Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 03/06/2006 AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL *REVISED* REGULAR MEETING March 6, 2006 Monday, 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Public Works Department Employee Recognition 4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 5. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 6. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 2/27/2006. Council concur. b. Mayor Keolker appoints Kelly Roberts, 2316 SE 21st St., Renton, 98055, to the Advisory Commission on Diversity for a term that expires 12/31/2008. Refer to Community Services Committee. c. City Clerk recommends adoption of an ordinance to finalize the Mike Romano vacation of a portion of Jericho Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St., as all conditions of the vacation approval have been satisfied(VAC-05-005). Council concur. (See 9. for ordinance.) d. City Clerk submits request from Bret Holmes, 32104 2nd Ave. SE,Federal Way, 98023,for a latecomer agreement for sanitary sewer extension along Graham Ave. NE, south of NE 9th St. Refer to Utilities Committee. e. City Clerk submits request from Vineyards Construction,LLC,PO Box 2401, Kirkland,98083, for a latecomer agreement for sanitary sewer extension along NE 7th Pl. at Duvall Pl. NE. Refer to Utilities Committee. f. Hearing Examiner recommends approval,with conditions, of the Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat;ten single-family lots on 1.69 acres located at 3701 Wells Ave. N. (PP-05-115). Council concur. g. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of the Eastside Transportation Partnership(ETP)agreement,an Eastside forum for information sharing, consensus building, and coordination to resolve transportation issues. Annual dues are$500. Council concur. (See 9.a. for resolution.) h. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with the South County Area Transportation Board(SCATBd), a South King County forum for information sharing, coordination, and consensus building to resolve transportation issues. Annual dues are$75. Council concur. (See 9.b. for resolution.) i. Transportation Systems Division requests authorization for a construction contract change order to CAG-05-185,Burnett Linear Park Play Area Renovation,to add a ten-foot wide, multi-use, non-motorized path from S. 5th St. to S. 6th St. in the amount of$35,251.20. Council concur. j. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in the amount of$59,540 with HDR Engineering, Inc. for a bench scale and pilot plant study for Well 5A water treatment improvements. Council concur. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) 7. CORRESPONDENCE 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk(*)may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Community Services Committee: Roosevelt Lewis Appointment to Municipal Arts Commission b. Planning &Development Committee: Airport Related Uses Zoning Text Amendments c. Utilities Committee: Utility Tax Exemption 9. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES *(item c. removed)* Resolutions: a. Eastside Transportation Partnership agreement (see 6.g.) b. South County Area Transportation Board agreement(see 6.h.) Ordinance for first reading: Vacation of portion of Jericho Ave. NE(see 6.c.) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 11. AUDIENCE COMMENT 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION (property acquisition) 13. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Eastside Transportation Association Concept for Regional Transit • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES.&THURS.AT 11:00 AM&9:00 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9:00 AM&7:00 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1:00 PM&9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 6, 2006 Council Chambers Monday,7:00 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN, Council President; TONI NELSON; DAN CLAWSON; COUNCILMEMBERS DENIS LAW; MARCIE PALMER;DON PERSSON. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILWOMAN TERRI BRIERE. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative ATTENDANCE Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN,City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;PETER HAHN,Interim Transportation Systems Director; COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI,Police Department. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Gregg Zimmerman,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator,recognized Public Works: Employee the Planning/Building/Public Works employees nominated and chosen by their Recognition peers to receive 2005 Good Work awards, as follows: Adriann Alexander, Permit Technician; Sherry Lovgren,Office Assistant II;Jason Fritzler,Civil Engineer II; and Donnaann Visneski,Engineering Specialist III. Ms. Visneski was also selected as the 2005 Planning/Building/Public Works Employee of the Year. Mr. Zimmerman then announced that the following Planning/Building/Public Works employees who contributed to the REACT program were awarded the 2005 Good Teamwork Award: Paul Baker, Code Compliance Inspector; Marilyn Kamcheff, Code Compliance Inspector; Patrick Roduin, Office Assistant II; Stacy Tucker, Secretary I; Dustin Walton, Intern; and Bob Arthur, retired Code Compliance Inspector. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included: * Mayor Keolker delivered the 2006 State of the City address, "Building The Center of Opportunity," at a Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce sponsored event on March 1st. The transcript is available for viewing on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us. • The Renton Community Center is hosting a summer part-time job fair on March 11th. * The Transportation Systems Division will hold a public meeting with the North Renton Neighborhood Association on March 9th at the Renton Senior Activity Center to inform the community about traffic and construction issues related to the South Lake Washington Roadway project (The Landing). This meeting is open to all North Renton residents. In addition, information will be presented to the Kennydale Neighborhood Association Board on March 14th. March 6,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 55 AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus,Highlands Community Association Vice President, 1137 Citizen Comment: DeMastus - Harrington Ave. NE,Renton,98056, spoke in support of a utility tax exemption Utility Tax Exemption, Senior for seniors and those with disabilities. She explained that there are over 1,900 &Disabled Residents residents in the Renton Highlands area alone that have an income of$15,000 per year or less and have trouble making ends meet, especially with the increasing cost of utilities, services,property taxes, and food. Ms.DeMastus indicated that a committee of the association has been working on this issue and has presented information to the City in support of helping the elderly and disabled. Councilman Clawson stated that the utility tax exemption issue was discussed at the Utilities Committee meeting last week. He conveyed that the Committee is generally supportive of the idea, and pointed out that the utility tax rate is 6%. Mr. Clawson reported that the Administration is reviewing the possibility of a rebate for those who already qualify for the senior citizen or disabled rate, and will provide more information and a recommendation to the Utilities Committee. Expressing his support for the rebate,he indicated that the Committee will make a recommendation to Council once they have reviewed more detailed information. Citizen Comment: Petersen- Inez Somerville Petersen, 3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N.,#3,Renton,98056, Utility Tax Exemption, Senior reported that the utility tax exemption has been an initiative of the Highlands &Disabled Residents Community Association(HCA),and HCA wants the opportunity to work with the Council on this charitable program that is not only for residents in the Highlands,but for the entire City. Pointing out that the City received$9.8 million last year,and is projected to receive$10.7 million next year in utilities income,Ms. Petersen stated that the maximum amount needed for this program is 2.5%. She relayed that it is the goal of HCA to work with the City using a bottom-up approach, to result in a policy stating that senior or disabled residents who make less than$35,000 per year do not have to pay utility tax. Citizen Comment: Rosemary Quesenberry, 3609 SE 18th Ct., Renton, 98058, reminded Council Quesenberry-Utilities that in 2000, it was she,not the Utilities Committee, that initiated the idea of an Committee Meeting automated payment procedure for utility bills. She also pointed out that the suggestion for a utility tax exemption was originated by residents, and not by the Utilities Committee. Ms. Quesenberry expressed her unhappiness with how the Utilities Committee meeting was conducted on March 2nd, saying it was not reflective of how the meetings of the City Council are run. She noted that the Utilities Committee meeting was abruptly ended, and that at Council meetings,people can make comments and ask questions. Ms. Quesenberry submitted a list of recommendations for conducting a successful meeting. Mayor Keolker stated for the record that Council committee meetings are working committees of the Council, and there is no requirement to take any public testimony at the meetings. She noted that if public testimony is taken, minutes also have to be taken. Councilman Clawson explained that time is limited at committee meetings, and pointed out that at the aforementioned Utilities Committee meeting,public comment was taken for ten minutes beyond the scheduled meeting ending time. He stated that citizens can contact Council or staff with additional comments via e-mail, telephone, and mail. Mr. Clawson also noted the importance of staying on topic, as the committee meeting agendas are publicly announced. He apologized if anyone was offended, and said he appreciated Ms. Quesenberry's constructive comments. March 6,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 56 MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT REGARDING THE MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION APPOINTMENT. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Mayor Appointment: Municipal Arts Keolker's appointment of Roosevelt Lewis to the Municipal Arts Commission Commission for a three-year term expiring 12/31/2008. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilwoman Nelson introduced Mr. Lewis who explained that he has been an artist his entire life, has taught art, and has worked with artists in various capacities and with the SouthEast Seattle Arts Council. He stated that he is happy to be a part of the Municipal Arts Commission, and appreciates the opportunity to serve the City. In response to Council President Corman's inquiry,Mr. Lewis indicated that he is a painter and a wood sculptor. Ms. Nelson noted that there are more openings on the commission, and encouraged those who are interested to apply. Councilwoman Palmer emphasized that Mr. Lewis is a wonderful addition to the commission. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 2/27/2006. Council concur. 2/27/2006 Appointment: Advisory Mayor Keolker appointed Kelly Roberts,2316 SE 21st St.,Renton, 98055, to Commission on Diversity the Advisory Commission on Diversity for a term that expires 12/31/2008. Refer to Community Services Committee. Vacation: Jericho Ave NE, City Clerk recommended adoption of an ordinance to finalize the Mike Romano Romano, VAC-05-005 vacation of a portion of Jericho Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St.,as all conditions of the vacation approval have been satisfied. Council concur. (See page 58 for ordinance.) Latecomer Agreement: City Clerk submitted request from Bret Holmes, 32104 2nd Ave. SE,Federal Holmes, Sewer Extension Way, 98023, for a latecomer agreement for sanitary sewer extension along (Graham Ave NE),LA-06-001 Graham Ave. NE, south of NE 9th St. Refer to Utilities Committee. Latecomer Agreement: City Clerk submitted request from Vineyards Construction,LLC,PO Box 2401, Vineyards Construction, Sewer Kirkland, 98083, for a latecomer agreement for sanitary sewer extension along Extension(NE 7th P1),LA-06- NE 7th Pl. at Duvall Pl. NE. Refer to Utilities Committee. 002 Plat: Victoria Pointe,Wells Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Victoria Ave N, PP-05-115 Pointe Preliminary Plat; ten single-family lots on 1.69 acres located at 3701 Wells Ave. N. Council concur. Transportation: Eastside Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of the Eastside Transportation Partnership Transportation Partnership(ETP)agreement, an Eastside forum for information Agreement sharing, consensus building,and coordination to resolve transportation issues. Annual dues are$500. Council concur. (See page 57 for resolution.) March 6,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 57 SCATBd: Agreement Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with the South County Transportation Board(SCATBd), a South King County forum for information sharing,coordination, and consensus building to resolve transportation issues. Annual dues are$75. Council concur. (See later this page for resolution.) CAG: 05-185,Burnett Linear Transportation Systems Division requested authorization for a construction Park Play Area Renovation, contract change order to CAG-05-185,Burnett Linear Park Play Area Multi-Use Path Renovation, to add a ten-foot wide, multi-use,non-motorized path from S. 5th St. to S. 6th St. in the amount of$35,251.20. Council concur. Utility: Well 5A Water Utility Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the amount Treatment Improvements of$59,540 with HDR Engineering, Inc. for a bench scale and pilot plant study Study, HDR Engineering for Well 5A water treatment improvements. Council concur. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Public Safety Committee Chair Law presented a report recommending Public Safety Committee concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt an ordinance exempting the Human Resources: Police& Police and Fire Chiefs of the City of Renton from civil service. MOVED BY Fire Chiefs Exemption from LAW, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE Civil Service COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning&Development Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Clawson presented a report Committee concurring with the staff recommendation to revise the Medium Industrial(IM) Planning: Airport Related Uses zone to allow the municipal airport and airplane sales and repair as permitted Zoning Text Amendments (IM uses in the IM zone; airport-related and aviation-related uses as accessory uses Zone) in the IM zone; and airplane manufacturing as an accessory use in the IM zone, with a note of exception for the area south of I-405 and north of SW 16th St. Revisions also include deleting airplane sales and repair from the Heavy Industrial zone and deleting municipal airports from the Center Downtown zone. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be prepared for first reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3793 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the Transportation: Eastside agreement for the Eastside Transportation Program. MOVED BY PERSSON, Transportation Partnership SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS Agreement READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3794 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an SCATBd: Agreement agreement with the South County Area Transportation Board. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 3/13/2006 for second and final reading: March 6,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 58 Vacation: Jericho Ave NE, An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Jericho Ave. NE, south of NE 4th Romano, VAC-05-005 St. (Petitioner: Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 3/13/2006. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Corman thanked Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington Council: Retreat for his help in planning for the offsite Council planning meeting on March 8th and 9th. He stated that although the meeting is open to the public,due to the large amount of material that needs to be covered,most likely there will be no time for public comment. Mr. Corman emphasized, however, that Council always wants to hear from the public, and welcomes comments in advance of and following the meeting. He acknowledged the public's interest in the Highlands redevelopment project,and noted that this is the Council's first formal discussion of the matter in quite some time. Planning: Highlands Sub-Area Councilman Persson thanked the Mayor and Council President for mailing a Plan letter pertaining to the Highlands area redevelopment to concerned parties. AUDIENCE COMMENT Inez Somerville Petersen, 3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N.,#3,Renton, 98056, Citizen Comment: Petersen- expressed her disappointment about the lack of response from elected officials Utilities Committee Meeting regarding the concerns of members of the Highlands Community Association. She noted the short amount of time scheduled at the Utilities Committee meeting to discuss the topic of utility tax exemption,and the non- responsiveness when trying to schedule meetings. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 60 MINUTES TO DISCUSS PROPERTY ACQUISITION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 7:56 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:27 p.m. >1 .Ndi Wa.eter—' Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann March 6, 2006 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING March 6,2006 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COUNCIL WORKSHOP WED., 3/08 Annexation; 8:OOam-5:OOpm Regional Transportation; &THURS., 3/09 The Landing Development; 1:30pm-5:OOpm Highlands Redevelopment; Emerging Issues *Renton Technical College, Room C111, Technology Resource Center* COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 3/13 Regional Transportation Projects (Corman) 6:00 p.m. Affecting Renton COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE MON., 3/13 Vouchers; (Persson) 5:00 p.m. Cable Franchise Renewal (briefing only) PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY (Law) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Palmer) UTILITIES (Clawson) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. C.)4 OADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND «� + LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • rVO MEMORANDUM DATE: March 6, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION • "2-1-1" is now the number to call in King County to get connected with a wide range of human services and other community resources through the Crisis Clinic's Community Information Line. The 2-1-1 line is also a good source of information about agencies needing volunteers or accepting donated goods. The information line is operated seven days a week from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. by paid trained staff members who seek to minimize the number of calls needed to get assistance by directing callers to the appropriate service or agency. Specialists in housing, disabilities, and languages other than English are available. ADMINISTRATIVE/JUDICIAL/LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • Mayor Kathy Keolker delivered the 2006 State of the City address, "Building The Center of Opportunity," on March 1st at an event sponsored by the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce. In her third annual address, she spoke of the tremendous performance of our "local" businesses that operate on a global scale --PACCAR and The Boeing Company -- and the economic achievements of the city's big and small businesses. The complete State of the City address is available for viewing on the City's website, www.ci.renton.wa.us. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The Renton Community Center is hosting a summer part-time job fair on Saturday, March 11th, from 10:00 to 11:30 a.m. Staff will be on hand to answer questions and help with the application process. • The Renton City Concert Band will perform at IKEA Performing Arts Center on Thursday, March 23rd, at 7:30 p.m. The concert will feature many American favorites, including folk songs and classics from Lerner and Loewe, Frank Sinatra, and others. Tickets are available by calling 425- 430-6700. PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • In our continuing efforts to inform the community about traffic and construction issues related to the South Lake Washington Roadway project (the Landing), the Transportation Systems Division will hold a public meeting with the North Renton Neighborhood Association at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, March 9th, at the Renton Senior Activity Center. This meeting is open to all North Renton residents. In addition, information will be presented to the Kennydale Neighborhood Association Board on March 14th. 3-44/4 Audience dornrherf e„emary Qucse 6e/Ty Recommendations for Conducting a Successful Meeting •First always have good manners. Inviting contact and manners are a basic expectation. This recommendation is not only for meetings but for daily conduct as well. •Time management is essential to a successful meeting. Understand your time limits and allocate time to discuss the issues provides an opportunity for everyone to learn. Also provide time to include comments and questions from others attending the meeting. Everyone benefits from discussion. •It is important to be knowledgeable about the topics to be discussed. Understanding the issues enhances the meeting. •Engage participates at the meeting. It is an important element to include active participation. Listening to others is just common courtesy. •Professionally concluding a meeting is also recommended. Don't be a dictator. •A successful meeting is a true "meeting of the minds". Oe: eowlC// Mayo/ A mnONED BY _^ CT/COUNCIL Date "'-ado(v COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT March 6, 2006 Municipal Arts Commission: Appointment of Roosevelt Lewis (Referred February 27, 2006) The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Mayor Keolker's appointment of Roosevelt Lewis to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three-year term expiring December 31, 2008. Toni Nelson, Chair Marcie Palmer, Vice Chair Dan Clawson, Member C: Peter Renner,Facilities Director CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL IAl#: � •�j . Submitting Data: For Agenda of: March 6, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/Mayor's Office Staff Contact Kathy Keolker, Mayor Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Advisory Commission on Diversity Appointment: Ordinance Kelly Roberts Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Community Service Application Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to Community Services Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Keolker appoints the following to the Advisory Commission for Diversity for a term expiring on December 31, 2008: Kelly Roberts, 2316 SE 21st Street, Renton, WA, 98055 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm Mayor Keolker's appointment of Kelly Roberts to the Advisory Commission for Diversity for a term expiring on 12/31/08. CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE If you are interested in participating in local government by membership on any of the following City boards, commissions,or committees,please complete this application and return it to: Office of the Mayor City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Check the boards/commissions/committees in which you are interested: ❑ AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE* ❑ PLANNING COMMISSION* ❑ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION* RENTON ADVISORY COMMISSION ON DIVERSITY U HOUSING AUTHORITY* El SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE* ❑ HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE* U SISTER CITY COMMITTEE-CUAUTLA ID BOARD ❑ SISTER CITY COMMITTEE-NISHIWAKI Li ARTS COMMISSION* ❑ TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD ❑ PARK BOARD* *Special membership requirements apply. Visit www.cirenton.wa.us or call 42S-430-6500 for details. Your application will be given every consideration as vacancies occur. -MR_0 MS.0 NAME 7 [2,462l� DATE /4114Y/Ar ADDRESS c335/4 5e v2/ %r 3T / N ZjtQ ZIP CODE 96osTS PHONE: DAY VATS= S/Ycf-OBS NIGHT VoZ5 -4277— %'tS EMAIL ie d eO sr.me..- RENTON RESIDENT? Ye--S IF SO,SINCE WHEN? //9g CITY OF FORMER RESIDENCE 144)9 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND /,d //S 41644 bu j- A,n/ivis r -T/O&) C�O4e/Nti DA i,?-eI6s OCCUPATIONAkeb,r J9* 44€1404 jz,, EMPLOYER '-4,4'A! t C&S OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND O74/ VRS //J its la ii.zeie COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES(organizations/clubs/service groups.etc.) Jl) O7 f4. (44C44 a-4J/T AS' AI-C.X. • 40.• - S ST/NA-S /& 444.Q6/6. (4-04.44/1-‘.1 11.4 Vie 4-66247) REASON FOR APPLYING FOR THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE J ewe #1.40 .T /2v6e7 g,44/Lt/Ly/77 A)IL/4 6- - 4fr6 S-i .-A/SH 74 ,9 z i /N i -t1 l49 ”7 CSN CAN ATTEND DAY MEETINGS? Nd—614//f CAN ATTEND NIGHT MEETINGS? ,CJs y IApplications will be kept on file for one year.If you have questions about serving on a board, commission,or committee,please feel free to contact the Mayor's Office at 425-430-6500. I 050305 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I AI#: ' C . Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 3/6/2006 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk Staff Contact Bonnie Walton, x6502 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Street Vacation Petition for a Portion of Jericho Ave. Correspondence. NE, south of NE 4th St. Ordinance X (Petitioner: Mike Romano, Centurion Development Resolution Services; File No. VAC-05-005) Old Business Exhibits: New Business Minutes of 2/6/2006 Study Sessions Ordinance Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: At the regular Council meeting of February 6, 2006, the City Council held a public hearing to consider a vacation request, submitted by Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services, for a portion of Jericho Ave. NE right-of-way, five feet in width and 286 feet in length, located south of NE 4th St. The Council approved the vacation request, subject to an easement in favor of the City being retained over the entire right-of-way for sidewalk, street lighting, and utilities. Council also waived compensation given the benefits that will be recognized by the City from the associated street improvements. No other amounts are due, and all conditions of the vacation approval have been satisfied. Therefore, the ordinance can be adopted to finalize the vacation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Finalize the street vacation by adopting the ordinance cc: Karen McFarland Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 6, 2006 Council Chambers Monday, 7:00 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN,Council President; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER; COUNCILMEMBERS TERRI BRIERE;DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI NELSON. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER,Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; KAREN MCFARLAND, Engineering Specialist; LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON, COMMANDER TIM TROXEL, COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI, and COMMANDER KEVIN MILOSEVICH, Police Department. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Chief of Police Garry Anderson announced that Officer Craig Sjolin,Police Police: Employee Recognition Services Specialist Holly Trader, and Officer Steven Ritchie were each selected by their peers and honored as an Employee of the Quarter in 2005. Police Services Specialist Jacqueline Thomas, the Employee of the Fourth Quarter, was also named Employee of the Year. Chief Anderson then presented the Meritorious Service Medal to Officer Clay Deering, who on 8/4/2005,entered a burning house and rescued an elderly resident. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Vacation: Jericho Ave NE, accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker opened the public hearing Romano, VAC-05-005 to consider the petition to vacate a portion of Jericho Ave. NE right-of-way, five feet in width and 286 feet in length, located south of NE 4th St. (Petitioner: Mike Romano, Centurion Development Services, on behalf of property owner Norris Homes, Inc.) Karen McFarland, Engineering Specialist, reported that 100% of the abutting property owners have signed the vacation petition, and there are no City-owned or outside agency facilities in the right-of-way. Explaining that the petitioner plans to use the area in the proposed Jericho Plat development, Ms. McFarland pointed out that the vacation will benefit the public by improving traffic flow and safety, and will provide better public transit access by allowing a bus pullout at the intersection of NE 4th St. and Jericho Ave. NE. Currently, the existing right-of-way is five feet wider than the City requires, and the developer has been working with City staff to improve Jericho Ave. NE beyond the code requirements to a modified collector street standard. Continuing, Ms. McFarland stated that although King County Assessor records and the Plat Certificate provided by the title company neglected to show the area of this vacation request as right-of-way, City staffs overall final plat review process showed this right-of-way as an area that was to be abandoned. She relayed the staff request that an easement for sidewalk, street lighting,and utilities be retained in the subject area. Ms. McFarland explained that since the City acquired the street through the 1998 East Renton Plateau Annexation, there were no original acquisition costs. The vacation area is unimproved and City funds have not been expended for its February 6,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 26 maintenance. Therefore, staff recommends that compensation not be charged since the easement will provide the City with all rights necessary for the City's intended use of the area,and the City will benefit from the street improvements associated with Jericho Plat. In conclusion,Ms. McFarland stated that staff recommends approval of the vacation request, and waiver of the compensation. In response to Councilman Persson's inquiry regarding the bus pullout,Ms. McFarland explained that throughout the plat review process,the vacation area was already shown to be a part of the Jericho Plat and not right-of-way. Thus, the bus pullout has already been planned. Mike Romano,Centurion Development Services, 22617 8th Dr. SE,Bothell, 98021, noted that the vacation proposal is holding up the recording of the final plat. He explained that the original preliminary plat map showed the area as a road easement, and therefore it was considered to be a part of the plat until discovered by City staff to be right-of-way. Mr. Romano encouraged Council to approve the vacation so that the project can move forward as originally approved by Council. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VACATION REQUEST SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY BEING RETAINED OVER THE ENTIRE RIGHT- OF-WAY FOR SIDEWALK, STREET LIGHTING, AND UTILITIES,AND COUNCIL WAIVE COMPENSATION GIVEN THE BENEFITS THAT WILL BE RECOGNIZED BY THE CITY FROM THE ASSOCIATED STREET IMPROVEMENTS. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Linda Herzog,Interim Assistant to the CAO,reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included: * The Mayor's Day of Planting is scheduled for April 22nd. This year's project will include the replacement of 26 trees along Williams Ave. S. and Houser Way S., with the help of volunteers through the Neighborhood Program. * The Renton Community Foundation Circle of Giving donated$1,000 to the Recreation Scholarship Program. * The Washington State Department of Transportation is currently installing a safety fence on the SW 43rd St. overpass over SR-167 near Valley Medical Center. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilman Clawson, item 7.c. was removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 1/23/2006. Council concur. 1/23/2006 Community Services: Marine Community Services Department requested approval of the annual roster of Engineering Annual consultants chosen to provide Pier, Dock and Wharf Work; River Bank Consultant Roster Stabilization; Bridge Work; and Site Inventories and Assessments, Suitability CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON VACATING A PORTION OF JERICHO AVENUE NE, SOUTH OF NE 4t" STREET. (MIKE ROMANO, CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SVCS.; VAC 05-005) WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of Jericho Avenue NE, south of NE 4th Street, was filed with the City Clerk on December 23, 2005, and that petition was signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3787, passed on January 9, 2006, set February 6, 2006, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described portion of Jericho Avenue NE, to wit: 1 ORDINANCE NO. (The West 5 feet of the East 10 feet of the South 286.45 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington) See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein is hereby vacated subject to a sidewalk, street lighting, and utility easement over, across, under and on all that part described above in favor of the City. This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining sidewalks, street lighting, utilities, and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto. The City may also construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is subject to the following terms and conditions: That a utility easement be retained over the above-described right-of-way, with the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated, with the City's approval, at the sole cost of the developer; and That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, and their heirs and successors in interest and assigns. SECTION II. No compensation is required for this street vacation. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. 2 ORDINANCE NO. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1244:2/10/06 3 Jericho Ave NE Street Vacation Exhibit A N NE 4th Street44. 5' >,/,( 30' 30' i , i i . , i i • ' W tD ' Z 00 ' N � 3 a 0 � s II NM G V L r'1 0 75 150 1 :900 ♦®yTechnical Services Planning/Building/Public Works K. McFarland O Jan. 30. 2006 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL IAI#: C • e/ ' Submitting Data: For Agenda of: March 6, 2006 Dept/Div/Board. AJLS/City Clerk Staff Contact Bonnie Walton, City Clerk, x6502 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Latecomer's Agreement Request for Sanitary Sewer Correspondence.. Extension along Graham Ave. NE, south of NE 9th St. Ordinance (Bret Holmes, Petitioner) File: LA-06-001 Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Latecomer's Agreement Request with Exhibits Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to Utilities Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Bret Holmes, 32104 2nd Ave. SE, Federal Way, WA 98023, requests a latecomer's agreement for a sanitary sewer extension along Graham Ave. NE, south of NE 9th St. The Planning/Building/Public Works department has verified sufficiency of the petition, the property ownership, cost figures, legal descriptions and maps. The latecomer's agreement application fee of$1,000 has been received. The total cost estimate submitted is $86,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether to grant preliminary approval for the Graham Ave. NE latecomer's agreement request for a period of one year, and authorize staff to forward the preliminary assessment roll to the City Clerk for notification of affected property owners. cc: Karen McFarland,Utility Systems Div.,x7209 Reference: RMC:Title IX,Chapter 4 February 20, 2006 LA-06-00/ Cli?OF RENTON Bret Holmes FEB 2 2 2006 32104 2"d Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY GERMS oFFICE Day Phone#425 687-6876 t ; v Gi m u k Fax No. 425 687-5550 TO: Mayor and City Council C/o City Clerk City of Renton 1005 South Grady Way, 7ty Floor Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Holmes Family Sanitary Sewer Extension Renton Highlands HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL: On behalf of Bret Holmes I respectfully request a latecomer agreement be drawn up so that adjacent properties will be required to share in the cost of the Holmes Family Sanitary Sewer Extension that was required by City Code to be installed to serve the above reference development. The properties that will benefit in the future from the Sewer addition are located in the newly Park Terrace Annexation and as shown on the attached vicinity map. Attached hereto are the estimated cost data and inventory for the installation, the legal description of Bret Holmes property and the benefited properties. Upon Administrative acceptance of my application, I will submit the applicable processing fee upon request. Sincerely, - /t,e/f te;-PfThi Bret Holmes February 20, 2006 Bret Holmes 32104 2nd Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Day Phone#425 687-6876 Fax No. 425 687-5550 TO: Mayor and City Council C/o City Clerk City of Renton 1005 South Grady Way, 7ty Floor Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Holmes Family Sanitary Sewer Extension Renton Highlands Here are the names and addresses of the affected people of the sewer project: Bret & Alison Holmes 855 Graham Ave NE Renton, WA 98059 TAX#: 427920-0130 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT: 5 BLOCK: 2 LESHS CHURCH PARK ADD Attached Vicinity Map#: Developer Property The above party will not be included in the late comer's fee. The following property owners will be included in the late comer's fee: Jesse&Marisa Griffin 859 Graham Ave NE Renton, WA 98059 TAX#:4279200140 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT: 6 BLOCK: 2 LESHS CHURCH PARK ADD Attached Vicinity Map#: 1 Jackie Rainer 863 Graham Ave NE Renton, WA 98059 TAX#:4279200150 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT: 7 BLOCK: 2 LESHS CHURCH PARK ADD Attached Vicinity Map#: 2 Jeffery Johnson 4911 NE 9th ST Renton, WA 98059 TAX#:4279200160 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT: 8 BLOCK: 2 LESHS CHURCH PARK ADD Attached Vicinity Map#: 3 Harmon H. 5003 NE 9th St Renton, WA 98059 TAX#: 1023059328 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 102305 328 N 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LY E OF E MGN OF 141ST AVE SE LESS E 165 FT&LESS CO ROAD Attached Vicinity Map#: 4 ESTIMATED COST DATA AND INVENTORY #3 Estimated Cost Data ant) FC .'OTENTIAL LATECOMER RECOVER'. inventory for Improvements SUBJECT: CITY PROJECT NUMBERS: WTR- WWP- PROJECT NAME:f}dbhtS fuh,t v.Sg1,14ary Seltier ec{eAStCp1 Swp- TRO- f TED- TO: City of Renton FROM: B re T /40Ih eS Plan Review Section efAlh e. I— Planning/Building/Public Works 3?.1()L( a"`t Ave 41i/ 1055 South Grady Way,6th Floor Peden,I 1,l4_// I L'A. /170"1-3 Renton, WA 98055 DATE: Pe b 2x1 xo06 Per the request of the City of Renton,the following information is furnished concerning costs for improvements proposed to be installed for the above-referenced project. WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Length Size Type L.F.of " WATERMAIN L.F.of WATERMAIN L.F.of " WATERMAIN L.F.of " WATERMAIN EACH of " GATE VALVES EACH of GATE VALVES EACH of " GATE VALVES EACH of " FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES $ (Cost of Fire Hydrants must be listed separately) $ Engineering Design Costs $ City Permit Fees $ Washington State Sales Tax $ TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM $ SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS: STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Length Size Type Length Size Type 300 L.F.of $u " T vC SEWER MAIN L.F.of " STORM LINE L.F.of " SEWER MAIN L.F.of " STORM LINE L.F.of " SEWER MAIN L.F.of " STORM LINE a EACH of 5 q " DIAMETER OF MANHOLES EA of " STORM INLET EA of " STORM CATCHBASIN EA of " STORM CATCHBASIN Engineering Design Costs S V000Engineering Design Costs S City Permit Fees a 2060 City Permit Fees $ Washington State Sales Tax S Washington State Sales Tax $ (Sewer Stub—line between sewer main and private property line) S 76,00 Q TOTAL COST FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM $ VGA DU 0 TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM $ STREET IMPROVEMENT: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement and Street Lighting). SIGNALIZATION: (Including Eng.Design Costs,City Permit Fees,WA State Sales Tax). STREET LIGHTING: (Including Eng.Design Costs,City Permit Fees,WA State Sales Tax) Brief- H-01 Ise aO -375-13!i - Y3: 7(c-0 i - Print signatory name (day phone#) (SIGNATURE) (Signatory must be authorized agent or owner of subject development) LATECOMER AGREEMENT VICINITY MAP � ii ? NE 9T" STREET o !Jai • \ . iQ ,DEVELOPER PROPERTY I N\\\ BENEFITED PROPERTIES PROPOSED GRAHAM .STREET - - SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION l / /A DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY - K- LATECOMER BOUNDARY EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 0 EXISTING MANHOLES 50 100 200 SCALE: 1" = 100' CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I AI#: • e • Submitting Data: For Agenda of: March 6, 2006 Dept/Div/Board. AJLS/City Clerk Staff Contact Bonnie Walton, City Clerk, x6502 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Latecomer's Agreement Request for Sanitary Sewer Correspondence.. Extension along NE 7th Place at Duvall Pl. NE Ordinance (Vineyards Construction, LLC, Petitioner) Resolution File: LA-06-002 Old Business Exhibits: New Business Latecomer's Agreement Request with Exhibits Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to Utilities Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Cliff Williams of Vineyards Construction, LLC,P.O. Box 2401 Kirkland, WA 98083,requests a latecomer's agreement for sanitary sewer installation along NE 7th Pl. at Duvall Pl. NE. The Planning/Building/Public Works Department has verified sufficiency of the petition, the property ownership, cost figures, legal descriptions and maps. The latecomer's agreement application fee of$1,000 has been received. The total cost estimate submitted is $72,175.65. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Determine whether to grant preliminary approval for the NE 7th Place latecomer's agreement request for a period of one year, and authorize staff to forward the preliminary assessment roll to the City Clerk for notification of affected property owners. cc: Karen McFarland,Utility Systems Div.,x7209 Reference: RMC:Title IX,Chapter 4 ineyards Construction,, LLC P.O. Box 2401 Kirkland WA, 98083 CITY OF RENTON February 21, 2006 FEB 2 3 2000 RECEI Mayor and City Council CITY CLERICS � c/o City Clerk OFFICE Municipal Building 1055 Grady Way Renton WA, 98055 SUBJECT: PARK TERRACE SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION—LOT 6 NE 7TH PL AT DUVALL PL NE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL: On behalf of Vineyards Construction, LLC, I respectfully request a latecomer agreement be drawn up so that adjacent properties will be required to share in the cost of the Park Terrace Sanitary Sewer Extension—Lot 6 which we understand is required to be installed by City Code as part of our single family building permit for Lot 6. We request that the cost share be assessed on the basis of an equal cost per each single-family lot benefited. The properties that will benefit in the future from the sanitary sewer extension are located along NE 7th Place as shown on the attached vicinity map. Please note that Lot 6 will be serviced off the existing sewer in Duvall PINE. Attached hereto are the estimated cost data and inventory for the installation, the legal description of the Vineyards Construction, LLC properties and the Tax Parcel Numbers of the benefited properties. Please note per City instructions, the construction work will include a new overlay for the full street pavement width within the construction zone. Under Administrative acceptance of my application, I will submit the applicable processing fee up request. If you have any questions, please contact me at 206 714-7161. Yours truly, / f 1 /1// //1/1;" / Cliff ildiams, PE VP, Manager of Engineering Attachments Vineyards Construction, LLC P.O. Box 2401 Kirkland WA, 98083 February 21, 2006 PARK TERRACE SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION—LOT 6 NE 7th PL at DUVALL PL NE LIST OF BENEFITED PROPERTIES PARCEL NUMBER 6649500040 6649500050 6649500060 6649500180 6649500190 6649500200 6649500210 6649500220 - Print Map Page Page 1 ot 1 * King County Home News Services Comments Search Parcel Map and Data I I ‘ 1 e F 6649500120 , 6649500080 1 6649500010 1 /66950a110 / , ,., __----I--- 1 I i ....-- ^ \ , 9506640020 , 6649500016—___. 1 , t-- , 6649500030 1 uj f , iN Q1 ; 'Ck+ tiJ j I Ps,7) '•. 9500060 / i > < i i 6649500159 -..„. I 664515C1CM, 6649.s0004o i i / o -– _ -- lt--/ 1__ SE 121ST_ST: i 6649500160 ' 1 [ ____ -– 6649500186, 1 i1 6649500190 fol. I 6649500170 6649500220 ! I 21d 1 : I 6649500200 I 1 ; - 6649500230 le . _ i :--- 1023059080 fel 2006 16mankinintiv--- 081.8.111811141 http://wwvv5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 2/23/06 PARK TERRACE SEWER EXTENSION - LOT 6 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Item Description Estimated Qty Unit Unit Price Total Sanitary Sewer-Schedule I 1 Mobilization 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 2 Connect to Existing Manhole on NE 7th PL 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 8" PVC Pipe 295 LF $49.00 $14,455.00 4 6"PVC Pipe 175 LF $46.00 $8,050.00 4 48"Sanitary Sewer Manhole 3 EA $3,500.00 $10,500.00 6 Sawcut up to 4"Depth 950 LF _ $3.25 $3,087.50 7 Remove Asphalt 6'Wide 226 SY $6.00 $1,356.00 8 2"Cold Patching 25 Ton $110.00 $2,750.00 9 2"Class B for Asphalt Replacement 25 Ton $115.00 $2,875.00 10 2"Overlay 630 SY $8.50 $5,355.00 11 4"CSTC for Asphalt Replacement 50 Ton $16.00 $800.00- 12 Raise Manholes to Final Grade 3 EA $300.00 $900.00 13 Traffic Control 1 LS $2,800.00 $2,800.00 14 Flush, Test and TV Inspection 295 LF $1.50 $442.50 15 Sewer Pipe Zone Export to lots 250 TCY $3.00 $750.00 Not in total 16 Street Cleaning - as required 0 HRS $115.00 $0.00 17 Straw Bales by Hand - as required 0 EA $15.50 $0.00 18 Straw Mulch Blown Per Bale-as required 0 EA $15.50 $0.00 19 Select Trench Backfill- if required 1400 TON $13.50 $18,900.00 20 Sewer Trench Export- if required 930 TCY $16.50 $15,345.00 *Backfill with native material Subtotal $63,121.00 Sales Tax 8.80% $5,554.65 • Total Sanitary Sewer $68,675.65 21 Engineering and Survey Services $3,500.00 22 Permits $2,000.00 Total $72,175.65 Page 1 ParkTerraceLot6.xls PARK TERRACE SEWER EXTENSION—LOT 6 Legal Description Lots 4, 5, 6, 18, 9, 20, 21 and 22, Park Terrace Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 65, of Plats, pages 18 and 19, in King County. PARK TERRACE DIV/S/ON NO. / SECT/ON /O, TWP. 23 N. RGE. SE.,W.M. M/NISH, WEBB f(/NE COUNTY , WASN//VTON f ASSOC/AYES SHEET Z • 0f;2 I fi.: Cnh,Sec./0 I3-s :.� /40 TN AVE SE. { . CO3, Mon. :.5/O.sf __ _ --I.. .e-S ci rte�N.e _ - /7/.ai Se./,ec::/R-4.,-5 • 75.00 75.00 .{tTJ 00 . •• v.$ .W.11, 70:00 ,o..'•+0 11 o. • 4•AQ p� !O• 30. }c �. F:1..: I r o \ O :.D k q 2 ti 3 a:: o Z2 23 ro y k w 4 hwN 13 75.0, 700 '' • 7f-7S q 7[.00: •15.00 /27.1'.. .-.'77.11 y ! ''/27.00 .00 W \V O....: : h 41 2/ pQ r ::2X!1,5!7' ' .c ss./f r ]{� /27.00. • r... \ •y.. . „/ • N'0'Oe Y7'f k: �.1'.; A ..-.�`Fi^ •,j,� 3' ` /mit- 1 ... ). .. a '_ A N' �as7biJi' ~/�� tz: 20.. •: _, a. Md`7�` '`.�ji u. 4, 1: /it.27 •`- • ''4`Z • SO S. i.4.. 11 y1 -• •-- w: a ♦y 11kC 11.8 - . v k v 1'q ./9 .v 51 14:. 1.:' � . '4* 0 \ ,ti, fs `-'•`1;(:NRV?"re. s' ^'e7%!OI` N. 11','•7✓' :' • / } • p w to4 �" ,.sI,*" ."`,"meor,"• /8 .i' `, y.•6 ► 11 So a a '':�f h e P • 1 "-"4.,_•'. V.-.2.-____-".- "38TH AVE•,° S.E. ..Y ,,:,°1 0 ��.11 ,,%%,:, /tl.S1 — ::.N/e•�I i ,e \1 1S P ' ti F b•00'tf-6 4:t $ L 11 0 _ •0) • 1 11 00 "1 w •w . ...... 11. J.... 4Z e ‘ -. x_,. re,. e J• 1,0' S. . a. �-,_ 6 <ti 1 . '.0'7� ._.o /6 a /7 y /3 , ":"&.. /4 a a 'I • N • ,P ` 'L,• /le./7 - f0.00 70.00 w .__ -. • 5 CAL E : /-_ SO" /``: i// Lr%yam w -x/875 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: rQ . i. Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 3/6/2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Hearing Examiner Staff Contact Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat Ordinance File No. LUA-05-115, ECF,PP Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Study Sessions Legal Description and Vicinity Map Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat was published on February 7, 2006. The appeal period ended on February 21, 2006. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined on page 7 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. Conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat with conditions as outlined in the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh February 7,2006 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT: Robert E. West Hi Point Development 3904 Park Ave N Renton, WA 98056 OWNERS: Steven B.Altringer Ronald F. Furrer 3701 Wells Ave N Renton,WA 98056 Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA 05-115, ECF,PP LOCATION: 3701 Wells Ave N SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval for a 10-lot subdivision of a 1.69-acre site intended for the development of single-family detached units. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on January 17,2006. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the January 24, 2006 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday,January 24, 2006, at approximately 9:01 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Neighborhood Detail Map application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Preliminary Plat Plan Exhibit No.4: Proposed Offsite Storm Drainage System Improvements Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-115,ECF,PP February 7, 2006 Page 2 Exhibit No. 5: Zoning Map Exhibit No.6: Existing Conditions Plan Exhibit No. 7: Street Width Modification The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Keri Weaver, Senior Planner,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant proposes to subdivide a 1.69-acre site into 10 lots for single-family residences. Three single-family residences and their accessory structures were present on the site and are currently in the process of being removed. A stormwater bioswale is proposed to be located at the west end of the site adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard. The site is zoned R-8. The net density is 7.7 dwelling units per acre after the required deduction for public right-of-way along the full extension of N 37th Street from Wells Ave N to Lake Washington Boulevard. All lots meet the requirements for lot size,width,depth, setbacks and height of buildings. All lots would be oriented towards the extension of N 37th Street and would have access to that road from individual driveways. North 37th Street will be constructed through the plat and a modification has been approved by the City to allow this road to be reduced to 42 feet in width. The applicant will be required to provide sidewalk,curb and gutter as well as 5-feet of landscaping along all portions of N 37th Street that are included within the development. It is being recommended that the applicant construct a fence to separate the developed half street portion of N 37`h Street from the private easement that serves the existing lots to the south. A drainage report was submitted which proposes a bioswale along the frontage of Lake Washington Boulevard with connection of treated runoff to the existing storm drain system in Lake Washington Boulevard. Since the site drains into Lake Washington, onsite detention is not required. The Offsite Analysis indicates that the downstream system would not be considered adequate to receive flows from 25-year storm event. The applicant will be required to provide a series of offsite drainage improvements including repair and relaying of pipes along Lake Washington Boulevard and redirection of most stormwater flows to the north and south. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated with 6 mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. Fire,Transportation and Park Mitigation Fees have been imposed for this plat. The site is located within the Renton School District and they have indicated that they can handle the proposed 4 additional students. The Examiner inquired as to why the fence was being installed separating the public road from the easement. It seems like an odd sequence. Ms. Weaver stated that it was for the safety of people passing through on N 37th and also an attempt to give some protection to the homeowners on the south side who will continue to use the private easement. The pavement on the full width section of N 37th will taper and continue in the half-street portion. There could be confusion with people driving on N 37th and for people turning into N 37th Street. The east side of the easement is proposed to be fenced. Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-115, ECF,PP February 7, 2006 Page 3 Robert West, Hi Point Development, 3904 Park Avenue N.,Renton, WA 98056 stated that he was retained by the property owners, Mr. Furrer and Mr.Altringer to act as developer for this project. Regarding the gate that was proposed for the west side of the 25-foot extension,N 37th, originally they had been asked by the City to have that gated. It was incorporated into the plans for preliminary approval, then a change was made by the ERC and they proposed that there not be a gate. Their position is they will do whatever the City requires. He further commented that Ms. Weaver indicated that staff stated that full improvements would be made south of the road south of proposed Lots 1 and 2 and east of proposed Lot 8. It is his understand that it was not their intent to put full improvements on property that they do not own. The existing easement on Lot 8 has been vacated by action by the City Council. It has been paid for and the transaction is completed. Steve B.Altringer,PO Box 2903, Renton,WA 98056 stated that he has been a city resident for almost 30 years. He has lived on this property since March 1996. He believes it is the right time for this property to be developed, it will be a great asset for Kennydale and the City of Renton. Quality homes will be built with this project. He feels that there have been some problems with storm drainage in the past and with this development they will be clearing up a lot of those past problems. Shailesh Tatu, Civil Engineer, Infrastructure Consulting Corp., 1082 Kirkland Avenue NE, Ste. B,Renton,WA 98056 stated that under existing conditions,the storm water coming down the slopes enters the storm system into a structure that allows the flow across the railroad and down to the lake. There are some things with that drainage system that makes it substandard, it will not convey the 25-year flow without flooding. The City also shows a pipe that goes north to a structure with a 12-inch pipe that goes to the lake. That pipe is obstructed in a couple of places. They propose to excavate the pipe in those two locations and clear the obstructions and make the pipe work correctly. They also intend to put an elbow in the pipe to the west so that water may not flow that direction, the downstream system cannot handle the load. They will also construct a pipe south from the frontage of the property and connect to the existing system to the south, which will convey to the lake. They will be creating three ways for the water to get to the lake and in that process take care of the existing problems. Sandra Spelman, 3632 Lake Washington Boulevard N,Renton,WA 98056 stated that her major concern is that once the project is developed,they will lose access to Wells Street from her house. Fire, ambulances, delivery trucks and garbage trucks will not be able to get into her area. It is impossible to make the turn in from the west side because of the steepness of the bank and the narrowness of the driveways. All these vehicles currently come in from the east side. There is a fence that goes across their easement(west of proposed Lot 10 and south of 37th). They would like to request that the fence be replaced with a gate that could be opened, not locked, by vehicles using the road. There was further concern about the erosion plan,not only after the homes are constructed, but during the development. An oil tank was dug up from the house directly behind her and that caused some major mudflow. There was a lot of mud in their driveway and carport due to that activity. When the actual grading begins, she is concerned that the mudflow will get worse. The initial report recommended that no work be done on Sunday, and yet they were out there Sunday at 8:15 am tearing down houses. Construction vehicles and workers using her driveway to get to their sites,this is going to damage their driveway very quickly. She would like to see that activity terminated immediately. Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-115,ECF, PP February 7, 2006 Page 4 What does the City plan on changing in order to improve the traffic flow? Sally Rochelle, 3626 Lake Washington Boulevard N.,Renton, WA 98056 stated that her lot is very high and she is concerned that her easement is not a gravel road,but a blacktop roadway. The eaves of her garage hang out over the easement. There is a very difficult alleyway to maneuver,it is a sharp turn off of Lake Washington Boulevard,she does not believe that Fire Trucks could get up that way and then with the fence it will be even more difficult. It seems that there needs to be some kind of barrier between their easement and the new 25-foot roadway,however it is very difficult for them to get out of their street. Her main concern is the quantity of the traffic. Edie Hamilton, 3714 Lake Washington Boulevard,Renton,WA 98056 stated that she is concerned about the stormwater,even though the bulk of the water runs towards the west,it also comes across and down her driveway to the west. She wanted to make sure that the developer addressed that issue to the north side of the property. Neil Watts,Development Services Director, City of Renton stated that the drainage is a little unusual, sites of this size normally will have both water quality treatment and detention,however, sites that can directly discharge to the lake do not require detention. Part of the challenge with the requirements for direct discharge is that capacity must be shown,not only for the existing basin but for full build out in the basin. This is an excellent opportunity to solve some of the problems that exist with the system that runs directly west of the site,that line is currently substandard and does not handle the drainage very well. It also provides opportunities to correct some deficiencies in the public system on Lake Washington Boulevard to the north. There was a gate at one point that was to block access to the west. The original proposal did not have a public right-of-way going west in front of Lots 5,6,and 7,that was proposed as a private easement road. Public Works required that this be dedicated as a public right-of-way. The request for the gate came from that original proposal and was a Fire Department response,they are used to seeing gates on private access easements. In this particular case,there is a need for a public street and there is no need for a gate across a public street. ERC originally had concerns with a driveway that close to a public street. People trying to turn into N 37th to one of the new lots would accidentally drive into the driveway and cause confusion and the property owners would not like a variety of people driving in their driveways and trying to turn around. The intent of that fence was to delineate a private driveway versus a public street. It was not the intent to fence those properties off from access to N 37t. There is no objection from the City to have access from the private property to N 37t. The fence could have gates with allow access to N 37th• The Examiner stated that Ms. Rochelle and Ms. Spelman could work with the City to find a better solution than a fence. It seems that a fence will not work very safely or efficiently along Lake Washington Boulevard. In the same manner, if you put a fence at the jog in the road,people coming up the extension will not see cars coming. Mr.Watts stated that there are different fences,and this one would not necessarily have to be 6-feet high.The preference would be for the property owners to work out something mutually advantageous. Erosion control is always a challenge with construction and especially this time of year. Erosion control measures remain in place through the building of the homes and they try to be active in inspecting the area and the Code Enforcement group to enforce the laws. Times of construction again can be a problem with communications between the various levels of construction workers. The best solution in this case is to call "911",tell them that this is a non-emergency call,the police can go to the site,document what is going on and the Code Enforcement group can then take appropriate action. Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-115, ECF,PP February 7, 2006 Page 5 Mr. Altringer stated that they had no problem with a gate at the jog,there has always been a gate there that garbage and emergency vehicles have used,that is fine if a gate stays there. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at approximately 10:02 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS&RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Robert E.West,Hi Point Development, filed a request for a Preliminary Plat approval. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 3701 Wells Avenue N. The parcel actually runs from Well Avenue N(on the east)to Lake Washington Boulevard N on the west. North 37th Street if extended westward(which is proposed in this plat)would run through the middle of the parcel. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of detached single-family homes,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family- 8 dwelling units/acre). 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5140 enacted in December 1969. 9. The subject site is approximately 1.69 acres in size. The parcel is a flattened T-shape that is approximately 480 feet long(east to west)and ranges from approximately 110 feet wide to 220 feet wide. 10. The parcel slopes downward toward Lake Washington Boulevard from approximately 110 feet to 40 feet. The parcel has an average grade of approximately 12%. While there are some steeper slopes in the middle of the site, none of the slopes are protected. There are no critical areas on the subject site. 11. Three homes on the site are in the process of being removed. 12. The applicant proposes to maintain three of the fourteen trees found on the site. The remaining vegetation consists of lawn grass and shrubs. Most vegetation would be removed to accommodate right-of-way,building pads and driveways. Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-115,ECF,PP February 7,2006 Page 6 13. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site in ten(10)lots with North 37 Street dividing the plat into a north portion and a south portion. Proposed Lots 1 to 7(in east to west order)would be located on the north side of the street. Proposed Lots 8,9 and 10 (also east to west)would be located on the south side of North 37th Street. The lots are all rectangular with the exception of Proposed Lot 7. Lot 7 is located at the western end of the plat where Lake Washington Boulevard cuts a slight angle across the property. The proposed lots will range in size from approximately 4,725 square feet to 7,134 square feet. 14. The applicant would extend N 37th Street across the plat connecting Wells Avenue and Lake Washington Boulevard with a public street. The new street would vary in width. Preexisting development south of that roadway both east and west of Proposed Lots 8, 9 and 10 constrain the alignment of North 37th Street. An Administrative modification allows the width to vary from a 42-foot right-of-way east of Proposed Lots 4 on the north and 10 on the south to a narrower 25-foot half street profile west of there. The actual alignment and transitions will be determined after working with neighbors in that vicinity(see below). 15. Two third-party parcels,addressed as 3632 and 3626 Lake Washington Boulevard,are generally south of Proposed Lots 5, 6,and 7. Those two lots use an access easement to gain access to their lots. That access easement runs parallel to what would be the new public street,N. 37th. While those lots are located close to Lake Washington Boulevard,most access to those lots occurs from Wells Avenue(east of the lots)due to topographic constraints on the west. In order to both protect and delineate that private easement staff recommended that the easement to these homes be separated from the new roadway(N 37th Street)by a fence. The fence would run from the vicinity of Proposed Lot 10 toward Lake Washington Boulevard. Those property owners asked that a gate be provided. 16. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 4 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. 17. The density for the plat would be 7.7 dwelling units per acre after subtracting the acreage dedicated to roadways. 18. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately 100 trips. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or approximately 10 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 19. The applicant proposes providing a bioswale that would be located along Lake Washington Boulevard in the western end of the plat. Since the site drains very quickly toward Lake Washington no detention is required. There have been flooding problems in the area and the current system does not handle 25- year storms. An analysis revealed blockages in the storm sewer system downstream of the subject site. Stormwater flows will be improved by fixing the line,expanding it where necessary and adding a secondary system that handles larger overflows. 20. Sewer service and water service will be provided by the City. 21. There was concern about traffic and turning movements from the plat to Lake Washington Boulevard. Staff noted that the additional traffic is acceptable although drivers will have to accommodate the topography. Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.:LUA-05-115, ECF, PP February 7, 2006 Page 7 CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The subdivision will provide additional housing choices in the Kennydale area of the City where urban services are available. 2. Stormwater will be treated before it leaves the site but the property's proximity to the lake exempts it from actual detention if downstream capacity is adequate. The stormwater analysis identified the problems with the drainage line that have been creating problems in the area. Those problems will be addressed as this plat is developed. The development should not tax the system or exacerbate existing problems. 3. The plat will add to the tax base of the City helping to offset some of its impacts. In addition,mitigation fees will help offset impacts on transportation, fire and parks services. 4. The locations of the new road and the existing parallel easement for access to parcels located south of the plat create an odd juxtaposition of roadways. The easement will remain private but merge with the public road on the east. The two roads will run parallel to each other and be immediately abutting one another. Defining their relative extents will be necessary but could create roadway hazards or confusion. A fence could block sight lines and an improperly located gate could create congestion, backup or blocking problems along the public portion of the roadway. It probably would be best if they could be merged and appropriate access provided to the two third party lots in the process but that may not be possible. The applicant, staff and the abutting property owners will be required to work together to create a solution that is effective and safe. 5. In conclusion,the proposed plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions noted below. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant, staff and the abutting property owners will be required to work together to create a solution that is effective and safe for the transition and separation of the private easement and North 37th Street. The applicant shall be responsible for any fence or other transitional structures,pavement or markings as determined by staff. 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non-Significance— Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on December 28, 2005. 3. The applicant shall provide a detailed landscape plan that shows proposed landscaping for all street frontages and the bioswale area. Landscaping shall be consistent with the requirements of RMC 4-2-110. A 5-foot landscape buffer is required along the frontages of Lake Washington Blvd.,N. 37th Street(north side only)and Wells Avenue N. If additional undeveloped right-of- way exists outside of the 5-foot buffer areas,those areas shall also be landscaped. The satisfaction of these requirements shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the final plat. 4. The dedicated right-of-way of N 37th Street shall not be gated at any point within the plat. Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-115,ECF, PP February 7,2006 Page 8 ORDERED THIS 7th day of February 2006. FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E INER TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February 2006 to the parties of record: Keri Weaver Neil Watts Robert E. West 1055 S Grady Way Development Services Director Hi Point Development Renton,WA 98055 City of Renton 3904 Park Ave N Renton,WA 98056 Steven B. Altringer Ronal S.Furrer PO Box 2903 3701 Wells Ave.N Sandra Spelman Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 3632 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton,WA 98056 Shailesh Tatu Infrastructure Consulting Corp Sally Rochelle Edie Hamilton 1082 Kirkland Ave NE, Ste. B 3626 Lake Washington Blvd. N 2714 Lake Washington Blvd Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Charles Huneycutt Walter J.Tomson Jeffrey&Gwen Smith 1300 N 20th Street, Ste.#I-2054 3604 Wells Avenue N 1004 N 36th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Michael Smith Barbara Premo Shirley LeSell 3706 Wells Avenue N PO Box 2072 3710 Lake Washington Blvd. N Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February 2006 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Stan Engler,Fire Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Larry Meckling,Building Official Julia Medzegian,Council Liaison Planning Commission Larry Warren,City Attorney Transportation Division Gregg Zimmerman,PBPW Administrator Utilities Division Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Neil Watts,Development Services Jennifer Henning,Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Stacy Tucker,Development Services King County Journal Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-05-115, ECF, PP February 7, 2006 Page 9 Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100(G)of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,February 21,2006. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,February 21,2006. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. _ _ _ B4 - 29 T2,4N R5E W I/2 ./ t __ ,...„ _i _ _ . . \ ..,„ _ CUR ___ — — — CUR ___. __ __ ,- * _ .... — — — — — N.__ -------- . ..---- _ _ __ _ — 1 /------ . __ _ — — — 11 40 • • • , \ _____;_ ___,- _ _ _ L._ sk..-- 7 ''' .i Ity;41111i St: ,• ,.,.__•• kt.,...._ _ _____ ___ N., cr3 R--7'-8— . . ,. N-.3-13t,b . i • , , St , . !.t i 1 r„, ,.;-•./. ! !,, , ;., „ , : ,..1.1,, . ,..i__L.L.... _ ilk• . ' 1 i -7. (.4 — — _ — — / '17- • Ca , I.: 1- ---• _____ -7. 14:1:1 Arr, ' ; ; - —1-7-7-03- 8 ,..] - ; „- . , _i_:._...--___J:7------1 8,1 : -----Tr NEI 36tiz '‘; El— ii-- i : ,t______- , 1 • env__ . Rf iE3.-- —abn -zt—R-7 8- -------10' ---- .„....-__ - fr =° TR-1 los — „.. - , • Ii/ re) i --- i --.. 1 kiri - 1 —1,________,-------:---°(--- ----; r931- ist-14-tirt-R. 0 _. . i , , , , , L, • i , i , ,. . • , ,-‹ .. ; i RC /- .,.. , 5D,. .,.., ,!... , 1 f 1 I ; i,1 , i t ' - ' i R-18 j --1 R--. 29---F-:- . 1-• g IR,.T8 it,i1 ii_1731-1 it3i*tiSt, l'., i ! ! - ,,,, , IJ • - -ii ! 'i--- ) a , , , . . , - - . • _ - , , _ ..AT___q_91,4, :at- ''j„,111,11,3011111 C 1 ! fsitlii ' ' '' • AZ-8 ill ,-, - • , RI Art R-8 " al-12t1d-i-St------'-ri-- i1 CitIP-8i , • f : : , f , iiiiil ' , ,--: -3 r -if !Ti g:.-13, 1 , If --' Ce 1 f R4f3 I i 1 I 1 it*48rj RI ?Nii, gu. i ! ! .! I 1 14 8'--- ,:- (--- — '• I stiR-.43 I W : iiiii , ILI : ifz-lEi ; f GN II-LiO' 1 ICN Vr F1-13 -ITITF i III• Cri- PT-TR-8 i CN -,..-,1- .....„,--_,,.,,?,.7- _ Ri8 ! -' - ' N 28th! Sr ,..-- i i \ -.) --e -----L-LF, , ,4,1—r,i,--,-----,---,t---; f 1 t ! IrniK • , 7 " ' 4 R•1•8 7151 - i 1 \ _- 1 •IP 1 i ri ., -7-'-- R-4 -4;•-::: D4 • 5 T23N R5E * 1/2 ,:ie=saii.go ' 4:•691-1- ZONING ,.. ..., .piiiqw imcioncia=VIC= ( ---- Beaton Clitr Limits 144000 32 T24N R5E W 1/2 mt ., City of Renton RECORDING NO. JPAGE King County, WA 1VOL PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4,SECTION 32,T 24 N.R 5 E. W.M. w r1 1 [liI . /"" PAM BUILDING MCO. To BE +. ." E' - -- �_ UEMOUSHW iu DDEEILDING TO MOLISHED BE Id ''.-1" .-- id R k IE1-:l��LtrYKY .u�"`weonI ter- � R. I t 14 ;— a WAY 1�*7 T-].A.T.•zt■er4. i `1 r . — `- --r 141110111 1 ,1►_'euiDlNo ro 1 r_ _ _ ..—� r 1 �9�£]11E:T,cPDkIII / J 1pt t MN Gal 1 ipf e ' 1 I Ld?6 I�� %RED 161 1 1 1 V1— • �MEM 90.46,. : °0s ; it be k:' 161i $ 'a 111 1 sa I�I� ,ifik 61.07,21„, , I ��„ i ril . ' : --�-- J L- -~III _ — _..1 - 1 It— „—1 IL-1... .-�161._ _i t6 1 IIIIIIIIIIC�I�4ril:olo- z1.7 — may' — us nut roar i I 1�� )118.a.41-tit 11 La M1 AwI1]!I i7•Ml Asw ?PIC A I A��T3ilE,tir:c.ti'l =^.amu- L —.._..__ i Is �L <.,,,Sr*ain i 1 "s a �4]IIIIII LET P1• I ''--r... _ -q-•—1-—"---1'� ("' Zie-e_......_.____... �1FEINI!:�IIIFM,E<,IeY! 1 I I f -1inscalmitzaut.....41,1rn III I r.-- . l y N� 111111IST71111�Ei;:Iit,.�;f1A :f _'fi El ....,. 11 i111E:• Il rKkrE 11 J I 1 LOT L6 11 I a . .«. ; ;aM.IINI I 551 %o X:;r1 '.. 7_�of 4�An+.. 1 ET:1111[ 7l'T:iT,i•.,L3 I I 1 r Illt 11111C'EiF511 y:,c:4,441 ,L — . LI_ L,•• ''''"""t.' tr B .Ei:1111[iE.�111TG� I I I L. �-- 3R DIMITrJM: i'i7tY7 1..... .1� .�Lt....1L..._ JL tat IMINMAIIIEMIliliM"TA1111 . HED q MINUFAi.?at:::,c:44M BUILDING 11111111i1AfT IIIL_,.,l#r7 TD BE X7.111.17. 11E,.le-f4 coal •DEMOLISHED 11111111�� 1MIEE131 -LetioY4! 111111110TI7•11::,tr:iP1 ANIIIIS£AAIty.... �L,,.se±x3 LEGEND: 111111111nll/1/03:11 _____ MOWN u[ WM ��� ,_„ Loo COM in 40 20 0 40 80 p —.._._ OF SURVEYA ARECORDED UNDlTATOCCUPTION aN VLeAae RIPENm RECORD !2f y 1.1111112=3 B42114ownulbq � � Imo(IR SCALE W FEET 11 V infrastructure .oil=� PLAT OF VICTORIA POINTE CON Consuiting CITY FILE NUMBER: -...._--_......-_a�y„�.B,Ayp� Corporation .�! 0YB4.BYDATE/tf✓.)r1?af:IDB NO. 1082 Kirkland Avenue NE,SuM�e B •.' "•�(� No. '4B�SRT z�sos Il L Renton,Washington 98088 'aWc lm1�" DM.BY BONE SHEET Tal.425-272-1020 Fax 428-272-1021 R.BOYD 1'4.40' 2 or 2 i 1.1'0•'A7'W15 pl e /; •i.LL° .Z/l"5509,.\ ; w .4.O,1X11,LLMS „ ...__...._..._._-..__.--..._.._...__._._...�.��....._-.._....U....- • ._. .... _....�-_ A` P waWe x1 , ` a•r Y c. >ti 1 (�, ''.`QQ`Q� 1lxrX,. , (Ast ISV1 71LL 40 pe 10005) 0310 • •!f, 1.014 109 NwO 1111111 Y l09 % .. ,Al auvw:,a l an 3201411M/0(103111003301 J. 04 5°470735 MON / 751011 • �11 Xi 0 9 ' 110,330 11101 / a 70.135 0703$34'3303 \.� 70 OS VW/1v ..tOL-.LS'S 51 17104 41u wY11 99CN , • �--/ 141 .55'v�.1 �t r r,f 5 . .cc .M rt+u 4 10'1 yi ,! r �. traf as OM A31.131011 .,9'591.11 0,fl TOW � .SL'00.,1 XN N J .. _a..,..,LI 7115 40 W IL79 .51',1,.17 al ,.4 , , .517,5/11 11,55- .�._ a-• N4,--•.• .__._� _•+•-___n---•----.._•� fn . , . , r •, , , • s9'Ol1•V 00111 7: TT-' .1 ••• 1. - , .- - ;: ,'01AN i x 4 w 0 '4 6 b y , T.144140- 'two,C F 7 J'03:: y- j -... ... .., s..: r 1 aws1.,. .. F.y . .. 1u -' Ic'�a a _-- :.l `e,h7•"7.,25,905•' -^, ___�� _ .. tt • C r��.'� \ yrol?sl n I' 'a, i` , i-.0 II.1.I ;: 1,,,�++� _ .7vrd .21"-.' yy� /ru•n nul 9) ON Lx ,I0/• ' 11 ��"� / 5x.�_.. �/ - `IW.11 / / u ,1.'9 MOO IPS,bb O N 1 -/GAY /'`11 / / 7WN X915.t 01i0J a1 I W ov>t°SoirlVI' r•�` f//:,, j.''...--'qr/-.- / 7 * J'q �£` V L. R // / r / / / ,. i Ti.i 441. s- ..._....� " �. 3045145 • Q / / a 11700, / .5.351.931 r• § ••�� a A / / .vr•9a+v �Xu.n Wwu XsuY1 .p Y / t t / ,/ / / co /Wino ( F % .a i ...-, , �/ ....a,.......i.J .� \, Y�' xf011 r• /�/ j / ! 15114 im'u 2•10,..411, 1.11 r - _....� ' •t / /It.. c.J. ilijill' !/ r' ;l 40 1114011'1643,WrlO w.. _ - y --•, _ a.')W 14'11+.L1'9 SI Odd Ma.i/4 011104- ,119 19 W- / • .001. .. .w9.. 1C•0 ..... ✓• -°. i/ / .K'4,:0 1911 J/ .. :- n . ..._ . --- -'- •.-_!_ I:909:9,.171rf _.-_Lie-- .g� / ,9nX1wo•1m.eo• � S w 7114 V W 0/9 0900J- 7N '9 7L 9.4.0 WVW -rt _..-.__.. ._ 1.�� 0•31.31371 44.6,.15]71 701 Ysoa9 AWYXo --i5— 7dld 90534 r /1 ai- 111,13 VW 7115 7014/*910 --o—•-•-- 111 33133 On.9/9 09101- 1' /' 9045.01 3 30 451011 r 1790 301 9X10 YO DVM 50M -••-�•.••---.— 34*An 1.75* 1 -115"01-dl N 31 Iiill �c , , .14.'117 Sw Irr11Rr A 300 -••.__..-.-...-•--a_ lU / O 0:10 0100 el 310101111 CMS 4010n4 own / L 314*0 WWI 117549 11,0 MAW.01'0.'011 / 011.01 wn otkal• / WOO 4:414 •N NO/gY JO u00 , 110.14000•0- 91101 907 1 • 1091 70911 150 Q / ovu / 309 �].},. 7['04.0 i / �"5 5[1'11.+131�M / 1104 SNue 10140 Dq 0055 / Ye 70 4 7W 900 On1Ol O / Oro 011•Yr•7Y On03 O M 9 4/404.9/5 las • / / // City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner VICTORIA POINTE PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA-05-115,ECF,PP PUBLIC HEARING DATE.:January 24,2006 Page 4 of 8 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on December 28, 2005, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M) for the Victoria Pointe Preliminary Plat. The DNS-M included 6 mitigation measures as listed below.A 14-day appeal period commenced on December 28,2005 and ended on January 11, 2005. No appeals were filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of the probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated(DNS-M): 1. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual, and provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of construction permits. This Plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Development Services Division. 2. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the geotechnical report dated September 21, 2005,prepared by Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. 3. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations for downstream drainage improvements and mitigation of potential and existing problems in the downstream system, as described in the Section V(Offsite Analysis) revised analysis dated December 9, 2005, prepared by ICON, Inc. and/or as subsequently modified during construction permit review by City staff. 4_ The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$488.00 per new single-family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the recording of the final plat. 6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on$530.76 per new single-family lot prior to the recording of the final plat. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CRITERIA: Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following preliminary plat criteria have been established to assist decision makers in the review of the subdivision: A. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation. The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The objective established by the RSF is to promote and enhance single-family neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with the RSF designation in that it would allow for the future construction of new single-family homes, thereby promoting goals of infill development. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use, Housing and Environmental Element policies: Land Use Element Residential Single Family Policy LU-34. Net development densities should fall within a range of 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. Staff Rpt Victoria Pointe 05-115 • • • 1:.f • • t 0/m4 • • • • • • • II 77-.1.i.t2". k. • • • • 'NOMONI71IYA 10 arras 'ORix 10 7CZNI]o0 'x0ixsx to AZIO ARZ Xi 2ZmaZ3l l 1021RR.L :gm liRY2a/Y1 Qii•t0 AZ1 s$2N ZIl1 gtt ONIt HAIR '1T3']YIYd ZNI2 Y 10 WIAZZ/211 ONIEI 0* i0V& QIVa 10 NOIZBOd ZVSL 20 1171 OZ x'X IALHON VU =JO /210111131 LL:72Atl OII moll Y01 &MifVa AY 1ZI1 YtUiJL20Q1 • 1 91[1:1 A0 TT O OIQ800I1 MIA d Iv *oft O M1O11YOIONUKfYArldM1xvl BNVWITIS '0.0 A001 MIS 10 =I1 ILL Zen 2111. 10 13*4 001 Z TIM 221. l2 R701Vd ItOZOR32IYN t0 :MS 'OR= t0 W00.0 '11OZN2A 10 74130 22Z NI 2ZYOZZf 174LN= oft: 10 f0I 1* off IOU 'i i.Y'Id d0 ii 1310'141 XI 02Q20021 ZY 11 lad IY I 'oil NOIfIb30 n0! 10 WI dYO XOZOKQUIKM wen I/11Y2'iZ32 •0'0 40 0I IOWA 10 2221 SII ASTZ 2211. lY =0IT1 • 130214:110/20 won • O • • • • t!. • 1I • ' • . • . . B4 .. 29 TZ4N R5E W 1/2. . 1 _ E A ,. . . \ .., --- ----- -- --- -- , , CUR • --- --- — — . _._ _____ ___... ..... _...... CDR (--. .. • . 1 .„-- i ---,- - - ,'------R-48-1-0` ----- > • ;C6...„ ., ; i,--- ----- t\. k......,. .. _ _....._ . , _ _ __I _—, ,," ,, -...-• . . ------- z' -••, .)• . r -: : 1 .__. .. ... cz., ... . _ _____._.:_____. . ____. .'--1---- ''Sz) : • • _.....ci • r./-: ; . . g -. St . . ci3f3tia ; i , - ; ' ' ,• • ,• • ......._....... _...... f• , , _.1_. _,.__,___ , .-, — 4-- -;--R-1-71-8--- • • pa ___ -----— ----: ":7:71- 7:Z; -' ' . _\>.' ''. 41 .—..g R-8 ,-3 --- r .__: ......./"-"TI:i__ :------ NE 36t tz 74:—:-.-- --/ TIi- irla• 'St-77-7-77 - „ - E. i -_____„ ; , , ., , f i ( . : , : ; - t ___-__J______ -- ._; L,.,:._ . ) , ! 71 ..4 f i —--r---- ' i 8-R-H;131147315t1M-R tta .-.7:--i'----':-.---' ' ' :--- , ------/:1° 1 - tt , , ' ' • ' ' . r ' — ' --- R- '0-j-- - - „......' m / •_ R '8'R-- 8--R t- 9t-' ----N---734tliTSt--7.-- i : ..„ ,,,...›.../ i ') _ _..... ------ ____:... r ,RC cE2 i — t-cf: ,•---8- , .R-913-1-7, --priR /44 i IT :i -.- -," , . i ; ! ; , , ! I 1 -4E1 --L-R-:---43' 4--__ i kfLsi N l' Oir,l'ist '-: i'-:•)''--! ---------, f --I . , . .. ) 1;1. ',"!_ liL::h,iL,ki i Lil c,•i LL_LF...tp,_ -NT-nlir.1 St , • R II , / 01 R-8 ; rz0 R-8: .41 ?tif"14(-1 1‘) i 1 -i : - -- ........... - - - -I ' ,, ( ;R-4-Ni.a.i: ij-Sti-7-77: -R---4-8i- ... -=May C • .cp- :R-'-8 i 1 ' ‘,r: „i,L : ,..:: '• i R--18 ; ------- w` - R-9 -': ' larr-1!-4'-'1).1"-- Y1111- t--1,-----7141-,10- ! iCW : I ;''CN reek 110 6 j11;:bi" cm i i , si ...,,..„.: TN--- 7T-Nt-,29thit--,14--f , r4 ,. 1----, 1 -,::,..7--0,1,-.-„..•:,„--, i CN ':, . . . I R,-,,8 1, y ' li---,' ' '' -' N ,20tii Er '. ,... ' , I -7-::--.--4K-i 6,.----: ; !Ri--81 - 1-4----.. - - __. 28t1r, St ' , . -1 7-----1 . . ,... _ .., ' , ." ' * • D4 .. 5 TZ3N FOB W 1/2 ____Ralston City Limits twio0 .n. . ZONING, ca.Raw= 32 T24N R5E W 1/2 11111111r. 12/28/04 5432 , RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE City of Renton King County, WA PORTION OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4,SECTION 32,T 24 N,R 5 E,W.M. 4 .- \ r ili 4� Ul glm PUNO80M YINO 0 PARCEL •------_ ^- TOBEBUILDING TO BE 4- _ - ^"- - �=- , DEMOUSHED BUILDING TO BE �1' ""'-`�,__.,._..___ �a lu° 1s1 DEMOU�IED LINE TABLE _� I ?4 I k I I 1 I 97 us ar FAY LI 5250 588.4DIVE , _ _ __ L 5250 388.4373•E LR 35.00 SBI'43'13'E / / I --i1 1 •.•,�_ 1 17B.U�HI�NgG�ETDO 8 I _II r ,' I, L4 5250 588.43'13.1 ... 1 W2 7 k, I p,�On s I I y,LbT 0 !q.I...I.D tpF a- 10 I ,p,,s I I !, tor i I Q1 , LS 32.50 58e•43.13'E 06,10 Adw ISIBI 0.1920 AP. I,I I 4170 Ace....l I 1100.13 NFL III I-2.t�7,wn. i''� I'td.l .. -' . I Sew I 1 4 I i bi I L6 3520 588.4373.1 y} j3} L7 9020 501'52'54$ y 6 1 I L L0. 90.00 901'54'54'V -� - J L_ J L L',-- _ _ice 1 ! L9 9020 $01.5254'2 --* ---I--jl--- c.,_ Jr- �---I- A 1- uo 82.77 NO1•5254•E 9 �u �, '{"'-1nY --J1Tr�--19j1- i��R£-1-�--4 •CTJ/.L' 12.1 L11 82,75 N01'52541 IC l,,y I L12 82.73 $01'52'54.1 `.,. L,0 IC I Me.1!]21 0,.'47 Aen. F1�1R1Ai162T 1 I _ 113 ewe u4 02.72 N01.5254N T -�._ • •1 b -._._.,l.a..,-- .' Sena a at $01'7254• .. 115 8'271 S01.5254•V » l -_ - _...._....__ _ ry `, 116 67.88 N01.52'54•E ~ 1 V, l4 I u L17, 60.16 $88 43.13# 1 L. '-1L tst..-..__.._._...___.._. ' _ 118 7020 580.43.13.4 I I E. :f- T Ti-`l I 1"- • i~._• u., L 7020 588'4313'e I ,..... Leo 7020 388.43'13•e - - 0.21 50.98 .588.431,22 1322 '11�443'e E.I I ter t0 II I 1 ,a. III I 1 I 1 L23 6420 3011•4M'1 I I 3•I 4616025 1. 1IP-7I 4,►ayTAVZ� 4. iSAr. urt94. •.g. i Z L24 6420 588'4250'1 III I" II I 4EZZ 1OAero I r na mrt s L25 64,00 582.4250.1 <_+ L26 6721 S24M1'1]'\j1 III L. _J ifl'Ll �'-- IIIIIIg L27 63.38 1488442.27'V ` �` 1' VIL01H0 Lee 64.00" N08.42.27•v 4.__..o......... .-.1L._._._ o BE L29 6420 $88.42'27$ -' '''�'' 4SHED >r� L30 7020 $88.42.27$ BUILDING L31 70.00 N88'42'27'V TO BE L32 70.00 $08.42.27$ DEMOLISHED -. L33,, 7520, N08.42.27'V 134 90.00 $01'9,�E2'554N L35 473.66 NO104373'V L36 57.54 H0_452'54N , _ L37 27.73 501.525LV 138 10621 824'01.11'E - 1.39 4921 4484.10'11'1 L40 219.31" NBB•42'50'V X 141., 117.73 N01.5254•E 142 13821 588.4313'1 LEGEND: L43 12540 301.5254•V L44 476.38 N88.42'27'W ARMY 424 NOTE A gi. ^_ MID 001211NE 40 20 0 40 80 @ _ CURVE TABLE -__ T D1112.12-12-12 FOR ATIONDOC DED 4NTTAATION PLEASE REFER TO RECORD - LENGTH RADIUS --- 128$16 aLa10 a CI. 2826 0 -1s - MVO Br SCALE IN FEET IA C2 23.41" 4 •15 0 Infrastructure n:;. PLAT OF VICTORIA POINTE L (I(;QN� Consulting CITY FILE NUMBER: FA(if•N4•SYIM1614 Corporation $0. if DM.BY 0ATE42✓,)k4/r.4r:102 NO. 1082 n.Kirldand Avenue NE Suite 8 .,'., , " N.O. r.e6 21505 A Renton,Washington 98058 a4a 2+16' ' i Tel.425-272-1020 Fax 425-272-1021 • n u CNKD.BY SCALE SHEET R.BOYD 1-.40' 2 OF 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I AIM: w . g. . Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems March 6, 2006 Staff Contact Nathan Jones, x7217 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Eastside Transportation Partnership (ETP) Agreement Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution Information Agreement Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: General Budget (paid on January 20, 2006) Expenditure Required... $500 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $500 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $500 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The ETP Agreement is to identify the voting members of ETP and provide for the continuation of the ETP as the Eastside forum for information sharing, consensus building, and coordination to resolve transportation issues and establish priorities for implementing multi-modal transportation projects and programs. This agreement has minor revisions that do not substantially change the agreement, which has been in effect since 1999. The mission of ETP is to provide an Eastside forum for inter jurisdictional cooperation to implement coordinated, prioritized transportation plans and programs through leadership, education, and advocacy. The City of Renton pays $500 for two voting members for the Eastside Transportation Partnership. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with the Eastside Transportation Partnership to continue the City of Renton's participation in ETP. H:Trans/admin/agenda 2006/ETP agenda bill for the Agreement `SY 0 PLANNING/BUILDING/ • .1 , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: March 6, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: 3 Kathy Keolker, Ma ,or FROM: Gregg Zimmerma , Ainistrator STAFF CONTACT: Nathan A. Jones, Transportation Planning Project Manager (x7217) SUBJECT: Eastside Transportation Partnership (ETP) Agreement ISSUE: Should the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with the Eastside Transportation Partnership (ETP) to continue the City of Renton's participation in ETP? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with the Eastside Transportation Partnership to continue the City of Renton's participation in ETP. BACKGROUND: The mission of ETP is to provide an Eastside forum for inter jurisdictional cooperation to implement coordinated, prioritized transportation plans and programs through leadership, education, and advocacy. To achieve its mission, ETP adopted the following goals on January 26, 1996: ➢ Develop and adopt a package of transportation priorities based on adopted land use plans that improves overall mobility for people, freight and goods, and addressing peak hour congestion on the Eastside. ➢ Jointly implement adopted priorities through leadership, education, and advocacy within communities, cities and the region. ➢ Adopt and implement a strategy for increasing funding for transportation improvements and programs. Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 March 6,2006 The ETP was established through an Interlocal Agreement in 1987 to fund a study to identify recommendations for Eastside transportation improvements. That study was completed, recommendations were adopted and staffing responsibility was transferred in 1990 from the City of Redmond to King County. Efforts have continued to implement the recommended projects, and many have been completed or are currently underway. By 1995, because of increases in population, vehicle miles traveled and new legislation including the Growth Management Act and Commute Trip Reduction Act, ETP determined that the 1991 Recommendations Report needed to be updated. In 1995, ETP was awarded funds through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and supplemented these funds with matching contributions from member jurisdictions to hire a consultant to complete the update. A new Interlocal Agreement was approved and work began in January 1997. The result of this work became known as the ETP Mobility Action Priorities (MAP). In 2000, ETP initiated a review of the MAP in order to identify accomplishments, assess status of projects and affirm priorities. The adopted 2006 ETP Work Program includes emphasis in the following areas: implementation, funding, planning, education and advocacy. cc: Jay Covington, CAO Peter Hahn, Interim Transportation Systems Director Rich Perteet, Interim Transportation Design, Planning& Programming Manager Nathan Jones, Transportation Planning Project Manager Constance Brundage,Transportation Administrative Secretary H:Trans/admin/agenda bill 2006/ETP_issue paper CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT FOR THE EASTSIDE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City of Renton recognizes that multijurisdictional transportation planning and the development of a multijurisdictional transportation plan for the Eastside is of benefit to the citizens of the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the Eastside Transportation Program was formed in 1987 to serve as a central forum to resolve transportation issues and establish priorities for transportation projects and programs on a subregional basis; and WHEREAS,the 1987 agreement was modified in 1996 and 1999; and WHEREAS, the Eastside Transportation Program's primary focus has been shifted from updating the Eastside Transportation Program recommendations to implementing the identified priorities of those recommendations through education and advocacy; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and advisable to amend the prior agreements for the Eastside Transportation Program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into the 2006-2009 Agreement for the Eastside Transportation Program. 1 ( RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of ,2006. Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of ,2006. Kathy Keolker,Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney RES.1160:2/27/06:ma 2 2006-2009 Agreement for the Eastside Transportation Partnership Parties to Agreement: City of Bellevue Small Cities City of Bothell Beaux Arts City of Kirkland Clyde Hill City of Issaquah Hunts Points City of Mercer Island Medina City of Newcastle Yarrow Point City of Redmond Transportation Improvement Board City of Renton Eastside Transportation Association City of Kenmore Puget Sound Regional Council City of Sammamish Sound Transit City of Woodinville Washington State Department of King County Transportation Snohomish County Washington Transportation Commission Eastside Transportation Choices Coalition Transmitted to participating members for signature on October 31, 2005. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and among the TOWN OF BEAUX ARTS VILLAGE, hereafter called `Beaux Arts,"and the CITY OF BELLEVUE, hereafter called "Bellevue"; and the CITY OF BOTHELL, hereafter called "Bothell"; and the CITY OF CLYDE HILL, hereafter called "Clyde Hill;" and the CITY OF HUNTS POINT, hereafter called "Hunts Point"; and the CITY OF KENMORE, hereafter called "Kenmore," and the CITY OF KIRKLAND, hereafter called "Kirkland;" and the CITY OF ISSAQUAH, hereafter called "Issaquah;" and the CITY OF MEDINA, hereafter called "Medina;" and the CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, hereafter called "Mercer Island;" and the CITY OF NEWCASTLE, hereafter called "Newcastle;" and the CITY OF REDMOND hereafter called "Redmond;" and the CITY OF RENTON, hereafter called "Renton;" ;" and the CITY OF SAMMAMISH, hereafter called "Sammamish;"and the CITY OF WOODINVILLE, hereafter called "Woodinville;" and the CITY OF YARROW POINT, hereafter called "Yarrow Point;" KING COUNTY, a legal subdivision of the State of Washington,hereafter called "King County"; SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a legal subdivision of the State of Washington, hereafter called "Snohomish County"; the Puget Sound Regional Council, hereafter called the "PSRC"; the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, hereafter called "Sound Transit"; the Transportation Improvement Board, hereafter called the "TIB"; the Eastside Transportation Association, hereafter called "ETA"; the Eastside Transportation Choices coalition, hereafter called the "ETC"; the Washington State Department of t Transportation, hereafter called the "WSDOT"; and the Washington State Transportation Commission. WHEREAS,the boundary area for the Eastside Transportation Partnership ("ETP") is the area represented on the attached map (Exhibit A),hereinafter called the "Eastside"; and WHEREAS,the parties to this agreement recognize that multi jurisdictional transportation planning and the development of a multi jurisdictional transportation plan for the Eastside would be of benefit to the parties and to affected citizens; and WHEREAS, since 1987 this group has served as the central forum for information sharing, consensus building, and coordination to resolve transportation issues, and establish priorities for implementing transportation projects and programs on a sub- regional basis; and WHEREAS, revised Inter-local Agreements reflecting updated membership,purposes, and procedures have been approved subsequently as needed to govern ETP activities and provide for the development of priority transportation improvement plans for the Eastside; and WHEREAS, the most recent update of priority transportation improvement plans for the Eastside,the Mobility Action Priorities(MAP),was completed and approved in 1998; and WHEREAS, ETP has been effective in advocating for implementation of its priorities; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein,the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 Purpose of Agreement The purpose of the Agreement is to identify the voting members of ETP,the non-voting members of the ETP, and provide for the continuation of the ETP as the Eastside forum for information sharing, consensus building, and coordination to resolve transportation issues and establish priorities for implementing multi-modal transportation projects and programs. 2.0 Role of ETP The ETP is the forum established for the Eastside subarea of King County at which elected officials, including representatives from Snohomish County, may provide input into the following decisions: a. Recommendations for the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act-Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) regional project identification and Countywide project selection b. Development of the King County Metro six year transit development plan, and implementation of transit service priorities c. Recommendations to Sound Transit on its plans and implementation of projects and services, consistent with the principle of subarea equity and other financial policies d. Coordination with the South County Area Transportation Board and the SeaShore Transportation Forum on countywide and regional transportation issues e. Other transportation related issues as the members determine 3.0 Voting and Non-voting Members 3.1 The members of ETP and their voting rights shall be as follows: MEMBERS Number of Representatives Voting Bellevue 2 Yes Bothell 2 Yes Kenmore 2 Yes Kirkland 2 Yes Issaquah 2 Yes Mercer Island 2 Yes Redmond 2 Yes Renton 2 Yes Sammamish 2 Yes Woodinville 2 Yes Newcastle 2 Yes King County 4 Yes Snohomish County 1 Yes PSRC 1 No WSDOT 1 Yes Sound Transit 1 No Transportation Improvement Board 1 No Washington State Transportation Commission 1 No Eastside Transportation Association 1 No Eastside Transportation Choices Coalition 1 No Small Cities(Beaux Arts, Hunts Point, Medina, Clyde Hill, 2 Yes Yarrow Point) Combined 3.2 Existing or new cities legally formed under the laws of incorporation of the State of Washington, located within the ETP boundaries, may petition ETP for membership during the annual open enrollment period (February 1 through March 15). The number of ETP representatives and the voting status of new members shall be determined by a simple majority of voting representatives present at a meeting of the ETP. 3.3 Additional private sector groups that represent the Eastside may be added as nonvoting members in ETP during the annual open enrollment period (February 1 through March 15). Addition of such nonvoting members shall be based on meeting the following criteria, as established in the ETP Procedures adopted October 8, 2004: • Groups must represent the entire Eastside, and not be limited to one or two jurisdictions • Groups must have a membership of at least 30 people • Groups must have an adopted mission and bylaws or operating procedures • Groups must have a mission that is compatible with ETP's mission • Groups must accept ETP's mission and purpose • Groups that participate will be evaluated at the end of the agreement period to determine whether they met the criterion of ETP's mission Addition of such nonvoting members shall be determined by a two-thirds majority vote of voting representatives present at a meeting of the ETP. Other groups or private citizens may attend ETP meetings and provide input during the public comment period. 4.0 Representation and Conduct 4.1 The representation on ETP shall be as follows: (a) Elected officials appointed for a one-year term_from each of the participating counties and cities, in the number specified above (b) The Director of WSDOT's Planning and Policy Office, the Executive Director of the PSRC; an Eastside board member of Sound Transit; the Director of the TIB; and a representative designated by the Washington Transportation Commission. (c.) A representative designated by the membership of the Eastside Transportation Association, and a representative designated by the membership of the Eastside Transportation Choices coalition, or other representatives from non-governmental interest groups that ETP determines shall become nonvoting members of ETP. 4.2 The ETP will be responsible for overall program direction, approving Technical Advisory Committee recommendations and on-going communication with the governing body of each member jurisdiction. 4.3 On an annual basis, an ETP member jurisdiction shall inform the Lead Agency in writing of its representatives and alternates in writing. Designated alternates may vote in place of designated representatives in the absence of the designated representative. 4.4 The chair and vice chair shall be elected by a majority of the voting representatives on the ETP, and each shall be a representative of a member county or city. The chair and vice chair shall serve a term of one year from February 1 through • January 31 of the following year. The chair and the vice chair shall conduct the ETP activities within adopted procedures and guidelines. The chair and vice chair are responsible for setting meeting agendas, ensuring fair opportunity for discussion, signing correspondence, and speaking on behalf of the ETP. 4.5 The ETP may establish its own bylaws and rules of procedures and may modify these as appropriate. Such bylaws and rules shall be consistent with the provisions of this Agreement and modifications to such bylaws and rules will not alter this Agreement. 4.6 With a simple majority, the ETP can adopt resolutions in support of member jurisdictions or regional activities, authorize studies, approve correspondence or request information. Any individual ETP member may request that a minority statement be included in the ETP communications or otherwise distributed with the ETP adopted majority position. 5.0 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Each member jurisdiction or agency shall appoint an appropriate staff person to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The TAC shall provide technical assistance as requested by the ETP and shall advise the ETP on emergent transportation issues, and be responsible for overall program development including drafting of the work program. The TAC shall also direct and review consultant work, maintain a public information effort, and coordinate its activities with adjacent jurisdictions including, but not limited to, the rural cities, and the City of Seattle. Other jurisdictions, agencies or groups may be added to the TAC as determined by the ETP. The ETP TAC should represent planning, public works and inter-governmental relations departments of member jurisdictions and agencies. When appropriate, the TAC will make recommendations for consideration of the ETP. The TAC's recommendations shall be arrived at by consensus of a majority of the TAC members present. If the Technical Advisory Committee is unable to reach consensus on a particular issue, TAC members may present a dissenting opinion to the ETP for consideration. 6.0 Lead Agency King County will be the lead agency for the purposes of receipt of funds, contract administration, and disbursement of funds associated with consultant contracts and study- related expenses. King County shall appoint a staff member to serve as Project Manager for special projects. King County shall also provide general administrative and program support for the ETP,_shared with technical staff representatives of ETP member jurisdictions and agencies, as shown below. King County assumes wage and benefits cost of its staff performing Lead Agency responsibilities. a. Provide administrative support to the ETP meetings, such as develop materials, assist chair in setting meeting agendas, prepare meeting summaries, and ensure timely distribution of ETP and TAC meeting notices and materials. b. Work as necessary with the host jurisdiction on ETP meeting site arrangements. c. Record, administer and distribute funds collected as dues and contributions by ETP members for special projects. The Lead Agency shall maintain open records for inspection by members of the ETP. d. Provide support as needed to the ETP Chair including the preparation of correspondence and other materials. e. Coordinate TAC and other standing or ad hoc committee meetings; develop material; prepare meeting summaries. f Monitor land use and transportation planning efforts of agencies within the Puget Sound region for issues/activities relevant to ETP. g. As needed, coordinate consultant services or other special projects agreed upon by the ETP including taking the lead in drafting consultant scope of work or project descriptions. h. Monitor the ETP work program to ensure agenda items are scheduled in a timely manner. i. Coordinate the maintenance and updating of the ETP Mobility Action Priorities (MAP), when determined appropriate and feasible. j. Coordinate the joint submittal of grant applications for funding under sources available through, local, state, federal and private sources. 7.0 Member Agency Staff Support Each member jurisdiction and agency is expected to contribute such staff as is necessary to accomplish the work program adopted by the ETP. Jurisdictions may be excused from such a commitment if doing so conflicts with the day to day operation of the jurisdiction's activities. 9.0 Work Program The ETP may undertake activities consistent with its purposes and shall prepare an annual work program for the following year for submittal to its members. 9.0 Withdrawal of a Party from this Agreement Each party, for its convenience and without cause or for any reason whatsoever, may withdraw from participation in this Agreement by providing written notice, sent certified mail, return receipt required,to all of the other parties at least thirty(30) days in advance of the effective date of the withdrawal. A withdrawing party shall not be entitled to a refund of any payments to ETP but shall make any contributions required to be paid to other parties under this Agreement for costs which had been obligated prior to the effective date of the withdrawal. In the event a party withdraws, the remaining parties shall amend this Agreement as necessary to reflect changes in the named parties and cost and revenue allocations. In the event of withdrawal by a party, this Agreement shall terminate as to that party but shall continue in effect with respect to the remaining parties. However, the termination of this Agreement with respect to one or more parties shall not affect any of the parties' rights or obligations, including any rights or obligations of a withdrawing party, that are expressly intended to survive termination. Each party's funding to perform its obligations under the Agreement, beyond the current appropriation year, is conditional upon appropriation by the party's governing body of sufficient funds to support said obligations. Should such an appropriation not be approved for a future year, a party may exercise its right to withdraw as provided herein. 10.0 Duration This Agreement shall take effect upon being duly adopted by the governing bodies of all parties and executed by the authorized representatives of all parties. This Agreement shall remain in effect until all the tasks have been completed to the satisfaction of the ETP or until such time as the participating members choose to conclude the program for other reasons,but in no case shall the program extend beyond December 31, 2008, unless terminated earlier or extended in accordance with Section 11.0. If all parties desire to extend this Agreement beyond December 31, 2008, they shall execute a Statement of Extension. In no event shall the Agreement be extended beyond December 31, 2010. 11.0 Termination All parties to this Agreement must agree to terminate this Agreement in order for such termination to be effective. If all parties desire to terminate this Agreement, they shall execute a Statement of Termination. Upon termination, no party shall be required to make any additional contributions. Any remaining funds shall be refunded to the parties to this Agreement according to Section 13.0. 12.0 Real and Personal Property The acquisition of real property is not anticipated under this Agreement. Any personal property acquired pursuant to this Agreement shall be held by the Lead Agency. In the event this Agreement expires or is terminated in accordance with Section 11.0, any personal property other than cash shall remain with the Lead Agency. 13.0 Return of Funds l At such time as this Agreement expires or is terminated in accordance with Section 11.0, any unexpended and uncommitted funds shall be distributed proportionately to those parties to this Agreement at the time of termination based on each party's percentage share of the original contribution. 14.0 Financing 14.1 ETP Yearly Dues --Each member, county and city, will contribute $250.00 annually per vote awarded to remain members in good standing. The designated Lead agency shall not be required to pay yearly dues. This revenue shall be used for special events,public education, or other expenses authorized by the ETP. 15.0 Filing This Agreement shall be filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections. 16.0 Legal Relations 16.1 The parties shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations. 16.2 This Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. No employees or agents of one party or any of its contractors or subcontractors shall be deemed, or represent themselves to be, employees of any other party. 16.3 Each party shall defend,indemnify and hold harmless the other party and all of its officials, employees,principals and agents from all claims, demands, suits, actions, and liability of any kind whatsoever which arise out of, are connected with, or are incident to any negligent acts of the first party, its contractor, and/or employees, agents, and representatives in performing the first party's obligations under this Agreement. The parties agree that their obligations under this paragraph extend to claims made against one party by the other party's own employees. For this purpose, the parties, by mutual negotiation, hereby waive any immunity that, as respects the other party only, would otherwise be available against such claims under the industrial insurance provisions of RCW Title 51. In the event either party incurs attorney's fees, costs or other legal expenses to enforce the provisions of this section, against the other party, all such fees, costs and expenses shall be recoverable by the prevailing party. 16.4 The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive and remain applicable to each of the parties notwithstanding any termination or expiration of this Agreement and notwithstanding a party's withdrawal from this Agreement. 17.0 Entirety and Modifications , 17.1 This Agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. 17.2 This Agreement may be modified or extended only by written instrument signed by all the parties hereto. 18.0 Counterparts The signature pages of this Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original. • i IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized officer or representative as of the date set forth below its signature. CITY OF BELLEVUE CITY OF RENTON CITY OF MEDINA By By By Date Date Date CITY OF BOTHELL CITY OF WOODINVILLE CITY OF YARROW POINT By By By Date Date Date CITY OF KIRKLAND KING COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD By By By Date Date Date _ CITY OF ISSAQUAH SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL By By By Date Date Date CITY OF MERCER ISLAND TOWN OF BEAUX ARTS SOUND TRANSIT VILLAGE By Date By By Date Date CITY OF NEWCASTLE CITY OF CLYDE HILL WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By By By Date Date Date CITY OF REDMOND CITY OF HUNTS POINT WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By By By Date Date Date CITY OF SAMMAMISH EASTSIDE TRANSPORTATION CITY OF KENMORE ASSOCIATION By By By Date Date Date EASTSIDE TRANSPORTATION CHOICES COALITION By Date / '''' '(//1 ,., , ‘ ,...._ , ..,..._,_ , to .. mb isi niy ,- B. '°gym e • C1 etrina % i ' w� , S 6 d 1 Ki e::. ndµ ;•. Y a - ._,� "'\���// ". 'N : :-;' - Kng L�a ave ',....„1 , ' ', 'V . 1. ,-rre .Point `i',, , ' yrr Point , ""`,.",,,. Mea Ina ,Chid J -Bellevue °�mamish �� , > iK ky V ,.ill : , ' .. Jr 'Bellevue :` ,, ' 1 ' r \-::::,,'' ' , ,, ) 1 , Newcastle a , ,..,,,,,,.,,,.. '''.,,- ,;i„hi:,L,,,,,,_. .' '. ......:;:i. „:"..:‘...,,::::".::;.:.:,,,,'i..,',',,;;'14`8,:11.,' '‘. ,, • . , \\:. , (0,, , 6.,';' ' '' , to I S 4 6 - . I c 1 . (,c q ,. Eastside Transportation Parternship (ETP) Boundary (2003) Legend Streets-Principal Arterials The nformaton ncluded on this map has been compled by Kng Streets-Freeways staff Irns Cointy oa variety of sources ar6 is subject to charge �' wthout notce.Kng County makes no representations or warranties,express or mplied,as toacevacy,completeness, ETP tmelness or rights to the use of such mformat,an Q Seashore&ETP King County shell nct be liable for any general speaal November 13,2002 indirect,mcidentat or consequential damages ncbdmg,Int not / `t Q SCATBd&ETP imted to,lost revenues or lost profits resultng from the use 04 0 04 08 12 16 2 Wes 1 J to misuse of the information oontaned on this map Any sale of tha map or nformatan on the map c prohibted King County I I Incorporated Area crony by written permesbn of Kng County a cons us ap,e EXHIBIT A CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: 6 •/7 • Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: March 6, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Staff Contact Nathan Jones, x7217 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) Ordinance Contract Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution Information Contract Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: General Budget (paid on January 20, 2006) Expenditure Required... $75.00 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $75.00 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $75.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The purpose of the agreement is to identify the voting and non-voting members of the South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd), and provide for the continuation of the SCATBd as the South King County forum for information sharing, consensus building and coordinating to resolve transportation issues. This agreement has minor revisions that do not substantially change the agreement, which has been in effect since 1999. The mission of SCATBd is to serve as a South King County forum for information sharing, consensus building, and coordinating in order to resolve transportation issues and promote transportation programs that benefit the South King County area. The City of Renton pays $75 for one voting member for the South County Area Transportation Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the contract with the South County Area Transportation Board to continue the City of Renton's participation in SCATBd. H:Trans/Admin/Agenda Bili/2006/SCATBd agreement C.)ti`SY � PLANNING/BUILDING/ • s, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT `e'P�N�o� MEMORANDUM DATE: March 6, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, 1 FROM: Gregg ZimmermariA'dministrator STAFF CONTACT: Nathan A. Jones, Project Manager, x 7217 SUBJECT: South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) Contract ISSUE: Should the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the contract with the South County Area Transportation Board to continue the City of Renton's participation in SCATBd? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the contract with the South County Area Transportation Board to continue the City of Renton's participation in SCATBd. BACKGROUND: The mission of SCATBd is to serve as a South King County forum for information sharing, consensus building, and coordinating in order to resolve transportation issues and promote transportation programs that benefit the South King County area. To achieve its mission, SCATBd adopted the following goals: • Develop and promote a transportation system that will provide personal mobility choices for South County residents consistent with the goals of the Growth Management Act and; • Develop and promote transportation and related actions that promote and sustain economic development through efficient movement of people and goods within the South County and contiguous areas. Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 March 6,2006 SCATBd was initially formed in the late 1980's to identify and promote transportation improvements in South King County. Originally consisting of four member cities and King County,this formation expanded in 1992 to include 14 cities. Since 1992, SCATBd has provided valuable input to the development of the King County Metro Transit Six-Year Plan and service implemented in accordance with that plan, the development of the South County elements of the Regional Transit Authority's (RTA) plan that received voter approval in November 1996, and has competed successfully for federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act(ISTEA) funding. cc: Jay Covington,CAO Peter Hahn,Interim Transportation Systems Director Rich Perteet, Interim Transportation Design,Planning and Programming Supervisor Nathan Jones,Transportation Planning Project Manager Constance Brundage,Transportation Systems Administrative Secretary H:Trans/admin/agenda 2006/SCATBd_issue paper CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF '1'HE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOARD. WHEREAS, the City of Renton recognizes that multijurisdictional transportation planning and coordination is beneficial to the City; and WHEREAS, Renton and South King County have a history of multijurisdictional transportation planning dating back to the late 1970s; and WHEREAS, King County, Metro, WSDOT and the cities of Auburn, Des Moines, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and SeaTac have demonstrated,through the South County Area Transportation Benefit District Steering Committee and program development effort, the benefits that can be achieved by regional coordination; and WHEREAS, the enormous cost of many of the needed transportation improvements and their importance to the South King County as a whole demonstrate the need for a cooperative approach to planning, financing, and construction of these improvements; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to share information and continue the coordination effort that Renton maintains with other South County jurisdictions and related regional agencies; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and advisable to amend the prior agreements for the South King County Transportation Board; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION IL The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into the 2006-2009 Agreement for the South County Area Transportation Board for the purpose of information-sharing, coordination, and consensus-building on transportation issues with other South County jurisdictions and related regional agencies. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of ,2006. • Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of ,2006. Kathy Keolker,Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney RES.1161:2/27/06:ma 2 2006-2009 AGREEMENT For the SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD Parties to Agreement City of Algona Pierce Transit City of Auburn Port of Seattle City of Black Diamond Puget Sound Regional Council City of Burien Sound Transit City of Covington Transportation Improvement Board City of Des Moines Washington State Department of City of Enumclaw Transportation Muckleshoot Tribe City of Federal Way King County City of Kent City of Maple Valley City of Milton City of Normandy Park City of Pacific City of Renton City of SeaTac City of Tukwila Transmitted to participating members on October 28, 2005. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and among the CITY OF ALGONA,hereafter called "Algona"; the CITY OF AUBURN, hereafter called "Auburn"; the CITY OF BLACK DIAMOND, hereafter called "Black Diamond"; the CITY OF BURIEN, hereafter called "Burien"; the CITY OF COVINGTON, hereafter called"Covington"; the CITY OF DES MOINES, hereafter called"Des Moines"; the CITY OF ENUMCLAW, hereafter called "Enumclaw"; the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,hereafter called"Federal Way"; KING COUNTY, a legal subdivision of the State of Washington, hereafter called "King County"; the 10/27/2005 CITY OF KENT,hereafter called"Kent";the CITY OF MAPLE VALLEY,hereafter called "Maple Valley"; the CITY OF MILTON, hereafter called "Milton"; the CITY OF NORMANDY PARK,hereafter called"Normandy Park'; the CITY OF PACIFIC,hereafter called"Pacific"; the CITY OF RENTON, hereafter called "Renton"; the CITY OF SEATAC, hereafter called "SeaTac"; the CITY OF TUKWILA, hereafter called"Tukwila";the PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL, hereafter called the"PSRC"; the CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, hereafter called"Sound Transit"; the TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD, hereafter called"TIB"; the PORT OF SEATTLE,hereafter called the"Port of Seattle"; PIERCE TRANSIT,hereafter called"Pierce Transit";the MUCKLESHOOT TRIBE; and the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereafter called"WSDOT." WHEREAS, South King County has a history of multi jurisdictional transportation planning dating back to the late 1970's including the Green River Valley Transportation Action Plan (GRVTAP), which was a multi jurisdictional effort coordinated by the Puget Sound Council of Governments (now Puget Sound Regional Council)and involving King County,the Washington State Department of Transportation, (WSDOT)and the cities of Auburn, Kent, Renton and Tukwila;and WHEREAS, each of the jurisdictions in the South King County area has experienced significant population growth and economic development in the last decade,and projects continued growth and development in the future; and WHEREAS,the enormous cost of many of the needed transportation improvements and their importance to South King County as a whole demonstrate the need for a cooperative approach to the planning, financing and construction of these improvements; and WHEREAS, King County, WSDOT and the South King County cities of Auburn, Des Moines, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, SeaTac, Burien, Federal Way,Algona, Pacific, Milton,Normandy Park, Enumclaw, and Black Diamond in 1992 recognized that a cooperative approach to the transportation problems would facilitate application of the South King County jurisdictions for funding from the State of Washington and the United States,and in recognition of this, formed the South County Area Transportation Board(SCATBd) to serve as a central forum for solving transportation issues affecting the South County area jurisdictions, and were later joined by the new cities of Maple Valley and Covington; and the Muckleshoot Tribe. WHEREAS,the King County Comprehensive Plan for Public Transportation- Long Range Policy Framework, adopted in 1993, divided Metro service into three geographic subareas for the purpose of allocating new transit subsidy; and WHEREAS, the Six-Year Transit Development Plan, adopted in 1995, calls for the three subarea transportation boards (the Eastside Transportation Partnership, South County Area Transportation Board, and SeaShore Transportation Forum) to review,refine, and recommend service priorities to the King County Executive; and WHEREAS, Sound Transit relies on the three subarea transportation boards to review and recommend modifications to Sound Move Plan implementation related services and projects, and to participate in future phase high capacity transit development efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein,the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.0 Purpose of Agreement The purpose of the Agreement is to identify the voting and non-voting members of the South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd), and provide for the continuation of the SCATBd as the South King County forum for information sharing, consensus building and coordinating to resolve transportation issues. 2.0 Role of SCATBd The SCATBd is the forum established for the South County subarea of King County(Exhibit 1) at which elected officials may provide input into the following decisions, and such other transportation-related issues as the members determine: • Recommendations for the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act-Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)regional project identification and Countywide project selection • Development of the King County Metro Six Year Transit Development Plan, and implementation of transit service priorities • Recommendations to Sound Transit as it plans and implements projects and services. • Coordination with the Eastside Transportation Partnership and the SeaShore Transportation Forum on countywide and regional transportation issues. 3.0 Voting and Non-Voting Members 3.1. The members of SCATBd and their voting rights shall be as follows: MEMBERS NUMBER OF VOTING REPRESENTATIVES Algona 1 Yes Auburn 1 Yes Black Diamond 1 Yes Burien 1 Yes Covington 1 Yes Des Moines 1 Yes Enumclaw 1 Yes Federal Way 1 Yes King County 2 Yes Kent 1 Yes Maple Valley 1 Yes Milton 1 Yes Muckleshoot Tribe 1 Yes Normandy Park 1 Yes Pacific 1 Yes Renton 1 Yes* SeaTac 1 Yes Tukwila 1 Yes Port of Seattle 1 No Puget Sound Regional Council 1 No Sound Transit 1 No Pierce Transit 1 No Transportation Improvement Board 1 No Washington State Department of Transportation _ 1 No 3.2 *The "South King County" subarea is recognized as one of three subareas in King County providing input for Metro Transit and Sound Transit decisions allocating service or capital resources. The South County Area Transportation Board is established as the body responsible for making recommendations on these issues. The City of Renton is located in the East King subarea for Sound Transit decisions. For actions relating to Sound Transit issues, only those jurisdictions in the "South King County" subarea shall vote. 3.3 Existing or new cities legally formed under the laws of incorporation of the State of Washington may petition SCATBd for membership. The number of SCATBd representatives and the status of new members shall be determined by a simple majority of voting representatives present at a meeting of the SCATBd at which a quorum is present. 3.4 Private sector groups that represent the South County may be added as nonvoting members in SCATBd as determined by a simple majority of voting representatives present at a meeting of the SCATBd at which a quorum is present. 4.0 SCATBd Operations 4.1 Each member city shall be entitled to one position on the Board. King County shall be entitled to two positions, one for the King County Executive, and one for a King County Councilmember representing the South King County area. The Port of Seattle, PSRC, TIB, Pierce Transit, Sound Transit and WSDOT shall be entitled to one position each. Each member shall appoint one representative and one alternate to the Board, each for one-year terms. For the County and cities, the representative shall be an elected official; the alternate may be an elected official or high level staff member. 4.2 The Board will be responsible for overall program direction,approving Technical Advisory Committee (Section 5.2) recommendations, and on-going communication with the governing body of each member jurisdiction. 4.3 A majority of the voting representatives shall constitute a quorum of the Board, which shall be required to conduct business. The Board shall act by majority vote of the quorum. The Board may establish its own bylaws and rules of procedure, and may modify these as appropriate. Such bylaws and rules shall be consistent with the provisions of the Agreement, and modifications to such bylaws and rules will not alter this Agreement. 4.4 The Chair and Vice-Chair shall be elected by a majority of the voting representatives on the SCATBd, and each shall be one of the representatives of the county or a member city. The Chair and Vice Chair shall serve a term of one year from the January meeting. 4.5 The Chair and Vice Chair shall conduct the SCATBd activities within adopted procedures and guidelines. They are responsible for setting meeting agendas,ensuring fair opportunity for discussion, signing correspondence, and speaking on behalf of SCATBd. 4.6 With a simple majority,the SCATBd can adopt resolutions in support of member jurisdictions or activities in the region,authorize studies, and approve correspondence or request information. 5.0 Committees 5.1. The Board may establish such committees as are necessary to carry out its purpose including but not limited to a Technical Advisory Committee as described below. 5.2. Each member jurisdiction or agency shall appoint an appropriate department director or division manager to the Technical Advisory Committee(TAC). The City of Seattle, Pierce County,the City of Tacoma, and Pierce Transit may appoint similar level staff to the TAC. Other jurisdictions, agencies,or groups may be added as determined by the Board. The TAC shall provide technical assistance as requested by the Board and shall advise the Board of emergent transportation issues for the Board's consideration. To the extent possible, existing technical or other work groups with which South County jurisdictions are participating should be used. South County area staff could, if necessary, form a subarea caucus for the purpose of assisting in bringing issues to the Technical Advisory Committee or the Board. 6.0 Lead Agency King County shall provide general administrative and program support for the SCATBd and will be the Lead Agency for the purposes of coordination and receipt of any funds or contract administration. King County assumes wage and benefits cost of its staff performing Lead Agency responsibilities. 7.0 Member Agency Staff Support Each member jurisdiction and agency is expected to contribute such staff as is necessary to accomplish the work program adopted by the SCATBd. 8.0 Work Program The SCATBd may undertake activities consistent with its purposes and shall prepare an annual work program for the following year and progress report on the year just completed for submittal to its members. 9.0 Financing and Cost Sharing Guidelines: 9.1 SCATBd Yearly Dues—Each member city with a population above 30,000 shall contribute $75.00 annually to remain members in good standing. Each member city with a population below 30,000 shall contribute$50.00 annually to remain members in good standing. The designated Lead Agency shall not be required to pay yearly dues. This revenue shall be used for special events,public education, or other expenses authorized by SCATBd. 9.2 The following guidelines shall generally apply: (1) Annual Review of Financing: The Forum shall determine by June 30 of each year whether an additional financial contribution will be requested of the Board jurisdictions and agencies. (2) Voting Members: Costs shall be shared among member jurisdictions other than King County by a method as determined by action of the Board. Unless agreed to otherwise, King County's share shall be limited to the costs of providing staff support. (3) Non-voting Members: The member agencies shall not be expected to make a direct funding contribution. [Since non-voting members could include private parties,they shouldn't be obligated to make payment in cash or in-kind or have any other obligations. If they are obligated to perform under the agreement,it would be something other than an interlocal agreement and different procedures would need to be followed in order to adopt it.] (4) Modification to Agreement Required: A modification to this agreement specifying cost- sharing,purpose, scope of work and other details is required to obligate a member jurisdiction to funding participation. 10.0 Withdrawal of a Party from this Agreement Each party, for its convenience and without cause or for any reason whatsoever, may withdraw from participation in this Agreement by providing written notice, sent certified mail,return receipt required,to all of the other parties at least thirty(30) days in advance of the effective date of the withdrawal. A withdrawing party shall not be entitled to a refund of any dues or other payments to SCATBd but shall make any contributions required to be paid to other parties under this Agreement for costs, which had been obligated prior to the effective date of the withdrawal. In the event a party withdraws,the remaining parties shall amend this Agreement as necessary to reflect changes in the named parties and cost and revenue allocations. In the event of withdrawal by a party,this Agreement shall terminate as to that party but shall continue in effect with respect to the remaining parties. However, the termination of this Agreement with respect to one or more parties shall not affect any of the parties' rights or obligations, including any rights or obligations of a withdrawing party,that are expressly intended to survive termination. Each party's funding to perform its obligations under the Agreement, beyond the current appropriation year, is conditional upon appropriation by the party's governing body of sufficient funds to support said obligations. Should such an appropriation not be approved for a future year, a party may exercise its right to withdraw as provided herein, or remain as a non-voting member. 11.0 Duration This Agreement shall take effect upon being duly adopted by the governing bodies of all parties and executed by the authorized representatives of all parties. This Agreement shall remain in effect until December 31, 2008,unless terminated earlier or extended in accordance with Section 17.0. If all parties desire to extend this Agreement beyond December 31, 2008,they shall execute a Statement of Extension. In no event shall the Agreement be extended beyond December 31, 2010. 12.0 Termination All parties to this Agreement must agree to terminate this Agreement in order for such termination to be effective. If all parties but one terminate, that one party cannot represent itself as SCATBd. If all parties desire to terminate this Agreement,they shall execute a Declaration of Termination. Any remaining funds shall be refunded to the parties to this Agreement according to Section 14.0. 13.0 Real and Personal Property The acquisition of real property is not anticipated under this Agreement. Any personal property acquired pursuant to this Agreement shall be held by the Lead Agency. In the event this Agreement expires or is terminated in accordance with Section 12.0,any personal property other than cash shall remain with the Lead Agency. 14.0 Return of Funds At such time as this Agreement expires or is terminated in accordance with Section 12.0, any unexpended and uncommitted funds shall be distributed, based on the two tiered population contribution guidelines outlined in Section 9.0, among the contributing parties at the time of termination. 15.0 Filing This Agreement shall be filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections. 16.0 Legal Relations 16.1 The parties shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations. 16.2 This Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. No employees or agents of one party or any of its contractors or subcontractors shall be deemed, or represent themselves to be, employees of any other party. 16.3 Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other parties and all of their officials, employees, principals and agents from all claims, demands, suits, actions, and liability of any kind whatsoever which arise out of, are connected with,or are incident to any negligent acts of the indemnifying party, its contractor, and/or employees,agents, and representatives in performing the indemnifying party's obligations under this Agreement. The parties agree that their obligations under this paragraph extend to claims made against one party by the other party's own employees. For this purpose,the parties, by mutual negotiation,hereby waive, as respects the other party only,any immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the industrial insurance provisions of RCW Title 51. In the event any party incurs attorney's fees, costs or other legal expenses to enforce the provisions of this section, against the other party, all such reasonable fees, costs and expenses shall be recoverable by the prevailing party. 16.4 The provisions of this Section shall survive and remain applicable to each of the parties notwithstanding any termination or expiration of this Agreement and notwithstanding a party's withdrawal from this Agreement. 17.0 Entirety and Modifications 17.1 This Agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations,representations and agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. This Agreement may be modified or extended only by written instrument signed by all parties hereto. 18.0 Counterparts The signature pages of this Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of whom shall be an original. Signature Page IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized officer or representative as of the date set forth below its signature. CITY OF ALGONA KING COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA By By By Date Date Date CITY OF AUBURN CITY OF KENT PIERCE TRANSIT By By By Date Date Date CITY OF BLACK DIAMOND CITY OF MAPLE VALLEY PORT OF SEATTLE By By BY Date Date Date CITY OF BURIEN CITY OF MILTON PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL By By By Date Date Date CITY OF COVINGTON CITY OF NORMANDY PARK SOUND TRANSIT By By By Date Date Date CITY OF DES MOINES CITY OF PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD By By By Date Date Date CITY OF ENUMCLAW CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By By By Date Date Date CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY OF SEATAC MUCKELSHOOT TRIBE By By By Date Date Date • . , .1100. ..,,,..„, _al ,,,, _ ,„, kiritkilprki --iri .,,,Hrk.. ,tv.,„ ..„........„,.... , llikmi a!!: )40 ui e i R ' —,,..0.1„44,:t n .;;' r 44,,,41;-.' t' 4140 I., 400. No Ct ' r�: • �: 3 -:;........r7,1-.::,,,, - 5i:r ,,� 7 , ,,,,,,..4,,,,-, „.,. .., .-„„itj , -.,--,...„ '',,,e01; * 8 yY: - t70 x§ S 1,1::,f1 a,'�.40-1,21.,,' e l 3 l °� r�' Yew *'� 4.41 " �a•2 ! ,�, , (c.,1:0/11,11.... : ,.,;....'i..., i �: - , �<,,. lc• : c, ¢yt •�is s ¢ § uuz'� �Y" nx'" 3t kr Y 7,' � t l OPPiiN,‘,.T.,,I,,t,a01,,,_,Hi7fi.'(0)14..r.4:;,,,Z2i1.*,..iir- .—AlliW \,'. ' •*)••";:,..' ',4iAlt:tt:- t.':INI" ,.';'„-;'"Y.L2''-1 'N-•:,,,,,P:'***. . ' • .:"....,', , 4;=7A-:,,,i.:4,; sad i F + �`t`L. ;I all M1 i ALI.' -''',. South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) 2003 The hfamaton hcluded on tlds map has been compledby King „ Legend Cornty atatl fmm s wriely of sources and i►arbject to ehaipe without nope.KhO Cpnty makes no r�reeentabors or �jStreets-Principal Arterials W r.nbea,express or hrylied,as m accusry,completeness, ` , tinNhes;or dots to the use or suds in et A V Streets-FreeWays King County andl ntl be liable for any Qneral spetlat November 13,2002 fndired,incidental or consequent' Amapa hcbdinp,bit not SCATBd Imtedtincid reienuesor bstpm/kreadthpkomtheuee 07 0 07 f4 21 28 15 Roes \� a mouse of the informatlon contairod on this mep. 0 SCATBd&ETP My isle or the map or hbrma6on on the map b prohtbted King County except by written perm4sbn of Khg County. �.��. us�v..> incorporated Area CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I AIN: . • . 1 Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: March 6, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Staff Contact Peter Hahn, Interim Transportation Agenda Status Systems Director (x7242) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Non-motorized Connection From South 5th Street to Ordinance South 6th Street Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Issue Paper Study Sessions TIP #13, South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood Information Street Improvements Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $35,251.20 Total Transfer/Amendment None Required Amount Budgeted $395,000 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $395,000 City Share Total Project.. $35,300 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Bill Rasmussen,the City Parks Department's project manager on the new playground and connection to South Fifth Street(CAG 05-185), contacted the Planning/Building/Public Works Department through the City's Transportation Planning Section with a proposal to complete the connection to South 6th Street via a ten-foot wide multi-use path. Bill Rasmussen would manage the entire project. The Transportation Planning Section's involvement would be limited to planning and funding of the $35,251.20 addition. Funding will come from TIP#13,South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood Street Improvements. Historical recognition of this corridor as a high priority non-motorized connection is well documented. It has been recognized as a valuable connection for bicyclists, skaters,pedestrians and others who travel into the Central Business District from the south via non-motorized means, including those confined to a wheelchair. This connection was highlighted in the City of Renton Trails Master Plan September 1990 and the Renton Non-motorized Transit Access Study 1998 and is included in the forthcoming City of Renton Trails Master Plan Update. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize a construction contract change order to CAG 05-185 to add the subject multi-use path to the total construction project. H:Div\Trans\Admin\Agenda 2006 Burnett 5th to 6th Agenda Bill.doc �ti` O� PLANNING/BUILDING/az, �, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT •4Nr � MEMORANDUM DATE: March 6, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayo FROM: ) � Gregg Zimmerma4, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Dan Hasty, Transportation Planning, x7246 SUBJECT: Non-motorized Connection From South 5th Street to South 6th Street ISSUE: Should the City take advantage of an opportunity to construct approximately 400 linear feet of a ten-foot wide multi-use(bicycle/pedestrian) path, at a cost of$35,251.20, by adding this work to the Parks Department's current contract with T. F. Sahli Construction Company(CAG 05-185)? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize a construction contract change order to CAG 05-185 to add the subject multi- use path to the total construction project. BACKGROUND: Historical recognition of this corridor as a high priority non-motorized connection is well documented. It has been recognized as a valuable connection for bicyclists, skaters, pedestrians and others who travel into the Central Business District from the south via non-motorized means, including those confined to a wheelchair. This connection was highlighted in the City of Renton Trails Master Plan September 1990, the Renton Non- motorized Transit Access Study 1998, and is included in the upcoming City of Renton Trails Master Plan Update. Bill Rasmussen, the City Parks Department's project manager on the new playground and connection to South 5th Street (CAG 05-185), contacted the Planning/Building/Public Works Department through the City's Transportation Planning Section with a proposal to complete the connection to South 6th Street via a ten-foot wide multi-use path. Bill Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council February 27,2006 Page 2 of 2 Rasmussen would manage the entire project. The Transportation Planning Section's involvement would be limited to planning and funding the $35,251.20 addition. Funding would come from TIP #13,South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood Street Improvements. This project is part of a larger project to provide sidewalk and roadway improvements in the South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood. Attachments: Trails Plan—Burnett Trail,approved in 2005 Burnett Trail except from City of Renton Tails Master Plan dated September 1990 Bicycle Route Map Connectivity Needs(page 10)from Renton Nonmotorized Transit Access Study, 1998 Burnett Linear Park Schematic Design cc: Peter Hahn,Interim Transportation Systems Director Rich Perteet,Interim Transportation Design,Planning and Programming Supervisor Dan Hasty,Transportation Planning Bill Rasmussen,Parks CIP Project Manager File H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda 2006\Bumett 5th to 6th Extension Issue Paper.doc 0 — COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • a, • MEMORANDUM DATE: January 4,2006 TO: Dan Hasty FROM: Bill Rasmussen Ci 1 -••• SUBJECT: Burnett Linear Park Pedestrian/Bike Sidewalk We have an Alternate Bid from our contractor for$4,787.20 to do the mid block portion of the pathway and a bid to do the extension to 6th Street for a sum of$30, 464 for a total project of$35,251.20. This will provide for a continuous pathway the length of the boulevard from 5th street to 6th street. i:\burnett playground\additional sidewalk doc.doc CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 -2011 SIX YEAR TIP South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood Street Improvements Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12194 RANK: 13 CONTACT: Ryan Plut 425.430.7372 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Provide improvements and asphalt overlay in the South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood to include Traffic improvements in the South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood expected to go to the S Burnett Av/S 4th intersection. Asphalt overlay Shattuck Av S from SW 7th St to Houser Wy S, ad in June 2005. King County Metro mitigation funds of$175,000 were assigned to as South 6th St from Burnett Av S to Shattuck Av S,SW 7th St from Shattuck Av S to Rainier Av S, follows: $40,000 for design of improvements for Burnett/S 4th intersection;$60,000 South 5th St from Burnett Av S to Smithers Av S. reserved for Burnett/S 4th intersection construction with Council concur; $75,000 for South Renton street overlay projects. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Deteriorating streets. New 2006 projects provide sidewalks and access to Burnett Linear Park. Intersection design of 4th&Burnett complete;construct improvements in 2005 pending funding available. Need Council approval of$60,000 remaining Metro mitigation funds and$210,000 reserve funds from South Renton Reserves. Remaining overlay streets to be added to the 2007 overlay project list. New 2006 projects: 5th&Burnett,6th& Burnett,and mid-block between 5th and 6th pending addition of$390,000 reserve funds. {Funded : (775,000 [Unfunded : 1 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six-Year Program _ ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Enq/Admin 110,000 40,000 15,000 55,000 , 55,000_ R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 530,000 225,000 305,000 305,000 Construction Eng/Admin 60,000 25,000 35,000 35,000 Other(Overlay) 75,000 75,000 75,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 775,000 40,000 265,000 470,000 395,000 75,000 - -' SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Prop. Fund Bal./Reserves 675,000 - 205,000 470,000 395,000, 75,000_ Grants In-Hand _ Mitigation In-Hand - Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed _ _ _ Other In-Hand(Metro Mitig) 100,000 40,000 60,000 _ _ Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed - _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed _- _ Undetermined '� TOTAL SOURCES 775,000 40,000 265,000 470,000 395,000 75,000- 5 Rentor,Prof*. O8.032o05 6.22 AM 5-13 FINAL i ,Y Q,N, o "IITrails Plan 1'"� �'� '-� � '`,.....?..:;.7 ' r *�; . Vis. t :C gkt j 4 . fi.t -,---.'---1,-:-':--=r'"C ti +a i � $i :i � '''- ''- '''' ' ' .1k ''''...''''''',..714"P"i''":Ai -.-,-.- d: : --,..'-.,,. -- 44,-*1_,. , . .,, S "_ ii -:. ,...:-.•-... ---f,--44.4,..-. 4--;`,"-...-..;-,,,,•, i +� tiii -x �' .+...fes ,,t�:' !t€f� ,+ �.. Ft ' ssnr 4 .�;y. i4A< S Y '' v 1 wee ? 3 ' ates, 'iI - - .l : V ,'� #i ` 4 ,i .... ...,---. ,.,_:.;:,,,. .. . . :44 '''''''. . -:-.-. '.''.-.- -, t ' ..- *. -i... ;-. -:' ,..... .'. .7.-.-.;--- :.;-,''.i,17'.-',;'.--.1.. --. ...',,-..-,' gid ' ,,,,,,,::,..„„...it-4. .7-, ■ . l . uai - 6,. : _ _._*_ ,..c,:_) .... . . . . . , _. . , . . . . . . . . . . ..... C\Documents and Settings\ttlatley\Desktop\ParksDtvn on\TradPlan • CITY OF RENTON II TRAILS MASTER PLAN 111 SEPTEMBER 1990 I 1 Community Services Sam Chastain, Administrator • City Wide Master Trails Plan I. . .��.'"s'!• 1 1' %;! l'... h,!'.4,i.'. . ; • - + . ! - •--7.--...• ; :::'-,••••:.; -..".;,•-•.,C- ` I .+.. _.. - - •_. .._ - -_ - _ r'f°• :X70•. -. f'..�'•- I Shown here is the forebay feeding pond shrub/scrub vegetation,and forested slopes of the Empire Ridge. BURNETT TRAIL From S. 2nd to S. 5th Street,Burnett is presently a linear parking lot, which needs to be unproved for pedestrians. 1 Recommended Route: The Burnett Trail will extend from From S.5th Street to its terminus at S. 7th Street,Burnett the Cedar River Trail southbound,through downtown Renton, exists as a linear park to adjacent residences,terminating at S.7th Street. Opportunities/Amenities: This linear public space offers an opportunity to extend the Burnett Linear Park concept +'. along the en tire corridor. Burnett is anchored at each end by t;•. ..•. ,,• the natural amenities of the Cedar River to the north and i;•.} is• `I'k� Burnett Linear Park to the south. These features should be :ry..A �y I . integrated rather than separated by parking lots with mini- " ' • :- •: _ mal landscape treatments or other pedestrian amenities. '. �- - Once completed,the Burnett Trail would exist as a continu- I t. _, t I i • ous linear park. • •'"' •` :•':•:..,-;: The pedestrian Corridor offers river access and picnicking I . . .I opportunities. Tonkin Park is located on the Burnett corridor adjacent to ' Ithe railroad line between S.4th Street and Williams Avenue. Burnett provides access to the Cedar River TraiL b I City Wide Master Trails Plan Burnett Linear Park,located between S.5th St.and S.7th St. PUGET POWER SUNSET TRAIL I contains play equipment,picnic tables,and benches. Constraints: Traffic,noise,and air pollution compromise Recommended Route: The trail will follow the Puget Power I the trail quality of Burnett. Also, because of the large, right-of-way and will extend from the Cedar River Crest Trail relatively unlandscaped parking areas,the aesthetic expert- north to Park Avenue,just east of the Park Avenue off ramp ence deteriorates in the Central Business District area. from northbound I-405. Feasibility: The Burnett Trail,specifically between S.2nd Opportunities/Amenities: The Puget Power Sunset Trail and S.5th, needs to be upgraded to provide a more consis- passes through an extensive greenbelt from Sunset Blvd. tent and high quality pedestrian experience along its entire northward to N.E.Park Drive. This greenbelt is comprised length. There should be more of a balance between pedes- of Puget Power and Washington State Department of Trans- j trian and parking needs. Current design favors the automo- portation right-of-way. bile significantly over the pedestrian. I The Park Ave. crossing at the northern terminus of the Parking needs for the downtown are probably the most proposed powerline trail has been pedestrianized. important factor to consider as new designs are proposed for i Burnett. Efforts to revitalize downtown will provide an The southern terminus at the Cedar Crest Trail offers pano. 1 opportunity to consider uses for this corridor. ramic views east toward Maple Valley. Neighborhoods served: Monterey Terrace, Windsor Hills, and the Highlands neighborhoods. i - • ; .A Windsor Hills Park is located within one block of the trail ../4r x Gene Coulon Park and the Lake Washington 'Nail are r• • 232 .. .yA l •. 4�` 1'4'.,? ' ° �., '1 w.'4;i'.� : 1,;'...f'• located close to the northern terminus of the Puget Power Lr t, Cr • / -•t? .t . ;, ;S `• ?., • Sunset Trail. This trail would provide a necessary non- `..� .•-,tr: $i -- .• T1.•"r u J.j' ;i i;,:' ;' motorized route to Gene Coulon Park from the Highlands. • t . s i ,.r `"'. 1, --.,. -4 `., `12 r,, `4: 7 &_' Constraints: This trail exists in its entirety along the Puget • , :' 6 • r•-0 y� , J1.1 1-._„,-,„,,t1,� Power right-of-way. The effects of exposure to high tension -:, a `:„. ,'fat '. ,da. , L : ,.ti f�_ �,?x. :-.,,,--„,„;:‘,.:P?::... ., ,-.I wires is an environmental health issue presently being re- ,..t , .,.... ,.-Ls.-.-,� "- - Searched. :4,,lt le • . . �d-,. •"ate r a _-.y« ) .' k •1- .�y;,t. i.• 4 4'i • �•"•-, �r .N\L. M` , r ��: 4,., z ti. �;ra,; i `` :;•"7.41,,,,,,i .` bi: `' 1 :►1'M`. ,,. r �4 p► tw 1 • ! `+•.. t�yQ J$L;;112c4 �r'.��:. 4 4...;--"A!.. ?'i i•: _ .'f•% 4i• h. S .• c -.�. ,i__.• 14. .` pi's. r ro Grp '« -a,:- ;a'rt .._ < `'f...,,. ,,,':�-. ►' •1' t1A.-.f. ,�• !'t,�y� • * a'k�- -T '*:1,."5:',7i .._a• .f r , y s ti 1• ' s "ji• •, =`,a^' C `- , C s..xzv ,.w Z . _ f,4 � ,. • i ...� r4:- -4,1.1i..' I 4 •;--".1.'..i,`•ct •'• 1, .' `. r . t � _ yam •I i . -.......•• - , ` s. 47sWr - . „ .. ; . t i - sw - + t.. ...,--, -,.-..1,„-,.. -.=_;r.-.' a-iY-ri; •, 7,,..,:...,:-.,..40,04..s!..:-.: `z.. • 44,-,•••;,.•.:,.. 4 V./44:V'. ' •f ,M '�?s1Y_ Zia lZ'^ � �'�..il. • * • "y� �i •=4' i 4•} i "•r, ' k Z. . �. �' ..k..� _ �i� f 14- `j ...0. - Jy� ;,- ce t�,.:,-h -, a� � �S,b,'Cr�� '." C ,� The Puget power line passes through a dense deciduous forest and could provide a major separated north-south trail for pedestrians. ( y1/ • • . I 1 I I I ip ° V { 1 I i u .. �: , 1' 7:- , � - >j'�BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH r ` ----- - _- UJ ,rz: :,-.' 7„,-_-7.-- ‘ iv I 11" \ - . W. I : r e — -- — 'nT'.-n ---_.ia He - '. - ��n,, auP PICNIC SU, � III ETT LINEAR - .. - ,,.' ., to _ e •n^ day ,EEw6rawTner. ( nu r YL— ems" N.Liii ' Y ,{� _ I� _ F _ L.0 n _ 'Y� <T.. - F _ CONCRETE vrnLxw� -e/ 'v 3 "�e GUARD WAR. M MIDH�N CRO,. _. __ '� F 411 p 1 /fir �r i R G' 1 I 1 1 I I GRAPHIC SCALE a a a r a 40 Rom I Ad,NIL REVIBIONe. DATE \ ._—_— ----- CUUENTAOENCY MacLeod IIBURNETT LINEAR PARK Reckord = m * u cepa aaxT«u 6N� �" SCHEMATIC DESIGN , tiTY J '+ Trails Plan „N'1�.. . ., . , . . „i„..I.,...., ,,..„ .• 4 r .' " 1 ' ' ' . ' ' '' ' - ''* ' ..1".AS:62n '''I "tigiti if ' iitOrifti '.4**--j'-'"''''' ' ' '' ' '''''''''-'''''''-'''' .w t a +11,1 'y 7 > ita L 3Illitr' ....A-. ati � t , ; ii. 191 *Ai 11 - h � - a a . i u a • 1 ril iL gm.. 6,, . . . ■ aaaaa amommommime * , C:\Documents and Scttmgs\tflatley\DesktoP\ParksDivts on\TradPlun —.—_— . , • , . . • 1 . 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I : I I • I I I I • I I I I 8 I " , 1 I , S,-.M11 PIM,--1,06"- I 1 0 6',611-.,,-I - I ", 33 . "V124.2-\I, C 8 8;,, .' E.32 7 I 5 c-91.._^e .. 4 I .. r, . SOW 110., 3,r . ' / I r', I ir it,2'5 r2 I 1 L / , ‘,..e-i-,1., 3,H I._ _ _J - -3,,' ' .. ----:t7'12"---.:76I.:-.=--=-7-- --,C..I j ii• 1E 67:16,11:23:9°6 . L.,.... ,, 1-7,-....... .. 61 6 'Ii' 9 i 1E I WIN-24 4 1 .114 if st44---A A 44----:-._--......__ ,„... .-... — I/ ' ' 'kW --.... . ' `,4‘ r SHE SENCHRARP -1 ,,,'" --..-- -Ms.._I. 1 . ., ---- : - I. --, SSW RtIP,34 03-. 111 I = • .• -/... •;4! . - - ---- - :. 1E 6-1.1.•29 6 LLI ,i L., -2.- , n- , ,•,,,to, ... - • 1E r It••26 9 rt 1 1 . --., ......,__ le 45"t.-27.8 37 ( -, , 1 • IT `.., Lu 9,5_5+.27.5I • MOUND4 • - C — --,71. \ '4,-, _ -.'; k-1 ct) I I Ir , i:,..._,,,,,,, 0 4'5,, 'I l'U!'.''7 3'7'. ! eft, m, --- ,.. ...,__,,, ...-i• i I . -.. ---1--...,,.if ! F- '' . ' •,,T,c.,.. .:. 77":". --.--., . , . 1,1: -0-'''. '••••• . ,k .m. ' 10"' •'d. • • 1,1,011. ''" ; X It I i..ti y I. _ . _ z 10066 CASED 4-50 1 TS COHI:11,-61,91%, . -511. L.- - - ..i.- i, :7 --, - -I-, '4. ., i ,4 PPAbs cm (i) ..----- m )EXISTINGTREES — _. ____ 0 METRO SSMH R161 tE.32 90— 0- 50 , I s - W -'--------L6-.I.--:-.-_ g g a i - , I I I -.— . CB RIM-32.,3- 3,, r I 9 --. I .-• 1-1 ,o-i----4.4-____ 1E...30 5 I I --SI•Ali 665 1 \ II '\ 1 1 1 ,, :•-i ,.. I ROT m 26, I V I g 1 • • S' I I .. I I I I I I 1 I I I I I s I I I I I I 1 14 I , , 1 I 1 I .....: I , I TT 1 I I 1 . I 1 I '1 I BURNETT LINEAR PARK REVISIONS: DATE CLIENT AGENCY: SCHEMATIC DESIGN IIN I smiNillommilmillmilmomilll , millININ1111.11111111limmolli J. NNIIIINIIIIIIIIEEIIIIIIIIIIIMININI miNNINIIIIINENIIIIIIIIMI CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: CIJ • Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board Utility Systems Division/Water Utility March 6, 2006 Staff Contact Abdoul Gafour, x7210 Agenda Status J.D. Wilson,x7295 Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Engineering Consultant Agreement with HDR Engineering, Correspondence.. Inc., for Well 5A Water Treatment Improvements Ordinance Phase 1 —Bench Scale & Pilot Plant Study Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue paper Study Sessions Engineering Consultant Agreement Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept X Risk Management Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required $59,540.00 (this contract) Transfer/Amendment N/A Amount Budgeted $350,000(2006 total budget)) Revenue Generated N/A Total Project Budget $350,000(2006) City Share Total $59,540.00 Account No. Project 425.00500.018.5960.0034.65.055565 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Water Utility requests Council's approval of an Engineering Consultant Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc., in the amount of$59,540.00,to conduct bench scale testing and pilot plant study to determine the best treatment method to improve the water quality of Well 5A. The Water Utility selected HDR Engineering, Inc. as the most highly qualified firm to provide the required services in accordance with City Policy#250-02, Bidding and Contracting Requirements, for public works projects. The Water Utility has budgeted sufficient funds in our 2006 Capital Improvement Program budget to cover the cost of the consultant contract. The total 2006 budget for this project is$350,000.00, account no. #425.00500.018.5960.0034.65.055565. Although HDR Engineering, Inc. was selected to provide engineering services for the entire project, the Water Utility will be coming back to Council to request the approval of separate contracts with HDR Engineering, Inc.,along with the approval of funding for each of the next phases of the project. . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consultant Agreement, in the amount of$59,540.00,with HDR Engineering, Inc. H:\File Sys\WTR-Drinking Water Utility\WTR-13-Studies&Project Development\WTR-13-0090-Well 5A Water Treatment Improvements\Phase I\Agenda Bill-Well 5A Phase I Consultant Agreement.doc\AGtp f O� PLANNING/BUILDING/ , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • MEMORANDUM DATE: February 24, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmermaistrator STAFF CONTACT: Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor(ext. 7210) J.D. Wilson, Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7295) SUBJECT: Consultant Agreement for Well 5A Water Treatment Improvements Phase I —Bench Scale and Pilot Plant Study ISSUE: Should Council approve an engineering consultant agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc., to perform water quality testing and pilot plant study to determine the best treatment method to improve the water quality of Well 5A? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Engineering Consultant Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc., in the amount of$59,450.00, to perform bench scale testing and pilot study to determine the best method to improve the water quality of Well 5A. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Water from the City's Well 5A, located at NE 24th' Street and Jones Avenue NE (see attached map), contains naturally occurring iron, manganese, hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. The current water treatment method does not produce finished water meeting aesthetic water quality standards. The water has a bad taste and odor, and stains customers' laundry, dishes and plumbing fixtures, therefore the City has not supplied water from Well 5A to our customers since the redevelopment of the well and the construction of the pump station in 1991. Well 5A can produce 1,500 gallons per minute or 2.16 million gallons of water per day, and it is an important source of water supply for the City, as more customer connections are added to our water system. In 2005, the Water Utility solicited proposals from engineering consultant firms according to City Policy #250-02, 02, Bidding and Contracting Requirements, for public Council/Well 5A Study February 24,2006 • Page 2 of 2 works projects. The selection committee reviewed proposals from four firms, interviewed the top two ranked firms and selected HDR Engineering, Inc. as the firm most highly qualified to provide the required services. Under this contract for Phase 1 of the project,the consultant will conduct a bench-scale and pilot plant study to determine the most appropriate treatment technologies to improve the water quality of Well 5A. The study will use both laboratory analyses and a"Taste and Odor Panel" (a group of about 10 people who will rate the taste and odor of the treated water)to evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment technologies. The Water Utility has budgeted $350,000 in our 2006 Capital Improvement Program budget, to cover costs related to this consultant contract and costs related to the anticipated next phase for the design of the project. The estimated cost plus fixed fee contract with HDR Engineering, Inc. for the Phase 1 study is $59,540.00. In addition to Phase 1 study contract with HDR Engineering, Inc. the City will hire a pumps-contractor to remove the existing large pump motor and columns from the well casing. The pumps-contractor will install a small, low-volume pump in the well casing with temporary power to provide the pilot plant with a continuous supply of water without overflowing the drainage system. Upon the completion of the pilot study, the pumps-contractor will remove the temporary low volume pump and re-install the original pump motor and columns in the well casing. The estimated cost of the contract with the pumps-contractor is $30,000.00. After the completion of this consultant contract for Phase 1 study, the City will be able to select the most efficient treatment train option to meet the finished water quality goals. Although the City's selection committee has selected HDR Engineering, Inc. to provide engineering services for the next phases of the project, the Water Utility will be coming back to Council to request the approval of separate contracts with HDR Engineering, Inc., along with the approval of funding for each phase of the project. The next phases of the project consist of: • Phase 2—Treatment technology selection and development of preliminary cost estimate (2006). • Phase 3 —Design and preparation of construction plans, specifications, cost estimate and construction bid package (2007). • Phase 4—Construction and plant start-up(2007 to 2008). The Water Utility's planning level cost estimate for the entire project, phases 1 to 4, is about $4,250,000. CONCLUSION: The bench scale testing and pilot-study for Well 5A is needed in order to determine the best treatment method to improve the water quality of this important source of water supply. The study will allow the City to evaluate the efficacy of treatment options, and costs related to the design and construction of additional water quality treatment facility for Well 5A. Attachment cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director H:\File Sys\WTR-Drinking Water Utility\WTR-13-Studies&Project Development\WTR-13-0090-Well 5A Water Treatment Improvements\Phase I\Revised Issue Paper for Well SA Phase I Consultant Agreement.doc\AGtp -/J 34TH( iJE331 9 ST Ai 3/5T ST • �i k/E 3/5T ST v� iv 30_,.//'. Z 5T 6 ill Ze3774 /JE ZETH ST 5T N Nr_ N E 27TH ST Z7 CT RENTON WELL 5A ktr\tS°1 ku ( to 1)- NE 124TH ST 0to - c Q Q � W NE ZOTK 5T VICINITY MAP i r gilt r t ,!, ':. F $ ;.� ti da k -0 , I! Ail:. f {7t 1F , ' E t �`. ' '; !♦Y jk' 1 hr/ F`�5 } ot 4Ati 1 011: ,,,,z:,:... .'-' '''', - -, ,,..,_. ,h :- ' ‘.11': i ,to i Y ufr 1, .- ice .:.. WELL 5A PUMP STATION NE 24TH St. & JONES AVE.N EXISTING E • aniv. ENGINEERING 44110 ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into on this ,day of , 2006,by and between the CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON,A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "CITY," and HDR Engineering, Inc. whose address is 500— 108th Avenue Northeast, Suite 1200, Bellevue, WA 98004-5549, at which work will be available for inspection,hereinafter called the"CONSULTANT." PROJECT NAME: Well 5A Water Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench Scale&Pilot Plant Study WHEREAS,the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance of a qualified professional consulting firm to do the necessary engineering work for the project, and WHEREAS,the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents,that it is in full compliance with the statutes of the State of Washington for registration of professional engineers,has a current valid corporate certificate from the State of Washington or has a valid assumed name filing with the Secretary of State and that all personnel to be assigned to the work required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the work to which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner,and that sufficient qualified personnel are on staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement. WHEREAS,the Consultant has indicated that it desires to do the work set forth in the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth below. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms,conditions, covenants and performances contained herein below, the parties hereto agree as follows: I SCOPE OF WORK The Consultant shall furnish, and hereby warrants that it has,the necessary equipment,materials,and professionally trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The Consultant shall perform all work described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and amendments to local and state regulations,guidelines and policies. The Consultant shall prepare such information and studies as it may deem pertinent and necessary, in order to pass judgment in a sound engineering manner on the features of the work. The Consultant shall make such minor changes,amendments or revisions in the detail of the work as may be required by the City. This item does not constitute an "Extra Work" item as related in Section VIII of the Agreement. The work shall be verified for accuracy by a complete check by the Consultant. The Consultant will be held responsible for the accuracy of the work,even though the work has been accepted by the City. II DESIGN CRITERIA The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the work needed. Reports and plans,to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of local and State regulations, guidelines,and specifications, including,but not limited to the following: Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 1. Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association(WSDOT/APWA), "Standard Specifications for Road,Bridge,and Municipal Construction,"as amended by Renton Standard Specification. 2. WSDOT/APWA, "Standard Plans for Road,Bridge and Municipal Construction." 3. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual." 4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges." 5. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Bridge Design Manual,Volumes 1 and 2." 6. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual of Highways Hydraulics," except hydrologic analysis as described in item 14. 7. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline." 8. Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual." 9. U.S.Department of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration, "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways." 10. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual." 11. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines." 12. Standard drawings prepared by the City and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all cases where they fit design conditions. Renton Design Standards,and Renton Specifications shall be used as they pertain. 13. Metro Transit,design criteria. 14. King County Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1,and Chapters 3,4, and 5. 15. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets." III ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT BY THE CITY The City will furnish the Consultant copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the preparation of the plans, studies, specifications, and estimates within the limits of the assigned work. All other records needed for the study must be obtained by the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with other available sources to obtain data or records available to those agencies. The Consultant shall be responsible for this and any other data collection to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. City will provide to Consultant all data in City's possession relating to Consultants services on the project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the accuracy,timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the City. Should field studies be needed,the Consultant will perform such work to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. The City will not be obligated to perform any such field studies. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 2 IV • OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material, including working documents,notes,maps,drawings,photo,photographic negatives,etc. used in the project, shall become and remain the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction. Any use of such documents by the City not directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any liability whatsoever to the Consultant. All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing-arrow symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be printed on both sides of the recycled paper, as feasible. V TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed according to Exhibit B,Time Schedule of Completion, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services are to be completed and all products shall be delivered by the Consultant unless there are delays due to factors that are beyond the control of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin work under the terms of this Agreement until authorized in writing by the City. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed,the Consultant is delayed in the performance of its services by factors that are beyond its control,the Consultant shall notify the City of the delay and shall prepare a revised estimate of the time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to the City for its approval. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as otherwise herein. Delays attributable to or caused by one of the parties hereto amounting to 30 days or more affecting the completion of the work may be considered a cause for renegotiation or termination of this Agreement by the other party. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 3 VI PAYMENT The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter as specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies,equipment,and incidentals necessary to complete the work. All billings for compensation for work performed under this Agreement will list actual time(days and/or hours)and dates during which the work was performed and the compensation shall be figured using the rates in Exhibit C. Payment for this work shall not exceed$59,540.00 without a written amendment to this contract,agreed to and signed by both parties. Cost Plus Net Fee Payment for work accomplished shall be on the basis of the Consultant's actual cost plus a net fee. The actual cost includes direct salary cost, overhead,and direct non-salary cost. 1. The direct salary cost is the salary expense for professional and technical personnel and principals for the time they are productively engaged in the work necessary to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. The direct salary costs are set forth in the attached Exhibit C and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. 2. The overhead costs as identified on Exhibit C are determined as 175.00 percent of the direct salary cost and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. The overhead cost rate is an estimate based on currently available accounting information and shall be used for all progress payments over the period of the contract. 3. The direct non-salary costs are those costs directly incurred in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement, including,but not limited to travel,reproduction,telephone, supplies,and fees of outside consultants. The direct non-salary costs are specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Billings for any direct non-salary costs shall be supported by copies of original bills or invoices. Reimbursement for outside consultants and services shall be on the basis of times the invoiced amount. 4. The net fee,which represents the Consultants profit shall be 12 percent of direct salary plus overhead costs. This fee is based on the Scope of Work and the estimated labor hours therein. In the event a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the Consultant,the supplemental agreement will include provision for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The net fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of the project completed as estimated in the Consultant's monthly progress reports and approved by the City. Any portion of the net fee not previously paid in the monthly payments shall be included in the final payment, subject to the provisions of Section XI entitled TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. 5. Progress payments may be claimed monthly for direct costs actually incurred to date as supported by detailed statements, for overhead costs and for a proportionate amount of the net fee payable to the Consultant based on the estimated percentage of the completion of the services to date. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification by the City after completion and acceptance by the City of the work under this Agreement. Acceptance, by the Consultant of final payment shall constitute full and final satisfaction of all amounts due or claimed to be due. Payment for extra work performed under this Agreement shall be paid as agreed to by the parties hereto in writing at the time extra work is authorized. (Section VIII "EXTRA WORK"). A short narrative progress report shall accompany each voucher for progress payment. The report shall include discussion of any problems and potential causes for delay. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 4 . To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for consultant employees, the City may conduct employee interviews. Acceptance of such final payment by the Consultant shall constitute a release of all claims of any nature,related to this Agreement,which the Consultant may have against the City unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the City by the Consultant prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not,however, be a bar to any claims that the City may have against the Consultant or to any remedies the City may pursue with respect to such claims. The Consultant and its subconsultants shall keep available for inspection, by the City, for a period of three years after final payment,the cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement and all items related to,or bearing upon, these records. If any litigation,claim or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year retention period,the records shall be retained until all litigation,claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. The three-year retention period starts when the Consultant receives final payment. VII CHANGES IN WORK The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the completed work of this Agreement as are necessary to correct errors appearing therein,when required to do so by the City,without additional compensation. Should the City find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof revised,the Consultant shall make such revisions, if requested and as directed by the City in writing. This work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as provided in Section VIII. VIII EXTRA WORK The City may desire to have the Consultant perform work or render services in connection with the Project in addition to or other than work provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Work. Such work will be considered as Extra Work and will be specified in a written supplement which will set forth the nature and scope thereof. Work under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to whether work is Extra Work or work already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the work is undertaken. Performance of the work by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any claim by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Work. IX EMPLOYMENT The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant,to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person,other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration,contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty,the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees,while so engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the Consultant's employees,while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 5 The Consultant shall not engage,on a full or part-time basis,or other basis,during the period of the contract,any professional or technical personnel who are,or have been at any time during the period of this contract, in the employ of the City except regularly retired employees,without written consent of the City. If during the time period of this Agreement,the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional,technical, or clerical staff as a result of this work,the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement and interview process. X NONDISCRIMINATION The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client,employee or applicant for employment or for services because of race,creed,color,national origin,marital status, sex,age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational qualification with regard to,but not limited to the following: employment upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or termination's;rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training;rendition of services. The Consultant understands and agrees that if it violates this Non- Discrimination provision,this Agreement may be terminated by the City and further that the Consultant shall be barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future,unless a showing is made satisfactory to the City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely. XI TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten(10)days written notice to the Consultant, subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with subparagraphs C and D below. B. In the event of the death of a member,partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project,the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving members of the Consultant,with the City's concurrence,desire to terminate this Agreement,payment shall be made as set forth in Subsection C of this section. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 6 • C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City other than for fault on the part of the Consultant, a final payment shall be made to the Consultant for actual cost for the work complete at the time of termination of the Agreement,plus the following described portion of the net fee. The portion of the net fee for which the Consultant shall be paid shall be the same ratio to the total net fee as the work complete is to the total work required by the Agreement. In addition,the Consultant shall be paid on the same basis as above for any authorized extra work completed. No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten(10)days following receipt by the Consultant of the Notice to Terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the Consultant prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due as set forth herein above,then no final payment shall be due and the Consultant shall immediately reimburse the City for any excess paid. D. In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the Consultant,the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in performing the work to the date of termination,the amount of work originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination,whether that work is in a form or of a type which is usable to the City at the time of termination,the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete the work required and the time which may be required to do so,and other factors which affect the value to the City of the work performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set forth in subsection C above had been applied. E. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work,the original copies of all Engineering plans,reports and documents prepared by the Consultant prior to termination shall become the property of the City for its use without restriction. Such unrestricted use not occurring as a part of this project, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. F. Payment for any part of the work by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies of any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant,or for failure of the Consultant to perform work required of it by the City. Forbearance of any rights under the Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the Consultant. XII DISPUTES Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with work not disposed of by agreement between the Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Director of Planning/Building/Public Works or his/her successors and delegees,whose decision in the matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties to this Agreement. In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this Agreement, both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, situated in King County. XIII LEGAL RELATIONS The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington. The Consultant agrees to indemnify,defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 7 from the Consultant's errors,omissions,or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims,demands or suits based upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of(a)the Consultant's agents or employees and(b)the City, its agents, officers and employees,this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees except as limited below. The Consultant shall secure general liability,property damage,auto liability,and professional liability coverage in the amount of$1.0 million,with a General Aggregate in the amount of$2.0 million, unless waived or reduced by the City. The Consultant shall submit a completed City of Renton Insurance Information Form,and the Standard Acord Certification Form prior to the execution of the contract. The City of Renton shall be named as an"Additional Insured"on all contracts/projects. The Consultant's insurance policy shall be endorsed to add the City of Renton as an Additional Insured.A copy of the endorsement shall be provided to the City. The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of relevant insurance policies to the City within 30 days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and Declaration page(s)shall be in a form as approved by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration page(s)on file from a previous contract and no changes in insurance coverage has occurred, only the Certification Form will be required. The limits of said insurance shall not,however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder. All coverages provided by the Consultant shall be in a form,and underwritten by a company acceptable to the City. The City will normally require carriers to have minimum A.M. Best rating of A XII. The Consultant shall keep all required coverages in full force and effect during the life of this project,and a minimum of forty five days'written notice shall be given to the City prior to the cancellation of any policy. The Consultant shall verify,when submitting first payment invoice and annually thereafter,possession of a current City of Renton business license while conducting work for the City. The Consultant shall require,and provide verification upon request,that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton business license. The Consultant shall provide,and obtain City approval of, a traffic control plan prior to conducting work in City right-of-way. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 8 • XIV SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement without the express consent of the City. XV ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS The Consultant shall place their certification on all plans, specifications,estimates or any other engineering data furnished by them in accordance with RCW 18.43.070. XVI COMPLETE AGREEMENT This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations,and provisions agreed upon by the parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement. No agent,or representative of either party has authority to make,and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for,any statement,representation,promise,or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this Agreement. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. XVII EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts,each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby ratify and adopt all statements,representations, warranties,covenants,and agreements contained in the Request for Qualifications,and the supporting materials submitted by the Consultant,and does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. } ON ULTAI�VT 7: ' CITY OF RENTON t z.! / ' Signature Date Kathy Keolker, Mayor Date Dave Peters, Vice President ATTEST: Title Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 9 Exhibit A Scope of Services Phase 1 - Bench-Scale and Pilot Plant Testing Purpose and Approach The purpose of Phase 1 of the Well 5A Treatment Improvements Project is to evaluate different alternatives for treating the water from Well 5A and establish the most feasible treatment alternative to achieve Renton's water quality goals. The tasks and work elements to be performed by the Consultant are described below. Outlined for each task are the summary, work elements, responsibilities of the City (where applicable), and products. Unless otherwise noted, all items listed under the "Work Elements" section for each task will be performed by the Consultant. Task 1-100: Phase 1 Project Management and QA/QC Summary: Perform the management, coordination, administrative, and quality control functions necessary to achieve successful completion of high-quality Phase 1 work. HDR Services: • Prepare a Project Guide, including a project scope and schedule. • Initiate and attend up to two (2) project coordination meetings and prepare monthly progress reports. • Conduct an internal review to focus on opportunities for cost savings, added value, improved operation and maintenance, and constructability. • Conduct internal quality control reviews on the bench and pilot test plans and test reports and on the Taste and Odor(T&O) Panel methodology. Deliverables: • Project Guide. • Copies of correspondence and records of key decisions, as requested by the City. • Monthly budget status reports. Task 1-200: Bench-Scale Testing Summary: Perform bench-scale tests to confirm the water quality of Well 5A and determine operational parameters for the pilot plant testing. HDR Services: • Perform bench-scale testing to confirm and/or evaluate the Well 5A water quality and to determine pilot plant testing parameters. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 10 , • Identify and develop viable treatment process options for manganese and iron removal, hydrogen sulfide removal, ammonia removal, removal of other contaminants (arsenic, radon) if required, secondary disinfection, corrosion control, and process wastewater/residuals disposal. • Prepare a bench-scale testing technical memorandum that documents the water quality characteristics and provides recommendations for the specific treatment processes to evaluate in the pilot testing (Task 1-300). Deliverables: • Bench-scale testing technical memorandum (5 hard copies and/or pdf file). City Responsibilities: • Operate the installed well production pump for periods long enough to obtain representative water samples to use in bench-scale testing. Task 1-300: Pilot Plant Testing Summary: Perform pilot plant tests to determine the most appropriate and feasible treatment processes to meet Renton's water quality and operational objectives and to verify design parameters. HDR Services: • Pilot Testing: Based on the treatment process options and recommendations developed in Task 1- 200, conduct a pilot-testing program for the removal of iron, manganese, sulfide, and ammonia. Pilot testing will utilize water from Well 5A and will evaluate: oxidant requirements, sulfide removal processes, iron and manganese removal processes, and ammonia removal process. The pilot testing effort will also determine the impact of treatment on other potential water quality regulatory issues including the Lead and Copper Rule, Disinfection/Disinfection By-Products Rule, and the Groundwater Rule. • Water Quality Characterization: During the pilot study, water from Well 5A will be analyzed in the field daily for iron, manganese, sulfide, ammonia, pH, and temperature to determine if there are variations in the water quality that may impact treatment requirements. A total of three samples will be collected from the well and analyzed in a commercial laboratory for TOC, organic nitrogen, radon-222, and arsenic. • Taste and Odor Panel: Concurrent with the pilot runs, a taste and odor evaluation will be performed and a T&O Panel formed. The Panel will include 6 to 12 individuals (customers in the affected service area and City employees) and will meet four times during the pilot testing period for this evaluation. The Panel will evaluate untreated well water, water treated by the pilot plant (both non-aerated and aerated), water from a consistent point supplied by the downtown wells, and bottled water in a blind taste test. The bottled water used for each test will be the same brand supplied from the same source. • Wrap-up Meeting: Hold a wrap-up meeting to review the results of the pilot testing and T&O evaluations. Facilitate decisions by the City as to the most appropriate treatment methods for Well 5A based on the technical results of Phase 1. • Test Report: A Pilot Test Report will include the water quality characterization, results from the T&O panel, and the design criteria determined by the piloting. Deliverables: • Pilot Test Report. • Taste and odor evaluation protocol. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant I 1 City Responsibilities: • Remove the existing production pump at Well 5A and install a smaller capacity temporary pump to provide water for the pilot testing. • Make access available to the Well 5A building to the Consultant. • Identify individuals to serve on the T&O panel, organize and schedule the T&O panel, and provide a meeting room at City Hall or the City Shops to conduct the T&O evaluations. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 12 EXHIBIT B Well 5A Water Treatment Improvements— Phase 1—Bench-Scale and Pilot Plant Testing SCHEDULE Task Estimated Start Estimated Completion Notice to Proceed January 16, 2006 1-100—Phase 1 Project Management January 16,2006 April 14,2006 and QA/QC 1-200—Bench-Scale Testing \ January 16, 2006 February 17, 2006 1-300—Pilot-Scale Testing February 6, 2006 April 14,2006 y h,0(` 10 tAl SS C^ °" (0-f t w Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 13 EXHIBIT C COST PLUS NET FEE DETERMINATION DIRECT SALARY COST: Classification Hourly Rate Project Manager $61.94 Project Manager $55.75 Senior Engineer—Process $40.80 Staff Engineer-Process $32.22 CAD Designer—Civil/ $29.15 Mechanical Admin. Support $25.44 Net Fee: 12%of direct salary cost plus overhead DIRECT NON-SALARY COST: Cost Element Unit Cost Cost Element Unit Cost In-house copies—B&W $0.10 each Mileage(IRS Rate) $0.445/mile In-house copies—Color $1.00 each In-house 11 x 17 copies $0.50 each Other direct expenses, including telephone, fax, postage, supplies,meals, lodging, and airfare are charged at cost. The direct salary costs set forth in Exhibit C reflect the Consultant's 2006 salary rates. Should the work extend into 2007 as a result of factors beyond the control of the Consultant, the actual cost for work performed after this date shall be based on the Consultant's 2007 salary cost plus net fee of 12%. Reimbursement for work and services provided by all subconsultants will be 1.02 times the invoiced amount. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 14 • EXHIBIT C(cont.) SUMMARY OF FEE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BREAKDOWN OF OVERHEAD COST Administrative Salaries 40.10% Holiday, Sick&Vacation Pay 14.78% Bid&Proposal Costs 4.69% Advertising Costs 0.00% Staff Bonus 0.00% Payroll Taxes 12.68% 401(k) 0.00% Employee Insurance&Benefits 8.72% Recruiting 0.00% Insurance 3.86% Dues&Professional Meetings 0.00% Publications 0.13% Rent 17.78% Office Supplies&Postage 1.17% Training&Education 0.00% Trade, Business,Technical&Professional Activities 2.81% Computer Expense 9.34% Telephone 1.23% Equipment Maintenance&Depreciation 1.09% Professional Services 0.65% State B&O taxes and other Business taxes 7.70% Travel&Auto Expense 2.61% Corporate Expenses(salaries, fringe benefits, professional services) 45.66% TOTAL 175.00% SUMMARY OF COSTS Direct Salary Cost $13,689.00 Overhead Cost(including payroll additives) 175.00% $23,956.00 Subtotal $37,645.00 Net Fee 12% $4,517.00 Direct Non-Salary Costs a. Misc. reproductions, CAD plotting, mileage, equipment, etc. $3,771.00 b. Subconsultants(Kennedy/Jenks,Zipper Zeman Associates, ESM Engineering) $13,607.00 Subtotal $17,378.00 GRAND TOTAL $59,540.00 Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 15 Table C-1 City of Renton Well 5A Water Treatment Improvements Phase 1 -Bench-Scale and Pilot-Scale Testing Budget and Fee Breakdown Prepared: 1/10/2006 Tasks Description Estimated Labor Hours Cost Plus Fee Determination Staff Project Project Sr.Eng Staff Eng CADD Admin. Total Labor Total Overhead Subtotal Net Fee Total Labor Direct Total Description Principal Manager Process Process Designer Support (hours) Salary Costs Costs©175% Salary Costs @ 12% Cost Expenses Cost Salary Rate/hr 61.94 55.75 40.80 32.22 29.15 25.44 Phase 1 Bench-Scale and Pilot-Scale 1 28 141 177 0 24 371 13,689 23,956 37,845 4,517 42,182 17,378 59,540 Testing 1-100 Phase 1 PM and QA/QC 1 26 36 0 0 16 79 3,387 5,928 9,315 1,118 10,433 1,991 $12,424 1-200 Bench-Scale Testing 0 0 22 39 0 3 64 2,231 3,903 6,134 736 6,870 3,212 $10,082 1-300 Pilot-Scale Testing 0 2 83 138 0 5 228 8,071 14,125 22,197 2,664 24,860 12,175 $37,035 16 Table C-2 City of Renton Well 5A Water Treatment Improvements Phase 1 - Bench-Scale and Pilot-Scale Testing Direct Expense Breakdown Tasks Description Kennedy/Jenks Testing Technical Copying/ Travel Total (subconsultant) Equipment Costs Printing Costs Bench-Scale and Pilot-Scale Phase 1 Testing 1-100 Phase 1 PM and QA/QC 1,637 0 324 20 10 1,991 1-200 Bench-Scale Testing 2,740 150 262 20 40 3,212 1-300 Pilot-Scale Testing 9,230 1,626 939 180 200 12,175 Totals 13,607 1,776 1,525 220 250 17,378 17 RESOLUTION NO. 3229 CITY OF RENTON SUMMARY OF FAIR PRACTICES POLICY ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 3229 It is the policy of the City of Renton to promote and provide equal treatment and service to all citizens and to ensure equal employment opportunity to all persons without regard to race, color, national origin, ethnic background, gender, marital status, religion, age or disability, when the City of Renton can reasonably accommodate the disability, of employees and applicants for employment and fair, non-discriminatory treatment to all citizens. All departments of the City of Renton shall adhere to the following guidelines: (1) EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - The City of Renton will ensure all employment related activities included recruitment, selection, promotion, demotion, training, retention and separation are conducted in a manner which is based on job-related criteria which does not discriminate against women, minorities and other protected classes. Human resources decisions will be in accordance with individual performance, staffing requirements, governing civil service rules,and labor contract agreements. (2) COOPERATION WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS - The City of Renton will cooperate fully with all organizations and commissions organized to promote fair practices and equal opportunity in employment. (3) AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN - The City of Renton Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program will be maintained and administered to facilitate equitable representation with the City work force and to assure equal employment opportunity to all. It shall be the responsibility of elected officials, the Mayor, the Affirmative Action Officer, department administrators, managers, supervisors, Contract Compliance Officers and all employees to carry out the policies, guidelines and corrective measures set forth in the Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program. (4) CONTRACTORS' OBLIGATIONS - Contractors, sub-contractors, consultants and suppliers conducting business with the City of Renton shall affirm and subscribe to the Fair Practices and Non-discrimination policies set forth by the law and in the City's Affirmative Action Plan and Equal Employment Program. Copies of this policy shall be distributed to all City employees, shall appear in all operational documentation of the City, including bid calls,and shall be prominently displayed in appropriate city facilities. CONCURRED IN by the City Council of the City of RENTON, Washington, this 7thday of October, 1996. CITY OF RENTON: RENTON CITY COUNCIL: IV(ayor Council President Attest: ita-412'.v V City Cler Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase I—Bench&Pilot Plant 18 • '0Y o ‘ AFFIDAVIT O�'1FCOMPLIANCE HDR Engineering, Inc. hereby confirms and declares that (Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) I. It is HDR Engineering, Inc. policy to offer equal (Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) opportunity to all qualified employees and applicants for employment without regard to the race, creed, color, sex,national origin,age,disability or veteran status. H. HDR Engineering,Inc. complies with all applicable federal, (Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) state and local laws governing non-discrimination in employment. H. When applicable, HDR Engineering, Inc. will seek out and (Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant/supplier) negotiate with minority and women contractors for the award of subcontracts. David A. Peters, Vice President Phi't Agent/Representa 's Name and Title (.)," , Agent/Repres ntat' e s Sigtlia ure Instructions: This document MUST be completed by each contractor, subcontractor, consultant and/or supplier. Include or attach this document(s)with the contract. Well 5A Treatment Improvements—Phase 1—Bench&Pilot Plant 19 -lV 34TH1 ki _ T U S IJE.33�'D ST • 'IQ AI 315T ST Zi AIE 3/57 ST of N 30TH - - Z 5T r2E- Z6 Al Z5774 /JE ZSTH" ST ST N NE NE 27TH ST 27 cT 111 RENTON WELL 5A 13.. (. . Q ) NE 124TH ST. 1 kJ O Q j NE ZOTH. ST • VICINITY MAP : x . rix 1 ' IL ‘ Old' w• r :,ti '1. •y ,t ti , ,sat 4 t `ori. �. 4' ' i t 't,,,, `. 'Fs.,: ' ' y r,. _' t �,.'.. '' 3 „1,,,,,.,,.... f EXISTING WELL 5A PUMP STATION NE 24TH St. &JONES AVE.NE C:O CiL 1 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Date 3-'- WO COMMITTEE REPORT March 6,2006 Ordinance on Exempting the Police and Fire Chiefs of the.City of Renton from Civil Service (Referred February 6,2006) The Public Safety Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt an ordinance exempting the Police and Fire Chiefs of the City of Renton from Civil Service. (r A/at L t Denis W. Law, Chair Toni Nelson,Vice Cha' Don Persson, Member C: Mike Webby Eileen Flott Gretel Sloan A ' OVER BY _1 Citi,'COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date ,3-4.-,20010 .1 COMMITTEEE REPORT March 6,2006 Renton Municipal Airport Uses Zoning Text Amendments (Referred 9/24/01) The Planning and Development Committee concurs with the staff recommendation to revise the Medium Industrial zone(IM)to allow the municipal airport and airplane sales and repair as permitted uses in the IM zone; airport-related and aviation-related uses as accessory uses in the IM zone; and airplane manufacturing as an accessory use in the IM zone, with a note of exception for the area south of I-405 and north of SW 16t Street. Revisions also include deleting airplane sales and repair from the Heavy Industrial zone and deleting municipal airports from the Center Downtown zone. The Committee further recommends that the ordinance regarding this matter be prepared for first reading. Terri Briere, Chair e/b" — Dan Clawson, Vice-Chair Marcie Palmer, Member cc: Alex Pietsch Neil Watts Rebecca Lind Ildo pie d 3-6-0206 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 37.13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT FOR THE EASTSIDE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City of Renton recognizes that multijurisdictional transportation planning and the development of a multijurisdictional transportation plan for the Eastside is of benefit to the citizens of the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the Eastside Transportation Program was formed in 1987 to serve as a central forum to resolve transportation issues and establish priorities for transportation projects and programs on a subregional basis; and WHEREAS,the 1987 agreement was modified in 1996 and 1999; and WHEREAS, the Eastside Transportation Program's primary focus has been shifted from updating the Eastside Transportation Program recommendations to implementing the identified priorities of those recommendations through education and advocacy; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and advisable to amend the prior agreements for the Eastside Transportation Program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into the 2006-2009 Agreement for the Eastside Transportation Program. 1 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney RES.1160:2/27/06:ma 2 /dop d 3-6-"a6 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 377' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BOARD. WHEREAS, the City of Renton recognizes that multijurisdictional transportation planning and coordination is beneficial to the City; and WHEREAS, Renton and South King County have a history of multijurisdictional transportation planning dating back to the late 1970s; and WHEREAS, King County, Metro, WSDOT and the cities of Auburn, Des Moines, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and SeaTac have demonstrated, through the South County Area Transportation Benefit District Steering Committee and program development effort, the benefits that can be achieved by regional coordination; and WHEREAS, the enormous cost of many of the needed transportation improvements and their importance to the South King County as a whole demonstrate the need for a cooperative approach to planning, financing, and construction of these improvements; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to share information and continue the coordination effort that Renton maintains with other South County jurisdictions and related regional agencies; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and advisable to amend the prior agreements for the South King County Transportation Board; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into the 2006-2009 Agreement for the South County Area Transportation Board for the purpose of information-sharing, coordination, and consensus-building on transportation issues with other South County jurisdictions and related regional agencies. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of ,2006. Kathy Keolker,Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney RES.1161:2/27/06:ma 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON VACATING A PORTION OF JERICHO AVENUE NE, SOUTH OF NE 4`� STREET. (MIKE ROMANO, CENTURION DEVELOPMENT SVCS.; VAC 05-005) WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of Jericho Avenue NE, south of NE 4th Street, was filed with the City Clerk on December 23, 2005, and that petition was signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds(2/3)of the property abutting upon the street or alley to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3787, passed on January 9, 2006, set February 6, 2006, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following described portion of Jericho Avenue NE, to wit: 1 ORDINANCE NO. (The West 5 feet of the East 10 feet of the South 286.45 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington) See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein is hereby vacated subject to a sidewalk, street lighting, and utility easement over, across, under and on all that part described above in favor of the City. This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining sidewalks, street lighting, utilities, and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto. The City may also construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is subject to the following terms and conditions: That a utility ea cement be retained over the above-described right-of-way, with the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated, with the City's approval, at the sole cost of the developer; and That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, and their heirs and successors in interest and assigns. SECTION IL No compensation is required for this street vacation. SECTION M. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. 2 ORDINANCE NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1244:2/10/06 3 • Jericho Ave NE Street Vacation Exhibit A N Tr NE 4th Street N Tr / / i 30' 30' / // / / / - / In • , W t0 ' Z co , N ' , 3 , , , ' a, , , 0 ' s , .V L In 0 75 150 1 :900 • Technical Services ♦ ® K. McFarla ' Planning/Building/Publicnd Works . Jan. 30, 2006