The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-05-066DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM May 9,2006 Plan Review, Fire Keri Weaver x 7382 . ~ITY OF RENTON 111-,[ DLf'1':f1~ i,.iiIT Harrington Square Site Plan Modification -LUA-05-066 Attached is a proposal for a administrative minor modification of the approved Harrington Square site plan, pursuant to Chapter 4-9-200, subsection J. Please review and provide your comments to me no later than May 23, 2006. +, .' ., CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WO.RKS MEMORANDUM Date; September 13, 2005 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M. Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following Information to facilitate project closeout and Indexing by the City Clerk's Office. . ,~ , . Project Name: Springbrook Wetlands Borings LUA (file) Number: LUA-05-066, SME, CAR Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Jill (Hall) Ding Acceptance Date: May 23,2005 Applicant: WSDOT Owner: WSDOT Contact: Terry Drochai<, 1-405 Project Team, WSDOT ) PID Number: 2523049004; 2523049019; 1253810230; 1253810170; 1253810090; 1253810240; 3623049002 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: ; Administrative Approval: June 6, 2010 Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: , By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The proposal Is for geo~echnlcal bornlngs In the Springbrook wetlands and within 200 feet of ) Springbrook Creek, willen are within tile Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction, for the eventual creation of tile Springbrook Creel< wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 7 of those 12 located within the City's shoreline boundaries. The sl10reline deslgnEltlon for the location of tllese borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program is , Conservancy. Location: Units A and B are east of OElksdale Avenue SW and South of SW 27th Street, Unit C Is west of Oakesdale Avenue SW between SW 27th Street and SW 34th Street, Uillt D Is north of 43rd Street and east of BNSF rigllt-of-way, and Unit E Is east of Oakesdale Avenue SW and soutl, of SW 34th Street. Comments: .. , " : " ":.',( i I ",:'e'!, I ""',':, I I'" , , i, ' < : ".;: ~ ""'!'~;';, ,:iiClrYOF,REr\JTON :" , .':",;:" 'I ,,)'''::',: : I, "'.' :C'ERTIFICATE'OF: EXEMPTION:.FROM', '.: ':' ;:'::, • SHORELINESUBSTANTIAL'oEVELOPMENT;PERMIT , I • i .,. I ~ , . -I • • ., . , ~ • " !. . : I, ;;, '" I.' '" • \ L, " • !,' "I "0\ It·" : I', . EXEMPTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: APPLICANT/CONTACT: PROJECT MANAGER: PROPOSAL: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODYIWETLAND: June 7,2005 LUA-05-0BB, SME, CAR Springbrook Wetlands Borings Shoreline Exemption City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Washin~ton State Department of Transportation BOO 108 h Avenue NE Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Jill Hall, Associate Planner The applicant is proposing geotechnical bornings in the Springbrook wetlands and within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, which are within the Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction. The borings will provide soil information pertinent to site work for the eventual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 7 of those 12 located within the City's shoreline boundaries. The shoreline designation for the location of these borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program is Conservancy. Units A and B are east of Oaksdale Avenue SW and South of SW 2ih Street, Unit C is west of Oakesdale Avenue SW between SW 2ih Street and SW 34th Street, Unit D is north of 43rd Street and east of BNSF right-of-way, and Unit E is east of Oakesdale Avenue SW and south of SW 34th Street. (See page T02 of Attachment A) 25-23N-4E; NW 1,4 30-23N-5E; NE 1,4 36-23N-4E Springbrook Creek, and associated Springbrook Creek wetlands An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described on the attached form for the following reason(s): Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc Site exploration and Investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an application for development authorization under this chapter, if: (i) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of the surface waters; (ii) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment including but not limited to fish, wildlife; fish or wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values; (iii) The activity does not involve the installation of any structure, and upon completion of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity; (iv) A private entity seeking development authorization under this sect/on first posts a performance bond or provides other evidence of financial responsibility to the local jurisdiction to ensure that the site is restored to preexisting conditions; and (v) The activity is not subject to the permit requirements of RCW 90.58.550. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT XX Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. N/A Attachments: Attachment A cc: Applicant File Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. The Master Program. ~~ioi ~~ fvv jJ~1 Wot17 Ne Watts, Director Development Services Division DATE: LAND USE FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: Applicant: PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT LOCATION: ',' . " , CIT~:'OF'~ENTON ' " " EX'E:' M,J:" T 1 0:':'N:, FROM CR'ITicAl.rAREAS REGUtJA~'6N'S' ' , ," ',"'I: " ., ...... June 7,2005 LUA-05-066, SME, CAR Springbrook Wetlands Borings City of Renton Washington State Department of Transportation Jill Hall, Assoicate Planner Parcels 2523049004, 2523049019, 1253810230, 1253810170, 1253810090, 1253810240, and 3623049002 PROPOSAL: Geotechnical bornings within the Springbrook wetlands for the eventua.l creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 4 of them being located within wetlands. 3 of the borings will be located within site C (2 borings will be located within the class III wetland and 1 boring will be located within the class II wetland), and 1 boring will be located within the class II wetland on site D. The borings will be drilled using either a truck drill or a track drill. The truck drill will be used when the soil conditions are not soft along the access to the boring locations. The track drill will be used when the soil conditions are soft and are not suitable for the truck drill. When the boring is completed, the boring hole will be back filled with bentonite per Washington State Department of Ecology requirements. The drilling slurry and soli cuttings will be transferred into sealed drums and disposed of off-site. After removing the drill from the boring location, the area will be restored to original condition and, if necessary, native grass seed and straw will be spread over any disturbed areas. . CRITICAL AREA: Springbrook wetlands (Class II and Class III) EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5 Research and Site Investigation of the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby granted for the following reason(s): X Site Investivative Work: Site investigative work necessary for land use application submittals such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests and other related activites. Investigative work shall not disturb any more than 5 percent (5%) of the critical area and required buffer. In every case, impacts shall be minimized and disturbed areas shall be immediately restored at a 1:1 ratio. DECISION: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5: H:\Olvlslon,s\Oevelop,ser\Oev&plan,lng\PROJECTS\05-066,JIII\Springbrook Wetlands Critical Area Exemption,doc Page 1 of 1 · .j~""''''''P; :",,"·~o ; ,:.~" -·_· .... ·1' :31' . ! --" .....,.~iO._.,. ,~ DATE: LAND USE FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: Applicant: PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT LOCATION: I" I:;' .'.,-: June 7, 2005 LUA-05-066, SME, CAR Springbrook Wetlands Borings City of Renton Washington State Department of Transportation Jill Hall, Assoicate Planner Parcels 2523049004, 2523049019, 1253810230, 1253810170,1253810090,1253810240, and 3623049002 PROPOSAL: Geotechnical bornings within the Springbrook wetlands for the eventual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 4 of them being located within wetlands. 3 of the borings will be located within site C (2 borings will be located within the class III wetland and 1 boring will be located within the class II wetland), and 1 boring will be located within the class II wetland on site D. The borings will be drilled using either a truck drill or a track drill. The truck drill will be used when the soil conditions are not soft along the access to the boring locations. The track drill will be used when the soil conditions are soft and are not suitable for the truck drill. When the boring is completed, the boring hole will be back filled with bentonite per Washington State Department of Ecology requirements. The drilling slurry and soil cuttings will be transferred into sealed drums and disposed of off-site. After removing the drill from the boring location, the area will be restored to original condition and, if necessary, native grass Seed and straw will be spread over any disturbed areas. CRITICAL AREA: Springbrook wetlands (Class II and Class III) EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5 Research and Site Investigation of the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby granted for the following reason(s): X Site Investivative Work: Site investigative work necessary for land use application submittals such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests and other related activites. Investigative work shall not disturb any more than 5 percent (5%) of the critical area and required buffer. In every case, impacts shall be minimized and disturbed areas shall be immediatelv restored at a 1:1 ratio. DECISION: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5: H:\Olvision.s\Oevelop.ser\Oev&plan.lng\PROJECTS\05·066.JIII\Springbrook Wetlands Critical Area Exemption.doc Page 1 of 1 1. The activity is not prohibited by this or any other chapter of the RMC or state Or federal law or regulation; 2. The activity will be conducted using best management practices as specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or scientific principles; and, 3. Impacts are minimized and, where applicable, disturbed areas are immediately restored, unless the exemption is a wetland below the size thresholds pursuant to RMC 4-3- 050.C.5.f.1 alJd f.2. SIGNATURE: 6/6/0 ~at. Planning/Building/Public rks Department EXPIRATION: Five (5) years from the date of approval (signature date). H:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.lng\PROJECTS\05-066.JlIl\Sprlngbrook Wetlands Critical Area Exemptlon.doc Page 2 of 2 PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 RAN DUM May 31, 2005 Jill Hall Mike Dotson' Springbrook Wetlands Borings -LUA 05-066, SME, CAR The following Utility and Transportation comments concern the Environmental and Application review for the subject project. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -These projects site locations are within the e 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure is approximately 77psi. The sit~s are outside the Aquifer Protection Area. SE\VER -There are Sewer mains located in this vicinity. SURFACE 'VATER -The sites drain to Green River via Springbrook Creek and the Black River Pump Station. STRI~ETS -Public streets sUITound the sites. CODE REQUIREMENTS llnd RECOMENDATIONS J. Utility locates should be required prior to borings; especially at the south end of Site 'D,' adjacent to SW 431'd Street. CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and City of Renton staff review and approval. cc: Ronale! Straka Kayren Kittrick 1:11'1:111 i{cvicwll'hlll ReviclV 20051Wctlund boring 1405 gF.doclcol' CIty of F In Department of PlannIng / Building / Public f(s ENVIRONMENTAL & DeVELOPMENT APPLICATlvN REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PIM =RevlfJ...~ COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 6,2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05·066 SME CAR DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 23 2005 APPLICANT: WDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Hall PROJECT TITLE: Springbrook Wetlands Borings PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 135.47 acres BUILDING AREA (Qross): N/A AlA" " .. " ~.".' LOCATION: Springbrook Wetlands WORK ORDER NO: 77433 ,":', .. •• «. 71005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal Is for geotechnical bornlngs In the Springbrook wetlands a·~~r~rth~[~bO=-.fee.~ of Springbrook Creek, which are within the Shoreline Management Act Jurisdiction, for the eve.ntual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 7 of those 12 located within the CIty's shoreline boundaries. The shoreline designation for the location of these borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program is Conservancy. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS e/omont of tho Proboblo Probablo Moro Elomon' of tho Probablo Probable Moro envlronmont Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Envlronmont Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Nocossary earth Housing Air Aesthellcs Water LlghtIGlare Plants Recreation LancVShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation environmental Health Public SeN/ces energy/ Natural Resourcos Histor/c/Cu/tural ProseNailon Airport environment 10,000 Feol 14000 Feel B. POLICY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS -~-~- We have reviewed this apmlcatlon with particular attent/on to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional 'fffOrr t/on Is needed to properly assess thIs proposal. ~b/ jt:?';- Date ' .', ,',' :.' -: ,:"'. ~; ..... City of Re .... ,m Department of Planning / Building / Public h .... ,kS ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6'u. COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 6 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-066, SME, CAR ',1,'(,' i.'·. ,'r rl ,(',r' '\'/',,- .. ~, •• 1' , " "" DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 23, 2005 APPLICANT: WDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Hall PROJECT TITLE: S rin brook Wetlands Borin s PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 135.47 acres BUILDING AREA ross: N/A LOCATION: Springbrook Wetlands I WORK ORDER NO: 77433 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is for geotechnical bornings in the Springbrook wetlands and within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, which are within the Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction, for the eventual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 7 of those 12 located within the City's shoreline boundaries. The shoreline designation for the location of these borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program is Conservancy. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacta Necessary Earth ... Housing Air Aesthetics Water L1ahtlGlare Plants " Recreation LancllSllOreline Use " Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I 1}frY"v- C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS 1/11 Illy {ottth.4 I3Jl~ ~ ~I--(l;;Jn I1-J @ ~tpJft... ~ (J f' .6w ,/3t"t/ ;I-!N( II b~ ~ We have reviewed this application with parllcular attention to those areas In which we have experllse and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where allnformatio· neede properly assess this proposal. Date I I City of F m Department of Planning I Building I Public 'ks ENVIRONMENTAL & D,;VELOPMENT APPLICATtl:lN REVIEW SHEET \ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~/L~~ COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 6, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-066, SME CAR DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 23 2005 APPLICANT: WDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Hall PROJECT TITLE: SPJlngbrook Wetlands Borings PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 135.47 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: Springbrook Wetlands I WORK ORDER NO: 77433 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal Is for geotechnical bornlngs In the Springbrook wetlands and within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, which are within the Shoreline Management Act Jurisdiction, for the eve,ntual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 7 of those 12 located within the City's shoreline boundaries. The shoreline designation for the location of these borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program Is Conservancy. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elomont of tho Probabla Probable Moro Eloment of the Probable Probablo Moro Envlronmont Minor Mojor Information Impacts Impacts NOcOssary EnvIronment MInor Mojor Information Impacts Impacts Necassary EllI1h Houslna Air ABsthet/cs Water L/(JhtIGlaro Plants RecreatIon LancVShorel/ne Use UtilitIes Animals Tronsoortat/on Environmentnl Health Public SeNlces Energy/ Natural Resources Hlstor/clCulturol ProseNailon Airport Environment to.ODO Feet t4 ODD Feel B. POLICY-RI:LA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~0/lJ-N)~~ ID ~1kJ. --- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas w re addlt/onallnfonnatlon Is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date s)t 7jl:s , .' .~~ + .. ~~ •• 'CITY OF ·RENTON .. ~'II . '. ~ , . , .' . PlannjngIB~._ ~g/Pu1?licWor~ D¢phltni~n( . "-", Kolhy·Keolkcr.Wheeler. Mayor. Gregg'Zlmmerman ,P.E., AdmlnlStrato.r May 23. '2005 .. ' Terry-Droctiak . 1-405 Project Team. WS'Dor:' . '600 loath Averiue N E' #405' . Believue,WA ~8004' .' . , . ' 'Subje'ct: , 'Sprlnbrbbk Wetlahds, Borings' LUA~05-066, SM$,CAR ' . I ' ... ~.: '., , . .':: "" . ~ :~; . ~. ~ ' .. ~ DearMr; Drochak; "",: . -.:.-. ,'i. rhe Deve,19pment 'Plannlng)~i~'e.ction. of me 'CitY of '.~~~~~~\:~as' (determined that the subject' application ,'Is c.oniple~~ .;'acc6'rdlng 'to:·~nJbll1ittal "r'e.quire.ments 'and" th:er~fore, . is , ,accepted Jor review.. ~', '-.",,' .,' ';", " .' ": . ": , '" "," :;:Y' .,\.~':;':;':\\~ .', ' , . ~ . You'wlli be notified it' ar:lY additlcma('lr:iio~rnatloh''js,ieqLiir~d:,t6'·coht;'nue proce.sslrig·your:' . 'apPliCatlon~," ." ,'" .\!. ": .... , ... ,_i::,:·'·(:·::~i.;,.;:~l::.~-;;.~::'.~~::;~,:" ..... :.~, ... ~;,,::::~. " .... :, ' .. ,' "-:" Please oo,rltact me 'at (425). 43Q-721~·if.'Y6iJ hav.e:anyquesti~:rs .. - .. , . . ,,' ::', '!".: Sincerely I> ' "'. ..... :,'." .' >,:' .. :i. ',: ~t'~J"ill.'H'all"~'" lUJ,.' ..... '.' ",\{,;:,.,.: ,,'" ~ ",I ... ,'" ':: :; ,::: ' ',' .1 , ,', .: . ',: . .. ' . . . , , " ..... ',':" ,~ '. ;:' ------1 O-S-S-S-ou-t-h -O-ra-dy-W-ay---R-e-nt-on-.-W-a-sh'-in-g-to-n,..-· 9-8-0S-S----..,.--i~ * This paparcontalns 60% rocycted ml;ltor1al. 30% post consu~r AHEAD OF THE CURV.E 'II •• ~ City of Renton OEvgtf:~NrPf:AN. LAND USE PERMIT N.' RENfO,.l~/NG ~y 1. 9 2005 MASTER APPLICATIO~CEIVED PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Geotechnical Borings ADDRESS: 600 108th Ave. NE, Suite 405 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Unit A: Southwest of the intersection of SW 2ih St. and CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 Lind Ave. SW Unit B: Southeast of the intersection of SW 2ih st. and TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 456-8500 APPLICANT (If other than owner) SW 34th St. Unit C: West of Oakesdale Ave. SW, between SW 2ih St. and SW 34th St. Unit 0: North of 43rd St., east of BNSF Right-of-Way Unit E: East of Oakesdale Ave. SW, south of SW 34th NAME: Allison Ray St. --KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): COMPANY (If 1-405 Project, WSDOT UCO applicable): 2523049004,2523049019,1253810230,1253810170, 1253810090, 1253810240, 3623049002 EXISTING LAND USE(S): ADDRESS: 600 108th Ave. NE, Suite 405 Employment Area -Valley, Conservation Area CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): NI A EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER (425) 456-8500 N/A PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CONTACT PERSON (if applicable): NI A EXISTING ZONING: Exempt NAME: Terry Drochak PROPOSED ZONING (If applicable): NI A COMPANY (If applicable): 1-405 Project Team SITE AREA (In square feet): NI A ADDRESS: 600 108th Ave. NE, Suite 405 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): N/A (425) 456-8595; terry.drochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (If applicable): NI A Q:web/pw/devserv/rorms/planning/rnasternpp.doc 05/18/05 '.' , .. ~ PRe ZCT INFORMATION continl J - NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (If applicable): N/A PROJECT VALUE: Approximately $25,000 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (If applicable): IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF N/A ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE (If applicable): BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL IJ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. BUILDINGS (If applicable): N/A IJ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL IJ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable): N/A ./ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES N/A sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (If ./ WETLANDS applicable): N/A N/A sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following Information Included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION _, TOWNSHIP _, RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. The legal description of the site parcels can be found on sheet T02 of the attached drawings. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) ~ l f?-..I\.Aj , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property Involved In this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers here n contained and the Information herewith are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .,.,..pl-t+J~~----:-""""'~,c.,--:7 k 1\ !\~ ~ 1 ~ signed this Instrument and acknowledged It to be hi e their free and voluntary t for the /1 \ V V \ ~ uses and purposes mentioned In the Instrument. (Signature o~p=tatlV6; (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary My appOintment explres:_-""3_----'-/ ..... 7'---....::(}::...~"__ __ Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planninglmnsterapp.doc OS/18/0S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,~, . I I I I I I I I ~N\NG oE.,!C\ ("'P'At~ENfON 600 -108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Main 425-456-8500 Fax 425-456-8600 May 18,2005 Ms. Jill Hall \At.:{ \ 9 100S Rt=.CE\\JEO City of Renton, Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Re: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SSDP) Exemption and Critical Areas Exemption request for proposed Geotechnical borings to be located within critical areas and the regulated shoreline boundary for Springbrook Creek. Dear Ms. Hall: MS: NB82-250 The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 1-405 Project Team is currently designing the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank, which is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Renton. Additional geotechnical information in the form of geotechnical test borings is required to complete the geotechnical baseline condition and design documents. The geotechnical data collected will be used to assist in the design and development of the Wetland Mitigation Banking Instrument, design and construction plans. A detailed description of the proposed geotechnical boring activity is included with this letter as . Attachment I. Also attached to this letter is a set of drawings that includes a neighborhood detail map, site plan and legal description of the site parcels. The location of each proposed boring within critical areas and the regulated shoreline boundary for Springbrook Creek is described below: ~ • Five geotechnical borings are proposed on Site C. Three of the proposed borings (SBC-I, SBC-4 and SBC-5) are located within an existing City of Renton wetland complex immediately west of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The two remaining geotechnical borings (SBC-2 and SBC-3) are located in uplands outside of critical areas. Though the wetland complex is connected hydr010gically, portions of the wetland complex are rated independently per the current Washington State Department of Ecology Wetlands Rating System. TIle wetland ratings are outlined in the Wetland Delineation Report and required buffers are indicated on the site location drawings (see attached vicinity and site location map sheets 5-8). The proposed boring locations are over 2,000 feet west of the OHWM of T:IEnvironmental (Conidor)IEEl\Springbrook EEl\PcnniliinglSpringbrook EEl Geotechnical Boring Material.IOeotechnical Boring. SSDP Exemption Request Letter -Renton -5-16·05.doc :7: Washington Stato ./1 Doportmont of Tronsportotlon Page 2 of 6 Springbrook Creek. However, the shoreline zone in this location is designated by the City of Renton as Conservancy Environment and includes al1 directly associated wetlands adjacent to Springbrook Creek, even though they may extend beyond 200 feet from the OHWM. • TIlree of the proposed borings (SBD-I, SBD-2 and SBD-3) are located on Site D. Two of the borings are located in uplands in the middle of an existing private dirt/gravel road immediately north of SW 43rd Street. One of those borings (SBD-I) is located 132 feet northwest of the OHWM of Springbrook Creek (see attached vicinity and site location map sheet 9). The shoreline zone in this location is designated by the City of Renton as Urban Environment and extends 200 feet landward from the OHWM of Springbrook Creek. Boring SBD-3 is located in the wetland on site D (see attached vicinity and site location map sheets 9-10) • Four of the proposed borings (SBE-l, SBE-2, SBE-3 and SBE-4) are located on Site E in uplands on a parcel immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. There are no jurisdictional wetlands on Site E, however, borings SBE-l, SBE-2 and SBE-4 are located within 200 feet of the OJ-JWM of Springbrook Creek. Spatial1y related to Springbrook Creek, boring SBE- 1 is 43 feet northwest of the OHWM, SBE-2 is 148 feet northwest of the OHWM and SBE- 4 is 55 feet northwest of the OHWM (see attached vicinity and site location map sheets 11 and 12). The shoreline zone in this location is designated by the City of Renton as Conservancy Environment and extends 200 feet landward from the OHWM of Springbrook Creek. Since the proposed work is located within critical areas and the regulated shoreline boundary of Springbrook Creek, WSDOT requests a Critical Areas Exemption and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SSDP) Exemption from the City of Renton to perform these geotechnical borings. TIlis proposed geotechnical boring activity constitutes "research and site investigation" and is, therefore, exempt from the standard requirements of the Critical Areas Ordinance per RMC 4-03-050(C)(5)(b)(ii). The proposed geotechnical borings are also exempt from the Shoreline Development Permit process based on RCW 90.58.030(3)(e)(xi), which states that: " ... The fol1owing shal1 not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this chapter: (xi) Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an application for development authorization under this chapter, if: (A) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of the surface waters; (B) The activity wiJI have no significant adverse impact on the environment including, but not limited to, fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values; (C) TIle activity does not involve the instal1ation of a structure, and upon completion of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity." Page 3 of 6 The proposed geotechnical boring activity will not interfere with normal public use of Springbrook Creek. The proposed activity does not involve the instaIlation of a structure, and upon completion (> of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity. The geotechnical borings wiIl have no significant adverse impacts on the environment based on the following: • The time duration of the activity is limited. The twelve total geotechnical borings will be completed in twelve work days. • The number of geotechnical borings within critical areas and shorelines has been minimized to the greatest extent feasible (only 12 total borings, 3 of those are not in shorelines or critical areas). • No trees are anticipated to be removed as a result of the geotechnical boring activities unless unforeseen site conditions arise during onsite operations. • The boring locations are in areas that are easily accessible by the work vehicles. Most of the borings are accessible using existing roads or trails. • The smallest drilling rig capable of accessing each site has been selected to perform the borings. • No structure will be instaIled as part of this project. • A track mounted geotechnical driIl will be used to minimize soil disturbance in boring locations that exhibit soft soil conditions. • Best Management Practices (BMPs) for sediment control will be instaIled as appropriate prior to the boring occurring and will be removed afterward, all drilling slurry and soil cuttings will be stored in lockable drums and disposed of off-site, and the drilling crew will have at least one emergency spill response kit on site at all times. • Borings have been placed as far away as possible from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of Springbrook Creek. WSDOT has determined that the proposed borings are also exempt from SEPA under WAC 468- 12-800(3), which exempts "Information collection and research, as provided by WAC 197-11- 800(18), including but not limited to the development, adoption, and revision of transportation plans and six-year construction programs, and any other studies, plans, and programs which lead to proposals which have not yet been approved, adopted, or funded, and which do not commit the transportation department to proceed with the proposals contained therein." Please accept this letter as an official request from WSDOT for an exemption from the standard Critical Areas requirements and a Shorelines Substantial Development Permit for these geotechnical borings. Thank you in advance for taking the time to process our request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Terry Drochak at (425) 456-8595 or e-mail 1erry.c\rocha k@i405.wsdot.wa.gov. Sincerely, Allison Ray 1-405 Project Environmental Manager (425) 456-8610 rayalli@wsdot.wa.gov Attachments: Attachment 1 -Description of Project Activity Attachment 2 -Vicinity Map and Site Plan Drawing Set Pnge4of6 1 • Page 5 of6 Attachment 1: Description of Project Activity A total of twelve geotechnical borings (3 of those are not in shorelines or critical areas) are proposed and will be performed using either a truck drill or a track drill. It is anticipated that five borings will be drilled using a truck drill and seven borings will be drilled using a track drill. A truck drill is essentially a geotechnical drill mounted on a truck. Typically, a truck drill is used when access to the boring location is easy. For this project it is anticipated that borings SBD-l, SBD-2, SBD-3, SBE-l and SBE-2 will be drilled using a truck drill. A track drill is essentially a geotechnical drill mounted on a chassis that contains tracks instead of tires. Typically, a track drill is used when the boring location is located in steep terrain or on soft ground. Utilizing this kind of geotechnical drill minimizes or eliminates rutting in soft soils. For this project it is anticipated that borings SBC-l, SBC-2, SBC-3, SBC-4, SBC-5, SBE-3 and SBE-4 will be drilled using a track drill. Drilling operations will be conducted using a casing advancer system. The casing advancer system is the drilling system used on most WSDOT projects. The drilling operation begins with rotating a 4-inch steel casing into the ground. Then a 3-inch casing is used inside the 4-inch casing to drill the hole. The 4-inch casing is used to re-circulate the drilling slurry in a tub that is placed near the boring hole. Where needed, a silt fence is constructed around the drill location to contain any loss of drilling slurry (drilling slurry is essentially soil mixed with water). TI1ree small groundwater level measuring devices, called a peizometers, wi11 be temporarily installed inside the boring holes of SBC-l, SBC-4 and SBC-5 to collect shallow groundwater level information to assist in the design and development of the Mitigation Banking Instrument, design and construction plans. The peizometer would be removed prior to onsite grading required during the future construction of the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank. When the boring is completed, the boring hole is backfilled with bentonite per Washington State Department of Ecology requirements. The drilling slurry and soil cuttings are transferred into sealed drums and disposed of off-site. Upon completion of the geotechnical borings, the drill rigs will be removed from the site in the same manner as they were placed. After removing the drill from the boring location, the area will be restored to original condition and, if necessary, native grass seed and straw will be spread over any disturbed areas. All work to be performed is located within sites C, D, and E as indicated on the attached drawing set. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) Actions taken to avoid and minimize potential impacts during geotechnical test borings include the following BMPs: • The time duration of the activity is limited. The twelve total geotechnical borings will be completed in twelve work days. Page 6 of6 • The number of geotechnical borings within critical areas and shorelines has been minimized to the greatest extent feasible (only 12 total borings, 3 of those are not in shorelines or critical areas). • Impacts to site vegetation will be minimized. No trees are anticipated to be removed as a result of the geotechnical boring activities unless unforeseen site conditions arise during onsite operations. • The boring locations are in areas that are easily accessible by the work vehicles. Most of the borings are accessible using existing roads or trails. • The smallest drilling rig capable of accessing each site has been selected to perform the borings. • No structure will be installed as part of this project. • A track mounted geotechnical drill will be used to minimize soil disturbance in boring locations that exhibit soft soil conditions. • Best Management Practices (BMPs) for sediment control will be installed as appropriate prior to the boring occurring and will be removed afterward, all drilling slurry and soil cuttings will be stored in lockable drums and disposed of off-site, and the dri11ing crew will have at least one emergency spill response kit on site at all times. • Borings have been placed as far away as possible from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of Springbrook Creek. • Drilling slurry will be re-circulated within a closed dri11ing system and not discharged at the site. • The volume of water for dri11ing will be minimized. • At no time will drilling slurry or soil cuttings be allowed to enter Waters of the State of Washington. • Sediment control BMPs, such as silt fences, will be installed as appropriate. • Removal of sediment control BMPs will be performed immediately after drilling has been completed. • Immediately upon completion, boring holes will be filled with bentonite clay to prevent mixing of aquifers and eliminating the route for surface contaminants. " AND o 500 ScALE IN FEET GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES NECESSARY FOR, PREPARAT I ON OF PERilIT APPL I CATION BORING SUMMARY OArr VICINITY MAP " 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SITE TITLE. INDEX & VICINITY MAP T1 SIImT ~ SHEETS LEGAL DESCRH ONS BOUNDARY A: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 577122 THE LAND REfERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE Of WASHINGTON. AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. LOTS I. 2. 1 AND 8. BLOCK 6. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INOUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCOROING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RECORDED IN VOlUME III Of PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE fORMER 20 FOOT RAILROA~ RIGHT-Of-WAY. AS OELINEATED ON SAID PLAT AOJOINING SAID LOTS. AS RELINQUISHEO UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8909110681. BOUNDARY B & C: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER NOo 577123 THE LAND REFERREO TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE Of WASHINGTON. AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. ~. AlL THOSE PORTIONS OF GOVERNMENT LOT 11. OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER Of THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. DESCRIBEO AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT A POINT Of THE EAST LINE Of GOVERNMENT lOT 10 IN SAID SECTION AT A POINT 255.38 FEET SOUTHERLY. AS MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE. FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF HENRY MEAOER DONATION LAND ClAIM NO. 46, THENCE WESTERLY ON A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE EASTERlY LINE OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY AT A POINT 289.12 FEET SOUTHERLY. AS MEASURED ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE. fROM SAID SOUTH LINE Of THE DONATION LANO CLAIM AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TD A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 60 fEET EAST Of SAID EASTERLY LINE Of THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY AT A POINT 1.100 fEET NORTH OF THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE Of SAIO SECTION, THENCE SOUTH. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE. TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE Of A TRACT 'CONVEYED TO BROADACRES. INC. BY OEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1504010313. SAIO POINT BEING 545.6 FEET NORTH Of SAID EAST-WEST CENTERLINE, THENCE EAST. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE Of THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SAIO SECTION AT A POINT 545.6 FEET NORTH Of SAID EAST-WEST CENTERLINE, THENCE SOUTH. ALONG SAID EAST LINE. TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LONGACRES PARKWAY AS DELINEATED QN THE FACE Of BURLINGTON NORTHERN INOUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. PACES 42 THROUGH 44o INClUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THENCE SOUTH 81° 51'39" WEST 1.624.00 fEET. MORE OR LESS. TO THE INTERSECTION Of THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION Of THE EASTERlY LINE OF THE PROPOSED P-I CHANNEL AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAT. SAIO LINE BEING 20.00 FEET. MORE OR LESS. WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5. BLOOt 9 Of SAID PUT, THENCE SOUTHERLY. ALONG SAID EXTENSION. TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88· 29' 29" EAST FROM A POINT BEING MEASURED AlONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY AND 2.028.44 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE Of SAID SECTION: EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED BY CENTRAL PUCET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY BY KING COUNTY CAUSE NO. 02-2-217S1-5 AND AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUNSER 20020906001216. TOGETHER WITH ALL THOSE PORTIONS Of GOVERNMENT LOT 9 AND OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER Of SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT A POINT 20 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 9 AND 1.254.20 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE. THENCE NORTH 88° 24'48" WEST 1.029.43 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT 300 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 9, THENCE SOUTH 1° 01' 49" WEST ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 300 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT '9 ANO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SECTION 25. 845.23 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 88· 24'48" EAST 1.032.55 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT 20 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAIO SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER. . THENCE NORTH O· 49'1~' EAST 845.19 FEET TO PLACE OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED FOR SOUTHWEST 21TH STREET BY DEED RECORDED UNOER RECOROING NUMBER 8203150516, TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE EAST 20 FEET THEREOF. AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE PLAT OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECOROED IN VOLUME III OF PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44; INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE. BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAIO SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER WHICH IS 300 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER, THENCE SOUTH 01° 01' 49" WEST. ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 300 FEET EAST Of THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER. TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1. BLOCK 1o BURLINGTON NORTHERN INOUSTRIAL PARI RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME III Of PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN lING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE. AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE FOlLOWING. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 9, THENCE NORTH 81· 21' 38" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOf A DISTANCE OF 20.01 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 20 FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 9, THENCE SOUTH O· 49' 41" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE Of 1.254.20 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE Of A TRACT Of LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 1603250650. THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT OF LAND NORTH 88· 24' \1" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.022.32 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 300 FEET EASTERLY OF THE WEST LINE Of SAID GOVERNKENT LOT 9 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 1° 01' 49" EAST A DISTANCE Of 4S.OO FEET, THENCE NORTH B8· 24'17" WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.01 fEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNKENT LOT 9, THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, SOUTH I· 01' 49" WEST A OISTANCE Of 90.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 88· 24'11" EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.01 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 300 FEET EASTERLY Of THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, THENCE ALONG SAIO PARALLEL LINE NORTH 01° 01'49-EAST A DISTANCE Of 45 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING. SllLII. ALL THAT PORTION OF SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF THE PLAT OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON 11 o ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME III OF PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. ' BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 9 OF SAID PLAT OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN IN~USTRIAL PARK RENTON NO. III THENCE NORTH 88° 32'51" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PLAT. A DISTANCE OF 20.00 fEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF PROPOSED P-I CHANNEL, THENCE NORTH 02° 01' II" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID CHANNEL PROJECTED NORTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 1.560.00 FEET. MORE OR LESS. TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 81° 51' 39" WEST FROM THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER Of LONGACRES PARKWAY. AS DEDICATED IN THE PLAT OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE Of GOVERNMENT LOT 9 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER Of SAID SECTION 25, THENCE SOUTH 81° 51'39" EAST. A OISTANCE OF 1.624.00 FEET. MORE OR LESS. TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID RIGHT-Of-WAY. SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 9, THENCE SOUTH 01· 30'31" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE Of SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY. A DISTANCE OF 1.510.12 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF BLOCK 9 Of SAID PLAT PROJECTED EASTERLY. SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, THENCE NORTH 81° 44'21" WEST ALDi;G SAIO NORTH LINE. A DISTANCE OF 1.341.99 FEET, THENCE NORTH 8° 32'51" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 9. A DISTANCE OF 215.19 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD HOLDINGS. INC •• BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8911170955. ~ LOT 1. BLOCK 1. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECOROED IN VOLUME III OF PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVEo IN liNG COUNTY. WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION Of SAID LOT 7 CONVEYED TO THE CITY Of RENTON FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY OEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8306090101 AND AS CORRECTED BY RECORDING NUNSER 8308050868,TOCETHER WITH THE WEST HALf Of THE fORMER 20 FOOT RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJOINING ON THE EAST. AS RELINQUISHEO UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8909110681. ~ THAT PORTION Of LOTS I AND 6o BLOCK 1. PLAT OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME III OF PLATSo PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYING NORTH Of THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE;BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT I WHICH LIES NORTH 01° 47' 34" EAST 112.52 fEET fROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOf, THENCE NORTH 88· 29' 29" WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LIN[ Of SAID LOT I. A DISTANCE OF 1.204.25 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF OAKESOALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AND THE TERMINUS OF SAIO DESCRIBEO LINE,TOGETHER WITH THAT HALF OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJOINING SAID DESCRIBED PORTION OF LOTS I AND 6. AS OUIT-CLAIMED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8909110681. EXCEPT THAT PORTION Of SAID LOT 6. BLOCK 1. CONVEYED TO THE CITY Of RENTON fOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEEO RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8306090101 AND AS CORRECTED BY RECORDING NUMBER 83080S0568;IALSO KNOWN AS LOT I. CITY Of RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. SHPL-125-89 RECOROED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9103209006). BOUNDARY 0: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO o 577124 EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOf, AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. I BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of SAID NORTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, THENCE NORTH 30 fEET, THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE Of SAID SUBDIVISION. TO 'A PONT 20.95 FEET EASTERLY Of EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RAILROAD. AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID OLD MAIN LINE TRACT CENTERLINE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH PARAlLEL WITH SAID OLD MAIN LINE TRACT CENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF 213.40 FEET. THENCE WESTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID OLD MAIN LIKE TRACT CENTERLINE. A DISTANCE Of 20.95 fEET TO A POINT DISTANT SO fEET EASTERLY. AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID OLD MAIN LINE TRACT CENTERLINE. THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE 50 FEET EASTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID OLD MAIN LINE TRACT CENTERLINE. TO A POINT 30 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE Of SAID SUBDIVISION. THENCE EAST TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING. BOUNDARY E: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OROER NO. 577125 THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE Of WASHINGTON. AND OESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. LOTS I. 2 AND 4. BLOCK 8. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 111 OF fLATS. P~GES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN lING COUNTY. WAS!fINGTON. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AS DELINEATED ON SAID PLAT ADJOINING SAID LOTS. AS RELINOUISHED UNOER RECORDING NUMBER 89091106Bl, EXCEPT THE NORTH 463.95 FEET Of SAID LOT 4 AS MEASUREO ALONG THE WES,T LINE THEREOf, ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 463.95 FEET Of SAID FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF. AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION Of SAID LOT 2 DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE CITY Of RENTON RECORDED UNOER RECORDING NUMBER 8306090101 AND CORRECTION THEREOF RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8308050568. (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT I. CITY Of RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-92-090. RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 92(6119003) • THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE Of WASHINGTON. AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHWEST OUARTER Of SECTION 36. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYING EASTERLY Of THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY AND LYING WEST OF THE fOlLOWING DESCRIBED LINE. 8EGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of HENRY ADAMS DONATION LAND CLAIM, THENCE EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 180TH STREET (fORMERLY CORD). 114 FEET, THENCE NORTH 30 fEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF AFORESAID STREET AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 644.78 FEET, THENCE NORTHERLY ON A STRAIGHT LINE. PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY. TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 AND THE TERMINUS Of SAID LINE. !Un P.t. 1t.E.. ST ... 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SITE T02 SH[£T 0>' 511££15 .., ~ ---t.J t.J X II) t.J t.J II) t.J Z --'-...J x u ~ < ~F: MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET 2 QA1£ P.'. sr __ LEGEND r~-~ --- ~ NOTEI WETlAND BORING WETlAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATECDRIZATION/RATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION • o SO 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY NIT I GA TI ON SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE A satEr r6 SliHTS .... ... L&J L&J :z: '" L&J L&J '" L&J Z ...J :z: u ... < ~ DArt P.I. 5'_ 8C>< ~.I. 5T_ o LEGEND r=-~ --- ~ NOTEI WETLAND BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNOARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATECORIZATION/RATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER VIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPL ICATION • 50 100 SCAlE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY M SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE A 2 511t£T OF 5>l£ETS a: III ~~~~!(l~~gjn1li ~ Il ~ ~ n PI""''''PlZ~C~;::1 rrI ~ ~o"'Pln ... ZIII ~I~I U'I tn PI", Yi'5?55' ::z::: lie :aPl8-iPlo",~ "V ~" -4 _0 ;: ... :u:o:! ~!:;:;o :a _r-z iloa:-nloz-<c .... n-N "'", -eCXJ L...I z -frrl < .., lO~O~znllldPlg C'l ]> ", IX! -< ", ~-"'Olo:a ... Z :u r-... -" IIIOOZ%I %0 8 ~]> r-Q !:~ z:aI(lPl!(lPl~ ]>r--0 n-<~~~:ao:a%l-m 1li ;>C -4r-rrI I :.--c:a.-t<"'-""'" 0 -< A =~m=o~~~glll :u ... n -rrI -,.. :u 0-< 0 o Plzzn~aI"'o Z ~ rr1 :I: C'l rr1 Z c.n :r:~..,C'l:a-<Io~~Z 0 ;>C -Plg~~~j;l~~~ tn:l:~ U'I --:I: ~~r:::I~!:o -<j;l -f~U: !i! ~PI%lalfflllllll -I -00-< % rr1 rrI:I:]> PlZO z PlOlo IX! :t -< : ... =alfi~~~" ]> ~~~ ~PI !:aI -< -4 o1li. n ... zlo 0 ~ ... -%PlZ ,.. ... ", 0 ? ~ -<III PI n 10 0 0 Z .., 0 ~ iii m lJ.I ;;I <D t-LLI LLI :%: II'l .NO. DArt v t-LLI LLI :%: II'l LLI LLI II'l LLI Z -' :%: U t-~ 2: LEGEND I::--~ --- ~ NOTE, WETLAND BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SI TES A. B AND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY fOR SPRINGBRDOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY Of RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATIONIRATING AND REOUIRED BUfFER WIDTHS MAY BE fOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. '. o 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MIT I GA TI ON SITE SPR[NGBRooK CREEK S[TE B 4 SlltET r6 511t£T5 D'IT ,,--P.E.51_ '" ~ w W :%: In W W In W Z ... :%: U ~ '"' ::i o LEGEND r::--~ --- ~ NOTEI WETLAND BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY or RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND ·CATEGORIZATIONIRATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. " " 50 100 SCALE I N FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY tA SPRINCBRooK CREEK SITE C 5 SHU:T ~ SHEETS ItI ~ w w ::E: ." W W ." W Z -' ::E: U ~ "'" :::E MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET a naTr ""U.,nn<:. 00..1 I FED.AID PROJ. 1'1~ 'UI~~lq~ ~ DArE q' ~ w W ::E: ." W W ." W Z -' ::E: U ~ "'" :::E LEGEND r::--~ --- ~ NOTE. V£TLAND BORINC V£TLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINCBRooK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATEO BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO VETLAND CATEGORIZATION/RATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER VIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE V£TLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. o 50 100 SCAlE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE C 6 SlltET OF 5I<£ETS [)ATE p.r. 5'_ CD ~ w w z VI w w VI w Z ....I Z U l-e :::&: o LEGEND r:;;:--~ --- ~ NOTE. VEnANO BORING VETlANO BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONST)TUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDl"RY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESICNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO VETLAND CATECORIZATIONIRATING AND REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYINC THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPliCATION. 50 100 SCAlE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY M I TI GA TI ON 5 I TE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE C 7 SllEE' ~ SHUn .... ~ L&.I L&.I :J: \11 L&.I L&.I \11 L&.I Z ~ :J: U ~ < :s OAT[ LEGEND r=-~ --- ~ NOTEI W£TlAHD BORING W£TLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNUARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO W£TLAND CATEGORIZATION/RATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION • o 50 100 SCAlE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MIT I GA 11 ON 5 I TE SPRINCBRooK CREEK SITE C 8 SUET 0; SHUTS OUt IIItI P.I. ST_ .... lo.I lo.I :l: en lo.I lo.I en lo.I Z ...J :l: U .... <t ~ LEGEND ':;:--4 ---WETLAND ~ BORING NOTE, WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNOARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE OESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATIONIRATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION • ...-.......---~ o 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE 0 9 SlltET .. SH£ETS en lLI Z :%: U ..... ~ :::E: .Arr LEGEND I:;:--~ --- ~ NOTEI WETlAND BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATDRY5HORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATION/RATING AND REOulRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. ~-~ o 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE 0 10 SlllET rtF SIt££TS MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET 12 OA1£ PoL.ST_1IItlI {#~. ;~: .. .: .. :.' ' .. ,.:: p.I.st_ '!> . <"'".~ ~{.':,.;; :". '. /?/<, ··r· ." ... ~ :5. i . ~~<~~ --. .;.' LEGEND r;:--4 --- ~ NOTEI WETLAND BORING WETLAND BOUNOARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATION/RATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS WAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. o 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SPRINCBROOK CREEK SITE E 11 SH£ET OF SllUTS MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET 11 P.! DAn IIItI o LEGEND r::--4 --- ~ NOTEI WETLAND BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATIONFRATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY M I TI CA T I ON SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE E 12 511££T OF 511[£T5 \. :. ~-- REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Regulatory Branch Ms. Sharon Wright DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 3766 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124·3766 APR 2 1 2005 Washington State Dept. of Transportation 600 -lOSth Avenue Northeast, Suite 405 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Dear Ms. Wright: Reference: 200500415 Washington State Dept. of Transportation On March 17,2005, we inspected the property at the Springbrook Creek Mitigation Bank site in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, in response to your request for verification of the boundaries of the wetlands in the project area. The U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers has detennined that the delineation depicted in the report "Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report" dated January 2005, accurately identifies jurisdictional wetlands in the project area. This approved jurisdictional detennination is valid for a period of 5 years from the date of this letter unless new infonnation wan'ants revision of the detennination. You have the right to appeal this deternlination pursuant to the requirements of the enclosed Administrative Appeal Rule package. IfappeaJed, the completed Notification of Administrative Appeal Options and Process and Request for Appeal form should be sent to Division Engineer, ATTN: Mores Bergman, Appeal Review Officer, U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers, Northwestern 'Division, 12565 West Center Road, Omaha, Nebraska, 68144-3869. If you propose to do any work in the areas identified to be waters of the U.S.,· you should contact our office prior to commencing work to determine pernlit requirements. :please note that conducting certain activities in waters of the U.S. without Department of the Anny authorization would violate Federal law. If you have any questions, please contact Kate Stenberg at (206)764-6912 or via email atKathryn . .T.Stenberg@usace.atmy.mil. Sincerely, 1lJUj~/d; Michelle Walker, Chief South Application Review Section " .. PRELlMINAR Y JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the pennit. II ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit,document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter ofPemlission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)' modify the permit to address all of your concems, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and retum it to the district engineer for final authorization, If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the' proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined pemlit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the ~~~~~ , '. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial ofa permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved m. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date ofthis notice, means that you accept the approved m in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved m. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved m, you may appeal the approved m under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary .rD. The Preliminary JD is not ~ppealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the .rD. : (Describe your reasons for appealing decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this fonn to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental infonnation that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new infonnation or analyses to the record. However, nrr,vulp additional information to the location of information that record. If you have questions rpuRrrlin process you may contact: Kathryn Stenberg, Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Post Office Box 3755 Seattle, Washington 98124-3755 Telephone: (206) 764·6912 Mores Bergman, Appeal Review Officer U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division 12565 West Center Road Omaha, Nebraska 68144-3869 Telephone: (402) 697-2533 OF ENTRY: Your signatllre below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a IS-day notice of site tion and will have the in all site . Si NAO·RFA FORM F.doc 10 April 2000 Date:· Telephone number: Process for Unacceptable Request for Appeal No Division Engineer determines RFA Is unacceptable. (From Appendix A) Review officer returns RFA for applicant to complete. Appendix 0 Yes Division Engineer returns RFA to applicant to revise. Yes Appeal process begins on date of receipt of acceptable Yes RFA. (See Appendix A for process.) Administrative Appeal Process for Approved 'Jurlsdlctlonal Determinations Approved JD valid for 5 years. Yes District makes new approved JD. To continue with appeal process, appellant must revise RFA. See Appendix D. Yes DiviSion engineer or deSignee remands decision to district, with specific Instructions, for No reconslderatlon;·appeal Yes process completed. Appendix C District Issues approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) to applicanUlandowner with NAO. Applicant decides to appeal approved JD. Applicant submits RFA to division engineer within 60 days of date of NAO. . j, Corps reviews RFA and notifies appallant within 30 days of receipt. Optional JD Appeals Meeting and/or site Investigation . RO reviews record and the division engineer (or designee) renders a decision on the merits of the appeal within 90 days of receipt of an acceptable RFA. District's decision Is upheld; appeal process completed. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 • WOlhlnglon 81alo VII Doperlmonl 01 T,onaportoUon I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................•.....•.....•..•.......................................•..•............ 1 What is the 1-405 Corridor Program? ............................................................................... 1 What is EEl? .................................................................................................................... J How does this report support EEl? .................................................................................. 1 Where is the EEl Mitigation Site located? ....................................................................... 1 How was the wetland study for EEl conducted? ............................................................. .2 RESULTS ..................................•...............................................•................•..........•..•.....•... 5 UNIT A .....................•...........•...•...............................................................•.............•..•.•...•... 5 UNIT B ......................•......................................................................................................... 8 UNIT C ..........................•...........................................................•...............................•....... 12 UNIT D ..................................................................•..............•..............................•............. 15 UNITE ............................•.....•.....................•...........................•.•.........................•............. 17 REFERENCES .......................................................•......................................................... 18 APPENDIX A -WETLAND DELINEATION METHODS ..................................... A-I APPENDIX B -WETLAND .DATA SHEETS ........................................................•..• B-1 AP.PENDIX C -WETI..JAND PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................ C-l APPENDIX D -WETLAND SURVEY MAPS .......................................................... D-1 List of Tables TABLE 1. CRITERIA FOR WETLAND RATING CATEGORIES ......................... .4 TABLE 2. WETLAND SIZE, RATING, AND CLASSIFICATION FOR WETLANDS IN THE SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND MITIGATION BANK ......•...............•...•...•...•.............•.........•.......................•.........•...................•....•....•....... 5 TABLE A-I. DEFINITIONS OF WETLAND PLANT INDICATOR CATEGORIES USED TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OF HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION ........•.•.•...•....................•..•..............•........•.•................................•......... A-I Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 • W •• hlngton alate "II Dopartmant of T,anapootatlon I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Corridor Program Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects FIGURE I LOCATION OF MITIGATION SITES ....................................................... 3 FIGURE 2 UNIT A WETLAND DELINEATION ......................................................... 7 FIGURE 3 UNIT B WETLAND DEl.INEATION ......................................................... 9 FIGURE 4 UNIT C WETLAND DELINEATION ....................................................... 13 FIGURE 5 UNIT D WETLAND DEl.INEATION ....................................................... 16 Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ... ;;& W .... hlnolon IIloto .", Departmanl ot Transportation II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Introduction Wllat is tile 1-405 Corridor Program? The 1-405 Corridor, from 1-5 in Tukwila to 1-5 in Lynnwood, needs improvement to relieve current and future traffic congestion. The 1-405 Corridor Program is a set of improvements to the 1-405 Corridor designed to address congestion on this important arterial. The proposed improvements will result in some environmental impacts, some of which will be addressed through a mitigation program called Early Environmental Investment (EEl). Wllat is EEl? Early Environmental Investment develops mitigation in advance of project impacts. The EEl process wiIl identify, rank, select, design, and permit environmental investment for improving aquatic resources, fish habitat, wetlands, water quantity, and floodplains. This advance selection and creation of mitigation wiIl allow the resources longer to mature before actual project impacts are incurred, reducing the length of time that resource functions are affected. EEl is a cooperative effort, requiring information sharing and partnering among agencies with an interest in the 1-405 study area. How does tills report support EEl? This report is an investigation of one mitigation site selected under the EEl process. The report provides detailed baseline wetland information on the proposed Springbrook mitigation site. A separate mitigation report will be prepared to discuss details of the proposed mitigation activities at this site. Wllere is tile EEl Mitigation Site located? The Proposed Springbrook Mitigation Site consists of five units (A through E, See Figure 1). 'All five units are within the City of Renton, Washington: Unit A is located southwest of the intersection of SW 27th Street and Lind Avenue SW. It extends approximately 1,200 feet south from the intersection, and approximately 900 feet west to Springbrook Creek. Unit A is in Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East (WiIlamette Meridian). Unit B is located southeast of the intersection of SW 27th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW (Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends approximately 1,200 feet south from the intersection, and approximately 1,200 feet east to Springbrook Creek. Unit C is located west of Oakesdale Avenue SW, between SW 27th Street and SW 34th Street (Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends west from Oakesdale Avenue SW to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right-of-way. Unit D is located north of SW 43 rd Street, immediately east of the BNSF right-of-way (Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East). It extends approximately i,300 feet north ofSW 43rd Street, and approximately 350 feet east of the BNSF right-of-way. Unit E is a triangular parcel located east of Oakesdale Avenue SW, approximately 400 feet south ofSW 34th Avenue (Section 25, Township 23North, Range 4 East). Springbrook Creek forms the southeast boundary of Unit E. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ... =z: Wulllnoton .Ia .. .", Departmon' of TranapMtetlon 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I How was the wetland study for EEl conducted? The investigation included two steps. The first step was a review of existing documents such as soil surveys, aerial photographs, and other available documents. The second step was the field investigation, delineation, and classification of the wetlands observed on the units. Step 1: Review of Existing Infonnation Existing documents that were reviewed for this study included but were not limited to: • Soil Survey of King County Area. Washington (Snyder et a1. 1973) • Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Prospectus (Washington State Department of Transportation 2004) • National Wetland Inventory Web site (http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html) (USFWS 2004) These documents provide background information on the soils, hydrology, topography, land use, wetlands, streams, and wildlife habitat in the site vicinity. Step 2: Field Investigation Wetland delineations were made using the methods described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington State Department of Ecology [Ecology] 1997) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987). Areas were identified as wetlands if they displayed the necessary soils, plants, and hydrologic conditions. A detailed description of the field methods used in this study is provided in Appendix A of this report, and the wetland delineation data sheets are presented in Appendix B. Delineated wetlands were classified according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et a1. 1979). The City of Renton wetland rating system (Renton Municipal Code Title 4, Chapter 3, Section 4.3.050) was used to rate wetlands. Table 1 summarizes the wetland rating criteria utilized. A detailed analysis of wetland functions is not included in this report, but has been provided to regulatory agencies under separate cover (Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Information Packet, [WSDOT 2004]). Updated information will be included in the wetland mitigation report to be prepared in 2005. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 2 I I I I I I Legend I I I I 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 FeBl ----'---- I I I I I I I I FIGURE 1 Location of Mitigation Sites I Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delinealion Report ! February 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Category Category I Category II Category III Table 1. Criteria for Wetland 'Rating Categories City of Renton8 Category 1 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) The presence of species listed by federal or state government as endangered or threatened, or the presence of essential habitat for those species; and/or (b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (In dispersed patches or otherwise) with two (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or (c) Wetlands equal to or greater than ten (10) acres In size and having three (3) or more vegetation classes, one of which Is open water; and/or (d) The presence of plant associations of Infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; and/or (e) Wetlands assigned the Unique/Outstanding #1 rating In the current King County Wetlands Inventory 1991 or as thereafter amended. Category 2 wetlands are wetlands greater than two thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands greater than two thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet that are not Category 1 or 3 wetlands; and/or (b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (c) Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, but are not Category 1 wetlands; and/or (d) Wetlands assigned the Significant #2 rating In the current King County Wetlands Inventory 1991 or as thereafter amended; and/or (e) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human-related physical alteration such as diking, ditching, or channelization. Category 3 wetlands are wetlands greater than five thousand (5,000) square feet which meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) Wetlands that are severely disturbed. Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the following criteria: • Are characterized by hydrologic Isolation, human-related hydrologic alterations such as diking, ditching, channelization and/or outlet modification; and • Have solis alterations such as the presence of fill, soli removal, and/or compaction of solis; and • MaY,have altered vegetation. (b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are: • Wetlands occurring on top of fill materials; and • Characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness, and used minimally by wildlife. These wetlands are generally found In the areas such as the Green River Valley and Black River Drainage Basin. (c) All other wetlands not classified as Category 1 or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands. 8 City of Renton (Renton Municipal Code Title 4, Chapter 3, 43.050), Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .... ;;z= W .... ln&lon lIa.o ."" Deputmonl" Tronaportatlon 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Results The initial wetland delineation was performed in October and November 2004. Eight wetlands were located in four (Units A, B, C, and D) of the five units. No wetlands were identified in Unit E. Wetland delineation data sheets are provided in Appendix B, and site photographs are in Appendix C. Table 2 summarizes the size, rating and classification of wetlands found within the study area, and Figures 2 through 5 show the wetland boundaries and data plot locations. Note that the second column of Table 2 shows the area of the delineated portion of the wetland (i.e., the portion on the parcel), followed by the estimated overall wetland size in parenthesis. Table 2. Wetland Size, Rating, and Classification for Wetlands In the Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Site Wetland Unit A A-1 Unit B 8-1 8-2 8-3 Unit Cd C-1 C-2 C-3 UnltD 0-1 Delineated area In acres (overall wetland sizeD) 22.9 (24) 22.3 (22.3) 10.0 (10.0) 0.3 (0.3) 21.2 (33.9) 5.8 (48.5) 0.9 (48.5) 5.6 (6.7) Wetland Ratln~ City of Renton 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 USFWS ClasslflcatlonC Forested, Scrub/shrub, Emergent Forested, Emergent Forested, Emergent Forested, Emergent Forested, Scrub/shrub Forested, Emergent Forested Forested, Scrub/shrub, Emergent • Overall wetlands size Is estimated based on aerial photograph Interpretation. Area of delineated portions of the wetlands Is based on Instrument survey (Huitt Zollara, 2004.2006). b Wetland retlngs ere based on Renton Municipal Code. Title 4 Chapter 3. All ratings shown In this table ere preliminary and have not been reviewed by the City of Renton or other regulatory agencies. C Cowardln et al. (1979). All wetlands are palustrine. d Wetlands C-1. C-2. and C-3 are part of the same wetland complex. Offslte wetlands to the north were calculated with Wetland C-1. and those to the south of the property were calculeted with C-21C-3. Unit A Field investigations were performed by project biologists at Unit A on October 20, 2004, and additional data were collected on October 21 and 28, 2004. One wetland (A-I) was delineated within the unit. A summary of the findings at Unit A are presented below. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ..... ;;S W.""lnolon illite ... " Departmenl of TrenopMtellon 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland A-I Palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent Category 3 22.9 acres In Unit Al24 acres overall Wetland A-I is riverine wetland located in a low lying area between adjacent roads, developed areas elevated by fill material, and the maintained berm along Springbrook Creek. Wetland A-I is approximately 24 acres in size, and includes palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested areas comprise a fringe along the northern, southern, and western edges of Wetland A-I, although portions of the forested component extend into the middle of the unit. The scrub/shrub communities occur as smaller (approximately 0.2 to 1.5 acre) areas scattered throughout the forested and emergent communities. The emergent community covers the eastern Y2 of Unit A. Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder (Alnus rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) in the canopy. These trees are relatively low (generally less than 75 feet tall), with diameters at breast height (dbh) up to approximately 24 inches. The understory includes Pacific willow (Salix lucida var. lasiandra) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) is the dominant herbaceous species and occupies the emergent areas. Soils in Wetland A-I are mapped as Snohomish silt loam, Woodinville silt loam, and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in wetland test pits were genemlly very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) silty clay or silty clay loam. Fine .redoxymorphic features were common in most areas. Wetland A-I is separated from Springbrook Creek by a maintained berm located approximately 20 feet above the water level. Two small ditches, referred to herein as the northern and southern ditches, tmverse Wetland A-I from east to west. The northern ditch crosses the middle of the unit beginning near Lind A venue SW and extending to the eastern foot of the berm along Springbrook Creek. A culvert carries it under the berm. This ditch is approximately 6 feet wide and 10 inches deep, and reed canarygrass lines the channel and dominates the substrate. The southern ditch is located just north of the south property boundary. The ditch begins at a culvert under Lind Avenue SW, and flows west to Springbrook Creek, where it passes through the berm. The southern ditch is approximately 10 to 15 feet wide, and appears to consist ofa series of loosely connected areas of shallow inundation. The banks are vegetated with alder, cottonwood, and willows, which provide shade and contribute to organic material. A culvert carries water from the south directly into Wetland A-l. Wetland hydrology in Wetland A-I appears to derive from elevated groundwater from Springbrook Creek and stormwater flows entering the wetland from culverts to the east and south. Areas of saturated soils and shallow inundation were observed during the field investigations. Fill berms adjacent to the sidewalks along Lind Avenue SW and SW 27th Street extend down to the wetland edge. These areas are dominated by dense thickets of Himalayan blackberry and likely consist of fill material placed when these roads were constructed. With the exception ofa few undeveloped areas, the majority of the parcels surrounding Wetland A~I are developed (see Figures 1 and 2). An undeveloped lot, potentially consisting of a wetland, is located north Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 2 Unit A Wetland Delineation o Interpreted (off-site) Wetland Data Plot W+E a 100 20Reel s I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I of SW 27th Street and east of Springbrook Creek. Due to the presence of the street, this area is not directly connected to Wetland A-I, although it likely was in the past. The parcel south of Wetland A-I along Lind A venue SW includes a large building and parking areas. A small storm water treatment feature, approximately 50 feet wide, is associated with this development and is located between the parking areas and Wetland A-t. Until recently, the parcel to the southwest of Unit A contained maintained pasture grass. This pasture is currently being graded for development. The western boundary of Unit A includes the channelized portion of Springbrook Creek. A large wetland complex is located immediately west of Springbrook Creek (see Unit B description). In summary, Wetland A-I is a large system comprised of multiple vegetation types that contribute to relatively high function. However, its buffers are narrow and disturbed, limited in size and function by surrounding land uses. Although Wetland A-I is surrounded on three sides by development, a berm adjacent to Springbrook Creek forms the fourth side and is relatively undisturbed. Springbrook Creek provides a hydrologic connection to other habitats upstream and downstream of the site, as well as areas along the BNSF right-of-way and the Green River. UnitB Project biologists delineated three wetlands (B-1, B-2, and B-3) in Unit B on October 19, 2004. Additional data were collected on October 20,2004. A summary of the wetland investigations is provided below. Wetland B-1 Palustrine forested and emergent Category 3 22.3 acres in Unit B/22.3 acres overall Wetland B-1 is a depressional wetland approximately 22.3 acres in size and includes palustrine forested and emergent communities (Cowardin et a1. 1979). The forested areas comprise a fringe along SW 27th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW, and also occupy the southern third of the wetland (See Figures 1 and 3). The emergent community occupies the northeastern third of the wetland. Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder and black cottonwood in the canopy, with an understory of Pacific willow, Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), Himalayan blackberry, and red osier dogwood (Cornus sericea). Herbaceous species in the forested areas include bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara), scouring rush (Equisetum hymale), English ivy (Hedera helix), and hedge bindweed (Convulvulus sepium). Trees in Wetland B-1 are relatively short (the tallest are approximately 75 feet), with diameters at breast height (dbh) up to approximately 24 inches. Emergent portions of Wetland B-1 are dominated by reed canarygrass, although yellowflag iris, common cattail (Typha lati/olia), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), waterpepper (Polygollum hydropiper), and mild waterpepper (Polygonum hydropiperoides var. hydropiperoides) are locally dominant. Soils in Wetland B-1 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et a1. 1973). The observed soils were generally dark to very dark grayish brown (lOYR 412 to IOYR 3/2) silty loam to silty clay loam. Fine redoxymorphic features were common in most of the sample plots. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ..-.. =s W .... lngton ltat • • " Departmont of 'r.~lon 8 I I I I I I I I I $ I :1 ~ .0 01 C C "-JfJ 01 I "5 01 s 9 Q) 0> ~ u I 3 0 m ~I 0 I ~ .0 CIl C 'C ~ ill 'Y I ~ 0 .., d '" ~ Q) 'f?' I .!* ':2 I I I I Figure 3 Unit B Wetland Delineation o Parcel ~ Surveyed Wetland Data Plot 150 300 ~!!!!!!!!!~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii. Feet N W+E S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland B-1 is located in a depression bordered by SW 2ih Street to the north, Oakesdale Avenue SW to the west, developed areas (fill) to the south, and the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site to the east. Topography within the wetland is quite flat, with a few micro-depressions that trap water. Wetland B-1 is separated from Springbrook Creek by a berm (the Oakesdale Avenue Mitigation Site) and by Wetland B-2. A culvert appears to carry water into Wetland B-1 from the west under Oakesdale Avenue SW; however, no flow was observed during the field investigation and there was no evidence ofa channel. Shallow areas of inundation were found along the eastern side of Wetland B-1 near the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site. Water appears to directly enter Wetland B-1 as precipitation, and via elevated groundwater levels. Tn addition to Wetland B-1, two other wetlands (B-2 to the east and B-3 to the north) are located in Unit B. Two vacant parcels (a Boeing site and Unit C) are located to the west of Wetland B-1 on the opposite side of Oakesdale Avenue SW. Southwest 2ih Street is located to the north of Wetland B-1, and the properties to the north of the road are occupied by commercial buildings. A newly built strip-mall is . located south of Wetland B~I. Vegetation along the road edges is dominated by domestic grasses and non-native forbs. Himalayan blackberry is prevalent along edges and in disturbed areas. Wetland B-1 is a relatively large wetland with mUltiple habitat types. These habitats are fragmented by roads and development, and the natural vegetation has been altered significantly. Buffers are narrow and disturbed, except on the east. Wetland B-2 Palustrine forested and emergent Category 3 10 acres In Unit 8/10 acres overall Wetland B-2 is a riparian wetland 10 acres in size, and includes palustrine forested and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested area dominates the majority of the wetland, and the emergent areas are located in the northeast and northwest comers of the wetland (see Figures 1 and 3). Vegetation in the forested area is dominated by Pacific willow, although Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) is present in the northern portion of the forested area. Red osier dogwood is the dominant understory plant, although Himalayan blackberry is also present. Herbaceous species in the forest include reed canarygrass, bittersweet nightshade, and hedge bindweed. Stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and yellowflag iris (Iris pseudacorus) are also common in some areas. Emergent portions of Wetland B-2 are dominated by reed canarygrass, but common cattail, and mild waterpepper are also present in areas with seasonal ponding. Soils in Wetland B-2 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et a1. 1973). The soils observed in Wetland B-2 are similar to those found in Wetland B-1 (dark to very dark grayish brown silty loam to silty clay loam with fine redoxyrnorphic features). Wetland B-2 is located in a depression bordered by SW 27th Street to the north, developed areas (fill) to the south, and berms to the east and west. The topography of Wetland B-2 is relatively flat, with a few micro-depressions that trap and hold water. Shallow inundated areas were found in the northern third of Wetland B-2. Wetland B-2 is separated from Springbrook Creek by a maintained berm. A small ditch begins in the forested area on the northern third of Wetland B-2. The ditch extends through the berm to Springbrook Creek. This ditch effectively drains the northern portion of the wetland. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A culvert on Springbrook Creek upstream of Unit B has historically constricted flow of the stream, resulting in flooding of adjacent areas. To alleviate this and associated upstream flooding north of SW 27th Street, the culvert under the road was recently replaced (1999). This replacement subsequently removed the constriction of flow through Springbrook Creek. Since this constriction has been removed, the impact of Springbrook Creek on the hydroperiod of Wetland B-2 is unclear. The remaining buffers of Wetland B-2 are somewhat wider than those of Wetland B-1. The Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site and Wetland B-1 are located to the west of Wetland B-2, and Springbrook Creek and Wetland A-I are located to the east. The northern edge of Wetland B-2 extends to the fill slope of SW 27th Street, which is dominated by domestic grasses, non-native forbs, and Himalayan blackberry. New construction is located to the south of the wetland, and associated parking surfaces extend nearly to the wetland edge. Wetland B-2 is a relatively large wetland with multiple habitat types. The system provides a connection between Wetlands B-1 and A-I as well as to other habitats along Springbrook Creek, the BNSF Railroad, and the Green River. Wetland B-3 Palustrine forested Category 3 0.3 acre In Unit B/O.3 acre overall Wetland B-3 is a relatively small (0.3 acre) palustrine forested wetland (Cowardin et a!. 1979). It is located in a swale between Wetland B-1 and SW 2th Street, and extends west to Oakesdale Avenue SW (see Figures I and 3). Vegetation in Wetland B-3 is similar to the forested portions of Wetland B-1 and includes a canopy of red alder and Pacific willow, with red osier dogwood in the understory. Himalayan blackberry is also present, particularly in the eastern half of the wetland, and on the road prism of SW 27'h Street. Herbaceous vegetation in Wetland B-3 is sparse, although scattered reed canarygrass and common horsetail (Equ;selum arvense) are present. Soils in Wetland B-3 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam (Snyder et a1. 1973), and the observed soils are similar to those found in Wetland B-1, although some gravels are present. Wetland B-3 is separated from Wetland B-1 by a berm. It is unclear whether Wetland B-3 was excavated and the berm constructed from the excavated material, or if the berm was constructed from fill material from some other location. Water in Wetland B-3 appears to be provided by runoff from SW 27th Street. Groundwater may also playa role in the hydrology of this wetland. The buffers for Wetland B-3 include Wetland B-1 to the south and the fill slopes for Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 27th Street to the west and north. The eastern buffer is predominantly Himalayan blackberry, and extends along SW 27th Street to the Oakesdale Avenue SW Mitigation Site. The northern and western buffers are narrow (less than 20 feet wide), limited by the presence of the roadways. Wetland B-3 is small and subject to frequent disturbance. Trash is common in the wetland and its buffers. As a result, it provides little habitat for wildlife, and likely has low relative value. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .... ;;m W.ahlngton 81a .. .", Dep_anl of Tranapootallan 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Unit C Project biologists delineated three wetlands (C-l, C-2, and C-3) in Unit C on October 22, 26, 27, and 28, 2004 and on November 2,3, and 5, 2004. A summary of these wetlands is provided below. Wetland C-l Palustrine forested and scrub/shrub Category 2 21.2 acres In Unit C/33.9 acres overall Wetland C-l is a palustrine forested-scrub/shrub depressional wetland (Cowardin et a1. 1979) approximately 33.9 acres in size, 21.2 acres of which are within Unit C. Wetland C-l is located along the north and east sides of Unit C, and extends northward onto Boeing property (see Figures 1 and 4). Pockets of scrub-shrub communities occur within the larger forested community. Most of these shrub communities have hydric soils and are dominated by wetland vegetation, although there are several small areas offill material within the larger wetland matrix vegetated by monocultures of Himalayan blackberry. Vegetation in Wetland C-l includes a canopy of red alder and black cottonwood, with an understory of Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis), red osier dogwood, and hardhack (Spiraea douglasii). Herbaceous species in the forested areas include a mixture of creeping buttercup, bittersweet nightshade, and reed canarygrass. Shrub communities in Wetland C-l include Pacific willow, red osier dogwood, hardhack, and Himalayan blackberry. Soils in Wetland C-l are mapped as a mixture of Woodinville silt loam and Puyallup fine sandy loam (Snyder et a1. 1973). The soils observed in wetland test pits were generally dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) silt loam with fine redoxymorphic features. Previous studies (Parametrix 2002) indicate that some portions of Wetland C-l may be comprised offill material. Wetland C-l appears to receive water from precipitation and from elevated groundwater levels. A ditch crosses Wetland C-l near the northern property line, but does not appear to provide water to Wetland C-l. Rather, this ditch appears to have been constructed to convey water away from Wetland C-l and under Oakesdale Avenue SW through a culvert north of Unit C. A shallow swale with no defined channel does cross the central portion of Wetland C-l, traveling from north to south. This swale appears to be a remnant of the original drainage shown on the soil survey (Snyder et a1. 1973). Wetland C-l extends east to the edge of the fill prism of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The road slope is dominated by a dense thicket of Himalayan blackberry adjacent to the wetland. Closer to Oakesdale Avenue SW, the right-of-way consists of mowed grasses with disturbance-tolerant forbs (lance-leaf plantain [Plantago lanceolata], tansy [Tanacetum vulgare], teasel [Dipsacus sylvestris], and thistle [Cirsium vulgare]). North of Unit C, Wetland C-l includes emergent areas dominated by reed canarygrass and disturbed upland meadows. The area immediately west of Wetland C-l is primarily Himalayan blackberry, grading into the emergent portion of Wetland C-2. The areas to the south of Wetland C-l include dense thickets of Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius), and a surrounding meadow with mixed grasses (bentgrasses [Agrostis spp.], orchard grass [Dactylis glomerata], and ryegrass [Lolium sp.]) and disturbance-tolerant forbs (lance-leaf plantain, St. Johnswort [Hypericum peiforatum], tansy, and thistle). Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 12 Source: WSDOT; 2003, King County; 2003, City of Renton; 20031 G:lprojectIlTlap_docsIEEIISpringbrookIFor_BOC_packageloutgoInglsprlngbrook_site C_wotlands_only,rnxd 1 Last Updatod: 5-t 1-05 I ::::;p 0 , , I ~ , I c::-n :::J _. _. (Q (J) -C :J '"0 nca r0-c: w < ..., ~~ -a CO & -Cil '< iii ro-CO Co :::J ~ Co ~ c. 0-CO c ~ ~ !!. w :;' en :J it Co CD DI -cr. ~ 0 CO :::J ~ 0 W :J ~ ii 8 Co m+z m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Wetland C-I is a relatively large wetland with multiple habitat types. Songbirds and raptors (likely red- tailed hawks) were observed in the wetland and in the adjacent uplands, and a raptor nest was observed. Coyotes were also observed in this area. Connectivity to other habitats is very good, making this a desirable location for restoration. Wetland C-2 Palustrine forested and emergent Category 3 5.8 acres in Unit C/48.5 acres overall Wetland C-2 is a palustrine forested and emergent depressional wetland (Cowardin et al. 1979) approximately 48.5 acres in size; 5.8 acres of Wetland C-2 are within Unit C. The forested area occupies the eastern and southern portion of wetland C-2, and the emergent community occurs in the west alongside the BNSF Railroad right-of-way (Figures 1 and 4). Vegetation in the forested area is dominated by black cottonwood and Pacific willow with an understory ofScouler's willow, red osier dogwood, and Himalayan blackberry. The emergent community is dominated by reed canarygmss. Soils in Wetland C-2 are mapped as Woodinville silt loam and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in Wetland C-2 are dark grayish brown silt loam with medium-sized redoxymorphic features. As noted above, portions of Wetland C-2 may include fill soils (Parametrix 2002). Topography in Wetland C-2 is relatively flat and evenly sloped, although hummocks are present in emergent areas. Wetland C-2 appears to receive water from precipitation and from elevated groundwater levels. A north-south running ditch divides the forested portions of Wetland C-2 from the emergent communities. This ditch continues north beyond the wetland boundary before turning east and entering Wetland C-I. As noted in the description of Wetland C-I, the ditch appears to have been constructed to convey water away from Unit C. Wetland C-2 extends to the edge of the BNSF right-of-way on the west. The vegetation to the north of Wetland C-2 is dominated by Himalayan blackberry. A large, disturbed upland is located to the east of Wetland C-2 (see description of upland west of Wetland C-I). Wetland C-2 extends south beyond the boundary of Unit C with similar vegetation communities throughout the system. Wetland C-2 is a large wetland with mUltiple habitat types. Songbirds, raptors, and coyotes were observed in Wetland C-2 and in the adjacent uplands. As noted for Wetland C-l, connectivity to other habitats is very good, making this a desirable location for restoration. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ..... ;;z; W .. 1l1ngton atato ..", Department of T,e~tlon 14 I I I I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I Wetland C-3 Palustrine forested Category 3 0.9 acres in Unlt C/48.5 acres overall Wetland C-3 is a palustrine forested depressional wetland (Coward in et al. 1979). It is connected to Wetland C-2, and the wetland complex extends offsite to the south. The total size is approximately 48.5 acres (including Wetland C-2), but the portion of Wetland C-3 in Unit C is approximately 0.9 acre. It is located in the southern-central portion of Unit C, north of the BNSF warehouse on Oakesdale Avenue SW (Figures 1 and 4). Wetland C-3 extends offsite to the south and west, and appears to be connected to Wetland C-2 beyond the Unit boundary. Wetland C-3 has a canopy of black cottonwood and Pacific willow, with an understory of red osier dogwood, Himalayan blackberry, and Sitka willow. Herbaceous vegetation is largely absent. Soils in Wetland C-3 are mapped as Puyallup fine sandy loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The observed soils are dark grayish brown gravelly loam with fine redoxymorphic features. Soils in Wetland C-3 may include fin as noted in Wetlands C-l and C-2 (parametrix 2002). A small drainage formerly traversed Unit C, but it appears to have been buried by subsequent activity on the site. This buried drainage may still provide subsurface water to Wetland C-3. Other potential sources of water include direct . precipitation and elevated groundwater levels. A large disturbed upland is located to the north and west of Wetland C-3. This upland is several feet higher than the surrounding wetland and appears to be comprised primarily of fill material. Vegetation in the upland is dominated by invasive species including Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom, with mixed grasses and disturbance-tolerant forbs (see description of southern buffer for Wetland C-l). A disturbed emergent wetland community (primarily bentgrass sp.) is located to the south of Wetland C-3, and a commercial/light industrial site with associated parking is located to the southeast of Wetland C-3. Although Wetland C-3 is small and relatively disturbed, it provides a valuable pocket of habitat bordered on one side by an industrial area. Wetland C-3 is connected to other relatively large wetlands and uplands to the north and south, and the nearby BNSF right-of-way provides a linear corridor connecting Wetland C-3 to other habitats. UnitD Project biologists visited Unit D on October 21, 2004, and delineated one wetland (D-l). A summary of Wetland D-l is provided below. Wetland D-1 )alustrlne forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent Category 2 5.6 acres In Unit D/6.7 acres overall Wetland D-l is approximately 6.7 acres in size; 5.6 acres ofthe wetland are in Unit D (Figures 1 and 5). The wetland includes palustrine forested, scrub/shrub, and emergent communities (Cowardin et al. 1979). The forested areas are located primarily along the BNSF right-of-way and to the south. Portions ofthe forested wetland extend north off of the site. The emergent community covers the eastern and northern portions of Wetland D-l. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ... =z; W."'lngton lila .. .. " ...... _1 of T .. "--,,,lIon 15 I I I I I I I I I I Figure 5 Unit D Wetland Delineation I o Parcel o Surveyed Wetland I <I[) Interpreted (off-site) Wetland Data Plot W+E s 200 I 400 Feel I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I I Vegetation in the forested areas includes red alder and black cottonwood; Pacific willow and Oregon ash in the canopy; and salmonberry (Rubus spectabiJis), red osier dogwood, and hardhack in the understory. Reed canarygrass, lady fern (Athyriumfilixfemina), and creeping buttercup are the dominant herbaceous species. Vegetation in the emergent community is dominated by reed canarygrass, common cattail, and mild waterpepper. Wetland 0-1 is situated in a depression with relatively steep slopes to the east and west. Topography within Wetland 0-1 is flat, with a few micro-depressions and many hummocks in the emergent area. Soils in Wetland D-l are mapped as Snohomish silt loam and Puget silty clay loam (Snyder et al. 1973). The soils observed in test pits were generally grayish brown (10YR 5/2) silty clay to silty clay loam. Fine redoxymorphic features were common in most areas. Water appears to enter Wetland D- 1 directly as precipitation, and via elevated groundwater. Several areas of bare earth with cracked soil were observed in the emergent areas. Wetland D-l occupies the majority of Unit D. The southern third of the unit includes an existing mitigation site, which is bordered on the north by a dense thicket of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). East of Wetland D-l, a narrow, mowed area with planted shrub (primarily oceanspray [Holodiscus discolor] and red osier dogwood) separates the wetland from adjacent parking and commercial buildings. The southeastern buffer is dominated by black cottonwood with a dense understory of Himalayan blackberry. On the west, Wetland D-l extends to the edge of the maintained BNSF right-of-way. A railroad spur and several undeveloped parcels owned by the railroad complete the northern buffer. Wetland 0-1 is a relatively large wetland with multiple vegetation types. The buffers are disturbed, particularly those to the east and west; however, those to the north and south contain relatively extensive areas of open space. The BNSF right-of-way provides connections to other habitats to the north and south. UnitE Unit E is a triangular parcel located east of Oakesdale Avenue SW, approximately 400 feet south of SW 34th Avenue in Renton (Section 25, T23N, R4E). No wetlands were identified on this parcel (Figure 1). The flooded fringe of Springbrook Creek does conform to the wetland definition, however, and is discussed below. Unit E was filled within the last 20 years. The site is roughly 15 feet higher in elevation than the adjacent creek. Unit E is vegetated with ruderal species and colonizing trees and shrubs. Along the stream banks, red alder trees have established a well-developed canopy over most of this section of stream. The understory is dominated by reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry. The flooded fringe of the creek is completely dominated by reed canarygrass. Soils are composed of gravelly sandy loam that was placed as fin, and silt loam may represent historic floodplain soils. Hydrology is primarily maintained by the surface water of Springbrook Creek. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 17 I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I' I, I I References Cooke, S.S. 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Washington. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). 1997. Washington State wetland identification and delineation manual, Publication #96-94. Olympia, Washington. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report V- 87-1, Environmental Laboratory, Department of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Greytag Macbeth Corporation. 1994. Munsell soil color charts. Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 2003. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. Parametrix, Inc. 2002. Wetland Mitigation Banking Plan for the City of Renton. Prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the City of Renton. Renton, Washington. Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone Pine Publishing, Redmond, Washington. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1997. Revision of the national list of plant species that occur in wetlands. U.S. Department ofInterior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. Renton, City of. 2004. Renton Municipal Code, Title 4, Chapter 3, Section 4 (available at http://www.mrsc.org/codes.aspx). City of Renton, Washington. Snyder, D.E., P.S. Gale, and R.F. Russell. 1973. Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington. USDA Soil Conservation Service, In Cooperation with Washington Agricultural Experimental Station. United States Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. USDA, NRCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2004. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2004. National Wetland Inventory, Renton, Washington Quadrangle. http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlndsllaunch.html. U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife Service. Portland, Oregon. WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2004. Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Prospectus. Prepared for WSDOT. Olympia, Washington. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). 2004. Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Information Packet. Prepared for WSDOT. Olympia, Washington. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .... ;;Z; •• Ihlngton etat • ..-" Dap_ent Df Tranlport.'lon 19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix A -Wetland Delineation Methods Wetlands are defined as areas saturated or inundated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and which under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. The methods used to delineate the on-site wetlands conform to methods in Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). All delineated wetlands were instrument-surveyed and mapped on project base maps. Field data sheets for wetlands are provided in Appendix B. To be considered a wetland, an area must have hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. HDR Engineering, Inc. staff collected data on these parameters in areas representative of typical site conditions. Staff collected additional data in associated uplands as needed to confirm wetland and stream boundaries. The wetland boundaries were delineated with numbered, bright pink flagging. Boundaries were numbered in the order in which they were encountered in the field, and numbering does not necessarily reflect geographic location. Vegetation The dominant plants and their wetland indicator status were evaluated to determine if the vegetation was hydrophytic. Hydrophytic vegetation is defined as vegetation adapted to wetland conditions. To meet the hydrophytic vegetation criterion, more than 50 percent of the dominant plants must be Facultative, Facultative Wetland, or Obligate, based on the wetland indicator category assigned to each plant species by USFWS (Reed 1997). Table A-I lists the definitions ofthe indicator categories. Table A·1. Definitions of Wetland Plant Indicator Categories used to Determine the Presence of Hydrophytlc Vegetation Wetland Indicator Category Obligate Wetland Plants Facultative Wetland Plants Facultative Plants Facultative Upland Plants Upland Plants Source: Reed (1997). Symbol OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL Definition Plants that almost always (> 99% of the time) occur In wetlands, but which may rarely « 1 % of the time) occur in non-wetlands. Plants that often (67 to 99% of the time) occur In wetlands, but sometimes (1 to 33% of the time) occur in non-wetlands. Plants with a similar likelihood (34 to 66% of the time) of occurring in both wetlands and non- wetlands. Plants that sometimes (1 to 33% of the time) occur in wetlands, but occur more often (67 to 99% of the time) In non-wetlands. Piants that rarely « 1 % of the time) occur in wetlands, and almost always (> 99% of the time) occur In non-wetlands. Project biologists used A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon (Cooke 1997) and Plants of the Pacific Northwest (Pojar and MacKinnon 1994) as field references to assist with plant identification. Scientific and common plant names follow currently accepted nomenclature. Most names are consistent with Flora of the Pacific Northwest (Hitchcock and Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ..... ;;m W .. /llngton 1111111 ."" Deportmont of Tranaportotlon A·1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Cronquist 1973) and the PLANTS Database (USDA 2004). During the field investigation, staff observed and recorded the dominant plant species on data sheets for each data plot (Appendix B). Soils Generally, an area must contain hydric soils to be a wetland. Hydric soil forms when soils are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (12 inches). Biological activities in saturated soil result in reduced oxygen concentrations and organisms tum to anaerobic processes for metabolism. Over time, anaerobic biological processes result in certain soil color patterns, which are used as indicators of hydric soil. Typically, low-chroma colors are formed in the soil matrix, and bright-colored redoximorphic features form within the matrix. Other important hydric soil indicators include organic matter accumulations in the surface horizon, reduced sulfur odors, and organic matter staining in the subsurface (NRCS 2003). Project staff examined soils by excavating sample pits to a depth of 16 inches or more to observe soil profiles, colors, and textures. Munsell color charts (Greytag Macbeth 1994) were used to describe soil colors. Hydrology Project staff examined the area for evidence of hydrology. Wetland hydrology criteria were considered to be satisfied ifit appeared that the soil was seasonally inundated or saturated to the surface for a consecutive number of days greater than or equal to 12.5 percent of the growing season. The growing for the area was determined based on the period in which temperatures are above 28 degrees F five years out often (Washington State Department of Ecology 1997). Temperature data from the two nearest stations (Kent and SeaTac, Washington) was reviewed. The Kent station was the more conservative of the two, and lists the growing season as extending from March 8 until November 11 (http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/). Primary indicators of hydrology include surface inundation and saturated soils. Secondary indicators of hydrology include drainage patterns, watermarks on vegetation, water-stained leaves, and oxidized root channels. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ..... ..,~ Washington 8tate ",J..., ~t 01 Tr.....,...aHon A·2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix B -Wetland Data Sheets Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 i I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: S fr~"v brIJ-., \<. Applicant/owner: DATA FORM l(Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) I VlYl:t A Date: 10 fl()! () 1 County: K~J State: \J It . InvestiRator(s): t11IAJ. PI rY1R R» SITIR: _~. I'Z. '3/1.} fZ,$F Do Nonnal Circumstances dxist on the site? ~ no Community ill: A;H Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ~ Transect ID: IA I"; t A- Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: ::L . Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator ~h ... h(s M"''IIk.,.. .. l/J-,... :# \.\-lt90 rr:lrGvJ "\ f/l-L .~. A-\",-",-, If '" \y '"' +--\1) StA\~~ IvtA'J~ ~ \" \1) rA-c\J \/, HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL. F ACW, & F AC lI> 0 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations ~ areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literahlre Z:-Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? GJ.7 no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: S~t~ ,> JOm ~"' .. kA "1 hy~Yl) fhft, t VL?e.-h. t ~" "" HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? @ no Water Marks: yes t? Sediment Deposits: yes @ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes{:;j Drainage Patterns: yes e::> v oilier (explain) lot."-' d._4..+"z. ).,.J; ..... Dept. of inundation: -D-inch~s Oxidized Root (live ro~ Local Soil Survey: yes nil,..) Channels < 12 in, yes no Depili to free water in pit: ~inches FACNeutral: yes ~ Water-stained Leaves yesi!lo) Depth to sahlrated soil: -'2. inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): . Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? (!Y no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ~--tvrA-~~ I ~ -t/A..t-f' I'~S; e.v, 1/ t!. (j-f ""111, oJtII).ttr/OoA-. e-........ i.J.,'U,.;t.v'(.. • { t-<-l. k7 &.,. ""51'. SOI£., SOILS Map Unit Name $" .... (, DIU.! 6" k-. SI' {; lo.«.-vvv (Series & Phase) ProfIle Description "'~"'->rItt.1l d ~ . 0 + Drainage Class po 0 .... (7 c2r"a-1 J- Field observations confirm Yes No e? Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size "& contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriQtion) D-lb -\. A (0 ~ ~ 3/2-l.~\j iii elf, f S~C I , Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ~ Matrix chroma::;; 2 with mottles __ Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils .25:-Reducing Conditions __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? r~, no Rationale for decisionlRemar: B ~ 1\ -rk h1~/:('" Jo'. \ ~ . c (:+£{~ tJ n. . LoW c.'n"""Y"''''' ""'(-.. '('Ai> kJ Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no G0 Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydrology present? (' yes 2 no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: --no+ {~\\S 5-1 \ tku.. L-~~+e.. v: 1'0. c. "').. ;5 4-k (f2. fr, "e W~ttA'A "'-../-L-+\,,~A. NOTES: I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Revised 4/971 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: C:;fr~"'J brplPk Applicant/owner: c DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) !AlA', -r ft Date: \o/z) /otf County: k~",) State: IN It- Investigator(s): \'1\\7:, '6H-SITIR: ~; 0-' T2-:'P1 R.9'e Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? (JP ~ Community ID: "Pf"'o Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: V\.I\~+ A- Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: z.. Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H == herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator S"'\';-X' \ \/(,./1 tA- f 'f7'*' \ ~D ,fAL\J ~l"h'" ~ ,A",\ I hY(\Mt V to ,FAc..vJ ~~ ... I t\t ~s "'"'" '\-\ 70 .~ALW "..r ... ",J:,,,,,,'\.e.,, , A!~.\ (""br ..... 4-\" 2-0 ~A-L RVt \ ~I) p'(IW..~';t..t-kh ~ J tv rite lA HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW. & FAC life-: 51)70 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database -L Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature .:::£.. Other (exp'lain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: S',t( is l"I')'\·."I'\+t.~ hi /.-~ ~{Of~~t:'-.jt..;~ h. +,'0", HYDROLOGY ~ Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes ~ on -Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: ~no Drainage Patterns: yes er v/ other (explain) \0 t.o..l c,..l ...... ~t~ ele~ L--.... Dept. of inundation: _O_inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes \t1 Channels <12 i~ no" Depth to free water in pit: ~inches FAC Neutral: yes (~?:/: Water-stained Leaves ~ no Depth to saturated soil: ~inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream. Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: h, ho 10)1 S· .. II:. show'S )1"1I\~"V' A ' )..' t-' J-~\k~.l ,.,.. ,L" '':)''') / SOILS Map Unit Name (Series & Phase) ProfIle Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) C? 'I~ A lD '1 Q. )/-z. 7, <; '1 ~/~ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) . __ Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime ~ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? :(!!fJ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: L,.,.; c..~(D""'~ (;o.""~ I'I'\c ~'e.!> t:-\\ r -tl-a- Wetland Determination (circle) .--". Hydrophytic vegetation present? (~ no Hydric soils present? ~ no Wetland hydrology present? es ~ no RationalelRemarks: ~ S··-\-e.. f, \-s ~tl +kv.u.. v y\ +-~If '1"'-) ~ ... ~ NOTES: 9l 6 J.... r t , V\UA/ ~ 1. ~ t: Drainage Class Poor'7 Jr:ru n.rJ( Field observations confirm Yes e? No Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descriQtion) ~ v-J I f: ~, fro¥l'\.~ WIt 8: C- >< Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local'Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) C.1f:~V: 6~ +0./ ~7~{·'1..-.so~ \ J B Is the sampling point no within a wetland? : s -tk v e.Jo./ L ...I~*\r. ,,"'-'" 0e..+L."A . Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: S" f' ~ ") b r 0117 \( lA,,:-\- Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland DeJineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland DeUneation ManuaD_ A Date: (0 ("Z-t/oi County: ~:''''-' State: vJA Investigator(s): ~\-\-MA SITIR: '50 17'2 ~ W. ~5" r; Do Normal Circumstances hist on the site? Gf no Community IIf: "pfo , Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? es @) Transect ID: 1A. ... :t A Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes & Plot ID: .3 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V =:= vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator ~ P h,.tM·'S 11'{",,,v\.'.,,,,,,4l..~ t\ Dt.D FAc::J S,,\:~ IG~""~.".J.{ .... ~ \" 7D ,fALL.) lAv-t; L 0'\ (t~( &: r\ li) \-Ac. -r f '/t.-l\l'~ \..,,\ ~o.""', {:"I'. >flt-_ l \b 'ffrL HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: -, % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC IQQ1~' Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database ~ Morphological adaptations -Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature .x Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (!ij> no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ~~'1tA"'Dfl..) \':1-"t:.)~t ... \: ~ J-o"",', '" '" .... ~ l'-' HYDROLOGY e Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes f!j' Sediment Deposits: yes ~ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes (§J Drainage Patterns: yes eJ V' other (explain) l"l ... 1 e.l."",...,tll. k..~ Dept. of inundation: ------inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes Q) Channels <12 in. yes ~ I Depth to free water in pit: ±inches FAC Neutral: yes Yo Water-stained Leaves yes ~ Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ~/ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: S " -\-V\ ~ '" \t.J., s O·\\.~ ·1"'-~i(.DI+(. wetl"V'~ 'k'1 ~XOID" '1 , SOILS Map Unit Name 7H:o\..... .. IM''bk 5,'11"' L.or-~ (Series & Phase) 10+3 """ Drainage Class foo ,.-IT Jrnlnevt Field observations confirm Yes No Taxonom """",Js. e? ProfIle Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriRtion) () . (1~ 4-(0"1 (2.z/'2" Lo i~)/b fV\"""11 !i;t.4.J Ah~:~~ ~ t(it d"1 I O~\IY\ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) 'i. Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles __ Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ? Reducing Conditions __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ((j no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: teN c.. kV"bvn~ kll'-rA V\Mtt~e> f.\l "tk ~~ f~ L-So.\5 (.1: te.v ~ i'> v"\ Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no C!!) Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydrology present? ((Yes) no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: -- ~,~ .P\\~ ~\~ We.J-c....v~tt....f~" I ~lAcA , +\,......,0. hI" <:.. ",,~+t-.'. '" I..I~-H,. ",,j\. \ , "- NOTES: ? (bi l bLq.-\t..1-ke-k~ Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I "'\ t DATA FORM 1 (Revised). Routine Wetland Determination I I. I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I (W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or , 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: t)fl'i ~ brook. -Uni B,' Date: /O/Iq/o'f Applicant/owner: County: KinJ State: VIlA Investigator(s): M: WI+!U, M, (Jo"kef1K.amp, P. Toqhel', B~ HollowtJ/\j S/TfR: ~B -T2.?>A! 1<.lf~ Do Nonnal Circumstances exist on the site? -' '@) no Community ID: 'PEP( 1, Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes @ Transect ID: 1.vi;"T(..APO 13-/. Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~ Plot ID: JJ./ , Explanation of atypical or problem area·: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator 51A..-hx. '/ VU1'il4. ~ 5 20, ~" ........ + 1'klc....r I c;. ~ru",J.1 * ff 85, .f tl-c, \.1,/ ,;u \iW"\ V ><-(L 1C!tIMt<.rt H ID I~ .c.:i"" .... , C r,., ~1.ltY. c.t..L.o r I.i S H /0 GEt-:. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL. FACW, & FAC ]O(J)g 2.(t-~IOO , Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in / PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations ~ areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database --"7 Morphological adap\ations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature 1/ Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? d'~15 no Rationale for deci,sion/Remarks: hjdrof0Jhc veJeTaho/J i~ dofYl in q,...1- HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? Q~ no Water Marks: yes @ Sediment Deposits: yes ® on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes(§) Drainage Patterns: yes@) , V' other (explain) Ih.Gf.Jl "l'''I-1oldoe. tlttft,. Dept. of inundation: _. _'_'_ inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels <12 in. yes ~ Local Soil Survey: yes@ Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: @, nb. Water-stained Leaves yes ®, Depth to saturated soil: " inches '/ Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? (yes) nO Rationale for decision/Remarks: PIP\( fll'f c( hjdrvp~hc v(, Je !'(J./i!)" In(llr nlrr:: l.ue Ua nd. h!:r11t) 10J 'f ' ~iG ·s s"'ff'0c-1~~ L1 , ~ ,L'L I ",--·.eR sc:..o." e.. r 0""+.,,.1-{I!.;~JL. ~ P' /'-e--;;<fl-v1 ~ 0{ t-cRt; c..,... <;0 ,ls ~ I (, ~ SOILS Map Unit Name ~ k-tn-nl ~~, Sf It Lot4Y1 (Series & Phase) ~/of*£ I I Field observations confim1 Yes No ~T=ax~o~n~o~m~~~~~=C=9~~~~==~~~~~~S~ ____ ~m~a~~ed~~e~? ____________ ~ ______ ~I Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-11 AI /oyR f/2., ? 5Yl< 4-/", I 1/7' II~ 7. '5 (R5/2 7,51Q5/& Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ----Histosol ____ Histic Epipedon ~ Sulfidic Odor ___ Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions ./, ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: @) no n4.,~ / D'W -eJ....v&rn. b.. Nt a.J-,.,' X. . / Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? &i!) no Hydric soils present? ~ no Wetland h'ydrolo~y present? eS) no RationalelRemarks: Iv~ P-U "3 .. hVI.tJ) Dd-oY, fA NOTES: Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc, profile (match descrigtion) 'many, .fine, '5: \~ I~ c/l S1-t' I1~T IY1 a",/.-r. Of.), rSE', r7 I' It l~ ." tl;,s41 )'lC+:' ---L Matrix chroma :5 2 with mottles ~ Mg or Fe Concretions -L High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils --L Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ____ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) IYI t:t,fn' X dt.....-th'}1 I{ !:: ';l vJ/ /I/l;I) tfle f I Is the sampling point within a wetland? ®, no ~ t:L.-.., e-e , Revised 4/97 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DA T A FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: <;fY"l'11j brook -Uhi+ i3. Applicant/owner: [nvestigator(s): 13. Ho flowa . .:J. /vt. /J()C,I< ~ f) /c...OMp. Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes c:JiO) Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes enD Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETA TlON . (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) , Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species .. -X Gp; lobi v~ cJ II·/t.-tt.l~~ II ~O Ob J §I/VL,x /L .. ·~ i "La.,.. ~/~' I A.,,-t 1-+0 II p..., i-II 20. o b / I . '--¥- J.J. 25 :£c-w PI)/!J1Qf.\iun, per.slcolJ·/t. . i '*' J.J '0-61 p(}/"qqt1UIY) hlJ~t"'OpjpaOldL "·0 . .~ .-" +-• .~ I", .'" J ,I IlL I'" t\,..-=::>,. V 30 I~+ .j.\olcJi i...,f.I"'c.. e\'C;l;'b1 ~f'" S Ir&lct Nt- HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC ~(6el~~1~ Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: /6/;;1.%+ County: j(in:J State: WA- SITIR: ~t; TZ._~/V Community ID: 'PGJ,.{. Transect ID: /#a/-A.vr;, Plot ID: flo/-1/ cJ. Stratum % cover X T. /0. Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation ~ Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations ~ Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical ~iterature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? CE9 no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ~) 01 rvp ':!J It c y'~ h<.iirrf1 15 d/)mi ntVIl. HYDROLOGY ~«..fE 8-( Indicator {a,uuA-. + -- Is it the growing season? @ " Water Marks: cJ§f::>. no' Sediment Deposits: yesC!lV no on s&.Y!d.b~ :f:) g ;nUJ~' Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes ~ Drainage Patterns: yes@ v other (explain) loctt,..' e,(, ..... ,,_:'c~ ~ Dept. of inundation: -1-inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels < 12 in. yes no "'1 Water-stained Leaves ye@ Depth to free water in pit: zJ;/!Linches FAC Neutral: yes no Depth to saturated soil: ~inches , Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? C£!) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 6f t;;crlu r of eel' .~ ~-ferIll\.4,..1"'4 A..c-<.. 1""'£,'C.tCt'~ so/Is. ~ ~'PreGUW1Ve I we--d ~& ,-/1. ~ll ! o~ f . ... •. 1 SOILS Map Unit Name B!\.O k:nMI'6b. Sr It . lu""W\.. (Series & Phase) Drainage c;lass fo~(I~ Jr-aJ'Ylq J I I ~T~ax~o~n~o~m~~~~~L=~~~====~~~=ii=v~~~_.~ ________ ~F~i~e~ld~O~b~s~e~~~:~;_io_n_s_c_o_n_fi_lm __ 1 ___ y_e_s ____ ~ ____ ~1 'Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriQtion) 0-1'++ 4· /OYP.3!::J. / D ,/12 tf/ (p Ce>mmon, Pine. ~illy clel'l loam PI" t>ty) i 11 en t. Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) / Matrix chroma :5 2 with mottles ~Histosol ~ Histic Epipedon --L Mg or Fe Concretions ~ Sulfidic Odor ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils + Aquic Moisture Regime --L Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ ?_ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List -L Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: c>xidiucl roof-Ch4.nne/S'/ redu'uy c.~n d,'f;on'i, lovv t-hr()Ma. wi mtJf/l e 5. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? @ no Is the sampling point @> no Wetland hydrology present? 6et> no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: frio:! , &<-11 3 wellan d in diet? ron. NOTES: Revised 4197 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I ,/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: . Applicant/owner: ' .. .~' . DATA FORM It(Revised) Routine Wetland n&termrlJ.~tion (WA State Wetland Deliit~a~iQ'~'~Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland De~pea·ti"6:n Manual) Date: /(')/:<tJ/o'l- County: ~."1J ) State: wA. Investigator(s): 6. f/;1/tJw~ 1m. fiYJ'! .. k.u Ie A ...,.., S/TIR: 2...5: TZ;:,V Te.l.fe Do Nonnal Circumstances exisron the site? ~ . 'riO::,:;:' IS'the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ~., .... ,;: •. ,.,.,.,.,.,.,: .. :.:.,.~.::~ .. !.: .. ,. Community ID: W!.tltU1d -#-13:-/ Transect ID: Is the area apotentjal'Problem AXea? .' 'yes ~ Plot,ID: PI{)f ~3. " Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = her1;lrV:,=vine) :;~:. " . Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator ~p,l~ III(.;iJo-11,,-4-V';t I c.,,, lAM-J ,"." T 10 ( -fi, t-Ii--"\:-) A.t VlV5, r'.j,·bC-A-i-S /5 +a..-c.- ,..~.: S. Trau. ~o-J eJ~V\~' SP~ rive A.. ~~. /I fJ - HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATIONlNDlCATORS: % of dominants OBL. F ACW, & F AC Z(e; / 0010 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: D'o~inimt Pla'nt Species < .. J:;.: ,,','\ .. . ..: ...... , : ,.' ,:,' .;.~;,.~.: .,:: . ,"',':' . Stratum v---, , Physiological/reproductive adaptations Wetland plant database % cover Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundationlsatllfation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: 8' no tJ~ f2 '\"/!L"t7 rr ~ /' S d.c""'t. j ~ i~J:. HYDROLOGY Indicator Is it the growing season? ~. no Water Marks: UP? no on+ce~s --.. Sediment Deposits: . yes no Based on: _. _~_ soil temp (record temp ___ ) 7 other (explain) I q CA.I U 1:.::--aJ ..... Dept. of inundation: -1-inches Depth to free water in pit: ..2liL inches Depth to saturated soil: ~ inches' Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage data: __ Aerial photographs: Wetland hydrology present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ~ ~ -t oJ f"',.<.:t e.~ <:; 0 .' I .s ev.-....R ..?"c--eJI..; Lv of:'t. (CUVt.J? t... ,;:.p,.. .. I O~ ~ ( ...; , Other: no ) ",-. Drift Lines: yes· no ',. ' :"', Oxidized Root.(l~ots) Ch1lrinels <12 m(yw no FACNe\ltral: yes no ;." OtiJer (explain): ':. Drainage Patterns: yes no Local Soil Survey: yes no Water-stained Leave~ no .:.. SOILS Map Unit Name wo~;~ Y\ v,' 1l~ "5; l-t lo~ (Series & Phase) F 1?XI~,.,d f6-IHo.J--~I ti.·.:~!;<Drainage Class fo, orl\{ dr~lvtJ I ?*:. : :.... T :~: ...... ::.~!: ~;~t> :'::,:: Field observations confimi Yes @ Taxonom v~~ i~',:',>,:;2; 'rna ed, e?' ~~~~~~~==--~~;~>:"~, ~~--------~I Profile Description D~pth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell ~ moist) moist) 0-141-A, /0 ylZ f:J. {O '/ (l. 'If (p Hydric ,Soil Indicators:, (check-all that apply) Histosol -- __ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor -- Aquic Moisture Regime ==:iZ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ' l..-ol.i-l ct..1"Q~~ 'Ec:l~ vui-t-k.. {'Jar Wetland Determination (circle) . Q Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Hydric soils present? ~ no Wetland hydrology present? ~ no RationalelRemarks: ~ :3 ~7~ ~,~C~~IYS w .' ""t1A.. 'Y\. ~ ..vd/tVYll NOTES: ?~~:..~ '~'.; .. ·::: .. C':" '. : ~. :<:-;. ~ Mottle abufi'a~nce Texture, concretions, ~rawing of soil .,.: .. ~: .. size & contrast': structure, eic.~ profile . ".~, . ',' .. :,.," . (match descriI;!t1on) ...... In tUj J. h'),~,~':, WYl, d/s-hA!;J: ' Si/~ c(~ /~am - <:.:"::.: . :-:~:: . '~~'., ~. , ':,<,: /~'~trix chroma :5 2 with mottles __ Mg orFe Concretions __ 'High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ .Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) fl@.,-tv":~ ~,..e-{J. ~ cd'"l.Ie,- Is the sampling point within a wetland? ~, " " " , , ':""'.' ,.: '.: :~,! ;i;~} ".~ ~~ " ":";.:., -rt..o.... ~rl;; 0-( £yd ('/ &-76} is. , C@), no " , , 1c:;,'ualo'1,.. ,5 Revised 4/97 I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ;,' ", ;~;; DATA FORM Jt(ReviSed) , Routine Wetland ~ter~,~~:~tion (WA State Wetland Deljij~atiC)i.(Manual or '. I 1987 Corps Wetland 'Dcnri~a.t1bh Manual) Project/Site: Srn'1'I brrrrrl:-~Po-',:t :':, ,,''';'; Date: /(J/~"/(; {-,) , ;!i:~:;:;',:~:·};,: County: /~ . I Appl icant/owner: P,1/7~~~vk_ Jt;::;h): Investigator(s): 8, ~~"~-M.. State: w'IJ, SITIR: ,-S' T.z. ~.v, F. ~ t:! I Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ,~ , ii'iJ ,:,"':' ' Community Ib: M'd3" ' '.' I Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical siruati.on)? yes ~:," Transect ID: . Is tbe area a potentjalProblem Area? yes ~~r' Plot"ID: Plof It f,) (N<!.o't~.Q "P" ,,;/ Explanation of atypical or problem area: I VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T c: tree; S c: shrub; H = her*V'~~ine) .~~:, .: . . ~~ t Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dori,iinllnt Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator T~";~'/ ' I"~i&~ ,v&v"" 1.J::t . t.....c:. 'etA/\}..r;v' -r 90 1(~,iU\ , PkAJ:(~;"IS' " lVJ.J{~de. i.---I-f /5, fOo-V~, 1L1!L~ ~v..L vL.,~ 'I' tlI'J::V HI <-J-I. 85. ~(.,,J \ I I .':;', "::,,, , I );(, ' I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATIONlNDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC tOO?/'> -i/", I Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations --L I areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --v' Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (explain) I Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~,' no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: t)~~1 QY'\-, .... ~ ~ ""'" " ",.dv;t2-'by ~r0r7il" ?~d.-d' I HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? @ no W~ter Marks: ~ no --, , Sedirr:tent Deposits:@ no I on, Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Unes: yes ' no Drainage Patterns: yes no ~ other (explain) I 'OGA..i c,..r,l1.-,a..~ I, Dept, of inundation: -4-,inches OX,i,dized' Root ~~ootS) Local Soil Survey: yes no I Channels <12 in 'ye no Depth to free water in pit: ~inches F A,.C'l'I!clJtral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Depth to sarurated soil: ..fJ:!L inches .... I Check all that apply & explain below: Oti)e~ (~xplain): Stream, Lake or gage data: " --.. " Aerial photographs: Other: ", ' ' Wetland hydrology present? ~, I no ':!:.:: Rationale for decisionlRemarks: v,:' ; ,."..,jl, cdJ,' ()t,.. ~ we,.-H~ ¥to/o~~ s J2I W\ouwJ:J eJle.F "'J11:.s ~ ....... a.,t~~,.'=-~ :i,'iJt-.rQ... :.~;> . :~.?:~ .. ;'. -= "" . I .. ;:: .... . n ~ ~ SQILS'----~~----------~----~~~rr.,~·--~7T~~-~~d~~~-TI--~~~~-- ~ ... >··.:i;:.: :. ... ,;:...:_.-..::::;.....;;..;:;:;---: Map Unit Narrie WooJtn'I/I/-t./ .~) 4-loaM. ~F,,;'!:~T::Drainage Class :poo,-11 kuV!()..t (Series & Phase) 1::"'}J' Field observations confinn@ . No ~T~a~x~o~n~om~~==~~~==~~======~=v=~==~S ______ ~r*i~j:~045~:'_m~a~~ed~~e~? ______________________ ~11 ..... , :'" Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell .. moist) moist) 6 -If4-A /0 yl2 3/~ 1,5y5/~ Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol --__ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor --__ Aquic Moisture Regime. __ ' Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? <@ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: J"?( iotA £e d....nrH-s Jv(2..r-.,z... o/:.soe~· 61",-, t::-~r-o-...-.~ 1Vl.&V T,...,')< w,7k. r-Jo)t. Wetlan'd Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? C§ no Hydric soils present? @ no Wetland hydrol()gy present? ()IeS) no RationaIeJRemarks: . , A.M. 3 -woI1 (}vrt. ,j U-rt.iJV' ~s /It1..J.. ' w..(/-rII'V>-1L - NOTES: .~tF~·/i:~·· ',' Mottle abuna~nce Texture, concretions, J?rawing of soil siz~ & cont~.~: structure, et~, profile (match description) .: .. : ,'" . /YJ MVq' :?fid; -/((/1 R"'l-~~:~ ~/ S~( i" lo~ " , ... ;:;' ',,~. . ",,' ... ~ . . ';:' ~. :::; : ", :~.: ~:Q~trix chroma :5 2 with mottles __ . Mg or: Fe Concretions __ ' High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ brganic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ . Listed'on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) 1(bViv~ JtC-1~f:. ~ v...'1.t:£l', '" .;, :(5 ~r, 'fuy'CJ '\t, Is the sampling point C@' no within a wetland? ".-",' Tk s~rluv I~u:d'j 411...- I , J,U1-t4/M I 'f, A.- .,. " ',' '" I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I .-~ '.' ,." Revised 4/97 I ":;"'" . ,.', , I -_.-.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . Project/Site: , " , (' . ';;ftillJ brtJoK - Applicant/owner: ()/Ji! DATA FORM 1 (Revised) \~, \ Routine Wetland Determination (WA St~te Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) 8. Date: 10/20/0'1 County: I<i h .J State: WA-. Investigator(s): /3. 1Io//()w~ ~ P 104;'~r /11, Ihd~n M, B~ckenl::.~ll-tn SITIR: 2-? Tz.~,v R..-'-If!, Do Normal Circumstances exist on the 'SIte? C§ no I Community 10: l'tH '.' .. Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ® Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes C® Plot ID: PIoI-'II I j Iv<..o~ 'B-"C... . Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator . -* [:,5. +~G-I.V Pk\&<.ris j(.~irll!lPl" II- ~rp~ liII.;" .-{c; /, ',V II-/5 "(Jot I ~I'i~onvn:. P(l.,i.,,'(Af1 "'-t1 /5. ~LV ,'" " ' , .t .. ~."alull1\Jc.. ,C;.D.'n1 UW\,. 11 T NI.- I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC ,II" IW~" Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in / PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations -....:....-. areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database ~ Morphological adaptations '. Personal knowledge of regional plant communities ~ --" Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? c® no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: h'jc7ropl"'J he Vf:Jelc,-/;on I, c10miila nf HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? C§ no Water Marks: yes @) Sediment Deposits: yes@ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes ® Drainage Patterns: ye~ IL other (explain) \OCtL' C('WifL.-tot. d' a;f{.... Dept. of inundation: --1-inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in, yes no Depth to free water in pit: 7 inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves ye0~ Depth to saturated soil: -tL inches 5Cf~f.:·nft: <I "f-.<:. , :'(1( j. Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial. photographs: Other: Wetiand hydrology present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: <';;01/ ~ CI It" F{l I f' rl (."17 f' SfCl nr(; 113 I.A-lClIr.r ;"1 plf. '" 5't.li~ f 1.1 ,.. C " "" SOILS Map Unit Name S~bc""""",,4. c $, It \o~ (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) mo{st) 0-l'f.j A· 10 y-!2 tl-12. /0 y/Z. s/-g. IDy/t. '-I-/~. Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) . ' --Histosol __ '. _ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor --~quic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? c§) no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: @. Field observations confiml Yes e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descril2tion) Common. '{:ine, Si/ht clay p "-"rnin ~ n +- Cornrhon, A 11<; prOlni /1~nf /' Matrix chroma :5 2 with mottles --__ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ ._ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarksl I I I I I I I I I 1}7 a+,.-i X C h rom a. ~ 2 wi fh moNies J M~ -rWz.. Yf(c.... c;,o,'! (!.... r. 'of e..r J' <11"1 • Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? aID no Hydric soils present? "'Q§) no Wetland hydrology present? ~ no RationalelRemarks: . In('t:i<) (XI/ !. IndiCttfort;.· j;r a wefl Cl. f) d. . ().J ..{.., "'tl~ ~ . NOTES: Is the sampling point within a wetland? ik S~f{e.. loetdi" )\, ,'C; ® no t.V i'1~ J n... 0.,.... Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Date: lojw/o 1- County: J(iny State: /Nil· S/TIR: z. 5 TZ,7,;v ~~ Do Nonnal Circumsiances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Is the area a potential Problem Area? Explanation of atypical or problem area: (:jpI yes yes no @ V Community ID: PS<;" Transect ID: I Plot ID: P/"f It. 2. Iwct"iM'lc. 13 ... z VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T == tree;S = shrub; H .;, herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum StJ--II)t: I",,,,,'eto,.. 1/#0.(", ~ r-J: , A...S i DW.e\ re.-S 80. 1/.f."..~) 1:-S ~I)-" Corl'\v~ se-.... , c.o~ 26. i- Pka"IIl-.\c;. o:.lV~1 "a.£.e~ H 50. I +n-c-LV' b"I'"e qro ,-,nd, /I 50 -......., HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 3(; "1:-1 oo'k Check all indicators that apply & explain below: . PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations Wetland plant database % cover Indicator Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other (explain) . Hydrophytic vegetation present? Cyes-:) no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ;; I 1J v<-6~'" t\.-:ce. .C<o~I'k ..... -te~ by "'f&" rorL...ffc... 1,re-ue..C; HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? no Based on: ___ soil temp (record temp ) 1/ other (explain) (0.:a...1 (!'\'KA ... 1e c-lea... Dept. of inundation: -Linches Depth to free water in pit: ~ inches De~th to saturated soil: I If inches Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage data: __ Aeri'al photographs: Wetland hydrology present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: Other: no. 4. r~ Water Marks: ~ no on. Drift Lines: yes<:§:) Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels <12 in, yes no FAc Neutral:, yes no Other (explain): Sediment Deposits: yesGD . Drainage Patterns: ~ no Local Soil Survey: yes no Water-stained Leaves(§no SOILS Map Unit Name Sl\;obgWl,'sz~ 6,'l't lo"'fA, (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) () -1'1-+. A /Oy121/z. 7 5y/2 41iP. Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol _'_ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor -' Aquic Moisture Regime ~ Reducing Conditions ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? ® no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: Drainage Class &orl~ of~nlQJ Field observations confim1 Yes No rna ed e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descriQtion) ma.ny, mcc/i('lfl"J, S ;(+1 d~ prominenf . ~ Matrix chroma:::; 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) oxidiz~c/ ,-niz.0pherc; re cluci n; eondifi()nt;, fl1t:J m)( chr()met ~~ c.oj ·rno1fler Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no cV Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydrology present? <YeS) no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: o...ll "3 a..r'~e....n II.-a..rc... r~' .Ik ~rk-{o~7iol1 (.:;, In tJ-{,V,t.:r!MlJ. dCfres~/oh +h~f ;'old~ t.AJofer i shrlAb co.nop! cIoesnf ct..Ilbw vt'Je-khM fo /gl'()W in half "f' ?/of-: ~TES: Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manuall Project/Site: . Sprf".j bi-oo/< -Uhi.J.:.f3 Applicant/owner: Investigator(s): . (j. ;J;/!owou;r , (n. BOlken Ic ... ~-f" . Do Nonnal Circumstances exist on .the site? C§ no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Cillh Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~ Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Date: IO/:lo/tJ 4-. County: I'() "J State: VVA-.. S/TIR: ).? T Z ?;,1.J , g Y ~ Community ID: pf'o Transect ID: Plot ID: P/~t 1J.311J..1~~ '&-'t Stratum % cover Indicator 'I·. I I I I I I ,I So...\~ }V~I'J'~ I (Lt •. &vvI 1. f ~ iI~"" . -* T go ,u'Z l~jtA) I I I I I I I I I I I . Cc.r 1"\.,J.c,. ~ If.r I O'.-A...- ~ S ~ +akU/ . t ." . ~~"w 'P~t:L.\a..r!'c. ()..rlJ...J."V'f)JA .... -H ~O ., .. . -t v '-'L Cd~ 1I~/Jj)lvc C~/IMII -z.o &~~ i ,',,) 1+ (J.O -e. ~ cjf'l ~ oJ , ' HYDROPIIYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL. FACW, & FAC 3/y :; 7 t5 "70 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual obsefvation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations -:7 areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database -;T Morphological adaptations 7-Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? CV no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: LI~.det..:\',"", ,'s ~~W\.,,,,-,,,"*"eJ2 ~7 ~Tly-Lc-r u 'V1' HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? 8)' no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: , soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no L,./ other (explain) tl>.:..a...t c../ ;lu-)~ Dept. of inundation: + inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes no Depth to free water in pit: ~inches F AC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves@ no . Depth to saturated soil: (P. inches' Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? CY~ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: - (}.o,ftv ode d. ~k· \N\...et-+ ~ W' -e.... -r{ (:(/Vlcf '(J2r6/0jj e--r. '-Ie,no n.. "" SOILS Map Unit Name ~MlysM(7k. $,' It (~\Vo. (Series & Phase) D+-~ I Drainage Class ?eor(y e(f'tA.,/VlC2J. I Taxononl ~~ Field observations confiml Yes No e? I Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-14+ A /oyP. 'f/OJ. !OYR3!(P Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol --__ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime _,,_/_ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? CS no Rationale for decision/Remarks. . (... ........ c-k ..... "", "-' ~"'"'-tr;)c I'-"'~ ..... .> ttlot t;. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hydrology present? es no Ra tion aleIRemarks: ~ tAft 3 "'J;vd/~ d. / h d.J (eJvvL NOTES: • Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile ° (match descriQtion) MCUlY, m~cI;l.Irn, ~i I~ clCtJ /oa.m promInent / Matrix chroma::; 2 with mottles _0_ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils _'_0 _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationalfLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) I' <: ,·~,'ca..""I.1'<..-of Yr,c-t;OI ~ ~ • Is the sampling point ® no within a wetland? ~ ~r/~ loG-edlbY\. ,'s /.-VI "tf...I'i'! ll,.. IAA., -f(~/~ Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I * I I ~ I . I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: V'" I~C- Applicant/owner: ':'\ ", DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (W A State Wetland Deline'aUon Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) ,Date: 10 ["2:-0(0,-( County: f:..I'vj State: "'--'9t I nvestiJ;(ator( s): ~ ~ oe.L.. ./) r fV1. r:s(J~ k.I4<P S/JIR: 2.-5 72..3"; 2~t3 Do Nonnal Circumstances' exist on the site? ~ no Community'1D: YfO Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ~ Transect ID: C C-~ l ~ Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: tN_ I Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator l'Po<Pj.I( .... 5 b4..\ 5~ l..er l?-T ~o f"'C/ Is~ c; t'T'c-!.v4i>l.s I <, :$"' '10 +'a...c..v-I SJ:,-'rt>-e-it, "''''' (tL-'7;'1 '5 ~o kw , v 1~'''r'\J6' , C <-l'J r_,,/I.· > " /() +~vJ, Ind'".:>~ <;.p -1-1 90 ;tiL' , -fpc., c..-l1'k ... L,~ ric. tt.r L .,Q , vV<.l '" /I. • .w 1...~ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBl, FACW, & FAC '-1/(7:. t36, 70 Check all indicators that.apply &,explain beiow: Visual observation of plant species gro~ing in . , Physiological/reproductive adaptations 7'" areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --' Wetland plant database --Morphological adaptations ~ Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydi-ophytic vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: J""5 JJ:tn,,'t. 0 ,/\ I") ;0"""" i'\-tJ •• :t cZ k. b7 (y'7.Jf~r/c.. Sf.;?CJ~ . HYDROLOGY , ' Is it the growing season? @ rio Water Marks: yes ,~ Sediment Deposits: yes (§J on ~ Based on: soil temp (record temp: ) Drift Lines: yes ~ Drainage Patterns: yes &; ./ other (explain) /oca..l ~I'; .;L,t-<:.-' d ,,,fa- Dept. of inundation: ',~inches ,Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil.'~urvey: yes ~ : Channels < 12 in, yes ~ ....... Depth to free water in pit: 2f.&... inches FAC Neutral: @}no Water-stained Leaves{yiSS no Depth to saturated soil: 2Ui.. inches Check all that apply & explain below: ' Other (explain): rf I ~ Stream, Lake or gage data: '" -U11.)'c;. ..... 'rJit.. "f'O'?,-h..J",-I "PrJ()J--c.''--''~~CA!. ( l P Aerial photographs: , " ---~ Other:" c;.tP..c.ri-ff!..,~l it') $fL.+/J (I'.fi.e[) CH..-J/t, 'OYI <" • We~l~nd hy~rol~~ pres~nt?: " ". d§Y... no r ' , RatIOnale for declsl0rJ.I'"Rettlflrk!!;!., ", Lv. fro? S; ,h-' t..v,,~ "--:''7'::/ r(.>/7 1'--Vv.c 1-1"""-k-:.1... '1~ou;,~ ,r'i"; "1 S. 1 ,: 5 '-""VI e tk.. .' {,,.~ (j "'--r f f ""J. (,'_v~';' ,,,,,,,0';,, ,:'0 :)0 ,c.:.,_ <J,-tkrL (61-. ~SC,:;l"p.p ;>tI'?''7"lb .... " .-.I ;, , ' :.:(::" "~,(i ;~ .. ' 1 : I of cJ -;4.;' :.! 1-bP( "4Ipt.. , ~,plD.i A o../f? 7 (..V A $, I 0. ~A.f.'f., ":-: ,r)lJ iA-' '.. ,-f::..'7 a. t.L -20 I ': i' " SOILS Map Unit Name !.VOcJ'!\J! He.. S,'h {.tOo.W\, . (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-/bt I! 10 \( ~ 'lit. 1,(",'1fl.. 7~ -'.:! j ~< Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix . Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for deCisiOnlRema~ '-<>....... o-l... r D Vk-"'-~ ~ rr<Z--5~~ we-.... ( IJi!}'" J2 s.c:I. Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? ~ no Wetland hydrology present? no RationalclRemarks: tL (( -,Lr-___ Q.,(\'-t e.rl 0-c~ F~S~' NOTES: -L Drainage Class 'Poor~ Om...."J. Field observations confirm Yes No e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descrigtion) W1 t\,~ )·e f..P.. )fro.14l~ !"' S ;lfy 16i.~ 'j Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (expJain in remarks) o-! -e.ac&--< ttA--fvr~ (oS ;' '" ,l, 'c.a:itJ .../ e. 6-f Is the sampling point t!§9 no within a wetland? ~. S~~ IbcA:ti" Y\ • I s "",;-ItA., "'-fA-IJJ -1,.:1 (evvv9 ./ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I ~ t j I I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: S~ (. V\ lo( 00 k Applicant/owner: ) DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (W A State Wetland Delineation Manu~1 or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineatinn Manual) V\ V\ 't+-L-' Date: 1 \/~/o ~ County: i< ~ V\ J State: v.I It" Investigator(s): 'P. -r",&.. Lu..-IU. 11\ \.rt~ SITIR: ""2..1'TZ.:;~, t !1 ~ Do Normal CircumstancesLfxist on/the site? ~~ Community IDtt"PU Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Transect ID: -I Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes 0 Plot ID: f)J3 W \ (C.-I) Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T == tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) ;/f)"! . . Doffii~~~t Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator -f~ OIA LA \ bAI~Jlk'~L,( P\ .~ Cf,D .{:ea..-v , i5 ILnin ~ )t;~{1 U flo... '7 ~t.J SOil (tV' dov.~/A!>i· S y~ IL,~.1 K,.I1A f'IJ\-./ ) /f.V t;),;/li'o(A S -,-~- f.'''''V\\,t vI (,.'-' \ <. v'lfl3~ W S-' tt:L!..W I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OSL, FACW, & FAC leD Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations ~ areas Of pro'ionged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities -- Technical Literature ,,-~ Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? U~!/) no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: jI, ' , /) ,1'1 " V. ~1 \-\.. \:_ ()~( k Y d1\VU ,~~' I, ( rT . lie.? eA t-'\ ~ 'C): ....... 1/ \ HYDROLOGY GJ Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes (9 Sediment Deposits: yes dii.l? on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes @ Drainage Patterns: yes ~ ~ other (explain) [0("_5.....( c...I iMlI-t~ ,vedA. Dept. of inundation: -=-inches Oxidized Root (live ro~ Local Soil Survey: yesc:§ Channels <12 in. yes ng) , Depth to free water in pit: --2La.inches F AC Neutral: (!j .'no Water-stained Leaves yesLJfEP"' Depth to saturated soil: -2.I..B-inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --rl"'I'\' G ( '\ Aerial photographs: Other: :>0' S Wetland hydrology present? C:Y no Rationale for decision/Remarks: l'fJllo ),'"/ +: l. JV\ e.\ "'-\ ;0 ..... (/'1')'" V111".L ~t7 ~\) \ .. l'Lh~L. ve.+I"V\ ~ kVJ Ic) I .:Ii '1 , I / - SOILS Map Unit Name P~~",I~ .(t,..~ ~ t~ (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon . Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) {Y~ .A-.~O~(1-l~ --. 1-t\~ ~1., JD'fi)}'t-10 '4{ ~(i I . Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor -- __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? ® no Rationale for decision/Remarks: -/-.Fo/t @8vJ-I1 Drainage Class w",IL i f'U,! II " ~ Field observations con finn Yes ,~ I rna ed e? - Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, >Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descriQtion) , ~ -.. - f1t".f.v\ ~ I CI>il1~f' )', L--- 1 Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles , __ Mg or Fe Concretions _. _'_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils _. __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ~J __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) I I I I I I I I !r"J (..\r.vC)~,,-",,,,J\ ~ttleS \",J\: t: IA~ k..,J...·<L--50" l s I I Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hydrology present? no RationalelRemarks: '------"" ~) Do\-{~ \\ s ' ~!l 1i,ve..t... CJ :t€(:; fI\ NOTES: ( YJI:. ~\-\ ( ~. 8 Is the sampling point within a wetland? (}V1A. '\ \ lie-v lfo-l ~ L,J"~k '.-'1 ,. no Lve-'i~>1A. I I I I I Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I t ·f ~' " I I I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: 'If' bfP8 k . I "') , Appl icant/owner: DA T A FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manua!l [)Lv-. :+ c.-- ' . - Date: r tlt/fJ,/, County: ~,'~ State: vk: Investigator(s): MA, P/f SlTfR: .~ _L7..~~ 'l.ile Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? q,p no Community fD: ,p ~ S Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ams' Transect ID: C-, Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~ Plot ID: 'B B ' \ ArC c..-l} Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator /tv hk<' til ow. VI', '" (..(1\" S bf) I~v /' P I)v.;",l",~ hAI~o.V>\Je(A ,-50 ~f '/ ~fl1v.( /)eV',Le"t :) ~D I~c.t.v' ~V1)~V; S V1fI.I1J't"'11-~,\ l.-r--IS ~u./ S -,,"I Y ~; tC.kll}', ~ '~ 1 £'~U/ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 6b Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database ~ Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature --..,-, Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? (J;Y' no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: HYDROLOGY el .- Is it the growing season? ® no Water Marks: yes (00/ Sediment Deposits: yes {n6 on ,.-...- Based on: soil temp (record tem(:1 ) Drift Lines: yes [.no'" Drainage Patterns: ye(',I1j») V' other (explain) (0 t' ,,-I... vi, ""'(...~ ~ k:J L. Dept. of inundation: ~inches Oxidized Root (live rO~l Local Soil Survey: yes /11'"0" , & inches Channels < 12 in. yes .. Il / .. - Depth to free water in pit: FAC Neutral: yes't!!> Water-stained Leaves ye(l)o' Depth to saturated soil: ..21!-,inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes (3v Rationale for decisiOn/Remarks: N, ~;~ .... 5 r/( , ";if e-l-'\ r \r J ~\i) Illl) I ~ f SOILS -( \Plo-+ Br:b-. I A ... Map Unit Name l'u r4.d.'f £rlt<' SA.r-~ lo~ (Series & Phase) Drainage Class \N(l...fl J I):Y ~d2. Fi~ld observations confim1 . Yes Taxonom rna ed e? ~ Profile Description Depth . Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descnI1tion) O-~ ~ to 't ( ~/]" .--....... s'" L- -q \ 1)+-4'7 2-.) 1 )/<. -. G .~"L .... Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) , --Histosol ~ Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes 00 Rationale for decisionlRemarks: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~/) yes .. no ~ Hydric soils present? yes r.B Is the sampling point yes Wetland hydrology present? yes no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: fl 01" Ao(!j~, .~{:, H\.,\ +'h ~ €-e... Cy·.tei,d\. c, 11\ } : .> i-l ve -b/e 110-t .r..) ;+~:.11 ... W~. -it Il" 1\ NOTES: L-o cvA-e.-A... '@;.(ASr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Revised 4/97 I -= I I DA T A F0Rl\11 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or '1~~ __ ~ __ ~'~" ____________ ~_'~1~98~7~C~o~rp~:s~w~e~tJ~a~n~d~D~e~1~in_e_an_'o_n_M~a~n~u_al~)~ ____ ~~r-__________ ~~ Project/Site: ·S/{~c....· -Date: II/t'-/oy Applicant/owner: County: k:.tl"lrj State: """"~ I I Investigator(s): P. To.;~r JMl .• iA..,j/~ SIT IR: 1. r. '"j' 2. 'HV ra. q ~ I Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Is the area a potential Problem Area? .. Explanation of atypical or problem area: yes yes Community 10: vp tAf,..et Transect 10: LC./.I ~~-;.) Plot ID: ). S ;;) VEGET A TJON (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Hydrophytic vegetation present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? yes Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover JJL no I . Physiological/reproductive adaptations Wetland plant database. Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other (explain) yes Sediment Deposits: Drainage Patterns: Indicator yes ~ yes ~ Local Soil Survey: "'" I Based on: ----soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes r® ~ ____ ~~~~~==~o~th~er~(~le~xp~ll~al~'nL-)~la~c~~~t~G~\~~~~~~~~~~~~~-+'~~~~ __ ~ ________ ~~~~~ _________ ~ Dept. of inundation: ~ inches Oxidized Root (live roots) yes I Channels <12 in. yes 1$ Depth to free water in pit: ~ inches FAC Neutral: yes n6 Water-stained Leaves yes r& Depth to saturated soil: 11L inches I Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage data: __ Aerial photographs: Wetland hydrology present? I Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ,J 'v rr ,' ...... ~ I e..eUQfJ VI ......... (... yes I Other: @ I'''rd,.~ lo~( Other (explain): T~' ( ,"--. '. SOILS Map Unit Name Puyt.I!'1' f./l e 7~ lo~ (Series & Phase) . Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) ~-I..' AI 'O~lZ.1/3 - ~ -Ita"'" Al tD\(;' ~.rl?' - Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? yes .. e> Rationale for decisionlRemarks: /oJ 0 r....'(c:C{' I <-$"<1:( . .'~, c.a...tor-s, Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes ~ Hydric soils present? yes Wetland hydrology present? yes @ RationalelRemarks: NOTES: ,-,p(c..",..i2-, "'- ... o+-~s-u I Drainage Class. /ue.l{ iot'n.~ @I Field observations confim1 Yes Mottle abundance . Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descri[;1tion) -j~~ -v,SL. --Matrix chroma :5 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) r~~ €V Is the sampling point yes within a wetland? Revised 4/97 I I I ·1 'I I I I I ·1 I I I I I I I I I I .Do Normal Circilmstanc~s exist on the site? ®/ no Community ill: ror~~ \.Je.h"\."~ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes (nJ2.., Transect ID: (C·',)·' . .Is the are'll a potential Problem Area? yes §~>. . ... Plot ID: ?\ o-r~ Explanation of atypical or' problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T := tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum ·1 ~v.\I} ... r, .'1\'"'~f;\\AL'J'') . 5 r' r), ,', ;" I" U,-;.,; ,1",:,jVI4 y 5 ~I--"'-:.:/";"'O'-· ,"';'~'-''';-'l-'-Qr-'-,-'-'-(-:-pJA..-'-.---'-..... " -I--.S-· --+---r-:-:"'---I;,...;....j-~-~-+-'---il-~--I---'----+-'-==~ I '7.11/10.\) LI'J.OtCof" -("' " r-~~~~~~~~~i~----~-:-------1--------+-~~~~~-------+-------+------~r-----~ I 1~~~lO~~15 ____ ~~~_'~ __ ~~ ______ --+ __ ~ __ ~~ 'OCIIN "'IfltllAvin ----. I. HYDRO'1)HYTIC VEGET A nON IND~~A ~~:S: ; % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC -t.L~ ., "'~: 0 I I I Ii Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation ____ Wetlimd plant database' . Morphological adaptations ~'v"""~stJ ~P~I','vrPersonal knowledge of regional plant communities Technical Literature . . X . Other (explain) . . " Hydrophytic vegetation present! ~) no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: C .-'j .• )/OM, .... V\L·t c*-~y~(DPt-\( j'e (j~et;~t,W\ Bvttl'e:0t.eJ2l-'l>a~; HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? no I Based on: ___ soil temp (record temp ). ~ __ ~~==~,«=.==~o~th~e~r~(je~x~pll~ai~n)~I~o~~I~G~~I.~~~~t.~~~~~'~~~~~'+-________________ ~ ______________ ~-4 Dept. of inundation: ~ inches I Depth to free water in pit: lJJL inches Depth to saturated soil: ~ inches I Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage data: __ Aerial photographs: Other: II ,', SOILS Map' U~itName tyoJ?'nJ"I~. Sj it 10l.-v-- (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description -----:> ..:., ... --=..;::..;..--..;;;:::; Drainage, Class Poor-{y O~nul (I'el!.. Field observations confirm ~'NO e? I Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil I I, I I I I I I (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) Q-1 k .,',' . to ~R. '~/"3 --~ ~' .. ~-\~-\ j \01 ( ~h \ 0 ~ ( ~b , , , Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ' --'--Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ ' Aquic Moisture Regime _, __ ' Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? 6JjJ , , no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: tOv) l..~Vf>A." " .... J, ~'ffk( ~~, v Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic v~getation present? 6i2 no Hydric soils present? ~ no I , Wetland hydrolo,gy present? no RationalelRemarks: ~ 411 +~ve-e. c:vde..,( :" 0. If!.. ~"t. PI~T NOTES: ~$ size & contrast structure, etc. profile '(match descriRtion) :S~L ~ I ~ .. ",,-5iL Y\t)A~ ~ -t-~hP"i'~ ~ Matrix chroma::;; 2 with ~ottles __ " _ Mg or Fe Concretions' _. _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Org~nic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationaVLocal Hydric Soils List Other (e~lain in remarks) ,,;kW; 'lJJr\ /-. ' Is the sampling point c:Y no within a wetland? 'I) v ; t\--, "'A ,. V t.+\,IV\.\.' I I I I N vJ fA> f~'V .f t-k... Itll1l I Revised 4/97 I I I Project/Site: S1'/"I~ broll Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Wetland Delineation no 6'a (@ % cover Indicator Dominant Plant "n .. ", .. c HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 7/3~ /001, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Date: II County: ('-'I ~ State: Vv'A S/TIR: ~c: Community Ill: 0,/ Transect ID: c.:..- Plot ID: ~ 5 LIJ.-.<.-ilCWIJ ~..., I) Stratum % cover Indicator Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations Wetland plant database Technical Literature Hydrophytic vegetation present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: vi ~.t..1a.;h'('.""" ,"'" ~ HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? 1./ Dept. of inundation: Depth to free water in pit: to saturated soil: Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage data: Aerial Wetland hydrology present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: no no inches inches Other: "'"'1 cR.,.. c.,.. r( ~ c-o 0-0-f\A I,h'J. Jlf 7 Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other Water Marks: yes Sediment Deposits: yes Drainage Patterns: yes Local Soil Survey: yes Water-stained Leaves yes SOILS Map Unit Name Pvy(),/luF £~ f;,M1~1 I~",,~' (Series & Phase) ~.......;=---..,;(_/ 2;, S Drainage Class ~JI J /'rAJ n J .{'fv~iv \ox€rcJlIs Field observations confirm Yes No e? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descriQtion) ,,--5 ,(1 l (5 ~'?-7-/ 'Z---' ... l ~cMVl.. 7 " A 7.., Z'':;'1 f.{ (z. 7.t;'1~ '-IN ~~~l ~"ttttf.., ! I' 1-/1.{ i6tJ-"'"1 ;)-I B-r II.. '.A.:r. . Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol --IL...-Matrix chroma::;; 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: 6"1 LrJI/c.. $01/>. (...0 ...... ~rGINI.A-vV).~ -t1'1')C /).J Nt", f'~o;t ..,GedvNS ,'c. I' .,.1 J ,Ie.·d vu Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point CJjf no Wetland hydrology present? no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: PL-U -t{.."'1IU.. c-r.'te."....I/~ ~ 1M t.Jtl ' ~ s~r/~ loc:::.-~.:tl'Q n. j Ie; Wlkttt-, ;'/. tv w e,.-t {CVvI J. . NOTES: \jJ$T U..JS + o-f' f1 ~ '57. I I' 'I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project/Site: 5/ y(~'n Vltll/c-. Applicant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (W A State Wetland Delineation Manua] or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) UYviIc.. Date: If) /11-/'i County: IL., h '( r.\~~ AI lJ .. --.L... LA. ,~j' ~' J.I 0 tI ~ w""1 State: v'V It ',l./, Investigator( s): SITIR: "2.15 ,-r z..~ jI.J 12. ' It Do Normal Circumstan~es ex~st on the site? " , <:yeP no Community Ib: 'Pe~ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes <!Y9) Transect 10: (c.--z..) Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Explanation of atypical or problem area: , ~ Plot 10: f/If I/. / , VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator· Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Flul ((.,/. ~ (\. r, ,,,,i: vI(1.(..ilc 1+-[ !(lO, fa.,,,,tJ j -t ~O. ~c.u.)r Gt\-f i~ )u L:£',,- C('j~IIl\J~ ~e.r,c~ S /0 rfer.,eu./ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC -z,1t~ 1())1:, .,. Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations -1L areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations -;r Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? CE9 no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: VC'j~IO~tCt -,C.~ "'~rl'-C..-. f(C1i 's J'o~,~, ~oZJL -bL (1 .... fQ~0rt'1i'/ .:,;.-' ~4/J. HYDROLOGY I • Is it the growing season? 09 no Water Marks: yes ~ Sediment Deposits: yes <tiQ) on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes 'I:lI0 Drainage Patterns: yes GW v other (explain) (.oC,.tV1 c...L,.....,~ dd!-. Dept. of inundation: ---2-inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes~ Channels < 12 in~ no Depth to free water in pit: ~inches F AC Neutral: (!:j po Water-stained Leaves ye~ Depth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below:' Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: -_. I\erial pllotograplls: Other: Wetland hydrology present? @ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: I "v-C r.zt. Oy. "l "ze[ ) I",t-.a..· "'W r ' 1'Go/l uf T~ -7" // p"'o -('It! t--" e,... 1.:11. :"";00' ;.-r;;(,wir t.€.~ -t .cr I, I.A ..... dJ ( I ..... c{ rb lot: ... \ ? SOILS. Map Unit Name lMcu¥l'~".I(lre< ~I H= I..-"IN"- (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 0-j(~r A /a y Rtf).. 7·S yrz. 3/y Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol --__ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? ~ no Drainage Class Poo ,.l, J7J).; ~X Field observations confirm G No e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descrigtion) IY1 0 I fl\{ J.A OVM, r~ ~'Ib -P-t1~ / Matrix chroma::;; 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ,.40/(. -t:!a_~rvt ~s a.. t e,... • ~ i Uf.,~ I )I(.....-ft {.,o t'-" c,J ..... r-o""""A/ ~:I? IIVI'-r~ (,.... .,6!-,.... I.e:, ~;( . Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? Is the sampling point _7 no Q:'~, no Wetland hydrology present? c~ no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: -Tl., ... "'~ Cn-hl!....r le.-V I"€r.~'v~ . -'l" ';7c<-~r/~ f~<:::.I'C.::ti'ovt .. J ~ ........ ··ltA.J ~\. (c.. I L """-'L I~"" cL tV,tt( evv-P - NOTES: I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I Revised 4/97 I I I I, I I I I I I, I I II I, I I, I I I Project/Site: Sf r' h k I .... ) r, ~ Appl icant/owner: DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (W A State Wetland DeJjneation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) 1111'\ '1+ C-Date: It!) (01 CountY: t.Cft1- State: \-vi Inve~ligat6r(s): fV\. f1 . P,l SITIR: ~'5. T 2.. ~ K) 1'.\1-t==- Do Nornal Circumstances exist'on the site? ~ no Community ID: 1'..f" ' Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes E Transect ID: ('.C!.'-iij., Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot 10: vJ 1. S Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator S"'.-'lb"'t Vll (l'Ilt.~~5r· 7 2-D, -fa..w ~1.\:tJL~ ~ S, ~O ft:U--v f7\{V'.·-L V1~61C. '" ~ , lJ)JV\\tI.i ~e.V'\ce" '-jE=" 5 30 l.fcu.-\.V ? D ''''\V. ~ I + \"\S'M;tQ.(o.. \" ~O ta.c/ ~ oJ.?< . ~ ~ C D ... \ ~,/, "''' " T' 2s ~ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % ofdomina~ts OBL, FACW, & FAC '3/~.., C;00o Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations 7 areas of prolonged inundationlsal1ltation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature -LL... Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? C!Y no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? (!Y no Water Marks: yes & Sediment Deposits: yes (~) on Based on: soil' temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes () Drainage Patterns: yes@ 1/ other (explain) (oQU c/ , ...... cst!, d..ctG.. Dept. of inundation: -==-inches Oxidized Root (live roo~ Local Soil Survey: yesa Channels < 12 in. yes . Depth to free water in pit: 2J:Binches FAC Neutral: yes~ Water-stained Leaves yes@ Depth to saturated soil: ~inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: _.----...Other: Wetland hydrology present? (5J no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~) ~V\ .... 'L.J.-l, • Sf ,J Oh ~~~t~f!~ -It· t Je I){-\";\ ~o V' ~.() 1M' .... ., Y\ , t---t'v' J-" l·, -I (.\ i' L-)0 ~\ " ~ J SOILS Map Unit Name wo.Jjovl'l~ 51,' It {o;M4A (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) o-~ 4 10 ~ ( ~/1., '-"~ ~-R~ ,~ ID J{ i/& lD~{ ~/4 Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol --__ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor ' --__ Aquic Moisture Regime _'_ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (= 1) matrix Hydric soils present? ~(J;iY, no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ~ ( 10 o~ \ V'\ .... Drainage Cla~s POo~ J.~ntd2 .. Field observations confim1 , (!!jJ No e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. , profile (match descriQtion) -5", L __ ~.r. f;I(~ i .... ", I {p ... ",,,,,,, S; L. ~ Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) "1"L-~ k-o", " 7..{) "" ... + ... r~V\ ,,~ ''l ~..,~Lt~ LQ.J (.,~voVV\~ " C)', \ ') vV~~ pre.~"'C.e. f?{ IMIvtrl~ ,) Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no c9 Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydrology present? (yes/ no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: '--"" S~""'i' I e., flat ./\ \\ s ' J\ r~v~e LV: rt "..0-o V1 J-. IS -r--k • { fD / c2. v" ,l,,'. "\ ?< .Ja.+(~--\ I I I I I I' I I I I I I NOTES: +1,) \q vJ ~(l)c:'\hJ..-~~ (01 ~( i9,f f (~fU , 11 hd vi /2A.. V'\ A~ ol J ',1L J-.I 11'\ 0"'i/-~ \Jl.'~ ~ f': V\ \C.. fl"j Revised 4/97 I I I Project/Site: ::p~' nyJ;:JrO[J,t- Applicant/owner: DATA FORM ,1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Det~rmination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation ManuaD_ ~C Date: Ir~:I./;1 County: /~(J I" I I I Investigator(s): P To~ I -1VI.. (3!n~f:.~ I 13, !loa /JWC4y- State: /IVA-rz.,/c srrlR: Z; "-Z"3IV Do Normal Circumstancfis exist on the site? @.D no v Community ID: ",' tJ,tMt:/ JI/. Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes enD Transect ID: c-(. v1'l......Q... 11>1.",J2... , Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~ Plot ID: PI ):f-. ./f / I I I I I I I I I I I I, I' I I Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T =,tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator C;:" *" r ('(..1 1.1 ':~'\t l.'V1 f\ 60 r;e.. 5 50 FAC() 'l, -.J ,)k 1-1 /0 FACU t5~. "..f''d I oe;..'c:/{ .... "".; ,.tt.f" .. I '" tt.~ ~u~· tJ.~,o.M ~",~.Jr 5 7rar~ .(t\G,U A~;,,.-rtj S , H -FAe OS p~ '. j raCe .., I " Loli um 5ff' H 7r acc ';"c.v Ii<td.. * If 1O, +AC.I).) Ctui 1.1.1'11 j Ytt5~ HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC~"? 1110 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database --Morphological adaptations .. Personal knowledge of regional plant communities, ./" --Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes ® Rationale for decisionlReinarks: ~r vfr.~ 7'F°t14 \ \J~~\"~~ . ~ -t.pbL ,~ ,.6 ..... ·.""· HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ® 'no Water Marks: yes c§ft Sediment Deposits: yes eJ on Based on: soil temp (record temp ).~ Drift Lines: yes r!5Y Drainage Patterns: yes ~ ......... other (explain) loo.l CJ., 'Vla.·\'-£'- Dept. of inundation: -O-inches Oxidized Root (live roo~ Local Soil Survey: yes f3J Channels < 12 in. yes. :G Depth to free water in pit: ~inches FAC Neutral: yes & Water-stained Leaves yes&, Depth to saturated soil: 2..JJi inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes @ Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ,.c...<::-r/ ~. t'-yt ro , 0:'; 7 ' ~o .•.. ,r. I r ",-to r ~ (J-{ SOILS Map Unit Name Wo<J.i r\V ill~ S.'lj \""'+1 (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) o -/{p.f A-/OyP.t/j2 /0 yl? 'I-/~ " . Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ , Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor --__ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? ® no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: L.o....... ~~~ r"'6"VV1 ~ £'0" ( .....,tt--tr. .. c~ c,...., .. ~ 1, ... ;y12", ~ ~ ,'IC, - Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes @ Hydric soils present? no Drainage Class Poo,.17 Drzu"",J Field observations confinn Yes rna ed e? No Mottle abundance' Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descril2tion) many, fine; silht l~tU"t. ' .dis IiI1 cf ./ Matrix chroma::; 2 with mottles -- __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks), I'Q£2.o )L ~,I< .. :t.)ce-~ tJ.,.rl2... I~,.~I~ 0-( Is the sampling point yes ® @; Wetland hydrology present? yes (!10") within a wetland? - RationalelRemarks: p r-<€.~c"ci: I II e.IfJ.dtd l I) Y1 P-..-J2 t..yR~IOJ7 O\...-#t...Q""~ '~r-IC/ ~o ,', '!:. 't>-<-t,--,.c.--t(~ ~ rca..-, tt.-l,.:..~ . -rL...a..... ~ec.+v\rl.t2--(OClt~t-, 0 ,t IS v-r~£' NOTES: Revised 4/97 I I I' I, I I, I I I I I I, I I I .. DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination I, r=-~-=~ ________ ~ __ ~ __ ~ __ 0N~~A~S~t~a~te~W~e~t~la~n~d~D~e~li~ne~a~t~io~n~M~a~n~u~al~o~r~~ ____ ~ __ ~,-____________ ~ . 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: 'Sp r', "J hY-NIP K If\ YI ; t-·C Date: l \ I') /0 1 .~ r , Applicant/owner: County: \<~ ') A (\)...-r-State: I.) fr Investigator(s): fVl. " "', \ . _____ S/TIR: ')..."1 J -rz.?;1J ) {Uf f! Do Normal Circumstances eXIst on the site? Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? Is the area a potential Problem Area? Explanation of atyjJical or problem area: (yes../ ~ Community 10: . ~ . ~ C'!ll!/ Transect 10: L. -S . yes B Plot 10: .t.t. vJ ((!.,-3) VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator -(1).( V\V-';. ~V:r.ev--~ <-to 'J,,;i.M. ~~'> (/I {"..uri 0\'--'" l, .2 ~o ~J S.J0< <; ',i,-~ V>~: S <' ~ ~v.; r ~ ~.O--'r.\"'} Lls.; .. ~k~ ,-"2-') I'I---I--I--l---I----t--t--l--l I 1\ 'I ! I I I- I I I I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC ,-:; Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Hydrophytic vegetation present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? (!;Y no no PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations Wetland plant database Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other(explain) Water Marks: on Drif1 Lines: Sediment Deposits: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes /.~d Based on: ----r soil temp (record temp ) 1/ other (explain) 10 t.1l-\.. l"..,lJl"'.t.t~ Jia%.. yes elD Dept. of inundation: ~ inches Depth to free water in pit: ~ inches Depth to saturated soil: ~ inches Check all that apply & explain below: Stream, Lake or gage data: ~ Aerial photographs: -= Other: Oxidized Root (live roots) Channels < 12 in. yes (j19) F AC Neutral: (!;y -no / Other (explain): Water-stained Leaves ye~ "cAL 'I"' i\ I ........ · . \ .-\ h1,((,L "fl" -·r ML0 r""'" (""", ... \~.,,'i <;. .... \1 Wetland hydrology present? '. /YeS) ,no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~ \\.yJ'IOf\\fl:L Je.y.-\,,\.u,,", C1~A. ~i~,i'l. ),;'\') I SOILS Map Unit Name Pvyti ILf £y..v ~~ (M-m (Series & Phase) -3 J 7/0+ 4- Drainage Cl~ss w<.:ll ll"tu~'" £ Field observations confim1 Yes Taxonom ~ e? Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Ora,wing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc, profile moist) moist) (match descriQtion) O--~ {\-lD'1 ~ )11.------G~ L ~_~t-!~1 to, ( itL [D Y' ~ I~ F,~ 'W VV'o/I-tD'1 . J (;(L I Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) $. Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? :;~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks " yVt1t\1~5 ', ... J:,u,,-\e. k,d\V~L 50"/ tot,.! cttvo/¥/v-, 50;\s tJ~\-l, yves.eV] L.IZ..... Wetland Determination (circle) , Hydrop~ytic vegetation' present? g;; no ~ Hydric soils present? tfji) no Is the sampling point no Wetland hydrology present? t?e'D no within a wetland? Ra tion alelRemarks: f) dr·:, f;\ \ 5 t\\j 1-h'-d2-Cv·.+ f v','\. "",,,,,). : ) -/-( ~v ~ kv'e w:t-~', ... A... l-J e -1(" Vl e\. NOTES: L Dt.-I {.\ ./Y tv f~ tJe,+ oj ./IJ 5:' I I' I I I, I I' I I I' I I I I Revised 4/97 I I I DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination I Project/Site: 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) 5'Fr,"""5 -brotf~ Q;~ I Vt'I..,' t" C-Oate: ,,(~ (r.« (W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or I Applicant/owner: County: 1c...1~ State: ..,vA lnvestigator(s): 'f'. Toc...ltu-1M A 1oifcf2. \1\ S/TIR: -u5JTZ,~~ ~'1~ ,I Do Normal Circumstanc~ exist' on the site? f19' no Community ID: v-pltJI-VJ.e:€. , Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ~ Transect 10: c.. -3 . Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: v.; 04" TltvY~ C!-1 Explanation of atypical or problem area: P'16~ ~-v I VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator I 5cLV'lC.. '\I'--rd, "''''4/ c:.,. * 5 '"t.o fa.c.c,a.) I -e. .1 ..... ,"-~'Oj 1 .. ( s+ <> ~r-f~J Ir ..o"'II\..I.!. ~o_! ""0.. ~ S ~r ,-,,~ I + \0\-.{:'er.,..c,... Il'/w.-!ru l'\ \ aNI rO .n \ tdz,. yo IJ I I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC ~(~:. 7("/~ I Check al1 indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations I areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database -L Morpbological adaptations V-Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (explain) 'I Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: J 0 "'-I' VlIV1efJ II. ·rJ..rTt1-r/L, V~~t:t.,-ho", .''''-~ ~~r(oQ. I oc..cc;t, 0 ~ I 'c;, /-;1 ~Cit.-I.?;/ I HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? (jj1 no Water Marks: yes & Sediment Deposits: yes ~ on I Based on: ( soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes t!!Y"' Drainage Patterns: yes @, J other (explain) le,~ c-ll """.:h: ... & cb. Dept. of inundation: -==-inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes ~ I Channels < 12 in. yes iI6 Depth to free water in pit: 2l1iinches F AC Neutral: yes @ Water-stained Leaves yes ~ Depth to saturated soil: .:::2...L.B.. inches I Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: I Wetland hydrology present? yes ® Rationale for decisionlRemarks: !U~ i "'~ .. GA.-IOr-S. d'"{ 1V.e:t-I.~. /;v" f J'I,:. I 0 ~ '1 I { VI SOILS .... 3} D+~-U I, Drainage Class ...;:;Md ___ ;.ul-,i.~c .... '" ..... ' t1 .... J2""""'~ __ Map Unit Name Pv~a Iluf' -f:1Yk S4,~ (O~ (Series & Phase) Proftle Description Field observations confinn Yes Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moist) moist) (match descrigtion) O-I~ A 10 Y'1f.'-'!t, --6rSt- Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) __ Histosol --Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _. __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other Jexplain in remarksl Hydric soils present? yes @ Rationale for deciSiOn/Remar~: , Ivo ~ ...... ..Q..' ·c.a...'t'"c:u-· S , ~ J.r. c.. 'h 0','( os· Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Q Hydric soils present? yes dW' Is the sampling point yes Wetland hydrology present? yes rIO) within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: ~r"'~J t(...,J) I~ro I oJ! /~/udol lA.. \ -H"..Q V-clA... 'Vo(.;tt~ -pt~s w~ 't£evvle9 ~al'{S t>-f"e.,. tt)t..~~,. ~. s~-r11/2.-1't:Jc.,~'OV"\.. {~ 1\ ,i lV/-ri,.'1'\.. ~ IV o€,-rl WVIf . I NOTES: I I I, ,I I I, Revised 4197 I I I. Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ,~ JJt,:'§,:',:,~:':.' Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes <....J:l1V: Is tbe area a potentjal'Problem Nea? ' yes ~> Community 10: P5S Transect 10: LvI... D-/ PloLTD: P/Pf rt; /. Explanation of atypical or probiem area: ,.-,.:.:. Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover G~IiJ'-111(;,11&-t".,r-: '(. T /5 /4...." 14~,,f ... G. ~~)e IU(..I,iJc.-\,1<:1.. .. , i 5. 'fO .. I tlw ~ /tLM,f rfA, '* /5. ' I I S, G..o"",wS 5 t/l.,., C-trl'o... 'I,pl"t-. 1 .... -tifC,IJ~ 1-1 10. Pb..A-Ip.."f. X If. Cfo. A..rW.JiV1()..~ I. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATIONlNDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 'i /4 :;:. lOOp I II Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Hydrophytic vegetation present? Rationale for decisionlRemarks: (§),. no V e.erv~-tl 0"'-I 'E> J o""",l fII.&d ell HYDROLOGY Stratum PhysiologicaUreproductive adaptations Wetland plant database 5 % cover Personal knowledge of regional plant communities Other (explain) .• " j Indicator I I Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: on yes ® -<" Sediment Deposits: yes enD I Based on: --r--soil temp (record temp ) ~ __ ~~~k1==~o~th~er~(e~x~p:l~ai~n}~i~,oa~x~~~~wLI~~~~dl+~~,~~ll~~'~~ __ ~~ ____________ ~ __ ~~ __________ ~ I,' Dept. of inundation: J-!nches Oiidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes c® Drift Lines: yes ® Channels <12 in~ no Depth to free water in pit: ~ inches FA ... C .. :'l'-!e~tral: fYesJ no Water-stained Leaves yes Cii!b Depth to saturated soil: ?.l..t-inches V I", Check all that apply & explain below: OtlW (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: __ " , . Aerial photographs: I Wetland hydrology present? , Rationale for decisionlRemarks: I Other: .. no .:: II~J cA,-t",·V'f..,. Ji .. ()..J'l.:r{~ fN7i..HJ 10j 1 . ~t ~ :~ ... ; . '.~ '~I.: 0;:,'" ~,;'" . :: .. ;,.: vJttlarJd b-I , . 10+ #-1-1, ~;" .. ;>E:Dr~inage Class pooA~ J~~eJ SOILS Map Unit Name PV1a (/vf $/ ltv c1~ lo~ (Series & J.:>hase) it ..... :.:L . ;(~{,~ :.: :':::: Field observations confirn1 . Y.es No ts 'S<>:::~··:;' rna ed e? ;:: .... ;:::.:: . Profile Description ·;~~·.'i· ': "" ., ... ::::~.:.;:~:' . Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abu!1d:~nce ':., ..... ~. ' Texture, concretions, ~rawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & con~i~~:t: structure, et~, profile .J mOist) moist) ". (match descriQtion) '.: .. '., . .. . . O-Lj. O~ani' -::':;",:.':..:. ---",':' :r····· Lf-((gi: A-ID 12.5/2. /6 yR 5/0 cc,fY7mon;<lrne, Silly ~/ay 104m f Icrfs of· roof 'hQ$'S' dishhd, .. :~ . :X~ . :,,', . Hydric Soil Indicators:. (check-all that apply) . ' .... ,/':~:~trix chroma ~ 2 with mottles --Histosol __ Histic Epipedon __ Mg orFe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime . __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ . Reducing Conditions __ : _ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List __ " Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? C§.> no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: <...0 V--' c::-l roo """-0..-~Q lv\o1tl,~ 1Me..e:t -tk t....~,..c-15cr ," er,l-fIZ-(-/" K • Wetland Determination (circle) . .. Hydrophytic vegetation present? @b no Hydric soils present? ~ no Is the sampling point @ no Wetland hydrology present? ~ no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: ". ..... ~ ~ ,J.( 3 wd-,f~,/ ~u'cJ~. I'i-c---6~1''' {-11 ,,4. ~n.. " /-V/Tklh (,I,.;- t.,v.Jl~ . '" " " " NOTES: ",:' . :;: . Revised 4/97 :.;::: I I 'I I I 'I I I ,I I' 'I ,I' 'I 'I I I' I I I , ! I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ) Project/Site: ' S);r i,!)prtJu/: -Unil- Applicant/owner: DATA FORM l~tReviS'ed) Routine Wetland D~terJllination (WA State Wetland Delil~atioii:'Manual or , ., "~ 1987 Corps Wetland Delhle'itt;i6n,Manual) t> I( ' ' '~~~,::-:;;:,:,: Date: 10/':<,/ o'/- County: /() n; State: WA-, Investigator(s): &, 1h>//tJU/~ I /VI, 13'~~kel/ l~l'Y)p :·~~::~i: .~'.; ',' SIT IR: '1"" t; Tl..'";l,.AJ 1t..."e. Do Nonnal Circumstances exist on the site? ,qe5:) n~:)i<' ' Community JD: Pl:'~":' I/.~ , i Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ~" Transect JD: D -I _ Is the area a potentYtI Problem Area? yes ®::, Plot JD: I/(;f 1J:.J.. " Explanation of atypicai or probfem area: ' : '," .. .... VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T ::: tree; S = shrub; H = herb".':y:\~-,vine) ....... Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator DO~inant Plant Sp-ecies Stratum % cover Indicator ~1!l1()mllY7 ". 'rIrrfl Ii yqr~ pJFIlT1 ,75 OBi.. -"I:--r'l'~ {tL~ .. fol/o-. lI-/0, ()BL ~rcf(!IH -* II. 16 ftt-c IV f cerhl4 a. <~ :" ;.: -13CL.rf!. qr6{And 1/ ',>::, ' /0 ' ..... J .... .. ,,' ,>, , ' HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 3 (-; :::100'70 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in ./ PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations --::;7 areas of prolonged inundation/saturation Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Personal knowledge of regional plant communities v_ ----,- Technical Literature. Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~' no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ;"0 wy,'wdaQ b( V ~ clct---H (} ""-' ""'-t~ C;~r(1C2,/ l.., c,p.::t I CI n.. \ 'Ci, "-yJ"'M-tI~ sreallVi• HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? C§ no Water Marks: yes no _-"Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes ,no Drainage Patterns: (29 "no·, v other (explain) loc,J rL 1MILt~J!..du " Dept. of inundation: -fL-inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <l2 in"--6'?:l no Depth to free water in pit: -Zi$. inches F A¢,Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Depth to satmated soil: ~inches ,,' Check all that apply & explain below: Ot~er (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: ' --" ;.' Aerial photographs: Other: ' , .. Wetland hydrology present? C§ no . ' .:' . Rationale for decisionlRemarks: .. , "': O'fl'J:~ pof)ded arr.a./ ~rCf'Slof") w/'l ~~J: Sa.nl~ f!Pl-p r-e...J~ 'C-"Pqter r\.5 ~ r-L"{'"7A -iA.""'.rf?~ ~ ... .rJ / VI Jr, 'w .:.+ 'U.J jf.;;1, An Jo.,l,..~J ", -= I , 7Jr, f (I{ - SOILS Map Unit Name PVSd .... , Ii 1 c)~ lea..."",- (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell ~ moist) moist) 0-1 OrJanic -- '-I-~/8 /I /OYRS/::J. ){) yR y./(p, Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) _' __ Histosol __ Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ ' Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for decisiol)lRemarks: ~~i{!;}~',' Mottle abundiince Texture, concretions, ~rawing of soil size & contf~:~t;,' structure, etc:' profile • ';",,;.!::':" (match description) . ,'.',. ':,: ... , ," -----.: ... \:..::: ... :~., .. , .~:;. :::' me:l n.J I Irieti,utn I - 'sj I~ cloy /dtl'h elishhd, ',::/: .. ": . ;: :~.:. : '~'~., ~ . : :~; . ....... , ~;~~trix chroma::; 2 with mottles _'_" '_ Mg or Fe Concretions __ ' _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ ,',_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ L'isted on NationaVLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remark~ L -v..,J c..\,... ... o"""'c...-bo" t.s vv,".'-.... ~"'''-'-CJ1't....I'--tQA..-tvr.e..& ~ IJ: c.-.:d·v~ of I'jJlrl'V ~ds' Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Hydric soils present? (§3 no Wetland hydrology present? (feb no RationaielRemarks: ~ I<kI 3 ~~d ~?Ui!'-~, ~'V(..-t(~1 NOTES: Is the sampling point within a wetland? ~ " "", : ',' " .~ .. ' . ',';.' t;'~r(1JL @) no -... ~~ /'0 ",.vbI' 0 ~ /c;. ~1'14/11... "'-- Revised 4/97 I, I: I I, '. I' I I II I, I, II· 'I' I I' I I' I, I I I I I I I I I I I ., I ,I I I I I I' I I DATA FORM ~f(Revised) 1987 Corps Wetland 'De ~ca,tion Manual) Routine Wetland ~te"'Iu~~~tion ' (W A State Wetland Dclifi~ati~~;:Manual or tl'" : ,,' Project/Site:' Sfri~.Jbr()~'k ,-VIIiI-0 l:<:;~;/'}, Date: IO!s;;u/of , Appl icant/owner: 1!'5~'; County: ~y t-b//~w~, m. .<30(, k Gn k Cl.ry> State: W,A. Investigator(s): B. SITIR: !IE TZ.~.v ft'it!?" Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ ~~::".,:, Community ID: "P.f"o , . Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: C~I.,.", Is tbe area a potential"Problem Area? ' yes (li~f': Plot,ID: ,PM -/I. ;3. Explanation of atypical or problem area: : ... / ': &.v~-'CI. tI. ..p -g)-\ ',." , VEGETATION (For strata. indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = her\:iFY'''l'-vine) , .' ;~:. :', ': ;:~ , Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dorrtinant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator .:je-T C/o !=A-c. . P .. t"c;'~ \. J. {~"'l. c:,ort\.U'i. C. 4. r,' CAUt. ..4:-5. ~o: ~. ~AC. ' ;<. H 5"0, I'<cu7lA-r/W lIAr Y~S, rAc.w .. ':/',:;' , , ~ 1-/ 60 &\1\1 ··~:~C~~' .' P~",,/i:>.rl ~ c..ri.J.;.ilf1lt-ut:.. ,", .::.:: . . ,' P61..., 0;,1"', cJ". ....... Ui\,..Itti·h; ..... J-I. Irt:lre, Flfc U };:( A*-"'"1 ;, ......... ..(;f"><.Jf'.e"1IM..A.--II /race FA-c . HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION 'INDICATORS: ','. " % of dominants OBL. FACW. & FAC . LI/'-I ::. ! 0 0 70 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --7 areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations 7 Personal knowledge of regional plant communities ../ Technical Literature Other. (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~,~',' no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: vC1.j~:"-.' ...... ~ ~r{e...-p{~ 's J.o""",' ~~~~ '7 krJr\7yk0t'-~'cy. HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ,~ no W~ter Marks: J~ no. ~" , Sediment Deposits:, yes no on!' trees (..'IJ/bnwoocl) Based on: , soil 'temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes . no Drainage Patterns: yes no II' other (explain) lou-J CAl ~ai·e..-.P~ ~: . " Dept. of inundation: -¢-inches Ox'jclized'Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Ch~nnels < 12 in,eYeD no Depth to free water in pit: LIB-inches F AG-Nel-ltral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Depth to saturated soil: 1.L8-inches ,,' : Check all that apply & explain below: Otber (explain): Stream. Lake or gage data: " --", Aerial photographs: Other:_ : Wetland hydrology present? c§:> no ~;' .' . Rati.onale for decisionIRemarks: .• :: w~ .. ;t{~ ~f"010()7 LVa.;t~ ... I" ...... ev-I;:.. S ~ (9~r9..J-z..e~ ;V.,' "Z-:i <7 fl>.ene.f; ()... re-I J: e-a....-t .. ve-0( ··~t\· ' ~ ~ .. ~ , .":,' ~. -I ~!.-. ,c.· .. ::,·: ' ----=:::' ~< .. :·.t~t·Drainage Class poor=L d. mini?d SOILS Map Unit Name PuS,cd; 51 Itt Cd~ lo£l,/,VV (Series & Phase) ~ .. :" .. ~". 4 I:,';}~ Field Obse,:~ions confim, . .Yes @ Taxonom ProfiJe Description ;if:~~tjt< Oepth Horizon Matrix color Mot:tle colors Mottle abuhda'nce Texture, concretions; J?rawing of soil ... , .. ~~~ . (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contta'$l structure, et~. profile . . :. ~.: ','-,J moist) moist) .. ',' .. ~ ... (matc'h descriQtion) :"'~::', •... -. ,", .. () -/0 A loy'-3/4 -~j~{::;':~'~:c .. StU7cly loam. fa+-8 ICJ"jfl3/-:J. IOYR3/v HUlA) J I ' 14 .. h ~ I el,S /i,,'(J 5and!J /tJtUn . " , ' . <::..:' ::: :::Y:' :::',' Hydrk Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) /):~atrix chroma:::;; 2 with mottles --Histosol _ Histic Epipedon _\_. _ Mg o~ Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ . High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ ' _ Aquic Moisture Regime, __ ' _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ '_' Reducing Conditions __ : _' Listed'on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? c:§:> no Rationale for decisi<;>nlRemarks: (..0 ........ C!k.!"'''-6-e-J2.. fV\.Q -ttl ) ~ ,.J..'t;A;i:' rt "'-rJ.,./c-'Q,CJ .' IS '-A."" I ) 11.1_ Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? @) no Hydric soils present? eYE> no Is the sampling point @.' no Wetland hydrology present? ~ no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: ",.. .... , o...lI '3 <tr,''"te../''i c:-t:\..""e.... """ct· 1W.... '5~r~ I '" c:..:cb • 17 )'\ ,', ev~I~L tL. 1.Vt:;b 1"-'. J/ . ,. '. ' "" " .. NOTES: . ,~ . ':. ..... , . d01/,1 ~f1J,Uu. jv Ix /rue. lYIo/l/'t!t;., CI~SOcAa.f.cd wI. (J'Yid;z.ecl rooF chCl..nnr/r-. ,'. Revised 4/97 I I, I I I I I , I I' I I , I I. .1' I I I I -, , DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland DeDneation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Sf h'2Jbroot.·-Unit-O. Applicant/owner: Investigator(s): 13. Ho//owtUj, In, /3odeni t:lh1j) Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? C§) no Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes <:::i:i(p Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ~. Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant.Plant Species Dare: /tJ!J.'/o.'-/. County: ~~ State: WIJ S/TIR: 'b" . r Z,JV ~'1e Community 10: p~S ii .. Transect ID: 1.v~"t( __ .Q.. D-t Plot 10: P~f 111-. Stratum % cover Indicator cr :fr-' r.l'\v.,t ~ 5v.: ~ I I s 1-6. ~\V I I I I I ,I I 'I I I I I I , I .of- eSbvi'o A., ("'WI >t.-f1 { tt.t.l; ~ r 5. ~() ktJ ,', -* f(L.(..i4/ PhM~r'c. tt,." .. Jt\(j/~~ If 10 (-e-rn ~f?P' (?). H Tr4Ce. 1C:c:.~ ~ lo-a.:k(l.,r1e:.-S TY&I((. ( ~M fk*'1 nu.~ ) HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL. FACW. & FAC 7(3 ~ feb 1Q Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation'ofplant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations v areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations Z Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? cffi) no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: ceo "," ,.,vd't!. t2 1;>.-/ /.IN..·tl 1(-'lrI." lJes~"-f:' 0 "\".0 "LA. ·-r{,'.,z_. ~·TI~ "pL..c;t 's ~A.J.~. I HYDROLOGY Is it ~le growing season? ~ no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no v other (explain) loc.ll.le1I_,.:t~ ~ Dept. of inundation: --inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Loc~l Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in.<YeV no Depth to free water in pit: --inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Depth to saturated soil: inches Ch~ck all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Sti-eam, Lake or gage data: --Aerial photographs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? cE£) no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: J' . :.::-o.·{ "J /).~ I(.i.e 71.'-< .... -fA' ,:;!' S oZ" at(? (f!. v .. -tf:-'2-_. ~-". -. '~)<'c·c.·~~~r-Q.r~~-rl~~:al'c.I~ ~~~~:~{:=~ c· rr"': r ~I I ~ I v' .. ' SOILS Map Unit Name . e./~iX (Series & Phase) . Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) o -If+ A· ~.5y:5/~ 7. 5Y/( .f/v; Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) --Histosol __ . _ Histic Epipedon ~ Sulfidic Odor re. ttlly { .... ;" J. __ Aquic Moisture Regime _. _ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? (ill:> no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: . (L\l-fQndD -I.) . 'nr~inage Class pQ?r(1 ~ ~ Field observations confitm Gs ~' e? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions,' Drawing of soil size & contrast ' structure, etc. profile (match descriQtion) C-1J?YJP]tTTl; n'ne- SJ fly c ItIj f()t:\./'Y1· me d/ lAm) pnrr:w1Jj ~ Matrix chroma ~ 2 with mottles _._ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils _'_".. _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on NationallLocal Hydric Soils List Other (explain in remarks) ,'S " v--d I' t:-It;:t') v~ (rf ky#/' t:,/ L OL<.-c. .. L .. ,r'OIo\.oo\.e...... k.."1"\.. ""t f"" ~. iV,j ,,,~cRo)r. -f{vf.:'t v' .e.~ . 0;;0"( $ . Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? 6§D . no Hydric soils present? @D no Is the sampling point ®. no Wetland hydrology present? ~ no within a wetland? RationalelRemarks: r .... ,..O:'·T·C~ S It i ( -n ... r Ilt<..... . Ff't. ':-~~"""'I .d iLr S l.'\-4.(J.. --;i.Q.. ~I!t-'I"( (t<-. I oc"r,;:r{ I (), I.· I I t-~ I' '""t"L... "". • 1'\-" j.(,/ .e.::rl ~J NOTES: Revised 4/97 I I I' I I I I .. 1_·-· DA T A FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination I , 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: .~ p V'; Y\J b rooK I ~ 1\'.-+ D Date: /1>/2..1(°\ I Applicant/owner: . County: K.: "') State: .....;.4 ·Investigator(s):·li'rA-t -rol\he/ I Ih .. "'t.. A-"1ek. SITIR: ~ i.;. . ;-z.~;u 1<.4 eo (W A State Wetland Delineation ManuaJ'or I Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? . 6ii/ no Community tD: ~..l I..)M-I· .. ~ Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes G? Transect ID: V~I Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes no Plot JD: 1..5 C. /-VI. . C>~l?) I Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine)· I Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator R./\h" t1l." 1 ,.1., v' ttl.'" ; . ~ fo+ ~,.v .4-111"'1 (tit b r t, r.--to If-Jct-C-I , I~* )}-I ~"' b L. 'J S{ku/-111', \ I ~ S ~+ fh"/f/' ! "Yv.I,kJlllteA ~!) -:f I~\-J_ , .5 \D *' -+tLVc.J 5 lu .:I.-~t/ ·S~",b"L.II\' ~;o~ 4rYl/.A_' 5e'(\"e.f'... I 'St: 1\ t \~c.'\ "'1t\~V Ii\. T t]:f)* (~c..-""'-t ) (y' /1\ ')(0.. "'j lAtCol itA {;p.fl:kJ 'I ~IA/ . U j I Sf',lev-dOL.o)~S"i ~~2 tb~ L f&pt:-\'" ~ 6fJ5~()"~hr" "\ 'LV .~ .fa.,c. I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAe 7/9 i.~b7'D I Check al\ indicators that apply & explain below: ,I Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive a.daptations -P-areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database Morphological adaptations ~ Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (explain) . I Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decisionlRemarks: .)?lVl1f) C P ) t7-'f JIlVY\'''...\~cA PI "'1J.,r{) f"y{ ;c. S" fLZi(~.) I HYDROLOGY ,,""\ Is it the growing season? ifiY no Water Marks: yes fy( Sediment Deposits: yes.~ I on '" Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes 6i Drainage Patterns: yes §J L.../ other (explain) .' (t)C.td c...IlIL .6±-e.. did /l.. ~/. I Dept. of inundation: --.incb~ Oxidized Root (live r0fn~, Local Soil Survey: yeVno \ -Channels < 12 in. yes no ... ~ Depth to free water in pit: "'---mcues FAC Neutral: yes f~ .. ./ Water-stained Leaves. yesW Depth to saturated soil: ---inches ~ I Check all that apply & explain below: ( ~"exPlain): \" , ~ ~f(o.t L-. Stream, Lake or gage data: --9D"""~(l'lL .1--~y~vvr '1 1 c· cJv~~ ,f''' f ,\. ..... -114' Al!rial photographs: Other: () J \. Y rA'v . L {, (1; \ ) ,U ./ t J s,; v" ~; ':. ~I $" / ~ "", I Wetland hydrology present? @ no . ~'.: ,;" I Rationale for decisionlRemarks: I; . ~~,< .~. \: h~1 ~I '.{ '. 4.: "'Yb\1fJ f\',L ~ o~ c . Vt.J..,-.1 '\ ,"p. L.' 't ut J_ \ f ( I!. ~.f. (,0 I. e.. ) (.J • .: : .' \~.' '; .. . '~"<.\. , .. I ~.~ .. ,. '. """, . , ::~ SOILS Map Unit Name k-ocJ./.,,,;lI'te. 5,'(~ lo'~ (Series & Phase) Taxonom Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) , (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) 'O-~ A-, W~/ ~/'L --- i-~~ ~1-. {D yr ~/'2-ID,,,.5/(; I i·-\ ~\' ~ I D \j'v 5/Z 10'(1 (/-b .' Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) __ Histosol __ . Histic Epipedon --Sulfidic Odor __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=1) matrix Hydric soils present? r~ no Rationale for decisionlRemar. . LoLJ (.,h,.l'o"",~ ","",A IIY\O W<.c, w-U.-I- Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~. Hydric soils present? Wetland hydrology present? IYeV RationalelRemarks: ........ 5: t c. (,lLeJ ~ e:-I \ ") (II ~1 c v; /I NOTES: II It'\~OVT tk- no no . no "''''). Drainage Class POQcll tRCftO ",1 Field observations confirm Yes No Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descriQtion) "--5,C- R --<-YnJ1 VI. 1 I . r.A t ~ ~ t~ vJ' s; L-r-.t>rCil~1 .-r Vl" " ~I F!....(. I VI"""'1, I {:.-.e ~" -;"'1 1o"""", .~;~V"'(.V L Matrix chroma::; 2 with mottles __ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils ·List Other (ex,EJain in remarks} vV ~+Lr; Or\. GD no Is the sampling point within a wetland? -r~ J'-(-Yo / <-I> vi;-I" L: \, ~ .,.1 e..-ttl\~ D-/~. Revised 4/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix C -Wetland Photographs A-I -eastern edge of A-I -showing shrub community. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ~ Waallinolon "alo "II Departmonl of TranaportDllon C·1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A-I -shrub community on eastern edge of A-I, second photo. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 S Washlnglon 81Dlo Y/I Dope_nl of TrDftlporlallon C·2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A-I -drainage ditch in eastern portion of Wetland A-I, traversing west across wetland. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 S W •• hhloton 81010 "'II Dopertmonl of " .... __ 8110n C·3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A-I -northern edge of A-I, ponded area with multi-stemmed willow. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 8 :::=':'~~Ion May 2005 C·4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A-1 -remnants of old culvert (non-operational). Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 200S .$. W .. =:I ton atate ~II De n. of Tranapartatlon C·S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B-1 -Po/ygonum-Typha community. looking west. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B-1 -transition between emergent and forested communities. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ~ Wuhlnlton "ate "" Depattriitlnt Df T .. noportJItlon C·7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B-1 -transitional area between Oakesdale mitigation site and Wetland B-1, second photo. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 C·s I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B-1 -small ditch into Polygonum community. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .$, Wahtnaton ltat. "lIl1eputm.nt of ""~Ion C·g I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B-J-northern edge of wetland -plot 5. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 4 W .... lngton "a'. Y!' Departmen' of TrenapMellon C·10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B-1 -culvert outfall area, overview. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B-t -southern culvert on southern edge of wetland. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .$, w .... 1ngton ... te "II Departmant of ' .. ....,......Ion C·12 I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I C-J -forested community, facing west from Oakesdale. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ~ W .. /ll!IIIWn It~ .. "II .,.,.,mi ...... Trall8JlOfbtlon C·13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C-l -wetland upland matrix area, facing north. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ... ::r.: Waohlngton atata Y/I Dopartmonl of Tronlportatlon C·14 I I I I I I I I .1 I I I I I I I I I I C-2 -emergent community facing west. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .$, lIV .... 1ngto1l Itat. 'f/I ....-... t of Traupartatlon C·15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C-lIC-3 -ditch facing south from access road. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .$, W .. hlngtoi! It ... "II Department of rra....,.....llon C·16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D-I -forested community in Wetland D-1. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D-l -ponded area dominated by Polygonum. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .$, W .... lngton It ... "" Dep.rtm.nt of Tra~tlon C·18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I· , D-l -culvert on western side of wetland. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 f!iiP. Woahl!tQtOn Gtoto 'il/1J1 Dop_onl of """",-,,,llan C·19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D-l -culvert on western side of wetland showing steep slope from railroad. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 ~" W •• hlngton IIlato "'11 Departmonl of T,_rtallon C·20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D-l -culvert outlet from western side of wetland from railroad grade. Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report May 2005 .... ;;1'.:" W.ohlnglon 81alo "'" D .... rtment of Tranaportallon C·21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix D -Wetland Survey Maps Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report 8 :::=~':.~ ~Ia~~.n.porta'ion May 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LEGAL DESCRlP770NS BOUNDARY A: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 577122 me LNI:J REFERR£lJ ro III lHS a:aa.tlJlENT IS SllWJlD III lH£ STAll' CF 1I!'A.Sf.c)'tJ'(, NI) DESt:RIf!1£D AS Fl11.OlOSc LOrs '. 2. 7 A/IIO a BlCXJr It ~ Naf1H£RN IM:JtIS1RfAL PARK RENTON At Aa::tJDiWC: TO THE PiA T FIER£lY RCt:afD£D IN IG..tAI£' In (F PLA ~ PACES .. 2 THRaJQI .... M1.USI'W;. IN KING cx:lM1Y. ..ciiHIHG1tW; 1DCElHER .1H mAT PaiJ1Qf t7 lHC FORMER 20 FOOT RAIl.R!JAD RJGHT-U-IPy' AS OiIMCAiED at S4ID PIA T ALJ.Jt:IIOIC SAC) LD~ AS RE1..MU5HlD U1iD£R RECORDIIIC /IIUJ4!ER_ll909"tJ6B1. BOUNDARY B & C: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 577123 JHC I.AIID REFfRR£D 10 /If 1HIS CDAIITJIENT IS 91l1AlID III JHC STAll'" CT .... 9fIH(;1'lW. N«J DfSDl!B[IJ AS Fl11.OlOSc ~ AU 1HOS£ PORTDtS tT GO"o6lNII1ENT LOT rr. OF JHC stlJrHrII£ST t:JUAR1f.'R OF 1H£ NafTH£AST QW.RT£R MID DE SlX1D£AST aJARIDl IY 1JE 1ICR1H'iII£ST Q.JARTER C'T SCCm:w A ~ Z3 IC'RTH. RNI&C .. EAST. lIUAWC1'1r .II[RDAIiC. IN ICING C(UlflY. ~ lE5DlJBEZ) AS Ftl.LCHfS- 8£GINItING AT A POINT or 11£ CAST t.K OF CiIJlERIGI£NT LOT 10 IN SIUD SCCDCW AT A PQIIT 2!S.5..JB' F£CT .szzm.£Rl.r. AS M£A5UFr!D Al.DNC SAl) EAST LIN£. F'Rf:M THE saJiH LM" CF HDIR'r tI£ADCR DCWA DatI LAND ClAIJIIfO. ... THENCE IIE51EQtr CJ!I A S1RAICHT tIlE TO A POINT CM DE EAS'lZRtr tINE OF TH£ 1ICR1H£RJI PACIFIC RAIL"" COIIPANr RJQfT-(7'-W'AY AT A PONT 25.12 FEET SCJtI1H£.M.y. AS AII£ASUR£D N..OIIG SAID £AS1ERlYl.ll£ FROI SAl' SDIJ"DI U1fE OF DE DCWA DOlI I.AIID Q.AIII AIID 1H£ DCt£ PONT OF ~ rHfNCC SDtIl1£AS1ERty m A PONT (II A t.MC PNlAUE1.. _1H AND tID FEET EAST f7 .$AD CAS1'EIi!.Y UH£ OF THE IKR1H£RN PACIFIC R.Aa.lrAy CDII'AIIY RlQ{1-!7-wAY AT A PaNT '.roo F£CT NORlH CT THE CAST-tIEST CENT£RUN£ CF SAID ~ 1H£NCC samt Al.DNC SAD PARN.JD. lINE. 10 A PaIIT QI 1HC SOUTH UN£ CF A JRACT cz::JrnE'lfI:J 10 BRDADAOi!£S. .we 8Y DEEIJ R£J::QIlJED UIID£R R£CaifJINC MJIIB£R ~a.J7.X SW PC'INT 8£ING 54S.6 FCCT NaflH CF SAl) EAST-MfST CDI1ERl.II£: ~ E.AST. ALCWG SAID SlVDt lMC m rHC EAST I.JItI£ OF 1H£ SOUlHJl£ST aJAI1fER C'T 1H£ IfCRlH£AST 0UAR1ER OF $&I) S£rJ'JDIrI A1 A PC»IT 545.5 FEET IICRTH OF SAID CAST-lEST aNTUaJIIIC; JHfNCC samt AI.DtG SAD FAST UN£. ro lHC NC'RTHWCST C'I:1RNCR CF LClWGAOlES PARJOIiIJr AS DlELWEAllD 011 THE FACE OF ~ HORlHERIf ~ PARK R£NTOIt .. Ac::a:RJNC TO 1JE PlAT lH£R£l7 R£CDlImED ", KUGIE n OF PlAJS PACD" 42 l'HRaJQI ...... ~ III ICING CXlUN'Tr. ~ TH£NC£ SCV7H 1JT'STsg-!lEST ~424.00 F££T. Ilal£ ai ~ 10 rH£ 1H1lR5£Cl'DIf CF DE 1II01lTH£R1. T £XTDISlQf (T J11£ £ASllRt r UII£ or mE PR!POSED P-1 01AINl AS 5Hf1JW eM lH£ ASm£ REF£RCNCnJ . .etA 1. SUD I.JII£ BEJIIC 1D..£IJ nn; MR! at L£5S. ~ OF lH£ IKIRTHJII£ST aRII£R fT LOT 5. atJO( 9 iT S4.G PlAP. J1£NCE SQJlHERL Yo AUM; SAm D'lll'«5DIf. TD A ~ ..at 8£ARS SOUTH 6tJ'Z!J"'Z9-CAST FRQI A PONT BfJNC .w£A,.5UIi'EJ AI.CWG 1HC EAS1ERLY UIfE OF SAIO RN...ROAD RlQIT-OF-WAr AND 2.02a" FEET Ifal1H OF 1HC SOfJ1H UNE. OF SAl) .srrJlOiIt EXCEPT lHA 1 POII71fM ~ fIT ~7RAL PUCCT .$EZ.IND R£aQICAl 1RNfSIT AlI1HtRTr lIT K11fC caJN1Y CAUSE NO. 02-2-21737-5 MiD AS IlD%JIlDED f.N1ER R£CrJR!»fC MAIBER ~DI!t mcctHCR .TH AU lHtJS£ PfR110IS OF ~T [DT 9 ...,., t:T JH£ SDJTH£AST QUARTER OF lH£ Ift1InH£AST OJARTER OF sn:m:w ~ J'DWi:5HIP 2J IDlTH. RAIICC 4 EAST. ~ ~ IN K1IIC ca.wJY. .... ~ DaCi!BED AS Fa..LDrIS; ~ AT A PONT 20 F'EET ~ OF IHE CAST UIE OF Gt1tIDiIfIrIENT LOT II AND 1.2542D F£C1 SDJ1H iT THE NalTH UII£; 'DDIC% NClilH 1!tT24'~ IIEST r..a29.4.J F£ET IIal£ CR LESS ro A PONT lDD FEeT CAST OF lh'£ II£ST Uf£ OF ~TLOT5t JHDICC saJrH '11l'.s:-lEST (III' A I.JItIE PNlALlEJ.. JtJ NID .lDD FEET CAST OF 1HC lEST l.II£ CF ~T laT 9 AND JH£ lEST LN£ CT JHC 5aJlH£AST QJART£R OF' 1H£ NORT1EAST QJAIl1ER OF S£C1DIf 25. ~ FED: DtDIC£ saJ'DI 811'24'4lr EAST '.0.JZ.55 FEET ~ al lESS 11) A PaIIT ZD F£CT II[ST OF lH£ CAST 1.11/£ OF SAD SCU1H£AST QJARTFR OF 1HC NORnEAST ~ 1HE1ICC NCRTH a-49'la-CAST 8c.5.t9 FEET 11) PlAtz CF Ba:IJrNIiC' cxr:::tPT DIA T PORT1Qf CXIiIRV!D RR SCUlHllGT 27TH S1R£ET BY IJ££D R£aRI1ED UIIDER R£Q:RtJM; MDIBER 6:1tD150S'6: rrx;;vHER .rH 'DIE SD.11H£AST QUARTER CF THE IIC'IfTH£AST aJARTER CF SD:'1iDN.Zl. 'tlJWIt!HP ZJ IICIR1H. RNIC£ ., CAST. ~ Mm!DWrI. IN K1IIC CDtIJIf1"r. JMSHI'WG1'DIIt EXCEPT DiE EAST 2D FEET 't11ER!EI7': AND 0tC£PT ANT F'CRTIOIf lHl1f£r7' LJDIiIG II1HlN 1HC PlAT OF I!!IURLJIIG1l1IIICfl»f£R/II J/IIIIX.lSDiIAL PNlK R£1fTOltl ~ ACI:Di!llIC TO mE PlAT 1H£R£lT R£aRJED ", IICI.UIE ,,1 CT PIA ~ PAtZS <Q THRaJQI .u. MU5\oE III KPIG CElJNTY. ~ AMJ DtC£PT ))fA T F'C6I11OI t l'1IC E"AS1m.)" OF THE FtI.L.DJMM: £IE'SO'aBrll 1./11£: lJEQNIIIIIC AT A PONT 01 THE NanN IME or SAID SlJI1THCAST aJARTlR or THE Nt:ITlH£AS'T t:AJAR1£R rHCH tS .Jm FUr EAST OF fH£ NalTHWCST ~ JHENCC sanH ann'.-g* IllES( 011 A UIIC PARAI.l.D. m MID .Jm F£ET CAST OF JH£ iI£ST Uf£ CT So\C) SOU1HEAST a.JAR1ER (T lH£ Ha1THEAST Q.IAR1lJt m 'DE I«1R1H UIIC OF Lar 7. lUJCI( 1. IJUIll..M(;1tW IIDn1ERN IClISl2aAl PAlIK REN10II .. ACCI:Il!INC 1tJ me flAT 1JIER£J7 R!lXRJEI)' III \ICI..LIM£ 'TI CT PlAr.t PACES .f2 fHRaJ(;H #. 8IIICl.1IS\t: IN IOIIG CXUf1Y. ~ M«J lh'£ ~ OF SAl) IJIIC: AICJ £Jtt:£PT NIT Pf1R1JfM JHER£DF UWG _1HII lH£ ~ 8£CI1IMWG AT lHC NCIlTHCAST aRNER fT SMJ cmGMEJrIl LOT .. rHE1ICE IKJR1H aT71~ lEST At..CM,; 7H£ NCII11f U€ fHER!£l1F A I1I5TMI(% OF 2D.1J1 F£CT lD 'tHE JIE'ST LIE" CF lH£ EAST 20 FEET CF SoUl QM2IIIWOfT LOT .fit 'Df£1ICC SOU"IH cr.w-,-,-IIfST AU:JW; SW lEST fJIIE A D/STAJICE (T '..25<20 F£ET rtJ lH£ IIt1I1tH t.JI!E OF A TRACT OF LMO CDf1El!D ltJ lH£ arr or R£N1l1N BY DaD IiIlXJi!Df!J (MtJER K1IC CXUf11" Ii!£D:Iii!IWC -~ 1HENCE IoI.CWC' DE NCR1H Uf£ CT SU7 tRACT CT I.AICJ IICIIlH lS8'2.f'7 rEST A QIS7.iUIIIC£ CT 1.022J2 F£ET 10 A lJIlI£ PARAU.D.. _m AIIlJ .JDO FUT CASlDZl)" CF 1)£ IE3T UIIE CT SA&J GIJ16lMIEN1 tOT , AICI 1H£ ImE PaINT OF ~ . 1IE1ICC AUWG SAD IWlAIJ.D.. UIIE t«If1H 'T1T4ti CAST A asTAIKE OF ~ao FEET; lH£1fC£ NCIInJt lI6'2.nr lEST A CISTAM% OF .lIXlD1 FEET It) l1'!E IIE5T UIIC t:F SUD Ci'l1'elMIE1IT I.DT • 1HENC£ AUMG THe IIf'37 UNC CT lHC .samosT aJNftER iT f1£ IItRTHCAST QJARTER (7 SID .5B:lDW 22 sanH 'T!Td IIDT A t1ISTNICE" .snao FEET; 1HE1ICE Sl:VJH Si/T24,r CAST A £IST.ANIC£ (7 Jr:I1DJ nET I'D A I.IIIE PARAU£L rnH AKJ .lDD FEET EAS1Di!. Y CF 1H£ EST Lat£ OF l)£ SDJlH£AST QIARTER " DE IfOIID£AST QUARTER CT SUJ .sa:DOf Zf; lH£NC£ ALar.; SAG PAIW.l.El. UiI£ Nal1H tn"aTd £AS1 A I1ISTAIfCC CF ~ FEET 10 ~T CT ~ ~ AU. 1HA T P'C1R11tM CF SlrDQiIf Z1 JtmPtWP 23 IIOI1fH. RANCe .f EAST. ~ MOZIDrAIt IN KJIIC ctIJIIIn ~ trwrc ~Y AIID IICRlHCRLr CT lHE PLAT OF" SUII1IIIC1'CIIIItR1HE.RIf JIIDJ:51RW. PNlK 1l£1ITCM .. ~ ro f1f£ PlAl DEREl7 ~ IN K1f..DE ,n cr PtA 11 PACES .f2 J"HRCIJCH .... JIIIICU.I:5nI:. IN II2fC ca.wn:. ~ AlL 8EJI«; IIIOIi£ PAR11CU.ARL Y D£SCR1I1EIJ AS R:UDE: ~ AT rH£~.sT CQ!IJIER OF U1T 5 III Bl./JCI( II CF SAG PLAT OF ~ NallHERN .N:Jt.IS17aAL PARK R£NTDN NO. .. 11eK:C Nal1H ~-~ AL,CM; 1H£ IIt:II1H UfE CT SMJ PLAt A DISTAIICE OF 2D.fX1 FEET 10 ITS W1ERSC.C11tW .m IH£ £AS"lDa.r UIIC CT PRQPICI5ED ,-, QtAMIIfi; J1I1EM:£ NCIITH O2lJ7'rl· CAST AI..OC T1E CAST IME OF 5o'ID 0WIIIIfl ~ I«1IftIERtY A Dl5TMtII% OF I..5EQ.OO F£ET., IIORE OR u:s:s. ltJ IlS IIf1£1lSE1:1DtI .11t A I.M£ 1HA T BEARS IGlTH ~ I£ST IROM rH£ IK15T ~ Y Ct1RWR OF ~ PARJrlIAr. AS DltICATlD'''' lHE RAT OF I1JJIIUIICTfJiIIIitR'THCM &NCIlS1'Rf.AL PARK R£NfOII .. SAID Pt»IT B£JNC '" DI£ II£5T I.IIIE CT GC1'fI/£RMII£NT lOT g M 1HC IKR1HEAST t:I.lARlER CF SMJ SEr1J[W zt 1H£1CC sanH lJ7""S7"J9-CAST. A CI:5"TAMX CF r..624..00 F(E[ IICR£ CR L£SS. m ns ~ WITH 1H£ ~Y CIJRIIER OF SAl) 1i!OfT~ __ r.. SID PCIIIT AtSD B9IC 01 lIE 1I£S7l.ME CF SAIl GOlGMEHTLDTSP: FILE NAME nME DATE: DESlGNED BY ENTERED BY CHECKED BY PROJ. ENGR. REGIONAL ADM. REVISJON lJt£NCC SIJU1H O1"3D"sr-M£ST AlC::WC lH£ IIES1ERl r UNC CT .$AI) IiJCHT-(F-WAr.. A lJSTAHCE" CF I,$7D.'2 FEET m ns 11'11UlSCCntw wrn THE IKSITH U1I£ OF Bloor 9 CT SUJ PLAT I'RflECfCD £A51lRLr.. SAD PaNT ALSO B£1IIC lHC stlIDf£AST cr:RNER OF JH£ MRTHI£ST QJAR1ER OF DE stUlH£AST OUNITUl rT SAO SErllC:lN .z=. TIEJIC£ NallH 117""'27 M£ST AI.DIC ~ HaITH Lftl;, A asrANCE OF '.J.47.S F£ET; T1£JICE NCRlH ae-.JZ"5'. IllEST ALlMG THE: NanH UII£ OF SAO 8l.OCJr 9. A asT.AHC£ CT Z7S.79 F£ET 10 THe lRUC PONT IT 8CCZItNNC: OCEPT lHA T PfRfJOIII rHER£rF CXWlC1'!D m 8l.fUWC1tW NalTrlEJiW IWI.ROAD ~ J1C. BY OEED REtlRl£D UIIOER RCcr:Rl»IC MM8ER lSJII7D955. ~ lOT 7. aLeX" 7. SURJ.JNCT'OIf NORTHERN N:IUS"JRJAI. PARK R£HltW .. ~ ltJ 'tHE PlAT TH£R£CJF ~ ", M1tAIC '" CT PtAIS. PACES 42 rHRQJQI ..... ~ IN KIIIC CCU'fTY,. .A~ CXCEPT TH.4 T PORTlrM OF SAl) LOT 7 c.::arn£)'£D 10 THE aTY OF RENTOI FOR ROAD PlSiPCISlS BY DaD R:£a:RJED UNDER R£r:tJRI»IC MJII8£R 4lD5DS0701 AltO AS c::tRR£ClED 8., R£CallINC MJIISER 4lOi!Il5CIi!5a" TOCCIHER W1H THE II£ST HAJJ CF 11£ Fa8l£R 20 FOOT RAIJKJNJ RlCHT-(T-WAY ADJI»IIIIC ON THE E.AST. AS /l£l.JIIOJISII£ UND£R R£J:DRI)IIfC MAIBER 8909110687. ~ JNAl PCRTlOH CT L015 I NID 6, 8tOCJC' 1. PUl OF BlJRI..JJIt:TON IIC'Rn£RIf JrCJI.lS1i;!Al PARK RCNTaf" Aca:JillINC 10 1H£ PUT Dt£R£DF" REalQD£D ", 1Q.UV£ It, OF PlA~ PACES 42 JHRaJQI +f • .wa.usn£ /If JaNC CDUNTY. 1PSHNC1lP(. l rwc IKRTH OF 11£ Fa.L.OJINC £J[SiCI08fD UIV£: fJCCIMII/NC AT A PC»IT 011 l1-E CAST UIIC OF SAD LOT I ...::H tES /fCIRlH 01' .. ~· EAST '7Z.S1 FEET FRQI me Sl2J1H£AST CORNER ~ 1H£NCE NORJH 1J1J7!I"2S-IIE5'T PARAU.B. 10 'DiE sanH lItE CF SAID UIT I. A DISTANCE OF t.2C)f..25 FEET rtJ THe CAST tME t:T QA.IC£3DAL£ A\OIU£ SlVl'HI!£ST AND 'DE llRIC'MJS OF SUD OESCRE£D t.JN£. TOCClH£R .m 11M T HAlF OF /JURl.JIIIC1OIf IKRlItCRN RAIlROAD RlQf1-#7-WA y ~ SAID oaaaBEl) PClR110N CF LOrs 1 AltO 4 AS CUT-a..AMl) UIIDER R£Calt»IG HUJIBCR 85l1!1110687: • CXCEPT 1HA T PfRlltW or SAl:' lOT 4 8I.DOf 1. a::M£l'ED 10 THE arr CF R£NTrM RR STR£ET PURPOSES BY DEED R£aMD£D UNDER IfBDi[IIW; IfUJI8£R 8JlJ6Q!10701 MID AS c:a:HrlED BY /l£C'alDING M1MB£R 4lDiS05Q55It (ALSO ICIItTIW AS taT '. arr CF REN1fIII 5H(IlT PlAT NO. SHPl-'25-i!9 RftXRJED tIClfJl ~ M.AIB£R .,aJ:Zrl9I:ID5} BOUNDARYD:FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 577124 111£ LAND R£FCRR£D ro w lHS CDIIWfJICNT lS SJ1UA lEI ., lIE STATe CT WASHNIC1tJIr(. MCJ QESCIIi!JSEI1 AS RI.LDJIS: JHA T PCRTlOf CT THE IKJRTH£AST QlJARlER CT D£ /IIIOR1HJIICST QUARllR CF SCCDQlf.Rt ralt1lSHlP ZJ IIOIItH. RNIC£ .. CAST. 1Q.LAM£71E.MfRDAI\ ., KlIIC CCIINTl;, ~ L nMO CAS1lRI. Y CT 1HE NCR1H£RItI PAClRC R..QRQAD RlCHT-(F-tD r NID l nNG lEST CT 1H£ Fa.LDWIIC D£:StRm!D lJItIE: lI£QIIIIWG AT lHE IICRTH£AST CORNER CF HENRY A£I,oUG t:JfJNA1x:w LAMJ' a...wt 1HDIC£ CAST ALJ2IIG 11£ CCNTCRI.lIIC OF 5alD1 IBDTH STREET {FtIi!toO!. y CXJi'DJ, ".-F£E.T: JHE1fC£ ItIOR1H .lD F£CT 10 11£ NORTH t.MC CF ~ S1R£ET AND 1HE mtI£ PrMIT OF ~ l1£NCC NORm 6+<J.m IF£T; JHCNC£ NDR1H£RL Y 01 A S11lAICHT tM: PARN.L£L 10 lH£ EAST UN£ OF SAD IIOlTH£RN PACIFIC RAa. ... r QJIlPANT RlCHT-cT-WA 1': 10 1H£ /IICI1TH UIIC OF SU) S£r1]OIrI .J& AltO lHE 1ERMNUS OF SAD LIN£: £XCCPT THE SCJJlH JD F£CT ~ AItD EXCEPT 'DIA T PalntW £:J£SQ;E£D AS ItI.L.Oa5: fJ!£ClMIMIC AT lH£ sanH£AST CIJRN£R CF SAD NOR1H£AST QUARTER OF 11£ HtRlHWICST ClllAR'1Ei: 1HENCC IfORTH .JD F£E1; lHENCE I£ST PARAUEl. .1H SAl) SDJ1H tM£ CF S4I) .5itISDf\4!!5IO 10 A P!MT .2I1.SI5 F£C1 ~r OF CAST RICHT-oF-WAY OF ~ AS MCASUR!D AT RICHT AIICI.ES 10 SM) CID ItIAIIIIJItIE lRACT aNrvaJ1J£ AND lJE lRUC PC»ITCT~ D1D«% IfCR1H PARAUa 1f1H S4I:J tID IUJN UN£ MACT CEN1ER1JN£ A OISTAIICE OF 21J...fO F£ET: 1HDICE II£SllJa. r AS .WI£AStIJilD AT RlCH1 ANQ.£S m SAD aD IiUM UN£ lRACT C9f1!RJ..DIIIE: A asrANCE CF 21196 rrrr rtJ,A Pf»#T QISDJtIT 50 F££T CASnJar.. AS AE.A5U'i!I) AT RIQfl NIQ.£S 10 SAIO aD IlAIII UNE MACT ~ 'TH£N!a SOlJ1H£Rly AI..CWC A UN£ 50 FE£T E.AS1Vil. Y AS M£A.Sl.W!D AT RIQfT ANGt£S m SAl:! ClD ItIAIH UH£ mACT C£NT£R1JN£ lD A PONT JD FEET IKJI1TH OF JH£ SCU1H I.JN£ CF SAl) stIEDW!ilQIt J1£NCE EAST 10 11£ PQ/IIT OF S£QJiINIIIIC. BOUNDARY E:FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER. NO. 577125 IHE LNIIJ·R£FERR£D 10 ., lHrS a::MIIDIDIT IS STlUAlB) /If liE STAll' OF ~ NID ~ AS FtI..tDE: uns I. 2 NID of. a.DOf 4. ~ 1IOIIlH£R1f IMJLI:SDilAl PARK R£NTO/tI .. Aa:amIiNG m lH£ PlA T lH£REDF R£aRJED III \Q.UIIC III OF Pl.A1S. PACES n 1HRQJGH ..... oIIII:1lJSnE ., K1NC Q2.IIf1Y. ~ JtJGElI1£R _111 lHAT ~ CT fH£ R:RJI£R ~ R1t:HT-!7-J1A Y AS Q(lM£A 1m C»I SI4J PlAT AO..IlMJIJC SAo(J LD1S. AS RfJ.IIQJI5HED tIM21l ~ ICIItIB£R eas:r'0I5B~ C%CEPT FIE IIalTH 46.1" F£ET " SAID LOT .. AS .IE.A.SIIRD1 AlDC fHC lEST I.JII£ J1E1lD7: AlSO o:c:£PT 1H£ 1It6l'lH f&l...Se FEEl or S4IJ FCJIlWJl RAIl.ROAD 1lIGHT-CT-lrAr AS MCASlIim AI..OJIIG rHC CAST UJII£ HRElF: MIl AtSD EXrEYT DfAT Pf1IfTUI CT SUD LOT 2 DlStRISfD III D££D lD JHE orr OF RDJTaI /l£lZ7IriED UM1£R REt:tJCDM:: IIUIIECR ~ AN) CDi!i!1:DDJtI rH£R£.r¥ R£aIi!D[D t.INOm' ~ MMBER &108Q5Il:55!t (AI.SlJ IC1ImM AS lOT I. arr t7 ~ LDT IJII£ ADAISDIENT Ml ~ ~ UNDER ICING aMIITr R£tJRlINC MJIISER Q2OIS1'SIIXU). B OUNDARY ANALYSIS PARCEL~' BASIS Of BFARIN5" 1IAD.a.J,;9I DIE2\€D FiIf:M c;s (S.SIJlV.ADCJIIS FaI AU PARt:ElS a&SE'D ON II5DOT IIQIUtIDIT MJ. I.lZ!a. A .soal SlUSS /1I'5l( SET INTO lH£ a:wa;£lI' SID£1f'ALK LDCAlED 011 'DE Nt$l1HfllCST SID£ OF JHC 4JiRD/l1!l!11H ST f.ICJCRQbJSSIlh OF SR.V. Ii 4S!/1!!I7. 761 .u.. £ .l!il557!l.f.J.1 II.; 0R1H0 HDQf1. rs..sua II. Q1£DC 10 II5DOT IICMJII£NT M1 527a. A Z-MOt PF£ .1H A 1HR£ADED CAP AICJ FU«:H IIARK LOCATm ~Jll.)" sao nET ~ CF tHE .nERSCrT1I'JIf CF tM) AlL MID SW 2JRtJ SJR£l1: "".T IS ACCEPTED AS lH£ NC aJRNER CT 5lrntW Z1 1lF. V It.. RtZ. • ~ lULL " 5l9!ll627 IrI.. £ ~_'.D At: CR1HD HEJQf1: 4.'sa ... l!fR1lCA.l OAlll!I; fl£VAJlQIiIfS ARC'" ItAMJ _ OAllAl BA5m ON tHE .s.wc I15ZXJT exw1Rl1 IItIOIUJIENTS HOD A801£ c;rzt1?Ql'ftt'i ffl'!1I!!PAR!' MlZ!NfNzs. "TERSEC'11CW IKMIJIIE]IT AT tIIID .. 9'.J.flH. CAS£ I/DMJIIDIT: REBAR ~ CAP AT lHC 11'11 CXIi!I'Iel OF LOT .1 SlCJCil' 4. MID P.e. CIT ~ RADIUS IfE1LflJW af JHC IIEST R/'II UIf£ OF UICJ A\IfM./£ AT lHE NCRTHCAST ca:tIIER (7' LOT .1 BLDCIf 4: IJtIlER5£C11CW OF UNO MID SW 27tH S1R£!l'; CAS£ WMJMEJIT; CAS£" ItOUEIIlS AT P.Co. P. T. NtD P.L CT aJftES £W sw 27111 S1R£ET 8tJARDER1IIG THe IfCRTH BCIMINlY OF lD1S , It 4 BLDOt tt acRUWmlJIf NOfTH£RII HI.IS'lRfAl PARIt R!ENRW .. Rfll2!!1'BT SU!ftfl"i' ') ReS. 8OQ( I~ PC. ~ BY nw HMISIM .. ASSDCIAJES. REI:. NO. ~6 ZJ RENT£W SHalT Fl.Al .5Ht.-• .zs,..a BY BU9f. ROEIJ • HllDIWWi:S. RD:. M1 SJ'a.l2IDODI5 .J) PlAT CIT f1IJRUIG1fRIIlICI1THE1I!I .IClUSDi!Al PNlJt( RENlOII" KL "'. PCS. .r-...... DATE: I BY REDtJN I STA IF I«l TO IWASH JOB_ c:tJKIRACT IfO. lDCAOOHNO. ~ 11£ a£ASlDifD 1H£ CJSlAM7 ALCIIIC UNO AIo(M£ ecTfJI£DI 1HC IlalUllCNTS A T THE I'I1CRS£C11QN wm Sit' 27TH S1R£CT AJ«J SW .J<fTH S1RE£T AIIlJ FaJND fH£JI 10 8C A 1 rH£ PU l(R£T. ~) llISTANa All/) BCA/i1NC S£1lIEDI CAQHJlHER. 1£ CALCtLAlW 1H£ CENTERtMC OF .JD1H srR£CT USING IkE PlAT VALUES AND fQJNO A R£SAR AND CAP SET BY IZII HNISOI (REF. I) 10 BE W 1H£ CDRR£CT POSTIDI Fat THe P.e. (7' 11£ 55' RAaUS R£1URN ON me II£ST R/W UN£ (F UNO A~ AT THE IICR1H£AST talNCR CF tal .l. IJI.DlX 4. 11£ At5D FaJND A REBAR AlII) CAP SET fI)" HAIISl:N AT rHC /fORT1:ffiIIEST aRNER OF LOT 1\ BI.DOC 4. SlJQi1lr 001 CT POSTrM IICRlH oJ AKJ IIE3T 0.1' CT fH£ CAUl.ILAIllJ POSllJDllL I1IC H£LD THE PlAT V..wJ[S (REF. J) 10 CAI..Q.I.A 1£ 1H£ ~ WARrcR C'DRNER CT SiEC1lQf .JD AND 1H£ SCVrH AND I!I£ST UNE CF pARC£J. A. 11£ ALSD R£CDlIfRED A R£BAR AND CAP AT 1H£ Nt1RT1£AST Ct:RN£R CF LOT 2. GZ..ACIER PARK SHORT PlAT. REF. z. lHIS ct::JRN£R DS FQJItD ro BE as' IIORfH t7 rHC vAI..Uf' CAL.a.I.A 1£D. roTA' AP'fA C'7 PAPt%I ·A·: 2.-.2.ac:R6. PARCEL 'B' ropmj'QIII'fr'L Rf'!1MMIf'r MQY!1!If?t15. 1H£ RBXJ\£RED CCNTER1.JNC IIOIUJIDITS ALGWG sw UTH SlREET FROM tHE CAST I.JIt£ CF THE It£ 11 (7' 5£ClitW 2S JW'. ZJ II. RC£. • £. w..w.. aE:S1lRl. y m 1H£ 1NT£RSEaJQf OF 0NaSIlAlE A1D«£ IIGE" fOUND 10 8C OUT CT POSlntJII 2 FEeT SDU1H CT 1H£ aa:tJ t.IWE tIE' CIlD HOT US£ 1HDI ro CSTABUSH DE IfCIRlH UNE cr PARf:EJ. a rH£ 1fCRD1 AND IllEST 8QJHIJARr OF DiE PARal.. IER£ £STAS./SHED BY CALaLA 11/fC DE POSlT1Ol OF THE R/W OF Slf' 27TH S1R£ET AND OAKESDAL£ A\oEMIC Sill!. USiI7C lH£ SlIR1CrS PCRFfJRtI£D 6Y ENrRAHCD IHC. I1f Ig97 AIIlJ 2DXL 11£ FOUItD A t%N1£RLlN£ P.L IIC/IIUJI£NT C»I a.ua:sDAL£ A~ G:5 F£ET SiCVTH CF THE IKlERS£Cl1IC1N WlH SW' 27TH S1R£ET AT 1H£ calRErT POSl~ BASED C»I 1HE CNTRNfCO ALlCNIICNT. ENTRANCtJ,., NOT 1'GICA1£ D£Y HAD FaJND (If SC1 A JKMUJI£NT AT J1.!JS POSTt1ON.. 1£ AL5D FaJND NIOVICR CENlERUII£ Pf IIOtIUIIENT '" cwa:sDAlE "'II£MIC ~ "'0 FFET t«IRIH OF lH£ WTCRSECl10H .1H SW 27TH S7RfIT 1H.AT AQifiD a.asny 'IfI1H THE (Nm..v.rr::D ALJC1GI£Nl FOR OAKESDALE A\I£.IIIIU£. DIE SDJ1H UN£ OF PARCEl. B IS BASED ON FaJND a:JiWERS PCR R£KTON SHOIfT PlAT Sfft-1zs-tJS (REF. 5). 1H£ R/W CT ~ AlOCJ£ SIIJ 1flH1N 1H£ S£ J/4 cr SEJ:11CW 2!1 IMS l!A5ltJ 011 FQJNO CEN1U4MC ~ ...."g., IIA 1DIlD £He PtA 1 PO:!n1tM (RUJ) a.asa.r. RffEBf7'IfT snnns· 4) ROS. BOOK "8;, PC. '97. BY onRAIICO. REt:. IfCl 91C1Bt8Slt1C19 .5j1iOS. 8DC1K Jom. PC. 212. 8'f EN1RAHCtl. R£C. Ml 2OC1tJ(J(iJl19( 6) R/W OUD Ra:. NO. a20J7.5C1:516,. R£C. NO. tHaJ2<K127Z REI: NO. B2071.fOJlU. 7J R/W DEED R£C. NO ~ Tal CIo4KE5DAL£ A.a.tE sa ~ 1£.w£A.SUR£D 1H£ POSfT1I:W (T CI.7IIT1laJ.JNC 1IONUJIEJf1!j AT 11£ 1NTERS£C11DN OF SJn61H S1R££T Ik LIND AlE so. AND J1o/£ INrms£Cl1QIf OF QNtESIlALE A~ SW AND SW'SfTH S1REET Q..05EtY _lH 11£ VAUJES"!iHOWtI '" 11£ £N7RAfJICO SUR\Cl'S (RU . .f iii' ~) MID lH£R£R1R£ H£lD lHC AI.JCIGIENT cr SW' 27lH STRCET NID SW ~ A1o£ BASm eM JH£ CNfRANCO SLIR'£l'S. 1£ USED J1£ CAtCVLA reD EAST ]I CDR1fER CF SCClJOI Z5 (S££ PARCEL ~. NARRA1l\E' ABmE) FaR POSI11CJII AND lHE PlAT vAWES' 10 0£lIRII8I£ DE INlERSCC110N OF lH£ £AST UH£ OF D£ lIE 11 CF SECliCW ~ iW1H lHC CEN1£RUII£ OF SlI' 27TH STREET BASED ON THC CNTRANCrJ AUQlMCNT. rH£ R!l:CIi!i OEED FOR SIr Z7TH S1R£CT (IUt uo:JJ$lBJ6) as T76I R£QS1I1iBJ m 1HS CAlQ.I.A reD 1NlCRSEC11CJN PCMT rtJ CAt.CtIlA 1£ THE ClB\IE c:£DIEDW AT 11£ CAST eaJMJARY OF 1H£ N£ 11 CF SEC1JON a 11£ ~ 8QJ1IDARY OF II£1tAICJ 'D" ALDtC 1H£ R/'II OF 0NtESlJALE AI6CI£ s:. IS BASED elf 7H£ EIITRAJICD ~ ALrHalCH NO OCED IMS .cwmcam IN rHC mt£ R!£P(R1 ro MICA 1£ lHA T lHC FULL RICHT-(T-JlAY WAS' G£tICAllD m lItE cnr cr R£NTtW. 1£ lUDiC THE ASSlAFDOII DlAT rH£ 1ElieAmt t£CAL tJ£SCRF1IDIS PROWDED (II lH£ ENTRANCD Slm\£J5 IIERE' 11£ SA.SrS Fr:R AllY RIQIT-(F-WAr O(DICAnaw OF 0A«£5DA[£ A\EMI£ 5a!. me SOJ"IH DID OF DE ENUlANCD SUf'I\EY CF cwtESDAL£ AliEMJ£ SIt cn£Rl.APS lHC Dl1S11NC RIQIT-cF-WAY (RJf APfIRQII:WAll1.r 'dO FEET OF sao FDOT.a£ Rl&HT-cF-flAy' /U'alDa.Y /fAMED ~~ PARKWAy) I1tnHH THE JIlAT OF SlR1.JII(;T(M 1IOR11«2I NlUSl'RfAL PARK R£NTO/tI • (R£F. ,J) AND THE AD.JAt:£NT LAIIID ro 1H£ IIaT .-1Hft J1£ sa.rTI£AS1 ]I CF SlC'JXJW Z1 ('DEED R£FA)., sa::AUS£ (7' lHrS 0\6.l.AP lHE lEST 8QJIWJAR'r CT PARCD.. 'D" .JOCS FRC'6II All lID FDDT Ml£ a.IInED' Al.JCNllENT OF D.MCiZlAL£ A\OItIr SW FROI JH£ £NTRAIICO ~ ro lHE IiIO RJOT JIID£ JIlAT RlOIT-<F-WAY (Da:Il R£F..6). lHC SlV1H E1IJlJNIJARy OF PARCa '8" WAS FlXCD AT 1HC IIDMJJI£N7'£D SIJU1H UHC OF taT r. ~1ON SHORT PlAT Ml. SHPt-.zs-...tf9 (REF.2). 1H£ Sl1fTHl/II£ST CDINER OF PARaJ. 'D" IMS c:.u..aAAllD A1 lHC 1N'1ERSCC11lW CT rHS IK7IUJICNlfD saJ1H &ME AIIIJ .f$ FEET CAST CF lH£ MCIIUoI9flfD a::NllRJ.JNC OF ~ AIO«.I£ 5W' .1HN tHE sc QJAIi1£R OF .sB:'1JtW zs. mTAl Am l£ PABT7I tr· .lZlSD ACR£5' PARCEL 'C' QZf1ii'Q'1Mi' RrMIQARr H!WIM2flS' CDl1ER1JN£ P.L ItItJNUMDIlS ON ~ A\EME SIJ (SEE PARCEL 'B" NARRA me ABOl£): FOJItID ~T A T DE AIIQ.E IVII1 ON fH£ IIfST LM'" OF U1T .l2. BI1EJIIC UJIIICAC&S ..-_ "ll: PUoN (BSP) RH: """ a:rum.....,.,,_. 4 FfJIHJ ~ AM) snn. FDCC POStS AL.CN:; rH£ saJlH UIf£ OF BOE11f(; ~CR[S AIIDIl£Z) B5P (REF.10} AM) lHE PLAT (REF. .J) aNlERUNC IICMJlI£NTS ON ~ A\OIU£ 5a' JfI1HN rH£ SIr 11 OF sa:m:w 25. E'ffJfRf?!V SYfDflS." 8}ROS. BOIJI( XI. PC. 29!t MIl.SO''' HAl(. ....: REC. NO. 82EZ5DIS9I:Ill' g) ~ BlJO( 1a7.. PIG. 61. .. .. H PAQRC. RD:. Ml. 9tsaUJZ1DU ro)l1OEJIfC ~ AI4JWIJlD ssp. BY .",. INC. R£C. NtJ. 2I:ZUlnClSCI::a::rllU ~ 'DE CAST IJDJNIJAR'r (T 1H£ PARa!. WAS £STABI.B£D AT lHC IIE5T ICDtT-<F-Il'AT fJIIE OF a.ucESIlAIE A\6IIUE SW AS lIE:SCRI5ID IN 1JE IlARRAmE FeR PARaL 'B" A8O\£ ALOIIC tHE NOIiTH UII£ OF PARm.. 'C': 111£ SEARCHED FrR CI1RN£RS CF 11f AD.IACENT BOE1IIG ~ AI/£M1tIJ lJ97 (REF. raj, BUT 110 PERJIANDIT caiJt£R IIARK£RS ~ RX.Nl .trfS1FAD. IE FaJND A lOCI'] HUB AND TAO( AT JH£ SIP AIID SC" CXJQNlRS tE lOT » (7' DE BOIJIC ~ SSP. 1£ ALSO R2JIID SElG'Al szm. FENCE fIQS1S SET AT ,wllRYALS (7' 2!If m .xrtAl..CWG 1HC SQ.JTH UJI£ OF DlACl r CT SAl) 89'. IlATl:HIIC DiE ~ Q\EN IN 1HC ~ 1!i91f Sl1R"o£Y (RCF; I). 11£ ACiD FQIItD A REBAR AICJ CAP (RS IIS4ZZ HUCH a:zJJSM1HJ AT 1H£ AJIQL POKT eM THC ItIE51 UIIC OF tRACT D cr SAD SSP. CJSiIC THC R(CDIiD fi!EAIiIWC' AND OISTNICE F1l'OII l1G a:fiI!II[R.. AS 5HOJrII 011 DE 85P \11£ CAl£lJlAlED lJol£ SCV1H'll£S1 Q1RII£R OF LOT .lJ ~ lIE' FQJIIJ A ~ a»JCRFlE'" UONU1tICNT Q.6 WST IT 1H£ CA&..aa.A lED fICIS1llDI. DE IIOIUJJIENT APF£ARfl) lD HAlo€" BCCN ~ IE51Di!. Y ~ JaY as ltJ '.IT BY 1H£ ROOT QiOWDI OF SMlL mas: JH£ ~ HUB JIENt1QIED ABD\£ IMS FQJItD m BC a.r EAST CF JHS CoWJ:tI.AlED PC1S1l1OC. 111£ £STAStESH£D DE ICBTH UN£ OF PARaL t" lHDI AS'Ift1IU1 ~ BAS£D ON JHE FaJNl) IIICCIJ HIJB AT tHE SE CDiNER CF Lar .1l lHR£C RJUItD SllR FENCe P05JS tOCA 1m 90 FEET IllEST OF tHE S£ t:al1IER OF t.DT.u r.JD FEET CAST OF S£ Ct:RIfER (7' taT Xl AND 7112 FC£T II6T OF DE SC CDlIIER OF JilAC1T": lH£ IIE:ST BaJltllJARr CT PI4RCZJ. 't"" IS l1£ CAST RICHT-tT-fMY UII£ OF IHC 8IfST RALRONJ oa:EPT FtR A SUALL IiR£lUAR S1R!JI"., 'tHE /IKR1HfIIES callIER OF PARCEl. t: 11£ Q£lEHJMI£D lH£ EiIt5F RAIl.Ji"tW) R/'ft POSl11Ol BY tftCHJI/fIG lHE RCaRD 1IC OF sr I€ST. AT RIQfT AIIQ.£5 FRCM lH£ FD.IID aIiN£R SET BY MJCH ~fH Al£N11OI£D ASrClE: AT JHC AM:ZE PC'6IT aI mE lEST tM£ CF IRACT S2 CF t1E BQEJNC LOItICAai£S 8!!iP NIO ~ lHIS PaNT ro rH£ ro A PaIIT !ID' nET EAST ('/2 EJlH OF RM.RDAD RftIJ OF UtE: AS-BUl-T tDCAlDf t:T D£ CEJIflERI.M£ OF JH£ IIM4II£ SfSF 1RADl AlllS 0l05SINC InH JHE ItOR1H RIQIT-CF-aY UN£ OF .sw .f.Jii!) S1ii£ET. R£/Ill:M (S 18l1IH Sl1iaT. K1IIC c:aJKTJ'1 .'D411 lH£ 1m QUARTER OF sa:m:w 3S-zs....,f • .ACXXJi!IINC 10 lHE B1IST RlQfT-cF-WAr PLANS. rHIS.5EC1JOI C1F lRAOllS A SlRAICHT LME lHRQJCHOUT 1H£ SJf' QUARTER It N'I1 QJN1TER CF S£rl1OII Z5 AIID THE N'II aJAR1ER OF S£C'DaIif JI!. THIS POSI11ON FOR lH£ 8IISF RJQIT-<F-wA)" a.asn.r MAJDES 1H£ P05l11ttM AS CoII.aLA'tElJ FRQJ FDJIID 1IOftJJID(lS", lH£ aJ,RtJrIIt:7l'M Nt:RJHERN N:JlISRi!Al PARIt R£JI1rM • PIA 1 (R£F. ~ AlII) snERAL RDDi!IS' CF s:tGnEY. DE SD.J1H UNC t7 PARCH t" WAS CAL.£lLA aD FRmI JHC OE£D CAUS JD 1H£ NORTH UN£ CT l'HE PtA T CT SlJRUfC10II MlIlTH£RN IGJSiRrAL PARle RENTCIII • (REF. .JJ BASED QIf 11£ FCVICJ IIICMJIIDI1S ,. GUI'£SDAl£ AtE SlIJ ItIENTlOEIJ A8Dl£ mTAI AREA t7 eARCO r-.-7.m A(R6 PARCEL'D' CQNlfjIQ..llMj RQrIl!!!QARl HI'JUI¥'llf1'$'" CDllEUWE ~JS' £W S. '6D1H Slil£ET (4JRD Al/fME .9t R£1IlON) A1 J1£"~ .m SR 161 (WEST VAU£Y ICHWA" AItD AT DE S£ calNER CF JiI£ NfI'I/.f. NCI/4 OF .5£Cl7(W ... TIP. D If.. RCE. • £. IlM. RmAR a CAP. AS I.sat. scarr ~ £9C. AT THE ANCLC PClWT IIIfDlUY" tI£ EAST 8I:AJItIIJARY OF PARCEL "0". R(U1ff1W;f S!'~ 11)ROS. 8DDK 50. Pt;, loa. CiI(. R!z:. Ml lI6C1t!i2S!IIXJ IZ)ROS. 8DDK SQ. PC.1S1Q, ROE£RT IIILl.PCIJI1ER. REt:. Ml. ~.2D9SaU U)ROS. fJCO( g1. PC.. 227. BAIl'GHAUSEN 0IQ:NEEll$. R£I: M1 !HD#I9GIU • ''-)ROS, BOar r.n" PC. 25" WA-&-aJ:S-UA. BARQfAUSEN. R£l! IC1 ~2<_""'_"IX'''''J ~ • ~ 1 1HE III£ST BaIfDARY orjPARCR '0# IS lH£ £AST R/'II f.IIIE OF 1HC 8IISF RJIM.ROAD .m A SI«ALL IIIS£T M THE SClJrHl/IICST C'CR'I£R C£ PE PARCEL AS CN.l.£D Fal III THe DaD. lHS Rj'II UNC WAS CSTA8LlSH£JJ AS NOrm III 'DE IfARRA mE' FrJR PARCEl. tJ: DE 5DJTH tMC IUS csrA8LlSH£D FROI FaJMJ IICJM.DICNTS ON .sw .fJRD smE£t USING D1C DaD CAU.S ~ THE R£CDRD OF SlJIl\EY /!Y E:5M (REF. II;' 1£ CALa.lLA1!D tHE POST11:JN OF 1H£ HE aJRItER OF 1)£ HDlRY ~ DOHA 1101 lAIIID a.AAI. JIHCH HAD EI£DI CEUlrRA llD BY NEVI S11l£CT CCWS1iaJC1lEJIC FRf1ItI lH£ ZD !RIJ'III' ()rf RUER£NCC SLfl\o£l'S NO. JI. '2 4' U 11£ R£U£D c:w JUC S£C11OI StIBllf\fSOIIf BY CSM (R£F. II) 10 ~ 117«' NtJIt1H 8QJ11DARY OF 11« PARCEl. AICI Mf' ~ A REBAR .. CAP. PtS 15S6J. secrr ..... 01f1tZ5H. ESII. 0.2' IeEST OF 11f£ DEED POS111DN fOR DE AJIQ.E PCIKT (III JH£ EAST IJQJIIDARr OF PARCn n: 11£ S[.AROI(D FaR OrH£]! a::JRNfRS 9IOWt AS SCT BY 8ARCHAU5EJI 0IQlVCERS ON l1£ /ID.lACDIT PRrP£RTY 10 'tHE r:ST~~~~-;:A~~~nz=~ :-~~;:v~: NO. 2I:X1lD2WQ:ZU27. IIfIDf.YAY AFT£a lHC FURTHER usc OF lHAT POfrrt:M (T lH£ PRCF£RTY BY 0l1£RS roTA« ApfA tT PAec;n I Tr· Ut5 ACRES I PARCEL'E' I g;wmQIlWtj fflLN'ARl"lAl1WlJMf'NZS' C£NT£RlIf£ WCMI.JMOIJS' c:w SW.J.f.lH S1RIIT. auESIlAtE A1IOIU£ SW' AICJ lH£ BQJNIlART IIOHIJJI£J< IS r S SHatI1H eM ROS 8tJO( II7. PC. ,," BY BRH. N;.. 8fU8E2WZ" SRnflS: 1.5)Ji'O:!t fJt:D( B1. PC. '6.S. BRH. ..c... R£C IfQ !l206"g:au ~ 1£ MEASlJI(£D lHC P09~ OF CONrRa.LJIIC IIINJIIOITS AI.DIC sw J4D1 STR££T AT lHE RCCDiD PCS11DtS SHlTIW ON 1H£ SRH. INC. ~ ar Sl.IR\€Y (REF. '5) AND FaJND 1H£ CENTERUNC ItIONIJlI£NT ro 1H£ SOUlH ALDNG QA.ICE3iDAL£ A~ sw I,ro BE AT THE R£aIi'D ANa£. BUT FNfTHfR salrH By o.a.r.. 11£ FaJND REBAR IIOICJJI£1fTS ..... TOIINC H R£CQfiO. \SU AT. OR /If aa5£ PRtriDI/Tr m THE R£tXIiD VAU.£S CIII 1H£ NallH BQJNDARY OF IWlCEL Co IfONHC Ilks FaJItD Al lHC SClJrH cam£R. lHtS POSI11QI lAS CAlaJl.AlED FROItI REDJRD vALU£S SHa'IItII (II REF.'5. I lOTAt MfA <T~ t ,~ ACRfi VICINITY MAP LEGEND + -, AZ9£ t II£11AMJ FlAG ~ I~87 ED IIOMJIIElfT M CAS£ t I o R£1!AR AIID CAP AS NOT£D ------! F£NC:E AS NOTED WilfI I ~ II£JLoWD AllY g HORIZONTAL bA TUM NTS I ~ 83 / 91 ~ STAlE D£fWill&DfT OF lR.lHSPORTAlOI WQM.JI,I:[NtS. ,1385 MID f5Z7a WA. NDR1H STAlE PlANE PIIDJ£rI1QrI I I \ VERTICAL DA TUM I IIAVD 88 Wo!HICTDN SrAIE DEPMI1IVfi OF lRAMSPORTAllON UQNUU[JC1 ,1J88 EJ..£V-52.29 I ~~~.6U! ~ ..", KEY MAP NTS p_ro HUfIT ZOLlARS 302 South 9th Street. Slite 101 SH£F:T , Washington State T accma, WastW1gton 98402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 IT '0 OA1£ 0All: SIiEE1> po£. STAMP SCl% P.LS. STNtIP 8CIX ~ .,.; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r- i e 110 1 ~ I ,," ;:j:! t 13 FOUND _INI CASF AT P.e. • C£NTERI.JNE OF' SW 27TH ST FILE NAME nME DATE D£SJGNED BY ENTERED BY CHECKED BY PROJ. ENGR. REGIONAL ADM. REVISION l!!!!35J2",,-,E~ ___ _ 7-4,5.09" DATE IBY _I 51> IE" NO. 10 IWASH _NUIIlJER CCMTRACT Ml. ux::o __ WETLAND & BOUNDARY SURVEY SITE A CASF AT CENTERI.JNE OF IINBA"! .t-SW--e-_ ~UNDAVESW_ NtJ7-:J.t.~ soas:r ..... • Washington State DAlE" "'IE" . P.£. STAMP eax P.LS. STAMP ear --1 ------~ ---e-~SS2.47~ FOUND II~ IN CAS£: AT C£NTERI.JNE OF UND AI£.t-SW :urn ST ---========+-G..-Z " , I I ---I o 25 50 100 F'E£i HUITT -zollARS 302 SouIh 9th street. &lite 101 Taccma. W~ 98402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 SHEET 2 <T '0 SHEC1S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CASF AT PaNT or INTERSCCTION e OF SW 27TH ST FaJND lION IN l .'" 11(;~ r I FaJND /JON IN CASF AT PaNT or INTERSeCTION or SW 27TH ST FDVND liON IN CASF AT P. T. 1-... ". C£N7U?LJNE or SW 27TH ST Iii I' '" ~ !it '" eN , -"'~o· UXA_IKJ. ~ -Washington State (iAlF P.c. gAIIP 8tD P.L.S. STAJIP 8tJX FI<¥ Z 1611 + + £w« ,3,10. Reg 2 r" CIne U99 22J11 12.., FaJNI) REBAR .. CAP AT PROP£RTY CORNER HUm -zoLlARS 302 SouIh 9th Street, SUte 101 Tacoma, W~ 98402 Fhcne (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-47.10 SIiEET 3 (F 10 SHEEIS ------------------- 000 I N 8 6 ~ ~ 6 ~ ;of ~ '" ~ W o .. U " .., II • u ;j, i: .. • ' e f ; 4110' I .u~,1 !u ~ ~ .8 III ~ I q!i1 I:§ ~ii I i~ .. NIIJ':J4'IO-W I/gau' -'''O·'~r----~~~-----------1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FOUND AION IN CASl" AT CENTERUNC OF OAKESDALE A 1£ a SIt' 27TH ST 0 0 0 0 s ann .... ~ \ -.. ~' f OAJICFSDItLE AVE SW -, -.-~ .. L=«2-B5 R=6l1OQ.OO _"73'«" ca-~:m-'F a. .... Z75 -=========+-G-.-Z .... , ;, 25 50 -180 FrrT LOCO""" NO. Ii) FOUND /JON IN CASl" AT PaNT OF INTfRSCCTION OF OAKESDALE A 1£ DAn: TIL STAMP 8IJX P.LS. STAMP sax "" L-.l26./U ~OO lP3T17It> CB-HCIl"24"S2"111 a.=326.8D ~ -Washington State FOUND REBAR a CAP o.,r lit OF PROPERTY ~ ~:::::~: ~~ N013d2SF~CDlNER RJUND lION IN CASl" AT CENTE1IUN£ OF llAIaSIlALE A~' .. ~ HUITT -zoLlARS 302 Soulh 9th street, SUite 101 Tacana. Wast1ingtcn 98402 f'hane (253) 627..gJ3J Fax (253) 627-4730 SHEET • tT fa 9EE3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '",;_!;J-':""'~"-:-:;~"'f:;;<' ~--:-~ ;;::~"'_ ~~~7 _~~._~ __ . ___ ....--~....--.--It-----'---- ~ (Jj e ~ a:i TRACT 'E' 13 (l::C;-u_ "'!..: (:it.] ~~ -I §g Gj Q III ,.,~i)ifJ.1£~~~_-. b ~ -... ," ~, ,1} .. b ~ et---I .,~si MATCH ""1£ PL STAMP StJ)I FfJIJND /JON IN CA& AT CENTERUNC OF 0AK£3llALE A 1of: e LINE PAGE 6 P.LS. STAMP BC1X ~-;gm;'JV 95.I.~ Flo; PU112fJ E1r« :tu~ • ~ yg Washington State ..,!iait." -, I\r--- b ~ /~ 4 FfJIJND liON IN CA& AT CENTfRUN£ OF OAK£SDAL£ A 11£ .t SW 3+1H ST .1,:" L Z IEl1AND \.:J :-c .... ~\ aN1NJ£S <HSn£ Flo; • sa ~ /) 25 50 100 fEET HUITf -zollARS 302 Sou!h 9th street, Suite 101 Tacama, WSBhingtcn 98402 Fhane (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 ia ['<,j) SHEET 3 <:F '" SHttrS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L"'" '"1::' ~." ".t' . >. ,_ c~_ . -"'<.O';._";'i~;-.' 0.: o "-JN8 ,t a... 2D.58 Cti TRACT 'E' 13 1l:::Ci' u_ "'k: (jlO ~~ -.J (j ~ c;:; o Ctl LOT JJ ;; .... ":.~ .... ~, ,-"~ . ~i" WETLAND & BOUNDARY SURVEY SITE C ... ,.. PL STAMP eax :l~ P.LS. SfAY:" sax .Rag: A.OT IS U ~ 22.'4 ~ -Washington State ';&.1:'. / IIEllANIl CXMlMIES <R5l1£ F'b; .l C ,"4 0-2D.75 + ~ .Jeln.) +0-= n. ,lCW12 =~"'D #ftC2U5 ... +""", Jcrn' ~ C 1m] Eltrrc ZLOS ZI.D1J ~ .JCIII! +0-2U9 +""", J c rn a-ZI.34 Rc;; ..JCiM" -..zr. ... nor#JC ,.. £low :n.ao ~ e""'" PlDTrv aJtrnM.E5 ~ n.u om;nr HUITfZOLLARS 302 Sou!h 9Ih street. Slite 101 Tacama, W~ 98402 Phane (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 ;~ {k~" SHEET • <T ro 9EflS '1 I I 1 I I .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I . '.,; •..... • 0' "lr. FlL£ NAME nME DATE LOT JJ FND. c:r:oc ~ {!lIS1lJIimD) • OF CALC. Ct»IER DESIGNED BY ENTERED BY CHECKED BY PROJ. ENGR. REGIONAL ADM. ) :*th')h:.;.~');';iiW'£;~:,;"",~~~"",,,;c; ' . REVISION ~."," WETLAND & BOUNDARY SURVEY SITE C FI<¥ 1 .a... 24.08 BNSF RR RIGHT OF WAY --=========+-G~Z "" \, 1l:Zf"'1O 160 FE£T CDlflRACT IftJ. l.OCA""" HO. IlAI< DATE I BY PL STAMP BOX P..LS.. STAMP BCfI ~;oi~ ,... 1 4"" 2<05 ""I< FI<¥ 1 r Z4..',5 ~, ~, .. 0-DJa .0-22.50 ~ -W Washington State FI<¥ 1 .U-21.M ~I a... 22." • .--~ HUITf -zollARS 302 SouIh 9th S!Teet &ita 101 Tacana. w~ 98402 Phcne (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 r ..... S>£ET 7 OF I. S>aJ3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "I- G ll~ a II~ ~ -II: ~ II~ II WETLAND & BOUNDARY SURVEY SITE D FWND REBAR 01' CAP 0.111' W 01' o.re" S OF PROPERTY CtJRNER --=======+-G~Z .... , Ii 25 50 --~60 FEET p..£. STAItIP 8CJX DArc 1 IX S 22.50 , 1JD S 22.SJ 1 'JB S 22." P.LS STAMP er:a • 2!1JI5" ~ yg Washington State $42'_ 49..tr_ I MDNIJJIENT NOT FWND. CALClILA TED He CtJRNER OF AOAMS OLe HElD AS CENTffilJNE OF sw 4.JRD ST 5 II! '" ~ ~ ~ w ~-l~~ '-. FWND MDN IN CASC 1 AT INT£RSEC71CIN OF sw 4JRD ST 01' IIE5T VALLEY HWY. HUITI -zoLIARS 302 South 9th Street. SI.ite 101 Taccma. w~ 98402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 S>££T 8 CF 10 9I£E7S • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FILE NAME nME DATE DESIGNED BY £NTERED BY OiECKED BY PROJ. £NCR. REGIONAL ADM. LEGEND m NAlIJRAl GAS VPLVE I!I STORW DRAIN CATCH BASlN C STORW DRAIN C1..EANOUT @ STORW DRAIN MANHOLE STORW DRAIN OUTFAlL PIPE GUARD POST OR SUPPORT POST ~ F1R£ HYDRANT 8 WATER METER Del WATER VPLVE .. WATER IIARI<ER POST .~ SPOT £lEV. ." .~. ~~...:::::-~--~ --=..:::::::-.~-===--- " 1 " " " ,/ " ,/ " , ".\1-- qJ I .. '\ --~-) I \ -",,------I -----1 \ .~. \ I T ..,;" I .~ .... ,/ ,/ \ \ \ ) / I I ;;; .W> .... , /~,/ .~ .'" HORIZONTAL DA TUM .'" TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SITE 0 SIlMH RDI-25.81 1· ~ IE 12" ASS _ 21.91 IE 12" ASS S= 21.91 ~1 ." ..... I SIlIiH RlM= 26.52 IE 112" ASS NW= 23.12 !l IE 8" Il1P E= 22.92 . co· • ~ u~~ .. ~~~ .. s:..1 .~ .V .... ~ ..;'"' ,.,N-: . ., :~~It ("lIZ, Iiri ~ • '" I CI: ~r--I ~~~ J; / ,. Bb~ CO .~ / I g!!!!!! ~ / /~ ~ ~ .W> / I :lI: .~ - ." .'" .4" .'" ." '* r -.--.-OlAlNUNK FENCE HAD 83 / 91 WASHlNGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRAHSPORTATION MONUMENTS. '1386 AND '5278 WA. NORTH STATE Pl»IE PROJa:1lON ~ REVISION VER TICAL DA TUM HAW 88 WASHINCION STATE DEPNmIENT OF TRANSPORTATION MONUMENT '1386 EL<V=52.29 UTILITY NOTE THE UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES I'S!E SHOWN HEREON BY FlEl.D lOCATING SURFACE AP!'URTENANCES. CDNlRACTORS SHALL VERII'Y IHfOIlIIATION R£GARIlIHG THE LOCATION AND SIZES OF AlL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES BUOR£ COUMENCNG CONSTRUCTION. SURVEYOR'S NOTES FlEl.D MAPPING GOUPlETED DECEMBER ~ -JAIIUARY 2D05. AlL UONUWENTS IND1CATEl AS FOUND W£RE VISITED DURING THIS TIME. INSTRUMENT usm GEDDIMETER G-6IlO iUTAl STATION a: TRDIBlE GPS. THIS SURVEY YEETS OR EXCEEDS THE REOU1REYENl5 OF WN:. 332-130-090 ~1 STAl£ 101WASH JOBIfUJIB£R CDIITR.M:T IIC1 """'_ M1 DATE IBY P.£. STAMP etIX OAIF OAlC P.L.S STAJIP eax RJI ffl'AO(S • 1 " --=======+-G~Z '"" , 1 ~ • Washington State o 25 50 tOO IUT HUITT -zoLlARS 302 SouIh 9th Street. &me 101 Tacama, WastWlgtan 98402 Phone (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 SlfiT • " ro SHEEr!i I I ; MATCH LINE RIGHT BOUNDARY SURVEY I FOUND REBAR SITE E AND CAP cur s a a.,," £ OF PROPUiTY , (X)RN£R : I I I I I I I ~~ N01:JO":J7T ..... r; ~~ 83.95 OP-:", ~...,.. -:... ~ I I ~. ~ !"l:Jl ~~ ,l. "'0 -d ~"' V> .... .,'" :;;"' '" '" I - MATCH LINE ABO V£ LEFT I I I - lit F;~ "'d !'O'" :g ... '" ~r ,,~'" ~~ ~ .. PARCEL £ ~ .. f!' I I ,I '-.../ Z '" '- I ; 0 25 50 lOll FEET I S!71:ur:n-W FT1lJND MON IN FOUND MDN IN CAS£" .' CAS£" AT AT CENT£RUNE OF "Z7.99" CENT£RUNE OF ~;~a~ co OAKESD/tl£ :HTH ST I ~ ! A~aSW -.l f OAKESDALE AVE SIff FOUND MON IN CAS£ 41ST ST V---sm=-rt ~ AT CENT£RUNE OF 155«..," ---I 0AKCSlJAL£ A ~ ~ --~ ....... ==-.. -"e[-__ 4¥DIn , 1tJt.2!S" -lJZ.5r '"!! ,I I I ALE NAME HUITT -zoLlARS I nME ~f STAlE DATE 10. I WASH ~ . -.. 302 Sou!h 9th street. &me 101 DESIGNED BY __ Tacoma, Wasti'lgton 98402 SHEET ENTERED BY Phone (253) 627-9131 Fax (253) 627-4730 '0 aw~_1 tDCA""" NQ, Washington State C7 CHECKED BY '0 PROJ. ENGR. QAn-QAn-SHEETS REGIONAL ADM. REVISION DATE BY PI. STAMP 8DX P.LS. STAWP 8DX I 'I I I 'I "~" . .. . .. 1r. . ..". I ~t , , -:~",,-, , '" ' , ,. L.~.;, if CITY OF RENTON " I lUI MEMORANDUM i ,~ MAY - 9 2006 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 9,2006 Plan Review, Fire Keri Weaver x 7382 CITY OF RENTON rlh[ OFr;',f~~ :',,; i!T Harrington Square Site Plan Modification -LUA-05-066 Attached is a proposal fora administrative minor modification of the approved Harrington Square site plan, pursuant to Chapter 4-9-200, subsection J. Please review and provide your comments to me no later than May 23, 2006. , CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WO,RKS MEMORANDUM Date: September 13, 2005 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M. Tucker SUbject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following Information to facilitate project closeout and Indexing by the City Clerk's Office . .. Project Name: Springbrook Wetlands Borings .. LUA (file) Number: LUA-05-066, SME, CAR Cros!i-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Jill (Hall) Ding Acceptance Date: MClY 23, 2005 • Applicant: WSDOT • Owner: WSDOT Contact: Terry Drochak, 1-405 Project Team, WSDOT PID Number: 2523049004; 2523049019; 1253810230; 1253810170; 1253810090; 1253810240; 3623049002 · ERC Decision Date: t:RC AppeClI Date: Administrative Approval: June 6, 2010 Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: DClte Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: · Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The proposal IS for geotechnical bornlngs In the Springbrook wetlands and within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, which are within the Shoreline Management Act jllrlsdlctlon, for the eventllal creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dllg, with 7 of those 12 located within the City's shoreline boundaries. Tile shorl,'lline designation for tile location of these borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program Is Conservancy. Location: Units A ?lnd a are east of Oaksdale Avenue SW and South of SW 27th Street, Unit C Is we!!t of Oakesdale Avenue SW between SW 27th Street and SW 34th Street, Unit 0 Is nortll of 43rd street and east of BNSF right-of-way, and Unit E Is east of Oa~esdale Avenue SW and south of SW 34th Street. Comments: EXEMPTION FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: APPLICANT/CONTACT: PROJECT MANAGER: PROPOSAL: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: SEC-TWN-R: WATER BODYIWETLAND: June 7, 2005 LUA-05-066, SME, CAR Springbrook Wetlands Borings Shoreline Exemption City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Washin~ton State Department of Transportation 600 108 h Avenue NE Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Jill Hall, Associate Planner The applicant is proposing geotechnical bornings in the Springbrook wetlands and within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, which are within the Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction. The borings will provide soil information pertinent to site work for the eventual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 7 of those 12 located within the City's shoreline boundaries. The shoreline designation for the location of these borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program is Conservancy. Units A and B are east of Oaksdale Avenue SW and South of SW 2ih Street, Unit C is west of Oakesdale Avenue SW between SW 2ih Street and SW 34th Street, Unit 0 is north of 43rd Street and east of BNSF right-ot-way, and Unit E is east of Oakesdale Avenue SW and south of SW 34th Street. (See page T02 of Attachment A) 25-23N-4E; NW 1/.1 30-23N-5E; NE 1/.1 36-23N-4E Springbrook Creek, and associated Springbrook Creek wetlands An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described on the attached form for the following reason(s): Exemption from Shoreline Management.doc Site exploration and Investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an application for development authorization under this chapter, if: (i) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of the surface waters; (II) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment including but not limited to fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values; (iii) The activity does not involve the installation of any structure, and upon completion of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity; (iv) A private entity seeking development authorization under this section first posts a performance bond or provides other evidence of financial responsibility to the local Jurisdiction to ensure that the site is restored to preexisting conditions; and (v) The activity is not subject to the permit requirements of RCW 90.58.550. The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT XX Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. N/A Attachments: Attachment A cc: Applicant File Exemption from Shoreline Managamant.doc The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. The Master Program. ~otl., ~~ fiw INAI Wa-ti3 Ne Watts, Director Development Services Division ,. : ,., I' CITY'OF'RENTON' "':' ·'E 'X'E"I\1I, ,'p T,t ,G)t<f;f " FROM CRITICAL'AREAS'REGll~i~~'I'ONS ' , '.' DATE: LAND USE FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: Applicant: PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT LOCATION: ~. ~. '.' :., ..... ," June 7,2005 LUA-05-066, SME, CAR Springbrook Wetlands Borings City of Renton Washington State Department of Transportation Jill Hall, Assoicate Planner Parcels 2523049004, 2523049019, 1253810230, 1253810170, 1253810090, 1253810240, and 3623049002 PROPOSAL: Geotechnical bornings within the Springbrook wetlands for the eventuaJ creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 4 of them being located within wetlands. 3 of the borings will be located within site C (2 borings will be located within the class III wetland and 1 boring will be located within the class" wetland), and 1 boring will be located within the class II wetland on site D. The borings will be drilled using either a truck drill or a track drill. The truck drill will be used when the soil conditions are not soft along the access to the boring locations. The track drill will be used when the soil conditions are soft and are not suitable for the truck drill. When the boring is completed, the boring hole will be back filled with bentonite per Washington State Department of Ecology requirements. The drilling slurry and soil cuttings will be transferred into sealed drums and disposed of off-site. After removing the drill from the boring location, the area will be restored to original condition and, if necessary, native grass seed and straw will be spread over any disturbed areas. . CRITICAL AREA: Springbrook wetlands (Class II and Class III) EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5 Research and Site Investigation of the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby granted for the following reason(s): X Site Investivative Work: Site investigative work necessary for land use application submittals such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests and other related activltes. Investigative work shall not disturb any more than 5 percent (5%) of the critical area and required buffer. In every case, impacts shall be minimized and disturbed areas shall be immediately restored at a 1: 1 ratio. DECISION: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5: H:\Olvision.s\Oevelop.ser\Oev&plan.lng\PROJECTS\05·066.Jill\Sprlngbrook Wetlands Crilical Area Exemption.doc Page 1 of 1 Ii .. '~-.~., .-.-.. ~_.~~O't_ I ---.-.. ---............... -.. ~ i ..... ~_ .. w __ ----':~~'I I • ,... • ..--.~~II: . "!_.,<,,,':'~rlI , ' .' ! DATE: LAND USE FILE NO.: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: Applicant: PROJECT MANAGER: June 7,2005 LUA-05-066, SME, CAR Springbrook Wetlands Borings City of Renton Washington State Department of Transportation Jill Hall, Assoicate Planner , I PROJECT LOCATION: Parcels 2523049004, 2523049019, 1253810230, 1253810170, 1253810090, 1253810240, and 3623049002 PROPOSAL: Geotechnical bornings within the Springbrook wetlands for the eventual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 4 of them being located within wetlands. 3 of the borings will be located within site C (2 borings will be located within the class III wetland and 1 boring will be located within the class II wetland), and 1 boring will be located within the class II wetland on site D. The borings will be drilled using either a truck drill or a track drill. The truck drill will be used when the soil conditions are not soft along the access to the boring locations. The track drill will be used when the soil conditions are soft and are not suitable for the truck drill. When the boring is completed, the boring hole will be back filled with bentonite per Washington State Department of Ecology requirements. The drilling slurry and soil cuttings will be transferred into sealed drums and disposed of off-site. After removing the drill from the boring location, the area will be restored to original condition and, if necessary, native grass seed and straw will be spread over any disturbed areas. CRITICAL AREA: Springbrook wetlands (Class II and Class III) EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5 Research and Site Investigation of the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby granted for the following reason(s): X Site Investivative Work: Site investigative work necessary for land use application submittals such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests and other related activites. Investigative work shall not disturb any more than 5 percent (5%) of the critical area and required buffer. In every case, impacts shoall be minimized and disturbed areas shall be immediately restored at a 1:1 ratio. DECISION: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-050.C.5: H:\Dlvision.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\OS-066.JlIl\Springbrook Wetlands Critical Area Exemption.doc Page 1 of 1 1. The activity is not prohibited by this or any other chapter of the AMC or state or federal law or regulation; 2. The activity will be conducted using best management practices as specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or scientific principles; and, 3. Impacts are minimized and, where applicable, disturbed areas are immediately restored, unless the exemption Is a wetland below the size thresholds pursuant to AMC 4-3- OSO.C.S.f.1 aQd f.2. SIGNATURE: Gregg Zimmerman, Admi Planning/Building/Public EXPIRATION: Five (S) years from the date of approval (signature date). H:\Dlvision.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.lng\PROJECTS\OS-066.JIII\Sprlngbrook Wetlands Critical Area Exemptlon.doc Page 2 of 2 PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M 0 RAN DUM May 31, 2005 Jill Flail MikeDotsonP' Springbrook Wetlands Borings -LUA 05-066, SME, CAR The following Utility and Transportation comments concern the Environmental and Application review for the subject project. EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -These projects site locations are within the e 196 Water Pressure Zone. The static water pressure is approximately 77psi. The sites are outside the Aquifer Protection Area. SE\VER -There are Sewer mains located in this vicinity. SURFACE \VATER -The sites drain to Green River via Springbrook Creek and the Black River Pump Station. STREETS -Public streets SlllTOtll1d the sites. CODE REQUIRKIVIENTS find RECOMENDATIONS I. Utility locates should be required prior to borings; especially at the south end of Site 'D,' adjacent to SW 431'd Street. CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the Department of Ecology Standards and City of Renton staff review and approval. cc: Ronald Straka Kayren Kittrick 1:\1'11111 Rcvicw\Plull Review 20051Wellnnd boring 1405 gF.doclcor City of F m Department of Planning / Building / Public fes ENVIRONMENTAL & DeVELOPMENT APPLICATlvN REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Plan ':AevlfJ..) APPLICATION NO: LUA05-066 SME CAR APPLICANT: WDOT PROJECT TITLE: Springbrook Wetlands Borings SITE AREA: 135.47 acres LOCATION: Springbrook Wetlands COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 6, 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 23 2005 PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Hall PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson BUILDING AREA (Qross): N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77433 f':'t •• n ,,;'fi,:,:, ' , j ,., !:'! r~'l -.; ..•. ' f ..... I~...... /..... :, ~'.'i • : •• Co ., l005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal Is for geotechnical bornlngs In the Springbrook wetlands ~'~~t~tthit,C20cr-'feet of Springbrook Creek. which are within the Shoreline Management Act Jurisdiction. for the eve,ntual creation of the Springbrook 'Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug. with 7 of those 12 located withIn the City's shoreline boundaries. The shoreline designation for the location of these borings according to the Clty's Shoreline Master Program Is Conservancy. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Eloment of the Probable Probable More Elemont of the Probable Probable More Envlronmont Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts NOcOssary Environment Minor Major Informetlon Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air AesthetIcs Water L/(1htIGlare Plants Recreal/on LnncVShoreline Use Utilities AnImals Transoortal/on EnvIronmental Health Public SeNlcos Energy/ Natural Resources Hlstor/clCullural ProseNailon AIrport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS --.--- We have reviewed this ap Icatlon with particular aNent/on 10 those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified sreas of probsble Impact or sress where sddltlonsl 0 t/on Is needed to properly sssess this proposal. ' ~ Data ' City of R9I .. <Jn Department of Planning I Bui/ding I Public h""i<S ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Su. APPLICATION NO: LUA05·066 SME CAR APPLICANT: WDOT PROJECT TITLE: S rin brook Wetlands Borin s SITE AREA: 135.47 acres LOCATION: Springbrook Wetlands COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 6 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 23 2005 PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Hall PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson BUILDING AREA ross: N/A I WORK ORDER NO: 77433 r' '~I ,.-.r ,: 1 ' ": ','1 ", i' I/, I) .1 I. . (" . ,\.,. '"'" SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal Is for geotechnical bornings in the Springbrook wetlands and within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, which are within the Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction, for the eventual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 7. of those 12 located within the City's shoreline boundaries. The shoreline designation for the location of these borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program is Conservancy. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elomont of tho Probablo Probablo Moro Elomont of the Probilble Envlronmont Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Nocossary Envlronmont Minor Impacts Earth ., Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants " Recreation Land/Shoreline Use ~ Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Nalural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservailon Allport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY·RELA TED COMMENTS , lJo-rv- C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS 1/11 Illy ~ta/-UJ &dJll fa ~~ &nll1 @ atJVr/( ~ (Jr bW f.3~ ;1-IN( II b~ ~ Probablo More Major Information Impacts Nocossary We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where allnformatio· neede properly assess this proposal. Date r I City of F m Department of Planning / Building / Public 'ks r ENVIRONMENTAL & !1tEVELOPMENT APPLICAT/l;/N REVIEW SHEET ~ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: l=ttr lr ... <:.. COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 6 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05·066 SME CAR DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 23 2005 APPLICANT: WDOT PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Hall PROJECT TITLE: Springbrook Wetlands Borings PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 135.47 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: Springbrook Wetlands I WORK ORDER NO: 77433 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is for geotechnical bornlngs in the Springbrook wetlands and within 200 feet of Springbrook Creek, which are within the Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction, for the eve,ntual creation of the Springbrook Creek wetland mitigation bank. A total of 12 borings will be dug, with 7 of those 12 located within the City's shoreline boundaries. The shoreline designation for the location of these borings according to the City's Shoreline Master Program is Conservancy. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elomont of tho Probablo Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Mojor Informatfon Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Nocessary E8Ith Houslna Air Aesthetics Water UghtIGlare Plants Recreation land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trensportatlon EIlv(ronmental Health Public Services Energyl Natural Resources HlstoriclCuffural Preservailon Airport Environment 10,OOOFBet 14 000 Feet B. POLICY·RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE·RELATED COMMENTS ~0/lY-J0~(kf//;J ID ~:&J. -~ ...... We have reviewed this application wllh particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas w re additional Information Is needed to property assess this proposal. ", . t·:~R·· .au. . , 1,'_,,' " Knthy'Keolker-Whcieler, Mayor, , May 23, 2005 T erry.o.rochak ,. 1-405. project Te~m. WSDOr , : ·600 108ul 'J\Ven!J8 NE '#405' : Believue;WA 98004' ,',' , . . . 'CITY OF 'RENTON" :' '~lan~n~~ •. _~~giPu~1icWrirks'Dep~~rit,: ' , Gregg'Zlmmer~lIn'P.E.,Adri1lnIStrato,r ",' " ','Subject:: , , ' ,Sp,rlnbrb6kWetlahds, aQrihgs ' " , ,LUA~05~066, S~I?; CAR ," ";--"'. cc:, ' A,lli'son Ray./ Apj:iiicaht ,', . .~. .' ,'. '" : "I, ;~. ',; !' >. '::'. : .~_. ~ .. , " . ). ", , " . \ . ,"', '.' , " ' , , '. " ... " , ., ' .. " 1 055 South Grady W~y -Renton, Washington' 98055 * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30~ post consu~r . AHEAD or T1·iE CTJRV,E ',' I', I -"-'t City of Renton OEVa';f:~Nrp~~ LAND USE PERMIT I.fArf;7::~NG MASTER APPLICATIO~CEIVED PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Geotechnical Borings ADDRESS: 600 1 08th Ave. NE, Suite 405 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Unit A: Southwest of the intersection of SW 2ih St. and CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 Lind Ave. SW Unit B: Southeast of the intersection of SW 2ih St. and TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 456-8500 APPLICANT (If other than owner) SW 34th St. Unit C: West of Oakesdale Ave. SW, between SW 2ih St. and SW 34th St. Unit 0: North of 43rd St., east of BNSF Right-of-Way Unit E: East of Oakesdale Ave. SW, south of SW 34th NAME: Allison Ray St. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): COMPANY (If 1-405 Project, WSDOT UCO applicable): 2523049004,2523049019,1253810230,1253810170, 1253810090,1253810240,3623049002 EXISTING LAND USE(S): ADDRESS: 600 1 08 th Ave. NE, Suite 405 Employment Area -Valley, Conservation Area CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): NI A EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER (425) 456-8500 N/A PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CONTACT PERSON (if applicable): NI A EXISTING ZONING: Exempt NAME: Terry Drochak PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NI A COMPANY (If applicable): 1-405 Project Team SITE AREA (in square feet): NI A ADDRESS: 600 108th Ave. NE, Suite 405 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 N/A TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): N/A (425) 456-8595; terry.drochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NI A Q:web/pw/devscrv/forms/planning/mnsternpp.doc 05/18/05 PRe ~CT INFORMATION continl j -~ NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (If applicable): N/A PROJECT VALUE: Approximately $25,000 NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF N/A ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE (If applicable): BUILDINGS (If applicable): N/A (J AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL (J AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (If applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL (J FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A (J GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL (J HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A -/ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES N/A sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if -/ WETLANDS applicable): N/A N/A sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following Information Included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION _, TOWNSHIP _, RANGE_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. The lega/ description of the site parcels can be found on sheet T02 of the attached drawings. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) ~ l f?--.I\;'-/ , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property Involved In this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers here n contained and the Information herewith are In ali respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. •. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 7f.'lLLf-'I;-"L'~--:-~~~-:,:, k f\ f\~ ~ J ~ signed this Instrument and acknowledged It to be hi e their free and voluntary t for the /1 \ V V \ ~ uses and purposes mentioned In the Instrument. (Signature o~p=tatiV8) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary (Prlnt),_..J.....:...;.J...J:.=L.Io.::.!.J'-+----t:~....:...:....:.._;;....:..._~ My appOintment explres:, __ 3_---L/ ..... 7L.--~tJ::::...~~ __ Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/rnasterapp.doc 05/18/05 j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j , . j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j I j 600 -108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Main 425-456-8500 Fax 425-456-8600 May 18,2005 Ms. Jill Hall City of Renton, Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98055 Re: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SSDP) Exemption and Critical Areas Exemption request for proposed Geotechnical borings to be located within critical areas and the regulated shoreline boundary for Springbrook Creek. Dear Ms. Hall: MS: NB82-250 The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 1-405 Project Team is currently designing the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank, which is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Renton. Additional geotechnical information in the form of geotechnical test borings is required to complete the geotechnical baseline condition and design documents. The geotechnical data collected will be used to assist in the design and development of the Wetland Mitigation Banking Instrument, design and construction plans. A detailed description of the proposed geotechnical boring activity is included with this letter as . Attachment I. Also attached to this letter is a set of drawings that includes a neighborhood detail map, site plan and legal description of the site parcels. The location of each proposed boring within critical areas and the regulated shoreline boundary for Springbrook Creek is described below: ..... • Five geotechnical borings are proposed on Site C. Three of the proposed borings (SBC-I, SBC-4 and SBC-5) are located within an existing City of Renton wetland complex immediately west of Oakesdale Avenue SW. The two remaining geotechnical borings (SBC-2 and SBC-3) are located in uplands outside of critical areas. Though the wetland complex is connected hydrologically, portions of the wetland complex are rated independently per the current Washington State Department of Ecology Wetlands Rating System. The wetland ratings are outlined in the Wetland Delineation Report and required buffers are indicated on the site location drawings (see attached vicinity and site location map sheets 5-8). The proposed boring locations are over 2,000 feet west of the OHWM of T:IEnvironmental (Conidor)IBBJ\Springbrook BBI\PermittinglSpringbrook BEl Geotechnical Roring Mnterial.IOcotechnicnl Boring. SSDP Exemption Roque" Leuer -Renlon -~-16-0~.doc ::r-Washlnoton 810to ." Dopartmont of Transportation Page 2 of6 Springbrook Creek. However, the shoreline zone in this location is designated by the City of Renton as Conservancy Environment and includes all directly associated wetlands adjacent to Springbrook Creek, even though they may extend beyond 200 feet from the OHWM. • Three of the proposed borings (SBD-l, SBD-2 and SBD-3) are located on Site D. Two of the borings are located in uplands in the middle of an existing private dirt/gravel road immediately north of SW 43rd Street. One of those borings (SBD-1) is located 132 feet northwest of the OHWM of Springbrook Creek (see attached vicinity and site location map sheet 9). The shoreline zone in this location is designated by the City of Renton as Urban Environment and extends 200 feet landward from the OHWM of Springbrook Creek. Boring SBD-3 is located in the wetland on site D (see attached vicinity and site location map sheets 9-10) • Four of the proposed borings (SBE-1, SBE-2, SBE-3 and SBE-4) are located on Site E in uplands on a parcel immediately east of Oakesdale Avenue SW. There are no jurisdictional wetlands on Site E, however, borings SBE-1, SBE-2 and SBE-4 are located within 200 feet of the OHWM of Springbrook Creek. Spatially related to Springbrook Creek, boring SBE- 1 is 43 feet northwest of the OHWM, SBE-2 is 148 feet northwest of the OHWM and SBE- 4 is 55 feet northwest of the OHWM (see attached vicinity and site location map sheets 11 and 12). The shoreline zone in this location is designated by the City of Renton as Conservancy Environment and extends 200 feet landward from the OHWM of Springbrook Creek. Since the proposed work is located within critical areas and the regulated shoreline boundary of Springbrook Creek, WSDOT requests a Critical Areas Exemption and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SSDP) Exemption from the City of Renton to perform these geotechnical borings. This proposed geotechnical boring activity constitutes "research and site investigation" and is, therefore, exempt from the standard requirements of the Critical Areas Ordinance per RMC 4-03-050(C)(5)(b)(ii). The proposed geotechnical borings are also exempt from the Shoreline Development Permit process based on RCW 90.58.030(3)(e)(xi), which states that: " ... The following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this chapter: (xi) Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an application for development authorization under this chapter, if: (A) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of the surface waters; (B) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment including, but not limited to, fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values; (C) ll1e activity does not involve the installation of a structure, and upon completion of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity." Page 3 of6 The proposed geotechnical boring activity will not interfere with normal public use of Springbrook Creek. The proposed activity does not involve the installation of a structure, and upon completion <> of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity. The geotechnical borings will have no significant adverse impacts on the environment based on the following: • The time duration of the activity is limited. The twelve total geotechnical borings will be completed in twelve work days. • The number of geotechnical borings within critical areas and shorelines has been minimized to the greatest extent feasible (only 12 total borings, 3 of those are not in shorelines or critical areas). • No trees are anticipated to be removed as a result of the geotechnical boring activities unless unforeseen site conditions arise during onsite operations. • The boring locations are in areas that are easily accessible by the work vehicles. Most of the borings are accessible using existing roads or trails. • The smallest drilling rig capable of accessing each site has been selected to perform the borings. • No structure will be installed as part of this project. • A track mounted geotechnical drill will be used to minimize soil disturbance in boring locations that exhibit soft soil conditions. • Best Management Practices (BMPs) for sediment control will be installed as appropriate prior to the boring occurring and will be removed afterward, all drilling slurry and soil cuttings will be stored in lockable drums and disposed of off-site, and the drilling crew will have at least one emergency spill response kit on site at all times. • Borings have been placed as far away as possible from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of Springbrook Creek. WSDOT has determined that the proposed borings are also exempt from SEPA under WAC 468- 12-800(3), which exempts "Information collection and research, as provided by WAC 197-11- 800( 18), including but not limited to the development, adoption, and revision of transportation plans and six-year construction programs, and any other studies, plans, and programs which lead to proposals which have not yet been approved, adopted, or funded, and which do not commit the transportation department to proceed with the proposals contained therein." Please accept this letter as an official request from WSDOT for an exemption from the standard Critical Areas requirements and a Shorelines Substantial Development Permit for these geoteclmical borings. Thank you in advance for taking the time to process our request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Terry Drochak at (425) 456~8595 or e-mail terry.clrochak@i405.wsdot.wa.gov. Sincerely, Allison Ray ]-405 Project Environmental Manager (425) 456-8610 rayalli@wsdot.wa.gov Attachments: Attachment 1 -Description of Project Activity Attachment 2 -Vicinity Map and Site Plan Drawing Set Page 4 of6 Page 5 of6 Attachment 1: Description of Project Activity A total of twelve geotechnical borings (3 of those are not in shorelines or critical areas) are proposed and will be performed using either a truck drill or a track drill. It is anticipated that five borings will be drilled using a truck drill and seven borings will be drilled using a track drill. A truck drill is essentially a geotechnical drill mounted on a truck. Typically, a truck drill is used when access to the boring location is easy. For this project it is anticipated that borings SBD-I, SBD-2, SBD-3, SBE-I and SBE-2 will be drilled using a truck drill. A track drill is essentially a geotechnical drill mounted on a chassis that contains tracks instead of tires. Typically, a track drill is used when the boring location is located in steep terrain or on soft ground. Utilizing this kind of geotechnical drill minimizes or eliminates rutting in soft soils. For this project it is anticipated that borings SBC-I, SBC-2, SBC-3, SBC-4, SBC-5, SBE-3 and SBE-4 will be drilled using a track drill. Drilling operations will be conducted using a casing advancer system. The casing advancer system is the drilling system used on most WSDOT projects. The drilling operation begins with rotating a 4-inch steel casing into the ground. Then a 3-inch casing is used inside the 4-inch casing to drill the hole. The 4-inch casing is used to re-circulate the drilling slurry in a tub that is placed near the boring hole. Where needed, a silt fence is constructed around the drill location to contain any loss of drilling slurry (drilling slurry is essentially soil mixed with water). Three small groundwater level measuring devices, called a peizometers, will be temporarily installed inside the boring holes of SBC-I, SBC-4 and SBC-5 to collect shallow groundwater level information to assist in the design and development of the Mitigation Banking Instrument, design and construction plans. The peizometer would be removed prior to onsite grading required during the future construction of the Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank. When the boring is completed, the boring hole is backfilled with bentonite per Washington State Department of Ecology requirements. The drilling slurry and soil cuttings are transferred into sealed drums and disposed of off-site. Upon completion of the geotechnical borings, the drill rigs will be removed from the site in the same manner as they were placed. After removing the drill from the boring location, the area will be restored to original condition and, if necessary, native grass seed and straw will be spread over any disturbed areas. All work to be performed is located within sites C, D, and E as indicated on the attached drawing set. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) Actions taken to avoid and minimize potential impacts during geotechnical test borings include the following BMPs: • The time duration of the activity is limited. The twelve total geotechnical borings will be completed in twelve work days. Page 6 of6 • The number of geotechnical borings within critical areas and shorelines has been minimized to the greatest extent feasible (only 12 total borings, 3 of those are not in shorelines or critical areas). • Impacts to site vegetation will be minimized. No trees are anticipated to be removed as a result of the geotechnical boring activities unless unforeseen site conditions arise during onsite operations. • The boring locations are in areas that are easily accessible by the work vehicles. Most of the borings are accessible using existing roads or trails. • The smal1est drilling rig capable of accessing each site has been selected to perform the borings. • No structure will be installed as part of this project. • A track mounted geotechnical drill will be used to minimize soil disturbance in boring locations that exhibit soft soil conditions. • Best Management Practices (BMPs) for sediment control will be installed as appropriate prior to the boring occurring and will be removed afterward, all drilling slurry and soil cuttings will be stored in lockable drums and disposed of off-site, and the drilling crew will have at least one emergency spill response kit on site at al1 times. • Borings have been placed as far away as possible from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of Springbrook Creek. • Drilling slurry will be re-circulated within a closed drilling system and not discharged at the site. • The volume of water for drilling will be minimized. • At no time will drilling slurry or soil cuttings be allowed to enter Waters of the State of Washington. • Sediment control BMPs, such as silt fences, wiJ] be installed as appropriate. • Removal of sediment control BMPs will be performed immediately after drilling has been completed. • Immediately upon completion, boring holes will be filled with bentonite clay to prevent mixing of aquifers and eliminating the route for surface contaminants. · , .NO. MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET 11 on£ p.l. S'~ SIll o LEGEND I:;:--~ --- ~ NOTE. WETlAND BORINC WETlAND BOUNOARIES ON SITES A. BAND C ·CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARy FOR SPRINCBRooK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATIONIRATINC ANO REOUIREO BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUNO IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYINC THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY WI TI GATI ON SI TE SPRINGBROOX CREEK SITE E 12 SllEET OF SMfiTS ,~l<S;~~:'· ,~::S~;,i.~:~ f;- . . , c. DAn .... _._. '\ -.3 . .... ~ .. ~:'\c ... : .. , , ':>: " .. .,. "";;~ LEGEND r.:;;:--~ --- ~ NOTEI VETLAND BORING VETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY fOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE OESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECifiC INfORMATION RELATED TO VETLAND CATEGORIZATION/RATING AND REOUIRED BUfFER WIDTHS MAY BE fOUND IN THE VETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. o 50 100 SCAlE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY M I TI GA T I ON SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE E 11 SHEET OF SHUTS C7> ~ .... .... :z: V) w w V) .... Z ....I :z: u ~ < ~ .NO. DAn: BIll< P.E .. S'''' LEGEND r::--~ --- ~ NOTEI WETLAND BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY 'SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CaEEI. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATION/RATING AND REQUIRED BUFFER wIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. - o 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 VEST VALLEY HIGHVAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MI TIGATION 51 SPRINCBRooK CREEK SITE 0 10 SHUT 0>' SH££T5. -~~:~-. ;~"!~ .. I' '''1 :i. _; \ t"l, --~_~. ~t' I -;'~t?;~~" '.;:'" DAn P.E o .... w w :z: ." w W ." w Z ...J :z: u .... c :::£ LEGEND r::--~ --- ~ NOTE, VERANO BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEl. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATEO BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATECORIZATIONIRATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. ~ .... o 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MIT 1 GA TI ON SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE 0 9 5II££T OF SHUTS 0- ~ lLI lLI X If) lLI lLI If) lLI Z ..J X U t-< ~ •• n P.I:. SoT ... LEGEND I :;;:--~ --- ~ NOTEI VULAND BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNUARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY Of RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETlAND CATEGORIZATIONIRATING AND REOUIRED BUfFER VIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. o 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MIT I GA TI ON SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE C 8 SllUT ~ SHUTS OU£ LEGEND '':--4 --- ~ NOTE. WETLAND BORING WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C COHSgTUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDIRY FOR SPR I NCBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATECORIZATION/RATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WiDTHS WAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPliCATION. 50 100 SCAlE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE C 7 5It££1 ~ SHUTS II> .... L&J L&J :J: VJ L&J L&J VJ L&J Z ~ :J: U .... < :::E .NO. on£ 11 .. BDX q" .... W W :J: VJ L&J W VJ W Z ~ :J: U .... < :::E LEGEND r:;:--~ --- ~ NOTEI VULAND BORING VETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO VETLAND CATEGORIZATIDNIRATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER VIOTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. -~-----a o SO 100 SCAlE J N FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SITE SPRlNGBRODK CREEK SITE C 6 SHEET OF SHUTS MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET 7 PROJ.NO. OArr P.E.51_ UI ~ lL1 lL1 :%: en lL1 lL1 en lL1 Z ...J :%: U ~ < :i LEGEND r:;:--~ ---VETLAND " ~ BORING NOTE. VETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY or RENTDN AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO VETLAND CATEGORIZATION/RATING AND REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. " o 50 100 SCALE I N FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE M HIGHWAY SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE C 5 SHUT OF SHEETS . -~ .I"l'l .,~ .. ~" ... ~ .... "'" '"" . < ... ,,"-, .'" ~". '" ",,7 """" .• '-.,;J.;i:.' ",~,,= ,,,,--.. " .. -. r 7< •• -< ....... ., , .... ""-''''l!'''' .. ~ ~ ~~. '."" .,.l!!$ <-•.... 'k_ .NO. our S1aP aD: LEGEND r::--~ --- ~ NOTE; WETLAND BORING -WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATEO TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATIONIRATING AND REOUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION • o 50 100 SCAlE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY M I TI GA T I ON SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE B 4 SR£ET ~ SH£tTS 0 u: VI ~ilI~~!GilI~~aA ~ Il ~ n "''''-iPlz!iJ~Z-i ~ I: ", > I5lil",Pln-i "' .... I ~ I r-"'~-i"'c",> VI til PI Ln E5EE :::z;: p. :: .... :0 :! ~t:;~ ." 1:" ~ 0 i~!;:::n~~"SID L...J :0 _r-z -nc>-"'''''''0 Z -I'" < ", ~o-l-izn 0 C C" J> PI II:x-"'i>:O-lz IJI -< PI .".,,"'co :D %0 :0 r--i_ ~~ Z:O!(lPl!GPI~ 8 ~J> r-0 n-<~~~:oo:o:o-IJI A J>r--c lil ", ,..--c:.. .... <,.,-",,,, -I ~ -Ir-I -IZ -i->",za", -.... -", -< Jib -PID-OZ-PC Z > n ~-I"'~Z~~!B;~ P Z :0 0-< 0 0 1"'1 l: t.n • % '" :D >0-1 1"'1 Z -"'g~p.l~i'I~!iJ~ ~ l: ~ IIIZ0><0 -< ... VI til -l: xo -1-n PI -!iJ-i~ng~~~~1II -~ u: .... PlZO PlO> 1"'1 ::r: J> ,.. C .... Ifi""'i"'::a .. u: -< -;!-O %. PI IJI ;:\..,~ ~.., ~III J> oA. n-iz> -< ~ ~ -I -:z:,.,z 0 .... -I PI 0 ... > -<III .... Z PI n > 0 0 ./ Z ", 0 m iii ~ UJ iii ... ..... w w :z: In w W In w Z ...J :z: u ..... 0< ~ .NO. DATt P.E. n_ P.E. Sl ... . LEGEND r;:--~ --- ~ NOTEI ItETlAND BORING ItETlAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE THE REGULATORY SHORELINE "BOUNDARY FOR SPRINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIFIC INFORMATION RELATED TO ItETLAND CATECORIZATION/RATING ANO REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS MAY BE FOUND IN THE ItETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION • o 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MITIGATION SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE A 2 $II([T OF SHflTS .., ~ w W :I: VI W W VI -, w Z ...J :I: U ~ '"' ~ MATCH LINE -SEE SHEET 2 DAn LEGEND r=-~ --- ~ NOTE, WETLAND BORINC WETLAND BOUNDARIES ON SITES A. BAND C CONSTITUTE T~E RECULATORY SHORELINE BOUNDARY fOR ~RINGBROOK CREEK. THESE SHORELINES ARE DESIGNATED BY THE CITY Of RENTON AS CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENT. SPECIfiC INfORMATION RELATED TO WETLAND CATEGORIZATIONIRATING AND REOUIREO BUffER WIDTHS MAY BE fOUND IN THE WETLAND REPORT ACCOMPANYING THE SHORELINE EXEMPTION APPLICATION • a 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY MIT 1 GA 11 ON SITE SPRINGBROOK CREEK SITE A SHIEr OJ' 'HUTS LEGAL OESCRH ONS BOUNDARY A: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 577122 THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOIISa LOTS 1. 2. 7 AND 8. BLOCK 6. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME III OF PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, TOGETHER IIITH THAT PORTION OF THE FORMER 20 FOOT RAILROAC RIGHT-OF-WAY. AS OELINEATED ON SAID PLAT ADJOINING SAID LOTS. AS RELINOUISHED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8909110681. BOUNDARY B & C: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 577123 THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE Of WASHINGTON. AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. Sl.!E...Aa ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF GOVERNMENT LOT 11. OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST DUARTER Of THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. IIILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. 'BEGINNING AT A POINT Of THE EAST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10 IN SAID SECTION AT A POINT 255.38 FEET SOUTHERLY. AS MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE. FROM THE SOUTH LINE Of HENRY MEADER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 461 THENCE WESTERLY ON A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE Of THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT-Of-IIAY AT A POINT 289.12 FEET SOUTHERLY. AS MEASUREO ALONG SAIO EASTERLY LINE. FROM SAID SOUTH LINE Of THE OONATION LAND CLAIM AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 60 FEET EAST Of SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY AT A POINT 1.100 FEET NORTH Of THE EAST-IIEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTIONI THENCE SOUTH. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE. TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE Of A TRACT CONVEYED TO BROADACRES. INC. BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7S04010313. SAID POINT BEING 545.6 FEET NORTH Of SAID EAST-WEST CENTERLINE, THENCE EAST. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE Of THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST QUARTER Of SAID SECTION AT A POINT 545.6 FEET NORTH Of SAID EAST-WEST CENTERLINEI THENCE SOUTH. ALONG SAID EAST LINE. TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LONGACRES PARKWAY AS DELINEATED ON THE FACE Of BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 Of PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTONI THENCE SOUTH 87° 57'39" WEST 1.624.00 FEET. WORE OR LESS. TO THE INTERSECTION Of THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION Of THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PROPOSED P-l CHANNEL AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAT. SAID LINE BEING 20.00 FEET. WORE OR LESS. WEST Of THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of LOT 5. BLOCK 9 OF SAID PLATI THENCE SOUTHERLY. ALONG SAID EXTENSION. TO A POINT VHICH BEARS SOUTH 88· 29'29" EAST FROM A POINT BEING MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE Of SAID RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND 2.028.44 FEET NORTH Of THE SOUTH LINE Of SAID SECTION: EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEWHED BY CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY BY KING COUNTY CAUSE NO. 02-2-217S7-5 AND AS RECORDEO UNOER RECORDING NUMBER 200209060012761 TOGETHER WITH ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF GOVERNMENT LOT 9 AND Of THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER Of SECTION 25. TOIfNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 20 FEET WEST Of THE EAST LINE Of GOVERNMENT LOT 9 AND 1.254.20 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINEI THENCE NORTH 88· 24'48" WEST 1.029.43 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT 300 fEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE Of GOVERNMENT LOT 91 THENCE SOUTH I· 01' 49" WEST ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 300 FEET EAST Of THE WEST LINE Of GOVERNMENT LOT 9 AND THE WEST LINE Of THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SECTION 25. 845.23 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 88· 24'48" EAST 1.032.55 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT 20 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER, ' THENCE NORTH O· 49'10" EAST S45.19 FEET TO PLACE Of BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED FOR SOUTHWEST 27TH STREET BY DEED RECORDED UNOER RECORDING NUWSER S2031505161 TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANCE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTONI EXCEPT THE EAST 20 FEET THEREOF, AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE PLAT Of BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RECORDED IN VOLUME 111 Of PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY Of THE FOlLOWING DESCRIBED LINE. BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER WHICH IS 300 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER, THENCE SOUTH 01· ai' 49" WEST. ON ALINE PARALLEL TO AND 300 FEET EAST OF THE WEST UNE Of SAID SOUTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER. TO THE NORTH LINE Of LOT 1. BLOCK 1. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RECORDED IN VOLUME 111 Of PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE, AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWINGa BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 91 THENCE NORTH 81· 21' 3S" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOf A DISTANCE Of 20.01 FEET TO THE WEST LINE Of THE EAST 20 FEET Of SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 9, THENCE SOUTH O· 49' 41" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE Of 1.2S4.20 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY Of RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING,COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 16032506S0, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE Of SAID TRACT Of LAND NORTH 88· 24'17" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.022.32 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 300 FEET EASTERLY OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 9 ANO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAIO PARALLEL LINE NORTH 1° 01' 49" EAST A DISTANCE Of 4So 00 FEETI THENCE NORTH 88· 24'17" WEST A DISTANCE OF 300.01 FEET TO THE WEST LINE Of SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 9, THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE Of THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER Of SAID SECTION 251 SOUTH 1° 01' 49" WEST A DISTANCE Of 90.00 FEETI THENCE SOUTH 88° 24'11" EAST A DISTANCE Of 300.01 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 300 FEET EASTERLY OF THE WEST LINE Of THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER Of SAID SECTION 2S1 THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 01° 07'49" EAST A DISTANCE OF 45 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING. Uli..B. ALL THAT PORTION Of SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANCE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF THE PLAT OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RECORDED IN VOLUME 111 Of PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of LOT 5 IN BLOCK 9 OF SAID PLAT OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON NO. II, THENCE NORTH 88· 32'51" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE Of SAID PLAT. A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION wITH THE EASTERLY LINE Of PROPOSED P-l CHANNELl THENCE NORTH 02· 07'11-EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE Of SAIO CHANNEL PROJECTEO NORTHERLY A OISTANCE Of 1.560.00 FEET. MORE OR LESS. TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH A LINE THAT BEARS NORTH 87· 57' 39" IIEST FROM THE MOST NORTHVESTERLY CORNER OF LONGACRES PARKWAY. AS DEDICATED IN THE PLAT Of BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE Of GOVERNMENT LOT 9 IN THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25, THENCE SOUTH 87· 57'39" EAST. A DISTANCE Of 1.624.00 FEET. WORE OR LESS. TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER Of SAID RIGHT-Of-VAY. SAID POINT AlSO BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 91 THENCE SOUTH 01· 30' 31" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE Of SAID RIGHT-Of-VAY. A DISTANCE OF 1.570.12 fEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE Of BLOCK 9 OF SAID PLAT PROJECTED EASTERLY. SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of THE NORTHWEST OUARTER Of THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER Of SAID SECTION 251 THENCE NORTH 87· 44'27" WEST ALID!~ SAID NORTH LINE. A DISTANCE Of 1.341.99 FEET I ' THENCE NORTH 8· 32'51" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 9. A DISTANCE OF 275.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT Of BEGINNINGI EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOf CONVEYED TO BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD HOlDINGS. INC •• BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUWSER 8911170955. SJ.!E....tJ LOT 7. BLOCK 1. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAl PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RECORDED IN VOlUME 111 OF PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION Of SAID LOT 7 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON fOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8306090101 AND AS CORRECTED BY RECORDING NUMBER 8308050868,TOGETHER WI TH THE WEST HAlF Of THE fORMER 20 FOOT RAILROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY AOJOINING ON THE EAST. AS RELINOUISHED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8909110681. U!t...JlJ THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 6. BLOCK 7. PlAT Of BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RECORDED IN VOLUME III Of PLATS. PAGES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYING NORTH Of THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE.BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 WHICH LIES NORTH 01· 47' 34" EAST 112.52 fEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOfI THENCE NORTH 88· 29'29" WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE Of SAID LOT I. A DISTANCE OF 1.204.25 fEET TO THE EAST LINE Of OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID DESCRIBED LINEITOGETHER WITH THAT HALf Of BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY ADJOINING SAID DESCRIBED PORTION Of LOTS 1 AND 6. AS OUIT-CLAIMED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8909110687; EXCEPT THAT PORTION Of SAID LOT 6. BLOCK 7. CONVEYED TO THE CITY Of RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES By DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8306090101 AND AS CORRECTED BY RECORDING NUMBER 8308050Sfi8;(ALSD KNOIfN AS LOT 1. CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. SHPL-125-89 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9103209006). BOUNDARY 0: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OROER NO. 577124 ~ " EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOf I AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS I BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of SAID 'NORTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHWEST OUARTERI THENCE NORTH 30 fEET, '~ THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE Of SAID SUBDIVISIO~ TO A PONT 20.95 FEET EASTERLY OF EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 'RAILROAD AS 'MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID OLD MAIN LINE TRACT CEKJERLINE AND THE TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID OlD WAIN LINE TRACT CENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF 213.40 FEET, THENCE WESTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID OLD MAIN LINE TRACT CENTERLINE. A DISTANCE Of 20.95 fEET TO A POINT DISTANT 50 fEET EASTERLY. AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID OLD, MAIN LINE TRACT CENTERLINE, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE 50 FEET EASTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGlES TO SAIO OLD MAIN LINE TRACT CENTERLINE. TO A POINT 30 FEET NORTH Of THE SOUTH LINE Of SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE EAST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BOUNOARY E: FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OROER NO. 577125 THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE Of VASHINGTON. AND OESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. LOTS I. 2 AND 4. BLOCK 8. BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON II. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RECORDED IN VOLUME 111 OF PLATS. PACES 42 THROUGH 44. INCLUSIVE. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTONI TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION Of THE FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY AS DELINEATED ON SAID PLAT ADJOINING SAID LOTS. AS RELINOUISHED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 89091106871 EXCEPT THE,NORTH 463.95 FEET Of SAID LOT 4 AS MEASURED ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOf. ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 463.95 FEET Of SAID FORMER RAILROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY AS MEASURED ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOfI AND AlSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 2 DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE CITY Of RENTON RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8306090701 AND CORRECTION THEREOf RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 83080505681 I (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 1. CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-92-090. RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 9206119003). THE LAND REfERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE Of WASHINGTON. AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. THAT PORTION Of THE NORTHEAST OUARTER Of THE NORTHWEST OUARTER Of SECTION 36. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. WILLAMETTE WERIDIAN. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYING EASTERLY Of THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-Of-WAY AND LYING WEST Of THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of HENRY ADAMS DONATION LAND CLAIMa THENCE EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE Of SOUTH 180TH STREET cFORWERLY CORD). 114 FEET, THENCE NORTH 30 fEET TO THE NORTH LINE Of AFORESAID STREET AND THE TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING. THENCE NORTH 644.78 FEETI THENCE NORTHERLY ON A STRAIGHT LINE. PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE Of SAID NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT-Of-WAY. TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 AND THE TERMINUS Of SAID LINEa DATI 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO T02 HIGHWAY Sl!EET OF 5H££TS " AND ~. -~. a 500 .1000 ScALE IN FEET GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES NECESSARY FOR. PREPARAT I ON OF PERIII T APPL I CAT I ON BORING SUMMARY TABLE DATE P.E.51_ ,v I C I N I TY MAP ... 1-405 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY M I 11 GA T I ON SITE TITLE. INDEX & VICINITY MAP T1 SHEET QY SHUTS .-.-......... REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Regulatory Branch Ms. Sharon Wright DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 3785 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124·3755 APR 2 1 2005 Washington State Dept. of Transportation 600 -108 111 Avenue Northeast, Suite 405 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Dear Ms. Wright: Reference: 200500415 Washington State Dept. of Transportation On March 17, 2005, we inspected the property at the Springbrook Creek Mitigation Bank site in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, in response to your request for verification of the boundaries of the wetlands in the project area. The U.S. Anny Corps ofEnginec;:rs has detennined that the delineation depicted in the report "Springbrook Creek Mitigation Site Wetland Delineation Report" dated January 2005, accurately identifies jurisdictional wetlands in the project area. This approved jurisdictional detennination is valid for a period of 5 years from the date of this letter unless new infonnation warrants revision of the detennination. You have the right to appeal this deternlination pursuant to the requirements of the enclosed Administrative Appeal Rule package. Ifappealed, the completed Notification of Administrative Appeal Options and Process and Request for Appeal fonn should be sent to Division Engineer, ATTN: Mores Bergman, Appeal Review Officer, U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers, Northwestern . Division, 12565 West Center Road, Omaha, Nebraska, 68144-3869. If you propose to do any work in the areas identified to be waters of the U.S.,. you should contact our office prior to commencing work to determine pernlit requirements. Jllease note that conducting certain activities in waters of the U.S. without Department. of the Army authorization would violate Federal law. Jfyou have any questions, please contact Kate Stenberg at (206) 764-6912 or via email atKathryn..T.Stenberg@usace.aJmy.mil. Sincerely, ~/d; Michelle Walker, Chief South Application Review Section , . A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the pelinit. (I ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit,document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)' modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the pennit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Pennit, YOll may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Penn iss ion (LOP), you may accept the LOP, and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the pennit. including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • AP~EAL: If you choose to decline the' proffered permit (Standard 01' LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date ofthia notice. ' C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial ofa permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by co~pleting Section IT of this form and sending the form to the diviSion engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: ¥ou may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new infonnation. • ACCEPT: YOll do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved ro. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that YOll accept the approved ro in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved ID. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved ro, you may appeal the approved ro under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be'received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: ¥ou do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide new infonnation for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. (Describe your reasons for appealing decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appel\ant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, additional information to the location of information that in the administrative record. If you have questions renard'inn process you may contact: Kathryn Stenberg, Project Manager U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Post Office Box 3755 Seattle, Washington 98124-3755 Telephone: (206) 764-6912 Mores Bergman, Appeal Review Officer U.s. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Division 12565 West Center Road Omaha, Nebraska 68144-3869 Telephone: (402) 697-2533 ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You wiJI be provided a IS-day notice of site investi and will have the in all site NAO-RFA FORM F.doc 10 April 2000 Date: . Telephone number: Process for Unacceptable Request for Appeal No Division Engineer determines RF A Is unacceptable. (From Appendix A) Review officer returns RFA for applicant to complete. Appendix 0 Yes Yes Division Engineer returns RFA to applicant to revise. Yes Appeal process begins on date of receipt of acceptable Yes RFA. (See Appendix A for process.) Administrative Appeal Process for Approved Jurisdictional Determinations Approved JD valid for 5 years. Yes District makes new approved JD. To continue with appeal process, appellant must revise RFA. See Appendix D. ...... Yes Division engineer or designee remands decision to district, with specific Instructions, for No reconsideration; appeal Yes process completed. Appendix C District Issues approved Jurisdictional Determination \.JD) to applicanUlandowner with NAO. Applicant decides to appeal approved JD. Applicant Bubmlts RFA to division engineer within 60 days of date of NAO. Corps reviews RFA and notifies appellant within 30 days of receipt. Yes Optional JD Appeals Meeting and/or site Investigation . RO reviews record and the division engineer (or designee) renders a decision on the merits of the appeal within 90 days of receipt of an acceptable RFA. District's decision Is upheld; appeal process completed. 'I-....