not due, direct or IndJrect, determined or undetermined, absolute or contingent, liqUidated or uohqUidated whether Grantor may be hable individually or JOintly With others, whether obhgated as guarantor, surety, accommodation party or otherWise, and whether recovery upon such amounts may be or hereafter may become barred by <Jny statute of limitations, and whether the obligation to repay such amounts may be or hereafter may become otherWise unenforceable FUTURE ADVANCES SpeCifically, Without lImitatIon, this ASSignment secures, '" addition to the amounts specified m the Note, all future amounts Lender In ItS discretion may loan to Grantor, together With all Intcrest thereon THIS ASSIGNMENT IS GIVEN TO SECURE (11 PAYMENT OF THE INDEBTEDNESS AND (2) PERFORMANCE OF ANY AND ALL OBLIGATIONS OF GRANTOR UNDER THE NOTE, THIS ASSIGNMENT. AND THE RELATED DOCUMENTS THIS ASSIGNMENT IS GIVEN AND ACCEPTED ON THE FOLLOWING TERMS PA YMENT AND PERFORMANCE Except as otherWise provIded In thiS ASSignment or any Related Documents, Grantor shall pay to Lender all amounts secured by thIS ASSignment as they become due, and shall strictly perform all of Grantor's obligatIOns under this ASSignment Unless and until Lender exercises Its fight to collect the Rents as provided below and so long as there IS no default under thiS ASSignment, Grantor may remain m possession and control of and operate and manage the Property and collect the Rents, proVIded that the granting of the reght to collect the Rents shall not constitute lender's consent to the use of cash collateral en a bankruptcy proceeding GRANTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Grantor warrants that Ownership Grantor IS entitled to receive the Rents free and clear of all fights, loans, hens, encumbrances, and claims except as disclosed to and accepted by Lender In wflhng Right to ASSIgn Grantor has the full rrght, power and authonty to enter Into thiS ASSignment and to assign and convey the Rents to Lender No Pnor ASSignment Grantor has not preViously aSSigned or conveyed the Rents to any other person by any Instrument now In force No Further Transfer Grantor Will not sell, assign, encumber, or otherWise dispose of any of Grantor's rights In the Rents except as prOVided In thiS ASSignment LENDER'S RIGHT TO RECEIVE AND COLLECT RENTS Lender shall have the right at any time, and even though no default shall have occurred under thiS ASSignment, to collect and receive the Rents For thiS purpose, lender IS hereby given and granted the follOWing rights, powers and authorrty Notice to Tenants Lender may send notices to any and all tenants of the Property adVISing them of thiS ASSignment and directing all Rents to be paid dIrectly to lender or lender's agent Enter the Property Lender may enter upon and take possession of the Property, demand, collect and receive from the tenants or from any other persons hable therefor, all of the Rents, institute and carryon all legal proceedings necessary for the protection of the Property, Includmg such proceedings as may be necessary to recover possession of the Property, collect the Rents and remove any tenant or tenants or other persons from the Property Mamtam the Property Lender may enter upon the Property to malntaen the Property and keep the same In repair, to pay the costs thereof and of all services of all employees, mcludmg thelf eqUipment,and of all continuIng costs and ex'penses of malntalOing the Property In proper repair and condition, and also to pay all taxes, assessments and water utliltles, and the premiums on fire and other IOsurance effected by Lender on the Property too'01'6 ~ootO ~OPOOt ~,-, . .'.,.~ :;'":. ~~~/ ~.' Loan No: 00001 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS (Continued) 20040102001940,003 Page 3 Compliance with Laws Lender may do any and all thmgs to execute and comply with the laws of the State of Washington and also all other laws. rules. orders. ordinances and reqUirements of all other governmental agenCies affecting the Property Lease the Property Lender may rent or lease the whole or' any part of the Property for such term or terms and on such conditions as Lender may deem appropriate Employ Agents Lender may engage such agent or agents as Lender may deem appropriate. Clther In Lender's name or In Grantor's name. to rent and manage the Property. Including the collection and application of Rents Other Acts Lender may do all such other things and acts With respect to the Property as Lender m'ay deem appropnate and may act exclUSively and solely In the place and 'stead of Grantor and to have all of the powers of Grantor for the purposes stated above No Requirement to Act Lender shall not be reqUIred to do any of the foregOing acts or'thlngs. and the fact that lender shall have performed one Or more of the foregOing acts or things shall not require Lender to do any other speCific act or thing APPLICATION OF RENTS All costs and expenses Incurred by Lender In connection With the Property shaH be for Grantor's account and Lender may pay such costs and expenses from the Rents lender. In Its sole discretIon. shall determine the application of any and all Rents receIved by It. however. any such Rents received by Lender which are not applied to such costs and expenses shall be applied to the Indebtedness All expenditures made by lender under thiS ASSIgnment and not reImbursed from the Rents shall become a part of the Indebtedness secured by thIS ASSignment. and sholl be payable on demand. with Interest at the Note rate from date of expenditure until paid FULL PERFORMANCE If Grantor pays all of the Indebtedness when due and otherWise performs all the obligatIOns Imposed upon Grantor under thiS ASSignment. the Note. and the Related Documents. Lender shall execute and deliver to Grantor a SUitable satisfaction of thiS ASSignment and suitable statements 01 termlnallon of any financing statement on file eVldencmg Lender's security Interest In the Rents and the Property Any termination fee reqUired by law shall be paid by Grantor. If permitted by applicable law ' LENDER'S EXPENDITURES II any action or proceeding IS commenced that would matenally affect Lende(s Interest In the Property or If Grantor fa tis to comply With any provIsion of thiS ASSignment or any Related Documents. including but not limited to Granlor's failure to discharge or pay when due any amounts Grantor IS reqUIred to discharge or pay under thiS ASSIgnment or any Related Documents. Lender on Grantor's behalf may (but shall not be' obligated to) take any actIOn that Lender deems appropnate. including but not limited to discharging' or paYing all taxes. liens. security Interests. encumbrances and other claims. at any time leVied or placed on the Rents or the Property and paying all costs for Insu"ng. maintaining and preserving the Property All such expenditures Incurred or paid by Lender for such purposes Will then bear Interest at the rate charged under the Note from the date Incurred or paid by Lender to the date of repayment by Grantor All such expenses Will become a part of the Indebtedness and. at Lender's option. Will (A) be payable on demand. (B) be added to the balance of the Note and be apportioned among and be payable WIth any Installment payments to .become due dUring either it) the term of any applicable Insurance poliCY. or (2) the remaining term of the Note. or (e) be treated as a balloon payment which Will be due and payable at the Note's maturity The ASSignment also Will secure payment of these amounts Such nghtshall be In addition to all other rights and remedies to which Lender may be entitled upon Default DEFAULT Each of the follOWing. at Lender's option. shall constitute an Event of Default under thiS ASSignment Payment Default Grantor falls to make any payment when due under the 'Indebtedness Other Defaults Grantor falls to comply With or to perform any other term, obhgatlon, covenant or conditIon comalned In thiS ASSignment or In any of the Related Documents or to comply wIth or to perform any term. obhgatlon. covenant or condition contamed III any other agreement between Lender and Grantor Default on Other Payments Failure of Grantor Within the time reqUired by thIS ASSignment to make any payment for taxes or Insurance, or any other payment necessary to prevent filing of or to ,effect discharge of any hen Default In Favor of Third Parties Grantor defaults under any loan, extension of credIt. secuflty agreement. purchase or sales agreement, or, any other agreement, In favor of any other creditor or peison that may materially affect any of Grantor's property or Grantor's ablhty to perform Grantor's obhgatlOns under thIS ASSignment or any of the Related Documents EnVironmental Default Failure of any party to comply With or perform when due any term. obligation, convenant or condition contained In any environmental agreement executed on connection With the Property False Statements Any warranty. representation or statement made or furnished to Lender by Grantor or on Grantor's behalf under thiS ASSignment or the Related Documents IS false or misleading on any matenal respect. eIther now or at the time made or furnished or becomes false or misleading at any time thereafter Defective Collaterahzatlon ThiS ASSignment or any of the Related Documents ceases to be In full force and effect Loan No. 00001 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS (Continued) Page 4 (including far/ure of any collateral document to create a valid and perfected securrty Interest or lien) at any time and for any reason Insolvency The dissolution or termination of Grantor's eXistence as a gOln9 business, the Insolvency of Grantor, the appointment of a receiver for any part of Grantor's property. any assignment for the beneht of creditors, any· type of creditor workout, or the commencement of any proceeding under any bankruptcy or Insolvency laws by or against Grantor . Creditor or Forfeiture Proceedmgs Commencement of foreclosure or forfeiture proceedings, whether by Judicial proceeding, self-help, reposseSSIOn or any other method, by any creditor of Grantor or by any governmental agency agamst the Rents or any property securing the Indebtedness ThiS Includes a garnishment ot any of Grantor's accounts, including depOSit accounts, With Lender However, thiS Event of Default shall not apply If there IS a good faith dispute by Grantor as to the validity or reasonableness of the claim whICh IS the baSIS of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and If Grantor gives Lender written notice of the creditor or forfeiture proceeding and depoSits With Lender monies or a surety bond for the creditor or forfeiture proceeding, In an amount determmed by Lender, . In Its sole discretiOn, as being an adequate reserve or bond for the dispute Property Damage or Loss The Property 15 lost, stolen, substantially damaged, sold, or borrowed agamst Events Affectmg Guarantor Any of the preceding events occurs With respect to any Guarantor of any of the Indebtedness or any Guarantor dies or becomes Incompetent, or revokes or disputes the validity of, or liability under, any Guaranty of the Indebtedness In the event of a death, Lender, at Its option, may, but shall not be requued to, permit the Guarantor's estate to assume unconditionally the obligations allSlng under the guaranty In a manner satisfactory to Lender, and, In dOing so, cure a'ny Event of Default Adverse Change A matenal adverse change occurs In Grantor's ftnanclal condition, or lender believes the prospect of payment or performance of the Indebtedness IS Impaired InseCUrity Lender In good faith behaves Itself Insecure Cure PrOVISIons If any default, other than a default In payment IS curable and If Grantor has not been given a notice of a breach of the same prOVISion of thiS ASSIgnment wlthm the preceding twelve (12) months, It may be· cured (and no event of default Will have occurred) If Grantor, after receIVing written notice from Lender demanding cure of such default 11) cures the default WIthin thirty (30) days, or (2) If the cure requires more than thirty (30) days, Immediately Initiates steps which lender deems In lender's sole discretion to be sulflclent to cure the default and thereafter conttnues and completes all reasonable and necessary steps suffiCient to produce comphance as soon as reasonably practical RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ON DEFAULT Upon the occurrence of any Event ot Default and at any tIme thereafter, Lender may exerCise anyone or more of the follOWing nghts and remed,es, In additIon to any other rtghts or remedIes prOVIded by law Accelerate Indebtedness Lender shall have the rtght at Its option without notIce to Grantor to declare the entire Indebtedness ImmedIately due and payable, Including any prepayment penalty which Grantor would be reqUIred to pay Collect Rents lender shall have the right, Without notice to Grantor, to take possessIOn of the Property and collect the Rents, Including amounts past due and unpaid, and apply the net proceeds, over and above Lender's costs, a9amst the Indebtedness In furtherance of thiS fight, Lender shall have all the rights prOVided for Ifl the Lender's Right to Receive and Collect Rents Section, above If the Rents are collected by Lender, then Grantor Irrevocably deSignates Lender as Grantor's attorneY-In-fact to endorse Instruments received 10 payment thereof In the name of Grantor and to negot,ate the same and collect the proceeds Payments by tenants or other users to Lender In response to Lender's demand shall satisfy the obhgattons for which the payments are made, whether or not any proper grounds for the demand eXIsted Lender may exercise ItS rights under thiS subparagraph either In person, by agent, or through a receiver AppOint Receiver Lender shall have the light to have a receiver appOinted to take possession of all or any part of the Property, with the power to protect and preserve the Property, to operate the Property preceding or pending foreclosure or sale, and to collect the Rents from the Property and apply the proceeds, over and above the cost of the receivership, against the Indebtedness The receiver may serve Without bond If permitted by law Lender's fight to the apPoIntment of a receiver shall eXist whether or not the apparent value of the Property exceeds the Indebtedness by a substantial amount Employment by lender shall not disqualify a person from serving as a receiver Other Remedies lender shall have all other fights and remedies prOVIded In thiS ASSignment or the Note or by law ElectIon of Remedies Election by Lender to pursue any remedy shall not exclude pursuit of any other remedy; and an election to make expenditures or to take action to perform an oblrgatlon of Grantor under thiS Asslgnment,after J700'0J76 ~OO~O ~O1700~ ~> ,-_., Loan No: 00001 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS (Continued) '-.. -~'~ Grantor's failure to perform, shall not affect Lender's rrght to declare a default and exercise Its remedies 20040102001940.005 Page 5 Attorneys' Fees, Expenses If Lender tnstltutes any SUit or actIOn to enforce any of the terms of this ASSignment, Lender shall be entitled to recover such sum as the court may adludge reasonable as attorneys' fees at trial and upon any appeal Whether or not any court action IS Involved, and to the extent not prohibited by law, all reasonable expenses Lender Incurs that In Lender's opinion are necessary at any time for the protection of Its Interest or the enforcement of ItS rights shall become a part of the Indebtedness payable on demand and shall bear Interest at the Note rate from the date of the expenditure until repaid Expenses covered by thiS paragraph Include, Without hmrtatlon, however subject to any limits under apphcable law, Lender's attorneys' fees and lender'S legal expenses, whether or not there 15 a laWSUit, including attorneys' fees and expenses for bankruptcy proceedings hncludlng efforts to modIfy or vacate any automatIc stay or injunction), appeals, and any anticIpated post-judgment collectIon serVIces, the cost of searching records, obtaining title repons (Including foreclosure repons), surveyors' reports, and appraisal fees, title Insurance, and fees for the Trustee, to the extent permitted by apphcable law Grantor also Will pay any court costs, In additIon to all other sums prOVided by law MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS The folJowrng miscellaneous provIsions are a part of thiS ASSignment Amendments ThiS ASSignment, together With any Related Documents, constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the panles as to the matters set fonh In thIS ASSignment No alteration of or amendment to thiS ASSignment shall be effectIve unless given In WlltlOg and Signed by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendment Caption Headings CaptIOn headIngs 10 thiS ASSignment are lor convenience purposes only and are not to be used to Interpret or define the prOVISIonS of thiS ASSignment Governing Law This ASSIgnment Will be governed by, construed and enforced 10 accordance with federal law and the laws of the State of Washmgton This ASSignment has been accepted by Lender III the State of Washmgton ChOICe of Venue If there IS a laWSUit, Grantor agrees upon lender's request to submit to the Junsdlctlon of the courts of KING County, State of Washington Merger There shall be no merger of the Interest or estate creilted by thIS assignment With any other Interest or estate In the Propeny at any time held by or for the benefit of Lender In any capacity, WIthout the written consent of Lender Interpretation (') In all cases where there IS more than one Borrower or Grantor, then all words used In thiS ASSIgnment In the Singular shall be deemed to hilve been used In the plural where the context and constructIon so require (2) If more than one person signs thiS Assl9nment as "Grantor," the obligations of each Grantor are JOint and several ThiS means that If lender bnngs a laWSUit, Lender may sue anyone or more of .he Grantors If Borrower and Grantor are not the same person, lender need not sue Borrower hrst, and that Borrower need not be Jomed In any laWSUit (31 The names gIVen to paragraphs or sectIons In thiS ASSIgnment are for convenIence purposes only They are not to be used to Interpret or deftne the pro"ISlons of thiS ASSignment No Waiver by Lender lender shall not be deemed to' have waIved any rights under thiS As·slgnment unless such waiver IS given In writing and Signed by Lender No delay or omission on the pan of Lender In exercIsing any fight shall operate as a waiver of such nght or any other nght A waiver by lender of a prOVISion of thiS ASSignment shall not preJudice or constitute a waIVer of lender'S fight otherwise to demand Strict compliance With that prOVISion or any other provIsion of thiS ASSignment No pilar waiver by lender, nor any course of dealing between lender and Grantor, shall constitute a waiver of any of Lender's rights or of any of Grantor's obhgatlons as to any future transactions Whenever 'the consent of lender IS reqUIred under thiS Asscgnment, the granting of such consent by lender In any Instance shall not constItute continUing consent to subsequent Instances where such consent IS requlled and 10 all cases such consent may be granted or WIthheld In the sale' discretion of Lender Notices SubJect to applicable law, and except for notice reqUired or allowed by law to be given In another manner, any notice reqUIred to be given under thiS ASSignment shall be gIven In writing, and shall be effective when actually delivered, when actually received by telefacslmlle (unless otherWise required by law), when depOSited WIth a nationally recognized overnight couner, or, If mailed, when depOSited In the United States mall, as first class, certified or regIstered mall postage prepaid, directed to the addresses shown near the beginning of thiS ASSignment Any party may change rts address for notIces under thiS ASSIgnment by giVing formal written notice to the other parties, speCIfYing that the purpose of the notIce IS to change the pany's address For notice purposes, Grantor agrees to keep Lender Informed at all tImes of Grantor's current address Subject to applicable law, and except for notice reqUIred or allowed by law to be gIven In another manner, If there IS more than one Grantor, any notice given by lender to any Grantor IS deemed to be notice Qlven to all Grantors Powers of Attorney The various agencies' and powers of attorney conveyed on Lender under thiS ASSignment are granted for purposes of security and may not be revoked by Grantor until such time as the same are renounced by Lender Severablhty If a court of competent JUriSdiction finds any proVISIon of thIS ASSignment to be Illegal, invalid, or Loan No: 00001 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS (Continued) Page 6 unenforceable as to any circumstance. that finding shall not make the offending provIsion Illegal. invalid. or unenforceable as to any other circumstance If feasible. the offending provIsion shall be considered modified so that It becomes legal. valid and enforceable If the offerxilng prOvISion cannot be so modified. It shall be conSidered deleted from this Assignment-Unless otherwISe required by law. the Illegality. Invalidity, or unenforceability of any provISion of this Ass19nment shall not affect the legality. validity or enforceability of any other provISion of this Assignment Successors and Assigns Sublect to any limitations stated In this Assignment on transfer of Grantor's Interest. this Assignment shall be binding upon and Inure" to the benefit of the parties. their successors and assigns If ownership of the Property becomes vested In a person other than Grantor. lender. Without notice to Grantor, may deal With Grantor's successors With reference to this Assignment and the Indebtedness by way of forbearance or extension Without releasmg Grantor from the obligations of this Assignment or Ilablhty under the Indebtedness Tune IS of the Essence Time IS of the essence In the performance of this Assignment Waive Jury All parties to thIS Assignment hereby waIVe the right to any JUry trial In any action. proceeding, or counterclaim brought by any party against -any other party WAIVER OF HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION Grantor hereby releases and waives all fights and benefits of the homestead exemption laws of the State of Washington as to all Indebtedness secured by thiS ASSignment WAIVER OF RIGHT OF REDEMPTION NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OF THE PROVISIONS TO THE CONTRARY CONTAINED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT. GRANTOR HEREBY WAIVES ANY AND All RIGHTS OF REDEMPTION FROM SALE UNDER ANY ORDER OR JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE ON GRANTOR'S BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF EACH AND EVERY PERSON. EXCEPT JUDGMENT CREDITORS OF GRANTOR. ACQUIRING ANY INTEREST IN OR TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT DEFINITIONS The follOWing caPitalIZed words and terms shall have the follOWIng meanings when used In thiS ASSignment Unless speCifically stated to the contrary. all references to dollar amounts shall mean amounts In lawful money of the United States of Amenca Words and terms used In the Singular shall Include the plural. and the plural shall Include the Singular. as the context may require Words and terms not otherWise defined In thiS ASSIgnment shall have the meanings attnbuted to such-terms In -the Uniform CommerCial Code AsslgnmlJnt The word "AssIgnment" means thiS ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS. as thIS ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS may be amended or modIfied from time to tIme. together With all exhIbIts and schedules attached to thiS ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS from time to time Borrower The word "Borrower" means MCLENDON HARDWARE. INC Default The word "Default" means the Default set forth In thiS ASSignment In the section titled "Default" Event of Default The words "Event of Default" mean any of the events of default set forth In thiS ASSignment In the default section of thiS ASSignment Grantor The word "Grantor" means MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC Guarantor -The word ~Guarantor" means any guarantor. surety, or accommodation party of any or all of the Indebtedness GUliranty The word "Guaranty" means the guaranty from Guarantor to lender, inclUding Without hmltatlon a guaranty of all or part of the Note Indebtedness The word -"Indebtedness" means all prinCipal. Interest. and other amounts. costs and expenses payable under the Note or Related Documents, together with all renewals of. extensions of. modifications of. consolidations of and Substitutions for the Note or Related -Documents and any amounts expended or advanced by lender to discharge Grantor'S obhgatrons or expenses Incurred by lender to enforce Grantor's obligations under thiS ASSignment, together with Interest on such amounts as prOVIded In thiS ASSignment SpeCifically. Without limitation. Indebtedness -Includes the future advances set forth In the Future Advances prOVISion, together With all Interest thereon lind all amounts that may be indirectly secured by the Cross-Collaterahzatron provIsion of this ASSignment - lender The word "lender" means COLUMBIA STATE BANK, ItS successors and assigns Note The word "Note" means the promissory note dated December 29. 2003, in the Original principal amount of $3.000.000.00 from Grantor to lender. together With all renewals of. extensions of. modIfications of. -refinanCings of .. consohdatloflS of, and substitutions for the promissory note or agreement Property The word 'Property" means all of Grantor's right, title and Interest In and to all the Property as desctlbed In the" ASSignment" section of thiS ASSIgnment ---Related Documents The words "Related Documents" mean all promissory notes. credIt agreements. loan agreements. environmental agreements, guaranties. security agreements. mortgages. deeds of trust, security 900'OtG ~OO~O ~OPOO~ :'--....r-: loan No 00001 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS (Continued) 20040102001940,007 Page 7 deeds, collateral mortgages, and all other Instruments, agreements and documents, whether now or hereafter eXlstmg, executed In connection with the Indebtedness Rents The word "Rents· means all of Grantor's present and future rrghts, title and mterest In, to and under any and all present and tuture leases, mcludlng. without Ilmltahon. all rents, revenue, Income, Issues, royalties. bonuses, accounts receIvable. cash or security deposits, advance rentals, profits and proceeds from the Property, and other payments and benefIts derived or to be derived from such leases of every kind and nature, whether due now or later, IncludIng without IIrrntatlon Grantor's reght to enforce such leases and to receive and collect payment and proceeds thereunder THE UNDERSIGNED ACKNOWLEDGES HAVING READ ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ASSIGNMENT. AND NOT PERSONALLY BUT AS AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER, HAS CAUSED THIS ASSIGNMENT TO BE SIGNED AND EXECUTED ON BeiALF OF GRANTOR ON DECEMBER 29. 2003 GRANTOR MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC On thiS ~ \ ~ day of b-t-c .. ""besf , 20~. before me. the underSigned Notary Public. personally appeared GAIL R MCLENDON, PresIdent of MCLENDON HARDWARE. INC, and personally known to me or proved to me on the baSIS of satIsfactory eVIdence to be an authorized agent of the corporation that executed the ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS and acknowledged the ASSIgnment to be the free and voluntary act and deed of ·the corporation, by authority of ItS Bylaws or by resolution of ItS board of .dtrectors. for the uses and purposes therein mentIoned, and on oath stated that he or she ,5 authorized to execute th,s ASSignment and 10 fact executed the ASSignment on alf of th rp atlon By, ____ ~~~~~~~~ Notary PublIc I Residing at g:,..,~ c!. tJ ... t 1 My commission expires <:) 3/ldfo't Loan No: 00001 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS (Continued) --........ -... ~'\. ~.'" \, --r , PC,," . . ~. ~. ,"', , ., ) -'-7~ ", I· '" ,~ ~ , , ~ .,' ,f) CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT , ~) , 'I, I STATE OF 1.0t(Gh 1 jV~ +~ / '. ~ ~ .-;: ) SS '~,:~, ,;:)' , ,~ ... _' h ,..: ..... r-.'} __ ) COUNTY OF . \.( • IJ ~ ) "'\.'" .... ,.' .,,\~ ... \ ~. -- \."" ,,'\0 .. , .... --~- Page 8 On thIs '"'!> \~ day of b<ec-e a..Jo.er ,20 03 . before me, the undersIgned Notary Pubhc. personally appeared MICHAR 0 MCLENDON. Secretary of MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC, and personally known to me or proved to me on the basIs of satISfactory eVIdence to be an authonzed agent of the corporatIon that executed the ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS and acknowledged the AssIgnment to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the corporation, by authorrty of ItS Bylaws or by resolution of ItS board of dl(ectors, for the uses and purposes therein mentIoned, and on oath stated that he or she IS authOrized to execute thIs AssIgnment and In fact executed the Asslg9Q1ent on bljh'llf of t!!e corporatIon By CLJtaI,a.v -, / -L Notary Public In ':-~~ ~ ,~;~~:, :Jo( Ji\, A-\l . ~.r'" J t~~';':'~ tLJ 'r"'I::0'~'J~' ~ f\.') ~~ ReSIding at t: IU ~ e,I)A/~ My commIssIon expires 63/1" fo tf LA3fA PRO L-ndc-IiI v., '22 %0 ~ c ...... H.1Md I'''.I'I''*'' $~b06. 1M' I"' lOCI, All ~h" AoMo",.cf WI. C 'CFr\.LI!\.\GU R: TR 2010..2 PR 41 SOO'OtE> ~OOZO a.OVOOZ '......:...: ... '~.:......" ;J .:,;' EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A A portIon of the Henry H. Tobm DonatIOn ClaIm No. 37 m SectIOn 18, TownshJP 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M , III Kmg County, Washmgton descnbed as follows. 20040102001940.009 Commencmg at the Northwest corner of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to plat recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, records ofK.mg County, WhICh corner bears . South 89°07' East 30 feet and North 0046'East 530 feet from the Monument at the intersectIon of Second Avenue and Burnett Street; thence North 0°46' East 275. feet to the pomt ofbegmmng, thence North 0°46' East 7652 feet, thence South 89°07' East 115 feet; thence South 0°46' West 76 52 feet; thence North 89° 07' West 115 feet to the point ofbegmnmg PARCELB A portIOn of the Henry H Tobm Donahon ClaIm No 37 m Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W M, m Kmg County, Washmgton descnbed as follows. Begmnmg on the east margm of Burnett Street III the CIty of Renton North 00° 40' East 730 feet from the centerlIne of Second Avenue, thence south 89° 01' East 115 feet; thence North 00°46' East 75 feet; thence South 89°07' West 115 feet, thence South 0° 46' West 75 feet to the pomt ofbegmmng. PARCELC A portion of the Henry H. Tobm DonatIon ClaIm No 37 in Section 18, Townsrup 23 North, Range 5 East, w M~, m King County, Washington deScnbed as follows: . Beginning at a point on the East lme of Burnett Street 150 feet north of the Northwest comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat recorded in Volume 1 ofPtats, Page 135, m Kmg County, Washmgton; runnmg thence East parallel with the North hne of saId Block 24 a dIstance of 115 feet, thence North parallel WIth the East hne Burnett Street 50 feet, thence West parallel WIth the North hne of said Block 24 a dIstance of 115 feet to the East hne ofBumett Street; thence Southon the East hne ofBumett Street 50 feet to the pomt ofbegmnmg Page 10f3 , PARCELD /~ .. , A portion of the Henry H. Tobm Donahon Clatm No 37 In Sechon 18, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., In Kmg County, WashIngton descnbed as follows: 20040102001940.010 Commencmg at the Northwest comer of Block 24, the Town of Renton Plat, whIch comer bears South 89°07' East, a dIstance 0[30 feet and North 0°46' East, a dIstance of 530 feet from the monument at the mtersectIon of Second Avenue and Burnett Street; thence North 0° 46' East a dIstance of 150 feet; thence South 89° 07' East a dIstance of 115 feet; thence South 0°46' West a distance of 150 feet, thence North 89°07' West a distance of 1 15 feet to the pomt ofbegmmng Also, Lots 1,2,3 and 4, Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat recorded m Volume 1 of plats, page 135, m KIng County, WashIngton, except the East 5 feet thereof conveyed to the CIty of Renton for alley purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 2117471 and 2117484 Also, Lots 16 and 17, Block 24 Town of Renton, accordmg to plat recorded m Volume I of Plats, page 135, m Kmg County, Washmgton, together With the Easterly portIOn of vacated alJey adjOInIng on the West, as vacated by the City of Renton under Ordmance No 3272 PARCELE A portIOn of the Henry H Tobm DonatIon Claim No 37 In Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W M, m Kmg County, Washington descnbed as follows: Begmnmg at a pomt on the Westerly lme ofWIlhams Street 100 feet Northerly from the Northeast comer of Block 24 of Town of Renton, accordmg the plat recorded in Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, thence North 0°46' East along the Westerly hne ofWllhams Street, 50 feet, thence North 89°07' West 115 feet; thence South 0°46' West 50 feet, thence South 89° 07' East 115 feet to the pomt ofbegmnmg Page 2 of3 , .,', .. PARCELF A portIon of the Henry H. Tobm DonatIon ClaIm No 37 m Section 18, Townshtp 23 North, Range 5 East, W M, m Kmg County, Washmgton described as follows: 20040102001940.011 Begmnmg at the Northeast comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, thence Northerly on the Easterly hne of saId Block 24, produced, 250 feet to the true pomt ofbegmnmg of the tract herein descnbed, thence contmumg Northerly on said Easterly hne of SaId Block 24, produced, 101.52 feet; thence Westerly paranel to the Northerly lIne of said Block 24, 1 15 feet; thence Southerly para]]el to SaId Easterly lme of Block 24 produced northerly 101 52 feet; thence Easterly, parallel to saId Northerly line of Said Block 24, 115 feet to the true pomt of begInning, Except the North 50 feet thereof PARCELG That portion of the Northwest quarter of SectIon 17, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W M, In Kmg County, descnbed as follows Begmrung at the Northeast comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat thereof recorded III Volume I of Plats, Page 135, m Kmg County, Washmgton: Thence North along the Northerly production of the East lme of said Block, a distance of 203 feet to the True Pomt of Begmmng; thence contmumg North along saId East hne produced, a dIstance of 47 feet, thence West parallel to the North hne of Block 24, a dIstance of 115 feet, thence South 47 feet, thence East parallel to the North lme of Block 24, a dIstance of 115 feet to the True Pomt of Begmnmg. PARCELH Lot 18, Block 24, Town of Renton accordmg the to plat thereofrecorded in Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, mKmg County, Washmgton, Except the West 5 feet thereof conveyed to the CIty of Renton for alley purposes by deed recorded under Recordmg no 2117478. Page 3 of3 , WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO COLUMBIA STATE BANK lOAN OPERATIONS MS-6120 1102 BROADWAY PLAZA TACOMA, WA 98402 --1111111111111111 20040102001941 . TRANSNATION Tl uce 22 88 PAGE881.0F 804 81/02/2884 14:27 KING COUNTV, UA . 20040102001941.001 WASHINGTON UCC-2 IvUUN I Y AUDITOR FIXTU-R....--.~rTT7'.----:-rl-;=-:l-- 1 Gramorts! 0'" name tlf", and ma.llng address(esl} 2 Granlee!sIlAsslgnoo/Benefocary MClENDON HARDWARE, INC 91-0743973 710 S SECOND ST RENTON, WA 98055 TIN COLUMBIA STATE BANK 504 W MEEKER KENT, WA 98032· -IOI377E' loS 750f{ THIS FIXTURE FILING SHALL COVER COLLATERAL THAT IS AFFIXED TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY Reference Number AddItional on page Short legal DeSCriptIOn A POR OF THE HENRY H TOBIN DONA elM # 37 IN SEC 37, T 23 N, R 5 E. W M IN KING COUNTY AddItional on page __ Assessor's Tax . Parcel 10# 723150203O,0007200154,72315020B5,7231502120,oo07200139,OO07200130.0007200109.0007200156,0007020 104 Legal DeSCriptIon SEE AITACHED EXHIBIT "A" FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~~:J..-'+. ffifiD FOR RECORD AT nW REQUEST C. 'fRANSNATJON TIll£: INSLJR~CE GO. THIS FIXTURE FILING COVERS THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY All Fixtures, whether any of the foregOing IS owned now or acquired later, all accessions. additions, replacements. and Substitutions relating to any of the foregolOg, all record$ of any kind relating to any of the foregomg. all proceeds relating to any of the foregOing hncludlng msurance, general intangibles and accounts proceeds). including but not hmlted to all Personal Property (tangible or Intangible) now owned or hereafter acqUired by Borrower In connection wllh the ownership, development. maintenance. operation of all leases. rents. revenues and cash collateral of the property located at 104 & 82 BURNETT AVE S, 710 S 2ND ST. 111.79,81,91 WILLlAMS·AVE S, 7075 S TOBIN ST. RENTON WA 98055_ 4 0 The deb(OI l$ the r«Ofd owner 5 Tho. atatllfTlelll IS "9"""."" thO SeC<Jrod partvllGSlon.teed 01 lhe Debtor(.} to perleet a 6 Complet. fully If box Id) os checked seeuroty ,nteresl ,n collateral (Please check 8ppTOpn"te box) complele as appllC8b!e for (ai, !bl and (e) fa) 0 Ib) 0 IC) 0 !d) 0 already subJect to secvrrty Interest In another ,uhsdlC1lM when It was brought II1tO thiS St316. or when the debtOf' s locatIOn was changed to ttvs state, or whiCh IS proceeds of the Ollglnal collateras deSCribed above In whiCh a securoty Interest was perfecled, Or 89 to which (he recording has I,psed* 01 acqUlfed afler a change of name, !dOnhly. Of corporate structure of Ihe deblorls) Oeted December 29, 2003 .20 __ _ M:;l.endon Hardware, Inc. TYPE NAME(S} Of OEB"[OR(Sllor a,.ognorls)) Gail R. ~Lendon, President Michael D. M::lendon, Secretary Olf,ce Where recorded Former name of debtor(s} SIGNATUREISI OF DEBTOR(S) Cor assognor!.11 SIGNATURE(S) OF SECURED PAR1Y(lfS) lor .ss'gnee!sll COpy 1 COUNTY AUDITOR FORM APPROVEO fOR USE IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ·, .. EXHIDIT "A" LEGAL DESC,RIPTION PARCEL A A portIon of the Henry H Tobm Donation Claim No. 37m Sectlon 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W M., 10 K10g County, Wash1Ogton descnbed as fol)ows· 20040102001941.002 Commenc1Og at the Northwest comer of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordIng to plat recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, records ofK1Og County. whIch comer bears South 89°07' East 30 feet and North 0046'East 530 feet from the Monument at the mtersectIon of Second Avenue and Burnett Street; thence North 0°46' East 275 feet to the POInt ofbeg1Omng; thence North 0°46' East 76.52 feet; thence South 89°07' East 115 feet; thence South 0°46' West 76 52 feet, thence North 89° 07' West 115 feet to the POInt ofbegInmng PARCELB A portion of the Henry H. TobIn DonatlOn ClaIm No. 37 In SectIon 18, TownshIp 23 North. Range 5 East, W M, In KIng County, WashIngton descnbed as follows Beguuung on the east marg10 of Burnett Street m the CIty of Renton North 00° 40' East 730 feet from the centerlIne of Second Avenue. thence south 89° 07' East 115 feet, thence North 00°46' East 75 feet; thence South 89°07' West 115 feet, thence South 0° . 46' West 75 feet to the pomt ofbegInmng PARCELC . A portlOn of the Henry H TobIn Donation Claim No. 37 In Sectlon 18, Townslup 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Wash1Ogton descnbed as follows Begmning at a pomt on the East lme of Burnett Street 150 feet north of the Northwest comer of Block 24. Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In Kmg County, WashIngton; runn10g thence East parallel WIth the North Ime of saId Block 24 a distance of 115 feet, thence North parallel WIth the East hne Burnett Street 50 feet, thence West parallel WIth the North hne of srud Block 24 a dIstance of 115 feet to the East hne of Burnett Street, thence South on the East hne of Burnett Street 50 feet to the pomt ofbegmnmg Page 1 of3 PARCELD A portion of the Herny H. Tobm DonatIon ClaIm No. 37 m SectlOn 18, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., m Kmg County, Washtngton descnbed as follows' 20040102001941.003 Commencmg at the Northwest corner of Block 24, the Town of Renton Plat, whIch corner bears South 89°0T East, a dIstance of 30 feet and North 0°46' East, a dIstance of 530 feet from the monument at the mtersectIon of Second Avenue and Burnett Street, thence North 0° 46' East a dIstance of 150 feet, thence South 89° 07' East a dIstance of liS feet; thence South 0°46' West a dIstance of 150 feet; thence North 89°0T West a distance of 115 feet to the pomt ofbegmrung Also, Lots 1,2,3 and 4, Block 24, Town of Renton, according to the plat recorded In Volume 1 ofpiats, page 135, In Kmg County, WashIngton, except the East 5 feet thereof conveyed to the CIty of Renton for alley purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's FIle No. 2117471 and 2117484 Also, Lots 16 and 17, Block 24 Town of Renton, accordmg to plat recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, page 135, In Kmg County, Washmgton, together wIth the Easterly portIOn of vacated alley adJommg on the West, as vacated by the CIty of Renton under Ordmance No 3272 PARCELE .A portIon ofthe Henry H Tobm DonatIon ClaIm No. 37 m SectIon 18, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M, m Kmg County, Washtngton descnbed as fonows Begmnmg at a point on the Westerly Ime ofWIlhams Street 100 feet Northerly from the Northeast comer of Block 24 of Town of Renton, accordmg the plat recorded In Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, thence North 0°46' East along the Westerly lme ofWllhams Street. 50 feet; thence North 89°07' West 115 feet; thence South 0°46' West 50 feet; thence South 89° 07' East 115 feet to the pomt ofbegmnmg Page 2 of3 . --. .... " {;7 .~~.;:~. PARCELF A portIon of the Henry H Tobm DonatlOn ClaIm No. 37 In SectIOn 18, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., In KmgCounty, Washmgton descnbed as follows' 20040102001941.004 Beginrung at the Northeast corner of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, thence Northerly on the Easterly hne of said Block 24, produced, 250 feet to the true pomt ofbegmnmg of the tract herem descnbed, thence contmumg Northerly on saId Easterly hne of srud Block 24, produced, 10 J .52 feet; thence Westerly parallel to the Northerly lme ofsatd Block 24, 115 feet; thence Southerly parallel to saId Easterly lIne of Block 24 produced northerly 101 52 feet, thence Easter1y, parallel to saId Northerly lme of saId Block 24, 115 feet to the true pomt ofbegllullng, Except the North 50 feet thereof. PARCELG That portIOn of the Northwest quarter of SectIOn 17, TownshIp 23 North, Range 5 East, W M , m K10g County, descnbed as follows Begmnmg at the Northeast corner of Block 24, Town of Renton, accordmg to the plat thereof recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, m Kmg County, Washmgton Thence North along the Northerly productIon of the East bne of SaId Block, a distance of. 203 feet to the True Point of Begmnmg, thence contmumg North along said East lme produced, a dIstance of 47 feet, thence West parallel to the North line of Block 24, a dIstance of 115 feet; thence South 47 feet, thence East parallel to the North line of Block 24, a dIstance of 115 feet to the True Pomt ofBeginnmg PARCELH Lot 18, Block 24, Town of Renton according the to plat thereof recorded m Volume 1 of Plats, Page 135, In Kmg COUIIty, Washmgton, Except the West 5 feet thereof conveyed to the CIty of Renton for alley purposes by deed recorded under Recordmg no. 2117478 Page 3 of3 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE CHICAGO TITLE ·INSURANCE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and chargc;s therefore; all SUbjeCt to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the ·issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. In Witness Whereof, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory. Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 3300 BANK OF AMERICA TOWER 7015THAVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98104 (205) 628-5666 Form C 9800 (Reprinted 09/(0) CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: President ATIEST CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquireor create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Strpulations, and Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured where are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. EXCLUSIONS NOTE: THE FORM OF POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY REFERENCE TO FORMS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OR BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS COMMITMENT. The Exclusions from Coverage referred to in Paragraph 3 of the Conditions and Stipulations are as follows: ALTA OWNER'S POLICY FORM 10-17-92 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; of (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any yiolation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regula- tions, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date ~~~ . (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or J. .' (e) resulting in loss or damage w would not have been sustained if the insL _ ,claimant had paid value for the estat~ or interest insured by thiS policy. CHIC. '0 TITLE INSURANCE COf\'· ..... ANY 701 FlFfH A VENUE, #3400, SEA TfLE, WA 98104 A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Title Unit: Phone: U-06 (206)628-5610 (206)628-9717 SECOND COMMITMENT Fax: Officer: SA VIDISjWAGNER/CAMPBELL/MINOR Commitment Effective Date: MA Y 27,2004 1 . Policy or Policies to be issued: -_ ALTA Owner's Policy 1992 EXTENDED COMMERCIAL SHORT TBRM/PRIOR POLICY/LPA-RATB Proposed Insured: Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: at 8:00A.M. Amount: $0.00 Premium: -Tax: FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued:- ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Amount: Premium: $0.00 Tax: Amount: $0.00 Premium: Tax: 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3 . Title to the estate or mterest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AS TO PARCEL A; AND TENNESSEE GROUP L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO PARCELS B, C, D AND E 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT WL TACOMA/RDA/0999 PARCEL.A: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THAT PORTION OF HENRY TOBIN DONATION CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON PLAT, WHICH CORNER BEARS SOUTH 89°07' EAST A DISTANCE OF 30 FEET AND NORTH 0°46' EAST A DISTANCE OF 530 FEET FROM THE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SECOND AVENUE AND BURNETT STREET; THENCE NORTH 0°46' EAST A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07' EAST A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°46' WEST A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°07' WEST A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO, LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, INCLUSIVE, AND LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 5 FEET OF SAID LOTS 1 THROUGH 3, CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR ALLEY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 2117471 AND 2117484; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 10 FEET OF THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF SAID LOT 3, CONVEYED FOR ALLEY BY RECORDING NUMBER 7811200482; TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE ALLEY VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 3272, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7812140796 ADJOINING OR ABUTTING THEREON, WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL B: LOT 18, BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE· PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 5 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR ALLEY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2117478. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF THE HENRY TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF BURNETT STREET 150 FEET NORTH OF THE CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 I ' i CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 24 A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF BURNETT STREET 50 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 24 A DISTANCE OF 115 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF BURNETT STREET; THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF BURNETT STREET 50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF HENRY TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE EAST MARGIN OF BURNETT STREET IN THE CITY OF RENTON NORTH 0°46' EAST 730 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89°07' EAST 115 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°46' EAST 75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07' WEST 115 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°46' WEST 75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL E: THAT PORTION OF HENRY TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37, SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 24, TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WHICH CORNER BEARS SOUTH 89°07' EAST 30 FEET AND NORTH 0°46' EAST 530 FEET FROM THE MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SECOND AVENUE AND BURNETT STREET; THENCE NORTH 0°46' EAST 275 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 0°46' EAST 76.52· FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°07' EAST 115 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°46' WEST 76.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°07' WEST 115 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLTACMA6/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shoWn as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. G. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes . . H. Water rights, claims, or title to water. I. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. . SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW WLTACOMB/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 001124695 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: AS AFFECTS: PARCEL B ROBERT L. ANDERSON TCI CABLEVISION OF WASHINGTON, INC. JANUARY 4, 1995 9501040627 THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, OWN, UPGRADE, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO PROVIDE CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE B 2. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1. 78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT, MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. c 3. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY I, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTI ES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL A 2004 723150-2030-05 2100 $ 715,400.00 $ 42,900.00 BILLED: $ 8,727.53 PAID: $ 4,363.77 UNPAID: $ 4,363.76, CL TACMBI/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AL.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS D 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B 2004 723150-2120-06 2100 $ 80,500.00 $ 364,700.00 BILLED: $ 5,126.59 PAID: $ 2,563.30 UNPAID: $ 2,563.29 B 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL C 2004 000720-0104-04 ·2100 $ 80,500.00 $ 71,500.00 BILLED: $ 1,754.60 PAID: $ 877.30 UNPAID: $ 877.30 F 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : CLTACMB2jRDAj0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: . SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 2004 000720-0154-03 2100 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 120,700.00 $ 1,000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL D BILLED: $ 1,406.13 PAID: $ 703.07 UNPAID: $ 703.06 H 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY IS, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY I, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTI ES) : YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL E 2004 000720-0156-01 2100 $ 123,200.00 $ 1,000.00 BILLED: $ 1,434.88 PAID: $ 717.44 UNPAID: $ 717.44 8. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: TENNESSEE GROUP,. L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ROBERT L. ANDERSON AND LUANNE R. ANDERSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE $ 360,000.00 APRIL 16, 1998 APRIL 20, 1998 9804201798 CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT LOAN NUMBER: SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS N/A THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. L AFFECTS: PARCEL B • 9. MEMORANDUM OF LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LEASE DISCLOSED THEREIN: LESSOR: LESSEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: N AFFECTS: PARCEL B TENNESSEE GROUP LLC AMERICAN METER & APPLIANCE, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION FEBRUARY 2, 2001 20010202000383 BA 10. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. P 11. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: LOAN NUMBER: MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COLUMBIA STATE BANK $ 3,000,000.00 DECEMBER 29, 2003 JANUARY 2,2004 20040102001939 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR. ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS Q AFFECTS: INCLUDES OTHER PROPERTY R 12. ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS GIVEN FOR SECURITY AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ASSIGNOR: ASSIGNEE: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: s AFFECTS: INCLUDES OTHER PROPERTY MCLENDSON HARDWARE, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION COLUMBIA STATE BANK DECEMBER 29, 2003 JANUARY 2, 2004. 20040102001940 T 13. FINANCING STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: SECURED PARTY: DEBTOR: COVERS: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AG AFFECTS: INCLUDES OTHER PROPERTY COLUMBIA STATE BANK MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC. PERSONAL PROPERTY AND FIXTURES LOCATED ON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED JANUARY 2, 2004 20040102001941 u 14. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC., IN AND TO PARCELS B, C, D AND E, PRESUMED FROM THE EXECUTION OF INSTRUMENTS SET.· FORTH AT PARAGRAPHS 11, 12 AND 13. v 15. THE PROPOSED CONVEYANCE MUST BE AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DIRECTORS OF THE FOLLOWING NAMED CORPORATION AND A COPY SUBMITTED: MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC. 16. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR TENNESEE GROUP L.L.C. M AFFECTS: PARCELS B, C, D AND E CLTACM B2/RDA/r:B99 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB· (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS x NOTE: A COpy OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. r 17. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY TENNESSEE GROUP L.L.C., MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. z AFFECTS: PARCELS B, C, D AND E BB 18. THIS PARAGRAPH HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. AC 19. PRIOR TO ISSUING AN EXTENDED FORM OWNER'S POLICY THIS COMPANY REQUIRES THAT THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION PROVIDE AN ALTA/ACSM CERTIFIED, AS-BUILT SURVEY. AI 20. RIGHTS AND/OR OBLIGATIONS THAT MAY ARISE BY REASON OF THE CONTINUED' USE AND OPERATION OF THE EXISTING MCLENDON'S HARDWARE STORE BUILDING LOCATED UPON PARCEL A HEREIN AND THE PROPERTY ADJOINING TO THE SOUTH, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UTILITIES, BUILDING SUPPORT AND ENCROACHMENT(S), IF ANY, ACROSS THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL A BY EXISTING BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS. AD NOTE 1: EFFECTIVE JANUARY I, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER OR IMPOSITION OF A $50.00 SURCHARGE. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET REQUIREMENTS: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. I" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S). RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN) . **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE LEGIBLE AND CAPABLE OF BEING IMAGED. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTIONS OF THE TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 37 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18-23-5; AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1-4; AND LOTS 16-18, BLOCK 24, VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 135. END OF SCHEDULE B CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 • f CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULEB (Continued) Order No.: 1124695 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COpy OF THIS COMMITMENT: CHICAGO TITLE ESCROW -SUE STEVENS 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 1800 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 SUE STEVENS 1/0 LEIBSOHN & COMPANY 40 LAKE BELLEVUE DR., SUITE 270 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 CHAD WALDBAUM 1/1 (425)455-1777 FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC 7426 SE 27TH STREET, SUITE 200 MERCER ISLAND, WASHINGTON 98040 MCLENDON HARDWARE, INC. 710 SOUTH 2ND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 1/1 1/1 CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 '. '-. CHICAGO TITLL iNSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEA TILE, WA 98104 1/, '$! PHONE: (206)628-5610 FAX: (206)628-9717 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. l, ~ ~ ~O 115 ~ . ''''''6~fN . ,Z-!~·lll . I%.'I''''~ Q .... 101 C\l () ,{,It""' IS«,&II.!J' II) "5 ,p(,~-: , , ®" o' 'p.e· II (~~ IV '" , ,1-';;' III ~ I~-~ . "c. ,. ". c;.. II) ~~ ~®o {@~ . ,." I .... 0 .. f.o~'" fit. " -r .• 4. _ ~i~+ I.S 9bt~ €j) ~~~o .. ,4-A" • .. D· D' " . .., \ ~~,:J. ~ 0_. 1'@'" ~ fOri '" W ~1~ -.... -f'f >, f\I {O 1\1 ... --0 « ~ ,:lPG' )~\ ~ I;) o· ~.'" 0 o If--<([ijJ'" • ~ , ~ W ~. '.71 .. > 5 I '5 ® 0 <t ~ ~ \1~t , ' 2 ,.)(' :.4 \1Ij~<'IIG'~ \t-" ~ IS~ ,5, \qc.~ 11-1;,. ... 6fI'" fl,orlS 't ~<I ~ • ~~ 0 5 : 6 '0[ ~ :0 Ie (/) ~~ 0 ~ \ r,'(, t to ~ , tf) ·7 (\J .J \ ,.... .-J ~ \ \ <, • EXCLUSIONS (Cont'd.) . 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ALTA LOAN POLICY FORM (10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separa- tion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encum- brance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) . created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is con- tracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out 6f the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE .,.0,.,00 "/t~~ o~ ___ ?~ • • ~ ~ toflll>t ~~ i ... 1~CE 0 0+ cmCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 171 North Clark Street Chicago, DIinois 60601-3294 r , Printed: 06-23-2004 Payment Made: 'CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA04-070 06/23/2004 09:30 AM Receipt Number: R0403362 Total Payment: 2,521.83 Payee: MERRILL GARDENS LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #271050 2,521.83 Account Balances Amount 500.00 2,000.00 21. 83 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5011 5012 5013 5014 5015 5016 5017 5018 5019 5020 5021 5022 5023 5024 5036 5909 5941 59;i4 5955 5998 303.000.00.345.85 000.345.81.00.0002 000.345.81.00.0003 000.345.81.00.0004 000.345.81.00.0006 000.345.81.00.0007 000.345.81.00.0008 000.345.81.00.0009 000.345.81.00.0010 000.345.81.00.0011 000.345.81.00.0012 000.345.81.00.0013 000.345.81.00.0014 000.345.81.00.0015 000.345.81.00.0016 000.345.81.00.0017 000.345.81.00.0018 000.345.81.00.0019 o 000.345.81.00.0024 000.345.81.00.0005 000.341.60.00.0024 000.341.50.00.0000 604.237.00.00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.1 000.231.70.00.0000 Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Review Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) Special Deposits Postage Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Christopher Brown @ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~ . . ~eatt1e. WA 98118-5981 (206) 7'22-1910 fax (206) 7'22-1909 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre a TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for a 163 -Unit Assisted Living Facility in the City of Renton King County June 14,2004 Traffic Engineers & Transportation Planners Mr. Steve Friedman Friedman Development, LLC P. O. Box 1018 Mercer Island, W A 98040-1018 Mr. Curtis Beattie Curtis Beattie & Associates 3131 Elliott Avenue, Suite 270 Seattle, WA 98121 Re: Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Traffic & Parking Elements Traffic Impact Analysis Errata Gentlemen: Christopher Brown (l$ Associates 9688 Qainier Ave. &. &eattle. WA 98118-5981 '206) 7'2'2-1910 fllX. ('206) 7'2'2-1909 June 14, 2004 Pursuant to our phone conversation of this afternoon you may wish to note the following errata with respect to the subject Traffic Impact Analysis and the downward revised development density from the original 163 units to the new density with 155 units. TABLE I Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Trip Generation -Revised Time Interval Number of Trips Original Revised Reduction in Trips AWDT 453 425 -28 trips/day AM: Inbound 20 19 -1 vehicles/hour AM. Outbound 8 7 -1 vehicles/hour P.M. Inbound 24 23 -1 vehicles/hour P.M. Outbound 23 22 -1 vehicles/hour Saturday 360 341 -19 trips/day Sunday 400 378 -22 trips/day Traffic fngineers (l$ Transportation Planners Mr. Steve Friedman Mr. Curtis Beattie June 14, 2004 Page 2 Since the p.m. peak hour (design hour) trips are less than first noted, albethey by a mere one (1) trip per hour inbound and also outbound, and since the design hour trip reduction is so small, there will be no significant changes to either the LOS computations or any of the attendant TIA conclusions. In summary, the reduction in site development density as noted in Table I of page one of this letter cause no significant change to the TIA conclusions other than with respect to Table I of page 10. Consequently, this latter may be included as a part of the TIA submittal as an "errata". Yours truly, C. V. Brown, P.E.· cvb/s encl. TIA Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Table of Contents Purpose Location and Access Scope Adjacent Land Uses Phasing Street System Transit Traffic Characteristics Horizon Year Traffic Trip Generation Trip Distribution & Assignment Year 2006 Horizon Year Traffic Capacity Analysis Comments on Level of Service Parking Accidents Adverse Consequences and Mitigation Measures Conclusions List of Figures 1. 2. J 4. 5. 5. Vicinity Map Site Plan Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 2006 Peak Hour Volumes without Project Design Hour Traffic Assignment 2006 Peak Hour Volumes with Project List of Tables I II III Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Trip Generation Levels of Service Accident Frequency by Intersection· Appendix' 1. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 6. 7. 7. 7. 10. 10. l3. 14. 14. 15. 16. 16. 2. 3. 8. 9. II. 12. 10. l3. 15. Christopher Brown @ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. &attle. WA 98118-5981 ('206) 7'2'2-1910 Fax ('206) 7'2'2-1909 Merrill Gardens a TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for a 163-Unit Assisted Living Facility in the City of Renton King County Purpose Briefly, the purpose of this study is to determine the horizon year traffic impacts that may be anticipated with the completion of a 163-unit assisted living facility to be located in the northern sector of the central business district (CBD) of the City ofRentQn in a neighborhood that is recently becoming associated with new multi-family and assisted living residences. The development is to be constructed on a parcel of land located on the southeast quadrant of the intersection of S. Tobin Street and Burnett Avenue S. and extending to the south to the existing McLendon's Hardware Store in the City of Renton, King County. More particularly, the general focus of this traffic study is to obtain current traffic volume data on those local collector and arterial facilities expected to be impacted by ten (10) or more directional p.m. peak hour trips, to derive a traffic forecast of the year 2006 traffic conditions both without and with the development, and to assess the traffic circulation impacts that may be produced by site related traffic. The location of the plat is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1, of page 2 while the site layout, in a rough sketch, is shown on Figure 2 of page 3. The trip generation data for the development is based on the 7th edition of the Trip Generation Manual. -1-Christopher Brown (j$ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave.~. &attle. WA 98118-5981 ('206) 7'2'2~1910 fax ('206) 7'2'2-1909 FIGURE 1 Vicinity Map -2- Christopher Brown €J Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. &attle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 7'22-1909 fJ ~ CD " S-CD c: = :0 z: m -I -i » < rn ~ Figure 2 Site Plan -3- S. TOBIN ST. =E ::::: 5> s:: en »-< !'T1 ~ Christopher Brown (?$ A&\ociates 9688 Rainier Ave. &. &atUe. WA 98118-5981 722-1910 Fax· It may be noted that the p.m. peak hour is the highest peak hour of the average weekday since it contains work, shopping and social-recreation travel demands. Accordingly, for general residential developments such as Merrill Gardens it represents the worst case when traffic congestion is at its most severe levels. This TIA bases its conclusions and recommendations on the p.m. peak hour of the average weekday. The inclusion of a background traffic growth rate for assessing horizon year volumes is in accordance with the recommended practice of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Traffic Access and Impact Studies for Site Development, Transportation Engineering, August 1988. F or estimates of site vehicular trip production the 7th edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, for Land Use Code 254, Assisted Living, is deemed to be the applicable reference. This is because this particular ITE land use designation (associated with assisted living facilities) bridges the traffic characteristics between completely independent living, on one hand; and nursing home , living (where the latter facilities are denoted by central dining facilities and limited onsite medical care is available) on the other hand. From peak hour traffic observations at the Cedar River Terrace, located a block to the north of this site, this ITE land use code assumption is considered appropriate. Continuing, this traffic study uses a trip distribution model based on the obser.ved turning movements from the existing residences, such as Cedar River Terrace, located to the north of the intersection of S. Tobin Street and Burnett Avenue S. since they define the trip distribution of present residents of the neighborhood that will tend to model the kinds of residents and employees of Merrill Gardens. Location and Access . . The location of the proposed 163-unitMerrill Gardens was noted earlier on page 1. For the purposes of this traffic impact analysis (TIA) it is assumed that all of the site's traffic will use only a single driveway on Burnett Avenue S. so that a worst-case scenario is presented. In actual fact, a horseshoe shaped driveway will be constructed on Burnett Avenue S. for visItors while the site's parking garage facility will be accessed via an alley on the east side of the site. In tum, the alley extends to the north to S. Tobin Street and to the east to link with Williams Avenue S .. about midway between S. Tobin Street and South 2nd Street. This access is described on Figure 2. With the assumption of only a single driveway it will be seen that, as a consequence, the worst-case assumption in terms of traffic impacts will result. -4-Christopher Brown (1f Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~" &attle. WA 98118-5981· (206) 722-1910 fax. (206) 722-1909 For the purposes of this traffic study the scope of the work considers the 163-unit Merrill Gardens will impact the following intersections with 10 or more trips. • Burnett Avenue S. at South 3rd Street • Burnett Avenue S. at South 2nd Street • Burnett Avenue S. at South Tobin Street • Williams Avenue S. at South 3rd Street • Williams Avenue S. at South 2nd Street • Williams Avenue S. at South Tobin Street • Wells S. at South 3rd Street • Wells Avenue S. at South 2nd Street • Logan Avenue S. at South 2nd Street These are described schematically in the following schematic traffic diagrams. In general, the scope of the study is to address potential design needs and/or capacity restrictions, and potential traffic safety impacts on those facilities receiving ten of more site generated p.m. peak hour trips. ' Adjacent Land Uses The adjacent, developed land uses in the vicinity of the project tend to multi-family and retirement homes to the north while to the south and abutting the site is the previously noted McLendon 's Hardware Store. 'This commercial retail facility will be relocating to the former K-Mart facility on Rainier Avenue and S., Victoria Street. Immediately east of the site and east of the alley there are both singly family residences while at the north and south ends of Williams Avenue S. are commercial land uses. For the immediate locality the project tends to conform tothe neighborhood as it currently developing as evidenced by the new construction in the area. Accordingly, the Merrill Gardens project is not considered to be a conflicting land use in a traffic sense. Indeed, when contrasted against the McLendon 's HardWare Store where observed p.m. peak hour driveway volumes on June 9th showed 54 inbound and 77 outbound trips, from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m., versus a projected 24 inbound and 23 outbound trips per hour for Merrill Gardens, it is decidedly less intensive in terms of peak hour traffic demands. -5-Christopher Brown (j$ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. ~eatt1e, WA 98118-5981 722-1910 FEpt Phasing The project will be developed in a single phase. Additionally, for the purposes of this study, the total development is expected to be fully occupied in no more than 2 years, say by the end of2006. Thus, 2006 defines the horizon year for analysis purposes. Street System The local collector and arterial streets serving the project site include Burnet Avenue S. on the west side and Williams Avenue S. to the east. The former is essentially a 2-lane collector street with 2-way traffic and parking on both sides. It has a posted speed limit of25 mph. Both Wells and Williams Avenues S. form a north-south one-way couplet with parking on both sides and 25 mph speed limits. The east-west one-way couplets serving the site are South 2nd and 3rd Streets. This one-way system has traffic signals at the intersections of Wells Avenues S., Williams Avenues S., Burnett Avenue S. and Logan Avenue S. On South 3rd Street the Burnett Avenue S. intersection is offset from Smithers Avenue S. Within the CBD the South 2nd and 3rd Street one-way couplets have a posted speed limit is 25 mph .. The various intersection geometrics arid related lane assignments are included in the appended level of service (LOS) analyses. Transit Metro transit operates dial-a-ride service up Burnett Avenue S. where over the p.m. peak hour one jitney bus used the parking area in front of the Cedar River Terrace as a turnaround. The city and Metro have constructed a significant "Transit Center" immediately north of the newly built "Piazza" with access to th~ east-west couplets being from Logan and Burnett Avenues S. The "Transit Center" is constructed with eight (8) "transit bays" providing access to Metro Routes 101, 105, 106, 107, 110, 140, 143, 148, 149, 153, 169,240,342,560, 564, 565, 908, and 909. -6-Christopher Brown @ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. &. &attle. W A 98118-5981 ('206) 7'2'2-1910 fax ('206) 7'2'2-1909 Traffic Characteristics Current (early June, 2004) peak hour traffic volume data along Burnett Avenue S. and at South 2nd Street at Logan Avenue S. was obtained in the field under dry and clear weather conditions. Although this was essentially in the beginning of the summer season, no adverse weather or unusual traffic conditions existed that would skew or otherwise bias the data. Likewise, with schools in session and normal employment patterns extant, the data is considered entirely stable and useful for traffic anallsis purposes. The peak hour data at the other intersections along South 2nd and 3f Streets was obtained from the City of Renton traffic operations files. Current p.m. peak hour traffic volumes are shown' schematically on Figure 3. As a traffic diagram no scale is assumed in the drawing. The respective arrowheads for the various traffic volumes note the direction of travel. Horizon Year Traffic Figure 4 shows the 2006 horizon year traffic forecast without the proposed Merrill Gardens residential development completed. This is the baseline data. The data of Figure 4 is based on a background growth rate of2.7 percent per year . compounded to the horizon year of 2006. This rate of growth is the mean 6-year rate found on SR 167 at Automatic Data Count (ADC) station P6 located at MP 23.07 and covers the 1996 through 2002 interval. It is published by WSDOT in the latest (2002) Annual Traffic Report and is considered representative of this region. Trip Generation Trip generation for the proposed 163-unit Merrill Gardens development is based on the 7th edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, for Land Use Code 254, the applicable reference for this type of residential development as described earlier. The trip generation data for Merrill Gardens is shown on Table I of page 10. -7-Christopher Brown t11 Associates 9688 Qainier Ave. &. &attle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 7'22-1909 ~~ V S. Tobin Street j: ("1q ~ ~ "" . @ til . VI' <t Q) r..,' ::l Q) A-c: ::l "(I) Q) c: > (C(C ~ Q) > ..0 .j..J ~ , .j..J c: Q) C'{I) ttl c: 01 I- 0 V' ::l ...J . co ~.~. S. 2nd Street . ~~ ~ ~)~~ .~ ~~ '\ .£.05 . ~~0 ~~ ~~ .. ~ , South 3rd Street -'~~ ~~ ..... CJJ2 t~(10 FIGURE 3 Current P.M. Peak Hour"Traffic Volumes -8- a~~ "~ ~. VI "~" " c: Q) > ~ Ill' e ttl .-.-.... .-::3: ~y~~ ~r ..... 7e>9 ) \ r:: . r VI Q) ::l ~ '. Q) " > ~ III .-.... Q) ::3: ( . , ..e. C6~ .-; 77'l ~. ~\ I~ ~~ ) >' '/':20 ~~/~ '" .. -, " ." . "" ' .. " Chriatopher Brown ~ A660ciatea 9688 Qainier Ave, ~. &attle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722~1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 ~J ~~ S. Tobin Street ($) ~ (0\ ~ ~~ ?~ ~ . Vl (f) . Vl . ~ Q) . c.,' .,.-::l Q) ~~ c: ::l <ll c: ~ > Q) r./' « > . «. +.I +.I c: Q) ro c: 01 L. 0 ::l -I co ~ ~J (5. 2n~)~1 . "o~ ~ .-:;t;7 9'3 fill. 03''9: I~' ~~ '\ . t~( ,. South .3rd Street -'~J ~i .~. 98/ r~ 0~ FIGURE 4 2006 Peak Hour Volumes without Project -9- v~~ ~ '- ) . Vl .~. c: <ll > « Ill· E: ro .-,... ..-.-::3 bY~~ .~~ ..... 7~:r J \ ' .~. ( . n Vl Q) ::l c; " Q) > ex: III --I Q) ::3 ( . , ,.r. rOt.. ...r:; l?20 Ii <1'\ I~ \'? . .'... \\ ~~? y >'"" r67 .~~.~ "- ( Christopher Brown (If Associates 9688 Qainier Ave. ~, &Caltle, WA 98118-5981 7'2'2-1910 fax TABLE I . Merrill Gardens Trip Generation AW.D.T. AM. Inbound AM. Outbound P.M. Inbound P.M. Outbound Saturday Sunday Trip Distribution & Assignment 453 Trips/Day 20 vehicles/hour 8 vehicles/hour 24 vehicles/hour 23 vehicles/hour 360 Trips/Day 400 Trips/Day The new traffic generated by this residential development will be distributed onto the . . adjacent roadway system and then onto the regional transportation network. The traffic distribution and assignment of site-generated traffic is based on the Analogy Method as described in Transportation and Land Development by Vergil G. Stover, 1988, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE. The assignment ofp. m. peak hour site-generated traffic is shown on Figure 5. In developing this figure there are no assumed arterial capacity restraints. Additionally, it is assumed for a worst-case scenario that only one driveway exists and that is to Burnett Avenue S. In actual fact the dominant demands will be on the alley at the back of the site and from this linkage to either S. Tobin Street or Williams Avenue S., both local streets with lower traffic volumes than currently found on Burnett Avenue S. Year 2006 Horizon Year Traffic Figure 6, the 2006 Volumes with Project. displays the traffic volumes with Merrill Gardens completed and fully occupied. As described earlier, the data assumes no diversion due to inadequate traffic conditions (such as congestion) nor presumes any geometrically or capacity inadequate linkages by the horizon year of2006. To a large extent, this assumption is based on observed traffic flow that currently operates very well. This is observation confirmed by the following capacity analysis. -10-Christopher Brown (1J Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. <£>. &attle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 oj S. Tobin Street . V'l . Q) V'l :J. Q) c :J Q) c > Q) <C > ..... <C ..... Q) C C'O C L-OJ :J 0 ....I co S. 2nd Street oj t ..-c 10 \Y~ tc-~ South 3rd Street )~J ...... 0 FIGURE 5 Design Hour Traffic Assignment -11- ~ 100 \ 0.<V c.,' \ c'V~ ~. '\ .~ 0 ~ t~r:: ~ t~ V'l . Q) > <C VI L- Q) ..c ...... 0- E V'l vo~ ~ ~ . V'l ... ~. . G V'l c Q) Q) > :J <C C Q) VI > E <C C'O .-VI ----.-Q) 3: 3: ( . , y~~ 10 JO ... r:: ~ 10 o~ ~~ ;; >,". ..... 1-if ~ ('0 ~. 0 .' . ... Christopher Brown (£5. Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. &. . &attle. WA 98118·5981 7'22-1910 Fax (206) 7'22·1909 ~l ~. Y~ ,~ S. Tobin Street ( r (36 ~" ~ 6 ' lA,\\) <P . ~ . VI ., t,/) ~@ ,~ . r . ~ <V VI VI ' c: ~ :::J <V <V <V c: > :J :::J ...0 <V ~ ,C:: '. c: ,.. > <V <V Q) ~ (11 VI' > > ~ +J e c:( c:( , +J ro if' <V .-VI c: .-' 0-ro . c: .-L. -01 .-<V 0 :::J ::3 ::3 ...J co S. 2nd Street ( 1j6, 3~~' .~ , , ~J bY·~~· ~ -= ;~ ~C~ 712 8'So Cf3 ' ,..c ..-:: t~r:; »~ t~~ r; \~~ I~ \ South Jrd Street )~J .~~O . ~~ ~~ ) , >'" t~~~ 7tl ...... >" r8/ CJ1-3 ~~(1 ~. ~ \ FIGURE 6 Christopher Brown {If ASc!lOcilltes 9688 Qainier Ave. <S. ' 2006 Peak Hour Volumes with Project <seattle. WA 98118·5981 ('206) 7'22·1910 Fax ('206) 722·1909 -12- Capacity Analysis Capacity analysis is in accordance with the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and attendant intersection capacity up-dates for the new HCM 2000 publication by the Transportation Research Board. The STOP controlled intersection analysis was accomplished using the software entitled HCS 3, produced and published by the McTrans Center at the University of Florida and the Signal 97 TEAPAC software produced by Strong Concepts of Northbrook, Illinois, both used under license to Christopher Brown, P.E. The results of the analysis are noted in Table II. When reviewing the following LOS summaries, note that the computer input and results are included in the Appendix. The appendix computations show only the worst case LOS at the various STOP controlled intersections. Further, for simplicity, only the LOS and average per vehicle delay (in seconds) are used in the following table. TABLEll Levels of Service Intersection 2004 Wells Avenue S. at South 2nd Street B 12.0 sec. Williams Ave. S. at South 2nd Street A 9.6 sec.- Burnett Ave. S. at South 2nd Street B 13.9 sec. Logan Ave. S. at South 2nd Street B 11.1 sec. Wells AvenueS. at South 3rd Street A 9.4 sec. Williams Ave. S. at South 3rd Street B 12.2 sec. Burnett Ave. S. at South 3rd Street B 10.4 sec. Burnett Ave. S. at South Tobin Street A 8.9 sec. Williams Ave. S. at South Tobin Street A 9.1 sec. Burnett Ave. S. at Driveway NA -13- 2006 2006 Without With Project Project B B 12.1 sec. 12.1 sec. A A 9.7 sec. 9.7 sec. B B 14.3 sec. 14.6 sec. B B 11.2 sec. 1.1.2 sec. A A 9.7 sec. 9.7 sec. B B 12.6 sec. 12.7 sec. B B 10.7 sec. 10.9 sec. A A 8.9 sec. 8.9 sec. A A 9.2 sec. 9.2 sec. NA A 9.2 sec. Christopher Brown tl$ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. <$.eatUe. WA 98118-5981 7'22-1910 Fax Comments on Levels of Service In Table II the levels of service use the existing street geometry. In the year 2006 no changes in street geometrics or in traffic control device strategy are needed or required. The projected levels of service are all well within the adopted standards. Indeed, with the . LOS at every intersection operating at or better than LOS 'B' it may be taken that traffic operations are at very good levels: on the face of this analysis no remediation is required at all. The street network is capable of accommodating all site related design hour traffic. Parking Parking demand for ITE Land Use Code. 254, Assisted Living, has not been separately identified in the 'publication entitled Parking Generation, 2nd edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. However, the closest land use, LUC 250, Retirement Community, may provide an indication of the potential parking needs. For a 163-unit retirement community, with similar services, the week day demand would be in the range of: Minimum number of parking stalls 18 Average number of parking stalls 44 Maximum number of parking stalls 78 With some 92 stalls (+/-) being proposed it would appear by the ITE standards a sufficient number of parking stalls is being proposed. Additionall y, and attached as a part of the appendix, are the results of a parking survey conducted on behalf of the Clare Bridge assisted living facility in Federal Way. The data in this document is based on two sources: first, the Woodmark at Steel Lake in Federal Way and the Kamlu retirement facility in Vancouver, Clark County. ' At Woodmark at Steel Lake the maximum observed demand for parking produced a rate of 0.42 stall per unit. For Merrill Gardens this would imply a peak parking demand for 68 parking stalls. At the Kamlu facility the maximum observed demand for parking produced a rate of 0.29 parking stalls per unit. For Merrill Gardens this would imply a peak parking demand for some 47 parking stalls. -14-Christopher Brown (£1 Ac!Ic!Iociates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. ~eattle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 7'22-1910 fax. (206) 7'22-1909 Considering that these two estimates essentially range between the average and upper parking demands published by ITE, and that the maximum ITE rate is (78/92) about 85 percent of what is proposed, there is no reason to believe that a parking shortage will arise given the amount of on-site parking being proposed. Accidents Accident data was obtained from the City of Renton Public Works Department files for the complete or full years record covering 2001,2002, and 2003. The assembled accident data shows the following frequencies by location. TABLEll Accident Frequency by Intersection * • Burnett Avenue S. at South 3rd Street • Burnett Avenue S. at South 2nd Street • Burnett Avenue S. at South Tobin Street • Williams Avenue S. at South 3rd Street • Williams Avenue S. at South 2nd Street • Williams Avenue S. at South Tobin Street • Wells S. at South 3rd Street • Wells Avenue S. at South 2nd Street • Logan Avenue S. at South 2nd Street • Logan/Smithers at South 3rd Street • Morris Avenue S. at South 3,rd Street • Whitworth Avenue S. at South 3rd Street • Shattuck Avenue S. at South 3rd Street • Morris Avenue S. at South 2nd Street . d • Whitworth Avenue S. at South 2n Street • Shattuck Avenue S. at South 2nd Street 8 4 o 14 15 o 10 30 25 4 8 4 8 8 10 9 * See Alpendix for additional analysis based on the Control Chart Method with p = 0.95 By intersection it will be seen that by the site at S. Tobin Street there were no recorded traffic accidents. Further, from S. 2nd Street to S. Tobin Street on Burnett Avenue S. there were only three accidents over this same time period. On involved a sideswipe type of accident, a second was a right angle type (probably from one of the McLendon's Hardware store driveways), and a third involved a bicycle. -15-Christopher Brown (iJ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. &. &attle. WA 98118-5981 ('206) 7'2'2-1910 Fax ('206) 7'2'2-1909 Considering the three mid-block accidents on Burnett Avenue S. it appears the 3-year accident rate is in the order of about 4.948 accidents per million vehicle miles of travel. For an urban area, one close the Renton CBD, this does not appear to be out of the ordinary when urban communities, as a whole, across the state (1996 Washington State Highway Accident Report, page 1-6) had an average accident rate of 4.27 per million vehicle miles of travel on collector roads for the last published year. Continuing, the overall average intersection accident frequency for the local street system shown in Table III is (157/16) 9.813 accidents withthe adjacent key site related intersection at Burnett Avenue S. at South 2nd Street having a frequency of only 8 accidents over the three years. On the basis ofraw accident data it seems that Burnett Avenue S. at South 2nd Street and Burnett Avenue from South 2nd Street to South Tobin Street is not a significant accident generator. Moreover, the departure of the existing McLendon's Hardware Store to a new location and the vacation of the premises will likely reduce the accident frequency to an even lower level. In summary, accident causation or culpability does not appear to be an adverse element with respect to the new Merrill Gardens facility. , Adverse Consequences and Mitigation Measures This project will not induce any adverse traffic impacts. Since the levels of service are all well within adopted standards and since the local street system's accident history does not portray the key access facility as having a significant historical frequency, no traffic mitigation measures are required. Fundamentally, the local street network will continue to function very well on completion of the project. ' Conclusions The following conclusions may be considered with respect to the proposed 163-unit assisted living residential development -Merrill Gardens. • • -16- The development will conform to the neighborhood as it is currently developing . The road network under review in this traffic impact analysis (TIA) includes ,the two local north-south streets providing immediate access to the site -Burnett and Williams Avenues S. and the key local east-west one-way couplet of South 2nd and 3rd Streets. Christopher Brown @ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. &attle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 .• . All of these roads serving project related traffic currently have more than adequate levels of service. -17- • Based on the 7th edition of Traffic Generation published by Institute of Transportation Engineers for Land Use Code 254, Assisted Living, the facility when fully occupied will generate 453 trips peer day on a weekday, 360 trips per day on a Saturday, and 400 trips per day on a Sunday. • On a weekday the morning peak hour will generate 28 trips per hour while the p.m. peak hour will generate 47 trip during the p.m. peak hour. • For analysis purposes the time when the project is complete and fully occupied is taken at the year 2006. This is the horizon year for the TIA. • The traffic assignment of site-generated traffic is based on the currently observed distribution patterns on Burnett Avenue S. at South Tobin Street where a similar facility is located and serves as a model for Merrill Gardens. • By the horizon year of2006 without project development the worst-case LOS will be at 'B' with the delay being 14.3 seconds. This will be found at Burnett Avenue S. at South 2nd Street. • All other locations will have better levels of service and smaller delays by the horizon year of 2006 without project. • With the addition of project generated traffic the above noted worst-case LOS will essentially remain unchanged but the delay will increase to 14.6 seconds. • There is no significant accident hazard along Burnett Avenue S. or at its key intersection on South 2nd Street. • With entirely adequate LOS standards being maintained up through the year 2006 and with no immediate accident hazard issues identified it may be concluded that the project will produce no significant direct traffic impacts to the road system. • From a traffic perspective, while additional traffic will be borne by the network, there are no documented adverse traffic consequences. • On the basis of the foregoing analysis no traffic mitigation is required since no adverse traffic impacts are anticipated as a direct result of the project. Christopher Brown (lJ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. &attle. WA 98118-5981 722-1910 Fax Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Appendix Table of Contents o ITE LUC 254, Assisted Living -Description o ITE LUC 254, Assisted Living -weekday traffic o ITE LUC 254, Assisted Living -Saturday o ITE LUC 254, Assisted Living -Sunday o Parking Generation -Retirement Community, LUC 250 o Parking Study for the Clare Bridge Assisted Living Facility -12/31/98 o Accident Data, 2001 through 2003, full years only ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 2nd Street east of Logan Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 2nd Street east of Burnett Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 2nd Street east of Williams Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 2nd Street east of Wells Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 3rd Street east of Logan Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 3rd Street east of Burnett Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts;-South 3rd Street east of Williams Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 3rd Street east of Wells Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 2nd Street @ Wells Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 2nd Street @ Williams Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 2nd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 3rd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 3rd Street @ Williams Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 3rd Street @ Wells Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South Tobin Street @ Williams Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South Tobin Street @Burnett Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 2nd Street @ Logan Avenue S. Levels of Service South 2nd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Williams Avenue S. Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project MG-C1P MG-H1P MG-P1P MG-C2P MG-H2P 1. 3. 5. 7. 9. Christopher Brown t£1 Associates 9688 Qainier Ave. ~. ~eatt1e. WA 98118-5981 . ('206) 7'2'2-1910 Fax ('206) 7'2'2-1909 Levels of Service Continuation South 2nd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Logan Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Logan Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Logan Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Williams Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Williams Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Williams Avenue S. Site Driveway @Burnett Avenue S. 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project' 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project· 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project 2006 with Project MG-P2P MG-C3P MG-H3P MG-P3P MG-C4P MG-H4P MG-P4P MG-CSP MG-HSP HG-PSP HG-C6P HG-H6P HG-P6P HG-C7P HG-H7P HG-P7P HG-C8P HG-H8P HG-P8P' HG-C9P HG-H9P HG-P9P HG-PlOP 11. 13. IS. 17. 19: 21. 23. 2S. 27. 29. 31. 33. 3S. 37. 39. 41. 42. 43. 44. 4S. 46. 47. 48. Appendix -Statistical Analysis of Intersection Accidents Chrislopher Brown {]J Associales 9688 Rainier Ave. <£>. <£>eallle, WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 TRIP GENER liON lth Edition • Volume 2 of 3 TRIP GENERATION RATES, PLOTS AND EQUATIONS • Port and Terminal (Land Uses 000-099) • Industrial (Land Uses 100-199) • Residential (Land Uses 200-299) • Lodging (Land Uses 300-399) • Recreational (Land Uses 400-499) Institute of Transportation Engineers Description Land Use: 254 Assisted. Living Assisted living complexes are residential settings that provide either routine general protective oversight or assistance with activities necessary for independent living to mentally or physically limited persons. They commonly have separate living quarters for residents and services include dining, housekeeping, social and physical activities, medication administration and transportation. Alzheimer's and ALS care are commonly offered by these facilities, though the living quarters for these patients may be located separately from the other residents. Assisteq care commonly bridges the gap between independent living and nursing homes. In some areas' of the country, assisted living residences may be called personal care, residential care, or domiciliary care. Staff may be available at an assisted care facility 24 hours a day, but skilled medical care-which is limited in nature-is not required. Continuing care retirement community (Land Use 255) and nursing home (Land Use 620) are related uses. Additional Data The rooms in these facilities may be private or shared accommodations, consisting of either a single room or a small apartment-style unit with a kitchenette and living space. One study reported that according to national and local data, less than 5 percent of the residents owned cars, which were rarely driven. Em'ployees, visitors and delivery trucks make most of the trips to these facilities. Truck traffic was captured for some studies in this land use and is presented in the table below. Although truck traffic was very low overall, the most trips occurred during the mid-day period on a weekday. The peak hour of the generator typically did not coincide with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic, primarily because of the shifts of the employees. For the data collected in this land use, shifts typically began at 7:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m. and 11 :00 p.m. The a.m. peak hour of the generator typically occurred from 6:00 a.m.-7:00 a.m., while the p.m. peak hour of the generator typically occurred from 3:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. Time Period % Trucks Weekday Morning 1 (6:30 a.m.-9:30 a.m.) Weekday Mid-Day 9 (11 :00 a.m.-1 :30 p.m.) Weekday Evening 2 (2:45 p.m.-6:45·p.m.) Saturday Mid-Day 4 (11 :00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.) Saturday Evening 0 (3:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m.) Sunday Mid-Day 1 (11 :00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.) Sunday Evening 0 (3:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m.) Trip Generation, 7th Edition 477 Institute of Transportation Engineers Assisted Living (254) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Beds On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 15 Average Number of Occupied 8eds:117 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting . Trip Generation per Occupied Bed Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.74 1.88 4.14 1.75 Data Plot and Equation CIl 'C C W 0. ·c I- CD (3 :c ~ ~ ~ « II I- 600.------------------------------------------------------------. //:' ..... ~ .... , , , , 500 .. - . ~ . - - -;. - -.. ;. - - -';' .. -.;-.... ;. - . --;--.. -:-- . --;-- - . ';' .. --;. - - --:-. >~>~< ~ .. --: -... . " , ............ ~ .... . " ,~ .~ ; ................ , 400 .... ;-... -:-.. --:-- - --:-----;' . - --;-.. --;' .... : .. ~,-,>~/'~----';-. * '.,' ~ ................ ~ x: x ~ , 300 . ....; ... -~~ - . -i'· -.: ... -.:., .. --: ---.. : .. -.. : ... -.: -. ---: ---. ~ ---- ....... ~ ...... . " ~' ,. . , ...... '/ )( · . .....-: . . . . , . . . . , . . 200 -. -' ~ --x '~''''~~~ -:-. --<" -_. <' -.. '>. -_.> ... ':' -_. ":' . --':' ----;--.. '> -.. -;--. -:. _. -: -. _. · ...... x · " ,,' 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 X = Number of Occupied Beds X Actual Data Points ---Fitted Curve ------Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 1.61 (X) + 132.16 R2 =0.58 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 480 Institute of Transportation Engineers ,. , Land Use: 254 Assisted Living Independent Variables with One Observation The following trip generation data are for independent variables with only one observation. This information is shown in this table only; there are no related plots for these data. Users are cautioned to use data with care because of the small sample size. Independent Variable o . dB d ccuple e s Weekday a.m. Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Weekday p.m. Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Weekday a.m. Peak Hour of Generator Trip Generation, 7th Edition Trip Generation Rate 0.17 0.29 0.25 Size of Independent Variable 87 87 87 479 Number of Studies 1 1 1 Directional Distribution 73% entering, 27% exiting 52% entering, 48% exiting 77% entering, 23% exiting Institute of Tra~sportation Engineers I 1 I Assisted Living (254) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Beds On a: Saturday Number of Studies: 15 Average Number of Occupied Beds: 117 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Bed Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.20 1.45 3.53 1.57 Data Plot and Equation ~ c W a. ·c I- (I) :g ..c: ~ (I) Cl I!! (I) ~ II I- 500.-----------------------~----------------------------------~ , x ....... < .... ~............ , , , , , . . , , . . . . '/ .... , . 400 .: .. "" ....... , ..... , ..... ' ..... ' ..... , ..... , ..... , ..... , ..... ' ..... ' .... "'~"""""'" • • • • • • • , • • '. : /"" ....... -'1 , , , " ;", .... " , I ........ ;' ,,/,,~, ,~ 300 -.... : .... .; .... .; .... .; .... .; ..... ;. ... .; ..... ;.. ;~'.;. ... x .... ;. .... ;. .... ;. ... ~ .... ~ .... .,' . . . . //,,<1 x-' >< x: " >// ; , ... ", >.< ,,' ........ ~ 200 ... X . ·x· : .... : ... )~~/ . .; ..... : .... ~ .... :-.... :-.... :-.... :-.... : ..... : .... ~ .... ~ ~ ... : ............. >:< ,~ , ,'~,/' '/ )' 100 II I I II I I I I I I 50 . 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 X = Number of Occupied Beds X Actual Data Points ------Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not given R2 = **** Trip Generation, 7th Edition 482 Institute of Transportation Engineers Assisted Living (254) AverageVehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Beds On a: Sunday Number of Studies: 15 Average Number of Occupied Beds: 117 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Bed Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.44 1.67 3.73 1.65 Data Plot and Equation 600~----~------~------~------------------------------------~ 500 .... , .... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... , ..... , ..... , ..... , .... ~ .... ~ .. ~.~. . , , , , , , . , , , '. ' : ..... ;, ..... ,.. , ~~ .... : ..... "" ~~ >~ ~~~~~~~: 400 .... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... ' ..... '.~< .. ' ..... ' .... .'. , • • • 'J' •. , , : .... ~.... • , , ~~ ,~~ , ..... ...-: , ","" x ,~~ ~ ~~ ~ .......... , , . . , , . , ........ "'" , , . . , . . 300 .... .-.... ,-.... " .... " ... ',' ... ',' ..... ~/. . ... ',' ... ',' ... ',' ... ',' ... ',' ... ',' ... ; .... x: ~, , ~~ ,~~ x ~~, • ...'" I ,~~ . , ' ............ x . , x ,. . I , • , • • 200 .... , ..... " ~~~ ... , ..... , ..... , ..... , ..... , ..... , ..... , ..... , ..... , .... , .... , .... , .... x : / ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ 100 ' 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 x = Number of Occupied Beds X Actual Data Points ----Fitted Curve ------Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.69 Ln(X) + 2.36 R2 =0.57 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 484 Institute of Transportation Engineers 'j \ fI: :. ;. -. -r. t 2nd Edition ; .. INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS , CHRlSlOPHER BROWN, P.£. ~ e on I, I I I I I I I I I I I I LAND USE: 250 RETIREMENT COMMUNITY (Senior Citizen Multi-Family Residential) DESCRIPTION Retirement communities, restricted to adults or senior citizens, contain residential units similar to apart- ments or condominiums and are usLially self-con- tained villages. They may also contain special ser- vices such as medical services, dining facilities, and some limited supporting retail uses, All facilities surveyed were located in suburban Chi- cago. The number of dwelling units ranged from 51 to 203 .. PARKING CHARACTERISTICS AND DATA LIMITATIONS As expected, the parking rate for retirement com- munities is lower than other multi-family residential facilities. The weekend rates are higher than week- day rates due to visitors. More data are needed.to provide more meaningful parking rates. Parking Generation, August 198711nstitute of Transportation Engineers 35 Average. Rate 0.27 90 Q 80 w a:: ::> 70 () () 0 CJ) 60 w () ~ 50 CJ) (!) z 40 52 a: ~ 30 ~ « w 20 a.. " 0-10 0 RETIREMENT :COMMUNITY {2S0} (Senior Citizen Multi-Family Residential) Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs: DWELLING UNITS On a: WEEKDAY PARKING GENERATION RATES Range of Rates Standard Deviation Numberof . Studies Average Number of Dwelling Units 0.11-'-0.48 * 4 125 DATA PLOT AND EQUATION CAUTION-USE CAREFULLY-SMALL SAMPLE SIZE.· Cl Cl 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 x = NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS tJ ACTUAL DATA POINTS FInED CURVE Lq Fitted.Curve Equation: Ln(P) = 1.75(X) -4.97 R2 = 0.~45 " Parking Generation; August 1987/1nstitute of Transportation Engineers 36 Christopher Brown (f1 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. ~eattle .. WA 98118-5981 72'2-1910 Fax The Neil Walter Company PARKING STUDY for the CLARE BRIDGE Assisted Living Facility in the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY King County· December 31, 1998 Traffic I08ineers (f1 Transportation Planners The Neil Walter Company a PARKING STUDY for the CLARE BRIDGE Assisted Living Facility I Table pf Contents i Dntroduction & Purpos~ ~arking Study Sites Eimploymen t Data ~arking Survey Data F!indings Rjecommendation Table iI Table ill The Kamlu Staffing The Kamlu Parking Duration 1 . 1 • 2. 3. 4. 4. 2. 4. Christopher Brown' (£1 Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. ~eattle. WA 98118-5981 ('206) 7'2'2-1910 fax ('206) 7'2'2-1909 The Neil Walter Company a PARKING STUDY for the CLARE BRIDGE Assisted Living Facility in the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY King County Intro~ction and Purpose The Ne~l Walter Company is proposing to construct a 48-room, 68-be~ congregate care facility on a parcel of land situated in Federall Way on the southeast corner of the intersection of 1 st Avenu~ S. and S. 349th Street. Parkin!g for the assisted living facility includes 6 stalls on a 6ircu~ar driveway at the front of the building, including 2 handiciapped parking stalls, and 19 stalls at the back along with space ifor a "dumpster". In total, 25 parking stalls are to be provid!ed. The p~rposes of this parking study is to ascertain if the propo~ed number of parking spaces is, in fact, sufficient for accom~odating the projected parking demands. ! Parki~g study Sites To co~lect parking data of like kind and like sized facilities the c~ty of Federal Way recommended that the recently occupied woodm~rk at Steel Lake be monitored. This facility is an assisbed living residence home devoted principally to both frail elder~y and Alzheimer's patients. The residential density is desigried for 103 clients. As of December 1998 there are 98 now resid~nt representing an occupancy level of 95 percent. In addition, a second facility somewhat smaller in scale and thus dloser in size to the proposed Clare Bridge was also -1- Christopher Brown (1J Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. &. &eattle. WA 98118-5981 ('206) 7'2'2-1910 Fax ('206) 7'2'2-1909 I monito~ed. The Kamlu assisted living facility in Hazel Dell, a neighb~rhood of Vancouver, Clark County, Washington, was monito~ed over the same day. Kamlu has 60 rooms with a 71 bed capaci~y. As of this date it has 70 clients representing an occupaJncy rate of 99 percent. EmploYfent Data i The Ka6lu, being close in residential density to Clare Bridge, may b~ used as a reference point in terms of staft and thus staff ~elated parking demands. staff includes: . ' -2- TABLE I The Kamlu Staffing A.M. Shift (6:00 -2:00 P.M.) Administrator Maintenance Activities Secretary/Bookkeeper Housekeeper/Services Ki tchem Staff Aides Charge Nurse -1 (2 on Wednesdays) 1 1 . 1 3 2 4 1 P.M. Shift (2:00 -10:00) Aides Charge Nurse Kitchen Staff 4 1 3 Night Shift (10:00 P.M. -6:00 A.M.) Aides Charge Nurse Laundry 2 1 1 Christopher Brown (1f Associates 9688 Rainier. Ave. S. Seattle. WA 98118-5981 7'22-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 I parkinp Survey Data . ! The pa~king survey at the Woodmark at Steel Lake extended from 7:00 a~m. to 7:00 p.m. The survey was an occupancy survey taken at 20 minute intervals. The objective of this parking survey was to! determine the maximum on-site parking density. ;: The ma~imum observed parking density was 41 vehicles. This took place ~t 11 :20 in the morning. Note that one of the parked vehiclbs is a mini-bus used for client trips and recreation. This i~ commonly found at assisted living facilities and is therefpre considered a component of the parking demand. On the! basis of the Woodmark at Steel Lake parking survey the follow~ng parking parameter (41/98) is noted. M~ximum Parking Demand 0.42 stalls/bed Being ~ Wednesday, (December 30th) when the Kamlu has a 2:00 p.m. s~aff me~ting attended by all employees, its parking survey was de~igned to measure not only parking demand but also parking durati~n. Accordingly, the study was in the form of a license plate $urvey where every license plate is noted, in this case at half hburly intervals. The survey was conducted from 10:00 a.m. to6:0~ p.m. and yields total parking volume, maximum parking dehsitr' minimum duration, maximum duration, and stall turnover. The makimum parking density took place at 2:00 p.m., not unexpebted given the staff meeting, with 20 vehicles parked. Its ke~ parking parameter is (20/70) therefore: M~ximum Parking Demand 0.29 stalls/bed Additi~nally, the supplementary data includes: -3- M~nimum parking duration Maximum parking duration A~erage parking duration V~lume P~rking Turnover Rate (48/27) 30 minutes 8+ hours 5.1 hours 48 cars 1.78 cars/stall Christopher Brown €$ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. S. Seattle. WA 98118-5981 ('206) 7'2'2-1910 fax ('206) 7'2'2-1909 · ! From t~e Kamlu data Table ~I, below. the typical parking duration is shown in ! TABLE II The Kamlu Parking Duration i I ! I I ! Findin~s i I Duration 30 minutes 1 hour 1.5 hours 2 hours 2.5 hours 8+ hours No. of Vehicles 11 vehicles 5 II 0 " 1 " 1 " 26 vehicles There ~re two important findings from these surveys. I First,! parking at these kinds of facilities tends to be. long term 0t one hand and short term on the other: there is not much demand for mid-term parking. Likewise, typical short term parkin , under half an hour, is not common. This implies that parkinp lot designs do not need to consider angle parking or any kind o~ one-way aisle arrangement. Ninety degree parking will be adeHuate and aisles can be 2-way. ! secondl based on t~e Woodmark at Steel take parking surv~y, the demandi for parking at Clare Bridge will be in th~ order of: I I 0.42 stalls/bed X 68 beds = 29 ~ialls I i I I Recomm~ndation I For cltre Bridge, the presently designed 25 parking stall lots should be increased to provide 29 parking stalls. These can be added 0 the south or rear lot. I· . I -4- Chrislopher Brown (1) Associales 9688 Rainier Ave. &. &eattle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 7'2'2-1909 City of Renton Corridor Report 6/7/2004 Report Period: 0110112001 to 12/3112003 Corridor: THIRD ST. S between SHATTUCK AVE S and WELLS AVE S Comment: .For Chris Brown, 206-722-1910 Re: Merrill Gardens Center, Sr. Units SHATTUCK AVE S at THIRD ST. S Year: 2001 Date Collision Thu-I11I12001 Wed-3/14/2001 Fri-6/22/200 1 Sat-7/28/2001 Thu-1I115/2001 , .. ~ .. Time Of Collision 07:39 AM 05:30 PM 10:35 AM 04:50PM 12:58 PM . Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Date Collision Fri-2/8/2002 W ed-2/27 /2002 Mon-3/25/2002 Mon-7/1 /2002 Time Of Collision 09:10 AM 03:36 AM 05:44 PM 10:09 AM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 Date Collision Wed-6/4/2003 Time of Collision 01:00 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot NUn1Q~r TYQ~ 9i~2U5~iQ!1... ..... Y~hl~ .. y~h 2 ..... f_at.. !!tL.rDQ._. __ Rul}_~.y~~, 01-0034 Pedestrian/CyClist Involved W->E S->N 1 HI! 01-02191 Right Angle S->E W->E P H 2 i 01-557 Approach Tum N->E S->N 2 21 01-663 Right Angle W ->E S->E 3 3 I 01-!004 J:l~~~~!I'i~~y"~!i~~!ll~~J~~~_ ..... _.~:?§ __ . _____ E-~~ __ ......... _.. 1 ... __ . ___ . __ ... _ .... U 5 Totals: 0 7 1 2 9 Case Direction Num Num Hit & . Tot Number .Type Of~<?IE~2I!.. ... ' . ____ y eh 1_. __ ..Y eh.J. __ YllL __ !!tLJ.~.DO __ Ru!1 __ S_~, 02-0121 Fixed ObjectlParked VehiCle N->S Prk P 3 ! . 02-0164 Fixed Object/Parked VehiCle S->E P 1 i 02-246 Pedestrian/CyClist Involved S->E E->W 1 ! 02-519 Ri~ht Angle . W->~. __ ._~.?'t.l.__.~ __ . __ ._ ... ~_~J 4 Totals: 0 1 3 0 7 Case Direction Number Type of C()lli§iotl .... ____ .. _____ . __ .. Yt'll1J Veh 2 03-447C Rear End 1 10 W->E W->E Totals: Totals:. 0 Num Num Hit & Tot Fat .... InLXQQ ... Run Veh p'-'il --_. __ . ----_._. o o 1 o 2 8 5 2 18 THIRD ST. S, 87 ft. WofWHITWORTH AVE S Year: 2002 Date Collision Tue-3/1912002 Time Of Collision 05:10PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Number Type of G()m~!on 02-224 Sideswipe 1 1 THIRD ST. S at WHITWORTH AVE S Direction Num Num Hit & Tot _. _____ Y~l1 t. __ Yt:h ~ ___ .. _~~L_!l)L.YJ:)O ____ R~_._.Y~h., ____ ~.~~~ ____ ~~::>~.___ .___.I> . ___ ... ~ ______ ... f Totals: 0 0 1 0 Totals: 0 o 1 o . Year: 2002 Date Collision Sat-12/14/2002 Time Of Collision 04:30 PM Yeariy Totals: Number of Coiiisio Year: 2003 Date Collision t Tue-6/24/2003 - Tue-7 129/2003 Thu-11113/2003 Time Of Collision 04:47 PM 07:23 PM 03:31 PM -Yearly Totals: Number ofCoIlisio- Link Totals: Number of CoIlisio Case Number __ Typ_e~q::om_~i()p: __ 02-1 0591 Sideswi.R~ 1 Direction -Veh 1 Veh 2 W->E -W->E Totals: Num Fat o Num Hit& Tot I!1LJ~QQ _____ :RuI} ____ y~l!" _____ ____ ~____ H ~i o 1 1 2 Case -Direction Num Num Hit & Tot NumberIyp~_ of9QW~j_Q.1! _ __ ___ _ ______________ Y~_llL __Y~hl _____ r!l! ___ !!1L.rl?Q ____ B!ll! __ Yeh_1 03-514 Right Angle S-> N W ->E . P 21 03-614 Sideswipe W->N W->E P 21 03-966 Rear End _________ }\'->E W->E I __ '!I 3 Totals: 0 1 2 0 8 4 Totals: 0 1 3 1 10 MORRIS AVE S at THIRD ST. S Year: 2002 . i Date Collision Time Of Collision 09:50AM 09:34AM 04:19 PM 10:27 AM Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot _ NU!Dper __ Type 9f G2.m~iQD.. ___ _________ _____ Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat I!.li_J~Q~ ____ Bl:lIl ___ Y~~_1 Sun-3/17/2002 Fri-5/24/2002 Fri-9/20/2002 Sat-I 1/9/2002 02-219 Right Angle 02-415 Rear End 02-758 Rear End Yearly Totals: Num-ber o{CoiHsio 02-932_~ght !\!1.s.I(;l _____ _ 4 Year: 2003 Date Collision Thu-5/15/2003 Wed-6/25/2003 -Thu-l0/23/2003 Sun-12/14/2003 Time Of Case Collision Number _Type ()f.C2Djsiop:_ 07:16 PM 03-393 Sideswipe 02:30 PM 03-517C Sideswipe 02:23 PM 03-898 Right Angle 10: 19 AM _ 03-1 0891 Right Angl<;l Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 4 Link Totals: Number of Collisio 8 SMITHERS AVE S at THIRD ST. S Year: 2001 W->E S->N 3 3! 1 21 P 21 __________________________________ ..I W->E W->E W->E W->E W->E N->S .... _-.. _--_._---.. -- Totals: 0 4 2 0 9 Direction Num Num Hit& Tot -----------~~!~----~~~:----X<lL--J!1jrl?~------B-un---y-~}1 W->E W->N P -21 W->E S->N P 2-, N->S W->E P 2 ______________________ J Totals: o o 4 0 8 Totals: 0 4 6 o 17 Date Collision Time Of Collision 03:09 PM. Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot W ed-7/25/2001 Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Date Collision Fri-9/20/2002 Time Of Collision 09:57 AM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Number Type ofC()!1i~t().!! __ .______ Veh 1 Veh 2 01-653 Sideswipe_ __ ____________ S->N S">N Fat IIJi ~PQO__ _Bll.l! ___ 'y~}1_, P ___ ~.i 1 Totals: 0 o 1 0 2 2 Totals: 0 1 1 o 4 Page 2 THIRD ST. S, 35 ft. E of SMITHERS AVES Year: 2003 Date Time Of Collision Collision i _ Thu~7110/2903 05:0JI~M Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Number. TypeofC911isJo.!.1_ 03-562 Rear End 1 1 Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 W->E W->E --.-.. -.. -.~---.-------.--..... -~.-.. - Totals: Totals: 0 Num Fat o 1 Num ~!.11 __ I'I)O. 1 1 0 o Hit & . Tot Run Veh .-.......... -.-. ---··-·-l _. __ • ___ ~ •• _._.~ ____ .1 o o LOGAN AVE S at THIRD ST. S Year: 2002 Date Collision Fri-5/24/2002 Time Of Collision 06:14 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 Date Collision Thu-l/2/2003 Fri-12/5/2003 Time Of Collision 08:25 PM 06:20 AM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number ._ Type _of ~gJli§ion ________________ . __ Yt'?h 1 .. yeI12 .. ___ .¥a,t .. __ liJ.jJQ9 __ .R.l!!l ___ Yl::h, 02-416 Rear ~n~__ ___ . ___ .. _____ __ .W->E W->E 1.___ _____~j 1 Totals: 0 1 0 0 2 Case Number 03-0003 03-1046 2 3 Type of Co!!i~jOI! Sideswipe Side~wipe Direction Num Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat .... -.. _.--_. .. '-'-~--' --.. W->N W->N W->E W->E Totals: 0 Totals: 0 Num Hit& Tot _ liJ.iYP_Q __ . _ B.!!!.1. ___ .Y eh , 1 21 ____ .R ___ .__. ______ .__ }J 1 1 0 4 2 1 o 6 BURNETT AVE S at THIRD ST. S Year: 2001 Year: 2002 Date Collision Sat-ll/9/2002 Time Of Collision 09:03 PM Yearly 'totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 Date Collision Thu-l/912003 Thu-411 0/2003 Time Of Collision 12:20 PM 12:40 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Ini PD~ Run Veh .. Oi~9i9~:~gh.t~~~iie ____ ._=~--~=~_-~-~=~~~~=W~?~_~~~~;E _. __ :~.~.~:-._~~-:--___ =~~:.~.~=~== ___ 1J 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Case Number Type_ ()rG~m~jQ!1__ __ . 03-0026 Sideswipe 03-286 Rear End 2 4 . Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 W->N W->E W->E W->E Totals: Totals: 0 Num Fat o Num Hit& Tot ...... 1_!.1i_._ I'P9_. __ .~l!I}. __ yeh., P 21 . ! __ ._._--}j 1 1 0 4 1 3 o 8 THIRD ST. S, 150 ft. W of WILLIAMS AVE S· Page 3 Year: 2002 Date Collision Wed-3/2'0/2002 Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit& Tot Collision ..... Nu,ll111e_r.IYI'~ 9J~.QJlisiQ!!._. _________ ._ .. __ ._y"e.h.L .' Y~h]._. ___ .t'.at .._!!IL_rDQ ___ .. ..Run ---.Y~h.l 04:25PM 02-0228C Sideswipe ........ _ .. _. __ ._._W->E_Y{~::-§.. ...... . .. ____ . ___ ~_._._ .. _. ___ .. _ ... _._1 Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 Link Totals: Number of Collisio 1 Totals: 0 o 1 o THIRD ST. S, 50 rt. W or WILLIAMS AVE S Year: 2001 Date Collision Sat-8/1l/200 1 Time Of Collision 10:50AM , ., ". . . .... Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Number Type of GgIJisiQ.n_ .. ________. _____ V:~h I Veh 2 o 1-71~ _ .Fixe~ ()~J!()~~!J<:~.9_ . .Y~hi~.~ ____ . ___ J:l.~k W ->E 1 Totals: 1 Totals:' 0 Num Num Hit & Tot Fat)I]LPPQ __ .. Ru,I!. __ Y~i1_1 . P __________ .i o 0 1 0 o 1 o THIRD ST. S at WILLIAMS AVE S Year: 2001 Date Collision Mon-l/221200 1 Sun-4/291200 1 Thu-5/311200 1 Time Of Collision 11,30 AM 04:46 PM 05:56 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Date Collision Tue-4/2/2002 Thu-4/25/2002 Fri-6/7 12002 Mon-7/8/2002 Tue-8/6/2002 Time Of Collision 01:48 PM 02:28 PM 07:01 PM 10:02 PM 01:37 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 Date Collision Thu-2/6/2003 Thu-2/2012003 Sat-3/8/2003 W ed-7 19/2003 Thu-7 131/2003 Wed-9Il 0/2003 Time Of Cgllision 11:54 AM 02:26PM 09:08AM 03:16 PM 08:17 PM 11:14 AM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot N\l111b~ __ Iyp~ ()J C_oll!~.i.QI]_ _ _____ . ______ . ____ y t:l.h.l ___ Yt:lh1_._ ..... EaL_ .. J!1j~PJ2.Q ____ ~un ___ y~h._ 01-0067 RightAngle W->E N->S P 2 'II 01-389 Right Angle N->S W->E 3 2 0l~489 __ B-i_g~!l\!!.gl~ ______ .. ____ W.:?§_. _~->.~___ 1 ... __ . ___ . ___ ~_ . ..l..1 3 Totals: 0 4 1 0 7 Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number Type _QfG.Q1!i~!Q.I]_ _ ___ . _____________ Y~41 Veh 2 Fat. J!1i __ rPQ__R~Il __ Y~h., 02-262 Right Angle W->E N->S I 2 i 02-324 Right Angle W->E N->S 1 21 02-450 Right Angle W->E N->S 1 2 r 02-5351 Right Angle N->E W->E P 21 02~.~24_ Si_d~s.~.i.Qe . .. ______ . _______ !'l'~?.1~.. ... N->~ __ ... ___ . 1 ___________ ~ 5 Totals: 0 4 1 0 10 Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot ~~-~~~~~~~i~~~om~iQ..~.--------.. ------~~tL .-V ~h ~_ .. f~t __ J~L_rR~ _____ R~Il. __ .y~_1 03-0148 RightAngle' N->S W->E 2 ~I 03-191 Right Angle N->S W->E 1 2: 03-558 Right Angle W->E N->S P 2 I 03-625 Right Angle' W->E N->S 1 21 03-748 Right~g!e ______ ________ . __ . __ W~?E _____ ~~.>~_ ... _____ . _ 3 ______ ._. _____ .?J 6 Totals: 0 7 2 0 11 14 Totals: 0 15 4 o 28 THIRD ST. S at WELLS AVE S Year: 2001 Page 4 Date Collision' Sun-2/18/2001 Time Of Collision 04:00AM . Yearly Totals: Number of Collislo Year: 2002 Date Collision Fri-IIII12002 W ed-l /23/2002 Sun-4114/2002 Time Of Collision 01:46 PM 07:16 AM 08:58 AM Yearly Totals: Number ofCoilisio Year: 2003 Date Time Of Collision Collision Sat-4/5/2003 07:07 AM Wed-4/9/2003 09:33 PM Wed-7/30/2003 04:43 PM Mon-8/4/2003 09:48 AM Sun-8/31/2003 11: lOAM I Sun-lI12/2003 10:06 AM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Totals for Corridor Number of Collisions: Total Vehicles Involved: Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot .NuIl!b()!. __ Iyp()_()L<2()llisiQ!l.· .. ___ . __ ._...:_._ . ...Y~4J_.. Veh 2 Fat Inj PD~ Run Veh 01-01481 . Fixed O~J.ec:tlP!!f~t?~.Y ~}!!~!~______YY.-> E._.. . __ ............ --------. ---~~~~ .. ~~~~: __ .-=.~_ .. (] 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 1 Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Ye..h.L_ Veh 2 __ J:'~t. ... !gLI'J)9 ____ fu!l!._ye..h_, W->E S->N 1 2 i S->N W->E P 2 i I Number. 1'ypeof G.())!i,1:lLo,n 02-0027 Right Angle 02-00601 Right Angle 02-295 Right An~l~_ __ .. _____ ._._ .... S::>~_. ____ Yl..~>!} __ .. p._ . ______ ~J 3 Case Number . 1'ype ()r()JJi~iQg_ 03-271 Sideswipe 03-283 Right Angle 03-619 Right Angle . 03-636 Right Angle 03-715C Sideswipe 59 110 03-927 Ri.!~ht A~g_!~ ...... _ ..... ___ . __ 6 10 Totals: Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 W->N W->E W->E S->N W->E W->E W->E S->N S->N W->E W->N S->N Totals: Totals: 0 o 1 2 0 6 Num Num Hit & Tot Fat II)L XP,Q_ .. J~gQ ____ V~h_ P 2i 2' P 2! P 21 3 2! I ..P ______________ .. 1..: o 4 4 0 12 5 7 o 19 N umber of Fatalities: Number ofInjuries: Number ofPDOs: o (0.00%) 26/38 (44.07% 33 (55.93% Page 5 { City of Renton Corridor Report 6/7/2004 Repott Period: 0110112001 to 12/3112003 Corridor: SECOND ST. S between SHATTUCK AVE S and WELLS AVE S Comment: For Chris Brown, 206-722-1910 Re: Merrill Gardens Center, Sr. Units SECOND ST. S at SHATTUCK AVE S Year: 2001 Date Collision Wed-4/18/200 1 Fri-8/241200 1 Fri-1119/2001 Wed-12/5/2001 Mon-12/17/2001 Time Of Collision 09:26AM 05:40 PM 06:45 PM 12:32 PM 01:00 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Date Time Of Collision i Mon-9116/2002 i Thu-10/3112002 1,_ ............ _ . . Collision 05:30 PM 09:22 AM . Yearly Totals: Number ofCollisio Year: 2003 Date Time Of Collision Collision Sat-3/8/2003 07:16 PM i. _. .W ed-7/9/2003 01:25 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio . Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number Tyge of C,<>IJis. i9.11 Y~hJ ....... .Y~h 2 . 01-352 Sideswipe E->S E->W 01-756 Rear End E->S E->W 01-987 Sideswipe E->S E->W 01-1068 Sideswipe E->S E->W Fat .. fuLKI?_Q __ Run Veh 2 '-_·_-'---"2"1 2 2/ P ;1 o 1-11201 F:~~~~_ ()~~5~.~~~_e.<iXeJ!i~~ ___ .. ~~~§' ___ . ______ .... ___ _ ___ . __ ~ .. _._.1L ___ ._d 5 Totals: 0 5 2· 1 9 Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Nl.!l!1jJ_~r .T~e.()i£:ollisiou .. ___._ ... __ ._. __ y_e_h _1 __ . .Y~.~ .... f~L. __ fuLgQQ. ___ Ru.!! __ yei!.. 02-742C Sideswipe. E->W E->S P 2 ! 02-881 Right Ans.le . E->S E->W p ....... _ ... _ ._~J 2 Totals: 0 0 2 0 4 Case Direction N\!1}lb...flf. __ IY2e o(Qollision _ ..... ___ ... ___ .__Y~h..l...._yeIL~ 03-1941 Sideswipe 03-557C Rear End . .~. ---.. -_ .. 2 9 E->W E->W Totals: Totals: 0 Num Fat ... o 5 Num Hit& Tot .11J.1. J>.QQ._. __ Run ___ yel!, P 2i X __ .. . __ ._._ .... _~j o 2 0 4 6 1 17 SECOND ST. S at WHITWORTH AVE S Year: 2001 Date Time Of ! Collision Sun-3118/200 1 Mon-7/30/2001 Collision 12:05 PM 04:29 PM ' .. , . -. .... . -. . . . Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot NuIl11J_ef. .. .TXP~of GQllisiou_ .. _ .. ___ . __ .... _._. __ Yyh) . Y~h~_ .. _.fIlL._ .fuL .!)DQ__ Ru~_."'yy~ 01-0233 Sideswipe E->S E->W P 2 I 01-669 Right Angl~ _____ .E->S ......... ~:?'Y __ .... .. .. ~_ .. _ .}_i 2 Totals: 0 0 2 0 4 Case Direction Num Num Hit& Tot Page 1 Collision Wed-5122/2002 . Collision 07:00 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 Date Collision Thu-lII6/2003 Tue-2/1l12003 Sat-lll8/2003 Time Of Collision 01:45 PM 04:49 PM 11:19 AM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Number_ ))pe_ QfC~ni.s!Qn _________ .. ______ Y~h L Veh 2 02-4121 Sideswipe 1 Case NUl)1~t::T _TYl2t:: _Qr~Q.lJi~!~.!L 03-0038C Right Angle 03-0127 Sideswipe 03-948 Right A~gle 3 6 E->W E->W Totals: Direction Num Num Hit & Tot _____________ yeh L _____ Y_~h.1 ____ . .f~!. _ tl}L_~!29 ____ Ru!! __ "yeh_, E->W E->S 1 21 E->S E->W P 2 : E->S E->W 1 ________ ?:_1 Totals: 0 2 1 0 6 Totals: 0 2 4 o 12 SECOND ST. S, 20 ft. E of WHITWORTH AVE S Year: 2001 Date Collision Tue-7 /24/2001 Time Of Collision 05:27 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Number. Type of ColJi~i9_l}_ 01-650 Sideswipe 1 1 Direction Num Num Hit& Tot Veh 1 Veh2. Fat .!l1LP!?iL ___ ~l!!! ___ Y~h_, E->W E->W P i . _____ .. ________ ._ ..... ..1 Totals: 0 o 1 0 Totals: 0 o 1 o SECOND ST. S, 50 ft. E ofWIDTWORTH AVE S Year: 2001 Date Collision Sat-ll13/2001 Time Of Collision 05:12 PM , -. Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number _1'ype ofGQm~iQ!! __________________ Y~hL __ ,,~h ~ ____ E~J ___ InL_~!2Q ___ B.l!!! ____ y~_, _ 0 1-968_Sjdes~!p'~______ __________________ ..E-> W E-> W . _ .. _X~ _________ .J 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 1 Totals: 0 o 1 o MORRIS AVE S at SECOND ST. S Year: 2001 Date Collision Fri-lII9/200 1 Mon-3112/2001 Sat-6/9/2001 Thu-7112/2001 Tue-12/4/2001 Time Of Collision 03:05 PM 06:45 PM 03:15 PM 04:00PM 05:30PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Date Collision Mon-3/1ll2002 Tue-5/14/2002 Tue-9/3/2002 Wed-12/1812002 Time Of Collision 02:59 PM 03:34PM 02:29 PM 04:17 PM - Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number Type of <:;olli_~iol1 Veh 1 Veh 2 . Fat_ JllLJ~I)9 Run Veh 01-0055 Sideswipe E->S E->W P ------------21 01-0211 Right Angle E->S E-> W P 21 01-522 RightAngle E->S E->W P 21 01-6141 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle S->W P 11 o 1-1066 Fixe_d O~ie_ctJ1>~.!.k~_~_y eh~~ ______ ~:~S__ ______ _______ _ ____ _ ~ _____________ . ____ !._l 5 Case Number _Type of CQ.lli~i9.I1 . 02-199 Right Angle 02-388 Right Angle 02-710 Sideswipe 02-1075 .. _ Sides~ipe 4 Page 2 Totals: o o 5 0 8 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot _________ ._._.Ytl.h_~ Veh 2 ____ f[it ____ JllLI>I).9 ___ ~U_l} ___ yeh I E->W S->W P 31 E->S E->W -1 P 221' E->S E->W E->S E->W P 2 ! ••• __ • ___ ._ ••••• _._._._._~ _____ • ___ • __ ••• _,._. ____ • __ • ____ •. _._ •• __ "." •• _----______ 1 Totals: 0 1 3 0 -9 Year: 2003 Date Collision Fri-3/2112003 Time Of Collision 01:59 PM .-.-Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Number 1'ype ofCoJHsjgg 03-231 Sideswipe _ .. 1 10 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 _ Y~!J._~ ____ Fat __ JllL_J>PO __ J~u11 __ .Y.e.h, E->S E->~ ___________ ~ ___________________ 1.1 Totals: 0 2 0 0 2 Totals: 0 3 8 o 19 LOGAN AVE S at SECOND ST. S Year: 2001 Date Collision Thu-1I412001 W ed-1I311200 1 Tue-3/20/200 1 Mon-4/212001 Tue-4/1712001 Thu-6/71200 1 Sat-8/1112001 Mon-8/20/200 1 Wed-9/19/200 1 Thu-l0/18/2001 Time Of Collision 09:52 PM 02:00 PM 10:16 AM 06:24PM 05:39PM 08:55 AM 04:39PM 09:01 AM 11:42 AM 05:00PM Yearly Totals: -Ntiniber of Couisio Year: 2002 Date Collision -Sat-212/2002 Mon-4/1512002 Fri-4/2612002 Sat -6/112002 Mon-6/17/2002 Sat-8/3/2002 Sun-8/1112002 Fri-9/1312002 Sun-9/22/2002 Wed-1O/16/2002 Time Of Collision - 02:30 PM 01:42PM 11:31 AM 09:25 AM 12:11 PM 09:06 PM 11:02 AM 12:35 PM 08:34 AM 05:01 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 Date Time Of Collision Tue-5/20/2003 Thu-7/10/2003 Fri-8/29/2003 Wed-9/1012003 _ _ _ Mon-l0/20/2Q03 Collision 04:17 PM 10:58 AM 07:00PM 03:07 PM 04:27 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case __ Numb.er __ Type of C()llis!9.!l. __ _ 01-0008 Sideswipe o 1-0087C Sideswipe 01-0244 Sideswipe 01-3021 Right Angle 01-347 Right Angle 01-512C Sideswipe 01-7161 Fixed ObjectlParked Vehicle 01-738 Sideswipe 01-819 Right Angle o 1-908 ~ght ~gle 10 Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 E->S E->W E->S N->W E->S E->W N->W E->S E->W N->S E->W E->S E->W E->W E->W E->S E->W S->N E->W Totals: Num Num Hit & Tot l~t ____ Jp.L PDQ ____ B!l!L __ Y~l1_. P 2' P 21 P 31 P H 2, P 21 P 21 P 11 21 21 P 3! _____________________ J o 2 8 1 21 Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot NU111,~_er _Typ~gJC()l!ision _______ Ve!!L __ .Y~11 ~ __ F:':lJ ___ IllLYDQ. ____ Run __ Veh~ 02-0096 Right Angle E->W N->S 1 2! 02-0300 Sideswipe E->S E->W P 2 _02-331 RightAngle E->W S->N 2 2 02-430 Right Angle E->W S->N 2 2 02-482 Right Angle -N->S E->W P 2 02-618 Sideswipe E->S E->W P H 2 02-645 Right Angle S->N E->W P 2 02-732 Right Angle E->W S->N " P 2 02-763 _Right Angle E->W S->N P 21 02-844 _1~igIit~n~l~ _____________________ E->S ____ E:>W _____________ 1_ _ _____________ ~ 10 Totals: 0 6 6 1 20 Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number Type ofCol!L~()I1_ 03-410 Right Angle 03-559 Sideswipe Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat _ _ .1I1L J?Q.9_._ _fum ___ .Y~11_, E->S E~>S 03-712 RightAngle E->W 03~ 753 Right Angle E->S 03~880 ___ Sides_\Vip.e _____ . _________________ . _______ ~::>S 5 25 S->N E->W N->S E->W "E->W Totals: o Totals: 0 10 2 2 18 P 2i 21 21 21 2i P P P 4 o 2 __ .. _._._~_J 10 51 SECOND ST. S, 15 ft. E of LOGAN AVE S Year: 2003 Page 3 Date Collision Fri-6/2712003 Time Of Collision 10:18 PM Yearly Totals: Nuinber of Coliisio . Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction .. Nul!l!?~r-IYI?e i>KGQJlisio~ _________________ Y~J~_L___ Y~h_~ 03-528 Sides~ip'e . ___ J~:?:W __ ~-?:~ .. _ 1 Totals: 1 Totals: 0 Num Num Hit & Tot Fat_J~L_ JlQQ ___ ..Rl,l!L.._Y~1 P i ••• _. • •• _ .• _ .... ___ •• _. ___ • __ • _________ . __ .• _.1 o 0 1 0 o 1 o SECOND ST. S, 20 ft. E of LOGAN AVE S Year: 2002 Date Collision Mon-2/1112002 Time Of Collision 06:32 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case ... Number __ Type of C()l1i~()~ __ 02-0125 Sideswipe 1 1 Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 E->W E->W Totals: Totals: 0 Num Num Fat Ip.i PDO 1 o 1 o 1 o Hit & Tot Run Veh o o I . I SECOND ST. S, 100 ft. E of LOGAN AVE S Year: 2001 Date Collision Fri-3/30/200 1 Time Of Collision 01:00 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio' Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot ... b~_6~~~--~;~~i~!~.OlliSiO~. ___ :=~~-==~==~~=~_~_~~~.1=--.... ~;~_ .. -_=~at._~_-_l~j-~~~ ---=~:~. ___ ~~~J 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 1 Totals: 0 o 1 o BURNETT AVE S, 30 ft. WofSECOND ST. S Year: 2001 Date Collision Sun-lI118/200 1 Time Of Collision 06:54 AM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio . Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Number Type ofGgJlisi<>-I! __ . ____ ~ _______ y~llL __ Veh 2 ._ .... 01-1012 _~ides~jpe ... _____________________ ~·:::>S E-> W 1 Totals: 1 Totals: 0 Num Num Hit & Tot Fat .. _J!1L.RRQ ___ fuIn Veh_ 1 P_________ ._.1 o 0 1 0 o 1 o SECOND ·ST. S, 20 ft. W of BURNETT AVE S Year: 2001 Date Collision Sat-8/25/200 1 Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision _Number _'Type ofGoq~ion ____________ . ______ .ye.h L __ . Veh. ~ ___ .EllL_ InL PDQ_R~..Y eh] 05:25PM. 01-760_Sides~~p~ _______ .. ______ ' ____________ .}~~:>W ____ I!:->W _ .. _.__ .. ___ I> ____ . ____ _ Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 Link Totals: Number of CoUisio 1 BURNETT AVE S at SECOND ST. S Year: 2001 Date Collision Sat-5/261200 1 Time Of Collision 09:10AM Case Number _Type of GI?IE~iQ_n_ 01-474 Right Angle Page 4 Totals: 0 o 1 o Direction Num Num Hit & Tot __________ Veh 1 Veh 2 ... _ .. Xllt. __ .lnlJ)Q.Q ____ Kup_~Y~~ E->W N->S P 21 .. _ ....... ___ ._ . ____ ...1 Mon-6/4/2001 Mon-91 I 0/200 I Wed-12/1 9/200 I 06:50AM 10:19 AM 12:48 PM . Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Date Time Of Collision Collision Mon-12/912002 07:04 PM .. Yearly Totals: Number of Coliisio Year: 2003 Date Collision Thu-1/30/2003 Tue-3/18/2003 Sat-I 21 13/2003 Time Of Collision 04:58 PM 05:17 PM 04:33 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio 01-504 Sideswipe-···-······_·-·-···--·····E:;N·· -E->W'" ...... ·-·.··.·.·li· ........ -.----2-11 01-797 RightAngle S->N E->W I 2 o 1-1124Rig~tAIlgle_ .. ___ .... __ ... _.._~.:~W ........ ~~ ............................ L ........ _. __ ... .. __ .... _ . .?J 4 Totals: 0 2 2 0 8 Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot ~;-7~~i ·J~:~fp~Qlli~i~~~ .... _ .•.. ~~~ .. ~~~~.:~=~~~~ ..... ~~~=: ... ~.~~~~: ... :.~~j=-:f~~=·::_~~~~=·=~=ll 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Case Number IY"pe()fC:()J!i.si()!1.... .... 03-00851 Sideswipe 03-217 Sideswipe 03-10861 Rear End 3 8 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot .... Y~h! Y~hL.. .F~t . !!1L)?QQ. ..... B..!:1!1_._S~l!.1 E->S E->W P H 2' P 21 E->W E->W I E->S E->W ~... ~j Totals: 0 0 3 1 6 Totals: 0 2 6 1 16 SECOND ST. S at WILLIAMS AVE S Year: 2001 Date Collision Sat-I 120/200 I Sun-3118/200 1 Thu-5/17/2001 Sat-6/2/200 1 W ed-l 0/24/200 1 Thu-l1 /8/200 1 Sun-12/23/200 1 Time Of Collision 04:51 PM 09:33 PM 01:35 PM 10:45 AM 12:00 AM 07:00 PM 12:53 PM ---- Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Case Direction Number .TYIJ.e oJ <::911isi.9!!_.. ...... .......... _._ Yt:.Q L. Veh 2 01-0058 Right Angle 01-02381 Rear End 01-446 Right Angle N->S E->W E->W 01-492C Right Angle E->W E->W E->W N->S N->S 01-9351 Right Angle E->W N->S 01-982C Sideswipe N->W E->W 01-1136 R!g~tAl1.gle. . ..... _ ..... E.:>W.~~?~ ... 7 Totals: D~ TI~ill C~ D~~oo Collision Collision ._. NUlllber .. .Typ.e. of Qollision .... _ ....... _ .... ____ ._ ye4. L .... Y ~h 2 . Wed-1I23/2002 12:47 PM 02-0062 Right Angle E->W N->S Tue-4/2/2002 02:05 PM 02-263 Right Angle E->W N->S Wed-5/8/2002 01:36PM 02-369 RightAngle E->W N->S Tue-6/1112002 06:21 PM 02-465 Right Angle N->S E->W Mon-7/1I2002 09:26 AM 02-518 Right Angle E->W N->S Tue-9/3/2002 10:03 AM 02-7091 RightAngle E->S N->S Sat-9/1412002 09:16AM 02-737 RightAngle E->W N->S Num Num Hit & Tot Fat .. .l!1L_W.Q._ ... ~.ll!1_ .. 'yeh 1 P 21· P H 2 2' P 21 P 21 P 21 1 21 .... __ ~ .. _._._---_ .... __ -2 . o 2 5 1 14 Num Num Hit & Tot Fat J!.lL .fQ~._'_~~_..Y'~~"1 P 4! 2 1 P P ! 2: 31 21 2' 21 Tue-1O/15/29.Q2. .. 10:07 AM ... 02-841.~ghtAt!8.I.e_ ... _ .. __ ._ .. __ ... ___ E:?:.W .. ~.-?§. .. _ ... 1 2 6 21 ._--_ ..•... _:_ .. _ .. --~ Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 8 Totals: 0 4 0 19 Link Totals: Number of Collisio 15 Totals: 0 8 9 1 33 SECOND ST. S, 20 ft. E of WILLIAMS AVE S Year: 2003 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit& Tot Page 5 Collision Collision Sat-6/7/2003 08:49 AM Yearly Totals: Number of Coilisio . Link Totals: Number of Collisio Numbl:lr _TypeofC911isiQ.I!_. 03-459 Rear End 1 1 .+"*-~ ...... _. -_.-Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat . .1!1i _fQQ_. __ J~-l'n ____ Y~.h_, E->W E->'Y_____ __~_____ ..... ! Totals: 0 0 1 0 Totals: 0 o 1 o . SECOND ST. S, 25 ft. W of WELLS AVE S Year: 2002 Date . Collision Mon-5/20/2002 Time Of Collision 03:35 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number T)'pe ofG2!1i~t9B .... _________ Y~l1 L _ Ve!1_.~ __ l'~_ .. __ I!1L)~P9. ___ ._~.!!~_Y~h, 02-408C]lightAn.gle ____ .. ________________ S~?W E->W .. ______ J> ___ . _______ . ___ . .! 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 1 Totals: 0 o 1 o . SECOND ST. S at WELLS AVE S Year: 2001 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Mon-1I15/2001 04:10 PM Sun-2/4/2001 01:07 PM Fri-2/9/200 1 04:50 PM Mon-2/12/2001 12:01 PM ~~~~~~~~;:t ~~i~lislon---------------~:~ ---. r~~J ___ F~L __ J!lL_J>J2~-___ R!!!1 ___ Y e~l . 01-0102 RightAngle E->W S->N P 2! 01-0119 Right Angle E->W S->N P 21 01-0128 Rear End S->N S->N P' 2 ! W ed-7 /25/2001 11:39 AM Fri-8/1 0/200 1 09:00AM Fri-l0/5/2001 11:50 AM 01-652 RightAngle E->W S->N P 2: 01-705 RightAngle E->W S->N 2 2: 01-877 Right Angle E->W S->N P 2! Tue-l 0/23/2001 11:55 AM Fri-12i28/200 1 02:13 PM Fri-12/28/200 1 07:10 PM . -.. --..... -. . ....... _... _ ... "'--- 01-929 Right Angle E->W S->N P 2 i 01-1155 Right Angle E->W S->N 21 01-1156 RjghtAl!gle ____________ E:>W ____ S-?!'i___ P ____ .. ______ ~I Yearly Totals: Number ofCollisio 10 Totals: 0 3 8 0 20 ' Year: 2002 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number . Type _2f .<:::2.llision ________________ yehJ_ __ Y~_h_~ _____ J;:~L __ fuL1Q_Q... __ Rl!!!.._Y~h_, Mon-1I14/2002 12:33 PM Fri-1I18/2002 04:15 PM 02-0038 Right Angle E->W S->N 1 2 i } 02-0050 Right Angle E->W S->N P 21 Tue-3/5/2002 06:30 PM Thu-3/7/2002 02:22 PM Mon-3/25/2002 01:29 PM Wed-4/17/2002 07:11 AM Fri-5/3/2002 07:43 AM 02-179 Rear End S->N S->N P 2 i 02-182 Sideswipe E->W S->N 2 3 i 02-244 Right Angle S~>N E->W P 21 02-305 Right Angle S->N E->W 2 1 ' 02-350 Other E->N E->W P 2 I Thu-5/16/2002 05:45 AM Thu-5/23/2002 09:15 AM ,. W ed-8/7 /2002 09:24AM ;' , Thu-9/19/2002 02:18 PM Sat-9/2112002 10:43 AM 02-399 Right Angle E->W S->N 2 i 02-413A Right Angle E->W S->N 21 02-629 Right Angle E->W S->N P 21 02-750 Right Angle E->W S->N P 21 02-761 RightAngle S->N E->W P 2 i Sat-l 0/5/2002 06:09 PM Wed-l 116/2002 12:11 PM 02-818 RightAngle E->W S->N P 2 i 02-909 Right Angle S->N E->W 2 i Tue-l1112/2002 09:38 AM Tue-ll/26/2002 07:04PM Wed-12/18/2002 06:56 AM Wed-12/18/2002 12:12 PM 02-943 Right Angle E->W S->N P 21 02-988 Right Angle E->W S->N P 2 ' 02-1073 Right Angle E->W N->S 21 02-1074 Right Angle E->W S->N 2 21 Thu-12/19/2002 09:05 AM -.-" .. 02~1_076 _ Sides~ipe _________________ Fl,:_:>_W ____ §::?'N" ______________ .. _________ ~ ____________ ~J Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 19 Totals: 0 10 11 0 39 Page 6 Year: 2003 Date Collision Sat-6114/2003 Time Of Collision 08:40. PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit& Tot Number Type ofColl~~i9.p':_~~ _______ yeh) Veh 2 03-480 Right An~le ________ _ E->W S->N Fat --In~ -}>~Q_:~~-=~===~~lJ I Totals: o 3 0 0 2 Link Totals: Number of Collisio 30 Totals: 0 16 19 o 61 Totals for Corridor Number of Collisions: Total Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number ofInjuries: Number ofPDOs: 112 209 o (0.00%) 34/47 (30.36% 78 (69.64% Page 7 City of Renton Corridor Report 617/2004 Report Period: 01/0112001 to 12/3112003 Corridor: BURNETT AVE S between FOURTH ST. S and CEDAR RIVER (Waterway) Comment: For Chris Brown, 206-722-1910 Re: Merrill Gardens Center, Sf. Units BURNETT AVE S at FOURTH ST. S Year: 2001 Date Collision Fri-6/29/200 1 . Mon-llli2/2001 Time Of Collision 06:10 PM 07:00PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2002 Case Number Type oJc;Ql1i~i()11 01-583 Right Angle Ol-~?lG_Bight Angle 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot _Y~hJ _._Y~~2 Fat!!:lL.l!?'Q .. _Ru_n __ Y~h S->N E->W P 2 i N->S W->E 1 2 I + ••••• ~ __ ._. __ ._. __ ••••• ____ ._ •• _ ••• ___ •• __ ._.+._~ ___ . '_"~_' __ " ___ "'_' ______ T ____ ~ Totals: 0 1 1 0 4 Date Collision Time Of Collision 04:45 PM Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot ... ,. -----."'" . Sun-ll117/2002 1 ___ •• ___ •• _. __ • *_ _ ____ . __ Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 Date Collision Thu-l1/13/2003 Wed-l 2/10/2003 Time Of Collision 03:11 PM 04:17 PM .... . .. -- Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Number Typ~()fG911~QI1 ___ . _______ . __ . __ ye1!L ___ Y~1l~ __ E~L __ QlLPD0 ----~.!!.1l..y~h. 02-963 Right Angle W ->E S->N P H 2 I i .-.---.... ---------------,------------------------. -Totals:--0 0 . . .. T------.------2 Case Number Iyp()_2..L<:::_olli.§i91!. 03-964 Right Angle 03-1 079 Appr_oa~~ I~rJ:l __ 2 5 Direction Num Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat S->N E->W N->E S->N Totals: 0 Totals: 0 3 Num Hit& Tot . !!:lLYAQ ___ R~!Lyehl 1 . 2: 1 21 ... _ .... _._ --_._----_ .. _._---______ 1 2 0 0 4 2 1 10 BURNETT AVE S, 750 ft. S of THIRD ST. S Year: 2001 Date Collision Thu-ll/29/2001 Time Of Collision ". -_ ... _-- 12:38 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot ._ N~~l,l~r _JYP(;)oLc;o!!i~i9n__ . __ . ___ .. _"yeh_L __ Y~j1.~ __ ._. E~L __ !!:lL_PDOp _.B-un_yeh_ 1 01-1 045 __ ~$?t. A~~~__ _ ____ . ______ .. _.__ _~~~S ___ ___~ ~?S .... ____ ._. ___ . _______ . ___ . __ .. _. ___ . ___ .. J 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 1 Totals: 0 o 1 o BURNETT AVE S at THIRD ST. S Year: 2001 Date . Collision Time Of Collision Case Number Type of Colli~i()l1_ Page 1 ) Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat ._ . I!lLY_QO __ . __ R1!I1---~hl ....... _ __ ... _._>-.. w •• ,.,. ___ • ___ • ___ ••• _.1 . ~~. - Mon-VI5/200I 03:45 PM OI-0043C Rear End Yearly Totals:' Number of Coliislo 1 Year: 2002 Date Time Of Collision Collision i' ..~at::ll/9/2Q92 _. 09:0~J>¥ Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 W->S W->S P ... _ .. _ ...... -.~ Totals: o o 1 Date Collision Thu-l/9/2003 Thu-4/IO/2003 Time Of Collision 12:20 PM 12:40 PM Case Direction Num Num Hit &. Tot NumJ?_er . IYQ~.Qf. ~_oJli.~Q.Il_·. 03-0026 Sideswipe _.Y~h.L.._yeh.1 .. _ .. _.£~t .!!?i ... fDQ __ ~~!!!!...-yehl W->N W->E P 2 ! 03-286 ·Rear End W->E W->E 1.. .. _.~j Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 2 Totals: 0 1 1 0 4 Link Totals: Number of Collisio 4 Totals: 0 BURNETT AVE S at SECOND ST. S Year: 2001 Date Time Of Case Direction Collision Collision Number. Typt: ()f GQm~tQIl.......... __ .. y.~!1 t Veh 2 Sat-5/26/200I 09:10 AM 01-474 RightAngle E->W N->S Mon-6/4/200I. 06:50 AM 01-504 Sideswipe E->N E->W Mon-9/l 0/200 1 10:19 AM 01-797 Right Angle S->N E->W I .. W ed-I2/l9/200 1 .L~~<l~ y~. 0 I-l}2.i._gi~!It .. ~.E,g1~_.___ . ___ .~_. ___ ... _ .. ~~?~. ___ ~~>:N._ .. _ Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio 4 Totals: Year: 2002 Num Fat o 1 3 o 8 Num Hit & Tot. Jp.j . ...PP9._ .Rl!~. __ Veh., P 2i P 2i 21 ...... __ .. ____ . __ .. _____ .... ~J 2 2 o 8 Date Collision Mon-I2/9/2002 Time Of Collision 07:04 PM Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot --._ .. Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Year: 2003 Date Collision Thu-1I30/2003 . Tue-3/I8/2003 Sat-I2/I3/2003 Time Of Collision 04:58 PM 05:17 PM 04:33 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio ~~-7~;; ··.~~:~1p~~!1i~i~~-_~. :· ... :~~~.=~_~~ .... ~~:SI ~:~_._ .•..... ~~t: .• ~: .. lIlj .... R~~~~:::~~~~=~~~~1 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Case Number .1'YJle ()r.~.QI1.i.s.tQn 03-00851 Sideswipe 03-217 Sideswipe 03-10861 Rear End 3 8 Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 E->S E->W E->W E->W E->S E->W ... -. -..... Totals: Totals: 0 Num Fat o 2 Num Hit& Tot . It:ti.:p'Q_Q_._Run_._ye4" P H 21 P 21 P 21 ~ _ .• __ --l o 3 1 6 6 1 16 BURNETT AVE S, 275 ft. N of SECOND ST. S Year: 2001 Date Collision Tue-I1I6/200 1 Time Of Collision 12:06 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Coilisio Case Direction NumberTypeofG()l1i&o.!! .... _ .. _ ... ~._ .. Y..~. L ..... V~.1l2 o I-978 __ .~ideswiRe. 1 Page 2 E->N S->N Totals: Num Num Hit & Tot Fat ... J~{.XQQ ___ J~!lp.""""'y eh"l .... ____ .~ _.. ._~~. _____ .. __ ._J o 1 0 0 Link Totals: Number of Collisio I 1 Totals: 0 1 o o BURNETT AVE S, 300 ft. N of SECOND ST. S Year: 2003 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot G()llis~()n Collision I Thu-6/5/2003 01:20 PM . Yearly Totals: Number of Collisio Number I~t'l QJG2m~iQIl,_ .. _·_._ .. _________ .. Y~hL_ .. Vep)_ 03-455Righ~J\ng~e... .. .... .. _._ .. }~:::>S N->S 1 Totals: Fat .!!1LY29 . __ .Rll.!! ___ yeh., P , ....... _ ..... _ .... .._._ ... _ .. ..J o o 1 o Link Totals: Number of Collisio 1 Totals: 0 o 1 o BURNETT AVE S, 273 ft. S of TOBIN ST. S Year: 2001· Date Collision Mon-7/30/2001 Time Of Collision 12:32 PM YearJy Totals: Number of Collisio Link Totals: Number of Collisio Totals for Corridor Number of Collisions: Total Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: . Number ofInjuries: Number of PDOs: Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Number Iype()f CQ!fu;i.9n __________ ._Yt'l.h.L. _Vt'll1 L_~l!L._ .. !!1.LXQQ._ .. j{U1L. __ Y~h.1 01-668 . Pedest~ia_n/c:y~li.~!!!1~~I"'_~d Bck 1 __ ..... __ . __ ._ .. _1 1 Totals: 0 1 0 0 21 34 1 o (0.00%) 8/8 (38.10% 13 (61.90% Page 3 Totals: 0 1 o o Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Appendix Table of Contents D ITE LUC 254, Assisted Living -Description D ITE LUC 254, Assisted Living -weekday traffic D ITE LUC 254, Assisted Living -Saturday . D ITE LUC 254, Assisted Living -Sunday D Parking Generation -Retirement Community, LUC 250 D Parking Study for the Clare Bridge Assisted Living Facility -12/31/98 D Accident Data, 2001 through 2003, full years·only ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 2nd Street east of Logan Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 2nd Street east of Burnett Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 2nd Street east of Williams Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 2nd Street east of Wells Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 3rd Street east of Logan Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 3rd Street east of Burnett Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 3rd Street east of Williams Avenue S. ~ Weekday Traffic Counts -South 3rd Street east of Wells Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 2nd Street @ Wells Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 2nd Street @ Williams Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 2nd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 3rd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 3rd Street @ Williams Avenue S. • Manual Counts -South 3rd Street @ Wells Avenue S. Levels of Service South 2nd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 2nd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 .with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project MG-CIP 1. MG~HIP 3. MG-PIP 5. MG-C2P 7. MG-H2P 9. MG-P2P 11. MG-C3P 13. MG-H3P 15. MG-P3P 17. Christopher Brown @ Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. 8eattle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 7'22-1910 fax (206) 7'22-1909 Levels of Service Continuation South 2nd Street @ Logan Avenue S: South 2nd Street @ Logan Avenue S. 'S'Outh 2nd Street @.Logan Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Wells Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Williams Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ William~ Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South 3rd Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Burnett Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Williams Avenue S. . . South Tobin Street @ Williams Avenue S. South Tobin Street @ Williams Avenue S. Site Driveway @ Burnett Avenue S. . Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project Current Volumes 2006 without Project 2006 with Project 2006 with Project MG-C4P 19. MG-H4P 21. MG-P4P 23. MG-C5P 25. MG-H5P 27. HG-P5P 29. HG-C6P 31. HG-H6P 33. HG-P6P 35. HG-C7P 37. HG-H7P 39. HG-P7P 4l. HG-C8P 42. HG-H8P 43. HG-P8P 44. HG-C9P 45. HG-H9P 46. HG-P9P 47. HG-P10P 48. Christopher Brown & Associates 9688 Rainier Ave. ~. &attle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 Fax (206) 722-1909 o __ ,i CITY·OF RENTON, WASHINGTON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING O,VISION AUTOMATIC COUNT LOG • TRAFFIC ~ NO. STATION NO • LOCATION: ~ TC __ A~e L1&)~12-~Q ~~ S -zvr.d ~r-l~ At/S • o' S c tld DIRECTION OF HOSr' A (1): (J\S UNIT BOX BAT It I 0 DO ru:. ~ COUNT TYPE: J II II --DIRECTION OF HOSE B (2): __ VOLTAGES' TASK DAY DATE TIME HOSES UNIT A /5' 5 BATT. A/S' 5 COUNT COMMENTS: PUTOUT '} . .3 13:'30 ~ COUNTER w~D V-ro CHECKED COUNTER · : · • · · · STOPPED Cf-s"" V ~ COUNT Yr,' 1:>:L.fo 1~c;,Dt ADDmONAl A\.U~T -:. \iOO \0 ::. qOO~ ,,~cl COMMENTS: 2- 1) I:IOSES: 3) A'S' S (AlB SWITCI:IES) . . A) Are hoses spanning roadway? Al Are wire conneCtiO~Olid? (DAI) '(t ~ tI\ B) Are nails and strings secure? BI Perform hose test. 0 C) Have hoses migrated? 4) CHECK ~QL TAGES 2) 1lNII A) Check /record battery voltage. (SENIORS) 0 A) Check connections. (DAI) B) Are air switch voltages greater than B) Is unit firmly strapped (or velcroed) down? (DAI) 4.9 V? (DAI) C) Are actuations being registered? , D) Check Interval setting? (DAI) El Is unit on/recording? .. -- CITY OF RENTON: TRANSPORTATION DIVISION, TRAFFIC COUNT SUMM LOCATION: S 2ND ST EtO BURNETT A V S TC#: 105 STA#: P 19060-50 03 ~~¥' ~ AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC ." "-" DATE: Jun-03 • AVERAGE HOURLY VOLUMES WKD WKD P P K BEGIN END EB 0 TOTAL EB 0 FACTOR 0 100 77 0 77 1.00 0.00 0.7 100 200 46 0 46 1.00 ·0.00 0.4 200 300 32 ,0 32 1.00 0.00 0.3 300 400 22 0 22 1.00 0.00 0.2 400 500 30 0 30 1.00 0.00 0.3 500 600 93 0 93 1.00 0.00 0.8 600 700 179 0 179 1.00 0.00 1.6 700 800 290 0 290 1.00 0.00 2.6 " ~~. 800 . 900 298 0 298 1.00 0.00 2.7 900 1000 488 0 488 1.00 0.00 4.4 1000 1100 586 0 586 1.00 0.00 5.3 1100 1200 711 0 711 1.00 0.00 6.4 1200 1300 777 0 777 1.00 0.00 7.0 1300 1400 766 0 766 1.00 0.00 6.9 1400 1500 837 0 837 1.00 0.00 7.6 1500 1600 978 0 978 1.00 0.00 8.8 1600 1700 1092 0 1092 1.00 0.00 9.9 lQ 1700 1800 1147 0 1147 1.00 0.00 10.4 " 1800 1900 817 0 817 1.00 0.00 7.4 1900 2000 566 0 566 1.00 0.00 5.1 2000 2100 422 0 422 1.00 0.00 3;8 2100 2200 355 0 355 1.00 0.00 3.2 2200 2300 274 0 274 1.00 0.00 2.5 2300 2400 173 0 173 1.00 0.00 1.6 TOTAL: 11053 0 11053 100 ANGSUM MARY: AM PM ENDHR ~OLUME ENDHR /VOLUME TOTAL 1200 711 1800 1147 EB 1200 711 1800 1147 0 100 0 1300 0 / CITY OF RENTON: TRANSPORTATION DIVISION, TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY LOCATION: S 2ND ST E/O WILLIAMS A V S 'fvJM TC#: 58 STA#: P 19060-60 03 AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC DATE: Mar-03 AVERAGE HOURLY VOLUMES WKD WKD P P K BEGIN END WB WB TOTAL WB WB FACTOR 0 100 39 0 39 1.00 0.00 0.4 100 200 32 0 32 1.00 0.00 0.3 200 300 19 0 19 1.00 0.00 0.2 300 400 31 0 31 1.00. 0.00 0.3 400 500 77 0 77 1.00 0.00 0.8 500 600 292 0 292 1.00 0.00 3.0 600 700 592 0 592 1.00 0.00 6.1 " 700 800 789 0 789 1.00 0.00 . 8.1 :,.",-, 800 900 613 0 613 1.00 0.00 6.3 900 1000 576 0 576 1.00 0.00 5.9 1000 1100 603 0 603 1.00 0.00 6.2 1100 1200 684 0 684 1.00 0.00 7.0 1200 1300 707 0 707 1.00 0.00 7.2 1300 1400 649 0 649 1.00 0.00 6.6 1400 1500 690 0 690 1.00 0.00 7.1 (.~) 1500 1600 , .. :' . 1600 1700 ...:.;. 680 0 680 1.00 0.00 7.0 655 0 655 1.00 0.00 6.7 1700 1800 607 0 607 1.00. 0.00 6.2 1800 1900 492 0 492 1.00 0.00 5.0 1900 2000 320 0 320 1.00 0.00 3.3 2000 2100 234 0 234 1.00 0.00 2.4 2100 2200 195 0 195 1.00 0.00 2.0 2200 2300 133 0 133 1.00 0.00 1.4 2300 2400 75 0 75 1.00 0.00 0.8 TOTAL: 9784 0 9784 100 WANG SUMMAR Y: AM PM END HR. VOLUME ENDHR VOLUME TOTAL 800 789 1300 707 WB 800 789 1300 707 WB 100 0 1300 0 ·il , \._J ~-.;' ',...,. '--'" . __ ..... CITY,OF RENTON, WASHINGTON I ,TRAFFIC ENGINEERING D~ISION I AUTOMATIC COUNT LOG , TRAFFIC w,urg NO. . STATION NO. LOCATION: e TC _ k_ AC; e t ~ ~'(J-l Q t!}o ~ ZntJ -S, h We;1/~ AV .:5 i , " s c dd UNIT BOX BAT COUNT TYPE: II I I II II 0 DO DIRECTION OF HOSE A (1) : ~ I 1TLf .-:L DIRECTION OF HOSE B (2): __ I -- VOLTAGES' TASK DAY DATE TIME HOSES UNIT A/S' 5 BATT. A/S' S COUNT COMMENTS: PUTOUT W~D ' 9-3 I "1!OO V ¢ COUNTER 'l./ CHECKED Ft-,. COUNTER CJ-S--. l"f~oo X L_ H'f96 ~ "p · =l.&, .,:~S-V t1=-z. Redo ft¥/" -L..---: · • · . · · . STOPPED COUNT We-V "~JO IO:oS-V ~ I" ZC;-, ADDITIONAL \\c:),l.St{ ~ ~"1>O vfd COMMENTS: A""bT': -'1-" 1) HOSESi 3) A~' S 'IAIB SWlTCI::IES} f-~t'I A) Are hoses spanning roadway? A) Are wire connections solid? (DAI) B) Are nails and strings secure? B) Perform hose test. C) Have hoses migrated? 4) CHECK ~LIAGES 2) l.lNlI A) Check !record battery voltage. (SENIORS) A) Check connections. (DAI) B) Are air switch voltages greater than ' B) Is unit firmly strapped (or velcroed) down? (DAI) 4.9 V? (DAI) ~ C) Are actuations being registered? .. D) Check interval setting? (DAI) - E) Is unit on/recording? .\"~... I .. '"-''' --,,' CITY·OF RENTON, WASHINGTON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING O,VISION AUTOMATIC COUNT LOG TRAFFIC COUNT NO. STATION NO. LOCATION: 3teJ._ % TC 4~4-A9. e 1..:.!. t }<l -!:U2 ~:> 5 Sf" Lcx;:J{ 6A'\ AVS • o' S c tld DIREci'1ON OF HOSE A (1): fi. UNIT BOX BAT It I 0 DD • .1fr ..£ COUNT TYPE: I II II DIRECTION OF HOSE B (2): __ I --I VOLTAGES TASK DAY DATE TIME HOSES UNIT A!S' S BATT. A!S' S COUNT· COMMENTS: PUTOUT rz5 COUNTER WED q,,] 1.l2.0 V .~ CHECKED ./ COUNTER · : · · · · · STOPPED Fr; ~. ~ ~ .. COUNT &(.~ f~:)o "2.~7'~ ADDITIONAL 13.,."'3 \ \,8&\ Vfo\ P\\..U~T ~ 2-~ COMMENTS: .. 1) I::IOSES: 3) A~' S[AIB SW~I::IES) A) Are hoses spanning roadway? A) Are wire connections solid? (DAI) . ~ ti' B) Are nails and strings secure? B) Perform hose test. ~ C) Have hoses migrated? 4) ~I:fEkK ~LIAGES 2) UNII A) Check !record battery voltage. (SENIORS) A) Check connections. (DAI) B) Are air switch voltages greater than B) Is unit firmly strapped (or velcroed) down? (DAI) 4.9 V? (DA\) , C) Are actuations being. registered? , D) Check Interval setting? (DAI). E) Is uniUln!rec~~d~gL . .: . ~ . . :~ ". CITY-OF RENTON, WASHINGTON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION AUTOMATIC COUNT-LOG TRAFFIC COUNT NO. STATION NO. LOCATION: S ara 'CST Tc3 ~~ AC; f \.0 J.t»Q-~Q. ~ ~ e 10 $ L,Ut, "''en I\\JS ---(J) s c DIRECTION OF HOSE A (1):~ UNIT BOX BAT II dd 0 DO 'Itt -L COUNT TYPE: I II II DIRECTION OF HOSE B (2): __ -- VOLTAGES TASK DAY DATE TIME HOSES UNIT A/S' S BATT. A/S' S COUNT COMMENTS: PUTOUT tnt)~ 1/\,. It) 3 ./ -,/ 0'" COUNTER US\ CHECKED COUNTER · : · • · • · STOPPED L()e\) ?>!z..D{0:3 \33D ' 2.D~5~ COUNT , ADDmONAL 2..O~-S~ COMMENTS: AWi:)l" ':: -z.. ': lO.41.q vt'd 1), HOSES: 3) AlS' S IAIB SWITCHES) A) Are hoses spanning roadway? A) Are wire connections solid? (DAI) , "" B) Are nails and strings secure? B) , Perform hose test. ~..rf C) Have hoses migrated? 4) CHECK )lOLIAGES 2) 1lN.II A) Check /record battery voltage. (SENIORS) A) Check connections. (DAI) B) Are air switch voltages greater than B) Is unit firmly strapped (or velcroed) down? (DAI) 4.9 V? (DAI) C) ,Are actuations being registered? D) Check interval setting? (DAI) E) Is unit on/recording? . TRAFFIC COUNT NO. STATION NO. " .. ~/" -'0_._,;" CITY·OF RENTON, WASHINGTON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING OtvlSION AUTOMATIC COUNT LOG " .... _ .. ,,/ . w ll .. LlSJ'YlS LOCATION: S 3(U <aT e I~ LU6bLS-f\\),~ TC~~3 AC ~ !-0 1:-~Q • IO .D ~ UNIT ::r:l± BOX ~ BAT c II COUNT TYPE: II' I~· \1) Ii TASK DAY DATE TIME PUTOUT COUNTER we§> ~120103 l33i CHECKED COUNTER • STOPPED I COUNT ftt.\ I ~ 11.1.1o~· \0 ?,S AOOmONAL COMMENTS: 1) 2) HOSES; A) Are hoses spanning roadway? BI Are nails and strings secure? C) Have hoses migrated? 1lliII AI Check connections. (DAI) HOSES ../ BI Is unit firmly strapped (or velcroed) down? (DAI) C) Are actuations being registered? 01 Check interval setting? (OAII E) Is unit on/recording? UNIT A/5' 5 / tld o DO DIRECTION OF HOSE A (1): ~ DIRECTION OF HOSE B (21: VOLTAGES' BATT. I A/ S' 5 COUNT· COMMENTS: c) l'l,~ 0 ~ Awt)'t:. J.~'4?1 .. :: 'f) ~ v~ 3) AIS' S "(AIR SWITCHES) _ A) Are wire connections solid? (OAI) '.;rJ~ B) Perform hose test. ~ 4) CHECK VOLTAGES A) Check Irecord battery voltage. (SENIORS) B) Are air switch voltages greater than 4.9 V? (OAI) CITY OF RENTON: TRANSPORTATION DIVISION, TRAFFIC COUNT SUMM LOCATION: S 3RO ST E/O WELLS AV S TC#: 48 ST A#: P 20230-70 AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC DATE: Apr-04 A VERAGE HOURLY VOLUMES WKD WKD P P K BEGIN END EB WB TOTAL EB WB FACTOR 0 100 72 0 72 1.00 0.00 0.8 100 200 48 0 48 1.00 0.00 0.5 200 300 33 0 33 1.00 0.00 0.4 300 400 21 0 21 1.00 0.00 . 0.2 400 500 25 0 25 1.00 0.00 0.3 500 ·600 81 0 81 1.00 0.00 0.9 600 700 157 0 157 1.00 0.00 1.8 700 800 259 0 259 1.00 0.00 3.0 ,. -:,,\t 800 900 337 0 337 1.00 0.00 3.9 900 1000 389 0 389 1.00 0.00 4.5 1000 1100 . 414 0 414 1.00 0.00 4.8 1100 1200 532 0 532 1.00 0.00 6.1 1200 1300 . 565 0 565 1.00 0.00 6.~ 1300 1400 572 0 572 1.00 0.00 6.6 1400 1500 663 0 663 1.00 0.00 7.6 .'.'.J 1500 1600 693 C:··· 1600 1700 784 ~ .. " 1700 1800 763 0 693 1.00 ·0 784 1.00 0 763 1.00 0.00 8.0 0.00 9.0 0.00 8.8 1800 1900 653 0 653 1.00 0.00 7.5 1900 2000 481 0 481 1.00 0.00 5.5 2000 2100 402 0 402 1.00 0.00 4.6 2100 2200 341 0 341 1.00 0.00 3.9 2200 2300 246 0 246 1.00 0.00 2.8 2300 2400 142 0 142 1.00 0.00 1.6 TOTAL: 8671 0 8671 100 ANGSUMMAR Y: AM PM ENDHR VOLUME ENDHR VOLUME TOTAL 1200 532 1700 784 EB 1200 532 1700 784 WB 100 0 1300 0 Weather : CLOUDY Count ed by:LMC n~ard # :D4-1029 ,I-face :DRY IWELLS AV 5 ISouthbound Start I TillE i Left Thr'u I Richt Cit Y of Rent on Transportation SystPtS Division Traffic Operations 2004 St.udies CARS/PEDESTRiANSr:-lEAVY VEHICLES IS 2ND 5T IWELLS AV S IWe,tbound I Other! Left. Tnrl.! Rioht !Nwthbound Oth~rl Left Thru IS 2ND ST I East DC)l.lTId I Right. Other·l left Peak HOllr Analysis By Entire Intersectionfot, thl' Period: 15:00 on 04/15/04 to 16:45 (In 04/15/0.1, Tille ! 15:00 I 15:00 I 15:00 I 15:00 Vol. 0 0 0 13! 0 779 31 71 144 126 0 131 0 Pct. 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.01 13.0 95.3 3. 7 0.BI ~10.B 44.5 0.0 4.51 0.0 Total 13 I B17 1 2B3 I. b High 15:45 I 15: 15 I 15: 15 I 15:15 Vol. 0 0 0 51 0 206 10 41 45 37 71 0 Total <= 220 I 89 ':I ~. 1- PHF 1 0.650 '1 0.928 1 0.795 0.750 ~CARS/PEDESTRIANS # WELLS f':lV S I ~* AHEAVY VEHICLES ~ 13#~ 01~ 01~ 1211 31 # A #A I2IIA 01A 1211 1;:::6 :J:I: =====#=====1=====1=====1 1. ~57 # . 13 # 121 121 1 121 I 14= :H 1 :J:I: *" Inbound 13 # Thru 0 0.0 0 Study Naae: TMC048P Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 04/15/04 Page IIntvl. Right Othl'rl._Total I I 0 61 0.0 100.01 13 21 '" "1 ..... 7 ####################### IOutbound l57 17121 ####################¥# S 2ND ST Total ",. ;;'::9 77t:; 923 1 L~4 ====================== ..... 121 o In bOI.lnd -------------Outbound '" 0 Total 121 ..... IZ1 ", ...... 121 #######u############### '\.. 6 # ....• :j:~ # :f:t 4=1: *f Inl:JOund Outbound Total ..... 2 3 1 '" 739 ..... 779 817------------- 121 '" 121 817 .. ', =============~======= J .... : :::H) U ,', c:I :;::: El2; E: a·U) ~; T Outbound 121 ##########ft#######*,#~# Totel 283 # ,~ 1411'" 1241~ 0#~ 13 IA 31A 21A 0#A 0 I=====I=====I~====#===== J 11.1.1+ l ;:~6' !:?\ ~* t :? /1\ / ! \ I H l"IFI_LF; ~l'v' S I 1\1('))"':[;1"1 I " ".';~ Weather : SUNNY I"l)unted by;LMC '1rd # :D4-1028 5\\t'f ace : DRY iWILLH1~iS iW ::, ISc,ut.hbound St.3l't I Ci t Y of Renton Tl'anspot'tation Systells Division Traffic Operations 2004 St.udies CARS/PEDESTRiANS,hEAVY VEhICLES IS 2ND ST IW;LLIA~lS AV :; !Westbound i Nor·thboul)d IS2~D 8T I Ea;tbC'lInd ! St.udy NaJe: H1C049P Site Codp : 00000000 St.a·rt Date: 04/22/04 Page ! 2 11 nt v 1. Tille I Left Thr'u Right Cth~t'I left. Thru RiQht Other': left ThrlJ Right Other: Left Thl''.i Ri.Q~lt Other: Tota] Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 on 04/22/04 to Tille I 15: 15 I ft", il:'" J. • .f'J ... 1 15: i5 Vol. 0 171 64 191 . 1&9 6&7 0 71 0 Pd. 0.0 67.3 25.1 7.4! 20.0 79.1 0.0 0.8! 0.0 TotaJ 254 I 843 I 33 High 15:45 16:00 I 15: 15 Vo :. 0 44 18 51 45 179 0 01 0 Total 67 224 12 PHF 0,948 0.9/11 I 0.b3£' ; ~CARS/PEDESTRIANS AHEAVY VEHICLES' ~ *~ t-JIi...L.J.AttlS ~4\.J \3 10#~ 571~ 1691~ 01 ..... *1:····· '7 I····· i~: ,...... ell =====#~====I=====:=====I 1 (3 ~* f,Lf I :i. 7:l 0 I # :J:I' ####################### S 2ND ST =======~===~========== Inbound -------------Outbound ..... Ii:' ##########~#u~#######n# ,.... :I. ~::: *1: 1-::· '-. Int.:1ound I (hI'!:: bo '..Inc:! Tot;.:d I pt)D'.',)";ci (] IJ t b () U. r', d Total i:~;::!if 121 ;:~!5'+ H:., _'j' .,;~ \-...• , ... ,, 0 0.0 0 16:4:c {H"; 04!22/~i4 1 15: 1~1 0 331 (1 0 0 ~ .~ .. 1C.! 0.0 100.01 O,0 0.0 0.0 lOIll.0i I 12 I 15:45 0 121 0 0 0 41 4 I , 0.750 # # :\:1: # ~* '" "? # ..... 7 :f" ###################### , .. ~ .,", ..... 37 Inbound D!.l t b (j 1 .. \ n d Tot""l 843-------------o ",. 1I:,"? .::' 1... :::: ::: ::: ::.~: :::: :=: :.:::-: :.:;:; ~:'.: :::;:::: =:::-;.;::: :.:= ; :;: ~: .. :::.;::: ::::: ::::;: !;::: ::-.:: :1* ;1* ~* ;j ~ :H ~:f # *1 :j:~ 'i:i: ~:!; :fl· *~ :f:F :j:~ :~i :!:/: :~j: ~± *1: .. f:!: :j'i' ~* ... -. .I.,:" .. ..... 1"7 '1 l.l ,." 01 '" ~~ I r" 04'" ~:!~* ..... ! .... li~ ~. .... :/1 ..... . .:.~: ::::: ::~ :;:.:::;-.; Ii.) *1; :j:j: l-.I J L L .. I f·WI ~J n \! Ei It) :1* •. ~. ,~. :It fl: / I \ . ! \ \, :~ .. ~ Weather : OVERCAST Counted by:JWS Board' :04-1027 lurface : WET City of Renton Transportation Systels Diyision Traffic Operations 2003 Studies i CARS/PEDESRTIANS,HEAVY VEHIClES I BURRNETT AV S I S 2ND ST I BURRNETT AV S IS 2ND Sr I Southbound IWestbound I Northbound IEastbound Start I I I I Tile 1 left Thru Right Otherl left Thru Right other I left Thru Right otherl left Peak Hour Analysis·By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 on 03/05/03 to 16:45 on 03/05/03 Tile 1 16:00 1 16:00 I 16:00 1 16:00 Vol. I 0 66 79 161 37 605 64 291 112 n 0 61 0 Pct. I 0.0 40.9 49.0 9.9/. 5.0 82.3 8.7 3.9/ 57.4 39.4 0.0 3.01 0.0 Total I 161 / 735 I 195 I 4 High / 16:15 / 16:45 / 16:30 I 16:45 Vol. I 0 22 29 31 6 166 . 13 81 29 23 " 21 0 Total I 54 / 193 I 54 I, 2 PHF I 0.745 I 0.952 / 0.903 I 0.500 64 77 141 Study Hale: OC050P Site Code : ~ Start Date: 03/05/03 Page : 2 IIntYI. Thru Right Otherl Total 1 1 0 0 41 0.0 0.0 100.01 I 1 0 0 21 I I ..... 29 .'" 5 64 '" 5&3 ..... 42 605 " Inbound Outbound Total 735-------------- o '" 26 o ...... 4 ...•. o o 4· Inbound 195 OLlt bo lind 103 Total 298 66 '" 111 '" 74 '" 37 A 1 A 3 A o o -, 6 o ----------===== ===== ===== ==== 103 112 77 0 6 .BURRNETT A S 735'''' 11 37 S 2ND ST ----- /1\ / I \ I North 1 " .. ~.~ City of Renton Wl!ather :PARTLY CLOUDY Transportation Systels Division Study Nale: TMC058P ):'~nted by:JWS Traffic Operations Site Code : 00000000 .flJ 41 :T-0919 2003 Studies start Date: 02/18/03 Surface :DRY Page : 2 CARS/~STRIANS,HEAVY VEHICLES I BURNETT AV S IS 3RD ST I BURNETT AV S IS 3RD S1 ISouthbound IWestbound INorthbound IEastbound Start I I I I IIntvl. Tile I Left Thru Right Other I Left Thru Right otherl Left Thru Right oth!rl Lef~ Thru Right Other I Total Peak Hour" Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 on 02/18/03 to 16:45 on 02/18/03 I Tile I 16:00 I 16:00 I 16:00 I 16:00 I Vol. I 44 64 0 431 0 0 0 '361 0 95 70 561 90 932 87 151 Pct. I 29.1 42.3 0.0 28.41 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.01 0.0 42.9 31.6 25.31 8.0 82.9 7.7 1.31 Total I 151 I 36 I 221 I 1124 I High I 16:00 I 16:45 I 16:00 I 16:45 I Vol. I 13 24 0 121 0 0 0 121 0 30 24 201 20 257 18 01 " Total I 49 I 12 I 74 I 295 I :\\~ PHF I 0.n0 10.750 10.747 I 0.953 I ~CARS/PEDESTRIANS BURNETT AV S ..... HEAVy VEHICLES '" 43 0 '" 64 '" 29 95 A-0 .A-0 A 15 90 ===== ==== ===== ===== ===== 43 0 64 44 185 '" 36 " .. ;) , ..... 36 ) Inbound 51 " .. Outbound 185 Total 336 ." 121 0 '" 121 '" 82 ..... 121 121 9121 A-8 Inbound 1124 Inbound 36 Outbound 0 Out bound 112146 '" 121 '" 920 Total 1124 Total 1082 .', 121 0 932 ... , 12 7121 '" 85 932 112146 87 ..... 2 44 Inbound 221 S 3RD ST Outbound 151 '" 15 Total 372 15 .', 87 '" 121 '" 95 '" 7121 56 64 ... , 121 ... , 121 A 121 ". 121 11\ 151 ===== ===== ===== ==== 1 I \ o 95 7121 56 North I Weather : SUNNY _Count ed by: LMC ~rd # :D4-102B tim-·f acl' : DRY 1 WILLIA~lS AU S City of Renton Transportation Syste.s Division Tt'affic Operat ions 2004 Studies CARS/PEDESTRIANS! HEAVY VEHICL_ES 1 S 3RD ST IWILLIANS Ali S IS 3RD ST iSouthbound ' iWestbc.und INorthbotmd IEastbound ~aM 1 1 1 , __ ~_~-'-_.1tft. ThrlJ RiQht Other'! Left Thru RiQht Otherl Left Thrll Right Other! Left Peak Hour Analysis By Entit'e Intersection for the Pedod: 15:00 on 04/29/04 to 16:45 on 04/29/04 Tille J 15: 15 1~.: 15 1 15: 15 , 15: 1::, Vol. 57 2% 0 261 0 0 0 131 0 . 0 0 371 0 Pct. 15.0 78.1 0.0 &.BI 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.01 0.0 Total 379 I 13 37 I 1054 High 15:15 15:30 1 15:15 I 1&:00 Vol. 13 82 0 101 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 121 0 Total 105 PHF 0.902 ~CARS/PEDESTRIANS '~'HEAVY VEHICLES (, 12 1 284 0.542 10.771 1 0.928 :J:t \.oJI LL I AlVIS AI) S ~ 26#~ 01~ 2881~ 541 A #~ 01A alA 31 ====~#=====I=====I=====I 29(; I ~)7 I Inbound # # :J:I: # # # *~ Study_ Nale: TMC059P Site Code: 00000000 Start Date: 04/29/04 Page : 2 IIntvl. Thru Right Otherl Total 909 124 211 &6.2 11. 7 1. 91 1 1 247 28 91 -" 13 ..... 1.2: i:~6 # :J:I: :J:r. ####:J:I:################## S 3RD 8T I OIJt bound Total #####:J:I:################ '" 0 ==================~=== ..... Inbound -------~-----Outbound ",. E\72 Tot i::\ 1 •.... 37 l ####################### ",. (:~ j :!:l: ..... *1: l0ti4 121 1 iI~~5L~ Inbc)lJnd Outbound Ti)tr:~l ..... ..... o o :t. 3----------..:.--·----- 966 nJ Q'I ==========-========== 37 In bOl..l'pd Ol.lt bound Toti;:"} L~ i~:lzr 1-1.~.:.i7 ####################~# ~* I~ Q'l1~ 01~ 0#'" 37 IA 01A 01~ 0#A 0 /1\ 1=====1=====1=:===#===== , , , ,/ ! " ,~ i;;~ 41) ~+ ::~:;'/ ~* 1'-1<:) ,,.,,.t: h :1:1: ~~]: L..l_ J ~)1'r1S (.:j V t:\ H ",\) City of Renton ·~ther : SUNNY Transportation Systels Diyision Study Nale: TMC060P "J'unhd by: LMC Traffic Operations 'Site Code : 00000000 BOBl'd # :D4-1027 2004 Studies Start Date: 04/01/04 Surface :DRY Page : 2 . CARS/PEDESTRIANS, HEAVY VEHICLES IWELLS AV S IS 3RD ST IWELLS AV S IS 3RD ST I Southbound IWestbound I Northbound IEastbound Start I 1 I 1 IIntvl. Tille 1 Left Thru Right Otherl Left Tht'u Right Otherl Left Thru Right Otherl Left Thru Right Otherl Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 on 04/01/04 to 16:45 on 04/01/04 1 Tile I 1&:00 I 16:00 I 16:00 Vol. I 0 0 0 251 0 0 0 2&1 0 Pct. 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.01 0.0 Total 25 26 I 227 High 16:00 1&i45 I 16:00 Vol. 0 0 0 101 0 0 0 151 0 Total 10 1 15 I 59 PHF I 0.&25 1 0.433 1 0.962 ~CARS/PEDESTRIANS ~* WELLS AV S 1 AHEAVY VEHICLES ~ 25#~ 01~ 01~ 01 A #A 01A 01A 01 =====#~====I=====I=====I 25 # 0 1 0 I 0 I *~ 1 1 # Inbound ####################### IOutbound 8 3RD ST Total -------------------------------------------- 156 ~ 1.51 ..... "" ,.J Inbound 1098 -------------Outbound 0 ~ 889 Total 1,1219B 9;:;:~0 "". 31 ..... 1#####1############1### ~ 2;;: # Inbound Ol.lt bound Total '::Ie:-L ..... J 332 357 ;:::27 227 176 34 77.5 14.9 40 1.76 156 ===== 332 7 I 1&:00 I 171 15& 920 0 221 7.41' 14.2 83. 7 0.0 2.01 I 1098 I 16:30 121 39 238 0 61 I 283 I 1 0.970 .26 26 # #####1#1############## '" 0 ,,'" 0 0 Inbound Ol_lt bound Tot al 26----------·---- 954 '" 12) 980 ..... 0 121 =======~============= 34 9;;":::0 S 3FW ~3T 1##ltil#####II######### # ..... I'" 01~ 1741'" 34#'" 17 IA 01A 21A 0#A 0 /1\ 1=====1=====1=====#===== / I' \ o 1. 76 1 3'+:j;~ 17 # ~:j; WE:l...L.S {4V S I ~~ " :\';~ . TRAf flC VOLUME SUMMARY I r~oJe-cr #"1'"1'/// c;:c;.""~J1..J' OATE ::Jq/1t if) '()~ DAY thU INTilScCT ION OF: #'// II 4'~ ~ff f/c .C::::-AND .). 7'bJ/~ f"+~d: • 60-0 TIME £.{70 TO P = P!.AK HOUR " ...... ~ .. Ea s-+-b:::ur-,d· VVe.s+-b ~"1d Ncr-+l-}ec vr'\c Sc\...J~t:CVfJC! 15 T "ME • ",." .. I Lis I I Lis I I I L 5 I ·1 L 5 I rcfl: I I I I ~-415" b 0-I I 17/ 2-:?'? ~Jr-JQ> '2 " 1$ I 7/ #Jb_ f1,j ~ I .1.2-2-2/ -4'¥J-~ _t:t 0 :2'1 0 ~8· ? !lft>-175' /0 2 J'Jf ~ 5'0' S-/$'-sJ'b cr / I 7t J If'! J~-~'I5 ( 0 , ;;2-I JCI 5"1.5 .. ((jO :l 0 2'1 0 :1/ 0 ~ 4J../j-.rtfO 11 5' I I /:1/ B I I I I I I TOTALS I ~ of TOTAL .. TRAf Fie VOLUME SUMMARY I r~oJE-CT A/,;/!/ G-~~~../" DATE V{tlZ:(: 12JJOfDA~ INTilSECT ION OF: ..F'-;7& .bIn" J'@t:"/: AND ?5V~ h~tI 'j"e,:r- • T IMI ~6t; TO ('trt> 2#. P = P!.AI( HOUR. ~rj, J"PI7~ .. Ec. s-H=cur""..c:· V\Je.s1 b~~ I\Jc.r-+ "" Cc 01id 5c\..J~t:cv~ 15 T rM E • ~,. I L ., 5 R I L 5 R I L 5 I I L I 5 I (en I I I I #'tn> ~/5': 0 ($ I rt J I 1-1 I /5 . ~/j~ -!l"J<> I 0 It? 2-0 0 , Is qjt) ... 'itts" () • ( b g [5 I -II 7'1./~~ !"Ifb I ./ 1'1 -;-. Z 2.. 11 2"J 'I') !7fu -r/y 2-I I It.; 9 / 2-, ' 2JY 5"/J" .. r:J" C> 0 I /1-8 2 :? .2S" b":f*' -stf)' / . 0 /:1 t 0 0 l 2.0 .r~5-t~ 0 0 /0 #-/ /' It r""'_ ltJ //11" ~ ~~1" 1-2-I ;5.'77 2-' .s-1- I I I I TOTALS ~_.f TOTAL - " TRAr FIe VOLUME SUMMARY I r~oJE'cr /J1"J'J"/i/ 6~()1.J' DATE O'qdt:I{2PO¥ O~:1 :7"~ I NT! I S iC T ION OF: ~'i'~ /l1/e. SAND 5:" :217~Rr('t!'t.' , 5 • TIM! TO P = P!.AK HOU R os-;" n"v;' Z>;y Ec. s-l-bc::ur-.c· \AJe::s I b ~"'Sd 1\Jc.r-+~ Cc ur'id So \.J'"fi,., t:cv~ 15 o T I ME • ~, .. 1.fi?f'ln @ I L sl I I L 5 R I L 5 R I L 5 I (a"ft 1 1 1 I q/lV-~/r -5" III 6 Is-~ I 1.2r II 2l? Hlr" ( /tz :)1 , :P 2' IZ .fAT ,q;1t) -1-III ~ ij 2-yo /:f :;J--I! ~'I5' -S"fO /0 21.0 ;. JP ij 1'J" It ~o2. . I ~~ -S/~ C .. /9'1 It; 1£ ;-:28 /J 'r.1ftf1 &"/.5' -if lPP It> Ie 1-:P:? iF :Lf' ~s-_0 .-*:l-' ';/~ Cf ? 6 .J't> /1' .Jjl!2 rJ/) -{(jfJ 1-, /6'/ J> ~ 6 21 I~ 21."1 ~ ~ .. -J.j1S--r#s J'I _i-l/ .P( I :?2 z~ /2£ -SJ ~ I I I , I I TOTALS ~ of TOTAL .- Merrill Gardens Wells Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter'Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES . 0 .0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH NONE BOTH PARKVOLUMES 10 0 10 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 RIGHTTlJRNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 0 0 31 779 0 0 126 144 WIDTHS . 0 .0 .0 . 0 44.0 . 0 .0 22.0 . 0 LANES 0 0 0 0 4 '0 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS, .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 2.0 2.0 . 0 .0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO NO NO YES YES NO NO YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES .NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 6484 0 o 2829 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 29.17 32.83 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 5 RT 0 . 0 0 .00 . 0 .90 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 06/10/04 13:15:34 W .0 5 NONE 0 0 0 '.00 TH LT 0 0 .. 0 . 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0 .0 .90 .90 3 3 YES NO 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM ,NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Merrill Gardens Wells Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Int'ersection Averages: 06/10/04 13:13:42 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .29 Vehicle Delay 12.0 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** . / \ North I Phase 1 <* * * *' * * G/C= .417 G= 29.2" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 **** <**** G/C= .469 G= 32.8" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=47.4% C~ 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 1 90% Maxi vic Delay S Queue S Approach 13.4 B+ =============================================================================== ILT+TH I 22/2 I .145 I .417 I 1118 I 1179 I 300 I .254 I 13.4 I*B+I 86 ftl E Approach 11.5 B+ =============================================================================== TH+RTI 44/4 I .164 I .469 I 3041 I 3041 I 900 I .296 I 11.5 I*B+I 118 ftl Merrill Gardens Wells Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG..!H1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES · 0 . 0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH NONE BOTH PARKVOLUMES 10 0 10 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 0 0 33 820 0 0 133 152 WIDTHS . 0 · 0 . 0 . 0 44.0 . 0 . 0 22.0 . 0 LANES 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 · 0 .0 2.0 2.0 . 0 .0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 . 90 .90 . .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO NO NO YES YES NO NO YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 .4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATI ONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 6483 0 0 2829 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 29.17 32.83 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 5 RT 0 . 0 0 .00 . 0 .90 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2. o. 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 06/10/04 13:18:59 W .0 5 NONE 0 0 0 .00 TH LT 0 ·0 .0 .0 0 0 .00 .00 .0 .0 .90 .90 3 3 YES NO 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 NORM NORM 0 o . NONE NONE .00 1 . 0 0 Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 13:18:18 Wells Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .30 Vehicle Delay 12.1 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** . / \ North I Phase 1 <* * * * * * G/C= .417 G= 29.211 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF= .0% Phase 2 **** <**** G/C= .469 G= 32.8 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF=47.4% C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue S Approach .13.5 B+ =============================================================================== ILT+TH I 22/2 I .152 I .417 I 1118 I 1179 I· 317 I .269 I 13.5 I*B+I 91 ftl E Approach 11. 6 B+ =============================================================================== TH+RTI 44/4 1.171 1.469 I 3040 13040 I 948 1.312 I 11.6 I*B+I 124 ftl Merrill Gardens Wells Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P1P SIGNAL 97/TEAPAC [Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES · 0 . 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH NONE BOTH PARKVOLUMES 10 0 10 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 0 0 33 830 0 0 133 152 WIDTHS . 0 · 0 .0 .0 44.0 . 0 . 0 22.0 . 0 LANES 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 · 0 .0 2.0 2.0 .0 .0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO NO NO YES YES NO NO YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4·.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUP LOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00. 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 6483 0 0 2829 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 29.17. 32.83 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 5 RT 0 . 0 0 .00 . 0 .90 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 06/10/04 . 13:20:47 W .0 5 NONE 0 0 0 .00 TH LT 0 0 .0 .0 0 0 .00 .00 .0 .0 .90 .90 3 3 YES NO 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM 0 0 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 13: 20:,28 Wells Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P1P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection" Averages: Degree of Saturation (vic) .30 Vehicle Delay 12.1 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **1** . I \ North 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 -----------r------------- <* * * * * * G/c= .417 G= 29.211 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF= .0% **** <**** G/c= .469 G= 32.8 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF=47.4% c= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% " I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used. @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue S Approach 13.5 B+ =============================================================================== ILT+TH I· 22/2 1 .152 1 .417 1 1118 1 1179 1 317 1 .269 1 13.5 I*B+I 91 ftl E Approach 11. 6 B+ =============================================================================== TH + RT 1 44/4 1 . 172 1 . 469 1 3041 1 3 041 1 959 1 . 315 1 11. 6 1 * B+ 1 125 f t 1 Merrill Gardens Williams Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue C~rrent (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES . 0 . 0 · 0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES LEFT NONE BOTH PARKVOLUMES 10 0 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 64 171 0 0 667 169 0 0 0 WIDTHS 11. 0 22.0 .0 . 0 33.0 12.0 .0 · 0 . 0 LANES 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 .0 . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 · 0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES NO' NO YES YES NO NO NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 '4.0 .4.0 MINIMUMS . 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.b STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 .. 0 .2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1526 3165 0 o 4883 1579 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 21. 26 40.74 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 5 RT 0 .0 0 .00 . 0 .90 0 3 NO 4.0 5.0 2.0 . 2.0 1900 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 06/10/04 13:27:07 W .0 5 NONE 0 0 0 .00 TH LT 0 0 .0 . 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0 . 0 .90 .90 3 3 NO NO 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE .00 1 . 0 0 Merrill Gardens Williams Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue Current (2004) ·P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Sq 11 **/** / \ North I Degree of Saturation (v/c) .24 Vehicle Delay Phase 1 + * + * <+ * V G/C= .304 G= 21.3 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF= .0% Phase 2 <**** ++++ v G/C= .582 G= 40.7 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF=36.1% 9.6 06/10/04 13:26:42 Level Qf Service A C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = O ~ • 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Makl vic Delay S Queue -----~---------------------------------------------------------------~--------- N Approach 18.1 B =============================================================================== RT TH 1 11/1 I .086 I .304 I 22/2 .094 .304 E Approach 387 I 868 464 I 961 71 I .153 I 190 .198 17.9 I B I 18.2 *B 7.2 A 49 ftl 65 ft =============================================================================== I· TH 133/31.181 1.58212842128421 LT. 12/1 .171 .. 582 885 919 741 I .261 I 188 .205 7.3 I*A I 102 ftl 7.1 A 77 ft Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 Williams Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 13:30:02 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES . 0 .0 . 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES LEFT NONE BOTH NONE PARKVOLUMES 10 0 20 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT' TH LT VOLUMES 67 180 0 0 702 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 WIDTHS 11. 0 22.0 .0 . 0 33.0 12.0 .0 .0 . 0 . 0 .0 .0 LANES 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 .0 .0 2.0 2.0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES NO NO YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2;0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 ~. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 0,0 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1526 3165 0 o 4883 1579 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 21. 26 40.74 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 5 Merrill Gardens Williams Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG":H2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: . Degree of Saturation (v/c) Sq 11 ~ Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- . / \ North I + * + * <+ * V G/C= .304 G= 21.3 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF= .0% <**** ++++ v G/C= .582 G= 40.7 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF=36.1% .25 Vehicle Delay 9.7 06/10/04 13:29:39 Level of Service A C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec =88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqq Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay S Queue - N Approach '18.2 B =============================================================================== RT TH \ 11/1 \ .089 I .304 I 22/2 .098 .. 304 E Approach 387 I 868 464 I 961 74 I .159 I 200 .208 18.0 I B I 18.2 *B 7.3 A 51 ftl 69 ft =============================================================================== TH LT 1 33/31.1881.58212842128421 780 1.2741 12/1 .178 .582 885 919 . 198 .215 7.3 I*A I 107 ftl 7.1 A 81 ft Merrill Gardens Williams Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES .0 . 0 · 0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES LEFT NONE BOTH PARKVOLUMES 10 0 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC :00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 67 184 0 0 712 178 0 0 0 WIDTHS 11. 0 22.0 . 0 .0 33.0 12.0 .0 · 0 .0 LANES 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 .0 . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 · 0 . 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES ,YES NO NO YES YES NO NO NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00. 1.·00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1526 3165 0 0 4883 1579 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LJ.?G S OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 21. 26 40.74 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 5 RT 6 . 0 0 .00 . 0 .90 3 NO 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 06/10/04 13:31:58 W .0 5 NONE 0 0 0 .00 TH LT 0 0 .0 . 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0 . 0 .90 .90 3 3 NO NO 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM 0 0 NONE NONE .00 1 . 0 0 ! Merrill Gardens Williams Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P2P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary . Intersection Averages: Sq 11 **1** I \ North I Degree of Saturation (vic) .25 Vehicle Delay Phase 1 + * + * <+ * v G/c= .304 G= 21.3" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 <**** ++++ v G/C= .582 G= 40.7" Y+R= 4.0" OIi'F=36.1% 9.7 06/10/04 13:31:38 Level of SerVice A C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ------------------------------------~-------------------------~---------------- I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay .S Queue N Approach 18.2 B =============================================================================== RT TH I 11/1 I .089 I .304 I 22/2 .099 .304 E Approach 387 I 868 464 I 961 74 I .159 I 204 .212 18.0·1 B I 18.2 *B 7.3 A 51 ftl 70 ft . . . =============================================================================== TH LT 1 33/31.190 1.58212842128421 12/1 .178 .582 885 919 791 I .278 I 198 .215 7.4 I*A I 108 ftl 7.1 A 81 ft -------------------------------------------------------------------------------, Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 Burnett. Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 13:50:30 Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES . 0 .0 . 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 15 15 15 15 PARKINGSIDES LEFT LEFT BOTH NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 0 10 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 20 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 . Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 82 66 0 88 605 37 0 77 112 0 0 0 WIDTHS . 0 12.0 .0 . 0 33.0 .0 . 0 11. 0 12.0 . 0 .0 .0 LANES 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 1.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ,.90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0' 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2 .. 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2'.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 1538 0 0 4625 0 0 1408 1217 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 21 21 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 70 80 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 9.50 10.50 38.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 .00 CRITICALS 2 5 0 Merrill Gardens Burnett Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 13:50:09 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .37 Vehicle Delay 13.9 Level of Service B+ Sq 21 **/** / \ North I Phase 1 * * * * <* * v G/C= .144 G= 9.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= ' .0% Phase. 2 + + + + <+ + V <+ + + + + + G/C= .159 G= 10.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=20.5% Phase 3 ++++ <++++ ++++ V G/C= .576 G= 38.0" Y+R= .0" OFF=42.4% C= 66 sec G= 58.0 sec = 87.9% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ---------------------------,------------~--------------------------------------- I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I . Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 15.3 B =============================================================================== TH+RT I 12/1 I .154 I .364 I 494 I 559 I 164 I .293 I 15.3 I *B I 96 ft I S Approach 30.0 C ==================================================.============================= TH 111/1 1.102 1.159 1 155 I 219 1 86 1.384 I 26.0 I C+I 67 ftl LT 12/1 .153 .159 131 186 124 .639 32.9 C 97 ft E·Approach 9.5 A =============================================================================== I LT+TH+RT I 33/3 I .200 I .515 I 2382 I 2382 I 811 I .340 I 9.5 I*A I 122 ftl Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 Burnett Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 13:49:13 2004 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 . 0 . 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 15 15 15 15 PARKINGSIDES LEFT LEFT BOTH NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 0 10 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 20 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 86 69 0 92 637 39 0 81 118 0 0 0 WIDTHS .0 12.0 . 0 .0 33.0 . 0 .0 11. 0 12.0 .0 .0 .0 LANES 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 1.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 '2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 1538 0 0 4626 0 0 1408 1207 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 21 21 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAG S NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 70 80 10 PEDTIME . 0 0 GREENTIMES 9.50 10.50 38.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 .00 . CRITICALS 2 5 0 Merrill Gardens Burnett Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2004 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 13:48:52 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .39 Vehicle. Delay 14.3 Level of Service B+ Sq 21 **/** / \ North I Phase 1 * * * * <* * v G/C= .144 G= 9.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 + + + + <+ + V <+ + + + + + Phase 3 ++++ <++++ ++++ V G/C= .159 G/C= .576 G= 10 . 5 " . G= 38 . 0 " Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= .0" OFF=20.5% OFF=42.4% C= 66 ·sec . G= 58.0 sec = 87.9% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.1% Ped= .0 sec .0% I · Lane I Width/ I g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 1 90% Maxi' vic Delay S Queue N Approach 15.4 B =============================================================================== TH + RT I 12 / 1· I . 160 I . 3 64 I 4 94 I 55 9 I 173 I . 3 0 9 I 15 . 4 I * B I 1 02 f t I S Approach 31.8 C =============================================================================== TH LT I 11/1 I· .105 I .159 I 12/1 .161 .159 E Approach 155 I 130 219 I 184 90 I .402 I 131 .682 26.1 I C+I 70 ftl 35.7 D+ 102 ft 9.6 A ===================================================================="=========== ILT+TH+RTI 33/3 I .209 I· .515 I 2383 I 2383 I 853 I .358 I 9.6 I*A I 128 ftl Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 Burnett Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 13:53:05 2004 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P3P SIGNAL 97/TEAPAC [Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES . 0 . 0 .0 .0 PEDLEVELS 15 15 15 15 PARKINGSIDES LEFT LEFT BOTH NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 0 10 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 20 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 ·0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 93 78 0 102 637 39 0 94 118 0 0 0 WIDTHS . 0 12.0 . 0 .0 33.0 .0 .0 11. 0 12.0 . 0 .0 . 0 LANES 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 1.0 2.0 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .0 2.0 2.0 . 0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAY FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 I 1. 06 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 1541 0 0 4618 0 0 1408 1188 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 21 21 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 70 80 10 PEDTIME . 0 0 GREENTIMES 9.50 10.50 38.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 .00 CRITICALS 2 5 0 Merrill Gardens Burnett Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2004 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P3P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 13:52:43 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .40 Vehicle Delay 14.6 Level of Service B+ Sq 21 **/** . / \ North I Phase 1 * * * * <* * v G/C= G= Y+R= OFF= .144 9.5" 4.0" .0% Phase 2 + + + + <+ + v <+ + + + + + G/C= .159 G= 10.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=20.5% Phase 3 G/C= G= Y+R= ++++ <++++ ++++ V .576 38.0" .0" OFF=42.4% C= 66 sec G= 58.0 sec = 87.9% Y= 8.0 sec = 12.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0%. -------------------------'------------~----------------------------------------- I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach i5.6 B =============================================================================== TH+RTI 12/1 I .172 I .364 I 495 I 560 I. 190 I .3391 15.6 I*BI 112 ftl S·Approach 32.3 C ===========~=================================================================== TH LT I 11/1 I .118 I .159 I 12/1 .163 .159 .E Approach 155 I 127 219 I 181 104 I .464 I 131 .693 26.7 I C+I 81 ftl 36.7 D+ 102 ft 9.6 A =======~===========================~=========================================== I LT + TH + RT I 33/3 I . 211 I . 515 I 2379 I 2379 I 864 I . 363 I 9 . 6 I * A I 130 f t I Merrill Gardens Logan Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES . 0 . 0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 5 15 15 PARKINGSIDES BOTH NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 10 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 20 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 55 126 0 36 711 31 0 24 32 WIDTHS 11. 0 11. 0 . 0 . 0 44.0 . 0 . 0 12.0 . 0 LANES 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPER~ENTS 2.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS . 1: 00 l. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 l. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1297 1801 0 0 6466 0 0 1433 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 80 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 27.07 34.93 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 5 RT 0 . 0 0 .00 .0 .90 3 NO 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 06/10/04 13:59:27 W .0 15 NONE 0 0 0 .00 TH LT 0 0 .0 . 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0 .0 .90 .90 3 3 NO NO 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM 0 0 NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Merrill Gardens Logan Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour j File MG-C4P 06/10/04 13:59:03 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .24 Vehicle Delay 11~1 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** . / \ Phase 1 + * + * <+ * V Phase 2 **** <**** **** v North <+ + 1++ + + G/C= .387 . G/C= .499 G= 27.1" G= 34.9" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% OFF=44.4% C= 70 sec G= ~2.0 sec = ~8.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = Og,. • 0 I Lane I Width/ I· ·g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume· I HCM I L 1 90 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 14.3 B+ =============================================================================== RT TH I 11/1 I .089 I .387 I 11/1 .123 .387 S Approach 437 I 627 502 I 696 61 I .122 I 140 .201 13.9 I B+I 14.4 *B+ 13.9 B+ 37 ftl 84 ft. =============================================================================== ILT+TH I 12/1 I .083 I .387 I 48~ I 554 I 63 I .114 I 13.9 I B+ I 38 ft I E Approach 10.2 B+ =============================================================================== I LT + TH + RT I 44/4 I . 159 I . 499 I 3227 I 3227 I 864 I . 268 I 10 . 2 I * B+ I 106 f t I Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 Logan Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 14:01:56 2008 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES . 0 .0 . 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 5 15 15 15 PARKINGSIDES BOTH NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 10 0 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 20 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 58 133 0 38 749 33 0 25 34 0 0 0 WIDTHS 11. 0 11. 0 .. 0 .0 44.0 1.0 .0 12.0 . 0 . 0 .0 . 0 LANES 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 .0 2.0 2.0 .0 .0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 "1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1~00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATION;F'LOWS 1297 1801 0 0 6465 0 0 1422 0 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES . NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 70 80 10 PEDTIME . 0 0 GREENTIMES 27.07 34.93 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 5 Merrill Gardens Logan Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2Q08 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H4P 06/10/04 14:01:39 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .26 Vehicle Delay 11.2 Level of Service B+ Sq 111 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- / \ + * + * <+ * V North <+ + 1++ '+ + G/C= .387 G= 27.1" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% **** <**** **** v G/C= .499 G= 34.9" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=44.4%' C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= ~O sec = 0 9.-• 0 I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay S Queue N API?roach 14.3 B+ =============================================================================== RT TH I 11/1 I .092 I .387 I 11/1 .128 .387 S Approach 437 I 627 502 I 696 64 I .127 I 148 .213 14.0 I B+I 14.5 *B+ 13.9 B+ 39 ftl 89 ft ========~============================~=======================~=================. ILT+TH I 12/1 I .087 I .387 I 484 I 550 I 66 I .120 I 13.9 I B+I 40 ftl E Approach 10.3 B+ ==================================================================~============ ILT+TH+RTI 44/4 I .166 I .499 I 3227 I 3227 I 911 I .282 I 10.3 I*B+I 112 ftl Merrill Gardens Logan Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2008 P.M. Peak HQur with Project File MG-P4P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES . 0 .0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 5 15 15 PARKINGSIDES BOTH NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 10 0 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 20 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 58 133 0 38 759 33 0 25 34 WIDTHS 11. 0 11. 0 .0 . 0 44.0 . 0 . 0 12.0 . 0 LANES 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS YES YES NO YES YES YES NO YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 . STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM. NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 1297-1801 0 0 6466 0 0 1422 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 80 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 27.07 34.93 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 5 RT 0 .0 0 .00 .0 .QO 3 NO 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 06/10/04 14:03:33 W .0 15 NONE 0 0 0 .00 TH LT 0 0 .0 .0 0 0 .00 .00 .0 .0 .90 .90 3 3 NO NO 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM 0 0 NONE NONE .00 1 . 0 0 Merrill Gardens Logan Avenue S. @ South 2nd Avenue 2008 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P4P 06/10/04 14:03:14 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .26 Vehicle Delay 11.2 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** . I \ Phase 1 + * + ;, <+ * 'v North <+ + 1 + + + + G/C= .387 G= 27.1" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 **** <**** **** v G/C= .499 G= 34.9" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=44.4% . C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 ~ec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = O ~ • 0 I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 14.3 B+ =============================================================================== RT TH I 11/1 I .092 I .387 I 11/1 .128 .387 S Approach 437 I 627 502 I 696 64 I .127 I 148 .213 14.0 I B+I 14.5 *B+ 13.9' B+ 39 ftl 89 ft =============================================================================== ILT-tTH 1 12/1 1 .087 1 .387 1 484 1 550 1 661 .1201 13.91 B+I 40 ftl E Approach 10.3 B+ =============================================================================== 1 LT + TH + RT 1 44/4 1 . 167 1 . 499 1 3227 'I 3227 1 922 1 . 286 1 10 . 3 1 * B+I 114 f t 1 Merrill Gardens Wells Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1. 02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S· GRADES · 0 . 0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH BOTH BOTH PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 176 0 WIDTHS . 0 · 0 . 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 22.0 .0 LANES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 . . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 · 0 . 0 .0 . 0 .0 2.0 2.0 . 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO NO NO YES YES NO NO YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 i. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 2836 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 13.26 4.8 . 74 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 11 06/10/04 14:12:58 W .0 5 BOTH 20 5 0 .00 RT TH LT 0 920 156 . 0 22.0 .0 0 2 0 .00 .00 .00 . 0 2.0 2.0 .90 .90 .90 3 3 :3 YES YES NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM .NORM o 2815 0 NONE NONE .00 1 . 0 0 Merrill Gardens Wells Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Sq 11 **/** . / \ North I Degree of Saturation (v/c) .58 Vehicle Delay Phase 1 Phase 2 **** * *> ****> * * * * G/C= .189 G= 13.3 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF= .0% G/C= .696 G= 48.7 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF=24.7% 9.4 06/10/04 14:12:30 Level of Service A C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group. Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume . I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue S Approach 25.6 C+ ============================================~================================== TH+RTI 22/2 1.121 1.189 I 426 I 537 I 234 1·436 I 25.61*c+1 93 ftl W Approach 6.2 A =============================================================================== ILT+TH I 22/2 I .444 I .696 I 1960 I 1960 I 1195 I .610·1 6.2 I*A I 179 ftl Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 Wells Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 14:15:27 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES . 0 .0 . 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH BOTH BOTH BOTH PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS . 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0, 0 0 0 0 0 36 185 0 0 969 164 WIDTHS . 0 .0 . 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 22.0 . 0 . 0 22.0 .0 LANES 0 0 0 0 ·0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00. .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 .0 .0 2.0 2.0 . 0 .0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO NO NO YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4'.0 4.0 4.0 . MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 . 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 I DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUP TYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2836 0 0 2816 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 ·PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME . 0 0 GREENTIMES 13.26 48.74 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 11 Merrill Gardens . Wells Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Sq 11 **/** / \ North I Degree of Saturation (v/c) .61 Vehicle Delay Phase 1 Phase 2 **** * *> ****> * * * * G/C= .189 G= 13.3" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G/C= .696 G= 48.7" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=24.7% 9.7 06/10/04 14:15:09 Level of Service A ,C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj 'I ' I HCM I L 190 % Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume vic Delay S Queue S Approach 25.8 C+ =============================================================================== TH+RTI 22/2 1.125 1.189 I 426 I 537 I 246 1·458 I 25.81*c+1 98 ftl W Approach 6.6 A .=============================================================================== ILT+TH 122/2 1·464 1·696 I 1960 I 1960 I 1259 1·642 I 6 . 6 I * A, I 188 f t I " Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 Wells Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 14:16:44 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 . 0 . 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH BOTH BOTH BOTH PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 185 0 0 973 164 WIDTHS .0 . 0 .0 . 0 .0 . 0 .0 22.0 . 0 . 0 22.0 .0 LANES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 .0 .0 . 0 .0 . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 . 0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO NO NO YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00.1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES 'NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 2836 0 o 2816 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME . 0 0 GREENTIMES 13.26 48.74 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 8 11 Merrill Gardens Wells Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P5P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -9apacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Sq 11 **/** / \ North I Degree of Saturation (v/c) .61 Vehicle Delay Phase 1 Phase 2 **** * *> ****> * * * * G/C= .189 G= 13.3 11 Y+R=·4.0 11 OFF= .0% G/C= .696 G= 48.7 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF=24.7% 9.7 06/10/04 14:16:24 Level of Service A C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% y= 8~0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic. Delay S Queue S Approach 25.8 C+ =============================================================================== TH+RTI 22/2 I .125 I .189 I 426 I 537 I 246 I .458 I· 25.8 l*c+1 98 ftl W Approach 6.6 A ====================================================================~========== ILT+TH I 22/2 I .465 I .696 I 1960 I 1960 I 1263 I .644 I 6.6 I*A I 189 ftl Merrill Gardens 06/10/04 Williams Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 14:26:18 Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES .0 .0 · 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH BOTH BOTH BOTH PARKVOLUMES 20 0 20 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters \ MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH L.T VOLUMES 0 296 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 ·124 909 0 WIDTHS. . 0 22.0 .0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 · 0 . 0 . 0 22.0 .0 LANES 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 . 0 .0 .0 · 0 . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ·3 ACTUATIONS NO YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.(J 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 2.0 2.0 2.0 END GAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 l. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 l. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 2837 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3191 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .00 1 CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 19.70 42.30 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 Merrill Gardens Williams Avenue S. @ 'South 3rd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 14:25:47 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .57 Vehicle Delay 12.2 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** . Phase 1 * * * * / \ * *> v North I G/C= .281 G= 19.7" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 ****> **** v G/C= .604 G= 42.3" . Y+R= 4.0" OFF=33.9% C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6%· Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% -------------------------------------~--------------------------~-------------- I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used. @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM ·1 L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 21.5 C+ ==============================================================================~ ILT+TH 122/2 I .178 I .281 I 701 I 798 I 392 I .49·1 I 21.5 l*c+1 139 ftl ------------------------------------------"------------------------------------~ W Approach 9.1 A ============================================================================"=== TH+RT I 22/2 I .382 I .604 I 1928 I 1928 I 1148 I .595 I 9.1 I*A I 223 ftl ------------------~------------~-------------------------------~--------------- Merrill Gardens '06/10/04 Williams Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 14:28:12 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S W GRADES . 0 · 0 · 0 .0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH BOTH BOTH BOTH PARKVOLUMES 20 0 20 0 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 312 60 0 0 0 0 o ~ 0 131 957 0 WIDTHS . 0 22.0 . 0 . 0 · 0 . 0 . 0 · 0 . 0 . 0 22.0 .0 LANES 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 · 0 . 0 .0. · 0 .0 2.0 2.0 .0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5;0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 .1.00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUP TYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 2836 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3190 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET .. 00 1 CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME .0 0 GREENTIMES 19.70 42.30 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 Merrill Gardens Williams Avenue S.@ South 3rd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 14:27:54 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .60 Vehicle Delay 12.6 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** . Phase 1 * * * * / \ * *> v North I G/C== .281 G== 19.7 11 Y+R== 4.0 11 OFF== .0% Phase 2 ****> **** v G/C== .604 G== 42.3 11 Y+R== 4.0 11 OFF==33.9% C== 70 sec G== 62.0 sec == 88.6% Y== 8.0 sec == 11.4% Ped== .0 sec == .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E . Volume I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 21.8 C+ =============================================================================== ILT+TH 'I 22/2 I .186 I .281 I 701 I ,798 I 414 I .519 I 21.8 l*c+1 146 ftl W Approach 9.5 A =========================================================~===================== TH+RT I 22/2 I .399 I .604 I 1928 I 1928 I 1209 I .62.7 I 9.5 I*A I 235 ftl Merrill Gardens Williams Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N E S GRADES . 0 . 0 · 0 PEDLEVELS 5 5 5 PARKINGSIDES BOTH BOTH BOTH PARKVOLUMES 20 0 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 5 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00· .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH . LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 312 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 WIDTHS .0 22.0 . 0 . 0 .0 . 0 .0 · 0 . 0 LANES 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS .0 2.0 2.0 . 0 .0· . 0 . 0 · 0 . 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 190b 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.0'0 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 2833 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET CYCLES 70 70 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 19.70 42.30 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 RT 131 .0 '0 .00 2.0 .90 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 06/10/04: 14:29:24 W .0 5 BOTH 0 0 0 .00 TH LT 961 0 22.0 .0 2 0 .00 .00 2.0 .0 .90 .90 3 3 YES NO 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2 .. 0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM 3191 0 J NONE NONE .00 1 .0 0 Merrill. Gardens Williams Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P6P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 14:29:07 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .60 Vehicle Delay 12.7 Level of Service B+ I Sq 11. **/** Phase 1 * * * * / \ * *> v North I G/C= .281 G= 19.711 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF= .0% Phase 2 ****> **** v G/C= .604 G= 42.3 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF=33.9% C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8~0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume . I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 21.8 C+ =============================================================================== ILT+TH I 22/2 I .187 I .281 I 700 I 797 I 418 I .524 I 21.8 l*c+1 148 ftl W Approach 9.5 A =============================================================================== TH+RT I 22/2 I .401 I .604 I 1928 I 1928 I 1214 I .630 I 9.5 I*A I 236 ftl Merrill Gardens Burnett Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter. Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION NONCBD 15 C S o 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N GRADES .0 PEDLEVELS 15 PARKINGSIDES RIGHT PARKVOLUMES 10 BUSVOLUMES 10 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 64 44 WIDTHS . 0 12.0 .0 LANES-0 1 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 1301 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 70 80 GREENTIMES 17.19 44.81 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 E S .0 .0 15 15 NONE NONE 0 10 0 0 0 0 .00 .00 RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 0 0 70 95 0 . 0 .0 . 0 11. 0 11. 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 3 3 ·3 3 3 3 NO NO NO YES YES NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 1518 1801 0 NO-NO LEAD LAG S YES YES OFFSET 10 PEDTIME 06/10/04 14:55:09 RT 0 .0 0 .00 .0 .90 3 NO 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 w .0 15 BOTH o o o .00 TH 932 22.0 2 .00 2.0 .90 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM o 3205 NONE .00 . 0 LT 90 . 0 0 .00 2.0 .90 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 NONE 1 0 Merrill Gardens Burnett Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue Current (2004) P.M. Peak Hour File MG-C7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 14:54:51 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .50 Vehicle Delay 10.4 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** Phase 1· * * * * / \ * *> v Phase 2 **** North I + +> ****> + + + + G/C= .246 G= 17.2" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% C= 70 sec G/C= .640 G= 44.8" Y+R= 4.0"· OFF=30.3% G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Rate I Adj I Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 22.7 C+ =============================================================================== ILT+TH 112 / 1 1 . 14 6 1 . 24 6 1 244 1 3 191 12 0 1 . 3 7 6 1 22 . 7 1 * C + 1 89 f t 1 S Approach 21.4 C+ =============================================================================== RT TH I 11/1 I .093 I .246 I 11/1 ·.100 .246 ·W Approach 292 I 355 373 I 442 78 I .209 I . 21. 3 I C+ I i06 .240 21.4 C+ 7.4 A 58 ftl 79 ft =============================================================================== ILT+TH I 22/2 I .377 I .640 I 2052 I 2052 I· 1136 I .554 I 7.4 I*A I 201 ftl Merrill Gardens Burnett Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue, 2006 P.M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Pa~ameters METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION NONCBD 15 C S o 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS N GRADES . 0 PEDLEVELS 15 PARKINGSIDES RIGHT PARKVOLUMES 10 BUSVOLUMES 10 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 67 46 WIDTHS . 0 12.0 . 0 LANES 0 1 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90, .90 .90 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO YES YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 ,2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAYFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 1296 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES, 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 70 80 GREENTIMES 17.19 44.81 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 E S · 0 . 0 15 15 NONE NONE 0 10 0 0 0 0 .00 .00 RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 0 0 74 100 0 . 0 · 0 .0 11. 0 11. 0 .0 0 0 0 1 1 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 0 · 0 . 0 2.0 2.0 .0 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90' 3 3 3 3 3 3 NO NO NO YES YES NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 '5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 ' 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 1518 1801 0 NO NO LEADLAGS YES YES OFFSET 10 PEDTIME 06/10/04 14:53:05 RT '0 .0 0 .00 . 0 .90 3 NO 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 w .0 15 BOTH o o o .00 TH 981 22.0 2 .00 2.0 .90 3' YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM o 3205 , NONE .00 . 0 LT 95 . 0 0 .00 2.0 .90 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 NONE 1 0 Merrill Gardens Burnett Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 2006 P~M. Peak Hour without Project File MG-H7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 14:52:47 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .52 Vehicle Delay 10.7 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** Phase 1 * * * * / \ * *> v Phase 2 **** North I + +> ****> + + + + G/C= .246 G= 17.2" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G/C= .640 G= 44.8" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=30.3% C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = 0 9.-• a I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I Group Lanes ReqdUsed @C (vph~ @E Volume I HCM I L 190 % Maxi vic Delay. S Queue N Approach 22.9 =============================================================================== ILT+TH I 12/1 I .150 I .246 I 243 I 318 I 125 I .393 I 22.9 l*c+1 93 ftl S Approach 21.5 C+ ================~============================================================== RT TH 1 11/1 I .097 I .246 I 292 I 11/1 .104 .246 355 W Approach 373 I 442 82 I .220 I 111 .251 21. 4 I C+ I 21.5 C+ 7.7 A 61 ftl 82 ft =============================================================================== ILT+TH I 22/2 I .394 I .640 I 2052 I 2052 I 1196 I .583 I 7.7 I*A I 212 ftl Merrill Gardens Burnett Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1. 02.12] -Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS "N E S GRADES . 0 .0 . 0 PEDLEVELS 15 15 15 PARKINGSIDES RIGHT NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 10 0 10 BUSVOLUMES 10 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC .00 .00 .00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 72 50 0 0 0 74 107 0 WIDTHS . 0 12.0 . 0 . 0 . 0 . 0 11. 0 11. 0 . 0 LANES 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 UTILIZATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRUCKPERCENTS . 0 2.0 2.0 . 0 . 0 .0 2.0 2.0 . 0 PEAKHOURFACTORS .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 .90 ARRIVAL TYPES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO YES YES NO NO NO YES YES NO REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 STARTUPLOST 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ENDGAIN 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 "2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 DELAY FACTORS 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00' NSTOPFACTORS 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 1284 0 0 0 0 1518 1801 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 11 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEAD LAGS OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET" CYCLES 70 80 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 17.19 44.81. YELLOWTIME$ 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 2 11 RT 0 .. 0 0 .00 . 0 .90 3 NO 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM 0 06/10/04 14:57:14 W .0 15 BOTH 0 0 0 .00 TH LT 981 101 22.0 .0 2 0 .00 .00 2.0 2.0 .90 .90 3 3 YES YES 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 NORM NORM 3203 0 NONE NONE .00 1 . 0 0 Merrill Gardens Bur,nett Avenue S. @ South 3rd Avenue 2006 P.M. Peak Hour with Project File MG-P7P SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.12] -Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: 06/10/04 14:56:56 Degree of Saturation (v/c) .53 Vehicle Delay 10.9 Level of Service B+ Sq 11 **/** . Phase 1 Phase 2 * * * * / \ * *> v North I **** + +> ****> + + + + G/C= .246 G= 17.211 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF= .0% G/C= .640 G= 44.8 11 Y+R= 4.0 11 OFF=30.3% C= 70 sec G= 62.0 sec = 88.6% Y= 8.0 sec = 11.4% Ped= .0 sec = .0% I Lane IWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj 'I Group . Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume I HCM I L 190% Maxi vic Delay S Queue N Approach 23.2 C+ ======================================================~======================== ILT+TH I 12/1 I .161 I .246 I 241 I 315 I 136 I .432 I '23.2 l*c+1 101 ftl S Approach 21.5 C+ =============================================================================== RT TH I 11/1 I .097 I .246 I 11/1 .109 .246 W Approach 292 I 355 373 I 442 82 I .220 I ,119 .269 21. 4 I ,C+ I 21.7 C+ 7.7 A 61 ftl 88 ft =============================================================================== I LT+TH ' I 22/2 I .396 I .640 I 2050 I 2050 I 1202 I .586 I 7.7 I*A I 213 ftl Two-Way Stop Control Page 10f2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information . Site Information Intersection S. TobinlBurnett Avenue IAnalyst C. V. Brown S. IAgency/Co. Merrill Gardens Uurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6110104 Analysis Year 2004 !Analysis Time Period P. M. PeakHour Project ID Merrill Gardens File MG- CBP EastlWest Street: S; Tobin street North/South Street: Burnett Avenue S. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R rvolume 0 53 29 5 5 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0:92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 57 31 5 5 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R rvolume 4 0 2 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0;92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N . Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service lAPP roach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR Iv (vph) 5 6 C (m) (vph) 1520 941· IV/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.02 Control Delay 7.4 B.9 LOS A A Approach Delay - -B.9 Approach LOS --A file:IIC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k5192.TMP 6/10104 Two-Way Stop Control Page 10f2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection S. TobinlBurnett Avenue !Analyst C. V.Brown S. Agency/Co. Merrill Gardens Uurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6110104 Analysis Year 2006 without Project Analysis Time Period P. M. PeakHour Project ID M,errill Gardens File MG- HBP East/West Street: S. Tobin Street North/South Street: Burnett Avenue S. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ~olume 0 56 31 5 7 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 . 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 -60 33 5 7 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 --0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R iVolume 4 0 2 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) . -0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0- RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service !Approach NB SB . Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR ~ (vph) -5 6 C (m) (vph) 1514 935 ~/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.02 Control Delay 7.4 B.9 LOS A A fA.pproach Delay --B.9 fA.pproach LOS - -A file:IIC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\ti2k104.TMP 6/10104 Two-Way Stop Control Page 10f2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection S. TobinlBurnett Avenue IAnalyst C. V. Brown S. IAgency/Co. Merrill Gardens Uurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6110104 Analysis Year 2006 with Project lAna lysis Time Period P. M. PeakHour Project ID Merrill Gardens File MG- PBP '. EastlWest Street: S. Tobin Street . North/South Street: Burnett Avenue S . Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 56 31 5 7 0 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 60 33 5 7 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 --0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L . T R Volume 5 0 2 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N , Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbol,Jnd Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph) .5 7 C (m) (vph) 1514 931 vic 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.02 Control Delay 7.4 8.9 LOS A A Approach Delay - -B.9 Approach LOS --A file:IIC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k6230.TMP 6110104 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection S. TobinlWilliams Ave. S. !Analyst C. V. Brown Wurisdiction City of Renton IAllenCY/Co. Merrill Gardens ~nalysis Year 2004 Date Performed 6110104 !Analysis Time Period P.M. Peak Hour Project 10 Merrill Gardens File MG- C9P EastlWest Street: S. Tobin Street North/South Street: Williams A venue S. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ~olume 0 0 0 0 131 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 145 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 --0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R ·L T R ~olume 3 0 0 0 0 34 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 . 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 0 0 0 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service . IApproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT TR ~ (vph) 3 37 C (m) (vph) 890 991 ~/c 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.01 0.12 Control Delay 9.1 8.8 LOS A A ~pproach Delay - -9.1 8.8 ~pproach LOS --A A Copyright ©2000 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 file:/IC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k9325.TMP 6110104 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection S. TobinlllVilliams Ave. S. iAnalyst C. V. Brown !Jurisdiction c7fV of Renton iAgency/Co. Merrill Gardens iAnalysis Year 2008 without Project Date Performed 6110104 iAnalysis Time Period P.M. Peak Hour Project ID Merrill Gardens File MG- H9P EastlWest Street: S. Tobin Street North/South Street: Williams Avenue S. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 lVehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 8 138 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0, 8 153 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 --0 - - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 3 0 0 0 0 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 0 0 0 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) o· 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service IApproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT TR ~ (vph) 8 3 40 C (m) (vph) 1636 858 991 IY/c 0.00 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.13 Control Delay 7.2 9.2 8.8 LOS A A A lAPP roach Delay --9.2 8.8 lApp roach LOS --A A Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 file:IIC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2kE2C5.TMP 6110104 Two-Way Stop Control Page 10f2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ~nalyst C. V. Brown Intersection S. TobinlvVilliams Ave. S. ~gency/Co. Merrill Gardens Uurisdiction City of Renton Date Performed 6110104 Analysis Year 2008 without Project ~nalysis Time Period P. M. Peak Hour Project ID Merrill Gardens File MG- H9P EastlWest Street: S. Tobin Street North/South Street: Williams A venue S. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments I I Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5· 6 L T Rl L T R Volume 0 0 0 8 138 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 153 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 --0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 3 0 0 0 0 40 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 0 0 0 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized ' 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Delay. Queue Length and Level of Service fA.pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT TR v (vph) 3 44 P (m) (v ph) 878 983 ~/c 0.00 0.04 95% queue length '0.01 0.14 Control Delay 9.1 8.8 LOS A A fA.pproach Delay --9.1 8.8 fA.pproach LOS --A A Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 file:IIC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k323.TMP 6110104 Two-Way Stop Control Page 10f2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection Burnett Ave'/Site ~nalyst C. V. Brown Driveway AQency/Co. Merrill Gardens !Jurisdiction Cjty_ of Renton Date Performed 6110104 ~nalysis Year 2006 with Project ~nalysis Time Period P. M. Peak Hour Project ID Merrill Gardens File MG- P10P EastlWest Street: Access Driveway North/South Street: Burnett Avenue S. Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 87 23 1 11 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0' 96 25 1 12 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 --0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R lVolume 19 0 4 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 0 4 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Levelof Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR . v (vph) 1 25 C (m) (vph) 1479 888 vIc 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.00 0.09 Control Delay 7.4 9.2 LOS A A Approach Delay - -9.2 ~pproach LOS - -A file:IIC:\WINDOWS\TEMP\u2k2034.TMP 6110104 Appendix -Statistical Analysis of Intersection Accidents While the accident reviews of pages 15 and 16 may be considered somewhat generalized in that the link accident rate references are based on WSDOT published statistics an additional analysis was undertaken as shown below. For this analysis the Control Chart Method was used. The level of significance was also set at 0.95 as commonly done. In the Control Chart Method a critical accident rate is calculated for each intersection based on the average accident rate for all sampled intersections in the network where approach volumes are available in terms of their ADT .. Where the actual accident rate is larger than the critical rate (as highlighted in the following table) the deviation is most likely not due to chance but, rather, due to an unfavorable characteristic. This analysis will allow the city to review in depth. how their existing CBD system is functioning. TABLE IV Control Chart Analysis, p=0.95 Intersection 3-year Fx. . Int. Vol. Rate Critical Rate Burnett Ave. @ S. 3rd St. 8 18.14 0.38 1.15 Burnett Ave. @ S. 2nd St. 4 20.90 0.44 1.63 Williams Ave. @ S. 3rd St. 14 17.19 0.81 2.40 Williams Ave. @ S. 2nd St. 15 17.58 0.86 2.43 Wells Ave. @ S. 3rd St. 10 13.26 0.75 1.30 Wells Ave. @s. I'd St 30 17.58 1. 71* 1.42* Logan Ave. @ S. 2nd St. 25 20.40 1.23 1.31 In the above able the following abbreviations are used. Int. Vol. 3-year Fx. Rate Critical Rate = Total Daily Traffic volume at the intersection. Total intersection 3-year accident frequency. Accident rate for the intersection (Accidents per MEV) Critical accident rate = upper control limit at p = 0.95 When reviewing Table IV it will be seen that only one intersection, denoted with an *, has an accident rate that exceeds the "critical accident rate" computed for that intersection at the noted level of significance. However, considering the limited scope of the data, in the absence of volume date for the other intersections descried in Table III of the TIA, it would not be appropriate to place significant weight on the above findings. Nonetheless, it may be reasonable for the city to reviews the types of accidents at Wells Avenue S. and: South 2nd Street it see if a pattern exists that inay account for the high frequency. Christopher ·5rown t11 Associates 9688 Qainier Ave. &. ~eattle. WA 98118-5981 (206) 722-1910 fax (206) 722-1909 I~--------------------~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o o o 0 GEOTEXTlLE FILTER FABRIC (Mirafi 140 N. or equivalent) NOTES: 0 0 0 Basement Wall Slope to drain 0 o 0 0 FREE-DRAINING 0 BACKFILL MATERIAL (Compacted to 90% Max DryDensity) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : ... :. :. : :::;.: :::.-:: : .... ,.' '. -.' . .. '. '. ........ '.':. : ::: :-: Vertical Drain Mat (Maradrain 6000 or equivalent) Minimum 4-inch diameter rigid slotted. or perforated PVC pipe with positive gradient to discharge Free Draining Material (Washed gravel) NOT TO SCALE I.) Do not replace rigid PVC pipe with flexiible corrugated plastic pipe. 2.) Perforated or slotted PVC pipe should be tight jointed and laid with perforations or slots down, with positive gradient to discharge. 3.) Do not connect roof downspout drains into the footing drain or under slab drain system. 4.) Basement wall backfill to be compacted to 90% of maximum dry density based on Modified Proctor (ASTM 0-1557-91). The top 12-inches to be compacted to 95% of maximum dry density if backfill is to support sidewalks, driveway, etc. • Group Northwest, Inc. Geotechnical engineers. Geologists, & environmental Scientists TYPICAL BASEMENT WALL AND FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE RENTON WASHINGTON SCALE NONE DATE 6/11104 MADE WJL CHKD we JOB NO. G-1812 PLATE 3 I I I I I I APPENDIX A BORING LOGS I G-1812 I I I I I I I I I I I Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I LEGEND OF SOil CLASSIFICATION AND PENETRATION TEST I UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (Uses) MAJOR DIVISION· GROUP TYPICAL DESCRIPTION LABORATORY ClASSIFICATION CRITERIA SYMBOL I CLEAN GIN WELL GRADED GRAVElS, GRAVEL.sAND Cu = (080 I 010) gl8aler than 4 GRAVELS MIXTURE. LIT1lE OR NO FINES . DETERMINE Cc = (03&) I (010 • 080) bat\wen 1 and 3 PERCENTAGES OF I I GRAVELS Oltlleorno GP POORLY GRADED GRAVElS, AND GRAVEL..sANO GRAVEL. AND SAND NOT MEETING ABOVE REQUIREMENTs (More Than Half fines) MIXTURES LIT1lE OR NO ANES FROM GRAIN SIZE COARSe. Coan\a Grain. DISTRIBUTION GRAINED SOILS Larger Than No. 4 CURVE· ATTERBERG UMITS BELOW Sieve) DIRTY GM SILlY GRAVElS, GRAVEL.sAND-SlLT MIXTURES "A·UNE. (,;RAVELS CONTENT or 1'.1. LESS THAN 4 OFANES (with some CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEI..sANo.<:LAY EXCEEiDS12'l11 ATTERBERG UMITS ABOVE fineal· GC MIXTURES COARSE GRAINED "A" UNE. . SOILS ARE or P.L MORETHAN 7 I I ClASSlRED AS Cu = (D6O I 010) graalJlr than 8 SANDS CLEAN SN WELL GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, FOLLOWS: SANDS UTTLS OR ND ANES Cc .. (D3&) I (010 • 080) between 1 and 3 (More Than Halt Olllleorno POORLY GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, < 5% Ana Grained: .. More Than Halt by CoaJaaGraina SP NOT MEETING ABOVE REQUIREMENTS Smaller Than No. fines) um..E OR NO RNES GW, GP, SW, SP Weight Larger Than No. 200 4 SIeve) ATTERBERG UMITS BELOW SI_ DIRTY 8M SILlY SANDS, SANQ;sJLT MIXTURES :> 12'l11 Rne Gralnad: "A"UNE SANDS GM, GC, SM, SC CONTENT OF with P.1. LESS THAN 4 RNES I (with some 511112'l11 Ane exCEEOS12'l11 A1TERBERG UMITS ABOVE finea) ~C ClAYEY SANDS; SANo.<:LAY MIXTURES Grained: use dual .. ,.. .. UNE symbols with P.1. MORETHAN 7 I I I SILTS UquidUmlt • ML INORGANIC SILTS, ROCK FlOUR, SANOY SILlS eo (Below A-Une on < 5O'lIo OF SUGHT PLASTICITY V1 +ne V PlasticIty Chart, PLASTICITY CHART ~ FlNE·GRAlNED . Nagllgible UquidUmit INORGANIC SILlS, MICACEOUS OR 50 FOR SOIL PASSING SOILS Organic) :> 50'11. MH DIATOMACEOUS, RNE SANDY OR SILlY SOIL NO. 40 SIEVE CHorOH ~ g If / INORGANIC ClAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY, ClAYS UquldUmit CL GRAVELLY, SANOY, OR SILlY CLAYS, CLEAN ~4O V 'I' (Above A-Une on <30110 C / ClAYS i!!O PIu1Icity Chart, - Nagllglble UquldUmlt CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PlASTICITY. FAT 530 / CLorOL V Organic) :> sow. CLAYS i= More Than Half ..., UquidUmit ~20 V V MHorOH Weight Larger ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILlY ClAYS OF ORGANIC SILTS & OL a. / Than No. 200 < 60'1(, LOW PLAsnCJTY Sieve ClAYS 10 I (Balow A-Une on 7 I ~I.-I\I I OL prML Plasticity Chart) LlquldUmlt OH ORGANIC ClAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY 0 4 " :> 6O'l6 0 10 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 90 100 110 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS UQUIO UMrr (%) I SOIL PARnCLE SIZE GENERAL QUIDANCE! OF SOIL ENGINEERING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE! PRoPERnes PROM STANDARD PENE!TRAnoN TEST (SPT) I PRACTlON Passing Retained SANDY SOILS SILTY & CLAYEY SOILS SIeve Size Siava SIze Unconfined Blow Relative Friction Blow (mml (mml Counlll Density Angle Description Counts strength Description I SILT I CLAY #200 0.075 N '" $, dagrae N qu,lIIt §!r!Q 0·4 0·15 Very Loose <2 <0.25, Very soft FINE #40 0.425 #200 0.075 4·10 15·35 28. SO Loose 2-4 0.25 ·0.50 Soft I MEDIUM #10 2.00 #40 0.425 10·30 35·65 28·35 Madlum 0l1li88 4·8 0.50 ·1.00 Medium Stiff COARSE #4 4.75 #10 2.00 SO-SO 65·65 35·42 D8IIIIe 8-15 1.00·2.00 Stiff GRAVEl >50 65·100 I 38·48 Very Dense 15-SO 2.00·4.00 Vesy Stiff I FINE 19 #4 4.75 >SO >4.00 HaId COARSE 78 19 - I I COBBLES 78 mm III 203 mm • Group Northwest, Inc. BOULDERS :>203mm Geotechnical engineers, Geologlate, & ~ ROCK Envlro nmental SClent~ FRAGIIENTS· >78mm 13240 NE20Ih street, Suite 12 Bellevue, WA !18005 ROCK >D.78 cubic meter In IIOlume Phone (425) 849-8757 Fax(425)~8 PLATE Al I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING NO. B-1 Depth (1\) --- 5 --- Logged By: USCS ML ---- SP-SM ----- -ML 10 -_~ __ - -- 15 ---- 20 - GP- GW WJL Date Drilled: 5/26/04 Soil Description 2" Asphalt Sandy SILT, SAND & SILT, mottled brown to brown, fine sand, soft to medium stiff silt & very loose sand, damp to moist ---------------- GRAVEL, with sand, fine to coarse, dense to medium dense, damp to wet -~~--~----------------ML SILT, gray, some fine sand, medium stiff, wet 25 -~ .. --~---------------- 30 --Gravelly SAND, gray, fine to coarse, dense, wet sw - - 35 ~------~------------------------------~ - - 40 - 45 - - 50 -- LEGEND: • Total Depth = 34 feet Boring Location: Middle of site Driller: R&R Drilling Co Type: Hollow stem auger 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Interval I Sampler driven with 140 lb. Hanuner (Standard SPT) Group Northwest, Inc. Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists, & Environmental Scientists JOB NO. SAMPLE Type No. I I I I I I SI S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 I S7 I S8 I S9 Surface Elev. SPT(N) Blows per 6-inches 2,2,1 N=3 1,0,1 N= 1 2,2,3 N=5 19,24,26 N=50 38,38,28 N=66 11,14,12 N=26 3,2,3 N=5 15,16,21 N=37 22,27,39 N=66 Water Content % 29.3 8.8 39.3 23.1 3.4 10.3 32.5 19.2 14.7 feet +/- Drilling! Sampling Infonnation & Observations Harder drilling at 9.5 feet Water enc01Ultered at 17.5 feet bgs (+/-) Encountered Heave N: Number of blow counts for 1 foot of sampler advancement. BORING LOG MCLENDON HARDWARE PROPERTY BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON G-1812 DATE 6/11104 .1 PLATE A2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING NO. B-2 Logged By: Depth (ft) USCS ----ML ---- WJL Date Drilled: 5/26/04 Soil Description 3" Asphalt. Pit Run to 1.5' SILT, mottled brown to brown, soft to stiff, some fine sand, damp to moist (FILL?) 10 --++---------~------------------------------------------------------------~ -- - 15 - GP Sandy GRAVEL, fine to coarse gravel, fine to medium sand, dense, damp ----------------------------- 20 ----- 25 ----- SP& ML SAND & SILT, brown, medium coarse to fine, some gravel, medium dense, wet, with interbeds of medium stiff silt Wood Log @28 feet 30 --++---------~------------------------------------------------------~ --- 35 --- - 40 ----- 45 ----- 50 --- LEGEND: • Total Depth = 30 feet (Refusal-Wood) Boring Location: Middle of site Driller: R&R Drilling Co Type: Hollow stem auger 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Interval I Sampler driven with 140 lb. Hammer (Standard SPT) Group Northwest, Inc. Geotechnical Engineers. Geologists. & Environmental Scientists JOB NO. Surface Elev. feet +/- SAMPLE SPT (N) Water Drilling! Sampling Infonnation & Observations Blows per Content 6-inches % Type No. I I I I I I I :r: SI S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S7 3,3,3 N=6 7,7,7 N=14 3,2,1 N=3 7,10,16 N=26 7,20,20 N=40 10,9,5 N=14 1,0,6 N=6 50/6" N= 100 28.3 23.5 21.9 15.6 3.9 10.8 24.2 45.0 Gravelly drilling at 10 feet Water encountered at 17.5 feet bgs (+/-) Wood Log from 28 to 30 feet N: Number of blow counts for 1 foot of sampler advancement. BORING LOG MCLENDON HARDWARE PROPERTY BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON G-1812 DATE 6/11/04 .1 PLATE A3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING NO. B-3 Depth (ft) 5 _ 10 -- - 15 - Logged By: USCS ML &SM WJL Date Drilled: 5/26/04 Soil Description I" Asphalt SILT & Silty SAND, dark gray, black to gray, with sand and debris, moist, concrete rubble, gray silty SAND with gravel moist (FILL) --~------------- ML to 8M SILT & Silty SAND, brown, some gravel, medium stiff to medium dense, damp to moist ------------------------- ML to SM Silt and Silty Sand, gray, interbedded, some gravel, medium stiff to dense, damp to moist SAMPLE Type No. I Sl I I I S2 S3 S4 S5 SPT(N) Blows per 6-inches 24,5,6 N= 11 8,14,15 N=29 6,3,4 N=7 10, 11,11 N=22 Surface Elev. Water Content % 19.2 12.0 29.5 16.3 feet +1- Drilling! Sampling Infonnation & Observations Concrete rubble at 4 to 6 feet 20 - -------------------------I S6 2,6,42 N=48 (ROCK) 34.7 Water encountered at 22 feet bgs (+/-). - 25 - SW-SM & SP-SM SAND, mottled brown, interbedded gravel lenses, fine to coarse, some silt, dense, wet I S7 39,39,33 N=72 10.1 S7 -H---t------------I I 30 8,14,22 N=36 25.6 --- 35 - - 40 - 45 - 50 _ LEGEND: I Total Depth = 29 feet Boring Location: North end of site Driller: R&R Drilling Co Type: Hollow stem auger 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample lnterval Sampler driven with 140 lb. Hammer (Standard SPT) • Gro~g~~,~!:!~:!!:.~nc. Eiwironrrental Scientists JOB NO. N: Number of blow counts for 1 foot of sampler advancement. BORING LOG MCLENDON HARDWARE PROPERTY BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON G-1812 DATE 6/11/04 .1 PLATE A4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE RENTON, WASHINGTON Project No. G-1812 Prepared for Mr. Steve Friedman Friedman Development, LLC P.O. Box 1018 7426 SE 27th Street, Suite 200 Mercer Island, W A 98040 June 14, 2004 GEO GROUP NORTHWEST, INC. 13240 NE 20th Street, Suite 12 Bellevue, Washington Phone (425) 649-8757 I I I I I I I I I I I -I I I I I I I I Group Northwest, Inc. June 14,2004 Mr. Steve Friedman Friedman Development, LLC 7426 SE 27th Street, Suite 200 Mercer Island, W A 98040 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Friedman: Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists G-1812 Geo Group Northwest, Inc. conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the proposed Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre development at the McLendon Hardware site in Renton, Washington. The proposed Merrill Gardens development will include a five story retirement center and two- story parking garage. The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site were investigated by drilling three borings to depths of up to 34 feet. The site is underlain by interbedded alluvial soils consisting of silts, sands, and gravels. About 8.5 feet of fill was encountered at the north end of the site. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 17.5 to 22 feet. Based on the standard penetration test blow counts (N-values), soils in the upper 9.5 to 12.5 feet are susceptible to settlement and are not suitable for supporting the building on shallow conventional spread footings or non-structural slab-on-grade floors without improving the bearing capacity of the site soils. Based on the site conditions encountered, the structure(s) may be supported by augercast piles, helical anchors, short aggregate piers (rock column's or Geopiers™), or the unsuitable soils may by removed and replaced with structural fill. Supporting the building on short aggregate piers or over-excavating and replacing the loose soils would allow the building to be supported on conventional spread footings and slab-on-grade floors. Temporary shoring may be required if open cuts are restricted by property lines or if the bearing support of adjacent structures will be compromised. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. 13240 NE 20th Street, Suite 12 • Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone 425/649·8757 • FAX 425/649·8758 I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-1812 Page ii We appreciate this opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services. Should you have any questions regarding this report or need additional consultation during the design and construction phases, please call us. Sincerely, GEO GROUP NORTHWEST, INC. Wade J. Lassey Engineering Geologist I I ~Ilfay William Chang, P .E. I Principal I I I I I I I I Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Project No. G-1812 Page 1 1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES .......................................................... 1 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 2.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 2.3 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ................................................... 3 3.0 SEISMICITY 3.1 LIQUEFACTION.............................................................. 3 3.2 GROUND MOTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 3.3 UBC CLASSIFICATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 4.0 DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL.................................................................. 5 4.2 SITE PREPARATION & GENERAL EARTHWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5 4.2.1 Temporary Erosion Control ................................................. 5 4.2.2 Excavations and Slopes .................................................... 6 4.2.3 Site Soils, Subgrade Stabilization, & Concrete Rubble ............................. 6 4.2.4 Structural Fill ........................................................... 7 4.3 TEMPORARYExCAVATIONSHORING .............................................. 7 4.4 FOUNDATIONS .... : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 4.4.1 Augercast Piles .......................................................... 9 4.4.2 Helical Anchors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10 4.4.3 Short Aggregate Piers. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12 4.4.4 Conventional Spread Footing Foundations ..................................... 12 4.5 PERMANENT BASEMENT WALLS AND RETAINING WALLS ... . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13 4.6 SLAB-ON-GRADE FLOORS .................................................... 14 4.7 DRAINAGE................................................................. 15 4.7.1 Surface Drainage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 15 4.7.2 Footing Drains. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 15 4.7.3 Basement Wall Drainage .................................................. 15 4.8 PAVEMENTS............................................................... 16 5.0 LIMITATIONS ........................................................... 17 6.0 PLAN REVIEW & CONSTRUCTION MONITORING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17 ILLUSTRATIONS: Plate 1 -Vicinity'Map Plate 2 -Site Plan Plate 3 -Footing Drain Detail APPENDIX A: Boring Logs I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED RETIREMENT CENTER McLENDON HARDWARE SITE RENTON, WASHINGTON Project No. G-1812 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The preliminary conceptual site development plan is to construct a five-story wood framed building and two-story parking garage on the site. The parking garage will be attached and incorporated into the eastern portion of the structure. Overall, the proposed building will generally be rectangular in shape and occupy the majority of the width and length of the property. The property measures approximately 120 feet wide east/west and 550 feet long north/south. The main floor of the building will be about the same elevation as the existing site grade and the bottom floor of the parking structure will have a finished floor elevation about 6 feet below grade. 1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of work for this geotechnical study was conducted in general accordance with our proposal dated May 20, 2004 and includes: • Drilling three borings to characterize the subsurface conditions. Record of standard penetration tests (SPT) and collection of soil samples. Analysis of sample moisture content and preparation of boring logs. • Evaluation of the subsurface conditions, engineering analysis, and geotechnical recommendations and design criteria for the proposed five-story retirement center and parking garage. • Preparation of this written report with our activities, findings, conclusions, and geotechnical recommendations. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS G-1812 Page 2 The project site is located at the southeast comer of South Tobin Street and Burnett Avenue South, as indicated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1, in the downtown area of Renton, Washington. The site is currently occupied by the McClendon's Hardware store, McClendon's material storage yard, and paved parking lots. The project site is relatively flat and generally rectangular in shape, measuring approximately 550 feet north/south by 120 feet east/west (1.5 acres). The site is bordered to the east by a paved alley, single family and multifamily residences, and the McLendon's Hardware Store at the southeast comer. McLendon's parking lot is located south of the site. To the north and west are South Tobin Street and Burnett Avenue South, respectively. 2.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS According to the "Preliminaty Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle. King County. Washington," by D. R. Mullineaux, dated 1965 and published by the Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey, the project site is mapped as urban or industrial land modified by widespread or discontinuous artificial fill (afm). The site is located in the Cedar River Valley approximately 200 feet southwest of the Cedar River. The soils along the Cedar River are mapped as alluvium, consisting of interbedded sands, silts, and gravels, derived from the erosion of the upriver glacial deposits. The alluvial soils extend below the mapped modified land and artificial fill within the project site area, based on our review of the subsurface conditions encountered on other nearby projects, including the Williams Condo's to the north and the City of Renton Parking Structure to the south. Geo Group Northwest investigated the subsurface conditions of the project site by drilling three borings on May 26,2004. The borings were located in the middle (Boring B-1), south (Boring B- 2), and north end (Boring B-3) of the property, approximately as shown on the Site Plan, Plate 2. The total depth of the borings varied from 29 to 34 feet. Boring B-1 was drilled between the material storage sheds and was terminated at a depth of 34 feet in dense Sand. Boring B-2 was Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-1812 Page 3 terminated at a depth of30 feet due encountering a naturally deposited wood log that could not be drill through (refusal). Boring B-3 was terminated at a depth of29 feet in a dense soil zone greater than 10 feet in thickness. The soil and groundwater conditions encountered were logged by an engineering geologist from Geo Group Northwest. Standard penetration tests and soil samples were collected at 2.5 to 5 foot intervals, as indicated on the Boring Logs in Appendix A. The Soil samples were analyzed for moisture content in our laboratory and the results are recorded on the Boring Logs. In general, the soils in the upper 9.5 feet to 12.5 feet consist of loose/soft fill and silty alluvial sediments. The fill at the north end of the site was about 8.5 feet thick and contains concrete rubble. Below the upper loose/soft soil zone the soils encountered consisted of medium dense to dense alluvial interbedded silty sands, silts, and gravels. For a more complete description of the soils encountered, please refer to the Boring Logs in Appendix A. 2.3 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Water was encountered below a depth of about 17.5 feet in the middle and southern portion of the site and at a depth of22 feet (±) below the ground surface at the north end of the site. Moderate perched seepage was encountered in the fill at depths of 3 to 5 feet at the north end of the site. Seepage and the groundwater table elevation may fluctuate seasonally depending on the flow and recharge rates of the Cedar River and on precipitation. 3.0 SEISMICITY 3.1 LIQUEFACTION Liquefaction is a phenomenon where loose, granular, cohesionless soil below the water table temporarily loses strength and behaves as a liquid due to strong shaking or vibrations, such as those that occur during earthquakes. Clean, loose and saturated granular soils, such as uniformly graded, fine-grained sands and non-plastic silts that lie within 50 feet of the ground surface are susceptible to liquefaction. The result of soil liquefaction can include ground settlement, sand Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study boils, and lateral spreading. G-1812 Page 4 The site soils below the water table (17.5 feet ±) are medium dense to dense with occasional thin layers of loose Sand and medium stiff Silt. Based on the encountered subsurface site conditions, the liquefaction potential for the site is low due to the medium dense to dense nature of the soils below the water table, the silt content of the soils, and the limited thickness of the loose interbedded saturated sands. 3.2 GROUND MOTION I Based on the subsurface conditions encountered, anticipated damage to the proposed structure would be caused by the intensity and accelerations caused by a strong motion earthquake and not I I I I I I I I I I I by liquefaction or lateral movement of the site soils. The building will be supported on either piles, short aggregate piers, or on suitable bearing soils and no structural mitigation measures are required to address liquefaction or lateral spreading phenomena. 3.3 UBC Classification The 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC), classifies western Washington as Seismic Zone 3 (Figure 16-2), and assigns a Seismic Zone Factor, Z, of 0.30 (Table 16-1). The site soils encountered best correspond to a Soil Profile Type of SD -Stiff Soil Profile Type (Table 16-1). Based on a Seismic Zone Factor (Z) of OJ and a Soil Profile Type of So, the Seismic Coefficient Ca is 0.36 (Table 16-Q) and the Seismic Coefficient Cv is 0.54 (Table 16-R) for the site. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study 4.0 DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL G-1812 Page 5 Building column loads of200 to 350 Kips, with short-term seismic loads up to 400 Kips, are anticipated, based on preliminary calculations by the structural engineer, Mr. Mark Moorleghen of DCI Engineers. Based on the subsurface conditions, the proposed buildings may be supported on concrete piles, helical anchors, short aggregate piers (also referred to as GeopiersTM or Stone Columns), or the unsuitable soils may be over-excavated and replaced with structural fill or lean- mix concrete. Over-excavation will require temporary shoring if IH: 1 V open cuts can not be made due to property line or other restraints. The parking garage will be excavated to a depth of about 8 feet and temporary shoring may be required. Structural fill below the foundation elements should extend down and out from the footings creating a IH:2V structural prism below the footings. This will require a wider excavation which could encroach beyond the property line(s). Temporary shoring should be designed for an over- excavation depth of up to 13 feet. It may be feasible to incorporate sections of the shoring piles into the perimeter support for building if the shoring is structurally designed as such. Slab-on-grade floors for the building and parking garage should be structurally supported if the building is pile or helical anchor supported. Regular non-structural floor slabs may be used if the subgrade is improved with short aggregate piers or the loose/soft soil encountered in the upper 10 feet (±) is replaced with structural fill. 4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND GENERAL EARTHWORK 4.2.1 Temporary Erosion Control The site soils are moisture sensitive and temporary erosion control measures, such as perimeter silt fencing, should be installed prior to the start of grading and construction. Filtration fabric sock should be installed in the stormwater catchbasins adjacent to the site. A crushed rock construction entrance may be required to mitigate the tracking of mud on the street. Exposed site soils should be covered with straw mulch during wet weather and surface runoff should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled into excavation areas. During wet weather it may be necessary to Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study cover cut slopes with plastic sheeting to minimize erosion. 4.2.2 Excavations and Slopes G-1812 Page 6 Temporary open cuts may be used excavate for the parking garage or to over-excavate and replace the unsuitable soils in the top 10 feet, provided there is available space or a temporary encroachment agreement with the adjacent property owners is obtained. The stability of temporary cut slopes is a function of many factors, including soil type, geometry, surcharge loads, amount of time the cut is open, and the presence of subsurface seepage. It is the responsibility of the contractor to maintain safe slope configurations. Excavations should not intrude into a IH: 1 V imaginary plane extending below the foundations of the adjacent buildings starting 5 feet out from the building. If groundwater seepage is encountered, excavation of cut slopes should be halted and the stability of the cut slope evaluated by the geotechnical engineer. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in depth should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than IH: 1 V (Horizontal:Vertical). If cuts of this inclination or less and greater than four (4) in height can not be made due to property line or other restraints then temporary shoring will be required. Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H: 1 V. 4.2.3 Site Soils, Subgrade Stabilization & Concrete Rubble The site soils contain silt, are moisture sensitive, and should not be used as structural fill unless approved by the geotechnical engineer. During wet weather protection of the subgrade may be required to provide a stable subgrade for drilling and construction equipment. It may be necessary to cover the site with two to four-inch size crushed rock or recycled concrete to provide a stable subgrade base for the contractors. Subgrade stabilization recommendations should be provided by geotechnical engineer based on the site conditions. In Boring B-3 at the north end of the site, the fill was about 8.5 feet thick and the concrete rubble was encountered at a depth of 4 to 6 feet. The extent and condition of the fill may vary and removal of the rubble may be required prior to or during the drilling of piles. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study 4.Z.4 Structural Fill G-1812 Page 7 Fill material used to support building foundations, slab-on-grade floors, pavements and sidewalks should meet the requirements for structural fill. We recommend using imported granular soils for structural fill, such as a sand and gravel pit-run. During dry weather, any compactable non- organic soil may be used as structural fill, provided the material is near the optimum moisture content for compaction purposes and achieves the compaction specifications. During wet weather, material to be used as structural fill should have the following specifications: 1. Be free draining, granular material, which contains no more than 5 percent fines (silt and clay-size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve); 2. Be free of organic and other deleterious substances; 3. Have a maximum size of three-inches. Structural fill material should be placed at or near the materials optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is the water content in soil that enables the soil to be compacted to the highest dry density for a given compaction effort. Structural fill should be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding 10-inches in loose thickness. Under building foundations and slab- on-grade floors, structural fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent maximum density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91 (Modified Proctor). Under pavements structural fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent maximum dry density, with the exception of the top 12-inches which should be compacted to at least 95 percent maximum dry density. We recommend granular fill materials be compacted with vibratory compaction equipment, such as a vibratory drum roller or hoe-pack. 4.3 TEMPORARY EXCAVATION SHORING Temporary excavation shoring may be needed to support the excavation along the property lines to prevent encroachment onto the neighboring property or prevent excavation impacts to the building foundations on the adjoining properties. Temporary excavation shoring may consist of a cantilever soldier pile and lagging wall. Where the excavation limits are setback from the property lines, it may be possible to limit the height of Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-1812 Page 8 the shoring by using aIR: 1 V inclined open cut above the shoring. The shoring should be monitored and, if applicable, the adjacent building monitored for movement during construction by surveying select points on a weekly basis. Prior to the start of construction, the adjacent buildings, pavements, and sidewalks should be surveyed and any cracks, sags, or other damage documented to protect against unwarranted damage claims. A cantilever soldier pile and lagging wall may be economical for temporary shoring walls up to 12 feet (±) in height. Soldier piles are first installed by setting and grouting steel beams in pre-drilled holes. If the piles extend below the water table the holes should be drilled using the augercast method which allows the hole to be filled with cement grout as the auger is extracted to minimize groundwater intrusion and prevent collapse of the hole. The site excavation in front of the wall would then be carried out in about 4-foot excavation lifts to allow installation of timber lagging behind the soldier piles. Shoring Design Criteria: Active Soil Pressure 35 pcf equivalent fluid weight for level ground behind the wall. (Add lOR psffor permanent shoring seismic considerations) Allowable Passive Soil Pressure: 300 pcf equivalent fluid pressure above the water table and 200 pcf equivalent fluid pressure below the water table The active soil pressure should act on one pile-spacing above the excavation line and one pile- diameter below. To counter the active soil pressure, the allowable passive soil pressure below the excavation line acting on one pile-spacing or two pile-diameters, whichever is less, may be used. For sloped ground behind the wall, a surcharge load equivalent to 50 percent of the soil height above the wall should be considered in addition to the above active soil pressure. Traffic and adjacent building surcharges should also be accounted for. Due to soil arching effects, timber lagging for the temporary shoring system should consist of pressure treated timber designed to resist 50 percent of the apparent lateral soil pressure. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study 4.4 FOUNDATIONS G-1812 Page 9 Loose/soft soils that could settle under load are present in the upper 9.5 feet to 12.5 feet of the site. The following options may be considered for supporting the building structure: 1. Augercast piles 2. Helical anchors 3. Short aggregate piers 4. Over-excavation and replacement with structural fill or lean-mix concrete 4.4.1 Augercast Piles Augercast piles may be used to transfer the building loads through the loose sands and soft silts, into the denser sand, silt, and gravel alluvial material. The following table provides allowable axial and lateral loading for piles of varying diameter and length. The size, number, spacing, steel reinforcement, and grade beam requirements should be designed by the structural engineer. The following recommended allowable design parameters assume that the pile caps are tied together with grade beams and the piles are adequately reinforced to resist shear loads. Pile Pile Pile Allowable Lateral Allowable Allowable Diameter Length Embedment Load for 114 inch Axial Loading Uplift (inches) (feet) (feet Deflection (tons) (tons) (tons) 14 20 10 2 35 17.5 30 20 2 54 27 16 20 10 2.5 44 22 30 20 2.5 67 33.5 I 18 20 10 3 54 27 30 20 3 81 40.5 24 20 10 4 92 46 10 70 4 111 tlh" Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-1812 Page 10 No reduction in pile capacity is required if the pile spacing is at least three times the pile diameter. A one-third increase in the above allowable pile capacities can be used when considering short- term transitory wind or seismic loads. Lateral forces can also be resisted by the passive earth pressures acting on the grade beams, and friction between the grade beams and the subgrade. To fully mobilize the passive pressure resistance, the grade beams must be poured "neat" against compacted fill. Our recommended allowable passive soil pressure for lateral resistance is 300 pcf equivalent fluid weight. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used between the subgrade and the grade beams. Anticipated post-construction settlement of augercast pile supported structures will generally be on the order of 1/2 inch or less, with similar differential settlement across the building width. The performance of piles depends on how and to what bearing stratum the piles are installed. It is critical that judgement and experience be used as a basis for determining the embedment length and acceptability of each pile. Therefore, we recommend that Geo Group Northwest, Inc. be retained to monitor the pile installation operation, collect and interpret installation data, and verify suitable bearing stratum. 4.4.2 Helical Anchors Helical anchors, developed by the A. B. Chance Company and Atlas Systems, Inc., consist ofa steel square shaft with one or more helices on the anchor shaft. Vertical bearing and tensile capacities have been calculated for three different helical anchor designs: a single 8-inch helix anchor, a single 10-inch helix anchor, and a multiple helix anchor. The multiple helix anchor, Chance Anchor C150 0007 or Atlas AHP-150-8/1O/12, consists of one 8-, 10-, and 12-inch diameter helix spaced three-diameters apart. Vertically installed helical anchors provide negligible la~eral resistance for wind and seismic loading. Lateral loads can be resisted by installing additional helical anchors at an inclination of 30 degrees with respect to the vertical. The following table contains the allowable theoretical calculated capacities for helical anchors installed at an inclination of 90 a with respect to the horizontal, with a minimum embedment length of 12 feet below the surface, and with a factor of safety of2 with respect to the ultimate capacity. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-1812 Page 11 The ultimate capacity for helical anchors should be determined and verified in the field based on the installation torque. The calculated theoretical allowable capacities are applicable for both compression and tension. Allowable Theoretical Vertical Bearing (Compressive) and Tensile Load (Shear) Capacity of Helical Anchor Installation 12 Inch 14 Inch 10-12 Inch 8-10-12 Inch Depth to Diameter Diameter Diameter Diameter Largest Helix Single Helix· Single Helix· Double Helix· Triple Helix· 12 feet 10.2 tons 12.7 tons 17.3 tons 2l.8 tons 15 feet 12.8 tons 15.9 tons 21.7 tons 27.4 tons *The factored nominal loads must not exceed the anchor design strengths. Design strengths for multiple helix Chance Anchors have maximum design strengths of up to 50 kips (25 tons), or less, as noted in Tables 1 and 2 ofICBO Evaluation Report No. ER-511O. The ultimate capacity for helical anchors should be determined and verified in the field based on the installation torque and test loading of a minimum of three piles to verify the calculated bearing capacity. For Chance helical anchors, the ultimate capacity can be determined by the following empirical relationship: QULT = Kt * T where: ~ is the empirical factor (= 10 ft-l for square shaft anchors)~ and T is the installation torque. The allowable capacity of the Chance helical anchor may also be developed when sufficient torque is recorded during installation. For example, based on the empirical correlation developed by the A. B. Chance Company, an installation torque of 4,000 ft-Ibs roughly correlates to an ultimate capacity of 20 tons. The allowable capacity for the installed anchor with a factor of safety of 2 with respect to its ultimate capacity is approximately 10 tons. Lateral forces exerted parallel to the slope face can be resisted by grade beams. The grade beams should form a lattice arrangement to minimize lateral movements of the structure. Alternatively, Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-1812 Page 12 additional inclined helical anchors can be installed perpendicular to the first set of inclined anchors in order to minimize lateral movements. 4.4.3 Short Aggregate Piers Highly compacted short aggregate piers may be used to stiffen the upper soft/loose soils and allow conventional spread footing foundations to be supported on the short aggregate piers with tolerable settlements. Geopiers™ is a patented ground improvement method, developed as an alternative to deep pile foundations, preloading, and the over-excavation/replacement technique commonly utilized to improve bearing soils beneath shallow foundations. Short aggregate piers are installed by drilling a pattern of holes below footings and slab-on-grade floors to create vertical columns. Short aggregate piers are typically 2 to 3 feet in diameter. The height of an aggregate pier is typically two to three times its diameter or width, and typically covers 25 to 35 percent of the foundation contact area. The soils at the bottom of the pier are first densified by impacting them with a hydraulic tamper that utilizes a beveled head. Crushed aggregate is then placed and compacted in thin lifts to create an aggregate column. The tamping process pre- stresses the soil vertically and horizontally resulting in an enhanced matrix soil. The stiflhess and support capacity of the soil is significantly improved and the effect of the structural loads are therefore reduced. Based on project histories, building settlements can be reduced to one inch, or less to achieve allowable bearing capacities in the range of3,000 psfto 5,000 psf Short aggregate pier design requires engineering to determine the size, height and spacing requirements within acceptable settlement limits. Engineering is typically provided by the pier contractor. 4.3.4 Conventional Spread Footing Foundations The building( s) may be supported on conventional spread footings consisting of individual column/pier footings and/or strip footings if the building foundations are supported on structural fill or lean-mix that extends down to suitable bearing soils or if foundations are supported on short aggregate piers. We recommend the following spread footing design parameters: • Allowable bearing pressure, including all dead and live loads -Structural fill, lean-mix, short aggregate piers Geo Group Northwest, Inc. = 3,000 psf I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study • Minimum depth to bottom of perimeter footing below adjacent final exterior grade • Minimum depth to bottom of interior footings below top of parking slab • Minimum width of wall footings • Minimum lateral dimension of column footings • Estimated post-construction settlement: = = = = G-1812 Page 13 18 inches 18 inches 16 inches 24 inches Over-excavation & replacement with structural fill or lean-mix = 112 inch -Short Aggregate Piers: To be determined by pier designer • Estimated post-construction differential settlement across building width: Over-excavation & replacement with structural fill or lean-mix = 112 inch -Short Aggregate Piers: To be determined by pier designer A one-third increase in the allowable bearing pressures can be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads can also be resisted by friction between the foundation and the supporting subgrade or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. For the latter, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the existing undisturbed soil or backfilled with a compacted structural fill. For lateral pressure considerations, we recommend a passive pressure of300 pcfequivalent fluid weight and a coefficient offriction of 0.35. 4.5 PERMANENT BASEMENT AND CONVENTIONAL RETAINING WALLS Basement and retaining walls restrained horizontally on top are considered unyielding and should be designed for a lateral soil pressure under the at-rest condition~ while conventional reinforced concrete walls free to rotate on top should be designed for an active lateral soil pressure. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study Active Earth Pressure G-1812 Page 14 Conventional reinforced concrete walls that are designed to yield an amount equal to 0.002 times the wall height, should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of35 pcffor level backfill above the wall. At-Rest Earth Pressure Walls supported horizontally by floor slabs are considered unyielding and should be designed for lateral soil pressure under the at-rest condition. The design lateral soil pressure should have an equivalent fluid pressure of 50 pcffor level ground behind unyielding walls. Traffic and planter loads, if applicable, should be considered in addition to the above soil pressures. Recommended passive and base coefficient of friction: Passive Earth Pressure • 300 pcf equivalent fluid weight Base Coefficient of Friction • 0.30 The walls should be drained to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure. We recommend using a vertical drain mat and granular free-draining backfill material to facilitate drainage as discussed in the Drainage section. 4.6 SLAB-ON-GRADE FLOORS If the building is supported on augercast piles, it will be necessary to structurally support the bottom floor slab with the grade beams that span between the augercast piles. If the slab subgrade soils are improved by installing short aggregate piers or over-excavating and replacing the unsuitable soils, a regular non-structural floor slab may be used. Slab-on-grade floors underlying heated living areas, utility rooms, and dry storage space should be poured on top of a capillary break to mitigate the wicking of moisture up through the soils to the slab. The capillary break should consist of a minimum of six (6) inch thick layer of free-draining gravel containing no more than five (5) percent finer than NO.4 (l/4-inch) sieve, or clean crushed Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-18l2 Page 15 rock. To reduce water vapor transmission through the slab we recommend installing a 10-mil reinforced vapor barrier between the capillary break and concrete floor slab, such as Moistop® by Fortifiber Corporation. Two to four inches of sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction. 4.7 DRAINAGE 4.7.1 Surface Drainage The finished ground at the site should be graded such that surface water is directed away from the building structure. Water should not be allowed to stand in areas where footings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. 4.7.2 Footing Drains We recommend that footing drains be installed around the perimeter foundation. The drains should consist of a four (4) inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at or near the bottom of the footings or 'grade beams with a gradient sufficient to generate flow, as illustrated on Plate 3, Drainage Detail. The drain line should be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining rock or free-draining granular material. The drain rock and drain line should be surrounded by a geotextile filter fabric, Mirafi 140N or equivalent. Roof drains should be separately tightlined to discharge into the storm water collection system and should not be connected to the footing drain system. Cleanouts should be installed to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drains and roof downspout tightline systems. 4.7.3 Basement Wall Drainage The exterior of basement walls (parking garage) should be sealed and a vertical drain mat installed, such as Miradrain 6000 or equivalent, to facilitate drainage. The drain mat should extend from the finished surface grade, down to the footing drain pipe and be secured to the wall. The top of the drain mat should be pinned to the wall with a bar to prevent backfill soils from entering between the wall and drain mat. Backfill the wall with a granular material, such as a pit- run gravelly sand and compact to a minimum of90 percent of the materials maximum dry density. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-1812 Page 16 The top twelve (12) inches of backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil. This cap material can be separated from the underlying more granular drainage material by a layer of geotextile. 4.8 PAVEMENTS The adequacy of a pavement performance is strictly related to the condition of the underlying soil subgrade and rock base material. If this is inadequate, no matter what pavement section is constructed, settlement or movement of the subgrade will be reflected up through the paving. In order to avoid this situation, we recommend the subgrade be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. Areas of soft, wet, or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. If so, over-excavation of the unsuitable materials and their replacement with a compacted structural fill or crushed rock may be required. The pavement section design should consist of the following minimum material thicknesses: A. Class "B" Asphalt Concrete Over 3/4-Inch Minus Crushed Rock Base B. Reinforced Concrete Slab Over 3/4-Inch Minus Crushed Rock Base Min. Thickness 3 -inches 6 -inches 6 -inches 4 -inches The minimum material thicknesses may not be acceptable if there is evidence of instability in the subgrade. In the event of poor, yielding, or unstable subgrade conditions, Geo Group Northwest should be requested to review the site conditions and provide subgrade stabilization recommendations. Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I June 14, 2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study 5.0 LIMITATIONS G-1812 Page 17 This report has been prepared for the specific application to the subject project site, for the exclusive use of Friedman Development and the project design team. The findings and recommendations stated herein are based on our field observations, the subsurface conditions encountered in our site exploration, our experience, and judgement. The recommendations are . our professional opinion derived in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area and within the budget constraint. No warranty is expressed or implied. In the event that soil conditions vary during site work, Geo Group Northwest, Inc. should be notified and the recommendations herein re-evaluated, and where necessary, be revised. 6.0 PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING It is recommended that we be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork, foundation, and other recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and engineering plan documents. It is recommended that we be retained to provide geotechnical monitoring services during construction. This will allow us to confirm that the subsurface conditions are consistent with those described in this report and allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions diff~r from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. It will allow us to evaluate whether the erosion control, earthwork, and foundation construction activities conform to the intent of the contract plans and specifications. While on the site during construction, we will not direct or supervise the contractor or the contractors work, nor will we be responsible for providing or reviewing on-site safety or dimensional measurements. INSPECTIONS The following items should be inspected by the geotechnical engineering firm during construction: • Installation of piles, anchors, and piers for foundation support; • Installation of shoring; Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !I I I I June 14,2004 Merrill Gardens at Renton Centre Geotechnical Engineering Study G-1812 Page 18 • Excavation and subgrade improvement, including installation of short aggregate piers; • Structural fill placement and compaction testing; • Soil bearing verification for spread footing foundations and slab-on-grade floors; • Subsurface drainage installation; • Subgrade preparation for pavements, proof-rolling, and subgrade stabilization The contractor should provide a minimum of 24 hours advance notice to perform the above inspections so that we can arrange to have personnel available. We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this geotechnical engineering study. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this report or if additional information is needed. ,., " Respectfully Submitted, GEO GROUP NORTHWEST, INC. /d .. '-.~ Wade J. Lassey Engineering Geologist ~~~ Principal Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I ILLUSTRATIONS I G-1812 I I I I I I I I I I I I Geo Group Northwest, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • GrouGo~oo~,~~,~:!,~: •. ~nc. E"nvironrrental Scientists SCALE 1"=1500' DATE 6/11/04 MADE WJL o 1500' 3000' Approximate Scale: 1 Inch =1500 feet VICINITY MAP MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE RENTON WASHINGTON CHKD we JOB NO. G-1812 PLATE 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I .., r-. , I n, r"""""I £K~-r ~H\t~""b ~~u .. r ,...., r r-1 'I I l~c...ItIWl-rF ~c;r r-e a~A-1N At 6fC-6t 7,.../2 ~ ~. -= I ~ /' I i. . ~.._.:= l' , p' '" '-'''' "---' I _n ---.:; I e:}L(...~-r t.c:>-r ~ ----.-=-~-..-- LEGEND ~ BORING NUMBER & ~-1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION This site plan adapted from a Site Sketch by Curtis Beattie Architects SCALE As Shown ~--~.- Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists, & Environrrental Scientists DATE 6/11/04 I MADE WJL CBKD ~ ...........-........... o 10' 20' Approx. Scale: 1 inch = 100 feet SITE PLAN ME~LGARDENSATRENTONCENTRE RENTON WASHINGTON we JOB NO. G-1812 PLATE 2 ti I 1" 3/4" SQUARES SPACED -3/4" AS INDICA TED -HT. 1/8" 1" RAISE-1/2" WIDE BORDER 12"¢ FIBER JOINT PACKING 2'-0" CONCRETE CLASS 3000 4-3/4" 45' (1/8) BEND ~ CAST IRON RING AND COVER ~ IN UNIMPROVED AREAS POUR 1'-0" THICK PIPE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER 2'-0" SQUARE CONCReTE, CLASS 3000, PAD AROUND RING AND COVER. IN ASPHALT ROADWAYS RESTORE AROUND CLEANOUT RING AND COVER AS REQUIRED BY STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING BR36. 4" CLEANQUT WYE WlTI-l 45' BEND AND PLUG. ~I ~I 1;:' ~. ffi' ~I ... 0 HOUSE HOUSE 8'1 ," SURFACE 1,..-CLEANOUT - '/lYE 4" CLEAN OUT 1 WYE WlTI-l PLUG .. -.~ \1 ~ HOUSE 4" SEWER PIPE (T"lPICAL) 4" lEST lEE WIlli PLUG FACE UP (TYPICAL) ~I ~. ... ~1 J,; S"x 4" REDUCER (!) (TYPICAL) i'i ~ ~ ALL 90' TURNS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MEANS OF A WYE AND 45' BEND. ~~---+.t TWO 45' BENDS SHALL NOr BE ACCEPTABLE. HOUSE 4" SEWER PIPE, SEE NOlES 2 AND 3. r.lINJMUM LINE SIZE FOR OTI-lER THAN SINGLE FAMILY 1S 6" PROPERTY UNE TYPICAL BUILDING SEWER INSTALLATION PLAN ~'RE"OVE 2"x4" STUD AND CAP OR PLUG ON END OR EXISTING 6" SEWER PIPE. ANO INSTAll BUILDING SEWER COUPLINGS, REDUCER. TEES, AND BENDS AS REQUIRED. SEE SIDE SEWER DETAIL 6" PIPING TO 6'-0" BEYOND PROPERTY LINE 6" SIDE OURET TEE SEE NOTE 6 SE'M:R MAIN eJ.6.t:!. BUILDING S['NER INSTALLATION IF THE BUILDING SEWER SERVES ANY FIXlURE HA'v1NG flOOD LEva RIMS LOCATED BELOW 'THE ELEVATION OF TI-lE NEXT UPSTREAM MANHOLE COVER OF THE PUBUC SEWER SYSTEM, A BACKFlOW PREVENTION DEVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED EQUAL TO TYPER 2-84, PLAN BUILDING DRAIN fOR LOW HOUSE CALL FOR LOCATIONS BEFORE YOU DIG 48HR LOCATORS 1-800-424-5555 PLUG TO BE SEALED IN SAME MANNER AS MAIN SEWER JOINTS. 8 INCH OR 8 INCH CLEAN-OUT e ADOPTED CIrl'or _ DWO. NAME: BW18B NOTES: SP PAGE: 8076 1, Pdor to installation of " 50nltory sewer connection, o atde-lIcYfef" permit mU'5t be purc;ho!lcd from the! City of Renton Public Works Deportment. 2. Types of pipe and flttingll thQt oem be used for eonltory sewers 8htll! be approved by the Deportment of Public Work,. Rubber or neoprene goskatQ as ap&elDed by the monufocturer, shall be UBllld on join-is. J. A. minimum grGde ot 2" (1/4" per foot) must be mointalne<i wlth 4~ pipe. In the event a 2X lrode connot be maintained. Th!! owner mU3t gnm 0 Sfode roloa:!o to tho City arid thon con Inswll • plpo <It II grade of 1"- 4. For In~p':!tltJQrJ of oldo 011 .... 81'. CQII 24 hourll In odvnnc", 277-5570. SIIIl mUlt be ready for Il'\spec~lon and repr~s:entative 01'\ aite when inapector arrivea <.:II appointed timo. SIde oewer and stub sholl bill tlsted plr Cit! speclfleot!ons. Moks thQ connection a the houle. Do nol backfill the dItch until approval Is gIVen by the Inspector. Flnol a[>IJrovul will be gronted oft8l' thll existing septic hmk has bllen pumped out and filled wlth BOnd. S, Install "lila 81Iwer .... lth 2' minimum cover. 18" eaver hI ullowed at th8 hou88 If outlet Ie IIhollaw. 6. [f side silwer stub Is not QVQllablll. The owner sholl be reapQnslble for Its Inatallation. The aide lewer sholl bll u minimum 01 6" In size. If tee III not ovullablo. the main sewer 11M must be topped thru 0 cost Iron stlddle. All work within street right-at-way sholl be done by a licensed and bonded contractor. 7. All work sholl be occompliaheQ in oocordonce with thll Washington Indudrlo1 Sofety om:! Heolth Act. (YilSHA) a. All trGflch restoraUon for side sewors If! !hs pub1lc rlght-of-.... ay sholl confann to thll most current trench restorotillfl requirements os shoWIl on dwg. IHR-2J. 9. All building ,ewer and elde "wers shall have bedding In accordance with drawln9 BW18C Qr BR09 (III applicable. 10. Thorll shall be a mln1mum 10 foot hOl'I~Olltol eeperoUon blllwecn sanitary !llde SeoWllrlII 1:1I1d w-ater !leNiC(!1!l and a minimum 5 foot hlXi~antal IIlIpllroUon bl'twllen I5Onlt'lry sldll sewers and .iill. other utllltlo!l. -TYPICAL BUlLDING SEWER - SIDE SEWER (PROPERTY LINE) TO BUlLDING CONNEC'l'lON INSTALLATION PLAN ADOPTED CIrl'orDftlllf IIWIIWIDPLAIIII 1a'I_12/18 DWG. NAME: BR35 SP PAGE:BOB2 Z ::t i'-PROPERTY LINE 6'-0" b FUTURE ~~~~~:6='='~B~U~IL~D=IN~G==S~EWE:=R==P=IP=E==~====='~~~~~============~==~c:B~U~ILD __ IN __ G S __ EWE __ R 1:3:5 MIX CONCRETE BLOCKING 6" MIN. TEE WITH 6" SIDE OUTLET 6" SIDE SEWER AND BUILDING SEWER 60" ALLOWABLE MAX. FOR CAST IRON PIFE OR DUCTILE IRON PIPE. 6" SIDE OUTLET TEE SEWER MAIN IsEWER MAIN w. z ~I ",. ~. ~I HORIZONTAL 2"x 4" STUD SERVICE MARKER PAINT UPPER PORTION WHITE ANS STENCIL ON SIDE WORDING "SEWER" WITH 3" HIGH BLACK LETTERS. AND #6 WIRE WRAPPED AROUND THE STUD AND EXTENDED TO THE TOP OF THE STUD. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY, MAKE TAP THROUGH CAST IRON SADDLE SECURED TO SEWER MAIN WITH STAINLESS STEEL BANDS WHEN CONNECTING NEW SIDE SEWERS TO EXISTING MAIN. VITRIFIED CLAY, PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE, 01 PIPE AND C1 PIPE SEWER MAINS ARE TO BE CORE DRILLED CONCRETE BLOCKING ANGLE OF TEE AT MAIN OVER 25 ElEYATION lYPICAL SIDE SEWER ELEVATION NOTE: STANDARD SIDE SEWER INSTALLATION (SEWD. IWN TO PROPERTY LINE) UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWIN ON PLAN, SIDE SEWER SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2.5' COVER LINE OR 3-5' LOWER THAN THE LOWEST HOUSE ELEVATION, WHICHEVER IS LOWER. AT PROPERTY e~~-~ BDl"MPD PWI8 BACKFILL MATERIAL - W (SEE NOTE 4) --V-LIMITS OF PIPE ZONE (SEE NOTE 5) -----''' i" CONCRETE CLASS C (SEE NOTE 8) FOUNDATION LEVEL 0~~~ '\ ~~_:. )b. BACKFILL MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 5) --, BEDDING MATERIAL FOR RIGID PIPE (SEE NOTE 6) -~ FOUNDATION LEVEL BEDDING MATERIAL FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE (SEE NOTE 7) -~ FOUNDATION LEVEL (CLASS A DESIGN) W (SEE NOTE 4) (CLASS B, C, D, DESIGN) BEDDING FOR RIGID PIPE (CLASS F DESIGN) BEDDING FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE I B . 1 LIMITS OF PIPE ZONE LIMITS OF PIPE ZONE 1a'I_12/18 CWO. NAME: BI~39 SP PAGE: B078 NOTES: 1. PROVIDE UNIFORM SUPPORT UNDER BARREL. 2. HAND TAMP UNDER HAUNCHES. 3. COMPACT BEDDING MATERIAL TO 95% MAX. DENSITY EXCEPT DIRECRY OVER PIPE. HAND TAMP ONLY. 4. SEE "EXCAVATlON AND PREPARATlON OF lRENCH" IN THE SANITARY SEWERS SECnON OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICTATlONS FOR lRENCH \\IDTH "w" AND lRENCHING OpnONS. THE PIPE ZONE WILL BE THE AClUAL TRENCH 'MOTH, EXCEPT FOR CLASS A BEDDING. THE MINIMUM CONCRETE \\10TH SHALL BE 1-1/2 1.0. + 18". 5. lRENCH BACKFILL SHALL CONFORM TO "BACKFlLLlNG SEWER lRENCHES" IN THE SANITARY SEWERS SECTION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT THAT ROCKS OR LUMPS LARGER THAN 1" PER FOOT Of PIPE DlAME'TER SHALL NOT BE USED IN THE BACKFILL MATERIAL. 6. SEE "BEDDING MATERIAL FOR RIGID PIPE" IN THE AGGREGATES SEcnON OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. 7. SEE "BEDDING MATERIAL FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE" IN THE AGGREGATES SECTION OF STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR THE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. 8. PIPE MUST BE ANCHORED IN SUCH A MANER AS TO ENSURE FLOW LINE IS MAINTAINED. BEDDING CLASS DESIGN DIMENSION CLASS A CLASS B CLASS C CLASS D CLASS F .. 4" MIN. A 1/4 1.0. • 12" MAX. B 1/4 0.0. 1/2 0.0. C 3/4 0.0. 1/2 0.0. .. A "" 4" MIN. 27" I,D, AND UNDER 6" MIN. OVER 27" !.D. • ZERO • 1/8 0.0. ZERO 0.0. 1/B 0.0. 0.0. -- PIPE BEDDING FOR SANITARY SEWER ® :!::: UII' _4/17 DWG. NAME: BW18C SP PAGE: B077 DESIGNED _J::::M=..S __ ~~---------------------------------------------------r-----r----+----t Engineering Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. DATE DRAWN ..:.FP.:..:.H'--___ 1---+---------------------+--1--1---1 750 Sixth Street South PH: (425) 827-2014 Kirkland, WA 98033 1-800-945-8408 www.paceengrs.cam FA'" (425) 827-5043 FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 1018 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 rnTm7:--------t SCALE CHECKED -,J""M,,-S __ Kirkland • Seattle " JUNE, 2004 AS NOTED SANITARY SEWER NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS 1. ALL WORK MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF RENTON UTILITY DEPARTMENT AND THE LATEST EDITION OF THE WSDOT/APWA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE HOURS OF WORK IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE LIMITED TO 8:30 A.M. TO 3: 30 P.M. ON WEEKDAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AT 235-2620. ALL STREET CLOSURES, PARTIAL OR FULL, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND 911 SHALL BE NOTIFIED 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION" PREPARED BY WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION, LATEST EDITION (APWA) AND CITY OF RENTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 4. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TRUE AND CORRECT LOCATION SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. 5. A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND A 24 HOUR NOTICE SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO STARTING NEW CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. (INSPECTION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF RENTON). IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BACKFILLING ALL CONSTRUCTION. 6. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS, METHODS AND SEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION AND FOR THE SAFETY OF WORKERS AND OTHERS ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE AND ANY OTHER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 8. PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER PLANS. 9. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY OF RENTON WITH AN AS-BUILT DRAWING OF THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WHICH HAS BEEN STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR. 11. BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED EQUALLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PIPE IN LAYERS WITH A LOOSE AVERAGE DEPTH OF 6 INCHES, MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 8 INCHES, THOROUGHLY TAMPING EACH LAYER TO 95 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DENSITY. THESE COMPACTED LAYERS MUST EXTEND FOR ONE PIPE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE OR TO THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH. MATERIALS TO COMPLETE THE FILL OVER PIPE SHALL BE THE SAME AS DESCRIBED. 12. OPEN CUT ROAD CROSSINGS FOR UTILITY TRENCHES ON EXISTING TRAVELED ROADWAY SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH CRUSHED ROCK AND MECHANICALLY COMPACTED. CUTS INTO THE EXISTING ASPHALT SHALL BE NEATLINE CUT WITH SAW IN A CONTINUOUS LINE. A TEMPORARY MIX PATCH MUST BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILL AND COMPACTION. A PERMANENT HOT MIX PATCH SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN TEN DAYS AND SHALL BE PER CITY OF RENTON CURRENT STANDARDS. 13. DATUM SHALL BE CITY OF RENTON, U.S.C. AND G.S .. 14. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DEPARTMENT FOR THE PREVENTION OF ON- SITE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 15. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7-02.3(1) OF THE CURRENT STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE NECESSARY LEVELING OF THE TRENCH BOTTOM OR THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL AS WELL AS PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BEDDING MATERIAL TO UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PIPE WILL BE SUPPORTED ON A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE PEA GRAVEL 6" ABOVE AND BELOW THE PIPE. 16. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) RUBBER GASKETED ASTM D 3034, SDR 35, OR DUCTILE IRON CLASS 50. 17. IN UNIMPROVED AREAS, MANHOLE TO EXTEND MINIMUM 6 INCH AND MAXIMUM 18 INCH ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. IN PAVED AREA, COVER MUST SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS TO MATCH PAVING. • ., PERMIT DRAWINGS MERRILL GARDEN SAT REN TON CEN TRE SANITARY SEWER NOTES & DETAILS JOB NUMBER 04441.00 SHEET C4.1 OF --~---~ ---~------~~ ----~- HORIZONT Ai. DATUM CITY OF RENlON, NAD 83/91 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. BASED ON HORIZONTAL CONTROl .. POINTS 205 AND 1887. POINT 205 BEtNG k MON IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF BURNETT AVE AND 2ND ST,; POINT 1887 BINING A BRASS PLUG AT THE INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND WELLS AVE. VERTICAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON, NAVD 88 BASED ON CITY VERTICAL CONTROL MARK NUMBER 1939 WITH A PUBLISHED ELEVATION OF 11.383 METERS. 11.383 METERS x 39.37/12=37.345 FEET. }', I , en \, " ' i . I' I. i l !r ti ! ~ \ :,. I i· ' .. , ,. ~STRUCTION NOTES: (1) WET TAP EXISTING 24" DI MAIN PER CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS. INSTALL 6" TAPPING lEE AND 6" TAPPING GATE VALVE. (i) !)5 _ LF . 6" . DL tFlRE) •. @ FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION AND PIV MOUNTED ON BUILDING WALL SEE PLUMBING PL.ANS FOR CONNECTION. @ 2" DOMESTIC METER AND SERVICE. @ CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN PER CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS. 6" IE=34.10 (VERIFY). ® 147 LF 6" PVC SIDE SEWER, S=2.0%. (l) GREASE INTERCEPTOR. @ CONNECT TO KITCHEN PLUMBING. 6" IE=37.20 ® 6" PVC SEWER STUB. IE=34.65. ® ClEAN OUT PER CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS. -"'~ . --C, •.• ') -I DESIGNED ..:J=MB=--_I-_t--------------.------t---j---j---J DRAWN -,FP~H,--_ 1 __ +--------------·------j---t--t--1 CHECKED _J!!,,!M!!.B __ .j_ ............. . -,. -,-" .-.--,:.~) _ .. _._---, , , . Sr) t"·r.--,,~I·1t . .') ... 1'/ I , , '" THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBlE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCA'lION, DIMENSION. AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTiUTIES 'MiETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT BY POTHOUNG THE UTIU'lIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VER'lICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCllON. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTIU)'Y LOCATE 0 1-800-424-5555 AND THEN POTHOUNG ALL OF THE EXISTlNQUTlUTIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTIUTY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFUCTS EXIST. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT PACE ENGINEERING TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. Engineering, Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 Sixth Street South PH, (425) 827-2014 Kirkland, WA 98033 1_800_945_8408 Kirkland • Seattle WWw.poceengrs.com FAX: (425) 827-5043 I I ,y ./ ....... ·111·· ... ' -.-_. -,'---,- ----l-'--" -.------I· h ..... , ,eX O· RAV[l M , ! ··1········-_.' .... . .••.•.............. -_ .. ----.~-_.----._-' ----- -'-'·--.t--: . __ .. -_ ..... _--,----.. " .. _---. _. ____________ J •• _~ ___ . ___ .. __ • ''I : ' .. C.,,/ . . . . : :~ t..., 1-· ") I'~ r-: "~ '0 ") II I! ~(lj n: tJJ 8 ?~ VI -- Il! " '" ., , , , 8Fm:l(, ']Li!G i! lO~\/!()! f ,!,~ rl (JO,-?,o'.Y.l.l:i /-10 H,'~~;f: .W-N r .................... J I ___ -III ,. i .-, . ! ":::::::=:::""-1 DATE JUNE, 2004 FRIEDMAN ()EVELOPMENT P.o. BOX 1018 k=-..1±~~~--I SCALE 1"=20'-0" MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 , _I i . ... I " in I I I //1' I "~,.~, / ~"-.. ./ 1\",i'H!\LT -- / CJ C. I;) ('I tr; ,j) ") ".~ II I! .; ~,:, ,,: :~p "'T c· i' . : -';-. :,) II) ".., 'I< J~~ ',---! ('.,' ~: !" -._-(:. ( OJ co , ..... _. '.' ~ .. , 0' '0 t-· ~) I'J ,", II II I: ;~ ~(:~: C) u rn :;;:: 7. '.1 (:; C) ,.) U . ~ ru '" GRAPHIC 20 0 10 20 40 ~~~ ... :=1~ ',", ·.~--::--.:·0:mo .C ........ _=.~_-=. ~'. -_. -0--{oj" ~- "~.-. '_~OO;-c-~=--.~: :'i:~~:~~~· ,..-,:~=.; c:~.-. ". ~ \'iC):):J'flSi~ If 11~', \ I" k.:-----r :.<;::-: ~f::~ r iH r I r]{)I~ '-,\IJY! 3.., il.-:"--"::"'- , ~~'I . .' -""' .' -""'-""' - Call before you O,g. 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SER~CE -- PERMIT DRAWINGS JOB NUMBER MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE 04441.00 WA TER & SANITARY SEWER PLAN SHEET C4.0 OF D " ~ ~ ~ , ~-, !' ~ ~ ~ , 'i: D ~ "' ~ , " , D ''6 .2 v, , c " , l3 " DESIGNED JMB DRAIIN FPH CHECKED JMB 1--------23 3/4" ----------1 I 2 1/2" NOTES: -11--5/8" 1. USE WIlH FRAME DRILLED AND TAPPED FOR LOCKING BOLTS. 2. USE WI"IH TWO LOCKING BOLTS 5/8"-11 NC STAINLESS STEEL TYPE 304 STEEL SOCKET HEAD (ALLEN HEAD) BOLTS, 2" LONG. 3. COVER MATERIAL IS CAST IRON PER ASTM A48 CLASS 30. 4. SHALL GONFROM TO SEC. 7.05 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 5. COVER SHALL HAVE THE WORD "DRAIN" IN 2-INCH RAISED LETTERS. M , , . ' ~' . , -, . . " ";'; ,; -.1 • CATCH BASIN fRAME AND VANEO GRATE -OR MANHOLE RING AND COVER I""---.....·~ HANOHOLD ~ 11~·----;. i==~/' PECrAAGULAA ADJUSTMENT SEr:T10N ;, ~~ :': :.' "" """""'A""''''''' "'''0' < = STEPSOR-r LAnOER '= '-' ... ! ! .. :,,= ! ~i~ ! ii, ,-. ~. = l---"i~'7"c:i ...... -•. ~ .. ~ ... • < '-'.' ,'MiN ==17 ORTAA: '" # 51 25' ",/IX I ~ / REINfORCINO STEEl FILLET "y~' ~ !:1~ .. I::i' ~ _.-~ 1 T "'""" ~ '. ":1 ~ '. . .... , . ,'>~ .' . ' .. " " ==re" CAST IN PLACE PREC"ST WITH RISER. SEPARATE BASE I INTEGRAL BASE -"0. RIHG GRAVEL BACKFllLFOR -I ~:.:. 1:!" PIPE ZONE BEODING ~ :~7:·;-:-:7 . .-. -I ',' .• T.. ,_ foL"~~,-"""" .. ,~ .J' SEP"RATE BASE PRECAST . 2" 2 3/8" -=--2 3/8" CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN DIAMeTER ,,- ". ,. n-.,. __ 5/8" 1 1/4" I 17 3/4" 1/4" -If-1/8" ~4 3/4" SURFACE WATER UTILITY SOLID LOCKING COVER e ADOPTED em' f1I'_ owe. NAME: BR-02 NOTES 1. No steps am required wheii Ileigh! Is 4' or less. 2. The bottom of the prtl~sl t<l.lch ba~in may be sloped to fadUlale daaning. 3. Frome and grate may be jn~talled with HangEl down or cast into Eldjoslment sectl{]n. 4. Knockouts shall have a wulllhickness of 2' minimum to 2.5M maximum. Provide a 1.5" minimum gap between the knocl<ollt wal! and lt1e outside olll1e piPE!. Alter the pipe is installed, lilt Iha gap with joint mortar In accordance with Std. Spec. 9-04.3 . CATCH BASIN DIMENSIONS BASE THICKNESS MIIXlMUM KNOCKOUT SIZl:: PIPE ALLOWANCES BIlSE REINFORCING STEEL m'ltt IN EACH DIRI::CT1DN PIPE MATERIAL 'MTl-l MAXIMUM INSIDE DIAMETER Ale SOliD PROFILE: CONCFlETE METAL CPSSP CD ~e~L@ ~~~L@ 24-00-" ". '" ,. ". W' ,,-w-. . ,.. ". ;e-"'. ". '" ". .,. ,,-'" ,. n' ",' ,. '" SP PAGE: 8020 (!) CORRUGATEO POLYETHVlENE STORM SEWER PIPE (Sid. Spec. 9.05.20) ® (Std. Spill:. G-05.12(1)) CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STANDARD PLAN B·1e @fStd,Spec.9-05_12(21) SHeET 1 OF 1 SHEET '-1 I ;;~ROIfi~ BLiCATION L... ,AI " Yn"" I'UI~ • '.'U£5I<lHt' .... ""to ~_ '-l)O(Q ""( ... , .... ," Hill! I· .. = W""'I"IIIon SI<d. Pe~ ..... 'off"' ....... """ ... 0'" ""10''''' .. Engineering • ro ~ ..., "-~~ ..., 11" 1 1/4" FOUNDARY NAME 1/2" LETTERS RECESSED Til BE FLUSH TOP VIEW R~7 1/4" I 7/8"-I- 23 1/2" 1 3/4,,-J 3/4"- T BOTTOM VIEW LEVELING PADS 8 -3/4"X 1 3/4"X 1/8" 1/4" -,f'l-- BARS 1 ,3/8" THICK THIS AREA 3/4" 1 1/4" 1 V4" 2 1/2" 2" END VIEW / /'~")< ROUND ELLIPTICAL TANGENT BETWEEN . TWO RADII OPTIONAL DESIGN FOR GRATE OPENING ENDS 1/2" SIDE VIEW NOTES: 1. SLOT FORMED AND RECESSED FOR 5/8"-11 NC X 2" SOCKET HEAD -l 5/8" SLOT DETAIL SURFACE WATER UTILITY CATCH BASIN FRAUE I( GRATE DETAILS (SHEET 1 OF 2) (ALLEN HEAD) BOLT. 2. GRATE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON. 3. SHALL CONFORM TO SEC. 9-05.15 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 4. USE VANED GRATE IN CURB LINE. 5. USE FRAME SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAIL D-7. 6. GRATE IS OLYMPIC FOUNDRY #SM50G OR EQUAL. FRAME AND VANED GRAfE RECTANGULAR ADJUSTMENT SECTION ~3 BAR EACH CORNER - 11.1 BAR EACH SIDE - I/JBAREACHWIIY -"-~ PRECAST BA.SE SECTION Planning Surveying NOTES ADOPTED em'1D'_ __ un _12/88 OWG. NAME: BR-l B 1. As an acceptable. alternate. to Tellar, wiro mesh having a minimum area Qr 0,12 square inches per fool may be used. Wire mash shall not be placed in knockouts. 2. The knockout dIameter sh"U not be greater !han 20", Knockouts shall hav!) a wall thickness 012" minimum to 2.5" maximum. Prollide a 1.5" minimum gap between the kllOckoul wall and the outside of the pipe. Aftar lt1a pipe is installed. lilt the gap withjolnl mortar in accordance with St~. Spec. 9-04.3. 3. The maximum depth from Ihe finished grade to the pipe invet1 shall be 5', 4. Frame and grato may be Installed with flange down or cast into adjustment section. S. The precast base 5ection may have a rounded Hoor and the walls may be slopeO at a rate of 1:24 or steaper 6. Opening shall be measured at the top of Ih,~ precast base section. PIPE AllOWANCeS MAXIMUM PIPE MAlERlAL INSIDE DIAM':~ REINFORCEO OR 12" PlAIN CONCRETE ALL METAL PIPE ". CPSSP * ,,-(SId SfX'{;. 9-05.20) 50LlOWALLPVC ". (Sid. Sp<lc. 9-05. tl(I)) SP PAGE: B020.1 PROFilE WALL PVC ". (Sid SI>'I(:. 9-Q5,'Z{2!) * COHRUGATED POLYEltl'1tENE STORM SEV.'ER PIPE CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 STANDARD PLAN B·1 "01 ',oto ... < ""J.'."~ '''It "'\ .. ="'--1 DATE ---- STORM WATER DRAINAGE NOTES 1. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY OCCURS, A PRE- CONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE HELD WITH THE CITY OF R[NTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DESIGN ENGINEER. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "1988 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION" PREPARED BY W.S.D.O.T., AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION (APWA), AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 3. THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DESIGN ENGINEER OR STORM WATER UTILITY. 4. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 5. DATUM SHALL BE U.S.G.S. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. REFERENCE BENCHMARK AND ELEVATION ARE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 6. ALL SEDIMENTATION/EROSION FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, AND THEY MUST BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON-SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 7. ALL RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITIES MUST BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, STORM WATER UTILITY. 8. GRASS SEED MAY BE APPLIED BY HDYROSEEDING. THE GRASS SEED MIXTURE, OTHER THAN CITY OF RENTON APPROVED STANDARD MIXES, SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, STORM WATER UTILITY. 9. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROfJERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7 -02.3( 1) OF THE CURRENT STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE NECESSARY LEVELING OF THE TRENCH BOTTOM OR THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL AS WELL AS PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BEDDING MATERIAL TO UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PIPE WILL BE SUPPORTED ON A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. ALL PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE APWA CLASS "C", WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PVC PIPE. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 95% FOR PAVEMENT AND STRUCTURAL FILL AND 90% OTHERWISE PER ASTM 0-1557-70. PEA GRAVEL BEDDING SHALL BE 6" OVER AND UNDER P.V.C. PIPE. 10. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE AND ALUMINIZED STEEL PIPE For~ ALL DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHALL HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. 11. STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SPRING LINE OF ANY STORM DRAINAGE PIPE, OR 15 FEET FROM THE TOP OF ANY CHANNEL BANK. 12. ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL BE DEPRESSED 0.1 D FEET BELOW PAVEMENT LEVEL. 13. OPEN CUT ROAD CROSSINGS THROUGH EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL NOT BE ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DESIGN ENGINEER . 14. ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF ROADSIDE DITCHES, WHERE REQUIRED, SHALL BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK PLACED TO A DEPTH OF 1 FOOT AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 4"-8"/40%-70% PASSING; :/'-4" ROCK/30%-40% PASSING; AND -2" ROCK/10%-20% PASSING. 15. ALL BUILDING DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, UNLESS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DESIGN ENGINEER OR STORM WATER UTILITY. AN ACCURATELY DIMENSIONED CERTIFIED ASBUILT DRAWING OF THIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF RENTON UPON COMPLETION . 16. ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT BY THE CITY OF RENTON DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER OF THE CONTINUING LEGAL OBLIGATION AND/OR LIABILITY CONNECTED WITH STORM SURFACE WATER DISPOSITION. FURTHER, THE CITY OF RENTON DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY OBLIGATION FOR THE PROPER FUNCTIONING AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE SAFEGUARD, SAFETY DEVICES, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, FLAGGERS, AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE LIFT, HEALTH, AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC, AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACT. ANY WORK WITHIN THE TRAVELED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT MAY INTERRUPT NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL REQUIRE AN APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS . ALL SECTIONS OF THE W.S.D.O.T. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1-07.23, TRAFFIC CONTROL, SHALL APPLY. 18. SPECIAL DRAINAGE MEASURES WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE PROJECT LOCATION IS WITHIN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA. Call before you O,g. PERMIT DRAWINGS 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) JOB NUMBER Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 1018 JUNE, 2004 MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE STORM DRAINAGE 04441.00 AS NOTED 750 Sixth Street SOLJth Kirkland, WA 98033 www.paceengrs,com PH, (425) 827-2014 1-800-945-8408 FAX, (425) 827-5043 Kirkland • Seattle MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 SHEET C3.1 OF 1-::-:= ______ -1 SCALE NOTES & DETAILS cj ::c~ .C 1:1" .~:> !=.':~ d: 0' I (.:0 'i~ I ~; ~! ~:;;:~ ~~ :J-:~ :::. Q~ "., -Q -1- HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON, NAD 83/91 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. BASED ON HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 205 AND 1887. POiNT 205 BEING A MON IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF BURNETT AVE AND 2ND ST,; POINT 1887 BINING A BRASS PLUG AT THE INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND WELLS AVE. VERTICAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON, NAVD 88 BASED ON CITY VERTICAL CONTROL MARK NUMBER 1939 WITH A PUBLISHED ELEVATION OF 11.383 METERS. 11.383 METERS x 39.37/12=37.345 FEET. I I I ! , i' /,/ :;; ! ~ ! , r I I ! I , i I "j I ._! I /1 • 1-" , : .,. f . , ! I i I·, " ,- " '''''', f GRAPHIC SCALE " 'I' " , Call before you Dig· 1-800-424-5555 G ~ .. UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) .. r-u . '", ~ 2:. • • ~'\\... /4'/ ..,. ''",,('t '~UNAI ~ I J C" : , l<-' .. c=-~1,U--=-:--c:c:============:::r::r::::cr-:~~=--::::---::=----;:=r---=::::::-:::::::-::=::::~I~~~:JiiATE-_I.:::::-P~E::R::M:;I::T~D::R::A;;W~I~N=G~S;;t~JO~N~UMBEtR ~;;';-';;'I ~,L.' Engineering Planning Surveying FRIEDMAN [)EVELOPMENT DATE MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE , II~-~ ~:::ED=~:M:~~ ___ I-I--_ -_ ~_f-I--_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_-_--_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ -_,-_-_ -_ -_ -_-_ -_ -_-_-_t-t--_ -_ -_.t-t--_ -_ --1-t -_ -_ -_ -I-I~ ,,/f: J,". if;;;;!("" ~5:n5~~:II:~'~:O"~sso~~~O~:,sWACo9::'~'ting En:::::~:~rs~~~' P.O, 30X 1018 • ~=..:!!:~~~_---1SCALEJUNE' 2004 04441.00 (~~ PH: (425) 827-2014 1-800-945-8408 FAX: (425) 827-5043 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 r1 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN IJ.t~J~CH:EC~KE:D:J:M=B~:-:-:J'~[i::::::::::::::::~~:::::::::::::::j~!1~:t~[l __ ~ __________ ~ ______________ ~K:~:M:nd~~.~Se:.:w~e ____________ JL __________________ ... ______________________ 1. ______________ L-__ 1~"~2~O~':O~'_' __ .JL. ________ ~~~~~~~~~~.:~~ ______ ----~S~HE:ET~C~3~.0~O~F~~~ 1-1/2" AND 2" WATER SERVICE DETAIL ~I I~ CAUDQN'VALVE BO)( SHOULD NOT REST ON PIPE. LATER COMPACTION IN AREA OF VALVE BOX COULD CAUSE THE BREAKAGE OF THE SERV1CE. MATERIA! liST fOR 2" SfR\olCE' MgIEB I MAIm IN pt.NfDNC SffllP BEJl!!EEH PJRA &S1QfWA' K 3. 2-double disc gilt, ygl". (fill optnlnO for topplnV) with th~$cI end .. aqua ... op..-otlnv nut. lJ'ld valw nut edenalon If requtr.d (dwg: BR46/PQ9' 8090). 4. Two piece coat Iron val~ box. standard a-top IIICtIon with regular boM NCtlon. ',n9th to fit. 'ug:-t)pO cover. 5. 2" bran bulhlnll (M!PT II: FJPT). 2 each 2" bra .. or br«lze nlpp/ .. 6-length. threaded enda. 2 each 2--90' broel or bronlll .bow. (FlPT II: RPl). e. 2" (MIPl) )( comprnslon fltt'"II. Ford eM-Se Of equQl. 7. 2-toft copper tublrlg t)flll ~. I .... gth to til 8. 2-pack-joint 90' ell, for Ford L44-n or equal. O. 2-eu,lom .. U ... with b)'-pa .. Ford \IFH 77-128 II 17-3/18-or ~uol. with flong.d angle wive QIId pocllook wlnil en Inl.t, ond angle check wive outlet, baH valvt 1)11 bwo-with pQdlDCk w~g.. CU.tometter thall ha ... wrtlco1 Inlet ond outlet. 10. Rigid mwl ... ~,..oder to b. lupplled ond In.tCllh.d In meter •• tter by contractar, 11. Woter meter Ihall be .uppl1ed «Id lnetolr.d by CIt, of Renlon upon pO)lTlent of 011 reloled waifi!' meier f .. and eotlsfoctory prenure end purity tnt.. 12. 17"x2S-concrete meter box wltll 3/8-etHl diamond-plate COWl' equal to F~ llte Meter Seal Co. No. 2T. Meier bOle thoU bill double etacked. 13. 2-coupling (comprenton x RPl) "'th 2!' plug (1II1PT). Ford C-I4-66 or equal. The property owner I, ruponalble for ony nec::eseory odoptoUon or extension of ... ~ ~ '" . INSTALL METER BOX AT . '" 1: (IN UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY' 1: o 0 ~ PROPERTY LINE. I ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '\ 'I h : .. ~.':"' ... '.;:.'l· '.;-"'~; .;;~. 1-ill--~O" MIN. I MAX • ~. 3S" MIN . .,,' • 1 <A"" EXPOSED COVER ~ --l ~~~ r BY PASS NOT NEEDED FOR IRRIGA nON METERS ========Ii 7 .. ~ , '-(;RU~iHED ROCK BASE .,.ATEB!M ust EM '_1n-SEB..,cr· NfIER 'ocmp IN PJANDHG ~~p :=;mV:pL:'!'f'WAIK ~ .. 2-lapped lee. ( ): A 2-BRASS NIPPLE (MIPT X MIPT) CAST IRON OR CONCRETE BLOCKS z. 6-tong X r bran nlpp~ with ttIr«Ided end. (MIPT). ~D 3. 2" double drlc gote 'odYIJ (fuU opening for topplnglW'th thrIGdttd ...... quare DUCTILE IRON opwoUng nllt. and vol ... nut ~t'""on If required dwg BR46!PDlitI B09O). WATERMAIN. 4. Two pJeoe call Iron val .... box. Siandort! 8-top leetlon wIth regular bOM .. ction. FOR SERVICE FROM EXISTING IlIIgth to fit, 'ug" IMII COWI'. WATERt.AA1NS INSTALL 2" FORD 5. 2-X 1-1/2-hu broil bu.,ln\J (t,IPT x FlPT), F202 STYLE SADDEL (IPT) .2 lOch 1-1/2: bran or bronze nJpplu 6" lenoth. threaded ends. ALJERNATE CONNECTIQN DETAIL 2 lOch 1-1/2--90' bron or bronze lIbowe (rfPT x FlPT), 6. 1-1/2" (NIPT) x cornpr .... on flH1n~ Ford C84-M or liquor. 7. 1-1/2-10ft copper tubIng t)pl -K • length 10 flt. 8. 1-1/2" pock-Jolnl 90' ell. for FOTd 1.44-77 or equo!. t. 1-1/2" CUllomHtt .. "'It! by-pan Ford VFH 6f1-12S I( 13-3/16" or equal, wIth flanged ontl. valve and podloc:k wlnge on Intet, end angl. cheok vol .... ouUet, botl Wit ... on b)1lo" with plRloc::k wings. eu.tomaetter ,lion ho .... vertIcal Inlet Gnd ouUet. 10. Rigid meter apreader to be aupplled ond In.tolled In met .... U .. by controc::tor. 11. Water meter .tIdl bl auppned ond Inltalled by City of R.,lon upon pO)ment of oil nlotM wet .. meter fee CJI'ld laUlfoctory prellure ond purlly tntll. 12. 1TI!2a-COfICI'IIt. mIter box with 3/t1' eteet dlamond-plote cover ~ual to F~ Tit. Met ... Seal Co. No. 2T. Meter box Iholl "' dCJUble lri:ocked. 13. 1-1/2" coupling ,<;~""'lon x FlPT) with 1-1/2-plug (Mlf'1j. Ford C-14-66 or~. The p y owner II 1'ftPO!l11bl. for any nKeIIGI')I odoplotion or exten,Ion of wetII' encll. FOR EXISTING MAINS 1-1/2" .. 2" YATER SBRYICB DBTAIL LOCATBD IN PLANTJlfG 8TRIP BJi'i'iIB.I5ft CURB .. SIDEWALK woler ehcl. ®= L-__________________________________ --LB~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i§~~ __ ~~~~.~K:~~A~~.~B~R4~~~Nft::~'~::~sp~P~~~.!Bl~07~.~I~ WATER UTILITY GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF RENTON UTILITY DEPARTMENT AND THE LATEST EDITION OF THE WSDOT/APWA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON. A SET OF APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE HOURS OF WORK IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE LIMITED TO 8:30 AM TO 3: 30 PM ON WEEKDAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AT 235-2635. ALL STREET CLOSURES, PARTIAL OR FULL, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND 911 SHALL BE NOTIFIED 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. 3. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TRUE AND CORRECT LOCATION SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. FOR UTILITY LOCATE CALL UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER, 1-800-424-5555. 4. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE TO BE CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON PIPE CONFORMING TO AWWA C110 AND C111 OR LATEST REVISION, THICKNESS CLASS 52 CEMENT MORTAR LINING AND SEAL COATING SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C1D4 OR LATEST REVISION. PIPE JOINTS TO BE PUSH-ON OR MECHANICAL JOINT. BEDDING TO BE CLASS C. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE INSTALLED SOUTH OF SUNSET BLVD. (EMPIRE WAY, SR 900) AND WEST OF SR 167 (EAST VALLEY FREEWAY) OR IN SOILS OF HIGH RESISTIVITY SHALL BE POLYETHYLENE WRAPPED PER ANSI/AWWA C105-77 STANDARDS. 5. CAST IRON AND DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS SHALL BE CEMENT LINED, PRESSURE RATED AS NOTED ON PLANS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSIjAWWA C110/A21.10-82. CEMENT LINING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSIjAWWA C104/A21.4-85. IF FITTINGS ARE 3 INCHES TO 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS, THE FITTINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EITHER ANSIjAWWA C110/A21.10-82 OR ANSI/AWWA C153/A21.53-84. 3-INCH TO 12-INCH DIAMETER FITTINGS WHICH HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS AND/OR FLANGED JOINTS SHALL BE IN ACCO~DANCE WITH ANSIjAWWA C110/A21.10.82 OR A COMBINATION OF ANSI/AWWA C110/A21.10.82 AND ANSI/AWWA C153/A21.53-84 SUCH THAT THE PORTION OF THE FITTING WITH A MECHANICAL JOINT(S), MAY BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/AWWA C153/A21.53-84 AND THAT PORTION OF THE FITTING WITH FLANGED JOINT(S) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANS!/AV:WA C110/A21.10-82. ACCEPTANCE TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 53-5.3 OF ANSIjAWWA C153/A21.53-84 OR WITH SECTION 10-13 OF ANSIjAWWA C110/A21.10-82 SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND TRANSMITTED TO THE OWl'lER. 6. GATE VALVES SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C500 AND SHALL BE IRON BODY , BRONZED-MOUNTED, DOUBLE DISC WITH BRONZE WEDGING DEVICE AND O-RING STUFFING BOX. VALVES SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR A MINIMUM WATER OPERATING PRESSURE OF 200 PSI. GATE VALVES SHALL BE CLOW LIST 14, MUELLER COMPANY NO. A2380, OR M&H. ALL VALVES 12" IN DIAMETER AND LARGER, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A VAULT. SEE WATER STANDARD DETAIL FOR 12" GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY VAULT AND 1" BYPASS INSTALLATION. ?7. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE COREY TYPE (OPENING WITH THE PRESSURE) CONFORMING TO AWWA C504-80 WITH A 6 INCH INLET AND A M.V.O. OF 5 INCHES, TWO 2-1/2 INCH HOSE NOZZLES WITH NATIONAL STANDARD 7 INCH, 60 DEGREES V. THREADS, O.D. THREAD 4.875 AND ROOT DIAMETER 4.6263, 1-1/4 INCH PENTAGON OPERATING NUT OPENED BY TURNING COUNTER CLOCKWISE (LEFT). 8. ALL WATER MAIN 10 INCHES AND SMALLER TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM COVER OF 36 INCHES BELOW FINISH GRADE. ALL WATER MAIN 12 INCHES AND LARGER SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 48 INCHES BELOW FINISH GRADE. WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS OCCUR, WA TER MAINS ARE TO BE LOWERED TO CLEAR. 9. ALL WATER MAINS SIX (6) INCHES IN DIAMETER AND LARGER SHALL BE CLEANED WITH PIPE CLEANING "PIGS" PRIOR TO DISINFECTION. THE "POLY PIGS" SHALL BE GIRARD INDUSTRIES AQUA SWAB-AS OR APPROVED EQUAL, 2 LB/CU FT DENSITY FOAM WITH 90A DUROMETER URETHANE RUBBER COATING ON THE REAR OF "PIG" ONLY. "PIGS" SHALL BE CYLINDER SHAPED WITH BULLET NOSE OR SQUARE END. THE CITY WILL ASSIST THE CONTRACTOR WHO WILL PERFORM THE CLEANING OPERATION. 9A. ALL WATER MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO A MINIMUM OF 200 PSI OR 150 PSI OVER OPERATING PRESSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. ALL PRESSURE TESTING SHALL BE DONE IN THE PRESENCE OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF RENTON. ~~-----DATE BY APP'D 9B. ALL WATER MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE DISINFECTED BY THE INJECTION OF A 50 PPM (MINIMUM CONCENTRATION) CHLORINE/WATER SOLUTION. DRY CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN THE PIPE AS LAID. CHLORINE SHALL BE METERED/INJECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7-11.3(12)E OR 7-11.3(12)F OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCED IN 1 ABOVE. 10. A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) WORKING DAYS NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR SCHEDULING. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PRECON A PERMIT INFORMATION SHEET MUST BE SUPPLIED TO THE UTILITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. TWENTY-FOUR HOUR NOTICE WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO STARTING NEW CONSTRUCTION. 11. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 12. INSTALLATION OF CORPORATE STOPS, WATER SERVICES, LINES AND METERS SHALL NOT BE DONE UNTIL ALL SERVICE AGREEMENTS, METER APPLICATIONS, CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, AND PAYMENT OF FEES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE CITY OF RENTON. 13. ALL CONNECTION TO EXISTING MAINS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY OF RENTON, EXCEPT WET TAPS WHICH MAY BE MADE BY APPROVED WET TAP CONTRACTORS WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. ALL NECESSARY EXCAVATION AND MATERIALS TO BE SUPPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND BE ON-SITE PRIOR TO CITY NOTIFICATIONS. 14. INSPECTION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF RENTON. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BACKFILLING ALL CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR, AS WELL AS THE ENGINEERS, SHALL KEEP AS-BUILT DRAWINGS. 15. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PLUGS AND TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLIES FOR TESTING AND PURITY ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO FINAL TIE-IN. 16. ALL JOINT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS (SHACKLE RODS, NUTS, BOLTS, ETC.) SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED BY THE STAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO OR EQUAL APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 17. ASPHALT AND CONCRETE STREET PAVING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO INCHES. OIL MAT STREETS MAY BE SPADE CUT. ALL SURFACE CONCRETE, PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS, CURB, GUTTERS, AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES SHALL BE SAWCUT TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO INCHES OR REMOVED TO AN EXISTING EXPANSION POINT. 18. A TEMPORARY COLD MIX ASPHALT PATCH SHALL BE PLACED ON THE DAY OF INITIAL EXCAVATION WITH A PERMANENT, SEALED PATCH TO BE PLACED, TO CITY OF RENTON POLICY, WITHIN TEN DAYS. CALL FOR SUBGRADE INSPECTION PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FINAL PATCH. TRENCHES WILL NOT BE LEFT OPEN OVER NIGHT WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE INSPECTOR. 19. FOR CITY PROJECTS SUCH AS TELEMETRY CONDUIT, THE PVC PIPE USED SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 IN UNIMPROVED AREAS AND SCHEDULE 80 UNDER IMPROVED AREAS. ALL CHEMICAL PROCESS LINES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC PIPE. Surveying Engineers, Inc. www.paceengrs.com FAX, (425) 827-5043 FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.o. BOX 1018 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 DATE SURV. CPU FILE: toAW:-------1 SCALE -----' JUNE, 2004 AS NOTED MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE WATER NOTES & DETAILS I 1 • If>V • ~ION'I. I I JOB NUMBER 04441.00 ~NO. l1.dwa SHEET C4.2 OF s; 0-". q » I\) • Go) ::D 8 -~ I IC=cc=-::::c'"~,,,·- I I . I ,cci=-:~cil Ii III II ,I., .. -.=o;'c-=.~--c,~:::-c I II I II iii, I 'I, -II ill II 1 1 '1: i iii ! I~ 1=::::-i=I~=II'''~'c;=~~C'! i III II! II ~ih Illmll!! 4-11:1 I,i iii!! illl'I;' :l,1 "1,1 III i lill 'il'II'!1 11'~llli II11I ,Iiil! !II I 'j Iii 'i 11111111=1 =='1 ~"':: ~. =I~I j I ,.-' II " .. , ' ,_'C " 11'1 II I , I,i II i I' I I i· .j I II ,'I -:J , I,! I II,'~' , Iii I, I I' L-. TI ., !I I i ! ! 1 " I ,! II I [II III I ' 111 I I, I III " III II , tl'l ~ "Iii i' I Ii I ~ ~ L.-~ " I , Ii I I' 'I I I I ' I ii I' I I i , ~ r-- ~ ~ ~ I' , . ___ ~----4> ~ I I II ,---. '¥I . ___ .... __ I r I' ___ _ I , [k'. '/ ~ ~ ~ ,--r-- c-- l...!..Ll ~ ~ ! ,---r-- 1111!1;~~~_~:c~~i~~~2~~2~~~=~=~~~~~~-/lil !i 'II 1[1 'I I : !II I' , II i I II 1111 il !1 i ;11 Ii ! 1III I 'II' II 1'111 II II II11 ! II I II il III iii I' II! iii I I'i' II III I ' I I' Ii! iili-+.!.'..:I!I-' --I-I---.il !I I i II Ii i i if 1"1 111 I III I II i !i I il Iii Ii I ~, Iii Il'i i II i, ill I I , iii ii" 1II'i III I 'I! !IIIIII'IIII!j i'lllllllllllll ,Ii ~Ii II t I i II II il ! I i I il: I Ii' WllL, iii ii III II!' ! 111 1, II II iii I jllJ "I 'I I' .II I I' I III I '1 1 1' 'I I ,il I "I' 'I i' I ii', "1111 II II I II ' " , I ' 'II -I II· I I I I I' " I i I, 'I! Ii II Ii' Ii I I i 1:11 !i I i il I: I III I i ill Iii iii! 11'1 'I I! I., 'I d II. I '. ill! I I III 1,[ r i I ! Ii !i! I i I! iii 'I i Ii! i I I I I I!: i 'III II i ' III II i L..- IIIi II: II I,ll'! II i III I I I: i I III iii I, 'II' i ! II I I I I" I I II i'l I Ii, ' d I'i ! ,I i ,I Ii: I I i, II I i I II i ,i Ii' I III ! II Ii i II I II 11II iii 'rid II '!I' II I I I ' III 'I' "I 'i, 1[';111 'I' illl!!lil!]!!'III!I'II, .lli.'1111 1I1I 11:111'1111 ·1 'II II Iii I I I ' II I ' I I,. 11 I I, II 1:411 Ii iilllll!ll,i [IIIIIIIIIIIII!III[!"III:II I I Iii I" I' I 'I I ,I "II "Ii 1'1 illl!HIIIIIII '1!!:lli!:1 Ililll!I" 'III! III I111 I.' I, 'I I ,,' , I II I' , i I 'I 'I III I' I" "I' I . 'I I L I 'I " 'I 'I "1' I I I I I I ,I I ' Ii I I, 1·1 i III, t Ii ii' :11 ,I ill i Iii 1'1' I' I!I ilill Ii I ill I Iii I!I II I Ij IIL _____ .j II!II, II i iii III! I, II III I, II" .------.--.---. "'I 1'1 II" II' , I, Ii III i I . -0______ . ., II II I'll 111'1 I 1'1 11,1 , I "-:~-"-: -". '-:i: II 1:1 I II II II! I·' '_-, __ c 'C.'C' __ -ccC.' --. --. I, II I ,1 111 'II II! -.--~.::~.~~~ -----.. ----., 'ill ~l' 1.11r.1 __ ~:-~=::~=/. -== ~~;~-.Cc C :=-)_~~:.~.: __ I' ___ I II ~ II ~ ~ 1· 'lUll 1"'1' I I', ·':".C.=,=:o,::,:=c:~~~=_CCc.=="=·= II, II I'IIIW-I r I III ---.-._-----~--~.-, , .. ------------------,,---'I I I . ,'I ,,' , I ,......_ ...... I II" III II I :' I : ----------,-----'" ----------.-, J i I ILlllli!l! 1111'1, ill~li~i~·~~~~··~~~I'I'·IIIII:1111 !:I i i'I'I' ii i~; i 1m:, Ii ,i!.l.i ii, !.Idl!,,[!i'il liillll'l ii, 'Ii Iii I i III' Ii ii'li Iii I'II!I iii I III II I I' I I: i 'I' 'I ,I I Ii' II' I I I ii' I I Ii! I !, II 1'1'.' 'I" I II II I " . II I II I II II ! i 'III I II II I III I I . I ' I II : [, I : II I Ii' I 'I II, I I! III I ill, ; iii' i ii' II i i II,11 II 'II I, III I I i ill II "iW 'I I' I III iii " III III rr I ii' II i ii Ii 1111 11111I I Iii' 1I1I 1111 1111, Iii I1111I Iii Til [ i Ilil i ill II II i I, I I i I! I[ , II I ,I 'Iii ,Ii I i I II lillllil!I,IIII! III ll,IIIIIIIIII! .. ~ijl I: il !IIIII ,I'I i 1111' Iii 1:11111 I II ' , ' , I , I I' 1,1 I I 'I II ," I, I '1111111111,I:1111111!11 I ,II Iii ill I I 1 H II ' I ! I' I, I , II' " I'" ' I I !, I I ,II I I , I" : I ii' II II ! I :' I Ii i:I!1 Iii! ill I! I1III11 i 11I11 1:11 II1I1 'i I I ililli Iii I II! Iii il i ,I, Ill: I III 1111 1I11 I11I1 III1 iii ,111 1 I ' III -I II ! i i : III I III,! " ., II I I'" -, I I ' III' I ' , Iii II I I q 'II ii' I 'I' , I ,II I, I I '1' I' '" 'I' " T" il'!III!' I III Iii' ,I:ii ,il II ii'~ Ii IIIII:I! 1:1 11'111 1IIIIIIIIIIi ! III' 111111 'I Ii Ii I I I, I I ,I II !:, I il I,I I I, 'I ! II ,I I' iii I I I '1'1 ill II' I III ' I I ' I I I III I 111 '1111 i'il 111I1I1 !H-ill++:II+-+-t+-""I ~ I1111 ill II I i I1II II Iii I1I1 .",.-;,,-! 111!i 'il II I iii 1II1 'ill il I'll 'II' I 1'1 ,p 'Ii'i I II lilli' lUI ' i'l 1'1 I I II Iii :1 I I I I I II rl I'll i,' I, d i I, !1I I I I. 111 11' I 'I' Iii ' III "III ii' Ii 'II I ' '1 . I I .' ! ' 1'11'1, Iii lili III' I I II, II IH i I 11I1 I 1111 Iii III il I1II I ,III I11I11111I1 i l ! ,i : I' 11'1 ' I' I, , ,Ii II I ' i'l I I I I . II I III I I' III! I I. I111 III: I II I, 1111I Ii 1I1I IIII IIIi ,: I 1'111 I" I I I II1I ' . II '111 1 ,'\ i :1:Ii 1I1I1I1 IIIII!IIII! "II ill I: , II I[!! ! II ! i II i 1 Ii! I i I II, I Iii I II '1 Lil,IIII I'lil Iii "I' Iii III I I 1'1 I I1I1 Iii I! I, -'11 'I ' I'" I ' '1 ,,, 'I ii II I '" II ,I' "i I I I ! I1I'1 !Ii iii i II i!i IIII II' i 111 1, ! I Iii I I 1 i 'i 'i, Iii ! II! ii ! I111II1 i 111111:111111 : II Ii lJ:'11 iii"I,iiii!i' III Iii" :111 !iililli' i i II i ! i i! : I 'Ii i Ii, I j I !il; iii: 'I' Ii I II' II I I I I' III Ii : i " ,'II !i III' '11 liil 'I 1I11 III 11'11 iirP-T I :" 'i I Ii I , 11'1 ii' II, , ',I II, 1"1 I i II Iii ::, Ii I!' I I: I Iii Iii i r I II I 1 1 ,11 1 111'i! ITi I1II III1 i i ILII iil'l ii' ill!III'! II i'll I", I ' '1'1 'I I I' Ii 'I i' . I! I 111I11 III! 11;11 III 'I ! III!I III 1IIII'Iili ~II I . . r I1I1 , ' II ' I ,." ,]I' '1' I I !I'~ lili II II III ii , 111'11 ii i I tiLli , 'i' ,I I1I11 II .:::.:' ____ . II I iii!' II I1III1 I!! II, I 111-·--------,II II ! I II I IL!I'i~ 'Iii III !:.~~~" -~ .. -'I III I' Iii Ir' IW II!I Ii I -0 __ · ==·.·.·c~~·~· ,I" II I 11'1 !I I =...==_==. _OC__" ..7.--_ II ! I II ,1-·--·-II·' I I-_:_~~:~~=~~-= ... :~:~ __ ;;=c.~ II ----~---.-. --"-----"------.-------" MERRILL GARDENS @ Renton Centre 104 BumettAvenue s. Rcntoo, Washington DATE , 0604.04 SCAlE , 1116"=1'-0< DRAWN BY , 91h JOB NO" 2004.05 DATE PLOTTID ,06.11.04 DWG NM.£ ,MGR--A202 NO. ~ " q ::!I = ::::r -n -o o .... -a 5'" ~ Pennlt 5ubm~tal IlEVISIONS .--- ,---,-- I I [fm?e = r !"II» I r l-»o Ii \Jli rL L, -- l II " Ilb1\ v ~ CII 11~'k1 a'k ~ I~ I~ r;=!1 IIJIB!l'";i I Q b!. F"----i ~Io....,,;;:i ~ I ~I rrF vM ~ ~ II ~ '-JII tJlL ~ v FFkr DATE NO, ~ I I r-r- M !fi;===:db;, F?====I;==dI I~ [Li ~ ~cl II 4> ~ ~====j;==dl ~ '---'~ 1)1 II "I r= Ill) ~ ...... ll_ lrd IlEVISIONS DATE r "'" a- n= q ." o c: .... .... ::::T i ~ --~-------.--~--=-~ -~ ~----::C.:. _____ _ ... :::--~-~~:::''':~=''''''''--==-==,-,--==-:-",,"'::"-'--=:-=-''=~------ ~'O-;.'-:':-',;-io~,'O£c::.=,,_,,=·_-_ :'c" -':::::=:=--=-:"'--=-~-=:Oo_o,,_-,-_· " - -""-=,,-----'---:;.;:-. :===-~-"--~-:-:.::. -----;=.-.:-=:::.:-:==-=---_._---,._----- -----.,~,_-; -.~', --,,----''--''::C-.-__ , ,=_.,~=_"::O'~,--","-~-----c-=-:':'O".c:::,_:::-:cc,:::-,,:;:-,-- ",,--_-----",'c"-,"" _ _ _____ "'~,,'= .. , ------------- I!. II il0lhC JI ~ ¥IF ~ I~ MERRILL GARDENS @RentonCentre DATE, 061J41J4 SCAlE I 1116"=1'-0" DRAWN BY , 9'n JOB NO., 2004.05 I04BumcttA~"'S, I I DATE PlOTTED, 06,11.0' Rentoo. Washington DWG NM£ ,MGR-A202 • ~ " q ...... =-a. ." -o ~ -a -!: Permit Subm~tal NO, I IlEVISIONS / -------------------:/" ---,: I " '7 ",~ '"' c __ :~:·:~~~'=--'=---=-----=:.c:=:~'--=:_c_:::.-_::-:::::'-=:::·:O.~_==::_:_:_--=~.::~. :-.;..-=_",' c' ---~--------_. ._.-,::;-=-==---- 11fl'-,:-C::---,I, -----.- _ -dI __ ._ ~ ':'"00_; .'~,,-----=~_"o-_"'=-:O=-',,,=-=---;:2'-,,:~,'" ------------_ .. ,_. ,---------....... ,.,"' '" .. _. i I-~------o=-'---_-'===-"_='-".'---'=~ I "I ~ II, I I' II ~ ill I I,' ~Jiifll Irnl~1 I~ r,=!!'======9fj! ~6lfIT'J 'Q '-'- ~ i ji- II L I~ 10 ~G\. II ~ DATE ~"=====' ~____ 'II aIL ---JI.!.a--' V IT" 1b;j!===~JtE:r II Me., II I~ F"===...I 1\ ,'."" ~ ~!l....---...J tJ J C1 ~~ \ 1b;;F====j ilao h ~ II _ \:] ~ NO, I~ #r.====9 " .... ~'=9i 'I I Ii ~==jr==dl '====d!9 II~. II II- ~<1L~ IlEVISIONS r---:l 1""'~'9Ti1 I I I - -,-,------------------ I I I ,I' II .1 III I AIlEY D BlJlIIETT AVE S. Beauty Salon = a D lbarv I S!gir: ActiVity Room TERRACE o o 8o!!eQ/ Sprii<lers Kitchen Media D D D D D D D Ymg !M!Jg RQQID. RQQID. D ------=------=,-------,.=------=------ Porte Cochere ~~Fir=st=F=lo=or=p=la=n========~~6~.,I~. I i I 0 I I II I I II i I Ii ~-=se=co=n=d=Flo=o=r=p~=n======~~IA6~.,I~" D mm D 0 0 0 Assisted ~ HB8A~. 0 Private !mng · .... ~ o · ~ · · · · ~ 0 i I ., · · · · ~ · · · · · ~ ~ 5 u 5 -= ~ @) 00 ffi U) c as -Q.. ... d 0 0 -.....:l II.. "C .....:l c ~ 0 () CD C/) ~ ::E A2.1 Renton Centre -----------------------------------------------~-,,------- __________ lil_' __ '---'1<' - - - -_ - -JL _____ 1 __ =_== ----, --8 it ~_~ ___ .n ___ _ - -----------t ---+--r' --------r----.:: '::--_-_-_ ~ W1UJJMS AVE. S. ''l------rl/ I~-----~--' ~5TIII3 ~j)( •. TO REMAIN I 1 I I 411'-3114' I I I I I I I I I I I I AIJ.EY :~''','. , "''7'~''7i..'71-/ / / / / / / /. ://V / / / / / / 1 ,-tfif!1~'1II~w~~~1~5c::~~:::l~~::~:::::::::f~::::~~:I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~'~~·'~~;:~~.;~.~~~.l~O~~III3~~~~5~11m m'e ' c; ,'/.'/ '///,,/(,//,~ '/(///'/////'>':-': ///'//;';'//((,'/,',' ,,' ',','//0/ 1ERR.'CE • 5EGOtiJ FLOOR I Q\' .' .. ~-L .. I I 'S' .-~ ..~. ._.cJ~ /.S '.. . ')1> 'L . I' . . ~.'.' K~I -. .. ... .. ... 1 .'. ' .. '. . l .. . .' . \:...~.:....-~-.:....--,;;,....:....--~-..::......::....----~~;.-.----:.--+::~<t· --~::::::='1f-c---rtit---I-~ PillY VIo(;ATION 'r--'--'---I,;....,,;..;..;.,-~--+---( I ~55TOR'ItlJILDIII3 ~~:~,: AllDR81XATION I:'. ~ ~55TOR'IIlIILDIti; 1 r Z I~ . . I , I 1 I;==='ll J!H1 :--I\--r·-=-"-.-·-,·"--r-I+I ''-R;m W;:"=I'[ IY .•... L,- . I' ' I I L ... ~, I ~ u u "f , = " / '\.1 __ -_ c~ 1 ----- -~~~-~--------------l!r---- -'----=-=-~=----- --- C:lProjlMerrilf Gardens· Renton 2004.05110IMGR-Slte.dwg. 06-17-200414:42:59. HP1055.pc3 ---liN)' ,-- Il'CI I02'.()' .J2& 1»:'1 ~~Si=te=p=la=n== __ ==========~,,,o~~co. -----~, ~INo. '7_ .. LA.'UO. 155 RMden!ial. Units L84 acres PIt:poSfd Height Padring~ PaOOng l'roposf:d; Open Spam Reqlired 50SFx 155 lillie 5" Roor'Thna<r plHoorTenaOl pi Hoor Adility Room 1" Floor Gameroom Lilrarv. MfdiaRoom -. TOTAL Ov.'tEe: A,cltire:t: Civil Engifl*:C PR(J,!ECl' Dnu:CTORY M",illG.rn.m RsolIDnJ\'P, LLC e/o'friedtr.mD~cpm~ P.O.BDxWlS M""", iol.",! WA 98040 T.t. No. (21:6) 232-8330 FA_v, (206) 232-837- Curl~ B .. ttie & A""" .... Arehit"" .. , LIIl., p.s. 313]. Elliot! Ava. # 270 Seat~e, ,,~_~. 98121 Tet. N'o. (2£&) 282·3512 F"~,(: (206) 282-4799 DC1Enginnn 10900 ?IE 4" St ;'11200 Bell"",. WA 98()04 T.t. No. (415) 827-2238 FA" (425)827-8986 "r amumDmgn Grc;rup 2329 E. h,.uiison St. Si!.1t~ 'WA9S112 T.t. No. 01,6) 322-1732 FAJ; (205.322-1799 PACE 750 S ixthtlt.f S Kind.,.! "A 98033 T:1.No. (415) 327-1014 F_'lJ'; (·,25: 1127-5l)!3 GEO (h.'ClJ~ Norr..hwat. ~. 1324tNE2t?H .• Sre.12 Bill"",. WA 98005 Tal. No. (425) 649-8757 FAX (425) 649-8758 UJilll1r1 t r-ll~-I-II' r ! CO~RCIAL I I L_.LL _ I I I' coJRd,T--J 1 :-L_LL'L ____ ....J L ~~vi=cin=it~Y=M~ap==========~~N~ STATISTICS 104J3umettAvellOO, S 0007200156 0007200154 0007200104 ro,025SF 84.4 lIIliiS per a.<re 95 Fee! 6OFee! o 92 7,750 SF 2,715 SF 5,560 SF 1,200 SF 3.236 SF 12,711 SF 7231502030 7231502120 Proposed Building Construction 1~pe: Heiglt: OCCllJl'l%lcies: Floor _;\reas.UnitCcwt Floor Unit Basement 1" 10 2!t1d 37 3:d 38 41~ 38 5" 32 TOnI. 155 4 floors I floor 60' T:;pe VA"" ... T}peL,\ R-2 mdli-filllilyresidem:i1i A-2 "ong,eg;te dinir1g and common area S-2Parking glll'age 11,67781' 32,906 SF 32,376 SF 32,876 SF 29_174 SF \39,509 SF CommQl'l Padcing Total 16,284 SF 16,284 SF 20,02481' 16,284 SF 47,985 SF 1,858 SF 34,764 SF 32,876 SF 32,876 SF 22.174 SF 21,882 SF 3'.568 SF 193,959 SF . . ~ 1111111 I11111 11111111 "" ~ , I 11111 ( (/) Co) .--(/) .--«J -CI) "C c:: «J g. ::E ~ .~ I II .-> 11 -c:: «J -• a.. Q) -.-CI) , , . 2 .~-..., AU ,'-- i- I-e> "- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ CAD/CALC> ____ ~XX~X ____ DRAWN BD . . I! I ~_". I I) I VI' /1/ ~ ~ I t/ . m I SSCD RIM~37.37 I IE 8" PIPE S.~34.77 J -' 1= I ", .1 1 STORY . /:~" CONC. BLDG H 101 flNFLODR ~37.49 (NO BASEMENT): 5696000276 m c ::c z m 1823059262 -i -i » < m • (J) • /»} /' I ' r I ~ I ! i ~ .,' 1\ ~l7.: ~ !~ 1m l---4----------------------------------------------------------+-~-----+--~ lti PLAT CHK,_~XX~X_ I--:"..--'f---____________________ f-----l---I--,--I L.Lll~~~ ________ ~-Slli~--------------~ DATE BY ~p~ (J}iii/! .. ) _~_.I I Engineering Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers. Inc. 750 SlKth street South PH: (425) 827-2014 K,,*'1IIId Klf1<Iond. WA 98033 1-800-945-84llB • SN",-• www.paoeengrs.com Fill<: (425) 827-5043 portllllld J" I \ I -u I I <> I jj @ ~~'~----------------------­.. ("1 0007200145 ~NC. / LEGEND IX! WATER VALVE -0-HYDRANT 8l WATER METER rsJ"v IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE ® @ MANHOLES (SS/SD) o C8 -0-POWER/UTILITY POLE E--GUY ANCHOR ~ POWER TRANSFORMER m ill POWER/TELEPHONE VAULT o TELEPHONE/TV RISER m GAS VALVE ~ STREET LIGHT [}@{l LIGHT POLE J:I-SIGN '" MAILBOX • 4" STEEL POST H METAL I BEAM o TEST PIT K CONIFEROUS TREE 6 DECIDUOUS TREE ~ FOUND CASED MONUMENT ------------------====;',==== __ -5D---- ===~G---UGP---- ___ -OHL----____ UGT ___ _ _0_0_0_0_0_0 _ _0_0_0_0 _0 _0 _ CENTER LINES PROPERTY LINES RIGHT-Of-WAY LINES DITCH LINE WATER LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND POWER LINES OVERHEAD LINES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINES CHAIN LINK FENCE WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE / --.-------. -----_.--------------_.------------.. --------- . ~ ~~~~lWl--~~~~~1I RI:NTON CENTER \ '0\ \ DATE SCALE 7231501965 72.31501970 6-9-2004 1" =20' I ;;;;:;( TE;;:::'-AU---'I~lG;./~VMI::::; 8IL~/PG 543 & ELEc. I GRAPHIC SCALE 20 \ 40 80 I I 20 0 I ~2 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 20 feet I#.~ IrItl N~: ~~ ~" ~ EXPIRES: 10/25/2005 OF: 5El/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 18, T. 23 N" R. 5 E., W.M. PROJECT NO. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 04441.10 FOR MERRIL GARDENS LLC SHEET 2 oF~2",,--_ 5' -0" 2,10" I TER FABRIC MATERIAL 60" WIDE ROLLS. USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE. 2" BY 2" 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC OR EQUIV. ___ -BURY BOTTOM OF FABRIC MATERIAL IN 8" BY 12" TRENCH 2'-6" ~----6' MAX----~ FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 6" 2" BY 2" BY 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC OF EQUIV. 2' 5' 0" PROVIDE 3/4" -1.5" WASHED GRAVEL BACK ...... FI-LL------- IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES """''i+----..L.. OF FILTER FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE. 2" BY 4" WOOD POST AL T: STEEL FENCE POSTS. BRUSH BARRIER NTS R/W ~I ~EXIISTING GROUND MIN. 12 96 REFORMAT TO 11' x17 DATE REVISION NOTES: 1. FOR SHEET RUNOFF OR FOLLOWING DISCHARGE FROM A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. 2. MAXIMUM SLOPE STEEPNESS PERPENDICULAR TO FENCE LINE IS 1: 1. 3. MAXIMUM SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOW PATH LENGTH TO THE FENCE OF 100 FT. 4. IF 50% OR LESS OF THE SOIL, BY WEIGHT, IS FINE PARTICLES SMALLER THAN THE U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NO. 200, THE EOS SHOULD BE EQUAL TO OR SMALLER THAN THE SIEVE SIZE THAT 85% OF THE SOIL CAN PASS THROUGH. 5. THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH 3/4" MINIMUM DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL. 5. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALl. ANY REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIA TEL Y. DC DRT BY PR FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL ADOPTED CITY' 0.. RlRih!NI'l''l'tmflW STANlWm PLAHlI LST DAT.!: 12/98 DWG. NAME: BR21 SP PAGE: B066 EXISTING GROUND 1. Use 4" to 8" quarry spalls or crushed rock for surfacing as shown. Material with 'fines' is not acceptable. 15' /------100' MIN. ------I (MAY BE REDUCED TO 50' MIN FOR SITES WITH LESS THAN 1 ACRE OF EXPOSED SOIL.) 2. The 100' minimum length shall be lengthened as necessary to insure material is not tracked into the public right-of-way. R=25'MIN EXISTING DRIVEWAY RAMP OR SITE ACCESS ROAD PLAN NTS >-« ~ o « o n::: 12 96 REFORMAT TO 11"x17" DATE REVISION TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DCV DRT BY PR ADOPTED CITY' 0.. RBN'l'OH STANlWm PLAHlI LST DAT.!: 12/98 DWG. NAME: BR23 SP PAGE:B068 Engineering Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland. WA 98033 PH, (425) 827-2014 1-800-945-8408 Klrkl.nd • Beatlle www.paceengrs.com FAX, (425) 827-5043 SOUD ---~Jl.!Jf WALLS CATCH BASIN OVERFLOW POROUS BOTTOM FILTER MEDIA FOR DEWATERING NOTE: THIS DETAIL IS ONLY SCHEMATIC. ANY INSERT IS ALLOWED THAT HAS A MIN. 0.5 C.F. OF STORAGE. THE MEANS TO DEWATER THE STORED SEDIMENT, AN OVERFLOW, AND CAN BE EASILY MAINTAINED. CATCH BASIN INSERT GENERAL NOTES: 1. ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT ON OR AROUND THE FILTER FABRIC PROTECTION SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. SEDIMENT SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITH WATER, AND ALL SEDIMENT MUST BE DISPOSED OF AS FILL ON-SITE OR HAULED OFF-SITE. 2. ANY SEDIMENT IN THE CATCH ilASlN INSERT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS FILLED ONE'7THIRD OF THE AVAILABLE STORAGE. THE FILTER MEDIA FOR THE INSERT SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED AT LEAST MONTHLY. . . . FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 1018 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 ==----1 DATE JUNE, 2004 """'~,...... _____ ----I SCALE EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUC110N OR DEVELOPMENT ACllVITY OCCURS, A PRECONSTRUCTION MEE11NG MUST BE HELD WITH THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DESIGN ENGINEER. 2. ALL LIMITS OF CLEARING AND AREAS OF VEGETA 11 ON PRESERVATION AS PRESCRIBED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD AND OBSERVED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL REQUIRED SEDIMENTATION/EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND CLEARING AND/OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNllL SUCH TIME THAT CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND POTENTIAL FOR ON-SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. THE IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT AND ADDITIONS TO EROSION/SEDIMENTA110N CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE. 4. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTA llON CONTROL SYSTEMS DEPICTED ON THIS DRAWING ARE INTENDED TO BE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO MEET ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT MORE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL F ACILl11ES WILL BE NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SILTA110N CONTROL ON THE PROPOSED SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES, OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER QUALITY OF THE RECEIVING DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 5. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSION/SEDIMENTAllON CONTROL ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN. SIZE NOR LOCA llON OF PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, OR RETENTION FACILITIES. 6. DURING THE llME PERIOD OF NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH MARCH 31, ALL PROJECT DISTURBED SOIL AREAS GREATER THAN 5,000 SQUARE FEET. THAT ARE TO BE LEFT UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN TWIELVE (12) HOURS, SHALL BE COVERED BY MULCH, SODDING, OR PLASTIC COVERING. 7. IN ANY AREA WHICH HAS BEEN STRIPPED OF VEGETATION AND WHERE NO FURTHER WORK IS AN11CIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS OR MORE, ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH MULCHING, GRASS PLANTING OR OTHER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL TREATMENT APPLICABLE TO THE 11ME OF YEAR IN QUES110N. GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY DURING THE MONTHS OF APRIL THROUGH SEPTEMBER INCLUSIVE. SEEDING MAY PROCEED, HOWEVER, WHENEVER IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PERMITTEE, BUT MUST BE AUGMENTED WITH MULCHING, NETTING, OR OTHER TREATMENT APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON, OUTSIDE THE SPECIFIED TIME PERIOD. S. FOR ALL EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PONDS WHERE THE DEAD STORAGE DEPTH EXCEEDS 6 INCHES, A FENCE, A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET HIGH IS REQUIRED, WITH 3: 1 SIDE SLOPES. 9. A TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUC110N ENTRANCE, 24' X 50' X s" OF 4-TO 6-INCH QUARRY SPALLS SHALL BE LOCATED AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. PERMIT DRAWINGS MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE TESC NOTES & DETAILS Call before you DIg· 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) I EXPIRES 05/'6/06 JOB NUMBER 04441.00 1/2"X4" EXPANSION MATERIAL 1 / 4"R AT JOINTS SCORE LINES TO BE RADIAL TO CURB AND GUTTER + 1/2"X4" EXPANSION MATERIAL 1 / 4"R AT JOINTS W 1 /2"X4" EXPANSION MATERIAL 1 / 4"R AT JOINTS '" ....-'_ ... W SCORE LINES B ''W''-WIDTH OF SIDEWALK 1 / 4"/FT. SLOPE 1/2"R 1 /2"X5" EXPANSION MATERIAL CURB RETURN ONLY 1/2"R CEM. CONC. CURB AND GUTTER B GENERAL NOTES: JOINTS: DUMMY JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED NOT TO EXCEED IS' C/C NOR LESS THAN 10' C/C. THEY SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3/16" IN THICKNESS AND SHALL BE EXTENDED 2" BELOW THE GUTIER LINE. 1/2" THRU JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL COLD JOINTS AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER AND SHALL EXTEND I" BELOW CONCRETE. WHERE THE SIDEWALK IS TO BE PLACED AGAINST THE CURB AND GUTIER, THE JOINT SHALL BE A COLD JOINT. 1/2"X 5" EXPANSION MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED FROM P.C:S TO P.T:S AT ALL CURB RETURNS. 1/2"X4" EXPANSION MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED AT EVERY FOURTH SIDEWALK PANEL. THE CONCRETE MIX FOR SIDEWALKS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS B (3/4") WITH AIR ENTRAINMENT. THE CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A BROOM FINISH WITH ALL EDGES HAVING A 2Y:z" TOOLED FINISH. SUBGRADE COMPACTION SHALL BE 90~ (MODIFIED PROCTOR). 1 / 4"/FT. SLOPE 1/2"R ~ PAVEMENT AS PER PLANS PAVEMENT AS PER STANDARD CEM. CONC. PLANS J PARKWAY STANDARD CEM. CONC. CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER SECTION A-A SECTION 8-8 SEE SHEET 2.5.1 FOR ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TYPICAL SIDEWALK ADOPTED Cl'I'Y OF RZII ..... IT .. 'Oft1N STAMWID PIAIIS IBl' DAD: 12/98 OWG. NAME: FR-02 SP PAGE: F007 STANDARD APPROACH OPTIONAL APPROACH 12 1 7' L I 6' MIN A~ r--B'MIN-! ~~I~ I I 3' MI N I f-3/B" EX PANSION JOINT I 6' MIN 1--5' --I---7'MIN~ 'I I PLANTING STRIP 3/B" EXPANSION JOINT L / / I t I==F===========I NOTE: USE OPTIONAL APPROACH ONLY WHEN A SIDEWALK IS USED AT THE BACK OF THE APPROACH AND THE SIDEWALK IS SET BACK TO A MINIMUM OF 6' FROM CURB. HALF PLAN HALF PLAN 2'-6" 2'-6" MIN MIN MIN 12'-6"1 r-1'-3"MIN _f 1/2" MAX E31=-~~~======3i (BEVEL WHERE POSSIBLE) E==~~~==~==========:3_fl/~ MAX I..... ~ I (BEVEL WHERE POSSIBLE) HALF ELEVA]ON CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUmR SECTION SHOWN (SEE STANDARD PLANS FOR OTHER CURB DESIGNS) NOTES; 3/B" EXPANSION JOINT G··:;;· ··s·, i·, ~ .. ~.::::; .. ::;;.,:::; .... ::t!.::: .. ~ ... ~{ 6" MIN lB,1- THICKENED EDGE OF APPROACH TO FULL DEPTH OF CURB 1. A MINIMUM 3' WIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ALL PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBI.E AREAS. 2. CONTRACTION JOINTS oHALL BE PLACED ALONG SIDEWALKS AT IS' MAXIMUM SPACING. ALL JOINTS SHALL BE CLEANED AND EDGED. 3. INLETS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT RUNOFF DOES NOT FLOW PAST CURB RAMPS. 4. CURB RAMPS SHALL BE POURED AS A SEPARATE UNIT FROM THE SIDEWALK, ISOLATED BY EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL ON ALL SIDES EXCEPT AT END OF RAMP NEXT TO ROADWAY. 5. CHANGES IN LEVEL UP TO 1/4' MAY BE VERTICAL AND WITHOUT EDGE TREATMENT. CHANGES IN LEVEL BETWEEN 1/4" AND 1/2" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 1:2. 6' MIN PLANTING STRIP APPROACH MIN 6" THICK SIDEWALK IN APPROACH AREA R IS' MIN APPROACH PLAN 6. RAMP TEXTURING IS TO BE DONE WITH AN EXPANDED METAL GRATE PLACED AND REMOVED FROM WET CONCRETE TO LEAVE A DIAMOND PATTERN. THE LONG AXIS OF THE DIAMOND PATTERN SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CURB. GROOVES SHALL BE I/S" DEEP AND 1/4" WIDE. 7. CEMENT CONCRETE APPROACHES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF AIR-ENTRAINED CONCRETE CLASS 3000 AND MAY BE POURED INTEGRAL WITH CURB. DESIGNED ...;;M",A:.:,A __ ~_+--------------------------------~~_4--_+--~ DRAWN ...:.FP!..:H-=--__ 1---+--------------------+--+--+--1 CHECKED ...,M",A'-',A __ HALF ELEVA]ON CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUmR SECTION SHOWN (SEE STANDARD PLANS FOR OTHER CURB DESIGNS) OPTIONAL 3/B' EXPANSION JOINT -.L , ~.. ...... -'-6" MIN ." .:.:' L, lB' THICKENED EDGE OF APPROACH TO FULL DEPTH OF CURB SEC]ON B B CEMENT CONCETE smEWALK AND APPROACH DETAIUI ADOPTED Cl'lT OF Bih-ITO",nN OWG. NAME: FR-03 SP PAGE: F005.2 Engineering Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 Sixth Street South PH: (425) 827-2014 Kirkland. WA 98033 1 -800-945-8408 Klrkl.nd • Se.llle www.paceengrs.com FAX, (425) 827-5043 2 (TYP) ( ) ...p «:7-TYP ~~.;:y R~c""'.s....:F-\~' ~ ~ ~~. ..... .$</ ~<:i:> ..... r"'" .$< ..... "'" A ............ .......... SEE ZONING CODE FOR 6' MIN .......... _ /~DRIVEWAY OR ALLEY FOR MAX & MIN WIDTHS w u « lL I U « o D::: 0.. 0.. « ALTERNATE 1 SIDEWALK AND PLANTER STRIP ALTERNATE 2 SIDEWALK NEXT TO CURB (NO PLANTER STRIP) NOTES: ~ ~ 1 0" COMMERCIAL ZONE 6" RESIDENTIAL ZONE 10" COMMERCIAL ZONE 6" RESIDENTIAL ZONE THICKENED BASE OF CURB & GUTTER TO MATCH APPROACH THICKNESS ON COMMERCIAL APPROACHES. (TYP) 1. DUMMY JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED NOT TO EXCEED 15' C/C NOR LESS THAN 10' C/C. THEY SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3/16" IN THICKNESS AND SHALL BE 2-1/4" DEEP. 2. 1/2" THRU JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT BACK, SIDES AND FRONT (BEHIND CURB) OF APPROACH, AND IN CURB/GUTTER TO DUMMY JOINTS. 3. CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3000 AIR ENTRAINED. 4. ALL JOINTS SHALL BE CLEANED AND EDGED. 5. APPROACH SHALL NOT BE POURED INTEGRAL WITH CURB AND GUTTER, BUT MAY BE POURED INTEGRAL WITH STANDARD CURB (SEE DETAIL "A"). 6. SUBGRADE COMPACTION SHALL BE 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR. 7. APPROACH CENTERLINE TO MATCH THE DRIVEWAY/ALLEY CENTERLINE. 1" CURB AND GUTTER SHOWN HOWEVER, OTHER CURBS MAY BE USED. (SEE STANDARD PLANS) SEE DETAIL "A" SECTION A-A JOINT~ ~6" II 3/16" SCORE .> DETAIL A APPROACH WITH MONOLITHIC CURB SEE NOTE 5 CEMENT CONCETE APPROACH FOR DRIVEWAYS AND ALLEYS --...... ADOPI'ED CiTY OF DN'fON LINE THE APPROACH WIDTH WILL BE 10' WIDER THAN THE DRIVEWAY/ ,---,---------------.--.---, STAMWID PIAIIS IBl' DATI: 12/98 ALLEY WIDTH. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE CLASS "B" . " CRUSHED ROCK ALTERNATIVE STANDARD ASPHALT PAVING SECTION SCALE: NTS FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.o. BOX 1018 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 ED DATI: I-i;-;;;;;;::--_____ -ISCAII JUNE, 2004 AS NOTED OWG. NAME: FR01 N SP PAGE: Fooe PERMIT DRAWINGS MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE GRADING NOTES & DETAILS Call before you D~g. 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) JOB NUMBER 04441.00 SHEET C2.1 OF HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON, NAD 83/91 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. BASED ON HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 205 AND 1887. POINT 205 BEING A MON IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF BURNETT AVE AND 2ND ST,; POINT 1887 BINING A BRASS PLUG AT THE INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND WELLS AVE. VERTICAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON, NAVD 88 BASED ON CITY VERTICAL CONTROL MARK NUMBER 1939 WITH A PUBLISHED ELEVATION OF 11.383 METERS, 11.383 METERS X 39.37/12=37.345 FEET. ---~-,--'--~--------' -"--- , ,\ ,,'. "" ... .'1. ':.' 11",,'I,'/\"\" llil. W(li~) -,+._ .. _ .... -.-.... ,. _. -----," ... ~ -.. ~ .---- .~ ., . " -, c, , o , I' " \ . en i ! \ j/; \ ,t., \ !,' Ll ," '" '" '" '.', .. / , ,-, .. ' I' . i , i I 1 1 I, / / i , " ,. '. j EX IISPHALT i liT"" _ 1\' _ . . __ .• ;, \',' I I co;. _--'--I--~ (~ !.,+----,-_" _" " . :._, !~ ___ .~ "_' ____ ",,',' :·,'··t' .... : ... 'Ii 1--\'1 •• J •••• -.-\'." .. - '" '.-, .. 0~1--'- " I' '.' ,I,'" \,' , \ '"""-,-', .-....-. .-...... r. I~' '; . '; ,'. ':·1' ; ,r) ;, :. ''- f'. '''_ • ,,") , I ". r~ i'-, 1! II II ~!,) "':;- fl'· ". , , J. ")) .~ I-:;~ -;: ',,' , ~." ·c ',. h' :r.: -; no I :'If' .;: !L ~~,~t]'" T: i,:.,. '.' V~ !~. , ' , , , , ' " , ( ••• ; , _ . c .. \, \ j ,-'--."..-.... i "',1 --'.~ " ... 1.-. "'. I I, '\ -j ! J \ 'i,iiL I I ,I, ell l' ,-,-,±-.. ,f " -'.1' ,~J .,', " )1 l,' ;I~: :.? 11.' '.1 '.J, ,'or __ ... (. -_,!:' __ !).l;~f:.T!Y~:G_-_-·-·--~· , --, G ----•• -.•. --.. --. G ___ .. OJ \,~,,; If"', .. _-"--.. -:.S .'-.. '-.'_:'.:-:'':_~~'.-'""---'' .~"'--SS ---I'-'~R') / \ I --- -"_.......... .."'_._--_I".r . -----~-. 55 ---.-----.-.--?""',-"--,,~:; .. "---"-"-'''''RO·-···.Io,'··-----·-· \ I c ,~, ,> -'I] WW fJllL .:.;:,;\ -:.:::::.. ~'.::,.)\' , ----\1 \\\.'\ --.. -..... -. \ .~) --- 155: z§: "" -"';;-,-., (.J ..... ;~ ") 1"" ----__ ·'>I_~·· __ ::r·"·_··· .. ·~ ... _ BURNETT AVE. S. Engineering Penhallegon Planning Associates Consulting DESIGNED .cM:::.;AC-'-A __ _ ~~ _______________________________ -1---+---r~ 750 Sixih Street South PH, (425) 827-2014 Kirkland, WA 98033 1_800_945_8408 Kirkland • Seattle DRA~ ... F-,-,PH,--~ CHECKED ... M""A,-!-A ___ - I··· ..... Surveying Engineers, Inc. www.poceengrs.com FAX, (425) 827-5043 / / is! r---.. --' .... -----_. -.. -. '/ ... -"' .. -~. "-··~· .. ·"··I-···-·-· / '--'/-'--.", ... -.. -.. _" I , ,/ •••• 0 'n ., F1 . ',' -/--.. ------.· .. -0::; .. ___ ,_. __ .. j_,. --->'50 ..i MS AVE S., , .. (:. . ... -."'.~ ... --. (; _._._--··-.. _·1 ----+ .. -.. -.-7" r;---.-.----G--,----_ G ___ • W Il 12 ",TW riP -"·i··--'(";-·'''-~-··-··· .--'" G -'.' (, ~------- ---.---.,---.. " '1)----.-.--\---1 GRAPHIC SCALE _0" _____ --~ ---~ --.,.---•• ---.-.' - ;:-..... -.-•. -__ 0-. -.-_ .. -r ___ .. _ . ____ ~ __ .l_., __ •. _______ ._ • • tJGP!l/h' . lE a~ o:i 0') ,..,-) '~J II II ~ !~ IJJ ;:11 p- -.[. '='.~ :;f ~ ;;3 0) r,ci !Xj t'-J ,OJ ") I( II II ~~~. ~! ~0,1 flRlC~: Bl.DC If 105/107 FIN FI..~;r)H~'J0.15 )JO flfiSF)JU-I"1 SHT C2.1 907.83' };J!!.!:2!J!!~L-II)A TE DRIVEWAY {-._+. __ ... _,.5IiT_._C;Z.~:_·_·_L c 20 40 20 o 10 ,"" I 'I (" IN ···FEET -). ~J.1~J::;'~:'.:::,,,,.----__ -!(, .oo·o~ L I 1i~'~PHAL 1 RO)\DWP, \' ~ --- to (0 r<l _ -0> .-- ~); {0 r': t'l ,.'J ,~} II II II ~ I'~(:~~~ . uu rr.. ~'. "~ '.) () C) '-) ,~ ~rJ ~.(' CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER DETAIL SHT C2.1 1,lr:! f:ND0W. HAHIW//·m. :, i( )f,'f ..,.. .... " I ' 1 ,) --.-- n~,J f !.or.ll;: ,,-!,i).A '1/ • ~I -.- --1:·_·--'I '0/1···-----·----------. VI ,is ",~ ..•...... _ .. _. ll. 'II -... -, _ ... -- ..... G ---._-- .+ .... ,._--,'" .. -. --- -',,(~ -.- ,,"",-+,.--, -"" -- 1 ~;10fH . WOn!) HSE i! W', FiI'! rtJ)OR e' 3~,1 1.;(1 ---- .! '-- '. ,. --~ --PERMIT DRAWINGS Call before you D~g. 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERVICE JOB NUMBER 04441.00 FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 1018 JUNE, 2004 ,..J:ill:::§ID~L_-I SCALE 1 "0=20' -0" MERRILL GARDENS AT RENTON CENTRE GRADING & TESC PLAN SHEET C2.0 OF MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON, NAD 83/91 WASHINGTON CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY, A PRE- CONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE HELD BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON, THE APPLICANT, AND THE APPLICANfs CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE. --2~ VERIFY VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISri"rG ' UNDERGROUND UllL1TIES. CONTACT ALIL UTILITY COMPANIES THAT MAY BE EFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. THE ONE CALL NUMBER IS 1-800-424-5555. COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE. BASED ON HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS 205 AND 1887. POINT 205 BEING A MON IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF BURNETT AVE AND 2ND ST,; POINT 1887 BINING A BRASS PLUG AT THE INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND WELLS AVE. VERTICAL DATUM CITY OF RENTON, NAVD 88 BASED ON CITY VERTICAL CONTROL MARK NUMBER 1939 WITH A PUBLISHED ELEVATION OF 11.383 METERS. 11.383 METERS x 39.37/12=37.345 FEET. 3. MAINTAIN ALL EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 4. VERIFY GRADES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FLAG CLIEARING LIMITS. 5. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, FILTER FABRIC FENCE, SEDIMENT PONDS, INTERCEPTOR SWALES AND OFF-SITE CB PROTECTION AS INDICA TED ON PLAN. PERIMETER PROTECTION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR BEFORE NEXT PHASE BEGINS. 6. REMOVE TREES, STRUCTURES, ASPHALT, SIDEWALKS AND UTILITIES AS NOTI:D ON THE PLANS. 7. CLEAR & GRUB AREAS OF THE SITE TO BE ROUGH GRADED OR FILLED. B. REMOVE UNSUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL AS REQUIRED. 9. GRADE AND PLACE ACCEPTABLIE FILL AS REQUIRED AND COMPACT ACCESS DRIVE SUB GRADE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. INSTALL DETENTION VAULTS AND STORM CONVEYANCE SYSTEM. AT NO TIME WILL STORMWA TER RUNOFF BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE INFILTRAll0N CHAMBER LOCATED IN THE VAULT UNTIL CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN CLOSED OUT. 10. AS GRADING AND SITE WORK PROCEEDS ALL RUNOFF SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE WETVAULT PORll0N OF THE DETENTION VAULTS. THE INLET TO THE INFILTRAll0N PORll0N OF THE VAULT SHALL BE PLUGGED SO NO SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF WILL ENTER. THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT POND CAN BE REMOVED WHEN ALL RUNOFF IS DIRECTED INTO THE WATER QUALITY PORTION OF THE VAULT FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AS APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR. DIRECT ALL SURFACE WATER TO THE PROPOSED CATCH BASINS. NO UNCONTROLLED SURFACE WATER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE SITE AT ANY TIME DURING THE GRADING OPERATIONS USE BMP'S TO CAPTURE EDIMENT PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. 11. INSTALIL NEW UTILITIES. GRADE SITE. CONSTRUCT ASPHALT PAVING, ACCESS DRIVES, SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTlERS. COORDINATE WITH BUILDING CONSTlIUCTION. 12. COMPLIETE STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE PLANS. 13. REMOVE EXCESS EXCAVATED M,~TERIALS, TRASH DEBRIS, AND WASTE MATERIALS. DISPOSE OF IN AN AUTHORIZED LOCATION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 14. CLEAN STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE WATER QUALITY PORTION OF THE DETENTION VAULT OF ALL SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS. MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES UNTIL SITE IS COMPLETELY STABLE. LEGEND ASPHALT CONCRETE WATER VALVE HYDRANT WATER METER MANHOLIES (SS/SD) CB POWER /UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR POWER TRANSFORMER POWER/TELEPHONE VAULT TELIEPHONE/TV RISER GAS VALVE STREET LIGHT SPOT ELEVATION SIGN MAILIBOX ROCKERY CONIFER TREE DECIDUOUS TREE FOUND CASED MONUMENT SEl 5/8" IRON REBAR WI. YELILOW PL S'IIC CAP STAMPED L.S. #11691 UNLESS OTHERWISE STAllED. SET PK & WASHER STAMPED loS. #11691 SlllE BENCH MARK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED CENllER LINES ~~~~RO)!_W/I~?SLlNES DITCH UNES FLOW ~~rr,.I}..Ff~N~EWER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE GAS UNE UNDERGROUND PDWER LINES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINES CHAIN UNK FENCE SILT FENCE WOOD FENCE CURBING EXISTING I I L..:=J " -6- OHl@ o -0- €-- It;] IJ']IJJ D m OQQ~ ~) ·--w--'--55-- --50-- --G-- -<JGP- -<JG1---0----,--__ 0 __ REMOVE 1'/201 U2J ~ -+-+w++- "-+-T Sll-++ -,t----,L.....s[Y~ ..,.t-,........IG~ --r----t'-UGJ¥__+._ ~3T+-I-­ ~""O'-r-+ -r-"-~X/~ 7-7'--t'O/~ ////7(,9' PROTECT' i",J-,.~·· ~ /,'1, II 1,'1 :''In!LR B/\~~l!) Oil! ~OlJh!D Plll1li<'~ 1\10hl(, I.,/,\, ,r."'! '1',' '''-1'/' II' C''''"",! If"'" -._, ,! , ., i, I ,,,' I--;'n ~\J, I)')'~'{ ;,j' \ q '''lr::' "., " --, -- I / i '" '" " , ' '. i /1 ~ r f -, ;: i,' ,! ,1 ~ I JI, i/ ii"" il I ." I Ii . I ! { I I' , 'II I r 1/ :, \ 1(' -I 1\ Ii J, :' I \y ( :: I ~~I ii 1\-( :i I 'i) , II i . \ I' j ! ( " II 1: ( Ii I \ ;; Ii f; ( " ' ,I " I II I Ii if I I: / " 1;./ ;1/ I' :; I i '\ rii, i I' ' " .Jr'.!' , . i·j· f':' ,11" • I . " ... ~ f<'r). I .~ -, , ,I I '1 ,". , . ,_. j I • , I I',} I . \'/ . I _I; .... ; _-,-_' "_' I ,: -' , i \ l , I c' '. \ " ,r; ~t I') ._. ,., . , : I' f ,;~ .. : ,. , 'J,' ('-' ", ,,'I,'/,O ~. '--'-' -. ! I .~~, "··"w,,Z •.•. _.< :~'.'I :-.' __ .. ::'~,\ I ,',' , 'I _ ", ,. " -",~--~ -----f~ .. -~...,..-I- . ./ , ,. " -1 . , " \. " \ \ \ "'~'--'-,.~ -'---~ ,_ ~_~_ ,··\---1-·· /' I ,--:; . -. , \\'/1 ",,",·~.,t"" ;, n.;: " '.1: --'---'-~-~'):.....-'~ ;,1 il " .1 '" ,,, " "'. r' I' ~ci'J;;~" I ( '" '1 II II rJ 'I II (t, '/' -, 10 I [1 t') '.' ::> 'j (I) I ',' <I "; n?;' (,",' C',' n' l' 1'> II ;-II ',y, .; n ,,1 J:{u.,J. "-'C1 PROJECT NOTEs: ~ ;,; ~~ ;:< :=;: i5 -.-: - 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL fi)..VE THE M6!1t~CURRENT CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS ONSITE AT ALL TIMES, 2. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR REMOV~L, ABANDONMENT AND DISPOSAL FOR . 1ST. ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION VAULTS, JUNCTION BOXES, POLES, LIGHT STANDARDS A D LINES. I'; 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AGAINST r:ANDSCAPE PLANS FOR TREE REMOVAL. 4. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRAC'tbR SHALL LOCATE ALL SANITARY SEWE STUB LOCAll0NS AND ABANDON PER CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS. S. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RELOCATE ALL BENCHES ONSITE AND RE CA TE PER OWNERS DIRECll0N. DESIGNED JMB --'---- " ,> L." IiI.,) , . ,,' ..,' DRAI'iN -,-F-,-,-PH,--~ I--+--------------.------j--t--t--i CHECKED ",J""MB,--_ ~ -~ -._-------- ,- ------~~~.----.- UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: CAUTION: 'THE CONlRACTOR SHAll BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING 'THE LOCAll0N. DIMENSION. AND DEP'TH OF All EXISllNG UllUllES WHE'THER SHOWN ON 'THESE PLANS OR NOT BY POTHOUNG THE UllUllES AND SURVEYING 'THE HORIZONTAL AND VERllCAL LOCAll0N PRIOR TO CONSlRUCll0N. 'THIS SHAll INCLUDE CAlliNG UllUTY LOCATE 0 1-800-424-5555 AND 'THEN POTHOUNG All OF 'THE EXlSllNG .UllUllES AT LOCAll0NS OF NEW UllUTY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICAllY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFUClS EXIST, IF CONFUClS SHOULD OCCUR, 'THE CONlRACTOR SHAll CONSULT PACE ENGINEERING TO RESOLVE All PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WI'TH CONSlRUCll0N. Engineering Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 Sixth Street South PH: (425) 827-2014 Kirkland, WA 98033 1-800-945-8408 Kirkland • Seattle www.pnceengrs.com FAX: (425) 827-5043 ---- FRIEDMAN DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 1018 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 JGP ~'0."~~~~~:s3 2 STORY HS£. 0~ # 101/103 ~ ~IN FLOOR"~42. 7 ""', W/ PAR flAL 8Asn~FNT --... __ . % I" I){~t, Ii /1'1 000 (<..-' '" cri f~5 '0..., U II ~~ '" (., t-')' ;:.-~ ;, fL "..; I" 8f~ICI( eLOG 11 100/107 Fir) rLO:lfk39.75 NO BAC;~f,!noiT -- JUNE, 2004 SCALE fmm:~=-I 1"=20'-0" - 1/ ~",.', ',: GRAPHIC SCALE ------ ". o , ... __ .. 01', (») "I 0) 1'/ "J r'" II II --.. (,' ::::. ~. n: ',_ ~~ / " " .~ , (/: ?) In ('() ,r) .-c.,.- ,-", l(\ \-.. ", ." f') n II II ~ ~;~:~ u ,~ rn ,,' ;..--: Cl (', (') r.) () '-0 l{} 20 'Y::L," ~JI)(;N::: IIIl,RD':IM~i ,[(tIL ,I~J r I ~'lOR '\0 4 , ~~-------------'. ". EXIST BLDG-/ " ~- --jl'.'· , . -- PERMIT DRAWINGS MERRILL GARD.ENS AT RENTON CENTRE DEMOLITION PLAN 10 20 40 --'" -j Call before you D,g. 1-800-424-5555 UNDERGROUND SERIIICE (USA) JOB NUMBER 04441.00 SHEET C1.0 OF o i J ~ , § ~ I ~ ~ ! i ~ ll.' , , , ~ 1!, f . " " J If' :r:> I =-r~_ - ~ en --• I CD -C 0) ::::I I I I I -= " W a , a I Site Plan I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I --I. I I I I I ~ .. I I I I I I ~ I Ill~ t5g z. o. I 'z ., 0, h I ~" I I I~ I ",""",,,,,",,,,,,,,,,,,*,~' I T 19 ........... 19!1lOo 1 181" t ,,1,0 --'7""'?S"'"' r=7fill'" I :" I I I I I I :~ 'T I I I t - I I 1 : . I I[ L l!li _S-LI-L_ '~ '" / ~ 1 ! I. I II IT ,J I I lL U 1 c, ~ IJJ 1 r I U '1/ ~~ 1 '" I I _II I~ l r Im l I ~II. "too I I I • I II r'l' ,J I -1 IIiiI '" a""r0 I ,N aJ en " " ~ 0 -en I 0 tn- I I 1 . I I I I~ I I • / II I I : I I_ I I II H~OO .---j- I I I II I l1li11 .11., 1 I I II I~ n .11 L ~ 1\ ' I II L I ,~ I ] I I II I I Ii •• I II I \ I \ I \ I ,+ m \ 'Il ~ I " ~ \ ~ I '" ;>'( \ I § z \ I \ '" 1 1 I DATE , 06.14.04 SCAlE , I DRAWN BY , glh ~t" MERRILL G ARD ENS @ Renton Centre JOB NO., 2004.05 [04 Burnett Avenue S, DATE PLOTTED , 06.11.04 PERMIT SUBMITTAL Renton, Washington DWG NAME ,MGR-Slte NO. REVISIONS !i§ A11!1 ~ ~i ~ " ~ R rn cl a; fIl ~ • / / • 111 __ 2°foO II IiiI Iii . lliiil "too t SENTLEtwif tirE BUIL~T:) 4JYa51; \) REGISlERED ARCHllECT , CURTIS L BEATTIE , , SlAlE IF II\!IINGl1II DATE NO. REVISIONS DATE - -'." ---.-,-------_._, ,.,--,-...' -"r -- -'.',' , , ----" - - -. ,-------... --'----- -',' - --------.--, -' I I iii . II' . , , --: '\ " , .. _---- '" L ' , , -j :-_~-7 -'----_,,-. '0:00, ______ "_, "-, , , --,', --=>- _L -~, ;,," ------! ------------~------------~---------" j • , , \ , I, --------,~ I-~ ~-at~~ -'''' --'-i-,T-, ;', ." /)~y ". '> .,J~! -I ---. . IF -C' iF '~c-~~\\ .. ~~JC~lJ'L/ID " rJ1 -', f '-<IF"n, (!:ll:;bi '''_''1 ': ~~T . _ :':"_" b~------===-_=--. ,-- .~ '-.. ~ -. -' · ______ ,r II ------, ': '., -,-- CORNER PLAZA FEATURE WITe! TRELLIS ---I LSI~AI",ED ENTRy WALK WITI--I SMALL TRELLIS AND LOW FENCING- First Floor Landscape Plan LANDSCAPE SCHEoJ--'D~U~LE,=------___________ ~ ___ _ COMMON NAME SIZE/CONDITION SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME MF~~-------------------------------------------- DECIDUOUS STREET/SHADE TREES ACER RUBRUM 'RED SUNSET' CIRCIDIPH'l'LLUM JAPONICUM DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREES ACER CIRCINATUM o CORNUS KOUSA o ST'l'RAX JAPONICA EVERGREEN TREES o CHAMAEC'l'PARIS N. PENDULA o C~AMAEC'l'PARIS a. 'GRACILIS' @ THUJA OCCIDENT ALiS 'EMERALD' RED SUNSET RED MAPLE KATSURA viNE MAPLE KOUSA DOGWOOD JAPANESE SNOWBELL WEEPING ALASKA CEDAR HINOKI C'l'PRESS AMERICAN ARBORVITAE LARGE SHRUBS . ____________ _ © ViBURNUM P. TOMENTOSUM 'MARIESII' © RIBES SANGUINEUM ® S'l'RINGA VULGARIS ® M'l'RICA CALIFORNICA @ 05MANTHUS H. 'PURPUREUS' ® PIERIS JAPONICA 'FOREST FLAME' ® R~ODODENDRON 'LODERS WHITE' IV EUON'l'MUS ALATA 'COMPACTA' o CISTUS H'l'BRIDUS CD ROSA RUGOSA <2) viBURNUM T. 'SPRING BOUQUET' DOUBLEFILE ViBURNUM RED FLOWERING CURRANT COMMON LILAC PACIFIC WAX M'l'RTLE RED ~OLL 'l' -LEAF OSMANTHUS FOREST FLAME PIERIS LODERS WHITE RHODODENDRON COMPACT BURNING BUSH W~ITE ROCKROSE RUGOSA ROSE SPRING BOUQUET ViBURNUM 2" CALIPER, FULL, WELL-BRANCHED AT b' HT" B'B 5TRONG CENTRAL LEADER, MATCHED 2" CALIPER, FULL, WELL-BRANCHED AT b' HT, B'B STRONG CENTRAL LEADER, MATCHED 8'-10' HI., NURSER, GROWN, FULL, B'B, MULTI STEM MIN. (3) I" CAL STEMS, 2" CAL, WELL B"'ANC~ED, FULL, B'B 1-3/4" CAL, WELL BRANCHED AT 4' ~T., FULL, B'B MIN, b'-8' HT., FULL AND BUSH'l' TO BASE, B'B MIN. b' ~T" FULL AND BUS~'l' TO BASE, B'B MIN, 5'-b' HT., FULL AND BUSH'l' TO BASE, B'B 24"-30" Hr., FULL AND BUS~'l', CONT,OR B'B I,LLEY r , I , ' ! j ~;",';'. 8' rf~_I. , 'I -~ '-" S'l'MBOL 5CIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME o Gom~L{ (:.9ffiQl.!ter Litmy S'ZE/COND ITION o o Service Foy€r o L_oundry _2' Living ROQm ------------------ SMALl/MEDIUM SHRUBS @ CORNUS STOLONIFERA 'KELSE'l'I' @ LEUCOTHOE FONT ANESIANA ® NAND INA D. 'HARBOR DWARF' @) PINUS MUGO MUGO 0) SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'ANTHON'l' WATERER' 0) ILEX CRENATA 'HETtII' "" HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIREN5 '*' POL'l'STICHUM MUNITUM @I RHODODENDRON 'PJM' a BUXUS SEMPERVIRENS 'SUFFRUTICOSA' ® BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'ATROPURPUREA' o C:l viBURNUM DAVIDII EJ ' >, /' ',', . . .. PRUNUS L 'OTTO LU'l'KENS' -NATIVE GROUND COVER Mix 50% MA~ONI A REPENS 50% POL 'l'STIC~UM MUNITUM DWARF REDTWIG DOGWOOD DROOPING LEUCOTHOE DWARF HEAVENL'l' BAMBOO MUGHO PINE ANmON'l' WATERER SPIRAEA JAPANESE HOLL'l' BLUE OAT GRASS SWORD FERN P JM RHODODENDRON TRUE DWARF BOXWOOD RED LEAF BARBERR'l' DAviD viBURNUM ono LU'l'KEN LAUREL 15" -18" HT. , SPR., FULL AND BUSH'l', CONT. CREEPING MA~ONIA SWORD FERN ___ e'4=" "PeOTS • 18" O.c, OR I GAL CONT, • 24" O.c, TRIANG. SPACING. INSTALL THROUGHOUT PLANTING AREA SHOWN, INCLUDING UNDER TREES AND SHRUBS. .. EJ·· 'CGc::Rc:0c.U-=ND=,C",O=VE~R-==cc-~o= ______ ===== ________ 4~'=-' "P:::.OTccS~.c:18c:-," O.c. OR I GAL CONT, • 24" O.c., TRIANG. ARCTOSTAPH'l'LOS UVA-URSI KINNIKINNICK SPACING. INSTALL THROUG~OUT PLANTING AREA S~OWN, INCLUDING UNDER TREES AND S~RUBS, ,', ' RUBUS CAL'l'CINOIDES NO S'l'MBOL CLIMBING ViNES AT TRELLIS/ARBORS WISTERIA SINENSIS G£Ej----------:::: - - - -----:---::-:---------------------------- - - - - - - :: :::::::::::::::-=-:-: -:---- CLEMATIS MONT ANA 'RUBENS' PERENNIALS HEMEROCALLIS 'STELLA D'ORO' CALA'1AGROSTIS A 'KARL FORESTER' PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES 'HAMELN' CREEPING RUBUS I GALLON STAKED, I PLANT AT EACH TRELLIS POST ------------- CHINESE WISTERIA RED ANEMONE CLEMATIS STELLA D'ORO DMLlL, KARL FORESTER REED GRASS DWARF FOUNTAIN GRASS I GAL. CONT. AT 18" OC. . _L_A_WN_' __ _ __________ "SOD_LAW_N ___ _ SEE SPECIFICATIONS . ~ ... ".,,:, ,'. ,", ., .. ,' . ",.', ..... " >t': ' '.' .r. .. ' ---'--. - -C' :- B_QlLers / SQrinkl~is i ALLEY I I I I I I II r) I I I I I I I ~ Kirchen Office Office Assisted Dining o o Living Room o o F I I 10 I I o o [Jlvote Qlninq I rC'EC:OI',ATlly'E POTS WI FLAN'rS SiRE ET TREE IN GRATE AT 30' o.C, -~~-- -"-" ---- PLANTING NOTES L ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO BE WATERED WITCl AN AUTOMATIC WATER CONSERVING IRRIGATION SYSTEM, 2. ALL NEW SClRUB AND GROUNDCovER AREAS ARE TO BE MULCHED WITCl A MINIMUM 2" DEPTCl OF SPECIFIED MULCH. 3. W:-IERE GROUNDCQVER IS PROVIDED, IT S~ALL BE PLANTED At H-IE SPECIFIED SPACING TClROUGI-IOUT TClE BED, INCLUDING AREAS UNDER TREES AND SClRUBS, START FIRST ROW 12" FROM EDGE OF BED. 4. SEE SHEEL LL2 FOR SECOND AND FIFTH FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLANS OVER STRUCTURE AND PLANTING DETAILS. ~. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SITE AMENITY SCHEDULE S'l'MBOL !::I 00 o T'l'PE BACKLESS BENC~ BENCH W/ BACK TABLE TRA5~ RECEPTACLE DECORATIVE PLANTERS WITH ANNUAL COLOR AND ACCENT PLANTS TRELLIS STRUCTURE LOW ORNAMENT AL METAL FENCE }; STREET LIGHT I~{f--I TREE GRATE = -_-_c.:'.~ _ - -T-- , ----. - ------:::,:--' ---;.>---- ----------- N RTH - WEISMAN DESIGN GROUP~ 0' 10' 20' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ..... : 'Ii!il! '-"", i"Pii~ 2329 EAST MADISON STRE£f SEATTlE, WA 98112-5416 PH 206.322.1732/FAX 206.322.1799 INTERNET WWW.WDGINC.COM 40' 60' SCALE 1"~ 20'-0" II 'I '! N -< ~" ~IIII Sj"'1 uti' jill i , , I i --, , '" z: « .....I a.. W a.. « () (f) Cl z: « .....I 0: o o .....I u.. I-- (f) 0: w ! ~ « 0 - , ~ i z , 0. , ! "' '> w '" i • cj z L 1.1 -___ 1 _____ _ I , f r I I I I I I , , -1 --,----T-------r --J-__ l __ -' ____ J ---7---------- , ~ / / / / / ------" / / / / / j/ , , , , I I , , , , l ___ J , , , I , , I , , l i : --t-: --~-- , , I , , . __ L __ I , , I CO~MERCIAL , , ____ 1 II --, / / / / ---] .r-------____________ ...... ...., r ~~ II SITE I I , , , , I I I , I I I I I I RETAIL SURFACE PARKING I I I I I I I . I I I I , I I I I I I I I ___ ..J / -I-_..., , SURFACE PARKING_-----J ---- " J __ -- " VACANT ' , I COMMER., --------~~--r-·-----l ' , :, 1 ----------: 1 I --------___ L___ --_L __ ~___ -,,--J j -------~-~r~--r---r : I i ,/ COMMERC I Al ~ ------r I COMMER, i / : I , " I : i ' r···· :'1 r---r-' r~'1 SINGLE F AM I L Y : RET A I L! i " , , , ----------c.-.-.. L .... L. __ .. '.L ..... J L ... L ... L.L ... _U_._L-----· \ \ \ -, I I TWf;f'ffflf?! M r-------l ;---1----r---l--------1 I , , , I , , , I----------l , , I , , , r I I : :: I : i ~--L __ L __ ~__ __~ I , , , , , , , , iIIII' , , , , , , , L __ _ --------~---l----r----------------l----r---r--- I I: , " , COMMERC I AL Ii' , I i 1 : , "~ , "~""l -------------------------L--__________ l ____ : 1;-_ r--------r---1---------------------l--------1 i ., I, '---- ---l iIIII' , COM MER C I ALi i __ __ I , t, ....... l ... J ... J ............ _ .... L. _ ... J ill r------------l--------,--------r---l--------: I I I I I r i COMMERCIAL iii : , J -.. : . :: I '. . , . 1 I L ____________ -_______ --------l--_J ________ J :--------~---l--------,------------l--------1 /------i I: : 1 : MULTI FAMILY I 1 ' l J' " l ________ -----------l-------_____ J ________ J r--------r-------l----r---T-------------7 I I I I I I iii i i / I: : TRANSIT / 'PAR~ING I 1 Q: i' :: C E N T E R / ~ /1 i STRUFURE "I /9$ / i 'I I 1 ~/' 1 141""'1 , , : ::: / ;::41 / i L ---__ L_ -------'--' __ 1 ___ J _______ --'~ ~ ~ -L __ J / ,~" / 1 ...",. I iI'I 1 f/) ~ I r------------l------------------~:o~-~;/----l , : 1 I , , I 1 ",.. I , , 1 ~ ,",:,:: I , , 1 L ..., I , , 1 ,,~ I , , I,.~~I , L I~Q:I , --771 /1----__ ; 1 I , I I , L __ _ r---, , , , , , , , , f----, , , , , , , , , L ___ _ r----, L ___ _ ,-----, , , , , , , 1-----, , , , , , , 1-----, , , , , , L ___ _ r---- I I I I I I Nei hborhood Detail Ma 1" = 60'-0" - • . • ,-~I d 06·22-200412'41:38, HP1Q55.pc3 C:IProjlMenili Gard"ns-Renion 2004.05\Ne'ghborhoou p .n·v 9 wg, . ~ · « " · g ~ · « " ~.--.. r--... • -"-r u ttl -Q) o "'0 o o oJ:: ... o .c tlR"§' ~I' "(j) Z ~ RID6E LINE EL 1015' NOM. ~ ROOf LEVEL EL. Q35' NOM. ~ 5TH FLOOR EL 1lB.o' ~ 4TH FlOOR a.B5' ~ 3RDFLooR EL 64.0' ~ 2ND FlOOR EL 54.5' ~ 1ST FLOOR EL 3<15' o VERTICAL CEMENTITIOOS SIDING o PANEL I BATTEN CEMENTITIw.i SIDING (0 HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIw.i LAP SIDING -TIGHT EXP09RE o HORlWNTAL CEMENTITIw.i LAP SIDING -HORMAL EXPOSURE o METAL RAIL SYSTEM 0) VIIIl'l ~INDOH, lYP. o METAL COLUMN (0 BRiCK 8 HOOD TRELLIS 8 ALUMltIIM STOREFRONT SYSTEM @ HAlL +IOIJNTED LIGHT 8 SECIRITY LlGNTING e CAST -IN-PlACE CONCRETE @CMU e PORGH LIGHTING C:IProjl"Mrrili Gardens-Rantan 2GIM.OSI30IMGR-A301.dwg, 06-17-2004 14:18:15. HP1055 ~3 " , lO~ PARKING ). a.815· T Or---:=S,=T:::.:::Ob=in=::S=t. =(N=or=th==.:) E=le=va=ti=on====----,.,...1/16~"~I'_O" 'L IfllERNAL TR/6HJRE(;YClING ReOM ~ ISTFLOOR EL B<l5' BEYOND @ Building Section Or----:.:::Bu=rn=et=t ==Av=en=ue=====(W=es=:t)::::::E=le=va=tio=n ~1/16;-;;-::;"~I'-O'" O---:::::::MC=L=en=do=::n =H=ard=w=ar=e =(S:::::ou=th=) =Ele=v:::.:..::at~i~n~'~I'_O'" Or--::::AI~leY=(:::::::Ea=st==) ==Ele==v::::::::at=ion=============--=1/16;-;;-::;"~I'_O" ). ROOF LEVEl TEL. Q35' NoM. j> g A. STH FLOOR TEL.83.o' '" , ~ ). 4TH FlOOR T EL.15.5' :5' ~ ). 5RD FlOOR .,.. EL 64.0' j> ~ A. 2ND flOOR T EL. 545' " -, ',--'-" ~ ). 1ST FLOOR TEL.3<1.5' -- " -" ., '. , Building Section I h= CONCEALED ROOF rIELl.; MECH"'~CAL EOIJIPNENT AS REG!) , _ •. ''-,_:, c, ,- 1/16"~I'-O" (0 COMPOSITE ROOFING o VERTICAL CEMENTITIw.i SIDING o PANEL I BATTEN CEMENTITlw.i SIDING (0 HORZONTAL CEMENTITIw.i LAP SIDING -TIGHT EXP09RE o HORIZONTAL CEMENTITIw.i LAP SIDING -NORMAL EXPOSURE o METAL RAL SYSTEM 0) VINYL ~INDOH, TYP. o MErAL COlIJMN (0 BRICK 8 Y\Q()D TRELLIS 8 AlJ,!1lf11M STOREFRONT SYSTEM @ f'lAJL -MOUNTED LlGNT 8 SECURITY LIGHTING o CNJT-IN-f'LACE CONCRETE 8 GHJ e PORCH LIGHTING ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I( f-' St; ~I !§I:!:! "'0 I ~!li! ~ !J ~ ~ ~ i3 r II~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ; r ~ ~ (~l---t-t-H-Il--l <l) .b ~ <l) u $::I 0 ..... $::I <l) ~ @) I/J. tJ) Z ~ r:: 0 ~ .--(.) Q) ~ (J) ( I "C d r:: ~ ~ tJ) ~ r:: 0 ~ .-gz -~ > r Q) ~ -w ~ 0) r:: .-"C -.-:::s m A3.1 TRELLIS STRUCTURE ~_+~t-_--PRIVACY LATTICE CLIMBING ViNES A--LC'l" PLANTER WALL 0f-----=L=-A=-R:.=G-=E~T-'-R=E=LL=I_=_S_=E=L=EV_'__'A_=_T:..:.IO~N ____ _ NTS I I I IF- L LARGE TRELLIS AND FLANTER I":E-=-=-"'-£=="~ VIEW TERRACE COMMON AREA FRIVATE FAT lOS ---------~-c-,,-------- Fifth Floor Landscape Plan / LARGE SCREEN TRELLIS .L_~ AND FLANTER ~;"~ ~~ ! <:: i , I I ~. I~ I TRELLIS STRUCTURE ,----EN1'RY WALK TO GROUND FLOOR UNITS ~-~C'W ORNAMENTAL ~IET AL FENCE CD SMALL TRELLIS ELEVATION Bf--------~--------­NTS . i I~ I ,. ~~ ~LARGE TRELLIS l FREEST ANDING FLANTER FRlvATE FATIOS L./DECOR'AA'TIVE FO"S -L-ACTIVITY ROOM FLMA COMMON AREA WITI--I ACCENT FLANTS Second Floor Landscape Plan 1:> co c ~~r----BROADLEAF TREE r---112" DIA BLACK RUBBER H05E r---Il GA WIRE iI\ll_~~--(3) lXl HEM-FIR STAKE5 INTO 5UBGRADE ,----5PECIFIED MULCH ~-FINI5H GRADE PULL BURLAP OFF TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL IMPORT TOP50lL (SEE SPEC5) "---UNDI5TURBED NATIVE 50lL OR COMPACTED PLANTING BACKFILL ni'!fil'"n1!lifil"----BREAK UP SIDE5 AND BOTTOM OF PIT DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING NTS _-==~~~~:~~~:,~~TREE' 5EE LANDScAPE TYPE FRAME,SEE _____ lXl HEM-FIR 5TAKE DRIVEN TO REFU5AL 5ECURE TO TREE WITH (l) 5TRANDS NUR5ERY -MAN'5 TAPE POINT TOP OF 5TAKE TOWARD PREVAILING WIND l"'---5pECIFIED MULCH :-'4"----FINI5H GRADE ,--Ir--lpOI~T TOp50lL (SEE 5pEC5) PULL BURLAP OFF TOP 113 OF ROOTBALL PLANTING BACKFILL ~~-UNDI5TURBED NATIVE 50lL OR COMPACTED PLANTING BACKFILL '--BREAK UP 51 DES AND BOTTOM OF PIT, 0~'ERGREEN TREE PLANTING ~ T1-41CKENED PAvEMENT EDGE AROUND PiT ~~\:~~~~~~:~;I (3) DIAGONAL I@GA.2x4eANDCABLE,A6 GAL I 5TEEL CABLE5 ACROS5 5PECIFIED ABOVE i"O. 4 REBAR, COi-.liij-.lUOU5 CONCRETE PAVING: GRATE AND FRAME A6 SPECIFIED 5PRINKLER >4EAD, SEE IRRi;:;;ArION PL,l,\l'IS CD ROOT BALL, CABLE MIN. 4" FROM TRUNK PEEL BACK BURlAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL seT TREE FLUMB &IDEWALK/PAVING PLANTING BACKFILL, 5EE 5PEC5 (4) PRESSURE TREATED 2x4s, siZE TO lUlllil~~ FIT TREE PIT, NAIL TOGETHER IN ARRANGEMENT SI-lOWN. 2X4e TO REST oN EXI5TING 5UBGRADE ____ -SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SiDES OF FIT. IN5URE PIT DRAIN5 PRIOR TO PLANTING AND BACKFILL NOTIFY OllNER'5 REP, IMMEDIArEL y OF ANY DRAINAGE PROBLt=M5. MIN. SQUARE PIT SECTION STREET TREE IN GRATE NTS ------------------ r---PLANT S~RUB5 AT 5AME GRADE A5 NUR5ERY ---FOLD BACK OR REMOVE BURlAP 0,---FINI51-i (,RADE ~-5pECIFIED MULC~ r--IMpORT TOP50lL (5EE SPECS) ---PLANTING BACKFILL ~-BIB OR CONTAINER A5 SPECIFIED ~---UNDI5TURBED NATIVE 50lL OR ~-t COMPACTED PLANTING BACKFILL fF\_~!j_RUB PLANTING V-Nl'S- I ~ sIq ; ,~ ~~ .~ l'~ . 11m. ,,, X~ IX ~LD K . II If" r l- LRAI5ED COMMUNITY GARDENS COMMON AREA ". , . .'. , " , ", .:. .' :. .:.;'::':'" .' J 5'-0" SQUARE 1 SIDEWALK OPENING PLAN v CONe. I~AVEMENT SEE CiviL SECTION AT FRAME NORTH . 6PECII=IED MULCH PLANTING BACKFILL WEISMAN DESIGN GROUP~ 0' 10' 20' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE < 5 2329 EAST MADISON STREET SEAmE, WA 98112·5416 PH 206.32217321FAX 206.322.1799 INTERNET WWW.WDGINC.COM z 40' 60' SCALE 1"= 20'-0" I I • I w . , >-<{ i 0 ! ~ z 0 '" i > I w '" I I ci z I'ill hi '<t " '" , '" ":I <{ u ~ (/) z « ...J 0.. W 0.. « () (/) C z « ...J a: o o ...J u. :r: I-u. -u. Cl z « c z o () w (/) I I .1 I III 0-, " 0 w -- 1= w >-~ ro 0 ci ~ z "-z ~ z w (!) ro ~ ~ '" 0 0 , 0 L1.2