The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA98-052 --,-If_-_--_ j,,,pm AtiN 7-- I -zI Ic_ A L___LL__I \ , 7 _ . r IL(P) i4144 R-1° 1 44 4:12 co 1.11 : - ti_-- .- \, ,. 1•4"i''. -16 ---p-- t ---S - 1.--•-_, R- ,[. ...._ , . 15 t S132f.----_R----1,6• N9W--euza:n1.11:_ .-R-1,110. J P-1 Airport Way , r .,id (k ( \\ \ & -c° li- ri a 0 ! I— ,9- k1) CMOS 7 -de ,,,1.91 - A 111111111"1;cAt. milletutim3115111IV - ---,,_=__ r___,....... k • 11-; .1,..„,, •ett‘'° I.kr ."' ,r—=____\_\_6 ECM= 17",01 1 ,,,...--„....._ 'f'• - ci) WM_ 11E1 o'l Ag --\-444ititt:6 6 SITE OF PROPOSED — c-'ob N lili /Or 2/24 . CD(P) DEVELOPMENT la •-- RM- S CA. RETAIL lit ma t'il rm ••• ''''(•• Ot morross , - NEW SAFEWAY iir.631,„ ,.... , CITY LISSTS--Ini \j_._ • - Ct1 .17--. St illti;'1.- --T . .. r= 1- ,L1P 1/4L..........zi j --6- 7441181141/ S 2nd St. CD „LI w44 A'''''\ , S gfirdi K, 401-- CD' - I 1- _ , . R-10 - ,' / 17 C-A LiFr - •-'91: ---Ci' CDg CD- Dr---- -_. R. 3rd&re. — — .. _ CD ''' CD CD --- -- its. 4., ___ 1... _.„.___ 1 - , _..z• .-_/2.J 23 '3rd Pi.I cp-m112M11-1"1111—cp--' '- pi 1-5.,- s4'65' de, , , . . ' CD-- __. LD co CD cD , D CD - CDIF c' Irn. - -•-1 - 6 > -• ..- ----cer ig ce :M—1 e;c‘s te- 9) • ___., --- •__„,,-. ---": T _ = m '' 2-14 El = ---_. ' - - - -------• ' ---- 1-›- Ex tr_ - _ ce - ,!-: -- ct-to -"--- -__• __ _---------.- ,71'4 M -- -S ---61h- St _,' -•,• I ------ • ----I - -••••1 Pei-li j- 7-7 3 ' 5 6'...1/ .' --- 1M %/ '--- CA __•1 - i-. :--- . i . py ... CO-x_ 1 CA tx m s 7 .1 i le- . -- - ...• IMP II II CAY7 6! •••••. .....AN PISWISCIWO4 FLAN NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN I A0.1 1 ---- -- — - S. 2ND ST. `\` r ---- 27. PARCEL x __ ?�O _ 1 p SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPELINEw ��\\I : \��T---__ i 1 N m]y'u•a .zzer J m,r o.v N..5•b.w 1a1 I 50• r 1.--: J= TO N K I N A PM«,,. .6.1..) __,,``\`\ I1.... `................./ a.,r W S W $ P.4cE e O PARCEL DATA ``, ' L R: ACCORD B z°oa.a t i 9' W SITE DATA T�.°K. O gw mme v,,xs .xa W Z mf. R GRAPHIC SCALE SOWN. b.s 225 le Y a , 16 PM1p01a11P , I ..,»tr ? I E Li (Ws.m)R y. Is..no,aa°n °r an,r CMS a xP > _ rt CARNEY r= Q ° .aSortleSyAE „2.ms +•m' N b• WEND CO NW CI c Y sAFeHaY ,b,388 SF nPPLNc CO.e.q.y. ' J SAFEWAY my,,� I} PARCEL c-, 'I P.Po9 WA C 2 PMCQ rt• F° N 5219.4. W >, o.ea«. PARCEL c nz A TWO G x y.b' ,642 ..a..Jr 0.36°c. n10 d PMC6 F• PARCEL G No n>a an 1)15r) ft 201 a. N)r)y�• n le =» faxes' ° Er �4, . ,u KS-730.. S PARTENRSHIPDPPARCEL 0-1 5,qo wt. oao 11111118261 , xM S 4;' i. e W- KS PARTENRSHIP y �� k FIRST INTERSTATE A IA[SUSS 3'702 a I D 2 pARm q-x '`.P`' .d'ii •Va• N+ F $ N ee......w I ,l.gya a-0. q.])x / p�1V PARCEL 0, 0 1...1 E' (,g,'p f. n1*d nQ':.' PARCEL E I_ •;a. as °am.".. CUSTOM •VIKjIG • " `,base n c lBi7 $2QT a f..nua sax. ''.off _ >».\\..w �. agar • MCAT rt A WWI" nn n -- \ - - - - - - - - S. 3RD_ST. R :^n�o a°.n� --5-- e IMill Horton Dennis a Associates, Inc. SAFEWAY "'siea,;o Con.ulHnq Engin..n,Pl.nn.n,ontl Su+..yon SAFEWAY CORPORATION '° RENTON CBD MASTER PLAN 'U aIIRUN,M9PROTOl .))-i5i5 '^'^� I s_J_ •�-- —'"'°' 1CV 11O" A. �� '� NOTE- BOLDING OUTLJNEs TRPctP FOR HDA ',UR.ti 4/Z5/95 ..---..., 1 I , 1 Li P1 -') F I I -0 ' i , Til tlirtrAr -.MIMI U Nob- . I I . i = ER1 11R] r.A _ ')W 1. _ , 1_, 4 4-0 1 t 0 0 gi.J.. . J._ -- . I P I , 1 , I •..^:.-i. --rril.r, i 2F i ll Ell 111111111A11111Fl 4 i .---1- 4 i L l--I IIIIIII1WWIIII I-1 in ........T. 'ift , Lo o o iii cr-- ; 1 134 • 11 1 1-11-1-1 1 0-1-t1-111111-1-tti I --=-7—,-1 i-c 1 F++++-rlir „ g : •,mi.-..,. 1 Li 11111 1111li111111111114L1 1 li ti - ---1--1--1--4--F---1-, 1 ........1.. 11 4 i I—1 • I--If-,+-IF-1-4--1--1 -: 1 1 ! ELtiC7,[1 ril I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ - -j-1--+;-1-i1 i—i--I—I I. 1 ElICM-' 1 1,==.Tn—',„7. ^•' i— °=I. LI_L_! —C 1 I111 10111 11111 11111E1 ...,,,..1., iit=I, 0 I 9:1429c1 .- If P 4 I u• -Ail g -- -- -- t-EPIY i----I it-1- 111 illI1 I I 11 ti1141-1- I 7-m= t ' 1, lEirriti -----T rEr 1 El III ! OIL! II il Mal 1 I _, 1 u il [ia 1 E-Illt l--I lii ! hill ] II I I I I I I--1 — t li Z T..i F . 1 LS I Elca 4 1 t‘ .7. - - rill Ill iill II I I I I -I r-] , Air, r=i r o ii.14111 1 4 1 : jElca --- IEI IIIIIIIWIHIIIIIlLI I I Irl- - -; : OM.41111.10 '.7T' -64ZIV .... i 11 1 _, ii I-- 1 . LI I I I I I I ill I Ill I 11,....11 ).-- liT ,4.1...4; t r., I a 1 1-1 111111h1W111] ----1- 4 1 ; I I -i•— , 1 4 =.. [ Lk.14J 1 1 ='-''1 , --- El 11111111111111] ; L.,,E__. IL ,.. n 1 1-j 'I i -El 11 } 1111W1111.1- ti n ci I1 : , 4 mow*who li II III -., ; i 1°00,of.0°000 1 .•I ll 0.' . . i' 11 !If,' ir 1 _, - ,. iv,di o II,i. us w o .i 1.,i'• _ —,-- D i• •- un1 1 .7 4 , 1 . 4 I • u 1 .1_11111111__1 pi S1 I 1 IV 1, hp Ji gl, * . :I cm 8 LE Ini p I IJIII ,i i. ii A*\ ' . ...' 14 ,'' , --,.•= ' "--, " -HI '' ' ' 1-11 , 11i71liiiiiii177 Ii ..,--), _al . 3:1=.,„ — r 1 1 , , 1 1 1 41 III 1 g i tij 21Z-- IPW/ZI .' r. STORE 4*Isee i 7 > rd Ai igf i A dif RIENIVN,INAISHIN,STON ii�� 1t�� a �i NOTES V i `"`_ A _ �> '.tea eie _. Jade*, R.�.absent. U.. less gags ` e'""" '"Moll. "a" ,�."�"�;, . ten cw Aryl wt. � S �, a9uuD�+Y. 4.4'depth topsoil g d all tens planting crease �ipecsE A.ry.l Mwveb. I �•depth 9'aGe Uak mulch In o p�beds ,4u b.woe*News of peel Y trlv�� i All ebb mot�bi Pal Amens l...IN.lasrt IVy,full cwawm to USA E �� tall ` g�b�e.n wml¢irvo-n ...trort.emotor.oy or else oedltY w0" ..or 2 1 be _ - ` '' aor Nib not pralWb WRr Owner.o-� T boob ales Y m� n L Lrl.n j pI�K jab art bee>bg'b pacrg. tepwn nenAe so �Vx �.' :$*x- "w`�e�"�. b.N mass o n w.v«4e to haute o-a.eq.. 3 0 . a• - y.lu a rarrgo." rg .1.mn o o-orege shoe be fr.. . plmtng:.w p i e� a' t�su" .let ogyi..r'° o yb.w. Use,mti 4s from curb re..,a=A..nag e$ b}} ws.nee,top,notes. TACO TIME EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL II.cw•w:q sent massing step bib,'win le adjacent to .o Scab DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL a. .w,70= ,,,ell rbl IN Seas .e.r wea.r.m. O z1 • V \ \ IT nx 1r° I w, .11 ti 'iCRWND COVER SPAONC DETAL AM/PLANTING BED DETAIL SHRUB PLANING DETAIL Q WEND YS II �1 1 � Z l l PLANT LIST a ,, . , < n/ ^ I I Fl/e7u5 CC/.wrd>I'AST'/ Aewporr Fbaw.ii2J Pklry 1'84'aggfer oan.0,(3 In IL —- - - - -- _-- - - - - r✓✓ P'f C lz.Ynr,"Div fbri' / >zz-rfY// G / /i��•-r 3•'g y � Fkr..,Nten%AL un Rfb U'',474-w ur/xi�'JY ot.3 �� 0 ✓Gr;42en/S alg-or.'/S 'PHfzCre77 Ga rw' 'ca440.441-ProzervU7/P44'6.444.454/ - o PrznuS'L. 'OT Luf/4sO' / OM,Lu,.ken%iu•L/ 2 5w//4n, itv'avez Jul/pono6 H. 'ss/xG ',Lows'//7S ea`-6 4*S 'Zr•,/ ie a9.04er7 vrOoG. 3 _ />rcfart4PVI s L/vq- .-rs/ / (�va7�rrx�t. 4'p:71 20'oG, QS�:Lr;rees-Oeysii G,.Ei/7,y 4,erefi1- 2'4//j6r/ P'G l'1 8 A 0 Gr.4,7%X. r5 GwwScrurz. .aulYls-,5'/ ther--- .2rr Grfa'd v"/7i n.G.-C VA w 1-, Will T z W E I F xzcz \t! 4. \ u a ` . E.a R z : R .. - 11 (_ Ri ® Sheet IL�AIN IDSSC CAPE PLAN tI 5 30 0 L-2 0 • i 9 eec.6T ZI: A/oryl -�S. 2ND ST. oo oazr punt mrfi/wi ��.p �, �i- �Inlunnlll a.vwr"°" 6 i ') I1 �w) >1a4?nn � s 1 y� _ _ Nate 9 LI'.N(G/!AP =MGM �. A '.4'/, ��Bs�,g' G'1 GLV// r/L7J a,` _ I•JI 'j., t 's ! /1X( !WJv� D9L't//ALGA, ,-4// ..l p7 yYM)T//e q/Y.ri. . '11 ' a O EXKYlee rile* ( '_I - 1 sr gl ,.frrOir4 %v 6 `a p ws7it plum *.aaa„ 21 CG>'/iiii�i o fe>% N MI ' i 1 ,-2,,,,, I1l _ I `'0 ,5..., . • $ SAFEWAY•1563(M-55) i Ira I„I IY� # o ;til S1 �'� Lit �ax 1 •' 11;' C. a :\ Ai9 idiirn W w -A a lsc z/ w a \ awn Ig ° 8 1 m.nn cr L/ � ( 1 F. o : I.:I •�� tree v�� • z z 'lD .><.y� i ma's ,y,.°'' ,,*1 �.. � _ .00 `d4 a..,J_G� O'.'.; t '1•�a�'oa ;[Alli d l ii ^-} -- � { y _.. y III IiIrI IIIIII<� ' .. 1 }_ $3 ./ � � 1� 1 S. 3RDT , �- (//j■��1 sn..1 �x27ir2y(.v'#n�mz- V/ LANDSCAPE PLAN Ord,//'� ` flEL____I L-1 0 15 30 60 n� FOOD&DRUG T] [ _• _ w�T■r air ■in NE■■■ � TT TT T T TT �mC '� AMU � CI \_EBa"M.-- II ni• - -1.... M0. 1.....=.. ..- Tss,„_ ....,,,,,,,. 11.1-1 'i a.*&MY WAS YAM---)1 2 IX i mow dor OREST ELEVATION 15''-0 itz ® ------- — - - -- - i R� �■ �— Oscum ELEVATION .r.� w•r.o K� ( ..u.e....m rum serr d 1 -- - -- - Vrf 8- -- - -- — O EMT ELEVATION or•.o • L-1 / if/ ONptTLI E.NATIQI w•io I iy(�,I'"""I 11 ,1 tii 3 vvv LJv v.ni WV, , -2' i•o. I I II I I IiIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIti I ELEVATOR - --- — PUN 1 . _ _. - lI SITE ; wE"T I 1, 0 �; I l r !I C� !.MP ERECT i iI I OSECTION AT EMT►NO►ERY LINE w.ro O SECTION AT IWIl4 WV STOTT w•io . A2.0 Immin• i Ailail..2ND ST. 6"....' _.____ 0 5•., aftdftAlft . i 1 . - .. ....--, 1111‘1k-1 II _ • I • ,, ir comp ... ) I FGEND ,..---„ / \ / -__ ( . .-N 1 1, •r 4 DENOTES CALIPER SIZE OF TREE AND REMOVAL `, / TOTAL TREES ON SITE TO BE REMOVED= 53 \ •._...- ,.,---,, —10601111,1•11 ,64,.. ,,,,I.. ii., '7 11 I I CE) DENOTES CALIPER SIZE OF TREE AND PRESERVATION TOTAL TREES ON SITE TO BE RETAINED= 18 Z I - -I I TOTAL PERCENTAGE RETAINED= 25% < I — I -,... •-• IMMO SIM 1[6:66,031 Z i 6......., _ , 0 / , c _ _, , _ 1 r z , • 1Alp IA _ I- C 1 21141M 111 0 \ — / I 204 r A n:Al a _i •- _c -,t o 1 1 ...• ., 20. 1 3,610616.i > 0 I f 1 ir 0 )-i X .< ,, 111 ri 1 c _ • 1 tu_2 ILI ii_ c _ tu ,,„4, 0 ci - it ., 1 LT.' rj.•gl.I4,,,\ . Is , , 1 11 ,. ort, f: •r OEC‘p, ..4. , :::\ ...v,.::1,,,.../.....4...<>1.,. -- )f 30\, 0 1 N..... t • IS liCO. / --,..., 1 sArEwAy*1563 04-55) \ ' ‘--11"' ° •VA 1-1B• . •al.... T" • N. ---- 1 1 . ..._.., 1,7 i I - . _ ..., , i I I I ..., _ I ,, :."--- ._. . I I * I 1 gq ii i i_ _ _ _._ - ..-----_,_-.... 1 _ 1 w i4 4 I g w ., A. 7I 5 • 'tir"."' 11 /2 1 1 41111 < p z 2 S. 3RD ST. EXISTING TREE REMOVAL / RETENTION PLAN Sheet 0 15 30 60 • • . . • .''23N., RGEq'SE..*M. .' ., qa qu r B o B. • e .a. 2ND ST. • ++ .' q M° - �4 IVT R" w• T _- 6 T £` u• T I s d .-0 q q qd •p' -, 4, 4I, 4,• 'I' qa d maidlliME Ba>re •a...91llv181Mlf•nI,tt . _ '� �^'�.w�©--�—.tea " • kl\s'•Ire I�'/ .�••.) •q. •...T [� , ,. ''S dl .. pi . NM .7 ff l - .•. qI � tix m EstCwTAmIve ' \ d ii ,d•aAg I Tie r�„.w � ; , ,1 i .�.i N3 % . _ - w".!> Odq" 1 °' a .rbr .. vwM1 / / ,^ In w m•a I /teYMCAO' • Ia✓`.ra /it 30 ,.ss a«a' IviN ,C 4s 1 D DE1EN1101/ • WATER QUALITY VAULT Y,I•q . ` t,N• II 43 VI• • 4 .` LA '' ,�$ \ / ffias •o Q y I iJi 1 s \C . ,',.' / � , aa 1. j ••.. l . : . s .'" ... 1:":cieT4 T.W�,. • Vij: `irlie 41+v= 4'' k ..'�,., ,:sx a°-f .32 116. .;•• ...2;' '',1.4 Sz'' ..4:1::'1.: 77- "" '''' 4's.!+ ."-• / I III 1. ,u• •,. �'.'s.,,. ... ... �.W ... T ..'. -ev-`+"i! c '.' ,iyl.,"T ,,. s a" w ]t6� a•• q°w ''. .ad' as -._ _�. _I i /� �i . ,• s �� In q° W • t'A a qa 8� � —— ao- . ... q°• .530. 'w ROOf IXiAWS ,+• (n ''i • F x_a,0 ,.as ix 79.OI� �� • I. .as ., "wr+"`' —J f- } — E'— ——<� a• NEW BLDG RUNOFF GRAPHIC SCALE �g1 ... � - is q Y UNDETAINED AND 4 3� ...• • a ..._.,. a �,i'. oill " UNTREATED S , •ems - ®"". -..—� ..w r �� '`•.. i +.. ._ I.. ,I ( le I 1.1...311"�11L ,-Y swar'—� F:... I F.F.= 33.00 LL.I �nc.c N __��_ " ,� ° "/ °(I q "#"'a tsu s 4aG71� , Z .2P• °fo �`o�ik 0 roes 9. .. ..a ma �ye••�¢'6'� 'S o „t9 '''o i e-.,,,, _ [ I• ,qa J }�' '�� xv W Y 0 ,, nw4 A„ +` M III B .c °� • a,+ = I�� ; SEAL a • .o qa ,� ,' ".al / dF ' 1 •T NC I w..o. wm•rn Q .,ems` Z.2i-'IS ,off' _ qa la/ vafYl ,.M I • Iee I;, �..., n,o,.99 I 96298.D� =A .� .,. .,l'•_1 \ �,1.- , I ,-.,t 1 �.N_ ■ ^_ . d'!pL ..• s.w' a BUSH. ROED t HRCHINCS. INC. • q ` ��.r_ '7" \uS1. l\__ `1v • pNL ENgNEDtS LND SLRKYORS EO 1 . O a.w a' J .i? , 124 ��• J3L� ,�. wr ( ww ^O30 o' �. a a .i'.'. �� .4/ I Effif. r; •a. I� B ..�,�m"'-5, .J.w.4o '.'mw Lin,:a n Ng \ d _s4 ... M q CITY OF RENTON q , o -" - - �B •'��` '�].C' .•I .1 -' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS O, 8 "��a t • , , , � �, '" I SCHEMATIC GRADING & UTILITIES • oLi,rr OS' „1 o a. - a_ S.1ADy ` SAFEWAY STORE NO. 1563 J u U:\99298\XSOI.Dwc S.E. 1/4 SEC. 18, TWP. 23N., RGE 5E., W.M. 1q q J O k q0 4' N �� s„ H BA II TOL.L b kJ I ENSMO 9RME O 'a . ,9' J'a �• ` •vr� an l w q PUIP TO CCM ' L-1 '° 9 o 3, EX1S7. .C. . lg a REB s d. .7,. ., ..,,,,,,, ,.. GRAPHIC SCALE 1.,,,i ,.. ,..,. . 4, ,,, ._ . N j .� Y w v qd� ,.S ) N Z p J °'\ 'AlopPCR t o = �� ;i, a < y�C.,, � a' SEAL OS N °i J +`F 'F'P ss'rl'.'` U 2-25 , l.,.°' ar $ < I— •- 7 I _ 96298.01 ` q o « 'Rv'�' y oEa vu ° _ BUSH. ROED & HRCHINGS, INC. _ !n CIVI MOWERS I WO SIIRYETORS �S "`. 1 r f�o"AasmDawE 1 aMal E-.V.1rdl p10. ,°�"' rf.fa CITY OF RENTON n . `/—Ts_- -- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS g ' ''•.Rw U's z, * SCHEMATIC GRADING &UTILITIES S. 3RD ST. SAFEWAY STORE NO. 1563 ,4 BECT TO- o. RNf D°a �2-17-98 , ..a. ^ Cd MST.WATER PAD a8 e_.. _ P°J 9J oig— PKaED. rrK 1-.XI' ad •.. s$ n. R .. AMR D.,n VDT 2 > 2 C:\96298\KSOIDRG NIml m lfl # t wi I 0 - S. 2ND ST. R.N • .. I N 't ' USE PE' ....L___AREA� - . . __ _,,,„___,:... 7- _ � -_` PROJECT INFORMATION ExusnNc ,-mac ',J '' - -\- \ PROJECT: Xe.wl w.V MO eu rAco nuE ' - _ — \ EIllli VOW MFLIM 9,045 DC 1.0 OM MOP /. �I YLT�RST µPART M r.. Fr M..'''' OQ sRNc ` E%ISTINS LOT USE ,. ... _ 1 F_ 7,1 % IA .: I r PROPOSED USES xewnsnnerx a p; a ` 8 r: ,�' 1 , zli. q 41 0 j N ZONIS& ca:e¢iu Nevuu-CA pN W , EXISn i .. / L - _._. .„ IMFNT�� aum sr I z I - / w -p j SITE AREA: - A I: a �— �"'i' 1 I �I _ .- __�__ ._� —_____—__—. r- I BUILDING AREA sveu. usurer i AL, 1 ' ••.J � �• I I :/ `,. maws«. '` +' I ..N. LOT COVERASE: .mr. use°. sFill ..I ' _k Ii 4-x 1��^1'^" ` PARKINS REQUIRED % „AFEWAY XI563(M-551 i i n�. ,.. yyy I i ::--- �_-I PARKINS PROVIDED 'I1.NOT A KART } �-j _ __ IN �(`' /� \ �jl -`' � _ _l.� TYPICAL STALL DINEN601.6: w Bn j,- 1_ -/� I I PARKINS LANDSCAPE: ..„--/ _ y � � -. x I GENE'S RESid2ANlE j ,1 ° - � /'a /�I '� I IIIIII - + NOT A PART &11LDIN6 HEISNT ,.w�.rw. ,eaoo EPEE OM MM. / /'' q 1 j - .onrm sa w .an /'' / I IS111411..... wm "�' as sa I.:..I.erlwu / l/�� I `�� I h.. �/ w..w BUILDINS SETBACKS: oC¢l MaW x� -1- /IX�III � ) _ k t S3RD ST ` \ . • Nem > SITE PLAN POIl MM.,OM,.HEM MO OLONGS c"en[ SITS PLAN ewo,.e,.e°mer APPLICATION env PLAN r•SOW .. WM • . A0.0 ty � CITY IF RENTON ,00 NIL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Sz f po., March 20, 2002 0,,. 3 /22(OZ • James D. Garrett MBI Construction Services 3114 South Proctor St. Tacoma, WA 98409 Subject: Modification of the Approved Site Plan for the Safeway Redevelopment Project File Nos. LUA-98-052, SA-H, ECF LUA-00-059, ECF Dear Mr. Garrett: This letter is to inform you that we`have reviewed your proposed revisions to-the approved site plan for the Safeway Redevelopment Project. This modification will supercede a modification approved March `14, 2000 (see attached). The proposed revisions have been approved as a minor modification to the approved site plan and the previous modification. The Hearing Examiner initially approved the site plan on July 16, 1998. The approved site plan included the existing 57,016 s.f. Safeway store and 352 associated parking stalls. On March 14, 2000 a modification to this site plan was approved allowing for a gas station to occupy approximately 12,720 s.f. of the Safeway site. This modification eliminated 36 parking stalls, however, the remaining 324 parking stalls satisfied minimum parking requirements. • The modification being proposed at this time would alter the site plan in order to install a temporary kiosk for the purposes of repairing the existing kiosk. Specifically,- the proposal would involve the following alterations to the approved site plan: • Installing a 12-foot by 16-foot temporary kiosk with associated 3-foot by 30-foot ramp directly west of the existing kiosk • The temporary kiosk would not be placed within any required parking stalls, circulation areas or landscape buffers. The Site Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as changes which do not involve more than a 10% increase in area or scale of the development, do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment -and 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 rs,.... ...........•......anw.nr....iew.....•...:..i nnot.... •�....e....,-. i Safeway Redevelopment Project Minor Modification Page 2 of 2 facilities, and do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC § 4-9- 200.H). ; The proposal to install a temporary 192 s.f. kiosk on a 262,000 s.f. as the existing kiosk is being repaired would be an incremental change to the site plan. Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the Safeway Redevelopment Project. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of the environmental review are still applicable to the development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental (SEPA) Review and/or Administrative Site Plan approval may be required for future modifications to the site plan. This decision to approve the proposedi revisionsas.a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period frorq the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision mustbefiled with tie City of Renton, Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, April 3, 2002. If you .„haVei,questions'rtgardind this correspondence, feel free to contact Ashley DeForest t,(425) 430-7289. . , Sincerely, '" "` . ` w,1* "f'- 4� �, ia. �f _=:.',::::-4.:•A'sfik;,,,?: t 4„ ).' V ' % rttl i3 Jennifer Henning, Zoning'Administrator •�' > Development Services Divisio 4 y.`'.�` f cc: Land Use Files ,.. ': Parties of Record • } arh.ft 5 .} CIT'. 7F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department / / Jesse Tanner.Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 14,2000 Mr.Stanley Paulus SSOE, Inc. 3015 112thAve. NE, Ste. 101 ,' Bellevue,WA. 98004 SUBJECT: Site Plan Revision for Safeway Redevelopment(LUA98-052, SA-H, ECF) Dear Mr. Paulus: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the Safeway Redevelopment site plan. The site plan was initially approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 16, 1998. The approved site plan included the existing Safeway store (57,016 sq. ft.) and a future retail building (10,190 sq. ft.). The site plan provided parking for 352 vehicles. • The proposed site plan modification would add a gasoline service station in th southwest corner of the site. The proposed fueling'station would include a 4-dispenser pad with an atte ant kiosk (22'X 12)and an overhead canopy (38' X 65'). The station,-including surrounding vehicular circulation space, would occupir approximately 12,720 sq. ft. of the site. The overall site area is 262,000 sq. ft. Therefore, the proposed gas station would occupy '4 8%pf the overall site area. The gas station would eliminate 36 out of the 352 parking stalls. •• . , • f The proposed gas station would utilize the existing driveway cuts onto S. 3r°Str let. Vehicle circulation to the gas station would not adversely impact traffic flows In the Safeway parking lot. The.324 parking stalls that would remain on the site would satisfy the .rnlnlrrium parking requirements for both the existing Safeway store and the future retail building: , The site plan regulations define a major adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as a 'substantial change in the basic site desi8n plan, intensity, density, use and the like generally involving more than a ten percent(10%)change in.area or.-scale.'(Section 4-9-200G). The gas station area would effect Tess than 10% of the total site area. The proposed modification would decrease the number of parkirnt stalls by 10%. Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the site plan. The applicant Is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval end mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the remaining aspects of the project. The applicant should also understand that SEPA environmental review would be required prior to approval of building permits for the gas station. This decision to approve the revisions as a minor modification will have a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Therefore, an appeal of the administrative decision must be received by March 28,2000. PMT reductions (8%x 11)of the revised site plan must be submitted for the file records. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7218. Sincerely, • .ri. • son .'il1/4C)A)11(11 Zo• ng Administrator cc: Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 40 CITY F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor March 20, 2002 James D. Garrett MBI Construction Services 3114 South Proctor St. Tacoma, WA 98409 Subject: Modification of the Approved Site Plan for the Safeway Redevelopment Project File Nos. LUA-98-052, SA-H, ECF LUA-00-059, ECF Dear Mr. Garrett: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to.the approved site plan for the Safeway Redevelopment Project. This modification will supercede a modification approved March 14, 2000 (see attached). The proposed revisions have been approved as a minor modification to the approved site plan and the previous modification. The Hearing Examiner initially approved the site plan on July 16, 1998. The approved site plan included the existing 57,016 s.f. Safeway store and 352 associated parking stalls. On March 14, 2000 a modification to this site plan was approved allowing for a gas station to occupy approximately 12,720 s.f. of the Safeway site. This modification eliminated 36 parking stalls, however, the remaining 324 parking stalls satisfied minimum parking requirements. • The modification being proposed at this time would alter the site plan in order to install a temporary kiosk for the purposes of repairing the existing kiosk. Specifically, the proposal would involve the following alterations to the approved site plan: • Installing a 12-foot by 16-foot temporary kiosk with associated 3-foot by 30-foot ramp directly west of the existing kiosk • The temporary kiosk would not be placed within any required parking stalls, circulation areas or landscape buffers. The Site Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as changes which do not involve more than a 10% increase in area or scale of the development, do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 /'7r\T.,:...,.............•.......cna_.nr..nlu.l.....•...:..I OAOG....o•......nmn. Safeway Redevelopment Project Minor Modification Page 2 of 2 facilities, and do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC § 4-9- 200.H). The proposal to install a temporary 192 s.f. kiosk on a 262,000 s.f. as the existing kiosk is being repaired would be an incremental change to the site plan. Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the Safeway Redevelopment Project. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of the environmental review are still applicable to the development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental (SEPA) Review and/or Administrative Site Plan approval may be required for future modifications to the site plan. This decision to approve the proposed.revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of'`this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, April 3, 2002. If you have questions ,regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Ashley DeForest at (425) 430-7289. px :kt Sincerely s•Dttid;)4\A/VVO ,::,,,,,, me:: ye:, .4,;: 44, " 0 .0 , '''' ' .) Jennifer Henning, Zoning Administrator ''. Development Services Division -4 -,., ( ,,r .Nk v cc: Land Use Files .: `; Os' t .,} CIT )F RENTON ..it Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jeaae Trnner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 14,2000 Mr. itanley Paulus SSC E, Inc. 301:: 112th Ave. NE, Ste. 101 Bellevue, WA. 98004 SUBJECT: Site Plait Revision for Safeway Redevelopment(LUA98-052, SA-H, ECF) Dear Mr. Paulus: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the Safeway Redevelopment site plan. The site plan was initially approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 16, 1998. The approved site plan included the existing Safeway store (57,016 sq. ft.) and a future retail building (10,190 sq. ft.). The site plan provided parking for 352 vehicles. The proposed site plan modification would add a gasoline service station in th southwest corner of the site. The proposed fueling'station would include a 4-dispenser pad with an atter1ant kiosk (22'X 12')and an overhead canopy (38' X 65'). The station, including surrounding vehicular circulation space, would occupy approximately 12,720 sq. ft. of the site. The overall site area is 262;0 0 sq. ft. Therefore, the proposed gas station would occupA4,8%4cif the overall site area. The gas station would eliminate 36 out of the 352 parking stalls. • The proposed gas station would utilize the existing driveway cuts onto S. 3'd Strret. Vehicle circulation to the g is station would not adversely impact traffic flows in the Safeway parking lot. Tii i 324 parking stalls that would remain on the site would satisfy the minimum parking requirements for both the existing Safeway store and the future retail building. The :scite plan regulations define a major adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as a 'substantial change in the basic site design plan, intensity, density, use and the like generally Involving more than a ten percent(10%) change in area or scale.'(Section 4-9-200G). The gas station area would effect less than 10% of the total site area. The proposed modification would decrease the number of parking stalls by 10%. Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the site plan. The applicant Is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval end mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the remaining aspects of the project. The applicant should also understand that SEPA environmental review would be required prior to approval of building permits for the gas station. This decision to approve the revisions as a minor modification will have a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Therefore, an appeal of the administrative decision must be received by March 28,2000. PMT reductions(8%x 11)of the revised site plan must be submitted for the file records. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7218. Sincerely, .K. son Zo• nu Administrator cc: Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 modern builders el 253.383.1704 800.383.1707 FAX 253.383.1732 Construction Services http://www.modernbuildersinc.com March 20, 2002 Neil Watts City of Renton 6th Floor, City Hall 1055 Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Safeway# 1563 Temporary Gas Station Kiosk 200 South 3rd Ave., Renton Dear Mr. Watts, As per our conversations with Laureen at your office,we are requesting a Site Plan Modification for the above project. This modification is for a time period not to exceed 6 months. A site plan has been attached for your information. If you have any questions or require further information,please contact me at(253) 383-1704 or mobile#(253) 405-4037. Sincerely, es D. Garre , resident RCITY ECEIVE D MAR 2 0 2002 BUILDING DIVISION 3114 South Proctor Street • Tacoma • WA • 98409-3299 • License # MODERBI 181 Q9 Since 1954 • . i I ' I 1 I 1 , /7 1 ''t'I '6' EXIT-1 i r= •i 1 i,,, i, 1 . ' )\ FUTURE TO , , •... ... ••• ,:., 1 . I' •••,. / 4, Ni .1. I rq h , _ v t . . , c ! lt .- i I \", '—‘ ' ' t -1/1"1 . • • . __________ .., .______ • ' ' —• -' --ran--- -- -1------'------ - i ....i> S. 3rd ST 7,—, , I----.--\ r--------, ---4- N. --- P----", r : : ‘..._._...— . . . I • ".11111111.11111111M11411111111111111111116111“11111 ' IMF: 1 . -• •—___/ ._ \— ,' _ r•A SITE PLAN 0 30' 60' //. iv • - ,' L . , 1 ...-- - ---t._----jswi-e-r--' _i., :w.------- — ---------n. ____•-.1.—.& ___________,_________________________ ____ _._, _444,4t., ., ,...---- , ...--- / i•— -- — FUEL FILL PIPE )1 / -_,,v--t.------..._ >._,/,::::1/4T._.__._ , . 4--- •Nr. i -,--,--- --I-- --1 .,k/ i - (---16 ( 1 li/ 1--, \ .-.....:77"-'prZ \\ /----..,P, IP:c.r. . i 7-------'1 A/ ; /// I ?I/Y.1_, ---"• - '--1----! !,,, , 1 , --1 - o' - ,1 : 1 1 C=> • ; 01 , I i -.0 I .:: (,-....„.1 . \ olio , . ENT' Y , 0 " it • • 4 f.• 4"•'• \ il.—• \i .11:..:•„,/1..,. \ i s 0.„ I/ //II ••''•-• ,...'''' ; ; i I ' •.-- 1 1 11 .•.://—‹11) EXIT ii / _,, Af_____________.... _i___I.J...____+____-•-1---- n- _ •8_. . 1---- -N,m, 1 - . PP'i,, •••-•‘ -.t , ily/ It' 1 'It./•• I ki'/' 1 i I 1 r• ,• i •• \10 .---- , . i ,--,1 _ --r ,a,...011 I tt l• / II -- - I 1 • WH EL STO S (4), r / 11 ". II i I 1 0 i • -.. K .-- :.••• . II.= / --3.--- ' I 1 —1 0 i 1 i 1 AT NEW LO TION .•. -.. ,.II, 1 , i ..-- 41 ' tt -- • - - , I 1 1 ! I. :*. -00 kA 4 rf.tA, i„i, ,3 —1 i I 1 ' I • ___j .:.. •• L_ • ...._.1 L-•—/— — 1 -,- •.. .. \ • Ai A ,... , .:. •.: „ ..,, . . ,k v - . 1 u/A: I aph, I , 4. , •z... . ,-- -A. r.__z_s 1 2 I, ... ..._-__ ____.,. VENT RISER Al & WATER STATION „.. --I-1 v•A ' EQ. 1 EQ. / C 6) , 1\ 1 / SEE 11/F3 PUBLIC PHONE --„., 1 ' I j 67'-0" I 49'-0" I 27 -1" / CO CONNECTION CENTERED 9 , 1 \ I 71-5" 7'-2" 27'-0" 25'-6" if 51'-79 ON ISLAND, SEE:AM 4 \ ' \ )6 --1 .11 A0.2 ----1.-----> ( / I 16'-0" TYP1 1„---- ‘ 7'-10" ,9'_e i i \ 17---'—=-----Ns C5) 4'4" 10'-4"/8'-11'' / / / \ ir n • ‘c.1' ...: 1 I 1 ' I \ , 1 _ I -...• ,i % .•',I• . 8 \ 11 1 :. I•11. . . ...to,: .. , 1 1 I 1 -...7"'s : • ••'*.'• • i 1' I , •••.• 1 1 N .''...1 ... '... --;-.1-1'c .-- •: (11,' -Cr> . . . . . • .1..> 1\ i . • EXISTING STOP SIGN 1 ti 1 • ••••••'.4.117:•'• • • ,•' ' Ni. • . • CM OF BENTON EXISTING ONE WAY PROPERTY JNER E C E 1 VE-4_0 TING NDS LACAPE - ... - EXISTINQ SIGN FXIS - - -- \ // i i 1 •-I.' + EXISTING SIDEWALK / / i \ \ , ....,1 i /i 1 0 NEW LOCATION FOR DOSTING SIGNAGE ..,---,7,-, ------/ \ 1 I %A.,...- ...1; -1 7. _....,__.% _•••• --- •, SOIDINGUYIWN/ t ! i , ‘ \ -%, , •-, I \ ,EXI1TING SIGNAGE T9 BE RLOCATED ' li -0" ti 9'--0" , \ .., .. N -- ,t z i , < 1 t / / 1 t 0 i, I i - c \ ;*:-•:,.. / „ 1 EXISTING 'NO PARKING" \ \ ---. . ; —-•,..zif------- / \ „ •,.... -.... ,..../.4viut -------,.. / ONE WAY ! N, c) \ 1- - — _ _ „ • CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: July 31, 2000 TO: Land Use Files LUA-00-059, ECF LUA-98-052, SA-H, ECF FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning SUBJECT: Environmental Review for Safeway Fuel Station /Amendment to Minor Modification for Safeway Redevelopment Project 112 South 3rd Street The Safeway Fuel Station was approved as a minor modification to the approved site plan for the Safeway Redevelopment Project(LUA-98-052). The modification, which was approved on March 14, 2000, allowed for the construction of a four-island fuel station within the Safeway parking lot, including a 2,470 square foot canopy and a 264 square foot attendant kiosk. Along with the approval of the minor modification, Environmental (SEPA) Review was necessary for the fuel station project due to the installation of underground fuel storage tanks exceeding 10,000 gallons in size. With the building permit application for the Safeway Fuel Station (B000424), the applicant has proposed minor revisions to the site plan reviewed as part of the Environmental (SEPA) Review (LUA-00-059)and the minor site plan modification conducted for the project. The revision includes a 310 square foot increase to the approved 2,470 square foot canopy—for a revised canopy size of 2,780 square feet. With the proposed increase, the fuel station canopy and kiosk structures would remain below the 4,000 square foot SEPA building exemption level and, therefore, would not necessitate additional SEPA review. In addition, the proposed increase to the canopy would remain below a 10% modification to the originally approved site plan for the Safeway Redevelopment Project. A copy of the revised site plan has been incorporated into both land use files. STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: June 13, 2000 Project Name: Safeway Fuel Station Applicant: SSOE, Inc. Architects/Engineers File Number: LUA-00-059, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is proposing to construct a gas station in the southwest corner of the existing Safeway parking lot. The station would include a 2,470 square foot canopy, a 264 square foot attendant kiosk and four fuel pumps. The project would require the installation of three underground fuel storage tanks, including one 20,000-gallon tank and two 10,000-gallon tanks. (continued on page 2) Project Location: 112 South 3`d Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 2,734 square feet Site Area 12,054 square feet Total Building Area gsf 2,734 square feet RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). CI � \ \L \ ±•iLT03 % ,1. 4 I i I.. - .morons -G y�,+�w�rl�- ryyr1�t 1.Y. 4,y eos rif liaIlJmo. bi i--b 4 +ir 4 3 i "i40-..L' •',, 1 ,�-e - sr �( gip' i'1 �Io' ', i ii, M 41 r ,ou..-- L ` Y 4 • 'y' I�?Lb[�-.1 si'I �. ,,fit �I/j/ v'�i. ITS 1 i • City of Renton P/B/PW Departme i onm I Review Committee Staff Report SAFEWAY FUEL STATION LUA-00-059,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 13,2000 Page 2 of 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION(CONT.) The development of the proposed fuel station would include the grading and installation of sewer, storm, fire protection and domestic water facilities, as well as improvements to off-site landscape areas (e.g., trees and shrubs). In addition, the project would eliminate 36 existing parking spaces. After the completion of the project and the restriping of the remaining parking areas, 324 parking stalls would exist on the Safeway property. No modifications are proposed to the three existing access points to the site. The project is anticipated to begin construction August 1, 2000 and to be completed by November 1, 2000. On March 14, 2000 a letter of approval was issued for a minor modification to the Safeway Redevelopment Site Plan, file no. LUA-98-052 (approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 16, 1998), which included the proposed fuel station addition to the site. The proposed revisions were determined to effect less thanl0% of the total site area and total amount of parking spaces—qualifying as a minor modification. In addition, the 324 parking spaces proposed to remain on-site were determined to satisfy the minimum parking requirements for both the existing Safeway store and the future retail building. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE XX NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Engineering Study dated February 23, 2000, prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Fire Prevention Impacts:The proposal would create 2,470 square feet of new building area that would potentially impact the City's Fire Emergency Services. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction, applies to all development in the City. The mitigation fee for the proposed project is estimated at$1,421.68 (2,734 square feet x $0.52 = $1,421.68). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 2913, Ordinance 4527. 2. Transportation Impacts: The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips to the City street system and, therefore, is required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is calculated at a rate of$75.00 per net new average daily trip ercrpt • City of Renton P/B/PW Departme I onm I Review Committee Staff Report SAFEWAY FUEL STATION LUA-00-059,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 13,2000 Page 3 of 4 associated with the project. The fee for this proposal is estimated at$15,750.00 (210 daily trips x $75.00 = $15,750.00). The fee is payable prior to the issuance of building or construction permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on each new average weekday trip attributable to the project prior to the issuance of building and construction permits. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations;Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100, Ordinance 4527. 3. Earth Impacts:The subject site is relatively flat with little discernible elevation change across the site. The western portion of the property is currently developed with a 56,433 square foot Safeway grocery store. According to the Geotechnical Report submitted with the application, prepared by Earth Consultants Inc. dated February 23, 2000,fill depths of seven to ten feet overlay native soils consisting of varying deposits of silty sand, poorly graded sand and poorly graded gravel in the area of the proposed construction. The report states that the proposed kiosk and fueling island canopy can be supported through the use of conventional spread and continuous footing foundation systems bearing on competent native soil, the existing competent fill or on structural fill used to modify the existing site grades. Slab-on-grade floors may be similarly supported. The Geotechnical Report includes several recommendations regarding site preparation, foundations, and structural and utility designs—all of which staff will recommend the applicant comply with in order to mitigate potential erosion impacts to the site. The proposal would require excavation work for the installation of three underground fuel storage tanks to depths of approximately 15 feet below existing grade. Potential erosion impacts that may result from the proposed grading activities would be mitigated by existing code provisions which require the approval of a Construction Mitigation Plan and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan prior to the issuance of construction permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Engineering Study dated February 23, 2000, prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. with regard to the disturbance, preparation and construction of the site. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 4. Water Impacts: There are no surface water bodies nor wetlands located on the site or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Upon completion of the project, approximately 95% of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces. Drainage from the proposed canopy would be directed into the existing storm water system, while ground surface run- off will be directed to a separate basin with a high quality oil/water separator. Storm detention and water quality have previously been designed for the entire Safeway site, previously approved under File No. LUA-98-052. The underground existing vault provides both detention and water quality treatment, and has been sized for the 100- year/24-hour design storm per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The existing detention vault has been designed to provide water quality treatment for all proposed pavement areas. Because the area of the proposed fuel station was included in the calculations for the approved Safeway development, no additional detention or water quality facilities will be required. Catch basins, pipes and rain leaders will be used to convey storm water from the fuel station to the existing on-site storm system and ultimately to the existing on-site detention tank. Runoff from the concrete pad (beneath the canopy) will be collected separately from all other on-site storm water. This covered area runoff will be transported through an oil/water separator to the existing 12-inch sanitary sewer line in the Lake Avenue South right-of-way. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ercrpt • City of Renton P/B/PW Departme onrr l Review Committee Staff Report SAFEWAY FUEL STATION LUA-00-059,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JUNE 13,2000 Page 4 of 4 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. A copy of the revised site, landscape and utility plans, as well as Photo Mylar Transfer(PMT) plan reductions,will be required for the approved minor modification to the approved Safeway Redevelopment Site Plan (file no. LUA- 98-052). The satisfaction of this requirement will be necessary prior to the issuance of building permits for the proposed fueling station. 2. No utility/pavement cuts will be allowed in South 3`d Street where alternate utility connections can be made outside of paved areas. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1,500, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and one additional hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of flammable and combustible tanks, piping and monitoring alarms. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The site currently has curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and streetlights in place on the adjacent street (South 3rd Street). No additional street improvements are required. Plan Review—Water 1. The project has one existing fire hydrant within 150 feet of the site and two existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site. 2. No additional water main or fire hydrants will be required to meet the fire flow/fire code requirements per Renton Fire Department. 3. New water meter for domestic service will be required and will require a backflow prevention device to protect the water system. 4. Water System Development Charges (SDC) of$0.113 per square foot of site area, with redevelopment credits given, will be required. Plan Review—Surface Water 1. This site was included in the drainage system that Safeway installed in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. If no additional impervious surface is added to the site, no Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC)will be required. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The pump island pad will require a drainage system to collect and direct run off water to an oil/water separator and discharge to the sanitary sewer. 2. The new building will be required to connect to the sanitary sewer via a side sewer permit based on $80.00 per connection. 3. Wastewater System Development Charges (SDC) based on $0.078 per square foot of site area, with redevelopment credit given, will be required. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM July 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, and 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. ercrpt S. 2ND STREET a 1 x -------- S. 2ND STREET --- / �. I E .1-- « _/'' co $ tr� 1 . R . \ .a rr... _. Q w SITE INFO. "" SITE PLAN KEY NOTES — T•.-i: v.O� .,,,,• .{ -- � =r.,Wm. TOW 9R NX. .n W.¢(trtn.uJ O..'^"...'r�.o I I n� , I o.u..,,t _ �.ti;� 00-a-00 TO.ubsrwm WFJ ales xr. O+ o... J :Jt=� ,•r. - - - 196.Yr Y_ - ^'''+S. -� S[� / Wrt.m Pe..LOT uaisrrnc On SF. . ..>.' Or r l,1 l L Imo net.Mn W A WI.RR SFAIX42w.601 IF. p 10' 5817 2 R2'20-E 1 ,,..� •I „'c ,r ry TOM uuKalm Wu lex.Q. Issn S.F. p o,..e I' _ 1 I { •__ ■ .oF curn c DU SF. p".":.,,me eve,. i .._ + - - r..,v' — - P/P CED 1 BUILDING INFO. p,�„�",,...v,•,,, 1' �,^ >; 1 f�lNf RR R . • DEM O i�u: o............................. tr -t' . A R.s.9.o 1 �W l fR 1_ PROPOSM I .lo.x9 I Ramc Foom.nz l (N.u.1 O—............ �. r .1 r I I 1 I I I 1 ^ C-99'JD'x9' IOW SUP u. �� .�..� + I i �._ Y ■Wmc HMO • r� ' 1 NGf 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 '.,. ., EXISTING EXigTING Ram o%mom AREA • laIIMI FTC.s[re a p TACO-TIME TINE I, ! UNDEVELOPED APARTMENT BLDG. ROMEO Flan 478.3 N.' I .-N- .'tt I PARKING ANALYSIS: I. 8 Ili t 1 1 I rm—I Vert re13. I, j i 1 • 1 y _ kdoe..xaOwr"r�./1000 az. ; , 1 i ,• i : , i snam.. �o.W 330.3ED f :'F .u. --r- _ MAYO TOTAL 3�.,„.�re.SS,.=.J EXISTING 1 I I I ""a{ j 1 ' 1 r..n.. WENDY'S t I F I t l I 1 I IIAP RTT/NC II 1 A_......� _ I_�'- — t7_.�T -1 .i_ _..� tom' MENT BC0c. I x i ENTRANCE • . I • — — I I i N ( I I W , I to i ----------__—__—__ seew°ise� 1 ' 4.7. I I ' I . . i i t 7 '�y1' —�,' a`I•y+I 1 W •y10•J� 1 ) LOADING I E1 ti' ' O 1 I > '\ ■.23..99' I`; '4 -VAS' ..,� i qR,p DOCK ..The Q i ...a... A./9'.O'Y , r..rF.. SAFEWAY 1k1563 I I • I i ,A I I I 1. . x 0M I Y i 1 i I I ! , I I 56.493 tI0 FT APPROX. • / I I I 1 1 1 I ' I I I 1 .-_ YLi {. , I I— '1 -3 • , „,/, • / I .. � .. •n• lswsow Q e�I EXwU a „ _ j ...,Nu•" —III i� --` __ L �\..._/' cn9"Te �♦ ®.®T d I. I /1!t ENTRANCE .-.4 w 'i ice '. T I i .- i I -.•, H_�1 ""� _JR,_r._r_. .tr•t n.. r9■W■{R'w 9 N _ Y III i. • I!! i A ...o 'w. .., rr 6 �} t n. - ^'' S. 3RD STREET •�. e - ^^ µ, k I7J`fir o w i N_I N P ,f L!1 1 U I a } L•1 ra r t ‘ mask A.01 - " .. cam • CSC CB ,�}• 1 i - •:{:. i.ie.ve(EI •'^_ SAFEWAY •; t? 1. [-xa.as(,YwJ ci In r rn YE-2e e.cre + • c-:ex(2 C) r--��+-� `` i `-ab)TIr'q .. Y,A .." • ` OO En z ,:.2e.sl(s , `/ / -•. c F n p ox1 Ore) y'•1 V. m•w.5msPS Y / e PIgP EL x).N——— M I / / W ^ 'y ———— I .'13. .. •x Cd n 1 N(AT SOOCUT�R•1 s °�tucc LL Q'^ 1 hE au ' I — \ / • • I St N —.AT EK . CO .) •—__, il . ..,:r,I A 1 1, ' r r ' ' 1 : I : ,------1-1-1-1--1 -1-1.--1---1--1-•+-1 04-17-00 r, .4101,M 1 I ; • s e/I) 7Y I • • :Li.L ~ qi ; �i�p') •s.TIE-zaee i -a.uW4.10.11 .,{., 6:iiiig- "cvT X Co w- / NAT OTi / CO TOE ' • • ! -� •zn.ee e e. J'� I�P1.101-,:.1.1-.0 AJaso:cf [ xll .]tt rz J,a — a-11.21 i •I. TTT. d ill • �� • 11 1611 1; 1 SE PC�JQ20•1 ir% / •'� (4- .... Yp Yt. %/ V ' �.1,1 al'YrY \ O_ • � TAILca't ;•; -,.» Ill •:P.n, # I ' .. # JC+2.tse TEN.2S -2a.ee I I .c}. xEn awe 'SAND ' • GI a i\I . P/�N f D' �RTE. , IP I/� >`y — ri7,4.1 : i :P • • \ --•-3 / ,n 1v 11'i• j3_ — Wv._.kv L bv,..-4+wvAv_=As Wv- AW ,,.l - ___ ___ - C7« \- EW SIGN lE�J1.02__1 —_� �cu _` _- '}b pp JJ'yy Y `— ' 4- - R' .,_,...•Crux "� , • CORE / i F2 w it 1 . — �.. ......-'Ex slat fi --"_- YATtN ,. uA CN E,.. '.'....'� �..a r,c - ss: --- -`I -. ° __�2 _-- :']] II I'._iZ vs 4. TOP p PIPE •z elO J R �J 1� S 1 .•f'. ..q.y Q a So +N-1 2 ? »»_» _» ,» »_�7».» n »�._.i.EL.27.29 .i _ J / 1 L. �" LL— I wIPgIT w.Y'1 Po.,. NK• , O ` rSITE o D BEET MU DEMI cn SCFEIIATIC Io o ' Y r a aw s� GRAPHIC SCALE CI, O VICINITY MAP /,N agoIN�'Iwt,•10,, �_ � , i I , i I / P V I i I I I � I / � / � Va 6/ CS) • •55, uP6 n J MI m6eam •„. )11`l XIP i; 5 p .4-- .. I xYILW 1 O / .I.,,` v T—OM GR MAOOL fff 0 CC W L WIC PALMS TO BE MANS.RN oosiu 6 LA1dbAK w..n __ 91O11 SCHEMEDPSTAMGE Cf. ISLAND TO BE REMCMED --1''''"r- •' O COVER SPAGINS mrs Q f / /1,-, V m - f ► iI Db1�s Ij �$ ; EN. W7 LL�i _ 00. REMOVE ALortawt ANNIALT AS REEVE,To WALL . ::ie. :_ NOx6AT WI NEN)5 AILMENT TO OM AS SPEWED Q 1 ; ? i • I I I I ' .I S .'6.00 iI.��' / - ESTABLISH LMpR N 6gCNE, CD '• r i lA/paiq , SCOCR PM RAN • I I�� I . I I �� ' , `'HAl -- AVMs'MANS _DR SM__ SODO' ISRATI.T/LR.,6 OQSTNO '� �t' MOPE OJ-06-OD 5LN0 D I EKSTINS LAN DSCAPE �,. N@IOVID RPP1 ELMS TO OE MACAW BIT) __ '. 4 I ENSTINS VNOSiCAPE _ .... 'O''Tp1 EOM—)O(T)] TO RB4AIM fITT•J TO RE LAADMAM M MP) w•wT TOPSOIL As STtnE, C L r � R., A.- =_ , CP� a ''I I0�4 6k • / MY YECFICAna6• SMOLA pins NMI'MN. !!R b • _y. +f I ;� • ,,,,A4-0A..• ' L------- O ISLAND DETAIL ++ -- � 'IM�O E.`(IS NIS �T}+s°R E�MH \` -% ,t YO��IAN IttP1M .__, • 0 11141114 Oft _�, S. 3 R D S-R E E T ' ,�;' YORE GAY PI N LqB P pi iill �! A: srRAw REP N ANISE 6Nv. . ,t,- PIKE MAPPED R GLEAN . O 10' Do' tl' W' I �I VINfL.TVSTi OO 7..n._' PII!1REE STAKES•WM e R • s•KORWL roar IF•ALE'.I••Y,'-O' Pi,VIr TR[£S M6N S6•ow nee YOU IN , IF PLANT SCHEDULE F,OI'w TO ALLEI A R A EAS.F LL n N + POSIcr VE ORAIIME 7p ®N �ryyz50150E BOTNMClL RATE 1 GOWEN NNE SEE MOIL !io, raPNQ � E/ � LANDSCAPE NOTES Epp �i La,&MET� I. 600IAL COx1RAL1OR TO CLEAR NID 6R0B ALL PEN LAWSCAPE AMEN ifJrt,, BNAOMLnr mawoFP6.N5 GE1NSIi$tA tO'PtTRT/t8'P(,Ri EtpHONb PJM 7 GAL. B I q NATGm POW AND SET ES TO OE•/AT'.P6P15 Fw*I N R/CTOR OOIERA 14S FOR I — - „-I=III 504_TOISOL NO SON NAn.2 �/ ELEWADE6 To EE H-ISO'.IX613ERALNFOR CONORACTOR TO 5ET FwSHI H MIN=6 tl 111 l=lll SELL NTL 5PFLPxE, AGM RLTaaA+DOWEL'/eor«Au.ALE 7 cos.. 6 1 q MATLIm PORPP ELEVATIONS FOR AREAS TO IX IIrDPOEEIDED - PBLBLIaR To wA •O D. LANIDXE CONTRACTOR• L%..ARIFY*O6RAOE5.PLACE 17 OP �-- PIM 146RA/A15TDAN PINE 6'NT. 5 1 IL NATCIC KSM9 M PORN SF SOIL MIX NO ETOIERT5 IN ALL PMR 00111 F6/WC-P' ••I.-f.... S.•--_. (REFER TO OETNL FOR FLANTIP6*.MOST NO TNOROM4.I ROTOTLL r *KOS SE SOMJN@OMQOS INTO TIE•J.86RADE PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. O TYMC.AL TREE PLANflN6 r 8 PO Fl0A65 L.'OTTO UMW/OTTO lY J F0.1A6E O L LALR S SAL. PIE N'OL. S. GRAM LONA SHALL BE INSTALL®CONTPLOS IA032 OIL TREES O I-" N CI JMF965 CIL PFITZILAIA CLPPACTA'/COPACT PF/TIER JANNSI S 6AL FILL MAN,BP OL. AND SHR105.NNNTADI AN ID'SETBACK FOR ENO GONER FROM TIE BASE NO 5/005. ' SR CPO* MISERY CO N E O`T PORPEMNS A I.P PE16M —NI 109 ERICA CAAIEA 5PRMwGOo PINK'/WUNMOOD PIIx(EASIER 16A1 24 00 N TKO A NP 541 BM MEAS OWL DEE J NAVE PEN-FIR MEDIUM BARK NALN WALLED - fR+ �W y'1' 6.MK NL!PER SPECSw= 6110./1Y•.7.15t 5. NO PRE-OER6EIR HERBICIDES*ALL BE NRI®TO MY MOW COVER s` O W ) op ops OL TO Z %, ARATOSTAsxnos INA URN/KIP*K1N,IK 4.POTS MO oL. E85. •1:ts.", rum PER �'SPECS _r^ z 6. REFER TO CIVIL ET61N�INS DRAri)65 FOR 6RADIN6,DRAwNE ANDCD a o MUSES 11EO/NATION.REFER TO AR0ITFLTMAL ERA/PISS FOR SITE LAIOYT. 1IIPI Q CC 1.=._ EXISTING TREE LEGEND: -um -L. a:3 ' UMW.MLL„ON cV 7 EMIST111 TREES TO REMAN -MAIM IUN ILO aT EMAP REAM M 6)6 N�ATTRIN ® -k,u 1pl ®(III MMIIIIIsL6j=11 1- DM*TREES TO BE REMOVED -tl ,-.''- '...-1111U�tl=tl INltlElll4 IA (APE 2 K 1,5150I.1 DA , PLAN OTYPICAL SH �PL RANTINb al pOM OF mia.Ear, NA p\,�Q L-1 4. • NOTE: (Si 1 M COSMG SIR IS 6 E,LLCD x.VKNC. 701 (NSW GODxD[Ilv.nM R 65 2 X 1eM WFLr lY-p °KiOx[MOJ2CM feSl. 1 Fla R4R%I BRw FM ... DEIKCD KO { 'v''' (S ' .0.Cap'HD 2 11761114.Nn•CE GU[12311. -0 `0• PARMC DJ2C C.SW COLOR 1.11 SAFEWAY x1661:NOSH S1xu(ME '.4 �'. "xxa 4Wx.n0 A J R w E°S1�D J,R,E11K .:7 gGaggviGa «E z -6 1 !ltili 1 j DO Kn4.vrt nR. 17.1 ZC0.M pwR.rmZ160 .R s/ I1 II - °DDE vat,e'oEcxl.caM- s- '". :xrt O'7C '* U--I z 10 UV J122PROPOSED 7' - xMWV 312PROPOSED E2R- 0 fU20xC OD2C, w 1- 011 I GDDxD Ty_� �—�. EOJKO GaM a�D 1=[t[r MeO" ll 1 .�/.- 4Ev:JIi6' ( I.W - �I. .I� / ■tx1IDaG.eie2[ crie� v 3 SAMMY MD U LOCO¢C.C¢M' IStxrtl.COLOR OAK GU SV 2CK 032[ )<j N 8 PFjSED FUEL STATION WEST ELEVATION 4 ,JE4STAT10N SOUTH ELEVATION °�.. °fie W LL. Q CO 05-29-00KC � 6 41 "gM1D 4 — ■ea a"�""" MOH Pa a MK"oo5 Arlo., DK .xDRS PROPOSED GROUND 'I-pv 31107 i.i; 0-I1 pIy v ill lil �inner I i! L Pc ■ 7 139 OSED RJEL STATION EAST ELEVATION BEd STATION NORTH ELEVATION t1.1 R.S0Ex `7 au'r u.2G SNCCO x v.G Wr. w1M 20 xx.r 70 w1M COCK = C..R. D.E.R110 (rw) 1— 11w1 PUS...11R.1 •G Mee PLASTER 5 MAK nxsrtn MSx 1001 _ _-- —_ 1°')a _. of , x1 L�MDR 1- C71.011 i. MARK swty,er , "" s-u-ex ro.Of 11 11 CMM 0011111.011 a AN,Iry 1 J ` s lw N SKM MUM n SWAMP ' U _ xxWC nOx MKM DutSE°H III■ p PUMP t2 .. _ .. pp SNOT 1 COSr-10 nO OPEN.IA: w66,(x)CMKC210 1. . K2-1131 Eu 11131162-1634 'n.---- 61 wKMusl 111x.1 I'L �, I • ,.� L z ®1 KE us SICK CAP 113P) 0 1— Yu1 ExQ RUM Nx.(r1v) LWZ f KIM./RNCCn 1 1/2"KUSISO WAD e Q O vAUS1YCx1 Ai. M111011 AREA 6K�9SIS WEST ELEVATION KIOSK SOUTH ELEVATION Cl) - 1j.1_D 21,..1-D _ 3 .1111 _ � w.ON1xKwrML W /fG 2M2 SLOPE. .I a'I �J [ gooW tO O 1 4fr- CV `..f..T.I.`,1" . ...ME .., :, aEETmF r - 3 !x;�R� • y 003023 1 1/]0 00016660*NUR A-3 r KIOSK EAST ELEVATION 0 1 4 I KIOSK CROSS SECTION vincv 11(71[3,3 CI�,.nn,i 0 2 1 e r 1 ;} CIr. V OF, RENTON ,1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 14, 2000 Mr. Stanley Paulus SSOE, Inc. . 3015 112th Ave. NE, Ste. 101 Bellevue,WA. 98004 SUBJECT: Site Plan Revision for Safeway Redevelopment(LUA98-052, SA-H, ECF) Dear Mr. Paulus: Th s letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the Safeway Redevelopment site plan. The site plan was initially approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 16, 1998. The approved site plan included the existing Safeway store (57,016 sq. ft.) and a future retail building (10,190 sq. ft.). The site plan provided parking for 352 vehicles. The proposed site plan modification would add a gasoline service station in th southwest corner of the site. The proposed fueling station would include a 4-dispenser pad with an atte ant kiosk (22'X 12') and an overhead canopy (38' X 65'). The station, including surrounding vehicular circulation space, would oc:upy approximately 12,720 sq. ft. of the site. The overall site area is 262,0110 sq. ft. Therefore, the proposed gas station would occupy4$9b1of the overall site area. The gas station would eliminate 36 out of the 352 parking stalls. The proposed gas station would utilize the existing driveway cuts onto S. 3rd Street. Vehicle circulation to the+gas station would not adversely impact traffic flows in the Safeway parking lot. The 324 parking stalls that would remain on the site would satisfy the minimum parking requirements for both the existing Safeway store and the future retail building. The site plan regulations define a major adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as a "substantial change in the basic site design plan, intensity, density, use and the like generally involving more than a ten percent(10%) change in area or scale.'(Section 4-9-200G). The gas station area would effect less than 10% of the total site area. The proposed modification would decrease the number of parking stalls by 10%. Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the site plari. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the remaining aspects of the project. The applicant should also understand that SEPA environmental review would be required prior to approval of building permits for the gas station. This decision to approve the revisions as a minor modification will have a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Therefore, an appeal of the administrative decision must be received by March 28,2000. PMT reductions (8 1/2 x 11) of the revised site plan must be submitted for the file records. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7218. Sincerely, 0Zo son ng Administrator cc: Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 y . SPr�g -6SZ 1111111111111111111111111111 20000111001492 PAGE 001 01/11//2000F14:35 TRANSNATION TI EAS KING COUNTY, WA Return Address: 12.00 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Office of the City Clerk Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 96055 Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): 8(oC58-)01 EG �.3/a6 4 -1 Access Easement VA aq-0nj 5//'-) oc) rn ( c� o Reference Number(s) of Documents amended: o (on page of document(s)) Grantor(s): FILED rOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF 0 TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO. 1. Dale Walker and Cheryl Walker 2. Richard M. Snyder and Jeanne C. Snyder (All aka "Subaru") Grantee(s): 1. Safeway Inc. Legal description (abbreviated): Ptn H.H. Tobin Donation Claim No. 37, Ptn Gvmnt Lot 9, situate in Sec. 18, TWP 23 N, Rg 5 E, W.M. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account No.: Ptn 000720-0199, 000720-0211, 000720-0212, 000720-0119, 000720-0004 The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED King Co. Records Division By C , Deputy WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: 720 Rainier Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Access Easement This Access Easement is made as of the 22-el-J day ofd. Qip, 1999 by Safeway Inc. ("Grantor") in favor of DALE WALKER and CHERYL WALKER, husband and wife, and RICHARD M. SNYDER and JEANNE C. SNYDER (collectively, "Grantee"). WHEREAS, Grantee is the owner of certain property more particularly described in Exhibit A ("Grantee's Property"), adjacent to certain real property owned by Grantor. WHEREAS, a portion of Grantee's Property is currently leased to Ruth and Marshall Cook ("Tenant") for the operation of a coffee kiosk (the "Coffee Kiosk"), pursuant to a Lease dated February 1, 1997 (the "Kiosk Lease"). WHEREAS, Grantor has agreed to grant to Grantee an easement for access over a portion of Grantor's property, for purposes of vehicular access to the Coffee Kiosk for the CT/ duration of the Kiosk Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor hereby grants to Grantee a nonexclusive easement for vehicular access only over and across the property more particularly described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Access Easement"). The Access Easement is for the sole purpose of providing vehicular access to the Coffee Kiosk for the remaining term of the Kiosk Lease. The Access Easement shall terminate on the expiration or earlier termination of the Kiosk Lease, and in any event shall terminate no later than January 31, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Access Easement as of the day and year first above written. SAFEWAY INC. (a Delaware corporation) By Its Ass' ant ice Pr ent By Its Ass. tant Secretary 048aed1(08/11/99) 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ) On October 25, 1999, before me, Sylvia Burnett, Notary Public, personally appeared Sharman Braff and Jerome P. Harrison personally known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacity, and that by their signatures on the instrument, the persons or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. • SYLVIA BURNETT t COMM. #1122050 0 tz• 1PO,W, 'VOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA C11 o *Tr .:;OUN1' )1 ALAMEDA Cr) r � Hwy t;ann I cxpires Jan.15.2001 Signature NA 1.-- ( eal) c , co 0 CD co 0 CJ ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN DONATION CLAIM NO. 37 AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 9 IN SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVE. (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 3RD STREET (FORMERLY 3RD AVE. ) ; THENCE NORTH 88°40 ' 50" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 686. 22 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°40 ' 50" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 31. 29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°O1 ' 02" EAST 39 . 14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°52 ' 26" WEST 31. 21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°07 ' 37" WEST 38.49 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAFEWAY, INC. BRYAN L. CAMPBELL, P.L. S. r h ..\..�.�..N�M� BRH JOB NO. 98095. 01 JULY 27, 1999 111A:S744;,p491 "mil :Q •.� • ' 10A,•BS113.•• 411 AL LA V o EXPIRES 08005? D i C .1 . ...---"----------V / .... ..- :•-•',..- / c.p N .i., 0. ......-...... u5 ‘IS- ....--....... . ... ,• .. :-: .......... ow .... ...:--..,.,.,.. ,;.'....... z .. ,..) 0 ........ .. — ..,:,...".- '::-...r-, -- . kli r 30 •...... 05°;) > PROPOSED I < A Ygn01.1 AN). N89°52'26-W LOT 2 c i.turiwor,....ne,ze.e.87.44/1", ',It:, LU A-99-0 89-LLA 0 cf3 31.21 I D 1.-.11 I 4*.7.3•1:C0. :041,-'.'"\ .• •.•••• n cb Oil if < I 411:itr., c.,.4....cal . ,...... 8,,, P044T Of . • CO= b 41 COMMENCING g. o 2 30' ; ,s.".. :" 31.29' 1 \II7r)IT 77.32' S88.40 50 W 686.22-;''.- 577.50'(RI ---\ 577.6r(C)1 a '4- li i tPi .'gISTS?:1'.' 5 ON' e, AL LA0010 kl ACCESS EASEMENT :2141'b t EXPIRE.S0 ; 8da o TRLE PONT 61° b 4 04 Of BEGINNING v..:el C7 IINC.....NA.'.....'' '' 0 ar AI I$ 6-2-99 F-OUNO PK -\ . .. . Q S. 3RD STREET S-11-get S-08.40.50W 607.54' CITY OF RuiroN SURVEY .0........ CONTROL POINT NO.1140---j •••".".""' ACCESS EASEMENT SKETCH BR 14 BUSH,ROED & HITCHINGS,INC. PREPARED FOR: S ,AFEWAY INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE.E. (206)323-4144 RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SEATTLE,WA 98102-3513 BAN JOB NO.98095.01 7-27-99 Z 6 41 [ 0 Oi i •Ji 0 00Z 'I S �8 -c Z 111111111111111 20000111001494 PGE 01/11//200001 F14:35 TRANSNATION TI COV KING COUNTY, WA 18.00 Return Address: WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Office of the City Clerk Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 90056 rn Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): g68a7ae(A673!/ar839q— // ca Declaration of Restrictive Covenants �!-(�t aq' ��q� //B o Reference Number(s) of Documents amended: co (on page of document(s)) 0 0 Grantor(s): 1. Safeway Inc. Grantee(s): FILED FOR RECORD Al THE AEOUES1 OF TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO 1. Public Legal description (abbreviated): Ptn Gvmnt Lots 9 & 10, Ptn Tracts 12, 13 & 14 of Renton Shorelands, Second Sup Maps Adjacent to said Gvmnt Lots 9 & 10, Ptn Vacated Lake Avenue per City of Renton Ordinance No. 4971, all situate in Sec. 18, TWP 23 N, Rg 5 E, W.M. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account No.: 182305-9071, 000720-0119, 00720-0211, 00720-0212, 000720-0004 The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants WHEREAS, Safeway Inc. ("Covenantor"), a Delaware corporation, is the owner of the real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Lot 2") and the adjacent real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described in Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Store Property"). WHEREAS, parking provided on Lot 2 is necessary to meet code requirements for the improvements to be constructed on the Store Property. WHEREAS, the owner of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land. cn NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes, grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described, as follows: Cr RESTRICTIVE COVENANT 0 1. Covenantor covenants and agrees that fee ownership of Lot 2 shall never be conveyed separately from fee ownership of the Store Property, except as expressly provided herein. 0 2. In the event that Lot 2 is no longer necessary to meet the code parking requirements of the use being made on the Store Property, this Restrictive Covenant shall be of no further force or effect, or appropriately amended. This may occur, among other things, in any of the following circumstances: (a) code parking requirements change; (b) the Store Property has available to it sufficient parking to meet code (which may be accomplished by a lot line adjustment changing the Store Property); or (c) the use or improvements on the Store Property changes necessitating lesser parking pursuant to the City Code. In such event, the City of Renton shall execute such release or other documents appropriate to release the Covenant from the public records or amend the same to release from this Covenant that portion of the land no longer required under City Code for parking. 3. Covenantor covenants and agrees that fee ownership of any of the various parcesl comprising the Store Property shall never be conveyed separately without benefit of short plat or subdivision (other than by a space lease). 0489rcx3(06/30/99) 1 4. Any violation or breach of this Restrictive Covenant may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining the subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. SAFEWAY INC., a Delaware corporation By: Its Assi tant ice-PPre4• t By: Its A istant Secretary r-- 0 0 0489rcx3(06/30/99) 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ) On October 25, 1999, before me, Sylvia Burnett, Notary Public, personally appeared Sharman Braff and Jerome P. Harrison personally known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacity, and that by their signatures on the instrument, the persons or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. _ , :, BYLVIA BURNETT C �•`f COMM #1122050 O A, WAk H�In NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA c° � ++<<�� COUNTY OF ALAMEDA " `s M Cantu,Expires Jan.15, " Signature 41 t(LQ (Se�arl) 0 c� LOT 2 DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN DONATION CLAIM NO. 37 AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 9 AND 10, AND THAT PORTION OF TRACTS 12, 13 AND 14 OF RENTON SHORELANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, ADJACENT TO SAID GOVERNMENT LOTS 9 AND 10, AND THAT PORTION OF VACATED LAKE AVENUE PER CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 4714 RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9804220125, ALL SITUATED IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVE. (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 3RD STREET (FORMERLY 3RD AVE. ) ; THENCE NORTH 88°40'50" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 577. 61 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01°19 ' 10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 140. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°40'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 8.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF LAKE STREET, ACCORDING TO SAID RENTON SHORE LANDS MAPS, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 57°59 '28" WEST; THENCE NORTH 57°59 ' 28" WEST 30. 00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID LAKE STREET, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 57°59 '28" WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF c" 224 . 69 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE CURVE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY AN ARC o DISTANCE OF 24.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06°15'45"; co THENCE RADIALLY NORTH 64°15'13" WEST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID LAKE STREET; THENCE NORTH 88°19 '25" WEST 61.83 FEET; o THENCE SOUTH 00°07 '37" : WEST 189.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 3RD STREET; o THENCE SOUTH 88°40' 50" EAST 108. 61 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN o TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL 182305-9071 LOT 2OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-010-82 , OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SURVEY RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8211239011, BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10 AND TRACTS 10 AND 11 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL, ALL IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. ; TOGETER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED LAKE AVENUE SOUTH PER CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4640 RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9611150135; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Cr, 0 0 r-- 0 0 0 0 N EXHIBIT "B" SAFEWAY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL NO. 000720-0119 THAT PORTION OF THE HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION CLAIM NO. 37, IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 89°47 ' 00" WEST 88 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89°47 ' 00" WEST 112 FEET, TO A POINT HEREIN AFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A"; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89°47 ' 00" WEST 100 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°13 ' 00" WEST 461.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPE LINE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PIPE LINE TO A POINT NORTH 00°13 ' 00" WEST FROM POINT "A" ; THENCE SOUTH 00°13 ' 00" EAST 200 FEET TO A POINT NORTH 00°13 '00" WEST 254.81 FEET FROM POINT "A" ; THENCE SOUTH 73°51' 15" EAST 208 . 44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°13 '00" EAST 76.09 FEET, TO A POINT NORTH 00°13 '00" WEST 120 FEET FROM SAID NORTHWEST PLAT CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 89°47 ' 00" WEST 88 FEET TO A POINT NORTH 00°13 ' 00" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Q, THENCE SOUTH 00°13 ' 00" EAST 120 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF -* BEGINNING; CD c EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVENUE (SHATTUCK STREET) ; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF CD WASHINGTON. 0 CD 0 N EXHIBIT "B" SAFEWAY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL NO. 000720-0211 THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN DONATION CLAIM 37, IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVENUE (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 3RD STREET (FORMERLY 3RD AVENUE) ; THENCE NORTH 88°40 '50" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 300. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH O1°19 ' 10" EAST 250.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88°40 ' 50" WEST 218.36 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 30 FEET EASTERLY FROM (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO) THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 14, RENTON SHORELANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS; THENCE NORTH 12°22 '06" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 216. 17 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE PIPE LINE RIGHT-OF- WAY; THENCE SOUTH 88°22 ' 20" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN 176. 94 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 01°19 ' 10" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01°19 ' 10" WEST 211.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT SOUTH 89°47 ' 00" WEST 300. 00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°13 ' 00" WEST TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPE LINE, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. EXHIBIT "B" SAFEWAY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL NO. 000720-0212 THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN CLAIM NO. 37 , AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT 14 OF RENTON SHORELANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, ALL SITUATED IN SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH THIRD STREET (FORMERLY THIRD AVE. ) ; THE SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°40 ' 50" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN, 537. 61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH O1°19 ' 10" EAST, 140. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°40 ' 50" WEST, 40 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°19 ' 10" WEST 140. 00 FEET TO SAID NORTH MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 88°40 '50" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" SAFEWAY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TAX PARCEL 000720-0004 THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN CLAIM NO. 37 , AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT 14 OF RENTON SHORELANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, ALL SITUATED IN SECTION 18 ,' TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH THIRD STREET (FORMERLY THIRD AVE. ) ; THE SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°40 ' 50" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN, 300.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01°19 ' 10" EAST, 250 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°40 ' 50" WEST, 219 . 46 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 30 FEET EASTERLY FROM (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 14 OF SAID RENTON SHORELANDS; THENCE NORTH 12°20 '05" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 216. 34 FEET TO THE SOUTH cy - MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY; - THENCE NORTH 88°19 ' 25" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 30. 53 FEET TO THE cp• WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 14 ; THENCE SOUTH 12°20 ' 05" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 245 . 74 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 254 . 69 FEET FOR A -- DISTANCE OF 87 . 46 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 57°59 '28" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 88°40 ' 50" EAST 8 . 98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°19 ' 10" WEST 140 . 00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH • MARGIN OF SOUTH THIRD STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88°40 ' 50" EAST 277 . 50 • FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF, IF ANY, LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT SOUTH 89°47 ' 00" WEST 300. 00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°13 ' 00" WEST TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPE LINE, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN CLAIM NO. 37, AND THAT PORTIONP OF SITUATED IN SECTION CT 14 OF 0N 18,5 TOWNSHIPS, SECOND 23 NORTH, ANGE SUPPLEMENTALEA MAPS, ALL W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH THIRD STREET (FORMERLY THIRD AVE. ) ; THE SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°40 ' 50" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN, 537 .61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01°19 ' 10" EAST, 140. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°40 ' 50" WEST, 40. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH SOUTH 88 409' 50"' WEST EAST ALONGO0 FEET TO SAID NORTH SAID NORTH 40.00AFEET; THENCE TO a> THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. o TOGETHER ONWITH THAT ORDINANCEPORTION NO. 4640F VACATED LAKE AVENUE RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING o OFFRENT NO. 9611150135; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF oWASHINGTON. 0 0 0 cv EXHIBIT "B" SAFEWAY PROPERTY 41, CITY F RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 14, 2000 Mr. Stanley Paulus SSOE, Inc. 3015 112th Ave. NE, Ste. 101 Bellevue, WA. 98004 SUBJECT: Site Plan Revision for Safeway Redevelopment(LUA98-052, SA-H, ECF) Dear Mr. Paulus: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the Safeway Redevelopment site plan. The site plan was initially approved by the Hearing Examiner on July 16, 1998. The approved site plan included the existing Safeway store (57,016 sq. ft.) and a future retail building (10,190 sq. ft.). The site plan provided parking for 352 vehicles. The proposed site plan modification would add a gasoline service station in the southwest corner of the site. The proposed fueling station would include a 4-dispenser pad with an attendant kiosk (22'X 12') and an overhead canopy (38' X 65'). The station, including surrounding vehicular circulation space, would occupy approximately 12,720 sq. ft. of the site. The overall site area is 262,000 sq. ft. Therefore, the proposed gas station would occupy 4.8% of the overall site area. The gas station would eliminate 36 out of the 352 parking stalls. The proposed gas station would utilize the existing driveway cuts onto S. 3rd Street. Vehicle circulation to the gas station would not adversely impact traffic flows in the Safeway parking lot. The 324 parking stalls that would remain on the site would satisfy the minimum parking requirements for both the existing Safeway store and the future retail building. The site plan regulations define a major adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as a "substantial change in the basic site design plan, intensity, density, use and the like generally involving more than a ten percent (10%) change in area or scale."(Section 4-9-200G). The gas station area would effect less than 10% of the total site area. The proposed modification would decrease the number of parking stalls by 10%. Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the site plan. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the remaining aspects of the project. The applicant should also understand that SEPA environmental review would be required prior to approval of building permits for the gas station. This decision to approve the revisions as a minor modification will have a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Therefore, an appeal of the administrative decision must be received by March 28, 2000. PMT reductions (8 %x 11) of the revised site plan must be submitted for the file records. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425)430-7218. Sincerely, Jana Nson Zoning Administrator cc: Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 60 This paper contains 50°°recycled material,20'°post consumer 'S -052 , 54� SSOE, INC. ARCHITECTS• ENGINEERS March 2, 2000 Ms. Jana Hanson, RE: Minor modification determination/ Zoning Administrator, Fueling Station, Renton City Hall, 6th Floor Safeway Store # 1563 1055 S. Grady Way 209 S. 2nd Street, Renton Renton, WA 98055 SSOE Project No. 00-5023-00 Dear Ms. Hanson: 3015 112th Ave.NE,Ste. 101 SSOE has been commissioned by Safeway Inc. to provide consulting services for Bellevue, WA 98004-8001 building a fueling station on the above site. Telephone 425.827.2950 Facsimile 425.827.8412 w w w . s s o e . c o m I am writing to request reviewing this project for a minor modification determination, based on the information below. The proposed fueling station includes a 4-dispenser pad with a single attendant kiosk (22' X 12') and an overhead canopy of 38' x 65'. The station, including surrounding vehicular circulation space occupies approximately 12,720 sq. ft. This station is an adjustment to the Safeway site plan. The area that the proposed station would occupy is only (4.8%) of the overall site area of 262,000 sq. ft. As for parking, currently the site has 344 parking stalls plus 10 stalls for staff parking to the east of the building. The final parking count, after adding the future retail pad, is 360 stalls. The station would eliminate 36 stalls or only 10% of the final parking count, thus resulting in 324 stalls. I trust that the above information and the enclosed site plan would be sufficient for your review to qualify as a minor modification. Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 425.827.2950 Sincerely, SSOE, Inc. gaga Stanley Paulus, R.A. Project Manager cc: Ms. Laura Delaney—Safeway Inc. Toledo,OH Troy,MI Nashville,TN Bellevue,WA C:\TEMP\zoning030100.doc • rob- 9.0 City of Seattle Paul Schell, Mayor Seattle Public Utilities Diana Gale,Director February 16, 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Bob Gambill 2 1 MOSr. Real Property Agent FEB SPU - Real Property Services - WTR doRECEIVED 10th mail room Dexter Horton Building 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1714 Mr. Peter Rosen City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: LUA-98-052, SA-H,ECF / Safeway Development Dear Mr. Rosen: The purpose of this letter is to provide notice that Seattle Public Utilities would like Safeway to remove the 3 existing street trees that are located in SPU's pipeline right-of-way as part of its current landscaping project. SPU has also asked that Safeway plant only grass, shrubs, and or/small ornamental trees in the right-of-way. All of the large street trees in the right-of-way are a concern to SPU because the trees are very close to, or directly on top of the 66 inch water pipeline. The pipeline is not deep in this location and the roots and the weight of these trees are hazards to the pipeline. They also create an obstacle to maintenance. Therefore, SPU would like all of these large trees removed from its right-of-way. What, if anything, does SPU need from the City of Renton in order to have these trees removed? If anyone connected with this project needs additional information please contact me at 206- 684-5969. Sincerely, e -rj4 Bob Gambill cc: To File, Joe Mickelson, Sandy Gray Ct.) Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor,710 Second Avenue,Seattle,WA 98104 Tel:(206)684-5851,TTY/TDD:(206)233-7241,Fax:(206)684-4631,Internet Address:http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us/util/ An equal employment opportunity,affirmative action employer.Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request. LUA-gel 057 514 AM 1••••7 ..""rn ' 4.66DIMIa ! 16216111,WAG. let--4 149 0•AFFE'M.A.0 .ri.& 4, , 1 , 01 ' , , • Iff , •ff • 1 FOOD NW - GEBB3W8j, f t I TIT TT T T , L._,._,_.....,_,,.......... , 1 I BB # z ,EEEIEBEBE IELEM-11 EH EH ii EEIEB tu VT INZVATION ..•.,,, - F • — • 1 , . • • . . ...• . .... 111 ,. .) •••• •••• .... •••• •••• •..._1 I :::: I I:::: II cr:1 , E I :::: ••••.... _ EAST 1:12VATION SOY•re. iln . .. / .."`................................ • I p . I DOWNS IP ART.e.rr ELM. , El - - ; , 7 T 1 T 1 1 7 T ,..1--• 4 t p ! sollY14 ELEVATION sor•r4r • EXTT-1 1.111W 1 VIVRE RETAL MASH I , ...J L. 1 ENCLOS.RE AREA DONN* ____,.....„1 .... C•EKRETE MO( opframerr ELM. 1 ec, -rr TET W.::1-1 •••• - PROPOSED SAFEVik" 41563 SCREENINS/441. •• NORTH ELEVATION 610.•ra• ...... 4, rwie sp. .... s . ki-r----- I co,Pocrat ELEVATIONS : -'1! ----- ! SECTIONE IIIRE....., • 1, I ,I ...- we PLAN I I .. fi k1 , , , .019MAJ.SAWS--1 .-"I APPLICATIoN /I i li 1, I' III 4.---.V.1.0111 rIALL. '1 .14 ACTT&owes-1 • `-' - 1 i , i 1 66,016.664 0 .4. ,:, • IMPOW 1. C 1 I ! (....' .. Il\ i il li I , r--—--- 1.0•060004. 21:61.1146.4 g! -\--dorm No LOADS* • nom60666.6.u. 1140“...a "SI* trmaim.ins rvit r•21, =NON AT EAfff niongtrf LPIE C 16116..NT SWIM AT SC4JTH MD STREET • •Ar•No -. A2.0 q-r( CITY OF RENTON �g 'b 52_ ' S�{ MEMORANDUM DATE: August , 1999 TO: City Clerk's Office FROM: Laureen Nicolay, Development Services Division SUBJECT: Safeway/Subaru Lot Line Adjustment, LUA99-089, LLA Attached please find the above-referenced original mylar, three copies of the mylar, a restrictive covenant document, and an easment document for recording with King County, and SPECIAL RECORDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR KING COUNTY. Please have CD & L Courier take these documents via 2-hour service ($2.1.40) 1:00 PM deadline to City Clerk 4-hour service ($14.60) 10:00 AM deadline to City Clerk Enclosed is a check for $14.60 payable to CD & L. According to Finance, the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings should be charged to account #000/07.590.0060.49.000014. Please call me at X-7294 if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Safeway Subaru Property Management Yellow file 1-944 qcf Larry Warren • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1999 TO: File#LUA99-089 and#LUA98-052 FROM: Laureen Nicolay SUBJECT: Finalization of Agreements with Safeway/Snyder Regarding Lake Avenue South Vacation On August 4th, Larry Warren left a message indicating that I should finalize the covenants associated with the Lot Line Adjustment, but that he would handle everything related to the amendatory ordinance and release of the City subsequent to the recording of the line adjustment. cc: Larry Warren CITN )F RENTON AIL . Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor > ` r)f Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM 00 To: Peter Rosen, Planner QFC *4,TON� I `'';le From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney S`1 998 Date: December 16, 1998 0// Subject: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Safeway Store No. 489/1563, Renton, WA I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is approved as to legal form. awrence J. Wa en LJW:as. cc: Jay Covington Sharman Braff via fax A8:152:24. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 :� This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer DEC-16-1998 12:11 WARREN, KELLOGG ET AL P.02/02 ,.},,, CITE' OF RENTON lc LILLE Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM To: Peter Rosen, Planner From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: December 16, 1998 Subject: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Safeway Store No. 489/1563, Renton, WA I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is approved as to legal form_ XLilralwence J. en LJ W:as. cc: Jay Covington Sharman Braff via fax A8:1.52:24. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 TOTAL P.02 DEC-16-1998 12: 11 WARREN, KELLOGG ET AL P.01/02 • FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WARREN, BARBER, CITY OF RENTON DEAN & FONTES, P.S. DEC 1 F 1996 ATTORNEYS AT LAW P.O_ Box 626, 100 South Second Street RECEIVEp Renton, Washington 98057-0626 (425) 255-8678 FAX NUMBER: (425) 255-5474 I.This fax contains confidential, privileged information intended only for the addressee. Do not read, copy, or disseminate it unless you are the addressee. If you have received this Fax in error,please call us (collect) immediately at(425)255-8678,and mail the original Fax to P.O.Box 626,Renton,Washington 98057. TO: PETER ROSEN, PLANNER SHARMAN BRAFF, SENIOR ATTORNEY, SAFEWAY, INC. FAX NO.: 430-7300 (925)467-3224 FROM: LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DATE: 12/16/98 RE: DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS I am enclosing the following documents: URGENT - PLEASE DELIVER TO INDIVIDUALS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!!! THANK YOU. (X)FOR YOUR INFORMATION ( )PER YOUR REQUEST ( )FOR SIGNATURE AND RETURN ()PER OUR CONVERSATION ( )FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ( )PER OUR AGREEMENT ( )FOR NECESSARY ACTION ( )SEE REMARKS BELOW ( )FOR YOUR FILES ( ) ( )FOR YOUR APPROVAL ( }APPROVED AS NOTED This transmissions consists of 2 pages,including this cover page_ If for some reason you do not receive all of the pages,or it is not legible,please contact Anne at(425)255-8678 immediately. Thank you- DEC 10 '98 14:52 FR SAFEWAY REAL EST LAW 925 467 3057 TO 912067298845 P.03/10 LV6. !JJ 1J-IJ ire• +' rmuri I RNNZNH 11UN TO 192546?3224 P.01/BB • Tran:s.n:ation T12ANSivAncor T TLE iiismitANcE COMPANY 1200 Sixth Avenue ' Suite 100- Seattle,WA 98101 206-628-4650- fax 206-467-S080 Fax To: Sharman Braff From: Sherri L. Pelletier Fax: 925-467-3224 Phone: 206-628-2795 Pages:4 8 Dote: 12J09/98 Re: CC: O Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply ❑Please Recycle • Comments: Recorded Declaration of Restrictive Covenants DEC 10 '9E 14:52 FR SAFEWAY REAL EST LAW 925 467 3057 TO 91206729E845 P.04/10 u ud 1JJD ie.1-uu rRUI'i I RHl' tyH I t.UIS StH I I Ut I`I 1y.J54673224 P.22413 • Return Address Name Clly of Renton,City Clerk Address 1055 So.Grady Way City.State,Zip Renton,WA 980SS Document TIUo(n)(or transecnons contained therein): Uect,ration of RestrinNe t',evenants Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:NJ"),cl Y 7i �y Granters) 1, Safeway.Inc.2.• TFIRANAROENRID_ RUACTE OO'Waitional names on page of document. Grentees(s) t 1, 1fi Additional nemett on page of doturner legal deacrlpdon(abbreviated:i.e.tot.block,plat or section.township,range) • t'tn Gov L.10.Tr,10&11 of Renton Snorelands 2nf Supplemental,S18,T23N,R S E. Pin,Of H.H.Tobin Ooarunfon Claim No.37,Tr 14,Renton Shorelands.2"Supp1.Maps.S18.T23N,RSE CC Pen of the F%r or SIB,T23N_RSF,W,M. Ptn of ine Henry H Tobin Donation Claim No.37.Sin,T23N.RSE,w.M, Additional legal is on Page 3.4.5 and 6 of document Astooeor's Property Tax PareelfActrount Number 182305.9071.03, 000720-01 BD-00,007204004-0S,000720-0212..03,722960.0140.00. 000720-0211-04, 000720-011947 Additional legal Is on page or document The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the Information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the aeeurecy or completeness of the Indexing information�provided herein. Washington Stare County AudjorrRecorders Indexing Form(Cover Sheet) 00'1T 9d !DO yok)3321 A101100 011I4 44 013:2E:66 tl50-110219E • Tran cation'Title • • DEC • nEC Cag 'C7A t R:GA —"me DEC 10 '98 SAFEWAY REAL EST LAW 925 467 3057 TU yl�bb'(��titf45 r.05/1✓_1 y �u icy 14t52�+�+ FR rrcul'i RHIYaiyH i uN btH I I Lb TO 19254673224 P.03/08 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: • City of Rcnton-City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Declaration of Restrictive Covenants WIlEREAS, Safeway Inc„ a Delaware corporation. is the owncr of the real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described in Exhibit A attached hereto, WHER13AS,the owner of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the abnvc- dcscribed property. NOW.THEREFOR , the aforesaid owner hereby establishes.grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use of the property by the undersigned.its successors and assigns,as follows: tod RESTRICTIvE COv aNrS 3!! 2 Use of the garbage areas, trash compactor and delivery hours shall be limited to 1' the hours between 6:00 a•m.and 10:00 p.m. 'these restrictions shall only apply to t'usca' t\I occuPying 10,000 square feet of space or more. Any violation or breach of these Restrictive Covenants may be enforced hy per legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining the subject property who arc adverselyafTeeted by said breach. SAI EWAY INC,, a Delaware Corporation Its Assis i Vic r id By: its Assi an Secretary 04S9rcrl I(I()WAS) l Remo,'WA • • ED If: Tratunatioo Title • DEC I : I: 411 DFr AQ 'can in-nc DEC 10 '98 14:53 FR SAFEIJAY REAL EST LAW 925 467 3057 TO 912067298845 P.06i10 F Q1Ji TRANSNATION SEATTLE TO 1925467322-d P.04i06 • ACKN0WLEDGMENT STATE 0F CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ) ss. On November 12. 1998, before me. Sylvia Burnett, Notary Public, personally,appeared Sharman Bruit and Jerome P. I larrison personally known to me to be the persons whose names are sulLa:ribed to the within instrument and acknuwledsed to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacity, and that by their Signatures on the instrument,the persons or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted,executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. at ( O?M1w al71'p� Q ��n7:yW-�ee.r-oe�oc.worwm �o (Am . £LAMLIDA � Signature (Seal) wconn,�r�n;ati is 2aoi - —� O O 1-+ 4) Tran ation Tide DEC I • :: DEC 89 'AA 1 Gt:m DEC 10 '98 14:53 FR SAAY REAL EST LAW 925 467 3057 TO 912067298845 P.07ii0 FEIJ t�11LL TD 19�54673?Z4 P.05i08 • PARCEL ONE: LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA•010.97., OF LOT nr.NB ADJUSTMENT SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8211239011, BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10 AND TRACTS 10 ANT) 11 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL, ALL IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M_ ; SITUATE. IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF wASHINGTON. PARCEL TWO: THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN DONATION CLAIM NO. 37, AND TRP T PORTION OF TRACT 14 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, ALL SITUATED IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST AVE. (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTHG GINSOTTUCK t. SOUTH 3RD STREET (FORMERLY 3RD AVE. ) : THENCE NORTH 89 2Ay DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN, DISTANCE OF 537.50 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; OTHENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 140.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 68 DEGREES 40 HINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 48.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE '"1 SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF LAKE STREET, ACCORDING TO SAID wU RENTON SHORE LANDS MAPS, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 57 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 254.69 FEET FOR A DISTANCE OF 1.73.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 88.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 3RD STREET, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 05 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE • rEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 129.15 FEET FOR A DISTANCE OF 10. 03 FEET: THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES SO SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OP 252,70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 40 FEET THEREOF; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. EXRIA,IT Sofeway Property • H Traosbntioe Title DEC 0 T DEC 09 '98 1@:47 DEC 10 '98 14:53 FR SAFEIJAY REAL EST LAW 925 467 3057 TO 912067296645 P.08i10 SJ1,-4eyj—iyJH ib a5 FROM TRFINSNRTION SERTTLE TO 19?5d573224 P.06i08 • • 4ARCEL THREE: THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN CLAIM NO. 37, AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT 14 OF RENTON SFIORELANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, ALL SI7VATED IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. . DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: $EGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OP THE WEST MARGIN OF SHA'ITUCK AVF.NtiE SOUTH (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND TFiE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH THIRD STREET (FORMERLY THIRD AVE.) ; THE SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN .OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE. NORTH 88 DEGREES 10 MINU^_'ES 50 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAT,D NORTH MARGIN 30Q.QQ FEET TO 2'I:F TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, 250.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, 219.46 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND •30 FEET ER (WREN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) THE WEST LINE TOFL TRACT M14 OF SAID RENTON SHORELANDS; THENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 216.34 FEET •i TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER iE PIPELINE• RIGY.T-OF•WAY; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 25 CDL7 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 30.53 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 14; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 20 MINUTES OS SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 245.74 FEET TO THE POINT 0 OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG. SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS N OF 254.69 FEET FOR A DISTANCE OF 87.46 FEET TO A POINT FROM 00 WHICH THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 57 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 28 O3 SECONDS WEST: THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST 8.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1.40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH THIRD STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST 277.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION T}IEREOF. IF ANY, LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS: • AEGINNING AT A POINT SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTE$ 00 SECONDS WEST 300.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 1E OF FLATS. PAGE 33, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST TO THE SOUTHERLY LONE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPE LINE, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. EXHIBIT "A" Safevay property • • 'hanmnstioo TiUe DEC Q : :'11.11 npr AO pQ ,a .ram DEC 10 '98 14:53 FR SAFEWAY REAL EST j AN 9 c5 4b'r 51�5'i ul u 'J1-2eb ZJbti454S?3224ey/P 07/eS PARC6L FOUR THAT PORTION OP TEE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 16, TOwNSltIp 23 NORTH, RANGE S EAST W.Pl. , DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT TEX IlrrEASECTzox OF TEE WEST MARGIN oY STA2'TUCK AVENUE (FORMERLY SHATTUCK 3TRXET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 3RD ST.I (FORMERLY 3RD AvENUE); THENcE NoRTE 88 DECREES 40 ]SrNVTEs So SEcoNs WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 300_00 FEETi TM:NCE 1TORTE 01 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST 250.00 FEET TO TEE TRUE PO/NT of BEGINNING; Tfl ICE NORTH 88 DECREES 40MIND/ES 50 SECOSOS WEST 218.36 FEET TO A POINT am A LINT RSZCS IS PARALLEL WITH AND 10 FEET EASTERLY FRo1S (RFC 1g'.AsoR D AT =GMT ANGLE TO) THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 14, RENTON SHORXLANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS; THENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 06 SEcOND9 EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 216.17 FEET TO TEE SOUTH MARGIN OF TEE CITY OF SEATTLE PIPE LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE 80= 88. DEGREES 22 =NO=5 20 SECONDS EAST AMONG SAID SOUTR MARGIN 176.94 PEST TO A POINT FO3ICH BEARS NORTH 0I DECREES 19 MINETE5 10 SEc0ND3 EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT or BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 19 1p:Np7'ES to SECONDS WEST 211.21 PEET TO TEE TRUE POINT of BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE rl DESCRIBED AS: I% N BEGINNING AT A POINT SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 00 SECONDS 2 REST 300.00 FEET more TEE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN G VOLUMS 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 33, RECORDS OF RING COUNTY; THENCE NORTE 00 DEGREES 13 )1 NOTES oo SECONDS RES? TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TEM CITY OP SFATTI.E CEDAR RIVER PIPE LINE, 3D AND THE TER.YINUS OF SAID LINE; O1 SITUATE ZN THE CITY of RENTON, COUNTY OF ZINC, STATE OF WASHINGTON. IM.1:3IT "A" Safe' y Property 1 � lJI J[: Tran$n9ti0D Title] • • DEC 0 : :;n DEC 89 '9B 10.47 DEC 10 '98 14:54 FR SAFEWAY REAL EST LAW 925 467 3057 TO 912067298045 P. 10/10 • ' DEC-09-1998 10:45 FROr TRANSNATION SEATTLE TO 1925467322.E P.08/08 • • PARCEL FIVE THAT PORTION OF THE HENRY H. TOBIN DONATION CLAIM NO. 37, IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED . AS FOLLOWS: • BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMiTHERS FIFTH AEDITION TO THE TOWN OF AEAITON, AS P£R PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 89°47'00" WEST 88 FEET TO TEE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89°47'00° WEST 112 FEET, TO A POINT HEREIN AFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A"; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89°47'00" WEST 100 FEET; • THENCE NORTH 00°13'00" WEST 461.75 FEET, MORE OR LESS. TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPE LINE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PIPE LINE TO A POINT NORTH 00013 '00" WEST FROM POINT "A"; THLICE SOUTH 00°13'00° EAST 200 FEET TO A POINT NORTK 00°13'00° WEST 254.81 FEET FROM POINT "A"; TWICE SOUTH 73°S1'15" FAST 208.44 FEET; Thravcr. SOUTH 00°13'00" EAST 76.09 FEET, TO A POINT NORTH 00°13 '00° WEST 120 FEET FROM SAID NORTHWEST PLAT CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 89°47'00" WEST 88 FEET TO A POINT NORTH 00°13'00" WEST FROM THE TRITE POINT OF BEGINNING; ThENCE SOUTH 00°13'00" EAST 120 TO THE TRUE POINT OF e, BEGINNING; y EXCEPT ANY PORTIO0 TEEREOF LYING E STERL OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVENUE (SHATTUCX STREET) ; C3 SITUATE IN THT. CITY OF R NTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 1-4 PARCEL SIX TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF VACATED LAKE AVENUE SOUTH ADJOINING, PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF RE•NTON ORDINANCE NO. 4660 RECORDED UNDER RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9611150135. • EXHIBIT "A" Safeway Property • • Traasnntion Title rsc r` '4°4 4 TOTAL P.08 OCT. 01 ' 98 1(THU) 10: 16 BAYLIB BRAND WAGNER 206 453 6013 FACE. 1:2 • • ode I3AYI .IS I IRANI.) `c WA( ;NI_h CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ARCHITECTS TO cif OF Reara) D Mall JOB NO 0 FAXRE 7 ,A„,. O Courier FILE t F n(�) �/� ATTENTION {� t USe; ❑ DATE ( I � �' ❑ Enclosed ❑ Copy of Letter 'O Prints FAX ORO ISJ 7`3 ❑ Original 0 Shop Drawing 0 Disk PAGES COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION These are transmitted as checked below A For approval ❑ As requested 0 Approval as noted ❑ Correct and re-submit ❑ For your use 0 For review and comment ❑ Approval as submitted ❑ Forwarded without review Remarks , �l,iaf/_ItV r r 1\1 jp R ofilip 113 Copy to ❑ Mall FAX - A SignedVal) E v ❑ Courier Planning • Architecture • Interiors 10801 Main Street • Bellevue,Washington 98004 FAX (425)453-8013 (425)454-0566 CCT. 01 ' 98 (THU) 10. 19 BAYLI S BRAND WAGNER 206 45B 8013 FACE. 2/2 • S. 2ND ST. IIIIIITIIiiii u,--.---- I 111 11 .E --....„...._ ii EXISTIN i FENCE ��`---..,,,` ill 0 ft I •`. —A3 FUTURE I---_ is Ii g , JZETAI� i___ as I iffi r-- 11111111111111111 Akp,q,Q _ �, I L (� I f a !1 IL I , i1 ❑ v) qmilomill ..� ' I • 1 _._,F7._0" . : F— MAIN rbc� I �l ENTt`RANGE I G.M.U. BUFFER WALL ., V. TRASHimmomil �• - COMPACTOR 1 a rIt 11 1 , [)o I 1 11 1 F I II I SAFE/NAY #156� 1 1 ) ° ``GREENING WALL , g dt) . ;_.,: / . ‘ _J : . SECONDARY r_______i ENTRANCE I % I GENE'S RESTORANTE I — $ I I I I \,__, I LJ I I ;kit -I- 4 IIiIIIIIIIII�j ,, ....._J S. 3RD ST. 51r PLAN I":(oO1 io.r. gp 6 t‘sCITA )F RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman September 28, 1998 Mr. Richard L. Wagner Baylis Brand Wagner 10801 Main Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT FILE No. LUA98-052,SA-H Dear Mr. Wagner: The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter, which was issued on July 16, 1998, was not appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the City Clerk as of this date. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, ---..k. ..---a V424,,,b.,__ Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Peter Rosen Sandi Seeger, Development Services 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY C RENTON ••+l g Hearing Examiner • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J. Kaufman August 13, 1998 Mr. Richard L. Wagner Baylis Brand Wagner 10801 Main Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Request for Reconsideration- Safeway Development LUA98-052,SA-H Dear Mr. Wagner: This office has reviewed the request for reconsideration for the above matter. You have asked that Conditions 1 and 2 be modified or eliminated. There are a number of issues raised both implicitly and explicitly by the request. This office fully understands the nature of the neighboring properties - on one hand Gene's Restaurant and on the other the apartment complex. The same impacts on business and livelihood are applicable to both the restaurant to the south and the apartment complex to the north and east. What is true for not interfering or adversely affecting Gene's business must also be applicable for the apartment's owners since, while it is residential, it is definitely a commercial venture just as deserving of protection from adverse impacts. It would appear that residential amenities such as quiet living space and plenty of light and air circulation should be a paramount interest. The arrival and departure of delivery trucks as well as their unloading along with the noise of the garbage trucks, garbage bins and recycling equipment is not acceptable this close to the residential uses. Any additional distance will help ameliorate those impacts. Therefore, the condition will not be altered. The request for reconsideration makes clear the details of what had been presumed - the new plan was to allow the current Safeway store to continue operating during the new construction. The maintenance of the old store for the temporary convenience of both Safeway and patrons is admirable, but it has clearly created a situation where Safeway's new location and design make it less successful in addressing the concerns of its residential neighbors. Clearly, from your remarks regarding Gene's Restaurant, the impacts on that business were also exacerbated by the new Safeway location. The technical details of the partial demolition and preservation do create cause for concern, although they probably could be addressed creatively in some fashion with additional planning. Any loss of productivity or inconvenience to its patrons by losing more of the old store would be short-lived, but the shadows, shading, crowding and other impacts to the apartment will be permanent, complete and irreversible. They will not end in a duration measured in months. This office believes your reading of past "tense" into the neighbors' concerns is incorrect(please see the attached verbatim extract of their testimony). The report indicates that they were "pleased" with the changes but still concerned about the proximity of the new store to their buildings and the loss of light and sun. The submission of the photographs of the garden area was intended to demonstrate this continuing concern. This office is not aware that they actually 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)235-2593 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer "withdrew" objections to the closeness. As a matter of fact,both owners closed their respective testimony with comments regarding the "alley-like" aspect that will be created by the new store's location. Also, please don't lose sight of the fact that this office found the new plan in the main more than appropriate and well-designed. That does not mean that it was perfect, but the imposition of mitigating conditions does not mean the plan was unacceptable. It is interesting how the various provisions of the Zoning Code allowing the site plan to be altered by the imposition of conditions to make a proposal more neighborly are given token deference and dismissed, whereas the same Zoning Code's setback provisions are read without any flexibility. Would the applicant's plan suffer immeasurably by moving the building or reducing the parking complement. This office understands that this was first raised at the hearing and that no one was prepared to particularly address the issue at the hearing. But nothing in the record or in the Request for Reconsideration demonstrates that irrevocable harm would be done to the proposal by reducing its parking complement. There would be fewer spaces but that would probably not irrevocably harm the development and business. The alley-like closeness of the new store to the apartments will cause irrevocable harm. Be that as it may,this office believes it would be unfair to require an appeal of this second issue. It appears that the applicant's plans were delicately balanced to favor the site plan submitted. Any alteration, as appropriate as it may seem, to make the residential amenities of the adjacent property more reasonable and provide more light and air,will create additional technical problems for Safeway. Therefore,the condition to move the building to the west will be removed. In conclusion, there is no reason to alter Condition 1 to move the loading dock to minimize its impact on a residential complex and favor a commercial enterprise that does not house residential units. That condition will remain. Condition 2 will be stricken from the decision. Since this decision results in a substantial change to the original decision, if any party wishes further reconsideration,that should be submitted to this office within 14 days of the date of this determination. In addition, an appeal may be filed with the City Council within 14 days of this decision. If this office can be of further assistance,please feel free to write. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman FJK:mm Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson, Econ. Dev. Administrator South County Journal Parties of Record Joe Lightfoot: You have mentioned already our letter of the 18th is in your file, a matter of record. Initially we were quite distressed when we saw the proposed layout. We have been aware for a long time that Safeway was planning to expand that store and so the project itself was no surprise, but the way it was laid out was quite a shock. Initially we were happy with Mr. Rosen's efforts to help us understand what was going on, and we thought that the suggestions made in the staff report were good ones. We are more than pleased now that the applicant has really responded to a good deal of our concerns. We still wish the building wasn't wrapped right around the property corner like it is, but that is where it is and apparently code allows that. They have suggested that the gate area be continued to allow access and I haven't heard anything yet to indicate there is a security problem. Hearing Examiner: No, as a matter of fact, Mr. McMillin said they would maintain the gate or a passageway between the two properties to the defined sidewalk. Mr. Lightfoot: My thought is we don't really know what this area in here is going to be. Apparently it is employee parking or some service back of a building. I am wondering if we couldn't run a continuous sidewalk around this margin here (indicating), some way to define pedestrian movement rather than simply ambling across that area. I know they presently traverse the parking lot, but people are accustomed to seeing other people with shopping carts in the parking areas and are looking for that. I am just concerned that if this is generally a service area, maybe people backing in there with trucks, are not aware of someone in that area. It would seem a simple thing to provide something in the way of a sidewalk and crosswalk, or something like that, where people are supposed to walk. In that area too we have a little trash and service area. I think the landscape architect did a nice job of attempting to screen that some with landscaping. I don't know how long it will take that landscaping to grow or whether it will effectively do the job. Oftentimes you see behind buildings a slightly fenced area or screening that would make it so the people right next door aren't just staring into a bunch of refuse and pallets and stuff like that. I don't know how you are going to light that particular area. I hope you can use lights that screen downward so that people are not looking out their windows at a bright light. The other obvious continuing concern is the alleyway affect that we are going to create on our south margin. I do like what the architect has done in the way of-- I think his proposal for screening is better than the one that came out of the staff report--just continuing that wall. I think that little setback screen like that will create a much more attractive area, and leaves us only with the problem of the high 27 foot wall abutting around that corner. (It was pointed out that the jutting area was being lowered to 17 feet and any equipment that was going to be in the second story area was going to be moved south.) I am pleased with that, so all we have left is just the balance of the bulk of that building. We have done a lot of walking around there and other stores in other areas lately in trying to evaluate all this. If that building were a little farther away, maybe 5 feet farther away, it would certainly make an awful lot of difference on the portion which is still 27 feet high. They have shown a lot of attractive landscaping and I think that's a big improvement. I don't know how much of that you can fit in a little 5 foot slot, but I am not a gardener. (Discussion regarding Factoria store equipment and noise generated from such) If that back high 27 foot high wall can be a very light color, it is going to help a great deal. It would reflect light back in and keep us from getting a tunnel-like affect back in that little slot there. That would be appreciated also. I think those are essentially all the expressions I have. Lyn Lightfoot: I was just going to try to be more specific on what my husband means by that access through the gate. I thought he had such a good idea. The gate is here (indicating). Then they could come through the gate. Right now this is a planter area, but this could be a sidewalk. (Discussion regarding sidewalk and eliminating parking row) Mrs. Lightfoot: I thought I would just tell about the people that are our clientele. We like Safeway and we would not have the clientele we have without having Safeway there, but we are a senior citizen complex and so I am concerned about their safety -- getting back and forth. What they do is sell their homes and move in. We are not a regular apartment complex; that is, what I am trying to get over is they move in forever. They stay like 8, 12 -- we have one tenant who has been there 33 years. They make it their home. On the side where the high wall is they plant gardens. (Entered photographs) One point is that an extra-- were it possible, but I know you are legal -- an extra five feet would make a world of difference. I am just trying to show you that they love their gardens. I am trying to think positively about this and I am thinking on this side behind the south building, between the two walls -- I am thinking that actually maybe it could become a private area for them, almost a patio-like area with the high wall going up and so forth and now all the plantings. I have to say that if there was just an extra five feet it would make a world of difference. The other thing is that I love what you have done with foliage and that makes a lot of difference, and the light color. It just so happens that where we live on Mercer Island, right next door to us townhouses went up and they are tall and they have off-white Drivet covering. On the one side of our house that is close to that it is like 30 to 40 feet and taller than our house, but the color is very nice and it blends with the sky. So when I look out my bedroom window--the sky is not just a straight blue, it has white clouds and so forth, it just blends right in. So, I am thinking that could make a difference, too. Of course they have projections and detail and horizontal lines and so forth which you can do some of that maybe. (Addressed concerns regarding noise of Safeway store at Factoria and it was explained that that was an old store with equipment that is no longer installed in new stores.) Another idea had been to extend the length of that sound barrier wall and we like that because it makes it more open. CM OF RENTON BAYus JUL 3 a 1998 BRAND D WAGNER RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ARCH I T E C T S July 30, 1998 City of Renton Office of the Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Attention: Mr. Fred J. Kaufman RE: Downtown Safeway JOB NO.: 96-1030 Subject: File No. LUA-98-052, SA-H — Request for Reconsideration Dear Mr. Kaufman: By this letter, we respectfully request your reconsideration of your Condition Nos. I and 2 of your decision of July 16, 1998. All other conditions of your decision are acceptable. Condition No, / states "The applicant shall alter the location of the delivery bay to move it at least five (5) additional feet from the south property line of the adjacent apartment complex. Any buffer wall that is constructed along the common property line shall step down in height as it moves eastward a sufficient distance from the trash/recycle bins." Please clarify your intent of the term "delivery bay." We assume this term is referencing the entire portion of the building into which the trucks back, and is not referring simply to the south wall of the trucking bays. We request that you reconsider this condition based on conversations we have had with Gene and Jong Sens, owners of our eastern neighbor, Gene's Restaurant. They have been quite concerned as to the impacts of the proposal on their livelihood. To accommodate them, we held the building and the loading docks as far away from their restaurant as possible. Because of our efforts to address their concerns, they did not attend the hearing, and did not make themselves party of record. In your reconsideration of Condition No. 1 , we thought you should have this information. Condition No. 2 states "The applicant shall move the building footprint between 5 to 9 feet west to provide that much additional setback east of the building. The applicant may create additional parking stalls, if necessary, in surplus landscaping areas or in the enlarged eastern setback." ASSOCIATES Kent Pearse,AIA PRINCIPALS Planning • Architecture • Interiors Mitch Yockey,AlA El Baylis,AIA Johan Luchsinger,AIA Brian Brand,AIA 10801 Main Street • Bellevue,Washington 98004 Susan Christofides,SDA Richard L.Wagner,AIA FAX (425) 453-8013 Robert B.Reed,AIA Thomas Frye,Jr.,AIA (425) 454-0566 Guy Peckham,AIA City of Renton/ F.J. Kaufman July 30, 1998 Page 2 This condition is unnecessarily onerous, not supported by the evidence or the testimony, and creates a solution that is less desirable than the perceived problem. Further, the condition appears to be based on Finding 27 and Conclusions 4 and 8, all of which do not accurately portray the whole situation. All of this might simply be the result of our office not completely elaborating on the whole situation because we had thought we had addressed the issues to your satisfaction. However, clearly more information would be helpful. Showing the building 5 feet to 9 feet west has a much larger impact than what is apparent. You are correct in noting that the 5 feet to 9 feet shift of the building will lose approximately 18 stalls. However, your Conclusion 8 states that some parking may be gained on the east side. In fact, because of the operations of the trucks, no stalls will be gained on the east, thus all 18 stalls will be lost. Your Conclusion 8 infers that the loss of approximately 18 stalls is of little consequence when compared to the total number, and when compared to the minimum number required by the City. The City adopted this minimum parking standard to assure that a user provides at least this number, and not shift its auto impacts off its site and into the neighborhood. There is no record that the minimum was ever intended as a tool to reduce the required. That is the role of the maximum parking standard. It is important to note that the food store industry does not consider 4 stalls per 1 ,000 GSF as viable in lower density, auto-oriented communities. Your conclusions do not properly recognize that the proposed Safeway abuts the west property line of the apartments for a length of only 55 feet. The total length of the property line is approximately 267 feet. For the length over 55 feet, we are holding the retail buildings 55 feet to 85 feet away from the property lines. Further, neither your Findings or Conclusions recognize that the required setback for the proposed Safeway to this property line is zero. The applicant recognized that using this setback was not the right way to be a good neighbor or a good corporate citizen, and proposed, as a part of the original application, a 7 foot setback. As a final note regarding the impacts on our neighbor, you should highlight in Finding 27 that the owners of the apartment "were" concerned (note the tense), and as a result of their concern, the applicant proposed four substantial additional mitigation measures. Although these were noted in the minutes, the owners' full response, which was given toward the end of the hearing, was not recorded in the minutes, nor was it included in the Findings. In fact, the owners stated that they were pleased with the additionally proposed mitigations and they withdrew their objections. Beyond the site planning issues, there is also a practical issue for not increasing the easterly setbacks. That issue is the impacts on the existing Safeway store. Safeway does not want to closet its existing facility during the construction of the new. Downtown Renton has no other food store in its Central Business District, so demolishing the existing store prior to the new facility being opened would have a large detrimental effect on the neighborhood. Therefore, Safeway challenged us to develop a phasing plan that allows the existing facility to be demolished after the new one is complete. This has been a challenge because the southeast corner of the existing overlaps the northwest corner of the new by approximately City of Renton/ F.J. Kaufman July 30, 1998 Page 3 50 feet! To better visualize the specific impacts of this challenge, we have prepared two sketches for your use and record. The first shows the impacts as they would occur in the applicant's proposal, as is titled "As Is." The second shows the impacts as they would occur with the building moved west 5 feet, and is titled "Moved 5 Feet." The existing store has a structural roof system of joists supported by beams and columns, laid out on the grid lines noted as "A" through "E". This grid line, as any Engineer or Contractor will attest, defines the reasonable limits of demolition. If the required limit of demolition gets too close to a grid line or moves beyond a grid line, then the structural frame will need to be demolished all the way to the next grid line to avoid any unreasonable shoring. To keep the store open and reasonably productive for the neighborhood, the demolished area must be contained to as minimal a space as possible. When realizing that the sales floor only extends to Grid Line "D" (beyond which is the stockroom), one can see that in the "As Is" condition, the loss of sales floor equals approximately 25 percent. Note that the columns, footings, and roof will be demolished to Grid Line "B"; the hatched area beyond "B" is the Contractor's working area which will underlap the remaining roof beyond "B" to the temporary partition. If the building is moved west even the minimum 5 feet required by Condition 2, the sales floor is reduced by almost 40 percent. As one can see in the "Moved 5 Feet" sketch, even if the building is moved west by one I foot, the column footings along Grid Line "B" will be undermined. Thus, the entire roof to Grid Line "C" will be lost. These practical issues are highlighted so that you can see that moving the building 5 to 9 feet west DOES have a major impact on this project. Conclusions Based on this elaboration of the impacts of Condition Nos. I and 2, and the clarification of the Findings and Conclusions, we respectfully request that you reconsider and withdraw Condition Nos. I and 2 in total. All other conditions are not protested. Sincerely, BA RAND WAGNER ARCHITECTS, INC. Ri hard L. Wagner, AI Enclosures (2) RLW:amp BUILDING POSITION AS IS - PHASING PLAN . ii // M I'IL�•i J In IW\•WV.IIV WIWIIVJ. 6. COORDINATE ALL REG111RED TEMPORARY BRACING AT NEW t EXISTING ii �� CONSTRUCTION. ittr-\ > g�/v E� / I I. REFERENCE CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL / I INFORMATION. r I / 1 EXISTING PARKING I EXISTING CONFIGURATION TO REMAIN I I ' II 0 O REMAIN INPHASE / ' I //X /;///////7/K /0I I , / - I i - r ! ' REM AIN FIRE S TOI / / I REMAIN IN PHASE E II 1 I 6T5IDE _OF I E BUILDIN65 I I > A _ / i NOT A PART ex15nN6 I I �F�UTURE ///: / I ZONE: GR I ' SAFEWAY! I . / I ..1�I I TAII EXISTINGE PPOWEReWAY x/ to BE DEMOLISHED GOMPI-Ere I ASE 2 qP ST/NG IN �' o- 1 XISTING STEEL COL, .AND I �''�' , ._ TRA5H V� II STRIPING FII6URAnOf 51EVE F10NN - r CART Mf NT B��G. ' GIRDER LINESMI �� // I I SPLICE•:•X I� %1. ��/ • / I 1 �XISTIN'S C'°1- IN ..Z4rr w DNA 5'LOG - S I ' Q— r P.Ve�iooi0000=0i=ANS •Pat& ii PORTION OF EXISTING ►•s•iTi-�.��.��.-rc ►.o.►........►..t I SAFEWAY TO BE 1 ..♦�........;-... DEMOLISHED IN PHASE I 0 P�F.y.o.•.000Q►000i EXISTING COLUMN-- RAN�.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.4►�.4� EXISTING AR TM i�A N,��••••••••••••••••••�r•� ENTRANCE EN T o - + f ►:�•::'�❖�•..•O:•�':'�' - BCD ►..►.►..........I a ♦..�........�:�� TEMPORARY TELE c. PROVIDE TEMPORARY ►•.iu.•i��Oi�D.O�i�i�i PHONE CONDUIT EXTERIOR PARTITION ►.A. ►N...... I Q VAS'►••.•••O••.•.�•�.� EXIST.TELEPHONE SEW 6'FIRE EXIT rm BE ►.•.A. �.❖.•.A.•.A.A.� SERVICE-- �` INSTALLED IN FHASE I r0 ►••oA.1•ooA000000�t PHASE I: NEW STORE SLAB t T I 1 ►i o t•i.N•i-�! 4 OVER EXISTING VAULT tILGONDUIT. I 1 ENTRANCE , \ b I I EXIST.ELECTRICAL DOWNCAST I PROPOSED VAULT-- \/ i SSESTANDARD, PHASE I: NEW STORE SLAB t NI SAFEWAY FOUNDATION WILL BE BUILT U 2 TO BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND EXISTING VAULT. IN PHASE I > LOADING BAY I ..... ar l ,._., 26 Al NEW GONG.WALK- TO END AT PILASTER EDGE EXI5ITIN6 BUILDING TO rtitg (,...- Q BE DEMOLISHED IN PNA5E I ill ry 26 z -4 - I ,_r_r.a,,^ ^ O V BUILDING POSITION MOVED 5 FT. - PHASING PLAN • // G \\\ \\Xi s �J / � '1. REFERENCE CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL II I INFORMATION. / I EXISTING PARKING I - -- - - - - - 0 CONFIGURATION TO REMAIN I EXISTING EWTRAN{GE I 1 PTO REMAININ I ' Q I �� • . • //I /// ' //Ai//0 I I / -- • - - - I v I ' EXISTING FIRE EXIT TO / I REMAIN IN PHA5E EXIT, i I I I FACE OF I ivrun IDEBUILDINGS 1 I > >I / I a 1 1 / I NOT A PART / JC I I I ZONE: OR ��`CC`-'X�', A FUTURE J4; ZT - - -L - - - 5HTING o- - - - b¢LLAMMGIRDER'LLIIIN�ES 1 B4'-5' .4 -. RYTR`` NW /Z / I CONFIGURATIONONSHOWN NT e(Dr / / • • I viz ocin: .-_� wl, (/ O- - tt **�r♦�• L ♦r♦ ♦qii` y — I • PORTION OF EXISTING ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦-4:0 ♦�*: SAFEWAY TO Et ♦♦�♦♦♦♦�♦�♦�♦♦♦�♦♦�4,♦� I ! e DEMOLISHED IN PHASE I 11‘♦♦♦� ♦♦♦t`♦♦♦♦♦�♦ 1 XIv ♦♦ ♦♦♦• �♦♦♦♦♦♦�! EXISTING j AR o EXISTING GOLUNM ;♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�j!♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦;♦�I�♦!♦�♦,♦♦:♦�♦♦♦/;��;�♦<EN'RA"-E j T MEIV T h. / PROVIDE TEMPORARY ♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦f! ♦♦♦♦♦♦�TEMPORARY TELE r I EXTERIOR TEMPORARY - -•♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦4�♦♦♦♦♦♦ PHONE CONDUIT j ♦♦ ♦♦�:♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� EXIST.TELEPHONE ' INFS b'F11H��C CXI TO BE ♦♦♦ , ♦♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦` SERVICE-- \ ' 5E I ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ PHASE I� NEW STORE SLAB t �♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� FOUNDATION WILL BE BUILT ��♦i�t.��i�♦��* POSED�� OVER EXIsnNS VAULT$CONDUIT. O J — MP1P05ED `/ I DOWNCAST{{(.6 BdTRANGE EXIST,ELECTRICAL • ( TANDARD 11Y PROPOSED VAULT- PHASE I: NEW STORE SLAB 1 ` ` • \ (.�� , SAFEWAY FOUNDATION WILL BE BUILT TO BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND EXISTING VAULT. � ` IN PHASE I O�IN6 3�Y 1 .� • 4 « 26✓ NEW GONG.WALK- TO END AT PILASTER EDGE �l EXISITIM6 BUILDING TO ,et ;Ei Q I BE DEMOLISHED IN PHASE I all 1MM k 3 n 26 111 ` 'W ASPHALT AND O i V 1.v",..-L,Pr 14--`TIC, •, I AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 16th day of July ,1998, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: C' 2 y%n CSC SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this Ife-U1 day of d " , 1998. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at , therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Safeway Development LUA98-052,SA-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. AFFinAviT OF PUBLICATION Kristina J. Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL the DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H publication newspaper er of general and is now and has been for more than six months Environmental review for proposed rede- velopment of the existing Safeway shop- prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language ping center. Location: 203 South Second continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Street. Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the The 15 day comment and appeal period State of Washington for King County. for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County end at 5:00 PM, June 22, 1998. Written Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers comments shall be forwarded to the during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Development Services Division Land UseReview Supervisor. Information on the pro- ject file and the mitigation measures LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services as published on: 6/8/98 Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- 2550. Appeal procedures are available in The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$54.09 the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal Legal Number 4756 Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 30, 1998 at 9:00 AM Le al Clerk, ouch Count Journal to consider the Site Approval. If the g y Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this pub- lic hearing. Interested parties are invited to Subscribed and sworn before me on this 1of—to day , 19 attend the public hearing. Published in the South County Journal ` „ June 8,1998.4756 _al? ___ ��0%`N►'1'''!'r►rr�,„ '(C,(b',t,)l��—r� tVY'/�JI� N�••••>0 J 4'•�-/�;,,,1- Notary Public of the State of Washington Q- v,3Tnt ` ' 0= residing in Renton = King County, Washington i • "V:,,L', cs Z. . \ July 16, 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H LOCATION: 203 South 2nd Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To replace existing Safeway Shopping Center with 56,300 square foot Safeway store and 10,275 square feet of attached retail space. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on June 24, 1998. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the June 30, 1998 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,June 30, 1998,at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Vicinity map application, proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No. 4: Landscape plan Exhibit No.5: Elevation drawing Exhibit No.6: Alternate site plan Exhibit No.7: Drawing of juxtaposition of Safeway Exhibit No. al Five photographs of apartments buildi ng to adjacent apartment buildings Baylis Brand Wagner Architect,, Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 2 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant requests site plan approval to construct a new Safeway store which would be approximately 56,300 square feet and adjacent retail space of approximately four or five stores totaling approximately 10,275 square feet. The building is located on the eastern portion of the site at 203 South 2nd Street in downtown Renton. That orientation is for visual exposure to Rainier Avenue on the west and to accommodate the large parking area. The site is uniquely located in that it is adjacent to the Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation which is the core of downtown Renton,but it is located within the Commercial Arterial zone and therefore has access and exposure to Rainier Avenue, a major arterial. There are four existing retail buildings on the site which would be demolished for this proposal. Lake Avenue which runs through this site has been vacated. The driveway off Rainier Avenue would be shared with Wendy's restaurant. There would also be two entrances off South 2nd, two driveways off South 3rd Avenue,and a truck loading entrance off Shattuck Avenue S. The project includes 328 parking spaces in the large lot in front. The Seattle Public Utilities right-of-way for the Cedar River pipeline,which is along the very north boundary of the site, is approximately 66 feet wide. Any work in that location, including landscaping and excavation would require approval of Seattle Public Utilities. This proposal went through the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)and on June 6, 1998,was issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). The two mitigation measures imposed were for fire and traffic mitigation fees. The site is designated within the Employment Area-Commercial of the Comprehensive Plan. This designation is intended for uses that require a large amount of land and high visibility and access to automobile traffic. The orientation of the building towards Rainier Avenue is appropriate given the arterial connection that characterizes the land use designation. The proposed building provides good pedestrian access from South 2nd and 3rd Avenues and the design of the building includes details of windows and building articulation and landscaping which responds to the pedestrian environment for downtown Renton. There is a policy that does address mitigating impacts on surrounding uses. The apartments adjacent on the east are within the Commercial Arterial(CA)zone also. The Council presently has a moratorium on multi-family development in the CA zones and is likely to be changing the zone to not allow new multi-family development in the that zone which would make the apartments a legal non-conforming use. The CA zone allows food and groceries as primary permitted uses. The zone also allows a wide range of other commercial,retail and service uses that would apply to the adjacent retail shops. This zone requires a minimum 10 foot front street building setback. The proposed building is set back 10 feet from South 3rd Street and quite a bit more along South 2nd Street. There are no rear or side interior setbacks required in this zone. The proposal includes a 5 foot setback from the rear property line. That is one of the considerations in terms of the adjacent apartments to the east. The zoning code allows a maximum building height of 50 feet and the maximum height of the front facade of the proposed building would be 36 feet. The site is directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway and building heights are restricted to 69 feet to avoid penetration of reserve air space surfaces. The proposed building height meets the airport height restriction. The maximum allowable lot coverage is 65 percent and the proposal would result in approximately 25 percent building coverage. The code requires a minimum of 266 or maximum of 333 parking spaces. The proposal provides 328 parking spaces. The required landscape frontage along the streets is being provided. The landscape frontage along Sound 2nd Street is within the Seattle Public Utilities pipeline corridor,and the landscape plan shows it to be well planted. It presently is planted with street trees as well as other vegetation. The plan shows retaining the street trees and adding other shrubs,particularly at the entries. The parking code requires large Baylis Brand Wagner Architect, Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 3 parking lots over 10,000 square feet to have a minimum 5 percent interior parking lot landscaping and applicant is providing approximately 8,000 square feet. The code also requires pedestrian connections between the public entrance and the street,and this proposal meets those requirements. Regarding mitigation to surrounding uses,the back of the building would be approximately 17 feet from the existing apartments which are in two buildings to the east of the site. The elevation drawing indicates the proposed building would be approximately the same height as the apartment buildings, so it would end up blocking south light exposure and views from the apartments,particularly from the southern building. The proposal does meet the code setback standards. The ERC considered this issue and did not consider it to be a significant environmental impact and did not impose mitigation measures dealing with that. The truck loading and trash area on the east side of the building are adjacent to the apartments as well as to the restaurant on South 3rd and Shattuck. The applicant proposed a screened wall jutting out from the edge of the building,and the ERC recommended a condition that the applicant extend that screened wall for the full length of the property boundary to help mitigate the noise and visual impacts of the truck loading and trash area. The plan does include some landscape buffers attempting to address the impact, including a photinia hedge along the back side of the building. The truck loading is well landscaped from view from South 3rd Avenue. Staff is also recommending a condition that the applicant extend the screened wall to better enclose the trash compactor area,and also to limit the hours of truck loading to daytime hours. Other mechanical equipment would be located inside the building and would not result in noise impacts. The building meets the height and setback requirements of the code and there would be adequate light and air to the proposed store,but the proposed building would shade the adjacent apartment building. Although this proposal and the apartments are not located in the Center Downtown designation,they border on that and the CP policies and the zoning code policies encourage a mix of commercial and residential uses to be developed at a high level of urban intensity. With the adoption of those policies and zoning,there was a presumption that there would be impacts associated with locating commercial and residential uses in close proximity. The operation of the shopping center is not expected to create harmful or unhealthy conditions. The proposal would redevelop the existing shopping center,thereby improving facilities on the site and contributing toward the redevelopment of the area. There are adequate utilities and roads available to serve the proposal, and Police and Fire have indicated there are adequate resources available to serve the proposed uses. Seattle Public Utilities' main concern is ground penetration of landscape tree rooting and any extension of utilities and excavation that could threaten the pipeline,as well as not allowing permanent structures if they needed access to the property for emergency repairs of the pipeline. The existing Safeway has a use permit for the driveway access onto the site. In conversations with Seattle Public Utilities,they did not see a problem with continuing that permit for access and for use of parking. Because there is no agreement with Seattle Public Utilities at this time,the applicant has prepared an alternate site plan which shows no use of the pipeline corridor. That would result in a loss of 16 parking spaces,which still leaves 312 spaces. If all driveway access off 2nd Avenue was eliminated,there would be problems with the Fire Department because they would need emergency access; but Seattle Public Utilities did not indicate they would have a problem with extending the use permit for the driveway access. Staff would recommend approval of the proposed development with the following conditions: (1)compliance with the ERC mitigation measures; (2)mitigation of noise impacts associated with truck loading and the trash compactor area by extending the screen wall,enclosing the trash compactor area,and recording a restrictive Baylis Brand Wagner Architect,. Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 4 covenant limiting truck loading activities to daytime hours. These measures would be subject to approval of Development Services Division prior to building permits. The applicant should also revise the site plan to maintain the pedestrian access to the adjacent apartments unless the applicant can effectively demonstrate that this connection would substantially interfere with operations or security of the shopping center. Richard Wagner, 10801 Main Street, Suite 110,Bellevue, Washington 98004,applicant representative, introduced Michael McMillin,project architect for Safeway development,and Mitch Johnson, Safeway design manager. Michael McMillin, 10801 Main Street, Suite 110,Bellevue,Washington 98004,project architect, stated that one of their main concerns was the overall height of the walls that immediately abut the adjacent apartment complex. Of most concern was that portion of the building that projects furthest east,mainly over the loading dock area. The loading dock wall in the elbow-shaped area of the building has been reduced from approximately 27 feet to 17 feet in height. In the process the mechanical room has been moved to the southern portion of the building,further away from the apartments. If there was any noise generated from the housed compressors within that room, it would be further away. The other measure taken in trying to break up the overall mass and sheer volume of the wall is introducing a combination of trellis elements and columnar trees along those two walls that face the apartments that will hopefully create a soft and pleasing backdrop. Regarding the trash compactor area,applicant is proposing a concrete masonry unit wall in a stepped wall that surrounds and encompasses the area and pulls it away from the property line more than previously indicated to allow for more vegetation and landscaping. Regarding delivery times,the applicant would recommend deliveries allowed between 6:00 a.m.and 10:00 p.m. Safeway typically delivers once a day and their trucks do not have back-up beepers so they have a fairly minimal noise impact. The applicant will incorporate the existing access from the apartment complex with its gate to the parking area in a defined walk-way route leading to the sidewalk area. Joe Lightfoot,3330 Island Crest Way,Mercer Island, Washington 98040,owner of adjacent apartment buildings, stated that initially they were quite distressed when they saw the proposed layout;however,they are now pleased that the applicant has responded to a good deal of their concerns. Regarding the pedestrian walkway from the apartment gate,he suggested a defined walkway for safety of the residents in crossing this area. He also requested that the trash area be fenced or screened at the time of construction,rather than waiting for the landscaping to cover it. Another concern is the alley-way affect on their south wall,and suggested that if the building was moved even another five feet, it would make a difference. Lyn Lightfoot,3330 Island Crest Way,Mercer Island, Washington 98040,owner of adjacent apartment buildings, also expressed concern regarding the gate access and the linking crossing through the parking area to the sidewalk. She stated that the apartment residents were senior citizens and tended to live at the complex for many years,one for as long as 33 years. Mrs.Lightfoot presented a series of photographs showing the gardens that the tenants had planted along the southwestern edge of the complex. This area would be the most impacted by the adjacent high wall of the proposed building. Mitch Johnson,Design Manager, Safeway Inc.,P.O.Box 85001,Bellevue,Washington 98005-8501, in response to moving the building another five feet, stated that it has taken over 6-1/2 years to assemble the Baylis Brand Wagner Architecw Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 5 property and work with the adjacent commercial property owners. To change the parking counts substantially would delay the project indefinitely. He stated that they originally had the building up to the property line,but moved it 5 feet away and lowered the building at the loading dock to 17 feet as a gesture in the mitigation. They have also moved all the mechanical equipment to the 3rd Avenue side. Neil Watts.Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055, stated that the pipes in the Seattle Public Utilities right-of-way are fairly shallow, in the 5 to 8 foot range, and make the crossings difficult. Storm drainage facilities will be part of the project, including water quality treatment,that discharges to the southwest of the site. The driveway plans have been reviewed, and while there are some concerns with the driveway operations through Wendy's Restaurant,they have all been approved. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:20 a.m. FINDINGS.CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Kevin Barber,for Safeway,Inc.,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a new Safeway supermarket to replace the existing store in downtown Renton. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 203 S 2nd Street. The site is bounded by S 2nd Street on the north and S 3rd Street on the south. It is located between(but does not front on)Rainier Avenue S on the west and S Shattuck Street on the east. 6. The subject site is a 6 acre,263,900 square foot parcel. The parcel is quite irregularly shaped but is approximately 525 feet wide(north to south)by approximately 480 feet long(east to west). A large notch is missing in the northwest corner of the site and an irregular dogleg extends east,wrapping around an existing apartment complex located along S 2nd Street. 7. The existing parcel is flat. An existing Safeway store and three other retail pads currently occupy the western portion of the site. These sites currently total approximately 44,214 square feet of retail space. 8. The applicant proposes redeveloping the site with a new Safeway store attached to additional retail space. The new Safeway will be approximately 56,300 square feet. The additional retail space will be approximately 10,275 additional square feet. The new development will be located along the eastern portion of the site. Baylis Brand Wagner Architecis Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 6 9. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinances 156 910 enacted in May 1909 and August 1931,respectively. 10. The subject site is classified at CA(Commercial Arterial),a designation it received with the adoption of Ordinance 4405 enacted in June 1993. 11. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating commercial uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 12. The area contains a mix of uses including Renton High School campus across S 2nd north of the site,a variety of retail and commercial uses west, south and east of the site. As noted,an apartment building is located north and east of the site in a crook created by the subject site's dogleg. 13. The zoning in the area reflects many of these uses. The high school is zoned CD(Central Downtown) with a"P"suffix reflecting the public ownership. The site and property north, east,west and south of the site are zoned CA(Commercial Arterial). The apartment complex is likewise zoned CA. Much of the rest of downtown is zoned CD like the high school. 14. The main Safeway west facade is approximately 285 feet in length. The other front facades are approximately 135 feet,providing a combined facade of approximately 420 feet. The store will be approximately 190 feet deep,although the east or rear of the store has a number of irregularities as it follows the parcel's dogleg in this area. 15. Access will be via a series of driveways. There will be two general access driveways along S 2nd(with approval of Seattle Public Utilities)and another two along S 3rd. The applicant has arranged for a shared driveway with Wendy's from Rainier Avenue. The applicant will be providing a service access driveway for truck deliveries that enters from Shattuck Avenue S and exits back onto S 3rd. 16. The applicant proposes providing 328 parking stalls. The code provides a range. The required parking ranges from 4 to 5 parking stalls per gross leaseable space. The total complex will be 66,575 square feet requiring between 266 to 333 stalls. As noted,the applicant has proposed 328 stalls or 62 stalls more than the minimum required. The majority of the parking will be located west of the retail complex between 2nd and 3rd and rear of the separate shops along Rainier. There will also be spaces located north and east of the retail shops located at the northern end of the complex. There are some potential,uncounted stalls near the delivery bays. 17. The delivery bay and trash compactor will be located on the east side of the building. 18. The Seattle Cedar River pipeline runs along the north edge of the site,between S 2nd and the site. The right-of-way is 66 feet. Access across it is by easement. Any use, including access, landscaping or parking is solely by permission of the utility. The pipeline is considered shallow in this area and deep rooted landscaping could present problems. 19. The applicant proposes orienting the store toward Rainier Avenue S,although the facade will be approximately 540 feet from Rainier. It is also separated from Rainier by a series of existing commercial uses including the Wendy's restaurant with which it will share a driveway to Rainier. Baylis Brand Wagner Architecis Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 7 20. The front or west facade will be articulated and detailed with columns,windows,accent details and a modulating roofline. A variety of materials including brick, stucco and concrete will be used to give definition and depth to the building. A covered canopy will provide weather protection as well as additional architectural detail. 21. The highest point of the facade will be 36 feet whereas the CA zone would allow a 50 foot tall building. The building is located below the centerline of Renton Municipal Airport. It complies with the Airport reserved airspace which is 69 feet in this location. 22. The south facade,the one located closest to the S 3rd Street,will be finished in similar fashion to the building front, including windows,columns and brick work so that a blank wall will not greet travelers and pedestrians along that right-of-way. Details of the north elevation are not as defined as the potential tenants are not identified. In addition,this facade is set back approximately 100 from the street. Landscaping and parking will be placed in this setback depending on Seattle's pipeline determinations. 23. The rear or east facade will be the most limited in detail. It will be articulated in a fashion as the building extends towards Shattuck Avenue into the dogleg portion of the parcel. This will be the area where the delivery bay will project east from the store and where the trash and compactor will be located for garbage pickup. 24. The apartment complex is nestled into the jog of the east or north property line where it jogs toward Shattuck. The apartment complex consists of two buildings that are set at an angle. The southernmost building is located approximately 10 feet from the property line. The Safeway rear facade would be approximately 5'2"providing a separation of approximately 15 to 17 feet. 25. The use requires a minimum of 10 feet landscaping along both S 2nd and S 3rd Streets. As noted,the Seattle pipeline intervenes between the subject site and S 2nd. All plantings in that area are subject to their approval. Parks has requested an alteration of the street trees in this area. If removal of such trees will prevent their replacement,removal should be predicated on a full analysis and should not be undertaken lightly. 26. In addition,the applicant will be providing approximately 7,000 feet of landscaping in and around the parking lot as required to meet the minimum requirement of 5% interior landscaping for large parking lots. 27. The apartment complex adjacent to the site serves mainly senior citizens. The owners of the complex were concerned about the closeness of the new building's rear walls to the complex and the limited setback between the high rear of the store and the complex. They are concerned about shadows, limited air passage and the aesthetics of facing a rather tall,blank wall. There was also concern raised regarding the compressor,refrigeration and heating,cooling and ventilation equipment generating noise in this location. Residents have a garden established along the southwest margin of the apartment complex. The apartment currently has access to the site through the existing parking lot and a gate. 28. Staff had recommended that a proposed screen wall that extended from the rear of the store,between the store and the apartment complex,be extended to nearly the Shattuck property line. This wall was initially long enough to screen off the dumpster and trash compactor area and the delivery bays. It was also as tall as the store,approximately 30 feet. Baylis Brand Wagner Architecis Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 8 29. In response to concerns,the applicant has altered the rear facade. The screening wall has been shortened to approximately 17 feet as has the roof over the rear of the loading bay. Plantings of photinia have been proposed and noisy equipment has been moved to the southeast corner of the store, away from the apartments. The applicant also proposed providing a trellis system hanging on the rear to break up the blank wall space. 30. Staff has some reservations about creating the new driveway from the subject site through Wendy's to Rainier Avenue. It will create a shortcut or bypass which may lead to too many people bypassing the signal-controlled intersections. Staff believes it will be acceptable. 31. Staff would have preferred a large truck delivery and garbage pickup pattern which did not involve the turning movements on Shattuck,but the solution appears acceptable. Manuevering will occur within the confines of the site once turning off of Shattuck. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance,part of the Zoning Code,provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance although some of its impacts on adjacent properties could be further minimized by some alterations. 2. In addition to the specific criteria the Site Plan Ordinance notes that strict compliance with all of the criteria is not needed but further suggests that conditions and alterations of a proposed site plan can be appropriate. The following sections,all from the Site Plan Ordinance,are applicable to the discussion (citations omitted): Site planning is the horizontal and vertical arrangement of these elements so as to be compatible with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding area. Site plan review does not include design review,which addresses the aesthetic considerations of architectural style,exterior treatment and colors. Site plan review should occur at an early stage in the development of a project,when the scale, intensity and layout of a project are known,but Baylis Brand Wagner Architecw Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 9 before final building plans are completed. The intent of site plan approval shall be: 1. To protect neighboring owners and uses by assuring that reasonable provisions have been made for such matters as sound and sight buffers, light and air,and those other aspects of site plans which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses; 2. To promote the orderliness of community growth,protect and enhance property values and minimize discordant and undesirable impacts of development both on and off-site; 6. To minimize conflicts that might otherwise be created by a mix of uses within allowed zones; 10. To supplement other land use regulations by addressing site plan elements not adequately covered elsewhere in the City Code and to avoid violation of the purpose and intent of those codes. 3. Mitigation Of Impacts To Surrounding Properties And Uses: a. Mitigation of undesirable impacts of proposed structures and site layouts that could impair the use or enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures and of the community; b. Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size,bulk,height, and intensity,or site layout is permitted that violates the spirit and/or intent of the Zoning Code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties; 4. The Hearing Examiner shall have the power to place reasonable conditions on or modify a site plan in order to satisfy the general purposes of this Section and to achieve consistency with the review criteria. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. Such conditions or modifications may include,but are not limited to, screening,buffering, building location and orientation,paving, landscaping,vegetation removal,grading and contouring. The Hearing Examiner shall also have the power to fix the location and configuration of driveways, walkways,parking and loading areas,emergency access,curbs, planting areas,and signs. When only a portion of a site is proposed for development, such power to condition,modify or fix shall be exercised only for that area which is directly related to or may be impacted by * the actual proposed development. 6. The authority to condition or deny site plan applications should be exercised to the minimum extent necessary to protect the public Baylis Brand Wagner Architect, Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 10 interest and welfare as expressed in the purposes of this Section. (Ord. 3981, 4-7-86) 3. A complex such as proposed which includes the large Safeway store and associated retail pads is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan's designation for the subject site. A retail complex located adjacent to a series of major arterials is certainly envisioned by the policies and goals that would favor establishing employment generating uses that also serve the residents of the City. This does not mean that this exact configuration is compatible with some of the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan or even the intent of the Site Plan Ordinance. In particular,while the applicant made some impressive modifications to the Site Plan, it still unfavorably affects the adjacent residential uses to its north and east. There is a sense of crowding,but more than that,the most unfavorable aspects of the proposed complex are located almost as close as they can be to the residential use. 4. Clearly,reorienting the complex from facing east to facing west has many benefits but it clearly has one big detriment. It focuses the delivery trucks,the loading bay and the garbage complex adjacent to an apartment complex. While the current comings and goings of the parking lot might be disturbing to the residents,the trade-off has been the relative abundance of light and air that can reach the apartments over the parking area. The current proposal will really tend to hem then in by attempting to buffer these deleterious aspects with a wall that will severely interfere with light and air circulation. An open atmosphere will be henceforth turned into a rather narrow alley. Limited sun,particularly during the shorter daylight months will enter the apartment complex from the south and west--the severest blockage directions when it comes to sunshine. 5. The proposal appears to meet all of the clear-cut setbacks found in the rest of the Zoning Code. Again, it does not provide compatibility with the following sections of the Zoning Code: 1. To protect neighboring owners and uses by assuring that reasonable provisions have been made for such matters as sound and sight buffers, light and air,and those other aspects of site plans which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses; 2. To promote the orderliness of community growth,protect and enhance property values and minimize discordant and undesirable impacts of development both on and off-site; 6. To minimize conflicts that might otherwise be created by a mix of uses within allowed zones; There is no doubt that both the apartment complex and the shopping center are permitted in the same zone. Any reference to a moratorium is,at least,momentarily misplaced. The apartment complex is an existing legal conforming use. Even if the CA zone is changed(and it has not been changed at this time) the apartment complex will still be a legal use although it could become legally non-conforming. It seems appropriate then to give it some protections. At the same time, if the City chooses to consider this apartment complex to be in transition,then burdening them is appropriate as it would accelerate their replacement with something more suitable for the CA Zone. 6. There are certainly reasons to move the current focus of the store. While staff provides justifications for moving the store as far east as possible to allow orientation of the front toward Rainier and to allow adequate parking in front of the store,and demonstrates that Commercial Arterial zoning permits such juxtapositions, it seems appropriate to honor existing uses and to not unnecessarily crowd them. While Baylis Brand Wagner Architecia Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 11 the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan suggests that intense uses be located in areas designated for Employment Commercial, it also indicates sensitivity to surrounding uses. The adoption of Comprehensive Plan policies does not specifically study the nuances of each specific land use juxtaposition when an area is designated for a particular use. Even the adoption of a zoning category such as CA in this instance,does not negate those provisions of the Zoning Code such as Site Plan review which reference impacts on adjacent properties. While the code does not provide special setbacks between adjacent uses in the CA zone,the Site Plan review process is intended to review such juxtapositions. Admittedly it contains a number of general obligations for review and does not require any particular strict compliance,but if there were to be no flex based on these various criteria,there would be little meaning to such review. There would be little reason for public input. 7. There is no question that after the initial submission and after reading of the neighboring concerns,that the applicant and City proposed a number of adjustments to make the project a better neighbor. The City proposed lengthening the wall to separate the apartment from the new delivery driveway off of Shattuck that passes in front of the apartment complex. The applicant raised and lowered the separating wall,moved the compressor equipment away from the apartment area and added landscaping and visual elements. These elements will provide some measure of relief. 8. Perhaps if the building footprint was moved to the west the width of a parking stall, it would provide more generous setback while eliminating possibly 18 (eighteen)parking stalls. This would result in about a 5%parking reduction and actually still provides 44 more stalls than is minimally required. This reduction does not count the stalls the applicant has provided near the loading bays and the fact that there would be some additional space along the east side of the building for some stalls if the building were shifted west. 9. Conformance with the Building and Fire Codes will be determined with the submission of detailed plans. The applicant will have to provide adequate fire protection and mitigation fees. 10. As noted,most of the impacts of the development would be due to the size and location of the new building adjacent to the apartment complex. It is not that the store or buffer/screening wall is so tall, but comparatively and due to its proximity its affects are magnified. 11. The criteria specifically allow for modifications to loading areas to mitigate undesirable impacts: The Hearing Examiner shall also have the power to fix the location and configuration of driveways,walkways,parking and loading areas, emergency access,curbs,planting areas,and signs. And these mitigation measures may be imposed to reduce the impacts of certain development features: b. Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size,bulk,height,and intensity,or site layout is permitted that violates the spirit and/or intent of the Zoning Code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties. 12. Therefore,the applicant who knows the needs of the store should be directed to alter the location of the delivery bay to move it at least five(5)additional feet from the south property line of the adjacent apartment complex. In addition,any buffer wall that is constructed along the common property line should step down in height as it moves eastward a sufficient distance from the trash/recycle bins. Baylis Brand Wagner Architects Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 12 13. There will be some increase in traffic but it will be spread out over the day. There will be some changes in traffic flow since the applicant will be opening a corridor through the Wendy's site to Rainier. Staff is somewhat concerned about this as it will probably increase turning movements onto Rainier at a non-signalized intersection. It would appear that if these turning movements create problems,the City should have the ability to limit turning movements or foreclose them entirely. Both the Wendy's site and this site have had sufficient access in the past without this interconnection,and it seems that if a danger arises the City should be able to reevaluate the situation as necessary. 14. There is some uncertainty about what will be permitted over and along the Seattle pipeline corridor. Seattle may not permit larger plantings, if it permits anything at all. Since there could be a limitation on larger vegetation,any vegetation in the corridor at this time should be maintained and larger species should be left in place to avoid the possibility that they may not be allowed to be replaced by more desirable street specimens. 15. The site appears to be well designed internally. The parking aisles are well laid out;there are pedestrian connections between parking,buildings and the surrounding streets. The exterior treatment of the complex with its articulations,height modulations and varied materials should prove to be visually interesting and provide a nice streetscape. 16. With the exception of its possible impacts on the value of the apartment complex,the development should not adversely affect other property values. Clearly,this upgrade will probably increase the overall tax base of the City. 17. The applicant's provision of a passage between the apartment complex and the new development will welcome residents and make use of the new center easier for residents. Again, adequate provision for pedestrian movement seems assured by the plan. 18. The issues of light and air have been discussed in terms of the adjacent apartment complex. On the site itself the low-rise nature of the site and its relatively open south and west exposure should provide sufficient access to light and air. 19. In conclusion,the general plan to upgrade this Safeway site is commendable and generally well- planned. It would appear with some minor modifications its untoward impacts on an existing apartment complex can be solved without severely hampering the redevelopment potential of the site. DECISION: The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall alter the location of the delivery bay to move it at least five(5)additional feet from the south property line of the adjacent apartment complex. Any buffer wall that is constructed along the common property line shall step down in height as it moves eastward a sufficient distance from the trash/recycle bins. 2. The applicant shall move the building footprint betwen 5 to 9 feet west to provide that much additional setback east of the building. The applicant may create additional parking stalls, if necessary, in surplus landscaping areas or in the enlarged eastern setback. Baylis Brand Wagner ArchitecLb Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 13 3. All larger street trees and vegetation that already exists in the Seattle pipeline corridor that Seattle does not object to remaining shall be maintained. Trees which may injure persons may be removed or pruned as necessary. If removal of such trees will prevent their replacement,removal should be predicated on a full analysis and should not be undertaken lightly. 4. The City, in its sole discretion, shall maintain the ability to limit cross-traffic or turning movements or foreclose them entirely between the subject site and Wendy's or along Rainier Avenue. 5. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 6. The use of the garbage areas,trash compactor and delivery hours shall be limited to the hours between 6:00 a.m.and 10:00 p.m. ORDERED THIS 16th day of July, 1998. FRED J.KA�J MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMI F1'ED THIS 16th day of July, 1998 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Rich Wagner Michael McMillin 1055 S Grady Way 10801 Main Street,#110 10801 Main Street,#110 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue,WA 98004 Bellevue,WA 98004 Joe&Lyn Lightfoot Mitch Johnson Neil Watts 3330 Island Crest Way P.O.Box 85001 1055 S Grady Way Mercer Island,WA 98040 Bellevue,WA 98005-8501 Renton,WA 98055 Connie Troyer Gloria Laws Bird Kevin Barber 316 Earlington Avenue SW 8722 S 121st 10801 Main Street,#110 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98178 Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of July, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev. Administrator South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,July 30, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Baylis Brand Wagner ArchitecLs Safeway Development File No.: LUA-98-052,SA-H July 16, 1998 Page 14 Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. k nil ,,itnNoNi. 1 l = Ig_l I \I j t \\ kip R-io : kai) 9Z1 CO . 1 . 1 .../ ' ! . •1.1 --- -,1 _:.ai L. ig- -4 tral pry ..-.,..„ ...........„..e.t _ c '-"--1-ri ,Ts. •-1' 11110 1 145. ....,,L....Q) - • 1 , - , - kn i 1 _...R.- .8 R-8 1,1 r --. ; 1 :\,_ 1 • ce -:- isi S 132 C.----.... -._ NW-2narzt ; IIIIMMumy i cif 11111 -1 : 0.4i.i 1 ........ ....__ ig - ICA i., cc 1 _1 !I 1 m .... .., RENTOM CITY LIMITS .% , STThidini Utt .1 ; '''.RrEi II, ; ; W •0n . . Nve• ... .........., : get°11 W Viet \-- . 141 1133111331 \\,\N,......._ 1#3, mem • `Q.1- 4 .1 44 • gri itz 1 i. --- I- -- SITE OF PROPOSED .. fil 111 LI cp DEVELOPMENT .... ../1 1.6.: ,- I.w. ..,R110 !El - • CD(P) '),, N. I =1 ..t I " 11(1 s CA•6 DETAIL .. 7.-: 'i;" it- S 13ith R, •• ,. ; NEW SAFEWAY -. •11 '` S 2nd St. S 2nd Mr A CD ._i/D C.A ' ,,,cwi liz-ji R_Io _ . ,E CD...kikilik,lk, • . ....1)..f...F -Cc1.4: .7 075.... ...7. PI D . CiTD:::::. _C--.D.:ta.2 a..":.'* ':1'S-41../ ' • '2 - ' - Ca •-- . itiatzt;f4;;ii ....,., /pi. I P... 11111 ,4114. top- NO5' CA i ,.i!, atclid 74 C A t , ••„.....,---. ; s Srd 1 P :; -....._g 7-"---Z ; CD .013 yisl. .4 0 ' hr.- ‘.\* doe. ., ....-I .: , $.,p, 7 --RLSt \ ,1 1 1...... I.' \ I e..,..4 %.\V'1 \.,..,, .--" CD et) CD..- CDC CD -........... .- - ' 'S ' -- 7 • cil: di CD I ...'"' CA'-7.' Ivo-t---.--0.. ._ tsA ‘ ... - ',%Itslt. CA PP CD CD.cp D CD7... —.„. /,-, _ _- - cu .ti --r,--„ ..s, •:--. .„, -- ..;.„, *;; on CD( 1; iityi rt .7-- :L. -:..,-" ..,,,-- 5t17 pi. • -RM—I- (?;3 ''''''CA ''71. * ---- • Ala lit'QIt I .L...< a RM-14; 0 -4...,_!' •• %. .,_54- . . :V) e, cv _.- m . ...--- ...----0 -.- m m ' 1 . .-; -1--- -1......--; . --- 1- ,- § x -...co .. co . ..•...... Q.; s. . . . c, , •,....... sv -.! •aci_ -I. ._ - 64. •-x ---- -: 'S ...._.6;_h- __St -._u :71-- •• ' -- - -1 '-'j T- T x I- x •CO , C 0 g :,_ - ,,r; " I I IX •Ce- 1 • L•41 10 c.1.-. m , s 7,,h •• ,.; ...., ____ _ , .._.. . , , , , •)\c‘ il ,kt... : , . , , . , ti IC10.13ORN 11...A I• I i I i I . . -... r. i _._. I, IFY7 i .- i r A. : ILMIIS NE I GHBORHOOD PLAN nRAND 1,\ACNE I _________ =------- -----------1 *''''' '".'-•Z ... oar ...........-........., AO _ 1 r. COin al St I 0o t-- t S. 2ND ST. �� 1 s. W.' III d1Ifhi R � I . . a ii I a .. = USE7111111Fr C .. I f ```Y111 I 1 )� T _ •f. I' AMIN -`_ PROJECT INFORMATION 4 • Pols pc,PI Ell — . NOT A PART /'� • �n.s aoe.u u • Y(((---'w'� _' isn fYi IrC %1 TI T USE o a *I •_ - ............._....- - � I. j . Nr C PROPOSED USES, a•. I I C�`` 'y{I. E ` 1L :1F •I{' ,a;q'w„ , '^ zoNlNb: �...c.....w..•.. W �p�5 LJ. • C I '• , IC.r+../ ,1 T �. _ •• IUCNI&� Iasw.r ' 517E AREA:z .ICC �. u 141.- .. &11LDIN&AREA. nonou .... WOO 1, • ~L�a.��. f.; .-' ' ' LOT COVERAbE: f I" 4,4 J _ I -•A , _ ' PARAINIS REQUIRED ill! i raAo W.Rrom ».r.cn • 7' •'/ I I --" —••—R—••— •—••^� / ' i $APETNY RISb3 M•S51 I I� R'�"'"A-- • l1 N.1. PARKINb PROVIDED J} I FI p NOT APART 'f • 1 .• di) ki I I t�. M, •7,, - y TYPICAL STALL DIMENSIONS: N...c.. .:..r /A'I j j J 11 �. I•' _ PARKING LANDSCAPE WIMP) Wee SF .ore..1olu..�. .,aoo III III NOTA PARS 1 �. /.. • 'i 4011 0 t�IIIrIII4P I GENE'S RCSigtuliC r..o.r..w. _� =t SJILDINb KIbNT: Ii I j J .a �...� e Rom,...nut.Rom„ •/�.• I: u. I BUILDINb SETBACKS. �I III, I I � / . -1 _� ..�. .\.. , "'� .<» ' -. _ �4' iw\'l fi li `I'�.I. 'I lI. I A / _ _ L .....Mama t a/ .Ro,R,R'A.Rae. !11!PWI II.VW ORC PLAN nawamas Ma MM. APPUGATIP • 4 m • I YNIl «c.N O•JT!PLAN am... ' ...... • •_.�__. AO i. 9 C"b(S3 6 R I�Gti' ik- S. 2ND ST,"n.nr--_ IIII I I I I I I III _T'_ .. ��` � ) e � �jl I IIII 40 $ bar na + sw.dL/Fvrr7An ,!�,,uay'�iy�Hrx TJe5 A.r�! • 14•77,re 0/r4,45, • Y I , 1t1' ,w• / 1 • Vt41 I I I I I I I I • � I I 1!:-.:. tl ---------.........................„........„._ in • i • I. ) I t ; l l ��;f j I a' • • fayaie P T M F ti S I1 W • 010 Pte.?: i. •..... Q 2x r r n• • • -ill) 10I I I . l ) I 1 �II�III�� j. '; I - I1 I I I � ) I I 1,41 .. I I I I L 2.7 $ArewAY*1563(N-55) I Q G saov v. 4. I ► I I I ' ) I i 1 1 11V 1 1 I I I t7( I I I.r� I f rxx CVO) l= ='` ; I ,4 7e.ram+ E 'I i I I �u) j III ?_�...s l J F.b - • rwu urr_/x7;�tn w r II II j eA-,s- �ym-,.....r a. F,W a i• �..'� I I I�) .wr u'nrMj I I Z „ -• Ye I I I I �� I � 1 f76e rtry6 f'. ,, i � - 7 a• 1__..,,::iw'idbfYieo;4i6Y,��7,,��tt�!a •647;.47,e oa �,yrk, a j 4. - Rr�:'." t311W? it 1i�6!"-9C • iliiiiiiIHim Y•.� '-ow a 14v R-.143..Qi . ':'., •,.0 ��II 1 E� a. _ • ` sn,a S. 3RD AGC'77y1 l�tn ! Y•1 . IL-A�NDDSCCAPE PLAN iir/7a.n,r'r p. > 30 60 ..m.m.rom .k.7..-=...__...."_ / umantwommom ..n..re...a+— 4..4...... '- •---7:27..="-+ .....— .... —OM& •••••••• --.-- eft. 0 ) ,AP'—'._,WEV471-'' - - — --7°\'''''P_-_- __ • • co - BEEE9-„_ __, FOOD&DRUG • CO=—,r==. --4-----; ., T TIT T 1 1 1 I Ar-n4: 11,1 , \-,- ---1 --,": 11.1 ill,T Y I.-, 0.,.. , -- '-'1,51,..,----- --../M= ---. o •i-.5 ERFEEL. 94 /iL ..._m__, add —IF _____• ,.._____ ..... , :::7......... 1Y \-........ ,....... Prow a.. lora us§ 0 ! O PCST ELEVATION q) i - . _. 'F-- :1-÷--:1--------÷--7--17:- .......•• •••.Tc--",... ..,,,. I _ 1 p_. ,___1 la i -- LIM NM UM Egi ---II -.L.a"•. E----------=:_:_,_-_,. .......... ,... ..„.111r 0 SOON ELEVATION .....r. ..-- 1 .1 -E-. -1-----1-C-- . --L---- \.: ._________ _ ,1.4.4k," 4 . • I I v -- c: :_z;.:§Igtekatetwattswtotw w w et;W.ind CM COIN tatigitig' i. . ct - -......_ 0 CA3T ELEVATION C----7 ----I., 71 ( ---7 ----- ----- : — • - - - - - - - ----—--•- -•--- 7-_-71-77--Z-.5-7 -7--7--:-. 5-=..,------ - ---=::-----2i7 sip 40,1.4.11MCVM,.6NTGART6VVEfagg Ne.I MO (i)'' 7.Z.Z. .,... .. • 0 NORTH ELEVATION worw ,.., . ., -.I , . .1—--F:ra-• ,,./- --' 154-11iiiiiiiiiiimilmil r 1 1 \-- ELLVATIO, I SEGIC.E. I I • NTE I'LAN ra510,÷ I AFTLICATI I Km WII51,55' I . • 1 0 1 11\11IS , . 6Z I-- IIR\NI , li •••..... r.-73.70E 0 SECTION AT EAST PROPIXTY LW 0 SE4TION AT SO/NERD __ ________±_ 51ALET . CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 240A day of tuvtt.. , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing HfG oer docurr ents. This information was sent to: Name Representing S:sECWO.� Yetirh Btulea'' 1us @Ye.vtd. Wo_cr.e.r ;-1 ovta, "Pat YZi CDt1hte rtrovo Cot avui Lip LuaVit- of (Signature of Sender) au k. S.csrer" STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) rr I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that - - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for-the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 6, /q1 (� Notary ubli and for the State of W ngton Notary (Print)MARILYN KAMCI IEF F My appointme' uMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: sir4A110,' S OP It Project Number: WIA ,q8, pc-Z SR_tk ,El, NOTAR'.DOC CIT'. OF RENTON y . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 24, 1998 Mr. Kevin Barber Baylis Brand Wagner Architects 10801 Main Street, Suite#110 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Safeway Development Project No. LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF • Dear Mr. Barber: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. As you know, the date of Tuesday, June 30, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the Site Approval (SA). The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, g&— Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Safeway, Inc./Owners FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Thic nernr rnnloin�Sr,O rnr..rin.i mnlerinl 7A'L nncl rnnc mne NOTIQE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION &PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center,replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 58,300 sq.ft.Safeway store and 10,275 sq.R.of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site,with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South.The proposal includes 328 parking spaces.Access Is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street,one driveway off South Second Street,and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South.Location:203 South Second Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 6:00 PM June 22, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in Judgment,or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,if the Environmental Review Committee finds them is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination.then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter,Land Use . Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals of the environmental determination 111CW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197.11480]must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22,1998. If no appeals are tiled by this date,both actions wilt become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235- 2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington,on June 30.1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval. The applicant or representative(s)of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. II uur :I_u Airport Bay t_R 'l `a�I i ia.s Ib Iin1r7C1W1M . a a CA 5-7Hun till I II : •, sot o krs.2` . 0 ilEmcm IGI .__ -� ILA j�jE ;; -ii ,,.. L s znd St. . 1'� rite r co,N m 1 W S. ` CA as ee • gitti RM-I ' m ITA r` � r� CA � a a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION . I - Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification.< CERTIFICATION I, 54(0,449 Im i o r1►-ki , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on iU nG S ,I 11€ Signed: SMmA. -1; ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and/for the State of Washington residing in'7.L.,,,,(,,„, ,on the /0 -0., day of)7r,..ite ,'1 f1 -------17)-1 et-}-i-44-e's 9(:)--A- riallt--,(ff---------- MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 30, 1998 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCILC AMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON`'MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2 JO MILL AV'EN UB SOUTH Tie application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order In:which they will be heard. Items will be called for bearing at the discretion of the Hearing F»xaminer PROJECT NAME: Safeway Development PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store aid 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of ft e site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings a*e located with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, two driveways off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier P venue South. There are also service driveways off South Third Street and Shattuck Avenue to access the truck loading and trash area on the back, east side of the building. Location: 203 South Second treet. GNDA.DOC City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: June 30, 1998 Project Name: Safeway Development Applicant/ Kevin Barber Address: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects 10801 Main St., Suite 110 Bellevue, WA. 98004 Owner/ Safeway, Inc. Address: 1121 124th NE Bellevue, WA. 98015-8501 File Number: LUA-098-052, ECF, SA-H Project Manager: Peter Rosen • Project Description: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, two driveways off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. There are also service driveways off South Third Street and Shattuck Avenue to access the truck loading and trash area on the back, east side of the building. Project Location: 203 South 2nd Street • Airport Way -- 8 -2nd7St ,_,Ti �� A , � � , $ ve. S To'igiaAjSt. R 8 i! CD RM-u e11�c� w .� i RIB , ��8 ,� :.- �s� .--1Ct01� A v) CA la _ ► ' I --\` N SITE OF PROPOSED --' O.1 ' .. °W R710 - - \� C D(P) DEVELOPMENT :L- J 2 V s CA. // i::FEwAY 1. • •, CITY LIMITS-mil .-4 CA -- T I _ CA ` S:.� ,.«, S 2nd St. 1 J t 'l. �; - Rr8 2 j BCD, — LahT "�i. R-10 _ r CD o_�C A cp Cllci CD . R/ 8/; F ��< I „.,� j cD-F 1 CAI ri -. , 8 i 0 CA !Pa9 CA i IcpI I EMI I�;rl CD. -- Ore�\° S 3rd 1'1.I _ c: �j CD em CD►I CD( CD _ S SW) `� CA`, C A 1 I`f C- - CD GD CD GD D CD City of Renton P/B/PW Department I-re„minary Report to the Hearing Examiner SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 2 of 10 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 Owner of Record: Safeway, Inc. 2 Zoning Designation: Commercial Arterial (CA) 3. Comprehensive Plan Employment- Commercial (EAC) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Commercial retail 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multi-family residential, High School fields, Offices. East: Restaurant, Funeral Home, Parking. South: Commercial West: Commercial 6 Access: South 2nd Street, South 3rd Street, Rainier Avenue South 7 Site Area: 263,900 sq. ft., 6 acres, 8 Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 44,214 sq. ft New Building Area: 66,575 s.f. Total Building Area: 66,575 s.f. C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 156 5/18/09 Annexation 910 8/12/31 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning Code 4405 6/7/93 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 Utilities: Water: New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (building fire control system) will be required and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of all new proposed buildings on site. New water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults and water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City. Water (SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. HEXRPT2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Frriiiiiinary Report to the Hearing Examiner SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 3 of 10 Sewer: The site will be required to connect to existing sewer mains located in South 3rd Street (8 inch) by new side sewer connections with permit fees at $80/connection. All on-site food preparation areas will require grease trap/interceptor meeting current UPC codes/standards. Wastewater(SDC) fees of $0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Surface Water/Storm Water: The surface water drainage system and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required for new impervious surfaces (more than 5,000 sq. ft.) subject to vehicular use. Surface water (SDC) fees of $0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface are required. Fire Protection: Provided as per City of Renton Ordinance Transit: Numerous Metro bus routes run along S. 2nd Street and S. 3rd Street. The Renton Transit Center will be constructed between S. 2nd and S. 3rd Streets and Logan Avenue S. and Burnett Avenue S., providing extensive local and regional bus connections. 4. Other: Site is outside Aquifer Protection Areas (APA) E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Zoning Code- 4-31-10.4 - Commercial Arterial Zone 2. Zoning Code - 4-31-33 - Site Plan Review 3. Parking and Loading Ordinance - Chapter 14 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Land Use Element - Employment Area-Commercial (EAC) Economic Development Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant requests site plan approval for the redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The four existing buildings that would be demolished are: the 26,388 sq. ft. Safeway, 13,762 sq. ft. A & H Drugstore, 1,817 sq. ft. Custom Picture Frame, and the 2,247 sq. ft. Viking/White Sewing & Vacuum. The applicant has assembled several parcels for the proposed shopping center development. HEXRPT2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department , ,,,,,ninary Report to the Hearing Examiner SAFEWAYDEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 4 of 10 The site is uniquely located at the edge or gateway to downtown Renton with exposure to Rainier Avenue South (a major commercial arterial) as well. The existing buildings are generally oriented toward the local streets (S. 2nd and S. 3rd) with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The truck loading and trash compactor area is located on the east side of the proposed building, accessed from S. 3rd Street. The proposed project includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, two driveways off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. There are also service driveways off South Third Street and Shattuck Avenue to access the truck loading and trash area on the back, east side of the building. On the north edge of the project site is the Seattle Public Utility Cedar River pipeline. Seattle Public Utility owns a 66 foot wide pipeline right-of-way that separates the subject site from South 2nd Street. Access to South 2nd is by benefit of a Use Permit across the pipeline corridor. Any work, including landscaping and the excavation/extension of utilities, conducted within the 66 foot wide pipeline corridor will require the approval of the Seattle Public Utility. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on June 2, 1998 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. The mitigation measures are listed below. The comment/appeal period for the SEPA threshold determination ended on June 22. No comments or appeals were received. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $59,669.25 (795.59 trips x $75 = $59,669.25). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. HEXRPT2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department , ,—,ninary Report to the Hearing Examiner SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 5 of 10 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The Site Plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The site is designated Employment Area - Commercial (EAC) in the Comprehensive Plan. Land uses intended for the EAC designation are those that require large amounts of land and high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic. (Objective LU-AA) The large retail use is consistent with the EAC designation. The orientation of the building toward Rainier Avenue is appropriate, given the arterial connection that characterizes the land use designation. The site design provides convenient pedestrian access from S. 2nd and S. 3rd Streets which responds to the pedestrian environment encouraged along local downtown streets. The proposal is consistent with the following EAC policies related to the site plan.. Policy LU-169. Individual parcels should be encouraged to consolidate to maximize flexibility of site design and reduce access points. Policy LU-176. Increased demand for commercial uses should be accommodated through redevelopment and intensification of Employment Area - Commercial designations rather than expansion of those areas. Policy LU-160. Developments should provide appropriate treatment (e.g. landscaping, improved building facade) along major arterials to mitigate adverse visual impacts. Policy LU-174. Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffers, berms), especially along the roadways, to reduce the visual impacts. Policy LU-177. Special design considerations (e.g. landscape, streetscape, signage, building design) should be encouraged for areas which are designated as gateways for the city. The south elevation of the building along S. 2nd Street (extends approximately 200 feet) includes windows, building modulation and building details which contribute to the streetscape. The north part of the building is for other retail shops besides Safeway and the building facade facing S. 3rd Street does not appear designed because the tenants are not presently known and this portion of the building would be constructed in Phase 2 Landscaping along the street frontages would adequately screen the appearance of the parking lot. The proposal also furthers the City's intent to expand the retail sales base. Policy ED-8. Increase the retail sales tax base of the City. HEXRPT2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department 1-fultininary Report to the Hearing Examiner SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 6 of 10 (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4- 31-10.4 Commercial Arterial (CA) of the Zoning Code [adopted June 1993] are applicable to this proposal Permitted Uses The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). Food and groceries are listed as primary permitted uses in the zone. The CA zone also allows for a wide variety of commercial retail and service uses that would apply to the adjacent shops. Setbacks The CA zone requires a front/street building setback of a minimum of 10 feet. The subject site fronts along S. 2nd and S. 3rd Streets. The proposed building is setback 10 feet from S 3rd Street, which meets the setback standard while also maintaining a connection between the building and the street. The proposal also meets the street setback along S. 2nd Street. No rear or side/interior setbacks are required for development in the CA zone. The proposal includes a minimal 5 foot rear setback from the east property boundary. The proposed building would be situated approximately 17 feet from the existing apartment building on adjacent property to the east. This issue is discussed further in later sections of this report. Height - The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The proposal complies with the height limit. According to the building elevations, the maximum building height of the front facade would be the 36 feet. The subject site is located directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway. Building heights are restricted to 69 feet in elevation to avoid penetration of reserved air space surfaces. The proposed building height is a maximum of 36 feet above the finished ground surface and 69 feet in elevation which meets the airport height restrictions. Lot Coverage - Maximum allowable lot coverage for buildings in the CA zone is 65%. The proposal would result in lot coverage of approximately 25% of the lot area, well below the maximum allowed. Parking Requirements - The City's Parking and Loading Ordinance requires shopping centers to provide a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. The proposal includes a total floor area of 66,575 square feet. Thus, a minimum of 266 and a maximum of 333 parking spaces are required by the code. The proposal includes a total of 328 parking spaces which meets the minimum requirement. Landscaping - Lots abutting public streets in the CA zone are required to provide a minimum landscape strip of 10 feet. The proposed site plan complies with the minimum requirement along both the street frontages. The landscape strips are well-planted with a mix of conifer and deciduous trees, shrubs and groundcover. The driveway entries have widened landscape areas. The landscape frontage along S. 2nd Street is actually within the Seattle Public Utility pipeline corridor, and the proposed landscaping and plant materials would require their approval. Staff from the Seattle Public Utility has indicated that only plants with limited root depths would be approved. It appears likely that the landscape plan along this frontage will have to be revised accordingly. Renton Parks Department staff has commented on the landscape plan, requesting removal of existing trees along the site street frontages. Their comments will be forwarded to the applicant for revisions to the landscape plan submitted with building permits. HEXRPT2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department rreuminary Report to the Hearing Examiner SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 7 of 10 The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that large parking lots over 10,000 square feet in size have a minimum of 5% interior landscaping. According to the site plan submittal, the proposal would require 7,000 square feet of parking lot landscape area and approximately 8,000 square feet is provided. The code requires pedestrian connections to be provided between the public entrance of buildings and the street. The proposal provides excellent connections to the sidewalks along both S. 3rd and S. 2nd Streets. (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The proposed building is located on the east portion of the lot so that the front of the building can be oriented towards Rainier Avenue. In order to provide for adequate parking in front of the store, the building is pushed as far to the east property line as is possible. This site layout/orientation concept is appropriate given the fact that the zoning and land use designation is Commercial Arterial which is intended for uses that require a large land area, high visibility and access to large volumes of automobile traffic. The back of the proposed store building would be approximately 17 feet from the adjacent apartment, blocking the south light exposure and views from the apartments, particularly from the south apartment building. The height of the Safeway store building would equal the height of the two-story apartment building. However, the proposal meets code setback standards and Environmental Review Committee did not consider this to be a significant environmental impact and did not impose mitigation measures. The truck loading and trash area for the store is located at the back of the building, facing and thereby impacting the adjacent properties to the east. This service area is directly adjacent to both an existing restaurant and to the apartments. There may be little alternative to this site arrangement if it is considered a given that the overall objective of the site plan layout is to orient the building to face Rainier Avenue. The location of the service area provides for good service vehicle access, with driveways off S. 3rd street and Shattuck Avenue. The truck loading area ramps below grade and it is enclosed by a retaining wall as well as a part of the building. However, the trash compactor is more exposed and would result in noise and visual impacts on the surrounding properties. The landscape plan includes minimal plant buffers around the site perimeters to attempt to mitigate the visual impacts. The plans also show a screen wall along a portion of the property line. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) recommended a site plan condition that the applicant extend the screen wall for the full length of the property. The apartment owner's letter also expressed concerns about the noise associated with the loading and trash area. To mitigate the impacts on adjacent properties, staff recommends that the applicant extend the screen wall, better enclose the trash compactor area, and that the applicant agree to limit the hours of truck loading to daytime hours. Other mechanical equipment would be located inside the building itself and would not result in noise impacts on neighbors. The subject proposal meets the setback standards of the zoning code, there are no special setback standards applied when a commercial proposal abuts an existing residential use located in a commercial zone. The apartments are located in the Center Downtown (CD) zone which allows for and policies actually encourage a mix of commercial and residential uses developed at a high level of urban intensity. The adoption of the policies and zoning presumed there would be impacts with associating commercial and residential uses at a close proximity. These impacts were considered in the environmental analysis that occurred with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning. HEXRPT2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department rreuminary Report to the Hearing Examiner SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 8 of 10 (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The proposal would redevelop the existing Safeway shopping center, improving both the subject site and contributing toward the redevelopment of the area. The site does not have particularly unique or special features that would be impacted by the development. There are some existing areas of trees on the site that would be impacted. The commercial redevelopment is consistent with and is encouraged by policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. As mentioned previously, the Seattle Public Utility Cedar River pipeline borders on the north edge of the project site and the 66 foot wide corridor actually separates the subject site from fronting on S. 2nd Street. The existing shopping center has access to S. 2nd Street across the corridor and presently utilizes the right-of-way area for landscaping and parking. The subject project plans to utilize the pipeline corridor in the same manner as the existing shopping center. Seattle Public Utility retains full ownership rights of the corridor and thus has the jurisdiction to evaluate and approve all work (including landscaping, the extension of utilities, access, etc.) proposed over the pipeline corridor. The principal issue of Seattle Public Utility concerns ground penetrations (landscape trees, excavation for utilities) that could impact the pipeline, and permanent structures that could impede access for maintenance or emergency repair of the pipelines. It is expected that Seattle Public Utility will have comments on the new landscaping proposed, the additional driveway cut onto S. 2nd Street, and the sign proposed along the street frontage. It is not expected for Seattle Public Utility to question the use of the area for parking. Access to S. 2nd is by benefit of a Use Permit across the pipeline corridor. This is a cancelable permit and includes conditional parking privileges. However, this is not expected to be a contentious issue according to conversations between staff. At this time, Seattle Public Utility has granted no approvals on the Safeway plan. They require more complete plans than site plan review for their evaluation and approval. The applicant has submitted an alternative site plan showing the development proposal without use of the pipeline corridor. This alternative is intended to demonstrate that Safeway has a viable site plan proposal if they are unable to gain the necessary approvals of the Seattle Public Utility. Staff has reviewed the alternative site plan. The proposal would lose 16 parking spaces, leaving 312 spaces which still meets the minimum number of parking spaces, as 263 are required by the code. All utilities connect to S. 3rd Street so no utility lines would be needed to cross the pipeline corridor. The elimination of driveway accesses to S. 2nd Street would be more of an inconvenience to the applicant, though the Fire Department would need at least an emergency access from S. 2nd Street. The site plan alternative is not a preferred option. However, it does demonstrate that Safeway has a viable site plan without use of the Seattle Public Utility property. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposed redevelopment of the existing shopping center would improve area-wide property values. The proposal would serve downtown residents, supporting efforts to create a viable, mixed-use downtown district. It would also add to the commercial uses oriented toward Rainier Avenue. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; Access is proposed via two driveways off S. Third Street, two driveways off S. Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off HEXRPT2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 9 of 10 Rainier Avenue S. The driveway off Rainier Avenue will allow limited turn movements, right turn in and out only, due to existing traffic controls. There are service driveways off S. Third Street and Shattuck Avenue S., to access the truck loading and trash area on the back, east side of the building. Transportation staff has approved the number and general location driveways accessing the site. The internal circulation on the site is designed in a safe and efficient manner. The truck loading and garbage area is separated from the customer circulation and driveway accesses. The apartment owner's letter states there is an existing gate which links the Safeway and the apartment building site. This pedestrian access is well-utilized by the senior citizen residents and the owner requests that the access be maintained to allow residents to continue their present shopping patterns. The existing gate location would enter the small parking area behind the future retail shops. It does not appear that retaining this connection would interfere with the operations or security of the shopping center. It would require a break in the landscaping strip between the properties. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the site plan to maintain the pedestrian access to the apartments, unless the applicant can demonstrate that it would substantially interfere with the operations or security of the shopping center. The shopping center is well-designed to achieve visibility from Rainier Avenue, while also contributing to the pedestrian environment and streetscape envisioned for downtown along the site frontages of S. 3rd and S. 2nd Streets. There are uninterrupted pedestrian sidewalks effectively linking the street sidewalks to the building entry. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed building meets the height and setback requirements of the zoning code, and there would be adequate light and air to the proposed store. The proposed building would result in shading impacts on the adjacent apartment building. However, the Environmental Review Committee did not determine this to be a significant environmental impact and did not impose mitigation measures. (8) NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; Noise, dust and odors would result with construction of the project. These impacts would be mitigated through measures described in the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management practices. The operation of the shopping center uses is not expected to create harmful or unhealthy conditions. Potential noise impacts of truck loading and the trash compactor on adjacent uses has been addressed in other sections of this report. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND There are adequate utilities and roads available to serve the proposed shopping center. Police and Fire have indicated that adequate resources exist to serve the proposed uses. A previous report section provides further detail concerning availability of public services and facilities. HEXRPT2.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Fren,;iinary Report to the Hearing Examiner SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE:JUNE 30, 1998 Page 10 of 10 (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by redeveloping and improving an existing shopping center. The proposal is well-designed for orientation to the commercial arterial (Rainier Avenue) while also addressing the downtown area. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Safeway Development File No. LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H subject to the following conditions: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2) To mitigate the noise impacts associated with truck loading and the trash compactor area, the applicant shall extend the screen wall, enclose the trash compactor area, and record a restrictive covenant limiting truck loading activities to daytime hours. These measures shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of building permits. (3) The applicant shall revise the site plan to maintain the pedestrian access to the adjacent apartments, unless the applicant can effectively demonstrate that this connection would substantially interfere with the operations or security of the shopping center. The revised plans shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of building permits. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals(SA): Two(2)years from the final approval (signature) date. HEXRPT2.DOC milmir ,I li �� rili NOTES sua3ees•.rr.neng w.n..to..rom loan reef pravaee 4 1t gug� vw 7 4.egoes canalteara = �,� '° I I rx Levi, 5.•�I.tell n all p ima spit .2.orm ` Ol�•� •w�rvab. rn 3.3..00a•n•trte� • depth rti goes bo•m/wrc�n�ail pwrtrg ww. ./pc'"e "qip1 u�•ye of�ao. I gwwa.�ean>a.n. S.:4pin pi '�^J•0011 w.R V ls.=1,1.a.Ia cant rr I �� ee rare my..w'�eyv'.e.n�aw rzywee.e> �� F 11 '' w>.e ro�r..,w al MITYMIN' pp4M p. TM*piairas a boo trwgr:goo, _..1 _ n wi r 11�➢.�M�. fir^" e.All ve.,re n.p.u.e w.we c.w.r o-er�o. p e• f ' . yr�v°u.s e •" � '• i �eep.en.�a.aivs w arvy"ba l w neMave.rw.�a pbrthg ono, y P g g$L i of ;"a�78 " ""$.: . eaaggr.aa. �.. a ec.�g F$ $d5g 0. o. — s2•tram ace for•o- TACO TIME • IIetrildrq bark rang wV NNW&b+'PO ad)...toiEVQtCREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAL11.2 n w rw OOP 1leat a�.ca.+rmv 14 whoa a•tor. • � erer.n o-"A fg It ' / m n.rcn Q 4-5 N ____ ._.. I \� GROUND COVER$PACWC DETA0. LAMN/PLANTING BED DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL w I n•.•s►Tnays.pa.., ua ea... wew. MENDY'S i I c Q o —� f— I w 0 Z 4-1 -- __ il.._y.1 ( PLANT UST CA` Q r • -' 7rAt/ MrAyt Afe. - - Q V r L __.—f a i7tele.4 CC/.wFd/•A r'/hCNow•Pbpwiry PSMT 1"�4°CA/yA�rrmn./NV IL 1 1 10 ACLi t'u`xZvn'hav Hr1/' / avxv Ile//Paper : GIST- 3:9 ._ I / c�6j _. _.._=-_-�j__ .__. r i � v/ry4{A/�r�PLKA'-an R/.0 U''tlzvwtlGtii YiyJY Pif 9�L r__- - -•__.__._-_-- - O o17n41 Frns'vi /' grssrr ,...1uiin, 27•/7vq. r O JLAF7utd5 Ch3rr..eA'/S 'PHszenrU4 acrrorxie ...ai .4Pur PF/rze!',14.0,74.0-5•.fr'b, o Pru7ar Z., 'O/Yb LWj 7' / arra LuJl'ln//L!tl 2,�a//A7, tC'mvslik i '_ JGs7iw'�L•5 H. 'iry.L'C GW/GS'//l7Xl CALMY$,✓7 a-r' /�Aidt 9tf�OL. T J I FhiI atzrtitr yas uvv- is/ /emrfartrf 4'pT 21 'la 0 s--ter r.* -'?A&' A.:6 w'eiI- 2'GaG,x� a.. > 9 I j I 0 CrNtbJCLs,Watt75 LAA�-34.-a .!Y[p7trr3'/ Gc. 4244_ .2n a-Pene . !!r/%.•- r h� ih ' h�i ,t1 11011. , I a zW i t r W u Et s1 1 I w < I x E•u % N N �+Z • dO• R Shoat LANDSCAPE PLAN u oR�L-1D L-2 11 O v `1 --- _2ND ST. 1-it.\„,.II111I II _ _ LEGEND v I -,�r � I I I I,IBC___ I 11. ----,` g I - r'� - rw} DENOTES CALIPER SIZE:°.: TREE AND REMOVALcnTOTAL TREES ON,SITE BE REMOVED= 53 i �';of A yyI ,�—t oL. �\1`1 �vf ll III I r CPI �K DENOTES CALIPER SIZE TREE AND PRESERVATION I (/ I 1 L1J \fir\s/� TOTAL TREES ON SITE DE RETAINED= 18 z 1/1 WOW UN I �/ TOTAL PERCENTAGE RETAINED= 25R Q I 1 _ I real°' ra ;,I f,,.�„m, D_ I J 1-I; i I I -_ ly o L� al .,1 JT r I ID� _ O • , j -_ K `► .111KK , 4 l; I w u_ ,I Q ,11 ; `` i 'r _, �lI I.J. , _ �., j I. :�ew. � •r t • • .2.:t'n I SAFEVAY•1563(M-55) �� a �'N ` evwo \ I I , i IJr ; i I I %AGO SF. • lrko. .1r ala 1 _` '-- . 'J ; �ft.va 1a�;, - - I I I I I 11 l � 11 ; I 11 , (01".--- 1 m z i. 1 W 11 i 1 Jl ' �`�, I '*-IYNIIAY W 0 ## \ W f 'ram [�'. a R I ' ' ' ' l Cl 'i am \ < - f 1 ! 0m .-._- •` `�I;IIII WI ... - _ .) _ ,- 1[013. k� -- 1 --inaa. J ` �/ S. 3RD Sr. r m '�`1 _` sn..l ® EXISTINGEXIN TREE(REMOVAL / RETENTION PLAN L-3 0 15 w CO . i S. 2ND ST. �T�w✓i inrn, .au rm'xr print rrayin/ / -- 1h .. 1��+F+y IIII IIIIII Ip '--r":t'-�7��----- s rfi P iP I 11 _l J_ o n� - $ b�,a .. rptu uds/ riAH am • ). Pr m7.�s, z�wvr ori)�lorrnyr .// Afrm a 11 • 1 c -ra7ri�.vim. • ' 'ij'I 40 i o exrr »u5 f ta /, ,leeii_aaa1aaaraiaeaa••ao�gk�i• ( ' ' � . Ql • !a:- 11 ,�� s Ili 4,13 �2, �� ('i'1' s - - ca:tz'r,-tee ( ;i ^Yl) 1 1 1 1111 1421 • tL c Exsrpie R/v'7. I: t..... /Iy�J �� wv�ww��aawa iair�i�C .-m rf4en. In tr i • ' ' OP 0;1 ', R�, / i , ,l i�1 a • 1 1 -t�'�•• Li.• lam, e SAFEWAY•1565(M-55) + a s d ' 9 ry : In) ' ) 4-i_!) waao sr. U J :• • ►1 AA • a V 6 Ine ,?t, I 4 `, wnr �r\ y i ,. , ..,., _..„. ...., • H ff...!.. wwamw ;• '�;I '�t) 41. (f . 6.�of p I` \ dxlCr prr.7riwaatiY M' w E. if Ji It J e�r'uc`^�- , • JP l rKL v�lra'r� z ul Si. • i • •siil7�f.. y�ro+, a °.a .... z oe. ,.ew ..,*.ig. .=.3 e3�t r t�lwgnxipi ',• °•Qpr'�w4. cJG_�`4,46;a9 4.°ooa d t i �) 1 ) PA III I�I II IIIIII� �E J Y1 rr)r. { 5�.a S. 3RD ST. //j�� LANDSCAPE PLAN // CV■/7 0 15 30 60 i , * lo i . •' .4 S E•••1/4 SEC-4.18. TWP1:23N., RQL.p.5E.,.NAL 4•4 " ,o4 ,•••4' ..2'' .4* * .3.1. „••• 19, 5... 2ND ST. •- .i EP.: 4. . re 4. I.9 .9* .2. ..P 4,..... 4* 4* 4* / .3.' * 4.* ........, „... .1* 7•!1,. to ' ' ,;.rt, ,CAt'„,,t, {,or 431. " 4,..1••• .... * .-.' ' mr - I - ; e; - - 4- 4 ' ,-2,71.•••.. .., ....--''' ,,r ...„ ...- ...0 , __... Ihil 'Mal...1 .tiMi a miNFWgmmiroMea 'Emir ......a . . ,, f „, ,..... . , , 4... .... ..... • ... 0 •.4m.....41-..-MU .-9 ,• .• .•-3 ' •-•-, -.-1.4111111//9NRImml•.01MINE. mi•raNmis.. ...•• ••••=M1 .3111* - 441 .." -1------ - - =-- - 7. - -- "-... • ailgt`...N.:1.- 1L41."... .47-e•0111 . 7 v MK . :. ...., .„. - .h_ ...„, ;..--F7.... •-,' - w ••9. f. . trgrr2itir. . 1 IftWi• ' 13' •0 • ..• - -f,Jr-7 n''' t.. '. ! 1;'• * 4 . -: 1 " .j•°.V.... 7.*..." 17,...1 ..ei -, ,„,,,,/to \11.4 ‘70.ECT *** • ' \ 4 ' . 41 . le 05RES'''. h° lit • i: ,,, .s.„, '" ''" .‘„, , .,. .4.' ••••,,, '4,' Iti ''' m, 7\11(1/42:9.•. ,t,../}4 .\.>„'1= 1 2' . • t• t / '''- rta•dar .• /la 1 I L.; !4 , .4' 1.11100GRCUM 1.1141113./ 010 OUSJITY VAULT *. \ ' '''*'/ ,_x, ..'.• ''' . Bttr ,.9* '/I • . :,\ABLI17 ) 1.51‘ Aste t A • . - . - .,, .. :...,,: ,.„ . II -e. > " I/' •," p e••”.... ....- • ,..._, .._......-------....... • •, __ .„, ,p .i. 1. rn,iiir-i ,N. •r ' i {O" " •••.' Ix I" Ipt, ..s." ,.,,•,A-.... o ,... , , •:.I ttc"0 '.0 z p *1".. 4 •3', '•r...... 4, , 312 , ••••• 0 ey.A.4917Z,-4, ,i ism l' ,,, ..,.• i‘ ',"'•--..; •II r - ''' '',0, pg:-15111//Mlig‘'' '21=' p ' /141 . 1 e.:*•-- "' .'.... 4. -,...'"."' ."" 111"-IMO".-siSr.' 'e '1 f j/,' 4 • lir V.7./A- Zell, ,••=.‘ mail .-' . 32 .,,...„ '. . IrC „ I iu .7•,,, ,..., • !I 4+ " '..). .. - 14 4('' ''X ..., • 1;:' . ...4"; /". .1'...--, ....- 0t. . . „ CV ts ''4 •f. .2t..-1-....a.F..... ".77,...". i I. CY •12' "N • .• ..---.• 4.72a „,/ ' . . /2121 ''. •." k• ih-•.• ..,,,, 4- • On' 4* " , (NI .' "M."- V• .'&12 =E-,, • -, =•4 NP-/ . . G 0 . .7 ° .4" ' '•7'It? • .11 •": ; 4 4. 294.34 Ct A "11 .'4S ..R.0... 1. ;•4.,.. o'k`. - .1. I • 0 .,,;.. ..•• , !..: , -- ,,,o ".. •i •••• 11: -7-4. 7. . ..,, 4. •,,' 0 . 4.) • • • • ' ..,'•• I 111 {' / / .4. .. .. W•s.. ••• ..4•, (I) _...../. (2.• 1. • .,,,. 14.2__E , •7.-120.DRAINS ... ' .... • . _i•---*\912.ii .,..• 1.314 &Oil \.52 , ..p. ... • •' .44. 30 • ' .4-1/-) NEW BLDG RUNOFF GRAPHIC SCALE , , UNDETAINED AND .., 4" . • " UNTREATED in CI I:I I i '' 'hi ...,..,„,„ ie.. .: 1 MO.30 IL • A .... , di'o .r,"___.,275v--- -.I ' •- :„... ,,, •- ,..• ' -..-::,,.. +..,: ,;,-- F.F.= 33.00 ..V ' .:...... ..,,-,:„. .., 810: .,. 4 ,' .411• ., 1 Cs1 ,•••.''• &twee ... .4 . '', , • • (...) ms•_,14* ""...". „..,,i>./...„ :J., " itP ...,' , kl :::"... ., f . ., .• .-”,...01. BUSH. ROED& HITCHING% INC. /25t. t----L-' I 1.0 i ,,, ,,, 1.513 . 'et 1.". l.. . ONO.ENGINEERS a ONO SURVSIENS i .../.• . * ,' ... . 7..: 0. •3• ..,..' 4. . i", ' .. I , ,.4 „.4.1 ‘,...r.Z • I Zstp. 1 ; e .,,,, . ..... ORM 511.11%rr* ....r.e.6•144,T., gg ' .44S ,' ' . ..... .9 J •a s ,, All • 4/ I Z% i ', .5, • ,7224' 4 ....''" ' .•.( q 5 5 ,0,.. 40/ ''' „...2..-. :it.„ ;',.- .•le . ,--1"1" . • CITY OF RENTON W.. --"'144-.1.''.'" :.,M -. 1111. h .'' ' - Ot«4ar. ill , . : .L.- ".. ^ '2' 1--`. . ., ;..:4::t ,,.,:t.v.2 OENANTAENT Of NUEN,IG WONNS ....... Cn Fa rc *... 0 1.3. 77„ .4". vittwormiimii - timervain -1:7- •/ ---- =2...-=••=1:,..-.••• • ..... =..'•'°--7-••••••••-=2.7. - -- ... SCHEMATIC GRADING &UTILITIES SAFEWAY STORE NO. 1563 ,wwe ,._. ..............--e>"-,... i >, , . , , ..• ,.., -- ., ..,, •-,-"" ..,,,,. . ,..; ,.,, •4,,_ '- m.o. 13.2_,.... 2-17-0 S.13,ND ST- . -,_. IM ______-...__... ,.. .--er. • ,_ 4 _4 iii. ° 29* 4 nu mom .-- __ --r- . '----1 --1 i'11 ..... - N-7° • c 32 EAA1A PAB 0.3.3.33 II.... ." .."''''' ......"........"' SC. ..30. .... ..* 3••••• 1 39 2 P.;,... 114.11.11.3.. 5 a. o.v6298vaa4.IA. • • S.E. 1/4 SEC. 18, TWP. 23N., ROE SE., W.M. ..... X-e------- ' ;"---....................... ........_.--.......................s....„,............ ....... -.... '...:, ---4-------------....................... ---................,.. , ,r, .•,........ . , ....... ...----- .1 . .•.• ; . I , . ' •AN 0.1 L_ L../ RATOI MR TO I 0 ."1. EMIG CROCE ,-- ..,.•' .,,,,. . •.4,./ I Cr) • p• . ' U..1 ' •"' .PUMP TO DI:01 9.' U.1 • .,,, 9 . V , Ul • aosviie. a .,, , fr , 4, .1d 9 d. TO RERAN GRAPHIC SCALE - _ I Imam.3111 O. .r.,*'...7 w .44 ..,,,- lr.... ,, ..,,,, I.:,, . 01 ' ' .... _. . .9 ..i.\el..0.. . 3 A i U 'we .4.1.0. Y-25-/•E% M ...* 4•1' , + I I it I."... ...r.r I 96298.01 ti • • 0 RV fe9-A-- MU=DE1EETOP < BUSH. ROW& H1TCHINGS. INC. DECK VALVE 2 .o. ' 1/q."' MR V) EIVE EXCRETA'S Et WE SUREVERS c?SW •4,... MATER RN 10 CITY OF RENTON _ _ ' S.: 3RD ST. —.I DEPARTMENT OE ADINAC WEEKS S '''S • N.m .9., SCHEMATIC GRADING &UTILITIES _______ ........_ 1 _ SAFEWAY STORE NO. 1563 i',. COMECT TO - . X... 14•'4' am 2-17-98 RE ARE. m o EAST.INTER .....L.•. , ,,,p 31 ,. Dom PAB PICK°. SO.a. I.=NY ..., wr ...... .....--,...... --- .... 2 - 2 M\MSC\ESEICORC • . • . . I.I V . ....... • ..... Nkrld zioold 1 1 I 413NDVA 4- .. ON\-410 1 1 sn 1V9 a a 0 01 ' • I r 1 1 I I , NAPtieleN 0. ,D , 0 0 0 k. zg2ro 1 raiV•-ia --ii=..isffoigr.....,,, ......., mi c' D nom - it)0,Q or.? 't! NV-Li ao01.1 '''; ‘,. k, ''' E ' ' ,,... ei 0,-60, .... „ _,,_._ ,, , NI .11 .........., mIL r r i „__.1,,...=:„,,, I,,,,, , p.1 = L .....0 1 rib. I - = = 11X "11411111"H 11 . .... 1 -- — ...".." -.C1 I3 I I•-•11 e' (.1 Oa 010 = = e= r :I- JIIIII,,11111 .1 i i " • -. .. ...m:::e. - .,'. F 1 111'.0_-111I1.._".—.„F7.1I1.1. I._—I.4.,., rI1 0 -- Fi "" i Pi Pi -- Pi ri / .C1I,3I• •1 , .•.1k ,\• M. ' '70 4 -: - — — — — — — — — — — — — .--,- -.-- — 1..' Jew 1 li ., • ......-,.0.. v-... ./-4-1.,... 7-•AY ./-4-...e, ..;...1 •t,'..4 ..V....05\ ...V.'Al IV"..s. 01-' -..o.. IV''..... A7-7.a... ..I-'.... .-.V..... - •...., r — 1 1— —, 4 j :1 17 17 17 17 17 17 /7 17 1-7 17 17 17- 17 1-7 i-- i _ ED ....,._,_ 1 i at ; li -; ;— ;— ;— ;— ;— •=1 I— i`-= i-s . t‘-- I— i'.-= 1— 1 —ill) - e _ — — 7-- - e c b N. 5> . , <5 . I I 7.1 .......7 y .-.-, .-. .--.- ...- .....-. - ........ ..1,-. i .- • • ...A... ......, •-•-• •-•-• 1l 10.1..V Il r' .„.. II 7 1 1 ,f k - i Fa ... f. urban02.10% 1!.EVE-aN.4 11 ,4 . K . 1,•+, oreloa we*k,Ave vAv..... +also...um , ........ 11.11•16•10, i t t 1 ...I... Il I eIII>:„...3 WO i 1 •Emr- at / I I 1 j 1 1 1 L ---- 4 • • ( i _., i _ 11 Int irrgi--1 _____. .. 1-0000 00 ,18991 NNE ill 1 i r------T---- , , 5_ _ ii Lliil IL i ii—r------ IF- •74,7-• __•dellirj: 1 (j1 —I , l'i; 1--s, , , , - 2 i0 .1-[1111:@nnli,44,1_,---,--,./1 ,, .,! !! y !! y !! y !! y !! !I! !! !i! !! !I! !! !I! !! S! !! !a!, !! !I r-T-T-T-1 „.. A I AR F-1-+-i--1 . Ill , , rigj f-+-+-+-1 --.- 1.3\ I e -:A --- (A) \ solOre%MOW DT f_.!'"2...!..._. 471.... ........... w......w•— W..)VI AGH a i I = iTIMM ' Lei __ • - - FOOD i DRUG q 3EHE q ----)1 7 .no.=ru• IHEOLL_ _ 9,in m . ..... .7_ ad i MST -•� �... WV re' V O. O OT 1 O SQ1TN ELEVATION w•re Li 4 i « ...ovum ,..r. . ru,a I 7 t t — --_L e _I ---7\. 1 ,_1 _-. OEAST ELEVATION '�•'4' ! — --— 1-J — o j l'T.MfelAWCPPL Cy ';. :: t g_s as.r,ijM y cf,' q i 0 NORM.NATION w•TO I *mem meaner i'l11f 11111111j.J 1lu1u1n11ttl ` I_ e.cJATIQ!! ; 9PLTION4 1 I SITE RAN a.�a !�� APPLIUTIOI }AIdUY - wow- @ F • HI y I, CZ I e. MEET 0 SECTION AT EAST PPOPEXTY LINE w.ra 0 SECTION AT SCUM SRO SWEET w.is I S. 2ND ST. \ S __ r x ee=cs'xs•w - `---- — —_ \1 R \`rac•o. I , .zr ==== S. i* .luo xPARCEL% i.>a).an. w }s oa«. SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPELINE _ I w,r _ ��``` b ` ,x ee,p•xs•xi ,x:.ir 7--________ I I5r x5r x5, ,..,r ".p �J I--- P .b `\\\ \� TONKIN A AR } A' I `� 31.,51 A 0.•9 Z. \ PARCEL I' I VO 5,5v "7.5•", a `1/ PARCEL DATA \, > n s ACCORD B xaoa;,CEL El a B' O ".�. SIX M._ a r a W ,". .5,«A5 I o� I CY W ,n,a n5" PARCEL'1,11wm^ I ^. $i c, rO IIME II.rmm., Mims Sr ..1.9113 II ne. ' Arms, x,.•++:< •,,- R GRAPHIC SCALE sr /- Y Z MT( �.. 13.190 SE I e Wr>R IS ,.„s IMIR :In42 8255 a CARNEY . INTERSTATE "" WENDCO NW CI . R W sFSNA� ..24537 1µ.5.,> rn - s Y 24r,;e8 Sf _ ... 5r -." P)MCELpk C2 ,, C, - SAFEWAYSUS-TOTAL GRESa EAL°' Y,...).,5•,55. XI .pep « PARCEL C-x 2 P FEEL i. F, x.�. �. • C4* ,5.,a3•4n. a,o.. ..w.5i 0.b ao PARCEL rt PARCEL G • rx.5))ap.n. Vol.?o. a 2.61 N,S)pq•4 n a.,on —,i ,..ar 7 I .>•o r PARCEL 0-I mow xw '": ••�• • I DI is 1po.4n. PlmiElnf :, 0.30« MKS PARTENRSHIP �'E , b~;' 4b • .n.,YSr Y 's,�') 4 it DRUGS m I 15•iY ,,..+ • liA KS PARTENRSHIP . s pY FIRST INTERSTATE ` �D 2 ARCEo-x • F. F I o.n s s4' PARCEL R • e - -- _E _ 0.... •A I TN ....,.,, ,A •<1 yb+i ;d . ,` T , PARCEL E J -_ 'u�.w.4T 11 CUSTOM VIM.16 ",ar 1R172,247 I a; 277 60' �� - - S. 3RD ST. R •� \ - - t-- - - - wR.", x — I HDR Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. SAFEWAY CORPORATION ....Vs SAFEWAY ,b,:,, ------111 Consulting C^91^•• Mo^• =^e a^•r^� RENTON CBD MASTER PLAN I«... IIC.•,u-xs:s �— �� 74TE• 6u1Du1G Oa LncS TRAP FOR 142A ',GP&I 4/25;.c. n1-1 m f # 0 wi O I S. 2ND ST. ••• • . i# _ I I.. III + F h N a b I USE PE' AREA ,s T 1 ,I .�` `�`I PROJECT INFORMATION ' - CSYf ' ' . \ \ \ I PROJECT. MKI ilnTn .y LLL------...--JJJ _--.— _ I. NOT A PART OY1ER: (2001.48-.64 4p b, EXISTING LOT USE. �/1J • v �`I71111=".._ •. ' 71 / %�1 Ri : ::..- PRaPosED USES ,.e.rre..T.. (la ` , x '-I • c I �I.Y '� �� RTINC ZONING: ra.ac0K A°mpA.GA W EI°sM —It-.- I I t �� - •1 jL - J .. In r - .�._�__�`! —_._.__—.. BUILDING AREA: llrl LOT COVERAGE: MI 10.4.15 • _a----'°---- �!i -R(.: !,;_I - � �� = .'� i - r11- '_� PARKING REQUIRED: .a.,m.r MOCO mv.rn / p,/ SAFEKAY.1%3(WSSl I I I =AL''.•� I ` IIDED: STAKAA0 Ye I`,011) ..1 1i t I ~-'•i� - ~—RIB TYPICAL STALL DIMENSIONS: COMA., r� •c E°SLNG fl I I i _ C, ,- wBfpu .% /, , r PARKING LANDSCAPE: . /- I -r I : Nor A PART i wle....... .N,m �" WOO SP " GENE'S REST(Mt.NTf BUILDING NEIGNT: -"' � I ill _ d ' .�..` SAW CY�. - / -- ./I"-' IR�fl1\.pvl i , I'"� ,. �I I BUILDING SETBACKS: air xe.*Mt,01.11.1.1.1 WY S. 3RD ST. NO••.M.Y•UMW NA•••CRISM1 WWI NW%KO WKS SIR MAR m.oN.e N.u.r.. �,ne 11111RA11 • O'""`A" �_ e I I . AO.O CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner/Architects PROJECT NAME: Safeway Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 203 South Second Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $59,669.25 (795.59 trips x $75 = $59,669.25). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner/Architects PROJECT NAME: Safeway Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 203 South Second Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Site monitoring by geotechnical engineer required. UBC 1994 edition applies. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 GPM. This requires five fire hydrants and a looped fire main installed around the building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed building and the other four hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. PLAN REVIEW Surface Water-The surface water drainage system and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required for new impervious surfaces (more than 5,000 sq. ft.) subject to vehicular use. Surface water(SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface are required. Sewer-The site will be required to connect to existing sewer mains located in South 2nd Street (12 inch) and South 3rd Street (8 inch) by new side sewer connections with permit fees at $80/connection. All on-site food preparation areas will require grease trap/interceptor meeting current UPC codes/standards. Wastewater (SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Water-New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (building fire control system)will be required and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of all new proposed buildings on site. New water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults and water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City. Water(SDC)fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Streets -Existing street improvements are in place (curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, street lights) on all adjacent streets. New proposed driveways will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards. POLICE 4 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually(in Addition) Safeway Development/LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H Advisory Notes (Continued) Page2of2 Construction Phase Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city, especially in the south end. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Completed Building The most common occurring crime at shopping centers such as this, is theft from motor vehicle and shoplifting. With the amount of parking that you are providing, this is also going to be a high-risk target area for car prowlers. It is suggested that extra security lighting be provided for the safety and security of customers shopping at this store. Undercover security is advised to assist with shoplifting detection. Once construction is complete, it is recommended that No Trespassing signs be displayed throughout the parking lot with the same verbiage that is indicated on the attached flier. This is considered a "first warning"to trespassers, and if police have to be called they can enforce at their initial arrival. It's important to direct any and all foot traffic into the main front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business. This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. Any other exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. All doors should have peepholes installed to assist in easy identification of anyone outside the facility. Proper security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the walkways, and in the rear and side of the building as well. All areas for loading and unloading need to be properly lit for the safety of customers and employees. It is recommended that the building have a monitored security alarm installed, with all doors leading to the outside having the words"Alarmed Door" in red lettering, at least 6" in height placed on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. This location has had problems in the past with transients living in the wooded area west of the current Safeway building. It would be important to post this area with No Trespassing signs as well. AIRPORT This site is situated directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway. The use is considered compatible with aviation operations on and from the airport. PLANNING 1. The applicant will require the approval of the Seattle Public Utility for any work (including landscaping and utilities) conducted within the 66 foot right-of-way adjacent to South 2nd Street. 2. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 3. The Environmental Review Committee recommends a site plan condition that the applicant extend the screen wall to further mitigate noise and visual impacts to residents of the apartment buildings located to the east of the site. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `-0N‘S1Vll.C41,0y\ semi ice. COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings(total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. RONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of he Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environmer t Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreli le Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLIC Y-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS � m o IU o if (7 e c}T e 6-j1 We have Ned this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. C ( 2 /8 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP2.DOC Rev.10/93 3 / 4 .. evY- -- ,,, • +* )+ 1 Airdirilf:fit:: ;,:. • . r. 2, •„/ -'~'»r't- t,. .r-»,�.•,c......,. . .— -- .,y „ ,... , , 1 > "�I0�11�` E <•.7., wY ry'< .a roves.-..r-..w.....ww+r.+.w..i.wsxr...,ne13•.,vr»a...M....x.. s.».n.... ,x+a+.M,i...a.mw..ww,hv..+..� CA.,* _ 4 Project Name powvt 1,v uv'vl 5a-fe(,t)G((� Project Address 5 2-Act St d Lecke Yt✓:✓ • Contact Person f?.t(.14 (,Ua ci vie v J Address Phone Number ('4 2 5 ) - )i J I-I - 0 5 Permit Number L-v4 - R)3 - 0 5 Z Project Description R f/e e./X/51liv,, s knp�)iu, ccvtlt1. u_)7 Iu�� ) c�;:.64, O I { I Gk;571,:t, SA .F.cl;tc:; - 76. 'A 5.4 4 Ke'.z tul 1 j - 1 , 326 5.�. J I IV e c-c) =7 Safr.c )ac) - 66, 30() s? d pc-rc 1 / - 1(9, 775 s.f . Land Use Type: Method o Calculation: ., VrvL (�3'�0) ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual I`0•`l l ) 1000-ft 0/Retail 0 Traffic Study 2 `'Iv ev;rvrcc�r ❑ Non-retail 0 Other ! I�cL(U1 l (`?20) - 75.6,2 pi_ 1000-# Calculation: ax151"-9 c/{a1Il1 primarii ley; = r(2(,553)(1.5.9n -► (17,32 )(05.62)1 (0,25') - IIL'f . -N. tI'1e5 Pry usrc It. pvIWI(*vt try:, 1 S r i ] (0.7_5) .- I c(l. O. 3 S. t► ) Ne—t ftc U) 0614 P(;rvsco' t,-./ 3 = ((q o, 3 ) - ( I I('. . ) - 1,15 - 5 e/ L v?Pi. . Fl- `�75 � a 1 t't Its I rip (7 15. 5q) C 75 ) _(_ se,, 66q . 2_ - Transportation Mitigation Fee: 5q , 6 (q- 25 ---; Calculated by: i/&bf Oiie//7) Date: 1 /71 18 Account Number: 1`0 4q-31-0 7070 `` -- Date of Payment • • City. nton Department of Planning/Building/Pt.. _ _Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pc PC, COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings(total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet Y�$ 14,000 Feet art) This site is situated directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway. Height restrictions may affect the permitted building heights. This area should be designated as compatible with airport operations and the operation of aircraft on and from the airport. The use is considered compatible with aviation operations on and from the airport. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The area should be designated as compatible use within the airport runway approach. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS None We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infon�o ' needed to properly assess this proposal. (A I to, tg98' Signature of 'rector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP2.D0 Rev.10/93 City.. on Department of Planning/Building/P, . .._rks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (erg COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings(total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C �YJG✓/lf/! �UDa� , 'Zl�3 o� t2 � 142P. - .44-247U5 / VI A-72.2ske,c mceozcx�,� � ran vr?t %a cf�tEc� a arc st� y 4 -xo- a9 Gc7 - zb .mac '91/2elo7‘2e_, t�cz/ten /7.7a)f ..P tea- -, 7'he 02 a c /a C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ' G74-c a/21 c / 49 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dale DEVAPP2.DOC Rev.10/93 (CY 0 CITY OF RENTON �~A FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Safeway 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. * 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building: 66,575 square feet x $0.52 = $34,619 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. The applicant may be able to reduce or eliminate the fire mitigation fees if the square footage of the existing buildings that are demolished is made available to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. CXi S!/;.tn kiui ua/'c �o o/ c A c oleos, SJe4 is CT:ct 6412/2 5 dr"e. Ycel, 4e /11 7" 1614 Ccc is .�ase'd apt AalOt p o �•C��eKC�. safeway ,,,,�� / / l etio.i ccc �Jase,/ on a2,s ! sitar �ce . �ccc �oe 5/7/9( Cl- City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: MAY 19, 1998 Application No.:LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated May 05, 1998: Applicant: Bayless Brand Wagner Architects Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Safeway Development Work Order No: 78380 Location: 203 South Second Street Site Area: 5.5 acres Building Area(gross): 44,214 sq. ft. Building Area(New expansion gross):66,575 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Existing street improvements are in place (curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, street lights) on all adjacent streets. New proposed driveways will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards and be approved per location by the Transportation Division. A traffic mitigation fee of$75/daily trip in/out of the site will be required. ,� ,,,jdNit,(5` 5--/y-w Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date h:safeway3 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: MAY 19, 1998 Application No.:LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated May 05, 1998: Applicant: Bayless Brand Wagner Architects Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Safeway Development Work Order No: 78380 Location: 203 South Second Street Site Area: 5.5 acres Building Area(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. Building Area(New expansion gross):66,575 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments SURFACE WATER: The surface water drainage system and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the city of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (more than 5,000 sq. ft) of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on the site. Surface water (SDC) fees of $0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface installed by the project on site. WASTEWATER: The site will be required to connect to existing sewer mains located in South 2nd Street (12") and South 3rd Street (8") by new side sewer connections with permit fees at $80/connection. All on-site food preparation areas will require grease trap/interceptor meeting current UPC Codes/Standards. Wastewater(SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. , J, 6-64-98 Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative Date - h:safewayl City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Plan Review/Water Comments Due: MAY 19, 1998 Application No.:LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated May 05, 1998: Applicant: Bayless Brand Wagner Architects Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Safeway Development Work Order No: 78380 Location: 203 South Second Street Site Area: 5.5 acres Building Area(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. Building Area(New expansion gross):66,575 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments WATER: New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (building fire control system) will be required and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of all new proposed buildings on site. New water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults and water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City. Water (SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. s/y-y8 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date h:safeway2 _ ...n Tres ass itsciAecelaztato BUSINESS En f o rc e m e n t WATCH Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. ' Y r� COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT • � • CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 235- 2571 ,---)\--.. ..1._Litil . L Lz,,, IscA 1.__Li \ foki: 1:1E113 Li: 10 ' 42 co - —__ c _ • -4. i• CA \ IL(P) t$ pi L11 _E3 3rd • ' -I . --"1 iz ,L--, -r1I--:.7t''.--.i,._-r-iT)q=c7-.---_----_I1\!.-fz.>6.)r• ....1.;__ -: --1--- E. . T 1 \D P-1 › = iW0ti I— P --i.,.... ---.- •>. li) i ..,-........-.-...... __ _ .1x..9. 7 S 1 LA Airport Way 03 Ce , 1-- •.."-.R.-_-,8 R-8 I i [ - . __, •....\\. 1 , 1 , , , , ,..., 1 , 1 - '•- ,',, ... 1- STR4Theilt/i4"la,ti ----,' il ',R,i1 11 I I' ilj, 'OD I : RM-U e RENTON 077 MOMS \\................ me• J -.....',-.._ — • i •i-- •... errs or PROPOSED YEi. i I 4) °CD M:1-1 ai t -- 4 C D(P) ocraornarr > 9, E RM-U RN- - ) ..4 16 iy ...R110 .C, Ell i 42d S. k C A 6 RETAIL 151 -' 0: . n H --- . S /34th 1.7_77 I 1 NEW SAFEWAY ioz -' SI., CO HINTON 1 4 trfi 0 __ &3dd'Sireet Air S 2nd St. r , s 2nd Str."- , ow CD k:...'12)qiii"t7 i i cpt,,°11 1 Sitliut :- cA-?8:9: -; R.,0,/i:.--_. 3--, ..n ,1\11li:iit .1t0.v.41iR1,11p1s-., 1°,\ : •0- ! sC, Ad SStr-e;leIt aIIr 96l„)... 1.*.—.., CP._1;9g2?i i --ir, & u 3144. CA ) - . _ S i.„Dr.. :, *k.••izo>.e,••.- 4 7.123 CD CD D 1C' - CD --- Ill. •icrrn ' - CA CD CO - __ 17/1 , ria* -- - Gv\ ''.<' \''% CD n- CD thi 4.• ' Rg/ 155 5th pz RM-14, •A ' - . , R M--I- ?c, .,:'''CA A-- .....--- ...41_6...E.11. ;. if . C1X .. . U./....... ._._ . SV . • - ... --.- , . 1 1 m -1 ix --•.;•-• -7,-- 0--. .--1-..— ..... ,-- -EL- . • . •-• • _ . S .6-h - - --,_____ s -1. --.-__• ..- 144-U ' De 1 IM -r. :'7.-.—- - - CA ilk i W , CO 4. 1 // CA RI , c's 7-etc: . i I- •-•.- - , — -..., ... ........1 , 1 Cry7- , rs., z. , .l.. ..• cni. II ' I _ _ ll I i \C\ I I NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 11 1 _J ..., — A0.1 3330 Island Crest Way Mercer Island , WA 98040 June 18 , 1998 City of Renton Mr. Peter Rosen , Project Manager Development Services Division A +�^. 200 Mill Avenue South a3,11 038 Renton, WA 98040 9661 6 Nnr Re: Safeway Development N01N38J0,113 LUA-9 8-0 5 2 ,EC F ,SA-Fi JNINNb+Id 1N3Wd01 �a Dear Mr. Rosen, We are owners of the apartment property at the S .W. corner of the intersection of Shattuck Avenue S . & South Second Avenue, called Magnuson Court . We purchased this property , consisting of 32 units in two 2-story buildings in April of 1989 . When we acquired the property , we found that the proximity of the existing Safeway store, the then-existing A&H Drugstore , and other nearby amenities , made the location ideal for , and had attracted, long term senior-citizen residents (typically in their 80 ' s ) . We immediately determined to maintain that situation by adopting those policies and procedures necessary to establish "an exemption from the provisions of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 relating to familial status in order to provide housing for older persons" . This effectively created a senior- citizen residence . We have not regretted that decision and have enjoyed our senior residents a great deal . Our residents are accustomed to shop at the present Safeway, and then simply push a shopping cart across the parking lot , through a gate on our west property line and to their door . The proposed site layout , as I read it , will preclude that access and require our people to go out to Shattuck, then down Second Avenue , a much longer route for an older person with a shopping cart. We would like to suggest that convenient access from our West line be main- tained to allow our residents to continue their present shopping pattern. Another concern is the two loading, trash and compactor locations essentially adjacent to our property. These facilities often generate a great deal of noise and we are concerned that residents could be disturbed by early morning or late night activities . We would appreciate an investigation of the possibility of relocating or enclosing these facilities . It seems that the design decision to 'wrap ' the structure tightly around the southwest corner of our property was very unfortunate from our point of view. The existence of a 27 foot high structure immediately adjacent to our south and west property lines , when our buildings are located close to these lines , is not an appealing_ prospect . We are concerned that the shading, overbearing presence and the visual appearance may produce a very negative impact . Some mitigation of this problem could be accomplished by moving the structure away from our property a little (our south building wall appears to be but 19 feet from the high wall ) , adding design fea- tures (eg . texture, horizontal lines , alcoves, etc. ) and certainly using a light color finish might help. We really appre- ciate the intent to landscape the intervening space and would appreciate more, and perhaps taller , screening. Incidentl_y , how can a gardener maintain a photinia hedge with only a 5 foot wide slot to work in? Finally, we are sure that all involved are aware of the soil conditions in this area . Our buildings have experienced some settling since they were built in 1949 and we are concerned that adjacent heavy construction activity might create ground vibration that would cause further damage. The developer should be made aware of this concern so that construction practices can be adopted with this in mind. We do intend to have a Building Inspection professional establish a baseline condition in case subsequent damage should occur. It is our hope that your office can work with the project archi- tects to develop means to lessen our concerns so that when the project is completed we will be able to view the new complex as a desirable neighbor . Mr . Rosen, thank you for your time and courtesy in providing us information on this proposal . Your explanations were most helpful . We appreciate also being made a party of record in this matter . ncer _1 , Joe and Lyn Lightfoot Page 2 re Safeway Development �' k. �: 0$ a, - 77R-Zacr9 �' z ai 7 n DEVELOPMENT PLANNING a, „�i ' CITY OF RENTON w 01% o� JUN 0 9 1998 RECEIVED * ''''l:,.4.'4( )-)71W)? -e/r2 .erip' Jj 72.6 -. ,-.g.i...'-.,.- :''''''''L.- ali)eezi___-1-4 74:-:- _6(111r: e-ali-tiel-1 .- -1-8.---. C72- :1:4'4:41i,,;-' -'41/}42-14:41'11d-4/)2eiteir-12-i A2e4 6'2 vO t // ,!i/, d_24-Cnl r�Q J �'�,Gtl ee Qi -12�6� f �a fJ>7GY Q�Oc�%'1-tangy c &e % C L .1 C2iu,, a} ipp�• 4 (/ 4/ -Al2.‘„44. ,9 ceoi ,,„,-_,,,,,,e. � � cy�. d fn u -e- ae4::%eyfra,txcitt" ez, AT cold ao c 0 �0 G �, ..„. .,..„,,. % „., AA,...1t..„,_,, <-...,raii.„4...)ordH,,...„ , „44.7��,. ' ...,,,,..... ,,,,,•... • CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On tha day of IlkNt, , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United State;, a sealed envelope containing ERL Aek.roi tw docurlents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Depart ment of Ecology Don H irter WSDOT KC Wz stewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David =. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirle:,Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwarnish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jz inga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) Savvdrai, iery.r STAT E OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING )I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that._ g17c/414 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated-7t 5, / �i�1 �zcf Ge ,� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) \RILYN KAMCHEFF My appointment x fires: Project Name: safetub4 DevelopW‘tht Project Number: LuPt 0 . O St r eLf- SW •{4 NOTARY.)OC %,o CITI DF RENTON bell ' \ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June )98 Washingto,i State Departmer t of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47 703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitte J herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed tr y the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on June 02, 1998: DE TERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED SP FEWAY DEVELOPMENT/LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the bu 'dings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two dri reways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. Location: 203 South Second Street. Comment:; regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasons bly available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional nformation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 235-2719. For the En''ironmental Review Committee, eA2_,\ Peter Rose n Project Ma lager cc: Kir g County Wastewater Treatment Division Lai ry Fisher, Department of Fisheries Da✓id F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Do i Hurter, Department of Transportation Sh rley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities DuNamish Tribal Office Roi Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Jo(! Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTRUOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 (i)This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 6 "--) CITX OF RENTON a Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 04, 998 Mr. Kevin Barber Baylis Bra nd Wagner Architects 10801 Main Street, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Safeway Development Project No. LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H Dear Mr. Barber: This lette is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completes their review of the subject project. The ERC, on June 02, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Commen's regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. Ar y aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:30 PM June 22, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in wr ting together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 30, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be meiiled to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rig its more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (42!) 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: M & Mrs. Joe Lightfoot/Party of Record &+feway, Inc./Owners Enclosure DNSMLTR.0 DC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner/Architects PROJECT NAME: Safeway Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 203 South Second Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at$59,669.25 (795.59 trips x $75 = $59,669.25). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLI CATION NO(S): LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H APPLI CANT: Baylis Brand Wagner/Architects PROJECT NAME: Safeway Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west F>art of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 203 South Second Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The fi►flowing notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appevl process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Site rr onitoring by geotechnical engineer required. UBC 1994 edition applies. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 GPM. This requires five fire hydrants and a looped fire main installed around the building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed building and the other four h idrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. PLAN REVIEW Surfa:e Water-The surface water drainage system and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required for new impervious surfaces (more than 5,000 sq. ft.) subject to vehicular use. Surface water(SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface are required. Sewe -The site will be required to connect to existing sewer mains located in South 2nd Street (12 inch) and South 3rd Street (8 inch) by new side sewer connections with permit fees at$80/connection. All on-site food prepa ation areas will require grease trap/interceptor meeting current UPC codes/standards. Wastewater (SDC; fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Water -New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (building fire control system)will be requir3d and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of all new proposed buildings on site. New water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults and water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City. Water(SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be requir3d. Street s - Existing street improvements are in place (curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, street lights) on all adjacent street, . New proposed driveways will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards. POLIGE 4 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually (in Addition) Safeway Development/LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 2 of 2 Construction Phase Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city, especially in the south end. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Completed Building The most common occurring crime at shopping centers such as this, is theft from motor vehicle and shoplifting. With the amount of parking that you are providing, this is also going to be a high-risk target area for car prowlers. It is suggested that extra security lighting be provided for the safety and security of customers shopping at this store. Undercover security is advised to assist with shoplifting detection. Once construction is complete, it is recommended that No Trespassing signs be displayed throughout the parking lot with the same verbiage that is indicated on the attached flier. This is considered a "first warning"to trespassers, and if police have to be called they can enforce at their initial arrival. It's important to direct any and all foot traffic into the main front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business. This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. Any other exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. All doors should have peepholes installed to assist in easy identification of anyone outside the facility. Proper security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the walkways, and in the rear and side of the building as well. All areas for loading and unloading need to be properly lit for the safety of customers and employees. It is recommended that the building have a monitored security alarm installed, with all doors leading to the outside having the words"Alarmed Door" in red lettering, at least 6" in height placed on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. This location has had problems in the past with transients living in the wooded area west of the current Safeway building. It would be important to post this area with No Trespassing signs as well. AIRPORT This site is situated directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway. The use is considered compatible with aviation operations on and from the airport. PLANNING 1. The applicant will require the approval of the Seattle Public Utility for any work (including landscaping and utilities) conducted within the 66 foot right-of-way adjacent to South 2nd Street. 2. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 3. The Environmental Review Committee recommends a site plan condition that the applicant extend the screen wall to further mitigate noise and visual impacts to residents of the apartment buildings located to the east of the site. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner/Architects PROJECT NAME: Safeway Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 203 South Second Street LEAD AC ENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.0 30(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Commerts regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review :3upervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: June 08, 1998 DATE Or DECISION: June 02, 1998 SIGNATURES: 14P11�1 . . J q� l Gregg Zi �r erm , Administrator DAE De artm(ent of Planning/Building/Public Works p - —f gm hastain, Administrate DATE Community Se ices Leeeler, Fire Chief DATE Re ton Fire Department DNSMSIG.HOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner/Architects PROJECT NAME: Safeway Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part cf the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 203 South Second Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $59,669.25 (795.59 trips x $75 = $59,669.25). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner/Architects PROJECT NAME: Safeway Development DE:>CRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second StrE et, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 203 South Second Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: Tim following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Sit( monitoring by geotechnical engineer required. UBC 1994 edition applies. FIF E 1. l'he preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 GPM. This requires five fire hydrants and a looped fire main installed around the building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed building and the other four hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. PLAN REVIEW Surface Water-The surface water drainage system and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required for new impervious surfaces (more than 5,000 sq. ft.) subject to vehicular use. Surface water(SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface are required. Sewer-The site will be required to connect to existing sewer mains located in South 2nd Street (12 inch) and South 3rd Street (8 inch) by new side sewer connections with permit fees at $80/connection. All on-site food preparation areas will require grease trap/interceptor meeting current UPC codes/standards. Wastewater (SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Water-New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (building fire control system) will be reo uired and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of all new proposed buildings on site. Ne v water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults and water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City. Water(SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be rec uired. Stieets -Existing street improvements are in place (curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, street lights) on all adjacent strets. New proposed driveways will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards. PC LICE 4 F olice Calls for Service Estimated Annually (in Addition) Safeway Development/LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 2 of 2 Construction Phase Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city, especially in the south end. To F rotect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not i1 use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Gla1 s windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. Completed Building The most common occurring crime at shopping centers such as this, is theft from motor vehicle and shoplifting. Witt the amount of parking that you are providing, this is also going to be a high-risk target area for car prov'lers. It is suggested that extra security lighting be provided for the safety and security of customers shopping at this store. Undercover security is advised to assist with shoplifting detection. Onc a construction is complete, it is recommended that No Trespassing signs be displayed throughout the parking lot with the same verbiage that is indicated on the attached flier. This is considered a "first warning"to tres )assers, and if police have to be called they can enforce at their initial arrival. It's important to direct any and all foot traffic into the main front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business. This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of a I visitors. Any other exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary lock ng devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. All doors should have peepholes installed to assist in easy identification of anyone outside the facility. Proper security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the walkways, and in the rear and side of the wilding as well. All areas for loading and unloading need to be properly lit for the safety of customers and emt:loyees. It is recommended that the building have a monitored security alarm installed, with all doors leading to the outside having the words "Alarmed Door" in red lettering, at least 6" in height placed on the outside of each doo•to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. Lan iscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. This location has had problems in the past with transients living in the wooded area west of the currnt Safeway building. It would be important to post this area with No Trespassing signs as well. AIR3ORT Thi: site is situated directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway. The use is considered corr patible with aviation operations on and from the airport. PL./ NNING 1. -'he applicant will require the approval of the Seattle Public Utility for any work (including landscaping and utilii ies) conducted within the 66 foot right-of-way adjacent to South 2nd Street. 2. garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling truc,cs. 3. -.he Environmental Review Committee recommends a site plan condition that the applicant extend the scre en wall to further mitigate noise and visual impacts to residents of the apartment buildings located to the eas of the site. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON Tt e Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - M tigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H Environmental review for proposed redevelopment of the existing Safeway shopping center. Location: 203 South Second Street. Tt e 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal pE riods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on June 22, 1998. Written comments shall be forwarded to th Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the m tigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at th Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Bt ilding. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 30, 1998 at 9:00 Alto consider the Site Approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will bE heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Pt blication Date: June 08, 1998 Ac count No. 51067 dn:mpub.dot s Io1'cE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING POST ED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-052,ECF,SA-H Proposa for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.)with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site,with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier.Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the building:;toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two drivewa!s off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street,and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy'; restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. Location: 203 South Second Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE P- OPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONME T. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if the Environmen al Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, INA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional inforr cation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. A Public Hearin.; will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of amity Hall, Renton, Washington, on June 30, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed tc you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of his public hearing. i_ I rel U I \\\ F Q CA \ 2 \\ Airport Way '�� —8 I I --NW-2ndLSt .� I CA S I rliiiR�I3:�.9#E \-- CA I _; 17'iI I RM.0 �� cA ST7`p�iin�t, ,�� (7 i A CD � _i �A > II I j Pve R-D R-n R-1D i CD(P) `__ '& znd CAS MEWWM..' T ° CA ; ' CA _____4--,-- _ ____,—--- i 5^Yr''4)n,t .1. o f cD .1 =— R 8 _-h . cpepr.CDC :GAD_: L8n R-10 .[CA - Jam' >>, ,c` A-810 "': I L. Ic��I EIM In,t2 CO I CI CA CAS'3r&P E -{er .. — O`'e'-• CD On co sl CD C= CD S S ffl7 S I CA .� 'i � d. ' CA CD CD CD CD D CD CD 1 ./4-- 24...> ,„,, s ti\, :, , Ili fit ,R1,4_, v... CA 26 FOR FURT-ER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)235-2550. . DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Pl17ae include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC iYIEETING DATE June 2, 1998 Project Name Safeway Development Applic ant Baylis, Brand, Wagner Architects File Number LUA-098-052, ECF, SA-H Project Manager Peter Rosen Project Description Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq. ft.) with a new 56,300 sq. ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq. ft. of attached retail space. The proposed building would be located on the east part of the site, with the front facade oriented west facing toward Rainier Avenue South. The existing buildings are located on the west part of the site with the back of the buildings toward Rainier Avenue South. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. Project Location 203 South Second Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf 44,214 sq. ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 66,575 sq. ft. Site A*ea 263,900 s.f., 6.06 acres Total Building Area gsf 66,575 s.f. RECC MMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated. _1 u �_ ._ - Airport Way —8 / _NiW-t_rittl St ✓ I I I CA!I I S I IIV1fit ,�'"its. - - j ill I o-I C.'A I n,_I I ! IR1 in 1 kl -tin RM-_ 1i P1tl + nton t I I (1 R-e;I I -la «► W V1 t a CCA 1 1 _ SITE OF PROPOSED �=. DEVELOPMENT �„� f,W 2n S a C�0��]j CDCP) RETAIL ;t' 'T- .. _. r" �LII .SAFEWAY eLE - 1 RENTOR 1 t-- _. ..._. —. i, CA Q _ J CITY LIMITS--..i ----- ) S 2nd St. r-1 - _-C_C'1 5.2 nd- ``I �, Sss tpt E1- .-T- _ - - . _ BCD — 1 I_I I '._ Rn R-10 — y co ,� ,CDC =dD= CD a __= C A = a; ---- Rs l @ to. 'D. i r- i I cr I GD12 cD_ I_�i� . ��I �1 I CA ,,,�c 9 ..- C s1 13'rd t Pl. 3 -_ _. -_ ci SJpse \ CD E9 CD►, cD g CD CD J�W CD1ji CD GD D CDProject L ocation Map �, c - ERCRPTDOC RM—I a 'rn \,71:; -------1 - - A61 "11'.; I. 1'. i ' City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmi Review Committee Staff Report SAFEWAYDEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H REPORT DR JUNE 2, 1998 Page 2 of 6 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 15 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 15 da A..eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 15 day Appeal Period. followed by a 15 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $59,669.25 (795.59 trips x$75 = $59,669.25). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Site me nitoring by geotechnical engineer required. UBC 1994 edition applies. FIRE 1. The lareliminary fire flow required is 5,000 GPM. This requires five fire hydrants and a looped fire main installed around the building. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed building and the other four hydrants within 200 feet of the building. 2. An a:)proved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. PLAN REVIEW Surface Water-The surface water drainage system and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Biofiltration will be required for new impervious surfaces (more than 5,000 sq. ft.) subject to vehicular use. Surface water(SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface are required. Sewer •The site will be required to connect to existing sewer mains located in South 2nd Street (12 inch) and South 3rd Street (8 inch) by new side sewer connections with permit fees at $80/connection. All on-site food preparation areas v ill require grease trap/interceptor meeting current UPC codes/standards. Wastewater(SDC) fees of $0.078)sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Water• New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (building fire control system) will be required and mist meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of all new proposed buildings on site. New water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults and water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements ERCRPT DOC I City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environs 91 Review Committee Staff Report SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H REPOR-"OF JUNE 2, 1998 Page 3 of 6 that will be held by the City. Water(SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. Street:-; -Existing street improvements are in place (curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, street lights) on all adjacent streets New proposed driveways will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards. POLICE 4 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually(in Addition) Construction Phase Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city, especially in the south end. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demorstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also i ecommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under constriction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandal izing or stealing building materials. Compl ated Building The m)st common occurring crime at shopping centers such as this, is theft from motor vehicle and shoplifting. With the arr ount of parking that you are providing, this is also going to be a high-risk target area for car prowlers. It is sugge,ted that extra security lighting be provided for the safety and security of customers shopping at this store. Under over security is advised to assist with shoplifting detection. Once i:onstruction is complete, it is recommended that No Trespassing signs be displayed throughout the parking lot with the same verbiage that is indicated on the attached flier. This is considered a "first warning"to trespassers, and if police have to be called they can enforce at their initial arrival. It's important to direct any and all foot traffic into the main front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business. This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. Any other exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. All doors should have peepholes installed to assist in easy identification of anyone outside the facility. Prope security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the walkways, and in the rear and side of the buildir g as well. All areas for loading and unloading need to be properly lit for the safety of customers and emplo gees. It is recommended that the building have a monitored security alarm installed, with all doors leading to the outside having the words "Alarmed Door" in red lettering, at least 6" in height placed on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. This locatic n has had problems in the past with transients living in the wooded area west of the current Safeway building. AIRPORT This site is situated directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway. The use is considered compatible with aviation operations on and from the airport. PLANNING 1. Th applicant will require the approval of the Seattle Public Utility for any work (including landscaping and utilities) condu::ted within the 66 foot right-of-way adjacent to South 2nd Street. 2. Gs rbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 3. Th.: Environmental Review Committee recommends a site plan condition that the applicant extend the screen wall to furt ter mitigate noise and visual impacts to residents of the apartment buildings located to the east of the site. ERCRF T.DOC City of F'enton P/8/PW Department Environm Review Committee Staff Report SAFEW A Y DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF JUNE 2, 1998 Page 4 of 6 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In cornoliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impact!: The subject site is generally flat. There are small depression areas in the center of the site with grade changes of approximately 5 feet. The west part of the site is presently developed with the Safeway store, three other retail buildings, and parking areas. Approximately 3.18 acres of the 5.50 acre site is presently impervious. Accordi lg to the geotechnical engineering report, fill depths of three to ten feet overlay native soils consisting of varying deposits of silty sand, poorly graded sand, and poorly graded gravel. The report states that the propose d structures may be supported by conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on at least two feet of structural fill. Slab-on-grade foundations may be supported on at least one foot of structural fill. The environ rental checklist estimates that the proposal would require approximately 7,000 cubic yards of cut and 6,500 c ibic yards of fill material. No source of the fill material is listed in the environmental checklist. Erosion could result with clearing and grading activities. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Codes\ihich require the applicant to provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and require a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: NA. 2) Air Impacts Impacts to air quality can be anticipated during construction and after occupancy of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) from di iturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction equipment exhaust would have a minor impact on local air quality. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from customer and employee traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 3) Water Impacts There are no surface water bodies nor wetlands on the site or in the immediate vicinity of the site. The subject site is outside of designated shoreline areas. The proposal would result in an increase in impervious surface coverage, approximately 95% of the site would be covered with buildings and parking when the proposed development is complete. Stormwater runoff from the parking lot and driveway areas would be collected and routed to an underground detention vault which is sized to provide dead storage for water quality treatment. The discharge from the detention vault would go into an existing 24 inch storm drain running southwest across the site. Runoff from the building roof would be collected and discharged directly into the 24 inch storm drain since water quality control is not required for roof areas. The total discharge from the site would be designed so that peak flows will be either equal to or less than the existing peak flow rates. The stormwater system will be required to meet the standards of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as adopted by the City. ERCRPT.)OC City of Penton P/B/PW Department Environmi Review Committee Staff Report SAFEW AY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF JUNE 2, 1998 Page 5 of 6 Mitigati)n Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Ilexus NA 4) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction, with credit given for the square foot area of existing buildinc s on the site. If the existing buildings to be demolished are 44,212 square feet and the new constru.lion totals 66,575 square feet, the mitigation fee would be based on 22,363 square feet of new constru;tion and is estimated to be $11,628.76. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Plexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 5) Transportation Impact: Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street, one driveway off South Second Street, and a driveway shared with the existing Wendy's restaurant providing access off Rainier Avenue South. Transpc rtation staff has approved the location of the driveways. The driveways will be required to meet the design standards of the code. The ph)posal would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. The proposal is given credit for the existing shopping center and the traffic mitigation fee is based on the number of new, additional daily traffic trips expected. City staff has estimated that the project would generate a total of 795.59 new average daily trips. Therefore, the Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $59,669.25 (795.59 trips x$75 = $59,669.25). The ap)licant has not submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan to discuss the hauling and transportation routes t) the site. This will be required prior to construction or building permits. Construction-related truck traffic c Duld impact traffic flows if occurring during AM or PM peak traffic flows. Truck hauling hours are limited l o between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance. Mitigaticn Measures The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each averagE daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $59,669.25 (795.59 trips x $75 = $59,669.25). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Policy I\exus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance 6) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts_ The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and the proposed retail uses are primary permitted uses allowed in the CA zoning designation. The proposal is consistent with adopted zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is outside designated shoreline areas. There are two existing apartment buildings located directly northeast of the subject site. The proposed Safeway building is setback approximately 5 feet from the property lines abutting the apartments. The back of the building and a parking area would face toward the apartments. The truck loading area and trash compactor are located on the back, east side of the building. The proposal includes a screen wall and a landscape strip to minimize impacts to the adjacent apartments. The subject site is located directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway. Building heights are restrictei to 69 feet in elevation to avoid penetration of reserved air space surfaces. The proposed building height is a maximum of 36 feet above the finished ground surface and 69 feet in elevation. The proposed use is considered compatible with aviation operations. Mitigatic n Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Al exus NA ERCRPT. )OC ' City of Fenton P/B/PW Department Environm Review Committee Staff Report SAFEW AY DEVELOPMENT LUA-98-052, ECF, SA-H REPORT OF JUNE 2, 1998 Page 6 of 6 Mitigati)n Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The pn)posa1 has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applica ble, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Envirc.nmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determ nation must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors o law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the ti ne of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environ'rental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a fo mal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land U:e Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98C 55. Envirc nmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM June 22, 1998. If no ap)eals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the requirec $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional informa ion regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ERCRPT.I)OC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CovNitAtc4tirA sejAi itrA COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATIOI J: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMAR':'OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214,,sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 3?8 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shag ed use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENV 4ONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of he Probable Probable More ' Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water ' Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shore/ne Use Utilities Animals ' Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLII;Y-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS r t O N < <�rc ti E��! C7 L v e c y 0. We have rev,?wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio tal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /8 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP2 DOC Rev 10/93 tiSY O n ' AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL 4. 1 INSPECTION ACTIVITIES sep‘ NrcO 200 Mill Avenue South Project Name Address Responsibility under Section 106 of the Uniform Building Code for selection of a testing laboratory (IES) Lies with the owner or his agent (architect or structural engineer of record). The following have been or will be contracted with to perform all inspections required by the Renton Building Department. ❑ Structural Considerations Testing Agency Address ❑ Geotechnical Considerations If Same As Soils Report Testing Agency Address Geotechnical Engineer of Record Telephone We understand that these assignments cannot be changed (transferred?) once the building permit has been issued without the approval of the Building Official. The completed form must be returned to Craig Burnell, Plans Examiner prior to issuance of the Building Permit. Signature of Owner/Authorized Agent Date Print or Type Name Signed Above jc0108 3 14 • c)* Y trERA y _JAW' su Project Name Dowvt 7v wvl Sa I W(t Project Address 5 2mot( St d Contact Person Rich (A.A1c1 Kiev Address Phone Number (4 2 5 ) - Li - 0 5 6 6 • Permit Number L-12/1 - ? - O6Z Project Description r�z plug Cxi 51j1:J p p�s i c rn r mit if u ' lrvu ji) cr;J , cx;511 7 Sa..ua,11,1 - 26, 3$$ s.-F 4 Retail - 1 7, 326 5.-r. it) 7 Sa iciatc' - 56, 300 d JZciai l - 1�J 275 sf . . _- Land Use Type: , Method o Calculation: .- ('r"r' ONO) ❑ Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual 12-- .9C? Pt' (DOD-It ©/Retail 0 Traffic Study 25%0 Fv,wlccV ❑ Non-retail 0 Other y R.Cttil 10320) - 75.62 ,zA rood-it • — - 25`7o pr,Mic vb Calculation: � --- -- ---___-� �x�st �c� �{a�lj pv�svtav -�vp = L.(26.351)(125,40 1 (17,3ZC)(15.6a)] (0.25) — I I6'1. . v1P5. Propvsrc( t,(rnIl pr►wiuvy gips : L (66,30b)(1,5. 1 )4 (lO.275)(75.C2)1 (0.25) - 1160. 3.3 .tvlps /vet rrc-w ofoliv pr,mcrvi 'ti^is = (vi o 3$ ) — ( I I614. 7q ) = 1 q5 , 5q -tv/ei A-t $75 ua,14 (iO (7t5. 51) (.$75 ) Transportation Mitigation Fee: 5 , 6 6q. 25 Calculated by: i/4.f iV ZZ Date: /-1/71 /$ Account Number: , r80:7O-;0 - • Date of Payment City en ton Department of Planning/Building/P Works ENV,'RONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: k w�c COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air _ Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shorel ne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmen al Health _ Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Res:)urces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet Yq.-5 14,000 Feet o4) This site is situated directly below the extended centerline of the airport runway. Height restrictions may affect the permitted building heights. This area should be designated as compatible with airport operations and the operation of aircraft on and from the airport. The use is considered compatible with aviation operations on and from the airport. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The area should be designated as compatible use within the airport runway approach. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS None We have re/iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatio needed to property assess this proposal. (f-) b _ s' � Z�, �59 Signature of 'rector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP2.DOC-. Rev.10/93 _____„, ,, ......., ilkvi ,,.,......-- - F—.---c.-2:741 „, ,1 , I� a lit i!'....- Illibil R. I. hi \.-1 .-• .K T I I�I F.� F rrri _ a.rt.. _ ` ; j i. jgbDf4`V ! . ! 'ANL, t -1 ` a or 1#,„ _ t — ma, IA, it, i V3 '''' 4 "�1 .�11 �1 a _ rma•shn Filer..k I.i o, M "�� 1 ''- alfir Ares,,,--- -, --_ ,;;1,„,,,. .--441 • - A MIEN - glK,,,\ 1)44r .4 . , _,..,,, ,,_.... .,",,,,. .c,__,11' t _ t rack .., ...., " YOW."49 iiiiNt " 'PI I PR e 03 03 aii ...,- , _ ci, ....--'")%.. V --t. .. 4.-.. I' t - -T� �T1 . . liajggilliPa .... ..,. . / \ i rl_ 'A,. " a's 4k.ain- - _•1I. i31i,i 114!.-.g1I -* 0•t,.1.ei..tA 1°13g n •� L 1 L o/_ r U-:nL r.T N: . . 4. PR_.-.-I-44 aE1 gerAt illh 3l;ti..rt, witigPi/1)41-17 .,110K' : X., \\\\. xnr 7"" 9I, /11 n 1 �. ��' 11 /4' 4_..,• ,` �Ili 11 r 1 • =kilfv�,��•► ,� • f ) _ !II° co4171d4,011.5.12__„,111 P AO Irv., \1111116NIfillsmwamri-- -- il . . p 7_,-, iFf ..-ii L___,,.:i;,_Erlikr4 -,/II"' "—ir I 1:f:: .22_. . qi.timasitotv\- r r �V / m J.:1 I r KY 4 1 \ Liph ! ore. 'SI : n.c-Ni ---1 n ' 4 WSI "ZilallakIng H.]-r .a," . 1 \\ , ' . a 'i �_.� n., '�[ems 'v �� .. e.an\ 1 r ritm mealimin , , c.2,„n •-•.-F-rim IN-0_,,,F: iiimi,„1,:aminit , B , -"Jr_q.5; ff t N i L .4 , 11.11 rid - ti_INIO am Imer7 , .,ti--i\ -s 1, 1 7 , .. .\ ,z, . 61\ V(74I V • l_•--1 wil am KM a f'lir� ['11 � _=la =__ -r_ �===r _�_- __-=CQ' �D�o �u 10 or g �� . 1 f..J.,,:..., k. :-.:::::::::::::::::::::::i:::::::-::_ _:::::::::::::1::::::6:::_1::::E:::Essi::::::::._:_:_:_:::__::::::::::::::::::::::.:._:_:,....„wv,L. ,4„ci - -aiii II 11) A -1...-___"". a IA a A.:::::::::::::: _:::E:E:Ea::::::::::::::::::::::- -::::::::::::::::::E:E:E:E__wA-_:_x_:_:_::_::_:_:_:.__,______:_,:::::nk 40 IN P„, -121 iii%_, V.:::::::K:::-::.:::::::::::::::K::::::7-:1:::::::K:::::::::::::E::::::::::::::::::::WE:KSH:E::::::::::Kg.::::::::::::::::-__N ,_opur IL, ,6_,,, ,..r, , ,,, 11111 ‘,4-_.‘_„_,::__::::::.3:::_:_:_:_:_:_::::..:::::::::_„:„.::::::::::,...,„„__,::::.:_:::::„...:._,.:::„_...„:„±:„.„...::::.:3_,..„..„: ,..\ ,, _, ,,„ ....„ig --c,„,,,_ - HIE&I___... il,---_,355f%fl_EEEE'35::_::---_7:. -1::,_:::::::::::::::::::::::::::*:::::::::::::::::K-::-_--"--EK:::_f_f_:::::::::::::::-..:E.-_.E.:Ef_g_f_---_-::::::-. .;q I ' N grfr 1*- ': g\4 'III:IT:Mil Effli 21::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_::::E:::::-:-:::::::::::::::::::::-..--::::::::::::::-:_:__:::::::::E:::::::::::, 1 iii IF. I �=-'2'.— =_=_=_- __ _==----- -=-=----=__, ___ -_=_-=_==== pi fig:'' = ======= =-=====_® oak. r ` -=========--=====_ -:__ ===== ===- =====_ == = ;11 1-11)i 411 Cal ir f ZEI:::::::KE::::::::-.::"EEE::::::::::EEF--cear.tE.2.7.:E:]E:::KE:::-.::5::EEEEEEEREEEEEEE::::::: :::E::::::::].:EKEEE:35:.r it '' L---lry _:_f_,-E3:4-..--,-E]:_:1_--El.:il_Ellit__:_::::::::__::::- rit, -:-:-_-_:-E.,::::::::-:::::-.:::::::::-E::_,-:-E-_::::1:-::-__:::.:-_:_:::::-__:-;:::::::::_::_:::::mAgE.:z...E-::::::-::_:_,_:-::::::--.. [IN i‘ inn."1- 1 iil' ip./ - i . i ...,L. —r4 0046./1 r rl Ili 1!) =E:__— -_ -fii:;:: ,r \ ____ _-__ - -- _- == _ _, ❑e, J(J ,_,_:_:_,_,_:_:_:_,_:__ __,_:_:_„„::::_:_,_:_:_:_,_:_,..: _„.,„, _ i - L • • ti,....._ till pu 4.) kift,..„........„..... , LI 1. , s , , , • A cA! CA ,iu_ bi i nI iS . .- . .• , , 1 R... s R CiLl, cf.) .. _ i 1/4,El .• CD VIII •.....I ••• • - • . > C A cb C D ( P ) cti c A k .. .. 4 .. .. . .... . . ( cA , . , . .._. _ _ ._ S. 2., Street _. ...-414.". , .... ___. .. t-- ii i. c,.., ; ! ...J. , -GE ... . _ > . .j %a ......._, _.. . . __ . i .... r ,... * ,.., c,.., 1 1rr . .. i = . ! , I, I. • ...., ... . . . ......1 , i c i , A . .• . . 1 S. 3rd Streetk .; , r-i ..rf, . _ 4_.. . •- ..._, ... . CD 1 I '.NM City 'en ton Department of Planning/Building/f Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'aka COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMAR) OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (I otal of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 3:'8 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of he Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreli ie Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLIGY-RELATED COMMENTS yOQ aa-e C ice al c H� / r� '7 Z., cC , 2/SD ✓L€00/79 � 3 , t/Lm /S /9,a a a,4e � zo c9'/ 1� ar Gam - �. �m G�'zLY�QSt r 7027 // 'f •lr - i'� /bacLi,!'/ -i ,�c z rh t� a2.c. /arc 1r 1/a u. 7 iW /L2� fa h.�o-e r a C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS -/-- e9/ arc- ;he 77 /!7l! lic-ootov6 lac ird�fG-c c4flr�T�toui_ r917 \��%t�10,72 ��y� 4 �mo . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which vie have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /h 7V' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative DEVAPP2.DOC Rev.10/93 City en ton Department of Planning/Building/P Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LW%AiMe• c DeVdwie►tt'COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 �i APPLICA ION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF �`�' DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE ARE\: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMAR"OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings ( otal of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 3:28 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environmei t Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shorel ne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmen'al Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Res wrces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POL CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. COG E-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher ditt , ' needed to properly assess this proposal. 4&/9 Signature o' irector or Ai rized Representative Date DEVAPP2.y; Rev.10/93 RFNTON FIRE DEPT City c ,nton Department of Planning/Building/Pt, Norks pRri/cruTIflN BUREAU ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVflWob 8ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Forefkreve„,thell COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICAN1: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARY JF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (tc tal of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 321 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a sharei use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Lanc/Shorelin Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmenta,Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resot'ces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet � ,,II /00 AIN i C:/S /0 4/ NJ B. POLIC Y-RELATED COMMENTS /0 A C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS � ,�j ee aC e e.40mmen We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add 71 information)" eeded to properly assess this proposal. 617/9 Srgnatu of C irector or Authorized epresentative Date DEVAPP .DOC Rev.10/93 (vY CITY OF RENTON treDe-% FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM „ N DATE: November 7, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJI=CT: Preliminary Comments for Safeway 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 5,000 gpm. Five fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and four fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. * 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building: 66,575 square feet x $0.52 = $34,619 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. The applicant may be able to reduce or eliminate the fire mitigation fees if the square footage of the existing buildings that are demolished is made available to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. �c cx.5(/z 441 L11i4 uare Qo o 411 e /V c ati id/S./el".s e i l,' ioK �ce i S �q SecC sn ��11 t. •t'Cpe•cc�. CT:ct 2/ •2 5 ua re. fcd1, 7Ae f. safeway - � / (� / / Q!(pr� �G £a i OA A.2 So / rr G Qee/ << Ct�BGc/O' .lC, �a% 7. ' . any -!1 g/7/9(-- City 'en ton Department of Planning/Building/F Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWIN3 DEPARTMENT: i"c4 rta't'it7ti COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA.: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARIt OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 3:8 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shard use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of,'he Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shore!ne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmenal Health Public Services_ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POL CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. COL E-RELATED COMMENTS We have rt viewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi'onal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature cf Director or Authorized Representative Date DLVAPP2.D0.3 Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: MAY 19, 1998 Application No.:LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated May 05, 1998: Applicant: Bayless Brand Wagner Architects Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Safeway Development Work Order No: 78380 Location: 203 South Second Street Site Area: 5.5 acres Building Area(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. Building Area(New expansion gross):66,575 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Existing street improvements are in place (curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, street lights) on all adjacent streets. New proposed driveways will be required to meet current City Codes/Standards and be approved per location by the Transportation Division. A traffic mitigation fee of$75/daily trip in/out of the site will be required. 0 i g—/y—78 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date h:safeway3 City enton Department of Planning/Building/P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 111110 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Sri f , I U4Cii -COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION 203 South Second Street SITE ARE/: 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandlShoreli ie Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resuurces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POL CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have re viewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addit onal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP2.DO,. Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: MAY 19, 1998 Application No.:LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated May 05, 1998: Applicant: Bayless Brand Wagner Architects Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Safeway Development Work Order No: 78380 Location: 203 South Second Street Site Area: 5.5 acres Building Area(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. Building Area(New expansion gross):66,575 sq. ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments SURFACE WATER: The surface water drainage system and temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the city of Renton. Biofiltration will be required (more than 5,000 sq. ft) of new impervious surface subject to vehicular use is proposed to be constructed on the site. Surface water (SDC) fees of $0.129/sq. ft. of new impervious surface installed by the project on site. WASTEWATER: The site will be required to connect to existing sewer mains located in South 2nd Street (12") and South 3rd Street (8") by new side sewer connections with permit fees at $80/connection. All on-site food preparation areas will require grease trap/interceptor meeting current UPC Codes/Standards. Wastewater(SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. 4?-441 Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative Date h:safeway 1 • City' ?nton Department of Planning/Building/Pc Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING+ DEPARTMENT: p 1ah ReV(Cw W7ct"lie COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT l ITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78330 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 323 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a share J use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Rescurces Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLI CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. COG E-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP2.DO: Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Plan Review/Water Comments Due: MAY 19, 1998 Application No.:LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF Date Circulated May 05, 1998: Applicant: Bayless Brand Wagner Architects Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: Safeway Development Work Order No: 78380 Location: 203 South Second Street Site Area: 5.5 acres Building Area(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. Building Area(New expansion gross):66,575 sq.ft. A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code)Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments WATER: New water main, additional fire hydrants and DDCV assembly (building fire control system) will be required and must meet current Fire Codes/Regulations for fire protection of all new proposed buildings on site. New water mains, fire hydrants, DDCV vaults and water meters located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City. Water (SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross site area will be required. 5-/Y-r8 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date h:safeway2 P. I City ,.enton Department of Planning/Building/PL ., Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'a�lGe, COMMENTS DUE: MAY 19, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MAY 05, 1998 APPLICANT: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT T ITLE: Safeway Development WORK ORDER NO: 78380 LOCATION: 203 South Second Street SITE AREA 5.5 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 44,214 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 66,575 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings (tctal of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 3a parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street, and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. A. ENVI1 ONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of tt a Probable Probable More Element of tha Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shorelin3 Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 6777~71)0 ..tdaor_c/ pore/ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this app,'ication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addit'onal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. t( izt!C L f t r ' .S%/-7i Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP2. Rev.10/93 Trespass BUSINESS En f o rc e m e n t WATCH Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code #6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. ,,:Y 0 COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 235 - 2571 M y`edji City of Seattle Paul Schell. Mayor Seattle Public Utilities DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Diana Gale, Director CITY OF RENTON MAY 2 8 1998 May 27, 1998 RECEIVED Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager Development Services City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: LUA-98-052,SA-H, HCF/SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Rosen: As a matter of clarification regarding the above referenced project it should be noted and disseminated to any and all parties associated with this project that any and all uses of Seattle Public Utilities Cedar River Pipeline No. 1, 2, 3 right-of-way must first be coordinated, approved and permitted by Seattle Public Utilities. Seattle Public Utilities has three major pipelines located within this pipeline corridor. Two pipes are 66 inch watermain's and the other is a 55.5 inch watermain. The actual depth of these watermain's may vary and may be relatively shallow in some places. Seattle Public Utilities became aware of Safeway's proposed project in December of 1997. At that time we sent Safeway a letter requesting additional information regarding the project and at least four(4) complete sets of plans for our consideration, review, recommendations and possible approval. At the present time we have not received additional information, formal design plans and/or site specifications from Safeway which delineates the proposed impact and/or use upon Seattle Public Utilities Fee Owned Right of Way. Any proposed use(s) of SPU property by Safeway must first be reviewed, opined upon and approved by Seattle Public Utilities. Principal contact person(s)with Seattle Public Utilities for the permitting and approval process is Ms. Shirley Lukhang. (206) 386-9754 or myself William P. Cluckey (206) 684-5970. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours, 0,‘,117 William P. Cluckey Senior Real Property Agent Real Property Services cc:Safeway, Inc. attn:Martin Jouflas Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor,710 Second Avenue,Seattle,WA 98104 Tel:(206)684-5851,TTY/TDD:(206)233-7241,Fax:(206)684-4631 An equal employment opportunity,affirmative action employer.Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request. --„, - a 0 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works 0 oi. a . 2. Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 S hu ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 01.- 0P - 90 P 0 ' ,xi; Stgti. PitiTAGE i DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON MAY 1 5 1998 000720-0123-01 STEINER FREDERICK J+LILLIAN179999 14610 SE 184TH PL 98058 RECEIVED RENTON WA ---1 i , 0 ( ' • ''' \ i .: ,jr1 Ti! :, P '-i.; ? ' 1111181 #.98658 -(1 HJAJdkudJAkAl 1,1AAI.V1.11WAAA.11.1 /c., •}...r{+.•:�3v::2. 'H4 .Y,r+,.},r,.y,.. :}.::.:.��.. F ...h..?!!:r. 'T•aR:}::;:•;:•}{}T:•};h;F,.��.x: ":3`ti.'x.,y04{:{•}{::.}: ,{.• .G.,,: v K .f :.,5l.'x:3. .S •h•• ."y4'!�i�:n: :{•Ji;:: .n\::+•v.;l.},.,.;:•.'f:,':.y i. ;.;y: k Y .J.,. ti }.. }T}:t.. t �+.'Y`<:^:;J i:v:�: {r:{.}'•:v'x`:��«'r':: T.;. ..J. }vT�}$1'...v r .�3 .x„ :.:.<::.. �O, ENTON:��i:.77:;...,. t}<�:.:wx• :>::.�:: ..�.}.�.�. .<::},;>x;:>`:< : ::<>:: �„� .. ;g.v.,fGt;:}:t:;»:;<CITY F`fl . J.:.,:.::: . f •x>i... ::. r . : �.:.;,, r ..y'rF� ;,} �.�..`.4:.:�:'?},ft� ',.. ,�'�•`;,q'.�.,.•��.•.;'�.�? Ji.. •xnsc':`:cx'.:nxi'r:e:•�'J},C,.;!{°�.i{.'{ 7.{x•:�..a.••.}'c5�+ <x{:};::) % .4`T7}#,r.yK,ya:.7}i.:r.>'::in £:%.',xYfiT ...;�,ar.hS:r..,i�C.. T. } .t• 7 'c34 4<:l ..t.'.7..�..,,:. J �:. ... � 7;,�y,�rr�'; , �� •�::,::{:�;�'• u�?.DEVEt_QPM�N'1•:>SERVI.CES b(VIStON;4,}7<}>v7;:tt.7>};.,:.:7:;..`�•.�� .,y..;„�;�<`'�:�,� :.�:..>4:, }• ..0R•..bGY:•... r r'.. x.;^?T.••T:a.. 7.,Jx}';`}>::x. •.,J,.>}., , xy.�<:3c.!#• '.i ni,,.7ti:..;>.!s�. ::Q;?h}7:.r•Fr,.,x;}.�°. �`..�,},�, �,y.� ..... �xa?.`. .T.'�f�2•.•...h......,''�c.^.k......i.. '•t`�<•::r:? %::.:....o.. .....��.jC .T'�;'S.•.: a i�" „Q:•. �........�:"�.:..,•...i...}. �p�•.'4.. I•.`�q�-.}$�j?:fi�.4� 'Ca}`n „�• r �{:O:J:A'<rv2w:::::::::.v+.•n• ...�.'1,i qv.'n.}T{.:TT�:T;.t^#.:::{�Y,t:•:.w v •. :�...r��(,.>::ti:ii�'r:•i:v :' r,.7'?':tl h k>^^,..} v:�.� {Oi.•..v a t r J.J:J :Y:. }.. !' 4 J.vr.{,,y,, a J; h� EIST OF SURRy, O�UNDING }PROPER F' OWNFRS''�i, �•• i r•:.+.!}::t•}:T.;ts.7 }x•::T:::••:�`.++..:Tr.•x•:;.:;•`•:t;:::•.'F:47f4%:k4c{.:r::♦•.'.:tii•}:rnP:.�ax..t•:T T:4•aw.w:}:r:'yx:•.,:5}}.;.:Cw•:;v,Jfnx),...v s:4''R' hw'{J7:I}}•}+;•.T::xt.. :?K.;S} •r,••7?<w`5:€; . :.}:!.xr.;:.,:.t ... .,. . s:,..a•?oy. ••-5•};,•: ,:.:.,.+•,< T%.: �: ..,.,:;.,• ,,iicc?•7.:.:€>�•:.y ; :.;;..:.� .,,;;R::{{:;:!;•!'{:. .,}. a•• }:!<:.:.;!:t;x. .,w:,: x '>.:;.yT::.JJ:v:!.:h!,kJ: :t7, .'•�.� y:�.<:}::�;.>:t•c>:::�}�:w�thirts�300feet:of.�ttie`sut1ec "si d }.�}.q':�:��.k,�.., .;»' >�+: {.:x<,�;�7: <..,..�: ::: T :.v...'v: .4.v;.n;4:k.},.:..: •.�:..�. :..., J .�n..�V.JF:n..:S•n.rh.d.,n.v,..:GY��YA.Y��i$i. r.: vvty +:•�tK xJ�•.:na'J�:7}.h..v:t":+.i;•T:{ix4.;}}�•Y.;:i•}+;}Tr...;rY F :,....... n... PROJECT NAME: Safeway Store #1563 • APPLICATION NO: LU IA 95,062, S lq- rl+ I L The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL Cooks BP Mart 150 SW Sunset Blvd NUMBER • Renton WA 98055 000720-0003-06 Sandoy Fred B & Erna M 220 Shattuck Ave S 000720-0054-04 Renton WA 98055 Renton School Dist 403 435 Main Ave S 000720-0060-06 Renton WA 98055 Macris Jessie PO Box 7600 • 000720-0101-07 c/o Union Oil Co of California Los Angeles CA 90051 Union 'Oil Co PO Box 7600 000720-0101-98 Lcs. Angeles CA 90054 • Sens Gene P+Huong T c/o 212 S 3rd 000720-Q115-01 Renton WA 98055 Sens Gene P+Huong T c/o 212 S 3rd 000720-0116-00 Renton WA 98055 Steiner Frederick J + Lillian 14610 SE 184th P1 000720-0123-01 • Renton WA 98058 First Inter Bnk-Kirkland PO Box 63931 000720-0124-00 Wells Fargo Bank - 92685 San Francisco CA 94163 Anna Malesis L.L.0 261 Taylor Ave 000720-0126-08 Renton WA 98055 Barei Mrs. Umberto 322 S .15jh:St • 000720-013.1-01 Renton WA 98055 • McDonald Ronnie A + Roberta K • 216 NW 5th St 0007•M0-0132-00 Renton WA 98055 Steiner Frederick 10856 Rainier Ave S O a0-0137-05 ET Seattle WA 98178 C'/ 'Oti1F �Op A • Mqy R /I/TOA/ //VG /In (Attach additional sheets, if necessary)1 I898 /fr (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL tiay- of Renton 200 Mill Ave S • • NUMBER Renton WA 98055 000720-0141-09 Zerbato Aldo L 205 S 3rd St 000720-0142-08 Renton WA 98055 Sci Management Corp 8th Fl #2920 Prop Tax Dept 000720-0157-00 1929 Allen Parkway Houston Tx 77019 First Inter Bnk-Kirkland PO Box 63931 000720-0165-00 Wells Fargo Bank - 92685 San Francisco CA 94163 • Applicant Certification I, //e,.); , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records ❑ Title Company Records King County Assessors Records • Signed ��% Date '� (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at /,(/�gpJ./Jt//t1.k ,,i,J4 on the 3Or�day of MAP/V./4 , 199, . Signed (Notary Public) Cl • ............... .... ....:;.:.::..:.:... ERTLFI CAT ION:OF MAILI G ........:` '� :< .......:... ..:<::::c•<::;<::>::,....:,:::::.:.;....:.::..:::: :N. t 'hereb ha .n t` .��jdt � y cert,fy,t;..t.„.ot,ces of the proposed application-were rrtatled to c :It • Signed• • T ATTEST Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and<for the State of Washington restdtng at # �r Bctprop.doc REV°7195 MARILYN KAMCHEFF 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Lightfoot Joseph + Marylyn C 3300 Island Crest Way 000720-0172-01 Mercer Island WA 98040 McDonald Ronnie A + Roberta K 216 NW 5th St 000720-0173-00 Renton WA 98055 Sci Management Corp 8th Fl #2920 Prop Tax Dept 000720-0184-07 1929 Alien Parkway Houston TX 77019 City of Seattle 000720-0188-03 Malesis Enterprises 902 S 32nd P1 000720-0190-09 Renton WA 98055 Barei Mrs Umberto 322 S 15th St 722950-0072-02 Renton WA 98055 Azzola Zafira Estate 4751 Richmond Ave 784 1 30-00 1 5-05 c/o Mary Beretta Fremont CA 94536 Connote Albert 232 Evans Ave 784130-0020-08 Missoula MT 59801 Corp Catholic Archbishop 910 Marion 784130-0035-01 St Anthony Parish Seattle WA 98104 World Association for Child PO Box 88948 784180-0085-09 Seattle WA 98138 World Association for Child PO Box 88948 784180-0085-90 Seattle WA 98138 Blackwell Beverly Ann 215 Whitworth Ave S 784180-0090-02 Renton WA 98055 Renton Aerie 1722 Fraternal 316 S Third St 784 1 80-0 1 05-05 Renton WA 98055 Renton Aerie 1722 Fraternal 316 S Third St 784 1 80-01 1 5-03 Renton \VA 98055 Hendrickson Raeanne 322 S 3rd St 784180-0125-01 Renton WA 98055 Washington Donuts Inc Box 317 Renton #4585 922890-0005-03 Randolph MA 02368 J J J Inc 5641 Pleasure Pt Ln 922890-0015-01 Bellevue WA 98006 (Continued) (Continued) - NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Blencoe Harry A & Janet 112 Monterey Dr NE 922890- 0 0 25 -09 Renton WA 98056 Blencoe Harry A & Janet 112 Monterey Dr NE 922890-0035-07 Renton WA 98056 Bishop of Ch Jesus Christ 50 E North Temple 922890-0045-05 Social Service Ctr Salt Lake City UT 84150 Marcris Jessie PO Box 7600 000720-0101-07 c/o Union Oil Co of America Los Angeles CA 90051 Dennys Inc PO Box 1600 182305-9067-09 Rowlett TX 75088 Warren/Kellogg/Barber 100 S 2nd St 182305-9236-05 Dean & Fontes Renton WA 98055 Accord Inc 3300 Maple Valley Hwy 182305-9076-08 Renton WA 98058 S & \V Partnership 720 Rainier Ave S 182305-9062-04 Renton WA 98055 City of Seattle 1823059-208-09 Hsue Kwai + Lee-Yuh 7515 SE 71st 182305-9171-02 Mercer Island WA 98040 Tonkin Frank J. 3300 Maple Valley Hwy 182305-9070-04 Renton WA 98048 Wendco NW Ltd Partnership PO Box 256 182305-9087-05 Attn: Tax Dept Dublin OH 43017 Snyder Richard M 5411 154th Ave SE 182305-9063-03 Bellevue WA 98006 4•®+ Q,,N COS NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MAY 05,1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF I SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center,replacing lour separate retail buildings(total of 44,214 sq.It.)with a new 56,300 sq.fl.Safeway store and 10,275 sq.R.of attached retail space. The proposal Includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed vie two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street,and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. GENERAL LOCATION: 203 South Second Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Geotechnical Engineering Study PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Site Plan Approval(SA-H) Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development • Services Division.200 Mill Avenue South.Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on June 22,1998.This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on June 30,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South.If you are Interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425) 277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear al the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Healing Examiner.If you have questions about This proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)235.2719.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. `PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE OF APPLICATION: MAY 04,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MAY 05,1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: MAY 05,.1998 I ul r _ u Auporl ray 2 B ��N/Y/411. L/ CA 1 T rq.. s ILrtlllr¢n�s q I h+ $J IS-Totiin Sl. Ir' �a I! lul eeloa v win_ ,F 2ndi3 a ,�� '�.. © s zaa st. ` I Z 1 " r cs � '� ca 4r�, t oCA ill.iN -r. F°4u0.) l I a FDCI{3a CA` CA83r • 1a R a a CA ( GENMAL( 7 if.'sa \ 0� m fTlp CA CERTIFICATION I, 411 Al in/di 1—r , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on AA 7,/9 eg • Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in�j�_-rv4-cp-v) , on the i y day of I(A � /�1 �a . G C..---7,21 et.A..i — 711C-2-4-1-----6,4s..26-6---' . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 • 6 Y Pt + .111711R4 ��'NT0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MAY 05, 1998 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF/SAFEWAY DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for redevelopment of the existing Safeway Shopping Center, replacing four separate retail buildings(total of 44,214 sq.ft.)with a new 56,300 sq.ft. Safeway store and 10,275 sq.ft. of attached retail space. The proposal includes 328 parking spaces. Access is proposed via two driveways off South Third Street; one driveway off South Second Street,and a shared use driveway off Rainier Avenue South. GENERAL LOCATION: 203 South Second Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Geotechnical Engineering Study PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Site Plan Approval(SA-H) Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on June 22,1998. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on June 30,1998,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425) 277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at(425)235-2719. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: MAY 04, 1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MAY 05, 1998 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: MAY 05,.1998 _ _ — Airport Way 8_2n_d--St � I I !CA', I S I I1dI ME j 9NNN- , ///rr Io - CA rCA S Tobin at'. RI!!-I i -OD, RM-U e2:!! PV/e y �^ 'R-8.I j R=8 is _I j6 QI P" �' W VICt ``� A "rq CA 1 C �'� .i wrwa.eun .1 IIan c� � i � oiuurun > 1�1FG.,. ( R-4° o - CD(P) ..... �. i w 2nd S• CA:;,, .......,. T Ll.i: A - CA S 2nd St. g . - La 8 r� t_-h__ C9 CD CD 'R;el '0 -G;JP ',;'i l I,1. IcayI IICDi l ICDI Ii.I '® CA5¢�,;� CAS,3rd�P o - IL -- .c cr CD CD CD CD f�cD cDICD / ,y' '� C C➢ D CD1CD DICD -.11 CA�/ to ` �'�. CA _ - - /� 9D: A G 0GENMAL( RM—I,,, s \, CA rn _rlrl r--ir-i r-lr-in r— CITY OF RENTON LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 5, 1998 Mr. Kevin Barber Baylis Brand Wagner Architects 10801 Main Street, Suite#110 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Safeway Development Project No. LUA-98-052,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Barber: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on June 02, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, June 30, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at (425) 235-2719, if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1 - Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Safeway, Inc./Owners ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CIT'_ OF RENTON W' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 15, 1998 • • Kevin Barber Baylis Brand Wagner Architects 10801 Main Street, Suite 110 • Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Safeway Redevelopment Project LUA-98-052, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Barber: Thank you for your recent land use application for the Safeway Redevelopment Project. The submittal requirements for a land use application require the notarized signatures of all property owners of record on the Master Application. With your project application, we have only the authorized signature for Safeway, Inc. In order to process this application, we will need the notarized signatures of ALL property owners as listed on the title reports. However, if transfers of ownership are underway for these properties, then a revised title report listing Safeway, Inc. as the property owner would be sufficient to complete the application. At this time your project application is incomplete. We will need the above information in order to formally accept and review your application. The materials you submitted will be held for three weeks. If your application is not complete as of May 6th, a refund will be issued and your application will be returned. If you have any questions regarding this requirement, please call me at (425) 277-6170. Sincerely, tfi5 /144 Uv Lesley Nishihira Planning Technician cc: Safeway, Inc. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 COThis paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CJ7G l U( N/-rC-- CITY OF RENTON: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLI CATION : ......... .... . . . . RROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT INFORMATION :::n:i...,..,:i.:.E.?::,::,..:i...: Note .:(f there s more then pip legal,owner,;please attach ar�:additional _ ribtaiiied..Master Application..for.each`owner,`..: .. ..< PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Safeway Store No. 1563 Safeway, Inc. PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS:. r121 124th NE • 203 S. 2nd Street PO Box 85001 Renton WA • CITY: Bellevue WA ZIP: 98015-8501 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): See Legal Description 7?9-11'�'D-OI3I c�OZD7 �^ ®Qlql TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): / Z'a�D7 L�� 425.455.6444 Commercial 0007?0-0 l I IAPPLI. .... (if other than owner) ' `>> DDd 7�'(1 6fR PROPOSED LAND USES: (y69079-0-10-1?- NAME: Kevin Barber Commercial ' lg o-. 0140 . COMPANY (if applicable): • EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects Employment area - Commercial ADDRESS: . PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 10801 Main St. Suite 110 N/A CITY: Bellevue WA ZIP: 98004 EXISTING ZONING: . CA Commercial Arterial TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): 425.454.0566 •— . CONTACT PERSON N/A =_ : NT py�,NNING. SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACRE jE OPME . ENToN • NAME: Kevin Barber Cl r(OF R 5.5 acres 1'1M il 4 '1998 COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: RECEIVED Baylis Brand Wagner Architects $2,5000,000 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 10801 Main St., Suite 110 No CITY: ZIP: Bellevue WA 98004 • IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: No 425.454.0566 I. 3 LEGAL'DESCRI DN OF PROPERTY (Attach':sep'a :sheet.if.necessary) See Site plan for existing and proposed property line locations. Legal description • to be provided with future survey after final negotiation with City of Renton is complete. See attached Boundary Survey from Horton Dennis and Assoc. dated 1/22/96. • • TYPE OF; APPLICATION & FE• ES Check all' application types;that::apply--City staff will determine fees _ ANNEXATION S SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ XSITE PLAN APPROVAL $d ' _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT • $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ _ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ • _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge )•C ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $if-;00, REVISION $ I, (Print Name) gill A , declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, 'the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. _0/ !i ATTEST: Subscribed a d sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and� /�Gj/ for t 4.a Stale of __residing at (Name of Owner/Representative) _PR) , on the.3r'(fday of 19 (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Notary Public) T I sec . :30 completed by City Staff ) Gt FIIe Number ��✓ .��'` ,.: ;R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP SP RUMP 1/. Y E....MHP..:. BSP:..:.A.:..:CPA..:'..:.: :.;:;;.::...., • TOTAL FEES $ ! "' TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED S " MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 April 3, 1998 I, (Print Name)crC.A )q) td,SeNicIare that as the owner of the property for the proposed Safeway Store No. 1563, located at 203 South 2nd Street, Renton, WA involved in this application, do authorize Kevin Barber as authorized representative to act in my behalf that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained, and the information herewith submitted, are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. The signature on the attached Master Application is that of Kevin Barber, authorized representative for Mitchell Johnson. Mithw �. \10 K mso a4 Name of Owner Safeway Store No. 1563 Iit,6L ignature of tiwner `i"''Q Safeway Storl No. 1563 BAYLIS BRAND WAGNER I: I I FC.- Ts Safeway # 1563 at 203 South 2nd Street - Renton, Washington April 3, 1998 This proposal is for the development of a 5.5-acre site near the northeast corner of Rainier Avenue and South 3rd Street in Renton, Washington. Current development on the site consists of four separate retail buildings and their related site improvements. They include: Safeway, one restaurant and a storage facility, Custom Picture Framing, and Viking/White Sewing & Vacuum. The site is surrounded on the west by an existing Taco Time restaurant, Wendy's Restaurant, and Subaru Dealership, and to the east by Gene's Restorante and two 2-story apartment buildings. To the south, across South Third Street, lies numerous retail shops, and to the north, across South Second Street, lies Renton High School and general commercial businesses. The comprehensive plan shows this site designated as Employment Area, which allows for the proposed development. The underlying zoning is CA, Commercial Arterial, as adopted in the Zoning Code of February 2, 1998. The proposal includes approximately 66,600 SF of retail space which will be developed in phases. Phase I will include removal of all buildings, except the existing Safeway, construction of the new 56,300 SF Safeway building, and approximately one-half of all site improvements. Phase II will include removal of the existing Safeway store and completion of the new Safeway store and remaining site improvements. Phase III will include the construction of the adjacent in-line retail shops. Earthwork includes clearing and grubbing. and cutting and filling as necessary to achieve workable grades for a retail development. Other site improvements include underground sanitary, water, gas, telephone, electricity, storm water collection, paving, and landscaping. Additionally, surface improvements include a pedestrian connector from the frontage sidewalk connecting all retail facilities. The proposed buildings are scaled and sited to be appropriate for the commercial neighborhood. The exterior materials will be giant brick, smooth and textured block masonry, and stucco-like finishes with metal trims. Pedestrian walks along buildings will be accented by decorative paving planters and covered by canopies and/or awnings constructed of fabric and/or metal. Colors will be earth tones with bright accents. Signs will be displayed only on backgrounds designed for such purpose and will be consistent with governing ordinances of the City. Construction Mitigation Refer to Environmental Checklist Questions A6, B I(h), BD L2.'t %otuld Civil Drawings. C1N b Assoc,,,,, Kent Pearse,AIA PRINCIPALS Planning • Architecture • Interiors ( O 4 �� MitchYockes Al El Baylis,AIA AI 10801 Main Street • Bellevue, Washington 98004 �� Johan Luchsinµer AI-S Brian Brand, A r CD Susan Christofides :\,SD Richard L.Wagner,AIA FAX (425) 453-8013 >r f" I Robert B.Reed.AIA Thomas Frye,jr.,AIA (425) 454-0566 RE GE Guy Peckham AI:\ CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a questions does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. Even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", and "affected geographic area", respectively. Or;w;i:f!r F , w CITY OF REJ i cJt'J MAY 0 4 1998 - 1 - RECEdVED Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposal project, if applicable: Renton Safeway Plaza. 2. Name of applicant: Kevin Barber. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Baylis Brand Wagner Architects 10801 Main Street, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 Telephone: (425) 454-0566 4. Date checklist prepared: March 2, 1998 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction in June, 1998. Store to be complete in December, 1998. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. All other shops and pads (besides Safeway) to be built under separate permits. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. -City of Renton Building Permit - City of Renton Site Plan Approval - City of Renton Clearing & Grading -2 - Environmental Checklist 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) 5.5 acres developed for detail use. 56,300 SF Safeway store to be built first, other structures to be built under separate permit. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. if a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site Address: 203 South 2nd Street Renton, WA Location: Bounded by 2nd Street to the north, 3rd Street to the south, Shattuck Avenue to the east, and Rainier Avenue to the west. Vicinity Map & Plans: See attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximately percent slope)? 35% occurring at small areas of depression in the center of the site. Grade change of approximately 5 feet. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to Geotechnical Engineering study, soils include fill consisting of loose to medium dense silty sand and sandy silt underlain by native soil consisting of varying deposits of silty sand, poorly graded sand, and poorly graded gravel. Some very loose to loose deposits of sandy silt were encountered. The poorly granded sand and poorly graded gravel were generally loose to dense. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No erosion or landslides are visible. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximately quantities of any filler or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Cut and fill for general grading and water control. Approximate cut: 7,000 C.Y. Approximate Fill: 6,500 C.Y. -3 - Environmental Checklist f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe Yes, erosion during construction of site could occur. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 95% if all proposed buildings and parking were constructed. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control facilities will be installed throughout project to prevent sediment from leaving site. Project shall comply with City of Renton design standards for temporary erosion control. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Typical emissions associated with construction equipment. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Machines required to be kept in good working order. No equipment will be left running for long periods when not in use 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. -4- Environmental Checklist 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be modified. 2) Describe waste that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? With this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. In the developed state, the site will be virtually impervious except for the planter and landscaped areas. Runoff from the parking lot and driveway areas will be collected by means of an under- ground piping system and routed to an underground detention vault. The underground detention vault will provide live storage for storm detention plus dead storage to provide for water quality treatment, The discharge from the detention vault will go into an existing 24" storm drain running southwest across the site. Runoff from the building roof will be collected and discharged directly into the 24" storm drain without going through the detention system, since water quality control is not required for the roof areas. The total discharge from the site, including both the detention vault discharge and roof drainage will be designed so that the peak flows will be either equal to or less than the existing peak flow rates. The existing 24" pipe heads westward from the site. Please refer to the Preliminary Technical Information Report prepared by Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc., dated February 19, 1998, for more information. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Any possible waste materials being collected by the on-site collection system from the parking lot and driveway areas (road oils and/or animal excrement) would be routed through the underground detention vault which will also provide for water quality treatment and control. Therefore, the likelihood of waste materials entering the ground or surface waters is remote. -5 - Environmental Checklist d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See previous comments. 4 PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grasses, shrubs and some trees. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None, see Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Important Wildlife Information. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Project shall comply with all applicable landscape design standards for the City of Renton. 5.ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle,(on,gbirds)other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish,other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Enhancement through landscaping to preserve and improve habitat area. -6- Environmental Checklist 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.. Electricity, natural gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy efficient lighting and building construction. Energy management system. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Disposal of all waste in accordance with all regulations. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, aircraft,other)? Traffic from adjacent streets. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long- term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Typical for construction of a commercial project during standard working day. Short-term noise: Construction activity; Long-term noise: Vehicle traffic associated with shoppers. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Maintain equipment in good working order. Project shall comply with City of Renton construction schedule hours of operation regulations . -7 - Environmental Checklist 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Retail consisting of an existing Safeway store, drug store, and other small retail pads. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Retail Buildings: 26,388 SF Safeway - 13,762 SF A&H Drugstore - 1 ,817 SF Custom Picture Frame - 2,247 Viking/White Sewing & Vacuum. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. All structures noted in 8c. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CA- Commercial Arterial. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment area - commercial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Project site lies outside of shoreline designation area. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 150, subject to all stores being built. None would reside. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project display? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Development in accordance with Zoning Regulations and Comprehensive Plan of Renton.. -8 - Environmental Checklist 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 36 foot, colored split-face concrete. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Project shall comply with City of Renton Architectural & Site Design Standards. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot lighting, building and signage lighting. 24 hours/day, no significant glare. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Vehicular traffic from existing adjoining streets, parking lot lighting, building and signage lighting. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All security and parking lighting will have cut-off type fixtures to control glare. No scintillating or flashing lights will be used. -9 - Environmental Checklist 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Public school and park to the north. Downtown piazza to the east. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. No impacts expected. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: No impacts expected. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 2nd Street, 3rd Street, and Shuttack Avenue. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Completed project will increase the parking count to 337. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None, see attached Traffic Impact Analysis. -10 - 1 • Environmental Checklist e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Renton Municipal Airport to the north. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See attached Traffic Impact Analysis. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Payment of traffic impact fees to the City of Renton. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, Police and Fire Protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Added tax revenue. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities current available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity, telephone, natural gas, sanitary sewer, refuse service, water. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: L/ Name Printed: i ' 1 ?f7G/ Date: 4'4/ / ///eS - 11 - PEE-09-1998 OS:_9 FRO(' JT CEELLEUUE) COIIr1ERCIHL TO TrlT-r!T_. F.01 0-1 TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY � 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: Transnation No. 864179 TRANSNATION NAT'L SERVICES Customer Reference: 95-18-0917 Escrow No. • 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Seller Smith SEATTLE, WA 98101 Buyer/Borrower Safeway Attn: CAROL GARNER By nA44,I SQL (\ • For service on this order call: (425) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S. NIKLASON (FAX # (425) 646-8593) SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 2 TO THE FIRST COMMITMENT ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes �'N, impact title to property set forth in the above-reference 7)1c. ,;).,fitment. CIA Effective Date: February 3 , 1998 at 8 : 00 A.M. o °'V '"VG Ric � 1gge SCHEDULE "A" /� �O The Owner's policy coverage is changed as follows: ALTA Owner's Policy $450, 000. 00 Premium $1, 275. 00 Standard Policy Tax $ 109 . 65 Proposed Insured: • SAFEWAY, INC. SCHEDULE "B" Viv v •q6 A) Paragraph No. 2 of the preliminary commitment is changed as follows : General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 000720-0199-00 1998 $3, 616. 47 $ 0 . 00 $3 , 616 .47 B) Paragraph No. 3 of the preliminary commitment is changed as follows: Conservation (CON) service charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 000720-0199-00 1998 $ 5. 00 $ 0. 00 $ 5 . 00 ' FEB-09-1998 08:39 FROr TNT (BELLEVUE) COMMERCIAL TO TIIT-MTS P.02%0-t Order No. 864179 C) Paragraph No. 8 is deleted. D) The following is added as Paragraph 10: EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: Electric Transmission and/or distribution lines AREA AFFECTED: As described therein RECORDING NO. : 9605030333 THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER SINCE APRIL 4 , 1995, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE, AND THOSE SET FORTH IN Supplement No. 1. ---END--- • Page 2 l TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N. E. P.O. BOX 1493 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 Prepared for: Transamerica No. 864179 Customer Reference: 95180917 TRANSAMERICA NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. --- Seller Smith 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Buyer/Borrower --- SEATTLE, WA 98101 A Attn: CAROL GARNER By '1/1.4AAFor service service on his order call: (206) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S. NIKLASON (FAX # (20v` ! 646 859�) l n' � 1 SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1 TO THE FIRST COMMITMENT ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes which impact title to property set forth in the above-referenced commitment. Effective Date: August 23 , 1995 at 8 : 00 A.M. .K0)06.- n� .02) SCHEDULE "A" The vesting is changed as follows : 1°) -) (/ O \ 'GARY E. SMITH, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE 1 , 1 EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS REPORTED HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS N 0 T BEEN RE-EXAMINED. ---END--- MSN/jkl ENCLOSURES':( Sketch All recorded encumbrances 1 / TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N.E. P.O. BOX 1493 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 Prepared for: Transamerica No. 864179 Customer Reference: 95180917 TRANSAMERICA NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. --- Seller Smith 1200 6TH AVE. Buyer/B rr w r --- SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attn: CAROL GARNER By For s ry qe on is or er ca : (206 6 Gf-858.5/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. TONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or S-- is1IKLASON (FA (206) 646-8593) SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: April 4 , 1995 at 8 : 00 A.M. 1 . Policy or policies to be issued: Amount Alta Owner's Policy TO BE DETERMINED Premium (SEE NOTE 1) Standard Policy Tax Proposed Insured: TO BE DETERMINED Total (SEE NOTE 1) 2 . Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: GARY E. SMITH AND SONJA M. SMITH, HIS WIFE 3 . The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION: " Order No. 864179 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN DONATION CLAIM NO. 37 , AND THAT PORTIO: OF TRACT 14 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, ALL SITUATED IN SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVE. (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 3RD STREET (FORMERLY 3RD AVE. ) ; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE 'OF 537 . 50 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 140. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 48 . 98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF LAKE STREET, ACCORDING TO SAID RENTON SHORE LANDS MAPS, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVI THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 57 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 254 . 69 FEET FOR A DISTANCE OF 173 . 43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 88 . 55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 3RD STREET, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 05 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 129 . 15 FEET FOR A DISTANCE OF 10. 03 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 252 . 70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 40 FEET THEREOF; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 2 • Order No. 864179 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. C. Special exceptions: 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82 . 45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is 0178T) General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and S' statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) 1()I Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance � ► b 000720-0199-00 1995 $3 , 790. 29 $ 0. 00 $3 , 790. 29 The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1995. 3 . Conservation (CON) service charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 000720-0199-00 1995 $ 1. 25 $ 0. 00 $ 1. 25 4 . Liability for surface water management (SWM) service charges, if any, which are not presently assessed, but may appear on future rolls. 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY : Instrument recorded under Recording No . 5512374 PURPOSE: Sanitary sewer and storm drain AREA AFFECTED: As described therein 6 . Reservations contained in deed recorded under Recording No. 2595089 , substantially as follows: The Grantor is to retain 1/2 of the mineral and oil or gas right (s) underlying the above property (Covers portion of property herein described, lying Easterly of Tract 14 of Renton Shorelands Second Supplemental and other property) Page 3 Order No. 864179 7 . Reservation contained in deed from the State of Washington recorded under Recording No. 7210100647 , reserving to the grantor all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc. , and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same, and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry. (Covers Tract 14 of Renton Shorelands Second Supplemental) 8 . Numerous items of record against parties with names similar to Gary E. Smith and Sonja M. Smith, the effects of which cannot be determined without the showing of proper identification. It is requested that the attached questionnaire be properly completed and returned to this Company to assist us in establishing the identity of Gary E. Smith and Sonja M. Smith. 9 . Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property; and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. NOTE 1 : The Company may have further requirements if the amount to be insured exceeds the current assessed valuation. NOTE 2 : Title is to vest in persons not yet revealed, and when so vested, will be subject to matters disclosed by a search of the records against their names. NOTE 3 : There may be Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Security interests filed with the Department of Licensing in Olympia, affecting personal property, crops or agricultural facilities which are not covered by the policy to issue. NOTE 4 : Deed recorded under Recording No. 9005040732 discloses possible beneficial unrecorded easements to benefit this property END OF EXCEPTIONS Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. BW/jkl ENCLOSURES: Sketch All recorded encumbrances Page 4 _ _ IF �-N GHOAR 4iVCf; rl,-IL1,JC I �'� /// tI YOE J/w.71A IPA 4118. 14 0 V 4L •4C : ;ti`� ;14 i ,4 V,' ' 05 . , .1--7 J/.w.7e r!ev- r z • ro /.' O' i rr; h p� • 1; � �5. No . a .F `t 1iva � 10pti V 2 . N a.n- 77• b g TR.^ *� N^ :l. �ti��:7—I 01• Zs It pC ~h_.1. to LiZ lZS• G ®: v^ t • -4o -.so Ii♦IIr , i iry f• t $1C),40 ` y r • C.• •/Ia • /7• �v1/ l/f-0/.r-. k �a-I k M o Z�F. aaoa wy� o' 0 t ♦t�*i es K h ‘1 �Z by *4 r TR.y 1♦ k e O — . .,♦sr r ;, 4 t, =21 7z a t**C., 'y^\�1t 2 ♦ ,1/d so•so� ii do• iG• \\ 5i' tsco`< yPL� . 41- v TR1. `L ~v / t 14 VI /c��• F�O� �ii�� t ul pp V l_` W 0 ,di '/\\ ',:l /1.��3r oil♦ `r c o 1' oc,. Q SC �` tt' O t tf a ��✓ �� p•G '+ ‘� ^ a \.1-'y r,\( ,- „7.* .3. Sz E A/j� . .r� 4.o / J 57 3 ,,1I• ro „if ` 144./7 N4d--f'i-SOr.'(.r) (3 86 Sw-!�N x54.a• 5 'rr�— •s N , ,tea R'I " S. THIRD ST t' '= r ?• 4-7.34.6 t its.Z3 43 S7•0.4-G 75 to 17 _z / \. y, -5 4.S 7' A 7 - r / � o tN00 / \ �Opt,I.` 0 t` A t ' • � c!o O ° • O \ 3° v" 01'' i. t �y tr 1 V,uk O C O \ �� Ot I I�" ?6/ )' . 1 - - 52• vM•wo1 This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, casements, en- croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LiABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further information. n • 1- ( , TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N.E. P.O. BOX 1493 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 Prepared for: Transamerica No. 864182 Customer Reference: 95180918 TRANSAMERICA NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. • --- Seller ,- --- 1200 6TH AVE. Buyer/Borrower SEATTLE, WA 98101 v/ / Attn: CAROL GARNER By ,�\:..__! �+ rc v For service on tY is order call: (206) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S. NIKLASON (FAX # (206) 646-8593) SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: April 4 , 1995 at 8 : 00 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount Alta Owner's Policy TO BE DETERMINED Premium (SEE NOTE 1) Standard Policy Tax Proposed Insured: TO BE DETERMINED Total (SEE NOTE 1) 2 . Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND THE CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AS THEIR INTEREST MAY APPEAR 3 . The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST LYING NORTHERLY OF SOUTH 3RD STREET, EASTERLY OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5 (RAINIER AVENUE) AND ADJOINING TRACTS 8 THROUGH 14 OF RENTON SHORELANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS; AND DEPICTED THEREON AS "LAKE STREET" ; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Order No. 864182 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. C. Special exceptions : 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82 . 45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is . 0178 . 2 . The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of execution of a conveyance to a taxable entity and subject to the lien of real property taxes for the balance of the year 1995 . Tax Account No. 722950-0131-01 . The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1995 . 3 . Conservation (CON) service charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 722950-0131-01 1995 $ 1. 25 $ 0 . 00 $ 1. 25 4 . Liability for surface water management (SWM) service charges, if any, which are not presently assessed, but may appear on future rolls . 5 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 5512374 PURPOSE: Sanitary sewer and storm drain AREA AFFECTED: The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described Page 2 • i Order No. 864182 6. UNRECORDED LEASE: LESSOR: City of Renton LESSEE: Harold Mellor DISCLOSED BY: King County Tax Records (Covers 10, 000 square feet of property herein described) 7 . Rights of abutting owners to acquire the captioned property, upon the vacation of Lake Street, and the termination of any rights of the City of Renton or any utility companies which may use or occupy any portion of said tract. NOTE 1 : The Company may have further requirements if the amount to be insured exceeds the current assessed valuation. NOTE 2 : Title is to vest in persons not yet revealed, and when so vested, will be subject to matters disclosed by a search of the records against their names. NOTE 3 : The application for title insurance included a tax parcel number in lieu of a valid legal description. The Company has examined title to the property (set forth at Paragraph 3 , Schedule "A") which it believes was intended by the applicant; and which the Company understands is to be the subject of a street vacation proceeding. The Company will require the approval by the seller of the correct parcel legal description intended for conveyancing before title can be insured. END OF EXCEPTIONS Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. BW/jkl Page 3 TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY C i EY 320 108TH AVENUE N. E. P.O. BOX 1493 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 Prepared for: Transamerica No. 864180 Customer Reference: 95180916 TRANSNATION NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. • Seller CARNEY 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Buyer/Borrower TBD SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attn: CAROL GARNER For service on his order call : (206) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S. NIKLASON (FAX # (206) 646-8593) SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 3 TO THE FIRST COMMITMENT ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes which impact title to property set forth in the above-referenced commitment. Effective Date: June 10, 1996 at 8 : 00 A.M. SCHEDULE "A" The vesting is changed as follows: THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF MAY M. PERICH, DECEASED, AS TO THAT PORTIOT. LYING WITHIN TRACT 10 OF SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS OF RENTON SHORE LANDS; AND MARION E. CARNEY, ALSO APPEARING OF RECORD AS E. MARION CARNEY AND TIi CARNEY INVESTMENT GROUP L. P. , AS TO THE REMAINDER (SEE NOTES 3 , 5 AND 6) SCHEDULE "B" A) The following is added as NOTE 6 : NOTE 6 : We are informed that The Carney Investment Group L.P. is a limited partnership. A copy of the duplicate original of the filed certificate of limited partnership, the partnership agreement and all subsequent modifications must be submitted to the Company for review. EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS REPORTED HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS N 0 T BEEN RE-EXAMINED. ---END--- MSN/kng • TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N. E. P.O. BOX 1493 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 Prepared for: Transamerica No. 864180 Customer Reference: 95180916 TRANSAMERICA NAT'L SERVICES • Escrow No. Seller CARNEY 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Buyer/Borrower TBD SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attn: CAROL GARNER By -WA-5_ For service On this order call : (206) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S. NIKLASON (FAX # (206) 646-8593) SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 2 TO THE FIRST COMMITMENT ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes which impact title to property set forth in the above-referenced commitment. Effective Date: January 31, 1996 SCHEDULE "A" The vesting is changed as follows : • THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF MAY M. PERICH, DECEASED, AS TO THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT 10 OF SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS OF RENTON SHORE LANDS; AND MARION E. CARNEY, ALSO APPEARING OF RECORD AS E. MARION CARNEY AND KATHLEEN FRANCES CARNEY , CHRISTINE V. CARNEY, PATRICIA M. CARNEY GARCIA, THERESA A. CARNEY PETTERSON, KEVIN HUGH CARNEY, HUGH JAMES CARNEY, AND MICHAEL GERARD CARNEY, EACH AS HIS OR HER OWN SEPERATE ESTATE, AS TO THE REMAINDER (SEE NOTE 3 AND 5) SCHEDULE "B" A) Note No. 4 is deleted. EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS REPORTED HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS N 0 T BEEN RE-EXAMINED. ---END--- MSN: ENCLOSURES : TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N. E. P.O. BOX 1493 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 Prepared for: Transamerica No. 864180 Customer Reference: 95180916 TRANSAMERICA NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. Seller CARNEY 1200 6TH AVE. Buyer/Borrower TBD SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attn: CAROL GARNER By -1'lA<ft L �/ . 2- 1 / c For service on this order call : (206) 646-8589/1-800-441-7.701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P . CAMPBELL or MARK S . NIKLASON (FAX # (206) 646-8593 ) SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1 TO THE FIRST COMMITMENT ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes which impact title to property set forth in the above-referenced commitment . Effective Date: JUNE 15, 1995 SCHEDULE "B" • A) Paragraph No. 9 is deleted. EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS REPORTED HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS N 0 T BEEN RE-EXAMINED. ---END--- BW/jkl ENCLOSURES: Sketch All recorded encumbrances • TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 320 108TH AVENUE N. E. P.O. BOX 1493 BELLEVUE, WA 98009 Prepared for: Transamerica No. 864180 Customer Reference: 95180916 TRANSAMERICA NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. --- Seller Carney 1200 6TH AVE. Buyer/Bo rower -- SEATTLE, WA 98101 ' Attn: VALERIE PRATT By --. 2'4'2, ' •�- • For se vice on � i� is order call : (206) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S . NIKLASON (FAX # (206) 646-8593) SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: March 28 , 1995 at 8 : 00 A.M. 1 . Policy or policies to be issued: Amount Alta Owner' s Policy TO BE DETERMINED Premium (SEE NOTE Standard Policy Tax Proposed Insured: TO BE DETERMINED Total (SEE NOTE 2 . Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: • THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF MAY M. PERICH, DECEASED, AS TO THAT PORTIO1 LYING WITHIN TRACT 10 OF SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS OF RENTON SHORE LANDS; AND MARION CARNEY, ALSO APPEARING OF RECORD AS E. MARION CARNEY AND THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF HUGH F. CARNEY, DECEASED, AS TO THE REMAINDER (SEE NOTES 3 , 4 AND 5) 3 . The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-010-82 , OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SURVEY RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8211239011 , BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 10 AND TRACTS 10 AND 1:: OF RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL, ALL IN SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 2; NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. ; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON . Order No. 864180 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS . Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if an created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subseque to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. C. Special exceptions : 1 . Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82 . 4 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is . 0178 . 2 . General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 182305-9071-03 1995 $1 , 746 . 71 $ 0 . 00 $1, 746. 71 The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1995 . 3 . Conservation (CON) service charge, as follows, together with interes penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 182305-9071-03 1995 $ 1 . 25 $ 0 . 00 $ 1. 25 4 . Liability for surface water management (SWM) service charges, if any which are not presently assessed, but may appear on future rolls . 5 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE: Storm drain and sanitary sewer AREA AFFECTED: The unplatted shorelands of the first class and bed of the Black River channe as described therein DATED: November 14 , 1962 RECORDED: November 28 , 1962 RECORDING NO. : 5512374 Page 2 Order No. 864180 6 . Reservation contained in deed from the State of Washington recorded under Recording No. 5646861 and 7306060499 , reserving to the grantor all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc. , and the right c entry for opening, developing and working the same, and providing tl such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made foi full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry. Right of State of Washington or its successors, subject to payment c compensation therefor, to acquire rights-of-way for private railroad skid roads, flumes, canals, water courses or other easements for transporting and moving timber, stone, minerals and other products from this and other property, as reserved in deed referred to above . 7 . AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: Owners AND: City of Renton DATED: July 16 , 1982 RECORDED: November 23 , 1982 RECORDING NO. : 8211239011 REGARDING: Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA-010-82 8 . MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: MORTGAGOR: Hugh Carney and Marion Carney, husband and wife MORTGAGEE: First Federal Savings & Loan Associatic of Renton, a corporation LOAN NO. : --- BRANCH: --- ADDRESS : --- ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $236 , 600 . 00 DATED: December 20, 1978 RECORDED: December 26, 1978 RECORDING NO. : 7812260321 (Covers portion of property herein described) 9 . DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Hugh Carney and Marion Carney, his wife TRUSTEE: Pioneer National Title Insurance Compan a corporation BENEFICIARY : May Perich, as her separate estate LOAN NO. : --- BRANCH: --- ADDRESS: 240 Rainier Avenue S . , Renton, WA 9805 ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $80, 000. 00 DATED: December 20, 1978 RECORDED: December 26 , 1978 RECORDING NO. : 7812260320 (Covers portion of property herein described and other property) Page 3 Order No. 864180 SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BY AGREEMENT DATED: December 20, 1978 RECORDED: December 27 , 1978 RECORDING NO. : 7812270511 The above deed of trust was made subordinate to the mortgage recorde under Recording No. 7812260321, set forth at paragraph 8 herein. QUIT CLAIM OF EXECUTOR AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Ivan Nass, as Executor of the Estate of May M. Perich, deceased GRANTEE: Josephine Stewart, Beatrice Nass and George Vedos, each as their sole and separate property, an undivided 1/3 of the security interest DATED: February 5 , 1985 RECORDED: February 8 , 1985 RECORDING NO. : 8502080552 10 . MATTERS SET FORTH BY SURVEY: DATED: February 15 , 1979 RECORDED: March 22 , 1979 RECORDING NO. : 7903229005 DISCLOSES: Possible encroachment onto the property adjoining on the North by a motel building NOTE 1: The Company may have further requirements if the amount to be insures: exceeds the current assessed valuation. ' NOTE 2 : Title is to vest in persons not yet revealed, and when so vested, wil be subject to matters disclosed by a search of the records against their names. • NOTE 3 : Any instrument should be executed in the name of E. Marion Carney, wh acquired title as Marion Carney, in order to impart constructive notice. NOTE 4 : Hugh F. Carney died August 1, 1990 . Non intervention will admitted August 24 , 1992 . In King County Probate Case No. 91-4-00402-9 E. Marion Carney is authorized individually and as personal respresentative to sell and convey, or contract to sell and convey , said property, for an entire monetary consideration. Attorney for th estate: Marijean Moschetto Page 4 Order No. 864180 NOTE 5 : May M. Perich died August 20, 1984 , survived by Josephine Stewart, Beatrice Nass and George Vedos. Non-intervention will admitted September 25, 1984 . In King County Probate Case No. 84-4-03248-8 , Ivan Nass was authorized as executor to sell and convey or contract sell and convey said property for an entire monetary consideration; however, said Tract 10 was not distributed. Attorney for the estate was John K. Pain, Jr. END OF EXCEPTIONS Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. BW/jkl ENCLOSURES: Sketch All recorded encumbrances Page 5 R.Z//-131 cV/ 3v93 -_ - • • --f--77-4 •'•r•'1 r f w-.'CA S (. t:lo'w re...,a., S•-..ate-e :r 5--.) 3Za i� • I«��1 b SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPELIE fj/W -� I 1 . /- . I .- -- .-a:c I I ` '= , - -- - --- . W il i i ¢ L ,I • C (.ll j ill ., v < ✓1e/rtr.. rn 2 1.a,. I r / "'T I • • I ,.. i l ' 1 _ __ _._ . _ 1 ,C h A !. SUBJECT PROPERTY `'ct, ... - t � 1�) `\' l [R1// l I �7 uI-r'i77f'n• / • I APPROVALS / j ”-•rS PI Cccc O1S�r�Kv 311,Av•.•u0 D 00.:....��r / / V J • Co• ri s.oc M'...7).e Orr 1,...ry a, .CC✓rn.t /..-.a•t.,.[..o AerrocoI a.71 o-c,/f-.nr.....�.co./isz / ..7�I....dZ---t-r.•cV....... !.•••./1^A. of..••<n r 0 r J Al. C."'d,QC.l AD,/I S l I ( KCA5 l..�..., 12.�. /1"-1l't^rt.-.--:1....... d.ssoc..A":ASi1+71 A..aa..c.I..,70--.-.G Oers wi .. AtS/A-f l..✓,✓/0 1....flier.-rs r.n,t 1�••'CY,�w(..4 D.r16I 1.4+1-eq II../.41c ;:, ..3,T:CI n ,r,... Co...,r' AX ( a,.,/rr .uxrlo.c CITY OF RENTON LLA- 010 -t32 SURVE(ORS CERTIFICATE • _ T.Y,1 A!+ Cori 1 cr."- aInf Lsl,.'r7 A .h•r,rr l-C4-i,A-M Ck 14..o..c ��.'./,t'!rN✓.DYI!!..C1.rLC ICJ•!BSc Nr ne,C ../a.Ca. ....•.,a ,•'..TLr F•a.+,..•1,7 O- A. 5....r + �y .^n so.r rise /ci...v.! x4.5-/ fear- R,4 e...• .,r-.tr P.. na rIr O' ri.-es-/ C—.c.re/.,..V.r /1lZ • .j .4 �,f pi r Or Fitr/CW Q•Tii f[ ,.i,''r Cr-T).r.51.,Cr St coo,/ /e 1 � �,P < To../s r.-41 A.4xr; .C.../.t1 S L.cr! Il't f• This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en- croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any mazer related to this sketch. References should be inadc to an accuratr survey for further information. APR-10-1998 12:25 P.002/011 P'it 1♦ VVJ 1 JJ 1 GIW'W J I I\I,Jt i 1 I ILL 1\Ltil.l I t,VI TJ I t W 1 •�n••••• ...r L.\v•v •v� TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.L. 29TH PLACE BELLEVVUTE, WA 98007 Prepared for: Trar8aMerica No. : 864177 Customer Reference: 95180913 TRANSNATION NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. Seller - Lohr 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Buyer/B ower Saf ay SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attri: KATE MCCUSKER By tit For ser ce on to or er call: (206) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S. NIKLASON (FAX 0(206) 646-8593) SUPPLEMENTAL NO. ' 1 TO THE SECOND COMMITMENT ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes which impact title to property set forth in the above-referenced commitment. Effective Date: April 8, 1997 at 8:00 A.M. SCHEDULE "B" A) Paragraph Nos. 14, 15, 16, 17 and 19 are deleted. EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS REPORTED HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS N 0 T BEEN RE-EXAMINED. DPC APR. 10 ' 98 (FRI) 11 :22 COMMUNICATION ND :20 PAGE. 2 APR-10-1998 12:25 P.003i011 nrm—rJ r-1 7;r 11•0,D rr[Ui'1 1 L / NHL KV 1 L TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: 7'ransnation No. : 864177 Customer Reference: 95180913 TRANSNATION NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. • Seller : Lohr 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Buyer/ r owe : Safe • y SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attn: KATE MCC JSKER By 4/ For "woe on-th r call: (206) 646-8589/1-.00-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S. NIXLASON (FAX #(206) 646-8593) SECOND COMMITMENT ScHEDU1JE A EFFEcTIvE DATE: April 3, 1997 at 8100 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount Alta Owner's Policy $360,000.00 PremiUM 81,090.00 Standard Policy Tax 93.74 Proposed Insured: SAFEWAY INC. , A DELAWARE .CORPORATION Total $1,183.74 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in maid land is at the effective data hereofvested in: RALPH LOHR, MILOMAE SMITH, LAVOR REEVES AND IAVONNE COLLINS, EACH AN UNDIVIbED 1/4 INTEREST, EACH AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE 3. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: Sae "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" APR. 10 ' 98 (FRI) 11 :23 COMMUNICATION Nc :20 PAGE. 3 1PR-10-1998 12:25 P.004/011 order No. 864177 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. , DESCRIBED AS; BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF STATI'UCK AVENUE (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 3RD STREET (FORMERLY 3RD AVENUE) ; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 300. 00 FEET; TH]NCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST 250.00 FELT TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES SO SECONDS WEST 218.36 FE:3T TO A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 30 FEET EASTERLY FROM (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO) THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 14, RENTON SHORELANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS; THENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 216.17 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE PIPE LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN 176.94 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 01 DE.3REES 19 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEL'INNING- THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 21.1.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS1 BEGINNING AT A POINT SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 300. 00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPE LINE, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 2 APR. 10 ' 98 (FRI) 11 ,23 COMMUNICATION No :20 PAGE. 4 APR-10-1998 12:25 P.005/011 nrr.-�r-1�ar L1•ioa rru;•i ,. ILt-MtLtr'I1UP1bI 1U 7NAL SERVIC P.04 Order No, 864177 SCHEDULE B REQVIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS. schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. C. Special exceptions: 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 62.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is .0178. 2. General Taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 000720-0211-04 1997 $13,526.06 $ .00 $13,526.06 The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1997. 3. Conservation (CON) service charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Dalanae 000720-0211-04 1997 $ 1.25 $ .00 $ 1.25 4. Liability for surface water management (SWM) service charges, if any, which are not presently assessed, but may appear on future rolls. Page 3 APR. 10 ' 9e (FRI) 11 :23 COMMUNICATION Nc : 20 PAGE APR-10-199e 12:26 P.006/011 Hrr-v_ r-1' 1 r l l ta4 rKU11 . i . . .LE-FECEFT I ONST TO ), . ,;JAL EER+J I C P.05 • order No. 864177 5, EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 5512374 PURPOSE: Sanitary sewer and storm drain AREA AFFECTED: That portion if any, of property herein described, as described therein 6. Reservations contained in deed recorded under Recording No. 2595089, substantially as follows: The Grantor is to retain 1/2 of the mineral and oil or gas right(s) underlying the above property (Covers Westerly portion Of property herein described and other property, except portion within Tract 14 of Renton Shorelanda Second Supplemental) 7. Reservation contained in deed from the State of Washington recorded under Recording No. 7210100647, reserving to the grantor all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc. and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such .entry. Right of State of Washington or its successors{ subject to payment of compensation therefor, to acquire rights-of-way for private railroads, Skid roads, flumes, canals, water courses or other easements for transporting and moving timber, stone, minerals and other products from this and other property, as reserved in deed referred to above. (Covers portion of property herein described, if any, and other property) • $. Easement conditions imposed by instrument recorded on March 9, 1973, under Recording No. 7303090378. 9. LEASE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR: Eileen collman, a widow LESSEE: Safeway Stores, Incorporated, a Maryland corporation FOR A TERM OF: 20 years DATED: August 14, 1972 RECORDED: October 26, 1972 RECORDING NO. : 7210260369 Lessor's interest in the lease is now held of record by: Ralph Lehr, Milomae Smith, Lavor Reeves and LaVonne Collins Pursuant to: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 8712240383. Page 4 APR. 10 ' 98 (FRI) 11 .24 COMMUNICATION Nc . 20 PAGE. 6 APR-10-1998 12:26 P.007i011 Hr'K—ki 1—177( 11;N4 I—KUM r►t Lt—KtCtF 1 l Gt I f TO t+lE 'IRL SERV I C Order No. 864177 Lessee's interest in the lease was assigned by instrument. Assignee: Redwine & Sherrill, a. California general partnership Recording No. : Instrument recorded under Recording No. 7407110329. 10. MEMORANDUM OF LEASE: LESSOR: Redwine & Sherrill, a California general partnership LESSEE: Safeway Stores, Incorporated, a DATED: Maryland corporation RECORDED: May 1, 1974 July 11, 1974 RECORDING NO. : 7407110330 11. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Redwine and Sherrill, a California general partnership TRUSTEE: Pioneer National Title Insurance compBENEVacIARY: ' The Lincoln National Life Xnsuranco Company LOAN NO. : BRANCH: ADDRESS: 1301 South Harrison Street, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46B01 ORIGINAL AMOUNT: S480,000.00 DATED: June 15, 1974 RECORDED: July 11, 1974 RECORDING NO. : 7407110331 12, ASSIGNMENT Or LEASE FOR SECURITY PURPOSES AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR'S INTEREST ASSIGNED TO: The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, a corporation BY ASSIGNMENT RECORDED: July 11, 1974 RECORDING NO. : 7407110332 Said arraignment given as additional security for the deed of trust recorded under Recording No. 7407110331, shown at paragraph u. herein. 13. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE FOR SECURITY PURPOSES AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR'S INTEREST ASSIGNED TO: The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, a corporation BY ASSIGNMENT RECORDED: July 11, 1974 RECORDING NO. : . 7407110333 Said assignment given as additional security for the deed of trust recorded under Recording No. 7407110331, shown at paragraph 11 herein. Page 5 APR. 10 ' 98 (FRI) 11 :24 COMMUNICATION Nc : 20 PAGE. ? APR-10-1993 12:26 P.008i011 rn v i-a r a i•�� rr'LTA rN 1 l t-r tF I t Ufvb I IU �L JNiRL SERV I C P.07 Order No. 864177 14. UNRECORDED LEASE: LESSOR: Not disclosed LESSEE: Chuoi Ong, doing business as DATE: Renton Food Circus DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 9106060833 (Covers 200 South 3rd St.) 15. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: Chuoi Ong, doing business as Renton Food Circus AND: Washington Natural Gas Company DATED: April 26, 1991 RECORDED: Juno 6, 1991 RECORDING NO. : 9106060833 REGARDING: Natural gas appliance commercial lease agreement (water heater) (Covers 200 South 3rd St.) 16. UNRECORDED LEASE: LESSOR: Not disclosed LESSEE: A & H Stores, Inc. DATE: --- DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 850806111E (Covers 200 south 3rd St. ) 17. FINANCING STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: SECURED PARTY: Old National Bank of Washington DEBTOR: A & H Stores Inc. COVERS: Personal property and fixtures located on the property herein described RECORDED: August 6 1985 RECORDING NO. : 8508061115 ASSIGNMENT AND CONTINUATION OF FINANCING STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ASSIGNEE: U.S. Bank of Washington, National Association; 1414 4th Avenue, . Seattle, WA 98101 RECORDED: May 2, 1990 RECORDING NO. : 9005020293 CONTINUATION OF FINANCING STATEMENT: RECORDED: February 10, 199E RECORDING NO. : 9502100294 18. Any questions that may arise relative to the location of the South margin of City of Seattle pipe line right-of-Tway referenced in the captioned legal description. Page 6 APR. 1C ' 98 (FRI) 11 , 24 COMMUNICATION No . 20 PAGE. ^o APR-10-1998 12:27 P.009i011 JNHL StKVIL F. • Order No. 864177 19. FINANCING STATE' AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: SECURED PARTY: Old National Bank DEBTOR; A is H Stores, Inc. CovERS: Personal property and fixtures located on the property herein described RECORDED: February 24, 1983 RECORDING NO. : #302240917 CONTINUATION OF FINANCING STATEMENT: RECORDED: December 24, 1987 RECORDING NO. : 8712240750 ASSIGNMENT AND CONTINUATION OP FINANCING STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ASSIGNEE: U.S. Bank of Washington, National Association RECORDED: November 4, 1992 RECORDING NO. _ 9211040863 20. The land does not have a recorded easement that provides access. This policy provides coverage for loss due to a lack of a right of access, but the policy does not insure against loss related to the location, width, quality, maintenance or extent of use of any particular access method or road that may actually be used for ingress and egress to the land. 21. Unrecorded leaseholds, it any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on .personal property installed upon Said property; and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at - the oxplration of the term. 22. Matters affecting security interests in personal property which may be disclosed by a. search of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) records at the Washington State Department of Licensing in Olympia. NOTE 1: We note survey on adjoining property recorded under Recordin No. 7601120367, show ng Tri,-Angular portion of Tract 14 within Parcel 8 of property herein described NOTE 2; There may be uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Security interests filed with the Department of Licensing in Olympia, affecting personal property, crops or agricultural facilities which are not covered by the policy to issue. Page 7 APR 10 ' 96 (FRI) 11 :25 COMMUNICATION N_ : 20 PAGE. 9 APR-10-1998 12:27 P.010/011 rirr—v r—i:=r rruri r- ILt—trtl.tH 11UN5I TO � JNAL SERVIC P.09 • Order No. 864177 END OF EXCEPTIONS Investigation should be made to determine it there are any service, installation, maintenance or aonatruction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation tee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. DPC ENCLOSURES: Sketch paragraphs 9, 10 and 13 • • Page 8 • APR. 10 98 (FRI) 11 : 25 COMMUNICATION No :20 PAGE 10 • APR-10-1998 12:27 P.011/011 - •• . ..J 17 r 1.i•r-,o rrvu:'i ,i ILL—MCLti'-'1 t UN;i I U JNI,L SERA C P.10 • 'T 1:417Q • `t .. I r.r at I •c et".. 7� . ,• C/ �i 4,.•• fire- 4,•...w 'a to , 1 ' rY of .►. •”.\.si:1 .•1A ~ • JIO.•• R w » Tr3.,.. rw• ,r u.., • f Nair i •' pv 1 10 _ p r. Z.Io it +f iy�/ci '. , / tD Ir ' f,, i t . ' ,, 'r,l. _ t -r \-ia..1..,. +s M., tr r i t . iIgrA .:, cN.si .• 4 • F ' r ' • b �1/?I Q (. i T 1' •�r�Or'' ' 1I • •} 4,,,-,0- / ,,L,,,,,i . . 0 El.. .Nic.O. . . -1:-red:.• "' S. THIRD ST .•i +twJ R '„` C'f• (Fib •,POO * NO.of 4 T �`' `° ,fir*. • o` , O N T, j j,/111.# i^(4' , r •y 4_A�O * V 4 tit f Q X�1 a�+ T V p • Qom.// --I 4: 7- 1 v .v,w rrs at ♦il :.iN ,A4 ' iN co•v \L AI 9 L. t t ,. S�•� a 7 A Y, I M e 1_ --r •4.�ntr�1 t,~ ♦ b ... �_:�, S. 3RII -A^ ..�--�.-'-`7 P•o';` •''7 e0 2 .;,. If i.\......_.ro or •j1 M ' 4 I. i°'. �• r6° ICI.,. c '. S2 1 -h ,,, .,..--- w . , 1 If . This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intrnded to show all matters related co the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en• croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commiuma t or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related as this TUTi=iL F'.011 APR 10 ' 9$ (FR1) 11 :25 COMMUNICATION No :20 PAGE. 11 Pacific Northwest Title "Your Locally Owned Title Company" Parcel ID:000720 0119 Bldg: 1 Total :$779,700 Owner :Safeway Inc Land :$637,800 CoOwner Struct :$141, 900 Site Addr:200 S 3rd St Renton 98055 %Imprvd : 18 Mail Addr:15350 SW Sequoia Pkwy #300 Portland Or 97224Levy Cd :2100 Sale Date: Doc# 1998 Tax :$10,277.37 SalePrice: Deed Phone . Loan Amt : Type: Vol: 905 Pg:35 Use Code :252 COM,RETAIL STORE, 10K-25K SQFT MapGrid :656 B3 Zoning Ca NbrhdCd :530000 Prop Desc:A&w Drug & Heritage Book Store -- CENSUS -- Legal :TOBIN H H-D C # 37 BEG 88 FT W OF Tract :253.00 :NW COR OF SMITHERS 5TH ADD TH W Block :5 :ALG 3RD AVE 212 FT TO TPOB TH E QSTR :SE 18 23N05E PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms : 1st Floor SF Year Built :1958 Bath Full: 2nd Floor SF Eff Year :1965 Bath 3/4 : Half Floor SF Bldg Matl :Masonry Bath 1/2 : AboveGrnd SF Bldg Cond . Other Rms: Bsmnt Finished : Bldg Grade :Avg Dining Rm: Bsmnt Total SF : Interior . Fireplace: Building SqFt : 15,727 Wall Matl . Appliance: Lease SqFt :13, 932 Insulation . Deck DeckSqFt HeatSource . Laundry Carport SqFt Heat Type :Forced Porch Garage Type Air Method . Pool Attached GrgSF : EletricSvc . Spa Detached GrgSF : Wtr Source . Sauna Bsmnt ParkingSF: Sewer Type . Stories :1 Basement Type Purpose . Units Basement Grade : Nuisance .• LAND INFORMATION OTHER INFORMATION St Access:Std Lot SqFt :79,730 St Surface Soundproof . Beach Acc: Lot Acres: 1.83 Tennis Storage . WtrFront : Lot Shape:Irregular Elevator :No Curb/Gutter : WtrFntLoc: Tde/Upind: Sprinklers :No Sidewalk . WtrFrntFT: Topogrphy: Security St Light . GroundCvr: TopoProbd: Golf Adj . VIEWS:Mountain: Lake/Rvr: Puget: City: Lk Wa/Sam: TRANSFER HISTORY OWNERS DATE / DOC # PRICE DEED LOAN TYPE The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. 1998 12: 15 FROM TNT (BELLEI'LE) COMMERCIAL TO TIIT-t1T= F 0-3 -111ANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE II S Iti BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: Transnation No. 864178 TRANSNATION NAT'L SERVICES Customer Reference: 95180914 Escrow No • 1200 6TH AVE_ , STE. 1910 Seller First Int. SEATTLE, WA 98101 Buyer/B rower Safgway Attn: CAROL GARNER By /lam „/4". /, • For� vice on s or tr call: (425) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S. NIKLASoN (FAX #(425) 646-8593) SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1. TO THE SECOND COMMITMENT 11TTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes which impact title to property set forth in the above-referenced commitment. Effective Date: March 23 , 1998 at 8 : 00 A.M. SCHEDULE "A" The Owner's policy coverage is changed as follows : ALTA Owner's Policy $865 , 000 . 00 Premium $2 , 115 . 00 Extended Policy Tax $ 181 . 89 Premium $ 635 . 00 Proposed Insured: Tax $ 54 . 61 SAFEWAY, INC. , A DELAWARE CORPORATION Total $2 , 986 . 50 SCHEDULE "B" A) The following is added as Paragraph 15: Matters relating to questions of survey, rights of parties in possession, and unrecorded liens for labor or material. An ALTA "as-built" survey must be furnished to this company which shows the location of all improvements and reveals all encroachments, driveways and easements which encumber the property. We will review the survey and make an inspection of the premises, and will report the results of both the review and the inspection by supplemental report. B) Note No. 1 is deleted. FROM PH iE.ELLE UEi CUMMERCIHL TO THT-HT=, P.c3 03 Order No . 864178 EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS REPORTED HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS N 0 T BEEN RE-EXAMINED. ---END--- DPC • Page 2 TCITHL P.i=i , f TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N. E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: Transnation No. 864178 Customer Reference: 95180914 TRANSNATION NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. Seller r First Int. 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Buyer/B rower� a Safeway SEATTLE, WA 98101 � �/ Attn: CAROL GARNER By / •j. i For s rvice on this order call : (425) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL or MARK S . NIKLASON (FAX # (425) 646-8593) SECOND COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A gy,600EFFECTIVE DATE: March 9 , 1998 at 8 : 00 A.M. Ot1w� (`{�1 �� ICI gC 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount ALTA Owner's Policy TO BE DETERMINED Premium (SEE NOTE 1) Standard Policy Tax Proposed Insured: -1-6'0(',A (0,35.L() SAFEWAY INC. , A DELAWARE CORPORATION v4- SDI (r Total (SEE NOTE 1) 2 . Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF WASHINGTON N.A. , A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION 3 . The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION: " )C. , , (ks. 1,rt./a LJ\J U 1 S - ' APR-09-1998 16:58 P.002/002 Order No. 864178 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE H.H. TOBIN CLAIM NO. 37, AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT 14 OF RENTON SHORELANDS, SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, ALL SITUATED IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH (FORMERLY SHATTUCK STREET) AND THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH THIRD STREET (FORMERLY THIRD AVENUE) , THE SAME BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°40'50" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 300. 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01°19 '10" EAST 250.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°40'50" WEST 219 .46 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 30 FEET EASTERLY FROM (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 14 OF SAID RENTON SHORELANDS; THENCE NORTH 12°20'05" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 216 . 34 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTH 88°19'25" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 30. 53 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 14 ; THENCE SOUTH 12°20'05" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 245.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 254 . 69 FEET FOR A DISTANCE OF 87 . 46 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 57°59 '28" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 88°40'50" EAST 8.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O1°19' 10" WEST 140. 00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH THIRD STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88°40'50" EAST 277 . 50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED LAKE AVENUE SOUTH ADJOINING, PURSUANT TO CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4640 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9611150135; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREO, `IF ANY, LYING EASTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED As: 4 �.� BEGINNING AT A POINT SOUTH 89°47'00" WEST 300.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMITHERS FIFTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00°13 '0g'" WEST TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE CEDAR RIVER PIPE LINE, AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; i SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 2 APR. 09 ' 98 (THU) 15:55 COMMUNICATION No : 50 PAGE. 2 i Order No. 864178 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. C. Special exceptions : 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82 . 45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is . 0178 . 2 . General Taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) T� 1L� Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance ap4. Olt RLaS 000720-0004-05 1998 $6, 471 . 45 $ . 00 $6 , 471 . 45 A0 ,4I40 — 000720-0212-03 1998 $ 700. 90 $ . 00 $ 700 . 90 ,,1 J -- 722950-0140-00 1998 $ 785 . 22 $ . 00 $ 785 . 22 The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1998 . , 3 . Conservation (CON) service charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1 ; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 000720-0004-05 1998 $5 . 00 $0 . 00 $5. 00 000720-0212-03 1998 $5 . 00 $0. 00 $5 . 00 722950-0140-00 1998 $5 . 00 $0 . 00 $5 . 00 4 . Liability for surface water management (SWM) service charge, if any, which are not presently assessed, but may appear on future rolls. Page 3 Order No. 864178 5 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 5512374 PURPOSE: Sanitary sewer and storm drain AREA AFFECTED: As described therein 6 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Safeway Stores, Incorporated, a Maryland corporation PURPOSE: Underground storm drain line, sanitary sewer line, domestic water line and a sprinkler water line AREA AFFECTED: Strip of land 5 feet in width on either side of the storm drain line, sanitary sewer line, domestic water line and sprinkler water line as said lines are shown on the attached plot plan dated February 22 , 1973 DATED: February 28 , 1973 RECORDED: March 9 , 1973 RECORDING NO. : 7303090378 7 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 9005040732 PURPOSE: Power pole and wires AREA AFFECTED: The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described 8 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 9005040732 PURPOSE: Gas line AREA AFFECTED: The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described 9 . Reservations contained in deed from the State of Washington recorded under Recording No. 7210100647 , reserving to the grantor all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc. , and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same, and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry. Page 4 r' , Order No. 864178 Right of the State of Washington or its successors, subject to payment of compensation therefor, to acquire rights-of-way for private railroads, skid roads, flumes, canals, water courses or other easements for transporting and moving timber, stone, minerals and other products from this and other land, as reserved in deed referred to above. (Covers portion in Tract 14 of Renton Shorelands, Second Supplement and other property) 10. Reservations contained in deed recorded under Recording No. 2595089, substantially as follows: The Grantor is to retain 1/2 of the mineral and oil or gas right (s) underlying the above property. (Covers portion of property herein described and other property, lying Easterly of Tract 14 of Renton Shorelands Second Supplemental) 11. Possible encroachments listed on Exhibit "B" to deed recorded under Recording No. 9005040732 . 12 . Any questions that may arise relative to the location of the South margin of City of Seattle Cedar River pipeline right-of-way referenced in the captioned legal description. 13 . Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the k land; and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. 14 . Easement for utility and related purposes in favor of the City of Renton as disclosed by Ordinance No. 4640, recorded under Recording No. 9611150135 . N TE l: TH OMPANY HAS BEEN ASKED TO ISSUE AN OWNER'S POLICY WITHOUT DIS OSURE OF THE LIABILITY AMOUNT. THIS COMMITMENT SHALL BE EFF CTIVE ONLY WHEN THE AMOUNT OF THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR HAS BE • INSERTED IN SCHEDULE A, HEREOF. THE FORTHCOMING POLICY MU T E ISSUED IN AN AMOUNT AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE FULL VALUE OF TH ESTATE INSURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR RATING SCHEDULE O FIL IN THE OFFICE OF THE WASHINGTON STATE INSURANCE MMISS NER. NOTE 2 : Previously deleted . NOTE 3 : There may be Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Security interests filed with the Department of Licensing in Olympia affecting personal property, crops or agricultural facilities which are not covered by the policy to issue. NOTE 4 : We note survey recorded on said property under Recording No. 7601120367 . Page 5 Order No. 864178 END OF EXCEPTIONS Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. DPC ENCLOSURES: Sketch Paragraph 14 Page 6 RECEIVED FEB 2 3 1C�,8 BAYLIS BRAND WAGNER ARCHITECTS PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR SAFEWAY STORE NO. 1563 LOCATED BETWEEN SOUTH 2ND STREET& SOUTH 3RD STREET EAST OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH IN RENTON, WASHINGTON BY BUSH, ROED &HITCHINGS, INC. 2009 MINOR AVENUE EAST SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98102 (206) 323-4144 FAX: (206) 323-7135 BRH JOB NO. 96298.01 FEBRUARY 19, 1998 p Ciry °W REN o,VI,VG � �G. .�� pc�AY �4 1998 ft.. t="C "iiir, '-�s � 2�0703 ,..� c,� General Narrative The new Safeway site is located near the Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South And South 3rd Street. It is the intention of the owner to demolish the existing Safeway store, plus A & H Drugstore, plus other existing shops within the development area. The total site area to be developed is 5.50 acres with about 2 .32 acres of the existing site being pervious and 3 .18 acres being impervious. In the developed condition the total pervious area will be about 0. 28 acres and the total impervious area will be about 5. 22 acres, of the 5. 22 acres, 1. 53 acres constitute the building roof areas. Since the roof area flows need not have water quality treatment, it is our intention to allow the 1.53 acres of roof area to by- pass the underground storage detention vault, and size the discharge orifices from the vault such that the total peak discharge from the by-pass plus tank discharge is either equal to or less than the existing peak flow rates. A small area of the site constituting about 0.50 acres between the new Safeway store and Gene's Restaurant will not be considered in the calculations since it will not be disturbed during the new construction. Discharge from the storm detention vault will go into an existing 24-inch storm drain flowing southwest across the west part of the site. The detention vault will also have a wet sump to provide water quality treatment for the 3 .97 acres of parking lot area flowing to it. The flow continues southwest to a manhole near the intersection of Rainier Avenue South and South 3rd Street. At this point the pipe size increases from the 24" RCP pipe to a 60" X 36" CMP arch pipe. The flow continues westward along Sunset Boulevard West to Hardie Avenue, where the piping system turns south. The piping system continues south to the south side of the existing railroad right-of-way. The flow turns southwestward to SW 7th Street. At this point, the pipe size increases from a 60" X 36" CMP arch pipe to a 54" RCP pipe flowing westward along SW 7th Street. 96298 ' ' RUSH,ROED&HITCHING; -2. JOe 34-idOld y St;6 ' re CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND,,urtVEYORS lim / 2009 Minor Avenue East SHEET NO. // � OF Seattle,WA 98102 CALCULATED BY :ea /� DATE (206)323-4144 BRH (206)323-7135 •Fax CHECKED BY DATE SCALE aka ti � /CSC AdAl5 l/ ' 1/2. x 2521x 37 4. li x 524....x /b ? 44/ $�f- ...._._...__..._.......... ._ z X ,330 0ih � 6 /A. X .34rk 2 Vg.g : __, _ _ _.._ 4 ' OZx ...1 7l x -7: e3�. 9 /1_ x A.. s 36¢ X ' /36 v 4.. �.._........ f3 4f Z.....a5F 0 Sf.a . ,k es ji...d1.414 .......gai.......1.,:171,i1 _ /I i //2->< "ib X / 2-4- 7-. . 1Glla 4.7� 3..... '1 t ,...-1. r K ?/ ,Y ` ... _ /1_ x /31 x 3 / : _ Z15� . .4 //4 / 3 X 5-9 7_ V..I-x x 1 . ?G G .4a _ '/2-- f 1 X 29E n247x 3o 6,2 10 l z x g 5' x ¢2 = 17g. ii :3/0 x ir — 2 _. _....._._ .... it 3.5— xAo /D/ PRODUCT 201-I(S.�yr SA*s12B I F II ` V!i' e 4 t ,I 3 7r...__. / S Amint..GoanMassDtmTnMwarucraimR:uv e.� �j BUSH,ROED&HITCIIINGS, !. JOB See5*-f.W• •1,'" --4-1-0 : ---- 7;$41 f4 29g ) CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND---VEYORS 2. priu 2009 Minor Avenue East SHEET NO. OF 7/111.sta. Seattle,WA 98102 CALCULATED BY 1 :2Q.k../ DATE 3,•=6.1".. (206)323-4144 BRH (206)323-7135•Fax CHECKED BY DATE SCALE . . . i . „ : • •••••••• j. ap7411.kei . PCKsitOws tifeef — Z/Z Z At rPS --. e ciy--=.-s-cd-• 5 N 1101 ,31' ------ , is Ahes (.2- c A/---:: fr 4 4 7E, . ,.. S.2 "=.- ZiP /k' 1 , . • a M != /4.49, ('...0,A2r) SO Zig ( /4)6 9 ..M 7 4#/ 41,9•( ) - • q' . C I. 4:45) 1 _ .6 * A, , .. , „...., • , ' , . ._. , . ._, 57 959, , 5 ,,yer,ous ) -ra 0. y F47,4 - iin/1"m:5 rAP Ina ,4ie3 ,...00 elf — /• le 0,10:4' Type 60/ 5 . f 1 r / 53 L a Lb? -- f.Qckes, --;!- r,e, . . f etvem47.s . . , . . . . . . . , .. .. - . + . . : ... .. . ., . ; : . . .. , . ... r- '" 1/29/98 tSush, Roed & Hitchings, Ih .. page 1 SAFEWAY INC. - RENTON, WASH. JOB. NO. 96298 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E02 NAME: 2-YR. EXISTING STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 .50 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .00 inches AREA. . : 2 .32 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 85 .00 TIME OF CONC • 15 .00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 . 18 Acres CN • 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 1 .69 cfs VOL: 0 .62 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: E10 NAME: 10-YR. EXISTING STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 .50 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 2 .32 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN • 85 . 00 TIME OF CONC 15 . 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 .18 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 2 . 74 cfs VOL: 1 .00 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: E100 NAME: 100-YR. EXISTING STORM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 5 .50 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 2 .32 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 85 .00 TIME OF CONC • 15 .00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 .18 Acres CN • 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 3 . 95 cfs VOL: 1 .43 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 1/29/98 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc page 1 SAFEWAY INC. - RENTON, WASH. JOB. NO. 96298 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D0 . 5 NAME: 6-MO. DEV. STORM - MINUS BLDG SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 97 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 1 .28 inches AREA. . : 0 .28 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 80 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 .00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 . 69 Acres CN • 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 1 . 13 cfs VOL: 0 .33 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: D02 NAME: 2-YR DEV. STORM - MINUS BLDG SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 .97 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 0 .28 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 80 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 .00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 . 69 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 1 . 89 cfs VOL: 0 . 56 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: D10 NAME: 10-YR DEV. STORM - MINUS BLDG SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 .97 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 0 .28 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 80 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 .00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 3 . 69 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 2 .85 cfs VOL: 0 .85 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min :'_/29/98 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc page 2 SAFEWAY INC. - RENTON, WASH. JOB. NO. 96298 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID : D100 NAME : 100-YR DEV. ST. - MINUS BLDG SI3UH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 3 . 97 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 28 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 80 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 . 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 3 . 69 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE : 3 . 91 cfs VOL : 1 . 17 Ac-ft TIME : 470 min 1/29/98 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc page 1 SAFEWAY INC. - RENTON, WASH. JOB. NO. 96298 BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D02B NAME: 2-YR. DEV. STORM - FROM BLDGS . SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .53 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .00 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 .00 min CN • 80 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 .00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 1.53 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 0 . 77 cfs VOL: 0 .23 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min BASIN ID: D10B NAME: 10-YR. DEV. STORM - FROM BLDG SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1 .53 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 0 .00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 80 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 .00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 AREA. . : 1 .53 Acres CN • 98 .00 PEAK RATE: 1.15 cfs VOL: 0 .34 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 1/29/98 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc page 1 SAFEWAY INC. - RENTON, WASH. L-OB. NO. 96298 - BASIN SUMMARY EASIN ID: D100B NAME : 100-YR. DEV. STORM - FROM BLDG SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 1 .53 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE USER1 PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 80 . 00 TIME OF CONC • 5 . 00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA A3STRACTION COEFF: 0 . 20 AREA. . : 1 . 53 Acres CN • 98 . 00 PEAK RATE: 1 . 56 cfs VOL: 0 .47 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min 1/29/98 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc page 3 SAFEWAY INC. - RENTON, WASH. JOB. NO. 96298 STAGE STORAGE TABLE RECTANGULAR VAULT ID No. S1 Description: UNDERGROUND DETENTION VAULT Length: 72 .00 ft . Width: 40 . 00 ft . STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Pt- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 100.00 0.0000 0.0000 100.60 1728 0.0397 101.20 3456 0.0793 101.80 5184 0.1190 100.10 288.00 0.0066 100.70 2016 0.0463 101.30 3744 0.0860 101.90 5472 0.1256 100.20 576.00 0.0132 100.80 2304 0.0529 101.40 4032 0.0926 102.00 5760 0.1322 100.30 864.00 0.0198 100.90 2592 0.0595 101.50 4320 0.0992 102.00 5760 0.1322 100.40 1152 0.0264 101.00 2880 0.0661 101.60 4608 0.1058 100.50 1440 0.0331 101.10 3168 0.0727 101.70 4896 0.1124 ZIn we.- ti LA Li- V, It, e ��Q� ived S► - uce i rea / , e frviow5 '}'t'4 , D/ x 3, 6 x 4-3 5-6 -=•-/ 6o 74_ A 444 f S� � �c % ve4 = 7 2 x 4-0 = 28io 3 /' 0 7, 1)0kvr) 6 - Mo . Peve/ope4 s17),-ky) o 33 ik - �f G 4-d, o� �G �,, D, 3 3 X 4-3 6 o 9 J 7 2 x 4-o SG 5; 7) h- 1/29/98 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc page 4 SAFEWAY INC. - RENTON, WASH. JOB. NO. 96298 STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. Dl Description: ORIFICE CONTROL STRUCTURE Outlet Elev: 100 .00 Elev: 98 .00 ft Orifice Diameter: 7 . 7109 in. Elev: 100 .60 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 6 .7734 in. Elev: 100 .90 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 6 .2344 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 100.00 0.0000 100.60 1.2498 101.20 3.3096 101.80 4.5293 100.10 0.5102 100.70 1.7437 101.30 3.5485 101.90 4.6984 100.20 0.7216 100.80 2.0000 101.40 3.7686 102.00 4.8612 100.30 0.8838 100.90 2.2127 101.50 3.9743 100.40 1.0205 101.00 2.7345 101.60 4.1685 100.50 1.1409 101.10 3.0443 101.70 4.3530 • 1/29/98 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc page 5 SAFEWAY INC. - RENTON, WASH. JOB. NO. 96298 LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAR-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2-YR. STORM 1.19 1.89 Si D1 100.55 7 1569.76 10-YR. STORM 2.07 2.85 S1 D1 100.83 8 2397.64 100-YR. STORM 3.12 3.91 51 D1 101.13 9 3250.08 • • File Basin Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 2 & Hitchings, Inc lease 2 .0 Add/subt hydro Divert flow 4 LIST OF HYDROGRAPH VALUES HYD PEAK PEAK TOTAL HYD PEAK PEAK TOTAL NO. RATE TIME VOLUME NO. RATE TIME VOLUME 1 1 .69 480 0 .62 11 0 .77 470 0 .23 2 2 . 74 480 1 .00 12 1 .15 470 0 . 34 3 3 . 95 480 1 .4 13 1 .56 470 0 .47 4 1 . 89 470 0 .56 14 2 . 66 470 0 . 78 5 2 . 85 470 0 . 85 15 3 . 99 470 1 . 19 6 3 .91 470 1 . 17 16 5 .47 470 1 . 64 7 iC 1 .19 500 0 .56 17 1 .65 480 0 . 78 8 Ni. 2 .07 490 0 . 85 18 2 . 66 490 1 . 19 9 41,, 3 .12 490 1 . 17 19 3 .92. 490 1 .64 30 20 0 .50 470 0 .15 .'rsr 4eYleft•_ Available Memory remaining: 180080 bytes Current Data Set Name : U: \WORKS\RAK\96298 ► . 2.. y J ex/517'I //. 2.--le PeV. By dss ,eE 2. to--y. -)(/5T/'Ia- 5.5t) /2 /a -y{� v6v. C,3( .vlA1�) 3. /oo-+y►2. e)(l5T/N4- ..i� 13' /oo-ye Div. /.53 4c, 4 2- - ye £Ev Excc uDEs /4-, 9-it-11 TOTAL c, iv - y e OEi. eo or- / -, 5 4.,Z. ,o0-vFzoGeD 4' /e6 -ye P ' 3,9/ 1G . ct13 raw 7 , Z - e Pea Q M9 'GE 17 , 7+- / 1 TOT>gc. y CEpH! 9��/� �+ I Z 3 . to-y r oe-i, v dr ' ? oi5 0-g 5, lot -y? OEv v40LT 19 . 9 + i 3 /o. 2O, 6-42v. DEv Peo '57vPn1 o-)ec iDes 4,ea• OF -804.'1 s 3,9/ ,4c -etc NOTE 8y 7,a/ d erea e , -t-he peak c/, c4,,y t ra is �� die de 4t who h ✓Q� e /4- 5Pr each o .6 E ./-4 V (3) des/ ti SV✓hn ev4(1-5. w eve Se f' So �'�aa f t-i cJ)5c4 e b r�r� ,-i �s 7� ` d a � ry y �4 -p#s.s/ P ei c 4 GveN 1 (7, �, 9) Cv li en 4 dd e �D e4 ti yc/oo ,-Q/7I 5 61, / 2, /3) 3-0 ve /9e6 k �/o w va des l edge` e e)o soi Wow ei,.oU 4 �� o � less Ay � w �y 14-5' BUSH,ROED&HITCHIN( NC. JOB SQ ji4C. fe zi. CIVIL ENGINEERS &LMW aURVEYORS SHEET NO. OF r".• 2009 Minor Avenue East A.Seattle,WA 98102 CALCULATED BY (206)323-4144 FAX(206)323-7135 CHECKED BY DATE B R H 1-800-935-0508 SCALE 71-et/ /9/4 57) Aaees ex/574ord &014/14041 ifar-V/Pei 5 •=-- 2,3 Arco-v/44_5 PCvdOped C04/74eti l'" 04/1,04,6 = te), 6: 22. 4c. . : • &I5- 41/4 . . , . ! 5A40•Ati:s 0.49 4G, „ . .1liciov1p46 in! , 1714§17X- Qoi c 1"(fr''' Y4titt -rb#91, (-7•Ar'!, , 1(0 (1) CIO (7) (/7 ) 7 Cl ) I ( ) 02:1 40) ) (2 ) 1 Cs (1 9) t( ) f ) ..... • . „ : • r frn Or/OM-Le e.)0 7- . Ca ) ) ' • 1 CPB 9 ) ± (3 ) • ........ . / rep" me pee (1/3 C440' e Mies .......„. ihe.. ‘4.141471) 1/0 e ea G4 6 Q tAC . )14eci,e ( ) ..... ....... lbe4:4 epe•fi- ....... eilsettd4f. hytno$#291,7 0i,etee (7; tai,41 ! died a6 pfof 4/71:..›'$ e•h/elysie..4;pis I2 1$),, Atei • Roo cped h ! oie *IS f4#., me, ca•llsolvp lehr "at **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9801952 Amount : 2 , 515 . 04 04/03/98 13 :25 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #9125 BAYLIS Init : LMN Project # : LUA98-052 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 000720-0211 Site Address : 203 S 2ND ST Total Fees : 2 , 515 . 04 This Payment 2 , 515 . 04 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 515 . 04 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2 , 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 15 . 04 • ., , - n -,t•7.••••trartticiVrirrit.litf.r-kfiLfrhAir I.S74fIVT151M71,-; rlifilE4WFM91:-.rff"VT4447'44r*74'4-ktak.14.°4124141‘'R'TkVICLiiklitill,,.1 i.,-, ..''......... 1"17&1647447174-r"4...117-7- 61111151241.1'. 17''''. k157)k. 4"f ' t,',-... ,.,,_ ,kr;,., -;( :.,„fiy, ' •,-.•.":7.- ..4.0-:,jitzi,..---„IG _ili,..,;.. , : ..-.1t..-%:--4-7, ,,- --i'4.* ,,,.,,2 t .1.--,,,,,,.. -,,,,&-3-.4.," •- - • , . - - 4...,..,...,,; .,T:,:z,,,,,•,..4.7,s.$,,,,,..1*.,...:1,;..440,4::::..:,,,,,i..1,..141r54.i....:1.wez....,,,,,,,:.:1_:...,,,,,,.,-4:rir.:64i-::,*:4,,,:,,,..t.:`,0,4,i:.,..ii4i.::„.:,:k:.4'.71,. ...i_7.,....,..,6...,,,4,4.,...„..te.4..::73,4,..i.::::.,1,..,i '*4!igi.tty.s.,'.. .,,. , ., ..,,. . , •,, / •-.- 11,„;. ' -.^t -.44, - '7.40% ,;„_, . '...vh r ,.../. i 13 'r,222's It ' , 2., • . . ,9, .3 Vt#A' ',1"' ..22,",4,-1.fr' '. 7;', ' . Ir. +It" ., '': ' .,,.'1,-,!.. 2t: '; 44,v? _ol,•. • !•,., ..,,4.''-'6 ::.• !•:.,-24' '?'‘''.0744"L''' 11 „i."1 4.- •s 'Weir.01'Xif..- 1 • ' 1,4 •,i' , .46( ,,. 4..S.C.... I' i , - vc.......,.. A 1.1_ „iv:1k ,. /..... ,,,,, .,;: 0:,1. . • mipt, t. stlif .0' . ...40C,07.42 .., ,N, 3r..,,,,,t F.)i•N‘. .14, . . -• . 4 ,a ir,.%„, .... i ... , , .., , , .9 1 : ,,•-• ...44.2, .4,4,-..:t ,•:,.._ ,: "-.., , (.,--, . ...,..„. .,.... . 'A .„ • • .4 .,,,,,-:-./....1..,, 'V--' ';,411t.r.,..4 -", '4 - -,,, 11 - )14;- " .', '% .,, ‘.45-'mi.,, /. g,- ....";..A.;-.A-- i. -0..-,., • 4 osi. •*-,.. itiv,„ „.i. . .•.4_ r-, ...,,', .:' . .,.., i .e.. 41r 0. ., , , s 4 4,, .:. t.• . ,• :. -.',..(..;,, .r.,. ,,, s, in ...i. .., 4,, _ISPii'. ".r"..'t$4 ' 44#.4t.... , • 4.,,, '..' . 7 ...- - . , .t,e't .,. 1 '.. ,x,..11/t--• ..?,11-, t••• A ,..2,A._ 1 - ,•-- I, • • • ' 1 'f• '1,.. • f is i , .!1;11)1/4,7:1"4 :tio_larf,Fikirr411i4..,'IyFrinniT_I?Vngt:P.,,F,PIVT,*,...F1._...,4P.iffit; .13M9111111001R411M141: . ..., -11::;,:71.:1.4:rrfic- ,AigiMP.V. ,,,,HWII.t.4 .'atl.r.,:1/4 '7. 11,7*917:7 ..,..,. , .i.4,',;,,, , .{,..4 1- , ..1.. r 41 rr• g al . ` . >,'-. :* ,: .t.1-71 4:4 tf14.47e;r:itiT• -,,,L '‘''"-,1*-`*i. ••:.:,..T..7:??•Ti'''',11----'71..,1.itrt...c.- ''' '.''0' .. lit4P7f--.T.C,47- 47,..7-'-4- 0 .,1:13 el- ' ,' iN ,,:.- .,,i,.4.-..,. . ..:,.•....z-,.,4;,,si :,7 _.. ,r,;`;,.,:;t i'.1...- .;,;1,1,- ;I k--,,,„-7,.'%.`,..Y4'4.‘,•"..,.14-T.TY:j.V: .',- : '4';',Z7..„-St AT .`,.'' '.-1.0411 il'•• , . t .•,,> - • - ..kt. , /44,414i to.. i 4. ,toi ,. •,... .. , -,!, ,... 4? .• ..,.11, * 'A •-r.'L • . . • * • •1 • '1, •• IA*", ;4,,. ../--."`I ' 11 ,,-,1: .. 1 :,;i '`;',.., CA 4,, „et::-..'- . , ,i- ... •...,,... . ',114.1r ' "A '.... ts, is . • A , '`.''''' • ".•-•"-'..r.••••**Vt--2.3,;11 . •. ',7.r.A'' *a A.k• .t, .4. • . -•--10' 41.72, 1..},4'' .7,. - - ' -.',.re.. .4, ty'': ....4.-.. 4iT4' .''''1•:4'2':. * 'L ' :-. ' •• ‘>• • -, -%.1 til ; . -:..: Ay -.-.,. ,','!"...:. . ,,,,, , - — 7 aft t' '''''''' 4 - '?$,S.11,-- h .. '•*-•4 . :/ ` ' ;:NI 1-,-V . -'',,,..',;;;..111:4-44';' ..11i7- • '' f - - co . .f,„11i,.* •,• i* `.... 1 -, .t.i,. , ., -• ,, ' ,.,?4.-1..:'' t.4, :- ,,. A.:, 1* - V-''',-.4.•..7.".11.•:.';'.' 2 ....41''''' ./,*"..4-:. -• ,..- 1 t.'. '.'• . ,', ....,..:•., 11 ii,...,... , \‘et, ti.4' .''''..".X;• ' ..4 T *.W P• , 4.(41!.0 I, , ‘, %Is• , ikle4.'• I U. II . • : '• . ii . 4, ' ,,,• -.1 :si ,f: :-.,'',.:4'„i a I— ct . ''.. ..,.. . - - . ,..,,,,, .0.. . , y. , . „iv:. s., -,, %-rv,...,„'t Wi ..,7.t‘.• 4,-k. 4 0,"A . D Z c- ;,` • '• , - -..-',Ai. . tt C.r) 3 ' '4)'70'; ., ',/r:.14%.' ' -.1., 7 ,',.: ,At '",, ,*,,.., -i? LU LI- 4 ••,,A.,:!, ..::. .. .. , . .;....?•.-t.-..c.t 0 .4 .1 It-i-r.: .P., -.. . . ,, ,.• i t ,, .., , -t.,„/ .4..., E ,,,, .;.o.f..‘ ,6!...,''.'. ,) ,•V 1 .- ." i'"' '...4•1 '• '-V Flt.qw-...s, U) W 13- •CX ' :.•." ...s.,-/* t. e. 4'-4" 4.-ig ... .. E 5 .)-11V '1" .4 ' rci • rt,%-5-' ' 04-1 . - - ,.... l•-• - V-4,, a _4,....,,,,, , - A1,7,,.g.? ' ''' •A "'O. ' * -4 A.A.'r.'•4*.c• • • •'1 •.. • * .4"A, *IA'-f?Mts..ri:74.s. -' `'9"' fc• 'AN (-9 )". -,,,,p • . 'tn. :.4,,,. ,o.••• _4, .0, .-„•,,,,-- ; • - . .. 'A •*,.. ,r," ; • , '11 1.... 1 .,*MI* ;tift7-' *.•4; 7),.."44 i 'tt- • ;or"il.' A '. At,,,, 74 V" k Z (/) c7 • 4 ...44 li •4 . Y Iiiitv- • - " 1 . --L. ...x.t.,....- :.1.. .1 _•4 0'e 4,, .,;,A - ,... •1 • LU U) 0 Z 1.1.1 LLI ;:svi...,•.. Cl -1 0) ',-.*,'4', .14,. i ..... • i it,,,,,V, . ••••,. ,,, LL, Lu Z i •,-, -i..... ... 0 E -,„,:i....fk.,eqi,r,.„•4,14 .4 tk.-.1 ..V I'1 AI,,,3. '711,0•41 it p. . . •lirlt. k. g.$‘1'41*,-',' es'inli , .','y.c t4)tt ;^ ', '4:e• : e .!etr„,....-;..: .A.,4* - 1 L) 1 • t:-- $.0.. fi 44, .... t i''e"Ntt% V. 4Yi (Z±9 (1): DWZ °L3LU (1)›.41 NrICIN.',' csia)r: .tri ,••': ' -4"C,,."741- ..-. •• ;- :' 0, .7i-wrg:f. - 14,'. ' ..0 yi 04 -. • :A a.''''-.11=I:‘,'• ..., N '' N .. , , i,,.... "..,„:f.i.„,•-....4;:,:--. ,,-.,;•:1,,,.....,...x: ,•-tAt - -44,04:4 ...,,.. - -• 1 4. ,fftit 1.1.1,10;Ar44,10.. -, ,, .. .. _LI til cx i .. LU .• 2" . • , „,.,.,,:i.:41, ilb ',1, 'foii,' ,-" .tt ' .'1, -!•,, ' t r 72• < 0 CC 1.-. Z 3 • ." ••••• '‘.k:`,: 1;' •it* ...).'-' A•A•••,4 At.,• ."-.1.*•. . ' ,, 'W.:..•, .,7.,, • 1,,c.,-;L• '••7.4.I'",:,,L;4, 'T.:•• ' :•.. ,'',. . , 1,1*1 S„,,R c, 4 ..), ; ,,..tir` .., • t2 t 144, ti,:'',". AO. i i • filidit( - ..... am. 1- 0 0 Z Z Z ,.......:-„ts.t. ' 4,, -op) , ,4 - ...,,,,..,, d2.61P • • ..c , , !.:„.A., 41; f, :, 1,,...,.,. g •. .1. A * - Isi:**•?1 t '' 1 4' ' '.141';‘11:7 4ii , It-WI/ ''''' a. itt — I - '' ..t • .11$?..',:ii I ".,,,itt'1: „,,, , ,,,•,,, •-,y,;... 1%... .,pl -;.. -11.7,,.. . • , , . , lit .-.......0.,,,.t.t.1... ,,„ A r,, C.) cr CI CC 1." 1%;. •.. i... ,.,.. . ..,.,, -,,i , tit-t"...,- 7•„„, A tiei r--4. - .;,i, ku z :0, • ., 'pe, 14 f t _4' ,.$,*k4:, :i ,,,, 4, , eii ,..1,1 ....44 l''' < , •••4•':;t4' '4,132.- ' '.41 ,ti,A111. S.0,4s.r..., ?,,_ ,,,,,,,,#., ,, .44., ...1.2..2 .• ,I 'Ai' i,i3 • 044'; '., '''''.411tit• Vij4 ' '' ;'*'.'i;2 ,kli '.3.; ri i - i' 4 0 I, '4. 1?).; 't4.1', -.,. ':*•,^- .'-1A ,- - - 7?! C/!. ' • r-*- • • ‘, : I,- - . - . h i i,4, • ' • A ,e, . ... . 1„..,..4 , , ..z,,.... 4.,f .44: .01..A__...-;,ft: , ,. • - • ..v..,,tv :# „.-•...t.4,- „. ... i.3 . t 1 0 'ft t • ' (4, V iii„-.*2 143" `,. :-. ••2 C., , le.4•,,' 144310 , . •, ,.... ,1.' r ••3 ,„ it,. ' k '..... .... kt 1;441, • • *?••., • .. ' , ,• oc.,.'1, rv-- .. V•i;1.-A .2.z:-. - ,.•'# -'- •:ir-.7.1' 41.-il-t- '.!• - - -,..44 . t 114 ..'"J" . ' ... i4-.1.... t. •-. 4-,t„,-,i rg ,it..< .,, ; ... ,,,,...,.i.4..,,,,,,,..., .,r,-.,,,..,,,,',2,,-: .., .;.,:„-:,a, -.-., ts.4.t. ,. -;*,..1%-''-'1;!,,,,,-..,,,„. '41. ,..-....(4471,';:r.°1:::;1 I.11-1.:1:41:.t'14444:::". -:;;.•- `-'1*--;-•,1- .. tiog -4,2.t ..., ,, „•...4,.k "riff : ., t ,,,--,.‘ • „,.z.. ,..-,,,- A.ytt;- ,i.... ,z s -, fill " •-,• -et , .1 -,'..," ,.),t 1041', --;,:, 0.*Titi..`i..7.16' - t'!-,.4.,,,it , - „ **t:**14)011°:4 4i il...*..47. *,*•44{. Fj,1*'' '-*"??4"..'. '''it'A't.-.) • ci,. -- .r"orTir. ...trirXrli10.4.--rXg-.•..t44 : fi*L7 ,r. 4-.. t -.1..;;,*.;£,I.7. .t.7%4, ..,,...„,‘ il •,v As. ,,,,, ,,,,,,1 f...... t,,,,,,, 1. .,494,11,.., 11 -4. ,,,.:„.... -- itt:A!' ,,,,. , , „....t$ 1., „„4 le6/4444 . • , te:14,,.._:."..'.,,,in e , .".? A ''.*i '.:- ' " ' f .41te,;444 ''..• s';.:',.,:i. 14..--t .-,,,,,,,.#.„,„ . •f sT. . .,.. -'1,..„. ) ;4 . •,...-vt--; , , -- ••...; .- • ; 4.t:t.- -r.m.r1 v... -1.... . •- : •'„r..-_ r „. IP.r. . , t. t.r , .. 4:,...ist 2,1:2.1, .,,.., i It tk — ' , i.,ic,,,,,,,,,,...,s.,,,;,,,,,,,.4,, ,,,,,T - ‘, - ,e.,,z-,-.,.-,--:,- -.....tik-,, '-. A... . ,,.',-1,-•,•••=s4,.-ti -1'.;'.‘,411- - •i .,t .0.*1'1,',vil y . : -- •''- '''''',..,„%-:--. -'7'.0,.01 ' - :'-, .4.-im#-, -,--0-01'. .. ii 71 zikatf.r......,-1.." ,*. •--2 ' il,. . .. . . . , . , , . *" -- .'' 414'' 1 . - --I ' -' • - .. - tett.5,114-'Ktojet0311111111ffiMiniArr"---...„4taXgrfrtgAileillirri?4,-;,,;-,.1..v%1S.'Welvi.1;.7.-0."-*AkTkilrMAN,'•--•Wa:,.1,17A-1- 701,-•1, •,!•i.4,4".. --.'4'•''i'‘,.I.NrAnwre.431.T.4;i...-,?iff<simst.fflfilims,,A11. . . . s.- . ,„..,. ...i.,• ....r.,-,,41:,- .- • •e-,,-i ,. .„ ,,,„4r-. ..,-...,,, - , 51. - .. ,- . w,,,..NIA,... , :-....-,, -. -A' .4.,,,".• `2 t'.'.t • ..,,- #• 7„-- ' - .2 ,,, . .r., -,,,,,,,„., .„..4,:-.. ,,. irt-, ,fi :,.... •i,.....,.L.....,...1,"..itoilia ••. .3v 4,,;, ' 1:t.fily,i_:t'-?t.,'A•11e73614fit -..;..t$4 if .14kst 714 t.•,••'' ,A A ikt:i... 2 ;•,.."Af'- '-' t-'''' 11-' 4,-,r.--.1. ,4. .,,-...,-__ , k. 4,)i,• l'i '- 7,t,: . . ( 14*, . 1.?*r . •i' ' :. Z*;Arlk ....*r '1,`-'••• •' ' • l'' ., *, .." 411,# , ,t,... ., ..• :0, .4,, f , s' . :.:;** .1 4.** 't ".• ..s.at',4 *I 'IV :.eir) 1,..i., :,.. -.,, ...L.. ,..- .,2-4, . •-: , .,1 .. 1 ,7 ,,: ,t".;•,, 'It, ,,ji/rt,' 1 .4 ' '44,•/0.4 ;iiiltkg•*'••• • . A.F.A.eq 1.••.4 ' ',"" . rt- .--. i •• s-ft.;:a-oi..'u.'*.'• .,/7 '‘ '- • r -Ai!:••' --$:: .:. , -_. A,'•* "c' ; C ..;•.' . .' i 4 ,• , ,,711i,...- , "114 f- ..,.:. . - - •.1...;:..441. ..• .4. -4 - ,,-,!!!,.,'..:_-,..,,r.,A e-,..•/!..1,0,,,,,,f!i-4',.'T„.,I -A',,i-.•,.'--,...,- ..„..7 .!.= '-• .-. `-' '-. t. c, -.,:..f• •`.440%........-: - ;• •',los ' /..r.'':' ' ' frit-4, • . . ._.0,• t# , , 4- 4''''''q t I 140.4714,,-..„,..4.11, 11 4 4f.....,0,-.:.-:-:.. • t "..0*,;,,,... .1( •' j A r . ' 1,01"'e "1,t.'•' li'l.' 'r:- ..* 4414. •". .....1"6 t, ,-..., . oti, _,,, .. , . ., s.,,, 44-, -t,•r. Li.t,...1.:*;1,1-3,-,..,....., ',-- a, , 3.,..,. .,. k e. v,gis,s., Lk- '"' il, .1:,.., 1 ..i. f4.).. --,.. .-7.2:-..4. et. .4 .,.... l'1,4*,./k:. i,* .,,, ivf_ s•eNizza.,,, _ 1,-:,,.1,ty.i, 4:,, .1' vi. , " •,*4.4'04' , ; , 44.) ..2,•6.4.., - „.4 .., 7 TtPIL• .,it. t e4P fil.t'X't .1'; 15'r . 41 ' ",. ,.OW:'''1,, f-, • ' " .....1.%7:4,1,,, ., • . % ?164:7- cf'',. 11 .0 • .;it' 1, .b.. , ', ,tf •• ' - 40 4 4 - . ,i,,,.`arl.„ • V' ' 4 •'. . . '. ''' * t k ... . . 4 •0-' , -,01,/`•‘- ,1- .",.,,r-drri,•••,•'•,171:,•10., . - *ko ' ".e.,r• ' , - . A,,,,,I AA „Al;,,,,,i_ ' -g....• .„,.., - ",,,,f •.4:i',";Z....7..#'I' ' ‘ tt;' ,"'''•..it .'5,-.;'' '',41 , ..rP . e w ,A.- • .' % ,'T''''.,.:','•';;111', ,-.,',. "4. .': *4 It-'i 4:4$I 0 V:1,t41;41.# '4:11$"' ... $ ' , , .. ,r177,1#4,, , , ,,-...A.t.,..- ttietzis, rAt ,,..,,,t, „ie-1,,, • '.- • •--t ;%, :„.t,•.....x...:tr.- .4.,All,,,;$6..r,7*v.0,-„,. Alyy ,- ,.,, ,, ,,- ,. ,.1 .•*, ,.•..1 ,t ,..t....., • „ -- . -- . .f,,0. „, ,,,,,-,..,. --,••r •,• •-•.'• b-,s- . „f.! ,-.4,:e' 42 - -•'-', '3i-4 ','!tle4 4 vf,' ., . . ... GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED SAFEWAY RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH SECOND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-7323 July 2, 1996 PREPARED FOR SAFEWAY STORES, INC. Raymond A. las Staff Engineer . s. t4. 4747 gre 7°•1 sx 2: Robert S. Levinso '�•,, Principal �'+.: 3-9f0 I tomes 03/07/`l r-1 Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 643-3780 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions, their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be. their frequency and extent proposed construction activity, and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years.due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by The following suggestions and observations are offered mate- to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth, rock and time. The actual interface between cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report occur during a construction project. indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage. to iden- tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed, and to recommend solutions to problems A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- faceencountered on site. exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors.These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration: the location of the structure on the site and its orientation, physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground- be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions •When the nature of the proposed structure is and, thus. the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example, if an office building will be report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage,or if a refriger- apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary frigerated one: •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered: PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified: •when there is a change of ownership,or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor,or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise. this report was prepared expressly for the dient involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the dient. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the client ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose. may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken, when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. i� ) , Earth Consultants Inc. .40 �,,i Gv,I,,hni,-„i EnQint•t•rs.(Nrytkt.,ivtti&Cm it nm nt,l 4,l a nntits July 2, 1996 E-7323 Safeway Stores, Inc. 1000 - 124th Avenue Northeast, Suite 201 Bel evue, Washington 98015 Attention: Mr. Mitch Johnson Deer Mr. Johnson: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Sal eway, Rainier Avenue South and South Second Street, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our May 24, 1996 proposal. In our opinion, the development of the site as planned is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Subsurface conditions encountered during our exploration indicates the presence of varying depths of loose to medium dense silty sand and sandy silt fill. The fill depths encountered generally ranged between approximately three to ten feet. Subsurface conditions likely to impact the project construction are primarily related to the relatively loose nature of the existing fill. In our opinion, the proposed development can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on at least two feet of structural fill, provided the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the final design. WE appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Re3pectfully submitted, EARTH O ULTANTS, INC. rt S. Levinson, P.E. Principal RAC/RSL/kml 1805-136th Place N.E.,Suite 201, Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)74-608-60 Tacoma(206)272-6608 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-7323 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 Surface 2 Subsurface 2 Fill 2 Native 2 Groundwater 3 Laboratory Testing 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Foundations 5 Dock-High Retaining Walls 6 Slab-on-Grade Floors 6 Seismic Design Considerations 6 Excavations and Slopes 7 Site Drainage 8 Utility Support and Backfill 8 Pavement Areas 8 LIMITATIONS 9 Additional Services 10 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring Location Plan Plate 3 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Plate 4 Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A13 Boring Logs Plates B1 and B2 Grain Size Analyses Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED SAFEWAY RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH SECOND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-7323 INTRODUCTION General Th s report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed Safeway, Rainier Avenue South and South Second Street, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Pizte 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, and ba;;ed on the conditions encountered,develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. At the time our study was performed, the building location, and our ex:)loratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. Project Description We understand it is planned to develop a new Safeway Store roughly in the same location as tho existing store, and expand the site development with a drug store and additional retail sp ice. The proposed developments will be situated along the east half of the property. The remainder of the site will consist of asphalt pavement areas and landscaping. We understand the gross area of the proposed Safeway will be approximately 55,400 square feet. The combined gross area of the proposed drug store and retail space will be approximately 23,000 square feet. We understand no significant raising or lowering of site grades will be necessary in the building areas. In the vicinity of the proposed pavement areas, some filling and leveling may be required. At the time this report was written, specific structural design information was not available. However, based on our experience with similar projects, we would anticipate the following stl uctural loads: • Wall Loads - 3 to 4 kips per lineal foot • Column Loads - 75 to 125 kips • Slab Loads - 250 pounds per square foot If any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED SAFEWAY RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH SECOND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-7323 INTRODUCTION Geieral Th s report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Coisultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed Safeway, Rainier Avenue South and South Second Street, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, and ba 7ed on the conditions encountered,develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed sit ; development. At the time our study was performed, the building location, and our ex:)loratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. Project Description Wu understand it is planned to develop a new Safeway Store roughly in the same location as thy: existing store, and expand the site development with a drug store and additional retail sp:3ce. The proposed developments will be situated along the east half of the property. The remainder of the site will consist of asphalt pavement areas and landscaping. We understand the gross area of the proposed Safeway will be approximately 55,400 square feet. The combined gross area of the proposed drug store and retail space will be approximately 23,000 square feet. We understand no significant raising or lowering of site grades will be necessary in the building areas. In the vicinity of the proposed pavement areas, some filling and leveling may be required. At the time this report was written, specific structural design information was not available. However, based on our experience with similar projects, we would anticipate the following structural loads: • Wall Loads - 3 to 4 kips per lineal foot • Column Loads - 75 to 125 kips • Slab Loads - 250 pounds per square foot If any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Safeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 'Ju y 2, 1996 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is located to the east of Rainier Avenue South, between South Second Street and South Third Street (see Plate 1 , Vicinity Map). The east portions of the site are currently occupied by an existing Safeway and parking area, and a small one story building. Along the south and west sides of the existing Safeway, the site is undeveloped. There are several fast food and commercial developments to the west of the development site along Rainier Avenue South and South Third Street. The undeveloped areas to the south and west of the existing Safeway are generally flat. There are some lower depressed areas west of the existing Safeway, in the proposed pavement areas. It appears these areas received little or no fill during placement of the su rounding fills. The vegetation in the undeveloped areas generally consists of deciduous trees, small shrubs, and grasses. Subsurface The proposed building sites and pavement areas were explored by drilling seven borings at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Boring Logs, Plates A2 through Al 3 for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at the locations explored. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a geieralized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Fil Va rying depths of silty sand and sandy silt fill were encountered immediately below the surface at our boring locations. Fill depths encountered at our boring locations ranged between approximately three to ten feet. The fill encountered was generally classified as loose to medium dense silty sand and sandy silt (Unified Classifications SM and ML). At the time of our exploration, these soil units were generally wet and above their optimum moisture content. During dry weather, portions of the silty sand fill may be suitable for support of fo indations, slab-on-grade floors and pavements, provided the fill can be prepared in accordance with the recommendations discussed in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" section of this report. NE+tive Ur derlying the fill, varying deposits of silty sand, poorly graded sand, and poorly graded gr:3vel, were generally encountered to the depths explored. Some very loose to loose deposits of sandy silt were also encountered at boring locations B-2 and B-5. The poorly graded sand and poorly graded gravel (Unified Classifications SP and GP) were generally loose to dense. Earth Conauhanta, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Safeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 'July 2, 1996 Page 3 Groundwater Tf e groundwater water table was encountered at a depth of approximately ten (10) to twelve (1 2) feet below the existing surface at the time of our exploration. The groundwater level, hcwever, is not static; therefore, one may expect fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter months (typically October through M3y). Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify tha field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering cf aracteristics of the soil encountered. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. Tf e results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided in Appendix B, or at the appropriate sample depth on the boring logs. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical re :ommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding oL. r engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for th s project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report ur less we are otherwise directed in writing. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the proposed development can be constructed generally as planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. The critical geotechnical aspects of the planned de velopment are primarily associated with foundation support and reducing post construction settlements. The proposed structures may be supported by conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on at least two feet of structural fill (structural fill requirements are defined in the "Site Preparation and Genera/Earthwork" section of this report). Slab-on- grade foundations may be supported on at least one foot of structural fill. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Safeway Stores, Inc. and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Earth Consuhants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SEfeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 ,it ly 2, 1996 Page 4 Site Preparation and General Earthwork The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all structures, pavement sections, organic matter, and any other deleterious material. In areas where site grades are ra sed at least one foot, the existing pavement may be broken into maximum six (6) inch size pil;ces and left in place. Site fills may then be placed directly over the broken asphalt. St-ipped materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. E� fisting utility pipes to be abandoned should be plugged or removed so that they do not provide a conduit for water and cause soil saturation and stability problems. To reduce the potential for differential settlement, existing concrete or ductile iron utility pipes should be removed or relocated in areas where the pipe will be less than two feet from the bottom of the building footings. Once stripping operations are complete, the ground surface where foundations, structural fill, or pavements are to be placed should be proofrolled. All proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Any areas that are found to be yielding or unstable should be repaired either by re-compacting the area, or overexcavating and replacing with structural fill. An ECI representative should observe any overexcavations to evaluate the competence of the overexcavated surface. The use of a woven geotextile placed on the overexcavated surface may be useful in bridging over unstable areas. During dry weather, any non-organic compactible soil can be used as structural fill. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum size of three inches and no more than five percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. The existing fill at the time of our exploration was generally wet and above its optimum moisture content. During dry weather conditions, some of the existing fill may be suitable for use as structural fill, provided it can be compacted to the requirements of structural fill. Due to the moisture sensitive nature of the existing fill and native soil, the soil may degrade if exposed to excessive moisture. Compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moisture increases significantly above its optimum condition. Structural fill is defined as any compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or any other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density. The maximum diy density should be determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. Earth Consuhants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Safeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 July 2, 1996 Page 5 Foundations Assuming compliance with the recommendations outlined in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" section of this report, it is our opinion the proposed building can be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation bearing on at least two feet of structural fill. The two feet of structural fill should extend a horizontal distance of at least one fc of from the edges of the footing. If greater depths of structural fill are required, the fill should extend a horizontal distance of at least one half the thickness of the structural fill from the edges of the footing. If the existing fills are found to be suitable, they may be used for structural fill. Exterior foundations elements should be placed a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. With foundation support obtained as described, for design, an allowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred (2,500) psf can be used. Continuous and individual spread fcotings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Loading of this magnitude would be provided with theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated with differential movement of about three quarters of one inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur during construction a: dead loads are applied. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in the above allowable bearing capacities can be used. The horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent existing fill soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.40 can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred (300) pcf. These lateral resistance values are al owable values, a factor-of-safety of 1 .5 has been included. As movement of the foundation el ment is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. A I footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that conditions are as anticipated in this report. Earth Consultants, Inc. GE OTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Safeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 July 2, 1996 Page 6 Dc ck-High Retaining Walls In the loading dock areas, the dock-high retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral ea-th pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five (35) pcf if they are allowed to rotate 0.002 times the height of the wall. If walls are prevented from rotating, we recommend that they be designed to resist lateral loads of fifty (50) pcf. These values are based on horizontal backfill and that surcharges due to hydrostatic pressures, traffic, structural loads or other surcharge loads will not act on the wall. If such surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressure. SIB°,b-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors may be supported on at least one foot of structural fill. Any disturbed subgrade soil must either be recompacted or replaced with structural fill. Slab-on-grade floors should be designed by the structural engineer based on the anticipated loading and the subgrade support characteristics. For slabs supported on at least one foot of structural fill, a rnodulus of vertical subgrade reaction of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic inch (pci) mz y be used for design. Th:3 slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In ,areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane me y be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Se smic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread and have been subcrustal events, rar ging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Such deep events have exhibited no surface faulting. Structures are subject to damage from earthquakes due to direct and indirect action. Direct action is represented by shaking. Indirect action is represented by foundation soil failures and is Typified by ground failure or liquefaction. Thri UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force prc cedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that a site coefficient of S2 = 1 .2 should be used for the static force procedure as outlined in Section 1628 of the 1994 UBC. For the dynamic force procedure outlined in sec tion 1929 of the 1994 UBC, the curve for deep cohesionless or stiff clay soils (Soil Type 2) should be used for Figure 16-3, Normalized Response Spectra Shapes. Earth Conauhanta, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Safeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 •Ju,y 2, 1996 Page 7 Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a :specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement foi structures founded in the liquefying soils. It is our opinion the potential for widespread liquefaction over the site during a seismic event is low. Isolated areas may be subject to liquefaction, however, the effect on the planned building is anticipated to be minimal provided the recommendations contained in this report are followed. We estimate liquefaction induced settlement would be in the range of the post construction settlements discussed earlier. Excavations and Slopes The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming re:;ponsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Fe:ieral safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, the site soils expected to be encountered would be classified as Type C by OSHA, and as such, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 .5H:1V. If slopes of these inclinations, or flatter, cannot be co istructed,temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. All permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. All cut slopes sh:)uld be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, inc luding flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, wz ter should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. All permanently-exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Safeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 'July 2, 1996 Page 8 Site Drainage The site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of three percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved arE as, which can be sloped at a gradient of one percent. Perimeter footing drains should be installed to help reduce the potential for water infiltration during periods of high groundwater seepage. The footing drain should be installed at or just be'ow the invert of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is provided on Plate 3. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Utility Support and Backfill Based on the soil conditions encountered at the time of our exploration, the existing fill and na ive soil should provide adequate support for utilities. If remedial measures are necessary to provide adequate utility support, the unsuitable soil can be overexcavated and replaced with a suitable ballast and pipe bedding material such as pea gravel. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve (12) inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12) inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 4. Pavement Areas Thi) adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and pre pared as described in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" section of this report. Existing fill surfaces and native cut surfaces should be in a firm and unyielding condition when prcofrolled. Fill placed to achieve subgrade elevations should meet the requirements of structural fill. In localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Safeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 'July 2, 1996 Page 9 TI-e following pavement section for lightly-loaded areas can be used: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, the following sections can be considered for truck- trafficked areas: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB. Tl ese pavement thicknesses may be modified based on anticipated traffic loads and frE quency. A5 phalt concrete (AC), asphalt treated base (ATB), and crushed rock base (CRB) materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. All rock base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557-78 laboratory test standard. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided to us by the you, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in th s area. No warranty is expressed or implied. TF-e recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings. Soil and groundwater conditions between borings may vary from those encountered. TI•e nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become ev;dent until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Safeway Stores, Inc. E-7323 July 2, 1996 Page 10 Additional Services As the engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. o awes ' •, . - _ �/ ■ y • UM :' 124 h x,•v. Ei < 1 .,.s N =� 61H ST I �. :! v1 t - ‘,‘' sr, is . - -. N.._-.....- z mil . - 1 -..,5 .0 ri - , i; 7 $--.4saws _ •• a i.nt /g' at 0 -14 = I-1 s2 72 5 TN r i. % It , 111,g ;• '41 -3 ,- rmr -I 12BTH 1� 5T 1i v r; { � a� _ -900 Ox 6 ,, --,a , .. In '. # 4 -., _--fieggailgifttl. . . .8 S!Ill" 3IILU V illIV .- ,,,,,g1 -ra........ - iiitairv- '•iLLIIIrliIMNPI li77-ir-7,,._., . g ART �J�'ji� � � 3� S 132NDIV El --ipri r _ 414' NE ivicron `t•, N1 I 14. S STi ,� i TD81N Et/ _i. •,.. NzsimSI • 18 ; Ai *1 1-1, : 2NDKr CD[7E1tY. new . giErnlbINC"Tc. i 900 `. -..... ,.Y,`: «."r - 9`..(� A. •� � ,�® �gil �-AM;i--..s........._; '= : is _ ' 1 .this,..900. i./i %.,....._ ...... '-'1/4'. . L 0 9(x-wiffirpov, ilw‘--..--s msfierragril§ -c,..2-:-.% _ RD .... .,,,- s4,- -grip ,,,„,iii,-,,,, .,Ilimicoil ii i.,4 Ifn. A1474, 84r 1Th CT 44. . MYER _,,g4T4 'fit g au, i. L �r.. �,,�, �6� iimietit, s ,f : "'tom41 ..,-,:r4r, ,. 11/4.7..1, r i s ue.;. . :;s..:,�=::: t • `�i RICEEAIN ,c ?l 515 * h�� a pt W 1 i N d�� 7 'Jf rN1 r ; . reN Q v : . ` E RI S VIL6EPL 0201 111 � �� f im 4. s� 16TH 1 ST 6., , "ty res .. ..C G •„. F . x •m _ goo I . 1., = S 161M ST n. . krib.. • x�� ,_ r 0,sE,ii. „ SEA. 16� ....,,..„........- ..,,-,.......... „„Triiift, , , VAIL' ,i- ':--- "4' ""w —' d''''‘.'' .. IC 1 ^SW 19TH ST 714S ��®� § -b, - r = cT�v~ IIIII mn, ' r M', • s. , 'J11 i _ _ t F v 0 Reference: King County/Map 658 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 1997 do,, oiv, iiii i Vicinity Map •ii Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store �!>' 1r> ,i ""'ical Enginerm.�.* 6 1.n""'v Y"tal ,r„'", Renton, Washington Proj. No. 7323 I Drwn. GLS I Date June '96 Checked RAC I Date 6/21/96 I Plate 1 1 .. S. 2nd STREET W i i B-2 f- ' I-----I f wI L U U El > Q BSAFEWAY z _ V- E_. [1 0 — ---------:\----; n 1) 6 >— B-4 I _1 DRUGS__ r ��Th r�_--J B 5IT I 4 E SHO I S. 3rd STREET LEGEND 0 B-1 -:- Approximate Location of ECI Boring, Proj. No. E-7323, June 1996 Approximate Scale 0 Proposed Building 0 75 150 300ft. --J I Existing Building Po' - 1: iiii‘ Boring Location Plan ` �� Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store 1'I, IF � ma `te.. ` 's * `us&E'" '""," ""'""" , Renton, Washington Proj. No. 7323 I Drwn. GLS I Date June '96 Checked RAC I Date 6/21/96 I Plate 2 • 1....___.• 4 ..-- T Siope To Drain .;P • T W .Q 6 inch min. O p o., 18 inch min. • _ 't. " ..;' •-1,- •e• 4 inch min. _•• ` p ° °- Diameter 1'•' : • , !•:'-.--*--.: ..; , • °•e .O : p p0 O Perforated Pipe------ :..•.'°• 'o:••••.• .° °o°° o a -o° _ Wrapped in Drainage •• • ° p =•e ° Fabric •�! °�•° •°• ° ' p � { 1 1 } 2 inch min. 2 inch min. / 4 inch max. 12 inch —t- min. SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LEGEND .•' Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. - - • - Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the • a_;°• WSDOT Specifications. ODrain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down;tight jointed;with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. 1. 411`. A' TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL •- • Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store I', VI! C.r orrdnla Ens moors.Goologsls&Environmental ScfrTrlsu Renton, Washington Proj No. 7323 I Drwn. GLS I Date June '96 Checked RAC I Date 6/21/96 I Plate 3 , T • Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas r - . a 0 ° o ' o Varies 95 0 � • 95 1 Foot Minimum A Backfill 80 90 Varies .111Z:2:/;- •:` A `'p'O�U��vO �o o .0 eO A O • o 7• .o�'1pQ il�•V1 Bedding Q^: °.0;0- ° �'0 '.� Q. 0.. Varies pO�o':. o• o •• •. QQo•/ pO•O..00Ooo. °° .00 0•• y��QoeQ ° p'0 O•°•O�'.00o4`.'ZJ•o:: 'ems 0 • �n'O�'oo�o O°Qo(i�iioo0e. :b'_oQ?o•oQo;O ♦ LEGEND: 9 3Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab 0•0 OO••i • o • ° •. Base Material or Base Rock° •• n Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General - Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and °ab o° p' Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers ••a'r'-•- Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL ti Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store Gmrn finr:H Enaln.'rs Grobogr,ts 6 FrvnonnYrnal Sornirus Renton, Washington Proj. No. 7323 I Drwn. GLS I Date June '96 Checked RAC I Date 6/21/96 Plate 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-7323 Our field exploration was performed on June 12, 1996. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling seven borings to a maximum depth of twenty five feet below the existing grade. The borings were drilled by Associated Drilling, subcontracted to ECI, using a ruck-mounted drill rig. The approximate boring locations were determined by pacing from existing landmarks. The boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. The approximate locations of our borings are shown on the Boring Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained logs of the borings, obtained representative samples, measured grcundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System wh ch is presented on Plate Al , Legend. The Boring Logs are presented on Plates A2 through A13. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Consuhanta, Inc. MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH SY TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMMTERBOL GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand Gravel C •0 •Q • gW Mixtures, Little Or No Fines And Clean Gravels n n n Gravelly (little or no fines) M ♦ 4 GP Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils • • • Grained gp Sand Mixtures,Little Or No Fines Soils More Than GM ( Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- 50% Coarse Gravels With gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable Retained On amount of fines) GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand- No.4 Sieve gc Clay Mixtures • Sand , • ,e o* ,e SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly And Clean Sand o o * o 0 SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) d::::+:7:47 :;*.741. ?�:ii:1' 1 SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than Soils Q ::,,Z*:'*. 50% Material 4:. fl:> S Sands, Little Or No Fines Larger Than More Than SM No.200 Sieve TSilty Sands Sand- Silt Mixtures Size 50% Coarse Sands With Sm Fraction Fines(appreciable ,::: PassiSieve ng No 4 amount of fines) :' SC SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock Flour,Silty- ml Clayey Fine Sands:Clayey Silts w/Slight Plasticity Fine Silts Liquid Limit Y CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, / Grained And Less Than 50 //' CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Soils Clays I I I I OL Organic Silts And Organic I I I I I I OI Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity MH Inorganic Silts,Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fire More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Silts Smaller Than And Liquid Limit CH Inorganic Clays Of High No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays Size ‘,,,,,/// OH Organic Clays Of Medium To High 1 Oh Plasticity, Organic Silts 1 PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils r,, `tr `r� ``r pt With High Organic Contents Topsoil '4,4,4, '' Humus And Duff Layer ♦♦♦♦♦♦ Fill ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Hlyhly Variable Constituents ♦♦♦♦♦♦ The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indica%borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2'O.D.SPUR SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE,%dry weight 11 24'I.D.RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER P SAMPLER PUSHED * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED i WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft LL. UOUID UMIT,% 2 DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION Y SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE P 44" LEGEND Earth Consultants Inc. 1.III; yi`11 li riot*:liil.illlJ/.Ira vs.(i1xikgbs*Iir i,nx„I%I IL IISUI3 116b Proj. No. 7323 I Date June'96 I Plate Al Bor(ng Log Project Name: Sheet of Proposed Safeway Store 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: _ 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-1 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: _ Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite W No. r o .c • H e Surface Conditions: .13 Blows a E a - E N E (%) Ft L 7 0 LL • 7 ] ° N VI ♦��♦ ML (Approximate 2"Aspahlt&4-6' Gravel Base) ♦♦♦♦♦ ALL Brown sandy SILT, loose, moist to wet •• ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦j♦♦♦ 2 • • 22.2 6 ♦♦♦♦♦ 3 • •,• � 4 • ♦♦j♦ 5 ♦ o• 22.3 7 %%% -becomes increasingly silty ••♦•♦ s ♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦ �•�•�• 7 �♦ SP-SM Gray poorly graded fine to medium SAND with silt and gravel, • 5.9 10 , 8 medium dense, moist 9 P D 1 ° 10 Q -increasing gravel content, groundwater encountered at 10' 8.4 14 -small sample recovery o 11 P v r ° 12 a SP Grades to poorly graded medium to coarse SAND with gravel, • medium dense, water bearing 9.4 11 ° l.40 13 a d 0 C ° 14 •'Qo • a *; 15 -becomes loose • 11.7 6 i,a4,r • o •` 16 r ,° • a 17 C o i • ,o • 18 .- (a a.* o• • p ° 19 In a• d N a e '° • - 1 Boring Log tri e` Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store • UIt If j1j Gearctrik:al Engkleuz.Coda's).*&Envizonmerralscia ` Renton,Washington ccProj.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June '96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate A2 Subsurfaa•conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis ar d judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretati.m by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Proposed Safeway Store 2 2 ~Job No. Logged by. Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-1 ~)rifling Contactor. Drilling Method: Sampling Method: _ Associated Drilling HSA SPT I hound Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite ~ o — No. o t — N 0 W Blows a E a +' E N E (%) Ft. ' > e V. N/ ? 0 VI N 1 1 GP Grades to poorly graded sandy GRAVEL, dense, water bearing s.1 40 ► .► •. •. 21 •••� Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 10.0 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings, bentonite and asphalt patch. co \ N N ,ur, ►: 44 Boring Log ! e Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store 0,144 o=wamiceialcomemomwoweamwurnmeftwscieftim Renton,Washington coProj.Nc. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis aid judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interprets,on by others of information presented on this log. • Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Proposed Safeway Store 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12196 B-2 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: _ Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite ~ U No — o .c ! o Surface Conditions: W �oWs a E a ♦ E N E (%) Ft ■ > ■ V ■ ] 0 N N N �•�• SM (Duff to approximately 4-6") ♦♦♦♦ FILL-Brown silty fine to medium SAND, loose, moist ♦♦♦• ♦•♦� ♦♦♦ • 12.8 20 +. 3 — -becomes medium dense, some 2'to 3' gravel ♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ 4 — ♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ 5 ♦♦♦♦♦ 14.9 8 ♦•♦�♦• -becomes loose, some glass fragments ♦•♦�♦ 6 — •♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ 7 ♦ 8 ML Gray sandy SILT,very loose,wet, some mottling 47.1 2 9 10 -increased fine sand content 45.7 3 11 7 12 _ -groundwater table encountered at approximately 12' • SP Gray poorly graded fine to medium SAND with gravel, dense,water `< ` 13 bearing, sampler obstructed by rock p ° : ..Q.9°d 14 - o •1a o a 15 -increased gravel and coarse sand content 12.3 6 1▪ 7, • •0 • 16 C▪ I • e ° 17 po • ` v C° 18 ♦ ' .._O o a d N o_ w; Boring Log Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store N r ('.t010(Yi11Ce1 EY1�fOaf.GOOb�fb i PIW40t�7CYW ScfrnWts Renton,Washington Proj.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Shoot of Proposed Safeway Store 2 2 Job No. Logged by. Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-2 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite — • No. O L — en W Blows a E a t E E (96) Ft ! a Ill IL M CO N N N ML Gray sandy SILT, loose,wet 41.6 4 21 22 23 - -drilling indicates gravel encountered at 23' • 24 SP Graypoorlygraded fine to coarse SAND withgravel,verydense, a:::s ►: water bearing 25 11.8 50/6- �'a +e Boring terminated at 26.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 12.0 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings and bentonite. t N N ,v,_ At 44k•. Boring Log the i Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store ccolear e«s.co 6,010$ Enviscrimertal scxnw Renton,Washington Proj.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Proposed Safeway Store 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-3 Drilling Contactor. Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite U _ No. — o -c • ! H o Surface Conditions: W Blows a E °• } E N E (%) Ft r a o 4. r > > • N rA U) ♦ ♦•♦ SM (Approximately 2'Asphalt over 4-6"Gravel Base) �♦�♦�♦ FILL:Brown to black silty fine to medium SAND, loose, moist ij3 ; • 13.8 13 •♦•- 3 -becomes medium dense, moist to wet ♦♦♦♦♦♦ •♦. 4 • ♦♦♦ . 5 iSP-SM Gray pony graded fine to medium SAND with gravel, dense, moist 5.3 32 6 '''"•" -becomes very dense 8 3.9 75 o'i: ! ;1 GP p GP Grades to poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, dense,water bearing 1 10 = -groundwater table encountered at approximately 10' 6.7 45 •'•' 11 s M •• •••• 12 • SP Grades to poorly graded fine to coarse SAND with gravel, dense, water bearing13 15.9 48 is °o a 14 M<v ae: !Ioo■ Rp ♦° ® 6 15 , 7.9 39 .4 16 17 19 ; 4:4 In o +a N M'b; 44k, Boring Log Gme' Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store Renton,Washington co No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Prate A6 Subst rface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analy is and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interp station by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of _ Proposed Safeway Store 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: _ 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-3 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite — e — No. o L — N o • Blows a E tl f E N E (%) Ft r > O LL 0 O N N N � b 18.4 31 C o -increasing sand content 21 Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 10.0 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings, bentonite and asphalt patch. (13 In N \— `° , �; -� Boring Log� -.att. Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store 'ical 'c ni COOiO°b"Envie:tuners.' Scientists Renton,Washington ifl F roj.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate A7 Sul)surface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, amlysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Into rpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Proposed Safeway Store 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-4 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No. U o .c ! N ; Surface Conditions: w Blows aE a4- L E (%) 0 > N E 0 LL 0 7 N tel Vl ♦�� SM (Gravel and Duff to approximately 2-4") jill : FILL:Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, loose, moist • • 10.8 11 � 3 -becomes medium dense, some 2"gravel • ♦i♦i♦i 4 i♦i♦i♦ ♦♦♦♦j♦ 5 8.1 8 ♦♦♦• -loose, small sample recovery • ♦♦♦• • 5.6 5 ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦• ♦♦♦ • 10 $P-SM Gray poorly graded fine to medium SAND with silt and gravel, 5.7 14 medium dense, moist 11 e 12 Q— -becomes dense,water bearing -groundwater table encountered at approximately 12' ?p: 13 9.2 37 :# 14 `► '< 15 -Increasing sand content 11.0 47 'o• r.::« 17 18 m 19 `° ��►.; ►: -i , Boring Log a Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store �1� ves.ccob `@iv4ormey''Scientists Renton,Washington Proj.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate A8 :subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, itnalysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log 'roject Name: Sheet of _ Proposed Safeway Store 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6j12/96 B-4 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite o — e — No. 0 L — VI0 W Blows a E a + E• N E ) O N N N 7.7 51 -becomes very dense,water bearing ° 21 - 0 Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 12.0 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings and bentonite. ui o, ui N 441. Boring Log 4 a Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store rCJ , dui 1'� ,ea,. .. s Renton,Washington -1 Proj.No. 7323 Own. GLS a, Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6 25 96 Plate A9 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log • Project Name: Sleet a( Proposed Safeway Store 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-5 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite No - o .c ! N o Surface Conditions: • Blows a E a t E N E 1%j Ft. M ) • li • M O N N SM (Gravel and Duff to approximately 2-4 FILL: Brown silty fine to medium SANDwith gravel, loose, moist 1 2 29.8 6 3 ML Gray sandy SILT, loose,wet, some mottling 4 /f 5 SM Grades to silty fine to medium SAND, loose,wet, trace gravel 25.0 4 6 SP Grades to poorly, a s" graded fine to medium SAND with gravel, loose, ,,e moist, small sample recovery 5.1 6 ,° ao ° 8 • o' 9 ° 4.0 ' GP Grades to poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, water • 10 bearing, groundwater table encountered at approximately 9.5' 11.0 13 •1�1 11 •••' 12 • • • 13 10.5 14 •A•I -Increasing coarse sand content • I . .• 14 • SP Grades to poorly graded medium to coarse SAND with gravel, p o 15 medium dense,water bearing •18 °'o'O a<.4 16 R•,o ° . 17 o •° c o d °3v •;• 18 to o 00• 19 \ ° o a ' • - •e 10 .4drz 4 Boring Log Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store Engineers.Geoiospsis 4 Envltaimsmai scientists Renton, Washington coProj.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate A10 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Proposed Safeway Store 2 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-5 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite U _ • W • No. O t — N o Blows a E a + N (%) Ft. t 31 o u- tr 7 a • N N N • a 12.0 22 is' Gam_ Boring terminated at 21.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 9.5 feet during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings and bentonite. to o.• N ��N p►, 444 Boring Log c, !� �A Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store N MO/ , �� 1 Coae hnKa1 ems.GeobOMs i@Mtvmrntal Scientists Renton,Washington m Proj.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate Al Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Boring Log • Project Name: Sheet of Proposed Safeway Store 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 6/12/96 B-6 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA _ SPT _ Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well E Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite u — o r !• ti o Surface Conditions: No.W • Blows a E a i EEL Vl (%) Ft. E 3 e to O y O N N ♦♦♦ SM (Sod to approximately 21 ♦ FILL: Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, loose, moist ♦♦�♦�♦ 1 — •♦•j♦ 2 • ♦♦♦ • ♦♦♦ 16.5 12 ♦j♦•♦ 3 -becomes medium dense • ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ 4 ♦♦♦ ♦• ♦♦♦•♦♦ 5 ♦♦♦♦ • 15.2 viz : 6 -becomes very loose,wet ♦ • ♦i♦i♦ ♦♦i♦♦♦ ii♦i♦ 9.8 3 ♦�♦�♦� 8 -becomes loose 'ii - 109 • 11 Boring terminated at 11.5 feet below existing grade. No groundm encountered during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings and bentonite. h N /"1 �,1; AI. Boring Log Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store ( �Nor Geaxl,nic"eiigine"'.G°ologise&erm°"ma""'soa"ioe` Renton,Washington Proj.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate Al Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use a Interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Raring Log Project Name: Sheet of Proposed Safeway Store 1 1 Job Nc Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 7323 RAC 6/12/96 _ 6/12/96 B-7 Drillinc,Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated Drilling HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite u _ — No. — o L N o Surface Conditions: W Blows a m a t a um (%) (� e 3 s Li- i i rA N 0 SM (Sod to approximately 2') FILL: Brown to black silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, loose, 1 moist 2 10.8 11 3 -becomes medium dense 4 5 ML Brown sandy SILT, medium dense, moist,trace gravel 15.7 11 6 7 a 8 ��SPSM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, moist , 5.3 13 , , 'a 9 10 -increased silt content G 6.8 51 , a 11 Boring terminated at 11.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during drilling. Boring backfilled with cuttings and bentonite. ui (° ,44 �; .,n, Boring Log 1 o' Earth Consultants Inc. Proposed Safeway Store Renton,Washington Prof.No. 7323 Dwn. GLS Date June'96 Checked RAC Date 6/25/96 Plate A1: Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. • APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-7323 Earth Coneultante, Inc. I I SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S.STANDARD - GRAIN SIZE IN MM o m a n N o o $ Q o Z N - � ,- 0 t1t 0 O v G u _Da M N ,- .-c), r (1�- -IW I- N M -. O 0 100-J w 1 N 90 10 w i � so 20 m ^ m 70 _ 30 77 c) ` ) n uu)i --1 Z -n 60 \\ ao -i \\\ ). y i (i) Z n o 50 \\\1 50 DJ N9 40 60 co = 30 70 cn.�. 0 n _ t� 20 80 --1 n m a so \\..., 10 o ro n I l I r I I I I 1 1 ri I I I I I I I I I I I 11 �7"®'-- 4-�}-{p a — �p- . ' 100 CD o o 0 0 0 m tD o M N O 0 tD o M N .- 00 (D a M N 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O �~ O D_ M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS . 0 0 0 0 0 0 rt N c Du Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE m - En V) COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES N rn h, m w Z Moisture KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL ko w ~c D Test Pit No. (ft.) rn rt cn -< O rt V) .�.r n o m N E O B-1 2.5 ML Brown sandy SILT 22.2 -- -- m to O--- B-2 2.5 SM Brown silty SAND 18.2 -- -- 0 - B-2 15 SP Gray poorly graded SAND with gravel 12.3 -- -- I SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS • I I SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES j NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S,STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM p 00 l0 O N p cl_V + °+ .. CO n m O O p 00 Op O n N F 0 0 O O 0 Q O ` 10074 ,�+ tD V M N 'q�'r- r-�3 Lei >" c� .1 W N c v ui u IX, - \ ' ' « (.0 N co '�� 90 10 .\ e O 80 20 a \ _ 73 m n m oo ^ m 70 - 30 0 -Zi - OX -n 60 `, 40 --Iz 0 —+ ---' m - 0 . O 7507.3 ; 50 iv W CO .- .-r -< m y 40 60 m w 0 30 __ _ 70 m 6 0 \ ,a' 20 0 20 80 _..I [) X co O. 10 A� — 90 n n I I I I I I L I L - L I I I I 1 1 1 11_1 1 1 1 I _ I 111_I __ 100 0 O O O O O 0 0 O O 00 l0 O M N 00 W. V Cl N .- {p t� M N CO a� M N ��y (0 IT, 0 0 0 00 l0 V M N • O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O v rt 0 D Cl N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • ' • 0 0 0 0 0 0 W a, N COBBLES COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE GRAVEL SAND FINES cr) SD w M m vN, £ D Z Boring or DEPTH Moisture USCS DESCRIPTION k D Test Pit No. (ft.) Content (%) LL L r w KEY rn w rtrncn �- or. cn d m 0 B-3 2.5 SM Brown silty SAND 13.8 -- -- m w 6—"--" B-4 15 SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel 11.0 -- -- DISTRIBUTION • E-7323 4 _ Copies Safeway Store, Inc. 1000 - 124th Avenue Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98015 Attention: Mr. Mitch Johnson Earth Consultants, Inc.