HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 04/21/2008 AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
• REGULAR MEETING
April 21, 2008
Monday, 7 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PROCLAMATIONS:
a. Arbor Day/Earth Day - April 26, 2008
b. National Volunteer Week- April 27 to May 3, 2008
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Text amendments for Monopole I in residential zones and housekeeping amendments to wireless
regulations in all zones
b. Pre-annexation development agreement with Cedar River Lightfoot, Inc. regarding a six-acre
parcel located within the New Life - Aqua Barn Annexation area
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the
Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record,
SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
II7. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 4/14/2008. Council concur.
b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 4/15/2008 for CAG-08-038, City Center Parking Garage Police
Substation; five bids; engineer's estimate $150,000; and submits staff recommendation to award
the contract to low bidder, M.J. Ness Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of$219,680.70.
Council concur.
c. City Clerk reports bid opening on 4/16/2008 for CAG-08-037, Police Locker Rooms; five bids;
engineer's estimate $450,000; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to low
bidder, H.S. Builders, Inc., in the amount of$245,895.20. Council concur.
d. City Clerk reports bid opening on 4/15/2008 for CAG-08-033, Ripley Lane N. Storm System
Improvement; seven bids; engineer's estimate $1,565,069; and submits staff recommendation to
award the contract to the low responsive bidder, Rodarte Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$1,475,874. Council concur.
e. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval to amend the 2008 Budget
in the total amount of$486,000 to carry forward funds from 2007 for information technology
projects that were not completed in 2007. Refer to Finance Committee.
f. Police Department recommends approval of the starting compensation for four specific Lateral
Police Officers at Step D of the salary range. Council concur.
g. Transportation Systems Division requests approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to CAG-
07-033, agreement with MacLeod Reckord for a trails and bikeways study and map, in the
• amount of$16,719.30 for additional work and a term extension to 12/31/2008. Council concur.
h. Utility Systems Division recommends approval to adjust current utility discount rates for low-
income senior/disabled residents. Council concur. (See 9. for ordinance.)
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
• the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: Ed Prince Appointment to Planning Commission; 2008
Neighborhood Grants (1st Round)
b. Planning & Development Committee: Release of Restrictive Covenants Placed by King County
for 6,000 Square Foot Lots; City Code Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket
c. Public Safety Committee: International Fire Code Adoption; Valley Communications Interlocal
Agreement Amendment
d. Utilities Committee: Contract with HDR Engineering for Automatic Meter Reading System
Evaluation
9. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Ordinance for first reading:
Adjusting utility discount rates for low-income senior/disabled residents (see 7.h.)
Ordinances for second and final reading:
a. Vacation of portion of alley south of S. Tobin St. (1st reading 4/14/2008)
b. 2008 Budget amendment re: Logan Ave. N. Bicycle Lane (1st reading 4/14/2008)
10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
11. AUDIENCE COMMENT
12. ADJOURNMENT
•
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Council Conference Room
6 p.m.
Emerging Issues in Fire and Emergency Services;
Sound Shake Report
IlkHearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES.&THURS.AT 11 AM&9 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9 AM&7 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1 PM&9 PM
i w
•
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
April 21, 2008 Council Chambers
Monday, 7 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Denis Law called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and
led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF MARCIE PALMER, Council President; DON PERSSON; KING PARKER;
COUNCILMEMBERS TERRI BRIERE; RICH ZWICKER; GREG TAYLOR; RANDY CORMAN.
CITY STAFF IN DENIS LAW, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer;
ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk;
GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Public Works Administrator; TERRY
HIGASHIYAMA, Community Services Administrator; TERRY FLATLEY,
Parks Maintenance Manager/City Forester; ALEX PIETSCH, Community and
Economic Development Administrator; REBECCA LIND, Planning Manager;
PREETI SHRIDHAR, Communications Director; MARTY WINE,Assistant
CAO;DEPUTY CHIEF CHUCK DUFFY, Fire Department; CHIEF KEVIN
MILOSEVICH, Police Department.
PROCLAMATIONS A proclamation by Mayor Law was read declaring 4/26/2008 to be "Arbor
Arbor Day/Earth Day- Day/Earth Day" in the City of Renton and encouraging all citizens to join in this
4/26/2008 special observance and to endeavor to think and act ecologically, economically,
and ethically to create a sustainable future. MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
PROCLAMATION. CARRIED.
Accepting the proclamation with appreciation,Parks Maintenance
Manager/City Forester Flatley encouraged everyone to celebrate Arbor Day and
Earth Day by helping to plant vegetation at Heritage Park on April 26.
National Volunteer Week - A proclamation by Mayor Law was read declaring April 27 to May 3,2008,to
April 27 to May 3, 2008 be "National Volunteer Week" in the City of Renton and encouraging all
members of the community to express appreciation to volunteers across the City
for their commitment to service and to promote the spirit of volunteerism in
families and neighborhoods. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED.
Community Services Administrator Higashiyama accepted the proclamation and
acknowledged the approximately 3,500 volunteers who donated over 57,000
hours to the City in 2007.
PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Planning: Development accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Law opened the public hearing to
Regulations (Title IV) Docket consider City Code Title IV (Development Regulations) Docket Item 08-01:
Review text amendments for Monopole I in residential zones and housekeeping
amendments to wireless regulations in all zones.
Planning Manager Lind noted that the amendments are needed due to changes
in industry standards,which include the public demand for greater wireless
coverage and the need for more poles and smaller land areas. She defined a
Monopole I as "A wireless communication support structure which consists of a
freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet in height, erected to support
wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances."
April 21, 2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 125
Ms. Lind explained that the proposal allows Monopole I structures on
residentially zoned sites of one-half acre with an administrative conditional use
permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from adjacent residentially zoned
properties, and with a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit when setbacks
are less than 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties. Finally, the
structure locations will be restricted within the public right-of-way to designated
arterial roads.
Pointing out that the proposed housekeeping amendments do not change the
regulatory content of City Code,Ms. Lind stated that the amendments are
needed to increase consistency and accuracy by clarifying language, adding
cross-referencing, and changing the names of reviewing staff to the more
generalized "Reviewing Official." In conclusion, she indicated that the next
step is for the Planning and Development Committee to present its report on the
matter to the full Council.
Public comment was invited.
Michael Cady(Sammamish), representing T-Mobile USA, Inc., expressed
support for the amendment allowing Monopole I structures on half-acre lots in
residential zones. However, he noted that the amendment does not address the
need for additional height. Additionally,Mr. Cady voiced opposition to the
amendment that allows the structures only on designated arterial roads,pointing
out the lack of right-of-way space available to place necessary equipment. He
recommended that the City allow additional height if a structure is located on a
half-acre parcel and allow equipment on residential properties subject to review
by the Hearing Examiner.
MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL ALLOW
THE SPEAKER TWO MORE MINUTES. CARRIED.
Mr. Cady submitted a letter outlining his comments. In response to Council
inquiries,Mr. Cady detailed the size of space needed to contain the equipment
in cabinets, shelters, and underground vaults. He indicated that once installed,
the equipment may need maintenance once a month. Additionally,Mr. Cady
noted that the equipment needs to be placed within 50 to 100 feet of the
monopole,preferably within ten feet, and he affirmed that increasing the height
of the monopole increases the coverage area.
Michael Ekness (Renton)voiced his support for the amendments, especially the
100-foot setbacks and allowing the monopoles only in arterial rights-of-way.
He noted that the poles are very obtrusive in neighborhoods.
Responding to Councilmember Corman's inquiry, Ms. Lind explained that City
Code distinguishes between different monopole heights, for example,the
Monopole II is greater than 60 feet and has its own set of standards. Mr.
Corman questioned whether a different set of standards is needed in the future
for monopoles that are 30 or 40 feet in height.
Chuck Gitchel (Renton) agreed with the amendment regarding the 100 foot
setbacks on one-half acre lots; however, he expressed concern regarding the
lack of setbacks for rights-of-way. Mr. Gitchel pointed out that these structures
lower property values.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY PARKER,
SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
April 21, 2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 126
Annexation: New Life - Aqua This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Barn, Development Agreement accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Law opened the public hearing to
with Cedar River Lightfoot consider a pre-annexation development agreement with Cedar River Lightfoot,
Inc. and Lennon Investments, Inc. regarding a six-acre parcel located within the
proposed New Life-Aqua Barn Annexation area that abuts the south side of
Renton-Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169).
Planning Manager Lind reported that the during the 2007 Comprehensive Plan
amendment review cycle, R-14 zoning was approved for the parcel, subject to
an agreement restricting development to no more than 45 units. Explaining that
King County has already reviewed the site as Phase 2 of the Molasses Creek
condominium development project, she pointed out that the project is not yet
vested and that shared utility improvements exist with Phase 1 of the
development.
Ms. Lind stated that the development agreement is needed to prevent a
maximum density of approximately 86 units if the project were to be re-
designed. She relayed the staff recommendation to approve the development
agreement,which restricts the total number of units to 45 and establishes R-14
zoning.
Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER,
SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL
AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT WITH CEDAR RIVER LIGHTFOOT, INC. AND LENNON
INVESTMENTS, INC. CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs
adopted as part of its business plan for 2008 and beyond. Items noted included:
* Oakesdale Ave. SW will be closed under I-405 April 22 through April 24,
from approximately 8 p.m. to 5 a.m.,to allow the contractor to hang three
large girders for the new I-405 southbound bridge over Oakesdale Ave. SW.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Paul Witt(Renton) stated that a large event was held at the Sikh Temple located
Citizen Comment: Witt- Sikh on Talbot Rd. S. on April 19, and as a result, many vehicles were parked
Temple Event, Parking illegally along S. 53rd Pl. blocking the street, mailboxes and fire hydrants. Mr.
Violations Witt expressed concern regarding the blocked access for emergency vehicles
and the lack of consequences for law violators. Pointing out that multiple calls
were made to 911,he voiced concern regarding the lack of response. Mr. Witt
requested that the City take steps to ensure that the neighborhood is kept safe,
and to work with the temple so that events are successful, safe, and legal.
Mayor Law stated that the Transportation and Police departments did work with
the temple on the event and the City will review what took place.
Citizen Comment: Troxel - Jon Troxel (Friday Harbor) stated that he is the owner of an 11-unit apartment
Joe's Bar and Grill building located next to Joe's Bar and Grill (2621 NE Sunset Blvd.), and
Disturbances (NE Sunset Blvd) expressed concern regarding the noise that emanates from the bar and disrupts
his tenants who have a right to a peaceful home. Pointing out that
approximately thirty 911 calls have been made since the first of the year,Mr.
Troxel urged the City to find a solution to this ongoing problem.
April 21,2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 127
Mayor Law assured that the Police Department is sensitive to this, and he said
the Police Chief will send the bar ownership a letter and use various tactics to
address the matter.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 4/14/2008. Council concur.
4/14/2008
CAG: 08-038, City Center City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/15/2008 for CAG-08-038, City Center
Parking Garage Police Parking Garage Police Substation; five bids; engineer's estimate $150,000; and
Substation, MJ Ness submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder,M.J.Ness
Construction Co Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of$219,680.70. Council concur.
CAG: 08-037, Police Locker City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/16/2008 for CAG-08-037,Police Locker
Rooms, HS Builders Rooms; five bids; engineer's estimate $450,000; and submitted staff
recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, H.S. Builders, Inc., in the
amount of$245,895.20. Council concur.
CAG: 08-033, Ripley Lane N City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/15/2008 for CAG-08-033, Ripley Lane N.
Storm System Improvement, Storm System Improvement; seven bids; engineer's estimate $1,565,069; and
Rodarte Construction submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low responsive
bidder, Rodarte Construction, Inc., in the amount of$1,475,874. Council
concur.
Budget: 2008 Amendment, Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval to amend
Information Technology the 2008 Budget in the total amount of$486,000 to carry forward funds from
Projects 2007 for information technology projects that were not completed in 2007.
Refer to Finance Committee.
Police: Lateral Police Officers Police Department recommended approval of the starting compensation for four
Hire at Step D specific Lateral Police Officers at Step D of the salary range. Council concur.
CAG: 07-033,Trails and Transportation Systems Division requested approval of Supplemental
Bikeways Study and Map, Agreement No. 2 to CAG-07-033, agreement with MacLeod Reckord for a trails
MacLeod Reckord and bikeways study and map, in the amount of$16,719.30 for additional work
and a term extension to 12/31/2008. Council concur.
Utility: Low-Income Senior& Utility Systems Division recommended approval to adjust current utility
Disabled Utility Rates discount rates for low-income senior/disabled residents. Council concur. (See
page 130 for ordinance.)
MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Parker presented a report
Planning& Development regarding the release of restrictive covenants for 6,000 square foot lots. The
Committee Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve
Development Services: the release of the restrictive covenants placed by King County on older plats
Release of Restrictive restricting lot size and width to standards different than current City zoning
Covenants Placed by King standards for the property.
County re Lot Size and Width The Committee found that the requirements for approving a release of these
restrictions are met. The change in Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning
of the properties constitutes a change in circumstance. The restrictions are now
undesirable as they prevent properties from being developed to the standards
anticipated under approved existing zoning and development standards. The
application of these outdated restrictions is also found to be duly burdensome to
April 21, 2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 128
the property owners as they are thereby prevented from exercising the same
property rights as owners of similarly zoned properties.
The Committee further recommended that Council direct staff to ignore these
outdated restrictions. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY ZWICKER,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Planning: Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Parker presented a report
Regulations (Title IV) Docket regarding the City Code Title IV (Development Regulations) docket. The
Review Committee recommended concurrence in the Planning Commission
recommendation to approve Docket Item 06-28,Assisted Living, as follows:
• Create a new definition for assisted living to replace retirement residence.
• Revise the definition for convalescent centers to clarify that a skilled
nursing staff administers convalescent care.
• Apply density standards to assisted living facilities,but allow them to
develop at a ratio of 1.5 units per the base density of the zone.
• Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone.
• Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of
18 total residential units per acre.
• Include assisted living in the parking standards table and require one
parking space per residential unit of assisted living,plus dedicated parking
spaces for facility fleet vehicles.
The Committee further recommended concurrence in the Planning Commission
recommendation to approve Docket Item 07-01, Height Requirement for
Utilities in Residential Zones, as follows:
• The proposed height for above ground and elevated water reservoirs and
public utility of: 1) 175 feet for an above-ground standpipe water reservoir,
an elevated water tank, and a water treatment facility to the highest point of
the water storage reservoir; and 2) 50 feet maximum height for water
facilities such as water treatment facilities and pump stations.
• Allow additional setbacks for water treatment facilities and pump stations
through the administrative site plan review process.
• Allow modification to lot coverage through the administrative site plan
review process.
• Require graphic treatment of new water tanks to be reviewed by the
Municipal Arts Commission.
MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Briere presented a report recommending
Committee concurrence in Mayor Law's appointment of Ed Prince to the Planning
Appointment: Planning Commission for an unexpired term expiring 6/30/2010.*
Commission Councilmember Briere introduced Mr. Prince,who was present in the audience,
and noted that he is the first resident of the Benson Hill Communities area to
join the commission.
*MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
EDNSP: 2008 Neighborhood Community Services Committee Chair Briere presented a report regarding the
Program Grants 2008 neighborhood grant projects (first round). The Committee recommended
concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the following grant awards:
April 21,2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 129
1. Downtown Committee/South Renton Neighborhood Association- Includes
a spring clean up and planting assorted plants in containers in the downtown
($2,371).
2. LaCrosse Homeowners Association-Placing two entrance signs at the
north and south entrances into the neighborhood ($454).
3. Liberty Ridge Homeowners Association - Creating a small playground and
installing a bench, swings, and a play structure with appropriate landscaping
($23,517).
4. Maureen Highlands Homeowners Association - Landscaping around a
neighborhood retention pond and adding benches, doggie stations, trash
cans, and newsletter holders ($7,860).
5. May Creek Homeowners Association - Replacing an existing fence, which
was part of the original development in 1989 ($2,871).
6. Parkside Court Homeowners Association- Cleaning up and landscaping
around the neighborhood retention pond($3,039).
7. Renton Hill Neighborhood Association-Placing two neighborhood
entrance signs at points of entry on Renton Ave. S. and I-405 and Cedar
Ave. S. and I-405 ($8,210).
8. Rolling Hills Homeowners Association- Installing an improved fence
barrier to comply with Washington State Department of Health mandate
($6,087).
9. The Vineyards Homeowners Association- Sandblasting an entrance rock
sign($4,224).
10. Tiffany Park Neighborhood Association- Continuing development of a
neighborhood park, Ginger Creek Urban Park, located on Seattle Public
Utilities-owned right-of-way in Renton ($1,189).
11. Victoria Park Homeowners Association - Installing an entrance sign, with
lighting, at the south entrance into the neighborhood ($2,782).
12. Windwood Homeowners Association - Landscaping improvements at the
front entrance and lights installation around the entrance sign ($1,100).
13. Windwood Homeowners Association - Placing signs within the
neighborhood to identify areas where children play and signs to encourage
residents to clean up after their pets ($1,152).
The Committee further recommended approval of funding for the following
administrative newsletter applications:
1. Aster Park Homeowners Association- Annual costs for newsletter printed
quarterly and distributed door-to-door($36).
2. Earlington Neighborhood Association-Annual costs for a newsletter
printed quarterly and distributed door-to-door and by United States Postal
Service(USPS); $440.
3. Heritage Garden Estates Homeowners Association-Annual costs for a
newsletter printed and distributed by USPS six times a year($50).
4. Liberty Ridge Homeowners Association-Annual costs for a newsletter
printed quarterly and distributed by USPS ($572).
5. Maureen Highlands Homeowners Association- Annual costs for a
newsletter printed and distributed door-to-door twice a year($125).
6. North Renton Neighborhood Association -Annual costs for a newsletter
printed quarterly and distributed door-to-door ($915).
7. Renton Hill Neighborhood Association - Annual costs for a newsletter
printed and distributed door-to-door twice a year($433).
8. Rolling Hills Homeowners Association -Annual costs for a newsletter
printed and distributed door-to-door and by USPS ($330).
April 21,2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 130
9. Summit Park Homeowners Association- Annual costs for a newsletter
printed and distributed door-to-door twice a year($48).
10. Victoria Park Homeowners Association-Annual costs for a newsletter
printed and distributed by USPS ($248).
The first round of applications totals $68,053, leaving a balance of$8,947. A
second round will follow,with a deadline for applications of 10/10/2008.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Zwicker presented a report recommending
Utility: Automatic Meter concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the engineering consultant
Reading System Evaluation, agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement with
HDR Engineering HDR Engineering, Inc. in the amount of$80,928 for professional services to
support the City's acquisition, development, and implementation of an
automatic meter reading system. MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY
TAYLOR, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Public Safety Committee Public Safety Committee Chair Taylor presented a report regarding Fire
Fire: Emergency Response Department response times. The Committee was briefed on this issue in 2007
Times for Medical Aid and recommended no changes to the current policy at this time. MOVED BY
TAYLOR, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
CAG: 00-049, Valley Public Safety Committee Chair Taylor presented a report recommending
Communications Center concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize Mayor Denis Law to
Interlocal Agreement ratify the first amendment to the Valley Communications Center governing
interlocal agreement. MOVED BY TAYLOR, SECONDED BY PERSSON,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services: Sister Councilmember Corman recapped his recent trip to Renton's Sister City
City Visit to Nishiwaki, Japan Nishiwaki, commenting that it was an amazing visit. Stating that a formal
presentation about the trip is forthcoming,Mr. Corman noted that this
opportunity is available to any citizen, and that each delegate paid for his or her
own travel expenses.
RESOLUTIONS AND The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
ORDINANCES Council meeting of 4/28/2008 for second and final reading:
Utility: Low-Income Senior& An ordinance was read amending Chapter 1, Garbage, Chapter 2, Storm and
Disabled Utility Rates Surface Water, Chapter 4, Water, and Chapter 5, Sewers of Title VIII (Health
and Sanitation) of City Code by adjusting current utility discount rates for low-
income senior/disabled residents. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY
TAYLOR, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING ON 4/28/2008. CARRIED.
The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance#5370 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of alley right-of-way located south of
Vacation: Alley, Burnett Ave S S. Tobin St.,between Burnett Ave. S. and Williams Ave. S. (Friedman
& S 2nd St, Friedman Development, LLC;VAC-04-004). MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY
Development, VAC-04-004 ZWICKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
April 21, 2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 131
Ordinance#5371 An ordinance was read amending the 2008 Budget to transfer from Fund 303 to
Transportation: Logan Ave N Fund 316 for the Cedar River Trail Extension Project(Logan Ave.N. Bicycle
Bicycle Lane, Boeing, Budget Lane) expenses, and appropriating revenues in Fund 316 and authorizing
Amend expenses in that fund in the net amount of$111,875. MOVED BY PERSSON,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Council President Palmer thanked the volunteers, City staff, and all those who
Community Event: Piazza attended the Piazza Renton Spring Festival and participated in the Downtown
Renton Spring Festival Renton Poker Run on April 19. She stated that the turnout was good despite the
stormy weather.
AUDIENCE COMMENT In response to the question posed by Chuck Gitchel (Renton), Chief
Citizen Comment: Gitchel - Administrative Officer Covington indicated that the Committee of the Whole
Monopole Conditional Use will likely discuss the T-Mobile monopole conditional use permit appeal in
Permit Appeal, T-Mobile, CU- June.
07-065
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 8:06 p.m.
4911A4.L '4 /J)c7JJe71—)
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
April 21, 2008
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 21, 2008
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 4/28 Emerging Issues in Community and
(Palmer) 5:30 p.m. Economic Development;
Annexation Implementation Update;
1st Quarter Financial Report
*Council Conference Room*
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Briere)
•
FINANCE MON., 4/28 Vouchers;
(Persson) 4:30 p.m. 2008 Budget Amendment for Information
Technology Projects
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
(Parker)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Taylor)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 4/24 Transit Now Route 153 Partnership
(Corman) 4 p.m. Agreement with King County and Kent;
Naming Seahawks Way;
Local and Regional Transportation Issues
Update
UTILITIES
(Zwicker)
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council
Conference Room unless otherwise noted.
A' 0 CITY OF
o
Denis Law, Mayor
P�0-GILA*v tt
Wherectik, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special
day be set aside for the planting of trees; and
W herect -, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million
trees in Nebraska, and is now observed throughout the nation and the world; and
Wherea4; trees can reduce erosion of our precious topsoil, save heating and cooling costs, moderate
the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wildlife; and
W hev'ecw, trees are a renewable resource that give us paper, wood for our homes, and fuel for our fires,
as well as many other products; and
Wherecw, trees in our cities increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas,
and beautify our community; and
Wherea on Saturday, April 26, 2008,volunteers from neighborhoods, schools, businesses,and
• service clubs will help the City of Renton celebrate Arbor Day and Earth Day by planting trees, shrubs,
and groundcovers to enhance and beautify Renton's Heritage Park; and
Wherecc; in 1970, Senator Gaylord Nelson introduced legislation designating April 22 as a national
day to celebrate the earth, and called it Earth Day; and
NOW, 7 hese 'Ore, I, Denis Law, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim April 26,2008,to
be
�t rhar Day / Ecuv Day
in the City of Renton, and I encourage all citizens to join me in this special observance and to endeavor
to think and act ecologically, economically, and ethically to create a sustainable future.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed
this 21st day of April, 2008.
oft,•.1.;F4
Denis Law
i
Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington ?t <..'
N , ;R
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 '— g
OF THE C='E v
GcY �J CITY OF RENTON
Denis Law,Mayor
P r
W heereaik, Renton is blessed with hundreds of individuals of good will and good works who
play significant roles in bringing positive change to the lives of others through volunteerism; and
Whereao, the City of Renton's volunteers uphold the highest standards of civic duty, donating
their time, energy, and talents to helping others; and
Whereat, many volunteers enhance our quality of life through their service as members of
City of Renton boards, commissions, and advisory committees, which provide direction and
input for City policy and operations; and
W herecw, the annual observance of National Volunteer Week offers a chance to thank the
many volunteers whose work and compassion add so much to the quality of our lives, while
giving those who have never volunteered the opportunity to learn more about the many
organizations that could benefit from their time and talents; and
1111 Now, there e, I, Denis Law, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim April 27—
May 3, 2008, to be
1\1 V olwnteex W eek
in the City of Renton, and I encourage all members of the community to express appreciation to
volunteers across the city for their commitment to service and to promote the spirit of
volunteerism in our families and neighborhoods.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be
affixed this 21st day of April, 2008.
c1
Denis Law g t
Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington 1-
•
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 RE N ' ' 0
� AHEAD OF THE CUR\'I.
E 'd This paper contains 50%recycled material.30%post consumer
•
„Nry°
MONOPOLE I PUBLIC HEARING
April 21, 2008
Text Amendments for Monopole I in Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to
Wireless Regulations in All Zones
Changes in Standards for Monopole I
The existing development standards for Monopole I require a minimum lot size of one acre for
this facility in all residential zones, ranging from the Resource Conservation (RC) through the
Residential— 14 (R-14). Monopole structures of this type currently are permitted with a Hearing
Examiner Conditional Use Permit (HE-CUP) and they are required to have a minimum setback
of 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned property.
A Monopole I is defined as "A wireless communication support structure which consists of a
freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60') in height erected to support wireless
communications antennas and connecting appurtenances. "
• The proposal is to
• Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with
o Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from
adjacent residentially zoned properties.
o Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet
from adjacent residentially zoned properties.
o Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads.
The proposed change would allow the Monopole I structure to be more easily sited within
residential zones than is currently the case.
Housekeeping Amendments
Housekeeping amendments are needed to resolve inconsistencies within the existing code.
These changes clarify language, make the processing of applications consistent with the existing
requirements in the 4-2-080 Conditions for Zoning Use Tables, and add a cross reference to the
code sections where the decision criteria for use permits are published. These amendments also
change the names of reviewing staff to the more generalized "Reviewing Official". These
proposed changes make no changes in the regulatory content of this section of code, but increase
the consistency and accuracy of the code.
•
citoleiD el on . :
ounoii
fit>46 Yea ng
A
ritonamati
Docket 08-01 Text Amendments(ii
Monopole°in Resldentiai Zones CZ
Housekeeping Re_ Amendments Q•7
Regulations Clio Zones
Background&1T:1 Need
? dust standards changed l ••-
ggitagil
=6 is'denten.for greater coverage
rn.finis on smaller poles,conversion of exis ing
a 'j3
t=irri more les for esidential co erage
Gan i.se smaller poles
eel trial er an.area to site in esi.en ial-rea
0 lkif4jeCEVElitj availa.ie 3 c
Growth Managemen
Definition
•)a Monopole 0
Alreestanding supports c ure,iGSOZVelaft4li
(809 rn eig t erecte.to s pport wireless
communications antennas an.connecting
app rtenances.
1
Standards
Raza Property
9 acre to,size an all residentia ones,ranging from tre
'e •urce Goose anon RG)throug 1 e Residentia—
earl g Examiner Conditional. se'ermit GUP)
Minimum se back of 100 feet from-dja en
oned property
o Public Right-of-Way
Any rig it.1 way
orrizemgeggp
Proposal
low onopoe a cilaR SiE1
A.mintstrative CUP
.:s , re feet om.•lace:'residential oned
(0104
Alto flexi.ilit, *•l eann• xaminer G P
0 Setbacks•ess tha i 100 feet
Publico oaring
o Restrict locations public right-of-
<*- {•)designated arterial roads
Adminis rati eCUP
Housekeeping
Amendments
o
ft changes SO:Giregulato: content
Increase consistenc and ac racy
Make the rgulations consistent. it the-xis ing
Section 4-2-080 Conditions for onmg Ilse a
A.d.cross reference to t e code ections here the
decisional eria for use permits are pu•ttshed
Change the names of reviewing staff to the more
.eneralized'Reviewing Of icier
2
Steps Qt[?Vag
Docket OD
Planning aid Eevelopmen Committee
Recommendation
0 Council Action
UAWO�
3
•
,�y O DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
♦ ® ♦ CITY OF RENTON
�� o� MEMORANDUM APR 2. 2 2008
RECEIVED
GI I Y CLERK'S OFFICE
DATE: March 17, 2008
TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator NVe
STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager(x 6588)
SUBJECT: Docket 08-01: Text Amendment for Monopole I in
Residential Zones and Housekeeping Amendments to
Wireless Regulations in All Zones
ISSUE:
• Should the minimum lot size required for Monopole I facilities on private property in
residential zones be reduced from one acre to one half acre?
• Should Monopole I facilities in the public right-of-way be limited to designated arterials
in residential zones?
• Should the minimum setbacks from a Monopole I in a residentially zoned property be
retained at 100 feet with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit process, but be
eligible for reduction to less than 100 feet through a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use
Permit process?
• Should housekeeping amendments be made to reconcile differences between the zoning
notes and zoning use tables?
• Should the proposed amendments to the Wireless Regulations be processed as an
exception to the annual docket process?
RECOMMENDATION:
• Process the amendments as proposed through an exception to the annual docket process
to provide a timely resolution to the current problem of citing wireless facilities that
provide a reasonable network of service in residential areas.
• Allow Monopole I structures on residentially zoned sites of one half acre with
o Administrative Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are 100 feet or more from
adjacent residentially zoned properties.
o Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit when setbacks are less than 100 feet
from adjacent residentially zoned properties.
o Restrict locations within the public right-of-way to designated arterial roads.
• Reconcile inconsistencies within the existing code through housekeeping amendments.
H:\EDNSP\Title IV\Docket\2008\08-01 Wireless\Issue Paperv2.doc
Marcie Palmer,Council President •
Page 2 of 3 '
March 17,2008
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
Changes in Standards for Monopole I
The existing development standards for Monopole I require a minimum lot size of one acre for
this facility in all residential zones, ranging from the Resource Conservation (RC) through the
Residential— 14 (R-14). A Monopole I is defined as "A wireless communication support
structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60') in height
erected to support wireless communications antennas and connecting appurtenances."
Monopole structures of this type currently are permitted with a Hearing Examiner Conditional
Use Permit (HE-CUP) and they are required to have a minimum setback of 100 feet from
adjacent residentially zoned property. The proposal is to allow Monopole I structures on a one
half acre lot with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit(A-CUP) provided that they meet a
100 feet minimum setback from residential, but create some additional flexibility within the code
to allow a lesser setback with an HE-CUP. In the public right-of-way, Monopole I would only
be allowed on designated arterial roads.
The proposed change would allow the Monopole I structure to be more easily sited within
residential zones than is currently the case. At the present time, it is difficult for the wireless
providers to find appropriately located parcels of one acre. This situation is a result of the
urbanization of infill land in the City. As urban land is increasingly redeveloped for housing, it
will be more difficult to find parcels of sufficient size in locations that can provide the kind of
network needed to provide wireless service to customers throughout the City. Technology
changes in the wireless industry over the last ten years have resulted in more requests from
wireless providers for transmitters located on Monopole I facilities rather than the higher and
more intrusive Monopole II towers. As a result, there is increased demand for Monopole I
locations at a time when there are fewer large parcels of urban land.
Both permit processes require notice to contiguous property owners and owners within 300 feet
of the proposal. The Hearing Examiner Permit process requires a public hearing. The
Administrative Permit process may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner, while the HE-CUP is
appealed to the City Council.
Both processes require the Reviewing Official to approve based on the following criteria:
J. SPECIAL DECISION CRITERIA FOR WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES IN LIEU OF STANDARD CRITERIA:
The governing authority shall consider the following factors in determining
whether to issue a conditional use permit, although the governing authority may
waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these criteria if the
governing authority, concludes that the goals of RMC 4-4-140, Wireless
Communication Facilities, are better served thereby. (Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997)
1. Height of the proposed tower.
h:\ednsp\title iv\docket\2008\08-01 wireless\issue paperv2.doc
t
Marcie Palmer, Council President
Page 3 of 3 •
March 17,2008
2. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district
boundaries.
3. Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties.
4. Surrounding topography.
5. Surrounding tree coverage and foliage.
6. Design of the tower,with particular reference to design characteristics
that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness.
7. Proposed ingress and egress.
8. Potential noise, light and glare impacts.
9. Availability of suitable existing towers and other structures.
10. Compatibility with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards
of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan,
program,map or ordinance of the City. (Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997).
Housekeeping Amendments
Housekeeping amendments are needed to resolve inconsistencies within the existing code.
These changes clarify language, make the processing of applications consistent with the existing
requirements in the 4-2-080 Conditions for Zoning Use Tables, and add a cross reference to the
code sections where the decision criteria for use permits are published. These amendments also
change the names of reviewing staff to the more generalized"Reviewing Official". These
changes make no changes in the regulatory content of this section of code, but increase
proposed � Y
the consistency and accuracy of the code.
A draft of the proposed code amendments is shown in Attachment A.
Docket Exception
The docket process exception is requested because under the annual docket review cycle, this
code amendment could not be processed for approximately one year.
CONCLUSION:
The changes proposed are needed by wireless providers to continue providing service to Renton
residents.
h:\ednsp\title iv\docket\2008\08-01 wireless\issue paperv2.doc
ATTACHMENT A.
4-2-060 ZONING USE TABLE—USES ALLOWED IN ZONING DESIGNATIONS:
USES: RC R-1 R-4 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UC- I
N1
P.WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
Lattice towers support structures H48 AD47 AD47 AD47 H48 H48 AD47 H48 AD47 H48
Macro facility antennas AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 H
Micro facility antennas P P PPP P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Mini facility antennas P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 AD
Minor modifications to existing wireless P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P
communication facilities
P. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES (CONTINUED)
Monopole I support structures on private AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD46 P44 P44 P44 AD46 P44 P44 AD46 P44 AD46
property
Monopole I support structures on public AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 P44 P44 P44 P46 P44 P44 AD46 P44 AD46
right-of-way _
Monopole II support structures H48 AD47 AD47 AD47 H48 H48 AD47 H48 AD47 H48
Parabolic antennas—Large AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 AD45 H46 P44 P44 P44 AD46 P44 P44 AD46 P44 AD46
P=Permitted Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s)
Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restrictions; RMC 4-3-040C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement District; RMC 4-3-050
Critical Areas Regulations; RMC 4-3-090, Shoreline Master Program Regulations
3
p• l� 4k-take-xi'
e.6144A44-e-Afr
• 4-E-A00 ?
T • Mobile"®
April 21, 2008
City Council
The City of Renton
Renton City Hall—6th Floor
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Honorable Council Members:
T-Mobile has made a commitment to our customers to provide service in their homes as
well as cars. This requires locating facilities close to their homes and often in
residentially zoned locations. E-911 services are increasingly being made from wireless
phones, too, requiring in-home and mobile service. Utility pole replacement is an
excellent way of locating within residential areas.
While the step you are taking now is a necessary one, it does not fully solve the problem
of locating within residential areas. Lot sizes in residential areas are usually small and
preclude locating poles and equipment due to setbacks. Good sites with excellent tree
screening are often precluded due to these factors.
T-Mobile has reviewed the proposed text amendment and we support the text amendment
to allow Monopole I structures in residential zones on half acre lots with Administrative
Conditional Use Permit approval and with the capability of allowing flexibility to allow a
lesser setback with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. We believe this change
will provide flexibility needed to use some, but a very limited number, ofp arcels within
the city.
However, it should not be considered as a solution to providing residential service
throughout the city. The text amendment also does not address the need for additional
height if a monopole is located on a minimum %2 acre parcel.
We do not support the change to allow Monopole I structures only on designated arterial
roads. We have found that while there are utility poles that are useful on arterials roads,
there is not enough right of way space available to place our equipment even if that
equipment could be placed in an underground vault.
T-Mobile USA,Inc.
19807 North Creek Parkway North
Bothell,WA 98011
Arterial rights of way have many competing uses for the right of way space. Our need
for equipment to be placed in the right of way conflicts with the need for water, sewer,
sidewalks, underground power and telephone lines. So, the only way to fully utilize
arterial right of way structures is to allow equipment to be placed on residential property.
Using this scenario, T-Mobile would enter into a lease agreement with a private property
owner for placement of the equipment. The equipment could be placed in cabinets and
completely screened with landscaping, in an equipment shelter that could be built to
blend in with the existing buildings, or placed underground. This approach to using
utility poles is used very successfully in Sammamish, for instance.
Therefore, we would recommend that the Text amendment be approved excluding the
provision that allows Monopole I structures only on designated arterial roads. We would
also recommend that the city proceed to revise the code to allow additional height if a
pole is located on a %2+ acre parcel and to allow equipment on residential properties
subject to the review of the Hearing Examiner.
Thank you for considering these changes.
Si . -rely, r
\\ \ ,
Michae Cay 1\ \1\
Zonin Supervisor
19807 North Creek Parkway North
Bothell,WA 98011
i �I mil
lNrcO?
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PUBLIC HEARING
April 21, 2008
Development Agreement Cedar River Lightfoot Inc
The subject property, PID# 222305-9005, is a six-acre parcel with a two-story, five-bedroom
home built in 1911. This 6-acre parcel is part of the proposed 397-acre New Life — Aqua Barn
annexation. In 2007 Rick Lennon, property owner, requested Residential Medium Density
(RMD) designation with Residential 14 (R-14) zoning, subject to a development agreement
restricting development to no more than 45 dwelling units during the annual Comprehensive
Plan amendment review cycle. The City Council approved this request in December 2007. The
development agreement is now before the City for approval.
The subject 6-acre site was already reviewed by King County as Phase 2 of the Molasses Creek
Condominium development project, although it is not yet vested. According to the applicant, a
number of improvements have already been completed to allow this 6-acre parcel to be added to
• the existing condominium project to its west. These include the storm water control system of
Phase 1 that was designed and constructed to serve both Phase 1 and Phase 2. All utilities
(water, sewer, etc.) have been designed and constructed to serve Phase 2 and utility lines have
already been extended to the western edge of PID#222305-9004 to facilitate future connections.
Phase 2 is planned and has been designed for approximately 45 units with a density comparable
to that of Phase 1. The project was designed under King County zoning that allows a cluster
form of multi-family and condominium development consistent with Renton's R-14 zone
development standards.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor to execute the proposed development agreement with Cedar River
Lightfoot Inc. This agreement restricts the total number of units on the 6-acre site to 45
condominium units that are architecturally compatible with the character of Phase 1 of the
Molasses Creek Condominium development.
4110
ow, SI° et ton 0,0 ,
Ckou ei. :
INNIg IN ear
Development Agreement Cedar River
Lightfoot ley
Background
This 6-acre 0 397-acre(21319
Ij'Aqua annexation.
.)(regM(reproperty evtewed • •GSA
eff(jciZEND
P-reel desi nated Me•i m Bens'y Residential wth R
a
C3Atiewal by City Go ncil 1 Q con.ition
*eve opment agreement limiting de si o 45
o he develo 4 moot agreement OM r before igza
(tivey ap.rova
l.
Annexation Boundary and
Cedar amo,Lightfoot CPJ.G:.
22
....
1
Development Pro ect
fir-viewed b•( Goon of Phase
o asses Greek Condominium •e e owl-RI
project cluster provisions ClAn ealigo
o Designed(bgZeNIM
Shared Improvements existing condominium
project(b the WO
agilleMcontro @Mild Phase tl
Need CO2 Development
Agreement
I4r granted because to al3 closest' • •
(IAD Gountywil/Azmilrootownho se
P ase m Molasses 02Gili project would LID
conforming
o WI hout(tin development agreement,ei
maximum density C•Qapproxrnately 86eire
mightpfeasible da project re-design
Development Agreement
ut- :3
0 Restricts(DCS n tuberchatiticZlInel.
enmitmoog condominium Oa
0 Establishes gifigriGzoningWI rii43
2
•
Recommendation
0 Authorize gie Mayor S-moi - Q
proposed •eveloprnent agreement
Cedar River Lig foot
3
ti`0( O ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND
;; , LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
11P' MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 21, 2008
TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Denis Law, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
Oakesdale Avenue SW will be closed under I-405 Tuesday, April 22 through Thursday, April 24
from approximately 8 p.m. to 5 a.m., to allow the contractor to hang three large girders for the
new I-405 southbound bridge over Oakesdale Avenue SW. Due to the enormous length of the
girders (110 feet, 130 feet, and 170 feet), WSDOT is working with its public information staff to
photograph and video record the installation of the girders. The Renton Reporter has also been
notified. During the road closure traffic will be rerouted to alternate routes along Lind Avenue
SW and Longacres Drive.
ac&d
Mayor and Honorable Council: _A/_BOO?
I want to thank you for allowing me a few minutes to share my concerns surrounding events
in our Renton residential neighborhood last Saturday,April 19th,2008.
I speak to you tonight as a citizen and as a 30 year veteran of the Fire Service. I understand
what it takes to get that rig to that scene and initiate that service. It would have been
difficult in my neighborhood,and I suspect surrounding neighborhoods,on Saturday and
probably with great delay. It is not simply a"parking problem"...it is about emergency
services access and potential delays in service. It is about people respecting the law,any law,
and there being consequences to such disregard.
First I want to say I respect and admire the City of Renton Police Department. I am not sure
what happened on Saturday
For six(6) hours,our neighborhood's public street(South 53"' Place)turned into a parking lot
due to a large event at the Sikh Temple on Talbot Road South. Cars were parked illegally on
our street—in some places 3 deep from the curb—and all three(3)fire hydrants and mail
boxes were blocked by illegally parked vehicles. In addition, vehicles trying to find an
alternative route off the closed and/or congested Talbot Road South were inadvertently
turning onto our street and then could not get turned around due to the illegally parked
vehicles.
I'm not sure how much notice the City received for this particular event. There seemed to be
some private naggers'wearing orange vests located on Talbot road along with orange cones
and "ROAD CONSTRUCTION"warning signs(which actually caused some confusion). Of all
events and parking issues created by the Temple in the past 4 years,this was the most
chaotic I have experienced.
We made multiple calls to 911, beginning around 10:00 AM. We were basically told there
was nothing the City could do as they were overwhelmed, not equipped to tow all the
vehicles and doing the best they could. We then asked if vehicles could be ticketed since
they couldn't be towed(due to the volume of cars). Concerns regarding access to our
neighborhood for emergency vehicles and blocked fire hydrants seemed of little concern. My
name and number was not taken by the 911 Call Receiver during the initial call, so I assume
that there was not a "call for service"created. During a subsequent call to 911,we were
advised there was a"Contingency Emergency Response Plan"that existed should there be an
emergency incident in our neighborhood. We were also advised if we were concerned our
driveway would be blocked,that WE should park elsewhere. At no time did we see a police
vehicle patrolling our street or writing tickets although cars continued to block our street
until 4:30 PM. It was as though we were forgotten.°'
y/tyog
I understand how the system works(a 911 call is placed, "call for service" incident generated,
call dispatched by priority[maybe held until a unit was available] response made,call close),
I did expect that eventually a unit would begin sorting through the parking issues after the
initial chaos,and at minimal to tow vehicles blocking fire hydrants and to begin writing
tickets for the rest. But that did not happen and this situation existed in our street for 6
hours. I wonder why in this case 911 calls appear not to be followed-up. In the emergency
service industry it is not unusual to have incidents(such as major storms)that create high call
volume that all require follow through.
One frustration is that our neighborhood has worked to educate the neighbors and the
Temple for years on the importance of parking legally as to allow access for emergency
vehicles and not to block fire hydrants. It has been a struggle but we feel we reached
compliance last year. Some people might feel these type calls are minor"parking issues"and
fail to understand the bigger picture of emergency response access. They believe they will
have time to move their illegal vehicle if an emergency would occur. I know from experience
that is not true. It only takes one second,one decision for a life changing event to happen.
Unfortunately,the message the City sent on Saturday is that it is okay to disrespect the law
and there are no consequences.
l would respectfully ask the City to take steps to insure that our residential streets and our
homes are kept safe—especially after we call 911 and specifically ask for help. If there was a
Contingency Emergency Response Plan, I would very much like to have a copy so that we,the
taxpaying residents of the area, understand the response we can expect should we have an
emergency.
The Temple is our neighbor. I respect that they have large events. I understand and
appreciate the ongoing community concerns over the years about parking, illegal firework
discharge and public assembly occupancy loads. I would encourage the City to aggressively
work cooperatively with them and those of us who live in the area to insure that events are
successful,safe and legal for all.
Thank You
Paul Witt
617 S. 53rd PL, Renton,WA 98055
206-999-4002
..
5
,.,-,,i'At,
N .tom 1..
--....-,� ,;;..r % - ",,,,,,,-.,t h�y� ;"-o-�1 x 4 4 rte.... _
„fl
7-
- „,.,,,,,jalr,„ , ,,_-,A;.-„--,,---:-,:c;”; ::::, ',„:::71" :41'
ti ce'- i
` -- , .>
it -.
f
07,7
ti
c @ }s td « } 1 az.
---� ylWt f�.. _
./' ".
r ��x a
x ..
--. -
,4y- '.'.-....',..t..- -.'
r"' i^tom. ,x�
y�Y'�'fi y
• III �;, II 1 ' 1i '-4 4 a, 1 ..:
a ,` i I I 1 II III II III I,' ,,N � { FI '�.. r
•
I � •
®o®sA' 11, ' sa, t il r i -'
Una.�I \1IjI • i '~1�,a h a,
`` IiI
IIP.
i
'Imam= I I rt
I'
it
I i t.
iI
h
r)77/7.)'/ / . /,..,::,,,,,/:,, .:,,,,F, a
is r/ ' d�9u ,a..,' - .y1�^E°<rj!itt'
"}. -• is 9 4.„4„,
:d'a•'' . .
std
fi t o ,..f•,, ,, 'Mf` 1
i y� i, wry.
!' ir✓
',yr y,�..,
,. 1 /l/l1/lll//77717 V
� ,
co, I •
111 } '• I 1.,.
1i\ 1 •aoeaesrazan ,,,;•,-;:::-.........;;,,4':
,
,ascan l,�i � _®I\\\
II� s. '�.
e r; � ,
1 I� \I 1 t�` i � I
f', x111'111',1 11 'I I 1' LI \\
I 1 l I i '•'-! .. '
` I wl`,
. _:,,i1,\ 1
ISEV•• 1\I 1 111'i!:.',1,
I
,'Ns '
`
N5 .o_ill i111 I� �„
.�.. rk\a 11!I'11111II
��, rilil
•
,, 1'I o iki:;.1,°).
.4
-+u
/r /
eV,ao08'
Honorable Mayor Denis Law Jon E. Troxel
City of Renton PO Box 1864
1055 So. Grady Way Friday Harbor
Renton,WA 98055 WA 98250
April 19,2008
Subject: The legislature finds that inadequately controlled noise adversely affects the health, safety and
welfare of the people, the value of property, and the quality of the environment (quoted verbatim from
WA State Regs.)
Dear Mayor Denis Law and City of Renton Council,
I have been an apartment owner in the Highlands for over 29 years. I am proud to be a member of the
community, as displayed by how we maintain our apartment and respect our tenants' rights to a quality
peaceful home. Unfortunately, my tenants' rights to a peaceful home have been continuously disrupted
by the tavern immediately next door.
There have been almost 30 police dispatches since January (see attached) in regard to Joe's Bar and Grill
(formerly the Ron-Dee Voo Tavern), 2621 NE Sunset Blvd. These dispatches range from thefts, loud
music, yelling, unwanted subject arrested, threats, intoxication, disorderly subject, fight in parking lot,
trespass,arrest for theft, excessive noise from bar,request for aid,burglary,and more! This triple decade
pattern must stop and my tenants have a right to have WA State noise laws enforced.
I now have two apartments vacant as a direct result of the excessive noise from Joe's Bar and Grill. I
have women, children, and families who cannot sleep on a regular basis. The tavern (on land originally
zoned residential)has Live Music, Karaoke, and Live DJ's depending upon the night. My tenants are at
their wits end trying to enjoy their right to a peaceful home.
I request that the Mayor, Council, and Police Chief develop a plan to permanently enforce the
Washington State noise laws and rights of my tenants. Please, once and for all side with the rights of the
11 families, including some with children, to a peaceful domicile. I look forward to working with you to
that end. In addition, in future noise calls I would suggest the officers always approach from the south
end of our alley and park in our parking lot first, before approaching the Tavern, for this is the area my
tenants live,not a slow drive-by on Sunset.
Sincerely,
9r--- 4-7---(
Jon E.Troxel
Owner
Attachments
PS Is the outdoor Beer Garden,that appeared at Joe's Bar and Grill last summer, up against the sidewalk
a permitted endeavor? Are patrons allowed to smoke there as well?
From: "Cyndie Parks" <CParks@ci.renton.wa.us>
Subject: Re: Please send data
Date: April 16, 2008 12:35:28 PM PDT
To: "Bellingham Chart Sales" <sales@tidesend.com>
Per your request -911 calls to Joe's Bar & Grill at 2621 NE Sunset Blvd for the last 90 days. I spoke
w/Terri Vickers, Business Watch Coordinator, and advised her of our conversation. She will also receive
a copy of this email, as will Cmdr. Paul Cline.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
01-04 / Disp @ 8:38 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 8:38 p.m.: Subject wanting contact f/officer regarding
threatening messages received on his phone.
01-09 / Disp @ 8:18 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 8:20 p.m.: Employee calling regarding unwanted subject at
location. Suspect arrested.
01-11 / Disp @ 10:45 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 22:47 p.m.: Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar.
Officers made contact and warned business to keep noise level down.
01-12 / Disp @ 1:38 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 1:39 a.m.: Employee calling regarding theft of purse.
Officers made contact w/employee.
01-13 / Disp @ 1:52 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 1:55 a.m.: Employee calling regarding unwanted subject at
location. Officers made contact with suspect; FIR card completed.
01-19 / Disp @ 11:16 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 11:21 p.m.: Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar.
Officers made contact and warned business to keep noise level down.
01-30 / Disp @ 12:31 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 12:45 a.m.: Subject calling order violation. Officer made
contact with reporting party.
02-02/ Disp @ 2:01 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 2:03 a.m.: Subject calling regarding several subjects yelling
at location. Officer made contact at business.
02-03 / Disp @ 11:23 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 11:25 p.m.: Subject calling regarding threats made by
known acquaintance. Officers made contact with reporting party.
02-16/Disp @ 1:11 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 1:14 a.m.: Employee calling regarding fight in parking lot.
Subject was refused service due to intoxication level. Officers made contact with disruptive subject.
02-21 /Disp @ 9:58 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 9:58 p.m.: Employee calling unwanted subject at location.
Subject was refused service and got upset as he was locked out of bar. Officers made contact with
subject and he was arrested.
03-01 / Disp @ 12:03 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 12:05 a.m.: Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar.
Officers arrived and determined level was not unreasonable. Officers advised on-site security to make
sure nobody was loitering outside and/or holding the door open. DJ was cooperative and turned the
bass and music down anyway.
03-01 / Disp @ 9:38 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 9:42 p.m.: Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar.
Officers made contact at location.
03-01 / Disp @ 10:20 p.m.; Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar. Officers dispatched but were
re-routed for priority incident.
03-01 / Disp @ 11:47 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 11:49 p.m.: Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar.
Sergeant contact owner and warned him music was too loud.
03-08 / Disp @ 6:43 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 6:46 p.m.: Employee calling regarding disorderly subject at
location. Officers made contact at location.
!a
03-08/Disp @ 11:45 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 11:52 p.m.: Subject calling upset because he's been
trespassed f/bar. Wants to speak to sergeant on-duty. Sgt made contact w/subject at location.
03-15/Disp @ 9:53 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 9:57 p.m.: Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar.
Officers arrived and determined noise level was not unreasonable. Security stated they would ask the
band to turn it down if possible anyway.
03-16/Disp @ 12:24 a.m.; Ofcr. arrived @ 12:24 a.m.: Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar.
Officers made contact with security who will give band final warning. If any further complaints are
received, security will shut the band down. Security very cooperative.
03-28/Disp @ 9:01 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 9:03 p.m.: Employee reporting theft of services by known
customer. Officer made contact with suspect who was arrested.
03-29/Disp @ 3:12 a.m.; Commercial burglary alarm.
03-29IDisp @ 11:42 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 11:45 p.m.: Neighbor calling regarding excessive noise f/bar.
Officer made contact at location.
03-30/Disp @ 1:18 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 1:22 a.m.: Subject calling requesting aid car. Officers arrived
-subject declined aid.
04-05/Disp @ 1:33 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 1:38 a.m.: Neighbor calling regarding loud music f/bar. Officer
arrived and parked in parking lot for a time-did not witness excessive noise from bar.
04-11/Disp @ 10:02 p.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 10:05 p.m.: Neighbor calling regarding excessive noise f/bar.
Stated subjects are being loud in parking lot. Officers arrived on location and did not observe any
disruptive subjects in parking lot, no excessive noise.
04-11/On-view by officer @ 10:30 p.m.: Officer looking for trespassed subject. Subject not located.
04-12/Disp @ 12:13 a.m.; Ofcrs arrived @ 12:16 a.m.: Neighbor calling regarding dispute at bar location
-possible 10 subjects involved. Officers arrived and made contact with several subjects nearby.
Several subjects identified and FIR'd.
CPC Parks
Renton Police Department
(424) 430-7521
Honorable Mayor Kathy Koelker-Wheeler Jon E.Troxel
City of Renton PO Box 1864
1055 So. Grady Way Friday Harbor,WA 98250
Renton,WA 98055
March 22,2004
Subject: Ron-Dee Voo Tavern,2621 NE Sunset Blvd,Renton,WA
Dear Mayor Koelker-Wheeler,
Congratulations for becoming the new Mayor of Renton. I trust your experiences will be
both challenging and personally rewarding.
I have been a property owner in Renton for over 25 years. I own an 11 unit apartment
located at 922 Glennwood Ave. NE. I invite you to see our pride of ownership building,
which is the best one on our block. We care about our tenants and their rights to a
pleasant well-run apartment building,which offers a comfortable home to their families.
During the over 25 years of ownership of this building we have had numerous complaints
by our tenants about the Ron-Dee Voo Tavern which is located immediately next door to
our multifamily neighborhood which is full of children and hard working citizens of your
fine city.
We have cooperated with the tavern owners throughout the years by dealing directly with
them (and indirectly through the Renton Police Dept.) The following is a list of 25 years
of multiple intrusions by the tavern: excessive noise between 10PM and 2AM (when
most people sleep next door), trash placed in our dumpster by the Tavern management,
beer bottles littered on our property by the customers of the Tavern, urination on our
property by Tavern customers (as recent as last weekend), Tavern customers sleeping
between the back of the Tavern and our fence for months on end(see attached letter dated
8-29-02 to Chief of Police Anderson), Tavern patrons (later determined to be Convicted
Felons who jumped Parole) living in their derelict cars and vans on the neighbor's
property (Dr. Vukov's),excessively loud music and tavern noise to the extreme (resulting
in a citation by Renton Police which resulted in a"criminal citation and a guilty plea for
Breach of Peace" in the summer of 2002 (see letter dated 4-17-03 by Mayor Jesse
Tanner- attached), live bands with the music blaring at excessive levels coming out the
propped open front door, fist fights of which Renton Police have had to respond, junk
behind the Tavern piled high for months, Tavern patrons ramming our fence and
knocking it over in the black of night, beer bottles recently and in the past deliberately
thrown at the side of our building by Tavern patrons (creating fear in a single mother,just
last week, who asked her young son to come sleep in her bedroom that night), excessive
litter of beer bottles on our property due to outdoor public consumption of alcohol by
Tavern patrons, threats and cat calls to single women in my apartment who are coming
home late from work (a female tenant got so frightened last spring she moved as a direct
result of harassment from Tavern patrons (a great tenant who called our building home
.4
for the previous two years, see email from 4-14-03 to The Mayor and Council attached),
and the list goes on.
During the past few months the Ron-Dee Voo has had Kerioke on Sunday nights. The
singing and music really gets going between 10PM and 1:30 AM, creating such loud
noise my tenants cannot sleep. My manager has called the Renton Police numerous times
and complained. Sometimes the patrol cars just go by slowly and nothing gets done.
One gets the feeling that an officer would rather not issue a citation if he or she could
avoid it,because it's easier to give verbal warnings than go to court to enforce the laws.
My manager was also directed by the Police to call the Tavern directly. When she calls
the Tavern she only gets a phone answering machine, often the music gets even louder
after she leaves a message asking them to turn the music down. This has gotten out of
hand over the past 25+ years and we should not have to put up with this nuisance for the
next 25 years. We need to resolve this matter permanently. I now have 4 empty
apartments which were a direct result of Tavern generated excessive music noise, patron
yelling,urinations through our fence,patron alcohol consumption outside the tavern,beer
bottles thrown over the fence, and crass behavior directed by Tavern patrons toward
innocent apartment dwellers who have small children. I wonder what the City of Renton
would do to my apartment operations if my tenants acted like these tavern patrons? Does
a tavern have special rights just because it's a tavern?
of this letter,you can tell I m at the end of the road. Our attempts
Obviously,by the tone
to work with the Tavern and with the Renton Police have resulted in only temporary
successes, not permanent solutions. The Tavern is "grandfathered" into our residential
neighborhood. There is a non-conforming use of which a Conditional Use Permit would
be required today. A map on the wall in the Planning Dept. even shows the zoning for
the Tavern to be Multi-Family,of which I am uncertain what the zoning really is.
I request that the City of Renton permanently accept responsibility for this unreasonable
and often illegal situation. I do not want any more warnings given to the Tavern; they
have had over 25 years of that. I want action, and a permanent long-term solution
governed by the City, not innocent bystanders, who are forced to complain till they are
out of breath.
My ability to live is based upon the sweat equity I have put into my 11-unit apartment for
the past 25+ years. I now have four units empty with possibly more to come as a result
of excessive noise and illegal actions by the Ron-Dee Voo Tavern. This has become a
real financial burden. I rely on this income to pay my bills and feed my family of four,
just like any other working man or woman relies on their income.
Yes, the Tavern is a"non conforming" use to the extreme. It is now time for the City of
Renton to exercise any and all their legal rights toward the Ron-Dee Voo Tavern, on the
behalf of innocent people and their rights to a peaceful safe residence and on behalf of
property owners investing in the Renton community.
� I
We are very tired of making phone call after phone call to 911. Many tenants are
reluctant to call 911 because they "do not want to get involved" and they fear retaliation.
They would rather move and get a free month's rent somewhere else, for it's not their
problem. It has become my problem for too long, and I believe it is the City of Renton's
responsibility to invoke a permanent solution, which relates to legitimate enforceable
statutes! We do not want a temporary fix for three months, because the problems will
start up again and it takes another year to get things quiet again. This 25-year cycle must
come to an end now.
When prospective tenants come to view one of the four empty apartments and they ask
the manager: "Does the Ron-Dee Voo Tavern causes any problems? " What is she
supposed to say? "Yes, for 25 years and the City of Renton has not been effective in
enforcing the City and State laws. We have the same problems we had 25 years ago,but
now they are even worse!"
I appeal to and respect the new Mayor. I have heard you plan to upgrade the Highlands.
I support your efforts in earnest and am happy to be of assistance to that end. Please help
me, the families who reside in my building, and immediate neighboring apartments, find
a permanent solution to this very difficult situation.
Sincerely,
94---
6 4111
Jon E.Troxel
Owner,Sunset Vista Apts.
Cc: Police Chief Anderson
Don Persson,Council President
Terri Briere,Council President Pro-tern
Councilwoman Toni Nelson
Councilman Dan Clawson
Councilman Randy Corman
Councilman Denis Law
Director of Planning Neal Watts
Washing State Liquor Control Board
4
Tenants Jon Troxel,Owner
Sunset Vista Apts. c/o Edith Johnson Mgr.,Sunset Vista Apts.
922 Glennwood Ave NE Apt. 10
Renton,WA 98056 922 Glennwood Ave NE
Renton,WA 98056
March 12,2004
Subject: Ron Dee Voo Noise and Patron activities.
Dear Tenant,
Many thanks for your continued tenancy at Sunset Vista Apts.
Lately the Ron Dee Voo Tavern has been having Karaoke on Sunday evenings. We have
had numerous tenant complaints to Rod and Edith about excessive music noise between
10PM and 1:30AM. This is unacceptable, for you have a right to a peaceful home, a
good nights rest,and a safe home.
If you hear any excessively loud music that disturbs you in any way, see tavern patrons
drinking in pubic, patrons causing a nuisance or litter, please dial 911 immediately and
report the incident! We will fix this once and for all. I need your support and legitimate
calls to 911 if there are problems.
I am working with the City of Renton's Mayor and Police Chief in regard to this matter.
We will address the City Council March 22'. I have owned Sunset Vista for over 25
years and have worked with the Tavern's on-going problems for too many years. They
never seem to care. I am going to demand the City provide a permanent solution to this
problem.
Thanks in advance. If possible, tell Edith or Rod that you called 911 and why. If you
have to call 911 late at night please inform Edith and Rod the next day at a reasonable
hour.
We are here to support you and this will be resolved.
Sincerely,
9,6y
Jon E.Troxel
Owner,Sunset Vista Apts.
Cc: Mayor Kathy Koelker-Wheeler
Police Chief Anderson
Washington State Liquor Control Board
•'• CITY OF RENTON
Mayor
Jesse Tanner
April 17,2003
Jon Troxel
922 Glenwood Avenue NE •
Renton,WA 98056
Dear Mr. Troxel:
I reviewed your e-mail complaint regarding noise disturbances from the Ron-Dee-Voo Tavern
and referred it to Police Chief Garry Anderson for investigation.
Chief Anderson informed me that, subsequent to your e-mail,he spoke with Sgt. Frazier who
then contacted you. I understand that you and your tenants have been asked to call 911 to report
these disturbances and to request contact by the responding officer so the complaint is
appropriately documented for use in prosecution, if necessary.
I am aware that you, Sgt.Frazier, and members of the Police Department's Community Patrol
Response Team,worked on this issue last summer. These efforts resulted in a criminal citation
and a guilty plea for Breach of Peace.
The Police Department will continue to respond to and work towards resolving these complaints.
In addition to reporting,to the apartment management staff, you and your tenants can assist by
phoning 911 to report illegal activity as it occurs and requesting contact by the responding
officer. Successful investigations and prosecutions are more effectively coordinated when the
offense is reported at the time of occurrence, and not after the fact.
Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention.
S. cerely,
e0141-
Jesse Tanner
Mayor
03-029/JT:mp
cc: Renton City Council
Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer
Garry Anderson,Chief of Police
Sunset Vista Apts.
Apt. 10
922 Glennwood Ave NE
Renton,WA 98056
April 14,2003
Subject: Noise or problems with Ron Dee Voo Tavern and any other noise or
disturbance problems from other sources.
Dear Tenant,Sunset Vista Apts.
I wanted to a take a moment to share withou the fact that we lost a longterm tenant
Y just
due to their inability to sleep due to the noise generated by the Tavern. In addition, the
tenant did not like the public drinking and activities along the fence at all hours of the
day.
Y
We regret the loss of this quality tenant due to the activities generated by the Tavern.
Our objective is to resolve this matter, and the only way we can make progress is for you
to advise the managers Rod and Edith in apartment 10 whenever you feel there is an
unreasonable problem. Please call them anytime you find the noise generated by the
Tavern is excessive or there is public drinking along the fence or any other activity,
which is inappropriate.
Edith and Rod will call 911 on your behalf and we will need to keep good records if we
are to resolve this matter once and for all. We are looking for a long-term solution to the
problem,not just short term fixes.
Your apartment is your home and you have the right to peace and quite. We want to be
certain your rights are not violated.
Please keep us informed. Edith and Rod's phone number is 917-2293. If for some
reason they do not answer,please leave your name,time you called and what happened.
Sincerely,
94_6 4-71-1'
Jon E.Troxel
Owner
From:Jon Troxel<jon@tidesend.com>
Date:Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:25:28 PM US/Pacific
To:jtanner@ci.renton.wa.us
Cc:council@ci.renton.wa.us ganderson@ci.renton.wa.us
Subject: Breach of Peace Complaint about the Ron Dee Voo Tavern
Dear Honorable Mayor Tanner and City Council,
Subject: Years of disturbance from the Ron Dee Voo Tavern located at 2621 NE Sunset Blvd. (located immediately next
door to my apartment building)
I have been the owner of a quality 11 unit apartment located at 922 Glennwood Ave NE. My apartment is accessed by the
alley between Sunset and 9th NE. There are about six apartments on this block and we take great pride in our building by
making it the most attractive on the block. We make every effort to provide a reasonable home for our tenants.
Unfortunately we have a major problem. During the twenty plus years of ownership we have had numerous complaints
from our tenants about the excessive noise from live or recorded music at unreasonable hours coming from the Ron Dee
Voo Tavern. During my 20+years of ownership we have had bums sleeping behind the tavern, documented waste being
placed in our dumpster, numerous beer cans and bottles littered on my property by tavern customers, noise problems,
fights which required police attention, pubic drinking at all hours,destruction of our fence by tavern customers, and an on-
going noise problem.
Last summer was the worst ever. We had 12-13 complaints about noise from the tavern until a citation was actually
issued by the Renton Police Dept. Since then,tenants have complained to my manager about the unreasonable noise
and vagrants along the fence. The most recent complaint came from a single woman who cannot sleep due to live music
and recorded music and feels intimidated when she comes home at night. She has been a quality tenant for over four
years. Finally the tavern noise got to her on St. Patrick's Day when the Ron Dee Voo had another live hand. She called
the police,for she could not sleep. The police responded and the short term problem was resolved that evening. She has
since given notice to vacate her apartment as a direct result of the noise and vagrants at the tavern. She said she felt
threatened when she came home from work at night by"the bums who drink alcohol outside, curse, laugh and talk loudly,
smoke, and exhibit obnoxious behavior." She has had many sleepless nights due to breach of peace, and said she's
called the police 4-5 times.
This is the second documented tenant I have lost in the past year alone as a direct result of the noise and inappropriate
activities which the Ron Dee Voo Tavern generates. Another tenant just recently moved from a corner bedroom to the
other bedroom in her unit,for she could not sleep because of the noise from the tavern next door.
My apartment houses 11 families, and this is their home. They have a right to peace and quite. My desire is to have a
permanent fix to this problem and not another twenty years of complaints which get lip service.
I commend the actions and results by Sergeant Fraser of the Renton Police Dept. He took a personal interest in our plight
last summer, and after the 12-13 complaints,during a three month period,set-up a sting operation which finally resulted in
a citation for breach of peace, and a resultant plea of guilty by the tavern manager.
It costs a minimum of$2000 to turnover an apartment. I have now had two quality tenants lost as a result of damages
caused by the tavern's inappropriate activities. I cannot afford this substantial financial loss and my tenants have a right to
a peaceful domicile.
Thanks in advance for any and all support you can offer. Unfortunately, I cannot attend your council meeting tonight, but
would appreciate your discussing how to resolve this matter once and for all for the citizens of Renton.
Sincerely,
Jon E.Troxel
TP.OXEL...
IRE.: APT t••4O, a /NOTICE._ To
VISTA /
tr. t.'.) 14/Wt 12)E.LIV-E.R.Ein
A JRt 1t VZJTE. t
Pizerei sE isr7Ay St . ZaSS,
Si\rE.N.) •TERPri_tiA.T•fh.r.
AP_E. A FOLL.C.Ave.S.
i.
i\ScsE. CiN11)-AC_) "Re.:\N iitsa
xT
IX1R... 1-C1 APT- --e)LD LAe L. TC
St Riz:P
e.. cni\la--REGA‹rit..C. •
Bai-t D
Q .
t-4 LT. 2.1-c4$71.1. N.N
• / /
•-"a.SELY E..
L,ZAI C-)741(kinftrzor
Jon and Nancy Troxel
Sunset Vista Apartments,owners
922 Glennwood Ave. NE
Renton,WA 98056
Chief of Police,Garry Anderson
1055 South Grady Way
Renton,WA 98055 29 August,2002
Dear Chief Anderson,
I am writing to request assistance in removing vagrants living in a vacant lot on Harrington across
from the parking lot of our apartment building and also camping in the wooded area around the building at
Sunset Vista Apartments,922 Glennwood Ave.NE.Renton,Washington.
My husband and I own Sunset Vista Apartments, an eleven unit building,and lately we have had
numerous complaints from tenants of the disturbance created by the frequently intoxicated vagrants squatting on
private property nearby.
Our apartment manager,Edith Johnson,who is an older woman,does not feel safe going in and out of
the building alone and has called the police department about the disturbance. We have several empty
apartments at this time,which we are trying to rent, and we feel that prospective tenants are clearly deterred by
the presence of the street people sleeping in the woods around our building.
In the past two years we have put thousands of dollars into renovating the individual apartments in an
endeavor to attract a caliber of tenant who will care about the appearance and quality of a well-kept apartment
building. My concern is first for the safety and contentment of my tenants, and second that my property will not
be so devalued that no one will rent in our building. I cannot afford to run a building at a loss.
Our apartment building is next to a tavern,which does not help matters.We have had to make complaints about
the noise there,particularly at closing time.The vagrants living in the empty lot are often seen hanging out
behind the tavern in the night and in the early morning. Our manager has to pick up bottles and trash everyday
from around the property line,as well as the parking lot.
I am asking specifically that the vagrants be removed and permanently discouraged from camping out
on vacant lots and parking lots in this apartment building neighborhood.Thank you for your help in this matter.
I appreciate everything you do to keep the Renton Highlands a safe and comfortable neighborhood.
I can be contacted at 360-468-3465,and our apartment manager,Edith,in apartment#3,can be contacted at
425-917-2293.
Sincerely,
Nancy Troxel
Mailing address
PO Box 1864
Friday Harbor,WA 98250
i
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: I "kJ x
• Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk April 21, 2008
Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Bid opening on April 15, 2008, for CAG-08-038, Correspondence..
City Center Parking Garage Police Substation Project Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Staff Recommendation Study Sessions
Bid Tabulation Sheet (five bids) Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
Council concur Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
411 Expenditure Required... $219,680.70 Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget Part of overall Benson Hill City Share Total Project
Communities Annexation
Budget
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $150,000
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following
three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there
were no irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by M.J.
Ness Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of$219,680.70.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid submitted by M.J. Ness Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of$219,680.70.
A
I
• Y
Uti �� COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
'g MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 16, 2008
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
FROM: Michael Nolan, Facilities Coordinator
SUBJECT: Award of Bid, Substation at Parking Garage
We would like to submit the results of the following project bid for Council's review and
approval:
• For Council Date: April 21, 2008
• Project Name: Substation at Parking Garage, CAG 08-038
• Project Summary: This project involves tenant improvement build-out of the ground floor
"retail space" on the west side of the City Center Parking Garage for use as a police
411 substation.
• Bid Opening Date: April 15, 2008
• Number of Bidders: Five (5)
• Apparent Low Bidder: M.J. Ness Construction Co., Inc.
• Apparent Low Bid: $219,680.70
• Engineer's Estimate: $150,000.00
• Project Budget: This project is part of the overall Benson Hill Annexation budget.
• Funding Source: The Benson Hill Annexation budget (state reimbursement).
• Bid Irregularities: None
• Staff Recommendation: Award the contract for the Substation at Parking Garage to the
apparent low bidder, M.J. Ness Construction Co., Inc. via council concur.
Cc: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer
Mike Bailey,Finance/IS Administrator
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
III
Bid Award Memo,Substation doc
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: City Center Parking Garage Police Substation; CAG-08-038 •
DATE: April 15,2008
FORMS
BID
BIDDER Bid Triple Addenda
Bond Form 2
Apus Construction, Inc. X X X $234,895.00
4- 164th Ave. NE
Bellevue, WA 98008
Yury Palatnik
Lincoln Construction, Inc. X X X $276,712.00
PO Box 730
Spanaway, WA 98387
Daniel C. Lincoln
M.J. Ness Construction Co., Inc. X X X $219,680.70
PO Box 3127
Redmond, WA 98073-3127
Steven J. Ness
Mike Werlech Construction,Inc. X X X $230,976.00 •
PO Box 46579
Seattle, WA 98146
Michael Werlech
United Pacific Structures, Inc. X X X $262,690.00
PO Box 1640
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
Jim Bozich
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: 5150,000.00
•
LEGEND:
Forms:Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage
4.
1.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: / _' •
1111! Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk April 21, 2008
Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Bid opening on April 16, 2008, for CAG-08-037, Correspondence..
Police Locker Rooms Project Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Staff Recommendation Study Sessions
Bid Tabulation Sheet (five bids) Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
Council concur Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
iiiExpenditure Required... $245,895.20 Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget Part of overall Benson Hill City Share Total Project
Communities Annexation
Budget
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $450,000
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following
three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there
were no irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by H.S.
Builders, Inc. in the amount of$245,895.20.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid submitted by H.S. Builders, Inc. in the amount of$245,895.20.
III
4.
• Y
(j,e COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 16, 2008
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
FROM: Michael Nolan, Facilities Coordinator
SUBJECT: Award of Bid, Police Locker Rooms
We would like to submit the results of the following project bid for Council's review and
approval:
• For Council Date: April 21, 2008
• Project Name: Police Locker Rooms, CAG 08-037
• Project Summary: This project involves remodeling the second floor of Renton City Hall to
expand the police locker rooms to accommodate the hiring of new officers.
I 41) • Bid Opening Date: April 16, 2008
• Number of Bidders: Five (5)
• Apparent Low Bidder: H.S. Builders, Inc.
• Apparent Low Bid: $245,895.20
• Engineer's Estimate: $450,000.00
• Project Budget: This project is part of the overall Benson Hill Annexation budget.
• Funding Source: The Benson Hill Annexation budget (state reimbursement).
• Bid Irregularities: None
• Staff Recommendation: Award the contract for the Police Locker Rooms to the apparent low
bidder, H.S. Builders, Inc. via council concur.
Cc: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer
Mike Bailey, Finance/IS Administrator
Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
i
Bid Award,Locker Rooms doe
t
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: Police Locker Rooms; CAG-08-037 •
DATE: April 16, 2008
FORMS
Contractor's BID
BIDDER Bid Triple Qualification Addenda
Bond Form Statement 2
Apus Construction,Inc. X X X X $316,427.00
4 - 164th Ave.NE
Bellevue,WA 98008
Yury Palatnik
H.S. Builders, Inc. X X X X $245,895.20
1724 N. 120th St.
Seattle, WA 98133
Hin Singh
Lincoln Construction, Inc. X X X X $264,641.00
PO Box 730
Spanaway, WA 98387
Daniel C. Lincoln
Mike Werlech Construction, Inc. X X X X $263,341.00 •
PO Box 46579
Seattle, WA 98146
Mike Werlech
United Pacific Structures, Inc. X X X X $302,475.00
PO Box 1640
Gig Harbor,WA 98335
Jim Bozich
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $450,000.00
LEGEND: •
Forms:Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage
s
0.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL a!
AI ti: / s (4
• Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk April 21, 2008
Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing.. .
Bid opening on April 15, 2008, for CAG-08-033, Correspondence..
Ripley Lane N. Storm System Improvement Project Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Staff Recommendation Study Sessions
Bid Tabulation Sheet (seven bids) Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
Council concur Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
iliExpenditure Required... $1,475,874 Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget $1,729,507 City Share Total Project
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $1,565,069
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the
following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget,
and there were no significant irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low
bid submitted by Rodarte Construction, Inc. in the amount of$1,475,874. •
•
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid submitted by Rodarte Construction, Inc. in the amount of$1,475,874.
111
`SY O
• PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
-Nrv0 ME MOR ANDUM
DATE: April 16, 2008
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
FROM: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor(ext. 7248),X
STAFF
248) XSTAFF CONTACT: Steve Lee, Surface Water Utility Engineer(ext. 7205)
SUBJECT: Ripley Lane North Storm System Improvement Project Bid
Award: Construction Bid Award Recommendation, SWP-
27-3375, CAG-08-033
The bid opening for the Ripley Lane North Storm System Improvement project was held
on April 15, 2008, at 3:00 p.m. A total of seven(7) bids were submitted. The Engineer's
Estimate for the project is $1,565,069.
The low bid for the project is $1,475,874.00 from Rodarte Construction, Inc. The Surface
• Water Utility has reviewed all bids for completeness, inclusion of all required forms, bid
bond, and mathematical correctness. No mathematical errors were found in the low bid. All
other paper work for the low bidder was in order.
The following errors were noted from the submitted bidders:
1. Realm, Inc. bid included an irregularity because they did not include the
completed "Triple Form—Non Collusion Affidavit/Anti-Trust Claims/Minimum
Wage Affidavit" form when they submitted their bid. Due to this irregularity,
after consultation with the City Attorney, it was determined that the Realm, Inc.
bid had to be disqualified as being non-responsive in accordance with the
construction contract documents and specifications. In addition, the Realm, Inc
bid contained a mathematical error on bid item number 53 that has the written
word prevailing over the numerical number. Realm, Inc.'s bid of$1,391,702.30
(which is the true bid total after correcting for the mathematical error and their
total of$1,411,952.30).
2. Frank Coluccio Construction Company has a mathematical error on bid item
number 36 that results in their corrected bid total of$1,560,666.00 from the
original $1,560,566.00. This mathematical error does not result in changes in the
order of bidders.
3. Western Engineering Constructors, Inc. has a mathematical error on bid item 27
that results in their corrected bid totaling $1,585,317.00 from their original
$1,610,292.00. This error, that has the written word prevailing over the numerical
• number, does not change the order of their bid.
Walton/Ripley Lane N Storm System Imp Bid Award
April 16,2008
Page 2 of 2
•
The low bid of$1,475,874.00 is within the amount the approved Surface Water Utility
Capital Improvement Program budgeted for Ripley Lane North Storm System Improvement
project. The approved Surface Water Utility 2008 Capital Improvements Program (CIP)
budget total for the Ripley Lane North Storm System Improvement project is $1,729,507.
The budget total includes $607,707 of funding from the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT), as approved by City Council, in the State Participating
Agreement for the project on April 7, 2008. There is currently$1,692,558 of funds
remaining in the total project budget (#427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.000000/U65365).
There are sufficient funds in the approved Surface Water Utility 2008 CIP budget to fund
construction of the Ripley Lane North Storm System Improvement project.
The low bid meets the following conditions for award:
1. The low bid must be within the total project budget.
2. There must be more than one bidder.
3. The lowest responsive, responsible bid contains no significant irregularities.
Attached for your reference is a bid tabulation showing the Engineer's Estimate, low
bid amount, and the other six (6)bids submitted.
The Surface Water Utility recommends this item be placed on the April 21, 2008, consent •
agenda for Council concurrence. Staff further recommends that the Council award the
construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Rodarte Construction,
Inc. in the amount of$1,475,874.00.
With the exception of the low bidder's forms and schedule of prices, all bid packages will
be returned to the City Clerk's office.
Please contact Steve or me, if you have any questions.
Attachments
cc: Gregg Zimmerman,PW Administrator
Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director
•
H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects(CIP)\27-3375 Ripley Lane North-Gypsy Creek
Flooding Project\1600-Constr\Bid Award\08042 I council award.doc\SLtp
Project Title:Ripley Lane North(Gypsy Flooding)Project City of Renton
,r BID DATE: April 15,2008 Engrs Estimate
Item Unit Est. Unit Bid
No. Description Quantity Price Amount
1 Contractor Supplied Surveying Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00
2 SPCC Plan Lump Sum 1 2,000.00 2,000.00
' • 3 Property Restoration Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00
4 Utility Potholing Each 3 1,000.00 3,000.00
5 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 150,000.00 150,000.00
6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 15,000.00
7 Soil Sampling and Analysis Each 6 1,200.00 7,200.00
8 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 12,000.00 12,000.00
9 Sawcutting Linear Foot 45 12.00 540.00
10 Remove Asphalt Concrete/Cement Concrete Square Yard 75 22.00 1,650.00
11 Cold Mix Ton 60 100.00 6,000.00
12 Ripley Lane Roadway Detours Each 2 8,000.00 16,000.00
13 Channel Excavation Including Haul Cubic Yard 1,600 40.00 64,000.00
14 Gravel Borrow Including Haul • Ton 135 20.00 2,700.00
15 Stream Gravel Including Haul Ton 90 45.00 4,050.00
16 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl Haul Cubic Yard 50 50.00 2,500.00
17 Structure Excavation Class B Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 200 25.00 5,000.00
18 Contaminated Structure Excavation Class B Ton 500 200.00 100,000.00
19 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B Lump Sum 1 80,000.00 80,000.00
20 Controlled Density Fill Cubic Yard 15 125.00 1,875.00
21 Crushed Surfacing Ton 60 40.00 2,400.00
22 HMA CL 1"PG 64-22 Ton 35 120.00 4,200.00
23 HMA Class 1/2"PG 64-22 Ton 20 120.00 2,400.00
' 24 Outlet Structure Lump Sum 1 85,000.00 85,000.00
25 36 inch Diameter HDPE(DR21)Storm Drain Linear Foot 481 300.00 144,300.00
26 Abandon Existing 24-inch Storm Drain Pipe Linear Foot 53 60.00 3,180.00
27 Temporary Stormwater Diversion Lump Sum 1 12,000.00 12,000.00
28 Railroad Crossing Casing,48-inch DIA. Linear Foot 290 1,100.00 319,000.00
29 Testing Sewer Pipe Linear Foot 916 4.00 3,664.00
30 Manhole 48-inch DIA. Each 1 4,000.00 4,000.00
31 Drop Manhole Connection Each 1 7,000.00 7,000.00
32 Remove Existing Manhole Each 1 1,000.00 1,000.00
33 Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 1,400 20.00 28,000.00
34 Contaminated Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Ton 950 200.00 190,000.00
' • 35 Foundation Material Ton 500 45.00 22,500.00
36 Ductile Iron Pipe for Water Main,12-inch Dia Linear Foot 76 125.00 9,500.00
37 Blowoff Assembly Each 2 1,500.00 3,000.00
38 Gate Valve,12-inch Each 2 1,800.00 3,600.00
39 Comb.Air Release/Air Vacuum Valve Assen Each 1 2,500 00 2,500.00
40 Remove Existing Hydrant Each 1 1,000.00 1,000.00
41 Hydrant Assembly Each 1 4,000.00 4,000 00
42 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe,12-inch Dia. Linear Foot 145 100.00 14,500.00
43 Temporary Sanitary Sewer Diversion Lump Sum 1 1,000.00 1,000.00
44 Remove Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Pip Linear Foot 100 12.00 1,200.00
45 Abandon Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Linear Foot 45 5.00 225 00
' 46 Television Inspection Linear Foot 145 6.00 870.00
47 Temporary Relocate Existing 6-inch side sev Lump Sum 1 1,200 00 1,200.00
' 48 PVC Sanitary Side Sewer Pipe,6-inch Dia. Linear Foot 28 60.00 1,680 00
49 Erosion/Water Pollution Control Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00
50 Stabilized Construction Entrance Linear Foot 230 55 00 12,650.00
51 Seeding,Fertilizing and Mulching Square Yard 5,000 0.10 500.00
52 DeWatering Lump Sum 1 40,000.00 40,000.00
53 Beam Guardrail Type 1 Linear Foot 75 30.00 2,250.00
54 Beam Guardrail Anchor Type 1 Each 1 1,000.00 1,000.00
55 Chain Link Construction Fence Linear Foot 125 10.00 1,250.00
56 Chain Link Fence,Type 1 Linear Foot 75 30.00 2,250.00
57 Double 20 FT Chain-Link Gate Each 1 1,200.00 1,200.00
58 Light Loose Riprap Ton 160 45.00 7,200.00
59 Quarry Spalls Ton 320 45.00 14,400.00
60 PSIPE(Plant Set.Incl.Plant Estab) Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 15,000.00
61 Cement Concrete Driveway Square Yard 350 50.00 17,500.00
62 Paint Line Linear Foot 300 0.20 60.00
63 Gravity Block Wall Square Foot 225 15.00 3,375.00
64 Log Weirs Each 5 4,000.00 20,000.00
65 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00
al // Subtotal $1.565.069.00
+rpE�7/�^"' / Sales Tax Rule 171 Applies(0%) Tax $0.00
By: �i7
Steve Lee, Project Manager Total $1,565,069.00
BidTab-080415-FINAL-G ypsyRipleyV 2.XLS
Project Title:Ripley Lane North(Gypsy Flooding)Project Realm,Inc. Rodarte R.L.Alia.Co.
BID DATE: April 15,2008 (DISQUALIFIED) Construction,Inc.
Item Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid
No. Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount
1 Contractor Supplied Surveying Lump Sum 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
' 2 SPCC Plan Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 500.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
3 Property Restoration Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 2,000 00 2,000.00
4 Utility Potholing Each 3 1,000.00 3,000.00 650.00 1,950.00 200.00 600.00 0
5 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 385,000.00 385,000.00 113,000.00 113,000.00 125,000.00 125,000.00
6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 15,000.00 15,000 00
7 Soil Sampling and Analysis Each 6 4,000.00 24,000.00 450.00 2,700.00 1,000.00 6,000.00
8 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00
9 Sawcutting Linear Foot 45 7.00 315.00 9.00 405.00 5.00 225.00
10 Remove Asphalt Concrete/Cement Concrete Square Yard 75 9.00 675.00 15.00 1,125.00 2.00 150.00
11 Cold Mix Ton 60 95.00 5,700.00 100.00 6,000.00 30.00 1,800.00
12 Ripley Lane Roadway Detours Each 2 3,900.00 7,800.00 6,500.00 13,000.00 10,000.00 20,000.00
13 Channel Excavation Including Haul Cubic Yard 1,600 30.00 48,000.00 25.00 40,000.00 30.00 48,000.00
14 Gravel Borrow Including Haul Ton 135 30.00 4,050.00 20.00 2,700.00 30.00 4,050.00
15 Stream Gravel Including Haul Ton 90 .32.00 2,880.00 50.00 4,500.00 50.00 4,500.00
16 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl Haul Cubic Yard 50 28.00 1,400.00 45.00 2,250 00 25.00 1,250.00
17 Structure Excavation Class B Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 200 25.00 5,000.00 30.00 6,000.00 20.00 4,000.00
18 Contaminated Structure Excavation Class B Ton 500 25.00 12,500.00 80.00 40,000.00 25.00 12,500.00
19 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B Lump Sum 1 18,000.00 18,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00
20 Controlled Density Fill Cubic Yard 15 120.00 1,800.00 300.00 4,500.00 150.00 2,250.00
21 Crushed Surfacing Ton 60 35.00 2,100.00 30.00 1,800.00 30.00 1,800.00
22 HMA CL 1"PG 64-22 Ton 35 145.00 5,075.00 200.00 7,000.00 300.00 10,500.00
23 HMA Class 1/2"PG 64-22 Ton 20 165.00 3,300.00 200.00 4,000.00 300.00 6,000.00
24 Outlet Structure Lump Sum 1 145,000.00 145,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00
25 36 inch Diameter HDPE(DR21)Storm Drain Linear Foot 481 25.00 12,025.00 225.00 108,225 00 483.00 232,323.00
26 Abandon Existing 24-inch Storm Drain Pipe Linear Foot 53 20.00 1,060.00 18 00 954.00 10.00 530 00
27 Temporary Stormwater Diversion Lump Sum 1 25,000.00 25,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
28 Railroad Crossing Casing,in 48-inch DIA. Linear Foot 290 1,100.00 319,000.00 1,400.00 406,000.00 1,000.00 290,000.00
' 29 Testing Sewer Pipe Linear Foot 916 1.80 1,648.80 15.00 13,740.00 1.00 916.00
30 Manhole 48-inch DIA. Each 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 6,000.00 6,000.00
31 Drop Manhole Connection Each 1 2,800.00 2,800.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00
32 Remove Existing Manhole Each 1 1,100.00 1,100.00 225.00 225.00 100.00 100.00
33 Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 1,400 20.00 28,000.00 17.00 23,800 00 20.00 28,000 00
34 Contaminated Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Ton 950 20.00 19,000.00 75.00 71,250.00 25.00 23,750.00
III
35 Foundation Material Ton 500 23.00 11,500.00 35.00 17,500.00 50.00 25,000.00
36 Ductile Iron Pipe for Water Main.12-inch Dia Linear Foot 76 105.00 7,980.00 110.00 8,360.00 300 00 22,800.00
37 Blowoff Assembly Each 2 800.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 3,200.00 1,500.00 3,000.00
38 Gate Valve,12-inch Each 2 3,500.00 7,000.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 1,500.00 3,000 00
39 Comb.Air Release/Air Vacuum Valve Assen Each 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00
40 Remove Existing Hydrant Each 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 550 00 550.00 100.00 100.00
41 Hydrant Assembly Each 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00
42 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe,12-inch Dia. Linear Foot 145 39.00 5,655.00 80.00 11,600.00 200.00 29,000.00
43 Temporary Sanitary Sewer Diversion Lump Sum 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
44 Remove Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Pip Linear Foot 100 35.00 3,500.00 12.00 1,200.00 10.00 1,000.00
45 Abandon Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Linear Foot 45 50.00 2,250.00 14.00 630.00 10.00 450.00
46 Television Inspection Linear Foot 145 10.00 1,450.00 3.00 435.00 2.00 290.00
47 Temporary Relocate Existing 6-inch side see Lump Sum 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00
48 PVC Sanitary Side Sewer Pipe,6-inch Dia. Linear Foot 28 72.00 2,016.00 50.00 1,400.00 100.00 2,800.00
49 Erosion/Water Pollution Control Lump Sum 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
50 Stabilized Construction Entrance Linear Foot 230 35.00 8,050.00 45.00 10,350.00 30.00 6,900 00
51 Seeding,Fertilizing and Mulching Square Yard 5,000 1.00 5,000.00 0.50 2,500.00 0.50 2,500.00
52 DeWatering Lump Sum 1 30,000.00 30,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 90,000.00 90,000.00
53 Beam Guardrail Type 1 Linear Foot 75 30.00 2,250.00 100.00 7,500.00 100.00 7,500.00
54 Beam Guardrail Anchor Type 1 Each 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 2,500 00
55 Chain Link Construction Fence Linear Foot 125 2.50 312.50 2.00 250.00 3.00 375.00
56 Chain Link Fence,Type 1 Linear Foot 75 33.00 2,475.00 32.00 2,400.00 30.00 2,250.00
57 Double 20 FT Chain-Link Gate Each 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
58 Light Loose Riprap Ton 160 36.00 5,760.00 60.00 9,600.00 50 00 8,000.00
59 Quarry Spalls Ton 320 68.00 21,760.00 40.00 12,800 00 50.00 16,000.00
60 PSIPE(Plant Sel.Incl.Plant Estab) Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 9,000 00 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00
61 Cement Concrete Driveway Square Yard 350 45.00 15,750.00 22.00 7,700.00 60.00 21,000.00
62 Paint Line Linear Foot 300 0.55 165.00 0.25 75.00 3.00 900.00
63 Gravity Block Wall Square Foot 225 20.00 4,500.00 20.00 4,500.00 10.00 2,250 00
64 Log Weirs Each 5 4,000.00 20,000.00 6,500.00 32,500.00 2,000.00 10,000.00
65 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 •
Subtotal $1,391,702.30 Subtotal $1,475,874.00 Subtotal $1,490,859.00
Sales Tax Rule 171 Applies(0%) Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00
By:
Steve Lee, Project Manager I Total $1,391,702.30 Total $1,475,874.00 Total $1,490,859.00
BidTab-080415-FINAL-Gypsy Ri pleyV 2.XLS
re
Project Title:Ripley Lane North(Gypsy Flooding)Project Frank Coluccio Western Engr. Ceccanti,Inc.
, BID DATE: April 15,2008 Construction Co. Contractors,Inc.
Item Unit Est Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid
No. Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount I
1 Contractor Supplied Surveying Lump Sum 1 12,000.00 12,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 20,000 00 20,000.00
fa
2 SPCC Plan Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
3 Property Restoration Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00
4 Utility Potholing Each 3 1,000.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 600.00 1,800.00
5 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 200,000.00 200,000.00 140,000.00 140,000.00 164,000.00 164,000.00
6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 40,000.00 40,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 40,000.00 40,000.00
7 Soil Sampling and Analysis Each 6 800.00 4,800.00 500.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 6,000.00
8 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00
9 Sawcutting Linear Foot 45 8.00 360.00 5.00 225.00 10.00 450.00
10 Remove Asphalt Concrete/Cement Concrete Square Yard 75 15.00 1,125.00 25.00 1,875.00 6.00 450.00
11 Cold Mix Ton 60 75.00 4,500.00 150.00 9,000.00 80.00 4,800.00
12 Ripley Lane Roadway Detours Each 2 10,000.00 20,000.00 10,000.00 20,000 00 7,500.00 15,000.00
13 Channel Excavation Including Haul Cubic Yard 1,600 38.00 60,800.00 30.00 48,000.00 40.00 64,000.00
' 14 Gravel Borrow Including Haul Ton 135 25.00 3,375.00 30.00 4,050.00 20.00 2,700.00
I 15 Stream Gravel Including Haul Ton 90 35.00 3,150.00 45.00 4,050.00 66.00 5,940.00
16 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl Haul Cubic Yard 50 40.00 2,000.00 40.00 2,000.00 20.00 1,000.00
17 Structure Excavation Class B Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 200 35.00 7,000.00 30.00 6,000.00 40.00 8,000.00
18 Contaminated Structure Excavation Class B Ton 500 80.00 40,000.00 60.00 30,000.00 50.00 25,000.00
19 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B Lump Sum 1 50,000.00 50,000.00 320,000.00 320,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00
20 Controlled Density Fill Cubic Yard 15 90.00 1,350.00 150.00 2,250.00 100.00 1,500.00
21 Crushed Surfacing Ton 60 20 00 1,200.00 32.00 1,920.00 40.00 2,400.00
22 HMA CL 1"PG 64-22 Ton 35 125.00 4,375.00 176.00 6,160.00 120.00 4,200.00
23 HMA Class 1/2"PG 64-22 Ton 20 135.00 2,700.00 200.00 4,000.00 120 00 2,400.00
24 Outlet Structure Lump Sum 1 175,000.00 175,000.00 175,000.00 175,000.00 198,000.00 198,000 00
25 36 inch Diameter HDPE(DR21)Storm Drain Linear Foot 481 300.00 144,300.00 270.00 129,870.00 350.00 168,350.00
26 Abandon Existing 24-inch Storm Drain Pipe Linear Foot 53 20.00 1,060.00 22.00 1,166.00 30.00 1,590.00
27 Temporary Stormwater Diversion Lump Sum 1 25,000.00 25,000.00 25.00 25.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
28 Railroad Crossing Casing,48-inch DIA. Linear Foot 290 1,300.00 377,000.00 1,000.00 290,000.00 1,000.00 290,000.00
29 Testing Sewer Pipe Linear Foot 916 1.00 916.00 5.00 4,580.00 3.50 3,206.00
30 Manhole 48-inch DIA. Each 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
31 Drop Manhole Connection Each 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 4,400.00 4,400.00
32 Remove Existing Manhole Each 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 250.00 250.00
33 Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 1,400 25.00 35,000.00 30.00 42,000.00 40.00 56,000.00
34 Contaminated Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Ton 950 70.00 66,500.00 60.00 57,000.00 50.00 47,500.00
0 35 Foundation Material Ton 500 25.00 12,500.00 32.00 16,000.00 20.00 10,000.00
36 Ductile Iron Pipe for Water Main,12-inch Dia Linear Foot 76 100.00 7,600.00 210.00 15,960.00 350.00 26,600.00
37 Blowoff Assembly Each 2 1,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,000.00 1,800.00 3,600.00
38 Gate Valve,12-inch Each 2 500.00 1,000.00 2,500.00 5,000.00 2,300.00 4,600.00
39 Comb.Air Release/Air Vacuum Valve Assen Each 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 3,500.00
40 Remove Existing Hydrant Each 1 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
41 Hydrant Assembly Each 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
42 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe,12-inch Dia. Linear Foot 145 100.00 14,500.00 28.00 4,060.00 100.00 14,500.00
43 Temporary Sanitary Sewer Diversion Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
44 Remove Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Pip Linear Foot 100 10.00 1,000.00 25.00 2,500.00 8.00 800.00
45 Abandon Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Linear Foot 45 10.00 450.00 40.00 1,800.00 30.00 1,350.00
46 Television Inspection Linear Foot 145 5.00 725.00 10.00 1,450.00 6.00 870.00
47 Temporary Relocate Existing 6-inch side sev Lump Sum 1 500.00 500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,200.00 1,200.00
48 PVC Sanitary Side Sewer Pipe,6-inch Dia Linear Foot 28 65.00 1,820.00 62.00 1,736.00 100.00 2,800.00
49 Erosion/Water Pollution Control Lump Sum 1 10,000.00 10,000 00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
50 Stabilized Construction Entrance Linear Foot 230 10.00 2,300.00 30.00 6,900.00 50 00 11,500.00
51 Seeding,Fertilizing and Mulching Square Yard 5,000 1.00 5,000.00 0.45 2,250.00 0.20 1,000.00
52 DeWatering Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 19,000.00 19,000.00
53 Beam Guardrail Type 1 Linear Foot 75 45.00 3,375.00 100.00 7,500.00 40.00 3,000.00
54 Beam Guardrail Anchor Type 1 Each 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 800.00 800.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
55 Chain Link Construction Fence Linear Foot 125 3 00 375.00 10.00 1,250.00 7.00 875.00
56 Chain Link Fence,Type 1 Linear Foot 75 35.00 2,625.00 50.00 3,750.00 30.00 2,250.00
57 Double 20 FT Chain-Link Gate Each 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
58 Light Loose Riprap Ton 160 35.00 5,600.00 35.00 5,600.00 70.00 11,200.00
59 Quarry Spalls Ton 320 33.00 10,560.00 32.00 10,240.00 35.00 11,200.00
60 PSIPE(Plant Sel.Incl.Plant Estab) Lump Sum 1 25,000.00 25,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00
61 Cement Concrete Driveway Square Yard 350 60.00 21,000.00 54.00 18,900.00 18.00 6,300.00
62 Paint Line Linear Foot 300 2.00 600.00 3.00 900.00 3.00 900.00 I
63 Gravity Block Wall Square Foot 225 25.00 5,625.00 18.00 4,050.00 30.00 6,750 00
64 Log Weirs Each 5 1,500.00 7,500.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 1,000.00 5,000.00
65 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00
III2.„.„. .._.-- I Subtotal $1,560,666.00 Subtotal $1,585.317.00 Subtotal $1.642,231.00
Sales Tax Rule 171 Applies(0%) Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00
By:
St ve Lee, Project Manager I Total $1,560,666.00 Total $1,585,317 00 Total $1,642,231.00
BidTab-080415-FINAL-GypsyR ipl eyV 2.XLS
Project Title:Ripley Lane North(Gypsy Flooding)Project Construct Co.
BID DATE: April 15,2008 Company
Item Unit Est. Unit Bid
No. Descnption Quantity Price Amount
1 Contractor Supplied Surveying Lump Sum 1 12,980.00 12,980.00
2 SPCC Plan Lump Sum 1 6,945.00 6,945.00
3 Property Restoration Lump Sum 1 25,100.00 25,100.00
•
I 4 Utility Potholing Each 3 382.00 1,146.00
5 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 170,000.00 170,000.00
6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 77,630.00 77,630.00
7 Soil Sampling and Analysis Each 6 288.00 1,728 00
8 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 27,655.00 27,655.00
9 Sawcutting Linear Foot 45 2.25 101.25
10 Remove Asphalt Concrete/Cement Concrete Square Yard 75 6.75 506.25
11 Cold Mix Ton 60 147.00 8,820.00
12 Ripley Lane Roadway Detours Each 2 45,280.00 90,560.00
13 Channel Excavation Including Haul Cubic Yard 1,600 22.25 35,600.00
14 Gravel Borrow Including Haul Ton 135 25.00 3,375.00
15 Stream Gravel Including Haul Ton 90 26.00 2,340.00
16 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl Haul Cubic Yard 50 24.00 1,200.00
17 Structure Excavation Class B Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 200 26.00 5,200.00
18 Contaminated Structure Excavation Class B Ton 500 69.00 34,500.00
19 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B Lump Sum 1 6,185.00 6,185.00
20 Controlled Density Fill Cubic Yard 15 95.00 1,425.00
21 Crushed Surfacing Ton 60 27.00 1,620.00
22 HMA CL 1"PG 64-22 Ton 35 250.00 8,750.00
23 HMA Class 1/2"PG 64-22 Ton 20 288.00 5,760.00
III 24 Outlet Structure Lump Sum 1 272,000.00 272,000.00
25 36 inch Diameter HDPE(DR21)Storm Drain Linear Foot 481 168.00 80,808.00
26 Abandon Existing 24-inch Storm Drain Pipe Linear Foot 53 11.00 583.00
27 Temporary Stormwater Diversion Lump Sum 1 46,540.00 46,540.00
28 Railroad Crossing Casing,48-inch DIA. Linear Foot 290 1,340.00 388,600.00
29 Testing Sewer Pipe Linear Foot 916 23.00 21,068.00
30 Manhole 48-inch DIA. Each 1 2,265.00 2,265 00
31 Drop Manhole Connection Each 1 6,280.00 6,280.00
32 Remove Existing Manhole Each 1 755.00 755 00
33 Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 1,400 24.00 33,600.00
34 Contaminated Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Ton 950 81.00 76,950.00
35 Foundation Material Ton 500 27.00 13,500.00
III
36 Ductile Iron Pipe for Water Main,12-inch Dia Linear Foot 76 139.00 10,564.00
37 Blowoff Assembly Each 2 2,692.00 5,384.00
38 Gate Valve,12-inch Each 2 2,490.00 4,980.00
39 Comb.Air Release/Air Vacuum Valve Assen Each 1 4,224.00 4,224.00
40 Remove Existing Hydrant Each 1 661.00 661.00
41 Hydrant Assembly Each 1 3,620.00 3,620.00
42 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe,12-inch Dia. Linear Foot 145 48.00 6,960.00
43 Temporary Sanitary Sewer Diversion Lump Sum 1 6,095 00 6,095.00
44 Remove Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Pip Linear Foot 100 11.00 1,100.00
45 Abandon Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Linear Foot 45 11.00 495.00
46 Television Inspection Linear Foot 145 4.00 580.00
47 Temporary Relocate Existing 6-inch side sev Lump Sum 1 2,155.00 2,155.00
48 PVC Sanitary Side Sewer Pipe,6-inch Dia. Linear Foot 28 105.00 2,940.00
49 Erosion/Water Pollution Control Lump Sum 1 37,120.00 37,120.00
50 Stabilized Construction Entrance Linear Foot 230 9.00 2,070.00
51 Seeding,Fertilizing and Mulching Square Yard 5,000 0.50 2,500.00
52 DeWatering Lump Sum 1 40,000 00 40,000.00
53 Beam Guardrail Type 1 Linear Foot 75 107.00 8,025.00
54 Beam Guardrail Anchor Type 1 Each 1 980.00 980.00
55 Chain Link Construction Fence Linear Foot 125 2.25 281 25
56 Chain Link Fence,Type 1 Linear Foot 75 39.50 2,962.50
57 Double 20 FT Chain-Link Gate Each 1 2,065.00 2,065.00
58 Light Loose Riprap Ton 160 44.00 7,040.00
59 Quarry Spalls Ton 320 32.00 10,240.00
60 PSIPE(Plant Sel.Incl.Plant Estab) Lump Sum 1 14,675 00 14,675.00
61 Cement Concrete Driveway Square Yard 350 59.00 20,650.00
62 Paint Line Linear Foot 300 5.50 1,650.00
63 Gravity Block Wall Square Foot 225 37.00 8,325.00
64 Log Weirs Each 5 1,550.00 7,750.00
65 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00
/ f d Subtotal $1,708,167.25
ID
Sales Tax Rule 171 Applies(0%)i Tax $0.00
BY
eve Lee, Project Manager Total $1,708,167.25
BidTab-080415-FINAL-GypsyR ipteyV 2.XLS
Project Title:Ripley Lane North(Gypsy Flooding)Project STATISTICAL SUMMARY
BID DATE: April 15,2008 Engineers Low Average Average Median
Estimate Bidder Three All Bids All Bids
Item Unit Est. Lowest Bids
No. Description Quantity Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price
1 Contractor Supplied Surveying Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 10,000.00 9,333.33 10,000 00 10,000.00
2 SPCC Plan Lump Sum 1 2,000.00 5,000.00 2,166.67 2,875.00 3,000.00
ill
3 Property Restoration Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 5,000.00 5,666.67 8,000.00 7,500.00
4 Utility Potholing Each 3 1,000.00 1,000.00 616.67 712.50 825.00
5 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 150,000.00 385,000.00 207,666.67 205,750.00 162,500.00
6 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 5,000.00 23,333.33 27,500.00 27,500.00
7 Soil Sampling and Analysis Each 6 1,200.00 4,000.00 1,816.67 1,562.50 900.00
8 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 12,000.00 3,000.00 24,333.33 30,750.00 30,000.00
9 Sawcutting Linear Foot 45 12.00 7.00 7.00 7.25 7.50
10 Remove Asphalt Concrete/Cement Concrete Square Yard 75 22.00 9.00 8.67 10.25 12.00
11 Cold Mix Ton 60 100 00 95.00 75.00 75.00 85.00
12 Ripley Lane Roadway Detours Each 2 8,000.00 3,900.00 6,800.00 7,600.00 8,250.00
13 Channel Excavation Including Haul Cubic Yard 1,600 40.00 30.00 28.33 30.75 30.00
14 Gravel Borrow Including Haul Ton 135 20.00 30.00 26.67 26.25 27.50
15 Stream Gravel Including Haul Ton 90 45.00 32.00 44.00 41.75 42.50
16 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl Haul Cubic Yard 50 50.00 28.00 32.67 34.50 34.00
17 Structure Excavation Class B Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 200 25.00 25.00 25.00 27.50 27.50
18 Contaminated Structure Excavation Class B Ton 500 200.00 25.00 43.33 52.50 52.50
19 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B Lump Sum 1 80,000.00 18,000.00 24,333.33 30,750.00 34,000.00
20 Controlled Density Fill Cubic Yard 15 125.00 120.00 190.00 165.00 135.00
21 Crushed Surfacing Ton 60 40.00 35.00 31.67 28.75 30.00
22 HMA CL 1"PG 64-22 Ton 35 120.00 145.00 215.00 192.50 172.50
23 HMA Class 1/2"PG 64-22 Ton 20 120.00 165.00 221.67 200.00 182.50
24 Outlet Structure Lump Sum 1 85,000.00 145,000.00 198,333.33 192,500.00 187,500.00
25 36 inch Diameter HDPE(DR21)Storm Drain Linear Foot 481 300.00 25.00 244.33 258.25 262.50
26 Abandon Existing 24-inch Storm Drain Pipe Linear Foot 53 60.00 20.00 16.00 17.00 19.00
27 Temporary Stormwater Diversion Lump Sum 1 12,000.00 25,000.00 15,000.00 17,500.00 17,500.00
28 Railroad Crossing Casing,48-inch DIA. Linear Foot 290 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,166.67 1,200.00 1,200.00
29 Testing Sewer Pipe Linear Foot 916 4.00 1.80 5.93 4.70 1.40
30 Manhole 48-inch DIA. Each 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,500.00 4,125.00 3,750.00
31 Drop Manhole Connection Each 1 7,000.00 2,800.00 2,433.33 2,075.00 2,150.00
32 Remove Existing Manhole Each 1 1,000.00 1,100.00 475.00 856.25 662.50
33 Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Cubic Yard 1,400 20.00 20.00 19.00 20.50 20.00
34 Contaminated Trench Excavation Incl.Haul Ton 950 200.00 20.00 40.00 47.50 47.50
• 35 Foundation Material Ton 500 45.00 23.00 36.00 33.25 30.00
36 Ductile Iron Pipe for Water Main,12-inch Dia Linear Foot 76 125.00 105.00 171.67 153.75 107.50
37 Blowoff Assembly Each 2 1,500.00 800.00 1,300.00 1,225.00 1,250.00
38 Gate Valve,12-inch Each 2 1,800.00 3,500.00 2,666.67 2,125.00 2,250.00
39 Comb.Air Release/Air Vacuum Valve Assen Each 1 2,500.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 3,750.00 3,750.00
40 Remove Existing Hydrant Each 1 1,000.00 3,000.00 1,216.67 1,037.50 525.00
41 Hydrant Assembly Each 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,833.33 3,500.00 3,500.00
42 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe,12-inch Dia. Linear Foot 145 100.00 39.00 106.33 104.75 90.00
43 Temporary Sanitary Sewer Diversion Lump Sum 1 1,000.00 50,000.00 20,000.00 16,250.00 5,000.00
44 Remove Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Pip Linear Foot 100 12.00 35.00 19.00 16.75 11.00
45 Abandon Existing 12-inch Sanitary Sewer Linear Foot 45 5.00 50.00 24.67 21.00 12.00
46 Television Inspection Linear Foot 145 6.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 4.00
47 Temporary Relocate Existing 6-inch side sev Lump Sum 1 1,200.00 4,000.00 3,666.67 2,875.00 2,500.00
48 PVC Sanitary Side Sewer Pipe,6-inch Dia. Linear Foot 28 60.00 72.00 74.00 71.75 68.50
49 Erosion/Water Pollution Control Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
50 Stabilized Construction Entrance Linear Foot 230 55.00 35.00 36.67 30.00 32.50
51 Seeding,Fertilizing and Mulching Square Yard 5,000 0.10 1.00 0.67 0.75 0.75
52 DeWatering Lump Sum 1 40,000.00 30,000.00 56,666.67 47,500.00 40,000.00
53 Beam Guardrail Type 1 Linear Foot 75 30.00 30.00 76.67 68.75 72.50
54 Beam Guardrail Anchor Type 1 Each 1 1,000.00 5,000.00 2,833.33 2,750 00 2,500.00
55 Chain Link Construction Fence Linear Foot 125 10.00 2.50 2.50 2.63 2.75
56 Chain Link Fence,Type 1 Linear Foot 75 30.00 33.00 31.67 32.50 32.50
57 Double 20 FT Chain-Link Gate Each 1 1,200.00 1,500.00 1,233.33 1,300.00 1,350.00
58 Light Loose Riprap Ton 160 45.00 36.00 48.67 45.25 43.00
59 Quarry Spalls Ton 320 45.00 68.00 52.67 47.75 45.00
60 PSIPE(Plant Sel.Incl.Plant Estab) Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 11,000.00 14,500.00 12,000.00
61 Cement Concrete Driveway Square Yard 350 50.00 45.00 42.33 46.75 52.50
62 Paint Line Linear Foot 300 0.20 0.55 1.27 1.45 1.28
63 Gravity Block Wall Square Foot 225 15.00 20.00 16.67 18.75 20.00
64 Log Weirs Each 5 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,166.67 3,500.00 3,000.00
65 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00
• (Averages below from Bid Subtotals,NOT calculated from unit prices above)
$1,565,069.00 $1,391,702.30 $1,452,811.77 $1,479,775.33 $1,483,366.50i.
`� Sales Tax Rule 171 Applies(0%) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00,
By:
Leve Lee, Project Manager I $1,565,069.00 $1,391,702.30 $1,452,811.77 $1,479,775.33 $1,483,366.50;
BidTab-080415-FINAL-GypsyRipleyV2.XLS
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: Ripley Lane N. Storm System Improvement; CAG-08-033 •
DATE: April 15, 2008
FORMS
BIDDER Bid Triple Addenda BID
Bond Form 2
Ceccanti X X X $1,642,231.00
4116 Brookdale Rd. E.
Tacoma,WA 98446
Donna Motland
Construct Co. X X X $1,708,167.25
1621 Pease Ave.
Sumner, WA 98390
Cy Morse
Frank Coluccio Construction Company X X X $1,560,566.00
9600 Martin Luther King Jr. Way S. $1,560,666.00
Seattle, WA 98118
Joseph J. Coluccio
R.L. Alia Company X X X $1,490,859.00
107 Williams Ave. S. •
Renton, WA 98057
Richard L. Alia
Realm, Inc. X X $1,111,952.30
PO Box 580 $1,391,702.30
Dupont, WA 98327
Dave Follett
Rodarte Construction, Inc. X X X $1,475,874.00
PO Box 1875
Auburn, WA 98071-1875
Frank C. Rodarte, Sr.
Western Engineering Constructors, Inc. X X X $1,610,292.00
8060 Ridge Dr. NE $1,585,317.00
Seattle, WA 98115
Michael J. Wieck
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $1,565,069.00 *corrected •
LEGEND:
Forms:Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#:
• Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. Finance & IS Department April 21, 2008
Staff Contact Michael E. Bailey Agenda Status
Finance/IS Administrator Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
2008 Budget Amendment for Information Technology Ordinance X
Projects Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Ordinance Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept X
Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept X
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $486,000 Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
III
The proposed Ordinance increases the 2008 Budget in the amount of$486,000 by carrying
forward funds from 2007 for information technology projects that were not completed in 2007,
but are anticipated to be completed in 2008.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the 2008 Budget Amendment in the amount of$486,000, and adopt the ordinance.
•
C:\DOCUME—I\BWalton\LOCALS--1\Temp\2008 Budget Amendment IT projects a.doc
ti`SYO� FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES
S ;- ® , DEPARTMENT
y
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 15, 2008
TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: - Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: Mike Bailey, Administrator
SUBJECT: 2008 Budget Amendment Carry-forward for Information
Technology Projects
ISSUE
• Should ordinance 5325 adopting the 2008 budget be amended to authorize expenditures
for information technology projects started but not completed in 2007?
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt an ordinance amending the 2008 Budget to authorize the carry-forward of
information technology projects and corresponding appropriations.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
Earlier this year, council approved an ordinance authorizing the completion of unfinished
2007 projects in 2008. At that time, information technology projects were still being
reviewed and were not included in that original amendment. This action would authorize
the completion of the four information technology projects in progress at the end of 2007.
A list of the projects, the amounts, and a brief explanation follows:
Maintenance Task Management: - $273,000 is requested.
This multi-year project began at year-end 2007 and will be completed mid-2009.
Unspent 2007 funds of$273,000 and the $450,000 budgeted in year 2008 leave a total
project amount remaining of$823,000 to be spent in 2008 and 2009.
i
h:\finance\adminsup\02_issuepapers_memos to council or mayor\2008 budget it carryforward amendment issue
paper.doc
k
Marcie Palmer, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
April 15,2008
Page 2 of 2
•
New World Systems:- $136,000 is requested.
This multi-year project is scheduled to be completed in 2008. The remaining balance
will pay for previously obligated vendor consulting services, custom interfaces, and
product enhancements.
Web Site Refresh: - $50,000 is requested.
This project is mostly completed. The remaining funds will be used to complete the
streaming video and storage component of the project that was postponed until 2008 due
to workload issues.
Video/Remote Training: $27,000 is requested.
This project was postponed from 2007 to 2008 to accommodate the staff and
restructuring changes in the Fire and Emergency Services Department. This request,
approved as a component of the 2007 budget, adds to the 2008 budget amount of
$100,000 for a total project budget of$127,000.
The total spending request is $486,000.
CONCLUSION
The 2008 budget amendments proposed will allow us to continue work on these projects.
Attachment: Draft Budget Amendment Ordinance. •
cc: Jay Covington,CAO
Marty Wine,Assistant CAO
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
George McBride
•
h:\finance\adminsup\02_issuepapers_memos to council or mayor\2008 budget it carryforward amendment issue
paper.doc
J
•
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE CITY OF RENTON FISCAL YEAR 2008 ANNUAL
BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 5325.
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5325
approving the City of Renton's 2008 Annual Budget; and
WHEREAS, funds appropriated in 2007, but not expended in 2007 need to be carried
forward and appropriated for expenditure in 2008;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
• WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Ordinance No. 5325 as previously amended establishing the City
of Renton's 2008 Annual Budget is hereby further amended in the total amount of$486,000 as
follows:
1. The Information Services Fund(Fund 503) is hereby amended to reflect the following
appropriations:
•
1
4'
ORDINANCE NO.
INFORMATION SERVICES FUND(Fund 503)
•
FY 2008
2008 Carry-
2008 Original forward Amended 2008
REVENUES Budget Amendment Budget
Funding Source
Use prior year revenues 653,570 486,000 1,139,570
New Revenues 4,904,138 0 4,904,138
Revenues 5,557,708 486,000 6,043,708
EXPENDITURES 5,557,708 5,557,708
Maintenance Task Management 273,000 273,000
New World Systems 136,000 136,000
Web Site Refresh 50,000 50,000
Video/Remote Training 27,000 27,000
Expenditures 5,557,708 486,000 6,043,708
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five (5) days after publication.
•
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008.
II
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney •
2
f
ORDINANCE NO.
Date of Publication:
•
•
•
3
• CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al#: •a
•Submitting Data: For Agenda of: April 21, 2008
Dept/Div/Board.. Police
Staff Contact Chief Milosevich Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Request to start specific Lateral Police Officers at "D" Correspondence..
Step Police Officer Wage - Range PC60 Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Issue paper Study Sessions
Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur Legal Dept
Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $14,800 Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted $14,800 Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
•
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Approve and authorize wages at City of Renton Salary Range PC60 "D" Step for:
Lateral Police Officer Shelly Hamel, retroactive to January 1, 2008
Gary Berntson, retroactive to April 1, 2008
Christopher Reyes, retroactive to April 16, 2008
Ron Cunningham, retroactive to April 16, 2008
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Increase the beginning salaries of Lateral Police Officers Shelly Hamel, Gary Berntson,
Christopher Reyes, and Ron Cunningham to City of Renton Salary Range PC60 "D" step.
•
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
4.
ti`SY O�111
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 10, 2008
TO: Marci Palmer, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: - Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: 3;41
plo Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Request to start Lateral Police Officers Shelly Hamel, Gary
Berntson, Christopher Reyes, and Ron Cunningham's
compensation at "D" Step Police Officer wage
ISSUE:
Should the City Council authorize the starting compensation for Lateral Police Officers
Shelly Hamel, Gary Berntson, Christopher Reyes, and Ron Cunningham at "D" Step
Police Officer's wage?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve and authorize "D" Step Police Officer wage for Lateral Police Officers Shelly
Hamel (retroactive to 1/1/08), Gary Berntson (effective 4/1/08), Christopher Reyes
(effective 4/16/08), and Ron Cunningham (effective 4/16/08).
BACKGROUND:
The City of Renton has just completed a large annexation, requiring the Police
Department to hire 24 additional officers. The Police Department has attracted many
well qualified and experienced officers from outside agencies. On occasion, lateral
officer candidates possess a lengthy tenure with their department and have a higher than
average amount of experience to contribute to the department. The Chief of Police is
authorized to offer new employees a salary of up to "C" step without council approval.
Entry level officers with the Renton Police Department reach "D" step with 3 years of
service.
Lateral Officer Shelly Hamel began employment with the Renton Police Department on
January 1, 2008. Officer Hamel's previous position was as a sergeant with the Evergreen
College Police. Prior to working at Evergreen College, Officer Hamel was a police
officer with the Federal Way Police Department for ten years. During this time, Officer
Hamel worked a variety of specialty assignments, which included three-and-a-half years
Page 2 of 2
as an instructor with the Criminal Justice Training Center. She was a police officer with •
the Ferndale Police Department for six years prior to working at Federal Way Police
Department. Officer Hamel brings almost 17 years police experience and numerous state
certifications to the Renton Police Department. Her experience and qualifications merit a
higher beginning salary than "C" step. The additional cost to the city will be
approximately $400 a month, retroactive to January 1, 2008, would be $4,800. This will
not require additional funding.
Lateral Police Officer Gary Berntson has completed all phases of testing and has been
offered employment with the Renton Police Department. Mr. Berntson is a ten year
veteran of the Seattle Police Department, with experience in a variety of assignments
including the anti-crime team. Mr. Berntson is currently earning$5,587 per month.
Bringing Mr. Bernston in at "C" step ($5,572 including patrol premium and education),
would be a decrease in compensation. Mr. Berentson's experience and qualifications
merit a higher beginning salary than"C" step. Mr. Berentson's compensation at"D" step
would be approximately$5,972. With a difference of$400 a month, beginning in April,
the additional cost to the city will be $3,600 and will not require additional funding.
Lateral Police Officer Christopher Reyes has completed all phases of testing and has been
offered employment with the Renton Police Department. Mr. Reyes is a nine year veteran
of the Seattle Police Department, with experience in a variety of assignments including a
supervisory role for the anti-crime team. Mr. Reyes is currently earning $5,587 per
month. Hiring Mr. Reyes at "C" step ($5,572 including patrol premium and education), •
would be a decrease in compensation. Mr. Reyes' experience and qualifications merit a
higher salary than "C" step. Mr. Reyes' compensation at"D" step would be
approximately $5,972. With a difference of$400 a month, beginning in mid-April, the
additional cost to the city will be $3,200 and will not require additional funding.
Lateral Police Officer Ron Cunningham has completed all phases of testing and has been
offered employment with the Renton Police Department. Mr. Cunningham is an eight
year veteran of the Seattle Police Department. Mr. Cunningham is currently earning
$5,587 per month. Bringing Mr. Cunningham in at "C" step ($5,572 including patrol
premium and education), would be a decrease in compensation. Mr. Cunningham's
experience and qualifications merit a higher salary than"C" step.
Mr. Cunningham's compensation at "D" step would be approximately $5,972. With a
difference of$400 a month, beginning in mid-April, the additional cost to the city will be
$3,200 and will not require additional funding.
•
h:\pd_admin\ga\agendabills-issue papers\2008-issuepaper-salaries.doc
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: / idj- ' l
fej
• Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. PW Dept/Transportation Syst Div April 21, 2008
Staff Contact Dan Hasty, Transportation Agenda Status
Planning, x7246 Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
City of Renton Trails and Bikeways Study and Map Correspondence..
Supplemental Agreement#2 with MacLeod Reckord Ordinance
(CAG-07-033) Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business X
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Supplemental Agreement #2 Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
Council Concur Finance Dept X
Fiscal Impact: (funds 317.012173 and 316.000000)
Expenditure Required... $16,719.30 Transfer/Amendment..
Amount Budgeted 194,378.00 (2007-08) STEP Grant $100,000.00
Total Project Budget.... $194,378.00 City Share Total Project $ 94,378.00
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
• The City is the hub of three major trails (Cedar River Trail, Lake Washington Loop Trail, and the
Interurban Trail). However, access to each of these trails and access between them, needs improvement.
In addition, the important smaller connections between neighborhoods, schools, park facilities, and
commercial and employment areas need identification and development.
The City received a FFY 2004-2006 Statewide Transportation Enhancements Program grant in the
amount of$100,000. The Transportation Systems Division budgeted $52,719 and the Parks Division
budgeted $41,659 in matching dollars to fund this project. The goals are to identify and enhance
facilities that support and encourage recreational bicycling, walking, skating, hiking, and water trails to
promote and encourage bicycle, pedestrian, or multi-modal commuting.
Supplemental Agreement # 2 with MacLeod Reckord is needed to authorize adding$16,719.30 to the
previously authorized amount to have the consultant provide individual project sheets for approximately
50 non-motorized routes within the planning document and for additional work to identify preferred
routes for the existing facilities map, extending the term of the contract to December 31, 2008.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Supplemental Agreement#2 with MacLeod Reckord in the
amount of$16,719.30 for a Trails and Bikeways Study and map, and extend the term to December 31,
2008.
C:\DOCUM E-1\B W alton\LOCALS-1\Temp\AgnbilIBikeMapSupplement2.doc
•
ti`SY O PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
,
MEMORANDUMg,
•
DATE: April 21, 2007
TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: it/D,. Denis Law, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman ' fdministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Dan Hasty, Transportation Planning, x7246
Leslie Betlach, Parks Division, x6619
SUBJECT: City of Renton Trails and Bikeways Study and Map
Supplemental Agreement#2 with MacLeod Reckord
ISSUE:
Should Council approve Supplemental Agreement#2 with MacLeod Reckord in the amount of
• $16,719.30 and increase the total amount payable to $174,850.50?
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Supplemental Agreement#2 with MacLeod Reckord
in the amount of$16,719.30 for a Trails and Bikeways Study and map.
BACKGROUND:
Historically, the City of Renton Parks and Transportation Systems divisions each developed
separate trails planning documents. The most recent Parks Division trails planning document
was adopted by Council in 1993 and the most recent Transportation Systems Division trails
plan, the Non-Motorized Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan Update, was adopted in
2004. The City grown has and changed through new development and annexations since the
adoption of these documents.
The City is the hub of three major trails (Cedar River Trail, Lake Washington Loop Trail, and
the Interurban Trail). However, access to each of these trails and access between them, needs
improvement. In addition, the important smaller connections between neighborhoods, schools,
park facilities, and commercial and employment areas need identification and development.
•
Marcie Palmer,Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Page 2 of 2
April 21,2007
•
In an effort to prepare a consolidated trails network the Transportation Systems Division and the
Parks Division are partnering on preparing a joint plan. The Transportation Systems Division
received a$100,000 FFY 2004-2006 Statewide Transportation Enhancements Program grant
and also budgeted $52,719 in matching dollars to fund this project. The Parks Division has
$41,659 budgeted for plan development.
The goals are to identify and enhance those facilities that support and encourage recreational
bicycling, walking, skating, hiking, roller blading, and other forms of non-motorized recreational
use and to promote and encourage bicycle, pedestrian, or multi-modal commutes. This study
will identify and map a preferred non-motorized network that connects Renton's parks, regional
and local trail facilities, schools, libraries, employment areas, and transit hubs,thereby enhancing
economic vitality, recreational opportunity, and commuter transportation.
Final products will include:
A. Map
B. Planning Document
C. Trail Standards
D. Signage Standards
E. Safety Regulations
F. Web Page •
Supplemental Agreement # 2 is needed to have the consultant provide individual project sheets
for approximately 50 non-motorized routes within the planning document and for additional
work to identify preferred routes for the existing facilities map.
cc: Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
Peter Hahn,Deputy Public Works Administrator—Transportation
Leslie Betlach,Parks Director
Jim Seitz,Transportation Planning&Programming Supervisor
Dan Hasty,Transportation Planning
File
•
H:\File Sys\TRP-Transportation Planning&Programming\Non-motorized\Bike Route Study&Map\Trails and Bikeways Plan Issue Paper#2.doc
411116.
� Washington State
V!/ Department of Transportation
Supplemental Agreement
Organization and Address
MacLeod Reckord
Number 2 (TWO) 231 Summit Avenue East
Seattle, WA 98102
Original Agreement Number
Phone: 206-323-7919
Project Number Execution Date Completion Date
Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable
Renton Trails & Bikeways Plan & Map $ 174,850.50
Description of Work
Trail and bikeway planning, design, and mapping.
The Local Agency of City of Renton
desires to supplement the agreement entered into with MacLeod Reckord
and executed on March 21, 2007 and identified as Agreement No.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
• Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
Provide Existing Routes/Facilities mapping, and additional Individual Project Sheets for final report.
Also see attached scope for additional detail.
II
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION,is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read:
P December 31. 2008
III
Section V, PAYMENT,shall be amended d d as follows:
Increase of$16,719.30
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A,and by this reference made a part of this supplement
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By: Connie Reckord, Principal By:
Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature
• DOT Form 140200 EF Date
Revised 912005
EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work •
Supplemental #2
February 16, 2007
April 1, 2008
RENTON TRAILS & BIKEWAYS PLAN & MAP
Project No:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
During the term of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT (MacLeod Reckord) and identified
SUBCONSULTANTS shall perform professional services in connection with the following
project:
Renton Trails & Bikeways Plan & Map
Scope
The scope of work shall include the furnishing of all services, labor, materials, equipment,
supplies, and incidentals necessary to conduct and complete the work as indicated herein. The
work to be performed includes trail and bikeway planning and design, transportation planning,
signage design guidelines, and stakeholder and agency coordination assistance to the City of
Renton.
•
Project Area
The Project Area is identified as the area inside the City of Renton limits. For purposes of
evaluating transportation influences of surrounding areas, document research will extend
beyond City limits, and include potential annexation areas and neighboring City/County
jurisdictions.
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
1. MacLeod Reckord — Project management, agency coordination, public outreach
coordination, trail and bikeway planning, document production, project oversight.
2. Transportation Engineering NW—Transportation planning, traffic analysis, demand
forecasting, transportation department coordination
3. Andrew R. Goulding SEGD—Wayfinding studies, signage design guidelines and
graphic design coordination.
GENERAL PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
1. Meetings and deliverables have been included in the scope as outlined herein.
2. The CITY is responsible for advertising/notification and providing the venue for
committee meetings and public meetings/open houses.
•
1
3. The CITY will be responsible for collection of comments from CITY Staff, presentation to
• Park Board, and resolving conflicting comments, and will submit one set of consolidated
comments to the CONSULTANT for each submittal.
4. No permits are anticipated for completion of this work.
5. Mapping for the report and final CITY trails and bikeways map will be generated from
digital information made available by the CITY and currently available internet sources
and documents. While CITY-generated GIS information is not available, the
CONSULTANT will make use of King County GIS data in evaluating data for the report
and map. The final electronic files for the report will be in Publisher and pdf formats and
the final electronic files for the map will be in AutoCAD and pdf formats, with layering
organized to be easily transferable to GIS format. Graphic design of map and safety
flyer will be consistent with CITY's public information program.
6. Detailed design of trails, bikeways, or facilities to accommodate same (structural
components, drainage, lighting, road improvements, etc.) is not anticipated for this
project.
SCHEDULE
The scope of work is premised on a Notice-to-Proceed date of approximately March 12, 2007
with an 8-month project duration for completion of the final report and map on or about
November 30, 2007.
A draft schedule is included in this scope and a baseline schedule will be generated at the time
• of Notice to Proceed and is subject to change based on mutual agreement between the CITY
and the CONSULTANT.
DELIVERABLES
Deliverables will be provided as noted herein. Software will include (versions no higher than)
AutoCAD release 2007, Office 2003, Word 2003, Publisher 2003, Excel 2003, PowerPoint 200.3,
and pdf files. Other software programs as approved.
DOCUMENTS AND DATA PROVIDED BY THE CITY
The following documents and data are requested by the CONSULTANT and will be supplied by
the CITY where feasible:
Existing Plans/Statements
• Draft Renton Trails Plan generated by Non-motorized Transportation Advisory
Committee (received)
• Renton Trails Plan (earlier version of above) available only in hard copy
• Trails/Non-Motorized Facility Plan generated by Public Works
• Goals/policies statements or documents from Parks and Public Works relating to trails
and non-motorized facilities
• City Comprehensive Plan, or relevant components of same (Parks, Recreation, Open
Space, and Trails Element received)
• Cascade Bicycle Club publication 'Left By The Side Of The Road' (received)
• Park Rules and Regulations (received)
4110
• Regional sign standards as applicable
• Miscellaneous road or trail standards
2
Plans (Graphics) •
• Available City-wide mapping including aerial photographs in AutoCAD showing parcel
information, contour mapping, intersecting street and utility plans
• Potential Annexation Area plans, showing boundaries
• Major development/redevelopment plans for commercial, industrial, or residential areas
• Major utility development/redevelopment plans
• Road corridors identified for development/redevelopment (example given was road
system tentatively planned for 'road diet')
Exhibits
• Schedule for Non-motorized Transportation Advisory Committee, Transportation
Committee, Parks Board, Community Services Committee, City Council, and Mayoral
briefings (as established)
• Relevant correspondence/agreements that might affect trail routing considerations
• Traffic count data (as requested)
TASKS
1. Project Management
1.1 Coordination and Review: Coordinate the CONSULTANT design team to ensure that
the work is completed on schedule, is technically competent, and meets the CITY's
requirements. Develop and implement the work plan and provide overall coordination •
and review of the work. Organize and administer regular internal coordination meetings
of the design team to facilitate execution of the work.
1.2 Document Management: Provide for the management of drawings and documents
received and generated over the course of the project, including review, distribution,
filing, and storage.
1.3 Project Schedule: The CITY has established the overall project schedule at
approximately 8 months. A detailed schedule for the CONSULTANT work elements
shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT, with input from the CITY.
1.4 Subconsultant Management: SUBCONSULTANT management shall include the
preparation and execution of subcontracts with each SUBCONSULTANT involved in the
project. The CONSULTANT shall provide ongoing overview of progress, review of
invoices, and overall coordination of SUBCONSULTANTS involved in the project.
Products: 1) Contract Documents. 2) Schedule. 3) Invoicing.
Meetings: #1- MR and City staff for resolution/refinement of scope, schedule,
procedures.
(Team coordination meetings not involving City not itemized in scope)
Hours Anticipated: MR- 143, and additional 30 for MR for coordination and review of
added work under Tasks 5, 6, and 7, TENW- 0, ARG - 8
2. Information Review and Preliminary Documentation
41111
3
2.1 Document Review: Review documents and data made available by the CITY and from
• other sources, as relevant to the project. Meet with CITY staff and committees as
scheduled to become thoroughly knowledgeable on issues pertaining to the project.
Data may include components of the current comprehensive plan, existing transportation
studies, preliminary trail or non-motorized plans, past and current planning efforts,
potential annexation and land use modifications, natural and cultural resources, utility
and infrastructure information, design and construction standards, and political
directives. Generate a technical memorandum outlining findings with regard to
document search. Meetings are for purposes of gathering and clarifying information.
2.2 Generate Goals and Review Policies: Utilizing current information from available
documents, generate a draft statement of objectives and goals for developing trails and
bikeways plan. Review City policies with regard to conformance with stated goals and
make comments/additions to policy statements as appropriate. Review with CITY staff,
make final modifications based on CITY comment. It is anticipated CITY staff will gather
input from necessary committees or officials without CONSULTANT involvement. Final
statement of goals will be included in presentation material for Public Meeting #1.
2.3 Develop Public Outreach Plan: Based on discussions with CITY staff, generate a draft
public outreach plan, identifying anticipated dates for (2) meetings, major agenda items,
description of exhibits, procedures for notification and processing input, and expected
conclusions from meetings. Review with CITY staff, make final modifications based on
CITY comment. It is anticipated CITY staff will gather input from necessary committees
or officials without CONSULTANT involvement. It is anticipated CITY staff will be
responsible for distribution of notices, posting information on the CITY web site, and
coordinating meeting times and locations. CONSULTANT is responsible for providing
agenda, exhibits, processing input from meetings, and reporting.
1111 2.4 Develop Outline for Final Product: Provide draft format and outline major components
of final report for review and approval by CITY staff. Revisions to outline will be
incorporated in future updates of draft report.
Products: 1) Technical Memorandum summarizing information review. 2) Goals
Statement. 3) Public Outreach Plan. 4) Final Report Outline.
Meetings: #1- MR, TENW, ARG with City Staff for scope/document review and
clarification.
#2- MR with City Staff to review goals, discuss coordination with policies,
review public outreach plan, review draft report outline.
Hours Anticipated: MR- 135, TENW- 14, ARG- 8
3. Alignment Analysis
3.1 Assessment of Traffic Generators/Destination Service Areas and Corridor
Analysis: Using existing maps s and documents, field visits, and input from CITY staff we
Pp
will identify destinations st ations such as schools, recreation sites, employment, commercial and
centers, transit facilities, and other destinations as deemed important in the development
of the trails plan. Other trail segments, including equestrian, hiking, school walk routes,
and miscellaneous recreational corridors will be evaluated for connectivity potential. We
will ascertain where routes and corridors may be established to link critical features, and
where gaps exist. In addition, the team will evaluate up to three (3) different arterial or
• roadway corridors to be identified. The analysis will focus on accommodating
nonmotorized uses without adversely impacting traffic carrying capacity of the roadway.
4
Arterial operations, traffic forecasting, and intersection modeling using
Synchro/Simtraffic will be undertaken in close coordination with the City Traffic •
Operations Division and Transportation Planning Departments to ensure that both short-
term and long-term deficiencies and needs are addressed. Additional consideration may
be given to arterial calming measures where appropriate to improve shared use of
specific routes of vehicles/bicyclists within the same roadway cross-section, without
adversely impacting traffic carrying capacity of the roadway. Evaluation will also include
review of historical collision data for conflict zones between pedestrian/vehicles, review
of major crossing locations (separated trails crossing roadways) for sight distance and
control measures, and document known constraints to the system through City staff
interviews.
3.2 Inventory of Conditions and Opportunities: Using existing maps and documents,
field visits, and input from CITY staff, we will inventory potential corridors and map all
relevant conditions, identify opportunities for on-or off-road systems, and possible
amenities. Inventory and critique existing trail and bikeway signs.
3.3 Planning/Regulatory Investigation: Outline the planning regulations, processes and
requirements that may impact trail/bikeway design and development. Determine if there
are any zoning or regulatory issues that may affect the development of the trail/bikeway.
3.4 Presentation to Committee, and CITY Staff: Meet with Non-Motorized Transportation
Advisory Committee, and CITY Staff in two (2) meetings to review findings to date and
confirm format/agenda for public open house. It is anticipated CITY staff will gather
input from other necessary committees, Park Board, or other officials without
CONSULTANT involvement.
3.5 Public Open House #1: Incorporating input from presentation, revise and finalize
documents and exhibits for Public Open House#1. The purpose of this first public open
house will be to further develop the inventory of destinations, identify all potential trail •
and bikeway routes, confirm existing conditions and opportunities, refine the program
and to listen to concerns. The goal will be to solicit comments from the community to
supplement other inventory and research, and aid the team in evaluating corridors and
options. Presentation graphics may include goal statements, existing conditions maps,
aerial photographs, and site images.
Products: 1) Technical Memorandum summarizing the findings from the destination
survey, the planning and regulatory investigation and the opportunities and constraints
analysis. 2) Draft Exhibits for Presentation. 3) Final Exhibits for Public Open House. 4)
Updated Report Outline.
Meetings: #1- MR with City Staff to review findings, gather input.
#2- MR, TENW with City Staff and NMT Advisory Committee to discuss
findings, gather input, and coordinate agenda for Open House#1.
#3- MR, TENW, ARG for Public Open House #1
Hours Anticipated: MR- 306, TENW- 88, ARG- 20
4. Routing Options and Evaluation Criteria
4.1 Transportation Planning Analysis and Identification of Route Options. A planning
analysis will be undertaken to identify route alignment options for"thru traffic" of
nonmotorized users (namely bicyclists) through the downtown core. Consideration for
long term arterial traffic improvements, freeway enhancements, and other transportation •
projects will be identified and route choices for bike routes or bikeways through the
5
downtown core and across the Cedar River will be determined and evaluated in the
• context of general local and regional traffic circulation. The design team will identify a
city-wide network of signed trail and bikeway routes/lanes and generate typical cross
sections to illustrate types of facility improvements that may be considered (including
hiking, equestrian, and other lower volume/speed facilities). Pedestrian and bicycle
facility classifications will be identified, and routes will show integration with other
planned or existing trails, bikeways, or amenities. Specific safety-related issues such as
crossing improvements, school walk route improvements, or downtown core
improvements may be identified. Sign types, layouts and examples will be shown, as
specific examples. Kiosk siting will be addressed. Implementation and phasing, or
requirements associated with particular funding opportunities will be addressed.
4.2 Establish Evaluation Criteria. In order to logically evaluate route options we will
establish a draft list of criteria by which each route may be tested, developed from issues
discussed early in the inventory and research process. An evaluation of various routes
may include comparison of safety issues, easement or acquisition constraints,
connectivity to the local community and other trail opportunities, traffic type and volumes,
permit requirements, constructability, and construction costs, among other factors.
4.3 Committee and CITY Staff Review. Meet to review routing options and
recommendations and arrive at a consensus for evaluation criteria. The preferred
network of routes, and type of classification, will be refined.
4.4 Public Open House#2. This second open house will include a presentation of the
route options, evaluation criteria, cross sections, and other improvements. The goal of
the meeting will be to solicit comments from the public on the alternatives and seek
• consensus on a preferred network of routes. Comments from these meetings will be
incorporated into the Draft Trails and Bikeways Plan.
Product: 1)Map and drawings illustrating the route options and details of the trail and
bikeway cross sections and miscellaneous amenities. 2.) Technical memorandum and/or
comparison matrix, other supporting documents or illustrations as needed for evaluation.
3.) Draft exhibits for presentation. 4.) Final Exhibits for Public Open House.
Meetings: #1- MR with City Staff to review routing options, preliminary
recommendations, and evaluation criteria.
#2-MR with City Staff and NMT Advisory Committee to discuss routing
options, preferred recommendations, and evaluation criteria.
#3-MR, TENW, ARG for Public Open House #2.
Hours Anticipated: MR- 163, TENW- 32, ARG- 20
5. Draft Trails and Bikeways Plan & Map
5.1 Draft Plan. Incorporating comments from the public open house, committees, CITY
Staff, and Council, we will summarize our findings and make-a recommendation for the
preferred routing plan and specific route improvements in a Draft Trails and Bikeways
Plan and Map. Draft prioritized list of projects will be generated for each type of corridor:
transportation (for PNV) and recreation corridors (Parks). Sign types, layouts and
examples will be shown, as specific examples. We will also provide draft versions of the
maps to be published, the safety flyer, and web map for review and comment. Individual
• project sheets will be generated for approximately 50 routes, as identified by the City.
6
5.2 Presentation to Committee, and CITY Staff. Meet with Non-Motorized Transportation 1111
Advisory committee, and CITY Staff in two (2) meetings to present the draft plan
recommendations, the draft maps and exhibits, and seek comment. It is anticipated
CITY staff will gather input from other necessary committees, Park Board, or other
officials without CONSULTANT involvement.
5.3 Public Open House#3. Present the draft plan recommendations and seek comment.
5.4 City Council Presentation. Present input from the public open house, the draft plan
recommendations, and seek comment. Comments and revisions will be incorporated
into the Final Plan.
Product: 1) Draft Trails and Bikeways Plan. 2) Draft trails and bikeways maps, safety
flyer, and web map. 3.) Draft exhibits for presentations. 4.) Final Exhibits for Public
Open House
Meetings: #1- MR with City Staff to review draft plan and map.
#2- MR, TENW with City Staff and NMT Advisory Committee to discuss
draft plan and map.
#3- MR, TENW, ARG for Public Open House #3.
#4-MR to City Council with recommended draft plan and map.
Hours Anticipated: MR— 258, and additional 63 for MR for Individual Project Sheets,
TENW- 28, ARG - 20
6. Final Trails and Bikeways Plan & Map
from theopen houses, committees, •
6.1 Final Plan. Incorporating comments r mpublic p CITY
Staff, Park Board and Council, we will make final changes to the route map, narrative,
design standards, prioritized lists, project sheets, sign designs and implementation plan,
phasing recommendations, and appendices.
6.2 Final Map. Final revisions and 5,000 copies will be printed for distribution. Final version
of web map will be available electronically.
6.3 Final Safety Flyer. Final revisions and 20,000 copies of the pedestrian and bicycle
safety educational flyer will be printed for distribution.
Product: 1) Bound copies and one photo-ready unbound original report including all
narrative, maps, drawings, tables and appendices. 2) Computer disk with digital copy of
final report.
No Formal Meetings, final coordination via phone and email.
Hours Anticipated: MR- 192, and additional 14 for MR for Individual Project Sheets,
TENW- 10, ARG_--: 20
7. Existing Routes/Facilities Mapping
•
7
7.1 Route Selection and Identification. Utilizing information generated from Tasks 1
III through 6, identify preferred routes for existing facilities mapping. Develop legend, map
designations, coding system and other information to clarify preferred routes. Review with
City staff, provide final field check of routes, make final revisions, coordinate with printer,
and provide final proofing.
Product: 1) Final Existing Route/Facilities Map in electronic and hard copy form.
Reproduction is anticipated to be accomplished under task 6.4 noted above. No mass
printing/distribution of the Final Trails and Bikeway Plan is anticipated.
Meetings: #1 MR with City Staff to review draft map. Other meetings will be
combined with those of task 5.
Hours Anticipated: MR— 47
•
•
8
EXHIBIT E-1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT#2
Consultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet
1-Apr-08
III
Renton Trails& Bikeways Plan& Map
MacLeod Reckord
Direct Salary Cost
item Classification Hours Rate Cost
1. Project Management
Principal 12 41.00 492.00
Staff LA 18 30.00 540.00
Drafter - 27.00 0.00
WP -
18.00 0.00 Subtotal: 1,032.00
2. Existing Routes/Facilities Mapping
Principal 3 41.00 123.00
Staff LA 44 30.00 1,320.00
Drafter - 27.00 0.00
WP - 18.00 0.00 Subtotal: 1,443.00
3. Individual Project Sheets
Principal 5 41.00 205.00
Staff LA 66 30.00 1,980.00
Drafter 6 27.00 162.00
WP - 18.00 0.00 Subtotal: 2,347.00
TOTAL DSC: 4,822,00
Overhead(OH cost-including salary additives):
OH Rate X DSC of 185% X 4,822.00 8,920.70
III
Fixed Fee(FF):
FF Rate X DSC of 30% X 4,822.00 1,446.60
Relmbursables 0
covered in original contract
Subconsultant Costs 1,530
6 hours at each$90 and$165
GRAND TOTAL: $16,719.30
Prepared by: Connie Reckord 4/1/2008
III
MacLeod Reckotd SUPPLEMENTAL#2 FEE DERIVATION
Landscape Architacta Renton (rails&Bikeways Plan&Map
• Date: Apr, 1, 2.008
HOUR
TASK PRINC t;,A, DRAFT WP nates
'€(# F PO:V'C Mdt4lg..�a1EP#T" Wt3@a:1i511�#RlSTlON <
1.1 t*dinatfon and Review
COrmr,ppryieric>2 4 i 6
Ptiriter ccordinataon1 48
.RRevieWla rrinteatICINQ0
Subtotal hours 12 18
0 EArrft nRC,< jFA< 'i:€ClP PF
2.1 tvleppirtg -
F �a11 e tcy�e;7diraap desfgr>atians $ 4
D y. Coding S,ystero 4.
Map Layout G
Photchtete Layout 1 3
Evac. routes from field work £3
Eval/r:corps rout fr.KC bike map 6
2:2 Field Waci,:
Field cheek routes
SUtilotal hours 3 - 44
3:1 Draft Individual Project Sheaf
Draft terrptatea,reuree to final 1 4
• Approx.50.proje.;t sheets 2 33 6
3.2 Fist311rsd'sv di ai Preat Si eet 2 12
Subtotat hoiurs6' 66 a
SJBL 's L MACLEfg)k#~ t'itI D t 20 12£3 .S -
,
EXHIBIT E-1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT#2
Consultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet
1-Apr-08 III
Renton Trails&Bikeways Plan& Map
MacLeod Reckord
Direct Salary Cost
Item Classification Hours Rate Cost
1. Project Management
Principal 12 41.00 492.00
Staff LA 18 30.00 540.00
Drafter - 27.00 0.00
WP - 18.00 0.00 Subtotal: 1,032.00
2. Existing Routes/Facilities Mapping
Principal 3 41.00 123.00
Staff LA 44 30.00 1,320.00
Drafter - 27.00 0.00
WP - 18.00 0.00 Subtotal: 1,443.00
3. Individual Project Sheets
Principal 5 41.00 205.00
Staff LA 66 30.00 1,980.00
Drafter 6 27.00 162.00
WP - 18.00 0.00 Subtotal: 2,347.00
TOTAL DSC: 4,822.00
Overhead(OH cost-including salary additives):
OH Rate X DSC of 185% X 4,822.00 8,920.70
Ill
Fixed Fee(FF):
FF Rate X DSC of 30% X 4,822.00 1,446.60
Reimbursables 0
covered in original contract
Subconsuttant Costs 1,530
6 hours at each$90 and$165
GRAND TOTAL: $16,719.30
Prepared by: Connie Reckord 4/1/2008
MacLeod Reckord SUPPLEMENTAL#2 FEE DERIVATION
Landscape Architects Renton Trails&Bikeways Plan& Map
• Date: Apr. 1, 2008
HOURS
TASK PRINC LA DRAFT WP notes
1:0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT&ADMINISTRATION
1.1 Coordination and Review
Correspondence 4 6
Printer coordination 4
Review/comment/QA/QC 8 8
Subtotal hours 12 18
2.0 EXISTING ROUTES/FACILITIES MAPPING
2.1 Mapping
Finalize legend/map designations 2 4
Dev.Coding system 4
Map Layout 6
Photo/note Layout 1 8
Eval.addit'I routes from field work 8
Eval/incorp.routes fr.KC bike map 6
2.2 Field Work
Field check routes 8
Subtotal hours 3 44
3.0 INDIVIDUAL PROJECT SHEETS "
3.1 Draft Individual Project Sheets
Draft templates,revise to final 1 4
410 Approx.50 project sheets 2 50 6
3.2 Final Individual Project Sheets 2 12
Subtotal hours 5 66 6 -
SUBTOTAL MACLEOD RECKORD 20 128 6 -
•
i
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
i
AI#: / ' f r
• Submitting Data: Public Works For Agenda of: April 21, 2008
Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems
Staff Contact Lys Hornsby, x7239 Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Code Modification Ordinance for Utility Discounts for Correspondence..
Low Income Seniors and Disabled Residents Ordinance X
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Minutes of March 10, 2008 Study Sessions
Ordinance Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept X
Finance Dept X
Other
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
As approved by Council on March 10, 2008, modifications to the Renton Municipal Code Title
VIII (Health and Sanitation) are proposed to allow for the following changes:
Eliminate the 2-tier structure (40 percent and 75 percent) and implement a single discount level of
50 percent. Eliminate the 900 cubic feet of water subsidy to send a consistent water conservation
message to all customers. Under the new 50 percent discount program, offer customers the
option of a 32-gallon can for solid waste service. For our lowest income customers, retain the
existing 75 percent subsidy program only for those customers (approximately 100) currently
enrolled. Provide additional outreach to low-income senior/disabled customers to increase 1
participation, assist in determining eligibility and help with the application process.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the proposed modifications to Renton Municipal Code Title VIII (Health and Sanitation)
and adopt the ordinance.
•
C:\DOCUME-1\BWalton\LOCALS—1\Temp\Agenda Bill Low Income Disabled Rate Code Ordinance.doc\LHtp
arch 10,2008 1 Renton City Council Minutes Page 76
Community Services: City Community Services Department recommended approval of a contract in the
• Space Planning&Move amount of$224,000 with Heery International for space planning, architectural,
Management, Heery and move management services necessitated by the Benson Hill Communities
International Annexation. Council concur.
Community Services: Parks Community Services Department recommended approval of the Parks
Consultant Roster Consultant Roster, valid from March 2008 to December 2010, listing 66
professional consultants. Council concur.
Community Services: Police Community Services Department recommended approval of a contract in the
Department Locker Purchase, amount of$251,442.48 with sole source supplier Saxton, Bradley, Inc. to
Saxton Bradley purchase lockers for the Police Department. Council concur.
Fire: Records Management Fire and Emergency Services Department recommended approval of a contract
System, FDM Software in the amount of$24,340.78 with FDM Software Ltd. for software support and
maintenance related to the department's records management system. Council
concur.
Utility: Annual Consultant Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the annual roster of
Roster, Telemetry & SCADA consultants chosen to provide telemetry and supervisory control and data
acquisition (SCADA) services, which is valid from March 2008 to March 2009
and lists nine professional consultants. Council concur.
MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Parker presented a report
Planning& Development regarding the City Code Title IV (Development Regulations) docket. The
Committee Committee recommended that a public hearing be set on 3/24/2008 to consider
• Planning: Development the proposed commercial office residential (COR), assisted living, helipad, and
Regulations (Title IV) Docket utilities height zoning text amendments. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED
g
Review BY ZWICKER COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval of
Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 269561 -270146 and three wire transfers totaling
$5,365,841.39; and approval of 163 Payroll Vouchers, one wire transfer, and
699 direct deposits totaling $2,420,934.61. MOVED BY PERSSON,
SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services: Urban & Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending
Community Forestry concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the contract with Worthy
Development Plan, Worthy and Associates, LLC, in the amount of$119,654 to provide consulting services
and Associates for an Urban and Community Forestry Development Plan. The Committee
further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute
the contract. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Utility: Low-Income Senior Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report regarding utility discount
Utility Rates rates for low-income senior/disabled residents. The Committee recommended
concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the following:
• Eliminate the two-tier structure (40 percent and 75 percent) and implement
• a single discount level of 50 percent.
• Eliminate the 900 cubic feet of water subsidy to send a consistent water
conservation message to all customers.
March 10,2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 77
• Under the new 50 percent discount program, offer customers the option of a
32-gallon can for solid waste service. •
• For the lowest income customers, retain the existing 75 percent subsidy
program only for those customers (approximately 100) currently enrolled.
• Provide additional outreach to low-income senior/disabled customers to
increase participation, assist in determining eligibility and help with the
application process.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
RESOLUTIONS AND The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and
ORDINANCES adoption:
Ordinance#5360 An ordinance was read amending the City of Renton 2008 Budget as adopted by
EDNSP: Farmers Market Ordinance 5325 creating a new fund for Farmers Market revenues and expenses
Funding, Budget Amend and appropriating revenues and expenses in the net amount of$46,492.19.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance#5361 An ordinance was read amending the City of Renton 2008 Budget as adopted by
Budget: 2008 Amendment, Ordinance 5325, in the total amount of$1,189,368, to provide for costs to serve
Benson Hill Communities the Benson Hill Communities Annexation area. MOVED BY BRIERE,
Annexation SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance#5362 An ordinance was read amending the City of Renton 2008 Budget as adopted by
Finance: Carry Forward Ordinance 5325, in the total amount of$31,097,336, to carry forward to 2008
Ordinance funds'appropriated in 2007, but not expended in 2007. MOVED BY •
PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #5363 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 10, Parking Regulations, of Title X
Legal: Parking Sign (Traffic), of City Code by amending Section 6, Signs And/Or Markings
Regulations Required. MOVED BY TAYLOR, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL
ADOPT THEORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilmember Corman extended his appreciation to Council President Palmer
Council: Workshop (3/6 & and City staff for their work related to the Council offsite workshop held on
3/7) March 6 and 7. He stated that new territory was covered and the workshop was
very productive.
Citizen Comment: Patti - 116th Councilmember Taylor reported receipt of an e-mail from Frank Patti (Renton)
Ave SE, Speed Limit Increase requesting that the speed limit be increased from 25 to 35 miles per hour on a
one-mile stretch of 116th Ave. SE, from SE 168th St. to Puget Dr. SE, to match
the rest of the street's speed limit of 35 miles per hour. MOVED BY TAYLOR,
SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Annexation: Benson Hill Councilmember Zwicker and Mayor Law acknowledged the success of the
Communities, Open House Benson Hill Communities Annexation area informational open house held on
March 8, and they thanked everyone involved for coordinating the event.
Citizen Comment: Guthrie - Councilmember Zwicker reported receipt of an e-mail from Trish Guthrie (King
Shamrock Annexation, County), Co-President of Ellis Park Homeowners Association, requesting •
Application Fee Waiver waiver of the $2,500 filing fee for the proposed Shamrock Annexation.
MOVED BY ZWICKER, SECONDED BY TAYLOR, COUNCIL REFER
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
• ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 1, GARBAGE, CHAPTER 2, STORM AND
SURFACE WATER, CHAPTER 4, WATER, AND CHAPTER 5, SEWERS,
OF TITLE VIII (HEALTH AND SANITATION) OF ORDINANCE NO.
4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY ADJUSTING CURRENT UTILITY
DISCOUNT RATES FOR LOW-INCOME SENIOR/DISABLED
RESIDENTS.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Number 2 of Subsection 8-1-10A, Residential Customers, of
Chapter 1, Garbage, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
• 2. Senior and/or disabled customers who qualified under RMC 8-4-31C for low-
income rates for a seventy-five percent (75%) subsidy prior to May 31, 2008, are
eligible for a one dollar sixty cents ($1.60) fee for mini-can service. For services
other than mini-can, the rate schedule above will apply. All senior and/or disabled
customers qualifying under RMC 8-4-31C for low-income rates after May 31,
2008, are eligible for a fifty percent (50%) subsidy of the charges for the service
level selected.
SECTION II. Subsection 8-2-2G, Special Rates, of Chapter 2, Storm and Surface
Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
•
1
ORDINANCE NO.
G. Special Rates:
1. For a seventy-five percent (75%) rate subsidy for senior and/or disabled low-
income customers:
a. Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualified under RMC 8-4-31C for low-
income rates prior to August 1, 1994, are eligible for rates of one dollar fifty-
four cents ($1.54) per month.
b. Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualify under RMC 8-4-31 C for low-
income rates after August 1, 1994 and prior to May 31, 2008, are eligible for
rates of one dollar eighty-five cents ($1.85)per month.
2. All senior and/or disabled citizens qualifying under RMC 8-4-31 C for low-
income rates after May 31, 2008 are eligible for a fifty percent (50%) subsidy
equal to a rate of three dollars and seventy-one cents ($3.71) per month. •
SECTION III. Subsection 8-4-31C, Senior Citizens And Disabled Persons, of
Chapter 4, Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Senior Citizens And Disabled Persons: The following is hereby established for
certain senior citizens and disabled persons who are economically disadvantaged
as herein set forth:
1. Low-Income Seniors: A "low-income senior citizen" is defined as a person
sixty-one (61) years of age or older who resides in a single-family dwelling that is
separately metered with a City water meter for water usage, either as owner,
purchaser, or renter, and whose total income, including that of his or her spouse or
co-tenant, does not exceed the annual income threshold for low-income rate •
2
ORDINANCE NO.
eligibility. The annual income threshold for eligibility for low-income rate shall
• be adjusted each calendar year, using the Income Guidelines for King County as
provided annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) and King County's qualifying income criteria for a senior
citizen/disability property tax exemption. Any household with a disposable
income of thirty percent (30%) or less of the median household income for King
County and qualified for a subsidy prior to May 31, 2008, will be eligible for a
seventy-five percent (75%) rate subsidy. All other households with an annual
disposable income less than King County's maximum qualifying income for a
senior citizen/disability property tax exemption are eligible for a fifty percent
(50%) rate subsidy. For the calendar year 2008, those figures for a seventy-five
percent (75%) rate subsidy shall be sixteen thousand three hundred fifty dollars
• ($16,350) or less per annum for single occupancy and eighteen thousand seven
hundred dollars ($18,700) or less per annum for double occupancy, and thirty-five
thousand dollars ($35,000) or less per annum for a fifty percent (50%) rate
subsidy. For households with more than two (2) individuals qualifying under
subsection C of this Section, an additional five thousand dollars ($5,000) is added
to the income threshold per qualifying individual.
2. Low-Income Disabled Citizen: A "low-income disabled citizen" is defined as:
a) a person qualifying for special parking privileges under RCW 46.16.381(1)(a)
through (f); b) a blind person as defined in RCW 74.18.020; c) a disabled,
handicapped, or incapacitated person as defined under any other existing State or
Federal program; or d) a person on home kidney dialysis treatment who resides in
3
ORDINANCE NO.
a single-family dwelling that is separately metered for water usage, either as •
owner, purchaser or renter, and whose total income, including that of his or her
spouse or co-tenant, does not exceed the annual income threshold for eligibility
for low-income rate.
3. Qualified Persons:
a. Every such person (if double occupancy, then both household members)
shall meet either of the above requirements to qualify for senior citizen and
disabled rate(s). Every such person (if double occupancy, then both household
members) shall file with the Utilities billing section of the City, his or her
affidavit, that he/she or they are qualified to be charged the special rate for
such utility services herein stated.
b. Such statement shall contain such other information as the Utilities billing •
section may prescribe, including but not limited to address, ownership or
interest in the dwelling occupied by such applicant(s), amount, source and
nature of all income from any and all sources, together with the applicant's
unqualified promise to forthwith notify the City of any circumstances or
change in condition which would make the applicant(s) ineligible to receive
said special rate(s). The Utilities billing section may establish rules and
procedures for implementing this Section.
4. Low-Income Rates:
a For a seventy-five percent (75%) rate subsidy:
(1) For those senior citizens and disabled persons who qualified as
economically disadvantaged and were on this low-income rate prior to •
4
ORDINANCE NO.
August 1, 1994, the following rate for water service relating to such
•
single-family dwelling in which such eligible person or persons
permanently reside is one dollar twenty cents ($1.20) per month, limited to
nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per month. Any water
consumption over nine hundred (900) cubic feet per month shall be
charged as provided in subsections A and B of this Section.
(2) For those senior citizens and disabled persons who qualify as
economically disadvantaged, and were on this low-income rate after
August 1, 1994 and prior to May 31, 2008, the following rate for water
service relating to such single-family dwelling in which such eligible
person or persons permanently reside is two dollars fifty-three cents
($2.53) per month, limited to nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per
month. Any water consumption over nine hundred (900) cubic feet per
month shall be charged as provided in subsections A and B of this Section,
except for those persons who qualify under home kidney dialysis. These
customers are limited to one thousand seven hundred (1,700) cubic feet of
water per month before any excess is charged as provided in subsections A
and B of this Section.
b. For all other senior citizens and/or disabled persons who qualify for low-
income rates according to the criteria in subsections Cl and C2 of this Section
after May 31, 2008, they will be eligible for a fifty percent (50%) subsidy on
•
5
the charges for water service relating to such single-family dwelling in which
such eligible person or persons permanently reside. The 50% subsidy will
apply to the basic charge and commodity charge only.
5. For those senior citizens, sixty-one (61) years of age or older and/or disabled
citizens, when such seniors and/or disabled citizens are not otherwise eligible for
special rates as low-income seniors and/or disabled citizens, but who qualify for
property tax exemption pursuant to RCW 84.36.381(5)(a) and are not residents of
the City shall be exempt from the fifty percent (50%) utility surcharge applicable
to those customers not residents of the City. To receive this exemption the
applicant must provide the information required under subsection C3 of this
Section.
SECTION IV. Note 4 of subsection 8-15-5D, Additional Charges, of Chapter 5,
Sewers, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General •
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4. Senior and/or disabled low-income rates:
a. For a seventy-five percent (75%) subsidy:
(1) Senior and/or disabled low-income citizens who qualified under RMC
8-4-31C for low-income rates prior to August 1, 1994, are eligible for a
rate of twenty-seven dollars and ninety-five cents ($27.95) per month and
a rate adjustment charge of fifty-six cents ($0.56) per month payable to
King County Wastewater, and one dollar thirty-four cents ($1.34) per
month for City sewer charges for a total of twenty-nine dollars and eighty-
five cents ($29.85).
•
6
ORDINANCE NO.
(2) Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualify under RMC 8-4-31 C for
• low-income rates after August 1, 1994, andprior to May31, 2008, are
g
eligible for a rate of twenty-seven dollars and ninety-five cents ($27.95)
per month and a rate adjustment charge of fifty-six cents ($0.56) per
month payable to King County Wastewater, and three dollars eighty-nine
cents ($3.89) per month for City sewer charges for a total of thirty-two
dollars and forty cents ($32.40).
b. All other senior and/or disabled citizens qualifying under RMC 8-4-31 C
for low-income rates after May 31, 2008, are eligible for a fifty percent (50%)
subsidy equal to twenty-seven dollars and ninety-five cents ($27.95) per
month and a rate adjustment charge of fifty-six cents ($0.56) per month
payable to King County Wastewater, and seven dollars seventy-eight cents
• ($7.78) per month for City sewer charges for a total of thirty-six dollars and
twenty-nine cents ($36.29).
SECTION V. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty
(30) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008.
• Denis Law, Mayor
7
ORDINANCE NO.
Approved as to form: •
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
. Date of Publication:
ORD.1449:3/24/08:scr
•
•
8
7 ,e DRQ: 1
G tl C3vNCEL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT Date '17V-oDOr'
April 21,2008,
Release of Restrictive.Covenants for 6,000 Square Foot Lots
• (Referred:April 14, 2008)
• The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff .
recommendation to approve the release of the restrictive covenants placed by King.County on
older plats restricting lot size and width to standards diff erent than current City`.zoning
standardsfor:the property.
The.Committee finds that-the requirements'for approving a'`release of these restrictions are
met. The change in comprehensive plan designation and,zoning ofthe properties constitutes:a
• change in circumstance. The restrictions are now undesirable as they prevent properties from.
being developed to the standards anticipated under approved existingzoning and development ,
• -standards: The application of these`outdated restrictions are also'found to be duly burdensome
to the property owners as they are:thereby;prevented from'exercising the same property rights :
as owners-of similarly zoned properties,
The Committeefurther recommends' that"Council direct staff-to ignore these outdated
•
restrict'
4061
• e
Rich Zwicker, Vi - . •air
Greg'1'a,¢_or,Member
cc: Alex Pietsch,.CED Administrator
Neil Watts,Development Services Director
Larry Warren;City Attorney •
Jennifer Henning,Cuirent Planning Manager
Fred Kau-Cnaan, Heathy 'xamm/ne✓
H:/Division.s/Develop.ser/Admin/Temporary'Does/L.ot Sizes-Comm Report.doc
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ' 6-117 COUNCIL ,
COMMITTEE'REPORT _ i'
Date -a/ ga'r'
April'21,2008
City Code Title IV(Development Regulations)Docket
The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence.-in the Planning Commission
recommendation to approve docket item 06-28,Assisted Living,as follows:
• Create a new definition for assisted living to replace retirement residence. '
• Revise the definition for convalescent centers to clarify thata skilled nursing staff
administers convalescent,care. , '_
• Apply density standards to assisted living facilities,but allow them to develop at a ratio of _ '
1.5 units per the;base density of the zone. - . -
' • ` Allow assisted living facilities in the R-14 zone.
• ' : • Limit assisted living facilities in the R-1 and R-10 zones to a maximum of 18 total residential
units per acre.
• Include assisted living the parking standards table:and require 1 parking space per residential ;'
unit of assisted living,.plus dedicated-parking spaces for facility`fleet vehicles: ,
The Committee further recommends concurrence-in..the Planning'Commission recommendation to, " -
. approve-;for docket item 07-01,"fieight•,Requirement for Utilities;in Residential Zones,as follows. `
• The proposed height for above ground-ands elevated'water;reservoirs and public utility of' - '_
1 • 175 feet for above ground standpipe.water'reservoir, an`,-elevated water tank, a water
treatment facility to the highestpoint of_the;water storage reservoir , : ,
50 feet maximum height for water facilities,such'as water'treatment facilities;and pump
stations..
•• Allow additional setbacks for:water treatment facilities and,:pump:stations trough the_ - "
' ' administrative site plan review:process:; _ .
g gh
- • Allow modification to lot covera'e�,thruu. the administrative site plan review process. ,
' • ';Require graphic treatment of new water'tanks"-to bereviewed by the Renton Municipal Arts .'
Commission
ng Parker air
lb
' Rich Zwicker, 'ce Chair '
C\'
Greg Taybr;Member
C: Rebecca Lind
Alex Pietsch •
APPROVE-6 BY
cErli7 COUNCIL
Date ,V= t:00?
COMMUNITY-SERVICES.
COMMITTEE REPORT
April 21, 2008
Appointment of Ed Prince to the Planning Commission _
(April.7,2008) '
The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in Mayor.Law's appointment
of Ed Prince for an unexpired term(expiring,06130/10)4F°the,Planning Commission.
40; i . o
/Tcrn Briere,
t..
King Parker,Vice-Chair
andy Conn Member
C: Rebecca Lind . - . '` . . ," . . -- .-
Ar:MOVED BY
'H G l COUNCIL
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE Date0?-/-0100y9
COMMITTEEE REPORT
April 21,200$
• 1st Round 2008 Neighborhood Grant Projects
(Referred April 7,2008)
The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to
approve the following grant awards.
1. Downtown Committee/South Renton Neighborhood Association,=The project
•
includes a Spring Clean Up and plant assorted plants in containers in the Downtown:.
2. LaCrosse Homeowners Association—The project consists of placing two entrance
signs at the north and south entrances into the neighborhoods .$454_; . ..
3. .Liberty Ridge Homeowners Association-The project consists of creating a small_
•
playground and installing a bench, swings, and a play structure with appropriate
landscaping:_$23,517
• 4 Maureen Highlands Homeowners Association ,The project consists of
• : •landscaping around a neighborhood retention pond-and adding benches,doggie
stations,`trashcans,andnewsletter holders: $7,860
5. May Creek Homeowners Association=Project con'sists`ofre replacing an ekisting
•
p g
fence,which was part of the original development`in 1989. $2;871,
6.. `'Parkside Court,Homeowners Association.-Project consists of cleanup and ,
• landscaping around the neighborhood retention pond. $3,039
7. Renton:-11111 Neighborhood Association Project consists of placing two
neighborhood od entrancesigns at Dints ofentry ort R nton Ave
S &1-405 and Cedar
Ave:S &I-405: .$8,210
8. Rolling'
Rollin Hills Homeowners Homeow
ner
s Association
.ProJectconsists
onsists
o_
f installingan imp
rove
fence barrier to comply with Washington State Department of Healthmandate:
$6,087 _ _
9. _The Vineyards Homeowners Association-Project,consists of a sandblasted`
entrance rock sign. $4,224:
10. Tiffany Park Neighborhood Association-Project is to continue development of a;
_ neighborhood park,.Ginger.Creek Urban Park, located on Seattle Public Utilities
owned right-of-way in Renton. $1,189-
11:,Victoriw.Park Homeowners Association=Project consists of installing an entrance
sign,with lighting,at the south entrance into the neighborhood.,$2,782.
12:Windwood Homeowners Association —"Project_consists of landscape improvements
at front entrance and lights installation around the entrance sign: $1;100
13: Windwood Homeowners Association —Project consists of placing Signs within the
neighborhood to identify areas where children play and signs to encourage residents
to clean up after their,pets: $1,152
2008 Neighborhood Grants- 1s`Round
The Committee further recommends approval of funding for the following administrative
newsletter applications:
1. Aster Park Homeowners Association-Annual,costs-,for a newsletter printed.,
quarterly and distributed door-to-door. $3b
2. Earlington Neighborhood Association-Annual costs for a newsletterprinted
quarterly and distributed door-to-door and by USPS. _$440
3. Heritage Garden Estates.Homeowners 7 Annual,costsfor a newsletter printed and
distributed by USPS six times a year. $50 • =
4.' Liberty Ridge Homeowners Association—Annual costs fora newsletter printed
quarterly and distributed.by USPS. $572 : .
5. ' Maureen Highlands Homeowners Association Annual costs for a newsletter
printed and distributed door-to-door twice a year. $125
6. North Renton Neighborhood:Association. Annual costs for a newsletter printed
quarterlyand distributed door-to-door.:-:$915
' 7. Renton Hill-Neighborhood_Association-Annual costs fora newsletterprinted and
distributed door-to-door twice a:year,.::.$433
8. Rolling Hills Homeowners,Association.—Annual costs for a newsletter printed and
distributed door-to-door and by USPS: $330 •
9. Summit Park Homeowners Association—Annual costs for a newsletter printed and
distributed door-to-door twice a year: 34$ : • r;
; 10..Victoria Park Homeowners-Association:=Annual costs for'a newsletter printed'and
tri ted by USPS. ,$248;
dis bu �{. :.
This frst=round of applications totals$68.,053 -leaving a balance Of$8;947. A second round will -
follow,with,a deadline for=applicationsof.October:10,2008:
!Terri : .- - C'' s
King,Parker;Vice=Chair•.
R dy Gorman;'Member
cc: Norma McQuiller
Suzanne Dale Estey
Alex Pietsch
Arne O D'BY . .
CJI COUNCIL' i ,
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
Date Ai' 0'9d .
April 21,2008 ,
Engineering Consultant Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. '
for Automatic-Meter Reading System :. . ,
- (Referred.April;14, 2008)• ' .
- The:.Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the;
engineering consultant agreement and authorize'the Mayor and City'Clerk_'-to:`sign.the =
' agreement with HDR Engineering,Inc., in the.amount,of$80,928.00, for,professional services
to support.the .City's acquisition, development' andimplementation.of an Automatic'Meter
Re in ad s' stem.
g Y
etre - 471/ :..
Rich Zwicker,:Cha' - -
: , C _ "
` reg T4tor, ,air - ,
41P-4410(1- _
Member j - .
cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director -
Abdoul Gafour,Water Utility Supervisor ,
Pp "OED :Y
u9 COUNCIL.
�t 4/a-/-a oo
- PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE"
COMMITTEE;REPORT .
. April 21,2008
Res
. - Fire"Department ponse Times
(August 20,2007) •
The Public.Safety Committeewas briefed on this issue in 2007 and recommends no changes
in thecurrent policy at this time.
Greglor, Chair.
•
Don Persson,Member
cc: I.David Daniels,Fire"Chief/Emergen+cy Services Administrator
Chuck Duffy,Deputy Fire Chief
Joan Montegary,Adminsitrative Secretary.II"
APPROVED BY . ._
CITY COU CIL
- Date
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE.REPORT
April 21,2008 -
Ratification of First Amendment to Valley Communications Center Interlocal;Agreement
(April 7,2008) _
The Public Safety Committee recommends concurrence it the staff rrecommendation to.
authorize'-Mayor Denis Law to ratify the First Amendment. to Valley, Communications -
Center's governing interlocal agreement.
•
•
Greg` a or, Chair •
•
•
•
- It
on P on .Member
•
cc: i . &cor'r
C'�rcf x 7 av,d JYI'CJs
040708 1st amendment VCC Interlocal Agreement cmte report.doc\
rev 01/O8 bh
i
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
• ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 1, GARBAGE, CHAPTER 2, STORM AND
SURFACE WATER, CHAPTER 4, WATER, AND CHAPTER 5, SEWERS,
OF TITLE VIII (HEALTH AND SANITATION) OF ORDINANCE NO.
4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY ADJUSTING CURRENT UTILITY
DISCOUNT RATES FOR LOW-INCOME SENIOR/DISABLED
RESIDENTS.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFRENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Number 2 of Subsection 8-1-10A, Residential Customers, of
Chapter 1, Garbage, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
• 2. Senior and/or disabled customers who qualified under RMC 8-4-31 C for low-
income rates for a seventy-five percent (75%) subsidy prior to May 31, 2008, are
eligible for a one dollar sixty cents ($1.60) fee for mini-can service. For services
other than mini-can, the rate schedule above will apply. All senior and/or disabled
customers qualifying under RMC 8-4-31C for low-income rates after May 31,
2008, are eligible for a fifty percent (50%) subsidy of the charges for the service
level selected.
SECTION II. Subsection 8-2-2G, Special Rates, of Chapter 2, Storm and Surface
Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
•
1
V h
ORDINANCE NO.
G. Special Rates: •
1. For a seventy-five percent (75%) rate subsidy for senior and/or disabled low-
income customers:
a. Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualified under RMC 8-4-31 C for low-
income rates prior to August 1, 1994, are eligible for rates of one dollar fifty-
four cents ($1.54) per month.
b. Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualify under RMC 8-4-31 C for low-
income rates after August 1, 1994 and prior to May 31, 2008, are eligible for
rates of one dollar eighty-five cents ($1.85) per month.
2. All senior and/or disabled citizens qualifying under RMC 8-4-31 C for low-
income rates after May 31, 2008 are eligible for a fifty percent (50%) subsidy
equal to a rate of three dollars and seventy-one cents ($3.71) per month. •
SECTION III. Subsection 8-4-31C, Senior Citizens And Disabled Persons, of
Chapter 4, Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. Senior Citizens And Disabled Persons: The following is hereby established for
certain senior citizens and disabled persons who are economically disadvantaged
as herein set forth:
1. Low-Income Seniors: A "low-income senior citizen" is defined as a person
sixty-one (61) years of age or older who resides in a single-family dwelling that is
separately metered with a City water meter for water usage, either as owner,
purchaser, or renter, and whose total income, including that of his or her spouse or
co-tenant, does not exceed the annual income threshold for low-income rate •
2
1
ORDINANCE NO.
eligibility. The annual income threshold for eligibility for low-income rate shall
•
be adjusted each calendar year, using the Income Guidelines for King County as
provided annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) and King County's qualifying income criteria for a senior
citizen/disability property tax exemption. Any household with a disposable
income of thirty percent (30%) or less of the median household income for King
County and qualified for a subsidy prior to May 31, 2008, will be eligible for a
seventy-five percent (75%) rate subsidy. All other households with an annual
disposable income less than King County's maximum qualifying income for a
senior citizen/disability property tax exemption are eligible for a fifty percent
(50%) rate subsidy. For the calendar year 2008, those figures for a seventy-five
percent (75%) rate subsidy shall be sixteen thousand three hundred fifty dollars
• $16 350 or lessper annum for single occupancy and eighteen thousand seven
( ) g p Y g
hundred dollars ($18,700) or less per annum for double occupancy, and thirty-five
thousand dollars ($35,000) or less per annum for a fifty percent (50%) rate
subsidy. For households with more than two (2) individuals qualifying under
subsection C of this Section, an additional five thousand dollars ($5,000) is added
to the income threshold per qualifying individual.
2. Low-Income Disabled Citizen: A "low-income disabled citizen" is defined as:
a) a person qualifying for special parking privileges under RCW 46.16.381(1)(a)
through (f); b) a blind person as defined in RCW 74.18.020; c) a disabled,
handicapped, or incapacitated person as defined under any other existing State or
Federal program; or d) a person on home kidney dialysis treatment who resides in
•
3
ORDINANCE NO.
a single-family dwelling that is separately metered for water usage, either as •
owner, purchaser or renter, and whose total income, including that of his or her
spouse or co-tenant, does not exceed the annual income threshold for eligibility
for low-income rate.
3. Qualified Persons:
a. Every such person (if double occupancy, then both household members)
shall meet either of the above requirements to qualify for senior citizen and
disabled rate(s). Every such person (if double occupancy, then both household
members) shall file with the Utilities billing section of the City, his or her
affidavit, that he/she or they are qualified to be charged the special rate for
such utility services herein stated.
b. Such statement shall contain such other information as the Utilities billing •
section may prescribe, including but not limited to address, ownership or
interest in the dwelling occupied by such applicant(s), amount, source and
nature of all income from any and all sources, together with the applicant's
unqualified promise to forthwith notify the City of any circumstances or
change in condition which would make the applicant(s) ineligible to receive
said special rate(s). The Utilities billing section may establish rules and
procedures for implementing this Section.
4. Low-Income Rates:
a. For a seventy-five percent (75%) rate subsidy:
(1) For those senior citizens and disabled persons who qualified as
economically disadvantaged and were on this low-income rate prior to •
4
.i
ORDINANCE NO.
August 1, 1994, the followingrate for water service relatingto such
g
single-family dwelling in which such eligible person or persons
permanently reside is one dollar twenty cents ($1.20) per month, limited to
nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per month. Any water
consumption over nine hundred (900) cubic feet per month shall be
charged as provided in subsections A and B of this Section.
(2) For those senior citizens and disabled persons who qualify as
economically disadvantaged, and were on this low-income rate after
August 1, 1994 and prior to May 31, 2008, the following rate for water
service relating to such single-family dwelling in which such eligible
person or persons permanently reside is two dollars fifty-three cents
($2.53) per month, limited to nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per
• month. Anywater consumption over nine hundred (900) cubic feet per
p
month shall be charged as provided in subsections A and B of this Section,
except for those persons who qualify under home kidney dialysis. These
customers are limited to one thousand seven hundred (1,700) cubic feet of
water per month before any excess is charged as provided in subsections A
and B of this Section.
b. For all other senior citizens and/or disabled persons who qualify for low-
income rates according to the criteria in subsections Cl and C2 of this Section
after May 31, 2008, they will be eligible for a fifty percent (50%) subsidy on
S
5
the charges for water service relating to such single-family dwelling in which •
such eligible person or persons permanently reside. The 50% subsidy will
apply to the basic charge and commodity charge only.
5. For those senior citizens, sixty-one (61) years of age or older and/or disabled
citizens, when such seniors and/or disabled citizens are not otherwise eligible for
special rates as low-income seniors and/or disabled citizens, but who qualify for
property tax exemption pursuant to RCW 84.36.381(5)(a) and are not residents of
the City shall be exempt from the fifty percent (50%) utility surcharge applicable
to those customers not residents of the City. To receive this exemption the
applicant must provide the information required under subsection C3 of this
Section.
SECTION IV. Note 4 of subsection 8-15-5D, Additional Charges, of Chapter 5, •
Sewers, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4. Senior and/or disabled low-income rates:
a. For a seventy-five percent (75%) subsidy:
(1) Senior and/or disabled low-income citizens who qualified under RMC
8-4-31C for low-income rates prior to August 1, 1994, are eligible for a
rate of twenty-seven dollars and ninety-five cents ($27.95) per month and
a rate adjustment charge of fifty-six cents ($0.56) per month payable to
King County Wastewater, and one dollar thirty-four cents ($1.34) per
month for City sewer charges for a total of twenty-nine dollars and eighty-
five cents ($29.85).
6
ORDINANCE NO.
(2) Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualify under RMC 8-4-31 C for
•
low-income rates after August 1, 1994, and prior to May 31, 2008, are
eligible for a rate of twenty-seven dollars and ninety-five cents ($27.95)
per month and a rate adjustment charge of fifty-six cents ($0.56) per
month payable to King County Wastewater, and three dollars eighty-nine
cents ($3.89) per month for City sewer charges for a total of thirty-two
dollars and forty cents ($32.40).
b. All other senior and/or disabled citizens qualifying under RMC 8-4-31 C
for low-income rates after May 31, 2008, are eligible for a fifty percent (50%)
subsidy equal to twenty-seven dollars and ninety-five cents ($27.95) per
month and a rate adjustment charge of fifty-six cents ($0.56) per month
payable to King County Wastewater, and seven dollars seventy-eight cents
•
per month for City sewer charges for a total of thirty-six dollars and
($7.78)
twenty-nine cents ($36.29).
SECTION V. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty
(30) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008.
• Denis Law, Mayor
7
ORDINANCE NO. •
Approved as to form: •
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1449:3/24/08:scr
•
•
8