HomeMy WebLinkAboutEnergize Eastside LUA18-000055 (7)From:Jill Ding
To:"Jeanne DeMund"
Subject:Energize Eastside, LUA18-000055
Date:Tuesday, November 26, 2019 2:06:55 PM
Dear Jeanne,
Thank you for your comments on Puget Sound Energy’s Energize Eastside Conditional Use Permit
Application, your comments have been included in the official file for consideration by the decision
maker. In addition, you have been added as a party of record for this project, as a party of record,
you will receive copies of correspondence from the City on this project. Your original email to me
included concerns related to lack of project benefits to Renton, project need, safety concerns with
respect to pole proximity to the Olympic pipeline, tree removal, wood pole repurposing, visual
degradation, and other less costly options for energy reliability. My responses to your comments are
provided below:
1. Project Will Not Benefit Renton: I asked PSE to provide a response to your comment that
the proposed project would not benefit the City of Renton, here is their response: ” PSE
respectfully disagrees with the statement that the project is to address only electrical needs
in downtown Bellevue. The electrical grid is interconnected and therefore, all of the Eastside
cities, including Renton, will benefit from the improved reliability that will result from the
Energize Eastside project.”
2. Project Need: The proposed transmission line upgrade is permitted within the City of
Renton subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) by the Hearing Examiner.
The City’s regulations do not require that the applicant demonstrate that the project in
needed in order for a Conditional Use Permit to be granted. However, PSE has conducted
studies regarding the need of the project and has made those studies available for City staff
and the public to review.
3. Pipeline Safety: Safety concerns regarding transmission line pole proximity to the Olympic
Pipeline is a concern that is shared by the City and was studied extensively during the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process. Appendix J of the Final EIS addresses many of
these comments (see page J1-28 and J1- 51). In addition, sections 4.9, 5.9, 6.12, 7.9, 8.9, and
Appendix I of the FEIS address pipeline safety. The EIS established potential mitigation
measures that would be adopted as project conditions focused on project safety in proximity
to the Olympic Pipeline.
4. Tree Removal: The City will review the proposal for compliance with the adopted Tree
Retention and Land Clearing Regulations. As the proposed transmission line upgrade is
proposed within PSE’s existing transmission line corridor, fewer trees will be required to be
removed than if PSE were proposing a new corridor. Although vegetation will be removed
within the corridor as part of the project, PSE is proposing to replace removed trees with
transmission line compatible species. Outside of the corridor, opportunities exist to replace
removed trees with taller growing species.
5. Wood Pole Repurposing: I asked PSE to respond to your concerns regarding the
repurposing of the existing wood transmission line poles, here is their response: “To the
extent practicable, PSE will work on repurposing the removed poles; however, over the
serviceable life of the Energize Eastside project, which is more than 100 years, the amount of
solid waste will decrease as the serviceable life of wood poles is typically around 40 years.”
6. Visual Degradation: Regarding potential “visual degradation” or more specifically visual and
scenic view impacts, the FEIS states (at 4.2-44): “Overall, impacts to the aesthetic
environment from the Renton Segment would be less-than significant. Although the poles
would typically be taller (up to 40 feet taller depending on the pole location and
configuration) and larger in diameter than existing poles, the segment would be located
entirely within PSE’s existing corridor, resulting in low contrast with existing conditions.
Although adopted policies address general aesthetic qualities and public views, overall
viewer sensitivity is considered low because development in the area has all occurred
around the existing transmission lines, and the project would not be inconsistent with
policies related to aesthetics and public views. Impacts to the aesthetic environment would
be less-than-significant.”
Additionally, the FEIS states:
“Impacts to scenic views would be less-than-significant because the degree of additional
obstruction would be minimal compared with existing conditions.”
7. Lower Cost Alternatives: The City’s CUP process does not require that the applicant identify
alternatives to the project proposal. However, as part of the EIS process PSE was required to
study other alternatives, including conservation/energy efficiency, new generation, and
batteries. These alternatives were eventually eliminated because they did not solve the
problem, did not meet federal planning standards, and would be difficult to permit, or rely
on voluntary participation. Here is a link to the submitted Eastside System Energy Storage
Alternatives Assessment submitted by PSE:
https://edocs.rentonwa.gov/Documents/DocView.aspx?
id=1338646&dbid=0&repo=CityofRenton
A public hearing on the proposal has been tentatively scheduled for December 17th at 9:00 am in the
City Council Chambers located on the 7th floor of City Hall, you may wish to attend and testify.
Please let me know if you have additional questions regarding this project.
Thank you,
Jill Ding
Senior Planner
City of Renton
Community and Economic Development
6th floor
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
425-430-6598
jding@rentonwa.gov