Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-024 , . " -4 -%-„...rio,, #31,.tc, \.\ ‘61i'llti[iS. ii .--.::::',' , 1 ,-, _____ LL..1 , ..., . , * '.______zu.oic*. (41 2 0., -:---it,r45TH- --..0 w t 5911.11._,. ,r.?.... .4° 4ip 0,5 041-Edr, N I •'..- ' (,),0t ' 13) - 1 1 0..r.,4''', 0 4, --'.,• 41111441S. "\ 1" • . s 7 l?JO ...---J .. • 4••,) IIIP I—:11W 1 ' I i.,•=, •,,,, 030414.,415 \ .t. • - •••,• ' ,?'---4.4.....-, c . '4-V/0„. 47/.5. • , ._ M I nE(4) 0 fLa,''' l',..„-"•••••. MO L ' 7 0 ... • .1/4--••••.„„. ''.°• i 't4 •••:-. - F Be.0 1.1. . (2) .. xs" i C Patten t•- ,116 "".4. r , ''''N\NN ,, . '''''''Dt ..,,,, . s, 4. 11'4 "Ms. °?!4,56 $ ; I ..........."1.' t,... -41 C A.' 'I •tt ,.Aal s. 1 r,,-,.1•4' -'-' • 0 ,.. . I ALL( .0.• 4N It ‘ZN..1 . ii i - iisk . 61 1; • 5 I..• TO "el ft or nee!), so .044 19 - cir.4 (01 la (Th I ir?-. ._•7•. -.1:_.....r-_ _,4;r,. ,_47".;.;.;.-7:,;•-•4;.14+.#.2 --•=4.1=.--,„:!' '' ''. AL ota• ,,,,4—-le t.,„, ,,„71,r --,1—_,I V 0A.el z ,r„13,, „ --AJ ./ 'sz I •1', 7 , !n Se03.-81 40 . ... Ijst -4--I• 5'770 41 t•3' .'•;. -./e 4 PL. . 1 III 2 ' V, Stanley 8 De Long LI 11' v,..• T• --1, - 2,,,s,, •!,4P .•, ! ..,,•,.,•• • ,12,*1),k 1)-u!) • Frip•.7.! I I i 6 S3AtZ t,, 1. Nk II11 CT. &,‘.1 wil ..._ -— 8 e ,s,- • :11.1B •x ,F4. -I .. -,,.. e,.....- . —ir _ , 11 '16 . " %.11 4 „ 0!isi ST;a,,.,. .i..-0 milk•se, , c„•c• 0 <, 50 , k tai % IN VI. 1••••,.'q. • VA ' a N•E• • e ' L. . 40;',Z . .:2.A..a." E Y - - • < ..-17-7,Tylrl .dr t .,„ , r" II lb e I v " -kne_.4 414-sk . ;: ftl - -c-- . •, .:.,s 13 1• • '.0!.11 .:f".4 hi ti . 7.' I .; ..__ 'Z' ..e.O. elvt.. _ ../m.:',.... \.. ;y p CITY OF RENTON ""�-�1 , 2,, ��` ' U) . 4,,A T t40 e�«,eta✓ 4.. ....... y ••LL Planning/Building/Public Works 1- J -tor-, 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 T t MAY 13'9 i I } : 0 „3 D 5 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED r4 � : "i.7 " 4) irk Gregory Paddock 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E103 Renton, WA 98056 X i _ ,�� 1.:� �� `../ i VI l it I f_..f�J-t'f fJ� Aviit � ti .. .Ji <l_ ._=C�G-- 61 WQ �: !j y } } y t ii y j f j yy „i� � �'{ �' �� � A '3 fl :Ain'? Via, re,-4 ii,,h,1tlil1114,,:hi ltliftl113,1111II1,„11'3111111tlt„11,1 _,,,., ,. ,, �" l it l lnl l 11 s 111 l 0 0 CITY OF RENTON '• .....;,,, 4.0<-7-.7914.7.7y, -___--=_,..,- ea Planning/Building/Public Works ,44 ca 0 MAY 5'9 ,...?.:4,0;A - 5 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 1 5 . I II ]•3 0 Ct. .... PB METER ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED iti 1 4.. t f r Richard&Marie Valdrighi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D106 Renton,WA 98056 i-: I!._ -:1 ! <-2:-. :_: .__._,,.,,,_ c--,.0 I ''1 s;i . <.'. .;-;:,,,. ) IAD DI7.,'..-lr_r: —.7.1._ _ a) ) ,.--, !Li '':K N 0‘A'N \,,,t__Iilt4 Q., '7 ltryfet‘72,'.4.:'.• `..e.. Illistittilihttillitillissinattittitillsilitiliitdilittilil .., _ .. „ p CITY OF RENTON �A r 1�'" -�'� = . t.0 Planning/Building/Public Works I, ,. ; 4r Mktta!a* ? * - 0305 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 t ti ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED IIP 4.4 9-9 1 • IOng. (i,. _T• titi �(Q�J lJ Mary Catherine White 3 800 NE Sunset Blvd#C 101 Q Renton, WA 98056 �” r� :a i�d� �" G 5 ITO( Y e1F R IIE-1 ' ,_ 4 co Aol .:Il ArprI 1:::3 JET C�J i {{ ii ii 1 ss ++ `` ]j (( yy j i1 f j y S { }y i li!'`i< 0 l�'♦ a'�J 34 i4� �r J �51�l: lslll�!!lilt�lliilt!!1ll1 iititttl�!!f{1flflfiffll!!llilflflttlllllliff� a © CITY OF RENTON �OA t l .di Planning/Building/Public Works 1 ':r ', 0 a ntiY I 3'9 8 tip, - 0 .3 a 5 ; 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055cc r — ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED James Volk 4000 NE 12`h St Renton, WA 98056 Ot/ °` - � �� � ,,_ 0,. Nd " s%W i��.2.7a� 111 i 11llilt II I Iik1 111111 1 Iiii{iilitmliiitiiitiniliiiiiiiiiiiiiiilMr ----- __-- — ----1 4/ 3-1t�" © CITY OF RENTON • - 41`-�= ,! _;� ' \/ W *�A lG srr y WI. Planning/Building/Public Works J �fir r' a t 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 t 4'3 „AT I ` ' : 0 3 0 5 a g PB METER ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED /[?�d1b PS.` T�11 x Lisa Schroeppel 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D102 Renton,WA 98056 � I i — — �J C.i Is t �_ 0 Or li t 1 h419 _T 0 lAi.Thrl `:SE 'L �QrT wits% . ' l�tl'i1J 11 411 �It�i�ll11� 1I]i` !'fi llI11t1t 1}111j il`11l}i}lff tr 111!! 1� I, OWN _ _ _^ a p CITY OF RENTON • ~!.�,,�L _.! y ma. Planning/Building/Public Works 4 �' � ec � ,< t r; Q 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 te 3 0 5 o MATI3'9t w lea ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED i S1 I 11- r C - III i 3 S E t- R, James&Wendy Allen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E104 Renton, WA 98056 1:3 ,.4 �.a T 1L1+` "_ i _ II ;;*'.+``N 0 VI N a I i S(...".4..3 G Iitiiillflttltlt r illtltlitlilllilt1ttlifti}ifilfltt1t141tI111 0 W N p cc S . 25E7---- _ : k (A) I:get, ,- , es r 1 1 A ONDO I' Zt./!2 - 1.`JJ Il• ? ! : .110 H -3t/3 O.59Ac2 / /`J �,-'J\i� � ll ''/ -,� J 2 ~ ISO' o I 113100=cj II J64 113.65!6 • //" e \1 03`"1 S '� I ,_ a 11 r Q 1 J �� -0,,- \ m 0.50 Ac. 1 N /4460 -/4.so0 `N O 1 1eir 1 O In_ f / ) 7(-- \7 0 1 ' Myl si� 7���1 / 11 f i , OA, 7'.t.62 c" - r l 7 /CAL. � 5 B p \' 1, 2s (4) 0 rw/`' ' �4 I- I 5 /7 1 / 1 --7i7.77 " ��f.1.Izb - 34003 I- oo� O l I 1 h YET Ap IO, 235.03 �� F P, -o�� O/- .t./04 HOS. 1d09 0 I �J 1 Ci `" 1 ��(�T (I) --, ,aA eA \ o, F f20 ti S.P. I16-80 Lit r N� ,() •-\ r I ` O 4 Ate_ - % C 1 Calvin C. Patten °� I 1 ��,� 1 I O.: Fsr' 20 1 1 ll ,rs �1 a a e so 771.67 ,45 s/�o (3) 1 .:c 0.54Ac. 0.91Ac. 0.75Ac. 0.92Ac. , iip ,,, __,-.,-.,--:5 '-z--.... -. I N*3 ` NE 7.[.99 rt./O/ r.[.iosi • 1-11 1 3 8 o-�\t $ 8 1 C__,h ��96a�, 0 53 , . 11 ej n// Hh �\J• a° 1 I h L'6j Os \ Z45q5 d I I /?o O.ZO t` / bo ,ti, Z' s I I _ T ifs;\\, • 91 2,4 m z A r t h u 0Fzi 7[. 47 I o 9 134 1GN o ^o as 1 g� �` o il 0 , �y > \180 Q o Bea 0, N ~ n at so s?.o9 /J2± i � irR' m� 1.35Ac.92.86" 112.84: 90 /60.04 4 - 01 2 `• ... - •'t:.�r,+ti,t:.i. :%.; c�ti 134 -: I00 ..�,r>- 234 36 60 7 '-I •ti N46 07.04 13o..04- .i-q? --//9-- b �_ 304.91- - -'-0-7-:-.b7 o=- T 0•� � . r�H 60 ,II ^'S0 RA v. y 20 U�'iI/TK r d!�331 30 ....77, - _ .n _ ---fc-- Up 4, 109. 9 u, 96.72 ^ I I "•4� 4° • NI 68 2 w f4h5� o(;I gi . 1 1 i ) - (2) 3 ' 0 Mill /09.-0 H i o S.P 03 81 4o K • " 108.8 •� / •'T•�, 55 6772 n 90 I 299,81 29ZS9 O N /0 a,29 .A 6 N W IZ1•' �� +7B3f 78 4/72 N 1 12:1 - Z ` oll 4 j (® 9 F'^ 1 1 , \ A CONDO N 28 27 , q� �i SO r /20 W� , ., Sta I I _-____ - ®O 66.30 00 W ^°n6 o I n ey B. De Lone J « 562 0 I/6. 0" Z �' 2 111$ Z L - Ill G .1zs.2 • v r(n a•2 r: ._ -/27 7: 56 a +I I H O� 110 5J` _ NE. 11 H CT. a Q h II gg a l 6.53Ac. o a rn ,❑i6 7 �'g ' �. 3 f" I Q II 0 1• 13 5.3.30 a ,o w 1 `� r j066 zo.Tr „Ilo3 �. I -132 - 147 - U�'1 o "'i a0 ow _ lrl oy Lar, 6 10 uncnv g 8811-E T 88----1'--75--T r--7 - 11 h0 0 11 l 8 „ ', t• o a1 O 16 W O 1,'lJ� o ;`'A ] 10 I I 12 13 Fr 0 2 3 3466 `a 1 ^' p °� I l 80 l/4.6/ //7. °' �i/�P0 8 w ..' O_ O o o o 3 Z 19 \ ,0 54 = V 23.3= 1 = B I 0 3�39 3� v1- 5 - j - 11 - r�� r Il 9 sse, s/ 0.94 4 - P I W 9 ` 'z0 `• ' l • 3� .a 6 I Q y Q1���J �, I A 63 i .3.2/ y'' ^ Pp iTIT 9.47 13 �14 :� ��I65 e �^ �ti �f �` tY 9 ' 1" S nC 65 70 1� + N. IITH 11 ? 23 h 0 1 N I 1�A 70 Q g0 0 'S 1. 3 �� y^ , �! �\ ,( 98 70 7 '�% -^'\ „ kk1 0 �• 3• s, T t w .� \' ya 0 70 70 1 61 0 56.: 70.02 63 5� 65.9 i 1 32.8/8 62�95 4498'�,;,ili �� o o Fo [J71 y\.10 Q 1 50 N D p? '' N•E• e. a 319' o b0� ca 0 '- Y jBo 77] ar �e�� 9 - 18 �p1 92.41 o SG • a c 99Y II 9085 I 6 / 2 4, • O 1 e :7.79 .1 a 1 61 rn�• 92.40 ( 5 158 7 90 f j 73 ^i S 7/ O 10 .-9 , 114.1 1�n 90 1 5V• v� I o h 99 0 ...m..'.1: S 0106') I o o •`�� �o // '� "45? (\y��c 11`.. �° 1071 I /10.29�JB I [LJ`a � r o 00 ,/ N, ` �0\\ 02 3qle 3\ �y I3 889 �:I ti' s o, "' Mg •1 Q + W ^ e ,..�' s a 1 095.68 y //6z6 �5 m 3 9 �eA 4),, ,41_,,ac.,ipu,,..0, LJ� 4.7 !!! d _ 1 �� 4D l 5 'u 01.72 9 nZ `° .N1 * .. 71- ! 1. �Z9.lo °D c-1 r I �'^ o N• • 6 I s 61 S.Is7 5 , 1� T. • a 3 ..,k059 tit a' 23 17 16 IS 14 •35 11�34 33 32'e (il SITE R*ORMAT1ON 40 Z01aDN N uCMN1 ME: C-.CFNIED ON91lQ 0OD i l i ll i SITE.EA: 2.996a1 NFJ MST IC IIPERNOITS SITRFCSIG: 1,703&6.8% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 22.513 90.9% ���[[[ NEW DC ELOPELFM ON SITE: 27.9020 96.0% =L NEW PANIC: IMOSCAPMG: if/4 16,]fa T].91( ON-SIZE: 13890 NORTH NAM.VEGETATION: 9640 f i4 Off-SIR: NNW >o TO 0 b PROPOSED EARLOW6: 4,14511fr ULM rANIMASN: 3,2470 Is 1 W ® DETAIL SHOP: afar III Ff/•367 2.E Pk SCAT r.2ro REQUIRED SETTACN: 10'0•W.150 1NX.(FRONT) PROPOSED SETBACK: WO'(raw) PARKNC: 9 STANDARD STALLS 3 Y I VACWN STATIONS 6 I LEGAL DESO(PTION i 111���pppEEE 3 • \ I TAX PMCF1 W. W2-]115-9003 K h n ITINT PORTION a TOE WEST 259.17 FEET a TIE EAST 269.17 I• )I FEET a 11E SOUTHEAST OUARFR a 11E SOU111FA, DINKIER R ow.wO a gcna 4,To1W1sNo 23 SO 5 RANGE 5 FAST,W Y.,w t /(�Tw-N-.., - �ie�ivlm I ^ e 10X1 COUNTY.wLLeM:TON.CMG MORTIEALT OF SOUTHEAST RENTON-15540UAN ROAD: R1 f -_� .- /TA.Ir s_IIA'n•�:c3:7 Z EXCEPT THE NORTH AO FEET TERM: /_ 1 > _ 1� 0 j AL50 EXCPT THE SOUTH]1]PELT.N 222060 MWG THE t! A - �TO IX �-R �) 1 I : - � lb 1 1..•., Q LEGEND�� 1 _n, - P'-R' K-t T,,._..J 1C-4. �-6• 1-s I I o Z AREA wen ® WC.VAULT LIRE HYDRANT O 11OlFT POLE db NARK vALK ■ IIGFIIC SIf1Nl VAULT �T �( I \ i© ap 1 I I •r— I W z a RATER METER (-4 QR FOIE IA :T• _J ' ? _ W 6 SEVER HARHOLF O POWER POLE I . n—! —— '.W YI r — i i p V tI o -i�i i o s.oRH ' ♦ POWERPalw/DGP Z1 `•" � = ; [ Jt lq1 W . NA,mUNANHO E/ r' R iw 1 o I _ tnP.a n,s \ —�_ .� I VICINITY AMP f j 1 r� I 1 Y cREEK I 1 . I SITE !11 / It 1--E AIM i TtleliD SW Ala 1 9am� Iiiv 1 e ,. 1 SI_ A g OP III ,Ay SA A P.li S Si a=SONISSOOSSX01A=SASNEW41%.. ( % d 6==0 I MN= i - 11 i , II 11 impt II il 1 , 11 1... - II tr....1—_,...-_____4_,.0_4-0..—1 IA v6 0_ °IC I DETAIL SHOP FLOOR RAN SOU ve-r-o• OFFICE ROOK PLAN WALE Ix-v-0" cci'11 I LCOLOR SCFEDIAI <i I , zr, f '''''---# 1,---..-r--i---w-a• .'..—, Z t g LMMJ-4 1 .. 1 ;••• ,r-- i cow. "d 0 = v., 1— PEARL WHIll 7.,'1' 1 BURGVNDI .7 4 i tam wawa rRIA.E5 TO BF AANC0¢07 ALUIMAA ______ — / et Z .:11.4 L- 1 -., 1 t i t 1 T .•4 • —.4 12.11& •--,4"--,-2.:—'._,. fi ••"--", - L...=, 4. litil ----DETAIL SHOP I 7 ... /111t, -1-1. I 'WO.di 1 Z 4 3 1 I 1 1 I 134 4 i________ I 1 I I t i 1 C .7 :5: s.'e - •,. ..--- I i I I I i 1 l 1 I '5' 1 i i„,1-- BD1 CM 1 NORTH ilt SOUTH HEVATION sou ye-E-o• EAST ELEVATION 0...s,.....,......0 scuz ix-r-o* Z'-3•� 20'-8 tfi-9• ,6'-6� 15'-9 6" Ifi-B 16'-9 40 Y Y NORTH t== 11 Hit 14 LIAY Vl LMY V pAY N L LNY ry ES�L1 ENY 56,0 MIN J.oN .x,.i xlN Te,N Y- -• J i i WANDWASH BUILDING LAYOUT SCALE+/6- COLOR SCHEDULE g' CO.« Z •• 1D'-2' 53-0" Z KARL NHI, ■ BURf,UUM F- w,e u.�Iwuc,o NL uccem k,,onrc b Ilandlla�h .. - _._- — —.___.._.-. ul �W i LTJ I oI _ _ r _ _ o o V 1 0 = o N „F., cj 0 m NORTH ELEVATION scut+/ -o' WEST ELEVATION gg 11' so•-0• I m-= 5a-o• - I il3 1 [1 lith I/undlwh V =• ma 11 _ ems- 41 = = - o 4�� �� = = dam_. _._:Y-'_ = o F.:`' — _ .�� ., �- CHU6l00,m. BEET MI OF 1 SOUTH ELEVATION seua+/6•-+'-o" EAST ELEVATION sc LE I/6•-,'-o• �msea.�, PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON • 41 1 Cs-....)] N N/3855 CATCH 9ARI 5 1 Si *i [f RBI 300.2 ( ans� as I+11 N!361.a. `�259 F o- . I I F Ir e• .- sD e D voso•/' „M,a0 a \TeL� \ ppNo\ F IX.NNC.TMD _ 30. ^�SEE SM C2 TOR ROCKFF' � 6 •0.O08S'/' Y s�• -flo•C/01 ILM-Ma1i iC .. v ,� K '� IN N■ O9.F f V SEWER CATLIN EMON SL RM 390ET.D'ESNFDTOBE J A jJCSSS.S EXISTING ROWED 391.5 _W�_pW�W __ TIRE IL CB} �- sf - FIN.ROOR 39 20 391.5 l /µ See.0.5 MIN e'3e6.Ov IIII�O� 1 rt W.a TO vAIAT 3ebm � 20� VAULT \ __ a�H 2.a F24 ACCESS IMip1 M/ I ,� W UDDER STEPo �I H ds lF 1We 00.005/'/" � wfr 6 9 a Y r9Z y W 19 �al Q V-WE2R I AG ,,HYPE 1L CB< .IB) 1.5 0 01' n e IW.3et.I I `lU RRA�'� - SHII C2 FOR ROCKERY /—� Z RN 5.96.05 -'44LL380.00 t Z ORMAGE EASEMENT `3R LF-12•IOPT SDS.C.lSa3l8 PAKEL"O" 1 ' — —• `C HONEY CREEK • $ L� w ` \ \ z I o - \ \, co PUBLIC UTILITIES `�� S88'18'20'E o EASEMENT A.F. , 120.00' dr I Z 8407090680 CM RAFTS SF VS,SC 1/4 SEC 4,TAN a NORTH,RCL 3 FAST NOTES: SUNSET WAND WASH 1.ALL WORK 51MLL CONFORM TO AND SATISFY CRY OF RENTON REOUIREIENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2.SEE SHEET 1 OF l FOR CO RY noTT NOTES. U T I L I TY PLAN UTILITY PLAN3.SEE SHEET 2 OF F FOR ROCKER,ORAOIIG AlND EROSION CONTROL a SEE NETT SHEET.5 OF 7 FOR SlUry PROFILES. 5.SET 5KE1 6 OF 1 FOR DEICNTPI VAIAT PVM,NOTES,MO DELILS ILIRION I.RHAILB,PO,PIS 6.SEE SHEET 7 OF l FOR COi6TRIJC1pN DETAILS. III Ra 21191,1VBLTT,MMLRI.TON 99293 MI.0A1e1ILR MOM. .I. MY I MONA WOW. WIT OM Or 7 11 I NORTH gidra 1 1 a a 0 I'1 SCALE f.aO' - I1 • �!: I ,..... I i P I',., t-. °°off z .o i ll V' - -- J o 1 15i.., E L — F- L .J p� p0� -L„ 0 o hh Z 77 z a. xY,. 5 NraEr r RI L1J 41,1 1 1 1 II -I-- I 1 1 ail - SEEK I 16 k I — I I R§o < Z LANDSCAPE LECEND LANDSCAPE NOTES I SPECIRCAT)O T6 SOTMlCAUCOMMON NAME QUANTTY SIZE/CONDRIONS/RFMA&KS TOTAL LDT AREA-x./eew OPP-SRC L.N09UPE-14141 011-WE LANDSCAPE-1.389.1 ACCENT TREES OR-SITE NANO./PEDETAWCN. WO pp d-SRE POINOUS NLG- Z.J13.1 ft11/8 ACER RL.TamA1 9 Zzp'�CN,IPENR.�N RrEp.OGENNG I.SIYCRNX 51W1 BE SCARIFIED ON ROTOTLLED IF 31d ip�[ C MORE LORI TREE (S 4101N1 ON NANSPXM CONOTONS IEOUSRE. 11%: 2 A"0[PM TOPSOIL IN ALL Pl AAMW EA 3 ARS. SHRUBS S.Y CLYTN FNEwa GAIN MACH I.ALL PLANTING erns. i C, "Fi 0 NBIIYIIN ANUS II 1B'-ZIP MCA GAL COM.. 4.ALL PLANING IMAM.SHWML BE IN[µM,FULL AND SPRNG BOVOI.Ef" SPACED AMOR.AB'OR CIXIER CONFURP TO TIE USE STAIDD FOR NURSERY STOCK.LATEST EDMON. O FACCOCEJDRON CATAIAENSE 36 NCH PIN TO NMI FLOWERS '0,1151W5 CKER' 27 SPACNG NARROW Me'ON COOON 5.Men WEAK.OR SIZE OR RNO NOT...WILE RAT BE SUBSMUTED ONLY NM NPROVI.OF ONRER. NM JUNIPLy 'AIPIi JULEP' ZA Ae'-]Y MIGHT.G NOSE SHAPED e.Au y SS pLANI1NG5 9V11 NAPE 11RY6UlN SMOG. �1 YM JULEP JUNIPER SWING APPROX.Ae'CHI CENEJI ] PITS Swll BE INSPECTED TO AMINE PROPERDRAWEE '"'IC. CTROUND COVERS A POSITIVE 0RYAOE SIMIL BE NMM1ANm. f ] NVPFAICUN 1553e 4.POTS AT 2.-O.C. 9.WELDS A10 MILES AMAW.I'FMON CURB FOR CM L 333 OVERIMNG MUSS AIFEySTOPS NOTED. • WTURAL♦E001500I5 904 4 COSTING 10.LANDSC/F 0 COFNT ACTOR SHALL WNW.SBE UNIX FNAI INSPECTOR NO ACCEPTANCE BY ONLER. T.no LANDSCAPED AIEA.f1.1.NAVE AN C UICEPOKNA SOFT NDGAIIDN SYSTEM TO PROVIDE FOR ME PLANTS NO GRASS SWAT ARE BEND INSTALLED. 12.CONTRACTOR TO PRONEE IECESS.PT RRICARN TO NEw Ll N) 1 LNNDSCAPIIIG PER WOO DESIGN. icr 80 ISSUED By OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Transnation POLICY NUMBER A38 - 11 b 2 3 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE,THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS,TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,an Arizona corporation,herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A,sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs,attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title,as insured,but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers,the Policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY .0,E I NS(/g4y�F Attest: i \MCC/Cf41tp O • s SEPT 11 MI i Secretary ! 1-4171:fLOFC11,1111and Chief Executive Officer ORIlONp CITY OF kENTO1 FEB 2 2 1.(.4T9 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company M' EGEiv ,costs,attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: �-V 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting, regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improve- ment now or hereafter erected on the!and; (iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the affect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regula- tions, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b)the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. NM 1 PA 10 ALTA Owner's Policy(10-17-92) Valid Only If Schedules A and B and Cover Are Attached Face Page Form 1190-57 ORIGINAL POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance: $165,000.00 Policy No. A38-112623 Premium: $710.00 Order No. 41689 Date of Policy: September 2, 1997 at 3:39 P.M. 1. Name of Insured: ZI, CORP., a Washington Corporation 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is FEE SIMPLE and is at Date of Policy vested in: THE NAMED INSURED 3. The land referred to in this policy is situated in the County of KING, State of WASHINGTON, and is identified as follows: That portion of the West 259.17 feet of the East 289.17 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying Northerly of S.E. Renton-Issaquah Road; EXCEPT the North 520.40 feet thereof; ALSO EXCEPT the South 313 feet as measured along the East line thereof. Policy No.: A38-112623 Order No. 41689 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of the following: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records or any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records.. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which my by asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary, lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey of land would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien,or right to a lien,for labor,material, services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or liens under Workmans' Compensation Acts, not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitude; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under(a), (b), (c)or(d)are shown by the public records. • 7 Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, garbage collection or deposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4025 (establishing a proposed Assessment District for sanitary sewer service and establishing the amount of the charge upon connection to the facilities) AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Recorded: December 3, 1986 Recording No.: 8612031455 END OF SCHEDULE B /th • •1. DEFINITION OF TERMS. (c)Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as required or permitted by the provisions of this policy, the The following terms when used in this policy mean: Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent Jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right,in its sole discretion, (a) "insured": the insured named in Schedule A, and, subject to any to appeal from any adverse judgment or order. rights or defenses the Company would have had against the named insured, those who succeed to the interest of the named insured by operation of law (d) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to as distinguished from purchase including, but not limited to, heirs, prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the distributees, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, next of kin, or insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide corporate or fiduciary successors. defense in the action or proceeding,and all appeals therein, and permit the (b) "insured claimant": an insured claiming loss or damage. Company to use, at its option, the name of the insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the insured, at the Company's (c) "knowledge" or "known": actual knowledge, not constructive expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in any action or knowledge or notice which may be imputed to an insured by reason of the proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or public records as defined in this policy or any other records which impart defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (ii) in any constructive notice of matters affecting the land. other lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or (d) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule A, and desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as insured. If the improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured to furnish the required term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area cooperation, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy described or referred to in Schedule A, nor any right , title, interest, estate shall terminate,including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute,or or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or continue any litigation,with regard to the matter or matters requiring such waterways, but nothing herein shall modify or limit the extent to which a cooperation. right of access to and from the land is insured by this policy. 5. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE. (e) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security In addition to and after the notices required under Section 3 of these instrument. Conditions and Stipulations have been provided the Company, a proof of (I) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the insured claimant shall be Policyfor the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relatingfurnished to the Company within 90 days after the insured claimant shall to rel property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. Wit ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or respect to Section 1(a) (iv) of the Exclusions From Coverage, .public damage shall describe the defect in, or lien or encumbrance on the title, or records"ectshall also include) (ivenvironmentalfthec protection liensne filedg , inp the other matter insured against by this policy which constitutes the basis of records of the clerk of the United States district court for the district in loss or damage and shall• state, to the extent possible, the basis of which the land is located. calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured claimant to provide the required proof of loss (g)"unmarketability of the title": an alleged or apparent matter affecting or damage, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall the title to the land, not excluded or excepted from coverage, which would terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or entitle a purchaser of the estate or interest described in Schedule A to be continue any litigation,with regard to the matter or matters requiring such released from the obligation to purchase by virtue of a contractual proof of loss or damage. condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. In addition, the insured claimant may reasonably be required to submit 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER CONVEYANCE to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the OF TITLE. Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, favor of an insured only so long as the insured retains an estate or interest correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after in the land, or holds an indebtedness secured by a purchase money Date of Policy, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if mortgage given by a purchaser from the insured, or only so long as the requested by any authorized representative of the Company , the insured insured shall have liability by reason of covenants of warranty made by the claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized insured in any transfer or conveyance of the estate or interest. This policy representative of the Company to examine , inspect and copy all records, shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the insured of books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or either(i)an estate or interest in the land,or(ii)an indebtedness secured by control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. a purchase money mortgage given to the insured. All information designated as confidential by the insured claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT. unless, in the reasonable judgement of the Company, it is necessary in the The insured shall notifythe Company promptly in writing(i) in case of administration of the claim. Failure of the insured claimant to submit for Pa y P P,y examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information any litigation as set forth in Section 4(a)below,(ii)in case knowledge shall or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third come to an insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is parties as required in this paragraph shall terminate any liability of the adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as insured, and which might Company under this policy as to that claim. cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or(iii) if title to the estate or interest,as insured, is rejected as 6. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; unmarketable. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then as TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. to the insured all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the following options: rights of any insured under this policy unless the Company shall be (a)To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. To pay or tender payment of the amount of insurance under this policy together with any costs,attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by 4. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS; DUTY OF the insured claimant, which were authorized by the Company, up to the INSURED CLAMANT TO COOPERATE. time of payment or tender of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. (a) Upon written request by the insured and subject to the options Upon the exercise by the Company of this option,all liability and contained in Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations, the Company, obligations to the insured under this policy, other than to make the at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the payment required, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defense of an insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, and the policy shall be adverse to the title or interest as insured, but only as to those stated causes surrendered to the Company for cancellation. of action alleging a defect, lien or encumbrance or other matter insured (b)To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other than the Insured or against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel With the Insured Claimant. of its choice (subject to the right of the insured to object for reasonable (i) to pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name cause)to represent the insured as to those stated causes of action and shall of an insured claimant any claim insured against under this policy, together not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured Company will not pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to time of payment in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not insured and which the Company is obligated to pay; or against by this policy. (ii) to pay or otherwise settle with the insured claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' (b) The Company shall have the right, at its own cost, to institute and fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act which in its by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or obligated to pay. interest, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the insured. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this in paragraphs(bXi)or(ii),the Company's obligations to the insured under policy, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments concede liability or waive any provision of this policy. If the Company required to be made,shall terminate,including any liability or obligation to shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. defend, prosecute or continue any litigation. Conditions and Stipulations Cautioned Inside Corer B 1190-57 (Continued) 7. DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF LIABILITY AND COINSURANCE. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage sustained or incurred by the insured claimant who has suffered loss damage shall be payable within 30 days thereafter. or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy and only to 13. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT. the extent herein described. (a) The liability of the Company under this policy shall not exceed the (a)The Company's Right of Subrogation. least of: Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this (i) the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A; or, policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the insured claimant. (ii) the difference between the value of the insured estate or interest as The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and insured and the value 3f the insured estate or interest subject to the defect, remedies which the insured claimant would have had against any person or lien or encumbrance insured against by this policy. property in respect to the claim had this policy not been issued. If (b) In the event the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A at the requested by the Company, the insured claimant shall transfer to the Date of Policy is less than 80 percent of the value of the insured estate or Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary interest or the full consideration paid for the land, whichever is less, or if in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The insured claimant shall subsequent to the Date of Policy an improvement is erected on the land permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the which increases the value of the insured estate or interest by at least 20 insured claimant and to use the name of the insured claimant in any percent over the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A. then this transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. Policy is subject to the following: If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the (i)where no subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial insured claimant, the Company shall be subrogated to these rights and loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that remedies in the proportion which the Company's payment bears to the the amount of insurance at Date of Policy bears to the total value of the whole amount of the loss. insured estate or interest at Date of Policy: or If loss should result from any act of the insured claimant, as stated (ii) where a subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial above• that act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured against by this 120 percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A bears to the policy which shall exceed the amount, if any. lost to the Company by sum of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A and the amount reason of the impairment by the insured claimant of the Company's right expended for the improvement. of subrogation. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to costs, attorneys' fees (b)The Company's Rights Against Non-insured Obligors. and expenses for which the Company is liable under this policy, and shall The Company's right of subrogation against non-insured obligors shall only apply to that portion of any loss which exceeds, in the aggregate. 10 exist and shall include, without limitation, the rights of the insured to percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A. indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance or bonds. (c) The Company will pay only those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments incurred in accordance with Section 4 of these Conditions and Stipulations. which provide for subrogation rights by reason of this policy. 8. APPORTIONMENT. 14. ARBITRATION If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcels Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the insured which are not used as a single site,and a loss is established affecting one or may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules more of the parcels but not all, the loss shall be computed and settled on a of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include. pro rata basis as if the amount of insurance under this policy was divided but arc not limited to.any controversy or claim between the Company and pro rata as to the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to the the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to Date of Policy. Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to each parcel provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of by the Company' and the insured at the time of the issuance of this policy Insurance is S1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the and shown by an express statement or by an endorsement attached to this Company or the insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of policy. Insurance is in excess of S1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. by both the Company and the insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect• and under the Rules in effect on the date the demand for arbitration is _ lien or encumbrance. or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the made or,at the option of the insured, the Rules in effect at Date of Policy land, or cures the claim of unmarketabilitylack of title, all as insured, in a shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the only if the laws of the state in which the land is locatedpermit a court to completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may' be entered in any court having or damage caused thereby. jurisdiction thereof. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE the title as insured. (c)The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any insured CONTRACT. for liability voluntarily assumed by the insured in settling any claim or suit (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto without the prior written consent of the Company. by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the insured and 10. REDUCTION DF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. OF LIABILITY (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence. All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro covered hereby or by any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to tanto. this policy. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance under this President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay under any validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. policy insuring a mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to 16. SEVERABILITY. which the insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is hereafter executed by an insured and which is a charge or lien on the In the event any provision of the policy is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to includedeff that provi- estate or interest described or referred to in Schedule A, and the amount sion and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy to the insured owner. 17. NOTICES, WHERE SENT. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS. (a)No payment shall be made without producing this policy for endorsement All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required of the payment unless the policy has been lost or destroyed,in which case proof to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this policy and shall be of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. addressed to TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, 1700 Market NM 1 PA 10 Street,Philadelphia.PA 19103-3990. ALTA Owner's Policy(10-17-92) Cover Page Face Form 1190-58 ORIGINAL Valid OnlyIf Page, Schedules A and B Arc Attached g • ADDITIONAL COVERAGE ENDORSEMENT 1 to 4 Family Residence Attached to Policy No.: A38-112623 Order No.: 41689 1. This endorsement shall be effective only if at Date of Policy there is located on the land described in the policy a one-to-four family residential structure, in which the insured owner resides, either at Date of Policy or within one year of Date of Policy, as the insured owner's principal residence. For the purpose of this endorsement the term "residential structure" is defined as the principal dwelling structure located on the land, together with a garage or carport used for storage of noncommercial vehicles. The term "residential structure" shall not include detached outbuildings (other than a garage or carport as defined herein), driveways, walkways, boat ramps, docks, recreational facilities of any kind, subsurface lines, pipes, tanks, septic systems and/or drainfields, plantings of any nature, perimeter fences or perimeter walls, or any other improvements which are not an integral part of the residential structure. 2. The Company hereby insures the Insured Owner against loss or damage which the Insured Owner shall sustain by reason of: a. The existence at Date of Policy of any unrecorded liens for labor or materials attaching to the estate or interest referred to in Schedule A arising out of any work of improvement on the land in progress or completed at Date of Policy, except those liens arising out of a work of improvement for which the insured has agreed to be responsible. b. The removal of the residential structure or interference with the use thereof for ordinary residential purposes as the result of a final Court Order or Judgment, based upon the existence at Date of Policy of: (1) any encroachment of the residential structure or any part thereof onto adjoining lands,or onto any easement shown as a special exception in Schedule B of the Policy, or onto any unrecorded subsurface easement; (2) any violation on the land of any enforceable covenants,conditions or restrictions provided that this coverage shall not refer to or include the terms, covenants, conditions or restrictions contained in any lease, sub-lease or contract of sale referred to in this Policy; (3) any violation of applicable zoning ordinances to the extent that such ordinances regulate (a) area, width or depth of the land as a building site for the residential structure; or (b) floor space area of the residential structure; or (c) setback of the residential structures from the property lines of the land; or (d) height of the residential structure. c. Damage to the residential structure resulting from the exercise of any right to use the surface of land for the extraction or development of the minerals, if any, shown as an exception in Schedule B, or excepted from the description of the land. For purposes of this endorsement, the words "covenants", "conditions" or "restrictions" shall not be deemed to refer to or include any covenants,conditions or restrictions relating to environmental protection,except to the extent that a notice of violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy and is not excepted in Schedule B. This endorsement is made a part of the policy and is subject to all of the terms provisions thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto. Except to the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it increase the face amount thereof. Dated: September 2, 1997 at 3:39 P.M. Countersigned: By: EVERGREEN TITLE COMPANY, INC. Form 2354-2 Authorized Agent for Transnation Title Insurance Company WLTA Homeowners Additional Protection Endorsement(1/12/95) 1 to 4 Family Residence HOMEOWNER'S INFLATION PROTECTION ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No.: A38-112623 Order No.: 41689 The Company, recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property valuation and intending to provide additional monetary protection to the Insured Owner named in said Policy, hereby modifies said Policy, as follows: 1. Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary,the amount of insurance provided by said Policy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual upward adjustments in the manner and to the extent hereinafter specified. 2. "Adjustment Date" is defined, for the purpose of the Endorsement, to the 12:01 a.m. on the first January 1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy, as shown in Schedule A of the Policy to which this Endorsement is attached, and on each succeeding January 1. 3. An upward adjustment will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates, as defined above, by increasing the maximum amount of insurance provided by said Policy (as said amount may have been increased theretofore under the terms of this Endorsement)by the same percentage,if any,by which the United States Department of Commerce Composite Construction Cost Index (base period 1982) for the month of September immediately preceding exceeds such Index for the month of September one year earlier; provided,however, that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall never exceed 150% of the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A of said Policy, less the amount of any claim paid under said Policy, which, under the terms of the Conditions and Stipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual adjustment in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Construction Cost Index. 4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under said Policy, the amount of insurance in force shall be deemed to be the amount which is in force of the date of which the insured claimant first learned of the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as of the date of receipt by the Company of the first notice of such claim, whichever shall first occur. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, this endorsement shall be effective only if one of the following conditions exists at Date of Policy: a. The land described in this policy is a parcel on which there is only one-to-four family residential structure, including all improvements on the land related to residential use, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside; or, b. The land consists of a residential condominium unit, together with the common elements appurtenant thereto and related to residential use thereof, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside. This Endorsement is made a part of said policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and stipulations therein,except as modified by the provisions hereof. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending the effective date of said policy, unless otherwise expressly stated. Dated: September 2, 1997 at 3:39 P.M. Countersigned: By: EVERGREEN TITLE COMPANY, INC. Authorized Agent for Transnation Title Insurance Company Form 2097 Residential Inflation Endorsement NOTE: In connection with a future application for title insurance covering said land, reissue credit on premium charges(if applicable at all)will be allowed only upon the original face amount of insurance as stated in Schedule A of said Policy. 41 FVERG[ VERGREEN ORDER NO. q ((, REEN 1T1ZE COMPANY, INC. q Sec Twn Z3 Rg 5 T'�. ��t; vI e` �b � � r /X9./7 I /3o F r f *. 4 g' d tau h1 h� 0 hO- Q. -di J — -— tll < if s/Q �h\4�1o'V ,�k�ti 1,i h y�� N 59� • • o 0 m o_ It t - A\ ?��'0 Co t L •s 1 z rc s c �a0 „R, 4 r' 1 �9 g M .t- ' tea ? /P 6' .o lee. • •16$' 41 -,b 1 6/1"-‘.. ‹,-. 'ft st 'N., 2 • CIP LI FP'Z IN a `v a c'it , \� 8�-2 - C7f/ of0 • .t \ 1 v... 4 0 ((I* ^ . V \T � o . �1 ax3xNl SsI 64' a. • i,i- ,z-,,,,,ro .., c V ).‘ 1,4 zi itL 'L <`\ ti r NS P-Z L Z r .0 " $21 f r a \; . e I --, 1st, K O I',�J1� O I4,", I/./ O. 0 f ' I a ,e, -•••• / lam- ,, \ v, fie ? 96 nG. ( 0. 1+1 . 4)0 ~' I ? • dtW 1 N` ia i I RE�ITON ORD. 5673 ; le� �� Z., Fr •c- ' Y r� I //J.0� /4GNTi�/ 1 atmo �12..6 ` 41 y� za17 eJ ��r I I to • ',ski libq ff. " •Pi 111 �'" . ' ' ,o •1 Ic' I 4 f. -c!-› �, Wer. 1 'P; ' yL� L 0 `�� �7/� I l h ki If r • - ii25'""' .I w a,. I � kl I.lo 7 , `4 j3/9i'/ "=',"1 I i.� I This sketch is provided,without charge,for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including,but not limited to,area,dimensions,easements,encroachments,or location of boundaries. It is not a part of,nor does modify,the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for further information. ... '-' S i iblS 99 -024,54-ACE Erik Pehr Ebenhard Backman 14408 SE May Valley Rd Curtis Bates C E Boydston 1150 Tacoma Ave NE Renton, WA 98059 Renton,WA 98056 3920 NE 11'h Place Renton,WA 98056 i Jean Bryant James Davis C Dennis&Bernadene Dochnahl 3928 NE 111 Place 1160 Tacoma Ave NE 2006 Redmond Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Thomas&Rhonda Donohue Douglas Kyes Albert Gordon McCaleb 3900NE 11thPl 3924 NE 11thPl 3932NE 11tPI Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Dennis Dochnahl METROPOLITAN INVESTMENTS L.L.C. James Edward Snider 13020 Lake Kathleen Rd SE 1420 5th Ave#2628 4111 NE Sunset Blvd Renton,WA 98059 Seattle,WA 98101 Renton,WA 98059 a f. Dennis Spiry UNOCAL CORPORATION Everett&Donna Butler 11832 142nd Ave SE PO Box 7600 4010 NE 12th St Renton,WA 98059 Los Angeles,CA 90051 Renton,WA 98056 t DALPAY PROPERTIES L.L.C. Edwin Bailey Goebel James Volk 4033 NE Sunset Blvd 3924 NE 12th St 4000 NE 12th St I Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 James&Wendy Allen Jo Ann Berrett Sherie Brown&Mary Macnamera 1 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E104 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E102 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#B103 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 I'enton,WA 98056 Magne&Klara Erga Dana Evans rge&Frances Kobayashi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#A101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E203 033 S Lake Ridge Dr Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 .eattle,WA 98178 Peter&Robert Lorenz Vicki McCaron I J&Katherine McCambridge 3800 NE Sunset Blvd 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E302 12919 NE 203"d Ct Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 oodinville,WA 98072 11 Gregory Paddock Erin Petersen Derek Schaubroeck&Jessica Robertiello 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E 103 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E 101 1800 NE Sunset Blvd#C 102 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 'enton,WA 98056 P"-- • - i 0 (OP' ' , 411® P4P' ,4v le' 1 ::,,:!' „ , i , I> . ,® 44v 1 [13 11‘- , 1 :„,i ifiplss- . i ,PI , , 'PI°1 Shirlee Schlemmer Jayne Schraw Lisa Schroeppel 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#B101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D102 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Cheryl Shaw Adele Turner Richard&Marie Valdrighi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#B102 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E303 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D106 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Fredrick&Rosalee Walton Todd&Evan Watkins Mary Elizabeth Whalen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D103 3800 NE Sunset Blvd Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Mary Catherine White Alis Windelev Paul Worsham 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#C101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#F102 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#-204 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Born Young& Sang Mi Yim 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D104 Renton,WA 98056 4 0 \i/"P" 011'- ice- , ASSL 11 0‘ w 11 Pt° p L. OIL 041`‘ 04' tiIPb. ,III . 0. 01 . 1:06‘w-4$ 10•P° 1-o LCSLL l ifs4-1 H ikA F ovA : zI Co R P 5G{ 61 E c i i ! ► L©I K7 R I0-VIA 1. f� i'e t C-4N(7 n IL AT 1 3-5 bou( o hv ,E , 2 ,7L eOKP 1v0 L Ok C-42 '10 t)u(LS u G c,l. R- cvikN Wks t-1-- k C i t© N = LilE Wi5 f-f- TO w rT Dfi out Pfc. ' c. A-►to N Fop / Go/ND WA-s t-k- cT ) a- (APION 11-V& . ,(/,E . IF `f O t--t 14NVG AN `( QuE5 i /D/J S p&c-Asc C m_ L o IA VI -a NV ACC L I - 1�► a-S (f 3 o - ?so (. August 12, 1999 OFFICE S)F THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPELLANT: Robert C. Downing Architectural Design& Consulting, Inc. Appeal of DNS-M for Sunset Wand Wash File No.: LUA99-096,AAD LOCATION: 1425 Union Avenue NE SUMMARY OF APPEAL: Appeals ERC's mitigation measure limiting hours of operation from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Appellant's written request for a hearing and examining the available information on file,the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the August 3, 1999 hearing. The official record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,August 3, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the appeal, Exhibit No.2: Land use file LUA99-024,SA-A(by proof of posting and publication, and other reference) documentation pertinent to the appeal. Exhibit No.3: Noise study Parties present: Robert C. Downing,Appellant 5707 Parkview Lane Everett, WA 98203 John Zavaglia,Appellant 4044 NE Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 Representing City of Renton Larry Warren,City Attorney Leslie Nishihira, Development Services Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Robert C. Downing Appeal of DNS-M for Sunset Wand Wash File No.: LUA99-096,AAD August 12, 1999 Page 2 The Examiner explained that the appeal was an administrative appeal held pursuant to Ordinance 3071 and was the only administrative review to occur on the matter. The matter may be submitted back to the Examiner for reconsideration if the parties are not satisfied with the decision. He stated that the appellant had the burden of demonstrating that the City's action was erroneous, and would have to show clear and convincing evidence that the City's determination was incorrect. At that point the City could respond, if they chose to do so. The underlying applicant is seeking to establish a car detailing use at 1425 Union Avenue NE and the appeal is limited to the hours of operation of the wand car wash. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC) set the hours of operation from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Mr, Downing, appellant herein, stated that the operation is a self-service car wash with vacuums. It is appellant's understanding that the reason the hours of operation were limited was concern over the noise of the vacuums. Mr. Downing presented a noise study from the vacuum manufacturer which indicated that the amount of noise that is entering the property would be equivalent to conversation or background noise such as music, or less than 60 decibel levels of sound. The appellant suggested that if they are not allowed to operate all the vacuums 20 to 24 hours a day,that those closest to the adjoining neighbors be closed at 9:00 p.m. and the vacuums next to the detail shop near the front of the site remain open. The owners of the wand wash also operate the Chevron station to the south, but it closes at 11:00 p.m. and opens at 5:00 a.m. The Chevron station has a car wash, but not a wand wash operation. Mr. Warren noted that the noise study was not available to the ERC at the time of their decision. He further stated that not only is the vacuum a concern, but there is also noise from the car wash and the people using it. The City code is dedicated to trying to buffer incompatible uses,and in particular commercial and retail establishments from residential establishments. Light and glare are concerns, but noise is the main issue here, particularly in the back where the equipment is located. Mr. Downing responded that while they could control the noise of the machinery and could install additional landscaping buffers and sound walls on the corners of the property,there is not a lot they could do to control the public. , Mr. Zavaglia testified that he had tested the noise from the vacuums by standing at the nearest apartment. Whenever a car went by he could not hear the vacuums, so the car noise generated from the street is noisier than the vacuums. He suggested that a further option would be to shut down the vacuums and wand wash as well as the lights at the back of the site and leave the front portion operating. He stated it is necessary for them to be financially viable to have the hours of operation extended. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this appeal. There was no one else wishing to speak. The hearing closed at 9:25 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: Robert C. Downing Appeal of DNS-M for Sunset Wand Wash File No.: LUA99-096,AAD August 12, 1999 Page 3 FINDINGS: 1. The appellant, Robert C. Downing, filed an appeal of a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M) issued by the ERC. Mr. Downing, hereinafter the appellant, filed the appeal on June 21, 1999 and the was appeal filed in a timely manner. 2. The appellant who is the project manager for the underlying land use application objected to a mitigation measure or condition that was imposed by the ERC. The condition would restrict the self- service car wash to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. 3. The subject site is located at 1425 Union'Avenue NE. The site is located on the west side of Union Avenue NE about three lots north of Sunset Boulevard NE. 4. The subject site is approximately 24,886 square feet in area. The parcel is approximately 85 feet wide which corresponds with its Union Avenue frontage. The parcel is approximately 259.17 feet deep. The parcel gently slopes downward to the southwest from approximately 390 feet to approximately 384 feet. There is a steeper drop down to Honey Creek at the extreme western edge of the site. 5. The applicant proposes developing the site with a six(6)bay car wash, vacuum stations and detail shop and office. The detail shop and office would be located closest to Union. It will be two stories with a first floor of approximately 868 square feet and a second floor of 367 square feet. It would be finished with a clock tower. 6. The six wash bays and equipment room would be lined up to the rear of the detail shop in a single array from east to west. It would be approximately 26 feet wide and approximately 124 feet long. Two vacuum stations would be located to the rear of the detail shop and between the detail shop and the first wash bay. Two other vacuum stations would be located to the rear of the site. Of these, one would be located near the southwest corner of the site and the other in the west center behind the westernmost wash bay. 7. The proposed car wash and vacuum stations were proposed to be open and operational twenty-four hours per day. The detailing shop would be closed during the night One of the owners of the proposed use also owns and operates the nearby gasoline station which has a car wash that is operated by personnel rather than self-service. That owner had suggested that he or employees would monitor the unmanned facility but that the gasoline station is itself not open 24 hours per day and that there would not be constant monitoring of the subject site. The gas station and its car wash are open between 5:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. 8. The rear western boundary will be maintained in some natural vegetation from the top of the existing slope adjacent to Honey Creek. In addition,a landscape strip is proposed along this western boundary. 9. At the hearing the applicant introduced information on the noise generated by the vacuums that will be used. They produce less than 60 decibel levels of sound. This information was not available to the ERC when they made their decision. The applicant also suggested building some kind of wall or berm Robert C. Downing Appeal of DNS-M for Sunset Wand Wash File No.: LUA99-096,AAD -- August 12, 1999 Page 4 and also limiting the operation of the vacuums and even the rearmost, possibly three,wash bays during the night hours. There was no information on the noise levels as the machines age. 10. The City noted that the reference for noise is at the receiving location. In addition to the noise of the various components including the vacuums and the wash stations,the City was also concerned about the noise from patrons during the late evening hours which could include unruly,tumultuous behavior as well as radios, engine idling and the general hubbub associated with a 24 hour operation. There is also concern about the spillover of the lighting that will be used to advertise the availability of this business during these late evening hours. 11. Honey Creek runs at a diagonal along the west(rear)and south boundaries of the subject site. 12. There are two separate multiple family complexes west and northwest of the subject site. Residents of the multifamily housing expressed concern about impacts of the proposal on the adjacent creek and the noise associated with the uses proposed of the twenty-four(24)hour, round-the-clock operation. 13. The appellant specifically objected to Condition 3A which states: 3A: The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 am and 9:00 p.m. CONCLUSIONS:: 1. The decision of the governmental agency acting as the responsible official is entitled to substantial weight. Therefore, the determination of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, is entitled to be maintained unless the appellant clearly demonstrates that the determination was in error. 2. The Determination of Significance and the mitigation measures imposed by the ERC in this case are entitled to substantial weight and will not be reversed or modified unless it can be found that the decision is "clearly erroneous." (Hayden v. Port Townsend, 93 Wn 2nd 870, 880; 1980). The court in citing Norway Hill Preservation and Protection Association v. King County Council, 87 Wn 2d 267, 274; 1976, stated: "A finding is'clearly erroneous'when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Therefore, the determination of the ERC will not be modified or reversed if it can meet the above test. For reasons enumerated below,the decision is remanded to the ERC. 3. The clearly erroneous test has generally been applied when an action results in a DNS since the test is less demanding on the appellant. The reason is that SEPA requires a thorough examination of the environmental consequences of an action. The courts have,therefore, made it easier to reverse a DNS. A second test,the "arbitrary and capricious"test is generally applied when a determination of significance (DS) is issued. In this second test an appellant would have to show that the decision clearly flies in the face of reason since a DS is more protective of the environment since it results in the Robert C. Downing Appeal of DNS-M for Sunset Wand Wash File No.: LUA99-096,AAD August 12, 1999 Page 5 preparation of a full disclosure document, an Environmental Impact Statement. Similarly, attempts to remove or modify any conditions imposed to mitigate environmental impacts would be subject to strict scrutiny and the appellant would have to clearly show those conditions are wrong. 4. The appellant has failed to demonstrate that the actions of the ERC were erroneous or arbitrary and capricious. There is a definite burden in overturning an administrative determination and it requires more than a minimal presentation and mere objections to the conditions imposed to offset the environmental impacts of a proposal. 5. The appellant has failed to demonstrate the condition is unreasonable as it stands. While there may be a possibility that reasonable persons might reach a different conclusion, it is clear that the contested condition is squarely aimed at a real problem - late night noise and light which can disturb sleep or other residential amenities. The appellant even admitted that one of the owners of the nearby gasoline station with an attached car wash, although not self-service, closes at 11:00 p.m. So while there was an initial claim that the owner could monitor the subject operation during the off-hours,that would not actually be possible without additional employees. 6. As noted by the City,the City does emphasize separating when possible incompatible uses and providing reasonable transitions or buffers between them. A 24-hour car wash and vacuum operation is not necessarily a detrimental use but it can be one in an inappropriate location. As can be seen in this case,the zoning and uses alone do not necessarily accomplish the City's goals and objectives. That is why environmental review and land use review still provide necessary safeguards. Land use unlike many areas of law is not all black and white. There are shades of gray. There are standards that weigh whether something is appropriate. "Appropriateness" is not generally measured in many legal matters. As can be seen here, one tier of commercial uses does not necessarily provide a measure of a good separation. In addition,the zoning permits residential uses and commercial uses to mix immediately adjacent to each other. Permissible uses may in fact create untenable conditions when juxtaposed. Normal sounds during the day or even during the evening may not have the same impacts as those same sounds during the late night when the ambient noise levels drop substantially. Perceptions of acceptable noise vary with the hour and location. What might be reasonable along Rainier Avenue in downtown Renton may not be acceptable, even along a trafficked but mixed use street like Sunset Boulevard in the Highlands. 7. The limitations on hours of operation are not unreasonable given the situation-the nearby surrounding residential uses. There certainly is nothing arbitrary or capricious about limiting noises that can create inhospitable conditions. 8. While allowing the use to be established and then trying to reign in the potential problems is an option, that is probably not a good option. It would be unfair to the applicant if in fact 24-hour operation is necessary to support the investment and a time limitation were to follow construction and occupancy. After the investment,the business could fail. It is also unfair to the residents-placing on them the onus to complain or seem unduly sensitive to urban noises. Clearly,the locale is not a pristine, quiet, rural area, but the City does owe it to its residents to guard their amenities, particularly during normal sleeping hours. Robert C. Downing Appeal of DNS-M for Sunset Wand Wash File No.: LUA99-096,AAD August 12, 1999 Page 6 9. This office is not convinced that the ERC made any errors. The appellant did have opportunities to submit the concepts submitted at the hearing to the ERC before the decision became final --that is, altered plans, limited hours of operation and the noise figures. This office is not convinced that this information would have changed the ERC's determination. 10. This office is not in a position to weigh whether the appellant's late proposed changes, a possible wall or berm, closing off portions of the site after certain hours or the noise figures submitted, substantially alter the impacts that the proposal might generate. Staff did not have time to consider or analyze the potential changes. 11. The reviewing body should not substitute its judgment for that of the original body with expertise in the matter, unless the reviewing body has the firm conviction that a mistake has been made. No such conviction results from hearing this case. This office,based on the record,will not substitute its judgment for that of the ERC. At the same time, it appears reasonable to allow the ERC to review this new information, although at the risk of delaying resolution of this matter. This office will remand the matter back to the ERC. They may choose to alter their determination or reaffirm it even in light of the possible changes suggested by the appellant. DECISION: The matter is remanded to the ERC. They may choose to alter their determination or reaffirm that determination even in light of the possible changes suggested by the appellant. ORDERED THIS 12th day of August, 1999. FRED J.KA AN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of August, 1999 to the parties of record: Robert C. Downing Larry Warren Leslie Nishihira 5707 Parkview Lane 1055 S Grady Way 1055 S Grady Way Everett, WA 98203 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 John Zavaglia Adele R. Sunu Magne& Klara Erga 4044 NE Sunset Blvd 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E303 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#A101 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Shirlee H. Schlemmer JoAnn Berrett Dana L.Evans 3800 NE Sunset Blvd,#B101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E102 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E203 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Robert C. Downing Appeal of DNS-M for Sunset Wand Wash File No.: LUA99-096,AAD August 12, 1999 Page 7 Vicki McCarron Janice Wiggen Sheryl Kobayashi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E302 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E304 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#F101 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Alis Windelev Erin Epting Jessica Roberillo 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#F102 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Marci Hall Rosalee Walton Claudia Donnelly 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E103 3800 NE Sunset Blvd 10415 147th Ave SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Jayne Schraw Lisa Windelin Paul Worsham 3800 NE Sunset Blvd 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#F102 Kathie Eichenberger Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E204 Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of August, 1999 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Jana Hanson, Development Services Director Chuck Duffy, Fire Marshal Betty Nokes, Econonic Development Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling, Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev. Administrator South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,August 26, 1999. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. Robert C. Downing Appeal of DNS-M for Sunset Wand Wash File No.: LUA99-096,AAD August 12, 1999 Page 8 The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • . \ \ •""...- . --. P I 11.6'il I-. 1 UJ N Fi I r,, 4111110;407: r,fir j . •. ., 113'..eielLfs.,_ if r no --- _I5TH- ee 4.,e, 0 --,-- -'14 0 “ l•-•-• r fill .,--"•:11 L.' tsj : .....( w 2 !:/./1 ir.• ,10321111 0 13.A.Lt.0447 1 es.z )..,,, ,,,...„• , • ' (i' 9•!'; [3 ----- '' .. I ; ,,L®/ A 0 -, :0 50 Ar M te W.;eal /••::k6,1 avitio41 0 • :.... T l?JO .." .. • ") •0 --,,__ ,-': •••• \ .: I .1‘:_ 1 1 2 8 • t... , --Z'i :•'.. ,.•1.,,Ze"11.4.1„). \ 0 501r_______ ::• ,3 .. 40 . .r......--'.4-..; ... S V /0 491's 61 "62 , • I ', rne,(4) = c.9 fi,-!'-' ,,,, - Li r,,,, . ,,,,,„, L . r ••!': /PO • t to4 -...;;H,t I n ,. . ,„ .....„ '"Fi P Be.g. ,ri- I (2) 7 r ---' .•‘900, ..,‘.. yin C Patten --,.....„.........z, _ 08 S r: ors,Ati 0,r ig 0 5,!.5 0!!As, • i • t. , -. . I . ' DI ........ . Sk+,.,:•......'.',..:;-+- As c :::: , It rn"'s , -', • @ ,.4 s — ft,Nry- ..,,,-..,•„..s.,,,, III ao la' P. 4 r 0(1,];'. (t) '• ; al; 1;;11-2-1 ,. V•5, \! c L ..,.. . • 0.4 ,,il Per r•tf•.: Jo 'moo 4 f .r'.- oi itli (a a) i (2 F P .F.F...-1.....i."1-•:.••••(.4...F7F•••"•-'-.7411,:......1•F•••-••:-.L.:4,4•Z•14 0.4.••• ••..'Siam '?_....0„.:0,0,.‘'_/_"'6._.0:1-, V•V (('‘. ta,.,, 4r,P'rre .4,7""AiLl--;74'", hit—---2- -- ______ 'El r, oi „"„,3,' „ --.7Q le,,,yr - 8 t• • ie 2-,..kta• cit [;:l"e,t1 "f/4. • I , , 4•034•el . , ' 'Tr ":-.• .", rr7 .., .. ' i I - mai n'e.! . i• ' , -I-• 1 ...- „, 13 4. h' PL. • . I . 5 770 ul ' • .. , • .k()IZ/q..11r; ,. • _1'' I , ‘__ Stonte B De Lon./ I!I.-tj—' 1. . 'r r • ,1.5. 'LA ii 1 c o , • .•zi#;1)i. # • r 6. .4.. h •VIII. ' , •1 HE II H CT a 't B m • 6We fr) .967 -71. 2 t , ' •-• 3 l' ' I r 1- k—% - - - 8 4 r a,?. 1.'40 1_:1, \S _ :0 .; .5.,, 6 •3. frli.:;/.„73 r -. 12 13 ..=/- •A• o .ni ,. •,, , 7. . IF,-0 .. ., .. 4.*,,,,K)7. IQ. a - Z. r.y. ",r3 '''' i• i 7' u -,I— jtga . '''?7,14., t). 'W.OY 12?-3- h.• ' .V9•';I 71: _1.3 14 I .' .1VIQ 7 ';M i .,S,,. -4. a ' N.E. ,<.• .1.--1 . ' •0?:ft%.‘t MS4:liti 1. '2 'ST-73 -":".:... 'ac :C•.,,,e,' O' . . .. „To ,,,ord,.. t_."1%,,, k--'• sitv.14;•" -1, 2 _V5.-!.2.- " 0 N E. .1,: ,,•;pA,...44:,, y --..1 • ,-,,.. 241.i..:k ,6 ,,. . 4•,„ . ,„ • b - ' ',•.§ Ss. ,,,r,....../ `'"•!---,5 13 v ' uk, ..i......... ”I.I 9 •.., I ': \ Cl °*'''' ; . tie: 4,10.• '-' • .', •••: —' . _._',A g - . . .. . • . • . Y AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal RENTON,WASHINGTON • newspaper ofgeneralpublication and is now and has been for more than six months An Appeal Hearing ll be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language meeting in the Council Chambers on the continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County second floor of City Hall, Renton, Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper order of the Superior Court of the AM toiconsiton, r Augustlon0g, 1999 at 9:00 PP 9by P AM consider the following petitions: • State of Washington for King County. SUNSET WAND WASH AAThe notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County The a 096 The appellant, Architectural Design & Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Consulting,Inc.,appeals the Determination during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued by the Environmental Review Committee. The portion of the determination that is Ordinance#4788 appealed is mitigation measure number (3), section A, limiting hours of operation for the Sunset Wand Wash(File No. LUA- as published on: 7/23/99 99-024,SA-A,ECF). Location: 1425 Union Avenue NE LeThe full amount of the fee c d for said foregoing publication is the sum of$40.25, aboveeal descriptions of the fileslnoted 9 9 are on file in the Development charged to Acct. No. 805 40. t Services Division,Sixth Floor,City Hall. All interested persons to said petitions JAA--c6 , - — are invited to be present at the Public Legal Number 6389 H Published in the South County Journal July 23,1999.6388 Legal Clerk, South County Journal • Subscribed and sworn before me on this � �ay u day of C)).,JAI, 19 ciq 0\..‘0. . 7(„Ct-A aS e------\C- 1("\c '.----- 124 6-4\-C ,��,o�` -. , Notary Public of the State of Washington Q: `,3T 1i R y ••= residing in Renton _ •"' • __o, • 'o King County, Washington .o PcBot. of s i�',,,O p tNASN� o,, NOTICE OF APPEAL HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON An Appeal Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on August 03, 1999 at 9:00 AM to consider the following petitions: SUNSET WAND WASH AAD-99-096 The appellant, Architectural Design & Consulting, Inc., appeals the Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated issued by the Environmental Review Committee. The portion of the determination that is appealed is mitigation measure number (3), section A, limiting hours of operation for the Sunset Wand Wash (File No. LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF). Location: 1425 Union Avenue NE Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Development Services Division, Sixth Floor, City Hall. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing. Publication Date: July 23, 1999 Account No. 51067 aadpub Architectural Design R A • and Consulting, Inc. 5707 Parkview Lane Everett,WA. 98203 CITY OF RENTON Phone(425)348-5277 �;�3 p,�. Fax(425)742-5804 J U N 2 1 1999 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE June 18, 1999 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 Re: Appeal of Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for Application Number LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF. Project Name: Sunset Wand Wash Mr. Kaufman, We are writing this letter to appeal the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated decision made by the Environmental Review Committee on June 1, 1999. The portion of the decision we wish to appeal is mitigation measure number Three(3), section A. "The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm. While we understand the concerns for noise in relation to intrusions on the neighboring properties,we feel that there are more appropriate measures that could be utilized than restricting the hours of operation. We would not be adverse to providing additional screening to minimize the noise impact to the neighboring properties or placing the vacuum stations closest to the property to the West of the site on a restrictive timer, while allowing us to continue to operate the vacuum stations closest to the street. We thank you for your attention to this matter. If you require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact us at our office(425)348-5277. We look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely, 41 r - cf,t,il Robert C. Downing Project Manager cc:ZI Corporation lobfile �,s'rnrF y� 1889� STATE Of WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47600 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 (360) 407-6000 • TDD Only (Hearing Impaired) (360) 407-6006 June 8, 1999 Ms. Claudia Donnelly 10415 — 147th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 • Dear Ms. Donnelly: RE: Two Proposed Construction Sites in City of Renton Site: Sunset Wand Wash Location: 1425 Union Avenue NE Site: Mr. Van Gard Self Storage Location: 4700 Block of NE 4th St & 300 Block of 138th Ave SE Thank you for the copy of your May 30, 1999 letter to the City of Renton on the proposed subject construction projects. We appreciate your concerns that possible environmental impacts may occur to Honey Creek and the fish habitat as a result of stormwater discharges associated with construction activity, as well as post- construction discharges. Sunset Wand Wash Project During a June 4, 1999 telephone conversation with Lesley Nishihira, Project Planner, City of Renton, it was determined that a general stormwater permit for construction activity will not be required for this project. (A stormwater permit for construction activity is required if a project involves five or more acres, and has a discharge to a storm drain or water of the state.) The site owner will be required to meet King County and State standards in regards to discharges from the vehicle washing activity. An approval also has to be obtained from Department of Fisheries for discharges to Honey Creek. (The Mitigated State Environmental Policy Act (MDNS) is currently being processed.) Ms. Claudia Donnelly June 8, 1999 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Van Gard Self Storage Project Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Planner for the City Renton, advised me that this is a 5.6- acre project. I will be sending a stormwater application to the site owner. If they will be disturbing the entire site, and have a discharge of stormwater to a storm drain or to waters of the state, they need permit coverage. I have forwarded a copy of your letter and detail of the projects to Ron Devitt, of Ecology's Northwest Regional Office in Bellevue, for his review and consideration. If you have further information to share on the projects, please contact Mr. Devitt at (425) 649-7028. Again, thank you for helping to protect our water and the ecosystem. Enclosed for your review is a stormwater pamphlet and a copy of the general stormwater permit. If you have questions regarding this letter, or have questions on the permitting process, call me at (360) 407-6437. Sincerely, CD`A,f;,44,43K Linda M. Matlock Technical Services Unit Water Quality Program Enclosures cc: Ron Devitt, Ecology, NWRO Peter Rosen, Project Planner, City of Renton Lesley Nishihira, Project Planner, City of Renton City of Seattle Paul Schell, Mayor Seattle Public Utilities Diana Gale,Director June 3, 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON JUN 0 7 1999 Bob Gambill Sr. Real Property Agent RECEIVED Real Property Services c/o 10th floor mail room Dexter Horton Building 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1714 City of Renton Attn: Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: LUA-99-024, SA-A, EFC. Car Wash at 1425 Union Avenue NE Dear Lesley: As per our phone conversation, Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) operates a 36 inch water transmission pipeline, known as the East Side Supply Line (ESSL), in Union Avenue NE. The ESSL supplies water to all of the eastside communities and Mercer Island. Our plans indicate the pipe is 13 feet east of the west right of way line of Union Avenue NE at a depth of 2 to 5 feet. Information we need Three copies of scalable Plan, Section and Profile drawings that show the planned improvements in the proximity of our pipe. These plans will be reviewed for comment by SPU Operations. The planned to start and finish dates. Information you need As-builts of our facilities can be obtained from the City of Seattle Vault which is located at the 8th floor of the City of Seattle Municipal Building, 600 4th Ave., Seattle, 98104. Jack Tipton is the supervisor. His number is 206-684-5132. Any work in close proximity to our pipeline (including locating by potholing) must be supervised by SPU. Call SPU's Lake Youngs Headquarters at 425-255-2242 at least 48 hours in advance. Because the pipeline is only 2 to 5 feet deep, there may need to be pipe protection if heavy equipment crosses the pipe. Typical temporary bridging would be timbers and steel plate. Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor,710 Second Avenue,Seattle,WA 98104 Tel:(206)684-5851,TTY/TDD:(206)233-7241,Fax:(206)684-4631 An equal employment opportunity,affirmative action employer.Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request. Proximity of utility installations to our pipeline: 1. We like to see 10 feet of horizontal separation for parallel installations. 2. We prefer that any crossing of our pipeline be at a right angle and under the pipe. 3. Whether the crossing is over or under our pipe there needs to be a minimum vertical separation of 12 inches for water lines and mains and 18 inches for sewers and storm drains. 4. Water mains and sewer mains crossing our pipeline must be ductile iron pipe (d.i.p.). One (19' to 20 foot) section must be centered on our pipeline so that the section joints are not over or under any portion of our pipeline. The joints should be pressurized and tested for leaks. Steel cased force sewer mains are also acceptable. 5. Catch basins should not be located within 10 feet of our pipeline. Shallow curb inlets can be closer than 10 feet if the drain line diverts the water to a catch basin at a remote location. If you need any additional information please feel free to contact me at 206)684-5969 or e-mail bob.gambill(a�ci.seattle.wa.us. Sincerely, Bob Gambil Sr. Real Property Agent Real Property Services 2 1 Ii `1 st, J r.s"96 is ,f3 68 _ COVER1 i 1I CafZr (• „T, Nam. gala -a. SET/-r3T U_ ►SSW --_ U M A/1.6I . 41 (6 _ \ ) \ • • i SE/02'✓0 sr' =[ Q I.i T1 1.I <::::::› 6 . N `(NI N j S.E. 103� ST. — �� 1 \ nA1 �- �— ---- -- 3G.0 `mac- 1 j 452 , i 04 t � t —---- -- -------- --- —'� • 1 1"GAS SERVICE i ! SE /OS suPc � W'IN6 6O, WA 3312.14.1 5E. IO65T. I. C .01 r 7- -/--r 7'--7 —71--,.-"L / 7 7 7— / N ' i /3 l Gasser-✓ 1 / \ /xiinqq over' -}4 /92S 'EN./oG oii S�. ' l .V 1 I/ N.E. 19 ST. »1z a r — —..-- 11711- wS.E.I 0 G ST ST ' LJ a"ELCT'.O. 14cum 1 I, Q Q 94.N Or 1O7TH /� •O / NE. 17 ST. . Ir'w.lzt57O.? i • l / _' CITY of R-- i t • ;,w SE. 107 ST.app q'pg•N I / I I o F V In • r cn y •l• / Ill • IK ,: L c i I., U •NIE.. -_. I S�ti'S`- _ u I COti A i 1 II 1 t Bo 1 ` ; I - L4•SeW@r K'in9 ovEK #5 1 I bS Q CEI EWER IVLli • �• �. 3o"Cevcr. 3MV j NE 2TH ST I__l == i���s=a ,. ) ( 8"sP , Sec.Z/ne 19'S. o� V/n9 p d 7 S I'BoIsw36'cIP 14'5.o v 11 t 1 . . #/O 13 I 132'S �! - S . t of 30"V 1 11 I ' j ;CITY ELF REI�TtyN - _ _ C 1.R ENT PLANMN tll AF�Dl4�/IT O> l >l3IIdA1L1NG On the 314 day of -Su me_. , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing . CRerot. bvrd Dectsir-ln documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Robevgt IgoWv%%KAI F'wclnt{tctu.va.L D.ectgv‘ Z-1 C.orpotraAtM M0.0‘K'G 0.4td v-ka.. et. swift. gtotrl,ec Sct- ttnntnner- rttn Ep vtim Tess tca. t.ober►ito Rosate a lA btro v► 70 4 ewet 04 via Evy&v Paul WOvslnn.►'+'+f Kane Etchevsbe►Ter Vtt lc.� nnc.C&ywr Kdete Sunv 70.Yttcc W►99etn SloetN l Kotoeya.sttit C t a tad t o Do h hettl+y �a�l he. Scanv'owv 1 (Signature of Sender) Sa \fi '. k gc•c-ole V- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ArALA k• °e signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for`the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: I y/�� )-)1 Notary Public Wand for the State of Wafshington Notary (Print My appoint +`TI 0...va;i COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: Sutnsat tdomikd wetsk Project Number: LUpe.qq , 02.4 ,Si -tq tEalf NOTARY.DOC REPORT City of Renton & Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: June 1, 1999 Project Name: Sunset Wand Wash Applicant: Robert Downing/Architectural Design and Consulting Owner: ZI Corporation File Number: LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant,Architectural Design &Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand wand wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total approximately 1,235 sq.ft. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 3 parking spaces. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. Project Location: 1425 Union Avenue NE Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 1,584 sf(to be demolished) Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 4,482 sf Site Area: 24,886 sf Total Building Area SF: 4,482 sf N MlJ� O16A< , l 6L�el = E � e�� rr rra »� r A onto ,. _ am._<�_. nt. A el F-i . DO M .0 Qa '� h 4.4`\ ff7T7�7a/� --.-. II Ar NCO `l f r!:! T�\9() F eegt,�i°V I (2) i - __..�, '/ ,�,-. .n C Patten 0 'yam I .- \ \(n 10 CIO F. 44.1 rf '`r l .,, I r,0! a W t '1!! r` 9� �.� a/ ]®'r (z ' ! �° s I.- s ®� a r.., r,.. ..•.r ..7... }0 r eer 3 0) z 1l5Ac I . (3)l' „ :,;_3o I' V�� "A' wl ii'l -----=,,-, l2) _-_ Ispo .., ,9' s T » ,. 1 s'im C 3+� H a PL. - 11 IIII - `, _2„ i1' Z6 s tyj e�� I Stanley B De long is gwfet - 1., tns�.Z � ... �` 6li Q i 4 Yt t,i °®e I , 6; h '`g" +..'Y' s •'� • .I 653 Ar .� 94II H CT. a a i °�m .967 6T 0 ' k 1 .,�.�g � riFin-±-'- : ,;,6 L ^ � 9.A • .ga9r.i'. .,.` .l) ° .;a+-:M 4+;`...1 I ®�. +r ��`�t'' s - N.E. Project Location Map N.E• 1.111. ~i %op , Q ,' j SITER( City c f Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REPCRTAND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 2 of 11 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is requesting environmental review and administrative site plan approval for a self-service hand wand wash in the Center Neighborhood (CN) zone. The hand wash bays will total approximately 3,247 square feet. A detail shop and office are also proposed and will total approximately 1,235 square feet. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 3 parking stalls. Two driveways are proposed off Union Avenue NE for ingress and egress to the site. The proposal will require the placement of approximately 1,156 cubic yards of fill. Approximately 18,398 square feet of asphalt and 2,373 square feet of landscaping are proposed on the site. The site is vegetated mostly with grasses along with pine and cedar trees ranging from 6 to 24 inch caliper in size. The project will maintain a 25 foot setback from the ordinary high water mark of Honey Creek, which is located approximately 40 feet south of the site. In addition to the removal of the trees and vegetation, the existing 1,024 square foot residence and 560 square foot detached accessory structure is proposed to be demolished. [PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240,the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site consists of gently rolling slopes with a maximum elevation change of 6 feet. The majority of the site contains slopes of approximately 3% in addition to slopes of 6%to 15% on the western portion of the site. The slopes become increasingly steep beyond the west property line as the slope continues down to the ravine containing Honey Creek. A geotechnical report prepared by AdaPT Engineering, Inc. was submitted with the application. Subsurface conditions vary significantly across the site. According to the report, the site appears generally stable, showing no signs of slope movement or differential settlement, and the underlying undisturbed glacially consolidated soils are in a medium dense to very dense conditions and have relatively high strengths. The report recommends that structures located in undocumented fill areas have the foundation support extend through the old fill, or that the material be removed and replaced as structural fill. Earthwork is also recommended during dry weather conditions. The project will require approximately 420 cubic yards of excavation and 1,576 cubic yards of fill -- a net of 1,156 cubic yards of fill to be imported to the site. The site will be cleared of all vegetation and trees, with the exception of 984 square feet of natural vegetation at the rear of the site which is to remain undisturbed. The proposal includes standard erosion control practices including, erosion fences, berms, siltation ponds, straw mulch, check dams, and erosion control channels. However, due to the proximity of this project to Honey Creek, special attention should be required for monitoring the erosion and sedimentation control measures during site construction. In order to mitigate the potential impacts to Honey Creek from the development of the site, staff will recommend the applicant provide weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall provide weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation to be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities will be required prior to approval of occupancy for the project. CI I-FRC' City Df Renton P/B/PW Department Iministrative Site Plan Approval&Environme eview Committee Staff Report 3UIVSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REP JRT AND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 3 of 10 Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 2. Water Impacts: There are no wetlands or surface water identified on the subject site. Honey Creek is located approximately 40 feet south of the property. Of the 23,180 square foot site, 90% (22,513 square feet) is proposed to be impervious surface or structures. A total of 2,373 square feet of landscaping is proposed, including the area of natural vegetation. According to the drainage report and conceptual drainage plan submitted with the application, all surface runoff is proposed to be directed to catch basins that will collect the water and discharge it to the creek. A Hydraulic Project Approval permit from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife will be required for the proposed discharge into the creek. The proposed drainage plan includes detention, per the KCSWM, but proposes the use of a stillwater sump in lieu of standard water quality treatment provisions. This will not be acceptable and the project will be required to modify the drainage system in order to mitigate drainage impacts to Honey Creek. In addition, due to erosion problems within the Honey Creek channel, additional mitigation will be recommended in order to reduce the release rate for the developed site. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a revised drainage plan that addresses the following: 1. Per the KCSWDM, the project must be modified to include either(1) a bioswale, (2) a wetvault, or I (3) a combined detention/wet vault system. 2. The release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2 year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100 year storm event. The revised drainage plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 3. Light and Glare/Noise Impacts: There will be minimal impacts to noise and glare during the initial construction of the site. However, the use of the site as a self service car wash is proposed to operate 24 hours a day. The operation of the vacuum stations and the lighting of the site may pose potential impacts of noise disturbance and glare to adjacent properties, specifically the multi-family residences located west of the site. The proposal includes the retention of 984 square feet of natural vegetation located in the rear of the site and proposes an additional 5 foot landscape strip (480 square feet) in the rear. In addition, automatic turn-offs will be included in the vacuum equipment. Although the proposed landscape buffer will serve to enhance the site and will provide some screening of light and noise to properties to the west, the proposed buffer will not adequately mitigate these impacts. In order to mitigate noise impacts to the adjacent properties, the hours of operation for the proposed car wash will be limited to the hours between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm. In addition, a lighting plan will be required in order to ensure there is minimal glare to the properties in the vicinity. A detailed lighting plan which indicates the type, location, and lighting radius for each fixture will be required. Mitigation Measures: 1. The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm. 2. The applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan which indicates the type, location, and lighting radius for each fixture. The lighting plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) SITE RC City of Renton P/8/PW Department Iministrative Site Plan Approval&Environme..._. .Review Committee Staff Report SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REF ORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 4 of 10 3. Fire Prevention Impacts: The proposal will add 4,482 square feet of new construction to the City that will potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $0.52 per square foot of construction, applies to all new construction in the City. The mitigation fee for this proposal is estimated at $2,330.64 (4,482 sf x$0.52 = $2,330.64). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of buildings permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. 4. Transportation Impacts: The proposal will result in an increase in traffic trips and is therefore subject to the City's Traffic Mitigation Fee. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated at a rate of$75 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. The fee for this proposal is estimated at$10,875 (145 trips x$75 = $10,875). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with a Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall provide weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation to be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities will be required prior to approval of occupancy for the project. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised drainage plan that addresses the following: A.) Per the KCSWDM, the project must be modified to include either(1) a bioswale, (2) a wetvault, or(3) a combined detention/wet vault system. B.) The release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2 year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100 year storm event. The revised drainage plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 3. A.) The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm. B.) The applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan which indicates the type, location, and lighting radius for each fixture. The lighting plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. SITE RC City of Renton P/B/PW Department iministrative Site Plan Approval&EnvironmE Review Committee Staff Report SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REF JRT AND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 5 of 10 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal pi ocess for environmental determinations. Planning 1. Refuse and recycle dumpsters are required to be screened by a 6 foot fence or landscaping, or by a combination of both. A screening detail will need to be provided with building permit application. 2. All landscape areas are required to have underground sprinkling systems. 3. All lighting is required to be downcast and shielded so as to illuminate only the development and not create undue glare or reflection of light. Light standards shall not be located so as to interfere with parking stalls, stacking areas and ingress and egress areas. 4. Separate sign permit applications are required for any proposed signage. PE rks 1. All landscaping areas outside of property line are to be maintained by the applicant. B�ildinq 1. A demolition permit will be required. 2. An oil water separator will be required. 3. Maintain required occupancy separations. Fii e Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gpm which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional fire hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. PI in Review—Water 1. The site is served by an existing 10"water main located on the east side of Union Avenue NE. The site is in the 565 foot pressure zone and has an approximate static pressure of 74 psi (based on site elevation 393 feet). The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 2. No water main extension will be required for this project. 3. There are two existing fire hydrants located within 300 feet of the proposed building. An additional fire hydrant is required per Fire Department requirements. All three hydrants must comply with current City standards, including Stortz fittings. 4. New water meters will be required sized to meet current UPC standards for domestic and irrigation with an RP backflow prevention device for the domestic service and a double check valve assembly for the irrigation service. 5. Water System Development Charges of$0.113 per sq.ft.will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for the project. This project will be eligible for redevelopment credits on comparative sizing of water meters before and after development. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The site is currently served by existing sewer mains as follows: 8" main located in Union Ave NE (west side) and 12" main located in an easement south and west of the site. 2. No sewer main extensions will be required for this project. 3. The car wash bays will require a drainage system to collect and direct runoff water to an oil/water separator with discharge to the sanitary sewer. If the proposed building has rest room facilities, they will need to be connected to the sanitary sewer. 4. The minimum slope for the side sewers shall be 2%. 5. Sewer System Development Charges of$0.078 per sq.ft. will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance for the construction permit for the utility improvements required for the project. This project will be eligible for redevelopment credits based on comparative sizing of water meters before and after development. P an Review—Drainage 1. The applicant will be required to obtain a drainage easement across the property to the south for the storm drain proposed outside of the site's property line. 2. It appears that an HPA permit will be required for this project. We strongly encourage the applicant to contact the FWD to verify this requirement, and to determine if there will be any special conditions placed upon this permit. The FWD may not allow underground facilities for water quality treatment as part of their permit conditions. 3. Surface Water System Development Charges of$0.129 per sq.ft. of new impervious surface will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for this project. SIT ERG City of Renton P/B/PW Department iministrative Site Plan Approval&Environme Review Committee Staff Report SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REF ORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 6 of 10 Plan Review—Street Improvements 1. Union Ave NE adjacent to the site is currently fully improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk and lighting. No further street improvements are required for this project. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the new buildings must be underground. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility and drainage improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for the construction permit, and the remainder when the permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. PA'ZT THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT& DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental det arm ination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan (Received April 22, 1999). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Building Elevation and Floor Plan (Received April 22, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Landscape Plan (Received April 22, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Utilities Plan (Received April 22, 1999). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Neighborhood Map (Received April 22, 1999). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The site is designated Center Neighborhood (CN) on the Comprehensive Land Use Map. The CN designation is intended to provide services for the adjacent and surrounding neighborhoods. The proposed use as a car wash falls within the range of uses consistent with this designation. The proposal is consistent with the following applicable CN policies: Policy LU-114. Promote the clustering of Neighborhood Commercial uses and discourage the development of strip commercial areas. The proposal is surrounded by existing commercial development — an existing veterinarian office and gas station are adjacent to the site and commercial uses exist across the street. The clustering of commercial uses is maintained by located the proposed use within an existing commercial area. Policy LU-115. Adequate retail goods and services should be provided at neighborhood centers to encourage residents to shop locally for daily goods rather than drive to regional centers. There are a number of SITI.RC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REF ORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 7 of 10 residential developments in the immediate area surrounding the site. The proposed use will provide a service that will encourage nearby residents to perform regular maintenance on their vehicles within the local area. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is zoned Center Neighborhood (CN). Car washes are allowed as primary permitted uses in the CN zone. Lot Coverage —The CN zone allows a maximum lot coverage by buildings of 65%. The total building footprint area proposed is 4,115 square feet. The proposal arrives at a 16.5% lot coverage by buildings, complying with this requirement. Setbacks — The CN zone requires a minimum setback of 10 feet and a maximum setback of 15 feet from the street frontage. The proposed detail shop and office building satisfies this requirement by providing a 10 foot setback from the front property line. The CN zone does not require rear or side setbacks. The site plan , submitted shows incorrect dimensions for the east and west property lines (i.e., according to the scale provided the dimension should be 96 feet, not 85 feet). As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to revise the site plan to show the correct dimensions for these property lines. Building Limitations — The CN zone restricts buildings to 35,000 square feet in size. The proposal, at 4,118 square feet, is well below the size limit. The CN also limits building height to 35 feet. The wash bays remain below this requirement at a building height of 20 feet. The detail shop and office building includes a clock tower with a height of 32 feet— also below the required height limit. Landscaping—A minimum landscaped width of 10 feet along street frontages is required in the CN zone. The project satisfies this requirement by providing a 10 foot wide landscape strip along the front property line with the exception of the driveway curb cuts. A total of 2,373 square feet of the site is proposed to be landscaped. In addition to the landscape strip in the front of the site, a 5 foot strip is proposed in the rear along with 984 square feet of undisturbed natural vegetation. Parking — The parking regulations require a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 4.5 parking spaces per 1,0001 square feet of floor area dedicated to office use. Motor vehicle services require 1 space per 400 square feet of area dedicated to vehicle service. The wand wash bays and vacuum stations are considered drive-in services (customers remain with their vehicles while obtaining services on the site) and do not require additional parking stalls outside of those provided at each wand wash or vacuum station. The project includes a building containing a 868 square foot detail shop on the first floor and a 367 square foot office on the second floor. The project is required to provide 3 parking spaces on the site—all of which are provided. Standard ninety degree parking stalls are required to be 9 feet wide and 20 feet long. Ninety degree parkins stalls also require a minimum back out distance of 24 feet. The site plan proposed is showing a stall length o1 19 feet for the 3 required spaces located on the west end of the site—below the minimum standards. Ir addition, the stall closest to the structure does not satisfy the minimum back out distance of 24 feet. However the parking regulations allow for a reduction (2 foot maximum) of the required stall length when adequatE overhang is provided. The modification of the proposed stall lengths to account for the allowed overhang wil provide the required 24 feet of back out distance. As a condition of approval, the site plan will need to bE revised to provide the required 24 foot back out distance for the required parking stalls, as well as the revisec stalls lengths, if necessary. The revised plan is subject to the review and approval of the Developmen Services Division and is required prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed use of the site as a 24 hour self service car wash may potentially impact adjacent properties The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) required as part of its Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the project, issued June 1, 1999, that the applicant provide mitigation for noise and light impacts The required mitigation includes limitations on the allowed hours of operation and the provision of a detailec lighting plan. SF FRC City of Renton P/B/PW Department iministrative Site Plan Approval&Environme..__. .Review Committee Staff Report SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REF ORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 8 of 10 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The subject site is located adjacent to Honey Creek and discharge into the creek from the site is proposed. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) required as part of its Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated for the project, issued June 1, 1999, that the applicant provide mitigation for erosion and drainage impacts to Honey Creek. Weekly reports on the status of erosion control measures and the appropriate design of the drainage system are included in the required mitigation. The applicant will also be required to obtain a Hydraulic Project Approval permit from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal would allow for the redevelopment and enhancement of a commercially zoned property that is currently underutilized. The development of the site is anticipated to conserve property values in the vicinity. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Access to the proposed development will be provided by two driveways off Union Avenue NE. The driveway located on the north end of the site totals 25 feet in width and includes an ingress and egress lane divided by a concrete curb. A second driveway of 12 feet in width will be located on the south end of the site's street frontage. The parking and drive aisles proposed on the site are adequate for vehicle circulation — with the exception of the modifications to the required parking stall lengths and back out distance as previously discussed. A pedestrian connection is required from the street sidewalk to the entrance of the building in order to ensure safety to pedestrians entering the site. This is not included on the proposed site plan. As required by the CN zone development standards, the connection must be kept clear from vehicle traffic. A small pathway across the front landscape area will need to be created in order to connect the sidewalk to the building. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to revise the site plan to provide the necessary pedestrian access connection to the detail shop and office building. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed buildings are sufficiently setback from property boundaries to allow for adequate light and air circulation to the building. As previously discussed, the applicant will be required to submit a detailed lighting plan. The plan will demonstrate that the site is adequately lit as well as ensure that lighting will not penetrate beyond the site and impact adjacent properties. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposed development is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. However, as previously discussed, potential noise and light impacts exist to adjacent properties. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The project site is adequately served by utilities and roads. No sewer or water main extensions are required The applicant will be responsible for the extension of utilities on-site to serve the development. Please refer to the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information regarding utilities and public services. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight The proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by redeveloping a deteriorating residence into an improved commercial site. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. SIT=RC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environmental Review Committee Staff Report SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 9 of 10 D. Findings, Conclusions& Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter,the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the Sunset Wand Wash, File No. LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 6. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Neighborhood. 5) Zoning: The Site Plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Center Neighborhood Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: residential development, including single family and multi-family development, East: commercial and residential, including single family and duplex development; South: commercial development, and West: residential development. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Neighborhood; and the Zoning designation of Center Neighborhood. F. Decision The Site Plan for the Sunset Wand Wash, File No. LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Mitigation Measures issued with the ERC's June 1, 1999 Threshold Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. 2. The site plan shall be revised to include: A.) The correct dimensions for the east and west property lines. B.) The provision of a 24 foot back out distance for the required parking stalls. Modifications, if necessary, to the parking stall lengths must also be indicated on the revised site plan. C.) The provision of a pedestrian access connection linking the sidewalk to the detail shop and office building. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SI:3NATURES: Jana Hanson, Zoning Administrator date C ITCDC City of Renton P/B/PW Department iministrative Site Plan Approval&Environm&,,,,.., Review Committee Staff Report SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF REf ORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 1, 1999 Page 10 of 10 TRANSMITTED this 215r day of June, 1999 to the applicant and owner: ZI Corporation(property owner) Robert C. Downing (applicant) 4044 Sunset Blvd NE Architectural Design and Consulting Rer ton,WA 98056 5707 Parkview Lane Everett,WA 98203 TR 4NSMITTED this 21st day of June, 1999 to the parties of record: Ma me& Klara Erga Dana L. Evans 38(0 NE Sunset Blvd A-101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd E-203 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Shi lee Schlemmer Paul Worsham& Katie Eichenberger 38(;0 NE Sunset Blvd B-101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd E-204 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Vicki McCarron Eri r Epsting 3800 NE Sunset Blvd E-302 3800 NE Sunset Blvd E-101 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Adele R. Sunu Jessica Roberillo 3800 NE Sunset Blvd E-303 3800 NE Sunset Blvd Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 MarcyHall Janice Wiggen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd E-304 3800 NE Sunset Blvd E-103 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Ro Walton Sheryl Kobayashi 1? 1A_t R saleeNE SunsetanBlvd 3800 NE Sunset Blvd F-101 �V Renton,WA 98056 Re Eton, WA 98056 Alis Windelev Jo Berrett 3800 NE Sunset Blvd F-102 38.)0 NE Sunset Blvd E-102 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 C kat-LAct )O Y�Gl1�.r TRANSMITTED 21st day of June, 1999 to the following: 10415 — 141 '` Pute,sE Lai ry Meckling, Building Official ReAkuln` WWt cti5OS1 C. Duffy,Fire Prevention Joy-the jC,AVAy� Nell Watts, Public Works Division 131VCL. La vrence J.Warren, City Attorney 3 uo l\E Suvtiish So ith County Journal R_v\ t WV"( d1S02 Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental &termination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 21, 1999. If io appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. SI TERC •SITE INFORMATION � //^�_ RK 9 CONSICRON TYPE: -N :: 1 40 IDMMG:lit C fl1[NI MO0000 S NEA z..36.1 IIBMO COSTING MPERVM5 SUM/CMG: 1.703N 5.6R PROPOSED MPERV OUS SURFACE: 22.513 90.51 NEN DEALOPQIEM ON MIE: 23.602N 96.0R 1E19 PNMG: 5.396 779s 1N1SCAPHG: NORTH NSN I80l sW*11P1: 98 9 !!L1[1 . OFF OFF-SIZE. N PROPOSED MAIDM15: 1.1160 16.51 0�0"' 19 10 9 OCT.a6 3 i SI . 966Mp1 N r./367 1n9 PN 1CAlE f.WO PROPOSED SETBACK: 10'0•ME 15.0•MUM.(FRONT) PROPOSED SEIELAM: 10'0•(FRONT) P ORNO: 9 S0M1GNO STALLS 3 I LEGAL Of50tWT)ON . , i Ill - 1Ri PARCEL NO. 041-305-906I ( I I NAT PORTON OF 11E NEST 256.17 nu OF THE EAST 266.17 1 _ ' FEET OF 11E SOUIIESSI OUSRMER OF ME SOUOEAST OWNER I i OF SECTOII A.10M511V 13 NORM.O WL 5 E/51.R.N..IN ` v 0n1 08 -- �. KMO COUNTY.aSMNOION.E11Nf NORIIERET OF 50UT1EASr J P RERION-SYDUW ROID. 1 / �..•+ s s.�zl [ -, EXCEPT111E NORM 320.40 FEET TI 007€, 11 I p `' I I o Z EAST i ALLO f �Crin ME ioum 515 FIR i5 MwfIR1[9.aa1c n1[ 9 " . 9 — ^ 1�y v-N_�IN_O N_e' „_Y _C �F-_p�N�°•—� 1 _ - 6 I Z a. MEA 11GM ® ELEC.9MLr 46 1- F3 ' - ? :. n Ol ]1'E ME NIDPAM 0 11OR POLE ®— 'I RA TA ur v ' - MY-E MU RAD I M - I Wv P. aTw wavE • mom c svw vwRT L iI I ( W ■ NAM METER H an rat 1n �� 0 1yAT.py��y1 F ° J ' 0 3 �� E a� ■ so. ♦ Pu -P'—� (--' Y AL tRY ? 1 r Z O 51ow1 DRRM 11PH1pE ♦ PONEA rOEF■/uEs tal 10; J I _; • a,ER UE NN6 at 2 Op.•Nras1 j E' �. Z VKNITY MAP W t '- -- ' - - �-- - '--•--•- •- Z \ \ �A- I� u 4-05 I OMi R� l II► I' 61,1•Li.'+ , I I I I i I �— "°"SEEN I I ! - I I II '�` SITE 1 II � 1 I I. t1 -aC. Ow Ala 1 I996r iv ow fHALgJlAMI PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON • Ill RAI.395 6 (j. �i CATCH a sW 1 • g I ti i RIM 390.2 Is IX 6a. SCE sl.l W.FOR Rocrrm 1/i[. • •ouo6)•/' r $ '•u, s,: -..S., - p_ N Nt.f T SfC:. 2. SCALE r TM .• ri 'ti -ii 3 / s , "��-REMOR sAHMRI COSMIC SnrD 10 B[ 1 I MU p '� ' 1 T91 SUN,IN ee0.23 RF TIVE 1 I, 39,3 ' —— —TYPE Il C•! t ,'ems-0•� Fw.nooR N zt.s Truce, r µ Nukes ,Mv 1 e'Ne.m .Saw vAULT N•Lp 1 '� 22 w1AT u .m) ACCESS(MIDI M/ I I 't► 9NRI W UDDER STEAL 1lF[l �taar Ru N9.o 1 �' 43 Ls 00.0264 r a. /-..w,e '1 • �^' Div '� ( lay IR' Seate M'E R-MDR ! I ' RIPE IL CET• z.f 'r •i RN 366.65 AT ,N.Nl.9 No •386.05 MIT C2 FOR ROCKER( ______.-___________ I _ j NV.e•10 I EA I �MYl1 SO-I-90 \ felt., u'FNF1rl I `)9 if- IYIOPE SD _ I IIJ _�Z—`PIFDIF E I.ARr Mt F, `.................... c p I f2'^Q `- ��.`_ V I urn I o o �,�A. \ I r ` p! • M 588 18'20"Etn m TI'OKI! L III IIIL:• s o EA'EMENT A.F. s�, '\ 120.00' 6"� Z R40 7J9!?;80 as.FLAN) St UT,S[vA SEC♦Mk XI MORTIS 9CC S UST MITES: SUNSET WAND WASH I.ALL MORA SNT11 CONFORM TO MO SAWS CET OF RERION RLOOIRE)(MS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2. SEE L(51 101 1 FOR COMAuc IDlloll ND>�. UTILITY P LA N 3.5EE L(Ll 2 OF 1 FOR ROCFERI,GRACING N CG G A EROSION Mon PIMI • 5EI NM MITI.5 U 1 FOR On)I1 PROWS. S.SAL SHED 6 0,I Mr OMITI„N•Nll MN.N0R5.Me Nl•A5. ,•I.NwA n 05 6.5LE L(fl 1 OF 7 FOR CONSTRICTION MAILS. FL)Cr 1o,MART,MMH(<.ION t®1 I % i► Yq °LL IT NORTH R§Ili! E. I'i a a 9 a L �N® li n e i 1:- t R.I _ o01 m u I D o t 1 I 1. t l i'{ i Z T_ _ I 'O w I I I I 1 —t— 1 - I _HONE-, I _-�EfK I N C Ln 0 Z LANDSCAPE LEGEND LANDSCAPE NOTES&SPEOFICATIONS BOTH NAME QUAPITY SQE/CONDTTONS/REMARKS TOTAL LOT AREA-24.568e1 OFT-SRE uNoswE ON-STYE LANDSCAPE-1.3894, ACCENT TREES DN-sITE NATURAL VEGEIATEN-98441 DN 015-SITE PLM1 AREA- 2.3204 1211 0 ACER ROBRUA 9 22'CAPER T 4Ep.A'OPENNG 1.9UBLPAOE SHALL BE SCARPED OR ROTOTLLFD IF COEU/SURE RAPLL TREE 2O`3gw11 M PLwSPKNC CONDRIONS REWIRE. 2. DEPTH TOPSOIL N ALL PLANTS.AREAS. SFRUB$ I II S.2'mom FI EG 400 DARK YAGN IN Au RANT-RAG BEDS. O s VIBURNIAA 1M5 12 18'-2{'HIGH.5 CAL GONI.. ♦ ALL FLUITNG WIERUL SHALE BE BEAN.Nu.Nu.AND 'SPRNG BOu0l.E1' SPAONG APPROx.A8'ON CFMFR CONTORT.TO RE DU FOR NUR5ER1 STOCK.LATEST MOON. O RH0000E2ORVN CATAN9EN5E 36"HGN Pr«TO M E FLOWERS '{?IRI$T 5 CNER' 2) SPACIM;APPROx.48'ON cEMER 5.RAM WTERTA CLZE OR KIND NOT ARAEARU WT BE S00501121E0 ONLr APPROVAL Or ONER. (� 11.10 R15 0uNEN515'NNT 0110' 24 A8'-72'NIGH.6'VASE 511ADm 6.ALL LL SS PtANRNS 9WL RARE 10*02 LM SPACe1G. �L - Tea JIAF➢JNIDER SWI0HL APPRO1.A8'ON CENTER 7 ALL TREE PITS S1WL BE INSPECTW TO INSURE PROPER ./�. (ROUND COVERS fN OAz LT POSITIVE DRAINAGE 51<NL BE EYNTNED. �,•�''I HiRERCUN T5334 4'PDrs AT 2:D.C. 9.5•06U035 AND TREES YNWY 42'MOM CURB PUN CAR OIONTANG UUE55 IEHEE3510P5 NOTED I 71 NATURAL VEGETA10N 9840 0051NG 10.LNOSUNNG CONTRACTOR SHALL NNMARA SRC UTME MP T/INSPECTION ARO ACCEPTANCE Br OWNER. 1I.THEWOSGVFD A HAVE REA NEL HE AN ulO LM(R010 stET IRIRC TON 51SIF?1 TO PROVIDE 108 THE PLANTS AND GRASS TWT ARE BEND INSIA ED. 12.CONTRACTOR TO PROJCE IECESSART PAID 1l)N TO NEN L1 d 1 LLNDSUPING PER 9DOER DESIGN. *0 ler OW E*1 dam! 1 3 /Jrr7'6 •4 gt1 4 ll1 Li _ II o11111 il- II II it [Nipli it 4 II _£ II o ir „,,,,,i , ,:, , a'd fr-o•I--o'- -1—. -o I o-'—/Y4•f-Yd t ao IA Kp!c b 0. I21�T SHOP FLOOR PLAN SERE,/.'.1'-0• OFFlCE ROOK PLAN SCALE 1/4�I'4 1 J CCLOR SCHEDULE 3 a i f and ].-o ♦ C-o• `.a..� a•—� ---- - ��1 1 ` aa0a c0 ® DELRL*WI Ln Y 2 o Q BURGUIDI I wm..ow AAR ro E WOAD uw..a. i ..,' '14 I } e U 12 & . 1 i I..c* ---\ 1 t ` 11 ..u —DETAIL SHOP i . .T II dill, MN 111111111111•1 1 1 1 I_ -1 I I °-0'�rd .. 1s. rY-. .-. Y-V „o r-r ._o Y- J_rr ,K. aD1 1 NORTH R SOUTH ELEVATION Svu v.•-t•-o• EAST ELEVATION ms•.,.,..o.a....., SCALE I/:-r-o ��A 15'-e" 16'-5" 16'-e' iii jL r r 1 NOIiN g L = &SIM LIMA MY.N u BAY. , s J li WANDWASH BUILDING LAYOUT SCALE 1/e•-1*-0' Bg COLOR SO EDULE d 9 COLOR 20'-2" 53'-0' PEARL WWI I. I I .0._0.T...00,A._ pi-, _ . . .. /ardl►a�A ,ri _ L_ „.„..,:,,,,. , MN i 2 I � M , ,'. vt = un Cj 0 J m NORTH ELEVATION SCR U 1/1•-1'-0' WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/e'-1'-0" IV;:t7ultsdt "'NJ -- . 1 El litti -rrrrrr' .,9,err;1:i'cr��— — — — �rr::L;i ii r' _ — ; i i r = = = c _ = �( = _ �~ 1 = i j.t2 i�c uaN.TL.ED CNU BLOCK 1,19. ![E3 SIB 1p 1 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/e"-r-O• EAST EEVATION SEILE t/e"—r-0' yotim CITY OF RENTON . CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING' On the 34 day of , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing t✓sx �eerm‘m..i t011 documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) Sair ti l k- See. ete STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that � �/� � S� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for4he uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: G l Li 166 Y- Notary Public in nd for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My app AMA f tP WCAMpHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: SUvs.crr Wound u-Vsk Project Number: wilt. q-024, SIP► -Pt ,EC4 NOTARY.DOC 4$p CITY Gr RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 3, 1999 • Washington State . Department of Ecology •. • Environmertal Review Section PO Box47iO3 • Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations - Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on June 01, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF The applicant,Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand wand wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total approximately 1,235 sq.ft. The project includes six(6) vacuum stations and three (3) parking spaces. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. Location: 1425 Union Avenue NE. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 21, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (42E) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Z6 Lesley Nisllihir� Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division La ry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources De n Hurter, Department of Transportation Sh rley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Du wamish Tribal Office Red Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agncyltr\— 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 • 60 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer . ;y rl" CITY OF RENTON tr Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 3, 1999 Mr. Robert Downing Architectural Design and Consulting 5707 Parkview Lane Everett,WA 98203 SUBJECT: Sunset Wand Wash Project No. LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Downing: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on June 01, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M)with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 21, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, /)iQ2 J Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Enclosure cc: Parties of Record ZI Corporation/Owners dnsmltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design and Consulting PROJECT NAME: Sunset Wand Wash DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self- service hand wand wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total approximately 1,235 sq.ft. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 3 parking spaces. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1425 Union Avenue NE MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall provide weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation to be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities will be required prior to approval of occupancy for the project. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised drainage plan that addresses the following: A.) Per the KCSWDM, the project must be modified to include either(1) a bioswale, (2) a wetvault, or (3) a combined detention/wet vault system. B.) The release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2 year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100 year storm event. The revised drainage plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 3. A.) The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm. i B.) The applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan which indicates the type, location, and lighting radius for each fixture. The lighting plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Sunset Wand Wash LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF Mitigation Measures and Conditions (continued) Page 2 of 2 CON DITIONS: The Site Plan for the Sunset Wand Wash, File No. LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the folio king conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Mitigation Measures issued with the ERC's June 1, 1999 Threshold Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. 2. The site plan shall be revised to include: A.) The correct dimensions for the east and west property lines. B.) The provision of a 24 foot back out distance for the required parking stalls. Modifications, if necessary, to the parking stall lengths must also be indicated on the revised site plan. C.) The provision of a pedestrian access connection linking the sidewalk to the detail shop and office building. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design and Consulting PROJECT NAME: Sunset Wand Wash DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand wand wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total approximately 1,235 sq.ft. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 3 parking spaces. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1425 Union Avenue NE Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. Refuse and recycle dumpsters are required to be screened by a 6 foot fence or landscaping, or by a combination of both. A screening detail will need to be provided with building permit application. 2. All landscape areas are required to have underground sprinkling systems. 3. All lighting is required to be downcast and shielded so as to illuminate only the development and not create undue glare or reflection of light. Light standards shall not be located so as to interfere with parking stalls, stacking areas and ingress and egress areas. 4. Separate sign permit applications are required for any proposed signage. Parks 1. All landscaping areas outside of property line are to be maintained by the applicant. Building 1. A demolition permit will be required. 2. An oil water separator will be required. 3. Maintain required occupancy separations. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gpm which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional fire hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. Plan Review—Water 1. The site is served by an existing 10"water main located on the east side of Union Avenue NE. The site is in the 565 foot pressure zone and has an approximate static pressure of 74 psi (based on site elevation 393 feet). The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 2. No water main extension will be required for this project. 3. There are two existing fire hydrants located within 300 feet of the proposed building. An additional fire hydrant is required per Fire Department requirements. All three hydrants must comply with current City standards, including Stortz fittings. unset Wand Wash L UA-99-024,SA-A,ECF /,dvisory Notes (continued) F'age 2 of 2 4 . New water meters will be required sized to meet current UPC standards for domestic and irrigation with an RP backflow prevention device for the domestic service and a double check valve assembly for the irrigation service. Water System Development Charges of$0.113 per sq.ft.will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for the project. This project will be eligible for redevelopment credits on comparative sizing of water meters before and after development. Ilan Review—Sewer . The site is currently served by existing sewer mains as follows: 8" main located in Union Ave NE (west side) and 12" main located in an easement south and west of the site. No sewer main extensions will be required for this project. The car wash bays will require a drainage system to collect and direct runoff water to an oiVwater separator with discharge to the sanitary sewer. If the proposed building has rest room facilities, they will need to be connected to the sanitary sewer. The minimum slope for the side sewers shall be 2%. I. Sewer System Development Charges of$0.078 per sq.ft.will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance for the construction permit for the utility improvements required for the project. This project will be eligible for redevelopment credits based on comparative sizing of water meters before and after development. 'Ian Review—Drainage . The applicant will be required to obtain a drainage easement across the property to the south for the storm drain proposed outside of the site's property line. It appears that an HPA permit will be required for this project. We strongly encourage the applicant to contact the FWD to verify this requirement, and to determine if there will be any special conditions placed upon this permit. The FWD may not allow underground facilities for water quality treatment as part of their permit conditions. 3. Surface Water System Development Charges of$0.129 per sq.ft. of new impervious surface will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for this project. Plan Review—Street Improvements 1. Union Ave NE adjacent to the site is currently fully improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk and lighting. No further street improvements are required for this project. 2. All new electrical, phone and cable services to the new buildings must be underground. Plan Review—General 1. All required utility and drainage improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for the construction permit, and the remainder when the permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design and Consulting PROJECT NAME: Sunset Wand Wash DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand wand wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total approximately 1,235 sq.ft. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 3 parking spaces. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1425 Union Avenue NE LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact oil the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section i-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be fled in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 21, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Ap:)eals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of i Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICf TION DATE: June 7, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: June 1, 1999 SIGNATURES: AL!' �S' /- Gregg " merman,Asministrator DATE Deg: ment of Planning/Building/Public Works Oil* r-:77 F im Shepherd, Administrator DATE Community Services , _ ...Z.,ej get• Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief D_.---- - ( 1 f E Renton Fire Department dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APP_ICATION NO(S): LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF APP_ICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design and Consulting PRC JECT NAME: Sunset Wand Wash DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self- sery ce hand wand wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and offia:3 will total approximately 1,235 sq.ft. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 3 parking spaces. The proj( ct requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1425 Union Avenue NE MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall provide weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation to be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities will be required prior to approval of occupancy for the project. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised drainage plan that addresses the following: A.) Per the KCSWDM, the project must be modified to include either(1) a bioswale, (2) a wetvault, or (3) a combined detention/wet vault system. B.) The release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2 year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100 year storm event. The revised drainage plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction permits. 3. A.) The hours of operation for the car wash shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 am and 9:00 pm. B.) The applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan which indicates the type, location, and lighting radius for each fixture. The lighting plan will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee at a rate of$75 per each net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Sunset Wand Wash LUA 99-024,SA-A,ECF Mitic ation Measures and Conditions (continued) Rag( 2 of 2 CONDITIONS: The Site Plan for the Sunset Wand Wash, File No. LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Mitigation Measures issued with the ERC's June 1, 1999 Threshold Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. 2. The site plan shall be revised to include: A.) The correct dimensions for the east and west property lines. B.) The provision of a 24 foot back out distance for the required parking stalls. Modifications, if necessary, to the parking stall lengths must also be indicated on the revised site plan. C.) The provision of a pedestrian access connection linking the sidewalk to the detail shop and office building. The revised site plan is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. hkNIT.* i 5,• e•-t z� Hy Rs Ftil!kisC� ��� ;:,: : : . t.:� rt . • .. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design and Consulting PROJECT NAME: Sunset Wand Wash CESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a si flf-service hand wand wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total approximately 1,235 sq.ft. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 3 parking spaces. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1425 Union Avenue NE Advisory Notes to Applicant: T he following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. -«w _ r; Planning 1 Refuse and recycle dumpsters are required to be screened by a 6 foot fence or landscaping, or by a combination of both. A screening detail will need to be provided with building permit application. 2 All landscape areas are required to have underground sprinkling systems. 3. All lighting is required to be downcast and shielded so as to illuminate only the development and not create undue glare or reflection of light. Light standards shall not be located so as to interfere with parking stalls, stacking areas and ingress and egress areas. 4. Separate sign permit applications are required for any proposed signage. Parks 1 All landscaping areas outside of property line are to be maintained by the applicant. Building 1. A demolition permit will be required. 2 An oil water separator will be required. 3 Maintain required occupancy separations. F re Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gpm which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional fire hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. Plan Review—Water 1 The site is served by an existing 10"water main located On the east side of Union Avenue NE. The site is in the 565 foot pressure zone and has an approximate static pressure of 74 psi (based on site elevation 393 feet). The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 2 No water main extension will be required for this project. 3 There are two existing fire hydrants located within 300 feet of the proposed building. An additional fire hydrant is required per Fire Department requirements. All three hydrants must comply with current City standards, including Stortz fittings. Si inset Wand Wash LUA-99-024,SA-A,E CF A ivisory Notes (continued) P:ige2of2 4. New water meters will be required sized to meet current UPC standards for domestic and irrigation with an RP backflow prevention device for the domestic service and a double check valve assembly for the irrigation service. 5. Water System Development Charges of$0.113 per sq.ft.will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for the project. This project will be eligible for redevelopment credits on comparative sizing of water meters before and after development. P an Review—Sewer 1. The site is currently served by existing sewer mains as follows: 8" main located in Union Ave NE (west side) and 12" main located in an easement south and west of the site. 2. No sewer main extensions will be required for this project. 3, The car wash bays will require a drainage system to collect and direct runoff water to an oilwater separator with discharge to the sanitary sewer. If the proposed building has rest room facilities,they will need to be connected to the sanitary sewer. 4 The minimum slope for the side sewers shall be 2%. 5 Sewer System Development Charges of$0.078 per sq.ft.will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance for the construction permit for the utility improvements required for the project. This project will be eligible for redevelopment credits based on comparative sizing of water meters before and after development. Plan Review—Drainage 1. The applicant will be required to obtain a drainage easement across the property to the south for the storm drain proposed outside of the site's property line. 2. It appears that an HPA permit will be required for this project. We strongly encourage the applicant to contact the FWD to verify this requirement, and to determine if there will be any special conditions placed upon this permit. The FWD may not allow underground facilities for water quality treatment as part of their permit conditions. 3. Surface Water System Development Charges of$0.129 per sq.ft. of new impervious surface will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for this project. P an Review—Street Improvements 1 Union Ave NE adjacent to the site is currently fully improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk and lighting. No further street improvements are required for this project. 2 All new electrical, phone and cable services to the new buildings must be underground. P an Review—General 1 All required utility and drainage improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review ald inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for the construction permit, and the remainder when the permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL The Environmental Review Committee (ERG) has issued a Determination of Non- 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Proposal for a self service hand wand prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language wash in the CN zone. Location: 1425 • continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County unAn Ave. NE. ppeals of either the environmental Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC State of Washington for King County. 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County PM June 21, 1999. If no appeals are filed Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers by ii,is date,both actions will become final. duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a Appealse must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, Sunset Wand Wash 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are gov- erned by City of Renton Municipal Code as published on: 6/7/99 Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$40.25, Office,(425)430-6510. Published in the South County Journal charged to Acct. No. 8051067. ) June 7. 1999.6187 Legal Number 6187 egal le S ut County Jo mal Ky /1 . 4IM Subscribed and sworn before me on this of , 19 `'(5 pi4`GSF,?FlipP �00 PP ONe- r�;���'t E Notary Public of the State of Washington ° • r „ .'�o�a�� residing in Renton = 10— King County, Washington oo_ _ i���PF, /i/A S•t `b NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SUNSET WAND WASH LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF Proposal for a self service hand wand wash in the CN zone. Location: 1425 Union Ave. NE. App of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 21, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Add.tional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Pubication Date: June 7, 1999 Account No. 51067 I NjoTiGE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SUNSET WAND WASH PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA.II,ECF The applicant,Architectural Design&Consulting.is proposing a self•servIce hand wand wash In the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3.247 sq.a.and the detail shop and omce will total approximately 1,235 sg.fl. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 3 parking spaces. The project requires SEPA erMrorsnental review and administrative site plan approval.Location:1425 Union Avenue NE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination(RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11.6501 and/or the land use decision must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 21,1999.If no appeals are flied by this date,both actions will become final Appeals must be Died in writing together with the required 575.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-118. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Cleric's Office,(425)4304510. CONTACT: LESLEY NISHIHIRA.(4251 430-7270 ) � ,y` O \It(�� Cc , O ® •\ oA . s I y M s::.-- rit i - 4)..,' M a t .i I ' i Lr' "t18 h it • _ P ty . el ....9.114), ii:: •e:,n ,1rti'J r I it 40z 2 s: reo Il <, V' rrN i •J 1 i • L/� , KE y ea. P"'.H ��.+a r�.y.u 4 lilt'. 56 7'AW 1 7 �.P' \m . I v1:. `,41'0 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I CERTIFICATION I, 1,st(kC5' l(7atit , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on c)Ukt + I 1.116i • Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Publi , in d for he State of Washington residing in v...r1,16-ti, , on the e day of (q 9 . c...-----2/2--) a....}ty.„. '7 ..---.10 revi_ azift--- MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES Ce9/99 - 10415 - 147th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98059 May 30, 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Ms. Lesley Nishihira City of Renton JUN 03 1999 1005 S. Grady Way RECEIVE Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Nishihira: I know that I am late with these comments, but looking at the Web Page, I see that the ERC is meeting June 1 to discuss this. I hope you bring this up at that meeting. A few things that the ERC may need to know about this area. Honey Creek is in the May Creek Basin area and is an important tributary to May Creek. May Creek is the home of Chinook Salmon, Sockeye Salmon, and other important fish. Students from the Renton School District Elementary Schools -- The Highlands, Sierra Heights, Hazelwood, Maplewood Heights -- plant salmon in Honey Creek and May Creek every Spring. What will this car wash do to these fish? What will the chemicals that come from washing cars do to the salmon? At this time, the National Marine Fisheries Service is writing rules for Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act. The service is now aware of May Creek and its tributaries. What will Renton/this developer do to protect the salmon that use this Creek? What will Renton/this developer tell the students of the Renton School District that the salmon they planted were killed by chemicals from a car wash? Thank you. Sincerely, Dcryne,gg„ Claudia Donnelly PS I will be sending a hard copy of this to you. cc: WSDFW NMFS Washington State DOE LIslie M. Nishihira From: thedonnellys@oo.net Tu: Leslie M. Nishihira Subject: SUNSET WAND WASH Date: Sunday, May 30, 1999 8:57AM 1()415 - 147th Avenue SE RE nton, WA 98059 May 3C--, 1999 M:;. Lesley Nishihira Ci-y of Renton 1 C 05 S. Grady Way Re iton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Nishihira: I know that I am late with these comments, but looking at the Web Page, I sae that the ERC is meeting June 1 to discuss this. I hope you bring this up at that meeting. A few things that the ERC may need to know about this area. Honey Creek is in the May Creek Basin area and is an important tributiary to May Creek. May Creek is the home of Chinook Salmon, So, keye Salmon, and other important fish. Students from the Renton School District Elementary Schools -- The Highlands, Sierra Heights, Ha::elwood, Maplewood Heights -- plant salmon fry in Honey Creek and May CrE ek every Spring. What will this car wash do to these fish? WI-at will the chemicals that come from washing cars do to the salmon? At This time, the National Marine Fisheries Service is writing rules for Sec tion 4 of the Endangered Species Act. The service is now aware of Mai Creek and its tributaries. What will Renton/this developer do to pro:ect the salmon that use this Creek? What will Renton/this deg eloper tell the students of the Renton School District that the salrIon they planted were killed by chemicals from a car wash? The nk you. Sincerely, Claudia Donnelly PS I will be sending a hard copy of this to you. cc: WSDFW NMFS Page 1 Paul Worsham Katie Eichenberger Creekside on Sunset DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3800 NE Sunset Blvd CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98056 MAY 2 4 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira RECEIVED Project Manager Development Set vices Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Nishihira, I am writing to protest the proposed car wash that is to be located in my neighborhood (LUA-99-024, SA-a, ECF). There are currently more than a few vacant properties on sunset that would be more appropriate for a car wash than in a residential area. The property located on the southeastern corner of Sunset Blvd and Union has been abandoned for years. The property located at Sunset Blvd. and Kirkland Ave. NE (next to the eye doctor office) would be a more suitable location. Even locating at the end of the Ace Hardware parking lot(west of Duvall between Taco Bell and McDonalds)would be a viable option. These are just a few suggestions that would preserve our property values,the Honey Creek Greenbelt, and our sense of peace and quiet. The proposed site is located next to high-density residences(condominiums and townhouses located on both the north and south banks of Honey Creek)and would disturb a great number of people. We already have to deal with the excessive noise from the Chevron car wash/dryer/vacuums, and the addition of a similar facility in our residential community would further degrade the environment in which we live. Please keep businesses in zones and locations where they will not negatively impact their neighbors. I would prefer to hear the running of Honey Creek rather than the running of spray washers and industrial vacuums. Thank you for your attention in this matter and please deny the application for this business at the proposed location. • Paul Worsham Ka a i.G,henberger Creekside on Sunset Homeowners Association 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset Paul A.Worsham 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.Unit E-204 P L t >4 _ 0 Renton,WA 98056 tj PM kr) ce 1 eSley / ' / P IJ2Ve��Pt'hP„�l� 5Pievi6P5 T r✓1Sros/ (��� Sr �xr40./ WQf Rwi-o, (vk- g go ss '�$�J'`.•3'•'s,'�4'��S iL�'�`.>_ �Irltrlfr�r��rrrr�r�rr�r�ur�iter�f�f rllfrrtfif�r�rr�r�rr tl�r� DEVELOPMENT Kroh 1NC CITY OF RENTON Creekside on Sunset JUN 1 • 1999 Homeowners Association 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd REGENED Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Froject Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF 'JVhen we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and gre at blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards arc still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. Tha applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset M44i€ ) Mir 41e, ,Z • i i• N ✓ Z a--- � -U—� - is i� , r �----- _...---- J J # /_i/I% + ,r•----.-^��_.�' '1111 • ‘A 6• ,,Z7c, ,/1 .:; ki-if j)-e-r-c---6-ftni_....d St-yfri-e_.-6 osc 6r - t /� ►., , WA , 9 f A `ett 1 +:t-:4. 11,1„1 1,11 3S11,1"111.11.„1,1 11,„1tll1l1.1f1!}fllil -, • DEVELOPMENT PLANNINCJ CITYOFRENTON Creekside on Sunset MAY Homeowners Association 6 1999 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 RECEIVED May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just arc and the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the wat€r gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our hack yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can ::till get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset 1I1EIIIrr IfIITitifI riliIffIii'IfilititIIIffIfhlfli'I11 7„'q.:.1:••+ :.'r..$`1F. • -,e01,b ffeq Jiii..- frp? 61-. 11025 ScO1 ticyg )d Sohn Ja fya.ur40 na,r� GG1i "T Cl r taid le - / 666/ 4.N.\ Arri b? y \\ (5 :1\\ °) W d57c. 7- 2 11 vsn =,■ `6 11 DEVECLIT PI O FNRENTON liti � Creekside on Sunset MAY 6 1999 Homeowners Association 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd RECEIVED Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton. WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our tl homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset ,. orb ii/r) ' i 0 I�-viy) ' S S 5 0 / ( f GI =triwu-- 4-esrr ?-(76. Nam iulir - • i"-...,.,,,�,..�:.�.,�.... 1r�'��. .4 �II'af3-1 lclM ill CIDD T{: a� W d \� �q-s-u-r9 - 3•V. p D�,Q 1.4 1�IC 1.. = vl ter y �a.�n ,\ • • X O)VELOPMENT PLANNING Creekside on Sunset - CITY OF RENTON Homeowners Association MAY 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd 6 1999 Renton, WA 98056 RECEIVED May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of 1 • • the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset 1 - w.-ar * \ Nicolino Ristorante 317NW.Gilman Blvd \ALEwy Issaquah,WA.98027-29.85 �i 1 i --,...r J. s cc 2 4 ►.1;,Y r' '''''._"""' irr- 1 tv a yam- /A A Ne-tS Gtr uf....c P ►Mne r`i- Se,-L/ -�-) �,t v.S 01J VD 5S VV' , k e-.,e2)y w "Y geh b1.) l wPt O ° 5 5 111 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING; CITY OF RENTON MAY Z 6 1999 Creekside on Sunset Homeowners Association RECEIVED 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 IAIs. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 T his letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the Iccation of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer o 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which e\entually would be developed there. Si ice the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, mcre garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our hones, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset • ( 0 1 1 i I i F l 3 I i lit 1 i I{F f t E i i 11 k i i ill ..,:i„,iiim tE „ fl t}( C•^.�t�„:... jam. 11I 1 I � lS b { f1t t = • , 111 Ajr4 • 5 5o I ...-----7--rtpri c ;Ion� fC ' iti --(r4-62_ id 7,,-In TVA illfj,3asu7i$��003£ 1110 Alis Windelev F-102 DEVELOPMENT OF RENTONCES 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd CITYRenton, WA 98056 MAY 2 4 1999 May 20th 1999 RECEIVED Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When I purchased my home located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. In the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time I realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet I took the chance in making this small condominium complex my home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When I received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, I was again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but I also wanted to be a good neighbor and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that I have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from my home, I must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason I purchased my home at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Numerous birds and squirrels come to my back yard feeders and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the • • . meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, my front door almost does open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least my back yard still is an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that I beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, Alis Windelev Alis Windelev _33U 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. F-102 Renton WA 98056 j` 4 o/,iesok-i;le w,9 .6 o .s 7_5 - 4111 PP" • • Creekside on Sunset DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Homeowners Association an(OFRENTON 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd MAX 2. 5 1999 Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 RECEIVED Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just ground the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in air back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you c2:n still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of • • the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and Fr great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset dh r S.'ffa kdgAryAsf¢! PPtbm(T SHERYL KOBAYASHI 14,. , 3800 NE SUNSET BLVD qt-F--(D L RENTON,WA 98056 USA .. . EETINGS 33'A OC I 'In a 0 MS. 1-- C1. EY &l1ge-M-11RA cg, la 44' Perar-c07- t1/44A-I4A- 1,----e- b• y 41 311-,. bEA171-OPNEA 1 r ,S 0 d ES b 10 g 1 O-Ni -.'ER E. &,eA.by \A/A-y rE-ArroAi v7A- 9 8-05 • • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Creekside on Sunset CITY OF RENTON Homeowners Association MAY 1999 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 RECEIVED May 20t" 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise Nhen a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and u iderstood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our hcmes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of r' • • r the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone , drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset . ,,,,,,__ ,.,. , 7 0 0 Creekside on Sunset Homeowners Association 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Ms. Lesley Nishihira MAY 2 4 1999 Project Manager Development Services Division RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset E - 3o _ Vicki McCarron -4-4usa 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E302 Renton WA 98056 ry ,nag 6do-s , t,O,4 q Toss At.v-Sfrip-74'.X1,z • DEVELOPMENT PLANNIN(:4 CITY OF RENTON MAY 2 8 1999 Creekside on Sunset Homeowners Association RECEIVED 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset PMENT PLANN IEV CITY(OF RENTON,NG Creekside on Sunset MAY 5 1999 Homeowners Association 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd �EC�1' E� Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers whc invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creeekkside on Sunset Dana L.Evans t= 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. �'� E-203 :' —_�"_ .` Renton, WA 98056 -�Y MI F - "e koss &r \► ic '--- _e___.rv-\-o vJ c . o s s EaVELOPM EPLANN1Nu Gn.Y OENF RNTON Creekside on Sunset y 1999Homeowners Association 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd RECEIVE � Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our'home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset Jo Ann Berrett �e> , ' ' �� �r ""�Alms:L.': Condo E. 102 --—`�3800 NE Sunset Blvd. ryr �. - Renton,WA 98056 . -__._ _ ''�� o - - rr 1x.._3 (._ L--) ae_xlVuc9.4_,CZ,s1A LC 5 5 , ..:4kciac4i vOD et'540 58 `' sftc,s s/-12 7.ct 11.1f�1�{1�11,��E1=1 1�1 '1,�,1�1s�11�� 1 1�1�1��1 1 11,1 D�jOPM RENTON'OE Creekside on Sunset Homeowners Association MAI 2 4 1999 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd Renton, WA 98056 RECEIVED May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone irives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all :he fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset (.--oLC- hlern►ner ; 3800 NE D'Iset 81vd #�101 • .%iv► �U Renton, WA 98056 '• 1 RISH IMMIGRATION 33 USA r I flv5. LeS� e�f Ii ii ;l . /15_(.4-- M,Cit/na(-5-e: / 0 55 arl'q"(--:-- ItIIIIiII,IliII a iIlIIJIIIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIIIilIIIIIIIIIIIIII,II _A2 — . -" eN711211r7,1'7"14„ - - _ .. . . . . 4 14 Creekside on Sunset DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Homeowners Association CITY OF RENTON 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd 1999 Renton, WA 98056 MAY 24 May 20th 1999 RECEIVED Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the location of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of 1 she meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone irives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all r.he fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset 3 g ©a Al- C. S ugsr eLvd. 1 0 / li MAGNE ERGA -\1`E -.,._ - 3800 NE. SUNSET BLVD #A101 �"'------ --- - i. RENTON, WA 9E056 c) P f�1 u) _.-"""_-__- - 4c r. ccl t . iii . ) ei,Ji . /'�J/ 0 �� P . iNctrvt-o 5j1/V.efO YVk 64 • A SZ/17 it (Th '17 ZICXA scIA)--04-0---, ,,, -- S 93r, n 4,.....,c7j, 20,-,-./ ... l DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Creekside on Sunset t1AY Z 5 1999 Homeowners Association 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd RECEIVED Renton, WA 98056 May 20th 1999 Ms. Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 This letter is written in protest to the proposed building of a car wash at the ocation of 1425 Union Ave. N. E. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF When we purchased our homes located at 3800 N.E. Sunset Blvd. in the summer of 1995, there was an empty lot located on the corner of Sunset and Union. At the time we realized that any number of different businesses could be built on that corner, yet we took the chance in making this small condominium complex our home, in the hope that it would be a good neighborhood establishment which eventually would be developed there. Since the lot had previously been a gas station, it did not come as any surprise when a new Chevron station went up, though it was a disappointment to now have a neighbor with bright florescent lighting and customers who invariably throw their garbage on our property as well as hang out in our gazebo. When we received the Notice of Application for the Chevron station to add a car wash to the property, we were again dismayed. More inconsiderate customers, more garbage and more noise, but we also wanted to be good neighbors and understood the owners wanting to make a profitable enterprise. Now that we have received a notice regarding another car wash to be built just around the corner from the Chevron station and just across the creek from our homes, we must protest. More bright lights, more loud noise and more garbage being tossed over the side of Honey Creek. The main reason we purchased our homes at this location is because Honey Creek is still a lovely little haven. On Sunday mornings, when the traffic noise quiets down and the car wash has not started yet, you can actually hear the water gurgling over the rocks. Squirrels and many different bird varieties live in our back yards and when hiking along the creek-bed further down stream, you can still get away from the noise of the road above and enjoy the quiet solitude of the meandering stream. Foxes, opossums, coyotes, ducks and even deer and great blue herons can still be found along this sanctuary. Yes, our front doors almost do open onto a four-lane highway where everyone drives at least 10 miles above the speed limit and throws their garbage from all the fast food chains onto the bushes along our fence. But at least our back yards are still an escape from the strip malls and their many contaminants. The applicant for this land use will undoubtedly argue that Honey Creek will not be polluted by another car wash since all drainage will be restricted according to regulations. However, water run off is only one significant problem with building an unnecessary business establishment on the proposed site, which up till now has been a residential property. Having seen, and picked up on a daily basis, all the trash that the general public discards over the hillside, "out of sight, out of mind" onto Honey Creek, it is with a heavy heart that we beg you not to allow this project to be built. Not now or any time in the future. The properties along Honey Creek that are now residential should remain residential, so that we may all be able to enjoy honey Creek for generations to come. Sincerely, The homeowners at Creekside on Sunset � �303 fVY O CITY OF RENTON 1?c, FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: May 14, 1999 TO: Lesley Nishihira, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Sunset Wand Wash, 1425 Union Av. NE Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 2250 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$2,330.64 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 1111"‘y City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWIN 3 DEPARTMENT: /. r e--1 f€, COMMENTS DUE: MAY 25, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 11 ,1999 APPLICAN a: Robert Downing/Architectural Design & PROJECT MANAGER: LeNishihira Consulting PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Wand Wash WORK ORDER NO: 78496 LOCATION: 1425 Union Avenue NE SITE ARE!: 24,886 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ex-structures to be demolished BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 4,482 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in the CN wne. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total apprxoimately 1,235 sq.ft. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVII'ONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of t ie Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environmen Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreli ne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Rescumes Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet A.) A- B. POLh:Y-RELATED COMMENTS 4 C. COD1 RELATED COMMENTS dl-e.ej We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition information is ne to properly assess this proposal. Signature of irector or Authoriz Repr ntative Date 37/A Y19 7 DEVAPP Rev.10/93 �I I II I I II City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWIN3 DEPARTMENT: WhOn COMMENTS DUE: MAY 25, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 11, 1999 c frig, APPLICANT` Robert Downing/Architectural Design & PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira RP,-- "c oN Consulting PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Wand Wash WORK ORDER NO: 78496 Q 2 / I99g LOCATION: 1425 Union Avenue NE UI*-"IIV(Z�,`V/S'oN SITE ARE': 24,886 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ex-structures to be demolished BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 4,482 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total apprxoimately 1,235 sq.ft. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of t ie Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environmen Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Wafer Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoroll,a Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Rose aces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLh W-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODDE'-RELATED COMMENTS( We have rev ewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add cnal information is needed to operiy assess this proposal. 1711‘..e. ,•')'---///7 7 lure of Direct;or Authorized Represents e, Date 9- APP Rev.10/93 1-6 0040*0115 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWIN 3 DEPARTMENT:gm • TA/ • COMMENTS DUE: MAY 25, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 11, 1999 APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design & PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira Consulting PROJECT'TITLE: Sunset Wand Wash WORK ORDER NO: 78496 LOCATION 1425 Union Avenue NE SITE AREA: 24,886 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ex-structures to be demolished BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 4,482 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in the CN .:one. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total apprxoimately 1,235 sq.ft. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVII'ONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of tie Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environmen, Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Lanci/Shorelir a Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmenti I Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Reso uces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLIC'Y-RELATED COMMENTS tvJ0 ;' c.-( SSu& 5 - C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi' eded to properly assess this proposal. �j /�(� `a.J/ 1.3� / Signature of ctor or Authized epresentative Date DEVAPP I UUUUUU Rev 10/93 I City of Re......I Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWINI 3 DEPARTMENT: 170 I ` Gesto COMMENTS DUE: MAY 25, 1999 APPLICATI:DN NO: LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 11, 1999 APPLICAN'": Robert Downing/Architectural Design & PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira Consulting PROJECT•-ITLE: Sunset Wand Wash WORK ORDER NO: 78496 LOCATION 1425 Union Avenue NE SITE AREA 24,886 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ex-structures to be demolished BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 4,482 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in the CN ;cone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total apprxoimately 1,235 sq.ft. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIF'ONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of be Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shorelir a Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environment/I Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Reso.vices Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C1-5 • �l2/7ttGiL U in n2c tatp.cf n paict s,ervtca4 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have revs,wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio)al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of DirectorAriAuthorized Representative Date DEVAPP Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: argb6 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 25, 1999 APPLICAT ON NO: LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 11, 1999 APPLICAN f: Robert Downing/Architectural Design & PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira Consulting PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Wand Wash WORK ORDER NO: 78496 LOCATION: 1425 Union Avenue NE SITE AREJ.: 24,886 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ex-structures to be demolished BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 4,482 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in the CN ►one. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total apprxoimately 1,235 sq.ft. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of t ie Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environmen' Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLIIt:Y-RELATED COMMENTS 740 C. C Di"-RELATED COMMENTS We have rev ewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additicnal information is needed to erly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date t 9 P J Si DEVAPP Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET °90e REVIEWIN 3 DEPARTMENT: Him 1eSL)COMMENTS DUE: MAY 25, 1999 APPLICATI DN NO: LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 11, 19etvELopmE44T SERVICEC APPLICAN'': Robert Downing/Architectural Design & PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley NishihiraCJTY OF RENTON Consulting PROJECT -ITLE: Sunset Wand Wash WORK ORDER NO: 78496 MAY 14 1999 LOCATION 1425 Union Avenue NE RECEIVED SITE AREA: 24,886 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ex-structures to be demolished BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 4,482 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in the CN ,:one. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total apprxoimately 1,235 sq.ft. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVI!ONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of t ie Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environmen Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandiShorelii e Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environment,il Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resc pees Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLIi;Y-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /v. add ttoi4a( -five Ii Iv� U� he er�'d S eP S )(eiL ae,f/Gt,0. We have rep owed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed//too�properly assess this proposal. e/(i CW/7? 5- / Signature of )irector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP Rev.10/93 vt L345i14$4.41 tikt±‘,1 r I lil kAltAiS City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 25, 1999 APPLICAT ON NO: LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 11, 1999 APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design & PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira L'/j). Consulting PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Wand Wash WORK ORDER NO: 78496 Ai9 vA rJ IDA, i Y'7'; LOCATION: 1425 Union Avenue NE etl `b(f 79�9 SITE ARE/: 24,886 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ex-structures to btiliOrrisMhed BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 4,482'§OZSio SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand carwnr sh in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total apprxoimately 1,235. sq.ft. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of t ie Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environmen Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shorelir,e Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environment l Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Reso./roes Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLI(:Y-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 3-ee 5-emiczie Me WO' We have rev,awed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. li (11 104# Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP Rev.10/93 all)(15 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works w ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT711raielcitekRin COMMENTS DUE: MAY 25, 1999 APPLICAT ON NO: LUA-99-024, SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 11, 1999 APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design & PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nish hl�i(rifor Consulting Rkf,ia.rRElyrata PROJECT TITLE: Sunset Wand Wash WORK ORDER NO: 78496 LOCATION: 1425 Union Avenue NE Ailtiki799,g SITE ARE/: 24,886 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ex-structates,a► eemmolliished BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): � E"`� `. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total apprxoimately 1,235 sq.ft. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of tie Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreli,e Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environment:1 Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resc irces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE.-RELATED COMMENTS S-e2 Sepa / 14/1r1/140 . We have rev awed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additic 7al info0 ation is needed to property assess this proposal. DD� Lf16' 5/z���l�t Signature of I)irector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: MAY 12, 1999 TO: LESLEY NISHIHIRA FROM: NEIL WATTS SUBJECT: SUNSET WAND WASH- 1425 UNION AV NE SITE PLAN AND SEPA REVIEW I have reviewed the project submittal for the above listed project, and have the following comments at this time: SEWER • The site is currently served by existing sewer mains as follows: 8" main located in Union Ave NE (west side) and 12" main located in an easement south and west of the site. • No sewer main extension will be required for this project. • The car wash bays will require a drainage system to collect and direct runoff water to an oil/water separator with discharge to the sanitary sewer. If the proposed building has rest room facilities, they will need to be connected to the sanitary sewer. • The minimum slope for the side sewers shall be 2%. • Sewer System Development Charges of $0.078 per sq.ft. will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for project. This project will be eligible redevelopment credits based on comparative sizing of water meters before and after development. WATER • The site is served by an existing 10" water main located on the east side of Union Ave NE. The site is in the 565 foot pressure zone and has an approximate static pressure of 74 psi (based on site elevation of 393 feet). The project is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. • No water main extension will be required for this project. MAY 12, 1999 PAGE 2 • There are two existing fire hydrants located within 300 feet of the proposed building. An additional fire hydrant is required per Fire Department requirements. All three hydrants must comply with current City standards, including Stortz fittings. • New water meters will be required sized to meet current UPC standards for domestic and irrigation with an RP backflow prevention device for the domestic service and a double check valve assembly for the irrigation service. • Water System Development Charges of $0.113 per sq.ft. will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for the project. This project will be eligible redevelopment credits based on comparative sizing of water meters before and after development. DRAINAGE • The development site is adjacent to Honey Creek, and proposed to discharge surface runoff from the site to the creek. A drainage report and conceptual drainage plan has been submitted with the site plan application. The proposed drainage plan includes detention, per the KCSWM, but proposes the use of a stillwater sump in lieu of standard water quality treatment provisions. This is not acceptable. Per the KCSWM, the project must be modified to include either (1) a bioswale, (2) a wetvault, or (3) a combined detention/wet vault system. • It appears that an HPA permit will be required for this project. We strongly encourage the applicant to contact the FWD to verify this requirement, and to determine if there will be any special conditions placed upon this permit. The FWD may not allow underground facilities for water quality treatment as part of their permit conditions. • Due to the proximity of this project to Honey Creek, special attention will be required on monitoring the erosion and sedimentation control measures during site construction. We recommend the following condition be placed on this project: "Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to approval of occupancy for the project." • Due to erosion problems within the Honey Creek channel, additional mitigation is recommended for this project. We recommend the following condition be placed on this project: "The release rate for the developed site shall be limited to 50% of the predeveloped 2 year 24 hour storm event through the 2 year storm event, with a safety factor of 10% in the detention volume. The release rates for the developed site shall be limited for the 5 year, 10 year and 100 year storm event to the predeveloped rates for those events, with a 30% safety factor for the 100 year storm event." • Surface Water System Development Charges of $0.129 per sq.ft. of new impervious surface will be required for this project. This fee will be due upon issuance of the construction permit for the utility improvements required for project. MAY 12, 1999 PAGE 3 STREET IMPROVEMENTS • Union Av NE adjacent to the site is currently fully improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk and lighting. No further street improvements are required for this project. • All new electrical, phone and cable services to the new buildings must be undergrounded. • Traffic mitigation fees of$10,875 will be required prior to issuance of the building permit for this project. GENERAL INFORMATION • All required utility and drainage improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. • Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for the construction permit, and the remainder when the permit is issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. 37i 2 OC1 Det 4111r41111M:V.:;':.- . • 3,-...R t.,,,-...:.,-„,„..,,-,,,,,:,:5,..,-.:„: yp., . . „JAW.° illik . 0 op JP A • • F5, TFIANSPORTATT A I SON FEE ...'. , Project Name 5tat€A 1J4 1,td £Ot SJ1 Project Address 1 r12 5 tAircli Au ATE • Contact Person kohC✓'(. 1)or,etirvll Address 5 7D 7 Pa,/k thew G.tivie , E✓ems 6?&62 3 Phone •Number 4 25 - 3 4 g - 5277 . Permit Number L L - R(i- v2.1 Project Description Se- SCvve Ceti/ war ( (.., be ) a/ta Acta,/ Slop (2 tar) but cy_ex e (76 !2 3 5 �t . Ov r' e/X/57;tu, /lc)'CU Zv he ✓'e kovve . Land Use Type: , Method of Calculation: I 5'+ec11t Pe`°''I Hcx ❑ Residential CITE Trip Generation Manual ' ' 5 iv,Fs ea,/ l;A—€ (3/Retail 0 Traffic Study I Cc,. telasti C3'n) ❑ Non-retail 0 Other 1 • I rvg tr,vs Fet be - 1h.s,rtKc 'Z( • Calculation: 6a•1 Welsh rmcte l 56p flntue C P+'rwruvy 4u7o .e CeHlr� Cgy0)Pl /33 1:et Rea) doh tv,p; = [c )(io )(c.w)7f r 1 . 149,0 daily 1vtps - Ali. $7. R-tA Ai)1l11 tv 1 p • ( iq5) «75) — 1 1u , 875 . c'z � ` o Transportation Mitigation Fee: 1 !D r 7 Calculated by: A) ((AV/ Date: 5/21/4 J Account Number: lO&• :- 31Q. 04. Date of Payment 4• CITY L i RENTON ..LL s,,,V Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 11, 1999 Mr. Robert Downing Architectural Design and Consulting 5707 Parkview Lane Everett, WA 98203 SUBJECT: Sunset Wand Wash Project No. LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Downing: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 1, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, /, l,- /1 )Z�' V Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: ZI Corporation/Owners ACCPTUR 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 IIIr CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION (LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PRJJECT NAME: Sunset Wand Wash APPLICATION NO: LUA ' 19 • 024, SA-Y21i I The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Erik Pehr Ebenhard Backman 14408 SE May Valley Road,Renton 98059 342405-9089 Curtis Bates 1150 Tacoma Avenue NE,Renton 98056 106150-0540 C E Boydston 3920 NE 11th Place,Renton 98056 106105-0600 Jean Bryant 3928 NE 11th Place,Renton 98056 106150-0580 James Davis 1160 Tacoma Avenue NE,Renton 98056 106150-0560 C Dennis&Bernadene Dochnahl 2006 Redmond Avenue NE,Renton 98056 741940-0010 Dennis Dochnahl 13020 Lake Kathleen Road SE,Renton 98059 182306-9191 Thomas&Rhonda Donohue 3900 NE 11th Place,Renton 98056 106105-0610 Douglas Kyes 3924 NE 11th Place,Renton 98056 106150-0590 • Albert Gordon McCaleb 3932 NE 11th Place,Renton 98056 106105-0570 • Metropolitan Investments L.L.C. 1420 5th Avenue#2628, Seattle 98101 032305-9049 James Edward Snider 4111 NE Sunset Blvd.,Renton 98056 032305-9012 Dennis Spiry 11832142d Avenue SE,Renton 98059 102305-9058 Unocal Corporation PO Box 7600,Los Angeles, CA 90051 Everett&Donna Butler 4010 NE 12th Street,Renton 98056 042305-9235 Dalpay Properties L.L.C. 4033 NE Sunset Blvd.,Renton 98056 042305-9245 Edwin Bailey Goebel 3924 NE 12th Street,Renton 98056 042305-9067 James Volk 4000 NE 12th Street,Renton 98056 James&Wendy Allen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E104,Renton 98056 182350-0170 Jo Ann Berrett 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E102,Renton 98056 182350-0150 Sherie Brown&Mary Macnamera 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #B103,Renton 98056 182350-0040 Magne&Klara Erga 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #A101,Renton 98056 182350-0010 Dana Evans 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E203,Renton 98056 182350-0200 George&Frances Kobayashi 7033 S.Lake Ridge Drive, Seattle 98178. 182350-0260 Peter&Roberta Lorenz 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #B 104,Renton 98056 182350-0050 ' Vicki McCaron 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E302,Renton,98056 182350-0230 E J&Katherine McCambridge 12919 NE 203`d Court,Woodinville 98072 182350-0180&-0250 Gregory Paddock 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #B103,Renton 98056 182350-0160 Erin Petersen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #B101,Renton 98056 182350-0140 Derek Schaubroeck 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #C102,Renton 98056 182350-0070 Shirlee Schlemmer 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #B101,Renton 98056 182350-0020 Jayne Schraw 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E101,Renton 98056 182350-Q 40 Lisa Schroeppel 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #D102,Renton 98056 182350 tea I. ENT PLAr., ,V Cheryl Shaw 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #B102,Renton 98056 182350-M3i' kENTON FEB 2 2 1,29 RECEIVED (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Pt'l-TN fjpI/ " L./VW NA ,r ,G t (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Adele Turner 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E303,Renton 98056 182350-0240 Richard&Marie Valdrighi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #D106,Renton 98056 182350-0130 Fredrick&Rosalee Walton 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #D101,Renton 98056 182350-0080 • • Todd k Evan Watkins 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #D103,Renton 98056 182350-0100 Mary Elizabeth Whalen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E202,Renton 98056 182350-0190 Mary Catherine White 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #C101,Renton 98056 182350-0060 Alis Vl'indelev 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.#F102, Renton 98056 182350-0270 Paul Worsham 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E204,Renton 98056 182350-0210 Both Young& Sang Mi Yim 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.#D104,Renton 98056 182350-0110 Applicant Certification 1, 1 obert C. Downing , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: Cl City of Renton Technical Services Records ❑ Title Company Records ZI King County Assessors Records Signed Date (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the day of , 19 . Signed (Notary Public) ****For:City of Renton Use:** .CERTIFICATION:;OF MAILING 1, ' .hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed•toi (City Employee? each listed property ow er on �.. Sign Date. ed �. t ..,...:. NOTARY ATTEST l Subscribed and sworn before me, a.Notary Public, in and for the;State of Washington residing at on the day of , 19> Signed. _... listprop.doc REV 07/95 2 MAY-12-1999 13:44 CITY OF RENTON 425 430 7300 P.01/01 (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Adele Turner 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E303,Renton 98056 182350-0240 Richard&Marie Valdrighi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #41'26, Renton 98056 182350-0130. Fredrick&Rosalee Walton 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.#D101, Renton 98056 I82350-0080 Todd&Evan Watkins 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #D103,Renton 98056 182350-0100 Mary Elizabeth Whalen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E202,Renton 98056 182350-0190 Mary Catherine White 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.#C 101,Renton 98056 182350-0060 Ali s Windelev 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #F 102, Renton 98056 182350-0270 Pas!Worsham 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. #E204,Renton 98056 182350-0210 Bcth Young& Sang.vi Yirn 3800 NE Sunset Blvd #D104,Renton 98056 182350-0110 Applicant Certification Robert C. Downing , hereby certify that the above lists) of adjacent property (Print Name) )wners and their addresses were obtained from: C1 City of Renton Technic& Services Records D Title Company Records -- King County Assessors Records Si ne� ate _S 9' • g P L c� (Applicant) -... NOTARY ATTEST Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the.State of Washington, 'esiding at C.L !1w�(--( on the i,Lday of /-,0L L _, 19 7. Signed ,c11_,Lt p,� �VIC' - t ti MARGARET McINELLY l (Notary Public). T t'R1 r�li'CI i° r1 Pff V1', tMk 1�fF c•E r(l1CAT(ON OF MAltINls f'ereby r e ;fy that r,cti 9S ff the pr>>poted alpplicai(21 ever,: trial!r L:; "'"•.v tmplrxyae, tack iistad p!Cperty V.Ainc.' Or Ezra � 4 3. Data, .v,.. I 'ay I; r` .f ° E >i { ° TTE'T Sc ri e.' and SV 6frw' bete re R d ri tarp P%- i., 'a. l@ •Stat (if, U°la4(1ln tqh.. t I t 1 eS,riin at 6n the _da ,F tr� ,1`` istprvp.doc ZEY U 7/96 RECEIVED TOTAL P.01 MHY-12-1999 13:44 CITY OF RENTON 425 430 7300 F.01/01 • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Adele Turner 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.#E303, Renton 98056 182350-0240 Richard&Marie Valdrighi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.#D,19.6,Renton 98056 182350'-0130. Free;rick&Roselee Walton 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.#D101,Renton 98056 182350-0080 Todd&Evan Watkins 3800 NE%inset Blvd.#D103,Renton 98056 182350-0100 Mat y Elizabeth Whalen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.0E202, Renton 98056 182350-0190 Mai y Catherine White 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.*C 101,Renton 98056 182350-0060 Alis Wiindelev 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.#F 102,Renton 98056 182350-0270 Pau Worsham 3800 NE Sunset Blvd.00E204,Renton 98056 182350-0210 Batt Young&Sang Mi Yim 3800 NE Sunset Blvd. 00D104,Renton 98056 182350-0110 Applicant Certification 1, Robert C. Downing , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Nome) o Nners and their addresses were obtained from: C1 City of Renton Technical Services Records - • - .- 0 Title Company Records • King County Assessors Records -- 2 k7 S gne pate l ," , (Applicant /-- , -•‘. • NOTARY r ATTESTEQ: Subscribed and sv orn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, re siding at on the if-)...,,day of y4 �-P 1 , 19 127 • S gned (2.&.-cC' Q MARGARET McINELLY ! (Notary Publio) Ali► _ V zay., i;,•ri� v M. "7•I`C°r f'of J�Y 111e,,151'� 'e� ..4 } • X Sys iY I 1ti•9' ' i C ,rs k r' a ''. .1 , u r I dT.IrA Irk lfi!�Is ',# i ke I. u nls3 .� 41` �•{�k\! • 141 Ysil I III 1:11 ! f iii .1 t�s'Q Wlkk'i 341441 .41 �y i . . i 1 11 1 V 4�4.; s. + b P.M 0 0kr • 3t.4;:;tio 1 GI itl� 9$ pyr�,li 1+I I p' r • 7" �'�1!:A., !1:;.0' 0��{11 !�T. 91U14�I IIrOd II?1r9II ijry:II V I l.i:F +; } C I I ft: fk flfitn rll4 1;Yn� M� �WI!:k I ,111 1 1fl �I� �' / �IIM II Ic 'j� � " k •3^ "� ,` n I akH�r�liw ' f7vl�p 1r4111U�1If R{I �p y .vim m k� A IVN I I{'l V • 5 1 I F t I i l l h ,q 2,.� 1 4 I '�f,i, . 419•�i!'. � I It,`,' 4 11f 11y1 IEJ a 4' + I S."r%;� hAIIFI{II,IIM�IN,91� "'' Atll1 1.p.II�4.,:;•1 • 4 1101:. 0' uT N��H *IyhlMllryhl Iflyl�iltt pp �Sr1 II I - 7�,,�,� y �v,1 9t 7l'a C' � i•.���?:F !'� I � A 9����ia ^11�IJ�1,� 1 Yinr J d I I 1�1' � 1 N < ,11, ;IM�Ir;I.�r;����I �I, 1�� � . h. <..'kF•1J {�• 1. 1 1 I 'i 11i { 11.1�„ 3 F .,{,j'4 L S, P ar Nr 9 4 t r X• i I•) bl Ik•� P 11 I11, (d I J ktoilSv � I I I I P,�I I 1•jl ,k s e /.! 11 1 • ! 1 e " t'T'4r b r` I l d p .:% tb :7 41 `rl:1;ed r :< ti 4 I I • •�� �I i�� ��f � -. � 11 II Y 1 MMI.����J.,�1��� V�FMf I � P` M.r Mi^ 1 r,l/,,1� Y l/h *1�, M 1�' (!� { "_ Aa,4{ ��•?{(1�71�R,'� I1 (III J1111 4III 11'w.ro-. I,N i1q,1� a r';1 L T11 11 1 e`. • 1 fa ry 1,. I�y , '. ;10 ♦V11(rl nh rl 1p ,i41 f• } ag:!,C7 ,ll� : r 41 I (1 t, a .,:'. F� `,M y .,iy� t k fi s.,. . 1',,,,�y 1 p li,.ilk<x :. ^� {;11 9A 1 r 1 4,1 Ir f 'MFr\ , 1 f,"SS r - i, 1 r �, 0 .p !. 1 T ,,. i' , C 1 1 k p 1 n. »I�iaw uaY,rrx 11x la 1I Fllite to aY�7, y, ! , sl Ml lit ••• 1 I}y"k l "rlgt ,'t r f r.11 .... .,, i Iw ai Ir h I i ,�b'Sl4f3 MThrJ +111 t! i E'I "ixrr ,ri.1 � 1 { r ` 1dl M • +s x( k n 7s S 1+I 1 I. • M {{A4(�i» i i lot +1 J{ iliP :E • 15a04 v �: �, +}}R Y t". • 1 44... O+d .J ? 1 rF 1�1� " + r I i!I+y Pry .,r' w4�,'S a •dr:!•'• 1` 11 w: dk ' !i w«.l • \ , 1 I • • • r' 1 3" fYfry :"">41'I4'. n,1: a 1 1„,pt.M �v , ., "`, `,,, INI`� +•',^M.: ,a, ' Y' 'a•.t ,h1 ,i 4 I,ytii "•Jxh. 1aTla 1,,,,,,%; .'rv, r hA .14% ;4, 3 •"�44,04i�• '31M,'.I1 1t 1i; Nir. l` n4 i( , <�J.. i�tl, t '1. n:i r.tgl �µyi.') ,iy�( • i l'}t'� .'r . <r'< J��' i:. �� :I Ill I I ; ���. r � �,y 11� f.� 'y.S �'"� .5�f��1+�}rrV�..," alroi� w a,191�pe �y;>�' - A rSlno:.... �:..:,' t 1 .4 a S:. • .7-4 ;I,IPAf11 " kj'11.-+�(9i3O.,Sra I •tit+rakl TLy,J. Ali, ik,.. I r ,iol W{ ;1 r�.• y,J45...`' �1 ,.w'.. w ...W S• ,. h f5 N'1.Ll.. Y r�v I�1 r�I nl��1'1� 1 1 �I � � p t ;�'y'.'G I w,+ d � '�t:�' �,'1r.Mr"'r,.�i k�GrJV' S��t� �,,..I N .,tip S iu a�n.�. + A� >ii I r ,.t I K''' ah;'," I x I '19F m nld I d:� w.s;ie.«y,L , 1 "� 2 ,.' . ! \ 11 tl 1t I I h' ^t !1 '-f � h ,2': ... 111 t, �' I4 b� 1 g ,k F. 4,4 �`p •+ q ; t>�e y /r «N far. �II �1 +4 ; tQ••f!`k`a � x � i �Y Sk�P'I IIdIa� �� 1{1E fx�d i" 4� 9ca4 ' f N Y? e xl 114g1. r M1tN 4M1 } .{dsM late M1MII I41 7i "S?na:.k a 1'II(W+ AxAS.ti �''.txo q gd ` x d.`"�'pry"'k: • • • • • ' : ... • .+ ___e ' r ' j , I . l 1J ' WIuiji,:4r rJ1•:* Xiiij f 1 k 1 x! T NrM^ '''''. i•?N W �h " * .',.V , �q:<a»u x � ✓ Z . y*„,! rx , 1 ♦ lrk , 5;4,11M ti.`.. 1 AdIpit .1a: YeiyF, ,._..k •,v.a Si ., 1." n4 N ;p«?Ryv h , !.?. ? fi.. w S �+ ;=.:41,n p r u _A.� a + +1, 1; . , sn"li ,VaWk :: i . RE V 07/55 2 TOTAL P.01 ASSESSOR MAP o -" ' s , .�+.. _`0 3 \e2! Tb . 6e 0 . Jr t• y ! 1 24`,'i N 9� e,s4o von.• pI 4 i�oi. .i •b 1-C, M ii c70 al L 14) .F�•.4d,R Ti �s ,, /a .,.s V G4 P O r• 3 �� s .6 s i Xi'*I d �3 n I• `O ; a0 011 V A t k AO diO t`i� (R) $ tin hr)Rai 44,4 4eao d .mom wr k.• . f011270 o_a .!' At0O.0O 4+a►.y 30 o. /le° P di,B t- oe.i4 MP` W.rt Ile.as CM Nw ,river P ilt L tool iTa.4• Z3a9 7t!•4P WO 1 at 44) M e? Mild ---'... k `,3 40'' i cl \e r- ----1 259985 t ;;Wi.os.4o* A•s.eik , ,L 40 FORBSTBR�K; TOWNHOUS _DIt4 �� tVC� .41/20- 26 „, .di..0,-#®w 75 CO �1 PHASE 'vat..42179-80 k tse.t7 "" ti �. #yl�+4.dti 6.'yr< PHASE 2 ` o $ b "41 u1 `y a� , It f t 4 ,�' K _I Jo Rr�� y S4 O. \� I- /2 9./7 , o t A. i i� r� ,k s i1r 1 � o e .a I � �4o �Ohyeri fJ ht � tci.,‘,1,,k4C +fw rRtCj{� Y Subject40 ` NI n Fray;'+ ,'loN� ,�A� T� /� ; va7,0 °1� ✓Set 4 1 .S s!-te.51:2'. Tc�,10 f� 40 C-- y +"+., ? CI ° k — , ......... i4_21 ilk 106. a ` te 1 e ( 1. it • 9 � o. l'' . -f+ 4.l r4 O I d YI 0 Tp /77 I r264 e 41 1 1 6 Ill•JroH _- 367! I • $� LAMB UANSON LAMB 1 5 APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES.INC. Professional Peal Estate Appraiser(and Consultant, 6^4HZ5 L1r on riv(.. E G°'t . R erg -c c , \Al A 9 BccI • Erik Pehr EbenhardBackman Curtis Bates C E Boydston 14408 SE May Valley Rd 1150 Tacoma Ave NE 3920 NE 11th Place Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Jean Bryant James Davis C Dennis&Bernadene Dochnahl 3928 NE 11`s Place 1160 Tacoma Ave NE 2006 Redmond Ave NE Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Thomas&Rhonda Donohue Douglas Kyes Albert Gordon McCaleb 3900 NE 11t PI 3924 NE 11t PI 3932 NE 11th PI Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Dennis Dochnahl METROPOLITAN INVESTMENTS L.L.C. James Edward Snider 13020 Lake Kathleen Rd SE 1420 5th Ave#2628 4111 NE Sunset Blvd Renton,WA 98059 Seattle,WA 98101 Renton,WA 98059 Dennis Spiry UNOCAL CORPORATION Everett&Donna Butler 11832 142nd Ave SE PO Box 7600 4010 NE 12a'St Renton,WA 98059 Los Angeles,CA 90051 Renton,WA 98056 DALPAY PROPERTIES L.L.C. Edwin Bailey Goebel James Volk 4033 NE Sunset Blvd 3924 NE 12th St 4000 NE 12th St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 James&Wendy Allen Jo Ann Berrett Sherie Brown&Mary Macnamera 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E104 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E102 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#B103 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Magne&Klara Erga Dana Evans George&Frances Kobayashi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#A101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E203 7033 S Lake Ridge Dr Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Seattle,WA 98178 Peter&Robert Lorenz Vicki McCaron E J&Katherine McCambridge 3800 NE Sunset Blvd 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E302 12919 NE 203`d Ct Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Woodinville,WA 98072 Gregory Paddock Erin Petersen Derek Schaubroeck&Jessica Robertiello 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E103 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#C102 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 • • J Shirlee Schlemmer Jayne Schraw Lisa Schroeppel 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#B101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D102 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Cheryl Shaw Adele Turner Richard&Marie Valdrighi 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#B102 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#E303 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D106 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Fredrick&Rosalee Walton Todd&Evan Watkins Mary Elizabeth Whalen 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D103 3800 NE Sunset Blvd Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Mary Catherine White Alis Windelev Paul Worsham 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#C101 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#F102 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#-204 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Born Young& Sang Mi Yim 3800 NE Sunset Blvd#D104 Renton,WA 98056 CITY Or? RENTON 1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 11, 1999 Mr. Robert Downing Architectural Design and Consulting 5707 Parkview Lane Everett, WA 98203 SUBJECT: Sunset Wand Wash Project No. LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Downing: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 1, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, �( ��, /01) Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: ZI Corporation/Owners ACCrTLTR 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 : CITY vF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 3, 1999 Robert C. Downing Architectural Design and Consulting 5707 Parkview Lane Everett, WA 98203 Subject: Sunset Wand Wash File No. LUA-99-024, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Downing: Thank you for your recent land use application for the Sunset Wand Wash. In order to accept and review this proposal, we will need the following information: 1. The project is required to maintain a 25 foot setback from the ordinary high water mark of Honey Creek and is prohibited from clearing or developing any portion of this setback. All of the plans submitted (site plan, landscape plan, grading plan, and utilities plan) will need to show the correct setback, including rockeries and landscaping. 2. If the proposal includes development on two parcels, then the plans will need to be revised to show the entire project site (both parcels in their entirety) and any existing buildings. 3. The revised site plan should also show building, parking stall, and aisle dimensions as well as the correct information in the project information table (e.g., proposed building square footage). 4. A legal description and parcel number for the second parcel will need to be included on the Master Application. A title report for the additional property will also need to be submitted. 5. The Neighborhood Map will need to show the correct boundaries for the project site. Please contact me if you would like to correct the submitted maps rather than produce new copies. 6. The Environmental Checklist submitted is not complete and does not contain a signature (one of the copies must be an original signature). It is important that the information provided in the checklist accurately reflects the proposal (e.g., (A.11) description does not match plans and (B.1.h.) does not match grading plan) and that all questions are answered. 7. The project narrative and construction mitigation description are not consistent with the plans. Please correct these and any other plans or reports so that the specifics of the project are consistent throughout the application. 1055 South�� Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 (R)This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer U. We will also need new PMTs for the revised plans. The PMTs submitted for the Neighborhood Map can also be corrected without producing new ones. U. The applicant should note that because the project will straddle property lines, a restrictive covenant prohibiting the sale of the parcels separately will be required as a condition of approval. As an alternative to the restrictive covenant, a lot line adjustment which either places the dividing line appropriately between the developments or removes the line and creates one parcel can be recorded. Either one of these options can be completed before a decision is issued for the project and will also prevent the need for conditioning the approval. 10. A Hydraulic Permit Approval (HPA) may be required from the state Department of Fish and Wildlife for any storm water discharge into Honey Creek. At this time your application has not been accepted and the materials submitted February 22, 1999 will remain on hold. We will need the information listed above (#1-8) in order to formally accept and initiate the review of your proposal. If you have any questions or would like to pick up the submitted materials to aid in your revisions, please call me at (425) 430- 7270. Sincerely, CzZ/1.) rirb Lesley Nishihira 4ssistant Planner cc: ZI Corporation, Property Owners unaminn CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there s more than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: ZI Corporation Sunset Wand Wash PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS 4044 Sunset Boulevard NE 1425 Union Avenue Northeast Renton,Washington CITY: Renton ZIP: 98056 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 042305-9062 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 425-430-9501 Single Family Residence APPLICANT (if other than owner) PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Robert C. Downing Self Serve WandWash COMPANY(if applicable): Architectural Design EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: and Consulting CN ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 5707 Parkview Lane Ppicable): CN Center Neighborhood CITY: Evertt ZIP: 98203 EXISTING ZONING: CN Center Neighborhood TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4 5 3 4 8-5 2 7 7 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): �OPP.,ENT pLnt.,-.��G NAME: Robert C.Downing 24, 886sf uC`CITY OF RENTON C 2 2 199 COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: FEB Architectural Design CE�`JED and Consulting RE G ADDRESS:5707 Parkview Lane IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No CITY: Everett ZIP: 98203 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: No 425-348-5277 LEGAL'DESCRIPTION ,'' PROPERTY (Attach separate st ; if necessary) That portion of the West 259 . 17 feet of the East 289 . 17 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying Northerly of Southeast Renton-Issaquah Road; Except the North 520 . 40 feet thereof; Also except the South 313 feet as measured along the East line thereof. TYPE OF •APPLICATION &'FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will•determine fees _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: — COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ —TENTATIVE PLAT $ --___ ._. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ — PRELIMINARY PLAT $ 7 SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ /000. _ FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION _ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charoe I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ v, — REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) /Ce.s//✓/16/7 , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,Athe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. .. ' ±S i,, r,,,, /� ATTEST: Subscribed and swo to before me; a Nat ry Publie:1 and ,,Z 6itP - 0/6-..5"qt6 /1/s$' J 7 for the State of j/s ', :* esiding ate t (Name of Owner/Re resentative , sr) e , on the rl(xi y,,of + i 5, (Sign of wner/Representative) _ >� ignature •f ota ' ! i /' L' . (This section to be completed by City Staff ) City File Number:(„(l : ' A AAD BSP CAPS CAP U CPA CU A CU-H LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R :''RVMP' A- SA=H SHPL A 'SHPL-H SP'; SM SME TP .V A ..V B V-H W TOTAL FEES $: g c :—t5 (tt 1"1: TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED $ : 1 ::x C MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 Architectural Design And Consulting, Inc. Ar r'1 5707 Parkview Lane Everett,WA. 98203 ' Phone(425)348-5277 Fax(425)348-5277 February 22, 1999 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Wa. 98055 Re: Proposed Construction of Sunset Wand Wash and Detail Shop The following is a project narrative for the Sunset Wand Wash. We are proposing to construct a 3247 square foot wand wash and a 868 square foot detail shop with a second floor office of approximately 367 square feet in size on the property located at 1425 Union Avenue Northeast. The existing use of the site is for a Single Family Residence,the proposed use will be to remove the residence and replace it with the wand wash and detail shop with a second floor office. There is a steep slope to the south and east of the site,we are not going to disturb this slope during construction. No existing structures or residences on the adjacent properties will have their views obstructed by this structure. The structures and/or residences are located to the north, south and east of the proposed site. We are including a list of the property owners with this application. We propose to remove the existing residence and shed on site and construct a 6 bay wand wash and a 2 bay detail shop with second floor office both of which are permitted uses under the CN zoning. The project name is the Sunset Wand Wash. The square footage of the total building footprints will be approximately 4115 square feet. Building height for the wand wash will be a maximum of 22 feet tall, the detail shop with office will be a maximum of 32 feet tall . Parking for the site will be at 9 parking spaces six of which will be vacuum spaces. Total asphalt will be 18,398 square feet. Total lot coverage will be 22,513 square feet or approximately 90%of impervious surface and total landscaping will be 2373 square feet, 984 square feet of which is nondisturbed natural vegetation, on site and 144 square feet offsite. Access to the site will be along the east side of the property at the proposed access, exit from the site will be at the east end of the lot onto Union Avenue Northeast at the proposed street access. Thank you for your time and if you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (425) 348-5277 Respectfully CITY OF€IENTON REC ':4 Sri Robert C. Downing Manager APR 2 2 1999 bU1LLi'ti v I) VISION Architectural Design And Consulting, Inc. IF r1 5707 Parkview Lane Everett,WA. 98203 Phone(425)348-5277 Fax(425)348-5277 February 22, 1999 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Wa. 98055 Re: Proposed construction of Sunset Wand Wash The following is a narrative for the construction mitigation for the Sunset Wand Wash. We are proposing to construct a 3247 square foot self serve carwash and a 868 square foot detail shop with a second floor office of approximately 367 square feet in size,on the property located at 1425 Union Avenue Northeast. We would like to start construction of this project within 2 weeks of permit approval and complete within 90 days after the start of initial construction. This would be a single phase project with the hours of construction being 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. All hauling into and out of the site will be on Union St. to Sunset Boulevard to I-405 or from I-405 to Sunset Boulevard and Union St. We will minimize construction noise and noxious fumes by shutting off equipment when not in use. Traffic impact will be minimized by only hauling before or after rush hour traffic periods if necessary. Flaggers will also be used when necessary. All construction will be onsite only. Thank you for your time and if you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (425) 348-5277 Respectfully CITY OF RENTON REC iVED Robert C. Downing Project Manager APR 2 2 1999 fb lt_Liiav�,-� L)V1S ON CERTIFICATION I, �1 GA 1 hereby certify that -� copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Lipqi? I Kill • Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, an fo e State of Washington residing in—WQ , on the ay / 5i 99 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 G1`SY o + NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: May 11,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SUNSET WAND WASH PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in he CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total approximately 1,225 sq.ft. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 9 parking spaces. Included with the proposal is the demolition of tie existing structures on the site and the placement of approximately 1,156 cubic yards of fill. The project will be req sired to maintain a 25 foot setback from the adjacent Honey Creek. The project requires SEPA environmental revi:w and administrative site plan approval. PROJECT LOCATION: 1425 Union Avenue NE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M) process to give notice that a DNS-IA is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICA("ION DATE: February 22, 1999,Revised application submitted April 22, 1999 NOTICE OF COMI LETE APPLICATION: May 11, 1999 APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design&Consulting OWNER: ZI Corporation;4044 Sunset Boulevard NE; Renton,WA 98056 Permits/Review Requested: SEPA Environmental Review,Administrative Site Plan Approval Other Permits whit i may be required: Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA),Building Permits,Construction Permits Requested Studies Geotechnical Report, Drainage Report Location where apf lication may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: None required. CONSISTENCY O'IERVIEW: Analytical proces: Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g) provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statemen' of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The proposal is consistent with the Center Neighborhood (CN)zoning designation as well as the Center Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. Environmental Do:uments that Evaluate the Prop)sed Project: None known. Development Reg ilations Used For Project I litigation: The project will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code, Public Work's Standards,Uniform Building Code,and Uniform Fire Code. GENMALOT Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square foot of new building construction. 2. Transportation Mitigation Fee-$75 per each new average daily trip attributed to the project. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Ms. Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on May 25, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Lesley Nishihira at(425)430-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION izria'ru-s-<?...iii,;.,; o w r7 ir o • N ' a w� - ..,.o `I' e S x 9 ! Ct •!r'l s414 „C4 hi f •I T f14) V 'W'.. \ L •'"" In ! at s.ns•a � .T4.9 . Iq I I:) i. -.- -� ' I i .�li • a t ._ I , ft 2,6i,i l: , 14:.. X, 671 fa T � ,�R G wi ' F III Iil 7 k ~ a•w .0 • l 0 M .. , 1 ,.._ a PL ' 4-f fit` re 1. �Q Y g(• s rt 2•QR r N 11 N Cr. a s.a� 4114 Z s Lx„: "� N E. _ a .v .try i IS4 1N '$La r Q s.. 4. e? til 222? l a aNE. • I W ir' ,,,.,,.L. ; r:L.;4l•::1. y, ,try �:4 '' e, ,�e ,,,"„ . 1(SY 0 ��Nrc NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: May 11,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-024,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: SUNSET WAND WASH PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Architectural Design & Consulting, is proposing a self-service hand car-wash in the CN zone. The hand wash bays will total 3,247 sq.ft. and the detail shop and office will total approximately 1,235 sq.ft. The project includes 6 vacuum stations and 9 parking spaces. Included with the proposal is the demolition of the existing structures on the site and the placement of approximately 1,156 cubic yards of fill. The project will be required to maintain a 25 foot setback from the adjacent Honey Creek. The project requires SEPA environmental review and administrative site plan approval. PROJECT LOCATION: 1425 Union Avenue NE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: February 22,1999,Revised application submitted April 22, 1999 1 t NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 11,1999 1-` APPLICANT: Robert Downing/Architectural Design&Consulting OWNER: ZI Corporation;4044 Sunset Boulevard NE;Renton,WA 98056 Permits/Review Requested: SEPA Environmental Review,Administrative Site Plan Approval Other Permits which may be required: Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA),Building Permits,Construction Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: None required. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The proposal is consistent with the Center Neighborhood(CN)zoning designation as well as the Center Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None known. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code,Public Work's Standards,Uniform Building Code,and Uniform Fire Code. GENMALOT T Proposed Mitigat on Measures: 1. Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square foot of new building construction. 2. Transports Lion Mitigation Fee-$75 per each new average daily trip attributed to the project. Comments on the ibove application must be submitted in writing to Ms.Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on May 25, 1999. If you have questions about this propose I, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Lesley Nishihira at(425)4 30-7270. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any c ecision on this project. CONTACT PERSC N: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 (PLEASE INCLU[ E THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I Rom' .Im11 I lI .. ' O ,W "ad'urilfl. i c-:. � ON S :PA --_ I _� Y _ .�� H 1": ' e /C s Q ,I � 14) _ `,' .IaJ.. el lial Gj. , sP ue•eo •.' e� Ben (I) ( '' 12) -.. r�"�', '.. ,n C Patten 'YCl A+J I f,t�itir' 1 I „X ,,`�1�*� v'. `13) ram. A� i'''s,,,, (37.1 . '' ea .i u 11 I44.� :•ft lit 2) a - � � N s.os..el _: ate. .' I " S:-to )'J ,.yJ.Eli' I Stanley B De Lona i] m .11(, i 'N,),.H CT ...7-iiS i i eS®4 1. l''''.3.: RiC'13.,-Z fr'' . -`1.,':"--0,.,,,,wwirr E *z a ,,,.7.,,,ctra,-'I, 'pp' '6' 4.„: 44. , la 3 9 o a N.E. . I e 2 0►$2 0� F ,lel7 ,c ., m• fin': ' IV.^_W•gra . i ,b. ��.�1t07Y m ,4) GENMALOT CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENT CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Sunset WandWash 2. Name of applicant: Robert C. Downing 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: CITY OF RFHTON Robert C. Downing REC ;F ED Architectural Design & Consulting 5707 Parkview Lane APR 2 2 1999 Everett,Washington 98203 � N G DIVO 10N (425)348-5277 4. Date checklist prepared: March 12, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Construction to start immediately after permit approval. Project to be completed within 90 days of starting date. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal. If yes,explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Drainage Report,Bank Stabilization Study 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly related to this proposal. None. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building Permit,Public Works Approval. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page(Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description). To construct and operate a self-serve wand carwash and detail shop with office above. The carwash building is to be 3,247 square feet at a maximum height of 23'-0". The detail shop is to be 868 square feet with a 367 square foot office above at maximum height of 32'-0". The site is 24,886 square feet. Currently on site is a single family home and storage shed which will be removed. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 1425 Union Avenue Northeast,Renton 98056 SE '/4, SE '/4,Section 4,Township 23 N,Range 5 E B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. G neral description of the site(circle one): Flat oiling,hilly, steep slopes,mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 2% Slope. c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mucky)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils specify them and note any prime farmland. 0-2 inches of top soil over 30 inches of brown to gray-brown gravelly,sandy loam,over 30 inches of weakly to strongly consolidated light gray, dry till. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The estimated earthwork quantities are 420 cy excavation and 1576 cy fill required- net 1156 cy fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or building)? Approximately 90%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion will be controlled by City of Renton DPW approved measures for that purpose contained in the City of Renton standards and Specifications,and shown on the project plans.There include,but are not limited to: Erosion Fence, Berms, Siltation Ponds, Straw Mulch,Check Dams,Erosion Control Channels,Etc. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction exhaust from equipment and minimum dust. During operation no exhaust or dust to be increased from existing use. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. During construction turn equipment off when not in use. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Honey Creek runs through the adjacent site a minimum of 38'0" from the South corner of the proposed property. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes,the whole project is within 200 feet of Honey Creek. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Storm water runoff. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example.. Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff collected in proposed catch basins on site. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All runoff will be directed to outside catch basins that will collect the water and discharge it to the storm water system. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen, other x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Of the 23,180 square feet of existing vegetation,22,513 square feet is to become impervious surface or structure, 1,389 square feet is to be replaced by new landscape planters and 984 square feet is to remain as is. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Keep existing 984 square feet of vegetation at the back of the site. Add 1,389 square feet of trees and shrubs around the site to enhance look and help act as a sound barrier. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: None. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk,beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric, heat water for carwash and to operate equipment and heating for the detail shop and office. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. None. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. Possible exposure to concentrated cleaning solution (Biodegradable soap). 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measured to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may effect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from site. Noise do to construction equipment on a short term basis. Noise do to the vacuum station at the back of the site during hours of operation. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Automatic turn-off on the equipment.A 5'0" landscape planter at the end of the vacuum stations. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Proposed Site: Single Family Home Adjacent Sites: Veterinarian Clinic& Gas Station w/Carwash b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Single Family Home and small shed. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, all existing structures including an 814 square foot house and a small shed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CN. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CN. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Two employees. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measured to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how may units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One middle income house. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The WandWash building is constructed on CMU with a maximum height of 23'-0" to top of fascia. The Detail Shop and Office is to be constructed of CMU with a maximum height of 32'-0" to top of clock tower. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? On-site area lighting and lighting from carwash and detail shop. Carwash to be open 24 hours,detail shop hours to be determined. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Lights to only be on during necessary hours of operation. All lighting to directed onto site and away from adjacent properties and the street. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Union Avenue Northeast. One 10'0" exit only access and one 25'0"two way access. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, in front of the adjacent site at approximately 30'0" from the property line. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? 9 How many would the project eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. According to the Preliminary meeting,a carwash will generate 108 daily trips per bay. The reviewer assumed that 20% are primary trips equaling a net of 21.6 new trips per day. Since there are six bays in the carwash and two bays in the detail shop the approximate new trips to be generated should be approximately 173. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decisio . Signature: Name printed: C ,vy.4t/6 Date Submitted: 99 L.__ELOPMENT SERVICES • CITY OF RENTON MAY 07 1998 RECEIVED MEMORANDUM DATE: MA- 7+h f/ / TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: Si./NSET WAf'j ) VVPr$Jt-/ LOCATION: /4. '5 t1/viON /1'1'. ?1F A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for //:0O , Thursday, III -j 5t- in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. 771afrfrifet-4-1--- �� ��/mac .�� - GZ�c =L <`��,„ • „oe, F fld- ?ENTCN F!RE DEPT BUREN ►'��.AY 0 71998 MEMORANDUM ECE I VE p DATE: M4V V't "1 e TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: SUNSET WA�Nk) lr^✓I��rl LOCATION: 14 15 i1Ni Ai-tr E A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for //: ) , Thursday, _ v 4-1 ;4 51- in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. eid Will Pt/A a te:Ciej )6F Y ® CITY OF RENTON o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: May 14, 1998 TO: Mark Pywell, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 1 SUBJECT: Sunset Wand Wash, 1425 Union Av. NE Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 2250 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 3. A fire mitigation fee of $1,577. 16 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: May 14, 1998 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Paul Lum ert SUBJECT: Sunset Wand Wash - Preliminary Application 1425 Union Ave. N.E. Note on Preliminary Review Comments Contained In This Report: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based upon the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on programmatic, site planning and other design changes made by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: The site is served by existing mains as follows: 8" located in Union Avenue N.E. (west side) 12" located in City held easement (south/west) of site. The car wash bays will require a drainage system to collect and direct runoff water to an oil/water separator with discharge to the sanitary sewer. If the proposed building has rest room facilities they will need to be connected to the sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees of $0.078 per sq. ft. of site area will be required. May 14, 1998 Page 2 Water: The site is served by an existing 10" water main located on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. The site is located in the 565 pressure zone and has a static pressure in the main at 74 P.S.I. (565 PZ - 393 site elevation = 172. 172 x .43 = 73.96 P.S.I.). There are two existing fire hydrants located within 300' of the proposed building. Additional main/fire hydrants may be required to meet fire flow, Fire Code or Fire Regulations as determined by the Fire Department. New water meters will be required sized to meet current UPC Standards for domestic a�lcn irrigation with IKP rackflow prevention device for the domestic service and a double check valve assembly for the _irrigation service. Water (SDC) fees of $0.113/sq. ft. of the site will be required. f Storm Drainage: The drainage system and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plan shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 IBC ".S.D.M. as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required since more than 5,00 sq. ft. of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is being proposed. The site can be served by an existing 24" storm drain located on the west side of Union Ave. N.E. or by discharging to Honey Creek (south/west) of the site. The project will require an off-site drainage analysis to identify up-stream and down-stream drainage problems. Surface water$bC) fees of $0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious area constructed on the site will be required. �6-2:94,1 c 7 <y 41/14- 374/16Med5 Street Improvements: The site has curbs, gutters, sidewalk, street paving and street lights on the adjacent street (Union Ave N.E.). Any new driveways to serve the site will be required to meet the current City Codes/Standards. Traffic mitigation fees of $75/trip in/out of the site (daily trips) will be required. 9_10 General: Construction permit fees will be required for construction of water mains, side sewer, storm drainage system and street improvements.. The cost of permits are as follows: The first $100,000 is at 5% of the cost of the construction, the second from $100,000 to $200,000 is at 4% of the cost and the third all the amount over $200,000 is at 3% of the cost. h:rnp:preapp98-38 MEMORANDUM p DATE: MA- 7+h I/le TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: S1JN,SET W A-ND Vv7c i�l LOCATION: 14;,5 A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for //:p) , Thursday, 14A--/ -i 5t- in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to M -a✓ at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. Iv? 6eAc✓:14101.7 — `uv ��l,sG ( t)n Pa,e i370 ?u l 'Zvi�s ( s� /;>s we Z0`'Io 2✓/Wtgv� -tV j y (azil s7 Z. I. F euiiy - y s . - -N'�• �,.• ` .. I•`~,LEI Vt 4C..o. I: .,,,..„• . .... \.: :‘,.\ ; :*• .,\ % e, NINmpit 0‘.04 ,slik ar,:.\;,:m ilitnifr -- '\.‘: . , Ar'ftili 's,%,,s‘,:': ' A‘%,-,Ili vp-tili ��- � � �% •low � I<nt r c.r SJ I nd I _ Me r. 11�iiia t' \\v,•,!,•,..;;..,,,,*716,,„„, ._ #40,•;.,44 \ \A 11;11111=11111M1 151111i r It Y..,,,o.., ‘.:,:,;,:.:::.1-_ ,V * ��4�11�� ���/III«II 1�, ..'4.11P :1#1. y • � �• E l�s �.,ee�egillill �, 0 z ;� • \� • ' 111�' tip' I tM®® �M - N •` :\\\\ , \\ \\,wv\\„ \: SE i t6'Pl •_mr •1 •1•1' N �'• r`' • - .. „ • `•`• 'l 1 •`1 /•.ill „ . am IR �`.`41i . r,liis... '.,,rt •NON'•Y:;�••• '�`�1r• \ •• ? \.', ®� I �! i a Or - V '�•s. • .,;` ,•.�;•,i�. ��ik .e \ l��Rrnlmr�f7! �1® . V a -`.gip `\ .' j� Ttr+i, ! r.3.3. ti0i s. 1' ''\..- -: .'%.' ,. , .4.4 3t.-5 a 1 ..ta ll• W ®■ e '\ ®`~.,‘••`,1,,\',,,1i\\ , :'.. ....4,'s..•1!``` (1.:'•• „-..iM1.iM1..1U.. I i[E7mN75FAe*i IMIIIIIIRti mriipi.i.o fit.u m Qm� �,i ,1/4 ':� "0 1 a�S:w✓;•.,' .f- a•,a �yy 1 . so : ,., „,viRim III �. � �_ :,, ,tr .MI ZI IIIMAI Milliemall • IvIIIiii iSl -.n-> ury El - 41. ;' •-rut='u-t , . '"--•-•••••12........_.:...............4/.../ .,.:-. VC1‘.. .,.__. ;1.:'''..**••••.‘.**`'.`*.' •Will NM/Moak .' 1 10 .->::' 7-' .; 1111611111"Pl•*DM. .'*::::•'''..*'iL,-.3- I'''7*•Ii‘',•:*,7•2 . n•2/' '•: • • '. 9 3,_.....„. y A idi • j '.J1.1 I `'`I\W o np e;`Ii' ' 1�.M)�® \� I �ii-It Ar-11. • - • :44 .A=Voi'"'-... : ...... '''' i;11( MMINE 1 IIII'''- .--', ;:s. .:;,-7.: :...,,i liliiL .4.- _"." ..' .."." : .n; Et a : . ...„; ..,1 • -1,0,, •• 1.1.• •: mg' '16. -. : \ ,...... .., -.1:•-- ....wirtiH.L: rtIA • jITI--- \ ;_,.,1110..Nur fasvg ill"' "-' ' i LI Al ''X'' IIIh I I I W'; > 1116, ' - 1 1\u.w ao-t, 1 E5 . 9 T23N R.% E 1/2 �Y o poo .00 D5 ' o` �,°+ UTILITIES DIVISION ----Renton City limits 1t4Tar-, r" P/H/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES ---I.c.,.0 n a w t..t.. 5 �4.NT°� 04/06/98 s 7�r�, °`�.'N►,>n'�°".o.. 4 T23N -R5E E 1/2 • + - - . i.. ►r i ' ht � µ...: : _..it I''' - t_ \\. 81-9 l .4z4, ;'; ; I" r*163SE 96.7 ,8th'. - t,. __� I 1 ,��-_71._-.; i.....SE 99• ' 'S . • 'I t .._. , 1: E �j I I t `�i �t i_. SF 1 Qdth� i 4 -0 z ) «A . �,lox •; Ea.. .I•ca:tki .' , �..✓' t°'i';, .- °° j....tr' ' ..t.._ .S L l.._111 lad l 7 8 ,...io . ' 1, 1' g E 101sti S�t� .. ;ol , .�, ......... t(�i.: \ \ ; off+ , ; i' • •_ .......»..�.-- „p.!•�•-.,,•,_ '.. '` �L y � '• V � 11 Q2r1 °� ;. ......,.‘ , ''—...... i! f t. n ;S i ,• ......tom % t... • 16.4 • N -.•. r - �.° ;. ....` , ,=i 'Jao; t _ !8 _•..._r' ....__._.t 4.'N f �aQ t a • ; '.....�: l� ,to., a t�8 _._ 3 .........;_. ;, ---8'-,,:1 �.: ...NE M.., st.. s' ' ..... 'N : • 16.4 I. `e net no e.._i 1CO :Nil t-_..'' . .31 i "ii swf. �� �...:...:....... ` i....._.., oCi E • : CI_ I' l ,, t.f� ' ' , q7 t ci t.. ...© !p•..:i • if I �"— ..... j .�.:_ ...NE 1 th;, St: %R 1---;-7- i. • ,�iE.. 'h: ..• : i:..t.; • Ce E7e • .�1 i ! L�, e"� o o_._:�,�: � ��St..� .1 �-os•�:�._.__..8 �°�...�� rNE 17t} .•C 73 • • gee. to>s -47 :0) .o ;~•---_r. ,ups 1 � ,... OM „.. , i t .......... • loe� lase // ions �� r`.... ...f 10",.� .......... ......... ' `� tte .�ae `., s� .7-4 f •....1b-..l....I....1227 cl) • "lift. 1 �' EVE'. 14 ,�t ,a7 1,5 e. tar, i,':vep ,....-t' h •�<'.`N. 8" i II \ N. I � 8 „ '........� � A.t PS ES >._� '�' '.. ��.s..._ -•, i I.`....i i)�, r?;•t,...�-I:�"-uu 100E IOOe�0 : ,.... _, _ f . ...i1 i i. •"'",:o -t�..�r , ra�, ,, , , fie :_ ' '-m'_.._•8• NE 12th� t.. ......rye:',, I s , _ " �,; 10 t.. .8 .i i 1 Pou 1 ;o;i; �m oa,ia,e I ... lm ow 1e 8 ou 044 4• .; �� I i 4 N1J 1 11ahi 1: ` ;.CO,.. 6.. ! 1 I /r�.> NE 1... th ION 1 "� � '•tea 644 5309 E 1/2 1 . •0 I UTILITIES DIVISION Q 400 800 ti P/B/PW TecrirriCAI 8)±RVICE3 5304E 1/2 �+ �FNT• 02/25/97� wAT`� 1:4800 d I i I 1 i I 3 I __ 1� Y II -[- I •-� -- \ j �!!! 7 I_s 1 tEF ±il o SE�Sth-Pr___1[..\ I 6) .. 1,,,,x 1 ',... 7 1 ., 0 i 1 w +vy_ 1 -----V-r 1 I 1 " N — ;.... I I I 1 1 163.. ' > 7 / 9t 1. 1- ....._ • - 1�gt . 1,,,,, _ — • /e.... �64 m 60 L— I- n-... ,� %S f 0E -S SE-IOOth St 143 1� —- — I.._ - - `� :BOW�r65 N I I l 4. _ �' • LL - 1FHth - 9 VVV / �. W 141 I I I I I __1 = _ 1_ 1 Jy -� v. SE_101stIStI _.J- 3 1I -1 A I rt___•�- �- T�T r '9 824 ` A l i I9 I1 19• • 1 1 t N 1 , A rl ----A _ i . L I I,. IT�T ...... _J-. 1.-._f.'s'',C -I.--- ...._-.\ — 170 I108 I I 1 q 12cndIS>f I 1185 1 1 1 / 1. `10 822 r 227 11 11 --- -\ 1--- I---`- J` 1- -1T- ----1-• \ N. —.._-_1 \ 601.14E 1s.LS .E-104th_ t I �1731QJ74 1 SE 2 t St I 11 \ 12 N ! 169( 70-e• ;_ 72 0• tE • 175 B•1 in 0• 1:7 --_ 1, ,_ h 32 70 M i S 10 th P1 r— 1 _._... - th t ` 'C N 167 ' —. f _LIH 166 . S , rit P �Tr 1 191 I % r r j - _I '4 __ I 819 I Pierce i SE 106th St I '} �� fi 1 l 97 _.4 ).J' . -_-1 fT ti--_._ ---- \-6kb ---- : 2I4 Zoe 18j �/ •, 819 I V1519 n L d O I -1779.I 1s us / — J • �Bl� w I 113,6 r ! _•_ - . '-i- 1 I 1 'd' > N,17th t -44. l02' 1 j 1 .124_' 41 E-u;tth_Sti• _ - �� I-1 4I -'a d o 119'-8 120 112 0l7 I I — fir" ELN 17_th1St j --�a-� Z w ►b2 ` I - II --I 1 HQfJEY CREEK i).. 1 r J' � � I 1 4 e9 8s7I I= d "> 72 e•LIFT I STATION 1 !1 - i 130 129 ...._l_... _.1.1 I_ i _1._l.;.._. �JJ 1 j -rz a 1 1 II---,--...4..1 1 8 3 _\ t32 ♦ 212 I ss 86 1 ,/ I `—`70 _1___I I 816 l e. 211 6--0-- J _1 -._l. ._ 193y` e. 1�236 209�2!'��2�3�I-1_06 Sz2 5p-`d237E\ �'1i12 1 B' 1 �,- _ 1 e B1 1 ••1 / .Ol '2, m I - '1 101-100 a✓-\ \ /2. I 8.-1--- _v_- 237' um , I 1i I _�1_ �T 4 0• / —I 210 I I`'and( ,-1 . 1.._.... - I-y II 4 _---z 102- f,"\\ NEJ4th-St/ 2• -11 -1--- I -- 1 I 148 , . 1 rni I-�7._.i 1Lds :;: ;- NE_ I I 1 �` -H40 1 .NE4l7 s3- �i� �a+-1 1 I •Ii. 1NE1 11th�1T 1 W 1 • . y. "61 E5 - 9 T23N R5E E 1/2 �� 53u4 9ERVICEB .4, TO 01/04/98 14/v,7-q,�. 4 T23N R5E E 1/2 CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: May 21, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Mark R. Pywell, AICP SUBJECT: Sunset Wand Wash on Union Ave. Pre-App 98-38 We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the proposed development. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. 1. The subject property is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (CN). A written Interpretation/Policy Decision concludes that "Car washes -- full or self service" are permitted in this zone. A site plan permit application is required. It will take approximately 6 to 8 weeks to process the application once it is accepted as complete. Application materials are attached for your review. S&P, 2. Car wash machinery and vacuums can be quite noisy. Although the adjacent property is not zoned residential, some of the surrounding area is used for townhomes and single family development. The applicant should consider the construction of sound walls and landscaping before it is determined to be a nuisance to their neighbors. 3. Landscaping will be required between the building and the street frontage. All unpaved areas need to be landscaped. 4. Elevations of the building will need to be submitted with the application. 5. A report regarding the slope stability should be submitted with the application. An necessary setbacks from the top of slope will need to be identified. 6. Wetlands are known to exist in the Union Ave. area. Although no wetlands are identified on the City of Renton mapping, the applicant should take whatever steps are necessary to assure themselves that no wetlands exist on this site. RE6 7n4 • ' R MAY 7 1998 • ECONOMIC OEVELL:r.._r\;T NEIG;H;DORH000 AND STRA.T EGI(. PLANNING MEMORANDUM �. Qg -3I DATE: MA--1 1, I qci�G TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: ;91)A5 E-T VL ,—NP M /-1 LOCATION: I'fi.01-S /V N E- Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit your written comments to no later than m A-`/ I Mtn- . Thank you. We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant. arts SIT( is Gorlp2_l1-utVSLvc> • 1'c..Aa -rti•ro riH•p. I KLr ONLY APP/kg-z-nrr Po L.i c,'r 15aL (teca'raw)5 1.--02rm OSf--0K'.Ng., 02 Sc-r N lrvc, PcLo NG` We N (Lt 1 t /Prl O Sour I l b►r e. 13o o N o pr!LI.Y , c-O M WI u ru,i 1, D c s►�N POI.►c.( Lu 171 1 L� " 13 G v ri vz,c-Pc r l o"1 /}•NO Sc�2�:Z;7v,Nc. c��- ertRrt L0Ys bt-toOc p 3C erq Li ad\4,,00 -Cv1/4 c-IA A PP(2o P42-I U'��v 05 v 5" c.�gpl N4 Ar iN O aerZv , • P/tzg I-37) TI}C 1'6'0IPI aqI, PrecPr5 A?pay2. -co I=urvc--[iur1 PAfL'C,Nc` oR- HLeoiNG. ive.trk5 • NO (..% PoLcG-t ISSuCr> /1) COT)/OVA iS IDel./.0/.92/}.D/)1 SUNSET WAND CAR WASH CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DECEMBER 21, 1998 REVISED APRIL 19, 1999 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS iti,'...; or ;,,i, ,.0 l'ik 0 0 J„,- , ,,,- J k`YyyN 'iIh a4w's., �e CITY OF RENTON1 ;" l RECV k ? Nom tit r2V2000 i 4-2.9 _7t APR 2 2 1999 BLOWINGDAVS0N Burton F. Reanier, PE, PLS P.O. Box 2187 Everett,WA 98203 - 0187 EXISTING CONDITION AND PROPOSAL: The site consists of approx. 0.62 acres on Union Ave NE,North of Sunset Way, in Renton, WA. It is presently an older single family residence with naturally vegetated and landscaped grounds. There is an existing shed on the West boundary of the site. There is no apparent runoff from the properties up-slope to the North of the site. There is no possibility of runoff from the properties East and South of the site. Honey Creek(a subsidiary of May Creek)runs along a portion of the South boundary of the site. +The drainage basin to be considered is the site area. The native soil is Agc(bordering Agd along the creek)Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes. The main portion of the site slopes generally 3 % from East to West. Hydrologic group is C/D. The proposal is to remove the existing buildings and construct a new wand car wash facility on the site. It has been learned since the original report was prepared that this design is subject to Washington Department of Fisheries(WSDOF)Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA). The analysis has been modified to develop detention storage for the 2Y/24H, 10Y/24H,and 100Y/24H criteria. Please refer to the plan. The Waterworks computer program has been used to estimate the required detention volume using Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph/SCS procedures. In summary, retaining the post-development, 2 year, 14 hour, 10 year,24 hour and 100 year,24 hour storm runoff from the site by releasing the pre-development(calculated)flow results in a routed detention volume of 1837 cf. The post-development stormflow is routed against a V-Weir control,releasing 1/2 of the 2 year pre- development runoff,the lOyear/24hour pre-development runoff,and the 100year/24hour pre-development runoff-at maximum conditions. 1/2 of the 2 year, 24 hour pre-development estimated runoff in the present condition is 0.018 cfs. This occurs at an elevation stage 383.95 ft, with a storage of 1372 cf resulting-75 %of the maximum 100year controlled volume. The drainage calculations assume that the site is presently short grass with a pre-development CN= 84. Post Development assumptions are CN=98 for the impervious developed surface. All of the computations are self-explanatory or have been hand-noted for recognition. The following computation sections follow: Contributing Basin Data and Identification. 100 2y/24h Pre-Development 200 2y/24h Post-Development 300 10y/24h Pre-Development 400 l0y/24h Post-Development 500 100y/24h Pre-Development 600 100y/24h Post-Development Hydrograph Development and Results. Hydro 1 2y/24h Pre-Development Peak Flow is 0.06 cfs F Hydro 2 2y24h Post-Development Peak Flow is 0.17 cfs F------- Hydro 3 10y/24h Pre-Development Peak Flow is 0.13 cfs (- Hydro 4 10y/24h Post-Development Peak Flow 0.27 cfs E- Hydro 5 100y/24h Pre-Development Peak Flow is 0.23 cfs F Hydro 6 100y/24h Post-Development Peak Flow is 0.36 cfs F Hydrograph 7 is the routed result for the 1/2 of 2yr event. Hydrograph 8 is the routed result for the l0yr event. Hydrograph 9 is the routed result for the 100yr event. Graphic Hydrograph Presentation is included in the computer sheets. OUTLET CONTROL. Outlet control will be accomplished by a V-Weir-please see plan. The maximum allowed release is 0.23 cfs (100y/24h pre dev). The general form of the V-Weir equation, developed by University of Michigan experiments: Q=2.5xTan /2xH 2.5 Tan '/2 = 0.002702889 0.23 =2.5xTan c1/2xH 2.5 Cro/2 =0.155° Tan 43/2 =0.23 /2.5x(4.1)2.5 = 0.31° Width of"V" at top= Sin 0.31°x H=0.005410494 x 49.2 =0.266 inches F DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED-PROVIDED. Results: 133%of 1837 cf"routed" storage = 2443cf is Required. A 20'x 30'x 4.1'deep concrete vault providing 2460 cf of live storage will be constructed-please refer to plan. WATER QUALITY. Contaminated runoff occurs after each significant dry period, during which vehicle droppings collect on —. the pavement. Improved water quality can be obtained by "retaining" the runoff from the first 1/2 inch of rainfall after each dry period. This is accomplished by providing a sump that will trap the "first 1/2 inch" volume of rainfall for the project pavement area. A stiliwater sump, 10'x 30'x 2.87'd is provided to provide non-release for the first 1/2 inch of impervious area runoff after dry periods, estimated to be 862 cf for 20,688 sf paved parking and access lanes. The Computer Data pages follow. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS. The detention basin will release flow to the existing Honey Creek channel along the Southwest portion of the site. A rock apron energy dissipation feature will be installed to reduce the flow entry impact to the • stream. By field inspection,the downstream condition will convey the controlled project flow maximum release of 0.23 cfs at "routed" stage-release of 384.96 ft. END OF DRAINAGE ANALYSIS - SEE COMPUTER DATA AND PLAN. 4/19/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 1 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 100 NAME: 2Y PRE DEV SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 57 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 57 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 84 .00 TIME OF CONC • 24 . 35 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 260 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s :0 . 0250 PEAK RATE: 0 . 06 cfs VOL: 0 . 04 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: 200 NAME: 2Y POST DEV SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 57 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 06 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 84 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 24 . 35 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 52 Acres CN • 98 . 00 TcReach - Sheet L: 260 . 00 ns : 0 . 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s :0 .0250 PEAK RATE: 0 . 17 cfs VOL: 0 . 08 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min _. BASIN ID: 300 NAME: 10Y-PRE DEV SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 57 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 93 inches AREA. . : 0 . 57 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 84 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 24 . 35 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 .00 Acres CN • 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 0 . 13 cfs VOL: 0 . 07 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min 4/19/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 2 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 400 NAME: 10Y POST DEV SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 57 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .93 inches AREA. . : 0 . 06 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 84 .00 TIME OF CONC • 24 . 35 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0. 52 Acres CN • 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 0 . 27 cfs VOL: 0 . 12 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: 500 NAME: 100Y PRE DEV SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 57 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 92 inches AREA. . : 0 . 57 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN • 84 .00 TIME OF CONC • 24 . 35 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 .00 Acres CN • 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 0.23 cfs VOL: 0 . 11 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: 600 NAME: 100Y POST DEV SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 57 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 .92 inches AREA. . : 0 . 06 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 84 .00 TIME OF CONC • 24 .35 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 0 . 52 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 0 . 36 cfs VOL: 0 . 17 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 4/19/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 1 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV BASIN RESULT SUMMARY BASIN VOLUME---- -RATE- ----TIME Hydrograph Area ID ---cf-- Ac-ft --cfs- -min- hours Methodology Acres 100 1545 0.04 0.06 490 8.17 SBUH Method 0.57 200 3471 0.08 0.17 480 8.00 SBUH Method 0.57 300 3029 0.07 0.13 490 8.17 SBUH Method 0.57 400 5347 0.12 0.27 480 8.00 SBUH Method 0.57 500 4777 0.11 0.23 480 8.00 SBUH Method 0.57 600 7366 0.17 0.36 480 8.00 SBUH Method 0.57 4/19/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 3 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf-AcFt Acres 1 0 .059 490 1545 cf 0 . 57 2 0 . 174 480 3471 cf 0 . 57 3 0 . 134 490 3029 cf 0 . 57 4 0 . 266 480 5347 cf 0 . 57 5 0 . 225 480 4777 cf 0 . 57 6 0 . 209 540 7067 cf 0. 57 7 0 . 064 600 3185 cf 0 . 57 8 0 . 131 560 5053 cf 0 . 57 9 0 . 135 700 6641 cf 0 . 57 0, IEGEND Hyd No. 1 Hyd No, 2 Hyd No. 3 Hyd No, Hyd No. 5 Hyd No. 6 ,0 Hyd No. 7 U Hyd No, 8 Hyd No. 9 111 {J l %.... . ' ..� 4iu4gq�u0uuu a uuo ni %: ,, .. .,....�.III!tlllnlihnuut 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 Time in Hours Hyd No. : 1 Rate: 0 . 06 cfs Time: 8 . 17 hr Vol : 0 . 04 Ac-ft Int : 10 . 00 min Hyd No. : 2 Rate: 0 . 17 cfs Time: 8 . 00 hr Vol : 0 . 08 Ac-ft Int : 10 . 00 min Hyd No . : 3 Rate : 0 . 13 cfs Time: 8 . 17 hr Vol : 0 . 07 Ac-ft Int : 10 .00 min Hyd No. : 4 Rate: 0 . 27 cfs Time: 8 . 00 hr Vol : 0 . 12 Ac-ft Int : 10 . 00 min Hyd No. : 5 Rate: 0 . 23 cfs Time: 8 . 00 hr Vol : 0 . 11 Ac-ft Int : 10 . 00 min Hyd No. : 6 Rate: 0 . 21 cfs Time: 9 . 00 hr Vol : 0 . 16 -ft Int : 10 . 00 min Hyd No. : 7 Rate: 0 . 06 cfs Time: 10 . 00 hr Vol : 0 . 07 Ac-ft Int : 10 . 00 min Hyd No. : 8 Rate: 0 . 13 cfs Time: 9 . 33 hr Vol : 0 . 12 Ac-ft Int : 10 . 00 min Hyd No. : 9 Rate : 0 . 13 cfs Time: 11 . 67 hr Vol : 0 . 15 Ac-ft Int : 10 . 00 min 4/19/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 4 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST RECTANGULAR VAULT ID No. 001 Description: WCWREN VAULT Length: 30 .00 ft . Width: 20 . 00 ft . 4/19/99 Burton Reanier , P.E. page 5 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV STAGE STORAGE TABLE RECTANGULAR VAULT ID No. 001 Description: WCWREN VAULT Length: 30 . 00 ft . Width: 20 . 00 ft . STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 381.90 0.0000 0.0000 383.50 960.00 0.0220 385.10 1920 0.0441 386.70 2880 0.0661 382.00 60.000 0.0014 383.60 1020 0.0234 385.20 1980 0.0455 386.80 2940 0.0675 382.10 120.00 0.0028 383.70 1080 0.0248 385.30 2040 0.0468 386.90 3000 0.0689 382.20 180.00 0.0041 383.80 1140 0.0262 385.40 2100 0.0482 387.00 3060 0.0702 382.30 240.00 0.0055 383.90 1200 0.0275 385.50 2160 0.0496 387.10 3120 0.0716 382.40 300.00 0.0069 384.00 1260 0.0289 385.60 2220 0.0510 387.20 3180 0.0730 382.50 360.00 0.0083 384.10 1320 0.0303 385.70 2280 0.0523 387.30 3240 0.0744 382.60 420.00 0.0096 384.20 1380 0.0317 385.80 2340 0.0537 387.40 3300 0.0758 382.70 480.00 0.0110 384.30 1440 0.0331 385.90 2400 0.0551 387.50 3360 0.0771 382.80 540.00 0.0124 384.40 1500 0.0344 386.00 2460 0.0565 387.60 3420 0.0785 382.90 600.00 0.0138 384.50 1560 0.0358 386.10 2520 0.0579 387.70 3480 0.0799 383.00 660.00 0.0152 384.60 1620 0.0372 386.20 2580 0.0592 387.80 3540 0.0813 383.10 720.00 0.0165 384.70 1680 0.0386 386.30 2640 0.0606 387.90 3600 0.0826 383.20 780.00 0.0179 384.80 1740 0.0399 386.40 2700 0.0620 388.00 3660 0.0840 383.30 840.00 0.0193 384.90 1800 0.0413 386.50 2760 0.0634 383.40 900.00 0.0207 385.00 1860 0.0427 386.60 2820 0.0647 4/19/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 6 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST V-WEIR ID No. 001 Description: WCWREN V WEIR cd : 2 . 5000 Weir Angle: 0 . 4900 degrees Elev: 381 .90 ft . Weir Increm: 0 . 10 . 4/19/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 7 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE V-WEIR ID No. 001 Description: WCWREN V WEIR cd : 2. 5000 Weir Angle: 0 . 4900 degrees Elev: 381 . 90 ft . Weir Increm: 0 . 10 STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 381.90 0.0000 383.00 0.0136 384.10 0.0767 385.20 0.2115 382.00 0.0000 383.10 0.0169 384.20 0.0858 385.30 0.2279 382.10 0.0002 383.20 0.0206 384.30 0.0954 385.40 0.2450 382.20 0.0005 383.30 0.0248 384.40 0.1056 385.50 0.2629 382.30 0.0011 383.40 0.0295 384.50 0.1165 385.60 0.2815 382.40 0.0019 383.50 0.0346 384.60 0.1281 385.70 0.3009 382.50 0.0030 383.60 0.0403 384.70 0.1402 385.80 0.3211 382.60 0.0044 383.70 0.0465 384.80 0.1531 385.90 0.3421 382.70 0.0061 383.80 0.0532 384.90 0.1666 386.00 0.3639 382.80 0.0082 383.90 0.0605 385.00 0.1809 382.90 0.0107 384.00 0.0683 385.10 0.1958 4/19/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 8 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV REACH SUMMARY LEVEL POOL REACH ID No . 001 In & Out Hydrograph No . : 6 Storage Structure Id. . . : 001 Discharge Structure Id. : 001 Outflow Hydrograph Peak : 0 . 21 cfs Outflow Peak Time 9. 00 hrs Peak Detention Stage . . . : 385. 18 ft Maximum Storage Volune. : 1970 .85 cf 4/20/99 Burton Reanier, P.E. page 1 WCW RENTON 0 . 5-2Y, 10Y, 100Y PRE DEV 2Y, 10Y, 100Y POST DEV LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY HATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 1/2 2YPRE/2Y POST 0.02 0.17 001 001 384.19 7 1371.70 10Y PRE / IOY POST 0.13 0.27 001 001 384.95 8 1831.31 IOOY PRE/100Y POST 0.23 0.18 001 001 384.96 9 1837.40 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS _AND,USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calc ilations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3 AND 4 Elevations, Grading 2 Exis'ing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Exis ing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable4 Floor Plans 3 AND 4 Geotechnical Report 2AND3 • Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Lanc:scaping.Plan, Conceptual4 Leggy ) Description 4 List )f Surrounding Property Owners 4 . Mail ng Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Masser Application Form 4 Mor ument Cards (one per monument) 1 Pad ing, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 • Tra•fic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map 4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: SVt.;,S T W F) `' 2 Public Works Plan Review Section 3 Building Section DATE: •a(. '99 4 Development Planning Section **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 02/22/99 16 :29 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9900748 Amount : 1, 514 . 19 02/22/99 16 :28 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: ZI CORP-1647 Init : CRP Project # : LUA99-024 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 042305-9062 Site Address : 1425 UNION AV NE Total Fees : 1, 514 . 19 This Payment 1, 514 . 19 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 514 . 19 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 14 . 19 7-o24, �n (j) ADaPT Engineering, Inc. 800 Maynard Avenue South, Suite 403 Seattle, Washington 98134 t .►, Tel (206)654-7045 DaPT Fax (206) 654-7048 October 19, 1998 WA98-1488 Architectural Design&Consulting LLC. C 2", 5707 Parkview Lane ,• : '\. Everett, WA 98203 /n / A Attention: Mr. Bob Downing 14ce:".1,,� i, '✓ ^ 2 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation `• ! ` Proposed Sunset Wand Wash 1425 Union Avenue Northeast Seattle,Washington This report summarizes our observations and conclusions, and provides geotechnical recommendations for development of the site. The location of the site is on the Location Map, Appendix A, Figure 1. Our services are provided at your request. Our understanding of the project is based on our discussions with you, our review of the site plan provided and our site reconnaissance, and soils explorations completed as a part of our work scope. The property currently supports an older two-story single-family residence with one detached outbuilding. The house resides on a topographic high on the central portion of the site. The eastern portion of the site is marked by a swale, and the western portion of the site slopes down to the south and west towards Honey Creek. Current plans call for razing the existing structures and building a new car wash facility with asphalt and concrete pavement areas and landscaping. Additionally, the City of Renton Planning and Building Department has requested that a bank stability evaluation be completed on the area near Honey Creek, including recommended setbacks. The purpose of our work is to conduct a geotechnical evaluation of the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for development of the site for the planned carwash development. In addition, areas of the property not planned for development were assessed for potential future development. Specifically our scope includes the following: • Complete a subsurface exploration study of the site • Evaluate the site conditions with regard to slope stability. • Provide building foundation design criteria. • Develop earthwork and erosion control recommendations for the proposed site • Provide geotechnical design criteria for retaining wall or embankment construction. • Provide our recommendations for the management of site stormwater. • Provide recommendations for an appropriate building setback on the west side of the parcel. ADaPT Engineering, Inc. Architectural Design and Consulting LLC. October 19, 1998 • S-WA98-1488 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is located at 1425 Union Avenue Northeast in the Sunset Hill neighborhood of Renton, Washington. The site is bordered to the north by a single-family residence, to the south by a veterinary clinic, to the west by Union Avenue Northeast, and to the west by an undeveloped parcel and Honey Creek. The western and southwestern portions of the site are marked a moderate slope which grades down to the northwesterly flowing Honey Creek. A swale is located on the eastern portion of the site, fronting Union Avenue. The older-two story house is located on a high area on the central portion of the site. Two short (less than 3 feet high) rockery-type structures are located just east and south of the existing house. Areas to the south and west of the house are overgrown with small trees, shrubs and blackberry bushes. According to the occupant, the house is serviced by a septic tank and drain field, which are located just to the west of the house. Honey Creek borders the property to the south. The bank on the north side of the creek appears to grade moderately down to the creek, and exhibited no obvious visual signs of significant recent erosion or undercutting. We did not observe evidence of exceedingly high water levels from past high water events. We did not observe any outfalls or ditches on the property that appeared to be tributary to the creek. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were assessed by excavating test pits utilizing a rubber-tire mounted backhoe. Our subsurface exploration program included advancing six backhoe-excavated test pits to a maximum depth of 10.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). The test pits were advanced on September 8, 1998. The approximate location of the subsurface explorations are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan,Appendix A, Figure 2, and test pit logs are included in Appendix B of this report. Subsurface conditions varied significantly across the site as described below. Test pits TP-2, TP-3, and TP-6 disclosed silt-rich topsoil overlying loose grading to medium dense, gravelly fine sand that extended to depths ranging from 3 feet to 4.5 feet bgs. These deeper soils were underlain by medium dense to very dense, moist, gray, silty, gravelly sand that extended to the full depth explored. These soil were interpreted to be glacially over-consolidated. Test pits TP-4 and TP-5, advanced on the western portion of the site, disclosed thin topsoil over loose grading to medium dense, fine to medium sandy gravel that extended to depths of 6 to 6.5 feet bgs. These soils were underlain by medium dense to very dense, silty, gravelly sand that extended to the full depth explored (10.5 feet bgs). Test pit TP-1, advanced within the swale on the east side of the parcel, disclosed 2 feet of silt-rich topsoil overlying loose, brown silty fine sand that extended to a depth of 5.5 feet. Debris, including metal and wood, was observed to a depth 4 feet bgs on the east side of the excavation. These deposits were interpreted to be reworked soil and fill. These soils were underlain by native fine gray sand with variable gravel and a silt-rich zone at 8.5 to 9.5 feet depth. ADaPT Engineering, Inc. Architectural Design and Consulting LLC. October 19, 1998 S-WA98-1488 Page 3 Apparent ground water seepage was not observed in any of the test pits at the time of exploration, though wet soils were observed in test pit TP-5 at the 10-foot depth. Groundwater conditions can vary seasonally with changes in precipitation, and may fluctuate with changes in site utilization and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on our review of the available data, subsurface explorations and site reconnaissance, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided that the geotechnical recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the design and construction. The site appears generally stable, showing no obvious signs of slope movement or differential settlement, and the underlying undisturbed glacially consolidated soils are in a medium dense to very dense condition and have relatively high strengths. The surficial native soils have a relatively high silt content and are therefore moisture sensitive. Earthwork with these soils should be done during dry weather conditions. We recommend that any structures located in undocumented fill areas have the foundation support extend through the old fill, or that the material be removed and replaced as structural fill. It is our opinion that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on slope stability provided that the normal standards of practice for design and construction, and the recommendations provided in this report, are followed. EARTHWORK Site Preparation Specific construction plans were not provided to us at the time of this writing. We expect that any required grading at the site can be accomplished with conventional earth moving equipment. The site soils are generally silt-rich,and therefore are workable only during dry weather conditions. As the moisture content of the soil increases, the soil will become difficult, if not impossible, to operate on or compact during wet weather conditions. Wet, disturbed site soils would be unsuitable for bearing and would require removal prior to pouring conventional concrete spread footings. This situation would require placing and compacting structural fill to subgrade elevation, or using additional concrete to extend the footings to the depth of the suitable bearing material. Overexcavation of unsuitable, wet soils and replacement with compacted fill can add substantial expense to foundation construction. The operation of heavy equipment at the site can be expected to result in disturbance of the exposed subgrade soils during wet weather conditions. In areas where the native soil is exposed or used as fill, we expect that operation of heavy wheeled equipment will result in significant ground disturbance. During extended periods of dry weather conditions, the moisture content of the soil may become depleted and moisture conditioning of the sand may become necessary. This may require the use of water trucks or other water devices. We therefore recommend that earthwork utilizing the onsite soils be undertaken only during dry weather conditions, if feasible, to minimize grading costs. Earthwork during wet weather will require the use of select import fill soils,with the fines content limited to 5 per cent or less passing the U.S.No. 200 Sieve. ADaPT Engineering, Inc. Architectural Design and Consulting LLC. October 19, 1998 • S-WA98-1488 Page 4 Clearing and Site Preparation All areas to be graded should be cleared of deleterious matter including any remnant fill, foundations, abandoned utility lines and organic matter. If the clearing operations cause excessive disturbance, additional stripping depths may be necessary. Disturbance to a greater depth should be expected if site preparation work is done during periods of wet weather. The organic-laden strippings can be stockpiled on- site and later used for landscaping purposes. If spread out, the organic strippings should be in a layer less than 1-foot in thickness, should not be placed on slopes steeper than 2H to 1V (Horizontal to Vertical) and should be track-rolled to a uniformly compacted condition. Materials which cannot be used for landscaping should be removed from the project site. Subgrade Preparation Prior to placement of any fill material, the exposed subgrade areas should be compacted to a firm and unyielding surface. We recommend that a member of our staff evaluate the exposed subgrade conditions after removal of vegetation and topsoil stripping is completed and prior to placement of structural fill. The exposed subgrade soil should be proofrolled with heavy rubber-tired equipment during dry weather or probed with a Y2-inch diameter steel rod during wet weather. Any soft, loose or otherwise unsuitable areas delineated during proofrolling or probing should be recompacted, if practical, or overexcavated and replaced with structural fill,based on the recommendations of our site representative. Structural FM All fill material used to achieve design grades within the building, foundation and driveway areas should be placed as structural fill. The structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts of appropriate thickness to allow adequate and uniform compaction of each lift. Fill placed in the building and pavement areas should be compacted to at least 90 percent of MDD (maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557) to within 2 feet of subgrade, and 95 percent MDD in the upper 2 feet below pavement areas. The appropriate lift thickness will depend on the fill characteristics and compaction equipment used. We recommend that the appropriate lift thickness be evaluated by our field representative during construction. For planning purposes, we recommend a maximum loose-lift thickness of 12 inches. We recommend that our representative be present during site grading activities to observe the work and perform field density tests. The suitability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines(material passing the U.S.No.200 Sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve. If it is necessary to import structural fill material to the site,we recommend that fill material consist of well- graded sand and gravel with less than 5 per cent passing the No.200 Sieve based on that fraction passing the 3/4-inch sieve. During prolonged dry weather conditions, a somewhat higher (up to 10 to 12 percent) fines content will be acceptable. Material placed for structural fill should be free of debris, organic matter, trash. ADaPT Engineering, Inc. Architectural Design and Consulting LLC. October 19, 1998 S-WA98-1488 Page 5 and cobbles greater than 6 inches in diameter. Particle sizes larger than 3 inches should be excluded from the top 1-foot of fill. The moisture content of the fill material should be adjusted as necessary for proper compaction. As previously stated, we anticipate grading at the site will be minimal, and the amount of imported structural fill should likewise be minimal, assuming that the site is not significantly disturbed during wet weather conditions. Structural areas where loose or soft fill soils are encountered or where remnant foundations are removed will require compacted structural fill (see the `Building Foundations" section of this report). Suitability of On-Site Materials as Fill During dry weather construction, any nonorganic on-site soil may be considered for use as structural fill, provided it meets the criteria described above in the structural fill section and can be compacted as recommended. If the material is over the optimum moisture content (typically 2 to 4 percent) when excavated, it will be necessary to aerate or dry the soil prior to placement as structural fill. The workability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines increases, soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult or impossible to achieve. In general, the soils observed at the site consist of an upper layer of silty fine sand varying to sandy gravel with variable fines content. These near surface materials are suitable for use as structural fill during dry weather conditions. It may be necessary to moisture condition these soils prior to use as structural fill, particularly during dry weather conditions. The deeper deposits of predominantly silt-rich soils should be considered highly moisture sensitive. CUT AND FILL SLOPES Temporary cut slopes (foundation and utility excavations)may be necessary during grading operations. As a general guide, temporary slopes of 1.5H to 1V (Horizontal to Vertical) or flatter may be used for temporary cuts in the upper 3 to 5 feet of loose to medium dense soils. Temporary slopes of 1H to 1V or flatter may be used in the glacially consolidated deposits. These guidelines assume that all surface loads are kept at a minimum distance of at least one half the depth of the cut away from the top of the slope and that significant seepage is not present on the slope face. Flatter cut slopes will be necessary where significant soil moisture or seepage occurs. These recommendations would apply for cut slopes no greater than 12-feet in height. In the event that permanent cut and fill slopes are required, we recommend a maximum 2H to 1V slope. Where 2H to 1V slopes are not feasible,retaining structures should be considered. Fill placed on slopes that are steeper than 5 to 1 should be "keyed" into the undisturbed native soils by cutting a series of horizontal benches. The benches should be 1'/2 times the width of equipment used for grading and a maximum of 3 feet in height. Subsurface drainage may be required in seepage areas. Surface drainage should be directed away from all slope faces. Some minor raveling may occur with time. All slopes should be seeded as soon as practical to facilitate the development of a protective vegetative cover or otherwise protected. ADaPT Engineering, Inc. Architectural Design and Consulting LLC. October 19, 1998 • S-WA98-1488 Page 6 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS The following foundation recommendations are presented for continuous or conventional spread footings bearing in suitable native soils, or for footings supported by structural fill placed above suitably prepared subgrade. For structures which can bear on medium dense or denser native soil, or on structural fill compacted to at least 90 per cent of the appropriate MDD in accordance with ASTM D-1557, we recommend they be supported on shallow spread footings. In general, footings founded on undisturbed medium dense native soil or on properly compacted structural fill can be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for combined dead and long-term live loads, exclusive of the weight of the footing and any overlying backfill. Where footings are founded directly on the undisturbed dense to very dense gravelly sand, bearing pressures may be increased to 3,000 psf for the combined dead and long-term live loads. These values may be increased by one-third for transient loads such as those induced by seismic events or wind loadings. We recommend a minimum width of 18 inches for isolated footings and 16 inches for continuous footings. All exterior footing elements should be embedded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent exterior grade. We recommend that any disturbed soils in the footing excavations be removed, or if practical, recompacted prior to concrete placement. All foundation subgrades should be examined by a representative of our firm to verify adequate bearing surface preparation prior to placing concrete. In areas where the shallow soils are unsuitable, organic rich, soft/loose, or over-optimum in moisture content, we recommend that the unsuitable material be removed and recompacted if practical, or replaced with structural fill as described previously. Where unsuitable soils or old fill material extend to or occur at depth and overexcavation is impractical, we recommend that foundation support be extended through the unsuitable or old fill material. This is typically accomplished with deepened footings and by extending the footing stem wall. Based upon relative density conditions encountered in our borings, we anticipate that a limited volume of compacted structural fill will be required, particularly in structural areas where remnant building footings are removed. We estimate that settlements of footings designed and constructed as recommended will be less than 1 inch, with differential settlements between comparably loaded footings of 1/2 inch or less. Settlements will occur essentially as loads are applied. Disturbance of the foundation subgrade during construction could result in larger settlements than predicted. FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT Slabs-on-grade should be supported on dense native soil or on structural fill prepared as recommended. We recommend that floor slabs at the site be underlain by a 6-inch thickness of uniformly graded gravel or sand containing no more than 3 per cent fines to provide a capillary break. The capillary break material should be placed in one lift and compacted to 90 percent of the MDD. The capillary break material should be connected to a suitable drain outlet to provide an exit for any accumulated seepage. A vapor barrier, such as a polyethylene liner, is also recommended. A thin layer of "clean" sand may be placed over the vapor ADaPT Engineering, Inc. Architectural Design and Consulting LLC. October 19, 1998 • S-WA98-1488 Page 7 barrier and immediately below the slab to protect the polyethylene liner during steel and/or concrete placement. A subgrade modulus of 250 kcf(kips per cubic foot)may be used for design. We estimate that settlement of the floor slabs designed and constructed as recommended, will be 1/2 inch or less over a span of 50 feet. LATERAL RESISTANCE Lateral loads may be resisted by friction on the base of footings and floor slab and as passive pressure on the sides of footings. We recommend a coefficient of friction of 0.65 be used to calculate friction between the concrete and dense native soil or compacted structural fill. Passive pressure may be determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 400 pcf (pounds per cubic foot)above the water table. This assumes that structural fill is placed against the sides of the footings and that the top of the fill is confined by either a concrete floor slab or pavement. A safety factor of 1.5 is conventionally applied to these values. STREAM SETBACK At the request of the City of Renton Planning and Building Department, ADaPT recommends a setback of 25 feet from the existing stream. That is, the base of any wall or embankment constructed near Honey Creek will be at a minimum of 25 feet away from the edge of the stream. This recommended setback distance is based upon the relatively moderate slope adjacent to the stream bank and current observed low velocity and flow levels. RETAINING AND SUBGRADE WALLS (Stem Walls) Retaining and/or subgrade walls can be supported on shallow footings founded on dense native soils or structural fill, if properly prepared. Footings bearing on at least medium stiff/medium dense native soils or structural fill as described above can be designed using an average allowable bearing value of 2,000 psf with a maximum toe pressure of 3,000 psf, when the adjacent downhill slope is 4H to 1V (Horizontal to Vertical), or flatter. Retaining wall footings supported above hard medium dense to very dense gravelly sands may be designed to exert a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf, with a maximum toe pressure of 4,000 psf. We recommend that all footing excavations be evaluated by a member of our staff to determine that suitable bearing soils are present. We recommend that the outer edge of any footing be provided with a minimum horizontal cover equal to twice the footing width, or 10-feet, whichever is greater,when measured at the footing level. Lateral loads on conventional retaining structures founded as described above may be resisted by friction on the base of the wall footings and as passive pressure on the sides of footings. We recommend using an ultimate coefficient of friction of 0.65 to calculate friction between the concrete and dense native soils or on structural fill. For the condition of a horizontal ground surface beyond the wall, passive pressure may be determined using an equivalent fluid density of 400 pcf. This assumes that the footings are cast "neat" against the cut, and that the fill outboard of the wall is placed and compacted as structural fill. A safety factor of 1.5 should be applied to these values,for sliding and overturning. ADaPT Engineering, Inc. Architectural Design and Consulting LLC. October 19, 1998 • S-WA98-1488 Page 8 The lateral active soil pressures acting on reinforced concrete retaining walls depend on the nature, density and configuration of the soil behind the wall. We recommend that walls supporting horizontal backfill be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf for a level back-slope behind the wall. This pressure is based on backfill placed within 2 feet of the wall being compacted by hand-operated equipment to a density of 90 per cent of the MDD and consisting of clean sand or sand and gravel. The recommended pressure does not include the effects of surcharges from surface loads, or the surcharge effects of a slope above the wall. For the conditions of a 2H to 1V slope above the wall, a 50 per cent increase in horizontal pressures would apply. As an alternative to conventional concrete retaining walls, the use of segmented concrete walls with geofabric or geogrid reinforcement may be considered (i.e., "Keystone" - type walls). Such walls have the advantage of economy over cast-in-place walls, and are especially attractive where site grades will be raised, as the grid/fabric can be included progressively in the structural fill as site grades are raised. If such walls are considered, they should be constructed in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations and specifications. We recommend that retaining wall footings founded near fill slopes be a minimum of 2 feet in width and have a minimum 2 feet of embedment. Adequate drainage behind any retaining structure is imperative. We recommend that a drainage system consisting of a minimum 18 inches of washed sand and gravel with less than 3 per cent fines be placed along the back of the wall. In addition, a drainage collector system consisting of 4-inch perforated PVC pipe should be installed behind the wall to provide an outlet for any accumulated water. The drainage material should be capped at the ground surface with 1-foot of relatively impermeable soil or otherwise sealed. SITE DRAINAGE All ground surfaces, pavements and sidewalks at the site should be sloped away from structures. Surface water runoff should be controlled by a system of curbs, berms, drainage swales, and or catch basins, and conveyed to an appropriate discharge point. Roof drains for the residential structure should be tightlined to discharge at an appropriate location,i.e.tightlined to the storm sewer or toe of the slope. The footing drains should not be connected to the roof drain system until sufficient gradient will prevent roof water from entering or surcharging the footing drain. Drains should also be provided behind all retaining or subgrade walls. Driveway/sidewalk surfaces should be sloped such that surface water runoff is directed away from the structure, and where appropriate collected and routed to suitable discharge points. Surface water should not be allowed to discharge over steep slopes. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by the Architectural Design and Consulting, LLC and members of their design team, for use in the design of this project. Our report,conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Variations in subsurface conditions are possible between the explorations and may also occur with time. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided by our firm during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. Architectural Design and Consulting LLC. October 19, 1998 S-WA98-1488 Page 9 for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. When the design is finalized, we recommend that the design and specifications be reviewed by our firm to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. The scope of our services does not include services related to environmental remediation and construction safety precautions. Our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. If there are any changes in the loads, grades,locations,configurations or type of facilities to be constructed,the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report may not be fully applicable. If such changes are made, we should be given the opportunity to review our recommendations and provide written modifications or verifications,as appropriate. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions or need additional information,please contact us at(206)654-7045. Respectfully submitted ADaPT Engineering,Inc. Charles C.Cacek,M.Sc. Senior Project Geologist • o Kurt W Groesch,P.E. ti n m116 Ott, Vice President • st% Enclosures: ._,; .. i o0 Appendix A—Figures Appendix B -Test Pit Logs ADaPT Engineering, Inc. APPENDIX A FIGURES • 1( . \ . •`: ' ? : I' „k.\--- • ''' ' , qii I'li aPark T o► - 1®®_ti • _ __•.ram - • i • 1 lE ;00-_..• 1,••• I•.\ i s.. •.\ _'. „: -- kS•; . 1:::".::t.1 .i.- - :-_-_-17::,01.:, ' :5....70.1"fr," r ravel Pits X :: '�� -+�, . . -:: ~ A 7:: 1 t 1 Plik f--1+ -may, '} � •t!,\.. osb.pdrimeNt,...1 bow • 4k. ito . ''' K:1111 lie ns:-•,,,, A ,' - - -:'_J OM. , aF. ��` \�~4l { \----•Ta ' [�. • , _ 10, 1•10.4•.ik. .04., , .A1 '•.` , ;. • • • ( 1' I • • • 40, /N4*... :t. Ism y... L. i i• . . sH •_r�` .•• a f por_,N.,‘,.,i..:.: _. ,,, N. hi-- \ . -,, I.11‘_,.. .-.... 150. _ i • ter/ .': .!, • ? ...:.1.. ' kid i �Eik� SEL- -4"- -' 1;' ''r.,--7--el.:1 :. Vito, tipy • •• r . :•.raihrtA ILII �A 1 ;1. IR l A lim. iiii Ili Ili 1.._Aii. si 8 _.. . • rit,N -, ',11,. ..01111 FAILIIII ft,* .-\; ;70••• 01 - ._ I 4 i . ! "..• • \II INtifil' Fe4447111 :1111411spni _... 1 1 .. r, .. .: . 4. „A.m. Rid • , ray..4_L ,,, 12,1,.,,, \if. 31 "AI IV i.\ 1 0.-� M :,� ,i ll a -. . n r , 1 L 1 MEE 1 0 1000 2000 3000 4E00 FEET Prmtd from TOPO!01992 Wildflower Production'(www.topo corn) ADaPT Engineering, Inc. FIGURE 1 - Location/Topographic Map 80C, Maynard Avenue S., Suite 403 Location : NEW CARWASH ADDITION Seattle, Washington 98134 1425 Union Avenue Northeast Renton, Washington 98056 Client : Architectural Design & Consulting, LLC. 1 Ph : 206.654.7045 Fax : 206.654.7048 Date : 9/11/98 Job * : S—WA-98-1488 I _ \ \ - 9` \ I I I i �- V I 1 0 Le. ) _ri - \ I [ 1 l o ,� 6 Q x I`� I - 1I N \l 0 ` I 1 _ 17 "— r1 , EXISTING SHED I�9 4 TO BE REMOVED \ V.1:: [ -ro �, I Al BAY I Y FFICE m o f I �� OOsf. w)1j I I I w w 1ifi I N w / 1 :i�� tS�II O O ' \ 1 19' •" 48'-3 ccA a I o 1 I I t I ) z ) � 11 ooOJ �dj 0 / III OJ1 .18 Yi 4 _ cn '1 6 H z 0 1 z 2.. s .‹).• \ 1S' ct NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 2 - Site & Exploration Plan LEGEND: Location : NEW CARWASH ADDITION 1425 Union Avenue Northeast TP-4 TEST PIT NUMBER AND Renton, Washington 98056 t$ APPROXIMATE LOCATION Client : Architectural Design & Consulting, LLC. Date : 9/11/98 Job 4 :S—WA-98-1488 ADaPT Engineering, Inc. APPENDIX B TEST PIT LOGS Test Pit Logs, Sunset Wand Wash Page 1 TEST PIT LOGS Test Pit TP-1 DEPTH DESCRIPTION 0.0 -2.0 Weeds over loose,dry,brown,gravelly,sandy SILT/silty SAND with rootlets(topsoil). 2.0—5.5 Loose, dry, tan/brown with rust mottling, silty fine SAND grading to fine SAND with some silt,fill debris in soils to 4 feet depth on east side of pit. 5.5—8.5 Medium dense,moist,brown with gray, fine SAND with some silt. 8.5—9.5 Stiff,damp/moist,brown with mottling,fine sandy SILT. 9.5— 10.5 grades to dense,damp/moist,gray,gravelly,fine to medium SAND, some silt. No seepage,moderate caving above 6 feet depth,minor caving below 6 feet depth. Test Pit TP-2 DEPTH DESCRIPTION 0.0- 1.7 Surface weeds over loose,dry,brown fine sandy SILT,some gravel(topsoil). 1.7—3.0 Medium dense to dense, moist, tan/gray, silty, gravelly, fine to medium SAND (weathered glacial till). 3.0— 10.5 Very dense,moist,gray,silty,gravelly,fine to medium SAND(glacial till). No seepage,no caving. Test Pit TP-3 DEPTH DESCRIPTION 0.0- 1.3 Surface weeds over loose,dry,brown,silty fine SAND,some gravel(topsoil) 1.3—3.0 Medium dense,moist,tan/gray,silty,fine SAND,some gravel(weathered glacial till). 3.0—9.0 Very dense,moist,gray,silty,gravelly,fine to coarse SAND(glacial till). No seepage,no caving. Test Pit TP-4 DEPTH DESCRIPTION 0.0—0.3 Weeds over loose,tan,dry,tan,silty fine SAND with rootlets(topsoil). 0.3-6.5 Loose,dry,tan/brown, fine to medium sandy GRAVEL with some silt and cobbles to 8-inch diameter. 6.5— 10.5 Grades to medium dense, moist (damp/wet at 10 feet), tan, silty, fine SAND varying to fine SAND with some silt,with silt-rich inclusions and clean sand zones,some gravel. No seepage,significant caving above 6.5 feet depth;minor caving below 6.5 feet depth. Test Pit Logs, Sunset Wand Wash Page 2 Test Pit TP-5 DEPTH DESCRIPTION 0.0- 0.3 Weeds over soft,fine sandy SILT(topsoil). 0.3 -6.0 Loose to medium dense,dry,silty,sandy GRAVEL locally varying to gravelly fine SAND. 6.0— 10.5 Medium dense to very dense, moist/damp (wet at 10 feet), gray, gravelly, silty, fine SAND (glacial till). No seepage,significant caving above 6.0 feet depth;no caving below 6.0 feet depth. Test Pit TP-6 DEPTH DESCRIPTION 0.0- 2.0 surface weeds over loose tan silty fine SAND with roots(topsoil). 2.0—4.5 Medium dense,moist,tan,silty,gravelly,fine SAND(weathered glacial till). 4.5—7.5 Dense to very dense,moist,gray,silty,gravelly,silty,fine to medium SAND(glacial till). No seepage,significant caving above 4.5 feet depth;no caving below 4.5 feet depth.