Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-109 „ ...t.,.... , E. ft ,` PONY.L NT ^�yy �iJ NITS UN Erb=�1fI PM j•1�„. ,?E' dW Fit . 4'r HTS ' L” ' u • , LA calloaaam .• •�'0.lf . I " • Fe Z EJ 9 O O'7.. JENNIE OMAITS tii 'G Bri 2 .. 'e TH PL. i°0,` .carD �P i4e1�� �"�O •' s ' l. $ ®ME 10TH sQ 1�.I® 1 E�i, I OTH ST. %I� 'T—",t\1? �/ f • rrL! to ft!f & !9TH ST. s • hlj�!4 rri.^35,1r. L'�.�z ��.:r.T. 8Ii ' t f r, I ry M,�ka:r/i k, A Z.: nil UI ulPL. .t r�--N'r�u�'.7 i 1 E s :1;9_THry.; }}°�sr�a'��n'- _ �. 1�.��'.11rimI Itii• .Q �I�f 2a lv�f �,/ 1' 1 I i/ , ighlandsN �� 7 Q.,, Q2 ( . Park r:".' !• ®'�.• a...+ U I a 8 i 1 i; g _ _ TYPICAL PAVEMENT& EXTRUDED CURB DETAIL 11\ . j, i15 Z - - I '7.5r 5" 2.5 `+�' Q 10'R.OW. 1.3.4 A IERNAIE LANDSCAPING ETLL - aJJJ 3 BEOCAMW 40'RIGHT OF WAY F Ili D Man' ry Bl rZ-.ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MIN. C Z O 16' MATCHEpO EXIST. illi a _a \ k2iD NE 9fn PL•. rnNE 9th PL 2"95X COIPACTED DEP1N,5/8"CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE(CLASS A), 1 1/2• j1 _p Il Z o I.i X-SECPON DETAIL 1"95[COMPACTED DEPTH.1-1/•CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE, 1 1/2" Y.Z (PER KCRS D NO. 1-002) •Y�� O Ni5 DM 8"MIN 9.COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL,AND QUARRY ROCK AS NEEDED DEPENDING ON SOIL CONDI.. -- ?yN C IIIIII 0 •I kl! _, iii! GRAPHIC SCALE 1e COTTON �I� I -��,I I'�s 30 ft VICINITY MAP Iry min ry���L//.� G I 1.��11 I/ � �� 1 L.B�TYPE I 3.3'1wDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK �JIy c Q �A�/�'�' 11"1" r ,' \ STA:1115.O] -- MIN. THICKNESS -� SpO Øi / .�.�� �� y d'Y%ODL / RAO/USROOM FlNISH. u HP 2JB I�-_i 1 o ¢v n1.6 IIIII �` ,, viiii s:1EE 1mw�'2J�. „�� MV EL 2]MV EL 2J391 SB' I� '14 �,`_� lmv BIOSWALE: s£cnoN n-A. SCALE I-5' - ' �� MONOLITHIC SIDEWALK SECTION SG'I+15 ill tilialPfiEhal& � CB/S TPEDfISFI.'iLSTA 0+1JIf (TYPICAL SW.AT PERAIETER OF SLOG) STA.2+16J1 MyEL.1] 01501.-11.23L (ON-SHE ONLY) f £ Ce 1 R/ WF ! SS S1193 FSEA6.BOL A IIel / 1.■ :VEL 17131 f ' ! My EL 1]0.1B' � 1 \ _I-1■�` 0.02R 11, . :.���.0; �I�i� OLLSET VEL 280.00 I ■ 1, ��, ,ik f�, METAL BAR fENtE a 1 I TAf16].J 1111141 I � �g �4 �� �2B' _l11 L ISEE DEL 6 SHEET I /i .., Lga il'PE I W -,J27 L ��ti�ii_lig k' ,�, S .+JB8 l /- MCWCLIIHIC SIDEWALK STA 0+01.36 s1A.1+6f.36I j _\ w qYlEL1]Q�AL 6'• IM EL. 655L OFFSET 16ADLIIWi \��_�[\\��w - .iC VEL 27550 ••��•y� zs-o RIM EL.29fl5 Rut EL 16.00 �'R NEW[1851 MV EL 265 f0 21 LY 12•CPEP WE �1 I , ..4..w, ► /� 11 •__-- Pry EL 1J0.0p 12$ re 'I � �' �� . II� �- 7, .�'a����;eg���_ �(710:2. 10M=rw cm STA J 21.2. � 13B LF 1TY CPEP I.]J[ _`R �� RIME.180.7 L 6. - �ir1�-,-� �' ��M_-- � 6 0L 277..,2 1 I:-, - A� S1A 1+ ".EI.BTLT. aftrit -�' ' •i=�� 1 - BUILDING WALL J\A T � (- " • sD.My EL 168 J3 12•CPEP ns • E 2.7. SECTION B-B, 1"=4' --- WA MV EL 26J1,10'p --- --- STA J 1R I RT (MOUND EL-280.8 5TA J+6601.I J9'II, tiMx STA 1.86 SL Y+91.p3,1AB LT. My EL.111.3$BT1C K Fat 5TA O+J209 MV 61.11A.J0 L STOMP 150 R IM INV EL 2745 6"DI WA INV EL 2]],1"DI RM EL.28194 / N.E. 9 th PL. 55 MV.EL.ffiD.JJ 50.MV EL.2750,12•CPEP I.EL 2M.90.a'A - 5TA +IJ 36 RIOFFSE1 0 40 26889R 5TA 1+13J FIBS'LT. STA 2.151147 lT. • :10.65 L INV£L 2602J SS INV EL 269.31 6"P1C SS MV EL 269.6J 6•PVC 5 47 GROIN.EL.-269.1 WA.My FL I)I.0.10•p MV EL IT.SB 12•CPEP Y SO IN EL.266.06.12•CPEP IKI M EL.261.50.101O 55'CL ARAN. a, GENERAL NOTES SANITARY SEWER NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS 0 s I. BEFORE ANY IXWSTRUCTKW DP DEL£E HELNDT ACTNTY OOCURS A WATER UTILITY - GENERAL NOTES i $ ,i H PRE-CONS/TIUCTRO IRETINS MUST BE HELD WTN TE OTT O a+ B e U RENTON PUBLIC ROM DESIGN ENGINEER. fo! ti 1.ALL WORK MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE 1NTN THE f0. A PRECONSIRUCTION CONFERENCE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY 1, ALL WORK MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND 1 2 All CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE IMCH THE 1988 STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF RENTON CONSTRUCTION. A MINIMUM OF 3(THREE)WORKING DAYS NOTICE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF RENTON UTILITY DEPARTMENT AND THE LATEST n STANDARD SPECIRCA IONS FOR ROAD,BRIDE AND MUNICIPAL UTILITY DEPARTMENT AND THE LATEST EDITION OF THE IS REQUIRED FOR SCHEDULING.PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE EDITION OF THE NSDT/APWA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICA DONS CONSTRUCTION'PREPARED BY W.S0.0 T.,AND THE AMERICAN WSDOT/APWA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS APPROVED BY PRECON A PERMIT INFORMATION SHEET MUST BE SUPPLIED TO THE � Q PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCYA 1pN(APWA),AS AMENDED BY THE CITY(Y THE CITY OF RENTON. A SET OF APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE UTILITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. TWENTY-FOUR HOUR NOTICE MALL 2. THE HOURS OF WORK IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE LIMITED TO 8:30 F- RENTER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC MORES KEPT ON SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO STARTING NEW CONS TRUC DON. A.M. TO 1.30 P.M.ON WEEKDAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY Z 3 THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO RE 2.THE HOURS OF WORK IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE 17. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ALL THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AT 235-2620. ALL STREET CLOSURES, LLJ Z APPROVED PLANS WI EN ARE LW FILE B DR:DEPARTMENT OF PUBIC LIMITED TO 8,30 AM TO J:30 PM ON WEEKDAYS UNLESS NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. PARTIAL.S OR VA SHALL OE APPROVEDDEPARTMENT, EY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC OI WORKS 24 NWRKS ANY DElIA TON FROM THE APPROI/D PLANS MILL REWIRE OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HOURS IN ADVANCE. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT,AND 9If SHALL BE NOTIFIED 21 0 WORKS AT 235-2635. ALL STREET CLOSURES,PARTIAL OR 12. INSTALLATION OF CORPORATE STOPS WATER SERVICES.LINES HOURS IN ADVANCE. PUBLICUICN APPROVAL L/I ENGINEER CITY STORM RENTON TDE UTILITY O FULL.SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AND METERS SHALL NOT BE DONE UNTIL ALL SERVICE F MOTIVES DESIGN OR WATER UBH3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS Q!V WORKS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT,FIRE AGREEMENTS,METER APPLICATIONS, CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS ACCORDANCE ASSOCIATION, PREPARED BY WASHINGTON D VIE �L ET.T DEPARTMENT AND 911 SHALL BE NOTIFIED 24 HOURS IN PAYMENT OF FEES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE CITY OF RENTON CHAPTER AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIA TION,LATEST EDITION(APWA)AND Q (n K 4. A COPY O THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE Oi THE CB 517E ADVANCE. NNENEIER COLSTRUCTHW IS PROGRESS 1J. ALL CONNECTION TO EXISTING MAINS TO ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY OF RENTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS a..H J 3.ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE CITY OF RENTON,EXCEPT NET TAPS NH/CH MAY BE MADE BY 4. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND IT SHALL 5 DATUM SHALL BE USGS UNLESS OTHERMISE APPROVED BY THE AND IT SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE APPROVED WET TAP CONTRACTORS WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TRUE AND CORRECT O d CITY O RENTON DEPARWENT 0 PUBIC NORA'S REFERENCE BENCHMARK TRUE AND CORRECT LOCATION SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. ALL NECESSARY EXCAVATION AND LOCH TON SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. Q Z x AND ELEVATIONS ARE NOTED ON THE PLANS DISTURBANCE. FOR UTILITY LOCATE CALL 48 HOUR LOCATORS. MATERIALS TO BE SUPPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND BE ON-SITE I- 1-800-424-5555. PRIOR TO CITY NOTIFICATIONS. 5. A PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND A 24 HOURS NOTICE SHALL BE REQUIRED 6 ALL SEDIMENTATION/EROSION FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO STARTING NEW CONSTRUCTION.IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS I"- PRKAR TO CLEARING AND N(C BUILDING CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THEY MUST 4,ALL WATER MAIN PIPE TO BE CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON PIPE 14. INSPECTION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING CONFORMING TO AWWA C1 f0 AND C111 OR LATEST REVISION, THE CITY OF RENTON.IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S CONSTRUCTION.(INSPECTION WLL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF Z W BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ONSTE EROSION HAS PASSED. THICKNESS CLASS 52. CEMENT MORTAR LINING AND SEAL RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS THE CITY OF RENTON). IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COATING SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C104 OR LATEST REVISION. IN ADVANCE OF BACKFILLING ALL CONSTRUCTION. THE Z NOTIFY THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE O BACKFILL ALL 7 ALL RETENTIONPIPE JOINTS TO BE PUSH-ON OR MECHANICAL.VENT. BEDDING CONTRACTOR AS WELL AS THE ENGINEERS SHALL KEEP AS-BUILT RETENTION/DETENTION OR CONAES MUST BE HALL COS AND TI TO BE CLASS C.ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE POLYETHYLENE DRAWINGS. CONSTRUCTION. 0 OPERATION PRIOR TO OR/N CONJUNCTION WIN ALL DEPARTMENT FpI WRAPPED PER ANSI/AWWA C105-77 STANDARDS. 6. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS METHODS AND SEQUENCES OF CV N ACTIN UNLESS ODERWSE APPROVED BY THE O 15. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PLUGS AND TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF T.A PUBLIC WORKS STORM WATER UTILITY. CONSTRUCTION AND FOR THE SAFETY OF WORKERS AND OTHERS ON THE r N ASSEMBLIES FOR TESTING AND PURITY ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8 GRASS SEED MAY BE APPLIED BY HIDROSEEDIING.THE GRASS SEED FINAL TIE-IN. MIXTURE,OTHER THAN CITY O RENTON APPROVED STANDARD MIXES 5.CAST IRON AND DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS SHALL BE CEMENT 16. ALL JOINT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS(SHACKLE RODS NUTS BOLTS. 7 IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND APPROVED BY LINED,PRESSURE RATED AS NOTED ON PLANS AND IN ETC.)SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED BY THE STAR MANUFACTURING AND ANY RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. �pgp THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC MORNS STORM WATER UTILITY ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/AWWA CIIO/A21.f0-82.CEMENT LINING COMPANY OF COLUMBUS OHIO OR EQUAL APPROVED IN WRITING BY "E 8 PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY L RENTON,PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SHALL TAKE W Nz SHALL B ACCORDANCE WITH CHES I WWA ETERA2f.1-85.IF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER PLANS. N O 0 6 E 9. ALL PANE AND NDATIAPPURTENANCESI DAN E TH ON SECTION PROPERLY FITTINGSECHN ARE O I S T F 11 IG SH LN BE AR ARD NAVE [r W} PREPARED NT STA77LW D ACCLRDAMCf WIN D 7-02J(I)O MECHANICAL JOINTS. THE IIO/A2 SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE E 17. ASPHALT AND CONCRETE STREET PAVING SHALL BE SA{SCUT TO A 9 A COPY C THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER ,t WITH EITHER ANSI/AWWA C 1.10-81 OR ANSI/AWWA MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO INCHES OIL MAT STREETS MACH BE z n THE CURRENT STATE O WASHINGTON STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. d ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION THIS SHALL INCLUDE NECESSARY HAVE MECHAN84.ICAL .3-INCH JOINTS TO12-INCHL DIAMETER FITTING WHICH SPADE CUT.ALL S, SURFACEICONCRETE,PAVEMENT,SIDEWALKSSAW EEa ' LEVELING O DE TRENCH BOTTAI OR THE TOP O TIE FOUNDATION HAVE DANCE WITH ANSI/AND/OR FLANGED JOINTS SHALL BE IN CURB, GUTTERS,AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES SHALLTOBE SAWCUT TO ICE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY OF RENTON WITH AN AS-BUILT UaI e` OF ANSAAR WITH ANSI/AWWA C710/A21.70-82W ORC1 A COM.53-DON A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO INCHES OR REMOVED TO AN EXISTINGSEWERv€ MATERIAL AS HELL AS THE GRADE AND THAT ENT O REQUIRED OF ANSI C1ORTION.f THE ANSI/AWWA A11.SJ-B4 EXPANSION JOINT. DRAWING OF THE SANITARY SYSTEM WITCH HAS BEEN STAMPED AND BEDDING MATERIAL TO UNIFORM SO THE ENTIRE LENGTH SUCH THAT THE PORTION OF FITTING WITH A MECHANICAL SIGNED A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OF LICENSED EPROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR.m E BATHE PIPE MILL BE SHALL BE A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING C153/A2 MAY BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/AWWA 18. A TEMPORARY COLD MIX ASPHALT PA TCH SHALL BE PLACED ON FFN BASE. ALL PIPE BEDDING SHALL APWA CLASS'C'WIN THE C15J/A21.SJ-B4 AND THAT PORTION OF THE FITTING W1TN THE DAY OF INITIAL EXCAVATION WITH A PERMANENT, SEALED PATCH 11, BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED EQUALLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PIPE IN LAYERS 71 EXCEPT/EN O PIT PIPE ALL TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE FLANGED JOINT(S)SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI/AV/WA TO BE PLACED, TO CITY OF RENTON POLICY. WITHIN TEN DAYS. LOOSE AVERAGE DEPTH A 6 INCHES MAX/MUM DEPTH OF B INCHES, A LO LO u g COMPACTED TO MIN.95Z FOR PAVEMENT AND STRUCTURAL FILL AND Cf 10/A21.10-82. ACCEPTANCE TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALL FOR SUBGRADE INSPECTION PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FINAL WTHA THOROUGHLY TAMPING EACH LAYER TO 95 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DENSITY. THESE 90X OTHERWSE PER AVM D-1557-70 PEA GRAVEL BEDDING SHALL SECTION 53-5.3 OF ANSI/AWWA C153/A21.53-84 OR WTI1 PATCH. TRENCHES WILL NOT BE LEFT OPEN OVER NIGHT WITHOUT COMPACTED DYERS MUST EXTEND FOR ONE PIPE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE BE UNDER AND OVER PVC PIPE ID GALVANIZED STEEL AND ALUMINIUMIZED STEEL PPE FOR ALL SECTION 10-4.3 OF ANSI/A WWA L11D/A21.f0-B1 SHALL BE PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE INSPECTOR. IN. FOR CITY PROJECTS SUCH AS TELEMETRY CONDUIT, THE PVC PIPE PIPE OR TO THE SIDE OF SE TRENCH.MATERIALS HOT MIX PATCH SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER. PLACED WITHIN 10 DAYS AND SHALL BE PER CITY OF RENTON CURRENT �i DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHALL HAW ASPHALT TREATMENT 11 OR BETTER 6.GATE VALVES SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA CS00 AND SHALL BE IRON USED SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 IN UNIMPROVED AREAS AND $ INSIDE AND OUTSIDE BODY,BRONZED-MOUNTED.DOUBLE DISC WITH BRONZE WEDGING SCHEDULE 80 UNDER IMPROVED AREAS ALL CHEMICAL PROCESS II DATUM SHALL BE CITY OF RENTON.U.S.C.AND G.S. DEVICE AND 0-RING STUFFING BOX. VALVES SHALL BE DESIGNED LINES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC PIPE. STANDARDS 11. STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN ID'FEET OF THE 14.A MINIMUM WATER OPERATING PRESSURE OF 200 PSI. GATE 14. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED MULCHED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED TO VALVES SHALL BE CLOW LIST 13,MUELLER COMPANY NO.A2380, SPRING LINE O ANY STORM DRAINAGE PIPE,OR 15'FEET FROM THE OR M&H. ALL VALVES 12'IN DIAMETER AND LARGER,SHALL THE SATSFACTION OF THE DEPARTMENT FOR THE PREVENTION OF ON-SITE EROSION i51 TOP OfANY CHANNEL BANK. BE INSTALLED IN A VAULT SEE WATER STANDARD DETAIL FOR AFTER DIE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.12. AIL CATCH BASIN GPATES SHALL BEIXI'NtSatD 0.10'FRET BELOW 12'GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY VAULT AND 1"BYPASS INSTALLATION. 15. ALL P/PE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED N PAWEMENT LEVEZ 7flRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE COREY TYPE(OPENING WITH THE FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WTH SECTION 7-02.3(1)OF THE CURRENT STATE OF '1 PRESSURE)CONFORMING TO AWWA C-504-80 WITH A 6 INCH INLET WASHINGTON STANDARD SPEC/RCA TONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. i '13 OVEN CUT ROAD CROSSNCS T OUGH ERRING PUBIC RIGHT-LIP-NAY AND A M.V.O.OF 5 INCHES TWO 2-1/2 INCH HOSE NOZZLES THIS SHALL INCLUDE NECESSARY LEVELING OF THE TRENCH BOTTOM OR THE TOP OF MILL NOT LE ALLOME UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE NATIONALV.CITY WITH STANDARD 7 INCH,60 DEGREES THREADS, THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL AS WELL AS PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF REQUIRED • OF RENTON DEPARTMENT O PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN ENGINEER. O.D. THREAD 4.875 AND ROOT DIAMETER 4.6263, 1-1/4 INCH BEDDING MATERIAL TO UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PIPE PENTAGON OPERATING NUT OPENED BY TURNING COUNTER MILL BE SUPPORTED ON A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. PIPE BEDDING [ I It RDA'FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF ROADSIDE DITCHES MHERE CLOCKWISE(LEFT). SHALL BE PEA GRAVEL 6"ABOVE AND BELOW THE PIPE. [ �M'E I REQUIRED,SHALL BE OF SOUND OUARRY ROCK PLACED TO A DEPTH OFB.ALL WATER MAIN f0 INCHES AND SMALLER TO MAINTAIN A 15. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PO.YNNYL CHLORIDE(PVC)RUBBER GASK£TED 1'FOOT AND MUST MEET THE FIXLOWTD SPECIFICATIONS MINIMUM COVER OF 36 INCHES BELOW FINISH GRADE. ALL WA TER 1-8/40i-70 PAD/SHE,2-A'ROCK/'Eli-IOX PASSN/S AND-2' MAIN 12 INCHES AND LARGER SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 48 ASS D 3034,SOB 35.OR DUCTILE IRON CLASS 50. 1 ROCA'//01-2OX PASSING INCHES BELOW FINISH GRADE. WERE UTILITY CONFLICTS OCCUR, WATER MAINS ARE TO BE LOWERED TO CLEAR. 17. IN UN-IMPROVED AREAS MANHOLE TO EXTEND MINIMUM 6 INCH AND MAXIMUM 18 INCH ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. IN PAVED AREA,COVER MUST SLOPE IN ALL . s 15 ALL BUILDING DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE DIRECTIONS TO MATCH PAVING. CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM,UNLESS APPROVED BY 9,ALL WATER MAINS SIX(6)INCHES IN DIAMETER AND LARGER .a THE DEPARTMENT O PUBLIC MORES DESIGN ENGINEER O STORM SHALL BE CLEANED WITH PIPE CLEANING"PIGS"PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTES WATER UTILITY AN ACCURATELY DIMENSIONED CERIRIED DISINFECTION. THE'POLY PIGS'SHALL BE GIRARD INDUSTRIES'AS-BILr DRAWING OF THIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM MILL BE SUBMITTED ARRANGE AND ATTEND PRE-CQVSTRUCIKW MEETING WTI CITY SUBMITTED AQUA SWAB-AS OR APPROVED EQUAL 2 LB\CU FT DENSITY FOAM OF RENTON PUBLIC PRE INSPECTOR. I7D DE CITY OF RENTON UPON COMPLETION WITH BOA DUROMETER URETHANE RUBBER COATING ON THE REAR OF 2. FLAG PROPERTY LINES AND CLEARING LIMITS. "PIG"ONLY. 'PIGS'SHALL BE CYLINDER SHAPED WTH BULLET I INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. ' 16. ISSUANCE OF TIE BUILDING OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT BY THE CITY NOSE OR SQUARE END. THE CONTRACTOR MILL PREFORM THE I. ERECT FILTER FENCE. Of RENTON DOES NOT RELIEVE THE GONER O TIE COTTIUWG LEGAL CLEANING OPERA DON 6. CLEAR AND GRUBB SITE OBLIGATION AD/OR LIABILITY CONNECTED WITH STORM SURFACE 6 RWGN GRADE PER ROADWAY AND GRADING PLAN. SHALL WATER MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TOWATER MU DISPOSITION LARDER,THE CITY OF RENTON DOES NOT ID. MINIMUM OF 200 PSI OR 150 PSI OVER OPERATING PRESSURE, INSTALL INSTALL STORM DRAINAGE STUB SYSTEM STORM PIPES ACCEPT ANY OBLIGATION FOR nit-PROPER FUNCTOING AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF DITCHES CB.MH,ETC. MAINTENANCE O THE SYSTEM PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. RENTON AND THE WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT ALL II.INSTALL INTERIM CB SEDIMENTATION PROTECTION. pP5 R H � 17 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRONGING ADEQUATE PRESSURE TESTING SHALL BE DONE IN THE PRESENCE OF A 10.INSTALL WATER SERVICES,METERS SAFEGUARD,SAFETY DEVICES PROTECTIVE EWA°MENi,DAGGERS ,.. OF THE CITY OF RENTON. IS FINE GRADE AND PAVE THE SITE. AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACiKWS TO PROTECT THE LIFE HEAL]H AND IS REMOVE THE REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMN TA TON CONTROL 9B.ALL WATER MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE DISINFECTED BY THE I/O SIDROSEED,MULCH.AND PLANT LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY W CONNECTION INJECTION OF A 50 PPM(MINIMUM CONCENTRATION) ONLY AFTER INC SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED AND CITY T RENTON WTI THE PERFORMANCE CC WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACT ANY CHLORINE/WATER SOLUTION. DRY CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE SHALL PEAK WORKS DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE Rf1VOVAL �i ,,, X WORK WHIN ME TRAWLED RIGHT-O-WAY THAT MAY INTERRUPT NOT BE PLACED IN THE PIPE AS LAID. CHLORINE SHALL BE 16 CYFAN UP DIf STORM ORAxv SYSTEM. I W NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL REQUIRE AN APPROVED TRAFFIC METERED/INJECTED IN ACCORDANCE MTH SECTION 7-11.3(12)E law . I 7 CONTROL PLAN BY IHE TRAFFIC fNCMEfRRD DIE Of RITE OR 7-11.3(12)F OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCED .mm DEPARTMENT O PUBLIC WORKS ALL SECTXMS O THE WSD.OT. IN 1 ABOVE. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1-07-24 TRAFFIC CONTROL.SHALL APPLY lB SPECIAL DRAINAGE MEASURES WLL BE REQUIRED 6 TIE PROECT LOCATION IS WITHIN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA H 9 In f , \ S A r 150) ` NM EL 27600 a��. ;E (n Z ipp, opr' 1: IIIII ``�_- ,\ ilv S,AA''Li:: �j Q O I Imo {�� OFFSET 41.65L - L LEJ.. Q gllidA riiii HIvEL.I1a00 W_..I EL227 91N6"�. INV EL 2]59I Sa'IL Z i4 g/6 YPE I 1'E-20' Soo 1 a` M1 STA O+B]31 OFFSET:41.11 L f-�z n:: - •� \1111PI .. Ct 0-6-1 I R+I'vu iiin I-„ -`� GRAPHIC SCALE vilitgliiit aZj sTA r+n 1 I - 1 tale TYPE I a Q n All a L �' ,I aid' n STA o+o.a I I I STA 2+193 NV EL 2713 liptitir _ I LVTSET 41.25 Lme FM> QO V=- assrsSET 46.60 L II,� 1 RIM n 22]155u r� _ a TEN Ca INV EL 270.28' /�1 TYPE S 0+69.86 I OFFSET au R ��� RN EL.284100 Ec.Inoo N I CAC TYPE I /xPII.3]l.T i, 111 , \` �,�• i� S' 0ii:L N /` STA O+OA36 STA uN.]B `�` 9\ \�� • I-`L.27850 • OFFSET.9.34 L OFFSET 16.00 L - �' w♦ - • .0 V EL 2]S30 Rat EL.1683 RN EL 21200 f1,--` �\ `:0 rIiVW„Mad A.2631 NV EL 269IO 1,LF 11"CPCP 95 ��` INV EL 2]Q00 11'N. ,�• 11 • I_ ® S II�; _ jl2\w1C_ A-,W0 -' � -I,TYPE/ at �M STA J+21.T1 ,z156 LF f2'1 CPEP r.]!i �� CO 0E • - 1� Cr r tar �� 6.00 LWf!j4i ¶ 11) NV FL I]].7(1 9 - w , 1/431,4 y � Ya ( ' --_ SO..INV EL.26G15,IT'CPEP _-_ 27 5_ E -z--O c E (-�� WA NV fl.1B1.1,10"Q' • - _ STA 3+19,1'RT. STA 1+65 STA 2+91.03,II.a'LT. NV GROUND A52.8T1C NA S MN I•r J9'RT. 11 L 51A 1+IS0IN. STA:0+3209 NV EL 27430 OFFSET.'Q91 R 60.NV EL.21A5 6'N WA INV EL 2l),I'N RN EL.261.91 OFFSET 040 R N.E. 9th PL. 55 NV.CL 268.JJ SD.NV .2 2)59,,T'CPEP NV EL 2169Q 8'A STA' +4156 I EL.26869 STA 2+151 885'LT. STA NV EL. 69.6 LT L.- l NV EL.?60.T1 55 NV EL.T69.SJ,6'PIC SS NV EL.T69.6J 8"PVC S GRp/N�EL.-Z69.T Of SD.NV EL 2T.28 12'CPEP WAN EL 26450.10.01 P SS.NV EL 26I.5 16 1 y N EL.NCE ObI o, 0.5' ARANCE 0 i • NE. 9TH PL., ROAD & UTILITY PROFILE J,O■- AI� IaI°i I 1 ,0■ mir lideicommErasitramiam � 290 I. rE FI■MI � ,�II I1_FBMM� ■_! II IMMIJM ��� !- IFfF1tv,�--- " ��_ ��_I STA J+19,I'RT STA 0+40 M ME6.00 2]0 ��'.I�� .-- WA NV EL.2]].I'OI STA 0+10 1641T .'� "'�n9Ai.+- .... .- - SS NV EL 211.52 B'PVC STA:WM M 160.6) ®� 1 IIrEMNIMMI O+M r+00 2+00 3+00 ti • NOTES B U 21 SID.STEEL PIPE-MELDED JOINTS a 10 i 1 I 1 - i/2' 1.RAILING SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION I 2.ALL POSTS PLUMB AND RAIL PARALLEL TO GRADE n PROPERTY O! �\� J/I•SPACES SPACED-J/4• J.PIPE MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A5J ((/�'�' /�f'_�/ '°'SAX CWO,F ( }\Ai AS INDICATED-HE 1/8' I.REINFORCING STEEL ASTM A615,GRADE 60. L Z 0.yc saxur— 1/B'RAISE-1/2"M10E c • G J 7_�. • � __ BORDER , 4 I Q(X d 411111r 4* B• FIBER JOINT L I 1,l ... 15 PACKING b . a L 4 1'� Z= CAST IRON RING AND COM? . . a. ' A W 1— Y • o DRIVEWAY DETAIL /6 BEND I•GROIT N In , t SIDE MMLK r- 1. ki ——— LPN CONCRETEE -�� . PLUG TO BE SEALED IN SAME a E NK DINT MUST BE SAW-CUT 11 MANNER AS MATH SEWER SAME �CD BE J_ S 4 3 B4 .44 REINFORCING U-BAR AT EACH POST 'y.z Ea — PIPE MATERIAL GUL MIN CROUP 4- w d / 7 AS SPECIFIED. CLEAN—OUT DETAIL U Ri 1,-. € EXISTING R'THAN'LT CONCRETE J'TIAEY() • ��j 6"MIN CR •USHED J-O� SE COMPACTED /Y 16 GA GALK B. P.BACKFILL STEEL SLEERE 71 *II GRANO EAST.1'MK C ASPHALT HANDRAIL FOR SIDEWALK PATCH ASPHALT CONCRETE OVER NTS PREPARED GRADE (OFFSET JOINT) 1 I. SEE NOTE 11 2 ALL WENCHES IN ROADWAY AREAS SHALL BE BACABLED AND PATCHED FOGTITE NO. ID METER BOX WITH LOCK TOP OR EQUAL. NM TEMPORARY ASPHALT AT INC END OF EACH WORK DAY.UNLESS PERMISSION IS GRANTED TO DO OTHERVASE BY DK OTY ENGINEER AND CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. FLUSH WITH FOR 3/4"- 1 DCVA USE FUGTITE NO.2 SL S ALL TEMPORARY PATCHES ON WENCHES SHALL BE PERMANENTLY PATCHED METER BOX WITH SLIDE LOCK TOP FOR 2-3" iiiii WINN 1 MEEKS O'COMPLETRMJ OFF PORK MIININ THE ROADWAY AREAFINISH GRADE I SAW CUTS ON CONCRETE PAVEMENTS SHALL BE MADE ND MORE MAN ORE- (TYPICAL) DCVA USE UTILITY VAULT CO.25-TA OR EQUAL.a HALF THE DEPTH O'DIE EASING SLAB. i __ -IL 1�'i '11�1J�.. -g_...B�..s- WATER METER TO BE 'A III LE ANCE II .I. I( •➢. SUPPLIED BY THE CITY UNION(TYPICAL) ,11- fiI ' ! BUTTERFLY VALVE `` .. _ ll SLEEVE WITH LOCKING CAP 11-1/2'x 17-I/2'CONCRETE METER W/2"SQUARE II II'1 IMF It 1 BOX R E 3n6'STEEL DIAMOND H PLATE OPERATING NUT a:*�IIIC Ili;" 3* ,, 1 3/4"MANUAL DRAIN VALVE COVER EQUAL TO FOG T1TE METER Ig SEAL CO ID METER BOB. ' 9' AFTER TESTING 6 APPROVAL REMOVE 1 I � �M� TEST COCKS FROM DOUBLE CHECK 11 IDEVALK 1� 3"CLEARANCE 1— =1 VALVE ROSY.AND INSTALL PIPE PLUGS. TO METER IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1G r4/1 1. a I I B, — al/ I 15`Idols TYPE'K•SOFT I [ TO SYSTEM CAST IRON OR COPPER TUBING 3'MIN COVER DUCTILE IRON ••P.R. P - till_ VATERMAIN 2-1/• 4"PERF.ADS TO_/ 0. FORD COPPERSETTER DRAIN OR DAYLIGHT 12" CORPORATION STOP.FORD TAPERED VM 172-15W(FOR S/B'x 3/4'METER) THREAD(CC).PACK JOINT(3/4•FISMI VH 174-1SW TFOR I'METER) END CAP (1'F1000) BOTH INLET AND OUTLET WITH PACK JOINT WITH GRIPPER. 7/8"MINUS GRAVEL 12"MINIMUM PADLOCK WINGS ON KEY VALVE SINGLE CHECK VALVE LOOP DOWN TO CENTERLINE N OUTLET. DRAIN AND BUTTERFLY KEY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO OWNER. IF WATER HAIN TO PROVIDEALL PACK-JOINT FITTINGS SHALL BE WITH GRIPPER. SLACK IN COPPER SERVICE I LINE TO METER. IF SERVICE LINE TO BUILDING IS TO BE JaIS H INSTALLED IN THE FUTURE INSTALL FORD CIA-33 DR AI I FEDi COMPRESSION COUPLING BELOW GROUND INSTALLATION FOR 3/4"TO 3"DOUBLE 3/1•DR 1•GALVANIZED PLUG CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLIES M; /1 t Z 3/4' & 1' WATER SERVICE I..... DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY • T _ u e s i U 1t11if _ — 6 _ — z 3 R/W� 86 cW z ERsnNG GROUNDL' 1"=20' � , . 0 12-MIN. — '' ' 2 GRAPHIC SCALE QTEMPORARY ROCK a d CONS7RUC770N ENTRANCE �� � �� � Ywp m l a_U ELEVATION 1. Use 4�to 8•qu0 y spoils o crushed rock for surfacing as shown. / It Q = MotNiol with fines Is of acceptable. FILM.FABRIC MATERIAL LLI 2. The 100' im length shall be Tengthened Os necessary to insure LLI material is pottracked into the public right-of-way. 1"Br Y er rA ca z z (STING GROUND TOO,AIR FAeRrc OR EOiA%RF O EXCEPT MAY BE REDUCED TO 50'MIN. N FOR SITES WTH LESS THAN 1 ACRE / N OF EXPOSED SBIL. - °YDE JMrATRENCHI nilD Pe•"IarFaL r N R.25'MM/. ( BON oN TISIDES iACE TER FABRIC er MIN. In p `15 111101 � I BY I•MOOD PoST • S O I ALT.STEEL FENCE PoSTS w z 00 sy PLAN EXISTING DRIVEWAY , ilh'\ I • MWAFl IDD XewuM DR EQUIV. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 60'WIDE ROLLS 9 RAMP OR SITE ACCESS a .y V1Iin sc'Hr wRDE°"I'rE""s m E. 3. I ROAD X 6 COTTON ,� II ))111WAID. r_ ` 1 BY 1 BYII GA REUP+A v , _ eI.�.ABRK'DI+EWe071FM , ,y'.... PRO]ECT INLETS DURING Kd�04 w $ PROTECTCONSTRUCTION.I ET KEEP 1g°OV a .. ., DRAINAGE SYSSEDIMENT TM.USE OF THE SH � ��� ,' . .'Iv BOTRWyF L`f. . CIRCLE BEN/ND CURB INLETS r _ I� v VIER/u M e By f1 IRE'. I DURING STREET CONSIRUCIWN. ,_ O IV . MODIFY PROIEC TIDN AS IIIIIL. /n CONSTRUCTION PRDGREssEs. O I IIIIII�, /p ...' 1'Br.•ROm �1 CIRCULAR SHAPE IS NOT ESANBAL- itil 1 III 1....k KT S � � VARY SHAPE TO FIT DRAINAGE AREA AND TERRAIN.OBSERVE TO CHECK h ` FILTER DETAIL FENCE RAP EFFICIENCY AND MODIFY AS - qCATCH BASIN / TRAP RAPPING OF SEDIMENT.SCAN BEMY r�,_ =' , 11M .g..4 ADAPTED TO THRU-CURB INLET. •�11L` a FRAME B C?A]F • •�:. f 4 nor'?FABRIC i ' w A FILTER FABRIC NOTES 1 7 MINIMUM OfPM-1' 1�1N� .1i ,, CATCH BASIN SILT TRAP(TIP.) MAXIMUM DEPTH-2' I I r �'I SEE DETAIL THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCHASED/N A CON nNUWS R CUT MAX THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER VOID USE OF JOINTS. EN 1 IIIII 1. , �. 7 ON,TS r A NECESSARY.POS NM AO MI SHALL BE iIN B'•OVERLAP,SPLICED ND BOTH ENDS SLOPE.1:f CLEAN w EN SEDIMENT IS I I\�� �ilm SECURELY F E POST.` FASTENED 6'BELOW OR 7E __ •r k'-• B. THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL SE INSTALLED TO FOLLOW THE ' ' 10'MIN/RUN — _ ,'�� - _NE MAXIMUM OF 6°APART AND E FENCE POSTS SHALL G SPACED a DIMENSION ��' CONTOURS FEASIBLE). DRIVEN SECURELY INTO E GROUND(41N. 1'�.. W-"Y .� CF JD). 1 LEAK WT BLOCK FMPORAR/LY w •:•_..�_— •• I • ENM,WCE C A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED,ROUGHLY B•RIDE AND I1•DEEP, 1 INSERT nix(NTH RIBS SCREEN i ' y� ��a' 15 X UPSLOPE AND ADJACENT TO E ROOD POST TO ALLOW THE FILTER AND GRAVEL FILVAIN .KSCREENpL— , _ '-EE FABRIC TO BE BURIED. a ' / P SECTION GEWA IERED. Lipillrik--- ` ,`_ ,�•�1 % D. WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED,A RIRE MESH • 1. •. SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY 10 THE UPSLOPE SIDE CONSTRUCT FlLIER G FENCE '� `;�```���,/� t�71 �C • THE POSTS USING HEAVY RIRE STAPLES AT LEAST I.co..M �` �Ur RES OR HOG RINGS E WE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A ATTACH FABRIC ID E TAG rt/rtt ���!` �y I OF.- D SHALLRNCOT EXTEND MORE THAN Ja'ABOVE THE Po' -` �4'••` •"" ` ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. — ® ►.. ` .�,�il \!=:`•:.:�..� ..f {FACE(TYP) WW-11117111a—attairinet) �� E. THE STANDARD STRENGTH Fl<>AND 20-OF TMR FABRIC SHALL BE STAPLED OR H WIRED __—L=� • ° '= , TRENCH.TH THE FENCE, FILTER"GROUND SURFACE. SHALL NOT EXTE FABRIC END MORE THANL EXTEND NJ6'EABOVE E ORIGINAL ACE.FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO EXISTING TREES. .00 F ENEXTRASIRENGM FLTER FABRICANDCLOSER POST SPACING ARF USED,CASE.THE FILTER MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY BE ELIMINATED.lW SUCH I — `�— ' MP , •— POSTS WTHEALL OTHER PROMSKINS OF STANDARD NOTES APPLYING. 22 J 6; G. THE FENCE SHALL et BACKFILLED(NTH S%•MIN....Erre WASHED 1TB N.E. 9TH PLACE ze• it GRAVEL. A - M FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOKD MHEN MEY HAVE SERVED SA 3s68.01,1.39'RT. THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE,BUT NOT BEFORE RIE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN '•' FAS or SS MN. PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. IC I STA O+J209 N.E. 9th L. RIM EL.28191 L OFfSEP.OXO R INV EL.27E90.811 FILTER fABA O ATCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY;AFTER,.RRA/NFALL LEAST D ILr IMOOD/ALONGED RAINFALL. 3 I RIM EL.MBB9 REWIRED REPAIRS SHALL MADEIM TELY. u I EL.260., Y IX Y • o _ _ _ ccrw£cr r•AIR YAP.ITELEASE u1r'SS' .e.Ne eR �iPt1i — — � �f ^ — — • ° sue=� % o� \ 10'r I'TEE LOC '�'A 7y�-s. 7 I'PLUG W.BLOCKING QTCX-4 10"VERTICAL CROSS(YJ) L P F 3I TEMPORARY OROYF�r CONNECT WIN{•SLEEVE(N,) I �...AA ••••F-••,v —h{'NIPPLES TO NT TO TAPPING VALVE cW 0 {•r.•TAPPING IRE(NJ r FL) (9IAGQE TEE TO VUVE) C Z {'TAPPNG VALVE(FL x W) eT. 12 Li E0_ a I STA 3+19, 91N PL. TEST CONNECTION STA 3+19 9TH PL. FINAL CONNECTION I a.c_ Qrn STA 0-11.75 9TH PL. TEST CONNECTION —=�,. ZlLl 16•r NO"TAPPING TEE(NJ r FE) x ;=r: � Z 10'TAPPING VALVE(FL x NJ) T�., � a TO'PLUG(NJ W.2•BLOND,ASSY..) Zr....... CN N in 0 a � f — FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY w. �z EX 6 90 I• A '—• m�� Q O i E 6'r I'REDUCER �vt1?(.31m. �i �0,1 a naa ' mr rw F =4 COTTON � ,...���II , 1���. �I R �.Z s W W Ex e'p. ro'VERTICAL CROSS!Y✓.n) y-yRr���1l � T F-I w �4 Z J-10"PLUGS(WO; ".'`�����Il��'I ` EX 121. ONE W.T•TAP tr PLUG +iTwT��_ _ • III-- �1 U PG 'as ONE W z•TAP et eioLroFF Assr. 1 �� �'��'�� •••..:••••` TEMPORARY BLOCKING 11I i � ' \ .W. ^ m E Q .vY� i g O AFTER Pp WICG PRESSURE tr%/R/rY TEST,REN01£TEMP. 1r.�/ ■_- NW 1!J_20 I a ens,r✓x.,orrow 0 • PLUGS E ALL BE AND CONNECT W 10'SOLID SLEEVE(Y✓) I/ '���-.II II II' � ° Q ;a PLUGS(B ALL BENDS TO NNECTG VALVE.) I IIIIIII-�1 196111 '.-Fitz' slit:,,_ IOh W _- - • GRPHIC SCALE r a,<.xtK vr..m. 1 �"',y 1$11,01-14--41sill : o n �. .m1.1 i1ltSTA 0-11.715 9 PL. F/NAL CONNECTION I- I'I1. TEMPORARY: aoWGRFArmreY �- Ili , ����,• • �,.K,W _sr o-n.]s,9Rl sT 1B'LT 11111VL ,IIIIIII,� ' �� ��'x .,)B,w ram.eiocKwcE ru..YrL) :a° r. C'': _�I ..,,. .: .error ^ 10"TAPPWC VALVE(RrY✓) ,t �• Os{S6Tr'- e j 5A •'tcc f0'PLUG(4JJr .,n6.68 R ice+ IS'0 IM N 1 E P BOON kF ASSY. ' ' ��i B'r. EE(Mw i) :. 9112E • fB'1ERTrOAL(w✓xw) cA u1f(FLxw) I'. ." .y,�r� �► = r:z:f ..IJ-10•PLUGS(4✓); 1\ �� 6FWE1D.ASSY.OYEW1"TAPANDPLUG g 0•FlR•'E$' . CROSS'FLN \ /T•alXi. OVIE W.2•TAP tr BLOMOFF ASSY. L--J i..-` `� .rT tam B'-UG( () AIR tr VACUUM JJJJ�:"` � ' .•PL ( W 2•TEMP. RELEASE VALVE A65Y STA:O+T199 \ ' C BLO. ASSY.OFFSET.`2084 L II— , \�`\`�� �` -l� ' .R •:'OCKYNGg f0-ussEnroI�M'�\i �\ 0,��-_=9�\�/Q��.z�3ii . ` STA:J�IB68 r•"'°• "r,•••' W ccwa BLOCKING ��' I�f.;(-4.=\�I/`\_ OFFSET.'Bs.LaammamHap• •�•�•rt ® B a.{"TEEA(YJ) �� . Y AW tr c Assn. a�WILL M� �� '—a�—_—___�—t�_7_: ����di—WI� {-VERTICAL CROSS(4d'FL) '`u�i ���I��/��l\I/mt•�i t��� {•a SLEEVE(NJ) W;� ro a m 1_ — _`� � ` `��I��- I . E _- {•p LENGTH AS REWIRED i s... •, ��- �varas akva v. 1-1'BLOWx-T ASSY. _ _ s �il�_. I-{'BLNO RANGES ONE �� STA., ELBTLT ' '� - TAPPED 2'I'PLUG — �� E e, 1 N JAPRIN71BLOCKING 0(4JxFL) panwewev rWr-m A _-- SD.NV EL 268.74 f1"LPEP016 Its {'CONCREAPPINGTE VALVE.LNG(FL r moat .rr�amr.vAmcsaerz may ml.. WA.NV L1.367.4,IO'p N.E. • •CE z,r O W cvwc6ETF Bta pc --- -- -.._ LRp/NO EL8�TB0.8 xrv.s o0 R MI STA 2481.03•I{.6'LT. ,, Nv EL I]l3;BTVC EXAM T•TJ9'Rr 7:.... S!O�JT09 MX NY EL 27A4 6'p Wt WV EL Tll,1'0 RW EL.IB{.9{ 5.I f1FFYT.040R N.E. 9th PL. 50.INY EL 2>'3.8,II'COOP STA Is9I.0,; 66Y LT. Wy EL IM.90.BY STA: ♦N.36 R/4 EL.26689 STA I�IS.j BB3' T. NV E!.I>AO ''B . • 0.65 L NV EL.260.27 STA Is]211,B8T LT. SS WV EL 260. 6''VC f0 i 6'TEE(PAWN) r.r..mnmr Wu GRd) EL.268.2 - 6'GALE VALVE(Fir)✓) B SD p £L.266.08.12"CPE0 STA O9 MK 6'EL 26].4 IVY IN/NV EL IT.a O'. 10•GATE VALVE rmr.rw m i arr".re`.ur Pau.W["' ONSET:9.34 f0'+6'IEF AWL, G IN EL 264..5a IOb, ID'2238END 6'GATE VALVE(ILWJ) 2' B.PLUGSLU CROSS(ON 0.3'. ARANLE W.LXMC.BLOCKING STA: T 8.818 11/{'.AMGiKW NEVER w2-B. (M✓)•ONE S NNMANr ASST.11'LT OFFSET.B61 L tr DCVA. W.1•TAP&1•PLUG W CONK.BLOCKING I"SEANCE TAP, W.CONCRETE BLOCKING I"METER JT LT WI I $ D. g,ra�sf e , J Imo % r .� l ( ) IIIIII F— Q Ill/� III NI t` I Z 3 O t� i` �� w of W I�� tia �� a "=20' F— , L J Z " MCQ 0 �, ` GRAPHIC SCALE ii. a s n� i-n i 1• '1 I�R 1 I Q cc x STA 0-II.71 DIY ST..lets 11 , ■ •20 n I.LI 16:10"TAPPING TEE(IWO IIIIIII��� I,■ QI R CONC.BLOCKING Ilik Q 10'10•PLUG )KI£(RANI) --7 HEM-� S •'0.6.691 R Z Z R 1•IEYP.BLODN;ASSY. / 1. E£(Y FL)10.VERTICAL(Kau) I • GA VKl{FirIEJO 1 J- 0•RUGS(Y.Q; I �, `� .' _ • �MI 6 TIRE ID.ASSY. )M'FR 1'TAP AIA RUG ,N OVE W.2'TAP t BLOWY ASSY . F®' R CRO55 L).4n • -.l'alM 99 Oli G( R2 RCP.N sr BLOOAL \���\`�\\���/1 rI �C � . GY,0.22sHE� \ 1r_� �1 \�l © rSTA J+1B89 R OI1JG BL0L11'MO ee31'19 i 1I �/ 1 • tak 1'NA t VAC.ASSY.WZ :-r- •_ ,•.rwnCAt cDoss( i✓aR)1•DI LENGR/AS REOLPRED L-•� t, 1-2 B ONO F ASSY n O _ 2-/'BLIND RANGE$ON£ Arr" 1.114 wi, 4.0 �_� .c14...-Ii �� STA r+sr ItB2ZT -___-'1PP - _ -1 2 -1.. -- > TAPMDY.Y RUG z A SD.INv EL 26675.11'CPEP 1]5 \ ^," I --- RA.INV EL.26]1,ICU! -_ N.E. CE - - z., O STAOn.11 ERT. R CONCRETE BLOCKING ii GROUN g. STA 2+91.0;KS'Lr. ,, IS NV 21A52.B71C SrA J+6801 I.J9'RI a g I r•_ STA'0+1I09 M MV EL I)6.5,6'DI EL 1]].A•O RWA EL 28494 N.E. 9th PL. SD.NV EL 275.9.I2•CPEP STA`1+910 B6r LT. INV EL.276.90 e•R Sr NAJ56 0{T EL.O.AO RINV OFT RN EL.26689 SS 1+,5;8B3' T INV B•TEE(Y.Y75+I. 10.65 l My EL.26021 -STA 1+7211,8D7 LT. A NV EL 26D.5;B• K GRCIY!CL 68.06. STA WI6.69 RA NV EL 1B].A 10V1 Et WV EL 171.0 6.• B'GAT VALVE(55(N 4 so NV EL 266.06.IrCPEP 0FlSE1,9.N L ,0,,6'TEE(YdfL) 10'GATE VALVE(W) I WA MV EL 26450 10•UI 0 2238EN0 B"GATE K E(E KLL) VERTICAL s(NJ)NO 0.5'CLEARANCE 8..CONE BLOCKING HYDRANT ASSY.222T. Sr,.2+1D.BB I IC'IRRIGATION NCTCR 2-6•RUGS(W).ONE R.CONC.BLOCKING OEFSET.'QBI L t OL A R 2•TAP t 2'RUG 1•SERVICE TAP, R CONCRETE BLOCKING 1•NERF JY Li. i.ii 1 1 • NE. 9TH PL., ROAD & WATER PROFILE Jr0■ immEssfram r 1''° I J00■ . .�I� sionsraviesreezm r, lC 290" Emmmozroom 2eGlrIEMIIMIMMIIBMMNifiEciWigINMI III -, _1®■_��_ III 1IM_J_I'' I III ���--L' -._I RSTA 3419.A MV EL 1211,.'0I S9A0+10 ELEV 488.00 2l0 �)II�'�� -- ffli "� �ii,_� - SS MV EL 2]A52,B'PLC •STA O+AO BLEY A61.A2 �� ��.. ...... STA'0+M REV'46061 �� 21.1.111111111M AV.ay.117.0 . \R N )_� STA J+I6D.836'L p m - ®=BM � ,01COME"TEE p R jr R I - or"`r=a BEuV , 11=MMIE=="1 Imm w. 0+40 .00 2+00 .5400 7 i g 4 • ° S 8851"'9" E el :r-12.• w NOTES I r O Y Y r w w Y Y v cl ena15 l l l S 88 51'59" E o•';> LAWN. '" PLANTING NOTES: ' - - o;: wt..wr r,s.w'a SI.mraar r. 1a.r,Wn Y-Cal TO IN aa.o,m".mc wv m wo®.c e, .Y••� f-WI M �. �:•••. '''� ALL 011111111.F.FOP ILMFT Pena.fr1.0 Ard0 WAR NW WWI n e.e.r ame.M YG ,e Q .. (d� a y.e ma,.py, YR. n �O 11a.,o. ... -_�\ ti • •, _ -1 O .nmma,a a-a 30 1, Kh Q (o/0'�g) Ij:. .4. 10 wusmima�oms,vm r. ' ,.., cis ur ru n mrtrm.e,va _ 00 1 � � � in ...,tea,..�a C 3 ':' �00 i, n �ia°o0i""5 8-05 2e l�ti,"� ,``, 00 Arctostophyfos ovo—orsi 24'O.C. 4'pots 0 �, m.p at...a v... a• eo 0 • • "a,a..ea.�6 W",w 0 O O Pachysandra t. 24" O.C. - 4"pots. IRRIGATION NOTES M,+.' Q II Olt O 0 0;':.. o O:: LAWN O o'. , pp ro I W.0 . 4 oa �00 o `:-• ` _i. 000 OO k;N.:r,..: : :. �OO:O:O 0 Q 00 oo oo za Opp + a; it:' • . ... 00 �-.. • II �H' I� oNO E: IA. LAWN ;. , OH N Q... o • ,At10 li, * . rQ ODuo a.lamas T . ," O0 1i _ � ' 000 Vinco Minor 24" 0.C. 4"pots O • O rt=u-il PEP __ l O O ,� ... °s `�h)�� liiil=l --I----- © �O °` OHO OOO %O �00 � Q+O ..e,w' n l: G �lvi111 l I II II II II II I 1 oui—ioo'.n 11o=II11L=11 — I II 11 �;:.. _._.-____ _ �j1 Tb lOs Ai9O� • I- n=u=R=1 -= G � :its ', O r.. . i O1.'.' LAWN O "' ''Y .: N 8851'S9" 'W' SHRUB PLANTING [� 0��. LAWN MULTI-TRUNK TREE STAKING , , CQO S 8851;59" E 96.40' ��4�. 65.OS' Ems OAF Clifford Quality Landscapes Renton Apartments 5g�$91 Scott Redford r 2815 NW62nd Street Seattle, NA 98107 25xx NE 9th �9 ap Data. VSv99 ' a I 425-864-2797 Fax: 206-285-6570 Renton, WA Landscape Planting Plan i '1 �1 SCALE 1"--10' Ir L-1 TTER ROOF DE..LoAo waN,..A,,. � ME 1 \4 \ "_ _ =ai • __ �t � I� FERRARI DESIGN II 1 , Ii . „, _� GROUP • �I I ,. . NOD a a. a "°°° 9,°,=,.,,.— 0. iii REDMOND npa; s i"-"`°90> \ ' I Ik s \--.-`_ o..��''"."�F':x�:`� .:�u;'ww'u�.n ll MACES PM So TF 203 ° m I aG i .No�E aR,oa�`w;0 .NGNnEN.. iiiiiikAllil I I II KMM 'tit:4'17E4 IT _ 1?-�_au, e.- , _ a TI :T Ar PJLP!11U ' MIMI • saWaR. r. CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS ROOF FRAMING PLAN BUILDING SECTION SCALE va°I-0 25v N.E.NiwNN Place Renton.Washington _ �" SO°� n.s slsr MalsNnON: JJ` Swew,Ex�Sw ROOF PAPER.0r,21 ROOF FRAMING \ PLAN; „„, a — ,`o- N.N = a� , . ELEVATIONS; ,AscA DETAILS; DEAN, PER POSTS SPACED PLAN O Roo,A`AN"°`" GERALD RIEKER &SOUNG HEE 4AM"y°R r 11017101st Plane // ` I Kirkland.WaNingbn 9803 Rom...eRes AND Cam. �`:G.E,�O PAN e NIA TYPICAL ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION AMOR MIS PER ROM PL. BASE SIZED APP.DYED Br TWOS noAPAGTuRER PRIOR TO AS MAILED ON ENONEER CONGRETE Fpo,NE. ADDIBONS TO N.PLAN TO BE SJE.TTED AND aA ',D �,a .ua..„,,, F.AMI� , EAN a�N2. G D �..E.aaa ,Da rrp i nEreeRS GE,TB....BERME ANT LOAD GI.PLACED Tre MALL BE NaEO.D E ALL Y o� ! BEAM DETAIL /� POST BASE DETAIL OaWAY am+NN NB�>. 1 SCALE No SCALE 2 Pa..Naa } SCALE ND SCALE 1 SD2 1 �.e �DD5�51„E I 1 Y FERRARI R sren R � DESIGN --�\1�\ �8 g r REAR',AD SET..Lite ^"�^ GROUP 4 V �=sea•515'e _—_ �e� III a` yo'�i aba sue• y 4 4 RAIDED R ��DDT a[ se AT MAUS!PAO w310R EI h[[•[E F b.•4. RWR TARD NE�>'-0' .. 1-4' \., 3 ((//''���' h ll N 11111111�1 Rom. I (/>o'A �E t VICINITY MAP CIVILIPLANS • 1 ,aRE•o/ED R s Reis td I ' I 211 I i-.711.4: •LEGAL DESCRIPTION RA ATJ /-LINE ON CARPORT OV°` `µ R57(�� MNER FLOOR 2 I S.TYPICAL SAO a 2.:LOT 104 AND• MO., LT'I5-PARCEL A04905+r11504 5-T-R 0,-2505 LOT 1115 OP N 11/4 DES - - - 2 -- ALE E N OF SD RAID Isor,PT TN RA 4,5 FT E•EAS AT NA • "� CAMBRIDGE FRW THE SOO.PM01..1/4 OP WV I/4 GP SW Ia COR 5 • OF SDSEDTw.00-.43o Hse..D.w y.se PT To ww LN LN OP E lna -- — I`P APARTMENTS >o S ALe PT N/L TO Poe LEW ST. • LOTIO.-PARCEL 451250,4104-00 STR 04-35.05 LOT 4ro4 OF E.OF NW — _ I/ W OP N DO PT OF S MO PT 5W 1/4 OP NW I/4 LIM ST • PROJECT DATA OUT 8 zs.,NEv5Te(rate 1on Renlor was7;�ro� 4 ZONED RM-C(RESIDENTIAL pp MULTI -DID4ReAN oo.m4) /AI cooE2.11413 BUILD!.DATA! Y ' 17 R 9 SITE PLAN; 2'7 APPLIED FCR• I 'UNITS AT •5DUILDIND5330 04 P 8 g L. 5�nAroc1RN5PsrnIPPIw ^ LEGAL DESCRIP. SF-C ROO FLOOOROR••SA s:P : 2 ° • lb gS 8 SITE DATA; DwTS •AcANT PARKINS REa,IRED•Is STALLS PER 6 g _ b $ ? $ SITE DETAILS DARER oPD6euiLVlrO6 ACRES/ STALLS PER Lw rxnn $ e a �PRwIDE STEPS 0 FOOTPRINT_ �Se SF REmIRm.x1 i PER SITE i' .RAAB S.F. i µALSSTALLS PRO./IOED 31 STALLS -TOTAL T!LOroIn�5 Z LAND .A AREA 15,5 55, ALLOWED.3V-0. UNIT -I f — i 15 DUILDiNS PROPOSED: 55'0' OREM BUILDING/SITE NOTES _/ — 7 NA"D'I;` S• 4 GERALD RIEKER / 1t &SLUNG HEE I. REFER To CIVIL PLANS FOR BRAD.AND Dw 1N EEINFORMATION. — ( REOUIRE.ENTS 4 2 BUILDINSS TO DUPED 2TN A nLL FIRE ALRAW SYSTEM \ `. - i - no111a1NPb sPluEuoa REn • 8 I3 gAlnA.WEESYgbn NOS ROOM I'WOW LATTICE POST CAP • SET IN IND FRAME NEATER PROOF SEALER CLEAR Ir 3W1T 1 k 12 enR: p I I. 4 WA SET 1N caNa4eTe .44l , a 10 mVEMAPROPOSED v I I L o"RE REE 1/2,45`'ED• S NISN 000'SeTAI•CR Lira --- PLAN. J 'EE"°"E° Ip FENCE FRONT YARD • LEo,m - AIL j 7C " mmCAL 244 PM SAID COHC. ^ -- _ D ALDER TREE MOONS FDDTINRMBEE LAWNS ' 5 411; ED A� SE REMOVED FENCE DETAIL Oit 5�5 �^'e�' * I I � PNDDDE e NPO'S fl'SAL•E �' RED i •DITTO DE SPRAYED 4/CLEAR § ROOF T. 'UTEER PROOF SEALER OR NEW 1-DDRA E WILD. NTEDTOMAT.EDLIDN5 POST CAP 1 1p M.••••••••. OPT.NEWSPAPERrom .0 CORD DM C 5 6.3 PREEAF>4E .1 MILD >1M ■POSTS — • ---- --NE9 THPLACE ;::: Ii!IOI ;:DST -------------- • ----—p ,. D..•w 2.4 P.T. 1 `.LTAI., SOLID CONC. IRSISTRIVARION FOOTED MAILBOX DETAIL O SITE PLAN SD1 xr4.e.ND xALe xALe.1••Ioc N mId AIww ri FERRARI DESIGN GROUP UM 00ICOLIIT 00111.1 00000104011100 TON af 0.00 v 31 , ,, : i :'' .:J '''''''::', ' :OS .rti:1 ),i '''1:-::. 11.1 .1.dr,'.'i ,J;' .,,';:':'. :: ';':. :r'li',';;;:;:' -H.'4'„','i::*:','.',i,'.iiM; ,, . ;:,<'.*,' :-;;;),-.; ,,„.: .:.",- ::, .,;:.' ,-s,,-.'‘,, ,.: `*',;,,* ,,,..>, ' * .:•-'.x,-;:,.',L,5.,;,-',,,...x.:.x;.`-',,-.*,-:,,,':..„ ,-> ),./<,',,, ,,i;`-.:,,,-',; -.,, ' ` ,5 �,; ti,1` 'a, ;v;` 4,. ,ti' '' ', ,4` .�'''';.•.n. CAMBRIDGE �,a ` S' APARTMENTS J� v,1.'a' 111• imm MIMMI 1 1 •11 Il _--- [nlaua ]Su NE.Ni,rola Place Renton,Wash.on SE Wren ALf.l EXTERIOR --- 'lo e»o DOA. __ I.b...,�,o.,o - - Flo e»o BOARD --- FRONT ELEVATION IiI •I as Iw IWO eowo WIC soap--- ! :i ® . , , - ---- GER ALD R IEK ER -— &SOUNG HEE l TI _ 11?__ ee,oe��� - - _� • � Pia. �o Kaa�awagmr,eo3 w Rff � li n N/A NOW L.0.21•15 POW setooe Wen. TITKAL AT BMW FRONT ELEVATION V'0 A. Va•I O' p�Derry IEFFERNAWCII Th*1y CIOLTIENNY Yraa., Mart MAW. 5 Al MI 1I= FERRARI DESIGN GROUP A it t AMMO. REDMOND WASIMIPTON nR 6.12 �r r 6.1] rcac<. 1 ° 1° CAMBRIDGE 6,13 �r 61 61� 2 6 r� �r r� ma.o noo.a,.� APARTMENTS 51::''';''"" I MEI- 1 ■■ rn urnIiiiil•limminumumnummimmigmilmmummillmoluEXTERIOR w � I1iH . I11•11T REAR _ - ELEVATION . I ME 1 r I 1 ars DIME ILEInn ..Tiapn na VOW COMO. 111111111111111111111II11111111111 II1111IIIIII1111111111111 Ifl1111lll 11111IIIIII 1111111111111111111IIIIIIIIII 111111111���1����111111111111111 Ea i.w e.lorw..u „ba„ps,,,m �.,,s,,,p,,,,mS'12 GERALD RIEKEF &SOUNG NEE LIM OF FINS., {{IL_ _ 1■1 1■1' M h ace ace `ol.'"°` �.�.oww..,�, NIA REAR ELEVATION 'CALL. VW•1O' °o�rm•o V nwrt.m V xw. Pwnly C14En611v A2 t .w .1>.. ri FERRARI DESIGN GROUP �., ,,•`••,}f;�ti - ';a�;'r•�,'' ' { �� 12 CAMBRIDGE er •.Y- �] � �.1 �'•��'f� ti51 • APARTMENTS Rent.,Wrilnato III I EXTERIOR —_—_ ___—______ SIDE ----- - ---- ---- ELEVATION4=7..""'"FACep"'S.4'2" L LAIPT PAW IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII - ---- GERALDRIEKER --- i I ° I 1=1 ��iiHiiiu w Y &SOUNDHEE 6mulilii�ii�ll►��►i�l!f mn mmno ww,a,wW:,amn ema. MMI 1.1111111 TEN., -- - - --------- 7`----- ------- N/A INN TP1 AT YONSIM • 9010.1 SIDE ELEVATION - W.A.,V,•.• i.ry • _2 PayCAATIERANY .m� .r A A3 M14 �1TA ;, ' FERRARI • DESIGN GROUP Rids PK5 OM . a .ncxmrn vs V - , T37 tl 21NIN6 17ININ6 >zlalelit tt kWh* LLVJI9 1> a LJVINe - 56 LIVINs `--.''Ira. t. 177 _-1.-- -= -_- __ _ .o,raNn �_- a.. t�, KITCAEJ ,, ,:0,,.»,I.ev+e D a ISM EN 151IG1C1 D a ex..�x�xe il - KITCHEN el __ _J __ __ CAMBRIDGE _ 7 APARTMENTS ,� 1 III �, Y ® mms ata =ET a me. 16., a Nine,P a �� �� �2618 - 1 1;I I I I'4-1�1 S Mill 7 / J -u r� t i t i SHEET 00..004 UPPER LEVEL \,/ ,_1 Q \/L feces FLOOR PLAN 42.1100. gin. C. p•Hex 000:00.0 0 V--- .41)/1 --)- BEDROOM BEDROOM f �M 1' ..__ 8 y, e II >x am. eQ 3 n ill 1 i ; 6 — GERALD RIBBER i 8 SGUNG HEE © -� ® © A 11017101SP100 el Qi 0 K.a.a.weliu ,l eeor Dwane.. L Iv MISR TO ONSET f00 FOR STAIR NYT100 .e. ve..ua...wcK o�.eelow..w ve..lu STAIR SUCTIONS .,, T}D ; MT}A AlT T WA 000, UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN •=t-.- imo nm x LL GvnM ti2J. ®u0 OG,T4041 Ie.hNGxL. 4,SOS OM U t OONISSATS ATM TM O,AT LTA MAW MOWN .�.0. 3 0 �. ,00„�w.uv,Z e<�� xeOe n,hFOS00 NA. p ,_ L �.. 414C 40 n A6 • Aso n=•� aeo > vc C '• Y Y y FERRARI DESIGN G ROUP • MA r Agri sacs a a=n 6 I ® v UM Rt3 WREDMOND aNio.ax 2aNthl LA DINING QINM .ncwrtcr ,,' j,IVIN$ © LIVING D a LIMN! 0 LIVING r 7.�)s— 77 al I rza S J$IjG}JQ� w.wnnarms As.i.ro KITGHCN KITGIlN11 El =aveR f MEW y� �. ® -- -_ - J APARTMENTS _ CAMBRIDGE ■ I — _ I �� -+« II�� 393f �111 ii ®iiii PSv,SIE meth Raa II , 1 (1 _I f� /1- ■_ 4 !�7li I, „, L I „ / w mL DdItl pdTi w w QdSM canon,war qa III „ mffi CM= „ , u l ___ ___ ___ MI MET 011.0.110S MID LEVEL v---\/ EOM \/---\� --- __= AIM \/--___ \/---\/ ems --- FLOOR PLAN © v o 12251/22M .11: DE2S/22M i BC/2602±I '" III i j , ,i ,�111 u j GERALD RIEKER - &SGUNG HEE y11017101st Place Kirkland.WaaM,glnn 9B03, AM E?1 MISR TO INS.S.rOR STAN MM. UWT 2 1 w• ro.we.w oer•�u.,rn°..�INT 2-5 WIT 2-4 wwe�we rw rnat TO SoeST Nu`,.�INT 2-0 N/A • aa•<• MID LEVEL FLOOR PLAN70.7 ae.ae•Ww.,b• O..,F, H. MK CO... °�i °` A5 1- FERRARI y'Q DESIGN ' GROUP • irk ELF 1 v ® y y �� - — _�.. MONTECT � Ai _ may, - 15LZG3� KITGIOd IF TLIP// �,,+1 0 N LIMN! I LIVING I LIVING rws . lrMdlO PTIDOARM M 1. e. CAMBRIDGE AEI, POWERS AS=SKATED DQldl� D a � ® APARTMENTS ® El 0 � L. ZiiE i m ® T ® m�i -h \ _ u� ® 4 wow,,wasMreron D J NU. .,; II u - ;n. ��»i,d1L."/ I .�r.a..mx: 1hI!!— mil •u� ni ��� �MTh CdSti �� I �� "i�� a Ad[t! LOWER LEVEL MI ��• z IM C W FLOOR PUN a D - a D LEMMA I -- L; -- i 1L .0 \I - -- <7Wir.1 .1� - -- ��% GERALO RIEKER �1 II � � II noscam &SOLING HEE -- ,,,,,..,,,,,,,, �� -.- MI= �� -_- III �■�� II/. 14M1lana'Nasn nglon s]ui • kl •ip —01 Pomo,As idLS L s � IB : BI l&I1LI l our l c R O2.» yrur l-o • • 1 1� d11. la I II .a • • p.«m*. Iti < v C«raK I D il II]'<' p�M1A�..�.....,w.W w LONER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN NJ Haas SHEAR WALL DESIGNATION PA o.a.ap r _ w npOi[ bm+�wrR n.Ewmert D ,^p C ...MT SOO M pPLATE MOAT AT ALL Te�vwwa°ww. O SE Mir 5.1 KEW ENALCNO ALL OLDS CO,WORM,rreancoe.Ao NOT SC.N.E AMR TO toNSUGRALN. orrm 'u' AM YEAR MA PAGER MATO ne c.w.o.Ix MARS SNOM ME'NAGS.MS SMALL ME LEM PER LEM Ot NALL IMOMMATICR © t U SIZE AS REQUIR 0 ALUM WALL BRACKET 16'MIN. ALUM.ALLOY CORK-T6 8 m /q CM FUSE KITS 2'KP.S.SLIPFITTER g P 1p QUICK DISCONNECT 14—.{I ♦ SLIPFITTEa Ao I^i KITS AMP S.E.C.LINE FUSE TO LUMINAIRE -r 0.D/2 2'N.P.S. • R.- KITS-S. OR EQUAL 1m A xEL 5'-9'RADIUS 3 TYPICAL DESIGN'B' WITAIVAZ 1/2'BNC LOCKBOLT JUNCTION BOX '—BREAKERS AS RED'DGR.18-8 S.S. j NI- 1/4'MINIMUM rat'.EW 2 FLUSH JOIN i 1'-2' / GROUND LUG DRAIN HO I4' BRACKET CABLE 4- -E I SPLICE KITS till j I 1/2'D.D. • O CLEAR�NEPDXY SPLICE 1 • WIRE RUNS L THRU [�pp . Q W 50 POLEUBASE TOP OF CONCRETE N FOUNDATION TO /' .2'MALE LI. Cr FL CONCRETE I BE LEVEL WITH FEMALE MQ _ III TOP OF SIDEWALK —�BUSXINGS 2'BY 3/4'REDUCING WASHER TAPERED ALUM.POLE Q/^� 5' I���1�� OR CURB. PE CELL 0.188 WALL ALLOY 6063-T6 _o..1 <.111ONB1 1_ 0 © TERM.STRIP SATIN GROUND FINISH IZ 0 a Mg_ ,timirll•1IMIIII•I�=1I1'III f 48' �© Q Z= =IIIIsI III III=III— _s 11=IIII=IIII TEST LGFI e'-3• NONE I III-IIII-IIII=1 SWITCH RECEPT, 3/4'ROME%CONNECTOR SHAFT �_ If! I_ VITH LOCKNUT F—_ GROWD WIRE R�,IIE.III IIISINGLE OR DOUBLE MAST Lam/ W RWND 4, LIpN�iTp����( ARM AS REQUIRED ^ 3/4' N...I jilt- CLAMP .:�� 4' - RS IIRE^OT�ID7S _/ L V 2-(SIZED AS REDID SY TtrM NDUIT u SERVICE \ 151 HANDHOLE. 4'K6'OPENING r EV LIGHTING SYSTEM I L . • FEEDERS V/COVER AND S.S.SCR V WIRES TO CONTACTOR •) I RACEWAY FOR DOUBLE MAST ARM,INSTALL 2N0 CABLE GROUND L CONCRETE BETWEEN LUMINAIRES WHEN BOTH LUMINAIRES BASE FLANGE ALLOY 356-T6 WITH "- FOUNDATION J- r COVER 1'6' 6 ARE ON SAME CIRCUIT BOLT COVERS S.S.S.SCREWS 11 5/8'08' • C. T COPPER-CLAD 3'sQ.OR DIA. TYPE III SERVICE CABINET MAST ARM WIRING DETAIL {�I1-1/4'SD. O O .I GROUND ROD DIA II'TO BOLT CIRCLE E. I TYPICAL LIGHTING 4'CONCRETE FINISHEDFGRADE BOLT ABOVE Y' F z aW w 8a¢ UNDERGROUND SYSTEM AN I'BNC GALV,STEEL -.�+.!..--L („)a vE ANCHOR BOLTS WITH Li'IS�H - EPDXY FILL EPDXY FILL NUTS AND WASHERS . I' .E IL 1 71 a' 1..----7, J I- INLING SPLICE INSTALL DECAL NUMBERS o I' 4YE SPLICE 1 DRY VERTICALLY INSTALL STANDARD 25' DAVIT POLE SPLICE KIT OR ABOVE. SBE �Ibl���il7LY �4�+tT 4'DEEP UMBERING EXAMPLES El Fl II La El ri El STREET LIGHT POLE JUNCTION BOXMEM S <EDIED PREFIXED DIAMETER=7/8' OWNED OWNED DYER I i PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW LIGHTING STANDARD & JUNCTI❑N BOX 4-7/8' ` ` P a KaNN• N glig 9 If l[11 • 4 LOAD LINE A L44 �` o o //,•, \wQ�\\\\\��\. DECAL. II NOTES CLASS'B'CONCRETE v.: OTORIZED R WH WHITE LE 2 T]1tN3' k TO BE USED IN o.e. 1 DR VMITE LEGEND CONSTRUCTION OF PAD =fw,l CUTTING RINGS PLAN VIEW anacR"Ea%iND PLAN VIEW FUSE KIT I INDIVIDUAL JUNCTI❑N BOX gam DECAL NUMBERING SYSTEM CLOAD CENTER 4-1/2'X16'AG,BARES 1 TEST SWITCH s' ANCMOt B0.T2 unuTr vwc m "till! i -GL CONDUIT ENTR. A vLNr STREET LIGHTING A e y o,,NV 'p CIBrET EQUBNENT C CONTACTORS 4 �I a 1.PIN TUMBLER-TYPE STAINLESS STEEL BEST CORE LOCK(OR MAL)KEYED FOR \L B CXt EDTH A KEYS �5� I CM R 2.12 GAUGE<MIN.)GALVANIZED SHEET STEEL I NIN I 11^, I I I I PLAN NEW (; 3.NEEDED SEAM CONCEALED TIONHINGES F 1 4.DOOR WITH CONCEALED HINGES(LEFT SIDE) SIZE TO NT CABINET SIZE TO FIT CABINET S.ESINTERIOR-WHITE BAKED-ON ENAMEL FRONT NEW 510E NEW E. .BOTTOM -GRAY-ETCH GALVANIZED SURFACE NW R.'E PAINTING FRONT NEW PLAN NEW 4DF MEN T.4-1/21 OPEM-2'GALVANIZED INGANC FLANGE S W/ND IS AND S ALL SIDES Y B.4-1/2'A6'WLVAR SWIPED ANCHOR BOLTS V/NUTS AND WASHERS CONTRACTOR CABINET CABINET FOUNDATION V.4-1/4'TRIANGULAR SXAPEO CORNER LOCK-DOWN PLATES g U 1 S c I �a gt^iIirf - _ _ I, ju ‘, z I LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE I Z CENTER UNE OF POLE 1— Z P01E LOCAiDN To ARM LENGTH MT.tENOiN LLNMA/RE ■ W CENTER UNE OF STREET Q a-C STA.2400 JS-5 so' JS0' 250 WATTS jj • et, a- �d ='j z xi5 ALL ALUM.80,1 SME LICTN STANOARO,IBTII ISO WAIT O NPT�I500DM VAPOR LUNNNR£!LAMP,JSO"M01/NIDC _i�.. I Ur 2 NSTALL TYPE•B•JUNCTION BOx. . Z w J Z O�E/p STREETLIGHT CONTACTOR CABINET 120/240 VOLT S-- i In p * Y CONDUIT AND WIRING SCHEDULE 14/" —°—°— NEB T RUN N0. CONDUIT WRPG — si OO €,E , , /1/P PVC SCN.IO 2-.11 cK W COPPER `�" 1 minU a ' Q �•1/2• SCN I0 i-Po TbNAaE CROWD •e-c°rr°N.. ''� �� , 7 it `�` VICINITY MAP , F o LEGEND J/IPiI1IIML li , �i Kte F ® TYPE•B•JUNCTION BOX LU/RNATK CBDMO W M10 tii ® VONT CONTACTOR CABINET ' 4191 1111E a XII 111 iib-A 5 1111011t011ll,pW, 1 GRAPHIC SCALE L 10111illisiU4i*Ri EIL--J � rl`-MP �L \\`�a I / o \\k- �F 2)3 - ---N.E. 9TH PLACE z.T•p EX 55 STA Js8801,139'RT. 4N. IN 4 "" EL 284.94 SA:043209 N.E. 9th L. R/V EL IM.90,B1 RIM M E EL.L.:0.40 R 268.89 E NV EL 260.27 F 1 g t $ © CITY OF RENTON �/--:a = ••+i Planning/Building/Public Works Fes" j orA" udri _ 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 AUG 2 6'9 9 jr.4 f 0 3 Q 5 It 2 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 7.204260 U.S. POSTAGE 18 27 99 FC11 PRESORTED SEA I.)A 9 1 722750-046-02 TILLMAN R E 901276 915 F ST REN TJ v W A 9$(.)59 'J0TDE1IVE?ABLE s,; :::-�.-_.__ ! AS ADDR_a"D 01 !UNABLE TO EC?WdRD -J'-1 (14 6 �, ( RET1JRTO SENDER a� Wd an' . . -.z 1; 3 1i i ti :{:' 's , Pow— WNW "Pr inr•-voni 6 CITY OF RENTON _ ---�. .a. © Planning/Building/Public Works W m .� =-4 : • 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 N AU& 2 6'9 9 1 0 3 Q s W * r ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED . PBPI TER 7204260 U.S. POSTAGE 08 27 99 FCM PRESURTED SEA WA 981 722750-0355-32 DICKINSON HERSERT M 269999 X RAINIER MORTGAGE CO r ___ PU 3i1 4 o 'NOT DELIVERABLE .a,:-_::-........ St 98124 AS ADDRESSED Cam, � 9kriblet J ABLE u;CR;lAP3 �--4! nRETURN TO SENDER rwdLaVf- Sr ii { ii.i` tttii i liliiiiiilifilllltlll:rlllslllill,l„l,lllllitl` !S � llilll E: ° 1{iiiliiiil: 11! 1 i cy p CITY OF RENTON F- w.-2 0,7���_ . mil Planning/Building/Public Works 2 4 s��""'�; ; a 1 �� 4y 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 4. W" AU9 2 6'8 9 #_A1 w 0 3 0 5 * .. * ,. ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED PBMETER 7204260 U.S. POSTAGE * 08 27 99 FCM PRESORTED SEA WA 981 v r,D ss 722150-0525-07 +YULLYA _._ ROSS SIM N .e RO55680 98OO7 O40 1998 Ai 08/3O/99 .14680 NE. 35Ti ST I,A 1 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND BOSS eti.. .tVdE WA 904 FERNDALE CIR NE RENTON WA 98056-3027 RETURN TO SENDER SaGAS I/ sa 42. II,IFt11,II1hAduId.diii Id. ,d.I.,.II..dAHH“.I.ItI.It.I.I.II .i wUT Cs re" `90•'MN Q "9 "or.I- ---e^ V r •f'jl ' ♦.,.mf ,C , yol, 4— ; gt. MIWL Mi t-a^ I v UuETegl� � s�• T G < 4 A R 0� TS ;I � � • a v O '7 Y JEMMIE OMITSVvI W y� � r..[ !g 1'tc Fiji n e`O y I 9.e4 a / I+,- .4? 4/ S- NE.-"} .10TH G :... • il R e ® 11A2 ROM..®.::. tlI CANE # 61 10TH ST. s y IOW) 10� I is 4 Laic '',. ilEi MIME ,a,o „ArP4OfLa 'N E.I illt eFt ayMi -.or,- - v -011 Ma 9THRc .g,a iRG i iF i M r- ma. ! T+[112:QwK'wh ETQ",'�W7:I I�I�rl 541/ Hi 03, y 9 H .. .ST,41 i ra sill a Msk I •c:•. la' MI L�� =T . - w 0 0.j.. I tilt i t 4:l E g 1.T i!' 17 17, r1I ��i'fJ t' .w-: r., t�h N PL. s .i i `� '! 1 �i-.. f, = 39TH , " Q4a .2,,Am Hiahlanda r-t ;c* cscsk****tF*****fc*iz;c*fs*'tr',*** * cry C3't>,c�c (c.+;rjc'",c'C�c lotzdge Apt 'z' 'set COMMENTS :Y 99 -109SA-Asat 82305-9047-06 SMITH RICHARD J+CHERI iAGE ?449999 1007 =DMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 042305-9073-03 CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH 647777 1032 EDMONDS AVE NE 03098-001 RENTON WA 98055 082305-9135-09 CALVARY 3APT I ST CHURCH 569999 1032 E0 0NDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 092305-905 7-02 CALVARY ?APTIST CHURCH 7N9999 1032 NE EDMUNDS AVE RENTON WA 94056 092315-9186-06 NELSUN MERLE C c. ,59991 3013 AZALEA CT SE OtYMPIA WA 98501 092305-9207-01 TRINH BAC 44 839499 964 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 092305-9210-06 VASS IVAN L+BEATRICE 899999 960 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0166-01 KENNEDY KAREN A 830783 933 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0170-05 ELDER EDITH C 931731 C/O PURTMANN KAREN 21322 96TH AVE S KENT WA 98031 722750-0215-02 MARTINLZ ROMYAL0.I RUIZ-21699999 919 EOMONOS AVE NE RENTON WA 48056 092305-905;J-0i mATHIESON FLORENCE H 101897 PO BOX 2025 RENTON WA 98056 092305-9059-00 NASS IVAN Li-BEATRICE M 842501 960 EDMONDS AVE N E RENTON WA 98056 092305-9086-07 CALVARY 8APTIST CHURCH 697777 1032 EDMONDS AVE NE 03098-001 RENTON wA 98055 092305-9119-08 PHAM ANh HOANO-MAY VERN 919999 1012 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 092305-9131-02 NELSON MERLE C 859999 3013 AZALEA CT SE OLYMPIA WA 98501 092305-9158-00 JEFFEY .;'-FELEANUR H770054 CLJ1 CJR.TIS iEST REALTY INC 22? QUEEN ANNE AVE N SEATTLE WA 98109 HIGASHI ALAN K 909999 930 EDMONDS AV NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0365-00 HAWKINS KATHLEEN M 329999 926 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0370-03 ANDERSON SEAN U+TROY M 949999 3008 NE 5TH PL RENTON WA 98056 722750-0375-08 SCHUH HARRY 1276 916 EDMONDS NE RENTON WA 98055 722750-0405-02 TILLMAN R E 801276 915 F ST RENTON WA 98055 722750-U410-05 FLOES JUAN C+GUADALUPE J 899999 909 FERNDALE CIRCLE NE RENTON WA 98055 722750-0415-00 MOLZAN NANCY M 809999 4209 SW 329T1 PL FEOERAL WAY WA 99023 722750-0420-03 LAI DAVID 773989 900 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 722150-0220-05 REYNOLDS RAY H 260032 925 EDMONDS AVE NE. RENTON WA 99056 722750-0225-00 REEL IRA I 740625 929 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 9E3056 722750-0230-13 KENNEDY KAREN A 879999 933 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON WA 99056 722750-0355-02 DICKINSON HER3ERT M 269999 I RAINIER MORTGAGE CO 9.0X C-34040 SEATTLE WA 98124 722750-0425-08 PEDERSEN MARY 23999 923 FERNDALE CIRCLE ME RENTON WA 98056 722750-0430-01 STERLINGTON 4( W 500425 PATTON G 2215 NE 10TH PL RENTON WA 98056 722750-0435-06 GRUBESIC M MAXINE+JOHNSON M709999 924 FENUALc CIRCLE NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0440-09 ORFFER CNA Ito-NORMAN L 919999 935 FERNDALE CIR NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0445-04 bRYAN ICHARD A d69999 939 FERNDALE CIR NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0475-07 REINICK MOLLIE 052844 2511 NE 9TH PL KENTON WA 98056 722750-0480-00 BURCH (WEL J 889999 908 FERNDALE CIR NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0485-05 TIMMONS DARRELL K 679999 912 FERNDALE CIR NE RENTON WA 98056 722750-0490-08 TUCKER CARL M+TUCKERIMITMCE169999 F+VALERIE 916 FERNDALE CIRCLE N.E. RENTON WA 98056 722750-0495-03 HUYNH TOAN 8+CHINH K 779999 920 FERNDALE CT NE PENTON WA 98056 722750-0525-07 ROSS SIMON R+YULIYA 869999 14680 NE 35TH ST tA 102 BELLEVUE WA 98007 722780-1055-07 UNITED STATES 667777 922540-0090- 2 CJEHAri ERIC e2621 955 Ei>10N0li AVE NFL 1201 TUN 98056 Return Address: 1111111111811111111111 City Clerk's Office JgJtflff! tii 1055 South Grady Way 12C17001 OF 004 11.00 �� Renton WA 98055 KING COUNTY14gA4 Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT _Property Tax Parcel Number: 092305-9113 &9109 Project File#:C 990096 Street Intersection or Project Name:NE 9T"STREET & EDMONDS AVE NE Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Gerald L. Rieker 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. Soung H. Rieker cn , The Grantor,as named above,for or and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to cs..4 the above named Grantee,the following described property: Additional legal is on Page 4 of document. o (Abbreviated legal description MUST go here). a THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF -y THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M., IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW: 0 o `" A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH OVER AND ACROSS THE WEST 20 FEET OF THE EAST 35 FEET OF THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 01°13'50"WEST 180.67 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SADI SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'10"WEST 85.88 FEET TO INTERSECTION OF A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 75 FEET EAST MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 180.67 FEET; THENCE EAST 86.08 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDING OA H. To .s NO. 8005270551. G OJ of wA 4,,,, Aiirip , ,i,et 0\ ' .fit (i ` ! -d'—.') "' EXPIRES 6/22I 03 That said Grantor(s),for and in consideration of mutual benefits,do by these presents, grant,bargain, sell, convey, and warrants unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (including water,wastewater,and surface water)with necessary appurtenances over,under,through,across and upon the following described property(the right-of-way)in King County,Washington, more particularly described on page 1. (or if full legal is not on page 1—Exhibit A.) For the purpose of constructing, reconstructing,installing,repairing, replacing, enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement,restore the surface of the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such nsP does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or U' c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to ` the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. cv d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the G compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, N successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. By this conveyance, Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and cn every person or persons,whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the c heirs,executors,administrators and assigns forever. IN WITNES WHEREO ,sad Gr has aused this instrument to be executed this=el day of 0U% .l-9"-2 / __...--,___---- -le; 171--)Aa<- '42 INDIVIDUAL FORM OFACKNOWLEDGME Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS ,,,,,,,,u.,,, COUNTY OF KING / �..`Q p\ H YRUA•., I certify that I knoor have satisfactory evidence that C j e rd t a, a, e c,oMM E*A.. •,% S 0 L tZ Kl�-1 ° signed this instrument and ,O T A R y : acknowledge rt to ' er eJ ee and voluntary act for the uses and purposes * : •-rim * mentioned in the instrum t t I.cp: AUBL1G 'tea -,,.... c•.••V a.•2 .0 • ,,�4 Notary Public in for tateto -�o ,,,'0ou,AS�'.'`'' Notary(Print)) 4T f-Faypi/i My appointment expires: /7 `J"I -� .----- Dated: 0 . _-() H:\FORMS\KCRECORD\EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 2 INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) ,,,,,...u..,.,,, ,,,�Q P� N 0 YRA,��, I that I know or have satisfactory evidence that j �• ..•GOON EkA'•, signed this instrument and ? • O T A R y acknowledged it to; hi it ee and voluntary act for the uses and purposes * : . ; * F. mentioned in the" t PUBL\G •:2� ' �, • �'•,,�,9Tc. •Y a.?AC"04o' Notary Public in for a to of ason m *��''•.•.,.'MOW'0 Notary(Print) I T C)`-J JR L My appointment expires: -3, t } (> Dated: D �D J C7 REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) o I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING • On this day of , 19 ,before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: H:\FORMS\KCRECORD\EASEMENT.DOC\ Page 3 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 Map Exhibit S 89 58'10" W (DEED) 85.88' (DEED) S 88 51 59" E 86.02' cr.), CD LLJ { I C7 p a O NZ O �O cr) (r) j Z c� O Z U_U- o� Z J I W Z 35 20 4-1 / � 3I0 N 88 51'59" W 86.45' \ - 9TH LACL M N H:\FORMS\KCRECORD\EASEMENT.DOC\ Pagel{. FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 Return Address: City Clerk's Office Ell'II II 1111 III In lin City of Renton South Grady Way J (I(Iq /ff/ //II/ihiIw/Ivuiiiiiii#002187 Renton, on,WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON BS PAGE 001 OF 002 9.00 12/17/2001 14:14 KING COUNTY, WA BILL OF SALE 1414--1 Ip 7 Property Tax Parcel Number:O 923e6-Q/I5,gld9 Project File#:e 9 9,069 , Streete tees tiog:L%„�,//1aWa Address: —iv i q� PI• Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): i. ?era/d L . �ieiP--- 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. Sce/ Ze/r'e° The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to r1 the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property: crc WATER SYSTEM: Length Size Type 304 L.F.of I 1D. I. Water Main i=.s 5S L.F.of Cp " 'D. I - Water Main L.F.of 51 Water Main _ 2., each of t O " Gate Valves . [p each of Co " Gate Valves 3 each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies o SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Size Type o L.F.of Sewer Main cv L.F.of Sewer Main L.F.of 51 Sewer Main each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length Size Type Llz/7 L.F.of /2 " c.PGP Storm Line L.F.of " Storm Line L.F.of Storm Line each of " Storm Inlet/Outlet .4- each of S fd Storm Catch Basin each of Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk /6.2 L.F. Asphalt Pavement: 9 YCo SY or L.F.of Width STREET LIGHTING: #of Poles By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. 4 f, (_ c cz-d o h 11:\FILE.SYSUFRM\841INDOUT\BILLSALE.DOC\MAB Page 1 • Form 84 0001/bh IN WITNESS WHEREO I ha hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. ,....- 1,Z-e""-"f INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal' • ` `> hbp. STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss ,•`Q P� &A ••, COUNTY OF KING ) `� :c,OMM. E pA•,. •••+ •I certiffy++that •I know or have sati •ctocy evidence that r1a T A R Y • C9t.)}�.--C ' signed this instrument and * : • : * E acknowledged it t• .- W4 er/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes • PU B L\C' mentioned in the .4 °��WAS\;,..... Notary Public in a forte t to o ashi on Notary(Print) ( isrrt e_ k u My appointment expires: '').(--/t£ S Dated: 1 p , q —0 / REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) ec �LC�t.yLU m ••••�������r� I certiff hat I or have satisfactory evidence that d_ .- '�%.Q................ � H 0 Yq�A,��, 4_.2�t� signed this instrument,on oath o '.•` . ootA •E,pA.• •.• stated that h h they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and c, NOTARY • rr. acknowledg • and of ilk to be the free and voluntary act of such * : Ilw• : * = party/parties for ti- uses and p,rp• es mentioned in the instrument. a-- / cv �N'. I'UBLti0 .•_: Jr v •'•• (4s ••OF WAS•••\•\.•' Notary Public in a •r e S ./ of W hi ton '.•...I L.••• , ''• ••`� Notary(Print) 4 1 L k L ccv� My appointment expires: • 0 Dated: I D ` _e/ CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 19 ,before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Page 2 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 24, 2003 TO: City Clerk's Office FROM: Holly SUBJECT: Land Use File Close-Out Please complete the following information to facilitate project close-out and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Cambridge Apartments i LUA(File) Number: LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF 0 i i Cross References: AKA's: The Cambridge Apartments 0 Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Acceptance Date: August 3, 1999 0 E i Applicant:. Gerald Rieker Owner: Gerald Rieker • Contact: Frank Heffernan PID #: 092305-9113-04 i 0 * 092305-9109-00 ERC pproval Denial (circle one) & Date: September 21, 1999 0 ERC A a Date: October 11, 1999 e 0 Administrative Approval: • Public Hearing Date: N/A • i Appeal Period Ends: 0 Date Appealed to HE & By Whom: N/A 0 HEX Decision & Date: Date Appealed to Council & By Whom: N/A i Council Decision & Date: N/A Mylar Recording #: i Project Description: 12 UNIT APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT ON .6 ACRE SITE 26,156 SQ FT SITE ZONED RM-C. 21 STALLS OF PARKNG3 STORY(35 FEET) HEIGHT. THERE WILL BE TREE REMOVAL. ESTIMATED • 0 • COST OF PROJECT$750,000 0 • Location: 2520 NE 9th Place $ Comments: i • i i i0 Setup FERRARI DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTS, PS D 33 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING A x CITY OF RENTON m n MAR 13 2000 Mr. Gerald Rieker RECEIVED March 9, 2001 Z 11017 1015t Place NE x Kirkland, Washington 98033 m Pe 33 n RE: Stop Work Request x All Projects m m m z a z Dear Jerry, This letter acknowledges your request of March 8, 2001 that Ferrari Design Group cease all work on all projects we are currently engaged in on your behalf. We will comply with your direction to cease work and will notify the City of Renton that our firm no longer represents Cambridge Homes Northwest, R & R Land, Jeff Rieker or Gerald Rieker in the capacity of contact person or Architect of Record on the Aberdeen Avenue Apartments, Cambridge Apartments, 333 Union Avenue Site or any other project currently active in the City of Renton. Sincerely, F RRARI DESIG GROUP, P.S. Frank Heffernan, AIA Architect 01 N C7 N co tri V x Q LL co co cn co cc: Elizabeth Higgins City of Renton Planning Division N Lesley Nishihira City of Renton Planning Division co Craig Burnell City of Renton Building Division N V W z o 9912014.doGfh a IIII12277 134TH CT. N.E., SUITE 203, REDMOND, WA 98052-2433 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 21, 2001 Frank Heffernan,AIA Ferrari Design Group 1277 134th Court NE, Suite 203 Redmond,WA 98052 Subject: Request for Minor Modification to Approved Site Plan for Cambridge Apartments/File No. LUA99-109, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Heffernan: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revision to the Cambridge Apartments site plan. The site plan was initially approved on September 21, 1999. The approved site plan included a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building to be located in the Residential Multi-family—Suburban Center(RM-C)zoning designation. The approved project included carport parking (2 individual structures)for 21 vehicles on-site. The proposed modification would modify the approved site plan by eliminating one of the two carport structures. As proposed, the revised plan would provide covered parking for 12 stalls along the eastern property line and 10 uncovered stalls adjacent to the building. This revision would result in an increased total of 22 parking stalls for the site. The Site Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as changes which do not involve more than a 10% increase in area or scale of the development, do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities, and do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC §4-9-200.H). However,the development standards of the RM-C zone specifically require all parking to be provided either underground or within structures (section 4-2-110.F). The only exception to this provision is if it is determined that covered parking should not be allowed due to environmental or physical site constraints. There do not appear to be environmental or physical site constraints applicable to the subject site. Therefore, the proposed modification to the approved site plan is not approved. This decision to deny the proposed modification is subject to a fourteen (14)day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, March 7, 2001. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Lesley Nishihira at(425)430-7270. Sincerely, ke4 U1- 4( Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: Yellow File 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 CIr7 Thte nonnr rnnfotnc cnM_rnrvriAri rn twnrl 'J()%rufct rnnC.lmwr FERRARI DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTS, PS Ms. Lesley Nishihira February 6, 2001 Project Manager -71 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Renton, Washington 98055 Z Z RE: Cambridge Apartments Project Number LUA-99-109 a. Request for Administrative Modification FDG Project No.: 99121.00 Z Dear Ms. Nishihira, 33 This letter and attachments are provided for your review pursuant to a request for an Administrative Modification to the approved Site Plan for the referenced project. The owner, Mr. Gerald Rieker, is proposing to reduce the number of covered parking stalls on site from a total of 21 approved as a part of the initial Site Plan Approval process to a new total of 12 stalls under a covered parking structure as shown on the revised Site Plan. The revised Site Plan (dated February 6, 2001 and noted as revision 2) shows a total of 22 on site parking stalls with 10 surface parking stalls and 12 stalls under cover. We have provided a total of six copies of the revised Site Plan for your use in reviewing the proposed modification. Please contact me in the event there are any questions related to this request or should additional documentation be necessary. Sincerely, FERRARI DESIGN GROUP, PS Frank Heffernan, AIA Architect CITY OF RENTON RECE'WD FEB 0 6 ?nol Attachments a BUtLDINu ul v'SION N cc: Jerry Rieker Cambridge Homes NW co 03 co co N co a 9912111.doc/fh w z 0 x a 12277 134TH CT. N.E., SUITE 203, REDMOND, WA 98052-2433 (-AN oiLoc T R .a ED 19991105000357 N O V 0 5 1999 PAGE 001 OF 004 11/05/1999 09:52 KING COUNTY, WA BUILDING DIVISION R & R LAND INC COV 11.00 RECORDING REQUESTED BY COPY OF AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: RECORDED DOCUMENT King County Recorder's Office City of Renton - -T City Clerk's Office 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT GRANTOR: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee Rieker LEGAL A k rev tet1ecl P-1-v\ o C- 5 e` 9 The complete legal description is on DESCRIPTION: 1—u Z 3 A 5 Exhibit A ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NO.'S: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 THIS RESTRICTIVE COVENANT is dated this 3 day of November 1999, and is made by Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker. 1. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker are the owners of the real property ("Property") in King County, Washington, legally described on the attached Exhibit A and generally depicted on the drawing attached as Exhibit B. 2. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker hereby declare and covenant that the two parcels that comprise the Property shall not be separately assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in any manner. The Property may only be assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in its entirety as a single piece of realty. 3. This Covenant is made pursuant to requirements of the City of Renton as a condition to the issuance of building permits in connection with a multi-family apartment development known as "Cambridge Apartments". This Covenant may not be amended or terminated except with the written approval of the City of Renton. 4. This Covenant shall be terminated upon the recording of a lot line adjustment approved by the City of Renton. 5. This Covenant runs with the land and is binding upon all owners of the Property. DATED the year and day first above written. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker BY. BY: c �J STATE OF W SHINGTON ss. County of ) I certify that I now or have satisfactory evidence that CIA( -s-the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/ a signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED THIS 314 DAY OF _Q,l-u 199 010311"Rte Notary ublic in a d for the State of Washington 1 Name (print d) '� O U- residing at f FH1373/III My appointment expires: `7• 19991105000357 PAGE 002 OF 004 11/05/1999 09:52 KING COUNTY, WA R & R LAND INC COV 11 .00 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST 75 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH 190 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDED, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8005270551. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 0°13'50" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 180.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'10" WEST 85.88 FEET TO INTERSECT A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 75 FEET EAST MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 180.67 FEET; THENCE EAST 86.08 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 10 FEET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8005270551. 1111111111111111 19991105000357 PAGE 003 OF 004 11/05/1999 09:52 KING COUNTY, WA R $ R LANC INC COV 11 .00 EXHIBIT B • NO2. !M•!I•!R•E 6, _— Yy _ - --— — 9--- — �f 9 p?$ ca•ILRETE WO j i Il\- RCM YARD M-RCP LIVL. II•R• ,E,..0. 4 1 SETBACK LIME� pRµ•I� . • g �.. TlOT S M•5174•C •• - I. • U)e•COTTONWOOD!Ntl PROVIDE YR IITO ■ I To eE RvED 6'a%w' PEMLe AMD BATE I GQC' AT REAM PAD I =I I • SIN.TO 1/909. MAR YARD .O'r• '' I9'-0+!lTOALK LlT-1' Y-A- •.'- •LrI! / 4 �� / r V 'Fri(• Ir yy I ///T[ ' Y A 1 L A tOLRERY) ROLRCRY T4 / • • I a 7 /- ♦ \ •! - I I� / CIVIL RAM!J •' y J !C ALGA Me .�+ � �—. • 6I I I TO■E R■tlVm 11 \ IR JNIi • !> P. IIME a(..AITPORT..COP Ai ' CONCA T!PATIOS AT •I I 1G . ~\ ' LOFIR'LOOR 14114e. — . , , - J. 1 a. \ all -{ 41 ; ; ■ ���T— 61 • • • '.MIT I _ NrM ( I y ill" Yp I���T A 1 I -MOE PAINTED > . n i• .7. k ItAle[Iltl!TI[IPPIMe • } f [ \ u ' 8i _ ,' 5 I ) \ I $ l 6 p l PR 10EP s ePs --f 6 1 ;; g 1 i !1 • .j I i PER slTc cN oD TiG* I a t, I I NANoic.AP PARRIw FleP/i !-ALE. I e� I, WIT DE Sie•ueE AND 1 ' PAVE.lM MARRiNe!PER .-, LITT REOVIRE,NENTS. !/ - TOTAL OP 2 f I A \ ITV Lwe or ulRn / i r •I• L• "•' 4* ` I I ROd• C ��RR. ..J—F I, eirmor*.emorse/ ' r—A 1 VI 'I I -+' I. I • •, I 1 o I PROPOEm TAW.? ` I I i Ira I MLTe Dewr 1 _� . { ralee lery ear TREE 1IN 20.0•lR**LR LN/----i ___ f-- /�1-�..C/r- r r / 6'a NwN MOD PROIR YARD I C■ wILCOxC! GOK.RCTC GIA�'\ PEMLC WARA `n�PA DETAIL /-TYPICAL•REA `�I POST!-SEC Q II�� 2/905 CCC LNL ORAN1tle DOTAL 47DS n I - /` T6.ALDER TIME -\ I M --._*7 O eC RCrP/CD I)e 1 w•..' , '�� L16MT ODLLARD GIHTI VTLITY �ON P11pTOGlLL • El • 2O•r 26'4 2A-a 4 9 IN LRA NIRe — I. New LOMLRrt SIDe4MLR PREVIQA IO'-O'DEpLATION AND LLRuOY/RER TO TO LITY OP RENTON PLY-C,4006,5 -CITY IMP..OP LI REMON lTANDARD! 40.600l2TOY)I REME DR Awuel. N.E. 9TH PLACE _ ___ _ _ (a 40'0•ROM) — ERISTIN,*LWpNAIRE Q A•O POPRR POLE R 4. SITE PLAN .... Mo xxE N 19991105000357 111111111111 PAGE 004 OF 004 11/05/1999 09:52 KING COUNTY, WA R & R LAND INC COV 11.00 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 2, 1999 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Sonja J. Fesser>i SUBJECT: Restrictive Covenant Document for Cambridge Apartments LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced legal description submittal and find that said legal is satisfactory as presented,except for the exclusion of"City of Renton." See the attachment. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\U:\SFESSER\CAMBRDG2.DOC EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST 75 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH 190 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN ING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDED(UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8005270551. PARCEL B. C O THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, __INAKING COMFY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30y EET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 0°13' 50" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 180.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'10" WEST 85.88 FEET TO INTERSECT A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 75 FEET EAST MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 180.67 FEET; THENCE EAST 86.08 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 10 FEET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8005270551. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: October 27, 1999 TO: Sonja Fesser, Property Services FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning SUBJECT: Restrictive Covenant for Cambridge Apartments Project File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF Attached is a revised copy of the draft restrictive covenant, which includes the corrected legal descriptions. Please review the document for the appropriate legal descriptions and return comments to me at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please contact me at 430-7270. Thank you. • S DRAFT RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Renton City Clerk's Office 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT GRANTOR: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee Rieker LEGAL The complete legal description is on DESCRIPTION: Exhibit A ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NO.'S: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 THIS RESTRICTIVE COVENANT is dated this day of November 1999, and is made by Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker. 1. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker are the owners of the real property ("Property') in King County, Washington, legally described on the attached Exhibit A and generally depicted on the drawing attached as Exhibit B. 2. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker hereby declare and covenant that the two parcels that comprise the Property shall not be separately assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in any manner. The Property may only be assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in its entirety as a single piece of realty. 3. This Covenant is made pursuant to requirements of the City of Renton as a condition to the issuance of building permits in connection with a multi-family apartment development known as "Cambridge Apartments". This Covenant may not be amended or terminated except with the written approval of the City of Renton. 4. This Covenant shall be terminated upon the recording of a lot line adjustment approved by the City of Renton. S 5. This Covenant runs with the land and is binding upon all owners of the Property. DATED the year and day first above written. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker BY: BY: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of I certify that I now or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1999. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Name (printed): residing at FH1373/III My appointment expires: EXHIBIT A 1. JOB ADDRESS: 2520 N.E. 9th Place Renton, Washington 2. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee 11017 - 101st Place N.E. Kirkland, WA 98033 Phone: (206)300-5911 Fax: (425)828-2608 3. KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 109 AND 113. LOT 113 - PARCEL #092305-9113-04 S-T-R 09-23-05 LOT 9113 OF NW 1/4 BEG 30 FT N OF SE ALG E LN OF SD SUBD 180.67 FT TH PLW & 75 FT E MEAS AT R/A FR W SD PLL LN 180.67 FT TH E 86.08 POR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 COR OF SD SUBD TH N 00-13-50 W S 89-58-10 W 85.88 FT TO NXN LN LN OF E 1/2 OF SD SUBD TH S ALG FT M/L TO POB LESS ST. LOT 109 - PARCEL #092305-9109-00 S-T-R 09-23-05 LOT 9109 OF E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF W 75 FT OF N 160FTOFS 190FTSW 1/4OFNW 1/4 LESS ST. FH 1373/III , s • EXHIBIT B NO2' S S!•A'S. e— R19 S s V REAR YARDGOI,GReTe OAS `r o••O"SeTeACK LIN!—� ,,, 6wIL. TS .._.,• 2/•-0. .E-Ri Or 5!!•515.•a a . } I I'LOTTON.Y'O0! • .se.es SCRE9.CD e Re.+OveD ENCE•ND SAM - TO ee RL.PAE PAD REAR+ARD !IM O IM5 ' •O'-.. S-O SETSAGK LI ST-0• 1 I S-.•=-!'- t I • III ill 1 1 R \ t RxKee+ ROC PER clvIL fwKs !t '1 './ • I J I W.To Se DeRe`C,ED 2I A UNIT I •,I LIIe a cARroRT ROOF ? I OveRNANS.M c NIERETE PATIOS AT Ie LOPlR FLOOR WITS i 2 I O �r J-\ qs NI i M 1'0Al2'-O i , •.••(N II !D!M "r/ a / L �• !1 • 3 I u...... I to 0Nr I 4 # 1 ' Y i� Y l at • fa II •i2 I py !, 3 I T' ♦ Ill 8 t, 4 •I Y f •r ••ND!PAINTED I 71 • "i r7 AtAR1DN5 STRIP•INe 4 8 = i e ` = 1 a 11 � $ o 3. o 6 5 I(d 8 -I S a • i • 1 PRavlpe sTePs ,,,.........—• il R • • PE[WE c0•caIONs I .I'n - IWT l PAT.ve'...E RE PROVIDE ESS AR SR I t, i J TOTAL OP eil I L Ne OP WIT! .7— K 1 I I. il NI�.. y •,.... - 1 1T .11 \' I .1 ? Itell 'x�Ee RIx I e r{I I I• ��F ;s 1 too !1 OAT I C . Cl4 I� 1 • 1 10 -.• _F 1 I ii I .111 • ' T S• I Iy ' I al50•PIR TRW L. -------- -'Z, . ♦ - ToxReMoveO 20'-0"S'!/.CAL Lite yY- PING!W ' PIIONT TARO I 3OOXE` __ BETE We POSTS-See Q I GAL-Re. DETAIL I�pS� I • CIVIL DRAMIN55 "I. r R` i5�,,, f i . Iew• ' n TO Se ReR TeeE 0 La.'BOLLARD UTILIT ear ONP"O' LL __—___555' 5!IS•51'5."E I • ® GAL �Ner.`...NA.ae •L-0�7 • 20•-.• 25.0 2.'-O• Q l sR — • HEN CONCRETE SIDExALK AND c:Re.'OUTTE[TO ALI,ND OP Rea,.STANDARD! G:Dts'O'-O'.eS.CATION -- _.—:Re.G :RA,..N55 N.E. OITH PLACE to cm•2,055 •[eNTGr ecOROINS b eKIsTINS wIN e•. A AND Pete.•O.e SITE PLAN SCALE. No SCALE N t,I ,:} CITY _ F RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 25, 1999 Mr. Frank Heffernan, AIA Ferrari Design Group P.S. 12277— 134 h Court NE, #203 Redmond,WA 98052 SUBJECT: Cambridge Apartments Project Number LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Heffernan: Thank you for submitting a draft of the restrictive covenants required as a condition of approval for the above referenced project. The City Attorney has approved the legal format of the document. However, the Property Services section has found problems with the legal descriptions included with the document. Specifically, the legal descriptions for both Tax Lot No. 092305-9113 and Tax Lot No. 092305- 9109 do not follow any logical order and therefore, do not make sense. Portions of these legal descriptions appear to have been removed from one part of said legals and then inserted in other parts, making the legals meaningless. In addition, the abbreviated format used in the writing of these legal descriptions is not helpful in the reading or understanding of them. Please revise the restrictive covenant document to include the appropriate legal descriptions and submit them to me at your earliest convenience. Once received, the revised draft will be routed to Property Services for their final approval. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425)430-7270. Sincerely, Zte(14-1 f)71 Lesley Nishih. a Project Manager C: Gerald & Soung Hee Rieker, Property Owners 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 C., This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 22, 1999 TO: Lesley Nishihira FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Restrictive Covenant for Cambridge Apartments Legal Description Review I have reviewed the above referenced submittal and find that the legal descriptions included in said covenant document are not satisfactory. Specifically,the legal descriptions for both Tax Lot No. 092305-9113 and Tax Lot No. 092305-9109 do not follow any logical order and therefore, do not make sense. Portions of these legal descriptions appear to have been removed from one part of said legals and then inserted in other parts,making the legals meaningless. Also,the very abbreviated format used in the writing of these legal descriptions is not helpful in the reading or understanding of them. \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\\\TS_SERVER\SYS2\USR\SFESSER\CAMBRIDG.DOC CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: October 18, 1999 RECEIVED TO: Sonja Fesser, Property Services OCT 19 1999 FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning CITY OF RENTON UTILITY SYSTEMS SUBJECT: Restrictive Covenant for Cambridge Apartments Project File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF As a condition of approval for the above referenced project, the applicant was required to prepare a draft restrictive covenant for our approval (see condition #1 attached). A copy of the applicant's draft restrictive covenant is attached. Please review the document for the appropriate legal descriptions and return comments to me at your earliest convenience. A copy of the document has also been forwarded to the City Attorney for review of the format and language. If you have any questions, please contact me at 430-7270. Thank you. DEVELOPIL1L: PLANNING CITY OF RENTON O C T ;. 1999 RECEIVED RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Renton City Clerk's Office 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT GRANTOR: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee Rieker LEGAL The complete legal description is on DESCRIPTION: Exhibit A ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NO.'S: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 THIS RESTRICTIVE COVENANT is dated this day of November 1999, and is made by Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker. 1. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker are the owners of the real property ("Property') in King County, Washington, legally described on the attached Exhibit A and generally depicted on the drawing attached as Exhibit B. 2. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker hereby declare and covenant that the two parcels that comprise the Property shall not be separately assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in any manner. The Property may only be assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in its entirety as a single piece of realty. 3. This Covenant is made pursuant to requirements of the City of Renton as a condition to the issuance of building permits in connection with a multi-family apartment development known as "Cambridge Apartments". This Covenant may not be amended or terminated except with the written approval of the City of Renton. 4. This Covenant shall be terminated upon the recording of a lot line adjustment approved by the City of Renton. 5. This Covenant runs with the land and is binding upon all owners of the Property. DATED the year and day first above written. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker BY: BY: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of I certify that I now or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1999. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Name (printed): residing at FH1373/III My appointment expires: EXHIBIT A 1. JOB ADDRESS: 2520 N.E. 9th Place Renton, Washington 2. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee 11017 - 101st Place N.E. Kirkland, WA 98033 Phone: (206)300-5911 Fax: (425)828-2608 3. KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 109 AND 113. LOT 113 - PARCEL #092305-9113-04 S-T-R 09-23-05 LOT 9113 OF NW 1/4 BEG 30 FT N OF SE ALG E LN OF SD SUBD 180.67 FT TH PLW & 75 FT E MEAS AT R/A FR W SD PLL LN 180.67 FT TH E 86.08 POR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 COR OF SD SUBD TH N 00-13-50 W S 89-58-10 W 85.88 FT TO NXN LN LN OF E 1/2 OF SD SUBD TH S ALG FT M/L TO POB LESS ST. LOT 109 - PARCEL #092305-9109-00 S-T-R 09-23-05 LOT 9109 OF E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF W 75 FT OF N 160 FT OF S 190 FT SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS ST. FH 1373/III • EXHIBIT B I = ;i CONCRETE CLR6 a Y!rJ REAR YARD xP.REP.GIV IL • I r IV-0-SETBACK LINe� 18 oRAAUNe! T.J •GOxONNDOps PROVIDE SLREEKD :IIO Y RCNKNED • I • PENCE AND BATE - AT R14J51 PAD REAR YARD • !IM O I/Sp! r.O-.•— S'-0♦xTBALK Li ST•-D• ID'-.•.._ I 4 �/ R • 1 Q Y t • ROCKER i ROGKEFT PER • 1 0 v _ \\ �•/� CIVIL I I I >D•ALDER AEC �]I 11 1 O Be RE`IOVED f I 7.1 i VAT • • 1' _ I r LING OP LASSO!?COOP 1' . OVERMANS.re I CONCRETE PATIOS AT 41 LLONIYM!R PLOOR LN1S. •Il 2 1 O 20 I • !-D-x12'.O - •rI i 1 !p�M T/'"') e. C I.. 1..) .....—. 41 •1 . 3 1, tau -.. pf' aa al uuT I 4• 111 i—r N i I • I y ii N s I •g T• I. 171 O III• s t 11 4'M MOB PAINTED '^ n !� t i 5�•IARKINI lTRIPPIN6 9 a ddy S I a ./ d; • ' y 5 1 > 18 A I s $ • i •4 PROVIDE sTCPe • — MI F Pee oI lire cO. TIONs I n •1 - UNIT I HANDICAP PARK NO!-AL. ly CA o PROVIDE S16NADE AND I. 7.2 I /T Io L iµ aJ�3RE-!vi13 K • Illi LYt OP LN» / / L( I I !�\\�\r 4^ I� 1. RISEIr IM I ,• 11 III yr i O 9 1: .41 t tat �O PROPOSED ASONANKT BT•-e• I'-0• ew.c+.eee D.uve.Y.Y II �- I w 1 I ,I � Eo•FIR Aee b'-0'w6M HOOD 20-0-SETBACK LINE ' - — - -�I ♦ -40 NI 'o ee a"O•/cD PeN:E W.K. FRONT TARO I • k !1 vAILB01I!N - P/ Pos»-SEE 4 s _f 2iSDDCtAIL CONCRETE-REP oer..L VSDS il I • CIVIL ORAMN6S I 4 n "" 2.•AL7eR ieE_ I. i lKISt.Nb 1 I'-K :'•O� ID'.P• µ .I` *O SE C•`•OVE� _ !Mot'NriLlre LyµT BOLLARD i. ux+•eNT • �oN PNOTOClLL -.�. __ is SS'Sep SI'S..e ® x.NCAI I . • • • —__ __ I •SIPS—•I•!--_�— —, • -- • . • I / F- Q NEn L:Mnu1RE .r.e j —20'-.• 24'-0' 2.'-0• • 9 R NEA CONCRETE SIDDKAL.K AND CLRd6YTTeR TO AND OP RENTON STANDARD! TO A r 3 O-O'DED LATIOv eCP Civil.ORIwIN6S TO L'0x D•*EATON RECORD'v6 -- S —.---.—•—•-----•-----'—'—'—'—•—•—'———N.E._�IT_H PL_AGE No Dccsr.Ds! •—(..0-G'ROAJ —•—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—. .—. .—.- 9 \ !xllilN6_ NAC 0 AND PCYIC PO_! • SITE PLAN !GALE, NO SCA41 N 4`; CITY (_F RENTON ..� Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren DEVELOPMENT PLANNINcaL MEMORANDUM CffY OF RENTON OCT 2 1999 To: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning RECEIVED From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: October 20, 1999 Subject: Restrictive Covenant for Cambridge Apartments Project File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is approved as to legal form. Lawrence J Warren LJW:as. cc: Jay Covington A8:167.17. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker & Soung Hee PROJECT NAME: Cambridge Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2520 NE 9th Place MITIGATION MEASURES: 1) The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated January 27, 1999, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. 2) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee equal to $75 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $354.51 per new multi- family unit. The Parks Mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for the Cambridge Apartments, File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1) After the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney, the applicant shall complete one of the following prior to the issuance of building permits: a) Record a lot line adjustment which eliminates the dividing property line; or, b) Record a restrictive covenant that prohibits the sale of the parcels separately. If the applicant chooses to record a restrictive covenant, language would need to be included which would rescind the covenant in the event a lot line adjustment resulting one parcel were recorded. 2) The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide acceptable screening along the street frontage of the site. The revised plantings should be a minimum width of 15 feet and should be of a sufficient height and spacing to provide an adequate buffer for the residential building and parking area from the adjacent uses. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan in order to provide a complete pedestrian connection from NE 9th Place to the entrances of the building. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. DEVELOPML: i PLANNING CITY OF RENTON OCT 1999 RECEIVED RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Renton City Clerk's Office 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT GRANTOR: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee Rieker LEGAL The complete legal description is on DESCRIPTION: Exhibit A ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NO.'S: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 THIS RESTRICTIVE COVENANT is dated this day of November 1999, and is made by Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker. 1. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker are the owners of the real property ("Property') in King County, Washington, legally described on the attached Exhibit A and generally depicted on the drawing attached as Exhibit B. 2. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker hereby declare and covenant that the two parcels that comprise the Property shall not be separately assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in any manner. The Property may only be assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in its entirety as a single piece of realty. 3. This Covenant is made pursuant to requirements of the City of Renton as a condition to the issuance of building permits in connection with a multi-family apartment development known as "Cambridge Apartments". This Covenant may not be amended or terminated except with the written approval of the City of Renton. 4. This Covenant shall be terminated upon the recording of a lot line adjustment approved by the City of Renton. 5. This Covenant runs with the land and is binding upon all owners of the Property. DATED the year and day first above written. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker BY: BY: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of I certify that I now or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1999. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Name (printed): residing at FH1373/III My appointment expires: EXHIBIT A 1. JOB ADDRESS: 2520 N.E. 9th Place Renton, Washington 2. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee 11017 - 101st Place N.E. Kirkland, WA 98033 Phone: (206)300-5911 Fax: (425)828-2608 3. KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 109 AND 113. LOT 113 - PARCEL #092305-9113-04 S-T-R 09-23-05 LOT 9113 OF NW 1/4 BEG 30 FT N OF SE ALG E LN OF SD SUBD 180.67 FT TH PLW & 75 FT E MEAS AT R/A FR W SD PLL LN 180.67 FT TH E 86.08 POR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 COR OF SD SUBD TH N 00-13-50 W S 89-58-10 W 85.88 FT TO NXN LN LN OF E 1/2 OF SD SUBD TH S ALG FT M/L TO POB LESS ST. LOT 109 - PARCEL #092305-9109-00 S-T-R 09-23-05 LOT 9109 OF E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF W 75 FT OF N 160 FT OF S 190 FT SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS ST. FH 1373/III EXHIBIT B --- 0192' S 00'51'5'I'G----- E Kg . R 0 RCA*YARD GOKRG2 GAO xi-w Glyn. i R-17'%TOKR llJl� DRNWR67 r I (4/0' W GOxO '.00D! ' ` PROMO!SGRC94DII TO OC REMOVED Y-0•K4'D K1•C0 AND SATE Y OCt. •L, IIMRE T R 4 PAD RWl YARD �^• TO I/S IM O SD! 40'-a• S'-0/SETOAGR LI !T-O' ,—.• # tELTGLG I I , 4 R qm .hi RDcxGRY i �/ROGRErf'MR , • /'• GM, I I I 1 117r I SO-ALDER TRee li f TO ee RC•IDJCD 21 Yi I UNIT I I LING OP LARPORT tOOP pIL .111 T I r OVGRNANO.TT GRET!PATIOS AT I 1 11 • LOCCO FLOOR URITS. I •II 2 ! s 1'\ \ • L -J �•.� 3 I ,1 I1out R M .IV`✓ 4 L 44�� i I i T . Ig r, I OW u• 4 -`—r I , ill ,/ -III 11 pW gl I r' ♦ I1' !o i •'a •• AIDE PAINTED I x x t I I 5 4ARKIN6 STRIAINS 4 1 M1 = r = I f 11 o; 4 I m PROVI00 STCry i— I Y !O Q • 1 I • PER Slit cp.DAR! I _ • WT I RANDIGM PARKING S ALL. IC� IR 9. \J PROVIDe SISNAOC AHI7 �-' GTOTµ 01•ReauI]CI.e,s PAVEMEArT l 2t i Al ' LTM•e OF W,S f 14 IR i GAR — K ;v ie . , 4tai II 1 -4j—N, I -IAat i to. I O 9 4 I: i tal • I . NO PR0,05E0 ARR.., i 1I PM '•0' .-0. c0•RRETE DtNEAAY I II II 70♦ R ' I ,1 _0'PM,LE 0'-0'WISH ITDAD FRONT+ARD I .f 0 IR PENLG Waxl lee ICTC3 GOKRGTC GAO M POSTS-SCE ARO;CTAIL TYPICAL-REP • DETAIL NSpl� '�I. P ♦ I • M1 - ChM ORAMINy! j ]a•µOTO'�: exmTNe rw•{N s'•A le'-r To ee te•o.n Llx • 1 • P. WOW BOLLARD I - yTl I • CA ENT �a.Fw.cceLL p •er.LYMNDC a-0� xaw• DI'-0• - 24.0 - • 9/ 1 NCA GORLRCTE VCR...LK NC LIASOUTTEt'0 Glx 0,NIL RCNTOR STANOAROS PtGNOV!'O-0'7S7.LAT101. •t!P G DtAA'NSS N N.E. TO Lax OP RCRTON RGGORD'N6 -- —•—•---.---. •---•—•---—————_._41T_H PL__A_G_E .0 0007TD!! Q (.AO'-0'R0M) —.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—. —.—. A� ro .—.— 0 RP FDYit .2 SITE PLAN N SLALG. RD SGALC N CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: October 18, 1999 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning") SUBJECT: Restrictive Covenant for Cambridge Apartments Project File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF As a condition of approval for the above referenced project, the applicant was required to prepare a draft restrictive covenant for our approval (see condition #1 attached). A copy of the applicant's draft restrictive covenant is attached. Please review the document for the appropriate language and format and return comments to me at your earliest convenience. A copy of the document has also been forwarded to Property Services for review of the legal descriptions. If you have any questions, please contact me at 430-7270. Thank you. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: October 18, 1999 TO: Sonja Fesser, Property Services FROM: Lesley Nishihira, Development/Planning SUBJECT: Restrictive Covenant for Cambridge Apartments Project File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF As a condition of approval for the above referenced project, the applicant was required to prepare a draft restrictive covenant for our approval (see condition #1 attached). A copy of the applicant's draft restrictive covenant is attached. Please review the document for the appropriate legal descriptions and return comments to me at your earliest convenience. A copy of the document has also been forwarded to the City Attorney for review of the format and language. If you have any questions, please contact me at 430-7270. Thank you. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker& Soung Hee PROJECT NAME: Cambridge Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2520 NE 9th Place MITIGATION MEASURES: 1) The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated January 27, 1999, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. 2) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee equal to $75 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $354.51 per new multi- family unit. The Parks Mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for the Cambridge Apartments, File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1) After the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney, the applicant shall complete one of the following prior to the issuance of building permits: a) Record a lot line adjustment which eliminates the dividing property line; or, b) Record a restrictive covenant that prohibits the sale of the parcels separately. If the applicant chooses to record a restrictive covenant, language would need to be included which would rescind the covenant in the event a lot line adjustment resulting one parcel were recorded. 2) The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide acceptable screening along the street frontage of the site. The revised plantings should be a minimum width of 15 feet and should be of a sufficient height and spacing to provide an adequate buffer for the residential building and parking area from the adjacent uses. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan in order to provide a complete pedestrian connection from NE 9th Place to the entrances of the building. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. DEVELOPMa;J PLANNING 'V I", ET CITY OF RENTON tariir OCTA 1999 RECEIVED RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Renton City Clerk's Office 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT GRANTOR: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee Rieker LEGAL The complete legal description is on DESCRIPTION: Exhibit A ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NO.'S: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 THIS RESTRICTIVE COVENANT is dated this day of November 1999, and is made by Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker. 1. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker are the owners of the real property ("Property') in King County, Washington, legally described on the attached Exhibit A and generally depicted on the drawing attached as Exhibit B. 2. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker hereby declare and covenant that the two parcels that comprise the Property shall not be separately assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in any manner. The Property may only be assigned, transferred, encumbered or conveyed in its entirety as a single piece of realty. 3. This Covenant is made pursuant to requirements of the City of Renton as a condition to the issuance of building permits in connection with a multi-family apartment development known as "Cambridge Apartments". This Covenant may not be amended or terminated except with the written approval of the City of Renton. 4. This Covenant shall be terminated upon the recording of a lot line adjustment approved by the City of Renton. 5. This Covenant runs with the land and is binding upon all owners of the Property. DATED the year and day first above written. Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker BY: BY: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of ) I certify that I now or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1999. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Name (printed): residing at FH1373/III My appointment expires: EXHIBIT A 1. JOB ADDRESS: 2520 N.E. 9th Place Renton, Washington 2. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Gerald Rieker/Soung Hee 11017 - 101st Place N.E. Kirkland, WA 98033 Phone: (206)300-5911 Fax: (425)828-2608 3. KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: 092305-9113-04; 092305-9109-00 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 109 AND 113. LOT 113 - PARCEL #092305-9113-04 S-T-R 09-23-05 LOT 9113 OF NW 1/4 BEG 30 FT N OF SE ALG E LN OF SD SUBD 180.67 FT TH PLW & 75 FT E MEAS AT R/A FR W SD PLL LN 180.67 FT TH E 86.08 POR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 COR OF SD SUBD TH N 00-13-50 W S 89-58-10 W 85.88 FT TO NXN LN LN OF E 1/2 OF SD SUBD TH S ALG FT M/L TO POB LESS ST. LOT 109 - PARCEL #092305-9109-00 S-T-R 09-23-05 LOT 9109 OF E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF W 75 FT OF N 160 FT OF S 190 FT SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS ST. FH1373/III EXHIBIT B 0502 S DD'SI E— Z I 'a I g ud 0 Y CONCRETE CURB ,g < a*. REAR YARD xP-REP.CIVIL. ' 8 r� SLO'SETBACK LDS—` W DRANGS • TN)D'COTTONWOODS PROVIDE SCREENED el Q O GE REMOVED i �x Ail-O PENCE AND SATE REFUSE PAD REAR YARD SIM. O I/SOS r b-.— 3'i SETBACK IINE�nb- I ' D'-1• ;-D•A RECYCLE / I Y� YS- / 4 R 1 -to ROCKERY ROCKEIEI PER / • • • m /'. \ rI I CIVL PLANS JJJ� I ' S 50'ALDER TREE I . O EC REMK OD II I ..SIT ' LIK Or CARPORT ROOT e 4 I ovERNwwD.xP i I CONCRETE PATIOS AT I I I_ , DYER FLOOR UNITS. • I I O 2 to Al• ( , ICI el RE ta I • - —+- 4 it UNITI e T 4 § �' ! Y r y 1I R T • lit P ,NI s i S /'el•WIDE PAINTED r Yy f ;' S / 4ARKIu6 STRII•PIN6 4 L O T' 8 1 — ® � 1C// — o ie 8 d ^ I R 10 ti x A' Q p PR�iIDE STEPS 9 ��. '- } • g -I tl, , 4 > PER SITE CONDITIONS - S _- - - UNIT .I - NANDILAP PARKINO S ALL. 5lel PROVIDE SISNADE ANT 1 of . PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER ;.I CITYREDUIREI.ENTS Si TOTAL.OP 2qs LIK OP UNITS4 & al r,,.... < • to r ell 41 • ••I -` 6 I 14 e Rear RISE ® I INI ROOK• ) %- tea.�l WI JI RI o I ~ to V.', O 9 t) i Re T. 5 T_F p •. 10 ��•�ADPNALT I or-0' CONCRETE DRIveWAY I I I - n a �R / I 11 >0•FIR TREE L O'-0'SETDALK LINE --k. \ \ - ODE REIW'YED PENCE DETAIL I POSTS XYWD Q FRONT YARD ®'PER DOTES MAR . OETAIL 1205 \ ,9 I r CML DRAWING! y • �_ n --• TO ALDER TRCC I. \ .1 r lxISTING I'-R'�D'-0' ID'-R• ODE tEMOVED UTILITY • •• LNWT DOLLARD ON PHOTOCELL r EASEMENT , ® TYPICAL -- T59S' SDD'S1yP-C . s ------ •sr STD ----„•--�--T-- \•0• . 7 p New LUMINAIRc .'-0� 20-2 zr-0 O.-0 4 R —' MEN CONCRETE 5,0EWALK \ AND CLRSd6UTTER TO PREVIOUS IO'-o"DEDICATION GT,OP RENTON STANDARDS TO CITY OP*Ewa',RELO oiNG -- \ -----:REP CIVIL DRAMINO5---•—"-----•—•---"-----N_E._ct T_H_PL_AGE No.DOOSTO55, (e M•-0•ROIL) —'—'r" — o AND POvTR rol! • SITE PLAN SCKE, NO SCALE N a y CIT, IF RENTON es& 3 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 15, 1999 Mr. Frank Heffernan,AIA Ferrari Design Group P.S. 12277— 134 h Court NE, #203 Redmond,WA 98052 SUBJECT: Cambridge Apartments Project Number LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF • Dear Mr. Heffernan: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, 2( d(-- Z7-3- ---) Lesley Nishih a Project Manager cc: Mr. Gerald Rieker/Owner Ms. Molly Reinick, Ms. Florence Mathieson FINAL 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 ca_. • . . I ,Y FERRARI DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTS, PS D Mr. Craig Burnell October 12, 1999 Building Plan Reviewer m City of Renton w WEN ON. 1055 South Grady Way +~� t. ..,,;;;:i)!:"; . Renton WA 98055 Z { OCT 1 5 1999 y RE: CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS I PERMIT NO. B99-0128 C.1.R.DIN3 [;•;VISION _ LUA-99-109, SA-A; ECF T FDG PROJECT NO. 99121 .00 Z m m m Dear Mr. Burnell: z We are in receipt of your latest review comments faxed to our office by Jan Conklin on September 29, 1999. Please review our responses to these comments as follows: Fire Prevention Comments: 1 ,2,3. It is our understanding that Touma Engineering is revising the civil plans for the project and providing a resubmittal directly to the Public Works and Fire Divisions. Planning Comments: NI 1 . The Site Plan (Drawings SD-1 ) and the Landscape Plan have been revised as follows in response to conditions of Site Plan Approval: • 1 5' visual buffer at street frontage is shown. • Landscaping area on east property has been modified to indicate a rockery and paving in lieu of a 5'-0" landscaped area. • .The Douglas Fir which was in conflict with the fire hydrant location has been repositioned on the Landscape Plan. co • A draft of a restrictive covenant (related to the two parcels upon which the project will be developed) is submitted as an attachment co N to this letter for review by the City Attorney. co iri • A pedestrian connection from N.E. 9th Place is shown on the Landscape Plan (L-1 ) and the Site Plan (SD-1 ). x Q u_ co co CO CO N CO vi N W Z O a 12277 134TH CT. N.E., SUITE 203, REDMOND, WA 98052-2433 r= .,-�. � .-- _ - ,__.� - •.�g-.mac _. _ . CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2-3ca day of ok , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing 2--e-pck 3 \�ectSt Y` documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Rke a-- So w tte �irar\k. tFe('(eAma fewu,e IMotlk1 IRellnn�cl� Ttoreance- 3. CV'&*tr teat-t \ (Signature of Sender) 50, STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that, � _ S �` signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for theses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: J'71- 30 /e't Notary Public i nd for the State of Was ir'gton MARLL v KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Print) IYN �aMGHt,-F My appointmergnzwalEN EXPIRES:6-29.03 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES J 23, 209g Project Number: Lc A 9 10cil S 1ot _ ` ( NOTARY.DOC City of Fcenion REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: September 21, 1999 Project Name: Cambridge Apartments Applicant/Owner: Gerald Rieker& Soung Hee Contact: Frank Heffernan, AIA File Number. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. Project Location: 2520 NE 9th Place Exist. Bldg. Area: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area: 11,964 gsf Site Area: 26,156 sf Total Building Area: 11,694 gsf UTE"W 90. `: . : :"? 'i�` ' "y ri `+44' ‘e.., ..47.E pi m UNISET�iFl�$-' - 4. ��c+•' yi Y 'YHTS 1 'U �r ,:,a`7 ° .4 Fri -` '-@:Or i y r k tl ' '�� .'Z NIk JEhxiE UMAIrS s� 111 y'9 eri CIZj 6' 1 tr---1 's, "t\',a.r.k.Nii, 0 1,14' 5 HE.- I0 - .u �� il.k N J d ® •� rn �� <A iorH sr. 1 in * �l,6 �S G g ii131113111 O g �!% rF,o-O• Fi 2, w wL M. W fy - . i� T. 01.5,16%,PM fill 9TH + flat 1,, VOL Twit- '04,41:44t 21%:: I ' F-142a 2*V.- ' Ni81.4nts:441"1" ritraee 9TH •• I .��, Hil if l'zL:-i 7::: .it s1" 1�ti �J J I �11 1:1 n r., ` ai � ■ 2 L` J. i .' bPL. le. . 7: e > >9TN 4�: 3 5.01 m I il. : .''tsza pa "II ( 4ihIonds pi- . Park �i'-� , Project Location Map siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr i/Review Committee Staff Report CAML RIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF ' REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 2 of 12 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicants are requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval for the construction of a multi-family apartment building located in the Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center (RM-C) zone. The project would result in the development of one 3-story building containing 12 two-bedroom units. Access to the site would be provided by one driveway directly off NE 9th Place. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, which would be located on the east side of the structure. Landscaping and street improvements are also proposed. The site is currently vacant with the exception of an existing carport located on the northeast corner of the property that is proposed to be demolished. The property is vegetated with scotch broom, blackberries, grasses, and trees. The project would require the removal of 7 trees as well as the grading and fill of materials for site and street improvements preparation. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site generally slopes down towards the west with an overall gradient of approximately 10%. There is an existing carport located in the northeast corner of the property which would be demolished prior to the development. The remainder of the site is vegetated with scotch broom, blackberries, grasses, and trees. The development of the site would require the removal of seven on-site trees, including four 8- inch Cottonwoods, one 30-inch Fir, one 30-inch Alder, and one 24-inch Alder. The project would require on-site grading for the preparation of site construction and street improvements as well as the importing of structural fill. Approximately 540 cubic yards of on-site grading would occur, with approximately 160 cubic yards to be used as structural fill — for a total of 380 net cubic yards of earthwork to be removed from the site. A geotechnical report for the proposal, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. January 27, 1999, was submitted with the application. Based on soil test pits, the site is underlain by brown, medium dense, silty fine sand fairly uniform across the site. The geotechnical consultant concludes that these conditions are suitable for support of the building foundations as proposed, provided recommendations presented in the geotechnical report are incorporated into project design and construction. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to follow the recommendations contained within the geotechnical report. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and Construction Mitigation Plan approved prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated January 27, 1999, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr it Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 3 of 12 Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 2. Water Impacts: There are no surface water bodies or wetlands on the site. The construction of the proposal would result in a building lot coverage of approximately 35% and impervious coverage of approximately 50% of the 26,156 square foot site. Runoff from the proposed development would be collected in catch basins and pipes, then conveyed to a bioswale located in the southwest corner of the site. Storm water would then flow via NE 9th Place to existing storm water facilities in Edmonds Avenue South. The proposal would be required to comply with requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A 3. Environmental Health/Noise Impacts: Development of the site would result in noise impacts during the construction phase of the project. The construction of the project is anticipated to be completed by January 2000, therefore construction noise impacts would be short term in nature. The noise impacts are not considered significant due to the limited duration of the construction period and existing code provisions which limit the hours of construction activity would mitigate potential noise impacts to surrounding properties. Hours of construction activity within residential areas are limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. After completion of the project, noise impacts may result from increased traffic and activities associated with the additional residential population. The properties located directly south of the subject site are designated single family on both the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map and may be impacted by the proposal. The potential conflicts between adjacent uses were evaluated prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations for this area. Furthermore, adopted Comprehensive Plan policies (LU-119) and objectives (LU-R) encourage the development of uses appropriate for buffering less intensive residential uses from Center areas. Existing code provisions implemented through the evaluation of the site plan criteria will allow for the mitigation of impacts from the site to surrounding properties and uses. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A 4. Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City and would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction at a rate of $388 per multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee for the 12 multi-family units proposed is estimated to be $4,656.00 (12 units X $388 = $4,656.00). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. 5. Transportation Impacts: The proposed multi-family development would result in an increase in the number of traffic trips on City street systems. A Traffic Mitigation Fee would be assessed based on the siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environs II Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 4 of 12 number of average daily trips that are attributed to the proposed development. The number of trips is based on standards from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. It is estimated that the proposal would result in 6.63 average daily trips per unit, for a total of 79.56 new average daily trips for the 12-unit proposal. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is based on $75 per average daily trip and is estimated to be $5,967.00 (12 x 6.63 x $75 = $5,967.00). The Transportation Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee equal to $75 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. 6. Parks and Recreation Impacts: The proposal would result in the construction of 12 new multi-family residential units. Future residents would make use of existing and future parks and recreation facilities throughout the City. In order to mitigate the impact of residential development on the City's parks and recreation facilities, the applicant will be required to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee of $354.51 per new multi-family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $4,254.12 (12 x $354.51 = $4,254.12) and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measure: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $354.51 per new multi-family unit. The Parks Mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA), Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1) The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated January 27, 1999, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. 2) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi- family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee equal to $75 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $354.51 per new multi-family unit. The Parks Mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. siteerc City'of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn it Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF ' REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 5 of 12 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Building 1. The applicant is required to follow the recommendations of soils report, including field evaluations. 2. Accessibility must be provided per state amendments. Planning 1. Construction activity within residential areas is limited to 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday, and 9:00 am to 8:00pm Saturday pursuant to RMC section 4-4-030C3. The SEPA checklist submitted with the application incorrectly references proposed work hours of 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. 2. The landscape plan will need to be revised to provide a minimum width of 5 feet for all landscape areas, specifically the landscape strip along the property's eastern boundary. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The grading plan will need to include the elevations and intervals for the topography of the existing site, as well as the amount in cubic yards of grade and fill estimated for the project. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Either the planting proposed in the southwest corner of the site will need to be revised or the location of the fire hydrant will need to be moved so that the proposed tree does not interfere with the hydrant. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 2,500 GPM. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. An unobstructed Fire Department access must be provided from the parking lot to the apartment building at each entry. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The Sewer System Development Connection (SDC)fee is $350 per unit or(12 x $350 = $4,200.00). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. A clean out is required 5-feet out from the building. Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. The Storm Water System Development Connection (SDC)fee is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface or(13,920 x $0.129 = $1,795.68). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. The free board for the swale is to be 1-foot + design flow depth. Plan Review-Water 1. The Water System Development Connection (SDC)fee is $510 per unit or (12 x $510 = $6,120.00). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. Construction Plans are to be revised per July 8, 1999 Plan Review. Redline drawings for that review are to be returned with the next submittal. 3. The 1-inch domestic meter seems small for a 12-unit apartment building. This should be verified with the plumbing code sizing criteria. 4. The DCVA goes to the back side of the irrigation water meter. The position will need to be revised. 5. The domestic water meter will need to be located in the public right-of-way at the property line. Since the building is over 30-feet in height, a backflow prevention device is be required. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The applicant will be required to address the July 8, 1999 Construction Plan Review and return redline comments with the next submittal (comments circled on sheets C2, C4, C5, C7, C8 and C11 of redline drawings). Plan Review-General: 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over $200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Parks 1. Plans will need to be clarified in regards to the new Douglas Fir proposed at the same location as the new fire hydrant at the southwest corner of the property. siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environs it Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF ' REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 6 of 12 Police 1. Comments from the Police Department will be forwarded under separate cover. Please contact Cyndie Driggers at (425)430-7521 with Crime Prevention with any questions. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action X Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan, (Received August 3, 1999). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Landscape Plan, (Received August 3, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Building Elevations, (Received August 3, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Carport Elevations, (Received August 25, 1999). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Floor Plans, (Received August 3, 1999). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, Grading and Utilities Plans, (Received August 3, 1999). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 7, T.E.S.C. Plan, (Received August 3, 1999). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200E of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The site is designated Center Suburban on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The intent of the designation is to develop suburban centers which provide a wide range of consumer goods and services to an area which includes several neighborhoods, but is smaller than the entire city(Objective LU-T). The proposal is generally consistent with the following policies and objectives intended to guide development in the Center Suburban land use designation. Policy LU-97.1. Allow stand alone residential development in portions of Centers not conducive to commercial development. The existing topography in the area physically separates the site from commercial arterials. The site is not conducive to commercial development and is, therefore, appropriate for stand alone residential development. Policy LU-108. Vehicular circulation should be internal and access to adjacent streets should be consolidated. The proposed access to the site is via a singular driveway directly off NE 9th Place and adequate drive aisles and parking stalls are provided on- site. Policy LU-111. Site plan designs which locate parking lots associated with commercial uses, apartments or other uses behind or adjacent to structures are encouraged. Discourage parking lots from locating between structures and street rights-of-way. The proposal provides carport parking adjacent to the building on the east side of the site. Policy LU-119. Suburban center sites and structures should be more intensive in design and intensity (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and set-back; landscaping; siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn 11 Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF • REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 7 of 12 parking) than with land uses outside the Center. The proposal is more intensive in design and intensity than the adjacent single family developments located outside of the Center. However, potential negative impacts to the less intensive uses will be mitigated through the use of code required landscaping and screening. Objective LU-R. Create a buffer at the boundary of Centers to protect adjacent less intensive land uses from the impacts of urban activities within the Center. The proposed residential only development would serve as a buffer between the adjacent single family uses and more intensive commercial developments northeast of the site. 2. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is located in the Residential Multi-family Center Suburban (RM-C) zoning designation. The purpose of the RM zone is to provide and protect suitable environments for multi-family dwellings. The "C" suffix (Center Suburban) corresponds to areas designated in the Center Suburban Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposal's satisfaction of the applicable development standards of the RM-C zone is discussed below. Density - The RM-C zone requires a minimum density of 10 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and allows a maximum density of 20 du/ac. Net density is calculated after deducting sensitive areas and/or public roadways from the gross area of the site. The subject site does not contain any sensitive areas or areas to be dedicated to public right- of-way. The proposal for 12 dwelling units on a 0.6 acre site arrives at a net density of 20.0 dwelling units per acre—within the allowed density range. Setbacks —The RM-C zone requires a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet and a rear yard setback of 15 feet for primary structures. A minimum 12-foot side yard setback is required for lot widths greater than 120 feet. The code also requires that the entire structure shall be setback an additional 1 foot for each story in excess of 2 up to a maximum cumulative setback of 20 feet. Therefore, the proposed 3-story structure requires 13-foot side yard setbacks. The proposed building provides a 23-foot front yard, a 15.8-foot rear yard, a 40-foot side yard setback from the west property line, and an 80-foot side yard setback from the east property line — all of which satisfy the minimum standards. Detached accessory structures are required to maintain a 20-foot front yard setback and a 3-foot setback in rear and side yards. In addition, accessory structures must maintain a distance of at least 6 feet from primary structures in order to be considered detached. Eaves of structures are allowed to project into required setback areas a maximum of 24- inches. The proposed carport closest to the residential building has a setback of approximately 8 feet from the east side of the structure and has an overhang of 12- inches into the front yard setback. The carport on the east side of the property also projects approximately 12-inches into the front and side yard setbacks. Both carports satisfy all setback requirements for detached accessory structures. The subject site consists of two adjoining parcels. Although the proposal complies with the required setbacks as measured from the exterior boundaries of the site, the proposed residential structure straddles the dividing property line. In order for the proposal to comply with required zoning and uniform building code setbacks, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to either: 1) record a lot line adjustment which eliminates the dividing property line; or 2) record a restrictive covenant which prohibits the sale of the parcels separately. If the applicant chooses to record a restrictive covenant, language would need to be included which would rescind the covenant in the event a lot line adjustment resulting one parcel were recorded. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr it Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A, ECF • REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 8 of 12 Building Height - The RM-C zone allows a maximum building height of 35 feet and 3 stories for primary structures and 25 feet for detached accessory structures. The proposal complies with both of these requirements with a proposed height of 35 feet and 3 stories for the residential structure and 15 feet for the detached carports. Lot Coverage — The RM-C zone allows a maximum building coverage of 45% and impervious surface area of 75% of the total site area. The proposed building footprints total 9,210 square feet and arrive at a building lot coverage of 35% of the site. The impervious surface maximum is based on a combined total of the building footprints and all pavement areas. The proposed total of impervious area is 50% (13,081 square feet) of the 26,156 square foot site area. Landscaping — The RM-C zone requires all setback and open space areas to be landscaped, unless otherwise determined through the site plan review process. The proposal provides 13,075 square feet of landscaping throughout the site, consisting mostly of grass lawn with ornamental shrubs and trees around the perimeter of the site and the building. All landscaped areas are required to be a minimum width of 5 feet. The proposal satisfies these landscape requirements with the exception of the 3-foot wide landscape strip along the east property line. The applicant will be required to revise the plans in order to provide a minimum landscape width of 5 feet on the east side yard setback. The RM-C zone also requires that property located adjacent to a single family residentially zoned lot provide a 15-foot landscape strip along the adjacent street frontage. Property zoned for single family use (R-8) is located adjacent to the subject site on the south side of NE 9`h Place. The proposal provides a 20-foot front yard landscaped setback, thereby satisfying this requirement. However, the proposed plantings indicated on the landscape plan for this setback do not appear adequate to provide a satisfactory buffer to the less intensive adjacent uses. The provision of more acceptable landscaping is discussed further under the following criteria. Parking — The RM-C zone requires parking to be provided on-site either underground or within parking structures. The proposal includes two detached carports located on the east side of the property. For multi-family uses, the parking regulations require a minimum of 1.5 parking spaces per unit, plus an addition space for every 4 units for guest parking, to be provided on-site. The proposal for 12 multi-family units would be required to provide 21 off street parking spaces. The proposed carport parking provides 21 stalls, including 1 ADA accessible stall —satisfying this requirement. Standard ninety degree parking stalls are required to be 9 feet wide and 20 feet long. Ninety degree parking stalls also require a minimum back out distance of 24 feet. The proposal satisfies both of these requirements. The parking regulations also require parking areas to be adequately screened from adjacent residential uses (RMC section 4-4-080F). Although the landscape plan indicates planting on the street side of the parking area, the proposed plantings would not be adequate or of a sufficient height to provide acceptable screening of the parking area from the adjacent single family uses. The provision of more acceptable landscaping in this area is discussed further under the following criteria. 3. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES The subject site is surrounded by multi-family uses and zoning designations to the north, east and west, and is adjacent to single family residential uses and zoning on the south. The size, bulk and height of the proposed building would create a visual impact on the adjacent less intensive uses, specifically the southern elevation. The RM-C zone requirements for greater landscaped setbacks along frontages adjacent to single family zones are intended to buffer less intensive uses from more intensive siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval&Environm Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF ' REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 9 of 12 residential developments. The landscape plan provided with the application indicates only grass lawn along the street property line for the required front yard setback. As proposed, the plantings would not provide the necessary screening of the residential building from the adjacent uses. In addition, the proposed plantings in front of the parking area would also not be of a sufficient height to provide visual screening. In order to mitigate the impacts of the development to adjacent single family uses, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to revise the landscape plan to provide acceptable screening along the street frontage of the site. The revised plantings should be a minimum width of 15 feet and should be of a sufficient height and spacing to provide an adequate buffer for the residential building and parking area from the adjacent uses. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Potential short term noise and traffic impacts would result from the initial construction of the project to adjacent residents. These impacts would be mitigated by existing code provisions which limit the hours of construction activities within residential areas to 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday, and 9:00 am to 8:00 pm Saturday. 4. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE There are no significant natural or human-made features on the site that would be impacted by the proposed development. The proposal would construct a building covering approximately 35% and impervious surfaces covering 50% of the site area. Requirements to upgrade utilities and storm water facilities would mitigate impacts associated with development of the site. In addition, the applicant's Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) indicates the use of filter fabric and a temporary rock construction entrance in order to further mitigate the impacts of the development to the site. 5. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES The proposal would allow for the development of a currently vacant, underutilized property. The project is anticipated to conserve area-wide property values in the vicinity. 6. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Access to the proposed development would be provided by a single 26-foot wide driveway directly off NE 9th Place. The curb cut width and drive aisles in the parking area are adequate for vehicle circulation. The proposal includes street improvements to NE 9th Place which would result in the construction of a sidewalk for pedestrian use. The proposal would also provide a concrete walkway along the entry side of the building. However, as proposed the concrete walkway does not connect to the sidewalk on NE 9th Place and end at the proposed landscape plantings. In order to mitigate potential impacts to pedestrians entering the site via the parking area, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to extend the concrete walkway so that it provides a pedestrian connection from NE 9th Place to the entrances of the building. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The proposed multi-family development would result in an increase in the number of traffic trips on the local street system. It is estimated that the proposal would result in 6.63 average daily trips per unit, for a total of 79.56 average daily trips for the 12-unit proposal. The amount of additional traffic that would be generated is not anticipated to result in a significant impact on the local street system. A Traffic Mitigation Fee would siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environm I Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF • REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 10 of 12 be assessed through the SEPA Environmental Review process to mitigate for traffic impacts. 7. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR The proposed structure provides two windows per unit on the front and rear sides of the structure and is sufficiently setback from property boundaries to allow for adequate light and air circulation to the residential units and the site. The proposal also includes the installation of a street light as required by City code. 8. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which provides measures to reduce construction impacts. The applicant is also required to comply with code requirements limiting the hours of construction activities within residential areas. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a residential population. 9. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE There are adequate and available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed development. A discussion of existing utilities and planned improvements is provided in the advisory notes section of this report. The applicant would be assessed Fire, Traffic and Park mitigation fees to compensate for the increased demand on public services. 10. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT The proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by development a currently vacant property into an improved multi-family development. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the Cambridge Apartments, Project No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 8. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Suburban (CS). siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval&Environm I Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A, ECF • REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 11 of 12 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential Multi-family Center Suburban (RM-C) Zoning designation, provided the applicant complies with the conditions of approval. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Multi-family residential, zoned RM-C; East: Multi-family residential, zoned RM-C; South: Single family residential, zoned R-8; and West: Multi-family and single family residential, zoned RM-C. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, except as discussed in the body of this report. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Suburban (CS) and the Zoning designation of Residential Multi-family Center Suburban (RM-C). 3) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues are addressed in the body of this report. F. Decision The Site Plan for the Cambridge Apartments, File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following condition. 1) After the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney, the applicant shall complete one of the following prior to the issuance of building permits: a) Record a lot line adjustment which eliminates the dividing property line; or, b) Record a restrictive covenant that prohibits the sale of the parcels separately. If the applicant chooses to record a restrictive covenant, language would need to be included which would rescind the covenant in the event a lot line adjustment resulting one parcel were recorded. 2) The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide acceptable screening along the street frontage of the site. The revised plantings should be a minimum width of 15 feet and should be of a sufficient height and spacing to provide an adequate buffer for the residential building and parking area from the adjacent uses. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan in order to provide a complete pedestrian connection from NE 9th Place to the entrances of the building. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: 1-4/043 9' Z.1/gq Jana Hanson, Zoning Administrator date siteerc City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environm f Review Committee Staff Report CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF REPORT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Page 12 of 12 TRANSMITTED this 27th day of September, 1999 to the applicant and owner: Gerald Rieker&Soung Hee(owners) 11017 101st Place Kirkland,WA 98034 Frank Heffernan,AIA(contact) Ferrari Design Group P.S. 1277 134th Court NE#203 Redmond,WA 98052 TRANSMITTED this 27thst day of September, 1999 to the following parties of record: Molly Reimick 2511 NE 9th Place Renton,WA 98055 Florence B. Mathieson P.O. Box 2025 Renton,WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this 27thst day of September to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official C. Duffy, Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. siteerc CITY OF RENTON Density Worksheet 1. Gross area of property: 1. 26,156 square feet 2. Certain areas are excluded from the calculation. These include public and private roadways/easements (aside from driveways) and sensitive areas*. Total excluded area: 2. 0 square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area (or total of lot areas): 3. 26,156 square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. .6 acres 5. Number of dwelling units (d.u.) planned: 5. 12 units 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 20 d.u./acre 12 units would result in a net density of 20 dwelling units per acre. *Sensitive areas are defined as "areas not suitable for development which are included within the City's greenbelt, geologically hazardous, wetlands, or flood plain regulations." (City Code Section 4-31-2: Definitions) DENSW KS.DOT • =' /Ye— />2 .: ( I! FERRARItiln�m DESIGN -J " 8 gr �,.,E14 ;,� �� .�. GROUP • REMOVED Nli • _ 4 e A r DE nREaE° o ° 4 a E ,4 RE.u�e..o lSI•a-•- Lz::::: R u.e-�.+.• • .. syr eve : 9 MOON I l 7 mu.'le 4♦ m A.D•. . *LC, t R.E. VICINITY MAP E..<I,A• I sera.D„eD♦ 211 i,. ...•I UNIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION • /°""° UNITS. :AL.m,CK 2 24 LOT.N,A NS I IMINT LOT iu-.ARca rovaa-.uso.tL..w a-vos for.ia w r«w MO -- CAMBRIDGE .'R°PT eowLL°�R"'EeE.,:T'°�»"°°o.:oRro:r."�:o.'r« o.FT a`Ea'.°v:a:' • 3 19 APARTMENTS w a'.eo°1TM S.ALS FT M. TO POP LESS S.""iss.r TO NM u.uiwe�r�w • i:Twr.v�w Nr PT OPPNei+weRo'.r'Qy+'LOT 4104 v.o.NY1 Ple:re»e. • ♦ • 1 not NE.WW1 l'Isca PROJECT DATA • (� wT b 4 i i SENTO e.-c nxeenmAL nLDwNn OAT., COO• --- - — R�+w+a µnrLLOT.`.•10 ISAN TO TOTALE^.o •ii. r 1� f _. �.o.,.r..iRn I� A SITE PLAN; w� eo roR.i�w .nT ROOK i:ss.r. $ D h `�7{^"K • - p LEGAL DESCRIP n nro r.00'LOOR R.e.S.100.i'- i ?CACF • _ g• $ SITE DATA; LOT ,;,,CANT R Nn REWIRED STALLS P. - - lb i $ SITE DETAILS .o*Mu•D.1»e..COO AGSM MT.so STALLS MR w.WEST) °^- : i MONDE s.9. } p . INT w•rLDIN...]9.Sr STALLS RECURS.]i RR S1TE CONOTI S k 1 € ...WK.MCA..C..Sr. A.STALLS rRO IVED.21 STALLS I$ .cNN.eo.�aa ARE,,.SOS SPAT noa Sr �LD.r M N T ALLO NEO Ero• - - - --- R•.WENN,r.o.oeM"'K 1 1f • BUILDING/SITE NOTES Kwws J r^ '0 14 GERALDRIEKER .E 8 SOUNG HEE ���y - rA.,e.eN,NAR��Nne.o•TYPICAL -1* F Ux REC. ,. 'wet TO CIVIL IV.TOR weACN n..MO cam.. rw.ATNR.. �T'� ....._.._........ , Y].TALON»TO EOMPED 11111.1.FLY.PMA.RAN...TEN. _ +�0�11olernw ....«.a."mot • g 13 N..rN,w.w seoa RooN .ET F. :we NeATTeR MOM'MAUL M°�` ups,c v ...rwy.E I I I I°: ° wT _: 12 NIA TREATED w ca.rRee III N .r.TS 10 FKOPOSEDw.r . I I L o�a AN III .N«..DD T ..•_, I • �_ R• resew,.. p • NANawr. L RR MAIL DAM POWS 2a•PINE Lee DECK.o.•. SW SOLO CCM. !ASTMS '-1.' .� r•�• ' �Low eo.L.wD TO SS R rune, MO. FENCE DETAIL O • B +"•��••>,'..'E ` 9� - • • X `mac GeL .GALE MO St•Le _ » s •r.r e + —___- • xD K, WIT TO ..R,.reo,r GLEN rsr u.•ww T ...`N... SAL�N. `" P.m..o NM..c«E•MALES OR J r, as r ova s.a mine R re a..ra .o..eA. le.s.eTc_= • mine 44414 =elan- M A COMMO AT \.. STUN sorer °TEA IEThPLAG- MAILOXETAILON STSTEKI y. SOLID CONC. PERM DRUMM O SITE PLAN SDI t >LA e,« •�A E N ... .•. , NOTES 1 S 8851R9" E 0.:. PLANTING NOTES: ' I"" Is' Imo. S 8851.59' 0O� LAB a r ea !��AZA�SVATAZAi . 'p o .....,.m,.,..,,...r „r .: 61 50.9....0. a-u ,a R, .i.....a..'Otte t.r.,' tr-.. ,. 11 , V. "•_I \ oee lt.p.mie..tdY'...'+.w^ r ae Ot A ctoatgohyfos 1 uw—ursi 24'O. 4•pots va.,..m u., 1,4 P. IRRIGATION NOTES ...��� O' . • 0 — O Q 10 Pachysandra t. 24" O.C. — 4"pots. ,Q© .. .�r. .n.� 0:. LAWN 0 J O� ►3' `8 \\ '0 0 O 00 s' l000 o .'`.. ,r 4 . 0`00 0 O 0 r N c�.... r •1'•O 0 0 o oc :• 0 •. LAWN . 7 OO o0O m _ ..es. • `i !aP • OO ���, .• �.....m. .,m. © 000 =� v.. w« p O-O Vinca Minor 24" O.C. 4" ® m o. R=u"it ��/ iru=n O ,..S'III 0 0 �� pots g i it n—u—i nr:1-... . ,-,.9-- i t= gym~ 1=n-a=iF=VE o Q �� .m. . n=,=u-a=it•u =u=n=n-- �x ` �.. O } ... ..� 1•! �0 _Zip 00- s • 1j___ SLAWN MULTI-TRUNK TH • STING SHRUP�LINGN 885159 W 88 51 59" E 96.40' LAWN 65 OS Clifford Quality Landscapes �_ 2815 NW62nd Street Seattle, NA 98107 Renton Apartments '�f"VI\ �i Scott Radford 25xx NE 9th Landscape Planting Plan >n C Dar, VS/99 425-864-2797 Fax: 206-285-6570 Renton, WA f':.�1 ; ` Z:f r '''@I \� SCALE 1"=10' I` L-1 • • • MIN INN FERRARI DESIGN GROUP AROVICit usu.3.110TRE a IIM .dRJ ERR*OVER O.,e ,. r rv,. s • tgatIffti ia MER Est� OVER ...0 u CAMBRIDGE —_— ._���LS� L����i6"ra :Lr•SS r= - �L - —s APARTMENTS •iwv.nua. IIIIII I EXTERIOR -- --- ---- -- - _- - _ _ _ - -—-— SIDE =PL"= 1 o ew�e%.MOW' _-'---'--�--- '-'---' ---- ELEVATION IIIIIIIIIIil�llllllllll e""` —_ 1 GERALD RIEKER d SOLING HEE born WA WS em eai e es E.rrMM. ..u, WEN �.s SIDE ELEVATION sc.2,w•.ra -Er Om4 . uRMw CIRETERMV A3 . . • roil _ FERRARI DESIGN GROUP ___===_rrr=r==-LUZ.r=_� _r-_____i =-ra========_rr_=-r=___ _____________==_=-rr=___ _— _ �;r_=—r= r-Es--_ ___ --_---_ _ _ _ _ _____-?e ______-___=__r_--r==r_-r__= _-r___=r==_i____—__r_—r =r__—_ r—Y E. _====__�___L—_ =_ol__ A —_______________n__—��___�.=r_=_=__r=_—___�--_�_____—_==__—Z_ C. __� S m. L_ gee+ro+aa.�... C AM BRIDGE _ 1 ______ _______llr_��.T —�— ��__�r�l=��Y_ __�_ _� _____ii_��r l �S_— � .gib; ,�',# �__�si'�i __ ����-� ____ APARTMENTS 1 _---.1 mr __ ____ 1 ��LPFOR ROM o EXTERIOR •. .n _ iri„.... -_ - FRONT �� MM.. �DAM�� I ELEVATION = n ...""'= I = I_.-.-.1 n .u..------._ m n-=--=.1 I ... 0.... . 1_,.. - __ _ _ ____ _ . •A/ - -- -' O'M..—.r• I1 I ---- GERALD RIEKER __—'e""1.. � dSOUNGHEE ..--.L . ___—__. 1 !EWT!i'--!'LII z , r i , PPan OMO TO r1. n —_— rom ecwa. —_— —__ NIA OP On rrTLY. ..,c.0 • • FRONT ELEVATION „ ,. Oda AILT‘Or1 Al . . . . • . . • ri... FERRARI DESIGN GROUP AIRPORTS.II Mar SIM/. Mdlefr ` iff • nn • 6t13 6 6.12 6•12 •� ed] —Pi. e� e,i� �° ° '� 6.12 �a CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS - ii ii� _ _ ®i- -�1 I11I1�1 _ _ c......... . e 7e I111IIIININIII�IIIINNIIIII1III . _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllillllll Illlilllllllll�lllllllllil IIIIIIIIINIIIINIIIIII��I�Nll EXTERIOR —_--- I I MoI Ose.•o -- .o e..o WARP 1111111M.1111 --- REAR _—_ _ I I ELEVATION IN 1 CIF - Re ROM-_-_ INIIIIiiIINl�l�lllllilllllllllli IIIIIIIIIIIIIII_IIII illIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII n - 1-' NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�II�IIIIIIIIIBIIII ---- RIFl(EF : i 1101)IO1pfYa OMOP 11 ' 'Ali i [1:1 I J ...,,___ WA MrTO SITE,LAN WINO,AM MUM REAR ELEVATION OeyFw•'�m 16/ONAWC II D...b AVM MOMS A2 z MI ,21....... c 3 E _ FERRARI —.4.lea ..«_t=--i-— '. — ► k i ��. c_..L_ - — — — DESIGN '�_ —.r s '— cm—i 1 i .7, — _ IIJ _ GROUP e e E ...ea: wry. i tI I--- - - ; i i�'. By` isi' li" ' # _�#T .o..�. »w•em awl. ...-ranw a.m.m.o..I :r.•.rew Y.sM.0 ! r'..re eur ♦ �!Ifiriall .• f.2.• .4 i...n•Li_..1„., ......„...1.-...4.,j J.J... IL 1'41.4-- A....„..t...._!.. . ,, , .. -..,p • CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS ROOF FRAMING PLAN BUILDING SECTION S..1 E.e.nw Ray IV+4•ely.ype r:�'a'.:'. " I I .a ... " ROOF FRAMING i r. ELEVATIONS; .r— ., I I - - —Li.• o.c.,. su.o— #I i t ^�-�R�.n.erra (� • .cm ,w....�.. ... GERALD RIENER ' I &SOURG HEE 7•1 ewwagM• 1 i 1✓nwnww�gm,gem ., • .w... II j ice. NIA TYPICAL ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION • 10111110 1 ..e. I \\/(1.100......_ .Ztr..... •.PT.01,11,r1,-.\\ �.a jr:y.�.;,.�..... r'•...:tea m,. .�r' 71".""e:�".fir: LT: aw-e[A�..q/14. r KrrA Y. BEAM DETAIL POST SASE DETAIL 2 __ MIWIMINIM SD2 ir b 7.6 U & 813 1I 1 11, _ — — TYPICAL PAVEMENT & EXTRUDED CURB DETAIL — R. Q F..10.Ra W. I.J'L 5 .s`,•,, LUNAR-LANDSCAPING WEL — Z Cl- EL-nW a RKY/DE RMY R1WZ 1 D CRY ASPNK M CONCRETE MN. ILIP MIV a , _,_1 1"NAL I- NE DEPM CLASS"B- -'/j16- ---la---MAWR TO Esse--1 QZtT 1 ,.LWL ASPNKT F (NNN•. \t I--N!0- NE 9th PL I"9sx ni AcrEO Wants/6•CRU9rtD SURFACING 1M COURSE(CLASS A). I I/1• ------- - -"I iliZ 0 t4 X-SECT ON DETAIL +•OM CWPACrzo Wpm.I-r/•CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COLNSE, 2 Fir ZO (PER KCRS 11ti NO. 1-002) e•MIN.95R COMPALIEO STRUCTURAL ALL AND WARRY ROCK AS WOOOCKoloNG ON Sat CONpIKWS Y O• 'y NM ilMill Cr ^0N I I � W z GRAPHIC SCALE1 L¼S4v \ ' � I I l l f t�I , �'�T VICINITY MAP dy ,I. siIA Q 11 �__ fo-i4. � , (\ SIA L J�3'rMDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ,I ISO) MIN. ROCKINESS if /� � =.� ` NVL 720 LBROOM nNISin t ELM 1n N' , '� RIM n.IleDO % /-I�RADIUS1$ , I�i ' NV 14 IM.oO Jh O ° L_nv n1.6 ~� '/'�/ ■ I� �' a3eE9ErIu L . . .. � Y.MI a RIM EL 27000 �� _ I' \ wv u.lTSal'lc . .4 Lu E. a � IN 1! wv n.lu9r se• / J I NJ AT eJ T.9 I ��is�µ Acrto svecRADr LHJ6 lWE I OE 3/e'OR 1 1/1- R til i ,1■ ? 6RiY 11.�L ME ENGINEER rzHwKO RV 1F1 I 'I BIOSWALE SEcnoN A—A, SCALE 1'1<3' sa 113 PHIAV EL.mei •,` il �- �.3>wc MONOLITHIC SIDEWALK SECTION 11 (1WKK S w A [R0M(Ra p!BLDO) El.e1 I virpoilk 37 O.+l..r STA 1+16.3 NV FL.IIJJ ,� ' II, n'MO LrGN-s/re ONL v),e a�(r3sc le.eo l - -A1E111VIIIRO' �� /�1, v EL 1lS31 ti 111f fL.Irale' `Ilill — �1� Sae SA 46699.83•l�l,l' . �I�1 RN° EL'a°e OO; v n.1na64 II I+IrII itliNI1IF IN 1.41VVVIIIIILLLLLu 1 :;\ [♦�`. s ..0.12160 1'a ^Maa/Mr ACKWA, /• STA O+pL S6 RA TYPE M 'TrIJ III—I ���_��.� '����� �. n.eJL • 1•o--a.1 Y/ aTSFT 9..H L ZIT. FFSET: eM L '/ ` ` `�i=�\� \C RE EL 161S RN a.matt —P \`� \ w R Mt' 1�'a—�� ]ib Ell' 1es. Nva 1ee10 rvrr cPEP ca �,_\fit; h+`�r `T},., I y Iw NV EL.moo I7IL \ sE_,6631'S9•1I ' �'rA� '� ape" 4111k, IIFI ro'� +��� • - \�= Ce71 THE I \\ 136 U 11Y MP LIJt �6' II 1 \ •.. • STA Jxr.I+ ''1..\___ :7 . —���� ,_ I � RIMM EEL.. I6.00 raL �� _ —_ —STA I+3A IZSTL?.F ��.a • I --._-_J WNW.WALL d m.NY 16e73 WOW 173 �� — — — SECTION B B, 1 4 +� Wa NV El. ' 10'pAl •CE 1.; V EL.4001 PR �•: • STA:HBJ STA I+fI.aS 14e'[E NV 2R}46s e7LC SIA J+6e01,r.J9'RT �6• ��L} , wR STA.0.J10D /V EL 7)aJ0 L set�:r0.Y1 R WE NV n.IT63.6•a ex NY EL 277 6"N RN EL.1e411 / '-+•• a,ser o4o R N.E.N 9th PL. .n.1133 m.NV EL 273.0 II'[PEP STA ERMA MT LI. MV[L 1)690.a"R ISINIETCE • SIA I 44/36 NM(L.266e9 SIA 1446.J•ee6'GI. SS NY a.169.6J 6'NC S I OEY9' a63 l NV EL.760 IT SS NY M a.269.s3 6"P CROUP*EL169.I SO.NV O.111.1e St CorpW NV EL 166.06.11•CPEP n.1I9.4 ro"a NV EL 1645a WO, 4!'a-MANCE s • : g U U l 12 I _ w N R/w — — Z 3 rca u6 W 2 I RenHG pa va 3Q 1 cc MIN. O I �'iT, o 11" IIE.L Z LI .� \ ) GRAPHIC SCALE TEMPORARY ROCK ��� a Q.s CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Hill I I 1 EIEVAHUrl Ke Fur I <V 1. Use 1'to B 9uarr^ palls or&ruched rock for surfacing as shown. - et. Material with'fines o of acteptaDle. I I'-_1.1.1 q rtTER FABRM MATERIAL ~W Z aterial IDp of itracked i ntoot e p AI c e'ghth of way.necessary to insure Z Z VINO GROUND m s n err Br r.GA.RE 100'N/N 2- FABRM OR EWAL. 0 EXCEPT MAY BE REDUCED TO 50'MIN. NFOR SITES'NTH LESS THAN 1 ACRE (V IE) OF EXPOSED SOL. r� N I R.25.MIN. PRO MAaPE A19 Pv IS" . I ON A TER FABRM • Lr STEEL FENCE IS i PLAN EXISTING DRIVEWAY -- /�� rites r.WBRXTCmum AM iDek 6orxX ROTE t I ROAD SITE ACCESS I— '� if \, A� IMF Rwcs rD Gs7 .B"COTTON^_ ��. � 11 1 �� C..)a S O 2 =�=�II! ' I / , _ 2ABB.PM2 B(W YG wet EiE _ _ , a FP lTwe— I E '••. PROTECT CLEFTS DURING I'�� /��O�,I `\ . Q CONSTRUCTION.KEEP .•K if SEDIMENT IT Or ME STORM 111,1111g .l /II O .. pRANALY SYSTEM.USE HALF- / �1•I- _.•_uI CIRCLE BEHIND CURB INLETS ,!� ► _ 1J10 Z I • ' . ROOKY PROTELiK/N AS DURING STREET CONSTRUCTION. ■ rrzxlwL ix �eR1�PEiCH..'. - ` kJ ROOKY P OM-PROGRESSES. 1100p, '��•41 ;1.117-r-_-1-roliv I '� ,., vir , ' , II III I ` f a"MAT. i C/Rp/LAR SHAPE/S NOT ESSENITAL- 1�. ^ „�� MT.SREL F[IKE 5 VARY SHAPE JD fiT ORAINACC AREA AND TERRAIN.OBSERVE 1O CHECK FILTER FABRIC FENCE TRAP FFTICIENCY AND MODIFY AS r, ` "� DETAIL 1 Ill CA TCH BASIN / TRAPNECESSARYP D SET sC AAN rc rpaY _- `'IIIVIR ;4, �'g 1 I ADAPTED TO INRU-CURB INLET. ,I, ,,• _ 1 t.1 FRAME tr GRAEE FILTER FABRIC "-••���MIMMUM DEPM-I' I IFµTER FABRM NOTES 1 MAnYW DEP H_2' e �i, Pik — SEE uCATCH 54r RAP(YP) A m[nI TER'MIRK SHALLBB PURCHASED IN w CInN Nis ROLL I MAX ti �:T' ■t 'i' TO m LE M Or ME A rp TSLOPE 1:1 CLEAN OUT N SEDIMENT I$ till ,, , ,1. OvlirRi p Eli Dos r.�rw umiN!"oR �rvD was B'BELow EAR iEIIIIIII��11 �"�-' _'�,1. (- SECURELY FASTENED ME Po !6 f l�! DIMENSION r—— '' �ev'•• B. ME FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BEINSTALLED r0 FOLLOW ME I NSION CONTOURS(WERE FEASIBLE).ME FENCE POSTS SHALL BE SPACED w ■ wrwyM or D.APARTAND ORIVFN SCwRnY mro woe&RIND(MIN. 1 IOF LEAVE OUT BLOCK TEMPQfARILY I II 'IN\IL I.1 I r ENTRANCE �-).•1 INSERT ME TWM WE S EEN �11 Z �- ' le'• W' C. M[NCH$HALLBEEXCAVATED.RIGN<Y B'BMCANDu•OECP, CGRR I '.' 'U'r- 1 :. \ FABoPETO BE MANED.NT rome wooD Posr ro Auow TNrFTI TER I /r.42Z AND GRAVEL FILTER.KEMPOOL—-+ ;—IL„ ^ . FA BE MANED. a SECTION DEBARRED. "`_�, �_ ,/� I -— D. xwEN STAND M TITER rABRK:eS USED A*ME WSN COKIM/CI DOER M FENCE `a�RG• `1\ �_. .— SUPPORT FENCE SNAIL BE FASTENED SECIxTEIY TO ME UPSLOPE SIDE B— ATTACK FABRM ID E MC ��' `�`'�,1.�' ;'�\_ `�� , rt(�"��IIrk, Or ME POSTS UmNc NEAvr.TIE STAPLES AT LEAST I•LONG TIE • V `,.iY'I ` RCS.OR NOG RINGS.ME IRE SMALL EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A III��. g-i I ;��` "n.'�; ?� MIN.Or N SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE MAN b•ABOVE INE / G ® e4",1�I���� rEArE(rm.) oR/rxNu Dsxrr.cE �\ ME STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER nygM SHALL[L STAPLED OP w�R(D TI»�� �� � 1,-••• [. �E TRENCH.FENCE,AND INTER!A Or FABRIC 5�IrANOME SHALL MBE M�M 1 _ _ _ �. •• \�� 1RNA�� � / STAPLED�4f GROUND n5 'REFS SURFACE.FILTER FABRIC SNAIL NOT BC ABOVE _ --- - _ �� F. BT.eN FrmT.smeMeM TITER FABRM AND aosER Posr v.cNc ARE USD. THE IRE MCSN SVPpORT FENCE M.Y QE CIrYINw TED.IN SUCH — — _ _t�— j w CASE TIE FRYER FABRIC Is STAPLED OR BrREo DINE Ill.TO THE — tr I' �.-�� 1 T., ,� POSTS!Alm ALL OTHER PROwStoNS OF STANDARD NOTES APP(nNC. .... I ___ __- 273--N.E. 9TH PLACE —z_ tl A GRAVE,FENCE SHALL BE eArxnllEo RIM s/."HIN.DI.MErzR WASHED H I reran _ 51A 3.68.01.l Ae Ri N. TX TER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY NAVE SERVED RuwH[NrLY Si'A7jZCDOt./T NOT BEFORE NS le ME OPE AREA N.S BEEN es AESEnO.e2000D R SS MH. N.E.. . 9th L. RNEL.2B.B. RRI n.2fB.D2 XJV EL.17690.B•. L MI`rABRK ANC[S SHALL BF INSPCC>pD IMMEwATELY AFrzRAE,.CH WV EL.MO21 REQUIRED 4b LAST DA[r t�P�N& ON&[D R.RlALL. Y 7 REP ANTS ALL B N RNN IX CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 7. day of ejJ2WA14: QAr , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing !✓IPC c e_c -AW\tvv do . documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) `56„ d art-- k - Se �� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) 1l I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that c' Qk signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: c. � L�t�S / 7LIGL—rv,_ Notary Public i and for the State of W higton MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (Print) My appointitialiMpitistifiCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: 6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES tIlW 2' 2003 r• a"° N: .—_., ;._few.`n Nv ArdS V"^�1� Project Number: LVPk • (11 , l01 SR—1(4 , L cr NOTARY DOC • ss l; • 1 CITY iF RENTON NIL w` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 22, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on September 21, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. Location: 2520 NE 9th Place. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680J and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agncyltr\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 r CITY ‘_,F RENTON ..LL .\ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 22, 1999 Mr. Frank Heffernan, AIA Ferrari Design Group P.S. 12277— 134 h Court NE,#203 Redmond, WA 98052 SUBJECT: Cambridge Apartments Project Number LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Heffernan: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on September 21, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Also enclosed are comments from the Police Department. It is recommended that you comply with these comments. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, Ze571,,,, 7) 7-752 Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Mr. Gerald Rieker/Owner Enclosure dnsmltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker & Soung Hee PROJECT NAME: Cambridge Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2520 NE 9th Place MITIGATION MEASURES: 1) The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated January 27, 1999, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. 2) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee equal to $75 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $354.51 per new multi- family unit. The Parks Mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for the Cambridge Apartments, File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1) After the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney, the applicant shall complete one of the following prior to the issuance of building permits: a) Record a lot line adjustment which eliminates the dividing property line; or, b) Record a restrictive covenant that prohibits the sale of the parcels separately. If the applicant chooses to record a restrictive covenant, language would need to be included which would rescind the covenant in the event a lot line adjustment resulting one parcel were recorded. 2) The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide acceptable screening along the street frontage of the site. The revised plantings should be a minimum width of 15 feet and should be of a sufficient height and spacing to provide an adequate buffer for the residential building and parking area from the adjacent uses. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan in order to provide a complete pedestrian connection from NE 9th Place to the entrances of the building. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker& Soung Hee PROJECT NAME: Cambridge Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2520 NE 9th Place Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Building 1. The applicant is required to follow the recommendations of soils report, including field evaluations. 2. Accessibility must be provided per state amendments. Planning 1. Construction activity within residential areas is limited to 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday, and 9:00 am to 8:00pm Saturday pursuant to RMC section 4-4-030C3. The SEPA checklist submitted with the application incorrectly references proposed work hours of 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. 2. The landscape plan will need to be revised to provide a minimum width of 5 feet for all landscape areas, specifically the landscape strip along the property's eastern boundary. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The grading plan will need to include the elevations and intervals for the topography of the existing site, as well as the amount in cubic yards of grade and fill estimated for the project. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Either the planting proposed in the southwest corner of the site will need to be revised or the location of the fire hydrant will need to be moved so that the proposed tree does not interfere with the hydrant. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 2,500 GPM. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. An unobstructed Fire Department access must be provided from the parking lot to the apartment building at each entry. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The Sewer System Development Connection (SDC) fee is $350 per unit or (12 x $350 = $4,200.00). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. A clean out is required 5-feet out from the building. Cambridge Apartments LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. The Storm Water System Development Connection (SDC) fee is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface or (13,920 x $0.129 = $1,795.68). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. The free board for the swale is to be 1-foot+ design flow depth. Plan Review-Water 1. The Water System Development Connection (SDC) fee is $510 per unit or (12 x $510 = $6,120.00). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. Construction Plans are to be revised per July 8, 1999 Plan Review. Redline drawings for that review are to be returned with the next submittal. 3. The 1-inch domestic meter seems small for a 12-unit apartment building. This should be verified with the plumbing code sizing criteria. 4. The DCVA goes to the back side of the irrigation water meter. The position will need to be revised. 5. The domestic water meter will need to be located in the public right-of-way at the property line. Since the building is over 30-feet in height, a backflow prevention device is be required. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The applicant will be required to address the July 8, 1999 Construction Plan Review and return redline comments with the next submittal (comments circled on sheets C2, C4, C5, C7, C8 and C11 of redline drawings). Plan Review-General: 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Parks 1. Plans will need to be clarified in regards to the new Douglas Fir proposed at the same location as the new fire hydrant at the southwest corner of the property. Police Comments from the Police Department will be forwarded under separate cover. Please contact Cyndie Driggers at(425)430-7521 with Crime Prevention with any questions. PROJECT LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF Cambridge Apartments City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 11.04 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not iin use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2"in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. Solid walls in any stairway or decking should be avoided; this would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly with the numbers at least 6"in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. In addition,there should be some directive outside the building for Page 1 of 2 PROJECT LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF Cambridge Apartments City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) visitors. This will also aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. For the carport parking areas, it is recommended that bright lighting be provided. Car prowls are common for any type of open parking arrangement, and lighting will be the most useful deterrent. It is recommended that the residential areas be secured with controlled entrances to dissuade trespassing of non-residents. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. Page 2 of 2 Z A -�.�� Trespass N V 1�11 ��_ ►_i-�is USINES Enforcement WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSLNG NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code 06-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code *6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. Y o COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT . 5R . CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 4`'` 235 - 2571 • . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker& Soung Hee PROJECT NAME: Cambridge Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2520 NE 9th Place LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: September 27, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: September 21, 1999 SIGNATURES: G/ //till q/ /17 GVgrra'erma Administrator DATE Department{of P nning/Building/Public Works i Shepherd, dmin ra or P DAT / Community Serv' s / ��L�Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief'1 DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker & Soung Hee PROJECT NAME: Cambridge Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2520 NE 9th Place MITIGATION MEASURES: 1) The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated January 27, 1999, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., regarding site preparation, general earthwork and design criteria. 2) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per new multi-family unit. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee equal to $75 per new average daily trip attributed to the project. The Traffic Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee equal to $354.51 per new multi- family unit. The Parks Mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for the Cambridge Apartments, File No. LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1) After the review and approval of the Development Services Division and the City Attorney, the applicant shall complete one of the following prior to the issuance of building permits: a) Record a lot line adjustment which eliminates the dividing property line; or, b) Record a restrictive covenant that prohibits the sale of the parcels separately. If the applicant chooses to record a restrictive covenant, language would need to be included which would rescind the covenant in the event a lot line adjustment resulting one parcel were recorded. 2) The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide acceptable screening along the street frontage of the site. The revised plantings should be a minimum width of 15 feet and should be of a sufficient height and spacing to provide an adequate buffer for the residential building and parking area from the adjacent uses. The satisfaction of this requirement will be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan in order to provide a complete pedestrian connection from NE 9th Place to the entrances of the building. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker& Soung Hee PROJECT NAME: Cambridge Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles, landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2520 NE 9th Place Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Building 1. The applicant is required to follow the recommendations of soils report, including field evaluations. 2. Accessibility must be provided per state amendments. Planning 1. Construction activity within residential areas is limited to 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday, and 9:00 am to 8:00pm Saturday pursuant to RMC section 4-4-030C3. The SEPA checklist submitted with the application incorrectly references proposed work hours of 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. 2. The landscape plan will need to be revised to provide a minimum width of 5 feet for all landscape areas, specifically the landscape strip along the property's eastern boundary. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The grading plan will need to include the elevations and intervals for the topography of the existing site, as well as the amount in cubic yards of grade and fill estimated for the project. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Either the planting proposed in the southwest corner of the site will need to be revised or the location of the fire hydrant will need to be moved so that the proposed tree does not interfere with the hydrant. This will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Fire 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 2,500 GPM. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3. An unobstructed Fire Department access must be provided from the parking lot to the apartment building at each entry. Plan Review—Sewer 1. The Sewer System Development Connection (SDC) fee is $350 per unit or (12 x $350 = $4,200.00). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. A clean out is required 5-feet out from the building. Cambridge Apartments LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 Plan Review—Storm Drainage 1. The Storm Water System Development Connection (SDC) fee is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface or (13,920 x $0.129 = $1,795.68). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. The free board for the swale is to be 1-foot + design flow depth. Plan Review-Water 1. The Water System Development Connection (SDC) fee is $510 per unit or (12 x $510 = $6,120.00). These fees are collected when construction permits are issued. 2. Construction Plans are to be revised per July 8, 1999 Plan Review. Redline drawings for that review are to be returned with the next submittal. 3. The 1-inch domestic meter seems small for a 12-unit apartment building. This should be verified with the plumbing code sizing criteria. 4. The DCVA goes to the back side of the irrigation water meter. The position will need to be revised. 5. The domestic water meter will need to be located in the public right-of-way at the property line. Since the building is over 30-feet in height, a backflow prevention device is be required. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The applicant will be required to address the July 8, 1999 Construction Plan Review and return redline comments with the next submittal (comments circled on sheets C2, C4, C5, C7, C8 and C11 of redline drawings). Plan Review-General: 1. All required utility, drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. The fee for review and inspection of these improvement is 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of anything over$100,000 but less than $200,000, and 3% of anything over$200,000. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Parks 1. Plans will need to be clarified in regards to the new Douglas Fir proposed at the same location as the new fire hydrant at the southwest corner of the property. Police Comments from the Police Department will be forwarded under separate cover. Please contact Cyndie Driggers at (425)430-7521 with Crime Prevention with any questions. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTIC�ERMINATIaM1ENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Charlotte Ann Kassens first dulysworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the RENTON,WASHINGTONewCommittee The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Proposal to develop a 12-unit multi-family a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal residential apartment building. Location: newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months 2520 NE 9th Place. Appeals of either the priorto the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language environmental AC19 determination- IRCor W 9 � 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County the land use decision must be filed in writ- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the or befp 5: PM October t , 1999. If no appeals a 0 are filed by this date, State of Washington for King County. both actions will become final. Appeals The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by Cambridge Apartments City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 9 P 11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the as published on: 9/27/99 1enton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$40.25, Publication Date:September 27,1999 charged to Acct. No. 80510 Published in the South County Journal September 27, 1999.6631 Legal Number 6631 egal Clerk, So County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on thisc3 da of 194_ Y 1(2.1,:, `Op�til4t,,t .;t12 )1}N 74 id Notary Public of the State of Washington Y:• : t, a residing in Renton King County, Washington • i• N 4C ' °1O°e 0F WAS 14 ° NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Proposal to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building. Location: 2520 NE 9th Place. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. Publication Date: September 27, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot NoncE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF The proposal is to develop a 12-unit multi-family residential apartment building in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story structure containing 12 two-bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles,landscaping and street improvements. The project requires Environmental(SEPA)Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. Location: 2520 NE?Place. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197.11-6801 and/or the land use decision must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM October 11,1999.If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final.Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4.8.11B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430.6510. ii....fi Inv\ mr,grI::. : . 4 I 'CCo"Silmi ©'' �^ "I i 39r�.■ 1 rAL e • � ie1 a.N i;Fr .a,1 `ram❑ . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, �,�1 CPS 6 1;712,7 itA_, hereby certify that - copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property onSc -y�,� r,, , �i�j�; . Signed: Lt..--a/e- c L�ATTEST: Subcribed apd sworn b fore me, a Nortary Public, e State of Washington residing m\\ �--„'' , on the `SO l day of ) 919 ARARILYN iCAWiCHEFF }-n u r ..� z NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARILYN KAMCHEFF JUNE 29, 2003 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 l it WWashington State Northwest Region Ai Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133 9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 August 27, 1999 Lesley NishihiraC�N OF RENTONNiNG DEVE MENT P City of Renton Development Services Division AUG 31 1999 1055 S Grady Way RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055-3232 RE: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Cabridge Apartments Dear Ms.Nishihira: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Notice of Application for the Cabridge Apartments,which are located at 2520 NE 9th Place in Renton. We have reviewed the subject document and have no comments. The project will not have significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please call John Collins at (206) 440-4915. Sincerely, Craig J. Stone,P.E. Area Administrator- South King CJS:jc JTC cc: file City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: po1iC. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 26, 1999 APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Cambridge Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78566 LOCATION: 2520 NE 9`" Place SITE AREA: 26,156 sq.ft. (.6 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,964 sq.ft. proposed SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 unit apartment complex with carport parking in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would be three stories in height and would include landscaping. The project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet )Dy CFS f�nnuall� See a cimn�� . B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. b-ne 9-n-9 Signature of Director •uthorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF Cambridge Apartments City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 11.04 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING Each unit should have solid core doors,preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2"in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. Solid walls in any stairway or decking should be avoided; this would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly with the numbers at least 6"in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. In addition, there should be some directive outside the building for Page 1 of 2 PROJECT LUA-99-109, SA-A, ECF Cambridge Apartments City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) visitors. This will also aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. For the carport parking areas, it is recommended that bright lighting be provided. Car prowls are common for any type of open parking arrangement, and lighting will be the most useful deterrent. It is recommended that the residential areas be secured with controlled entrances to dissuade trespassing of non-residents. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. Page 2 of 2 Tres p ass SJr �...• o can-azr c USINES En f o r c e m e n t WATCH Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City ofRenton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY -THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POLNTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BULLDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: • NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSE G This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code 46-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code 46-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. Y r,� COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT �� 235 - 2571 a City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:comm.L DeUQIcr$ L4J COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 26, 1999 APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Cambridge Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78566 LOCATION: 2520 NE 9th Place SITE AREA: 26,156 sq.ft. (.6 acre) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,964 sq.ft. proposed SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 unit apartment complex with carport parking in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would be three stories in height and would include landscaping. The project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation • Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS N c d°°.-c, 1 55 vZ 5 i 6r4-145tp5zcic 0-7'"w i^uz— C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / I Signature Q'rector or hor ed Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Work ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ry\ COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 26, 1999 C�'n APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira . qt. ,.fly, 7 PROJECT TITLE: Cambridge Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78566 • , LOCATION: 2520 NE 9th Place b�". , h ��`� ` SITE AREA: 26,156 sq.ft. (.6 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,964 sq.ft.proposed Iv/ e /�/ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 unit apartment complex with carport parking in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would be three stories in height and would include landscaping. The project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS t-r-a 6,+ Co Y �_v I �, S C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areaswhere additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.• `)/ / // ci Signature of Director or Authorized Represent6tive Date devapp Rev.10/93 THE CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS 2500 Blk.N.E. 9TH PLACE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Environmental Review PERMIT No. C90096 .September 1, 1999 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The Transportation Mitigation fee is $5,967.00. 2. Address July 8, 1999 Construction plan review and return redline comments with the next submittal. (Comments circled on Sheets C2, C4, CS, C7, C8 and CI I of redline drawings). 99cm080T 99CM080T.DOC\ 373 411) �rY O T ANSPO�RTATION MITIGATION FEE Project Name Camay I CL(a. Ap-d. v-f- w,e.t Project Address N E 9 r-" PI, • Eh Ed o,-.d S Ada N.•E.• Contact Person Ca e v i©l 1 ? i e-k e Y Address 1 ( O1l — ofs L . N.E . k , vK ) awl, WA! . 9S03 c4 -2 z Z5 - 6 ea- Phone Number (zo (o 3e>t5 -s 9 r / 4 a /� Permit Number L() qq -ID AP Project Description ( 2 /,/ ,/,/}. Bi-aciL 7 , Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: r,EKResidential Jv.d A ITE Trip Generation Manual E Retail ❑ Traffic Study AcvNari-fetail ❑ Other Calculation: lvi ic, ici* 6 . 63 LTC Sec, c`z--7.-0, ? - 300 4, t`'_ g.d.,f) c-- :,- [ Z• x l0 . 63 7 ?,C4 jrriS , 75" x 77• s6 _ , r> 9C)7. .,— o Transportation Mitigation Fee: $ S J 9'6'7' Calculated by: l ', c1/-7 '2 Date: IPAccount Number: Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: h5t s„Alic(A COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 , � • opRFNTo APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 26, 1999 ACC;APPLICANT: ter. N APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira r, 6 7999 PROJECT TITLE: Cambridge Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78566 II V /:J/a LOCATION: 2520 NE 9th Place ry SITE AREA: 26,156 sq.ft. (.6 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,964 sq.ft. proposed SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 unit apartment complex with carport parking in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would be three stories in height and would include landscaping. The project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS L OC.y et arc o C et-JD 4 ri O i..�S eF See/C..s r¢s VeLl/D/N4 101106-0 Mil41.047"!d PACOv10� GLSS/.A/c./ T7 PEE- sr-ft lir A-H0✓P tic WTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 `.c C.t7tr.1 144. t a 5r ` City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pi�y-\ V�CW . ll)a��.Y' COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 26, ti;) rot- APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira , �qt PROJECT TITLE: Cambridge Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78566 , LOCATION: 2520 NE 9`h Place SITE AREA: 26,156 sq.ft. (.6 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,964 sq.ft..proposed SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 unit apartment complex with carport parking in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would be three stories in height and would include landscaping. The project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air _ Aesthetics Water / Light/Glare Plants t/ Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representati / Date J devapp CT�JD� Rev.10/93 THE CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS 2500 Blk. N.E. 9TH PLACE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Environmental Review PERMIT No. C90096 .September 1, 1999 WATER COMMENTS: 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is $510 per unit to be paid when the construction permit is issued. (12 X$510=$6,120.00). 2. .Construction Plans to be revised per July 8, 1999 plan review. Redline drawings for that review to be returned with next submittal. 3. The 1-inch domestic meter seems small for a 12 unit apartment. This should be verified with the plumbing code sizing criteria. 4. The DCVA goes to the back side of the irrigation water meter revise positions. See redline drawing. Review construction plan per redline comments provided July 8, 1999 and return redline drawings with next submittal. 5. The domestic water meter to be located in the public right of way at the property line. If the building is over 30-ft. In height a backflow prevention device will be required. 6. The DCVA goes to the back side of the irrigation meter. Revise position. 99cm080W 99CM080W.DOC\ City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Sl,.f . was-t J t.V'COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 26, 1999 APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nisira PROJECT TITLE: Cambridge Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78566 O�aPArrON LOCATION: 2520 NE 9th Place 41/t SITE AREA: 26,156 sq.ft. (.6 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross):, 11,964 sq.ft. propoSg& SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 unit apartment complex with>r'erppO,,pp rking in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would be three stories in height and would include landscaping. The project requires enviFdtt l review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. L 17ys Signature of Director or Authorized Repres tative Date devapp Rev.10/93 • r THE CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS 2500 Blk. N.E. 9TH PLACE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Environmental Review PERMIT No. C90096 .September 1, 1999 SEWER: 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $350 per unit or (12 x $350 = $4,200). To be paid when construction permit is issued. 2. A clean out is require 5-feet out from the building. STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Storm Water System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface or(13,920 x$0.129=$1,795.68). To be paid when construction permit is issued. 2. The free board for swale is to be 1-ft. +design flow depth. 99cm080S,D 99CM080S.DOC\ • r' Cityof Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works E N TC71v FIRE D E PT P ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 2 6 1999 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pure_ p .ham COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 26, 19991 ../L2 V L1 APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Cambridge Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78566 LOCATION: 2520 NE 9th Place SITE AREA: 26,156 sq.ft. (.6 acre) BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,964 sq.ft. proposed SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 unit apartment complex with carport parking in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would be three stories in height and would include landscaping. The project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services _ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet A)o /11( r 1�&GA 41 fJ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS cc66/ZW00.144„91/l_61 " d-� We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w ere ditt ionalinformation is nee9 o property assess this proposal. Q� Signatu f Director or Author!zed Re enjr- Date devapp Rev.10/93 M � O • '� , CITY OF RENTON 'e;" FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: August 30, 1999 TO: Lesley Nishihira, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire MarshaN�� SUBJECT: Cambridge Apartments, 2520 NE 94 Place Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2500 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$4,656.00 is required based on $388.00 per unit. 3. Separate plans and permit are required for the installation of the fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 4. Provide an unobstructed fire department access from the parking lot to the apartment building at each entry. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Ili • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 12(044,3 COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 26, 1999 APPLICANT: Gerald Rieker PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: Cambridge Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78566 LOCATION: 2520 NE 9«' Place SITE AREA: 26,156 sq.ft. (.6 acre) I BUILDING AREA(gross): 11,964 sq.ft.proposed SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 12 unit apartment complex with carport parking in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would be three stories in height and would include landscaping. The project requires environmental review and administrative site plan approval. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the ' Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C/ %e3M)//ner--/-7a-k.),A.-' IF 431, 5 u,-72.//-- ,1 zc/of � ac) voeJ/to -ice Q j4G2� afaiagcox,, c.1 7z-o „k_ piaAtbled 6r--0-( a ALIA-) e hze--)a.-/ril-cz?`—‘:;-;et.), einnai-- CODE-RELATED MENTS )A0-16--t - P-e-eaSe7=4‘, 7 1 . - G l/I,0 iC D 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad 'ional information is ed to properly assess this proposal. s-p,-2./____T___ Sign a of irector or Authoriz d Representa ive Date devapp Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: "lriA C.AM ?--k bcoE. AP lek.�tv S APPLICATION NO: LUA •cl el - I cal , sW —W , CC-r The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Smith, Richard J & Cheri Mager 1007 Edmonds AVE NE 082305-9047-06 Renton, WA 98056 Calvary Baptist Church 1032 Edmonds AVE NE 082305-9073-03 Renton, WA 98056 082305-9135-09 092305-9057-02 092305-9086-07 Mathieson, Florence B PO Box 2025 092305-9058-01 Renton, WA 98056 Nass, Ivan L& Beatrice M 960 Edmonds AVE NE 092305-9059-00 Renton, WA 98055 092305-9210-06 Pham,Ahn Hoand & May Vern 1012 Edmonds AVE NE 092305-9119-08 Renton, WA 98056 Nelson, Merle C 3013 Azalea CT SE 092305-9131-02 Olympia WA 98501 092305-9186-06 Freeman,Jeffrey R& Eleanor 222 Queen Anne AVE N 092305-9158-00 CIO Curtis West Realty Inc • Seattle WA 98109 Trihn, Bao Q 964 Edmonds AVE NE 092305-9207-01 Renton, WA 98056 Kennedy, Karen A 933 Edmonds AVE NE 722750-0166-01 Renton, WA 722750-0230-03 Elder, Edith C 21322 96th AVE S 722750-0170-05 CIO Portman, Karen Kent, WA 98031 Martinez, Romualdo Ruiz 919 Edmonds AVE NE 722750-0215-02 Renton, WA 98056 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) Reynolds, Ray H 925 Edmonds AVE NE 722750-0220-05 Renton, WA 98056 Reel, Ira L 929 Edmonds AVE NE 722750-0225-00 Renton, WA 98056 Dickinson, Herbert M PO Box C-34040 722750-0355-02 c/o Rainier Mortgage Co Seattle, Wa 98124 Higashi, Alan K 930 Edmonds AVE NE 722750-0360-05 Renton, WA 98056 Hawkins, Kathleen M 926 Edmonds AVE NE 722750-0365-00 Renton, WA 98056 Anderson, Sean D &Troy M 3008 NE 5th PL 722750-0370-03 Renton, Wa 98056 Schuh, Harry 916 Edmonds NE 722750-0375-08 Renton, WA 98056 Tillman R E 915 F ST 722750-0405-02 Renton, WA 98056 Flores, Juan C & Guadalupe J 909 Ferndale Circle NE 722750-0410-05 Renton, WA 98056 Molzan, Nancy M 4209 SW 329th PL 722750-0415-00 Federal Way, Wa 98023 Lai, David 900 Harrington AVE NE 722750-0420-03 Renton, WA 98056 Pedersen, Mary 923 Ferndale Circle NE 722750-0425-08 Renton, WA 98056 Sterlington, K W 2215 NE 10th PL 722750-0430-01 Patton, G Renton, WA 98056 Grubesic M Maxine &Johnson 924 Ferndale Circle NE 722750-0435-06 Renton, WA 98056 Orffer, Ona V& Norman L 935 Ferndale Circle NE 722750-0440-09 Renton, WA 98056 Bryan, Richard A 939 Ferndale Circle NE 722750-0445-04 Renton, WA 98056 Reinick, Mollie 2511 NE 9th PL 722750-0475-07 Renton, WA 98056 Burch, Orrel J 908 Ferndale Circle NE 722750-0480-00 Renton, WA 98056 Timmons, Darrell K 912 Ferndale Circle NE 722750-0485-05 Renton, WA 98056 Tucker, Carl & Mithce 916 Ferndale Circle NE 722750-0490-08 Renton, WA 98056 Huynh Toan B & Chinh K 920 Ferndale CT NE 722750-0495-03 Renton, WA 98056 Ross, Simon R&Yuliya 14680 NE 35th ST#A 102 722750-0525-07 Bellevue, WA 98007 United States 722780-1055-07 Deshaw, Eric 955 Edmonds AVE NE#201 922590-0090-02 Renton, WA 98056 • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification C I'ttic{ L. and Soling flee fI eker , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records J. C4 '',, ❑ Title Company Records ; �' �`�'°" ^42 tt,� D` ' g County Assessors Records V:0NOTARy V: * --�-- Signed _--_ y Date 7/v /9.?e i '•. Pm:, (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notar% Public, in and for the State of Washington y� residing at K_vt W M d on the �I El of �&f , 19 619. Signed L/► (�f tary Public) *""For City of Renton Use**" CERTIFICATION OF MAILING MARILYN KAIACHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC I,stentittL C , otenereby certify that notices of the proposed app!c8 A E,OFeWblSW1N6TON t (City Employee f 1, COMMISSION EXPIRES each listed property owner on_5 I Z-(01 19 TJUNE 29, 2003 II! . Signed 541lstaY0l k . SGc.atte Date: 714111 NOTARY ATTE . T: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Was ington residing at `iCo a on the a'7 day of Q`u , 19g/ �j Signed � 7GL� T1 ez.yn as, listprop.doc (J REV 07/98MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2 tint Y O O f Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Lesley Nishihira,Project Manager,Development ♦ �� ♦ Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 9,1999.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project rYi m tin' Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified o1 any N'C decision on this project. NOTICE OF APPLICATION CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: August 26,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to construct a 12-unit apartment complex in the RM-C Zone.The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story building consisting of 12 two bedroom units.The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles,which would be located on the east side of the structure. Landscaping and street improvements are also proposed.The project will require the removal of 7 trees as well as the grading and fill of materials for site and street improvements preparation.The project requires Environmental(SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. PROJECT LOCATION: 2520 NE 9'Place OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 3,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 26,1999 .- -_ ,.; APPLICANT: Mr.Gerald Rieken 8 Soung Hee;Cambridge Homes NW;11017-101' Nrc'••• R\ `�1.. tg-r"7 Place.Kirkland,WA 98034,(206)300-5911 II.. � �iaJ2 I .-.•yet:•I ri�nkv • OWNER: Same as applicant ,es .t ,tl rw r.V tar . Permits/Review Requested: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF);Administrative Site Plan ••In _ O � %, �R 4 Approval T,� }�1 • t Other Permits which may be required: Building Pamela;Construction Permits t• r! . h . , , / Requested Studies: Geolechnical Report;Drainage Report - I t Location where application may ' ,, ,"=1•':A,- fA I.IF. ,7; 1, be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, yy�L �t !- 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 -aegl ••• " .�4/Aw,.__ PUBLIC HEARING: N/A '1'I. ySi CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: �'� rtly j� I � ru l.7 ( TII _'sY, e � J' "�l7-•-• as I.�"1 l�. ..5.:Lu t.■ Land Use: The subject site is designated Center Suburban on the Ciys Comprehensive �!}'•17 r h- pp Q .-T..1.9 1 lh '^ Plan Land Use Map and is zoned Residential Multi-Family with a Suburban _ h r Y �}�55 7rs4�, Center(RM-C)designation.The proposal for 12 multi-family units is supported 1, r 1l � +' :, ••i<W - by policies contained within the Comprehensive Plants Land Use Element.The ...l s,.F i swYti4• proposal also appears to satiety the development standards of the RM-C zone, S L i ... including code provisions requiring parking within structures. i c;I 4 iann.,,e. t- ❑ Density: The proposal for 12 multi-family units on the.6 acre site arrives al a net density of y�, I. rams ` 20 dwelling units per acre.This is consistent with the density range permitted in I,Itia w&gam h _ ,'s the RM-C zone,which is a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 20 du/ac. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None known. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the Ciy's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Shoreline Master Program,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures' 1. Fire Mitigation Fee based on 5388 per new multi-family unit. 2. Traffic Mitigation Fee based on 575 per new average daily trip attributed to the project based on the ITE Manual. 3. Parks Mitigation Fee based on 5354.51 per new multi-family unit, mi1D1 aewnwd CERTIFICATION I, Les L.(. ) 4 : 7,Ilih•IY hereby certify that '3 copies of the above document were posted by me in '� conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on c z-A_A H - A-vz 1;G,-' a p j 141/ 'j . Signed: iteat, 7)/7 ::De ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for e State of Washington residing in ---1 ,)- -.. c,:- , on the / y i)-\ day of-,„..), ,_.J 1 q ci 5 -----)')/i a'P a,....-„ MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC MARILYN KAMCHEFF • STATE OF WASHINGTON MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUKE 29, 2003 •4'_'-to.- . 6< !4 e NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: August 26,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to construct a 12-unit apartment complex in the RM-C Zone. The proposal would result in the construction of one three-story building consisting of 12 two bedroom units. The project also includes carport parking for 21 vehicles,which would be located on the east side of the structure. Landscaping and street improvements are also proposed. The project will require the removal of 7 trees as well as the grading and fill of materials for site and street improvements preparation. The project requires Environmental(SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan Approval. PROJECT LOCATION: 2520 NE 9th Place OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 3, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 26,1999 APPLICANT: Mr.Gerald Rieker&Soung Hee;Cambridge Homes NW; 11017—101 st Place,Kirkland,WA 98034, (206)300-5911 OWNER: Same as applicant Permits/Review Requested: Environmental Checklist Review(ECF); Administrative Site Plan E J Approval Other Permits which may be required: Building Permits;Construction Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report;Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is designated Center Suburban on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and is zoned Residential Multi-Family with a Suburban Center(RM-C)designation. The proposal for 12 multi-family units is supported by policies contained within the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Element. The proposal also appears to satisfy the development standards of the RM-C zone, including code provisions requiring parking within structures. Density: The proposal for 12 multi-family units on the.6 acre site arrives at a net density of 20 dwelling units per acre. This is consistent with the density range permitted in the RM-C zone,which is a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 20 du/ac. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None known. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Shoreline Master Program,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. Fire Mitigation Fee based on$388 per new multi-family unit. 2. Traffic Mitigation Fee based on$75 per new average daily trip attributed to the project based on the ITE Manual. 3. Parks Mitigation Fee based on$354.51 per new multi-family unit. genmalot A Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 9.1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION a., pli \ , unser_'yfl . 5 , bx • Jos .yJ-3.i;?7. . . f :yyA Mrs LJ Q u!. _ �aT��S2` _� _ in cial qM Pt. :'r` ' 'ail& �{„y. !p .. s U11����� � •'•:� lJ yin `T��.Tr�t L'y�� P.IMI 'I W z. ‘A®41, 6• ?� `' fit,; 97. n��^�,10TII .jr y� • q 9TM rr3C y • :., Y 't do,in Y �Y 1y , it {/y n�.M 8 N .N 3+�7 LI �tyW 1 E•II �' e W s.�� � 7 �cj z .'rl 3 � L*:� ry I . Ighlands U 14, titaii4_. a 1.. „ 7:: Park ri •1,� N E. genmalot d`, i CITY 1_ F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 26, 1999 Mr. Frank Heffernan, AIA Ferrari Design Group P.S. 12277— 134 h Court NE, #203 Redmond,WA 98052 SUBJECT: Cambridge Apartments Project Number LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Heffernan: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. The Environmental Review Committee tentatively schedules it for consideration on September 21, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions. Sincerely, b4144-) 47-2-2.7D Lesley Nishihira Project Manager cc: Mr. Gerald Rieker/Owner acceotance 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 �, ,: CITY �.-F RENTON soli Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 20, 1999 - Mr. Frank Heffernan, AIA Ferrari Design Group P.S. 12277— 134 h Court NE, #203 Redmond,WA 98052 SUBJECT: Cambridge Apartments Project Number LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Heffernan: Thank you for your quick response to my letter dated August 16, 1999, which raised two issues regarding your land use application. The comments you made were extremely helpful in clarifying my request for revisions to the proposal. In response to the first issue, the proposed carports would be considered detached accessory structures. As proposed, the carport along the east property line appears to comply with the required 3-foot side yard setback as well as the 20-foot required front yard setback for detached structures. Therefore, the side yard setback for the carport would not need to be revised and a variance request would not be necessary. Secondly, after researching King County Assessor's Map and the recorded plat maps of adjacent properties, it has been found that 50 feet of dedicated right-of-way currently exists along the frontage of the subject site. Therefore, no further street dedications would be required and the proposal would be able to satisfy maximum density requirements. However, in order to initiate the review of the proposal, 12 copies of plans depicting the proposed elevations of the carports are still necessary. In addition, reductions (PMTs) of the elevation plans would be required. Once the carport elevation plans and reduction are received, the project will be accepted as complete and the review of the proposal will be initiated. If you have any questions, please contact me at(425)430-7270. Sincerely, • Ze 1,/ti-j 4 7 2-2. D Lesley Nishihira Project Manager C: Gerald & Soung Hee Rieker, Property Owners 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 all This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer I CITY vF RENTON ..it -•�... Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 16, 1999 Mr. Frank Heffernan,AIA Ferrari Design Group P.S. 12277— 134 h Court NE,#203 Redmond,WA 98052 SUBJECT: Cambridge Apartments Project Number LUA-99-109,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Heffernan: Thank you for your recent land use application for the above referenced project. After a preliminary review of the application materials, there are two items that need to be addressed and may require revisions to the proposal prior to the acceptance of the application. 1. Side Yard Setback/Variance The proposed carport along the east property line does not comply with the required side yard setback for the RM-C zone. All structures, including carports, are required to maintain the appropriate front, rear, and side yard setbacks of the zone. In this case, the side yard setback must be a minimum of 10% of the lot width (16 feet). In order to comply with this requirement, the proposal would need to be revised. If the proposal were to remain as is, a Variance Justification, amendments to the Project Narrative, and an additional fee of$100.00 would be required. In addition, elevations depicting the carports would be required. 2. Density Requirements The proposal would be required to dedicate a portion of the property to public right-of-way. In order to achieve the minimum required street width of 50 feet for NE 9th Place, 5 feet of the property for the full length of the site's frontage would need to be dedicated. The required dedication would be deducted from the total area of the site before calculating density. Taking this into consideration, the proposal appears to exceed the maximum permitted density(20.0 dwelling units per acre) in the RM-C zone. In order to initiate the review of the proposal, the application will need to be revised to address the two issues discussed above. Please follow the attached submittal instructions for"Revisions." At this time, the project has been placed "on hold"and will remain under this status until September 13, 1999. If revised plans have not received by this date, the application materials will be returned and a refund for 80% of the land use application fees will be issued. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425)430-7270. Sincerely, /27w Lesley Nisht64112. ira Project Manager C: Gerald & Soung Hee Rieker, Property Owners 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 19)This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REVISIONS TO EXISTING LAND USE APPLICATIONS In order for the Development Services Division to process your revisions, you will need to deliver or mail the following information to the Development Services Division, sixth floor, Renton Municipal Building, 1055 Grady Way South, Renton, Washington, 98055: • Cover letter detailing the nature and extent of your revisions and/or additions. The letter should include your project's City file number and list each previous submittal and note what changes, if any, are to be made (see sample letter, on reverse side). EXTENSIVE CHANGES TO YOUR ORIGINAL APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE A NEW APPLICATION FORM. • Additional review fees/postage, if required, and/or a written request for fee refund, if applicable. • Please provide eleven (11) copies of all new/revised submittals (unless otherwise requested by the Development Services Division). • Please provide one (1) 8 1/2" by 11" PMT reduction (white) for each plan sheet revised. Royal Reprographiics (425-251-8230), Ford Graphics (253-838-1913), Kestrel Blueprint (425-462- 0330), and Olympic Printing (206-622-6000) are just a few of the printing companies that provide this service. • Please provide one (1) colored (hearing/meeting display) copy of your revised site plan, revised landscaping plan and/or revised neighborhood detail map. You do not need to resubmit colored copies of these maps UNLESS you have altered them. Please use a 1/4" felt pen and the following colors: Red North Arrow, outer property boundary. Proposed new lot lines (dashed). Do not color existing lot lines which are to be eliminated or relocated. Black Street names identified with lettering of at least one inch (1") in height. Street names must be legible at a distance of fifteen feet (15'). Tan Existing buildings (Please do not color buildings which will be demolished or removed.) Yellow Proposed buildings Lt. Green Landscaped areas Dk. Green Areas of undisturbed vegetation PLANS AND ATTACHMENTS: I'Please fold all plans and attachments to a size not exceeding 8 1/2" by 11" for storage in a letter size folder. Authorization from the Development Services Division is needed for any revisions or additions to be submitted after the end of the environmental determination appeal period. REVISION.DOC REVISED 07/98 Revisions SAMPLE COVER LETTER January 1, 1998 Laureen Nicolay City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 Grady Way South Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Revisions to Lake View Apartments Site Plan City file#LUA-98-000-SA,ECF Dear Ms. Nicolay: The Lake View Apartments site plan application has been revised in response to preliminary concerns of various City departments. The density of the project has been reduced from 35 units per acre to 30 units per acre. We are also submitting a variance request in conjunction with this site plan application in order to allow construction of Building C within 25 feet the northern property line (City Zoning Code requires 35 foot setback from an arterial street). Attachments and revisions: 1. Application form--Attached are 11 copies (including the original) of a revised master application form. These should replace our previously submitted application forms. 2. Project narrative--Attached are 11 copies of a revised project narrative to replace our original. 3. Neighborhood detail map--No changes. Retain original submittals. 4. Site plan (sheet 1 of 4)--Attached are 11 copies and one colored copy of our revised site plan for replacement. 5. Landscaping plan (sheet 2 of 4)--Attached are 11 copies and one colored copy of our revised landscaping plan for replacement. 6. Grading plan (sheet 3 of 4)--No changes. Please retain original submittals. 7. Tree cutting plan and application--No changes to the application form itself, however, we have revised the plan map to include all trees with a caliper of 6"+. Replace our original tree cutting plan with these 11 revised maps, attached. 8. Traffic Study--New. This has not been previously submitted. If you have any questions regarding these revisions, please contact me at (206) 555-1234. Sincerely, George Smith Project Architect CITY OF RENTON <. __VELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION [------------ . LAN® USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION • ...PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note:. ff there is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: GERALD RIEKER & SOUNG HEE The Cambridge Apartments NAME: . PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 11017 101st Place NE 9th Place and Edmonds Avenue 2152.0 WE TrH PI✓ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: Kirkland , WA ZIP: 9 8 0 34 092305-9113.04- 092305-9109-00 TELEPHONE NUMBER: ( 2 0 6 ) 3 0 0-5 91 1 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Site is currently vacant APPLICANT (if other than owner} Zoning is RM-C PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: GERALD RIEKER & S 0 U N G HEE Proposed is a twelve unit apartment development with 21 parking stalls COMPANY(if applicable): Cambridge Homes NW EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center ADDRESS: 11017 — 101st Place PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Residential CITY: Kirkland, WA ZIP: 98034EXISTING ZONING: RM-C TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206)300-5911 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Same CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR AC A,�I NAME: Frank Heffernan AIA .OPMF-" P ' 26,156 s.f. ( .6 a c) Y OF REN ONNING PROJECT VALUE: Huu 1999 COMPANY (if applicable): Ferrari Design Group P.S. $750,000.00 R ECE-IV ED ADDRESS: 12277 - 134-th Ct. N.E. , #203 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Not that we are aware of CITY: Redmond, WA ZIP: 98052 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? Not that we are aware of. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425)821-3383 LEGAL DESC 'TION OF PROPERTY (Attach se ate sheet if necessary) (See attached legal) TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ i_ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ XX SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 1OOO. cc' FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ _ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge XX ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ C'C• ° REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name)5049h5't/cc- declare that I am (please check one) ' the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. rc� �.. J• C ./ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and Y J`�v/�'y/f'c '(. �'<"r•on•; ••QQ ,l for the State of residing at K Irk ici;.7ce .•t� a�•2 110 �✓ , on the day of (Na of—�-r�Ownef/Re rest ttiv ) (� _0°�CTARJA.•C� � is . * • —moo • * PUBLIC (Signature of Owner/Representative) '1 •.Q�,• �,2c$,• 5 '�, (Signature of N t ublic) (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number: Lk, Al jG A AAD BSP CAPS CAP-U CPA CU-A CU-H tlty, LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R RVMP SA-A SA-H SHPL-A SHPL-F1 SP SM SME TP V-A V-B V-H W TOTAL FEES: $ r ' S TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ 3.r.).. `` i( }) MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 •1 :Is LL 1- --/-7' 1.-- 14, () ...,, — ---1 i---- () 1 f.-- t— -h it L it ill c.. 1- ci-1 It to 7 ()1 , 1.0 (0 ..._-_:- --- IL r\ '3 oi 7 D c,\J 3 ___I .-- N % •<1 -"t A Z " — 1: -, it ,--1- ---7 L. der:----- ii--i ul 13 j - Z .# --- 4) "I g () 2:1 ) .1 . 1 - 0 X d) • °) 0.-- -1 a Z a 01 7t- ------3 -1- i--- I-- (17 -:•\.- 0 ci...)-A 0__ . ccf„li -(.17) `-) I-- () 7 CI I-- 0 c>' (T) -'7":73 F.- :Jo, -23 oi -7 it - , 0 i I-- ."--- f--- z la I- 11-1-E‘ ' (C) V- ' o I- "- 7 11- 3I— ti LI- 4) q) 4) C), (f)) 4 IL t(-- , e- a\ i - I - -I '- ' /t: " . f II °). b (I) id in (f) (Y. cl) if) 0) ''D 0 Ili ( ) C) c-f.) 1 r\ - - 0 1-11 tY _),, D 16 w \t• -., \--/ 1-1- LI- _1 -,--f in ?.4-1- 0-1 itt 0 W 0-- 0 -E-3 0 fn. (L'. _,.i,cfl Z f_ ft '' ' ifl ro t- 0 pz 10 11--r _ 1 t' 1 i WI , . 11-.) _ 0 W AI -" •-- ‘ji i___ Z ) ill Eli 0-) 0 f_._ 1 III Z (0 II II 11 1.; 1---. . )-- fo, _I, (-, 1----- .__...._ tt_._ it --- 3= -3 z --.. Jf,1-1-- 111 -.-1 k-1) " k•-.) —1 . . CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS EDMONDS AVENUE N.E. & N.E. 9TH PLACE RENTON, WASHINGTON FDG NO 99121.00 PARKING, LOT COVERAGE, LANDSCAPING ANALYSIS Total site square footage 26,156 sf Existing impervious surfacing 0 sf Existing undeveloped area 26,156 sf Square footage proposed (total) 11,964 sf 1st floor 3,988 sf 2nd floor 3,988 sf 3rd floor 3,988 sf Footprint area of building 4,238 sf of lot covered by building 16.2% Total pavement square footage 8,843 sf Wetlands on site 0 sf Parking required 21 stalls (1.5 per unit plus .25 guest per unit) 1.5 x 12 + 12 x 0.25 = 21 Parking provided* 21 *includes one accessible stall Stall dimensions (minimum) 9'-0" wide x 20'0" long Landscaped area on site 13,075 sf 5'=0" width along R.O.W. at parking** 807 sf **part of 13,075 sf Interior parking lot landscape*** 0 sf ***not required for small lots (<10,000 sf) Allowable building height 35'-0" Proposed building height 35'-0" Required setbacks: 20'-0" front; 15'-0" rear; 12'-0" side Proposed setbacks: 21'-0" front; 15'-0" side and rear DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG � 1999 RECEIVED CAMBRIDGE APARTMENTS EDMONDS AVENUE N.E. & N.E. 9TH PLACE RENTON, WASHINGTON FDG PROJECT NO. 99121.00 PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed project involves the construction of a twelve unit apartment development on the subject site. The "Cambridge Apartments" is as noted above located in the 2500 block of N.E. 9th Place in Renton, Washington. The site is an approximately 26,156 square feet (.6 acre site) currently zoned RM-C (residential, multi-family, community center). Sites to the east are currently zoned RM-C; to the south R-8; to the West RM- I; and to the north RM-C. The site is currently vacant except for an abandoned carport on the northeast corner of the property. The slope of the site varies from 4% to 10% to the southwest. Soils types as identified in the geotechnical report accompanying this submittal are brown, medium dense, silty fine sand fairly uniform across the site. A storm drainage report and accompanying grading and drainage plans have been completed for this project and are included with this submittal. The following statistics are included in this narrative by way of detailing the scope of the "Cambridge Apartments": Lot Area: 26,156 s.f. (.6 acre) Building Footprint: 4,238 s.f. Building Area: 11,964 s.f. Parking area: 8,843 s.f. (21 stalls) % Coverage (by Building): 16.2% Impervious Area: 50% (13,081+26,156) (12)2 Bedroom Units: 997 s.f. each Building Height: 35'-0" (3 stories) Curb gutter and sidewalk along project frontage is proposed. Construction costs for the entire project are estimated in the range of $750,000.00 or $62.70 per square foot. The site will be cleared and graded as a part of the development of the project. A tree survey/removal plan has been prepared and accompanies this submittal. (4) 8" Cottonwoods, (1) 30" Fir, (1) 30" Alder, and (1) 24" Alder are to be removed. Quantities of grading and fill material are estimated on the grading plans developed for the project and attached to this submittal. While an existing utility easement 9'-0" wide (+) extends along the N.E. 9th Place frontage of the site, no further easements or dedications are proposed for the development of the project. All portions of the site not proposed to be covered by buildings or pavement (including sidewalk) will be landscaped per the Landscape Plan submitted with this application. FH1353/III DEVEOPMENT NToN 1NC CITY OF RE BUG G 3 1 RECEIV999ED CITY OF RENTON . . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. /CRTYrOF RENTON or; n3 1999 RECEIVE© A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1. Name of project, if applicable: The Cambridge Apartments 2. Name of Applicant: Cambridge Homes NW 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Gerald and Soung Hee Rieker Contact: Frank Heffernan 11017 101st Place (425) 821-3383 Kirkland, WA 98034 4. Date checklist prepared: July 23, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction to begin Fall 1999 Completion by January 2000 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Soils report, storm drainage analysis (attached). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Building permit application has been made to the City of Renton (Activity No. B990128) 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit, grading permit, street use permit, mechanical permits, electrical permit. 2 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Site size: 26,156 sq. ft. (.6 acres); development proposed is a 12 unit apartment complex with 21 parking stalls (covered) with associated site development and landscaping work. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related tot his checklist. The 2500 block of N.E. 9th Place, East of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 10% gradient sloping towards the west. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Refer to soils report attached. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be required to prepare site for construction - structural fill will be imported. Quantities and source to be determined. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. A T.E.S.C. Plan will be developed and adhered to during construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? It is estimated that 50% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. T.E.S.C. Plan during construction. All portions of site not building or paving will be landscaped upon completion of the project. 4 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Vehicle emissions from equipment during construction. Vehicle emissions from resident vehicles upon project completion. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Surrounding residential development and Interstate 405. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. No exceptional measures are proposed. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Lake Washington is located approximately 2 miles west of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Groundwater: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Project will connect to existing sanitary and storm sewer systems. No waste discharge to ground. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water from roofs and parking areas will be routed to City storm system per King County Development Standards. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Adherence to King County Development Standards regarding surface water management. 6 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation - blackberries b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Site will be cleared for construction and re-landscaped as part of project development. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See enclosed Landscape Plan. All portions of site not developed as building or parking will be landscaped. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site (see next page): Birds: hawk, heron, eagle songbirds, they Mammals: deer, bear, elk, er Rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: 7 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known to occur. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No exceptional measures are proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric: for heating and lighting and hot water. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Conformance with energy code requirements for insulation, heating, lighting and glazing. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so, describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services anticipated. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No exceptional measures are proposed or necessary. 8 b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Vehicular traffic from Interstate 405, surrounding arterials and residential developments. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term during construction - construction equipment. Long term - apartment residents and vehicle noises at completion of project. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No exceptional measures save limiting hours of construction to 7 a.m. - 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant; surrounding are residential uses, both single and multi-family. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is an abandoned carport on the northeast corner of the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? An abandoned carport will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Site is currently zoned RM-C. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential. 9 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not that we are aware of. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 25 persons. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. Design of project in conformance to City of Renton zoning standards. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. Twelve middle income units will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. No existing units would be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None required, project will add to existing affordable housing stock. 10 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Proposed maximum height will average 35'-0" above grade. Principal materials: wood bevel siding, asphalt, comp roofing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None that we are aware of. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Conformance with City design standards for the RM-C zone. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Building and site lighting (during evening hours) will be provided by the project. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Surrounding arterials and residential developments will produce light affecting subject property. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Strategic placement of fixtures and use of directional fixtures/shields. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Highlands Park occurs due south of the site. 11 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. None are proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None we are aware of. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None we are aware of. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site is served by Edmonds Avenue N.E., N.E. 9th and to the west, Sunset Blvd. and 1-405. . b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NOT KNOWN c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 21 parking stalls will be created. No parking stalls will be eliminated. 12 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Not that we are aware of. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Per ITE manual estimate for this use (general apartment). Weekday 6.63/DU x 12 units = 79.56 Assume peak volumes to be 6 - 8 a.m. and 5 - 7 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Conformance with City of Renton Development Standards/DNS Conditions. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. All the referenced public services would be required for this development consistent with developments of similar scale. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Conformance with City of Renton Development Requirements/DNS Conditions/Impact Assessments. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity & Gas: Puget Sound Energy Telephone: GTE Sanitary Sewer/Water: City of Renton Refuse: Rabanco/Waste Management 13 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Name Printed: SERA&-O Date: r(71-�/T"Y ` - r 5 T23N R5E E 1/2 _ .• —1"----— _ _ _ t R-8(} 1. \ (--NE 12th 5i,.1-- • 1 1 \\ram- Q � l . 1 R-8J t_xl1,L I L I — LUy -0-3-L-P- -,117 _,,IP. 900 - toP - yp FNr . -1 — R -I �� 0s a, 'NrON/yiVO 1 ,.\ 99 s RM- � .,,�I 9 t, ‘' a) - -1E�Oth .I RMTI I �Q i. -RM-c1 I S. _ RIM ; -NE 19th RM • 1, —I— = 1--11 I R81 1-1 ;l- _)- os -� - I—I I I R 81 - - cri vi a _� - N -r$tli I nt. 1 _ 1 I I T8 / 1 —�— R-8, .. .. �y _- _11_ V` l � R;8 lki _ w 1 N 8th• St. I i F- 1- "I' l p _ 8 I ' H \ I -W{''" ao I l RL.// \,. - . s7-- j/rit. , z,_13 - - z NICE' R-8 L �e H �_- -_ - %ff I H\ ; ; R�8 - h- i / ! -7- 1p /it.8'i,18 _ � —� - �' 1 F ° �_ _ H I 1 • ti �, = NE 5jth-, = Edmond I i \ \ \1( �W�nd �� R 8 �Fernda�1_ Q c, g R-� • Y \ l`I I _ F4 - 17 T23N R5E E 1/2 ? o .qa 1 4 ' �Y °O ZONING � 1t."oo �i G'.. P/B/P TECHNICAL SERVICES . �� W, ways* 8 T23N R5E E 1/2 • ,� NOTE KrdMaps t Wa°Orelero4CorA - E 1-23-5 RENTON 319E _ \. and FNNdSuvay/.Tl MsOla ralarwx•.w I I� b only end no warrant led or YndN A . - .—•—.—.—.—•—;— 7{•—'—•—N.E.—•---•�•—/2TH—•—•—•—ST— 1''Sj41 •. i slx.e 'M .A-0 ,1 A.A. I ere Ir. w I ` �••—••_ •/Is • •�•� II:12 q'+.a IC,2- no se, 'ef �p 012Kr•�' A B29 ®'•BIII> W i n q.{Ir$^}�1�'y T = 9 OJ2K. �•+.�+I�I IIfii W II 0 wI N I .y !D ... i II: I`` .�:2, 2 'AN Q no NI Q 1 l i. •Il11; r re r 42'st iJ II W f rl¢SP n-x _ n 0.J1 Ac: 14___ „re W /rr.sf J/./N iIAL I.JO Ac. it 14 .- it�_iom- --/a>_ rt., r,L./lf : i O.SfKN ,,, 27 q J I t -tl II _-� x,.11'^ '•:. [[iice� Ta.• 4 ' I i 1 • 10 94u 4 • 4 •• i i 0"' it [4 .4.1f.Nmfp�q ` : re . ". �..._)._I...�y,5�r5, t91.1/I •�.•.n r:: ryI1fJ1 I • 4w U ` re n! re Ow.It e J 8 if4 IZ 1161E ZW A'� II .l./Ss °;m4 f l' Y N -O./JAc, _ u 1� MI 'F�--� ►,I II.I/ -jt w ,� lIM/It0 f r.f./Jf e fft 13 ar. f - Z rf/ i E � 2 !J2}, I.l.lO :., TA ea m.N N i b .•. o t e 9.::.;. .,�+f-,.;• ir: - pK ; ;ourYe /�` 5 I00 Ui11TS1 - ., ., 4\ 110/0",tAA0361• .�Ias. _.M _--Jss. Q• Li ----co :: r/ -N NSSUNITS rUN ET,.;�1 I ;TS--� .1 �t401 t3 M ,-_ ,_ o (�� �AU-EL--HEIGHTS I i 1 '"' 'e� 5'01 ,x r CONDOMINIUM _ L . Iw` I > fl d d'13D.414 a. I`r___I „ram s. O / A C I A CONDOMINIUM O.iSAcs� : '\ .''R'f -' '©;ry_-- I I of/gc: 0 12111. 5 r.71 ! JENNIE OMAITS - Li • i, �'rn I 1,� Z ,. • s 10TH PL.s• 7., `c. '4 B 2 I ' 1 W rl:a tea' >: I ,-4, •,,I',�7 41 JOHN 1.. _ e� ae I I o� :m® _e 0 i... ;CI L1 -�a14' ZANATTA ' r A ,. uJ R0A0 Ac. 11 2 ;CI 1Q® (nns r i • W 'N f a c Jr do .li"� r- I.0K. . e 11 ,�r� 1 rc 1 _vs-.• N.E. 10TH PI_.,L s Q . :.(1,', A CONDOMINIUM �( V Q %J.IJ �2nw1 . �+ �1 T f.l)n •27,1 /s/ 34 for ,77 I, I Ifre r[42 :'N, l• }Ie_-�s}1 �ry�J v .� 160 UNITS -� --t xr,,,S `77-' (� 'lJ ®� , 4A ®0.43 Ac r _-�J �� CCLC 033 Ac.4 3 g ,�7.� / �� ,•� RI.( �- /ya Q3JK°219. MN WAS )J �•I R +a _ W4M,bJee S [1 h e N.E. IOTH "' ST. co : 6/ . CO A n rr4 1,I. "2 5 ^ � N III v 1` r s f-J x 18 Z •yy �,a . I ',� '`raorJ-s C',<'IC D1O t7'M In gs���,= 7�f�'Iq I--: § I061 8 _____ Q __-_ir_ l,l 6�2p 4 , 10^ II`• ID 13- 4dlw`15 16 11117 19 �955 0 iiii w = ssasf beQ.}< we isI>y ; W 0 0 jç / / wC �s 1 , a3� 6 9 �y 1 4 IS 16,"�{7,��S.0 RDE�J S �. � rr�] � � ;t J �5 ,� 91 x,.�l k 9TN n ' 4P :,1J� .... ...: `2p I III. _ Z Z 6 k �' o.so AC N W 2 ,� 4` ,S N f$ T� a ��,°. 1T h y1 495.3E Z I w: r ,r1m ssn u.0 f aj 13�2 x L C �`,.,ri„J.J, t— ,0I ®4rs.) `. r..., - •r 77SSTT, •tst v,/ e,I 4• S 1•1 9,J Ti�11r1/-���1. r 2+L A4 22. 2I 20 D 16 I7, 16 K MO o ZV (J Reryrfi0re ,r !\ -Fs I r 2 ff� Cf]tr j5liP I ,. m O T ftqq_JL__J, 1;9 S J _ 14 ' m D m Er 41 c. gs • r Y N.E. J ott I , 9TH ST, s rJ f R•c. > ,Z W,, fr ® I . S 2�;Jlr: S, t-1 y41i* a• i N Z7 Z -. •4 1 0�EN. r[�_ I I. Z ,- ,. S .• „.o,iir ■=; i '3 i 2 4r • s 8TH PL. A T.i gin �7'4`� i1L�_' 1 y 2ox00 «J, i)i • Y.J eY �1ie fL• I ci a 7 � La i :71,4 a� J Q Y5��t*�1v 'R7 W�!R� -2 2 � W Jr Eat V 2 Yl'•ii ,64.7.5 eat, N. �9%�' _ .a• 5. s s '. , o Irr�aisijjE 1 �•8T/y S 9 cfi+ S c. /,a 6 I ] L'�L�',` P-11 1A1 a.- 1` V 3? _._.— Gal Itv q 7 r > N. 8TH ST. N a `R ` • � C ;a r� I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3AND4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 ................ .... ....... . Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Floor Plans 3 ANo 4 Geotechnical Report2ANo3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site Landscaping Plan, Conceptual4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 ........ ......:............ ............................. Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 Tree CuttingNegetation Clearing Plan 4 Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived byP �OPMENTP 1(I �4M (t A V5 1. Property Services Section CITY OF REN NAME: tt 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section All 0 1999 DATE: ALJG-vg. , VRV? 4. Development Planning Section RECEIVED `CI�C ED h.\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls 07/28 99 08:17 FAX 206 628 56-- CTI UNIT 2 002 ` CAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMA_,, 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, ;701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 Policy No.: 537285 STANDARD OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE A Amount of Date of Policy: MARCH 26, 1999 at 1:32 PM Insurance: $124,950.00 1. Name of Insured: GERALD L. RIEKER AND SOUNG HEE RIEICER D LO MENT P! A k i Ty OF RENING NTON 0 3 1999 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is: R AUGUG FEE SIMPLE �'��� 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: GERALD L. RIEKER AND SOUNG HEE RIEKER, HUSBAND AND WIFE 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION • CHICAGO'IT LE INSURANCE COMPANY ALrAorA/-W IIrcc 07/28/99 08:17 FAX 208 628 58"' CTI UNIT 2 003 • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • PolicyNo.: 537285 STANDARD OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE A (COntiaucap LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE WEST 75 FEET OF THE NORTH 160 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1S0 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8005270551. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TEE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE S EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN XING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CCRNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 0°13'50" HEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 180.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'10" WEST 85.88 FEET TO INTERSECT A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 75 FEET EAST MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 180.67 FEET; THENCE EAST 86.08 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 10 FEET AS CCNVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6005270551. • • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 07/28/99 08:18 FAX 206 628 5607 CTI UNIT 2 UO4 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Policy No.: 537285 STANDARD OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees or expenses) which arise by reason of GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A_ Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments, overlaps,boundary line disputes,and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. D. Any lien,or right to lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers'compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which arc not shown as existing hens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. G. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, includinv easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights,claims,or title to water. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. RESERVATICNS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND TF RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR GROUND OPERATIONS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING T SAME. RECORDING NUMBER: 342731 2. DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ALTAON! 07.28/99 08:18 FAX 206 628 5697 CTI UNIT 2 005 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Policy No.: 537285 STANDARD OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE B (Coutinued) • MNIMMIMNIIMMW AMMO SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS GRANTOR: GERALD L. RIMER AND SCUNG HEE RIEXER, HUSBAND AND WIPE TRUSTEE: NORWEST FINANCIAL CORP., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: FIRST SAVINGS BANK OF WASHINGTON AMOUNT: ummimmemme DATED: MARCH 17, 1999 RECORDED: MARCH 26, 1999 RECORDING NUMBER: 9903261418 LOAN NUMBER: NOTYDISCLOSED ** SND OP SCIIiEDQLE E ** AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY Loan Policy Endorsements: 6.1 Owner's Policy Endorsements: NONE • • • • CH.ICAGOTITLE INSUR rkE COMPANY 07/28/99 08:18 FAX 206 628 5697 CTI UNIT 2 006 • your referenceV IEKER ENDORSERIENT Attached to and forming a part of Policy No. 5372185 Issued By CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Dated: March 26, 1.999 • • • • • • • • • • • I /9'n'K/fie q'1 - 113 } DRF!/F"IT1'9EDEP7 MEMORANDUM JAN0 2 1998 DATE: I p 1147 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: I ►.'i1 r JS' e'X'? /ti , '9 t7/, LOCATION: 5X X )D N 1; G/ Pi .• v( Fier dCJ A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for //.'o 7 , Thursday, 12(4.Gl/1/\f in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to P1Z at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. e0rnmt /6" 1 zJ/- V VO ��G �1 _ ,I CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DEC 3 1 1997 ,uiwiwca DIVISION DATE: OP 1 l 0 7 TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: I J Uri OY) ci i f7/. LOCATION: d X X 1 DC N1% PI .j &O- OF i a jE A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for // at) , Thursday, 114_4- l-'Y\j /',' - in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to pita,4 at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. • //-�/7 1`SY O A �a ; CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: January 2, 1998 TO: Mark Pywell, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal '1 SUBJECT: NE 9th Pl. 12 Unit, 2500 Blk. NE 9th Pl. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 2500 GPM, which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and two additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarm and sprinkler system installation. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$4,656.00 is required based on $388.00 per unit. 4. Provide an unobstructed fire department access from the parking lot to the apartment building at each entry. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Harold Friebe Proposed Apt.'s 2500 Block of NE 9th PL. E/O Edmund's Ave.NE Pre-Application January 15, 1998 Development Services Review By Clinton Morgan(425) 277-6216 . GENERAL ITEM: See attachment for City of Renton drafting standards. Show City of Renton typical detail drawings applicable to the project. WATER: 1. Only a 4-inch water line is available in NE 9th Pl. for service. This would need to be replaced with a larger line to get the required fire flow determined by the Fire Department. 2. The proposed project is located in the Highlands 435 pressure zone. 3. The project is not in the Aquifer Protection Area. 4. One(1) fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. 5. There is a System Development Connection charge of$510 per unit. 6. A conceptual utility plan for the site and/or SEPA submittal to include main locations, sizes, valve locations and hydrant locations. 7. If building is over 30-feet in height a backflow prevention device may be require on the water service. SEWER: 1. A sewer line is available on NE 9th Pl. 2. The System Development Connection charge is $350 per unit. 3. Project located on quarter section map W 9-23-5. 4. See attachment for other various fees that may occur to the project. 5. Side sewer to have a minimum slope of 2%to right-of-way line. 6. Minimum pipe size is 6-inches. 7. Provide a surface cleanout 5-feet in front of building and show invert elevations. STORM DRAINAGE (Surface Water) 1. System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface area, (but not less than$385). 98CM002.DOC\ 2. See attachment for available city storm lines. 3. Surface water control must meet or exceed the requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements. Use 1990 Design Manual. A conceptual Drainage Report is required. Indication how any applicable Core Requirements or Special Requirements would be addressed. See attachment for content list. 4. Base map must use the NAVD 1988 datum. 5. Topography of the entire site and minimum of 30-feet outside the property is required to be shown on the plans. 6. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator CB or adequate biofiltration system. 7. Provide erosion/Sedimentation Control Plans. TRANSPORTATION: 1. Mitigation fee for transportation is $75 per new trip generated. Trip generation is determined by the 11'E Trip Generation Manual, 5th edition. 2. Roadway improvements required to City of Renton Standards which includes but limited to curb, gutters, sidewalk and two(2) street light to city standards on NE 9th PL. a) Sidewalk width 6-ft. located next to curb. b) Pavement width is 32 feet curb to curb. Note: Half street improvements is required for full length of property frontage to NE 9th PL. 3. All electrical and communications facilities for the project to be underground. 98CM002 98CM002.DOC\ CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Mark R. Pywell, AICP SUBJECT: 12 Units on NE 9th Place Pre-App97-113 We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the proposed development. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. 1. The subject property is zoned RM-C (Residential Multi-Family -- Suburban Center). The density allowed in this zone is 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre. The project will need to comply with the development standards for this zone. A copy of these standards is attached for your review. 2. Your application states that the subject property is 25,928 sf in area. The proposed development would be a three story apartment building with a total of 12 units. This represents a density of 20 dwelling units per acre. This is the maximum density allowed in this zone. 3. Apartment buildings need to provide 1.5 parking stalls per unit and 0.25 guest parking stalls per unit. The 12 unit apartment complex needs to provide 21 parking stalls. The project description indicates that 22 parking stalls will be provided. This is one over the Code required parking. The project needs to be limited to 21 parking stalls or submit a request for a deviation from the parking standards for the one additional parking stall. 4. An administrative site plan and a SEPA checklist will need to be submitted for this project. Once an application is accepted as complete, it will take approximately 6 to 8 weeks to complete the review of the project. 5. A separate demolition permit is necessary for the demolition of the existing garage. 6. Any proposed signage should be shown on the site plan. A separate sign permit will be required after site plan approval for the installation of the signs. 7. Landscape plans, elevations, and floor plans will need to be submitted as part of the site plan application. A copy of the site plan application and requirements is attached for your use. 8. The setbacks shown on the plan submitted are equal to or greater than the minimum setbacks established for this zone. 9. A separate pedestrian walkway connecting the building with sidewalks along NE 9th Place should be considered in order to separate pedestrian and vehicular circulation. 12 Unit Apartment Page 2 Pre-Application 97-113 January 15, 1998 10. The maximum building height allowed in this zone is 35 feet. 11. This project site is across the street from property zoned R-8, Single Family Residential. Special Design Standards as described in Section 4-31-8F will be applicable to the project. The applicant may want to incorporate a combination of shrubs and a berm to help screen the parking area. 3 97113MMO.DOC CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 12, 1998 TO: Mark Pywell FROM: Rebecca Lind e C6v STAFF CONTACT: Owen Dennison(425) 277-2475 SUBJECT: 12 Units on NE 9th Place Preapplication- Strategic Planning Comments (25)0 block of NE 9th P1; east of Edmonds Ave NE) 1. ,Intent of the land use designation The site is designated Center Suburban(CS) in the Comprehensive Plan. The City's mixed use centers are envisioned to be pedestrian oriented places that provide a visual and physical focal point for the surrounding residential area. Uses in the Center should be developed at sufficient intensity to maximize efficient use of land, to support transit use and to create an urban district. Multi-family uses are intended to be integrated into Centers. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The proposal is generally consistent with the following policies intended to guided development in the Center Suburban land use designation. Policy LU-97. Encourage multi-story office, commercial, and multi family uses. Policy LU-108. Vehicular circulation should be internal and access to adjacent streets should be consolidated. Policy LU-109. Vehicular access to the site should be from a principal arterial street with the number of access points minimized. Policy LU-111. Site plan designs which locate parking lots associated with commercial uses, apartments or other uses behind or adjacent to structures are encouraged. Discourage parking lots from locating between structures and street rights-of-way. Policy LU-119. Suburban center sites and structures should be more intensive in design and intensity (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and set-back; landscaping; parking) than with land uses outside the Center. Policy LU-123. In order to achieve a balanced mix, multi family uses are intended to be integrated into the Centers. Residential density should be 10-20 dwelling units per acre. New residential only structures may be limited in order to encourage a 50%commercial/office mix within the Center. Density is 15.1 units per net acre according to the preapplication information. \\TS SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-H:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\PREAPP\CS\12UNITS.DOCbd January 12, 1998 Page 2 Objective LU-R: Create a buffer at the boundary of Centers to protect adjacent less intensive land uses from the impacts of urban activities within the Center. Policy LU-113. Buffers may be a combination of a. less intensive land uses, b. open space (not parking lots), c. structural elements, d. landscape features, e. fencing, and f other features which meet the spirit and intent of these policies. The Site Plan shows a 27' to 30' landscaped setback from the street. Landscaping in this area should provide a screening function to provide a visual separation from the more intense Center uses on the north side of N.E. 9th Place from the single family uses on the south side. 3. Areas of Possible Inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-102. Site and building design and use should be oriented primarily toward pedestrian/ people to maximize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use for circulation within the center. Pedestrian orientation should be increased through installation of a sidewalk along N.E. 9th Place and a connection to it from the building access points. 4. Advisory Policy L U-291. Beautification and screening of parking lots should be encouraged through appropriate landscaping,fencing and berms. (Community Design policies) Landscaping should be sufficient to screen the parking lots from adjacent properties on the west and south. H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\PREAPP\CS\12UNITS.DOC **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/03/99 16 : 13 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9903789 Amount : 1, 513 . 53 08/03/99 16 : 13 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 5365-HEFFERNAN Init : CRP Project # : LUA99-109 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 092305-9109 Site Address : 2520 NE 9TH PL Total Fees : 1, 513 . 53 This Payment 1, 513 . 53 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 513 .53 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 13 . 53 161( • STORM DRAINAGE REPORT FOR JEFF RIEKER EDMONDS AV. &NE 9TH PLACE RENTON, WASHINGTON STORM DRAINAGE REPORT FILE NO. 917-006-981 PREPARED BY TOUMA ENGINEERS 6632 SOUTH 191ST PLACE, SUITE E-102 KENT, WA. 98032 (425)251-0665 January, 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLAN:IING CITY OF RENTON AUG 0 3 1999 RECEIVED 3 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The project involves one parcel of land of about 0.6 acres. The property is located North of the City of Renton in the NW Quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M. It is bounded on the South by NE 9th Place, on the East and North by appartment.iildings,and along the West boundary exist single family parcels. Access to the property will be via NE 9 , along which street improvements will be made, see plans. The project area slopes from 4%to 10%to the Southwest. According to the USGS , see soils map, the site is made up of Ragnar/Indianola soil,which is generally fine sandy loam over olive-brown loamy sand. The existing ground cover consists of scotch broom, grasses,and a few large trees. Not any upstream areas contribute to the runoff from this site. 41 , ' Ali 4iii 414— to 46 f, ii, o' ii i ii 1' $ tia 1 '0 —Z--..-COPYRIGHT 1991 geoH140:57,F.Ai,I•0, --- ----,--- -----------SI f-6g---\'-'"-11--- • in ..,s,‘ /.Z' ,„ ,-- - : '•.-At; r" s ---I-•- .63 g: k .-• . - 4.,•--1400A 4 .-.. •• 6900.i a ikao - -- ' ... ,•^4 ri .-, - oilv. ,g,,.,...-.',,0*..r • io. c.‘ i- §, ;,... t, too 4- . ;:--.,1.• z y--A , .. • 1... el ...•• 1,fr I, .11, _, I` 82rss; 4‘41-',--9,:z. -; : .. ''' , 4\ j> .:12 Nr -I 4 TA s';'. PA H1.7-4. '''' Av sE ..... , .. . 61 !,...,.E _ 2 443. AY So, ;P . ‘.:(, 1 r At7.3;°----7-iS''''. -. * r • 1 1 g I pi,I-. L.V46k. .IS." .-,• r n i}; ,, ti F,--, ;c', h' •-'1 i , , v'''s•ti. A 4 I • '611i ,.., •='' 1-,,-)"-"I 14,°6 es,,, ,.- c...) L AI s-111-1 ,'• '' _ V"' ,,,,... ''' ..F ' il -• .,,,,..,,,,, "qv..,4516,,,.i4----.7, 7-7 I--,,,,.. ., ..,. r, ..,...., 1_ : ----- '• 'F• *win b •,,, 44:4"1 II,...vr • :, ' ,-.• ,. ,:1 /I v,...,. • ,r, ,..., , AV . .. .__. r 't• -1.- 114 ''''''1, ..,.4,,.N ' v..71,.s•',i I I r• .s. '' •-. .7k!..1*....... ; . t tA ,.1• C- . ,../N,N., Ano Ay --MOO 3 1131,H1.. tRi i •-- - • i , ......- ,.. g:E• ,,,,,11 . a 'kb -IireittEZIOMIN _ ________ IV 1.' -Ed- - I 2 4‘,.N.%96TH AV S . P,• - - v. ,,,gl 416-1• i ,,, .....la l... •.';-1-4•4'-_,• - NOS.1 . ....., . ." e '-'--- x t ilLS \\\ i •— -- '' Fl a . _ : at aa -- NUNN.- _ ' PARK AV ImE Illrgi 4'i a _.-' I I I . . NNW --' I t 4 ,oi ---'-'-' _L31'11‘6 S I 72 4 P • 4 P AV '.'"....,,,,,tr, _ A' 1,4' .11' 0 at*,.../ 21300.s.,.. lei 3300 3600 g 6\11 CD •• -9.4, ,---..- iN•••• ''..,t ,,,,, I-1„ 1- ill 6.. . AD' FRa i I-WC!_ /!,.._ILL - a NEADOw 4 AV _ 4 co ..,,,t,,,,,,Pi.t.! ....de 1/11."7" - - ----- -.• Iwo.40,,iii-6 -7...x 1•$ AV WWI Pi _ • :111111garomisimma,4,0NE Pra. [I,6 * ____34 -\'. ')Vf‘' • :‘,-,—TV OS -*VV. ' - l's\' VZ..1) For 1:*TH ::5,--, • • ' ...„.„, i E• . -A •c5,,:\ NE --: ...•I is m /tr. 4 I'Im .1.2,,,. Pip g ,,4,,, --..irk .,•/,, ik 00 1 oammilltat, VA inyr '-'i\,- ,.y.: ON ILA:,r I 110TH AV SE os,..1. -NE. Cli a iit NLZERDBIA"t4INE i• rTA;Wi AV JIM 1. -1(X lc, irn* • lc) . I i tip 27.1M.Tin L.k et , A i-41.0.0% ,,r.,,,,,- -,,,-----i 8 Cr-iimim t4 st mos 4;AV NNEA 414-AE-0,s.IS' C5) • (' Is ], , ,s•- ''....113TH P ,-,,k, 4',_!, IS V IA 11411. N. st ....14. _ .... .. •) ---- OAYTON N+ A' -l'.IE 1 3 4 4r-7 41-8 t I- 51%). Vt.", ' g i .: ‘. _ rn EDMONDS aa a isnikiA 51 . s r __ , •.,. , . 4' 11.1c,1"4.1 !Id;1 1161111. i'''I'E AV '• ;WI rilliPrr '1%8 ZOO°=..dna --w-zum r- i .----— -Ni. ,c4.. .0600 -----800.0 sr-Ter-,T.tlemt-sa---------7200 'Z., 1 1 ; .41. p waiiim....f _ ... G-r,...,N i.1 i Av § r ss_4 4 eg . AV•Ml , 1.,,,!a 14e1 W . 118TH ••IA 4.___41 ...0 .4.1.) a ;•I,r. l 1 r Av .A,... 1111$1110011„ , II ,r. it. ,,• 4 .., 0. .... ,. v.. 4.. --• i)02 . .1 is . .1-- AR g'.W1 L4itexx Av il '"'xi-g-72 ' _-.• 4,4,1 101.11 p ii g q i #..-•- ..,y ..,i •-• ITV 44 W.4., JEFFEFILSIEONPLI ' ... • . 1 . ....' '..,• al` A NE -"' 41/5 -- \ ......•S Tit 4 2,-k" . ' frolkil:6114 2../9‘. •ei- - gli ...f...-.,r„s, s, . i&\ KIRK .% M.ellIrt, "iri -Wrl 1117 VIEMIllr As, NE 4 \ 'A'... / pow...ti t:,', EYNIA1000 wooAVNE „4ce ii ,.'..:1;m .E T h-.-.1.21--2lS2NNr O,PSiAEgV 4IitsS L-tilf itiisrro /.e..-•1 -''''1' -A PK PM NE A Is v. I!" Ir,,4:4A4;t111..r$ . l . * in,.. 14 • 11,' 00/ ti- 8 n e,' __- --,s--,_ii zs-g -- 1. ..1. t :, •• 1 . .....:?' 4 --- 1 illa cg,1`0,4:1,1' .', 1.1' ..,=1,2 atii, ,, i ,, 1 PIRG 4 , 4. r--- lit§ 3C` .. • .- 3 •••••• . W '" M •35 - t.' c„, .,. • r2,', , .iirigi - .„,,, ,„ „, i i_ __ ,.., ,!,2,_• s,n , is •i 4'.' ^-, 7 , ' '..--.0‘,‘ e'p • 1 n-i-eix 1 ,, Pi 4,-; , IR W.:. n .. - '..!.. & „-- . •• I k'S s ,r " i *- -a A . n '0, 8 12941 1114i r, 103 ;... . S A) • .A•St V Z. sii el ....13.9±......... R.A , -, Sry r , 11003'6 3" '` a SWUM AV 4 AV S.PE i II 0k. Ai kt .e. 1 5 . 6' I I, ', S . ----... { "4,., a -. 4 4, .- i . - .......i.Al' I Atada A ,A, A ..,:., il-....1_ .,. ,r.A A P.m 4 eqp...11V5.4. , • 1 AS.....0N ct 1.1 V , 1, ,. ?lIlliOPPIPIPIP' „.., NEIcAst, a IMP.Ail IF 1-•wpm, R......!-- ' 1 t VA3110, ma,if .11•44 t/,' „Irt/tik‘ I ---, AS A' • 'fr,-1....',---__ 4124 <1 1,1,110.4'e Cr NE ) .' 8 iTipet-±Y-1--' E I IN gja_411/5Th ,A TI, C.•i s "."7"4 . ...-'--".••• Tis..44, V.314 ,...s.* _ ,AV NE 0., qb t-0 .1......;,:4°_1_, ------.....- ----4' air-Lai Ci 4 Sei• 0 iseNem IA __46.0 0 = ANAcoA.E3 :mat • -tkr ' . ---,1V-1111 1 \.I.,!. •-• S' r_t t. 0• ,,,,/ A -F- '7, , k-r—s DIP!', NE_ 03.... "ETU1_ ., Al'111 ;it I ir 1771111 IS li,7: , -4-,ty. .A,0 tz<4••"---r\:11 ::.• C I 38TH 4 ''t AV .,. s . 4).• - IS V C> ; 1 I in f, I COOVALE AV/ 1 1 !, 138TH m A . .,,. illialiat AV 1 S g h'' 1 lark ---- 140TH , is' i .. ...... • ... _ ,...., I.-, 4 -^:.. -• : t.-,••r -f ,'A ,,, 'all r -...- ,1 —L5:4=4. P 4 w z:,.. c,„MI! .4.•S igl- . e -4,.tx, .6 If;_ i.,.., 4 At-l• ''-'1 .' -'4. g 5. ;- 1" 1/ , ' •Ort 6 , 4 ,,,, .,_.• _ 1410 AV 10 * ''' Z `Z. ''-' i 0, 4).- 15..,. 1 •*> %. V 41 Se , 4,-. AV Ir i . • c•,, :;,-. -li,e'; '...,41•4 A W, 4 ,,„..„,7CS A 4 /. ION Aw . 146TH1XAV SE I • -1 . ...,J 1451_11 s § 5 ' 1 ., •-• :'-' ' •-• il, g v 2—-- II-- '...........1,:r• r i 14 aig 1\-) t• mu.4. ... . , 41.W111,1,9. E IS, -,4 ,,, . f' ..': NibN :,,'5: — . 1 ---I i 1 4 I"iiit AY>I 5. -1 41111111111.111111 I— ,.. ,.."..' V A al Ln 4. 4'' IMIIIINEIM1111 N, . . L39 FWIVIstri3ra dV14 . 33S d T 7 RigrAtritill/0:1'11 .. . •........ .- . —.,....,........,.....,.... . ...... ...,....,..;.,:.W.1.a,..,,, 1•0111 is '', •\\*4-4. /iiiiiiiiiii:::,:::.::::.: ::::::.E.: \ ow • �,`', s � I-T� ■. �'XSId' �, •tom' - � . { I' r r�•, i•� Suosta L i. m_ \r F , �, I 1 Ur �j \� f ' � , �`'1.. �!.J „ - II 1! ::..,-le,* ,..!. • • • I ?i '•�♦ . Ir-1 �.. 1 .O. '(` ' I f, •�� c��•Y'.),:.�. B1tic River t ( E`�1 tr �' It , , i iwt. f...... -or - ��• I Q gc ri'!j — 1 Athletic 1,��; 4Ir r 9F ( •• '-- k � 1, ; Ubsta' •d ` 1111111�j 'n Field ,,�©,C: �`� r Th 1 11 - •L'� 1 11% O �iAkE!EvD' _I„....)!--_ r pre Lt \ 1PA*=-- 1.I,l..*l..,.• • . ,BeD id n i"im kri® `V ,04.-M,„,1,. --'AAttiAP) / `� tO;i F BM • . -l• •-•-:• ': =aseb'etf/ g'' Cemi yvC LSel, Park 'GRAVE PIT 1_ /� *VW"; I ket � � ' -,al"BeD :-.. .� ��� �_ '� I1. _�� t P \ , ttcnilir itril it P ads . • 76 ;AkF _� ; - c 5 R ROAD Tp •� 1 �� -• .... ... \ I 'f tt. 0�0 -7 ,t ..�P,40f ti � • i/ • I ( ,I - l+ ���, aC� q �% Wo Q �> klk .� ^\ � :I0L `4 ).` \--_.i•• _ - - I� II" r I . AkF 1.e.�.'� wo T �a s— ` —.ram`_ ^• Nal I !I�t • .___-.... 6 37-- "- AkF N Course5t�h Am4cf: ; \j \ AgC �`�ar ''�� - �� IUr I = IP • • el. \ -. ate!�e»__ 1 t3M ' AGolf - --.\kil . 4 .: ' '•I \ Wit::-- ::: a`I 30%'� , Sew. ORj1IE... _„�' ;�_ 1 .0 • ----•I" - ;\<',yO';`Q ,r I , - �' 1=' `\ \ ' Oise• ��5. PP-. `' • \; _ A,s�y I : \\ .• i `, Ao ,r, O � V., _ Subata \. Ir. ` 'try --- tirool \IP7/410°,1.-....- tttl i.. /,- II 3j21 I t. A, \ '11/1-----''s%II, * \ . ,, F ; . \t Lon acre$ - • u , 41-Wr / •,/ / --.7r,'-,-,,,11 l Fr, Aau,41, n �.Ii d• :••� I eC l 1 405 r'I Ur-'a'_ ,--'�iI Y' Ur ti,_, I ` Wo U �w 'ii• [.--;,;.. .X\ : �27'30"-: • -- --U , lI3f7I! -4EL C4 ".'t ==', ,..r. 11,,,, \.:\, ••••&':. . = '''1 2 W Pu . .yF"' ..-..s r. 'g' ., St / 1� J/7/ 4 II. CORE REQUIREMENTS Core Requirement#1. -Discharge at the Natural Location The developed site runoff will collect in the bioswale,from where it will flow to the existing storm drain under Edmonds Ave. Core Requirement#2. -Offsite analysis See section III,this report. Core Requirement#3. -Runoff control Water quality protection is required due to 8000 sf of new parking, see section IV. However, runoff detention is not required because the 100 year peakflow increase is less than 0.5 cfs. Core Requirement#4. -Conveyance system Design The storm drainage system consists of catch basins and pipes, which have been checked for peakflow capacity. It has been found that their capacity far exceeds the expected 100 yr. peakflow. The roof runoff will be conveyed in 6"underground pipes. See Section V of this report for calculation of pipe capacities. Core Requirement#5. -Temporary erosion and sedimentation control Temporary erosion and sedimentation control shall consist of siltfences, a construction entrance, filter fabric over storm grates, and mulching. See plans. Core Requirement#6. -Maintenance and operation Maintenance involves having on-site catch basins cleared from sediments when necessary. Core Requirement#7. -Bonds and liability N.A. Special Requirement# 1. -Critical drainage areas N.A. Special Requirement#2. -Compliance with an existing Master Drainage Plan(MDP) N.A. Special Requirement#3. -Conditions requiring a MDP.N.A. Special Requirement#4. -Adopted basin or community plans N.A. Special Requirement#5. -Special water quality controls.N.A. Special Requirement#6. -Coalescing plate oil/water seperators N.A. Special Requirement#7. -Closed depressions N.A. Special Requirement#8. -Use of lakes, wetlands or closed depressions for runoff control N.A. Special Requirement#9. -Delineation of the 100 yr floodplain N.A. Special Requirement#10. -Flood protection facilities for type 1 and type 2 streams N.A. Special Requirement#11. -Geotechnical analysis and report N.A. Special Requirement#12. -Soils analysis and report N.A. 5 III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS In existing conditions, the site surface runoff collects in a Type II catch basin at the intersection of 9t place and Edmonds Av. A 15"concrete pipe then leads 500' South to 9th St. The water is then conveyed 1000' West thru an 18" concrete pipe under 9th St. Then the runoff flows 600' South to 7th St. in an 18" concrete pipe, and from there to the storm drain system along Sunset Blvd. Eventually the water flows into Lake Washington. IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ASSESSMENT 1. AREAS SUMMARY-WHOLE PROPERTY TABLE 1 : BASIN AREAS AREA SQUARE FEET ACRES CN DRAINAGE BASIN 25,970 1.93 DEVELOPED BASIN: Roof,Patios 5310 0.31 Parking, Access 8620 0.10 Total Impervious 13,930 0.32 98 Landscaping 25,970— 13,930 0.28 80 = 12,040 Total 25,970 0.60 EXISTING BASIN: Impervious 0 0.00 98 Meadow 25,970 0.60 78 Total 25,970 0.60 TABLE 2 : PEAK FLOWS CFS EXISTING DEVPD. 100 YR 0.19 0.48 10YR 0.10 0.33 2YR 0.03 0.20 Because the 100 yr. peakflows differ less than 0.5 cfs, detention is not required per core requirement 3 in the King Co. SWDM. KING COUNTY, WASIIINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.28 SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOG C SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A (B C D Cultivated Iand(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 () 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 6_4 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 85 90 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 01 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and Industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. 3.5.2-3 2/89 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-I1OUR ISOPLUVIALS • : -01 -''' '---- -- - ' --- --- .- --'c---1 dip!' \144 .4 A 17 tty AirgeN, to ig191-1 iip ., r -, ,, .75*,T41 , , _ ..,.1, 0. , 11 itille 1 , 11 MIL 1 ‘14:‘ —v4 ''' P 2 1 • / liiiiihripp I- _ifprixf...ti.-- 1,1, 11N0, i " • -R ''' ---A-t-,.. '''.1 .' .."z ,i ___,1..' ‘;''' Iff A rmiL 20,- : 1 )fii 2Q ' tkkitOrit4*40011:0 SOA-IIP‘19kli' 4 4 co , .,____. ,4i416 *if , ' „.Altib., ', _ f„ 1. i ESl "-,� 11i1 j 4 '�r /" \cat,": ■I lk /± �l i. .011b 0*0 ii I , ; ^- Orfilr 't iliars 7 Wit. ."4'' ( I0 ‘.4 ON`� II} l4lk! OM. 0 - Ihikt V (. it. . t Ilk . - 1 r ilk343 . / fT,—IL h_lN\ \ 7—:.....T.m. ii . , •., -A- . ;4 p . . am \ \i\ _ - ti 77 • - i'-j' . /J — 14---1 + 1 r II11��tI.,,•_r 04k W ''ram `1� ��_t1 • 1i6' \ t \s i i (-- :. II ' PI-xi\ es i . ' i\.4\ -: \\t‘t .1 `CS / 4- ---- ir,.."1 , , - '\A , ar.- .. --.-. glit protN1 jiligiii. ' ..._. ; ,.,,, 7„ . ., ... „ ,......, .„ .:, . , .,,,.„'= pi ._.... + � ID i ow, 4,, , N4.JJjF #$ L-4/41 ..,..._ II t ---\,. r __ e,.....„.,:r. 4.4.... ...7.7!• /- \e- "":-.— F rot !,_ _.. ,. cv . At.), ..; !ital.. . ,li j d kirrof . . ' cy4.\- .41,0, .7-4111..illy._ ____ . '• vr'' ' bril titer ‘r,' i : k , if \ _ , ArArAtillil 4 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION • ail, -TOM -r, 0.3.4�' ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR et; rf�, F TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES ry�-� _Iy- - Illr 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 Mlles A, � , . 1:300,000 3.5.1-8 1 KING COUNTY, W AS HINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL • FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 2 2 \ VI 1 1R:V4M g 415 A ‘ , •m—— ,1 0111 i ittir ra---Nlifigik A% . __, wilk_,,,o, ' 2.3.___, ) 24 i 0611wp t ti Ar, lk* �+ ` i�,__ 0al fivirAv-mal i i Apiliikit =firs, - [ lt 6, .4 2.7 , Aitaltill - WIE411 litt , . mi , lil -- ill -e- 26 , /-t-- al--.. . ._s• ik ..° itsfs% , ik'70•41, . 29 \\i --_-,ttarsi,,,,L1,....,,,:t-\:.- ,,,iiidoialNit;,, , Priekr ii ,__ { 3.0 \ .., Imspor ikigioffloto ---‘241,, .. slakh6lr - .i 3.1 lit, A it :ate _ tillie priodagiosit4.,, J ��'., ',.; z.. $1, •)'a miril . iftd\-1—.." ' 4"--i.-;-' 40v0ii• -arOgy. -'' \41 (t1 1,'s Ai a ,,..,,,,() colv __./ .„.%._ z !;1 T 1 ." 1 N ri / ' 4 lik "7..,' Pk/ 4,11 z/ -..< ehilieN \ tCIFIIN -� ... v ' k.. : A III 33 ii.i 1, -•."- - -^\ SIN% v,,,,\ 44*,_11,10,0..L. .., 1 ,./ .._.: A II ilmti,, .14 0.02Nik lik, , - '. A hig,100,0,. -1,--viditiN if -k,.,„„-- ‘ ,.*:.: fiti -- '\ \--.-- \ i 1 ' ook- .. - _C :-:,.-li r t gig //(‘ 1,477_ _ - .... .....:-..\_,) , fi , I ill) es-i \ r , �lIii :‘,-.:#11 , i( ...I —A 1 di I im, mAir i, ,iii. ,...r.int in vilt \ _ \ /�1',,7 ••••••• • ( t It ,rim /k . MIL_ ..... -*pig _IPPP1WlebliiirIIIII;i lipi' "'9' 4#44 ta , i ...., , r 1 ., ,_.._„ , .i.,, -I k , itt., / 1,/,:.,,,,,. w-‘ if , #1 , 1,, \--- 1 ill 1. I I 1 Ai 10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION Arjili ' , 3.4� ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR •-• k����' - TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 3� F' _ - 0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles ''�. 40' 7- 3.5.I-I0 $h I1gp 4.0 1: 300,000 • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.111 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS at\I VII OFOL.h,. at?. ---41 ,' 411414 tilire i .. ikz .- -....., '• ' „,, 3 � ,,,,,,, ., ,,, ,, „. ..„,,,,. , ......0,, ,, ; a,...9„.. 3...,..,..... . , ,,,,,,, ,._ 0 4,4.,411,,, ....,,43, 4" . ,\.--.. ,i, , ,,y) .: ,,,,lip..... .. ..rit.!.a i ,_ ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.„..,_ .., 4 \ iN liktrog...,_,',11Amr-- ;, ric7, Awe! ISAL-101a ,' e' iff . -1 43 ) , . k4N14014-liftiffirlikeiLlOk...1111.016.401" - - /' "re, .---5 (4)- •' 4•..•<•\A; iA- Ai it'\'1'lmCt&eIl',I.,Mr''I t.1/4;1l4)1)41_1itt 4\.l„, lr.i\2\a 0l ei0id r kmfinf 1 r',7k„•F l„i' in i0.1riA il';rltki a m;ti,,hS1,/‘-a4=r#4,.iI fir -%1-.':. A liA *0'4I0v-5. 4 46 f:- , -: el IA; ,,44\t- al -46Villikv N -) w''''\tilic ,, ,, I>--- 1.11 r .4.1 ,14,11 :�_ I r l lik . �3 . .tip SOi Ily. \liti 16 ''''''-vAil,,, \Ilt, ,. , T.,) ,. i wog4. ■ ► ' itit& 111) (t Ali ' PI ;I ' ts::' yl a 1 , , I- 1.lir ._ , _ Z! (,_ wbilltLiiat io*e, .... ..,, . 4140 g ill A PreAkh . 0=-• i• 1 p _ , .. .if \'"/--- r "fir 's":VW - ...:447/ I; If ----, ' • i or 7 ___,i ., .., . /,.:.,..i;_ti v _ , . . ,,.,i_ ( _, _7!\--r./ __ . f.-.1__._.‘_. tw i frl t -,,. . !, 100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ,d 1 i 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR O• , . V it. N • FiN. *Pr ' � i� 5.5 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES Qk• tit; '- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles 43--- -- 3.5.1-13 04' �0 . s� - ... 't. - i:300,000 '• 1/90 Sheet1 SBU HYDROGRAPH METHOD: Existing Site Tc SHEET Ts= 0.42*(L*ns)^0.8/(P2^0.5"S^0.4) L(ft) _ ns Z S P2 (in.) T(min.) 486 24 0.24 485 0.0417 2 4.30 _ 30 0.24 482 0.1000 2 3.62 57 0.24 480 0.0351 2 9.19 51 0.24 474 0.1176 2 5.18 T= L/(601k*S^0.5) L(ft) k S CHANNEL 50 9 0.04 0.46 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 22.76 =23 min Developed Site Tc SHEET L (ft) ns S P2 (in.) T(min.) 24 0.011 0.1 2 0.26 CONCNT._ L (ft) k S 180 42 0.005 1.01 32 42 0.02 0.09 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 1.36 =1.5 min GRASS SHEET L(ft) ns S P2 (in.) T(min.) 45 0.15 0.1 2 3.44 CONCNT. L(ft) k S 130 42 0.005 0.73 TIME OF CONCENTRATION 4.17 =4 min Page 1 PECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP 00,24, 3 . 9 ******************* S .C . S . TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ******** 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 . 90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* NTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 596 , 78 ,0 , 98 , 23 ATA PRINT-OUT : AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES ) A CN A CN . 6 . 6 78 . 0 . 0 98 . 0 23 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS ) VOL(CU-FT) . 19 7 . 83 3894 NTER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 36DX100 .HYD PECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP NTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 . 276 ,80 ,0 . 320 , 98 ,4 ATA PRINT-OUT : AREA(ACRES ) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 6 . 3 80 . 0 . 3 98 . 0 4 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS ) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .48 7 . 67 6222 NTER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 36DV100 .HYD PECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP .C . S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION NTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP( INCHES ) 0 , 24, 2 . 9 ******************* S .C . S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ******** 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 90" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* NTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 596,78,0,98,23 ATA PRINT-OUT : AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 6 . 6 78 . 0 . 0 98 . 0 23 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) . 10 7 . 83 2282 LATER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 36EX10 .HYD PECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP LATER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 . 276 ,80 ,0 . 320 ,98 ,4 PtTA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES ) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES ) A CN A CN . 6 . 3 80 . 0 . 3 98 . 0 4 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS ) VOL(CU-FT) . 33 7 . 67 4278 4TER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 36DV10 .HYD ?ECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP 1 S.C . S . TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER : FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP( INCHES ) **h,<**************** S . C . S . TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0 . 596 , 78 ,0, 98 ,23 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES ) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES ) A CN A CN . 6 . 6 78 . 0 . 0 98 . 0 23 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS ) VOL(CU-FT) . 03 8 . 00 1045 ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 636EX2 .HYD SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP C ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A( IMPERV) , CN( IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 2 0 . 276 ,80 ,0 . 320 ,98,4 DA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES ) A CN A CN . 6 . 3 80 . 0 . 3 98 . 0 4 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS ) T-PEAK(HRS ) VOL(CU-FT) . 20 7 . 67 2625 ENTER [d: ] [path]filename[ . ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 636DV2 .HYD SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE , N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP 6 IV-b. BIO SWALE DESIGN Bottom width=6.3 ft. 3:1 side slopes longitudiunal slope=2% length= 100 ft constructed swale depth=0.7 ft Respective Calculation Printouts: 1. 200 If design norm, design parameters solving bottom width 2. 100 If swale: same design water surface area, solving for required topwidth by iterating bottom width 3. solve for 2Yr depth with actual swale parameters 4. solve for 100 Yr depth with actual swale parameters Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name : BIOSWALE-DESIGN Comment : BOTTOM WIDTH - 200 LF Solve For Bottom Width Given Input Data: Left Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 . 350 Channel Slope 0 . 0200 ft/ft Depth 0 . 33 ft Discharge 0 . 20 cfs Computed Results : Bottom Width. . . . 1 . 67 ft Velocity 0 . 23 fps Flow Area 0 . 88 sf Flow Top Width 3 . 65 ft Wetted Perimeter 3 . 76 ft Critical Depth 0 . 07 ft Critical Slope 4 . 5006 ft/ft Froude Number 0 . 08 ( flow is Subcritical ) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 4 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods , Inc . * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name : BIOSWALE-DESIGN-100 Comment : BOTTOM WIDTH - 100 LF Solve For Depth Given Input Data : Bottom Width 6 . 30 ft Left Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 . 350 Channel Slope 0 . 0200 ft/ft Discharge 0 . 20 cfs Computed Results : Depth 0 . 17 ft Velocity 0 . 17 fps Flow Area 1 . 15 sf Flow Top Width 7 . 31 ft Wetted Perimeter 7 . 37 ft Critical Depth 0 . 03 ft Critical Slope 5 . 7042 ft/ft Froude Number 0 . 08 ( flow is Subcritical ) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 4 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods , Inc . * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name : BIOSWALE-2YR Comment : ACTUAL BIOSWALE - 2 YR. FLOW Solve For Depth Given Input Data : Bottom Width 6 . 30 ft Left Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Right Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Manning ' s n 0 . 080 Channel Slope 0 . 0200 ft/ft Discharge 0 . 20 cfs Computed Results : Depth 0 . 07 ft Velocity 0 . 44 fps Flow Area 0 . 46 sf Flow Top Width 6 . 72 ft Wetted Perimeter 6 . 74 ft Critical Depth 0 . 03 ft Critical Slope 0 . 2980 ft/ft Froude Number 0 . 30 ( flow is Subcritical ) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 4 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods , Inc . * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name : BIOSWALE-100YR Comment : ACTUAL BIOSWALE - 100 YR. FLOW Solve For Depth Given Input Data : Bottom Width 6 . 30 ft Left Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H :V) Right Side Slope 3 . 00 : 1 (H:V) Manning' s n 0 . 080 Channel Slope 0 . 0200 ft/ft Discharge 0 . 48 cfs Computed Results : Depth 0 . 12 ft Velocity 0 . 61 fps Flow Area 0 . 79 sf Flow Top Width 7 . 01 ft Wetted Perimeter 7 . 05 ft Critical Depth 0 . 06 ft Critical Slope 0 . 2469 ft/ft Froude Number 0 . 32 ( flow is Subcritical ) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3 . 4 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods , Inc . * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 7 V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS Applying the manning equation to full flow in pipes, table below shows the minimum slopes for a 6" diameter pipe to convey at least the 100 yr. developed peak flow of 0.48 cfs. All of the pipes have a greater slope, sothat they convey over 0.48 cfs. PIPE CAPACITIES CPEP CAPACITY Q = 1.49/n *A * RA(2/3) * S^(1/2) FULL FLOW, SO THAT R =A/P = D/4 Showing minimum slopes for 12" pipes n L (ft) S D (ft) R v (fps) A (sf) Q (cfs) 0.012 57 0.00016 1 0.25 0.62 0.79 0.49 smooth wall 0.024 57 0.00065 1 0.25 0.63 0.79 0.49 single wall Showing minimum slopes for 6" pipes 0.012 48 0.0063 0.50 0.13 2.46 0.20 0.48 smooth wall 0.024 48 0.025 0.50 0.13 2.45 0.20 0.48 single wall • 'q - 0q (9J GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Renton Apartments NE 9th Place and Edmonds Avenue Renton, Washington 1111 Project No. T-4262 xa� Terra Associates, Inc. Prepared for: Cambridge Homes Kirkland, Washington DEV> << ELOPMENT PL,6,7. Jv CITY OF RENT �'v January 27, 1999 AIIG 0 3 1999 RECEIVED k TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. .c Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology t and Environmental Earth Sciences January 27, 1999 Project No. T-4262 Mr.Jeff Reiker Cambridge Homes 11017— 101st Place NE Kirkland,Washington 98033 Subject: Geotechnical Report Renton Apartments NE 9th Place and Edmonds Avenue Renton,Washington Dear Mr. Reiker: As requested, we have conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subject project. The attached report presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. Our field exploration indicates the site is generally underlain by brown medium dense, silty fine sand. In our opinion, these soil conditions will be suitable for support of the building foundations as proposed, provided the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into project design and construction. We trust this information is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, TERRA ASSOCIATES,INC. 1111 Runqi Wang,Ph.D.,P.E. Project Engineer << ' ' "`.2^ • Theodore J. Schepper, '' 2642 Principal Engineer w :: RW/TJS:dvp tomes 6/18/9q 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (425) 821-7777 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Project Description 1 2.0 Scope of Work 1 3.0 Site Conditions 2 3.1 Surface 2 3.2 Soils 2 3.3 Groundwater 2 3.4 Seismic 2 4.0 Discussion and Recommendations 3 4.1 General 3 4.2 Site Preparation and Grading 3 4.3 Foundations 4 4.4 Lower-Level Building/Retaining Walls 5 4.5 Slab-on-Grade Construction 5 4.6 Drainage 5 4.7 Utilities 6 4.8 Pavements 6 5.0 Additional Services 6 6.0 Limitations 7 Figures Vicinity Map Figure 1 Exploration Location Plan Figure 2 Retaining Wall Drainage Detail Figure 3 Appendix Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A (i) Geotechnical Report Renton Apartments NE 9th Place and Edmonds Avenue Renton, Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of developing an approximately 0.6-acre parcel of land with an apartment building with detached carports or garages, driveways, and utilities. Based on a preliminary site plan provided by Cambridge Homes, dated December 1, 1998, we understand that the apartment structure will be three stories and wood- framed.Based on our experience with similar construction, we expect that the building load will be 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot for perimeter bearing wall loads and 30 to 40 kips for isolated column loads. The preliminary site plan also indicates that the lowest building floor will be constructed as a slab-on-grade at an elevation three feet below existing grade. The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based upon our understanding of the above design features. If actual features vary or changes are made, we should review them in order to modify our recommendations as required. We should review final design drawings and specifications to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK On January 4, 1999, we excavated five test pits to a maximum depth of eight feet below existing surface grades. Using the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, we performed analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for project design and construction. Specifically, this report addresses the following: • Soil and groundwater conditions • Seismic • Suitability of native soils for use as fill • Recommendations for import fill material • Site preparation and grading • Foundations • Slab-on-grade support • Utilities • Pavements January 27, 1999 Project No. T-4262 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Surface The project site is located at NE 9th Place and Edmonds Avenue in Renton, Washington. The site is roughly rectangular-shaped and measures about 160 feet wide (east-west) and 150 to 170 feet long (north-south). The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The site is bordered to the north and east by an existing apartment, to the west by a single-family residence, and to the south by NE 9th Place. The site generally slopes down towards the west with an overall gradient of about ten percent. The site is primarily undeveloped and covered with trees and blackberries. There is an abandoned carport on the northeast corner of the site and a paved driveway along the east property line. A six-foot steel wire fence enclosed the property. We did not observe any water ponding on the surface at the time of performing our field investigation. 3.2 Soils The soil we observed in the test pits was fairly uniform across the site. The site was underlain by brown, medium dense, silty fine sand from surface to test pit termination depths. Test Pit TP-3 encountered a sandy silt layer about two feet above the silty sand. The Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington, by D.R. Mullineaux (1965), shows that the on-site soil is recessional outwash along the Cedar River Valley (Qpa). The deposit mainly consists of well- sorted sand and gravel. This description is generally consistent with the material we observed in the test pits, except we did not observe any gravel. More detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered are presented on the Test Pit Logs in Appendix A. The test pit locations are shown on the Exploration Location Plan, Figure 2. 3.3 Groundwater We did not encounter any groundwater seepage in the test pits at the time of our field exploration. The native soils exhibit low to moderate permeability and appear to be well drained. Therefore, we do not expect a static water level will establish within the depth of our test pits. 3.4 Seismic The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3, as classified by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology from Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, a site soil profile type of SD should be used in design. Page No. 2 January 27, 1999 Project No. T-4262 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in water pressure induced by vibrations from a seismic event. It mainly affects geologically-recent deposits of fine- grained sands that are below the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular friction. The generated water pressure, or pore pressure, essentially separates the soil grains and eliminates this intergranular friction,thus reducing or eliminating the soil's strength. Based on soil conditions we observed at the test pits and the local geology, it is our opinion that there is no risk for liquefaction to occur at the site during an earthquake. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 General Based on our study, the site is suitable for the proposed construction from a geotechnical standpoint. Foundations for residences can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on medium dense silty sand below the upper two feet of surficial soils. Alternatively, if required by desired final building elevations, structural fill placed and compacted above the medium dense sand can be used to support the building foundations. Floor slabs and pavements can be similarly supported. Native soils without organics are permeable and well drained and are generally suitable for use as structural fill, provided their moisture content can be controlled to facilitate proper compaction. The following sections provide detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical design considerations. These recommendations should be incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications. 4.2 Site Preparation and Grading To prepare the site for construction, all vegetation, organic surface soils, and other deleterious materials should be stripped and removed from the site. Surface stripping depths of about 6 to possibly 12 inches should be expected to remove organic topsoil. Stripped vegetation debris should be removed from the site. Organic topsoil will not be suitable for use as structural fill but may be used for limited depths in non-structural areas such as landscaping. Once the site is cleared and stripped, cuts and fills can be made to establish desired building grades. Prior to placing fill, we recommend proofrolling all exposed surfaces to determine if any isolated soft and yielding areas are present. Proofrolling should also be performed in cut areas that will provide direct support for new construction. Page No. 3 January 27, 1999 Project No. T-4262 If excessively yielding areas are observed, they should be cut to firm bearing soils and filled to grade with structural fill. If the depth of excavation to remove unstable soils is excessive, use of geotextile fabric, such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent, in conjunction with structural fill can be considered in order to limit the depth of removal. A minimum of 18 inches of a clean, granular structural fill over the geotextile fabric should establish a stable bearing surface. A representative of Terra Associates, Inc. should observe all proofrolling operations. We also recommend field evaluations at the time of construction to verify stable subgrades. The native soils contain a sufficient amount of fines that will make them difficult to use as structural fill during wet weather conditions. If the native soil moisture contents cannot be controlled, the owner should be prepared to import wet weather structural fill. For this purpose, we recommend importing a granular soil that meets the following grading requirements: U.S.Sieve Size Percent Passing 3 inches 100 No. 4 75 maximum No. 200 5 maximum* *Based on the 3/4-inch fraction. Prior to use, Terra Associates, Inc. should examine and test all materials imported to the site for use as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches and should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of its optimum, as determined by this same standard. In non-structural areas or for backfill in utility trenches below a depth of 4 feet, the degree of compaction could be reduced to 90 percent. 4.3 Foundations Buildings may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soils or structural fill placed and compacted as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. For frost protection, perimeter foundations should bear at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final exterior grades. Interior foundations can be constructed at any convenient depth below the floor slab. Foundations can be dimensioned for a net allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf). For short-term loads, such as wind and seismic, a one-third increase in this allowable capacity can be used. With structural loading as anticipated and this stress applied, building settlements should be less than one inch total and one-half inch differential. Page No. 4 January 27, 1999 Project No.T-4262 For designing foundations to resist lateral loads, a friction coefficient of 0.4 can be used. Passive earth pressures acting on the sides of the footing and buried portion of the foundation stem walls can also be considered. We recommend calculating this lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We do not recommend including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation because it can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity. This value assumes the foundations will be constructed neat against competent native soil or backfilled with structural fill, as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. The passive value recommended includes a safety factor of 1.5. 4.4 Lower-Level Building/Retaining Walls The magnitude of earth pressure development on lower-level walls will partly depend on the quality of the wall backfill. We recommend placing and compacting wall backfill as structural fill. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development, wall drainage must also be installed. A typical recommended wall drainage detail is shown on the Retaining Wall Drainage Detail,Figure 3. With wall backfill placed and compacted as recommended, and drainage properly installed, we recommend designing unrestrained walls for an active earth pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid weighing 35 pcf. For restrained walls, an additional uniform lateral pressure of 100 psf should be added. These values assume a horizontal backfill condition and that no other surcharge loading, such as traffic, sloping embankments, or adjacent buildings, will act on the wall. If such conditions will exist, then the imposed loading must be included in the wall design. Friction at the base of foundations and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in the Foundations section of this report. 4.5 Slab-on-Grade Construction Slabs-on-grade may be supported on the subgrade prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Immediately below the floor slab we recommend installing a capillary break layer. The capillary break should consist of a four-inch thick layer of clean, free-draining sand or gravel that has less than three percent passing the No. 200 sieve. This material will reduce the potential for upward capillary movement of water through the underlying soil and subsequent wetting of the floor slabs. Where moisture by vapor transmission is undesirable, a durable plastic membrane should be placed over the capillary break layer. The membrane should be covered with two inches of clean, moist sand to guard against damage during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. 4.6 Drainage Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the site at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building areas. We recommend providing a minimum drainage gradient of three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeters, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structures. Page No. 5 • January 27, 1999 Project No.T-4262 We understand that consideration is being given to using infiltration systems on the site for the discharge of roof 7 water runoff. The results of our field exploration and laboratory testing indicate that the native soils encountered at shallow depths on the site generally contain up to 40 percent fines. The native soils are relatively dense and generally not suitable for supporting the disposal of roof water runoff by infiltration. Therefore, we do not recommend using an infiltration system for disposal of the roof water runoff. 4.7 Utilities Utility pipes should be bedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public Works Association (APWA) specifications. For site utilities within the City right-of-way, bedding and backfill should be completed in accordance with City of Renton specifications. As a minimum, trench backfill should be placed and compacted as structural fill, as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Soils excavated on-site will be suitable for use as backfill material in dry weather conditions. During wet weather, if the moisture content of the native soils cannot be controlled, it may be necessary to import wet weather material for trench backfill. 4.8 Pavements Pavement subgrades should be prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section of this report. Regardless of the relative compaction achieved, the subgrade must be firm and relatively unyielding before paving. The subgrade should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition. The pavement section is dependent upon the supporting capability of the subgrade soils and the traffic conditions ? to which it will be subjected. With a stable subgrade prepared as recommended for traffic consisting mainly of light passenger and commercial vehicles,we recommend the following pavement sections: • • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC)over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base(ATB) The paving materials used should conform to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) specifications for Class B asphalt concrete,ATB, and CRB. 5.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Terra Associates, Inc. should review the final design and specifications in order to verify that earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented into project design. We should also provide geotechnical services during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations. This will allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. Page No. 6 January 27, 1999 Project No.T-4262 6.0 LIMITATIONS I This report is the property of Terra Associates, Inc. and was prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is intended for specific application to the Renton Apartments project and for the exclusive use of Cambridge Homes and their authorized representatives. No other warranty, } expressed or implied,is made. j The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from the test pits excavated on-site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc. should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. I r t Page No. 7 • • • es pi—!-L 1g 90TH;ST J 6 I ' -' * '` I 33R0 PL I 'li :Ili g. SE 91ST ST t SE 91ST S7 M1Y st SE t.0 N! 33Ro ST' !I .\` 11 4 Sao M4 . CREEK:r _,•./ I 91ST S r/ NI 32ND �� .. E� e. PARK rrK W N CJ!EPSEx (� P \ NE 31ST ST 1 C� a _` uF'" —, 5a SE �1RT ��I '...?.;1., , N TH ,, 5T �� , !NY .� SF 9)�, N W SE %4 CR£EK� e 66 s 1 7BJ Y .- qI i' �% P��- 951H ...w z _'9`sl 'ID %_ \ N 29TH ST; ,.., •II{�!f ,� ��\ _ _s.SF- -- V � i v N 29TH PL s. ea NE■�" arm' _ Sr v ,.� ▪ ` 1 fi I+ s ri_-Br=_-sr 4-1IHE rry —NE-r27TH ST '\�,iS 'r-,I ''t qeM/sStERR&A < 27TN I ,,J� E 21T ;- maws - :<> CT L +Y - loom • PARK _ ' x e 25T=1 P! ■'E \ fq� . '� T P -,SrKf 100TN Sr o NiL,-2S ,. F s,35�=i ^M�� KFNNYDALF :NSM sr i'� rE ,,, y�ls II ��.^_�> Uaws>�I �, �"ag'�■.■:,� �ryt. � aL. s�toorN 241K IsT rTI I .c >•wu.. tt�y r."r i SE RI^ '# *z «<tao sr �\ - 1. 17 ul I N1® Ro PL _ i 102^0' i!i -I"'� RWi 1 II Sn11 sf ti I` 2N0,. -.■ '.>us a ,,, .`; > 't J I• itfr S<`. ,p�rp \� 1111�M u qr _W NE >IO7M 1ST 8 K \\2 /'1 •NE I 20TH �T AI e.Y P.-i Min'CREEK 1 fr 4 F ... 6 r`qT" sr r TrN /,5- it Sr 'w Sy .,0 OPEP SPACE I.- NE 06TN ST 'NE 3 W is,M w �7 a$' E P F N2C�lAx05 0 1,,, � f,, A',. y v YZ V v k• PARK_- i `� i IYG < N • � 16T21. `�■ ^Z 9 NE N ^ '�," 1 a:h. iz W 1ST c- ■1 s SUNSET ■„�4. , , BOAT LAUNCH �` ilj nit. talS _ 21x��,N PLGO ■ i o: kraF` <■un RIr 1 Y S,.. 1 u :i:� ,s.. I> �I z a "E t.TN L v rK.r\ 1 NE [� _ i NE 1,TN Sr a \ ( 'z 11 A'NE - ST ENE 31N pi, 10 < _ sT ;-' ua■r■ 6E""Wier I®` I �I 8�' CI . ��'/,' 12TH Y ST Prif�\ 1 .j NE - 12TH _ ST I NE ' \ IEACx Pii ' •1, 1 F.!: � 2:JJ ✓IP 525 J NV�1�r r/�./� p • 700 E IIM � Mlt� 1�� ' \ . gvir � F+s pIpRK °A_DR = : 24, e� n11t I nn ,i`° - " lyl **Is_ I� ly rpW Ji.. NE�„ R R g � 1oM!l' 11I ear LAUNCH \ . Q OQ- _ - sA �' \\\ rttul ■BOflAG \ .I .ta a Wi', \� .`�© C`+I ,= �sjJr� sr •J ¢ml REKrA4 \\ / \i ;gr�, FPS \� , •ST " s DM v\E],, 1 SE 116r = 8 NE :n � s� s" 5I./ bliii:;1'r)T1::::v4i.rM `z i Rle c.-JNE -tu�• 3s9 ; NE . STA'C <' NTHST ' NE •••111 -1 >i" "1xE7ST PE` -1 - , E ST✓' TX ST 31E E - �I TR41L > ■r�. r iy SITE � �. it � A- ,Mn ,,... �� z z� i' E 7 z.. �...r E.V NE z6iE I NE STH ST i �' ,; -eV!'" ii-g ��f +r 3 xf s}' r� r s y< < 9 r N f r / ;J� NE ma° . QI 1i tI\ .Rfx. 'lit E stN. p & . -<j _ �•` < i i 4 �. 91 �n (( otsen•�E E �'7llccc/y NE•zI rrnfuF UL . 1 4TH g= �` ... !:ST 5st ► P T 1 1100 1-�ST � l�. r #��o in ' m1 ' I300 i. 'd �;• -1= J _ 3R0 �� ®� ;.•405 ��c b -1 ,f . ,,IAL '• .`NE 31ro R - I� - - RE.xra �mmin es w. ' F, AlRroxr >,:• j PARK • NL41 r— �I ORT H ' sT � }",r"�� NE �(�0 L NE_ Sr-• _ �N i r _j' SE tit-- 1-sr S .1 1100 !l��� �� .r1LLi ? N `r/I0 Ni r lF' ' ,' L=: a. TOe1N =<� ?. . , Z A. r� CTH mil "� 1ir A � SI 15 EN1C0 <' w i N 4 ± / '�-ii / 17 a,-. LEfwNE RIM <' -_ : + sir c . H em > 'Cm,L16ERTY / ^ ••':` l 1` o!tPET EsrAT6 y , usrx 2ND S 1 cEUEa',. CEMETERY 16 rxr ` . sT iR RENTON 1 / >' . 2ND PI : SE-1 i 9(10'- `I ®o —'arcR�'�iARr' ` 1 , �q �, 1 x'Yxn, z' -� STf>I !';; 1a \ , , , 8i-0,I , Q 1 fin m■. a /. _.`'ql RD SE STH S _J J Nsl fix' rsTN 5 ST • B !f9. e cp. �Y �^ - ""'T., vV '' 4 L Sf 1 p. 1 s uric ST nv sr• C' /NRiE4. •` ST --1 142ND ' 3j7�pp 1. ... ,, ;I:'6s < ►fJ• H Cr N !s--ir -,. t 'ry \\ •... '.. si,h • 1 .S\;r.4 17sr �� = I; s , . E • . .+ Cft R1VER -� 1uvLaC°4 1 a 1 .41 REFERENCE: THE THOMAS GUIDE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PAGES 626 AND 656, 1999 EDITION. VICINITY MAP - ?Af'.a:',:: TERRA RENTON APARTMENTS .-����\�\\ ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON • • •'otechnical Consultants Proj.No. 4262 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 1 I 3 I r-- •-- •-- I Fr 3 60 feet //11 3 1 1 PROPOSE BUILD IN, LOCATION I 1 'LAN PROVIDED BY .. I A EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN RENTON APARTMENTS RENTON, WASHINGTON Proj.No. 4262 I Date JAN. 1999 I Figure 2 1 12" MINIMUM WIDE 3/4" WASHED ROCK OR PEA GRAVEL SLOPE TO DRAIN _ 't• . 1 � •, /17 APPROPRIATE INCLINATIONS) t � � i' COMPACTED STRUCTURAL kg E - BACKFILL kOs\ZOPS:141.2410:14%**. 12" OVER THE PIPE 4" DIAMETER PVC 3" BELOW THE PIPE PERFORATED PIPE NOT TO SCALE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL EOM TERRA RENTON APARTMENTS kea ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON � Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 4262 Date JAN. 1999 Figure 3 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Renton Apartments Renton,Washington On January 4, 1999, we performed our field exploration using a rubber-tired backhoe. We explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by excavating five test pits to a maximum depth of eight feet below existing grades. The test pit locations are shown on the Exploration Location Plan, Figure 2. The locations were approximately determined by pacing from existing property lines and visual observation of ground reference points. The Test Pit Logs are presented on Figures A-2 through A-4. A geotechnical engineer from our office conducted the field exploration and classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each boring, obtained representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. All soil samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System(USCS) described on Figure A-1. Representative soil samples obtained from the test pits were placed in closed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of each sample was measured and is reported on the Test Pit Logs. Grain size analyses were performed on four of the samples, the results of which are shown on Figures A-5 and A-6. Project No. T-4262 MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION ISYMBOL Clean GW Well-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no GRAVELS Gravels fines. 5 al (less than GP Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or N More than 5% fines) no fines. �'N 50% of coarse Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fraction is GM a> > larger than No. Gravels fines. z u�—, 4 sieve with fines GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. o N Clean 1 CC Sands SW Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. 00 SANDS ULl c Z (less than Poorly-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no s c More than 5% fines) S P fines. co 50% of coarse a0 0 fraction is SM Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines. 0 smaller than Sands No. 4 sieve with fines SC Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. Inorganic silts, rock flour, clayey silts with slight �_ SILTS AND CLAYS ML plasticity. .--I1 •c O O ccv CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, (lean clay). E o 0 Liquid limit is less than 50% 0 ou)Z.� OL Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. 1 W Z � a) - > MH Inorganic silts, elastic. cc as. m SILTS AND CLAYS IO Inor anic cla s of hi h lasticit fat cla s W 0E CH 9 Y 9 plasticity, Y • Z 0 w Liquid limit is greater than 50% W OH Organic clays of high plasticity. I HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS Standard Penetration 2" OUTSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT Q Density Resistance in Blows/Foot I SPOON SAMPLER cc 0 Very loose 0-4 — 2.4" INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER o Loose 4-10 — OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER Medium dense 10-30 z Dense 30-50 Y WATER LEVEL (DATE) 3 < Very dense >50 Tr TORVANE READINGS, tsf Standard Penetration Pp PENETROMETER READING tsf gConsistency Resistance in Blows/Foot DD DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot U Very soft 0-2 LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent I o Soft 2-4 I— Medium stiff 4-8 PI PLASTIC INDEX ' Stiff 8-16 �- . Very stiff 16-32 N STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per foot IHard >32 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ��� TERRA RENTON APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-4262 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-1 Test Pit No. TP-5 Logged by: RW Approximate Elev. Date: 1/4/99 Depth Moisture (ft.) Soil Description (%) Content 0 (0 to 6 inches) Forest Duff - Brown silty SAND,fine, moist, medium dense. (SM) 24.1 5— Test pit terminated at 6 feet. No groundwater seepage encountered. 10 I 1 1 TEST PIT LOGS TERRA RENTON APARTMENTS ke0 ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON ummsisGeotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-4262 Date JAN 1999 Figure A-4 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM WCn W 0. O O O O O O \\ \\\\ \ N.) O) O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 DON 0) -tr. W NJ N. -A.CO NJ CO - - O O O O O O Cr) . W NJOo O) - CA NJ . 0 90 10 \ir 0 D—I 80 20 rll -0P1 o (1)7Z) m 73 0 n 70 30 rm w c�D Z c FT D --1 60 40 n ---i O /ru Fri 50 50 ci) V/ P1 c 40 ilk -< 60 v m_ o. 0 30 - 70 m o —1 -P 20 80 N O) N - J 2J G7 Z z D 10 90 o p0Z io Z Z 0 I If fill I 11 I I 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 ill 100 O O 0 0 O O O O O co co A LA NJO '1'' �"� N O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O CT) {' W NJO O O O O O z �DDm GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS CO m A W ^' cf)z7D co _—i Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE Z K D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES -Z u)Fri < 2 - O c Key Test Pit Depth USCS Description Moisture LL PL Number (ft.) Content (%) cI • TP-1 5.0 SM silty SAND 0 TP-3 4.0 SM silty SAND SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM _ Wes --' W N. O O 66 O O \\ \\\\ \ NJQ� O op 66 O O O O O O O _O topir 1 OON co ? CA N) N)- ?CO N.) OO . .P O O CD CD CD Cr) -P. CANJCb CI - W N.) 1 0 90 10 (c,--,14 D—I 80 20 _0 rn v M o (/)X m73 0 (]7CI n 70 30 rn,I� Friz nD --1 D 60 40 n o -I T1 0 rn M 50 50 Cr) (/) 70 m CU 2J 40 - 60 CO a. 0 30 70 L i! 0 -In - 20 80 Cr)ts•J N.) Z z > 10 90 o �� Z =z (r) 0 I II II I 1 I Hill I I 1 11 1 1 1 1 I I 1 III I 100 D NJ CD CD CDO 0 CD O O CD CD O COCAN 'p` Cal N •--••OOO p O •O O O O O O O O 0 D D m GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS CD co-- =_1 z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE Ca z K D COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES -Izv3 21 oz� � Key Test Pit Depth USCS Description Moisture LL PL Number (ft.) Content (%) D I • TP-5 3.0 SM silty SAND