Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council 09/11/2006
AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL • ,,,►+ REGULAR MEETING September 11, 2006 Monday, 7 p.m. 1. CALL TQ ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: King County Records &Elections Accessible Voting Units 4. PUBLIC MEETING: Boundary Review Board decision re: Preserve Our Plateau Annexation 5 PUBLIC HEARING: - . - . • •. _ :. ' :• . ' . •. . ►; _ • • : (CANCELLED) 6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 7. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 8. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further_ discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 8/21/2006. Council concur. b. Mayor Keolker appoints the following individuals to the Parks Commission: Al Dieckman, 1837 NE 29th Ct., Renton, 98056, for a four-year term expiring 6/1/2010, and Larry Reymann, 1313 N. 38th St., Renton, 98056, for a four-year term expiring on 6/1/2008. Refer to Community Services Committee. c. Mayor Keolker reappoints Cynthia Burns, 2007 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056, and Michael O'Donin,423 Pelly Ave. N., Renton, 98055, each to the Parks Commission for a four-year term expiring 10/1/2010. Council concur. d. Administrative, Judicial and Legal Services Department recommends approval of a resolution transmitting the fireworks initiative ballot title to King County and requesting a special election on 11/7/2006. Council concur. (See 11.b. for resolution.) e. City Clerk submits annual Washington State Department of Transportation certification of State Highway Routes within the limits of incorporated cities and towns as of 7/1/2006 (required by RCW 47.24.010). Information. f. City Clerk reports bid opening on 8/30/2006 for CAG-06-141, May Creek Bank Stabilization: Edmonds Ave. Outfall Replacement; ten bids; engineer's estimate $169,337.40; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, Fury Construction, LLC, in the amount of $139,060. Council concur. g. City Clerk reports bid opening on 9/6/2006 for CAG-06-159, Renton Ave. S./S. 3rd St. Storm System Outfall Relocation; two bids; engineer's estimate $23,516; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of$53,940. Council concur. h. Community Services Department requests approval of a 1% for Art project consisting of etched stainless curved panels for the new park currently under construction in the Heather Downs neighborhood, and approval of the expenditure of$10,000 from Fund 125. Refer to Community Services Committee. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) i. Community Services Department recommends approval of the trail construction in the estimated amount of$1,599,997 for the Springbrook Trail Missing Link as part of the Washington State Department of Transportation I-405 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank 1/40001 construction project. Refer to Committee of the Whole; refer to Community Services Committee for a briefing. j. Community Services Department recommends approval of an amendment to the Conservation Futures interlocal agreement with King County(CAG-90-029) for open space funding to accept $100,000 for the Edlund/Korum property acquisition(18 acres located on the northeast corner of Carr Rd. and 103rd Ave.). Approval is also sought to reallocate the grant funds to the Community Development Impact Mitigation Fund. Council concur. k. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional • right-of-way at Garden Ave. N. and N. 8th St. as part of the South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Project (CAG-06-068). Council concur. 1. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional right-of-way at Garden Ave. N. and N. 10th St. as part of the South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Project(CAG-06-068). Council concur. m. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of the Aspenwoods Final Plat; 46 single-family lots on 8.2 acres located at Hoquiam Ave. NE and NE 10th St. (FP-06- 025). Council concur. (See 11.c. for resolution.) n. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends approval of a 2006 Budget amendment reflecting incoming revenue from Boeing and Harvest Transwestern Lakeshore to cover expenses amounting to $37,690 for the contracts with Blumen Consulting Group. Council concur. (See 11. for ordinance.) o. Finance and Information Services Department requests approval of a resolution authorizing the donation of surplus computers and other dated technology equipment to The Bit Bank, a non- profit organization. Council concur. (See 11.d. for resolution.) p. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval of an interlocal agreement with Valley cities regarding the Department of Justice Cops More grant for technology, to retain a consultant and have the City of Auburn act as agent for the Valley cities. Council concur. (See 11.e. for resolution.) q. Technical Services Division requests final approval of the 15-year latecomer agreement submitted by Bret Holmes for sewer main extension along Graham Ave. NE, and requested authorization for staff to finalize the agreement per City Code. Council concur. r. Transportation Systems Division submits CAG-05-098, Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169) Improvements Phase 1; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$74,310.14, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$41,436.31 to Sanders General Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. 9. CORRESPONDENCE 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk(*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Lease with 5 Kwang Corporation for City Hall Deli; Temporary Hire for Public Records Processing Assistance 11. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Preserve Our Plateau Annexation election date (see 4.) b. Special election on 11/7/2006 for the initiative measure concerning fireworks (see 8.d.) c. Aspenwoods Final Plat(see 8.m.) d. Authorizing donation of surplus computer-related equipment (see 8.o.) e. Interlocal agreement with Valley cities re: technology grant (see 8.p.) (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) ' r'•v Ordinance for first reading: 2006 Budget amendment for revenue to cover expenses for Blumen Consulting contracts re: Boeing Plant(see 8.n.) Ordinances for second and final reading: a. 2006 Budget amendment re: 2005 undesignated hotel/motel funds for marketing campaign (1st reading 8/21/2006) b. Use of golf course reserve fund balance for water rights attorney fees (1st reading 8/21/2006) c. Abatement of dangerous buildings (1st reading 8/21/2006) 12. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 13. AUDIENCE COMMENT 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION(litigation) 15. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Chambers 6 p.m. 2007/2008 Human Services Funding Criteria& Process Briefing; Preserve Our Plateau Annexation Election Date • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES.&THURS.AT 11 AM&9 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9 AM&7 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT I PM&9 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting September 11,2006 Council Chambers Monday, 7 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN, Council President; TONI NELSON; DAN CLAWSON; COUNCILMEMBERS DENIS LAW; TERRI BRIERE; MARCIE PALMER. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN DON PERSSON. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER, Mayor;JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative ATTENDANCE Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; TERRY HIGASHIYAMA, Community Services Administrator; MARTY WINE,Assistant CAO; PREETI SHRIDHAR, Communications Director; CHIEF I. DAVID DANIELS, Fire Department; CHIEF KEVIN MILOSEVICH, Police Department. SPECIAL Mayor Keolker spoke in remembrance of 9/11/2001, and honored those who PRESENTATIONS lost their lives five years ago as the result of terrorist attacks. She dedicated the Added day to the innocent victims and offered consolation to the families and friends Worldwide Event: of those who lost their lives. Additionally, the Mayor honored the courage, Remembering 9/11/2001 bravery, and dedication of the firefighters,police, and many others who heroically risked and gave their lives to save others. She stated that the events of 9/11/2001 have increased appreciation for the core values on which this country and the community are based, and she stressed that principles such as a democratically elected government, freedom of the press and of religious choice, and equality of individuals were the real targets of the terrorists. Fire Chief I. David Daniels stated that for the nation, this day is about remembering the attacks of five years ago, the response of the aid workers, the passengers of the hijacked airliners, and the military personnel who serve in the Middle East. Police Chief Kevin Milosevich named several police officers who have been militarily deployed to the Middle East. He indicated that law enforcement in this region has received federal grants for terrorism prevention, and noted that the resulting training, skills, and equipment can be applied to all types of disasters. In honor of the heroes, victims, soldiers, and their families and loved ones, Council President Corman requested that a moment of silence be observed to remember the events of five years ago. King County: Accessible Robyn London and Meghann Seiler, interns with the King County Records, Voting Units Elections, and Licensing Division,exhibited the new accessible voting unit (AVU)machine that will be implemented at every polling place in King County for the upcoming election on September 19. The AVU provides accessibility for voters with visual impairments and physical disabilities. Using the AVU, Ms. London and Ms. Seiler demonstrated how to fill out a touch screen ballot and an audio ballot. In conclusion,Ms. London pointed out that those without disabilities may also use the machine. September 11,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 295 PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Preserve Our accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker opened the public meeting Plateau, SE 128th St to consider confirmation of the action of the Boundary Review Board(BRB)to support annexation of approximately 1,475 acres, known as the Preserve Our Plateau Annexation, subject to agreement by a majority vote of registered voters residing within the area. The subject area is located in the unincorporated area of King County generally bounded by 144th Ave. SE on the west, 184th Ave. SE on the east, SE 128th St. on the north, and SE 149th St. on the south. Senior Planner Don Erickson reviewed the history of the annexation, highlighting significant actions as follows: • December 29, 2005 - King County certified the sufficiency of the annexation petition, which represented more than ten percent of the registered voters in the area. • February 13, 2006 - Council accepted the petition and adopted a resolution calling for an election. • June 14 and 15, 2006- BRB held public hearings on the matter and made its decision on August 10,2006, supporting the annexation. Mr. Erickson reported that the annexation area is located within Renton's East Rentorr Plateau Potential Annexation Area(PAA), and contains approximately 1,630 single-family dwellings. He noted that two-thirds of the areais bordered by the Urban Growth Boundary. Mr. Erickson explained that if Council confirms the actions of the BRB, legislation must be adopted affirming the annexation and calling for a vote by special election. Additionally,the King County auditor must be notified of the City's election date preference. Mr. Erickson indicated staffs preference for a Spring 2007 election date, specifically 2/6/2007, due to the necessary preparatory work needed for an area of this size, and due to the 3/1/2007 deadline for implementing 2008 levy rates. Continuing, Mr. Erickson stated that in November 2004, the Comprehensive Plan was amended to change the land use designation for the area to Residential Low Density. He pointed out that future zoning would be determined through a public prezoning process. Mr. Erickson reported that public services are currently provided by Fire District#25 and#10, Water District#90,Renton sewer,and the Renton and Issaquah school districts. Mr. Erickson explained that in order to ensure the City's current level of service for the entire East Renton Plateau PAA, it anticipates hiring 22 additional employees. At that level of staffing, an annual fiscal deficit of$263,000 based upon the area's existing conditions(without additional development) is anticipated. He noted that major efficiencies exist by bringing in the area at one time that would not be realized with smaller,piecemeal annexations. Referring to the resolution adopted in February 2006, Mr. Erickson reminded Council of its decision not to place a proposition for future zoning or a proposition concerning the assumption of outstanding indebtedness on the ballot. In conclusion,he said the annexation proposal is consistent with City policies, countywide planning policies, BRB objectives, and is supported by the BRB's findings and decision. Mr. Erickson relayed the Administration's recommendation to adopt a resolution indicating 2/6/2007 as the preferred date for the election. Public comment was invited. September 11,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 296 Gwendolyn High, 13405 158th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, introduced herself as the president of CARE (Citizens'Alliance for a Responsible Evendell),and noted that the group is the petitioner for the annexation effort. She indicated her preference for a November 2006 election date. Additionally, Ms. High noted the King County Executive's proposed budget cuts that will affect levels of service in unincorporated areas. Shirley Day, 14412 167th Pl. SE, Renton, 98059, voiced her disappointment with the BRB public hearings regarding this matter. She indicated that the BRB did not review information turned in by citizens and did not allow additional comment. Garrett Huffman, South King County Manager of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties, 335 116th Ave. SE, Bellevue, 98004, stated his preference for an election date in November 2006, as Renton's sewer moratorium in the East Renton Plateau PAA has been in place for over a year now. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. Responding to Council President Corman's inquiry regarding the election date, Economic Development Administrator Alex Pietch stated that the BRB rendered its decision quite late in the process and it is now too late to set the election date for November 2006. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION INDICATING 2/6/2007 AS ITS PREFERRED DATE FOR AN ELECTION ON THE QUESTION OF WHETHER REGISTERED VOTERS IN THE PRESERVE OUR PLATEAU ANNEXATION AREA FAVOR OR DO NOT FAVOR ANNEXATION TO RENTON AT THIS TIME,AND DIRECT THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT THE RESOLUTION SPECIFYING RENTON'S PREFERRED ELECTION DATE TO THE KING COUNTY AUDITOR. CARRIED. (See page 300 for resolution.) Planning: East Renton Plateau Mayor Keolker stated that the public hearing on the prezoning classifications PAA Future Zoning for the East Renton Plateau PAA was cancelled. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included: * The Maplewood Golf Course driving range will be closed for perimeter netting replacement from September 18 to October 2. The golf course and restaurant will remain open during normal business hours. * The Regional Transportation Improvement District(RTID) and Sound Transit are hosting an open house on the subject of"East King: Roads and Transit" on September 13 at the Meydenbauer Center. Transportation: Road& Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator,reported on Transit Plan, RTID& Sound the letter being prepared for presentation by City representatives at the Transit aforementioned open house. He stated that RTID and Sound Transit are working together on a joint transportation improvements project list for King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties, which will be brought before voters in November 2007. He pointed out that the State legislature mandated that the transportation ballot be a mixture of transit and roadway projects. September 11,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 297 Mr. Zimmerman indicated that Sound Transit and RTID are hosting a series of open houses, and the Administration recommends that the City testify at the open houses to make Renton's priorities known to representatives of the RTID and Sound Transit boards. He explained that the letter indicates Renton's support for the I-405 corridor project from SR-169 to I-90. Continuing, Mr. Zimmerman said the letter also supports planned SR-167 improvements and recommends that RTID seek ways to include a better interchange connection between 1-405 and SR-167, which is one of most congested interchanges in the State. Additionally, the letter proposes a project for the$237 million "additional investments and contingency category" for the SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. bridge over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe and United Pacific Railroad tracks, connecting Renton to Tukwila. Council President Corman indicated his support for the letter and for the City to testify at the open house. He expressed his concerns regarding traffic flow and the SR-167 and 1-405 interchange. Additionally, Mr. Corman agreed to attend the open house with staff. AUDIENCE COMMENT Marilyn Harris, 2313 SE 8th Dr.,Renton, 98055, requested a twelve-month Citizen Comment: Harris- adjustment to her water bills, from approximately July 2005 to August 2006, Water Bill Adjustment which were high as a result of a leak in the water service line to her home. Explaining that due to the difficulty in finding the leak since the water meter was located over 200 feet away from her front property line,she paid to have a new water meter installed in front of her lot and to have a plumber replace the line from the house to the new meter. Ms. Harris indicated that a recently adopted ordinance only allows for a two-billing period water leak adjustment. Mayor Keolker advised that the Administration is aware of the situation and supports Council's review of the matter. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE REQUEST FOR A WATER BILL ADJUSTMENT TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Council President Corman noted the extenuating circumstances of this particular situation. Citizen Comment: Reeves- Lenard Reeves, 2313 SE 8th Dr.,Renton, 98055, stated that he submitted a Water Bill Adjustment letter concerning the above-mentioned water leak, and he relayed the problems and expenses incurred in dealing with the situation. Citizen Comment: DeMastus- Sandel DeMastus, Highlands Community Association Vice President, PO Box Behavior 2041, Renton, 98056,voiced her concern regarding the behavior of some members of this Administration toward some citizens. She reminded Council of Ordinance 5155 (specifically the section on the Advisory Commission on Diversity),which contains language about prejudice and discrimination. Citizen Comment: Petersen- Inez Petersen, PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, stated that she is the secretary of Highlands Community the Highlands Community Association(HCA), which is a 501(c)(3)non-profit Association organization with bylaws on file with the State. She indicated that she was elected according to the HCA bylaws, and has close ties to the Highlands neighborhood. Ms. Petersen affirmed that the HCA is involved in cleaning up the neighborhood and uses a one-on-one approach with property owners. She suggested that the City use the funds set aside for the Highlands area redevelopment effort to fix the alleys, streets, and sidewalks. Additionally, she noted the need for more police officers and higher salaries for them. September 11,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 298 MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL GRANT THE SPEAKER FIVE ADDITIONAL MINUTES. CARRIED. Ms. Petersen thanked Council for the additional time to speak. She asked that Council consider her comments, and emphasized that the HCA is working hard for the community. Citizen Comment: Devine- Matthew D. Devine, 527 S. 28th Pl., Renton, 98055, spoke as president of the Airport-Related Noise Victoria Park Homeowners Association. He noted that his neighborhood is in the noisy flight path of Renton Municipal Airport, which experienced an increase in aircraft traffic and different types of aircraft as a result of runway repairs at Boeing Airport during August. Mr. Devine pointed out that in addition to the aircraft noise, his neighborhood endures noise from SR-167 and illegal street racing in the Valley. Noting that twin engine jets emit a substantial amount of noise, he requested that Renton not make any changes to the airport that alters the mix of aircraft that currently uses the airport. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 8/21/2006. Council concur. 8/21/2006 Appointment: Parks Mayor Keolker appointed the following individuals to the Parks Commission: Commission Al Dieckman, 1837 NE 29th Ct., Renton, 98056, for a four-year term expiring 6/1/2010, and Larry Reymann, 1313 N. 38th St., Renton, 98056, for a four-year term expiring on 6/1/2008. Refer to Community Services Committee. Appointment: Parks Mayor Keolker reappointed Cynthia Burns, 2007 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056, Commission and Michael O'Donin,423 Pelly Ave. N., Renton, 98055, each to the Parks Commission for a four-year term expiring 10/1/2010. Council concur. Public Safety: Citizen Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended approval Initiative, Fireworks Ordinance of a resolution transmitting the fireworks initiative ballot title to King County and requesting a special election on 11/7/2006. Council concur. (See page 300 for resolution.) WSDOT: 2006 State Highway City Clerk submitted annual Washington State Department of Transportation Routes Certification certification of State Highway Routes within the limits of incorporated cities and towns as of 7/1/2006 (required by RCW 47.24.010). Information. CAG: 06-141,May Creek City Clerk reported bid opening on 8/30/2006 for CAG-06-141, May Creek Bank Stabilization Edmonds Bank Stabilization: Edmonds Ave. Outfall Replacement; ten bids; engineer's Ave Outfall Replacement, Fury estimate $169,337.40; and submitted staff recommendation to award the Construction contract to low bidder,Fury Construction, LLC, in the amount of$139,060. Council concur. CAG: 06-159, Renton Ave S/S City Clerk reported bid opening on 9/6/2006 for CAG-06-159, Renton Ave. 3rd St Storm System Outfall S./S. 3rd St. Storm System Outfall Relocation; two bids; engineer's estimate Relocation, Gary Merlino $23,516; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to low Const Co bidder,Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of$53,940. Council concur. Community Services: New Community Services Department requested approval of a 1% for Art project Park, 233 Union Ave NE, 1% consisting of etched stainless curved panels for the new park currently under for Art Project construction in the Heather Downs neighborhood(233 Union Ave. NE),and approval of the expenditure of$10,000 from Fund 125. Refer to Community Services Committee. September 11,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 299 Community Services: Trail Community Services Department recommended approval of the trail Construction, Springbrook construction in the estimated amount of$1,599,997 for the Springbrook Trail Creek Wetland& Habitat Missing Link as part of the Washington State Department of Transportation I- Mitigation Bank, WSDOT 405 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank construction project. Refer to Committee of the Whole; refer to Community Services Committee for a briefing. Community Services: Community Services Department recommended approval of an amendment to Edlund/Korum Property the conservation futures interlocal agreement with King County(CAG-90-029) Purchase, King County for open space funding to accept$100,000 for the Edlund/Korum property Funding acquisition(18 acres located on the northeast corner of Carr Rd. and 103rd Ave.). Approval was also sought to reallocate the grant funds to the Community Development Impact Mitigation Fund. Council concur. Development Services: South Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Lake WA Roadway dedication for additional right-of-way at Garden Ave. N. and N. 8th St. as part Improvements, ROW of the South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Project. Council Dedication, CAG-06-068 concur. Development Services: South Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Lake WA Roadway dedication for additional right-of-way at Garden Ave. N. and N. 10th St.as part Improvements, ROW of the South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Project. Council Dedication, CAG-06-068 concur. Plat: Aspenwoods, Hoquiam Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions,of the Ave NE, FP-06-025 Aspenwoods Final Plat;46 single-family lots on 8.2 acres located at Hoquiam Ave. NE and NE 10th St. Council concur. (See page 300 for resolution.) EDNSP: Revenue Reflection Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department for Blumen Consulting recommended approval of a 2006 Budget amendment reflecting revenue from Contracts, Budget Amend Boeing and Harvest Transwestern Lakeshore to cover expenses amounting to $37,690 for the contracts with Blumen Consulting Group. Council concur. (See page 300 for ordinance.) Finance: Donating Surplus Finance and Information Services Department requested approval of a Computer-Related Equipment resolution authorizing the donation of surplus computers and other dated technology equipment to The Bit Bank,a non-profit organization. Council concur. (See page 300 for resolution.) Finance: Public Safety Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval of an Technology Infrastructure interlocal agreement with Valley cities regarding the Department of Justice Interlocal Agreement Cops More Grant for technology,to retain a consultant and have the City of Auburn act as agent for the Valley cities. Council concur. (See page 300 for resolution.) Latecomer Agreement: Technical Services Division requested final approval of the 15-year latecomer Holmes, Sewer Extension agreement submitted by Bret Holmes for sewer main extension along Graham (Graham Ave NE), LA-06-001 Ave. NE,and requested authorization for staff to finalize the agreement per City Code. Council concur. CAG: 05-098,Maple Valley Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-05-098, Maple Valley Hwy. Hwy Improvements Phase 1, (SR-169) Improvements Phase 1;and requested approval of the project, Sanders General Construction authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$74,310.14, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $41,436.31 to Sanders General Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. September 11,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 300 MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Finance Committee Vice Chair Law presented a report recommending approval Finance Committee of Claim Vouchers 251424 -252225 and five wire transfers totaling Finance: Vouchers $7,864,309.52; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 65188 - 65842, two wire transfers, and 1301 direct deposits totaling$4,312,179.06. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution #3829 A resolution was read calling for the annexation, by election, of approximately Annexation: Preserve Our 1,475 acres of contiguous unincorporated territory within Renton's East Renton Plateau, SE 128th St Plateau Potential Annexation Area; stating the number of registered voters residing therein as nearly as may be; calling for an election to submit the proposal for annexation to voters of the territory; and authorizing the City Clerk to file with the King County auditor a certified copy of this resolution setting forth the City's preferred date(2/6/2007) for a special election. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3830 A resolution was read requesting that King County Division of Records and Public Safety: Citizen Elections call a special municipal election,to coincide with the general election Initiative,Fireworks Ordinance to be held on 11/7/2006, and place Proposition No. 1 (initiative measure concerning fireworks)before the qualified electors of the City of Renton on the 11/7/2006 ballot. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3831 A resolution was read approving the Aspenwoods Final Plat; approximately 8.2 Plat: Aspenwoods, Hoquiam acres located in the vicinity of Hoquiam Ave. NE, south of NE 10th St. Ave NE, FP-06-025 MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3832 A resolution was read authorizing the donation of surplus computer-related Finance: Donating Surplus equipment and printers. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY Computer-Related Equipment NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3833 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Finance: Public Safety interlocal agreement among the cities of Algona, Auburn, Fife, Kent, Pacific, Technology Infrastructure Puyallup, Renton, Sumner, and Tukwila(Valley cities), authorizing retaining Interlocal Agreement CBG Communications Inc. as the consultant and agrees that the City of Auburn will serve as the agent for the Valley cities in project support of the Department of Justice Cops More Grant for technology. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 9/18/2006 for second and final reading: EDNSP: Revenue Reflection An ordinance was read amending the 2006 Budget by reflecting revenue in the for Blumen Consulting amount of$4,610 from The Boeing Company and $33,080 from Harvest Contracts,Budget Amend Transwestern Lakeshore to cover expenses amounting to $37,690 for contracts with Blumen Consulting Group for Boeing Plant sub-district 1A and 1B consistency analysis work and subsequent appeal. MOVED BY September 11,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 301 CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 9/18/2006. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#5219 An ordinance was read amending the 2006 Budget by transferring funds in the EDNSP: Hotel/Motel Fund amount of$60,000 from the 2005 undesignated hotel/motel fund,with$50,000 Use for Marketing Campaign, going to Pravda for the purpose of creating a Renton marketing video under the Budget Amend Renton Community Marketing Campaign,and$10,000 to cover contracts with Hamilton/Saunderson and the Chamber of Commerce. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5220 An ordinance was read amending the 2006 Budget to authorize$20,000 from Community Services: the golf course fund balance to appropriate for water rights attorney fees. Maplewood Golf Course MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT Reserve Fund Use, Water THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Rights Attorney Fees, Budget Amend Ordinance#5221 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 3 of Title I (Administrative) and Development Services: Chapters 5 and 9 of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code by Nuisance Ordinance, Burned- updating the definitions of unfit, or abandoned structures, and adopting by Out Buildings reference the 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Briere announced that the Renton High School Excellence in Community Services: Education Foundation benefit golf tournament scheduled for 9/15/2006 at Maplewood Golf Course, Maplewood Golf Course is still in need of golfers. Benefit Golf Tournament AUDIENCE COMMENT Howard McOmber, PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, indicated that he is looking Citizen Comment: McOmber- forward to working together with the City to improve the Highlands area. He Highlands Area pointed out the need for improvements to the alleys and sidewalks,and the need Redevelopment to be creative in finding solutions. Citizen Comment: Petersen- Inez Petersen,PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, stated her desire for the Various incorporation of Fairwood. Additionally, she expressed her desire that the Blueberry Farm in the Kennydale area be preserved as a critical area. Ms. Petersen noted that the Highlands Community Association filed a SEPA appeal regarding the Highlands Subarea rezoning proposal, and questioned how the Planning Commission can proceed with the Comprehensive Plan amendments while the appeal is still pending. Citizen Comment: Puckett- Jerry Puckett, 15260 Oak Dr., Renton, 98058, stated that he lives at the Wonderland Estates Mobile Wonderland Estates Mobile Home Park on Maple Valley Hwy. He questioned Home Park, 2006 Comp Plan why the Comprehensive Plan amendment concerning the property was not Amendment discussed at the last Planning Commission meeting even though it was listed on the agenda. Mayor Keolker said the matter will be investigated. Citizen Comment: Snyder- Russell Snyder, 18228 124th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058, stated that there is a Renton Growth great change coming to the spiritual climate in Renton to extend the City's vision to its citizens. He predicted that the people of the community will unite and begin to take responsibility in ways not done so before,which will result in peace and goodness that permeates the City. September 11,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 302 EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 15 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:36 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann September 11, 2006 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 11, 2006 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COUNCIL WORKSHOP WED., 9/27 Annexations; 11 a.m. Budget Priorities *7th Floor Conferencing Center* COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 9/18 Emerging Issues: Budget Priorities, (Corman) 5:30 p.m. Transportation Issues, Annexation- Related Issues, and Parks Maintenance Facility Update *Council Conference Room* Approximately Puget Sound Regional Council Briefing 6:30 p.m. on Burlington Santa Fe Rail Line Acquisition *Council Chambers* COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 9/18 2007/2008 Community Development (Nelson) 4:30 p.m. Block Grant Funding Allocations; Advisory Commission on Diversity Citizenship Condition Waiver Request; Springbrook Trail Missing Link FINANCE (Persson) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 9/18 Dance Hall Ordinance (Law) 4 p.m. TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Palmer) UTILITIES (Clawson) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. `SY O C.)( �Nr-rO� PRESERVE OUR PLATEAU ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION SETTING ELECTION DATE September 11, 2006 The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from registered voters in the proposed annexation area representing more than 10% of the area's estimated 3,200 registered voters. King County Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division certified the sufficiency of this petition on December 29, 2005. The City adopted a resolution in February 2006 accepting the proposed annexation and calling for an election. The Council decided not to place the proposition of whether voters would be asked to assume their proportionate share of the City's outstanding indebtedness on the ballot since the amount is so small and these bonds are near retirement. The Council also decided not to put the issue of future zoning on the ballot, preferring to hold public hearings on this issue so that residents can be heard. As a result, the ballot will only ask voters whether they wished to be Skov annexed to the City of Renton or not. The special election is anticipated to be held in the spring of 2007 with Council setting the actual election date this evening. Under state law, the City will incur the costs of this special election. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.040 the petition calling for an election was forward to the Boundary Review Board for King County. The City invoked the jurisdiction of the Board in order that it would hold public hearings on the annexation. These hearings were held on June 14 and June 15, 2006. On August 10, 2006 the Board issued its Findings and Decision that stated: "The Boundary Review Board finds that approval of the City of Renton Notice of Intention to annex the Preserve Our Plateau Area is timely based upon the City of Renton's current and historical commitment to guide development and provide municipal services to this area. Annexation will enable the City of Renton to provide a harmonious efficient plan for the governance of the built community, preserving the environment, and protection of public health and welfare." In considering this petition driven annexation the City has decided that residents would receive the same level of service it provides other City residents. Consultant studies indicate that the City would also need to hire additional personnel to do this. These studies. anticipate approximately 21 new employees, including police, fire, and public works, to provide the 1,475- acre area the same level of service it provides residents elsewhere in the City. Even with this higher level of service, most property owners within the annexation area would pay the same or less for property taxes and services than they now do as residents of unincorporated King County. Pursuant to state law (RCW 35A.14.050) the City is required to hold tonight's public hearing and indicate its preference for a special election, which is then forwarded to the County Auditor. ',•'4':!'"'""-:::',1''''''' '''''^. , kSys d:: ,;'; ,,p*k ` t"F, i, i'qi. ., s! yea c#,,,4,..,..;,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,...,,,,,,,•., .. .. ,. ., , • Ihh4 i 11. Cl�l�allO�u Cn 1 - =�..�- // ���.R -�autLW • :a-c,�ra .= 11111111'. iii C:;- , ET, 1111111111111 "Ill= _�■q.I iNo_ �, n■■ 1111 i a jii14:131Igiikvl h��•rY_�_� :: ti..�c-r IH rn-nr iog 4 _ ■1:.:f.�p ■■ ` �Li liu.: !�Ntc-�i 111= cad■ . ■!jl -.tw!■1 L,LIN 2' \ �,��,,I - QI•: .els . 1 a Te g-il V:n--Ir - Illerep--1 - -��1 ��� �Ilt: `�.�. •'} Y�■i11�-� n a�ir�t j�°-� II �� �i —�_ ���II/�.! 3111;;.1111 Ifi�i ;`� A� A� ��1��; .Jt 7■;1 -� - ■-i■� :: �^* ! II. s `, • as111111"IIID:102!OL -pol ..._____ALL.,4 �,!II ill gimilA P.11-.111.1 1111. .Immo my --ii � ium.1 , ■ :1 - ail . ■ �- �� LIIIIIIIrill:11111Ciril:1/71:r*.if: �� . ��urs a co 2 Glib s naln pm�. ,l olm■;■ , �I aiirr II 'iiiiiir coi ��=:il:� ��. . �J�ill unoun i$.,i� ��I�.■�:I X111 IUI ,� ��� IEL1 ��D. �i._dIIt •� ' I E�::1♦�u1c•`� �� �� '1: a■nIn:�a•► .~.IY ■ r 1- ml ■moi -��..a.. i1�lE�li !�e��� ■ri \,����`, --1/_ i:1111111111111.��y ■■■�■t _� ►.1111 _img um„, - y 1:_.■r1 utz ��'"�, '. n POMO 111\ ` � :�lnnoull �� .$E 132nd St —� ��� �I�w� i - MO _ ::I ♦��� _t� �nq�. _ice I!IIIIL IIIIIR] Wiz `�i7 ? mom EN IIIMI111.1%Ell=MB MO 1: �•i ► /0.. ►.! - ` sE 134th ■� ■.Y. ■■ J'1�7�7111111_�1 _ .,_.�. �1��131 c3161I!lGSI ��i41�m�= ��1�■!1!111-'- ` ■. ""Oil 34th StIII MB ���■ �1�► IIIIIIIUi/-4nam1.a—__ ��■�+I11J751��.,�, ism -- '��Il�uii�1 In”MP ' ■ pow-���__ ==a, 10I � ,a! eMII l•1�� L+ IIII.1—� 113 �—�_ imain. .1IiY {� 1��111'...!' 1= 11.11 mi III ■!11■ `--�=���=a=- ���■ VJ _�� ,11111 ���! �r ■IO ■�■ ■ ft n/1 117!'ai]IJIO loon°% 11��1=masa'-1- �� �� � �/1� Io. :1\•��1I1��111//1 �rt� ELIl11'�7yt'eon ��r '�� �i�E 111�ta.ii -�_,., -�4Er 6 / kini11 immil-lip; �3IE�di)1. ■ a , 1„�� --►r:.' ■ : ►- - t . rr��i.I .m-/■r7._....�:,,-►1�--'t•�►11'I -111111■ �_ _all .M � 1,.16' %v."•I!•1 LIE:'Imo.n/.■I.■. IN ME rr� --mall ■�� LI � ♦ .,-�.�Y-ism r�•— _� 11.1 ■p sE 140 �'!�_�� lJl311i:3_�!; QIP*��.c War. -■1.--�\U ��. ��1� 1111 11�� �� E'X1111111 - .m I ar. .0, -I... l ■� i 1■ ,fi///� ,1 `. �' T.� �-i iA i1,�-Ir.—! iw'.II ,�� r ii — t _��� �-----mg-v.-� ■� l Vii�ti ����� Y. Yr ���WM NM- C.---=a i u i �;�_. 1t+ - = Fa"'1�""""' iii�_■■■1 ism�I � - 1I/ Vim' _■'_�/• ! �= ��:.1 a i.a .� -_i 7I .."� 1E��Z�l�E� ..mho _.—�11..1—� _ ��.I11- S 1--�1►\■.�I! 11!\llEarl 144th i■rili�1�1�\:1°*� 1/'49 s:hil■ m MI'11"" + �o �i` >�/',.,:Y�i �� $I all IN-;---N 1111 111111■ ,� /M+■Ir -_M _ �npum t�1 16 �- :� �' NOUN .: l�111 in..... ■ ►��e ■■■ IY■ ■ ■ .1 �■ i1E3 ► •IN . �. . a, a- Jnr _1111 1 ■.11111r C X11 4ttilk1►��iii 4 _ 1111111•r ���ildk* *Ilatstion1 � � �� �IIt1r\ 171b� ■�igilli..�i - i►�•1IN1 41 1/ 41111/8511,"1111 ±-,� FioKCaTf!J/i is��min Nom j Iw: �I aka ur T=II all = :C�PW� ♦ A �IAI�I111u11ll11 /� r �� 411 IIIIIIrgllri �41 ,el ,iii it NI• leu: �' IlifettirrilLniciiatryfilivalliP;Iym; /1r�• fi�gailILr �pP Milt I PJe volley H ' 1 ,����,.• •i Itsrm, 4 -%.., •" IIIA 0,•• $4 11, :4101P 1111111 pia 6016,17sAii;gli f411111 . mos a..1gri,ifiipplitt 1p.... .....,,,„.....„,,,," ,. ,,i, -,...._. SE Renton , SI; 1 ,'Aell5'3 .°. .11 iff ..,01141\ 41;,,__r" 1111111111111111111Issa.- 44‘ctArfir;1-1-4111411.litalliffiriff 411111116111 alai Ill .,_. Proposed Preserve Our Plateau Annexation Annexation Area 1 �'t Economic Development.Neighborhood:&Strategic Planning ' Alex Piet — — Renton City Limits 90 6 Del Routh dmini.tnta � Z3Januaryzooa - • - Urban Growth Boundary RECEIVEd SEP 11 2006 C.) -1( O� ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, ATON CITY COUNCd�. ♦ , LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members, Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayof� FROM: .jYiaiarty Wine, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, Planning Manager, EDNSP SUBJECT: Preserve Our Plateau Annexation ISSUE: Should the City Council request that King County call a special municipal election to consider the annexation of Preserve our Plateau Annexation area in 2007? If yes, Council has 30 days from the time of BRB decision transmittal to request an election date from King County. The City received the BRB decision on August 14. When should the election be held in 2007?Choices include February, March, April, May, September, or November, 2007. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council approve a resolution calling for King County to hold a special municipal election for placement on February 6, 2007 election ballot. The rationale for this recommendation is as follows: • Although residents right now prefer to remain unincorporated, there are issues within Renton's control, including zoning, and information about taxes and services, that could potentially change opinion with adequate information. • Renton would experience financial benefits by having an election in February if the effective date of the election is March 1, 2007. The timing of annexation is particularly important to leverage property tax receipts, and in this case, represents the first step in a series of interlocal agreements with King County to make Annexation Initiative funding available if the area annexes. o If a March 1, 2007 effective date is possible, then the City can collect revenue (property taxes, state-shared revenues) in the area in 2007. Council President Randy Corman Page 2 of 2 September 11,2006 o King County has offered Annexation Initiative funding through a draft interlocal agreement to assist with offsetting the costs of transition and planning. • If the election fails, it is likely that annexations will proceed through the 60% petition process. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The BRB held a public hearing about the Preserve our Plateau Annexation(POPA) on June 14, 2006, and supported the annexation without modifications on August 10, 2006. State law requires that the City of Renton act on BRB's decision within 30 days of receipt of the BRB's decision,which was August 14. Tonight's meeting is the next regular meeting following the BRB decision,The City must now indicate to the county auditor its preference for a special election date for submitting the proposal to the voters. The county legislative authority must set the election date on the date indicated by the city. In 2005 and 2006, the City has conducted outreach meetings jointly with King County, and a survey which showed that given the choice, most residents in the area would prefer to remain unincorporated, and many hold that opinion strongly or very strongly. The single most important issue in potentially changing minds is development density and quality in the area. Other concerns include public safety,tax burden, preservation of open space, and extension of sewer in the area. Council will reconsider the sewer moratorium prior to the election date. The existing sewer moratorium is scheduled to expire in December 2006 after its past extension for six months in July 2006. Without a sewer moratorium, development occurring in the interim would develop to the County standards. Council has the option to extend the moratorium through March 2007 or allow the moratorium to expire and continue to issue permits based on Renton's Comprehensive Plan RLD land use designation. Pre-zoning issues are anticipated to be handled with an East Renton Advisory Task Force and Renton Planning Commission to be convened this month and their work through January on community planning issues, and beyond on service issues that are important to the community. A minimum of two public hearings on zoning will need to be held in the future. The Administration also plans to provide neutral, factual information about the implications of annexation on Renton and respond to questions about public services it could provide in the area. CONCLUSION: The purpose of this resolution is to request a February 6, 2007 election date of King County. We cannot predict how voters in the area will vote, but the election date is timed to give us through January, 2007 to address important issues such as pre-zoning and public outreach, and potentially tie together the sewer moratorium and interlocal agreement with King County to address residential development concerns on the Plateau. I s.,, .)0,,..oi;',,,,:::. — .,,,t.:!: ..„::.:,!: !kit,,,.....:1; "#;;-,P,,,, ..::::,-..:',..•,:4..:. ;,':'7.;;;;,,,,'‘ ., 44111E2it ,:,,,..,,1‘.:::,..iii,.,-..:,,,;.".1,;;14.4,. .7:004., ` ` . ' . - -----!"-, '•.''; .,z--'6,- .. •., ' ..., Decision LL7. ',.,:‘,... ..,-&lig to•v,tr, , ',, Ayr,. crs and .,,-.,,,,,,, . „....04 Board j..-.....-.4,rit. . " •-•—•7'‘•i.,,ri'.;4- 'ithe Fm . w Review 0 ,,0 ary • --;=-11,-,,,,, ,0,•,.., ,.Y 0 .si — . 'on to set ,'..:‘, s•..?+,,•,,,.• ,A.. . ;.0., plot decision of ko..,•,.,-4,4*.tv• * ' !:r;:' ts B.,..,question .„,•:*,, -p., •,,,,,T-•441.2fr.._- ,, z,;,,,,,,,--„. . ,aocc ' e ,,,.osg.gow on th date 111.0.11 4 < .'.4,,,:z.t'.,..,„'. .' .. 'e-,4«. ,' ,t,4•*'T- , 0 07— , 4%....+4,*:;„,,- , ''.4';',%rt:'' *,(4t., ' ".1. ,':";°"f *::•••,.e' '',4.., •,,..- '''''""t,,t., ,r, '• 4Iz*.=tl,..:-,''„; .,..1...h, , •-4,',.`., i,,,,, ;,,,v64,, •**- '. ,'...,. . ..41.14, 4.,f A, ke,;.,.k., '' ', .,•,- '"•'. ',....4,M44.' of Notice , " .,Ion iitt•%:', ' ''... -.,,,..,, leo ti4Ity,f,,, , 1070election received • n by reoe annexation' County for an * ' ''*g.,,.,' *. -- - '•' ' • -r-• ,, , certified 1Cc)aunt least area was tion representingtion ph— etS ,16 p-- -tur- exa ,,,.:-.0 vy,,,,,,4 signA in annexation..., , ters -.• .`..,:--0.,rhi,0 • ..1 . oving-d ..t. , , that the • t 0 -- -: tl,.•.,... - , glii ..r.:(7-1a.,0 :,-.4 ell requestedhearing ..," ,,..#4:!.'• .:-.- ton public tion arm 3V. vw d hu-RA proposed: nApit6ells•cilar 1‘LAaannexation 9!,/ the t,..,,"`)it 4,1'0'1.1' .,1... . (04, , ..--",•*4" ut9,1;! 14,13,0_111P s,', vt,,,,,I....!16,,,,17-4: ..,• 6 ,.4,-, t.Alok.t**1 P i, ,,.., .., 2 kot...,I,..,,-,.....41‘41,..'.,' •:..„..,,, ,"- -,,,,i,- 011ie-4Z•> : *' ' •1.4:7-;:.!:*''''. ' ,,, • r344,..i.,*'•,..•**'4:4 re, r ��„a ; g�< ;.... g� ae.. : 40 : ., continued Zt:4*''''.".:;:'!4•'4 .7171'''''''' '.: •''''kr''''' '. / " 2Q &Council ado ted a resolution w is " �, pt.: 1,.#�/o Notice of Intent petition, and 0z :0',V;L.-"Of,i,.,,7„,,,,..4.4„,;ion44k14%.•''•':7'ejection, AlktopA ` Q�ttWot put issue of future zoning on the b, • go through pre-zoning + � � taut issue of assumption of City's i. 0 1W.,,§;:,s an ballot since amount is k.'4.3411itft.1„i,:.:„.:,..:140',,.;:,:.;4,,,:„;,; ::.-',, ,',• anexpected to be retired in 2009 fr#PI..4ftt'tfflfc2:.Aia;.-,;i:.;:?:g.,, ,,',.,,.....:..,..:::. , Ci#y of Ran#On ki , , Merritt 11(Phase ii) Current Annexations Perkins., n. .,.W, . T.. Aster Park Y 18 5 ac. Querin [c € ,. g tioquiain. s € ,' " p' „ k' t. 2Q,4ac, . W.a .. Preserve T,-;, ii , Dur Plateau € K w • `, Leitch`_„, z -M 16.2 aG, 1 h Maplewood , :..,„,d,, ! £ = A ition : ary Y• § ,.na . .'. . E`*\ 6 � a Akers Farms + �, ._.._.,�...__ jHudso� 13.9 ac. 3' Falk 11, i ; ; ,.u .6,8 aG.• . I ' 25,7aCe' : , r 25,7 aC. 1 r 3 t . Aff ify . L.:;14,:viti. mut axA,,,‘A.1Aitv,43.#4<v<-,t''g. iiiiit W • i •„:;': dl:',':" " • 1-4,4:,4k.."N N,', '',''''''4,'"4 [ x 1w+s3' , , • , i Dm '44. 41FIWI(ii.-31011% � I8 1281 C gs a,k { ale 3 11111i1.1111 • r s�f „ ; ), E-x m sSt o 'S • f CO cr g .' ,,,,�+!, „ . e '4'.,Annexation Area " ACOR.x F §MPJ,,it v';' ' r,.. v` r.S I f. t v . V f r a g4OR ... " R" R' COR ": ::'• :" m ,�� \ S. s ..w ..y Proposed Preserve Our Plateau Annexation 17.no ,JIA, 8.ii-,-, ..,., d' e.i.a v AnnaA�on A2. - a " i' Haman cery trruu mt�:aa,l• Ottawa Gooll:Board,ly 4 „. . ,:.,•--'...;',,,,,!...,..,..',',',, DOPA .,--,--i7-1.:.:Z:. ',Me.,''''',',... ,,.......„.„•....,,,,,,,, .4.4 rinS I "t.I'5'1!.''1-.:.",.'"ilif'!!'''''''''''''5'''''''' '• ' I L'il'j 4 .'.41:it,::54.4.2'''..:.5..,,,,'i,i.:4 ,'',,,,,'.'",;„5','..'.•,Co1:1(I. :S..,077,1...f!k';`‘','5...„4.;,:iir,'"?,t1:444•kp,.","/;"5:•:,,,:,:,,'.i.55,,Jo.*„,15iv,,e-5, .: '• .,.,....,..:,,,...,,, gt145:1'.''” and : ,.. ,DAA Ave SE ton s PAA 6th . teau east of 15East Pia SE ,....„:!:,.:,...:.:,..,,:-...,,,,,,,,,,..,-..,,:f..,,....„.,.*:„.:,:::;,,,,,,...„...7,:ii,,,,.:.......,,,,,,,,...,:,;;-..:•:.;:thm-- .R.e,...,;:.... a n, ' Ave ';';',.:'..,--..0'.,•::::, ...:!.;',`.:°;'„',1...%.,gii;41.45..! -Iii.k4i..:,...r.e,,,,14,,..,are. R.ento ,-56t Aorai Y * of I 011• ' e,t within west - 87 properties 1. ..,-,.''N''' :' '''' ..;.:Afiklo'siN'''''.'''''''''' U.#:,.!. ',....Altifew . tv,...x7,4-,*,'.4f,...,,,„.:„.,4,,-,,!:,q;,..;....,. dwellings res - ,t, A C17.7.:5 . i:.i,':..i'.44.1..,?,7'.'7.'.7..''' . ' • Urban ,..:..,,f::, ;,* ,..„,,,,,,-,?-.'......- ,,A single-family the is...,..i,.,:::,ii;t:.1.:',...;z•-:',-....'t.' ..zit,.;',.-''.::-:',:;,,,,,i,„.„ r-6,0v- by .. -17 ,=, ,,,, • . bordered ,,4:.;:',,,,t,'ji',414',..4::.'4::''''':':'"'• . :- ' site is ''''''''.,;,',.::',''.1;'.`.!i:P:. 1 .'.t..4,17,7',:':`.......1.',.''' s .of /3 ,s, :::,,..,'"...:;..,.....,,,:.....,..4.-....,...,gfp.,,,... ...-. . -!.....i.....4dat!)r,--':',..!:3.• ..:*., ,.... ' ,...;.......-.... . 4 , ,4!..4 ' . .. „,:. • .'..,...... N.1.7,....,:zP,-.7.,Ii..:,,, ......,,,:t..:„..:_;i:ii,i,,t,t1-. .,.,.....i:i..... ,,..,,i,, .•1,..vp,./.:1-,,i2,7- '.'11.=.'t71:' k41.411.4 '4'''' ...li• .*.'4';,.:1...' .'::ric.....,...,:-,... .;--... :«''',.;:ii,%1; 1 ' i:11:'.1;4•,#:744*-',"--:. .....`A l'..'",.",..i. ,.• .t, ..r...: z.,14''''....' ',' ".'",ilk, i i,-,.,-. . . .....1,:.,-,..e..-...,.' .,....4„...,...,,,,,,,,,...,.. ,,.....,.:., ...:, .-,.%,., ......,„.„ „,,,-...,,,............„,..„..,...„.,..... .,,.:..,.,.4,.....-„:„...:-.[!#.: .....:- • ...-A, . ..7;',-.;..ii,.........„,,,,:.:4„.. ...,,-.....,:. ..-:::...,..--,-,.t ,..-„,-: .,..,,,..-.1:. ,•-.......,;::.. •,,,...2. , ... . , ..,. .,.. ... ..., .„ ..,. f.'IS' ,'!".1.,...-' ,.r, kv: *.k....' •' ',,;;;i1,..:•':' ..,:',••:,',''''. :;-,r : - '... ..c....:-....).;',,..'0' .. . ,.,..."'...".;'..'".*::',7,. -..,.,•,'..1,''., .t.'".. .,-...',,l',',-:. '.. ,,,e.'.....,.:; ,.:,-. . .....,.;,:•.;;;;.....:.-.,;..;,:. , ;: ..; 7...i.1,"*.t.,%.\'........,4:-„Nvif..1',7.;k:,4‘4,...i.,..**•, .0..- •..:.40...- ...... ....A.'.'. ,.,...:: :,t=.:.1............;:.;: ..:;4,--..,„,.....;„,.' „",..,•,,..,...„,:.,.i.,,,:if.:,:f.......,-,i,.,,..,„. .:$„.,,... . .. , ..,.... ....s.,...:v.,,,..... ,..., ...v,..,.-. ..i.=.:.4..:A...•...,,,. ......s.' - A—CMU 5 ........-„„,„,.. h . - -_ u,nnn . ,...„....., .. „.. Annexation Plateau .,,. Our ' ..,,,,4-7::::;':.•''. Preserve d Pre ,... Proposed .....,.. Ag It titittion_ — Vicinity f:,,,..,poz kt'-*.-4.iti , w.t)' -4„,.., • "'Lla: ,; R V '''. 1 ' ,.• ,,,..: , - . ,J ,, ,4,'` ., 't -...1 41 •? ' :4411116t . .- • -,,...,;.. ,,,e,,,4,,,,,, "''', ;.... , klt. ;,*..'- ;...- ','1.04..' T.,,*,,-:. - .. , 'NI }. •11.fitiEl'''. '.ti0',..111 I,„ '*1 '. * II .''....::-..:' * - ,,,:''‘, .. ,..,,,t,,,,, .,04,,,,, ,,,,, ',,,/... ':'7.," • .,.,` -,-",„..i, '..:'...., ..„-,.. -, -4, .., 4, :1.*:: '' -"':‘,0%,'; '-'.*:' ilit!ii '.' t;'r. I k '• . ,:;, kit.V'.-',,-4,44:'::,;II ',',,g.:* it 00 ,"P', Li ' ': .."'444 'I -". `,--1- ' • -... ....„..---'' • : ..:. ' - I ,1 ..._,,... ...._ .:.„.,,,,.: . ,„:„...,. ,. ., , , .:,,,...., .. ......., ., ,...„.„...,......,.....,„.„,..... .. ,,il.i.almt*i 216 i ' ) s I 7 ,....- , Rt , 44 ' 6....:.V Existing Dwellings = 1,639 : ......, ,_ ., . ,. „....:,..- . k ... .. I 4 1 • ; : . ,: ;;c:Pe, i 7::'' 4. . & , .., , ,, Proposed Preserve ,,-- e Our Plateau Annexation A . 6 ,„s;o:1:1:7 : ... ut o4- N . sr , cess a thatCouncil. notify County - 3 1 ls"�, s (erred election within 30 y Y` �f3�'s findings and decision a � � .-,', ;; : e ec on:ate•seems most preferable .a _ cessary preparatory work " P �� �' ��,�Cnttcal date in terms of i *lian : ev 'rates for the area that the City +,. . s eQ1le in, in 2008 . . g O0' is also a critical date in terms of ax,j, .� k .ty..s'$1.75 M East Renton M . �,�ve offer '. 111 := . rocess, contin. 4 ss'�i prang 2007.Election Dates s,. ,.:�m /�(('�' C FF 5=�$_ ` y te `ebruary 6, 2007 miss March lSt J 0 • . nett lementmg 2008 levy rates and ';-i$tat,ea red revenues st OQ�revenue in excess of$2.4 M . r Yz �� W 7 r" £ . mcnprehensive Plan esiaion — 2004, F a iiiioti: NI � 3a°sy�yq 3` Prt v. ' t41%-, „:. .mow: 1 j Sof �� _ s .�.. d L � 1 t ^ R ! c a-4,,,,„i---14.31,..... .-+ ......:.,elf .",,. r a1,,a grated most of East Renton Plateau dent a�a ens�ty'(RI D i' -: •% .w, Q r, ensive Plan , ` del aio - 2004 3 � » O 4 bV mon amended its Comp Plan �g x. the land use designation for �: du/net ac), to RLD (max. 4 4A., rititpf. 4 . n X6 developable scares nearly halved ktiii;,...,t,,,,,i,......, -:,.c "`: A ';' � � • r,nfv trips potentially generated also halved +` ".determined through public «�` " +utrr �publc hearings to be held s;" w ,.47.44 4- • 8 - . ,-, 7*/ '.•;.:,..!it':;,,ffii,..=. ` k'' . — . . 1,17 f 1,... .... -........ t. ....,.. ..„.,,,,... .. , , . ...,...-.....„,,,,, .„,..... .., ,. -,.. .,,,,4f.,-- - .4....... .;- ,,. . .: .. :..:. .,.... ..-- .. . .. .,-.:.,".! ';'.:';,., -.. ' --0 t.,.... 41, S'. ,.,� w,». d*.:i..,.. .. - . ..', g ' , ,:: :lir ..,1... ' :,..' 4 :,....:it . ...,!,' �,:. ,. r .41 „..-. ...„=. , _ ., , .. , . „.............„.......,,....,.,....„...;::...„ .. ...„.......,:,,,t„.,.,„,,,.. :,7__ .,,,, , "7 i ^' �' a f at ' x h ...,,., .,• ,....„„,,,„....„....„.....,,„....,,,; . .. .,.,, . : ...:. , „.. ., .'„. ....„.+,...,,,..„...„..„....,:v..,''..., 1.'2.7.'.''''''''..4:''. .' .•.:••••• ''''''''It..` ' .-;.'4'''';;'.:*'•'10'. **!'....:' • • •• ':' '''''''49.':5:.;.'",-..:-!... e.''''' '''.'4';''''''''; ';': T' .F 4 Y`a r " ?� � �s£ m �� iii `"k. 11' 'on° bans - Public Services-. , Y R.; o "fin Fire'Distr ct 25 gid. , r� Fire District 10 t;:"i.,,..:......,._.... it,;:,,,.!',..,,,,i;..,,ii,...,,fp;iilet*...„,,,t,:,,,..I.A.‘„-H,oryi_. ...a car District :,_ „,,,,..„, :.,7,7.....,,(,,,.„,..,y,....„. ...,. ...4„:„.4„....,,,,,,,,...„,-.. ..44c.:2..•• ;.;;':: ' , „i..'. 111 ewer ; ;..t.,..4'..Z.. .t. =.0;,:.........W4'.t..,..,::,..t.t.A.,..,.:,,,,„,. ,-;;.,-,'",„'' '.- . Ai& 11.14. 4 4 < a � iie� ” L: 1.;,;.,!...„*. ,, , ..,''' - c on ,Distcts "Tz 9 pp • ria "' f`'� �,.°' ���`� �� r01.1.'4::'..;',.:,!4,170. .,e +- { .41". .' 7: I "KKi i 1Yft$�$�TW e� .°} .,1,,,,...ii..,,1:),,,,,:ti,:si:1 ..:.1.._ ' lit''''''' il-- :'! :,,!'".7.,r,,,e;:. :„:''''''.1'?.4' 11111: 1 111,:eitii,I.1_,...' ,...'.1:'---,:-.',-.. 1.,ikg.' .. ..'"...S.:%-::i.-:.....;..:''''''';' - . ' ..4 . i ,. Mayor o Middle School off SE194' Street •,==•••.;.....,=4,===.=F:== 1 J I ,cations ord ,ersure Renton current level of service E, p r" a Keaton Plateau PAA, City *1:':?``..*. •' :'• , 2 additional new employees ng, Renton could anticipate an ,.Qi •e c f$263,00.0 based on existing tho i additional development) VIIi '''''. '�• • c exist by bringing area in at one ' � � Q c ,. l realized with smaller lAtilas rd5; ;YK: 1 .. 10 o- %nude staffing up now and o�rg�thsrvice provider for this area 4 0 �t gnew development under Renton's + de elopment regulations rather y 'of e County '' **''‘,41i;;;;;;4 !7.::',4-:li; ',;::::,- ,w. ,, �� p''''* i # ..rfp;otts poi k ' r� nig . . i 4 fo:nmer resolution in February caps m e rtot,to place the proposition of k,,,,,,,,, ... . ,.. _ before the voters at this tune rtr;,-.1 ., ..-,, . ., ...,+ re,. .,„,, p Vr- ar not yet been prezoned City 2� , eves = s°preare to put zoning issue on ers bold two or more public hearings rd,i,„11.44,,,. hen rt will be able to present sub- 'ar 9 I+, ,,., abons`consistent with the new listi, � ttidents and get their 11 a ' $ `'4• ''.'T ti debted less a &d ded not to place A.144 i� • bpi-her voters wished to - 1.eu1.ropo 't.t nate share of City's '2''''t.' .. ?te ->Y �'� � �:��dlrigindebtedness on the ''-'::,'"4:11.0 ya ti ,,,,i, .w� �� C� �<eek y� Mand n indebtedness is small i',.:�POMWN ' ear retirement p ,✓ a � w 7 • Auld be rem,required to ass it f�aa4-vs sus'3- � l fl ti;-;....tttic. ,' . ;::-!..s.-;,-4---,- ;.izq''''.7.''''.4kiir.,;64,--':',"':- - r , se 1' eserve Our Plateau -,'A 1 consist with Benson's Camp Plan A ho ° ..LOW density single-family " A Foi�sistent with relevant Countywide tir A A fi les;-;, . istent'w.th Boundary Review yY e 1 A ec4vess Arid ,� n.• 41/4',;•,:• 14 th BRI 's Findings & Decision 12 g s . tl:**' '''ii*-'0 ti..''''');!'::',":,-,;,1",;,-i'eamittg*,'":. 3 Qen a .on' ti -117:44, +� atton recommends that Council I*, f ' ' poi indicating February 6, 200,87 as V� ' s. -.0 + ; '0 �te for an election on the quests©n 0. rostered voters in the POPA favor • * •Iff,9tannexation to the City of Renton ♦;City,Clerk to transmit this resolution, gRenton's preferred" election date, to ,, '' i 1 Ai ditar S 4). 1 gym.: ,f::::`' g N4--N _ z, • a ."•••,,,*:***$3* '''.w.4,,- ...i,,,. ..,,,::.' ''4.—: - •i•'74.4t%t''4't:V r;:St:.. 13 ti` Y O� ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND � : , LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • MEMORANDUM DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The Maplewood Golf Course driving range will be closed for perimeter netting replacement beginning September 18th. The project is scheduled to be completed and the driving range re-opened by October 2nd. The golf course and restaurant will remain open during normal business hours during the project. PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • With the help of a federal mediator, Waste Management and Teamsters Local 174 reached a tentative agreement late last night (September 10th). The contract will be presented to the mechanics tomorrow evening (September 11th) with a recommendation for acceptance from the Union's bargaining team. As part of the agreement, all collection services resumed on a regular schedule this morning (September 11th), with all employees returning to work. • The Regional Transportation Improvement District (RTID) and Sound Transit are hosting an open house on the subject of"East King: Roads and Transit" on September 13th. The Open House will be held at the Meydenbauer Center(11100 NE 6th Avenue in Bellevue) from 4:30 to 7:30 p.m. RECEIVE( SEP 1 1 2006 C.)ti`�Y ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, ANP,TON Ory COUNCIL • ♦ LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT .11 \*.P�NTo� MEMORANDUM DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members, Renton City Councilou VIA: Kathy Keolker, MayoF il� FROM: olarty Wine,Assistant Chief Administrative Officer STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, Planning Manager, EDNSP SUBJECT: Preserve Our Plateau Annexation ISSUE: Should the City Council request that King County call a special municipal election to consider the annexation of Preserve our Plateau Annexation area in 2007? If yes, Council has 30 days from the time of BRB decision transmittal to request an election date from King County. The City received the BRB decision on August 14. When should the election be held in 2007? Choices include February, March, April, May, September, or November, 2007. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council approve a resolution calling for King County to hold a special municipal election for placement on February 6, 2007 election ballot. The rationale for this recommendation is as follows: • Although residents right now prefer to remain unincorporated, there are issues within Renton's control, including zoning, and information about taxes and services, that could potentially change opinion with adequate information. • Renton would experience financial benefits by having an election in February if the effective date of the election is March 1, 2007. The timing of annexation is particularly important to leverage property tax receipts, and in this case, represents the first step in a series of interlocal agreements with King County to make Annexation Initiative funding available if the area annexes. o If a March 1, 2007 effective date is possible,then the City can collect revenue (property taxes, state-shared revenues) in the area in 2007. Council President Randy Corman Page 2 of 2 September 11,2006 o King County has offered Annexation Initiative funding through a draft interlocal agreement to assist with offsetting the costs of transition and planning. • If the election fails, it is likely that annexations will proceed through the 60% petition process. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The BRB held a public hearing about the Preserve our Plateau Annexation(POPA)on June 14, 2006, and supported the annexation without modifications on August 10, 2006. State law requires that the City of Renton act on BRB's decision within 30 days of receipt of the BRB's decision,which was August 14. Tonight's meeting is the next regular meeting following the BRB decision, The City must now indicate to the county auditor its preference for a special election date for submitting the proposal to the voters. The county legislative authority must set the election date on the date indicated by the city. In 2005 and 2006, the City has conducted outreach meetings jointly with King County, and a survey which showed that given the choice, most residents in the area would prefer to remain unincorporated, and many hold that opinion strongly or very strongly. The single most important issue in potentially changing minds is development density and quality in the area. Other concerns include public safety, tax burden, preservation of open space, and extension of sewer in the area. Council will reconsider the sewer moratorium prior to the election date. The existing sewer moratorium is scheduled to expire in December 2006 after its past extension for six months in July 2006. Without a sewer moratorium, development occurring in the interim would develop to the County standards. Council has the option to extend the moratorium through March 2007 or allow the moratorium to expire and continue to issue permits based on Renton's Comprehensive Plan RLD land use designation. Pre-zoning issues are anticipated to be handled with an East Renton Advisory Task Force and Renton Planning Commission to be convened this month and their work through January on community planning issues, and beyond on service issues that are important to the community. A minimum of two public hearings on zoning will need to be held in the future. The Administration also plans to provide neutral, factual information about the implications of annexation on Renton and respond to questions about public services it could provide in the area. CONCLUSION: The purpose of this resolution is to request a February 6, 2007 election date of King County. We cannot predict how voters in the area will vote, but the election date is timed to give us through January, 2007 to address important issues such as pre-zoning and public outreach, and potentially tie together the sewer moratorium and interlocal agreement with King County to address residential development concerns on the Plateau. DRAFT September 18,2006 The Honorable Shawn Bunney, Executive Board Chair Regional Transportation Investment District(RTID) 1941 26th Ave. Seattle, WA 98112 Dear Chair Bunney: The City of Renton is hereby submitting its formal comments on the RTID "Blueprint for Progress"which was released by the District on January 26, 2006. In particular, the City of Renton is strongly supportive of the Interstate 405 project, from State Route169 to Interstate 90. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) analyses of corridor congestion show that this segment of I-405 is one of the most gridlocked in the entire central Puget Sound region. The investment in improvements along this portion of the corridor truly demonstrates the concept of"fix the worst first." Additionally, this project continues the implementation of the I-405 plan which was formally adopted after an exemplary and extensive collaborative process by an Executive Committee consisting of all affected jurisdictions and interest groups. As you know, I-405 is a prime example of the types of projects which the Washington Legislature had in mind in enacting E2SSB 6140, creating RTID. The I-405 corridor(along with SR167 south of it) is the premier north-south travel corridor on the east side of King County and is an excellent companion to the Sound Transit emphasis on light rail to serve the north-south travel patterns on the west side of the region. This fulfills the regional desire to see RTID and ST2 projects complement each other. While the City of Renton would have preferred to see Sound Transit support Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) which is part of the formally adopted I-405 Corridor plan (and the ST Long Range Vision), as one of its Sound Transit 2 (ST2) High Capacity Transit (HCT)projects, we recognize that there isn't sufficient funding for all the large projects, no matter how meritorious they may be. But I-405, as contemplated in the Blueprint, will enable the BRT features to be implemented in the future. The I-405 project also has a direct connection to a number of Renton Sound Transit projects—both in the original Sound Move and in the proposed ST2 project list. The N. 8th Street Direct Access ramp, a funded Sound Move project, requires the widening of I- 405 as proposed in the Blueprint. In addition, ST2 project E25, the N. 8th Street parking facility, builds on the direct access ramp project. Both will enable future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), an integral part of the I-405 adopted plan and the formal Record of Decision. Animmornowess The City of Renton also supports the State Routel67 improvements in the Blueprint—for many of the reasons we support I-405; together they are, as mentioned above, the main north-south travel route on the east side of King County all the way to Pierce County. However, one observation we would make is that there is a missing link in the Blueprint —the omission of any project to address the worst congested interchange in the State of Washington: I-405 and SR167. We believe that this omission was in large part due to the original estimates for such an interchange improvement—another$1 Billion plus project. We now know from the design and conceptual engineering work done by WSDOT that an I-405/SR167 "HOV to HOV" or"HOT Lane to HOT Lane"project can be constructed for somewhere around$400 million. We urge you to consider incorporating this valuable system enhancement in a revised Blueprint—but, we would vigorously oppose any proposal that inserts 1405/SR167 at the expense of either the 1-405 (SR169 to 1-90) or SR167 corridor improvements proposed in the existing Blueprint. One last point the City would like to make involves a project the $237 million category shown as "Additional Investments and Contingency" in the Blueprint. The SW27th Street/Strander Blvd. Bridge would provide a direct connection over the BNSF and UPRR tracks between a new Tukwila urban center and a major planned office park in Renton(on the Boeing Longacres property) with a capacity for 2.5-3.0 million square feet of space. This provides a major east-west connection as well as major freight movement benefits. In addition, the $25 million project will provide primary access to the Tukwila Sounder Station—and would provide another example of the RTID major corridor projects complementing ST2 projects. It fits in with other proposed RTID major corridor projects in that it improves traffic on I-405 and SR167, and it is the type of project that will enhance support of RTID within the freight community that includes truckers, railroads, ports, member of the "FAST Corridor" group and others. This segment of the private and public sectors could be very helpful in assisting with passage of an RTID ballot measure. The City would be requesting $25 million from RTID. Previous and funded improvements in this project add up to about $15 million. In sum, the City of Renton is very supportive of the above projects as proposed in the Blueprint and looks forward to supporting them in an RTID ballot measure. Sincerely, Mayor Council 97999999 RTID Presentation Outline — Sept. 13 and 27, 2006 My name is ; I am a(position)in Renton. I would like to make a few comments in response to the "Blue Print for Progress"released by RTID in January, 2006. ❖ The City of Renton has written a formal letter, a copy of which I provided the staff; my intent is to go over the highlights of the city letter. Thank you for this opportunity. ❖ We commend the District for being able to put forward such a compelling set of significant transportation projects for the Puget Sound region. ❖ In particular, we want to emphasize the importance of the I-405 project, I-90 to SR169, as described in the Blueprint. ❖ The I-405 project was arguably the "poster child" of projects in the legislation creating RTID, and for very good reasons. ❖ The 1-405 Executive Committee, with many jurisdictions and agencies, and in an exemplary process, developed the I-405 Implementation Plan and adopted a preferred option in a Record of Decision in 2002. ❖ This project is the most significant north-south travel corridor in east King County, and connects to SR167 all the way to Pierce County. It's also one of the most congested. ❖ The I-405 proposed improvements would enable a key Sound Transit funded project from Sound Move—the North 8th Street Direct Access ramp. And it will do the same for a ST2 proposed project—the parking structure at North 8th Street. It is therefore compatible with Sound Transit—one of the principles of the joint ballot. Together these improvements will enable future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)—the formally adopted I-405 plan AND the formally adopted Sound Transit Long Range vision for High Capacity Transit in east King County. ❖ The City of Renton also supports the planned SR167 improvements in the Blueprint. If anything, RTID should seek ways to include a better interchange connection between I- 405 and SR167 -- one of the worst choke points in the state. Such an interchange for HOV/HOT lanes would cost about $400 million, considerably less than the $1 Billion plus which was assumed for this connection back in January. ❖ Finally, Renton is proposing a project for the $237 million "additional investments and contingency category" -- $25 million for the SW27th Street/Strander Blvd. bridge over the BNSF and UPRR tracks, connecting Renton and Tukwila. This would provide great freight benefits, be directly related to I-405 and SR167 improvements, and connect a new urban center in Tukwila with up to 3 million sq. ft. of employment planned for the Boeing Longacres site. AND this is the prime connection between Renton and the Tukwila Sounder Station. ,4ud/e 'ce eommcM t 9-1�-aoa6 geierred fo 1-ina'ir3 eommdtee Good Afternoon Madam Mayor and Members of the Renton City Council, My name is Lenard Reeves and with me is Marilyn Harris, we both lived at 2313 SE 8th Drive, Renton, Washington 98055. We are here to ask you, Madam Mayor and Renton City Council to grant us an adjustment to our high water bills due to a leak in the water service line to our home in Renton, in the Falcon Ridge Planned Unit Development. We bought and lived in our house for over 18 years and the house was built in 1986. From about July 2005 to this August 2006, we have paid increasingly large monthly water bills to the City. For water charges alone, we have paid $400 to $550 for every 2-month billing period for the last 12-month period, on top of the charges we paid for other City's utilities. Our average water bill would be around $40 for 2 months if we could have found the leak and repaired it sooner. Once we noticed the high water bills, we checked with the City and we were informed that we have a leak in our water service line. We also found out that our water meter was over 200 feet away from our front property line and that the water service line to our house was installed in an unknown location under a ditch along the roadway and also under the concrete driveway of our neighbor's property. When the Planned Unit development was built in 1986, the developer did not place the water meter in front of the street frontage of our lot. This would have been the standard location for water meters for residential subdivision required by City's regulations. As such, the builder installed a long water service line to our house, and put the line under the ditch along the roadway and also under our neighbor's concrete driveway. Water that leaked from the pipe did not come up to the ground surface, which made the leak difficult to find. We have hired 2 plumbers to find the leak for repairs but they could not locate it. We then asked the City for assistance, and the water maintenance staff came cult with locating equipment and also they could not find the service line. They suggest that we paid for a new meter to be placed in front of our property and that we replace the entire line from the house to the new meter. Last month, we paid $600 to the City to have a new water meter installed in front of our lot and we also paid $1000 to a plumber to replace the line from the house to the new meter last week. We understand that the City has recently adopted an ordinance for water leak adjustment and that the adjustment would be limited to only 2 billing periods. We have diligently made effort to find and repair the leak, while continuing to pay lager water bills for the last 12 months, and have paid for the new meter and new service line. We ask for your consideration to allow a leak adjustment for a twelve-month period and we would accept your final determination on this matter. Thank you. Marilyn Harris & Lenard Reeves 2313 SE 8th Drive Renton, WA 98055 Utility Billing Account History ListUser: abdoulg . : I i y;' � _' Service Address: 2313 SE 8TH DR ,rs l� r � f‘,i Reference Number: 340403 Owner Name: HARRIS,MARILYN 1 F Account Status: Active Home Phone: (425)235-0920 Ext /FI. \-` Connect Date: 09/11/1987 Business Phone: ( ) Ext Customer Name: HARRIS, MARILYN r � 11ing Cycle: 5 jy i iftcc number: 006575000 Customer Address: 23i3 SE 8TH DR \ 1 L , \ ount Due: 1,350.97 RENTON,WA 98055 3946RouteNumber: 34 Sequence Number: 040300 Serial Number: 39204102 Date Type Amount Description Water Sewer Storm Metro Garbage Penalty Misc uiapp ca I Read Dt Reads Cons Service Balance: 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 55.30 0.00 0.00 08-23-06 Adj 60.00 Shut off fee delinq 60.00 07/17/2006 1,509 262 08-22-06 Adj 7.79 Penalty 10% 7.79 05/12/2006 1,247 196 07-28-06 Bal 1,283.18 974.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 47.51 03/14/2006 1,051 180•-- 07-28-06 Bil 609.73 543.24 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 01/13/2006 871 169 07-20-06 Adj - Penalty 10% 47.51 11/14/2005 702 165 06-29-06 Pay 00.00 -1.56 -4.85 -293.59 09/14/2005 537 128 06-29-06 Bal 925. 4 432.88 41.91 16.65 76.80 64.11 293.59 07/18/2005 409 93 06-29-06 Bil 77.85 11.36 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 05/16/2005 316 63 05-31-06 Pay -150.15 -84.80 -13.97 -5.55 -25.60 -20.23 03/14/2005 253 50 05-30-06 Bal 998.24 506.32 41.91 16.65 76.80 62.97 293.59 01/14/2005 203 37 05-30-06 Bit475.09 408.60 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 11/15/2004 166 28 05-15-06 Pay (:150.00) -148.86 -1.14 09/14/2004 138 21 04-27-06 Bal 673.15 246.58 27.94 11.10 51.20 42.74 293.59 07/19/2004 117 20 )4-27-06 Bil 77.85 11.36 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 05/14/2004 97 7 /04-13-06 Adj , . .'' NSF/Returned Item) 71.36 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 293.59 03/16/2004 80 5 k04-13-06 Adj 5.01 NSF fee f 15.00 01/19/2004 65 6 04-12-06 Adj - Interfund Transfer -227.10 -13.97 -5.55 -25.60 -21.37 293.59 11/15/2003 49 6 03-30-06 Bal •: :6 375.96 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 -293.59 0C/16/2003 33 7 _..4,03-30-06 Bil 42.45 375.96 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 07/16/2003 16 4 03-24-06 Pay -,4 -71.36 -13.97 -5.55 -25.60 -21.37 -293.59 05/15/2003 2 2 03-23-06 Pay -4 3--353.52 -13.97 -5.55 -25.60 -21.37 -11.43 05/01/2003 ,810 7 03-23-06 Adj 60.00 Shut off fee delinq 60.00 03/18/2003 ,803 1 02-27-06 Bal 509.29 364.88 27.94 11.10 51.20 42.74 11.43 01/20/2003 ,792 0 02-27-06 Bil 77.85 11.36 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 11/18/2002 ,782 1 02-22-06 Pay -250.00 -147.04 -13.43 -5.39 -25.60 -21.37 -37.17 09/18/2002 ,771 4 02-14-06 Adj 7.68 Penalty 10% 7.68 07/15/2002 ,757 0 01-31-06 Pay -200.00 -199.12 -0.88 05/17/2002 ,747 0 01-30-06 Bal 873.76 699.68 28.28 10.94 51.20 42.74 40.92 03/20/2002 ,737 0 01-30-06 Bil 420.01 353.52 13.97 5.55 25.60 21.37 01/17/2002 ,727 0 01-18-06 Adj 33.60 Penalty 10% 33.60 11/21/200 ,717 1 01-05-06 Pay -150.00 -11.03 -25.98 -10.78 -51.20 -39.12 -11.89 09/19/200 ,706 0 2-29-05 Bal 570.15 357.19 40.29 16.17 76.80 60.49 19.21 07/18/200 ,696 1 2-29-05 Bit 76.82 11.03 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 05/15/200 ,685 9 2-13-05 Adj 7.32 Penalty 10% 7.32 03/16/200 ,676 9 1-30-05 Pay -125.00 -118.93 -3.62 -2.45 01/15/200 ,667 9 1-29-05 Bal 611.01 465.09 26.86 10.78 51.20 42.74 14.34 1 1/17/2000 ,658 10 1-29-05 Bil 400.92 335.13 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 09/19/2000 ,648 1I Billing Cycle: 5 Customer Name: HARRIS,MARILYN Account Number: 006575 000 Amount Due: 1,350.97 Customer Address: 2313 SE 8TH DR RENTON,WA 98055-3946 Route Number: 34 Sequence Number: 040300 Serial Number: 39204102 Date Type Amount Description Water Sewer Storm Metro Garbage Penalty Misc unapp ca I Read Dt Reads Cons Service Balance: 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 55.30 0.00 0.00 11-22-05 Adj 11.89 Penalty 10% 11.89 07/20/2000 ,637 12 11-16-05 Pay -125.00 -125.00 05/18/2000 ,625 10 10-28-05 Bal 323.20 254.96 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 2.45 03/23/2000 ,615 11 I0-28-05 Bil 76.82 11.03 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 01/20/2000 ,604 20 10-27-05 Pay -125.00 -28.97 -26.86 -5.43 -25.60 -21.37 -16.77 11/22/1999 ,584 19 10-17-05 Adj 2.45 Penalty 10% 2.45 09/23/1999 ,565 28 09-29-05 Bal 368.93 272.90 26.86 5.43 25.60 21.37 16.77 07/20/1999 ,537 104 09-29-05 Bil 327.66 261.87 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 05/19/1999 ,433 32 09-22-05 Pay -220.00 -167.68 -5.35 -25.60 -21.37 03/22/1999 ,401 7 09-20-05 Adj 16.77 Penalty 10% 16.77 01/22/1999 ,394 33 08-30-05 Bal 244.50 178.71 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 11/23/1998 ,361 13 08-30-05 Bil 76.82 11.03 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 N/A 0 0 08-23-05 Adj Interfund Transfer N/A 0 0 08-09-05 Pay -167.50 -35.92 -26.86 -10.78 -51.20 -28.44 -14.30 N/A 0 0 07-28-05 Bal 335.18 203.60 26.86 10.78 51.20 28.44 14.30 N/A 0 0 07-28-05 Bil 258.36 192.57 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 N/A 0 0 07-13-05 Pay -162.65 -133.17 -9.83 -14.30 -5.35 N/A 0 0 07-12-05 Adj 14.30 Penalty 10% 14.30 N/A 0 0 06-29-05 Bal 225.17 144.20 23.26 5.39 25.60 21.37 5.35 N/A 0 0 06-29-05 Bil 76.82 11.03 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 N/A 0 0 06-24-05 Pay -130.00 -11.03 -17.03 -10.78 -49.29 -29.37 -12.50 N/A 0 0 06-21-05 Adj 5.35 Penalty 10% 5.35 N/A 0 0 05-27-05 Bal 273.00 144.20 26.86 10.78 49.29 29.37 12.50 N/A 0 0 05-27-05 Bil 198.96 133.17 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 N/A 0 0 05-23-05 Pay -150.00 -107.43 -13.43 -4.18 -1.91 -21.37 -1.68 N/A 0 0 05-18-05 Adj 12.50 Penalty 10% 12.50 N/A 0 0 05-27-05 Bil 8.00 05/09/2005 Import 8.00 N/A 0 0 04-28-05 Bal 203.54 118.46 26.86 9.57 25.60 21.37 1.68 N/A 0 0 04-28-05 Bil 76.82 11.03 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-21-05 Pay -125.00 -11.03 -13.43 -6.60 -51.20 -42.74 N/A 0 0 04-I5-05 Adj 1.68 Penalty 10% 1.68 N/A 0 0 03-30-05 Bal 250.04 118.46 26.86 10.78 51.20 42.74 N/A 0 0 03-30-05 Bil 173.22 107.43 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 N/A 0 0 03-01-05 Pay -152.71 -81.69 -13.43 -5.39 -25.60 -21.37 -5.23 N/A (1 0 02-25-05 Bal 229.53 92.72 26.86 10.78 51.20 42.74 5.23 N/A 0 0 02-25-05 Bil 76.82 11.03 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 N/A 0 0 02-25-05 Adj -60.00 Shut off fee delinq -60.00 N/A 0 0 01-28-05 Bal 212.71 141.69 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 5.23 N/A 0 0 01-28-05 Bil 147.48 81.69 13.43 5.39 25.60 21.37 N/A 0 0 01-24-05 Pay -80.00 -10.82 -13.04 -5.39 -23.40 -21.12 -6.23 N/A 0 0 01-19-05 Pay -114.85 -62.54 -13.04 -5.39 -23.40 -10.48 N/A 0 0 01-19-05 Adj 60.00 Shut off fee delinq 60.00 N/A 0 0 01-18-05 Adj 11.46 Penalty 10% 11.46 N/A 0 0 12-30-04 Bal 188.62 73.36 26.08 10.78 46.80 31.60 N/A 0 0 12-30-04 Bil 74.02 10.82 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 12-14-04 Pay -85.00 -10.82 -13.04 -5.39 -23.40 -32.35 N/A 0 0 11-29-04 Bal 199.60 73.36 26.08 10.78 46.80 42.58 N/A 0 0 11-29-04 Bil 125.74 62.54 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 Billing Cycle: 5 Customer Name: HARRIS,MARILYN Account Number: 006575 000 Amount Due: 1,350.97 Customer Address: 2313 SE 8TH DR RENTON,WA 98055-3946 Route Number: 34 Sequence Number: 040300 Serial'Number: 39204102 Date Type Amount Description Water Sewer Storm Metro Garbage Penalty Misc unapp ca I Read Dt Reads Cons Service Balance: 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 55.30 0.00 0.00 11-08-04 Pay -122.00 Shut off fee delinq -48.96 -13.04 -5.39 -23.40 -21.53 -9.68 N/A 0 0 10-28-04 Bal 195.86 59.78 26.08 10.78 46.80 42.74 9.68 N/A 0 0 10-28-04 Bil 74.02 10.82 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 09-29-04 Bal 121.84 48.96 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 9.68 N/A 0 0 09-29-04 Bil 112.16 48.96 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 09-27-04 Pay -181.00 -57.84 -26.08 -10.78 -46.80 -38.57 -0.93 N/A 0 0 09-14-04 Adj 10.61 Penalty 10% 10.61 N/A 0 0 08-30-04 Bal 180.07 57.84 26.08 10.78 46.80 38.57 N/A 0 0 08-30-04 Bil 74.02 10.82 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 08-04-04 Adj Interfund Transfer -4.17 4.17 N/A 0 0 07-29-04 Bal 106.05 47.02 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 -4.17 N/A 0 0 07-29-04 Bil 110.22 47.02 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 07-27-04 Pay -77.00 -10.82 -13.04 -5.39 -23.40 -20.18 -4.17 N/A 0 0 06-29-04 Pay -r05.00 -41.59 -13.04 -5.39 -23.40 -21.58 N/A 0 0 06-29-04 Bal 177.83 52.41 26.08 10.78 46.80 41.76 N/A 0 0 06-29-04 Bil 74.02 10.82 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 06-01-04 Pay -75.00 -10.82 -13.04 -5.39 -23.40 -22.35 N/A 0 0 05-27-04 Bal 178.81 52.41 26.08 10.78 46.80 42.74 N/A 0 0 05-27-04 Bil 104.79 41.59 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-29-04 Bal 74.02 10.82 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-29-04 Bil 74.02 10.82 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-19-04 Pay -182.59 -48.79 -26.08 -10.78 -46.80 -42.74 -7.40 N/A 0 0 04-14-04 Adj 7.40 Past Due Charge,D 7.40 N/A 0 0 03-30-04 Bal 175.19 48.79 26.08 10.78 46.80 42.74 N/A 0 0 03-30-04 Bil 101.17 37.97 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 02-26-04 Bal 74.02 10.82 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 02-26-04 Bil 74.02 10.82 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 02-25-04 Pay -243.63 -110.28 -25.70 -10.78 -46.80 -42.74 -7.33 N/A 0 0 02-25-04 Adj 60.00 Past Due Charge,D 60.00 N/A 0 0 02-18-04 Adj 7.33 Past Due Charge,D 7.33 N/A 0 0 01-29-04 Bal 176.30 50.28 25.70 10.78 46.80 42.74 N/A 0 0 I 01-29-04 Bil 102.98 39.78 13.04 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 01-07-04 Pay -104.80 -41.98 -12.66 -5.39 -23.40 -21.37 N/A 0 0 2-30-03 Bal 178.12 52.48 25.32 10.78 46.80 42.74 N/A 0 0 2-30-03 Bil 73.32 10.50 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 2-03-03 Pay -70.00 -7.18 -12.66 -5.39 -23.40 -21.37 N/A 0 0 1-25-03 Bal 174.80 49.16 25.32 10.78 46.80 42.74 N/A 0 0 1-25-03 Bil 101.48 38.66 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 1-04-03 Pay -102.84 -40.42 -12.66 -5.39 -23.40 -20.97 N/A 0 0 0-30-03 Bal 176.16 50.92 25.32 10.78 46.80 42.34 N/A 0 0 0-30-03 Bil 73.32 10.50 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 0-02-03 Adj Interfund Transfer -0.40 0.40 N/A 0 0 09-29-03 Bal 102.84 40.42 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 -0.40 N/A (1 0 09-29-03 Bil 103.24 40.42 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 09-24-03 Pay -179.63 -45.64 -25.32 -10.78 -46.80 -41.06 -9.63 -0.40 N/A 0 0 09-16-03 Adj 9.63 Past Due Charge,D 9.63 N/A 0 0 08-28-03 Bal 169.60 45.64 25.32 10.78 46.80 41.06 N/A 0 0 08-28-03 Bil 73.32 10.50 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 Billing Cycle: 5 Customer Name: HARRIS,MARILYN Account Number: 006575 000 Amount Due: 1,350.97 Customer Address: 2313 SE 8TH DR RENTON,WA 98055-3946 Route Number: 34 Sequence Number: 040300 Serial Number: 39204102 Date Type Amount Description Water Sewer Storm Metro Garbage Penalty Miscunapp ca I Read Dt Reads Cons Service Balance: 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 55.30 0.00 0.00 08-07-03 Pay -75.00 -10.50 -12.66 -5.39 -23.40 -23.05 N/A 0 0 07-30-03 Bal 171.28 45.64 25.32 10.78 46.80 42.74 NJA 0 0 07-30-03 Bil 97.96 35.14 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 07-08-03 Pay -69.81 -26.34 -12.66 -5.39 -18.09 -7.33 N/A 0 0 06-27-03 Bal 143.13 36.84 25.32 10.78 41.49 21.37 7.33 N/A 0 0 06-27-03 Bil 73.32 10.50 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 06-24-03 Pay -100.00 -10.50 -12.66 -5.39 -28.71 -42.74 N/A 0 0 06-18-03 Adj 7.33 Past Due Charge,D 7.33 N/A 0 0 05-29-03 Bal 162.48 6.84) 25.32 10.78 46.80 42.74 N/A 0 0 05-29-03 Bil 89.16 26. d 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-29-03 Bal 73.32 10.50 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-29-03 Bil 73.32 10.50 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-23-03 Pay -214.50 -60.36 -25.32 -10.78 -46.80 -54.74 -16.50 N/A 0 0 04-23-03 Adj 20.00 Past Due Charge,D 20.00 N/A 0 0 04-15-03 Adj 8.53 Past Due Charge,D 8.53 N/A 0 0 03-28-03 Bal 185.97 (110).:36)3 25.32 10.78 46.80 54.74 7.97 N/A 0 0 03-28-03 Bil 92.68 2861 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 02-27-03 Bal 93.29 10.50 12.66 5.39 23.40 33.37 7.97 N/A 0 0 02-27-03 Bil 73.32 10.50 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 02-26-03 Pay -180.00 -38.60 -24.95 -10.78 -46.80 -58.74 -0.13 N/A 0 0 02-27-03 Bil 12.00 02/17/2003 Import 12.00 N/A 0 0 02-18-03 Adj - 8.10 Past Due Charge,D 8.10 N/A 0 0 01-30-03 Bal 179.87 38.60 24.95 10.78 46.80 58.74 N/A 0 0 01-30-03 Bil 90.92 28.10 12.66 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 ( 1-30-03 Bil 8.00 01/27/2003 Import 8.00 N/A 0 0 2-30-02 Bal 80.95 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 29.37 N/A 0 0 2-30-02 Bil 72.95 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 2-30-02 Bil 8.00 12/23/2002 Import 8.00 N/A 0 0 2-18-02 Pay -192.56 -60.36 -24.58 -10.78 -46.80 -42.74 -7.30 N/A 0 0 2-18-02 Adj 7.30 Past Due Charge, D 7.30 N/A 0 0 2-18-02 Adj 20.00 Past Due Charge,D 20.00 N/A 0 0 1-26-02 Bal 165.26 40.36 24.58 10.78' 46.80 42.74 N/A 0 0 1-26-02 Bil 92.31 29.86 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 0-30-02 Bal 72.95 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 0-30-02 Bil 72.95 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 0-23-02 Pay -198.64 -65.64 -24.58 -10.78 -46.80 -42.74 -8.10 N/A 0 0 0-23-02 Adj 20.00 Past Due Charge,D 20.00 N/A 0 0 0-I5-02 Adj 7.30 Past Due Charge,D 7.30 N/A 0 0 09-27-02 Bal 171.34 45.64 24.58 10.78 46.80 42.74 0.80 N/A 0 0 09-27-02 Bil 97.59 35.14 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 08-29-02 Bal 73.75 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 0.80 N/A 0 0 08-29-02 Bil 72.95 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 08-28-02 Pay -190.00 -58.60 -24.58 -10.78 -46.80 -42.74 -6.50 N/A 0 0 08-13-02 Adj 7.30 Past Due Charge,D 7.30 N/A 0 0 07-29-02 Bal 183.50 58.60 24.58 10.78 46.80 42.74 N/A 0 - 0 07-29-02 Bil 90.55 28.10 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 06-27-02 Bal 92.95 30.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 06-27-02 Bil 72.95 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 Billing Cycle: 5 Customer Name: HARRIS,MARILYN Account Number: 006575 000 Amount Due: 1,350.97 Customer Address: 2313 SE 8TH DR RENTON,WA 98055-3946 Route Number: 34 Sequence Number: 040300 Serial Number: 39204102 I Date Type Amount Description Water Sewer Storm Metro Garbage Penalty Misc unapp ca Read Dt Reads Cons Service Balance: 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 55.30 0.00 0.00 06-26-02 Pay -170.37 -38.60 -24.58 -10.78 -46.80 -42.35 -7.26 N/A 0 0 06-26-02 Adj 20.00 Past Due Charge,D 20.00 N/A 0 0 06-14-02 Adj 7.26 Past Due Charge,D 7.26 N/A 0 0 05-30-02 Bal 163.11 38.60 24.58 10.78 46.80 42.35 N/A 0 0 05-30-02 Bil 90.55 28.10 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-30-02 Adj Interfund Transfer -0.39 0.39 N/A 0 0 04-29-02 Bal 72.56 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 -0.39 N/A 0 0 04-29-02 Bil 72.95 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 04-24-02 Pay -141.12 -38.60 -24.58 -10.78 -33.23 -21.37 -12.17 -0.39 N/A 0 0 04-23-02 Adj 3.80 Past Due Charge,D 3.80 N/A 0 0 03-28-02 Bal 136.93 38.60 24.58 10.78 33.23 21.37 8.37 N/A 0 0 03-28-02 Bil 90.55 28.10 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 03-27-02 Pay -125.00 -28.10 -12.29 -5.39 -36.97 -35.93 -6.32 N/A 0 0 03-18-02 Adj 8.37 Past Due Charge,D 8.37 N/A 0 0 02-27-02 Bal 163.01 38.60 24.58 10.78 46.80 35.93 6.32 N/A 0 0 02-27-02 Bil 72.95 10.50 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 02-26-02 Pay -70.00 -10.50 -12.29 -5.39 -19.75 -22.07 N/A 0 0 02-13-02 Adj 6.32 Past Due Charge,D 6.32 N/A 0 0 01-30-02 Bal 153.74 38.60 24.58 10.78 43.15 36.63 N/A 0 0 01-30-02 Bil 90.55 28.10 12.29 5.39 23.40 21.37 N/A 0 0 01-17-02 Adj Interfund Transfer -5.09 5.09 N/A 0 0 2-28-01 Bal 63.19 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 -5.09 N/A 0 0 2-28-01 Bil 68.28 10.54 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 2-19-01 Pay -175.00 -40.36 -24.58 -10.78 -39.50 -48.30 -6.39 -5.09 N/A 0 0 1-29-01 Bal 169.91 40.36 24.58 10.78 39.50 48.30 6.39 N/A 0 0 1-29-01 Bil .87.64 29.86 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 1-29-01 Bil 7.60 11/19/2001 Import 7.60 N/A 0 0 0-30-01 Bal 74.67 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 6.39 N/A 0 0 0-30-01 Bil 68.28 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 0-25-01 Pay -166.00 -38.60 -24.58 -10.78 -39.50 -52.10 -0.44 N/A 0 0 0-17-01 Adj 6.83 Past Due Charge,D 6.83 N/A 0 0 09-27-01 Bal 165.56 38.60 24.58 10.78 39.50 52.10 N/A 0 0 09-27-01 Bil 85.88 28.10 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 09-27-01 Bil 11.40 09/03/2001 Import 11.40 N/A 0 0 08-30-01 Bal 68.28 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 08-30-01 Bil 68.28 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 08-30-01 Pay -179.58 -60.36 -24.58 -10.78 -39.50 -37.82 -6.54 N/A 0 0 08-29-01 Adj 20.00 Past Due Charge,D 20.00 N/A 0 0 08-15-01 Adj 6.54 Past Due Charge,D 6.54 N/A 0 0 07-30-01 Bal 153.04 40.36 24.58 10.78 39.50 37.82 N/A 0 0 07-30-01 Bil 87.64 29.86 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 06-29-01 Adj Interfund Transfer -2.88 2.88 N/A 0 0 06-28-01 Bal 65.40 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 -2.88 N/A 0 0 06-28-01 Bil 68.28 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 06-27-01 Pay -160.00 -36.84 -24.58 -10.78 -39.50 -38.78 -6.64 -2.88 N/A 0 0 06-13-01 Adj 6.64 Past Due Charge,D 6.64 N/A 0 0 05-30-01 Bal 150.48 36.84 24.58 10.78 39.50 38.78 N/A 0 0 05-30-01 Bil 84.12 26.34 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 Customer Name: HARRIS,MARILYN Billing r: 5 Account Numbbeer: 006575 000 Amount Due: 1,350.97 Customer Address: 2313 SE 8TH DR RENTON,WA 98055-3946 Route Number: 34 Sequence Number: 040300 Serial Number: 39204102 Date Type Amount Description Water Sewer Storm Metro Garbage Penalty Misc unapp ca I Read Dt Reads Cons Service Balance: 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 55.30 0.00 0.00 05-07-01 Pay -100.00 -26.34 -12.29 -5.39 -19.75 -36.23 N/A 0 0 04-27-01 Bal 166.36 36.84 24.58 10.78 39.50 54.66 N/A 0 0 04-27-01 Bit 68.28 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 03-29-01 Bal 98.08 26.34 12.29 5.39 19.75 34.31 N/A 0 0 03-29-01 Bil .84.12 26.34 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 03-23-01 Pay -168.00 -36.84 -24.58 -10.78 -39.50 -49.42 -6.88 N/A 0 0 03-21-01 Adj 6.88 Past Due Charge,D 6.88 N/A 0 0 03-29-01 Bil 7.60 03/12/2001 Import 7.60 N/A 0 0 03-29-01 Bil 22.80 03/05/2001 Import 22.80 N/A 0 0 02-27-01 Bal 144.68 36.84 24.58 10.78 39.50 32.98 N/A 0 0 02-27-01 Bil .68.28 10.50 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 02-27-01 Bil 7.60 02/05/2001 Import 7.60 N/A 0 0 02-08-01 Pay -100.00 -18.87 -12.29 -5.23 -19.50 -43.27 -0.84 N/A 0 0 01-30-01 Bal 168.80 45.21 24.58 10.62 39.25 48.30 0.84 N/A 0 0 01-30-01 Bil 84.12 26.34 12.29 5.39 19.75 20.35 N/A 0 0 01-15-01 Adj 0.84 Past Due Charge,D 0.84 N/A 0 0 01-30-01 Bit 7.60 01/01/2001 Import 7.60 N/A 0 0 2-28-00 Bal 76.24 18.87 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 2-28-00 Bil 67.87 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 2-20-00 Pay -144.00 -30.23 -24.58 -10.46 -39.00 -39.73 N/A 0 0 1-29-00 Bal 152.37 38.60 24.58 10.46 39.00 39.73 N/A 0 0 1-29-00 Bil 85.47 28.10 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 1-03-00 Pay -88.00 -29.86 -12.29 -5.23 -19.50 -21.12 N/A 0 0 0-30-00 Bal 154.90 40.36 24.58 10.46 39.00 40.50 N/A 0 0 0-30-00 Bil 67.87 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 0-09-00 Pay -73.00 -10.50 -12.29 -5.23 -19.50 -25.48 N/A 0 0 09-28-00 Bat 160.03 40.36 24.58 10.46 39.00 45.63 N/A 0 0 09-28-00 Bil 87.23 29.86 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 08-30-00 Bal 72.80 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.50 25.28 N/A 0 0 08-30-00 Bil 67.87 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 08-21-00 Pay -160.00 -42.59 -24.58 -10.46 -39.00 -43.37 N/A 0 0 08-30-00 Bit 7.60 07/31/2000 Import 7.60 N/A 0 0 07-28-00 Bal 157.33 42.59 24.58 10.46 39.00 40.70 N/A 0 0 07-28-00 Bit 88.99 31.62 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 07-I1-00 Pay -85.00 -27.63 -12.29 -5.23 -19.50 -20.35 N/A 0 0 06-29-00 Bal 153.34 38.60 24.58 10.46 39.00 40.70 N/A 0 0 06-29-00 Bil 67.87 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 05-30-00 Bal 85.47 28.10 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 05-30-00 Bil 85.47 28.10 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 05-23-00 Pay -166.35 -60.36 -24.58 -10.46 -39.00 -31.95 N/A 0 0 05-23-00 Adj 20.00 Past Due Charge,D 20.00 N/A 0 0 04-28-00 Bal 146.35 40.36 24.58 10.46 39.00 31.95 N/A 0 0 04-28-00 Bil 67.87 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 NI/A 0 0 04-25-00 Pay -90.00 -30.50 -12.29 -5.23 -19.50 -22.48 N/A 0 0 03-31-00 Bal 168.48 60.36 24.58 10.46 39.00 34.08 N/A 0 • 0 03-31-00 Bil 87.23 29.86 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 03-28-00 Pay -130.00 -46.46 -12.29 -5.23 -19.50 -46.52 N/A 0 0 03-28-00 Adj 20.00 Past Due Charge,D 20.00 N/A 0 0 Billing Cycle: 5 Customer Name: HARRIS,MARILYN Account Number: 006575 000 Amount Due: 1,350.97 Customer Address: 2313 SE 8TH DR RENTON,WA 98055-3946 Route Number: 34 Sequence Number: 040300 Serial Number: 39204102 Date Type Amount Description Water Sewer Storm Metro Garbage Penalty Misc unapp ca Read Dt Reads Cons Service Balance: 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 55.30 0.00 0.00 02-29-00 Bal 191.25 56.96 24.58 10.46 39.00 60.25 N/A 0 0 02-29-00 Bil 67.87 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.50 20.35 N/A 0 0 02-03-00 Pay -68.00 -9.74 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -21.64 N/A 0 0 02-01-00 Bal 191.38 56.20 24.58 10.46 38.60 61.54 N/A 0 0 02-01-00 Bil 122.62 45.70 12.29 5.23 19.50 39.90 N/A 0 0 01-10-00 Bil 7.40 Garbage Import 01 7.40 N/A 0 0 12-29-99 PAY -100.00 -43.94 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -19.44 N/A 0 0 12-29-99 BIL '67.07 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 11-30-99 PAY -100.00 -37.21 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -26.17 N/A 0 0 11-29-99 BIL 100.51 43.94 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 10-28-99 BIL 67.07 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 10-21-99 PAY -210.08 -85.84 -24.58 -10.46 -38.20 -51.00 N/A 0 0 10-19-99 ADJ 20.00 20.00 N/A 0 0 09-29-99 BIL 117.31 60.74 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 09-20-99 PAY -130.00 -130.00 N/A 0 0 08-30-99 BIL 67.07 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 08-30-99 BIL 11.10 EXTRA GARBAG 11.10 N/A 0 0 08-30-99 BIL 6.71 PENALTY 6.71 N/A 0 0 08-23-99 PAY -130.00 -73.43 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -19.95 N/A 0 0 08-05-99 PAY -102.00 -45.43 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -19.95 N/A 0 0 07-29-99 BIL 260.19 203.62 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 07-29-99 BIL 13.15 PENALTY 13.15 N/A 0 0 06-29-99 BIL 67.07 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 06-22-99 PAY -200.00 -86.86 -24.58 -10.46 -38.20 -39.90 N/A 0 0 06-22-99 ADJ 20.00 20.00 N/A 0 0 05-27-99 BIL 124.83 68.26 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 05-27-99 BIL 0.86 PENALTY 0.86 N/A 0 0 05-26-99 PAY -70.50 -14.03 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -19.85 N/A 0 0 04-29-99 BIL 67.07 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 04-29-99 BIL 6.71 PENALTY 6.71 N/A 0 0 04-02-99 PAY -71.00 -14.33 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -20.05 N/A 0 0 03-30-99 BIL 79.39 22.82 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 03-30-99 BIL 7.93 PENALTY 7.93 N/A 0 0 02-25-99 BIL 67.07 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.95 N/A 0 0 02-23-99 PAY -179.87 -89.46 -24.58 -10.46 -29.37 -26.00 NI/A 0 0 01-28-99 BIL 125.76 70.14 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.00 N/A 0 0 01-25-99 PAY -130.00 -33.38 -12.29 -5.23 -27.93 -51.17 N/A 0 0 2-30-98 BIL 66.12 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.00 N/A 0 0 2-30-98 BIL 3.83 PENALTY 3.83 N/A 0 0 2-14-98 BIL 7.00 EXTRA GARBAG 7.00 N/A 0 0 2-08-98 PAY -88.00 -10.55 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -40.83 N/A 0 0 1-25-98 B1L 89.00 33.38 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.00 N/A 0 0 1-25-98 BIL 8.82 PENALTY 8.82 N/A 0 0 1-12-98 BIL 7.00 EXTRA GARBAG 7.00 N/A 0 0 1-02-98 PAY -111.00 -55.38 -12.29 -5.23 -19.10 -19.00 N/A 0 0 1-02-98 BIL 7.00 EXTRA GARBAG 7.00 N/A 0 0 0-29-98 BIL 66.12 10.50 12.29 5.23 19.10 19.00 N/A 0 0 0-05-98 BIL 7.00 EXTRA GARBAG 7.00 N/A 0 0 Billing Cycle: 5 Customer Name: HARRIS,MARILYN Account Number: 006575 000 Amount Due: 1,350.97 Customer Address: 2313 SE 8TH DR RENTON,WA 98055-3946 Route Number: 34 Sequence Number: 040300 Serial Number: 39204102 Date Type Amount Description Water Sewer Storm Metro Garbage Penalty Misc unapp ca I Read Dt Reads Cons Service Balance: 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 5530 0.00 0.00 09-28-98 BIL 7.00 EXTRA GARBAG 7.00 l N/A 0 0 09-15-98 BIL 7.00 EXTRA GARBAG 7.00 N/A 0 0 Total Balance Due: 1,350.97 1,034.56 55.88 22.20 102.40 80.63 55.30 0.00 0.00 • I CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al#: r Submitting Data: For Agenda of: September 11, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/Mayor's Office Staff Contact Kathy Keolker, Mayor Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Parks Commission Appointments: Ordinance Mr. Al Dieckman and Mr. Larry Reymann Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Community Services Applications Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to Community Services Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated iiiiimo Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Keolker appoints the following to the Parks Commission: Mr. Al Dieckman, 1837 NE 29th Court, Renton, WA 98056; for a term expiring on June 1, 2010 (position previously held by Ralph Evans) Mr. Larry Reymann, 1313 N. 38th Street, Renton, WA 98056; for a term expiring on June 1, 2008 (position previously held by Marjorie Richter) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm Mayor Keolker's appointments of Mr. Al Dieckman and Mr. Larry Reymann to the Parks Commission. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh m • CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE *III If you are interested in participating in local government by membership on any of the following City boards, commissions,or committees,please complete this application and return it to: Office of the Mayor City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 • Check the boards/commissions/committees in which you are interested: ❑ AIRPORT ADVISORY COQ* {� PLANNING COMMISSION= LI CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION* ❑ ADVISORY COMMISSION ON DIVERSITY UHOUSING AUTHORITY* U SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMI tTEE' LI HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE* ❑ SISTER CITY COMMITTEE-CUAUTLA ❑ LIBRARY BOARD L1 SISTER CITY COI IITTEE-NISHIWAKI ❑ MUNICIPAL ARTS COMMISSION* 0 TRANSIT ADVISORY BOARD Q PARKS COMMISSION* *Special membership requirements apply. Visit www.ci.renton.wa.us or call 425-430-6500 for details. Your application will be given every consideration as vacancies occur. . MR-1134.-S.0 NAME . 1-ew/12C.-dJOE £-- (2.e /11 71 DATE 7/4 o ' ADDRESS I31 ') MO 2Gjlfi ST- �L. t np 7 ,,/I 1D L .rlv7 WP� ZIT' S�- � � 1�IONE: DAY �i--- a"a-K'I''(l ( NIGHT -5 i.E- EMAIL Fu . J J L�_ Com, • RENTON RESIDENT? r:S IF S .SINCE WIZEN? . 1/70, ' CITY OF FORMER RESIDENCE D JF1L( &I,3J Wt.0 v .EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND//4457-a") 0 6,z,ti t, -(12 (41) q7? ti20,4,� /4442441 . l-1A KE .VN(V-� v tGUI , 3fro'i�(z) ilaGrZac 'c( M ��� �� Jit J. . n/OFIt a . ! ( . OCCUPATION EMPLOYER !.9-7 t t t4. IN�IC S, l S44'i 1 cT/iQ uct, OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND n162-11 1 -"4.6401--/, - o t •l-) Cat r/'• •i?D /q74- • q7,- ,.At.,.J .P" t.sla(;IL..IV - S ca3 AlSatlo2 ‘1AMMi`.g. t - IPJ ;1 NE4- COMnM�U,NII'TY A ( r/dnbs texTice groups,etc.) r Pit/ -t(1`1."i .R - 4. cctb --`�1'r4ia.(4�rl r 24-#E✓�1�40.994 / NJ.� . to.S:,+a'�v t'/Z► �4/t' sc.i. .. . :. : . Ia -14 I A.t .. ...,- - G:- _ (. rl... 0 .f -Awl_ Q.► .....Su % - "0 as' -. REASON FOR APPLYING FOR THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE l/J11 t-) IV Mal • ilartvtilra9 lb 507Poil t'-•tAt) - Ro a SA-sJ5 ?t - 5-1- 1 /IL SoJizc • ( ATTEND DAY MEETINGS? F-5 CAN ATTEND NIGH7T MEETINGS? las Nome ! E----• Applications'will be kept on file fur one year.If you have�eskans about ecn ng on a board,// commission,or conaafttee,please feel free to contact the Mayor's Office at 4254304500. aao�as . — CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE f fr `you are interested in participating in local government by membership on any of the following City boards,commissions or .;ommittees please complete this application and return it to: RECEIVE D'S Office of the Mayor City of Renton MAR 16 2006 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 MAYORS OFFICE a lre'boa' r 'b#i�Z 'x r`YrP r r v ' w�.�Y- 'Jt re ed: . !'-',1 _ H--- �_ ABORT ''t cel , f z YE iri C i u. ,:::,-. 7,/� P tR i s t Cit€(`"- t)� *7- ' je C L, . t ,+ k..rrem i€E4t,Ni 4i.'? x `4 Z RENTON € t; olg\ t,1)EfC 1(' % # f V �� °"a: `` 1iC)U� "r�.�', [(c::,1,-,!.f yy t7:',4*.t <^&' �+ S O F E - F " G Y y £ t t„, ' �.. ,� 3 '; S �] .. �F�,. € �f Ef �` , t'�At�' €roe 4,x1`5 t,ii s,� 4 "-4 a2' .Q.) t t t t r'j a:x.' S 1 r ( �t1 4t t r 'e �t„Lr, . 1Qt °e 1 �'<s s3 � � r " r �� ' ts'� � t`f ��e'�Ef0 k C [ " .:Y t'ti. v -, >''; iy5 ' k .t4 4 ,4 ,' 4�4: -[1-Y gig'.. ; ,,` ,t`Ei+fir 1,rC `. IL,A` ,Y' ''i \#-„. - Ci^.• U �l=.F e r 4 �" y. F C f rC x� s t 4,4o ir: ��� .fi P �� �` ,�_. ,� '',V,,, �; *Special membership requirements apply. Visit www.ci.renton.wa.us or call 425-430-6500 for details. Your application will be given every consideration as vacancies occur. MR.❑ MS. ❑NAME Al Dieckman DATE 3/15/06 ADDRESS 1837 NE 29th Ct Renton,Wa ZIP CODE 98056 PHONE- DAY 425.221.3952 NIGHT 425.226.8065 EMAIL: dawgs49 a@Comcast.com RENTON RESIDENT? Yes IF SO,SINCE WHEN? 1949 iTY OF FORMER RESIDENCE N.A. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND High School OCCUPATION: Retired EMPLOYER: City of Renton—Parks Dept OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: 32 yrsparks maintenance, 14 yrs as maintenance worker, 12 yrs as maintenance supervisor,6 yrs parks manager,4 yrs part-time maintenance for Kent Parks COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES(organizations/clubs/service groups,etc.)21 club,Hazen HS booster club,Maplewood Men's club REASON FOR APPLYING FOR THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE:I have attended park board meetings regularly for past 16 yrs,know current members and feel I would be an asset to this board,I am aware of current park issues,I have been involve in parks operations and would like to give back to the city the knowledge I have obtained,I understand and have worked on the budget process and the city's missions statements t.' AN A'1 TEND DAY MEETINGS? Yes CAN ATTEND NIGHT MEETINGS? Yes I Applications will be kept on file for one year.If you have questions about serving on a board, conunission,or committee,please feel free to contact the mayor's office at 425-430-6500. ce: n h(a CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL ala: '` L. Submitting Data: For Agenda of: September 18, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/Mayor's Office Staff Contact Kathy Keolker, Mayor Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Parks Commission Reappointments: Ordinance Ms. Cynthia Burns and Mr. Michael O'Donin Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Keolker reappoints the following to the Parks Commission for a four-year term, expiring on October 1, 2010: Ms. Cynthia Burns,2007 NE 12th St, Renton, WA 98056 Mr. Michael O'Donin,423 Pelly Avenue N, Renton, WA 98055 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm Mayor Keolker's reappointments of Ms. Cynthia Burns and Mr. Michael O'Donin to the Parks Commission. • Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI N: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS September 11, 2006 Staff Contact Marty Wine, Asst. CAO (x6526) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. City of Renton Initiative Measure Concerning Fireworks Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Resolution Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Council minutes of 4/3/06 and 4/10/06 MRSC Initiative and Referendum Guide, p. 13-14 Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $80,000 (2007) Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: In November, 2006, proponents of the fireworks initiative submitted a petition to lift the City's fireworks ban, certified by King County Records & Elections as sufficient in March, 2006. On April 10, 2006, Council approved the petition and called for election by motion on the consent agenda. The City Clerk notified the legal representative for proponents of Council action. In July, the City Attorney had the City Clerk route the draft ballot title to the proponents, Renton Fire Department, and King County. On August 29, initiative proponents alerted the City Clerk that the initiative was not listed in the voters'pamphlet. In order to be placed on the September 19, 2006 primary election ballot, Renton should have filed the ballot title resolution with King County within 45 days of that election(August 4). The City has never had the responsibility to place an initiative on the ballot for a third party. Despite careful reading of the law and process, an internal miscommunication occurred about the action to file the ballot title and request the election of King County. Renton failed to file the ballot title with King County in time for the primary election. The City Clerk and City Attorney regret this error. However, it is still possible to place the initiative on the November general election ballot. The effective date, if approved, would be upon King County's certification of election results. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a resolution transmitting the fireworks initiative ballot title to King County and requesting a special election on November 7, 2006. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh `sY O� ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND 4=1 , LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 4\r-c0 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members, Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Marty Wine, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer STAFF CONTACT: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk SUBJECT: Fireworks Initiative: Timeline, Status and Next Steps ISSUE: Should the City Council request that King County call a special municipal election to consider revoking the City's ban on fireworks, to coincide with the November 7, 2006 general election, and place Proposition 1 before the qualified electors of the City of Renton? RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council approve a resolution calling for King County to hold a special municipal election, and transmitting the ballot title to the King County Division of Records and Elections for placement on the general election ballot. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: In November 2005, the proponents of the fireworks initiative submitted a petition to lift the City's fireworks ban. The petition was certified by King County Records & Elections as sufficient in March 2006. On April 10, 2006, Council approved placing the proposed fireworks ordinance on the election ballot. The next day, the City Clerk notified the legal representative for the proponents of Council action. In June, the City Attorney prepared a proposed initiative ballot title as required by RCW 29A.36.071, and sent a copy to the City Clerk for routing and review by the initiative proponents, King County Records and Elections, and the Renton Fire Department. On July 5, 2006, the City Attorney routed a copy of the revised ballot title to the City Clerk. The City Clerk believed the City Attorney was filing the ballot title with King County, iolor however that was not the case. c:\docume-1\mwine\locals 1\temp\mxlibdir\fireworks_issuepaper.doc wimmear Council President Randy Conran Page 2 of 3 September 11,2006 On August 29, 2006, initiative proponents alerted the City Clerk that the initiative was not listed in the voters' pamphlet. In order to be placed on the September 19, 2006 primary election ballot, Renton should have filed the ballot title by resolution with King County 45 days or more prior to the election (August 4). The City of Renton has never had the responsibility to place an initiative on the ballot for a third party. Despite our careful reading of the law and process, an internal miscommunication occurred about the action to file the ballot title and request the election of King County. Renton failed to file the ballot title resolution with King County in time for the primary due to our internal miscommunication. The Assistant CAO, City Clerk and City Attorney sincerely regret this error. However, it is still possible to place the initiative on the general election ballot in November. The effective date of the initiative, if approved, would be upon certification of election results by King County. A resolution requesting King County place the issue on the ballot is now needed. King County requires that the ballot title prepared by the City Attorney be adopted by Council by resolution that calls for the special election, and then that resolution would be filed with the County in order to place it on the ballot. RCW 29A.04.330(2) indicates that the election must be called for by resolution. The initiative process guide prepared by MRSC and followed by the City Clerk made no mention of these resolution requirements. In consultation with the Municipal Research Services Center (MRSC) and King County Records and Elections, the City Clerk researched the appropriate mechanism to request an election. There is no state law that indicates the City must adopt legislation to approve an initiative ballot title. Since this is a citizen initiative and not a city proposal, the only legal requirement seems to be for the City to file the ballot title. Then, the County has certain obligations they must follow in order to present the ballot title to the proponents for approval and place it on the ballot. The City Clerk and City Attorney believe that because the City of Renton is not the proponent, the only action needed is a resolution reflecting Council's motion approving a special election approved in April. (If it were a City proposal, such as for lid lift or a bond issue, then an ordinance calling for special election and transmitting the ballot title would be appropriate.) The City Clerk has confirmed with King County Records and Elections that a resolution reflecting Council approval of the initiative for the ballot and transmitting the ballot title is required and sufficient to place the measure on the ballot. The City must now meet a filing deadline of September 22 with King County to place the initiative on the November 7 ballot. The approval of this resolution will set the following steps in motion: • The city clerk must cause the measure that will be submitted to the voters at an election to be published at least once in the daily newspaper in the city between *miti c:\docume--1\mwine\localsl\temp\mxlibdir\fireworks_issue paper.doc Council President Randy Corman Page 3 of 3 September 1 1,2006 %Inv five and twenty days before the election. This would occur between October 18 and November 2. • The city legislative authority is responsible for specifically requesting inclusion of the measure in the voters' pamphlet by resolution or ordinance and that step is included in the proposed resolution. The King County Records and Elections Voters Pamphlet Guidelines for Ballot Measures states that the voters' pamphlet statement must be requested "by the governing authority of the jurisdiction by ordinance or resolution and fully paid for by the jurisdiction." The voters' pamphlet statement must be submitted to the Elections Office no later than forty- five days prior to the election date. • Once the ballot title is filed, the County will notify the proponents of the exact language of the ballot title and a 10-day window exists for appeal. • The election is to be held not 45 days after the certificate of sufficiency is received by the council. The City's election costs will be incurred in 2006 but billed and paid in 2007. The Administration will propose $82,500 to cover these election costs in the 2007 budget. RCW 29A.04.410 states that each jurisdiction is liable for its proportionate share of the costs when held in conjunction with other elections, and the City Clerk has confirmed this estimated cost with King County Records and Elections. The Administration's recommendation in April was to assure that voters fully understand low the intention of the ordinance, so that they may accurately and confidently vote their preference. As a separate action and issue, the City Council is permitted to express its position on the ballot measure consistent with RCW 42.17.130 and Public Disclosure Commission guidelines, which state that local elected legislative bodies "may collectively vote to support or oppose a ballot measure at a properly noticed public meeting, where opponents of the measure are given an equal opportunity to express views." CONCLUSION: The purpose of this resolution is to connect the steps of 1) Council's earlier approval to hold a special election related to the fireworks initiative; and 2) the transmittal of the ballot title to King County Records and Elections. The action would cause King County place the issue on the November 7, 2006 general election ballot, and the City of Renton to publish the text of the initiative in advance of the election, and coordinate the submittal of voters' pamphlet statements to King County. c:\docume--1\mwine\locals1\temp\mxlibdir\fireworks_issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THAT THE KING COUNTY DIVISION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS CALL A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, TO COINCIDE WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7 , 2006, AND PLACE PROPOSITION NO. 1 BEFORE 1'HE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF RENTON ON THE NOVEMBER 7, 2006, BALLOT. WHEREAS, proponents submitted to the office of the City Clerk an initiative petition to lift the fireworks ban within the City of Renton, and adopt an ordinance establishing the times and conditions under which fireworks could be sold and used; and WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded the petition to the King County Division of Records and Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2006, the King County Division of Records and Elections certified that the petition was insufficient; and WHEREAS, on February 23, 2006, proponents filed an amendment to the petition containing additional signatures; and WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded this amended petition to the King County Division of Records and Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2006, the King County Division of Records and Elections certified that the initiative petitions bore sufficient valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the initiative was not adopted by the Renton City Council, and pursuant to 841400, law, must be submitted to the voters of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The City of Renton requests, in the form of this Resolution, that King County call a special municipal election to coincide with the November 7, 2006, general election, and place Proposition 1 before the qualified electors of the City of Renton in the November 7, 2006, ballot. SECTION III. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place Proposition 1 before the voters on the November 7, 2006, election. SECTION W. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition 1. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to King County Division of Records and Elections: CITY OF RENTON INITIATIVE MEASURE CONCERNING FIREWORKS This measure would revoke the City of Renton's ban on the sale and discharge of all fireworks within the city, except for publicly sponsored displays and would allow for the sale and discharge of consumer fireworks on certain days within certain hours, to commemorate Independence Day and the New Year, and would set regulations for the sale and discharge of fireworks and penalties for violations. Should this measure be enacted into law? ❑ Yes ❑ No �wr•' 2 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION V. The Mayor is authorized and directed to take those actions NftistO necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 1 in the November, 2006, voter's pamphlet. SECTION VI. Actions taken prior to adoption of this resolution that are consistent with it are hereby ratified and confirmed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. 440 Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1208:9/5/06:ma Nod 3 'avv p i� ClTY OF RENTON I p-c IMO NOV 0 1 2005 WARNING RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE '.y,�VERY PERSON WHO SIGNS THIS PETITION WITH ANY OTHER THAN HIS OR HER —1'RUE NAME,OR WHO KNOWINGLY SIGNS MORE THAN ONE OF THESE PETITIONS, OR SIGNS A PETITION SEEKING AN ELECTION WHEN HE OR SHE IS NOT A LEGAL VOTER,OR SIGNS A PETITION WHEN HE OR SHE IS OTHERWISE NOT QUALIFIED TO SIGN,OR WHO MAKES HEREIN ANY FALSE STATEMENT,SHALL BE GUILTY OF A MISDEMEANOR. INITIATIVE PETITION FOR SUBMISSION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON: We, the undersigned registered voters of the City of Renton, State of Washington,propose the enactment as an ordinance of the City of Renton the following measure known as the Fireworks Control Ordinance, a full, true and correct copy of which is included herein.The Fireworks Control Ordinance concerns the legal use of State of Washington defined consumer fireworks by residents of the City of Renton. This measure repeals City of Renton Ordinance Number 5088 and enacts provisions authorizing residents of the City of Renton to purchase,possess and use safely and responsibly State of Washington consumer fireworks to celebrate the Fourth of July, in honor of the anniversary of the birth of our country, and to celebrate New Year's Eve. We petition to Council to enact said measure as an ordinance; and, if not enacted within forty- five(45)days from the time of receipt thereof by the City Council, then to be submitted to the qualified electors of the City of Renton for approval or rejection at the next regular or special election in accordance with RCW 35.17.260 and Section 1-2-2 of the Renton Municipal Code; and each of us for himself or herself says: I HAVE PERSONALLY SIGNED THIS PETITION; I AM A REGISTERED VOTER OF THE CITY OF RENTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND MY RESIDENCE ADDRESS IS CORRECTLY STATED. ..;n5ture Printed Name Address Dateli -t7e 2. '�_ Ceti, C :6 1 -'-' ,1 --)A1" ` {.c.� . C. ) 3• i 4.1 t`�i.� 1 t, /� Ali" � � �����. pc:, / r e l . 7--- -i.) 5. r i 6. 1 „� /. . . .. ' S ' ' t 7 -.7 OS- 7. V y, x© yl / (- 6 L •S ,.d�„ ) 9 111a/cc_ L. l/,/ 15 / �/ --r;',i rr-r,Ayr. hc-� -i", - i f J/ te.A.co-e— *A.4_46, 77Lt-ei--- ek., i‘-g" S /a /10, ( i c:3--vt../ t--e'5 c-----L-i N A N c d A ) V if. ',Lev( 4,-e_ 74712. ' t t 2i�� '1Ci`l V 13. a .,G',�-4,C r.w.��„4 . ter,;`,�.---�: -7/,.. 'c'� ;5 71---i.,<‘//,'.4-5 /44..f i/J�,,k.� I 6bii(l) ;iSS - J7, s c,..._,� �, A ern C t�16�, „" te :___-/..„, _ � r?�r <: ; /'9/i. i./ Chi '` g 19. " 20. CO ANCE KS section Section 1:Renton Ordinance Number 5088 and everyfREWOf the RentoniMROpaORDe enac ed thereby are completely repealed, Section 2: The following is hereby enacted to be codified as a part of the Renton Municipal Code: FIREWORKS Sections: 1 Definitions. 2 Acts prohibited without a permit. 3 Application for permit. L , 4 Investigation,report on permit application. %11I 5 Fire chief may grant or deny permit—Conditions. 6 License required prior to issuance of permit. 7 Public display permit—Granted for exclusive purpose—Nontransferable. 8 Supervision of public displays. 9 Permit authorizes activities of sellers, representatives and employees. 10 Dates and times consumer fireworks may be sold or discharged. 11 Sales of consumer fireworks. 12 Sales locations. 13 Standards for fireworks locations. 14 Fire nuisance where fireworks kept prohibited. 15 Approved storage facilities required. 16 Unlawful possession. 17 Sale of fireworks to persons under 16 years of age prohibited. 18 Sales or transfers of display fireworks. 19 Manufacture or sale of fireworks for out-of-state shipment. 20 Special effects for entertainment media. 21 Nonprohibited acts—Signal purposes,forest protection. 22 Revocation or suspension of permit. 23 Reckless discharge or use prohibited. 24 Discharge of fireworks by person under 16 years of age. 25 Enforcement. 26 Penalties for violation. 27 Violation a separate,continuing offense. 28 Construction 28 Severability. Section 1.Definitions. Unless the context in which they are used otherwise requires,the following definitions shall govern the construction of the terms found in this chapter: A. "Fireworks"means any composition or device designed to produce a visible or audible effect by combustion, deflagration or detonation,and which meets the definition of agricultural and wildlife fireworks,articles pyrotechnic,special effects,consumer fireworks or display fireworks. B. "Display fireworks"means large fireworks designed primarily to produce visible or audible effects by combustion, deflagration,or detonation and includes,but is not limited to,salutes containing more than two grains(130 milligrams)of explosive materials,aerial shells containing more than 40 grams of pyrotechnic compositions,and other display pieces which exceed the limits of explosive materials for classification as"consumer fireworks"and are classified as fireworks UN0333, UN0334,or UN0335 by the United States Department of Transportation at 49 C.F.R.Section 172.101 as of the effective date of this ordinance,and including fused setpieces containing components which exceed 50 milligrams of salute powder. C. "Consumer fireworks"means any small firework device designed to produce visible effects by combustion and which must comply with the construction,chemical composition,and labeling regulations of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission,as set forth in 16 C.F.R.Parts 1500 and 1507 and including some small devices designed to produce audible effects,such as whistling devices,ground devices containing 50 milligrams or less of explosive materials,and aerial devices containing 130 milligrams or less of explosive materials and classified as fireworks UN0336 by the United States Department of Transportation at 490 C.F.R. Section 172.101 as of the effective date of this ordinance,and not including fused setpieces containing components which together exceed 50 milligrams of salute powder. D. "Agricultural and wildlife fireworks"includes fireworks devices distributed to farmers, ranchers,and growers through a wildlife management program administered by the United States Department of the Interior or an equivalent state or local governmental agency. E."Articles pyrotechnic"means pyrotechnic devices for professional use similar to consumer fireworks in chemical composition and construction but not intended for consumer use which meet the weight limits for consumer fireworks but which are not labeled as such and which are classified as UN0431 or UN0432 by the United State Department of Transportation at 49 C.F.R.Section 172.101 as of the effective date of this ordinance. F."Flame effects"means the detonation,deflagration, or ignition of flammable gases,liquids,or special materials to produce a thermal,physical,visual,or audible effect before the public,invitees,or licensees,regardless of whether or not there an admission fee is charged. G."Special effects"means any combination of chemical elements or chemical compounds capable of burning independently of the oxygen in the atmosphere,and designed and intended to produce an audible,visual, mechanical,or thermal effect as an integral part of a motion picture,radio,television,theatrical,or opera production,or live entertainment. H."Public display of fireworks"means an entertainment feature where the public is or could be admitted or permitted to view the display or discharge of articles pyrotechnic,special effects or display fireworks. I."Fire nuisance"means any thing or any act which increases,or may cause an increase of,the hazard or menace of fire to a greater degree than customarily recognized as normal by persons in the public service of preventing,suppressing,or extinguishing fire;or which may obstruct,delay,or hinder,or may become the cause of any obstruction,delay or the hindrance,to the prevention of or extinguishment of fire. J."License"means a nontransferable formal authorization which the chief of the Washington State Patrol,through the director of fire protection, is authorized to issue under Chapter 70.77 RCW to engage in the act specifically designated therein. K."Licensee"means any person issued a fireworks license in conformance with Chapter 70.77 RCW. L."Permit"means the official authorization granted by the city for the purpose of doing any act which is reaulatari Chapter 70.77 RCW. M."Permittee"means any person issu 3 fireworks permit in conformance with CI .er 70.77 RCW. N."Person"includes any individual,firr .,partnership,joint venture,association,concern,corporation, estate,trust, • business trust, receiver,syndicate, or any other group or combination acting as a unit. 0."Manufacturer"includes any person who manufactures, makes,constructs,fabricates,or produces any fireworks article or device but does not include persons who assemble or fabricate sets or mechanical pieces in public displays of fireworks or persons who assemble consumer fireworks items or sets of packages containing consumer fireworks items. P.'Wholesaler"includes any person who sells fireworks to a retailer or any other person for resale and any person who P articles pyrotechnic,special effects or display fireworks to public display permittees. ..,,,,,,,,vvatailer"includes any person who,at a fixed location or place of business,offers for sale,sells,or exchanges for caTf�ideration consumer fireworks to a consumer or user. R."Pyrotechnic operator"includes any individual who by experience and training has demonstrated the required skill and ability for safely setting up and discharging articles pyrotechnic,special effects or display fireworks. S."Fire chief"means the chief administrative officer of the fire department and/or his designee who shall be the local fire official for purposes of Chapter 70.77 RCW. T."Permanent storage"means storage of display fireworks at any time and/or storage of consumer fireworks at any time other than the periods allowed under this code and which shall be in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 70.77 RCW. U."Temporary storage"means the storage of consumer fireworks during the periods allowed Chapter 70.77 RCW. W."Retail fireworks stand"means a tent or other temporary structure made of wood, metal or other material,which meets the requirements of WAC 212-17 and which is used for the retail sale of consumer fireworks. Section 2. Acts prohibited without a permit. No person shall do any of the following acts in the City of Renton without having first obtained and having in full force and effect a valid permit issued by the City of Renton to do so: A. Manufacture, import,possess or sell any fireworks,including agricultural and wildlife fireworks,at wholesale or retail for any use;provided, however, no permit is required for the possession or use of consumer fireworks lawfully purchased at retail; B. Discharge display fireworks at any place; C. Make a public display of fireworks;or D. Transport fireworks,except as a licensee or as a public carrier delivering to a licensee or permittee and except the transport of consumer fireworks lawfully purchased at retail Section 3.Application for permit. A. Any person desiring to do any act set forth in Section 2 shall first make written application for a permit to the fire chief. The application for a permit shall be signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative. If the application is made by a partnership, it shall be signed by each partner of the partnership or by the partnership's authorized representative. If the application is made by a corporation, it shall be signed by an officer of the corporation and bear the seal of the corporation or by the corporation's authorized representative. The application shall be in such form as the fire chief shall require and shall include,at a minimum,the following information: 1. The true name,address and telephone number of the applicant and for any retail operation the person in charge and rr �sible; tatement by the applicant that he or she is over the age of 18 years; 3. valid and current license issued by the chief of the Washington State Patrol,through the director of fire protection, pursuant to Chapter 70.77 RCW authorizing the applicant thereto to engage in the requested activity; 4. The proposed location at which the applicant intends to perform the act for which the permit is sought,and,for retail sales,a diagram showing the proposed site plan of the retail consumer fireworks stand location which includes distances from property lines,distances from structures,distances from other fireworks stands and vehicular traffic routes. B. All applications for permits pursuant to this chapter shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable permit fee of$100.00. This fee shall cover all needed permits,licenses and authorizations from application to and through processing, issuance and inspections and all other costs, if any,of any kind, including business license fees.The applicant shall post a$500.00 cash bond,conditioned upon the prompt removal of the temporary stand and the clearing up of all debris from the site by the tenth day of July of each year for sales commencing on the twenty-eighth day of June,or the tenth day of January of the subsequent year for sales commencing on the twenty-seventh day of December. Failure to do so shall cause the bond to be forfeited to the City of Renton. All applications for permits for a pubic display shall be accompanied by a certificate of insurance coverage evidencing the carrying of a comprehensive general liability insurance policy with a minimum coverage of$500,000 and$2,000,000 for bodily injury liability for each person and event, respectively,and not less than$500,000 for property damage liability for each event. Such general liability policy shall name the city as an additional named insured, must be in full force and effect for the duration of the permit,and shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation of the policy without 30 days' written notice to the City of Renton. D. Applications for public display of fireworks shall be made in writing at least 10 days in advance of the proposed display.All applications shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable permit fee of$500.00.The applicant shall post a $500.00 cash bond,conditioned upon the prompt removal of all debris from the site within 24 hours of such display. Failure to do so shall cause the bond to be forfeited to the City of Renton. E. Applications for retail sale of consumer fireworks shall be made annually on or after the first day of January of the year for which the permit is issued and the filing period shall close on the thirty-first day of May of such year. Section 4.Investigation, report on permit application. The fire chief shall make an investigation and prepare a report of his findings and conclusions for or against the issuance of the permit,together with his reasons therefor. In the case of an application for a permit for a public display of fireworks, the fire chief shall,in addition to any other investigation, make an investigation as to whether such display as proposed will be of such a character and will be so located that it may be hazardous to property or dangerous to any person, consistent with the requirements of RCW 70.77. Se 5.Fire chief may grant or deny permit—Conditions. Th +chief shall have the power to grant any application for a permit or to deny any application for a permit if the permit would not be in conformance with Chapter 70.77 RCW. Section 6.License required prior to issuance of permit. No permit shall be issued unless the person applying therefor shall first have obtained and have in full force and effect a valid license issued by the chief of the Washington State Patrol,through the director of fire protection,pursuant to Chapter 70.77 RCW,to do the particular act or acts for which the permit is sought. Section 7.Public display permit—Granted for exclusive purpose—Nontransferable. If a permit for the public display of fireworks is granted,the sale.possession and uca of fire a n.L� ..� _..L,:_ ,._ Section 8.Supervision of public di:. ys. Every public display of fireworks shall be handled or supervised by a pyrotechnic operator licensed by the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Chapter 70.77 RCW. Section 9. Permit authorizes activities of sellers,representatives and employees. The authorization to engage in the particular act or acts as conferred by a permit to a person shall extend to sellers, authorized representatives,and employees of such person. Section 10. Dates and times consumer fireworks may be sold or discharged. A. Consumer fireworks may be sold,offered for sale,or exposed for sale within the city from 12:00 noon until 11:00 p.m. on the twenty-eighth day of June,from 9:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m.on each day from the twenty-nineth day of June until the fourth day of July,and from 9:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m.on the fifth day of July and from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m.on each day from the twenty-seventh day of December until the thirty-first day of December. B. A person may ignite or discharge consumer fireworks within the city at any time from 12:00 noon until 11:00 p.m.on the twenty-eighth day of June,2006,from 9:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m.on each day from the twenty-nineth day of June, 2006, until the third day of July,2006,from 12:00 noon until 12:00 midnight on the fourth day of July,2006,from 12:00 noon until 11:00 p.m.on the fifth day of July,2006,and from 6:00 p.m.on the thirty-first day of December,2006, until 1:00 a.m. on the first day of January,2007,and at any time in 2007 and every year thereafter from 12:00 noon until 11:00 p.m. on the third day of July,from 12:00 noon until 12:00 midnight on the fourth day of July,from 12:00 noon until 11:00 p.m. on the fifth day of July, and from 6:00 p.m.on the thirty-first day of December until 1:00 a.m.on the first day of January of the subsequent year. C. No person without a permit shall discharge any consumer fireworks upon any city or publicly owned parks or school grounds. D. The limitations set out in subsections A and B of this section shall not apply in the following cases: 1. Public displays as authorized by a state license pursuant to RCW 70.77.260(2)and a city permit pursuant to this ordinance; 2. Use for religious or specific purposes pursuant to RCW 70.77.311;and 3. Agricultural and wildlife fireworks as authorized by RCW 70.77.311. E. Except as herein provided,it is unlawful for any person to possess,store,offer for sale,sell at retail, use,explode,fire, ignite,or discharge any fireworks in the city. Section 11.Sales of consumer fireworks. No person shall sell consumer fireworks to a consumer or user thereof other than at a fixed place of business of a retailer for which a license and permit have been issued. Section 12.Sales locations. All sales of consumer fireworks shall be from temporary stands,which shall not be erected prior to the twenty-second day of June of any year for retail consumer fireworks sales beginning on the twenty-eighth day of June and which shall be removed not later than the tenth day of July of the same year or which shall not be erected prior to the twenty-second day of December of any year for retail consumer fireworks sales beginning on the twenty-seventh day of December and which shall be removed not later than the tenth day of January of the subsequent year or from permanent buildings. Section 13.Standards for fireworks locations. A.The temporary fireworks stands or permanent buildings of all those persons engaging in the retail sale of consumer fireworks shall comply with all provisions of Part V of WAC 212-17. B. Temporary fireworks stand or permanent building shall be permitted where retail operations are permitted by the zoning code. Section 14.Fire nuisance where fireworks kept prohibited. No person shall allow any combustibles to accumulate in any premises where any fireworks are sold or stored or allow a fire nuisance to exist on such premises. Section 15.Approved storage facilities required. It is unlawful for any person to store temporarily stocks of fireworks except in such places as approved Unsold stocks of consumer fireworks remaining after the authorized retail sales period from 12:00 noonbonthe twenty-eighth day of June until 9:00 p.m.on the fifth day of July shall be stored in a location approved by the fire returned on or before the tenth day of July of the same year to a magazine or permanent storage p acefaorpprovledbe by the fire chief or to a place approved by the chief of the Washington State Patrol,through the director of fire protection. Unsold stocks of consumer fireworks remaining after the authorized retail sale period from 12:00 noon on to twenty-seventh day of December until 11:00 p.m.on the thirty-first day of December of the same year shall be stored in a location approved by the fire chief or shall be returned on or before the tenth day of January of the subsequent year to the approved permanent storage facilities of a licensed fireworks wholesaler,to a magazine or permanent storage place approved by the fire chief or to a place approved by the chief of the Washington State Patrol,through the director of fire protection. Upon receiving a written application for temporary storage,the fire chief shall investigate whether the character and location of the temporary storage as proposed meets the requirements of the zoning and building codes and WAC 212- 17. Based upon the investigation,the fire chief may grant or deny any application for temporary storage. Section 16.Unlawful possession. The possession of any class or kind of fireworks in violation of the provisions of this ordinance or Chapter 70.77 RCW is prohibited. Section 17.Sale of fireworks to persons under 16 years of age prohibited. It is unlawful to sell fireworks to any person under the age of 16 years.Sellers shall require proof of age by means of display of a driver's license or a photo identification card issued by any state,a United States military identification card,a valid passport issued by the United States or any government recognized by the United States,or any other valid identification with photo issued by any agency or department of the United States federal government.No other forms of identification shall be accepted. Section 18.Sales or transfers of display fireworks. No person shall sell or transfer any display fireworks to any person who is not a fireworks permittee as provided in this chapter. Section 19.Manufacture or sale of fireworks for out-of-state shipment. This ordinance does not prohibit any manufacturer,wholesaler,dealer,or jobber having a license issued by the chief of the Washington State Patrol,through the director of fire protection,and a permit secured under the provisions of this ordinance from manufacturing or selling any kind of fireworks for direct shipment out of this state. Section 20.Special effects for entertainment media. This ordinance does not prohibit the assembling,compounding,use and display of articles pyrotechnic,flame effects, special effects or display fireworks of whatever nature by any person engaged in the productions,theatricals or operas when such assembling,compounding, use and display is a necessary part of the production and such person possesses a valid permit issued by the city. - Section 21. Nonprohibited acts—Sir it purposes, forest protection. This ordinance does not prohibit the u;,_ of flares or fuses in connection with the operation of motor vehicles, railroads, or other modes of transportation for signal purposes or illumination or for use in forest protection activities. Section 22. Revocation or suspension of permit. A. Authority. The fire chief may at any time suspend or revoke any ie permittee or any of the permittee's representatives, agents or employees wed the permiunder thettee's knowledge hrovisions of this as :nance, if `osot. Violated any of the provisions of this ordinance; orth 2. Made any false statement or misrepresentation of fact in connection with obtaining the permit; or 3. Failed to obtain or has had suspended or revoked any license required by the state of Washington to engage in any act prohibited by Chapter 70.77 RCW or this ordinance to be done without a license; or 4. Has had any insurance coverage required by this ordinance cancelled, revoked or lapsed. B. Effective Date of Revocation. When the fire chief determines that there is cause for revoking or suspending any permit issued pursuant to this ordinance, the fire chief shall notify the person holding such permit. The notice shall specify the grounds for the suspension or revocation of the permit. The suspension or revocation shall become effective immediately upon receipt of the notice of the permittee unless the permittee gives written notice to the City Clerk or his or her designee within forty-eight hours of his or her intent to appeal the revocation or suspension and then becomes effective only if the revocation or suspension is affirmed by the City Council C. Appeal. The decision of the fire chief with respect to the revocation or suspension of any permit issued under this ordinance shall be final unless a timely written notice of appeal is filed as specified in subsection B of this section. Any permittee whose permit is suspended or revoked may appeal the decision of the fire chief to the City Council. The City Council shall consider the appeal at a regular or special council meeting whichever is necessary. This council meeting shall be held no later than forty-eight hours after the City Clerk or his or her designee receives the written notice of appealA permittee may at any time appeal a revocation or suspension to King County Superior Court. Section 23. Reckless discharge or use prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to discharge or to use fireworks in a reckless manner which creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person or damage to the property of another. Section 24. Discharge of fireworks by person under 16 years of age. It is unlawful for any person under the age of 16 to discharge fireworks except under the direct supervision of a competent adult. Section 25. Enforcement. The police chief, or his or her designee, is authorized to enforce provisions of this ordinance and Chapter 70.77 RCW that ---rtain to the possession and use of fireworks in the City of Renton. The fire chief, or his or her designee, is authorized to force provisions of this ordinance relating to the permitting of public display of fireworks and the retail sale of consumer Tlreworks. He or she may revoke or suspend any permit issued pursuant to this ordinance upon any failure or refusal of the permittee to comply any provisions of this ordinance or Chapter 70.77 RCW. Section 26. Penalties for violation. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall, upon a finding by a court of competent jurisdiction that such violation was committed, be subject to imposition of a fine and/or imprisonment as follows: A. A misdemeanor for unlawful possession of fireworks weighing less than one pound, exclusive of external packaging. B. A gross misdemeanor for unlawful possession of fireworks weighing one pound or more, exclusive of external packaging. C. A gross misdemeanor for violation of the prohibition upon use or discharge of fireworks in a reckless manner. D. A gross misdemeanor for violation of the restrictions upon the sale of fireworks set forth in this ordinance. E. A misdemeanor for any other violation of the provisions of this ordinance. Section 27. Violation a separate, continuing offense. A person commits a separate offense for each day during which he or she commits, continues, or permits a violation. Section 28. Construction. This ordinance shall be construed consistent with the provisions of Chapter 70.77 RCW. Section 29. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected. 8 April 3,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 95 • Citizen Comment: Lansciardi - Anthony James Lansciardi, 1524 Jefferson Ave. NE, Renton,98056, stated that Highlands Sub-Area Plan his landlord owns two properties in the Highlands redevelopment area. He pointed out that the subject housing proposed to be replaced represents a NIS historic period of time. Mr. Lansciardi noted that the houses are well built,and have endured over time. Citizen Comment: Lewis - Bonnie Lewis, 1520 Harrington Ave. NE,Renton, 98056, stated that she is not Highlands Sub-Area Plan a slum landlord, and she depends on the rent she receives from her duplex as part of her income. She reported that she lives across the street from McKnight Middle School, which is the source of the trash that ends up in her yard. Ms. Lewis indicated that she tries to make a major improvement to her property each year. She expressed her displeasure that her house is threatened due to the Highlands redevelopment effort. Citizen Comment: Boyd- Donovan Boyd, 2901 NE 8th Pl., Renton, 98056, expressed concern regarding Highlands Sub-Area Plan the Highlands redevelopment, saying that during the initial discussions with developers, he had heard that developers were not interested unless there was an assemblage of properties. Mr. Boyd stressed that he does not want to move, as he is happy with his home and it is affordable. He requested that citizens, especially the affected property owners, be provided regular updates about the plan to prevent miscommunication. In response to Mr. Boyd's comment that some property owners reported they did not receive notice of the open house last November, Mayor Keolker stated that all affected property owners that were on record with King County at the time of the meeting were notified. Economic Development Administrator Pietsch clarified that as a regular course of action,the City mails notices about land use actions to all affected property owners, and property owners within err 300 feet of the affected boundaries. Discussion ensued regarding communications with citizens and the literature handed out at the Council meeting by audience member Inez Petersen. Council President Corman reviewed the Option A and Option B referred to in Ms. Petersen's literature, saying that Option A is unrecognizable. He stated for the record that he is in agreement with this Option B, and noted that it does not seem to align at all with the Option A and B that was discussed at the Council workshop. ADDED ITEM Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes reported receipt of an initiative petition Public Safety: Citizen and proposed ordinance entitled "Fireworks Control Ordinance." The proposed lniti ly ,Fireworks ordinance repeals Ordinance 5088, and enacts provisions regarding the Ordinance possession, sale, and discharge of fireworks in Renton. She explained that if an ordinance initiated by the initiative process is enacted by Council,or voted upon by the people, it cannot be changed in any way by Council short of another special or general election. Ms. Fontes reviewed the proposed ordinance, noting typographical errors, inconsistencies, contradictions, and enforcement problems. Continuing,Ms. Fontes stated that the City's options are to 1)Adopt the ordinance as is; or 2)Put it on the ballot. Council has 20 days from tonight to make a decision. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington pointed out that the proposed ordinance reverses the City's current ordinance, which prohibits the discharge of fireworks in Renton except as part of a special event. The proposed ordinance allows for a longer firework season and more types of firework devices than the City allowed before the ban. April 3,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 96 In response to inquiries, Ms. Fontes explained that the City of SeaTac has taken i the position that the proposed ordinance title is insufficient,and is currently I involved in litigation. She noted that if the City does not choose either option, involvement in litigation may result. Ms. Fontes stated that the City can offer E alternative pieces of legislation on the ballot, thereby allowing the voters a choice. She assured that the title of the proposed ordinance does not become the ballot title, advising that the City Attorney's office is responsible for writing the ballot title. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:54 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. eD;rn,G6 Lih > Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann April 3, 2006 • RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 10, 2006 Council Chambers NIS Monday, 7:00 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN, Council President; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER; COUNCILMEMBERS TERRI BRIERE; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILWOMAN TONI NELSON. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER,Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE BONNIE WALTON,City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; LYS HORNSBY,Utility Systems Director; TERRY HIGASHIYAMA, Community Services Administrator;LESLIE BETLACH, Parks Director; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator;LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO; INTERIM CHIEF LARRY RUDE, DEPUTY CHIEF CHUCK DUFFY and FIRE MARSHAL/BATTALION CHIEF STAN ENGLER; INTERIM CHIEF KEVIN MILOSEVICH and COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE,Police Department. ADMINISTRATIVE Linda Herzog, Interim Assistant to the CAO, reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted Niloi included: * Everyone is invited to tune into KING 5 TV on April 20th at 7:00 p.m. as Evening Magazine reveals why Renton's Liberty Park Skate Park is Western Washington's official favorite according to Evening Magazine's "Best of Western Washington" contest. * The Henry Moses Aquatic Center opens to the public on June 17th. AUDIENCE COMMENT Robert Key, 1008 Anacortes Ave. NE,Renton, 98059, spoke on the topic of the Citizen Comment: Key- citizen fireworks initiative. He stated that he does not support fireworks in Citizen Initiative,Fireworks Renton,as the use of fireworks causes injuries,property loss, trauma to pets Ordinance and people, and expense to the City. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO ITEM 5.c. ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Consent Agenda Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department submitted King County Item 5.c. certified initiative petition with proposed ordinance filed by Jerry Farley. The Public Safety: Citizen proposed ordinance repeals Renton Ordinance 5088, and enacts provisions Initiative,Fireworks regarding the possession, sale, and discharge of fireworks in Renton. Approval Ordinance was sought to request that King County place the proposed fireworks ordinance on the 9/19/2006 election ballot. City Attorney Larry Warren stated that in regards to this matter, Council only ,400 has the following two options: 1)adopt the petition ordinance as is;or 2) submit the petition ordinance for the next possible election ballot, which is on 9/19/2006. April 10,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 102 I Councilmembers noted that the proposed ordinance: allows fireworks not only on July 4th, but around the New Year as well; expands the hours of fireworks rrr discharge from 15 (prior to the fireworks ban in Renton) to 125 annually; i makes it more difficult for law enforcement to prosecute the misuse of Ifireworks; and is not well written. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLACING THE PROPOSED FIREWORKS ORDINANCE ON THE ELECTION BALLOT. CARRIED. Mayor Keolker stated for the record that neither she nor any Councilmember is happy about this. Councilwoman Briere noted that the City cannot campaign against the proposed ordinance. Mayor Keolker added that Council can choose to take a position on the matter. Councilman Clawson pointed out that placing this issue on the election ballot will cost the City an estimated$85,000. Citizen Comment: Petersen - Inez Petersen,3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N.,#3, Renton, 98056, questioned Highlands Sub-Area Plan the potential expenditure of$5 million for a trail, as discussed in Committee of the Whole, when there are streets that need paving. Additionally, she commented that she has not received the financial information that she requested regarding the Highlands Sub-Area Plan Options A and B. Ms. Petersen questioned the accuracy of the City's Highlands area crime statistics, and expressed her disappointment with the Environmental Review Committee's determination on April 4th regarding the area's zoning. She noted that citizens have until April 24th to appeal this decision. Citizen Comment: Dieffenbach Lawrence Dieffenbach, 18026 Midvale Ave. N., Shoreline, 98133, stated that -Persecution of Falun Gong he was speaking on behalf of Falun Gong practitioners in Washington State, *law Practitioners requesting that Council send a message to President Bush and Governor Gregoire asking that they speak with the People's Republic of China President Hu Jintao during his upcoming visit about Falun Gong persecution in China. Mr. Dieffenbach expressed concern regarding the violation of human rights, stressing that there must be accountability in China. Citizen Comment: Tsang- Tony Tsang,5301 164th Ave. SE,Bellevue, 98006,expressed concern about Persecution of Falun Gong the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners in China, which has also extended Practitioners overseas to countries where Falun Gong is active. He urged Council to write a letter to President Bush and Governor Gregoire requesting that they talk to Chinese leader Hu Jintao about Falun Gong persecution during his upcoming visit to Seattle. Citizen Comment: Madson - Lori Madson, 1301 SW 16th St., Renton, 98055, stated that many people Citizen Initiative, Fireworks worked hard to get fireworks banned in the City of Renton, and she expressed Ordinance disappointment with the proposed citizen petition ordinance that would repeal Renton's fireworks ban ordinance. Ms. Madson commented that the effort to repeal the ban is fueled by money, as the person spearheading this effort is a lobbyist for the fireworks industry. She noted that the estimated$85,000 .¢ necessary to place the proposed ordinance on the election ballot could have been spent hiring a professional fundraiser to work with groups that profit from the selling of fireworks to find alternative ways of raising money. Ms. Madson questioned who is going to lobby for those who support the fireworks ban,and asked what she can do to help. Mayor Keolker stated that the Administration and Council are also very frustrated over this matter. City Attorney Warren explained that Councilmembers and City staff are prohibited by State law from using any City April 10,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 103 facilities to campaign for or against any ballot initiative; however, the City can provide strictly factual information such as property damage statistics. He indicated that elected officials and City staff can campaign on their own time. 1 Councilmembers made suggestions as to what type of organizations Ms. Madson can contact, and what she can do to help support the fireworks ban. It was also suggested that at a future meeting, Council invite speakers to speak for and against this initiative. Citizen Comment: Temple- Eric Temple, President of the Spirit of Washington, 625 S. 4th St.,Renton, Pavilion Building/Downtown 98055, spoke on the topic of public safety, saying that an assault occurred over Transit Center Safety the weekend at the Pavilion Building, which is used as an event center. He Concerns commented that public safety in the downtown area has been an ongoing issue, and he asked that the City take stronger action. Citizen Comment: Quincy- Don Quincy, Spirit of Washington Food and Beverage Director, 625 S. 4th St., Pavilion Building/Downtown Renton, 98055, reported that he and a client were assaulted on April 8th at the Transit Center Safety Pavilion Building by 15 kids walking through the parking lot. He asked for Concerns more police presence in the area, noting that he personally patrols the area to try to ensure that his clients and employees are safe. He described the unruly behavior, which occurs on a daily basis at the Renton Transit Center, as well as past incidents, including verbal abuse, fights, and thefts that have affected Pavilion Building events and clients. Expressing his concern for the safety of his employees and clients,Mr. Quincy asked for more help. Interim Police Chief Kevin Milosevich reported that police responded to the assault on April 8th in approximately 80 seconds. The parties involved were identified;however,Mr. Quincy chose not to press charges. The client who was also assaulted was unable to identify the perpetrator. Interim Chief ' Milosevich stated that a tremendous amount of staff time has been spent on the subject of transit center safety. He encouraged people who witness unruly behavior to call 911, and to also be willing to prosecute in cases such as this. In response to Councilman Law's inquiry, Interim Chief Milosevich reviewed when and how officers patrol the area. He acknowledged the Mayor's efforts in working with King County Metro on this issue, and noted the importance of drawing people to the downtown area. Mr. Law suggested that the police coordinate with the event center, and he asked about the enforcement of inappropriate behavior. City Attorney Warren stated that enforcement can be difficult as there is a fine line between free speech rights and violating the law. He noted that a number of statutes,such as loitering, have been found to be unconstitutional. Mr. Warren indicated that he will continue to work with the Police Department to see if there are additional ways to expand the City's authority. Councilman Law stated than an environment needs to be created whereby unruly activities are not welcome, and he suggested the possibility of allocating overtime for a stronger police presence. Councilman Clawson indicated that when a large group of people is involved, the promoters of events often hire police or security guards. He commented that Spirit of Washington is leasing the building from the City at a reasonable rate. Noting that more police officers are needed all over the City, Mr. Clawson suggested that perhaps Spirit of Washington can also contribute by hiring security for the events. REPORT NUMBER 28 January 2006 Municipal Research and Services Center • • • -(':C;5)-f • • i J ' x O • 4111M1MINMINIIIM Exercise of Powers of Initiative and Referendum How is the Power of Initiative Exercised in a Noncharter Code City? li As indicated,the power of initiative is only available in those code cities that have formally adopted l: that power. If a code city adopts this power, it is exercised primarily in the same manner as established for the commission form of government in RCW 35.17.240 - 35.17.360. When the Optional Municipal Code was adopted in 1969,rather than set out a new and different procedure for the initiative and referendum powers,the drafters merely provided that code cities use the same basic procedure that already existed for commission cities. The one exception is in the number of signatures required for a successful petition for code cities, as specified by RCW 35A.11.100. Not all types of propositions may be adopted by means of the initiative process. Only ordinances may be adopted by initiative. It is not possible to adopt resolutions by initiative. Other restrictions on the types of ordinances that may be adopted by initiative have been imposed by the legislature and the courts and are reviewed on pages 5-10 of this publication. 441400 Assuming that a code city has formally adopted the power of initiative and that the subject is an appropriate one for an initiative, the initiative process is basically as follows: 1. The proponent of the initiative must obtain signatures on the petition equal in number to 15 percent of the total number of registered voters within the city as of the date of the last preceding city general election. RCW 35A.11.100. 2. Everyone-who signs the initiative petition must add to their signature his or her place of residence,giving the street and the number. Petitions must also be printed in the form required by RCW 35A.01.040. These requirements are outlined in detail in Appendix K. 3. The signed petition must be filed with the officer designated to receive the petition(usually the city clerk),who then has three working days to transmit it to the county auditor who will review and determine the validity and adequacy of the signatures on the petition. After review, the county auditor must attach a certificate to the petition indicating whether or not it has been signed by a sufficient number of registered voters. This written certificate is then transmitted to the city officer with whom the petition was originally filed. 4. If the number of signatures is found to be insufficient, the petitioners have ten additional days to amend the petition. The amended petition is then resubmitted to the receiving officer who retransmits the petition to the county auditor. If the county auditor finds the number of signatures insufficient a second time, then the petition is returned to the person filing it. Any Initiative and Referendum Guide 13 taxpayer then has the option of filing an action in superior court to determine if the petition is sufficient. 5. If the county auditor determines that the number of signatures is sufficient, then the city council '"a'"` has two options. The first is for the city council to pass the proposed ordinance without alteration within 20 days after the county auditor's certificate of sufficiency has been received by the council. The second is to submit the measure to a vote of the people. 6. The ballot title of any initiative is to be composed of three elements: (a) an identification of the enacting legislative body and a statement of the subject matter; (b) a concise description of the measure; (c)a question asking the voters whether the enactment should be approved or rejected by the voters. The concise statement must be prepared by the city attorney and may not exceed75 words. RCW 29A.36.071. 7. Once the ballot title is filed, the county auditor will notify the proponents of the initiative of the exact language of the ballot title.If the persons filing the initiative are dissatisfied with the ballot title formulated by the city attorney,they may file an appeal within ten days in the superior court of the county where the issue is to appear on the ballot. They must indicate their objections and ask for amendment. The court will hold a hearing and render a decision certifying the correct ballot title. The decision of the superior court is final. RCW 29A.36.090. 8. The election will be held by special election not less that 45 days after the certificate of sufficiency is received by the council. The special election dates are listed in RCW 29A.04.330. (See Appendix L.) If a general election is scheduled within 90 days,the election on the initiative will take place on that date instead of on the next special election date(assuming that the general election date is at least 45 days after sufficiency of the petitions is certified). 9. The city clerk must cause the ordinance that will be submitted to the voters at an election to be published at least once in each of the daily newspapers in the city between five and twenty days before the election. If there are no daily newspapers, then publication must be in each of the weekly newspapers. 10. If a majority of the number of votes cast favor the proposed measure, it is adopted and will become effective upon certification of the election results. An ordinance that has been adopted by means of the initiative process after an election of the people may only be repealed or amended by a vote of the people. This means that the city council may not merely amend or repeal such an ordinance as is usually the case. However, the city council may initiate the amendment or repeal of the ordinance and then submit the proposition to a vote of the people. How is the Power of Referendum Exercised in a Noncharter Code City? The objective of the referendum process is to submit an ordinance that has been formally adopted by the city council to a vote of the people. The process is mainly the same as set out in +,1111100' RCW 35.17.240 - 35.17.360 for the exercise of the referendum power in commission cities. 14 Initiative and Referendum Guide CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al#: ( ¢ Submitting Data: For Agenda of: September 11, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk Staff Contact Bonnie Walton, City Clerk (x6502) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Annual certification of State Highway Routes within the CorrespondenceOrdinance Renton city limits Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business WSDOT Limited Access Routes for Renton Study Sessions WSDOT Non-Limited Access Routes for Renton Information X Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Information Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. The Washington State Department of Transportation, Transportation Data Office, has assumed responsibility for the annual identification of State Highway Routes within the limits of incorporated cities and towns, pursuant to RCW 47.24.010, and has identified the highway routes in Renton as of July 1, 2006 as follows: Non-Limited Access highway routes: (jurisdiction,control&maintenance governed by RCW 47.24.020) State Route No. 167 - from Milepost 26.48 to Milepost 27.28 State Route No. 169 on Maple Valley Highway- from Milepost 23.36 to Milepost 25.15 State Route No. 515 beginning on Benson Drive - from Milepost 5.73 to Milepost 7.82 State Route No. 900 beginning on Sunset Boulevard - from Milepost 8.48 to Milepost 14.73 State Route No. 900 Couplet (CO2NDST) on Bronson Way - from Milepost 10.71 to Milepost 11.40 Limited Access highway routes: (jurisdiction,control&maintenance by WSDOT, unless any RCW 47.24.020 provision to the contrary) State Route No. 167 - Milepost 24.43 to Milepost 26.48 State Route No. 169 on Maple Valley Highway- Milepost 25.15 to Milepost 25.26 State Route No. 405 - Milepost 1.19 to Milepost 7.99 State Route No. 900 beginning on NE Park Dr. - Milepost 12.50 to 13.05 The statewide identification document as of 7/1/2006 is on file in the City Clerk's office. I:\AGENDA BILLS PAPERS\AB-St Hwy Certification.doc/ 44r.. State Route No. 202 Couplet(COREDMND)—From beginning of couplet (Milepost 7.34)at Avondale Way westerly to end of couplet (Milepost 7.66)near NE 79th Street. State Route No. 908 beginning on NE 85th Street—From Corporate Limits (Milepost 4.51)near 132"d Avenue NE easterly via NE 85th Street; thence via Redmond Way; thence via Cleveland Street to end of route (Milepost 6.66) at Jct. SR 202. State Route No. 908 Couplet(COREDMND)on Redmond Way—From beginning of couplet (Milepost 6.66) near Gilman Street westerly to end of couplet (Milepost 6.94) at 106`h Avenue NE. Renton State Route No. 167—From S Grady Way (Milepost 26.48) northeasterly to end of route (Milepost 27.28) near Harris Street. State Route No. 169 on Maple Valley Highway—From Corporate Limits (Milepost 23.36) near 1315t Avenue SE westerly and northwesterly to Milepost 25.15. State Route No. 515 beginning on Benson Drive —From Corporate Limits (Milepost 5.73)0.26 miles north of SE 172"d Street, northerly via Benson Drive; thence via Talbott Road; thence via S Grady Street; thence via Main Avenue S to end of route (Milepost 7.82)at Jct. SR 900 Couplet swriw State Route No. 900 beginning on Sunset Boulevard—From the vicinity of South 135th Street(Milepost 8.48) easterly via Sunset Boulevard; thence via S Third Street; thence via Houser Way; thence via Mill Avenue SW; thence via Bronson Way S; thence via Sunset Boulevard N to the vicinity of SR 405 (Milepost 11.55); also, from Milepost 13.05 near Kirkland Avenue NE easterly via Sunset Boulevard NE; thence via Renton-Issaquah Avenue to the vicinity of 142nd Avenue SE(Milepost 14.73). Note: State Route No. 900 is coincident with SR 405 from Milepost 11.55 to Milepost 12.50. State Route No. 900 Couplet(CO2NDST)on Bronson Way—From beginning of couplet(Milepost 10.71) at Mill Avenue westerly via Bronson Way; thence via 2"d Street to end of couplet(Milepost 11.40) at Rainier Avenue S. Sammamish State Route No. 202 on Redmond-Fall City Road—From Corporate Limits (Milepost 9.05)near 187th Avenue NE easterly to Corporate Limits (Milepost 9.19) at 192nd Drive NE. SeaTac State Route No. 99 on Pacific Highway S—From Corporate Limits (Milepost 16.52), in the vicinity of S 216th Street, northerly to Milepost 20.43 at SR 518 overcrossing. 12 Redmond State Route No. 202 on Redmond Way—From Milepost 7.59 near Bear Creek Parkway easterly to Milepost 7.91. State Route No. 520—From Corporate Limits (Milepost 9.19), at the 148th Avenue NE under crossing, northerly and easterly to end of route(Milepost 12.83). Renton State Route No. 167—South Corporate Limits (Milepost 24.43) at E Valley Road northerly to S Grady Way (Milepost 26.48). State Route No. 169 on Maple Valley Highway—From Milepost 25.15 westerly to end of route (Milepost 25.26) at Jct. SR 900. State Route No. 405—West Corporate Limits (Milepost 1.19) at Tukwila, near Jct. SR 181, easterly and northerly to North Corporate Limits (Milepost 7.99) in the vicinity of NE 44th Street. State Route No. 900 beginning on NE Park Drive—From Jct. SR 405 (Milepost 12.50)easterly via NE Park Drive; thence via Sunset Boulevard NE to Milepost 13.05 near Kirkland Avenue. SeaTac State Route No. 5—From the South Corporate Limits at Milepost 149.53 northerly to the North Corporate Limits (Milepost 152.39)in the vicinity of South 188th Street; also, from the South Corporate Limits at Milepost 152.61 northerly to the North Corporate Limits at Milepost 153.44. State Route No. 509 on Des Moines Memorial Drive—From Corporate Limits (Milepost 24.29B)near 8th Avenue S southeasterly Corporate Limits at Milepost 24.34B; also, from Corporate Limits at Milepost 24.35B northerly to Corporate Limits (Milepost 24.45) at the Des Moines Way over crossing. State Route No. 518—From Corporate Limits (Milepost 0.60) at the Des Moines Way S over crossing easterly, southeasterly, and easterly to Corporate Limits at Milepost 2.51. Seattle State Route No. 5—South Corporate Limits (Milepost 158.18) at South Ryan Street northerly to North Corporate Limits (Milepost 174.58) at Northeast 145th Street. State Route No. 5 Reversible—From beginning of route (Milepost 165.29) near Seneca Street to end of route (Milepost 172.43)near 1st Avenue NE. State Route No. 90—From beginning of route(Milepost 1.94) at 4th Avenue S easterly to Corporate Limits at Milepost 5.08. 11 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al#: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk September 11, 2006 Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Bid opening on August 30, 2006, for CAG-06-I41, Correspondence.. May Creek Bank Stabilization: Edmonds Ave. Outfall Ordinance Replacement Project Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Staff Recommendation Study Sessions Bid Tabulation Sheet (ten bids) Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $139,060 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Niiisol Total Project Budget $399,500 City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineers Estimate: $169,337.40 In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Fury Construction, LLC in the amount of$139,060. 0ti`°Y 0 PLANNING/BUILDING/ cm, + PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 1, 2006 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: ..Ronald Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor (ext. 7248) STAFF CONTACT: Steve Lee, Surface Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7205) SUBJECT: May Creek Bank Stabilization: Edmonds Ave. Outfall Replacement Project, SWP-27-3037 Construction Bid Award Recommendation The bid opening for the May Creek Bank Stabilization: Edmonds Avenue Outfall Replacement Project, SWP-27-3037 was held on August 30, 2006, at 2:30 p.m. Ten (10) bids were received. The engineer's estimate for the project construction cost was $169,337.40. The low bid for the project was $139,060.00 from Fury Construction, LLC (using tax rule �r 171). The Surface Water Utility has reviewed the low hid for completeness, inclusion of all required forms, acknowledgments of addenda, bid bond, and mathematical correctness of the bid. All the paperwork is in order. During the Surface Water Utility review for low bid completeness, two contractors had errors in their written unit price. Taggart Construction wrote "one hundred fifty dollars", yet numerically wrote $30.00 as their unit price. Even if the bidder meant "one hundred fifty dollars" as the unit price, the order of the bidders does not change. Taggart Construction's total changes from $177,275.00 to $191,675.00, but the order of the bidders does not change. The Surface Water Utility also reviewed Marine Vacuum Service's bid. Marine Vacuum Service incorrectly wrote the number out as the sub-total cost for the bid item instead of writing the unit cost for the bid item. Even if the written word governs and is multiplied by the quantity, the overall winning bidder is not affected. The low bid of$139,060.00 is within the amount that the Surface Water Utility has budgeted for the project. The project will be funded from account number 427.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065350. The approved 2006 Capitol Improvements Program (CIP) budget is $399,500. There is currently $340,737 of unencumbered funds in the account. The bid award for the May Creek Bank Stabilization: Edmonds Avenue Outfall Replacement Project, on the September 11, 2006, Council Agenda, will require approximately $139,060.00 from the account for the project construction. There are sufficient funds in the 2006 May Creek Bank Stabilization Program account to fund y�rr Walton/Bid Opening May Creek September I.2006 Page 2 of 2 construction and staff costs for the Edmonds Avenue Stormwater Outfall Replacement Project. The low bid meets the following conditions for award: 1. The low bid must be within the total project budget; 2. There must be more than one bidder; and 3. The lowest, responsible, responsive bid contains no significant irregularities. The Surface Water Utility, therefore, recommends that this item be placed on the September 11, 2006, consent agenda for Council concur. Staff further recommends that Council award the construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Fury Construction for the amount of$139,060.00. Attached for your reference, is a bid tabulation showing the engineer's estimate, the low bid, and the other nine (9) bids submitted. I am also returning the bid documents from all ten (10) bidders to you for the City Clerk's files. If you have any questions, please contact Steve Lee. Attachments cc: Gregg Zimmerman. PBPW Administrator Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects(CIP)\27-3037 May Creek Slope Stabilization Program\1 100 Design and Planning\MayCreekSite2\Correspondence\00413 Award-Clerk.doc\SLtp CITY OF RENTON Page 1 of BID TABULATION SHEET ,,PROJECT: May Creek Bank Stabilization: Edmonds Ave. Storm Replacement; CAG-06-141 DATE: August 30, 2006 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Bond Form Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc. X X $167,044.55 PO Box 595 Redmond, WA 98073-0595 Janie Craig DPK, Inc. X X $248,020.00 7829 S. 206th St. Kent, WA 98032 David Kiyohara Gary Merlino Const. Co., Inc. X X $218,625.00 9125 10th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 Gary Merlino Jansen, Inc. X X $176,562.00 '181 Buchanan Loop y ,,.erndale, WA 98248 Grant Jansen Marine Vacuum Service, Inc. X X $247,591.80 PO Box 24263 Seattle, WA 98124 Pete Talakai Nordic Construction X X $148,465.00 106 - 55th Ave. E. Tacoma, WA 98424-2426 Gordon J. Ericksen Road Construction Northwest, Inc. X X $192,743.00 PO Box 188 Renton, WA 98055-0188 Peter J. Kenney C.D. Construction & Mgmt. X X $194,743.81 PO Box 1 148 • Renton, WA 98057-1148 Carlos E. Bueno w CITY OF RENTON Page 2 of 2 BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: May Creek Bank Stabilization: Edmonds Ave. Storm Replacement: CAG-06-141 DATE: August 30,2006 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Bond Form Taggart Construction, Inc. X X 18633 13th Dr. SE 5191,675.00 * Bothell, WA 98012 Oliver Graham Fury Construction, LLC X X S 139,060.00 PO Box 1 198 North Bend, WA 98045 Denis Fury ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $169,337.40 squid *corrected LEGEND: Forms:Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage ( ( ( , Project Title: May Creek Bank Stabilization: At Endmonds Ave Storm Replacement Outfall Fury Construction BID DATE: Sept.6,2006 City of Renton Engineers Estimate Item Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid No. Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount 1 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 16,102.40 16,102.40 15,000.00 15,000.00 2 Construction Survey,Staking, and As-Bui Lump Sum 1 4,896.00 4,896.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 3 Traffic Control, including Plan Lump Sum 1 5,440.00 5,440.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 5,984.00 5,984.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 5 Trench Excavation Safety System Lump Sum 1 1,632.00 1,632.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 6 Import Trench Backfill Ton 50 16.32 816.00 25.00 1,250.00 7 Plugging Existing Pipe Lump Sum 1 1,088.00 1,088.00 800.00 800.00 8 Modify Existing Manhole Lump Sum 1 3,808.00 3,808.00 500.00 500.00 9 24-inch Dia. HDPE Storm Pipe, SDR26 Lump Sum 360 136.00 48,960.00 115.00 41,400.00 10 Concrete Block with Wall Anchor Each 2 1,305.60 2,611.20 2,500.00 5,000.00 11 Manhole,48-inch Dia.W/Overflow Birdc< Each 1 13,600.00 13,600.00 11,500.00 11,500.00 12 Shoring or Extra Excavation Cl. B Sq-Ft 600 5.50 3,300.00 8.00 4,800.00 13 Structure Excavation Class B, Incl. Haul Cu-Yd 123 27.20 3,345.60 20.00 2,460.00 14 Helical Earth Anchor Each 24 856.80 20,563.20 500.00 12,000.00 15 Gabion Mattress Lump Sum 1 3,264.00 3,264.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 16 Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion Ctrl Lump Sum 1 2,720.00 2,720.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 17 Seeding, Fertilizing, and Mulching Lump Sum 1 2,176.00 2,176.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 18 Spill Prevention,Control, &Countermeas Lump Sum 1 13,056.00 13,056.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 19 Shoulder Ballast Ton 120 54.40 6,528.00 30.00 3,600.00 20 Construction Geo-textile for Permanent E Sq-Ft 50 13.10 655.00 5.00 250.00 21 Quarry Spalls Cu-Yd 2 110.00 220.00 100.00 200.00 22 Temporary Stormwater Bypass System Lineal Feet 1 1,632.00 1,632.00 800.00 800.00 1 23 Landscaping and Planting (Lump Sum) Lump Sum 1 5,440.00 5,440.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 24 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 Subtotal $169,337.40 Subtotal $139,060.00 Project Uses Sales Tax Rule 171,tax included in bid items. 0.00% Sales Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 �`� d, p / a By: , ',�;;,4.v_,, ,:—,,„_ ;�i, `y» Total $169,337.40 Total $139,060.00 BidTab-060831-May Creek3.XLS Page 1 Project Title: May Creek Bank Stabilization: At Endmonds Ave Storm I Nordic Construction Dennis Craig Constr. Jansen, Inc BID DATE: Sept.6,2006 Item Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid No. Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 1 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 12,201.00 12,201.00 15,485.00 15,485.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 2 Construction Survey, Staking, and As-Bui Lump Sum 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 4,300.00 4,300.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 3 Traffic Control, including Plan Lump Sum 1 2,055.00 2,055.00 4,460.00 4,460.00 3,600.00 3,600.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 3,020.00 3,020.00 14,177.50 14,177.50 27,700.00 27,700.00 5 Trench Excavation Safety System Lump Sum 1 900.00 900.00 1,750.00 1,750.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 6 Import Trench Backfill Ton 50 25.00 1,250.00 41.50 2,075.00 86.00 4,360.00 7 Plugging Existing Pipe Lump Sum 1 2,700.00 2,700.00 544.00 544.00 3,400.00 3,400.00 8 Modify Existing Manhole Lump Sum 1 2,600.00 2,600.00 4,414.00 4,414.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 9 24-inch Dia. HDPE Storm Pipe, SDR26 Lump Sum 360 130.00 46,800.00 110.90 39,924.00 95.00 34,200.00 10 Concrete Block with Wall Anchor Each 2 4,665.00 9,330.00 3,951.00 7,902.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 11 Manhole,48-inch Dia.W/Overflow Birdc Each 1 8,500.00 8,500.00 19,730.00 19,730.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 12 Shoring or Extra Excavation Cl. B Sq-Ft 600 3.50 2,100.00 3.00 1,800.00 2.00 1,200.00 13 Structure Excavation Class B, Incl. Haul Cu-Yd 123 33.00 4,059.00 35.35 4,348.05 24.00 2,952.00 14 Helical Earth Anchor Each 24 600.00 14,400.00 545.00 13,080.00 450.00 10,800.00 15 Gabion Mattress Lump Sum 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,215.00 4,215.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 16 Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion Ctrl Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 2,120.00 2,120.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 17 Seeding, Fertilizing, and Mulching Lump Sum 1 2,300.00 2,300.00 2,250.00 2,250.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 18 Spill Prevention, Control, &Countermeas Lump Sum 1 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 3,600.00 3,600.00 19 Shoulder Ballast Ton 120 25.00 3,000.00 48.50 5,820.00 43.00 5,160.00 20 Construction Geo-textile for Permanent E Sq-Ft 50 28.00 1,400.00 15.00 750.00 17.00 850.00 21 Quarry Spalls Cu-Yd 2 100.00 200.00 1,275.00 2,550.00 300.00 600.00 22 Temporary Stormwater Bypass System Lineal Feet 1 800.00 800.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 23 Landscaping and Planting (Lump Sum) Lump Sum 1 16,350.00 16,350.00 7,850.00 7,850.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 24 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 Subtotal $148,465.00 Subtotal $167,044.55 Subtotal $176,562.00 Project Uses Sales Tax Rule 171,tax included in bid items. 0.00% Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 + ''a.- t Total $148,465.00 Total $167,044.55 Total $176,562.00 BidTa '831-May Creek3.XLS age 2 • ( ( k , Project Title: May Creek Bank Stabilization:At Endmonds Ave Storm Taggart Constr., Inc. Road Constr. NW, Inc. CD Constr. &Mgt., Inc. i BID DATE: Sept.6,2006 Item Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid No. Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 1 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 17,000.00 17,000.00 19,000.00 19,000.00 18,600.00 18,600.00 2 Construction Survey,Staking,and As-Bui Lump Sum 1 6,000.00 6,000.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 3,968.00 3,968.00 j 3 Traffic Control, including Plan Lump Sum 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 1,736.00 1,736.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 7,192.00 7,192.00 5 Trench Excavation Safety System Lump Sum 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 2,232.00 2,232.00 6 Import Trench Backfill Ton 50 35.00 1,750.00 75.00 3,750.00 28.52 1,426.00 7 Plugging Existing Pipe Lump Sum 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,232.00 2,232.00 8 Modify Existing Manhole Lump Sum 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 3,472.00 3,472.00 9 24-inch Dia. HDPE Storm Pipe, SDR26 Lump Sum 360 100.00 36,000.00 141.00 50,760.00 150.58 54,208.80 10 Concrete Block with Wall Anchor Each 2 1,500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 5,952.00 11,904.00 11 Manhole,48-inch Dia.W/Overflow Birdc, Each 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 11,065.50 11,065.50 12 Shoring or Extra Excavation Cl. B Sq-Ft 600 2.00 1,200.00 3.00 1,800.00 11.53 6,91.8.00 13 Structure Excavation Class B, Incl. Haul Cu-Yd 123 25.00 3,075.00 55.00 6,765.00 22.32 2,745.36 14 Helical Earth Anchor Each 24 500.00 12,000.00 450.00 10,800.00 1,116.00 26,784.00 15 Gabion Mattress Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 4,712.00 4,712.00 16 Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion Ctrl Lump Sum 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 7,192.00 7,192.00 17 Seeding, Fertilizing, and Mulching Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 500.00 500.00 2,137.00 2,137.00 18 Spill Prevention, Control, &Countermeas Lump Sum 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,278.00 4,278.00 19 Shoulder Ballast Ton 120 150.00 18,000.00 144.00 17,280.00 28.52 3,422.40 20 Construction Geo-textile for Permanent E Sq-Ft 50 10.00 500.00 44.00 2,200.00 94.24 4,712.00 21 Quarry Spalls Cu-Yd 2 75.00 150.00 444.00 888.00 49.60 99.20 22 Temporary Stormwater Bypass System Lineal Feet 1 12,000.00 12,000.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 7,688.00 7,688.00 23 Landscaping and Planting (Lump Sum) Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 4,519.55 4,51;9.55 24 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 Subtotal $191,675.00 Subtotal $192,743.00 Subtotal $194,743.81 Project Uses Sales Tax Rule 171,tax included in bid items. 0.00% Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 By: ,vim% >/ Total $191,675.00 Total $192,743.00 Total $194,743.81 BidTab-060831-May Creek3.XLS Page 3 Project Title: May Creek Bank Stabilization: At Endmonds Ave Storm Gary Merlino Constr. Co. Marine Vacuum Serv., Inc DPK, Inc. BID DATE: Sept.6, 2006 Item Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid No. Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 1 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 20,000.00 20,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 24,000.00 24,000.00 2 Construction Survey, Staking, and As-But Lump Sum 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 4,550.00 4,550.00 3 Traffic Control, including Plan Lump Sum 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 5 Trench Excavation Safety System Lump Sum 1 500.00 500.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 100.00 100.00 6 Import Trench Backfill Ton 50 50.00 2,500.00 45.00 2,250.00 32.00 1,600.00 7 Plugging Existing Pipe Lump Sum 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 600.00 600.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 8 Modify Existing Manhole Lump Sum 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 725.80 725.80 3,000.00 3,000.00 9 24-inch Dia. HDPE Storm Pipe, SDR26 Lump Sum 360 290.50 104,580.00 200.00 72,000.00 335.00 120,600.00 10 Concrete Block with Wall Anchor Each 2 3,500.00 7,000.00 3,000.00 6,000.00 2,400.00 4,800.00 11 Manhole,48-inch Dia. W/Overflow Birdc Each 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 12 Shoring or Extra Excavation Cl. B Sq-Ft 600 5.00 3,000.00 8.00 4,800.00 0.10 60.00 13 Structure Excavation Class B, Incl. Haul Cu-Yd 123 15.00 1,845.00 42.00 5,166.00 30.00 3,690.00 14 Helical Earth Anchor Each 24 900.00 21,600.00 300.00 7,200.00 750.00 18,000.00 15 Gabion Mattress Lump Sum 1 7,500.00 7,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 16 Temporary Water Pollution/ Erosion Ctrl Lump Sum 1 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 17 Seeding, Fertilizing, and Mulching Lump Sum 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 18 Spill Prevention, Control, &Countermeas Lump Sum 1 500.00 500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 500.00 500.00 19 Shoulder Ballast Ton 120 65.00 7,800.00 45.00 5,400.00 36.00 4,320.00 20 Construction Geo-textile for Permanent E Sq-Ft 50 6.00 300.00 12.00 600.00 30.00 1,500.00 21 Quarry Spalls Cu-Yd 2 250.00 500.00 175.00 350.00 100.00 200.00 22 Temporary Stormwater Bypass System Lineal Feet 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 3,600.00 3,600.00 23 Landscaping and Planting (Lump Sum) Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 24 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 Subtotal $218,625.00 Subtotal $247,591.80 Subtotal $248,020.00 Project Uses Sales Tax Rule 171,tax included in bid items. 0.00% Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 } / / By: > ,dM - ' Total $218,625.00 Total $247,591.80 Total $248,020.00 Iy'7 BidTab 931-May Creek3.XLS age 4 ., ( it. Project Title: May Creek Bank Stabilization: At Endmonds Ave Storm I Bidder#11 Bidder#12 STATI BID DATE: Sept.6,2006 Engineer's Low Estimate Bidder Item Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid No. Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount Unit Price Unit Price 1 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 16,102.40 15,000.00 2 Construction Survey, Staking, and As-Bui Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 4,896.00 5,000.00 3 Traffic Control, including Plan Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 5,440.00 3,500.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 5,984.00 12,000.00 5 Trench Excavation Safety System Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 1,632.00 2,000.00 6 Import Trench Backfill Ton 50 0.00 0.00 16.32 25.00 7 Plugging Existing Pipe Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 1,088.00 800.00 8 Modify Existing Manhole Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 3,808.00 500.00 9 24-inch Dia. HDPE Storm Pipe, SDR26 Lump Sum 360 0.00 0.00 136.00 115.00 10 Concrete Block with Wall Anchor Each 2 0.00 0.00 1,305.60 2,500.00 11 Manhole,48-inch Dia. W/Overflow Birdct Each 1 0.00 0.00 13,600.00 11,500.00 12 Shoring or Extra Excavation Cl. B Sq-Ft 600 0.00 0.00 5.50 8.00 13 Structure Excavation Class B, Incl. Haul Cu-Yd 123 0.00 0.00 27.20 20.00 14 Helical Earth Anchor Each 24 0.00 0.00 856.80 500.00 15 Gabion Mattress Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 3,264.00 3,000.00 16 Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion Ctrl Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 2,720.00 2,000.00 17 Seeding, Fertilizing, and Mulching Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 2,176.00 2,500.00 18 Spill Prevention,Control,&Countermeas Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 13,056.00 3,000.00 19 Shoulder Ballast Ton 120 0.00 0.00 54.40 30.00 20 Construction Geo-textile for Permanent E Sq-Ft 50 0.00 0.00 13.10 5.00 21 Quarry Spalls Cu-Yd 2 0.00 0.00 110.00 100.00 22 Temporary Stormwater Bypass System Lineal Feet 1 0.00 0.00 1,632.00 800.00 23 Landscaping and Planting (Lump Sum) Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 5,440.00 5,000.00 24 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 (Averages below from Subtotal $0.00 Subtotal $0.00 $169,337.40 $139,060.00 Project Uses Sales Tax Rule 171,tax included in bid items. 0.00% Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 By: ;)Z- a_ ,;','e ,�; Total $0.00 Total $0.00 $169,337.40 $139,060.00 BidTab-060831-May Creek3.XLS Page 5 Project Title: May Creek Bank Stabilization:At Endmonds Ave Storm STICAL SUMMARY BID DATE: Sept.6,2006 Average Average Median Three All Bids All Bids Item Unit Est. Lowest Bids No. Description Quantity Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price 1 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 14,228.67 18,228.60 17,800.00 2 Construction Survey, Staking, and As-Bui Lump Sum 1 4,266.67 6,131.80 4,775.00 3 Traffic Control, including Plan Lump Sum 1 3,338.33 5,685.10 4,030.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 1 9,732.50 13,058.95 13,088.75 5 Trench Excavation Safety System Lump Sum 1 1,550.00 2,218.20 1,875.00 6 Import Trench Backfill Ton 50 1,525.00 2,215.10 1,912.50 7 Plugging Existing Pipe Lump Sum 1 1,348.00 2,047.60 2,366.00 8 Modify Existing Manhole Lump Sum 1 2,504.67 3,221.18 3,736.00 9 24-inch Dia. HDPE Storm Pipe, SDR26 Lump Sum 360 42,708.00 60,047.28 48,780.00 10 Concrete Block with Wall Anchor Each 2 7,410.67 6,693.60 6,000.00 11 Manhole, 48-inch Dia. W/Overflow Birdc Each 1 13,243.33 12,579.55 11,282.75 12 Shoring or Extra Excavation Cl. B Sq-Ft 600 2,900.00 2,767.80 1,950.00 13 Structure Excavation Class B, Incl. Haul Cu-Yd 123 3,622.35 3,710.54 3,382.50 14 Helical Earth Anchor Each 24 13,160.00 14,666.40 12,540.00 15 Gabion Mattress Lump Sum 1 3,738.33 4,692.70 4,463.50 16 Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion Ctrl Lump Sum 1 3,040.00 4,881.20 3,500.00 17 Seeding, Fertilizing, and Mulching Lump Sum 1 2,350.00 1,968.70 2,068.50 18 Spill Prevention,Control,&Countermeas Lump Sum 1 1,333.33 1,987.80 2,250.00 19 Shoulder Ballast Ton 120 4,140.00 7,380.24 5,280.00 20 Construction Geo-textile for Permanent E Sq-Ft 50 800.00 1,306.20 800.00 21 Quarry Spalls Cu-Yd 2 983.33 573.72 275.00 22 Temporary Stormwater Bypass System Lineal Feet 1 2,366.67 6,438.80 6,250.00 23 Landscaping and Planting (Lump Sum) Lump Sum 1 9,733.33 8,451.96 6,000.00 24 Minor Changes Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 i Bid Subtotals,NOT calculated from unit prices above) $151,523.18; $192,453.02; $192,209.00; Project Uses Sales Tax Rule 171, tax included in bid items. 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 By: o ',(- ,-% r /4--\-- ° :". '" $151,523.18 $192,453.02 $192,209.00 _r I BidTa '831-May Creek3.XLS 'age 6 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk September 11, 2006 Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Bid opening on September 6, 2006, for CAG-06-159, Correspondence.. Renton Ave. S./S. 3rd St. Storm System Outfall Ordinance Relocation Project Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Staff Recommendation Study Sessions Bid Tabulation Sheet (two bids) Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $53,940 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $229,000 City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineers Estimate: $23,516 In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $53,940. C�`sY �� PLANNING/BUILDING/ ♦ r; ® ♦ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMOR ANDUM DATE: September 6, 2006 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor(ext. 7248) STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Carey, Surface Water Utility Engineer(ext. 7293) SUBJECT: Renton Ave S/S 3rd St Storm System Outfall Project, SWP-27-3334 Construction Bid Award Recommendation The bid opening for the Renton Ave S /S 3`d St Storm System Project, SWP-27-3334 was held on September 6, 2006, at 11:00 a.m. Two (2) bids were received. The engineer's estimate for the project construction cost was $23,516.00. The low bid for the project was $53,940.00 (including sales tax) from Gary Merlino Construction Co. The Surface Water Utility has reviewed the low bid for completeness, *'' inclusion of all required forms, acknowledgments of addenda, bid bond, and mathematical correctness of the bid. All the paperwork is in order. The low bid of$53,940.00 is within the amount that the Surface Water Utility has in the project account. The Surface Water Utility's Engineer's Estimate was probably too low because it did not fully consider the small size of the project and the fixed costs in labor and machinery that a contractor would need to cover. The project will be funded from account number 427.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065015, the Small Drainage Projects Program. The approved 2006 Capitol Improvements Program (CIP) budget is $229,000. There is currently$199,000 of unencumbered funds in the account. There are sufficient funds in the 2006 Small Drainage Project Program account to fund construction and staff costs for the Renton Ave S /S 3rd St Storm System Outfall Project. The low bid meets the following conditions for award: 1. The low bid must be within the total project budget; 2. There must be more than one bidder; and 3. The lowest, responsible, responsive bid contains no significant irregularities. The Surface Water Utility, therefore, recommends that this item be placed on the September 11, 2006, consent agenda for Council concur. Staff further recommends that Council award the construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Gary Merlino Construction Co, for the amount of$53,940.00. Walton/Renton Ave/S 311 Bid Award September 6,2006 Page 2 of 2 NIS Attached for your reference, is a bid tabulation showing the engineer's estimate, the low bid, and the other one (1) bid submitted. I am also returning all the bid envelopes, and the bid documents from the other bidders to you for the City Clerk's files. If you have any questions, please contact Daniel Carey, Project Manager. Attachments cc: Gregg Zimmerman,PBPW Administrator Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Division Director H:\File Sys\SWP- Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects(CIP)\27-3334-Renton Ave Outfall\1000-1 Corrspd-City\060906 Award-Clerk.doc\DCtp CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET Renton Ave. S./S. 3rd St. Storm System Outfall Relocation; CAG-06-159 DATE: September 6,2006 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Includes 8.8%Sales Tax Bond Form Addendum Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc. X X X $64,017.30 PO Box 595 Redmond, WA 98073-0595 Janie Craig Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc. X X X (i40 00 9125 10th Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 Gary Merlino 1GINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $23,516.00 LEGEND: Forms:Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage Project Title: Renton Ave S/S 3rd St Storm System Outfall Relocation Gary Merlino Constr. Co. Dennis R. Craig BID DATE: Sept.6,2006 11:00 am City of Renton Constr. Co. Engineers Estimate Item Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid Unit Bid No. Description Quantity Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount 1 Mobilization Lump Sum 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 6,333.00 6,333.00 2 Construction Survey, Staking, and As Lump Sum 1 800.00 800.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,325.00 1,325.00 3 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 11,167.00 11,167.00 4 Erosion Control Lump Sum 1 300.00 300.00 500.00 500.00 750.00 750.00 5 Trench Excavation Safety Systems Lump Sum 1 500.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 6 Pothole Utility Each 1 400.00 400.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 573.00 573.00 7 Catch Basin Type IL Each 1 1,400.00 1,400.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 1,698.00 1,698.00 8 Core Drill Catch Basin Each 2 500.00 1,000.00 500.00 1,000.00 750.00 1,500.00 9 Connect New Pipe to Existing CB Each 4 200.00 800.00 500.00 2,000.00 645.00 2,580.00 10 Plug Existing Pipe Each 1 250.00 250.00 600.00 600.00 340.00 340.00 11 18-inch CPEP Storm Pipe Linear Foot 94 65.00 6,110.00 155.00 14,570.00 70.45 6,622.30 12 Sawcutting Linear Foot 350 1.80 630.00 2.00 700.00 2.50 875.00 13 Quarry Spalls Ton 5 22.00 110.00 100.00 500.00 89.00 445.00 14 Import Trench Backfill Ton 40 15.00 600.00 30.00 1,200.00 38.95 1,558.00 15 Crushed Surfacing Ton 12 23.00 276.00 60.00 720.00 48.50 582.00 16 Asphalt Concrete Pavement Class B Ton 18 80.00 1,440.00 175.00 3,150.00 275.00 4,950.00 17 Remove, Replace Conc. Curb and GL Linear Foot 60 30.00 1,800.00 60.00 3,600.00 68.95 4,137.00 18 Remove, Replace Conc. Sidewalk Square Yard 12 50.00 600.00 150.00 1,800.00 295.00 3,540.00 19 Sidewalk Ramp Type 2, Stop Line Lump Sum 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,600.00 2,600.00 1,895.00 1,895.00 20 Erosion Ditch Repair Lump Sum 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 12,647.00 12,647.00 Subtotal $23,516.00 Subtotal $53,940.00 Subtotal $64,017.30 Project Uses Sales Tax Rule 171, tax included in bid items.' 0.00% Sales Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 Tax $0.00 By: PQ 9.-‘-0,6 Total $23,516.00 Total $53,940.00 Total $64,017.30 BidTab -'enS3rd-Add01.XLS 'age 1 V CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: a Submitting Data: Community Services For Agenda of: Facilities/Municipal Arts Commission September 11, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Staff Contact Peter Renner, Facilities Director Ext. 6605 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Approval of 1% for Arts project for New Park. Correspondence Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper with Attachment. Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Community Services Committee. Legal Dept Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: ` Expenditure Required... $9,800.00 Transfer/Amendment �` Amount Budgeted $10,000.00 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $14,320.00 available City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City is building a new park in the Heather Downs neighborhood. 1% for Arts funds generated by this construction project can be used to place public art in the new park. The Municipal Arts Commission has reviewed a wide variety of alternatives and is recommending the project described in the attached Issue Paper. This was presented to Park Board on July 11, 2006. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the project as presented and approve the total project budget of$10,000. Ekkarl Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh -0w 0 0 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT `;t, MEMOR ANDUM DATE: September 11, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Terry Higashiyama;=.Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Peter Renner, Facilities Director, Ext. 6605 SUBJECT: Art Project for the New Neighborhood Park Issue: Should the Council approve the total expenditure of$10,000 from Fund 125 for the art project proposed by the Municipal Arts Commission for the neighborhood park currently under construction? Recommendation: Approve the expenditure of$10,000 from Fund 125 for the proposed art project. Now Background: • The City of Renton funds art for its municipal building projects through a 1% for Art Program. • Construction of the new area park will generate $13,400 through 1% for Art. • The Municipal Arts Commission(MAC), which is trusted with assessing public art and making related recommendations to the Mayor, developed, reviewed, and discussed a number of concepts for public art for the new park. • The MAC focused on projects that would incorporate the City theme that"Renton is a great place to live, work, and play". Reflecting the diversity of the neighborhood was also an important project component for the Commission. • Beside visual appeal, potential art concepts were also evaluated for their scale, durability, safety, maintainability, vandal resistance, and relative ease of installation. • Various placement options and methods of production and installation were considered. • The Municipal Arts Commission is proposing inset etched stainless steel panels around the 72' circumference of a concrete seating wall that surrounds a prime feature of the park, a landscaped berm. Attached exhibits are provided to show the scale and location of the work in the park. The word "Home"will be replicated in the 48 languages spoken in the Renton School District. More h:\peter renner 2006\newparkartissuepaper.doc Page 2 of 2 September 1 I,2006 detailed conceptual representations will be available for review when the project *44004 is considered in the Community Services Committee. • The MAC is seeking approval for the project now because funding is needed for the translation service. • The total budget for this project is $10,000 and includes Washington State Sales Tax. The dollars for this project are available in Fund 125. • Presented to Park Board on July 11, 2006. Conclusion: The public art that has been developed and proposed by the Municipal Arts Commission will enhance the quality and appearance of the park and serve as an open invitation for all neighborhood and City residents to feel welcome to use and enjoy it. Attachments as stated cc: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Michael Bailey,Finance Director Michael O'Halloran,RMAC Chairman h:\peter renner 2006\newparkartissuepaper.doc `rrrr "No Name" Park .;. 1% PUBLIC ART PROPOSAL June 9, 2006 Prepared by Dawn Murin *are The Municipal Arts Commission is submitting the following public art proposal for the new park that is being constructed in the Heather Downs neighborhood. Budget: $10,000 Project Objective: To provide a piece of art that is functional and also representative of the diversity of this Renton neighborhood. Project Concept: The City of Renton's theme is: "Renton —a great place to live, work and plat. " The Heather Downs community is rich in cultural diversity. The concept for the art piece attempts to incorporate these ideas cohesively by addressing the City's theme that Renton is a great place to live (it is our"Home") and play(the art is in the park), and the art will reflect the diversity of the neighborhood. Within the new park, there will be a large seat wall to provide an additional seating area in the park piazza. The seat wall will encircle a landscaped berm. On hot summer days, this seating area will be especially inviting, as the trees planted within the berm will *4100 provide a cooling shade. The "art part"of the seat wall would incorporate a series of stainless steel sheets installed around the seat wall. Each sheet would have the word "Home" etched into its surface, translated into the dozens of languages currently spoken in Renton as per the Renton School District. Project placement: The placement would be in the approximate center of Piazza just off the parking lot between the restrooms and picnic shelter (see last page map). Project specifics: The seat wall will be concrete, circular, 18" tall, and 72 feet in circumference. The seat wall will have an 11" high recess around its entirety for placement of the metal sheets. The recess is for the safety of the people sitting on the wall (so they don't scrape their legs on the edge of the metal), and to reduce the risk of vandalism. Sixteen stainless steel metal sheets will encircle the seat wall within the 11" tall recess, spaced six inches apart, fastened with 1/4" screws. The sheets are to be .063 stainless steel; 10"tall by 48"wide, with a stock color paint fill in the"home" etchings, and finished with a protective coating. For ease of installation, the metal fabricator will roll the sheets slightly to match the radius of the seat wall. +�rri.r Current quotes (tax not included): Metal Sheets: $5,680 Language Translation: $2,700 Why do we propose using a translation service for such a simple word as "home"? In researching this project, the MAC discovered that some languages have many words for"home", even more than English. There are translation companies that specialize in making sure the word chosen to describe "home" will accurately represent the word as intended and not another concept. We do not have this kind of collective language expertise available locally. It was discussed with the Renton School District using students to assistance with translation but in some cases, the grasp of English is not sufficient. Coordination was also problematic. Furthermore, the translation service will also provide the words in a format acceptable for production, that is, with an appropriate font for each language with the necessary accent marks and digital-scanner-ready. This is part of the expense of the project regardless of the production process we use. As with the art project at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center, etched stainless steel is an ideal art medium. It is very attractive, durable, vandal-resistant, and requires little maintenance. The installation method will not be overly complicated. Now The project will be located in an area in the Park with relatively high visibility and prominence. `raw I II \ 'ICN IC 'HELTER PLA/7 ZN Af 23' V \ I co L ! :\\ 1 I , Prc,azdds,,,:,wan C\I . / . . I \ \ PARKING I I ' , I 1 — RESTROOM 1-- "9 \. ,, 5 ,, , I , , . !I / 1 , t , 1 ! I . 0 0 i •:, ,---:--- 1 1 \ 4.i,,,, , (L. ( CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al#. p" Submitting Data: For Agenda of: September 11, 2006 iikapi Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Parks Staff Contact Terry Higashiyama(x-6606) Agenda Status Leslie Betlach(x-6619) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Springbrook Trail Missing Link Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Questionnaire/Map/Letter Information Map with Photos WSDOT Trail Cost Estimate Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Community Services Committee for a briefing Legal Dept Refer to Committee of the Whole Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: IliExpenditure Required... $1,599,997 (estimate) Transfer/Amendment $239,997 Amount Budgeted $1,360,000 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $1,599,997 City Share Total Project $1,599,997 SUMMARY OF ACTION: A briefing to the Community Services Committee on the Springbrook Trail Missing Link located in the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank project area is requested. No action would be taken by the Community Services Committee. A presentation to the Committee of the Whole is requested for October 2, 2006, after the WSDOT bid opening for the I-405 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Bank construction project in the bank area. Committee of the Whole action will be required in order to authorize construction of the Springbrook Trail Missing Link as part of the WSDOT/City Wetland Bank project. Funding for the project from 2007 Budget requests would be reimbursed in future years from the sale of Mitigation Bank credits. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize funding and approve the trail construction for the Springbrook Trail Missing Link as part of the WSDOT I-405 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Bank construction project. illifeire Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh s, ® COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 'N�o� MEMORANDUM DATE: September 6, 2006 TO: Kathy Keolker, Mayor CC: Jay Covingto Chief Administrative Officer FROM: Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Betlach, Parks Director(x6611fafti__ SUBJECT: Springbrook Trail Missing Link Issue: Should the Springbrook Trail Missing Link be constructed as part of the I-405 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank project? Background: • The Springbrook Trail was first identified as the "Springbrook Valley Trail"in the City of Renton Trails Master Plan. The Trails Master Plan was adopted as part of the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan on '4,4•10, January 11, 1993. • The adopted plan described the route: "This trail follows the course of the Springbrook Creek from the city limits at SW 43rd Street north to the Black River Riparian Forest". • The trail is primarily a north/south route and generally follows the Springbrook Creek drainage in the valley area. Once completed, the trail will also connect to the existing regional Interurban Trail (asphalt paved trail) extending south to the City of Pacific and north to South Seattle. Additionally, the existing Green River Trail (asphalt paved trail) is connected to this system extending south to the City of Kent. • The City's 1993 Adopted Plan also noted: "A section of the trail already exists between SW 43rd and SW 34th Streets and that continuation of the trail could be accomplished through mitigation measures tied to development". • Since 1993, developers have constructed several sections of trail north and south of what existed at that time. • The attached map reflects three additional connections that can be developed either through mitigation as properties develop or through easement/acquisitions. H:\Leslie\IssuePaperSpringbrook Trail_I.doc Information Memo: Springbrook Trail Missing Link Page 2 of 4 September 6, 2006 • The Spring brook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank is comprised of five units, or parcels, totaling 130 acres. This land was either purchased or donated to the City by the Glacier Park Company. This Springbrook Trail Missing Link is located in Unit A. • Over the last two years WSDOT and the City have been working with the Bank Oversight Committee (BOC), a group of representatives from the various resource agencies, which primarily included the US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington State Department of Ecology, Environmental Protection Agency, and the US Fish and Wildlife Services. Numerous agreements relating to the creation, restoration and/or enhancement of the Bank, including allowances for constructing the Springbrook Trail have been executed. Construction 2006-2008: • WSDOT anticipates issuing the Notice to Proceed on October 30, 2006. The estimated completion date is Fall 2008. • The City is responsible for funding the design, construction, and maintenance of the trail. • The trail consists of a 1,400 linear feet, elevated, eight-foot wide boardwalk system with two seating areas and interpretive signage. The reduction in credits from the Bank due to the trail (0.89) credits will come out of the City's share of the credits in the Bank. Concepts utilizing a variety of construction materials were developed: o Early designs utilized wood-treated lumber exclusively. (Estimated cost $795,000). BOC members expressed concerns about the wood preservative leaching into the water and affecting salmon habitat. o The design was modified to utilize a combination of wood for decking and handrails, and plastic lumber for structural members located closest to the water table (estimated cost $1.3 - $1.5 million). The BOC determined that preservative-treated lumber would be too harmful to salmon. Permits would not be issued if any treated lumber was utilized in the design. o The final permitted trail design utilizes all plastic lumber for structural members, decking, and handrails. This design was included as an Alternate in the bid package that is currently being advertised. The bid opening is scheduled for September 20, 2006. • The trail construction cost is estimated to be $1,599,997 (including WSDOT construction administration), if the trail is constructed as part of the WSDOT Wetland Bank construction contract. • The Springbrook Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Project was advertised to bid on August 14, 2006, by WSDOT. The Springbrook Trail was included as an Additive Alternate. H:\Leslie\IssuePaperSpringbrook Trail_l.doc , Information Memo: Springbrook Trail Missing Link Page 3 of 4 September 6,2006 Nitr,,,. • If the City chooses to fund the trail construction as part of the Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Project, funding could be derived from the following sources: o Park Memorial Fund (Fund 131) $260,000 o Community Development Impact Mitigation Fund (Fund 303) $1,100,000 o Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 316) $239,997 • The City prepared 2007 budget requests identifying the above funding sources. • On August 25, 2006, the City mailed the attached cover letter, area map, and questionnaire to 500 businesses located within a V2 mile of the existing and proposed Springbrook Trail in order to gather more information on the current trail use, anticipated future use, and desire for added amenities. In addition, the aforementioned information was also posted on the City's web page for people to complete the questionnaire on-line. • In the future, a portion of the City's credits (beyond the 0.89 credit reduction for the trail) can be utilized to reimburse the above funds. There are a total of 45.12 credits in the Bank Project. The approximate value of a credit is $400,000. A portion of the City's credits will be available in approximately 2009 with additional credits available in future years as performance standards are met. o Note: WSDOT will receive the first credits released by the BOC to satisfy 'fir wetland mitigation requirements for WSDOT funded projects in the Bank service area, not to exceed 10 credits. The City will then receive the credits from subsequent credit releases by the BOC (after performance standards are met) until the City and WSDOT have equal shares, with the credit reduction for the trail included. • The City has 21 days after the WSDOT bid opening for the Bank construction contract (September 20, 2006) to decide to approve the funding necessary to include the trail construction in the Bank construction contract or to defer the trail construction to a later date. • Action by Council will be necessary at the October 2, 2006, Committee of the Whole meeting. Future Construction: • If the City chooses to not construct the trail as part of the Bank construction, the trail cost would not be included as part of the WSDOT Bank construction contract. The City will then be responsible to pay WSDOT up to an amount not to exceed $10,000 for administrative costs associated with removing the trail construction from the WSDOT Bank construction contract. • Options were added to the City of Renton/WSDOT Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Agreement that allows the City to contract with WSDOT to construct the trail at a later date while the trail permits are still valid (if not constructed as part of the Bank Project and once the Bank Project is complete). The City would be included as a co-permittee on the construction H:\LeslieUssuePaperSpringbrook Trai I 1.doc Information Memo: Springbrook Trail Missing Link Page 4 of 4 September 6, 2006 permits. In addition to increased construction costs to construct the trail at a later date, the City would also be responsible for committing City staff time and costs associated with advertising the project for construction, contract administration, construction project management, mobilization, etc. • The State permits are valid for five years and the Federal permits are valid for seven years after the Bank permits are issued. The trail will have to be re- permitted if not constructed during this timeframe. • If construction of the trail is delayed for a period of five years until after the Bank construction is complete and before the permits expire, the estimated total trail construction would be $2,135,046 (approximately $535,049 more). Conclusion: The Springbrook Trail was identified and adopted as part of the Parks and Recreation Open Space Comprehensive Plan and Trails Master Plan in 1993. The trail connects to a much larger trail system, affording people the opportunity to ride bicycles or walk a small loop trail or go south to the City of Pacific or north to South Seattle on the Interurban Trail. In addition, there is a connection to the City of Kent via the Green River Trail. All portions of the trail constructed to date have been completed as mitigation to development occurring along the creek, totaling$1,406,000 at today's cost for 2.1 miles. The Springbrook Trail Missing Link is located on City land and cannot be developed as mitigation by others. Over two years of discussions and negotiations have occurred between the City, ' WSDOT, and State and Federal regulatory agencies to realize the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Project—including the Springbrook Trail. While several of the regulatory agencies and the Tribe do not fully embrace the trail concept, the trail was permitted because of their greater support for the Bank. If the project is not completed as part of the Bank Project, the City runs the risk of regulatory agencies requiring additional mitigation. Constructing this Missing Link is a one-time opportunity where all parties have come to a formalized agreement and funding is available. Attachments C: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PBPW Administrator Peter Hahn,PBPW Deputy Administrator-Transportation Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Ron Straka,Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor Mike Bailey,FIS Administrator stag/ H:\Leslie\IssuePaperSpringbrook Trail_I.doc r` -. ,_es czo r CITY OF RENTON Y> ♦ ♦,� Community Services - Terry Higashiyama,Administrator i Kathy Keolker,Mayor Nationally Accredited Agency August 24, 2006 SUPREME HOME INSPECTIONS 901 SUNSET BLVD NE RENTON, WA 98055 Dear Renton Business Owner/Representative: The City of Renton Community Services Department, Park Division, is gathering information from neighborhood businesses regarding the City's Springbrook Trail system. The Springbrook Trail is located along Springbrook Creek from approximately SW 43rd Street north to the Black River Riparian Forest, which is located on the east side of Oakesdale Avenue, across from the Metro Sewage Treatment Plant. (Please see attached map). The trail constructed to date is paved, and has missing sections or"links." The City may have an opportunity to construct a portion of a missing link through a wetland area as part of a larger multi-agency project, utilizing an environmentally friendly boardwalk design. The long-range goal is to have a continuous trail system linking to the Interurban Trail that currently exists and extends south to the City of Pacific and north to south Seattle. low Your input is vital, and helps the City better understand trail use and knowledge in this area. We have enclosed a simple questionnaire for you and your employees to complete and return. Please feel free to make additional copies as necessary, as we would appreciate it if each of your employees has an opportunity to respond. We would like to have your comments returned to the City by Friday, September 8, 2006. In addition,the attached questionnaire is also available online for completion. Please click on the City's website at http://www.ci.renton.wa.us/, go to Community Services,then Parks. You will find the link directly under the Parks directory. Thank you in advance for completing this questionnaire. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Leslie Betlach, Parks Director, at 425-430-6619 or by e-mail at lbetlach@ci.renton.wa.us. Respectfully, 0 Leslie A. Betlach Parks Director Attachments Cc: Kathy Keolker,Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98057 RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE Ir r , ,......, . , 'a i- 'a ., . . ._ , . a .. .., .t .4,:, S .,.. i Seattle ' ..`` R E N TO IN Z t ,'., t 1 '4000 is µ t+�"4 , .z : r yw 3 . ' . , Boardwalk Missing Link: 5 4 Proposed connection through wetland. g ivi tw,etw -- ? .:: 4, i_Cti :'..-1,tr,41t.':`,7-4.'''!,. 'A. lit T ` ':. .if fid` Y i i.. t;s LEGEND. .e. 4 Missing Link _t Existing To Pacific ��Y O CO City of Renton a + Springbrook Trail Questionnaire This survey is intended for you and your employees. We hope to obtain the highest response possible. As such, we have enclosed several copies of this survey. Please feel free to make additional copies as needed, or contact our office and we will send additional copies to you. This survey is also available online at http://vwvw.ci.renton.wa.us. PLEASE CHECK 4 Z, 1. Are you the business owner or an employee? Owner Employee 2. Business Name: 3. How many employees are located at this business? 4. Are you aware there is a paved trail located on Yes No Springbrook Creek (see map on back)? ❑ ❑ 5. Do you utilize the trail? Yes No ❑ ❑ 6. How often? 1-2 times/wk 3-4 times/wk 5+ times/wk ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. What amenities would you like to see located on the trail? Picnic Area Seating Areas Restrooms Drinking Fountain ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other: El Signage: M(aa s Directional Distance Environmental 8. If you do not use the trail, are there reasons why? 9. If you would like additional information about this project or other Community Service events and/or projects, please include your email address or name and address. Email: Address: To ensure your response is included in our survey,please complete this questionnaire, and return in the envelope provided,by Friday, September 8,2006. Springbrook Trail Missing Link Photo Tour September 2006 • 'ti aim . t 10, e 451„ r .yam a y' .'3`va^ . _., S fi • 7.01111‘. • "/V71E111,4 * 4C4 • :,.:,......- z :::-*.:7*-:....-.:-.`,,,'. TO , \.\\. . . ' v'41,.,t•-- 1 '441111. q,- >. ', -..„ . - i , a • 61+. 1- - - I, ... ' 1 ......,.. f.... , ..,, '..., ) 1 ... ..„,...,. , ..,. I. I C . 4444 11•41rtg 1 , . To Seat l . 7------ \ _ _ . _ • e • - .IENTON ..., .... ,...„. , . _ ...... 2, , .s . , .. . . , , . s . , . ... ... ., ......., ..... ,, s ....„, ,. , .„ ,.... ... ,, ii ....(3, , ....„„ , .-2 _ 4,.... - .=1, Mt .4,-.0 -.'"'• q '''''' 0 44 Boardwalk Missing Link: / . , •,,,,,, •_. col c?.. Proposed connection through-vviWand. . 1 x a) „trot, .......- a) I ,....„ If Ilk ..... = , it 13 cr 03 „..,.. ,.„ ' 6,... - , , .. ___ , C . et ' le ' iS 1 ' = 17 ' 4 CD w e, 4,) ..... _ . LEGEND: , _....._ ,.......am Missing Link ____........ . somom Existing \t,„. IS, To Pacific . Revised,8130106 `f,ij "w t14, I ,.+ J %. } ev X71 • ;74- >= Photo#1 ` --- 4 ;J a r; Interurban Trail over 14:1Green River behind Fort Dent Park—Looking north f;40 tr4k. 401114- Photo#2 Manmade foot path between the Interurban Trail and Black River Riparian Forest under r. *�{ railroad trestles. Photo f ` taken behind Fort Dent Park looking northeast to '" MOM Black River y.. Photo#3 Entrance to Springbrook • • Trail from Oakesdale Avenue BtA�K I� P Ii OF RENTON- air • NINO Nair ''' p• ., Photo#4 4 " f Sprinbbrook Trail—Looking south to Oakesdale t Avenue. Kiosk constructed as part of an Eagle Scout =4. volunteer project. t z. z f ,j1 ♦tY v jA ' Photo#5 ' : ' Springbrook Trail under Oakesdale Avenue— .r Looking north to Black :. .; River Riparian Forest .,.4 • x%= Y Y e' ; * I " ' ' r„ Photo#6 1', _ Springbrook Trail entrance at Metro Sewage . . Treatment Plan near • Oakesdale Ave. and ,,:-,-,...:4„.4,,,,,,,,t. Grady Way '4- �; .4 til . . r?41 Photo#7 ' :—.--r- ' ;� Springbrook Trail at Illp r,. -.!'v-, s�,1,,,,:-ii,.,-:11,:,;:;: intersection of Oakesdale Avenue and It► Grady Way—Looking southeast � E*J�� t 1 t _ ^�•1. .1: i...1. ,ws � # Photo#8 '�' ' Springbrook Trail north of � SW 16th Street- Looking ryinorth under 1-405 { i 4 x - ter.= ., h: -rrY l5 . i f r . Photo#9 t, Springbrook j to Boeing TrainingTrail Facilityadacent and south of SiW 16th Street—Looking north to SW 16th Street i ,{ . : ''X- tea" r 1 � �s (,�. :1:. `r'itiiiiit'' �T s.• ,,,,,'".,.(::,=.,..'..,-,:......,. /- - r .7 .sem a :..T {a 'r!" 44 ..7.:5::,,,,..i.:„.."‘ 1w.f x "` • `_ :Z2,....:;., a Photo#10 =� .�-.,,,'.;7•x .' -", ! Springbrook Trail south of `440. '-hv . f = SW 16"'Street and east :, - of Oakesdale Avenue t { �ter` ' ,e. , . ` yam -,-.7-5.1%,,,,,-,9 �`^ c 3'!lr ':" -1/4: � am e Photo#11 Now End of Trail at SW 19th. � '; Lookingsouthwest across e Oakesdale Avenue t - ' ',-,,,„,4- Pe ,,--,-,N,7.,,,, +.�.� _ - ; ;44* v Photo#12 r Springbrook Trail — Looking north from SW 27th s Street. Trail ends at approximately SW 26th Street x 7'0,.-%,,-.•,,,----.•,-_�� aM t to "g" i",.', # Photo#13 { u; Springbrook Creek Wetland ' " ; '2, :.. -..., =;, Mitigation Bank and and location of missing trail link—Looking south from , 4:. ,,, SW 27th Street t' - '''''''l fin' i -, ,:=$.-., z., a,;�g * ' 's*. V' '1,'. "tom,' a 'l x, „,4',7meg_ 4 z v y e "3 a, a = ' i� Photo#14* y y ,,,10', ifs'i:':!.';\,,,,Ztrr".,: 4.;:„-1-'7,,',, ;.,c.,_ ..,_._. ".* ',,: , A I%,Nr.-‘_„..w.,„A 7, /t A, - �r, `- * - g Springbrook Trail terminus ' "� I. at approx. SW 30th Street. Z. k r= " •" A`- Looking north into �° "� *' Springbrook Wetland i Mitigation Bank and i location of missing trail link. i, ,,,,*4,,,. * , , f Photo#15 �' ,,,,,,,,:4; >',rasSpringbrook Trail looking •` Northeast at SW 34th Street ..,, ..... 4,-,,,,,,,,4, ,v aka. Y ... „ ,,,,,,. ,,,,,. .i.4 .. '.'''‘ - -- - * -‘ 1 - -- - ' •-•,,A.--r � Photo#16 ��, , C, ; • Springbrook Trail looking *fr< 1 * � ,'s' 4 ,,:!..i• r Northwest at SW 34th '; -` '41,' -,A*111 -5:=. - . ''''* : : ','•,. Street • et' -.4-47‘,..,,,,!--.: i _ 4.).,„,,--,--.. w, ;, • . + . M -:4-..:-,.',.,-.4,A.--..-,'-.. ,. ------ .c R.CL�ri.{S+t .F.u.:'x.i� w S v.. 2� _� . xf� V ,lar ' i Photo#17 < �� • Springbrook Trail-Looking South across SW 34th Street s a , ' ` a `' n Photo#18 Springbrook Trail located P between SW 34th and SW ' 41St Streets. Adjacent businesses have created k _• x ”m picnic areas and access Points i :� �• ;tea , • n s • sy�{�-� g�� ',"t:---:,\ •;,- :#" ,p)•,. .-„.„. LS -i•, --,-?..;:.:.;,--,„-,,,,,,',;= ' t .%, ' .a y- r ;.gyp+.'' ••..,'%'-'1``,.`ii-$4pk• ?ifte,„-', y = < ` "*,•iit-•-r-.:: f:.",-' „itfirt.4.,- 45, . , � `, Photo#19 . '''''','4.4` � Springbrook Trail at SW � � rte, . � �t 41St Street—Looking north f • ♦� ' . ' . . Photo#20 ,. 4r- , , a„ .. -. _. Springbrook Trail located between SW 41st and SW . .. z 43ro Streets—Looking _ . ;;. _,,it. .y southwest • - ...: ...'.t i way,.aSIbX. Photo#21 Springbrook Trail at SW 43ro Street—Looking north t • ° r` ' . w .411000 s� n .'•,".** }-x - �k$ ,,+ $ , S ` •,1 ,! Photo#22 1/4 ' � a Connection to Interurban ' °. ,s 4 Trail. Lookingeast toward 1 1 'a Vii; . ,, 14-b,r , '�' . , �- -' *4 I,, �_ - ..- SW 43�—Note trail . overpass a, ' 3 1,4 S ,,' r ! x t Ck4 .sy CC4a:D i.4,' a k kK �� � k Lt+mac-� i � Z ixxx Z.,. 4 -n E' Mil 11111 ,, Photo#23 ., Interurban Trail Bridge �� t -" over SW 43�d—Looking Nos !ii south. Trail extends to 6 City of Pacific. . .mac . Ti- t d, ,,rte. }' - . ' +,s'in .,l _� " ,e'l;,,g4 _ u,....,. : 1 . «.e.•, ,.'"= ... _ x .,..... _,- ,..z NIT "; 100% COST ESTIMATE SPRINGBROOK CREEK TRAIL.- (Plastic Decking& Railing with Plastic Wood Framing) SUB-TOTAL* SUB-TOTAL* ITEM TOTAL UNIT PRICE ITEM COST SECTION I-07.2(I) SECTION I-07.2(2) STD.ITEM NO. UNIT ITEM NO. QUANTITY OF STANDARD OF STANDARD SPECS SPECS I I 1 I SECTION:I PREPARATION 1 [UMP SUM SEE BELOW LUMP SUM 0001 L.S. MOBILIZATION 2 0.40 $4,500.00 $1,800.00 0025 ACRE CLEARING AND GRUBBING 3 10.00 $55.00 $550.00 0100 S.Y. REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4 35.00 $25.00 $875.00 0108 LF REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER __ SECTION:2 GRADING 5 33.00 $25.00 $825.00 0405 C.Y. COMMON BORROW INCL.HAUL 6 3.00 $100.00 $300.00 _ 0421 C.Y. GRAVEL BORROW INCL.HAUL 7 20.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 ? C Y. STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS B INCL.HAUL 1 i SECTION: 8 STRUCTURE 8 1.00 $901,678.00 $901,678.00 -L.S. BOARDWALK - 9 . SECTION:9 SURFACING 10 7.00 $100.00 $700.00 5085 C.Y. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE _ SECTION:17 EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING 11 1930.00 $6.00 $11,580.00 6374 L.F. COMPOST BERM 12 22.00 $7.50 $165.00 EA PSIPE OREGON ASH#1 CONT 18"HT 13 94.00 $4.20 $394.80 EA PSIPE RED-OSIER DOGWOOD,BR,12"-18" 16 110.00 $5.00 $550.00 EA PSIPE PEAFRUIT WILD ROSE,12"-18"HT.,BR 15 _ 11.00 $3.30 $36.30 EA PSIPE PACIFIC WILLOW,36 IN HT.,LIVE STAKE 1.5"DIAMETER Max. 14 94.00 $5.00 $470.00 r EA PSIPE SITKA WILLOW,36 IN HT.,LIVE STAKE 1.5"DIAMETER Max. SECTION:18 TRAFFIC - 17 35.00 $75.00 $2,625.00 6700 L.F. CEMENT CONC.TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER 18 112.00 $5.00 $560.00 6857 S.F. PAINTED CROSSWALK LINE SECTION:19 OTHER ITEMS 19 2.00 $100.00 $200.00 7041 EA _BOLLARDS 20 28.00 $50.00 $1,400.00 7055 S.Y. CEMENT CONC.SIDEWALK 21 16.00 $15.00 $240.00 7060 S.Y. ASPHALT CONC.SIDEWALK 22 1.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 7058 EACH CEMENT CONC.SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 1 23 1.00 _ $1,500.00 $1,500.00 7058 EACH CEMENT CONC.SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 2 24 1930.00 $3.00 $5,790.00 - L.F. HIGH VISIBILITY FENCE 25 400.00 $20.00 $8,000.00 7164 S.F. GRAVITY BLOCK WALL 26 2.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 7164 S.F. INTERPRETIVE SIGNS 27 4.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 - EA INSTALLATION OF OWNER SUPPLIED ITEMS 1_- $949,739.10 I_ - 1 Construction Subtotal(May 2005 Dollars)-Items 2 Through 285 I $949,739 2 Contingency for --_- - i - - --- g y I _ -- 00.0%of Line 1 $189,948 _ - ------I ----- ---- -------- 3 Subtotal of Lines_l and 2 1 - T- - $1,139,687 4 Mobilization - i_____ 8.0%of Line$ 1 ($91,175 -___ - -___ ___-___ _ _ 5 -Subtotal ofLines an oint of construction $1,292,405 6 Construction Administration-15/o of line 5on to mid _ _ _ ° -___-___ I '15%ifLine S $193,861 7 ISales Tax j i ;8.8%of Line W 5 1$113,732 frail Cast&4m°tt Ao°jCop7S°bmitta7 swrma yf Re°ro°72006s/s I47 Ialawe • ( (t. 4 ( ( 100% COST ESTIMATE SPRINGBROOK CREEK TRAIL- (Plastic Decking& Railing with Plastic Wood Framing) SUB-TOTAL* SUB-TOTAL* TEEM TOTAL UNIT PRICE ITEM COST SECTION I-07.2(1) SECTION 1-07.2(2) STD.ITEM NO. UNIT ITEM NO. QUANTITY OF STANDARD OF STANDARD • SPECS SPECS 8 Subtotal of Lines 5 and 6 1 $1,599,997 i 10 II CnttE,rcmarr Proof CopySabmlaalsummary fonmRenon 710 06s1s 2612 7/11/100* ,., ,..;-.•,,,,,,,...,:,,,,t.:',4';'::.,::\i ,,,,, , -\IIII ' ''.• -'- . 04''' -- „',..1.-', - *,-,,,e itt. --„ „ ...,,.,,,-A:44.1.--,.. : *..1 4- - ' ' . - -. r--t '',..•;',';,`\ .._ - •••'-,,,%%:.,,„`.......--„,„'„, ' "s. • . '.. ....„•,''cr 4,-4 r,'.4 \ , '''.4..7,-''•'• '-''',, • ,,,.„, •;,`„t".. :, , . ....- -'.. l'r,'•,"...-_,,,t•`i."-Ir,-',,,,,A•42 ' '. C'',,,,^P4'' t4,,:e,:,:.'• '., ,, 'ir,4:4-4:477:717iff ,04•''' iltr • °.,-. ',,.;,';,-1.1-‘, ,„ ••,,.....i.q.:,••,„---:vi-ii.,,,, ',.=' X.7;,-,--, ,i-4f 1,'...''..,).-i.:-.4"-:'4,.'„45.'7... - -, 1 ,4 , 1,-.,-,-.4,-- ,.-, ' '‘'`. .:-....nr,'''-‘ •••1 'i.-,t1-- iv- .----; \ ., • - .140* ... rr ' ‘ i r . , r , r i ....r r, . , r., gri : •... 11.1r .44 It\ NTON t„... \ RE - t - - , ,„.r.s., . t, . .. . ,.. , — - ... -, . ' L "••••••a itt I e .. . - To o'e -A... ,_•, , ... , .... +kw- - ,,,,,- - • ._ ,..,. ...-- -•--4,--; ,, s.,•,..!. s- , 46.... 4' A *, • 431 .._ .„ *.,t.PC.r-..a•..,•<*l•.• ,• , . ,., , *.,,cCciw—ahk,Y- ) • ..91 ... - Boardwalk a_,..MissingLink... : 7 Proposed connection throu9.n and. =4. sr) = I ccs ,.. CO Link .' Missing 1-111 > , e miss z , 1- - Existing W C ..-, : c (0 . _ I.. . Pacific LEGEND. -:,-, To --* *41.., Army Or �t City of Renton ' Springbrook Trail Questionnaire This survey is intended for you and your employees. We hope to obtain the highest response possible. As such, we have enclosed several copies of this survey. Please feel free to make additional copies as needed, or contact our office and we will send additional copies to you. This survey is also available online at http://www.ci.renton.wa.us. PLEASE CHECK 4 � 1. Are you the business owner or an employee? Owner Employee 2. Business Name: 3. How many employees are located at this business? 4. Are you aware there is a paved trail located on Yes No Springbrook Creek (see map on back)? ❑ ❑ 5. Do you utilize the trail? Yes No ❑ ❑ 6. How often? 1-2 times/wk 3-4 times/wk 5+ times/wk ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. What amenities would you like to see located on the trail? Picnic Area Seating Areas Restrooms Drinking Fountain ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other: I=1 Signage: Mas Directional Distance Environmental ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. If you do not use the trail, are there reasons why? 9. If you would like additional information about this project or other Community Service events and/or projects, please include your email address or name and address. Name: Email: Address: To ensure your response is included in our survey,please complete this questionnaire, and return in the envelope provided,by Friday, September 8,2006. Springbrook Trail Missing Link Photo Tour September 2006 w�,., 4,..�y 'rte +"M� { rt , x { a000ipaoo 1' a y { y y4 44 -4; 1 , ' 1 ..4 ... ti ' gir ''.., `..I.F 04$ I ‘ ,..i el • 1\ 1 • • t'..-. .. . N l* .fa -t# , „,... ,.. 1 i 2 f!.... -;,. ..,. ..:, .,. To-Seattle RENTON • .„ ,. :,.;,-• . .,.. , -1 . ---.,.:,._, - -::.i,u•,, - - '' ..... +ft ,.. *0"• \ b • , ......, -. k 4 i• . , Boardwalk Missing Link:\ _uk . 0 9)....3-. X , x Proposed connection'throughlivetiand. .,-,...... 1 111 V .. .,. 0 - C '- ...,, : . • • . 1,•V I 1 e 15 t • , .... . - . = 17 C WW I ,cp ..i.., ,i.... ! _ . LEGEND: -----..... .. Missing Link Zt - immmo• Existing ‘...,. f..5 . , To Pacific -- Revised 8130106 --4. 1 .`1 4; �4'ii r4.' 1 / yr > *Awe ; w Photo#1 • Interurban Trail over ; Green River behind Fort :; .-: !+ •w „,•-.4 f j / -� Photo#4 �,- Sprinbbrook Trail—Looking K i south to Oakesdale "' Avenue. Kiosk constructed as part of an Eagle Scout volunteer project. „ii _ f i - y • f fh; - - Photo#5 ;:-- 1 Springbrook Trail under Oakesdale Avenue— ,--- y Looking north to Black la •r • River Riparian Forest .Y,-,' .ate - z ... _ I i 0 {.a i$ • ,, rY E " a e •� ► Photo#6 r ' ' ki. ' 4'1,4 Springbrook Trail entrance "{ at Metro Sewage Treatment Plan near Oakesdale Ave. and 1 , rrr., Erxi ,;; -0 , Grady Way %nr+ • "'r✓ Photo#7 Springbrook Trail at intersection of Oakesdale Avenue and Grady Way—Looking southeast 5,1 t r � • ., .• :. Photo#8 Springbrook Trail north of SW 16th Street- Looking north under 1-405 • • Photo#9 Springbrook Trail adjacent 1 r i to Boeing Training Facility • and south of SW 16th Street—Looking north to _ SW 16th Street .1"4 '41rrr -,,,, •.-7._ *" •' ',i. ': gr,..0,1 ***7'4-• ,-..*4.,7"4- .Y--, `-. ... ' , ....-- •- - - `..‘)f...fro .,,,,,* -4114 - e.--, ,- ,:,2 ... --:4 -- - '4., ,.'' :--);:;.',1**-: r:e,;..,'` '• _.--.::'--..--.:.. .. " • %we L --....-Oir:. -:,- , , v•-..,.-&•• 1/4! r',,`,.,A 4 70' • - • li••• - '- Photo#10 --. „ ,,,• /- ,.-- , %IN.., - d ...:, : (°1,-. ,-_.,- --„, . --.--:. -,...:' •.: ..- • - --N, „, ip...- • . .0:,•.$7.)-;::',.0- 1.i,,,' . ., ' '''''.4''''''''' * ' ....'•. s''''. .* ': * •••.:7-- .":" Springbrook Trail south of _ ,,,-_-- -, -- -•-..4: .._ , .,',, -, - , SW 16th Street and east ' `.- - -.. ir,:::-4.;:: ... . . •;, . 7>'- .." - of Oakesdale Avenue , -' 1.' ' ' .7".. ;*,.447,1.7.,_, —"S;.*,V,,,,,„...r. '14, ,e,.... .' , ,--,,'Y.-1"7,'-• . ,-,..4.-- ,;,-,,•„Apr_,--,ite------., , _-,- --,.1 I.,- .„- - - , -,,, ...,..,, -40.---.,-., -.4- -.7 -- .4 . -----------,' • -..---- - -•••-:E-'rE, - - -7--7__ - • --..'i• :.. „„„....-.. _ ... , - - - - .- , . .... . Photo#11 Now - End of Trail at SW 19th. Looking southwest across Oakesdale Avenue - -: -..-,,,k- ' -',‘, -...••.•,;",,„'4-1 ...5.'"` -IA' ,,_ :,,,c'..- ier 1-',,,...-,.. „, ;,,,, .,,,., : ,,,, ,..,z,,,,,,,,, •-,c, ..-y,, ,s..,,,,,„4 .7-'''.,,, *,,'••,4,,,..'"'“. '. -1.,,71'‘'-4._;',05. ',L,4.I":'".,-P---..",',.-4.r.:14.-7-;:,.. ,...; ,.-._.'Va„."•'.7z: '::5;:,...' 'rf'r',`,,s.r,"-,"°- ...47., ',074,'-,2 - -,;.%.4,,,.14,v"- *-: ,',7,.‘,-,,,,,.4, '-'",-",%-1,.W4+;„,''W;,e;„'"-:.4c,.'",,,ki-.'.,,i,, --.4,,;4..t* -,..., •,. .§ e 4,.;ii.‘44klit---;-:. - :`-1 '— -:-,.t-•;`-'-'..'-...;*Yri#,:',,•!..1.: `1-st'.:qcer.,41. i,,,...4.11t4.',•,:w.'; -,...,,, w,,,,-- ..-.,k. • • ,.•' A.,t.,1,4"'..%.' .7-‘4.-. . "41'c7:. . . .,... ' 4:1V -*,cah''':•' .'''' . 441 Photo#12 , .$ ,- rte.-•* .4f.$ ,..,., Ii17, - -1,..„ Springbrook Trail - . ". Ay-,,,,--,,,, • . 1,. '• Looking north from SW 27th .1.•likN. Street. Trail ends at ,.,, ',..,:1:, 4i-i,"Y - • 414g- approximately SW 26th Street .., ..- , .41SoirAgillW 4,- + A MONOMII -ft- ; , '' i" 1. r, t.,. i .: Photo#13 Springbrook Creek Wetland r• _1; -.,-,, ...~ "w� =t ' Mitigation Bank and and v fk;. , location of missing trail .' ' x. - link-Looking south from .j ...., `-�-6••-. �y SW 27th Street t,.4 " $Tobi 4�'S��r�'R ,. � ''.ric. °'` + 1 t F ,,t, ". ,,_tat ' - �.f' ,I, is r -,"sr.-it .g. � , �, J ,. 7- ,"F, rc„,.7, ” .'* �`7,.....,..r..„,..,,,,-,;!,..4%..1-4-,,„T ,, e. ^`F R �. + � ?y b =+ 4.. � '� •r�� Photo#14 , i, ., _ •`',, ^ , -t.?,..`' Springbrook Trail terminus ►4,j ,; y +�. at approx. SW 30th Street. �� 1 I% Looking north into X �i f, ` =: Springbrook Wetland 1- Mitigation Bank and litame "" $" t` location of missingtrail link. ' x i ,, I '- r Photo#15 ... ,,� . , Springbrook Trail looking f'" Northeast at SW 34th Street fir+ t, {_ , 1,, ~� ve • ' z w�, ..°'A`".x ,.° t"-;'"`"" ,, : , •3`F" Qj ,q ^ae k`Y '`- .„ " Photo#16 t � #SCK Springbrook Trail looking pp. w Northwest at SW 34tH '''.•:- ..- t r k"t J Y- • ? i Street '-. v� x ....rte .:i � ��.."�- f..0 5 ; �;�o... ,....,. ,,wi _,c -t a �:.:r. ... g} bc°, Photo#17 % ;' Springbrook Trail - Looking 444111104yy^a#e r :: South across SW 34th Street -2 L s ' Ilk'a ''' ''''' ' 51141111,0,,,, r rr :r ,: r F Photo#18 - ;.. Springbrook Trail located "c between SW 34th and SW s 41St Streets. Adjacent ` buhea • s. 1•+ ►, picnic as andave accesscrted it,., ...: " , '- . ' points ' Kar X" • a� µ. •-. • X � `�+t "ala .N av F:.;ti ...f • • i,n j} 4 143 f V. {$ j' Y s7. Photo#19 • "' 's Springbrook Trail at SW 41St Street—Lookingnorth • Fes , • �y +i .-,. Photo#20 Int Springbrook Trail located between SW 41st and SW *ow - — - 43rd Streets—Looking southwest r �."'• :: Photo#21 Springbrook Trail at SW 43rd Street—Looking north 441110e . • 4 •+ a .,.. 'k j w ., 'ilk �. ,104 Ii ' Photo#22 .`IIdu "' Connection to Interurban Trail. Looking east toward ---,. SW 43rd—Note trail .t _ ;. overpass Y i�- __ ,_ t 3 �� �. mpillilliopo , t , -, '44:01;',*t - ., „, , ,..--1:_ ., i Photo#23 Interurban Trail Bridge ....._ ..�_...__ .w._..: ,,, - :_, . over SW 43rd—Looking ,e iii p ;ii south. Trail extends to In City of Pacific. Photo#24 Interurban Trail looking ,tii, =t '. North. Trail extends � t� '' r through Tukwila into Seattle. Trail also connects PYA wµ .. �« '°� i to the Green River Trail .s�y+�'+r,, 11,:,40. 0,4' : CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: �' Submitting Data: Community Services Department For Agenda of: September 11, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Parks Maintenance Division Staff Contact...... Leslie Betlach Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Amendment to Conservation Futures Interlocal Correspondence.. Cooperation Agreement between King County and the Ordinance City of Renton for Open Space Acquisition Projects Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business ➢ Issue Paper Study Sessions ➢ Amendment Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X.... Finance Dept....X.. Council concur. Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated 100,000 Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Accept the $100,000 from the King County Conservation Futures and authorize the funds to be placed in the Mitigation Fees Account (303.000000.000.3450.0085.00.000000) to receive the $100,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the King County Interlocal Cooperative Agreement Amendment. Reallocate the $100,000 from the Grant back to the Community Development Impact Mitigation Fund. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh (SY 0s COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • • ��N�0� MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: j Kathy Keolker, Mayor f . FROM: Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator'` STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Betlach, Parks Director' SUBJECT: Edlund/Korum Property/King County Conservation Futures Issue: Should the City of Renton accept the King County Conservation Funds for $100,000 toward the acquisition of the Edlund/Korum Property and sign the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement? Recommendation: The Community Services Department recommends that the City Council accept the $100,000 from the King County Conservation Funds by signing the Amendment to the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperative Agreement between King County and the City of Renton for Open Space Acquisition Projects and adjust the budget for the Mitigation Account. Background Summary: The City purchased the Edlund/Korum Property in 2004 for$1,225,000. The acquisition was funded with a King County Conservation Futures Grant for$250,000 and Mitigation monies of$975,000. The City of Renton applied for an additional King County Conservation Futures Grant in 2005 to assist in the acquisition of the Edlund/Korum Property. King County Conservation Futures awarded a grant to the City of Renton in the amount of$100,000 in 2006. In accepting the 2006 King County Conservation Futures Grant, the $100,000 can be re-appropriated back to the Mitigation Account for future acquisitions. C: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Mike Bailey, Finance Administrator Bill Rasmussen, Capital Projects Coordinator Itkor h:\human_se\gloria\betlach issue paper l.doc AMENDMENT TO THE CONSERVATION FUTURES INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROJECTS Preamble The King County Council,through Ordinance 9128, has established a Conservation Futures Levy Fund and appropriated proceeds to King County, the City of Seattle and certain suburban cities. This amendment is entered into to provide for the allocation of additional funds made available for open space acquisition. THIS AMENDMENT is entered into between the CITY OF RENTON and KING COUNTY, and amends and attaches to and is part thereof of the existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreement entered into between the parties on the 5th day of June, 1990, as previously amended. The parties agree to the following amendments: Amendment 1: Article 1. Recitals A paragraph is hereby added to the Recitals Section to provide for a Conservation Futures Levy Fund allocation for the Edlund Property acquisition, and hereafter reads: • On November 22, 2004 the King County Council passed Ordinance 15083, which ,,, ' appropriated a total of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000)in Conservation Futures Levy proceeds to the City of RENTON for the Edlund Property acquisition Project. On March 15, 2005 The King County Council passed Ordinance 15139, authorizing the King County Executive to enter into interlocal agreements with the City of Seattle and the suburban cities for the disbursement of Conservation Futures Funds in Ordinance 15083. Amendment 2: Article V. Conditions of Agreement Section 5.1 is appended to include Attachment G, which lists a 2005 Conservation Futures Levy Allocation for the Edlund Property Acquisition project. Amendment 3: Article VII.Responsibilities of County The first two sentences of this article are appended to include Attachment G, which lists a 2005 Conservation Futures Levy proceeds allocation for the Edlund Property acquisition Project: Amendment G Annual CFT Interlocal Renton-King County 2005 CFT proceeds -1- Subject to the terms of this agreement, the County will provide Conservation Futures Levy Funds in the amounts shown in Attachments A through G to be used for the Projects listed in Attachments A through G. The City may request additional funds; however, the County has no obligation to provide funds to the City for the Projects in excess of the total amounts shown in Attachments A through G. The County assumes no obligation for the future support of the Projects described herein except as expressly set forth in this agreement. In all other respects, the terms, conditions, duties and obligations of both parties shall remain the same as agreed to in the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement as previously amended. This document shall be attached to the existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, authorized representatives of the parties hereto have signed their names in the spaces set forth below: KING COUNTY CITY OF RENTON Ron Sims Kathy Keolker King County Executive Mayor Date: Date Acting under the authority of Acting under the authority of Ordinance 15139 Ordinance: Approved as to form: Approved as to form: NORM MALENG King County Prosecuting Attorney City Attorney fir+ Amendment G Annual CFI'Interlocal Renton-King County 2005 CFI'proceeds -2- ATTACHMENT G 2005 CONSERVATION FUTURES LEVY CITY OF RENTON ALLOCATION Jurisdiction Project Allocation RENTON Edlund Property $100,000 TOTAL $100,000 Project Description: Edlund Property: This project consists of an 18-acre former farm that will become a passive- use open space. The project is located on the Northeast corner of Carr Road and 103rd Avenue. The property is not located in a zoned agricultural production district, but it contains open fields with a house and two barn structures. CFT funds will not pay for these three buildings and they are not part of the project scope. City of RENTON—Edlund Property $100,000 Amendment G Annual CFT Interlocal Renton-King County 2005 CFF proceeds -1- CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL 161501 AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: September 11, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Acceptance of right-of-way dedicated to the City of Correspondence.. Renton from Fry's Electronics (Dash 80, LP), Ordinance at Garden Ave. N. and N. 8th St. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Deed of Dedication Study Sessions Legal Descriptions Exhibit Map Information Vicinity Map Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Area to be dedicated is required for additional right-of-way to increase the turning radius for truck movement at Garden Ave. N. and N. 8th St. as part of the South Lake Washington Roadway Improvement Project, CAG-06-068. Acceptance of the right-of-way dedication will allow the City to proceed with the improvements in this area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the additional right-of-way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and record the Deeds of Dedication. I:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2006U.anding-Fry's Electronics 11.1m AGNBILL.doc 1 fir✓ Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 DEED OF'DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 082305-9217 Project File II: Street Intersection: Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. DA 5li - ' , t-p 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation LEGAL,DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or_lid!legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) NW i%,Section 8,Twp. 23 N..Ree. 5 E,W.M.,City of Renton. King County, Washington The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as ',tor named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Appro -,and Acce:ted Bv:- Ge•ntor(s): .. Grantee(s): City of Renton i., _..4.,.. A -MND 1:51 I';L , r ct _ (--- Kathy Keolker, Mayor h m.,.-Le ;t if U . Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk 1'r rv/ INDJ 1Ot,1L FORA!Or STATE OF ` )SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF e ) I certify that I know or ifivisatisfactory evidence that . fr'G Icy r Notary Seal must be within box Jild19IP!r signed this instrument and •• acknowttrdged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 'tom " 4� ataiy Public i :r d for the State of -liclJ i neer, Notary(Print)' i,: /� My appointment expires:krgivrAer, 1�2c /Q • Dated: C:Colson/F Page I FORM 07-15-05 err P.CASiRRltD , Corninlaion# 1639929 , ioioty Public•California '` ` ; Sara CWro Cou'* . MyComm.f IwsJan26.201f • 11110 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. GVDIVIDIJAL FORM OF:ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS • COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that • signed this instrument and • acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENT:-I TI VE FORM OF ACKNOs"L EDC3IENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and • acknowledged it as the and '44610 of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) • On this day of , I9_,before me personally appeared • to me known to be of the corporation that • executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. • • • • • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: C:Colson/Form-DEED-Corp.Doc\C Page 2 FORM 07-I5-05 �lrr►' Project: Exhibit A wO# PID • Legal Description GRANTOR: • • Street: GARDEN AVENUE NORTH DEDICATION • • ALL THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE ••• OF WASHINGTON,LYING WITHIN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • • BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF •• RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5535459,THENCE S89°28'22"E • ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 56.38 FEET; THENCE N00°25'55"E A DISTANCE OF 0.35 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A RADIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 52.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15°00'04",AN ARC LENGTH OF 13.61 FEET; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE N44°06'18"W A DISTANCE OF 52.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT,THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N76°21'26"E; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE,HAVING A RADIUS OF 52.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°53'40",AN ARC LENGTH OF 13.52 FEET; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE N06°39'21"W A DISTANCE OF 32.95 FEET; THENCE S83°20'39"W A DISTANCE OF 0.24 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH; THENCE S00°29'31"W ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 85.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 1,158 SQ.FT.+1- ,' 11,1/ej„ • • • C:Colson/Form-DEED-Cory.Doc\C Page 3 FORM 07-15-05 `OWY 1 Map Exhibit I I PARCEL NO. 082305-9217 DASH 80 LP • `S83'20'39"W �( 0.24' 30' la z I N 1(''''v I z 0 '. e----tivN is 0 l' 1 ui a d=14 53'40" R=52.00' SCALE 1" = 20' LU , - L=13.52' C) 0 er —N-76.21-26"E�R� Ca k 1 Ti 270. DEDICATION 0 '8 AREA (1,158 SF t) Os r?� 4=15 00'04" c3• R=52.00' I S LINE NW 1/4 L=13.61' N SECT 8-23N-5E S89'28'22'1- \ 56.38' ! N00'25'S5"E POINT OF BEGINNING 0.35' I OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION N 8TH ST MON IN CASE W/ U 1COPPER PIN AT STREET INTERSECTION C:Colson/Forw-DEED-CoIp.Doct C Page 4 FORM 07-15-05 FRY 'S _ A Pv`w!e Noc G�r6Ar yd . do o .. 4i+o 'bnuany Kj$d • I— f..::::' IPPII.,.....:777,1,"1. .---..... Z +7 ''?• \ ...• •6 • i CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: r Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: September 11, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Acceptance of right-of-way dedicated to the City of Correspondence.. Renton from Fry's Electronics (Dash 80, LP) at Garden Ordinance Ave. N. and N. 10th St. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Deed of Dedication Study Sessions Legal Descriptions Exhibit Map Information Vicinity Map Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Area to be dedicated is required for additional right-of-way to construct street improvements and a traffic signal at N. 1061 St. and Garden Ave. N. as part of the South Lake Washington Roadway Improvement Project, CAG-06-068. Acceptance of the right-of-way dedication will allow the City to proceed with the improvements of this roadway. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the additional right-of-way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and record the Deeds of Dedication. I:\P1anReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2006\Landing-Fry's Electronics I Im AGNBILL.doc • Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 082305-9217 Project File#: Street Intersection: Reference`umber(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. DASH- - •5C' L..P 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) NW 1/4 Section 8,Twp. 23 N.,Rge. 5 E, W.M.,City of Renton.King County, Washington . The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as • `fir" named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. • Aper and Ac vied Bv: s, Gra tor(s): ) Grantee(s): City of Renton Pf A N. '-';. s.,,t ..,,a,.../ ,,,,,,,,;(33.---t—,_ 131 i .r-cl S.ett Kathy Keolker,Mayor Z-{5 IA a-61 a&r Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM of STATE OF 101:74 1 )ss ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF-14 FGSc,AZI I certify that I know ortsrtisfactory evidence that 17/4' 4 etr'cI Notary Seal must be within box 6;41 e r signed this instrument and acknowl4ed it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument./ �' d /. J ff tet, • otary Public it .nd for the State ofd C.41;1&-nit cg Notary(Print)' R t // My appointment expires: ,vc,4.cy Cy 2%2 D Dated: C:Colson/FPage 1 FORM 07-15-05 Nisr RICHARD a A Nr :i CornmiMlon!1639920 s 1- - •.; way Public-Calkento `.. l 2o61a pow Cotulh► *Cann, Jan 201 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. • • !NO/L1DU,4L FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and `44/10 of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING • On this day of , 19 ,before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrment,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free • and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein • mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington • Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: C:Colson/Fonu-DEED-Corp.Doc1 C' Page 2 FORM 07-15-05 Nod Project: Exhibit A WOit P ID Legal Description GRANTOR:GRTOR: Street: GARDEN AVENUE NORTH DEDICATION ALL THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING, STATE • OF WASHINGTON, LYING WITIIN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,TOWNSHIP 23 • • NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5535459,THENCE N00°29'31"E ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 253.35 FEET;THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 910.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18°30'01"AN ARC LENGTH OF 293.83 FEET;THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE N18°00'30"W A DISTANCE OF 352.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING,CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN N18°00'30"W A DISTANCE OF 167.57 FEET;THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY MARGIN N68°32'59"E A DISTANCE OF 8.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNtING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N73°1 t'50"E;THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE,HAVING A RADIUS OF 36.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75°33'33"AN ARC LENGTH OF 47.48 FEET;THENCE NON-TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE S18°08'48"E A DISTANCE OF 64.67 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- 'NNW TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS S33°12'58"E;THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE,HAVING A RADIUS OF 36.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75°41'52"AN ARC LENGTH OF 47.56 FEET;THENCE RADIAL TO THE PRECEDING CURVE S71°05'l0"W A DISTANCE OF 3.50 FEET;THENCE SI0°53'46"E A DISTANCE OF 32.94 FEET;THENCE S79°06'14"W A DISTANCE OF 0.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 3,391 SQ.FT.+1- 1,ASN) C:Colson/Form-DEED-Cai .Doc\C Page 3 FORM 07-15-05 *011110/. Map Exhibit \ \ \\ \ PARCEL NO. 082305-9217 \ DASH 80 LP 30' N68.32'5 \ 30 '8.33' _ \ N73i1,50"EC ) fel : 0033\ \\ „ DEDICATION • AREA • \ (3,391 SF ±) \ s cI z 1 o , o \ -5;' --.1. -Z- \ nr%\\ ! v \ ry mow. ---A\.. m a '? cr��\ n \ a a \ \ /A571,3 50,"W 4 , moo N • p O ,{:rn 1 ;p , Pi —4476'.4.;;14 — vo-n 06'14'W �- \ :: o� S79 0.63 1 \ oz z %z \ SCALE 1” = 30' o� \ z \, i C:Colsou/Form-DEED-Corp.Doc1 C Page 4 FORM 07-15-05 ... ... .• ..... . . .- . . . .. .„ ,..• .„ .• - .-,••'----,.• . .. . . . . . „.: ,... .-. , ,• • • .. : -: ......-.. VICINITY MAP . . . . . . .. • . . .. .. •.• . .• . . •••• -.. : .. ..- .. • . . .• .• ... . . r.., --,.........: .....• ...:- ..:.: ....::* ....: ::: .:• --: .•-•' --::. / ::.. ..,- .--- :-..• ...:' .••• --.,: .$ ,:••••::: ,..!- ....•••Th, 1 --.•:-: :.... --.1.,,......e ..- ..., . ,-.:.,. .,-,.‹, .:.:' s, • •-:..... •••• f.,. ...." .: ..• ,..-... .. . .. •: . . . . ...... . ... 1: ,,,,,..•:. ... - .• ..- , .•.......,. .. . • .. - - -• :,.. •::: ...-- .: •-,..• ... • ' •-••••••• ....: i• --::.„.... t . . . ...... •• •.• .• .::,... .. / .- .• .. -::... • , ..c • „ .• ,., %.*•• • .. •.. •,•. i--z..:••, i': •.:' ... stce' .-: .-•o • . . . . . . . . . :.„, :„.• :, -.! t tr. 1. ..-..tect ...,. .-. .-.-* 9, „...,:: , .,..... ..... i V -. • — . .. .. . .„. ... :... ...' :' ' • • . ."....„..:;*; •:. .: _::' ,:: :'... ::: ::: ,..-••,.... •... I -ri -< .• -:. i .. .:-.... .,/...-:: f -':::•. ::: i: ..:: (i) .., ..., .--:-•I ..., ::. .: ..... .: I.- .: . •... , . .. . , . ..:.: ::'. ::.if•ttitth 8th ttieit.,.. • •. • . ... . .. .. ..-••:: .: .:' ".... '-'•:. ;..:. .:: .[...''''''.. . -..,. .. -• • .• .- 'et .::. .1: F.: .:. .,.. • ... .*:•,,..: 1 . :...... ;:-.,.... ..1: ..,.". ...." •.''''' .!.':.-''' . .. ::... ..-.. .: I Nillire :.:. '''';• :..... f ,:::,:......" F r CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL 1 AI#: ,,, Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: September 11, 2006 Dept/DivBoard.. Development Services Division Staff Contac t Juliana Fries x:7278 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. ASPENWOODS FINAL PLAT Correspondence.. File No. LUA 06-025,FP (LUA 04-143, PP) Ordinance X 8.2 acres located at the east side of Hoquiam Ave NE Resolution and south of NE 10`}'Street. Old Business Exhibits: New Business 1. Resolution and legal description Study Sessions 2. Staff report and recommendation Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment 1/41iiii Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: The referenced final plat is submitted for Council action. Aspenwoods Plat divides 8.2 acres into 46 single-family residential lots with water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, street lighting, curb and gutter, sidewalks and street improvements. Design and construction of utilities, lighting and pavement will be approved, accepted or deferred(and a security device posted) as required through the Public Works Administrator prior to recording the plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat will be met prior to recording of the plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution approving Aspenwoods Final Plat, LUA 06-025, FP, with the following conditions: a) All mitigation fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. b) All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of the City staff prior to the recording of the plat. c) The Restrictive Covenants for a Native Growth Retention Area established under recording Number 9901190220 to King County(and the City of Renton as the successor to King County upon annexation) shall be abandoned and released prior to 111111111 recording the final plat. • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF 1'H.E CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING FINAL PLAT(ASPENWOODS; FILE NO. LUA-06-025FP). WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is proper and advisable and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and Noimor recreation, playgrounds, schools, schoolgrounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The final plat approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth (The property, consisting of approximately 8.2 acres, is located in the vicinity of *iv Hoquiam Avenue NE, south of NE 101 Street) 1 RESOLUTION NO. is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton, and .4400 subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated August 14, 2006. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Niati Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1206:8/16/06:ma 2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY FILE NO. 4268-675475 PARCEL A: LOTS 1 AND 2 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. L99S0007, ACCORDING TO SHORT PLAT RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 2003 UNDER RECORDING NO. NO. 20030219900003, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 44111x►" PARCEL B: LOT B OF KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L99L0022, ACCORDING TO SURVEY RECORDED JANUARY 6, 2000 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20000106900008, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 4'tlrr' \41 z 7 Q \ J NE 10TH ST J NE 9TH STcn . I • _1 r� SE 120TH ST VICINITY MAP ,4410.9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF RENTON STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS APPLICANT: Maher Joudi Aspenwoods Final Plat. File: LUA 06-025FP LOCATION: East side of Hoquiam Ave NE and South no NE 10th Street. Section 10,Twp. 23 N.,Rng 5 E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Final Plat for 46 single-family residential lots with water, sanitary sewer, storm, street and lighting. RECOMMENDATION: Approve With Conditions FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1) The applicant, Maher Joudi, filed a request for approval of Aspen Woods, a 46-lot Final Plat. 2) The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit No. 1. 3) The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Determination on Non-Significance-Mitigated on December 28 2004 for the subject proposal. 4) The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5) The subject site is located at the east side of Hoquiam Ave NE and south of NE 10th Street. The new plat is located in Section 10, Twp. 23 N.,Rng 5 E. 6) The subject site is comprised of 3 parcels totaling 8.2 acres. 7) The Preliminary Plat (LUA-04-143) was approved by the City of Renton Council on April 4, 2005. 8) The site is zoned Residential 8 DU/AC(R-8). Noir 9) The Final Plat complies with both the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. 10) This site is subject to a Native Growth Retention Area (NGRA) Covenant recorded under Recording Number 9901190220 and later modified to the boundary shown in King County Short Plat L99S0007 and recorded under Recording Number 20030219900003. King County was the original holder of this Covenant and the City of Renton, as the successor to King County, became the holder of this Native Growth Retention Area (NGRA) Covenant upon its annexation of territory encompassing this parcel by Ordinance No. 5096. The Native Growth Retention Area (NGRA) Covenant was established for the purpose of dispersing and treating stormwater flows and was subject to restrictions applying to vegetation removal. The release of this Native Growth Retention Area (NGRA) Covenant was conditioned upon the review and approval of a new drainage or site plan by King County's Department of Development and Environmental Services or its successor. The Aspenwoods Preliminary Plat was approved and a drainage system designed per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual has been installed and the condition which permit the termination of the covenants has been achieved. 11) The Preliminary Plat was subject to a number of conditions as a result of both environmental review and plat review. The applicant complied with the conditions imposed by the ERC: a The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the "Geotechnical Engineering Study"dated September 21, 2004, regarding site fir' preparation and structural fill material. The applicant complied with the condition during construction and utility work. b The applicant shall prepare and submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP)pursuant to the standards of the Department of Ecology and a Construction Mitigation Plan. Development Services staff shall review both plans prior to issuance of Construction Permits. The applicant/contractor shall comply with the approved plans to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project's construction. The project design and construction complies with the DOE requirements for Erosion and Sediment Control. c The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site. Weekly Erosion Control Inspection Reports have been prepared by Northwest Erosion Control. According to the reports, maintenance of erosion control measures have been provided at the site. d Certification of proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to the recording of the final plat. Certification of proper removal of erosion control facilities will be provided prior to recording of the plat. 2. The applicant shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Level 2 flow control) and water quality improvements. The project complied with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and provided flow control Level 2—for detention and basic water quality. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $530.76(44 x 530.76 = $23,353.00)per new single-family lot. The fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat. The Parks Mitigation Fee will be paid prior to recording. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00(44 x 9.57= 421 x$75.00 = $31,575.00)per each new additional trip generated by the project with credit given for the two existing single-family residences, prior to recording of the final plat. The Traffic Mitigation Fee will be paid prior to recording. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$488.00 (44 x$488.00 =21,472.00)per new single-family lot with credit given for the two existing single-family residences, prior to the recording of the final plat. The Fire Mitigation Fee will be paid prior to recording. 11. In addition, the applicant has complied with the conditions imposed as a result of Preliminary Plat: 1. The applicant shall comply with the ERC conditions. fir► The applicant complied with the ERC conditions noted above. 2. The applicant shall create a half street westerly from the stub end of Kitsap to the further enhancement of the grid system. The plat has been revised and the design includes a public half street westerly from the stub end of Ilwaco Ave NE (previously named as Kitsap Ave NE) to the boundary of the site. 3. The Fire Department will have to approve the turnaround design of Kitsap and Proposed Lot 17 will not be able to be developed until Kitsap provides an appropriate outlet. The development restriction for Proposed Lot 17 shall appear on the face of the plat. The Fire Department has reviewed and approved the turnaround on lot 17. Applicant noted on the face of the plat the restriction for development on lot 17. 4. The applicant shall be required to show the access easements `A" and "B" as easements across Lots 7, 8, 17, and 18 accordingly prior to the recording of the final plat. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager. The applicant noted on the face of the plat(under Easement Provisions)that lots 7, 8, and 9 shall have access from easement 'A'. The access easement for lots 17 and 18 is no longer necessary since a public street has been installed fronting these lots(see HEX condition No. 2). S. The applicant shall be required to place a note on the face of the plat requiring access for Lot 7 to be from access easement 'A"and Lot 17 to be from access easement "B". Additionally, no direct access from any lot within the plat shall be allowed onto Hoquiam Avenue NE. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager, prior to the recording of the final plat. The applicant noted on the face of the plat that access to lot 7 shall be from easement 'A'. The note for access for lot 17 is no longer necessary since a public street has been installed fronting the parcels would share the access easement with lot 17. In addition a note has been placed on the face of the plat indicating that no access is allowed onto Hoquiam Avenue NE from any lot within the Aspen Woods plat. 6. The applicant shall be required to install a "Private Road"sign with addresses being served from the private drives at the intersections of the private roads and the proposed 42 foot wide internal public street,prior to the recording of the final plat. The required street signage and addresses from private driveways will be provided prior to recording the final plat. 7. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the final plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for all shared improvements (landscape Tract B, access easements, stormwater Tract A) of this development. A draft of the document(s) shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the final plat. A Homeowners Association was created and the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions was reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and the Development Services, and includes the referenced maintenance responsibilities. 8. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and complete all inspections and approvals for all buildings located on the property prior to the recording of the final plat. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager. All buildings located within the project limits have been removed and the demolition permits are finaled. 9. The applicant shall comply with the conceptual street tree plan with the following changes: the proposed Koleruteia paniculata (Golden raintree)shall be replaced with a similar type and size tree to be a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches(deciduous) or 6-8 feet in height (conifer). The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager and shall be planted prior to final building permit inspection. The applicant will comply with the conceptual street tree plan with the changes approved by the City prior to final building permit inspection. 10. The applicant shall be required to have all drainage facility maintenance agreements and easements ready to record,prior to the recording of the final plat. The drainage easements and maintenance agreements have been recorded. 11. The applicant shall be required to install a sight obscuring landscape/fencing buffer along the western and northern sides of the detention facility (Tract A). This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to final plat approval. The applicant submitted fencing and landscape plans and the sight obscuring landscape/fencing buffer will be installed along the western and northern sides of the detention facility(Tract"A"), unless deferred by the Administrator. 12. The applicant shall provide a Certificate of Water Availability, showing that the District's system can provide a minimum of 1,000 gpm of available fire flow per fire hydrant. The submittal of the certificate shall be required at the time of the construction plan for review and approval of Development Services Division. The developer has provided a letter of water availability from Water District No. 90. CONCLUSIONS The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat process and therefore should be approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: "'sim' 1. The City Council should approve the Final Plat with the following conditions: a) All plat fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. b) All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff prior to the recording of the plat. c) The Restrictive Covenants for a Native Growth Retention Area established under recording Number 9901190220 to King County (and the City of Renton as the successor to King County upon annexation) shall be abandoned and released prior to recording the final plat. SUBMITTED THIS 14th DAY OF AUGUST,2006 JULIANA FRIES bEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION cc: Kayren Kittrick LUA-06-025-FP 'y1110r w \��c� z J CI NE 10TH ST / 1 NE 9T ST w / / N Car , _ SE 120TH ST co • s VICINITY MAP 1%4300' Now LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY FILE NO. 4268-675475 PARCEL A: LOTS 1 AND 2 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. L99S0007, ACCORDING TO SHORT PLAT RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 2003 UNDER RECORDING NO. NO. 20030219900003, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOT B OF KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L99L0022, ACCORDING TO SURVEY RECORDED JANUARY 6, 2000 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20000106900008, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. '+hmrr ....m. ASPEN WOODS A POR110N OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE 5E1/4,SECTION 10,TYR 23 N.,ROE.5 E.WM. OVERALL PLAT PLAN(NOT TO BE RECORDED) _ I . Mi, n, w, lo. x. N1 I 1 2 3 4 5 s.jso rt. ....7, 8 I 107305.34 I I 9 I cow son I 1.1/PNIC scms . - Z-023039372 I —.-... ...'.-... ..........."...., 0.M SP, o •--,7-17----7-1--::', \ 11 I •I''''''''' ----- 5,647 SP, 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 1 I .°'''4'r ken,SP, ,,,,,,., ,,,,,,a„ s,mo so, 6.3.•SO,. S.344 see, Ins so Fr I - I I i 12 1021059293 )i \IFET6CESM157% J I 13 S./73 SCI, 37 36 35 34 33 32 3129 30 Lan 3a er I W PIM!O!. 4.712 Sp er 4.,.,2 s,,, 340 SP, 3.346 5/1, P.M SP, S.>.san S,NS SO, I I .\_ Z S CP.R4P MP '..:,:''''''Pfg.'1. 0, La • 0,077 Sa, 811 C.- --...: si"'AM?,•P M I NE81H . .PL 5 0. ,,,, 1 ,>: RIC NG xoo,P0301070 ,./.:,P.,1, 702303921S .. ... .,......co... - ...._..... ... 0 S1019,91 /- -------.._-------------------..., 0. 58•19 19, A'.i , .. ... .20..r,I ..,22, 2 5 26 SF:70,000,0,o 24 ,....„ 27 28 1 ,.., .2,r. ,„.23v, I I TRACT A . )i I 17 I I I °•"'""7 11 , 19 18 I icp3059003 10230S92•41 SAP1 SP, SA"1.2, I 1 15 71' )/ I I li -.-- I I -7 ',-- 16 .. ..... . .... ip230S9405 NE 6TH ST A JAW cp,n.,1i,,,,.„, STRONG ..9=*.%: ':;,,‘ .r.44,4A, MN It1.•NM.Ma SRI e ....ow - I.NM an64.0 ' 'Nat.. • CTC OF RENTON LAND USE ACTON i LUA-06-025-FP OTT OF PENTON UM RECORD I 550-10-042*550-10-042* SHEET 1 Y 1 (.. . (... CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: ,(1 Submitting Data: For Agenda of: September 11, 2006 Dept/DivBoard.. EDNSP Staff Contact Alex Pietsch x6592 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Add incoming revenues from The Boeing Company and Correspondence.. Harvest Transwestern Lakeshore to the 2006 Budget. Ordinance X Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Ordinance Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $37,690 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted 0 Revenue Generated $37,690 Total Project Budget 0 City Share Total Project0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City has three contracts with Blumen Consulting Group for Boeing Plant Sub-District 1A and 1B consistency analysis work and subsequent appeals. This ordinance provides documentation for the budget to receive funds from The Boeing Company and Harvest Transwestern Lakeshore to cover expenses under these three contracts(CAG-06-009-1-06, CAG-06-010-1-06, and CAG-06-009-2-06). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the ordinance to amend the budget to reflect these amounts. H:\EDNSP\CouncilUssue Papers-Agenda Bills-Cue Reports\2006\Agenda Bill-Ordinance to Amend Budget-The Landing.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2006 BUDGET BY REFLECTING INCOMING REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,610 FROM THE BOEING COMPANY AND $33,080 FROM HARVEST TRANSWESTERN LAKESHORE TO COVER EXPENSES AMOUNTING TO $37,690 FOR CONTRACTS WITH BLUMEN CONSULTING FOR BOEING PLANT SUB-DISTRICT 1A AND 1B CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS WORK AND SUBSEQUENT APPEAL. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Appropriation in the General Governmental Fund is hereby increased as follows: Fund 2006 Budget 2006 Original Increase Adjusted `o Budget Budget R000.000000.000.3450.0084.00.000002 $40,725 $37,690 $78,415 E000.000000.005.5190.0090.41.000002 $57,300 $37,690 $94,990 Source of funds: $4,610 from The Boeing Company and $33,080 from Harvest Transwestern Lakeshore SECTION H. Funds for these line items are hereby added to the 2006 budget. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk "err 1 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1281.8/15/06:ma 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al#: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: .*' Dept/Div/Board.. Finance& IS Department September 11, 2006 Staff Contact Michael E. Bailey Agenda Status Finance/IS Administrator Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Resolution to Donate Surplus Computer-related Ordinance Equipment Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Each year the City surpluses computer-related equipment that was replaced during the City's annual replacement program. Recycling of old computers and other dated technology equipment for continuing use is the preferred method of disposal provided the City can do so without additional workload or cost. Donation to a non-profit organization that serves or benefits the public is in accordance with RCW 39.33.010. A non-profit organization, The Bit Bank, will pickup the City's surplus equipment at no cost to the City. They will refurbish the equipment, and recycle it back to low income, elderly or disabled individuals and non-profit organizations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution to donate surplus computers and other dated technology equipment. H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\01_AgendaBills\Resolution to donate surplus computer equip_Aug'06.doc G�(cY O FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES • ® , DEPARTMENT - >Nr-r0� MEMORANDUM DATE: August 18, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: u Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Michael E. Bailey, FIS Administrator STAFF CONTACT: David Tibbot, IS Manager SUBJECT: Donation of Surplus Computer-related Equipment ISSUE Should the City donate surplus computers and other dated technology equipment to a non-profit organization to be refurbished and given to the low income and disabled community? iry RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a Resolution to donate surplus computers and other dated technology to The Bit Bank, a non-profit organization. BACKGROUND Each year the City surpluses computers replaced during the City's annual computer replacement program. Commercial services are available to recycle computers; however, the standards for recycling this technology are often expensive. Also, the recycling standards for technology that is no longer viable has become increasingly onerous; as environmental regulations change to adapt to the dumping of hazardous materials contained in electronic boards. Recycling of computers and other dated technology equipment for continuing use is the preferred method of disposal, provided the City can do so without additional work load or cost. The Bit Bank is a non-profit organization that will pickup surplus computers, refurbish them and put them back into the community at no cost to the City. Documentation of The Bit Bank's non-profit status follows. DT/drl Enclosure: Secretary of State Registration Detail regarding The Bit Bank h:\finance\adminsup\02_issuepapers_memos to council or mayor\memo re resolution to donate computers_aug 2006.doc milk Corporations: Registration Detail Page 1 of 2 SrcoRpoF it (ate Corporations Menu • Print Page Enter Keywords Se Corporations Division - Registration Data Search THE BIT BANK UBI Number 602 385 847 Category Regular Corporation Profit/Nonprofit Nonprofit Active/Inactive Active State of Incorporation WA Date of Incorporation 04/12/2004 License Expiration Date 04/30/2007 Registered Agent Information Agent Name MICHAEL VORKAPICH Address 1100 HIATT CT City SULTAN State WA ZIP 98294 Special Address Information Address City State Zip « Return to Search List Dm Informatisclaiionerin the Secretary of State's Online Corporations Database is updated Monday through Friday by 5:00 a.m. Pacifi *411111°Time(state holidays excluded). Neither the State of Washington nor any agency,officer, or employee of the State of Washi http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=THE+BIT+BANK&ubi=6023... 8/16/2006 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE DONATION OF SURPLUS COMPUTER- RELATED EQUIPMENT AND PRINTERS. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has a variety of surplus computer-related equipment and printers from the 2005 /2006 computer replacement program(Surplus Equipment); and WHEREAS, other City departments have been offered the use of this equipment, with none indicating a need for it; and WHEREAS, the storage space, funds, and the time required to maintain and track this surplus computer-related equipment are limited; and WHEREAS, the expense of public funds required for City staff to prepare the subject computer-related equipment for sale or proper environmental disposal exceeds the value to the Surplus Equipment; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City and the general public to dispose of this property in the most advantageous terms available to the City and the environment; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has received a request for donation of surplus computer equipment from the non-profit organization, The Bit Bank, Inc. of Sultan, Washington. The mission of the Bit Bank, Inc. is to ensure that computers and technological assistance are available to all while helping to preserve the environment: It provides free or low cost computers and resources to low income, elderly or disabled individuals, and non-profit, educational, or religious organizations, and refurbishes computer equipment that normally would end up in a landfill; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, it is the City of Renton's policy to consider the best use of surplus property, including, in certain cases, donation to a non-profit organization that serves or benefits the public in accordance with RCW 39.33.010, and by decision of the Finance and Information Services Administrator; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The Finance and Information Services Administrator is authorized to donate the City's surplus computer-related equipment and printers to the non-profit organization, The Bit Bank, Inc., of Sultan, Washington. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1205:8/16/06:ma 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: j i Submitting Data: For Agenda of: %isl' Dept/Div/Board.. Finance& IS Department September 11, 2006 Staff Contact Michael E. Bailey Agenda Status Finance/IS Administrator Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Second Interlocal Agreement Among Valley Cities Ordinance Regarding the Department of Justice/Cops More Resolution Grant for Technology Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Interlocal Agreement Information Resolution Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept Other • Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated latiorl Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Staff presents a resolution for a second interlocal agreement among the cities of Algona, Auburn, Fife, Kent,Pacific, Puyallup, Renton, and Sumner. This interlocal agreement authorizes the hiring of consultant, CBG Communications Inc., and agrees that the City of Auburn will act as the agent for Valley Cities regarding the consultant's services to develop a fiber optic cabling and wireless strategy for deployment in the participating communities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Pass the resolution and authorize the signing of the interlocal agreement. H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\O1_AgendaBills\Interlocal re Cops More Grant.doc \`SY O� FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES ,, •, ® , DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUMhilL DATE: September 1, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: a KathyKeolker, Mayor c�sc� . FROM: Mike Bailey, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: George McBride, ext. 6886 SUBJECT: Second Interlocal Agreement Among Valley Cities Regarding the Department of Justice/Cops More Grant for Technology ISSUE Should the City of Renton approve an interlocal agreement among the Valley Cities? This second agreement authorizes the hiring of a consultant, CBG Communications Inc., loseand agrees that the City of Auburn will act as agent for the Valley Cities. Under the City of Auburn's oversight, the consultant will develop a fiber optic cabling and wireless strategy for deployment in the participating communities. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Interlocal Agreement. BACKGROUND In June 2006 the Council approved an interlocal agreement among the Valley Cities to work cooperatively toward expenditure of the grant funds received from the Department of Justice/Cops More Grant. This second interlocal agreement authorizes the next steps for this project. Last year the mayors of the Valley Cities discussed improving the technology infrastructure throughout the valley. The City of Auburn, as the lead agency for this project, applied for and received a federal grant in the amount of$98,723. This grant is known as the Cops More Grant and is administered by the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice. A portion of the grant funds, $42,000, will be used to develop a needs analysis and a strategic vision in each of the participating jurisdictions. The remaining funds will fund a small wireless interoperability pilot project between jurisdictions. err► h:\finance\adminsup\02_issuepapers_memos to council or mayor\memo re interlocal agmt cops more grant monies.doc f� -- Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Re: Second Interlocal Agreement Among Valley CitiesRegarding the Department of Justice/Cops MoreGrant for Technology September 1, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Nomad The consultant's analysis will include an examination of the fiber infrastructure in each jurisdiction, as well as a study of wireless technology, its application within each jurisdiction, and throughout the valley. For the City of Renton, this includes a statistically valid stakeholder's survey to learn more from the community about their technology. GM/dlf cc: Jay Covington,CAO Marty Wine,Assistant to the CAO George McBride,Acting IS Director 44.1100 h:\finance\adminsup\02_issuepapers_memos to council or mayor\memo re interlocal agmt cops more grant monies.doc AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on this day of , 2006, by and between the CITIES OF AUBURN, FIFE, PUYALLUP, SUMNER, ALGONA, PACIFIC, KENT, RENTON AND TUKWILA, all municipal corporations of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Valley Cities"), and CBG COMMUNICATIONS, INC., hereinafter referred to as the"Consultant." WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, the Valley Cities have received funding from the Federal government to conduct strategic planning for future telecommunications infrastructure within the region encompassing the member cities; and, WHEREAS, the Valley Cities desire to retain the Consultant to provide certain services in connection with said project; and, WHEREAS, the Consultant is qualified and able to provide consulting services in connection with the Valley Cities' needs for the above-described work/project, and is willing and agreeable to provide such services upon the terms and conditions herein contained; and, WHEREAS, the Valley Cities wish to have the City of Auburn (hereinafter referred to as ___ the "City") serve as the agent for the Valley Cities regarding the Consultant's services; and, WHEREAS, the City of Auburn agrees to act as agent for the Valley Cities. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform in a good and professional manner the tasks described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (The tasks described on Exhibit "A" shall be individually referred to as a "task," and collectively referred to as the "services.") The Consultant shall perform the services as an independent contractor and shall not be deemed, by virtue of this Agreement and the performance thereof, to have entered into any partnership, joint venture, employment or other relationship with the City. 2. Additional Services. From time to time hereafter, the parties hereto may agree to the performance by the Consultant of additional services with respect to related work or projects. Any such agreement(s) shall be set forth in writing and shall be executed by the respective parties prior to the Consultant's performance of the services there under, except as may be provided to the contrary in Section 3 of this Agreement. Upon proper completion and execution of an addendum (agreement for additional services), such addendum shall be incorporated into this Agreement and shall have the same force and effect as if the terms of such addendum were a part of this Agreement as originally executed. The performance of services pursuant to an addendum shall be subject-to the terms and Page 1 of 9 conditions of this Agreement except where the addendum provides to the contrary, in which case the terms and conditions of any such addendum shall control. In all other respects, any addendum shall supplement and be construed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 3. Performance of Additional Services Prior to Execution of an Addendum. The parties hereby agree that situations may arise in which services other than those described on Exhibit "A" are desired by the City and the time period for the completion of such services makes the execution of addendum impractical prior to the commencement of the Consultant's performance of the requested services. The Consultant hereby agrees that it shall perform such services upon the oral request of an authorized representative of the City pending execution of an addendum, at a rate of compensation to be agreed to in connection therewith. The invoice procedure for any such additional services shall be as described in Section 7 of this Agreement. 4. Consultant's Representations. The Consultant hereby represents and warrants that it has all necessary licenses and certifications to perform the services provided for herein, and is qualified to perform such services. 5. Valley Cities and City's Responsibilities. The City shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of the Consultant: a. Designate in writing a person to act as the City's representative with respect to the services. The City's designee shall have complete authority to transmit '' instructions, receive information, interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the services. b. Furnish the Consultant with all information, criteria, objectives, schedules and standards for the project and the services provided for herein. c. Arrange for access to the property or facilities as required for the Consultant to perform the services provided for herein. d. Examine and evaluate all studies, reports, memoranda, plans, sketches, and other documents prepared by the Consultant and render decisions regarding such documents in a timely manner to prevent delay of the services. e. Act as the agent of the Valley Cities in all aspects of the administration of this Agreement. f. Compensate the Consultant from the grant funds held by the City on behalf of the Valley Cities. The Valley Cities shall: a. Direct all instructions for the Consultant to the City. b. Furnish the Consultant with all information for the project and the services provided for herein. c. Designate in writing a person to act as each city's representative with respect to providing information to the Consultant. Page 2 of 9 6. Acceptable Standards. The Consultant shall be responsible to provide, in connection with the services 4,0110, contemplated in this Agreement, work product and services of a quality and professional standard acceptable to the City. 7. Compensation. As compensation for the Consultant's performance of the services provided for herein, the City shall pay the Consultant the fees and costs specified on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof (or as specified in an addendum). The Consultant shall submit to the City an invoice or statement of time spent on tasks included in the scope of work provided herein, and the City shall process the invoice or statement in the next billing/claim cycle following receipt of the invoice or statement, and shall remit payment to the Consultant thereafter in the normal course, subject to any conditions or provisions in this Agreement or addendum. 8. Time for Performance and Term of Agreement. The Consultant shall perform the services provided for herein in accordance with the direction and scheduling provided on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the day of 200 , and shall terminate upon completion of the performance of the scope of work provided herein, according to the schedule provided on Exhibit "C" attached hereto, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. *o''' 9. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, reports, memoranda, diagrams, sketches, plans, surveys, design calculations, working drawings and any other materials created or otherwise prepared by the Consultant as part of his performance of this Agreement (the "Work Products") shall be owned by and become the property of the Valley Cities, and may be used by the Valley Cities for any purpose beneficial to the Valley Cities. 10. Records Inspection and Audit. All compensation payments shall be subject to the adjustments for any amounts found upon audit or otherwise to have been improperly invoiced, and all records and books of accounts pertaining to any work performed under this Agreement shall be subject to inspection and audit by the City for a period of up to three (3) years from the final payment for work performed under this Agreement. 11. Continuation of Performance. In the event that any dispute or conflict arises between the parties while this Contract is in effect, the Consultant agrees that, notwithstanding such dispute or conflict, the Consultant shall continue to make a good faith effort to cooperate and continue work toward successful completion of assigned duties and responsibilities. 12. Administration of Agreement. This Agreement shall be administered by, on behalf of the New Consultant, and by the Mayor of the City, or designee, on behalf of the City. Any written Page 3 of 9 notices required by the terms of this Agreement shall be served on or mailed to the following addresses: City of Auburn Consultant Auburn City Hall Tom Robinson 25 West Main 73 Chestnut Road Auburn, WA 98001-4998 Suite 301 (253) 931-3000 FAX (253) 931-3053 Paoli, PA 19301 (610) 889-7470 FAX(610) 889-7475 13. Notices. All notices or communications permitted or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered in person or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, for mailing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed, if to a party of this Agreement, to the address for the party set forth above, or if to a person not a party to this Agreement, to the address designated by a party to this Agreement in the foregoing manner. Any party may change his, her or its address by giving notice in writing, stating his, her or its new address, to any other party, all pursuant to the procedure set forth in this section of the Agreement. 14. Insurance. The Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining, during the term of this Agreement and at its sole cost and expense, the types of insurance coverages and in the amounts Ned described below. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, the Consultant has furnish evidence, satisfactory to the City, of all such policies. During the term hereof, the Consultant shall take out and maintain in full force and effect the following insurance policies: a. Commercial General Liability insurance, acceptable to the Valley Cities, insuring the Consultant against loss or damages arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. Each Valley City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the Valley Cities, with minimum liability limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit for personal injury, death or property damage in any one occurrence. b. Such workmen's compensation and other similar insurance as may be required by law. c. Professional liability insurance with minimum liability limits of$1,000,000. d. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. Page 4 of 9 15. Indemnification. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless each Valley City and its Noi"Y officers, agents and employees, or any of them from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, including attorney fees, by any reason of or arising out of the act or omission of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, or any of them relating to or arising out of the performance of this Agreement except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of that Valley City. If a final judgment is rendered against a Valley City, its officers, agents, employees and/or any of them, or jointly against a Valley City and the Consultant and their respective officers, agents and employees, or any of them, the Consultant shall satisfy the same to the extent that such judgment was due to the Consultant's negligent acts or omissions. Each Valley City shall indemnify and hold all other Valley Cities and their agents, employees, and/or officers, harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense any and all claims, demands, suits, at law or equity, actions, penalties, losses, damages, or costs, of whatsoever kind or nature, brought against another Valley City arising out of, in connection with, or incident to the execution of this Agreement and/or the Indemnifying Valley City's performance or failure to perform any aspect of this Agreement; provided, however, that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of another Valley City, its agents, employees, and/or officers, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Indemnifying Valley City; and provided further, that nothing herein shall require the Indemnifying Valley City to hold harmless or defend another Valley City, its agents, employees and/or officers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of that other Valley City, its agents, employees, and/or officers. No liability shall attach to the any Valley City by reason of entering into this Agreement except as expressly provided herein. It is specifically understood that the indemnifications provided hereunder constitutes a waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance laws, Title 51 RCW, solely as it relates to the indemnifying party's employees and solely for the purpose of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement. 16. Assignment. No party to this Agreement shall assign any right or obligation hereunder in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. No assignment or transfer of any interest under this Agreement shall be deemed to release the assignor from any liability or obligation under this Agreement, or to cause any such liability or obligation to be reduced to a secondary liability or obligation. 17. Amendment, Modification or Waiver. No amendment, modification or waiver of any condition, provision or term of this Agreement shall be valid or of any effect unless made in writing, signed by the party or parties to be bound, or such party's or parties' duly authorized representative(s) and ``' we specifying with particularity the nature and extent of such amendment, modification or Page 5 of 9 4411111111. waiver. Any waiver by any party of any default of the other party shall not effect or impair any right arising from any subsequent default. Nothing herein shall limit the remedies or rights of the parties hereto under and pursuant to this Agreement. 18. Termination and Suspension. The City and the Consultant may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party if the other party fails substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party terminating the Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven (7) days written notice to the Consultant if the services provided for herein are no longer needed from the Consultant. If this Agreement is terminated through no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination in accordance with the rate of compensation provided in Exhibit"B"hereof. 19. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits and obligations provided for herein shall inure to and bind, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, provided that this section shall not be deemed to permit any transfer or assignment otherwise prohibited by this Agreement. This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties hereto and it does not create a contractual relationship with or exist for the benefit of any third party, including contractors, sub-contractors and their sureties. 20. Costs to Prevailing Party. In the event of such litigation or other legal action, to enforce any rights, responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing parties shall be entitled to receive its reasonable costs and attorney's fees. 21. Applicable Law. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by, and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Washington and venue for any action hereunder shall be in King County, Washington; provided, however, that it is agreed and understood that any applicable statute of limitation shall commence no later than the substantial completion by the Consultant of the services. 22. Captions, Headings and Titles. All captions, headings or titles in the paragraphs or sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Agreement or act as a limitation of the scope of the particular paragraph or sections to which they apply. As used herein, where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural and vice versa and masculine, feminine and neuter expressions shall be interchangeable. Interpretation or construction of this Agreement shall not be affected by any determination as to who is the drafter of this Agreement, this Agreement having been drafted by mutual agreement of the parties. Niud Page 6 of 9 23. Severable Provisions. Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any provision hereof is Now illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto in respect to the transactions contemplated hereby and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter. 25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be one and the same Agreement and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. CITY OF AUBURN CONSULTANT Peter B. Lewis, Mayor Name: Title: %err Attest: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk Approved as to form: Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Page 7 of 9 CITY OF FIFE CITY OF PUYALLUP , , Attest: Attest: , City Clerk , City Clerk Approved as to form: Approved as to form: , City Attorney , City Attorney CITY OF SUMNER CITY OF ALGONA Attest: Attest: , City Clerk , City Clerk Approved as to form: Approved as to form: , City Attorney , City Attorney Page 8 of 9 CITY OF PACIFIC CITY OF KENT , , Attest: Attest: , City Clerk , City Clerk Approved as to form: Approved as to form: , City Attorney , City Attorney CITY OF RENTON CITY OF TUKWILA r , , Attest: Attest: , City Clerk , City Clerk Approved as to form: Approved as to form: , City Attorney , City Attorney Page 9 of 9 EXHIBIT A 100 SCOPE OF WORK A. Develop a strategic plan to meet community and public agency needs through potential uses of fiber optic and wireless broadband infrastructure and services - It will be necessary to understand how a comprehensive fiber optic and wireless broadband system can enhance existing connectivity, as well as provide broadband connectivity where none is being provided today. In this vein, some of the potential users and uses are: • Government communications services o Safety (Police and Fire) o Public Works o Social Services o Emergency notification • Residential o Areas not served or underserved by cable modem, DSL or other forms of broadband o Digital divide issues o Areas requiring portability • Business o Areas not served or underserved by cable modem, DSL, or other means such as existing fiber optics o Impact on economic development and tourism CBG will perform the following activities and tasks: • CBG will perform a high-level analysis of existing telecommunications infrastructure/services in the areas represented by the Valley Cities. This will include identifying broadband access options available to the communities in the Valley Cities' area, as well as businesses, residents, and schools within the area including provider names, contact information and general availability and functionality as well as the costs for those services. • CBG will identify the current and future demand for fiber optic (backbone, dedicated and fiber-to-the-premises [FTTP]) and wireless broadband services in the Valley Cities area. Focus groups and discussions will be held with local officials in each community to determine internal needs, as well as known, unfulfilled, Community broadband needs, demands and concerns for current and future wireline and wireless telecommunications in the area. Specifically, various local agency staff such as IT, economic development, public safety and administration, and elected officials will have a sense for what current governmental as well as residential and business needs may exist. In addition to these meetings, relevant public documents will be identified reviewed. Page 1 of 5 Focus groups will also be held with representative community, school district, and other educational and business organizations in each Valley Cities' jurisdiction concerning their Nor wireline and wireless broadband needs. B. Determine the specific operational relationship between a new wireline/wireless broadband network and the current local government-owned emergency communications and wide area networks - Because the existing public safety systems are critical to the connectivity and communications applications of government and educational entities in the Valley Cities area, it will be extremely important to specifically look at the functions of the two systems that are synergistic with a potential new fiber optic wireline/wireless broadband network and how such a network can both interconnect to and expand and enhance the capabilities of existing systems. • CBG will work with the architects, engineers and operations personnel for the existing networks to explore the most feasible and efficient integration of a new wireline/wireless broadband system. C. Preparation and Analysis of a Mail-out Residential Survey– • CBG will develop a survey instrument to be mailed to a random sampling of homes in each of the Valley Cities. Topic areas to be covered by the surveys include demographic information; current broadband services; attitudes toward a variety of broadband-related issues such as connection speed (transfer rate), cost, customer service, installation and applications; user profiles; needs and interests for additional and new broadband services; `— preference for various types of providers and systems; and other issues. • CBG will work with the Valley Cities to develop the random sample and prepare an appropriate survey instrument. Copying, printing and sending and receiving mailing costs will be the responsibility of the Valley Cities (typically surveys are sent via first class mail to reinforce their importance, but are received back by business mail permit or another low cost means). In order to ensure valid statistical data for each individual city as well as the region as a whole, approximately 17,500 mailings will be made, covering the Valley Cities as indicated below. Table 3 Community Population Households Recommended Anticipated Random number Sampling Size returned Algona 2,460 879 300 100 Auburn 40,314 19,400 3,000 300 Fife 4,784 2,111 600 200 Kent 79,524 32,534 3000 300 Pacific 5,527 2,054 600 200 Puyallup 35,496 13,385 3000 300 Renton 50,052 22,699 3000 300 Page 2 of 5 • Sumner 8,504 3,687 1000 300 Tukwila 17,181 7,817 3000 300 Total 17,500 2,300 This will provide valid statistical data for the region as a whole, as well as the oversampling needed to provide valid statistical data that is individually applicable to each jurisdiction. • From all the data gathered above CBG will evaluate fiber/wireless broadband models to meet the needs assessed and begin to identify the parameters that would be needed in an RFP or other solicitation and development process. D. Assist the Valley Cities leadership in determining goals for a new wireline/wireless broadband network (such as uses and potential income) - Based on the information gathered in the above steps, CBG will equip the Valley Cities with the information needed as well as a basis for going forward with an RFP or other solicitation and development process to facilitate a fiber optic/wireless system in the Valley Cities area. The steps in Tasks 1 and 2 mentioned above will also ensure a high level of government official, business and residential input into, and understanding of, the ultimate fiber optic and wireless network model and solution. • CBG will prepare a draft Strategic Plan and present it to the Valley Cities, identifying potential system models, costs/benefits, identified uses and users and potential income if a revenue generating (rather than revenue neutral) model is pursued. Nosie • Feedback from the Valley Cities leadership will then be incorporated in the overall data set and a final Strategic Plan will be developed and a of which will be provided to each of the Valley Cities. Page 3 of 5 EXHIBIT B stimy PROJECT COST The following hours and associated costs will be needed to perform each of the project elements for the Strategic Planning and Related Services Project. Category Task Hours CBG Cost Strategic planning to meet community and public agency needs through potential uses of fiber optic and wireless 102 $15,300 broadband infrastructure and services Operational relationship with existing public safety system 30 $4,500 Development and analysis of a residential community survey 52 $7,800** Assist the Valley Cities leadership in determining overarching goals for a fiber optic/wireless network (such as uses and 16 $2,400 potential income) Sub Total 200 $30,000* CBG to be reimbursed for expenses such as long distance telephone, contract clerical charges, postage, copy and reproduction expenses, Fed Ex or courier expenses, other $3,300 similar expenses and where needed, travel expenses such as airfare, hotel, ground transportation, etc. 11% above Professional Services fees is used for estimation purposes. Specific coding costs for residential community survey(2300 $5,750 surveys returned) Total $39,050 * A blended rate of$150 per hour is used for cost estimation purposes. ** The nine Valley Cities together are responsible for a sending mailing cost of approximately$8,750 (17,500 sent surveys times $0.50 per survey)and receiving mailing costs of approximately$345 (2,300 times $0.15 per received survey). CBG will not exceed the above total expenditure of$39,050.00 without prior authorization of the Valley Cities. Now Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT C TIME SCHEDULE AND DELIVERABLES FOR THE PROJECT Deliverable Delivery Date Delivery of Mail-out Residential Survey to the Cities September 1, 2006 Presentation of the Draft Strategic Plan November 15, 2006 Presentation of Final Strategic Plan December 15, 2006 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON Nome RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITIES OF ALGONA, AUBURN, FIFE, KENT, PACIFIC, PUYALLUP, RENTON, SUMNER, AND TUKWILA (VALLEY CITIES), AUTHORIZING RETAINING CBG COMMUNICATIONS INC. AS THE CONSULTANT AND AGREES THAT THE CITY OF AUBURN WILL SERVE AS THE AGENT FOR THE VALLEY CITIES IN PROJECT SUPPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE / COPS MORE GRANT FOR TECHNOLOGY. WHEREAS, for the last number of years there has been a greater interaction between the cities of Algona, Auburn, Fife, Kent, Pacific, Puyallup, Renton, Sumner, and Tukwila (Valley Cities) relative to a number of different issues, including law enforcement, on which they have similar positions and common interests; and WHEREAS, in order to more effectively address law enforcement needs of the cities, the Valley Cities have joined together to seek monies to enhance their law enforcement needs. The Valley Cities are eligible to receive grant funds in the amount of ninety-eight thousand seven hundred and twenty-three dollars ($98,723.00); and WHEREAS, in June 2006 the City of Renton entered into an Interlocal Agreement among Green River, White River and Puyallup River Valley Cities for Cooperation in Acceptance and Use of Department of Justice/ Cops More Grant so that the grant funds could be received (Resolution No. 3817); and WHEREAS, the City of Renton now agrees to the retainage of CBG Communications Inc. as the consultant and to the City of Auburn serving as agent for the Valley Cities to provide Nouse 1 immonnior RESOLUTION NO. oversight of the consultant's services of developing a fiber optic cabling and wireless strategy for deployment in the participating communities; NOW, THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement entitled "Agreement for Consulting Services." PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Ned Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1209:9/6/06:ma 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: el, 9 Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of; September 11, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Technical Services Staff Contact Karen McFarland, x7209 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Final Approval for the Holmes Latecomer Correspondence.. Agreement/Graham Ave NE (LA-06-001) Latecomer Ordinance Request Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Final Latecomer Agreement Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Otilsi Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: City Code allows that when sanitary sewer facilities are installed by a developer that the City grant a latecomer agreement in order to ensure that each property that benefits from the new facility be assessed its fair share of the costs. On March 20, 2006, Council granted preliminary approval of a latecomer agreement(LA-06-001) request to Mr. Bret Holmes. Following construction and the determination of actual costs, staff presents the latecomer agreement for final approval by Council. Mr. Holmes has installed the agreed upon improvements and transferred title to all of these improvements to the City. The final cost of $60,820 is $25,180 less than the original estimate of$86,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Grant a final 15-year latecomer agreement(LA-06-001) to Mr. Bret Holmes for sewer main extension along Graham Ave NE and to authorize staff to finalize the latecomer agreement per City Code. /411601 H:\File Sys\PRM-Property Services Administration\PRM-27-Assessment Districts From 1994 and Forward\0032\Holmes\agbill0806.doc\KLMtp 0.‹ Y 0� PLANNING/BUILDING/ Nome ♦ �. , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT � o� MEMORANDUM DATE: August 29, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, May FROM: k Gregg Zimmermaii Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen McFarland, Technical Services Specialist(ext. 7209) SUBJECT: Holmes Latecomer Agreement/Graham Ave NE Sanitary Sewer Extension Along Graham Ave NE ISSUE: Does Council wish to grant final approval for a 15-year latecomer agreement (LA-06- 001) to Mr. Bret Holmes for the installation of approximately 300 lineal feet of sewer main along Graham Ave NE? RECOMMENDATION: Grant Mr. Bret Holmes' request for a latecomer agreement and give final approval for a latecomer agreement to extend the sewer main along Graham Ave NE. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: On February 22, 2006, Mr. Bret Holmes submitted an application for a latecomer agreement. This latecomer agreement would allow the applicant to recover a portion of the costs associated with extending the sewer main along Graham Ave NE. On March 20, 2006, Council granted preliminary approval of Mr. Holmes' latecomer request. At that time, the estimated cost of the proposed sewer was $86,000. As allowed by the City's code, developers may ask for reimbursement of a pro rata portion of the original costs for public works facilities they install and turn over to the City. Mr. Holmes has extended sewer to his proposed single-family residence. Thus, having installed all of the agreed upon improvements and having transferred title to all of the improvements to the City, the developer has completed all of the actions required of him to finalize this latecomer agreement. Latecomer agreements are contracts between the City and a developer for construction of '1m''" public works facilities and authorize reimbursement of a developer by other property Council/Holmes Latecomers August 29.2006 Page 2 of 2 owners who did not contribute to the original cost of the facilities and who subsequently tap into or use the facilities. The proposed latecomer agreement would require the owners of benefiting properties to pay an equitable share of the cost of these facilities if ,4.104 they decide to use these facilities. The properties included in this latecomer agreement did not previously have sewer service available. The facility installed by Mr. Holmes is a local service facility, and as such, will only benefit the properties directly adjacent to the new main. Because the only benefiting parcels are those that front the facility, a direct benefit charge was established using the front footage method. This method takes the frontage of the lot and divides the cost of the sewer improvements equally to determine an assessment amount. The final cost of the installed sewer line was $60,820. This is $25,180 less than the original estimate of$86,000, which was granted in the preliminary approval. Therefore, the assessment, based upon the final cost, is $101.49 per front foot. CONCLUSION: City Code allows that when sanitary sewer facilities are installed by a developer that the City grant a latecomer agreement in order to ensure that each property that benefits from the new facility be assessed its fair share of the costs. Following construction and the determination of actual costs, staff presents the latecomer agreement for final approval by Council. Therefore, we recommend that Council approve staffs request to grant a final 15-year latecomer agreement(LA-06-001) to Mr. Bret Holmes for sewer main extension along Graham Ave NE and to authorize staff to finalize the latecomer agreement per City Code. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Dave Christensen, Wastewater and Technical Services Supervisor Juliana Fries,Development Services Engineering Specialist H:\File Sys\PRM-Property Services Administration\PRM-27-Assessment Districts From 1994 and Forward\00 3 2\Holmes\I P_I n 10806.d o c\KL Mtp Return Address: me City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Title: LATECOMER'S AGREEMENT Property Tax Parcel Numbers: 427920-0140; Project File#: PRM-27-0032 427920-0150; 427920-0160 and 102305-9328 Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 1. Bret S. and Alison A. Holmes y. Complete legal description is in Exhibit"B"of this document. �K,,;, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: frvi ( . A portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 Nort ti- *,M. in } the City of Renton, King County, Washington �.�. THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this ; W: 20 by and between the CITY OF RENTON, hereinaP referred Y,"and Bret S. and Alison A. Holmes,hereinafter referred to as "DEVE 9€ t . Nose WHEREAS, the "DEVELOPE' •• ous o :7 .; astewater systems and S k � appurtenances thereto at, nett r•• e her s a esc'i s ed property and to connect same to the "CITY'S" utility.9 . o mprovements will constitute an integral part • thereof; and t n , ' �- WI-E' • )s or users are presently available to share in the cost and expen ,struct' . •.uch �` s vements, and the parties hereto having in mind the provisio t -rms s,.' `Municipal Water and Sewer Facilities Act"(R.C.W. 35.91.020, et seq.)and ���'�� a4 � ; legislation(R.C.W. 35.72.010, et seq.); and WHEREAS, the `DEVELOPER" is willing to pay all the costs and expenses for the installation of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND CONVENANTED BY AND BETWEEN THE AFORESAID PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: Page 1 w PRM27-0032: HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE 1. The "DEVELOPER" hereby acknowledges and covenants that he is the owner of the following described property,to wit: See Exhibit"A" and the"DEVELOPER" hereby agrees and covenants to cause to have installed the following described improvements, to wit: 1. 299 linear feet of 8-inch PVC Sewer Main 2. 1 54-inch diameter manhole 3. 1 48-inch diameter manhole and such installation to be made in full compliance with all appli " regulations of the"CITY". The"DEVELOPER" further coePa :x and warra ,it expenses and claims in connection with the construct' s nst. ,+n of the a' "d improvements,whether for labor or materials or both, h E • will be paid in full,all at the"DEVELOPER'S"expense, and t ".` OPER`'. ;alts and agrees to hold the"CITY"harmless from any liability i 2. The "DEVELOPE"' t :" that t i cost of said construction as hereinabove speci � � t�! t �, �� �it"B"attached hereto for the legal descri• • � � .ou� a�` a�e e",;.10 sing the lands affected by this latecomer ; v & Y 2 a' ,"? ,"a i• ; ached hereto for the map showing in outline the land a 6 such rl•nal c arges per the terms of this agreement. st The tota, • 'I of the cost of said improvement shall be employed to determine the pro x;`asCs� rata reimbursement to the"DEVELOPER"by any owner of real estate who did not contribute to the original cost of such improvement, and who subsequently wishes to tap into or hookup to or use said facilities, which tap or hookup shall include connections to lateral or branches connecting thereto, all subject to the laws and ordinances of the "CITY"and the provisions of this agreement. Page 2 e PRM27-0032: HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE The method of determining latecomer payments shall be by: Front foot method The pro rata cost is $101.49. 3. It is hereby found and determined that the construction and installation of said aforedescribed improvement is in the public interest. 4. The"DEVELOPER" hereby agrees and covenants to convey, transfer, and assign unto the "CITY"all rights, interest and title in and to said improvements and all appurtea anees and accessories thereto, free from any claim and encumbrance of any party IS � er; y "CITY"agrees to accept and maintain said improvement as part of a '�-•-e-m upon approval thereof by the Administrator of the Planning/Build.te'J'it is Works'.i9...45‘k+ ent lir or his/her authorized representative and after inspectio t's s co 6 action. TheY; "DEVELOPER"further agrees and covenants to execu ;,..Yiver unto the "CITY" ',;"*V* F >,.w any and all documents including Quit C1. "' ' Lr=w. and Bi t.; 'g:. e that may reasonably IA ' "Cl , ''•nveyance and be necessary to fully vest title in the CI E � �+� � uat r transfer. The"DEVELOP er ag ,' r o pay unto the"CITY" such - too service charges or of f ay be') ,, ; 'd_" by the"CITY" for use of the s , 1 improvements for , �� j,.,: , s ! ,r 0'i. s - , . �� . �. . P- 5. Ti, s th s, p„° ithout affecting the validity or terms of this agreement, to rn' ' . C'" • s 1Ft;de e 'nsions to or additions of the above improvement and to 11 allo , ,- 4.0t(,-,.4,1ons to be made to said extensions or additions,without liability on the part x�� � �,t TY". 6. No person, firm, or corporation shall be granted a permit to use or be authorized to tap into the facility during the period of 15 years from date hereof, without first paying unto the "CITY", in addition to any and all other costs, fee, and charges made or assessed for each tap, or for the main facilities constructed in connection therewith, or for street, signalization, and lighting improvements,the amount required by the provisions of this Itimpe Page 3 PRM27-0032: HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE contract except such charges shall not apply to any extension of the main facility. All amounts so received by the"CITY" shall be paid out by it unto the"DEVELOPER" under the terms of this agreement within thirty(30) days after receipt thereof, less a 15% administration fee. Furthermore, in case any tap, hookup, or connection is made into any such contracted facility without such payment having been first made, the legislative body of the"CITY"may cause to have removed such unauthorized tap, hookup, or connection, and all connections or related accessories located in the facility or right-of-way, and dispose of such unauthorized material so removed, without any liability on the part of the "CITY"whatever. It is further agreed, and covenanted that upon expiration of thetterms of this agreement; to wit: 15 years from date hereof,the "CITY" shall be and �' tither obligation to collect or make any further sums unto the"DEVELOPER°.'t, N. '; :., The decision of the Administrator of the Planning/Buildititk *`ic Works Dept` rc '«-lir his/her authorized representative in determining or coir '' Wartibunt due froiil any benefited owner who wishes to hookup to sucla iimprovem yt 1 be final and conclusive in all respects. ;3 '- , � , i,s .S &,qua 'y'1`:. 7. It is further agreed and r� . ,:i at th , . E ed improvements to be undertaken and paid for by the ,v,, LO have b a are about to be connected with the utilities/trans.ortatie .. , ' ,'and upon such connection and acceptance by the - gh ; il'3 ative'..dy, said extension and/or improvement shall be .:" z ome a i''';',-i. : e go al utilities or transportation systems. 8. This altt a t_ be placed for record with the King County Auditor's Office within thirty(30 f. s of final execution of the agreement. 9. Before the "CITY"will collect any latecomer's fee,the"DEVELOPER"will transfer title to all of the improvements under the latecomer's agreement to the "CITY". The "DEVELOPER"will also assign to the"CITY"the benefit and right to the latecomer's fee should the"CITY" be unable to locate the "DEVELOPER"to tender any latecomer's fee that the "CITY"has received. The"DEVELOPER" shall be responsible for keeping the Page 4 PRM27-0032: HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE "CITY" informed of its correct mailing address. Should the "CITY" be unable to locate the "DEVELOPER" in order to deliver a latecomer's fee, the"CITY" shall undertake an independent investigation to determine the location of the"DEVELOPER". Should the "CITY"after a good faith attempt to locate the"DEVELOPER" be unable to do so, then the latecomer's fee shall be placed in the Special Deposit Fund held by the "CITY" for two(2)years. At any time within the two-year period the "DEVELOPER" may receive the latecomer's fee, without interest, by applying to the "CITY" for that latecomer's fee. After the expiration of the two-year period, all rights of the "DEVELOPER"to that fee shall expire, and the"CITY" shall be deemed to be the owner of those funds. 10. When the "CITY" has received the funds for a latecomer's fee, it will f. , e I t fee to the "DEVELOPER"within thirty(30)days of receipt of the fun , RIO&r-' by negotiable instrument, such as a check, will be deemed r- cica, en (10)days a delivery to the "CITY". Should the CITY fail to fo _ t It'mer's fee to the "DEVELOPER"through the"CITY'S" sole negligence, t' g ;e^.,"CITY" shall pay the "DEVELOPER" interest on those monis; 4 :l: of twel _ • >'o) percent per annum. However, should the"DEVELOPER" nog -fg the , 4 .-'informed of its current correct 1ta mailing address, or sho x ELO a :.�:t4 ise be negligent and thus contribute to the failure of $ toth- wmer's fee,then no interest shall accrue on late payment of tM i� t 435' 'R 11. ki"; thoriz u o' re s ncil, a latecomer's agreement can be granted for a period of ' h not ed 15 years. No extensions will be granted beyond the period of time e ity Council. The latecomer's agreement will expire at the end of the ' P 3 period of`F ie'established by the City Council. 12. By instituting the latecomer's agreement,the"CITY"does not agree to assume any responsibility to enforce the latecomer's agreement. The recorded latecomer agreement will be a matter of public record and will serve as a notice to the owners of the potential assessment should connection to the improvements be made. The assessment roll listing the affected properties and the pro-rata potential latecomer charge for each will be on file °''fir✓ Page 5 PRM27-0032: HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE with the "CITY". The"DEVELOPER" has responsibility to monitor those parties connecting to the improvement. Should the"CITY" become aware of such a connection, it will use its best efforts to collect the latecomer's fee, but shall not incur any liability should it inadvertently fail to collect the latecomer's fee. ' ‘4.01, k.:,[ t k de :41,7.1 .. � 45 e b ar Via .. S ',v-,' 9'" C• Page 6 PRM27-0032: HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE *1r CITY OF RENTON By: Mayor Kathy Keolker Attest: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of ,20 , I certify tlicit ,kn t or have satisfactory evidence that Kathy Keolker-Wheeler is the'petsont f' '°appeared before me,and who signed this instrument,on oath stated that.sh .v4"i'° ' 'zed to execute the instrument and acknowledged as the Mayor,f,Ie°City of k ,e «.oe to be the free and voluntary act of such party for thy !e54;,:,,,,: :'purposes me 1 a .. the instrument. -' :4 •s ' : .. E Y v • Notary Public ink k the Stat .4 iington • �Notary(Print) ': Y °Myappointment " ,,,:, °,`'"" ,Des4;.. ,,,,,I.,, -4::,,,,i4-',.',.‘iT .?„'ci‘ ' ';',"*s.'''i'-.-...-. .,==-.. ' YVsp <7,7-- 4 xR< Q -<r 'b` u? ',." .44011, Page 7 PRM27-0032: HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE DEVELOPER By: By: INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ; ., Notary(Print) ,^ ;: :;: My appointment expires: _ , n-P*1'w. Dated: ." : ;,•. REPRESENTATIVE FORM OFACKNOWLEDciM1mT '` ',:.'ee Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING `t , I certify that I know or have satisfac itx' vilk signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/t, ;4 ere authi5 t QEF xecute the instrument and acknowledged it . • and of e be t[ I voluntary act of such party/parties for the 411-"fl d tiont&m the instrument. „Ff �.yc �� " ' � `ic in rad.“1 the State of Washington y res: TE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary De wi , S 1 WASHINGTON )ss • C• e Y OF KING ) Y .',3 On this day of ,20 ,before me personally appeared to me known to • be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Norid Page 8 EXHIBIT C CITY OF RENTON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE 4.111'' Type: Wastewater Utility Improvements $60,820.00 Property Name/Address of Owner Assessment Amount Identification Parcel #1 GRIFFIN JESSE R+MARISA N $7,611.63 11819 141ST AV SE RENTON WA 98059 KC Tax Parcel # 427920-0140 Legal Description: 6 2 LESHS CHURCH PARK ADD Parcel #2 RAINIER JACKIE H $7,611.63 11813 141ST AV SE RENTON WA 98059 KC Tax Parcel # 427920-0150 Legal Description: 7 2 LESHS CHURCH PARK ADD Parcel #3 JOHNSON JEFFERY A $7.611.63 14017 SE 118TH ST RENTON WA 98059 KC Tax Parcel # 427920-0160 q Legal Description: 8 2 LESHS CHURCH PARK ADD Parcel #4 HARMON H $30,410.00 14105 SE 118TH ST RENTON WA 98059 KC Tax Parcel # 102305-9328 Legal Description: 102305 328 N 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYE OF E MGN OF 141ST AVE SE LESS E 165 FT& LESS CO ROAD P:\PRM-27-Assessment Districts From 1994 and Forward\0032\Holmes\fnl_assmnt_holmes.doc Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT A ""' HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE (PRM27-0032) DEVELOPER PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Block 2, Lesh's Church Park, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 77 of Plats, Page 37, in King County, Washington. Situate in the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Now EXHIBIT B HOLMES LATECOMER AGREEMENT/GRAHAM AVE NE (PRM27-0032) AREA OF LATECOMER LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 6 - 8, inclusive, Block 2, Lesh's Church Park, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 77 of Plats, Page 37, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the North Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying east of the easterly margin of Graham Ave NE (formerly known as 141St Ave SE); LESS the east 165 feet; AND LESS roads. All situate in the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Tr: X -41i3iT C LATECOMER AGREEMENT VICINITY MAP 11111111 W z 41t- . 0.a NE 9T" STREET D w = 11111kin Iz l a. illih, I > la I I = I <C' oc al SIllik 4i°' Lek r.E,-,4,i, - - PROP At 16,1/4 11111. A I 1\-\\-\\I BENEFITED PROPERTIES PROPOSED GRAHAM:.STREET - - ` SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION I'/ I I /A DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY X- J(- LATECOMER BOUNDARY EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 50 100 200 EXISTING MANHOLES Q .SCALE: 1" = 100'} w CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: ° Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. For Agenda of: Sept. 11, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division Staff Contact Rob Lochmiller, ext. 7303 Agenda Status: Consent X Subject: Public Hearing Correspondence Maple Valley Highway(SR 169) Phase I Project Ordinance CAG 05-098 Sanders General Construction Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Study Sessions Final Pay Estimate Information • Notice of Completion Other Interlocal Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept....... Fiscal Impact: 317.12175.016.5950.30.67.000000 Expenditure Required.. $ 74,310.14 Final Pay Estimate Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted... Revenue Generated..... Total Project Budget.. $1,183,300 Phase 1 - Construction City Share Total Project... Summary of Action: The Maple Valley Highway(SR169)Phase I Project began on September 6, 2005, and was completed on June 22, 2006. The original contract amount was $972,213.00, with the final contract amount being $828,726.20. The change in the final contract amount was due to bid item under runs and change orders. Change Order#1 was for minor changes in the amount of$4,278.00. Change Order#2 was for minor changes in the amount of$3,207.00. Change Orders 3 and 4 deleted work for a total credit of$70,950.00. Staff Recommendations: Approve the completion of the project and authorize payment of the final pay estimate, and the release of retainage for the full project in the amount of$41,436.31 after sixty(60) days, subject to the required authorization. H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\Rob\SR 169-Maple Valley Improvements\Phase 1\City Correspondance\Retainage Agenda Bill.doc ( ( ( Run Date:3/17/2006 City of Renton -Transportation Page 1 of 4 Run Time:7:38 am PROJECT PAY ESTIMATE Project:Maple Valley Highway(SR 169)Improvements:Phase 1 Estimate No. 6 2/01/2006-3/15/2006 Engineer:Robert Lochmiller Vendor "-- ,;i:PO Number: Project Number:100 : ,,,,:,, 4.. '..t.* -.',q 4,1 4t.i.'Total Authorized: 1.444.:.',,,,,"‘W- '10 A..' ' .'tf'','' :' „,Ag," $972,213.00 $908,748.00 **4'''' *, ,Jr., ,:,,,,,,,i .-.,t.r :r,,*,;,Revised Total Authorized w/CO: Contract No:CAG 05-098 ' `,' 'MIK-,:1,,?4,5'', ',,17,,Contract Working Days: 60 Award Date: 8/09/2004 V41f.04.,: gra.k44:'' ',::' •°.7':'!''4 Notice To Proceed: 8/25/2005 4:.':*" riqAt1:14-A:,... ',4;i.':.:.,;::',42''.4,',,IK,':I'A4P:-',, ,-;.':-:''::,:,,,'",i, ,;:uti ,-, ': , ;, ,, Contract ' Previous -This Estimate ", Total Work Completed' Percent ri,.,,,4:,,,;1V, -.2-ft, ',A.::*in: i-1;,'. ,' QuantitY : , Unit Prigs.', Tartal.04ce , Qty' Qty Amount Qty Amount Complete 01 Minor Change CALC 1.0000 1.0000 1.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 , 0 0.001 4 02 Final Cleanup LS 1.0000 5,300.00001[ 5,300.00 0.00001 1.00001 5'300.001 1.00001 5,300.00 100 03 1Contractor Supplied Surveying LS 1.0000] 18,500.00001 18,500.00 0.7500 0.2500 4,625.00 1.0000, 18,500.00 100 04 1SPCC Plan ! LS 1.0000 800.0000 800.00 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.0000 800.00 100 05 1Mobi1ization LS 1.0000 32,000.0000 32,000.00 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.0000 32,000.00 100 06 Traffic Control(1-10) LS 1.0000 7,500.0000 7,500.00 0.7500 0.2500 1,875.00 1.0000 7,500.00 100 07 Sequential Arrow Sign HR 360.0000 12.0000 4,320.00 80.0000 56.0000 672.00 136.0000 1,632.00 38 08 Traffic Control Supervisor HR 580.0000 44.0000 25,520.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 09 Traffic Control Labor HR 580.0000 44.0000 25,520.00 80.0000 56.0000 2,464.00 136.0000 5,984.00 23 10 Roadside Cleanup FA 1.0000 2,000.0000 2,000.00 0.0000 0.0000. 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 11 Removal Of Structure And Obstruction LS 1.0000 4,400.0000 4,400.00 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.00001 4,400.00 100 1 12 FRemove Catch Basin EA i 1.00001 150.0000L 150.001_ 1.00001 0.0000 0.00 1.00001 150.00 100 -. 13 Remove Existing Fence LF 220.0000 3.0000 660.00 235.000011 0.0000 0.00 235.0000 705.00' 107 1- 14 Roadway Excavation Incl.Haul CY 920.0000 16.0000 14,720.00 1,420.1200 0.0000 0.00 1,420.1200 22,721.921 154 15 Gravel Borrow Incl.Haul TON 3,220.0000 13.5000 43,470.00 3,026.1200 0.0000 0.00 3,026.1200] 40,85 .62 94 1 16 Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Including Haul CY 50.0000 6.0000 300.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 ---t- 17 !Structural Excavation Class B Inc.Haul CY 110.0000 16.0000 1,760.00 305A000 0.0000 0.00 3054000 4,886A01 278 18 Shoring Or Extra Excavation Class B SF 2,380.0000 0.25001 595.00 2,505.0000 0.0000 0.00 2,505.0000 626.25 105 191Ditch Excavation Incl.Haul CY 12.0000 45.0000' 540.00 0.0000 0.0000' 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 1 20 Crushed Surfacing Base Course TON 770.0000 22.0000 16,940.00 787.6000 0.0000 0.00 787.6000 17,327.201 102 21 Crushed Surfacing Top Course 1 TON 70.0000t 37.0000 2,590.00] 92.3300 0.0000 0.00 92.3300 3,416.21 132 ,L , 22 HMA Cl. 1/2 In.PG 64-22 TON 520.00001 79.0000 41,080.00 454.9000 5.00004_ 395.00, 459.90001 36,332.10' 88 23 HMA Class 1 In.PG 64-22 TON 710.00001 79.0000 56,090.00 536.8000' 0.0000] 0.00 536.80001 42,407.20 76 24 ..lob Mix Compliance Price Adjustment CALC 1 1.00001 1.00001 1.001 0.0000 0.00001 0.00 0.00001 0.00 0 25 Compaction Price Adjustment CALC 1.0000! 1.0000, 1.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 26 Concrete Barrier Type A LF 0.0000 90.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 27 1Structural Earth Wall SF 0.0000 35.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 28 Backfill For Structural Eart Wall Incl.Haul CY 0.0000 37.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 Run By: Rob Lochmiller Generated by a Sharpe Software Product Run Date:3/17/2006 City of Renton -Transportation Page 2 of 4 Run Time:7:38 am PROJECT PAY ESTIMATE Project:Maple Valley Highway(SR 169)Improvements:Phase 1 Estimate No. 6 2/01/2006-3/15/2006 Engineer:Robert Lochmiller Vendor:.Sander;Generat Conatnt$tion PO Number: Total Authorized: $972,213.00 Items Description I UM Contract , Previous This Estimate Total Work Completed Percent No. 1 Quantity Unit Price Total Price Qty Qty Amount ; Qty 1 Amount j Complete 29 Underdrain Pipe 6"Diameter LF 0.0000 5.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 30 0.00 0.0000 0.0000[ 0.00; 0.000010.00 0 - F 470.00001 44.0000 , 31 HDPE Storm Sewer Pipe 12 1n.Diam. L I 20,680.001 419.00001 0.00001 0.00 419.0000' 18,436.00 1 89 Gravel Backfill for Drains CY - - 32 I Ductile Iron Pipe 121n.Diam. LF 85.0000' 68.00001 5,780.00 80.50001 0.00001 0.00 80.5000 5,474.00 95 33 Catch Basin Type 1 EA 12.0000 850.0000 10,200.00 12.00001 0.0000 0.00 12.0000 10,200.00 100 34 Adjust Existing Manhole EA 3.0000 500.0000 1,500.00 1.0000 2.0000 1,000.00 3.0000 1,500.00 100 35 Adjust Existing Catch Basin EA 2.0000 200.0000 400.00! 0.0000 1.0000 200.00 1.0000 200.00 50 36 Connection To Drainage Structure EA 1.0000 650.0000 650.00 1.00001 0.0000 0.00 1.0000 650.00 100 37 Adjust Existing Valve Box To Grade EA 3.0000 130.0000 390.00 0.0000 3.0000 390.00 3.0000 390.00 100 38 ESC Lead DAYS 60.000050.0000 3,000.00 16.0000 6.0000 300.00 22.0000 1,100.0011 37 I - 385.00 21 1 --- - - l - 0.00001 0.00 7.0000 i 39 Inlet Protection EAI 33.0000 55.0000 1,815.00 7.0000 40 Straw Bale EA1 78.0000' 19.0000 1,482.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000' 0.00 0 41 I Erosion/Water Pollution Control FA 1.0000 3,000.0000 3,000.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 42 Silt Fence LF 530.0000 4.5000 2,385.00 133.0000 0.0000 0.00 133.0000 598.50 25 43 Property Restoration FA 1.0000 2,000.0000 2,000.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 44 Seeding,Fertilizing,and Mulching ACRE 0.1000 11,040.0000 1,104.00 0.1400 0.0000 0.00 0.1400 1,545.60 140 45 PSIPE Superform Maple(2"Cal.) EA 2.0000 310.0000 620.00 2.0000 0.0000 0.00 2.0000 620.00 100 46 ,PSIPE Arnold Promise Witchhazel(5gal.) EA 8.0000 62.0000 496.00 8.0000 0.0000 0.00 8.0000 496.00 100 47 1PSIPE Stella D'Oro Daylily EA 620.0000 8.0000 4,960.00 149.0000 0.0000 0.00 149.0000 1,192.00 24 48 ;PSIPE Emerald Green Arborvitae EA 40.0000 27.0000 1,080.00 40.0000 0.0000 0.00 40.0000 1,080.00 100 49 PSIPE Dwarf Strawberry Tree(5 Gal.) EA 18.0000' 32.0000 576.00 18.0000 0.0000 0.00 18.0000 r 576.00 100 50 1PSIPE Barren Strawberry(1 Gal.) EA. 1,239.0000, 9.0000 11,151.00 1,239.0000 0.0000 0.00 1,239.0000' 11,151.00 100 , --- - - . ._ - ---- -- 8.0000 j 1,472.00'i -- - O 00001- , --- --- 51 PSIPE Kinnikinnick 1 Gal.) EA 184.0000, ( 184.0000 � 0.00� 184.00001 1,472.00� 100 52 (Bark Mulch -- - CY[I- 28.0000 1 - 602.001 0 53 Sod Installation SY 11.0000E 30.0000 1'330.001 0.0000 .0 50 -------- --- 0.0000 14.0000 i 602.00 14.0000 p Type _ - 0.0000 0.00 - 60.0000 1,800.00 54 ITo Soil A CY 144.0000 30.0000 4,320.00 60.0000 � 42 55 Topsoil Type B CY 230.0000 26.0000 5,980.00 90.0000 0.0000' 0.00 90.0000 2,340.00 39 56 Irrigation System LS 1.0000 35,500.0000 35,500.00 0.9000 0.1000, 3,550.00 1.0000 35,500.00 100 57 Restoration Of Existing Irrigation System FA 1.0000 5,000.0000 5,000.00 0.0000 0.47021 2,351.00 0.4702' 2,351.001 47 58 Cement Conc.Traffic Curb And Gutter LF 910.0000, 19.0000 17,290.00 879.0000 0.0000 0.00 879.0000, 16,701.00 97 59 Cement Conc.Traffic Curb 1 LF, 180.0000 31.0000 1 5,580.00 252.0000 0.0000 0.00 252.0000 7,812.00 140 Run By: Rob Lochmiller ,, 1 Generated by Sharpe Software Product (._ ( ( ( 4 Run Date:3/17/2006 City of Renton -Transportation Page 3 of 4 Run Time:7:38 am PROJECT PAY ESTIMATE Project:Maple Valley Highway(SR 169)Improvements:Phase 1 Estimate No. 6 2/01/2006-3/15/2006 Engineer:Robert Lochmiller Vendor '',..„4.4:444!<-- ,¢ PO Number: 4 ' "'''`"- Total Authorized: $972,213.00 t „ j . w .;:,„'M. = I4 Contract Previous This Estimate Total Work Completed Percent .�. : °. 0A `., n: ' , (uantity" Unit Price Total Price Oty Oty Amount I Qty Amount I Complete 60 Extruded Curb LF330.0006 5.0000 1,650.00 341.0000 110.0000 550.00 451.0000 2,255.00 137 61 Raised Pavement Marker,Type 1 HUNG 2.0000 200.0000 400.00 0.0000 9.9700 1,994.00 9.9700 1,994.00 499 62 Raised Pavement Markers Type 2 HUNG 2.0000 400.0000 800.00 0.0000 0.9100 364.00 0.9100 364.00 46 63 Chain Link Fence Type 3 LF 360.0000 15.0000 5,400.00 293.0000 33.0000 495.00 326.0000 4,890.00 91 64 Double 20 Ft.Chain Link Gate EA 1.0000 1,330.0000 1,330.00 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.0000 1,330.00 100 65 End Gate,Corner,And Pull Post For Chain Link Fence EA 11.0000 150.0000 1,650.00 19.0000 2.0000 300.00 21.0000 3,150.00 191 66 Cement Conc.Sidewalk SY 270.0006 38.0000 10,260.00 389.0000 6.7000 i 254.60 395.7000 15,036.60 147 -- - 67 Cement Conc.Sidewalk Ramp Type 2A EAS 8.0000 1,170.0000 9,360.00 7.0000 2.0000 2,340.00 9.0000 10,530.001 113 68 Cement Conc.Sidewalk Ramp Type 4A EA 5.0000 960.0000 4,800.00 5.0000 0.0000 0.00 5.0000 4,800.00 I, 100 69 Modified Cement Conc.Sidewalk Ramp Type 4A EA 2.0000 2,300.00001 4,600.00 2.0000 0.00001 0.00 2.0000 4,600.001 100 70 Traffic Signal System-SR 169/Cedar Park Entrance LS 1.0000 156,800.0000 156,800.00 0.8300 0.1700 26,656.00 1.0000 156,800.00 100 71 Traffic Signal System Modification SR169/Shari's LS 1.0000 4,300.0000 4,300.00 0.0000 1.0000 4,300.00 1.0000 4,300.00 100 Driveway I 72 Casing LF 100.0000 80.0000 8,000.00 80.0000' 0.0000 0.00 80.0000 6,400.00' 80 73 Traffic Signal Interconnect SystemLSI 1.0000 8,300.0000_ 8,300.00 0.7500 0.2500 2,075.00 1.0000 8,300.001_ 100 1.0000 49,500.0000 49,500.001 --0.00 1,040.0006 10,400.00,1 100 y1.0000 49,500.00 Install; Power Conduit II --- - --- _- ------�---- _ 0.9000 0.1000 4,950.00 I --- - 93 74 Illumination System No. 1 LF} 1,120.0000 10.0000: 11,200.00 1,040.0000 I 0.0000 76 Install PSE Power Vault EA 1.0000: 1,900.0000 1,900.00 1.0000 0.0000 0.00 1.0000, 1,900.00 100 g 4,300.0000', 8,600.001 , 0.0000F 0.00' 8,600.00 100 77 Install PSE Large Power Vault 2.00002.00001, EA 2.00001, 78 Permanent Signing - -- - i LSI_ - 1 - - . 1.00001 1,700.0000 1,700.00 0.0000 1.0000 1,700.00 1.0000 1,700.00 100 79 Paint Line( LF F 320.0000 1.0000 320.00 0.0000 490.0000 490.00 490.0000 490.00 153 80 Plastic Line LF 100.00001 3.0000 300.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0 81 Plastic Stop Line ' LF 130.00001 4.0000 520.00 0.0000 82.0000 328.00 82.0000 328.00 63 82 Plastic Crosswalk Line SF 850.0000 2.0000 1,700.00 0.0000 485.3000 970.60 485.3000 970.60 57 83 Plastic Traffic Arrow EA 2.0000 65.0000 130.00 0.0000 2.0000 130.00 2.0000 130.00 100 84 Gravity Block Wall SF 90.0000 16.0000 1,440.00 48.0000 0.0000 0.00 48.0000 768.00 53 85 Glare Screen,Type 2 LF 350.0000 56.0000 19,600.00 357.0000 0.0000 0.00 357.0000 19,992.00 102 - + , 0 87 Water Quality Vault g Drainage ; LS 1.0006 132,000.0000 0.95001[ 0.050016,600.06 11.0000 132,000 00 0 86 Construction Geotextile For Underground SY 0.0000 2.5000 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 ,u„ � 132,000.00� � � 100 01 (Minor Change �ALC� 1.0000 4,278.0000 4,278.001 _1.0000 0.0000 0.00" 1.0000 4,278.001`_ 100 L Run By: Rob Lochmiller Generated by a Sharpe Software Product Run Date:3/17/2006 City of Renton -Transportation Page 4 of 4 Run Time:7:38 am PROJECT PAY ESTIMATE Project:Maple Valley Highway(SR 169)Improvements:Phase 1 Estimate No. 6 2/01/2006-3/15/2006 Engineer:Robert Lochmiller Vendor:'=`': ' x _. r ra } PO Number: $ ` "Total Authorized: $972,213.00 9 5,^„`-Yz ..e e"n 4100.;;.-t111 _ .:• p+ . 0,1,<j - •-,.....,111-11;:;:ib"_' „�Q(..� -t R '._;�•t}9 11 T tt "f• T �.•' nli C . _ . aerC< z� ,4 a y �.,., � ; ... . . 5t •�kx - ,v � Ma . � ;^ ;:;I.;. F , i�� ,,wS .!(i Jnt.yyp1 " Tota�noe , - ,TMF � „..�f .�f11)univ � �}Iz.,`444 .Argtrt, Complete 02 IMinor Change ALC 1.00001 3,207.00001 3,207.00 1.0000 I 0.0000 0.00 1.00001 3,207.001 100 Percent of Amt Completed: 85% Amount t is estimate: $78,221.20 Resident Engineer Date Percent of Days Completed: 219% C/0 Totalfo Date: $7,485.00 Contractor Started: 9/07/2005 Total Work Completed to Date: $821,241.20 Working Days Started: 9/06/2005 Materials On Hand: $0.00 Materials On Hand Deduction: $0.00 Construction Engineer Date Original Completion: 11/28/2005 Overall Total Completed: $828,726.20' Non-Working Days: 62=Deduct 5.00% Retention $(41,436.31) Time ExtensionpDays: 2'1 Retention Withheld this Estimate $(3,911.06) Construction Manager Date Estimated Com letion: 2/27/2006,Retention Withheld to Date: $(41,436.31) Actual Completion: 2/21/2006 Retention Released to Date: $0.00 Other Deductions: $0.00 Contractor's Representative Date Total Deductions: $(41,436.31) Total Due to Date: $787,289.89 Deduct Previous Payments: $(712,979.75) Balance Due This Estimate: $74,310.14 Run By: Rob LochmItier Generated by a Sharpe Software Product ! I', 4 t STAre State of Washington Reg.No.: Department of Revenue Audit Procedures&Administration Date: September 11,2006 v"2 PO Box 47474 *NW i889 Olympia,Washington 98504-7474 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: DEPARTMENT USE ONLY City of Renton Assigned To Tracy Schuld 1055 South Grady Way Date Assigned Renton,WA 98055 Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below. Description of Contract Maple Valley Highway(SR 169)Phase I Project(CAG 05-098) Contractor's Name Sanders General Construction Telephone No. (425)557-4646 Contractor's Address 5188 NW Sammamish Road,Issaquah,WA 98027 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted September 6,2005 June 22,2006 September 11,2006 Surety or Bonding Co. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America Agent's Address One Tower Square,Hartford,Connecticut 06183-9062 Contract Amount: $972,213.00 Amount Disbursed: $787,289.89 Additions or Reductions: $-143,486.80 Amount Retained: $41,436.31 Sales Tax: Total: $2,726.20 Total $828,726.20 By (Disbursing Officer) Phone No: The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue,Olympia,Washington 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENTS SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUND until receipt of Department's certificate,and then only in accordance with said certificate. FORM REV 31 0020(12-92) H:\Division.s\Transpor.tat\DESIGN.ENG\Rob\SR 169-Maple Valley Improvements\Phase 1\City Correspondance\Notice_of Completion.doc ArmnvEn -1 FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT BY September 11,2006 , Date APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS The Finance Committee approves for payment on September 11, 2006, claim vouchers 251424- 252225 and 5 wire transfers, totaling $7,864,309.52 , and 1301 direct deposits, payroll vouchers 65188-65842, and 2 wire transfers, totaling$4,312,179.06 . JJadeko. on 'ersson, " . MVO d 1/1/41 Denis Law, Vice-Chair Toni Nelson, Member fid0/0/Led 9-//2Do6 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 38,29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF APPROXIMATELY 1,475 ACRES OF CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY WITHIN RENTON'S EAST RENTON PLATEAU POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA; STATING THE NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS RESIDING THEREIN AS NEARLY AS MAY BE; CALLING FOR AN ELECTION TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSAL FOR ANNEXATION TO VOTERS OF THE TERRITORY; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE WITH THE KING COUNTY AUDITOR A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH THE CITY'S PREFERRED DATE FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION. WHEREAS, the City of Renton received a Petition for Annexation from the residents of the area generally known as the East Renton Plateau on November 15, 2005; and WHEREAS, King County has verified the signatures on the petition and determined that there are sufficient valid signatures with the petition to satisfy the 10% requirement in RCW 35A.14.020; and WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board for King County held a public hearing on June 14, 2006, to consider the proposal by the City of Renton to annex the Preserve Our Plateau Annexation area; and WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board for King County issued a Resolution and Hearing Decision for the proposed action on August 10, 2006, that supported, without modifications, the proposal by the City of Renton to annex the 1,475-acre Preserve Our Plateau Annexation area; and WHEREAS,the City Council is desirous to call an election for this annexation; 1 RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by the annexation of contiguous unincorporated territory, referred to as the Preserve Our Plateau Annexation area, lying generally in the area bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary and SE 128th Street west of 156th Avenue SE, and north of SE 138th Street and the Urban Growth Area boundary east of 154th Place SE/156th Avenue SE, as legally described in Attachment"A" hereto, which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. SECTION III. As nearly as can be determined the number of registered voters residing in the aforesaid territory is 3,150. SECTION 1V. The City Council hereby calls for a special election to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in February (February 6, 2007) pursuant to Chapter 29.13.020 RCW and Chapter 35A.14 RCW, to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for annexation. SECTION V. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of Renton. SECTION VI. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the King County Auditor pursuant to Chapter 35A.14.050. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1207:8/30/06:ma 3 Exhibit A • PRESERVE OUR PLATEAU ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The lands included within the Preserve Our Plateau Annexation area are situated in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 23, &24 all in Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M. and Sections 18 and 19, both in Township 23 North, Range 6 East,W.M., all in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the northerly right-of-way margin of SE 128th St with the easterly line of the existing City of Renton Limits as annexed under Ordinance No. 4829, in the Southwest quarter of said Section 11; Thence easterly along said northerly right-of way margin,crossing 155th Ave SE and 156th Ave SE, to the east line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 11, said east line also being the Urban Growth Boundary(UGB) line; Thence continuing easterly along the courses of the northerly right-of-way margin of SE 128th St and said UGB line, crossing 160th Ave SE and the west half of 164th Ave SE, to the section line common to said Sections 11 and 12; Thence continuing easterly along the courses of the northerly right-of-way margin of SE 128th Street and said UGB line, crossing the east half of 164th Ave SE and 169th Ave SE, to an intersection, in the Southwest quarter of said Section 12, with the northerly extension of the east line of the West quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 13; Thence southerly along said northerly extension and said east line, and said UGB line, to an intersection with the north line of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter; Thence easterly along said north line and said UGB line, to the west line of the East quarter of said subdivision; Thence southerly along said west line and said UGB line, to the Northwest corner of Lot 1 of King County Short Plat S90S0040, as recorded in Book 101 of Surveys, Page 236, records of King County, Washington; Thence easterly along the North line of said Lot 1 and said UGB line, to the northeast corner of said Lot 1, said northeast corner also being on the west line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 13; Thence easterly along said UGB line, crossing 172nd Ave SE, to the intersection of the easterly right-of-way margin of 172nd Ave SE and the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 132nd St; Thence continuing easterly along the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 132nd St and said UGB line, crossing 173rd Ave SE, 175th Ave SE, 178th Ave SE and the west half of 180th Ave SE, to an intersection with the east line of said subdivision, said east line also being the west line of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 18; Thence continuing easterly along said right-of-way margin of SE 132nd St and said UGB line, crossing the east half of 180th Ave SE, 181st Ave SE and 182nd Ave SE, to an intersection with the easterly right-of-way margin of 182nd Ave SE; Thence southerly along said easterly right-of-way margin of 182nd Ave SE and said UGB line, to an intersection with the northerly right-of-way margin of SE 134th St in the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 18; Thence easterly along said northerly right-of-way margin of SE134th St and the easterly extension of said northerly right-of-way margin and said UGB line, crossing 184th Ave SE, to an intersection with the easterly right-of-way margin of 184th Ave SE in the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 18; Thence southerly along said easterly right-of-way margin of 184th Ave SE and the southerly extension thereof and said UGB line, crossing SE 135th St, SE 136th St and SE 144th St, to an intersection with the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 144th St, as deeded to King County per King County Recording No. 3000495 in the Northwest quarter of said Section 19; Thence westerly along said southerly right-of-way margin of SE 144th St and said UGB line, to an intersection with the east line of Renton-Suburban Tracts Division No. 8, as recorded in Volume 69 of Plats,Pages 74-76, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, in Government Lot 1 of said Section 19; Thence southerly along said east line and said UGB line, to the Southeast corner of said Plat; Thence westerly along the courses of the south boundary of said plat and said UGB line, to an intersection with the south line of Renton-Suburban Tracts Div. No. 6, as recorded in Volume 66 of Plats, Pages 33-35, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, in the Northeast quarter of said Section 24; Thence westerly along the south line of said plat and said UGB line, to the most southwest corner of said plat, said southwest corner also being the northeast corner of Government Lot 5 of said Section 24; Thence southerly along the east line of said Government Lot 5 and said UGB line, to the northeast corner of Lot 31 of Renton-Suburban Tracts Div. No. 7, as recorded in Volume 69 of Plats, Pages 39-41, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Thence southwesterly and northwesterly along the south boundary of said plat and said UGB line, to an intersection with the east line of Government Lot 10 of said Section 24, said east line also being the east line of Tract A of Briarwood South No. 6, as recorded in Volume 97 of Plats, Pages 68-69, records of King County, Washington; Thence northerly along said east line of said Government Lot 10 and said Tract A and said UGB line, to the northeast corner of said Tract A; Thence westerly along said right-of-way margin and the courses of the north boundary of said Tract A, and said UGB line, to the northwest corner of said Tract A, said northwest corner also being a point on the east line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 23; Thence northerly along said east line and said UGB line, to the northeast corner of Tract C of Skyfire Ridge Div. No. 1, as recorded in Volume 141 of Plats, Pages 93-99, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Thence westerly along the courses of the north boundary of said Tract C and said UGB line, to the northwest corner of said Tract C, said northwest corner also being a point on the east line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 23; Thence northerly along said east line and said UGB line, to the northeast corner of said subdivision; Thence westerly along the north line of said subdivision and said UGB line, to the northwest corner of said subdivision, said northwest corner also being the northeast corner of Government Lot 7 of said Section 23; Thence North 88°00'30"West, along the north line of said Government Lot 7 and said UGB line in said Section 23, a distance of 100 feet; Thence South 31° 31'00"West, along said UGB line, a distance of 648 feet; Thence North 55°51'30"West, along said UGB line, a distance of 250 feet; Thence South 31°31'00" West, along said UGB line, a distance of 150 feet; Thence North 55°51'30"West, along said UGB line, to an intersection with the southeasterly right-of-way margin of 154th P1 SE (Orton County Road); Thence southwesterly along said southeasterly right-of-way margin of 154th P1 SE and said UGB line, to an intersection with the northeasterly right-of-way margin of J. E. Jones Rd. No. 1182 in said Government Lot 7, said intersection also being the point at which the UGB line and the boundary line for the subject annexation diverge; Thence northwesterly crossing 154th P1 SE, to the point of intersection of the northeasterly right-of-way margin of said J. E. Jones Rd. No. 1182 and the northwesterly right-of-way margin of 154th P1 SE; Thence northeasterly,northerly and northwesterly along the northwesterly right-of-way margin of 154th P1 SE, as established in 1962 and as currently paved for use, said right- of-way also being, in part, the northwesterly right-of-way margin of W. J. Orton Road No. 2023 by Deed, bearing Auditor's File No. 2126698 and recorded in Volume 1300 of Deeds, Page 221, records of King County, Washington, to an intersection with the north line of the northwest quarter of said Section 23; Thence northwesterly, northerly and northeasterly along said northwesterly right-of-way margin of 154th P1 SE, said right-of-way margin also being on a curve to the right, having a street center line radius of 358.1 feet, to an intersection with the southerly extension of the westerly right-of-way margin of 154th Ave SE(Maple Street) as dedicated in Cedar River Five Acre Tracts, as recorded in Volume 16 of Plats,Page 52, records of King County, Washington, in the Southwest quarter of said Section 14; Thence northerly along the westerly right-of-way margin of 154th Ave SE, to its intersection with the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 142nd St; Thence westerly, along said southerly right-of-way margin of said SE 142nd St, crossing 152nd Ave SE, to a point of intersection with the southerly extension of the westerly right- of-way margin of 152nd Ave SE, in the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 14; Thence northerly along said southerly extension and said westerly right-of-way margin of 152nd Ave SE, crossing SE 142nd St, SE 141st Pl, SE 140th Pl, SE 139th P1 and SE 138th P1, to the northeast corner of Briar Hills No. 4, as recorded in Volume 113 of Plats, Page 77, records of King County; Thence westerly along the the north line of said Plat, crossing 148th Place SE, to the northwest corner of said plat, said northwest corner also being the northeast corner of Briarwood Lane, as recorded in Volume 104 of Plats, Pages 30 and 31, records of King County, in the Southeast quarter of said Section 15, Thence continuing westerly along the north line of said Briarwood Lane plat, to the northwest corner thereof; Thence southerly along the west line of said plat, to the southwest corner thereof, said southwest corner also being a point on the north line of the South quarter of the South half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 15, and also being a point on the north line of Maple Ridge, as recorded in Volume 86 of Plats,Pages 85 and 86,records of King County; Thence westerly, northeasterly,northwesterly and westerly along the various courses of the north line of said Plat, to the northwest corner thereof; Thence southerly along the west line of said Plat, to an intersection with the south line of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 15; Thence westerly along said south line and the westerly extension of said south line, crossing 144th Ave SE, to a point on the westerly right-of-way margin of 144th Ave SE in the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 15; Thence northerly along said westerly right-of-way margin, crossing SE 138th St, to an intersection with the existing City of Renton Limits as annexed under Ordinance No. 5171, at the intersection of said westerly right-of-way margin of 144th Ave SE and the southerly right-of-way margin of NE 2nd St; Thence generally northerly and easterly along the existing City Limits of Renton, as annexed under Ordinance Nos. 5171, 4876,4760, 5140,4760, 5064 and 4829, crossing SE 128th St, to the point of beginning. �.d tamp ,,„rte■1�I=-_1L n�:��1 .. � ���,111 !i14&IIijjiIiiLil,, .. ff �\� inn.. �■ �u,L a...� ■?�.. .:G -. = e•n■ � !� i�ill ®fs � ��� = a,■. roir.z "R:titl■�i1!1a t.za m �` -n I ii 111 �� ��V1�r���� r lid In P��■■::'�■, IIIIN;■lu1 _uTl” i �.�IIIIIt. 111 - ■�. . ow i� r- ill _ ■�I f, 111 I■; _ .� . ■. 7� . tfi •••I,�� rmia . . , IJ. Lt 1 _ 1 ■ �i ■I 11111 !. 1cl_1C■'ii.■■!� �� I�G,���� _6.............., Alit �,� �.' A i.. �1 I X11 _■ !1%��i^ �I:� t��� ��� SE 13. !■1 . _111��" �� I =• �E ■� '1'd �-���.111.•!w ■�� � ■ 1■111 �■ ■ iX ,,'_ ► w11!■1 .111-`- "i �•� ■SIL - C ■� a//11■t� �`l _II_ 1:._■111111/111/1� r .• 11'. ■��'■E1 ' ygc-, ��d ..•tLGl�' ■fig■■ iIj [ =nMI' ��= ..� >t i ��11i3 111\ �S oh� � � ,� astral ■ 1 fit►/T ,t �� .■��.,�.. MEM L1�=='1=. MLR m RI SE 132nd St al emmitfa MINIM 1111 . . _ � sE 134th `� '7�71 R 11♦IA1 -■��1� g134th StNMI la milL — �� ■■=111 �• MI all\�i aU � m1■mai■s-rm=. •� — 11 ��Imilimma rr 13•4th11 lunn� � 1! ""' = , ■ .. 67St i:111it L■ _mu_ .-ni5- �.G,ul mamma(�-7�-� a X1111...,,■ El.■■t■1n..1l17r�S�tr1!■1 .41F,� MUM R1 J•..• ■ /III 11111 i�...MOEN mom 1111 �I .11 -L�:C117 .■ C �E�:1.� ��� � :n: . �■1■■i■■■■■.� ■1 � '��.■1.■1111 t.1EHi I/ 1see _el■■E91ma,1i'• pr-te- 1�i�11�u ■!mli3t I ttur litlu11■,_ ____ !�■■.,inommi I! ■111 i11►�.:: ■a ur �����IEi61�1:==_mum�;�mg 1i tf����,i1/111�i11�1 -E3iE6?�ti. �W u �"al ■,M A1■■: 1♦� �� .F s�.��■. _ ■ 111 Mlle .. _ imizgrami-dln ■ IIIII I .wt ■■■ ■■� 1111 ���■n11g1111�!�1�� .�,G nun�*:";L ..Iu r� tii InaMMI .■ imimmmu:111111 "'" i►I�....� �� ��11 noulat rill 2111 op `J,+,^ - ,r 11 SE 140 � MEI t.n. ■ r ■1 �! Z. NUM ■■- Ma 1111= .■■■ ��.► I. ._�t.� Is.s.a sas.-�. MI Are _�■�'�1U/ ■.iumniMIIIMMIN MB t� `� ■—U..11 .r11. =mt.mss,E■■RR win /3i;3tr• k'Iitha eau .`.� ■'�...,,, r ■�Ip�i °E 14:rd of -��Ei��i�''���!■■■■■■ ti Intal=��►\�iI ti ■■■■■■mases " re. ■u��jA e� i■! ��r s:1 IN /\� S�f� ^?�i1:IP 1=J1ii144th t 1111 1(A� ti ■�1 ■■ ■■.111th �:,..4:� G �� 11!` �� X111111■1■1■11 ,� /M�'+Hca■ ��ria _ ■■+��!!I ' a1■tc'� ... \111 ■ ■� M. ;•�_ im PI �� �i� .` �� mows 3•�, �'� 111��,. .b l malty mu-- •t ►t `, ��I s 0.11 i Et vim CAMI t; ■ 111 11 ���■■► Ir / ... A, 1=1 ��� «.-Wiffira :oo,A - Ii11111�� NM t St � �in. .. .♦I 1404 `J ■mat F�1Lt•'IIII.onialiii g� ,�_ Fp*. '`�/t�';�= NW V..1•1:111 /111.1.\\• 'se 11.6M 4I3v.tg= �'�gt.VIII ." mi�`erta�6 ►� *11 vii: ��*Ar i_ p��• 2!' �� 1� _�.� �,.. ,..,_ illialleiri.enter' ��•��iii al wit/A �Nen �� Proposed Preserve Our Plateau Anne• xation (d;:0 i'� •� Annexation Area i Economic Development gnning - Neighborhoods do Strata lc pla © "'`ePieta* �u "de '— — Renton City Limits O.NJ Rosario - . iuve 25 January 2006 Urban Growth Boundary /lda,Sed CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 330 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THAT THE KING COUNTY DIVISION OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS CALL A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, TO COINCIDE WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7TH, 2006, AND PLACE PROPOSITION NO. 1 BEFORE THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF RENTON ON THE NOVEMBER 7, 2006, BALLOT. WHEREAS, proponents submitted to the office of the City Clerk an initiative petition to lift the fireworks ban within the City of Renton, and adopt an ordinance establishing the times and conditions under which fireworks could be sold and used; and WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded the petition to the King County Division of Records and Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2006, the King County Division of Records and Elections certified that the petition was insufficient; and WHEREAS, on February 23, 2006, proponents filed an amendment to the petition containing additional signatures; and WHEREAS, the office of the City Clerk forwarded this amended petition to the King County Division of Records and Elections for certification whether the petition bore a sufficient number of valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2006, the King County Division of Records and Elections certified that the initiative petitions bore sufficient valid signatures to qualify for introduction to the City Council; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the initiative was not adopted by the Renton City Council, and pursuant to law, must be submitted to the voters of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The City of Renton requests, in the form of this Resolution, that King County call a special municipal election to coincide with the November 7, 2006, general election, and place Proposition 1 before the qualified electors of the City of Renton in the November 7, 2006, ballot. SECTION III. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place Proposition 1 before the voters on the November 7, 2006, election. SECTION W. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition 1. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to King County Division of Records and Elections: CITY OF RENTON INITIATIVE MEASURE CONCERNING FIREWORKS This measure would revoke the City of Renton's ban on the sale and discharge of all fireworks within the city, except for publicly sponsored displays and would allow for the sale and discharge of consumer fireworks on certain days within certain hours, to commemorate Independence Day and the New Year, and would set regulations for the sale and discharge of fireworks and penalties for violations. Should this measure be enacted into law? 0 Yes ❑ No 2 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION V. The Mayor is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 1 in the November, 2006, voter's pamphlet. SECTION VI. Actions taken prior to adoption of this resolution that are consistent with it are hereby ratified and confirmed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1208:9/5/06:ma 3 4'c/op/ed 9-// 2t0 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 213/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING FINAL PLAT(ASPENWOODS; FILE NO. LUA-06-025FP). WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is proper and advisable and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools, schoolgrounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The final plat approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth (The property, consisting of approximately 8.2 acres, is located in the vicinity of Hoquiam Avenue NE, south of NE 101 Street) 1 ' RESOLUTION NO. is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated August 14, 2006. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1206:8/16/06:ma 2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY FILE NO. 4268-675475 PARCEL A: LOTS 1 AND 2 OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. L99S0007, ACCORDING TO SHORT PLAT RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 2003 UNDER RECORDING NO. NO. 20030219900003, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOT B OF KING COUNTY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L99L0022, ACCORDING TO SURVEY RECORDED JANUARY 6, 2000 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20000106900008, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 1 \ W A Z •97 a \ 1 i J Jo NE 10TH ST \ \ I NE 9TH ST _/ W / 4 I 3 `ate . / Q p _ I SE 120Th ST 1 ' I `• / S VICINITY MAP 1"=800' 44/ed 9-// e?4,06 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3830? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE DONATION OF SURPLUS COMPUTER- RELATED OMPUTERRELATED EQUIPMENT AND PRINTERS. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has a variety of surplus computer-related equipment and printers from the 2005 /2006 computer replacement program(Surplus Equipment); and WHEREAS, other City departments have been offered the use of this equipment, with none indicating a need for it; and WHEREAS, the storage space, funds, and the time required to maintain and track this surplus computer-related equipment are limited; and WHEREAS, the expense of public funds required for City staff to prepare the subject computer-related equipment for sale or proper environmental disposal exceeds the value to the Surplus Equipment; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City and the general public to dispose of this property in the most advantageous terms available to the City and the environment; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has received a request for donation of surplus computer equipment from the non-profit organization, The Bit Bank, Inc. of Sultan, Washington. The mission of the Bit Bank, Inc. is to ensure that computers and technological assistance are available to all while helping to preserve the environment: It provides free or low cost computers and resources to low income, elderly or disabled individuals, and non-profit, educational, or religious organizations, and refurbishes computer equipment that normally would end up in a landfill; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, it is the City of Renton's policy to consider the best use of surplus property, including, in certain cases, donation to a non-profit organization that serves or benefits the public in accordance with RCW 39.33.010, and by decision of the Finance and Information Services Administrator; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The Finance and Information Services Administrator is authorized to donate the City's surplus computer-related equipment and printers to the non-profit organization, The Bit Bank, Inc., of Sultan, Washington. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1205:8/16/06:ma 2 /94/ed 9-!/-,200.E CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3e33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITIES OF ALGONA, AUBURN, FIFE, KENT, PACIFIC, PUYALLUP, RENTON, SUMNER, AND TUKWILA (VALLEY CITIES), AUTHORIZING RETAINING CBG COMMUNICATIONS INC. AS THE CONSULTANT AND AGREES THAT THE CITY OF AUBURN WILL SERVE AS THE AGENT FOR THE VALLEY CITIES IN PROJECT SUPPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE / COPS MORE GRANT FOR TECHNOLOGY. WHEREAS, for the last number of years there has been a greater interaction between the cities of Algona, Auburn, Fife, Kent, Pacific, Puyallup, Renton, Sumner, and Tukwila (Valley Cities) relative to a number of different issues, including law enforcement, on which they have similar positions and common interests; and WHEREAS, in order to more effectively address law enforcement needs of the cities, the Valley Cities have joined together to seek monies to enhance their law enforcement needs. The Valley Cities are eligible to receive grant funds in the amount of ninety-eight thousand seven hundred and twenty-three dollars ($98,723.00); and WHEREAS, in June 2006 the City of Renton entered into an Interlocal Agreement among Green River, White River and Puyallup River Valley Cities for Cooperation in Acceptance and Use of Department of Justice/ Cops More Grant so that the grant funds could be received (Resolution No. 3817); and WHEREAS, the City of Renton now agrees to the retainage of CBG Communications Inc. as the consultant and to the City of Auburn serving as agent for the Valley Cities to provide 1 RESOLUTION NO. oversight of the consultant's services of developing a fiber optic cabling and wireless strategy for deployment in the participating communities; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement entitled "Agreement for Consulting Services." PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1209:9/6/06:ma 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2006 BUDGET BY REFLECTING INCOMING REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,610 FROM THE BOEING COMPANY AND $33,080 FROM HARVEST TRANSWESTERN LAKESHORE TO COVER EXPENSES AMOUNTING TO $37,690 FOR CONTRACTS WITH BLUMEN CONSULTING FOR BOEING PLANT SUB-DISTRICT 1A AND 1B CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS WORK AND SUBSEQUENT APPEAL. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Appropriation in the General Governmental Fund is hereby increased as follows: Fund 2006 Budget 2006 Original Increase Adjusted Budget Budget R000.000000.000.3450.0084.00.000002 $40,725 $37,690 $78,415 E000.000000.005.5190.0090.41.000002 $57,300 $37,690 $94,990 Source of funds: $4,610 from The Boeing Company and $33,080 from Harvest Transwestem Lakeshore SECTION II. Funds for these line items are hereby added to the 2006 budget. SECTION IIL This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk 1 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. veld Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1281.8/15/06:ma *41004 NigiO 2 i td/fIc- /zJ -oil WneVIVii g12 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON /IdO,kal 9-//-o?DD,6 ORDINANCE NO. 5V q AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2006 BUDGET BY TRANSFERRING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,000 FROM THE 2005 UNDESIGNATED HOTEL/MOTEL FUND, WITH $50,000 GOING TO PRAVDA FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING A RENTON MARKETING VIDEO UNDER THE COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN, AND $10,000 TO COVER CONTRACTS WITH HAMILTON/SAUNDERSON AND THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Appropriation in the General Governmental Fund is hereby increased as follows: 2006 Original Budget Increase 2006 Adjusted Fund Budget Budget Tourism $100,000 $10,000 $110,000 E110.000000.000.5570.0030.41.000002 N Marketing $132,500 $50,000 $182,500 '1u E110.000000.000.5570.0080.52.000000 Source of funds: 2005 Hotel/Motel Fund 110 Undesignated Fund Balance SECTION H. Funds for this line item are hereby added to the 2006 budget and hereby removed from the 2005 Hotel/Motel Fund 110 undesignated fund balance. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. 1 ORDINANCE NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1282:8/25/06:ma 2 J redia /01//,,We6, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ��op� ��a00� ORDINANCE NO. 3a?a 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2006 BUDGET TO AUTHORIZE $20,000 FROM GOLF COURSE FUND BALANCE TO APPROPRIATE FOR WATER RIGHT ATTORNEY FEES. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The appropriation in the Golf Course Fund is hereby increased as follows: Fund 2006 Original Budget 2006 Adjusted Budget Increase Budget 404 $2,421,880 $20,000 $2,441,880 SECTION H. This project will be funded by the Golf Course Fund prior year revenue. SECTION HI. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage, approval, and five(5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor 1 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1276:7/27/06:ma 2 151 & ta'ih / //?Do , * fevivd CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 4a/0 /eat 4971 W 4' ORDINANCE NO. SA e2/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE I (ADMINISTRATIVE) AND CHAPTERS 5 AND 9 OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY UPDATING THE DEFINITIONS OF UNFIT, OR ABANDONED STRUCTURES, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 1997 UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. New subsections 1-3-4.A.3.1 and 3.2,of Chapter 3, Remedies and Penalties, of Title I(Administrative)of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"are hereby added,to read as follows: 3.1 BUILDING: Any building, dwelling, structure, or mobile home, factory-built house,or part thereof,built for the support,shelter or enclosure of persons,animals, chattels or property of any kind. 3.2 BUILDING OFFICIAL: The building official of the City of Renton or any of his or her authorized deputies and representatives. SECTION II. A new subsection, 1-3-4.A.7.1, of Chapter 3, Remedies and Penalties,of Title I (Administrative)of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby added,to read as follows: 7.1 DIRECTOR: The Director of the Development Services Division, or his or her authorized deputies and representatives. 1 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION III. A new subsection, 1-3-4.A.8.1,of Chapter 3, Remedies and Penalties,of Title I (Administrative)of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby added, to read as follows: 8.1 HEARING EXAMINER: The individual authorized to hear appeals for the City of Renton. SECTION IV. A new subsection, 1-3-4.A.l 1.c(22), of Chapter 3, Remedies and Penalties,of Title I (Administrative)of Ordinance No.4260 entitled"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby added, to read as follows: (22) Unfit or abandoned structure: Any structure, which has been damaged by fire, weather, earth movement, or other causes, and which is not fit for occupation, and has been abandoned or unoccupied by lawful tenants for a period of 90 days; or where the cost of repair exceeds the value of the structure once repaired; or such a damaged structure whose owner shows no intention of completing or making substantial progress on completing such repairs within 90 days. Included within this definition shall be any dwellings which are unfit for human habitation,and buildings, structures, and premises or portions thereof which are unfit for other uses due to dilapidation,disrepair, structural defects,defects increasing the hazards of fire, accidents, or other calamities, inadequate ventilation and uncleanliness,inadequate light or sanitary facilities, inadequate drainage, overcrowding, or due to other conditions which are inimical to the health and welfare of the residents of the City of Renton. SECTION V. A new chapter, 1-3-5, Unfit Dwellings Buildings and Structures, of Chapter 3, Remedies and Penalties, of Title I (Administrative) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled 2 ORDINANCE NO. "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby added,to read as follows: 1-3-5 UNFIT DWELLINGS,BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES. A. Purpose It is found that there exist,in the City of Renton,dwellings that are unfit for human habitation, and buildings and structures that are unfit for other uses due to dilapidation, disrepair, structural defects,defects increasing the hazards of fire, accidents or other calamities, inadequate ventilation, inadequate light or sanitary facilities, inadequate drainage, overcrowding, or due to other conditions that are inimical to the health and welfare of the residents. It is further the purpose of this ordinance to provide a means of demolishing structures heavily damaged by fire, weather, earth movement or other causes,which have been allowed to sit in the damaged condition without repair for an extended period of time as set forth in this ordinance. B. Repair, Vacation,Demolition,or Abatement of Unfit Dwellings,Buildings and Structures 1. Incorporation by Reference. Chapter 35.80 RCW is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth, at least one copy of which has been filed with the City Clerk. 2. Standards for Repair, Vacation or Demolition. A. The following standards shall be followed in substance by the director or the hearing examiner in ordering repair, vacation or demolition of unfit buildings: (1) If the unfit building can reasonably be repaired so that it will no longer exist in violation of the teens of this chapter, it shall be ordered repaired by the director or, on appeal,by the hearing examiner. 3 ORDINANCE NO. (2) If the unfit building is in such condition as to make it dangerous to the health,morals,safety or general welfare of its occupants, neighbors or the general public,it shall be ordered to be vacated by the director or, on appeal, by the hearing examiner. (3) If the unfit building is fifty percent damaged or decayed or deteriorated in value it shall be demolished. Value as used herein shall be the valuation placed upon the building or structure for purposes of general taxation. (4) If the unfit building cannot be repaired so that it will no longer exist in violation of the terms of this chapter it shall be demolished. (5) If the unfit building is a fire hazard, existing or erected in violation of the terms of this chapter or any other ordinance of the City of Renton or the laws of the state of Washington, it shall be demolished, provided the fire hazard is not eliminated by the owner within a reasonable time. B. If the director or hearing examiner orders the building to be demolished, it shall also require that the land be suitably filled and cleared, and that the property immediately be vacated and secured as completely as possible pending demolition. C. Complaint lf, after a preliminary investigation of any building or premises, the building official finds that it is unfit, substandard,boarded-up and unfit for use as a dwelling, building or structure, or required to be boarded-up and unfit for use as a dwelling,building or structure;he or she shall cause the owners to be served,either personally or;.1)1 tib , ,i «I ;-tii i c c:ai a+; >c ,13t:, ,..: by first class and certified mail, with return receipt requested, and shall post in a conspicuous place on such property, a complaint stating in what respect such building is unfit for human habitation or other use or is substandard or that it is or should be a boarded-up building, together with the 4 ORDINANCE NO. corrective action to be taken and the fees and costs to be paid. If the whereabouts of such person is unknown and cannot be ascertained by the building official in the exercise of reasonable diligence, he or she shall make an affidavit to that effect, then the serving of such complaint or order upon such persons may be made either by personal service or by mailing a copy of the notice and orders by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to each person at the address appearing on the last equalized tax assessment roll of the county where the property is located, or at the address known to the county assessor. A copy of the notice and order shall also be mailed, addressed to each person,at the address of the building involved in the proceedings, if different, and to each person or party having a recorded right,title, estate, lien, or interest in the property. Such complaint shall contain a notice that a hearing will be held before the director at a place therein fixed,not less than 10 days nor more than 30 days after the service of such complaint;that all parties in interest shall be given the right to file an answer to the complaint, and to appear in person or otherwise and give testimony at the time and place fixed in the complaint. A copy of such complaint shall also be filed with the auditor of King County, and such filing of the complaint or order shall have the force and effect of a lis pendens. D. Voluntary correction 1. The building official may secure voluntary correction in the form and manner any as authorized by RMC 1-3-3.B. 2. The voluntary correction agreement is a contract between the City and the owner in which such person agrees to abate the violation within a specified time and according to specified conditions. The voluntary agreement must include: a. The name and address of the owner or person bound under the contract; 5 ORDINANCE NO. b. The street address and a legal description sufficient to identify the premises; c. A description of the violation and a reference to the provisions of this code or other regulation that has been violated; d. The corrective action to be taken,and a date and time by which the corrective action must be completed; e. An agreement by the owner that the City of Renton may abate the violation and recover its costs and expenses pursuant to this chapter if all terms of the voluntary agreement are not met; f. A waiver by the owner of his right to any administrative or legal review of the violations, the appropriate corrections,and all other rights except those in the agreement; g. The administrative costs to be paid and by whom; h. Permission by the owner for the City to enter upon the property at any time or, in the case of occupied property, at reasonable times until the violation is abated; and i. An acknowledgement. The building official may grant an extension for corrections or modifications if the owner has been diligent and made substantial progress but has been unavoidably delayed. E. Hearings Before the Director 1. Unless,prior to the time fixed for hearing in the complaint issued by the building official, arrangements satisfactory to the building official for the repair,demolition,vacation or re-occupancy of the building or premises are made, including the proper application for permits. 6 ORDINANCE NO. or abatement of the unfit building,the director shall hold a hearing for the purpose of determining the immediate disposition of the building or premises. The hearing will be canceled if the building official approves the completed corrective action at least 48 hours before the scheduled hearing. 2. The director shall conduct an administrative hearing. The hearing shall be governed by the civil rules of superior court for the state of Washington, but the strict rules of it Deleted:testimony evidence shall not be applied. Any party wishing toshall be sworn on oath. The building official or his or her designee and the owner may participate as parties in the hearing and each party may call witnesses. Any complainant or person affected by the violation may appear and present evidence. The City shall have the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of evidence that a violation has occurred and that the required corrective action is reasonable. 3. The director may determine that a dwelling, building, structure, or premises is unfit for human habitation or other use if he or she finds that conditions exist in such dwelling, building, structure, or premises that are dangerous or injurious to the health or safety of the occupants of such dwelling, building, structure, or premises, the occupants of neighboring dwellings, or other residents of the City. Such conditions may include the following, without limitations: Defects therein increasing the hazards of fire or accident; inadequate ventilation, light,or sanitary facilities, dilapidation, disrepair, structural defects, uncleanliness, overcrowding, or inadequate drainage. The minimum standards to be applied are those contained in this chapter,Title IV RMC, and all standardized codes adopted by the City of Renton. 4. The director shall issue an order to the owner that contains the following information: 7 ORDINANCE NO. • a. The decision regarding the alleged violation including findings of fact and conclusions based thereon. b. The required corrective action. c. The date and time by which the correction must be completed. d. The costs assessed. e. The date and time after which the City may proceed with abatement of the unlawful condition if the required correction is not completed. f. The decision shall state that the owner has the right to appeal to the hearing examiner within 30 days and, unless he does appeal or comply with the order, the City shall have the power, without further notice or proceedings,to vacate and secure the building or premises and do any act required of the owner in the order of the director, and to charge any expenses incurred thereby to the owner and assess them against the property. 5. The director shall mail by certified mail, a copy of the decision to the owner or occupant within 10 working days following the hearing. 6. If no appeal is filed,a copy of such order shall be filed with the auditor of King County and shall be a final order. F. Hearings Before the Hearing Examiner I. The purpose of the hearing examiner under this chapter is to review the proceedings and orders of the director and to affirm,modify or vacate said orders. 2. Within 30 days from the date of service and posting of an order of the director,an owner may file an appeal with the hearing examiner by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk setting out the reasons he believes the findings or order of the director to be erroneous. There will be not less than 10 or more than 30 days from the date of said appeal or 8 ORDINANCE NO. referral and the hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be made in accord with RMC 1-10-5. The matter of the appeal will be scheduled for public hearing before the hearing examiner so as to allow 10 days notice of the hearing to the appellant and all interested parties and to permit final decision thereon to be made within 60 days after the filing of the appeal. The filing of the notice of appeal shall stay the order of the director,except so much thereof as requires temporary measures, such as securing of the building to minimize any emergent danger to the public health or safety. 3. Upon the public hearing of the appeal,the hearing examiner shall consider the file of the proceedings before the director and such other evidence as may be presented. After the hearing,the examiner may affirm, modify or vacate the order of the director, or may continue the matter for further deliberation or presentation of additional evidence. Normally the hearing examiner will not accept new evidence or evidence not made available to the director in the absence of good cause. The examiner's review is on the record, not de novo. The determination of the hearing examiner shall be accorded substantial weight. If the owner fails to appear at the scheduled hearing,the director will enter an order finding that the violation occurred and assess the appropriate costs. A record of the proceedings shall be made and kept for one year or until the matter is final, whichever is longer. The examiner shall cause his findings of fact and order to be made in writing; provided, he may adopt the findings and order of the director,or so much thereof as supports its decision. Such findings and order shall be served and posted in the same manner as an order of the director. In addition, such notice shall state that the owner has the right to petition the superior court of King County for appropriate relief within 30 days after the order becomes final. 9 ORDINANCE NO. G. Enforcement 1. The order of the director or the hearing examiner may prescribe times within which demolition shall be commenced or completed. If the action is not commenced or completed within the prescribed time, or if no time is prescribed within the time for appeal, the building official may seek the appropriate warrant from King County Superior Court to enter upon the property, and cause the building to be demolished and the premises to be suitably filled and cleared as provided by RMC 1-10-4. If satisfactory progress has been made and sufficient evidence is presented that the work will be completed within a reasonable time, the director or the hearing examiner may extend the time for completion of the work. If satisfactory or substantial progress has not been made,the director or the examiner may cause the building to be demolished and the premises suitably filled and cleared as provided by RMC 1-10-4. The building official shall let bids for any demolition in accordance with RMC 1-10-10. 2. If other action ordered by the director or the hearing examiner is not taken within the time prescribed, or if no time is specified within the time for appeal,the building official may seek the appropriate warrant from King County Superior Court to enter upon the property, and cause the action to be taken. 3. If the building official deems it necessary to have the building secured as an interim measure for the protection of the public health and welfare while pending action, he may so order. If the owner is unable or unwilling to secure the building within 48 hours, the building official may seek the appropriate warrant from King County Superior Court to enter upon the property, and secure the building. 4. If the owner is unable to comply with the director's or hearing examiner's order within the time required, and the time for appeals to the examiner or petition to the court has 10 ORDINANCE NO. passed, he or`1e may, for good and sufficient cause beyond his or fur control,request in writing an extension of time. The director or the hearing examiner may grant a reasonable extension of time after a finding that the delay was beyond the control of the owners. There shall be no appeal or petition from the director's or the hearing examiner's ruling on an extension of time. H. Costs 1. Actual costs and expenses will be assessed in accord with the provisions of this section,including the cost of repairs, alterations, improvements, vacating and closing, removal, and/or demolition. Actual costs shall include the costs of staff time, including overhead, contracted engineering fees or consultants' fees,relocation assistance payments including interest and penalties,and any attorney's fees incurred in having the dwelling, building or structure declared unfit, in any hearing before the director or Hearing Examiner, or in Superior Court obtaining any warrant for entry or order of abatement. 2. The costs of abatement,repair, alteration or improvement,or vacating and closing, or removal or demolition, when borne by the City, shall be assessed against the real property upon which such costs were incurred as a lien unless paid. 3. Bids for demolition shall be let only to a licensed contractor. The contract documents shall provide that the value of the materials and other salvage of the property shall be credited against the costs of the demolition. The contract documents may require bidders to estimate the salvage value of the property and,by claiming the salvage, reduce the amount of his bid accordingly. Such bids may be let prior to the time for compliance or appeal, but shall not be binding or accepted until the order for demolition is final. The building official shall have the authority to sign the contract on behalf of the City. 11 ORDINANCE NO. 4. There shall be charged against the owner and assessed against the property of any boarded-up building an annual inspection fee of$250.00. Such fee shall be payable at the time the building becomes a boarded-up building. The hearing examiner or director shall order a refund of the proportional amount not due if the building is reoccupied or demolished. Subsequent annual fees shall be payable on or before the time the preceding annual fee has been exhausted. 5. In addition to actual abatement costs, the following administrative fees shall be assessed and collected in the same manner: a. Where abatement is accomplished prior to director hearing: $300.00; Provided,the building official may waive these fees if abatement is complete 48 hours prior to a director hearing. b. Where abatement is accomplished subsequent to or less than 48 hours prior to a director hearing: $1,500; c. Where abatement is accomplished following breach of an agreement or understanding between a property owner and building official, director, or hearing examiner: $3,000. d. Where the abatement is accomplished by the City following hearing or default of the property owner: $3,000. 6. The building official, director, or hearing examiner may modify the time or methods of payment of such expenses as the condition of the property and the circumstances of the owner may warrant. In setting costs,they may reduce the costs to an owner who has acted in good faith and would suffer extreme financial hardship. They may increase costs if it appears 12 ORDINANCE NO. that the scheduled costs are inadequate to make the City whole with respect to a particular violation. I. Unfit Building Abatement Fund A fund shall be created to retain the moneys collected pursuant to this chapter and pay for any demolitions and unfit building abatements undertaken by the City. J. Permit Required Any work including construction,repairs or alterations under this chapter to rehabilitate any building or structure,may require a permit in accord with the provisions of RMC Title 4. K. Rules and Regulations The director may make and promulgate such rules and regulations as will effectuate the purposes of this chapter and do substantial justice. L. Penalties It shall be unlawful and a violation of this chapter to: 1. Occupy or suffer to be occupied any building or premises ordered vacated; or 2. Fail to comply with any order issued pursuant to this chapter. Any person having been found to have violated this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable pursuant to RMC 1-3-1. M. Emergencies The provisions of this chapter shall not prevent the director or any other officer of the City of Renton or other governmental unit from taking any other action, summary or otherwise, necessary to eliminate or minimize an imminent danger to the health or safety of any person or property. 13 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION VI. Section 4-9-050.A of Chapter 9, Permits—Specific,of Title IV (Development Regulations)of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as follows: A. ADOPTION BY REFERENCE: The"1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings"published by the International Conference of Building Officials, of which one copy has heretofore been filed and is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and made available for examination by the public, is hereby adopted by reference. SECTION VII. Section 4-9-050.D.1 of Chapter 9, Permits—Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations)of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Authority and Process: The Board of Appeals, under Chapter 5 of the"1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings"shall be the Hearing Examiner. Appeals may be tiled pursuant to RMC 4-8-110, Appeals. SECTION VIII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of ,2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker,Mayor 14 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Date of Publication: Deleted:8/I 4/06 ORD.1273::) 1 ! ')G:ma 15