Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 10/06/2008 AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL .. e REGULAR MEETING October 6,2008 Monday, 7 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. 'PROCLAMATIONS: a. Fire Prevention Week- October 5 to 11, 2008 b. National Domestic Violence Awareness Month-October 2008 c. Disability Employment Month-October 2008 4. PUBLIC MEETING: Speakers and the public have been invited to present pro and con positions on INITIATIVE MEASURE NO. 985, concerning transportation. This measure will appear on the 11/4/2008 ballot for all Washington voters, and if passed, would open high-occupancy vehicle lanes to all traffic during specified hours,require traffic light synchronization,increase roadside assistance funding, and dedicate certain taxes, fines,tolls and other revenues to traffic-flow purposes. 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. NOTICE to all participants: pursuant to state law,RCW 4117.130, campaigning for any ballot measure or candidate from the lectern during any portion of the council meeting, and particularly, during the audience comment portion of the meeting,is PROHIBITED. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review,and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 9/22/2008. Council concur. b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 9/24/2008 for CAG-08-132, City Hall Human Resources Office Remodel; 12 bids;engineer's estimate$150,000; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Straightline Construction&Remodel,LLC,in the amount of$135,160. Council concur. c. Community and Economic Development Department recommends adoption of a revised Planned Action ordinance and amended Conceptual Plan for Sub-district 1B of the Boeing Renton Plant property,approximately 51 acres generally bounded by Logan Ave. N., Garden Ave. N.,N. 8th St., and N. 6th St. Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public hearing on 10/20/2008. d. Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of an agreement in the amount of$39,083 with TubeArt for the fabrication and installation of a "Welcome to Renton,Home of the Seattle Seahawks"sign in the vicinity of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Seahawks Way/Ripley Lane N. Refer to Community Service Committee. e. Community and Economic Development appropriate$200,000 to a newly created d Housing Opportunity Fund amendingent recommends 3 6) assst h usthe 2008 ing to projects serving low and/or moderate income households. Refer to Community Services g Committee. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) 6 f. Community Services Department recommends approval of a lease in the amount of$1,200 per month with King County Emergency Medical Services to station a paramedic unit at Fire Station #12. Refer to Finance Committee. 1601 g. Community Services Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of$97,000 with Berger/Abaco Engineers for engineering services for the Cedar River Bank Stabilization at Jones Park project. Council concur. h. Finance and Information Services Department recommends a public hearing be set on 11/3/2008 to consider 2009 Revenue Sources and Preliminary Budget, and a public hearing be set on 11/17/2008 to consider the 2009 Budget. Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public hearings on 11/3/2008 and 11/17/2008. i. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval of revisions to the Financial Management Policies for inclusion in the 2009 Preliminary Budget. Refer to Finance Committee. j. Transportation Systems Division submits CAG-06-068, South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements; and requests approval of the project, commencement of a 60-day lien period, and release of the retainage bond to Ceccanti, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. k. Transportation Systems Division submits CAG-07-134,NE 4th St./Hoquiam Ave. NE Signal Improvement; and requests approval of the project,commencement of a 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$14,730.82 to TransTech Electric, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. 1. Transportation Systems Division recommends adopting the Washington State Department of Transportation's access permitting standards for managed access highways within Renton. Council concur. (See 9. for ordinance.) m. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a utility construction agreement in the amount of$55,750 with the Washington State Department of Transportation for sewer manhole relocation for the 1-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 -Widening project. Council concur. (See 9.b. for resolution.) n. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a utility construction agreement in the amount of$292,070 with the Washington State Department of Transportation allowing for fiber optic conduit installation as part of the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 -Widening project. Council concur. (See 9.c. for resolution.) 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Interagency agreement with the Washington State Patrol to provide firefighter training program support(Council approved 9/22/2008) b. Utility construction agreement with WSDOT for 1-405 widening project sewer relocation(See 7.m.) c. Utility construction agreement with WSDOT for 1-405 widening project fiber optic conduit(See 7.n.) Ordinance for first reading: Adopting highway access management permitting standards(See 7.1.) 10. NEW BUSINESS(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 11. AUDIENCE COMMENT 12. ADJOURNMENT h✓ (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) 7th Floor Conferencing Center 6:30 p.m. Water Rights • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES.&THURS.AT 11 AM&9 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9 AM&7 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1 PM&9 PM `rri T CDf CITY OF RENTON ♦��i � Denis Law,Mayor p v-o-cia,mat--60-14, W herecw, the City of Renton is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all those living in and visiting our city; and Whereat; fire is a serious public safety concern both locally and nationally, and homes are where people are at greatest risk from fire; and . W herea.; home fires killed more than 2,500 people in the United States in 2006, according to the latest research from the nonprofit National Fire Protection Association(NFPA), and fire departments in the United States responded to nearly 400,000 home fires; and W herea4, Renton's emergency responders are dedicated to reducing the occurrence of home fires and home fire injuries through prevention and protection education; and Whereat-, Renton's residents are responsive to public education measures and are able to take personal steps to increase their safety from fire, especially in their homes; and 41410, W heea4; the 2008 Fire Prevention Week theme, "It's Fire Prevention Week—Prevent Home Fires!"effectively serves to remind us all of the simple actions we can take to stay safer from fire in our homes during Fire Prevention Week and year-round. Nov, therefore I, Denis Law, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim October 5-11, 2008,to be Fixe, Pre 'itCo-vt, Week/ in the City of Renton, and I encourage all citizens to join me in this special observance. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 6th day of October, 2008. ,IF t,4, 4.....ta4,‘ ,e147.....„ ,, Denis Law i `), [',- >4, Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington rif, 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 Y N AHE A D O F THE CURVE R V E 4 This loaner ccntains 50%recycled material.30%Dost consumer . f 0 CITY OF RENTON r: 4. ® + Denis Law, Mayor P r I1lherea4;domestic violence is a serious and widespread social problem in our nation; and I1lhereao;it has been estimated that every nine seconds a woman is beaten by her husband or boyfriend in this country and, in more than half those instances, children under the age of 12 are present; and lUheieac there were 48,102 domestic violence offenses including simple assault and violation of protection/no contact orders in Washington State in 2007; and Whe#ea4;there were thirteen deaths in King County last year due to domestic violence; and lllhereac in Renton, there were 1983 calls to 911 for domestic violence in 2007, and 458 domestic violence cases were dealt with in Renton Municipal Court; and IUheiecrj-families and communities are strengthened by holding domestic violence perpetrators accountable for their crimes; and I1lherea4;recognizing domestic violence victims is important for our communities to promote healing and empowerment; and klhei-ea-October is nationally recognized as Domestic Violence Awareness Month, and increasing public awareness and understanding of domestic violence will promote safety, health, and wellness for victims; Now, Therefore; I, Denis Law, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim the month of October 2008 to be Vat D �o 11/. 74wa,re itiontiv in the City of Renton, and encourage everyone in our community to take an active role in supporting all victims so they can lead healthy lives safe from violent and abusive behavior. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 6th day of October,ihopl rdikrI 7 \ F Denis aw \ i` n\ 1C,�I Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington • 4.. 11S 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 E r 1 O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE &(cY .0� CITY OF RENTON .Jt , 0� Denis Law, Mayor �T P r whereat; the month of October has been designated by the United States Congress as National Disability Employment Month; and Whereat; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Washington State Law against discrimination are founded upon the ideals of equal opportunity and independence for all; and Whereat; as a city we must continue to work together to help all citizens, with or without disabilities, to achieve full and independent lives, contributing to their community; and Whereat-, because an estimated one in six individuals has a disability, we, our co-workers, families, friends, and neighbors all benefit from an accessible society; and W herea4; individuals with disabilities have the right to be engaged in the economic, social, employment, cultural, and educational mainstream of American society; and Whereat; the City of Renton is interested in the welfare of, and improving the quality of life %re for, its citizens and employees with disabilities; and W herea4', among the City of Renton's many noteworthy accomplishments is the guaranteed availability of reasonable accommodation in the workplace for qualified City of Renton employees with disabilities; Now, therefare; I, Denis Law, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim October 2008 to be M.s-cthatty Erdy Mon , in the City of Renton, and I encourage everyone to join me in reaffirming our determination to achieve a society that affords independence,justice, and dignity for all. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 6th day of October, 2008. Lt/14-4, 2t/417,, • /n Denis Law �•: row Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington n , RENTON 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer Crit INITIATIVE 985 - PUBLIC MEETING October 6, 2008 The Renton City Council has set this public meeting to consider Initiative 985, solicit public comment on the Initiative, provide Renton residents with information about potential local impacts, and possibly consider a position supporting or opposing the measure. Overview. Initiative Measure No. 985 concerning transportation has been certified to the November 4, 2008 ballot. This statewide measure would open high-occupancy vehicle lanes to all traffic during specified hours, require traffic light synchronization, increase roadside assistance funding, and dedicate certain taxes, fines, tolls and other revenues to traffic-flow purposes. If approved by voters, Initiative 985 would: • Redirect state funding to a "Reduce Traffic Congestion Account" (RTCA) made up of 15 percent of the 6.5 percent state sales and use tax imposed on motor vehicle sales; 0.5 sow percent of all state transportation capital funding; certain excess toll revenues; and gross revenues generated from local traffic safety camera infractions. • Require that funding be used for opening carpool lanes to all traffic during non-peak hours; the costs of synchronizing traffic lights on heavily-traveled arterials and streets; and emergency roadside assistance. • Require the State Auditor to perform required accountability measures. After funding the above, the State must spend remaining balances on roadway capacity to reduce traffic congestion. Renton's Analysis of Potential Impacts. In 2007, Renton saw 1,225 traffic collisions and 38% of those involved injuries (472 collisions with injuries and 648 actual injuries); and 3 collisions resulting in fatalities in traffic collisions in the City. As Renton considered the photo enforcement program, the City selected the camera installation locations carefully, targeted to the most unsafe areas where the City hoped to reduce red light running and speeding. The system went live in June 2008 for red light enforcement and last month (September) for three school zones.So far in 2008, there have been 4,503 citations issued from photo enforcement. I-985 would take the money that cities generate from these red-light-camera tickets and speed zone cameras and send it to a statewide transportation fund. These camera systems are installed at busy intersections in an attempt to improve traffic safety by catching drivers who run red lights or speed in school zones; and prevent deaths and serious injuries caused by people running red lights, and encourage people to obey the speed limit in school zones to protect childrens' safety. If the Initiative is approved, Renton and 16 other cities will generate photo-radar enforcement revenues at a local level and send that money to Olympia, with no assurance it will ever be re-invested in the Renton community. The law allowing cities to install red light enforcement cameras required cities to install signs at every intersection where the cameras are located, and Renton has done so. In addition, Mayor Law has designated all proceeds from the traffic cameras to be used for neighborhood traffic enforcement. Initiative 985 would remove the local control of these programs, and fines paid by local offenders, and send all revenues for the programs to the state. The City of Renton has no other sources of funds for local traffic enforcement. Because our experience with the cameras is so new, the City made estimates of a range of potential revenue. The most conservative assumptions from 2007 suggest that Renton could collect about $870,000 for a full year of operations (assuming some violators fail to appear or pay the infraction at all; everyone asks for a hearing to be set; the fine is reduced; and some payments will be delinquent). Actual 2008 receipts are about $200,000, and the City has incurred the following costs: $110,000 paid so far to the contractor to continue the service; personnel costs for two Municipal Court staff; staffing hours in the Police Department to review violations; and installation of courtroom equipment. It is therefore likely that the City of Renton has not collected any net revenue so far in 2008. The potential impacts of Initiative 985 go beyond the City's photo enforcement program. The State Office of Financial Management estimates that over five years, approximately $622.6 million would be redirected from projects and activities supported by state and local general and transportation funds to congestion relief activities as follows: • Not charging tolls during off-peak hours on SR-167 HOT lanes would result in a 33 percent loss of funds, or a total loss of$3.1 million over five years. • Washington state transit agencies are estimated to lose about $20 million over five years in federal transit funds due to the opening of carpool lanes to general traffic during non- peak periods. While Renton did not conduct an analysis of opening up HOV lanes for all but six hours of each day, but it is possible that action could undermine the reliability of transit along corridors such as Interstate 405. Renton has an official position promoting increased Bus Rapid Transit as a transit alternative. • The Washington State Arts Commission would lose $500,000 over five years. • The state general fund would be reduced by $573.9 million over five years. The general fund is used for education, public safety, social services and general government. Given Renton's collaborative relationship across jurisdictional lines, with business community and schools, this revenue diversion could affect the state's general fund, which could have local effects on the K-12 and the community college system. Public Meeting. Speakers representing pro and con positions on the Initiative have been invited to present at this meeting, and public comment has also been invited through advertisement on Renton Channel 21 and public notice in the Renton Reporter. Following this meeting, the Council may opt to take a position, or may opt to take no action regarding the Initiative. RCW 42.17.130(1)provides that if the City Council is to take action to support or oppose a ballot measure, action may be taken at an open public meeting by members of the elected legislative body so long as the notice includes the title and number of the ballot proposition, and "members of the legislative body...or members of the public are afforded an approximately equal opportunity for the expression of an opposing view." 104.°wo g Initiative Measure No . 985 Fred JAN 142008 Reduc eConge s t i on . org ��cretari of State Reduce Traffic Congestion Initiative Complete Text AN ACT Relating to reducing traffic congestion on public highways, freeways, streets, and roads; amending RCW 46 . 61 .165, 47 . 66 . 090, 47 .56. 403, 82 . 08 . 020, 43 .17.200, 43 .46 . 090, 47 .56 . 030, 47 . 56 . 160, and 47.56 .170; reenacting and amending RCW 46 . 63 . 110; adding a new section to chapter 35.21 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 36 . 01 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 47 .01 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 82 .12 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 46. 68 RCW; creating new sections; and providing an effective date. BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: POLICIES AND PURPOSES NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. During these tough economic times, the people deserve a common sense proposal to reduce traffic congestion by implementing basic congestion relief strategies and improving Washington's transportation system with better use of existing public resources . In 2005, the voters of Washington overwhelmingly approved Initiative 900 granting the state auditor the power to conduct independent, comprehensive performance audits of state and local governments. The auditor was hired by the people to determine ways for government to deliver services as effectively and efficiently as possible. Through extensive outreach with citizens, including focus groups and town hall meetings, in 2006, the state auditor learned that eighty percent of citizens said reducing traffic congestion is their number one transportation priority. Traffic congestion incurs incredible costs to citizens, businesses and government; it is an important aspect of transportation and is an indicator of how well the state's transportation system is working. Reducing traffic we congestion means minimizing vehicle trip delays, the amount of time Electronic Transmittal 1 I-1866.1 it takes a vehicle to get from point A to point B. So the state auditor contracted with the prestigious auditing firm of Talbot, Korvola and Warwick, LLP who brought years of experience in .410 performance auditing. They hired subject-matter experts with internationally recognized experience in traffic and congestion management. Members of the audit team had more than two hundred years' of cumulative experience auditing transportation systems. In October 2007, the state auditor released the results of their independent performance audit report "Managing and Reducing Congestion. " Their number one finding was that traffic congestion relief is not a top priority of the department of transportation so the audit's fundamental recommendation was : "Commit to congestion management and reduction as a primary goal. " The anger, defensiveness, and condescending dismissal of the report by the department of transportation, the legislature, and the governor was swift and resolute. The new head of the department of transportation rejected the recommendations on the day they were released. House of representatives and senate transportation committees refused to acknowledge the report or even hold a public hearing as required under Initiative 900 . At the public hearing held by an unaffiliated legislative committee, legislators lashed out at the state auditor ,,,atio for even broaching the topic. The governor's chief of staff said citizens do not understand transportation and simply take for granted what government does . Legislators quoted from statutes that no longer existed to defend the status quo. Some promised legislative retribution on the state auditor and interference in future audits, which is illegal under Initiative 900 . The state auditor identified and retained internationally recognized experts in state, federal and international transportation issues . Their recommendations are crystal clear. This act provides voters with the opportunity to implement the strategies recommended in the report that will have an immediate impact on reducing traffic congestion using existing infrastructure and resources . Upon its approval by the voters, it is incumbent upon the department of transportation, the legislature, and the governor to listen to the people and make traffic congestion management and reduction the primary goal of transportation. As State Auditor Brian Sonntag says in his accompanying letter to the report: "Citizens have identified congestion as a priority, and therefore, so must the Department (of Transportation) and the 'kem Electronic Transmittal 2 1-1866.1 Legislature. " It is clear from the establishment's reaction to this transportation performance audit that the only way for voters to change the attitude of those in power is to approve this act. This measure would open carpool lanes during non-peak hours, require synchronization of traffic lights on heavily-traveled arterials and streets, increase funding for emergency roadside assistance, and dedicate a portion of existing vehicle-related revenue for these purposes . The intent of sections 2 and 3 of this act: We all pay taxes for our carpool lanes, so everyone should be allowed to use them at least some of the time. This act strikes a reasonable balance by allowing our carpool lanes to be open to everyone during non-peak hours, meaning midday and evenings on weekdays and all day and all night on weekends . Existing road capacity must be utilized to maximize its effectiveness. How can we increase road capacity and reduce traffic congestion on our most congested highways and roadways without spending billions of dollars? By opening our carpool lanes to everyone during non-peak hours . This will quickly, significantly, and cost-effectively relieve traffic congestion and increase traffic flow on our most congested highways and roadways and illustrate that increased road capacity results in reduced traffic congestion. These % w sections do not create or impose new tolls on carpool lanes; but if tolls or charges are imposed on carpool lanes, then these sections ensure that the toll revenue is used to reduce traffic congestion. The intent of sections 4 and 15 (1) (b) of this act: due to the voters ' approval of Initiative 960 in 2007, any tolls or charges must be decided and approved by a simple-majority vote of the Legislature, not unilaterally imposed by unelected bureaucrats on the transportation commission. Such decisions are too important and too impactful to be made by anyone other than our elected representatives . The intent of sections 5 and 6 of this act: To increase traffic flow and reduce traffic congestion, each city must synchronize the traffic signals on heavily-traveled arterials and streets within its jurisdiction. Heavily-traveled arterials and streets include routes of regional and local significance and include major and secondary arterials and streets . For heavily-traveled arterials and streets outside of a city, the county must synchronize the traffic signals . For heavily-traveled arterials and streets that are the Electronic Transmittal 3 I-1866.1 Asimommos responsibility of the state or other local government, it is the responsibility of the state or other local government to synchronize the traffic signals . What is the use of having a top-notch Medic One Nad system if it simply gets stuck in traffic? Synchronizing traffic lights ensures increased traffic flow, reduced traffic congestion, and better safety. Transferring goods to and from our ports, and other freight mobility necessities, are hampered by stop-and-go traffic at successive traffic lights. Reducing traffic congestion and increasing traffic flow is critical for freight mobility. Synchronization of traffic signals is a coordinated set of timing plans for a group of signals on arterials and streets used to facilitate smooth traffic flow. The objective of synchronizing traffic signals is to allow progression through arterials and streets with the fewest stops at intersections, while minimizing delay for the side street. Synchronizing traffic lights creates more uniform speeds along streets, increases traffic flow, reduces time delays at intersections, and creates opportunities for traffic from side streets to safely enter a main street. This act helps cities, counties, and other governments fund these improvements . The intent of section 7 of this act: Traffic accidents and other temporary obstructions greatly hinder the smooth flow of '4101, traffic and must be responded to and cleared as quickly as possible. This involves coordination, communication, equipment, and manpower. A blocked highway or roadway can result in miles of backups and long delays . A large portion of all traffic congestion is caused by collisions, disabled vehicles, spills, and other events that impede the normal flow of traffic. An initial incident has the potential for creating secondary incidents such as vehicles running out of fuel or overheating, or collisions that occur from lane changing and rapid braking in the initial incident's traffic backup. The quicker the initial incident is cleared, the less time motorists and response personnel are exposed to traffic hazards and the possibility of a secondary collision. The Washington state department of transportation and other government entities and contracted companies, including tow truck operators, must expeditiously assist in the safe, prudent, and quick removal of vehicles and other debris involved in traffic accidents or other temporary obstructions . The people want the roads cleared and drivers helped as quickly as possible to reduce traffic congestion and restore the normal flow of Electronic Transmittal 4 1-1866.1 traffic. This act provides increased funding for these programs . We need to fix what we already have using the taxes we're already paying. Taxpayers can't afford to pay for the mega-platinum option for every mega-project, especially when it's simply to satisfy the aesthetic preferences of Seattle's elite. A perfect example is the decade of debate over the Alaska Way viaduct (Highway 99) , a major north-south state highway that everyone is paying for. The people want practical, pragmatic solutions that will reduce traffic congestion, not make it worse. Government too often has a knee-jerk reaction: If their pick-up truck gets a flat tire, rather than repairing the tire, they instead replace the pick-up with a Mercedes . The people want a solution that reduces traffic congestion for the thousands of vehicles that travel over state highways every day, but at a minimum, it shouldn't be made worse. Taxpayers are already paying billions of dollars in taxes and they expect and demand improvements now, rather than promises of "less bad" decades from now. Taxpayers want transparency and accountability with the focus on solving the problem rather than using the problem to leverage the public to swallow yet another tax increase. It is way past time for the people to get something in return for the taxes they're already paying. The intent of sections 8 and 9 of this act: In order to reduce traffic congestion, it is essential that existing vehicle taxes be spent on this critical priority. Vehicle purchases generate approximately $850 million per year in state tax revenue and using 15% of those revenues to reduce traffic congestion is reasonable and prudent. People who purchase vehicles want their taxes to go toward reducing traffic congestion on our roads, streets, and highways at the state and local level . The intent of section 11 of this act: To provide additional revenue for the policy requirements of this act, moneys collected from fines and civil penalties from red light traffic cameras shall be used to reduce traffic congestion and increase traffic flow. The intent of sections 12 through 14 of this act: To provide additional revenue for the policy requirements of this act, any transportation-related public works project shall not be required to spend a percentage of its funds on purchases of art, instead a percentage will be dedicated to reducing traffic congestion. Taxpayers don' t have bottomless wallets so every dollar possible must ow Electronic Transmittal 5 I-1866.1 go toward the people's top priority: reducing traffic congestion. The intent of sections 15 through 17 of this act: These sections do not create or impose new tolls; but if tolls or charges NIS are imposed, then these sections ensure taxpayers are protected. There has been talk of simply charging people extra just to drive on existing highways, freeways, roads, and streets, including adding global positioning system (GPS) devices or transponders to vehicles or other methods to collect revenue. If citizens are double-taxed, then any tolls or charges will be used to reduce traffic congestion. Year after year, Washington voters have repeatedly rejected the business-as-usual, the-only-solution-is-a-tax-increase mentality. During these tough economic times, the people deserve a common sense proposal to reduce traffic congestion and increase traffic flow by implementing basic traffic congestion relief strategies and improving Washington' s transportation system with better use of existing public resources . Reduced traffic congestion ensures a growing, thriving economy that is essential in generating the tax revenue necessary to fund government services. This measure will make travel times faster immediately on our highways and roadways, reduce traffic congestion, increase traffic '400 flow, increase safety and freight mobility, and result in fewer vehicles idling thus decreasing carbon emissions, all by maximizing the use of existing public resources . OPENS CARPOOL LANES TO EVERYONE DURING NON-PEAR HOURS Sec. 2. RCW 46 . 61 .165 and 1999 c 206 s 1 are each amended to read as follows: The state department of transportation and the local authorities are authorized, subject to the requirements in this section, to reserve all or any portion of any highway under their respective jurisdictions as carpool lanes, including any designated lane or ramp, for the exclusive or preferential use of public transportation vehicles or private motor vehicles carrying no fewer than a specified number of passengers when ( (ouch) ) the limitation will increase the efficient utilization of the highway or will aid in the conservation of energy resources . Regulations authorizing ( (such) ) exclusive or preferential use of a highway facility ( (may bc dcclarcd to bc) ) are `rr Electronic Transmittal 6 I-1866.1 effective ( (at all timcs or) ) only at the specified times of day ( (e ) ) and on the specified days designated in this section. In order to reduce traffic congestion, existing road capacity must be utilized to maximize its effectiveness . On and after December 4, 2008, all carpool lanes shall be opened during non-peak hours for use by all traffic otherwise lawfully abiding by the rules of the road of this state, including RCW 46 . 61.100 . This policy shall be in effect for any carpool lane in effect on January 1, 2008, and for any new or expanded carpool lanes designated after January 1, 2008, on any highway, freeway, or roadway in the state. Electronic and nonelectronic signage must be substantially updated and expanded to ensure that drivers are fully alerted to the policies required under this section. For the purposes of this section: (1) "Carpool lanes" are high-occupancy vehicle lanes, including express lanes, lanes like those established under RCW 47 .56 .403, off- ramp bypass lanes, and on-ramp bypass lanes on any highway, freeway, or roadway in the state. (2) "Non-peak hours" mean midday on weekdays, evenings on weekdays, and all day and all night on weekends . fir.► (a) "Midday on weekdays" is between the hours of 9 :00 a.m. and 3 : 00 p.m. on Monday through Friday; (b) "Evenings on weekdays" are between the hours of 6 : 00 p.m. and 6 : 00 a.m. on Monday through Thursday; (c) "All day and all night on weekends" is between the hours of 6 : 00 p.m. on Friday and 6 :00 a.m. on Monday; (d) "Peak hours" are between the hours of 6 : 00 a.m. and 9 : 00 a.m. and 3 :00 p.m. and 6: 00 p.m. on Monday through Friday. (3) During hours not specified as non-peak hours under this section, the use of carpool lanes by a motor vehicle is limited to those carrying two or more persons, except in the case of a motorcycle, which may use a carpool lane if carrying one or more persons . (4) A governmental entity, authority, or agency shall not avoid the requirements of this section by redesignating a carpool lane as another name or designation. (5) To reduce traffic congestion by encouraging traffic to use carpool lanes during 'non-peak hours, a toll may not be charged on any vehicle in a high-occupancy toll lane under RCW 47 . 56 .403 during non- Electronic Transmittal 7 I-1866.1 peak hours, and any tolls or charges imposed and collected for such lanes during peak hours which exceeds the costs identified in section 3 of this act must be deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. This section does not restrict the operation of RCW 46 .44.080, 46. 61 .100, or 46 . 61.135, thus continuing restricted truck usage of city streets . Violation of a restriction of highway usage prescribed by the appropriate authority under this section is a traffic infraction. Sec. 3. RCW 47 . 66. 090 and 2005 c 312 s 4 are each amended to read as follows: The high-occupancy toll lanes operations account is created in the state treasury. The department shall deposit ( (all) ) only those revenues received by the department as toll charges collected from high-occupancy toll lane users that are necessary to cover the costs of construction and operation of the toll lanes . Moneys in this account may be spent only if appropriated by the legislature. ( (Moneys in this account may be tried ter, but be not limited to, debt service, planning, administration, construction, maintenance, operation, repair, rebuilding, e rferecment, and- expansion of high NIS - = = - - o o ' - -rcasc transit, vanpool and carpool, vanpool, carpool, and trip red-tion services in the corridor. A to increase transit, vanpool, earpeo-1, and- trip- reduction services in the corridor. ) ) All toll charge revenues exceeding these costs shall be dedicated to reducing traffic congestion and be deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. Sec. 4. RCW 47 . 56 .403 and 2005 c 312 s 3 are each amended to read as follows: (1) The department may provide, subject to the requirements of RCW 46 . 61 . 165, 47 . 66 . 090, and any other applicable law, for the establishment, construction, and operation of a pilot project of high-occupancy toll lanes on state route 167 high-occupancy vehicle lanes within King county. The department may issue, buy, and redeem bonds, and deposit and expend them; secure and remit financial and NIS Electronic Transmittal 8 I-1866.1 other assistance in the construction of high-occupancy toll lanes, carry insurance, and handle any other matters pertaining to the high- occupancy toll lane pilot project. (2) Tolls for high-occupancy toll lanes will be established as follows : (a) The schedule of toll charges for high-occupancy toll lanes must be established by the transportation commission and collected in a manner determined by the commission. (b) Toll charges shall not be assessed on transit buses and vanpool vehicles owned or operated by any public agency. (c) The department shall establish performance standards for the state route 167 high-occupancy toll lane pilot project. The department must automatically adjust the toll charge, using dynamic tolling, to ensure that toll-paying single-occupant vehicle users are only permitted to enter the lane to the extent that average vehicle speeds in the lane remain above forty-five miles per hour at least ninety percent of the time during peak hours as defined in RCW 46 . 61 .165. The toll charge may vary in amount by time of day, level of traffic congestion within the highway facility, vehicle occupancy, or other criteria, as the commission may deem appropriate. The commission may also vary toll charges for single-occupant inherently Noire low-emission vehicles such as those powered by electric batteries, natural gas, propane, or other clean burning fuels . (d) The commission shall periodically review the toll charges to determine if the toll charges are effectively maintaining travel time, speed, and reliability on the highway facilities . (3) The department shall monitor the state route 167 high- occupancy toll lane pilot project and shall annually report to the transportation commission and the legislature on operations and findings . At a minimum, the department shall provide facility use data and review the impacts on: (a) Freeway efficiency and safety; (b) Effectiveness for transit; (c) Person and vehicle movements by mode; (d) Ability to finance improvements and transportation services through tolls; and (e) The impacts on all highway users . The department shall analyze aggregate use data and conduct, as needed, separate surveys to assess usage of the facility in relation to geographic, Electronic Transmittal 9 I-1866.1 socioeconomic, and demographic information within the corridor in order to ascertain actual and perceived questions of equitable use of the facility. (4) The department shall modify the pilot project to address identified safety issues and mitigate negative impacts to high- occupancy vehicle lane users . (5) Authorization to impose high-occupancy vehicle tolls for the state route 167 high-occupancy toll pilot project expires if either of the following two conditions apply: (a) If no contracts have been let by the department to begin construction of the toll facilities associated with this pilot project within four years of July 24, 2005; or (b) Four years after toll collection begins under this section. (6) The department of transportation shall adopt rules that allow automatic vehicle identification transponders used for electronic toll collection to be compatible with other electronic payment devices or transponders from the Washington state ferry system, other public transportation systems, or other toll collection systems to the extent that technology permits . (7) The conversion of a single existing high-occupancy vehicle lane to a high-occupancy toll lane as proposed for SR-167 must be vai0 taken as the exception for this pilot project. (8) A violation of the lane restrictions applicable to the high-occupancy toll lanes established under this section is a traffic infraction. (9) Procurement activity associated with this pilot project shall be open and competitive in accordance with chapter 39 .29 RCW. REQUIRES SYNCHRONIZATION OF TRAFFIC LIGHTS ON HEAVILY-TRAVELED ARTERIALS AND STREETS NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. A new section is added to chapter 35.21 RCW to read as follows : (1) To reduce traffic congestion and increase traffic flow, each city must synchronize the traffic lights on heavily-traveled arterials and streets within its jurisdiction to optimize traffic flow. Heavily-traveled arterials and streets include routes of regional and local significance and include major and secondary arterials as defined in RCW 35.78 . 010 . For heavily-traveled ' ' Electronic Transmittal 10 I-1866.1 arterials and streets outside of a city, the county must synchronize the traffic lights to optimize traffic flow. For heavily-traveled arterials and streets that are the responsibility of the state or other local government, the state or other local government must synchronize the arterials' and streets' traffic lights to optimize traffic flow. Cities, counties, and other governments must cooperate and coordinate their efforts in implementing this traffic light synchronization mandate. Funding shall be allocated from the dedicated revenue in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act to assist efforts after January 1, 2008 by cities, counties, and other governments to synchronize traffic lights to optimize traffic flow and reduce traffic congestion. (2) The state auditor shall identify and establish performance benchmarks using best practices for traffic light synchronization to optimize traffic flow under this section. The state auditor shall investigate and track local governments ' progress on these benchmarks and shall provide information on such progress and other relevant information to the public on a regular basis. NEW SECTION. Sec. 6. A new section is added to chapter 36. 01 RCW to read as follows: (1) To reduce traffic congestion and increase traffic flow, each county must synchronize the traffic lights on heavily-traveled arterials and streets within its jurisdiction to optimize traffic flow. Heavily-traveled arterials and streets include routes of regional and local significance and include major and secondary arterials as defined in RCW 35 .78 . 010. For heavily-traveled arterials and streets in an incorporated city or town, the city or town must synchronize the traffic lights to optimize traffic flow. For heavily-traveled arterials and streets that are the responsibility of the state or other government entity, the state or other government entity must synchronize the traffic lights to optimize traffic flow. Cities, counties, and other governments must cooperate and coordinate their efforts in implementing this traffic light synchronization mandate. Funding shall be allocated from the dedicated revenue in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act to assist efforts after January 1, 2008 by cities, counties, and other local governments to synchronize traffic lights to optimize traffic flow and reduce traffic congestion. Electronic Transmittal 11 1-1866.1 (2) The state auditor shall identify and establish performance benchmarks using best practices for traffic light synchronization to optimize traffic flow under this section. The state auditor shall `.r0 investigate and track local governments' progress on these benchmarks and shall provide information on such progress and other relevant information to the public on a regular basis . INCREASES FUNDING FOR EMERGENCY ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE NEW SECTION. Sec. 7. A new section is added to chapter 47 . 01 RCW to read as follows : (1) To reduce traffic congestion and increase traffic flow, the department of transportation and other governmental entities must rapidly respond to traffic accidents and other . obstructions on highways, freeways, roads, and streets, and clear these accidents and obstructions as expeditiously as possible. The department and other governmental entities must receive increased funding for emergency roadside assistance from the dedicated revenue in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Relief Account created in section 10 of this act. To maximize flexibility and response times, the state, the department, and other governmental entities may and are encouraged to contract "INO out emergency roadside assistance services to private companies, including tow truck operators. (2) The state auditor shall identify and establish performance benchmarks using best practices for emergency roadside assistance under this section and shall investigate and track progress fulfilling this requirement, providing this and other relevant information to the public on a regular basis . DEDICATES A PORTION OF EXISTING VEHICLE-RELATED REVENUE TO HELP FUND THE OPENING OF CARPOOL LANES TO EVERYONE DURING NON-PEAR HOURS, HELP FUND THE SYNCHRONIZATION OF TRAFFIC LIGHTS ON HEAVILY-TRAVELED ARTERIALS AND STREETS, AND INCREASE FUNDING FOR EMERGENCY ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE Sec. 8. RCW 82 . 08 . 020 and 2006 c 1 s 3 are each amended to read as follows : (1) There is levied and there shall be collected a tax on each retail sale in this state equal to six and five-tenths percent of the Electronic Transmittal 12 I-1866.1 selling price. (2) There is levied and there shall be collected an additional tax on each retail car rental, regardless of whether the vehicle is err.► licensed in this state, equal to five and nine-tenths percent of the selling price. The revenue collected under this subsection shall be deposited in the multimodal transportation account created in RCW 47 . 66 .070 . (3) Beginning July 1, 2003, there is levied and collected an additional tax of three-tenths of one percent of the selling price on each retail sale of a motor vehicle in this state, other than retail car rentals taxed under subsection (2) of this section. The revenue collected under this subsection shall be deposited in the multimodal transportation account created in RCW 47 . 66 .070. (4) For purposes of subsections (3) and (8) of this section, "motor vehicle" has the meaning provided in RCW 46 .04 .320, but does not include farm tractors or farm vehicles as defined in RCW 46 . 04 .180 and 46 . 04 .181, off-road and nonhighway vehicles as defined in RCW 46 . 09 . 020, and snowmobiles as defined in RCW 46 . 10 .010 . (5) Beginning on December 8, 2005, 0 .16 percent of the taxes collected under subsection (1) of this section shall be dedicated to funding comprehensive performance audits required under RCW Nape 43 . 09 .470. The revenue identified in this subsection shall be deposited in the performance audits of government account created in RCW 43 . 09 .475 . (6) The taxes imposed under this chapter shall apply to successive retail sales of the same property. (7) The rates provided in this section apply to taxes imposed under chapter 82 . 12 RCW as provided in RCW 82 .12 . 020 . (8) To effectively utilize existing resources to reduce traffic congestion, beginning on December 4, 2008, fifteen percent of the taxes collected under subsection (1) of this section on the retail sale of those vehicles taxed under subsection (3) of this section shall be dedicated to reducing traffic congestion and deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. This subsection (8) of this section dedicates a portion of existing vehicle sales tax revenue and does not raise taxes . NEW SECTION. Sec. 9. A new section is added to chapter 82 .12 RCW to read as follows : Electronic Transmittal 13 I-1866.1 Beginning on December 4, 2008, fifteen percent of the taxes collected under RCW 82 . 12 . 020 on vehicles taxed under RCW 82 . 08 . 020 (3) based on the rate in RCW 82 . 08 . 020 (1) shall be dedicated to reducing traffic congestion and deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. CREATES "REDUCE TRAFFIC CONGESTION ACCOUNT" NEW SECTION. Sec. 10. A new section is added to chapter 46.68 RCW to read as follows: (1) The Reduce Traffic Congestion Account is hereby created in the state treasury as a subaccount of the motor vehicle fund. All receipts from: The fifteen percent of sales and use taxes dedicated in RCW 82 . 08 . 020 (8) and section 9 of this act; any tolls or charges collected under RCW 46 . 61 .165 (5) and 47 . 66 . 090; revenue from infractions dedicated to reducing traffic congestion under RCW 43 . 63 .110; appropriate allocated funds under section 13 of this act; and any tolls or charges collected under RCW 47 .56 . 030 and 47.56.170 must be deposited in the subaccount. Moneys in the subaccount may be spent only after appropriation. Expenditures from the subaccount may be used only: (a) To pay for costs associated with the opening of carpool lanes to everyone during non-peak hours as required under RCW 46 . 61 . 165, including new and modified electronic and nonelectronic signage; lane striping, improvements, and maintenance; and shoulder maintenance and improvements, including bumpers; (b) To pay for costs associated with synchronizing traffic lights on heavily-traveled arterials and streets as required under sections 5 and 6 of this act; (c) To provide increased funding for emergency roadside assistance as required under section 7 of this act; and (d) To provide funding for the activities of the state auditor required under this section and sections 5, 6, and 7 of this act. (2) After payment of costs identified in subsections (1) (a) through (d) of this section, any other purpose which reduces traffic congestion by reducing vehicle delay times by expanding road capacity and general purpose use to improve traffic flow for all vehicles may be provided funding from the subaccount. Purposes to improve traffic flow for all vehicles do not include creating, maintaining, or Electronic Transmittal 14 1-1866.1 operating bike paths or lanes, wildlife crossings, landscaping, park and ride lots, ferries, trolleys, buses, monorail, light rail, or *lbw heavy rail . (3) Revenue deposited in the subaccount and not appropriated shall be retained by this subaccount . (4) To measure the level of compliance with the policies, purposes, and intent of this act, the state auditor shall investigate and track the revenues and expenditures required under this act and shall report this and other relevant information to the public on a regular basis. DEDICATES REVENUE FROM RED LIGHT TRAFFIC CAMERAS TO THE "REDUCE TRAFFIC CONGESTION ACCOUNT" Sec. 11. RCW 46 . 63 .110 and 2007 c 356 s 8 and 2007 c 199 s 28 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows : (1) A person found to have committed a traffic infraction shall be assessed a monetary penalty. No penalty may exceed two hundred and fifty dollars for each offense unless authorized by this chapter or title. (2) The monetary penalty for a violation of (a) RCW 46 .55 .105 (2) is two hundred fifty dollars for each offense; (b) RCW 46 . 61 .210 (1) is five hundred dollars for each offense. No penalty assessed under this subsection (2) may be reduced. (3) The supreme court shall prescribe by rule a schedule of monetary penalties for designated traffic infractions. This rule shall also specify the conditions under which local courts may exercise discretion in assessing fines and penalties for traffic infractions . The legislature respectfully requests the supreme court to adjust this schedule every two years for inflation. (4) There shall be a penalty of twenty-five dollars for failure to respond to a notice of traffic infraction except where the infraction relates to parking as defined by local law, ordinance, regulation, or resolution or failure to pay a monetary penalty imposed pursuant to this chapter. A local legislative body may set a monetary penalty not to exceed twenty-five dollars for failure to respond to a notice of traffic infraction relating to parking as defined by local law, ordinance, regulation, or resolution. The Now Electronic Transmittal 15 I-1866.1 local court, whether a municipal, police, or district court, shall impose the monetary penalty set by the local legislative body. (5) Monetary penalties provided for in chapter 46 .70 RCW which are civil in nature and penalties which may be assessed for violations of chapter 46 . 44 RCW relating to size, weight, and load of motor vehicles are not subject to the limitation on the amount of monetary penalties which may be imposed pursuant to this chapter. (6) Whenever a monetary penalty, fee, cost, assessment, or other monetary obligation is imposed by a court under this chapter it is immediately payable. If the court determines, in its discretion, that a person is not able to pay a monetary obligation in full, and not more than one year has passed since the later of July 1, 2005, or the date the monetary obligation initially became due and payable, the court shall enter into a payment plan with the person, unless the person has previously been granted a payment plan with respect to the same monetary obligation, or unless the person is in noncompliance of any existing or prior payment plan, in which case the court may, at its discretion, implement a payment plan. If the court has notified the department that the person has failed to pay or comply and the person has subsequently entered into a payment plan and made an initial payment, the court shall notify the department that the NIS infraction has been adjudicated, and the department shall rescind any suspension of the person' s driver's license or driver's privilege based on failure to respond to that infraction. "Payment plan, " as used in this section, means a plan that requires reasonable payments based on the financial ability of the person to pay. The person may voluntarily pay an amount at any time in addition to the payments required under the payment plan. (a) If a payment required to be made under the payment plan is delinquent or the person fails to complete a community restitution program on or before the time established under the payment plan, unless the court determines good cause therefor and adjusts the payment plan or the community restitution plan accordingly, the court shall notify the department of the person's failure to meet the conditions of the plan, and the department shall suspend the person' s driver's license or driving privilege until all monetary obligations, including those imposed under subsections (3) and (4) of this section, have been paid, and court authorized community restitution has been completed, or until the department has been notified that *140 Electronic Transmittal 16 1-1866.1 the court has entered into a new time payment or community restitution agreement with the person. (b) If a person has not entered into a payment plan with the court and has not paid the monetary obligation in full on or before the time established for payment, the court shall notify the department of the delinquency. The department shall suspend the person's driver' s license or driving privilege until all monetary obligations have been paid, including those imposed under subsections (3) and (4) of this section, or until the person has entered into a payment plan under this section. (c) If the payment plan is to be administered by the court, the court may assess the person a reasonable administrative fee to be wholly retained by the city or county with jurisdiction. The administrative fee shall not exceed ten dollars per infraction or twenty-five dollars per payment plan, whichever is less . (d) Nothing in this section precludes a court from contracting with outside entities to administer its payment plan system. When outside entities are used for the administration of a payment plan, the court may assess the person a reasonable fee for such administrative services, which fee may be calculated on a periodic, percentage, or other basis. (e) If a court authorized community restitution program for offenders is available in the jurisdiction, the court may allow conversion of all or part of the monetary obligations due under this section to court authorized community restitution in lieu of time payments if the person is unable to make reasonable time payments. (7) In addition to any other penalties imposed under this section and not subject to the limitation of subsection (1) of this section, a person found to have committed a traffic infraction shall be assessed: (a) A fee of five dollars per infraction. Under no circumstances shall this fee be reduced or waived. Revenue from this fee shall be forwarded to the state treasurer for deposit in the emergency medical services and trauma care system trust account under RCW 70. 168 . 040; (b) A fee of ten dollars per infraction. Under no circumstances shall this fee be reduced or waived. Revenue from this fee shall be forwarded to the state treasurer for deposit in the Washington auto theft prevention authority account; and Now Electronic Transmittal 17 I-1866.1 (c) A fee of two dollars per infraction. Revenue from this fee shall be forwarded to the state treasurer for deposit in the traumatic brain injury account established in RCW 74 .31. 060 . (8) (a) In addition to any other penalties imposed under this section and not subject to the limitation of subsection (1) of this section, a person found to have committed a traffic infraction other than of RCW 46. 61. 527 shall be assessed an additional penalty of twenty dollars. The court may not reduce, waive, or suspend the additional penalty unless the court finds the offender to be indigent. If a court authorized community restitution program for offenders is available in the jurisdiction, the court shall allow offenders to offset all or a part of the penalty due under this subsection (8) by participation in the court authorized community restitution program. (b) Eight dollars and fifty cents of the additional penalty under (a) of this subsection shall be remitted to the state treasurer. The remaining revenue from the additional penalty must be remitted under chapters 2 .08, 3 .46, 3 . 50, 3 . 62, 10. 82, and 35.20 RCW. Money remitted under this subsection to the state treasurer must be deposited as provided in RCW 43 .08 .250 . The balance of the revenue received by the county or city treasurer under this subsection must be deposited into the county or city current expense fund. Revenue to be deposited into the county or city current expense fund from infractions issued under RCW 46 .63 . 170 shall instead be dedicated to reducing traffic congestion and be deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. Moneys retained by the city or county under this subsection shall constitute reimbursement for any liabilities under RCW 43 . 135. 060. (9) If a legal proceeding, such as garnishment, has commenced to collect any delinquent amount owed by the person for any penalty imposed by the court under this section, the court may, at its discretion, enter into a payment plan. (10) The monetary penalty for violating RCW 46 .37 . 395 is: (a) Two hundred fifty dollars for the first violation; (b) five hundred dollars for the second violation; and (c) seven hundred fifty dollars for each violation thereafter. DEDICATES REVENUE PREVIOUSLY ALLOCATED TO ART TO THE "REDUCE TRAFFIC CONGESTION ACCOUNT" Nosif Electronic Transmittal 18 I-1866.1 NEW SECTION. Sec. 12. RCW 43 . 17 .200 and 2005 c 36 s 4 are each amended to read as follows: Nikw All state agencies including all state departments, boards, councils, commissions, and quasi public corporations shall allocate, as a nondeductible item, out of any moneys appropriated for the original construction of any public building, except for appropriations after December 4, 2008 for transportation-related public works projects, an amount of one-half of one percent of the appropriation to be expended by the Washington state arts commission for the acquisition of works of art. The works of art may be placed on public lands, integral to or attached to a public building or structure, detached within or outside a public building or structure, part of a portable exhibition or collection, part of a temporary exhibition, or loaned or exhibited in other public facilities. In addition to the cost of the works of art, the one-half of one percent of the appropriation as provided herein shall be used to provide for the administration of the visual arts program, including conservation of the state art collection, by the Washington state arts commission and all costs for installation of the works of art. For the purpose of this section, building shall not include highway construction sheds, warehouses or other buildings of a temporary nature. NEW SECTION. Sec. 13. To provide additional funds for reducing traffic congestion, all state agencies, including all state departments, boards, councils, commissions, and quasi public corporations shall allocate, as a nondeductible item, out of any moneys appropriated after December 4, 2008 for any transportation- related public works project, an amount of one-half of one percent of the appropriation to be dedicated to reducing traffic congestion and be deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. The people find that their top priority is reducing traffic congestion. Sec. 14. RCW 43 .46 . 090 and 1983 c 204 s 1 are each amended to read as follows: The legislature recognizes this state's responsibility to foster culture and the arts and its interest in the viable development of her artists and craftsmen by the establishment of the Washington Electronic Transmittal 19 1-1866.1 state arts commission. The legislature declares it to be a policy of this state that a portion of appropriations for capital expenditures, except as provided in RCW 43 .17 .200 and section 13 of this act, be set aside for the acquisition of works of art to be placed in public buildings or lands . There is hereby established a visual arts program to be administered by the Washington state arts commission. CRITICAL TAXPAYER PROTECTION: PREVENTS POLITICIANS FROM DIVERTING TOLL REVENUE TO THE GENERAL FUND; TOLLS ON A PROJECT GET SPENT ON THE PROJECT Sec. 15. RCW 47 . 56 . 030 and 2002 c 114 s 19 are each amended to read as follows: (1) Except as permitted under chapter 47 .46 RCW: (a) The department of transportation shall have full charge of the construction of all toll bridges and other toll facilities including the Washington state ferries, and the operation and maintenance thereof. (b) The transportation commission shall determine and establish the tolls and charges thereon, subject to all applicable laws, and shall perform all duties and exercise all powers relating to the tom financing, refinancing, and fiscal management of all toll bridges and other toll facilities including the Washington state ferries, and bonded indebtedness in the manner provided by law. Except for Washington state ferries toll facilities, revenue from any new tolls or charges established after December 4, 2008, that exceed the cost of construction, operation, or maintenance of toll facilities and new capital improvements to highways, freeways, roads, bridges, and streets, shall be dedicated to reducing traffic congestion and deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. Except for Washington state ferries toll facilities, in the absence of any capital improvements, revenue from any new tolls or charges established after December 4, 2008, that exceed the cost of collecting the tolls or charges shall be dedicated to reducing traffic congestion and deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. (c) The department shall have full charge of design of all toll facilities . (d) Except as provided in this section, the department shall °4•Ni Electronic Transmittal 20 I-1866.1 proceed with the construction of such toll bridges and other facilities and the approaches thereto by contract in the manner of state highway construction immediately upon there being made available funds for such work and shall prosecute such work to completion as rapidly as practicable. The department is authorized to negotiate contracts for any amount without bid under (d) (i) and (ii) of this subsection: (i) Emergency contracts, in order to make repairs to ferries or ferry terminal facilities or removal of such facilities whenever continued use of ferries or ferry terminal facilities constitutes a real or immediate danger to the traveling public or precludes prudent use of such ferries or facilities; and (ii) Single source contracts for vessel dry dockings, when there is clearly and legitimately only one available bidder to conduct dry dock-related work for a specific class or classes of vessels . The contracts may be entered into for a single vessel dry docking or for multiple vessel dry dockings for a period not to exceed two years. (2) The department shall proceed with the procurement of materials, supplies, services, and equipment needed for the support, maintenance, and use of a ferry, ferry terminal, or other facility operated by Washington state ferries, in accordance with chapter 43 . 19 RCW except as follows : (a) Except as provided in (d) of this subsection, when the secretary of the department of transportation determines in writing that the use of invitation for bid is either not practicable or not advantageous to the state and it may be necessary to make competitive evaluations, including technical or performance evaluations among acceptable proposals to complete the contract award, a contract may be entered into by use of a competitive sealed proposals method, and a formal request for proposals solicitation. Such formal request for proposals solicitation shall include a functional description of the needs and requirements of the state and the significant factors. (b) When purchases are made through a formal request for proposals solicitation the contract shall be awarded to the responsible proposer whose competitive sealed proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the state taking into consideration price and other evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposals . No significant factors may be used in evaluating a proposal that are not specified in the request for lare Electronic Transmittal 21 1-1866.1 proposals. Factors that may be considered in evaluating proposals include but are not limited to: Price; maintainability; reliability; commonality; performance levels; life cycle cost if applicable under 41400 this section; cost of transportation or delivery; delivery schedule offered; installation cost; cost of spare parts; availability of parts and service offered; and the following: (i) The ability, capacity, and skill of the proposer to perform the contract or provide the service required; (ii) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience, and efficiency of the proposer; (iii) Whether the proposer can perform the contract within the time specified; (iv) The quality of performance of previous contracts or services; (v) The previous and existing compliance by the proposer with laws relating to the contract or services; (vi) Objective, measurable criteria defined in the request for proposal. These criteria may include but are not limited to items such as discounts, delivery costs, maintenance services costs, installation costs, and transportation costs; and (vii) Such other information as may be secured having a bearing `air on the decision to award the contract. (c) When purchases are made through a request for proposal process, proposals received shall be evaluated based on the evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposal. When issuing a request for proposal for the procurement of propulsion equipment or systems that include an engine, the request for proposal must specify the use of a life cycle cost analysis that includes an evaluation of fuel efficiency. When a life cycle cost analysis is used, the life cycle cost of a proposal shall be given at least the same relative importance as the initial price element specified in the request of proposal documents . The department may reject any and all proposals received. If the proposals are not rejected, the award shall be made to the proposer whose proposal is most advantageous to the department, considering price and the other evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposal . (d) If the department is procuring large equipment or systems (e.g. , electrical, propulsion) needed for the support, maintenance, and use of a ferry operated by Washington state ferries, the +� Electronic Transmittal 22 1-1866.1 department shall proceed with a formal request for proposal solicitation under this subsection (2) without a determination of necessity by the secretary. Sec. 16. RCW 47 . 56 .160 and 1984 c 7 s 258 are each amended to read as follows : Except for revenues to be deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account under RCW 47 .56 . 030 (1) (b) , ( (A) )all tolls or other revenues received from the operation of any toll bridge or toll bridges constructed with the proceeds of bonds issued and sold hereunder shall be paid over by the department to the state treasurer. The treasurer shall deposit them forthwith as demand deposits in a depository or depositories authorized by law to receive deposits of state funds. The deposit shall be made to the credit of a special trust fund designated as the toll revenue fund of the particular toll bridge or toll bridges producing the tolls or revenue, which fund shall be a trust fund and shall at all times be kept segregated and set apart from all other funds . Sec. 17. RCW 47 . 56 . 170 and 1984 c 7, s 259 are each amended to rrre read as follows : From the money deposited in each separate construction fund under RCW 47 . 56 . 160, the state treasurer shall transfer to the place or places of payment named in the bonds such sums as may be required to pay the interest as it becomes due on all bonds sold and outstanding for the construction of a particular toll bridge or toll bridges during the period of actual construction and during the period of six months immediately thereafter. The state treasurer shall thereafter transfer from each separate toll revenue fund to the place or places of payment named in the bonds such sums as may be required to pay the interest on the bonds and redeem the principal thereof as the interest payments and bond redemption become due for all bonds issued and sold for the construction of the particular toll bridge or toll bridges producing the tolls or revenues so deposited in the toll revenue fund. All funds so transferred for the payment of principal or interest on bonds issued for any particular toll bridge shall be segregated and applied solely for the payment of that principal or interest. The proceedings authorizing the issuance of bonds may wr provide for setting up a reserve fund or funds out of the tolls and Electronic Transmittal 23 1-1866.1 other revenues not needed for the payment of principal and interest, as the same currently matures and for the preservation and continuance of the fund in a manner to be provided therein. The ' proceedings may also require the immediate application of all surplus moneys in the toll revenue fund to the retirement of the bonds prior to maturity, by call or purchase, in such manner and upon such terms and the payment of such premiums as may be deemed advisable in the judgment of the department. The moneys remaining in each separate toll revenue fund after providing the amount required for interest and redemption of bonds as provided in this section shall be held and applied as provided in the proceedings authorizing the issuance of the bonds. If the proceedings authorizing the issuance of the bonds do not require surplus revenues to be held or applied in any particular manner, they shall be ( (- = -- -_ - -= - _ - • - - o - - _ . co - - - o - - . the conotruction, operatiea, and maintenance e-f the toll bridge or bridges ao the department may determine) ) dedicated to reducing traffic congestion and deposited in the Reduce Traffic Congestion Account created in section 10 of this act. Now NEW SECTION. Sec. 18. This act does not inhibit or prohibit the department of transportation or any other state or local government agency or body from allocating or expending other revenue from other sources to fund costs associated with opening carpool lanes to everyone during non-peak hours, synchronizing traffic lights on heavily-traveled arterials and streets, or increasing funding for emergency roadside assistance as required under this act. NEW SECTION. Sec. 19. The provisions of this act are to be liberally construed to effectuate the intent, policies, and purposes of this act. NEW SECTION. Sec. 20. Subheadings used in this act are not any part of the law. NEW SECTION. Sec. 21. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected. 4110 Electronic Transmittal 24 1-1866.1 NEW SECTION. Sec. 22. This act shall be known and cited as the NomeReduce Traffic Congestion Act of 2008. NEW SECTION. Sec. 23. This act takes effect December 4, 2008 . --- END --- err Ir✓ Electronic Transmittal 25 I-1866.1 K• CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: (� Submitting Data: For Agenda of: cl Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk October 6, 2008 Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Bid opening on September 24, 2008, for CAG-08-132, Correspondence.. City Hall Human Resources Remodel Project Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Staff Recommendation Study Sessions Bid Tabulation Sheet (twelve bids) Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $135,160 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $500,000 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: 11100' Engineer's Estimate: $150,000 In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Straightline Construction &Remodel, LLC in the amount of$135,160. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Straightline Construction & Remodel, LLC in the amount of $135,160. Y CITY OF RENTON SEP 2 9 2008 �Y O RECEIVED skiveC� „ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPAIe ' "PFFiCE 11NMEMORANDUM DATE: September 29, 2008 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: Michael Nolan, Facilities Coordinator SUBJECT: Award of Bid, City Hall H.R. Remodel We would like to submit the results of the following project bid for Council's review and approval: • For Council Date: October 6, 2008 • Project Name: City Hall H.R. Remodel, CAG 08-132 • Project Summary: This project involves remodeling the first floor of City Hall to convert the area formerly occupied by the Finance Department into a suite for the Human Resources Department. oirsioo • Bid Opening Date: September 24, 2008 • Number of Bidders: Twelve (12) • Apparent Low Bidder: Straightline Construction & Remodeling, LLC • Apparent Low Bid: $135,160.00 • Engineer's Estimate: $150,000.00 • Project Budget: This project is part of the overall Benson Hill Annexation budget. • Funding Source: The Benson Hill Annexation budget (state reimbursement). • Bid Irregularities: None with the apparent low bidder. • Staff Recommendation: Award the contract for the City Hall H.R. Remodel to the apparent low bidder, Straightline Construction &Remodeling, LLC, via council concur. Cc: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Iwen Wang,Finance/IS Administrator Terry Higashiyama,Community Services Administrator hr CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: City Hall H.R. Remodel; CAG-08-132 Page 1 of 2 ,,. DATE: September 24,2008 FORMS Contractor's BID BIDDER Bid Triple Addenda Qualification Proposal Form 1 Statement **Includes Sales Tax Apus Construction,Inc. 4- 164th Ave.NE Bellevue,WA 98008 x x $229,772.00 Yuri Palatnik Bayley Construction 8005 SE 28th St. P.O.Box 9004 x x x x $231,506.00 Mercer Island,WA 98040-9004 James Dealy B2 Construction Services 1941 1st Ave. S., Ste. 2G Seattle,WA 98134 x x x x $206.044.00 Robert S. Brazier CFC Construction 20233 NE 192nd St. Renton, WA 98058 x x x x $204,187.50 — Chris F. Cummings Express Construction 355 118th Ave. SE, Ste. 100 Bellevue,WA 98005 x x x x $185,217.00 Chris Geer H.S.Builders,Inc. 1724 N. 120th St. Seattle,WA 98133 x x $176,950.60 Hin Sing Li Mayer Construction Co.,Inc. 1052 S. 230th St. Des Moines,WA x x x x $216,910.00 Paul A.Mayer Mike Werlich Construction,Inc. P.O. Box 46579 Seattle,WA 98146 x x x x $217,962.00 Mike Werlich CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET 'ROJECT: City Hall H.R.Remodel;CAG-08-132 Page 2 of 2 SATE: September 24,2008 FORMS Contractor's BID BIDDER Bid Triple Addenda Qualification Proposal Form 1 Statement **Includes Sales Tax Pacific Construction System,Inc. 2275 116th Ave.NE, St. 100 Bellevue,WA 98004 x x x x $201,461.43 Roy E. Alexander Regency NW Construction,Inc. P.O.Box 6429 Bellevue,WA 98008 x x x x $193,911.00 Brian Foote Stetz Construction P.O. Box 39220 Lakewood,WA 98439-0220 x x x x $277,103.81 Dave Stephens Straightline Construction&Remodel, LLC P.O. Box 1870 Woodinville, WA 98072 x x x x $135,160.00 ck Brown ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE'44100,,GEND: Forms:Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: For Agenda of: October 6, Dept/Div/BoardDevelopment of Community & 2008 Economic Development Staff Contact Vanessa Dolbee, Associate Planner Agenda Status x7314 Subject: Consent X Planned Acton for Sub-district 1-B of the BoeingPublic Hearing.. X Renton Plant roe Correspondence... Amended Coneptual Plan Approval.Sub-district 1-B Ordinance X Resolution Exhibits: Old Business Issue Paper New Business Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Study Sessions Center—North Information Draft Ordinance Proposed Conceptual Plan Recommended Action: Refer Planned Action and Amended Conceptual Plan to Approvals: Committee of the Whole and set a public hearing for Legal e De X Finance De October 20,2008 pt Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Amount Budgeted Transfer/Amendment Total Pro'ect Bud:et Revenue Generated Cit Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Boeing, Co. is requesting the adoption of an ordinance designating a Planned Action and the adoption of the proposed Amended Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus property for Sub-District 1-B of the Boeing Renton Plant property. Sub-District 1-B is 50.7-acre site bounded by Logan Avenue N on the west, Garden Avenue N on the east, N 8th Street on the north, and N 6t Street on the south. The 2003 Development Agreement with the Boeing Company requires Council adoption of a Conceptual Plan prior to redevelopment. This Conceptual Plan will serve as the basis for all future land use approvals related to this development. A public hearing to consider the proposed Amended Conceptual Plan and Planned Action Ordnance should be set on October 20, 2008. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Adopt the proposed Planned Action Ordinance. • Adopt the proposed Amended Conceptual Plan with the following conditions: o Park Avenue be designated as a "Pedestrian-oriented Street;" and, o Pedestrian connections shall be provided for and shown in the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B, aligning with existing/proposed pedestrian connections in surrounding areas;and, o Provisions be made in the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B to allow for the future development and extension of N.7d'Street;and, o That transit facilities (e.g., transit stops, stations and parking)be allowed within the "North 1-B" area should funding opportunities arise and development of such facilities is supportive of the surrounding redevelo,ment and sus'orted b the I ro lefty owner(s). rlrr►� \\DAEDALUSISYS2\SHARED\Divisions\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-112.Vanessa\Agenda Bill 08-112.doc ti(rY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & � ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • � � • .'"Po MEMORANDUM DATE: September 29, 2008 TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: ty, Dennis Law, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator(x 6592) 011e SUBJECT: BOEING SUB-DISTRICT 1-B CONCEPTUAL PLAN& PLANNED ACTION ISSUE: Should the City of Renton approve an Amended Conceptual Plan, in accordance with the December 2003 Development Agreement between the City and The Boeing Company, for the 50.7-acre portion of the Boeing Renton Plant, known as Sub-District 1-B; and adopt the proposed Planned Action Ordinance prepared by The Boeing Company, which would be combined with the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) completed in October of 2003? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed Amended Conceptual Plan with the following conditions: • Park Avenue be designated as a "Pedestrian-oriented Street;" for the purposes of the Urban Center Design Guidelines. • Pedestrian connections shall be provided for and shown in the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B, aligning with existing/proposed pedestrian connections in surrounding areas; and, • Provisions be made in the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B to allow for the future development and extension of N. 7th Street; and, • That transit facilities (e.g., transit stops, stations,parking, etc.) be allowed within "North 1-B" should funding opportunities arise and development of such facilities is supportive of the surrounding redevelopment and supported by the property owner(s) and; Further, staff recommends adopting the proposed Planned Action Ordinance. low h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev&plan.ing\projects\08-112.vanessa\issue papper 08-112.doc Boeing Subdistrict I-B Amended Conceptual Plan Page 2 of 8 September 29,2008 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: 2003 Boeing Development Agreement and Conceptual Planning In 2003,the City of Renton worked with The Boeing Company to change its land use policies and regulations to bring about the potential surplus and sale of portions of its Renton Plant for redevelopment. In addition to a substantial Comprehensive Plan Amendment, creation of two new zoning designations (Urban Center North 1 [UCN-1] and Urban Center North 2 [UCN-2]), and expanded design guidelines,Boeing and the City established a Development Agreement determining the public and private responsibilities necessary to bring about successful redevelopment. One of the key provisions of the Development Agreement was Conceptual Planning. In order to give the City some assurance and comfort about when and how properties would be made surplus and redeveloped in the future,the Development Agreement requires that Boeing plan, and the City Council approve, in a conceptual way,three large "subdistricts" that make up the Renton Plant "at the time at which the Owner wishes to subdivide, develop, sell, or otherwise alter any property within the subdistricts for uses not related to airplane manufacturing or supporting uses." The Development Agreement included a Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-A and it was approved by adoption of the Development Agreement. This property was purchased by Harvest Partners. However,while another development group, Center Oak,was considering purchase of the property, it presented and the Council adopted a slight revision to the Sub- District 1-A Conceptual Plan in October 2004. Harvest Partners again amended the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-A in early 2006. Sub-District 1-A is now know as"The ,, Landing" and is currently under construction as an urban retail center, including retail, residential, restaurant, and theater uses. A Conceptual Redevelopment Plan for Sub-District 1-B was submitted to the City of Renton in October of 2005 and approved in November of 2005. Thereafter,Boeing sought a Planned Action designation for Sub-District 1-B; which was approved by the City in December of 2006 under Ordinance No. 5242. In September 2007, a Master Site Plan for Sub-District 1-B and a Binding Site Plan (BSP) for the same area under the name"Lakeshore Landing 2" was approved resulting in the creation of eight additional lots within Sub-District 1-B: Lots 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, 7A, 7B, and 7C. Pursuant to the Original Conceptual Plan,the northern 21.2 acres of Sub-District 1-B (Lots 5A and 7B) of the BSP; formerly described as the "Right of First Offer(ROFO) Area," now referenced as"North 1-B,"were planned for retail uses complementary to the Harvest the expected Partnersurban entlof North 1-B did not proceed. Bog conditions,il center to the north. Due to hans in market ng now desires to market North 1-B retail development with a greater range of uses (i.e., hotel, office, employment, research/development,business and related uses, in addition to retail)that are permitted within the underlying Urban Center— North 1 zone. Now,The Boeing Company seeks to sell a portion of Sub-district 1-B and has presented the attached Amended Conceptual Plan for the Council's consideration. In addition,the Boeing Company is requesting approval of Planned Action legislation, which would be combined with the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) completed in October 2003. The approval of Planned HADivision s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-112.Vanessa\Issue Papper 08-112 doc Boeing Subdistrict I-B Amended Conceptual Plan Page 3 of 8 September 29,2008 Action legislation would streamline the permitting process by utilizing existing 1411,0,, environmental documentation, as allowed by RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-164, 168 and 315. As a result of approving Planned Action legislation, the applicant would be required to submit an environmental consistency analysis with each phase of the project and receive subsequent approvals from the City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC). The consistency analysis would be required as individual master plans and/or site plans are proposed. In addition, the adoption of Planned Action legislation provides added entitlement and scheduling predictability as the developer begins to prepare for the redevelopment of the 50.7-acre site. Requirements of a Conceptual Plan Per the 2003 Development Agreement, a proposed Conceptual Plan will include: • A narrative describing the conceptual redevelopment proposal and its relationship to the Renton's Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center—North; • The estimated timing and sequencing of property surplus and sale (if applicable); • A description of the proposed uses, including the general mix of types, estimated square footage of each building and parking for each structure, heights and residential densities; • The general description of use concentrations (i.e., residential neighborhoods, office or retail cores, etc.); • Vehicular and pedestrian circulation that includes a hierarchy and general location of type, including arterials, pedestrian-oriented streets, other local roads and pedestrian pathways; • General location and size of public open space; and • An economic benefit analysis demonstrating the conceptual development's anticipated economic impact to local, regional and state governments. The Development Agreement states "the Council will base its approval on the proposed Conceptual Plan's fulfillment of the adopted Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center North. " Once adopted, the City will use the Conceptual Plan to evaluate all subsequent development permit applications within the subdistricts based on consistency. Proposed Sub-district 1-B Conceptual Plan The attached Conceptual Plan proposal outlines Boeing's plans for the redevelopment of the property south of N. 8th Street and east of Logan Avenue N. It divides the property into two distinct parts: the northerly 21.2 acres that is currently know as North 1-B and has been identified as surplus by Boeing operations and is available for near-term redevelopment, and the southern portion of the Sub-District currently know as the Boeing Remainder, which contains 660,000 square feet of existing office buildings with re-use potential and 12.85 acres of remaining land available for in-fill redevelopment. The area noted as North 1-B, is addressed within this Amended Conceptual Plan as developing under several alternative scenarios: Scenario 1, a retail complement to The Landing's urban retail center to the north; Scenario 2, a combination of office and employment uses (Lot 5A of the BSP)and hotel uses (Lot 7B of the BSP) undertaken as separate development by potential developers; or Scenario 3, some combination of Scenarios r"` 1 and 2. H:\Division.s\Develop ser\Dev&plan.mg\PROJECTS\08-112 Vanessa\Issue Papper 08-112 doc Boeing Subdistrict 1-B Amended Conceptual Plan Page 4 of 8 September 29,2008 Scenario 1 (Attachment A) describes redevelopment of the North 1-B property as complementary to the urban retail development currently being developed as "The Landing" by Harvest Partners to the north. It includes the possibility of as much as 270,000 square feet of retail,with one large-format(big-box) retailer on the eastern side of the ro0y. e Small and medium-sized shops would also be developed on either side of Park Avenue. The plan also shows pedestrian connections between the remaining properties to the south,through the retail development and to Park Avenue N. Scenario 2 (Attachment B)has two components; the"office and employment" component and the "hotel retail" component. Lot 5A (office and employment component)would be developed to a maximum of 600,000 square feet of office and employment uses,which may include technology-related laboratory uses for research, development,testing and general and professional office uses. In addition, small-scale ground floor and/or freestanding retail uses may be included in this development. The build-out of the office and employment component would be phased,with initial buildings being surface-parked. Depending upon market conditions and demand, future buildings may include structure parking to achieve maximum density. Lot 7B (hotel retail component)would be developed with a seven to nine story hotel and two separate, small-scaleobe surfaced parked and be oriented toward Park complement and support the hotel use. All uses would Avenue N. Scenario3represents combination implemented would not exceed the overall development capacities con emplated for North 1- B. ,460, Two economic benefit analyses were completed for the subject site, one completed in 2005 to support the Original Conceptual Plan and a supplement addressing the non-retail redevelopment scenarios for Sub-district 1-B. The economic benefit analysis for Scenario 1 suggests that redevelopment of the North 1-B property would create 1,061 direct and indirect new jobs,predominately retail-oriented, and annual tax revenues to of$856,000 beginning in 2008, and$667,000 in one-time revenue to the City during construction. The supplemental economic benefit analysis completed for Scenario 2 suggests that redevelopment of the North 1-B property would create 3,150 jobs, predominately office employment. The report concludes that the current/revised conceptual plan for Sub-District 1-B essentially substitutes some hotel and restaurant development for retail and multi-family uses and continues to provide similar economic benefits to those anticipated as part of the original conceptual plan. The property south of North 1-B known as the "Boeing Remainder" is influenced by the presence of four, 1980s-vintage office buildings that are located throughout. For the purposes of this Conceptual Plan,Boeing has assumed that the existing office buildings remain and that Boeing will continue to occupy such buildings until at least 2015. As indicated within the Conceptual Plan there are four specific sites within the Boeing Remainder that have redevelopment potential termed DP1-DP4 herein. DP 1 is a 4.9-acre property in the southwest corner of the subdistrict may be available for redevelopment more quickly (2010). The subject Amended Conceptual Plan indicates DP 1's redevelopment as either a new office or laboratory facility consisting of one or more 1-1:\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-112.Vanessa\Issue Papper 08-112 doc 1 4 Boeing Subdistrict 1-B Amended Conceptual Plan Page 5 of 8 September 29,2008 structures and containing approximately 330,000 square feet of new space. DP1 could Niro accommodate the parking needs of either use onsite. DP2 and DP4 provided infill opportunities that may exist when parking requirements for the exiting office buildings are reduced. The Amended Conceptual Plan envisions the redevelopment of DP2 and DP4 with new buildings containing either lab or office uses, consistent with the current development pattern. The potential redevelopment of these parcels would result in approximately 385,000 square feet of new space in multiple structures. To accommodate parking, a new multi-storied parking garage could be constructed on DP2, any additional parking requirements could be provided within existing parking structures. DP3 is located in the northwest corner of 6th Street and Park Avenue N. The subject Amended Conceptual Plan envisions the development of this parcel with new lab or office uses, in a single story structure containing 120,000 square feet of new space. The building could be supported by dedicated parking stalls within a new, multi-user garage constructed on DP2. Overall, redevelopment with all office, all labs, or a mix of office and lab uses, the Boeing Remainder could contain up to 835,000 square feet of new space at full build-out. This new mix of uses would be at a scale consistent with the 660,000 square feet of existing office space already located in the Boeing Remainder. If the property was redeveloped to the full potential outlined in the Plan, the economic benefit analysis shows that more than 2,100 direct and indirect new jobs would be created by full redevelopment. One-time revenues to the City would top $6.2 million and new recurring annual tax revenues to Renton would nearly reach $2.3 million in 2013 and thereafter. The Vision and Policies of the Urban Center—North (Attachment C) Renton's Vision for redevelopment of the Urban Center–North, as described in the Comprehensive Plan, is one of dramatic change as existing large scale industrial buildings are reconfigured into a dynamic new retail, flex tech, and office center. This vision would be supported by the proposed plan for the North 1-B area. The Vision states, "Two initial patterns of development are anticipated within the District: one, creating a destination retail shopping district; and the other, resulting in a more diverse mixed-use, urban scale office, and technical center with supporting commercial retail uses. " In addition, Renton's vision for the Urban Center-North includes "a dense employment center;"the concept of combining new structures and re-utilizing high-quality existing structures will meet this vision of job growth which is anticipated to occur in "high-quality, well-designed flex-tech development and low- to mid-rise office, lab, and research and development buildings that provide attractive environments for companies offering high-wage careers in information technology, [and]life sciences... " Scenario 1 supports the City's vision and applicable goals for the urban Center North and District One with new retail uses on North 1-B that complement existing retail uses located north of N. 8thStreet. Scenario 2 similarly supports the City's goals and vision for the area with a mix of office, employment and hotel uses on North 1-B. Because Scenario 3 consists of some combination of uses from Scenarios 1 and 2, it is also consistent with the City's or, vision and goals for the Urban Center North and District One. H:\Division.s\Develop ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-112.Vanessa\Issue Papper 08-112.doc Boeing Subdistrict 1-B Amended Conceptual Plan Page 6 of 8 September 29,2008 The Purpose Statement for the Urban Center–North envisions redevelopment at a larger Ned scale than found in Downtown Renton with a wider range of uses,taking advantage of the greater size of available land holdings. These uses are anticipated to include some industrial- type uses as ongoing within the larger context of commercial/retail, office, and residential. The building heights proposed by the conceptual plan would be consistent with both the existing buildings to remain and Policy LU-265: "Support more urban intensity of development (e.g. building height, [etc.]) than with land uses in the suburban areas of the City... The combination of large-format retail development with medium-format retailers and smaller, specialty retail shops along Park Avenue in scenarios 1 meets the intent of Policy LU-301: "Ensure that big-box[large format]retail functions as an anchor to larger, cohesive, urban-scale retail developments." Scenario 1 of the Amended Conceptual Plan has a pedestrian orientation within the site,with connections to the perimeter along N 6th St. and Park Avenue N. This concept is consistent with Policy LU-303: "Encourage pedestrian-oriented development... "although Scenario 2 dose not address this Policy. The eventual proposed parking ratio of 3.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet is consistent with Policy LU-311: "Reduce the suburban character of development,preserve opportunities for infill development, and provide for efficient use of land by setting maximum parking standards. " Scenario 2 provides for hotel uses in combination with retail/restaurant as supporting uses. This concept is consistent with Policy LU-268: "Allow hospitality uses such as hotels, convention and conference centers." All three scenarios would add to the City's tax base,provide additional jobs and help to expand the overall mix of uses currently located in District One. This concept is consistent with Policy LU-266 and Policy LU-267: "Achieve a mix of uses that improves the City's tax and employment base" and "Support a range and variety of commercial and office uses. " Possible Conditions of Plan Approval While the proposed Amended Conceptual Plan is consistent with the Vision and Policies of the Urban Center—North, staff asks the City Council to consider approving the plan with four conditions. First, given the fact that Boeing proposes pedestrian connections through the property to Park Avenue,making it the main pedestrian access to the retail/entertainment development expected to develop in Sub-District lA to the north, and the large number of office/lab workers that will one day be in there-occupied and in-fill development occurs, staff believes that Park Avenue should have a strong pedestrian orientation. The Urban Center Design Guidelines provide enhanced streetscape and urban design requirements on streets specifically designated as"pedestrian oriented." Staff proposes that Park Avenue between N. 6th and N. 8th Streets be designated as a 414 "Pedestrian-Oriented Street" in the Conceptual Plan approval. This is consistent with the H.\Division s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-1I2.Vanessa\Issue Papper 08-112.doc . a Boeing Subdistrict 1-B Amended Conceptual Plan Page 7 of 8 September 29,2008 Vision: "Initial development may be characterized by ... a strong pedestrian-oriented spine along Park Avenue"and Policy LU-288: "Orient buildings to streets to emphasize urban character, maximize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use within the District. " Second, in order to extend the network of planned pedestrian connections throughout the area, designated pedestrian connections should be provided for in the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B. These pedestrian connections would be consistent with Policy LU-283, which "Require significant pedestrian element in internal site circulation plans. " The pedestrian connections should align with existing/proposed pedestrian connections in sounding areas. Furthermore, in order to provide for the possibility of an interconnected grid street pattern in the area, staff recommends that provisions be made in the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1- B to allow for the future development and extension of N. 7th Street. This is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy CD-59 requiring a street system that provides for a "continuous, efficient, interconnected network of roads and pathways throughout the City. " The preservation of this corridor would facilitate in further redevelopment of Sub-District 1-B at higher densities and intensities over time by providing for vehicular and pedestrian connectivity and access. This is consistent with Policy LU-285 "Consider placement of structures and parking areas in initial redevelopment plans to facilitate later infill development at higher densities and intensities over time. " Finally, staff proposes preserving the possibility of siting a transit facility in the North 1-B area. As the City Council is aware, the City, the State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and Sound Transit have been planning a HOV Direct Access Interchange on Interstate 405 at N. 8th Street. Additionally, Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) is being planned as a high-capacity transit strategy, linking Renton to Bellevue and other locations on the Eastside. Current plans for BRT, have busses exiting the freeway at N. 8th and landing in the redevelopment area, before traveling south along Logan Avenue to the Downtown Transit Center. If the City, State, and Sound Transit can outline a plan and funding for development of a transit facility, that may include passenger load/unload areas, structured parking, etc, that is supportive of redevelopment and supported by the property owners, the Conceptual Plan should allow such a facility to be developed. This is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Objective NN: "Implement Renton's Urban Center consistent with the `Urban Centers criteria of the[King County]Countywide Planning Policies to create an area of concentrated employment and housing with direct service by high capacity transit... "and Policy LU-211: "Renton's Urban Center should be maintained and redeveloped with supporting land use decisions and projects that... support development of an extensive transportation system to reduce dependency on automobiles... " CONCLUSION: Planned Action: If the proposed Planned Action Ordinance were adopted by Council, the permitting process would be streamlined by utilizing existing environmental documentation. .rr H\Division.s\Develop.ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-112.Vanessa\Issue Papper 08-112 doc Boeing Subdistrict 1-B Amended Conceptual Plan Page 8of8 September 29,2008 Amended Conceptual Plan: The Amended Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B is generally consistent with the Vision and Policies established in the Comprehensive Plan for the Urban *4400 Center—North and should be supported with the following conditions: 1) Park Avenue be designated a"Pedestrian-oriented Street;" and, 2) Pedestrian connections shall be provided for and shown in the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B,aligning with existing/proposed pedestrian connections in surrounding areas; and, 3) Provisions be made in the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B to allow for the future development and extension of N.7th Street; and, 4) Transit facilities would also be an allowed within the "North 1-B" area,should funding opportunities arise and development by the property owner(s).supportive of the surrounding redevelopmentsupported Approval of this Amended Conceptual Plan will form the basis for all land use approvals going forward,unless the Plan is amended with City Council approval. Attachments: A:Proposed Conceptual Plan,Scenario 1 B:Proposed Conceptual Plan,Scenario 2 C:Urban Center-North Vision,Objectives,and Policies cc. Jay Covington-AJLS Chief Administrative Officer Alex Pietsch-CED Administrator Gregg Zimmerman-Public Work Administrator Neil Watts-Development Services Director C.E.Vincent-Planning Director Suzanne Dale-Estey-Economic Development Director Jennifer Henning-Planning Manager Vanessa Dolbee-CED Associate Planner H:\Division.s\Develop ser\Dev&plan.ing\PROJECTS\08-112.Vanessa\Issue Papper 08-112.doc miff September 26,2005 CONCEPTUAL sti FULLER-SEARS sus PLAN ARCHITECTS SUB-DISTRICT 1 -B Q —B'firEAVA'G iiivi 1 i • `::1 i), I ,I .41 �Z{,.'8•�- :,1!£s i,' «,r- .rat - *.'F`� _ .k -1-. � I 1. y wv_ '� 8,.ar:F Vf�Lf4EET "L7,.' ,. Y __ I'e _� MAX.30%LOT COVERAGE ;g ' .; , ,s_ -';-.N14, IF 1-STORY RETAIL �' d F � (270,000 SF) +` t ° .' r a a � . ' {, 3 r! A EXIST DATA �g� }rr j V - st HUB h Si [T:':::!:..:1:::;;,,,,.;!.:,,.:3!;,,,: ,../..;:'''c' ' Ire • 3 . ' I )l'1 ) .Q " ' l` -I p 4 4 - ,.. , - - ------ 401- , � a� s w� I 41 i:-.,;--',--1,'"'''M7:;•.7:,,,,,,I.: :lilt .- " , '',1r V-. 1 ::- L''.. ;t: i ; . . '-:'; ' , • ; --. ---•.- : • -- -•-= .1--'- ' I ' $ 3 I , .. fr I. L f l 4 t• h NITS DPI-} il..:01-01-Ny' I11,111 y ' +�° MA3Q:TWOE ; - a cj`?' ^'#1. as .�'' TORY I E '' t l 1- MILY LA LUG 454 BLDG. " 3 g ' IAL (36� OQS CSF} wr S } T¢ AL ARE f i OOP ;,.r.: "7 3f T ) �h/1 KING IN DP i / i � =3 , ° GA AGE I NOT I - '^s t'r i4' i ,G i-STORM Y BLDG, __ .MAX. � t A • 3 .- ti,,,,,., 9 SF) IoO l_' NO' I t t�ilAk.7W0 PART I �' f•' - (120 000 SF) MAX,ONE r s� rvEiDG. 6 STQFIY 9 JFOFFICE {AB B s• . I§ (120�-SPY :: :(360;00 -SF - Liti,' i ,1 Pr, We�nntt NEW Q ,. - - I s •{ iPARkwG GARAGE TOTAL) OP LEWD ' `'SUPPORTEDPARKING,EXIST.PARKI ^G IN GARAGE R RETAIL NOTE: LMAX.TWO LAB 6-STORY BLDGS. O OFFICE • IF OFFICE (300,000 SF) WITH NEW 2-3 STORY PARKING GARAGE NI 1.... r PARKING GARAGE MF MULTI-FAMILY um E PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS 4 Attachment A t j Conceptual Plan Diagram, Exhibit 2 Conceptual Plan I EINl Bub-District 1B St North 8th Stree ,-4.-. O ' .1Y .74''”V4.4 ' g ,, }til li ;,'..1114, 4' ti Z"144 R� ..Fld..14,:v'3+. >e - a et le w a rt INe r a1, `. 71 ft p 1, 1-0,,27,.1,4 H 4 10F/4 It rrl.!r�.r�.6 t f�A. v��i��� O �._ i� ;;;: z 1- ,• , - 1`. o 3• ,,,:,:;r«1,t _ , g , i „ ,, , r,xi s ot ,,,,.. . m .. ri. DP-1 ;.. � .., DP.-; ; P 3 �- DP-4 Hort r th Street ^DP-1 DP-2 DP-3 DP-4 � 330:000 SF 260,000 SF 120,000 SF 10-16 I . Mi- Y 125,000 SF TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL „ OFFICE OFFICE OR OFFICE OR OR LAB LAB LAB OFFICE OR ; LAB t-' 1,;314 . € -dangle Legend O Office aonn 5 L Lab S9” uce.14. Sircei H Hotel R Retail iii P Parking Garage - `rll AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Attachment B 03003-0105/LE0AL 14505979.7 9/11/08 Amended 12/10/07 Objective LU-WW: Improve the visual and physical appearance of buildings to create a more positive image for downtown. Policy LU-258. Site and building designs, (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and setback; landscaping; and parking, should reflect unity of design to create a distinct sense of place and mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent uses. Policy LU-259. Incentives should be developed to encourage rehabilitation (e.g. facade restoration) of older downtown buildings. Objective LU-XX: Maintain and expand the available amenities to make the Urban Center-Downtown more appealing to existing and potential customers, residents, and employees. Policy LU-260. Design guidelines should assist developers in creating attractive projects that add value to the downtown community, attract new residents, employees, and visitors, and foster a unique downtown identity. Policy LU-261. Design guidelines may vary by zone within the downtown area to recognize and foster unique identities for the different land use areas (i.e. South Renton's Burnett Park Subarea). Policy LU-262. New downtown parks should complement existing park facilities and be compatible with planned trails. Trails should be integrated with the existing trail system. Policy LU-263. Urban Center-Downtown development should be designed to take advantage of existing unique downtown amenities such as the Cedar River, City parks and trails, the downtown Transit Center, IKEA Performing Arts Center, and Renton High School. Policy LU-264. Public amenities such as art, fountains, or similar features should be incorporated into the design of public areas, major streets and gateways of the Urban Center- Downtown. URBAN CENTER NORTH LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The purpose of the UC-N is to redevelop industrial land for new office, residential, and commercial uses at a sufficient scale to implement the Urban Centers criteria adopted in the Countywide Planning Policies. This portion of the Urban Center is anticipated to attract large-scale redevelopment greater than that in the Urban Center-Downtown, due to large areas of land available for redevelopment. In addition, new development is expected to include a wider group of uses including remaining industrial activities, new research and development facilities, laboratories, retail integrated into pedestrian-oriented shopping districts, and a range of urban-scale, mixed- use residential, office and commercial uses. The combined uses will generate significant IX 43 Attachment C Amended 12/10/07 tax income for the City and provide jobs to balance the capacity for the more than 5,000 additional households in the Urban Center. Development is expected to complement the Urban Center-Downtown. UC-N policies will provide a blueprint for the transition of land over the next 30 years into this dynamic, urban mixed-use district. Policy LU-265. Support more urban intensity of development(e.g. building height,bulk, landscaping, parking standards) than with land uses in the suburban areas of the City outside the Urban Center. Policy LU-266. Achieve a mix of uses that improves the City's tax and employment base. Policy LU-267. Support a range and variety of commercial and office uses. Policy LU-268. Allow hospitality uses such as hotels, convention and conference centers. Policy LU-269. Co-locate uses within a site and/or building in order to promote urban style, mixed-use development. Policy LU-270. Support incorporation of public facilities such as schools, museums, medical offices, and government offices into redevelopment efforts by developing a public/private partnership with developers and other Renton stakeholders such as the school district, technical college, and hospital district. Policy LU-271. Support uses that sustain minimum Urban Center employment levels of 50 employees per gross acre and residential levels of 15 households per gross acre within the entire Urban Center. Policy LU-272. Support uses that serve the region, a sub-regional, or citywide market as well as the surrounding neighborhoods. Policy LU-273. Support integration of community-scale office and service uses including restaurants, theaters, day care, art museums and studios. Policy LU-274. Support transit stations and transit usage connecting to a system of park and ride lots outside the Urban Center-North. Support park and ride facilities within the Urban Center only when they are included in structured parking as a stand-alone use or are developed as part of a mixed-use project. Policy LU-275. Support an expanded and extended public right-of-way in the vicinity of the present Logan Avenue to provide new arterial access within the Urban Center. Additionally, this will provide a physical buffer between redevelopment and continuing airplane manufacturing operations. Policy LU-276. Support extension of Park Ave. to Lake Washington. `1 IX-44 Amended 12/10/07 �✓ Policy LU-277. Recognize the need for secure limited access within large manufacturing facilities by retaining private drives and roads in areas where airplane manufacturing operations continue. Policy LU-278. Support creation of a significant gateway feature within gateway nodes in the Urban Center-North. Policy LU-279. Support private/public partnerships to plan and finance infrastructure development, public uses and amenities. Policy LU-280. Use a hierarchy of conceptual plan, master plan and site plan review and approval to encourage the cohesive development of large land areas within the Urban Center-North. Incorporate integrated design regulations into this review process. Policy LU-281. Address the mix and compatibility of uses, residential density, conceptual building, site and landscape design, identification of gateway features, signs, circulation, transit opportunities, and phasing through master plan and site plan review process. Policy LU-282. Fully integrate signage, building height, bulk, setbacks, landscaping, and parking considerations in structures and site plans across the various components of each proposed development. Niow- Policy LU-283. Require significant pedestrian element in internal site circulation plans. Policy LU-284. Allow phasing plans for mixed-use projects. Policy LU-285. Consider placement of structures and parking areas in initial redevelopment plans to facilitate later infill development at higher densities and intensities over time. Policy LU-286. Support structured parking to facilitate full redevelopment of the Urban Center over the 30-year planning horizon. Where structured parking is infeasible for early phases of development, parking should be located in the rear or the side of the primary structure. Policy LU-287. Discourage parking lots between structures and street right-of-way. Policy LU-288. Orient buildings to streets to emphasize urban character, maximize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use within the District. Policy LU-289. Use design regulations to provide direction on site design, building design, landscape treatments, and parking and circulation. IX-45 Amended 12/10/07 Policy LU-290. Support a combination of internal and external site design features such as: 1) Plazas; 2) Prominent architectural features; 3) Significant natural features; 4) Distinctive focal features; and 5) Gateways. IX-46 Amended 12/10/07 / \\: / i - f. f '1. ;� '':-rt.- =: f +t - _ 1: Fs. - _ _- - - 2 r s. J✓,. ' i \ \C., „ L :„.„ ,:,: ,, ,,,,,, ,, \ ,\ 1_et;r :.z. i , 1 I i I ,\,,,____, :________,,,,.., , _ ' .:1 „z„,,,,,,,,, ,, , -,Lid 1,. A\ V I ..:, ! \ ' ,-,z, ',,, 'IN, .r. Ji , I=tliLi(_.1 .: _ ILA ` :ilia!: ! - Ti 1 � .x : . /, II ,, 41 Li jiTIE I ,-,f.'I.97.[7:7-Zi` / - ', : __,---, ) ;:., ,,,.. .c" , , ,„: ,:, ,,_ .4. _ , �J ,;,„„.„ — I. , , ,,, _��: , � Y IBJ -;,-..,,g'----,,...„77:2-6J://',-: 1 l'-j:if r--:17:::: ,. .... .1]al.TDM-riiji:v ,,,,,, , ' F : :"Z-/-A7 7'' : \4 --i-i''''r :r;.,A T: ,- ',1,.Tii,,, , ii .-,,...„ ___._-, ,„ ,-:-. ,. -,:--•,,,, :,,,,, „. :: :. ,. ,..- r� ,„-,,,,, :ii.g3..___:„1 rip, , ..ii, ;„;,t, _.,., ,.. , _ _ _ z.„-„,._: ,,: 7•:;„ .7,-; ' .--. : -- ,,, \ , - - .ad-- J. db. ,,..L :n:-.zl--v:2\a-, ‘. .,'T ' ': i: lc ,� 111 79Pr21::1: i _.n'ii 1 : .___ ,/-,, 1,.... .,,., , , 1 :..fI-71 1 i I \ s : ,tt t�.I . Urban ._, _ _ F .. ; Center Map ..:.:...:.... —-- City Limits yo Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ♦; )• Aksly2007Admiistrator Urban Center Boundary l'7,,,-7. C.C.I72% Il July 3007 i ow 1X-47 Amended 12/10/07 Policies for Surrounding Residential Area (North Renton Neighborhood,south of N 6th St) Policy LU-291. Provide a transition in land use with respect to intensity of development where areas mapped Residential Single Family and Residential Options border Urban Center-North designations. Policy LU-292. Create boulevard standards for arterial streets connecting or running through adjacent residential neighborhoods that address noise, pedestrian sidewalks, planting areas between vehicular lanes and pedestrian areas, traffic calming techniques, lighting standards, a landscape planting plan for street trees and other vegetation, and street furniture. Policy LU-293. Support a mix of activities within the Urban Center- North designation that supports populations in adjacent residential areas as well as new development within the re-development area. Examples of uses that serve the needs of existing populations include neighborhood-scale retail that addresses the day-to-day needs of residents, restaurants and coffee houses, public facilities, and places of assembly such as parks and plazas. Policies for Public Facilities Policy LU-294. Evaluate public facility needs for projected new populations within the Urban Center—North to accommodate a wide range of future users. 4111110 Policy LU-295. Support a partnership with community stakeholders such as the Renton School District to provide a transition for public properties adjacent to the Urban Center— North such as the Sartori School and Renton Stadium facilities. Transition of these facilities could range from accommodating a new clientele as the area transitions to mixed-use activities, or physical redevelopment of properties addressing the needs of employees or residents of the Urban Center. Policy LU-296. Recognize the Renton Municipal Airport as an Essential Public Facility. (See section on Airport Compatible Land Use policies). Urban Center North Districts The proposed Urban Center-North is divided into two districts for planning purposes. Each district has a different emphasis in terms of range, intensity, and mix of uses. These are District One, east of Logan Avenue, and District Two, west of Logan Avenue. The implementation of planning concepts for District Two will be dependent on decisions by The Boeing Company regarding continued airplane assembly operations at the Renton Plant. For this reason, initiation of redevelopment in District Two will likely occur after transition of the area east of Logan Avenue, District One,has begun. Consolidation of Boeing operations may cause certain property located within District ,44 One to be deemed surplus, making it available for redevelopment within the near future. IX-48 Amended 12/10/07 District One is envisioned to include a variety of uses. The intensity of these uses would �.. require substantial infrastructure improvements. More extensive development, ultimately anticipated with the future development of District Two, will likely require even more significant infrastructure upgrades. Redevelopment in both districts of the Urban Center-North will be responsive and protective of the North Renton residential neighborhood to the south. While the North Renton neighborhood is not a part of the Urban Center, its residents will benefit from the significant amenities provided by development of a new urban community. Redevelopment within both districts will occur in a manner that is not incompatible with the operations at the Renton Municipal Airport, recognizing that the airport is an Essential Public Facility located within an urban area. Redevelopment within both districts will be consistent with the City's Airport Compatible Land Use Program. The program responds to State requirements to consider how land use in the surrounding areas affects the Renton airport. The current supply of underutilized land north of N. 8th Street creates an immediate redevelopment opportunity for a first phase of development in District One. However, the industrial character of the surrounding developed properties, both within District Two to the west and the Employment Area-Industrial area to the east, will make it difficult to achieve true urban intensities in District One at the beginning of this transition. The overall Vision for the District contemplates much more than a series of low-rise %m, structures with large parking lots. Therefore, it is important that this initial development facilitates later stages of investment as the neighborhood matures and property values increase. It is also critical that the early-stage vision for District One sets the stage for high-quality redevelopment in District Two. The following "visions" have been developed for each District. Vision -District One The changes in District One will be dramatic, as surface parking lots and existing large- scale industrial buildings are replaced by retail, flex tech, and office uses. Initial development may be characterized by large-format, low-rise buildings surrounding internal surface parking lots and bordered by a strong pedestrian-oriented spine along Park Avenue. As the Urban Center-North evolves, the buildings of District One may be remodeled and/or replaced with taller, higher density structures. Parking structures may also be built in future phases as infill projects that further the urbanization of the District. Two initial patterns of development are anticipated within the District: one, creating a destination retail shopping district; and the other, resulting in a more diverse mixed-use, urban scale office and technical center with supporting commercial retail uses. It is hoped that over time these patterns will blend to become a cohesive mixed-use district. In its first phases of development, District One hosts for the region a new form of retail �.r center. Absent are the physical constraints of a covered mall. Although parking initially IX-49 MilI. Amended 12/10/07 may be handled in surface lots, their configuration,juxtaposed with smaller building units, eliminates the expanse of paving that makes other retail shopping areas unappealing to pedestrians. Building facades, of one or two stories, are positioned adjacent to sidewalks and landscaped promenades. Destination retail uses that draw from a sub-regional or regional market blend with small, specialty stores in an integrated shopping environment to support other businesses in the area. While large-format ("big- box") retail stores anchor development, they do not stand-alone. Rather, they are architecturally and functionally connected to the smaller shops and stores in integrated shopping centers. Cafes with outdoor seating, tree-lined boulevards and small gathering places invite shoppers to linger after making their initial purchases.Retail development takes an urban form with high-quality design considering a human scale and pedestrian orientation. While retail development will add to the City's tax base and create a modest increase in employment, the vision for the Urban Center-North is that of a dense employment center. Within the initial phases of redevelopment,job growth will also occur in high-quality, well-designed flex/tech development and low- to mid-rise office, lab and research and development buildings that provide attractive environments for companies offering high- wage careers in information technology, life sciences and light ("clean") manufacturing and assembly industries. Redevelopment in this area will also include residential opportunities in low- to mid-rise buildings with upper-story office and/or ground-related retail. Additional supporting retail will also be constructed. Logan Avenue is extended and redeveloped for public use as a major, tree-lined parkway. During the second generation of redevelopment in District One, changing property values and further investment will allow for higher density development in the form of offices and residences mixed with other uses. As this area is transformed into a mature mixed- use district, community gathering spaces and recreation facilities to support the City's neighborhoods and business districts become viable. Cultural facilities, as well as convention and conference centers may be located within the District and could be incorporated into mixed-use development with retail, office and hotels. Small parks, open space, and community gathering places will be incorporated into site design. Facilities such as multiple-screen theaters and other cultural facilities may add to the amenity value of the District. District One Policies Objective LU-YY: Create a major commercial/retail district developed with uses that add significantly to Renton's retail tax base, provide additional employment opportunities within the City, attract businesses that serve a broad market area and act as a gathering place within the community. Policy LU-297. Support office and technology-based uses with retail uses and services along portions of the ground floors to facilitate the creation of an urban and pedestrian Nara environment. IX-50 Amended 12/10/07 Policy LU-298. Support uses supporting high-technology industries such as biotechnology, life sciences, and information technology by providing retail amenities and services in the area. Policy LU-299. Allow for the development of destination retail centers that are consistent with a district-wide conceptual plan. Policy LU-300. Encourage the placement of buildings for retail tenants along pedestrian- oriented streets to create urban configurations. Policy LU-301. Ensure that big-box retail functions as an anchor to larger, cohesive, urban-scale retail developments. Policy LU-302. Encourage a variety of architectural treatments and styles to create an urban environment. Objective LU-ZZ: Create an urban district initially characterized by high-quality, compact, low-rise development that can accommodate a range of independent retail, office, research, or professional companies. Support the continuing investment in and transition of low-rise development into more intensive, urban forms of development to support a vital mixed-use district over time. Policy LU-303. Encourage pedestrian-oriented development through master planning, tour building location, and design guidelines. Policy LU-304. Support urban forms of setback and buffering treatment such as: a) Street trees with sidewalk grates, b) Paving and sidewalk extensions or plazas, and c) Planters and street furniture. Policy LU-305. Allow phasing plans for developments as part of the master plan and site plan review that: a) Provide a strategy for future infill or redevelopment with mixed-use buildings. b) Preserve opportunities for future structured parking and more intense employment-generating development. Policy LU-306. Support parking at-grade in surface parking lots only when structured or under-building parking is not viable. Policy LU-307. Support development of parking structures using private/public partnerships when the market will not support structural parking without subsidy. Policy LU-308. Support surface parking lots behind buildings, and in the center of blocks, screened from the street by structures with landscape buffers. tow IX-51 Amended 12/10/07 Policy LU-309. Consider public/private participation in provision of structured parking, to stimulate additional private investment and produce a more urban environment. Policy LU-310. Support shared parking by averaging parking ratios for co-located and mixed-uses. Policy LU-311. Reduce the suburban character of development, preserve opportunities for infill development, and provide for efficient use of land by setting maximum parking standards. Policy LU-312. Support the co-location of uses within a site and/or building in order to promote urban style mixed-use (commercial/retail/office/residential) development. Policy LU-313. Discourage ancillary retail pads. Vision -District Two Ongoing Boeing airplane manufacturing is supported by the City and expected to continue across District Two for the foreseeable future. This important industrial base will continue to provide high-wage jobs within the Urban Center–North as redevelopment occurs in District One. Should Boeing surplus property west of Logan Avenue, redevelopment that follows will take on more urban characteristics, incorporating mixed-use (residential, office, and No retail) development types. Planning for the redevelopment of District Two will take into "' consideration the unique issues involved in the transition of a site historically used for heavy industry adjacent to the Renton Municipal Airport. Redevelopment will be consistent with the Renton Municipal Airport Compatible Land Use Program. Eventually, redevelopment will lead to the creation of a vibrant new lakefront community providing additional housing, shopping, and employment opportunities to the region. The South Lake Washington neighborhood will be a center of activity in the Puget Sound region—a premiere address for residents, a hub of economic activity providing capacity for high-wage jobs, and a world-class destination for shopping, dining, recreation, and entertainment Mixed-use projects will be high in design and construction quality, and offer landmark living, shopping, and working environments planned to take advantage of a regionally centralized location, efficient access, mass transit, potential passenger ferry connections, stellar views of lake and mountains, and restored natural environments along the Cedar River and Lake Washington shorelines. Development within District Two will be organized into neighborhoods with housing, shopping, employment, and recreation opportunities located within walking distance. Low- to mid-rise buildings will be located to the south while development to the north will be primarily mid-to- high-rise in order to maximize views. While some on-street or surface parking may occur, the majority of parking will be provided in the lower levels of IX-52 Amended 12/10/07 mixed-use buildings or in stand-alone structures designed to blend in with the surrounding neighborhood. This environment attracts a residential population living in up-scale neighborhoods featuring higher-density condominium and apartment forms of housing north of N. 8th St. Townhouse developments south of N. 8th St. provide a transition to the adjacent North Renton neighborhood in terms of scale and use of buildings. Residents of both neighborhoods will find ample shopping and employment opportunities in the immediate vicinity. Residents, employees and visitors will enjoy new public open space. These range from public access to the lakefront through small parks, overviews, and trails, to large public plazas and central greens that provide gathering places, recreational opportunities, and a celebration of views of the Seattle skyline, the Olympic Mountains, and Mount Rainier. District Two Policies Objective LU-AAA: Support ongoing airplane manufacturing and accessory uses. Policy LU-314. Support existing airplane manufacturing and accessory uses while allowing for the gradual transition to other uses should The Boeing Company surplus property within District Two. Policy LU-315. Allow airplane manufacturing and related accessory uses such as oitair airplane sales and repair, laboratories for research, development and testing, medical institutions, and light industrial uses including small scale or less intensive production and manufacturing, and fabricating with accessory office and support services. Objective LU-BBB: If Boeing elects to surplus property in District Two, land uses should transition into an urban area characterized by high-quality development offering landmark living, shopping and work environments planned to take advantage of access and views to the adjacent river and lake shorelines. Policy LU-316. Should The Boeing Company elect to surplus properties in District Two support the redevelopment with a range and variety of commercial, office,research, and residential uses. 1) Support a mid- to high-rise scale and intensity of development. 2) Support retail and service activities as ancillary uses that are synergistic with commercial, office,biotech, research, technology, and residential activities. Traditional retail (Main Street), general business and professional services, and general offices are examples of the types of uses that are supported in combination with other activities. 3) Support urban scale residential development in District Two. North of N. 8th Street structured parking should be required. IX-53 Amended 12/10/07 4) Allow a limited range of service uses, such as churches, government offices and facilities, commercial parking garages, and day care centers through the conditional use process. 5) Allow eating and drinking establishments and cultural facilities as part of office or mixed-use development. 6) Prohibit new warehousing, storage including self-storage, vehicle sales, repair and display (including boats, cars, trucks and motorcycles), assembly and packaging operations, heavy and medium manufacturing and fabrication unrelated to production of new commercial airplanes. 7) Support development of public amenities such as public open space, schools, recreational and cultural facilities, and museums. 8) Allow commercial uses such as retail and services provided that they support the primary uses of the site and are architecturally and functionally integrated into the development. CENTER VILLAGE LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: Center Village is characterized by areas of the City that provide an opportunity for redevelopment as close-in urban mixed-use residential and commercial areas that are pedestrian-oriented. These areas are anticipated to provide medium to high-density residential development and a wide range of commercial activities serving citywide and sub-regional markets. Center Villages typically are developed within an existing suburban land use pattern where opportunities exist to modify the development pattern to accommodate more growth within the existing urban areas by providing for compact urban development, transit orientation, pedestrian circulation, and a community focal point organized around an urban village concept. Objective LU-CCC: Develop Center Villages, characterized by intense urban development supported by site planning and infrastructure that provide a pedestrian scale environment. Policy LU-317. Apply the Center Village designation to areas with an existing suburban and auto-oriented land use pattern, which, due to availability and proximity to existing residential neighborhoods, are candidate locations for a higher density mixed-use type of development. Policy LU-318. Implement the Center Village Designation using multiple zoning designations including Residential 14 (R-14), Center Village (CV), and the Residential Multi-family zones (RMF, RM-U, RM-T). Strategy 319.1. Evaluate commercial and residential development standards in the Center Village and replace zoning designations or re-zone with the vision for a Center Village designation Strategy 319.2. Prepare a Highlands Plan as a sub-area plan to further refine the land use concept for and implement the Center Village land use concepts. Phasing of the IX-54 DRAFT 09/24/08 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON Would supersede- ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance Alo. 502 adopte4 ia-1I-Rao' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING A PLANNED ACTION FOR SUB-DISTRICT 1-B OF THE BOEING RENTON PLANT PROPERTY, AN APPROXIMATELY 51 ACRE PARCEL BOUNDED BY LOGAN AVENUE N., GARDEN AVENUE N.,NORTH 8TH STREET,AND 6TH STREET. WHEREAS, RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-164, - 168, and - 172 allow and govern the application of a Planned Action designation; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) entitled the "Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS" has been prepared to study the impacts of redeveloping a portion of Boeing's Renton Plant property; and WHEREAS, the EIS analyzed the potential environmental impacts of mixed-use development on that portion of the Boeing Renton Plant known as Sub-District 1-B (see Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 5026, the City has amended the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map for the Boeing Renton Plant from Employment Area — Industrial (EA-I), Employment Area — Transition (EA-T) and Employment Area Office (EA-O) to Urban Center North(UC-N); and WHEREAS, by Ordinance. No. 5027, the City has amended the Zoning Map for the Boeing Renton Plant from Center Office Residential (COR) and Commercial Office (CO), to Urban Center North 1 (UC-N1); and WHEREAS, in 2003, the City and Boeing entered into a Development Agreement based on the analysis in the EIS, which is recorded under King County recording number 20031210001637 ("Boeing Development Agreement"); and 1 ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT 09/24/08 N..- WHEREAS, on November 7, 2005, the City approved a Conceptual Plan for Sub- District 1-B ; and WHEREAS, on the City approved an Amended Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B ("Amended 1B Conceptual Plan"), attached as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Consistency Analysis has been prepared for Sub-District 1B, which compares the Amended 1B Conceptual Plan to the range of development alternatives analyzed in the EIS; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance designates certain land uses and activities within Sub- District 1-B as "Planned Actions" that are consistent with the Urban Center North 1 (UC-NI) designation and zone; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Purpose. The City of Renton declares that the purpose of this ordinance is to: A. Set forth a procedure designating certain project actions within Sub-District 1-B as "Planned Actions" consistent with state law, RCW 43.21C.031; and B. Provide the public with an understanding as to what constitutes a Planned Action and how land use applications which qualify as Planned Actions within Sub-District 1-B will be processed by the City; and C. Streamline and expedite future land use permit review processes for development in the Sub-District 1-B area that is consistent with the Amended 1B Conceptual Plan by relying on existing detailed environmental analysis for this area. tow 2 ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT 09/24/08 SECTION II. Findings. The City Council finds that: 'leso A. The EIS addresses all significant environmental impacts associated with the scenarios described in the EIS for Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 as referenced therein, and the Amended 1B Conceptual Plan is encompassed by and consistent with those Alternatives; and B. The mitigation measures contained in the Boeing Development Agreement, together with the City's development standards, and standard mitigation fees (Parks, Fire and Traffic), are adequate to mitigate any significant adverse environmental impacts of development pursuant to the Amended 1B Conceptual Plan; and C. The expedited permit review procedure set forth in this Ordinance is and will be a benefit to the public,will protect the environment, and will enhance economic development; and D. Opportunities for public involvement have been provided as part of the Comprehensive Plan redesignation, the Boeing Plant rezone, the EIS, and the Conceptual Plan review and approval process for Sub-District 1-B. SECTION III. Designation of Planned Action; Procedure and Criteria for Evaluating and Establishing Projects as Planned Actions. A. Planned Action Designated. The Planned Action designation shall apply to the Sub-District 1-B site, as shown on Exhibit A, and associated off-site improvements. Uses and activities described in the Amended 1B Conceptual Plan, attached as Exhibit B, subject to the thresholds described in Alternatives 1, 2, 3, and 4 analyzed in the EIS, and subject to the mitigation measures required by City Codes or contained in the Boeing Development Agreement, are designated Planned Actions pursuant to RCW 43.21.C.031. Additionally, the Planned Action designation shall apply to any off-site improvements necessitated by the 3 ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT 09/24/08 proposed development on Sub-District 1B, where the off-site improvements have been analyzed in the EIS. B. Environmental Document. A Planned Action designation for a site-specific permit application shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the EIS. The Development Agreement, together with existing City codes, ordinances, standard mitigation fees, and standards, shall provide the framework for a decision by the City to impose conditions on a Planned Action project. Other environmental documents incorporated by reference in the EIS may also be utilized to assist in analyzing impacts and determining appropriate mitigation measures. C. Planned Action Review Criteria. 1. The Director of Development Services, or the Director's designee, is owe hereby authorized to designate a project application as a Planned Action pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a), if the project application meets WAC 197-11-172 and all of the following conditions: (a) The project is located on Sub-District 1-B, or is an off-site improvement directly related to a proposed development on Sub-District 1-B; and (b) The project is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan adopted under RCW 36.70A; and (c) The Director has determined that the project's significant environmental impacts have been adequately addressed in the EIS by reviewing the environmental checklist or other project review form as specified in WAC 190-11-315; and (d) The project complies with the Planned Action threshold described in this Ordinance; and 4 ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT 09/24/08 (e) The Director has determined that the project's significant impacts have been mitigated through the application of the Boeing Development Agreement, as well as other City requirements, standard mitigation fees, and conditions, which together constitute sufficient mitigation for any significant environmental impacts associated with Sub-District 1-B development; and (f) The proposed project complies with all applicable local, state and federal regulations, and where appropriate, needed variances or modifications or other special permits have been requested; and (g) The proposed project is not an essential public facility. D. Effect of Planned Action. 1. Upon designation by the Director that the project qualifies as a Planned Action, the project shall not be subject to a SEPA threshold determination, an environmental impact statement (EIS), or any additional review under SEPA. 2. Designation as a Planned Action means that a proposed project has been reviewed in accordance with this Ordinance, and found to be consistent with the development parameters and environmental analysis included in the EIS. 3. Planned Actions will not be subject to further procedural review under SEPA. However, projects will be subject to conditions designed to mitigate any environmental impacts which may result from the project proposal, and projects will be subject to whatever permit requirements are deemed appropriate by the City under State and City laws and ordinances. 4. Amendments of the approved Amended Sub-District 1B Conceptual Plan may be approved administratively, so long as such amendments remain consistent with the spirit 5 ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT 09/24/08 and intent of the adopted Plan. For development of Sub-District 1B qualifying as a planned action pursuant to this Ordinance, a proposed amendment of the Amended Sub-District 1B Conceptual Plan is consistent with the adopted Plan's spirit and intent if such amendment does not exceed the maximum development parameters analyzed in the EIS. If amendments of the Amended Sub-District 1B Conceptual Plan exceed the maximum development parameters reviewed in the EIS, supplemental environmental review may be required under the SEPA rules. E. Planned Action Permit Process. The Director shall establish a procedure to review projects and to determine whether they meet the criteria as Planned Actions under State laws and City codes and ordinances. The procedure shall consist, at a minimum, of the following: 1. Development applications shall meet the requirements of RMC Chapters ,, 4-8 and 4-9. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the Department and shall include a SEPA checklist or revised SEPA checklist [where approved through WAC 197-11-315(2)] or such other environmental review forms provided by the Department of Community and Economic Development. The checklist may be incorporated into the form of an application. 2. The Director shall determine whether the application is complete as provided in RMC Chapter 4-8. 3. If the project application is within Sub-District 1-B, the application shall be reviewed to determine whether the proposed application is consistent with and meets all of the qualifications specified in Section III of this Ordinance. 4. Upon review of a complete application by the City, the Director shall determine whether the project qualifies as a Planned Action. If the project does qualify, the bra Director shall notify the applicant, and the project shall proceed in accordance with the 6 ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT 09/24/08 appropriate permit procedure, except that no additional SEPA review, threshold determination, or EIS shall be required. 5. Public notice for projects that qualify as Planned Actions shall be tied to the underlying permit. If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action. If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no notice is required. 6. If a project does not qualify as a Planned Action, the Director shall notify the applicant and prescribe an appropriate SEPA review procedure consistent with City SEPA procedures and state laws. The notice to the applicant shall describe the elements of the application that result in disqualification as a Planned Action. 7. Projects disqualified as a Planned Action may use or incorporate relevant elements of the EIS, as well as other environmental documents to assist in meeting SEPA requirements. The Environmental Review Committee may choose to limit the scope of the SEPA review to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the EIS. SECTION IV. Validity Period. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed no later than December 31, 2018, by the Development Services Director to determine its continuing validity with respect to the environmental conditions of the subject site and vicinity and applicability of Planned Action requirements. Based upon this review, the Ordinance may be amended as needed, and another validity period may be specified.= SECTION V. Conflict. In the event of a conflict between the Ordinance or any mitigation measures imposed pursuant thereto and any other ordinance, or regulation of the City, the provisions of this Ordinance shall control, EXCEPT that provision of any Uniform Code shall supersede. Now 7 ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT 09/24/08 '4,,,,. SECTION VI. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. SECTION VII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.15 03:9/l I/0 8:s cr err 8 r of aE N, NG D G CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN s SEp 2041 Sub-District 1-B December 2008 Amendment Renton, Washington Background The Boeing Company ("Boeing") has been working with the City of Renton(the "City") since early 2003 to evaluate potential redevelopment strategies associated with its 737 facility in Renton, Washington(the "Renton Plant Site"). In October of 2003, Boeing prepared an Environmental Impact Statement to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with redeveloping the Renton Plant Site with a mix of residential and commercial uses (the "EIS"). In December 2003, Boeing and the City entered into a Development Agreement for Renton Plant Redevelopment(the "Development Agreement")that established certain roles and responsibilities for the potential phased redevelopment of all or a portion of the Renton Plant Site, including: • Renton commitments to fund and construct certain public infrastructure improvements; • Boeing commitments to fund certain private aspects of redevelopment; and Num • Boeing commitments to complete Conceptual Plans when it elects to subdivide, develop, sell, or otherwise alter any property for uses not related to airplane manufacturing. Per the terms of the Development Agreement, Conceptual Planning was anticipated to occur incrementally, and would be completed for three discrete areas of the Site, known as Sub-Districts 1-A and 1-B, and District 2 (see Exhibit 1). City Council approved Boeing's Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-A in December 2003 and amended it in October 2004. Boeing subsequently sold this portion of the site to Harvest Partners in December 2004. Harvest Partners again amended the Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-A in early 2006. Sub-District 1-A is now known as "The Landing" and is currently under construction as an urban retail center, including retail, residential, restaurant, and theatre uses. Sub-District 1-B Sub-District 1-B is located immediately to the south of The Landing, as illustrated on Exhibit 1, and totals approximately 50.7 acres. A Conceptual Redevelopment Plan for Sub- District 1-B was submitted to the City of Renton in October of 2005 and approved in November of 2005 (the "Original Conceptual Plan"). Thereafter Boeing sought a Planned Action designation for Sub-District 1-B and an Environmental Consistency Analysis was prepared (the "Consistency Analysis"). The Consistency Analysis determined that the uses proposed for Sub-District 1-B in the Original Conceptual Plan, together with the cumulative 4111 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 1 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 impacts of the uses approved for Sub-District 1-A, were within the range of development %No, alternatives and associated environmental impacts addressed in the EIS. A Planned Action was approved by the City in December of 2006 under Ordinance No. 5242. In September 2007 the City approved a Master Site Plan for Sub-District 1-B and a Binding Site Plan for the same area under the name "Lakeshore Landing 2" (the "BSP"). The BSP resulted in the creation of eight additional lots within Sub-District 1-B: Lots 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, 7A, 7B, and 7C. The Original Conceptual Plan addressed infrastructure improvements imposed as conditions of development pursuant to the Development Agreement to support redevelopment of Sub- Districts 1-A and 1-B. In particular, a portion of Sub-District 1-B was reserved for a four-lane extension of 8th Avenue between Logan and Park Avenues (the "Extension"). The Extension and related improvements have been completed. Pursuant to the Original Conceptual Plan, the northern 21.2 acres of Sub-District 1-B (Lots 5A and 7B of the BSP; formerly described as the "ROFO Area,"now referenced as "North 1- B") were planned for retail uses complementary to the Harvest Partners urban retail center to the north. Due to a change in market conditions, the expected retail development of North 1- B did not proceed. Boeing now desires to market North 1-B with a greater range of uses (i.e., hotel, office, employment, research/development, business and related uses, in addition to retail)that are permitted within the underlying Urban Center—North, District One zone ("UC-N1" or "District One"). The remainder of Sub-District 1-B contains approximately 29.5 acres and is described herein as the "Boeing Remainder." The Boeing Remainder is illustrated on Exhibit 1. Portions of the Boeing Remainder are currently improved with office buildings that Boeing owns and will continue to utilize as part of on-going airplane manufacturing plant operations. Interspersed between these existing office buildings are approximately 12.85 acres of the Boeing Remainder that have been identified as potential development parcels ("DP1" through "DP4"). This amendment of the Original Conceptual Plan (the "Amended Conceptual Plan") describes the current redevelopment plan for Sub-District 1-B. The Amended Conceptual Plan retains the retail alternative proposed for North 1-B in the Original Conceptual Plan and also includes office and employment and hotel alternatives for Lots 5A and 7B, respectively, based upon new market conditions and feedback from the City regarding its redevelopment goals for the UC-N1 zone. Boeing seeks the City's approval of this Amended Conceptual Plan so that it can market North 1-B to potential developers under a greater range of uses. The timing of a land surplus decision by Boeing or redevelopment associated with the majority of the Boeing Remainder is currently envisioned to occur between 2 and 20 years in the future. rr, AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 2 03003-0105/LEGA114505979.7 9/11/08 41E11\ Submittal Included within this submittal is a narrative description of Boeing's proposal for Sub-District 1-B, a Conceptual Plan Diagram (see Exhibit 2), and a benefit analysis demonstrating a range of potential one-time and recurring revenues generated by: (1) Development illustrated within the Conceptual Plan Diagram on the North 1- B portion of the Sub-District(beginning in 2009/2010 for Lots 5A and 7B of the BSP); and (2) Development illustrated within the Conceptual Plan Diagram on the Boeing Remainder(beginning in 2010 for DP 1 and 2016 for DP 2—DP 4). AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 3 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 Aerial, Exhibit 1 ,. - F �vs, �\ : *( '''.1 d4 _ • • A 4,... ---:, \ 1. J " y y! ^_ - 'l>fit k' ; ,a+ f .ryG ._ e. .,,.'"`✓.r-"---'" f -..-4•,•,;•,,..• It s' ,{ . — ,- — }s `s • — • Sub District 1A �' '''" ' Y K f `. r .# V '*' *• - - ... .Te' 9Fi'" pit f r xre Sub District 1 B �- ' a. Northi-B w� t :R �„� y} r F T re 3., �'� £ t' x , -n Boeing +"a - K . ., s Remainder y6 1, u G s DP-1 E 6P-2;:DP-3: DP4 ri. ' hlve:h+6th*3irent is � �" ,. te•r:r 2D G B..d ra L u E 00 t -.0O3 T i� t ° ►'a f x� x --, AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 4 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 • Conceptual Plan Diagram, Exhibit 2 Conceptual Plan i D Fifia Sub-District 1B North 8th Street , 1i t' fi# a11„,:!z, a-P4* �) '.*7 P fp s �� Nv> ., H P 10-18 Existing 0 Existing ' 0' Garage 2t c ?� " Garage 6 L _, 4 a f Z G C`ll 0, - s G.� a t o @:.j «a. .-,,ri- . #' i. :„Z li 1 i. --r5 GFH `,@,tt.'' 0 t ?", '”- 10-20 dr.2 xai§ FFiil - 3 ' DP-1 DP-2 . DP-3 a DP-4 ,— Nort .4h Street DP-1 DP-2 DP-3 330.000 SF 250.000 SF 120.000 SF DP-4 OFFICE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 125,000 SF 10-16 OFFICE OR OFFICE OR TOTAL OR LAB LABL.AB OFFICE OR LAB Existing r Garage r t r Legend 0 Office L Lab H Hotel R Retail P Parking Garage AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 5 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 Conceptual Development Plan This Amended Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B is comprised of two somewhat distinct parts. The North 1-B area makes up the northern portion of the property along 8th Avenue, has been identified as surplus by Boeing operations, and is available for near-term redevelopment. The Boeing Remainder makes up the southern portion of the Sub-District, and contains 660,000 square feet of existing office space with re-use potential and approximately 12.85 acres of land with future redevelopment potential. North Boeing recognizes that high-quality development is essential to the successful transition of the area from its industrial roots to the City's vision for the Urban Center-North. Potential developers of lots within Sub-District 1-B must join with the City to ensure that such development is well-designed and is of a quality and at a scale that is consistent with the City's long-term vision for the area. As planning for Sub-Districts 1-A and 1-B has progressed, the land south of 8th has been identified as an important component of the overall project. The area, now known as North 1-B, is addressed within this Amended Conceptual Plan as developing under several alternative scenarios: Scenario 1, a retail complement to The Landing's urban retail center to the north; Scenario 2, a combination of office and employment uses (Lot 5A of the BSP) and hotel uses (Lot 7B of the BSP) undertaken as separate development by potential developers; or Scenario 3, some combination of Scenarios 1 and 2. Each scenario is described below. Now Under all three scenarios, a smell portion of North 1-B containing a data hub for the Renton Plant Site (Lot 5E of the BSP), will be retained by Boeing for the foreseeable future. 1. Scenario 1 Under this scenario, North 1-B is envisioned to contain a large format"destination"retailer located along Logan Avenue, with supporting retail shops space concentrated along both sides of Park Avenue. Generally, the large format retail development(users with footprints of 50,000 square feet or larger, and building heights up to 45 feet)is planned to occur along 8th and Logan, facing eastward toward Park Avenue. The supporting retail shops space would include a mixture of medium format retailers (ranging between 10,000 and 50,000 square feet in area, with building heights up to 40 feet) and some component of smaller, specialty retail shops overlooking Park Avenue. Scenario 1 anticipates pedestrian connections to occur internally within the site both east toward Park Avenue and south toward 6th Avenue. Vehicle access would occur off of Park Avenue, with loading and delivery functions relying upon Garden Avenue and an internal service road running along the southern edge of the North 1-B property line. At a maximum lot coverage ratio of 30%, the North 1-B site could accommodate up to 270,000 square feet of retail space. vow AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL14505979.7 PAGE 6 9/11/08 2. Scenario 2 a. Office and Employment Component Under Scenario 2, Lot 5A would be developed to a maum of 600,000 laboratory uses for office and employment uses, which may include technology-related research, development,testing and general and professionalcluded in this development ground-floor and/or freestanding retail uses may also be scenario. At this maximum density,the majority of accessory parkingwould be p would 9be provid gs ided in an above-grade structure, and impervious surface coverage would be three to six stories in height,with floorpCon° up to approximately onent would be phased,,woth initial 0 square feet. The build-out of the Office and EmploymentP buildings being surface-parked. Depending upon densrtymarket nodif uipnso 6�0 000 squaretfeet on- ure buildings may include structured parking to achieve site, or build-out may be limited to a fully surface-parked option,ithin thisich range overall density is would be approximately 300,000 square feet. Development also possible. b. Hotel/Retail Component Under Scenario 2, Lot 7B would contain a seven to nine and story hort tel and hotel two use parateThe hotel, otmall- scale retail uses, such as restaurants,to complementpp would consist of a maximum of 130,000 square feet; esupporting oe retail uses sly would total tal a ..4101maximum of 13,000 square feet(consisting of two buildings, square feet and one approximately 8,000 square feet). All uses Avenue.would be surfaced parked. The hotel and retail uses would be oriented toward Park3. Scenario 3 Scenario 3 represents some combination of Scenarios 1 and 2. In particular, this Scenario anticipates that either Lot 5A or Lot 7B is not redeveloped ° emplement d would not exceed the instead redeveloped with retail uses. Any combination overall development capacities contemplated for North 1-B. Summary Redevelopment of the North 1-B parcel as contemplated by this Center North:Amended dation Conceptual aPlanis consistent with the City's overarching goal for the Ur large- scale, ban mixed-use development including uses such asretail, oe rhandComprehensive ent, lab offce, employment,residential and commercial. S eeg , CY d Plan, Land Use Element,Urban Center North Land Use Designation goals mp the LU- UCN"), Urban UCN"),Purpose Statement. This Plan is consistent leCenter North that encourage"a mix of uses to improve ri he City's tax and base" (Comp. Plan, LU-UCN, Policy LU-266), "support a range and variety of commercial nd office uses" (Comp. Plan, LU-UCN, Policy LU-267) and"allow hospitality uses such as hotels" (Comp. Plan, LU-UCN,Policy LU-268). The City's vision for District One PAGE 7 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 145 05979.7 9/11/08 anticipates similar new development including retail, office, employment, development, and hotel uses that ultimately result in a cohesive mixed-use district (Comp. Plan, LU-UCN, Vision-District One). esnlab, research and In particular,proposed Scenario 1 supports the City's vision and applicable Urban Center North and District One with new retail uses on North 1-B that goals ler the existing retail uses located north of 8th Avenue. Scenario 2 similarlysupportscomplement goals and vision for the area with a mix of office, employment and hotel uses Because Scenario 3 consists of some combination of uses the City's consistent with the City's vision and goals for the Urban Center on North 1-B. from Scenarios 1 and 2, it is also three scenarios would add to the City's tax base,provide additional North District One. All the overall mix of uses currently located in District One. and help to expand Boeing Remainder This portion of the Amended Conceptual Plan is significantly influenced four, 1980s-vintage office buildings that are located throughout the Boeing 10-13, 10-16, 10-18 and 10-20 buildings). Each structureby the presence of ranging between 160,000 and 170,000 square feet in area, is five with a to six stories in totalheight,area for all four Remainder(the buildings of 660,000 square feet. Parking is accommodated in sep , s and in surrounding surface lots, at an overall ratio of 4.5 stalls per 1,000 s u g currently utilizes these four buildings and anticipatesear-ter no p � tructured garages in significant rehabilitation, lease or sale of the structures. m changegs that wet.ould result At the time of the Original Conceptual Plan, a 1960s-vintage lab building, 10-71 building, was located along Logan Avenue. The 10-71 buildingwas demolished in 2008, creating a 4.9-acre development parcel between Logan known as the ("DPI"; Lot 5B of the BSP). Avenue and the10-20 building For purposes of this Amended Conceptual Plan, we have assumed that the buildings remain and that Boeing will continue to occu existing office py such buildings until at least 2015. If the existing buildings are occupied by other users at some point in the future, buildings could be supported by square feet, rather than at Boeing's more conservative rateat a . As ratio of 3.5 stalls per 1 in exist within the three existing parkinganresult, surplus parking stalls created: a 3.9-acre site between the 10-18 and 10-20 buildings three n("DP2onal "; Lot5D of the BSP);s are 1.8-acre site on the west side of Park Avenue north of 6th ("DP3"; yothe a thee property constituting DP3 was not included in the BSP); and, a 2.2-acre site on the west side of Garden north of 6th ("DP4"; the property constituting DP4 was not included in theBSP). P). Avenue BSP). r AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 PAGE 8 1. DPI Thisp 4.9-acre parcel is located along Logan Avenue, immediately south of the North 1-B pro .. Fronting on 6th Avenue, it is also adjacent to the 10-20 office building and associated y parking structure. Given its location andnear-term (2010) redevelopment evelopment potent ial this Amended Conceptual Plan envisions DPl's cedes and ontaas either a new office or laboratory facility consisting of one or more 1 330 000 square feet of new space. Given its size, d DP-1 -1thcould accommodate such thatmm thesite approximately , implemented the parking needs of whichever use was ultimately imp would be self-parked. 2. DP2 and DP4 opportunities that exist when parking requirements for the These two parcels are both infill tilized and for the most part existing office buildings are reduced. Currently uthisrnAmended Conceptual Plan envisions as overflow parking areas for Boeing employees, redevelopment of DP2 and DP4 with new buildings containing either lab or offices uses, the redev p consistent with the current development pattern.Ideveloped,uses could be surplus parking within existing private open garages some instances wherep renew development, and allow for the creation ofrnew, parking could fully supportIn order to create this spaces or campus greens within the neighborhood.assumes either that the four existing Boeing P opportunity,this Amended Conceptual Planparkingsers with market-based requirements or office buildings are sold or leased to other thee RRenton Plant Site to accommodate its that Boeing provides new parking areas o employees. p The Amended Conceptual Plan contemplates the potential redevelopment of these parcels approximately 385,000 square feet of new space in multiple 000 square feetBon DP2 and DP4 DP2 and h app lds could accommodate structures containing as mucha new multi-storied parking garage 125,000 square feet on DP4. Toaccommodate an dd t onal parking needs would be p4vided by could ar constructed on DP2, and any garage. parking would ear-marking a portion of the stalls within the 10-20 parkinthat O new p g surplus parking exists within the existing 10-18 parking garage need to be constructed in this location. 3. DP3 located just south of the 10-18 office building, atn envisions the the corner of this 6th with new This parcel is J Park structure containing 120,000 labor Avenues.fThis Amended, inboth Cohoused within a single six story supported 12 lab or office uses, in both casescould be multi-user garage constructed on DP2. If developed as by square feet of new space. If developed as lab space,the buildingdated dedicated parking stalls within a new, on DP3 or accommodated by office space,parking could either be provided in a new garage providing additional parking levels within a DP2 garage. PAGE 9 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 Summary The redevelopment of the Boeing Remainder proposed by this Amended Conceptual Plan would be consistent with the City's vision for the Urban Center planning policies, creating a vibrant, co North and long-range Logan and Garden Avenues, with mid-rise office orclab build southrridor of The Landing between structured parking behind. Whether redeveloped with all office, along street mixfrontages foffice and and lab uses, the Boeing Remainder could contain up to 835,000, allq lab,feetor a new full build-out. This new mix of uses would be at a scale consistent feet of build-out. Tohis space alreadyofoted in square 6 space at lstent with the 660,000 square the Boeing Remainder. Economic Benefit Analysis Summary Boeing's Amended Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B seeks near-term redevelopment of Boeing's underutilized assets while advocating that significantly improves the City's tax and employment to both allow for the that one cometed the support mr a mix t uses in base. Two economic benefit supplement addressing the non-retail redevelopment Scenarios for the Original Conceptual Plan (Exhibit 3 hibit 4), have been completed to support ) and a recurring revenues generated by:this submittal, demonstrating the potential one-time me and (1) Development on the North 1-B portion of the Sub-District for either retail use or a combination of hotel and office/employment uses (beginningin "` 2009/2010 for Lots 5A and 7B of the BSP); andNies (2) Development on the Boeing Remainder for office and/or (beginning in 2010 for DPI and 2016 for DP 2_ laboratory uses DP softy AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 PAGE 10 • EXHIBIT 3 STUDY 2005 ECONOMIC BENEFIT SUB DISTRICT 1-B BOEING DEVELOPMENT PARCELS RENTON, WASHINGTON I. PURPOSE is seeking to estimate the community economic bety its of so a RealtyCorporation(BRC)Boeing 'Washington arcels BoeingSub District 1-B at its Renton, redeveloping four parcels in Boeing's gross acres comprising and multi-family land uses. The land area of these redevelopment new mix of lab a portion of the 50.70 SubD comprises 12.1-B net Renton It erti . The proposed new land use mcapacity forthese ore Boeing Sub DistrictRenton pr p y parcels resulted from an eof the holding redevelopment properties and from market potential considerations. document is to show City of Renton economic benefitsd s follows:derived The r specific oiling these this Renton parcels if fully developed from redeveloping four targeted Boeing 900,000 Lab 5_ 35500 Multi-Family 1, 435,500 Sq. Ft. Total The analysis presents an estimate of economic benefits if the targeted Renton Boeing parcels absorbed between 2008 and 2013 versus no action. Economic are entirely redeveloped and(one-time and recurring) in terms of. impacts have been measured • Jobs • Income ➢ Property values • Public revenuesPAGE 11 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL14505979.7 9/11/08 State of Washington King County City of Renton II. LIMITATIONS The economic benefit findings of redeveloping the four The net economic into Boein modern lab and multi-family space g Renton parcels uncle comprising assumptions.l These assumptions reflect reasonable are only experience in the marketplace. approximations as valid as underlying p The economic benefit model developed for thisaa economic anflects these assumptions and is the culmination of a s reflects series of assignment computer-based sensitivity III. OVERALL ECONOMIC BENEFIT FINDINGS Redevelopment of the four Boeing positive economic impacts for the City of Renton, King parcels into the proposed uses will result in The text, charts and tablestthat follow income and Countyo and itng State of a comparing property value differences bysummarize economic findings Boeing parcels versus year 2013 between " g by ofte job, "no use scenarios. A summaredevelopment" of the four n'of key findings follow: By 2013 (project stabilization By acres comprising four stabilization), estimated 3,300 jobs would be created if the target 12. g and absorbed into lab and multi-famiparcels in y uses.2 Sub District 1-B are fully redeveloped Of this job total, an estimated 1,700 direct jobs would be created in the redeveloped lab buildings and 1,600 indirect jobs would be created by 2013. Although not guaranteed,the economic benefit estimates expressed information from sources deemed to be authoritative and reliable. All m dollars. p ed this documents are intended expressedto reflect 2 This job total includes both direct and indirect jobs. Indirect jobs � monetary figures in 2005 resulting(induced)from expenditures associated with direct job creation. '' � s is the measure of secondary job creation AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 145059'79.7 9/11/08 PAGE 12 NES These lab jobs would generate an additional $ 158 million in recurring annual income ➢ at full occupancy in 2013. ver $88 million in direct income would be created on the income would ➢ e eve ped Sub Distr�t 1-B parcels and over $70 million in indirect redeveloped S be created in 2013 and thereafter. values for the four target Renton ➢ The corresponding increase in property2013. redevelopment parcels is forecast at over$550 million by annual tax revenues by 2013 to the State of Washington is n ➢ The increase in recurring million. This is in addition to over $3 .ofmillion lll lab el re e state revenues at er collected redevelopment and absorption state ou Boeing parcels at the Renton Sub District 1-B site. multi- family space on the IV. RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFIT FINDINGS of Renton of redeveloping Boeing's four parcels of excess The economic benefits to the City arized. property in Sub District 1-B are now summ By 2013, it is estimated that over 2,100 ton jobs would be created in the City o Of Rin job total, an estimated 1�7n ➢ parcels in Sub District 1-B. of Rent alone from redeveloping these four Boeing 00 direct jobs would be created in the new lab buildings be created by 2013. 400 indirect jobs in the City The City of Renton is estimated to gain one-time tax revenues of over $6.2 million during redevelopment ment of the four Boeing Sub District 1-B parcels. ➢ annual tax revenues of on full build-out and absorption of the new ➢ The City is also forecast to receive increase crease in recurring over$2.3 million in 2013 and thereafter lab and multi-family space. NIS PAGE 13 AMENDED�GG�14505979.7DEVELOPMENTPLAN 03003 9/11/08 Table 1 summarizes these estimated benefits to the City municipal revesummarizes These data reflect one-time benefits during development new jobs, income and s estimates of annually recurring economic benefits. For e through s of nnuall g ng the e assumedas well 2008 development period, accrued City tax reveneareeeaumat d to g $40,000 during land development and over $6,168,000 and multi-family structures. Sources for these one-time municipal g rate over during construction revenues areof lab buildings real estate transfer taxes. revenues sales tax and Once the lab and multi-family annually recurring tax revenues are projecgted at over completed total willy result from City of Ren ton's shares are and absorbed Nearly $2,343,000. (2013 estimate), tax is forecast thee over Renton's each eof propertyCi 's employee ohead as over recast to0 gaeneraty. taxee. aTns City's employee hee d Y nd real estate transfer taxes are estimated CITY OF Table 1 RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFITS BOEING SUB DISTRICT 1-B DEVELOPMENT PARCELS Redevelo. One-time Land One-time Building ment Scenario Development Develo.ment 2008-2012 Recurring CITY JOBS in 2013 4410.1 Direct Jobs 25 Indirect Jobs 9 Total Jobs 34 381 1,700 ANNUAL INCOME 159 400 Direct Income 540 2,100 Indirect Income $ 1,285,625 $ Total Income $ 411,248 $ 49,960,680 $ 123,146,400 CITY TAX REVENUES $ 1,696,873 $ 34,962,754 $ 17,596,700 Property Tax 84,923,434 $ 140,743 100 Sales Tax - Employee Head Tax $ 40,234 $ $ 1,952,593 Real Estate Transfer Tax 3,049,318 $ Total Tax Revenues $ 3,118,965 $ 275,071 $ 115,496 $ 40,234 $ 6,168,283 $ 2,343,160 Chart 1 shows that 2,100 permanent jobs are estimated to be created within the City Renton. Of these, 1.700 would be direct on-site lab jobs in estimated 400 additional indirect off-site jobs in the City. of of the indirect estimated read occur within the the City assumes Renton,one quarter in an without he redevelopmentY This that o of the four Boeing Sub District 1-B This compares to no uh jobs parcels. AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 PAGE 14 Chart 1 46100 City of Renton Permanent Jobs Created In 2013 3,000 2,100 _ 2,000 1,000 Without Project With Project will generate new annual income within the both City off-siteRenton Chart 2 illustratesdthat these jobs income reflect as ,uril estimated at nearly $141 million. This corresponding well as direct on-site income creation in 2013 and thereafter. Chart 2 New Job Annual Income in 2013 $150 $100 — A 4, — 0 . o $50 Without Project $" With Project 4411101 PAGE 15 AMENDED/CONCEPTUAL GAL 1450 979.7 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003 9/11/08 Chart 3 shows the increases in City of Renton property Boeing parcels in Sub-District 1-B. r p p Y values of redeveloping the four value of these parcels is estimated toftincreaseredevefromeut completion in 2013 million—an increase of$550 under the assessed million. $74 million to nearly $624 Chart 3 PROPERTY VALUE INCREASES BY 2013 BOEING SUBDISTRICT 1-B DEVELOPMENT PARCELS Without Project $73.7 With Project err_ $623.8 $0 $200 $400 $600 Dollars in millions AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 PAGE 16 41400 Renton will accrue one-time tax revenues 201sales evelopment Chart 4 snows that the oveityr of Ren the estimated 2008 through City is forecast to increasingly receive annually recurring tax estate transfer taxes of the City08 000 during parcels starting alin 2009. g willx a dition, rict 1-B r period.vnI from redevelopment revenues redevelopment of th �' Sub DtspVe $2,343,000 million as an annual flow increase each year until 2013 wherepeaks into the City. Chart 4 New City Of Renton Tax Revenues $3,000,000 ■Recurring $2,000,000 - — Onetime $1,000,000 I II II II II$- 2012 2013 2008 2009 2010 2011 PAGE 17 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14 505979.7 9/11/08 ECONOMIC BENEFIT STUDY ) Y HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PARCELS BOEING SUB DISTRICT 1-B PROPERTY RENTON, WASHINGTON I. PURPOSE Boeing Realty Corporation (BRC) is seeking to estimate the community Bing Realty certain Sub District 1-B redeveloping Renton, Washington facilityubinto additional propertyl retail economic benefitsat itsof under option (ROFO) by Harvest Partners ti property is the Phase II expansion of Harvest artners'ses. rdevelopmhis "right of first option" Boeing's Renton Sub District 1B property The ROFO Phase II idered for redevelopment as retail space by development underway on p Harvest Partners is comprised of 21.20 nerea �acres. It is only a portion of the 50.70 gross acres that comprises Boeing's Renton property. It is g s entire Sub District 1-B The specific purpose of this document is to show City of Renton erived from Harvest Partners redeveloping this target ROFO the economic developed benefits follows: property if fully as Retail—Shop Space 91,000 Retail—Big Box 135,000 Total 226,000 Sq. Ft. The analysis presents an estimate of economic benefits if Harvest option to purchase the targeted Renton Boeing Partners excises their comparing the full redevelopment of this property parcels. The uses betweens are versus no action. Economic impacts have been measured (one-time measured by of: 2006inand 2008 ms and recurring) in terms AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 PAGE 18 44600 • Jobs • Income • Property values • Public revenues State of Washington King County City of Renton ram' PAGE 19 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105(LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 II. LIMITATIONS The economic benefit findings of redeveloping Harvest Part space are only as valid as the underlying assum tions.3 ners ROFO parcels into retail These assumptions reflect reasonable approximations of actual economic experience in the marketplace.p model developed for this assignment reflects these assumptions. It is the culmination of aThe economic benefa series of computer-based sensitivity analyses. III. OVERALL ECONOMIC BENEFIT FINDINGS Redevelopment of the Harvest Partners ROFO portion of the Boeing Renton Sub District 1B property into retail uses will result in positive economic impacts for the County and the State of Washington.Co economic a thefindings byg The text, charts and tables that lfollo Renton,ty of sKinge comparing job, income and property value differences by summarize between "redevelopment" of the Harvest Partners ROFO arc A summary of key findings follow: parcels versus year 2008 "no use" scenarios. By 2008 (project stabilization By 21.20 acres stabilization), Harvests)' an estimated 1,667 jobs would be created if the target redeveloped and absorbed osh pasp space and bigners ROFO ls in Sub District 1-B are fully g box retail uses.4 ➢ Of this job total, an estimated 859 direct jobs would be created in the redeveloped buildings and 808 indirect jobs would be created by 2008. These jobs would generate an additional $ 80 million in recurring g annual income at full occupancy in 2008. s Although not guaranteed,the economic benefit estimates expressed in this informationect afrom sources deemed to be authoritative and reliable. All monetary . documents are intended eto in 20 a This job total includes both direct and indirect 'obs. fgures expressed in 2005 resulting(induced)from expenditures associated with direct job creation.bhmeasure of secondary cry job creation AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 PAGE 20 n the Naird Of this income total, nearly $45 million in direct income would be created i come redeveloped Sub District 1-B ROFO parcels and over $35 million in indirect would be created in 2008 and thereafter. The corresponding increase in property values for the Harvest Partners ROFO parcels is forecast at nearly$53 million by 2008. ton is annual tax revenues by 2008 to the State of Washing The increase estimated atinrecurring$5.1 $3.88 millionthe aon innl time 1 $5.1 million. This is in addition to neary one-time etail aenearly redevelopment and absorption state revenues collected during arcels. space on the Harvest Partners ROFO p IV. RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFIT FINDINGS Renton of Harvest Partners redeveloping this excess The economic benefits to the City o f Boeing property in Sub District 1-B are now summarized: estimated that over 1,061 jobs would be created in the City of Renton By 2008, it is parcels in Sub District 1-B. alone from redeveloping these Harvest Partners ROFO p Of this job total, an estimated 859 direct jobs would be created in the redeveloped 2008. buildings and 202 indirect City jobs would be created by 0 Theo Renton is estimated to gain one-time revenues 1 B earlyl$667,000 during redevelopment of the Harvest Partners ROFO Sub District annual tax revenues of thereafter upon full build-out and absorption of the new The City is also forecast to rtherea an increasepin recurring nearly $856,000 in 2008 and retail space. jobs, income and summarizes these estimated benefits to the City in terms of new during development as well as Table 1 reflect nevel assumed as municipal revenues. recThurrine g benefits. For example,estimated duringthe generate over estimatesruh of annually e g aestimi ton tof the retaile shop 06 h 2008 development vperiod,and over $601,000 during are through $nd,big000 during space.ledevelopment and big box Sources for these municipal revenues are sales tax and real estate transfer taxes. PAGE 21 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 `her' Once the retail space is completed and absorbed (2008 estimate annually revenues are projected at nearly $856,000. Nearly $187,000 of this total will result City of Renton's share of property taxes. Annualaxes �' recurring tax is estimated to exceed $584,000. The City's employee head tax is generated from the retail space $58,000 each year and real estate transfer taxes are estimated at over $26,000 a nually. over $ 6,000 annually. Table 1 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFITS HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PARCELS HARVEST PARTNERS SUB DISTRICT 1-B One-time Land One-time Building Recurrin Development Development 2006-2007 g Redevelopment Scenario CITY JOBS in 2008 Direct Jobs 42 Indirect Jobs 16 Total Jobs 92 859 ANNUAL INCOME 58 39 202 Direct Income 131 1,061 Niftier Indirect Income $ 2,121,030 $ $ 678,445 $ 707 $ 8,889,439 9,432,720 $ 44,657,600 Total Income 3,384, CITY TAX REVENUES $ 2 799,475 $ Property Tax 12,817,427 $ 53,547,039 Sales Tax Employee Head Tax $ 66,379 $ $ 186,873 295,201 $ 584,225 Real Estate Transfer Tax Total Tax Revenues $ $ 58,346 306,257 $ 26,325 $ 601,458 $ 855,769 Chart 1 shows that 1,061 permanent jobs are estimated to be created wit Renton. Of these, 859 would be direct on-site jobs in the City of Renton within the City of n estimated 202 additional indirect off-site jobs in the City. This assumes that the indirect jobs created occur within the City of Renton. This � resulting in an one such quarter jr s without the redevelopment of the Harvest Partners ROFO property in Boei g'ares to no Renton jobs District 1-B area. Boeing's Sub Chart 1 Now AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 PAGE 22 NS City of Renton Permanent Jobs Created In 2008 800 400 Without Project With Project illustrates of that these jobs will generate new annual income o ecwithints both the inCity off-siteRenton Chart 2 datn. This income s estimated at nearly $54 ome°reat on in 2008 and thereafter. well as direct on-site me Chart 2 New Job Annual Income in 2008 $60 $54 $40 0 A o y C ° $20 $ Without Project With Project values of redeveloping the Chart 3 shows the increases in City of Renton property in 2008,Harvest the partners ROFO parcels in Sub-District a After evfrom $8.6 million to nearly $61.3 assessed value of these parcels is esti million—an increase of$52.7 million. PAGE 23 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 w Chart 3 PROPERTY VALUE INCREASES BY 2008 REDEVELOPMENT OF HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PROPERTY Without Project $8.6 With Project $61.3 $0 $25 $50 $75 Dollars in millions Chart 4 shows that the City of Renton will accrue one-time tax revenues from sales estate transfer taxes of nearly$668,000 during the estimated 2006 through 2007 development and real period. In addition, the City is forecast to increasingly receive annuallyrecurring revenues from redevelopment of the Harvest Partners ROFO portion of Boeing'sSub District 1-B property starting in 2007. This will increase until tax peRenton Sub $856,000 as an ongoing annual cash flow to the City. 2008 Where it peaks at nearly Chart 4 Nvoise AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 PAGE 24 New City Of Renton Tax Revenues ------ ------ $1,000,000 ----- y $800,000 Recurring a _ r $600,000 - /Onetime H $400,000 1111 ■ U $200,000 ■ ■ ■ n $' 2012 2013 2008 2009 2010 2011 PAGE 25 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 4 Table 1 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFITS FOUR BOEING DEVELOPMENT PARCELS BOEING RENTON SUB DISTRICT 1-B PROPERTY One-time Land One-time Building Recurring Redevelopment Scenario Development Development 2008-2012 in 2013 CITY JOBS Direct Jobs 25 381 1,700 Indirect Jobs 9 159 400 Total Jobs 34 540 2,100 ANNUAL INCOME Direct Income $ 1,285,625 $ 49,960,680 $ 123,146,400 Indirect Income $ 411,248 $ 34,962,754 $ 17,596,700 Total Income $ 1,696,873 $ 84,923,434 $ 140,743,100 CITY TAX REVENUES Property Tax $ 1,952,593 Sales Tax $ 40,234 $ 3,049,318 $ - Employee Head Tax $ 115,496 Real Estate Transfer Tax $ 3,118,965 $ 275,071 Total Tax Revenues $ 40,234 $ 6,168,283 $ 2,343,160 HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PARCELS Nirriv BOEING RENTON SUB DISTRICT 1-B PROPERTY One-time Land One-time Building Recurring Redevelopment Scenario Development Development 2006-2007 in 2008 CITY JOBS Direct Jobs 42 92 859 Indirect Jobs 16 39 202 Total Jobs 58 131 1,061 ANNUAL INCOME Direct Income $ 2,121,030 $ 9,432,720 $ 44,657,600 Indirect Income $ 678,445 $ 3,384,707 $ 8,889,439 Total Income $ 2,799,475 $ 12,817,427 $ 53,547,039 CITY TAX REVENUES Property Tax $ 186,873 Sales Tax $ 66,379 $ 295,201 $ 584,225 Employee Head Tax $ 58,346 Real Estate Transfer Tax $ 306,257 $ 26,325 Total Tax Revenues $ 66,379 $ 601,458 $ 855,769 lillime AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 26 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 • a COMBINED ECONOMIC BENEFITS HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PARCELS & BOEING DEVELOPMENT PARCELS BOEING RENTON SUB DISTRICT 1-B PROPERTY One-time Land One-time Building Recurring Redevelopment Scenario Development Development 2006-2012 in 2013 CITY JOBS Direct Jobs 67 473 2,559 Indirect Jobs 25 198 602 Total Jobs 92 671 3,161 ANNUAL INCOME Direct Income $ 3,406,655 $ 59,393,400 $ 167,804,000 Indirect Income $ 1,089,693 $ 38,347,461 $ 26,486,139 Total Income $ 4,496,348 $ 97,740,861 $ 194,290,139 CITY TAX REVENUES Property Tax $ 2,139,466 Sales Tax $ 106,613 $ 3,344,519 $ 584,225 Employee Head Tax $ 173,842 Real Es tate Transfer Tax $ 3,425,222 $ 301,396 Total Tax Revenues $ 106,613 $ 6,769,741 $ 3,198,929 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 27 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 TOTAL CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFITS BOEING & HARVEST PARTNERS PARCELS COMBINED DEVELOPMENT IN SUB DISTRICT 1-B City of Renton Permanent Jobs Created In 2013 4,000 _ 3,161 3,000 2,000 1,000 - - With Project Without Project New Job Annual Income in 2013 $200 $194 e $150 ppA G o $100 0 $50 - $- W ith Project Without Project New City Of Renton Tax Revenues $4,000,000 - $3,000,000 Ei Recurring 0.4 $2,000,000 E✓ ■Onetime 4' $1,000,000 - U $- MINI I I I I I 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 �Wrrr' AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 28 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 EXHIBIT 4 ECONOMIC BENEFIT STUDY, 2008 SUPPLEMENT SUB DISTRICT 1-B, NORTH 1B COMPONENT BOEING DEVELOPMENT PARCELS RENTON, WASHINGTON This Economic Benefit Study (Exhibit 4)was prepared to help align, support and provide context for recent land use amendments applicable to Sub-District 1-B as reflected in the attached Conceptual Redevelopment Plan. The analysis included in this Exhibit 4 was developed by CB Richard Ellis in an effort to conform to prior analyses performed for the Lakeshore Sub District 1-B. CB Richard Ellis obtained the information contained herein from sources we believe to be reliable. However, we have not verified its accuracy and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is submitted subject to the possibility of errors, omissions, and change of conditions. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future performance of the property. AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 29 03003-0105/LEGAL14505979.7 9/11/08 • EXHIBIT 4 ECONOMIC BENEFIT STUDY, 2008 SUPPLEMENT SUB DISTRICT 1-B, NORTH 1B COMPONENT BOEING DEVELOPMENT PARCELS RENTON, WASHINGTON I. HISTORY The original Conceptual Plan for Sub-District 1-B ("SD1B"), approved by the City of Renton, included a mix of multi-family and retail development. Over the past two years, however, the Puget Sound real estate market has changed. Highest and best use for the north 21.2 acres of SD 1 B (referenced by the original Plan as the "ROFO" area; now referenced as "North 1B"), has shifted away from retail and multifamily to office/commercial and hotel uses. The redevelopment now anticipated for North 1B includes a hotel and restaurants on 141.0. Lot 7B and office/business/R&D uses on Lot 5A. This analysis supplements the Economic Benefit Analysis performed in 2005 to support the original Conceptual Plan for SD IB by generally assessing the economic benefit associated with redevelopment of North 1B for office and hotel uses. As discussed in greater detail below, we conclude that the anticipated hotel and office redevelopment of SD 1 B will benefit the City, County and State at a rate equal to or greater than the retail redevelopment program assumed by the original Conceptual Plan. II. SCOPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HOTEL/RESTAURANT Lot 7B is approximately 5.07 acres. On the south side of N 8th Street, the property is bordered by Park and Garden Avenues North. The parcel is currently subject to a purchase and sale agreement with a regional hotel management and development company with more than 20 years of experience in the Pacific Northwest.. A hotel and commercial development is planned according to the following program: ➢ Residence Inn by Marriott; "Extended Stay" ➢ 170 rooms ➢ 130,000 sq. ft ➢ Total employees—approximately 45 to 50 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 30 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 o I ➢ Average Daily Rate (ADR)—approximately $165 ➢ Annual beginning revenue of approximately $8,500,000 ➢ Completion is projected in early 2010 ➢ 2 restaurant pads ➢ 2 "sit down" style restaurants; one approximately 5,000 sq. ft., the second approximately 8,000 sq. ft. ➢ Total employees for both restaurants—approximately 100 ➢ Annual beginning revenue of approximately $3,500,000 (for both restaurants) ➢ Completion is projected in early 2010 The combined value of the hotel and restaurant development is projected to exceed $42 million(land+ construction). OFFICE Lot 5A is approximately 14.21 acres. On the south side of N 8th Street, the property is bordered by Logan and Park Avenues North. The parcel is currently subject to a purchase and sale agreement with one of the largest publicly traded office and industrial property developers in the United States. An office/business/R&D development is planned according to the following program: ➢ Class "A" office project for general office use ➢ 4 buildings @+/- 150,000 sq. ft each; total office of 300k to 600k sq. ft. ➢ Project to be 100%built out by 2014 ➢ 2,000 to 3,000 employees/jobs ➢ Parking is planned to be a combination of structural and surface, based on the ultimate size of the office buildings ➢ Construction is projected to start in 2009 with completion of the initial phase in 2010 The combined value of the office development is projected to exceed $165 million (land + construction). III. ANALYSIS The 2005 Economic Benefit Study addressed and quantified the original Conceptual Plan's positive effect on jobs, annual income and city tax revenues. That analysis continues to be relevant to Scenarios 1 and 3 of the Amended Conceptual Plan now proposed. With respect to Scenario 2, which assumes redevelopment of the North lB portion of Sub-District lB for office/business/R&D/hotel/commercial uses as described above, we conclude the following: AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 31 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 • $ 4 • Proposed sit-down restaurants and hospitality components complement the current �...• retail development at The Landing. Proposed additional hotel lodging near the downtown core encourages revenue generating traffic and a tourism multiplier that will be beneficial to the City. • Washington state sales tax on the improvements and excise tax on the sale of the land should exceed $15 million. Using an industry standard of 200 square feet for each employee, the office portion should directly bring 3,000 jobs to Renton in additions to the 150 jobs created by the hotel and restaurants. • While there are many variables, we conclude that the current/revised conceptual plan for SD 1 B essentially substitutes some hotel and restaurant development for retail and multi-family uses and continues to provide similar economic benefits to those anticipated as part of the original conceptual plan. Proposed changes to the original Conceptual Plan provide for an increasingly diverse redevelopment of downtown Renton. A new hotel, restaurants, retail space and additional class A office space will continue to draw people to the downtown area. The city, county and state will continue to benefit via additional jobs, increased property values and public revenues. AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 32 03003-0105/LEGAL 14505979.7 9/11/08 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL 17AI#: 0 de ' Submitting Data: Community & Economic For Agenda of: Development Department October 6, 2008 Dept/Div/Board.. Planning Division Staff Contact Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. "Welcome to Renton, Home of the Seattle Seahawks" Correspondence.. Sign Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper with Attachments and Draft Consultant Study Sessions Agreement Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Community Services Committee Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: $39,083.00 Expenditure Required... $39,083.00 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. litiveSUMMARY OF ACTION: Authorization for the fabrication and installation of a "Welcome to Renton, Home of the Seattle Seahawks" sign. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize contracting with TubeArt for the fabrication and installation of a "Welcome to Renton, Home of the Seattle Seahawks" sign at the southwest corner of Lake Washington Boulevard North where it intersects with the southerly terminus of Seahawks Way/Ripley Lane North. Funds for this project will come from the $500,000.00 of Fund 317 money set aside for the Ripley Lane improvement project. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh rik 08. �� COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC . . DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Art, MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2008 TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: - ' Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner(Ext. 7382) SUBJECT: "Welcome to Renton, Home of the Seattle Seahawks"Sign ISSUE: Should the City of Renton install a"Welcome to Renton, Home of the Seattle Seahawks" monument sign on Lake Washington Boulevard North in the vicinity of Exit 7 of the I- 405 Freeway? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the fabrication and installation of a "Welcome to Renton, Home of the Seattle Seahawks"sign on City-owned property at the southwest corner of Lake Washington Boulevard North where it intersects with the southerly terminus of Seahawks Way/Ripley Lane North (Attachment A). The sign would be visible to drivers leaving the I-405 Freeway at Exit 7 (NE 44th Street) as well as those traveling on Lake Washington Boulevard North. BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Virginia Mason Athletic Center/Seattle Seahawks Headquarters and Training facility was officially occupied by the Seattle Seahawks on August 18, 2008. This state-of-the- art facility is a noteworthy addition to the City of Renton. Its location on the scenic shore of Lake Washington has garnered considerable positive public attention. In addition to announcing to motorists and others that they are travelling in Renton, a "Welcome to Renton, Home of the Seattle Seahawks"sign, in proximity to the Seahawks Headquarters, would clearly promote that this professional athletic organization is an identifiably prominent member of the Renton community. h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev&plan.ing\gw\welcome to renton sign\welcome sign issue paper a.doc Welcome to Renton Sign Page 2 of 2 September 8,2008 Nod In compliance with City Policy&Procedures regarding Biddingas and Contrab c and g Requirements, Community&Economic Development sta ffselected a sign design(Attachment B) from TubeArt, a respected Puget Sound area sign company. A cost proposal has been submitted by TubeArt (Attachment C) in the amount of$35,583.00 which includes fabrication and installation. Including sales tax this amount would be approximately$39,083. City funds for the "Welcome to Renton,Home of the Seattle Seahawks" sign were identified as part of the $500,000.00 allocation for Ripley Lane improvements. Budgeting for these improvements is through the Public Works Department, Transportation Division. nd The selected sign location would involve site preparation including he be imprequorts i on Staff of compaction of fill material. Less than 500 cubic yardsof fill would ment both the Community&Economic Development Depat and Public Works Department are currently working together identify o solutionose preparation. CONCLUSION: The Community&Economic Development Department nd installation ofaests authorization to SWelcome to Renton, contract with TubeArt for the fabrication a Home of the Seattle Seahawks" sign. Attachments cc: Denis Law,Mayor Members of the Renton City Council Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Iwen Wang,Finance and Information Services Administrator Nancy Carlson,Human Resources&Risk Management Administrator Terry Higashiyama,Community Services Administrator Gregg Zimmerman,PW Administrator Peter Hahn,Deputy PW Administrator-Transportation Bob Hanson,Design/Planning Program Supervisor h:\divisions\develop.ser\dev&plan.ing\gw\welcome to renton sign\welcome sign issue paper a.doc A4cA t-1-- x Welcome Si 3 3 1--.',,,,:;,:,..',7.., 7 Fri fi ,\ -A, .P �� t 3' "x ''' 5 f� Potential ,::;,,,,;',;',7:':---„‘, -, L4 avt ,r xa ,� � � q. its Location t' •,. . \ e, h '1' - ,•,•;.-,',`4,, z # '^'VSs �\ , �� a ms- \" / y, i-iY„ � ` Yap "5'''''. ' , .,;',.:`,.:t: ;e- ,f;i'‘iii!''' \*-''‘.,-..'"1!:, / , \''' ,-,.-vki# t�s�e �ra � �. + �' �' ,�;,.,ft,a v , , ter" ''''''..''''',.'.`-Y) k i '?,‘: = , s F. 4 a t 4 ' . i �� tar \` Nt -�S r...4a S in P �;. '�-Tva c` § ,�„‘„,,,,,.„...„;.:-;1,,. x .-.-_-=‘,..'-: ,,,„ ,y �, i, .;; s, �..•,-.7•<.-i.:4•.•`<' a "F '.,:v r�^y`' x '`, x "�:' ._' n, . . .,�:� ^'rd� fi�,ft t,�4 5, , .•‘,..1.4,.;;..„:,‘,4...:,„• Z 'gyp � R .- �g';. . ' f bf, fr 1 q- L. ''';',1-..,-...„-,._:; o x, T.,-,...,..;,'4.1L �e .' aFP : ' "t Mia ., ,‘,, - , ,,. .., , ,41,..;,,,, ,,,,,,,..,4_, ' � its :fir;•.;,'' may R r , TubeArt luchluctural 8 Electrical Displays 1705 4th Ave.S.End Floor Seattle, WA 08134 TEL 20t-523.1122 USA 1.600.562.2854 FAX 206-223-1123 This original 111orork 4 protected under Federal Copyright Lawn. Make no reproduction of this design concept without pemesswn 8' 1 1/4" 8•_0' irom7ubeArt © If 1/41 4' L T'-9" Ii - - .,...__.. � 8660 CUSTOMER NUMBER WELCOME TO ;'�°�,°E RUNeER RENTON dkffKelmy el t ielo FILE MANE Joe 90 SALE5RE11SOR "" -Q�' Garton Mattlmee ORAWe 1Y I .. HOME OF THE CHECKED SY I I o 0.4 SEATTLE Juno 02,2008 DATE 4I SEAHAWKS , REVISIONS Q I I AeN Side View Elevation—Single face monument sign I I Append with chows awe OScale:3/4'=1'-0' �Scale:3/4"=1'-0" SALESPERSON SIO3ATORE CUSTOMER SIGNATURE Manufacture and Install one(1)single face non-Illuminated monument sign. DATE ®Concrete monument with integrated White color.'WELCOME TO RENTON'copy to be sandblasted A N a f 0 a 0 S I G N A,D R E (.------s and initiled with Black paint. 0 Al ©Lower concrete section to be Integrated'Seahawks Blue'color'HOME OF THE/SEATTLE SEAHAWKS'letters to be 1/4'White aluminum pin mounted flush to concrete surface. ©Logo:White oulllnarbacker panel to be 1/4'White aluminum pin mounted flush to concrete City surface.Graphic elements to be 1/8'aluminum painted per logo color criteria and flush mounted Of to White outline/backer panel. ..k....., All elements of sign needs to be able to be cleaned of graffiti and vandal proofed, Renton Concrete pad/ooting and external lighting by others, Washington cewddA9 1 1 e6ec44 onwn 1t/f1 U1' (A.,,. A-Rac..14,4V1 L �� TUWArt Proposal Em ironmental and Architecnowl Sign Division 1705 Fourth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98134-1333 July 18th 2008 Gerald Wasser The City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 By: Jeff Kehm Re: City of Renton Sign Proposal Jerry, On behalf of TubeArt Displays, I am pleased to present my proposal to fabricate and install the monument sign as shown in the provided design. The below prices do not include permits or permit acquisition for the City of Renton. Ground prep and power is not included in the below bid. My pricing is as follows: Sign Type 4'-0" x 8'-0" S/F Monument Sign Price Now - Concrete formwork, footing, rebar, integrated "Blue" paint in concrete base and excavation $33,840.00 -Waterjet cut "Seahawks" copy and logo .25" $1,055.00 aluminum surface mounted with pin supports. - Installation of the pin mounted aluminum graphics $688.00 $35,583.00.plus.tax, plus pemits/acquisition Quoted prices are valid for 30 days and are subject to the following terms: Prices quoted do not include state and local sales taxes and/or taxes/fees for necessary permits and engineering drawings. All installation hours are quoted as"Standard"hours—Monday through Friday;between 6 am and 6 pm(excluding set TubeArt holidays.) Any installation outside these"Standard" hours,require overtime rates. Unless otherwise agreed,terms are 50%at the time of the order and balance due at the time of installation. Purchase price does include installation and delivery.Prices quoted do not include the costs of running electrical circuit wiring to the display(s). The PURCHASER shall be responsible for the costs of,and the installation of,electrical circuit wiring to the displays and the power costs necessary to operate the proposed displays or lighting.SELLER will only make electrical connections to circuits that meet National Electrical Code specifications.The electrical circuit must be in place within 5'0"of the sign placement and must have unobstructed accessibility at the time the sign is installed.The electrical circuit for the sign display must not supply any other load and must have a solid ground path.Electrical circuits not meeting the above criteria will require connection by others.All signs are manufactured to operate on 110 voltage power,unless otherwise specified. Prices for concrete bases are calculated on 3000 P.S.I.and normal soil conditions. Any alteration from specifications must be in writing,and prices will be adjusted accordingly.Prices are based on the costs and conditions existing as of this date and are subject to change prior to final acceptance by an officer of Seller.The above-specified display shall remain the property of Seller until Seller receives final payment of purchase price. Seller shall not be responsible for delays in completion of order caused by strikes,accidents,or unforeseen commercial delays,or damages,losses,claims,costs or liabilities,whether direct or indirect,arising from the inability of computer hardware or software systems to recognize a year that begins with"20"rather than"19"(the Year 2000 problem),or other causes beyond its control. All sales are subject to the Sellers'Sale Agreement Terms and Conditions,as provided on the reverse of this Proposal. Please do not compromise our proprietary interest in the designs and concepts in our proposals by showing these to anyone outside ofyour office. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and/or by facsimile. Thank you for providing TubeArt the opportunity to present this proposal to you. Wow Purchaser's Acceptance Date Accepted by TubeArt Date CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I AI#: Submitting �o Now- Data: For Agenda of: October 6, 2008 Dept/Div/Board.. CED Staff Contact Alex Pietsch (x 6592) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Establishment of a Housing Opportunity Fund Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Ordinance Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Community Services Committee Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment $200,000 Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: In order to help increase the supply of affordable housing in Renton b transferring $200,000 of unallocated General Fund (Account # 000.000000.000.3990.0000.00.00000) ) to establish a Housing Opportunity Fund (HOF) (Account # 326.000000.000.3970.0059.00.000000). Funds will be used to assist public and private housing projects serving low and/or moderate income households and/or special-needs populations within the City limits. Individual requests for funding from the HOF will be brought forward to the City Council for approval after staff review and recommendation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although Renton's housing stock continues to be lower-priced on average than Seattle, Bellevue, and King County as a whole, housing price inflation in general and the rising cost of housing in particular are making it increasingly difficult for Renton residents and employees to find affordable housing in the community. By establishing the Housing Opportunity Fund, the City will be increasing the opportunities for affordable housing for people with low and moderate incomes and/or special needs in our community - and supporting the City's vision as the center of opportunity in the Puget Sound region where businesses and families (of all income levels) thrive. C:\DOCUME_l\BWalton\LOCALS—l\Temp\Housing Opportunity Fund agenda bill 9-11-08.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON Niaof ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF RENTON FISCAL YEAR 2008 ANNUAL BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE AND TRANSFER $200,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND (000) TO THE NEWLY CREATED HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND (326). WHEREAS, on December 10, 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5325 approving the 2008 Annual Budget; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the City of Renton Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Budget to create a new Housing Opportunity Fund 326 to be allocated in the following manner: HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND — PROPOSED PROJECT ELIGIBILITY AND USES OF FUNDS Projects must be physically located within the Renton city limits Now Projects must serve low and/or moderate income households and/or special-needs populations as follows: • Projects may include home ownership opportunities for first-time home buyers at 80% or less of the median income or rental housing for households at 60% or less of the median income. • First priority — New construction projects to increase the available supply of affordable housing in Renton with a preference for mixed-income projects. • Second priority — Acquisition and/or rehabilitation of existing multi-family structures to increase or the availability of supply of affordable housing in Renton. • Third priority— Rehabilitation or remodeling of existing multi-family housing for low income households to maintain the facility as decent, safe, and sanitary. • Multi-family housing project owners must agree to maintain housing as affordable for a minimum of ten years. • Funds may be used, for example, for seed money, local match, land acquisition, development costs, construction costs, etc. • The City will strive to maximize leverage for other public and private funds with a minimum projected $1 to $1 match and preferred projected match of 1-to-4 ($1 of City funds for each $4 of projected other funds). • Projects will have up to three years to use the funds. tow 1 ORDINANCE NO. HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND — PROPOSED SELECTION AND APPROVAL PROCESS FOR AWARDING FUNDS • Interested parties may submit an application to request funds at any time to the Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator. • The Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator will review the application in collaboration with an interdepartmental team and prepare a recommendation to the City Council for approval. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The Fiscal Year 2008 Annual Budget is hereby amended to include the new Housing Opportunity Fund. Said fund shall be the HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND (326). SECTION II. Appropriations in Fund 000 and Fund 326 are hereby changed as follows: 2008 Adjusted Fund 2008 Budget Budget Change Budget 000.000000.000.3990.0000.00.000000 $1,392,361 $200,000 $1,592,361 000.000000.000.5970.0059.00.000000 $0 $200,000 $200,000 • 326.000000.000.3970.0059.00.000000 $0 $200,000 $200,000 326.000000.000.5080.0000.00.000000 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Source of Funds: Transfer from General Fund 000 to CIP Fund 326 SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk 2 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1504:9/18/08:scr Nasaw 3 • CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL P,o, Submitting Data: For Agenda of: October 6, 2008 Dept/Div/Board: Community Services/Facilities Staff Contact: Peter Renner, Facilities Director Agenda Status Ext. 6605 Consent X Subject: Public Hearing. Lease Agreement with King County for stationing of a Correspondence. paramedic unit at Fire Station 12. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Lease Information Resolution Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept X Finance Dept.... X Risk Management X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated $28,800 over the two-year lease Total Project Budget term. City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Changes in the Fire and Emergency Services Department of the City necessitate the relocation of the Medic One unit from FS 14 to FS 12. While exact comparables are difficult to obtain, lease terms were derived from research done by our real estate team. The lease is market based as far as the space itself is concerned, but makes allowances for the proprietary services that Medic One provides by not charging for utilities or the shared use of additional office, kitchen, dining, exercise and locker room space. It is roughly $400 per month more than the lease terms at FS 14. The lease also provides for King County to pay for accommodating one-time changes and an annual escalation based on the CPI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Lease with King County for space at Fire Station 12, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Lease and authorize the Mayor, City Clerk, and City Attorney to sign the accompanying Resolution renewing the interlocal cooperative agreement between the City and King County to lease space to King County Emergency Medical Services Division. CADOCUME-1\BWalton\LOCALS-1\Temp\AgBillMedicOnev2.doc 9/30/2008 1:22:49 PM �SY Nture 42 C. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT seP �. MEMORANDUM DATE: September 24, 2008 TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayo FROM: Terry Higashiyama Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Peter Renner, Facilities Director, Ext. 6605 SUBJECT: Lease with King County at Fire Station 12 Issue: Should the Council authorize the Mayor and the.City Clerk to sign a Lease with King County and the associated Resolution for space at Fire Station 12 to accommodate a Medic One unit? Recommendation: Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Lease and Council authorize the Mayor, City Clerk, and City Attorney to sign the associated Resolution. Background: • The King County Emergency Medical Services Division provides a paramedic unit to the City of Renton. • Reorganization of the Fire and Emergency Services Department and relocation of equipment and personnel requires the relocation of the Medic One unit from Fire Station 14 to Fire Station 12. • The relocation is consistent with quality standards for paramedic response contained in the King County Emergency Medical Services Master Plan. • The lease includes the following business points: o The Lease is a two-year contract with a CPI adjustment after the first year. o The County will pay for all modifications associated with this move. o There are mutual 90-day cancellation options for limited causes. o The new lease is roughly $400 per month more than the previous lease. However, lease rates for the garage space and the other spaces occupied are at the low end of any market comparables and the County will not be charged for utility and other operating costs, or for shared space such as the kitchen, exercise room, or locker rooms. This type of concession is commonly made in other municipalities in recognition of the proprietary services provided by Medic One. som►' o Revenue generated over the term of the lease would total at least $28,800.00. City of Renton Memorandum Lease with King County September 24,2008 Page 2 of 2 Conclusion: This lease provides the City with sufficient revenue to cover the expense of the additional facility expenses that will be required for Fire Station 12 and provides for continuous paramedic services that are provided by Medic One. Attachment cc: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Iwen Wang,Finance&IS Administrator I.David Daniels,Fire and Emergency Services Chief Larry Warren,City Attorney Bonnie Walton,City Clerk 'rr H:\Peter Renner\Peter Renner 2008\InfoPaperFS 12MedicOne.doc 9/24/2008 10:46:29 AM INTER-AGENCY LEASE AGREEMENT view' This LEASE AGREEMENT is entered into this THE CITY OF RENTON as LESSOR, hereinafter referred to s "CITY," and KINGbetween COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as LESSEE, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the CITY and COUNTY both desire to enter into a certain Lease Agreement for the use of appropriate square footage of space at the fire station located at 1209 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton, WA, hereinafter referred to as the "FACILITY," for the stationing of a paramedic unit operated by the King County Emergency Medical Services Division. WHEREAS, the King County Emergency Medical Services Master Plan and its associated location analysis have demonstrated that the fire station at the above address provides quality paramedic response into the greater Renton and Maple Valley area. WHEREAS, the CITY desires to utilize King County's Emergency Medical Services Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1• DESCRIPTION OF LEASED PREMISES: I• Leased Space— 1209 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton, WA a. 1588 total square feet— See EXHIBIT C attached hereto and made a part hereof Comprises: i. 1200 square feet—Garage space inside the apparatus bay for one (1) primary paramedic vehicle and one (1) spare medic vehicle. ii. 170 square feet— Sleeping quarters consisting of two (2) 8'6"x 10' sleeping rooms with two (2) beds. The sleeping quarters include eight (8) built-in lockers with twenty-four (24) drawers available for use by the COUNTY. Each bed includes mattress, mattress pad, bedspread and two (2) blankets. iii. 90 square feet of Office space iv. 128 square feet of secure EMS storage. 1 II. Space Shared by the CITY and the COUNTY a. Bathroom/shower facilities for both sexes shared with Renton Fire Department personnel; Office space including a desk and chair; b. Kitchen facilities, dining and day rooms shared with Renton Fire Department personnel; c. Exercise room and equipment shared with Renton Fire Department personnel. 2. GENERAL SERVICES OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED BY THE CITY Basic Services a. Heating and Lighting—Heating, lighting and cooling will be provided by the CITY for the FACILITY and those services will be available on a 24- hour basis. b. Standby Power—The FACILITY will have an emergency generator available to provide backup power to the building. c. Waste—The CITY will provide a waste receptacle all be recd collection e for disposal for all waste; EXCEPT that the COUNTY responsible of all contaminated medical waste. d. Storage Space—The CITY will provide storage space for limited storage `4110? of"non-controlled" operational supplies. The COUNTY shall provide shelving for storage of"non-controlled" operational supplies. 3. GENERAL SERVICES OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED BY KING COUNTY General Services a. Paramedic Unit—The COUNTY will station a paramedic unit staffed with two (2)paramedics in the FACILITY. b. Security—The COUNTY agrees to maintain all agreeduponmethods of es, including controlled substances, undermutually security and accessible only by COUNTY personnel. c. Maintenance—The COUNTY agrees to require all COUNTY personnel assigned to the FACILITY to participate in the daily, weekly housekeeping duties and other periodic cleaning of the FACILITY (building and grounds) in cooperation with Renton Fire Department personnel. d. Special Conditions—The COUNTY further agrees that any problems or ve issues that arise involving personnel or agreement,l ,140#agencies will be handled as set forth in EXHIBIT A of this attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2 4. RENT 14140, The COUNTY agrees to pay the CITY $1,200 per month, effective January 1, 2008, for space and other systems and services described in Item 1 above. The monthly rate will be adjusted annually based upon the increase in the Consumer Price Index for Seattle and shall become effective the first day of January for each subsequent year of this lease. 5. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS The CITY recognizes that this agreement entails moving the paramedic unit from its existing quarters at Fire Station 14 to Fire Station 12. The CITY also recognizes that the move may not be completed by January 1, 2008. Therefore, it is mutually agreed between the CITY and COUNTY, the move of the paramedic unit from its existing quarters at Fire Station 14 to Fire Station 12 will be completed.no later than _ , 2008. II. The COUNTY agrees to pay all costs incurred in modifying the FACILITY to meet the COUNTY'S needs, including but not limited to, alarm notification lighting equipment, telephone and computer systems, and security (locks) systems. a. All such modifications shall be made by the CITY with the prior written approval of the King County Emergency Medical Services Division Manager and shall be consistent with the FACILITY'S standards as determined by the CITY. Signatures of both parties are required upon completion of the improvements to show that all improvements have been completed to the satisfaction of both parties. b. Payment for the identified modifications shall be in addition to monthly payments provided for herein. Any additional costs for changes to the original plan will require prior approval by the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall make all payments within 30 days of receipt of an invoice. c. Any tenant improvements made subsequent to this agreement shall be made by or with the approval of the CITY with the prior written approval of the King County Emergency Medical Services Division Manager and shall be entered as an Exhibit to this agreement. d. The COUNTY agrees to reimburse the CITY for all direct and indirect costs incurred by the CITY for repair and replacement of CITY property which is lost, destroyed or damaged (normal wear and tear excepted)to the extent such loss, destruction, or damage is caused by equipment or employees of the COUNTY. e. The COUNTY agrees, at the termination of this agreement, to restore the Nkile FACILITY to the high quality condition it was in originally. This will include removing tenant improvements, refinishing walls, ceilings, replacing carpet, restoring the alarm system, etc. 3 6. TERM This Lease Agreement is for two (2) years beginning January 1, 2008 and expires December 31, 2009. This agreement may be terminated annually for lack of funding. II. Termination for other causes: a. This Agreement is subject to termination upon ninety (90) days written notice by the COUNTY should: i. The CITY fail to comply with the terms and conditions expressed herein. ii. The CITY fail to provide work or services expressed herein. b. This Agreement is subject to termination upon ninety (90) days written notice by the CITY should: i. The COUNTY fail to comply with the terms and conditions expressed herein. ii. If, in the judgment of the Administrator of the CITY OF RENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, or his/her designee,the relationship is no longer compatible with the organizational philosophy or values of the Fire Department as provided in the attached EXHIBIT B, Standard Operating Procedures 1101, Organizational Philosophy. III. Changes: Either party may request changes in the services to be performed or provided hereunder. Proposed changes, which are mutually agreed upon, shall be incorporated by written amendment to this agreement signed by both parties. 7. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION: The COUNTY agrees to assume responsibility toccur and to ssr e in any way out of occupancy of the rented space at the FACILITY, ave and hold harmless the CITY, its employees and officials, from all claims, causes of action, costs, expenses, losses and damages, including the cost of defense, incurred as a result of any negligent acts or omissions of the COUNTY, its agents, officers, or employees only arising out of or relating to the performance of this agreement. 4 II. The CITY agrees to assume responsibility for all liabilities that occur or arise in any way out of the performance of this agreement by its agents, officers, or employees, and to save and hold harmless the COUNTY, its employees and officials, from all claims, causes of actions, costs, expenses, losses and damages, including the cost of defense, incurred as a result of any negligent acts or omissions of the CITY, its agents, officers, or employees only arising out of or relating to the performance of this agreement. The COUNTY agrees to assume responsibility for all liabilities that occur or arise in any way out of the performance of this agreement by its agents, officers, or employees, and to save and hold harmless the CITY, its employees and officials, from all claims, causes of actions, costs, expenses, losses and damages, including the cost of defense, incurred as a result of any negligent acts or omissions of the COUNTY, its agents, officers, or employees only arising out of or relating to the performance of this agreement. The parties have negotiated that should an employee of one party sue the other, for the purposes of this indemnification only, that the employer entity waives the immunities of Title 51 RCW. 8. INSURANCE The CITY understands that the COUNTY is self-insured. The COUNTY will provide a Certificate of Insurance and a Statement of Coverage or an equivalent document prior to physically moving into Fire Station 12, as referenced. 9. NOTICES: Official notice under this lease shall be given as follows: To City: City of Renton Fire Department Renton City Hall — 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 To County: King County Real Property Division 500A Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Noire 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. LESSOR: CITY OF RENTON LESSEE: PUBLIC HEALTH, COUNTY B � � BY: Y: TITLE: Ma or TITLE: Division Manager Emprgency Medical Services DATE: � l�c)� DATE: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: / /j A.A..��,,� g�Es 9/���aff City of Renton Attorney DATE: DATE: BY: Manager ' eal Property Services Section DATE: cj /V Attest: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 6 Nr.r EXHIBIT A Special Conditions Interagency Cooperation a. The COUNTY agrees to designate one(1)paramedic on each duty shift who will coordinate the station activities and issues with the Station Officer, including but not limited to regular maintenance of the FACILITY by on-duty personnel. b. - The COUNTY agrees that when issues, conflicts or problems arise, the Station Officer and the designated COUNTY employee shall attempt to resolve the matter at their level. If the matter is unable to be resolved at that level it shall be taken to the next level of the respective chains of command, up to and including the Fire Chief, or his/her designee, for the CITY and the Manager of the King County Emergency Medical Services Division for the COUNTY. c. The COUNTY recognizes the importance of the organizational philosophy and Noise value of the CITY and agrees to cooperate with the CITY to support tho as expressed in Exhibit B, Standard Operating Procedures 1101 , se values Organizational Philosophy. The COUNTY further agrees to abide by all other pertinent Renton Fire Department Policies and Procedures as discussed and agreed to by the Fire Chief and Manager of the King County Emergency Medical Services Division. Date: Date: g Approved: Approved: Denis Law, Mayor City of Renton David Fleming, MD Director and Health Public Health Seattle & King Attest: County �.r BonnieTorn Hearne Division Manager I. Walton, City Clerk Emergency Medical Services • EXHIBIT B Renton Fire and Emergency Services Department Standard Operating Procedure Subject: Organizational Number: 1101 Philosophy Effective Date: March 1, 2008 Revised: 1.0 Statement of Policy 1.1. The Renton Fire and Emergency Services Department's mission, vision and values serve as its organizational philosophy and the guiding principles for how the Department will function. 1.2. The organizational philosophy shall be the foundation of all Department lines of business,programs, projects and activities. 1.3. Vision 1.3.1. The vision of the organization is focused on the intended outcome of the Department's work. 1.3.2. The vision focuses on the primary purpose for the existence of the Department that being the preparation and protection of the community for the natural and manmade risks associated with being a part of the community itself. 1.3.3. The organization's vision statement is, "Renton ... A City Uniquely Prepared, Effectively Protected' 1.4. Mission 1.4.1. The organization's mission is intended to be the vehicle by which the organization realizes its vision. 1.4.2. The organization's mission statement is, "To maintain a safe and livable city through: • The reduction of risks to our community, • The efficient and effective response to escalating emergencies, and • A culture of safety and support for our members. 1.5. Values 1.5.1. The organization's values are the principles upon which ma' decisions are made. dor 1.5.2. These values should serve as methods to evaluate the efficacy of organizational programs and activities. 1.5.3. The organization's values are: • There is no higher calling than that of service and protection to our community. • Nothing is of more value than human life and the safety of our members. • Trust is the foundation on which success is built. • Prevention, where possible, is preferred. • The reputation of the organization is paramount. • We can only do what we are trained, capable, equipped and prepared to do. • Competence is the ultimate measure of performance. • There is richness in the diversity of the community we serve and the organization of which we are a part. • To reach our full potential as an organization, our working environment must be open, accepting and courteous for all members. 1.6. Organizational Focus 1.6.1. Though members should ultimately strive to see that the organization fulfills its mission, they should do so within the scope of their assigned responsibilities in the organization. err 1.6.2. The concept of organizational focus is not intended to limit focus, but rather to prioritize focus based on the kind, type and level of focus. 1.6.3. Kinds of Focus 1.6.3.1. Philosophic - Focus on concepts and principles that guide why we do what we do. 1.6.3.2. Organizational — Focus on the structural elements and aspects of the Department that guide how we do what we do. 1.6.3.3. Performance — Focus on the organization's tangible results and guide what we do. 1.6.4. Types of Focus 1.6.4.1. Department - Focus on the organization as a whole including not only internal activities, but interaction with entities outside the organization. 1.6.4.2. Strategic — Focus on broad concepts that are primarily in the member's sphere of nfluence, but have broad application across the Department. 1.6.4.3. Tactical — Focus on methods of achieving strategies and are generally the lowest level that policies address. 1.6.4.4. Task — Focus on specifics, how work is doe e done or goals the are achieved and are limited by the comp person completing the task. 1.6.5. The Organizational Focus Matrix is displayed in Appendix 6.1 to show the interaction between types,kinds and levels of focus in the organization. 2.0 Objectives 2.1. The objective of the organizational philosophy is to clarify the tenets of guide to organizational decision the organization's culture and serve as a making. 3.0 Responsibility 3.1. Each member of the organization is responsible oy to fulfill aware trof the duties and making every P organizational philosophy in a manner consistent with that philosophy. 3.2. Primary Kind of Focus vari 3.2.1. Fire Chief: 4.0 Procedures - N/A 5.0 Reference - N/A 6.0 Appendix 6.1. Organizational Focus Matrix KIND OF FOCUS Philosophy Organization Department Performance Fire Chief Vision Department Core Services Strategic Mission Section Programs Dep. Chief E. M. Director Tactical Values BBatt. Chief Battalion/Division Projects Captain (40 hr) 111 Assist Fire Marshal Unit/Com an Company Officer p y Activities Lead Inspector Culture Supervisor Work Team Direct Service to Firefighter Customer Inspector Support Staff Exhibit C Floor Plan to be attached 13 ( EXHIBIT C ( ( MEDIC ..„.. „.......,_ di,= DORMS iEil 1 all I amod ' ',4,44,10 , C1:7111 or. • 0612 P:e NvqW. ,F r..4.,• 0 '4 0414'444 .011111111 ..... E• .* V : 0dt ,},,., 0 IA I ' .•Plil! r',g.,`4f4'14130,,re'a pm i Ai h. --...1 ,,,',4,iarn", 4,1Aot — = v.,,, 1,,,i,v ,,4 ':1 MgrZZI ,.,..,. ,,,,,,,,,.„,,v,,Re, MED J,',,,.,44,,,,,,;,0 '‘,1,,e„,,gtt,04,11.1" III --J SE • ir.11 0 rt.- Al fit ii,1 a FM gal 11 N11:14,F90,A, PARKING III — 4 • a 1 gi 41. t.pre, c • Et Ps v ,, L r•,,.,„, ,,A,' , .!1 1 iif 7 - „....11 I, - ii --4 NEEI,.. r... , 1. •; 711111 I ' , E,:;,!1.-.§rati C§P • _ —- 111 1 . E — : - E.illE:.. _ 01 • .,.... - II . -- —1 — m J..- 11111111111111 . -- .i.mieaum- 4;*44:: re: rm reIzett,l'1&, = LIvhlk-14 ',4,,„ "n• _____ MEDIC MEDIC 1 IA,'Z1.g-+4''''I PARKING 0 rgr g STORAGE l'6',,4,4144t s,:.'4,4 41.014 `4,•:41.4,4 _ ...,-.4.44.41...wit °1',4 ,,,14 NI; { III 17 44r,,11 ii4,''',,,,,,e' ,, ,,,,,,,.! . . 1411 gli,'01:4-e MEDIC 2„ 44 yr WORK - iiii 1-11' 45 L STATION , Ftki4" .1....4 4 ..„.....,,,, r,; i 2) ....... AI i.--, - ,... ,,Al I ,..,....,4 ....li; • FIRE STATION 12 & .. 1 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 1 1 Ig11813 1 PS I FIRST FLOORA -- 1,— ......, LEASED AREAS Shaded areas indicate leased space CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CRE NTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AK TO RENEW AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT SOO VICES LEASE SPACE TO KING COUNTY EMERGENCY DIVISION. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has a fire station located at 1509 Kirkland Avenue NE, in Renton, Washington; and WHEREAS, both the City and King County wish to station in that building a paramedic unit operated by the King County Emergency Medical Services Division; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the City of Renton will continue to rent such space to King County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement for leasing of space to the King County Emergency Medical Services Division for housing of a paramedic unit. , 2008. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 1 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2008. Aware Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.13 76:9/24/08:scr 2 I CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: io t* Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Parks Division October 6, 2008 Staff Contact Todd Black, ext. 6571 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing... Cedar River Bank Stabilization at Jones Park - Professional Correspondence.. Engineering Services Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Consultant Agreement Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required.../117 $97,000.00 Transfer/Amendment --- Amount Budgeted $300,000.00 Revenue Generated --- Total Project Budget $300,000.00 City Share Total Project.. $300,000.00 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Cedar River is undercutting the bank along Jones Park for approximately 120 feet just south of Wells Avenue. The river is habitat for the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon, an endangered species. Bank slope protection will be designed utilizing natural materials and requires very specialized expertise. Consultant services include design and permitting and consultation with applicable government agencies. The project will be advertised to bid in 2009, with a construction window from July 1 through August 31. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc., in the amount of$97,000.00 for professional engineering services for the Cedar River bank protection. ti 0" COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • • MEMORANDUM DATE: September 29, 2008 TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President City Council Members VIA: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrato rr� 21 STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Betlach, Parks Director(x-6619) Todd Black, Capital Project Coordinator(x-6571) SUBJECT: Cedar River Bank Protection—Agreement for Services ISSUE: Should the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Agreement for Services with BERGER/ABAM to provide professional engineering services for the design and environmental permits for construction of bank slope protection of the west bank of the Cedar River at Jones Park? low RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Agreement for Services with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc., in the amount of$97,000.00 for professional engineering services. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The Cedar River is undercutting the bank along Jones Park for approximately 120 feet just south of Wells Avenue. The river is habitat for the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon, an endangered species. Bank slope protection will be designed utilizing natural materials and requires very specialized expertise. Consultant services include design and permitting and consultation with applicable government agencies. The project will be advertised for bid in 2009, with a construction window from July 1 through August 31. CONCLUSION: Designing a natural shoreline will provide bank protection of the Cedar River along Jones Park, which is currently being undercut, and increase habitat for the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon, an endangered species. rommimmimmismiimommiommlogolow vtg 21 May 2008 Mr.Todd Black City of Renton Renton City Hall, Sixth Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Subject: Proposal for Professional Engineering Services Cedar River Bank Protection-Jones Park Dear Mr.Black: We are pleased to be given the opportunity to assist you in stabilizing the west bank of the Cedar River at Jones Park in the City of Renton. We understand that the City would like to implement the recommendations included in our conceptual study "Bank Slope Protection for the Cedar River at Jones Park" dated 25 May 2007. A description of our proposed scope, schedule, and fee follows. SCOPE OF SERVICES The existing slope protection is failing and the Cedar River is scouring and undercutting the bank for approximately 200 feet within Jones Park just south of Wells Avenue in the City of Renton. The Cedar River is habitat for the Puget Sound chinook salmon, an endangered species. Consequently,the repairs to the bank slope protection will be heavily influenced by the regulatory agencies,primarily Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, (WDFW). We propose to prepare the design and environmental permits for construction of bank slope protection of the west bank of the Cedar River at Jones Park in accordance with the recommendations described in the above-referenced study. BERGER/ABAM will employ Inter-Fluve Inc. as a subconsultant to design the bank slope protection. The Cedar River is a very important salmon-bearing stream in the Puget Sound region. Bank slope protection must be designed utilizing natural materials and requires very specialized expertise. Inter-Fluve has successfully designed a number of bank slope protection installations with natural materials. Mr. Todd Black 21 May 2008 Page 2 Inter-Fluve's scope of work will involve a site investigation to gather required data for the project design, a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, detailed design,and construction documents of the bank slope protection. The site investigation is estimated to last three days and will include characterization of bank and bed materials, assessment of site context,identify project access and staging options, and a ground survey to support hydraulic analysis and project design. The hydrologic analysis will include development of design flows for use in the project design and the hydraulic analysis will include development of a local design-level project hydraulic model using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE) one-dimensional steady state river hydraulic model, Hec-Ras. The design effort will include a preliminary design memorandum and detailed construction documents submitted for review at the 60 percent level of completion. We will prepare the final construction documents to the 100 percent level of completion after receipt of comments and a review meeting. A more detailed description of Inter-Fluve's scope is included in their attached proposal. Environmental studies and permits will be prepared by BERGER/ABAM. These will include shoreline program approval, SEPA Checklist,Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA), and a USACE nationwide permit. The USACE will review the project for consistency with the Endangered Species Act(ESA). As the project has the potential to affect ESA-listed species, a biologicalassessment(BA) will be required in order to assess potential impacts. Several agencies will review the BA and must agree with the determination of effect before the USACE will issue the nationwide permit. Once the nationwide permit has been issued, the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) will issue a water quality certification, (401 certification), as part of the nationwide permit process. Lastly, an HPA must be received from the WDFW as the project will occur below the ordinary high water mark of waters of the state. The tasks required to obtain the necessary permits include a site visit and consultation with the WDFW fisheries biologist, preparation of a BA,JARPA and Shorelines exemption applications, and a SEPA checklist. SCHEDULE We estimate that the above scope of work will take approximately 13 weeks from the notice to proceed as shown on the attached schedule. FEE ESTIMATE We propose to perform the work on a time-and-materials basis, with a not-to-exceed amount of $97,000(Ninety-Seven Thousand Dollars). Our detailed fee estimate and billing rates for engineering services are as shown on the attached Fee Estimate and BERGER/ABAM Standard Time and Expense Charges. We will not exceed the above authorized amount without your prior approval. 'fluor err , Mr.Todd Black 21 May 2008 Page 3 We look forward to working with you and with the City of Renton on this project. Please call me at 206/431-2300 if you should have any questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, Elmer W. Ozolin,PE Vice President EWO:dls Attachment BERGER/ABAM Staff Hour and Expense Summary BERGER/ABAM Billing Rates Inter-Fluve Proposal City of Renton - Community Services Cedar River Natural Bank Protection Nowire BERGER/ABAM EN_GI NE ESS INC BERGER/ABAM-STAFF HOUR SUMMARY Date:16 May 2008 Project I Senior I Senior I Assoc. I Tech/ Manager Planner Scientist Planner Drafter Admin/WP Item $154.35 $132.46 $107.25 $72.14 $88.27 Contract Administration $ss.ss Totals Contract Administration 8 4 $1,473.40 Invoicing 8 $1,234.80 Project Management Meetings-estimate 3 18 Coordination 52 $2,778.30 QA/QC Review 8 8 $8,026.20 4 $2,647.55 Biological Assessment Site Visit&Site Assessment 12 20 $2,729.66 Draft Report 4 96 20 6 2 $12,917.18 Final Report 10 8 3 $1,914.37 Environmental Permits and Forms JARPA 4 1 10 2 1 SEPA Checklist $2,054.87 3 10 10 2 $2,367.74 Shorelines Exemption 3 44 2 $3,747.86 1r► Total Hours: 98 19 138 104 18 6 383 Labor Cost: $15,126 $2,517 $14,800 $7,502 $1,589 $358 (Note: Labor rates include overhead+profit) $41,892 Subtotal Labor $15,126 $2,517 $14,800 $7,502 $1,589 $358 $41,892 Expenses Sub-Consultants Interfluve,Inc. $49,824 Subtotal: $49,824 8%Markup: $4,982 Other Expenses: Total Sub-Consultants: $54,806 Reproduction 3 $25/Each $75 FedEx 3 $25/Each $75 Local Travel-20 miles/ea way 500 $0.505/Mile $253 Field Equipment 1 $200/Day $200 I Subtotal(No Cadd): $603 10%Markup: $60 Total Expenses: $55,469 Subtotal Expenses and markup:I I TOTAL COSTI $55,469 $97,361 Say, $97,400 dew CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL ar#: 7' AA Submitting Data: For Agenda of: October 6, 2008 Dept/Div/Board.. Finance & IS Department Staff Contact Iwen Wang, Administrator Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. X 2009 Preliminary and Final Budget Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: • Refer to Committee of the Whole Legal Dept • Set Public Hearing on 2009 Revenue Sources and Finance Dept X Preliminary Budget for November 3, 2008 Other • Set final Public Hearing on proposed 2009 Budget for November 17, 2008 Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: In compliance with RCW 35.33.051, the proposed 2009 Preliminary Budget will be submitted to the Mayor, City Council, and City Clerk by October 27, 2008. This agenda bill sets the time and place for two public hearings, November 3 and November 17, 2008. The following Ordinances will be presented in November as part of the 2009 Budget public hearing process: 1. 2009 Budget 2. 2009 Property Tax 3. Proposed Fees and Rate ordinances (prepared by departments implementing fees/rate changes.) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set public hearing dates of November 3 and November 17, 2008, to consider the 2009 Budget, and subsequently adopt the ordinances necessary to finalize the 2009 Budget. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: / O / . Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Finance& IS Department October 6, 2008 Staff Contact Iwen Wang Agenda Status Finance/IS Administrator Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Financial Management Policies Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Financial Management Policies(red-lined draft) Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Finance presents revised Financial Management Policies for review and consideration by the Renton City Council. The proposed changes include: • Separating the Historical Museum from the Library Fund which will allow to separately account for their fund balances. • Creating the Housing Authority Fund (if approved by Council). • Retitling"Capital Improvement Plan"to"Capital Investment Plan"to clarify the plan includes property acquisitions(such as The Landing Parking Garage) as well as improvements. • Other housekeeping adjustments. These policies were last updated in March 2008. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Financial Management Polices and direct Finance staff to include these policies in the Mayor's proposed 2009 Preliminary Budget document that will be presented to the Council in October 2008. H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\Ol_AgendaBills\2008_Financial Management Policies_Sept.doc Financial Management Policies Basic Policy Statement The City of Renton is committed to the highest standards of responsible financial management. The City,including the City Council,Mayor and staff will work together to ensure that all financial matters of the City are addressed with care,integrity,and in the best interest of the City. The rules and procedures contained in this section are designed to: 1. Protect the assets of the City of Renton; 2. Ensure the maintenance of open and accurate records of the City's financial activities; 3. Provide a framework of operating standards and behavioral expectations; 4. Ensure compliance with federal,state,and local legal and reporting requirements;and 5. Provide a means for the City Council to update and monitor these policies with the assistance and cooperation of the Mayor's office and the Finance and Information Services Administrator. Lines of Authority 1. The Renton City Council has the authority to execute such policies as it deems to be in the best interest of the City within the parameters of federal,state,and local law. 2. The Finance Committee has the authority to perform reviews of the organization's financial activity,determine the allocation of investment deposits,and assure that adequate internal controls are in place. 3. The Mayor and Chief Administrative Officer(CAO)have the authority to oversee the development of the annual budget,make spending decisions within the parameters of the approved budget,enter into contractual agreements,make capital asset purchase decisions and make decisions regarding the allocation of expenses within designated parameters. Unless otherwise specified in this document,principal responsibility for complying with the directives enumerated herein shall be vested in the Mayor. 4. Each Department Administrator has the authority to expend City funds within approved budget authority and in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Mayor's Office, and to recommend spending requests within the parameters of the approved budget process to the Mayor. Accounting Records and Reports 1. Basis of Accounting a. The City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) on its financial activity shall be presented in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles(GAAP)as defined by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). Introduction 1-15 Financial Management Policies 2. Basis of Budget a. The City budget is presented on a GAAP basis of accounting. 3. Fund Accounting a. The City of Renton's accounting and budgeting systems use a fund accounting consistent with guidance provided by the GASB and the Washington cState Auditor's Office. ecial Revenue,Debt b. The funds are grouped into categories:General Fund,Sp Service,Capital Projects,Enterprise,Internal Service,and Fiduciarby sep sate t. c. The City Council shall create and eliminate funds as app p riatordinance,or through the budget ordinance. d. Funds shall either be"external"or"internal"for financial purposes.reporttingose f i. Internal funds shall be separate sets of accounts for the e fundsr shall reside enhancing internal management control only. purposes,internalr funds within an external fund. For cash management pa ose , interest r may rely on their related external withoutd policies.(See Interfund Loan violation of the City's cash management policy for further clarification). e. The City's financial accounting system shall assure that the status and transactions of each account and their relationship to budget authority is clear. 4. Financial Reporting a. The CAFR shall be timely and comprehensive and meet or exceed professional industry standards. b. The City's budget documents shall provide for comparison with prior years. c. Revenue and expenditure reports shall be prepared monthly and be available on the City's website. s monthly report shall be prepared quarterly, d. A written analysis of the City' coordinated with the Chief Administrative Officer and Mayor,reviewed with the City Council,and available on the City's website. e. Alln budgettstmam�g inten�dd loans shall bhall be e disclosed d in the quarterly report. e monthly report. f. Any outstanding 5. Audit its a. The City shall commission an annual auditof fe Auditor' Oreports and related records to be conducted by the Washington fice. b. At the conclusion of the audit, the auditor shall be available to brief the City Council on the results. c. The results of the audit shall be available to the public. Policy on Stabilization Funds Sufficient fund balances and reserve levels are important in the long-term financial stability of the City. law,ordinance and/or bond covenants. 1. The City shall maintain reserves required by a. General Government i. The City shall maintain reserves in the General Government Funds of at least 10%of total budgeted operating expenditures. ii. In addition,the City shall maintain an additional reserve as a part of the City's Risk Management Funds in a minimum amount of$5,000,000. Introduction 1-16 Irv, Financial Management Policies iii. In addition,the City shall maintain an"Anti-Recessionary Reserve"in an amount of at least 2% of General Government budgeted operating expenditures. Expenditures utilizing the "Anti Recessionary Reserve" require a two-thirds majority vote of the City Council. b. The City shall maintain one year payments in voted general obligation debt service funds. c. The City shall maintain reserves in the Enterprise Funds as follows: i. Water Utility Fund: 12%-25%of total budgeted operating expenses ii. Golf Fund—25%-50%of total budgeted operating expenses. iii. All other Enterprise Funds: 10%-20% of total budgeted operating expenses d. Reserve balances of other funds shall be set through the budget process in an amount consistent with the purpose and nature of the fund. 2. Replacement reserves shall be established for equipment, and computer software should the need continue beyond the estimated initial useful life, regardless of whether the equipment is acquired via lease, gift or purchase. Service charges paid by City departments to the appropriate Internal Service funds should include an amount to provide for replacements. Financial Planning 1. The City shall maintain a long-term(five year)financial planning model. a. The financial planning model shall: i. be based on the currently adopted budget; Now ii. utilize these policies; iii. be based on assumptions and drivers realistically expected to occur; iv. clearly document the assumptions and drivers used and the results of the use of such assumptions and drivers; v. be designed in such a way to permit analysis of alternative strategies; vi. relate to the related plans of the City to include Service Delivery Plans, Comprehensive Plans,Master Plans,etc.;and vii. shall be prepared for the General Government and such other funds as the deemed necessary. 2. Budget development a. The City shall prepare an annual budget that is consistent with: i. state law; ii. the long-term financial planning model; iii. these policies;and iv. industry best practices. a. The City of Renton's annual budget shall be prepared using the following schedule and process as a general guide: i. Review stakeholder input such as surveys, public forums, neighborhood meeting notes and business community communication. ii. The Mayor,City Council and Chief Administrative Officer will conduct a goal-setting retreat with the Department Administrators updating the Business Plan and other policy guidance. iii. The City Council and Administration will meet to review and discuss the prior year's audited results, current year budget status, next budget Introduction 1-17 441111.0 Financial Management Policies schedule, process, budget guidelines and budget preparation items of interest. iv. The Finance & IS Administrator prepares inent Admhe budge et to preparation instructions and meets with Dep budget instructions and discuss budgetpreparation. of compensation v. The instructions will include policy priorities, adjustments,internal service and indirect charges. vi. Departments will provide to the o Financelbudget LinstruIS Department budget estimates and requests conforming g vii. The Mayor submits a proposed balanced Preliminary Budget to the City Council in conformance with state law. viii. The City Council conducts public hearings on the proposed budget in conformance with state law. tax levies. ix. The City Council sets the City's property x. The City Council adopts the final budget ordinance. website. xi. The Final Budget Document is published and posted to the City b. Budget amendments should be presented for consideration when the need arises. i. Budget authority shall be at the fund level. ii. Changes resulting in a need to revise the appropriation authority shall be presented as they occur. 3. Revenues a. Revenue forecasts shall assess the full spectrum of resources available to finance City programs and services. b. The City shall consider the diversification of revenue as a strategy when developing its financial plans. c. Should an economic downturn develop that results in (potential) revenue shortfalls or fewer available resources, the City will make appropriate adjustments to its budget. d. Revenue estimates shall be based on forecasting methods recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and will typically be more likely to be conservative rather than aggressive. 4. Expenditures a. Priority shall be given to expenditures that will improve productivity. 5. Capital Improvementsinves_ shall a. A comprehensive six-year plan for City capital improvements- be prepared annually and adopted by the City Council as part of the City budget. Investment Program i. All projects included in the Capital limpreverr►ar�t----- (CIP)shall be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.prepared in ii. The Capital Investment Program shall be pr eP consultation with Council Committees for ongoing capital--imprevern ents inves ts• b. All proposed capital improvement projects shall include a recommended or likely source of funding• residential, commercial and industrial projects) c. Private development (including investments that are necessary shall pay its fair share of the capital irnpr-everrr --- Introduction 1-18 Norse Financial Management Policies to serve the development in the form of system development charges,impact fees, mitigation fees,or benefit districts. d. Capital project proposals should indicate the project's impact on the operating budget, including, but not limited to, long-term maintenance costs necessary to support themeinvestment. e. Capital projects shall be budgeted for on a project life basis (rather than fiscal year). Policy on Fees and Charges 1. The City shall annually review all fees for licenses, permits, fines, rates and other miscellaneous charges as part of the budget process. 2. User charges g and fees shall be established based at a percentage of the full cost of providing the service,unless otherwise provided by statute or regulation. a. Full cost incorporates direct maintenance,overhead,and charges dfor the use of capital faindirect costs, cilities. b. Other factors for fee or charge adjustments mayincluding operations and inflation, other cost increases, the adequacy of the coverage of costs, also include the impact of competitive rates. q y g 3. Proposed rate adjustments, user charges and fees shall beand cent Council for approval each year as part of the Mayor'spresented toa the City Budget to the Council. y proposed Preliminary 4. The City shall rigorously collect all amounts due. Annual Sow Policy on Utility Funds 1. The City shall establish and maintain separate utility operating prevenient-inves__tment funds and budgets for each of its utility operations. 2. Utility rate studies shall be conducted eveyand capital to ensure the long-term solvency and viability of the sixi ems Uti update assumptions and lit 3. Utility rates and capital fees shall be reviewed annually ll andtes.necessary adjustments made to avoid major rate increases. 4. The City shall use system development charges,grants and low interest loans to fund capital projects where possible. Overall,the utilities should maintain a debt to equity ratio of 60/40. 5. Each Utility should fund an amount of the cost equal to the expense"of capital assets less debt service annual «d 6. System DevelopmentPrincipal payments, epreciation Charges (SDCs)shall be established at levels to ensure that all customers seeking to connect to the City's utility systems shall bear their equitable share of the cost of both the existing and future systems. 7. Debt financing of utility improvements will be consistent with the utility plans, council rate policies and other factors so as to smooth the effect of major improvements on utility rates. master 8. The City shall strive to maintain minimum debt service "coverage" revenue (gross operating revenue of the Utilities less operatingand mai the net expenses) of the combined Utilities being 1.25- 1.5 times the actual debt and the net revenue of the individual Utility being at least 1.25 times the actual debt lnlroducaon 1-19 Financial Management Policies investments or Policy on Debt Issuance and sManhall be confined to capital ra to e financed fr m 1. Long-termarborrowing similar projects with an extended life when it is not p currentbrevenues.The City shall not use long-term debt to finance current operations.pebeing d useful e of the 2. Debt payments shall not extend beyond the estimatety of eneralfobligation bonds at or elowfinanced. The City sunless spel keep cial circumste average ances arise warranting the need to extend below fifteen years, maintaining open the debt schedule. ratings on its debt including 3. The City shall work to and rat ng agng encies concerning its financial condition. communications with bond rating g of capital projects may be secured the 4. With Council approval,interim financing P an be secured fromoase debt financing market place or from other funds through appropriate in the circumstances. appropriate and consistent with a separately 5. The City may issue interfund loans when appro P adopted City Council policy on the subject. 6. When issuing debt, the City shall strive to use special assessment, revenue or other self-supporting bonds in lieu of general obligation bonds. 7. Long-term general obligation debt shall be utilized when necessary to acquire land or serviceon f the ability of the y to meet future debt eassetsrequirements. based ent . The a review be financed should alsotbe integrated with the uirements. The projectInve_-stment Pr°gram. req and Capital City's long-term financial plan are of a benefit to 8. General obligation debt should be used when the related projects the City as a whole. a. General Obligation Bt pVoted): i. Every project posed for financing through general obligation debt a full analysis of the future operating and should be accompanied by maintenance costs associated wproject.h the debt b. Limited Tax General Obligation Bond(Non-Voteobligation (non voted) i. The City should avoid issuing general beyond eighty percent(80%)of its general obligation debt capacity.obon s at le ds where appropriate when cost savingcan be debt and/or 9. The City shalla refunding restructuring its current outstanding achieved of at least 4% (NPV), improving restrictive bond conditions. management lto the 10. The City's financial team for the issuance cable departmentanthe Council,Mayor, CAO, s nce&IS Administrator,appcos capital projects to be financed), City Legal Counsel, designated bondftheinCery>financial advisor and underwriter in order to effectively P the Finance & IS improvement-p mvesp.projects. a. Through a competitive selection process conducted by Administrator with consultation with the Mayor, Chief Administrative Officer and Legal Counsel, the City Council shall approve the most qualified financial advisor/underwriter and bond counsel. b. These services shall be regularly monitored by the Finance&IS Administrator. shall evaluate the best method of sale for each proposed bond issue. e a. When a negotiatedor and 11. The City sale is deemed advisable(in consultation with theMtay most City Council) the Finance & IS Administrator shallnegotiate Introduction 1-20 Financial Management Policies competitive pricing on debt issues and broker commissions in order to ensure the best value to the City. b. When a negotiated sale is used, the City shall use an independent financial advisor to advise the City's participants in matters such as structure, pricing and fees. 12. The City shall comply with IRS regulations concerning use of, and reinvestment of bond proceeds. a. The City shall monitor and comply with IRS regulations with regard to potential arbitrage earnings. If arbitrage earnings are believed to be above amounts appropriate provided by IRS regulations, the City will set aside earnings in order to pay the 13. The City shall pamount to te federal government as required by IRS regulation. secondary market disclosure related to outstanding debt. Related Policies • Investment Policy • Contracting Policy(Purchasing Authority) • Interfund Loans Introduction 1-21 Financial Management Policies City Funds and Fund Structure WWI Re•ort E 000 General I(000) 001 Communi Services former' 101) ,■� I(000) I003 Streets former' 103 1000 004 Communi Develo•ment Block Grant I005 Museum former'_•art of 006 I(000) I 006 Libr. former' 106)Muses 5 Woo) I111111121111111 .. , I000 009 Farmers Market "000) 010 Fire and Emer lenc Services Memorial 11111.1111 I(000) 011 Fire and Emer enc Services Health and Wellness , E 1000 031 Park Memorial MEi I(215) 201 Ltd GO Bonds Gen Govt Misc Debt MEM ' ,, I �-1-9-78-I�GA-Bends ;F * i• � #W#61*** � � '111113111111 E 215 Gen Govt Misc Debt Service 1111 , IT _;,a,. .;, ,1.5 ,I.wv .,.� _ SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: E 102 Arterial Streets 1111111111111 1111111111111 E 108 Leased Pro•erties Fund E 110 Hotel Motel IIIIIIIIIII E 118 Reserve for Paths&Trails E 125 1%For Art 1111111111111111111111111 E 127 Cable CormnunicationDevelo•ment E 135 S•rin_brook Wetlands Bank 11111111111 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS: 1111111111111E 219 1989 Unlimited GO Bonds 111111111111 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS(CIP): 111111111111111E 303 Cornmuni Develo•ment Im•act Miti t ation 11111111111 E 304 Fire Im.act Miti:ation 1111111111111 E 305Trans•ortationlm•act Miti:ation 111.111111 E 316 Munici•al Facilities CIP 111111111111 E 317 ••-• ••• •'Ca•ital Investment Pro 1. -- -- Formatted Table I 318 Landing-GU/South Lake W ashin'on Infrastructure E . protect lntroductlon 1-22 44111100 Financial Management Policies 326 Housing Opportunity Fund ) I(316) City Funds and Fund Structure(continued) ENTERPRISE FUNDS: Key Report 402 Airport Operations E 403 Solid Waste Utility E 404 Municipal Golf Course E 405 Water Operations Utility B E 406 Waste Water Operations Utility B I(405) 407 Storni Surface Water Operations Utility B I(405) 416 King County Metro B I(405) 422 Airport CIP I(402) 424 Municipal Golf Course Capita-lCIP I(404) 425 Water Utility Construction CIP B I(405) 426 Waste Water Utility Censtruetien CIP B I(405) 427 Stern;-Surface Water Utility Construction B I(405) CIP 1(4050`)i •• _- • •• ' $ 1{405) New 471 Rate Stabilization B I(405) 481 Water/Sewer Bond Proceeds B I(405) INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: 501 Equipment Repair/Replacement E 502 Insurance Property E 503 Information Services I(501) 512 Insurance,Healthcare I(502) 522 Insurance,Leoffl Retirees HC Healthcare I(502) FIDUCIARY FUNDS: 611 Firemen's Pension E 650 Special Deposits E ACCOUNTING FUNDS: GWS Government-wide Statements Ia 901 Bank Surplus Ia 910 General Fixed Asset Account Group Ia 950 General Long-term Debt Account Group Ia Introduction 1-23 Financial Management Policies 631 Claims Clearing Ia 632 Payroll Clearing Ia Introduction 1-24 Financial Management Policies A. General Government Funds share general revenues. Therefore,no interest shall be charged for loans between funds. B. Water Utility Funds shall be managed as a system such that balance sheet accounts are merged for management and reporting purposes. E. External Fund for Reporting Purposes I. Internal Fund for Management Purposes Ia. Internal Fund for Accounting Purposes Introduction 1-25 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Lorl I AI#: Submitting Data: Public Works Department p For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division Staff Contact Rob Lochmiller,Principal Civil Engineer- Agenda Status: October 6, 2008 Transportation,x7303 Consent X Subject: Public Hearing South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Project, Correspondence CAG-06-068 Ordinance Contract Completion with Ceccanti, Inc. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Final Pay Estimate X Notice of Completion of Public Works ContracttStudract Study Other Interlocal Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept Finance Dept....... kise Fiscal Impact: (T12306) Expenditure Required.. N/A(Retainage bond) Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted... Revenue Generated..... Total Project Budget.. City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The contract provided infrastructure and improvements by extending Logan Avenue North from North 6th Street to the existing intersection at Garden Avenue North and Lake Washington Boulevard North; North 8th Street from the new Logan Avenue North to existing Park Avenue North; North 10th Street from the new Logan Avenue North to the existing Garden Avenue North; and realignment • Park Avenue North from North 8th Street to the new Logan Avenue North to support development of sting The Landing. The original contract was in the amount of$19,443,826.60, with the final contract amount being $20,273,657.42. The increase in the final amount was due to 23 change orders needed to address items through construction that were not covered in the original contract. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve the completion of the project and authorize the release of the retainage bond for the project after 60 days, subject to the required authorization. CADOCUME-1\BWalton\LOCALS--1\Temp\Retainage Agenda Billdoc i 0 e, TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE. 9/9/2008 FROM: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR CONTRACTOR: Ceccanti,Inc CONTRACT NO. CAG 06-068 ESTIMATE NO. (19)Nineteen PROJECT: South Lake Washington Roadway Improvement Project Final 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $ 199,170.70 2. SALES TAX @ 9.00% $ 99.46 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $ 199,270.16 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $18,896,973.87 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $ 189,212.16 6. SUBTOTAL-CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS $ 19,086,186.03 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS $ 994,577.61 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $ 9,958.54 9. SUBTOTAL-RETAINAGE $ 1,004,536.15 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $ 182,829.67 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $ 99.46 SALES TAX CORRECTION ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES $ 6.11 12. SUBTOTAL-SALES TAX * (95°%xLINE1) $ 182,935.24 ** (RETAINAGE 5%) GRAND TOTAL: $ 20,273,657.42 fir✓' FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11): Roadway Schedule A Schedule E $ 184,019.94 Sales Tax E $ 104.50 Schedule F $ 9.90 $ 4,037.97 Account: TI 2306-F009-0018-0002 $ 188,172.31 318.0123 06.016.5 95 0.003 0.63.000000 Sewer Schedule B Sales Tax B $ 370.50 $ 35.10 Account: T12306-F806-0018-0000 $ 405.60 i4. 318.012306.018.5940.0035.63.000000 Water Schedule C Sales Tax C $ 574.75 $ 54.46 Account: T12306-F805-0018-0000 $ 629.21 318.0123 06.018.5940.0034.63.000001 Joint Trench Schedule D Account: T12306-F202-0018-0000 $ 104.50 318.012306.016.5950.0012.63.000004 Total $ 189,311.62 RETAINED AMOUNT(Line 8): Roadway 9,685.26 Schedule A $ Schedule E $ 215.502.5 Schedule F $ 9,212.53 Account: T12306-F009-0018-0002 318.012306.016.5950.0030.63.000000 Sewer 19.50 Schedule B Account: T12306-F806-0018-0000 318.012 3 06.018.5 940.003 5.6 3.000000 Water 30.25 Schedule C Account: T12306-F805-0018-0000 318.012306.018.5940.0034.63.000001 Joint Trench 5.50 Schedule D Account: T12306-F202-0018-0000 318.012306.016.5950.0012.63.000004 9,958.54 Total TOTAL AMOUNT(Line 3) $ 198,075.60 Roadway Account: T12306-F009-0018-0002 318.012306.016.5950.0030.63.000000 425.10 Sewer Account: T12306-F806-0018-0000 318.012306.018.5940.0035.63.000000 659.46 Water Account: T12306-F805-0018-0000 318.012306.018.5940.0034.63.000001 110.00 Joint Trench Account: T12306-F202-0018-0000 $ 199, 0 0 / 318.012306.016.5950.0012.63.000004 �/ (� CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION I,THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY,THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED,THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN,AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST,DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON,AND THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM SIGNED: • IMO MONTHLY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE DMJM HARRIS AECOM 1% 10900 NE 8th Street,Suite 750 Bellevue,WA 98004 (425)454-5600 Project: S. Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Date: 8/28/2008 Contractor: Ceccanti Inc. Estimate No: NINETEEN (FINAL) Address: 4116 Brookdale Road E. Tacoma, WA 98446 DMJM Harris Project No.: 60005183 Owner: City of Renton Original Contract Bid Amount: $19,443,826.60 Pay Period: 26-Mar-08 to 24-May-08 Current Contract Bid Amount: $20,753,273.57 TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS TOTAL DUE TO DATE AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE A. Items (see attached) 20,090,722.18 19,891,551.48 199,170.70 B. Sales Tax (8.8%) 182,739.50 $182,642.26 97.24 Sales Tax Increase to 8.9% 04/01/07 -add .1% 196.16 195.05 1.11 Sales Tax Increase to 9.0% 04/01/08 -add .1% -0.42 -1.53 1.11 C. Total Contract Amount Due (A. + B.) 20,273,657.42 20,074,387.26 199,270.16 D. Less Retainage (5% of A.) 1,004,536.15 994,577.61 9,958.54 E. Amount Due Contractor(C. - D.) 19,269,143.72 19,079,832.10 189,311.62 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND I HAVE REVIEWED THIS ESTIMATE AND BELIEVE IT APPROVED: CORRECT ESTIMATE;THAT THE WORK WAS TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT AND RECOMMEND ACTUALLY PERFORMED AND MATERIAL PAYMENT OF THE SAME. FURNISHED;AND THAT THE AMOUNT IS JUST AND DUE ME. ,moi . , , A--,. `vg. ce Contractor Date DMJM Harris Date Owner Date ) 4: „ Pap_ Ornate#19 South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT 519,443.82660 City Protect No:CAG 06-066 CHANGE ORDER ADJUSTMENT $1.309,446 97 DMJM Project No.:60005183 ADJUSTED CONTRACT AMOUNT: $20.753,273.57 Contraclor Cocoons Inc NOTICE TO PROCEED; 7/10/2006 CONTRACT(CALENDAR)DAYS. 410 CHANGE ORDER DAYS 0 SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE' 8123/2007 BID SCHEDULE A-ROADWAY I STORM IMPROVEMENTS QUANTITY ESTIMATE TOTAL BID QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT DUE THIS ITEM NO DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE 001 Contractor Supplied Surveying 1.00 LS $232,570 00 $232,570.00 1 00 100.00% $232,570.00 $220,941 50 0.05 $11,528.50 002 SPCC Plan 1.00 LS $3,120.00 $3,120 00 1.00 100 00% $3,120.00 $3,120.00 0.00 $0 00 003(CO8&15) Resolution of Utility Conflicts 1.00 FA $101,000.00 $101,000.00 215,645.73 _ 213.51% $215,645.73 $214,795.16 850.57 $860.87 004 Mobilization 1.00 LS 51,080,714.00 51,080,714.00_ 100 100.00% $1,080,714.00 $1,080,714.00 0.00 00.00 005 Traffic Control Labor 7,500.00 HR $39.02 $292,650.00_ 4,414.00 58,85% $172,234.28 5172,234.28 0 00 $0.00 006 Traffic Control Supervisor 2,500.00 HR 063.92 0159,800.00_ 1.984.00 79.36% $128,817.28 $126,817.28 0.00 $0.00 007 Project Temporary Traffic Control 1.00 LS $75,670.00' 075.670 00 1.00 100.00% 875,670,00 575.670.00 0.00 $0.00 008 Clearing and Grubbing 1.00 LS $33.561.00 $33,651 00 1.00 100.00% 533,581.00 $33,651.00 0.00 80.00' 009(C012) Sawcut 12,670.00 LF $7.00_ $88,690.00 5,874.90 _ 70.05% $62,124.30 $62,124.30 0 00 50.00 010(0012) Curb Gutter Removal 5,518.00 LF $3.90 $21,520.20 4,496.00 81.48% $17,534.40 517.534,40 0.00 $0.00 011(CO12) Asphalt Concrete Pavement removal 1,416.00 SY $1330_ $18,832.80 7,11313 502.34% $94,604.63 $94,604.63 0.00 50.00 012(C012) Sidewalk Removal 7,711.00 SY $11.90 891,750 90 4,522.01 58.64% 553,811.92 $53,811.92 0.00 00.00 013 Remove Buried Cement Conc Slab(8th Sl.) 1,400.00 SY $8.60 012 540,00 2,494.50 178.18% $21,452.70 $21,452.70 0.00 $0.00 014 Remove Buried Cement Conc Slab(Park Ave.) 500.00 SY $13 15 $6,575.00 715.98 143.20% $9,415.14 $9,415.14 0.00 00.00 015 Cement Concrete Pavement Removal 9,133.00 SY $9.60 $87,676.80 3,603.25 39,45% _ $34,591,20 834,591.20 0.00 50.00 016 Removal Of Structure And Obstruction 1.00 LS $134,05000 $134,050.00 1.00 100.00% $134,050.00 $134,050.00 0.00 $0.00 017(C014) Remove Existing Piling 125.00 LF $363,10 $45,387.50 125.00 100.00% $45,387.50 545,387.50 0.00 $0.00 019 Embankment Compaction 4,500.00 CY $6.12 $27,540.00 3,484.42 77,43% 021,324.85 $21,324.65 0.00 $0.00 019 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl.Haul 2,400.00 CY $24.92 059,806.00 424.78 17.70% - $10,585.52 $10,585.52 0.00 $0.00 020(C012) Roadway Excavation Incl.Haul 22,958.00 CY $23 00 $528,034.00 26,862.70 117.01% $617,842.10 $617,842.10 0.00 $0.00 021 Gravel Borrow Incl.Haul 8,400.00 TON $27.73 5232,932.00 729.00 8.68% 520,215.17 $20,215.17 0.00 $0.00 022 Controlled Density FIII 500.00 CY $99.55 $49,775 00 0.00 0 00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 50.00 023 Trimming And Cleanup 1.00 LS $25.205 00 $25,205.00 1.00 100.00% 825,205.00 525,205 00 0.00 80.00 024 Construction Geolext4e For Separation 11,000 00 SY $1.17 $12,870 00 5,513.67 50.12% $6,450.99 $6,450.99 0.00 80.00 Construction Geolexlie For Sol Stabilization 025 (Storm) 3,650.00 SY $2.10 $7,665.00 8.75954 239,99% $18,395.03 518.395.03 000 80.00 026(C012) Crushed Surfacing Top 15,892 00 TON $19.27 $306,238.84 20,520.90 129.13% 5395,437.74 $395,437.74 0,00 $0.00 027 Planning Bituminous 1,500.00 SY $6.27 $9,405.00 3,053.71 203.58% $19,146.76 $14,590.98 726.60 54,555,78 026 Longitudinal Joint Seal 9,600.00 LF $538 551,548.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 029(C012) HMA Cl.1/2 In.PG 64-22 3,838.00 TON $64 53 $247,668.14 5,085.66 132.51% $328,177.64 $328,177.64 0.00 50.00 030 Job Mix Compliance Price Adjustment 1.00 CALC $1.00 $1 00 0.00 0 00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 031 Compaction Price Adjustment 1.00 CALC $1.00 $1.00 0.00 0.00% 50,00 $0.00 0.00 SO 00 032(COO Cement Concrete Pavement-Including Dowels 8.086.00 CY $243.17 $1,965,272.52 7.383.01 91.31% $1,795,326.54 $1,795,326.54 0.00 50.00 032(MOH) Cement Concrete Pavement-Material on Hand NA LS 51.00 NA _ (0 00) NA $0.00 $0.00 0 00 50.00 033(006) Stamped Cement Concrete Pavement 0 00 5Y $100.36 $0.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 034 Storm Dram Pipe.6 IN Dia 114.00 LF ' $35 75 54,075 50_ 0 00 0.00% .. SO 00 $0.00 0.05 $0.00 035(0010) Storm Drain Pipe,8 1n.Dia. 76.00 LF 542.00 $3,192 00 70 00 32.1110 52.940.00 $2,940.00 0.00 80.00 036 Storm Drain Pipe,81n Dla.(01) 511.00 LF $41 50' $21,206.50' 778.00 152.25% $32,287.00 $32.287.00 0.00 80.00 037(C05&6&10) Storm Dram Pipe,12 In Dia 6.627 00 LF $27.40 $181,579.80_ 6,174.00 93.16% $169,167.60 $169,167.60 0 00 $0.00 038 Storm Drain Pipe,12 ln.Dia(DI) 124.00 LF $61.00 57,564.00_ 346.00 279.03% 821,106.00 521,106.00 0.00 $0.00 039 Storm Dram Pipe,15 In.Dia 1,303.00 LF $48 20 $62,804.60 542.00 _ 41.60% $26,124.40 $26,124.40 0.00 SO 00 040(CO10) Storm Drain Pipe,18 In.Dia 2,023.00 LE 556 00 $113,288.00 1,790.50 _ 88 51% 5100,268.00 $100,268.00 0.00 $0 00 041(0010) Storm Dram Pipe,24 In.Da 594.00 LF $76 70 $45,559 80 720.50 121.30% 555,262 35 $55,262.35 0.00 $0.00 042 Storm Drain Pipe,30 In.Dia 400.00 LF 593 50 $37,400.00 496.50 124 13% 548,422.75 546,422.75 0.00 50.00 043 Storm Drain Pipe,36 In,Dla 1,290.00 LF $94.10 5121,389.00 1.288 00 99 84% 5121,200.80 5121200 80 0.00 $0.00 ♦r Pay Estimate#19 QUANTITY ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE TOTAL BID QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS THIS AMOUNT DUE THIS UNITS UNIT PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE 044 Storm Drain Pipe.42 In.Dia 195.00 LF $215.85 $42,090.75 184.00 94.35% $39,716.40 $39,716.40 0.00 $0.00 045 Storm Drain Pipe.48 In.Da 2,398.00 LF $215.00 $515,570.00 2,276.00 94.91% $489,340.00 5489,340 00 0.00 80.00 ' . Storm Drain Pipe.60 In Die 270.00 LF $314.54 $84,925.80 290.00 107.41% $91218.60 $91,216.60 0.00 $0.00 047 CO10 Connect to Exislln•Structure 9.00 EA $4900.00 $36,000 00 10.00 IIIMEM $40,000.00 $40,000 00 0.00 $0.00 048(0012) Adjust Utility to Grade 14.00 EA $447.50 $6,265.00 4.00 INIEDMIN $1,790.00 $1,790.00 0.00 $0.00 049 Adjust Boeing Power Vault to Grade 1,00 EA $1,620.00 $1,620.00 1.00 100.00% $1,620.00 $1,620.00 0.00 $0.00 050(CO5) Catch Basin Type l 37.00 EA $1,528.00 $56,536.00 40.00 108.11% $61,120.00 $81,12000 0.00 $0.00 051 Catch Basin Type 1(OFC) 29.00 EA 31 344.00 $38,976.00 28.00 96.55% $37,632.00 $37,632.00 0.00 $0.00 Catch Basin T pe 1L 9.00 EA $1,394.75 $12,552.75 10.00 111.11% $13,947.50 IMMIKEMECII 0.00 $0.00 6.00 $1,716.00 $10,296.00 $73.728.00 $13,728.00 0.00 $0.00 054 C010 1E22171111MEIMINIIIIIIMIECIIIIIMIEBEE1111111BEEE11111111KIMIll 140.00% $26,425.00 $26,425.00 0.00 $0.00 055 Catch Basin Type 2-48"(OFC) 3.00 $3.870.00 $11,610.00 2.00 66.87% $7,740.00 $7,740.00 0.00 $0.00 056 Catch Basin Type 2,72 In.Dia. 1.00 $8,895.00 $8,895.00 1.00 100.00% $8,895.00 1111111111111=3 0.00 $0.00 057 Castch Basin Type Special 2.00 $2,780.00 $5,560.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 058 Storm Drain Manhole Type 2.48 In.Dia 17.00 $4,010.00 $68,170.00 13.00 76.47% $52,130.00 $52,130.00 0.00 $0.00 059 Storm Drain Manhole T pe 2,541n Dia 4.00 ' $4,800.00 $19,200.00 3 00 75.00% $14,400.00 $14,400.00 0.00 $0.00 060 Storm Drain Manhole Type 2,60 In.Dia 4.00 $5,875.00 $23,500.00 4.00 100.00% $23,500.00 $23.500.00 0.00 $0.00 061 Storm Drain Manhole Type 2,72 In Dia 12.00 $6,140.00 $73,680.00 11.00 91.67% $67,540.00 $67,540.00 0.00 $0.00 062 Storm Drain Manhole Type 2,72 In.Da(Diversion 2.00 $9,690.00 $19,380 00 2.00 100.00% $19,380.00 $19,380.00 0.00 $0.00 063 Storm Drain Manhole T4•e 2,96 In.Da 2.00 $15,466.00 $30,932.00 1.00 50.00% $15,466.00 $15,466.00 0.00 $0.00 123.1111111111 Storm Drain Manhole 7 •e 2,108 In.Da 11111101011111 $26,270.00 $26,270.00 111103.111 100.00% $26,270.00 $26,270.00 0.00 $0.00 065 Storm Drain Manhole Type 2.144 In.Da 1.00 EA $33,660.00 $33,660 00 1.00 100.00% $33,660.00 $33,660.00 0.00 $0.00 066 Demolish Catch Basin Type 1 61.00 EA 5340,10 $20,746.10 25.00 40.98% $8,502.50 1111.1KOMMI 0.00 $0.00 067 Demolish Catch Basin Type 2 3.00 EA $500.00 51.500.00 6.00 200.00% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.00 $0.00 068 Remove 48•Dam.Manhole 3.00 EA $990.00 $2,970.00 3.00 100 00% $2,970.00 $2,970.00 0.00 $0.00 069 Groundwater Control Plan 1.00® $2,730.00 $2,730.00 1.00 100.00% $2,730.00 $2,730.00 0 00 $0.00 070 Wellpoint 5 tem 7,400.00 $102.11 5755314 00 5,155.38 69.67% 1110=11331.1.11310302 0.00 $000 071 Pumped Well System 900.00 LF $5.46 $4,914.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0 00 072 Trench Sump Pumping 3,500.00 LF $12.56 $43,960.00 4,665.50 133.30% $58,598.68 058,598.68 0.00 $0.00 073 Remove 12 In./24 In.Storm Drain 51.00 LF $22.60 $1,152.60 476.88 935 06% $10,777.49 MIEMMEEZEI 0.00 $0.00 074 Remove 36 In 142 In.Storm Drain 195.00 LF $46 60 $9,087.00 633.00 324.62% $29,497.80 $29,497.80 0.00 $0.00 MIIMmolimi - - •" 350 00 MIII 540.00 514.000.00 IIMMEINIIIMILIEMIN $2,008.80 52908.80 0.00 $0.00 076 Surface Restoration Al Boeing Parking Lot 1.00 LS 523320.00 528,320.00 1.00 100.00% $28,320.00 $28,320.00 0.00 $0.00 077 Pipe Cap 18" 8.00 EA $434.90 03479.20 6 00 1.11=11. $2,609.40 $2,609.40 0.00 50.00 078 Cutting,Plugging Existing Pipes 1 00 LS $33,805.00 $33,805.00 1.00 100 00% $33,805 00 $33,805.00 0.00 $0.00 079 Backfillin•Existln•Tunnel 1.00 LS $30,180.00 $30,180.00 1.00 100.00% $30,180.00 $30,180.00 0.00 $0.00 080 Non-Structural Shoring Or Extra Excavation 50,000 00 SF $1.74 $87,000.00 56,320.28 singign $97,997.29 $97,997.29 0.00 $0.00 081 Structural Shoring 5,000.00 SF $2.20 511,00000 28,161.21 563 22% $61,954.66 $61,954.66 0.00 80.00 082 Removal Of Unsuitable Material 900 00 CY $38.41 532,769 00 1,197.61 133.07% $43,604.98 $43.604.98 0.00 $0.00 Foundation Stabilization material Storm) 1,200.00 ECZEIMINEENI $35,600.00 J.' r r' •r0 1 1 0.00 $0.00 084 Bank Run Gravel For Trench 9,000.00 TON $18.86 $169,740.00 8,539.32 94.88% $161,051.58 $161,051.58 0.00 $000 085 Settlement Monllorin•Pr.•ram 1.00 LS 520.120.00 $28,120.00 100 100.00% $28,120.00 $26,714.00 $1,406.00 086 Wet Vault 900.00 LF 52.111.37 $1,900,233.00 900.00 100.00% 01.900,233.00 $1,900,233.00 0.00 $0.00 087 ON-Water Separator 2.00 EA $18,120.00 $36,240.00 200 100.00% $36,240.00 $36,240.00 0.00 $0.00 088(CO22) Erosion/Water Pollution Control 1 00 FA $250.000.00 5250.000.00 394,562.60 157.83% $394,562.60 $394,562.60 0.00 50.00 089 Street Cleaning 1000.00 HR $120.03 $120,030.00 66135 66.14% $79,381.84 $79,381.84 0.00 $0.00 090 SWPP Plan 1.00 EA $624 00 $624.00 1.00 100.00% $624.00 $624.00 0.00 $0.00 091 Decommission Monitoring Wells t0.00 EA 0862.27 $8,622.70 800 80.00% $6,898.16 $6.898.16 0.00 50.00 092 Seeding And Fertilizing(Erosion Control) 5.00 ACRE $984.00 $4,920.00 1.50 30.00% $1,476.00 $1,476.00 0.00 $0.00 093 Mulching(Erosion Control) 5.00 ACRE $738.54 $3,692.70 1.50 30.00% $1,107.81 1111111111Edil 0.00 50.00 094 Planting Area Preparation 2,130.00 SY $2.06 $4,387.80 4,050.00 190.14% $8,343.00 $8,343.00 0.00 $0.00 095(C05) Solt Amendment 303.00 CY $63.26 $19,167 78 340.00 112.21% 021,508.40 ; •r 0.00 $000 096 Seeded Lawn Installation 2,200.00 SY $068 $1,496.00 2,200.00 100.00% $1,496.00 $1,496.00 000 $0.00 097(C05812) Bark Mulch 250.00 CY $28 73 $7,182.50 220.00 88.00% $6,320 60 96320.60 0.00 $0 00 098(C012) Shrubs(1 Gal) 1,590.00 EA $11.19 $17,792.10 1,918.00 120 63% $21,462.42 $21,462.42 0.00 $0.00 099(C058.12) Shrubs(2 Gal) 1,173.00 EA $22.48 $26,369.04 986.00 84.06% 822,16528 $22,165.28 0.00 00.00 100(C05812 Topsoil T$0 A 4,116.00 CY $30 63 0126,073.08 4,806.00 116.76% 0.00 $0.00 101(C05) Metal Tree Grates&Frames 0.00 EA 51,305 39 $0.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 102(C05812) Deciduous Trees(3"Caliper) 239 00 EA $657 08 $157,042 12 231.00 96.65% IIIIMEMIIMOCERIEMI 0.00 50.00 103(C05) Deciduous Trees(2"Caliper) 106.00 EA $434 44 $46,050.64 108.00 100.00% $46,050.64 $46,050.64 0.00 $0.00 104(CO19) Plant Establishment(1 YR) 0.00 EST $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 50.00 105(COS) Automatic Irrigation System 0.00 LS $216,694.19 $0.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 50.00 0.00 $0.00 106(C013) Cement Conc.Traffic Curb 1,944.00 LF $18.37 $35,711.28 1,732.90 89.14% 931,633.37 IMMEMESEEI 0,00 50.00 107(C06&12) Cement Concrete Traffic Curb and Gutter 2,142.00 LF $12.63 $27,053 46 4,640.05 216.62% $58,603.83 $58,603.83 000 50.00 108 Mountable Cement Concrete Traffic Curb 240.00 LF $24.47 $5,872.80 239.26 99.89% $5,854.69 $5,854.69 0 00 $0.00 109 Roundabout Truck Apron Inner Cement Conc Cur. 145.00 LF $32 60 $4,727 00 144 00 99.31% $4,694.40 $4,694.40 0.00 $0.00 I Hay1stmate s i# QUANTITY ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE UNITS UNIT PRICE T QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT DUE THIS Jr • QUANTITY THIS Ai. DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT EST MATE ESTIMATE 110(COS) Cement Concrete Driveway Entrance Type 1 345.00 SY $44.12 515,221 40 488.36 141.55% 521,546 44 $21,546 44 0.00 $0 00 111 Type C Block Traffic Curb 450.00 IF $11.48 $5,166 00 559,90 124.42% $6,427.65 $6,427.65 0.00 $0.00 112(CO20) Raised Pavement Marker,Type 1 130.00 HUNG $218.57 $28,414.10 122.20 L 94 00% 526,709.25 526,709.25 0.00 50.00 113(CO20) Raised Pavement Markers,Type 2 15.00 HUNG $300.54 $4,508.10 15.20 101.33% 54,568.21 $4,568.21 0.00 $0.00 114 Monument Case,Cover And Pipe 8.00 EA $595.52 $4,764.16 8.00 100.00% $4,764 16 52,382.08 4,00 52,382.08 115 1C05512815) Cement Conc.Sidewalk 6,911.00 SY $33 08 $228,615 88 6.479.51 93.76% 5214,342.19 $214,342.19 0.00 50 00 116(C06&12) Cement Conc.Sidewalk ramp Type 1B 51.00 EA $1214.33 $61,930.83_ 63.00 123.53% $76,502.79 576502.79 0.00 $0.00 117 Quarry Spalls 2,000.00 TON $27.29 $54,580.00 384.19 _ 19.21% ' $10,484.55 $10,484.55 0.00 $0.00 118 Remove Existing Signal Complete 3.00 EA $9,772.64' 529,317,92- 3.00 100.00% $29,317.92 $28,145.20 0.12 $1,172 72 119New Traffic Signal Complete(Logan/10th) 1.00 LS $107,907.73 $107,807.73 1.00 100.00% ' $107.807,73 5107,807 73 0.00 $0.00 120 +New Traffic Signal Complete(Park/Bth) 1.00 LS $156,203.50 $156,203.50 1.00 100.00% $156,203.50 $156,203.50 0.90 00.00 121 New Traffic Signal Complete(Logan/81h) 1.00 LS $138,925.16 $138,925.16 1.00 100.00% 5138,925.16 $138,925.16 0.00 50.00 122 New Traffic Signal Complete(Park/101h) 1.00 LS 5143,911.33 $143,911.33 1.00 100.00% $143,911.33 $143,911.33 0.00 50.00 123 New Traffic Signal Complete(Logan/61h) 1.00 LS $139,433.60 $139,433.60 1.00 _-' 100.00% $139,433.60 $136,644.93 0.02 $2,788.67 124 New Traffic Signal Complete(Logan/Park) 1.00 LS $179,419.04 $179,419.04 1.00 100.00% $179,419.04 $179,419.04 0.00 $0.00 125 Revise Traffic Signal Complete(Gardenl6th) 1.00 LS $14,148.89 $14,148.89 1.00 100.00% 514,148.89 $14,148.89 0.00 $0.00 126 Temporary Traffic Signal Complete(Garden) 1.00 LS $20,800.72 $20,800.72 1.00 100.00% 120,900.72 $20,800.72 0.00 So 00 127 Relocate Illumination Pole 2.00 EA $2,514.14_ $5,028.28_ 2.00 100.00% $5,028.28 $628.54 1.75 $4,399.74 128 Sgnai Interconnect System Complete 1.00 LS $139,831.93 $139,831.93 1.00 100.00% L $139.931.93 0139,831.93 0.00 3000 129(COS) Illumination System Complete 0.00 LS $775,072.72 00.00_ 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 129(59061) Illumination System-Materials on Hand NA LS $1.00 NA 0.00 NA 50.00 $0.00 0.00 50.00 130 Permanent Signing 1.00 LS $41,528.00 $41,528.00 1.00 100.00% $41,528.00 $39,451.60 0.05 52,078.40 131 Paint Line 5,000.00 LF 50.16 $800.00 6,389.20 ll 127.78% $1,022.27 $658.24 2,275.20 5364.03 132 Plastic:Crosswalk Line 770.00 SF $2.73 $2,102.10 4,678.87 r 607 65% 512,773.32 $5,446.00 2,884.00 $7,327.32 133 Plastic Stop Line 800.00 IF $3.55 $2,840.00 945.10 118.14% $3,355.11 $3,355.11 0.00 $0.00 134(CO20) Plastic Traffic Arrow 128.00 EA $60.11 $7,694.08 157.00 122.66% $9,437.27 $9,437.27 0,00 $0.00 135 Painted Bicycle Lane Symbol 6.00 EA $60.11 - 0360.66 6 00 100.00% $360.66 $360.66 0 00 $0.00 138 Plastic Traffic Letter 32.00 EA $28.41 $909.12 4.00 12.50% ^ $113.64 $113.640.00 $0.00 137 Temporary Pavement Markings 27,000.00 LF $0.16 $4,320.00 17.428.00 64.55% $2,788.48 $2,788.48 0.00 $0.00 138 Remove Temporary Pavement Markings 27,000.00 LF 50,44- $11,880.00 18,638.00 69.03% $8,200.72 $8,200.72 0.00 00.00 139(CO1) Variable Message Signs 1.00 LS $9,603.52 $9,603.52 L 1.00 _ 100 00% L $9,603.52 $9,803.52 0.00 50.00 140(C01) Revised Detour Sig_ning 1.00 LS $1,558.99 $1,558.99 1.00 100.00% 51.558.99 $1,558.99 0.00 $0.00 141(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Ceccand) 9,000.00 HR $1.04 $9,360.00 27,05100 J 300.57% $28,133.04 $28,133.04 0.00 $0.00 142(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Buckley) 500.00 HR $1.01 5505 00 66.00 13.20% 966.66 568.66 0.00 $0.00 143(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rale Adjustment(Goodnight) 200.00 HR $1.01 $202.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 144(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Potelco) 3.000.00 HR $1.01 $3,030.00� 0 00 F 0.00% - $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 145(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rale Adjustment(RW Rhine) 200.00 HR $1.01 $202.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 148(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Salinas) 1,500.00 HR $1.01 $1,515.00 160.00 10.67% $161.60 $161.60 0.00 5000 147(002) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Strlperite) 500.00 HR $1,01 $505.00 0 00 0 00% $0.00 50.00 0.00 $0.00 148(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Trans Tech) 250.00 HR $1.01' $252.50 16,00 6.40% $16.18 $16.16 0.00 $0.00 149(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Trenchless) 3,000.00 HR $1.01 $3,030.00 630.50 21.02% $636.91 $636.91 0.00 90.00 150(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Triton Marine 3,000.00 HR $1.01 $3,030.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 50.00. 151(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Western Ash 250.00 HR 31 01 $252.50 19.50 7.80% $19.70 $19.70 0.00 00.00 152(CO2) Davis Bacon Wage Rate Adjustment(Others) 100.00 HR $1.01' $101.00920.00 920.00% $929.20 $929.20 0.00 $0.00 153(CO5) Irrigation System-Revised 1.00 LS $264,079.15 $264,079.15- 1 00 100.00% $264,079,15 $264,079.15 0.00 50.00 154(CO5) Illumination System Complete-Revised 1,00 LS $955,104.26 $955,104.26 1.00 100.00% $955,104.26 $907,349.05 0.05 $47,755.21 15$(COS) Groundcover 1,930.00 EA $4.20 58,106 00 0.00 0.00% 50.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 156(C05) Supply Metal Tree Grates and Frame 103.00 EA $956.33 $98,501 99 103.00100 00% $98,501.99 $98,501.99 0 00 $0.00 Stamped Cement Concrete Intersection Pavement .. 157(C06) w/Reinforcing Bar 8,580.00 SY $123.48 01.059,458.40 9134.9310647% $1,127,981 16 51,127.981.16 000 $0.00 Stamped Cement Concrete Intersection Pavement ' 158(C06) Including Dowels 2,770 00 SY $106.06 $293.786.20 2,975.13 107.41% $315,542,29 0315,542.29 0.00 $0.00 159(COS) Dowel Size Reduction 8,086.00 CY ($2 24) (518,112.64) 7,383.01 91.31% --ti (516,537.94) 1516,522.76) 6.78 ($15.18) Integral Cement Concrete Curb wl#3 Reinforcing • 160(008813) Bar Ties 0.00 IF $12.84 $0.000.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 50.00 Integral Cement Concrete Curb with Concrete ,. 181(C06813( Roadway 4,440.00 LF $3.25 $14,430.00 4,486.00 101.04% $14,579.50 $14,579.50 0.00 50.00 162(C07) Boeing K-9 Bypass Access 1.00 LS $20,103.41 $20,103.41 1.00 100.00% $20,103.41 $20,103.41 0.00 00.00 163(C09) Cement Treated Base 10,000.00 SY $5.37 $53,700.00' 12,357.87 123.58% $86,381.76 $66,361.76 0.00 00.00 164(C09) Prepare Park Avenue Subgrade 5,00000 SY $1.57 57,850.00 6,496.10 129.92% $10,198.88 $10,198.88 0.00 $0.00 165(C010) Rehandling Cha9e for Deleted Materials 1.00 LS _ $2,762.61 $2,762.61 1.00 100 00% 52,762.61' $2,762.61 0.00 $0.00 166(C012) Rehandling Charge for Deleted Materials 1.00 LS $1,361 70 $1,361.70 1,00100,00% $1,361.70 $1,361.70 0,00 $0.00 167(C012) Irrigation EMensin on 8th St. 1.00 LS $10,906.62 $10,906.62 1.00 - 100.00% $10,906.62 $10,906.62 0.00 $0.00 168(C012) Vibernum Tinus 23.00 EA 55258 0209.34 23.00 100.00% 0,209.34 $1,209.34 0.00' $0.00 169(0012) Rhododendron Amalels,5 Gal 135.00 EA $63.62 $5,588.70 135.00 _ 100.00% a $8,588.70 $8,588.70 0.00 $0 00 170(C012) Escallonia,5 Gal 52.00 EA $57.01 $2,964.52 $2.00 100 00% $2,964.52 $2.964.52 0.00 $0.00 171(C012) Dwarf Chinese Holly 91.00 EA $48.50 $4,413.50 91.00 100.00% 54,413 50 $4,413 50 0.00 $0.00 `J 7• ' Pay Estimate#19 QUANTITY ITEM NO DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE UNITS UNIT PRICE TOTAL BID QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS THIS AMOUNT DUE THIS QUANTITY AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE 172(C012) Korean Liltleleal Boxwood 52.00 EA $55.89 $2,906.28 52.00 100.00% $2906.28 $2906 28 0.00 $0 00 173(C012) Rugosa Rose 15.00 EA $38.25 5573.75 15 00 100.00% $573.75 $573.75 0.00 $0.00 174(C012) Dwarf Foundation Grass 219.00 EA - $22.23 $4968.37 219.00 100.00% $4,868.37 $4,868.37 0.00 $0.00 175(C012) Blue Oat Grass 39.00 EA $22.23 $866.97 39.00 100 00% $866.97 $866.97 0.00 $0.00 1761C012) Harleaf Bergenla 262.00 EA $22.62 $5,926.44 262.00 100.00% $5,928.44 $5,928.44 0.00 $0.00 177(0012) Daylty 108.00 EA $2223 $2,400.84 108.00 100.00% $2,400.84 $2,400.84 0.00 $0.00 176(C012) Hldcole Lavender 51.00 EA $22.62 $1,153.62 51.00 100.00% $1,153.62 $1,153.62 0.00 $0.00 179(C012) Blondy Euonymus 66.00 EA $22.62 $1,492.92 6600 100.00% $1,49292 $1,492.92 0.00 $0.00 180(C012) Autumn Joy Slonecrop 24.00 EA $22.62 $542.88 24.00 100.00% $542.88 $542.88 0 00 $0.00 181(C012) Emerald Green Euoymus 154.00 EA $22.23 $3,423.42 154.00 100.00% $3,423.42 $3.423.42 0.00 $0.00 182(C012) Vince Minor Deletion 1 00 LS $1,930.00 $1,930 00 1.00 100 00% $1,930.00 $1,930.00 0.00 $0.00 ' 183(CO13) Non-Integral Cement Curb 10,800.00-LF $10.53 $113,724.00 10.80200 100.02% $113,745.06 $113,745.06 0.00 $0.00 184(C014) Remove Existing Steel Piling 700.00 LF $45.00 $31,500.00 700.00 100.00% $31,500.00 531.500.00 0.00 $0.00 185(C014) Remove Esisbng Wooden Piling 800 00 LF $25.00 $20,000.00 700.00 87.50% $17,500.00 $17,500.00 0.00 SO 00 188(C015) B21 Bus Pad 2.00 EA $1,894.16 $3,788.32 2.00 100.00% $3,788.32 53,788.32 0.00 $0.00 167(0015) B22 Bus Pad 2.00 EA $2,478.68 $4,957.36 2 00 100.00% $4,957.36 $4,957.36 0.00 $0 00 188(C016) SDMH L-30 Changes 1.00 LS 033,000.00 033,000 00 1 00 100.00% $33,000.00 533,000.00 0.00 $0.00 189(0017) Luminaire Spread Fooling 8 00 EA $2,500 00 $20,000.00 8 00 100.00% $20,000 00 520,000.00 0.00 SO 00 190(C018) Additional Traffic Loops at N.Park Drive 1.00 LS $9,576.00 $9,576 00 1 00 100.00% $9,576.00 $9,576.00 0 00 $0.00 191(C018) Pedestrian Display Revisions 81h/Garden 1.00 LS $2,727 20 $2,727 20 1.00 100 00% $2,727.20 $2,727 20' 0.00 $0.00 192(C018) N Park Drive Signal Credit 1.00 LS (5750.001 (5750.00) 1 00 100.00% ($750 00) (5750.00)_ 0.00 $0 00 193(COW) Not Used NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.00 $0.00 194(CO20) Added Signing on Garden Avenue 1.00 LS $7,140.00 $7,140 00 1 00 100 00% $7,140.00 $7,140.00 0.00 $0.00 195(CO21) Amendment to BI A156 Supply Metal Tree Grates 103.00 EA 547.67 $4,910.01 103.00 100.00% $4,910.01 $4,910.01 0.00 $0.00 196(CO22) Unsuitable Soils on Park Avenue 1.00 LS $29,500.00 $29,500.00 1.00 100 00% $29,500.00 $29,500.00 0.00 $0.00 197(CO22) Comensation for Iron-Rich Water Sampling 1.00 LS $39,177.48 $39,177.48 1.00 100.00% $39,177.48 $39,177.48 0.00 90.00 198(CO22) Signal Systems Battery Back-up 1 00 LS $42,269.34 042269.34 1.00 100.00% $42,269.34 $42,269.34 0.00 $0.00 199(0023) Over-Under-Run UnN Analysts 1 00 LS $49,830.36 $49,830.36 1.00 100 00% $49,830.36 $0.00 1 00 $49,830.36 200(CO23) Boeing Impacts 1.00 LS $9,183.00 $9,183.00 1.00 100.00% $9,183.00 $0.00 1.00 $9,183.00 201(CO23) Dispersal of De-Watering Effluent 1.00 LS $48,000.00' $48,000.00 1 00 100.00% $48,000 00 $0.00 1.00 548,000 00 900(MOH) Materials On-Hand'Roadway/Storm NA LS $1 00 NA 0.00 0 00% $0.00 50.00 0.00 $0.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE A. 16,407,076.12 16,213,370.92 193,70520 RETAINAGE(5%before lax): 820,353.81 810,668.55 9,685.26 NET PAYMENT SCHEDULE A: 15.586,722.31 15,402,702.37 184,019 94 BID SCHEDULE B-SEWER QUANTITY ESTIMATE TOTAL BID QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT DUE THIS i ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT PRICE THIS QUANTITY AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE 01 Contractor Supplied Surveying 1 LS $7,800.00 $7,800.00 1.00 100.00% $7,800.00 $7,410.00 0.06 5390.00 02 Mobilization 1T LS _ $5,500.00 $5,500.00_ 100 100.00% $5,500.00 $5,500.00 0.00 90.00 03 Construction GeolextNe For Soli Stabilization 4400 SY $2.20 $9,680.00 1.361.22 30.94% 82,994.88 $2,994.88 0.00 $0.00 04 Bank Run Gravel For Trench 7000 TON $16.70 5116,900.00 4,664.18 66.63% $77,891.81 $77,891.81 0.00 50.00 05 Remove 48.Ola,Manhole 1 EA $3,730.00 $3,730.00 1.00 100.00% $3,730.00 $3,730.00 0.00 $0.00 08 Demolish Miscelaneous Sewer Facilities 1 LS $9,980.00 $9,960.00 1.00 100.00% $9,980.00 $9,980.00 0.00 $0.00 07 Controlled Densly Fill 100 CY $100.00 $10,000 00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 08 Non-Structural Shoring Or Extra Excavation 33000 SF 51.75 $57,750.00 46,547.78 141.05% $81,458.62 $81,458.62 0 00 50.00 09 Structural Shoring 9600 SF $2.18 $20,928.00 000 000% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 10 Cutting,PlugglnjExlsting Pipes 1 LS $4,900.00 $4,900.00 1 00 100.00% $4,900.00 $4,900.00 0 00 $0.00 11 Removal Of Unsuitable Material 700 CY $37.25 $26.075.00 446.50 63.79% $16,632.13 $16,632.13 0.00 $0.00 12 Foundation Stabilization Material 1000 TON $29.90 $29,900.00 669.91 66.99% $20,030.31 $20,030.31 0 00 $0.00 13 Demolish Sewer Meter Vault 1 LS $4,225.00 $4,225.00 1.00 100 00% 54,225.00 $4,225.00 0.00 $0.00 14 Sewer Manhole 48 In.Diem. 15 EA _ $7285.00 $109,275.00 15 00 100 00% $109275 00 $109275.00 0.00 50.00 15 Sewer Manhole 60 In Dlam.(Inside Drop) 1 EA $17,140.00 $17,14000 1.00 100.00% $17,140 00 $17,140.00 0.00 $0.00 16 Sewer Manhole 72 In.Dam. 2 EA $7,910 00 015,820.00 1.00 50.00% $7,910.00 $7910 00 0.00 $0 00 17 Sewer Manhole 72 In.Diem.(Inside Drop) 3EA $16,400.00 $49200 00 2.00 66.67% $32,800.00 $32,800.00 0.00 $0 00 18 Connect To Existing 96 In.Metro Sewer 5 EA _ $13,560 00 $67,800.00 5.00 100 00% $67,800.00 $67,800 00 0.00 $0.00 19 PVC Santitary Sewer 15 In.Da 1584 LF $71.50 $113,256.00_ 1.606.50 101.42% $114,864.75 5114,864.75 0.00 SO 00 20 PVC Sanitary Sewer 121n Dia 2049 LF _ $8000 0163,92000 1,98400 9683% $158,720 00 $158,720 00 0.00 $0.00 21 PVC Sandary Sewer 10 In.Diu _ 58_LF _ $69 00 $4,002 00 58 00 100.00% $4,002.00 $4,002.00 0.00 $0 00 22 PVC Sanitary Sewer 8 In.Da 703 LF 059 00 541.477 00 749.50 106 61% $44,220.50 $44,220 50 0.00 $0.00 23 Sewer Cleanout _ 13 EA $635 00 $8255 00 6 00 46.15% $3,810.00 $3,810.00_ 0.00 $0.00 24 Sewer Meter Vault 1 LS $8.600.00 08.600 00 1 00 100.00% $8,600.00 $8,600.00 0.00 $0.00 r - 'v Pay F Ornate#19 _ QUANTITY ESTIMATE TG QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT DUE THIS ITEM NO DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE AMI,.,.. DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE - 25 Supply Sewer Meter And Chart Recorder 1 LS $44,000.00 $44,000 00 1.00 - 100.00% $44,000.00 544.000.00 0 00 $0.00 900 Materials On-Hand Sewer NA LS $100 NA 0.00 NA $0.00 $000 0.00 50.00 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE B: 848,284.80 847,894.80 390.00 5370 50 SALES TAX(8.8%): 74,649.08 $74,014 76 34 32 SALES TAX INCREASE TO 89%-ADD 1%AS OF 04101/07 2284 22.45 039 SALES TAX INCREASE TO 90%-ADD 1%AS OF 04101108 0.39 000 0.39 TOTAL SCHEDULE B. 922,957.11 922,532.01 425.10 RETAINAGE(5%before tax). 42,414 25 $42,394 75 19.50 NET PAYMENT SCHEDULE B' 880,542.86 880,137.26 405 60 BID SCHEDULE C-WATER LINE QUANTITY ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE TOTAL BID QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS THIS AMOUNT DUE THIS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE 01 Contractor Supplied Surveying 1 LS $12,100.00 $12,10000_ 1.00 100.00% $12,100.00 811,495.00 0.05 8605.00 02 Mobilization 1 LS $6,500.00 $5,500.00 1.00 100.00% $5,500.00 $5,500.00 0,00 $0.00 03 Demolish Miscelaneous Water Facilities 1 LS $29,000.00 029,000.00 1.00 100.00% $29,000.00 $29,000.00 0.00 $0.00 04 Construction Geolexlile For Sot Stabilization 1300 SY $2.16 $2,808.00 208.49 16.04% $450.34 $450.34 0.00 50.00 - 05 AC Pavement Removal And Palching 360 SY $12.80 $4,60800 249.98 6944% $3,199.74 $3,199.74 0.00 $0.00 06 Bank Run Gravel For Trench BackfIll 6500 TON $19.00 $123,500.00 3,481.91 , 53.57% $66,156.29 566,158.29 0.00 $0.00 07 Controlled Density Fill 250 CY $93.60 523,400.00 0.00 0.00% 50.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 08 Removal Of Unsuitable Foundation Material 300 CY $31 00 $9,300 00 47.90 15.97% $1,484.90 $1,484 90 0.00 50.00 09 Foundation Stabdlzalion Material 400 TON $30.00 $12,000.00 80.36 20.09% $2,410.80 52,410.80 0 00 $0.00 10 Non-Slruclural Shoring Or Extra Excavation 51000 SF $1.74 $88,740 00 24,078.26 47,21% $41,896.17 $41,896 17 0.00 $0.00 11 Structural Shoring 6100 SF $2.18 $13,298.00 0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 12 Culling,Plugging Existing Pipes 1 LS 511.31000 811,31000 1.00 100.00% $11,310.00 $11,310.00 0.00 $0.00 Ductile Iron Pipe for Water Main and 13 Fittmos 12 in.Dia 9515 LF $66 80 $635,602 00 8,863.70 93 16% 5592,095.16 5592,095 16 0.00 $0.00 14 Connection to Existing Water Main 4 EA 53,410.00 $13,640.00 4.00 100.00% $13,640.00 513,640 00 0.00 50.00 15(C010) Crossing Under Other Utility 14 EA $3.990.00 555,860.00 10.00 71.43% $39.900.00 $39,900.00 0.00 $0.00 16 Blow-OH Assembly 8 EA $1,950.05 $15,600.00 10.00 125.00% $19,500.00 $19,500.00 0.00 $0.00 17 Gate Valve 121n,Assembly 53 EA $2,005.00 5106,265.00 56.00 105.66% $112,280.00 0112,280.00 0.00 $0.00 18 Hydrant Assembly 38 EA 54,055.00 $154,090.00 38.00 100.00% 5154,090.00 5154,090.00 0.00 $0.00 19 Item not used NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.00 50.00 20(CO3) 12"Field Lock Gaskets 275 EA $136.17 $37,446.75 321 00 116.73% $43,710.57 $43,710.57 0.00 50.00 21(003) 8'Field Lock Gaskets 25 EA , $82.27 $2,056.75 1 00 4,00% J $8227 $82.27 0.00 $0.00 22(003) 6-Field Lock Gaskets 5 EA 561,58 5307.90 7.00 140.00% $431.06 5431.06 0.00 S0 00 23IC03) 4"Field Lock Gaskell 5 EA $43.17 5215.85 0 00 0.00% $0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 24(003) 12"Mega-Lug Restrainers 40 EA $99.45 $3,978.00 220.00 550.00% $21,879.00 $21,879.00 0.00 $0,00 25(003) 8"Mega-Lug Restrainers 10 EA $57.58 $575.80 2.00 20.00% $115.16 $115.18 000 $0.00 28(CO3) 6"Mega-Lug Restrainers 5 EA 539.82 $19910 48.00 960.00% $1,911.36 $1,911.36 000 50.00 27(CO3) 4'Maga-Lug Restrainers 5 EA 530.62 $153.10 0.50 000% $0.00 $000 0.00 50.00 900 Materials On-Hand:Water Line NA LS $1.00 NA 0.00 NA $0.00 $0.00 0 00 50.00 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE C' 1,173,142.82 1.172,537 82 605.00 SALES TAX(8.8%): 103,236.58 5103,183 34 53.24 SALES TAX INCREASE TO 8.9%-ADD.1%AS OF 04/01/07 118.88 118.27 0.61 SALES TAX INCREASE TO 9.0%-ADD.1%AS OF 04/01/08 0.61 0.00 0.61 TOTAL SCHEDULE C: 1.276,490.89 1,275,839.43 659 46 RETAINAGE(5%before tax): 58,657,15 $59,626.90 30.25 NET PAYMENT SCHEDULE C. 1,217,841.74 1,217,212.53 629.21 BID SCHEDULE D-JOINT TRENCH QUANTITY ESTIMATE TOTAL BID QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT DUE THIS ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE 01 Contractor Supplied Surveying 1 LS 82,200.00 $2,200.00 1.00 100.00% $2,200.00 $2,090.00 0.05 5110.00 02 Mobilization 1 LS $21,572.00 $21,572.00 1.00 100.00% 521,572.00 $21,572.00 0.00 $000 03 Non-Structural Shoring Or Extra Excavation 50000 SF $1.10 $55,000.00_ 45,146.88 90.29% $49,661.57 $49,661.57 0.00 $0.00 04 Trench Excavation 11000 CY $10.37 $114.070.00 11,19922 101.81% $116,135.91 5116,13591 000 $0.00 Pay Estimate#19 g ESTIMATE TOTAL BID QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS QUANTITY AMOUNT DUE THIS ITEM NO DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT PRICE THIS • QUANTITY AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE 05 Trench Spoil Backfill 4000 CY $14.80 $59,200.00 3,413.16 85.33% $50,514.77 $50,514 77 000 $0 00 06 Sand Bedding 3500 TON $21.80 $76,300.00 7,444 84 212.71% $162,297.51 $162,297.51 0.00 $0 00 07 Fluklized Thermal Backfill 1600 CY $135.00 $216,00000 1272.00 79.50% $171,720.00 $171,720.00 000 $0.00 08 Install Qwest 4-Conduit 36200 LF $4 58 $165.796.00 45,362.00 1 125.31% $207,757.96, $207,757.96 0.00 $0.00 09 Install Qwest Vaults 1 LS $51,010.00_ $51,010.00 1 00 100.00% $51,010.00 $51,010.00 0.00 $0.00 10 Install Comcast 4"Conduit 9300 LF $4.58 $42,594.00 7,244.00 77.89% $33,177.52 $33,177.52 0.00 $000 11 Install Comcast 2"Conduit 9300 LF $3.70 $34,410.00 7,244.00 77.89% $26,802.80 $26,802.80 0.00 $0.00 12 Gravel Borrow Including Haul 200 TON $27.73 $5,546.00 2,817.49 1308.75% $72,583.00 $72,583.00 0.00 $0.00 13(CO22) Minor Change-Joint Trench 1 FA $25,000.00 $25,000.00 156,057.67 624.23% $156,057.67 $156,057.67 0.00 $0.00 14(C08) Additional Fairfield Wel Utilities 1 LS $77,399.93 577,399.93 1.00 100.00% 577,399.93 $77,399.93 0.00 80.00 15(C08) Additional 10-Inch Water Stub on 10th 1 LS $14,612.00 $14,612 00 1.00 100.00% $14,612.00 $14,612.00 0 00 $0.00 16(CO8) Revision to Storm Drain L-15 1 LS $16,236.00 $16,236.00 1.00 100.00% _ $16,236.00 $16,236.00 0.00 $0.00 17(C08) Additional 8-inch Water Stub on N.8th St. 1 LS $9,213.54 $9.213 54 1 00 100.00% $9213.54 $9,213.54 0.00 $0.00 Additional 2-inch Water Serice on N 10th SI.and 2- i 18(C08) Inch Water Service on Logan Ave. 1 LS $18,849.00 518,84900 1 00 _ 100.00% $18,849.00518,849.00_ 0.00 $0.00 Additional 10-Inch Water Stub on N 10th St.for - 19(C08) Lot 1 _ 1 LS $12,961.44 $12,961.44 100 100.00% 512,961.44 $12,961.44 0.00 5000 Additional 6-Inch Sanitary Sewer Stub on N.10th - - 20(CO8) St. 1 LS $28,800.65 $28,800.65 1.00 I 100.00% $28,800.65 $28,800.65 0.00 $0.00 TOTAL SCHEDULED: 1,299,563.27 1,299,453.27 110.00 RETAINAGE(5%before tax): 64,978.16 64,972.66 550 NET PAYMENT SCHEDULE D. 1,234,585.11 1.234,480.61 104 50 BID SCHEDULE E-WSDOT LIMITED ACCESS AREA QUANTITY ITEM NO DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE TOTAL BID QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT DUE THIS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE THIS AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT ESTIMATE _ ESTIMATE 01 Contractor Supplied Surveying 1 LS 02,200 00 $2200.00 1.00 100 00% $2200.00 $2,090.00 0 05 5110.00 02 Mobilization 1 LS $2,200.00 $2,200.00 100 100 00% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.00 $0.00 03 Asphalt Concrete Pavement Removal 42 SY 522.50 $945 00 208.30 495.95% $4,686.75 $4,688.75 0 00 $0.00 04 Sidewalk Removal 156 SY $33.50 $5,226.00 156.00 100 00% $5,226.00 $5,228.00 0.00 $0.00 05 Curb Gutter Removal _. 135 SY $4 50 $607 50 135 00 100.00% $807.50 5607.50 0.00 $0.00_ 06 Crushed Surfacing Top Course 20 TON $38.00 $760 00 20.00 100 00% $760.00 $760.00 0.00 $0.00_ 07 Hot Ma Asphalt Class 1/2"PG 58-22 100 TON $135.94,. $13,594.00 100.59 100 59% $13,674.20 $13,674.20 0.00 $0.00 08 Cement Conc.Traffic Curb 530 LF r $18.37 $9,736.10 0 00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 09 Cement Concrete Traffic Curb and Gutter 160 LF $12.63 $2,020.80 140.00 87.50% $1,768.20 $1,768.20 0.00 50.00 10 Type C Block Traffic Curb 84 LF $11.42 $959.28 449.10 534.64% $5,128.72' $5,128.72 0 00 $0 00 11 Raised Pavement Marker,Type 1 7.4 HUNG $217.51 $1.609 57 740 100.00% $1,609.57 $1,609.57 0.00 $0.00 12 Raised Pavement Markers.Type 2 0.9 HUND $299.08 $268 17 0.90 100.00% $269.17 $269.17 0.00 50.00 13 Cement Conc.Sidewalk Ramp Type 1 B 3 EA $1,214.33 53,642.99 3.00 100.00% $3,642.99 $3,642.99 0.00 50.00 14 Cement Conc.Sidewalk 140 SY $33.09 $4,632.60 20429 145.92% $6,759.96 $6,759.96 0.00 $0.00 Upgrade Traffic Signal Syst.Complete 15 (Park/Garden) 1 LS 53,344 93 $3,344.93 1.00 100.00% 53,344.93 53,344.93 0.00 $0.00 16 Paint Line 365 LF $0.16 $58.40 365.00 100.00% $58.40 $58.40 0.00 $0.00 17 Plastic Crosswalk Line 340 SF $2.73 $928.20 340.00 100.00% $92820 $928.20 0.00 $0.00 18 Plastic Slop Line 110 LF $3.55 $390.50 110.00 100.00% 8390.50 $390.50 0.00 $0.00 19 Plastic Traffic Arrow _ 12 EA $60.11 $721 32 12.00 100.00% $721.32 $721.32 0.00 $0.00 20 Plastic Traffic Letter 12 EA $28.41 $340.92 12.00 100.00% 8340.92 5340.92 0.00 $0.00 21 Temporary Pavement Markings 1700 LF $0.16 $272.00 1,400.00 82.35% $224.00 $224.00 0.00 $0.00 22 Remove Temporary Pavement Markings 1700 LF $0.44 $748.00 1,400.00 82.35% $616.00 861600 0.00 50.00 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE E: 55,157.33 55,047.33 110.00 SALES TAX(8.8%): 4.853.85 4,844.17 9.68 SALES TAX INCREASE TO 8.9%-ADD.1%AS OF 04/01/07 54.44 54.33 0.11 SALES TAX INCREASE TO 9.0%•ADO.1%AS OF 04/01/08 -1.42 -1.53 0.11 TOTAL SCHEDULE E. 60,064.20 59,944.30 119.90 RETAINAGE(5%before lax). 2,757,87 2,752.37 5.50 NET PAYMENT SCHEDULE E 57,306.33 57,191.93 114.40 ) ) ) ITEM NO DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE UNITS UNIT PRICE TC QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS THIS QUANTITY AL DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT ESTIMATE I ESTIMATE BID SCHEDULE F-GARDEN AVENUE NORTH IMPROVEMENTS QUANTITY ESTIMATE TOTAL 870 QUANTITY TO PERCENT TOTAL AMOUNT PREVIOUS AMOUNT DUE THIS ITEM NO DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE AMOUNT DATE COMPLETE TO DATE AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE 81 Contractor Supplied Surveying 1 LS $3,800.00 $3,800.00 1 00 100.00% 53,800,00 53,610.00 0.05 $190.00 02 Adjust UI88y to Grade 1 EA $447.50 $447.50 1.00 100.00% $447.50 50.00 1.00 $447 50 03 Mobilization 1 LS $2,200.00 $2,200.00 1.00 100.00% _ $2,200.00 12.200.00 0.00 $0 00 04 Traffic Control Labor 240 HR $39.02 $9,364.80 326,50 136.04% $12,740.03 $12,740.03 0.00 $0.00_ 05 Project Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS $5,500.00 55,500.00 1.00 100.00% $5,500.00 $5,500.00 0.00 50.00 08 Sawcut 231 LF $7.00 $1,617.00 166.00 71.86% 51,182.00 $1,162.00 0.00 $0.00^ 07 Curb Culler Removal 491 SY $5.00 $2,455.00_ 662.00 134.83% $3,310.00 $3,310.00 0.00 $0.00 05 Roadway Excavation Incl.Haul 420 CY 523.00 59,660.00 420.00 100.00% $9,660.00 $9,660.00 0.00 $0.00 09 Sidewalk Removal 271 SY $13.50 $3,658.50 271.00 100.00% _ $3,658.50 $3,658.50 0 00 50.00 10 Removal Of Structure And Obstruction 1 LS $11,000.00 511,00000 1.00 100.00% _ 511,000.00 $11,000.00 0.00 $0.00 II Crushed Surfacing Top Course 530 TON $35.30 $18,709 00 96.81 18.27% 53,417.39 $3,417.39 0.00 $0.00 12 HMA Cl.112 In.PG 64-22 270 TON 5135.94 538,703.80 192.03 71,12% 528,104.56 $28,104.58 0.00 $0.00 13 Cement Concrete Pavement-Including Dowels 68 CY $243.17 $16,535 56 28.60 _ 42.06% 96,954.66 $6,954.66 0.00 $0.00 14 Storm Drain Pipe,12 In.Dia(DI) 80 LF $69.10 $5528.00 23.00 28.75% $1,589.30 51,589.30 0.00 $0.00 15Catch Basin Type 1 3 EA 01,662.00 $4.986.00 1 00 33 33% $1,662.00 $1,662.00 0.00 $0.00 18 1 Relocate Hydrant Assembly 1 LS 53,613.00 $3,613.00 1.00 100 00% 53,613.00 50.00 1.00 $3,613.00 IT Cement Conc.Traffic Curb 81 LF $18.36 51,487.16 0.00 0.00% $0.00 00.00 0.00 0000 16 Cement Concrete Traffic Curb and Gutter 521 LF $12.63 $6,580.23 503.10 96.56% $8,354.15 $6,354.15 0.00 $0 00 19 Cement Conc.SIdewalk Ramp Type lB 10 EA $1,214.33 $12,143.30 10.00 _ 100.00% $12,143.30 $12,143.30 0.00 50.00 20 Cement Conc.Sidewalk 545 SY $33 05 $18,034.05 234.23 42.98% - 57,750.67 57,750.67 0.00 50 00 21 New Traffic Signal Complete(Garden/10th{ 1 LS $174,417,76 5174,417.76 1.00 100 00% $174,417.76 $174,417.76 0.00 50.00 22 Revise Traffic Signal Complete(Garden/8th East) 1 LS $9,231.81 $9,231.81 1.00 100.00% $9,231.81 $9,231.81 0.00 $0.00 23 Paint Line 78 LF $0.16 512.48 0.00 0.00% 80.00 $0.00 0 00 $0.00 24 Plastic Crosswalk Line 467 SF $2.72_ 51,270.24 23667 50.68% $643.74 5643.74 0.00 $0.00 25 Plastic Stop Line 92 LF 03 53 $324.76 22.00 23.91% $77.68 $77,66 0.00 $0.00 26 Plastic Traffic Arrow 1 EA $55.81 $59.81 1.00 100.00% 55981 $59.81 0.00 50.00 TOTAL SCHEDULE F' 307,497.84 303,247.34 4,250.50 RETAINAGE(5%before tax): 15,374.69 15,162.37 212.53 NET PAYMENT SCHEDULE F: 292,122.95 288,084.97 4.037.97 SUBTOTAL ALL SCHEDULES: 28090,722.18 19,891,551.48 199,170.70 SALES TAX(6.8•/.): 182,739.50 182,842.26 97.24 SALES TAX INCREASE TO 8.9%-ADD.1%AS OF 04/01)07 196.16 195.05 1,11 SALES TAX INCREASE TO 9.0%.ADD.1%AS OF 04/01108 -0.42 -1,53 1.11 TOTAL ALL SCHEDULES: 20,273,657.42 20,074,387.26 199,270.16 RETAINAGE: 1,004,536.15 994,577.61 9,958.54 NET PAYMENT: 19,269,143.72 19,079,832,10 189,311.62 South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Ceccanti Contract KOAbWSOUS LAKEEWf,§111NGoTO :13(409t.:;.',::,,,,,, ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT A pRO E - z R0 131N R Obi _$ 1�i ,,atNi $15;715,721.62 it .;-:.14:4600;v1;- $60,0 6 5.52 f. G Ew3 30 $359,339.76W9T8R S✓73wINAg I 824 6= , r� ?r ``� C11E $1"43 $1;033722,94Qr;OINTTRErCg .,SC1�E� Ll � �$$8 b��$838,15200 . *100%reimbursed by Developer ENC .01347 76.4:0( �®� , `Total $20,791,586.60 $19,443,826.60 $20,273,65242 Ni.r illi►" A., STATA+O� State of Washington Reg.No.: 04 Department of Revenue Audit Procedures&Administration 1889��y" PO Box 47474 Date: September 28,2008 Olympia,Washington 98504-7474 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: City of Renton DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Tracy Schuld Assigned To 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Date Assigned Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Contractor's Name Telephone No. (253)537-2990 Contractor's Address 4116 Brookdale Road E, Tacoma, WA 98466 Work Date Commenced ly 10, C Date Work Completed June 29,2008 Date Work Accepted 6 September 28,2008 Surety or Bonding Co. Agent's Address Contract Amount: $19,239,144.66(w/o sales tax) Amount Disbursed: $20,273,657.42 Additions or Reductions: $+851,577.52 Amount Retained: $0.00(Retainage Bond) Sales Tax: $182,935.24 Total: $20,273,657.42 Total $20,273,657.42 By (Disbursing Officer) Phone No: The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504- 7474,immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate,and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 31 0020(12-92) 11:1Division.s\TRANSpOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\Rob\Boeing Redevelopment\Construction\Closeout\Notice_of Completion.doe CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: 7s* ki, Submitting Data: Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems October 6, 2008 Staff Contact James Wilhoit (ext. 7391) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. NE 4th Street and Hoquiam Avenue NE Signal Ordinance Improvement Project, CAG 07-134 Resolution TransTech Electric, Inc. Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Study Sessions Final Pay Estimate Information Notice of Completion Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: (T12209/fO10/0018/0002) 1/41.00 Expenditure Required... $14,730.82 (retainage funds) Transfer/Amendment. N/A Amount Budgeted $396,072 Revenue Generated -0- Total Project Budget $396,072 City Share 100% SUMMARY OF ACTION: The project started on October 22, 2007, and was completed on April 17,2008. The original contract amount was $289,295.00. The final contract amount is$ 294,616.37, an increase of$5,321.37 over the original contract amount. Change Order#1 added$5,763.06 to the contract amount;however, net under- runs in quantities of materials reduced the increase from the original change order amount by$441.69,to $5,321.37. Pay Estimate#6 in the amount of$41,805.06 was paid in May 2008, completing payment for all items of work except for the withheld retainage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept completion of the project and release retainage for the full project in the total amount of $14,730.82 after 60 days, subject to the required authorization. ttare H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\jwilhoit\4th&hqm\construction\4thhgmFinalPayAGENDA BILL.doc TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR - 5/8/2008 FROM: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR CONTRACTOR: TransTech,Inc. ‘4010' CONTRACT NO. CAG#07-134 ESTIMA IE NO. 6 PROJECT: NE 4th St&Hoquiam Ave NE Signal Improvement Project 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $ 41,805.06 2. SALES TAX @ N/A $ - 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMA 1'h $ 41,805.06 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $ 240,170.74 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $ 39,714.81 6. SUBTOTAL-CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS $ 279,885.55 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS $ 12,640.57 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $ 2,090.25 9. SUBTOTAL-RETAINAGE $ 14,730.82 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $ - 12. SUBTOTAL-SALES TAX $* (95%xLINEJ) ** (RETAINAGE:: 5%) GRAND TOTAL: $ 294,616.37 G'�V FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR(Lines 5 and 11): / � ACCOUNT T12209/f010/0018/0002 ��/��D $ 39,714.81 Mq y o 9oo8 RETAINED AMOUNT(Line 8): C%ly Of P ACCOUNT T12209/f010/0018/0002 ' oun ayab/0 $ 2,090.25 TOTAL THIS ESTIMA 1'h: $ 41,805.06 Ai n,� CHARTER 116,LAWS OF 1965 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION I,THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY,THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED,THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN,AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST,DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON,AND THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM SIGNED: 4//// ) ) 1 3/13/2008 City of Renton -Transportation Page: 1 2:22 pm NE 4th St. / Hoquiam Avenue NE Signalization Daily Activity Report Project Number: 012209 Vendor: ,ra , .j Eor .., '. , y en Contract No: CAG07-134 - Bid Date: 7/31/2007 2:30PM 1• `x `` J N% Funding No. ^f,, z. PO Number: , 3/13/2008 City of Renton -Transportation Page: 2 2:22 pm NE 4th St. / Hoquiam Avenue NE Signalization Daily Activity Report Project Number: 012209 Vendor: Tran§t Contract No: CAGO7-134 tsch�Elettiic.lnc, . 9012;S203th`St:'- ``.`::; Bid Date: 7/31/2007 2:30PM 1 . _':,• Funding No. KentWA� 8031'?; , PO Number: Phone`: . Funding ID Funding Source System/Line Unit/Detail Station Start Station End Qty Completed Sheet-No North Leg Const Nt 2 HQM 10+60 LT HQM 10+60 RT 90.0000 Cl South Leg Const Nt 2 HQM 9+45 LT HQM 9+45 RT 80.0000 Cl East Leg Const Nt 2 32+93 LT 32+93 RT 178.0000 Cl West Leg Const Nt 2 32+06 LT 32+06 RT 181.0000,Cl 22 Raised Pavement Marker,Type 1 494.0000 EA 323.0000 323.0000 494.0000 Funding ID Funding Source System/Line Unit/Detail Station Start Station End Qty Completed Sheet-No _ I I N,W&E Legs (Const Nt 1 I 323.00001 C1,RD1 I 23 4"Raised Pavement Marker Type2d,Yellow 44.0000 EA 36.0000 36.0000 44.0000 Funding ID Funding Source System/Line Unit/Detail Station Start Station End Qty Completed Sheet-No N,W&E Legs Const Nt 1 36.0000 Cl,RD1 I 24 4"Raised Pavement Marker Type 2e,White 28.0000 EA 18.0000 18.0000 28.0000 Funding ID Funding Source System/Line Unit/Detail Station Start L Station End_ Qty Completed Sheet-No i N,W&E Legs Const Nt 1 I I I 18.0000 Cl, RD1 I • Run By: James P.Wilhoit Generated by aSharpeSofProduct • 4/21/2008 ) City of Renton )ansportation ): 1 10:17 am NE 4th St. / Hoquiam Avenue NE Signalization Daily Activity Report Project Number: 012209 Vendor: Contract No: CAG07-134 9..;10) .4.101,A+i"..*.,, ''7,',•*'' "tzt.r.4,='-`, Bid Date: 7/31/2007 2:30PM ..-T„,"*..7*":1.s' ' ''•;:t:.*; .:,, . • ,;'—.2-1,N, v.0.4-, - • • •,, ...-0...:'-, • <.,,,,,044,441;‘• Funding No. ,It.t01 .4dA.,i114`eit • ';,t-';',0.• *:,*4 :k'.‘,'1,4 `,:iil?".,r1 .,., .•l's:tA„.z .. '.....47 .4,,,,k* PO Number: Date: 3/31/2008 Quantity UM TodaytQty Qty to Date Projected Est.Quantity Bid Items 05 Project Temporary Traffic Control 1.0000 LS 0.2000 0.9000 1.0000 Funding ID Funding Source System/Line Unit/Detail Station Start Station End Qty Completed Sheet-No 0.2000 18 Traffic Signal System 1.0000 LS 0.1000 1.0000 1.0000 Funding ID Funding Source System/Line Unit/Detail Station Start Station End Qty Completed Sheet-No 0.1000 Run By: James P.Wilhoit * Generated by a SharpeSoft Product 4``2t7C0' city of Renton-Transportation ova: 1 1::13 ern NE 4th St.!Hoquiam Avenue NE Signalization Project Humber: 01220Daily Activity Report Vendor: TraistadtAtedIC7rrc ; Contract Ho: CAG07-134 E1125 DX*St BIO Data: 7V31!200? 2:30P1i i Funding No. herr WA 3E031 PO Number. Photo: I Data: 3131r23O3 ca tMtlty Uhl Toaays Oty Qty to Deco motto Est Quantity DUditem ar rect rrrrpnrssw ram Corcrer 1<M O I.S (1.= O, ,0 1.O:M r Pomona 10 , funrnna Source Sutra/Lino UnIt'Detali Stsllorj Stott Stattoo OKI Qtv Comoistsd Shat-No 12%):Q 1.$ Trauto Venal Dyster:i 1y1t:0 1.$ 0.10 1 1.d;W PonOtnn ID fvndina Source $vetenuUlne UnIt7Delolt Station Sart Patron EA(' Qt&Comvlstsd $twttio ff :.M:O End of Mo. Totals Traffic Control- All work 100% complete Traffic Signal System- All work 100% complete ) ) ) iii 1 ) W 1 �_I, L 9 s—roe Q.6 2 _ _ f r `c ^��.7 i >s( CGNSiRt9Ck?l4'i t(T7ES F .. ii 1 (I [h:SYCI'LL,<I,CIN the 1!4.in'M�MigNY yYOLION: :A.,yy3r MJ1 }�, .+f M£ASvR-E� L6NlrTyic SI -, �'" 'wt; I - rl"fL;Kh�,.,s,. ;..t,.waor/Ai,„11r:1+r,t„AKw:„r.�.,,.;,101 r A. ••a. 0• �-� !''RI` • �. H,g ' j .{ �%} +' .rLMO'.r i15:kr.MICR!Jr.N17:YAlY r1V.'lS MO:RA.F::CIM MO WOO, n' 'TO-CAA_ 7 r itZ. Zv F9 Ft L o W - 3' (� r Co r 9DA,..:..,w r,?VFW Durr,ra.a;r 6 n ow.=row/w e A'S.. R..vae n�'NuurKy w STP Lre PER tar ar NoeNro Sly.Pini Woo ! d RAW MFP.av71 Live per I.1F:17Nr N.nVYfar;J.O.2F'Nor J—� N /g R6 e s .G I C l.� �t7aq C. x j I. } >c a ne .o nm:r R.WoDir rMr xc 81 13 = eriftLS W626 ALGA / I N esAce. 1 1 i ; s r ; Merv:.Mee'CovaCtr SNV:otX Mt 1\•3616 Sfii.R.w r-1 11lSIMl --« 6 4 a -H( R`S I i 4 1 ;1 t r +`s u i NMlX f.Vtl SIC QlrlLN:PW,WO;sin n.N F.-I. air4C2 CAI POO nri Ai PLR noor 5”n.AA*Pte. zr ♦ 'j ` ♦bT �/ ; h 1� , fih )1!" STA 1 Pc S % sctr;,: .nr.l�Pr n.rw w�c rwa....I'd aiw.c N j� . 21 P Lrs r„t IG /�1n1.-L< STI�IPE i !'•i-. rR / Z r� 8 01.$7 1,rirzwrgFcre+Kt+wrrauN�e'KN.OPl �,w/nc.r N (.1 `��_ I Iq :.' 1"rr /��-7 �-t. �l� g,'hlf1C CO'f S7Q TLMS Xae4.k:117.k.NS N0f2 NDt7 RMJ Kali Mt 2 C ( LLL P. P�MaSRs c STR1 Pry 5KowN ; ,: TfCII�j NctaNwt . a Pdr v:c Ti 7 = wY Q�(Z co2 S 7o P,.aJ !U l ZCA rQ7ttQQlh� � t 'fiuI. 1 i;Jr. ___ l Marron,,;; =qv F �, �•vi,i G� .57/L 1 t a .= 6-7 SF. :=Nf wemarr -_.— '`•' 1 r ,v soak.,nvY; �l t r;; ' D' 28 2'66 Y{ `„et brl*.A(Y)Chd ti.:R,', t1 ]t$ y T ifir . . r ms.sti ~~ �' rfnfM,IF„de i1` j �ai("a f dw ? yl � '4(.. ''''' s}' r1.-41 'l-ti .:...k,,,, 1' 10..,1 , xrv: aix.:>.wt1(J�( i ^ a� ,1.^y^_ 'in-M- -Y...M-w w..h w._n.._, '.�,S.RY ri ,S",R ,11.��'tp,w e- •�' C .`, .1...t II�71MA r,516.N7 E �.'.iY{.'o t e •-• r,_.____,. ;�....._.....,....... �w.i3 »f-e '-`--,1—i-\ Qi'- -r=Y-, .-_.>, _-..,.:....:_ ........z-- w,.._�..„_x'.';R,,,,/a •r Y t.� x n < ._•__.��.�-.* ----=-�«»='T..,-._..,�:..,�, ..._.__...,...,..._.._._:�::1-P_�.. , o-,�t. .'"."----`..' ... ._... '�r...`. �� 'rte:. "��C.�.�y�-'--' =.;i- ,i: r” :./lit4th sr x(of elE: - -- �,- ._ ,. r i 1 , i r ; 7.,...../,.....-:,._,..... .;-:_::::-...,..-.7...: ;-"-..., :,....,....;..::4.......,, :_-,,,-;.:: :::..........i........_izz..-i- \., te)_ y may' :� _- -: __.-_-_- n -_- -. ,.,. ��R ��i /\yam v "1=":_�ti`hrr`_.�..,;1,,,, 'n + dYir M ...._, Imo. • V `I - ... d5'rJ�'a: ._ .h �,.•.�"-:.�.:.. ;.-.y:--'"«« .i '4‘ ...4.,-,-... C- yam. :� f, .. i .' sEEr.'} yaa� I. ' J1 . 1 SIGN N9 E$ Is 92t I r,r��3} (2 e� iY,$.SS'a 0 9!iloiN V?,srx 745;4.4f.at-nER A.'„CCD ` 1 , i 1 € t (YrgFDOM'Ri LY'.I4",.:. irY, S ` ` _ _ 1 1 I,, \5 -f > I `a- Nr,Y10Oil Oiler#0,*VOr'Yi O'7k2A[R A. --- --- 31 ii tvY atw'.'rrrroarrruraxtattSash, - t es. . ::' 1...I..'i0 acu > .,' QPM s w u>n Qy r �'�t�R_d� . O a f -.-,�i ; Z i2iPE IL ::v' X r 7 e LrAY,Y%Ar'1gtLN hY.E.FO' 1. . P,Z zz --t—/P " I'S 313 — ,Sc F 1 f ,: :44 ioi i r'. 2 2.e 'W t I e wow{f llrl� 2 3/I 2../og pc m dvA-L I "it-7/115 CONSTRUCTION NOTES ,.:i.i r.:,- :,!puP,) , . ,-....., , . r, • 6)r,....,.....CANTER 45S Ko,M00033 33030W..Mi"....TwUr Jena 6_,I. 9 Rt4v -rkeiFFI c twtrz K IN 6-c \\ "Nci,- 1 4 . , ,. •,.t 15>.• Z _ ''b. N'''•' - 0 /fgok 74.,)10.1,A;fts asms.s:e AN•Awkwie[.3.1330301:310.SICCI RO. ,..... i., ,. ...,L, .01 „..;aorow alraa 02336;3:1E'.k7a00(PANELS AAD W3007 CAA.A0.GLitTER. \, pg".001.3.,0w arr aw3M AATWIr Fr.0fl Cr 30,303.sro.rrArr roar a-1 ,,,:r iij...r q ril , 23 413.24 PRIRIONASS:STOP 1...f KA AFT 4.1,froir0v SM.131.13064 ..l 4 1 . . , "41. 1 .I. i. t . MN:0 F tia.thij.? ()00.....000.03 L.W.• 3.001033 361.0%.X.64..9.grr PO! i rs------,----, ki)/POW M013032101403.0 ..:Ckit IN Far $• I 14 145,: . 1'1. i :.4: 1 I NO,j Crb.0srAti.coo/rooter sotTAISK P 'AMOT.SM.,P1./711,-.1 0574C C2..42,1.0***IC,110120 Z02,11.030 t-qtarepcylktbr;tre,,rurrr-r. orSrro.494.t.corierrvir ago Remo rrrg Be Par arscar vro.AA,.,-.A. ' t p 1 orrsrPR';Pea...,ill r Aorruer..........ra ra aorot ,.), Cf(7.') I 1 '• f '''' ' 1 t -i-: TA/Rt.Ma''gar autax.Ft Pot Cat SMA K.12040 Cl_m ' 1 t" - . i '1 rf) aOLIZC GUM 30 PLANS 003,AMV.K001,,AVM 3,1$00 Wa MO 1 0 • P-1,.: . .,.., Z.ii 1 i 1 ,„... s. -I • `-- Fog TwrIC camta.alltrIC X335122,7`XS: • i '''' k it ,. :: 0.2ALEArir.. .,„,..." 1, ___............ .* , ,rs',,q,MIMI• I ---- liti* ' r r.iiirtakr..7„..0: -,Ne,...:._. 4 ,}:44,,w.. I 034.309.3.333,ig:'0, 1-1 0.gi ,,-....:-..L,--...... 411f.1' H , 00.,.0..a..e__ 4.,,It it • I, 492*4----,,,,, -:- . S'Af n 1 x ' ' '`,71,4f -NY-%. .. vo-.0- •e .e,.,.... trititiortmgr,...- .„,,,t„,k ,..,,C;,,,,,.. - A---•' kkkj,', '-I . -.*;,tl: '0' .it.-„,-;.ri„ __......„‘„.,e,_:........,,:.:,..........„-,,:,....,,,i.„,,• .„ ,. ...,.... _„„,,,.:, iitsv., ..,,,,,,,,:. • :, t , .,so. - • • — , . ,. • 4 i, t-... ..,,,,-.... .,„..----_ .,....":„.„.._:"...,..„-„,„...„,_ 9..-", i f• , .. 104; r ‘, 0 _, ,ii,> f•-•.: • •,, . . 4 , ------r:: .:k r _,_,_,......,.....-,—....-.---_-_,„÷, ... .... 7--......:..-7...7--.:_7.....: ......i ...,..= ,),..1 „...,.4=4„.14k$74J2_,77,,,.,...L...., ........77.177.- -,E-'.,zi--•,-.7"-----.7.7-=-7-",-,k-.,--771:"---..I.....-..,,T,... ••,,,,-,, --. ,. •., NE 'ith ST V' * = (-2)------:k-.. .: . :...".. .. ...""...'''''.'""'""" r - .- - 1,44,..----- ' Am+. 0 1 1; ,.•'C:6.... 61.,: ... ''1a, (f.., .1 ,. „__, .._..- r . job , „......,,,- .---::-:::::-:•.....: T,....:1--.- ...,.;.. ;,..„.. "7"...-:-'::'..--- •— - -•- • • ' ______.--7.11. / 4 =,,. el .spit 1814.202 37, — ... ...- \ II • L....,__ . .. ,.-.. • ::: ...41 tIlltrir.c411111111 I tt.''4.... _. :;_..,...___:-......, „,---_------ , . --- .-,..-----7.-.•+4?-••--..t....--,,,,,,--.--..- •••'--"--:' .*---".. ---4 .* ..: .. - --. • .... • 2 tt---- --,5 _,_., .---- 4 . , . .__.. , .„ , , ." •_, ,.........„_._..,..„,„,„",,,.;,,• .,...... . _,....„. .,.____ 114 ri---- .1 i” - , ,.,, ,..., ...,, , • , . ( _,,,,,,,„. , , ,'. .,,- . 1 .,.,,g\ ..., _ $-T.Ikm./ --rmr-Ft c... wc6-5 i it RA V' (-7-t-i4 3-1 gra,' 444 , ,,,, ! ; (1,,=.,;f-,,.--.., --__. , + , i 4. II; °" ,1 .. • '.------'4---' °' 1 ci 14 t e:110 .. • 1 1V1 z3 ,z1V -, • . CTOP 8ARS f e :111,)it),6 ,...,4„,.[. ......... ... ;i ._. / : ` SIGN NOTES 94":4•3.fix / S- 1 gf I( I II ,qt,ab. 1 I 4 . L__ , is..,, . : , 0 *WK.31.1nAllIrr:r9Sr 00 DelrW20 2q,1.2%( I " ' (2) ,:cr001101 2001241.001100.01.910P. II 0, /warm-sg.ft-r!WIC SUM AND CCPWM W.5300 ----7 /02. .1'..F ti ... , . , ,c.r...rurrav 1D rirr 13047£33113Ct$33fkm r .. ! \I i ET Abri n'Z' "L' ,, • ...-... .., ! '----. PTd 1 . . "w-11-----NarhALfibt 416t,"erriatere tko t' . . . .. ..., i . ., • , 1:, ! -1•1(7)1 EMEnE SP . . 1 . , 4.. -• . . --- ___ 304, coi c6L4)17_, vy A rpi._ y..... 4 ,.._ 4..J..,v . rotte.:,Avliv A c_.c...-v-i-E,0 6,y ty. i , 1 0 1 /14\/ ite'lv) ) I ) Washington State v, Department of Transportation Daily Work Quantities Contract No. Prime Contractor Subcontractor Date ii2..- A2$�'�Gf-1 L:C -;e ,rSt,// - /4 - Z-, 1 ,.3. / 2 , Gam' Quantity Date BI Description Location((Line,It,rt, nb,etc,sta) State Contractor Notes Paid ccze-GL, 1)-1' / 744 _ ,s'.W / 1 LS z t, //? t-e. /o /9-/ e1 // -Sp . fo 12/Ge--/ 2,3 `lericjii c, JZe /o_ :30K _htizAvlul 2 if ,c7 'An ,P& leas- ' dL)y _ DOA1A; J WSDOT Inspector Contractor I I CURB LANE LANE I LANE CURB LANE CENTER CENTER I IN IN I LANE I LANE I IIIII liii !!IiI 10II I til 1 I I I I 6"MIN.(TYP.) I • III I I 24 I 8"(NP.)—STRIPE CONCRETE LANE (TYP.) I ,8 (NP.)—OPEN GUTTER LINE I LANE $ OYP.)—STRIPE ILINE f.if I I TIRE I TRACKS TIRE TIRE J kiikare TRACKS TRACKS TIRE TRACKS S . TYPICAL 4—LANE ROADWAY CONFIGURATION i 10 ,x g ,, ^ 6 , 7 5.F. 757glein R 0 1111 NOTE: FOR ROADWAYS WITH MORE OR LESS LANES, THE SAME CONFIGURATION APPLIES. KEEPING THE THERMOPLASTIC/PAINTED BARS CENTERED ON THE LANE UNES AND IN THE CENTER OF TRAVELLED PORTION OF THE Thermolactic LANE TO MINIMIZE THE WEAR ON THE THERMOPLASTIC/PAINT, P /Painted Crosswalk I G0 Y o� ADOPTED A I cur of RENTON _ �� D PLANS ins N TO S? DATE:04/04111 nATP -ec- DWG. NAME: H012 SP PAGE: H012 ) , , NOTES t...,.1;, .1•','...,-:, * ****** * •• • •. •• '.4. ,. no OTY Of PEW7D4 SIOCARC e...A.,.ff -1;i ..I 1,.;- ,..0.5' ,g224.6•21.117'Fr: .-T31- 1.- ,....,...wrAts •P-12.o-rs,..*-m.0-.2c...1_,...-21 J,44 02:0.21 ar.W.11121k.2 0 WPM.otnisoos 1 ,..-tri t OW 1,1,f Ild 2.AOR IK,O?S2.12•KlitA6....FM ANO 4..!IC SCr.4.60022,2 Ili 3.1.2&44.XIOWSIC245 a,.z EL,..e , i 1 C. . 2 .42A....CORY liatq.,,,IIPE f AO&ME 2 SNAG-VW I DOLIEILE 'YELLOW CENTER-LIN '1 1 1 5,-,•IA.004..mCC.orc 7*.io t g 21: ,,) • fltittsiftsitsstetc-L,r it 1 , •<2, Isi— • , ..,‘,...---tvspoc AV06./ .4.22k1 72 ROMA. 1:11--____2,2 .---•1\ ,, `-•.. t iL t .5..- ..246 14,44,.E.ni WA.), -,----.------- f5.. AP.P.IlaisZEUXE <4 • TYPICAL.ROADWAYSkurtlOt4 ,- VT ' ,f• t ; 1 *, • . • tict 0-smug Ali6 a'15.,a a c Z iatalOT afa ..‘a sna RAY fCati ‹,,D 4,Ia •1.7.407e.irm,.126.,262.6sif.6.6.2,.frry..41.6 2 1.-2-4-- LAE trAltort-.26 . (2),..c.ica,rivOrTf...14447ic collymn al're OM 4'17.'".4r®,aatratE,morr.Amo, : . .. ' 0..' W2 O*r sagaapraa6tiea kg-macrr p•at.,y_ui t-, 4.12 I fraairwvs orairoC14 L,4lL .(.6„,,1) • p. ..2., .44;,* asoRm4SWCW&K : "IZ,e..1 LANE-ittit PAVEMENT:MAELKING DETAILS 1 . . .., r • 41 - If ,,.,_11 l411.4i.T4Vritr"tr Iraqr* \ 1 t 1 I 70 LiamAIRE\ 4 1.\ , I irie U6126u1..4 1 't p \ titiSt66 WO--Th Caw 1444.7 .. t„,, ,, . . .,.,:k, ., ! ----t,, ,,p1,,, ,, .. , SPUM ktpt5=AR frakt -\\ \ ,up, pigou, atSc46,017 NvAkt.MK; ‘ LNDUR.14,11-0,4a /-rOP M'064•6:RE.r,FCIUNS.01244 to. / 1 Re 1,SCEI.mi. 620 22 S62ES0.12, . ,-r , II,/ SCA,11,SS fir+j i 1 Ce...LIRS, ',...,,..., .t.C•0142R6iE POD-.---, . tit .H, _LA i .7 .. / ,.., i 1 N. -- s• a. ... ... I Is' -.,CI :• ,.. . _,;__._.1 ____4....._ .V., -'-:."-,.,-;.;,,---.' '" ''',,,,,N*.c,„ :.\c,,,,„.. •..4.c. . .• . , ( ! ..r,A1-,i; i aam t.FT ' V*.W.ITS;V,..;;,41Win :Al It . .,„..,,,,.. •...-"A'•.,g'' Z• It . : .'t..:-.1."'.. . :-.;-,....,,,,„ , / / • .0 iokt2E.PQII-VO • gigi DIF '"--,..„.4,1 CO2..6,12-.An _ IL li _ =0 4- ;.1.•74\____rCA:„4,1r21W„ rFIN,C.,.!Y,.X-E,L2V8 .•. rtaNa a Neat,r - ."...7.,<,).../<:;'.° 3 '-.1r$751rWir 2.-.,.tOttliNG SYS:Pk- , ... . ' • iSI2F.6 AS'R2i2V) SOfteleit --1.41... , eat IMIt . ,q)UNI2R11001: I 1 „ ,...,...-:” ;'' ..2''''l sie.4-1 cliathfst t.t.AD. • .._.!__41.S11..'21'1,—..... Citt042 ATZ LOCKLNDLIO DETAIL e:-...,,.-As., . ... .. LIGHTNG'POtE.GROUNDINMANO:RISE'DETAIL ' 4•4 04,,,z,v47 '... , t I . , . ., . i . • , , At'dSliNININAfrx _ .. .. , Date: 4/24/2008 City of Renton -Transportation Page 1 of 2 Time: 1:45 pm PROJECT PAY ESTIMATE Project:NE 4th St./Hoquiam Avenue NE Signalization Estimate No. 6 3/01/2008-4/17/2008 Engineer:James P.Wilhoit Vendor: Transtech Electric Inc PO Number: Project Number:012209 9012 S 208th St Total Authorized: $289,565.00 Revised Total Authorized w/CO: $295,301.06 Contract No:CAG07-134 Contract Working Days: 120 Award Date: 8/06/2007 Kent WA 98031 Notice To Proceed:10/19/2007 Phone: item 1 Description UN 1 Contract 1 Previous This Estimate Total Work Completed Percent No. I Quantity j Unit Price Total Price , Qty Qty ; Amount Qty Amount Complete 01 I on Mobilizati /Demobilization,Site Preparation&Clean-up LS 1.0000 28,000.0000; 28,000.00 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.0000,' 28,000.00 100 02 Contractor Supplied Surveying1-LS 1.0000 7,500.0000 7,500.00 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.0000 7,500.00 100 •03 ,Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion Control LS 1.0000 1,000.0000 1,000.00 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.0000 1,000.00 100 04 'Pothole Utilities EA 6.0000 300.0000 1,800.00 3.0000_ 0.0000• 0.00_ _ 3.0000 900.00' 50 05 Project Temporary Control LS 1.0000 39,000.00001 39,000.00 V / p ry 0_7000 0_3000 11,700.00 1.0000 39,000.00 100 06 Remove Cement Concrete Sidewalk,Including Haul SY 63.0000 21.5000 1,354.50 61.1000 0.0000 0.00 61.1000 1,313.65 97 07- iRemove Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter - LF 95.0000 13.0000 1,235.00 110.0000 0.0000 0.00 110.0000 1,430.00 116 08 j Remove Asphalt Concrete Pavement,Including Haul SY 20.0000 28.0000 560.00 34.0000 0.0000 0.00 34.00001 952.00 170 09 I Removing Traffic Markin EA 9.0000' 80.0000 - .000 10.0000. - _-0 .0 - g g 720.00 0.0000 800.00 10.0000• 800.00 111 10 Removing Raised Pavement Marker EA 450.0000 1.2500 562.50 -- 0.0000� 306.0000' 382_50 306.0000 382.50 68 11 I Remove Plastic Stop Bar ' SF 110.0000 5.0000 550.00 0.0000' 1.02.0000 5.10.00 102.0000 510.00 93 12 Sawcut LF 180.0000' 6.2500; 1,125.00 213.0000 0.0000 0.00 213.0000 1,331.25! 118 13 Crushed Surfacing Top Course ; TON' 7.0000, 125.0000 875.00• 12.7000 0.0000 0.00 12.7000 1,587.50 181 14 HMA Cl.1/2 In.PG 64-22 TON 10.0000 250.0000 2,500.00', 13.6600 0.0000• 0.00 13.6600 3,415.00 137 15 jCement Conc.Traffic Curb and Gutter LF, 95.0000, 27.0000 2,565.00 105.0000 0.0000 0.00 105.0000 2,835.00 111 16 iCement Conc.Sidewalk ! SY, 31.0000 62.0000 1,922.00 13.7000 0.0000 0.00 13.7000 849.40 44 17 1 Cement Conc.Curb Ramp I EA;_ 4.0000'; 1,800.0000 7,200.00, 4.0000 0.0000 0.00 4.0000 7,200.00 100 18 Traffic Signal System ' LS 1.0000', 185,775.0000 185,775.00 0.99000 0.1000 18,577.50 1.0000 185,775.01 100 19 '111'Plastic Stop Bar LF 126.0000 5.0000 630.00 0.0000 117.0000 585.00 117.0000 585.00 93 20 Traffic Arrow EA 8.0000. 85.0000 680.00 0.0000 4. 0000 340.00 4.0000 340.001 50 21 Plastic Crosswalk Stripe __', SF _574.0000' 3.2500 1,865.50 0.0000, 529.0000 1,_719.25 529.0000 1,719.25 92 22 Raised Pavement Marker,Type 1 EA 494.0000 3.2500 1,605.50 0.0000Y 323.0000 1,049.75 323.0000 1,049.75 65 23 4"Raised Pavement Marker T e 2d,Yellow • EA 44.0000 7.5000 330.00 - 0.0000' 36.0000 270.00 36.0000 270.00 82 24 i4"Raised Pavement Marker Type 2e,White . EA 28.0000, 7.5000. 210.00 0.0000 18.0000 135.00 18.0000 135.00 64 Chan a Orders 25 �MinorChange - LS 1.0000 5,736.0600'. 5,736.06 0.0000 1.0000 5,736.06 1.0000 5,736.06 100 Run By: James P.Wilhoit .... Generated by a ShWp•Sof Product Date:4/24/2008 City of Renton -Transportation Page 2 of 2 Time: 1:45 pm PROJECT PAY ESTIMATE Project:NE 4th St./Hoquiam Avenue NE Signalization Estimate No. 6 3/01/2008-4/17/2008 Engineer:James P.Wilhoit Vendor: Transtech Electric Inc PO Number: Project Number:012209 9012 S 208th St Total Authorized: $289,565.00 Contract No:CAG07-134 Revised Total Authorized w/CO: $295,301.06 Contract Working Days: 120 Award Date: 8/06/2007 Kent WA 98031 Notice To Proceed:10/19/2007 Phone: Item Description UN Contract . Previous This Estimate __ _ _Total Work Completed Percent No. ] ; Quantity Unit Price Total Price ! Qty Qty Amount Qty � Amount Complete — ces/':)."-IL.JC.1 /<-9" ✓ ) ,r// / / 5 8 08 Percent of Amt Completed: 102% Amount This Estimate w/CO: $41,805.06 2/+x/14 . // Percent of Days Completed: 102% Total Work Completed to Date: $288,880.31 Engineer Date Contractor Started: 10/22/2007;;CO Amount This Estimate: $5,736.06 Working Days Started: 10/22/2007'CIO Total to Date: $5,736.06 Materials On Hand: $0.00 Construction Engineer Date Original Completion: 4/15/2008 Materials On Hand Deduction: $0.00 Non-Working Days: 2;Overall Total Completed: $294,616.37 Time Extension Days: 0 Deduct 5.00•/. Retention $(14,730.82) C.nstructlon Manager Date Estimated Completion: _ 5_ 4/17/2008!I Retention Withheld this Estimate $(2,090.25) �-7—Q Actual Completion: 4/17/2008 Retention Withheld to Date: $(14,730.82)I Retention Released to Date: $0.00 ontra tor's Representative Date 'Other Deductions: $0.00 ✓� /u ,� ( �,�7 ,&z...4--- --- — 'Total Deductions: $(14,730.82) (� �iTotal Due to Date: $279,885.55 Deduct Previous Payments: $(240,170.74)' Balance Due This Estimate: $39,714.81 Run By: James P.Wilhoit c.n.raewny.snarp.seaProduct S.''4,sur o� State of Washington Reg.No.: 04 Department of Revenue Audit Procedures&Administration Date: September 12,2008 PO Box 47474 °. 4'L 1889�O Olympia,Washington 98504-7474 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY City of Renton Assigned To 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 Date Assigned Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract CAG S. 07-134 NE 4th Street And Hoquiam Avenue NE Signal Improvement Project Contractor's Name TransTech Electric Inc. Telephone No. (253) 872-5343 Contractor's Address 9012 S 208th St., Kent, WA 98032 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted %NW October 22, 2007 April 17, 2008 April 17, 2008 Surety or Bonding Co. American Contractors Indemnity Company of California Agent's Address Hentschell&Associates,Inc. One Pacific Building 621 Pacific Avenue Suite 400 Tacoma WA 98402 Contract Amount: $ 289,295.00 Amount Disbursed: $ 279,885.55 Additions or Reductions: $ 5,321.37 Amount Retained: $ 14,730.82 Sales Tax: $ Total: $ 294,616.37 Total $ 294,616.37 By (Disbursing Officer) Phone No: The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, Olympia, Washington 98504- 7474,immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate,and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 31 0020(12-92) H.\Division s\TRANSPOR TAT\DESIGN ENG\Iwdhoit\4th&hgm\construction\4thhgmCOMPFORM DOC CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: s► f i Submitting Data: Public Works Department For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division October 6, 2008 Staff Contact Jim Seitz, Transportation Planning Agenda Status and Programming Supervisor (extension 7245) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Washington State Department of Transportation Ordinance X (WSDOT)Access Permitting Standards for Managed Resolution - Access Highways Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Ordinance Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council Concur Finance Dept Fiscal Impact (None) Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment N/A Amount Budgeted.. N/A Revenue Generated N/A Amount Needed N/A City Share Total Project. N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: Established in 1991, current state law requires cities and towns to be the permitting authorities for state managed access highways within their boundaries. The law applies to state managed access highways within the City of Renton. The current law requires cities and towns to adopt access permitting standards for these highways that meet or exceed the state's access standards. The law does not pertain to existing driveways, only new driveway access on certain state highways as shown in Attachment A within the City of Renton. Officially adopting the WSDOT access standards will bring the City of Renton into compliance with state law and will avoid jeopardizing receipt of state funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the adoption of the WSDOT access permitting standards for managed access highways within the City of Renton and present the ordinance amending Renton City Code 4-4-080I,Driveway Design Standards, and 4-6-060F,Public Street and Sidewalk Design Standards, for reading. lose H:\File Sys\TRP-Transportation Planning&Programming\HighwayAcccssOrdAgendaReportl.doc "S-fl O 6 ® , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • -c.r/Nrc4', MEMORANDUM DATE: October 6, 2008 TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor (X- FROM: Gregg ZimmermVi, ublic Works Administrator SUBJECT: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Access Permitting Standards for Managed Access Highways ISSUE: Should the City of Renton adopt the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) access permitting standards for managed access highways? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the adoption of the WSDOT access permitting standards for managed access highways within the City of Renton and present the ordinance amending Renton City Code 4-4-0801, Driveway Design Standards, and 4-6-060F,Public Street and Sidewalk Design Standards, for reading. BACKGROUND: Established in 1991, current state law requires cities and towns to be the permitting authorities for state managed access highways within their boundaries. The law applies to state managed access highways within the City of Renton. The current law requires cities and towns to adopt access permitting standards for these highways that meet or exceed the state's access standards. The law does not pertain to existing driveways, only new driveway access on certain State highways as shown in Attachment A within the City of Renton. In its 2007 session, the Washington State Legislature tasked WSDOT with inventorying how cities have implemented current laws for managing access on state highways within their boundaries. As a result, 205 cities around the state are being asked to confirm by December 1, 2008, that their city has adopted the required access permitting standards for the managed access state highways within its boundaries. As shown in Attachment A, the City of Renton's state highways that the law applies to are: Nosy Marcie Palmer,Council President Members of the Renton City Council October 13,2008 Page 2 of 2 Now • SR 167 (Rainer Avenue from Grady Way to South 2nd Street) • SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway from I-405 to the east City limits) • SR 515 (Benson Drive/Talbot Road/Grady Way/Main Avenue South from South 2nd Street to SE 192nd Street) • SR 900 (Sunset Boulevard/South 2nd and South 3rd/Mill Avenue South/Bronson Way from east City limits to west City limits) Note: 1-405, SR 167 south of Grady Way, and SR 900 (NE Park Drive) are state limited access highways, so the law does not apply on these routes. All of Renton's routes fall within classification three or four which balances the needs of mobility and access to determine driveway location for new developments. Attachment B summarizes all five managed access highway classifications and the driveway spacing for each. It explains the benefits of access control and how the standards were developed. It also contains the language from the legislative access proviso, ESHB 1094, Sec 222 (4), which ties the requirement of adopting the standards to the receipt of state funding. Attachment C (Chapter 468-51 &468-52 WAC)provides further detail into the administrative process, access control classifications system and standards pursuant to RCW 47.50. The City's current practice is to consult with WSDOT staff during design review when access to one of the state highways shown in Attachment A is affected. The City's Development Services staff and Transportation staff report that they do not see any adverse impact to the City's current development procedures or to the development community by officially adopting WSDOT's access standards. This `housekeeping' measure is simply making our current practice in handling access to state managed highways our adopted standard. Upon adoption of the WSDOT access permitting standards for managed access highway, the Public Works Administrator will complete the WSDOT City/Town Access Standards Status Form (Attachment D) and return it to WSDOT by December 1, 2008,thereby complying with the Washington State Legislative's access proviso ESHB 1094, Sec 222 (4). Also, upon adoption of the standards, the City's Development Services staff will amend the standard design and procedural documents as needed that are used internally and/or for use by the private development community. Attachments: A—State Managed Access Highways in the City of Renton B—Managed Access in Washington—A Progress Report to the Legislature C—Chapters 468-51 WAC Access Permits and 468-52 WAC Access Control Classifications D—City/Town Access Standards Status Form cc: Alex Pietsch,Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator Peter Hahn,Deputy PW Administrator—Transportation Neil Watts,Development Services Director Bob Hanson,Transportation Design Supervisor Jim Seitz,Transportation Planning and Programming Supervisor Nog Connie Brundage,Transportation Administrative Secretary File H:\File Sys\TRP-Transportation Planning&Programming\HighwayAccessOrdlssuePaper.doc Attachment A State Managed Access Highways in the City of Renton �w�4K jios ern`. t'.,-s7...,,--.... r -- ss(� ... r ' 1 EI DGE ti .' k fl BRYN MAVVP. ', KJ ti„T -)J- - f' _-- -" A"-, w '''�-! - v, - .{..µ `tt ° •• , . . E ., , { i t { ' $ •^qtr+_,-'rN E . rx 3 i 40, , �u A t . a '1,7,,IV . 0.-0---vx 1-4-_,t, 900 ,.'"--` *,;:itilr-7-. -- : -s--44e-O'f'-', (-:: , ... . s + tgi } JI''' 's,# �1 e , is: ��r °.x;d ap gg� Fk I!---..z.,,„ . ' .s^'r.~.y-J.•`',... .f 'P a v k+ M1'4 44. li .., 5 �,, .rY. _ "Ys-SE- _ t._ --' r ' � .. fes{ tf1a • 'I 2/! ,� Ct0/ . Ltd1$Ottt.St- _� t 4++ i ' 3' j .-" ..,... _ .. "_ ' .i 5�=.1921 1 [ ,-, i rr - __ - �u. N---...-I.Li-711.....___:_..............:.. .-:._.:...::..::::-.:.1................. ........ SR 167(Rainier Ave) M4 mismomm SR 169 (Maple Valley Hwy) M4 Note r► rimosinsitsi SR 515 (Benson Dr/Talbot Rd/ I-405, SR 167 south of Grady Way, Grady Way/Main Ave S) M3 and SR 900 from I-405 to Edmonds Niffigfiggsra SR 900 (Sunset Blvd) M3 Ave NE(NE Park Drive)are State Illaillmaill SR 900(Sunset Blvd/ S 2nd—S 3rd/ Limited Access Highways Mill Ave S/Bronson Way) M4 August 2008 AM. Attachment B Washington State WI Department of Transportation Managed Access in Washington - • A Progress Report to the Legislature 4.. '; F September,2007 ' n its 2007 transportation budget,the legislature tasked the Washington I State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) with reporting the progress Managed Access Highway Classifications of local jurisdictions toward fulfilling their responsibilities under the highway access management statutes enacted in 1991. WSDOT is working with a Class One: number of stakeholders to complete this task, including the Community, • Mobility is primary function Trade and Economic Development Department(CTED), the Association of • Speeds of 50 to 65 mph Washington Cities (AWC), and the Washington State Association of Counties • 1,320 ft.minimum access spacing (WSAC). Our intent is to help local governments successfully demonstrate to j • No direct access if alternate public the legislature their commitment to protecting the safety and capacity of the i road is available state highway system through good access management. • Restrictive median for some multi- lane configurations Access Control on State Highways Class Two: • Mobility favored over access Access control manages traffic movements onto and off of state highways to improve • Speed of 35 to 50 mph in urban ar- system performance,minimize traffic conflicts,and increase traffic flow. Typical access eas and 45 to 55 mph in rural.areas 71 management techniques include minimum spacing between intersections and driveways, • 660 ft.minimum access spacing dedicated turn lanes,and median treatments. Access control preserves a highway's safety • No direct access if alternative public ' and capacity, reducing accidents by as much as 50 percent and increasing road capacity by road is available as much as 45 percent.' • Restrictive median for some multi- In Washington, state highways are classified as either limited or managed access. The basic lane configurations policy for limited access highways was established in 1951 and is based on the purchase of Class access rights from the owners of property abutting the highway.'- There are three levels of • Balance between mobility and access limited access control with progressive restrictions. Approaches to all limited access routes, in areas with less than maximum except interstates, must be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation build out (WSDOT). Interstate approaches are approved by the Federal Highway Administration. • Speeds of 30 to 40 mph in urban•ar- eas and 45 to 55 mph in rural areas Managed access legislation was enacted in 1991 to address the portion of the state • 330 ft.minimum access spacing transportation system that was not established as limited access.' Managed access is based • Restrictive median may be warranted on the premise that the access rights of a property owner are subordinate to the public's Class Four: right and interest in a safe and efficient highway system. A property owner's direct access • Balance between mobility and access to a state highway may be restricted if reasonable access can be provided to another public in areas with near maximum build: road.4 out WSDOT consulted and cooperated with local and regional governments to implement • Speeds of 30 to 35 mph in urban managed access legislation. WSDOT developed access design standards,adopted areas and 35 to 45 in rural areas permitting procedures,established a five-tier classification system,and assigned specific • 250 ft.minimum access spacing highway segments to those classifications. The City Design Standards Committee, • Non-restrictive medians consisting of the state aid engineer and six AWC appointees,participated in crafting the new Class Five: access management code and formally concurred with it in 1992. Additionally,about half • Access needs generally have priority of cities and towns officially concurred with the access classifications WSDOT assigned to over mobility needs the managed access highways within their boundaries. • Speeds of 25 to 35 mph • 125 ft.minimum access spacing 1.Access Regulation-A Balancing Act Between Access and Mobility.WSDOT.2005. • Non-restrictive medians 2.RCW 47.52 WAC 468-52-040 3.RCW 47.50.010(2) 4.RCW 47.50.010(3) State law splits the responsibility for state managed access highway permitting based on the location of the state highway. In unincorporated areas,access permitting is The Legislative Access Proviso: the responsibility of the WSDOT region offices. Cities and towns are the permitting "By December 1,2008,the department uthorities for the state managed access highways within their boundaries.5 Cities and shaft require confirmation from jurisdictions �,,..c�wns are required by statute to adopt access permitting standards for the state managed actthat plan under the growth management access highways within their boundaries that meet or exceed WSDOT standards.` rec,eivch star transpPrtatRCWiriand tdin g The initial deadline for adoption was July 1, 1993. If cities fail to adopt the required under thisact, ha the ejjurisdictions have standards,WSDOT standards may be used as a default.' adopted standards for access permitting on state highways that meet or exceed department standards in accordance The Legislative Request with RCW 47.50.030.The objective of this suection is tolocal The legislature's 2007 transportation budget included a proviso directing WSDOT to govemments,through the recgeipt of state require local jurisdictions to confirm they have adopted access permitting standards for transportation funding,to adhere to best state managed access highways. The standards must meet or exceed WSDOT standards, practices in access control applicable to as required by statute. The proviso also directed WSDOT to submit a report to the development activity significantly impacting legislature detailing local jurisdictions' progress toward adopting the standards. stat0 transportation9efacilities.aBy nuary 1,2009,the department shall submit a report to e ropriate committees of the A work group of stakeholders met in July and advised WSDOT to seek confirmation from leg s aturedetailing the progress of the local all 205 cities that contain managed access highways. WSDOT will contact the public jurisdictions in adopting the highway access works directors of these cities by mail,provide them with a description of the managed permitting standards." access highways within their boundaries,and request them to submit: ESHB 1094,Sec 222(4) • either a statement confirming their adoption of the required access permitting standards or a description of their progress toward adopting the standards, For More Information • a statement concurring with the managed access classifications assigned to the highways within their boundaries,if applicable, and For more information about the access • a copy of their access permitting standards ordinance. proviso,please contact '44 10F[e 76 cities that do not contain managed access highways will not he contacted. Karena Houser WSDOT Transportation Planner In the interest of providing the best possible information to the legislature about the status (360)70@Ws876t wa,gov of access management in Washington,the work group also decided to survey counties www.walot.wa,gov/planning with managed access highways within their unincorporated areas. Although WSDOT is 'wsdot.wa.gv/planniltg the permitting authority for these highways, the county development permitting office Ashley Probart is often a point of first contact for developers who may require a state access permit. AWC Transportation Coordinator The survey's intent is to help us understand how counties coordinate with the state on AshleyP@awcnet.org development permitting for properties adjacent to state managed access highways. The (360)753-4137 electronic survey will be distributed to county engineers by e-mail,except in San Juan www.awcnet.org County which does not contain any managed access highways. Julie Murray WSDOT is requesting city and county responses by November 30,2007. This allows WSAC Policy Director ample time for cities that have not yet adopted appropriate access permitting standards to (360)586-4219 Direc4 torJrnurray@wacounties.org rg do so prior to the December,2008 final deadline. This will also allow WSDOT,CTED, 19 ext www.wacounties.org/wsac AWC time to provide additional technical assistance to cities and towns that have not yet adopted the required standards. For more information about access con- WSDOT will summarize the information provided by the cities and counties in a tiol on state highways,please contact: preliminary report to the 2008 Legislature and a final report to the 2009 Legislature. Barb De Ste.Croix,P.E. WSDOT Access&Hearings Engineer Destecl3@wsdot.wa.gov (360)705-7251 www.wsdot.wa.gov/eesc/tiesign/access MprW 47.50.020(3) 6.RCW 47.50.030(3) 7.WAC 468-51-010 . Attachment C • Contents: Chapter 468-51 WAC Access Permits—Administrative Process 1 Chapter 468-52 WAC Access Control Classification System and Standards �U Chapter 468-51 WAC passing a point or segment of a highway,in both directions,dur- Highway Access Management Access Permits— ing a period of time,divided by the number of days in the period Administrative Process and factored to represent an estimate of traffic volume for an average day of the year. Last Update: 2/25/99 (3)"Average weekday vehicle trip ends(AWDVTE)"means the estimated total of all trips entering plus all trips leaving the Sections applicant's site based on the final stage of proposed development. 468-51-010 Purpose. (4)"Conforming connection"means a connection that meets 468-51-020 Definitions. current department location,spacing,and design criteria. 468-51-030 General provisions. (5)"Connection"means approaches,driveways,turnouts,or 468-51-040 Connection categories. other means of providing for the right of access to or from con- 468-51-050 Conceptual review. trolled access facilities on the state highway system. 468-51-060 Application requirements and procedures. (6)"Connection category"means a permit category of all state 468-51-070 Fees and surety bond. highway connections,in accordance with the type of property 468-51-080 Application submittal,review,conditions. served and the estimated traffic generated by the applicant's site 468-51-090 Construction requirements. based on rates accepted by the department. 468-51-100 Nonconforming connection permits. (7)"Connection permit"means a written authorization given 468-51-105 Variance connection permits. by the department for a specifically designed connection to the 468-51-110 Changes in property site use. state highway system at a specific location for a specific type and 468-51-120 Permit modification,revocation,closure of permitted intensity of property use and specific volume of traffic for the connections. __.proposed connection,based on the final stage of proposed devel- 468-51-130 Closure of unpermitted connections. opment of the applicant's property.The actual form used for this 468-51-140 Department construction projects. authorization will be determined by the department. 468-51-150 Adjudicative proceedings. (8)"Controlled access facility"means a transportation facility (excluding limited access facilities as defined in chapter 47.52 468-51-010 Purpose. This chapter is adopted for use by the RCW)to which access is regulated by the governmental entity Washington state department of transportation to implement having jurisdiction over the facility.Owners or occupants of abut- chapter 47.50 RCW for the regulation and control of vehicular ting lands and other persons have a right of reasonable access to access and connection points of ingress to,and egress from,the and from such facility at such points only and in such manner as state highway system within unincorporated areas that are under may be determined by the governmental entity. the jurisdiction of the Washington state department of transpor- (9)"Department"means the Washington state department of tation.However,this chapter and chapter 468-52 WAC may be transportation. used,as a default,by cities that are the permitting authorities if _ (10)"Development approval"means an official action by they have not adopted an enacting ordinance as required under a governmental land use planning authority authorizing the chapter 47.50 RCW. developer or land owner to begin construction of any permanent This chapter describes the connection permit application improvements on the property. process and procedures,including a preapplication conceptual (11)"Governmental entity"means,for the purpose of this review process,and requirements for closure of unpermitted and chapter,a unit of local government or officially designated nonconforming connections to the state highway system. transportation authority that has the responsibility for planning, construction,operation,maintenance,or jurisdiction over trans- [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ portation facilities. 468-51-010,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW (12)"Joint use connection"means a single connection point 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-010,filed that serves as a connection to more than one property or develop- 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] ment,including those in different ownerships or in which access rights are provided in the legal descriptions. 468-51-020 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter,the (13)"Limited access facility"means a highway or street following definitions of terms shall apply unless the context especially designed or designated for through traffic,and over, clearly indicates otherwise: from,or to which owners or occupants of abutting land,or other (1)"Application"means an application form supplied by the persons have no right or easement,or only a limited right or ease- department and completed by the applicant,a certified check or ment of access,light,view or air by reason of the fact that their money order for the required application fee,and related property property abuts upon such limited access facility,or for any other site,driveway,roadway,and traffic information, reason to accomplish the purpose of a limited access facility. (2)"Average daily traffic(ADT)"means the volume of traffic (14)"Median"means the portion of a divided highway or di- 1 vided connection separating vehicular traffic traveling in opposite 468-51-030 General provisions. directions;not including speed change lanes,storage lanes for left (1)When connection permits required.Every owner of property turning or U-turning vehicles,or two way left turn lanes. which abuts a state highway,or has a legal easement to the state (15)"Median opening"means either a full opening in a con- highway,where limited access rights have not been acquired uous median for the specific purpose of allowing vehicles to has a right to reasonable access,but may not have the right to a *eke a left turn maneuver into or out of a property abutting the particular means of access,to the state highway system.The right highway,to facilitate U-turns,or to allow for a vehicle to totally of access to the state highway may be restricted if,in compliance cross the road,or a directional opening allowing for left turn ma- with local regulation,reasonable access to the state highway can neuvers into the property and U-turn maneuvers,but not allowing be provided by way of another public road which abuts the prop- for left turns or cross movements out of the property. erty.These public roads shall be of sufficient width and strength (16)"Nonconforming connection"means a connection not to reasonably handle the traffic type and volumes that would be meeting current department location,spacing,or design criteria. accessing that road.All new connections including alterations (17)"Permit"means written approval issued by the depart- and improvements to existing connections to state highways shall ment,subject to conditions stated therein,authorizing construc- require a connection permit. Such permits,if allowed,shall be tion,reconstruction,maintenance, or reclassification of a state issued only after written development approval where such ap- highway connection and associated traffic control devices on or proval is required,unless other interagency coordination proce- to the department's right of way. dures are in effect.However,the department can provide a letter (18)"Permitting authority"means the department or any of intent to issue a connection permit if that is a requirement of county,municipality,or transportation authority authorized to the agency that is responsible for development approval.The regulate access to their respective transportation systems. alteration or closure of any existing access connection caused by (19)"Reasonable access"means an access connection that is changes to the character,intensity of development,or use of the suitable for the existing and/or proposed property use and does property served by the connection or the construction of any new not adversely affect the safety,operations or maintenance of the access connection shall not begin before a connection permit is highway system. obtained from the department.Use of a new connection at the (20)"Right of way(R/W)"means a general term denoting location specified in the permit is not authorized until the permit land or interest therein,acquired for or designated for transporta- holder constructs or modifies the connection in accordance with tion purposes.More specifically,land in which the department, the permit requirements.If a property owner or permit holder a county,or a municipality owns the fee simple title,has an who has a valid connection permit wishes to change the charac- easement devoted to or required for use as a public road and ap- ter,use,or intensity of the property or development served by *"lrtenant facilities,or has established ownership by prescriptive the connection,the department must be contacted to determine t,or lands that have been dedicated for public transportation whether a new connection permit would be required. tposes. (2)Responsibility for other approvals.Connection permits (21)"Shoulder"means the portion of the highway contigu- authorize construction improvements to be built by the permit ous with the traveled lanes for the accommodation of stopped holder on department right of way.It is the responsibility of the vehicles for emergency use,and for lateral support of base and applicant or permit holder to obtain any other local permits or surface courses and for other uses as allowed by law. other agency approvals that may be required,including satisfac- (22)"State highway system"means all roads,streets,and tion of all environmental regulations.It is also the responsibility highways designated as state routes in compliance with chapter of the applicant to acquire any property rights necessary to pro- 47.17 RCW. vide continuity from the applicant's property to the state highway (23)"Temporary connection"means a permitted connection right of way if the applicant's property does not abut the right of for a specific property use,conditioned to be open for a specific way,except where the connection replaces an existing access as a purpose and traffic volume for a specific period of time with the result of department relocation activity. right of way to be restored by the permit holder to its original (3)Early consultation.In order to expedite the overall permit condition upon connection closure. review process,the applicant is strongly encouraged to consult (24)"Variance permit"means a special nonconforming or with the department prior to and during the local government additional connection permit,issued for a location not normally subdivision,rezoning,site plan,or any other applicable prede- permitted by current department standards,after an engineering velopment review process for which a connection permit will be study demonstrates,to the satisfaction of the department,that the required.The purpose of the consultation shall be to determine connection will not adversely affect the safety,maintenance or the permit category and to obtain a conceptual review of the de- operation of the state highway in accordance with its assigned velopment site plan and proposed access connections to the state classification.This permit will remain valid until modified or highway system with respect to department connection location, revoked by the permitting authority. quantity,spacing,and design standards. Such consultation will assist the developer in minimizing problems and delays during [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ the permit application process and could eliminate the need for 468-51-020,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW costly changes to site plans when unpermittable connection pro- /.-^1.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-020,filed posals are identified early in the planning phase.The conceptual x,92,effective 7/25/92.] review process is further detailed in WAC 468-51-050. (4)Cost of construction. (a)Permit holder.The cost of construction or modification of a 2 r. --LL a -45 — -a ✓ connection shall be the responsibility of the permit holder,includ- and temporary emergency access.The department reserves the ing the cost of modification of any connection required as a result right to remove any temporary connection at its sole discretion of changes in property site use in accordance with WAC 468-51- and at the expense of the property owner after the expiration of 110.However,the permit holder is not responsible for alterations the permit.Further,a temporary connection permit does not bind made at the request of the department that are not required by law the department,in any way,to the future issuance of a permanv or administrative rule. connection permit at the temporary connection location. Niiiii (b)Department. Existing permitted connections impacted (5)"Nonconforming connection"designation may be issued by the department's work program and which,in the consider- for Category I through IV permits after an analysis and determi- ation of the department,necessitate modification,relocation,or nation by the department that a conforming connection cannot be replacement in order to meet current department connection loca- made and a finding that the denial of a connection would leave tion,quantity,spacing,and design standards,shall be modified, the property without a reasonable means of access to the pub- relocated,or replaced in kind by the department at no cost to the lic road system.In such instances,the permit shall be noted as permit holder.The cost of further enhancements or modification nonconforming and contain specific restrictions and provisions, to the altered,relocated,or replaced connections requested by the including limits on the maximum vehicular use of the connection, permit holder shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. the future availability of alternate means of reasonable access for (5)Notification.The department shall notify affected property which a conforming connection permit could be obtained,the re- owners,permit holders,business owners and/or emergency ser- moval of the nonconforming connection at the time the conform- vices,in writing,where appropriate,whenever the department's ing access is available,and other conditions as necessary to carry work program requires the modification,relocation,or replace- out the provisions of chapter 47.50 RCW. ment of their access connections.In addition to written notifica- (6)"Variance connection"means a special nonconforming or tion,the department shall facilitate,where appropriate,a public additional connection permit,issued for a location not normally process which may include,but is not limited to,public notices, permitted by current department standards,after an engineering meetings or hearings,and/or individual meetings.The depart- study demonstrates that the connection will not adversely affect ment shall provide the interested parties with the standards and the safety,maintenance or operation of the highway in accor- principles of access management. dance with its assigned classification.This permit will remain (6)Department responsibility.The department has the respon- valid until modified or revoked by the permitting authority. sibility to issue permits and authority to approve,disapprove,and (7)"Median opening"includes openings requested for both revoke such permits,and to close connections,with cause. new connections and for existing connections.New median openings proposed as part of a new driveway connection shall [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ be reviewed as part of the permit application review process. 468-51-030,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW Request for the construction of new median openings to serve ,460, 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-030,filed existing permitted connections shall require a reevaluation of the 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] location,quantity,design of existing connection,and traffic at the existing connections.The property owner must file a new con- 468-51-040 Connection categories. All connections,public or nection permit application,for the proper connection category, private shall be determined by the department to be in one of the showing the new proposed median opening location and design following categories: and its relationship to the existing or modified driveway connec- (1)"Category I-minimum connection"provides connection tions.Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit to the state highway system for up to ten single family residences, the department from closing an existing median opening where a duplex,or a small multifamily complex of up to ten dwelling operational or safety reasons require the action.The department units,which use a common connection.The category shall also shall notify affected property owners,permit holders and tenants, apply to permanent connections to agricultural and forest lands, in writing,thirty days in advance of the closure of a median open- including field entrances;connections for the operation,mainte- ing unless immediate closure is needed for safety or operational nance,and repair of utilities;and connections serving other low reasons. volume traffic generators expected to have an average weekday vehicle trip ends(AWDVTE)of one hundred or less. [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ (2)"Category II-minor connection"provides connection to 468-51-040,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW the state highway system for medium volume traffic generators 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-040,filed expected to have an AWDVTE of one thousand five hundred or 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] less,but not included in Category I. . (3)"Category III-major connection"provides connection 468-51-050 Conceptual review. Prior to filing a connection to the state highway system for high volume traffic generators permit application and prior to receipt of development approval, expected to have an AWDVTE exceeding one thousand five all permit applicants,but in particular those applying for Cat- hundred. egory II and Category III connections,are strongly encouraged (4)"Category IV-temporary connection"provides a tempo- to request,in writing,a conceptual review of the site plan and rary,time limited,connection to the state highway system for a proposed connection locations with the department and other specific property for a specific use with a specific traffic volume. local governmental agencies as appropriate.The purpose of the Such uses include,but are not limited to,logging,forest land conceptual review is to expedite the overall review process by clearing,temporary agricultural uses,temporary construction, establishing the permit category,number,type,and general loca- 3 - W DLV 1 OtsllltlaFUS lUI-HCCVSS ref-mating un estate n'laII4geu EiCCCJJ illgil!vay, tion of connections to the property early in the planning stages plicant.The current complete names,mailing addresses,and of a proposed development or a proposed significant change in telephone numbers of the property owner(s),the developer(s),the property site use,or to determine that the connection as requested applicant,the transportation and legal consultants representing cannot be permitted.The conceptual review does not constitute the applicant(if any),and the local government representative(s) Ial department approval of the location and design of the con- responsible for processing the development's approval shall be Nitiottction.If deemed appropriate,especially on the more complex provided as part of the application. If the property owner desires proposals,the department shall establish the date for a conceptual to have a representative sign the application,a notarized letter of review meeting to be held within two weeks of the receipt of the authorization from the applicant is to be provided with the ap- written request unless a later date is requested by the applicant.If plication.When the owner or applicant is a company,corporation, a meeting is scheduled,representatives of the local governmen- or other public agency,the name,address,and telephone number tal land use planning authority will be invited to attend.Within of the responsible officer shall be furnished.The names of all four weeks following the conceptual review meeting,or receipt individuals signing the application and their titles shall be typed of the request if no meeting is scheduled,the department will or printed directly below the signature. provide the applicant written notice of the department's concep- (b)Property uses and traffic information.The ultimate planned tual review findings,provided all needed information to complete property uses shall be indicated in sufficient detail to determine the review has been received from the applicant.These findings the appropriate permit classification. Estimated average weekday are nonbinding on the department and the developer.Additional vehicle trip ends to be generated by the development,based on detailed information received during the application process, the planned property use,consistent with the latest trip generation changes in the proposed development,or changes in the existing information published by the Institute of Transportation Engi- or planned operational characteristics of the state highway system neers,Washington,D.C.,(ITE)shall be included as appropriate. may necessitate modifications of the connections agreed to in the If local or special trip generation rates are used,instead of the conceptual approval.The conceptual review findings can be used ITE rates the latest and best information shall be used and all by the developer in the site plan review/approval process with the documentation for the rate development shall be submitted with local government having jurisdiction over the development as in- the application.For residential developments with ten or fewer dicating coordination of connection location,quantity,and design units,ten trips per day per unit may be assumed.The requirement with the department and of preliminary department findings on for an average weekday vehicle trip ends estimate may be waived the proposed connections. for agricultural uses where no retail marketing is proposed. [Statutory Authority:RCW 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14- (c)Site plan.The application shall include a plan to scale,or a schematic drawing showing critical dimensions(allowable on "4,§468-51-050,filed 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92] Category I permits only),the location of the property, �, p p rty,and exist- ing�68-51-060 Application requirements andprocedures. This conditions and the character and extent of work proposed. The location of existing and proposed on-site development with rule shall be used where the department is the permitting au- respect to the existing and proposed driveway location(s)and the thority.Where the local governmental entity is the permitting highway shall be shown.Minimum information on the plan shall authority,the applicable procedures of the local governmental include: entity must be followed. If the local governmental entity has nor procedures then this rule may ()Road information. ❑State route number. (1)Connection permit application and information.The appro- o County or local road name. priate application form and the application information are avail- o Highway pavement type. able from the designated local department offices.An application o Cross section. shall consist of the above form;application fee,as specified in o Posted speed limit. WAC 468-51-070;plans;traffic data;and connection information o The existence and location of any existing and/or future pro- specified in this section. posed public or private road abutting or entering the property;the All connection and roadway design documents for Category II horizontal and vertical curvature of the road(s)noting the location and III permits shall bear the seal and signature of a professional of existing and proposed connections and any other pertinent engineer,registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW. information. (2)Information required-all permits.The following informa- ii Pro tion is required of all applicants for all permit categories,unless ( )Property information. the department determines that specific information will not be °Location of all existing and proposed buildings,and other structures,such as gasoline pumps,lights,trees,etc.,with respect required on individual applications.Additional information re- to the existingand proposed property quired of Category II,III,and IV permit applications is specified P p P P rh'and right of way lines. P o Any adjacent properties that are owned or controlled by the in this chapter.In all cases it would be prudent,prior to submittal applicant,or in which the applicant has a financial interest,and of the application,for the applicant to inquire of the department indicate whether these properties will be accessed by means of whether the application needs additional information.The depart- the proposed connection(s). ment reserves the right to request clarification or additional infor- o Proof of legal ownership or legal easement. 'on during the application review process.Failure to provide o The application shall include a boundary survey.The re- fequested information within the time limits specified in the quirement for a boundary survey may be waived for Category I request shall result in withdrawal of the permit application. connections,at the discretion of the department. (a)Identification and signature of property owner and ap- o Any existing or proposed parcels segregated from the ap- 4 1111► - - o plicant's property for separate development also shall be clearly control devices and lighting locations. designated on the plan. (d)Sight distance.Analysis of horizontal and vertical sight (iii)Connection location information. distance on the state highway with respect to the proposed con- o The proposed connection milepost and highway engineer's nection. station,if available. (e)Traffic data and analysis.Traffic data submitted by the o Location of the highway centerline with respect to existing applicant shall be signed and sealed by a qualified professional and proposed property lines. engineer,registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW.The a Distance of proposed public or private access connection to following traffic study information may be required: intersecting roads,streets,railroads. (i)Turning movements.Vehicle turning movements for pres- o Existing or proposed median openings(crossovers)and ent and future traffic conditions. connections on all sides of the state highway and other roads (ii)Volume and type.Amount and type of traffic that will be within six hundred sixty feet of the proposed connection loca- generated by the proposed development including a breakdown tion in urban areas and one thousand three hundred twenty feet in of the level oot serviceated k hour on thtraffic atate hidan hway.analysis of the impact on nonurban(rural)areas. o Location of existing or proposed public or private retaining (iii)Parking and circulation.Analysis of off-street parking and walls,fences,poles,sidewalks,bike paths,drainage structures traffic circulation,including distances to secondary access points and easements,traffic control devices,fire hydrants,utilities,or on the connection roadway and their impact on the operation of other physical features,such as trees,landscaping,green belts, the state highway. and wetlands,that could affect driveway location. (iv)Traffic signal data.If a traffic signal is requested,the fol- a It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to physically lowing studies may be required:Traffic signal warrants;phasing identify the location of the proposed connection at the proposed and timing analysis;signal progression analysis;signalization, site. signing,and lighting plans in compliance with department stan- (iv)Connection design information. dards.A separate department traffic signal permit is required. o Proposed connection and approach improvements including (v)Off-site improvements.A traffic analysis to determine the its profile approaching the state highway,width,radii,angle to need for off-site related roadway and geometric improvements the highway,auxiliary pavement. and mitigation requirements. o Existing and proposed grading(or contouring that affects (vi)Traffic control plan.A traffic control plan conforming to the natural drainage pattern or runoff impacting the state highway current department standards set forth in the"Manual on Uniform and the proposed connection). Traffic Control Devices,"documenting how the permit holder o Drainage calculations and other pertinent data. will provide for safe and efficient movement on the state highway o Driveway,auxiliary lanes and crossover pavement design, system during the construction of the connection. including subgrade,base,surface materials,and thicknesses. (4)Additional information required,Category IV permits.Per411111.1- o Specific requirements for design information on individual mit applications must contain the specific dates that the connec- Category I permit applications may be relaxed,or waived,at the tion is to be open and must contain assurances acceptable to the discretion of the department. department that the shoulder,curbing,sidewalks,bikeways,ditch, (v)Joint driveway use. right of way,and any other amenities will be restored to their o If the driveway is to serve more than one property,the plan original condition at the permit holder's expense upon closure of shall detail information for all properties using the connection the temporary connection. and the application shall include copies of legally enforceable [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ agreements of concurrence for all property owners on joint drive- 468-51-060,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW way usage. 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-060,filed o Joint driveway use serving adjoining properties is encour- 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] aged on all highways and may be required on some highways,in compliance with rules adopted by the department. Fees and bond. (3)Additional information required,Category II and Category 468-51-070(1Fee struFees The surety bo nonrefundable fee structure III permits.The following is a list of additional information that may be required for each phase of the development from the is established for department application processing,review, and inspection.Full payment of base fees must accompany the applicant.Prior to the submittal of the application,the applicant permit application.Due to the potential complexity of Category shall coordinate with the appropriate designated local office of II and Category III connection proposals,and required mitigation the department on the level of detail and the analysis techniques measures that may involve construction on the state highway,the to be used. department may require a developer agreement in addition to the (a)Circulation plans.All parking,interior drives,and internal connection permit.The developer agreement may include,but is traffic Connection plans. not limited to:Plans;specifications;maintenance requirements; (b) users.All internal and external adjacent bonding requirements;inspection requirements;division of costs parcels which will use the requested connection.All existing and proposed connecting roadways and potential means of alternate by the parties,where applicable;and provisions for payment by the applicant of actual costs incurred by the department in the access through the final buildout stage of development shall be shown on the plans submitted with the application. review and administration of the applicant's proposal that exceed the required base fees in the following schedule: (c)Traffic control devices and illumination.Proposed traffic 5 — —i, - ---a--..—✓ through the voluntary conceptual review process,the written no- (a)Category I base fees for one connection. tice of concurrence will indicate whether or not there have been (i)Field(agricultural),forest lands,utility any changes in the number,location,or design of the connection operation and maintenance $50 required by the department.No construction may commence on (ii)Residential dwelling units(up to 10) the department's right of way until all necessary department and ',follow utilizing a single connection point $50 local governmental permits are issued in accordance with(c)of per dwelling unit this subsection.If the department does not concur in the connec- (iii)Other,with 100 AWDVTE or les $500 tion location,quantity,or design,both the applicant and the Iocal (iv)Fee per additional connection point.. .. . $50 governmental land use planning authority having jurisdiction (b)Category II base fees for one connection. over the development approval shall be notified,in writing,indi- (i)Less than 1,000 AWDVTE $ 1,000 cating the department's intent to deny the connection as proposed (ii) 1,000 to 1,500 AWDVTE . . .. $ 1,500 in the application.The written notification shall state the specific (iii)Fee per additional connection point.. . $250 reasons for the intent to deny the connection,the process for (c)Category III base fees for one connection. submitting an amended application,and the appeal rights of the (i) 1,500 to 2,500 AWDVTE . . .. $2,500 applicant.The applicant may submit a revised application within (ii)Over 2,500 AWDVTE $4,000 thirty days based on department comments and concerns as stated (iii)Fee per additional connection point $ 1,000 in the notification.The submittal of a revised application within (d)Category IV base fee per connection. ..$ 100 thirty days shall not require thepayment (2)Surety bond.Prior to the beginning of construction of anyedpermit any of aitio rel uis plication fees.Submittal of a revised is not a prerequisite connection,the department may require the permit holder to pro- for a request for an adjudicative proceeding in compliance with vide a surety bond as specified in WAC 468-34-020(3). WAC 468-51-150. (c)Permit issuance.The department shall issue the connection [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ permit after review and concurrence that the application and the 468-51-070,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW location and design of the connection comply with the require- 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-070,filed 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] ments of this chapter,and after either: (i)The applicant has received development approval from the appropriate local governmental land use planning authority;or 468-51-080 Application submittal,review,conditions. (1)Application submittal.The application shall be submitted to (ii)Other interagency coordination procedures in effect are the designated local department office serving the area.The appli- l atdfise pla development approval by the local governmental ion shall be properly prepared,clearly completed,and signed. land use planning authority. �!t'formation on the specific number of copies to be provided and The department shall provide the applicant with the connec- tion permit for signature,and the applicant shall sign and return other submittal information is available from the designated local department office. the permit to the department within thirty days after the mailing date.If the department does not receive the signed permit back (2)Application review,processing,and approval. Upon receipt of the application,the application shall be reviewed consistent from the applicant within thirty days after the mailing date or within an agreed upon time,the permit will be void and the appli- with the provisions of this chapter.If the department identifies errors in the application or if additional information is required, cation fee will be forfeited.The permit is not valid and construe- errors department will notify the applicant.Applicants must provide tion on the access cannot begin without a completed permit that is signed by both the department and the applicant. such information or correct errors within thirty days of the notifi- cation.If the applicant determines that the time to provide addi- Additionally,the applicant must be in compliance with the con- tional or corrected information is insufficient, the applicant shall surety bond comprequliance with WAC in the permit prior to contact the department in writing to request additional time be struction,in compliance WAC 468-51-070. approved.If the additional or corrected information has not been (d)Request for adjudicative proceedings.In the event of a denial of a connection permit as proposed in the application,the received by the department within thirty days or the approved time period agreed to,the application will be withdrawn. applicant may apply for an adjudicative proceeding in compli- (a)Review.Upon timely receipt of all required information, ance with WAC 468-51-150. or upon expiration of the time period for receipt of additional (3)Permit conditions.Any special requirements or provisions or corrected information,the location and design of the canner- for the connection including off-site mitigation shall be clearly tion shall be examined for consistency with current department and specifically identified as part of the permit.Failure by the location,quantity,spacing,classifications,and department design applicant or permit holder to abide by the permit provisions shall be sufficient standards.The review shall also include an analysis of the impact cause for the department to initiate action to alter the of the site's existing and projected traffic on the operation and connection or to revoke the permit and close the connection at the expense of the permit holder.The permit requirements shall safety of the state highway. (b)Concurrence or denial,notice.If the department concurs be binding on the permit holder,the permit holder's successors, ''te location and design of the proposed connection,written heirs and assigns,the permit application signatories,and all •�•ication of that concurrence will be sent to the applicant and future owners and occupants of the property.The applicant may to the local governmental land use planning authority having challenge the permit conditions by applying for an adjudicative jurisdiction over the development.If the applicant has gone proceeding in compliance with WAC 468-51-150. 6 v d [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ standards by a professional or the department ed in dothe dance 468-51-080,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW with chapter 18.43RCW, in the developer inspec- 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14444,§468-51-080,filed tion at the applicant's expense,as provided 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.) agreement. 468-51-090 Construction requirements. [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ (1)Preconstruction conference.The department may require a 468-51-090,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW preconstruction conference prior to any work being performed on 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-090,filed the department's right of way.When required by provisions in the 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] permit,the department will schedule a preconstruction confer- ence.The preconstruction conference should be attended by the 468-51-100 Nonconforming connection permits. The depart- necessary personnel to assure compliance with the terms and ment may issue a permit for a connection not meeting department provisions of the permit. location and spacing criteria standards if it finds that a conform- (2)Time limit. Substantial construction of the connection shall ing connection is not attainable at the time of the permit applica- begin within ninety days of the effective date of the permit,un- tion submittal and that denial would leave the property without a less a longer time is approved by the department or a time exten- reasonable access to the public road system.The department may sion is requested by the applicant and approved by the depart- issue a connection permit requiring a legally enforceable joint- ment.Construction shall be completed within one hundred twenty use connection when determined to be in the best interest of the days of the date of issuance of the permit,unless a time extension state for restoring or maintaining the operational efficiency and is approved by the department.As a condition of the permit,the safety of the state highway.Nonconforming connection permits department may further limit construction time,if the department shall specify conditions or limits including: determines that such limitation is warranted.Failure to comply (1)Traffic volume.The maximum vehicular usage of the con- with the time limits specified in the permit shall result in an nection shall be specified in the permit. automatic expiration of the permit following written notification (2)Future alternate access.The permit shall specify that a con- to the permit holder.For any permit which expires for failure to forming connection be constructed when future alternate means begin construction or to complete construction within the speci- of access become available,and that the nonconforming connec- fied time limits,the department may require a new application, tion be removed. including the payment of the required application fee prior to the (3)Users.The permit shall specify the properties to be served initiation of any construction. by the connection;and any other conditions as necessary to carry (3)Posting of permit.The approved connection permit shall out the provisions of chapter 47.50 RCW. be displayed in a prominent location,protected from the weather, Naiiiii within the vicinity of the connection construction. [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ 468-51-100,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW (4)Disruption of traffic.All construction and/or maintenance 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-100,filed within department right of way shall conform to the provisions of 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] the connection permit,the"Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices"(MUTCD);the department's current"Design Manual," 468-51-105 Variance connection permits. Variance permits and the current"Standard Specifications for Road,Bridge,and may be issued,at the discretion of the department,for certain Municipal Construction."The department may require or restrict connections not meeting the access classification location and hours of construction to minimize disruption of traffic on the state by the highway system.If constructionspacing or that exceed the number of connections allowed activity within the department's standards adopted for a particular highway segment.These per- right of way causes undue disruption of traffic or creates safety mils may be allowed if conditions warrant and are demonstrated hazards on a state highway,or if the construction activity is not to the satisfaction of the department by a traffic analysis,signed in compliance with the traffic control specifications in the permit, and sealed by a qualified professional engineer who is registered the department shall advise the permit holder or the permit in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW,which is included with holder's contractor of the need for immediate corrective action, the connection permit application.The variance permit will and may order immediate suspension of all or part of the work remain in effect unless a new permit is required due to changes if deemed necessary.Failure to comply with this provision may in property site use in compliance with WAC 468-51-110 or un- result in permit modification or revocation. less permit modification,revocation,or closure of the variance (5)Traffic signals and other traffic control devices.Traffic ermitted connection is required as provided for in WAC 468-51- signals and other traffic control devices installed by the permit 120 The department may issue a connection permit requiring a holder shall conform to MUTCD and department design and con- legally enforceable joint-use connection when it is determined to struction standards.The permit holder is responsible for securing be in the best interest of the state for restoring or maintaining the any state and local permits needed for traffic signalization and operational efficiency and safety of the state highway.Variance regulatory signing and marking. connection permits shall specify conditions or limits including, (6)Connection construction inspection.For Category II and but not limited to: Category III connections,the department may require the permit (1)Traffic volume.The maximum vehicular usage of the corm holder,the developer,or landowner to provide inspection of n shall be specified ithe permit. construction and certification that connection construction is in nection(2)Users.The permit shall specify the properties to be served accordance with permit provisions and appropriate department by the connection,and any other conditions as necessary to carry 7 ♦11.J.L 1 lJL(4j.IlaNl Ay LVl A6,16+16,70 1 Vl A WA V1.saa,11, lraa{lataL�ta L vv ai.abaa V r 64.7 v out the provisions of chapter 47.50 RCW. (a)Notification,correction of deficiencies.The department shall serve notice,in accordance with rules adopted in compli- [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ ance with chapter 34.05 RCW,to the permit holder,permit 468-51-105,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.] holder's successors or assigns,or property owner with a copy 8-51-110 Changes in roe to the occupant,for any connection found to be in noncompli- p p rty site use. The connection ance with the conditions of the permit or this chapter.The notice permit is issued to the permit holder for a particular type of land will identify and request that the deficiencies be corrected within use generating specific projected traffic volumes at the final stage thirty days of service of the notice.The notice shall further advise of proposed development.Any changes made in the use,intensity that the department's determination of noncompliance or defi- of development,type of traffic,or traffic flow of the property re- ciencies shall become final and conclusive thirty calendar days quires the permit holder,his or her assignee,or property owner to following service of the notice unless the violations are corrected contact the department to determine if further analysis is needed or an adjudicative proceeding in compliance with chapter 34.05 to determine if the change is significant and would require a new RCW and WAC 468-51-150 is requested by the permit holder, permit and modifications to the connection.An engineering study, permit holder's successor or assigns, signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in accor- permit the holder's property owner. dance with chapter 18.43 RCW,may be required to document the (2)Costs.The permit holder, successor or extent of the change.If modification of the existingconnection assignee,or property owner shall be responsible for the costs of closure due to revocation of a connection permit in compliance is required, based on a significant change as determined by the with WAC 468-51-120 except when the closure is required by department,the permit holder,his or her assignee,or the property changes to the state highway. owner shall obtain a new permit prior to the initiation of any on- (3)Emergency action.This chapter shall not restrict the site construction to the connection or to the property. department's right to take immediate remedial action,including (1)Significant change.A significant change is one that would the closure of a connection if there is an immediate and serious cause a change in the category of the connection permit or one danger to the public health,safety,and welfare,in compliance that causes an operational,safety,or maintenance problem on the with chapter 47.32 RCW.In such event,the department shall con- state highway system based on objective engineering criteria or form to the provisions for emergency adjudicative proceedings in available accident data. Such data shall be provided to the prop- RCW 34.05.479 and rules adopted thereunder. erty owner and/or permit holder and tenant upon written request. (2)Notification. Failure to contact the department to deter- [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ mine the need for connection modifications or to apply for a 468-51-120,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW *--w permit for such modifications prior to initiation of property 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-120,filed r rovements,land use changes or traffic flow alteration actions 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] MI result in notification to the property owner and/or permit holder and tenant of intent to revoke the existing permit and do- 468-51-130 Closure of unpermitted connections. Closure criteria,permit requirements.Any unpermitted connections to the sure of the connection to the property. (3)Costs.The permit holder is responsible for all costs associ- state highway system which were in existence and in active use ated with connection removal,relocation,or modification caused consistent with the type of connection on July I, 1990,shall not require the issuance of a permit and may continue to provide con- by increased or altered traffic flows necessitated by changes to facilities,use,or to the nature of the business on the property. nection to the state highway system, unless the property owner had received written notification initiating connection closure [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ from the department prior to July 1, 1990,or unless the depart- 468-51-110,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW ment determines that the unpermitted connection does not meet 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-110,filed minimum acceptable standards of highway safety and mobility 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] based on accident and/or traffic data or accepted traffic engineer- 468-51-120 Permit modification,revocation,closure ofper- ing criteria,a copy of which must be provided to the property mitred connections. owner and/or permit holder and tenant upon written request.The department may require that a permit be obtained if a significant (1)Revocation criteria.All connection permits issued by the change occurs in the use,desi department prior to the effective date of this chapter remain valid �,or traffic flow of the connection until revoked.The department may initiate an action to revoke or of the state highway. If a permit is not obtained,the department may initiate action to close the unpermitted connection point in any permit if significant changes have occurred in the use,design, compliance with RCW 47.50.040.Any unpermitted connection or traffic flow of the property or of the state highway,requiring opened subsequent to July 1, 1990,is subject to closure by the the relocation,alteration,or closure of the connection;if the con- nection was not constructed at the location or to the desi eci- department.The process to be followed by the department in the gn s P closure of an unpermitted connection shall be consistent with fled in the permit;if the permit provisions were not met;or if the pter 5 RCW and rules adopted thereunder.The notifica- connection causes a safety,maintenance,or operational problem tion process is as follows: r- `he state highway system.The process to be followed by the 1 fitment in the revocation of permits shall be consistent with ( )Notification.The department shall serve notice,in accor- therequirements of chapter 34.05 RCW and WAC 468-51-150. dance with rules adopted in compliance with chapter 34.05 RCW, upon the property owner of a connection to a state highway The notification process is as follows: which is found by the department to be unpermitted.This notice 8 V V a c shall clearly describe the highway connection violation and shall than the routine replacemee diffent of rential existing connection,the owner ' establish a thirty-day time limit for either applying for a connec- shall also participate n tion permit or requesting an adjudicative proceeding in compli- (7)Work by permit holder's contractor.The department shall ance with chapter 34.05 RCW.The notice will further advise the require that work done by the owner's contractor be accom- property owner that failure to act in either of the prescribed ways plished at the completion of the department's contract or be within the time period will result in department closure of the scheduled so softorequire einterfere surety bond priorreo nis c ttrcact( oS on unpermitted connection. The departmentmay q r (2)Permit application.If a permit application is filed within of the connection in accordance with WAC 468-51-070.When the thirty days,and the application is denied,the department shall the number,location or design of existing access connections to notify the property owner of the denial.The property owner may the state highway are being modified by a department construc- then proceed with the permit application revision process set tion project,the resulting modified access connections sshall forth in WAC 468-51-080 or request an adjudicative proceeding provide the same general functionality for the existingrollerty in compliance with WAC 468-51-150 within thirty days.Failure use as they did before the modification,taking into consideration to act in either of those prescribed ways within the time period set the existing site design,normal vehicle types,and traffic circula- forth in the rules will result in department closure of the unper- tion requirements. mitted connection. If the location and design of the connection in Notification.The department shall notify affected property the permit application are acceptable to the department,the exist- owners,permit holders,business owners and/or emergency ser- ing connection may continue to be used for a specified period of vices,in writing,where appropriate,whenever the department's time or until the connection specified in the permit application is work program requires the modification,relocation,or replace- constructed. ment of their access connections.In addition to written notifica- (3)Approval conditions.Modifications,relocation,or closure tion,the department shall facilitate,where appropriate, public, of unpermitted connections may be required by the department process which may include,but is not limited to,public as a requirement of permit approval,subject to the adjudicative meetings or hearings,and/or individual meetings.The depart- proceedings provisions of WAC 468-51-150. ment shall provide the interested parties with the standards and principles of access management. [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ 468-51-130,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-034(Order 187),§ 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.92-14-044,§468-51-130,filed 468-51-140, 6-1 1 and chapter 2/2r 99,47. effective ectivRCW9/284-044,§468-51-140,filed/99.Statutory Authority: CW 6/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] 476/24/92,effective 7/25/92.] 468-51-140 Department construction projects. During con- struction of department projects,connections will be provided as 1 A lrcation.Any person who has standing to challenge the replacements for existing approved permitted connections,that denial of a permit app lrcation in compliance with WAC 468-51- are consistent with all current department spacing,location,and 080;a permit with onditions in compliance with WAC 468-51- design standards,based on the following conditions: (1)Nonconforming connections.All nonconforming connec- 080;a notice of permit modification,revocation,or closure of tions will be examined to determine if the construction project permitted connection in compliance with WAC 468-51-120;or will require relocation,alteration,or closure of the connection to notice of closure of an unpermitted connection in compliance make it conforming. with WAC 468-51-130 may apply for an adjudicative proceed- (2)Application of current standards.The number and location ing on the matter in compliance with chapter 34.05 RCW,rules of connections shall be modified to the maximum extent pos- adopted thereunder,and department rules within thirty days of the sible to meet current department spacing,location,and design date the initial determination of the department is sent by certified standards.Where current department standards cannot be met,the mail. connection shall be classified as nonconforming. (2)Conduct.Thereafter,and within the times set forth by (3)New connections,modifications.The department shall chapter 34.05 RCW,rules adopted thereunder,and department allow new or require modification of existing connections if a rules,the department shall convene an adjudicative proceeding. connection permit application is made and approved. The proceeding shall be conducted in compliance with chapter (4)Replacement of existing connections.When connections 34.05 RCW,rules adopted thereunder,and department rules. are made as part of a department construction project replac- (3)Failure to apply.Failure to apply for an adjudicative pro- ing existing connection points without material differences,no ceeding within the times set forth in subsection(1)of this section additional permit shall be required.Costs shall be borne by the shall result in the adoption of the department's initial determina- tion as its final determination. department. 4 Failure to participate.Failure to attend or otherwise par- nection(5)New connections--Cost.The construction of new con- ticipate in an adjudicative proceeding may result in a finding of points,if approved by the department,shall be done at P the owner's expense by either the department's contractor as part default. of the roadway improvement or by the owner's contractor at the (5)Reasonableness of access.The department in its regulatior department's option. of connections in compliance with chapter 47.50 RCW and these (6)Modifications—Cost.If the modification of the connection regulations shall allow reasonable access.If the department's fi- point,that are based on the owner's request,is more extensive nal order denies reasonable access,the appellant shall be entitled 9 'VT ULV 1 1J1Q114a14J 11.71 c-A.l.l,1..00 1 16,1illlb{.i116 vla v....ev aa..aa Chapter 468-52 WAC closest edge of the traveled way of the intersecting road to the Highway Access Management— closest edge of the traveled way of the connection measured Access Control Classification System and Standards along the traveled way(through lanes). st Update:2/25/99 (8)"Department"means the Washington state department of Niro' transportation. Sections (9)"Governmental entity"means,for the purpose of this chap- 468-52-010 Purpose. ter,a unit of local government or officially designated transports- 468-52-020 Definitions. tion authority that has the responsibility for planning,construe 468-52-030 General. tion;operation,maintenance,or jurisdiction over transportation 468-52-040 Access control classification system and standards. (10)facilities. de connection on a state 468-52-050 Application of access control classification system highway`with a road or tersection" stret duly eeans an at st blish d as a public road or standards. public street by the local governmental entity. 468-52-060 Assignment of access control classifications to high-segments. g (11)"Joint use connection"mens a single connection point that serves as a connection to more than one property or develop- 468-52-070 Review and modification of classifications. ment,including those in different ownerships or in which access 468-52-010 Purpose. This chapter is adopted in accordance rights are provided in the legal descriptions. (12)with chapter 47.50 RCW for the implementation of an access especially designed or desigaccess nate means a highway or streffic,and et control classification system and standards for the regulation and from,or to which owners or occupants thof abuttough ing land,or other control of vehicular ingress to,and egress from the state highway persons have no right or easement,or only a limited right or ease- system. ment of access,light,view,or air by reason of the fact that their [Statutory Authority:RCW 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.93-03- property abuts upon such limited access facility,or for any other 033(Order 135),§468-52-010,filed 1/13/93,effective 2/13/93.] reason to accomplish the purpose of a limited access facility. (13)"Nonconforming connection"means a connection not 468-52-020 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter,the meeting current department location,spacing,or design criteria. following definitions of the terms shall apply unless the context (14)"Permit"means written approval issued by the depart- clearly indicates otherwise: ment,subject to conditions stated therein,authorizing construe- (1)"Average daily traffic(ADT)"means the volume of traffic tion,reconstruction,maintenance,or reclassification of a state hing a point or segment of a highway, to the de departconnectment's and associatedfatraffic control devices on or in both directions,aur- to the department's right of way. ing a period of time,divided by the number of days in the period and factored to represent an estimate of traffic volume for an (15)"Permitting authority"means the department or any county,municipality,or transportation authority authorized to average day of the year. (2)"Conforming connection"means a connection that meet regulate access to their respective transportation systems. current department location,spacing,and design criteria. (16)"State highway system"means all roads,streets,and (3)"Connection"means approaches,driveways,turnouts,or highways designated as state routes in compliance with chapter other means of providing for the right of access to or from con- 47.17 RC W. (17)"Reasonable access"means an access connection that is trolled access facilities on the state highway system. (4)"Connection permit"means a written authorizationgiven suitable for the existing and/or proposed property use and does by the department for a specifically designed connection to ie notadverselyaffect the safety,operations or maintenance of the state highway system at a specific location for a specific state highway system. p p type and (18)"Variance permit"means a special nonconforming or intensity of property use and specific volume of traffic for the proposed connection,based on the final stage of proposed revel- additional connection permit,issued for a location not normally opment of the applicant's roe The actual form used for this permitted by current department standards,after an engineering property.rty study demonstrates,to the satisfaction of the department,that the authorization will be determined by the department. connection will not adversely affect the safety,maintenance or (5)"Contiguous parcels"means two or more pieces of real operation of the highway in accordance with its assigned classifi- property under the same ownership with one or more boundaries cation.This permit will remain valid until modified or revoked by that touch and have similarity of use. (6)"Controlled access facility"means a transportation facility the permitting authority. (excluding limited access facilities as defined in chapter 47.52 [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-035(Order 188),§ RCW)to which access is regulated by the governmental entity 468-52-020,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW having jurisdiction over the facility.Owners or occupants of abut- 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.93-03-033(Order 135),§468-52- ting lands and other persons have a right of access to and from 020,filed 1/13/93,effective 2/13/93.] such facility at such points only and in such manner as may be -mined by the governmental entity. 468-52-030 General. The connection and intersection spacing 7)"Corner clearance"means the distance from an intersec- distances specified in this chapter are minimums.Greater dis- tion of a public or private road to the nearest connection along tances may be required by the department on individual permits a controlled access facility.This distance is measured from the issued in accordance with chapter 468-51 WAC to provide desir- 10 a a able traffic operational and safety characteristics.If greater dis- mile spacing may exists.permitted,but only when no reasonable tances are required,the department will document,as part of the alternative shall aresponse to a connection permit application in compliance with (ii)Private direct access to the state n�otayr reasonable ac- not be chapter 468-51 WAC,the reasons,based on traffic engineering permitted except when the property has o principles,that such greater distances are required.Nonconform- cess to the general street system.The following standards will Y png permits may be issued in accordance with chapter 468-51 applied when direct access must be provided: WAC allowing for less than minimum spacing where no other (A)The access connection shall continue until such time that reasonable access exists,or a variance connection permit may be other reasonable access to a highway with a less restrictive ac- issued where it can be substantiated by a traffic analysis,to the cess control classification or access to the general street system satisfaction of the department,through the permit application pro- becomes available and is permitted. cess that allowing less than the minimum spacing or more than (B)The minimum distance to another public or private access the maximum number ofconnections, state ighs,way inuld not adversely accordance with the affect Nonconforming connection permits may bection shall be one thousand three e hundred d to provide the desired function of the state highwayor location ac- assigned access classification,and would not adversely affect the cess to parcels whose highway frontage,topography, safety,maintenance or operation of the state highway. would otherwise preclude cal connectionorming Priever, ariane permits are not owed.No more than [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-035(Order 188),§ one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to 468-52-030,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW contiguous parcels under the same ownership. 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.93-03-033(Order 135),§468-52- (C)All private direct access shall be for right turns only on 030,filed 1/13/93,effective 2/13/93.] multilane facilities,unless special conditions warrant and are documented by a traffic analysis in the connection permit ap- 468-52-040 Access control classification system and stan- plication,signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer, dards. This section provides an access control classification sys- re istered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW. tern consisting of five classes.The functional characteristics and g(D)No additional access connections to the state highway the access control design standards for each class are described. shall be provided for newly created parcels resulting from The classes are arranged from the most restrictive,class one,to property divisions.All access for such parcels shall be provided the least restrictive,class five.This access control classification by internal road networks.Access to the state highway will be at system does not include highways or portions thereof that have existing permitted connection locations or at revised connection been established as limited access highways in compliance with locations,as conditions warrant. chapter 47.52 RCW.For state highways that are planned for the (iii)A restrictive median shall be provided on multilane establishment of limited access control in accordance with the facilities to separate opposing traffic movements and to prevent Master Plan for Limited Access Highways,an access control unauthorized turning movements. classification will be assigned to each highway segment to remain (2)Class two. in effect until such time that the facility is established as a limited (a)Functional characteristics: access facility. These highways have the capacity for medium to high speeds On all access classes,property access shall be located and de- and medium to high volume traffic movements over medium and signed to minimize interference with transit facilities and/or high long distances in a safe and efficient manner,providing for inter- occupancy vehicle(HOV)facilities on state highways where such regional,intercity,and intracity travel needs.Direct access ser- facilities exist or where such facilities are proposed in a state, vice to abutting land is subordinate to providing service to traffic regional,metropolitan,or local transportation plan.In such cases, movement.Highways in this class are typically distinguished by if reasonable access is available from the general street system, existing or planned restrictive medians,where multilane facplp- primary property access shall be provided from the general street ties are warranted,and minimum distances between public and system rather than from the state highway. private connections. (1)Class one. (b)Access control design standards: (a)Functional characteristics: (i)It is the intent that the design of class two highways be These highways have the capacity for safe and efficient high generally capable of achieving a posted speed limit of thirty-five speed and/or high volume traffic movements,providing for inter- to fifty mph in urbanized areas and forty-five to fifty-five mph in state,interregional,and intercity travel needs and some intracity rural areas.Spacing of intersecting streets,roads,and highways travel needs.Service to abutting land is subordinate to providing shall be planned with a minimum spacing of one-half mile.Less service to major traffic movements.Highways in this class are typically distinguished by a highly controlled,limited number of than one-half mile intersection spacing may be permitted,butonly when no reasonable alternative access exists.In urban areas public and private connections,restrictive medians with limited and developing areas where higher volumes are present or growth median openings on multilane facilities,and infrequent traffic that will require signalization is expected in the foreseeable signals. future,it is imperative that the location of any public access be (b)Access control design standards: planned carefully to ensure adequate signal progression.Addition (i)It is the intent that the design of class one highways be gen- of all new connections,public or private,that may require signal erally capable of achieving a posted speed limit of fifty to sixty- ization will require an engineering analysis signed and sealed by five mph.Spacing of intersecting streets,roads,and highways a qualified professional engineer,registered in accordance with shall be planned with a minimum spacing of one mile.One-half chapter 18.43 RCW. 11 r♦1-7L1.-/1 U6Q1111Q1 11J 1V1 AVVVOD y V1 SVil LyLvm, l,iM1aMC Vl.F Lair�.Vv�a tie •, . O L�� s�•y (ii)Private direct access to the state highway system shall be where special conditions warrant and mainline traffic volumes are permitted only when the property has no other reasonable access below 25,000 ADT.Development of properties with internal road to the general street system or if access to the general street sys- networks and joint access connections are encouraged. tem would cause traffic operational conditions or safety concerns acceptable to the local governmental entity.When direct access (i)Itis the ntentAccessol that thgdedesign of class three highways be �?!l'ust be provided,the following conditions shall apply: y (A)The access connection shall continue until such time that fortyrmph in urbanized areas and focapable of achieving a rtyfi eted eto Hy-five thirty to other reasonable access to a highway with a less restrictive access rural areas. In rural areas,spacing of intersecting streets,roads, ftY mph in control classification or acceptable access to the general street and highways shall be planned with a minimum spacing of one- system becomes available and is permitted. half may be (B)The minimum distance to another public or private access permittted,but le.Lessonly when no reasonable al ernative acan one-half mile intersection cess exists. connection shall be six hundred sixty feet.Nonconforming con- In urban areas and developing areas where higher volumes are nection permits may be issued to provide access to parcels whose present or growth that will require signalization highway frontage,topography,or location would otherwisepre- a is expected in the dude issuance of a conforming connection foreseeable future,it is imperative that the location of any public permit.No more than access be planned carefully to ensure adequate signal progres- one connection shall be provided to an individual parcel or to sion. Where contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless the highway mately require signalize ion shall besible,majort ing planned with roadways Amin m u of frontage exceeds one thousand three hundred twenty feet and it one-half mile spacing.Addition of all new connections,public or can be shown that the additional access would not adversely af- private, that may require signalization will require an engineering fect the desired function of the state highway in accordance with analysis signed by a qualed prof the assigned access classification,and would not adversely affect registered iacordanceandewith chapterd 18.43 RCW essional engineer, the safety or operation of the state highway. (C)Variance permits may be allowed if conditions warrant and (ii)Private direct access: (ANo more than one access shall be prvided to an indi- are demonstrated to the satisfaction of the department by a traffic vidual)parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership analysis,signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer, unless it can be shown that additiol accesswho is registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW,which adversely affect the desired funct on of the state thighwould not way in ac is included with the connection permit application. cordance with the assigned access classification,and would not (D)All private direct access shall be for right turns only on warrant and are adversely affect the safety or operation,of the state highway. multilane facilities,unless special conditions nonstrated,to the satisfaction of the department,bya traffic (B)The minimum distance to another public or private access lis,signed connection shall be three hundred thirty feet.Nonconforming 'tiiiiefiY and sealed by a qualified professional engineer, connection permits may be issued to provide access to parcels who is registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW,in- eluded with the connection permit application and only if left turn wise preclude ais y yuana of aoconforming connection permit. frontage,topography,or location would other- channelization is provided. (E)No additional access to the highway (C)Variance permits may be allowed if conditions warrant and shallbeprovided or acres created connectionspantols three state i y are demonstrated to the satisfaction of the department by a traffic analysis, sealed by a qualified property divisions.All access for such parcels shall be provided who isregisstter d in accordance cwith chapter 18.43 RCWfessionalgw is by internal road networks.Access to the state highway will be at is included with the connection permit application. which existing permitted connection locations or at revised connection locations,as conditions warrant. (4)Class four. (iii)On multilane facilities a restrictive median shall be ro- (a)Functional characteristics: vided to se crate o P These highways have the capacity for moderate travel speeds P pposing traffic movements and to prevent un- and moderate traffic volumes for medium and short travel authorized turning movements;however,a nonrestrictive median distances providing for intercity,intracity,and intercommunity or a two way left turn lane may be used when special conditions travel needs.There is a reasonable balance between direct access exist and mainline volumes are below 20,000 ADT. and mobility needs for highways in this class.This class is to be (3)Class three. (a)Functional characteristics: used primarily where the existing level of development of the adjoining land is more intensive and where the probability of ma- These highways have the capacity for moderate travels speeds and moderate traffic volumes for medium and short travel P jor land use changes is less probable than on class three highway segments.Highways in this class are typically distinguished by distances providing for intercity,intracity,and intercommunity existing or planned nonrestrictive medians.Restrictive medi- travel needs.There is a reasonable balance between direct ac- cess and mobility needs for highways in this class.This class is ans may be used as operational conditions warrant to mitigate to be used primarily where the existing level of development of spa ing standards should be aing,weaving,and pplied 1 edif adjoining icts.Minimum connection the adjoining land is less intensive than maximum buildout and redeveloped. PP properties are '•''ere the probability of significant land use change and increased (b)Access control design standards: tic demand is high.Highways in this class are typically (i)It is the intent that the design of class four highways be Minguished by planned restrictive medians,where multilane facilities are warranted,and minimum distances between public thirty-five a mph in urbay capable of nized areas and thirty-fivehieving a posted speed to forty-fiveit of s and private connections.Two-way left-turn-lanes may be utilized mph in rural areas.In rural areas,spacing of intersecting streets, , 12 ads and highways shall be planned with a minimum spacing unless it can affect the desired hown that function of the state highway in ac- dditional access points would not - may one-half mile.Less than one-half mile intersection spacing adversely ma be permitted,but only when no reasonable alternative accecordance with thee afety accessr opss classification, the state highway. not Y p areas where higher volumesadversely exists.rrIn toagareas hd developing expected are present or growth that will require signalization isof an connBect on shal b on hundred twnty-five feet Noncoprivate nform el in the foreseeable future,itis imperative that the locationY .00 that maywhose highway frontage,topography,or location would other- ultimately access be planned carefully to ensure adequate signal pro- ing connection permits may be issued to provide access to pare s gression.Where feasible,major intersecting roadways of a permit• require signalization shall be planned with a minimum wise precludeVarianissuance conforminge allowed connectionif ions and of one-half mile spacing.Addition of all new connections,public ( ) permitsmaydepartment warrant a traffic or private,that may require signalization will require an engi- are demonstrated to the satisfaction of theprofessionalpartetengineer, neering analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional analysis,signed and sealed by a q engineer,registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW. who is ristereinccordtce with apsappe1843 RCW,which (ii)P e direct access: is included with apermit ation. for coections No more than one access shall be provided to an indi- (6 oCorner lthe minimum donnearance.Corner e ton spacing requirementsl vidual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership meetr exceed not of the be placed unless it can be shown that additional access points la n ac- been asppgned a classification.A singlelicable access class where s highway connection segment h adversely affect the desired function of the statehighway cordance with the assigned access classification,and wOuad not tone rocess specified in chapter 468-51 WAC, nd in accordance to the intersection,in compliance with the permit applica- adversely affect the safety or operation of the state hlgly P (B)The minimum distance to another public or private access with the following criteria: connection shall be two hundred fifty feet.Nonconforming con- (a)If,due to property size,corner clearance standards of this vection permits may be issued to provide access to parcels whose chaphe mimtum corner cbe met,anlearwhance standards cannot be obtained, ere joint access meeting or exceed- highway frontage,topography,or location would otherwise ing preclude issuance of a conforming connection permit. or is determined by the department to be not feasible because of (C)Variance permits may be allowed if conditions warrant and conflicting luse thenthe for llowingicting tminimum corner clearance c volumes or operational are demonstrated to the satisfaction of the department by a trafficcharacteristics, analysis,signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer, criteria may be used: who is registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW,which CORNER CLEARANCE AT INTERSECTIONS is included with the connection permit application. Nestio (5)Class five. With Restrictive Median (a)Functional characteristics: Position Access Allowed Minimum(feet) These highways have the capacity for moderate travel speedsRight In/Right Out 115 and moderate traffic volumes for primarily short travel distances Approaching providing for intracity and intracommunity trips primarily for inaction access to state highways of higher classification.Access needs Right In Only 75 g higher than the need for through traffic mobility Approachin may generally be without compromising the public health,welfare,or safety.These intersectionght In/Right Out 230*Right highways will generally have nonrestrictive medians. Departing intersection (b)Access control design standards: Right Out Only 100 (i)It is the intent that the design of class five high way Departing be ptn g capable of achieving a posted speed limit of twenty-five to thirty- intersection five mph.In rural areas,spacing of intersecting streets,roads, and highways shall be planned with a minimum spacing of one- quarter Without Restrictive Median quarter mile.Less than one-quarter mile spacing may be permit- Access Allowed Minimum(feet) ted where no reasonable alternative exists.In urban areas and Position developing areas where higher volumes are present or growth that230* Approaching will require signalization is expected in the foreseeable future, intersection it is imperative that the location of any public access be planned Approaching seioRight In Only 100 carefully to ensure adequate signal progression.Where feasible, major intersecting roadways that may ultimately require signal- intersection �� 230* ization shall be planned with a minimum of one-quarter mile Departing spacing.Addition of all new connections,public or private,that intersection may require signalization will require an engineering analysis Departing Right Out Only 100 signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer,registered intersection in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW. (ii)Private direct access: vided to an indi- *For Access Class 5 and for speeds less than thirty-five mph,one (A) more than n i bus undeshall be r the same ownership hundred twenty-five feet may be used. vidual parcel or to contiguous parcels13 I ♦V 1,71.1%-,1 A11111111{/1 1147Ill,1 ta.yyy,,,,V y ya aaa (b)In cases where connections are permitted under the above due to changes in property site use in compliance with WAC criteria,the permit issued in compliance with chapter 468-51 468-51-110 or unless permit modification,revocation,or closure WAC shall contain the following additional conditions: of the permitted connection is required in compliance with WAC (i)There shall be no more than one connection per property 468-51-120. rtage on the state highway. fin✓. (ii)When joint or alternate access meeting or exceeding the [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-035(Order 188),§ minimum corner clearance standards becomes available,the per- 468-52-050,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW mit holder shall close the permitted connection,unless the permit 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.93-03-033(Order 135),§468-52- holder shows to the department's satisfaction that such closure is 050,filed 1/13/93,effective 2/13/93.] not feasible. (iii)Variance permits are not allowed. 468-52-060 Assignment of access control classifications to highway segments. The assignment of an access control clas- [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-035(Order 188),§ sification to all controlled access segments of the state highway 468-52-040,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:RCW system shall be the responsibility of the department.The process 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.93-03-033(Order 135),§468-52- to be followed in assigning the classifications is as follows: 040,filed 1/13/93,effective 2/13/93.] (1)Defining segments.The determination of the length and 468-52-050 Application of access control classifications stem termini of segments shall be the responsibility of the department standards. Y working in cooperation with the Regional Transportation Plan- ning Organizations,Metropolitan Planning Organizations,and the (I)Review of permits on classified highway segments. Con- appropriate local governmental entities. nection permit applications on controlled access facilities of the particular segment (a)Segments of highways to be assigned to a particular ac- state highway system received on a particulbe reviewed cess control classification shall be defined by the department in been classified in accordance with this chapter shall subject to the requirements of this chapter in compliance with the cooperation operation with local governments.The length and termini of permit application process specified in chapter 468-51 WAC. seg shall take into consideration the mobility and access needs of the traveling public,the access needs of the existing and (2)Prior approvals.Connections permitted prior to the adop- proposed land use abuttingthe highway tion of this chapter and unpermitted connections that do not g Yroad segment,and the existing require closure in accordance with WAC 468-51-030 are not re- and desired mobility characteristics of the roadway.The number ed of classification changes occurring along a particular highway quired to meet the interim standards or the standards of assigned shall be minimized to provide highway system continuity,unifor- -ess classifications adopted in compliance with this chapter. mity,and inte vosse,,3)New permits required by chapter 468-51 WAC.All new �h'to the maximum extent feasible.The segments connection permits required due to significant changes in ro _ shall not necessarily be confined by local jurisdictional boundaz- erty site use in compliance with WAC 468-51-110 or p p ies.Points of transition between classifications along a particular modification in compliance with WAC 468-51-120 shall be abute should be located on boundaries,or coincident with identifi- reviewedsubject to the requirements of this chapter. able physical features. con- (4)Permits approved under interim standards.Connection (2)Assignment of classifications.All segments of all as- permits that were issued in accordance with the interim standards trolled access facilities on the state highway system shall be in WAC 468-52-040t were on a highway segmentsigned to one of the access control classes one through five.The gh Y where an access clas- assignment of a classification to a specific sification had not been adopted shall remain in effect after adop- P segment of highway tion of an access classification on that highway segmentp shall be the responsibility of the department.The classification a newn an t is ased due on inpropertya unless shall be made in cooperation with the Regional Transportation changes site use in Planning Organization,Metropolitan Planning Organization, compliance with WAC 468-51-110 or unless permit modification, and the appropriate local governmental entities.For city streets revocation,or closure of the permitted connection is required in that are designated as state highways in compliance with chapter compliance with WAC 468-51-120. q 47.24 RCW,the department will obtain concurrence in the final (5)Nonconforming permits.Nonconforming permits may be class assignment from the city or town for those state highways issued in accordance with WAC 468-51-100 for certain connec- where the city or town is the permitting authority.The assign- tions not meeting the interim standards in WAC 468-52-040 or the access classification location and spacing standards adopted s:ment a classification shall take into consideration the following facto P facto for a particular highwayrs: segment. (6)Variance permits.Variance permits may be issued in accor (a)Local land use plans,zoning,and land development regu- dance with WAC 468-51-105 for certain connections not meeting lations as set forth in adopted comprehensive plans; the access classification standards for location,spacing or exceed (b)The current and potential functional classification of the the number of connections allowed by the standards adopted for highway; a particular highway segment.These permits may be allowed if ( )Existing and projected future traffic volumes; conditions warrant and are demonstrated to the satisfaction of the (d)Existing and projected state,local,and metropolitan rtment by a traffic analysis,signed and sealed bya qualified planning organization transportation plans and needs including consideration a new or improved parallel facilities; �essional engineer who is registered in accordance with chap- (e)Drainage requirements• ter 18.43 RCW, and included in the connection permit applica- ' tion,and will remain in effect unless a new permit is required (�The character of the lands adjoining the highway; (g)The type and volume of traffic requiring access; 14 segment shall do so through the local governmental entity,MPO, . (h)Other operational aspects of access,including corridor ac- or RTPO. cident history; ter 47.50 RCW.99-06-035(Order 188),§ (i)The availability of reasonable access to the state highway [Statutory Authority:Chap by way of county roads or city streets as an alternative to a con- 468-52-070,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:468-52 W nection to the state highway; 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.93-03-033(Order 135),§ (j)The cumulative effect of existing and projected connections 070,filed 1/13/93,effective 2/13/93.] Nod on the state highway system's ability to provide for the safe and efficient movement of people and goods within the state. (3)Changes in jurisdiction.When the boundaries of an incorporated city or town are revised to include a portion of a controlled access state highway resulting in a change in the permitting authority from the department to the city or town in accordance with chapter 47.24 RCW,the access classification of that portion of the statehighway ACC all remain 52 070.unchanged unless modified in accordance [Statutory Authority:Chapter 47.50 RCW.99-06-035(Order 188),§ 468-52-060,filed 2/25/99,effective 3/28/99.Statutory Authority:CW 447.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCW.93-03-033(Order 135),§ 060,filed 1/13/93,effective 2/13/93.1 468-52-070 Review and modification of classifications. (1)Department initiated action.The department may,at any time,initiate a review of the access control classification of any segment of any state highway.When a major change occurs in any of the factors noted in WAC 468-52-060(2),the department shall review the access classification for the specific segments of any state highway affected by the change.Prior to the initiation of any change in classification of a highway segment,theart- de depart- ment shall notify in writing the appropriate Regional spor - tion Planning Organization,Metropolitan Planning Organization, and local governmental entities.The department will consult with the RTPO,MPO,and local governmental entities and shall take into consideration,any comments or concerns received during the review process.For city streets that are designated as state high- ways in compliance with chapter 47.24 RCW,the department will obtain concurrence in the final class assignment from the city or town for those state highways where the city or town is the per- mitting authority.The department shall notify the RTPO,MPO, and local governmental entities in writing of the final determina- tion of the reclassification action. (2)Requests for departmental review.A Regional Transporta- tion Planning Organization,Metropolitan Planning Organization, or local governmental entity may request,in writing,at any time that the secretary of transportation initiate a review of the access control classification of a specific segment or segments of a state highway(s).Such written request shall identify the segment(s)of state highway for which the review is requested and shall include a specific recommendation for the reclassification of the highway segment(s)involved.Justification for theaccount the requesteshall d aand be provided in the request taking into criteria in WAC 468-52-040 and 468-52-060.The department will consult with the RTPO,MPO,and local governmental enti- ties involved and shall take into consideration,any comments or concerns received during the review process.The department shall notify the RTPO,MPO,and local governmental entities inrr/� writing of the final determination of the reclassification action. Other interested persons or organizations who wish to initiate a review of the access control classification of a specific highway 15 Attachment D AUK �� Washington State City/Town Access Standards Department of Transportation Status Form Tetructions: If your jurisdiction has adopted the required access permitting standards described in the enclosed ter,please complete Section A. If not,please complete Section B. Please submit the completed form with original signatures no later than November 30, 2007 to: Karena Houser, WSDOT Policy Development& Regional Coordination, PO Box 47370, Olympia, WA, 98504-7370. Thank you! SECTION A CONFIRMING ADOPTION OF REQUIRED ACCESS PERMITTING STANDARDS: I' confirm by my signature below that Name of City Representative City or Town has adopted standards for access permitting on streets designated as state highways in Ordinance adopted Number Month and Day , Year and that these standards meet or exceed the access standards adopted by the Washington State Transportation in Chapters 468-51 and 52 of the Washington Administrative Code(http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac). Signature of City Representative Date Title of City Representative CTION B RETAILING PROGRESS TOWARD ADOPTING REQUIRED STANDARDS: Please briefly describe (1) why your jurisdiction has not yet adopted the required access permitting standards for managed access state highways within city boundaries, (2) where your jurisdiction is in the process of adopting the required standards, and(3) what date you anticipate the required standards will be adopted. • ,'err Last Revised 10/3/2007 p. 1 of 1 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THEY CITY OF DEVELOPMEONT, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, CIT' STANDARDS AND CHAPTER 6, STREET AND UTILITY STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT ACONS)CESS TO PERMITS II)E FOR HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS PURSUANT TO RCW 47.50. WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to provide regulation and control of vehicular access and connection points of ingress to, and egress from, the state highway system within incorporated areas of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-4-080I, Driveway Design Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances City of Renton, Washington," is hereby amended by adding a new subsection, to read as follows: 8. Driveways Providing Access or Connection To and From the State Highway System: Any driveway providing access or connection to or from the state highway system shall be designed and installed pursuant to code section 4-6- 060F.10. SECTION II. Subsection 4-6-060F, Public Street and Sidewalk Design Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances City of Renton, Washington," is hereby amended by adding a new subsection, to read as follows: 10. Vehicular Access and Connection Points To and From the State Highway System: 1 ORDINANCE NO. a. RCW Chapter 47.50 is hereby adopted by reference to provide for the regulation and control of vehicular access and connection points of ingress to and egress from the state highway system within the incorporated areas of the City of Renton. b. Pursuant to the requirements and authority of RCW 47.50, there is hereby adopted by reference the provisions of Chapter 468-51 and Chapter 458-52 of the Washington Administrative Code, together with all future amendments, in order to implement the requirements of Chapter 47.50 RCW. c. At least one copy of each law, rule or regulation adopted hereby is on file with the City Clerk and available for inspection by the public. SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and err► thirty days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1500:9/8/08:scr 3 v CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL 1 At#: -7, 44, Submitting Data: Public Works Department For Agenda of: `iii" Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division October 6, 2008 Staff Contact Peter Hahn, Deputy PW Agenda Status Administrator-Transportation (ext 7242) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Utility Construction Agreement with the Washington Correspondence.. State Department of Transportation Regarding Sewer Ordinance Relocation for the I405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Resolution X Widening Project. Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Issue Paper Study Sessions Utility Construction Agreement Information Resolution Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: (426.000000.018.5950.0035.63.000000.U45450) Expenditure Required... $ 55,750 Transfer/Amendment liaalAmount Budgeted $ 75,000 (2009 budget) Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project, scheduled to begin construction early 2009, will build an additional lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, reconstruct Benson Road South from City Hall south over I-405, widen Talbot Road South between South Renton Village Place and South Puget Drive, and construct a half-interchange at Talbot Road South. The City owns an 18-inch sanitary sewer line that crosses I-405 near Thunder Hills Creek. An existing manhole currently located between Benson Road South and I-405 must be relocated in order to avoid the planned I-405 southbound off-ramp to Talbot Road South. This Utility Construction Agreement establishes that this relocation work will be bid separately within the WSDOT I405 Stage 2 Project and funded by the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Utility Construction Agreement with WSDOT regarding the sewer relocation for the I405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 L( Widening Project. H:\Fle Sys\TRP-Transportation Planning&Programming\TRP-10-Transportation Planning Projects\WSDOT 1.405\S Renton\Stage 2 Widening\Stage 2 Sewer Line Agmnt\Stage 2 Sewer Agenda Bill.doc C�ti�Y �� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ��.. �� MEMORANDUM DATE: October 6, 2008 TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor 1, '�' FROM: � �. Gregg Zimmerm �dministrator STAFF CONTACT: Peter Hahn, Deputy PW Administrator- Transportation (x7242) SUBJECT: Utility Construction Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation Regarding Sewer Relocation for the I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening project. ISSUE: Should the Mayor and City Clerk sign a utility construction agreement between the Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) and the City of Renton regarding the sewer relocation for the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project ? loise RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Utility Construction Agreement with WSDOT regarding the sewer relocation for the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project. BACKGROUND: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project, scheduled to begin construction early 2009, will build an additional lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, reconstruct Benson Road from City Hall south over I-405, widen Talbot Road South between South Renton Village Place and South Puget Drive, and construct a half-interchange at Talbot Road South. The City owns an 18-inch sanitary sewer line the crosses I-405 near Thunder Hills Creek. An existing manhole currently located between Benson Road South and I-405 must be relocated in order to avoid the planned I-405 southbound off-ramp to Talbot Road South. This Utility Construction Agreement establishes that this relocation work will be bid separately within the WSDOT I-405 Stage 2 Project, funded by the City, and constructed by the design-builder within this project. cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PW Administrator—Transportation Dave Christensen,Utility Engineering Supervisor—Utilities Keith Woolley,Transportation Planning and Programming File H\File Sys\TRP-Transportation Planning&Programming\TRP-10-Transportation Planning Projects\WSDOT I-405\S Renton\Stage 2 Widening\Stage 2 Sewer Line Agmnt\Stage 2 Sewer Issue Paper doc ORWashington State Department of Transportation Organization and Address Utility Construction City of Renton '"d Agreement Utility Systems Division Work by State - Actual Cost 1055 South Grady Way Agreement Number State Route Number Renton WA 98057 UT01306 405 Section/Location Control Section Number Region I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 -Widening and SR 515 TI C 174303 Urban Corridors Office Sewer Relocation for Realignment of Benson Road Advance Payment Amount I-405 Milepost 3.07 0 THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this _____—._ day of ,_ , between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation,acting by and through the Secretary of Transportation,by virtue of Title 47 RCW, (hereinafter the"STATE")and the above named organization,(hereinafter the"UTILITY"). ve,and in WHEREAS,the STATE is planning or relocate or construct certain rovement of the ste route as shown UTILITY facilities as set forth in the attached plans,and connection therewith it is necessary to remove and/or WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best public interest for the STATE to include the necessary items of work for relocating and/or constructing the UTILITY'S facilities in the STATE'S construction contract,and TY has a able WHEREAS,bye STATE is being located on easement oron f facilities where the UTILITY owned right-of-way,lthe UTILITY isobligatedto interest reimburselties and the STATE right-of-way virtue of being for any relocation costs required for facilities not on easements or UTILITY owned right-of-way. NOW THEREFORE, in consideratioa part eereon, ITIS terms, mUA conditions, LLY covenants, AS FOLLOWS:s,andperformances contained herein,or attached and incorporated and made , I If a letter of acceptance is not received by the STATE within 90 days following completion of the work,the work will be considered accepted by GENERAL the UTILITY and shall release the STATE from all future claims and Federal-aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A,Subpart A,and amendments demands of any nature resulting from the performance of the work under thereto,determine and establish the definitions and applicable standards this AGREEMENT. for this AGREEMENT and payment hereunder,and by this reference are The UTILITY may withhold this acceptance of work by submitting written incorporated hereby and made a part of this AGREEMENT for all intents roti notificationde the to rthen inasonsco within the he the 90 a y period. This notification shall and purposes as if fully set forth herein. The STATE,as agent acting for an on behalf of the UTILITY,agrees to do II the work in removing,relocating,and/or constructing the UTILITY facilities PAYMENT in accordance and described in the specifications marked Exhibit"A"and An itemized estimate of cost for work to be performed by the STATE plans marked Exhibit"C"attached hereto,and by this reference made a marked Exhibit"B"is attached hereto,and by this reference made a part part of this AGREEMENT. of this AGREEMENT. Plans,specifications,and cost estimates shall be prepared by the STATE The UTILITY,in consideration of the faithful performance of the work to in accordance with the current State of Washington Standard be done by the STATE,agrees to reimburse the STATE for the actual Specifications for Road,Bridge,and Municipal Construction,and direct and related indirect cost of all work which is the financial amendments thereto,and adopted design standards,unless otherwise responsibility of the UTILITY as defined in Exhibits"A"and"B". noted.The STATE will incorporate the plans and specifications into the Partial payments shall be made by the UTILITY,upon request of the STATE'S project and thereafter advertise the resulting project for bid and, are not to be more assuming bids are received and a contract is awarded,administer the STATE,to cover costs incurred.These payments contract. frequent than one(1)per month.It is agreed that any such partial The UTILITY hereby approves the plans and specifications for the payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any described work as shown on Exhibits"A"and C. item and that,at the time of final audit,all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. The UTILITY may,if it desires,furnish an inspector on the project.Any The UTILITY agrees to make payment for the work to be done by the costs for such inspection will be borne solely by the UTILITY.All STATE within thirty(30)days from receipt of billing from the STATE. contact between said inspector and the STATE'S contractor shall The UTILITY agrees to pay the STATE the"Advance Payment Amount" be through the STATE'S representatives. stated above within 20 days after the STATE submits its first partial The UTILITY agrees,upon satisfactory completion of the work involved, payment request to the UTILITY.The advance payment represents approximately fifteen(15)percent of the estimate of cost for which tt to Y of all futurever a letterclaims acceptance which shalltu sult a from the and waiver UTILITY is responsible,and covers costs incurred by the STATE in tAIIIII 0- of all mnthor demands u nd r thisof s AGREEMENT.nature resultingfrom initial stages of the project.The advance payment will be carried performance of the work under throughout the life of the project with final adjustment made in the final payment. DOT Form 224-062 EF Revised 3/00 • ul EXTRA WORK VIII RIGHT OF ENTRY In the event unforeseen conditions require an increase in the UTILITY's The UTILITY hereby grants and conveys to the STATE the right of entry cost obligation of 25 percent or more from that agreed to on Exhibit"B", upon all land which the UTILITY has interest,within the right-of-way of the this AGREEMENT will be modified by supplement AGREEMENT covering highway,for the purpose of improving and/or constructing said highway. '44r,,► said increase. As noted in Exhibit"A"the UTILITY will,after and/or In the event it is determined that any change from the description of work adjustment of their executeand deliverrelocation the STATE a quit contained in this AGREEMENT is required,approval must be secured claim deed removing all UTILITY interests from within the STATE's from the UTILITY prior to the beginning of such work.Where the change right-of-way. is substantial,written approval must be secured. Upon completion of the work outlined herein,all future operation and maintenance of the UTILITY's facilities shall Reimbursement for increased work and/or a substantial change in the UTILITY and without expense to the STATE,be at the sole cost of the description of work shall be limited to costs covered by written modification,change order,or extra work order approved by the UTILITY. IX IV EASEMENT, PERMIT, OR FRANCHISE SALVAGE The STATE will issue the UTILITY an easement,permit,or franchise,as All materials removed bythe STATE shall be reclaimed or disposed of byprovided in Exhibit"A",for those UTILITY facilities which remain on or p cross the STATE's right-of-way following completion of the work outlined the STATE and shall become the property of the STATE.If the UTILITY herein. desires to retain these materials,and the STATE concurs,the UTILITY shall reimburse the STATE an amount not less than that required by the X Federal-aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A,Subpart A. LEGAL RELATIONS VThe UTILITY shall indemnify and hold the STATE and its agents, BETTERMENTS employees,and/or officers harmless from and shall process and defend at its If adjustment of the UTILITY's facilities does constitute a betterment asactions,own exlosses,and ordemands,suits at law or costs of whatsoever kind or penalties, damages, defined in Federal-aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A,Subpart A,the nature,brought against the STATE arising out of,in connection with,or incident to the execution of this AGREEMENT and/or the UTILITY's betterment credit will be included in the estimate of cost. VI performance or failure to perform any aspect of this AGREEMENT. Provided,however,that if such claims are caused by or result from the ACCRUED DEPRECIATION concurrent negligence of(a)the UTILITY and(b)the STATE,its agents, employees,and/or officers, indemnity provision shall be If adjustment of the UTILITY'S facilities does involve a credit due for the enforceable only to the a tentls of the negligence of the UTILITY,valid and accrued depreciation of the facility being replaced,this value will be Provided further,that nothing herein shall require the UTILITY to hold included in the estimate of cost. harmless or defend the STATE,its agents,employees,and/or officers VII from any claims arising from the sole negligence of the STATE,its COMPLIANCE agents,employees,and/or officers. The UTILITY agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of the STATE which shall be in accordance with the Utilities Accommodation Policy,Chapter 468-34 WAC,and amendments thereto,and said policy and amendments are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this AGREEMENT for all intents and purposes as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. UTILITY STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By By— — — Title Title Date DOT Form 224-062 EF Revised 3/00 44116.. UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT UT 01306 *00 WORK BY STATE - ACTUAL COST EXHIBIT "A" SPECIFICATIONS & SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The work proposed under this AGREEMENT provides for the STATE, through its design-build contractor, to design and construct the removal and replacement of an existing 54-inch manhole along with approximately 50 linear feet of 18-inch sewer line located between 1-405 and Benson Road South in order to allow reconstruction of 1-405 and construction of a new interchange at SR 515. The existing sewer line is currently located on limited access STATE highway right of way, City of Renton street right of way, and a UTILITY owned easement on private property. WORK BY THE STATE The STATE through its design-build contractor shall, pursuant to the plans and specifications approved by the UTILITY,furnish the labor, materials, equipment, and tools required to design, permit, remove and replace an existing 54-inch manhole along with approximately 50 linear feet of 18-inch sewer line. A description of the conceptual design, specifications that will be included in the request for proposal, and a plan showing the location of the sanitary sewer line and manhole are described and shown in an excerpt from Section 2.10 Utilities and Relocation Agreements from the STATE's request for proposal for the project marked Exhibit"A,"Attachment"1", RFP Contract Specifications and Exhibit"C", Plans, both of which are attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. The STATE'S design- build contractor will prepare the final plans and specifications as well as construct any modifications necessary to remove and replace the manhole and sanitary sewer line. Any costs incurred by the STATE Tsthe STATE's design-build rapprove, construct, and pectfacitesnecesary to remove and replace the manho e and sanitary sewer line will be borne solely by the UTILITY. WORK BY THE UTILITY The UTILITY shall furnish the labor, materials, equipment, and tools required to review and approve the design of the removal and replacement the existing 54-inch manhole, and inspect the installation of the new facility. Any costs for such work will be borne solely by the UTILITY. SALVAGE The adjustment and/or construction of the UTILITY'S facilities, as required herein, does not include salvage as defined in the Federal Aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A, Subpart A, as the cost to dispose of materials equals the value of any recoverable or reusable materials. BETTERMENT The adjustment and/or rin construction of the UTILITY's Aid Pol cy Guide-23ties, as 645A, SubparetrAn, does not constitute a betterment as defined ACCRUED DEPRECIATION The adjustment and/or construction of the UTILITY'S facilities, as required herein, does not include accrued depreciation as defined in the Federal Aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A, Subpart A. UT 01306 - Exhibit A PAGE 1 of 2 03-25-08 • Now., ACCOUNTING The UTILITY, in consideration of the faithful performance of the work to be done by the STATE agrees to pay the STATE 100 percent of the actual direct and related indirect costs accumulated in accordance with the STATE's work order accounting procedures and Reciprocal Overhead Agreement OH00016 between the STATE and the UTILITY. COST INCREASE REPORTING If the estimated costs exceeds 15% of the amount shown in Exhibit"B", the STATE will report the increase to the UTILITY's Engineer, in writing, immediately with a written explanation for the increase. The UTILITY's Engineer shall have the right to approve payment for these increases and will respond in writing to the STATE of their decision. The UTILITY's Engineer may withhold payment of the additional costs if the STATE does not supply adequate explanation or documentation for the increase or if notification of a covered increase has not been received from the STATE. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY The UTILITY shall be financially responsible and reimburse the STATE for 100 percent of the actual direct and related indirect costs of manhole replacement and associated work required by the STATE's project as shown on Exhibit"A'and summarized in Exhibit"B." RIGHT OF ENTRY The STATE and UTILITY hereby grant a reciprocal and limited right of entry upon all lands in which the STATE and UTILITY have an interest for the sole and specific purpose of performing the 1-405 project and utility relocation work. PERMIT The UTILITY shall obtain a permit from the STATE for relocation work associated with this facility that will be located within the existing 1-405 limited access right of way. tier UT 01306 - Exhibit A PAGE 2 of 2 03-25-08 UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT UT 01306 WORK BY STATE - ACTUAL COST EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHMENT "1" RFP Contract Specifications 2.10.8.4 UTILITY RELOCATION BY DESIGN-BUILDER 2.10.8.4.1 Eighteen-Inch City of Renton Sanitary Sewer Line (UI 245) The City of Renton owns an 18-inch reinforced concrete sanitary sewer line(UI 245)crossing both northbound and southbound lanes of I-405 near the Thunderhills Creek culvert at MP 3.05. The Design-Builder shall design and construct modifications to the sewer line by replacing the existing manhole located east of the northbound lanes of Benson Road associated with Intergovernmental Agreement UT 1306,Utilities Construction Agreement,Work by State Actual Cost,I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 -Widening and SR 515 UC, Sewer Relocation for Realignment of Benson Road,I- 405 Milepost 3.07(Appendix U5). In addition, if it is determined that the sewer line is in conflict with the Design-Builder's design for the Project,the Design-Builder shall work with the City of Renton to design and construct the required permanent Protection in Place. The Design-Builder shall design all modifications to the sewer line so that a minimum flow of 5,200 gpm is provided through the modified sewer system. The type and/or section properties of the sewer line and manhole may be different from the existing sewer line, so long as the minimum flow requirements are met,and the pipe is able to withstand the construction and permanent loads required by the City of Renton. The Design-Builder shall contact the City of Renton to determine the minimum flow requirements through the sewer line during the construction period;peak hourly sewage flows; and City of Renton restrictions affecting available Work windows for modifications to the sewer line. The Design-Builder shall work with the City of Renton during design and construction to assess dead and/or live loads that may exist over or within 25 feet of the sewer line. The Design-Builder shall verify all applicable loading requirements relating to the sewer line with the City of Renton. The Design-Builder shall submit load calculations, shoring and cribbing plans,and pipe protection plans stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed under Title 18 RCW to the City of Renton and to WSDOT for the City of Renton's review and acceptance. The Design-Builder shall not perform any Work within 25 feet of the sewer line,without prior review of all applicable plans and specifications by the City of Renton. The Design-Builder shall provide one manhole access point off the edge of the Project shoulder, and ensure that the manholes are accessible by a standard vacuum truck. No manhole or access points are allowed within the traveled way or shoulder of the Project or the Tukwila to Renton Improvement Project. The marsh le rim and cover f the manhole must comply ust wibe th WSDOT'sn one-foot ertical Utility cevation of ontrol zone adjoining shoulder. The design o guidelines described in WAC 468-34-350. UT 01306 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 1 of 3 06-09-08 slaw The Design-Builder shall submit an existing condition survey and narrative explaining the condition of the soils in the vicinity of the sewer pipe and manhole, and an existing condition survey of the sewer pipe and manhole to the City of Renton and to WSDOT. In order to ensure that the function of the sanitary sewer system is not adversely affected during construction, the Design-Builder shall conduct and submit a report that documents the results of a daily inspection of the sewer pipe to WSDOT for each day the sewer pipe is exposed. The Design-Builder shall submit the submittals listed below for approval to the City of Renton prior to commencing the sewer line Work, except for the testing and As-Built Plans submittals. The review time for the submittals begins when the City of Renton receives the submittal; and the review time ends when the Design-Builder receives a response. The City of Renton will review and return submittals within 14 Calendar Days after it receives the Design-Builder's plans (including any re-submittal of plans)indicating either"approved", "approved with comments", or "not approved, contractor to revise and resubmit". The City of Renton may, if necessary, request an extension of the review period and follow the procedures described in [GCA-5721, Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)and the City of Renton, Cooperative Agreement for Design and Construction of the I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2— Widening and SR 515 Interchange Project]. 2.10.8.4.1.1 Required Submittals • Design drawings and specifications stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed under Title 18 RCW for the City of Renton's review and approval. • Construction and permanent load calculations, shoring and cribbing plans, dewatering plan, and pipe protection plans stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed under Title 18 RCW �rrr for the City of Renton's review and acceptance. • A Sewer Protection Plan, including means and methods, equipment,materials, schematics, sequence,and temporary and permanent loading calculations that meet the City of Renton's requirements, stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed under Title 18 RCW. • A Spill Response Plan to be used if sewage is spilled; the existing sewer pipe leaks; the sewer pipe is damaged, causing the release of sewage; or the sewer pipe is damaged in any other way. • A Sewer and Manhole Relocation Plan, including means and methods, equipment, materials, schematics, sequence,and temporary and permanent loading calculations that meet the City of Renton's requirements, stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed under Title 18 RCW. • Concrete testing reports required by the City of Renton. • Inspection reports, batch tickets, and As-Built Plans for the modified pipe, manhole, and roadway over the top of the pipe. • Quality Management Plan for all Work to modify the City of Renton sewer line. The City of Renton, at its discretion, will provide an inspector or an agent to observe and/or inspect the Work. The City of Renton will not provide directions to the Design-Builder;all formal communications and directions will be done through the WSDOT Engineer. The Design-Builder shall provide City of Renton employees or agents with access to the Project limits to ensure proper compliance with the City of Renton's requirements for City of Renton-owned elements of the ley Project. If the City of Renton determines that all Work within 25 feet of the sewer line is not being UT 01306 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 2 of 3 06-09-08 **0111 performed in accordance with the City of Renton approved plans and specifications,the City of Renton shall notify WSDOT of the non-compliance. WSDOT reserves the right to stop the Work, pending compliance with the City of Renton approved plans and specifications. • UT 01306 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 3 of 3 06-09-08 • UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT UT 01306 WORK BY STATE - ACTUAL COST EXHIBIT "B" FUNDING COMMITMENT Construction of Sewer Line Modifications for Realignment of Benson Road and Construction of Talbot Road Interchange ITEM DESCRIPTION I QUANTITY I UNITS I CUNIT OST I O SAL UI 245 18-inch Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Crosses 1-405 and Proposed Retaining Wall Sanitary Sewer and Manhole Replacement PVC Sanitary Sewer pipe 18 inch in diameter Bank Run Gravel for bedding 50 L.F $ 150.00 $ 7,500.00 Dewatering 20 C.Y $ 20.00 $ 400.00 Flow Diverson 1 LOT $ 2,000.00 Shoring or Extra Excavation Trench 1 L.S. $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 Excavation 210 S.F $ 2.00 $ 420.00 Demolishing existing Manhole 70 C.Y $ 17.00 $ 1,190.00 New 54 inch diameter Manhole 1 EACH $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Manhole extension 1 EACH $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Pipe and Manhole testing 15 L.F $ 300.00 $ 4,500.00 Fall Restraint System 1 LOT $ 500.00 $ 500.00 Compaction 1 L.S $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Mobilization 44 C.Y $ 5.00 $ 220.00 Clean up 1 LOT $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Construction Cost Sub Total 1 LOT $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 38,230.00 Sales Tax(8.9%of Contract) Design Builder Design/Construction Engineering, QA/QC and Administration $ 3,400.00 WSDOT Design/Construction Management $ 4,120.00 Contingency $ 4,200.00 Total Cost $ 3,800.00 I1 1 I $ 55,750.00 TOTAL ESTMATED CITY COST @ 100% TOTAL ESTMATED STATE COST @ 0% $ 55,750.00 $ - owe UT 01306 - Exhibit B PAGE 1 OF 1 03-25-08 UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT UT 01306 WORK BY STATE - ACTUAL COST EXHIBIT "C" Plans •.rr' ,ar UT 01306 - Exhibit C PAGE 1 of 3 03-25-08 • *err' ..- � MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER 6" 4 SEE DRAWING BR29 1 fi (SP PAGE B074) 12" MAX.f 1124 -iiADJUSTMENT (4" MIN.) de I CONE D' RUBBER GASKETED JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-443 STEPS - 3/4" DEFORMED BAR STEPS SHALL BE INCLUDED 6-1/2"-"-1 7' MIN. ...111 CONCRETE RISER BY PIPE INC., OR APPROVED EQUAL. 'A' 12" (TYP) MAX. PIPE SIZE - 'E' LADDER-STD. ALUMINUM OR GALVANIZED STEEL MORTAR FILLETCONCRETE SHELF 1% II PRECAST BASE SECTION ellig OR CAST IN SHELF. ' .AminftL_ 'B' I 6" MIN. (TYP) SANITARY MANHOLE TYPICAL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 'A' I '8' 'C D E 48" MH 48" I 6" MIN. 5"MIN 24" MIN. 21" I.D. 54" MH 54" I 8" MIN. 5.5" MIN. 24" MIN. 24" I.D. 60" MH I 60" I 8" MIN. 6" MIN. 42" MIN. 30" I.D. NOTES 1 STEPS TO BE 3/4' 0 DEFORMED BAR GALVANIZED SAFETY STEPS OR EQUAL. 2. STEPS ARE TO BE IN PLACE BEFORE MANHOLE SECTIONS ARE INSTALLED. 3. CASTING TO BE PER DRAWING BR29 4. MANHOLE SECTIONS TO BE OF REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE. 5. ALL JOINTS SHALL BE GROUTED. 6 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL HAVE ALL INTERIOR SURFACES, INCLUDING CHANNELING. COATED (SEALED) WITH A HIGH SOLIDS URETHANE COATING; WASSER MC—AROSHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL; COLOR OF COATING SHALL BE WHITE 7. RUBBER GASKETED JOINTS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ASTM C-443. 8 CHANNEL HEIGHT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/4 THE INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE LARGEST PIPE, 9 CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLE SHALL BE MADE USING CPK ADAPTOR, KOR—N—SEAL BOOTS OR 'SANITARY MANHOLE APPROVED EQUAL 10 MANHOLES EQUAL TO AND GREATER THAN 20 FEET DEEP SHALL BE A MINIMUM 60" DIAMETER TYPICAL DETAIL AND HAVE A "SURE1RACK" CLIMBING AND FALL PROTECTION SYSTEM INSTALLED ADOPTED »- CITY OF RENTON I +',.,R (IL ) STANDARD PLANS LST DATE 04/04 1 / Re•nsed notes. 1 \ ` Wir 101 7 9G Ad_ --_ I IDH I DUC f—� ed notes Incy AG 34.T_ REVIS!L I _i✓ �' �BY IAPPR'D. V.K. 'y ME :10 1 5P PAGE 80711 UT 01306 - Exhibit C Page 2 of 3 03-25-08 n 1 0 Z S o 0 rc w ^i - LL f W n0 • ,, — 0 Z t_ n� \ 'a' N ,nJ W I� _� JI' .\\ \. .. Q r m LL J ,F '' \ 4 \\, a an 0000 \ v V 's, /•; t:- • ui • -.. - - .it{' Z \1�: `� \ \\ \� ,r( a- [1 `i - lit \ .• .,, \4'',' :':'4'-'1-'. (4,_.,) "4, ,,,,, SEI i,... \ „ I, , a :\ \ ), \\ 1 . I h: I . A j , i p ;1 - (-ri11 II \' 1;!,„,'cv ii if .i \ , 4 I h � 4I 1 • ' f 1' f • l 1it, I- /,/, ,,,'„,:"I',111,'; ' , '' I, d a ky ti ' .. \i' - - IIIi.,,, , . / 1!` II� i 1 ; I ' o ) \\ ' 1 , y ) 11SI , • ,5 " taw' I +. s I \ \ iIi• Y,.1, ,. <Sg/ I I 1 ?'�,J ` \ ''424 Ili' 'r 44\--- ''' ci� 'i ,.,..‘• i' ' ' : i ,I n ( \=rye\.a..",/(4'' 1 .� i;li, � 4 I L, y,a ij iIi• rmI l= ' : t ill \ r\ .-',f ; ryt,-/.. /' „ , ,. e ij t ;(�i ._s &,.',. it 'I 0,, , ' \\` ` i !l I 0 II 1_ ti . 3` i AI, ‘1 �, it II ''/"1. --\ _J 4 fig "i I1I I w` •'',V):^ Iji 1, r1. .1 II •- / \ \ �1 l ! 'I'!_ ' +,▪ 'fl IIII `ir \' 1 , 1, T d,- '( f* '; I dl Ili' Ir „ ii II, t 0I II' f ill 1i i. i;i .,j ! I V I' I 1 'I', ki L-- ' y. I 1� ,l, 0I I'I'' I� i I' 43 fJ' it �! o l' - `—f-- p ,5 J- - -, Q Z 9 #11lek N • uOp,,,..,x4-90C1010-oa,,,,,,,,,9\,yigµ,,,,,,,9o.,919-LS,,u, `31YVH 9HwYMO 40,0111,0.3-.10d-SOV`034ie0 1014 Wd 90.L02.31.1 931,0,.31,0 G.,.GPQW `3WVH 830 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING THE SEWER RELOCATION ELOCT IONNEAR THUNDER HILLS CREEK AS A PART OF THE 1405/1-50TO SR 169 STAGE 2- WIDENING PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2-Widening project, scheduled to begin in early 2009, will build an additional lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, reconstruct Benson Road from City Hall south over I-405 and widen Talbot Road between South Renton Village Place and Puget Drive: and WHEREAS, the City owns an 18" sanitary sewer line that crosses I-405 near Thunder Hills Creek; and WHEREAS, an existing manhole is currently located between Benson Road and I-405 that must be relocated in order to avoid the planned 1-405 southbound off-ramp to Talbot Road; and WHEREAS, the Utility Construction Agreement establishes that this relocation work will be bid separately within the WSDOT Stage 2 project, funded by the City and constructed by the design-builder within this project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. Imo 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Utility Construction Agreement with WSDOT for the purpose of extending the City fiber network south of I-403. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2008. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2008. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: *420+ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1373:9/17/08:scr 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Public Works Department Dept/Div/Board. Transportation Systems Division For Agenda of: Staff Contact... Peter Hahn, Deputy PW October 6, 2008 Agenda Status Administrator-Transportation (ext. 7242) Subject: Consent X Pubic Hearing.. Utility Construction Agreement with the Washington orrespond n e.. State Department of Transportation Regarding Fiber Ordinance Optic Conduit in the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Resolution Widenin_ Pro'ect. X Exhibits: Old Business Issue Paper New Business X Utility Construction Agreement Study Sessions Resolution Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: n/a Expenditure Required... $ 292,070 Amount Budgeted $ 292,070 (2009-2011) Transfer/Amendment Total Pro'ect Bud:et Revenue Generated tbd Ci Share Total Pro'ect.. SCARY OF ACTION: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Widening Project, scheduled to begin construction early2009, will buildd an additional lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, reconstruct Benson Road'South from City Hall south over I-405 and widen Talbot Road South between South Renton Village Place and South Puget Drive. The Information Services Division and the Transportation Systems Division require conduit to extend the City fiber optic network south of I-405. This Utility Construction Agreement establishes that this conduit work will be bid separately within the WSDOT Stage 2 project and funded by the City. Upon establishing the actual project cost through the design-build process, an appropriation will be requested from Council in the future through a separate Council action. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Utility Construction Agreement with WSDOT regarding the inclusion of City fiber optic conduit in the RFP for the 1-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project. H:\File Sys\TRP-Transportation Planning&Programming\TRP-10-Transportation Planning Projects WSDOT I-405\S Renton Stage 2 Widening\Stage 2 Conduit Agmnt\Stage 2 Conduit Agenda Bill.doc 6tiP �� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: October 6, 2008 TO: Marcie Palmer, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: -�� Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Gregg ZimmermaiA'dministrator STAFF CONTACT: Peter Hahn, Deputy PW Administrator- Transportation (x7242) SUBJECT: Utility Construction Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation Regarding Fiber Optic Conduit in the I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project. ISSUE: Should the Mayor and City Clerk sign a utility construction agreement between the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the City of Renton regarding fiber optic conduit in the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project ? RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Utility Construction Agreement with WSDOT regarding fiber optic conduit in the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project. BACKGROUND: The Washington State Depai tinent of Transportation (WSDOT) I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 Widening Project, scheduled to begin construction early 2009, will build an additional lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, reconstruct Benson Road from City Hall south over I-405 and widen Talbot Road South between South Renton Village Place and South Puget Drive. WSDOT intends to execute this project using the design-build method of project delivery. The Information Systems Division and the Transportation Systems Division require conduit to extend the City fiber network south of I-405. Cost and construction efficiencies will be realized by including this work with the WSDOT I-405 Stage 2 Project, since this project will build a new Benson Road bridge and will reconstruct a significant portion of Talbot Road Marci Palmer,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 October 6,2008 South. This Utility Construction Agreement establishes that this conduit work will be bid separately within the WSDOT I-405 Stage 2 Project and will be funded by the City. Upon establishing the actual project cost through the design-build process, an appropriation will be requested from Council in the future through a separate Council action. cc: Iwen Wang Finance/IS Administrator Peter Hahn,Deputy PW Administrator—Transportation Jim Seitz,Transportation Planning and Programming Supervisor Keith Woolley,Transportation Planning and Programming George McBride,Information Systems Contractor Ron Hansen,Network Systems Supervisor File Nour H:\File Sys\TRP-Transportation Planning&Programming\TRP-10-Transportation Planning Projects\WSDOT I-40515 Renton\Stage 2 Widening\Stage 2 Conduit Agmnt\Stage 2 Conduit Issue Paper.doc 11/71 Washington State 1I/ Department of Transportation Organization and Address Utility Construction City of Renton Agreement Information Systems Division Work by State - Actual Cost 1055 South Grady Way Agreement Number State Route Number Renton WA 98057 UT01312 405 ------ - Section/Location Control Section Number Region I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR 5151/C 174303 Urban Corridors Office Fiber Optic Line Modifications and Additions Associated Advance Payment Amount with Realignment of Benson Road I-405 Milepost 3.12 0 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, acting by and through the Secretary of Transportation, by virtue of Title 47 RCW, (hereinafter the"STATE")and the above named organization,(hereinafter the"UTILITY"). WHEREAS,the STATE is planning the construction or improvement of the state route as shown above,and in connection therewith it is necessary to remove and/or relocate or construct certain UTILITY facilities as set forth in the attached plans,and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best public interest for the STATE to include the necessary items of work for relocating and/or constructing the UTILITY's facilities in the STATE's construction contract,and WHEREAS,the STATE is obligated for the relocation of facilities where the UTILITY has a compensable interest in its facilities and right-of-way by virtue of being located on easements or UTILITY owned right-of-way,the UTILITY is obligated to reimburse the STATE for any relocation costs required for facilities not on easements or UTILITY owned right-of-way. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms,conditions,covenants,and performances contained herein,or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: learre If a letter of acceptance is not received by the STATE within 90 days GENERAL following completion of the work,the work will be considered accepted by the UTILITY and shall release the STATE from all future claims and Federal-aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A,Subpart A,and amendments demands of any nature resulting from the performance of the work under thereto,determine and establish the definitions and applicable standards this AGREEMENT. for this AGREEMENT and payment hereunder,and by this reference are The UTILITY may withhold this acceptance of work by submitting written incorporated hereby and made a part of this AGREEMENT for all intents notification to the STATE within the 90 day period.This notification shall and purposes as if fully set forth herein. include the reasons for withholding the acceptance. The STATE,as agent acting for an on behalf of the UTILITY,agrees to do 11 the work in removing,relocating,and/or constructing the UTILITY facilities PAYMENT in accordance and described in the specifications marked Exhibit"A"and plans marked Exhibit"C"attached hereto,and by this reference made a An itemized estimate of cost for work to be performed by the STATE part of this AGREEMENT. marked Exhibit"B"is attached hereto,and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. Plans,specifications,and cost estimates shall be prepared by the STATE in accordance with the current State of Washington Standard The UTILITY,in consideration of the faithful performance of the work to Specifications for Road,Bridge,and Municipal Construction,and be done by the STATE,agrees to reimburse the STATE for the actual direct and related indirect cost of all work which is the amendments thereto,and adopted design standards,unless otherwise financial noted.The STATE will incorporate the plans and specifications into the responsibility of the UTILITY as defined in Exhibits"A"and"B". STATE's project and thereafter advertise the resulting project for bid and, Partial payments shall be made by the UTILITY,upon request of the assuming bids are received and a contract is awarded,administer the STATE,to cover costs incurred.These payments are not to be more contract. The UTILITY hereby approves the plans and specifications for the frequent than one(1)per month.It is agreed that any such partial payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any described work as shown on Exhibits"A"and"C". item and that,at the time of final audit,all required adjustments will be The UTILITY may,if it desires,furnish an inspector on the project.Any made and reflected in a final payment. costs for such inspection will be borne solely by the UTILITY.All The UTILITY agrees to make payment for the work to be done by the contact between said inspector and the STATE's contractor shall STATE within thirty(30)days from receipt of billing from the STATE. be through the STATE's representatives. The UTILITY agrees to pay the STATE the"Advance Payment Amount" stated above within 20 days after the STATE submits its first partial The UTILITY agrees,upon satisfactory completion of the work involved, payment request to the UTILITY.The advance payment represents to deliver a letter of acceptance which shall include a release and waiver approximately fifteen(15)percent of the estimate of cost for which the of all future claims or demands of any nature resulting from the UTILITY is responsible,and covers costs incurred by the STATE in the performance of the work under this AGREEMENT. initial stages of the project.The advance payment will be carried throughout the life of the project with final adjustment made in the final payment. DOT Form 224-062 EF Revised 3/00 III VIII EXTRA WORK RIGHT OF ENTRY In the event unforeseen conditions require an increase in the UTILITY's The UTILITY hereby grants and conveys to the STATE the right of entry cost obligation of 25 percent or more from that agreed to on Exhibit"B", upon all land which the UTILITY has interest,within the right-of-way of'' this AGREEMENT will be modified by supplement AGREEMENT covering highway,for the purpose of improving and/or constructing said highw< said increase. As noted in Exhibit"A"the UTILITY will,after relocation and/or In the event it is determined that any change from the description of work adjustment of their facilities,execute and deliver to the STATE a quit contained in this AGREEMENT is required,approval must be secured daim deed removing all UTILITY interests from within the STATE's from the UTILITY prior to the beginning of such work.Where the change right-of-way. is substantial,written approval must be secured. Upon completion of the work outlined herein,all future operation and maintenance of the UTILITY's facilities shall be at the sole cost of the Reimbursement for increased work and/or a substantial change in the UTILITY and without expense to the STATE. description of work shall be limited to costs covered by written IX modification,change order,or extra work order approved by the UTILITY. EASEMENT, PERMIT, OR FRANCHISE IV The STATE will issue the UTILITY an easement,permit,or franchise,as SALVAGE provided in Exhibit"A",for those UTILITY facilities which remain on or All materials removed by the STATE shall be reclaimed or disposed of by cross the STATE's right-of-way following completion of the work outlined the STATE and shall become the property of the STATE.If the UTILITY herein. desires to retain these materials,and the STATE concurs,the UTILITY X shall reimburse the STATE an amount not less than that required by the Federal-aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A,Subpart A. LEGAL RELATIONS V The UTILITY shall indemnify and hold the STATE and its agents, employees,and/or officers harmless from and shall process and defend BETTERMENTS at its own expense any and all claims,demands,suits at law or equity, If adjustment of the UTILITY's facilities does constitute a betterment as actions,penalties,losses,damages,or costs,of whatsoever kind or defined in Federal-aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A,Subpart A,the nature,brought against the STATE arising out of,in connection with,or betterment credit will be included in the estimate of cost. incident to the execution of this AGREEMENT and/or the UTILITY's performance or failure to perform any aspect of this AGREEMENT. VI Provided,however,that if such claims are caused by or result from the ACCRUED DEPRECIATION concurrent negligence of(a)the UTILITY and(b)the STATE,its agents, employees,and/or officers,this indemnity provision shall be valid and If adjustment of the UTILITY'S facilities does involve a credit due for the enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the UTILITY,and accrued depreciation of the facility being replaced,this value will be Provided further,that nothing herein shall require the UTILITY to hold included in the estimate of cost. harmless or defend the STATE,its agents,employees,and/or officers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of the STATE,its VII agents,employees,and/or officers. COMPLIANCE The UTILITY agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of the STATE which shall be in accordance with the Utilities Accommodation Policy,Chapter 468-34 WAC,and amendments thereto,and said policy and amendments are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this AGREEMENT for all intents and purposes as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. UTILITY STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By By Title Title Date DOT Form 224-062 EF Revised 3/00 %No' UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT UT 01312 WORK BY STATE - ACTUAL COST EXHIBIT "A" SPECIFICATIONS & SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The work proposed under this AGREEMENT provides for the STATE, through its design-build contractor, to design, permit, and construct 1)two new 4-inch fiber optic conduits with inner ducts and related manholes and hand holes on the west side of Benson Road South, and 2)two new 4-inch fiber optic conduits and related manholes and hand holes on the west side of SR 515(Talbot Road South). This work will be undertaken in order to 1)widen 1-405 and construct a new interchange at SR 515 and 2)construct infrastructure elements of the City of Renton Metropolitan Fiber Optic Network that are located within WSDOT's project limits. The existing fiber optic line is currently located on limited access STATE highway right of way and City of Renton street right of way. WORK BY THE STATE The STATE through its design-build contractor shall, pursuant to the plans and specifications approved by the UTILITY,furnish the labor, materials, equipment, and tools required to design, permit, and construct the following City of Renton communication and conduit systems: • Two 80 PVC schedule 4-inch conduits with innerducts in the west side of SR 515 from an aerial location in the southwest quadrant of the South Puget Drive intersection to the northwest quadrant of the South Renton Village Place intersection; and • Two 80 PVC schedule 4-inch conduits with innerducts in the west side of Benson Road South ,keiw from STA BRS 15+00 to STA BRS 42+00. The design will include installation of a type 7 dual-lid junction box every 500 feet, extending to 24-inch depth, and installation of a 25-TA vault every 2,500 feet. One 25-TA vault will be placed in close proximity to a new CCTV controller cabinet located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of SR 515 and South Renton Village Place and connected to the cable vault at the new CCTV cabinet with 2-inch conduit. Traffic rated lids will be used. Junction boxes will be located at intersections where possible.The fiber optic conduits with innerducts will be connected to existing city junction boxes, if present, especially at intersections. Pull tape will be installed with integrated location wire. The conduits will be installed in a common communication trench or in the traffic telemetry trench, if possible.. A description of the conceptual design, specifications that will be included in the request for proposal, and a plan showing the location of the fiber optic conduits are described and shown in an excerpt from Section 2.10 Utilities and Relocation Agreements and Section 2.18 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)(provided for information only)from the STATE's request for proposal for the project marked Exhibit"A,"Attachment"1", Draft RFP Contract Specifications and Exhibit"C", 1-405 City of Renton Proposed Buried Fiber Exhibit, both of which are attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. The STATE's design- build contractor will prepare the final plans and specifications as well as construct the new fiber optic conduits on Benson Road South and SR 515. Any costs incurred by the STATE and the STATE's design-build contractor to design, review, approve, construct, and inspect the fiber optic conduits will be borne solely by the UTILITY. WORK BY THE UTILITY The UTILITY shall furnish the labor, materials, equipment, and tools required to review and approve the �✓ design of the new fiber optic conduits, and inspect the installation of the new facilities. UT 01312 - Exhibit A PAGE 1 of 2 05-21-08 Any costs for such work will be borne solely by the UTILITY. SALVAGE The adjustment and/or construction of the UTILITY's facilities, as required herein, does not include salvage as defined in the Federal Aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A, Subpart A, as the cost to dispose of materials equals the value of any recoverable or reusable materials. BETTERMENT The adjustment and/or construction of the UTILITY's facilities, as required herein, does not constitute a betterment as defined in the Federal Aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A, Subpart A. ACCRUED DEPRECIATION The adjustment and/or construction of the UTILITY's facilities, as required herein, does not include accrued depreciation as defined in the Federal Aid Policy Guide-23 CFR 645A, Subpart A. ACCOUNTING The UTILITY, in consideration of the faithful performance of the work to be done by the STATE, agrees to pay the STATE 100 percent of the actual direct and related indirect costs accumulated in accordance with the STATE's work order accounting procedures and Reciprocal Overhead Agreement OH00016 between the STATE and the UTILITY. COST INCREASE REPORTING If the estimated costs exceeds 15% of the amount shown in Exhibit"B", the STATE will report the increase to the UTILITY's Engineer, in writing, immediately with a written explanation for the increase. The UTILITY's Engineer shall have the right to approve payment for these increases and will respond in writing to the STATE of their decision. The UTILITY's Engineer may withhold payment of the additional costs if the STATE does not supply adequate explanation or documentation for the increase or if notification of a covered increase has not been received from the STATE. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY The UTILITY shall be financially responsible and reimburse the STATE for 100 percent of the actual direct and related indirect costs of fiber optic conduit work included in the STATE's project as shown on Exhibit"A'and summarized in Exhibit"B." RIGHT OF ENTRY The STATE and UTILITY hereby grant a reciprocal and limited right of entry upon all lands in which the STATE and UTILITY have an interest for the sole and specific purpose of performing the 1-405 project and utility relocation work. PERMIT The UTILITY shall obtain a permit from the STATE for relocation work associated with this facility that will be located within the existing 1-405 limited access right of way. UT 01312 - Exhibit A PAGE 2 of 2 05-21-08 UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT UT 01312 WORK BY STATE - ACTUAL COST EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHMENT "1" Draft RFP Contract Specifications 2.10 UTILITIES AND RELOCATION AGREEMENTS 2.10.8.4.3 City of Renton Fiber Optic Cable Line (UI 409), NewCity of Renton Fiber Optic Cable Conduit - Benson Road, and%New City of Renton Fiber Optic Cable Conduit - SR 515 (Talbot`Road)` The City of Renton owns a fiber optic line(UI 409) consistin" oftyGo 3-inch PVC conduits and related manholes and hand holes that connect the City of Renton`s traffic management center to a WSDOT closed circuit television communication hub atMP 3.14. WSDOT and the City of Renton have also agreed to construct two new 4-inch fiber optic conduits with inner ducts on the west side of Benson Road South, and two new 4-inch`fiber optic conduits on the west side of SR %ow 515. // The Design-Builder shall design and construct;.Work associated with UT-01312, Utility Construction Agreement, Work by StateActual Cost, I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR 515 UC, Fiber Optic Line Modifications and Additions Associated with Realignment of Benson Road, I-405,,Milepost 3.12. Refer to and Section 2.13 and Section 2.18 for design, installation and submittal requirements for the fiber optic line relocation and new fiber optic conduits. 2.18 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) 2.18.1 G NERAL The Design-Builder shall conduct all Work necessary to meet the requirements for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) in accordance with this RFP, and shall keep the existing ITS functioning throughout construction of the Project. This Section discusses ITS standards and publications, performance requirements, design and construction criteria, maintenance during construction, and submittal requirements. The Design-Builder shall maintain electrical power to all ITS devices during construction. The Design-Builder shall maintain communications between all ITS devices and the Traffic Systems 441..- Management Centers (TSMC) during construction. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 1 of 34 5-21-08 Nist The Design-Builder shall design, furnish, and install complete ITS which have been accepted by WSDOT including,but not limited to, the following elements: • Fiber optic main trunk line cable and distribution cables plus twisted-wire pair cable as required; • Five Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras; • Two Variable Message Signs (VMSs); • Two ramp meters/data station; • One data station; • All cabinets, controllers, software, loops,junction boxes, and any ancillary equipment required to create a functioning ITS; • Two 80 PVC schedule 4-inch conduits with innerducts in the westIgi e:of Talbot Road South from the aerial location in the southwest quadrant of the,ttpetDrive intersection to the northwest quadrant of the Renton Village intersection; • Two 80 PVC schedule 4-inch conduits with innerducts,in<tliewest side of Benson Road South from project limit to project limit; '4" • System and equipment testing as required; and >" • Foundations,property restoration, and incidental Work. 2.18.1.1 FORWARD COMPATIBILITY ` . The Design-Builder shall design the follovy'mg:ITS elements to be Forward Compatible in accordance with Section 2.1: z4s4, • The east VMS structure foundation and anchor bolts at approximately northbound STA 1239+40 shall be designed to accommodate a sign bridge for a Forward Compatible span length of up to 120 feet 2.18.1.2 MAINTENANS REQUIREMENTS All ITS devices shall be designed and constructed so that they are accessible and maintainable using current maintenance methods and materials. Refer to Section 2.11 for additional requirements.A„ 2.18.1.3 ;.` ,INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 2.181:4 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 2.18"3 ' MANDATORY STANDARDS The following is a list of publications that shall be used for all design and construction. They are listed in hierarchical order, with the most important appearing at the top of the list. This is not a comprehensive list; other applicable publications may be required to complete the design and construction. If the Design-Builder becomes aware of any ambiguities and/or conflicts relating New UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 2 of 34 5-21-08 44••w in any way to the Mandatory Standards, the Design-Builder shall notify WSDOT immediately, so that WSDOT may resolve them. • Special Provisions (Appendix B2). • Amendments to the Standard Specifications (Appendix B1). • Standard Specifications (M41-10) (Appendix D18). • WSDOT Design Manual(M22-01) (DM) (Appendix D3). • Standard Plans (M21-01) (Appendix D17). • WSDOT Traffic Manual(M51-02) (Appendix DI9). • Washington State Modifications to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (M24- 01) (MUTCD). • WSDOT Materials Manual(M46-01) (Appendix D10). • WSDOT Construction Manual(M41-01) (Appendix D2), • 1-405 Urban Design Criteria, Y ,007 (Appendix L2).,,,," // • WSDOT Northwest Region Electrical Details. 07'4, % • WSDOT Northwest Region ITS Design Guide (Appendix II). • WSDOT Northwest Region ITS Design Guide`Supplement(Appendix I4). %110. • WSDOT Northwest Region ITS DetailL 1Appendix 12). • ICC Supplement to the International'Code, 2007. • ICC International Building Code'(WC), 2006. • National Fire Protection Association National Electrical Code (NFPA,NEC), 2005. • AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition, 2004. • AASHTO Standagdi pecif cations for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries, and Traffic Signals, 4th Edition, 2001, with 2002, 2003, and 2006 Interims. • FHWA Manual ion Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD), 2003. • AASHTO-Roadside Design Guide, 3rd Edition, 2002, and 2006 Chapter 6 Update. • US DOT National ITS Architecture. • LIA/TIA Fiber Optic Test Procedure (FOTP)Standards. • "`USDA United States Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Specifications and Drawings. 2.18.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 2.18.3.1 ITS DESIGN PROGRESS MEETINGS k""` Refer to Section 2.16. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 3 of 34 5-21-08 2.18.3.2 TESTING OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT To ensure that all existing equipment is in proper working order at a Project site where the Design-Builder will perform Work, the Design-Builder may request a meeting at each Project site with WSDOT and the agency with current maintenance responsibility,prior to the performance of any Work at the Project site. At the time of this meeting, all loops, cabling, connectors, and cabinet operations may be tested by the Design-Builder. The Design-Builder shall be responsible for requesting, coordinating, and conducting the on-site meeting, and,for;;, providing all labor,materials,test equipment, and test documentation. All testing shall Scriori- destructive. If the Design-Builder begins Work at a Project site without arranging tl? s"fSre-' testing, WSDOT will assume that all cabinet components and operations were in roo`er working order prior to the performance of any Work, and the Design-Builder shall be responsible for y: ensuring that all cabinet components and operations are in proper working order°bn the completion of the Work. If no pre-testing is completed, any equipment tb t i not functioning upon the completion of the Work will be assumed to have been in pre vtpriCing order as of the date of Notice to Proceed, and shall be replaced at the Design-Buildet's�0xpense. 2.18.3.3 ITS TESTING 1, ?i The Design-Builder shall follow all testing requirements uTacEordance with the Special Provisions. 4, ';, The Design-Builder shall coordinate ITS testing with he WSDOT Engineer and with the Signal Branch Office. Prior to any testing, the Design-Builder shall provide 30 Calendar Days notice to the WSDOT Engineer and to the Signal BrandhOffice. The WSDOT Signal Branch Office may be contacted at the following address: 3700 - 9th Avenue South' ''' Seattle, Washington498134 Telephone: (206) 442.2110 The Design-Builder shall. `ave cu ent training and certification on all testing equipment used. The Design-Builder sh6victe documentary evidence that the instruments used for testing have been calibrated in ac64rdance with the instrument manufacturer's specifications within the last 12 months. The Design-Builder shall have all testing equipment calibrated annually for the duration of the Contract. Measurements recorded during the tests shall be supplied to WSDOT. The Design-Builder shall have in its possession a certification of test device calibration in accordancfwith the American National Standards Institute(ANSI) guidelines. The testing device,shall`measure electrical and insulation characteristics of power and signal control cables, and calibration documentation of optical cable test equipment. ANSI guidelines call for annual cafbation of test equipment. Depending on the construction schedule, highway ITS components may be installed,made operational, and relocated at a later time. Highway ITS components shall undergo all series of tests when relocated. The Design-Builder shall provide a schedule for all testing so that WSDOT may observe the testing. Times and locations for all tests shall be provided to WSDOT a minimum of seven Calendar Days in advance of any test. — UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 4 of 34 5-21-08 The Design-Builder shall develop all ITS testing procedures and pass/fail requirements. Testing procedures and requirements must be accepted by WSDOT prior to any testing. WSDOT may observe any tests and will audit test results. 2.18.3.3.1 Fiber Optic Splicing and Testing Plan The Design-Builder shall submit a Fiber Optic Splicing and Testing Plan prior to beginning work on the ITS. The Fiber Optic Splicing and Testing Plan shall be in Word format and shall include the following: • Location of all proposed fiber optic splices, including what is being spliced; "`<; ',. • Location of all temporary fiber optic splices; • Schedule date of splices and testing; • Tests to be performed; "-ry • Equipment to be used for the testing; • Calibration results of testing equipment; and - • List of Project contacts (including phone numbers) for%tpe Design-Builder and WSDOT staff. The Fiber Optic Splicing and Testing Plan shall be subnitted in Word format, with each final plan submittal that includes ITS Work. The Fiber Optic Splicing and Testing Plan shall be kowr updated as necessary with each design change,affectng testing type and location. Upon completion of the splicing and testing of ITS equipment, the Design-Builder shall submit Project documentation and fiber optic test documentation, in accordance with this Section and Appendix B2. 2.18.3.3.2 Power and Control Cable Testing The Design-Builder shall test°power and control cables according to the requirements of Section 8-20 of the Standard Specifications, and the applicable sections of the Special Provisions. 2.18.3.4 COORDINATION WITH ADJOINING PROJECTS The Design-Builder shall obtain the ITS design plans for any adjacent projects, and determine the coordination>requirements for continuous functioning of the ITS equipment for the Project. The Desi Builder shall the designand construction schedule accordingly to coordinate -,.. adjust g Y the installation of the required components, while continuously maintaining the ITS. Refer to Seeton;2.1. 2.18.3:5 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF ITS COMPONENTS The Design-Builder shall provide maintenance of all existing and new highway ITS components that the Design-Builder furnished and installed as part of the Project, until Physical Completion or unless otherwise noted. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 5 of 34 5-21-08 Maintenance and operation includes the response to faults. The three categories of faults -- urgent, priority, and minor-- are described as follows: • Urgent—Any fault that causes a total failure, disruption, safety impact, or system-wide disruption of the following equipment or services: • Communications links and equipment; and • Ramp metering facility or CCTV facility. The response time for urgent faults of ITS components shall be less than two hours. Therepair time for urgent faults of ITS components shall be less than four hours. vh; • Priority—Any fault that causes a failure or disruption of an operator workstaon, local control unit for VMS, or the VMS itself. The response time shall be not:43%41e following day. The repair time shall be less than four hours. • Minor—Any other fault. The response time shall be midnight the;next Calendar Day. The repair time shall be less than four hours. y� The Design-Builder shall provide a plan for maintenance and oji. , trbn of existing and new ITS components within the Project limits furnished and installed b6, hel5esign-Builder. The plan shall include, at a minimum, the following: °%/ • Details of the proposed preventive maintenance-program including frequency, for each highway ITS component. • A general description of the proposed emergeficy maintenance and operation response `err program, for each highway ITS componett. This description shall include the categories of faults and how the faults will:be'deteeted. • Maintenance and operation activities. Upon execution of the Contract, the Design-Builder shall be responsible for all highway ITS and communications components that:the Design-Builder performs Work on, including those components already in place. `The Design-Builder shall maintain the components through the warranty period as descrfb(d in the Special Provisions. The Design-Builder shall replace, not repair, hardware or equipment if any of the following occurs: • The D,,esign-Builder has attempted to repair the hardware or equipment on at least one / pre oils occasion and there has been a subsequent failure; • -`--Tre repair activities interfere with the movement of traffic; or • WSDOT decides that replacement is necessary in the interest of public safety. The Design-Builder shall maintain a log documenting maintenance activities and all repairs performed on ITS equipment. The maintenance log shall be made available to WSDOT upon request. 2.18.3.6 ITS TRAINING The Design-Builder is not required to provide training to WSDOT for the Project. Nor UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 6 of 34 5-21-08 '41irse 2.18.3.7 WSDOT PERSONNEL The Design-Builder shall coordinate the Work with WSDOT personnel and the 1-405 Project office, as required. The Design-Builder shall coordinate ITS Work with the following WSDOT staff: 2.18.3.7.1 ITS Implementation Engineer The WSDOT ITS Implementation Engineer will perform the following: • Recommend acceptance of components and/or methods to WSDOT; • Review the certification of test device calibration (to ANSI specified guidelines), • Review and make recommendations for acceptance to WSDOT of the required documentation including specifications, shop drawings, and all measured and recorded values for the system and for each cabinet; • Review and accept splice vault, CCTV, cabinet, and communication hub locations once surveyed and staked in the field; , • Oversee connections to the existing ITS communicaticOetwork; • Review plans and component submittal packages AiidIssist the design team; and • Make recommendations to WSDOT for the actejitance of ITS components based on the submittal and other documentation packages.:: %or 2.18.3.7.2 Electrical Inspector The WSDOT Regional Electrical Engineer will designate a WSDOT Electrical Inspector. The Design-Builder shall contact WSDOT to aiTange for electrical inspection. The Department of Labor and Industries has authority over all electrical installations within the State of Washington. WSDOThas been granted authority over all electrical installations within the rights of way of State%highivah,provided WSDOT maintains and enforces an equal,higher, or better standard of corittiction,materials, devices, appliances, and equipment than is required by State law. It is the role df the WSDOT Electrical Inspector to assure that all electrical installations meet the requirements of the National Electric Code, and all applicable State laws and provision :S.,.: The WSDCTE1Cctrical Inspector will perform the following: • Act aa resource for the ITS design team; • Assist with ITS plan reviews; • 4:1)erform periodic inspections during construction; • Witness required ITS field tests (as desired); and • Inspect and approve all electrical and ITS installations in accordance with this RFP. UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 7 of 34 5-21-08 2.18.3.7.3 Northwest Region Signal Maintenance Superintendent The Northwest Region Signal Maintenance Superintendent may be contacted at the following address: 3700 - 9th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98134 Telephone: (206)442-2110 The Northwest Region Signal Maintenance Superintendent, or designee, supervises the`'',,, maintenance of all existing WSDOT signal,illumination, and ITS facilities within the-rights of way of State highways, and performs the following: • Accepts salvaged ITS materials; and • Performs oversight inspection of all ITS facilities installed by the Design-Builder prior to Project completion(before these ITS facilities are turned over to tI{e State to maintain). 2.18.4 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS •�" 2.18.4.1 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS r' The ITS shall provide for fiber optic communications, reai-tme National Television System Committee CCTV surveillance, data collection,VMS,'ranip"metering, Highway Advisory Radio (HAR), and all associated traffic control devices. .,,...''>:;; The Design-Builder shall provide a complete 9 perat'onal, and maintainable ITS and `'r+' components. The ITS and its components shalpbe compatible with the existing system. The Design-Builder shall furnish, install, and maintain all electrical power service and communications necessary for the ITS. `I'lie``Design-Builder shall label all new and existing ITS devices using naming and numbering conventions provided by WSDOT (see Appendix I). The Design-Builder shall provide an ITS that meets the following requirements: • Expandability, Ae • Cabinet layouts ir'a%ccordance with Appendices I and I2; • Documentation,reflecting the National ITS Architecture; • Supportfor stand-alone operation of all field devices using backup software components; • Protectcn:;from voltage surges and lightning; • Weather-resistant components capable of operating in rain, snow, and wind conditions, aad'in temperature and humidity ranges encountered in the Project area; • >:'Hazard-free ITS components mounted along the side of the road outside of the clear zone, or in protected areas; • If ITS components are mounted in the clear zone, they shall be constructed and protected in accordance with the requirements in the AASHTO Roadside Design Guide; and • Field cabinets with standard WSDOT locking devices. NINO UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 8 of 34 5-21-08 The Design-Builder shall use stainless steel mounting hardware such as bolts, nuts, washers, and external hinges on vaults, cabinets, shelters,junction boxes, and other outdoor ITS devices. The Design-Builder shall use only components designed for ten or more years of industrial use. All material, equipment, and components furnished by the Design-Builder shall be new (within 12 months from the date of manufacture), of the latest design and manufacture, in an operable condition at the time of delivery and installation, and compatible with the existing system. The Design-Builder shall not mount ITS equipment on sign structures, with the exception.of the VMS and HAR. The Design-Builder shall install the cabinets so that they are easily accessible to,.mairitenannce personnel from the roadway(see Section 2.11), and so that they maximize safety forythe maintenance personnel, where possible. The Design-Builder shall also install the,cabinets so that maintenance personnel can park their vehicles and have access to CCTV poles and VMS (see Section 2.11). When possible, the Design-Builder shall locate the ITS elem.ehts so that the need for future relocation is eliminated. The Design-Builder shall construct access for maintenance vehi les'a,'approximately the s following locations and any other locations where CCTV or V § systems are installed: • CCTV northbound 1-405 STA 1209+60; • CCTV northbound I-405 STA 1228+80; • • CCTV southbound I-405 STA 1245+00; • VMS northbound I-405 STA 1239+40%2d' • VMS southbound 1-405 STA 12553+20 (maintenance access shall be at left shoulder). The Design-Builder shall design and,.:constiuct a temporary ITS system thakprovides for continuous operation of all existingl1TS components during construction. The finish coat for all ITS cabinets shall be powder coated in accordance with manufacturers recommendations. The finish`coat color shall be cascade green as specified in the 1-405 Urban Design Criteria. The finish coat for all ITS poles shall be painted or powder coated in accordance with the Special Provisions. The finish coat color shall be cascade green as specified in the 1-405 Urban Design Criteria. 2.18.4.1.1 : ,"Vehicle Detection TheD'esign-Builder shall provide permanent vehicle detection which measures, at a minimum, vebicu1r volume and lane occupancy on the highway. The Design-Builder shall place perp lent mainline detection with speed detection at '/Z-mile nominal spacing. The Design- Builder shall place permanent detection in all ramps, all auxiliary lanes, and all mainline lanes. The Design-Builder shall not exceed the maximum loop lead-in length of 500 feet. Any increase shall require WSDOT acceptance. Data stations shall have mainline speed loops and volume detection for all on-ramps and off-ramps within the Project limits. Ramp meters shall have all loops required for data stations, plus loops required for the ramp meters. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 9 of 34 5-21-08 The Design-Builder shall maintain and re-establish operation of all loops outside the Project limits if they lead to a new controller within the Project limits. The Design-Builder shall include a maximum of 32 detector inputs per cabinet. Where existing loops will be reused and routed into a new data station or ramp meter cabinet,the Design-Builder shall ensure that all existing loops are connected to the new cabinet location. To achieve this, the Design-Builder shall comply with this RFP and the following requirements: • No splices will be allowed in the loop lead-ins (2c(s)wires); if necessary, the Design- Builder shall replace the lead-in wires. • The lead-in wires shall be contained within a continuous conduit/junction'box'run from the loop to the new cabinet. • Existing loops shall be tested in accordance with the Standard Specifications and the Special Provisions, and replaced as necessary. • All loop lead-in wires shall be labeled. 2.18.4.1.1.1 Loop Detectors The Design-Builder shall furnish and install R1, R2, and WR'fduction loop detectors in accordance with this RFP and Appendix I2. WR loops shall be used on all lanes wider than 12 feet, and on all non-metered ramps. The Design-Builder shall use preformed round induction loops with new pavement construction placed between subgrade and new pavement S'ectons. The Design-Builder shall use saw-cut induction loops with existing pavement. In cement concrete pavement, the Design-Builder shall locate detector loops in the center of th'e"lsne and approximately 3 feet from transverse panel joints. The Design-Builder shall furnish andinstall loop detection on all ramps, mainline lanes, and auxiliary lanes. The Design-Builder shall furnish and install passage, demand, queue, intermediate, and advance'loo'pssiii metered entrance ramps and collector-distributor roads. HOV bypass lanes requirethree loops -- a passage loop just beyond the stop bar, and a speed pair approximately 300 feet upstream of the stop bar at the ramp meter. The Design-Builder shall furnish and install queue loops at distances based on volume and storage capability of the ramp. 2.18.4.1.2 ' "Ramp Metering/Data Stations The Desig i-wilder shall install new ramp meter/data station systems along I-405 at the follows' 1o6tions: •"'<>, SR 515 to northbound 1-405 on-ramp; and • SR 169 to southbound 1-405 on-ramp. The Design-Builder shall furnish and install ramp meter poles and associated signal heads and signing to accommodate the changes in roadway geometry. The new ramp meter poles shall be Type II or Type III signal poles, if more than one lane will be metered. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 10 of 34 5-21-08 `N"` The Design-Builder shall furnish and install new data stations at the following locations, approximately: • I-405 southbound STA 1221+60; and • I-405 southbound STA 1245+50; The Design-Builder shall furnish and install new cabinets and foundations at all ramp metering and data station locations, and make the ramp meters and data stations fully-functioning and operable. The Design-Builder shall use overhead signal indicators mounted on mast-arm signal'standards when two or more lanes are metered. 2.18.4.2 CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CCTV) SYSTEM The Design-Builder shall furnish and install a CCTV system including atleast.five CCTV cameras (top pole mount), camera control cabinets, video transmitter;°video receivers, AC/DC adaptors, camera poles, foundations, and all other accessories and'conpphents to make the cameras fully-functioning and operable. CCTV cameras shall be installed at the following locations, approximately: • I-405 southbound off-ramp to SR 515 STA 80+40 • I-405 northbound STA 1209+60 (Shoulder) (Replace existing CCTV 629); %iv— • I-405 northbound STA 1228+80 (Shoulder) (Replace existing CCTV 630); • I-405 southbound STA 1245+00 (Shoulder); and • I-405 southbound STA 1256+80"(Slitiulder). The CCTV list above is based on a conceptual design, and is not a complete list. The Design- Builder shall provide a CCTV systeni'-which meets all design requirements. Therefore, more CCTV may be required. The Design-Builder shall.also furnish any equipment necessary to install the components, connections, and splices to°create a fully-functioning and operable system. Specifications for CCTV cameras and ancillary equipment are described in the Special Provisions. The Desi 01er shall ensure that all accessories and components are fully compatible with the existing: S equipment. Existirng;CCTV cameras removed within the Project limits including poles, cabinets, and associated hardware, shall be removed and salvaged to WSDOT and replaced with new equipment. The new CCTV equipment shall be installed approximately at the locations shown in Appendix M, and located to allow for future roadway widening, where possible. CCTV cameras at interchanges shall be located so as to provide a view of the intersecting arterial and ramps. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 11 of 34 5-21-08 CCTV cameras shall verify VMS messages and provide surveillance of every freeway,highway, '"rmi and ramp segment between STA 1192+00 to STA 1275+00. Further guidelines in selection of a CCTV camera site on freeways shall include the following: • Provides maximum visibility and coverage of ramp meter operations and ramp signal operations; • Provides maximum visibility and coverage of weaving and merging areas near ramps and interchanges; • Ability to provide suitable maintenance access for maintenance personnel base <on":the geometric layout of the area; • Minimizes obstructions to view caused by landscaping, trees,billboards,buildings, fixed freeway signs or topography; • Provides suitable access to the proposed communication system; and 'S • Power, communication, and underground utility consideration. % The Design-Builder shall consult with WSDOT on the placemeCCTV hardware. Camera views, accessibility, and maintainability are issues of concert fiie Design-Builder shall obtain approval from WSDOT on camera location. The Des Builder shall inspect the camera view from a bucket truck and provide video and still images of that view to WSDOT personnel, to facilitate the decision on camera location. {; 2.18.4.2.1 CCTV Camera Pole Refer to Section 2.13 and Appendix I2 for structural and foundation requirements. The Design-Builder shall paint or powde'rOat the CCTV camera pole in accordance with the requirements of the 1-405 Urban Design Criteria. New camera poles shall be usec4,for all`camera installations. 2.18.4.2.1.1 Access to'CCJyCamera Pole The Design-Builder shall construct access for maintenance vehicles such as bucket trucks, to back up adjacent to the camera pole for repairs to the camera, and to provide access back onto the freeway. Rifer to Section 2.11 for specific maintenance access requirements. 2.18.4.2.1.2,,.,. CCTV Control Cabinet it The Design=Bhilder shall furnish and install the CCTV control cabinets and shall provide all necessarytools and equipment to connect the cabinets to the cameras, electrical source, and cothmni ications system. 2.18.4.3 VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN (VMS) The Design-Builder shall furnish and install VMS at the following locations: • A new southbound VMS at I-405 STA 1253+20, approximately; and • A new VMS on northbound I-405 at I-405 STA 1239+40, approximately. ,,,,m UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 12 of 34 5-21-08 The Design-Builder shall furnish and install the VMS structures, foundations, power, software, local control panel assembly, and all other ancillary equipment and components, to create a fully- functioning and operable VMS system. A catwalk on each side of the VMS sign is required. The main catwalk for the southbound VMS at approximately STA 1253+20 shall be installed on the inside shoulder side of the VMS. Specifications for VMS and ancillary equipment are described in the Special Provisions. The Design-Builder shall furnish, install, test, and make fully-functioning and operable, a VMS in accordance with this RFP, unless otherwise specified. The Design-Builder shall position the signs to achieve the optimum sight line and maximum visibility for the vehicles approaching the sign. The new VMS shall not be mcipntedion or supported by roadway bridges. The Design-Builder shall mount the VMS to the support structure. The qestgri-Builder shall position the signs to allow motorists to view the signs, and take appr9014tbactions based on the 0, 4 sign messages; and to advise travelers of adverse road conditions itIcioling construction-related congestion. WSDOT TSMC personnel will remotely operate theMegsages on the signs. The Design-Builder shall consider the sign-viewing angleAlleiVMS location and install the VMS in accordance with manufacturer's recommendatip0 and these Technical Requirements. The Design-Builder shall design the support structure aild the color of the structure to be consistent with the requirements of the 1-405 UrOan.besign Criteria. e - %ow Refer to Section 2.13 for additional VMS requireinents. 2.18.4.3.1 Access to VMS The Design-Builder shall provide access for maintenance vehicles such as bucket trucks to back up adjacent to the VMS structure for repairs to the VMS, and to provide access back onto the freeway. Refer to Section 2.11 for specific maintenance access requirements. , o 2.18.4.4 HIGHWAY ADVISORY RADIO(HAR) -„, No new HAR signs or transi-nitters are required for the Project. 2.18.4.5 COMMUNICATION CONDUIT SYSTEM The Design4pilder shall provide a complete conduit system, including all associated conduit, cables,jyneti;Ozboxes, pull boxes, cable vaults, and accessories. Existufg3:4nch conduits for mainline fiber optic runs shall be replaced with two 4-inch conduits (With innerduct)meeting design requirements. Limits of conduit replacement shall be the fiber termWal cabinet at the SR 167 interchange to the cable vault north of data station ES-630 (approximately STA 1227+75). The Design-Builder may use existing conduit north of this cable vault in the southbound median provided it meets all design requirements. The Design-Builder shall repair or replace existing conduit as necessary to facilitate fiber optic cable replacement. Specifications for conduit and conduit systems are described in the Special Provisions. raw' UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 13 of 34 5-21-08 The Design-Builder shall use two 4-inch conduits with four 1.12-inch factory silicon-lined and installed, smooth-walled inner ducts for mainline communication. The Design-Builder shall install all communications cables within the conduit system. Direct-buried or exposed cables will not be permitted. A minimum of one spare 2-inch conduit shall be provided to each cabinet or field device, and at each roadway crossing. Inner-duct conduit shall only be used for fiber optic distribution and transmission cables. The Design-Builder shall not install pull boxes,junction boxes, or cable vaults (existing or new) in any portion of the traveled way. If final re-striping will cause the communication co'h�luit<; system to encroach the traveled way, the Design-Builder shall relocate the communications conduit system, where appropriate,to eliminate encroachment of the traveled way :,„ emporary striping causes encroachment of the traveled way with pull boxes,junction boxes, orcable vaults, these items shall be relocated outside of the traveled way, or protected iit_piaee to the satisfaction of the WSDOT Engineer while providing a safe roadway for the;public. All conduit shall be a minimum of 2 inches in diameter, except wher/-, h4ller diameter is required at the entry of some pole foundations such as ramp metef pd es}`ramp meter ahead" flashing signs, and poles with slip bases. The conduit and pull box system shall be separated from lightl4eonduits and traffic signal conduits, although a shared trench, shared power service,,rand lhared cabinet pads may be used. Where conduit is trenched, it shall be encased in red-tinifed:Controlled-Density Fill, and shall include a trace wire. When communication cable is°installed as part of a new system, the communication cable shall be kept separate fiom'aTl'other wiring. Now The Design-Builder shall furnish and install.orfe 2'-innch diameter conduit from the traffic signal controller cabinet at each ramp terminal traffic'signal within the Project limits, to the nearest freeway data station or ramp meter cabinet ,fiir fiber optic interconnection to the traffic signal controller. Refer to Section 2.16 for additional requirements. 2.18.4.5.1 City of Renton,Communication Conduit System The Design-Builder shall provide the following City of Renton communication conduit systems: • Two 80 PVC schedule 4-inch conduits with innerducts in the west side of Talbot Road South tIom the aerial location in the southwest quadrant of the South Puget Drive intersection to the northwest quadrant of the South Renton Village Place intersection; and • Two 80,PVC schedule 4-inch conduits with innerducts in the west side of Benson Road =South from STA BRS 15+00 to STA BRS 42+00. For.*hq aforementioned conduit installation in Talbot Road South and Benson Road South, the Design-Builder shall install a type 7 dual-lid junction box every 500 feet, extending to 24" depth, and install a 25-TA vault every 2,500 feet. One 25-TA vault shall be placed in close proximity to the CCTV controller cabinet and connected to the cable vault at the CCTV cabinet with two- inch conduit. Traffic rated lids shall be used. Junction boxes shall be located at intersections where possible. The two 4-inch conduits with innerducts shall be connected to existing city junction boxes, if present , especially at intersections. Pull tape shall be install with integrated UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 14 of 34 5-21-08 `o' location wire. The conduits shall be install in a common communication trench or in the traffic telemetry trench, if possible. All communication conduit systems installed for the City of Renton shall be connected to existing City of Renton communication conduit systems where possible. 2.18.4.5.2 Conduit in Structures Conduit installed within new structures shall be Rigid Galvanized Steel conduit. Where mainline communication conduit system is routed across bridge structures, the Design-Builder design, furnish, and install a structural hanger system and accompanying conduit sweeps grid joints to convey conduit under the bridge structure. Conduits mounted under bridge,structures shall be located between girders or within a box girder. Where conduits transition from the ground to a structure, the Design-Builder shall furnish and install conduit deflection fittings. The Design-Builder shall furnish and install conduit expansion �3Y._ fittings, as required. 2.18.4.5.3 Junction Boxes Junction boxes shall not be placed in the traveled way. All junction boxes in pavement shall be heavy duty Type 4, 52;"or 6. Junction boxes shall be placed 1 inch above grade in unpaved areas. The maximum spacing for junction boxes on structures"shall be 180 feet within each raceway olompf system, and a maximum spacing of 300 feet iii alt otl er areas. 2.18.4.5.4 Cable Vault and Pull,Boxes Cable vaults, pull boxes, and 25-TA;vaults=shall not be placed in the traveled way. Pull boxes shall not be placed in paved areas unless there are no other alternatives. Pull boxes placed in paved'areas shall have load-bearing lids. However, load bearing lids shall not be installed on pull b *tl at are outside of paved areas. Pull boxes shall be used forintermediate pull points where cable vaults are not needed. No splices will be allowed''in pull boxes. A pull box shall be placed at each ITS cabinet not connected to the": lainline distribution fiber. At a minimuu,,the Design-Builder shall place cable vaults at each end of the Project, and at each hub location,arable vaults shall be used as pull points, at splice locations, and where there are major-cjanges in mainline conduit direction. Cable vaults shall be located with consideration for acessil3ility, including access along arterial routes. A pull box or cable vault shall be placed at eaclr'.lT'S cabinet connected to the mainline distribution fiber. Cable vaults shall not be placed within paved areas. The minimum spacing for cable vaults is one mile. The Design-Builder shall clean existing vaults prior to installing cable. The Design-Builder shall coil and rack a minimum of 50 feet of each cable at all cable vaults and pull boxes. %e The maximum spacing for pull boxes or cable vaults in a mainline conduit run is 1,000 feet. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 15 of 34 5-21-08 2.18.4.6 COMMUNICATION CABLES AND INTERFACES The Design-Builder shall provide a communication network that meets the requirements of this RFP. Communication hardware typically consists of modems, servers, network connections, cables, connectors, and switches. The backbone of the communication network shall be single- mode fiber optic cable. The Design-Builder shall provide a complete communication cable and interface system to all ITS elements along I-405 from the fiber terminal cabinet at the SR 167 interchange, to thecable vault at the Sunset interchange,using new Single-Mode Fiber Optic (SMFO) cable. Tw)lted pair cable shall also be provided, as specified. The existing communication cable andinterface system includes the following: • Mainline trunk SMFO cable(48-strand); • Distribution SMFO cable (36-strand and 48-strand); • Distribution multi-mode fiber optic cable; and • Distribution twisted-wire pair cable. Specifications for communication cable and testing requiremenfsare described in the Special Provisions. :f The Design-Builder shall perform the following: # • Ensure the existing communications functionality during the construction period at all orf times, except for outages pre-approved„l%yWSDOT; • Design and construct a fully-functioirig:"and operable communications network to serve the highway ITS components alongtle Project; and • Propose solutions to achieve design objectives based on WSDOT functional, technical, operational, and maintenance requirements. The Design-Builder shall;furni la;and install an RMC40 Ethernet switch in every traffic signal controller cabinet at eachza'mp terminal traffic signal within the Project limits for interconnect purposes. The Design-Builder shall not substitute, apply any part, or attach any piece of equipment contrary to th�r 1anufacturer's recommendations and standard practices. The Design-Folder shall not use leased telephone lines, microwave, or wireless communications for pernlrient%ommunications systems. 2,18.441 ' Fiber Optic Cable The Design-Builder shall furnish, install, test, and maintain the following SMFO cable for mainline trunk and distribution: • New continuous 48-strand SMFO mainline cable between the fiber terminal cabinet at the I-405/SR 167 Interchange, and the median cable vault just north of Sunset Drive across from CC-638, without intermediate splices. '�rrr UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 16 of 34 5-21-08 \Aro, • New 48-strand SMFO distribution cable between the fiber terminal cabinet at the I- 405/SR 167 Interchange, and CC-638, connecting to all device cabinets in between. • The City of Renton communications link to WSDOT ITS fiber optic cable at STA 1227+75. The Design-Builder shall furnish and install a six-strand SMFO interconnect cable between traffic signal controller cabinets at each ramp terminal traffic signal within the Project limits to the nearest freeway data station or ramp meter cabinet. The WSDOT ITS Implementation Engineer will make the fiber optic connections at both ends. The Design-Builder shall locate mainline fiber optic cable conduit systems with;.consderation to access, maintainability, and forward compatibility on the freeway side of sound`walls and Right of Way fences. The Design-Builder shall minimize the number of transverse crossings of the freeway. The Design-Builder shall place the fiber optic trunk cable in conduit. Cable vaults shall not be placed within paved areas. , When fiber optic mainline cable parallels overhead electrical transpire ° lines, the Design- Builder shall locate the fiber optic cable as far from the transmi iyon4tnes as possible. The Design-Builder shall not place the fiber optic cable within a d)tcli&bear culvert clean-out areas. The Design-Builder shall design a temporary fiber optic ca lesystem as required to maintain continuous communication of all ITS components (distribution and transmission) throughout construction. Newly All fiber optic cable shall be designed and routed through pull boxes. Fiber optic cable shall not be routed through junction boxes. The Design'Builder shall remove existing multi-mode and single-mode fiber optic cables and twisted:<paircables that will be unused. Splices in distribution cable shall be performed inside pull boxes or cable vaults placed in the vicinity of ITS cabinets. The splices:,shall be connected to ITS cabinets with pre-terminated cables. 2.18.4.6.2 IntentionallyO,mitted 2.18.4.6.3 Fiber Optic Connection Components 2.18.4.6.3.1 ,Indoor Patch Cords The Design,Builder shall supply all patch cords in accordance with this RFP. 2.18.4.6..:3.2% Indoor Pigtails Tle Design-Builder shall furnish and install indoor pigtails. The indoor pigtails shall be used to terniixiate fiber optic cables, installed between a splice tray and a patch panel, and described as follows: • All splices shall be fusion spliced; and • Indoor pigtails shall meet patch cord requirements. '41101e. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 17 of 34 5-21-08 0109 2.18.4.6.3.2.1 FC-UPC Fiber Connectors '44 The Design-Builder shall use factory-installed FC-UPC connectors with yellow or blue boots for single-mode fibers and shall follow these requirements: • FC-UPC connector loss shall be < 0.3 dB; maximum reflectance value shall be-55 dB; • Connector ratings shall be from -22 degrees Fahrenheit to 140 degrees Fahrenheit for operation; and from -40 degrees Fahrenheit to 140 degrees Fahrenheit for storage; • Connectors shall have protective caps; • Connectors shall be secured to the aramid fibers surrounding the individualkoptic fibers; • Connector bodies shall be of one-piece construction, have metallic coupling,sits and bodies, and zirconia ceramic ferrules; and • Boots shall be glued in place to prevent spinning. 2.18.4.6.3.3 Patch Panel Components The Design-Builder shall furnish and install new patch panels d;distribution panels in each ITS cabinet. Refer to the Special Provisions and Appendix I2 t J Ch panel component requirements. Splices in distribution fiber optic cable slhall b%,accomplished in the adjacent pull box or cable vault, and the fiber optic cable shall be connected to panels with pigtails. 2.18.4.6.3.4 Outdoor Fiber Splice Closure The Design-Builder shall provide an outdoo #flier splice closure, which includes an outer enclosure and plastic splice trays. The>,Design`-Builder shall provide the outdoor fiber splice closures in accordance with the 1-405 Urban Design Criteria. The temperature rating for the splice closure shall be-22 degrees Fahrenheit to 140 degrees Fahrenheit. 2.18.4.6.3.4.1 Outer Enclosure. The Design-Builder shal,7provide an outer enclosure, which meets the following requirements: • Protects splices"from damage; • Is composed of salt corrosion-resistant material and compatible materials not supporting galvanic cell action; • `U:;re°enterable; Permits splicing without circuit disruption; • Has a grounding lug(ground all fiber optic cable shields); and • Has cable(trunk and pigtail) strain relief and is compatible with the inner enclosure, splice trays, and cables. 2.18.4.6.3.4.2 Splice Closure The Design-Builder shall provide a splice closure, which allows re-entry of fiber optic cable. The splice closure shall permit the cable to enter without exceeding the minimum bending ,moo UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 18 of 34 5-21-08 %%We radius; shall have non-oxidizing coating on all connections; and shall have a cable clamp bonding it to the cable. The enclosure shall have space to terminate up to two trunk cables. The splice closure shall permit selective fiber splicing(i.e., a cable can loop in and out with only the selected fibers cut). 2.18.4.6.3.4.3 Splice Tray The Design-Builder shall provide a plastic splice tray(inner enclosure), which meets the following requirements: • Allows entry to individual fibers; • Is stackable; • Holds 12 splices and 24 fibers; • Does not violate the bare fiber bend radius; and • Has room for identification of the splice on the cover. y 2.18.4.6.3.5 Wireless Communications9, The Design-Builder shall not use wireless communicationsbetween field devices and communication nodes, with the exception of temporary;communications during construction as permitted in this RFP. 2.18.4.6.3.6 Twisted Pair Media Twisted pair media(in addition to the SMFO':system) is required for the Project's permanent communications system. The twisted fair"media shall be used to connect the Tukwila Hub to ITS devices on I-405 to the north of SR 16'9. The Design-Builder shall furnish andlnstall continuous twisted pair media from the fiber terminal cabinet at the I-405/SR167 Interchange to CC-638, without any splices. The Design- Builder shall install a 66;position.punch down terminal block in the CC-638 cabinet. 2.18.4.7VIDEO,VOICE:AN DATA DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM The Design-Builder shall furnish and install all necessary distribution and transmission equipment to;provide the ITS required by the Contract. The Design-Builder shall furnish and install all devices for the Video, Voice, and Data Distribut oir*d Transmission Systems, in accordance with the Special Provisions, the Standard Sped/N.410ns, and the WSDOT Northwest Region ITS Design Guide. The<D:esign-Builder shall furnish and install RuggedCom RMC30 serial-to-ethernet converters and RuggedCom RMC40 ethernet switches in Electronic Surveillance (ES) and VMS cabinets. The Design-Builder shall also furnish and install RuggedCom RMC40 ethernet switches in CCTV cabinets. In addition to the items being installed in the Tukwila Hub at the I-405 and I-5 UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 19 of 34 5-21-08 immorommommosimmomor interchange for communication with field equipment, the Design-Builder shall furnish and install the following into the new Tukwila Hub: • One Optelecom 9000 series chassis with two power supplies; • Seven Optelecom 9225T video transmitter cards; • Seven Optelecom 9221R video receiver cards; • Two Decimux video receivers; • Two Decimux video transmitters; • One Vicon EIA-422 Broadcast Units; • One RuggedCom RS900 Ethernet switch; and 2.18.4.7.1 Intentionally Omitted 2.18.4.7.2 Intentionally Omitted • 2.18.4.7.3 Intentionally Omitted 2.18.4.8 COMMUNICATION HUBS 4 Data from the field devices shall be transmitted to the:.l b through twisted wire pair copper and single-mode fiber optic cables. This data shall be,placed on single-mode fiber optic cables and N sent to the TSMC where it may be compiled for immediate use and stored for future use. The Design-Builder shall provide the required communication equipment to support the new field devices provided as part of the Project,in accordance with the Special Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and Appendix I °% 2.18.4.9 ELECTRICAL SERVICE Refer to Section 2.16. 2.18.4.9.1 Furnished and Installed Service Equipment yam/ The Design-Builder shall furnish and install all required electrical service equipment and transformers. Re-fer to Section 2.16 for electrical services. 2.18.4.9.2 Coordination with Power Utility Refgrto Secti(n 2.16 for electrical services. 2:1$.4.1;0 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 2.18.4.11 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 2.18.4.12 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 20 of 34 5-21-08 2.18.5 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS The Design-Builder shall design the ITS as a whole before installation of any individual field component, including temporary and permanent ITS. The Design-Builder shall notify WSDOT a minimum of five Calendar Days in advance of staking locations for ITS devices. The Design- Builder shall not make final connections of the newly-installed or temporary ITS components to the existing system until receiving acceptance from WSDOT. 2.18.5.1.1 Salvage The Design-Builder shall salvage the existing ITS, signal, and illumination equipment includin g cabinets, poles, cameras, VMSs, luminaires, and associated equipment, and alt ottier equipment requested by WSDOT to the WSDOT Northwest Region Signal and ITS Maintenance Superintendent at the following address: 3700 - 9th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98134 ri Telephone: (206) 442-2110 The Design-Builder shall give notice to the WSDOT Northwest egion Signal and ITS Maintenance Superintendent five Calendar Days prior to delbW. The Design-Builder shall provide all labor and equipment to transport, load, unload%,anal store the salvaged items. 2.18.5.2 SURVEILLANCE TO SUPPORT MOTORIST-INFORMATION DURING CONSTRUCTION Nape Existing ITS elements, including CCTV cameras�.ramp meters, VMS, HAR, and data stations, shall remain operational during constructiorro.:f the Project, except during the allowable working hours. Prior to the installation of new equipment, the Design-Builder shall provide temporary equipment for locations where the existing equipment will be removed, unless otherwise permitted in this RFP. 2.18.5.3 ALLOWABLE WORKING HOURS ON THE ITS All ITS devices, whethe0sideor outside of the Project limits, shall not be taken out of operation by the Design-Builder, and shall remain operational during all phases of construction. The Design-Builder shall work on active ITS elements within the Project from 9 p.m. to 4 a.m., only. Unless othFrvs&specified in this RFP, the Design-Builder shall contact the WSDOT ITS Implementation Engineer a minimum of seven Calendar Days prior to performing any Work on existing and active ITS devices and 30 days in advance of performing any Work on the Hub. The.Design-Builder shall perform all Work in a manner ensuring the integrity and proper perfcntance of all ITS components. Liquidated damages will be assessed for unplanned ITS disruptions (see Section 1-08 of the General Provisions). UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 21 of 34 5-21-08 2.18.5.4 REPAIR PARTS Niiiii The Design-Builder shall identify local vendors for repair parts during construction for all ITS components, so that the parts can be obtained within four hours. The Design-Builder shall provide a list of vendors to WSDOT within 45 Calendar Days of execution of the Contract. 2.18.5.5 MATERIALS AND FABRICATION The Design-Builder shall round and smooth sharp corners and edges on all ITS components,that the Design-Builder furnishes and installs. �:s 2.18.5.5.1 Intentionally Omitted 2.18.5.6 UTILITY LOCATES Refer to Section 2.16. 2.18.5.7 EQUIPMENT PROVIDED BY WSDOT The Design-Builder shall furnish and provide all ITS componein, %and`materials. 2.18.5.7.1 Vehicle Detection /,; •.,, The Design-Builder shall install induction loop detectors for permanent detection in accordance with Section 2.18. In areas where new pavement will be constructed,,the Design-Builder shall install the loops in the pavement base in advance of the pavement surfacing. The Design-Builder shall coordinate installation of detector loop with the base and paving operations. When installing queue detection loops, the Design-Builder shall evaluate the site conditions, and determine the locations of queue detection loops and the advance queue detection loops. The Design-Builder shall consult with,WSDOT to determine the distance when the distance is specified as "varies" in Aperitix<I. 2.18.5.7.1.1Intent 6011 Omitted 2.18.5.7.1.2 Non»intrusive Detection The Design-Buldershall use induction loops for all permanent data station and ramp meter installations " ` hC use of non-intrusive detection technologies may be considered for temporary data coll 'ctiOn'during construction with approval from WSDOT. 2;1615;742` Ramp Meter Stations Rampmeters shall include the proper advance signing with flashing beacons. Reconfiguration of the on-ramp from SR 169 to southbound 1-45 reires northbound SR 505 to northboundlI 1405 also new two-lane ramp meter. The new on-ramp from requires installation of a new two-lane ramp meter. The ramp metering stations shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the Special 'isiti Provisions, Appendices II and 12, and the WSDOT Design Manual. UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 22 of 34 5-21-08 Now., 2.18.5.7.2.1 Ramp Meter Signal Foundation The Design-Builder shall design the foundation size and shape in accordance with the geotechnical requirements in Section 2.6. 2.18.5.7.2.1.1 Grounding The Design-Builder shall perform grounding in accordance with this RFP. 2.18.5.7.2.1.2 Ramp Meter Pole The Design-Builder shall furnish and install the pole base and the pole shaft for the tamp'meter signals and flashers. The ramp meter pole shall be a Type II or Type RM signal standard. The Design-Builder shall install the ramp meter signal and flasher poles in accorda'tce With the applicable provisions of Standard Plan No. J-7a and Section 8-20 of the Standard Specifications. 2.18.5.7.2.1.3 Signal Head Assembly / The Design-Builder shall install powder-coated cast aluminum bacicgtitt'nd shields with reinforced edges on the upper heads. The Design-Builder shajlGnotrisstall a background shield on the lower heads. The Design-Builder shall install metal reinforcement plates,for the top and bottom of the polycarbonate signal head to improve the structural stability of the signal head mounting bracket. 2.18.5.7.2.1.4 Control Cable and Connections,-. The Design-Builder shall install general purpgseIamp meter signal and flasher control cables rated for 600 volts. The Design-Buildershall comply with the IMSA specifications for the control cables. 2.18.5.7.2.1.5 Ramp Control Signa7Signing The Design-Builder shall provide,all necessary signing in accordance with the Special Provisions, Appendix Ii,ap i the WSDOT Design Manual. 2.18.5.7.2.2 Maintaining Ramp Metering During Construction risting ramprneter equipment shall remain operational until new ramp meter equipment is installed, and traff e-controlling or temporary ramp meter equipment is installed. When any in-place ramp meter is to be off-line due to construction during any time in which the ramp::. tcz is normally in operation, the Design-Builder shall install a temporary ramp meter. Tenpoi`pry ramp meters shall be compatible with the existing system; communicate in real-time wit :{die TSMC; and include all associated signing and pavement marking for ramp meter operations. 2.18.5.8 CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION(CCTV) SYSTEM The Design-Builder shall furnish and install CCTV cameras, controller cabinets, and other accessories required to make the CCTV system fully-functioning and operable, as described in err► UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 23 of 34 5-21-08 this Section. The Design-Builder shall notify WSDOT when the installation of the CCTV hardware is complete. 2.18.5.8.1 Maintaining Camera Surveillance During Construction The freeway management system cameras are used to detect and verify incidents in the construction zone. The existing cameras shall remain operational, or temporary cameras shall be installed as follows: • When any existing camera is to be off-line due to construction for greater than Aiibtirs, the Design-Builder shall install a temporary camera. The temporary camera shah4-1e installed and operational within 24 hours of the removal of the existing camerae;,,; Temporary cameras shall be compatible with the existing system; shall have the same functionality as the existing system; shall be installed at approximatetel as the m height they the existing cameras; and shall be aligned to produce an identical replace. i The Design-Builder may provide wireless communications for maij raining temporary communications with the CCTV cameras. If wireless communications are used, the Design- Builder shall provide 100 percent duty cycle to allow continuaylg' ollmg. The Design-Builder shall provide full motion National Television System Con .tt'ee video and EIA/RS 422 communication for pan-tilt-zoom. The Design-Builde�r,�tall submit proposed wireless components for review and acceptance by WSDOT,to ensure compliance with the existing communications network. 2.18.5.8.2 Variable Message Sign (VIVIS)' Thgn e Desi -Builder shall furnish and install=;,two VMSs, in accordance with this Section; and the controller cabinets and all other accessories'required to make the VMSs fully-fun tions ng. The operable. Installation shall be in accordance with the Special Provisions and App Design-Builder shall notify the;,:..W....,:SDOT Electrical Inspector when the installation of the VMS hardware is complete. � The Design-Builder shall%spply all equipment and personnel each VMS w needed to chin ten days o, transport, f unload the VMS. The Design-Builder shall provide power delivery of the VMS, di house the VMS in a controlled atmosphere facility. 2.18.5.8.3 ' „Maintaining VMS During Construction , The VMS ay yI<Sed to inform drivers of incidents prior to, within, and beyond the construction woxcav'rie. `txisting or new VMS shall remain operational at all times. 2A1g,,5.8 4 Intentionally Omitted 2.18.5.9 HIGHWAY ADVISORY RADIO(HAR) No new permanent HAR signs or transmitters are required for the Project. Nriud UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 24 of 34 5-21-08 2.18.5.10 COMMUNICATION CONDUIT SYSTEM Unless otherwise specified, the Design-Builder may use existing conduit when available, provided all design criteria are satisfied. Where existing conduit shall be replaced, abandoned, or is otherwise not acceptable, the Design-Builder shall furnish and install new conduit. The Design-Builder shall not relocate or use salvaged conduit. The Design-Builder shall not direct-bury fiber optic cable. The Design-Builder shall install fiber optic cable in conduit for the entire length of the Project. The Design-Builder shall use kli - Density Polyethylene non-metallic conduit for plowed or bored conduit installations, and°PVC for trenched conduit installations. The Design-Builder shall ensure that the conduit and conduit splices sustain a:pressure of 150 psi. The Design-Builder shall immediately cap all open ends of installed conduit° ntil cables are installed. "Abandon conduit"shall mean the Design-Builder removes"'the1:nused cables and conduit elbows. Standard bell ends shall be installed on all conduit ends by thO resign-Builder to prevent damage to the installed cable. With open trench installations of conduit, the Design-Builder shall place the conduit a minimum of 3 feet below the bottom of the pavement. The Desigr1.iiilder shall place granular material in the bottom of the trench, and shall compact the granular material to a depth of 6 inches over the err' top of the conduit. Refer to Sections 2-16 and8-20,of the Standard Specifications for additional requirements. The Design-Builder shall install PVC used forfiber optic cable a minimum of 24 inches below the finished grade. The Design-Builder shall install warning tape in accordance with the Special Provisions and Appendix I2. The Design-Builder shaltuse yellow-colored split conduit or half non-metallic conduit to protect fiber optic cable through junction boxes. The Design-Builder shall extend the conduit 2 inches beyond the interior junction box walls and seal openings cut in the junction box with a material- compatible compound to make the opening watertight. Conduit under pavement shall be installed in accordance with Section 2.16. 2.18.5.10.1; %'Existing Conduit Systems Bistingconduit systems may consist of stick PVC, stick polyethylene, continuous polyethylene, or Rigid Steel Conduit. When installing fiber optic cable assemblies in existing conduits through existing junction boxes, the Design-Builder shall check the cable route to ensure that there is a smooth transition between exit and entrance elevations, and that the horizontal angle is not so sharp as to cause damage to the cable as it is being pulled through the existing conduit. If the Design-Builder encounters sharp bends, the Design-Builder shall install new conduit to provide a smooth transition. Ati.r° UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 25 of 34 5-21-08 In accordance with Section 8-20 of the Standard Specifications and the Special Provisions, the Design-Builder shall clean the existing conduit of any debris that could impede pulling fiber optic or copper cable through it, or that could damage the cable if the debris remained. 2.18.5.10.2 Non-Metallic Conduit(NMC) le 80 The Design-Builder shall use Non-Metallic Conduit (NMC) PVC schedule 40 may be used in all other conduit t installations under paved areas. NMC PVC installations,unless otherwise specified. 2.18.5.10.3 Junction Boxes Junction boxes serve as collection points for conduits entering a cabinet or service. The Design-Builder shall place junction boxes adjacent to all control c binr eis, 1 provide tworical ce points, and detector stations. For each detector station, the Des gn i junction boxes for each direction of travel—one on the outside shoulder,attcl one in the median. On long conduit runs, the Design-Builder shall space junction bqxes tio-farther apart than 300 feet. 'f When the junction box is abandoned,the Design-Builder shall rcrnove the junction box in accordance with the Standard Specifications. !'%,; Prior to use,the Design-Builder shall clean and adjust td':grade the existing junction boxes installed by others. All metallic junction box lids shall be grounded;including any existing junction boxes that are to remain. Junction boxes shall not be placed in the'`traveled roadway. Junction boxes shall not be used for conduit runs containing fiber optic cable. Pull boxes shall be used for this application. Any junction boxes locatedpwithin paved areas shall be Heavy Duty Type 4, 5, or 6. The Design-Builder shall consult with WSDOT for locations where Heavy Duty junction boxes are proposed. Refer to Appendix T5 for junction box details. Junction boxes located outside of paved areas shall be Type 1, 2, or 7. < ...:. "'"Cable Vault and Pull Boxes 2.18.5.10.4 /!,,,,,,, grounding The Design )ilder shall include a drainage system, gr grovisions, enclosure hanger p bracket;assembly, and a ground rod marker in the construction of a fiber optic splice vault. Tif .fiber optic splice vault shall protect the outdoor fiber splice closure, and shall meet the follo5ving requirements: • The vault and lid material shall meet the UL requirements for Tier 10 heavy-duty splice vault; • The vault lid shall have a non-slip surface; UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 26 of 34 5-21-08 • The Design-Builder shall provide one ferrous device for every three vaults the Design- Builder furnishes and installs, to lift the cover from the body; and • The fiber optic cables shall sweep up near the vault to meet the conduit entrance to the vault. 2.18.5.11 COMMUNICATION CABLES AND INTERFACES The Design-Builder shall furnish and install materials and equipment such that the highway ITS communications network is continuous throughout the Project, and provides a smooth frai tion to the existing communication network at each end. Identical sub-components shall:be"defined as components of the same manufacturer, model, and installation configuration :' e highway ITS communications sub-components shall include the following: • Fiber optic cable; • Communication end equipment; and • Splice vaults, splice closures, and fiber optic connection ccftnpb,neits. All locations containing identical equipment shall be configuredandwired in an identical manner by the Design-Builder, including internal wiring and-harnesses, wiring color codes, •labeling terminal block positions, termination strips,pow�r'sery ce configuration, and panel and equipment mounting and locations. 2.18.5.11.1 Fiber Optic Cable The Design-Builder shall replace each fiber otj cable that is nicked, severed, or otherwise rendered unusable due to Work performed,as part of the Contract. Spliced fiber optic cable shall be replaced with new, unspliced cable, uhhless otherwise provided for in this RFP. Liquidated Damages may apply in accordance with Section 1-08 of the General Provisions. The Design- Builder shall notify the WSDOT Electrical Inspector as soon as cable damage is discovered. The Design-Builder shall exereisecaution and excavate manually using hand-held tools when exposing an existing fibez cptie=�t'able. The Design-Builder shall report all nicks or abrasions to the WSDOT Electrical Inspector prior to replacement. The Design-Builder shall not exceed the bending radius while handling and re-routing the cable. The Design-Builder shall furnish and install new fiber optic cable for the Project and shall provide a temporayfiber optic cable system, if required, to provide a continuous and complete operation of the ITS distribution and transmission system. The:Desi n-Builder shall use lubricants during cable-pulling operations, in accordance with the Special Provisions. The lubricants shall be compatible with cable insulation materials, and shall not"deteriorate the cable insulation. The Design-Builder shall use stock, approved splice kits to repair any WSDOT fiber optic cable damaged by construction activities. In the event a cable is severed or otherwise rendered not usable because of Work preformed as part of the Contract, the Design-Builder shall perform the following activities: • Use mechanical splices to make the initial emergency repair to fiber optic cable. It is not necessary to install the mechanical splices if all fibers (severed and not severed) are fusion-spliced within 24 hours of severing the cable. Install the splices in existing splice UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 27 of 34 5-21-08 vaults using all of the materials required for splicing fiber optic cable. The fusion splices shall meet the requirements for splices made by the Design-Builder. The Design-Builder shall install approved fiber optic cable(with fusion splices)before WSDOT accepts the communication system installation. • Install new cable between existing terminations or splices as appropriate for cable severed because of Work performed as part of the Contract. • If nicks or abrasions occur,the Design-Builder shall replace the entire fiber optic,cable run with new fiber optic cable. 2.18.5.11.1.1 Fiber Optic Cable Installation The Design-Builder shall install cable in accordance with the Special Provisions and the following: The Design-Builder shall calculate the expected tension on fiber 4.t c trunk cable and • 'I'h Design-Builder shall pulling tape prior to installing trunk cable in conduit runs. distribute the pulling force between the inner strength mei }b'ez;aiid the aramid fibers by securing both to the main pulling device. • The Design-Builder shall use a"break-away"type pullifidattachment to protect against over-stressing the cable. The Design-Builder sha11"' ot"use a cable grip that pulls only on the outer jacket to pull fiber optic cable. • Damage to the cable from any source which exceeds the manufacturer's recommended tirr� tensile strength limits or cable-bending4dius'is cause for the cables to be rejected. The Design-Builder shall ensure a minimum;-loaded bend radius of 10 inches, and a minimum- installed bend radius of 8 inches ,:'% "'`" 2.18.5.11.1.2 Fiber Optic Cable Splicing The Design-Builder shall splice"fiber optic cable as part of the fiber optic pigtail termination as specified in the Special P,r6viSlopg. The Design-Builder shall fusion-splice the fiber optic cable only. Cable splices will be allowed if approved by WSDOT; only at the location specified; and then only when there are no practical alternatives. Splices shall be made in cabinets and splice vaults using splice closures approved by WSDOT. '',;,,;' The Desigri'$uilder shall follow the fiber optic cable manufacturer's methods, recommendations, materia10 aril techniques for splicing. Tje Design-Builder's splicing equipment shall be in good working order, properly calibrated, xh ancreet all industry standards and safety regulations. The cable preparation, closure installation, and splicing shall be accomplished in accordance with industry standards. To minimize mechanical stress and splicing locations, cables shall be trained into final position observing minimum bending radii of the cable of not less than 20 times the diameter of the cable, or as specified in the manufacturer's requirements,whichever is greater. Nod UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 28 of 34 5-21-08 Cleanliness and freedom from contamination shall be strictly observed with respect to splicing materials and joint construction. Upon completion of the splicing operation, the Design-Builder shall deposit all waste material in suitable containers, remove it from the job site, and dispose of it in accordance with State and Federal law. 2.18.5.11.1.3 Fiber Optic Connection Components Fiber optic connection components may be required to connect cable installed to the ITS communications network for the Project. The Design-Builder shall follow the requirements:of the necessary components in the following sections. 2.18.5.11.1.4 Patch Panel Components N. The Design-Builder shall furnish and install patch panels in accordance with tlsR"P and the Special Provisions, at the following locations: • All ITS cabinets. , The Design-Builder shall provide additional matching fiber distr,butc3n%components as needed � l e.g., splice trays, patch panel,patch cords, and six packs). 2.18.5.11.1.5 Fiber Optic Cable Identification Requirementsy The Design-Builder shall identify all fiber optic cable..at,aIt terminals, and whenever the cable is entering or leaving a vault,junction box, housing, or enclosure. The Design-Builder shall use permanent non-conducting white-colored heat shrink wraps, with identification based on the ITS detail sheets fastened securely to the cables. ' : The Design-Builder shall use cable designations that consistently conform to the accepted overall scheme developed by the Design-Builder to indicate location, circuit, device, cable number, terminal branch, and position. The Design-Builder shall use letters and numbers. The surface of the outer jackets shall be printed with the manufacturer's identification, date of manufacture, and part number;,., 2.18.5.11.1.6 OutdoorFiber Splice Closure The Design-Builder shall install sufficient desiccant (packaged silica) in the enclosure to reduce possible damage moisture, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. 2.18.5.11.1,.7,, ;Splice Protection The ;es gn-Builder shall mount all splices on the splice tray. Polyethylene tubes shall protect the;fibers,and ethylene vinyl acetate sleeves with stainless steel rods shall protect the splices. Virir] trarkers shall identify each fiber in the enclosure. 2.18.5.12 ELECTRIC, ELECTRONIC,VMS CONTROL, VIDEO,AND TELEPHONE CABLES Electric, electronic, VMS control, video, and telephone cables may exist within the Project limits and may be impacted by construction activities and/or require replacement. The Design-Builder shall exercise caution when working near existing cables. When exposing existing cables, the 'owle Design-Builder shall excavate manually using only hand-held tools. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 29 of 34 5-21-08 wormimmimmaiimoomilimimr Industry-accepted lubricants used during cable pulling operations shall be compatible with cable insulation materials and shall not degrade the cable insulation. The Design-Builder shall stock splice kits meeting the technical requirements to repair any cable damaged by construction activities. When making temporary twisted pair control cable splices,the Design-Builder shall use button-style, gel-filled, crimp-on,butt splices enclosed in zippered poly bags. The Design- Builder shall protect the splices above ground until the permanent splices are installed. For cable damaged by Work performed as part of the Contract,the Design-Builder shall install new cable between existing terminations or splices. The Design-Builder shall seal all nicks or abrasions caused when exposing a cable byhand'- digging, with rubber splicing tape. The Design-Builder shall seal a nick penetzatrigtfie cable jacket to the underlying material with a cast epoxy kit using 3M Scotchcast kits,and3M Scotch #23 rubberized splicing tape that have met the requirements for cable jacket repair, or by using an equivalent approved by WSDOT. All cables connecting equipment such as VMS, CCTV cameras, and,ca nets shall conform to the equipment manufacturer's specifications, the Special Provisipri's;,and'the Standard Specifications. 2.18.5.12.1 Electric and Electronic Cable The Design-Builder shall not splice electric or electronic cables without the WSDOT Electrical Inspector's acceptance. The Design-Builder shall use:one-piece cables between termination points for power, control, and RF cables. :> When using crimp-on connectors, the Design-Builder shall install the insulation of electrical cables deep enough into the lug so that the"insulation acts as a strain relief. The Design-Builder shall maintain the electrical continuity of the ecable shies lin accordance. TheDg-h the Builder shall ground all cable shields entering cabinets and splice Special Provisions. The Design-Builder shall comply with Section 3.3 of the USDA RUS Splicing Standard PC-2 for shield:bonding. The Design-Builder shall use bonding connectors complying with RUS stanard PE-33 (Cable Shield Connectors). 2.18.5.12.2 VMS Control Cable The VMS contracable shall be installed between the VMS ground control cabinet and the sign cabinet. -„ The DesigiiyBuilder shall furnish and install VMS control cable and all necessary cables and accessories in accordance with the Special Provisions and the manufacturer's specifications,to rriake t4 VMS operational. The D"esign-Builder shall pull the VMS control cable between the ground control cabinet and the sign cabinet, and terminate it. The Design-Builder shall provide 10 feet of coiled slack cable in the ground control cabinet, and 40 feet in the sign cabinet. 2.18.5.12.3 Video/Control Cable and Accessories for CCTV Camera UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 30 of 34 5-21-08 The Design-Builder shall furnish and install CCTV control cable and all other necessary cables and accessories in accordance with the Special Provisions and the manufacturer's specifications, to make the CCTV cameras operational. 2.18.5.13 GROUNDING The Design-Builder shall install a grounding system and protection devices that are suitable for the specific installation and equipment being supplied, in accordance with the Special Provisions, Section 8-20 of the Standard Specifications, and Standard Plan J-9a. 2.18.5.14 CONTROL CABINETS The Design-Builder shall furnish and install the control cabinets, and make thein functional. The Design-Builder shall ensure that the existing control cabinets are operationalzat all times, outside of the allowable working hours identified in this Section. The Design-Builder shall use industry-standard fiber management pr 'cti;es'and techniques in all control cabinets. 2.18.5.14.1 Control Cabinet—334 Series Cabinets shall be powder-coated in accordance with the44r4D5 Urban Design Criteria. The Design-Builder shall supply all equipment needed to;load, transport, and unload the cabinet. The Design-Builder shall install the control cabinet which includes mounting the cabinet on its foundation, terminating the power cables, grounding the cabinet, and terminating the communications cables. 2.18.5.14.2 VMS Control Cabinet The Design-Builder shall furnish and:install 334 series VMS control cabinets. The Design-Builder shall jnstallthe control cabinet, which includes mounting the cabinet on its foundation, terminatingthe power cables, grounding the cabinet, and terminating the communications cables. , 2.18.5.15 VIDEO,VOICE,AND DATA DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM The Video, Viand Data Distribution and Transmission Systems shall be designed and constructed: n accordance with this RFP, and with the Special Provisions. 2.18.5.10 %ITS COMMUNICATION HUB The shall provide the required communication equipment to support the new field`devices provided as part of the Project, in accordance with the Special Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and Appendix H. The Design-Builder shall schedule access to the Hub with the WSDOT Maintenance Superintendent. WSDOT maintenance staff may be present when the Design-Builder is accessing the Hub. 2.18.5.17 INTENTIONALLY OMITTED *gree 2.18.5.18 COMPONENT, TEST,AND PROJECT DOCUMENTATION UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 31 of 34 5-21-08 The Design-Builder shall prepare and submitic documentation. Twolsets of The test documentation shall include completed forms and elect on component and test documentation shall be submitted directly to WSDOT for acceptance. The Design-Builder shall notify WSDOT when all ITS requirements have been met. WSDOT will accept the ITS after verifying the proper operation of all components. 2.18.5.18.1 Fiber Optic Cable Test Documentation The Design-Builder shall submit fiber optic cable test documentation (including calibration"and certification of the fiber optic cable test equipment), as part of the component documefitation;" and any testing documentation required in accordance with the Special Provision , The Design-Builder shall follow the format of the Fiber Optic System Test Plan. The Design-Builder shall use WSDOT's file naming convention for all testfles, and shall provide all test documentation on a CDROM to WSDOT. The Design-Builder shall provide a test summary describing the"fiiial-..",,,/easurements that are out of range; any approved changes in specified methods; and actuafdates of tests performed by both power meter and Optical Time Domain Reflectometer. Upon completion of the Project, the Design-Builder shalLpro"y,,i"de the TSMC System Inspector with two copies of the manufacturer's reel (spool) te0ocumentation. 2.18.5.18.2 Maintenance/Operation of Furnished and Installed ITS Components Plan The Design-Builder shall submit to WSDOT,a(written plan for providing maintenance and operation of ITS components furnished"and installed by the Design-Builder, a minimum of 21 Calendar Days prior to performing Work": ;on=any portion of the ITS. 2.18.6 SUBMITTALS The Design-Builder shall comk 1—with Sections 2.12 and 2.28 for plan/test report submittals, reviews, and other adminisafyeirocesses,unless otherwise specified. 2.18.6.1 ITS PRELIMINARY PLANS SUBMITTAL The ITS Preliminary Plans, Fiber Optic System Test, and other test plans described in this Section shall be'submitted to WSDOT for review as part of the Preliminary Design Submittal described in,SOtion 2.12. In addition, the ITS design for the City of Renton communication conduit s>yste "shall be submitted to the City of Renton for review. Tl�, ;Preliminary Plans Submittal shall include the devices described in this Section, in addli<tion`to the following: • Title block,north arrow, and scale bar; • Legend of symbols; • Existing ITS features and utilities; • Locations of all proposed ITS devices with labels; UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 32 of 34 5-21-08 Now' • Communication schematics and fiber distribution diagrams; • Proposed channelization; • Temporary ITS plan; • Proposed fiber optic cable/conduit location plan; • Cabinet locations; • Power service locations; and • Power distribution schematic. 2.18.6.2 ITS FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL The Design-Builder shall provide an ITS Final Design Submittal, as part of the Final Design Submittals described in Section 2.12, that addresses the comments received from the ITS Preliminary Plans Submittal review, and any issues raised during they,F$,apsign meetings. g The ITS Final Design Submittal shall be complete and include al,1,02.flie,ttems from the ITS Preliminary Plans, in addition to the following: • All ITS details in accordance with Appendix 12; „ • All ITS labels; • Calculations to support transformer sizing and ITan§former over current protection *tar- devices; • Pull box, cable vault, and junction boxjkations and details; • Conduit fill and junction box capacity calculations; • Service load calculations; • Fiber optic splice detail ,, . e • Loop termination,chednle;' • Panel service detail's, • Transformer/breaker schedule; • Cabinet foundation details; • HubAtetaifS; • ,.; Fiberiermination cabinet details; • 4, VMS support structure and foundation details; • CCTV camera pole structure details; • Foundation details for CCTV camera poles; • Details for non-standard elements; and • Wire notes (including identification of new and existing conductors and cable) and *ow' construction notes. UT 01312 - Exhibit A - Attachment 1 PAGE 33 of 34 5-21-08 '4.44100 The Design-Builder shall submit a Fiber Optic Splicing and Testing Plan with each Final Design Submittal that includes ITS Work. 2.18.6.3 RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION ITS PLANS Refer to Sections 2.12 and 2.28 for submittal and review requirements. 2.18.6.4 OTHER SUBMITTALS • Component,test, and project documentation; • Fiber optic cable test documentation; • Maintenance and Operations Plan; and • Product manuals. ***10 *MO UT 01312 - Exhibit A- Attachment 1 PAGE 34 of 34 5-21-08 UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT UT 01312 WORK BY STATE - ACTUAL COST EXHIBIT "B" FUNDING COMMITMENT Construction of City of Renton Fiber Optic System Conduit for Realignment of Benson Road and Construction of Talbot Road Interchange ITEM DESCRIPTION I QUANTITY I UNITS I CUNIT OST I COST Construction of New Fiber Optic Conduit On SR 515 and Benson Road S Communication and Conduit System Conduits and Junction Boxes 4-inch Schedule 80 PVC Conduit with 4 Innerducts 8400 L.F $ 18.00 $ 151,200.00 Type 7 Junction Box 12 EACH $ 347.50 $ 4,170.00 Pull Box 3 EACH $ 1,470.00 $ 4,410.00 Boring/Casing/Trenching Trenching and Backfill 3150 L.F. $ 8.70 $ 27,405.00 Benson Road Structure Conduit Hangers and Blockouts 1 L.S. $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Mobilization Clean up 1 LOT $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 1 LOT $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Construction Cost Sub Total $ 200,185.00 Sales Tax(8.9%of Contract) $ 17,816.47 Design-Builder Design/Construction Engineering,QA/QC and Administration $ 32,029.60 WSDOT Design/Construction Management $ 22,020.35 Contingency Total Cost $ 20,018.50 II I $ 292,069.92 TOTAL ESTMATED CITY COST @ 100% $ 292,069.92 TOTAL ESTMATED STATE COST @ 0% $ sloe UT 01312 - Exhibit B PAGE 1 OF 1 05-21-08 USER NAME: mMdwell DATE.sDATER TIME.1:38.49PR POET DRIVER: ,D8 PDE-EngCNg ollH DRnxINL RARE. RRl\SIS-S1L1\Dravings\ExhlElts\515-Clay o,ERREDEODU ------.''.— i ,\ \ 1 } E I m s rmp \1 ®t A I8 m , I I '\ *41/10 7 G 3 i' ' ii g§ , • --/_ , c, o i _I I 1 .,I III I lb( A \ \ I 'T?44q..SSSS 12m III�� C8 1 \1 I I I 1 \1 \\„,,, \ I III I� \ II I \ \ II I \ ;I\\\` I� 1 III': I t' Q \1 '1,\ ' \� 11\ 1 II \411 \\ 6. ‘ _. ,n't .' \ , -„,.;:f' \ ,, ,, 00 ,,,,,,.,,,,//::// f ,,,,i'''' //D,ERDIRIER‘95-DIEY RE ERR -�% - ! , i/ '' 4 ge ////,',/,,/,,,;;) �i 28 /: '://,'' /:r I 412' // /. / /;','''' ilia 1 II 1 ?+ , / ° : l/ 3 \' , s 8 ;'; O 2' E t III /22A .. lil itI m a I,'il3 r 4F- m `� p i 'II 11 6 I. I .+ II :9 II CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING THE INCLUSION OF THE CITY FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT IN THE I-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 2- WIDENING PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2-Widening project, scheduled to begin in early 2009, will build an additional lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, reconstruct Benson Road from City Hall south over I-405 and widen Talbot Road between South Renton Village Place and Puget Drive; and WHEREAS, the IS Division and the Transportation Division require conduit to extend Noire the City fiber network south of I-405; and WHEREAS, cost and construction efficiencies will be realized by including this work with the WSDOT I-405 Stage 2 project, since this project will build a new Benson Road bridge and will reconstruct a significant portion of Talbot Road S.; and WHEREAS, the Utility Construction Agreement establishes that this conduit work will be bid separately within the WSDOT Stage 2 project and will be funded by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk arc hereby authorized to execute the Utility Construction Agreement with WSDOT for the g purpose of extending the City fiber network south of I-405. PASSED BY 'THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.13 72:9/17/08:scr 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL REGARDING SUPPORT FOR THE FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT'S FIREFIGHTER I-II TRAINING PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the Washington State Patrol has funds, staffing and materials to provide support for the Fire and Emergency Services Firefighter I-II training program; and WHEREAS, the agreement provides for student textbooks and materials, other course materials and fire training academy instruction from the Washington State Patrol; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to utilize the Firefighter I-II training program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, Noble WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interagency agreement with the Washington State Patrol entitled "WSP No. C090294GSC Interagency Agreement Between State of Washington Washington State Patrol and City of Renton Fire and Emergency Services Department" for the purpose of providing support for the Firefighter I-II training program. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk '4110v 1 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.13 74:9/17/08:scr ,44101 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON Niswe RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING THE SEWER RELOCATION NEAR THUNDER HILLS CREEK AS A PART OF THE I-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 2- WIDENING PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2-Widening project, scheduled to begin in early 2009, will build an additional lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, reconstruct Benson Road from City Hall south over I-405 and widen Talbot Road between South Renton Village Place and Puget Drive; and WHEREAS, the City owns an 18" sanitary sewer line that crosses I-405 near Thunder Now Hills Creek; and WHEREAS, an existing manhole is currently located between Benson Road and I-405 that must be relocated in order to avoid the planned I-405 southbound off-ramp to Talbot Road; and WHEREAS, the Utility Construction Agreement establishes that this relocation work will be bid separately within the WSDOT Stage 2 project, funded by the City and constructed by the design-builder within this project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. 1 rrrrrrrrrror RESOLUTION NO. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the 44400 Utility Construction Agreement with WSDOT for the purpose of extending the City fiber network south of I-405. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1373:9/17/08:scr 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING THE INCLUSION OF THE CITY FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT IN THE I-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 2- WIDENING PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 2-Widening project, scheduled to begin in early 2009, will build an additional lane on I-405 in each direction between SR 167 and SR 169, reconstruct Benson Road from City Hall south over I-405 and widen Talbot Road between South Renton Village Place and Puget Drive; and WHEREAS, the IS Division and the Transportation Division require conduit to extend rr.r the City fiber network south of I-405; and WHEREAS, cost and construction efficiencies will be realized by including this work with the WSDOT 1-405 Stage 2 project, since this project will build a new Benson Road bridge and will reconstruct a significant portion of Talbot Road S.; and WHEREAS, the Utility Construction Agreement establishes that this conduit work will be bid separately within the WSDOT Stage 2 project and will be funded by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Utility Construction Agreement with WSDOT for the purpose of extending the City fiber network south of I-405. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1372:9/17/08:scr 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND CHAPTER 6, STREET AND UTILITY STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) TO PROVIDE FOR HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, ACCESS PERMITS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS PURSUANT TO RCW 47.50. WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to provide regulation and control of vehicular access and connection points of ingress to, and egress from, the state highway system within incorporated areas of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-4-080I, Driveway Design Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances City of Renton, Washington," is hereby amended by adding a new subsection, to read as follows: 8. Driveways Providing Access or Connection To and From the State Highway System: Any driveway providing access or connection to or from the state highway system shall be designed and installed pursuant to code section 4-6- 060F.10. SECTION II. Subsection 4-6-060F, Public Street and Sidewalk Design Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances City of Renton, Washington," is hereby amended by adding a new subsection, to read as follows: 10. Vehicular Access and Connection Points To and From the State Highway System: Now 1 ORDINANCE NO. a. RCW Chapter 47.50 is hereby adopted by reference to provide for the regulation and control of vehicular access and connection points of ingress to and egress from the state highway system within the incorporated areas of the City of Renton. b. Pursuant to the requirements and authority of RCW 47.50, there is hereby adopted by reference the provisions of Chapter 468-51 and Chapter 458-52 of the Washington Administrative Code, together with all future amendments, in order to implement the requirements of Chapter 47.50 RCW. c. At least one copy of each law, rule or regulation adopted hereby is on file with the City Clerk and available for inspection by the public. SECTION III. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2008. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2008. Denis Law, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1500:9/8/08:scr 3 STAFF RECAP COUNCIL MEETING REFERRALS 10/6/2008 MOTIONS REFERRED TO ADMINISTRATION: Information regarding business license request of Valerie Tavenner, owner of Birds For All Occasions, 12030 SE 165th St., Renton, WA 98058, including whether a conforming use in King County. Pietsch Other Requests: none MOTIONS REFERRED TO COUNCIL COMMITTEE: * 1. Request by Valerie Tavenner, owner of Birds For All Occasions, 12030 SE 165th St., Renton, WA 98058, to grant a City business license. Referred to Planning&Development Committee 2. Speeds on Sunset Blvd. SE. Referred to Transportation Committee *The Consent Agenda items were adopted as presented.