The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES 4398 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 4398 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2020 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act encourages planning for open space and recreational needs of a community to be integrated with planning for other needs; and WHEREAS, the 2020 Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan ("the 2020 Plan") is compatible with the intent of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS,the City began the update process for the 2020 Plan in January of 2019; and WHEREAS, the 2020 Plan has been developed with extensive community outreach in conjunction with residents, property owners, stakeholders, local businesses, community partners, public and private agencies and institutions, and non-profit organizations; and WHEREAS, parks create opportunities for recreation, connecting people and building community, protecting natural resources and habitat, offering places for quiet reflection, and experiencing nature in a natural setting; and WHEREAS, the 2020 Plan is a comprehensive update of the 2011 Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. It represents a collaborative effort between the Community Services and Community and Economic Development Departments with support from all City departments, and reflects the public's desire to provide the opportunity for the community to connect to, participate in, support and encourage a healthy environment and active lifestyle; and WHEREAS, the 2020 Plan creates a twenty (20)-year vision for parks, indoor and outdoor recreation facilities and programming, and natural areas; describes current and 1 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 future needs; and identifies policies, implementation strategies and an investment program to enhance and sustain parks, recreation and natural areas as critical of a livable community; and WHEREAS, updating and adopting this plan maintains the City's eligibility for state and federal grant funding for a six (6)-year time frame; and WHEREAS, the 2020 Plan was developed in conjunction with a citizen body Steering Committee; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Parks Commission and Planning Commission for investigation, study, and review; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 4, 2019, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council hereby adopts the 2020 Plan a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and asks that the Administration draw up a work program to begin implementing the Plan. The 2020 Plan shall remain in full force and effect until further revised, amended, and modified as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 27th day of January, 2020. Jason . Seth, Cit erk 2 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 27th day of January, 2020. Armondo Pavone, Mayor oomIti lb Approved as to form: `.\`` o� R� �� Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES.1834:1/21/2020 � %SATED s •s 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 EXHIBIT "A" PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN 4 PARKS, RECREATION &NATURAL AREAS PLAN Renton Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan FINAL DRAFT JANU ARY 2020RESOLUTION NO. 4398 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION &NATURAL AREAS PLAN Renton Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan FINAL DRAFT JANUARY 2020RESOLUTION NO. 4398 II | CITY OF RENTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mayor Armondo Pavone Chief Administrative Officer Robert Harrison City Council Ruth Pérez, Council President Randy Corman Ryan McIrvin Valerie O’Halloran Ed Prince Kim-Khánh Văn Council Position 2 (vacant) Parks Commission Cynthia Burns Al Dieckman Larry Reymann Tim Searing Shun Takano Troy Wigestrand Marlene Winter Planning Commission Angelina Benedetti Mara Fiksdal David Fleetwood Shannon Matson Kevin Poole Charles Seil Project Team Erica Schmitz, Community Services Department, Parks Planning Manager Leslie Betlach, Community Services Department, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director Katie Buchl-Morales, Community & Economic Development Department, Assistant Planner Angie Mathias, Community & Economic Development Department, Long Range Planning Manager Steering Committee Julio Amador, Renton Citizen Mary Clymer, Renton Arts Commission Marjorie Cochran-Reep, Renton Senior Advisory Board Al Dieckman, Renton Parks Commission Bob Elliot, Renton Non-Motorized Transportation Advisory Committee Mara Fiksdal, Renton Planning Commission Alisa Louie, Renton School Board Member Pete Maas, Renton Non-Motorized Transportation Advisory Committee Larry Reymann, Renton Parks Commission Erica Richey, Adult Active Recreation Don Sando, Youth Active Recreation Kathy Ulrich, Communities in Schools of Renton Inclusion Task Force Hamdi Abdulle Violet Aesquivel Julio Amador Benjamin Bunyatipanon Suad Farole Linda Hoste Alicia Ing Rupinder Kaur Linet Madeja-Bravo Pastor Caleb Mayberry Dr. Kevin McCarthy Jackie Nguyen Jennifer O’Neal Council President Ruth Pérez Rolly Polintan Kevin Poole Councilmember Ed Prince Oleg Pynda Ted Rodriguez Vasudha Sharma Balwant Singh Jamian L. Smith Rev. Dr. Linda Smith Menka Soni Monique Taylor Swan Duc Tran Kim-Khánh Văn A special “Thank You” to everyone who attended a community open house or participated in the planning process via the community priority survey, online open house, online interactive map, project website, or direct contact to the City by email or telephone. We appreciate your comments and plan support. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | III ACKNOWLEDGMENTSACKNOWLEDGMENTS Inclusive Outreach Partners Hamdi Abdulle Violet Aesquivel Julio Amador Rupinder Kaur Monique Taylor Swan Stakeholders James Alberson, Chamber of Commerce Board, President Victoria García Tamayo, Kaiser Permanente, Manager, Community Health Kim J. Wicklund, Kaiser Permanente, Director, Community Health & Benefit Millie Phung, Renton Housing Authority, Development Specialist Rocale Timmons, SECO Development, Inc., Sr. Vice President of Planning & Development Alisa Winkler, Renton School District, K-5 Science Facilitator External Recreation Service Providers Steve Beck, Starfire Sports, Co-Founder, Secretary and Director Robert Eaton, City of Tukwila Parks and Recreation Matthew Feldmeyer, Renton School District, Facilities Director, Parks and Recreation Manager Dani Hastings, Coal Creek Family, YMCA, Community Engagement and Volunteer Director Brian Levenhagen, City of Kent Recreation, Deputy Parks Director Administrative Services Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator Jason Seth, City Clerk/Public Records Officer City Attorney Shane Moloney Community & Economic Development Chip Vincent, Community & Economic Development Administrator Amanda Askren, Property and Technical Services Manager Katie Buchl-Morales, Assistant Planner Jennifer Henning, Planning Director Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager Aaron Raymond, GIS Analyst II Community Services Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator Margie Beitner, Community Services Administration, Administrative Secretary I Steve Brown, Parks Maintenance Manager Donna Eken, Program Coordinator Roberta Graver, Community Services Administration, Administrative Assistant Ian Gray, Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager Drey Hicks, Neighborhood Coordinator Cailín Hunsaker, Parks & Trails Director Lisa McMartin, Recreation Systems Technician Jeff Minisci, Facilities Director Carrie Nass, Recreation & Neighborhoods Manager Andy O’Brien, Recreation Supervisor Maryjane Van Cleave, Recreation & Neighborhoods Director Alan Wyatt, Capital Projects Manager Public Affairs & Communications Preeti Shridhar, Deputy Public Affairs Administrator Sheila Cowley, Communications Specialist I Benita Horn, Inclusion & Equity Consultant Karl Hurst, Print/ Mail Supervisor Dave Neubert, Communications Manager Consultant: MIG, Inc. Lauren Schmitt, Principal Ryan Mottau, Sr. Project Manager Molly Cooney-Mesker, Project Manager Brice Maryman, Landscape Architect Casey Howard, Landscape Designer Jamillah Jordan, Community Engagement Specialist EMC Research: Ian Stewart & Riley Jones Special thank you to Mike Hamilton for photos of Renton’s wildlife and habitat. Meadow Crest Accessible Playground photos courtesy of Robb Williamson. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 IV | CITY OF RENTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments ii Table of Contents iv Executive Summary vii Introduction xvii Purpose of the Plan ..............................................................................................xviii Relationship to other Planning Efforts ...............................................................xix Plan Development ...................................................................................................xx The Future of Renton’s Parks System 1 Vision .............................................................................................................................3 Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................3 Existing Conditions 11 Renton Today ..............................................................................................................12 Providing Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas ................................................15 Park Land and Recreation Facilities .....................................................................16 Recreation Programming and Services ..............................................................27 Natural Areas ............................................................................................................30 Community Involvement 37 Key Themes ...............................................................................................................38 Public Involvement Activities ................................................................................44 City Meetings and Coordination..........................................................................50 Community Needs 51 Washington’s Recreation and Conservation Office Guidelines ..................52 Park Needs .................................................................................................................53 Park Land System-Wide ..........................................................................................57 Recreation Facility Needs .......................................................................................61 Indoor Programmable Spaces .............................................................................65 Recreation Programming Needs .........................................................................68 Natural Area and Resource Needs .......................................................................71 Staffing Needs ...........................................................................................................73 Summary of Needs ..................................................................................................75 Recommendations 77 System-Wide Recommendations .........................................................................78 Recommendations by Community Planning Area ...........................................87 1 2 3 4 5 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | V ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Implementation Plan 117 Decision Making Tools ..........................................................................................118 Capital Projects List ...............................................................................................125 Program Projects List ............................................................................................135 Implementation Strategies ...................................................................................137 Funding Strategies .................................................................................................139 Monitoring, Reviewing and Updating ................................................................148 Concept Plans 149 Black River Riparian Forest ..................................................................................152 Cleveland Richardson Property .......................................................................154 East Plateau Community Park .............................................................................156 Edlund Property ......................................................................................................158 Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center .....................................................160 Kennydale Lions Park ............................................................................................162 May Creek Park.......................................................................................................164 Tiffany Park/Cascade Park Connection ............................................................166 Riverside: Tri-Park (Cedar River Park, Liberty Park, N.A.R.CO Property) 168 Windsor Hills Park ..................................................................................................170 Bibliography 173 Glossary Terms 175 Maps Existing Parks and Natural Areas Map .................................................................21 Developed Park Access Map ...............................................................................56 Developed Park Access & Residential Density Map ......................................58 Trailhead Access Map ............................................................................................60 Sports Field Access ................................................................................................62 Natural Area Access Map.......................................................................................70 Tables and Figures Table 2.1: Race and Ethnicity 2000-2014 City of Renton ................................14 Table 2.2: Park Land by Classification City of Renton .....................................17 Table 2.3: City of Renton Sports Fields by User ..............................................26 Table 3.1: Open House #2 Combined Results on Park Priorities .................46 Table 3.2: Open House #2 Combined Results on Event Priorities .............47 Table 4.1: Recreation and Conservation Office LOS Tool ...............................54 Table 4.2: Park Acreage Standards .....................................................................57 Table 4.3: Park Land Needs Based on Level of Service Standard .............59 Table 4.4: Types of Trail Access Points ................................................................61 Table 4.5: Community Services Department: Divisions and Responsibilities ...........................................................................................................................73 6 7 TABLE OF CONTENTSRESOLUTION NO. 4398 VI | CITY OF RENTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Table 6.1: Ranked Project List ..........................................................................................126 Table 6.2: Capital Cost Summary ....................................................................................133 Table 6.3: Inflation Projections .........................................................................................134 Table 6.4: Operating Cost Summary ..............................................................................135 Table 6.5: Program Project List ........................................................................................136 Figure 3.1: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Funding Priorities ..........41 Figure 3.2: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Facility Investment Priorities ......................................................................................................................43 Figure 3.3: Community Priority Survey, Results on Most Frequently Used Programs ....................................................................................................................45 Figure 4.1: Sports Field Preferences ................................................................................63 Figure 4.2: Open House #2 Online and In-Person, 2019 Community Priority Investment by Park Type ........................................................................................72 Figure 5.1: Community Planning Areas ...........................................................................87 Figure 6.1: Natural Area Management Continuum.....................................................122 Appendices Appendix A: Park and Facility Inventory .......................................................................177 A-1: Renton Park System Inventory ��179 A-2: Renton School District Facilties ��181 A-3: Field Inventory��183 Appendix B: Decision Making Tools ...............................................................................185 Design Guidelines ��187 Natural Area Evaluation Tool ��197 Prioritization Criteria ��202 Capital and Operations Cost M ��207 Appendix C: Project List and Cost Model ��211 C-1: Ranked Project List and Cost Model ��213 C-2: Cost Model Support Material ��221 C-3: Project List and Cost Model by Park Category ��225 C-4: Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area ��233 Appendix D: Connecting with the Community ............................................................241 Appendix E: Trails Map .....................................................................................................245 Trails and Bicycle Improvements Map ��247 Appendix F: Adopting Resolution ..................................................................................249 Under Separate Cover Community-Wide Telephone Survey Final Summary, 2019 Public Input Reports/Summaries Project List Scoring Detail TABLE OF CONTENTSRESOLUTION NO. 4398 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RESOLUTION NO. 4398 VIII | CITY OF RENTON The City of Renton is growing, diversifying and maturing. To serve a changing community, the City is investing in parks, recreation facilities, programs and natural areas. This investment is guided by the community’s love and enthusiasm for the places that support Renton’s identity. Community members value Renton as a sustainable, interconnected community, with people who work together to promote its health and vitality, protect its natural resources, celebrate its character, and ensure its long-term dedication to a high quality of life. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan presents a long-term vision and goals for the City and community for the next 20 years; describes current and future needs, interests and community preferences for parks, recreation facilities and programs, and natural resources; and identifies system-based policies, implementation strategies and an investment program to enhance and sustain parks, recreation and natural areas as critical elements of a vibrant community. This plan also provides a framework to guide the City in setting priorities, making decisions and funding improvements and operations for Renton’s parks, recreation facilities and natural areas. Adoption and certification of this plan fulfills the requirements of the State of Washington Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for grant funding eligibility. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | Ix This document is structured to align with three levels of planning in Renton: the city-wide system, the Community Planning Areas and individual park sites. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan implements policies presented in the Renton Comprehensive Plan and provides specific guidance for individual Community Plans. This Plan serves as a companion to the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and complements the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. VISION Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas provide the opportunity for the community to connect to, participate in, support and encourage a healthy environment and active lifestyle. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 x | CITY OF RENTON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Goal A: Filling Gaps in Service Expand parks and recreational opportunities in areas with an identified need, in order to fill gaps in service and keep pace with future growth. Goal B: Creating a Connected System Create a connected system of parks, corridors, trails and natural areas that provides equitable access to recreation opportunities. Goal C: Building Partnerships Cultivate strong, positive partnerships at the local and regional levels with public, private and non-profit organizations to unite community efforts to develop and sustain the park system. Goal D: Creating Identity Create a distinct identity that celebrates the natural, historic and culturally diverse character of the Renton community through park and facility design, recreation programming, interpretation and education. Goal E: Ensuring a Sustainable System Ensure long-term economic and environmental sustainability in system planning, design, operation, maintenance and decision making. Goal F: Promoting Health and Community Through Programming Promote healthy and active lifestyles and build community through programs that are inclusive, fun and responsive to the needs and preferences of Renton’s diverse population. Goal G: Protecting and Conserving Natural Resources Protect, conserve and enhance Renton’s diverse natural resources for the long-term health of ecosystems, and for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Planning Process The City of Renton engaged residents, interest groups, park users, City staff and agency representatives in the development of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. These important stakeholders provided feedback through a variety of meetings, open houses, surveys, questionnaires, an interactive online mapping exercise and two rounds of inclusive engagement. These diverse outreach activities were designed to collect feedback from a variety of people, including different cultural groups, ages and interests. Over 1,800 people participated in the development of this Plan. In addition to the many public involvement activities, several key groups reviewed Plan content, provided direction and coordinated this Plan with other City policies and goals. Community Services Department staff from all divisions provided insights. Committees and commissions who provided guidance included a 12-member Steering Committee, the Parks Commission, the Mayor’s Inclusion Task Force, the Planning Commission and the Renton City Council Committee of the Whole. The resulting Plan reflects the many different priorities and interests of the Renton community. It also provides the City with the flexibility to respond to changing community demographics and needs. Recommendations The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan includes recommendations for parks and facilities across the entire City, as well as recommendations for each of the ten Community Planning Areas established by the Renton City Council. These ten areas reflect distinct communities, in terms of identity, character, physical features, existing infrastructure, services and access. Consequently, community needs for parks, recreation opportunities and natural areas also vary within these areas. This Plan provides overarching guidance for all ten of the Community Planning Areas, addressing the specific needs, priorities and character of each. PARK LAND Parks create opportunities for recreation, connecting people and building community, protecting natural resources, and offering places for quiet reflection and experiencing nature. The City of Renton strives to provide access to developed parks and trails within a RESOLUTION NO. 4398 xII | CITY OF RENTON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ten minute walk (1/2 mile) from home. Research shows this is the distance most pedestrians are willing to walk to reach a destination and is an emerging national standard. This Plan refines how that half- mile is measured and targets providing parks within a five minute walk (1/4 mile) within higher-density residential areas to recognize the increased demand for facilities created by the increased population. In addition, recommendations and conceptual designs highlight how to maximize several key publicly owned park sites, some in need of renovation and others yet undeveloped. Based on community input and analysis, the Plan recommends developing land the City has already purchased to expand access and keep up with population growth. RECREATION FACILITIES Renton’s parks offer a wide range of outdoor recreation facilities, adding recreational variety to the park system and supporting the vision for healthy and active lifestyles. The Plan recommends more recreation facilities, including additional and improved sports fields, trails, usable indoor programmable space and other specialized features, especially within existing parks. The City should continue to add variety in play experiences available in Renton, a transition that is underway with the Meadow Crest Accessible Playground and recent playground replacement projects. The focus on developing unique and varied facilities will help parks support the distinct character of each Community Planning Area. At the same time, upgrades and reinvestment in the City’s most popular parks, such as Cedar River Park, are also recommended to increase site capacity and use, while supporting Renton’s most valued park assets. NATURAL AREAS Natural areas provide a variety of public benefits including natural resource education and volunteer opportunities. City residents feel strongly about balancing public access to natural areas with the need to protect and conserve natural resources. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan recommends continuing to protect natural areas to enhance salmon habitat, the urban tree canopy and other natural resources, while improving access to these areas. Fundamentally, the community expressed a desire to have access to natural areas wherever environmentally appropriate. Renton’s natural areas are a critical link between people and their environment, building a stewardship ethic and attracting residents and businesses. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This plan recommends completing corridors, connecting existing natural areas and adding natural spaces to existing parks. The City should renew focus on understanding and managing the extensive portfolio of natural areas. The Natural Area Evaluation tool, a new addition to the Plan, will help the City prioritize management activities in natural areas. PROGRAMS AND PARTNERSHIPS Renton has a long history of providing a full-service recreation program to the community. Recreation programming connects people, builds community, fosters volunteerism and creates long term partnerships. Collaboration with public and private entities have allowed Renton to expand and enhance recreation services and programming. The Plan recommends building and strengthening these relationships to sustain existing facilities and expand recreational opportunities. A key element of this strategy includes expanding the agreement with the Renton School District to increase facility use and maximize the resources available. The City should target partners that help to expand community events and environmental programming, responding to the community’s desires. STAFFING AND SUPPORT Renton’s professional staff across all divisions are still operating under an increased workload, with responsibilities taken on during the Great Recession. Expanding the capacity of the City to provide for the community will require additional support and full time positions. Plan of Action Each of the recommended projects in this Plan will play an important role in creating the parks, recreation and natural areas system envisioned by the community. To successfully carry out these recommendations, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan includes a series of implementation tools and strategies to help focus and prioritize City efforts while allowing Renton to be flexible in responding to opportunities as they emerge. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 xIV | CITY OF RENTON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Decision Making Tools Four decision making tools are included in the Plan: 1. DESIGN GUIDELINES This tool describes what should, what could and what should not be included in the development of each park type and includes guidance about size and locations for future parks. Design guidelines pertain to the physical features of a park. The management, maintenance and operations of the sites are addressed separately. 2. NATURAL AREA EVALUATION TOOL This tool utilizes a systematic approach to prioritizing and managing natural areas. The inventory process and prioritization criteria included in this tool will help the City decide which natural areas to focus on first for natural area management plan development. 3. PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA Drawing from the extensive public input, seven criteria have been developed to evaluate how well a specific project supports the Plan’s vision and goals. Scoring a project against these criteria allows for the sorting of disparate projects into an ordered list that focuses community resources. 4. CAPITAL AND OPERATIONS COST MODEL The Capital and Operations Cost Model presents “planning level” costs identified for each project recommended in this Plan. Applying per-unit or per-acre cost assumptions, the model identifies both capital and operations costs to develop a new project and operate and maintain it in the future. CAPITAL PROJECTS AND COSTS Looking at the system as a whole, the total capital investment needed to implement all of the recommended projects is estimated at nearly $333,000,000 (in 2019 dollars). Of this total, 12% of funds are for land acquisition totaling $41 million, 28% is for the development of new parks totaling $85 million and 10% of funds are for new sports fields totaling $33 million. Also included in this total is nearly $29 million in major maintenance and reinvestment, 9% of the total, for parks and facilities throughout the system. These are very large, long-term investments and it is important to create methods to break this cost down into more manageable pieces. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommended projects in this Plan are summarized by park site; planning level costs have been totaled up by park classification and Community Planning Area. Additionally, each of the projects has been evaluated against the seven prioritization criteria. By applying the Prioritization Criteria tool, the Plan includes a ranked list of projects as they align with the plan goals, providing an order of priority for projects that can help determine what projects to pursue first. The prioritization is dynamic, intended to be revisited periodically to reflect changing circumstances and conditions. As improvements are made, the cost of operating the park system will also increase. The cost model created for this Plan includes an operating cost element that estimates the additional operating funds needed for each additional project. The impact of individual recommendations varies, but the complete system build-out will require approximately $6,800,000 in additional operating investment. Nearly one-third of this additional total will be the result of new or expanded major recreation facilities, such as a multi-generational community center and an expanded aquatic center. PROGRAMMING PROJECTS The programs and services recommended in the Plan were prioritized separately based on the same set of prioritization criteria used for capital projects. Rather than developing an exhaustive list of ongoing Renton recreation programs, these projects represent areas of programming that received special interest from the community and that represent promising future directions. Recreation programs have a reciprocal relationship with the recreation facility recommendations. As new facilities are developed, new or additional programs may need to be added to maximize their use. As new program areas are explored, improvements at parks can support these new uses and participants. Actively programming parks increases use as well as the social and health outcomes of Renton residents. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES The Plan notes specific strategies to ensure that new development contributes their fair share to improvements in the park system and that future initiatives are supported by the community. Additional strategies discuss ways in which park projects can be combined with other public services or development projects, such as transportation and stormwater, to maximize community benefits. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 xVI | CITY OF RENTON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Additionally, recreation programming serves as a community-building resource. Similarly, programs build City partnerships, especially with other major community resources such as the School District. As a final part of its action plan, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan includes a series of concept plans to illustrate how recommended facilities can fit into existing and proposed parks. These concepts were created to show one vision of how these parks can be designed, informed by the general community input of this Plan. Monitoring, Reviewing and Updating The vision, goals and objectives of this Plan should serve this community to the end of this decade and beyond. However, it will be important to check in with the community and validate or adjust the Plan for any major shifts in priorities or project opportunities. The six-year period defined by the Recreation and Conservation Office presents a good time for this check in. The implementation of this Plan will continue well past the six-year update cycle mandated by the State. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 INTRODUCTION RESOLUTION NO. 4398 xVIII | CITY OF RENTON INTRODUCTION The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan is the result of a collaborative effort between community members, staff, agency representatives and elected officials with the goal of creating a unified community vision for the future of Renton’s parks, recreation resources and natural areas. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan: • Presents a long-term vision and goals for the City’s parks, recreation and natural areas and community for the next 20 years; • Describes current and future needs, interests and community preferences for parks, recreation facilities and programs and natural resources; • Identifies system-based policies, implementation strategies and an investment program to enhance and sustain parks, recreation and natural areas as critical elements of a vibrant community; • Provides a framework to guide the City in setting priorities, making decisions and funding improvements and operations for Renton’s parks, recreation facilities and natural areas; and RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xIx • Responds to the needs of the community as well as the requirements of the State of Washington Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for grant funding eligibility. Once certified, the plan will maintain this eligibility for six years from the date of adoption. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNING EFFORTS This document is structured to align with three levels of planning: the city-wide system, the Community Planning Areas and individual park sites. This Plan implements policies presented in the Renton Comprehensive Plan and provides specific guidance for individual Community Plans. While the City’s Comprehensive Plan establishes the city-wide vision and framework, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan establishes and implements the goals and objectives. In turn, these system-wide actions and implementation strategies will guide the individual community planning efforts. Each Community Plan will create a finer level of detail about the specific needs, priorities and character of each of the ten individual Community Planning Areas. The City has other system and site-specific plans in place and in progress. This plan serves as a companion to the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and complements the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Across these plans there are many shared recommendations, including the following: • Provide a safe, healthy vibrant community (Comprehensive Plan); • Create an accessible and connected system (Trails and Bicycle Master Plan); • Enrich the community with many small scale improvements to parks, recreational opportunities (Benson Hill Community Plan); RESOLUTION NO. 4398 xx | CITY OF RENTON INTRODUCTION • Improve access to and quality of parks, recreation, and natural areas in Benson Hill, especially for youth (Benson Hill Community Plan); • Protect, enhance and improve access to the natural features and open space in the City Center including Lake Washington, the Cedar River, and its many parks and open spaces throughout the City Center (City Center Community Plan); • Assess and reimagine public spaces like the Piazza and Pavilion, and connect those spaces through an expanded regional trail system to local destinations (Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan); • Improve parks and urban trails like the Piazza and Renton Connector (Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan); • Provide active and engaging public spaces (Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan); • The Cedar Riverwalk becomes a major draw to attract residents and visitors to experience the Civic Core and Downtown (Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan); • Renton aspires to be a center for arts and culture where traditional and contemporary arts thrive and creative industries are cultivated (Arts and Culture Master Plan); and • Preserve, document, interpret, and educate about the history of greater Renton in ways that are accessible to diverse people of all ages (Renton History Museum Master Plan). PLAN DEVELOPMENT The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan was developed through the active participation of residents, interest groups, park users, City staff and agency representatives who provided feedback through a variety of meetings, open houses, surveys, questionnaires, an interactive online mapping exercise and two rounds of inclusive engagement. These diverse outreach activities were designed to collect feedback from a variety of people, including different cultural groups, ages and interests. Over 1,800 people participated in the development of this plan. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | xxI INTRODUCTION In addition to the many public involvement activities, several key groups reviewed plan content, provided direction and coordinated this plan with other City policies and goals. These committees and commissions included: • A 12-member Steering Committee, a citizen group consisting of demographically diverse members representing a range of interests and backgrounds; • The 7-member Parks Commission, overseeing park and recreation facility operations; • The 30-member Mayor’s Inclusion Task Force, 5 of whom conducted the inclusive engagement efforts for this planning process; • The 9-member Planning Commission, responsible for the oversight of land use policies and regulations; • Community Services Department staff, representing the front lines of implementing recreation programs and services, urban forestry, facilities, parks and trails maintenance, operations, planning and CIP; and • The City Council Committee of the Whole, providing additional and in-depth guidance. The resulting plan reflects the many different priorities and interests of the Renton community. It also provides the City with the flexibility to respond to changing community demographics and needs. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 xxII | CITY OF RENTON INTRODUCTION This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 1 THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARKS SYSTEM RESOLUTION NO. 4398 2 | CITY OF RENTON The City of Renton is poised to renew its commitment to and investment in city parks, recreation facilities, natural areas and recreation programming. This commitment is guided by the community’s love and enthusiasm for the places that support Renton’s identity. Community members value Renton as a sustainable, interconnected community, with people who work together to promote its health and vitality, protect its natural resources, celebrate its character and ensure its long-term dedication to a high quality of life. THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARKS SYSTEM The vision and goals presented in the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan are intended to illustrate the community’s desired future. This framework gives the Community Services Department flexibility in leveraging opportunities to achieve the desired goals. The vision, goals and objectives in this Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan were affirmed and refined through the public engagement process described in Chapter 3. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 3 VISION The community’s vision: Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas provide the opportunity for the community to connect to, participate in, support and encourage a healthy environment and active lifestyle. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Seven goals recognize the many benefits that park land, recreation facilities and programs and natural areas offer the community. These goals direct the long-term improvement, maintenance and programming of the parks, recreation and natural areas system. Each goal includes objectives – statements of actionable direction – that can be used to measure progress towards the goals. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 4 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER ONE GOAL A: Filling gaps in service Expand parks and recreational opportunities in areas with an identified need, in order to fill gaps in service and keep pace with future growth. Objectives A.1. Expand recreation opportunities to meet future growth needs and planned density. A.2. Develop parks that provide service to residences within ½-mile of low density residential land uses and within ¼-mile of the areas planned for high residential density. A.3. Design indoor and outdoor spaces for flexible use. A.4. Increase capacity at existing parks and recreation facilities wherever possible. A.5. Utilize Decision Making Tools to help determine planning, acquisition, development and restoration projects and priorities. A.6. Provide easily accessible information about the park system, expanding knowledge and awareness of recreation opportunities. A.7. Create park master plans with community input in conjunction with or prior to major park development projects to achieve cohesive design and efficient phasing. A.8. Explore alternative service approaches to provide recreation opportunities in parks or programmable space; leveraging the strengths and facilities of other organizations. A.9. Continue to reinvest in parks and facilities to reflect the evolving needs and desires of the community. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 5 THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARK SYSTEM GOAL B: Creating a connected system Create a connected system of parks, corridors, trails and natural areas that provides equitable access to recreation opportunities. Objectives B.1. Link parks to other community destinations in Renton and the region such as schools, parks, trails, natural areas, commercial areas and business districts. B.2. Create safe, accessible and convenient non- motorized park access. B.3. Complete transportation, recreation and habitat connections across the system. B.4. Enhance the connection between local food production and the community through education, awareness and community events. B.5. Develop and implement accessible parks, facilities and programs for all ages and abilities. B.6. Develop and implement a consistent system of wayfinding signage to help users navigate the parks, recreation and natural areas system. B.7. Encourage use of non-motorized transportation modes to access recreation opportunities. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 6 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER ONE Objectives C.1. Develop, strengthen and facilitate strong partnerships with individuals, service groups, non- profits and other agencies and organizations to expand recreation opportunities. C.2. Increase internal coordination and collaboration between City departments to maximize the public’s access to recreation opportunities. C.3. Coordinate planning, programming and operations between government agencies, local school districts and community groups to increase awareness, availability and accessibility of recreation resources. C.4. Formalize partnerships and agreements with agencies, businesses and other organizations to increase access to recreation opportunities. GOAL C: Building partnerships Cultivate strong, positive partnerships at the local and regional levels with public, private and non-profit organizations to unite community efforts to develop and sustain the park system. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 7 THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARK SYSTEM GOAL D: Creating identity Create a distinct identity that celebrates the natural, historic and culturally diverse character of the Renton community through park and facility design, recreation programming, interpretation and education. Objectives D.1. Offer programs and events that celebrate the unique features of Renton. D.2. Expand water access to the community through acquisition, facility design and programming. D.3. Integrate cultural, historic, and place-based art and interpretation within the park system. D.4. Incorporate unique features into parks and facilities to contribute to community identity. D.5. Provide opportunities to create and appreciate art throughout the park system. D.6. Showcase Renton as a regional trail hub that connects non-motorized transportation infrastructure throughout the region. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 8 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER ONE Objectives E.1. Consider long-term management, staffing resources, operations and maintenance needs when planning capital projects and creating programs. E.2. Consider the full operating impact of new park sites and features prior to their development. E.3. Consider cost recovery when developing and implementing projects and programs. E.4. Create community partnerships and encourage volunteerism that contribute to the maintenance and sustainability of the system. E.5. Balance new acquisition and development with the sustained maintenance of existing parks and facilities. E.6. Seek funding from a wide variety of sources for park acquisition, development, maintenance and program implementation. E.7. Minimize impacts to the environment by incorporating green infrastructure and promoting water and energy efficiency and storm water management in parks and facilities. E.8. Enhance community awareness and involvement in natural resource area management. E.9. Set an example in environmental stewardship by employing best management practices. GOAL E: Ensuring a sustainable system Ensure long-term economic and environmental sustainability in system planning, design, operation, maintenance and decision making. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 9 THE FUTURE OF RENTON’S PARK SYSTEM GOAL F: Promoting health and community through programming Promote healthy and active lifestyles and build community through programs that are inclusive, fun and responsive to the needs and preferences of Renton’s diverse population. Objectives F.1. Provide flexible recreation programming that adapts and responds to current trends and community desires. F.2. Expand the community’s access to fitness and health through park and facility design, formalized programs and events, social marketing and education. F.3. Provide programs and community events that encourage interaction between neighbors and celebrate the diversity of Renton. F.4. Increase community awareness of the full range of program offerings and recreation opportunities. F.5. Create and expand program opportunities through enhanced partnerships and volunteerism. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 10 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER ONE Objectives G.1. Inform the management of Renton’s natural areas with complete inventories and management plans. G.2. Stabilize, improve and restore Renton’s natural areas. G.3. Facilitate healthy stream and river corridors to protect water quality, provide wildlife habitat and connect people to nature. G.4. Protect and preserve natural resources and systems when developing or redeveloping parks and facilities. G.5. Monitor and manage natural areas to minimize invasive species and improve riparian, upland and forest habitat health. G.6. Manage encroachments on public property to minimize degradation to the ecosystem. G.7. Utilize Renton’s diverse natural areas to provide environmental education and facilitate stewardship in the community. G.8. Enhance and restore native forests to maximize ecosystem services such as stormwater management, air quality, aquifer recharge, carbon sequestration, wildlife habitat and other ecosystem services. GOAL G: Protecting and conserving natural resources Protect, conserve and enhance Renton’s diverse natural resources for the long-term health of ecosystems, and for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS RESOLUTION NO. 4398 12 | CITY OF RENTON Renton, Washington is at the center of the Puget Sound region. Located at the south end of Lake Washington, the city contains 23.6 square miles within its city limits. The city is bordered by unincorporated King County, and the cities of Kent, Tukwila and Newcastle. Renton is situated at a key point in the regional motorized and non-motorized transportation network. EXISTING CONDITIONS RENTON TODAY Historically, Renton was a small town located between the lake and the forest. In many ways it still retains that character. At the physical and economic core of the City, Renton’s historic downtown offers shopping and year-round community events and activities. Uphill from Downtown Renton, the landscape is characterized by residential development and natural areas. The City is crossed by rivers and creeks, and its landscape is defined by riparian woodlands. The Cedar River, which winds through the heart of Renton’s historic downtown, at one time contained the largest run of sockeye salmon in the continental United States. The City’s river, creeks and Lake Washington are home to runs of chinook, sockeye and coho salmon. Several factors place Renton on the threshold of change: the continuing transition of Renton’s industrial sector and economy; continuing regional and local population growth; and the City’s location at the crossroads of local and regional transportation networks. These factors foreshadow a new role for Renton as an important metropolitan center in the region and a designated Regional Growth Center. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 13 Strong Economy Renton’s industrial sector is undergoing a transition away from heavy industrial/manufacturing with professional and health care services now driving growth. The number of manufacturing jobs has stayed stable, with Boeing and its suppliers maintaining substantial operations in Renton. The fastest growth between 2011 and 2017 was in the health care services sector, with over 2,000 jobs added, reflecting Kaiser Permanente’s investment in the area. Accommodation and food services have also grown substantially. Major regional retailers, such as Ikea, draw shoppers to Renton and support additional jobs. Growing and Diversifying Population Growth patterns and demographic characteristics of Renton’s residents strongly influence recreation interests and levels of participation, affecting the current and future need for parks, recreation and natural areas. As of 2019, Renton has a population of 104,700; making it the eighth most populous city in Washington State and the fourth most populous in King County. From 2010 to 2019, the City gained 13,773 residents; an overall increase of 15.2%. During this period Renton matched King County’s overall growth at 15.3%. The annual growth rate has averaged 1.58% for this most recent 10 years. Growth projections, completed for the City’s Comprehensive Plan, estimate an additional 16,700 housing units by 2035. Based on the average annual growth rate (1.58%), the population in 2035 will be 134,548. In particular, Renton’s downtown is expected to experience considerable growth and change because a significant portion of the area has been designated a Regional Growth Center by the Puget Sound Regional Council. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 14 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO Renton has become increasingly more diverse since 2010, as Table 2.1 indicates. Populations identifying as Hispanic Origin, multiple races and other races increased between 2010 and 2017. While the mix of backgrounds continues to change in Renton, the general trend of increased diversity is expected to continue. Transportation Hub Renton was originally located on Lake Washington for access to water transportation. Today, the City’s location as a hub of regional transportation is driving growth and change. Renton is four miles from the Seattle Tacoma International Airport (SeaTac) and has easy access to I-5, a key West Coast freight route. Additionally, I-405 and State Routes 167, 169, 515 and 900 all intersect in Renton. For many of the aforementioned reasons, Renton is also a major hub of the growing network of on and off-street bicycle and pedestrian routes. The importance of local and regional non-motorized transportation has grown for both recreation and transportation purposes. In addition to positioning Renton for economic growth, the many routes create both transportation and access opportunities. However, Renton’s major transportation routes often create barriers to non- motorized transportation. RACE AND ETHNICITY 2010POPULATION 2017POPULATION PERCENT CHANGE 2000-2017 White 49.4%53.5%4.1% Asian 21.1%18.9%-2.2% African American 10.4%8.4%-2.0% Hispanic Origin (Any Race)13.1%17.5%4.4% Other Race 0.2%10.6%10.4% Two or More Races 4.7%7.3%2.6% American Indian 0.5%0.3%-0.2% Pacific Islander 0.7%0.9%0.2% Table 2.1: Race and Ethnicity 2010-2017 City of Renton US Census Bureau 2010 Census and 2017 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 15 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROVIDING PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS The City of Renton acquires, builds, maintains and manages an extensive inventory of parks and natural areas. Organizationally, the City is divided into eight departments, each of which reports to the Chief Administrative Officer who in turn reports to the Mayor, City Council and ultimately the citizens of Renton. The Community Services Department is the primary manager of the park and natural area system and is responsible for parks, trails, urban forestry, building structures, recreational programs, events, and volunteer activities. In planning for Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas, the Community Services department chiefly collaborates with two departments. The Community and Economic Development (CED) department is responsible for economic development, business partnered events, development services, and planning (including development of and updates to the Comprehensive Plan). CED is the lead on sheparding the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan through the SEPA environmental review process. A second department, Public Works, has its own long-term planning processes including the six-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) that supports trails and non-motorized transportation resulting in collaboration with planning for the parks and trails system. The Community Services Department is composed of eight divisions, providing the following services as defined in the City’s budget document: • Administration: Provides management and direction for the entire department. • Recreation and Neighborhoods: Promotes and supports a more livable community by providing opportunities for the public to participate in diverse recreational, cultural, athletic and aquatic programs and activities. In addition, the Recreation & Neighborhoods Division provides leadership, guidance, and resources which connect and engage residents, neighborhoods, businesses and the City through diverse opportunities for partnerships, volunteers, special events, sister cities, farmers markets and neighborhood programs. A survey of STREAM Team youth participants indicated: 63% learned they can celebrate how people have different languages, cultures and abilities. 70% saw new places when they went on field trips Source: STREAM Team Outcomes Report, Renton Recreation and Neighborhoods Division, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 16 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO • Parks Planning & Natural Resources: Provides a comprehensive and interrelated system of parks, recreation, open spaces and trails that respond to locally‐based needs, values and conditions, provides an appealing and harmonious environment, and protects the integrity and quality of the surrounding natural systems; creates a sustainable and exemplary urban forest. • Parks & Trails: Provides a safe, clean, attractive, accessible and well-maintained environment for the public’s enjoyment of active and passive recreational opportunities along with natural resource and wildlife preservation and stewardship. • Facilities: Develops and maintains City buildings and manages the delivery of building‐related services to the public and the City workforce in a safe, customer‐focused manner. • Human Services: In partnership with the community, helps provide services, resources, and opportunities so that residents have food, clothing and shelter, are healthy and safe and develop to their fullest capacity. • Golf Course: Independently operates a public 18-hole, par 72 course with a driving range, pro shop and restaurant. The golf course is a Certified Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary. • Museum: The City’s only organization dedicated to the preservation, documentation and education about the City’s heritage. With the support of the Renton Historical Society, the Museum cares for a collection of over 90,000 objects and 14,000 historic photos. The Museum also provides changing and permanent exhibits, programs, publications, and classroom outreach about local history. PARK LAND AND RECREATION FACILITIES Renton’s parks, recreation and natural area system is comprised of distinctive parks and popular recreation facilities, providing for a wide range of opportunities and benefits for the community. Parks are also a key gathering point, creating space for building community and providing exposure to history, arts and culture. In addition, RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 17 EXISTING CONDITIONS many parks in Renton play a critical role in preserving natural areas, protecting wildlife and riparian habitat, conserving natural resources and contributing to clean water and a healthy environment for city residents. Park Classification The City’s park system is composed of various types of parks; each providing unique recreation and environmental opportunities. City parks are classified by their size, function and features. While individual park sites function differently, they collectively meet a variety of community and natural resources needs. In total, the City of Renton provides over 1,200 acres of parks, natural areas and corridors (Table 2.2). The Existing Parks and Natural Areas Map (Page 21) illustrates the location of these parks within Renton and the classification to which each park belongs. Table 2.2: Park Land by Classification, City of Renton * Some developed park sites include natural areas and/or undeveloped areas **Reflects the undeveloped flat area of the N.A.R.CO Property NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS Neighborhood parks are small park areas (usually 2-10 acres in size) utilized for passive use and unstructured play. They often contain open lawn areas and non-programmed field space, a children’s playground, sports courts and a picnic area. Neighborhood parks provide close-to-home recreation opportunities for nearby residents, who typically live within walking and bicycling distance of the park. Some larger neighborhood parks incorporate natural areas, such as heavily wooded areas, which reduces the amount of active use acreage at the site. PARK CLASSIFICATION DEVELOPED PARK SITES*UNDEVELOPED SITES/NATURAL AREAS TOTAL # of Sites Acreage # of Sites Acreage TotalAcreage % of System Neighborhood Park 18 94.8 6 61.5 156.3 12.6% Community Park 5 100.5 1**24.0 124.5 10.0% Regional Park 1 51.3 ‐0 51.3 4.1% Special Use Area 8 198.5 ‐0 198.5 16.0% Natural Area ‐0 10 711.7 711.7 57.2% Corridor 1 1.8 ‐0 1.8 0.1% Total 33 446.9 16 805.2 1244.1 100.0% RESOLUTION NO. 4398 18 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO PARKS, RECRE AT ION AND NA TURAL ARE AS PLAN | 61 COMMUNITY NEEDS POOL VISITS CITY SPONSOREDEVENTS PLAYGROUNDS BASKETBALLCOURTS 12 55,599 63 SPORTS FIELDS 18 TENNISCOURTS 17 MAINTAINEDTRAIL MILES 13 SHELTERS 25 TREES in parks and natural areas 126,400 BENCHES 302 20 1,244 ACRES 10 Natural Areas (712 acres) 8 Special Use Parks (192 acres) 24 Neighborhood Parks (156 acres) 1 Regional Park (51 acres) 1 Corridor (2 acres) MOWED ACRES 277 FIELD BOOKINGS 1,174 6 C o m m u n i t y Par k s ( 1 2 5 a c r e s ) COMPONENTS OF RENTON’S PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS SYSTEM RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 19 EXISTING CONDITIONS The City’s current inventory of neighborhood parks ranges in size from 0.5 acres (Glencoe Park) to 23.8 acres (the undeveloped Cleveland Richardson Property). At one end of the spectrum, seven of the smallest sites are below the City’s minimum size threshold of two acres. These sites are provisionally classified as neighborhood parks but only have space to provide basic recreation opportunities, such as a playground, open lawn and an internal pathway (e.g., Glencoe Park). At the other end of the spectrum, some sites provide these facilities plus multiple sport courts, multi-use sports fields, picnic shelters, permanent restrooms and even an indoor neighborhood center (e.g., Kennydale Lions Park and Tiffany Park). Six neighborhood parks are larger than 10 acres in size. COMMUNITY PARKS Community parks are larger sites that can accommodate organized play and contain a wider range of facilities than neighborhood parks. They usually have programmable sports fields and hard surface courts, and sometimes include other major use facilities as the central focus of the park. In many cases, they will also serve the neighborhood park function for nearby residents. Community parks generally average 10-25 acres in size with a substantial portion of them devoted to active use. Renton’s community parks range in size from 10.6 acres (Liberty Park) to 43.4 acres (Ron Regis Park). Some, such as Cedar River Park, are highly developed with specialized facilities, such as the Renton Community Center, Carco Theatre and the Henry Moses Aquatic Center. Others, such as Ron Regis Park, balance natural features with sports fields and less intense park uses. REGIONAL PARKS Regional parks are large park areas (50 acres or more) that may serve a single purpose or offer a wide range of facilities and activities. In many cases, they also contain large portions of undeveloped natural areas. Many regional parks are acquired because of unique features found or developed on the site. In Renton, Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park functions as the only park in Renton that meets the size and unique character of a regional park. Coulon Park, 51.3 acres in size, is a specialized waterfront park with a variety of recreation opportunities, including restaurants, boating facilities and a guarded beach for swimming. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 20 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO SPECIAL USE AREAS Specialized parks and facilities include areas that provide a specialized use or recreational activities. With the exception of the Maplewood Golf Course (192.3 acres) and the Senior Activity Center Property (2.8 acres), special use parks in Renton are approximately one acre in size or less. These include the Piazza, Veterans Memorial, Tonkin Park (with its bandstand), Sit-In Park and the Community Garden/Greenhouse. NATURAL AREAS Natural areas in Renton preserve land for a variety of reasons. Some natural areas preserve habitat or include environmentally sensitive lands, including streams, ravines, steep hillsides and wetlands. In other cases, these may be wooded areas that contribute to the tree canopy and scenic views across Renton. In Renton, natural areas range in size from 0.3 to 264.2 acres. The vast majority of these sites are focused on water resources (rivers, streams and wetlands) and the forested lands surrounding them. Currently, four sites include trails or trail access, with the goal of providing trail access to all sites as environmental constraints allow. CORRIDORS This category of park captures narrow swaths of land that serve as connections between parks or to other destinations. A corridor site can be the location of a trail or can provide a habitat linkage between two larger areas. These sites do not typically include many park amenities. The City owns or controls several narrow pieces of property that extend between park sites, creating connections within or beyond the City’s system to other destinations in the region. All corridor lands that are owned outright by the City are associated with the Cedar River Trail and are located between Cedar River Trail Park, Jones Park and Liberty Park. The City owns a total of 1.8 acres of Cedar River Trail Corridor land. In addition to this corridor, the City owns easements to corridors in several areas including the Springbrook Trail between the Black River Riparian Forest and the Renton Wetlands. Some of these areas are developed and maintained by the City and some are managed by other entities. INCLUSIVE PLAY Meadow Crest Accessible Playground is Renton’s first community-wide fully inclusive playground. The playground was developed through the first-of-its-kind partnership between the City of Renton and Renton School District. The 1-acre park includes a variety of play experiences that build skills, strengthen self-esteem through graduated challenges and support the development of motor skills, sensory processing, and cause- and-effect learning. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 116th Ave NESE 208th StE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle G o l f C l u b R d SW 27th St SE 168th St SE Petrovitsky Rd S 133rd St 124th Ave SENE 4th St East Valley RdR e n t o n A v e S 156th Ave SE164th Ave SESW Grady Way SE 192nd St W M e r c e r W a y Puget Dr SEBenson D r S SW 7th St Lake Wa sh ing ton B lvd NW Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NESE Petr o v i t s k y R d LakeWashington Lake Youngs Cedar R i v e r Panther Lake Lake Boren May Creek Springbrook Creek Cedar R ive r Honey DewSchool RentonHigh School LindberghHigh School Fred NelsenMiddle School Cascade ElementarySchool Sierra HeightsElementary School Benson HillElementary School John McknightJr High School Renton TechnicalCollege Renton ParkElementary Talbot HillElementarySchool Tiany ParkElementary School HighlandsElem School Maple HeightsElementary School Early ChildhoodLearning Center SartoriElementary School HazenHigh School KennydaleElementary School New HorizonSchool St. Anthony'sSchoolBlack RiverRiparian Forest SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands RentonWetlands Panther CreekWetlands May CreekGreenway Honey CreekGreenway Cedar RiverNatural Area Ron RegisPark MaplewoodGolf Course Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park EdlundProperty CascadePark Cleveland /Richardson Property KiwanisPark Cedar RiverTrail Park HeritagePark PhilipArnold Park TianyPark SpringbrookTrail ThomasTeasdale Park Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center KennydaleLions Park WindsorHills Park EarlingtonPark North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center SpringbrookTrail KennydaleBeach Park May Creek Park N.A.R.COProperty KenyonDobson Property CedarRiver Park LibertyPark RiverviewPark Tiany Park / CascadePark Connection MaplewoodPark Talbot HillReservoir Park JonesPark Senior ActivityCenter Property Sit InPark GlencoePark ParkwoodSouth Park SE 186th PlaceProperties BurnettLinear Park Lake StreetOpen Space TonkinPark MaplewoodRoadside Park Piazza & Gateway Veterans Memorial Park Sunset NeighborhoodPark RentonMunicipalAirport §¨¦405 §¨¦405 FAIRWOOD KING COUNTY TUKWILA KENT NEWCASTLE MERCER ISLAND Meadow CrestAccessible Playground Other Park and Recreation Facilities Parks Provided by Others Schools Sources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019. September, 2019. Renton Park and Recreation Facilities Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Open Space Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park Base Map Features Renton City Boundary Potential Annexation Areas 0 0.5 10.25 Mile Existing Renton Parks, ° Recreation, and Natural Areas RESOLUTION NO. 4398 22 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 23 EXISTING CONDITIONS Recreational Facilities Renton’s parks offer a wide range of indoor and outdoor recreation facilities, adding recreational variety to the park system. A complete inventory of these facilities is provided in Appendix A. PLAYGROUNDS There are 20 parks in Renton that provide playground play equipment. Almost all neighborhood parks feature playgrounds; three are available in community parks and a large playground exists in Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, a regional park. The newest addition, Meadow Crest Accessible Playground, is a universally accessible facility meaning it is specially designed to support play by children of all abilities. Renton School District elementary schools each have a playground that is generally available outside of school hours. This adds an additional 13 sites for a total of 33 playgrounds in Renton. INDOOR PROGRAMMABLE SPACES The City of Renton has invested in several indoor recreation facilities, which provide local, community and regional-scale recreation opportunities. Many of the same park sites that offer rentable space also provide indoor recreation programming space. The Renton School District also provides indoor facilities that support recreation as well as education. SWIMMING POOLS/AQUATIC FACILITIES Swimming and water access are some of the most popular seasonal activities in Renton. Two sites - Kennydale Beach Park and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park ‐ provide seasonal lifeguarded public access to outdoor beach swimming and water play in Lake Washington. Cedar River Park houses Renton’s aquatic facility, the Henry Moses Aquatic Center, featuring an extensive leisure pool and a separate lap pool. Additional indoor pools are owned and operated at two area high schools and are programmed by the school district. SKATE PARK Renton’s community-scale skate park is centrally located in Liberty Park. The 8,400 square foot facility features artwork funded by the Renton Municipal Arts Commission 1% for the Arts and includes obstacles for varying degrees of ability. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 24 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO WATER ACCESS FACILITIES Several parks provide water access for boating, rowing, sailing, canoeing and kayaking. For motorized boating, the only facility in Renton is the eight‐lane boat launch at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park providing access to Lake Washington. The facility provides 123 stalls to support boat trailer parking and is over capacity on warm summer days. Non-motorized boat access is available at Coulon Park, Cedar River Trail Park and Riverview Park. DOG PARKS The North American Refractory Company (N.A.R.CO) Property has been serving as the site of a temporary off-leash dog park, originally developed by a local advocacy group (Renton’s Unleashed Furry Friends, or RUFF) in partnership with the City and is now maintained by the City. This facility is the only formal dog park in Renton and is heavily used. In addition, Renton and other South King County Cities developed and help to maintain Grandview Park through a multi- agency agreement to provide an additional off-leash area. This facility is located in the City of SeaTac. GOLF COURSE The City operates the Maplewood Golf Course, an 18-hole par 72 facility. The amenities include a 30-stall covered heated driving range, a fleet of 50 gas powered golf carts and a 15,500 sq. ft. clubhouse that has a full-service pro shop, restaurant, lounge, patio and banquet facilities. The course was certified as an Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary Golf Course in 2009, the twelfth golf course in the state to achieve this recognition. OUTDOOR COURTS The City of Renton provides 17 tennis courts, 11 full basketball courts and three half courts located throughout the City. There are also two sand volleyball courts located at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. The Renton School District also provides tennis and basketball courts. Three pickleball courts are available at Talbot Hill Reservoir Park, and a bocce ball court is available at the Senior Activity Center. COMMUNITY GARDENS Renton has developed community garden sites at North Highlands Park and near the Senior Activity Center. Garden plots (10-foot x 20-foot) can be reserved for a nominal fee through the online parks reservation system. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 25 EXISTING CONDITIONS TRAILS Renton has several miles of trails, including the popular Cedar River Trail, Honey Creek Trail, May Creek Trail and Springbrook Trail. Multiple future regional trail connections are planned in or near Renton, including the Lake to Sound Trail (connects to the Interurban Trail), the Interurban Trail, the Green River Trail, the Soos Creek Trail, Eastrail and Lake Washington Loop. As a partner in the regional trail system, Renton collaborates in trail planning and development with King County, and the neighboring cities of Kent, Newcastle and Tukwila. This partnership includes trails that cross Renton city limits such as the May Creek Trail which will eventually connect to Newcastle’s trail system and King County’s Cougar Mountain Regional Wildland Park. Eight Renton parks and the Maplewood Golf Course also have trails or trail access points to the adjacent Cedar River Regional Trail. Outside of City-owned park land, trails are also provided on easements owned by the City or other public entities. INTERPRETIVE FACILITIES Interpretive facilities such as kiosks and signs that convey the historic, cultural and environmental context of a site can be found at varying locations throughout the park system. One example is Washington State’s first TRACK Trail at Cedar River Trail Park. SPORTS FIELDS Renton has 16 sports fields, located at 11 park sites (see Appendix A-1). The Renton School District also provides 40 fields accessible to the public (see Appendix A-2). The school sites add considerably to the City’s inventory and sports groups rely on these fields for practice and games. The school district also operates a stadium used primarily for school events; but has also been scheduled by the City for Special Olympics. Most of the City’s fields are designed as multi-purpose; typically a rectangular field with one or more backstops and infields at the field corners. These fields offer the possibility of sharing the same space between different user groups, used for baseball or softball in one season and soccer or rugby in another. However, in nearly all cases only one sport can play at a time. Specialized diamond shaped (baseball/softball) and rectangular (soccer, football, rugby, etc.) fields also exist, mainly at school sites and community parks. There is an agreement for a temporary cricket field at Ron Regis Park. Complexes are increasingly a key part of competitive play. A Complex, defined as a cluster of competitive fields that can support RESOLUTION NO. 4398 26 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO multiple games or a tournament, is not a facility Renton currently offers. Field Components and Condition An important factor in the programmability of fields is the presence of key components (such as dugouts, equipment storage and lighting) and the condition of the fields. Appendix A-3 provides a detailed inventory of Renton’s sports fields and their components. In addition, a condition rating is applied to the field surface and field components. The following indicate the criteria used to evaluate field and component condition: • Fields: ‐1 = poor drainage, uneven surface, frequent wear spots, no base, rough graded ‐2 = adequate drainage, moderate base, reasonably level playing surface, few wear spots ‐3 = irrigated, good quality base and surface, well graded and level, minimal wear spots • Components: ‐1 = components due for replacement, limited functionality ‐2 = components adequate; average quality, may be dated but are still functional ‐3 = good quality or new components Three field user categories describe the character of Renton’s existing sports fields. These definitions help to plan for their maintenance and FIELD USER FIELD TYPE TOTALS TOTAL FIELDSDIAMONDRECTANGULARMULTI- PURPOSE COMPLEX City of Renton Adult 4 1 8 0 13 Youth 4 1 9 0 14 Adaptive 0 0 0 0 0 Total 4 1 11 0 16 Table 2.3: City of Renton Sports Fields by User *Note: some fields serve both youth and adults RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 27 EXISTING CONDITIONS development based on the anticipated use. Table 2.3 summarizes existing sports fields by field user, showing the total number of individual fields owned by the City of Renton. The users include: • Youth: Smaller fields that are regularly used for both youth play and, increasingly, for older adults. All fields that are not full size but used for league game play or practice fall in this scale. • Adult: Larger fields that are adequately sized for adult play and are full sized for their intended sport fall into this category. • Adaptive: Fields intended for use by players with adaptive needs, which may include all-abilities play surfaces, fall into this category. RECREATION PROGRAMMING AND SERVICES Recreation programming is a major and dynamic service provided by the City. The Recreation and Neighborhoods Division of the Community Services Department develops classes, events and activities and collaborates with a variety of community partners to expand these efforts. The combined efforts of the City and partners are advertised to the community in the recreation program guide, the city website, and a variety of digital marketing platforms. In order to provide the best service to the entire community, Recreation and Neighborhoods works closely with the City’s advisory groups, including the Renton Youth Council, the Parks Commission, the Senior Advisory Board and the City’s Inclusion Task Force, to track and adapt to the changing needs and desires. Renton’s recreation programs and services can be organized into the following major program areas: • Adaptive Recreation – recreation programs for individuals with developmental and physical challenges to provide social engagement, life enrichment and athletic program opportunities supported by City staff (examples: Special Olympics programming, Club Thursdays, field trips, healthy relationship classes around finances and social media, arts and culture classes). RESOLUTION NO. 4398 28 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO VOLUNTEERS 976 VOLUNTEEREDHOURS 3003 Park-specifi c projects: 63 CITYSPONSOREDEVENTS 1,244 ACRES 10 Natural Areas (712 acres) 8 Special Use Parks (192 acres) 24 Neighborhood Parks (156 acres) 6 C o m m u n i t y Par k s ( 1 2 5 a c r e s ) 1 Regional Park (51 acres) 1 Corridor (2 acres) MOWED ACRES 277 GAME PREPS 435INDIVIDUALSREGISTERED FOR 6,348 CLASSES, CAMPS AND OTHER PROGRAMS 14,720 LIFEGUARDS 103 SUMMER CAMP USERS 2,407 YOUTH SERVED 4,902 FARMERS MARKET VENDORS SERVING 66 ATTENDEES 51,000 OPERATING RENTON’S PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS SYSTEM RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 29 EXISTING CONDITIONS • Aquatics – City Beaches and Henry Moses Aquatic Center: operations and maintenance of pools and equipment, life guarding, guest services, recreation programming, events, and private rentals all supported by City staff (examples: memberships, ticket sales, lifeguard training, free life jacket program, summer camps, swim lessons, water walking, lap swim, open swim, movie nights, Pooch Plunge). • Park and Trail Use: use of any outdoor park space or park amenity for recreational purposes that does not require coordination or supervision by city staff (examples: walking, jogging, hiking, biking, outdoor basketball and tennis courts, use of outdoor exercise equipment, and playgrounds). • Events – Sponsored, Partnered or Permitted: open to the general public for the purpose of building community; providing entertainment and experiences for residents; may require registration depending on the structure or type of event. • Neighborhood Program: provides matching dollars for neighborhood improvements, organizing, or for projects developed and implemented by community members. The program requires awardees to match their award with contributions from their neighborhood in the form of volunteer time, cash, or donations (examples: Winsper HOA “Trail Revitalization Refurbishment Project,” South Renton Connection “Farmers Market Mural Art Project,” Greenleaf HOA “Little Free Library,” LaCrosse HOA “Community Movie Night,” North Renton Neighborhood Association “Emergency Preparedness Training & Kit Building,” The Pointe HOA “Playground Improvement Project,” Hoquiam Avenue Neighborhood Alliance “Community Cleanup & Clothing/ Food Drive Event”). • Community Volunteer Program: projects-based volunteer opportunities managed or overseen by staff initiated by the City, or outside organizations, schools, or individuals (examples: Trail Rangers, Green and Clean, Arbor Day Earth Day, Eagle Scout projects). • Rentals/Leases: rental of City owned buildings or spaces such as rooms, gyms, athletic fields, park space, picnic shelters VOLUNTEERS 976 VOLUNTEEREDHOURS 3003 Park-specifi c projects: 63 CITYSPONSOREDEVENTS 1,244 ACRES 10 Natural Areas (712 acres) 8 Special Use Parks (192 acres) 24 Neighborhood Parks (156 acres) 6 C o m m u n i t y Par k s ( 1 2 5 a c r e s ) 1 Regional Park (51 acres) 1 Corridor (2 acres) MOWED ACRES 277 GAME PREPS 435INDIVIDUALSREGISTERED FOR 6,348 CLASSES, CAMPS AND OTHER PROGRAMS 14,720 LIFEGUARDS 103 SUMMER CAMP USERS 2,407 YOUTH SERVED 4,902 FARMERS MARKET VENDORS SERVING 66 ATTENDEES 51,000 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 30 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO and other amenities for exclusive use, one time or extended use (categories include: Henry Moses Aquatic Center, Picnic Shelters, Field Rentals, Indoor Facility Rentals). • Programs: enrichment and health and wellness programs and activities to expose residents to a variety of art, drama, dance, civic engagement for all ages. • Recreational Youth and Adults Sports & Leagues: recreational and/or instructional sports programs and activities. Participation open to all that register, no try outs required (examples: baseball, basketball, softball, volleyball, group swim lessons, youth tennis classes, gymnastics, Tae Kwon Do, youth volleyball, cheerleading). • Partnering Organizations: services provided by contracted companies at centers such as the Renton Community Center and Renton Senior Activity Center that improve the community and individual well-being (examples: low cost senior lunch program, low cost senior dental and foot care, free tax preparation, free legal services, transportations services, informational speakers). • Environmental Programming: programs that expose the community to the natural resources and habitat within Renton. Provide educational opportunities and experiences that cover the history of these resources and promote conservation of them such as our Cedar River and the salmon that live within it, natural open green spaces, community parks, and local wildlife. NATURAL AREAS Natural resources can be found within existing parks of any type: at neighborhood and community parks, special use areas and natural areas. The City’s natural area lands, in particular, contain important local and regional natural resources—including creek and river floodplains, wetlands, riparian woodlands and upland forests. For the purpose of this Plan, the term natural area is used as a category of park land (generally kept in a less developed state) and natural resource refers to the features of any land such as vegetation, wildlife and salmon habitat, water resources and tree canopy. Many parks and natural area lands protect these sensitive resources. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 31 EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Portfolio Renton’s parks play various roles in natural resource conservation. While some developed parks are not thought of for their natural resources, some heavily developed parks serve to protect aquifer recharge, including Maplewood Golf Course. Other areas are primarily undeveloped and have limited trail access (Black River Riparian Forest and Cedar River Natural Area). Within this range are several sites that include both developed and natural features. Additional properties owned by the City (some managed by other departments) also serve natural resource functions, whether they are heavily forested or contain wetlands to help manage surface and storm water such as the Cedar River Natural Area or the Renton Wetlands Mitigation Bank. King County is also a major natural area property owner in and around Renton; the City continues to coordinate property acquisitions with neighboring jurisdictions to create connected systems. Most of the natural areas and the associated natural resources in Renton are concentrated along river or stream valleys, including the Cedar River, May Creek, Honey Creek, Soos Creek, Springbrook Creek and Panther Creek. The Cedar River is the most prominent of these waterways in Renton, providing some of the best salmon habitat in King County and recharging the aquifers that are the primary source of Renton drinking water. The Green River corridor is west of Renton’s border, and is hydrologically connected to remnants of the Black River. These two river systems are managed as Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA) 8 (Lake Washington/Cedar/ Sammamish) and WRIA 9 (Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound). Soos Creek flows along the southeastern edge of the city. With the exception of Springbrook Creek and the Green River, all of these creeks and rivers drain into Lake Washington and eventually Puget Sound. Many of these streams have been modified by manmade structures. Most of Renton’s greenways are well connected but there are opportunities to fill gaps where land is privately held. Soos Creek, Cedar River, Honey Creek, May Creek and the Springbrook Watershed are important aquifer recharge areas. Of all the City’s Community Planning Areas, West Hill, Talbot, Kennydale and City Center have the highest percentage of land identified as possible planting areas. - Renton Urban Tree Canopy Assessment 2018 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 32 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO RENTON’S NATURAL AREAS Renton’s natural areas provide many community benefi ts. With restoration eff ort, the potential of these unique areas could be maximized. Restoration builds on the successes and addresses the challenges. Carbon Storage Improved Wildlife Habitat Invasive Species Removal Healthy Waterways Recreation Enhancements Water Quality RESTORATION PROVIDES BENEFITS IN A MYRIAD OF WAYS CHALLENGESSUCCESSES Soil Erosion Control Water Filtration Air Purifi cation Community Health Creative Inspiration SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES OF RENTON’S NATURAL AREAS RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 33 EXISTING CONDITIONS WETLANDS, RIPARIAN CORRIDORS AND FLOODPLAINS A sizeable portion of the natural acreage in Renton is classified as wetlands, riparian corridors or floodplains. Local streams are low to moderate gradient, with low lying floodplains that include wetlands. Some of these wetlands are open and grassy, while other areas have woodlands dominated by maple, cottonwood and alder (with ash trees present, particularly at the Black River Riparian Forest area). Renton has fairly extensive floodplains, some of which have been developed. Floodplains are concentrated along the Cedar River, May Creek, Soos Creek and the Green River. The Black River area has experienced extensive flooding and is managed by the King County Flood Control District. Riparian corridors within Renton are somewhat discontinuous. Undeveloped stretches cut through the city and provide green space near many homes and neighborhoods. The May Creek, Soos Creek and Green River form greenbelts that roughly follow the northeast, southeast and southwest city boundaries, respectively. The Cedar River bisects the city, especially through the downtown area. A network of freshwater marshes and forested wetlands exists in the western part of Renton, including the Black River Riparian Forest area. There are over 500 acres of riparian woodland (North Pacific Lowland Riparian Forest and Shrubland) within Renton, and over 120 acres of Temperate Pacific Freshwater Emergent Marsh. Within Renton’s park system, there are approximately 170 acres of riparian woodland and 30 acres of Temperate Pacific Emergent Marsh.1 UPLAND FORESTS In addition to the forested areas of wetland and riparian corridors, nearly 3,000 acres of additional public and private land in Renton are classified as upland forest2. The upland forest lands across the city are concentrated along steep bluffs and river corridors. Within Renton park lands, approximately 775 acres are forested, roughly 65% of all park land. The dominant trees noted in the City’s Tree Inventory are big leaf maple, cottonwood, red alder and Douglas fir. 1 2010 USGS Gap Analysis http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/; no updated data available since 2010. 2 USGS Gap Analysis - this includes forest on private property and may include areas outside of the city limits due to the margin of error in the analysis. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 34 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO All of Renton’s forests have been logged in the past and are in varying stages of recovery from this initial disturbance. There is no true old growth forest within the city, though there may be individual old growth trees. STREET TREES Street trees, defined as trees growing in Renton’s rights-of-way, are an important part of the urban forest, supplementing the larger forested lands. These trees provide the general benefits of larger stands of trees and contribute directly to the beautification of the city. In 2007, the City completed a public property tree inventory and assessment that individually counted all trees in rights‐of‐way and parks. In addition to the location, type and number of trees, the assessment provides information on management issues and health of the trees. The inventory and assessment identified over 10,000 street trees and 20,370 park trees. In addition to these trees, which exist in more developed environments, the inventory also estimates the number of trees within Renton’s natural area lands at over 106,069. TREE CANOPY The total of the area covered by trees in the forested land, street trees and trees on private property is the urban tree canopy. Renton completed the Urban Tree Canopy Assessment in July 2011 and again in November 2018. This assessment involves mapping the tree canopy based on satellite imagery with the express purpose of quantifying the environmental benefits of the canopy and to establish data points to measure change over time. Results in 2018 indicate total canopy coverage of 4,382 acres, or 29.3% of the area of the City in 2017. This is an increase of approximately 95 acres or ~0.6 percent from 28.7 percent canopy coverage in 2010. Natural Area Condition Like all urban “natural areas” in the greater Seattle region, Renton’s natural areas were influenced by logging or farming prior to urban development. Now, they are influenced by their developed surroundings. In most cases, natural areas are recovered or are still recovering naturally. However, these areas often include invasive species, such as ivy, blackberry, knotweed, garlic mustard, among others. These invasive species can inhibit tree growth, outcompete native plants in the understory and form monocultures. If left RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 35 EXISTING CONDITIONS Urban tree canopy covers 29% of Renton’s land. An additional 20% of the city’s land area not presently occupied by tree canopy is suitable for tree plantings. - Renton Urban Tree Canopy Assessment 2018 unchecked, they can spread and significantly degrade habitat quality for native wildlife, as well as visual appearance. The size, shape, ecological condition, and isolation of Renton’s natural areas all influence how well they can sustain themselves, and what wildlife can live in them. As a general rule, larger, more connected habitats have greater species richness, or biological diversity (biodiversity). Habitats can be continuously connected via a corridor, or in a discontinuous manner referred to as “stepping stone” habitats. Most of Renton’s natural areas are not well connected to one another although the city includes some important natural area connections such as Honey Creek and May Creek. The May and Honey Creek Greenways are nearly connected to Cougar Mountain Regional Park, which in turn connects east to the Cascades. The Cedar River Corridor is reasonably well connected from east of I-405 to the Cascade Mountains. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES The City of Renton has several unique areas of habitat, many of which coincide with its wetlands and water resources. While the Cedar River supports major fish runs, Springbrook Creek, Honey Creek and May Creek also provide habitat for salmonids. The Black River Riparian Forest provides habitat for over 50 species of birds, including herons and eagles, and many small mammals. The Cedar River, May Creek and Panther Creek corridors have forest, meadow and shrub habitats that provide shelter and food for many species. Beyond watersheds, salmon and wildlife habitat, Renton’s history is steeped in forestry. From its early naming after Captain William Renton (a lumberman), to its ten-year status as a Tree City USA, the City of Renton values its trees. Renton has managed trees for many years and in 2008 embarked upon a formal urban forestry program. In 2009, City Council approved the 2009 Urban and Community Forestry Development Plan, a legacy program that continues to guide the City’s urban forestry efforts. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 36 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER TWO This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 3 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 4398 38 | CITY OF RENTON Connecting our community to the environment and promoting healthy lifestyles is critical to Renton’s vision for parks, recreation and natural areas. Similarly, linking our community to park resources, and understanding our community’s recreation needs, are foundational to this planning process. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan is grounded in an extensive public involvement process that utilized new approaches to outreach. For this Plan, the Community Services Department piloted an inclusive outreach strategy, further integrated online input opportunities and provided materials in three languages. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT This chapter summarizes the themes that emerged from community input and provides an overview of the public involvement activities and city meetings that were part of the planning process. KEY THEMES Key themes emerged through the layering of community engagement activities, providing insights into areas of emphasis for the community. These themes helped in the interpretation of demand for parks, facilities and programs and in shaping the vision, goals and recommendations for this Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 39 JAN 2019 PROJECT LAUNCH FEB 2019 MARCH 2019 APRIL 2019 JUNE 2019 MAY 2019 JULY/AUG 2019 SEPT/OCT 2019 NOV 2019 DRAFTPLAN COUNCIL CONSIDERS PLAN ADOPTION WINTER2019 COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE #1 COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE & ONLINE OPEN HOUSE #2 COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE & ONLINE OPEN HOUSE #3 ONLINE MAP SURVEY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS ONLINE PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #2STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #1 INCLUSIVE OUTREACH INCLUSIVE OUTREACH COMMUNITY PRIORITIES SURVEY Increase Connections and Trails Trail-related recreation, trail connections and bicycle and pedestrian access to parks came up in every public involvement activity. This is consistent with findings from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan, and with regional, statewide and national trends. There were many specific comments about ways to enhance trail connectivity and use in Renton, including specific suggestions about particular connections such as Soos Creek and the Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail. In the online extension of Open House #2, walking or biking on a trail was one of the top two most frequently selected answers to the question “Which of the following features or activities are most important to have in the parks, recreation and natural areas system?”, out of ten answer choices. Protect and Conserve Natural Areas Natural areas continue to be a major area of interest across the Renton community, especially the protection and conservation of natural areas and the ability of the public to access nature. According to public feedback, natural areas are also highly valued for outdoor recreation and for the opportunities they create to instill a stewardship ethic and sense of ownership among residents. As revealed in the community priority survey, natural areas are used at least occasionally by most of Renton’s residents, with over 70% saying they walk/hike on a trail or visit a natural area at least two times a year. Over 30% report visiting more than 10 times per year. In Open House #2, participants ranked natural areas as their top priority among the four park types. Natural areas and access to nature came up in every other public engagement opportunity, highlighting the importance of nature in the park system. Specific public comments on the topic of natural areas included identifying and obtaining funding for corridor RESOLUTION NO. 4398 40 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER THREE expansion and restoration, removing invasive species, supporting salmon habitat, sustaining the tree canopy, ensuring safety within remote places and providing ongoing monitoring and maintenance. Prioritize Water Access Water access has been a consistently popular feature of parks across community input. This includes Lake Washington, the Cedar River and even interest in interactive fountains in addition to Renton’s natural bodies of water. The interactive map results highlighted the attraction of sites with water access. Responses to the question “Which Renton parks do you use?” provided additional indication that water access and the ability to interact with water is a highly valued feature in Renton parks. Maintain and Sustain the Park System Public engagement results revealed that the Renton community recognizes the importance of maintenance, and the need for funding to sustain services. At Community Open House #1, participants commented on the need for increased maintenance MAP-BASED DATA POINTS FROM COMMUNITY MEMBERS 1,473 Most heavily used parks are near water (Lake Washington and the Cedar River) Heat map of the responses to “Which Renton parks do you use?” Color shifts from blue to red where more pins have been placed. The most used parks are along the Cedar River and Lake Washington. In Open House #2 participants built a mood board by adding images, primarily focused on nature and water access. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 41 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT and the need for funding, a topic that also came up in stakeholder interviews. The interactive map exercise included questions about improvements needed at parks and barriers to using parks. Whether interactive map respondents provided park-specific feedback or just made a general comment, park maintenance with a focus on the availability of open, clean restrooms was frequently noted. The Community Priority Survey revealed that the majority (62%) of Renton residents are satisfied with the level of parks maintenance. When asked about funding priorities, 40% of survey respondents rated improving maintenance and cleanliness as extremely important with another 38% rating this as important (see figure 3.1). This was second only to improving safety in terms of priority. Maintenance issues reported by the public are sometimes associated with the impacts of homelessness on parks, which is an ongoing and resource- intensive challenge in the community. Increased programming in parks, while dependent upon staff capacity, can enhance perceptions of safety. Improving safety in parks, recreation facilities, and natural areasImproving maintenance and cleanliness of parks, recreation facilities, and natural areasAdding new parks and expanding natural areas throughout Renton neighborhoodsImproving accessibility of parks and recreation facilities for seniors and those with disabil ities Outreach and communication to residents Improving accessibility of natural areas... for seniors or those with disabilities Offering more recreational programs 44% 40% 30% 27% 24% 23% 23% 29% 38% 30% 29% 32% 27% 30% 21% 19% 24% 32% 29% 36% 34% 5% 2% 9% 7% 9% 9% 7% 1% 8% 4% 5% 5% 6% 5 - Extremely important 4 3/(NR)2 1 - Not at all important Figure 3.1: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Funding Priorities RESOLUTION NO. 4398 42 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER THREE Invest in Parks and Facilities The City’s parks and recreation facilities are important to Renton’s quality of life. The Renton community continues to be interested in adding new parks to the park system both to keep pace with growth and to fill gaps in park access. Participants in public engagement activities also indicated areas where park and recreation development could focus, such as parks in the Cedar River Corridor and trails around May Creek. Other locations within the city that were identified as needing additional parks and facilities are Benson and Talbot planning areas. Consistent with the 2011 Plan is the emphasis on reinvesting in and renovating existing parks. Across all activities, participants reported using existing parks near their homes frequently, and brought up the need for improvements to parks and accessible restrooms, water fountains and more benches and seating areas. Improving neighborhood parks was a top priority for participants in the inclusive engagement activities. Participants in multiple activities brought up the importance of accessibility for people with disabilities. Through the interactive mapping exercise, participants made 559 park-specific suggestions about how to improve Renton’s existing parks. According to public input, new recreation facilities are also desired. Specific ideas suggested through the interactive mapping exercise were pickleball courts, a climbing wall, more dog parks, artificial turf sports fields, exercise stations and new or upgraded play areas. According to the community priority survey, top facility investment priorities are a year-round farmers market, enclosing the aquatic center and building an all-weather sports field complex. Focus on Healthy, Community-Oriented Programming Renton residents recreate for health and fitness reasons, including mental health benefits associated with social engagement. Competitive sports activities, fitness activities, swimming, paddling activities and programs experience high levels of participation. Several comments were received regarding the availability of programming associated with these activities, as well as the quality, quantity and availability of facilities. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 43 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT There is interest in expanding the capacity of the Henry Moses Aquatic Center for swimming programs by covering the lap pool for year-round use. Senior programs and activities and youth programs and activities were topics of interest in multiple engagement activities. Overall, there were many comments about expanding opportunities for physical exercise for all ages and abilities. For example, participants noted that improving the quality or increasing the quantity of sports facilities are ways to make these facilities more accessible and increase activity among residents. In addition to programs and facilities that support activity and health, many public involvement comments reflected a need for recreation opportunities that build community and/or reflect the needs of the entire community, such as the popular citywide special events and neighborhood events. According to community priority survey results, a majority of residents say offering more recreational programs is important. For people who do participate in programs, the highest frequencies of use are for citywide events and for youth and adult sports leagues. 68% 57% 45% 45% 45% 43% 42% 40% 22% 28% 40% 40% 52% 40% 56% 43% 10% 16% 15% 15% 4% 17% 3% 18% +58 +41 +30 +30 +41 +27 +39 +22 Year-round Farmers Market Enclose the aquatic center so it can be used year-round Build a new all-weather multi-use fi eld complex Build a new multi-generati onal centerPaved multi-use trails for walking and biking Create playgrounds that have unique play equipment Neighborhood parks Expand the aquatic center Invest more/ Should invest Same amount/ No opinion/ (NR)Invest le ss/ Should not invest Net Invest Figure 3.2: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Facility Investment Priorities COMMUNITY MEMBERS PARTICIPATED IN 3 OPEN HOUSES (in-person and online) 623 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 44 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER THREE Infuse Arts, Culture and Community Identity Arts, culture and Renton’s community identity came up throughout the public engagement activities. Citywide and neighborhood events were noted by many participants as important opportunities to build community identity and incorporate arts and culture. Participants in the inclusive engagement activities placed a priority on opportunities to engage in arts and culture activities during Round 1 community conversations. Open House #2 results prioritized citywide events and arts and culture events as the top priorities. This correlates with the event priorities identified by Round 2 inclusive engagement participants. Build on Partnerships There is a continued interest in building on partnerships, exploring new partnerships and working collaboratively in new ways. The need to establish and coordinate partnerships with a variety of groups was noted throughout the public engagement process. There were many general comments about the need to continue or expand partnerships for programming or facility use with service groups, environmental groups, ecumenical organizations and educational institutions. Some participants noted that the City could coordinate with multiple partners on regional projects, such as salmon habitat restoration. In addition, stakeholders recognized that volunteers and active community members, with more guidance from the City, represent a considerable potential to provide enhanced programs and events. Specific partnership ideas were suggested, such as collaboration with non-profit partners, teachers and the Renton School District to make use of parks for outdoor science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) activities. An idea for centralized scheduling for fields and facilities was also suggested at the internal/external workshop. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES The planning process incorporated a variety of community engagement opportunities in different formats and offered them at different times over the course of the year. A multi-layered, multifaceted outreach approach broadens participation by allowing people to participate on their own terms and to their own interest level. While some forums engaged more participants than others, RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 45 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT each activity was included to gain perspectives from the entire range of the Renton community. This “layering” of activities ensured that a variety of interests and priorities would be represented in this Plan. This section summarizes the public involvement activities. See Appendix D for a summary of outreach methods. • Community Priority Survey: The survey was conducted between July 10th and August 15th, 2019 by EMC Research using a methodology that randomly selected a sample of addresses within Renton city limits to receive the survey. The survey closed with 325 responses from selected Renton residents, providing a statistically valid representation of Renton residents and an overall margin of error of +/- 5.4 percentage points at a 95 percent confidence level. Surveys were mailed to randomly selected addresses within Renton city limits, and respondents were able to respond by either completing a paper copy and returning it via mail, or by going to a secure website link and completing the survey online. This method was chosen to reach a broader portion of the population than other available methods. The survey was offered in English, Spanish and Vietnamese. • Community and Online Open House Events: Three Open Houses were held during the planning process, offering open 10% 7% 6% 5% 5% 5% 17% 3% 2% 6% 7% 8% 32% 5% 5% 17% 33% 24% 32% 68% 71% 56% 42% 44% 8% 14% 12% 14% 11% 18% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% Attend a city-sponsored event such as Renton River Days… Play in an adult sports league Play in a youth sports league Attend a neighborhood event like a movie night or community block party Attend an outdoor live performance - such as a concert Attend a cultural or arts event like the Food Truck Night or art fairs 10+ times a year 5-9 times a year 2-4 times a year Once or less Didn't know existed (No Response) Figure 3.3: Community Priority Survey, 2019 Results on Most Frequently Used Programs STATISTICALLY VALID COMMUNITY SURVEY PARTICIPANTS 325 Percent that use a neighborhood park 5+ times a year by region 90% 73% 57% RESOLUTION NO. 4398 46 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER THREE opportunities for all community members to provide input during the update of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. Each open house was paired with an online open house to expand participation to those members of the public who were unable to attend in person. -Community Open House #1 and Online Interactive Mapping: The first open house event focused on how the community enjoys parks, recreation, trails and natural areas. Small groups discussed big and little ideas for improvements and explored different user perspectives, sharing their ideas with the larger group. At this first open house, 55 community members signed in. The online extension for the first open house was the online interactive mapping exercise. The Interactive Map provided an input opportunity for community members who couldn’t attend Community Open House #1. The primary function of the Interactive Map was to re-create the open house exercise, which explored how participants use parks and where big and little ideas could improve the system. In total, 1,473 points were placed Table 3.1: Open House #2 Combined Results on Park Priorities OPEN HOUSE 2 % OF TOTAL OPENHOUSE RESPONSES ONLINE RESPONSE % OF TOTAL OPENHOUSE RESPONSES TOTAL PERCENT OF TOTAL Natural Areas: Examples include Black River Riparian Forest, Cedar River Natural Area and May Creek Greenway 123 36%145 39%268 37% Neighborhood Parks: Examples include Sunset Neighborhood Park, Cascade Park and Heritage Park 85 25%96 26%181 25% Special Use Parks: Examples include parks with unique features such as off-leash dog park, community garden, or farmers market 79 23%60 16%139 19% Community Parks: Examples include Liberty, Cedar River, Ron Regis and Highlands Parks 54 16%73 20%127 18% ONLINE MAP SURVEY PARTICIPANTS 634 45% youth • Youth park use is more focused on gathering with friends and family; playing sports • Adult park use is more focused on exercise; bringing kids to play RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 47 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT on the map each representing unique input from the 643 participants. -Community Open House #2 and Online Extension: The second open house was scheduled to coincide with opening day of the Renton Farmers Market on June 4, 2019 and was structured as a drop-in session held in the adjacent Renton Pavilion Event Center. Participants at this event confirmed the vision and goals of the Plan; created a mood board (collage) representing the character or identity for Renton’s system; and prioritized events and park types. Approximately 150 participated, and of those participants, 128 signed in. The open house activities were adapted to an online format that was available in English, Spanish and Vietnamese from June 4th through June 30th. The online extension of the open house attracted a total of 364 responses, including 186 respondents who reached the end of the questions. -Community Open House #3 and Online Extension: The third open house took place on October 3, 2019. The focus of this event was on potential improvements; participants reviewed and discussed four new or revised Table 3.2: Open House #2 Combined Results on Event Priorities OPEN HOUSE % OF TOTAL OPENHOUSE RESPONSES ONLINE RESPONSE % OF TOTAL ONLINE RESPONSES TOTAL PERCENT OF TOTAL Citywide Events: Examples include Renton River Days and Clam Lights 99 29%135 37%234 33% Arts & Culture: Examples include Food Truck Night and art fairs 124 37%103 29%227 32% Neighborhood Events: Examples include Neighborhood Movie Nights and Community Potluck Barbecues 78 23%70 19%148 21% Community Events: Examples include Bike Rodeo & Family Safety Fair and the Pooch Plunge 37 11%53 15%90 13% TOP TWO ANSWERS What is important to you when you recreate? Source: Online Open House #2 53% 115 votes Spending time in nature, hiking or observing wildlife 41% 89 votes Walking or biking on a trail RESOLUTION NO. 4398 48 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER THREE park concepts and participated in an interactive poll about a series of 21 images of features that could be included in Renton parks. A final exercise allowed participants to indicate which of the project prioritization criteria were most important to them. Approximately 43 people participated in-person, and an online open house (replicating all of the exercises and information) reached another 194 people. • Inclusive Engagement: Through the Inclusive Engagement effort, Renton Community Services recruited five Community Conversation leaders from the Mayor’s Inclusion Task Force to conduct outreach. Each leader received training, support, materials and a small stipend, with the charge of conducting two rounds of community conversations during the planning process. The first round of Community Conversations included 11 sessions during April 2019 that involved a total of 99 community members who are culturally, ethnically and linguistically diverse and spanned a range of ages. The first round explored how these participants use parks, recreation programs and natural areas including their big or little ideas. The second round included eight community conversations attended by a total of 98 community members. The second round focused on how participants would improve the system, including where they would invest in events and new features. Supporting materials in both rounds were available in English, Spanish and Vietnamese languages. • Steering Committee: The 12-member Steering Committee met two times during the planning process (April 2019 and September 2019) to advise and provide direction. Between COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERVIEWED 5ONLINE AND IN-PERSON PLATFORMS PROMOTED ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES (Surveys, questionnaires, advertising and interpretation provided in Renton’s 3 most frequently spoken languages: English, Español, and Việt ngữ) 16 Building on relationships with: • Renton School District • Kaiser Permanente • Renton Housing Authority • Renton Chamber of Commerce • SECO Development Hello! ¡Hola! Xin chào RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 49 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT meetings, committee members reviewed materials and attended community open houses as they were available. The committee consisted of a demographically diverse group, representing a range of interests, ages and backgrounds. Some Steering Committee members also served on the Steering Committee for the 2011 Plan, providing continuity. • Stakeholder Interviews: Five interviews were held in February, March and September 2019. Their purpose was to engage individuals or small groups (see Appendix D) with specific interests in the parks, recreation and natural areas system in Renton to discuss their perspective on changes in the community, how people engage with the system and how to improve parks, recreation and natural areas. These individual perspectives helped the planning team identify issues that were explored in the Plan update process. • Staff Workshop: Staff participated in a kickoff meeting at the beginning of the planning process. The April 2019 staff workshop convened nine leaders in the Community Services Department to discuss how the City can evolve its services to meet the changing community needs in Renton through a scenario exercise. • Internal/ External Workshop: The Internal/External Workshop took place in March 2019 and invited nine partners from nearby agencies and non-profit organizations, along with City of Renton Community Services Department staff. The workshop focused on identifying changes that are impacting parks and recreation needs in Renton and the surrounding region since the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan was last updated in 2011. The participants were INCLUSIVE CONVERSATION LEADERS 5 COMMUNITY MEMBERS THROUGH INCLUSIVE OUTREACH 197 • Budgeting exercise allocated the most $ to improving existing parks • Support gathering with friends and family and sports REACHED RESOLUTION NO. 4398 50 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER THREE also asked to consider the collaborations and partnerships that exist or that could be built to expand the opportunities for residents throughout the area. • Project Website: Throughout the process, the rentonparksplan.com project website has served as a one- stop online portal for information related to the planning process, updating and educating the community about the Plan. The website includes a library of all planning documents, a calendar of events and a link to provide feedback and comments. • Online Comments: During the planning process, comments received through the project website and by email were collected, tracked, reviewed and considered. A total of 34 comments were received and considered during the planning process. CITY MEETINGS AND COORDINATION In addition to the broader public and stakeholder engagement activities, the planning process has also drawn guidance from a broader group of City elected and appointed officials. • Commission Meetings: The Parks and Planning Commissions were involved and informed throughout the process. The Parks Commission received formal updates on the planning process at their March, May, October, and November 2019 meetings. • Committee of the Whole (COW) Briefings: The Council Committee of the Whole received briefings on the planning process in February, May, September, and November 2019. • Review and Adoption Meetings: The plan review process includes meetings with the Parks Commission, the Planning Commission and the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council. The final draft plan will be brought to the City Council in consideration for adoption in January 2020. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 4 COMMUNITY NEEDS RESOLUTION NO. 4398 52 | CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY NEEDS To identify needs across Renton’s multifaceted park system, the community needs analysis evaluated existing park land, recreation facilities and programs, natural areas and trail access. The assessment of Renton’s community needs is a detailed analysis that identifies the amount of land, number and types of facilities and variety of programs that are needed now, and in the future. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan incorporates new information and analysis to fully update the community needs analysis. This chapter describes the analysis process and summarizes key findings. WASHINGTON’S RECREATION CONSERVATION OFFICE GUIDELINES At the statewide level, Washington’s Growth Management Act (GMA) recommends that communities provide an adequate level of parks and recreation service for the public, and to address existing and future needs. Communities have flexibility in determining appropriate service levels and methods for identifying needs, as the GMA goals do not specifically define an adequate level of service or specific requirements for identifying needs. As the primary provider of state funding for parks, recreation and natural areas, the state’s Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) provides guidance for determining needs. While many communities rely solely on numerical level of service (LOS) standards for identifying a specific ratio of needed park land to population, RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 53 there is increasing emphasis on promoting quality of and access to parkland, as well as gauging public satisfaction. The RCO has developed a LOS tool that assists agencies in evaluating their level of service at a city-wide level or within a smaller area. This tool is based on three sets of criteria: quantity, quality and distribution and access. The RCO tools are designed to allow agencies to use them as provided or to modify them to suit local needs. Table 4.1 includes the suggested criteria and potential indicators that are recommended for periodic evaluation of the City’s level of service. For each indicator, the tool suggests rankings from A (highest level) to E based on a range of results. For example, if the percent of the population satisfied is over 65%, the RCO tool recommends an “A” level of service. The level of service may vary from area to area but a city-wide average LOS ranking can be used as a standard to evaluate conditions within a smaller area. Building from the RCO recommendations, this Plan establishes need based on the criteria (Table 4.1 on the next page) considering quantity, and quality, with an emphasis on distribution and access. PARK NEEDS Renton residents desire a quality park system that provides a variety of recreation experiences across the city. However, existing park land is not equally distributed, which means that not all residents have equal access to developed parks, recreation facilities, programs and natural areas. To help determine park land needs, a GIS analysis evaluated access to existing park sites, based on the routes people travel to reach these parks (see Developed Park Access Map on page 56). The analysis is based on the assumption that most residents should have access to developed parks and natural areas within one-quarter to one-half-mile (walking/biking distance) from their home or place of employment. This assumption is supported by the RESOLUTION NO. 4398 54 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR emerging national standard that all people should have a park within a 10 minute walk, endorsed by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), the Trust for Public Land and the Urban Land Institute. By examining the gaps in service, the City can see where additional park land, facilities, programs and natural area land is needed. Land needs were identified city-wide and within each Community Planning Area. The quantity of land is derived from the number of parks needed to fill the geographic gaps in service and the recommended size of parks, by category (as established by the City’s design guidelines). RCO PROPOSED INDICATOR Quantity Criteria Number of Parks and Recreation Facilities % difference between existing and desired quantity or per capita average Facilities that Support Active Recreation Opportunities % of facilities that support or encourage active (muscle-powered) recreation Facility Capacity % of demand met by existing facilities Quality Criteria Agency-Based Assessment % of facilities fully functional per agency guidelines Public Satisfaction % of population satisfied Distribution and Access Criteria Population within Service Areas % of population within 0.5 mi of a neighborhood park/trail; 5 mi of a community park/trail; and 25 mi of a regional park/trail Access % of facilities that can be accessed safely by foot, bike or public transportation Table 4.1: Recreation and Conservation Office LOS Tool Source: Washington State RCO Funding Board, Manual 2, Planning Policies and Guidelines, April 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 55 COMMUNITY NEEDS Access to Developed Parks Most cities strive for a park system that provides access to basic recreation amenities within at least one half-mile of home or work. In Renton, as in most communities, the half-mile walking distance (roughly equivalent to a 10 minute walk at average walking speed) is the greatest distance most pedestrians are willing to walk to reach a destination. As illustrated by the Developed Park Access map on page 56, some Community Planning Areas contain multiple parks in close proximity and other areas are underserved, even when considering parks provided by other jurisdictions. There are large gaps in park service in some residential areas in the Kennydale, East Plateau, Benson, Talbot and West Hill Community Planning Areas1. Access to Developed Parks by Planned Density Higher density development creates a greater demand for parks and public facilities. Parks in these areas must have a capacity to serve a large number of people. For this reason, the assessment crosschecked park access with zoning designations to indicate areas where existing or planned high density residential2 and commercial3 uses could draw a high concentration of people. As illustrated by the Developed Park Access & Residential Density Map on page 58, many high-density residential zones do not have local parks within a quarter-mile of potential park users today. In Community Planning Areas such as East Plateau and Benson that have gaps in access, developed parks are particularly important. The Edlund Property and Family First Community Center are particularly well positioned to serve a high-density corridor in the Benson area. High-density areas require more park capacity to serve the greater number of residents in the immediate area, and therefore, should have parks distributed at a closer one quarter-mile service area to provide walkable access and a quality park experience. 1 For more information about Community Planning Areas see Chapter 5 2 Residential zoning categories: R-10 and higher. 3 Commercial zoning categories: Urban Center (UC), Commercial Arterial (CA), Center Village (CV), Center Downtown (CD) and Commercial Office Residential (COR). All of these zones allow high density residential mixed use with conditions; for the purposes of this map they considered as commercial areas. The majority of residents (64%) are satisfied overall with the parks, recreation, and natural areas system in Renton. There is very little difference in opinion across age groups, gender, ethnicities, geography, and between households with children vs. those without. – Community Priority Survey 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 56 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR 116th Ave NEE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle G o l f C l u b R d SW 27th St SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd S 133rd St 124th Ave SEEdmonds Ave NE1 5 4 t h P l S E NE 4th St SE May Va l l e y R d R e n t o n A v e S SE 128th St SW Grady Way 116th Ave SEW M e r c e r W a y Puget Dr SEBenson D r SLogan Ave NE Valley HwySW 41st St S 3rd St SW 7th St Union Ave NE87th Ave SLake Wa sh ing ton B lvd N Renton Ave S W Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NEMaplewoodNeighborhood Park Fort DentCounty Park SkywayPark RentonPark CoaleldPark LakeridgePark SierraPark FAIRWOOD KING COUNTYTUKWILA KENT NEWCASTLE KING COUNTY MERCER ISLAND BELLEVUE LakeWashington Lake Youngs LakeDesire Shady Lake Green River Cedar R i v e r PantherLake LakeBoren SpringbrookCreek Cedar R iver May Creek §¨¦405 §¨¦405 §¨¦5 §¨¦5 ST851 ST716 RentonMunicipalAirport Cedar River Natural Area Ron RegisPark MaplewoodGolf Course Black RiverRiparian Forest Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park RentonWetlands EdlundProperty RentonWetlands CascadePark Cleveland /Richardson Property Panther CreekWetlands KiwanisPark Cedar RiverTrail Park HeritagePark PhilipArnold Park TianyPark SpringbrookTrail ThomasTeasdale Park Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center KennydaleLions Park WindsorHills Park Honey CreekGreenway EarlingtonPark North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center SpringbrookTrail KennydaleBeach Park May Creek Park N.A.R.COProperty Meadow CrestAccessible Playground KenyonDobson Property Cedar River Natural Area Black RiverRiparian Forest Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands RentonWetlands Panther CreekWetlands Honey CreekGreenway May CreekGreenway 1 2 3 4 5 678910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park Maplewood Roadside Park Glencoe Park Senior Activity Center and Community Garden Jones Park Liberty Park Cedar River Park Piazza & Gateway Veterans Memorial Park Sit In Park Burnett Linear Park Maplewood Park Lake Street Open Space Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Parkwood South Park SE 186th Place Properties Tiany Park / Cascade Park Connection 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 18 1 Tonkin Park ° 0 ½ 1¼ Mile Other Park and Recreation Facilities Parks Provided by Others Schools Developed Park Access 1/2 Mile Renton Owned/Maintained Pedestrian Service Area Base Map Features Renton City Boundary Potential Annexation Areas Renton Park and Recreation Facilities Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Open Space Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park Pedestrian Barrier (Highways)Sources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.September 20191/2 Mile Other Agency Owned/ Maintained Pedestrian Service Area Developed Park Access RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 57 COMMUNITY NEEDS PARK LAND SYSTEM-WIDE A park system acreage standard helps relate system-wide park land need to the RCO’s quantity criteria. Table 4.2 summarizes the standard for the total park and natural area system, as well as the subset of developed parks (neighborhood, community, regional, special use and corridors). New parks should address the major gaps in park access and provide continuity in natural areas. By applying these standards to the current population of Renton, the analysis focuses attention on the need to develop park land that the City already owns (see table 4.3, page 59). At the current population level, meeting the standard requires 530.8 acres of developed park land4. The City currently has 446.9 acres of developed parks, a gap of 83.9 acres. The current inventory of undeveloped park land intended for neighborhood and community parks is almost the exact same amount, 85.5 acres. Even if this land were developed immediately it would not fill all of the gaps in access across Renton’s Community Planning Areas. For natural areas, the City is slightly ahead of the standard currently due to extensive acquisitions when funding was available in the 1990s. In the near term, there is a need to develop currently undeveloped parkland for neighborhood and community parks and to increase access to existing natural areas. In the longer term, additional land will need to be acquired to meet the level of service standard. Park Development and Renovations To meet the LOS standard and to provide better access to parks, Renton needs to proceed with developing future park sites. Six 4 Current land need is calculated by multiplying the population by the standard and dividing the result by 1,000. People living within a 10 minute walking distance of a park have higher levels of physical activity and lower rates of obesity. National Recreation and Park Association, Walking Infographic, 2016 TYPE STANDARD Developed Parks 5.07 acres/1,000 population or 1 acre of park land per 200 people Natural Areas Minimum of 6.14 acres/1,000 population Total Park and Natural Areas System Minimum of 11.21 acres/1,000 population Table 4.2: Park Acreage Standards RESOLUTION NO. 4398 58 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR 116th Ave NEE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle G o l f C l u b R d SW 27th St SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd S 133rd St 124th Ave SE1 5 4 t h P l S E NE 4th St SE May Va l l e y R d R e n t o n A v e S 156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SESW Grady Way 116th Ave SEW M e r c e r W a y Puget Dr SEBenson D r SE Valley HwySW 41st St SW 7th St 87th Ave SRenton Ave S W Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NEFAIRWOOD KING COUNTYTUKWILA KENT NEWCASTLE KING COUNTY MERCER ISLAND BELLEVUE LakeWashington Lake Youngs LakeDesire Shady Lake Green River Cedar R i v e r PantherLake LakeBoren SpringbrookCreek May Creek §¨¦405 §¨¦405 §¨¦5 §¨¦5 ST851 ST716 RentonMunicipalAirport Cedar River Natural Area Ron RegisPark MaplewoodGolf Course Black RiverRiparian Forest Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park RentonWetlands EdlundProperty RentonWetlands CascadePark Cleveland /Richardson Property Panther CreekWetlands KiwanisPark Cedar RiverTrail Park HeritagePark PhilipArnold Park TianyPark SpringbrookTrail ThomasTeasdale Park Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center KennydaleLions Park WindsorHills Park Honey CreekGreenway EarlingtonPark North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center SpringbrookTrail KennydaleBeach Park May Creek Park N.A.R.COProperty Meadow CrestAccessible Playground KenyonDobson Property Cedar River Natural Area Black RiverRiparian Forest Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands RentonWetlands Panther CreekWetlands Honey CreekGreenway May CreekGreenway 1 2 3 4 5 678910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ° 0 ½ 1¼ Mile Other Park and Recreation Facilities Parks Provided by Others Schools Zones with Residential Uses High Density Residential Zone Base Map Features Renton City Boundary Potential Annexation Areas Water Renton Park and Recreation Facilities Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Open Space Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park Developed Park Access 1/4 Mile Pedestrian Service Area Commercial Zone with Residential Uses Pedestrian Barrier (Highways)Sources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.September 2019Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park Maplewood Roadside Park Glencoe Park Senior Activity Center and Community Garden Jones Park Liberty Park Cedar River Park Piazza & Gateway Veterans Memorial Park Sit In Park Burnett Linear Park Maplewood Park Lake Street Open Space Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Parkwood South Park SE 186th Place Properties Tiany Park / Cascade Park Connection 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 18 1 Tonkin Park Developed Park Access and Residential Density RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 59 COMMUNITY NEEDS properties totaling over 80 acres remain undeveloped in the park inventory. Developing public access and adding recreation features on these sites would improve park access for many residents who do not have it today. Public input also revealed that several popular city parks receive most of the use in Renton. This is especially true for parks with water access such as Gene Coulon Memorial Park, as well as other signature parks such as Liberty Park, Cedar River Trail Park and Cedar River Park. There is a demand to enhance and renovate facilities and increase the level of maintenance at these sites to handle current park use and ensure a quality user experience. Improvements proposed for these locations as outlined in the Project List will help meet these demands and needs. Sustaining the existing system requires periodic reinvestment as individual features and ultimately entire parks reach the end of their lifespan. Without this reinvestment, the cost of maintaining parks will increase as routine tasks are overtaken by emergency ones. In 2018, the City explored the total need for major maintenance and ultimately issued $14.5 million in bonds for the most urgent projects; Renton’s park renovation and upgrade needs will require ongoing prioritization and re-prioritization. Recent park construction has focused on improving existing parks (replacing Sunset Court Park with Sunset Neighborhood Park and replacing two outdated playgrounds by adding Meadow Crest Accessible Playground in partnership with the Renton School District). Updating and renovating aged facilities that are unused or underutilized will help meet community needs. TYPE EXISTING PARKLAND 2019 (ACRES) PARKLAND NEEDED TO MEET LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD FOR 2019 POPULATION (ACRES) PARKLAND NEEDED TO MEET LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD WITH 2035 POPULATION (ACRES) Developed Parks 446.9 530.8 682.2Future Park Sites 85.5 Natural Areas 711.7 642.9 826.1 Total 1244.1 1173.7 1488.3 Table 4.3: Park Land Needs Based on Level of Service Standard* * The standard above is based on the following assumptions: 2030 population of 124,106; 95 additional acres of neighborhood and community parks; a minimum of 75 additional acres of natural areas. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 60 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR                    116th Ave NEE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle G o l f C l u b R d SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd S 133rd St 1 5 4 t h P l S E NE 4th St SE May Va l l e y R d R e n t o n A v e S 156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SESW Grady Way 116th Ave SEW M e r c e r W a y Puget Dr SEBenson D r SLogan Ave NE Valley HwySW 41st St S 3rd St SW 7th St Union Ave NE87th Ave SLake Wa sh ing ton B lvd NW Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NEFAIRWOOD KING COUNTYTUKWILA KENT NEWCASTLE KING COUNTY MERCER ISLAND BELLEVUE LakeWashington Lake Youngs LakeDesire Shady Lake Green River Cedar R i v e r PantherLake LakeBoren May Creek SpringbrookCreek §¨¦405 §¨¦405 §¨¦5 §¨¦5 ST851 ST716 RentonMunicipalAirport Ron RegisPark MaplewoodGolf Course Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park EdlundProperty CascadePark Cleveland /Richardson Property Panther CreekWetlands KiwanisPark Cedar RiverTrail Park HeritagePark PhilipArnold Park TianyPark SpringbrookTrail ThomasTeasdale Park Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center KennydaleLions Park WindsorHills Park Honey CreekGreenway EarlingtonPark North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center SpringbrookTrail KennydaleBeach Park May Creek Park N.A.R.COProperty Meadow CrestAccessible Playground KenyonDobson Property Black RiverRiparian Forest Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands Panther CreekWetlands May CreekGreenway Honey CreekGreenway 1 2 3 4 5 678910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Honey Dew School Renton High School Lindbergh High School Fred Nelsen Middle School Cascade Elementary School Sierra Heights Elementary School Benson Hill Elementary School John Mcknight Jr High School Renton Technical College Renton Park Elementary Talbot Hill Elementary School Tiany Park Elementary School Highlands Elem School Maple Heights Elementary School Early Childhood Learning Center Sartori Elementary School Hazen High School Kennydale Elementary School New Horizon School St. Anthony's School ° 0 ½ 1¼ MileSources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.October 2019Base Map Features Renton City Boundary Potential Annexation Areas Other Park and Recreation Facilities Parks Provided by Others Schools Renton Park and Recreation Facilities Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Open Space Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park Indicates Loop Trail within Park Trailhead Access 10 Minute Walk to Trailhead Area Formal Trailhead (parking, trail sign/kiosk) Informal Trailhead (parking) Pedestrian Barrier (highways) Trail Access Point (trail sign; no parking) Trails City of Renton Trails Other Pedestrian Trails    Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park Maplewood Roadside Park Glencoe Park Senior Activity Center and Community Garden Jones Park Liberty Park Cedar River Park Piazza & Gateway Veterans Memorial Park Sit In Park Burnett Linear Park Maplewood Park Lake Street Open Space Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Parkwood South Park SE 186th Place Properties Tiany Park / Cascade Park Connection 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 18 1 Tonkin Park ** * * * * * * * Trailhead Access RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 61 COMMUNITY NEEDS RECREATION FACILITY NEEDS The planning process identified needs for a variety of park and recreation facilities. The recreation facilities assessment incorporated the use of four tools to determine recreation facility needs. This included a review of statewide recreation trends, a sports field level of service (LOS) analysis, a geographic analysis and a review of community demand for facilities including but not limited to trails, sports fields, playgrounds, community gathering spaces, indoor programmable spaces, water access facilities, skate parks, dog parks and other facilities. Access to Trails Trails are a priority for the Renton community and are among the most frequently used recreation facilities. Community members have indicated that opportunities for exercise and access to natural areas are important functions of the parks, recreation and natural areas system. Community members want to see trail extensions, improved connections and wayfinding throughout the system. There is also an interest in park amenities such as lighting, seating and drinking fountains. Trails support both exercise and access. An analysis of trail access in Renton identified areas that are within a ½-mile walk to a trailhead and areas outside of a ½-mile walk (see Trailhead Access Map on page 60). The analysis includes three types of trail access points (listed in Table 4.4 above). Opportunities for improvements and/or connections will likely differ based on the type of access available. Where access points or informal trailheads exist, add features to make them formal trail heads if practicable. ACCESS TYPE DESCRIPTION Formal Trailhead Includes parking (off-street or on-street) and a trail sign or kiosk. May include a restroom or be located in a park. Informal Trailhead Includes parking, may be on-street or off-street. May be in a park. Trail Access point Formal access point to a trail that includes trail sign but does not offer parking. Table 4.4 Types of Trail Access Points More than half (58%) of residents use multi-use paved trails regularly (at least five times a year), and more than half (56%) of all residents say they walk or hike a Renton trail at least five times a year. – Community Priority Survey 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 62 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR 116th Ave NEE Mercer WayTalbot Rd SNewcastle G o l f C l u b R d SW 27th St Park Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd S 133rd St 124th Ave SE1 5 4 t h P l S E NE 4th St SE May Va l l e y R d R e n t o n A v e S 156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SESW Grady Way W M e r c e r W a y Puget Dr SELogan Ave NE Valley HwySW 41st St SW 7th St 87th Ave SLake Wa sh ing ton B lvd N Renton Ave S W Valley HwyFAIRWOOD KING COUNTYTUKWILA KENT NEWCASTLE KING COUNTY MERCER ISLAND BELLEVUE LakeWashington Lake Youngs LakeDesire Shady Lake Green River Cedar R i v e r PantherLake LakeBoren May Creek SpringbrookCreek Cedar R iver §¨¦405 §¨¦405 §¨¦5 §¨¦5 ST851 ST716 RentonMunicipalAirport Cedar River Natural Area Ron RegisPark MaplewoodGolf Course Black RiverRiparian Forest Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park RentonWetlands EdlundProperty RentonWetlands CascadePark Cleveland /Richardson Property Panther CreekWetlands KiwanisPark Cedar RiverTrail Park HeritagePark PhilipArnold Park TianyPark SpringbrookTrail ThomasTeasdale Park Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center KennydaleLions Park WindsorHills Park Honey CreekGreenway EarlingtonPark North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center SpringbrookTrail KennydaleBeach Park May Creek Park N.A.R.COProperty Meadow CrestAccessible Playground KenyonDobson Property Cedar River Natural Area Black RiverRiparian Forest Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands RentonWetlands Panther CreekWetlands Honey CreekGreenway May CreekGreenway 1 2 3 4 5 678910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ° 0 ½ 1¼ Mile Other Park and Recreation Facilities Parks Provided by Others Schools Sportseld Access 1/2 Mile Renton Owned/Maintained Sports Field Pedestrian Service Area 1/2 Mile School Owned/Maintained Sports Field Pedestrian Service Area Pedestrian Barrier (Highways) Base Map Features Renton City Boundary Potential Annexation Areas Renton Park and Recreation Facilities Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Open Space Trail Corridor Special Use Future ParkSources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.September 2019Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park Maplewood Roadside Park Glencoe Park Senior Activity Center and Community Garden Jones Park Liberty Park Cedar River Park Piazza & Gateway Veterans Memorial Park Sit In Park Burnett Linear Park Maplewood Park Lake Street Open Space Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Parkwood South Park SE 186th Place Properties Tiany Park / Cascade Park Connection 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 18 1 Tonkin Park Sports Field Access RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 63 COMMUNITY NEEDS Sports Fields The analysis of sports fields includes a review of the number of fields by population and their geographic distribution. This analysis examines closely the potential of School District owned facilities to provide additional service. When including both City-and school- owned fields, the service area analysis shows that many areas of Renton are close to an existing sports field, with the exception of portions of the East Plateau, Benson and Talbot planning areas and the potential annexation areas within Fairwood, East Plateau, Valley and West Hill. Public feedback indicated that there is a demand for youth, adult and adaptive facilities, which are defined in Chapter 2. Currently, the City of Renton provides one diamond shaped (baseball/softball) field per 26,175 residents and one rectangular shaped (soccer/football/rugby etc.) field per 104,700 residents. If School District fields are added to the existing City-owned fields, the ratio of fields to population is increased to one diamond field per 6,159 residents and one rectangular field per 26,175 residents. The adopted level of service standard for sports fields is 1/6,663 for diamond fields and 1/10,779 for rectangular fields. As the community has grown, no new fields have been added; to meet this standard Renton would need six new soccer fields. 45%40%15%Build a new all-weather mul�-use field complex Invest more/ Should invest Same amount/ No opinion/ (NR)Invest less/ Should not invest 38%48%14%Enhance exis�ng sports fields 23%69%8%(New) Sports field Figure 4.1: Investment Priorities for Sports Fields, Community Priority Survey 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 64 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR There are limitations to the use of School District facilities. District athletic programs and school events take priority for use of these facilities even after school hours and on weekends. Outside these scheduled uses and regularly scheduled school hours, the public can access the school fields for reserved or casual play, with a few exceptions noted in Appendix A. However, many of the school fields are maintained for non-competitive use and do not meet recreation programming needs. Field capacity is based on more than the number of existing fields. The actual amount of available field time and the level of play possible (determined by the field type, maintenance level and lights) are constraining factors. Condition of fields and components (such as dugouts and equipment storage) is also an important factor. While new fields are needed, the improvement of existing fields through the installation of artificial turf (or other improved playing surfaces) and lights will increase the available playable time. The condition ratings provided in Appendix A-3 can help guide where improvements can be focused, where adding or improving key components can increase the usability of existing fields. Policy changes to ensure the efficient and intensive scheduling and use of fields will also be important. Another emerging strategy for increasing the available time is to use modified (smaller) fields, particularly for younger youth and older adult play. The configuration of fields also limits their use for programming. With most of Renton’s fields distributed one per park citywide, efficiency in maintenance or tournament play is more challenging. As fields are added the City should look for opportunities to locate multiple fields in one park site and add a special sports field complex. Even with new fields, it is unlikely the City can meet the standard alone. Partnerships and updated agreements with the School District will be important to reaching the standard level of service for fields. Playgrounds According to recreation participation and public involvement findings, playground use is a popular activity with one of the highest participation rates. The City provides playground equipment at approximately 75% of its neighborhood parks and just less than half of its community parks. Access to playgrounds is an important part of having parks within a 10 minute walk of every home. Young people describe being physically active as “joyful” and “stress relieving.” Free play, especially outdoors, is important for kids. It is essential to healthy development, contributing to cognitive, physical, social and emotional well-being. It is an ideal way for parents to engage with children and serves as a primary opportunity for physical activity. Source: State of Play: Seattle-King County, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 65 COMMUNITY NEEDS Renton’s playgrounds have, in the past, been a similar set of play amenities in all parks. The City is responding to demand for specialized play opportunities, such as inclusive playgrounds, nature play or other thematic or creative play opportunities. The Meadow Crest Accessible Playground, a joint project between the City of Renton and the Renton School District, is an example of this kind of diversity in play spaces. Recent playground replacements have also moved toward more diverse play settings. The Benson and East Plateau Community Planning Areas have substantial gaps in playground service, matching the need for developed park access. While residents in these areas have access to several School District playgrounds after regular school hours, additional playgrounds are recommended. Based on the location of existing playgrounds, the Community Planning Areas of Talbot and Valley are also short on nearby access to City and/or school playgrounds. Additional playgrounds should be considered for Talbot while the Valley area is primarily commercial/ industrial and therefore has a limited need for children’s playgrounds. INDOOR PROGRAMMABLE SPACES Indoor programmable spaces include public facilities available to serve small or large events and programs. Larger facilities typically include multiple specialized spaces (such as banquet rooms, gymnasiums or fitness studios) while smaller facilities may have one gym, general classroom space or special purpose spaces. Renton currently has one large indoor programmable space (the Renton Community Center) and 8 smaller scale facilities5, which range from neighborhood park buildings to the Senior Activity Center. An evaluation of the quantity of facilities by population results in a ratio of one facility per 11,633 residents or 8.6 square feet/person. The quantity of buildings is just one factor in evaluating the need for indoor space. Other factors include quality and distribution. Quality is related to the ability of a building to facilitate recreation. Smaller buildings provide a more limited range of recreation options. Indoor space is expensive to build and maintain. Existing buildings 5 Does not include Renton History Museum, Carco Theater, Maplewood Golf Course or Liberty Park building which are all City-owned and independently operated. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 66 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR require periodic reinvestment to ensure that they are optimized, operationally effective and efficient to maintain. Updates to the facilities and programming at the Renton Community Center, Senior Activity Center, and the Highlands Neighborhood Center have increased community use and interest in these spaces. Due to the Great Recession, public interest shifting away from drop-in programming and the physical limitations of the smallest neighborhood park buildings, Renton has closed the buildings in several neighborhood parks. The City should focus improvements on the locations that have the most potential and interest in programming through partnerships. One example of a success is the updates to the Highlands Neighborhood Center for the STREAM (science, technology, recreation, environment, art, and math) Team program, a partnership of Renton recreation with Techbridge Girls, the Environmental Science Center, and Centro Rendu of St. Vincent de Paul funded by a King County Best Starts for Kids Grant. Larger facilities with a more complete range of programming opportunities, provide more recreation value and greater flexibility and have lower operating costs. Larger facilities draw people from a further distance. For these reasons, a geographic analysis of indoor programmable spaces focused on a travel distance of two miles6. The analysis indicated that the City needs to add two large scale facilities to serve the community, one in the Highlands/East Plateau and a second in either Talbot or Benson. As of 2019, the City, in partnership with the Family First Community Center Foundation, the Renton School District and HealthPoint is planning and fundraising for The Family First Center, a large-scale facility in the Benson Community Planning Area. The City’s facilities could also be further augmented by school buildings if additional public access is secured through partnership with the Renton School District. Specialized Facilities Specialized facilities serve the entire city or at a minimum, a substantial portion of the city. Due to the nature of these facilities, the geographic distribution of specialized facilities is not necessarily as important as their quality and existing capacity. Residents feel that 6 This analysis was not repeated in 2019 because the location of facilities had not changed. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 67 COMMUNITY NEEDS Renton’s recreation facilities are important assets. As such, adequate repair and maintenance is needed to sustain these resources and extend their lifespan. The community has expressed demand for the following specialized facilities. It will be important to consider opportunities to add these facilities as parks are developed or renovated. • Swimming Pools/Aquatic Facilities: The City of Renton owns and operates the Henry Moses Aquatic Center which offers outdoor swimming and water play, including lessons and fitness classes. On warm days, the demand can far exceed the capacity. The Renton School District currently owns, manages and maintains two existing indoor pools. The community expressed that there is insufficient time available for open swim and swim lessons at these facilities. • Skate Parks: While there is continued use of Renton’s existing skate park, public demand has leveled off (along with national trends in skateboarding participation). The existing Liberty Park facility is important and could be supplemented by small skate spots in other areas of the community to improve access. • Water Access Facilities: Access to Lake Washington for swimming, motorized and non-motorized boating (including sailing, canoeing, and kayaking) is provided at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Additional water access facilities are included at Kennydale Beach Park (swimming), Cedar River Trail Park (non-motorized boat launch) and the Cedar River Boathouse (rowing, canoe and kayak rentals, lessons and access) as well as Riverview Park on the Cedar River (non- motorized boat access). Demand for water access facilities is very high, and additional facilities to support rowing, sailing and other small craft are desired. Improvements at some of these locations will also enhance public access. • Dog Parks: There is demand for at least one large and/or several smaller permanent off-leash areas, based on public involvement findings. New facilities should be geographically dispersed and could be provided in areas with high or increasing residential density (where yard space for dogs is limited). RESOLUTION NO. 4398 68 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR • Outdoor Courts: Renton has 17 tennis courts and 13 basketball courts located mostly in neighborhood and community parks. Additional courts are located at Renton School District sites, although not all are available to the public. Additional outdoor courts for basketball, tennis, pickleball and volleyball should be considered in new park design and construction, filling gaps in service throughout the park system. • Community Gardens: The City provides two community gardens and has supported expansion of community gardening in partnerships and through the Neighborhood Grant Program. • Interpretive Facilities: The City has a limited number of interpretive facilities which currently include signage and educational kiosks within the park system. The public expressed an interest in providing more of these education- based amenities telling the story of Renton’s natural environment, culture and history throughout the park system. Interpretive facilities should focus on unique or readily accessible natural areas such as the Cedar River and the Black River Riparian Forest. RECREATION PROGRAMMING NEEDS The Recreation Division has been engaged in a parallel strategic planning effort that has identified gaps in the program offerings and populations within the Renton community that can benefit from enhanced programming. The gaps in programming present opportunities for the City to improve and modify program offerings or identify partners to take the lead. Within recreation programming the rapid pace of change in trends and community demand requires timely updating of internal planning documents that guide the Division. These gaps and focus populations should be considered a snapshot in time that will continue to be updated in the Recreation and Neighborhoods Strategic and Operations Plan effort and ongoing program planning. A survey of STREAM Team youth participants indicated: 69% have learned what they do affects the natural environment 66% are learning ways to protect the environment Source: STREAM Team Outcomes Report, Renton Recreation and Neighborhoods Division, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 69 COMMUNITY NEEDS Program Area Gaps Some of the identified gaps have park facility implications, while others represent new or enhanced efforts that are needed to close the gaps. • Year-round playable sports fields, • Adaptive sports fields, • Adaptive recreational programming for youth and those with emotional and sensory needs, • Green space for open play, differentiated from scheduled and programmed space, • Year-round swimming access (safety, swim lessons), • Environmental education, • Recreational programming for tween and teen girls, and • Programming around new technology and cultural arts could be provided in partnership with the School District, private and community organizations Focus Populations Within each of the general categories of population that Recreation is aiming to better serve, there are specific sub-groups and topics that require additional attention. • Preschool – up to 5: early childhood education, which can take many forms, • Youth: programming that serves the unique needs of girls in this age range, • Teens: programming that serves the unique needs of girls in this age range, • Adults: social gatherings and activities, • Seniors: addressing younger and working seniors; supporting seniors raising grandchildren, • Adaptive: specifically, for those with spectrum, sensory and emotional needs, Washingtonians participate in outdoor recreation more than 445 million days each year, or on average, we spend 56 days a year recreating outdoors. Of all the places there are to go, local parks are the most visited. Source: Economic Benefits of Outdoor Recreation in Washington Factsheet, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 70 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR Talbot Rd SNewcastle G o l f C l u b R d SW 27th St SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd S 133rd St Edmonds Ave NENE 4th St SE May Va l l e y R d 156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SESW Grady Way 116th Ave SEW M e r c e r W a y Puget Dr SEBenson D r SLogan Ave NE Valley HwySW 41st St S 3rd St SW 7th St Union Ave NE87th Ave SLake Wa sh ing ton B lvd N Renton Ave S W Valley HwyHoquiam Ave NEFAIRWOOD KING COUNTY TUKWILA KENT NEWCASTLE KING COUNTY MERCER ISLAND BELLEVUE LakeWashington Lake Youngs LakeDesire Shady Lake Green River Cedar R i v e r PantherLake LakeBoren May Creek SpringbrookCreek Cedar R iver §¨¦405 §¨¦405 §¨¦5 §¨¦5 ST851 ST716 RentonMunicipalAirport 1 2 3 4 5 678910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Cougar Mountain Regional Wildland Park Soos Creek Park and Trail Soos Creek Park and Trail Fort Dent County Park May Valley County Park Renton Park May Creek Greenway McGarvey Park Open Space Metro Waterwork Park Cavanaugh Pond Natural Area Clarke Beach Park Lakeridge Park Bryn Mawr Boulevard Lane Park Black RiverRiparian Forest Cedar RiverNatural Area SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands Panther CreekWetlands May CreekGreenway Honey CreekGreenway RentonWetlands ° 0 ½ 1¼ Mile Other Park and Recreation Facilities Parks Provided by Others Schools Natural Area Access 1/2 Mile Renton Owned/Maintained Pedestrian Service Area 1/2 Mile Other Agency Owned/ Maintained Pedestrian Service Area Pedestrian Barrier (Highways) Base Map Features Renton City Boundary Potential Annexation Areas Renton Park and Recreation Facilities Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Open Space Trail Corridor Special Use Future ParkSources: City of Renton and King County GIS, 2019.September 2019Sunset Neighborhood Park Riverview Park Maplewood Roadside Park Glencoe Park Senior Activity Center and Community Garden Jones Park Liberty Park Cedar River Park Piazza & Gateway Veterans Memorial Park Sit In Park Burnett Linear Park Maplewood Park Lake Street Open Space Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Parkwood South Park SE 186th Place Properties Tiany Park / Cascade Park Connection 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 18 1 Tonkin Park Natural Area Access RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 71 COMMUNITY NEEDS • Multi-cultural: reflect the demographics of the city through arts and culture, and • Families: family events, resources for family conversations. NATURAL AREA AND RESOURCE NEEDS The evaluation of the City’s natural areas and resources included an evaluation of public access to these lands, as well as an assessment of overall value and condition (level of maintenance). This built on several prior studies including the Urban Tree Canopy Assessment and individual site visits. Access to Natural Areas Because of the importance and desire of having nearby access to natural areas in Renton, the natural areas assessment used a half- mile travel distance, equivalent to a 10 minute walk (see Natural Area Access Map). Renton’s natural areas are located along wetlands and the rivers and creeks that flow through the city. Recent additions to natural areas in Renton have expanded existing natural areas to support needed habitat continuity. However, all Community Planning Areas within the city have areas that are unserved by natural areas within a half-mile distance. Natural areas cannot be dispersed throughout the city in the same way neighborhood parks can. Therefore, corridors and trail connections are essential for improving access to natural areas. Existing trails in natural areas are generally short, discontinuous and designed for foot traffic only. In areas with sensitive ecosystems, these limits on trails are necessary to protect sensitive natural areas. However, there are also several challenges associated with a disconnected trail system. A shortage of trails makes site management more challenging. In the absence of formal trails, users are more likely to create their own trails for cut-through travel or recreation purposes. Based on these conditions, there is a need for improved system-wide management of Renton’s natural areas, basing decisions on future site improvements and restoration efforts on well informed data and planning. Outdoor recreation not only creates jobs and builds businesses, it cuts health care costs, brings families closer together, helps kids learn in school, and protects the environment. Source: Economic Benefits of Outdoor Recreation in Washington Factsheet, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 72 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR Management of Natural Areas Management of Renton’s natural areas is an important need. Findings from the public involvement process indicate that residents feel strongly about balancing public access to natural resource areas with the need to protect and conserve these important assets. The City’s salmon habitat, tree canopy and natural areas are all important components of the community’s identity. There is a need to manage, maintain and restore natural areas to support environmental and community health. The future management and maintenance of natural areas within the city will require coordination to ensure efficient and strategic use of resources. Many urban natural areas in the Pacific Northwest face similar management challenges, in that they contain degraded ecosystems that are relatively small and fragmented. Invasive species often overcome native ones, and these areas can be subject to dumping, encroachments, vandalism and homeless camping. Many, if not most, urban natural areas have been left undeveloped because they are very steep, unstable, wet or subject to flooding. Access to these areas, for recreation or for maintenance, is often difficult. Renton’s natural areas are faced with multiple ongoing challenges. Heightened management and maintenance of natural resources is needed with special attention toward addressing invasive species. Appendix B provides a Natural Areas Evaluation Tool that the City can use to systematically prioritize and manage its natural areas. This tool utilizes a systematic continuum approach to prioritizing and managing these areas. The approach begins with Natural Areas 37% of responses 268 votes Neighborhood Parks 25% of responses 181 votes Special Use Parks 19% of responses 139 votes Community Parks 18% of responses 127 votes Figure 4.2: Open House #2 Online and In-Person, 2019 Community Priority Investment by Park Type RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 73 COMMUNITY NEEDS inventorying natural areas and moves into stabilization, at which point the natural area is no longer deteriorating, and then improvement, and gradually, restoration and maintenance. The tool provides guidance about the types of maintenance and restoration that are needed at each phase of the continuum. It also includes prioritization criteria that will help the City score sites and decide which natural areas to focus on first for the development of management plans. STAFFING NEEDS The Community Services Department is the primary manager of the park, recreation and natural area system in Renton and is responsible for parks, trails, building structures, recreational programs, events and volunteer activities. In recent years, the Department’s organization has evolved. While the Department is still organized into eight divisions (Administration, Facilities, Golf Course, Human Services, Museum, Parks & Trails, Parks Planning & Natural Resources, and Recreations & Neighborhoods), there have been shifts in responsibilities within the Department and within the larger City of Renton organization. The Golf Course Division operates the Maplewood Golf Course as a stand-alone enterprise. Five other Community Services divisions are responsible for services related to parks, recreation and natural areas in Renton. The staffing analysis focused on these five divisions, named and described in Table 4.5. Table 4.5: Community Services Department: Divisions and Responsibilities DIVISION 2019 RESPONSIBILITIES Administration Provides management and direction for the entire department. Facilities Develops and maintains City buildings and manages the delivery of building-related services to the public and the City workforce in a safe, customer-focused manner. Parks & Trails Maintains parks, park lands, natural areas and outdoor recreation facilities. Includes the Department’s Volunteer Coordinator and Farmer’s Market Coordinator. Parks Planning & Natural Resources Responsible for systemwide parks and natural area planning, capital improvement planning, property acquisition, and capital development. Includes the Urban Forestry & Natural Resources Manager. Recreation & Neighborhoods Provides opportunities for the public to participate in diverse recreational, cultural, athletic and aquatic programs and activities. Responsible for neighborhood services (community engagement and events). Note: The Renton History Museum is not included for the purposes of this analysis. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 74 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR By the nature of its work, the Community Services Department has a mix of full-time and part-time staff. Full-time staff work 2080 hours per year. Staffing levels are expressed in terms of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) for ease of comparison. A part-time staff person who works 520 hours in a year is considered 0.25 FTE. Examining the staffing levels over time shows that while Renton’s population has grown by 165%, staffing has remained relatively the same the last 28 years. Historically, between 1990 and 2005, staff increased along with population. However, staff reductions occurred during the Great Recession. This reduction in staffing coincided with a significant growth in population through annexations. In addition, the Community Services Department also inherited new programs and associated workload from Community and Economic Development, including the Farmer’s Market, the Neighborhood program and special events permitting. Staffing Service Levels Parks and recreation providers have a long history of evaluating their park systems and services based on population metrics, often expressed in terms such as cost per capita (resident population) or units per 1,000 or 10,000 residents (e.g., 3 acres per 1,000 residents). Staffing can be evaluated similarly, such as number of staff per 1,000 population or square footage/acres maintained per Full Time Equivalent (FTE) employee. These calculations allow agencies to measure service levels over time and to compare themselves to others more easily. The State of Staffing in Summary In addition, a more in-depth Staffing analysis was evaluated by division over time, examining the following trends: • Acres maintained per employee, • Recreation staff per 1,000 residents, • Square footage of buildings maintained per employee, and • Number of contract landscape maintenance sites per employee. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 75 COMMUNITY NEEDS The analysis revealed only a slight increase in staffing levels from 1990 to 2018 overall for parks, recreation and natural areas, despite: • More park and natural area acres to maintain, • More building square footage to maintain, • More people to serve, • More events, and • A larger Renton due to expanded city limits. Staffing levels have not kept pace with increasing workload. Renton has used approaches such as contracting and increasing the use of part-time and seasonal employees. However, the number of managers to oversee contracts and staff has not been increased and strategic approaches to managing and maintaining the system into the future are essential to facilitating a sustainable system. SUMMARY OF NEEDS The analysis of demand and needs presented in this chapter is broad in scope and begins to describe the gap between today and the park, recreation and natural areas system envisioned by the community. These needs will not be met all at once, and in fact some may not be able to be realized over the life of this Plan. The following chapters describe what the City should do to address these needs and how to prioritize projects. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 76 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FOUR This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 5 RECOMMENDATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 4398 78 | CITY OF RENTON Meeting community needs for parks, recreation facilities, programming and natural areas will require a strategic approach to park system investment. This chapter presents both system-wide recommendations for the entire City, as well as specific projects and park improvements for each Community Planning Area. RECOMMENDATIONS SYSTEM-WIDE RECOMMENDATIONS The system-wide recommendations respond directly to the goals presented in Chapter 1. At the system- wide scale, there are eight overarching recommendations. Provide Nearby Parks, Recreation Facilities, Programming And Natural Areas As shown in the access analysis maps, many areas are not served by existing parks, recreation facilities and natural areas. Some neighborhoods are not currently served by parks, while barriers such as busy streets limit safe access to other park sites. System-wide recommendations for addressing parks need to include the following: RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 79 • Implement a ½-mile (10 minute walk) service area to developed parks: The City should continue to provide developed parks and natural areas within a ½-mile service (10 minute walk) distance. Removing or mitigating barriers to existing parks and acquiring and/or developing new parks in underserved neighborhoods will increase access to parks and natural areas. • Implement a ¼-mile (5 minute walk) service area to developed parks in higher density areas: In areas zoned high density residential, the service distance to developed parks and natural areas should be decreased and new facilities should be added to serve the population within one-quarter mile. Currently, most high density residential areas are underserved by local parks within a ¼-mile service area. • Maintain a developed park land level of service of 5.07 acres per 1,000 residents: To meet existing and future needs, the City should continue to provide adequate developed parks to residents (particularly neighborhood and community parks). Developing park land already purchased by the City would keep the community at the level of service goal. Additional acreage purchases should also address quality, access and distribution criteria. • Develop new parks and improve existing parks according to the design guidelines: In order to fully address park needs, all parks should meet the design guidelines, including the minimum size guideline and recommended features at each park. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 80 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE Reinvest In Renton’s Community Assets Many of Renton’s parks were initially designed and developed between the 1960s and the 1980s. The benefits of mature parks include beautiful fully grown trees. Due to the age of the parks, many are in need of re-evaluation and updating. • Major maintenance: In order to extend the life of the major features of Renton’s parks and recreation facilities larger maintenance projects (beyond the repair, clean-up and wear and tear) are needed. To complement the Facilities Assessment the City should develop a Renovation and Refurbishment Plan, by park and asset category, and report their status (including completed projects, new projects, critical needs and the consequences of inaction) annually. Major maintenance projects should be completed as resources are available starting with any critical needs. • Systematically reinvest in features that are beyond their useful life: Recognizing that each building and park feature has a limited lifespan, the City should track the anticipated replacement year for major building and park features in all parks through the Facilities Assessment and a Renovation and Refurbishment Plan as noted above. Expanding on the Facilities Division’s inventory of building systems that will need replacement by year, the City should track playgrounds, sports fields (particularly as artificial turf becomes a feature in the system), irrigation, picnic areas and hard surfaces such as parking, trails and courts. • Increase resources for maintaining parks, recreation facilities and natural areas: Renton has a need for more resources to sustain its parks, recreation and natural areas system with population growth leading to increased wear and tear. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 81 RECOMMENDATIONS Expand and Support Renton’s Professional Parks, Recreation and Facilities Staff The City’s recovery from the Great Recession has left the parks, recreation, facilities and natural areas professional staff with an increased workload, limiting their effectiveness. Reconsideration of roles and additional staff capacity will create the opportunity to implement other recommendations in this Plan. • Expand capacity through administrative staff: Community Services is lean in its administrative staff and staffing resources should be evaluated to expand capacity, including for grant administration. • Provide adequate supervisory staff for seasonal employees: Renton has relied heavily on seasonal employees. Seasonal employees have a greater draw on supervisory staff due to their youth, their shorter-term tenure and the consequent need for retraining a new set of employees each season. Many seasonal employees are frontline, meaning that they interface with customers. They require customer service training as well as on-going job specific training in order to understand and execute the job requirements. Another strategy to consider is shifting from a model of more seasonal staff to increased year-round staff to more effectively meet community needs. • Re-evaluate landscape maintenance contracts: Consider adding a contract specialist position in the Parks & Trails division. As contracts expire, reevaluate the contract terms with the dual goals of streamlining management and encouraging a strong pool of bidders. Explore adding landscape maintenance inspection to the job duties of one or more maintenance workers. • Free up the Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager from landscape contract management: This would allow more attention to urban forestry program development and natural resource management activities, areas where there is significant community interest. Consider combining natural areas management and environmental education programs under the Urban Forestry and Natural Resources Manager. 87% of respondents to the 2017 NRPA Americans’ Engagement with Parks Survey agree that their local government and local park and recreation agency should make the needed investments to ensure their communities are more resilient to natural disasters. Source: Economic Impact of Local Parks, National Recreation and Park Association, 2018 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 82 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE • Continue to pursue more formal non-profit partner approaches: Renton has partnered with community organizations to provide programming with mixed results. More structured criteria for selecting operators and more detailed lease requirements (if applicable) can lead to longer-term success. Increase Park and Recreation Capacity and Use A few parks receive the majority of use in Renton, such as Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and Liberty Park, which provide water access and sports fields respectively. Specific recommendations to increase the potential capacity and use of frequently-used parks include the following: • Redevelop parks for a larger population: Re-master plan parks to maximize their use. Expand or rebuild recreational facilities and supporting infrastructure at popular existing sites to accommodate a greater number of users. This may be accomplished by expanding or renovating facilities (such as the Henry Moses Aquatic Center and Renton Community Center) to larger, more flexible facilities that can fulfill unmet need and demand. • Reimagine how parks and other public spaces work together: Some parks are clustered (such as Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and N.A.R.CO property) and others have close associations with other public facilities such as schools or libraries. These sites create opportunities to increase the benefits of each facility through partnered improvements or programming connections. Policy changes and pilot programming can explore and encourage these connections. • Increase awareness of Renton’s parks, recreation programs and natural areas: Communicate the range of recreation opportunities in Renton. Provide a high quality online presence including the city website and social media to help users easily find and access parks and recreation amenities and offerings, supplementing printed guides (such as Let’s Go Renton) and maps. Use high traffic park sites such as Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and the Cedar River Trail to inform users about other park sites and recreation programs. Create Parks and trails development can also benefit local environments and support community wellness. Sensitive areas such as flood plains may be protected, ecosystem services preserved, and areas prone to natural disasters shielded from development that would put people at heightened risk. Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Park Service. Parks, Trails, and Health Workbook. Washington, DC: National Park Service; 2015. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 83 RECOMMENDATIONS a comprehensive signage and wayfinding system in all new and existing parks and natural areas. Signs should be both informative (e.g., directional signage) and interpretive (e.g., describing history, culture and the environment), with a consistent design style. • Incorporate unique features that contribute to community identity: Recognize elements of Renton that are important to residents such as indigenous people, water access and salmon. Elements that proudly represent Renton’s character and community values can be carried forward into the park system through interpretive displays, public art and integration into play structures and environments. Improve Management of Natural Areas Enhanced management is needed in natural areas, balancing public use with protection and conservation. Through individual management plans, the City can determine long- and short- term goals and priorities for natural areas. System-wide recommendations include the following: • Conduct natural area inventories: The City should conduct natural area inventories to inform management decisions for these areas. Inventories should specify site characteristics and identify threats to sensitive areas, as well as suitability for public use. • Manage natural areas using a continuum approach: Based on the inventories and the criteria established in the Natural Area Evaluation Tool in Appendix B, the City should evaluate sites and apply a management strategy along a continuum from minimal maintenance to maintaining a restored natural area. Improve Access to Sports Fields The sports field needs assessment revealed a significant demand and need for additional and improved sports fields. System-wide recommendations include the following: • Sustain sports field level of service: The sports field level of service standard for diamond (1/6,663) and rectangle RESOLUTION NO. 4398 84 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE (1/10,779) is the minimum service level that is required to meet community needs. To meet this need, the community needs access to City fields and Renton School District fields. • Collaborate on sport field scheduling and maintenance: Develop a partnership model with the Renton School District (and potentially regional partners such as Starfire Sports and neighboring cities) that equalizes the quality of surfaces and maintenance efforts to a standard based on the intended level of play. • New and improved fields at existing feasible locations: Organized sports benefit from concentrations of fields. Improvements to sport fields in collaboration with the school district should target sites where there is potential for a concentration of fields (larger school sites and potential new parks) or improvements that increase playable time such as artificial turf and field lights. • Establish sports field use standards: Establish standards for the amount of game and practice time each type of field can support, as well as standards for field maintenance. Because there is high demand for field use and limited supply, Renton should adopt standards to ensure that fields are not overused and are available for reservable practices and games. • Sports field complex: Provide high quality, co-located fields to meet the demand and need for a facility to support tournament play. Increase Recreational Variety A variety of recreation facilities are needed, and technology should be utilized to expand and enhance recreational facilities and programming. A parallel Recreation and Neighborhood Strategic and Operations Plan, which will further address facility needs, is currently under development. Specific recommendations at the system-wide level include: • Introduce variety in the opportunities for children’s play: Provide new playgrounds in underserved areas and integrate nature play areas in parks and natural areas where possible. The most common reason for going to a park is “bringing children.” Play areas account for 25% of children’s park use. Every play element added to a playground increases its use by 50%. City Parks Alliance, Recommendations from the national Study of Neighborhood Parks, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 85 RECOMMENDATIONS Continue to incorporate unique and adaptive play spaces, such as thematic playgrounds and barrier-free play areas. • Provide more facilities to support community events and family activities: Provide spaces and reservable facilities (e.g., picnic shelters) in underserved areas of the City. Existing smaller and underused spaces can be redesigned to include amenities for events and picnics. • Design and build off-leash dog facilities: Develop new off- leash dog areas in new or existing park sites. • Increase opportunities for swimming and water play: Expand the Henry Moses Aquatic Center to create increased capacity for programming and open swim/water play. Consider enclosing the lap pool to provide for year-round use. Add interactive fountains or spray parks to larger sites to provide closer-to-home opportunities for water play. • Improve water access: Prioritize waterfront property for acquisition due to the rarity and multiple values it provides the system. Continue partnerships that offer opportunities for rowing, sailing, kayaking and canoeing. Provide enhanced boating storage and support facilities. Seek partnerships with established groups or organizations for increased programming opportunities. Connect the Park and Natural Area System Connecting parks and trails is a top community priority. Securing the corridors that link parks and connect neighborhoods and community destinations are critical to providing non-motorized transportation options and natural system benefits. The City of Renton adopted the updated Trails and Bicycle Master Plan in 2019. The Plan reflects the desire to create an interconnected pedestrian, and non- motorized transportation network to accommodate recreation and commuter uses. Based on the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan, as well as community input generated for the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan, system-wide recommendations include the following: • Implement trails plan priorities: Continue to implement priorities identified in the City’s Trails and Bicycle Master Plan (trail map included in Appendix E). A survey of STREAM Team youth partici- pants indicated: 68% have developed skills they can use (computer, art, science, or language) 70% enjoy organized games and being more active since coming to STREAM Team Source: STREAM Team Outcomes Report, Renton Recreation and Neighborhoods Divi- sion, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 86 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE • Increase system-wide connectivity: Increase connectivity between downtown, the Cedar River Planning Area and surrounding neighborhoods. • Support regional trails and connections: This includes the Lake to Sound Trail, Renton Connector, Cedar River Trail, and Eastrail corridors. • Support trail user navigation and information needs: Create a unified park and trail wayfinding signage system to draw people to Renton’s parks and trails; provide informational kiosks and signs to formalize additional trailheads. • Remove/mitigate barriers: Address barriers facing bicycle and pedestrian travel, such as disconnected streets and limited crossing points due to major roadways and highways. Build Partnerships Through Programming The City of Renton has successfully collaborated with partners to enhance recreation services and programming. These relationships can be strengthened, and new partnerships developed, to extend recreational opportunities. System-wide recommendations include: • Build and strengthen partnerships: Collaborative partnerships can help better utilize and maximize existing facilities. • Further develop the relationship with the Renton School District: Increase use of school facilities through the development of a strong interlocal agreement with the Renton School District. Many Renton neighborhoods rely on use of local schools for recreation and play. • Focus recreational programming: Evaluate existing and future recreation program offerings to provide evidence- based programming based on emerging academic research. • Base programming decisions on recreation data: The City should rely on data collected from recreation program registration, attendance and regional trends to help evaluate future offerings and scheduling. Programming each additional supervised activity increased park use by 48% and physical activity by 37%. Programming can help attract more seniors and teen girls— both underrepresented in parks. City Parks Alliance, Recommendations from the National Study of Neighborhood Parks, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 87 RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AREA Recommendations for the City’s ten Community Planning Areas are noted below. Each section includes a description of the Community Planning Area, a list of recommended projects and bulleted recommendations. Community Planning Areas Ten Community Planning Areas were established by the Renton City Council in 2009 to reflect unique factors such as community identity, physical features, schools, data collection units, existing infrastructure, service areas, districts, boundaries and community access. The ten Community Planning Areas were utilized through this process and are illustrated in Figure 5.1. COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS Benson .................89 Cedar River .......93 City Center .......97 East Plateau ...101 Highlands .........105 Kennydale .........109 Talbot .....................111 Valley ......................113 West Hill ..............115 Fairwood .............116 Area Page Figure 5.1: Community Planning Areas RESOLUTION NO. 4398 88 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 89 RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIPTION The Benson Community Planning Area was annexed into the City by an election in 2007 (effective 2008). The area includes over four square miles of land in southeast Renton. This large area currently includes two developed neighborhood parks owned by the City (Tiffany Park and Cascade Park) and two additional developed parks which remain under King County’s management (Boulevard Lane Park and Renton Park). It is bordered by the Cedar River Natural Area to the north and the King County managed (undeveloped) Soos Creek Corridor to the east. The Renton School District operates seven facilities in this area, including four elementary, one middle, one high school and one alternative program. The area is primarily composed of single-family homes, with a denser cluster of residences and commercial activity centered generally between SE 168th and SE Petrovitsky on 116th Ave SE. The area is crossed by several major utility corridors, many of which have been used as informal transportation and recreation links. The majority of the Benson area has little or no access to developed parks and minimal public land. Expanding park service in this area will be a challenge. While both large and small parks are needed to provide local access, the priority expressed by the community is to start with a larger, multi-purpose site. Until more parks can be added, connections and other facilities will be critical, particularly developing the Soos Creek Trail (King County). Acquire and Develop a New Community Park: 1 The long-standing need for a new community recreation center in the Benson Area is being fulfilled through a unique community partnership. The Family First Community Center is a joint project of the City of Renton, the Projects • Benson Community Park • Tiffany Park • Cascade Park • SE 186th Place Properties • Soos Creek Greenway: Boulevard Lane • Parkwood South Div #3 Park • Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park • Benson Neighborhood Park 1 • Benson Neighborhood Park 2 BENSON RESOLUTION NO. 4398 90 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE Family First Community Center Foundation, the Renton School District and HealthPoint that aims to create a building and set of programs that help families achieve goals in education, fitness and overall health. Fundraising is ongoing for the construction of the center, which is planned to open in 2021. Enhance and Connect Tiffany and Cascade Parks: 2 The City has acquired additional land between these two park sites that should be enhanced as a natural area and trail. Additional acquired land along 126th Avenue has added to the access and visibility of Cascade Park. Additional land purchase opportunities should be monitored to further open access and connect these parks. Both sites should be renovated to update, add and reorganize facilities. Cascade Park should be considered for an off-leash dog area and Tiffany Park has the potential to daylight a creek; restoring a natural feature long hidden underground. As part of the improvements to these sites, formal connections should be made to access utility corridors that are currently used as trails, also necessitating formalized agreements with utility companies. When the two parks are connected and linked to these long pedestrian routes, the Tiffany/Cascade Park complex will become a hub for nature, environmental learning and trail activity. The concept plan in Chapter 7 provides a vison for these improvements. Add and Develop Park Land: To increase access to basic park features, a number of additional neighborhood parks are needed in the Benson Community Planning Area. Two small sites are owned by the City (both transferred from King County) but neither come close to the minimum size needed to provide the desired features of a neighborhood park. At the Parkwood South Division #3 Park sites the City should evaluate the property’s potential for park use due to small size and separation. The best opportunity or use for the SE 186th Place Properties is a playground, community garden or a tree nursery. In the Benson planning area, augmenting Renton School District sites will be a key strategy to providing park service. The City should work with the School District to secure increased access to indoor facilities for programming through negotiated agreements. The City should also work with the District to acquire small park sites adjacent to schools to provide access to play opportunities. Beyond the existing parks and school sites, two additional neighborhood park sites should be identified. 3 4 Both identified RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 91 RECOMMENDATIONS SE 168th St SE Petrovitsky Rd 124th Ave SE116th Ave SEPuget Dr SEBenson D r S S 3rd St Soos Creek Park and Trail RentonPark Soos CreekPark and Trail BoulevardLane Park MaplewoodGolf CourseCedar RiverNatural Area EdlundProperty CascadePark Cleveland /Richardson Property Panther CreekWetlands PhilipArnold Park TianyPark ThomasTeasdale Park N.A.R.COProperty Lindbergh High School Fred Nelsen Middle School Cascade Elementary School Benson Hill Elementary School Renton Park Elementary Tiany Park Elementary School New Horizon School CedarRiver Park RiverviewPark MaplewoodPark Talbot HillReservoir Park Sit InPark ParkwoodSouth Park SE 186th PlaceProperties BurnettLinear Park Lake StreetOpen Space TonkinPark Piazza & Gateway Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # Benson Planning Area 1 23 4 gap areas are hilly and isolated from other parks by distance and topography. Partner for Indoor Programming Space: As noted above, schools will be important assets to expanding park and recreation access into Benson and the Family First Community Center will be a major new asset in this area when it opens. Complete Soos Creek Corridor: The City should continue collaborating with King County to expand and connect the Soos Creek properties to protect the creek and surrounding habitat and provide a regional trail connection which also will connect with the Cedar River Trail. With the completion of the Soos Creek Trail, one park and one natural area (Boulevard Lane Park and Renton Park) could be transferred to the City for operation and management. Renton Park should be developed to connect with the adjacent Renton Park Elementary and Lindberg High School serving as an outdoor learning environment. Integrate Utility Corridors: The City should actively pursue agreements with the utility companies that maintain corridors through the Benson Community Planning Area and other parts of Renton. These corridors currently provide informal access to pedestrians, hikers and cyclists. However, because of their informal status, the City has no authority to improve trails or provide better access. Agreements should outline roles and responsibilities as well as the limitations and requirements of the utility use. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 92 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 93 RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIPTION The Cedar River Community Planning Area follows the Cedar River and the Maple Valley Highway from Interstate 405 to the Renton city limits. Many of the well-known, most-used parks in the system are located within this Community Planning Area, along with the largest natural area. There are several small developments of high- and low- density housing along the highway corridor that are relatively isolated from each other and the remainder of the city. The Cedar River Community Planning Area contains the largest portion of a recreation corridor that extends from Lake Washington to Renton’s eastern city limits. Most of the community’s signature natural areas, recreation sites and facilities are located within this region. The improvements to the system in this area are focused on the enhancement of existing sites and facilities to increase capacity and quality. RECOMMENDATIONS Implement the Tri-Park Master Plan: This Community Planning Area includes two of the three Tri-Park Master Plan sites, Cedar River Park and the N.A.R.CO property. The Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan for all three parks (incorporating Liberty Park as well) presented in Chapter 7 envisions reconfiguring many of the existing uses to take better advantage of the riverfront, maximize the sports field concentrations and expand the Henry Moses Aquatic Center and the Renton Community Center. This set of opportunities would recognize the role these sites play as a central hub of Renton’s parks, recreation and natural areas system. CEDAR RIVER Projects • Cedar River Park • Ron Regis Park • Cedar River Natural Area • N.A.R.CO Property • Cedar River Trail Corridor • Maplewood Golf Course • Riverview Park • Maplewood Roadside Park • Maplewood Park RESOLUTION NO. 4398 94 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE Provide Additional Sport Fields: Two sites in this Community Planning Area offer the best existing opportunity to provide clusters of sports fields in Renton. The fields planned as part of the Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan at Cedar River Park and the N.A.R.CO property 1 will provide a central home for field sports, as originally shown in the Tri-Park Master Plan. Washington State Department of Transportation will provide or contribute to these improvements as part of I-405 expansion projects. The overall Riverside Park complex has the relatively unique suitability for tournament level play. Fields should be designed to maximize the flexibility of field layout for different sizes of fields and alternate combined configurations (such as a cricket pitch). Existing and additional planned fields at Ron Regis Park 2 should receive playing surface and equipment improvements as well as utility connections to provide potable water service to this site. Manage Cedar River Natural Area: As the largest of the City’s major natural areas, and associated with the most significant waterway, the Cedar River Natural Area 3 should be a priority for inventory and management plan development, utilizing the continuum approach described in the Natural Area Evaluation Tool (Appendix B). As part of this effort, the City should identify and formalize access points for stewardship activities as well as trail use. Invasive species treatment should emphasize areas that have the greatest risk for further spread, both within the site and beyond, such as the river edge, SW 27th St 1 5 4 t h P l S E156th Ave SEPuget Dr SES 3rd St Soos Creek Parkand Trail MaplewoodCommunity Park Cavanaugh PondNatural Area Cedar River to LakeSammamish Trail Site CascadePark HeritageParkRenton High School Fred Nelsen Middle School Cascade Elementary School Talbot Hill Elementary School Tiany Park Elementary School Maple Heights Elementary School St. Anthony's School CedarRiver Park LibertyPark RiverviewPark MaplewoodPark JonesPark Senior ActivityCenter Property Sit InPark ParkwoodSouth Park BurnettLinear Park TonkinPark Maplewood Roadside Park Piazza & Gateway Veterans Memorial Park Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # Cedar River Planning Area 1 23 Ron RegisPark MaplewoodGolf CourseCedar RiverNatural AreaPhilipArnold Park TianyPark N.A.R.COProperty 1 4 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 95 RECOMMENDATIONS streams and creeks. The management plan should be coordinated between Renton, King County and other organizations involved in improving this watershed which provides regional recreation. Managing and maintaining the transition zones between the natural area and developed features planned at the N.A.R.CO property and the regional trail will be critical to the health of the natural systems and visitor safety. The role of this natural area in protecting the Cedar River, the site’s accessibility and the proximity to existing programming locations, make this site a prime opportunity for enhanced environmental programming and interpretation. Balance Indoor Programming Space: The Renton Community Center, at Cedar River Park 4 , is the largest indoor recreation facility provided by the City of Renton. Specific programs will be subject to additional analysis based on recreation program registration data, with important consideration given to the availability of indoor spaces for programming that reaches all community members. Partnerships could increase youth programming availability across the city. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 96 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 97 RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIPTION The core of Renton, the City Center Planning Area includes the historic downtown as well as the transitioning and industrial lands north to the edge of Lake Washington. Several signature Renton parks are located within City Center, including Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, the Piazza, Liberty Park and Cedar River Trail Park. The area also includes many community facilities, including those owned by the City and two sites owned by the Renton School District. The character of this area varies greatly from industrial and airport uses to single family homes near downtown main streets to a destination mixed-use center at The Landing. In addition, a new transit center is planned for the former Sound Ford site, as is a mixed-use redevelopment, bringing residential use to an area where there is currently none. CITY CENTER Projects • Senior Activity Center Property • Liberty Park (as part of the Riverside: Tri-Park concept plan) • Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park • Corridor Acquisition • Cedar River Trail Park • Burnett Linear Park • Philip Arnold Park • Community Garden/Greenhouse • Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 lot • City Center Neighborhood Park 1 • Boeing EIS Waterfront Park • Veterans Memorial Park • Tonkin Park • Jones Park • Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail • Sit-In Park RESOLUTION NO. 4398 98 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE The current and planned density of this area, and the diversity of activities require a range of sites as well as flexible use. With the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center Community Plan in place, the area is poised for population and economic growth that will increase the demands on the relatively limited existing park spaces. Key improvements, such as the Philip Arnold Park Renovation, to increase access and capacity will improve the City Center’s ability to serve as the heart of Renton. RECOMMENDATIONS Connect Cedar River Trail Park and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park: To complete a long-standing vision of a waterfront connection along Lake Washington, the City should build the Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail 1 utilizing easements (some already acquired) and final easement acquisition as feasible. Expand and Redevelop Senior Activity Center Site: The City should relocate the shop facilities located between the Senior Activity Center and the Community Garden (including the greenhouse) to allow for expansion of this site and a broader set of activities. A new master plan for this park should be developed for integration with the Renton Senior Activity Center and the adjacent neighborhood. With no name existing for this entire site, it is identified as City Center Neighborhood Park 1 2 in this Plan. This site should be designed for neighborhood scale activity while recognizing that this will be in the heart of the city, near downtown and on the Cedar River Trail. As a result, this park should be designed for higher intensity use. Enlarge and Enhance Existing Sites: The City should seek opportunities to expand or enhance several sites within the City Center Community Planning Area. Major renovation of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is ongoing. Redevelopment of the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big 5 lot should include a plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend beyond the existing park, creating a civic center. Connect Regional Trail Systems: City Center includes the critical connections between major regional trail systems including the Cedar River Trail, Lake to Sound Trail and Renton Connector. Burnett Linear Park should be expanded north to the area currently used as parking; strengthening the link between this park, Tonkin Park, the Piazza and the Cedar River Trail, referred to as the Renton Connector 3 . Each of these has a specific implementation plan and the completion is Renton’s older adults have voiced interest in social, educational, and preventive health focused programs. Source: Renton Older Adults Community Needs Assessment, Renton Senior Activity Center, 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 99 RECOMMENDATIONS supported by the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Secure Land for Future Parks: In addition to the master plan for the site adjacent to the Renton Senior Activity Center, the 2003 Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS identifies a 75-acre park providing a potential connection to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and the Cedar River Trail. Additional land should be acquired to provide overflow parking for Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, with an improved connection between the park and residential and commercial development at The Landing 4 . This improvement will only occur if the Boeing Company should decide to surplus the existing manufacturing facilities. This would be a truly rare opportunity for future park development, shaping the future of central Renton. Based on the priorities of the community, the most important land to secure within the current Boeing properties would be the waterfront between Cedar River Trail Park and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. The exact configuration of this new site should be carefully planned to further economic and community development and improve connectivity between Coulon Park and the Cedar River Trail. Enhance the Cedar River: The Cedar River is the major natural feature in the City Center Planning Area and the river and salmon run are closely tied to Renton’s identity. The City should SW 27th St SE 168th StPark Ave NSE Petrovitsky Rd SW Grady Way 116th Ave SEW M e r c e r W a y Puget Dr SEBenson D r SLogan Ave NSW 41st St S 3rd St SW 7th St 87th Ave SLake Wa sh ing ton B lvd N LakeridgePark Bryn Mawr LakeWashington Cedar R iver RentonMunicipalAirport Black RiverRiparian Forest Panther CreekWetlands Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park RentonWetlands EdlundPropertyRentonWetlandsPanther CreekWetlands PhilipArnold Park May CreekGreenway ThomasTeasdale Park Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center KennydaleLions Park WindsorHills Park EarlingtonPark SpringbrookTrail KennydaleBeach Park KenyonDobson Property Renton High School Fred Nelsen Middle School Cascade Elementary School John Mcknight Jr High School Talbot Hill Elementary School Tiany Park Elementary School Sartori Elementary School Kennydale Elementary School St. Anthony's School Lake StreetOpen Space Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # City Center Planning Area 1 2 3 4 5 CedarRiver Park LibertyPark JonesPark Senior ActivityCenter Property Sit InPark BurnettLinear Park TonkinPark Piazza & Gateway Veterans Memorial Park Cedar RiverTrail Park N.A.R.COProperty RESOLUTION NO. 4398 100 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE develop an enhancement and stabilization program along the Cedar River as well as continue its partnership with Forterra. Stabilization should improve and protect the health of the trees that anchor the bank as well as control invasive species. Invasive species control will likely involve removal and treatments beyond this Community Planning Area. Explore Creative Partnerships: The businesses and organizations located in City Center offer a wide range of programming possibilities. As part of the in-process Recreation and Neighborhoods Strategic and Operations Plan, the City should explore how to involve additional local businesses and community organizations. One opportunity identified during the planning process involves collaborating with the Boeing Company’s employee health program to identify walks and fitness opportunities in proximity to Boeing facilities for employees to participate in during lunch breaks or before/after work. Implement Tri-Park Master Plan and Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan for Liberty Park: See also Cedar River Community Planning Area recommendations for implementation of the Tri-Park Master Plan. Expand and enhance the community building at Liberty Park 5 for environmental education programming. Sam Chastain Waterfront TrailCCIITTYY OOFF RREENNTTOONN Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Concept RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 101 RECOMMENDATIONS Projects • East Plateau Community Park • May Creek Park • East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 • East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 DESCRIPTION The East Plateau Planning Area makes up the eastern edge of the City of Renton, north of the Cedar River. Much of this planning area is outside of the current city limits. The East Plateau has no developed City-owned parks and nearly the entire planning area is outside the ½ mile range of developed parks. Five school sites are located within the planning area, including schools in both the Renton and Issaquah districts. The character of this area is primarily residential with a high density commercial and residential corridor along NE 4th Street. There are many disconnected streets due to topography, stream corridors and development patterns. The most notable need in East Plateau is for designated park land to accommodate the recreation opportunities most desired by the community. The population in this area benefits from some access to natural areas, primarily those owned by King County. Residents of this area use school facilities and travel to other parts of the city for gathering places and indoor programming. RECOMMENDATIONS Add a New Community Park: The City should acquire the Maplewood Community Park and Maplewood Neighborhood Park sites 1 from King County with the intention of developing a unified community park connecting to the adjacent Maplewood Heights Elementary School. Following acquisition, the site should be master planned with input from the community about the specific features and design elements. Key features for a community park in this area are a concentration of sports fields (adding to existing fields at the elementary school), creating a community gathering space and maintaining the forested area with trails (see concept plan in Chapter 7). EAST PLATEAU RESOLUTION NO. 4398 102 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE Develop May Creek Park: 2 Located in the north end of the planning area, this park has remained undeveloped for many years. The site is located in a residential area that currently does not have access to a park within a 10 minute walk. This site should be developed as soon as funding can be secured. Access to this property is currently limited from Duvall Avenue and should be expanded by developing trail easements to the east and connecting local trails. The concept plan (in Chapter 7) can be used as a starting point to identify potential elements and the relationships between features. Identify and Develop Two New Neighborhood Parks: Within the current city limits, at least two additional neighborhood parks are needed to provide basic recreation amenities within a 10 minute walk (½ mile) of residents. The first of these, East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 3 , should be located in the area south of Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall, near Oliver Hazen High School. The high school campus has the potential to augment a future public park. The second additional park site (East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2) 4 should be near NE 4th Street, close to the planned higher residential and commercial density. This area has no existing publicly owned land and will require acquiring between 5 and 10 acres of park land that should be connected to bike and pedestrian routes. New neighborhood parks should be master planned and developed according to the design guidelines. Plan for Annexation Areas: If the City expands into the remaining parts of the potential annexation area, additional park sites will need to be located, potentially including the King County owned Maplewood Heights Park property. Provide Key Connections: The following trail and bicycle routes are particularly important to improving access to and from this Community Planning Area as well as within it. • The May Creek corridor crosses the north edge of the planning area and additional protected land would provide habitat and serve recreation needs. • King County’s planned Cedar to Sammamish Regional Trail connects this area to the Cedar River Planning Area to the south and exits the city to the north east. • The east-west bicycle routes planned along Sunset Boulevard and NE 4th/SE 128th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 103 RECOMMENDATIONS • Shared streets connecting to Highlands and extending east out of the City. Enhancing Existing Natural Areas: The City should support King County and City of Newcastle efforts to complete habitat restoration projects utilizing volunteers and partnerships such as the Mountain to Sound Greenway. Residents of this area who participated in the planning process indicated a desire to maintain natural elements within park sites. Acquire Natural Areas: The City should continue its partnership with King County and the City of Newcastle to identify and acquire natural area land that connects creek corridors such as May Creek. Natural area acquisitions in this Community Planning Area should have the potential to serve as habitat or trail corridors or expand existing protected areas. Programming and Facility Partnerships: Partnering with both the Renton and Issaquah School Districts will be important to providing programming options in the East Plateau. As the City of Renton expands into the Potential Annexation Area, a school partnership with the Issaquah District should be considered. 1 5 4 t h P l S E NE 4th St SE May V a l l e y R d 156th Ave SESE 128th St164th Ave SEUnion Ave NEHoquiam Ave NELake Youngs Watershed Cougar MountainRegional Wildland Park Soos Creek Parkand Trail Petrovitsky Park May ValleyCounty Park RentonPark CoaleldPark MaplewoodHeights Park McGarvey Park Open Space Lake YoungsCounty Park Cavanaugh PondNatural Area Cedar River to LakeSammamish Trail Site May Creek Greenway Ricardi ReachNatural Area Ron RegisPark MaplewoodGolf Course CascadePark KiwanisPark HeritagePark Honey Dew School Sierra Heights Elementary School Renton Park Elementary Maple Heights Elementary School Briarwood School Liberty High School Maywood Middle School GlencoePark Sunset NeighborhoodPark 1 2 3 4 Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # East Plateau Planning Area May Creek Park MaplewoodCommunity Park Hazen High School 1 3 2 4 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 104 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 105 RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIPTION The Highlands Community Planning Area is located on a plateau above the City Center Community Planning Area and the Cedar River in northwest Renton. This area includes a wide range of park lands from very small neighborhood parks to large natural area properties along Honey and May Creeks. The Renton School District operates five elementary and middle schools in or immediately adjacent to the Highlands Planning Area. There are two corridors of higher density residential and commercial development along the major east-west routes, following Sunset Boulevard and NE 3rd/4th Streets. The hills descending from the plateau, Interstate 405 and limited street connections isolate this area for pedestrians and cyclists. The City should focus on maximizing the use of the extensive community investment in park land and facilities in this area. Some of the older parks in the Highlands need design updates and new features which could better serve this area’s population. The renovation of Kiwanis Park is one such improvement. In addition, while this Community Planning Area has the best overall coverage of parks (minimal gaps in service), some parks do not meet size recommendations and/or the ½ mile service area access distance. Linking the park system to institutional partners, including the Renton School District, Renton Technical College and King County Libraries may enhance access to programs and decrease facility gaps in the system. Completion of Sunset Neighborhood Park and the Meadow Crest Accessible Playground are excellent examples of how updates, new features and institutional partners can enhance Renton’s parks. HIGHLANDS Projects • Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center • Honey Creek Greenway • Sunset Neighborhood Park • North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center • Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 • Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 • Glencoe Park • Kiwanis Park • Heritage Park • Windsor Hills Park RESOLUTION NO. 4398 106 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE RECOMMENDATIONS Maximize Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center: Located geographically at the center of the Highlands Planning Area 1 , this site serves as the only community park for most of east Renton. Additional land to the south has been added to the site which has yet to be integrated into the overall design. The park also shares a property line with Highlands Elementary School. Increasing density also increases demand on park sites. To better serve this community, the City should begin a long-term process of planning and designing a completely reconfigured Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center as shown on the concept plan in Chapter 7. This site should retain current park amenities but reconfigure them to accommodate a larger, multi-generational indoor facility with additional features to include a learning garden and a skateboarding area. The reconfigured park should also maintain the designated Safe Routes to School. North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center: Renovate or redevelop the park and neighborhood center to better meet community needs 2 . Implement Sunset Planned Action EIS: The City should continue to implement the adopted Sunset Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement. This project is a collaborative redevelopment involving Housing Authority property, a new library and Sunset Neighborhood Park 3 . The first phase of the park is complete and the second, final, phase is scheduled to be completed in 2020. Programming and maintenance of the new park should recognize the anticipated high level of use and the relationship to the other features of the redevelopment plan, especially the library. Other improvements tied to the redevelopment include integrated stormwater management approaches that will include non-motorized connections to the site. Add New Park Sites: The Highlands Community Planning Area is well served by parks within ½ mile of residents. However, two areas remain underserved. The first gap, a new proposed Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 4 , should be north of Sunset Boulevard and west of Duvall. This area has a neighborhood park (Glencoe Park) which does not meet acreage recommendations to serve this area; when locating Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 these two sites should be considered together to provide service in this area. A second proposed park, Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 5 , would serve the residential area in the southern most portion of the Community RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 107 RECOMMENDATIONS Planning Area. This park would serve the higher density residential area. Expand and Develop Windsor Hills Park: 6 Property surrounding this site should be monitored for acquisition opportunities to expand the park to the minimum 2-acre guideline, open up park access, and increase visibility and functionality. Ultimately this park should be developed using the concept plan (Chapter 7) for guidance. New features include a fenced dog park with agility area, natural play features and hillside slides. NE 4th St Puget Dr SEUnion Ave NELake Wa sh ing ton B lvd NHoquiam Ave NEMay Creek Greenway MaplewoodGolf CourseCedar RiverNatural Area PhilipArnold Park Tiany Park May CreekGreenway KennydaleLions Park N.A.R.COProperty Honey Dew School Lindbergh High School Cascade Elementary School Sierra Heights Elementary School John Mcknight Jr High School Renton Technical College Tiany Park Elementary School Highlands Elem School Maple Heights Elementary School Early Childhood Learning Center Hazen High School CedarRiver Park RiverviewPark Talbot HillReservoir Park Sit InPark GlencoePark ParkwoodSouth Park BENSON PLANNING AREA Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # Highlands Planning Area 1 2 3 4 5 6 KiwanisPark HeritagePark Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center WindsorHills Park Honey CreekGreenway North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center Sunset NeighborhoodPark Meadow CrestAccessible Playground May Creek Park KenyonDobson Property RESOLUTION NO. 4398 108 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 109 RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIPTION The northern most tip of Renton, the Kennydale Community Planning Area includes Kennydale neighborhoods on both the east and west sides of Interstate 405. This area includes two developed parks and portions of the May Creek Greenway, where the City developed the first soft-surface trail along the creek. The Renton School District has one elementary school in the area. The majority of this area is low density residential, with mixed use commercial and residential property at the far north edge. Connections across Interstate 405 are limited. The May Creek Greenway also isolates a pocket of housing near the Newcastle border. The area encompasses substantial natural areas but does not necessarily provide access. The City of Renton, in partnership with King County and the City of Newcastle, has been acquiring property along the greenway since 1990 in order to make a trail and greenway connection from Lake Washington to Cougar Mountain Regional Wildland Park. RECOMMENDATIONS Expand Access to the May Creek Greenway: Acquisitions by Renton and King County in the Kennydale Community Planning Area have resulted in a nearly continuous swath of greenway across Renton’s northern border and acquiring the missing links is essential. Coordination with the City of Newcastle and King County (bridge May Creek in Renton over to Newcastle) is also recommended. Approximately fifty percent of the May Creek Greenway in Kennydale is owned by King County. The City should work with King County to create a natural area management plan that includes identifying appropriate access points to the greenway and developing trails that allow for stewardship and recreation in a natural setting. KENNYDALE Projects • May Creek Greenway • Kennydale Beach Park • Kennydale Lions Park • Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 • Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 • Kenyon Dobson Park RESOLUTION NO. 4398 110 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE Enhance Three Existing Park Sites: The two developed parks in the Community Planning Area are key to local identity and community gathering. Kennydale Beach Park is a summertime staple but is severely constrained by neighboring properties and the former railroad, which is now the site of the regional Eastrail. Renton should capitalize on water access and the associated natural areas. The City should monitor adjacent properties for opportunities to purchase land to expand this park. Kennydale Lions Park is an under-developed asset. A full redesign of this site should be completed using community input and the City’s park design guidelines. Chapter 7 includes a concept for this park that provides one idea for the future of this expanded site. Kenyon Dobson Park should be improved with a nature center and trailhead for May Creek Trail, serving as a future connection to the City of Newcastle’s developed May Creek Trail. Provide Two Additional Neighborhood Parks: The City should add park sites to the isolated pockets of this area, although the availability of appropriate land will be a major challenge. On the west side of Interstate 405 in Kennydale, the only developed park is the small Kennydale Beach Park. While a highly valued site, the size and waterfront location of this park limit its use for some types of park activities. If the site cannot be expanded, an additional neighborhood park should be added to this area 1 . A second neighborhood park should also be added east of the freeway and north of the May Creek Greenway 2 .116th Ave NEE Mercer WayPark Ave NLogan Ave NS 3rd St Lake Wa sh ing ton B lvd N ClarkeBeach Park MERCER ISLAND LakeWashington Cedar R iver §¨¦405 Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park KiwanisPark Cedar RiverTrail Park May CreekGreenway Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center Kennydale Lions Park Honey CreekGreenway EarlingtonPark North Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center KennydaleBeach Park Renton High School John Mcknight Jr High School Renton Technical College Highlands Elem School Early Childhood Learning Center Sartori Elementary School Kennydale Elementary School St. Anthony's School Cedar River Park LibertyParkJonesPark Senior ActivityCenter Property Sunset NeighborhoodPark Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # Kennydale Planning Area 1 2 KenyonDobson Property RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 111 RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIPTION The Talbot Community Planning Area is located in southwest Renton extending south from Interstate 405 between SR-167 and SR-515/108th Avenue SE and south to the city limits. The Planning Area includes two developed parks and substantial natural area acreage. In addition, two properties have been acquired for future neighborhood parks in the southern half of the area. Talbot is primarily residential with a commercial corridor connecting the Valley and Benson Community Planning Areas along SW 43rd Street/S Carr Road. This corridor includes Valley Medical Center. A cluster of high density residential property extends south from SW 43rd on either side of 96th Avenue South. Connections within this area and beyond are challenging due to the hills, a disconnected street pattern and freeway barrier to the west. Developing existing park land in the south and the management and maintenance of natural areas should be a focus for the City. The properties acquired for new neighborhood parks have development constraints due to wetlands. There are also opportunities for integrating and interpreting the natural features and historic landscapes and structures. RECOMMENDATIONS Expand/Connect Panther Creek Wetlands: The City has acquired substantial natural area land extending from the intersection of SR 167 and Interstate 405 to just north of the Valley Medical Center campus at SW 43rd Street. The City should continue to expand the protected acreage along Panther Creek and develop trail connections that provide access for enjoyment of nature and stewardship activities. The expansion of this natural area should include a connection via additional acquisitions or easements east to the developed portion of Projects • Panther Creek Wetlands • Edlund Property • Cleveland Richardson Property • Thomas Teasdale Park • Talbot Hill Reservoir Park • Springbrook Watershed • Lake Street Open Space • Panther Creek/Edlund Property TALBOT RESOLUTION NO. 4398 112 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE the Edlund Property and west to the Springbrook Wetland Mitigation Bank 1 . Lake Street Open Space, a small undeveloped property, should be utilized as a future trailhead. Design and Develop Undeveloped Park Sites: The two undeveloped neighborhood park sites (Edlund Property and Cleveland Richardson Property) should be master planned and designed to integrate the natural and historic elements as well as features that support gatherings, recreation and fitness 2 3 . Following the completion of the master planning process, these sites should be developed as soon as funding can be identified. Both sites have the potential to serve large residential areas that are currently outside of a 10 minute walk to a park. Chapter 7 includes concept designs that provide ideas for the future of these two sites. Access to each site should be maximized by creating trail connections to the neighboring residential areas and to nearby parks and natural areas. Partner to Foster Health and Wellness: In partnership with Valley Medical Center there could be increased opportunities to develop healthy lifestyle programming for residents, employers/ employees and visitors that utilize both City facilities and the medical center campus. Valley Medical will also have access to a future trail connecting to the Panther Creek Wetlands 4 and the Edlund property. A partnership between the City and Valley Medical Center could be pursued to develop a trailhead. Strategic Reinvestment in Existing Parks: Two additional parks, Thomas Teasdale Park and Talbot Hill Reservoir Park 5 are located close together in the north portion of Talbot. As reinvestment is required, these two sites should be planned together to differentiate the opportunities provided and maximize the use of the available park land.Talbot Rd SSW 27th St SE 168th St SE Petrovitsky Rd SW Grady Way Puget Dr SEBenson D r S SW 41st St SW 7th StMetroWaterwork Park ST716 SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands EdlundProperty RentonWetlands Cleveland Richardson Property Panther CreekWetlands PhilipArnold Park ThomasTeasdale Park SpringbrookTrail Fred Nelsen Middle School Benson Hill Elementary School Talbot Hill Elementary School New Horizon School St. Anthony's School Talbot HillReservoir Park ParkwoodSouth Park SE 186th PlaceProperties Lake StreetOpen Space 1 1 2 3 4 5 Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # Talbot Planning Area RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 113 RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIPTION The Valley Community Planning Area makes up the west edge of Renton in the lowlands immediately east of the Green River. The area is a contrast of light industrial, commercial and office park development against preserved and restored wetlands and green spaces. In addition to the two Renton owned sites, King County owns the Waterworks Garden site incorporated in the regional waste water treatment plant. With excellent access and a history of office park and other industrial and commercial uses, this area is focused on employment. A new Kaiser Permanente health campus is a major employer in this area with a particular interest in community health. Park and recreation services in this area should focus on facilities that are useful to employees, attractive to employers and add to natural systems and green infrastructure. RECOMMENDATIONS Provide Improved Access and Interpret the Black River Riparian Forest: As a unique site that provides habitat and floodwater control, the Black River Riparian Forest 1 has a multi-layered story for visitors, in addition to being a beautiful and calm place within an urban environment. Renton should formalize public access to this site, including trails and an interpretive facility. A boardwalk section of trail should be considered in site master planning. It will be important to balance the access and level of habitat and wildlife protection necessary for this specific site, see concept plan in Chapter 7. Create an Environmental Education Hub: The combination of unique natural areas, local and regional trail routes and the King County Waterworks Garden creates a destination for environmental education within Renton. The City should develop interpretive elements at key VALLEY Projects • Black River Riparian Forest • Environmental Education Programs • Renton Wetlands RESOLUTION NO. 4398 114 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE sites and acquire missing segments via easement or fee simple acquisition along the Springbrook Trail corridor and at the Renton Wetlands 2 . The City could also contribute to developing curriculum for visiting school and tour groups to explain the importance of these natural areas as habitat and a part of the City’s green infrastructure. Add Trails and Seating Areas: The City should continue to build trail connections within and connecting to the Valley as well as continue partnering with King County and South King County cities to complete the Lake to Sound Trail 3 . The Black River segment of this regional trail under construction in 2019, along with projects funded by the renewed King County Parks Levy, will one day complete a continuous paved pathway from Lake Washington (in Renton) to the Puget Sound (in Des Moines). This trail will connect five cities and multiple existing regional trails, including the Springbrook Trail, the Cedar River Trail, the Green River Trail and the Interurban Trail. Trails in this Community Planning Area would increase access to healthy activity to the area’s employment base. Convenient trails in attractive settings, such as the existing boardwalk in the Renton Wetlands, provide walking opportunities for stress relief and fitness, while regional trails, bike lanes and freeway pedestrian connections create active transportation options for commuters. Seating areas along trail corridors and adjacent to natural areas, should be designed to accommodate outdoor eating and informal gathering.Talbot Rd SSW 27th St S 133rd St SW Grady Way Logan Ave NSW 41st St S 3rd St SW 7th St W Valley HwyFort DentCounty Park SkywayPark MetroWaterwork Park Bryn Mawr Cedar R iver §¨¦405 ST716 RentonMunicipalAirport Black RiverRiparian Forest Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands Panther CreekWetlands Cedar RiverTrail Park SpringbrookTrail EarlingtonPark SpringbrookTrail Renton High School Talbot Hill Elementary School New Horizon School St. Anthony's School BurnettLinear Park Lake StreetOpen Space Piazza & Gateway Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # Valley Planning Area 1 2 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 115 RECOMMENDATIONS Projects • Earlington Park • West Hills Neighborhood Park DESCRIPTION The West Hill Community Planning Area is located to the west of the Renton airport and north of Martin Luther King Jr. Way/SW Sunset Boulevard. The majority of the Planning Area is currently outside of the city limits. The City of Renton owns one neighborhood park in West Hill and there are also two King County owned park properties (one developed park and one natural area site) located in the potential annexation area. Renton School District extends through West Hill and five school sites are located in this planning area. With only a small portion of the Community Planning Area within the current City limits, the primary focus is serving that area. RECOMMENDATIONS Provide One New Neighborhood Park: Within the current city limits, one additional neighborhood park should be located in West Hill 1 . The hills and barriers (such as the airport) make it difficult for residents to access parks within or outside of the Community Planning Area on foot or by bicycle. Acquire Waterfront Areas: If the Lake Washington waterfront is annexed, the City should carefully monitor opportunities to acquire additional waterfront property for habitat improvement and water access 2 . Plan for Annexation Areas: If the City expands into the potential annexation area, additional park sites will need to be located. Skyway Park, currently owned by King County, will be an important resource. Partnership opportunities with the Renton School District could increase access to recreation whether annexation occurs now or in the future.Park Ave NS 133rd St NE 4th St R e n t o n A v e S Logan Ave NS 3rd St Union Ave NE87th Ave SLake Wa sh ing ton B lvd N Fort DentCounty Park SkywayPark LakeridgePark Bryn Mawr LakeWashington Cedar R iver RentonMunicipalAirport Black RiverRiparian Forest Gene CoulonMemorial Beach Park Cedar RiverTrail Park Highlands Park andNeighborhood Center WindsorHills Park EarlingtonPark Sunset NeighborhoodPark Meadow CrestAccessible Playground Honey Dew School Renton High School John Mcknight Jr High School Renton Technical College Albert Talley High School Bryn Mawr Elementary School Lakeridge Elementary School Campbell Hill Elementary School Rainier Hill Elementary School Dimmit Middle School Highlands Elem School Early Childhood Learning Center Sartori Elementary School Hazen High School St. Anthony's School CedarRiver Park LibertyPark RiverviewPark JonesPark Senior ActivityCenter Property Sit InPark GlencoePark BurnettLinear Park TonkinPark Piazza & Gateway Sunset NeighborhoodPark Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # West Hill Planning Area 1 2 WEST HILL RESOLUTION NO. 4398 116 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER FIVE Talbot Rd SSW 27th St SE 168th St SE Petrovitsky Rd 124th Ave SE116th Ave SEPuget Dr SEBenson D r S SW 41st St W Valley HwyLake Youngs Watershed Soos Creek Parkand Trail Petrovitsky ParkSoos Creek Park and Trail RentonPark Soos CreekPark and Trail McGarvey Park Open Space Lake YoungsCounty Park Cavanaugh PondNatural Area Ricardi ReachNatural Area BoulevardLane Park KENT §¨¦405 §¨¦5 ST716 Ron RegisPark SpringbrookWatershed Panther CreekWetlands RentonWetlands EdlundProperty RentonWetlands CascadePark Cleveland /Richardson Property Panther CreekWetlands TianyPark ThomasTeasdale Park SpringbrookTrail Lindbergh High School Fairwood Elementary School Ridgewood Elementary School Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary School Carriage Crest Elementary School Meeker Middle School Fred Nelsen Middle School Cascade Elementary School Benson Hill Elementary School Renton Park Elementary Talbot Hill Elementary School Tiany Park Elementary School New Horizon School ParkwoodSouth Park SE 186th PlaceProperties Lake StreetOpen Space Talbot HillReservoir Park Parks Provided by Others Regional Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Linkage Park Recommendation Location Natural Area Trail Corridor Special Use Future Park # Fairwood Planning Area DESCRIPTION The Fairwood Community Planning Area is located east of the current city limits, south of State Route 169, and borders the Lake Youngs Watershed on three sides. This Potential Annexation Area, if annexed, would become the south east corner of Renton. This area is largely developed with single family homes and contains a commercial center, with higher density multi-family housing centered at SE Petrovitsky Road and 140th Avenue SE. The City of Renton owns no parks in this Community Planning Area, but King County owns and manages the large sports field-focused Petrovitsky Park at Parkside Way and Petrovitsky Road. RECOMMENDATIONS Note: This entire area is outside of the city limits, no projects are planned pending any future annexation. Plan for Annexation Areas: If the City expands into the potential annexation area, additional park sites will need to be located, including neighborhood parks and a community park. As with other areas in the City, partnerships with the Renton and Kent School Districts will be important to providing park and recreation services to this area. Connections: The majority of the connections within this Community Planning Area will be on-street bike routes and sidewalks. Future planning for this area should take advantage of the existing trail on Petrovitsky Road and large publicly owned natural areas along Soos Creek and Lake Youngs with associated trails. FAIRWOOD Projects • No projects identified RESOLUTION NO. 4398 6 IMPLEMENTATION RESOLUTION NO. 4398 118 | CITY OF RENTON IMPLEMENTATION Implementing this Plan advances the community-wide vision and guides long- term decision making. The critical balance is to provide enough direction to create action toward the community’s vision while retaining a high degree of flexibility to adapt to opportunities created by development and redevelopment, changes in priorities, new partnerships and the availability of outside resources. DECISION MAKING TOOLS The goals of this Plan offer direction for long-term change in the park system. The objectives provide additional clarity by describing the outcomes of these changes. Clear connection to the goals and objectives ensures that future development will be consistent with the desires of the community. The decision making tools further the community wide vision, goals and objectives by providing guidance for the provision of parks and recreation services and programming, the design of new parks and renovations, the prioritization of projects and the cost of building and maintaining improvements. This section explains these tools and how they can be applied to Renton’s future projects and opportunities. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 119 Design Guidelines This Plan recommends design guidelines for the park classification system and updates and expands the descriptions of what should, what could and what should not be included in the design and development of each park type. This tool also informs decision making about size and locations for future parks. ORGANIZATION The guidelines are organized by park classification. For each park classification, there are five design guidelines topics: • Size and Access: The size of a park, and particularly the developable area, determines the type of park and uses possible at the site. Access addresses the frontages, preferred modes of transportation and entrances to the site. • Recommended Resources: There is a minimum set of park resources needed for a park location to meet the objectives developed from community input and analyzed in the Community Needs Assessment. Items listed in this sub-heading are intended to be the minimum elements for the given park classification. • Additional Potential Resources: The park resources identified in this sub-heading are additional resources for consideration. If site size allows, other resources can be incorporated into the park as long as the impacts of the resource do not exceed the capacity of the size and scale of the intended park site classification. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 120 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX • Structures: If a structure is identified for the park site, additional review and standards will come into play. This section also calls out which non-recreation structures need additional consideration before being located within park sites. • Incompatible Resources: In some cases, there are park resources that conflict with the purpose and character of a particular park classification. The basic guidelines, by park category are provided below, the remaining guideline topics are detailed in Appendix B: Decision Making Tools. NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Intent: Provide close-to-home recreation opportunities for nearby residents, who typically live within walking and bicycling distance (.25-.5 miles) of the park in a residential setting. Size and Access: • Minimum developable park size 2 acres. • Property faces front facades of adjacent development. • Access from local street or trail. COMMUNITY PARK Intent: Provide opportunities for active recreation and organized play in a location that can accommodate increased traffic and demand, while also serving the neighborhood park function for nearby residents. Size and Access: • Minimum developable park size 10 acres. • Access from a higher order public street on at least one side for main park entry. • Main park entry should front a street with transit or bicycle route when applicable. • Secondary access to the park from a public local access street or trail preferred. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 121 IMPLEMENTATION REGIONAL PARKS Intent: Provide destination park locations that can accommodate communitywide and regional demand, while also fulfilling the function of a community and neighborhood park for nearby residents. Size and Access: • Minimum developable park size 50 acres. • Access from a higher order public street on at least one side for main park entry. • Park may have multiple main entries which should front a street with a transit or bicycle route when possible. • Secondary access points to the park from a public local access street or trail is encouraged. SPECIAL USE PARKS Intent: Provide space for unique features or places that create variety in the park system but cannot be accommodated within other park sites due to size or location requirements. Size and Access: • Size depends on the type of use proposed. • Access from a higher order public street on at least one side for main park entry. • Main park entry should front a street with a transit or bicycle route when applicable. • Access may be limited during certain times of the day or to specific recreation activities. NATURAL AREAS Intent: Provide opportunities for users to interact with local nature or protect natural resources and systems within the standards of the existing natural resource regulatory environment. Size and Access: • Size of the natural area is variable, depending primarily on the extent of the natural resource being protected. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 122 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX • Access is dependent on size of property and type of natural area. Generally, natural areas should have at least one identified entrance accessible from a public street. • Public access may be limited or excluded if the natural resource is deemed too fragile for interaction. However, maintenance access should be provided via trail or service road. CORRIDOR Intent: Narrow swaths of land that serve as connections between parks or to other destinations. Lands can include public land, private partnerships and/or easements. A corridor site can be the location of a trail or can provide a habitat linkage between two larger areas. Size and Access: • Size is dependent on corridor length and right-of-way or easement width and connectivity. Natural Area Evaluation Tool This tool utilizes a systematic approach to prioritizing and managing natural areas, beginning with inventories and moving into stabilization, at which point the natural area is no longer deteriorating, and then improvement, and gradually, restoration. The inventory feeds a decision-making process guided by prioritization criteria to help the City decide which natural areas to focus on first. See Appendix B for more information. MAINTAINRESTOREIMPROVESTABILIZE Figure 6.1: Natural Area Management Continuum Increasing Habitat Quality RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 123 IMPLEMENTATION Prioritization Criteria The wide range of projects, from new STEM programs to a new play feature to natural area enhancement, require criteria to evaluate how a specific program or project relates to the Plan vision. Drawing from the extensive public input, the project team developed and refined seven criteria to apply to parks, recreation programming and natural area projects: • Advance programming objectives: Project or program supports recreation programming key outcomes. • Provide multiple planning objectives: Project or program is aligned with other adopted planning efforts of the City of Renton, King County or other aligned jurisdictions. • Fill identified gaps in service: Project or program adds park sites, recreation facilities, natural areas or recreation programs to identified underserved populations or areas of the city. • Enhance partnerships or volunteerism: Project or program creates new partnerships or strengthens existing partnerships. • Enhance (or improves use of) existing facilities: Project or program makes the best possible use of the existing investments in land and facilities. • Contribute to system sustainability: Project or program contributes to the long-term environmental and financial sustainability of the system. • Strengthen identity: Project or program celebrates the unique features of Renton’s neighborhoods or the city as a whole. Scoring a project against these criteria allows for the sorting of disparate projects into an ordered list that focuses community resources. As part of the planning process, the consultant team scored each project against each criterion, on a scale of 0-5. This preliminary list was then reviewed by staff, the public, commissions and the City Council’s Committee of the Whole. The list was finalized once all public feedback was received as part of the SEPA environmental review process. This ranking should be considered a snapshot view of priorities. As time passes, this list should not be considered fixed. The factors that feed into prioritizing based on these criteria are subject to change and should be reconsidered periodically. Additionally, while RESOLUTION NO. 4398 124 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX this ranking can be used to look at all projects in the system, it can also be broken down to examine the ranking by park type, Community Planning Area or by specific types of improvements. Please see Appendix B for the full descriptions of each of the Prioritization Criteria. Capital and Operations Cost Model The Prioritization Criteria intentionally avoids making decisions based on cost. However, the cost of improvements at a park (and at the system-wide level) is an important consideration as the Plan moves from this decision making stage into implementation planning. Critical cost considerations include both one-time capital costs and on-going operations and maintenance costs. The Capital and Operations Cost Model allows broad “planning level” costs to be identified based on the recommended improvements. These costs are based on a series of assumptions based on recent park construction and operations experience of the project team as well as past project and operating costs in Renton. Six major project categories are identified in the model, along with a number of specific facilities, each of which has specific capital or operating cost implications. For each park in the system, the recommended projects and individual facilities are selected and added to the total project cost based on a per-unit or per-acre cost assumption specific to the type of park. The result is a total capital cost by park location, which can be rolled up to a park type, Community Planning Area or system-wide total. One additional function added to the model is an inflation factor that illustrates the capital cost projected 5, 10 and 20 years into the future, illustrating the value of completing projects sooner rather than later. Operating cost modeling includes the resources needed to maintain, staff and program park sites and facilities. These costs are driven by the size of a park site and the presence of key facilities, such as restrooms, sport fields and buildings. Operating costs are calculated for the existing park system as well as the facilities recommended to be added to the system. The final total (including both existing and proposed) removes the duplication of facilities that would be replaced by a recommended improvement, to avoid double counting. The model is both a snapshot of the total costs based on the recommended improvements, and a live spreadsheet model that SIX CAPITAL PROJECT TYPES: • Planning and Design • Acquisition • Development • Renovation • Stewardship Projects • Major Maintenance and Reinvestment RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 125 IMPLEMENTATION allows staff to change the assumptions about cost and specific facilities to adjust for changes over time. This flexibility allows the City to model different packages of projects that result in more, less or simply different investments in the park system. The totals reported from this tool are based on all the recommendations in the Plan and are summarized following the Capital Projects List. CAPITAL PROJECTS LIST Table 6.1 presents a ranked list of all capital improvements recommended in the Plan. The Capital Projects List ranking utilizes the prioritization criteria and process described in Appendix B to apply public priorities to the wide range of potential projects. This scoring was based on community demand and needs, achieving the vision of this Plan and was completed prior to the development of project costs and funding options, which are applied later. The list includes the project title, defining the specific site or type of improvement; a project description summarizing the full extent of the project over the 20-year Plan vision; and the total score out of 35 possible points, with a higher score meaning a higher priority. Where projects have the same score, they are sorted in alphabetical order within the list position (for example, all projects scoring 27 points are in list position number four but there is no implied preference for Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center as it falls alphabetically before May Creek Park). Use of this List The Capital Projects List as presented on the following pages should be considered a snapshot of prioritization based on 2019 conditions. As a 20-year plan, the implementation of these projects will be spread out over many years and this ranking will help to focus City efforts. Breaking down this list by timeframe, the top ten list positions (which include 24 projects) are the focus of the first six- years of Plan implementation. The projects following position 10 will be considered long-term efforts but should be considered even in the short-term if special opportunities arise. This list is intended to be used as a dynamic tool. The total ranking will always need to be considered against practical realities and be reevaluated periodically to account for changing circumstances and conditions. In addition, the list can be filtered and sorted to identify priority order based on park category or Community Planning Area, as shown in Appendix C. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 126 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX Table 6.1: Ranked Project List PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 1 N.A.R.CO Property Develop according to design guidelines and Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan to include artificial turf soccer fields, relocated trail, parking, picnic facilities, play area, restrooms, bike park/bmx/ pump track and climbing wall. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 33 2 Cedar River Park Existing major building facilities include RCC and Carco Theatre. Enclose lap pool at Henry Moses Aquatic Center, potential field reconfiguration. Redevelop elements as shown on the revised Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Also included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 29 3 May Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor, install soft surface trail, trailhead(s), creek crossings and partner with Newcastle and King County. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. 28 4 Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Existing property is inefficient as configured. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 27 4 May Creek Park Develop park according to design guidelines (parking, picnic, play area, hard surface court, open turf area, restrooms, trail connections) using concept plan as a reference, create/implement management plan addressing wetlands. Potential acquisition to increase park usability. 27 4 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Construct the planned waterfront trail and park area, connecting the end of the existing water walk at the Cedar River Boathouse to the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. 27 5 Black River Riparian Forest Develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, complete site inventory/management plan, implement management plan. Location of Lake to Sound Trail constructed and maintained by King County (shown as regional trail connection on the concept plan). Site is in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Management Plan and the Black River Water Quality Management Plan. 26 The Capital Projects List, and the prioritization tool that informed it, is intended to feed into the City’s Capital Improvement Plan process. Through the City’s CIP process, funding sources, amounts and phasing will be identified for the public’s priority projects as the next step towards implementation. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 127 IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 5 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Maintain and enhance facility for non-motorized boating, acquire land for additional parking, expand technology, renovate S. beach restrooms & bathhouse. Replace parking lots, irrigation, swim beach promenade and rosewall/bulkhead. High level of ongoing reinvestment due to intensive use. Planned park bond improvements include multiple major replacement projects. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 5 Liberty Park Re-develop according to design standards and the Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan. Improve ballfields in the short term (for example levelling). Repurpose Community Building for environmental learning. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 5 Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site Re-master plan for future park development. Redevelopment of the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big 5 lot should include a plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend beyond the existing park, creating a civic center. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. 26 5 Ron Regis Park Improve existing and undeveloped fields (with natural turf); extend water service to the park; add a permanent restroom, playground, and picnic area(s). Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Potential for habitat improvements to stabilize shoreline. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 6 Cedar River Natural Area Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, Cedar River Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 25 6 Cleveland Richardson Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement management plan. 25 6 North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Re-master plan park and redevelop neighborhood building for multi-generational use. Potential for partnerships. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 25 6 Tiffany Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Expand to connect to Cascade Park. Potentially repurpose and expand neighborhood building for environmental learning as shown on concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 25 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 128 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 7 Edlund Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement management plan addressing wetland. Continue acquistions to make connection to the Panther Creek Wetland. 24 7 Kenyon Dobson Park Develop interpretive/education center, trailhead, parking, restrooms.24 8 Burnett Linear Park* Included in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center Plan. Improvements identify expanding park to the north (Renton Connector). Reconfigure existing parking lot between 4th and 5th. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 23 8 Honey Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Develop soft surface trail. Located in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 23 8 Trail Expansion & Development Trail connection projects from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan that are connected to parks and natural areas.23 9 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park A new park with lakefront access as noted in the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS dated 10/21/03.22 9 Sports Complex Acquire, plan and develop a 4 field (or more) sports complex to centralize competitive play.22 10 Cedar River Trail Park Invasive species removal, add utilities for Cedar River Boathouse. Included in City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Planned connection to future Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 21 10 Panther Creek/Edlund Property Included in Edlund Property concept plan. Develop a management plan. Acquire land and easements as needed to connect to the Panther Creek Wetlands. 21 11 Panther Creek Wetlands Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor. Create pedestrian trails and boardwalk system. Managed by Surface Water Utility. 20 11 Philip Arnold Park Potential partnership with neighboring landowner (currently Puget Sound Energy) to enhance usability and access. Improve ballfield and multipurpose field. Renovate or remove neighborhood building and restrooms. Included in the City Center Plan. Planned park bond improvements include: relocate playground, improve ADA accessibility, refurbish picnic areas, refurbish basketball court surround, refurbish parking lot, add lighting and a loop trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 20 11 Senior Activity Center Property Potentially expand for multi-generational center. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 20 Table 6.1: Ranked Project List (continued) RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 129 IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 11 Corridor Acquisition Acquire or secure new properties providing important linkages between parks and natural areas. Included in the City Center Plan and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. 20 11 Trailheads and Parking Identify and develop appropriate access points to natural areas.20 12 City Center Neighborhood Park 1 Develop neighborhood park amenities at existing Senior Activity Center site after phasing out existing maintenance buildings, which will require acquisition of a new site. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 19 12 Jones Park Shoreline stabilization. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Adjacent trail corridor adds enough size to serve as a full neighborhood park. Park in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and Cedar River Basin Plan. 19 12 Kiwanis Park Potential acquisition to expand park to increase usability. Bond improvements include: improving field and installing ADA access from Union Avenue, renovating or removing neighborhood building, replacing playground and renovating hard surface courts and parking, and adding picnic plaza. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 19 12 Sunset Neighborhood Park Final phase contruction to be completed in 2020. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 12 Thomas Teasdale Park Improve outfield drainage. Potential re-purpose of neighborhood building. Renovate existing ballfield to create all-abilities ballfield. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 19 13 Renton Wetlands Continue to manage as required by Mitigation Banking Agreements. Portion managed by Surface Water Utility. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Plan. 18 14 East Plateau Community Park Acquire site from King County and re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 17 14 Kennydale Lions Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Park acreage is not fully developed and current configuration of facilities limits usage. Renovate existing neighborhood building. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 17 14 Non-motorized Boating Facility Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for a non- motorized boating facility. Enhance existing non-motorized boating facility. 17 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 130 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 15 Parkwood South Div #3 Park* Acquire adjacent land to bring this site up to minimum size of 2 acres of developable land; master plan and develop a neighborhood park according to design guidelines. 16 15 Community Gardens Acquire land and/or develop additional community gardens through partnerships, potentially as part of new neighborhood or community parks. 16 16 Cascade Park Renovate according to design guildelines using the concept plan as a reference. Expand park to connect Cascade Park to Tiffany Park, improve road access and increase visibility. Potential for off leash area within park. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 15 16 Earlington Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15 16 Kennydale Beach Park* Reconfigure dock for improved life guarding, renovate restroom/ lifeguard facility. Acquire land to enhance usability. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 15 16 Wayfinding and Informational Signage Design and implement wayfinding and park signage throughout the parks, recreation and natural areas system and install information kiosks and trailhead signage at key points in the trail system. 15 17 Maplewood Golf Course Continue to maintain and operate, acquire property as it becomes available. See adopted Master Plan, included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital and operations costs are outside of the Community Services budget, within an enterprise fund. Capital Improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 17 SE 186th Place Properties* Undersized and surrounded by private property; potential for community garden, tree nursery or play area to serve local residents. If not used for neighborhood park functions, replace with an additional park east of SR 515. 14 17 "Soos Creek Greenway: Boulevard Lane" A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This neighborhood park may be transferred to the City and renovated. This park includes a substantial natural area. 14 17 Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Renovate site with features that differentiate it from nearby Thomas Teasedale Park. Potentially add loop walk and picnic area. Refurbish tennis and pickleball courts. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 17 Windsor Hills Park Potential acquisitions to enhance park usability and visibility from street. Redevelop according to design guideline and concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 Table 6.1: Ranked Project List (continued) RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 131 IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 17 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park east of S Benson Rd and north of SE Puget Drive.14 17 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park west of SR 515 around SE 192nd Street.14 18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall.13 18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of SE 128th Street.13 18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of Sunset Boulevard, west of Duvall.13 18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of NE 3rd Street.13 18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park west of I-405.13 18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park east of I-405 and north of the May Creek Greenway.13 18 West Hills Neighborhood Park Acquire and develop one neighborhood park north of Renton Avenue.13 18 Cedar River Trail Corridor Secure ownership of remaining railbanked corridor land between the trestle bridge and Ron Regis Park, also the remaining corridor near I-405, include acquired land in the surrounding parks and natural areas; maintain corridor as a regional trail linkage. 13 18 Community Garden/ Greenhouse Continue to maintain and operate, expand garden. Potential to be larger neighborhood Park - Planning and acquisition included in City Center Neighborhood Park 1. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 13 18 Dog Parks Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for off-leash areas in four neighborhood or community parks or other locations.13 19 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This property may be transferred to the City once Soos Creek Trail is complete. 12 20 Riverview Park Park in Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 11 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 132 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 21 Lake Street Open Space Potential trailhead. Acquire easements as neccesary to connect to Panther Creek Wetlands.10 21 Tonkin Park Redevelop per Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. 10 22 Skate Parks Develop new skate park within a community park.9 23 Maplewood Park Renovate or remove restrooms. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.8 23 Veterans Memorial Park Tile refurbishment. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan.8 24 Glencoe Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 24 Heritage Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 24 Maplewood Roadside Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 7 25 Springbrook Watershed Managed by Water Utility, not accessible to the public. Capital and operations costs are outside of Community Services budget.6 26 Sit In Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. Included in Downtown Civic Core.3 Summary of Capital Costs Each new or existing project park site has a set of recommended projects and may include specific facilities recommendations. The details of these recommendations are provided in Appendix C along with the capital costs per project. The total amount of capital investment identified in the cost model is $333,092,000. Table 6.2 on the following page breaks this total down by major project type and additional facilities with percentages of the total cost. Table 6.1: Ranked Project List (continued) * Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines. ** Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 133 IMPLEMENTATION Table 6.2: Capital Cost Summary - Total Costs for All Projects Broken Down by Category MAJOR PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST % OF TOTAL COST Planning and Design $13,800,000 4% Acquisition $41,319,000 12% Development $84,951,000 26% Renovation $16,851,000 5% Stewardship Projects $3,402,000 1% Major Maintenance and Reinvestment $28,861,000 9% SUBTOTAL: CAPITAL PROJECT TYPES $189,184,000 57% Additional Facilities and Permitting - Total Costs for All Projects in Each Category Play Area - Small $8,750,000 3% Play Area - Large $3,000,000 1% Picnic Shelter - Small $4,375,000 1% Picnic Shelter - Large $1,500,000 0% Multi-Purpose Trails (Miles) $25,700,000 8% Soft-Surface Trails (Miles) $510,000 0% Multi Purpose Sport Field $8,500,000 3% Sport Field with Artificial Turf/Lights $24,000,000 7% Sport Courts $2,475,000 1% Restroom $15,000,000 5% New Building $6,000,000 2% Other Major Capital $42,480,000 13% Environmental and Permitting Costs $1,610,000 0% SUBTOTAL: ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AND PERMITTING $143,900,000 43% TOTAL CAPITAL COST $333,092,000 100% Note: See Appendix C for details. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 134 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX INFLATION OF COSTS The projected inflation of the total capital cost is based on a 5% annual inflation factor. Over the long-term, the costs of the recommended investment in the park system will increase greatly. Table 6.3, below, shows the projected cost for five, ten and twenty years in the future. In twenty years, the cost of developing the improvements recommended here would more than double. Appendix C includes further breakdown of these numbers by project. Summary of Operations Costs Operations costs are modeled on a per acre basic maintenance cost that is based on Renton’s actual costs of providing maintenance, equipment, supplies and support services. In addition, facilities that require additional maintenance or staffing such as sports fields, include operating cost allocations on a per unit (bonus) basis. For recreation buildings, staffing, facilities support and utility costs are included. Special facilities, such as the Henry Moses Aquatic Center and recreation staffing at swimming beaches and the Henry Moses Aquatic Center were added to the total as Other Operations costs. Table 6.3: Inflation Projections TOTAL CAPITAL COST 2019 $333,092,000 TOTAL CAPITAL COST PROJECTION 5 YEARS $446,372,000 TOTAL CAPITAL COST PROJECTION 10 YEARS $542,574,000 TOTAL CAPITAL COST PROJECTION 20 YEARS $883,796,000 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 135 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM PROJECTS LIST In addition to the capital projects, a series of program areas were identified for exploration and growth. These program projects have been separated from the capital projects due to the different funding needs and implementation process. These projects are not an exhaustive list of ongoing Renton recreation programs, but rather areas that received special interest from the community and should be a focus of development. It is important to note that recreation programming and park and recreation facilities are closely tied together. As facilities are developed or redeveloped, new or additional programs should be evaluated to maximize their use. The program recommendations do not have associated costs, as the scale of programming and the cost recovery goals are yet to be developed. These details will be clarified as the Recreation and Neighborhoods Strategic and Operational Plan and Cost Recovery Model are completed. Table 6.4: Operating Cost Summary - Totals for Each Category OPERATING TYPE EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) Basic Maintenance $3,862,909 $2,531,931 $6,394,800 Bonus: Sports Fields $400,000 $625,000 $1,025,000 Bonus: Restrooms $945,000 $735,000 $1,680,000 Bonus: Picnic Shelter $60,000 $125,000 $185,000 Staffing: Building $6,675,000 $1,800,000 $8,475,000 Other Operations $2,113,000 $1,010,000 $3,123,000 Total Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) $14,056,300 $6,827,100 $20,883,400 Note: Operating costs adjusted to avoid double counting replaced facilities; the difference between individual lines and totals is acocunted for in rounding error. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 136 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX Table 6.5: Program Project List PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 1 Environmental Education Expand hands-on environmental programs that focus on the natural resources found in the Renton park system and cultural history.32 1 Recreation and Neighborhoods Strategic Plan and Cost Recovery Model Develop detailed Recreation and Neighborhoods Strategic and Operational Plan as an operational guide to implement this plan and the City Business Plan.32 2 Neighborhood Program Build community in neighborhoods by supporting neighborhood group identified events and projects; residents contribute hours to enhance and restore their neighborhoods. 31 3 Aquatics and Water Access Maximize use of existing facilities to meet demand for year-round pool access. Provide the physical and programmatic framework to facilitate community members accessing Lake Washington and the Cedar River independently or through programming. 29 4 Renton School District Partnership Share resources and indoor and outdoor spaces. Partnering to provide programming beyond what the city and school district can provide independently of one another (i.e. STEM). Data sharing to be sure programming objectives are achieved and responsive to community needs. 28 4 STEM Programming Expand programming to meet community demand for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math educational opportunities, in partnership with the school district and technical college to meet a key community need. 28 5 Athletics Maxmize use of existing facilities through partnerships and shared use and maintenance; year-round facilities and playable fields to keep pace with demand.27 6 Arts Place-based community art, for all ages and abilities, building community through arts-based learning and play with a focus on history and culture in partnership with the Arts Commission. Includes arts based events, community art projects, and opportunities to integrate art into neighborhoods, community events and facilities. 26 Note: Programming and Facilities are reciprocal; as new facilities are constructed new programming should be developed. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 137 IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES There are several strategies that can move the community vision forward. Two of the most critical paths to success are ensuring that new development contributes a fair share to park system improvements and pursuing a strategy to build community support for future initiatives. Park related projects that combine with other public services such as transportation and stormwater, may be able to utilize alternative sources of funding and maximize community benefits. Additionally, leveraging recreation programming as a community building strategy can extend additional support for the City’s offerings: • Development/Redevelopment Partnerships: Efforts to build the envisioned park system will require substantial financial investment. While tax payers will ultimately share in some of these costs, private development should be responsible for contributing toward the related increased impacts on the parks and recreation system. The City should rely on a system of regulations and rewards that ensure new development and redevelopment pays a portion of public improvements. Feedback about recreation elements and access as well as education about the financial benefits to developer projects (especially increased property values) can increase the overall contribution individual projects make to the system. • Building Community Support: All new mechanisms to fund public improvements will require the will of voters. It will be important to employ public input, education, outreach and polling before any specific funding mechanism is attempted. • Integrating Parks, Natural Areas and Infrastructure: Combining the community benefits of infrastructure Eighty-five percent of respondents to the 2017 NRPA Americans’ Engagement with Parks Survey seek high-quality park and recreation amenities when they are choosing a place to live. Higher home values not only benefit the owners of these properties but also add to the tax base of local governments. Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Park Service. Parks, Trails, and Health Workbook. Washington, DC: National Park Service; 2015. PRIORITY #PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL SCORE 6 Adaptive Recreation Provide programming for youth and adults with adaptive emotional, physical and sensory needs.26 7 Outdoor Recreation Providing physical and programmatic framework to facilitate community members to engage with the parks system independently or through programming. 22 Note: Programming and Facilities are reciprocal; as new facilities are constructed new programming should be developed. Table 6.5: Program Project List (continued) RESOLUTION NO. 4398 138 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX investment with the recreational benefits of park land has considerable potential to enhance the use of natural systems in Renton as well as meeting the Plan goals. The desired result of this integration is reducing the amount of land reserved for the exclusive use of infrastructure and maximizing recreational value. In an environment of limited public resources (including land and operating funding) the City and the community should explore integrating compatible infrastructure into parks and using infrastructure land for park and natural area purposes. The design guidelines provided in Appendix B include considerations for both infrastructure additions to park and natural area sites and the addition of park and natural features to infrastructure sites. One of the opportunities presented by combining sites and functions is the potential for stormwater fees to help fund enhancements that provide multiple benefits and natural area management. • Recreation Program Positioning: The Recreation Division has built an extensive set of program offerings and developed an informative guide to both City operated and partner programs. Renton should continue to build on this to ensure that the Let’s Go Renton brochure is the “go to” guide for all events occurring in Renton. One of the things that Renton can offer to potential programming partners is the opportunity for inexpensive exposure. Each major program area should be discussed as an investment in the community, directly related to the City’s goals. Parks, recreation programming, trails and natural areas provide opportunities for physical activity resulting in the long term investment in public health. • Building School District Partnership: The City has a long working relationship with the Renton School District that has allowed City recreation and community organizations to use indoor and outdoor facilities. The City has a unique opportunity to revisit the structure of the existing partnership. Potential changes could enhance the public’s access to sport fields, indoor spaces, gyms and classrooms. For Meadow Crest Accessible Playground, 25% of total project costs were derived from Community Contributions. Significant funding partners included Rotary Club of Renton, First Financial Northwest Foundation, Renton Community Foundation, Seattle Seahawks, King County, Renton Housing Authority, Renton Technical College, Lions Club, Kiwanis Club, Soroptimist and multiple personal donations. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 139 IMPLEMENTATION FUNDING STRATEGIES Current and Recent Funding Sources GENERAL FUND This is the City’s primary source for operating revenue. Most of this revenue comes from taxes levied on property, the sale of merchandise and utilities within the City’s boundary. Fees collected through the park and recreation system, such as recreation program fees, boat launch fees, picnic shelter or other facilities rental fees, are also returned to the general fund. These revenues are generally thought to return to the Community Services budget. In practice the revenue number is a point of justification of the annual budget and has no direct connection to the level of funding. REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (REET) Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) is a tax on all real estate sales and is levied against the full value of the property. The City is allowed under the statutes to levy 0.5% in addition to the State of Washington tax. These funds can only be used for projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City projects approximately $4 million per year in REET revenues. These funds are used for general obligation debt, parks and facilities capital improvements. The portion of the total that goes to park or facilities projects depends on the specific eligible projects. PARK IMPACT FEES Park Impact Fees are fees imposed on new development to pay for capital projects required to accommodate the impacts of development on the City’s infrastructure. Renton’s existing (2019-20) park impact fee is $3,945 for single family and $2,676 – $3,203 for multi-family developments (depending on the number of units). A rate study to re-evaluate the impact fee level is recommended. LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS Also known as councilmanic bonds, these bonds are paid directly out of the general fund and require no additional taxation. Therefore, no authorizing vote is necessary, however the City must have the ability to repay the bonds prior to bond issuance. These bonds may be used RESOLUTION NO. 4398 140 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX for any purpose (not only capital). In 2018, the Council authorized $14.5 million in councilmanic bonds to fund up to 43 major park improvement projects across the system. RECENT GRANT SOURCES The City of Renton has had success competing for grant funding from a wide range of programs. Recent grants received by the City of Renton were funded by: • King County Conservation District; • King County Conservation Futures; • King County Youth and Amateur Sports Grant; • Washington Department of Natural Resources; • Land and Water Conservation Fund; • Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program; • Community Development Block Grant (CDBG); • King County Best Starts for Kids; and • King County Veterans, Seniors and Human Services Levy Grant. OTHER RECENT FUNDING SOURCES • The Riverview Bridge and Sunset Neighborhood Park projects received direct legislative appropriations of nearly $6 million in total, recognizing the alignment with State priorities. • Charles L. Custer/Renton Park Department Memorial Fund: The City’s park system benefits from an estate gift managed by the Renton Community Foundation, which funds small enhancements to the park system. • George S. Ikuta Memorial Fund: The Renton Senior Activity Center benefits from an estate gift managed by the Renton Community Foundation, which funds programs for seniors at the Renton Activity Senior Center. • Sam Chastain Scholarship Fund: This fund provides recreational scholarships to low income youth and families who live within the city limits of Renton, or in the Renton School District boundaries. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 141 IMPLEMENTATION Other Funding Options There are a number of additional options Renton could consider for funding parks, recreation and natural area improvements. The list below represents both capital and operations funding sources. KING COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION, TRAILS, AND OPEN SPACE LEVY In August of 2019, King County voters approved Proposition 1, funding operations and maintenance of existing parks and trails, access to recreation, regional trail development, open space acquisition and aquatic facilities. Twenty-four percent of the funding raised will be distributed among cities in King County to fund any local park and recreation purpose. A total of $810 million in funding under this levy will be collected and spent between 2020 and 2025. Four grant programs will be established by King County in addition to annual direct appropriations. Renton’s 6-year appropriation will be approximately $1,944,000. UNLIMITED GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND These are voter-approved bonds paid off by an assessment placed on real property. The money may only be used for capital improvements. This property tax is levied for a specified period of time (usually 15-20 years) and passage requires a 60% approval. Major disadvantages of this funding option are the voter approval requirement and the interest costs. CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION This is a lease-purchase approach where the City sells Certificates of Participation (COPs) to a lending institution. The City then pays the loan off from revenue produced by the facility or from its general operating budget. The lending institution holds title to the property until the COPs are repaid. This procedure does not require a vote of the public. REVENUE BONDS These bonds are sold to investors and are paid back from the revenue generated from the facility operation. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 142 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX METROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT A special tax district, authorized under RCW 35.61.210; a board of park commissioners could take over part or all of park ownership and operations. If the boundaries of the district match the city limits, the City Council can serve as the commissioners. Metropolitan Park Districts are funded by a levy, with the total rate allowed up to $0.75/1000 of property value. Metropolitan Park Districts are a junior taxing district, meaning they are among the first to have cuts (called prorationing) if taxes go above the $5.90 levy rate limit or the 1% growth limit. PARK AND RECREATION SERVICE AREA A type of special tax district that can levy regular property tax up to $0.60/1,000 property value. Authorized under RCW36.68.400.620, when voter approved by special levy. A PRSA is typically used for facilities that serve an unincorporated area. DONATIONS The donation of labor, land or cash by service agencies, private groups or individuals is a popular way to raise small amounts of money for specific projects. One common example is a service club, such as Kiwanis, Lions or Rotary, funding playground improvements. EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY If the City has an excess parcel of land with some development value, it could be surplussed for private land more suitable for park use. JOINT PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP This concept has become increasingly popular for park and recreation agencies. The basic approach is for a public agency to enter into a working agreement with a private corporation to help fund, build and/or operate a public facility. Generally, the three primary incentives a public agency can offer are land to place a facility (usually a park or other parcel of public land), certain tax advantages, and access to the facility. While the public agency may have to give up certain responsibilities or control of other recreation services and amenities, it is one way of obtaining public facilities at a lower cost. ESTATE GIVING A variety of arrangements to accept donations for park and recreation as an element of an estate. One example of this would be a Lifetime Estate: an agreement between the City and a land owner, RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 143 IMPLEMENTATION where the City acquires the property but gives the owner the right to live on the site after the property transfer in exchange for the estate maintaining the property or for other agreed upon services. PARTNERSHIPS The City could consider developing partnerships with other jurisdictions, agencies or non-profit service providers to implement projects identified in the Plan. Some potential partners include the YMCA, Boys and Girls Club, private sport groups, neighborhood organizations, the County, school districts and neighboring city governments. PRIVATE LAND TRUSTS Private land trusts, such as the Trust for Public Land, Inc. and the Nature Conservancy will acquire and hold land for eventual acquisition by a public agency. In some cases repayment of acquisition funds, including interest, may be required. SHARED FACILITIES In some situations other services provided in the city, or in private utilities, may be able to share the cost of improvements that would benefit the parks, recreation and natural areas system. One example is utility corridors; in many cases land used for sanitary sewer, water or power lines may make an excellent trail corridor, such as the City’s Honey Creek Trail. In this situation, the utility may pay to develop a service road that can also serve as a trail. Grant Programs Following the City’s own resources, the largest funding source for park and recreation projects are grants from the State of Washington Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO). The RCO is responsible for administering a wide variety of public funds and provides technical assistance and policy development in addition to preparing statewide plans on trails, boating facilities, habitat preservation and off-road vehicles. This section outlines the major RCO programs as well as several other relevant granting agencies. It is important to note that most grant programs require a portion of the project cost to be provided by a local partner as match funding. In most cases granting agencies will not fund more than 75 percent of a project’s cost. These programs also require training, tracking and other staff attention throughout the year to maximize success. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 144 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX BOATING FACILITIES PROGRAM (BFP) This grant program is funded by boaters’ gasoline taxes and administered by the RCO. Projects eligible under this program include acquisition, development, planning and renovation projects associated with launching ramps, transient moorage and upland support facilities. RCO allocates up to $200,000 for planning projects and up to $1,000,000 for acquisition, development or projects that combine planning with acquisition or development. Grants are distributed on an annual basis and require a minimum of 25 percent matching funds by a local agency. LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND (LWCF) This is a federal grant program that receives its money from offshore oil and gas drilling. The money is distributed through the National Park Service and is administered locally by the RCO. In 2014, Congress established the LWCF Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership program, which provides grants to acquire or develop public lands for outdoor recreation in areas with 50,000 or more people, or in areas with too few parks and significant populations of people who are poor, young, or minorities. The funds can be used for acquisition and development or renovation of outdoor recreation areas and require a 50 percent match. Local agencies must have at least 10 percent of the total project cost come from a non-state, non- federal contribution. WASHINGTON WILDLIFE AND RECREATION PROGRAM (WWRP) This program is administered by the RCO and supports the acquisition of valuable recreation and habitat lands for preservation and the development of recreation areas for growing populations. Projects eligible under this program include acquisition and development of parks, water access sites, trails, critical wildlife habitat, natural areas and urban wildlife habitat. Applicants must provide a minimum of a 50 percent non-RCO match. Local park projects have maximum requests of $500,000 for development and $1 million for acquisition costs. There are no maximum request levels in the following categories: urban wildlife habitat, critical habitat, natural areas, trails, riparian protection and water access. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 145 IMPLEMENTATION YOUTH ATHLETIC FACILITIES (YAF) The Youth Athletic Facilities is a grant program designed to provide funding for new, improved and better maintained outdoor athletic facilities that focus on serving youth through the age of 18 but can serve all ages. The program is administered by the RCO and applicants must provide matching funds of at least 50 percent. An additional 10 percent of the total project cost must be from a non-state, non-federal contribution. The grant amounts vary from $25,000 to a maximum of $350,000. NO CHILD LEFT INSIDE This program provides grant funds for outdoor environmental, ecological, agricultural, or other natural resource-based education and recreation programs serving youth. The grant program is divided into three tiers, with Tier 1 providing a minimum of $5,000 and Tier 3 providing a maximum of $150,000. Tier 2 and 3 projects have a match requirement of 25 percent. AQUATIC LAND ENHANCEMENT ACCOUNT (ALEA) This program is administered by the RCO and supports the purchase, improvement or protection of and access to aquatic lands for public purposes. Applicants must provide a minimum of a 50 percent match. Grant amounts range from $500,000 for restoration and development projects to $1 million for acquisition projects. SALMON RECOVERY FUNDING BOARD (SRFB) Salmon recovery grants are awarded by the Salmon Recovery Funding Board, from state and federal sources, to protect and restore salmon habitat. The board funds projects that protect existing, high quality habitats for salmon and that restore degraded habitat to increase overall habitat health and biological productivity. The board also awards grants for feasibility assessments to determine future projects and for other salmon related activities. Projects may include the actual habitat used by salmon and the land and water that support ecosystem functions and processes important to salmon. The program funds acquisition, restoration, design and non-capital projects with no project funding limit. Local agencies are required to match 15 percent of grant funds except for design-only projects. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 146 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX ESTUARY AND SALMON RESTORATION PROGRAM (ESRP) This program provides grants to protect and restore the Puget Sound near-shore habitat. The program was created by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to support emerging priorities of the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Program. Program priorities steer funding towards projects focused on restoring physical ecological processes. All phases of project development from feasibility to implementation are eligible for funding. A match of 30 percent of the total project cost is required. There is no grant cap for this program. BOATING INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAM (BIG) The Boating Infrastructure Grant Program provides funding to develop and renovate boating facilities targeting recreational boats 26 feet and larger. Grants also may be used for boater education. This program is funded by the Aquatic Resources Trust Fund and administered by the RCO. The local agency match requirement is 25 percent and projects are split into two categories: projects under $192,086 and projects over $200,001 (not to exceed $1,440,645 per project). COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS (CDBG) These grants from the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development are available for a wide variety of projects. Most are used for projects in lower income areas of the community because of funding rules. Grants can cover up to 100 percent of project costs. FIXING AMERICA’S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT OF 2015 The FAST act funds surface transportation across the country using a combination of federal funding, primarily the gas tax. One of the funding programs is a block grant to states that includes set- aside funding for Transportation Alternatives. This funding can be applied to a variety of smaller-scale transportation projects such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, community improvements such as historic preservation and vegetation management, and environmental RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 147 IMPLEMENTATION mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity. The Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) administers the Transportation Alternatives funding through the Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO). The Puget Sound Regional Council is Renton’s RTPO. RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP) The Recreational Trails Program, part of the FAST Act and administered by RCO, provides funds to rehabilitate and maintain recreational trails and facilities. These grants support a backcountry experience, which means that the trail’s physical setting, not its distance from a city or road, should be predominately natural. For example, a backcountry trail can provide views of cities or towns. Backcountry also means that the user will experience nature as opposed to seeing or hearing evidence of human development and activity. This grant program provides for trail-related facilities for both non-motorized and motorized trail uses. Under limited circumstances, new “linking” trails, relocations, and education proposals are also eligible. This program requires a 20 percent match and grants top out at $150,000 for general projects and $20,000 for educational projects. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) USFWS may provide technical assistance and administer funding for projects related to water quality improvement through debris and habitat/vegetation management, watershed management and stream bank erosion, and sediment deposition projects. PRIVATE GRANTS AND FOUNDATIONS Private corporations and foundations provide money for a wide range of projects, targeted to the organizations’ mission. Some foundations do not provide grants to governments but will often grant to partner organizations. Private grants can be difficult to secure because of the open competition and the up-front investment in research and relationship building. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 148 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SIX KING COUNTY CONSERVATION FUTURES GRANTS The Conservations Futures Tax (CFT) funds the purchase of open space lands such as natural areas, urban green spaces, passive parks, regional trails, farms, and forests. CFT project sites can be used for low-impact passive recreational activities, including hiking, walking, open play, riding bikes or horses on dispersed trails, picnicking, and gardening. King County’s Conservation Futures program is guided by open space priorities in local community plans. The grants require 50% of the project funding to come from other sources. MONITORING, REVIEWING AND UPDATING The vision, goals and objectives of this Plan should serve this community to the end of this decade and beyond. However, it will be important to check in with the community and validate or adjust the plan for any major shifts in priorities or project opportunities. The six-year period defined by the Recreation and Conservation Office presents a good time for this check in. The implementation of this Plan will continue well past the six- year update cycle mandated by the state. Following the adoption of this Plan, the staff and the Parks Commission could develop a work plan. This work plan should recognize that there are factors that may limit the ability to move forward on any one project but each high priority site could have recommendation elements that can be moved forward. This work plan can be revisited biannually, ahead of the budgeting process, to reevaluate progress and priorities (making use of the prioritization criteria and other decision making tools) and adjust for new opportunities. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 7 CONCEPT PLANS RESOLUTION NO. 4398 150 | CITY OF RENTON As a part of the planning process, the consulting team created a series of concept plans to illustrate some of the recommended types of facilities and how these facilities can fit into existing and proposed parks. These concepts were created as one vision of how these parks can be designed, and utilized community input from the parks, recreation and natural areas planning process. The Draft Concept Plans were available for review and comment by the staff, public, the project Steering Committee, Parks Commission, Planning Commission and the Council Committee of the Whole. While the concepts were well received as presented, the recommendations for each of these park locations include developing a formal park master plan. The park master plan process provides the opportunity for more detailed discussion with the community to learn about their ideas and desires for future park development, as well as discuss opportunities and constraints the site may have. These concept plans create a starting point for these discussions. CONCEPT PLANS RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 151 The selected sites for the concept plans provide a range of park types, sizes and settings to give a broad view of possibilities. There is at least one concept plan for each Community Planning Area with the exceptions of Fairwood, which is outside Renton city limits, and West Hill, which is largely outside of the Renton city limits. The concepts are illustrated over an air photo of the existing site. The concept plans include: • Black River Riparian Forest • Cleveland Richardson Property • East Plateau Community Park • Edlund Property • Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center • Kennydale Lions Park • May Creek Park • Riverside: Tri-Park (Cedar River Park, Liberty Park, N.A.R.CO Property) • Tiffany Park/Cascade Park Connection • Windsor Hills Park RESOLUTION NO. 4398 152 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN BN INC RDACCESS RDWY ACCESS RDPOWELL AVE SWS 13 5 T H S T NACHES AVE SW81ST AVE S80TH AVE SSW 3R D P L SW 4 T H P L OAKSDALE AVE S W BN INC RD ACCESS RD ACCESS RD BN INC RD ACCESS RD POWELL AVE SWMONSTER RD SW68TH AVE SSW 7TH ST SR 9 0 0 MO N S T E R R D S W OAKESDALE AVE SW6: Black River Riparian Forest Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 500 feet 0 500 1,000250 Feet LEGEND Park Limit Line Regional Trail Connection Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving Paved Trail/Sidewalk Picnic Area Seating Area Overlook/Viewing Area Kiosk Informational and/or Interpretive Signage Boardwalk Tail Bridge Point of Interest Entry/Gateway N i i i i k k k i i Lake to Sound Regional Trail ExistingSpringbrook Trail Boardwalk Through Wetland Area With Interpretive Signage & Overlook King County WaterworksGarden RestoredHabitat Area Adjacent to InterpretiveCenter Entry Gateway Lake to Sound Regional Trail Connection SmallInterpretive/EducationalCenter with 12-15 space parking lot 1. BLACK RIVER RIPARIAN FOREST CONCEPT PLAN N 0 250 500 1000 FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 153 CONCEPT PLANS BN INC RDACCESS RDWY ACCESS RDPOWELL AVE SWS 13 5 T H S T NACHES AVE SW81ST AVE S80TH AVE SSW 3 R D P L SW 4 T H P L OAKSDALE AVE S W BN INC R D ACCESS RD ACCESS RD BN INC RD ACCESS RD POWELL AVE SWMONSTER RD SW68TH AVE SSW 7TH ST SR 9 0 0 MO N S T E R R D S W OAKESDALE AVE SW6: Black River Riparian Forest Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 500 feet 0 500 1,000250 Feet LEGEND Park Limit Line Regional Trail Connection Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving Paved Trail/Sidewalk Picnic Area Seating Area Overlook/Viewing Area Kiosk Informational and/or Interpretive Signage Boardwalk Tail Bridge Point of Interest Entry/Gateway N i i i i k k k i i Lake to Sound Regional Trail ExistingSpringbrook Trail Boardwalk Through Wetland Area With Interpretive Signage & Overlook King County WaterworksGarden RestoredHabitat Area Adjacent to InterpretiveCenter Entry Gateway Lake to Sound Regional Trail Connection SmallInterpretive/EducationalCenter with 12-15 space parking lot RESOLUTION NO. 4398 154 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN 7: Cleveland Richardson Property Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 300 feet 0 300 600150 Feet Non-Programmed Multi-Use Sport Fields (230’x 360’) Play Area Observation Deck & Overlook Meadow Picnic Group Picnic Area Existing House Parking Lot (25 Spaces) Event Lawn Pond LEGEND Park Limit Line Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving Picnic Area Play Area (with areas for 2-5 yrs and 5-12 yrs) Bridge Deck at Pond Edge Creek N 2. CLEVELAND RICHARDSON PROPERTY CONCEPT PLAN N 0 150 300 600 FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 155 CONCEPT PLANS 7: Cleveland Richardson Property Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 300 feet 0 300 600150 Feet Non-Programmed Multi-Use Sport Fields (230’x 360’) Play Area Observation Deck & Overlook Meadow Picnic Group Picnic Area Existing House Parking Lot (25 Spaces) Event Lawn Pond LEGEND Park Limit Line Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving Picnic Area Play Area (with areas for 2-5 yrs and 5-12 yrs) Bridge Deck at Pond Edge Creek N RESOLUTION NO. 4398 156 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN MaplewoodHeightsElementary SE 138TH PL SE 2ND ST 152ND AVE SESE 136TH ST SE 2ND CT 147TH PL SESE 139TH PL 149TH PL SE146TH AVE SE145TH AVE SEILWACO PL SENE 1ST PLSE 1 4 1 S T S T SE 140TH PL143RD AVE SE148TH PL SESE 140TH ST 150TH PL SEHOQUIAM PL SEORCAS AVE NESE 1ST PL SE 136 LN NE 1ST ST PRIVATE RD SHADOW AVE NE146TH PL SESE 137TH PL SE 133RD CT 153RD PL SEROSARIO AVE SESE 2ND PL ROSARIO PL SESE 1ST ST SE 141ST PL 144TH AVE SESHADOW PL SEQUINCY PL SEORCAS PL NE SE 138TH ST SE 139TH CTSE 139TH PL 143RD AVE SE146TH AVE SESE 136TH ST SE 2ND ST NE 1ST PL143RD AVE SENE 1ST PL SE 140TH PL SE 2ND CT 148TH PL SESE 142ND ST144TH AVE SESE 1 4 1 S T S T 8: New Community Park - East Renton Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 350 feet 0 350 700175 FeetEEEEPPH PLH P H SE 136TH STSE 136TH EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKing County Cedar to SammamishTrail Natural Park Area With Trails & Seating Areas Open Turf Area Small Picnic Area Practice Field (230’x360’) [2] Group Picnic Pavilions Parking Lot (70 Spaces) BaseballField PedestrianConnection Restroom Baseball Field Tot Play Area School Age Play Area [2] Basketball Courts SeatingArea PedestrianEntry PedestrianEntry, Typical Meadow LEGEND Park Limit Line Trail Connection Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving Group Picnic Pavilions Picnic Area Seating Area School Age Play Area (5-12yrs) Tot Play Area (2-5 yrs.) N 3. EAST PLATEAU COMMUNITY PARK CONCEPT PLAN N 0 175 350 700 FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 157 CONCEPT PLANS MaplewoodHeightsElementary SE 138TH PL SE 2ND ST 152ND AVE SESE 136TH ST SE 2ND CT 147TH PL SESE 139TH PL 149TH PL SE146TH AVE SE145TH AVE SEILWACO PL SENE 1ST PLSE 1 4 1 S T S T SE 140TH PL143RD AVE SE148TH PL SESE 140TH ST 150TH PL SEHOQUIAM PL SEORCAS AVE NESE 1ST PL SE 136 LN NE 1ST ST PRIVATE RD SHADOW AVE NE146TH PL SESE 137TH PL SE 133RD CT 153RD PL SEROSARIO AVE SESE 2ND PL ROSARIO PL SESE 1ST ST SE 141ST PL 144TH AVE SESHADOW PL SEQUINCY PL SEORCAS PL NE SE 138TH ST SE 139TH CTSE 139TH PL 143RD AVE SE146TH AVE SESE 136TH ST SE 2ND ST NE 1ST PL143RD AVE SENE 1ST PL SE 140TH PL SE 2ND CT 148TH PL SESE 142ND ST144TH AVE SESE 1 4 1 S T S T 8: New Community Park - East Renton Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 350 feet 0 350 700175 FeetEEEEPPH PLH P H SE 136TH STSE 1 3 6 T H EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKing County Cedar to SammamishTrail Natural Park Area With Trails & Seating Areas Open Turf Area Small Picnic Area Practice Field (230’x360’) [2] Group Picnic Pavilions Parking Lot (70 Spaces) BaseballField PedestrianConnection Restroom Baseball Field Tot Play Area School Age Play Area [2] Basketball Courts SeatingArea PedestrianEntry PedestrianEntry, Typical Meadow LEGEND Park Limit Line Trail Connection Pedestrian Paths - Soft/Natural Paving Group Picnic Pavilions Picnic Area Seating Area School Age Play Area (5-12yrs) Tot Play Area (2-5 yrs.) N RESOLUTION NO. 4398 158 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN S 38TH CT 103RD AVE SES 37TH PL MILL AVE SE98TH AVE S PRIVATE RD S 178TH S T96TH AVE S S 177TH ST SMITHERS AVE SBURNETT CT S97TH AVE SMORRIS AVE SSMITHERS AVE SSE CARR RD S CARR R D 4: Edlund Property Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 200 feet 0 200 400100 Feet School Age Play Area Net Climbing Course PicnicPavilions Restroom/Kiosk Garden & Patio PedestrianVehicular & Trail Entry & Connections Existing Barn (Future use to be determined) Tot Play Area Seating/Picnic Area Future Connection to Panther Creek Wetland Drop-off Entry Turf Turf Parking Lot(15 Spaces) Meadow Area or Restore Wetland Restore Covered Bridge LEGEND Park Limit Line Pedestrian Paths Trail Vehicular Circulation Group Picnic Pavilion Picnic Area Seating Area Perimeter/Buffer Planting Shaded Seating/Arbor School Age Play Area (5-12) Tot Play Area (2-5) Pedestrian Bridge Creek N 4. EDLUND PROPERTY CONCEPT PLAN N 0 100 200 400 FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 159 CONCEPT PLANS S 38TH CT 103RD AVE SES 37TH PL MILL AVE SE98TH AVE S PRIVATE RD S 178TH S T96TH AVE S S 177TH STSMITHERS AVE SBURNETT CT S97TH AVE SMORRIS AVE SSMITHERS AVE SSE CARR RD S CARR RD 4: Edlund Property Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 200 feet 0 200 400100 Feet School Age Play Area Net Climbing Course PicnicPavilions Restroom/Kiosk Garden & Patio PedestrianVehicular & Trail Entry & Connections Existing Barn (Future use to be determined) Tot Play Area Seating/Picnic Area Future Connection to Panther Creek Wetland Drop-off Entry Turf Turf Parking Lot(15 Spaces) Meadow Area or Restore Wetland Restore Covered Bridge LEGEND Park Limit Line Pedestrian Paths Trail Vehicular Circulation Group Picnic Pavilion Picnic Area Seating Area Perimeter/Buffer Planting Shaded Seating/Arbor School Age Play Area (5-12) Tot Play Area (2-5) Pedestrian Bridge Creek N RESOLUTION NO. 4398 160 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN NE 9TH ST DAYTON AVE NEHARRINGTON AVE NEDAYTON ALY NEEDMONDS ALY NENE 6TH P L NE 8TH ST NE 8TH PLGLENWOOD ALY NEFERNDALE CT NENE 7 T H A L Y GLENWOOD AVE NEFERNDALE CIR NEFERNDALE ALY NEEDMONDS ALY NENE 7TH STEDMONDS AVE NE10: Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 150 feet 0 150 30075 Feet Plaza Area with Benches and Tables SkateArea (14,000sf) Restroom Parking Lot (50 Spaces) CommunityCenter[2] Gyms(31,500 sf) SoftballField [2] Tennis Courts [2] Basketball Courts Improve Field (Drainage) Orchard With Fruit Trees Perimeter Path Group Picnic Area-Common Grills Small Picnic Area Open Turf Area Open Turf HIGHLANDSELEMENTARYSCHOOL CommunityGarden “Outdoor Kitchen”-Prep. Sink-Grill-Tables Tot Play Area (2-5) School Age Play Area (5-12) Practice Field(230’x 360’) LEGEND Park Limit Line Pedestrian Paths Vehicular Circulation Group Picnic Pavilion Picnic Area Seating Area Shaded Seating/Arbor School Age Area (5-12) Tot Play Area (2-5) Community Garden Planting Beds Skate Area N 5. HIGHLANDS PARK AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY CENTER CONCEPT PLAN N 0 75 150 300 FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 161 CONCEPT PLANS NE 9TH ST DAYTON AVE NEHARRINGTON AVE NEDAYTON ALY NEEDMONDS ALY NENE 6TH P L NE 8TH ST NE 8TH PLGLENWOOD ALY NEFERNDALE CT NENE 7 T H A L YGLENWOOD AVE NEFERNDALE CIR NEFERNDALE ALY NEEDMONDS ALY NENE 7TH STEDMONDS AVE NE10: Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 150 feet 0 150 30075 Feet Plaza Area with Benches and Tables SkateArea (14,000sf) Restroom Parking Lot (50 Spaces) CommunityCenter[2] Gyms(31,500 sf) SoftballField [2] Tennis Courts [2] Basketball Courts Improve Field (Drainage) Orchard With Fruit Trees Perimeter Path Group Picnic Area-Common Grills Small Picnic Area Open Turf Area Open Turf HIGHLANDSELEMENTARYSCHOOL CommunityGarden “Outdoor Kitchen”-Prep. Sink-Grill-Tables Tot Play Area (2-5) School Age Play Area (5-12) Practice Field(230’x 360’) LEGEND Park Limit Line Pedestrian Paths Vehicular Circulation Group Picnic Pavilion Picnic Area Seating Area Shaded Seating/Arbor School Age Area (5-12) Tot Play Area (2-5) Community Garden Planting Beds Skate Area N RESOLUTION NO. 4398 162 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN NE 24TH ST NE 26TH PL BLAINE AVE NECAMAS AVE NEMONTEREY AVE NEPRIVATE RDCAMAS AVE NEABERDEEN AVE NENE 27TH ST 2: Kennydale Lions Park Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 125 feet 0 100 20050 Feet Turf Area With Walking Paths Reduce Parking Lot Size to 20 Spaces Picnic Area New Play Area With equipment for ages 2-5 and 5-12 Play Turf Mound Improve Existing Neighborhood Softball Field Informal Rectangular Field Reclocate Basketball Court Eliminate Portion of Parking & Enhance Connection to Park Area to the North Planting Area Tall Fence at Property Line LEGEND Park Limit Line Pedestrian Paths Picnic Area Seating Area Shaded Seating/Arbor Play Area Group Picnic Pavilion With BBQs N 6. KENNDALE LIONS PARK CONCEPT PLAN N 0 50 100 200 FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 163 CONCEPT PLANS NE 24TH ST NE 26TH PL BLAINE AVE NECAMAS AVE NEMONTEREY AVE NEPRIVATE RDCAMAS AVE NEABERDEEN AVE NENE 27TH ST 2: Kennydale Lions Park Concept Plan Data Sources: City of Renton, GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 June 2011 1 inch = 125 feet 0 100 20050 Feet Turf Area With Walking Paths Reduce Parking Lot Size to 20 Spaces Picnic Area New Play Area With equipment for ages 2-5 and 5-12 Play Turf Mound Improve Existing Neighborhood Softball Field Informal Rectangular Field Reclocate Basketball CourtEliminate Portion of Parking & Enhance Connection to Park Area to the North Planting Area Tall Fence at Property Line LEGEND Park Limit Line Pedestrian Paths Picnic Area Seating Area Shaded Seating/Arbor Play Area Group Picnic Pavilion With BBQs N RESOLUTION NO. 4398 164 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN Data Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 7. MAY CREEK PARK CONCEPT PLAN N0100200400 Feet RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 165 CONCEPT PLANSRESOLUTION NO. 4398 166 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN 8. RIVERSIDE: TRI-PARK (CEDAR RIVER PARK, LIBERTY PARK, N.A.R.CO PROPERTY) CONCEPT PLAN N 0 250 500 1000 FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 167 CONCEPT PLANSRESOLUTION NO. 4398 168 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN 9. TIFFANY PARK/CASCADE PARK CONNECTION CONCEPT PLAN Data Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 N 0 200 400 800 Feet RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 169 CONCEPT PLANSRESOLUTION NO. 4398 170 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN 10. WINDSOR HILLS PARK CONCEPT PLAN N 0 50 100 200 FeetData Sources: City of Renton GIS and King County GIS NAD83 HARN State Plane Washington North FIPS 4601 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 171 CONCEPT PLANSRESOLUTION NO. 4398 172 | CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER SEVEN This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 173 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Aspen Institute Project Play. 2019. State of Play Seattle-King County. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Park Service. 2015. Parks, Trails, and Health Workbook. Washington, DC. City of Renton Recreation and Neighborhoods Division. 2019. STREAM Team Outcomes Report. City of Renton Senior Activity Center. 2019. Renton Older Adults Community Needs Assessment. City of Renton. Alex Pietsch, Community and Economic Development. 2009. Community Planning Areas Map. City of Renton. Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources. 2019. Community Services Staffing Summary 1990-2019. City of Renton. 2006. Tri-Park Master Plan (Liberty Park, Cedar River Park & NARCO Site). City of Renton. 2010. Experimental History Project: Renton History Museum Master Plan. City of Renton. Comprehensive Plan: Housing and Human Services Element – 2006-2031 Growth Targets. http://rentonwa.gov/. City of Renton. Comprehensive Plan: Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Element – Policy, Goals & Objectives. http://rentonwa.gov/. City of Renton. January 2019. Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. City of Renton. October 2018. City of Renton 2019-2020 Adopted Budget. City of Renton. Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail-Connecting an Important Regional Trail System. City Parks Alliance. 2018. Active Parks, Healthy Cities: Recommendations from the National Study of Neighborhood Parks. King County agencies. 2008. Communities Count 2008 - Recap of 2009 Data Updates. King County, WA MAKERS Architecture, Planning, Urban Design. 2010. City of Renton City Center Community Plan. MAKERS Architecture, Planning, Urban Design. 2013. City of Renton Benson Hill Community Plan. MIG, Inc. 2018. Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. MITHUN, Inc. 2009. Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy. Renton, WA: City of Renton National Recreation and Park Association. 2018. Economic Impact of Local Parks. Northwest Salmon Discovery Center (Concept Paper) Version 2. April 22, 2010. Paramatrix. June 2009. Lake to Sound Trail-Feasibility Study. Renton, WA: King County, WA Plan-It Geo, LLC. November 2018. Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Report. Renton, WA: City of Renton. Puget Sound Regional Council. 2017. Covered Employment Estimates by Jurisdiction. State of Washington Office of Financial Management, Forecasting and Research Division. April 2019. Population Change and Rank for Cities and Towns, April 1, 2010 to April 1, 2019. Olympia, WA. BibliographyBibliographyRESOLUTION NO. 4398 174 | CITY OF RENTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Trust for Public Land, National Recreation and Parks Association, Urban Land Institute. Accessed September 2019. 10 Minute Walk: Improving Access to Parks and Green Spaces. 10minutewalk.org. U.S. Census Bureau. 2018. American Community Survey 1-Year Estimaes: Renton City, WA. Washington Recreation and Conservation Office. 2015. Economic Benefits of Outdoor Recreation in Washington Factsheet. Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 2016. A Model for Measuring the Benefits of State Parks. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 175 ACKNOWLEDGMENTSGlossary Terms The following definitions are provided for the purposes of the parks, recreation and natural areas system and this plan. • Active Recreation: activities focused on health, competition, skill development or play that center around a recreation facility such as a sports field, court, playground or building. • Passive Recreation: activities that focus on the enjoyment of the environment and center around the built or natural landscape such as open lawns, seating areas that take advantage of views or being surrounded by nature. • Level of Service (LOS) Standard: a ratio of land or facilities based on population, used to track the status of the system as it grows and establish the impact of population growth from development. • Need: a finding based on a quantitative or qualitative analysis. • Demand: a finding based on unique, important or multiple community voices. • Neighborhood Park: close-to-home recreation opportunities for nearby residents, who typically live within walking and bicycling distance (.25-.5 miles) of the park in a residential setting. See Design Guidelines, Appendix B. • Community Park: opportunities for active recreation and organized play in a location that can accommodate increased traffic and demand, while also serving the neighborhood park function for nearby residents. See Design Guidelines, Appendix B. • Regional Park: destination park locations that can accommodate communitywide and regional traffic and demand, while also fulfilling the function of a community and neighborhood park for nearby residents. See Design Guidelines, Appendix B. • Special Use Park: space for unique features or places that create variety in the park system but cannot be accommodated within other park sites due to size or location requirements. See Design Guidelines, Appendix B. • Natural Area: opportunities for users to interact with local nature or protect natural resources and systems within the standards of the existing natural resource regulatory environment. See Design Guidelines, Appendix B. • Corridor: Narrow swath of land that serve as connections between parks or to other destinations. See Design Guidelines, Appendix B. • Grey Infrastructure: The physical framework of the city, commonly thought of as the system of streets, pipes, facilities, bridges, towers and power lines that provide essential services. • Green Infrastructure: Natural systems that perform some of the same essential services such as cleaning water, and retaining stormwater run-off as well as many additional functions such as cleaning the air, cooling our streets and processing and storing carbon that would otherwise contribute to atmospheric warming. Green infrastructure is often thought of in terms of multifunctional green infrastructure, where one piece of land or natural system can provide multiple benefits to the community. Green Infrastructure can exist in natural forms or be engineered for a particular purpose. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 176 | CITY OF RENTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 4398 A PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY APPENDIX RESOLUTION NO. 4398 178 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIx A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 179 APPENDIX A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY Appendix A1 - City Inventory Park Acres Status Diamond Shaped Fields Rectangular Fields Multi‐ Purpose Fields Tennis Courts Basketball Courts Play Eqpt. Open Lawn Trail/ Access Picnic Shelter Swimming Outdoor Restrooms Indoor Restrooms Rentable Space Programmable Space Parking Spaces Parking Area (SF)Misc. Facilities Recreation Center Building Type** Neighborhood Park Burnett Linear Park*1.1 Developed Yes Yes Trail, Plaza Cascade Park 11.1 Developed Yes Yes Trails Cleveland Richardson Property 23.8 Future Park Earlington Park*1.5 Developed 1 Yes Yes Edlund Property 17.7 Future Park Glencoe Park*0.5 Developed Yes Yes Heritage Park 9.2 Developed 1 0.5 Yes Yes 115 3,000 Soft‐surface loop trail and paved loop trail Jones Park 1.1 Developed Yes Yes 1 Trail Kennydale Beach Park***1.3 Developed Yes Beach 1 12 2,700 Kennydale Lions Park 5.5 Developed 1 1 Yes Yes 1 38 26,000 Neighborhood Kenyon Dobson 2.2 Future Park Kiwanis Park 9.0 Developed 1 2 1 Yes Yes 1 53 25,000 Neighborhood Maplewood Park 2.0 Developed 1 1 Yes 1  May Creek Park 16.6 Future Park North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center 2.6 Developed 1 Yes Yes 1 16 12,600 Meadow Crest Accessible Playground: Fully inclusive playground developed in partnership on City and Renton School District Owned property Neighborhood Parkwood South Div #3 Park*0.6 Future Park Philip Arnold Park 11.1 Developed 121YesYes 1 1155 27,000 Neighborhood Riverview Park 12.1 Developed Yes 1132 21,500 Canoe launch, Interpretive trail SE 186th Place Properties*0.6 Future Park Sunset Neighborhood Park 3.2 Developed Yes Yes Yes 1 Fitness, Regional Stormwater Facility, Interpretive Signage, Mist Feature Talbot Hill Reservoir Park 2.6 Developed 3 Yes Portable 14 8,500 Tennis practice board; 3 Pickleball courts Thomas Teasdale Park 9.7 Developed 1 1 Yes Yes 1 1 47 23,000 Neighborhood Tiffany Park 6.7 Developed 1 2 1 Yes Yes 1 33 10,700 Neighborhood Windsor Hills Park 4.6 Developed 0.5 Yes Yes 156.3 0 0 710816164 5 1 9 4 9 6 305 160,000 Community Park Cedar River Park 20.6 Developed 1YesAquatic Center 2 373 150,000 Community Center, Theatre Cedar River Trail Park 15.1 Developed Yes 1 1 127 86,750 Small boat launch, Boathouse Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center 10.8 Developed 1 1 2 2 Yes 1 25 33,000 Safe route to school Neighborhood Liberty Park 10.6 Developed 2 3 1 Yes Yes 12168 50,000 Skatepark, Grandstand Administration Building N.A.R.CO Property 24.0 Future Park Dog Park (Temporary) Ron Regis Park 43.4 Developed 1 1 2 1 Yes Portables 115 50,000 Two Future Park field spaces are currently used, one as a practice field and one as a temporary cricket pitch 124.5 4 1 4543352 1 6 13 2 808369,750 Regional Park Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park*** 51.3 Developed 2 0 Yes Yes 4Beach4 390 275,000 Two restaurants (one with separate restrooms); Eight lane boat launch; boat launch parking ‐ 123 stalls; Day moorage with six finger piers; Waterwalk with two floating picnic pads; Swimming beach with waterwalk; Picnic pavilion; Bathhouse with concession stand, restrooms; Five wooden bridges; Fishing pier with shelter; Canoe launch with wooden float; Sailing club; Two sand volle yball courts; Horseshoe court. 51.3 0 0 0201114 1 4 01 0 390275,000 Special Use Park Community Garden/Greenhouse 0.6 Developed Maplewood Golf Course 192.3 Developed 3 191 70,000 30 stall heated driving range, restaurant, lounge, banquet facility and pro shop Maplewood Roadside Park 1.0 Developed Yes 32 Cedar River Trail access Piazza & Gateway 0.9 Developed Yes Plaza Senior Activity Center Property 2.8 Developed 1 100 26,700 Patio, Fountain Senior Center Sit In Park***0.5 Developed  Tonkin Park 0.2 Developed Yes Bandstand Veterans Memorial Park 0.2 Developed 198.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 4 3 1 323 96,700 Natural Area Black River Riparian Forest 93.3 Natural Area 3 660 Cedar River Natural Area 264.2 Natural Area  Honey Creek Greenway 43.0 Natural Area  Lake Street Open Space 0.3 Natural Area May Creek Greenway 42.0 Natural Area Soft surface loop trail and interpretive signage Panther Creek/Edlund Property 3.7 Natural Area Panther Creek Wetlands 69.0 Natural Area Renton Wetlands 139.2 Natural Area Boardwalk Springbrook Watershed 52.2 Natural Area Tiffany Park / Cascade Park Connection 4.8 Natural Area 711.7 0 0 0000050 0 0 0 0 0 3660 Corridor Cedar River Trail Corridor (City Owned) 1.8 Developed  1.8 0 0 0000010 0 0 00 0 00 TOTAL PARKS AND NATURAL AREAS 1,244.1 4 1 11 17 12 20 23 19 11 3 19 9 16 9 1,829 902,110 * Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines *** Developed Park Area not entirely under fee simple ownership Subtotal Neighborhood Park Subtotal Community Park Subtotal Open Space Park Subtotal Special Use Park Subtotal Corridors Subtotal Regional Park Renton_ParkInventory 111819 Table A.1 - City Inventory RESOLUTION NO. 4398 180 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 CITY OF RENTON | PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 181 Appendix A2 - Schools Site Acreage Diamond Shaped Fields Rectangular Fields Multi‐Use Fields Outdoor Tennis Court Indoor Pool Elementary Schools Benson Hill Elementary 15.1 1 Campbell Hill Elementary 9.0 1 Cascade Elementary 14.9 2 Hazelwood Elementary 15.0 1 Highlands Elementary 6.8 2 Honeydew Elementary 12.4 3 Kennydale Elementary 7.0 1 Maplewood Heights Elementary 8.7 1 Renton Park Elementary 9.6 2 Sartori Elementary 5.3 1 Sierra Heights Elementary 15.4 2 Talbot Hill Elementary 11.2 1 Tiffany Park Elementary 9.7 2 Subtotal Elementary 125.0 201800 Middle Schools Dimmitt Middle School 15.1 1 1 McKnight Middle School 20.2 3 0 4 Nelsen Middle School 21.1 1 1 4 Subtotal Middle Schools 56.4 51540 High Schools Hazen High School 33.8 2** 1** 2** 4 1 Lindbergh High School 37.3 2 1 4 1 Renton High School 25.8 4104 Subtotal High Schools 96.9 6 2 0 12 2 Other Schools/Facilities Renton Academy 10.0 1 Renton Stadium 16.8 1** Meadow Crest Early Learning Center 7.4 H.O.M.E. Program 10.0 0 Renton Ikea Performing Arts Center ND Subtotal Other Schools 44.2 00100 TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS 322.4 13 3 24 16 2 School ** Fields are locked and not accessible to the public; not counted in totals This inventory includes schools within Renton City Limits Renton_ParkInventory 111819 Table A.2 - Schools APPENDIx A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORYRESOLUTION NO. 4398 This page intentionally left blank 182 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIx A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORYRESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 183 APPENDIX A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY Appendix A3- Field Inventory Programmed Park Field Diamond/infieldRectangleComplexMultipurposeAdultYouth AdaptiveYes/NoNatural Turf Synthetic Turf All Ability Surface Bare surface IrrigationOutfield FenceWarning TrackPitching Mound (Elevated)DugoutsBackstopLightingParkingSpectator Seating Equipent StorageField Condition (1‐3) Components Condition (1‐3) Neighborhood Park Heritage Park 1 1 1 No 1 1 1 2 3 Determined when built Kennydale Lions Park 1 rarely 1 Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 Kiwanis Park 111 Yes 1 1 1 1 11 2 2 Maplewood Park 1 1 Minimal 1 1 Benches 1 1 2 2 Restrooms Philip Arnold Park 111 Yes 1 1 1 1111 1 2 Thomas Teasdale Park 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 Tiffany Park 1 1 Minimal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Condition Subtotal Neighborhood Park 0007470 6 7 0 0 0 7001 5 71560 Community Park Cedar River Park 111 Yes 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center 1 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Liberty Park Big Liberty 1 1 1 Yes 1 1111 1 11111 2 2 Grandstand Little Liberty 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 1 11111 1 2 Ron Regis Park Soccer Field 1 11 Yes 1 1 111 2 2 Baseball Field 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 1 1 1 11111 2 2 Multi 1 (Cricket)1 1 Yes 1 Yes‐Pitch 1 11 2 Temporary Cricket Multi 2 1 1 1 Yes 1 1 12 2 Subtotal Community Park 4104870 8 7 1 6221 5 53866 TOTAL ALL PARKS 4 1 0 11 12 14 0 14 14 0 0 1 13 2 2 2 10 12 4 13 12 6 The following indicate the criteria used to evaluate field and component condition: Fields: 1 = poor drainage, uneven surface, frequent wear spots, no base, rough graded 2 = adequate drainage, moderate base, reasonably level playing surface, few wear spots 3 = irrigated, good quality base and surface, well graded and level, minimal wear spots Components: 1 = components due for replacement, limited functionality 2 = components adequate: average quality, may be dated but are still functional 3 = good quality or new components Notes Field Type User Field Surface Field Components Condition If not programmed, or minimally programmed, indicate reason Renton_ParkInventory 111819 A.3 - Field Inventory RESOLUTION NO. 4398 184 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX A: PARK AND FACILITY INVENTORY This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 B DECISION MAKING TOOLS APPENDIX RESOLUTION NO. 4398 186 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B TOOLS FOR DECISION MAKING This appendix introduces four tools used to assist in decision making during the development of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. These tools will also assist in Plan implementation. The tools draw on analysis of the park system guided by the project committees and informed by the community. These tools are developed with the understanding that Renton will have a wide variety of projects to complete to achieve the vision of the Plan. Some projects were identified during the planning process while others will arise during the implementation of the plan. These tools will assist staff, the Parks Commission and elected officials in making the difficult decisions about which projects should move forward first. Four tools are described below. 1. Design Guidelines: This tool updates and expands prior plan descriptions of what should, what could and what should not be included in the development of each park type. This tool also helps to make decisions about the size and location for future parks. Design guidelines deal with the physical features of a park. The management, maintenance and operations of the sites are addressed separately. 2. Natural Area Evaluation Tool: This tool utilizes a systematic approach to prioritizing and managing these areas. The first step is to inventory the City’s natural areas. The approach then recommends moving the natural area into stabilization, at which point the natural area is no longer deteriorating, and then improvement, and gradually, restoration. The inventory process and prioritization criteria included in this tool will help the City decide which natural areas to focus on first for natural area plan development. 3. Prioritization Criteria: The wide range of projects, from natural area enhancement to new STEM programming to a new play feature, require a set of criteria that evaluate how a specific project relates to the plan vision. Scoring a project against these criteria allows for the sorting of disparate projects into an ordered list that focuses community resources. The scoring criteria intentionally avoids the question of funding, focusing instead on the projects that most directly address the vision and leaving funding availability as an over-arching discussion in the implementation portion of the plan. 4. Capital And Operations Cost Model: This tool facilitates cost figure development for the capital and operations of park sites. The costs are based on the existing recreation amenities and additional features in the project list. These recommended projects come from the community’s ideas (as well as previously identified projects) filtered and added to during the Needs Assessment. The discussion of the decision making tools will also help refine this list as ideas are tested and design guidelines are agreed on. To develop a “planning level” idea of the costs associated with these projects a series of assumptions need to be reviewed. The development of this tool begins with identifying the major cost drivers of park development, adding features, maintaining and operating parks in Renton. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 187 DECISION MAKING TOOLS 1. DESIGN GUIDELINES Intent These guidelines provide direction for the development and modification of City of Renton parks. For each of the six park classifications the guidelines describe the purpose of the park type along with the features that are appropriate to that purpose. The City of Renton recognizes that development must comply with local, state and federal regulations that may result in conflicts with the guidelines presented in this document. In such a case, the final design of any facility must comply with the existing regulatory requirements. In addition, some parks and facilities that are currently owned and managed by the City may not meet these design guidelines. Parks and facilities that do not meet these guidelines have been provisionally classified into the closest park category. The intent of the design guidelines is to: • Uphold the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan; • Protect and enhance the City’s quality of life and community identity; • Encourage functional, safe and aesthetically pleasing development while maintaining compatibility with the surrounding environment; and • Ensure the distribution of park facilities and experiences are consistent with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. Organization The guidelines are organized by park classification. For each park classification, there are five design guidelines categories: • Size and Access: The size of a park, and particularly the developable area, determines the type of park and uses possible at the site. Access addresses the frontages, preferred modes of transportation and entrances to the site. • Recommended Resources: There is a minimum set of park resources needed for a park location to meet the objectives developed from community input and analyzed in the Community Needs Chapter. Items listed in this sub-heading are intended to be required elements for the given park classification. • Potential Additional Resources: The park resources identified in this sub-heading are additional resources for consideration. If site size allows, other resources can be incorporated into the park as long as the impacts of the resource do not exceed the capacity of the size and scale of the intended park site classification. • Structures: If a structure is identified for the park site, additional review and standards will come into play. This section also identifies the non-recreation structures that need additional consideration before being located within park sites. • Incompatible Resources: In some cases, there are park resources that conflict with the purpose and character of a particular park classification. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 188 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B Neighborhood Parks INTENT Provide close-to-home recreation opportunities for nearby residents, who typically live within walking and bicycling distance (.25-.5 miles) of the park in a residential setting. Incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) design principles. SIZE AND ACCESS • Minimum developable park size: 2 acres • Property faces front facades of adjacent development • Access from local street or trail RECOMMENDED RESOURCES • Children’s play area • At least one picnic table, one bench and grill • Internal pathway system • Perimeter path or sidewalks • Open turf area • Trees (for shade and to preserve urban canopy cover) • Park identification sign • Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack, etc.) POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES • Youth sport fields • Sport courts • Other small-scale active recreation resources (skate spot, horseshoe pits, etc.) • Natural areas • Water • Court lights • Limited off street parking • Community garden • Shelter, shade structure or gazebo • Pedestrian-scale lighting • Lights • Kiosks • Signage • Public art or historic element COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS • Restroom • Other small building • Buildings and immediate landscaping should follow Low Impact Development practices • Buildings constructed within parks should be built to LEED Silver standard or better INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES • Destination facilities or resources with community wide draw • Sport field lighting • Sport field complexes • Full-service recreation centers • Swimming pools (indoor or outdoor) RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 189 DECISION MAKING TOOLS Community Parks INTENT Provide opportunities for active recreation and organized play in a location that can accommodate increased traffic and demand, while also serving the neighborhood park function for nearby residents. Incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) design principles. SIZE AND ACCESS • Minimum developable park size: 10 acres • Access from a higher order public street on at least one side for main park entry • Main park entry should front a street with transit or bicycle route when applicable • Secondary access to the park from a public local access street or trail preferred RECOMMENDED RESOURCES • Children’s play area, medium to large-scale • Picnic tables, benches and grills • Enclosed or open picnic shelter with grill (capacity of 40-100) • Pathway system connecting internal park facilities • Youth and Adult sports fields (minimum of 2) • Sports court • Permanent restrooms • Off-street parking • Open turf area for sitting and informal play • Trees (for shade and to preserve urban canopy cover) • Park identification sign • Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack, etc.) • Water POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES • Swimming pools/aquatic facilities • Spray park • Sports complex • Community garden • Upgraded utility service to support special events • Water access • Skatepark, BMX park • Flower beds • Off-leash dog area • Natural areas • Public art or historic element • Field, court or pedestrian lights • Trails • Skate spots, bocce court, etc. • Kiosks • Signage COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS • Community building • Special facilities such as a boathouse, theater or interpretive center • Maintenance/storage facilities • Restrooms (preferably integrated into other buildings) • Concession • Buildings and immediate landscaping should follow Low Impact Development practices • Buildings constructed within parks should be built to LEED Silver standard or better INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES • Regional-scale facilities (arboretum, botanical garden, regional sports complex) RESOLUTION NO. 4398 190 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B Regional Parks INTENT Provide destination park locations that can accommodate communitywide and regional traffic and demand, while also fulfilling the function of a community and neighborhood park for nearby residents. Incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) design principles. SIZE AND ACCESS • Minimum developable park size: 50 acres • Access from a higher order public street on at least one side for main park entry • Park may have multiple main entries which should front a street with transit or bicycle route when possible • Secondary access points to the park from a public local access street or trail is encouraged RECOMMENDED RESOURCES • Regional-scale facilities or resources with a regional draw • Children’s play area with unique features themed to reflect site character • Picnic tables, benches, and grills • Multiple enclosed or open picnic shelters with grill (capacity of 40-100) • Pathway system connecting site amenities • Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack, etc.) • Water • Infrastructure to support large community events • Restrooms • Off-street parking • Large open turf area for events, sitting and informal play • Trees (for shade and to preserve urban canopy cover) • Park identification sign • Pedestrian lighting RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 191 DECISION MAKING TOOLS POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES • Swimming pools/aquatic facilities • Spray park • Individual sports fields (baseball, cricket, football, rugby, soccer, softball, multi- purpose) • Regional sports complex • Community garden • Off-leash dog area • Natural areas • Public art or memorials • Field or court lighting • Flower beds • Upgraded utility service to support special events • Stage/amphitheater • Trails • Public art or historic element • Wayfinding and interpretive signage • Specialized sport courts (tennis court, sand volleyball, handball) • Water access (boat ramp, docks) • Kiosks • Signage COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS • Concessions, including restaurants • Rentable event venues • Community Building • Maintenance facilities • Unique or regional scale special facilities such as a regional aquatics center, water sports center or interpretive center • Buildings and immediate landscaping should follow Low Impact Development practices • Buildings constructed within parks should be built to LEED Silver standard or better INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES • No conflicting resources identified RESOLUTION NO. 4398 192 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B Special Use Parks INTENT Provide space for unique features or places that create variety in the park system but cannot be accommodated within other park sites due to size or location requirements. Incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) design principles. SIZE AND ACCESS • Size depends on the type of use proposed • Access from a higher order public street on at least one side for main park entry • Main park entry should front a street with transit or bicycle route when applicable • Access may be limited during certain times of the day or to specific recreation activities RECOMMENDED RESOURCES • Special use resource or facility • Internal pathway system • Park identification sign • Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack, etc.) POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES • Parking • Water • Lighting • Public art or historic element • Trails • Kiosk • Signage • Sports courts • Children’s play areas • Picnic shelters COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS • Restrooms • Interpretive facilities • Programmable spaces • Community Building • Rentable spaces • Unique facilities that do not fit in other parks in the system • Buildings and immediate landscaping should follow Low Impact Development practices • Buildings constructed within parks should be built to LEED Silver standard or better INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES • Any resource that would conflict with the intended special purpose of the park RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 193 DECISION MAKING TOOLS Natural Area Park INTENT Provide opportunities for users to interact with nature locally or protect natural resources and systems within the standards of the existing natural resource regulatory environment. Incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) design principles. SIZE AND ACCESS • Size of the natural area is variable, depending primarily on the extent of the natural resource being protected. • Access is dependent on size of property and type of natural area. Generally natural areas should have at least one identified entrance accessible from a public street. • Public access may be limited or excluded if the natural resource is deemed too fragile for interaction. However, maintenance access should be provided via trail or service road. RECOMMENDED RESOURCES • Park identification sign • Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack, etc.) • Internal pathway system (if feasible) POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Natural area parks with developable portions could incorporate elements of neighborhood, community and special use parks and corridors. • Kiosk • Signage • Trail head and trail • Water access • Off-street parking (if site is accessible) INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES Conflicting resources will depend on the character and quality of the natural area. If available, refer to the relevant natural area management plan for this site for additional guidance on the appropriate character and uses with the natural area. COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS • Restroom • Interpretive center • Buildings and immediate landscaping should follow Low Impact Development practices • Buildings constructed within parks should be built to LEED Silver standard or better RESOLUTION NO. 4398 194 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B Corridor INTENT Narrow swaths of land that serve as connections between parks or to other destinations. Lands can include public land, private partnerships and/or easements. A corridor site can be the location of a trail or can provide a habitat linkage between two larger areas. SIZE AND ACCESS • Size is dependent on corridor length and right-of-way or easement width and connectivity RECOMMENDED RESOURCES • Corridor identification signage • Site furnishings (trash receptacles, bike rack, etc.) POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES • Trailhead • Information kiosk • Interpretive signage • Off-street parking COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS • Restroom • Generally, corridors are not compatible with larger buildings due to their relatively small sites INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES • Any resource that conflicts with linkage RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 195 DECISION MAKING TOOLS Parks, Natural Areas and Infrastructure INTENT The desired result is reducing the amount of land reserved for the exclusive use of infrastructure and maximizing recreational value by combining community benefits of infrastructure investment with the recreational benefits of park land. DEFINITIONS Grey Infrastructure: The physical framework of the city, commonly thought of as the system of streets, pipes, facilities, bridges, towers and power lines that provide essential services. Green Infrastructure: Natural systems that perform some of the same essential services such as cleaning water, and retaining stormwater run-off as well as many additional functions such as cleaning the air, cooling our streets and processing and storing carbon that would otherwise contribute to atmospheric warming. Green infrastructure is often thought of in terms of multifunctional green infrastructure, where one piece of land or natural system can provide multiple benefits to the community. Green Infrastructure can exist in natural forms or be engineered for a particular purpose. INFRASTRUCTURE IN PARKS AND NATURAL AREAS The following considerations are critical to understanding how infrastructure can be integrated into park sites and natural areas: • Infrastructure designed and scaled for serving park/natural area needs should be allowed. • Additional capacity for needed or existing pipes, lines or facilities where the footprint within the site remains the same as necessary for park services. • Encourage the addition of green infrastructure designed to beautify areas that are not required for the primary functions of a park or to enhance the capacity of systems within natural areas. • Consider green or grey infrastructure that substitutes for standard elements (such as pervious paving or reinforced turf substituting for traditional parking lot paving). • Incorporate any additional maintenance requirements for infrastructure, to be paid for by the appropriate utility fund, into the project budget impacts. • If facilities such as pump stations are included, they should be designed to add to the park experience through interpretation of the system or by including needed features such as restrooms. • In natural areas consult the relevant management plan, if any, for more specifics about compatible infrastructure uses. • Avoid any infrastructure that interferes with the primary purpose or character of a park site. • Carefully locate vaults, towers or other structures that could impact park user safety, displace existing park amenities (unless adequately replaced) or interfere with planned expansion of a park or feature. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 196 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B PARK AND NATURAL AREA FEATURES IN INFRASTRUCTURE SITES Recreation and natural features can be added to existing and new sites that are primarily intended for infrastructure. If there is adequate developable area meeting the appropriate design guidelines, infrastructure sites can serve as neighborhood or community parks. Infrastructure sites of any size can be considered natural area parks if they contribute to protecting a natural resource or provide an opportunity to interact with nature: • Detention basins or other facilities should be designed to expand park opportunities when not in use or at full capacity. • Access to existing or new infrastructure sites (such as detention basins) or utility easements (such as power, water or sewer lines) should be pursued for expanded trail opportunities, creating habitat linkages and create local recreational and natural experiences. • In areas lacking local park access, consider underground reservoirs or other required infrastructure designed to accommodate recreation facilities above. • Constructing, protecting or restoring habitat areas, (such as nesting platforms on utility poles or natural resource enhancement in watershed recharge areas) particularly where public access is limited by the infrastructure function of the site. • Within infrastructure sites the issue of compliance with the existing regulatory framework is a critical consideration as many additional jurisdictions may come into play. Projects that become delayed or sidelined by safety or other access concerns at infrastructure sites could continue to be considered for the future, as the regulations and practices are slowly shifting toward shared use of facilities. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 197 DECISION MAKING TOOLS 2. NATURAL AREA EVALUATION TOOL This tool will support the community and City staff in gradually improving stewardship of Renton’s natural areas. When urban natural areas like those in Renton, are left untended, they are usually not stable, healthy ecosystems. Without management and intervention, these natural areas are likely to be on a long-term trajectory of deterioration that is difficult to notice unless actively monitored by experienced naturalists. This tool utilizes a systematic approach to prioritizing and managing these areas, beginning with inventories and moving into stabilization, at which point the natural area is no longer deteriorating, and then improvement, and gradually, restoration. The prioritization criteria will help the City decide which natural areas to focus on first for management plan development. Inventory Natural Areas Inventory each natural area. This initial inventory is a higher-level view and includes a walk-through by an experienced naturalist making field notes and taking photos. Collect the following information: i. Date and name of person conducting inventory ii. Size of area in acres iii. Ownership (In some cases sites may be managed by the city but owned by others.) iv. Identify critical areas and regulated shoreline v. Specify ecosystem type, for example: upland forest, riparian forest, wetland, other. vi. Presence and percent cover of each invasive species, which include non-native species that are likely to cause harm to the ecosystem. (Percent can be generalized but must be specific to each species.) vii. Condition rating: rate condition on a 5-point scale with 1 being poor and 5 being great, based on percent native plant cover. viii. Note and identify any rare plant communities or rare animal or plant species present and indicate locations on a map. ix. Landscape ecology or context: relationship to rivers, creeks, lakes, wetland systems, natural area corridors, or other habitats. x. Main threats or risks: these can include invasive weeds, encroachment by adjacent property owners, erosion, fire, etc. xi. Indicate access points, trailheads or parking areas associated with the sites. xii. Assign Management Level Define management tasks using the minimal-stabilize-improve-restore continuum. For all sites, maintenance is required and is shown as the final column in the continuum matrix. Table B.1 summarizes the management continuum, with intensity of management increasing left to right. The investment of time and money into management increases left to right until reaching the last column on the right, maintain. The assumption is that once natural areas have been restored, the level of effort to maintain them will be lower than that of the restoration work. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 198 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B INVESTMENT $$$$$$$$$$$$ MANAGEMENT MINIMAL STABILIZE*IMPROVE RESTORE MAINTAIN ISSUE: Safety • Inventory/baseline • Maintain trails, trailheads, parking areas • Vegetation management, including pruning level 1 trees • Remove hazard trees • Address homeless camps • Maintain signage • Maintain boundaries – fences, gates • Trash, litter removal • Identify & treat hazards • Address homeless camps • Enforcement of park rules – signage, patrols • Access control – repair/replace fences, gates • Trash, litter removal • Reduce fuel ladders • Create fire breaks • Maintain low fire risk edges • Identify sanctioned trails; remove volunteer trails • Add directional, info signage • Stormwater – erosion control BMPs • Create/maintain low fire risk communities in strategic locations • Increase user frequency with marketing of sanctioned trails to deter unwanted activities • Add interpretive signage • Same activities as ‘Minimal’ • Anticipate hazards and schedule preventative maintenance • Establish goals and objectives Invasive Species • Inventory/baseline • Periodic/irregular • Partner driven • Identify and treat invasives to stop spread • Focus on high risk species • Enforcement of land use restrictions • Partner driven • Reduce % invasive plants • Implement Early Detection Rapid Response program (EDRR) • Public education • Reach 80% native plant cover • Continue EDRR • Annual monitoring & treatment of all natural areas for at least 5 years • Same activities as ‘Minimal’ with lower frequency • Establish goals and objectives Table B.1: Management Continuum MAINTAINRESTOREIMPROVESTABILIZE Natural Area Management Continuum Increasing Habitat Quality RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 199 DECISION MAKING TOOLS INVESTMENT $$$$$$$$$$$$ MANAGEMENT MINIMAL STABILIZE*IMPROVE RESTORE MAINTAIN ISSUE: Native Species • Inventory/baseline • Periodic planting • Partner driven • Protect best areas • Plant disturbed or treated areas • Enforcement of land use restrictions • Expand planting to replace invasives • Public education • Add missing elements associated a with the ecosystem that aren’t present • Consider succession, corridors • Add interpretive signage • Monitor growth & succession • Establish goals and objectives Practices • Best Management Practices • Mitigation • Partner driven • Some volunteers • Enforcement of land use restrictions • Invasive plant management • Identify and treat hazards • Trail and vegetation maintenance • Native plant management • Selective tree removal • Planting • Signage • Tree density management • Invasive removal • Planting • Stormwater – erosion control BMPs • Same • Establish goals and objectives; evaluate effectiveness • Schedule preventative maintenance Wildlife • Inventory/baseline • Volunteer monitoring • Partner driven • Trap/remove invasive wildlife • Identify and treat hazards • Habitat improvements, enhancements i.e. nest boxes, snags, down wood • Public education • Release extirpated species to appropriate habitats • Monitor • Establish goals and objectives • Anticipate hazards and schedule preventative maintenance Monitoring & Adaptive Management • Inventory/baseline • None • Regularly monitor and remove invasive species • Create Desired Future Condition (DFC)** for each natural area • Monitor and adapt • Monitor and adapt • Update DFCs • Monitor and adapt • Establish goals and objectives; evaluate effectiveness • Update DFCs * Stabilization is the point at which a natural area is no longer deteriorating ** The term DFC means “Desired Future Condition.” This term is used in natural resource management to provide a sense of direction, usually over a long period of time (20 years or more). For example, a DFC for a mixed 60-year-old woodland might be to achieve “old growth forest conditions” at some future time, with intermediate stages identified along the way. Table B.1: Management Continuum (continued) RESOLUTION NO. 4398 200 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B Prioritize Sites Prioritization criteria can help the City allocate its resources judiciously and efficiently. The following are objective, easily measured criteria. Each item is given a score of 1 (low) to 5 (high). Those natural areas with the highest scores are prioritized over those with lower scores for establishing and implementing a Management Plan. Table B.2: Prioritization Criteria CRITERIA POINT SCALE 1 POINT 2 POINTS 3 POINTS 4 POINTS 5 POINTS Habitat condition: based on percent native plant cover. Poor condition <30% native cover Between 30-50% native cover Moderate condition between 50-70% native cover 70-90% native cover Excellent condition >90% native cover Connectivity & size: includes both size in acres and how well connected the site is to other natural areas. Connectivity can be direct, or as part of a “stepping stone” network of habitats (see figure B.1). Site is isolated from other natural areas Adjacent to a small habitat or proximity to a cluster of 2 or more habitats not separated by impassible barriers Adjacent to or existing as a medium sized habitat (10-20 acres) or in close proximity (within 1/3 mile) to a connecting corridor Adjacent to or existing as a medium/large sized habitat (20-30 acres), anchor habitat or connecting corridor Adjacent to or existing as a large habitat (>30 acres), anchor habitat or major connecting corridor Public support/ partnership: based on the existing level of community or partnership involvement. No current or little potential for activity Moderate- low volunteer activity An identified interest group/ potential partner, such as a friends group, or occasional volunteer activity Active public support group or partnership or regular volunteer activity Active public support group or partnership and regular volunteer activity Environmental education: environmental education or interpretation programs or potential. Sites with no existing programs or low potential for programming/ interpretation Moderate-low program usage Periodic program or potential for programming/ interpretation Regular, seasonal environmental education or interpretation programs Regular, year-round environmental education or interpretation programs Habitat types: Prioritize rare and unique habitat types Highly impacted habitat (i.e. clearcut) Degraded habitats with remnant natural feature such as stand of native trees or shrubs or man-made mitigation site Protected riparian corridors Emergent or forested wetlands, young upland forest Locally rare habitat types (i.e., mature forest) Figure B.1: Habitat Connectivity Diagram RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 201 DECISION MAKING TOOLS CRITERIA POINT SCALE 1 POINT 2 POINTS 3 POINTS 4 POINTS 5 POINTS Rare species: more points for sites that contain rare or listed plant or animal species (i.e. salmon, eagles). Rare species are unlikely to be on site Suitable habitat for rare species (size, structure, cover) Suspected presence of rare species (based on unconfirmed but credible community reports) Confirmed presence of locally rare species or species of interest Confirmed presence of wildlife species listed as endangered, threatened, or sensitive by a state or federal agency Public use: more points for sites with well used, sanctioned trails or facilities and high levels of use. Low use sites Moderate-low use sites Moderate use sites Moderate-high use sites High use sites Water resource: more points for natural areas connected to a water resource No water resources are on the site, but absence of impervious area helps groundwater recharge Presence of isolated, year- round pond Seasonal creek or in-stream pond Presence of seasonal pond or minor perennial creek Presence of fish bearing, perennial or otherwise major creek Return on previous or potential investment: more points for sites that had previously been invested in (i.e. restoration projects, mitigation banks). Low level of return Moderate-low level of return Moderate level of return Moderate-high level of return High level of return Threats: more points if lack of action would result in near term risk to public safety or habitats. Areas where neglect would result in a potential future threat to ecosystems or public safety beyond foreseeable future (>15 years) Areas where neglect would result in a potential future threat to ecosystems or public safety (7- 15 years) Areas where neglect would result in a mid- term threat to ecosystems or public safety (5-7 years) Areas where neglect would result in a near- term threat (2-5 years) to ecosystems or public safety Areas where neglect would result in an immediate threat to ecosystems (erosion, habitat loss) or public safety (i.e., fire) Staff judgment: allowance for staff to add points based on their experience of site. 0-5 points for otherwise unaccounted for benefits or advantages of acquiring a site. May be applied if staff expertise determines that criteria should be more heavily weighted. Watershed benefit: more points for sites that could have a wider watershed benefit beyond the immediate property boundaries. Site or proposed activity has very localized benefit Site or proposed activity has modest benefit beyond property boundaries Site or proposed activity has moderate benefit beyond property boundaries Site or proposed activity has large benefit beyond property boundaries Site or proposed activity has significant benefit beyond property boundaries Table B.2: Prioritization Criteria (continued) Figure B.1: Habitat Connectivity Diagram RESOLUTION NO. 4398 202 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B 3. PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA The set of criteria in this document will assist the Department in making decisions about which projects and programs should move forward first in alignment with the community values and vision. The criteria focuses on the vision and the types of projects that will be required to achieve it. The additional screen of potential and actual funding will be applied to the prioritized project list (and reapplied as the funding situation will change year-to-year). This will allow the funding options to focus on high priority projects. Application of Criteria Table B.3 provides details of the scoring. Fewer points indicate that a project is less likely to meet the criterion, while greater points indicate that the project is more likely to meet the criterion. After analyzing the project against the criteria, projects can then be compared to the current list of projects competing for City resources based on the total points. POINTS DESCRIPTION 0 Does not meet criterion or is not applicable. 1 Has potential to meet criterion 2 Minimally meets criterion 3 Basically meets criterion 4 Mostly meets criterion 5 Greatly meets criterion As new projects and programs are brought before the City the prioritization criteria can be applied. By adopting this practice the City would be assessing it’s projects and programs on an ongoing basis, so anytime there are new proposals a critical assessment can be made for later benchmarking. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 203 DECISION MAKING TOOLS Table B.3: Prioritization Criteria Scoring Prioritization Criteria: Projects or programs advance the community values and vision of Renton if they:0-5 Advance programming objectives: Project or program supports recreation programming key outcomes. • Does the project contribute to available space for recreation programming? • Does the project improve flexibility in providing a variety of recreation programming? • Does the project or program adapt to new demographics and trends in recreation? • Does the project or program support environmental education or nature interpretation? • Does the project or program facilitate gatherings and bringing the community together? Fulfill multiple planning objectives: Project or program is aligned with other adopted planning efforts of the City of Renton, King County or other aligned jurisdictions. • Does the project or program advance the goals of previous planning efforts by the City? • Does the project or program support regional planning objectives? • Does the project or program support the vision for the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan? Fill identified gaps in service: Project or program adds or improves park sites, recreation facilities, natural areas or recreation programs to fulfill an unmet need. • Does the project or program fill a geographic gap identified in the 2019 geographic analysis? • Does the project or program fulfill an unmet need identified in this Plan? • Is the project responsive to community demand? Enhance partnerships or volunteerism: Project or program creates new partnerships or strengthens existing partnerships. • Does the project or program incorporate cost-sharing, joint development or programmatic collaborations? • Does the project or program involve volunteers in planning, construction or programming? • Does the project include a friends group or other resources for ongoing stewardship of the improvements? RESOLUTION NO. 4398 204 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B Prioritization Criteria: Projects or programs advance the community values and vision of Renton if they:0-5 Enhance (or improves use of) existing facilities: Project or program makes the best possible use of the existing investments in land and facilities. • Does the project or program have enough interest or drawing power to increase recreational use of the location? • Does the project or program work in tandem with other City project work (i.e. trail development or maintenance during other utility maintenance projects) • Does the project develop or provide access to existing property the City has invested resources in purchasing? • Does the project enhance safety through design improvements or activation? Contribute to system sustainability: Project or program contributes to the long-term environmental and financial sustainability of the system. • Does the project or program stabilize, enhance or restore habitat or other ecological functions? • Does the project or program encourage stewardship of the City’s natural systems and recreation areas through hands-on interaction or education? • Does the program or project provide a direct return on the investment of community resources? • Does the program or project have indirect financial impacts such as economic development or tourism spending? • Have long-term maintenance resources been identified for the project or program? Strengthen identity: Project or program celebrates the unique features of Renton’s neighborhoods or the city as a whole. • Does the project or program celebrate cultural, ethnic or historical elements of Renton through art or interpretation? • Is the project associated with the Cedar River or Lake Washington (two natural features the community identifies with)? • Is the project or program associated with the Cedar River salmon run? • Does the project or program enhance the sense of Renton as a unique place (such as community gateways) or create a place where the community comes together? Table B.3: Prioritization Criteria Scoring RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 205 DECISION MAKING TOOLS EXAMPLE PROJECTS Following the scoring of all projects, a prioritized list has been created by sorting projects based on total scores. Further sorting of the project list could include project type (such as acquisition, development or renovation) or by park type. This allows projects to be highlighted based on funding applicability. It is important to note that all projects identified in this plan are important to achieving the vision and even those that score low do advance the system toward the plan vision. Prioritization Criteria Project Advances Programming ObjectivesMultiple Planning ObjectivesFills Identified Gaps in ServiceEnhances partnerships or volunteerismEnhances (or Improves Use of) Existing FacilitiesContributes to System SustainabilityStrengthens IdentityTotal Score Range 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-5 N.A.R.CO Property 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 33 Cedar River Park 5 5 3 2 5 4 5 29 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 206 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 207 DECISION MAKING TOOLS 4. CAPITAL AND OPERATIONS COST MODEL The cost of improvements at a park (and at the system-wide level) is an important consideration as the plan moves from this decision making stage into implementation planning. Critical cost considerations include both one-time capital costs and ongoing operations and maintenance costs. This tool will allow broad “planning level” costs to be identified based on the improvements recommended in the plan. The model is a flexible excel document that allows both the major improvements and cost assumptions to be modified to adjust for changing project decisions or refined cost figures. In addition to providing a snap-shot of the total costs the model can be used to create alternate scenarios, different packages of projects that result in different investments in the park system. It is important to understand the function of the model (including the assumptions) and how to modify it. Site Acreage The first input in the model is the current and proposed site acreage. These values are used to calculate per- acre costs of improvements based on existing acres, new acres or the total future size of a site. Major Project Types Six categories of projects were identified to reflect the major types of enhancements that are needed in Renton’s Parks and Natural Areas. In this model, an “X” indicates that the project type has been selected for the park in the same row. The planning cost assumptions for each of these are either per site or per acre and vary based on the category of park. A matrix showing the cost assumptions for each major project type and park category is included at the end of this appendix. These costs were developed based on Renton’s current expenditures and the experience of the planning team: Planning and Design: An allocation for a variety of possible planning and design needs, from site master planning to natural resource inventory and management plans. This allocation includes planning documents only, construction documents would be part of the development or renovation cost. Extensive environmental or survey work would require additional funds. Acquisition: New land required to build or expand the site. The basis for this value is an average of property recently sold in Renton. The cost value is calculated based on the difference between the existing acres and proposed acres indicated in the model. Development: Ground-up development of a new site from vacant land or the complete redevelopment of an existing site. This per-acre amount is based on Renton park development projects and other recent experience of the planning team. This cost includes construction documents. Renovation: Major enhancement or rebuilding of a set of existing features at a site. Renovation may or may not require stripping the site to bare ground but would involve substantial investment (estimated at 40% of the cost of development). “Improve” or “Restore” Stewardship Projects: The projects required in natural areas (or natural sections of otherwise developed parks) to improve or restore the natural systems and reduce the required effort to a maintenance level. As laid out in the Natural Area Assessment Tool, improving includes reducing invasive RESOLUTION NO. 4398 208 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B species and enhancing habitat over a 5-year period. Fully restoring may require multiple 5-year windows of work. Major Maintenance and Reinvestment: Most sites in the system will require maintenance and reinvestment beyond the general operating costs over the 20-year timeline of this plan. This will include replacement of individual features such as playgrounds, trail/pathway repairs, roof replacements etc. The cost of these investments is estimated at 25% of the development cost. Facilities Following these major categories are individual features that represent a significant capital investment in the site. Each of these facilities has an associated cost assumption. In addition to the identified items, space is left for “other” items that are generally one-off or unique to the site. Operations Costs Basic Maintenance: The starting point for operations cost is a per-acre cost for basic tasks such as mowing and garbage collection. For Natural Areas, the cost is intended to cover the “Minimal” and “Stabilize” management efforts described in the Natural Area Evaluation Tool, as well as the cost of maintaining the restored system. Other Operating Costs: Immediately adjacent to the “other” capital items is a space to recognize extra operational cost for future facilities. These are often, but not always, tied to unique features in the site. CAPITAL COST OPERATING COSTS Per Site Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Per Acre Planning and DesignAcquisitionDevelopmentRenovation"Improve" or "Restore" Stewardship ProjectsMajor Maintenance and ReinvestmentBasic MaintenanceNEIGHBORHOOD PARK $250,000 $450,000 $250,000 $100,000 $5,000 $62,500 $7,500 COMMUNITY PARK $450,000 $450,000 $200,000 $80,000 $5,000 $50,000 $12,000 REGIONAL PARK $600,000 $450,000 $200,000 $80,000 $5,000 $50,000 $15,000 SPECIAL USE $250,000 $450,000 $200,000 $80,000 $5,000 $50,000 $7,500 NATURAL AREA $150,000 $100,000 $40,000 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $500 CORRIDOR $50,000 $200,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $25,000 $2,000 FACILITY $250,000 $450,000 $200,000 $80,000 $5,000 $50,000 $7,500 TRAIL $50,000 $200,000 $100,000 $40,000 $5,000 $25,000 $2,000 Table B.4: Cost Assumptions RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 209 DECISION MAKING TOOLS CAPITAL COSTS NOTES PLAY AREA Small $350,000 Each, includes areas for tots and school age play. Range between $150 and $350,000. Higher end represents addition of accessible safety surfacing. Large $1,000,000 Each, includes more specialized and custom equipment, areas for tots and school age play. Range between $750,000 and $1,000,000 Destination As specified Unique, large-scale play area offering different play experiences, such as universally accessible or water play PICNIC SHELTER Small $175,000 Each (4 Tables) Large $500,000 Each (20 Tables) Multi-Purpose Trail $1,000,000 Per Mile, 10-16' paved path with gravel shoulders. Improvements required may include curb and gutter, curb ramps, drainage infrastructure adjustments and installations and minimal power pole relocation. Soft-surface Trail $100,000 Per Mile, includes some remediation in natural areas. SPORTS FIELDS Multi-Purpose $500,000 Each, natural turf field with basic drainage/prep and features With Artificial Turf and Lights $3,000,000 Each, based on similar projects in RCO grant database Sports Courts $75,000 Each, cost built based on either a tennis or basketball court PARK BUILDINGS Interpretive Center $2,000,000 Small, new building Multi-Generational Center $10,000,000 Next generation of community facility, slightly larger than existing neighborhood center Restroom $600,000 Each, assumes utilities in place. Other As Specified Major capital costs that are unique to the site Capital Cost Inflation 5%Inflation Factor for projection OPERATIONS COSTS NOTES Basic Maintenance See basic maintenance cost by park category in the table on page 208 Bonuses Additional operations allocations for facilities that increase overall costs. Sports Field $25,000 Each Restroom $35,000 Each Picnic Shelter $5,000 Each Recreation Staffing FTE $150,000 Per FTE/year (fully loaded). Small Building 3 $600,000 Each category includes the cost of staff, facilities maintenance and utilities. Medium Building 8 $1,496,000 Large Building 12 $2,187,000 Other As Specified Other operating costs for major unique facilities RESOLUTION NO. 4398 210 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B Existing Features: The final portion of the input section of the model is a summary of existing features that have operations implications in the model. Existing Sport Fields, Restrooms, Picnic Shelters and existing buildings are all assigned an additional “bonus” of operation resources reflecting of their impact on the system. There is also an “other” existing operations input here to capture major expenses such as the aquatic center that are unique in the system. RESULTS The next section of the model includes the results of the capital and operating cost calculations. For Total Capital Cost per-acre and per-site costs of the selected major project categories are added to the per-unit costs of other selected features. The total is then projected forward based on an inflation factor (currently set at 5%) to illustrate the cost of the individual projects (and totals) 5, 10 and 20 years into the future. It is important to note that this model does not include capital or operating costs that may result from partnership projects. Operating costs are calculated based on a per-acre basic maintenance cost and added to the relevant bonuses for existing and future operations-heavy facilities. This cost is split between the operating costs of existing features and those added to the system by new parks and features. The total operating cost is the sum of these two, removing any duplication of facilities that are being replaced. RESOLUTION NO. 4398 C PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL APPENDIX RESOLUTION NO. 4398 212 | CITY OF RENTON This page intentionally left blank APPENDIx C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELRESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 213 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-1 Ranked Cost Model Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) 1 N.A.R.CO Property Develop according to design guidelines and Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan to include artificial turf soccer fields, relocated trail, parking, picnic facilities, play area, restrooms, bike park/bmx/pump track and climbing wall. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 33 23,646,000$ 31,688,000$ 38,517,000$ 62,740,000$ 289,200$ 170,000$ 459,200$ 2 Cedar River Park Existing major building facilities include RCC and Carco Theatre. Enclose lap pool at Henry Moses Aquatic Center, potential field reconfiguration. Redevelop elements as shown on the revised Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Also included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 29 16,248,000$ 21,774,000$ 26,466,000$ 43,110,000$ 4,529,200$ 1,000,000$ 5,529,200$ 3 May Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor, install soft surface trail, trailhead(s), creek crossings and partner with Newcastle and King County. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. 28 5,700,000$ 7,639,000$ 9,285,000$ 15,124,000$ 22,100$ 4,900$ 27,000$ 4 Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Existing property is inefficient as configured. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 27 15,400,000$ 20,637,000$ 25,084,000$ 40,859,000$ 1,710,600$ 60,000$ 1,770,600$ 4 May Creek Park Develop park according to design guidelines (parking, picnic, play area, hard surface court, open turf area, restrooms, trail connections) using concept plan as a reference, create/implement management plan addressing wetlands. Potential acquisition to increase park usability. 27 9,830,000$ 13,173,000$ 16,012,000$ 26,082,000$ 124,500$ 65,500$ 190,000$ 4 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Construct the planned waterfront trail and park area, connecting the end of the existing water walk at the Cedar River Boathouse to the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.27 6,050,000$ 8,108,000$ 9,855,000$ 16,053,000$ -$ -$ -$ 5 Black River Riparian Forest Develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, complete site inventory/management plan, implement management plan. Location of Lake to Sound Trail constructed and maintained by King County (shown as regional trail connection on the concept plan). Site is in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Management Plan and the Black River Water Quality Management Plan. 26 7,862,000$ 10,536,000$ 12,807,000$ 20,861,000$ 46,700$ 600,000$ 646,700$ 5 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Maintain and enhance facility for non-motorized boating, acquire land for additional parking, expand technology, renovate S. beach restrooms & bathhouse. Replace parking lots, irrigation, swim beach promenade and rosewall/bulkhead. High level of ongoing reinvestment due to intensive use. Planned park bond improvements include multiple major replacement projects. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 7,824,000$ 10,485,000$ 12,745,000$ 20,760,000$ 1,002,000$ 15,000$ 1,017,000$ 5 Liberty Park Re-develop according to design standards and the Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan. Improve ballfields in the short term (for example levelling). Repurpose Community Building for environmental learning. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 7,825,000$ 10,486,000$ 12,746,000$ 20,762,000$ 252,200$ 600,000$ 852,200$ 5 Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site Re-master plan for future park development. Redevelopment of the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big 5 lot should include a plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend beyond the existing park, creating a civic center. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. 26 5,650,000$ 7,572,000$ 9,204,000$ 14,992,000$ 9,000$ 3,000$ 12,000$ 5 Ron Regis Park Improve existing and undeveloped fields (with natural turf); extend water service to the park; add a permanent restroom, playground, and picnic area(s). Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Potential for habitat improvements to stabilize shoreline. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 10,343,000$ 13,861,000$ 16,848,000$ 27,444,000$ 656,100$ 85,000$ 741,100$ 6 Cedar River Natural Area Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, Cedar River Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 25 3,281,000$ 4,397,000$ 5,345,000$ 8,706,000$ 132,100$ -$ 132,100$ 6 Cleveland Richardson Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement management plan. 25 10,537,000$ 14,120,000$ 17,163,000$ 27,957,000$ 178,500$ 65,000$ 243,500$ 6 North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Re-master plan park and redevelop neighborhood building for multi-generational use. Potential for partnerships. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 25 2,673,000$ 3,582,000$ 4,354,000$ 7,092,000$ 1,550,500$ -$ 1,550,500$ 6 Tiffany Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Expand to connect to Cascade Park. Potentially repurpose and expand neighborhood building for environmental learning as shown on concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.25 4,372,000$ 5,859,000$ 7,122,000$ 11,601,000$ 110,300$ -$ 110,300$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 1 C.1 - Ranked Project List and Cost Model RESOLUTION NO. 4398 214 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 215 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-1 Ranked Cost Model Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) 7 Edlund Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement management plan addressing wetland. Continue acquistions to make connection to the Panther Creek Wetland. 24 10,739,000$ 14,391,000$ 17,492,000$ 28,493,000$ 133,100$ 66,900$ 200,000$ 7 Kenyon Dobson Park Develop interpretive/education center, trailhead, parking, restrooms.24 3,725,000$ 4,992,000$ 6,068,000$ 9,884,000$ 14,300$ 600,000$ 614,300$ 8 Burnett Linear Park*Included in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center Plan. Improvements identify expanding park to the north (Renton Connector). Reconfigure existing parking lot between 4th and 5th. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 23 885,000$ 1,187,000$ 1,443,000$ 2,350,000$ 8,300$ 6,700$ 15,000$ 8 Honey Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Develop soft surface trail. Located in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 23 2,615,000$ 3,504,000$ 4,259,000$ 6,937,000$ 21,500$ -$ 21,500$ 8 Trail Expansion & Development Trail connection projects from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan that are connected to parks and natural areas.23 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$ 9 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park A new park with lakefront access as noted in the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS dated 10/21/03.22 19,350,000$ 25,931,000$ 31,519,000$ 51,341,000$ -$ 1,125,000$ 1,125,000$ 9 Sports Complex Acquire, plan and develop a 4 field (or more) sports complex to centralize competitive play.22 24,050,000$ 32,229,000$ 39,175,000$ 63,812,000$ -$ 282,500$ 282,500$ 10 Cedar River Trail Park Invasive species removal, add utilities for Cedar River Boathouse. Included in City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Planned connection to future Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.21 2,039,000$ 2,732,000$ 3,321,000$ 5,410,000$ 221,200$ -$ 221,200$ 10 Panther Creek/Edlund Property Included in Edlund Property concept plan. Develop a management plan. Acquire land and easements as needed to connect to the Panther Creek Wetlands.21 55,000$ 74,000$ 90,000$ 147,000$ 1,800$ -$ 1,800$ 11 Panther Creek Wetlands Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor. Create pedestrian trails and boardwalk system. Managed by Surface Water Utility.20 4,960,000$ 6,647,000$ 8,079,000$ 13,160,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$ 11 Philip Arnold Park Potential partnership with neighboring landowner (currently Puget Sound Energy) to enhance usability and access. Improve ballfield and multipurpose field. Renovate or remove neighborhood building and restrooms. Included in the City Center Plan. Planned park bond improvements include: relocate playground, improve ADA accessibility, refurbish picnic areas, refurbish basketball court surround, refurbish parking lot, add lighting and a loop trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 20 4,179,000$ 5,600,000$ 6,807,000$ 11,088,000$ 183,300$ 5,000$ 188,300$ 11 Senior Activity Center Property Potentially expand for multi-generational center. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.20 140,000$ 188,000$ 229,000$ 373,000$ 1,552,000$ -$ 1,552,000$ 11 Corridor Acquisition Acquire or secure new properties providing important linkages between parks and natural areas. Included in the City Center Plan and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan.20 6,000,000$ 8,041,000$ 9,774,000$ 15,921,000$ -$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 11 Trailheads and Parking Identify and develop appropriate access points to natural areas.20 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$ 12 City Center Neighborhood Park 1 Develop neighborhood park amenities at existing Senior Activity Center site after phasing out existing maintenance buildings, which will require acquisition of a new site. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 19 5,488,000$ 7,354,000$ 8,939,000$ 14,561,000$ 21,000$ 81,500$ 102,500$ 12 Jones Park Shoreline stabilization. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Adjacent trail corridor adds enough size to serve as a full neighborhood park. Park in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and Cedar River Basin Plan.19 1,017,000$ 1,363,000$ 1,657,000$ 2,699,000$ 43,000$ -$ 43,000$ 12 Kiwanis Park Potential acquisition to expand park to increase usability. Bond improvements include: improving field and installing ADA access from Union Avenue, renovating or removing neighborhood building, replacing playground and renovating hard surface courts and parking, and adding picnic plaza. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 19 2,838,000$ 3,803,000$ 4,623,000$ 7,530,000$ 127,500$ 5,000$ 132,500$ 12 Sunset Neighborhood Park Final phase contruction to be completed in 2020. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 200,000$ 268,000$ 326,000$ 531,000$ 64,000$ -$ 64,000$ 12 Thomas Teasdale Park Improve outfield drainage. Potential re-purpose of neighborhood building. Renovate existing ballfield to create all-abilities ballfield. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 3,420,000$ 4,583,000$ 5,571,000$ 9,075,000$ 137,500$ -$ 137,500$ 13 Renton Wetlands Continue to manage as required by Mitigation Banking Agreements. Portion managed by Surface Water Utility. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Plan.18 430,000$ 576,000$ 700,000$ 1,140,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$ 14 East Plateau Community Park Acquire site from King County and re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.17 14,675,000$ 19,666,000$ 23,904,000$ 38,937,000$ -$ 605,000$ 605,000$ 14 Kennydale Lions Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Park acreage is not fully developed and current configuration of facilities limits usage. Renovate existing neighborhood building. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 17 2,994,000$ 4,012,000$ 4,877,000$ 7,944,000$ 41,300$ 40,000$ 81,300$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 2 C.1 - Ranked Project List and Cost Model RESOLUTION NO. 4398 216 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 217 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-1 Ranked Cost Model Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) 14 Non-motorized Boating Facility Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for a non-motorized boating facility. Enhance existing non- motorized boating facility.17 3,250,000$ 4,355,000$ 5,294,000$ 8,623,000$ -$ -$ -$ 15 Parkwood South Div #3 Park*Acquire adjacent land to bring this site up to minimum size of 2 acres of developable land; master plan and develop a neighborhood park according to design guidelines.16 448,000$ 601,000$ 731,000$ 1,191,000$ 4,300$ 200$ 4,500$ 15 Community Gardens Acquire land and/or develop additional community gardens through partnerships, potentially as part of new neighborhood or community parks.16 760,000$ 1,018,000$ 1,237,000$ 2,015,000$ -$ 2,300$ 2,300$ 16 Cascade Park Renovate according to design guildelines using the concept plan as a reference. Expand park to connect Cascade Park to Tiffany Park, improve road access and increase visibility. Potential for off leash area within park. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 15 6,161,000$ 8,256,000$ 10,035,000$ 16,346,000$ 83,300$ 69,500$ 152,800$ 16 Earlington Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15 206,000$ 276,000$ 335,000$ 546,000$ 11,300$ -$ 11,300$ 16 Kennydale Beach Park*Reconfigure dock for improved life guarding, renovate restroom/lifeguard facility. Acquire land to enhance usability. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 15 896,000$ 1,201,000$ 1,460,000$ 2,378,000$ 85,600$ 5,300$ 90,900$ 16 Wayfinding and Informational Signage Design and implement wayfinding and park signage throughout the parks, recreation and natural areas system and install information kiosks and trailhead signage at key points in the trail system.15 650,000$ 872,000$ 1,060,000$ 1,727,000$ -$ -$ -$ 17 Maplewood Golf Course Continue to maintain and operate, acquire property as it becomes available. See adopted Master Plan, included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital and operations costs are outside of the Community Services budget, within an enterprise fund. Capital Improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 17 SE 186th Place Properties*Undersized and surrounded by private property; potential for community garden, tree nursery or play area to serve local residents. If not used for neighborhood park functions, replace with an additional park east of SR 515. 14 1,250,000$ 1,675,000$ 2,036,000$ 3,316,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$ 17 Soos Creek Greenway: Boulevard Lane A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This neighborhood park may be transferred to the City and rennovated. This park includes a substantial natural area.14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 227,300$ 227,300$ 17 Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Renovate site with features that differentiate it from nearby Thomas Teasedale Park. Potentially add loop walk and picnic area. Refurbish tennis and pickleball courts. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 673,000$ 902,000$ 1,096,000$ 1,785,000$ 19,500$ -$ 19,500$ 17 Windsor Hills Park Potential acquisitions to enhance park usability and visibility from street. Redevelop according to design guideline and concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.14 3,635,000$ 4,871,000$ 5,921,000$ 9,645,000$ 34,800$ 16,400$ 51,200$ 17 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park east of S Benson Rd and north of SE Puget Drive.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 17 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park west of SR 515 around SE 192nd Street.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of SE 128th Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of Sunset Boulevard, west of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of NE 3rd Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park west of I-405.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park east of I-405 and north of the May Creek Greenway.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 18 West Hills Neighborhood Park Acquire and develop one neighborhood park north of Renton Avenue. 13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 18 Cedar River Trail Corridor Secure ownership of remaining railbanked corridor land between the trestle bridge and Ron Regis Park, also the remaining corridor near I-405, include acquired land in the surrounding parks and natural areas; maintain corridor as a regional trail linkage. 13 2,903,000$ 3,890,000$ 4,728,000$ 7,701,000$ 35,000$ 25,800$ 60,800$ 18 Community Garden/Greenhouse Continue to maintain and operate, expand garden. Potential to be larger neighborhood Park - Planning and acquisition included in City Center Neighborhood Park 1. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 13 30,000$ 40,000$ 49,000$ 80,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$ 18 Dog Parks Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for off-leash areas in four neighborhood or community parks or other locations.13 1,030,000$ 1,381,000$ 1,679,000$ 2,735,000$ 60,000$ 17,500$ 77,500$ 19 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This property may be transferred to the City once Soos Creek Trail is complete.12 -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 9,300$ 44,300$ 20 Riverview Park Park in Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.11 465,000$ 623,000$ 757,000$ 1,233,000$ 133,000$ -$ 133,000$ 21 Lake Street Open Space Potential trailhead. Acquire easements as neccesary to connect to Panther Creek Wetlands.10 3,000$ 4,000$ 5,000$ 8,000$ 200$ -$ 200$ 21 Tonkin Park Redevelop per Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. 10 183,000$ 245,000$ 298,000$ 485,000$ 1,200$ 5,000$ 6,200$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 3 C.1 - Ranked Project List and Cost Model RESOLUTION NO. 4398 218 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 219 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-1 Ranked Cost Model Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) 22 Skate Parks Develop new skate park within a community park.9 600,000$ 804,000$ 977,000$ 1,591,000$ -$ -$ -$ 23 Maplewood Park Renovate or remove restrooms. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.8 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 44,900$ -$ 44,900$ 23 Veterans Memorial Park Tile refurbishment. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan.8 11,000$ 15,000$ 18,000$ 29,000$ 1,700$ -$ 1,700$ 24 Glencoe Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 31,000$ 42,000$ 51,000$ 83,000$ 3,800$ -$ 3,800$ 24 Heritage Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 133,800$ -$ 133,800$ 24 Maplewood Roadside Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan.7 54,000$ 72,000$ 88,000$ 143,000$ 8,100$ -$ 8,100$ 25 Springbrook Watershed Managed by Water Utility, not accessible to the public. Capital and operations costs are outside of Community Services budget.6 -$ -$ -$ 26,100$ -$ 26,100$ 26 Sit In Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. Included in Downtown Civic Core.3 25,000$ 34,000$ 41,000$ 67,000$ 3,700$ -$ 3,700$ TOTAL 333,092,000$ 446,372,000$ 542,574,000$ 883,796,000$ 14,056,300$ 6,827,100$ 20,883,400$ Note: Operating Cost totals remove double counting of replaced facilities. Totals do not include improvements to School District facilities that may result from new partnership opportunities. * Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines **Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities. Renton_Cost_Model_010720 4 C.1 - Ranked Project List and Cost Model RESOLUTION NO. 4398 220 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 221 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-2 Cost Model Support Priority #Project Park Type Project Type Current AcresProposed AcresPlanning and DesignAcquisitionDevelopmentRenovationStewardship ProjectsMajor Maintenance and ReinvestmentAdditional Play Area - SmallAdditional Play Area - LargeAdditional Picnic Shelter - SmallAdditional Picnic Shelter - LargeAdditional Multi-Purpose Trails (Miles) Additional Soft-Surface Trails (Miles) Additional Multi Purpose Sport FieldAdditional Sport Field with Artificial Turf/LightsAdditional Sport CourtsAdditional RestroomNew BuildingOther Major Additional CapitalDescription Other Environmental/PermittingOther Environmental/Permitting Description Other Additional OperationsDescription: Additional Operations Existing Sport Fields (Total)Total RestroomsExisting Picnic SheltersExisting BuildingExisting Other Major Operations Maintenance CostsOther Operation Costs Explanation1 N.A.R.CO Property COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 24.1 24.1 X X X X 1 1 0.8 4 2 2,200,000$ Grant buy-back for Open Space Funds, BMX/Pump Track, field maintenance building 0 0 0 2 Cedar River Park COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 20.6 20.6 X X X X 1 8,000,000$ Aquatic center expansion, community center expansion, redevelopment per concept plan 1,000,000$ Expanded pool operations, redevelopment per concept plan 1 2 0 Large 2,000,000$ Pool 3 May Creek Greenway NATURAL AREA EXISTING 44.2 54.0 X X X X X 1.5 100,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 0 0 4 Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 10.8 10.8 X X X 1 1 1.0 1 4 1 8,350,000$ Skate area and new community center 2 1 0 Medium 4 May Creek Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING UNDEVELOPED 16.6 20.0 X X X X X 2 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 100,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 0 0 4 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail CORRIDOR FUTURE PARK 0.0 0.0 X X X 6,000,000$ Over water trail 0 0 0 5 Black River Riparian Forest NATURAL AREA EXISTING UNDEVELOPED 93.3 93.3 X X X X X 0.3 0.3 Interpretive Center 250,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 0 0 5 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park REGIONAL PARK EXISTING 51.3 52.3 X X X X 50,000$ Environmental permitting and mitigation 0 4 4 72,000$ 5000 hours of Lifeguards 5 Liberty Park COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 10.6 10.6 X X X 1 5 Interpretive Center 2,000,000$ Skate park, rennovated building, dog park 2 2 1 5 Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site SPECIAL USE EXISTING 1.2 1.6 X X X 5,000,000$ Re-master plan and redevelop full site 0 0 0 5 Ron Regis Park COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 43.4 43.4 X X X X 1 2 1.0 3 1 1,000,000$ Install lighting 100,000$ Environmental permitting and mitigation 4 1 0 6 Cedar River Natural Area NATURAL AREA EXISTING 264.2 264.2 X X X X 2.0 25,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 0 0 6 Cleveland Richardson Property NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING UNDEVELOPED 23.8 23.8 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 1 500,000$ Farmhouse repurposing 200,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 0 0 6 North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 2.6 2.6 X X X 1 1,000,000$ Redevelop neighborhood building for multi-generational use 0 1 0 Medium 6 Tiffany Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 6.7 6.7 X X X X X 1 1.0 750,000$ Potentially repurpose and expand neighborhood building 125,000$ Environmental permitting and mitigation 1 1 0 7 Edlund Property NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING UNDEVELOPED 17.7 20.0 X X X X X 1 3 1.0 1 1,000,000$ Barn and bridge restoration 150,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 0 0 7 Kenyon Dobson Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING UNDEVELOPED 1.9 1.9 X X 1.0 Interpretive Center Trailhead, parking 0 0 0 8 Burnett Linear Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 1.1 2.0 X X X X 0 0 0 8 Honey Creek Greenway NATURAL AREA EXISTING 43.0 43.0 X X X X X 1.0 0 0 0 8 Trail Expansion & Development TRAIL FUTURE PARK X X X X 0 0 9 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park REGIONAL PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 75.0 X X X 0 0 0 9 Sports Complex FACILITY FUTURE PARK 0.0 15.0 X X X 1 1 4 2 0 0 0 10 Cedar River Trail Park COMMUNITY PARK EXISTING 15.1 15.1 X X X 0 1 1 10 Panther Creek/Edlund Property NATURAL AREA EXISTING 3.7 3.7 X X X 0 0 0 11 Panther Creek Wetlands NATURAL AREA EXISTING 69.1 69.1 X X X X 1.5 200,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 1 0 11 Philip Arnold Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 11.1 11.1 X X X 1 1 1.0 1 Renovate or remove neighborhood building 1 2 1 11 Senior Activity Center Property SPECIAL USE EXISTING 2.8 2.8 X 0 1 0 Medium 11 Corridor Acquisition CORRIDOR FUTURE PARK 0.0 20.0 X X 0 0 0 11 Trailheads and Parking TRAIL FUTURE PARK X X X 0 0 0 Renton_Cost_Model_010720 5 C.2 - Cost Model Support Material RESOLUTION NO. 4398 222 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 223 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-2 Cost Model Support Priority #Project Park Type Project Type Current AcresProposed AcresPlanning and DesignAcquisitionDevelopmentRenovationStewardship ProjectsMajor Maintenance and ReinvestmentAdditional Play Area - SmallAdditional Play Area - LargeAdditional Picnic Shelter - SmallAdditional Picnic Shelter - LargeAdditional Multi-Purpose Trails (Miles) Additional Soft-Surface Trails (Miles) Additional Multi Purpose Sport FieldAdditional Sport Field with Artificial Turf/LightsAdditional Sport CourtsAdditional RestroomNew BuildingOther Major Additional CapitalDescription Other Environmental/PermittingOther Environmental/Permitting Description Other Additional OperationsDescription: Additional Operations Existing Sport Fields (Total)Total RestroomsExisting Picnic SheltersExisting BuildingExisting Other Major Operations Maintenance CostsOther Operation Costs Explanation12 City Center Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING UNDEVELOPED 2.8 5.0 X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 900,000$ Acquire new site for maintenance buildings (2 acres) 0 0 0 12 Jones Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 1.1 1.1 X X 0.3 300,000$ Cedar River Trail design and construction 100,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 1 0 12 Kiwanis Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 9.0 9.0 X X X 1 1 1 Renovate or remove neighborhood building 1 1 0 12 Sunset Neighborhood Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 3.2 3.2 X 0 1 1 12 Thomas Teasdale Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 9.7 9.7 X X X 1 1,000,000$ Improve with all-abilities sport field; repurpose neighborhood building 1 1 1 13 Renton Wetlands NATURAL AREA EXISTING 139.2 139.2 x 0.3 0.3 100,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 0 0 14 East Plateau Community Park COMMUNITY PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 42.5 X X X 1 2 2.0 2 2 1 0 0 0 14 Kennydale Lions Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 5.5 5.5 X X X 1 1.0 1 1 0 0 0 14 Non-motorized Boating Facility FACILITY FUTURE PARK X X 3,000,000$ Non-motorized boat facility Assume operation by partners 0 0 0 15 Parkwood South Div #3 Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING UNDEVELOPED 0.6 0.6 X X X X 0 0 0 15 Community Gardens FACILITY FUTURE PARK 0.0 0.3 X X X X 300,000$ 15,000 sf raised beds 0 0 0 16 Cascade Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 11.1 15.7 X X X X 1.0 1 150,000$ Dog park 0 0 0 16 Earlington Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 1.5 1.5 X X 0 0 0 16 Kennydale Beach Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 1.3 2.0 X X X X 80,000$ Environmental studies and mitigation 0 1 0 41,000$ 3,000 hours of Lifeguards 16 Wayfinding and Informational Signage FACILITY FUTURE PARK 0.0 0.0 X X 400,000$ Signage installation 0 0 0 17 Maplewood Golf Course SPECIAL USE EXISTING 192.3 192.3 0 0 0 17 SE 186th Place Properties*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING UNDEVELOPED 0.6 0.6 X X 1 0.5 0 0 0 17 Soos Creek Greenway: Boulevard Lane NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 30.3 0 0 0 17 Talbot Hill Reservoir Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 2.6 2.6 X X X 0 0 0 17 Windsor Hills Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 4.6 5.5 X X X X 2 2 200,000$ Dog park with agility area 30,000$ Environmental permitting and mitigation 0 0 0 17 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 17 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 18 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 18 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 18 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 18 West Hills Neighborhood Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK FUTURE PARK 0.0 5.0 X X X X 1 1 1.0 1 2 1 0 0 0 18 Cedar River Trail Corridor CORRIDOR EXISTING 0.0 12.9 X X 0 1 0 18 Community Garden/Greenhouse SPECIAL USE EXISTING 0.6 0.6 X 0 0 0 18 Dog Parks FACILITY FUTURE PARK 0.0 1.0 X X X X 80,000$ Per facility 10,000$ Additional Maintenance 1 1 0 19 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park NATURAL AREA FUTURE PARK 0.0 18.6 0 1 0 20 Riverview Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 12.4 12.4 X 0 1 1 21 Lake Street Open Space NATURAL AREA EXISTING 0.3 0.3 X 0 0 0 21 Tonkin Park SPECIAL USE EXISTING 0.2 0.2 X 1 0 0 0 22 Skate Parks FACILITY FUTURE PARK X X 350,000$ Each smaller skate area 0 0 0 23 Maplewood Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 2.0 2.0 X X X 1 0 1 23 Veterans Memorial Park SPECIAL USE EXISTING 0.2 0.2 X 0 0 0 24 Glencoe Park*NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 0.5 0.5 X 0 0 0 24 Heritage Park NEIGHBORHOOD PARK EXISTING 9.2 9.2 X 1 1 1 24 Maplewood Roadside Park SPECIAL USE EXISTING 1.1 1.1 X 0 0 0 25 Springbrook Watershed NATURAL AREA EXISTING 52.2 52.2 0 0 0 26 Sit In Park SPECIAL USE EXISTING 0.5 0.5 X 0 0 0 TOTAL 1,243.1 1,529.8 52 32 39 16 13 58 25 3 25 3 25.7 5.1 17 8 33 25 3 $ 42,480,000 $ 1,610,000 $ 1,010,000 Note: Operating Cost totals remove double counting of replaced facilities. Totals do not include improvements to School District facilities that may result from new partnership opportunities. * Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines **Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities. Renton_Cost_Model_010720 6 C.2 - Cost Model Support Material RESOLUTION NO. 4398 224 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 225 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-3 By Park Category Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) Neighborhood Parks 1 May Creek Park Develop park according to design guidelines (parking, picnic, play area, hard surface court, open turf area, restrooms, trail connections) using concept plan as a reference, create/implement management plan addressing wetlands. Potential acquisition to increase park usability. 27 9,830,000$ 13,173,000$ 16,012,000$ 26,082,000$ 124,500$ 65,500$ 190,000$ 2 Cleveland Richardson Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement management plan. 25 10,537,000$ 14,120,000$ 17,163,000$ 27,957,000$ 178,500$ 65,000$ 243,500$ 2 North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Re-master plan park and redevelop neighborhood building for multi-generational use. Potential for partnerships. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 25 2,673,000$ 3,582,000$ 4,354,000$ 7,092,000$ 1,550,500$ -$ 1,550,500$ 2 Tiffany Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Expand to connect to Cascade Park. Potentially repurpose and expand neighborhood building for environmental learning as shown on concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 25 4,372,000$ 5,859,000$ 7,122,000$ 11,601,000$ 110,300$ -$ 110,300$ 3 Edlund Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement management plan addressing wetland. Continue acquistions to make connection to the Panther Creek Wetland. 24 10,739,000$ 14,391,000$ 17,492,000$ 28,493,000$ 133,100$ 66,900$ 200,000$ 3 Kenyon Dobson Park Develop interpretive/education center, trailhead, parking, restrooms.24 3,725,000$ 4,992,000$ 6,068,000$ 9,884,000$ 14,300$ 600,000$ 614,300$ 4 Burnett Linear Park*Included in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center Plan. Improvements identify expanding park to the north (Renton Connector). Reconfigure existing parking lot between 4th and 5th. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 23 885,000$ 1,187,000$ 1,443,000$ 2,350,000$ 8,300$ 6,700$ 15,000$ 5 Philip Arnold Park Potential partnership with neighboring landowner (currently Puget Sound Energy) to enhance usability and access. Improve ballfield and multipurpose field. Renovate or remove neighborhood building and restrooms. Included in the City Center Plan. Planned park bond improvements include: relocate playground, improve ADA accessibility, refurbish picnic areas, refurbish basketball court surround, refurbish parking lot, add lighting and a loop trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 20 4,179,000$ 5,600,000$ 6,807,000$ 11,088,000$ 183,300$ 5,000$ 188,300$ 6 City Center Neighborhood Park 1 Develop neighborhood park amenities at existing Senior Activity Center site after phasing out existing maintenance buildings, which will require acquisition of a new site. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 19 5,488,000$ 7,354,000$ 8,939,000$ 14,561,000$ 21,000$ 81,500$ 102,500$ 6 Jones Park Shoreline stabilization. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Adjacent trail corridor adds enough size to serve as a full neighborhood park. Park in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and Cedar River Basin Plan. 19 1,017,000$ 1,363,000$ 1,657,000$ 2,699,000$ 43,000$ -$ 43,000$ 6 Kiwanis Park Potential acquisition to expand park to increase usability. Bond improvements include: improving field and installing ADA access from Union Avenue, renovating or removing neighborhood building, replacing playground and renovating hard surface courts and parking, and adding picnic plaza. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 19 2,838,000$ 3,803,000$ 4,623,000$ 7,530,000$ 127,500$ 5,000$ 132,500$ 6 Sunset Neighborhood Park Final phase contruction to be completed in 2020. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 200,000$ 268,000$ 326,000$ 531,000$ 64,000$ -$ 64,000$ 6 Thomas Teasdale Park Improve outfield drainage. Potential re-purpose of neighborhood building. Renovate existing ballfield to create all-abilities ballfield. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 3,420,000$ 4,583,000$ 5,571,000$ 9,075,000$ 137,500$ -$ 137,500$ 7 Kennydale Lions Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Park acreage is not fully developed and current configuration of facilities limits usage. Renovate existing neighborhood building. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 17 2,994,000$ 4,012,000$ 4,877,000$ 7,944,000$ 41,300$ 40,000$ 81,300$ 8 Parkwood South Div #3 Park*Acquire adjacent land to bring this site up to minimum size of 2 acres of developable land; master plan and develop a neighborhood park according to design guidelines.16 448,000$ 601,000$ 731,000$ 1,191,000$ 4,300$ 200$ 4,500$ 9 Cascade Park Renovate according to design guildelines using the concept plan as a reference. Expand park to connect Cascade Park to Tiffany Park, improve road access and increase visibility. Potential for off leash area within park. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 15 6,161,000$ 8,256,000$ 10,035,000$ 16,346,000$ 83,300$ 69,500$ 152,800$ 9 Earlington Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15 206,000$ 276,000$ 335,000$ 546,000$ 11,300$ -$ 11,300$ 9 Kennydale Beach Park*Reconfigure dock for improved life guarding, renovate restroom/lifeguard facility. Acquire land to enhance usability. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15 896,000$ 1,201,000$ 1,460,000$ 2,378,000$ 85,600$ 5,300$ 90,900$ 10 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park east of S Benson Rd and north of SE Puget Drive.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 10 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park west of SR 515 around SE 192nd Street.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 10 SE 186th Place Properties*Undersized and surrounded by private property; potential for community garden, tree nursery or play area to serve local residents. If not used for neighborhood park functions, replace with an additional park east of SR 515. 14 1,250,000$ 1,675,000$ 2,036,000$ 3,316,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$ 10 Soos Creek Greenway: Boulevard Lane A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This neighborhood park may be transferred to the City and rennovated. This park includes a substantial natural area.14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 227,300$ 227,300$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 7 C.3 - Project List and Cost Model by Park Category RESOLUTION NO. 4398 226 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 227 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-3 By Park Category Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) 10 Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Renovate site with features that differentiate it from nearby Thomas Teasedale Park. Potentially add loop walk and picnic area. Refurbish tennis and pickleball courts. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 673,000$ 902,000$ 1,096,000$ 1,785,000$ 19,500$ -$ 19,500$ 10 Windsor Hills Park Potential acquisitions to enhance park usability and visibility from street. Redevelop according to design guideline and concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.14 3,635,000$ 4,871,000$ 5,921,000$ 9,645,000$ 34,800$ 16,400$ 51,200$ 11 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 11 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of SE 128th Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 11 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of Sunset Boulevard, west of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 11 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of NE 3rd Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 11 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park west of I-405.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 11 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park east of I-405 and north of the May Creek Greenway.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 11 West Hills Neighborhood Park Acquire and develop one neighborhood park north of Renton Avenue.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 12 Riverview Park Park in Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.11 465,000$ 623,000$ 757,000$ 1,233,000$ 133,000$ -$ 133,000$ 13 Maplewood Park Renovate or remove restrooms. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.8 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 44,900$ -$ 44,900$ 14 Glencoe Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 31,000$ 42,000$ 51,000$ 83,000$ 3,800$ -$ 3,800$ 14 Heritage Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 133,800$ -$ 133,800$ Subtotal Neighborhood Parks 139,350,000$ 186,737,000$ 226,986,000$ 369,739,000$ 3,295,900$ 2,176,800$ 5,472,700$ Community Parks 1 N.A.R.CO Property Develop according to design guidelines and Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan to include artificial turf soccer fields, relocated trail, parking, picnic facilities, play area, restrooms, bike park/bmx/pump track and climbing wall. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 33 23,646,000$ 31,688,000$ 38,517,000$ 62,740,000$ 289,200$ 170,000$ 459,200$ 2 Cedar River Park Existing major building facilities include RCC and Carco Theatre. Enclose lap pool at Henry Moses Aquatic Center, potential field reconfiguration. Redevelop elements as shown on the revised Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Also included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 29 16,248,000$ 21,774,000$ 26,466,000$ 43,110,000$ 4,529,200$ 1,000,000$ 5,529,200$ 3 Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Existing property is inefficient as configured. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 27 15,400,000$ 20,637,000$ 25,084,000$ 40,859,000$ 1,710,600$ 60,000$ 1,770,600$ 4 Liberty Park Re-develop according to design standards and the Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan. Improve ballfields in the short term (for example levelling). Repurpose Community Building for environmental learning. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 7,825,000$ 10,486,000$ 12,746,000$ 20,762,000$ 252,200$ 600,000$ 852,200$ 4 Ron Regis Park Improve existing and undeveloped fields (with natural turf); extend water service to the park; add a permanent restroom, playground, and picnic area(s). Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Potential for habitat improvements to stabilize shoreline. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 10,343,000$ 13,861,000$ 16,848,000$ 27,444,000$ 656,100$ 85,000$ 741,100$ 5 Cedar River Trail Park Invasive species removal, add utilities for Cedar River Boathouse. Included in City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Planned connection to future Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 21 2,039,000$ 2,732,000$ 3,321,000$ 5,410,000$ 221,200$ -$ 221,200$ 6 East Plateau Community Park Acquire site from King County and re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.17 14,675,000$ 19,666,000$ 23,904,000$ 38,937,000$ -$ 605,000$ 605,000$ Subtotal Community Parks 90,176,000$ 120,844,000$ 146,886,000$ 239,262,000$ 7,658,500$ 2,520,000$ 10,178,500$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 8 C.3 - Project List and Cost Model by Park Category RESOLUTION NO. 4398 228 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 229 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-3 By Park Category Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) Regional Park 1 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Maintain and enhance facility for non-motorized boating, acquire land for additional parking, expand technology, renovate S. beach restrooms & bathhouse. Replace parking lots, irrigation, swim beach promenade and rosewall/bulkhead. High level of ongoing reinvestment due to intensive use. Planned park bond improvements include multiple major replacement projects. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 7,824,000$ 10,485,000$ 12,745,000$ 20,760,000$ 1,002,000$ 15,000$ 1,017,000$ 2 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park A new park with lakefront access as noted in the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS dated 10/21/03.22 19,350,000$ 25,931,000$ 31,519,000$ 51,341,000$ -$ 1,125,000$ 1,125,000$ Subtotal Regional Parks 27,174,000$ 36,416,000$ 44,264,000$ 72,101,000$ 1,002,000$ 1,140,000$ 2,142,000$ Special Use Parks 1 Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site Re-master plan for future park development. Redevelopment of the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big 5 lot should include a plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend beyond the existing park, creating a civic center. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. 26 5,650,000$ 7,572,000$ 9,204,000$ 14,992,000$ 9,000$ 3,000$ 12,000$ 2 Senior Activity Center Property Potentially expand for multi-generational center. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.20 140,000$ 188,000$ 229,000$ 373,000$ 1,552,000$ -$ 1,552,000$ 3 Maplewood Golf Course Continue to maintain and operate, acquire property as it becomes available. See adopted Master Plan, included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital and operations costs are outside of the Community Services budget, within an enterprise fund. Capital Improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4 Community Garden/Greenhouse Continue to maintain and operate, expand garden. Potential to be larger neighborhood Park - Planning and acquisition included in City Center Neighborhood Park 1. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 13 30,000$ 40,000$ 49,000$ 80,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$ 5 Tonkin Park Redevelop per Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. 10 183,000$ 245,000$ 298,000$ 485,000$ 1,200$ 5,000$ 6,200$ 6 Veterans Memorial Park Tile refurbishment. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan.8 11,000$ 15,000$ 18,000$ 29,000$ 1,700$ -$ 1,700$ 7 Maplewood Roadside Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan.7 54,000$ 72,000$ 88,000$ 143,000$ 8,100$ -$ 8,100$ 8 Sit In Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. Included in Downtown Civic Core.3 25,000$ 34,000$ 41,000$ 67,000$ 3,700$ -$ 3,700$ Subtotal Special Use Parks 6,093,000$ 8,166,000$ 9,927,000$ 16,169,000$ 1,580,200$ 8,000$ 1,588,200$ Natural Areas 1 May Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor, install soft surface trail, trailhead(s), creek crossings and partner with Newcastle and King County. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. 28 5,700,000$ 7,639,000$ 9,285,000$ 15,124,000$ 22,100$ 4,900$ 27,000$ 2 Black River Riparian Forest Develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, complete site inventory/management plan, implement management plan. Location of Lake to Sound Trail constructed and maintained by King County (shown as regional trail connection on the concept plan). Site is in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Management Plan and the Black River Water Quality Management Plan. 26 7,862,000$ 10,536,000$ 12,807,000$ 20,861,000$ 46,700$ 600,000$ 646,700$ 3 Cedar River Natural Area Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, Cedar River Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 25 3,281,000$ 4,397,000$ 5,345,000$ 8,706,000$ 132,100$ -$ 132,100$ 4 Honey Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Develop soft surface trail. Located in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 23 2,615,000$ 3,504,000$ 4,259,000$ 6,937,000$ 21,500$ -$ 21,500$ 5 Panther Creek/Edlund Property Included in Edlund Property concept plan. Develop a management plan. Acquire land and easements as needed to connect to the Panther Creek Wetlands.21 55,000$ 74,000$ 90,000$ 147,000$ 1,800$ -$ 1,800$ 6 Panther Creek Wetlands Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor. Create pedestrian trails and boardwalk system. Managed by Surface Water Utility.20 4,960,000$ 6,647,000$ 8,079,000$ 13,160,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$ 7 Renton Wetlands Continue to manage as required by Mitigation Banking Agreements. Portion managed by Surface Water Utility. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Plan.18 430,000$ 576,000$ 700,000$ 1,140,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$ 8 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This property may be transferred to the City once Soos Creek Trail is complete.12 -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 9,300$ 44,300$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 9 C.3 - Project List and Cost Model by Park Category RESOLUTION NO. 4398 230 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 231 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-3 By Park Category Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) 9 Lake Street Open Space Potential trailhead. Acquire easements as neccesary to connect to Panther Creek Wetlands.10 3,000$ 4,000$ 5,000$ 8,000$ 200$ -$ 200$ 10 Springbrook Watershed Managed by Water Utility, not accessible to the public. Capital and operations costs are outside of Community Services budget.6 -$ -$ -$ 26,100$ -$ 26,100$ Subtotal Natural Area Parks 24,906,000$ 33,377,000$ 40,570,000$ 66,083,000$ 424,700$ 614,200$ 1,038,900$ Corridors 1 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Construct the planned waterfront trail and park area, connecting the end of the existing water walk at the Cedar River Boathouse to the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.27 6,050,000$ 8,108,000$ 9,855,000$ 16,053,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2 Corridor Acquisition Acquire or secure new properties providing important linkages between parks and natural areas. Included in the City Center Plan and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan.20 6,000,000$ 8,041,000$ 9,774,000$ 15,921,000$ -$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 3 Cedar River Trail Corridor Secure ownership of remaining railbanked corridor land between the trestle bridge and Ron Regis Park, also the remaining corridor near I-405, include acquired land in the surrounding parks and natural areas; maintain corridor as a regional trail linkage. 13 2,903,000$ 3,890,000$ 4,728,000$ 7,701,000$ 35,000$ 25,800$ 60,800$ Subtotal Corridors 14,953,000$ 20,039,000$ 24,357,000$ 39,675,000$ 35,000$ 65,800$ 100,800$ Recreation Facilities (no location identified) 1 Sports Complex Acquire, plan and develop a 4 field (or more) sports complex to centralize competitive play.22 24,050,000$ 32,229,000$ 39,175,000$ 63,812,000$ -$ 282,500$ 282,500$ 2 Non-motorized Boating Facility Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for a non-motorized boating facility. Enhance existing non- motorized boating facility.17 3,250,000$ 4,355,000$ 5,294,000$ 8,623,000$ -$ -$ -$ 3 Community Gardens Acquire land and/or develop additional community gardens through partnerships, potentially as part of new neighborhood or community parks.16 760,000$ 1,018,000$ 1,237,000$ 2,015,000$ -$ 2,300$ 2,300$ 4 Wayfinding and Informational Signage Design and implement wayfinding and park signage throughout the parks, recreation and natural areas system and install information kiosks and trailhead signage at key points in the trail system.15 650,000$ 872,000$ 1,060,000$ 1,727,000$ -$ -$ -$ 5 Dog Parks Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for off-leash areas in four neighborhood or community parks or other locations.13 1,030,000$ 1,381,000$ 1,679,000$ 2,735,000$ 60,000$ 17,500$ 77,500$ 6 Skate Parks Develop new skate park within a community park.9 600,000$ 804,000$ 977,000$ 1,591,000$ -$ -$ -$ Subtotal Facilities 30,340,000$ 40,659,000$ 49,422,000$ 80,503,000$ 60,000$ 302,300$ 362,300$ Trails 1 Trail Expansion & Development Trail connection projects from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan that are connected to parks and natural areas.23 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2 Trailheads and Parking Identify and develop appropriate access points to natural areas.20 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$ Subtotal Trails 100,000$ 134,000$ 162,000$ 264,000$ -$ -$ -$ TOTAL 333,092,000$ 446,372,000$ 542,574,000$ 883,796,000$ 14,056,300$ 6,827,100$ 20,883,400$ Note: Operating Cost totals remove double counting of replaced facilities. Totals do not include improvements to School District facilities that may result from new partnership opportunities. * Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines **Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities. Renton_Cost_Model_010720 10 C.3 - Project List and Cost Model by Park Category RESOLUTION NO. 4398 232 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 233 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-4 By CPA Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) Benson Community Planning Area 1 Tiffany Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Expand to connect to Cascade Park. Potentially repurpose and expand neighborhood building for environmental learning as shown on concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 25 4,372,000$ 5,859,000$ 7,122,000$ 11,601,000$ 110,300$ -$ 110,300$ 2 Parkwood South Div #3 Park*Acquire adjacent land to bring this site up to minimum size of 2 acres of developable land; master plan and develop a neighborhood park according to design guidelines.16 448,000$ 601,000$ 731,000$ 1,191,000$ 4,300$ 200$ 4,500$ 3 Cascade Park Renovate according to design guildelines using the concept plan as a reference. Expand park to connect Cascade Park to Tiffany Park, improve road access and increase visibility. Potential for off leash area within park. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 15 6,161,000$ 8,256,000$ 10,035,000$ 16,346,000$ 83,300$ 69,500$ 152,800$ 4 Benson Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park east of S Benson Rd and north of SE Puget Drive.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 4 Benson Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop one neighborhood park west of SR 515 around SE 192nd Street.14 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 4 SE 186th Place Properties*Undersized and surrounded by private property; potential for community garden, tree nursery or play area to serve local residents. If not used for neighborhood park functions, replace with an additional park east of SR 515. 14 1,250,000$ 1,675,000$ 2,036,000$ 3,316,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$ 4 Soos Creek Greenway: Boulevard Lane A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This neighborhood park may be transferred to the City and rennovated. This park includes a substantial natural area.14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 227,300$ 227,300$ 5 Soos Creek Greenway: Renton Park A portion of the King County owned Soos Creek Greenway, within the Renton City Limits. This property may be transferred to the City once Soos Creek Trail is complete.12 -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 9,300$ 44,300$ Subtotal Benson Community Planning Area 25,907,000$ 34,717,000$ 42,200,000$ 68,740,000$ 237,400$ 511,300$ 748,700$ Cedar River Community Planning Area 1 N.A.R.CO Property Develop according to design guidelines and Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan to include artificial turf soccer fields, relocated trail, parking, picnic facilities, play area, restrooms, bike park/bmx/pump track and climbing wall. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 33 23,646,000$ 31,688,000$ 38,517,000$ 62,740,000$ 289,200$ 170,000$ 459,200$ 2 Cedar River Park Existing major building facilities include RCC and Carco Theatre. Enclose lap pool at Henry Moses Aquatic Center, potential field reconfiguration. Redevelop elements as shown on the revised Riverside: Tri Park Concept Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Also included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 29 16,248,000$ 21,774,000$ 26,466,000$ 43,110,000$ 4,529,200$ 1,000,000$ 5,529,200$ 3 Ron Regis Park Improve existing and undeveloped fields (with natural turf); extend water service to the park; add a permanent restroom, playground, and picnic area(s). Park included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Potential for habitat improvements to stabilize shoreline. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 10,343,000$ 13,861,000$ 16,848,000$ 27,444,000$ 656,100$ 85,000$ 741,100$ 4 Cedar River Natural Area Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, Cedar River Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 25 3,281,000$ 4,397,000$ 5,345,000$ 8,706,000$ 132,100$ -$ 132,100$ 5 Maplewood Golf Course Continue to maintain and operate, acquire property as it becomes available. See adopted Master Plan, included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital and operations costs are outside of the Community Services budget, within an enterprise fund. Capital Improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6 Cedar River Trail Corridor Secure ownership of remaining railbanked corridor land between the trestle bridge and Ron Regis Park, also the remaining corridor near I-405, include acquired land in the surrounding parks and natural areas; maintain corridor as a regional trail linkage. 13 2,903,000$ 3,890,000$ 4,728,000$ 7,701,000$ 35,000$ 25,800$ 60,800$ 7 Riverview Park Park in Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.11 465,000$ 623,000$ 757,000$ 1,233,000$ 133,000$ -$ 133,000$ 8 Maplewood Park Renovate or remove restrooms. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.8 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 44,900$ -$ 44,900$ 9 Maplewood Roadside Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan.7 54,000$ 72,000$ 88,000$ 143,000$ 8,100$ -$ 8,100$ Subtotal Cedar River Community Planning Area 57,513,000$ 77,073,000$ 93,683,000$ 152,598,000$ 5,827,600$ 1,280,800$ 7,108,400$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 11 C.4 - Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area RESOLUTION NO. 4398 234 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 235 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODELTable_C-4 By CPA Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) City Center Community Planning Area 1 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Construct the planned waterfront trail and park area, connecting the end of the existing water walk at the Cedar River Boathouse to the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park.27 6,050,000$ 8,108,000$ 9,855,000$ 16,053,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2 Liberty Park Re-develop according to design standards and the Riverside: Tri-Park Concept Plan. Improve ballfields in the short term (for example levelling). Repurpose Community Building for environmental learning. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 7,825,000$ 10,486,000$ 12,746,000$ 20,762,000$ 252,200$ 600,000$ 852,200$ 2 Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Maintain and enhance facility for non-motorized boating, acquire land for additional parking, expand technology, renovate S. beach restrooms & bathhouse. Replace parking lots, irrigation, swim beach promenade and rosewall/bulkhead. High level of ongoing reinvestment due to intensive use. Planned park bond improvements include multiple major replacement projects. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 26 7,824,000$ 10,485,000$ 12,745,000$ 20,760,000$ 1,002,000$ 15,000$ 1,017,000$ 2 Piazza, Gateway and former Big 5 site Re-master plan for future park development. Redevelopment of the Piazza Gateway park site and former Big 5 lot should include a plaza and other complementary outdoor spaces allowing activities to extend beyond the existing park, creating a civic center. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and the Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. 26 5,650,000$ 7,572,000$ 9,204,000$ 14,992,000$ 9,000$ 3,000$ 12,000$ 3 Burnett Linear Park*Included in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan and the City Center Plan. Improvements identify expanding park to the north (Renton Connector). Reconfigure existing parking lot between 4th and 5th. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 23 885,000$ 1,187,000$ 1,443,000$ 2,350,000$ 8,300$ 6,700$ 15,000$ 4 Boeing EIS Waterfront Park A new park with lakefront access as noted in the Boeing Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS dated 10/21/03.22 19,350,000$ 25,931,000$ 31,519,000$ 51,341,000$ -$ 1,125,000$ 1,125,000$ 5 Cedar River Trail Park Invasive species removal, add utilities for Cedar River Boathouse. Included in City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Planned connection to future Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 21 2,039,000$ 2,732,000$ 3,321,000$ 5,410,000$ 221,200$ -$ 221,200$ 6 Philip Arnold Park Potential partnership with neighboring landowner (currently Puget Sound Energy) to enhance usability and access. Improve ballfield and multipurpose field. Renovate or remove neighborhood building and restrooms. Included in the City Center Plan. Planned park bond improvements include: relocate playground, improve ADA accessibility, refurbish picnic areas, refurbish basketball court surround, refurbish parking lot, add lighting and a loop trail. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 20 4,179,000$ 5,600,000$ 6,807,000$ 11,088,000$ 183,300$ 5,000$ 188,300$ 6 Senior Activity Center Property Potentially expand for multi-generational center. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.20 140,000$ 188,000$ 229,000$ 373,000$ 1,552,000$ -$ 1,552,000$ 7 City Center Neighborhood Park 1 Develop neighborhood park amenities at existing Senior Activity Center site after phasing out existing maintenance buildings, which will require acquisition of a new site. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 19 5,488,000$ 7,354,000$ 8,939,000$ 14,561,000$ 21,000$ 81,500$ 102,500$ 7 Jones Park Shoreline stabilization. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan and Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Adjacent trail corridor adds enough size to serve as a full neighborhood park. Park in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and Cedar River Basin Plan. 19 1,017,000$ 1,363,000$ 1,657,000$ 2,699,000$ 43,000$ -$ 43,000$ 8 Community Garden/Greenhouse Continue to maintain and operate, expand garden. Potential to be larger neighborhood Park - Planning and acquisition included in City Center Neighborhood Park 1. Included in the City Center Plan, Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8, and the Cedar River Basin Plan. 13 30,000$ 40,000$ 49,000$ 80,000$ 4,500$ -$ 4,500$ 9 Tonkin Park Redevelop per Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. 10 183,000$ 245,000$ 298,000$ 485,000$ 1,200$ 5,000$ 6,200$ 10 Veterans Memorial Park Tile refurbishment. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan.8 11,000$ 15,000$ 18,000$ 29,000$ 1,700$ -$ 1,700$ 11 Sit In Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. Included in the City Center Plan. Included in Downtown Civic Core.3 25,000$ 34,000$ 41,000$ 67,000$ 3,700$ -$ 3,700$ Subtotal City Center Community Planning Area 60,696,000$ 81,340,000$ 98,871,000$ 161,050,000$ 3,303,100$ 1,841,200$ 5,144,300$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 12 C.4 - Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area RESOLUTION NO. 4398 236 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 237 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL C.4 - Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area Table_C-4 By CPA Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) East Plateau Community Planning Area 1 May Creek Park Develop park according to design guidelines (parking, picnic, play area, hard surface court, open turf area, restrooms, trail connections) using concept plan as a reference, create/implement management plan addressing wetlands. Potential acquisition to increase park usability. 27 9,830,000$ 13,173,000$ 16,012,000$ 26,082,000$ 124,500$ 65,500$ 190,000$ 2 East Plateau Community Park Acquire site from King County and re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.17 14,675,000$ 19,666,000$ 23,904,000$ 38,937,000$ -$ 605,000$ 605,000$ 3 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of Sunset Boulevard and east of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 3 East Plateau Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of SE 128th Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ Subtotal East Plateau Community Planning Area 38,181,000$ 51,165,000$ 62,192,000$ 101,305,000$ 124,500$ 875,500$ 1,000,000$ Highlands Community Planning Area 1 Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Re-develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Existing property is inefficient as configured. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 27 15,400,000$ 20,637,000$ 25,084,000$ 40,859,000$ 1,710,600$ 60,000$ 1,770,600$ 2 North Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center Re-master plan park and redevelop neighborhood building for multi-generational use. Potential for partnerships. Located within the larger Sunset Planned Action EIS area. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 25 2,673,000$ 3,582,000$ 4,354,000$ 7,092,000$ 1,550,500$ -$ 1,550,500$ 3 Honey Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, implement management plan. Develop soft surface trail. Located in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. Continue to acquire properties as they become available. 23 2,615,000$ 3,504,000$ 4,259,000$ 6,937,000$ 21,500$ -$ 21,500$ 4 Kiwanis Park Potential acquisition to expand park to increase usability. Bond improvements include: improving field and installing ADA access from Union Avenue, renovating or removing neighborhood building, replacing playground and renovating hard surface courts and parking, and adding picnic plaza. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 19 2,838,000$ 3,803,000$ 4,623,000$ 7,530,000$ 127,500$ 5,000$ 132,500$ 4 Sunset Neighborhood Park Final phase contruction to be completed in 2020. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 200,000$ 268,000$ 326,000$ 531,000$ 64,000$ -$ 64,000$ 5 Windsor Hills Park Potential acquisitions to enhance park usability and visibility from street. Redevelop according to design guideline and concept plan. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.14 3,635,000$ 4,871,000$ 5,921,000$ 9,645,000$ 34,800$ 16,400$ 51,200$ 6 Highlands Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park north of Sunset Boulevard, west of Duvall.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 6 Highlands Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park south of NE 3rd Street.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 7 Glencoe Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 31,000$ 42,000$ 51,000$ 83,000$ 3,800$ -$ 3,800$ 7 Heritage Park Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.7 573,000$ 768,000$ 934,000$ 1,521,000$ 133,800$ -$ 133,800$ Subtotal Highlands Community Planning Area 41,641,000$ 55,801,000$ 67,828,000$ 110,484,000$ 3,646,500$ 286,400$ 3,932,900$ Kennydale Community Planning Area 1 May Creek Greenway Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor, install soft surface trail, trailhead(s), creek crossings and partner with Newcastle and King County. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 8 and the May Creek Basin Plan. 28 5,700,000$ 7,639,000$ 9,285,000$ 15,124,000$ 22,100$ 4,900$ 27,000$ 2 Kenyon Dobson Park Develop interpretive/education center, trailhead, parking, restrooms.24 3,725,000$ 4,992,000$ 6,068,000$ 9,884,000$ 14,300$ 600,000$ 614,300$ 3 Kennydale Lions Park Renovate according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference. Park acreage is not fully developed and current configuration of facilities limits usage. Renovate existing neighborhood building. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 17 2,994,000$ 4,012,000$ 4,877,000$ 7,944,000$ 41,300$ 40,000$ 81,300$ 4 Kennydale Beach Park*Reconfigure dock for improved life guarding, renovate restroom/lifeguard facility. Acquire land to enhance usability. Park included in the Shoreline Master Program and WRIA 8, Eastrail is located adjacent to the East park boundary. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 15 896,000$ 1,201,000$ 1,460,000$ 2,378,000$ 85,600$ 5,300$ 90,900$ 5 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 1 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park west of I-405.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ 5 Kennydale Neighborhood Park 2 Acquire and develop a neighborhood park east of I-405 and north of the May Creek Greenway.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ Subtotal Kennydale Community Planning Area 26,991,000$ 36,170,000$ 43,966,000$ 71,616,000$ 163,300$ 855,200$ 1,018,500$ Renton_Cost_Model_010720 13 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 238 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 239 APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL C.4 - Project List and Cost Model by Community Planning Area Table_C-4 By CPA Priority #Project Project Description Total Score Total Capital Cost Total Capital Cost Projection 5 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 10 Years Total Capital Cost Projection 20 Years Total Existing Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Proposed Annual Operating Cost (2019 Dollars) Total Operating Cost (Existing + Proposed 2019 Dollars) Talbot Community Planning Area 1 Cleveland Richardson Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement management plan. 25 10,537,000$ 14,120,000$ 17,163,000$ 27,957,000$ 178,500$ 65,000$ 243,500$ 2 Edlund Property Develop park according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, create and implement management plan addressing wetland. Continue acquistions to make connection to the Panther Creek Wetland. 24 10,739,000$ 14,391,000$ 17,492,000$ 28,493,000$ 133,100$ 66,900$ 200,000$ 3 Panther Creek/Edlund Property Included in Edlund Property concept plan. Develop a management plan. Acquire land and easements as needed to connect to the Panther Creek Wetlands.21 55,000$ 74,000$ 90,000$ 147,000$ 1,800$ -$ 1,800$ 4 Panther Creek Wetlands Complete site inventory and management plan, acquire additional land along creek corridor. Create pedestrian trails and boardwalk system. Managed by Surface Water Utility.20 4,960,000$ 6,647,000$ 8,079,000$ 13,160,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$ 5 Thomas Teasdale Park Improve outfield drainage. Potential re-purpose of neighborhood building. Renovate existing ballfield to create all-abilities ballfield. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.19 3,420,000$ 4,583,000$ 5,571,000$ 9,075,000$ 137,500$ -$ 137,500$ 6 Talbot Hill Reservoir Park Renovate site with features that differentiate it from nearby Thomas Teasedale Park. Potentially add loop walk and picnic area. Refurbish tennis and pickleball courts. Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed. 14 673,000$ 902,000$ 1,096,000$ 1,785,000$ 19,500$ -$ 19,500$ 7 Lake Street Open Space Potential trailhead. Acquire easements as neccesary to connect to Panther Creek Wetlands.10 3,000$ 4,000$ 5,000$ 8,000$ 200$ -$ 200$ 8 Springbrook Watershed Managed by Water Utility, not accessible to the public. Capital and operations costs are outside of Community Services budget.6 -$ -$ -$ 26,100$ -$ 26,100$ Subtotal Talbot Community Planning Area 30,387,000$ 40,721,000$ 49,496,000$ 80,625,000$ 566,300$ 131,900$ 698,200$ Valley Community Planning Area 1 Black River Riparian Forest Develop according to design guidelines using concept plan as a reference, complete site inventory/management plan, implement management plan. Location of Lake to Sound Trail constructed and maintained by King County (shown as regional trail connection on the concept plan). Site is in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Management Plan and the Black River Water Quality Management Plan. 26 7,862,000$ 10,536,000$ 12,807,000$ 20,861,000$ 46,700$ 600,000$ 646,700$ 2 Renton Wetlands Continue to manage as required by Mitigation Banking Agreements. Portion managed by Surface Water Utility. Included in the Shoreline Master Program, WRIA 9, Green/Duwamish Watershed Plan.18 430,000$ 576,000$ 700,000$ 1,140,000$ 69,600$ -$ 69,600$ Subtotal Valley Community Planning Area 8,292,000$ 11,112,000$ 13,507,000$ 22,001,000$ 116,300$ 600,000$ 716,300$ West Hill Community Planning Area 1 Earlington Park*Capital improvements and major maintenance as needed.15 206,000$ 276,000$ 335,000$ 546,000$ 11,300$ -$ 11,300$ 2 West Hills Neighborhood Park Acquire and develop one neighborhood park north of Renton Avenue.13 6,838,000$ 9,163,000$ 11,138,000$ 18,143,000$ -$ 102,500$ 102,500$ Subtotal West Hill Community Planning Area 7,044,000$ 9,439,000$ 11,473,000$ 18,689,000$ 11,300$ 102,500$ 113,800$ Multiple or No Specified Community Planning Area 1 Trail Expansion & Development Trail connection projects from the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan that are connected to parks and natural areas.23 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$ 2 Sports Complex Acquire, plan and develop a 4 field (or more) sports complex to centralize competitive play.22 24,050,000$ 32,229,000$ 39,175,000$ 63,812,000$ -$ 282,500$ 282,500$ 3 Corridor Acquisition Acquire or secure new properties providing important linkages between parks and natural areas. Included in the City Center Plan and the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan.20 6,000,000$ 8,041,000$ 9,774,000$ 15,921,000$ -$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 3 Trailheads and Parking Identify and develop appropriate access points to natural areas.20 50,000$ 67,000$ 81,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$ 4 Non-motorized Boating Facility Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for a non-motorized boating facility. Enhance existing non- motorized boating facility.17 3,250,000$ 4,355,000$ 5,294,000$ 8,623,000$ -$ -$ -$ 5 Community Gardens Acquire land and/or develop additional community gardens through partnerships, potentially as part of new neighborhood or community parks.16 760,000$ 1,018,000$ 1,237,000$ 2,015,000$ -$ 2,300$ 2,300$ 6 Wayfinding and Informational Signage Design and implement wayfinding and park signage throughout the parks, recreation and natural areas system and install information kiosks and trailhead signage at key points in the trail system.15 650,000$ 872,000$ 1,060,000$ 1,727,000$ -$ -$ -$ 7 Dog Parks Acquire land, develop and/or develop partnerships for off-leash areas in four neighborhood or community parks or other locations.13 1,030,000$ 1,381,000$ 1,679,000$ 2,735,000$ 60,000$ 17,500$ 77,500$ 8 Skate Parks Develop new skate park within a community park.9 600,000$ 804,000$ 977,000$ 1,591,000$ -$ -$ -$ Subtotal Multiple or No Specified Community Planning Area 36,440,000$ 48,834,000$ 59,358,000$ 96,688,000$ 60,000$ 342,300$ 402,300$ TOTAL 333,092,000$ 446,372,000$ 542,574,000$ 883,796,000$ 14,056,300$ 6,827,100$ 20,883,400$ Note: Operating Cost totals remove double counting of replaced facilities. Totals do not include improvements to School District facilities that may result from new partnership opportunities. * Parks that have been provisionally classified even though they do not meet minimum size or other design guidelines **Boeing EIS Waterfront Park development would only occur if the Boeing Company surplused the Renton facilities. Renton_Cost_Model_010720 14 RESOLUTION NO. 4398 240 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX C: PROJECT LIST AND COST MODEL This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 ¡QUEREMOS ESCUCHAR SUS OPINIONES! Acompáñenos a un taller comunitario interactivo para hablar sobre los parques y las áreas recreativas y naturales en Renton. Cuándo: 28 de febrero de 2019, 6:00 a 8:00 p. m. Dónde: Renton Community Center 1715 SE Maple Valley Hwy * Se servirán pequeños refrigerios. REMAR, JUGAR, IR DE PÍCNIC... Habrá interpretación al español y al vietnamita disponible en el taller. Para programar otro tipo de asistencia, llame con 48 horas de anticipación: 711 (TDD) o 425-430-6600 (voz). ¿CÓMO USA LOS PARQUES DE RENTON? PLAN PARA LOS PARQUES Y LAS ÁREAS RECREATIVAS Y NATURALES Renton www.rentonparksplan.com D CONNECTING WITH THE COMMUNITY APPENDIX RESOLUTION NO. 4398 242 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIx D: CONNECTING WITH THE COMMUNITY MAKING THE CONNECTION The foundation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan is based on community ideas and feedback. With a commitment to engaging Renton’s diverse community members, the 2019 Plan process utilized a variety of communication methods to reach out to the public. Guidance from City staff, committees and community stakeholders also formed the basis for developing the Plan. A summary of this feedback is provided in Chapter 3, Community Involvement. Engagement in Multiple Languages Communications and engagement opportunities for the Plan were provided in three languages, including English, Spanish and Vietnamese. Community open houses and online open houses were advertised in English, Spanish and Vietnamese on social media and through the Renton School District. Translated materials and interpretation were provided at the community open houses, online open houses, inclusive engagement activities and the Community Priority Survey. OUTREACH METHODS • Gov Delivery email list with approximately 20,000 recipients, including committees and commissions • Renton School District Schools Peach Jar • Renton Reporter Calendar, print and digital ads • La Raza print and digital ad • Facebook • Twitter • City Website • Neighborhood Association email list • Next Door • Renton City News • Media Advisory • “Let’s Go Renton” Brochure • Televised Administrative Report to the Renton City Council • eGrapevine Announcement • Byte of Renton Article and Calendar RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 243 APPENDIx D: CONNECTING WITH THE COMMUNITY • Posters and flyers at the following locations: -Renton Library -Fairwood Library -Skyway Library -Highlands Library -Renton Community Center -Highlands Neighborhood Center and North Highlands Neighborhood Center -Renton Senior Activity Center • Distributed by committees • Inclusive engagement strategy (see Chapter 3 for full description) RESOLUTION NO. 4398 244 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIx D: CONNECTING WITH THE COMMUNITYRESOLUTION NO. 4398 E TRAILS MAP APPENDIX RESOLUTION NO. 4398 This page intentionally left blank 246 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIx E: TRAILS MAP RESOLUTION NO. 4398 CITY OF RENTON | PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 247 APPENDIX C: COST MODEL PRIORITIZATION nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(^^^^^^^EN evA maiuqoHTalbot Rd SSEJonesRdSPugetDr WS evA dniLEN evA eornoMEN evA sdnomdES 7th StNewcastle WayES evA ht611S evA ht78WellsAveSES evA ht841ES evA ht821SE 216th StBenson Rd S SE183rdStSW 41st StSE 168th StEN evA noinUSW 7th StLakeWashingtonBlvdSEPuget Dr SESEMayValleyRdSW 34th StdR yellaV tsaESW 27th StE Valley Hwy84th Ave SS 216th StSouthcenterBlvdSE 192nd StS 228th St154thP l SE S 132nd StN 3rd St64th Ave SyaW tserC dnalsIaPkwySE 208th St68th Ave SDuvall Ave NES129thStN 4th StSE 128th StInterurb a n A v e SRainier Ave SES evA ht421NE 4th StRa i n i e r Ave N 4th A v eN Co a l C r e e k P k w y S E S212thWayNE 3rdStEMercerWay140th Ave SEOakesdale AveSWR e nton A v e S NParkDrSW 43rd StSECarrRdBeaconAve S LoganAveNForest Dr SES 212th StSGradyWayN evA kraPES evA dn231ES evA ht651S 124thStES evA ht841Lakemont Blvd SE ES evA ht611S 180th St66th Av e SES evA ht461AirportWaySWGrady WaySE 204th WayWMercerWayMonste rRdSWSEMayValley Rd140thWaySESE Petrovitsky RdNewcastleGolf ClubRd68thAveSS 133rd StUV169UV900UV515UV900UV181UV167¥405¥405¥405273845S 7th StSunsetBlvdNNE 23rd PlNESunsetBlvdSE 160th StNE 6th StNE 19th StN 30th StNE 10th StNE27thStSE 164th StPark Ave NS evA niaMNE 24th StEN evA ohcireJNE 10th StTalbot Rd SNE6thStNE 7th StMontereyAveNE125th Ave SEN 8th StNE 10th StNE 4th StSE 184th StNE9th StBeaconW ay SNE 2nd StRentonAveSN evA nedraGEN evA eliNGrant A v e S SE 164th StES evA ht801HarringtonAve NENE12thStEN evA dnalkriKB e nson DrSSE Petrovitsky RdLa k e W ashingtonBlvd N S dR toblaTBlack RiverRiparianForestCascade ParkCavanaugh PondNatural AreaCedar River Natural AreaCedarRiverParkCedar River toLake SammamishTrail SiteCedar RiverTrailCedar RiverTrail ParkCleveland /RichardsonPropertyCoalfieldParkCougar MountainRegionalWildland ParkEdlundPropertyFort DentFosterGolf CourseFutureSW AthleticComplexGene CoulonMemorial BeachParkGreenRiverTrailHoney CreekGreenwayLakeridgeParkMaplewoodCommunity ParkMaplewoodGolf CourseMaplewoodHeights ParkMayCreek/ McAskillMay CreekGreenwayMayValley CountyParkMcGarveyPark OpenSpaceMetroWaterworkParkNARCOPropertyPanther CreekWetlandsPetrovitskyParkRenton ParkRentonWetlandsRiverview ParkRon RegisParkSkywayParkSoosCreek Park andTrailSpringbrookTrailSpringbrookWatershed11234455667889910101111121213141415151617181919202021222324242425262828293031323334353637394041424344464747484849505152525455565657585960616262636364656566666767676868686970717273747475767777787979806335353 Lake WashingtonExisting TrailsShared Use PathStriped Bike LaneSigned Shared RoadwayPedestrian TrailProposed TrailsShared Use PathProtected Bike LaneStriped Bike LaneNeighborhood GreenwaySigned Shared RoadwayPedestrian TrailParks & Open Space^Community CenterLibraryPotential Transit HubnSchool°00.51 MilesProposed Project Number, Name1, 116th Avenue SE Bike Lanes2, 128th Avenue SE Bike Lanes3, 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes4, Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path5, Benson Neighborhood Greenway6, Benson Road/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes7, Cascade Waterline Spur Trail8, Cedar to Sammamish Trail9, Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lanes10, East Valley Road Shared Use Path11, Eastside Rail Corridor12, Edmonds Avenue Connector13, Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path14, Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway15, Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway16, Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path17, Harrington Ave NE Neighborhood Greenway18, Highlands Hillclimb19, Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway20, Honey Creek Trail Extensions21, Houser Way and Factory Avenue22, Houser Way N Shared Use Path23, Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes24, Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway25, Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway26, Kenyon-Dobson Trail and Trailhead27, Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment28, Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment29, Lake Washington Loop Trail30, Langston Road/SW 134th Street Hillclimb31, Logan Avenue N Shared Use Path32, Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway33, May Creek Hillclimb34, May Creek Trail35, May Valley Trail36, Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway37, Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes38, N 4th Street Connector39, N 6th Street Bike Lanes40, N 8th Street Shared Use Path41, Naches Avenue Shared Use Path42, NE 3rd Street43, NE 4th Street Bike Lanes44, NE 12th Street Bike Lanes45, NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway46, NE Sunset Blvd Shared Use Path47, Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes48, North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway49, North Southport Drive Shared Use Path50, Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes51, Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail52, Panther Creek Trail53, Powerline Trail54, Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway55, Renton Connector56, Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway57, S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lanes58, S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway59, S/SW 7th Street Transit Connector60, Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail61, SE 168th Street Protected Bike Lanes62, SE 182nd & 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway63, SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path64, Seattle Waterline Spur Trail65, Seattle Waterline Trail66, Shattuck to Airport Connector67, Soos Creek Trail68, South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway69, Springbrook Trail70, Springbrook Trail Extension71, Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb72, SW 16th Street Shared Use Path73, SW 27th Street Connector74, Talbot Road S Bike Lanes75, Thunder Creek Trail76, Tiffany-Cascade Connector Trail77, Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway78, Tukwila Station Trail79, Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes80, Wells Avenue S Signed Shared RoadwayHighest Priorty ProjectExis�ng & Proposed Network and Project MapRenton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan 2019RESOLUTION NO. 4398 APPENDIX E: TRAILS MAP 248 | CITY OF RENTON This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 F ADOPTING RESOLUTION APPENDIX RESOLUTION NO. 4398 250 | CITY OF RENTON APPENDIx F: ADOPTING RESOLUTION This page intentionally left blank RESOLUTION NO. 4398 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN | 251 APPENDIx F: ADOPTING RESOLUTION Placeholder for Adopting Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 4398 252 | CITY OF RENTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RESOLUTION NO. 4398