HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/14/2010 - Minutes �\
� �
s� �
,�
CITY OF REIdTO1V
City of Renton ocT212o,0
RECEIVEfl
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Board of Park Commissioners �
° � ��00� '�
Meeting Minutes
September 14, 2010
4:30 p.m.
4:30 p.m. — City Hall Conferencing Center-7th floor
I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
In Attendance
The following members were present:
Members: Cynthia Burns, Mike O'Donin, AI Dieckman, Larry Reymann,Tim Searing, Troy
Wigestrand, AI Dieckman
Absent: Ron Regis
Staff: Terry Higashiyama, Sandy Pilat, Leslie Betlach, Kelly Beymer,Terry Flatley, Bonnie
Rerecich,Tim Williams
Guest: Laurie Baker
Chair, AI Dieckman, called the September 14, 2010, meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. Roll
call was taken; Ron Regis was absent. Larry Reymann made a motion seconded by Mike
O'Donin to excuse this absence. All were in favor, motion carried.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A request was made to move Urban Initiative Grant to the first item on the discussion
list. A motion was made by Mike O'Donin and seconded by Cynthia Burns to approve
the agenda as presented. All were in favor, motion carried, the September 14, 2010,
agenda was approved with requested amendment.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Cynthia Burns and seconded by Ron Regis to approve the July
2010 minutes as written, all were in favor, motion carried. (There was not a meeting in
August.)
i
� �
�,
IV. BOARD COMMUNICATION
Chair, AI Dieckman, reported on his and fellow boardmember Cynthia Burns',
participation in the Budget Advisory Committee. They both felt it was an interesting
process and had the opportunity to hear each administrator speak to each of their
expenditure line items. They reviewed potential cuts if warranted. There was
discussion that not only the public sector, but the private sector, as well must look at
ways to operate on less money and more efficiently. One way to accomplish this was to
look at overlap, do we have two employees in different departments doing the same job
(i.e., coordinating volunteers)
V. DISCUSSIONS/ACTION ITEMS
Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Project
Terry Flatley, Urban Forester, gave a brief description of the project and objective. The
Assessment Project will perform an aerial assessment of tree cover utilizing satellite
images of the city. The study will determine the amount of pervious and impervious
surfaces, provide mapping that will distinguish features such as tree canopy, open fields,
water, roof tops, roadways, open space and land classifications. Additionally, it will
provide strategies for increasing canopy cover.
The final product will result in data, maps and a report detailing the assessment with
management objectives, a tool for staff to provide information regarding impacts of
development on the urban forest. This will also demonstrate the value of the canopy
and potential for enhancing those values.
Park Rules and Regulations Update
Kelly Beymer, Parks & Golf Course Director, reviewed a handout of the park rules and
regulations. The highlighted sections were suggested changes to the current rules.
Kelly reviewed each change with the Board and answered questions about the revised
verbiage. Larry Reymann made a motion, seconded by Cynthia Burns to approve the
recommended changes. All were in favor, motion carried.
Neighborhood Program
Terry Higashiyama reported effective January 1, 2011, the Neighborhood Program
would move to Community Services. Currently they have 1.5 employees overseeing this
program and will be working with Bonnie and Sonja.
Surveys
Leslie, Kelly and Tim reviewed surveys made available to the public and the questions
regarding the level of service we provide in our program(s), cleanliness of parks and if
the patrons feel safe. The results of the surveys will be brought forward when
tabulated.
R
' ! �►
►
VI. OLD BUSINESS
Leslie Betlach reported that the company originally awarded the contract to complete
the Parks Plan withdrew due to unforeseen circumstances involving staffing. The
alternate firm was approved September 13, 2010, by Council at a lesser price and will
provide more services.
Kelly Beymer responded to a concern about the cleanliness of the restrooms at Coulon
Park on a hot weekend day. She explained how facilities, recreation and parks would
follow a certain outline on unexpected days that could draw large crowds and require
additional maintenance. With reduced part time staff it is more difficult to attend to
everything. Board member Mike O'Donin commented he liked to see signage stating
that restrooms were closed due to vandalism, so the public is aware of the reason.
II. INF RMATION
V O
Cynthia Burns noted she had not seen any improvement on the trails with the
pedestrians and cyclists. Kelly noted a meeting is scheduled with police, as well as the
bike clubs, and our staff on ways to 'share'the trail. Police have cited a couple people
already and are reminding others of the new rules, to wear helmets etc. There is
apparently an attitude to 'break thru' with the bicyclists as to their rights vs. the
walkers.
Terry noted the Fairwood annexation vote will be November 4. If this passes the
funding and anticipated changes will occur in July of 2011. During this budget process
the Fairwood annexation is being submitted as a separate budget. The vote on Skyway
will not be held until February 2012.
Vlll. ADJOURNMENT
Troy Wigestrand made a motion seconded by Larry Reymann to adjourn the meeting.
All were in favor, motion carried meeting adjourned at 5:49 p.m..
v` f
ig ature
October 19, 2010 @ 4:30 P.M.
Conferencing Center
City Hall --1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA
, • �
Park Rules and Regulations
Authorized by Ordinance No.4419.Amended by Ordinance No.5155.Amended from Ordinance
No.4319 and No. 1476. Resolution No.3555 adopted March 18, 2002; Resolution No. 3751
adopted May 9, 2005. Amended by Ordinance No. 5542 adopted June 28, 2010, Amended bv
Ordinance No. . 2010.
A. General Provisions
Section 1.Prioritv of Use
Programs and activities scheduled by the Community Services Department will have first priority
for use of parks and facilities. Otherwise, use of parks and facilities will be on a"first-come first-
served"basis.
Section 2. Desi4nee of Administrator
The term"Administrator"shall mean the Community Services Administrator. The authority
granted herein to the Administrator is granted to the Administrator's designee.
Section 3. Exemations from Rules and Reaulations
• Rules and Regulations related to possession of Weapons&Fireworks(Section B3)do not
appiy to law enforcement personnel or to persons performing assigned duties as
authorized by the Administrator.
. Rules and Regulations related to Overweight Vehicies in Parks(Section 66)do not apply
to City of Renton maintenance vehicles or emergency vehicles.
• Rules and Regulations related to Wildlife Harassment(Section B7)do not apply to wildlife
control efforts authorized by the Administrator.
• Rules and Regulations related to Domestic Animals in Parks(Section Bii)do not apply to
law enforcement K-9 officers in the conduct of their official duties or to animals used by
independent contractors if required in performance of the contract.
• Rules and Regulations related to Parking and Moorage(Section C10)do not apply to park
maintenance and law enforcement watercraft.
. �tules and Re�ulations related to SCUBA Diving(Section C 9)do not apply to Fire__________...--- Formatted:Highlight
Department personnel or to persons performing rescue operations,or persons
performing assigned duties as authorized by the Administrator.
� �-- --- Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.5", No bullets or
numbering
B. Criminal Violations
Section 1. Postinq of Si4ns
Except as authorized by the Administrator,it is unlawful to use,place or erect any signboard,
sign, billboard,bulletin board, post, pole or device of any kind for advertising in any park;Or t0 Formatted:Font:Calibri,9 pt
I `H/Golf/Mana�er/Park Maint/Rules&Re�s/Park Rules and ReRs 24 Auo 2010 hiRhli�ht for Park
— — — —i .
. • ,
attach any notice bill,poster, sign,wire,rod,or cord to any tree, shrub, railing,post or structure
within any park;or to place or erect in any park,a structure of any kind.
Section 2. Park Closina
Unless otherwise posted, it is unlawful to remain in any park after the posted closing time,except
when engaged in activities, programs or events scheduled by the Community Services
Department.
Section 3. Weapons&Fireworks
Except as otherwise permitted by law,it is unlawful for a person to possess in any park,any
fireworks,firecracker,torpedo,explosive,air gun,sword, knife,bow and arrow(s), BB gun, paint
ball gun,or slingshot.
' It is unlawful for anyperson to possess firearms in anypark except as otherwise permittec_� _ { Formatted_H�9ni�9ht J
— — --- --
18w. (thi5 h85 b22n removed� _ Formatted:Not Strikethrough
�------ —�
Section 4. Alcohol
It is unlawful to possess or consume alcoholic beverages in any park except in areas designated
by the Parks Commission. Designated areas are 1)Maplewood Golf Course,when such beverages
are purchased and consumed within the concessionaire's licensed premises; 2)and designated
areas of the Renton Community Center and Renton Senior Activity Center facilities as part of a
faciliry rental.All activities shall comply with all Washington State Liquor Control Board
requirements.
Section 5. Swimming Areas
It is unlawful for any person to disobey rules,signs or lifelines designating swimming areas.
Swimming shall be permitted only within these areas.All persons using designated swimming
areas shall obey all posted rules and/or the instruction of lifeguards,facility managers,or other
authorized Community Services Department employees. No person shall give or transmit a false
signal or false alarm of drowning.
Section 6. Overweiqht Vehicles in Parks
It is unlawful for any vehicle with a gross weight of over 32,000 pounds or a maximum width of
over 102 inches to use the road in any park of the city except for places set apart for such
purposes by the Parks Commission and designated by signs.
Section 7. Witdlife Feedina&Harassment
It is unlawful in any manner to tease,annoy,disturb, molest, catch,injure or kill,throw any
stone or missile of any kind at or strike with any stick or weapon,any animal, bird, or fowl in any
manner;or to feed any fowl or bird in any park.
Section 8. Concessions,Sales,Commercial Activities.Distribution&Postin4
Pamphlets
It is unlawful to perform the following activities in a park area unless authorized in writing by the
Administrator:
• Operating a fixed or mobile concession,or traveling exhibition. {Formatted•Font:Calibri,9 pt J
I �H/G�iiirvie�ieke�irainrvieiiiiinuic�«ncK�irdinnuiC>oiiVncK�ttiNUKtviViiik���������virarn .
-- — L ,,.
, . �
• Soliciting,selling,ofFering for sale,peddling, hawking,or vending any goods or services.
• Advertising any goods or services other than the direct handing of written advertising to
any one person.
• Conducting classes or organized competitions.
• Distributing any commercial circular notice,leaflet, pamphlet or printed material of any
kind in any Community Services buildings. These facilities are not public forums or
limited public forums and are designated solely to the specific purposes for which they
are dedicated.
. Entering upon,using or traversing any portion of a park for commercial purpose,
including fund raising and/or fund solicitation.
• Attaching or securing to any vehicle or structure any commercial circular notice,leaflet,
pamphlet or printed material of any kind.
Section 9. Water Craft
It is unlawful to have,keep or operate any boat,float,raft or other water craft in or upon any
� bay,lake,slough,river or creek,within the limits of any park,or to la�d the same at any point
upon the shores thereof,except at places set apart for such purposes by the Parks Commission
and so designated by signs.
Speeding on Trails—moved to Civil section____._.___________________ _ ___._._--- Formatted:Highiiqnt
Section 30. Domestic Animals in Parks
It is unlawful to allow or permit any domestic animal,including service animals,to run at large in
any park,or enter any swimming area,pond or fountain therein.A dog brought into or kept in a
park area shall be on a leash not more than eight(8)feet in length. Exceptions to leash
requirements may be made only for approved scheduled events.
. No domestic animals,except for service animals,will be allowed in any park or park
facility that permits swimming.poys�except for_service animals,_are_not_permitted in_____________� Formatted:Hi9nii9hc
either Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, Kennydale Beach Park,or Carco Park Beach.
. Any person with a dog or other pet in their possession in any park shall be responsible
for both the conduct of the animal and for removal from the park of feces deposited by
such animal.The person with the dog or other pet must have in their possession the
equipment or supplies required for feces removal.
• With permission of the Parks Commission,domestic animals,except for service animals,
can be restricted from specific events held at parks or posted areas within a park.
• No domestic animals,except for service animals,will be allowed at the Maplewood Golf
Course.
Section 11. Authoritv to Remove Persons in Parks
It shall be unlawful to stay in a park when directed to leave by an authorized Community
Services Department employee or any police ofFicer.�ursuant_to_RMC 6-30-2,anyperson_________.._---- Formatted:Hignii9nt
violating these Park Rules and Regulations may be subject to Expulsion from all city parks.
,• Formatted:Font:Calibri,9 pt
I H/Golf/ManaRer/Park Maint/Rules&Re�s/Park Rules and ReRs 24 Auz 2010 hi�hli�ht for Park 3_,.-'�
. ------ — -- ----------- ------
— ----------- - -----
� �
Section 12. Vandalism
It is unlawful to remove,destroy, mutilate or deface any structure, monument,statue,vase,
fountain,wali fence, railing,vehicle,bench,shrub,tree,fern, plant,flower,lighting system or
sprinkling system,or other property lawfully in any park.
Section 13. Litterina
It is unlawful to throw or deposit any refuse or other materiai in any park,except in designated
receptacles,or to take garbage or refuse generated outside a park to a park for disposal. ,�t is_____________ Formatted:Hi9nii9nc
unlawful to dump yard waste,litter,debris in any park Failure to remove from the park or
properly dispose of party decorations, including, but not limited to, pinatas,streamers,or
balloons,or picnic items, including, but not limited to, paper or plastic plates or cups or table
coverings,shall constitute littering and is unlawful.
Section 14. Noise Restrictions
All provisions of the Renton Municipal Code,Title 8,Chapter 7,will be strictly enforced, in
particular the following provisions:
• It is unlawful to play car stereos,radios,or"boom boxes"-portable audio equipment,
such as tape or compact disc players-so loudly they interfere with normal conversations
or cause annoying vibrations at a distance of 75 feet or more.
• It is unlawful to operate or use any loudspeaker or other mechanical means of amplifying
sound in any park without a written permit.
Section 15.Conduct
It is unlawful to use abusive,vile, profane,or obscene language or threats,which interfere with
the reasonable use of a park by the general public.
It is unlawful to engage in acts of violence,including but not limited to fights of any kind,or to
act in a violent,threatening, intimidating,or hostile manner toward another person whereby such
person is put in reasonable fear for his/her safety.
5ection i6. Lost Pro�ertv
It is unlawful for any person to fail to turn in any property or objects found on any park premises
to the park staff or directly to the office of the Police Department,at City Hall, Renton,
Washington.The article shall be disposed of in accordance with appiicable City and State Laws.
�ect�on 17. Introduction of Foreinn Matter -- Formatted:Hi nii ht
------------ - - - ---- - - -- - - -- - 9 9
It is unlawful to construct any structure,wail,fence,footing,drive,walk,steps,or path on park
property, or to deposit invasive plants onto park property,or to use or maintain park property as
an extension of private property.
Section 18. Additional Violations
Any violation of state criminal laws or the criminal laws of the City of Renton constitutes a
violation of these Rules and Regulations.
C. Civil Violations
• Formatted:Font:Calibri,9 pt
� �1i�oir r���ia�ertFarr r,=mtir i�_s t�r�, ir�rk r:uie:anJ r.� s t�n��tu���r�r,u-nt tor r�ark 4 — —
, • �
�
Section 1. Activities
It is unlawful in any park to practice or play golf, baseball,cricket,soccer,polo,archery,hockey,
volleyball, badminton or other games of like character,or to fly a kite,or to hurl,propel,or fly
any airborne or other missile,including model airplanes,except in places and times set apart for
such purposes by the Parks Commission.
�Section 2._TI'eil Signs _____ __ __ ________.---- Formatted:Highlight
All trail users must obey all posted trail signs. It is unlawful to disregard or disobey trail signs. It
is not a defense in any proceeding that the trail user did not see the posted sign.
Section 3. Motorized and Non-motorized Vehicles in Parks
Except for wheelchairs,wheeled prosthetics or other wheeled vehicles being used by a disabled
person, it is unlawful to ride,park or drive any bicycle,tricycle, motorcycle, motor vehicle,
skateboard,rollerblades,roller-skates,land sailing device,scooter, unicycles or any other
wheeled or similar vehicle,horse or pony on,over,or through any park designated by signage. It
is unlawful to use the Renton Skate Park at Liberty Park with any device other than a skateboard
or in-line skates.
eSection 4. Motorized Vehicles on Trails ________---- Formatted:Highlighc
--. - - - _- - -- - -- -
It is unlawfui to operate any motorized vehicle on City of Renton trails, EXCEPT those vehicles
used by Community Services Department Personnel in the performance of their assigned duties
or authorized contractors hired by the City in the performance of authorized projects.This
provision does not apply to law enforcement,or Fire Department or other rescue personnel,who
are performing their official duties.
�ect�on 5. Dismount Zones ________________________,._---- Formatted:Hiqhiiyht
-- .------- --� ------ ---- -
Bicycle operators must dismount their bicycle in a"Dismount Zone". Failure to dismount in a
Dismount Zone is a violation of these Rules and Regulations. For purposes of these Rules and
Regulations the Dismount Zones on the Cedar River Trail(Trail)are:
. The Trail between the South East side of the Bronson Way bridge to the North
West side of the Logan Avenue bridge.
• The Trail between North 6th Street and the mouth of the Cedar River at Lake
Washington.
. The Pedestrian Bridge under I-405
For purposes of this Section C 5 the term"dismounY'means:
• The bicycle operator walks on foot alongside the bicycle.
• It is not a dismount if the bicycle operator remains seated on the bicycle seat.
• It is not a dismount if the bicycle operator has either foot on a pedal of the bicycle,
whether or not the bicycle is being propelled by the rotation of the front sprocket.
Formatted:Font:Calibri,9 pt
� H�Golf/Mana�er/f'�rk Pnaint/Ru!es&F.tes�Park Rul�s ani.l E�es 24 Au�2010 hi�h'i�ht for Park �
— -- - - - 5--,-.
� • +
�Section 6. Speedinq on Trails _ _ _ _ __ --- Formatted:Highiighc �
It is unlawful for any person to travel on a trail at a speed in excess of posted speed limits or
greater than is reasonable and prudent under the existing conditions or in disregard for adual
and potential hazards.In every event,speed shall be so controlled as is necessary to avoid
colliding with others using the trail.Travel at speeds in excess of 15 miles per hour on any trail
shall constitute in evidence a prima facie presumption that the person violated this section.
Travel on the Cedar River Trail, i)between 149`h Avenue S.E.and I-405 Termination Point,or ii)
between the NW side of Logan Avenue to North 6`h Street at speeds in excess of 10 miles per
hour shall constitute in evidence a prima facie presumption that the person violated this section.
Section 7. Vehicle Reoair in Parks
Except when authorized in writing by the Administrator,it is unlawful,to operate,repair or
service any motor vehicle or motorcycle on park property for the purpose of testing,servicing or
repairing.
Section 8. Racin4 in Parks
It is unlawful to engage in,conduct or hold any triais or competitions for speed,endurance or hill
climbing involving any vehicle,watercraft,aircraft,or animal in any park without the written
permission of the Administrator.
�SeCt1011 9._SCUBA DlVinq _.___--- Formatted:Highlight
SCUBA diving in areas of boat parking or moorage or at the boat ramp at Gene Coulon Park is
prohibited. Except as may be permitted in writing by the Administrator, SCUBA diving from park
docks or shorelines is prohibited.
Section 10. Campinu and Overniaht Stavs in Parks
It is unlawful to erect a tent or shelter or to arrange bedding,or both,for the purpose of,or in
such a way as will permit remaining overnight. It is aiso unlawful to park a trailer,camper or
other vehicie for the purpose of remaining overnight except when authorized by the
Administrator.
Section li. Fires and Barbecues
It is unlawful to build fires in any park except in areas designed and set aside for such purpose
by the Parks Commission.It is unlawful to use any portabie barbecue over 36 inches in length or
less than 30 inches in height over a combustible surface unless said surface is protected by a
heat shield or fireproof device placed under the barbecue. ,�t_is unlawful to place hot coals onto ._.-- Formatted:Highii9ht
------- — - ---- --- --
park grounds or into any trash containers or water bodies.
Section 12. Metal Detectina
It shall be unlawful to use in any park a device to detect ores or metals except when authorized
in writing by the Administrator.
Section 13. Glass Containers in Parks with Swimmina Areas
It is unlawful to possess any giass container in any portion of the park or park facility that
permits swimming.
Section 14.Group Rallv/Sqecial Use Permit
�Formatted:Font Calibri,9 pt �
� k/Go!f/Ma ta�er P rl.h�,intjf'�.'es&F s�FarK Ru!c,and R��s 24 Au�201G hi�hli r;for Park -
— ---- -- -- - - 6_,.._.
' � �
It is unlawful to conduct any group raliy in a park area or designated facilities where such
activities will conflict in any way with normal park usage.To avoid conflict, permission for such
activities must be obtained in advance from the Administrator.
Special permit required. Groups that desire to use City of Renton facilities may be granted
Special Use Permits by the department, but will be subject to a user fee.Where appropriate,
special conditions of use shall be established by the Community Services Department and so
noted on the Special Use Permits.
Section 15.Parkin4 and Mooraae
• It is unlawful to park in an area designated for a particular recreational activity, unless
participating in that activity.Vehicles parked in violation of this section may be
impounded at owner's expense.
• Boat or watercraft users who are launching at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and
who do not have an annual permit must pay the posted fee on a per use basis.
. It is unlawful to moor any boat or watercraft beyond posted time limits.
• Watercraft moored in violation of this section may be impounded at the owner's expense.
D. Penalties
Section 1.Criminal Violations
� Pursuant toArdinance No._________,.Park Rules and Regulations identified_as criminal violations ..__-- Formatted:Highi�ght ,
herein are punishable pursuant to RMC 6-18-20.
Section 2.Civil Violations
Pursuant to RMC 2-9-6C, Park Rules and Regulations identified as civil violations herein are
punishable pursuant to RMC 1-3-2.
Trail Etiquette
All Users:
. Obey all trail signs and regulations.
• Show courtesy for other trail users at all times.
• Keep dogs on leash,maximum length 8 feet(dogs are not allowed in Gene Coulon Memorial Beach
Park&Kennydale Beach Park).
• When entering or crossing a trail at an uncontrolled point,yield to traffic already on the trail.
• No group of trail users shall occupy more than half of the trail nor impede the normal movement of
trail users. r
• ta to_theri htexce tto ass.______ Formatted:Highlight
� Y 9 P P ------- -------------- — --------- ------- --- l --�
. pass_others�goingyour diredion,on the left. Pass with ample separation and do_not move back to __-- Formatted:Highlight
----------- — - - - -
the right until safely past.
• Use lights at night.
Pedestrians:
Formatted:Font:Calibri,9 pt
H/Golf/Mana�er/Park Maint/Rules&ReRs/Park Rules and Re�s 24 AuR 2010 hiRhli�ht for Park '
� ----- - - --- -- -- -
-- _ 7
� � '
• Listen for audible signals and allow faster trail users to pass safely.
Bicyclists:
• Cydists are required to wear safety helmets on all treils in King County.
• reld to slower and_oncoming_users._.Always give an early audible_(yoice,_beU,horn)warning _ _ { Formatted:Highlight
—•--- --- - - --
before passing another trail user,allowing them adequate time to react.
Fo ttamr ed:Font:Calibri,9 pt
� N r �`t/i .n �:•,rlr'a 4 f .�'�_�? �u ;E:f�, �F d�,_Fi i nd R L-1 l�,u:z 70i0 h'�,eh'i ' �f.�P�r,. g .� "
. -- -- — --- — `
� • i
COMMUNITY SERVICES p ����0� '�� .
DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M '�
DATE: September 14, 2010
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
FROM: Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director
SUBJECT: Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Natural Resources Plan
Attached are two original, partially executed contracts for City execution. All of the
required support documentation is provided along with the Contract Checklist. Please
note, the City has not yet received the original Certificate of Insurance; a copy is
included in the support documentation. The consultant's insurer has assured us that
the original document is in the mail. I will provide the original to the City Clerk's office
upon receipt.
A$50,000 fund transfer is required and was previously authorized by Council on July 19,
2010.
Once the contracts have been executed, please forward a copy to me for transmittal to
the consultant.
If you have questions, please contact me at x-6619.
h:\parks\parks director\planning\parks, rec & open space plan\mig\consultant agreement
final\contract checklist memo 9-14-2011.doc
Commu ' Services De artm� `"'� °�
Y p ;�-� `����
Cus omer Satisfaction Survey �., �.f�R�:` i.
August 23, 2010 — September 12, 2010 '�� '� ��
\���� ,t
� . �:��'
1. Please rate the cleanliness and appearance of Renton's parks and trails system.
Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. What amenities do you use?
❑ Playgrounds ❑ Pool ❑ Other (please list)
❑ Picnic areas ❑ Trails
❑ Swimming beaches ❑ Soccer fields
❑ Ball fields
3. Please rate your satisfaction level with type and range of amenities offered.
Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
4. Do you feel safe using Renton's parks and trails?
❑ Yes ❑ No (If no, where do you not feel safe?)
5. Please rate your satisfaction level with trail connectivity and access to Renton.
Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
6. Please rate your satisfaction level with the distribution (location) of parks in Renton.
Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
7. What open space and natural areas do you visit?
❑ Honey Creek ❑ Cedar River Natural Zone ❑ Other (please list)
❑ May Creek ❑ Springbrook Creek
❑ Black River Riparian Forest
8. Please rate the cleanliness and appearance of Renton's open space and natural areas.
Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
9. Do you feel safe while visiting Renton's open space/natural areas?
❑ Yes ❑ No (If no, where do you not feel safe?)
10. How would you rate the quality of Renton's Right of Way Landscape Maintenance?
Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
11. Do you use Renton's Trails & Bikeways Map?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Please complete remaining questions on the -
reverse side of guestionnaire and return thls survey in _ �, �city of" y�,.
the provided postage paid envelope. — 'r`�����`�'�/��`} '�
Or drop off at: http://Rentonwa.gov
Renton's SeniorActivity Center
211 Burnett Avenue North(425)430-6633 or,
Renton Community Center, 1715 Map/e Valley Hwy(425)430-6700
� �
1. This survey is given annually.
. �
Please contact the Community Services Dept. at (425) 430-6600 with comments, questions, or concerns.
2. Did you know that the Parks Rules & Regulations are located on the City's website?
htpp://rentonwa.gov and click on "living", then click Parks— Parks Rules & Regulations located on left
menu bar.
3. Please remember to call 911 to report dangerous or unwanted behavior.
We welcome your additional comments.
, Henry Moses Aquatic Center S�ey � Page 1 of 3
�i
Henry Moses Aquatic Center 2010
Page 1 of 1
Henry Moses Aquatic Center Survey
Your opinion of the Henry Moses Aquatic Center staff and facility is very important to us. Please complete the
survey below so we may measure our peformance.
1. Overall, please rate your experience at the aquatic center. �
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Great ❑Good ❑Poor ❑No opinion
2. Approximately how many times did you use the aquatic center? *
3. Will you return to the aquatic center next year?*
�Yes U No
4. How did you pay?
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Daily drop-in rate
❑Resident Season Pass
❑Non-resident Season Pass
❑Class Fee (aerobics, swim lessons)
5. What programs did you attend?
Select at least 1 response and no more than 6 responses.
❑Swim Lessons �
❑Public Swims
❑Lap Swims
. ❑Water Walking
❑Water Aerobics
❑Other, piease specify
6. How would you rate the lifeguards?*
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Great ❑Good ❑Poor ❑No opinion
❑Comments
7. How would you rate the front desk staff?*
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Great ❑Good ❑Poor ❑No opinion
❑Comments
8. Did you purchase concessions at the aquatic center?*
http://rentonnet.org/SelectSurveyNET//TakeSurvey.aspx?SurveyID=m4K23o8 9/14/2010
, Henry Moses Aquatic Center Survey • Page 2 of 3
•
�
C�Yes U No
9. How would you rate the Ivar's concession staff?*
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Great ❑Good ❑Poor ❑No opinion
❑Comments
10. How would you rate the variety of food at the concession stand?*
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
, ❑Great ❑Good ❑Poor ❑No opinion
�
❑What other food choices would you like us to consider.
11. How would you rate the cleanliness of the locker rooms?�
' Select at least i response and no more than 1 response.
' ❑Great ❑Good ❑Poor ❑No opinion
❑Comments
12. How would you rate the availability of parking?*
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Great ❑Good ❑Poor ❑No opinion
❑Comments
13. How would you rate the cleanliness of the pool?*
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Great ❑Good ❑Poor ❑No opinion
14. Do you feel the resident policy was understandable?*
Seiect at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Yes ❑No
❑Comments
15. Do you live inside the Renton City limits?
Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Yes ❑No
16. Did you feel the admission process was efficient?*
� Select at least 1 response and no more than 1 response.
❑Yes ❑No
❑Comments
17. What other activities would you like to see at the aquatic center?
http://rentonnet.org/SelectSurveyNET//TakeSurvey.aspx?SurveyID=m4K23o8 9/14/2010
, Henry Moses Aquatic Center Survey Page 3 of 3
� •
�
18. What did you enjoy most at the aquatic center?
19. What did you enjoy least at the aquatic.center?
20. What changes would you recommend at the aquatic center?
Done Cancel
http://rentonnet.org/SelectSurveyNET//TakeSurvey.aspx?SurveyID=m4K23o8 9/14/2010
� • � � 09/13/2010
. _ .. , , .. � ,.x._ � ,. . ,:
�.�'.'fr .3'l:•; `�'` �i �� �'�,+ - F #..
X
�f
r'
� � � � -. ., -4z'
{y� � �'�'�%'y�:. ��`k�1�$.`�'•,."��"r'a�
h ,#�,Yf j ..V � �.`j� ti,.
t � � � � . ^�' � '. r 'f • .
� `'� �.,re•++d'.rr,��+.,�w �, '+r
� � �»: ,�+`+�•
� t
�¢f.
�'� . "�,: . .
. . . , - ,'z �� �t��* � �:`cf.£ c ,.k ��sy�sr � . � � �.
. �' �-�� .. � f ��f ti, . .. .
� . ��;�a�«' ;s;, �t ,; �.�a ��: , . . ' .
� .l�, , •
.
._ ...��, .:.,
. _.��n c�i�i c�n i n :��,�, �:�t t ,�tJ i � �
After a strong 4t" quarter 2009 and a promising 15t quarter,the
recovery slowed to a crawl during the 2nd quarter of 2010.
Growth projections have been repeatedly lowered.
Job growth was insufficient to reduce the unemployment rate.
Housing starts and permits reversed their upward trends.
The risk of double-dip recession has been raised to 25% in
August froml5% in March
, .•F ciiy�>i
_.,._��^�'m'`3*`"� _
1
� • � .
09/13/2010
���:V�t'i U�= � � � `i ,��
` �
Sales Tax: 4.2%below 2009, and 4.5% below budget at the
end ofJune. We anticipate collection to be $17.1 million by
the end the year, which is 4.8%below 2009 actual and 8%
below the$18.6 million budgeted.
Pe-rrnit and Pfan Revi�w �ees: combined permit and plan
review fees is 10%higher than 2009,just slightly beating the
budget at the end of 2nd quarter. Overall we expect these
fees to meet the budget projection for the year.
R�ET; 3%above 2009 and slightly above budget at the end of
June. This positive result is entirely generated in April. The
revenue collection fell off substantially after the expiration of
the Homebuyer Rebate program, and we expect we wifl miss
the budget projection by$200k or 8%for the�,'=r�- -- -
..�'1Y'�x�• .
. � G 7"+l... �..`t,. 1..4� �i: � ,.'\.'t .
Gambiing Tax+es: continuing the downward trend in the past few
quarters, gambling tax collection is expected to see another 5%
or$100,000 drop from the first quarter, for a combined 25%or
$500k less in col�ection than the $2 million budgeted.
t-�ii�t�;�Ta�c��: the $7.6 million revenues collected is 2% below
2009 and right on target with the budget at the end of June. At
this point, we expect the revenue will meet or be very close to
amount budgeted.
{u�art ¢ir��s; Photo enforcement program revenue started to
level off during the first quarter and is 19% below 2009 and 15%
below budget at the end of the second quarter. This is an
improvement from the first quarter and we are trimming the
shortfall from $700k to$400k for the year.
2
• • 09/13/2010
., .�.;�;: ; i�:� : f�i,
At the end of June,the General Fund has a saving of$936k or
1.8%.
Some of the saving is due to lump sum payments due later in
the year, therefore we anticipate oniy about haif of the saving
will be realized.
In addition to department cost savings,the city is discussing
with its bargaining unions on medical premium. The actual
medical and dental premium costs for 2009 came in
substantially less than anticipated,which will result in a
saving to the city's contribution of approximately$700,000 in
2010.
.�°-�•_W"�__ _
. �a . �"�c�N�,�
i -. '._ , , � , t z.
Yr End
Budget Qt 1 Qt 2 Estimate
Beginning FB $ 11,955 $ 11,955
Revenue:
Property Tax $ 31,364 $ - $ - $ 31,364
SalesTax 18,609 (1,400) (50) 17,159
UtilityTaxes 14,228 - - 14,228
GamblingTax 2,000 (400) (100) 1,500
Court Fine 3,577 (700) 400 3,277
Development Fees 2,433 - - 2,433
REET 2,400 - (200) 2,200
OtherGFRevenues 23,228 - (150) 23,078
Total Reve�ue $ 97,839 $ (2,500) $ (100) 5 95,239
Expenditure $ 97,839 $ - $ (1,207) $ 96,632
Ending Fund Balance $ 11,955 $ (2,500) $ 1,107 5 10,562
•�('it}•u(� �,
$in thousands
3
. � -
09/13/2010
`�'�C:#��S ��:s
SALES TAX
��%Chg PY Tax Revenue$
25% $16.0
20% 19%
a,, $14.0
15% 1396
$12.0
109'0 6� 9% �% $10.0
5% ...� � � s�w � �
$8.0
0% nrr � � � c
_5/ -1% 2% $6A �
-5% -5% �
-10% $4.0
-15% $2.0
-15%
-20% 50.0
99 00 O1 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08 09 10
•,..e�'i.f
. _, . . : � I . . � ��+ � `� . i i ' ,. _ ' ,
. . - ,a.:' � ��. -=a -. .
CONSTRUCTION
60% $3.5
50% 48%
r� $3.0
40% 33� 34% 309'0
30� $2.5
20% 12% �':
10% 6% $2.0
� 1� �� !
0% � J .... � ,, $15 �
-10% �
-8% -7%
-20� � $1.0
-30% -24%
50.5
-40%
-50% -39% -3S%
$0.0
99 00 O1 02 03 04 OS 06 07 OS 09 10
...,n:.,,�;�..�.<.___ . . .
'. -City uF �
4
• � 09/13/2010
,,t.,J!'����J�l �','� �.��.,�l��� i 1:� �s� f4�dld �� ��. , �"
AUTOMOTIVE
isi i2i 53.0
11% lp�
10% - . . 7% .... �.,.- .
5y _ $2.5
5% :..> '+,....,. '.''� �4% , .� 3/ � ,.,.
0%
_.,. �. '. . .� . �+ $2.0
� � $1.5 0
-5% 396 3 C g
51.0
-10% . � .. . .
-15% -13% $OS �
-14%
-20% � -18�0� $0.0
99 00 O1 02 03 04 OS 06 07 OS 09 10
_:._,._...._..__._. . .
q.,:y� s Citrof .
_� -� - � .. ., . �, . . . '+.� ' .
�:�
RETAIL/W HOLESALE
40% $6.0
31%
30% 24% $5.0
20% 12% 14%
�� � 10% $4.0
10% , '--...,�f =,.� � _ , . �
Z� $3.0 c
0% , � _
-10% -•� -Z� • $2.0 �
-10%
-20% . . $1.0
-18%
-30% $0.0
99 00 O1 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08 09 10
.,s...�xi.'=--......_�._.
.y w`'�,,,i:�!'I'[yof .
5
� . � .
09/13/?_01 U
:�;����y i� ;�� � � �� .,�� I .� ��' �'�` ; � '
2011 Projection 2012 Projection
Key Revenues: Qt 1 Revised Qt 1 Revised
Property Tax 1.3% 1.3% 1.5% 1.5%
Sales Tax 7.5% 3.5% 6.2% 5.5%
Uti i ity Tax 3.7% 3.7% 4.5% 4.5%
REET 10.0% -10.0'� 0.0% 10.0'�
Liquor Profit* - $(200k) - $(b00k)
Liquor Excise Tax�` - - - $(�k)
Key Expenditures:
Wage 1.0% 2.5%
Pension 46.0% 9.0%
Medica� 8.�% 0.0'� 8.0% 6%
*impact of I-1100& 1105 „,�,;-.<_:: = � �� �
�:a .
� c�t,��t
,�n;. -
GeneralFund Revenue/Exp 2010 2010 YrEnd 2011 2012
(dollars in miilions) Adopted Estimate Projection Projection
General Fund Revenue $ 97.84 $ 95.24 $ 97.80 $ 99.85
%Change from Previous Year 0.5% -2.7% 2.7% 2.1%
General Fund Expenditure $ 97.84 $ 96.63 $ 99.90 $ 100.14
%Change from Previous Year 0.7% -1.2% 3.4% 0.2%
OperatingSurplus(Deficit) $ - $ (1.39) $ (2.10) $ (0.30)
Note:
1. 2011/2012 budget status above does not include any restoration of service reductions made
during 2010 that cannot be sustained.
2. Also not inciuded is funding for parks major maintenance projects with on-going resources
as requested by the Council.
3. With the drop in the REET,the amount availab�e for generai capital needs is extremely
limited. :,;-,._.
.:.;9 " , ��,it1'Uf
6
� • • 09/13/2010
� �� E�hree Tracl�s c�f Bue�g�r t��r����m�;� r
City Service Area Team to review and refine
strategies; identify high level of deliverables and
result measures.
Departments to examine work programs and
program-level performances and deliverables.
The Community Budget Advisory Committee to
review targeted results.
,9 - �`"���}�,r`
..;Jfi"�tE;vi,+ i j �tJ�.i��:`� ,=s�:� ��i�C1��� �._�-:, ,: � ;_ ; �
Met six times since early July.
Reviewed 145 City programs.
Drafting recommendations which would:
Identify community priorities;
Identify areas to review for cost containment opportunities;
and
Recommend areas to examine for long term cost reductions.
,�'. i cc,�,�
" 7
• • 09/13/2010
��`� � . � �
October 18 Administration presents Preliminary
(Regular Council Meeting) Budget
October 20 Council budget workshop
(Special Meeting) • Budget Overview
• Department Presentation
October 25 Council Budget Workshop
November 1 • Department Presentation
November 8(if needed) • Council Deliberation
(Extended Committee of the Wholej
November 15 Public Hearing
(Regular Council Meeting) Ordinance First Reading
November 22 Ordinance Final Reading and Adoption
, -�,e�` � c ic��,i
� .. (�in�ot
V
�
• •
4
Scope of Work- Exhibit A
City of Renton
Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Natural Resources Plan
ONGOING TASKS
Task 0.1: TownsquareT"Project Website
MIG will develop an interactive website using MIG's TownsquareT'"software.This website will be quickly launched and
customized for the project,and will be targeted at project leadership, City staff;and the general public.The project website
will be an important component for engaging the public,key stakeholders and City staff,serving as a repository for project
documents,the host of questionnaire features,a constant venue for public input,and as a notification tool to ensure efficient
and comprehensive information distribution. Documents and deliverables produced throughout the planning process will be
distributed to the Interdepartmental Team and Steering Committee through this website,and they can also submit their
comments.This task includes a one-year subscription to TownsquareT",ongoing website updates, and an initial public
information plan to publicize the website.The subscription fee for Townsquare�"can be prorated for additional months as
needed.
Task 0.2:SunsetArea EIS Coordination
MIG will participate in two in-person meetings associated with the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS.This task also includes
MIG staff time to review materials and integrate recommendations into the PROSNR Plan.
Task 0.3: Ongoing Project Management Team Coordination
MIG will schedule bimonthly coordination calls with the City's Project Management Team to coordinate details of the
project,make decisions, and prepare for meetings.This ongoing coordination will ensure the project remains on track,and will
be supplemented by in-person meetings that occur throughout the project.
Ongoing Tasks Deliverables:
■ 1 year TownsquareT"subscription
■ Attendance at 2 Sunset Area meetings
■ Coordination teleconferences,initially scheduled to occur bimonthly, for 16 month project duration
PHASE 1: WHERE ARE WE NOW?
During Phase 1,the MIG Team will initiate the project, conduct background research,and update the existing conditions
inventory.This phase will provide baseline data for the remainder of the planning process, informing the plan development
that will continue throughout the process.
Task 1.1:Project Initiation Meeting
The MIG Team will meet with the City's Project Manager and key staff at project initiation to refine plans for the project,
including contract administration,roles and responsibilities,schedule details and logistical issues in order to tailor and refine
the planning process. Prior to this meeting,we will provide a Request for Information to the City.We will collect data and
documents at this meeting from the City.After the meeting,MIG will refine and add detail to the timeline/schedule and, if
necessary, to the scope, and provide a PDF file of revisions to the City.
Task 1.2:Purk and Facility Taur
MIG will tour Renton's parks,trails, natural areas, and recreation facilities with planning, recreation, and maintenance staff, as
well as on our own.The tour will provide an opportunity to confirm the Ciry's park and recreation facility inventory and
discuss issues such as operations,planned development, and maintenance.We will also update the parks and facilities
Page 1
' I
• •
t
inventory and evaluate conditions at each site. This tour will be conducted in conjunction with Task 1.1,and a second field
session will occur in conjunction with Task 1.6.
Task 1.3:Data Collection and Review
MIG will review existing documents and background information pertinent to the planning effort, including prior park system
plans,land use plans,the City's Trails and Bikeways Master Plan,and other pertinent documents that set the context for the
PROSNR Plan.
Task 1.4:Base Map and Existing Resource Maps
Using electronic data provided by the Ciry, MIG will produce a GIS base map showing planning areas,existing parks and
natural areas, major recreation facilities,and trails.The base map will also depict school sites and neighboring ciry resources,as
data is available.We assume that Renton is a subscriber to King County's GIS,and can provide this data to MIG. MIG will
produce wall-size and document-size maps for use in the planning process,providing PDF files to the City for review.
Task 1.5:Draft Planning Context Summary Memo
MIG will prepare a Planning Context Summary Memo that documents changes in Renton since the last park system plan,
reviews relevant recent planning efforts and key recommendations,and identifies key issues to address within the planning
effort.The memo will also describe Renton's 10 defined planning areas. MIG will provide a PDF file to the City for
' distribution and review.
Task 1.6.•Interdepartmental Team Meeting�1 �
MIG will meet with the Interdepartmental Team to review the planning context summary memo, further develop the project
contact and stakeholder list, discuss current roles and responsibilities in terms of land stewardship, and discuss key issues and
goals.MIG will provide an agenda,facilitate the meeting, and prepare a summary of key decisions for distribution after the
meeting.
Task 1.7.•Steering Committee Meeting#1
The Long Range Parks, Recreation,Open Space and Natural Resources Plan Steering Committee will serve as the citizen
representatives during the planning process.They will review interim documents and provide a key connection to the broader
communiry.The first meeting will include review of the planning context summary memo; discussion about issues,
opportunities and constraints; and refinement of the project contact and stakeholder list.MIG will provide an agenda,
facilitate the meeting,and prepare a brief ineeting summary.
' Task 1.8:Final Planning Context Summary Memo
MIG will make one revision to the memo based on City-provided consolidated comments
Task 1.9:Recreation Program Inventory
MIG will inventory Renton's major program areas, identifying population served in terms of demographics and program I
locations. If data is available,MIG will document participation,program performance,and staffing level.In addition, MIG i
will include an inventory of program offerings by major non-profits (YMCA, Boys &Girls Club, etc.) in Renton,also by �
major program areas and population served.This information will be used as a baseline for the assessment of program needs.
Task 1.10:NaturalAreas Inventory I
Using aerial photography provided by the City(winter photos preferable),MIG will identify contiguous forested areas in the
City planning area greater than two acres in size.We will incorporate existing land cover data and other existing data ,
identifying wetlands,creeks,watercourses and waterbodies to create a draft natural areas inventory in .SHP file format.We will I
then classify the habitat types (Upland forest:Conifer dominated,Mixed conifer and deciduous, Deciduous dominated;
Wetlands: Emergent, Scrub shrub,Forested, Open water; and Fields/grasslands) based on the aerial photographs and existing ,
data.We will conduct fieldwork to the level of effort shown in the project budget to groundtruth the classifications,with ',
Page 2
J
• � •
t
specific attention given to Cedar River Natural Area,May Creek, Honey Creek, Panther Creek and the Black River Riparian
Forest.We will incorporate the extensive documentation on the Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank.
Task 1.11:Draft Existing Conditions Summary Memo
MIG will prepare an Existing Conditions Summary Memo that describes the system of parks and natural areas in Renton,
incorporating the results of tasks 1.2, 1.4, 1.8 and 1.9. This summary memo will also address the current status of the park
system,present a classification of the park and trail system,and summarize the Ciry inventory of park land, trails,and
recreation facilities.This document will also review current roles and responsibilities for land ownership and stewardship in
Renton,across departments, to provide a foundation for Interdepartmental Stewardship recommendations later in the
planning process. MIG will provide a draft document in PDF format.
Task 1.12:Final Existing Conditions Summary Memo
MIG will revise the drafr document based on consolidated comments provided by the City.
Phase 1 Deliverables:
■ Request for Information letter
■ Refined schedule
■ MIG attendance, facilitation and summary of Project Initiation, Interdepartmental Team and Steering Committee
meetings
■ Draft and Revised Base Map
■ Draft and Final Planning Context Summary Memo
■ Natural Areas Inventory.SHP file
■ Draft and Final Existing Conditions Summary Memo
PHASE 2: WHERE DO WE WANT TO BE?
During Phase 2,MIG will test the department vision, identify community priorities,preferences, and needs for park and
recreation services.We will conduct a variety of communiry engagement activities designed to maximize public input into the
plan,and will incorporate the results of the public outreach into a needs assessment that evaluates and quantifies current and
future park land, recreation facility,programming needs,as well as natural areas/ecosystem services opportunity.
Task 2.1: Community Questionnaire
Working with Ciry staff,MIG will develop a questionnaire(online with a paper version available) designed to collect
information on current use of parks and facilities;perceived recreation program,park and facility needs;and ideas for
improvements to park,connections and natural areas in Renton.The questionnaire will be administered through the
Townsquare'"website.MIG will provide text for email blasts to publicize the questionnaire to the City's project manager, as
well as a questionnaire outreach strategy.The Ciry will be responsible for sending out the email blasts and printing and
collecting paper questionnaires.MIG can provide translation services for the questionnaire and recommends focusing the
multi-lingual outreach on the paper format(internet users tend to be proficient in English).This task includes the cost to
translate the final questionnaire into Spanish and Vietnamese,based on the top two non-English languages spoken in Renton
public schools. If alternative translation options are identified using other city resources, this budget can be applied to the cost
of additional language translations.
MIG will input the data from up to 100 paper questionnaires.At the close of the questionnaire, MIG will tabulate the results
and prepare a summary of key findings. Utilizing the MIG database,this questionnaire will compare recreation activities
against recent communities we have worked with and Renton's past survey results.
Page 3
• � •
t
Task 2.2:Stakeholder Interviews(5)
With City input,MIG will interview five stakeholders in a one-on-one meeting format.The purpose of these sessions is to get
input from key decision-makers or community leaders on key issues, priorities and perceived needs in the provision of
communiry facilities,services and programs.The interviews will focus on how to strengthen partnerships and how to avoid
duplication of services while expanding the quality and quantity of programs and services available to City residents.These
interviews will be scheduled in conjunction with tasks 2.3,2.5>and 2.6.
Task 2.3: Community Meetings(5)
The MIG Team will conduct five meetings, held over four days within two weeks to accommodate evening meetings.
Preliminarily,MIG recommends the meetings include:
■ Two geographically focused meetings aimed at the general public(one in the Renton core,and one targeted at the
areas of Renton annexed within the past 6 years);
■ Two topic area-focused meetings (one targeting natural area advocates and one focused on organized sports/active
recreation);and -
■ One meeting convening key Community Services staff and major Renton area recreation providers.
Task 2.4.•Service Gap and Aecess Analysis
Based on the preliminary analysis of the park,recreation, and natural areas system in Renton,MIG will design a customized
analysis of the service gaps and access to resources.This analysis will be a combination of qualitative inputs from the public
process, quantitative results from a geographic analysis of all opportunities to access parks, trails and recreation facilities, and a
characterization of the natural area inventory based on ecological attributes such as size,maturity, connectiviry and ecosystem
services value such as carbon storage,stormwater attenuation,and wildlife habitat.
Task 2.5:Interdepartmental Team Meeting#2
MIG will meet with the Interdepartmental Team to review and discuss the public involvement results,get feedback on the
service gap and access analysis, and discuss desirable roles in land stewardship. MIG will provide an agenda, facilitate the
meeting,and prepare a summary of key decisions for distribution after the meeting.
Task 2.6.•Joint Parks Commission/Planning Commission Meeting#1
MIG will meet with the Parks Commission and Planning Commission in a joint meeting to review findings to date,discuss
public involvement results,and get direction on the service gap and access analysis.MIG will provide presentation materials,
facilitate the meeting,and prepare a summary of key decisions for distribution after the meeting.
Task 2.7.•Draft Community Needs Assessment
The Communiry Needs Assessment will address the need for park land, recreation facilities,and trails in Renton,as well as
natural area characterization and assessment for greatest value. MIG will analyze and summarize current and future need for
park land, trails and pathways,and natural area lands based on findings from the public involvement process,the existing level
of service, comparable communities, regional and national trends,and geographical analysis.
Task 2.8:Steering Committee Meeting#2
Steering Committee Meeting#2 will occur after the draft Needs Assessment is prepared,providing an opportunity for
Committee members to weigh in on the gap analysis and needs assessment in light of the results of the public involvement
activities. MIG will provide an agenda, facilitate the meeting, and prepare a brief ineeting summary.
Page 4
• • •
.�
Task 2.9: City Council Update#1
MIG will attend a Ciry Council meeting to provide an update on the PROSNR process to date, review the results of the gap
analysis and needs assessment,and get Council direction on moving forward with plan development. MIG will provide
presentation materials, facilitate the meeting, and prepare a summary of key decisions for distribution after the meeting.
Task 2.10:Final Community Needs Assessment
MIG will provide the Final Communiry Needs Assessment based on one set of consolidated comments provided by the City.
Phase 2 Deliverables:
■ Stakeholder Interviews (5) and summary
■ Drafr and Final Community Questionnaire Instrument
■ Programming of Community Questionnaire,Tabulation of Results and Summary Report
■ Community Meetings (5),agendas,presentation materials,and summaries
■ Service Gap and Access Analysis Memo
■ Draft and Final Community Needs Assessment
■ MIG attendance, facilitation and summary of Interdepartmental Project Team and Steering Committee meetings
■ MIG attendance and facilitation of joint Parks Commission/Planning Commission meeting
■ MIG attendance at City Council meeting
PHASE 3: HOW DO WE GET THERE?
During Phase 3,the MIG Team will develop the plan content, including recommendations,strategy,and capital improvement
planning.This phase will also include additional outreach to ensure public and political support for the resulting plan.
Task 3.1:Interdepartmental Team Meeting#3
Using the Needs Assessment and existing departmental vision as a starting point,MIG will facilitate a work session with the
Interdepartmental Team,and potentially additional Ciry staff, to begin to develop goals,strategies,and poliry directions for
the plan.
Task 3.2: Community t/isioning Workshop
The MIG Team will design and facilitate an interactive community workshop to get community input on priorities for
meeting the needs identified in Phase 2 and develop a shared communiry vision for this system. MIG will develop user-
friendly,descriptive materials to engage citizens at the workshop.The outcome of this workshop will include draft vision
statement. Steering Committee members will be encouraged to attend this session.
Task 3.3:Recommendation and Implementation Strategy Development
MIG will prepare a framework of recommendations and strategies addressing the key issues identified in the planning process
and guided by the community vision, incorporating results of the needs assessment and the outcome of Tasks 3.1 and 3.2.
Task 3.4: Community Priority Survey
Drawing from the preliminary recommendation and strategy development,MIG Team member Research Northwest will
execute a scientific telephone survey to validate the direction of the plan, the community vision and key recommendations and
strategies.
For the telephone survey,we propose completion of 500 questionnaires among a random sample of Renton resident
households including cell phone only households,yielding an error margin for the entire sample of less than t 5.0%at a 95%
confidence level,with a questionnaire length of 10 minutes. Sub-area breakdown of these results will be possible, but the
resulting smaller sample as the ciry is divided will result in a higher margin of error.
Page 5
• • '
t
Task 3.5:Decision-Making Tools
Based on the results of the work completed to date,MIG will create custom decision-making tools including prioritization
criteria;capital and operating cost models and design guidelines (with a special focus on shared green infrastructure including
successfully combining stormwater facilities with parks).
Task 3.6.•Interdepartmental Team Meeting#4
At this meeting,MIG will present the results of the community prioriry survey,discuss potential refinements to the draft
recommendations and strategies, and review the decision-making tools.
Task 3.7.•Steering Committee Meeting#3
At this meeting, MIG will present the results of the communiry priority survey,discuss potential refinements to the draft
recommendations and strategies,and review the decision-making tools to get input from the Steering Committee members.
MIG will provide an agenda, facilitate the meeting,and prepare a brief ineeting summary.
Task 3.8: Capital Improvement and Implementation Plan
Based on the input of the Interdepartmental Team, Steering Committee and City Council,MIG will filter the identified
projects and strategies through the decision making tools developed in Task 3.5.The prioritized list will also match existing
and potential funding sources to the highest priority projects,resulting in a clear implementation plan.The outcome of this
task will be reviewed by the Interdepartmental Team and Steering Committee electronically.
Task 3.9:Joint Parks Commission/Planning Commission Meeting#2
MIG will meet with the Parks Commission and Planning Commission in a joint meeting to review the results of the
community prioriry survey, the draft recommendations and strategies, the decision-making tools,and the capital improvement
and implementation plan. MIG will provide presentation materials, facilitate the meeting, and prepare a summary of key
decisions for distribution after the meeting.
Task 3.10: City Council Update#2
MIG will present the results of the planning process to the City Council for discussion. Suggested direction will be
incorporated into the development of the Draft Plan.
Phase 3 Deliverables:
■ Recommendation and Strategy Framework Document
■ Communiry Prioriry Survey instrument,sample, completion and report
■ Communiry Workshop agenda, materials,and summary
■ Decision-Making Tools (Prioritization Criteria, Cost Models, Design Guidelines)
■ Draft Capital Improvement and Implementation Plan
■ MIG attendance, facilitation and summary of Interdepartmental Project Team and Steering Committee meetings
■ MIG attendance and facilitation of joint Parks Commission/Planning Commission meeting
■ MIG attendance at Ciry Council meeting
Page b
.
_,
� �
PHASE 4: PLAN REFINEMENT AND ADOPTION
During Phase 4,MIG will work with Department staff to take the plan through the adoption process, refining the plan based
on input received.
Task 4.1:Draft Conceptual Site Plans
MIG will develop up to 10 conceptual site plans for Renton park sites,diagrammatic in nature to illustrate plan
recommendations.We anticipate these site plans will include five renovations, three undeveloped sites,and two prototypes,
and that half will be large sites and half small sites.
Task 4.2: Community Meetings
MIG will conduct two community meetings,geographically dispersed in Renton, to present the results of the planning process
and get citizen input prior to development of the Draft Plan.
Task 4.3: Comprehensive Plan Policy Review
MIG will review the Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Element of the Renton Comprehensive Plan,including the
Goal, Objectives and 116 Policies and identify where poliry revisions are warranted,given the planning process results.We
assume that the recommended changes will be incorporated as part of the City's regular annual Comprehensive Plan updates.
Task 4.4:Administrative Draft Plan
Based on the work of the previous phases and the input received,MIG will prepare an Administrative Draft Plan for internal
review by the Interdepartmental Team and Steering Committee.The Plan will be formatted as a clear, readable and attractive,
user-friendly document that meets RCO requirements.
Task 4.5:Interdepartmental Team Meeting#5
MIG will review the Administrative Draft Plan with the Interdepartmental Team.
Task 4 6.•Steering Committee Meeting#4
MIG will review the Administrative Drafr Plan with the Steering Committee.
Task 4.7.•Revised Draft Plan
i Based on comments received from the Interdepartmental Team and Steering Committee,MIG will revise the Administrative
Drafr to prepare a Revised Drafr Plan for communiry review.This task includes revisions to the ten conceptual site plans.
Task 4.8:SEPA Checklist,Department of Commerce Notification and RCO Certification
MIG will prepare the Non-Project SEPA checklist and Department of Commerce notification prior to plan approval.MIG
will coordinate with RCO prior to plan approval and completed the RCO self-certification form for signature by the Ciry.
Task 4.9:Joint Parks Commission/Planning Commission Meeting#3
MIG will meet with the Parks Commission and Planning Commission in a joint meeting to review the Draft Plan.MIG will
provide presentation materials, facilitate the meeting,and prepare a memo documenting requested Plan revisions.
Task 4.10: City Council Update#3
MIG will present the draft Plan to the City Council.
Task 4.11:Final Plan
After Council adoption,MIG revise the Draft Plan and deliver a final Plan to the Department. MIG will provide Word and
PDF files of the final Plan to the Department for future use.
Task 4.12:Project Close-Out and Coordination
MIG staffwill complete administrative duties related to the project and the final two months of project management. Close
out of the project will include transferring project files and GIS data to the City.
Page 7
• � •
t
Phase 4 Deliverables:
■ MIG attendance, facilitation and summary of 2 community meetings.
■ Conceptual Site Plans (10)
■ Policy Review
■ Administrative Draft PROSNR Plan
■ Revised Draft PROSNR Plan
■ MIG attendance, facilitation and summary of Interdepartmental Project Team and Steering Committee meetings
■ MIG attendance and facilitation of joint Parks Commission/Planning Commission meeting
■ MIG attendance at Ciry Council meeting
■ SEPA checklist and Department of Commerce Notification
■ RCO Self-Certification
■ Final PROSNR Plan
■ CD of project materials
OPTIONAL TASKS
Optional TaskA:Incorporation ofFairwoodAnnexationArea
The potential Fairwood Annexation Area is excluded from the PROSNR Plan,including public outreach activities and
technical analysis related to this area. Should the City opt to include the Fairwood area within the plan,MIG will work with
staff to develop a budget and scope to accomplish this in a cost-effective and time efficient manner.
Page 8
• i
-� City of � ,Y
� � �, .�,- {1�, ...- ,_r-- .tiA ��;
,? -� � ` � �
�''� �i, � � �4;�
� �,`�.,��) �..��`,�`,�� �..,,� ��:�.vT��
PARKS, RECREATION, OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN
STEERING COMMITTEE
Organization Plan Representative
R2t1t011 SCI100I DIStI'ICt �School Board Member), Citizen AI Talley
Renton Community Services Administrator Terry Higashiyama
Renton Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director Leslie Betlach
Renton Recreation Director Tim Williams
Renton Parks Commission � Tim Searing
Citizen " Julio Amador
Senior Citizens Marge Cochran-Reep
Trails Committee Pete Maas
Arts Commission Britt McKenzie
Chamber Chairman Kirk Merrill
Greater Renton Youth Soccer Assoc. .(vP competit�on) Rich Turner
Renton Little League (President) Chris Hanis
Renton Youth Council Bo Woo
EIIVIPOtII'T1211taI �Renton Parks Commission) Larry Reymann
Renton Community and Economic Development, Planning Vanessa Dolbee
Renton Planning Commission, Member Gwendolyn High
Page 1 of 1
H;IPARKSIParks DirectorlPlanninglParks,Rec&Open Space PIanlSteering CommitteelPks,Rec,Open Space Plan-Steering Committee Rv.2010 Membership.xls
• •
Inter-departmental Team
Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Natural Resources Plan
Team Leads:
Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources, x-6619
Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, x-7314
Team Members:
Karen Bergsvik, Human Services Manager, x-6652
Kelly Beymer, Parks and Golf Director, x-6803
Todd Black, Parks Capital Project Coordinator, x-6571
Kerrt Curry, Commander Police, x-7555
Jennifer Davis Hayes, Community Development Project Manager, x-6589
Terry Flatley, Forestry and Natural Resources Manager, x-6601
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator, x-6606
Lys Hornsby, Utilities Engineering Director, x-7239 (Back up: Ron Straka, Utilities Engineering
Supervisor, x-7248)
Gina Jarvis, Fiscal Services Director, x-6929
Michael Nolan, Facilities Capital Project Coordinator, 6608
Peter Renner, Facilities, x-6605
Bonnie Rerecich, Resource and Funding Manager, x-6624
Jim Seitz,Transportation Planning and Programming Supervisor, x-7245
Kris Stimpson, Recreation Manager, x-6713
Chip Vincent, Planning Director, x-6588
• • � �
Preliminary Project Schedule
zoio Isoii '
. . � . g ...�� r,�r�m�e.... ,;.,�7� �' .� a jyii�-�-�r�. _ t s���y,.._ ' ,; _ __ __ � �`= y.____
�.. ,.-. ;y��� 8 <.:; 3 �. < : yr 'a�" 1:� , �. g.µ j�.
� ' �� "" '� � �k�� a ° ���� :'; y' ^...
_.�..�...m.....,. � .�� � ,,,,,.n , r , ,,,,,,,_ F,' a-�,.,;, N. . :
g
� ,....._.., ,-�........a,.,..._.,.�,.-..« �,_..,..,.,....».......... __._. . ............. ........_...,..,. ..... .�...... ....._ ...._. ...... ........ ...... ...... ... m,.......�., :.. . ...__. ,._ .. ............. ............ ................ ......,....,.....,..._.,........M. .. .._.,_,....,......».....� . _ __.._ :�_.....�
._ ,.,..., .w.,.,m.._.._ t
� 0 ONGOlNGTASKS ; �` ',��?�"�'"a __.,, �._. ..r,.. .. __ _ _ i _.; _ ,.5
��ol I yu P � ��ib...�.-,-m...m m,.�. .. {. _ _ . . ..r.. - ..
i j
_-. __.._.._..._.__�.. ..� . ..__ ,.
g �i � . . ,- _-� Q
� 02 SunemArnL15(.oacd�wcon ._ �_...._. ,. '�._ ... ..._..,.- .. i .. . ._ ��. � ... .. _.. .. � _. _ .. __.
( E 3
!
J - - _ '- ..- , .,......, � . _,,.,..}_ _._ __ ..e . .... -. . ... ..._ _. . .. ,._ _�._ __. �._ . .. ... _� �,_ . _. . . _. .. ... -�
03 iUngoing['ro�eccManagemmcTeamC:oordina�ion . ' ; . . ��.. � : � '
i i �.'�,e.-,_,,,'.»..,.___w ..._ . �,-......-.
+��.w. ���. ... m.�. . . .a.�. >._-
�( � ����/�"��_`��� �� .. _....�..e .-. � .u.w...�-.r.._�.... . .� . .a . .... ... .. ..... ...... .. . ... .
_.._ ..._ .. .._ ,:_. .......�- ._ ..:� ..
[ .:-... . ... yv. �� � _.._...�.._., .. ..._ __ ....._ ......_ . . . . _ _._ _ . ... _ � __ . . ...
[ , __..._,. ._��,....... . . .,...,,._. ...._ ..._ _ ... _ � ' _ . . __ �� _ _� _ .' '.
_�
1 1 � � Cn - M ng � : t � .. _ _ �� 7
- .__ _. _. ' ' .._ i _ _• ;._. ...._. .-•-_ __ _�. ._ � � �_ .. �.. __ �
_ _ �
� ._ _ � T -�- �
i �
` ` ` � . _.. ._ _
�. . . . , _.. ..
� 1 2 I'�rk and Fac�l�ry Tour y�,.. c� �
f _. ...._.. _. .... — . _.�
= 13 �D (;olleawnandReview ..-._. ............._.
� ... . ... _'_ -. T�... _ __ _ '
1 4 B Map and Ex�svng Rewurce Maps �
2- ,.�_.. ._._.'"" ' � 3
£ 1 5 Drafc PIa nmg Conmx�$ F �
E ummary Memo � , . � I
� �� __ —_� �. — —
- _�
E 1 6 I depa I Tcam M dng#1 � ~ i � __ _ ._i
__.___ ._.._.-.__......_..__ ._.. :. �....__.... ._-' ._'_�..."_ � . .__"" '_ —_,
� �17 S�eeringComm�aeeMavnge] � -"' .... _-- - .. . �
'" _ "e..�.e_ - i
1 8 Final Planning Con�ea�Summary Memo � y —' ( ..... ..I
�_ ,_. __ ____
__. .____'. _
-_ ._....� _ j,
� 19 Reanca P g Invrniory �' .-"f ! �
...."'__ ..._..
_. ......_._._..._..._. ._.__� ._. ._ . . ..__
...__.. ....
�. .,_. �.� ._._ ' '
..._ _...._....._._ .
[ 110 NacuralAr I rory . - � � I "___.I _ _._.-;-- .._.._ _._... , --.�
(��1.11 DrehE�l gC d S M1f� m , �_ � � ' -� � i f � �
__
;_ .. ..� .,.
k 1 12 F nil Exis g C J on>S .nfem � , i
(_ ._...... .._�,.....�..--..-... _ _. .. _. .. .. , .._.. _._ .
�
� :, y, � � �,., td'e� �T, -�' :
� �
��,,,"�-DU WE W/4NT TO BE3P ;.�. �«� ., �,•: ..
�, �,
,
� .,
��
_
�
� .� ��.: .`.� ,at::�
N
, ,,
„ r.
.�,, ;� .,r;
.;y .. .. ___. __._..._..�.........,.e a
� � . . .._..._W, �j
..�.� ... .rt�'.�., _...em...�....�.�....d. ___.� ; . :� ,,.
______�_ .. .�__.�. �
� C � ----
� z t comm„„ Q ._. �' . ... .. . .. 1_. -- �-- - �- - .__-
--- - —
2 2 S 6 hold [n�erviews(5) �� _ ' '
r 2 3 C mun�ry Meeungs CS) . - . - ... �� —..+— ' __ �- _ _ J - ' ' — _
_.....__ .. �
g _ ._.....—_ ` � . � � 4 _ �- t � I - --
�- — - - 7 - -� - i- -- --- � 3
� 2.4 Service Gap and Access Malysis � .� .I � . . I � ��. � [.- _
i � s I i
:.� _.._. — . (.. ' �.�_...,...
[ z 5 � departmennl Icam Maung 7l2 � � �- I ' � � j
€ " ' — __ �_'- _ - _ I __ '_ _.
!
_z� 7 ���a��c �ss�o�iria����gcomm�u�o�M���gx� ...._� .............. � _ ___ . ..'_.. _ ..I
__ _ � ..... _ �. I j
_..___. .__. �
� — — � ,
�
�
a , ;
° 2.7 Dnfi Communiry Necds Asenmenc ? � � j a
° i i i
� .._..���__..
_ � _
� i 1 I E � - j _
� 2 8 S �ing Commiaee Meeung JYL � � j— — �
. .,.W. __ _._. _ . -,- ..-.-..�.m.. ...,
.. ., r _ .._,_ '_ .
� 2 9 C Cou I Upd� #1 mm .._ i
-- -- - ' _-1 _ � � � � - � � _ _ _ ;
2 10 F I('o� .�NeeclsAss � ... _.. ._ �.
en� ( I
..�,..,w.. . ..».. .m..�..,. . . . ' . . -t
� .,._ ___.« . '�._ ..... __ . .. ... .
..«.. , ..,.�.. . . .. .... , ...... .. .�:. ,4,... . , . :A:,�,.
� 3 HQW DO WE GE1 TH£RE? F� �w �`"��`�� �a :� �
���a.3�a\��`��c� .� .,,., ���. `` ; �. a"e : �, � �;
;
� `
F, ....�.. _.:__ � : .,�.._� _- ,- _ ._..._
� .,
x� w �. � _, .
���,v � �. . �v. �:'; €
? 31 [ d�pu I lumnt ��gN; � ! ; I � � �
i
�. .._ ..._. .... ._ ..._.. ....__ . . �..._a .. _S._ '�._ _. _.. . . . A_ j..... .._l.__ .. "
� 3_ SCommun ry\s un ng W orklhop ,. .. .. , � ' .� ,
_ � �
+-- ' —� �- - ( _ _- - — � �_ ,
� 3 3 Rewmmendanon and Lnplcmenrwdon Sc gy D I p � � � �, _- ... -. _ . . ..W.. -_ ' ''_ ' _
_ _ __'""_'_'__.. rn� � . . ___ .....__. ..... ._._ __ .. _�..__.. I i �
3.4 CommuniryPnorirySurvcy � � I -' '�i � � LL 4�� �
� ......�_L.
i j
� _ . !._. ._ __ .___ ._.>....._ ._._.. .._ ._. ._ _ . i ... _ _ _ ._ __ _.. :
3 5 Decison M la g'I' Is j �
� ._ �
. . _� ._ ..... - � __-. _ _. �.. __ __. i ._. _ _ l
, �€ �6 I deparzmenral Twm M ng#4 � � } � �
�.__._ . _.,___' ' {' ___ .'.�_'-_ __.__ .. . -__ .._..._.. _...—`_ �. - ;
� _ —.._ e. _ -�— ..- .....__
�_.. _. �.._ ._.
= 3 7 Sreenng Cam�ruaee Mur ng#3 � I ; ��� '� � i i i � �
� i
g 3.8 Capiral Impcovement and Implcmennnon Plan � � �I � � � j � �
� '_ J- _ �__ � _ . � .. ....._ 7 �
i 3 9 J n�Parl.s C ion/Plan g Comm M cing#2 � � I i ��
� _. ._. __ .'_. ___ .__ __.._._.._._ __•.. ____�__ . . -_ __. . . _"'__._ ......_ ""_"_. I _ I ... ..__. _____. _ �.. _. ..."'____ ._ .... ....,
r 310 GryCounulUpdacek2 � �� ' r j
� . . . . , . ;__ . . .. ...
� �� ,�. C,. :� .L�,���.a„;a ' i� ��.:2 . . .=.� i. �i'�'Y� l:i. 1i v . a.:� p �
� ' `T SN Q � .: j °
r�
,u •.. �•�:�;' :S j
. . . . v.. .�. . ' �i . e . �8 �. . . ' . ..° Y1 :
.
. ':' :� `__ 7:�
.. � ��. �:. �.` �:fr� �: -.
, .� `�. . ..�.-, _ .' `x�-�f
n� 4.1 Draf�Conc<paal5�ce PU j �� ��� � _ _ '....._ ,.'.. ... .. _ __ _. ...
._ _._._....._._..._.' "_"__'_ , _.... '___. _. � F..._ �
S 4
'_.�__ - _.' *__ _ . . � ._. �_ . ..
' i
42 Communiry Meaings(2) . '
6_ _ � �_W— __— -... �- -.......... ..... f � I
e— _ — --
, a.s comP�ehe���e ria�roi��y a��� �
� ._ �._--- - - _ _
` 4 4 Ad n�scncrve Dnh Plan ' -� ' �'--- -- ' '
r
a � i � �
_ . ._. .r. _:.' � __. _ _ ._ ... 1 I � �
� 45 i depa ralTeamM«ungx5 � I � ` �� j
i
a_ ' �
� 4 6 S ing C Meecing#4 � �._- � I � ... _ ..� v 3
_ __ i !
� 4 7 Rrnscd Dnfr�Plan �-- _'' _._ ...__ .__ ._ _ _t . ..r �-.- ._ _ , ''__ - ' �
e i _7_ � i f ' �i .' €
- .-_.._... _ _. .'__ .- a' � _ ' ..._ '( "' i
4 8 SLI'A Checl.l D p FCo N ficanon&RCO Cerz�fca�wn � � I � { ;
� _ _. '_ _'_ i _ __ . _�__ � "'___j— '__ �. _ _ _ l _ __ _
a.� Io���ra��comm�ss�o�mia����gcomm�����Mre��ges i � � �� �
P` � � _ ..... }- __�..
� ... _ ___: _ ......_ _.. � �� -- -- " i
� 410 �CiryCoundlUpdace#3 � j �" f
_'._._.___ .___._ ! _'� i
€. . __...__ __ .__�__... .____� ._._ —s _._ _- ... _. _. `-
i _ _ _ �
� 411 IF �IPIa ... . ' . i k I � I� _. _ _ .. .. �E
_ _. +_ r
� ...___'._ _
� A t2 iPru�e�cGt O ea�dCoo�d��aoo„ -- — _._. � _ ..i.� ,- . _. ......
�_..�. ..«.. � , . „ . , ,.. �
�A1�.FJF1$�Si `. � __.
. .� .�,,:�� �
_. � � p� i� �,\....., �E..�
"� .� �," i
x � , ��,.
,.: • ... , �. ., �� 3 C„ i^. C'�� �' .��TC C . �
ti �
., ;zr. ::,. " �.
a:
�` �`�...� ...� -:
A Inmrpora FY dM eraronAra � ,^� w^m .
� ...M.���a�....�._._ ......__............... . ,.. ....,_. ...�.� ._ .__. ,
� � City of Renton—Long Range Parks,Recreation,Open Space and Natural Resources Plan
�
�� �
��il �
� sii - population: 67,485
� ` � � -�. %trips to work by bike: .34
�� � .. � ';: ; average annual bike collisions: 20
.A.�.;..,, ,:�
bicycle crash rate: .09
� � } �► ' population: 49,010
� � % trips to work by bike: .41 population: 120,600
,; ,::�,�,3��,i , average annual bike collisions: 16 %trips to work by bike: .6
i�����
� ",�-'� �, ���` bicycle crash rate: .07 average annual bike collisions: 32
� � bicycle crash rate: .04
`�. � -- . •
. � � _ ._.
* - population: 51,890
° � .�1;� . %trips to work by bike: 1.5 Population: 103,500
'�' ����s� {�3 �����`� average annual bike collisions: 21 0
-�>-- /o trips to work by bike: .57
� bicycle crash rate: .03 average annual bike collisions: 34
bicycle crash rate: .06
population: 86,230
%trips to work by bike: .33
average annual bike collisions: 14 Population: 88,580
bicycle crash rate: .05 %trips to work by bike: .13
average annual bike collisions: 12
bicycle crash rate: .1
population: 54,320
� % trips to work by bike: .5
average annual bike collisions: 7 Population: 112,380
bicycle crash rate: .03 %trips to work by bike: .03
average annual bike collisions: 32
bicycle crash rate: .75
population: 203,400
%trips to work by bike: .56
average annual bike collisions: 44
bicycle crash rate:,04
C�ClSC��C�e b
-- �
__ _ .
,�
.;K ry ; j � ��� .
1
�4� � p�1 '' .�
���FB� - �.•j 1 +1 4�
� � .qi� �
� ��, �� �•�—f �� � ` l�' �w n+�
� �
y -�,���]I
�'.l�y'..-. ,l�`,.. � � .'T�t..� .. � �.+.t
� ' _"�� ,,,}n`_
, __". ".., . .
�.r � . .. . . . . .... . ..
� � � _ `�
4�
�t�� -� -s.�
' '� " �� � � � The ten largest cities in the Puget Sound ���' � �� f',��., �
.� ,�� � ���,.� , �� � ���-�� .
��� , ¢ �,� region outside of Seattle were surveyed for ; • - , s � � ::
� � �������,,�:,:�s� .-- the Puget Sound Bicycle Scorecard.* The cities '' �
-�'�--� represented in this scorecard comprise nearly 1 million " '* � • "
. � `1��, people—over a quarter of the total population of the central '= *' - '•• " '`
�"�� `�; `��., _ Puget Sound region. Based on Census data, the average • " � - • ' " `
r, ,
� ".\ . . "3t� . .
:•. �-� �" ` ���
�,,, ;:;r �.✓ '' percentage of work trips taken by bicycle within the ten cities is .5 ' ' °' •
�
'� � ��� —with the highest percentage in Redmond at 1.5. .
� ��Tkcw,�.# ..�.- - - -. e.,�i�' .
l
This report is intended for the general public, local bicycle advocates, W • ' . • �_ `•r�
city planners and policy makers. It provides baseline information regarding '�• • - • -
the progress and status of city-wide policies, plans and data collection � • � - • � w
efForts related to bicycling. The importance of the types of policies and plans -i`
reflected in this survey cannot be overstated; the top bicycling cities around
the world -- notably Copenhagen, Amsterdam, and Portland -- experienced ' ' ,
tremendous growth by establishing aggressive plans and policies that recognize ``' ' ' ` " " '
bicycling as a priority. ` " � - � ' ,
"- . � . II �
To compile the information presented in this scorecard, Cascade Bicycle Club �
designed and distributed a survey to the appropriate city department in each ° " I'I �` `
of the ten cities. The survey questions were designed to gain insight into the "'' " � � ' ` °
� distinct plans, policies and overall level of support for bicycling within each "'' �' '"' '""� ` '�`"'� '�'` `
municipality. While the survey questions were general, the responses indicate
areas in which cities are excelling in their level of support for bicycling as well as opportunities for improvement.
As Cascade seeks to bolster support for bicycling throughout the central Puget Sound region,this report
provides valuabie information and data that will help to monitor the progress of bicycle-supportive
plans and policy development in the ten partner cities. It will also help inform and prioritize our
advocacy efforts as an organization. We plan to update this report every two years.
We want to thank all the cities for participating in this effort. We look forward to
continuing our bicycle advocacy work with each jurisdiction.
�bic�%�b
C�0
�----
'`.y „y' '_. .>.. . .kt. .... , �,; '+., ' y �
x 's
�,. � � r� '�{t,
w ,
a �
�
....n+� ` � � � � � � � �� _ . .'. ��� t a ~�'Fr S�',.�. j..
a
, . � �I � 'f � «� r:
. , a_. . , ,�.. .
�� .�� , .- ' �
,
� �
._ � r
>.', * a �t �
. . . .. . � 31"��, � ,i �f A+a�,.
{, . �f" ' �'� ����4„ ��
Developing and adopting a com rehensive nonmotorized to implementing ,�� - • � � � >� '«
p � nonmotorized lans �;.� , � �
plan is essential for improving and expanding a citys bicycle p
infrastructure and ultimately encouraging more people to bicycle. and projects and '�� F,���� .
It is difficult to receive funding for bicycle projects if they are abiding policies such ` � •':'�>
not identified and prioritized in a city plan. There are specific as Complete Streets. ; , .��w��
Cities will often �' � '--`" 5 `��
elements within nonmotorized transportation plans that will help �� �, ` ��
� su ort im lementation and fundin of the lan, such as a ro ect establish an advisory �-�`',��.,� ��_,v-.. �:,x.x
Pp P 9 P P J � � x�,��w.�.- ,..: � �
implementation timeline, a prioritized project list and identified committee to oversee �� �-�""
� z,� ' ,,a, _.;;,..`
funding sources. in this category, cities were asked questions t he deve lopment ,, _
pertaining to elements of their nonmotorized plan. of a nonmotorized �` { ,fi
plan; however, these y�`""�� �
committees can serve
Policies provide the framework to support decision making and an important role throughout the implementation of the plan as well.
funding of projects and plans within a city. There are many policies In this category, cities were asked about the presence of a bicycle
that can be adopted or amended to support investments in bicycling. advisory committee, dedicated bicycle staff and a local advisory
For instance, the City of Portland, Oregon, recently adopted a policy group.
to "create conditions to make bicycling more attractive than driving
for trips of three miles or less." Ideally, these policies will be further
regulated through legislation, such as an adopted "Complete As bicycling and walking become more established modes of
Streets" ordinance. In this category, cities were asked questions transportation and recreation, a major challenge undermining the
� regarding Complete Streets policies and bicycle parking ordinances, level of.support and recognition of these modes is the lack of data on
both of which support the inclusion of bicycle facilities in various city usage and demand. Without quantitative data about bicycling and
planning and design efforts. If cities indicated having a Complete walking, it remains difficult to illustrate the benefits of nonmotorized
Streets policy of some type, they were asked how it was adopted. investments, and thus challenging to integrate bicycle and pedestrian
While Complete Streets resolutions are a step in the right direction, travel into mainstream planning and transportation modeling. In this
they are not enforceable like ordinances. category, cities were asked about their bicycle data collection and
analysis efforts, specifically pertaining to usage and safety.
Having an organized bicycle advisory committee, dedicated
bicycle staff, and a local bicycle advocacy group (in addition to
Cascade Bicycle Club) is essential to holding the city accountable I
�b c � b
�---
'.'.�� �� ;�.ro: ,j .a.,it .'.., . . ..,.:.. . . . ..: ... ..�.. -....'...... .., ,. ... . ....: .:�,. . . .. .:....... . . . ._..
If � ..�.- �. I q.._ .. ... ....... ...... .. . . ... . . .... _ .. . ...... .. . . .. . . . ., .... . .. ..�.. , ;.,. ...
P�
�. � O � ��
. o �:A . �J�� ���JJ ���,�'� O��P� �� ��P� 0��� ���� o���,� �o�P
: PJ �� �J �� �� �\� �� �� �� �P
�
�, Nonmotorized plan -..�. _.. _ � — ._. _ ,.- � _,, i —.. . -- -
_
: C��C`� C���� Q3�� C�'� �� O�'O , C��'C� (��'`O ��0 � �'��?
� I
,
Stand-alone
plan �'� �,'� `��. ,_..� �'� �'� �„�,- �''� �'�,,�..�� Q�'�
� �:= i
a� i
Year adopted/ !
updated �
20C9 2rU�' i�C� 4t�;�� �''�):� 2G�v9 2�;:.s 2�t?9 2005 20����
Next plan update , �1, .11 v �� , ��
2011 201�+ ir� process 2„ � � 2�. ?_01�l 20"�;-"s 1 as needed in proc�:.,s �s ner-_sc#cci
Miles of proposed
bicycle routes 3��. �3C�� 52 routes JL `M�°° .S�i �G 96.5 5� 1o�s
• Prioritized project _ _ _ Y _ , I _�
��St �2� � o a��� �{o c �� o�b �o �� o��o
�¢.
. �
i
�
�
Implementation
timeline ��� l� _., ., , �a ,�~�
Q�� �` Q���� Q°�� I '�* V°�
Dedicated funding (�l� ���� �� ��� � ���; (�%(� ��'� Q�,%(� � �`s� ��
� • - s r •.r s^ r
b" e c/ub "'�'�
/�is��� � tc r • � -s � . ♦- • �• s • �� ; . ��� �'i��° _
�'� �,. �s�"Y
�----- :w��- � s • r r r
.
.- �
. � ..: . �� _..,.,... �, . �
... , .. .. . �....».,u...�.... .._...... -...�.�:....�......,�..-,...
. .._....... . .. . e.�u.,....,�»........«..0.................,:::�.a..............,«:..:...........w.:�:. .._...��:���:...__,.,� ,wu........,.. a.�w �.,'�7,.�t""".......a�"'ww ,_.. .. . .
� .. . _. _ _ . _ _ _
_....
` � ,:
� P�
J� � � � � \�F.
�� J � p- � �� � �, P
# _ . A '� J�J ����, ���� O�Q- �,� ��,P Q� �,�0 0��. Gp�1`
P 0 � ��' ��C' �F-�� Q-�' ��i' �� .�P
� .<: , - - - - -
Complete Streets " �� � � ' -''
� �r�� O�'C� ��M �:��. C��C� C7a'� � C�'O ':;� G`C�
:� �
;
i
�
_ Type of i
---- Complete Streets , (
— � _ _ �'.a. ,.2,::.3r. — — � �, �zc���,., . .s_�T.' _.C? _>i�i.-��:F', — ,�: �Oi�IiiC�^
� � Bicycle parking „ - - - ,�
ordinance � �`s,; ��` '`'� "`_,�� �f� ��� �� ��„z '��,
,� ��'k ��` � �.�w,� �..�-
I
� � _, _
. . �
Bike coordinator r �� Q�� �°�� :�A". ,.� �'� �'� �`� �� �'�
,.. ��.� `� �
I
� Advisory group `� � ( �
G��`O �,�,� Q..'� � ;t�� C�"� U���'C� Q�'�O �'�� i ;�:
� `��
� � � � ..,
Local bicycle �
advocacy group** , ,';,� �� J� , �'`,;- � `� .: � ...�' ���
i ��#� �..� �� ��� � �:�: ,
Bicycle counts �� ��o �.� �4� �f� �� I ��� �f� °���
�� C�'�
Bicycle (
..• �.._ collision data '---' -__�- -_� - -, -.��. I -. _ - � _. -_,;, i _ .
�=fo ���c� aRF� o�� c�'� o=� i ec�� c�f� c��o � c o
bG'Cl+�e b .- ,s- : . - /;�� �;��
� �,i"v/ � � . .. . . q,�.x v� . ''
.R,✓�. ��. .
, -�"
-�, .,.. ... :�: . :� . .. ,
. .. ..:.' ; .: � .. ;�
..:. ..... . . . � .:.-�+ : .��.� .0 a w
k
� . °�,. �' �" � � �
.. ,.. �
The Puget Sound A few good examples:
Bicycle Scorecard Complete Streets Ordinance: Kirkland
� provides a s�apshot of excerpt: "Bicycle and pedestrian ways shall be
� � c�b
� � � c� �, the ten largest cities accommodated in the planning, development and construction
� � � � � in the central Puget of transportation facilities, including the incorporation of such ways
� � �' � � � � Sound re ion (minus into transportation plans and programs."
c�s � d� � d� c� � c� g.
� d� c� c-3� � c�b c� c�b � Seattle) and their Stand-alone Plan: Tacoma Mobility Plan
� �' � � �' � � �`' � bicycle policies, plans The City of Tacoma developed a Strategic Mobility Master Plan with the
c� e�b e�b d� c� c�b � c�b d�v
�g �, � d� � �, �, �, �, � and other important goal of developing a comprehensive network of bikeways and pedestrian
c�b � c=cb �' c�b c� d� c�b c�b c� city-wide provisions. walkways citywide to enhance the comfort and safety of all users, improve
�`��pCa�a�pt`a�¢Cti.�C�J��2���`�F�¢\\�J`?�PJ,pJ�C ,�e°`�`a\y�a,ro`e�S� Based on the survey access to transit and to increase the non-motorized mode split within the city.
4 ��a 5 responses reflected Bicycie Parking Ordinance: Renton
in this Scorecard, it's excerpt: Bicycle parking shall be provided for all residential
clear that all surveyed cities have nonmotorized transportation plans. developments that exceed five (5) residential units and/or all non-
However, because most cities are required under the Washington State residential developments that exceed four thousand (4,000) gross
Growth Management Act to include a bicycle and pedestrian component square feet in size. One-half(0.5) bicycle parking space per
in their comprehensive plan, this Scorecard also recognizes those cities one dwelling unit. The number of bicycle parking spaces
that have taken nonmotorized planning to the next level by developing shall be ten percent(10%) of the number of
a stand-alone nonmotorized transportation plan. We were impressed required off-street parking spaces.
by the results -- more than half of the cities have developed, or are ,
� developing, a plan devoted specifically to bicycling.
With regard to Complete Streets policies, half of the surveyed cities
have an adopted ordinance or resolution relating to Complete Streets, Overall, we were impressed with the number of cities that have these
and two other cities are working on adopting an ordinance. The survey
types of provisions in place, and we look forward to working with each
responses also provided insight into specific elements of each city's city to develop, improve and implement relevant plans and policies.
nonmotorized plan, such as the presence of a project implementation Above, we've highlighted a few good examples of the types of plans
timeline, a prioritized project list, and dedicated funding sources -- key and policies that were referred to in this Scorecard. We hope this
ingredients to support strategic and efficient implementation of the plan. provides useful guidance for cities seeking to improve in some of these
While some of the cities have these components in place, others do not. areas. We encourage the public to use this document to advocate for
Cascade Bicycle Club will continue to work with cities to e�sure these the types of policies, plans and programs that will allow bicycling to
elements are included when the plans are updated. become a viable and attractive mode of transportation and recreation in
every city.
�bic�c%�b
CC10
�----
• •
� • • � � � � � � � � .
� • • •
Hello Terry,
Announcing our Mid Year Conference & Trade Show Keynote:
Martha Bryan is a management consultant, author, speaker,
� and seminar leader who speaks nationally and internationally
;regarding the development of human potential and personal
'excellence.
With an education background in teaching, she has taught at
both high school and college levels and has held positions in
both government and private industry.
Fascinated by what makes some individuals strive to be the very best, Martha
has devoted her life to studying peak performers. She is a highly effective
organization consultant and dynamic public speaker who is recognized for her
informative, down-to-earth, and entertaining keynote presentations and
workshops. You will enjoy spending time with her! More
2010 Mid Year Conference &Trade Show
"From the Ground Up"
Friday November 19, 2010
Washington State Convention £r Trade Center
$99 members/$149 non-member
Twice a year we get together in a big way! The Mid Year
provides essential training and resources that help our
members build strong networks, adapt, grow and thrive in
;;�-,-�= our new economy.
` ; -
�m` "
• Early bird reQistration: $99 rate for member
delegates registered by Friday October 15th.
• Mid Year Schedule - View our tracks...custom
designed for park facitity and maintenance, board and
commission members and recreation services.
Visit our Mid Year web site for the most up to date information, schedules,
exhibitors and more... Look for the comptete educational program to be
announced early September.
�� Nort�west pl&���d
Eqvipment, jnc.
Message sent to:
• WRPA membership
About Washington Recreation £t Park Association: WRPA is a not-
for-profit. 50Y (c)(3) organization. Our mission is to
provide resources for fhe public and our members
who create community through people, parks, and
programs.
Washington Recreation ft Park Association
Brit Kramer, CPRP, CAE
britkC�wrpatodav.or�
Executive Director
Forward email
�SafeUnsubscri6e� Email Marketing by
This email was sent to thigashiyama@rentonwa.gov by �
britk anwrpatodav.orq. "�"�
U�date Profile/Email Address � Instant removal with �t�' �
SafeUnsubscribeT"' � Privacy Policv. T R Y I T F R E E
Washington Recreation &Park Association � 4405 7th Ave SE, Suite 202 � Lacey � WA �
98503
I
• �
THE CEDAR RIVER SALMON JOURNEY
Pvget Sound�
s�ar�s�ere
BOTHELL �'
Volunteers Good with people, Interested �� �RentonLibrary
i n fish? �Cedar River Park
need ed Sign up to be a volunteer naturalist on SEATTLE ftEDA10N� �RiverviewPark
the Cedar River this fall! Volunteer �Cavanaugh Pond
f or the naturatists will receive training from
�Landsburg Park
watershed and fish experts before SEAT BELLEVUE
spending three weekend days making
C e da r riverside presentations to the pubtic
about the Cedar River and its salmon SNOQUALMIE
Ri ver run. SEATTLE NEWCASTLE �SSAQ AH
� RENTON
Training 'EN Ceda� 6
S a l m o n e��O�-Ma 9<
Training is scheduled for three pPd °
weekday evenings (September 16, 23, � P�
Journ ey 30) and two Saturdays (September 25 �u^
and October 9j. Trainin�sessions witl MAPLE
VALLEY
prepare volunteer naturalists to talk Kent-KangleyRd
about the human and natural history
of the Cedar River, including: salmon FE�A�AL AUBUAN BLACK
� and their life-cycle and habitat needs, °'"""°"°
Cedar River wildlife, human impacts
on satmon, and what we can do to protect salmon. Most of the trainings will be held
in the Renton area, with one training at the Seattle Aquarium.
On Dut Da s
Y
Y
Once trained, volunteers commit to work in teams at one of the five sites along the
Cedar River: Renton Library, Cedar River Park, Riverview Park, Cavanaugh Pond
�r�':��:, and Landsburg Park. Each team will work three of the six event days: October
,,�.�. �::..,p
�`�°��"`��"�� 16, 17, 23, 24, 30, 31.
��..�;;
+�:.f
Interested?
Interested volunteers will be sent an application to complete and return.
Appticants will be notified in,early September.
Call Charlotte Spang at 206-245-0143 or email her
at charlotteC�cedarriver.org. Please indude your
contact information and any questions. Visit us on:
..,�� ,
www.cedarriver.org � '� '�"
� �`�`� ��
This program would not be possibte without the help of our sponsors
�',��r� Seattle
��� '�. . ��� �Public `
;..�..
Frien S of the SEATTLE AQUARIUM Utilities
Cedar River � �W���w�> �Y
o Uti �
Watershed '�''` tt'� ` �
� �1"\" � � i ♦
US Amfy Corps King Conservation Dlstrlct '*M,, � � T�Z
ot Englneers MISH� N
�
o � }�
0
r�u _._
� Ci`) of,- ,,�
eer 1 ��
� � � �`►" ,.'" G,. .i r,.
lun � � --, :. .
Yo � � �
� �� � � � � ���=
.��
y
. . . , �r�A�r� �� . .
' � � .::�r " " �'� ��".t�Y'��"r"�u..4�
4� �
F'
� •
. . �
� , , . . . ��� . . , .. . . .
, -;�3 �
� i , , ' " , ' �sa�;°z�"���J�,���k d����
,� e� i �u��}',+4,�,
g �
� .�,.F,w�'..�"rx� s�,.a`� yj�fJ�t YI
, e�r�,'."�'#�e^. ��
.rt,.,� .i,
„�+'�:?j���,d���� ii�,�i�,;V!��p�pi
fi
a i� �I
� �
i20i � d. •
)
�
. 1
��
Get ready and roll up your sleeves, enjoy the changing autumn
leaves, and help with park beautification! We'll provide you with tools,
water, and a small snack to keep you energized.
All volunteers must sign-in and participate in a safety orientation.
Minors must have parental consent forms (available online).
Call 425-430-6600 to register your group, yourself, or family
or for more information!