The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-05-120o O~OO:J83tl ~ ~ , , S 27th st Proposed Akers Farms Annexation _ _ _ City Umils _ Proposed AnneX, Area 4th"· t o 300 l 1 b 1 : 3600 600 ~ J # EFFECTNE DATE: June 18, 2006 CIT ·OFRENTON PlanningIBuildinglPubIic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator CITY CLERK SUBJECT: ADDRESS CHANGES AT 1HE AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION CITY OF RENTON TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: MAY 19 2006 Please note the followingaddiess changes made necessary by the ~ers Fanns Annexation: cny &''jfilR.~egFF1Ce OLDADPRESS 10908SEl64'PI ST W910 SE 164TI1 ST 10818SE 164mS! 10802 SE 164m st 10902 SE 164m ST 10832 si! 164m ST NEW.ADDRESS 1810827mBT . 1814 S 2'UH ST 171()S 27fHST' 1700 S 27TIi ST 1802 S· 27TH'ST 114008 2n1I ST .' .Sincerely, '~. . tL ... : .... ' . .' ,." .' .' . . an Cohldin .' . '. Deveiopinel'lt Servic~.R.epresentative Development Services Departm.ent· Telephone: (425) 430-7276 PARCEL NuMBER 0088000870 . . 0088000870 . 0088000831 0088090810' . , 00880.00851' _ . .1. 0088009850' J. --------------I-05-5-S-oo-ili-iliOO---y-w-~---&-~-t-on-,-W-~-h-i~--oo-9-8-05-5------------~ Il:\ ~. ., .,. --_. . AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: . November 16, 2006 To: City Clerk's Office From: Holly Graber Subject: Land 'Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Prezone of Akers Farm Annexation LUA (file) Number: LUA-05-120, R, ECF Cross-References: AKA's: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone Project Manager: Don Erickson .. Acceptance Date: .. October 13, 2005 Applicant: i City of Renton Owner: --Contact: City of Renton -Don Erickson PID Number: 008800-0810, 0830, 0831, 0850, 0851, 0870 ERC Approval Dat~: November 8, 2005 ERC Appeal Date: November 28, 2005 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to s=ouncil: By Whom: :.;. Council Decision: ,. Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Prezone and environmental review of proposed Akers Farm Annexation area. : Location: 10802 SE 164th St and surrounding area Comments: STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Tom Meagher, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on November 14,2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $98.00. ~~ \\\\UIIII", . ~,,\;'{ L. B ""'-~o~ .. · .. ·· .. ~~~ ~ "')"'J"". ~OT~;",O ~ Tom Meagher S I \ ;z. ~ Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal = CIl f 0 BXp' : i Subscribed and sworn to me this 14th day of November, 2®~ \ 4/28/2009 J ~: ~~\ ~~E ~.~ .... 'ilBuc .... ~ ~ ~ .... O ... -.,...-~ ;:; j "" ~. ",A~~:,"~ '1,., \\~ ~e'I'''''' JodyL. on Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Auburn, Washington PO Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Com- mittee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following pro- ject under the authority ofthe Renton Municipal Code. Akers Farm Annexation Prezone LUA05-l20, A, PZ, ECF Location: The site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by SE l64th to the south. The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this l3-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexa- tions are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.2lC.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the l3-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate + 83 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehen- sive Plan Land Use Map. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Exam- iner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sec- tion 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the King County Journal November 14,2005. #849963 City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~~ , "./OIIPl COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 ( APPLICATION NO: LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED:" APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MA~~ Erika ConklinQ .A PROJECT TITLE: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 13 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): NlA LOCATION: Adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered WORK ORDER NO: 77487 by SE 164th to the South SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the propsed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, puruant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the propsed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the propsed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water UghtlGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services '" Energy/ HistoriclCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whet< ad itional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. horized Representative Date ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Akars Farm Annexation Prezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05·120, A, PZ, ECF LOCATION: The sit. is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and Is bordered by SE 164th to the south. DESCRIPTION: The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezonlng of this 13-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review Is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 13.acre site (excluding str •• t rlght.of.way) could theoretically accommodate + 83 dwelling units. The proposed rezone Is consistent with Renton', Resldantlal Single Family land use designation, as shown on the CIty's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee wtth: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8 .. 110.8. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk'. OffIce, (425) 430.e510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. _ ... FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430·7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when c:alllng for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION I, 04 4. Jor~... , hereby certify that ~ copies of the above document were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE:_\~\/~1L..J4-1-/..l.<:o __ s.:I--_ SIGNED:----lt.!:fJ):...::..~...:..:..-.JC.~~ __ · ___ _ ~ TTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of 'Yrhington residing i j 1~~ ul!} ,on the I~tk dayof f\loJ U>v\ :tw Jw I NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: , . CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 10th day of November, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: ,'iii Name 'i\ Representing Agencies See Attached (Signature of Sender): ~ ~ 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: --------Notary Public in and for the Sate of Washington Notary (Print): _____________________ _ My appointment expires: Project Name: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone Project'if:!umber: LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing ,j .. Dept. of Ecology" Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region" Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor" Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program" 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation" Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. " Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05·120, A, PZ, ECF LOCATION: The site Is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by SE 164th to the south. DESCRIPTION: The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 13·acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R·8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 13·acre site (excluding street right-of·way) could theoretically accommodate + 83 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use deSignation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4·8·110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430·6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. Akers Farms Annexation ZonIngMep FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. -!R.~ 1Iil» ~ -Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor November 10, 2005 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 CITY. RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 8, 2005: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF The site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by SE 164th to the south. The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 13-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 13-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate + 83 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6578. For the Environmental Review Committee, Erika Conkling Associate Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers 'El:;n1i7c<t;loo;;;S'i"iur<'r:.t_ep_h_a_n_ie_~_:_:m_5_:_~_:_:_':_er_:_:_:_:_:_:e_~_:_:_:_t:_nH_, ;_:_:_:h_Ci_:_::_:_:N_9_a~_:_;_5 _______ ~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 300/0 post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Date: To: From: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM November 10, 2005 File Environmental Review Committee Subject: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on November 8, 2005, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable Significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton MuniCipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. ERC Determination Memo 05-120 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 13-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 13-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate + 83 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: The site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by SE 164th to the south. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: November 14, 2005 November 8, 2005 II }f;}()t) Da(e ' 11&;t!:5. ~:) bat~ A XietSCh,Adil1lfstrator EDNSP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE November 8, 2005 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesday, November 8,2005 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Defoor Short Plat (Ding) LUA05-089, SHPL-H, ECF The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 140,723 square foot (3.2 acre) site zoned Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) into 5 lots and an open space tract (Parcel B). The lots are proposed to range in size from 5,500 square feet to 11,574 square feet. The lots are intended for the eventual development of single-family residences. The subject site contains a Class 3 stream, 2 Class 4 streams, a Class 3 wetland, steep slopes, and high coal mine hazard areas. Defoor Preliminary Plat (Ding) LUA05-093, PP, ECF The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 6.91-acre site zoned Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) into 21 lots ranging in size from 5,250 square feet to 8,500 square feet. The lots are intended for the eventual development of single-family residences. The subject site contains a Class 3 stream, 2 Class 4 streams, a Class 3 wetland, steep slopes, and high coal mine hazard areas. Akers Farm Annexation Prezone (Erickson) LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF The applicant has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 13-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 13- acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate ± 83 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Falk /I Annexation Prezone (Erickson) LUA05-121, A, PZ, ECF The applicant has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 6.29-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 6.29- acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate ± 40 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use deSignation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ERC MEETING DATE November 8, 2005 Project Name Applicant File Number Project Manager Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area SITE MAP See below. Project Location Map Akers Farm Annexation Prezone Don Erickson LUA 05-120, A, RZ, ECF Don Erickson The applicant, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed prezoning of this 13-acres annexation site (excluding streets) to Renton R-8. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's proposed zoning the 13-acre site (excluding street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate ± 83 dwelling units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by SE 164th to the south. It is located in the NW 1/4 of Section 29, Township 23 N, Range 5E. N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A 13 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A ERe Report 05-120 City of Renton EDNSP Department AKERS FARM ANNEXATION PREZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 8. 2005 ."" ~I .: .. ""1: " .;:;.- " .. " .. ''-) . C L ( ') Jr ..... , ...... " ".., it} -',:1 0 " 1 (:: + "",'J'~,l .) ':" J "",\ \\ "\ ,(:)J~ , ~-, . .... :./ ... < .. ..... '\_-'- \~" (J) ::: 'j' ":t, ' ...J...J (" t! -..' ... ....-1 'J;, , ',-';;-I: . c::. ',;,-~, L :. Akers Farms Annexation ",!. ERe Report 05-120 ..... '. \, ", . L-V) U >' ~, .. '~oTI C)' ::: ",' Li'II'~ H ~ /t"I~; ..:( , ,,-, Envi '/ " :' ental Review Committee Staff Report LUA-05-J20 A, RZ, ECF Page2of3 .... , ", (0, ':'.,)!' /9 < ;":" ') , , " . ,,' (/1 -'." "D " ", ....... ".,.' S~ ", '~ ~ ;' I ,-, t ~, ........ ,<:-'1:-:'1,..::1 •. J '-""-'_ r--'-:-'---I .. ( . , , 'I " I t (' :::--.r. .~ t L. , ' tll L-V) :~ > -~ ..L .... ) !.J.J :.n (V :-. ':'l ,)1 :..w ::... ... ~I <!,) -: ... <. ~ ).i -;. '15 S: ~'I L C r:: : t) ~ I- V), p: 0"" oCJ.' -L (£j St 15~th St o 6UU 12( iii 7::CH) City of Renton EDNSP Department AKERS FARM ANNEXATION PREZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 8, 2005 B. RECOMMENDATION Envi mtal Review Committee Staff Report LUA-05-120 A, RZ, ECF Page3of3 Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: x DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGA TION MEASURES None required for this non-project action. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following non-project environmental review addresses only those impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action. At the most likely scenario for build-out 83 potential dwellings could potentially create 830 average vehicle trip ends per week day. There are already 5 dwellings and approximately 50 average vehicle trip ends per week day in the area and development of additional units is likely to occur regardless of the change in zoning. However, mitigation can be provided at the time there are specific project proposals before the City. Mitigation Measures: Impacts, if any, are better assessed at the project level. 2. Surface waterl waste water Impacts: Surface water issues have been identified in the area of this proposed prezone. Mitigation Measures: At the time of permitting, future development must comply with either the 2005 King county Surface Water Design Manual Conservation Flow Control Standard and King County Water Quality Treatment Standards, or the City of Renton storm water standards, whichever is stricter. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant . ...L-Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, November 28, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERC Report 05-120 , AKERS FARM ANNEXATION PREZONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 through 4, inclusive, Block 10 of Akers Farms No.6, as recorded in Volume 42, Page 15, records of King County, Washington. All situate in the northeast quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, in King County, Washington. S 27th St Akers Farms Annexation Zoning Map e-Economic Developmen~ Neighborhoods & Slrategic Planning + lID + Alex Pic:Isch, Adminis.--~ G. Del Rosario -ra 22 September 200S - - -City Umits «.'" I R-8 Zoning o I 600 1 : 7200 1200 'I • City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PrDa/t"'''''-...I SlfC2:.., COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-120, A, pi, ECF U DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika ConklinQ PROJECT TITLE: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 13 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: Adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered WORK ORDER NO: 77487 by SE 164th to the South , SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the propsed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, puruant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre: proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the propsed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the propsed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoriclCuitural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Su.rfo.re Jf I. rJ~ COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF' DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PROJECT TITLE: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 13 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): NlA LOCATION: Adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered WORK ORDER NO: 77487 by SE 164th to the South SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the propsed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, puruant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the propsed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the propsed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air ~ Aesthetics Water if Uaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals T ranl;portation Environmental Health Public Services Energyl Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet d 'I£-az-u/46~~ - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or ditional information is neede to ro assess this proposal. Date City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2005 APPLICANT: Ci of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conklin PROJECT TITLE: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone SITE AREA: 13 acres BUILDING AREA LOCATION: Adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered WORK ORDER NO: 77487 b SE 164th to the South SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the propsed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City pt~~§h<J~he subject site in advance of annexation, puruant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with<the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the propsed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the propsed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS J\J~ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \'J.~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or "",as ...... addmonal W""":'tiOO ;5 needed to properly assess th~ """ose}. ~ City of Renton Department of Planning / Bui/ding / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TraMoo1"z.t{}btl COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-120, A, PZ, ~CF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PROJECT TITLE: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 13 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: Adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered WORK ORDER NO: 77487 by SE 164th to the South SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the propsed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, puruant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the propsed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the propsed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water UghtiGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources PreseNation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS W~ c " C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or .,... wh",.._ in~"",,;s needed 1o properly ...... !h1s proposal. I I . Jpn )1Jbf tho ized Representativete ( I City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: H~re COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13, 2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton L"----PROJECT MANAGER: Erika t:n,"kling-;-i;~--' --i"-~-:--- I ~::: ;,~: ) ;1-4 U I i '-..... PROJECT TITLE: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittric ; ,_o::J "' .. -.:' ,- SITE AREA: 13 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A . ' :'1/ !; i i , iji UCT 1 4 2005 : I, LOCATION: Adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered WORK ORDER NO: 77487 i ' I I j by SE 164th to the South I ,r~ i I .~. r: ' -II.I-.... r ~----.J SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the propsed Akers Farm Annexation have r~quested th~ft~ City lprfJzone the subject site in advance of annexation, puruant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at he time tbe.··~~~t;'sitecomes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Resfcfential 5111gle Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the propsed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the propsed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment fO,OOOFeet 14,000 Feet AlA B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or is needed to properly assess this proposal. It j; ~ It? 6" -- Date {' City of Re ..• _n Department of Planning / Building / Public .. _ ... s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Lkn~\91"\ COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 13,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika ConklinQ PROJECT TITLE: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 13 acres BUILDING AREA (Qross): N/A LOCATION: Adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered WORK ORDER NO: 77487 by SE 164th to the South SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the propsed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, puruant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the propsed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the propsed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinq Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional information is neede to properly assess this proposal. · . City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET () .... REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~o..fll6 ~~,.... ~.I COMMENTS DUE: OCTOBER 27, 2005 ~~ g n~ ~AP~P~L~IC~A~T~IO~N~N~O~:~L~U~AO~5~-~12~O~,A~,~P~Z~,=EC~F~ __________ -+_D_A_TE~C_IR~C~U~LA~T~E=D~:_O~C~T~O~B~E=R~1~3~,=200~5 ____ ~~-~Q'T-_-1~ __ ~:~ -< APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling rt:> ~ .;:.. -;:: rnz N"' ..... ~P~R~O~J~E~C~T~T~I~T~L=E~:~A~k=e~ffi~F~a~rm~A~nn~e=x=a~ti~on~P~re=z~o~n=e __________ ~P=LA~N~R~E~V~I=EW~:~K~a~ly~lre=n~K=itt~ri~ck~ ____________ ~<M~3-__ ~~ __ ~4 ~S~IT~E~A~R~E~A~:~1~3~a~cr~e~s __________________________ ~B~U~I=LD~1~N~G~A~R~E~A~(~glro~ss~~)~:~~A~ __________ ~~~Z ____ ~_-___ CJ ell LOCATION: Adjacent to City limits on two sides and is bordered WORK ORDER NO: 77487 by SE 1641h to the South SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the propsed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, puruant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the propsed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the propsed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources PreseNation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS ~. a~ /v{) ~y~A kJ ~L.d C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ~ ~~ Cl/l-L-/l{).~~tz.c/(s ~ /a0l~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dditional information is nee ed to properly assess this proposal. L..- Oat PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING fOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON· SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 13, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA.Q!-120, A, PZ, ECF APPLICATION NAME: AKERS FARM ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants for the proposed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation. pursuant to RCW 35A 14.330, so zoning will be In place at the time the subject site comes Into the City. The City Is proposing to prezone the 13 acte proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation In Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation Is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning Is not. PROJECT LOCATION: this aite Is adjacent to City Umits on two sides and is bordered by SE 164th to the South. It Is located In the NW Y. of Section 29, Township 23 Nt Range 5E. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As Ihe Leed Agency, Ihe City of Renton ha. determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed zoning, Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43,21C,110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS Is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated Into a single comment period, There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-SignifICance (DNS), A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 3, 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 13, 2005 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use; Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Review and Prezone NIA NIA PlanningfBuildinglPublic Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed Direct Petition to annex at its public hearing on August 15, 2005 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed prezonlng on this same date, The subject site I, located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan land Use Map designation, The proposed R-8 prezone is consistent with this land use designation, as well as relevant land use policies adopted In November 2004, Environmental Checklist prepared September 27, 2005 Akers Farms Annexation ZOIIlngMap o i 600 1200 I: 7200 Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate, If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further Information on this proposed project, complete this form and return 10: City of Renlon, Developmenl Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File NolName: LUA-05-120 ,A, pz. ECF Proposed Mitigation Measures: The analysis of the proposal does not revaal any adverse environmental Impacts Akers Fann Annexation Prezonlng requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions, However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site speCific development proposal on the subject annexation site, NAME: ________________________________________________ __ Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Senior Planner, Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on October 27, 2005. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project, ADDRESS: ________________________________________________ __ TELEPHONE NO,: __________________ _ CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 NOTICE OF APPUCATION.doc NOT1CE. OF APPUCAnON.doc CERTIFICATION I, (}U ~ M cStliv -'1 , hereby certify that -3 copies of the above document were posted by me in '-.3 conspicuous places or nearby the described property on SIGNED:-----f.~r:-~=---:.....~· ,c;;:~l...!:....:..:._-__ 7 DATE: /0./« ~OOs:- T: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of W ~ ,onthe_I'--~·_daYOf o~bt-v ~ub ~(' f\K)TARY PUBLIC f' STATE OF WASHINGTON .. COM~1ISSjON EXP!r1ES M;'~H -;0 ., .'_,_. __ ,I. "",·c, ,,-~, •.. !~,";"J ' ,. NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 13th day of October, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing NOA, Environmental Checklist, PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Name ::" RepriseriUng Agencies -NOA, Env. Checklist, PMT's only See Attached Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See Attached (Signature of Sender)I:: ~~~~'I-~si:.~14.:lJ~~-----~Fe;;;tii:F" 'h ;;; F. KOKKO STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 19, 2006 " ,("",",,"," signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ' Dated: {U/28/0( ( I otary Public in and for the Sate of Washington Notary (print):_~C---:" ~::::---.--Y_~-,..-....:....r:----=---i,......:..!!_~_· :f> ______ _ My appointment expires: 3./ {q l~b Project Name: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone Project Number: LUA05-120. A. PZ, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. * c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing 008800087002 ABLEIDINGER ROBERT A 10908 SE 164TH RENTON WA 98055 667305010007 BETTS STEVEN R 2210 JONES PL SE RENTON WA 98055 667306005006 BUTLER AMEO L 2019 SE 22ND PL RENTON WA 98055 667306001005 CUUAK ANTHONY M+SHIRLEY J 1919 SE 22ND PL RENTON WA 98055 008800002506 ,.'\$iJfT(i ~ ~ ELLIS MICHAEL J t,Vf'2.6l tll" 16127 11TH PL SE ) RENTON WA 98055 008800001805 GIBSON MAXWELL E+KATHRYN A 16112 111TH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 667305014009 GROTE JUDITH A 2203 LINCOLN PL SE RENTON WA 98055 202305901805 KING COUNTY 500 KC ADMIN BLDG 500 4TH AV SEATTLE WA 98104 667306002003 KUNNAP TIM+ANN LAN VU 2001 SE 22ND PL RENTON WA 98055 ~9." \2,ft urrte1 / LUTY JAMES M+MARY M' \ \ 1806 FERNDALE AV S. E ( 1'1 \ (1)' RENTON WA 98058 No forlA:la4 .......... ~, ,., .. ,." .. -,,~~---. ...- 008800089305 BASARABA STEVE W 10952 SE 164TH RENTON WA 98055 667306021003 BILLONES BRIAN PATRICK 2008 SE 22ND PL RENTON WA 98055 667305016004 BUTT CHARLES W 29445 232ND AV SE BLACK DIAMOND WA 98010 008800081005 DAU SINH V 10802 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98055 667306004009 ENGIDA FISSEHA B 2013 SE 22ND PL RENTON WA 98055 008800010400 GOMEZ PEDRO 10935 SE 162ND ST RENTON WA 98055 667306006004 HENRIQUEZ MARCOS A 2103 SE 22ND PL RENTON WA 98055 667305021004 A41en.plcr4 tusrtncswn KNITTLE BRIAN D+ THARON L t61~lor 1904 SE 22ND PL RENTON WA 98055 667306003001 LATSCH THOMAS M+BRENDA G 2007 SE 22ND PL RENTON WA 98055 008800089107 MARTIN FRANK LEO 12023 SE 188TH RENTON WA 98055 667305003002 BELO FLOREMIL B 2113 JONES PL SE RENTON WA 98055 008800089008 BOSAIYA sros o5-IW 10936 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98005 667305015006 CHINN TED T 2209 LINCOLN PL SE RENTON WA 98055 008800010608 DEMAN DAN P+NOUANTHONGME BOUTSY 11107 SE 162ND ST #B RENTON WA 98055 667305005007 GALIMBA MARGARITA PERALTA 2209 JONES PL SE RENTON WA 98055-4507 667305017002 GRANT BETTY J 1901 SE 22ND PL KENT WA 98055 008800002407 JENKINS RICHARD A+CAROL A 16119 111TH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 008800002209 KUCHEYNIK VALERIY M 11114 SE 162ND ST RENTON WA 98055 667305009009 LIBED AL A+ELISA NG 2216 JONES PL SE RENTON WA 98055 667306022001 MARTIN PEDRO J 2210 MONTEREY CT SE RENTON WA 98055 · .. ,'. 667305008001 MAZENGIA MULUGETA 2227 JONES PL SE RENTON WA 98055 667306028008 NAVARRO JOSE 0 2211 MONTEREY CT SE RENTON WA 98055 202305912802 NORTHWEST PIPELINE CORP AD VALOREM TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 8900 -MAIL STOP 10453 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 667305007003 MCGUIRE PATRICK E 2221 JONES PL SE RENTON WA 98055 008800002001 NESPER DONALD 16120 l1lTH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 667305006005 OLSON ROBERT H 2215 JONES PL RENTON WA 98055 667305018000 -Mk.n,pkJncJ-t:n~ 667305019008 PETERSON CHARLES A l,J~\(:)~ PIZARRO RUDY A+ARSENIA M 1907 SE 22ND PL ~ 7060 BROWN DERBY CIR RENTON WA 98055 LAS VEGAS NV 89128 292305906102 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON WA 98055 008800002605 SCHREINER MABLE C 16111 l1lTH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 667306020005 SHARIN CHARLES L 2213 ABERDEEN CT SE RENTON WA 98055 008800001607 TURNER SUSAN 0 16101 l1lTH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 667305011005 ZMIRLI A C/O ABDELBARI M 16950 151ST AV SE RENTON WA 98058 008800001706 RESCH WAYNE S 16100 l1lTH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 008800002308 SCHREINER SYLVAN T +CONNIE K 16126 111TH PL SE RENTON WA 98055 008800010301 STEWART ROBERT & LOIS PO BOX 140792 ANCHORAGE AK 99514 667305004000 YAP WILLIAM 4125 ISLAND CREST WY MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 008800010202 NAULT KENNETH E 11105 SE 162ND ST RENTON WA 98055 008800010103 NGUYEN QUANG T 11107 SE 162ND ST RENTON WA 98055 008800083001 OWENS RONALD J PO BOX 58054 RENTON WA 98058 292305912100 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98009 008800010004 RICHARDSON S R 11109 SE 162ND RENTON WA 98055 008800085006 SEQOUIA FRANCISCO BRUAN RUFO & ZENAIDA 2013 EDMONDS DR SE RENTON WA 98055 008800002100 STURTZ 0 0 11104 SE 162ND RENTON WA 98055 008800000500 ZENG CHRISTINA MG PROPERTIES 11300 SORRENTO VALLEY RD 220 SAN DIEGO CA 92121 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON· SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 13, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-Q5-120, A, pz, ECF APPLICATION NAME: AKERS FARM ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants for the proposed Akers Farm Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone the 13 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. PROJECT LOCATION: This site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by SE 164th to the South. It is located in the NW 11. of Section 29, Township 23 N, Range 5E. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-5IGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed zoning. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 3, 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 13, 2005 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Environmental (SEPA) Review and Prezone N/A N/A Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed Direct Petition to annex at its public hearing on August 15, 2005 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed prezoning on this same date. The subject site is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. The proposed R-8 prezone is consistent with this land use designation, as well as relevant land use policies adopted in November 2004. Environmental Checklist prepared September 27,2005 Used For Project Mitigation: This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site specific development proposal on the subject annexation site. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Senior Planner, Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on October 27, 2005. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 NOTICE OF APPLICATION.doc I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJEWUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FIL :NTIFICATION o 600 1200 1 : 7200 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-05-120 , A, PZ, ECF Akers Farm Annexation Prezoning NAME: ______________________________________________________ ___ ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________ __ TELEPHONE NO.: __________________ __ NOTICE OF APPLICATION.doc I Date: To: From: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM October 13, 2005 File Development Planning Subject: Akers Farm Annexation Prezone LUA05-120, A, PZ, ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 8,2005. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Acceptance Memo 05-120.doc ~EVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON City of Renton ( I' OCT 032005 RECEIVED LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: CITY OF RENTON PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Prezoning of the proposed Akers Farm Annexation. ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: NW 114 of Section 29, Township 23 N, Range 5E. North of SE 164th CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 Street, South and West of Renton City Limits. TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6581 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 00880008-10, -30, -31, -50, -51, 70. APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Don Erickson EXISTING LAND USE(S):5 single-family units. COMPANY (if applicable): EDNSP Department PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single family detached housing at densities of eight units per net acre. ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: (RS) Residential Single Family in Renton's Comprehensive Plan CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-6581 (if applicable): RS CONTACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING: King County R-8; 8 units per gross acre PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Renton R-8, 8 units per NAME: net acre. SITE AREA (in square feet): 566,032 ff (13 acres) COMPANY (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING ADDRESS: THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): nla PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (if applicable): Eight DU/ net acre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): nla TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): nla Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp,doc 09/22/05 \. . PROJ :T INFORMA TION (continw NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): nla PROJECT VALUE: nla SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): nla BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): nla SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): nla o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. applicable): nla o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): nla o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. o WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NW114 OF SECTION 29 ,TOWNSHIP 23N ,RANGE 5E ,IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Rezone 3. 2. Environmental Checklist 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postaQe: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Rebecca Lind , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in aU respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Rebecca Lind (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/p\anning/masterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that --::.,...--:--:-_--:---:-...,.-_-,-:-...,.,- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 09/22/05 c o !..... '-----...l----l.. __ ~G S 27th st Akers Farms Annexation Zoning Map - - -City Umils [::=J R·B Zoning o 600 1200 Fcc,cc tgc:c:ccc:::lc:cc:::c:: :::::c:;::::::;~ 1 : 7200 AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT NARRATIVE AND PROPOSAL SUMMARY The applicants for the proposed Akers Farms Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. This site is adjacent to City Limits on two sides and is bordered by SE 164th to the South. Annexation is considered exempt from SEPA. However, the prezoning of the subject 13-acre area does require SEPA review. The City is proposing to prezone the proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed prezone is considered a non-project action under SEP A. Surrounding zoning to the north and west is Renton Renton R-8 residential 8 units per net acre and RMF Residential Multifamily, and King County R-8, residential 8 units per gross acre lies to the east and south. Currently five (5) single-family housing units exist in this area. At full build out it is estimated there will be 83 homes. Since this prezone is a non-project proposal, development of additional housing units will be subject to additional project specific review at the time of development. Akers Farms Annexation Prezone Justification The area proposed for prezoning has already been designated for Residential Single Family in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. King County's Comprehensive Plan has designated the area for urban development at a density of 4-12 dwelling units per gross acre. R-8 zoning of this property would be consistent with both Comprehensive Plans. Renton's zoning uses net developable area to determine project density, not gross developable area. This results in less intensive development adjacent to sensitive areas. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION DEV~\~~~~P' 5NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OCT 03 2005 RECEIVED City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Akers Farms\SEPA Checklist.doc A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Akers Farm Annexation prezone. R-8 prezoning of approximately 13 acres. 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Renton City Hall, dh Floor 1055 South Grad Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact: Don Erickson, Senior Planner Phone: (425) 430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: September 22, 2005 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): NIA non-project action 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NI A non-project action 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NI A non-project action 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farms\SEPA Checklist.doc 2 City Council must give approval of the annexation and zoning. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This non-project action includes pre-zoning approximately 13 acres to R-8 in Renton's Potential Annexation Area currently being considered for annexation using the 60% Direct Petition method. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempted from SEPA. RCW 35.A.14.330- 340 provides for rezoning potential annexation areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. NW 114 of Section 29, Township 23 N, Range 5E. North of SE 164th Street, South and West of Renton City Limits. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ This site is relatively flat with a gentle upward slope from the middle to the east and west. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Approximately 5%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mUCk)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. NIA non-project action d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NIA e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NIA non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farms\SEPA Checklist.doc 3 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NIA non-project action h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NIA non-project action 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. NIA non-project action b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NIA non-project action 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NIA non-project action. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farrns\SEPA Checklist.doc 4 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NIA non-project action 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA non-project action 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 OO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NIA non-project action b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA non-project action 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NI A non-project action c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. NI A non-project action 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NI A non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Fanns\SEP A Checklist.doc 5 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ~ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ~ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ~ shrubs ~ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NIA non-project action c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NIA non-project action 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds. son ther ________ _ Mammals: eer bear, elk, beaver, other _________ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NIA non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farrns\SEPA Checklist.doc 6 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NIA non-project action b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NIA non-project action 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NIA non-project action 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NIA non-project action b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NIA non-project action 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. NIA non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farms\SEPA Checklist.doc 7 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A non-project action 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of this area is primarily for detached single-family residences. There are currently 5 single-family residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are 5 detached single-family residences on this site, some with accessory buildings/garages. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This is a non-project action and it is unlikely that any of the structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County, R-8, 8 units per gross acre. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Renton Residential Single Family g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This is a non-project action. It is expected that at full build out this area would contain 83 single family homes, or approximately 183 persons would reside in the area at full build out. H: \EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Fanns\SEP A Checklist.doc 8 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NIA non-project action k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NIA non-project action I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed pre zoning will help ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. This is a non-project action. Currently there are 5 single-family dweJling units on this site. At full build out this area could contain a maximum of 83 single-family homes. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. NIA non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s}, not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s} proposed. NIA non-project action b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NI A non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NI A non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farrns\SEPA Checklist.doc 9 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NIA non-project action b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NIA non-project action c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NIA non-project action d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? This is a non-project action. The project is more than half a mile away from the nearest City or County park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NIA non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NIA non-project action. Future development would be required to pay Renton's Parks Mitigation Fee. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NIA non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farms\SEPA Checklist.doc 10 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is selVed by SE 164th Street. This is a non-project proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NIA non-project action d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? NIA non-project action. Future development must comply with Renton's Development Regulations. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NIA non-project action f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Assuming the most likely scenario of 83 units at full development it is estimated that there would be approximately 830 A WDTE. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NIA non-project action 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farms\SEPA Checklist.doc 11 NI A non-project action. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NIA non-project action 16. UTILITIES a. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. NI A non-project action c. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Rebecca Lind for City of Renton Date: H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farrns\SEPA Checklist.doc 12 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for ro·ect actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1 . How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? It is unlikely that the proposal would have any affect on the above environmental issues. Additional residential development is likely to occur on this site with or without the proposal. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: New development resulting as a consequence of these proposed amendments would be required to comply with the City's development regUlations, including the City's Critical Areas Ordinance. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? There would be no affect on plants, animals, fish, or marine life as a direct consequence of this non-project, prezoning proposal. There may be some displacement of existing vegetation to clear undeveloped lots for future development, which is likely to occur under the both the present conditions and the proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None at this non-project level. Development of additional dwelling units under this proposal must comply with City of Renton regulations and with Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance. Any measures needed in this regard will be implemented at the project level review. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action will not deplete energy or natural resources. Future project level development may impact energy or natural resources slightly but will not deplete them. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None are proposed at this non-project action stage. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farms\SEPA Checklist.doc 13 This proposal would likely not use or affect environmentally sensitive areas. At such time that additional dwelling units are developed on this site, they will be subject to City of Renton critical area regulations and development standards that are designed to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: NIA. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed prezoning of this area will increase compatibility with the surrounding uses since it will limit future development to single.:.family detached housing currently prevalent in the area. King County zoning allows both detached and attached units in its R-8 zone. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? At current levels of development there are 5 units and approximately 50 AWDVTE in this area. Additional development is likely to occur in this area with or without the proposal. At full development there is a potential for 83 units, or 830 AWDVTE at maximum development. These additional trips are likely to be generated due to the likelihood of development of this area with or without the proposal. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal will not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ~ttt:t6!J4) Name Printed: Rebecca Lind for City of Renton H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Akers Farms\SEPA Checklist.doc 14