Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-090 .. FQ,,��Vm,s of- KCCOY.4 Resident Resident Resident 312 Smithers Avenue South 316 Smithers Avenue South 330 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 -ti Resident Ms. Bettie Smith €Q-Ms. Jeanett Schultz 336 Smithers Avenue South 315 Smithers Avenue South j' 317 Smith rs Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Resident Ms. Rebecca Lloyd Resident 321 Smithers Avenue South 331 Smithers Avenue South 340 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 'TEE `)iNEE7 liemeirrt Resident Resident 320 Smithers Avenue South 329 Smithers Avenue South 396 SmithersAvenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Resident Resident 311 Smithers Avenue South 341 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 - 99-ogo ,Set V2 set Gary&Janice Faull VERSIDATA SYSTEMS INC Boyd Buckingham Jr. Gary Faull 321 Burnett Ave S#200 321 Burnett Ave S#401 PO Box 26 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98057 Wesley Kelson PACIFIC COAST RY CO Alice Reiman Erickson 833 108Th Ave Ne 1700 E Golf Rd#400 7600 Se 29Th St#201 Bellevue,WA 98004 Schaumburg, IL 60173 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Jack Arnold RENTON COMMERCE CENTER Ron&Rosemary Halsen 10805 Glen Acres Dr S PO Box 1113 707 S 4Th St Seattle, WA 98168 Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98055 Gene&Huong Sens FRANK R VAISE POST 1263 Timothy McCormick 7259 S Sunnycrest Rd 416 Burnett Ave S#04254- 15531 Se 168Th St Seattle,WA 98178 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98058 David Princhetta Steven&Robert White John Alvin Zandt 13655 171St Ave Se 500 Wall St#417 5963 Rainier Ave S Renton,WA 98059 Seattle,WA 98121 Seattle, WA 98118 Lydia Pickup GOOD PARTNERSHIP QUINTON 83D MALL LLC 605 Houser Way S 617 S 3Rd St PO Box 461 Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Redmond,WA 98073 Paul Ohnemus Jeffrey&Lisa Miner Jeffrey Dineen 312 Smithers Ave S#B 316 Smithers Ave S 320 Smithers Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 LODGE RENTON NO 8 I O O F Michael Frankel Charlie Bergemann 324 Smithers Ave S PO Box 2275 336 Smithers Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Toluca Lake, CA 91610 Renton,WA 98055 Kaisha Ann&Richard Basquette Sr. Sandra Tyrone Gollier CITY OF RENTON 340 Smithers Ave S PO Box 128 200 Mill Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98055 J Bert Roberts SUNLITE RESTAURANT INC Robert&Diane Newman 280 Hardie Ave SW#4 509 S 3Rd St 341 Smithers Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Mui Lam&Nhi Vong Barbara Ellen Thumlert George&Nadine Bina 2321 22Nd Ave S 17576 12Th Ave Ne 329 Smithers Ave S Seattle,WA 98144 Seattle,WA 98155 Renton,WA 98055 Hoyt Comeaux Dodson Ray&Julie Johnson David Loebe 321 Smithers Ave S 18808 Se 170Th St PO Box 996 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98058 Renton,WA 98057 AWARENESS OF LIFE CHURC Joe Regis 311 Smithers Ave S 505 S 4Th St Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 I tin -I 010 I_o9g1 ff Ira,.ra•' N2i0M-3M S11N(1 -waa3vsi —� :I 0 1 m I a"' I 1 0 Igo N I -..__—____ y ' D • I r ill11! [fu II i 1 te „ , 4 I v_0 ,, II IIi,___, , II . . ti EP if i _ 7— K II e 1 m II I "` " ' 1 'r1 N o I� r� � Wilir tt ril _� i -'• •a T M rn II N m m II III ga I lik UU ii 't't E.i `A' CO II 11,II TI i _ II i �� , ,- I i i, 02 01 Lill -0 u II l_ � 0 II I - II 0 IL- 1 06 1 1 N o D r m ro v D H121O61 111 U. . SET L-Al-1.CPwg 02-04-1999 BURNETT MIXED USE DATE BY DESCRIPTION a , S T H 0 M NHS A A rite EhY,, c,s !HI T rx !1 13400 Northup Way,Stole 30 r 0 Bellevue,Washington 98005 (425)401-6828 •Fox(425)40-0630 SEATTLE, WA. ) [ ,,, 'S l' ALL 1 4 4, ..., . . A, A. A. ,A, A A_ A, OD° cO O0,00000000OO er 'E O °44 ifitIte 4404 .- O o0PQ•400 A 11W, GO♦ WO » Dy� AL r m ,,,,,, ‘'-- u 00 ..., 41*.filliLtiv mkyll m'', / orliill i syfi ri _vvi -1111441111 •mr kgja — -VIII RAI 1 bla_rileJ Iggk I p Lzfr. A Tilopi..... ...:440r4 a 4 1 ,,,,,,,„_471 Lii Lu ':104T4A4 - ri.Alhil...4,r_ _________._,'ilit4 , Aidikoop. - ,Ariory/4011, 03 Y A111666". /A.": AI ,rik ....,,.... _ A._ A.,.........,-..00,--......- ..., v � o• .'° vir I6 1e .— -�, _• D '-� . ,..,,P, >kr E , Vli — — 1 . 1 — — z PP 1 . COURT YARD AND BALCONY LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 ., m 9 Solent!?IC NOW Common Name 064. Size COMffignts Q Key SGIenIIG Nme Gonrnon Nme sty. Size Comments Treee: Aze a ..dMzIIe Abs' L.dMolb Abs Azalea C IS'-10'M. Y N QQ LL wAm4a nowwnMa Macroi.a Assl.e S IS'-ID'4. Q A.r palmatum .kga4..Maple 00 9'-10' t4 ItI-tonic(b) rp Daphne adore Wlnt.r PmMr 2 2 aal. broundcover: __T' Mow For..t Flaw' Fort Flan.Pieria 1 3 - . Ii `<;o I I Wagner-SPECIES AS NOTED 4.r d"i Galt IC'oz. etIC' enrv...na.rvlr.rr 7whvlNco.a' DI.Mrvlgco.o 9oxnood D+ m Erica c.V.-Inwood Yfilt.' go lo).0 vturnm apuW.hewn' Dncrf Cranberry Eu.h 47 R•-ia•ht a I Erica dcrleyw•r Varlet,Dal:-SPECIES A.',kid Igo cant C:on. Ned.4 tloRwtieo weber Dwarf Motor Dwarf 14ov.nly Embo. 'J 2 qol o i I S } Erica coma Wither-SPECIES AS NOTED A.r.a'd Igo coot ID'0a. Arbutus p,.� undo carreacta Genpact Stw b.ny Dlah 4 5 ital. SCALE 1/4" = 1 —0" i• II Er4a vacpr N.atlw-SPECIES AS NOTED N r.q'd 19a�t IS.oz. KOyrilo latpana'OWp'.R.d• OYfeL Rod Kalnb I s WI. = i 1 5 I Era v.Ms.D.F.MOwx.11' N.Wr-SPECIE who'd S AS NOTED A. 19.eOM lle.'o' e. t/wGO11W.eabYfa.I D,szot s L. on.. I I5.-lb' I D I c Erica c.Ruby eiow' N.athhr-SPECIES AS NOTED 4.r.q'd I go cart ID'oz. jl S i 1 I Erica G.Y olio' WOW, SPECIES AS NOTED' y Gan.ur waqua M1M.b of 0.,wthis Gan.11b 2 s qpl rhq'd go cart, IV oa. Owarthto D 1 _Colton wigor'D.e•I.I' 9.o4f Search Heather A.r q'a Igo colt ID'o4. CS ,yr la 1k o .i Sk.mb F 2 gal. M. hi I R 1- Dabe.cb polltollo kWh 8.11 H.othor A.rhg'd I gal cent IV oo. Rnd4.ndron 000bnl - ♦ug.t.nn M5dSdO bcn I 24-50'M.mbar ','-' ® '1450 mbar LIttl.Ihnf P.rlrvink4 A. q d r. I gal cent ID'o4. piedodwxten tAiewr.' thaw Phodedwltron I 24'-50' F' II I A1ugo r.ptor ISurq:dy Lack' _ Arg✓nd\}pc.'Corot*tlu40 A.1.6610 I gal cad ID'00. ..- itliedadwxkan Vary Mlat r' Dora Amato*Ptwdodwitron D I6•-24•M. Itlndod.ndron m2rawiatan Morav4Mn Itlrodod.nd-m 5 e•-ID' Perennials: INOdod.^d'an llltab.th' ratioRrododwxton I 24'-SO' m owOMR Rhoeodwlden trth.c.rr LuWc.n Rheded.naran I 24'-50' Woe r BURNEfT I 12 I Link.noborwl.. Flax A.who'd I gal cart ID Rh'00. - edadwtrso P 45 Pur'Purple 95 r' Pop M w,Splendor ododd'an i ID'-24'M. I IS I H.IbRfwa.n nwmula-bn Candle Delah4Mn-ALL COLORS As r.Q I a a I tort ID' or M' DW TR 'Odadw d an S y-D•M. (�)o 14 PapavK nudbaulo Ie.iand Poppy A.r.gd I gal cod ID'so. Rhododwdrzn'Pablo Taq.r.4' Pablo Togotvl Modeyndwn S ID•-24'ht. /I •1 IS D.IpheAm.Iaturn Condo D.Iphhbn-ALL COLORS A.who'd I gal soot lb'04. PotwR114 MOW..Togo..' 1Te, 5.'GYqu5ell 4 15'-lb'ht. L L I, * I- Ph or TA- lox ace ..LNdgod•,R wh s olhd. Phlox von. A.woo I qa1 eat ID'so. C=. vod Lar4 erg...Walla'ewrpaeta' axo+ 4 M tergi.h Lowed.. 4 ID' 4' . �o� P1tWponxn tobre Tobin I 2 gal litFNcb rag.l4nlw Pinola 2 2 gal. Wry.n tN lbw mugo go I 2 gal Mw 99008 \ . / \ SE / [Y<T NRMET tTn� ill �! ui6w MO'MlE Wu IIOR RAZE e I rc imm•e muII IT FTFI ll•I, ..Ell 337 7 i.. ... ////// 9 .... ... ... ... u. .n s !H W - piJI .. . .. c , NE 0111 Fil i____I pm III L o o cu SOUTH ELEVATION — vu•W.10 H r-�lH V nunEo rnx luvn6 C a� �.Ar. m, z E Mil l ua¢ Ley-\\ O m� I I 1 1 1 1 1 I .1 1 I 1 0 CC) O ate, _!!_ :: :: :: :: ' �I_� �I_� �I_� _, �f!!�f��l 111111 n 13 I ��_. ■■ NE ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 4 111111 -„e, vs7e ® ■■■. ESE ME■ EOM MOM IEEE IEEE EEO EMS ■/M ■E■ IN NI MINI NB INN INN NMN MN NI NI ENO ■E■ g. IAnun11 ■M/. IM■ Nu /E■ l�� ■EN. EEN■ ::: •■/■ ■E/ ■E■ me EN/■ /// INN INN gg mom .NNE Igo MINI BO ■I■ s ice_ s� I, _3.,pel 1 ---- ---- — IV : g i II 111 aa11111111 1111 1111::: .::1111 1111 — ■.EIi ig y i ,�y Jill '"1 nil 0 CLEM ANCOMO Out PATE 06/1 0/9E xae ra.wnart L - -------------------—------ rEn—----- —-- - --- 0 FIEVATM5 SOUTH&EAST EAST ELEVATION A 8 [� 99008 • .. i' .. .. .. 1 M.ROOF PLI1 .a..,it ItEnIT' .".?99FF1 MEREFFriM i�ti' 1 fl u�a /® Ito 00 00 �} ce II IA ■I 1 1 ■■ H ■II ■l. N■ •. J _.� LJ it ita 00007 n.. o ■..! ® ® AAA 9� AF An .., 0 0 .... .... ®®®® W ■ reQ ruu n '^ E a • BM ntbe..1.10 IMI _11U___EIMMIL11. riT . .a.COMM I Er WEST ELEVATION H H U WC z CD N /a..vIERF, IP/AM MI, Cao 0 ..�ae,aw ---C I . le _ r 1 s2 so F 0onena ua raa mn00n PATE. O67,0/3 S.TO f4OE!E __ _ _ ELEVATIONS NORTH&WEST NORTH ELEVATION A9 aoa 25.5 411 CO ROM.1.2151.91 TT OW C01.155 emir WA =CAM NV gra .....11.17-11=•---u 101 M;:iiiiiiiiKiT!' .4 h das s'na�nxu."h v tr 8 Z --Ali , list\ '-'' ,..,.,'•,;" - 5 alli ,,......--\ir. ,, , c, g . .>, . ,„_. . . ristoilivi,!\\\. A, z \ta -: ....,„,,,:,•,.. , z ,0,,; .cc����� � 7T. b �,� '+�.�L. _ G t . , I• _ ..s _ _-r..xl�,_�.=_�1 I F-- ._ i..-a-wt`5---:�3i . . 1' . ,..'• c it I[ �'m.. _.. , �s 1 R ! I�yl Q jS. t /tI 'a..-Y=Y ti`�T , 2 01 a ! B . .r 1 Et L • - , 'X.Z . \ s � tie._ ©, ti :1 -'�- t �� I`I`��~eI I®��® ®� .••o,�a .,.« - pT\. ice...-1; 0.� '-�.� j-'� -0. �: I. Y -ate- aMARVCN AVE S. •� - �' . '• �.. Y /r ♦�e[y]�1I e� 1 SMAT>?UT+ i[ t DY / :i1�� «.... I ti 111111111111-11111Niti P 1111111P11600,1 `, I 1 p ; ` �i,+ t t i�1 it to ,-. ! !!N!k © _`V dM !R li �hingENEE.55s--- � ■� ]� �y --- ;.�a,1 —__ °: iilfi/lW H p'" 4"Z•• + iv a Y�`>�Q'• NIE :.-ITWOMTM AC S. _ r t MMR'MMTM AVE. , t r �q.'1 i , i ". ,t% '• ' ' '. ' • ELPISKINT2 i ".. I M- 2 '' l' t JAN % y 0114, uzli usw-1 .' v I, . 31"`' 1164-4--- .11511 . Mili 111114,..:.:. .....:„, ..,,,...t. ,. . - NIL ..,„,,,,, ...,.i,% ,, m_p__R:,,,_ .... , .....„..Mb..MMIll I Ni 13151M. Eti ! t i +ram• J WSW] AYE f. 7-1 .�.Y'11 .. . _ r .. « • t MOMSIS AVE S. t 3 .� r t , • r /..1.:j ‘.'" ilail*Minit 31111EM61:11 IW :ItN" '•••176:id‘k\a 11111111211g1 :1 = .• �. -;115 © • � _[►� a 4. I. t14 -: L.:---‘-': - ‘. n--•.� k Y fMITMEA! AVE kW Mo • 0 ��� 3 • S t i Y .I I` I 1 = • t[©��.Y]t( I f♦ SlialE `.-- O 1 AVE. ©` IF ,, ;(R,•1 `� S®,_ ��Y � �S���1 MON241'j � ���� � � I1 YIOfAN AVE. f s . - . . - - - 4 _ _ _ >_ I� ( e'off- .��. = a_ aY- �� ��� i� M ° ..,, _. -ct' l®`�. • Y� .' -' ` -ned AIN ;�" is I 6`` s N.r. nYNr. tea. t t i e p ., r sue - 0 1 41111F ' d, - leirli 11 t�'adJr �t I ..............._......-..« ..__.........._.-. r!- 11‘ a %.•, "' . ,�a•.... , .e." •.a. -may • i _ .. •, /l A/—a I I-:Tr-r— WIINRT ... Wl..�...„Si Y _ _. Bu• TT AVE. S •'`a 1E5111111 ••!: •I » . L . . P®�. , !! >L u NINNININEI ew _ : + • r - .Il- t=. j sta1.ANIER 111 t _ �� - ._ il ' • • • • 41 Nero=»�' ou.ao t $ .'t( I sn 5-AP-u-y E _ _ Y O� i Lillian - so . e moon f Fr.„e 1' [� 1 31"� Z+0r ~ �' t It 1�.�C.I LUIT* •l A T f WILLIAMS AVE f .. ....,...\1` ,i".:t »?b .1 t — UM .. ^ ,_.NEN Li 4 ' 0 -NV- i 1 1 - -12 ‘- ,' • i.(1121120111 OOP. 44, a I ��������m � � ��� �� INSIMMINE t _ WELLS ... AVE. '. I — ItM ,WNW WELLS AVE f 0.F .OL Q RENTON - I/135 723150 WELLS AVE S. _. .. . `--• •,. / • 151 esa ,•k 1l`at1110\1 1 1..1.'111� � �:��► M 4 r� VA sue a• ,vE �.; ,©'Zl���j•.�..� iI ! Ittilli\I-s- v It •� L t tti.�''J g1p1 JS I• "'IrSP. • _ `�. _ .. . A•�,� ��� 1ZCA\• •A g" :? a '\ : N E�'Euz ?'�e ! to ��lc C o ©I ®� i ~ ®_�®����� _ ^'• g a F a aw`a > >+ 8� ..I''.•.I�.Im.l O' 1 a - t $ •r _ MAIM AVE f.... ` /A% •�. e t MAIM AJL. l L ® O ✓N-M/. 't I t MAIN AVE. S. tw _ J ' III ^' 1F• _ - - Re1, ~ • ,•, " ''' ��. <�Yta ,`.' '�OL�_ ��,4° Ill S.R.405;tW>ICML,)t :t N. ti 1� 115.21111IN!i, m. ' XT.*FAMpffM TO Jet W� "• /N ..: ` ; �... .... _a _,,. t om. �` Y �/a tL_LtnJ:frpt; �� t "To'N � .. . � �f ... .®,..,r •v/�'�" ��� `�".� a ,'►c E.' I E y . --' s-.t.:, ,t . :1- i . :1_ 1 : • .2r1'.1�;w'yj, A ',1 i ' '•••'%. O'� 24fe:4 -• - `.1;16511101d11111C �� ��� - I\ l t. �''' -k ,1 •+A;N. 0 © CITY OF RENTON sv- l , ), . Planning/Building/Public Works = < �� _ # J 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 • FE$ 2 3'0 0 1 e,/ 0 3 0 5 lil 1,11 . ; ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Q i / * art 715$401 u.s. POSTAGE f.7 Resident oc(1) 321 Smi ers Ave. So. - 'Rea , , WA 98055 NIT DELIYERAB LE u00e `' AS ADDRESSED 833 9 UNABLE TO FORWARD o w RETURN TO SENDER .w.., .""'- 6 6- Wd a' c,' Pit.Ak 'i,. lltittlttltllira!,lttltltttlltttitlttiltttltltltlttltltttlltl p CITY OF RENTON y , ru Planning/Building/Public Works ... a a v it 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 h FEB 2 3'O 0 :i•'�� • ,� o ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED _M. j 58401 � U.S. • STAGE AIP vi(yfe. / / / Ms. Jeanette Schultz 317 Smither Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 1 i T DEL , f E 000e - A 4 ' ' .S ! 41rAlli9 3 d 9 l 1' FORW-'+ t 0' jj ii y jj }} }} FF ii jj {{ jj ii`` R: RN TO SERI..R .`` 662,1 Wd P: `/� ! j 1t1}�tlillilf�itlftllitll!liiilllllitillilitill i- - - ��t�il�tiii��ttl4ff�il�i�ilf��i� 0 0 CITY OF RENTON t . ---k,,r.? 57:-,,,..„.7.,,•:-..=_., ... c... .., CO 4.0 ,;;, t. ........-.................0.........* ail Planning/Building/Public Works ,,._ .,:c o -,...---- f ,-.... 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 CO I- LU CiJ .67, 1 yt j UN 1 n 9 •,:' '.A'1;:':::11:::::::;1 c,E.4,.°,01•3s Twn! ;-•.1 •Ii:. ' ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED .‘ . .7) Steven. -."..lbert White •••-• . -,-..-est r _._...... 500 Wa-It .t-' #417 ..... Seattle. ..,' ' 98121 r , . , . . . „51.1 ,. . 6 aciarcutigt, -- — ..,... .." ,,..___321•••,-,..-ax.+--.-. ..-am.g.s.- x0 6 67 V ..-77---- ..., 81TOFORWA113 -C—,"'"—efi- _ ., ..„.. 1)'• Ali.. itT.7. "70'..7_,,':, IIIIHILililltiltiililliihElf11111111 i 111:flriN TO SENDtfl 6. lippmenr 111111111111111111111.11, -"411111111111111MENIMENIMME o _ OF RENTON ct, g isor Planning/Building/Public Works < 0 c" ( JUN 1 8'9 -2: 0 3 a 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 tiD w CC ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED iv-, pp I SOILTALAE31 pill*Alit Wesley Kelson 833 108Th Ave Ne Bellevue, WA 98004 -^cr: 710—T—D EL I VER A—B E N n r EIZ AS ADDRESSED ' cn UNABLE TO FORWARD 4.7*-- co RETURN TO SENDER '51 14V 4/)/ • earsys rre.2.7e=2. 47 31 1 a © CITY OF RENTON eigl Planning/Building/Public Works a �i Y.1• ''":.L ''- �� JUN 1 8'9 3 Z.,1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 a _ '' :^ ;� Q� .3 Q 5 Cl. u� H ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED WA 12042601 U.S. POSTAGE i; J Bert Roberts 280 Hardie Ave SW#4 Renton,WA 98055 ROBE280 980552026 1498 19 06/21/99 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND : J BERT ROBERTS & CO 10900 RAINIER AVE 5 SEATTLE WA 98178-3215 RETURN TO SENDER AUTO WINVW-:-.12- it,Iiiiiii►iliii i i„ill„siii„itiiilit;ii,iliIiiliii,,,ii,I , i p CITY OF RENTON _ �IT «,-.,ws, -- _ .,�— ..Ir` Planning/Building/Public Works '- < t� . r* o JUN8'99 4' '' ; 51055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 W 0 3Od r_,.a * o. w A 720426u U.S. PCSTA3E ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Resident 396 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD NO SUCH#f\. ATTEMPTED,NOT KNOWN REFUSED INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS MOVED,LEFT NO ADDRESS newACETI In.rr'r nrsrcrl Z. E',a "+9 8 6 5 5 HOTDELIVERABLE _ hnr ►else 43•>a2a2 II,I„l„1,11,,,,1,i„1,1,,,11,,,I,I„1j,,,1,l,l,l„l,i,,,ll,i t .'- : Alrt / i i ] f r . • L ' 711-1- i$. tit$44Attt. • opr .. t , • r f !!!!I!!!1!I ilflll, f�.-T--- II 4 V 11 III ;-r_ ' .4 imam • Ili iglu Ta, ■..s k February 26,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 54 and Mr. Boyns reported that the owners of the property to the north have expressed interest in purchasing the parcel. Mr. Boyns stated that the appraised value of the property is $10,000 if sold,or $800 per year if leased. A survey he conducted of City departments indicated that the property is not needed by the City and all departments supported selling the property except for the Economic Development Department who recommended leasing the property. In conclusion, Mr.Boyns said that staff recommends declaring the property surplus, accepting the appraised value of $10,000, and setting the compensation at the appraised value. Responding to Councilman Parker's inquiry regarding reimbursing the TIB funds,Mr.Boyns explained that the reimbursement is based on 80%of the net proceeds from the sale of the property. Responding to Council inquiry,Mr.Boyns said that the property was purchased by the City for approximately$258,000 and the square footage of the subject parcel is 2481 square feet. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL DECLARE THE PROPERTY SURPLUS, ACCEPT THE APPRAISED VALUE OF $10,000, SET COMPENSATION AT THE APPRAISED VALUE,AND ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE SALE. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2001 and beyond. Items noted included: * Renton Centennial banners are being installed on street poles at major intersections throughout the City. * More than 250 Renton area senior citizens attended the second annual Travel Seminar and Dinner presented by the Senior Activity Center on February 21 st. * The Skyhawks Sports Academy,in cooperation with the Recreation Division, conducted two sports camps for children during the mid-winter school break. AUDIENCE COMMENT Jeff Dineen, 320 Smithers Ave. S.,Renton, 98055, expressed his concerns Citizen Comment: Dineen— regarding the installation of a large exhaust fan at the northwest corner of an Burnett Ave S/S 4th St apartment complex located at S. 4th St. and Burnett Ave. S. The fan removes Apartment Complex Exhaust car exhaust from the apartment's parking garage. Mr.Dineen pointed out that Fan Installation the fan is located 20 feet from his property line and requested that the City investigate whether exposure to the car exhaust is harmful since it is known to �q61 ' �� contain numerous toxins and carcinogens. Mr. Dineen also expressed his Pt concern that neighboring property owners were not informed of changes to the building plan with regards to the exhaust fan installation. Mayor Tanner stated that he is aware of the problem. The matter is being investigated and the City will make sure that the fan complies with all noise ordinances and air quality regulations before and after it is installed. In regards to changes in the building plan,Mayor Tanner assured that there were no changes and the fan is shown on the electrical permit. Mayor Tanner stressed February 26,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 55 ( that the City will do everything necessary to make sure that the use of the fan does not have a detrimental impact on the neighborhood. j Mr. Dineen stated that it is difficult for the general public to research the City Code and development plans in order to field concerns about potential impacts from proposed neighborhood developments; and he suggested that the Development Services Department develop a checklist to assist lay people in their research of impacts such as fumes,noise, and traffic. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Administrator Gregg Zimmerman explained that projects that are reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee rarely are developed to the extent that the location of mechanical items is already known. Those additions are developed during the design phase and are reviewed upon submission of building plans and application for mechanical and electrical permits. Mr. Zimmerman explained that the exhaust fan would activate when the carbon monoxide level in the garage reaches a certain point. He detailed the acceptable and unacceptable levels of carbon monoxide and its effect on humans. Mr. Zimmerman said that the City is considering hiring a private consultant to assist in thoroughly reviewing the facts and to help in the testing [of the carbon monoxide levels. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Appeal: Heritage Renton Hill, City Clerk Division submitted appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision Renton Hill Community regarding Heritage Renton Hill Preliminary Plat(PP-00-053 &AAD-00-149); Association, (PP-00-053 & 57 single-family lots on 10.35 acres located in the vicinity of Beacon Way S., AAD-00-149) SE 7th Ct.,Jones Ave. S., and S. 7th St. Appeal filed by Renton Hill Community Association, accompanied by the required fee. Refer to Planning &Development Committee. CAG: 01-008, South City Clerk Division reported bid opening on 02/13/2001 for CAG-01-008, Downtown Water Main& South Downtown Water Main& Storm Sewer, Phase I; 16 bids;project Storm Sewer, Katspan estimate$1,079,726.98; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,Katspan,Inc., in the amount of$915,166.77. Council concur. CAG: 01-002,Trailer City Clerk Division reported bid opening on 02/13/2001 for CAG-01-002, Mounted 500 KW Engine Trailer Mounted 500 KW Engine Generator Set; 3 bids;project estimate Generator Set, Simpson Power $108,328.50; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the Products low bidder, Simpson Power Products, Ltd., in the amount of$105,157.38. Council concur. CAG: 99-082, City Hall Community Services Department submitted CAG-99-082, City Hall Parking Parking Garage Access Ramp, Garage Access Ramp;and recommended approval of the project, authorization Gary Merlino Const Co for final pay estimate in the amount of$18,222.29, commencement of 60-day lien period,and release of retained amount of$85,592.40 to Gary Merlino Construction Company,Inc.,contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Development Services: Development Services Division requested approval to hire a contract employee, Plumbing/Mechanical at a cost of$32,000,to provide building inspection and plan review services for Inspector Contract Employee four months while a Plumbing/Mechanical Inspector is on medical leave. Refer Temporary Hire to Finance Committee. February 26, 2001 The City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA, 98055 Dear Mayor and City Council members, Allow me to introduce myself, my name is Jeff Dineen and I reside at 320 Smithers Ave South in downtown Renton. I have a long history of involvement with downtown Renton. My property was originally purchased by my grandparents in the 1930's . I was the founder of the Renton Action Committee in 1986 which was responsible for the elimination of the of the infamous "Renton Loop" which plagued downtown Renton for years. I was a early member of the Renton Piazza Committee and have attended numerous planning groups concerning the downtown area. I have a proven record that demonstrates a genuine interest in my neighborhood and the area in which I live. My current concern involves the Fourth and Burnett Apartment development that is located directly behind me. This concern specifically involves the instillation of a large exhaust fan in the northwest corner of the building. This fan,roughly the size of a single car garage door,is designed to exhaust the two leveled parking garage of carbon monoxide fumes and has the potential of running 24 hours a day. This fan is located 20 feet from my property. As any home owner can understand, I am very concerned about the installation and operation of a fan of this size so close to my property. I would like to review with you my attempts to insure that the results of the development of this site end in a positive project for all parties concerned. On December of 1998 and again in March of 1998(see attachments#1 and#2)the adjoining property owners petitioned the City of Renton with concerns about the development of this site. In both petitions we expressed our concerns that all attempts be made to; 1. minimize the impact on neighboring properties. 2. maintain the existing quality of life for neighboring property owners. 3. make any and all planning concerning the site open and available to all parties of interest. On both of these occasions we were assured by both the Mayor and City Council that all efforts would be made to insure that existing property owners be kept informed about all aspects of the development of the site and that we would have opportunities to address concerns and seek mitigation in a early and orderly fashion. We were also informed that the potential developer,The Daily Homes, was known for its willingness to work with and be a good neighbor. On February 23, 1999 we received a memo from the City (see attachment #3) which states, "Planning for the property will be done by a private developer. However, city staff will keep interested parties informed through this letter, future letters and notices, and possibly future meetings to keep you informed about what's happening and where you will have opportunities to comment on the proposals." With this memo came a main floor plan for the building (see attachment#4). No were on this plan is there shown a large exhaust fan for the garage. The plans do show a stair case in the northwest corner of the building where the fan is currently located. On March 15, 1999 we received a letter from the City(see attachment#5) explaining measures to mitigate the buildings impact on the single-family homes to the west. The number of references in the letter to the alley and the west side of the project is a direct indication of the level of concern that had been expressed by the property owners to the west regarding the building. Again in this correspondence there was no discussion of a large exhaust fan on the west side of the building even though there is an acknowledgment of the level of concern expressed by the property owners located to the west of the building regarding its impact. On July 13, 1999 we received the "Environmental Review and Administration Land Use Action" (see attachment #6) which states on page 15 section 8, under the heading MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS "the proposed development would not generate any harmful and unhealthy conditions." There is a mention of increased noise due to increased traffic but no mention of large fans blowing toxic fumes. In this document we were presented with a floor plan(see attachment#7) that shows"trash access"and landscaping in the northwest corner of the building where the fan is currently located. In this document we were notified that we had until August 9, 1999 to file appeals to the environmental determination and/or land use decision. These documentation clearly indicates that; 1 the property owners to the west of the project have made every attempt to engage both the City of Renton and Dally Homes in order to insure the early and orderly mitigation of issues concerning the development. 2 the City of Renton and Dally Homes were fully aware of the level of concern expressed by the property owners to the west with regard to the buildings impact. 3 that there was a systematic lack of communication concerning the installation and operation of a large exhaust fan on the west side of the building and that it is impossible to seek mitigation and appeals to issues that people have no knowledge of. Consequently,I am formally expressing to you my concern regarding the installation and operation of this large exhaust fan. I have discussed my concerns with City officials and have been told that at this time nothing can be done with regards to the position and location of this large exhaust fan. I am therefore formally requesting the following 5 items; 1 The City of Renton acknowledge the potential for conflict with regards to the operation of this fan with the property owners to the west of the building. 2 The City of Renton provide property owners to the west of the building with a complete reference to city ordinances concerning noise and air quality that would apply to the operation of the fan. 3 The City of Renton reassure property owners to the west of the development that any violation to city ordinances concerning the operation of the fan be expeditiously dealt with. 4 The City of Renton acknowledge the fact that property owners to the west of the building were not informed of changes to the building plan with regards to the instillation of this large exhaust fan and that this delay has diminished the ability of neighboring property owners to mitigate concerns regarding the fan and its operation. 5 Since the purpose of the fan is to remove car exhaust,a substance that has been determined to be unhealthy to the occupants of the building, and since car exhaust is known to contain numerous toxins and carcinogens including but not limited to, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,sulfur dioxide,suspended particles including PM-10(particles less than 10 microns in size), benzene, formaldehyde and polycyclic hydrocarbons, and since this fan will be concentrating and blowing this exhaust 20 feet from my property, I am therefore formally requesting copies of the environmental impact analysis that documents that exposure to this exhaust will have no ill health effect on me and my family. Sincerely, e rey H Dineen 320 Smithers Ave South Renton WA 98055 (425)255-5652 ;///\ Dec . 7, 1998 The City of Renton 4/4-a(hriffiv+ 1055 South Grady Way Renton , Wa 98055 Dear Mayor and City Council , The property owners on the 300 Block of Smithers Ave South would like to publicly voice our collective concern about the proposed sale and development of the city owned property located at the corner of 4th and Burnett , formerly known as the Good Chevrolet truck piazza . We have concerns regarding the City' s narrow focus for this property . In our April petition to the City Council , we requested that " the City consider ALL possible uses for this property including long term parking" . Since this petition our only contact with the City concerning this property was the Nov . 30th meeting at which time three versions of the same plan for high density housing were presented with no discussion of alternative uses for the property . We feel that this action on the part of the City does not respect our April petition request and reinforces our impression that the City has only one vision for the property . We again request that the City consider ALL possible uses for this property including long term parking. We question the timing of this action . Property owners were notified of the Nov . 30th meeting during the Thanksgiving weekend with the meeting scheduled on the following Monday with City Council action scheduled for the next Monday . We question the need for such a speedy timeline for property which has been setting vacant for 2 years. Why not wait to see the success of the Daily project and the nature of the Boeing downturn before committing to such development . We have concerns regarding the soft and unstable nature of the soil in this area and its appropriateness for a project of this magnitude . We find the three proposals presented at the Nov 30th meeting unacceptable for the following reasons. (1 ) The alley access to the parking garage . A garage for 80 to 90 cars will generate about 200 car trips daily . There is no way that the alley will be able to absorb that volume of traffic while allowing current property owners reasonable access to their properties. (2 ) The height of the proposed building will dramatically impact light and openess for existing properties. (3) The sketches showing balconies on the alley side of the building. Five layers of balconies on the alley side of the building would dramaticlly impact privacy for existing homeowners. • (4) The impact - - property values for nel boring single family homes We feel strongly that ' any and all attemps are made to minimize the impact on neighboring property owners with regards to the future development of this property and we look forward to working with the City to insure that all parties interest are best served. r3a20 5 mi s Al/e S c;/ , A 3 3 E6 c5ri )--4,1)`53 (31,5 z,l u - 3/ C s Ave- zcieS o..�� 46- E- -) , Z 5.�,7 ,41-.-s /1-1/`e-.21-e-p 0-8 3 5 -e.s 40c 5 - /REO.eaCC.- 33 I N1Htle)(5AU/ . April 20 , 1998 a I A102 The City of Renton Municipal Building / a /� 200 MI11 Ave So Renton , WA 98055 Dear Mayor and City Council , We the undersigned property owners on the 300 Block of Smlthers Ave South would like to publicly voice our collective concern about the future sale , development and use of the city owned property located at the corner of 4th and Burnett , formerly known as the Good Chevrolet truck plaza. Our concern centers on the fact that this property interfaces an area that has historically been devoted to single family dwellings. A character that the City help to foster in the 70's and 80's through low Interest home improvement loans. We feel strongly that : (1 ) any development of the forementioned property reflect and respect the nature of this interface , (2) any and all planning concerning this property be made available and open to all parties of interest , (3) the City consider ALL possible uses for this property including long term parking, a need that has been well documented numerous times for the down town area, (4) any decision for long term use or sale of the property be made by a representative group which includes representation from neighboring property owners. We are well aware and supportive of the need for change and development in the down town area, but we are also concered about maintaining the quality of life that we have worked to develope . We look forward to working with the City to Insure that all parties interests are best rved in regards to this matter . Sincerely , Page 2 rr February 23, 1999 4114 COMMENTS & CONCERNS RESPONSES & POSSIBLE ACTIONS Providing a transition from a more Transition can be addressed through the types commercial-type area of downtown to a more of uses on the site and the size and design of residential-type area, including shadows and the building. Given the downtown commercial impacts on privacy. location and what's allowed under the zoning, the mix of residential and commercial uses and the proposed height provide a reasonable transition of uses. Light and shadow impacts will be reviewed through the environmental process once an actual project is proposed. At that time,the City could require a shadow study and work with the applicant on building design to"soften"the impacts on the adjacent residential uses. Any&all planning for property be made Planning for the property will be done by a available & open to parties of interest. private developer. However,city staff will keep interested parties informed through this letter, future letters and notices, and possibly future meetings to keep you informed about what's happening and where you will have opportunities to comment on the proposals. Decisions for long-term use or sale of property The City Council already determined the be made by a representative group, including possible uses on the property with the adoption neighboring property owners. of the downtown plan and zoning in 1993. The ultimate decision on the sale of the property will also be made by the City Council and if you were sent this letter,you will be notified of any future meetings. Providing adequate on-site parking for any The site is in the parking exempt area of development that occurs. downtown,meaning there is no requirement to provide parking for either residential or commercial uses. However,parking is important to the neighborhood as well as to the future residents. Staff will work with the applicant and through the environmental review process to ensure there is parking provided for the residential component of the project. On street parking along Burnett should be more than adequate for retail customers. r Egt ,-,f-- cn op all ¢i 41 3') s7 ;f 3s ;. rl zi Ls is :I u,,„v i' 7 Z t--+ \<\ 1 i0 i' Je 8 00 i f)4, w 111 , ,� ry irilliP IN.. 1 L 4 5 4 -I g , le 0 l5 14 iT ltill \— il NV \ ammo= Upper Level Plan {,ANO SaAVE SO V-FE-72-, H - �� ,- t a2 X%'S'L. i/ Mg '�11t l 44 o I i s•f s. S. IS zo- 'T•I 12- RFs't. pi al :a v .. JQi i�Il II�II�I ti �. . .. .t. e . h �� N wool C. v I + ` ````N.•k* 6 , . .. 12 I I. IT IL. 17 IB ii =o z,90o G� .V._.,1.4 -1- - ,IIIII \ `�a \ \j7+nrNTi ha- ,,,,,,,../F.011lt "''Ta w/T wr.l N.•.A.-S A6eve Main Floor Plan - Z,0lo r • 20•-0• 4 t h & Burnett ;;;:" 7.730;12 41 2 BR Fo.vnl1onic.s CO Live - Work Development Study „:3 M1 'I' IiUN Pork log Slke-, 88 PART M C It S F--= CIT' OF RENTON Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Planning Susan Carlson,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor / AHachmrs* March 15, 1999 l SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT-- CITY-OWNED SURPLUS PROPERTY AT 4TH& BURNETT Dear Interested Citizens: The purpose of this letter is to update you on the status of the city's efforts to sell the property at the corner of S. 4th Street and Burnett Avenue in downtown Renton. This is a follow-up to the letter of February 23, 1999. Included in this letter is a brief summary of the proposal to develop the property if the sale goes through. A copy of the proposal is available for review at City Hall, 6th floor. The city received letters of interest from four potential buyers in January and then requested additional information and somewhat more detailed proposals for the eventual development of the property. Only one of the four,Dally Homes,responded to the proposal request. Based on the proposal,city staff began negotiations with Dally Homes. Staff expects to present a recommendation to the City Council at 6:30 p.m. during the Committee of the Whole on Monday,March 22, 1999. The Council may authorize staff to proceed with the sale at the regular Council meeting immediately following at 7:30 p.m. Although the Council will not be holding a public hearing,public comment at the Council meeting immediately following at 7:30 p.m. or by letter is always welcome. If the Council approves the sale,Dally Homes would then continue their work on preparing plans for the site. • It is important to note that the Council approval of the sale is NOT the same as approving the final project. Approval of any plans for developing the property would still be required to go through the city's regular permit and approval process. I hope this information is helpful to you. If you have any questions, or would like to meet with city staff to discuss any items related to this property,please feel free to contact me at 425-430- 6590. Thank you for your interest in this matter. Sincerely, 2/rifi &/' Michael D. Kattermann,AICP Planning Director cc: Mayor Tanner City Council Members Jay Covington Sue Carlson c:\document\downtown\redevdis\surpres2.doc 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 .fi 539 Burnett Avenue Proposal The 339 Burnett Avenue Project will be an urban, high quality mixed-use apartment/retail building which will be very similar to Renaissance at Renton or any one of the new low rise mixed-use buildings in Belltown, Seattle. This project, along with the Renaissance, the "Market" building and Metro station will be the first four buildings to be constructed in the downtown redevelopment district. The 339 Burnett Avenue Project will be designed and will be primarily marketed to two renter profiles: 1. The urban-lifestyle single person who works in the immediate area and earns an average income. This renter (particularly the single woman) wants a security building with "no kids next door", but they don't want to have to drive to Bellevue or Kirkland to rent a quality apartment. 2. The retired couple or single person with Renton "roots" who wants to live an active lifestyle in an elevator-served , secured building and be close to everything in an urban environment. Our proposed building will offer quality of lifestyle and location to both of these renter profiles. In addition, it is designed to meet many of their leisure needs. It will have an extensively landscaped courtyard on the west side with park benches and accent lights at the plaza level. In addition, there will be a Jacuzzi tub with surrounding landscaping and patio furniture. The inside amenity will feature a "theme" lobby at ground level and a community lounge area on the second level. A "grand staircase" will connect these areas. In addition, there will be a large, fully equipped exercise room and on-site management will provide access for in and out-going laundry, package mail and video rental services. Our mixed-use (apartment/retail) design concept will include the maximum density of .58 apartment units, five of which will be live/work lofts (same concept as Lions Gate in Redmond) and approximately 7,626 square feet of retail. We will incorporate 76 parking spaces in a two (2) level post-tension (PT) concrete garage. In order to minimize excavation and maximize parking spaces, the lower level will be approximately three to four feet below existing grade. The west side (adjacent to the alley) both at grade level and at the Plaza (second) level will be screened from the single family homes west of the alley by landscaping. The retail space will be ground level street related along Burnett and at the corner of 4th and Burnett. We will also include a total of 5 "live/work" apartment lofts on the east side of the building on Burnett and the north end of the building on 4th Street. A 3-story wood frame apartment structure comprising of the 58 units will be built on top of the PT garage at the Plaza level. To mitigate the building's bulk, scale and height on the single-family homes to the west, Daily homes is proposing the following: a.) 65% of the west building elevation at the alley level will be set back approximately 12 feet and landscaping (tall trees) will be planted in this area. b.) Approximately 50% of the west elevation of the wood frame structure at the Plaza level and up will be set back from the alley 45 feet with trees planted adjacent to the west side of the Plaza further buffering the building from the single family homes. This set back area • 339 Burnett Avenue Proposal becomes the outside patio amenity for the project while minimizing the effect of the total 4 story building on the homes to the west. c.) It should be noted that both of the units at the northwest corner of the second and third residential floors will be set back (about 12 feet) which will open up 75% of the alley elevation on the top two (2) floors. The exterior of the building will have a craftsman design character, somewhat similar to the Renaissance at Renton.' The street frontage along Burnett and 4th Street will feature both large bay retail/commercial space and the small bay commercial space of the 5-live/work lofts. We will incorporate a sidewalk canopy and the front elevation of the building will consist of colored split face block, slate and stucco. The remainder of the elevation may use a combination of horizontal, board and batt and shake siding. Roof accent elements will utilize metal or asphalt shingle material. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir_.....ental Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 15 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 AuI4.cii,, y 442 (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful ' impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a residential population. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND There are adequate and available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed development. A discussion of existing utilities and planned improvements is provided in the advisory notes section of this report. The applicant will be assessed fire, traffic and park mitigation fees to compensate for the increased demand on public services. (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would redevelop and improve a site presently used as a parking lot. The investment in the area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. FINDINGS;CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the Fourth and Burnett Apartments. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 14. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Downtown (CD). SITERC m , _ --- ___-- _----_ ;41 _ . :,,ii,(4510.2A--'',, -- • I 1 .....,, _.....--:•0 - _ 1150516.111,; - . . --•"v1 A1014.-3141 ?Wise.' - • ' •e. ,•'• •••.• ....••••••7,4;;Y•.7", ;;-' ion 1+10a3 si. , . • :...:.. :,.., , ,:.,i,..--.,-r; , - •. • :.•••..••.,•••..-......r•;,•:•*,!•11,17.•;• .t.t.. -• . •• -, ..-•.., ,.. ..:.1,.:....!...; -law • • D , ilm . . • •,:-.. •-:•.• •;•...A...1:,....:,•:.....,:Vi i ID tzopl • _ ..., ........„.......„......„.,......,4,........v.i,..„ le fril Iiii . _ .... :......,...::•.......,„...??4,„.....t:.:,..,..,.,,..,,r,„... .,; ..,,..,...,,, ••-•, • .. ••• --,..s....—is:so... . . . . . Ili III I . .. .4 ; • • ••* ••••;..." , •:•••••.••••1•Y'..5.•,‘••it..5.•;917‘7YeitO! _ ' :II- . • . • • ••!•-;',11 i.„, •-...,....,,,• •••,- '. Of6i. I • I . . ••-;. . • •••-•' :•.:'-13,T,Rf...r4".. .1*•-.t'lrerlit 1▪ [1 if : . . . .., .. .,.. .... .• .,-..;ep. ,,,,::::::-;7,....0.h-' ... giT'-:,I 0,11i 1 , i _ = ‘.... ... •:^••• ''.-"::: "^-,.'....5,1:11;;;:i.::-''' ', .:,•;;!,'4?.;' ,,,t,' ‘ ,.> r --, - ... :-. .:.-: ,P,..........., ,........ .*.•.,-.-.N., •-•-•'''.''''r.r1 !:".:''''''4* . . ... ..:‘,.:7..,r r :...-- . .Z. .4....,....0...:. • :1;:+:. - ,..,......! - .... ...3•• •5 -''';et'74-1,4. Z':4•11.for P.5 , Cr •i: C . ••••••:•-•,•••; , •••• ••-••'.•••••',•••••••••••• '•••••••1•:•,;!...4•4; •••,r;.;10•A;k4, 4•;,..;1 4- .• •1. . J •t i 4 4 I •• ,. •-• - •• = _a p- : i 1 i i i 1 N 1 4 X ,..7t1i•;:•••+' 4•;/:'•• „., :•'•t• :441 . i i ..- , •• .-*.Ul ' • : ••••. • • • ••:-;,...•;••,••„•••••141;•",,,t, .... ;•;--,•••25:1k. //40110 1:1 .11 •- • „.....,••':“.• ,,...‘•;•„....-4••••••.,,,, •Cren •-•.:••• Y,d•;• . .PI • • •• ;; va„-.,.41, .....iirf.i., .c., i -.. • h . -.-,... .--,.:'•:- 1 . . - . . . ... ,..,,:.-. .......,...,,t.,-.:A4....::.:. 17 : ,..I., .., -,....., .• „ ; ........,:-..-- 1 „ • • " ••••.-.--•••••,..,..-;F•i•,•::••:•,...;••:•••••••••••T .7 •.•••••••: •••••••:•,.;•:,;.•,••,•;',F.;•••••••;:•i•C.4 11 • . • •• '• %••••.••....' .•,.•••••••••,•6•eL,-,••••• i ... •; • •• •; •;;:•;A,••..,•••••:••••,:;;;; ;•:;.;ifi.•::;!;;.';;trlgI.;., . •• ; .....,7.1L;•••:,,,,.7-:...,4.4.4-...'414;isep —1_ . .• .-.• •..••••..'f,,rt:••:.^ , . . ... . ..... ,..,. .:. •!•••• !..?v',',".01:;1• - A. .--- •••,• • • , • , ., il . . . 1 •:- 0 _ z u: 1.12,10N 11 M.LI.P. 5E,T CATE BY INSCRIPTiom TH01Hs I I BURNETT MIXED USE Way, 30 ;1 i1 i4 „ ,.t; CITY F RENTON „LL ” wig Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 24, 2000 Mr. Jim Schmidt Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue E Seattle, WA. 98102 SUBJECT: Site Plan Revision for Fourth and Burnett Apartments (LUA99-090, SA-A, ECF) Dear Mr. Schmidt: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revision to the Fourth and Burnett Apartments site plan. The Zoning Administrator approved the original site plan on July 20, 1999. The proposed revision would eliminate the "work" portion of the five (5) "Live/Work" units located at the south end of the building on S. 4th Street. This change would affect primarily the lower floor of these units that were initially planned for work space and would now become part of the living space of the residential unit above. The five units would become townhome style units. The proposed revision does not change the overall number of residential units that were approved. The commercial space on Burnett Avenue S. also remains unchanged. The site plan regulations define a major adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as a "substantial change in the basic site design plan, intensity, density, use and the like generally involving more than a ten percent (10%) change in area or scale." (Section 4-9-200G). The proposed revision would not change the building footprint on the site or the total number of residential units that were approved under the site plan. Therefore, the proposed change is considered a minor modification to the approved site plan and the revision is approved. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the project. This decision to approve the revisions as a minor modification will have a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. PMT reductions (81/2 x 11)of each revised sheet must be submitted for the file records. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7218. Sincerely, Jana Hanson Zoning Administrator cc: Parties of Record 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer February 8,2000 Peter Rosen Renton City Hall 5th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE:Burnett Station Apartments Dear Peter, As per our conversation this morning,Daily Homes is requesting a Site Plan Modification to our Burnett Station Apartment project,located at 339 Burnett Ave. S. The revision to the plan we are proposing involves eliminating the"work"portion of the five(5) "Live/Work"units located on the south end of the building on 4th Ave.This change affects primarily only the lower floor of these units in that the lower floor would now become part of the living space of the unit above.These five units would become townhome style units.The commercial space on Burnett Ave remains unchanged. Sincerely, Jim Schmidt Project Manager Daily Homes Inc. cc: Don Dally Charlie Laboda Lai 1 ! LiJ m! I, ( CC tl ;, qt. \\ EQ 0 j. ii = nI 1- RM ' 7 - � 1 = 2 '' " -CI' ruk __:_L. .. a _ ... . . 0 .-:.-.. .1 o ❑ a 4 . L_ I-- / / j I I . 11 VAS:- 3_fit 4.6rr e N I 41ryry// ' / ,+`.,+1 �`.�t __ rr • ,,,•- a4 - �./. � FE-t r. r iU 2 2• dr y.` _ Liii2 . ',. / A4 n2/ e:4.iiii,2 , -- .4BURNETT AVENUE 36'-0" 12'-6" _-_ ROOT BARRIER ON WEST IIV _____ SIDE OF TREE PIT, I_i L-- THESE TREES ONLY -- - fr 1. D © I tz F.. `_ s __ PLANTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME / NOTES COMMON NAME NOTES TREES 1. ALL THE TREES HAVE BEEN PURCHASED BY THE CITY OF RENTON AND ME BEING HEL THE NURSERY.THE CONTRACTOR'S BID PRICE SHALL INCLUDE ALL INSTALLATION AND GUARANTEE COSTS.THE CITY OF RENTON WILL PAY FOR SHIPPING TO THE JOB SITE.A FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA 4 1/2"CALIPER,0 TIME THE CONTRACTOR ACCEPTS THE TREES FROM THE NURSERY,THE CONTRACTOR A( .'"Al....How.---=----- PATMORE'/ PATMORE ASH B&B FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR QUALITY AND GUARANTEE OF THE TREES.IF,BEFORE ACCEPT ® OF THE TREES FROM THE NURSERY,THE CONTRACTOR FEELS THE MATERIAL CANNOT BI PYRUS CALLERYANA 'BRADFORD'/ 4" CALIPER,B&B © GUARANTEED OR DOES NOT MEET THE SPECIFICATION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BRADFORD FLOWERING PEAR ® CITY OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PURCHASE AND IN ACER RUBRUM 'BOWHAL" , 4"CALIPER,B&BQ 5 ALL OTHER MATERIALS. � BOWHALL RED MAPLE �/ 2. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE LAYOUT OF PLANTS IN FIELD BY CONTRACTOR BE �l ® L3.2 ����/// PLANTING BEGINS. - —T 3. ALL SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 6"MINIMUM OF TOPSOIL PER SHRUBS `�— DETAIL 2/L3.2 AND 2" DEPTH MULCH. u'etrirop PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS 'OTTO 3 GALLON,3'-0"O.C. Ank ''t'e"4"4tr81 LUYKEN'/ OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL ILEX CRENATA 'CONVEXA'/JAPANESE HOLLY 3 GALLON,3'0"O.C. aikRV GROUND COVER HYSTR OHN'S WORT NUM / 1 GALLON,1'-6"O.C.Aft VP 1701 Commerce NAKANOA Tacoma,9,aehingtan SSOCIATES Lu Job No.. 97032.00 Ref.North Memtt+ParJ�' 9e402-3207 �'dexpe ��R'A���< <2s313e3-e7oD (253)383-8728 fax 303 Rut SeaPDK,Sotto 1000 ta1206 292 9392 1000 Lenora St. W ttle 98122 fax 206 292 9640 MwMere of Mchitect,a Suite 405 NI motwbl TM Jrrurican lkban pee"poring constitutes u. Institute of Planning Ion Seattle,20 ington w w. �'�' Mt M afro Ll.a,47.a' 0' 10' 20' 40' kn teete Interior Design (208)223-2742 .ww.t tn..rnten ronemt of ow NsOt . (206)622-9462 fan }4�,�..: ) CCIT OF RENTON ..ii. ',.. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • August 16, 1999 Mr. Charlie Laboda Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Fourth and Burnett Apartments Project No. LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF i Dear Mr. Laboda: This letter is to inform you that the appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated and the administrative Site Plan Approval, for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. The decisions are final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Parties of Record FINAL2.DOC 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 y CITY (.5A RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 12, 1999 Mr. Charlie Laboda Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East Seattle,WA 98104 SUBJECT: Fourth and Burnett Apartments Project No. LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Laboda: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Parties of Record DOCUMENT1 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 Ica_. VA7."Z V I 'I In ii °�C�OPMENT 0 IB'1 ii �'OF REP INNING /� Jul 2 d 1999 DALLY HOMES RCF/V I S ( OR P U R ., T I I) �D • July 27, 1999 Peter Rosen, Project Manager City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments Project No. LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF Dear Peter, I am in receipt of your letter dated July 22, 1999 regarding the above referenced project. I would like to clarify a few points. First,the apartment project will consist of 58 units and 6822 square feet of retail space. Secondly, it is unreasonable to require 6 fire hydrants for the project and a looped water system. According to Kayren Kittrick, the water lines available at the site are adequate to meet the Fire Departments requirements. I will try to pursue this matter with the Fire Department. Sincerely, it,r ly Hoes Inc. ..7 c °,,,,, (4 ,m e aboda Vice President 3316 FUHRMAN AVE.E. • SUITE 100 • SEAITLE,WA 98102 • (206)328-3770 • FAX(206)328-6909 • #DALLYHI120L7 Ars t • recycled paper REC-ffir'ID Ma JUL 2 6 1999 ic IU / OW , ECONEIGH AND STRATEGIC.4 ,rMOW ;in.-t�C. DALLY HOMES July 23, 1999 INCORPORATED "Exceptional Quality Timeless Value' Via Facsimile (425) 430-7300 Sue Carlson Economic Development and Strategic Planning Director City of Renton 1055 S. Grade Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: 339 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH PROJECT Dear Sue: In regards to the Renton Fire Department's concern as to alley width immediately west of our proposed project, we would like to address it as follows: 1. We will accept the City's recommended solution of affording the Fire Department a 20 foot alley width for the entire length of the site. This will require us to give a 4 foot special easement(approximately 880 square feet)to the City. By doing so,there will be a 20' alley way for fire trucks adjacent to the project. (It should be pointed out that the remainder of the alley's center line will not line up). 2. By accepting the City's recommendation we ask that the following conditions be included as part of the agreement: a. The plaza level (R-1)be allowed to cantilever 4' over the alley easement as long as there is 14 feet of clearance for fire truck access below. b. That the reduction of 880 square feet will not effect the maximum allowable density of 58 units. c. That the City and Fire Department understand that we are doing this in"good faith"and that the alley width problem at the Sheridan site will be solved allowing the 115 foot wide Park and Ride Garage structure,which is critical to making the project feasible. In addition, that the solution will not add major costs to the project. 3316 FUHRMAN AVE.E. • SUITE 100 • SEATTLE,WA 98102 • (206)328-3770 • FAX(206)328-6909 • #DALLYHI120L7 ►�$ recycled paper Sue Carlson July 23, 1999 Page Two Based on our verbal agreement of the above, we will proceed to change the Burnett construction plans to meet the City's 20 foot alley width requirement. If the above is not to your agreement please let me know immediately. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Donald F. Dally President DFD/cjn cc: Charlie Laboda Scott Harkey—Thomas Harkey Architects Betty Nokes—Director Economic Development Ed Walker—King County Department of Transportation REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: July 13, 1999 (Revised July 20, 1999) Project Name: Fourth and Burnett Apartments Applicant: Daily Homes Owner: City of Renton File Number: LUA-099-090, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4th Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4th Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. Project Location: 339 Burnett Avenue S. Exist. Bldg. Area: NA Proposed New Bldg. Area: 87,103 sq. ft. Site Area: 25,300 sq. ft. Total Building Area: NA -1` rs Ais ea.\ , oft , i : •. /Y i .. EK•la �iTd-..'_l � 2 =1. 0li��Kp;. z 'i 3. Eyes: =1' • _' I_ ,y -- L ,. 4. +:.d �. . 0 re redrn . '-,1% 1B� .�. 9 !��s I 'f'P .�uc e[ 1. '� 101ia�6. 74_ 'y~.; 1�_� �, f• J. - ,�,,,. ,� ,: I it a R ,���111 ,1 11 � r '+��?r � . .MPS sdlr rim 1 1fre, ,..% 1 ate' ! •_�_'''' � o m I Fa i - - �' �' . , .... � numI mc7 1 -li ii a ''. �IIIO J®-` 1 ,;� € ��i•nv„. ' Yam ! 'a�0 ea fl .> - I`►ma•ate. ,10 p...., _gifry-.30 ii�3slier •- ��i , , wai e ,„ ^jam ERE. , �3-' mod il...7Z 10 i,L z,.it",.. 1.1.4.7-21*„ .. ...,taT,E6E1 F...-Y ,....., ;j' Project Location Map 's-.j iSaarita ffi •, �: SITERC . a a,,Z g? a sc.Ors ' \ rr. , . {, • Ciiy of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn it Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 2 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4th Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4`h Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A landscaped courtyard for apartment residents is proposed over the upper garage on the west side of the building open to the alley. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is basically flat and completely paved with asphalt. The pavement slopes westerly approximately 2% to 4% towards the alley. The lower level of the parking garage would require excavating approximately 3 feet below the existing grade. The applicant has not provided an estimate of the quantity of fill material or grading anticipated with the proposal. A geotechnical report for the proposal has been prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. Based on soil boring tests, the consultant concluded that the loose fill and alluvial deposits that underlie the site would not be suitable for supporting the proposed structure because of the potential for excessive post-construction settlement. The report recommends deep foundations consisting of augercast concrete piers as the most appropriate type of foundation support considering the size of the planned building, the presence of nearby structures, and the soil and groundwater conditions that underlie the site. The piers would extend through the fill and loose soils into the underlying dense sands and gravels. SITERC • Ciiy of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn it Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 3 of I REVISED JULY 20, 1999 Due to the presence of conventionally-supported buildings in the vicinity, it would be important to minimize ground vibrations during the earthwork and foundation construction. The geotechnical report states that the augercast pier installation should result in no perceptible vibrations. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to follow the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and Construction Mitigation Plan, approved prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated May 5, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance. 2. Water Impacts: As the site is currently paved, no net increase in runoff is anticipated. Runoff from the proposed structure would be collected and conveyed underground to the existing storm sewer conveyance system. The volume of runoff would not increase from existing conditions. Water quality may improve since the existing asphalt pavement used by vehicles would be replaced by rooftop. The covered parking garage would have floor drains connected directly to the sanitary sewer system. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 3. Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City and would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction at a rate of $388 per multi-family unit, and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee for the 58 multi-family units is estimated to be $22,504 (58 units X $388 = $22,504). Fire mitigation fees for the commercial portion of the building is estimated to be $3,479.84 (6,692 sq. ft. X $0.52 = $3,479.84). The total Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $25,983.84. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi-family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance, Environmental Review (SEPA) SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environrr I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 4 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 4. Transportation Impacts: A 72-space parking garage for apartment residents is proposed on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4th Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. The parking garage entrance is located at the southwest end of the building, approximately 60 feet up the alley from South 4th Street. There are several residences to the west of the subject property that use the common alley for access to their garages and parking. Residents have expressed concern that vehicles entering and exiting the parking garage via the alley would impact their access from the alley. It is estimated that proposed apartments would generate approximately 268 average daily trips. The alley meets City street standards for driveway width in multi-family developments. Plan Review staff has determined the width is sufficient for vehicle access and turning movements for the existing residents and the added traffic that would result under the proposal. The proposed multi-family and commercial development would result in an increase in the number of traffic trips on the local street system. However, the amount of additional traffic that would be generated is not anticipated to result in a significant impact on the street system. A Traffic Mitigation Fee will be assessed based on the number of average daily trips that are attributed to the proposed development. The number of trips is based on standards from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. It is estimated that the residential and commercial components of the proposal would result in a total net increase of 307.8 average daily trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per average daily trip. The traffic mitigation fee is thus estimated to be $23,085. The proposal includes a parking garage with 72 parking stalls to serve the 58 residential apartment units. The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area which specifically exempts development projects from on-site parking code requirements. The proposal would provide parking at a ratio of 1.24 spaces per dwelling unit. The Parking Code requires 1.5 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling unit and then 1 guest parking space per 4 dwelling units, which if applied to the proposal would equal a total of 102 spaces. The project site is located in close proximity to the Renton Transit Center so it is likely that residents of the proposed project would utilize transit at a proportionately higher rate. The City is planning improvements to Burnett Avenue S. and parking would be reconfigured to provide head-in parking along the frontage of the subject property. This parking would front the commercial lease space on Burnett Ave. S. and serve the parking needs of the commercial component of the proposal. These parking spaces could also provide for overnight parking for the apartment residents. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan stating that construction hours would be limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. Construction activity within 300 feet of residential areas is limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn 1 Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 5 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 5. Parks and Recreation Impacts: The proposal would result in construction of 58 multi-family residential units. Future residents would make use of existing and future City park and recreation facilities throughout the City. In order to mitigate the impact of the development on the City's parks and recreation facilities the City has adopted a mitigation fee of $354.51 per new multi-family dwelling unit. The Park's Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $20,561.58. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 6. Environmental Health/Noise Impacts: Development of the site would result in noise impacts. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, estimated to be have a total duration of approximately 12 months (October 1999 to October 2000). Construction activity within 300 feet of residential areas is limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which includes measures to minimize construction impacts. Construction equipment noise would be mitigated by muffling equipment as required per standard construction standards and dust would be controlled using best management construction practices. The noise impacts are not considered significant due to the limited duration of the construction period and mitigations restricting the hours of construction and minimizing equipment noise. Construction of building foundations would consist of augercast concrete piers to extend through the loose fill and alluvial soils underlying the site. The geotechnical report recommends this type of deep foundation construction to minimize the impact of ground vibrations during the earthwork and foundation construction on conventionally- supported buildings in the vicinity. The geotechnical report states that the augercast pier installation should result in no perceptible vibrations. Future residents of the proposed project would be subjected to noise and activity normal to an urban center. The project site is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing Renton Airport. Aircraft fly at low altitudes over or in the near vicinity of the site. Noise from aircraft could impact future residents of the apartment proposal. The applicant should consider this impact and incorporate insulation and sound-deadening design materials. After completion of the project, there would be noise impacts of increased traffic and impacts from activities normally associated with an introduced residential population. The Comprehensive Plan and zoning envisions downtown Renton as an urban center SITERC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn it Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 6 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 with a variety of residential and commercial uses developed at a high-density, intensity level. The potential conflicts between uses and impacts of airport and transit noise were known factors with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for downtown. The potential noise impacts on residents are not considered of a significant magnitude to warrant imposition of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 7. Land Use and Aesthetics Impacts: The subject site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) Comprehensive Plan map and Zoning designation. The proposal includes multi-family residential and commercial uses which are consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the uses permitted in the CD zoning designation. Potential impacts of residential uses in the downtown were evaluated during the process of adopting the Comprehensive Plan and implementing zoning. It is anticipated that the proposed residential and commercial uses would be compatible with existing, surrounding land uses and the future land use types envisioned under the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The average height of the proposed building at the parapets is approximately 49 feet above the ground level. The maximum building height is 59 feet, at the stair penthouse on the roof. The highest building elevation would be approximately 96 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA. B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Issue DNS-M with 15 day Period. Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environr al Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 7 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated May 5, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi- family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi- family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Use the current UBC Code: 1997. Field monitoring per soils report required. Windows for light, ventilation, egress to open on yard or courtyard. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 6,000 GPM. Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and the secondary hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building, 2. An approved fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire Department recommends a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit and 1 guest space for every two dwelling units. These spaces should be in addition to the parking required to support the retail/commercial activities, which are proposed for the ground floor. Note: The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area and is therefore exempt from all parking requirements. PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -There are existing 12-inch, 6-inch, 4-inch and 8-inch diameter water lines surrounding this property. The project is served by the 196 pressure zone. The proposed project is not located in either APA zone. SEWER—An 8-inch diameter sewer main is located in the alley behind the proposed project. STORM - A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream public drainage facilities exist to serve the site. STREETS — All the streets are paved. Burnett Avenue is currently under design for reconfiguration at S 3`d Street. Any damaged or sub-standard frontage improvements will be required to meet city standards. SITERC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn ?l Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 8 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.113 per square foot of property for a fee of$2,862.86. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 2. It may be required to upgrade one or more small diameter water line in the vicinity to obtain appropriate fire flow for the proposed project depending on fire department requirements. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.078 per square foot of property for a fee of$1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface for a fee of$1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. AIRPORT The proposed project is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing the Renton Airport. The airport is open for use by aircraft 24-hours per day. Residents of the premises throughout the 24-hour period may hear the noise made by these aircraft. This should be considered during insulation and sound deadening design determinations. The proposed project is located within 10,000 feet of the runway, beneath the 179—foot elevation above sea level height restriction. The proposed project lists a 50-foot above ground level height. PARKS Recommend street trees and grates on South 4th Street rather than shrubs. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 1999 (14 days from the date of publication). Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn it Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 9 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Cover Sheet/Project Information/Vicinity Map, (Received June 11, 1999) Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Site Plan, (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, G-1 Level Floor Plan (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, G-2 Level Floor Plan (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, R-1 Level Floor Plan (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, R-2 Level Floor Plan, (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 7, R-3 Level Floor Plan (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing No. 8, Roof Plan (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 10:Drawing No. 9, Building Elevations (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 11:Drawing No. 10, Building Elevations (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 12:Drawing No. 11, Topographic Survey (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 13:Drawing No. 12, Landscape Plan (Received June 11, 1999). Exhibit No. 14:Drawing No. 13, Courtyard Landscape Plan, (Received June 11, 1999). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn PI Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 10 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The site is designated Center Downtown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The intent of the designation is to "create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton" and to "reinforce downtown Renton as the regional commercial district in the City". (Objectives DT-A and DT-B) The proposal is consistent with the following Downtown Element policies. Policy DT-1. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and residential, which generate the demand for goods and services. The proposed residential and retail uses are appropriate to the designation. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. The net density of the proposal is 100 units per acre. Policy DT-4. Ground floor uses with street frontage along Wells Avenue South between Houser Way and South 2nd Street and along South 3rd Street between Main Avenue South and Burnett Avenue South should be limited to businesses which primarily cater to walk-in customer traffic (i.e. retail goods and services) in order to generate and maintain continuous pedestrian activity in these areas. Walk-in customer oriented businesses should also be encouraged to locate along street frontages in the remainder of the Historic Downtown Core district and the West End district. Although outside the areas identified in Policy DT-4, the ground floor commercial uses along the Burnett Avenue street frontage would cater to walk-in customer traffic. Policy DT-5. Redevelopment of the downtown area should be encouraged to maintain and revitalize the downtown core. The proposal would revitalize the downtown both through the addition of consumer opportunities and the creation of a 24-hour residential population. Policy DT-6. The redevelopment of downtown Renton as a multi-use Urban Center should be encouraged to create a center for the community. Policy DT-8. Development in the Center Downtown designation should conform to the Downtown Renton Association's Vision. The proposal is consistent with the DRA's Vision. Policy DT-15. Mixed use office and residential development may reach heights of 6-10 (medium rise) stories depending on other applicable ordinances (i.e. seismic considerations, airport flight patterns, and aquifer protection areas). The proposal is considered low-rise (1-5 stories in Downtown Element). The proposed residential density is at the maximum permitted. Policy DT-22. Maximize the use of existing urban services and civic amenities and revitalize the City's downtown by promoting medium to high density residential development in the downtown area. Allowed densities will conform to the criteria for Urban Centers in the countywide policies. SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department 4dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 11 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 Policy DT-23. Mixed use development where residential, commercial and office uses are allowed in the same building or on the same site, should be encouraged in downtown areas that are suitable for residential development. Incentives should be developed to encourage future development or redevelopment projects that incorporate residential uses. Policy DT-24. Net residential development densities in the downtown area should achieve a range of 25-100 dwelling units per acre. Where parcels are less than one half acre no minimum density is required. The proposal density of 100 dwelling units per acre meets the high end range of the policy. Policy DT-28. Unusual attributes of the downtown - cultural opportunities, views, historic development pattern, mix of uses, proximity to the river and transportation amenities - should be used to site residential uses downtown. The proposal is well sited with respect to existing downtown amenities. Policy DT-29. Parking should be structured whenever feasible and serve more than one use. Policy DT-30. The existing supply of parking should be better managed to encourage joint use rather than parking for each individual business. Policy DT-38. All future development and improvements in downtown should emphasize non-automobile oriented travel both to and within the downtown while maintaining an adequate amount of parking for regional retail customers. Transit and parking programs should be integrated, balanced, and implemented concurrently. Residential parking is provided in a garage structure. The policies support exempting development in the downtown core from parking standards. Policy DT-40. Site and building design should be pedestrian/people oriented with provisions for transit and automobiles where appropriate. Policy DT-47. Parking lots and structures should employ and maintain landscaping and other design techniques to minimize the visual impacts of these uses. The parking garage is not visible from street frontages. Policy DT-54. Downtown development, especially residential, should be designed to take advantage of existing amenities such as the Cedar River, city parks and trails. The project is within close proximity to the boulevard of Burnett Avenue to the south, the dinner train depot and the Piazza park area. (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation. The purpose of the CD zone is to provide a mixed-use commercial center serving a regional market as well as adjacent residences. Uses include a variety of retail sales, personal and professional services, and multi-family residential dwellings. The CD zone allows multi-family residential uses as a primary permitted use at densities ranging between 25 and 100 dwelling units per net acre. The code also specifies that multi-family residential development may be located in a mixed use building of commercial and residential uses. The proposed project includes 58 multi- SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department 4dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environs l Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 12 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 family dwelling units on a 25,335 square foot site, calculating to a net density of 100 dwelling units per acre. Development Standards The subject site is located in the "Downtown Core Area." Projects within the Downtown Core Area are exempt from most development standards of the CD zone; including parking, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. Building Height - The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The average height of the proposed building at the parapets is approximately 49 feet above the ground level. The maximum building height is 59 feet, at the stair penthouse on the roof. The highest building elevation would be approximately 96 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. The plaza level (R-1) of the proposal would cantilever four feet over the alley on the western portion of the site. However, a minimum height clearance of 14 feet from finished grade would be provided as clearance in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Landscaping - There are no landscape street frontage requirements for buildings located in the Downtown Core Area. The applicant is proposing a row of trees along the west side of the building facing the alley. These trees would function to soften the appearance of the parking garage as viewed from residences backing to the subject property on the west. The applicant is also proposing shrub plantings along S. 4`h Street. Staff recommends changing the plantings to a street tree with tree grates as more appropriate for a street frontage landscape. The proposal includes a landscaped courtyard at the residential Level 1, above the parking garage. The courtyard would be for the use of the apartment residents. The courtyard would be located along the west edge of the building, fronting on the alley. The 3 residential stories would thus be setback from the west edge of the building. This would give the building a terraced appearance from the point of view of the adjacent residences. Parking - There are no parking requirements in the Downtown Core Area. The proposal includes a parking garage with 72 parking stalls to serve the 58 residential units. This equals a ratio of 1.24 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Outside of the Downtown Core Area, the Parking Code requires 1.5 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling unit and then 1 guest parking space per 4 dwelling units which would equate to a total of 102 parking spaces. The City is planning improvements to Burnett Avenue S. and parking would be reconfigured to provide head-in parking along the frontage of the subject property. This parking would front the commercial lease space on Burnett Ave. S. and serve the parking needs of the commercial component of the proposal. These parking spaces could also provide for overnight parking for the apartment residents. The project site is located in close proximity to the Renton Transit Center so it is likely that residents of the proposed project would utilize transit at a proportionately higher rate. SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& Environrr Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 13 of17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The subject site is located toward the south edge of downtown Renton and is surrounded by a variety of uses. There is a four-story brick office building abutting on the north. To the east is the wide street of Burnett Avenue S. with commercial uses. To the south is the Spirit of Washington dinner train depot and the railroad grade. Abutting the subject site on the west are single family residences. The back yards of the residences face the project site. As discussed previously, the applicant has terraced back the upper 3-stories of the building to reduce building height impacts on abutting residences and is proposing landscaping to soften the appearance of the parking garage. The proposed landscaping consists of street trees and ground cover. The applicant should revise the landscape plan to add shrubs for additional screening of the parking garage without creating hidden spaces posing a safety issue. Most of the residences use the common alley to access garage or rear yard parking. Residents have expressed concern about impacts on the alley access with the proposed garage entry. The alley is presently 16 feet wide. Adjacent residents would encounter only minor delays in entering/exiting the alley. The applicant has located the garage entry as far as possible toward the south end of the building to limit the travel distance down the alley. The Fire Department has requested that the alley on the west side of the structure be a minimum of 20 feet wide. The applicant has agreed to revise the alley width for the entire length of the site. In order to provide the 20-foot wide alley, the applicant would convey a four-foot wide special access easement (approximately 880 square feet) to the City. The plaza level (R-1) would cantilever over the alley easement, provided that there is a minimum of 14 feet of vertical clearance for fire truck access below. Staff will recommend as a condition of Site Plan Approval, that the applicant revise the site plan to provide a minimum 20-foot wide alley from South 4th Street and along the entire west side of the proposed structure. In addition, a minimum of 14 feet of vertical clearance will be required in the alley as clearance for fire trucks. The size, bulk and height of the proposed building would be greater than most existing buildings in the vicinity of the site. However, the applicant is proposing building articulation and architectural details to create interest and reduce the overall mass of the structure. The proposal is consistent with the CD zone provisions and the zoning anticipates a departure from the existing conditions and land use patterns in downtown and in the CD zone toward a more intensive use of properties. The potential conflicts between different uses and scale of uses were evaluated with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for downtown. A residential population in downtown is encouraged to provide a customer base to complement existing and future commercial development. Construction activities on the site would result in some noise, dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, which is estimated to have a total duration of approximately 12 months (October 1999 to October 2000). The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. Building foundations would consist of augercast concrete piers to extend through the loose fill and alluvial soils underlying the site. The geotechnical report recommends this type of deep foundation construction to minimize the impact of ground vibrations during SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 14 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 the earthwork and foundation construction on conventionally-supported buildings in the vicinity. The geotechnical report states that the augercast pier installation should result in no perceptible vibrations. (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The subject site is presently paved with asphalt and there are no significant natural or human-made features on the site that would be impacted by the proposed development. The proposal would construct a building covering approximately 94% of the site area, replacing the existing impervious surfaces with building. The proposal would upgrade utilities and stormwater facilities thereby mitigating impacts associated with development of the site. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES., The proposed mix-use development is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site. Adding residential population to downtown would improve the customer base for commercial businesses and this is also expected to increase property values. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; The subject site is bordered on the east by Burnett Avenue S. and on the south by S. 4th Street. The proposal does not include a road access interior to the site. A 72-space parking garage for apartment residents is proposed with a driveway access off South 4th Street. The parking garage entrance is located at the southwest end of the building, approximately 60 feet up the alley from South 4th Street. Residents whom utilize the alley for access to their parking garages and parking spaces have expressed concern about the additional project traffic that would use the alley to access the parking garage. Plan Review staff has evaluated the alley width and determined that it meets City standards for alley and driveway width. Adjacent residents would encounter only minor delays in entering/exiting the alley. The City is planning improvements to Burnett Avenue S. and parking would be reconfigured to provide head-in parking spaces along the frontage of the subject property. This parking would serve the access and parking needs of the commercial component of the proposal. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; There is adequate space between the proposed building and surrounding structures to allow for light and air exposure to reach the building. The applicant has terraced back the upper 3-stories of the building to reduce impacts of the building height on abutting residences. This would reduce shading impacts on the adjacent residences. SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department 4dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environrr I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 15 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a residential population. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND There are adequate and available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed development. A discussion of existing utilities and planned improvements is provided in the advisory notes section of this report. The applicant will be assessed fire, traffic and park mitigation fees to compensate for the increased demand on public services. (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would redevelop and improve a site presently used as a parking lot. The investment in the area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the Fourth and Burnett Apartments. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 14. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Downtown (CD). SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environm 'Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 16 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Center Downtown (CD) Zoning designation. The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area, which specifically exempts development from on-site parking requirements, and lot coverage, setback, and landscape requirements of the CD zone. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Four-story office building; East: Burnett Avenue S., Commercial; South: Spirit of Washington Dinner Train Depot, railroad grade; and West: Single-family residential. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Downtown (CD) and the Zoning designation of Center Downtown (CD). 3) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues are addressed in the body of this report. F. Decision The Site Plan for the Fourth and Burnett Apartments, File No. LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following condition. 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan: 1) to provide street trees with tree grates along South 4th Street, 2) to add shrubs for additional screening of the parking garage, without creating hidden spaces posing a safety issue. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a minimum 20-foot wide alley from South 4th Street to and along the entire west side of the proposed structure. A minimum 14 foot vertical clearance will be required in the alley as clearance for fire trucks. The revisions are subject to the approval of the Development Services Division project manager and must be accomplished prior to the issuance of the building permit. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: 7/ 7 qr Jf Jana/fia son, Zoning Administrator date SITERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department ,administrative Site Plan Approval&Environm 'Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 17 of 17 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of July, 1999 to the applicant and owner: Charlie Laboda Daily Homes Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Ave. E. Seattle, WA. 98104 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of July, 1999 to the following parties of record: Resident Resident Resident 312 Smithers Avenue South 316 Smithers Avenue South 330 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. Renton, WA. Resident Resident Ms. Jeanette Schultz 336 Smithers Avenue South 315 Smithers Avenue South 317 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. 98055 Resident Resident Resident 321 Smithers Avenue South 331 Smithers Avenue South 340 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. 98055 Resident Resident Resident 320 Smithers Avenue South 329 Smithers Avenue South 396 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. 98055 Resident Resident 311 Smithers Avenue South 341 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. 98055 TRANSMITTED this 21st day of July, 1999 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official C. Duffy, Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Public Works Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. SITERC • 02l3WWO0- r S11N(1 • . . . L_- l 1 •... 0 .x. , I . ,..___ , , H ,i I ___ . _., .. , „L . . I 1.1 11 lii 1, 0.1 -p It II • 11 k lk-1 `1�1. ff:,r6,i II 1� [s:. J1IfIf o1EIi110 = lip 41. 1 m �( I it c = 410 �t I. I z /-J-�N 4)� • II w_-11 II li l' I 011 .`riij �.__41 • . k6 . .. I. Ill • m v Z 14iaON .I M-av-Pwq 2-0<-!BBB 13:56 r DATE BY DESCRIPTION p THOMNHS Kcbr .N MirBURNETT MIXED USE oh �T), 13400 No,thuv Way.Suile 30 s in. •y Bellevue.Washington 98005 SEATTLE, WA. --S.. (425)401-6828 ••Fax(425)40-0630 4 .• 14 .....„, 11 [...._ • __ 111 ..,,j���\\ v,,, ,� , =�= Ion Ail \ air (��lnXnKnlfn l,n(onjD DX❑ DX❑ EJ n nV1 :•°,.6-x._i.L. ,,,i-iy.4),.„„),<-6,,,x.�'. X, /„0._ ,,, I y -• , nXnXr�,(n�7i `� — "� - k� r`�- �(M40.sw4. ' s f� 6 ,( �) o 9111111111 ,mv: j I I , r ti •O r 1'a - 01 P 11 ..��� 3 ■ l titi • /� II_114'r >1 / Al nil. - I , �'_ . , vr,�ii,tr� w 3 .,,, ..,, , .„,/,...,; lniE -� 7ti • ___ u, Z Allikk , _ A. ,, ,.2_,(_ ._ •�.....4„., I' f w IX LLI I�Qf I� DX DID P ,� r, F1B? %/ l 16 1 )---,-44''`-<- - A ■, X V _ _ �- r - IS ■ •w��..m.i �-'1G'�.'� 10 �t'^ �� �fD_� 1 • =9i �1 D)��� 1 \%1��, �, IF 111, I/41A C l n I� • F— COURT YARD AND BALCONY LANDSCAPE PLAN a •+ M CZL� {�+��} J 5cbntHk None w W' �+j. 51ze Comments 51= Trees: 3 IMOt 4 f.' Aiol.a L.Gnolb Alba ... .. �� :aba macnaMl,o tednolb Alba Azal.oMN 6rovndcover: rlac.ar,nw Arnl.a Is•-la•ht.MIMI Ry4e,H I lam �., -- icv P Kb ForMt For..t Plom.Pbrb ©111 "1 w •n ..wry T, MEM 4 0 Erke tY+.re ��'_, ro:+,,,,, - tllb/r....:a ° I �Matlw-3PE �ES A9 NOTED 'L` T�'•�L�� `/d^u^-•M*arvn• °oioiovd Q� (0`<` b'�: Gear-ls•.s�.���� 11 None,,, e. _..-.... °' I 0 I__ �w�1rn-sPEUEs As NOTED Gs�yar arr r� mn..tke Ito a+o-r Nc tea a.a r ww.n av t o. ©WM= � m LaJ N.w.--sFECIESA$ ��■ t..auw. c.c°re.alcalnm �— SCALE 1/4" = l'_p" _ �I 1111 a. l- c.YN.I A. 1=:�:=%if37 7�P KaFnb btMolla'o lwti n.a --W�t!♦ � 'i .. _ NOTID �e :1 Z° 's.o-I.r'Sofa N.eth.r It- ,,, 1 ( - �• a s :. 0 DY*w•.b..Inoll° �rt•ifi� W kNh O.II NMnrr .-. E jN CfMTIITtIMINEarml am .,, _... Lnt_., P7._ ,b `�� (,) IOb.4.. en. t.nq _ _ Inmomma o Eil Perennials: - -- - - .. ma °" n"'ee•W—: _ F- ® ■Perennials: ■— irli Iaae°o.ritren Zlaab.M• t'� 43 x © + -_ rerWb D.bh/.e,-ALL GOLOIVf�� ...• I oat.. la•os. Wes' — _ gal cant ... OX v ` L 1 it a —�-- . 2 PYy.mgo m,ga Mug,F.r Ei 2-' �� Sa gOl,r,o • \ . / \ . / KW UPAl N■ET,,1RJ .� Li. NW IMP MR f AY WO OUR^ :: ,A MOM OlafID ES\6 ll®®0 199 •• / i,r1 Li' [-,km.21_ 1 .. al 10 s ma amaze t .1 esLco. m uun Mill _u u Tms unil we ® gm •u NMI ■■ , 1i11 :1i iii■ 1111 1111 ■ii■ 1999 I I I I I I 11111 .n ■ " _ 4 „ uu Ulf , o W ® � Li •. ® •• ® _ 01.10. CS L OarP ,n I ` I I I , L fMBCUL WE Q r-J C c m SOUTH ELEVATION H H. /-PAWED PETAL MOS. L- W.IMiM� • - - / _ T. MINI I__ __' MINI MINI I_,_ __' MINI MINI '_i_' _I_' MINI MINI I_,_I m o ii Er Ll. ■■_1 1_•._�-_•'_I 1_■■_�__•■ 1■■ ■'. I us_ .._ 1. :: _ _ MINI MINI _ —.■____1 I■/ E i MEP ii-----r�� ° mi ■■ ■■ E. -..-■'.I �■ n ■■ j ■■ ■ nn __ MINI MINI _ -. -.-. ------ -- ■iii _ ■i■ ■i■ ■i■ iiii MINI NIi _ NM •■iIN■ MINI MINI ■i■ _■ I MI MIMI MINI MN iii . 5: � �,,� ■ ® ■m ■u ■n u■ nn MINI_ MINI■ _ _ ■u MINI__ __ ■u _■ _i _ MINI MINI M; iiz Aar,.■. ■ ITI_ i I„ T :: n■ n II 1iiii-- _---o■■_f\.If- M IMM__. ! ------ ui _• - -MO _ .-nm _.. _ g'I; .111 W i --ij 7 w---1Plir.V.--R :, v-f .._..keno,. 0 E' _.__ � R.r [ m/IO/9 4W*DO ■-,a w.an L I Ja -- ELEVATIONS SOUTH a EA, • EAST ELEVATION A Q ■w.,. Liu 99008 Sri Li! SO 10 1. MIME OD DO �� WW�WWW� WWW�IWWW� O ODOO� II .. . . D •. NE EN .• lif19 Fla rim :::: 1 �r� m .:: �::: �F� ::: rr� n� r ::: :II:: m m®m® _It Iii U El El ok, trim Ff, nu aid .. ...,,.., .. ,0 0 , 0i it 711Znow mama iti uu F99 ftlifiiPi Ei it it uu all c ZI r"°aL 49 .iN6100W-_ o .. 40, VI N t ,u«naw p00.1L00aws..Ai ill d-======1 (1.1 4 w-+a COCPIR_ wWANW[11M1 udr+pwu wH RA11 - - �__�.�_ �J d_*a move: 6 (r WEST ELEVATION 2 Cwl Mn0 H F. U WC CORK CO bJrCONt Wutp. Z N o o o�J,LW ___-I 5 0 im_ `Rpy s s 00 t- KLIMO P.i.Wwttw ELEVATORS bt•iDtaiaEiE 1-_- _.- _-__ __ - ----- ----- NORTH t WEST NORTH ELEVATION A9 99008 �• .x CITY OF RENTON crx ma/ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 22, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on July 20, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED FOURTH & BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five"live-work"commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work"residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five"live-work"commercial spaces are oriented to South 4th Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4th Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. Location: 339 Burnett Ave. South. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, (236- Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agncyltr\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton. Washington 98055 �• r... CITY OF RENTON a Ir Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 22, 1999 Mr. Charlie Laboda Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East Seattle,WA 98104 SUBJECT: Fourth and Burnett Apartments Project No. LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Laboda: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on July 21, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 430-6510. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Parties of Record Enclosure dnsmltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Fourth and Burnett Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individcial spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles iq provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4` Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 339 Burnett Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated May 5, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi- family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Fourth and Burnett Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4th Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4 Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 339 Burnett Avenue South Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Use the current UBC Code: 1997. Field monitoring per soils report required. Windows for light, ventilation, egress to open on yard or courtyard. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 6,000 GPM. Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and the secondary hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building, 2. An approved fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire Department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building. Proposal as shown does provide this required access on the west side of the building. Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide. Alley shall be widened to 20-feet wide within 150 feet of the northwest corner of the building. 5. Fire Department recommends a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit and 1 guest space for every two dwelling units. These spaces should be in addition to the parking required to support the retail/commercial activities, which are proposed for the ground floor. Note: The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area and is therefore exempt from all parking requirements. PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There are existing 12-inch, 6-inch, 4-inch and 8-inch diameter water lines surrounding this property. The project is served by the 196 pressure zone. The proposed project is not located in either APA zone. SEWER—An 8-inch diameter sewer main is located in the alley behind the proposed project. Fourth & Burnett Apartments LUA-99-090,SA-A,EC F Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 STORM -A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream public drainage facilities exist to serve the site. STREETS —All the streets are paved. Burnett Avenue is currently under design for reconfiguration at S 3rd Street. Any damaged or sub-standard frontage improvements will be required to meet city standards. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.113 per square foot of property for a fee of$2,862.86. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 2. It may be required to upgrade one or more small diameter water line in the vicinity to obtain appropriate fire flow for the proposed project depending on fire department requirements. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.078 per square foot of property for a fee of$1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface for a fee of$1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. AIRPORT The proposed project is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing the Renton Airport. The airport is open for use by aircraft 24-hours per day. Residents of the premises throughout the 24-hour period may hear the noise made by these aircraft. This should be considered during insulation and sound deadening design determinations. The proposed project is located within 10,000 feet of the runway, beneath the 179—foot elevation above sea level height restriction. The proposed project lists a 50-foot above ground level height. PARKS Recommend street trees and grates on South 4th Street rather than shrubs. Norm . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units,five'live-work'commerciat/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft.of retail commercial lease space. The building would be lour stories(59-foot maximum height)plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and live-work"residences.The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five live-work'commercial spaces are oriented to South 4x'Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels).The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4'"Street.The mein pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South,Location:339 Burnett Ave.South. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9.1999. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8.11/3.Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-435.6510. ffl -- ''t,, '°r ' I IN. i r a . I - e :h5 7 �I { i. ;sl �-� •4.1."1,4 j - .i.�a4 iI :Ofodi w r r - '' *G I Il Fitt ate. • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, g4-QC e0SeV\ , hereby certify that ' copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on N c.,( ,) - ,l ccac • Signed: j:---)1&t,\_tPlf12--.ATTEST: Subcnbed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and f rte of Washington residing in ,ol,� .„ , on the -3�'j 1h day of 14� t .: MARILYN KAMCHEFF • `"2-77 a- NOTARY PUBLIC 'i STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES MARILYN KAMCHEFF JUNE 29, 2003 • MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 ... ` •• .Fe1L-21-99 01 : 14 PM T 1AS HARKEY ARCHITECTS 42Z a10630 P. 01 4, Thomas A Harkey Architects • ,t r ;� t 13400 Northup Way, Suite 30 •- .4... '° M, ...:;,' • Bellevue, WA 98005 Date o'-r, 2i • q=.q Number of pages including cover sheet 5 : lr Up„ �t q Oq0 To: GtTti•• cr= --c.J __ S.�_..►.1 t cs�-- titer- From: • Project —1--t� 1.-1P•cc'r Name 'EN.hFzt..) -r'r M t x Thomas A Harkey Architects Project# Ct nop Phone Fax# (-423) -4 SO— 73 CO _.. ..__ _ CC: Phone (425) 401-6828 Fax# (425) 401-0630 ❑ Urgent ❑ For your review Reply ASAP Please comment ❑ Hard copy to follow Aso p%-c-k oNL_ -CgE=NPrrl IN> To 1_.-f r' . t z_ • -t-o tot Y UN OE1:=...vT-ANo I►.)G mbkssec.-1 � rtOJ `` � Imo— q M f=1�-•E L-.ANES1 I . b A -F-t L-JQtve z W i '-- H t N , Q Cc_ c • 1 a • AS t 0..3 O I CrI NI G.�R 5`► ..e.rcr+Es %MC_ QAv Lo PrzsAj i O . 4 11.oL tt I '4 -Q ' t-14m PIZs.A4=' a 3JtLt )INO, ,>aou L_O t n►-rE2a�1i�t�E t i�-1tE 20� W t 0� UNLS �N►-4 '�L6�t._c�i"-tct� fi=oss 14 .14EtAtY.I WL.n * op c.) -ri-t t t r:E t Ccu CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The material contained in this FM transmission is private and confidential and is intended only for use by the individuals on this sheet. Use,disclosure.copying.distribution or reliance upon the information contained in this FAX by anyone other than the individuals named is prohibited If you have received this FAX in error, please notify us immediately by calling(206)401-6828 and return the original transmission to us at the above address. Thank you. tL>E�. . t ►�Itsr US k�V ,3 wl+NTH 41A4ts Is' C9A1t 'L�"t�C JJ I t-Fi- ,ems J l ATiCxvS D A Cr,aP 7' Lie L9RJ GESitNE(. . Kthfax dot 1—V M J,UL-21-99 01 : 14 PM T 1AS HARKEY ARCHITECTS 42.. 310630 P. 02 4-14 2 4-14-3 parking shall be a permanent parking Arrange- STORAGE LOT: A specially designed area for ment. The permanency of the parking shall be parking or holding of operable motor vehicles or determined upon consideration of the remaining wheeled equipment for more than seventy two(72) economic life of the building for which the parking hours. (See bulk storage regulations for lots cx- is provided, and of the provision of the applicant seeding 1 acre in area.) of appropriate measures to protect against condi- tions which may cause forfeiture of the lease or TANDEM PARKING: The parking of one motor other land use agreement. Such measures may vehicle behind another, where one does not have include, but are not limited to, bonds or covenants direct access to a parking aisle without the mov- running with the land upon which the building is ing of the other vehicle. Tandem parking is al- located to cause the termination of the occupancy lowed only in single•family and duplex residential of the building upon termination of the leased zones. parking. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN LOADING AREA: A specially designed off-street (TMY): A plan developed by the occupant of a place intended to be used by vehicles fur deposit- building or land use, or by the developer of a pro- ing and/or receiving passengers and goods. posed project, designed to provide mechanisms for reducing the vehicle demand generated by an OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES AREAS: Specialty existing or proposed land use. designed areas for the retail sale of automobiles, small trucks, vans or other similar type motor UNCOVERED COMMERCIAL AREA: An area vehicles. It does not generally include commercial- used for display purposes or for commercial trans- ly licensed motor vehicles such as buses or trucks. actions not combined within a stricture. (Ord. 4517, 5-8-95) PARKING LOT OR PARKING AREA: A specially designed off-street place intended to be used pri marily for the temporary storage of vehicles for 4-14-3: USES AM) CONDITIONS: durations of less than seventy two (72) hours. Included in this definition is the permanent sur- A. New Buildings and Building Additions: Off: face, striping, landscaping and other features street parking shall be provided in accor- required by this Section. dance with the provisions of this Section in the following cases: PARKING SPACE OR PARKING STALL: A park- ing spare is any off-street space intended for the 1. The construction of new buildings or struc- use of vehicular parking with ingress and egress tures; to the space easily identifiable. 4 ^..._.�.�. 2. The enlargement or remodeling of an ex- SHOPPING CENTER: A group of buildings, struc- isting building/structure or land use by more tures and/or uncovered commercial areas, or a than one-third (213) of the area of build- single building containing four (4) or more individ- ing/structure or area of land use; or (Ord. ual commercial establishments, planned, devel• 9988,4-28-86) oped and managed as a unit related in location and type of shops to the trade area that the unit 3. Paving of a parking lot with a permanent serves. surface, or striping a previously unstriped lot. (Ord. 4517, 5.8.95) STACKING SPACE: The spare specifically desig- nated as a waiting area for vehicles whose occu- B. Change in Use: When the occupancy of any pants will be patronizing a drive-in business. Such land use, structure and/or building or any space is considered to be located directly alongside part of a building, structure, and/or land use a drive-in window, facility or entrance used by is changed to another use requiring in- patrons and in lanes leading up to and away from creased parking stalls, parking shall be pro- the business establishment. vide(' to meet the parking requirements of 695 City of Renton JUL-21-99 01 : 15 PM 1 1AS HARKEY ARCHITECTS 42: 010630 P. 03 4-14-3 4-14-4 the new use, as specified in Section 4.14.8. (3) Driveways shall not be closer then (Ord. 3988, 4-28-86) live feet (5') to any property line (except as allowed under Section 4.14.4B1c, C. Exemption for the Downtown Core Area: The Joint Use Driveways). downtown core area which is described as fiat area bounded by the center lines of b. All Other Uses: Smithers Avenue South from South Fourth Place to South Third Avenue and Logan (1)The location of ingress and egress Avenue South from South Third Street to driveways shall be subject to approval South Second Street, bounded on the north of the Planning/Building/Public Works •by Cedar River, east to Mill Avenue South, Department under curb cut permit south to South Fourth Street and west to procedures. Smithers Avenue South shall be exempt from the ro pvisiogalf.thjp„Sectiori._'This area shall (2)Driveways shall not exceed forty also extend to the west property line of those percent(40%) of the street frontage. properties fronting along the west side of Logan Avenue South between South Second (3)There shall be a minimum of eigh- Street and Airport Way, but in no case shall teen feet (]8') between driveway curb the area extend more than one hundred ten returns where there is :sore than one feet (110') west of the Logan Avenue South driveway on property under single own- right of way. (Ord. 4466,8-22-94) erahip or control and used as one pre- -- mises. (Ord. 3988,4-28-86) 4-14-1: GENERAL PROVISIONS: (4)Driveways shall not be closer than five feet (5') to any property line(except A. Use of Public Right of Way: Maneuvering as allowed under Section 4-14-4131c, space shall be completely off the right of way Joint Use Driveways) unless a perma- of any public street except for parking spaces nent easement on the bordering proper- provided for single-family dwellings and ty creating a five foot (5') clearance is duplexes. Alleys shall not be used fur obtained. off-street parking and loading purposes, but may be used for maneuvering space. c. Joint Use Driveways: Joint use drive- ways reduce the number of curb cuts along B. Ingress/Egress: individual streets and thereby improve safety and reduce congestion while providing for 1. Driveway Location: additional on-street parking opportunities. Joint use driveways should be encouraged a. Industrial, Warehouse and Shopping when feasible and appropriate. Center Uses: (1) Adjoining uses may utilize a joint (1)The location of ingress and egress use driveway where such joint use driveways shall be subject to approval driveway reduces the total number of of the Planning/Building/Public Works driveways entering the street network, Department under curb cut permit subject to the approval of the Plan- procedures. ning/Building/Public Works Depart- ment. (2)There shall be a minimum of forty feet (40') between driveway curb re- (2) Joint use driveways must be created turns where there is more than one upon the common property line of the driveway on property under unified properties served or through the grant- ownership or control and used as one ing of a permanent access easement premises. when said driveway does not exist upon 695 City of Renton JUL-21-99 01 : 16 PM T lAS HARKEY ARCHITECTS 42 010630 P. 04 4-14-4 4-14-4 b. In case of any suit or action to enforce (2) Additional fire lanes may be re- any provisions of this subsection, the devel- quircd in order to provide access for oper shall pay unto the City all costs inciden- firefighting or rescue operations at tat to such litigation including reasonable building entrances or exits, fire hy- attornoy's fees. drants and fire protection system ser- vice connection or control devices. 6. Binding Upon Applicant: The requirement of the posting of any performance bond or h. 'Design: T.anes shall provide a minimum other security therefor shall be binding on unobstructed continuous width of twenty feet the applicant, his heirs, successors and as- Z20') andprovide a minimum vertical clear- signs. ance o t irteen eet six inches ' ). 7. Transfer of Responsibility: c. Identification: (Ord. 3988, 4-28-86) a. Once a bond has been accepted by the (1) Lanes shall be identified by a four Board of Public Works, there shall be no inch (4") wide line and curb painted release of the owner or developer for their bright red. The block letters shall state, obligations unless a new party agrees in "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING", be eieh- writing to be responsible under the bond, and teen inches (18") high, painted white, has provided a new bond. located not less than one foot (1') from the curb face, at fifty foot (50') inter- b. In the instance where a new bond would vals. (Ord. 4130, 2-15-88) be provided by a condominium owners' asso- ciation or property owners' association, then (2) Signs shall be twelve inches by eigh- it shall be necessary for the owners' associa- teen inches (12" x 18") and shall have tion to have voted to assume the obligation letters and background of contrasting before the City may accept the new bond, colors, readily readable from at least a and a copy of the minutes of the meeting of fifty foot (50') distance. (Ord. 3988, the owners' association duly certified shall be 4-28-66) filed along with the bond. (3) Signs shall be spaced not further c. The City shall not be required to permit than fifty feet (50') apart nor shall they a substitution of one party for another on be placed less than five feet (5'), or any bond if the Board of Public Works, after more than seven feet (7') from the full review, finds that the new owner does ground. The installation and use of fire not provide sufficient security to the City lane signs will preclude the require- that the improvements will be installed when ment for painting 'FIRE LANE - NO required. PARKING", in the lane only. The area shall he identified by painting the curb M. l;ire Lanes: red or in the absence of a curb, a four inch (4") red line shall be used. (Ord. 1. Standards: 4130, 2-15-88) a. Location: d. Construction: (1) As required by the Fire Codes and (1)Fire lanes shall be an all weather the Fire Department, fire lanes shall be surface constructed of asphalt or rein- installed surrounding facilities which forced concrete certified to be capable of by their size, location, design or con- supporting a twenty (20) ton vehicle, or tents warrant access which exceeds that when specifically authorized by the Fire normally provided by the proximity of Department, crushed rock may be used; City streets. provided, written certification is provid- 695 City of Renton JUL-21-99 01 : 16 PM T---1AS HARKEY ARCHITECTS 42: 010630 P. 05 4-14-4 4-14.5 ed from a soils engineer, that the road- whole for the parking spaces required, sub- way will support the weight of operat- ject to the approval of the Plan- ing fire apparatus. ning/Building/Public Works Department. (2) Where fire lanes connect to City 2. The developer may seek the assistance of streets or parking lots, adequate clear- the Planning/Building/Public Works Depart- ances and turning radii shall be provid- meat in formulating a transportation man- ed. agement plan. The plan must be agreed upon by both the: City and the developer through a 2. Driveways and/or Parking Areas: The Fire binding contract, with the City. At a mini- Department may require that areas specified mum, the transportation management plan for use as driveways or private thoroughfares will designate the number of trips to be re- shall be designated as fire lanes and be duced on a daily basis, the means by which marked or identified as required by this the plan is to be accomplished, an evaluation Section. procedure, and a contingency plan if the trip r-- reduction goal cannot be met. If the trans- 3. Existing Buildings. portation management plan is unsuccessful, the developer is obligated to immediately a. Hazard: When the Fire Chief, or his provide additional measures at the direction authorized designee, determines that a bra- of the Planning/Building/Public Works De- ard due to inaccessibility of fire apparatus partment, which may include the require- exists around existing buildings, he may merit to provide full parking as required by require fire lanes to be constructed and City standards. (Ord. 4517, 5-8-95) maintained as provided by this Section. b. Exception: When the required clearances 4-14-5: LOADING SPACE: outlined in .ubsection M1 cannot be physi- cally provided, modification may be allowed A. For all buildings hereafter erected, recon- upon written application and approval of the struct.ed or enlarged, adequate permanent Fire Chief. (Ord. 398R, 4-28.86) off-street loading space shall be provided if the activity carried on in such building re- N. Linkages: The Planning/13uilding/Public quires deliveries to it or shipments from it of Works Department shall have the authority people or merchandise. to establish, or cause to be established, bicy- cle, high occupancy vehicle and pedestrian B. Such space shall be shown on a plan and linkages within public and private develop- submitted for approval by the Plan- ments. Enforcement shall be administered ning/13uildingiPublic Works Department. through the normal site design review and/or permitting process. Adjustments to the stan- C. No portion of a vehicle taking part in loading dard parking requirements (4-14-8) may be or unloading activities shall project into a made by the Planning/Building/Public Works public street or alley. Department based on the extent of these services to be provided, D. Loading space shall be in addition to re- quired off-street parking spaces. O. Transportation Management Plans: E. Buildings which utilize dock-high loading 1. Transportation management plan (TMP) doors shall provide a minimum one hundred guaranteeing the required reduction in vehi- feet (100') of clear maneuvering area in front cle trips may be substituted in part or in of each door. (See following diagram.) 695 City of Renton • • JJL-20-99 04 :49 PM T IAS HARKEY ARCHITECTS 42` 310630 P- 01 Thomas .Harkey Architects 13400 Northup Way, Suite 30 Bellevue,WA 98005 Date _o . Number of pages including cover sheet 2 - _ L— U A. c c _,`tQ To: C.tT^c T CiV LL.-E't' ACC. iS c\ssit_-- From: • Project T' 13r3�-� tQ,e.-a`,• Name 12.y}��t� '_ tx .p_Q2E. Thomas A Harkey Architects Project# `1 ;k0iD Phone Fax# �2.5) q CC: Phone (425) 401-6828 Fax# (425) 401-0630 ❑ Urgent For your review 0 Reply ASAP ❑ Please comment ❑ Hard copy to follow ¶4-G t.1 V 2SAT1 C1\3 714 tS' P.-F C c'u ks A Qv t crc. S r_1-CM t N cz, 1 c-A-r i tv G r=:›tr.4.kc.$.0-r,z;)-1-1Na \ 'rH� -F.A\ zE. �i Ct-=- Ttz)J GCS 'cor-t S - .+ ST t_O QJ c -r f rV 6 -taINI P DING City-) Ue fie_ Q7S 03.4 CWSj 2- ce 4 F'-E E A-c-C,E S S el=-P%rtd- 15J t�� L►t-t Pew r 1•4 t— Q I C�lJE, Q�Q 6V CE .-r N t ?fit c+J L I N \j . H t rJ I r-t -TLC -N Crt}E 2W 1 It Cc rt 'A`rIrlc cN f --K1j1 gtCt'J CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The material contained in this FAX transmission is private and confidential and is intended only for use by the individuals on this sheet. Use,disclosure,copying.distribution or reliance upon the information contained in this FAX by anyone other than the individuals named is prohibited If you have received this FAX in error, please notify us immediately by calling(200)401-6828 and return the original transmission to us at the above address. Thank you. Kthfax dot _ �. • JUL-20-99 04 :50 PM T IAS HARKEY ARCHITECTS 42 010630 P. 02 i //lir .... kd t.. __ Q F-.D. P,cC I�cL_� A ����Y S`tr1VN- F V i ..0. A CC_E-51 Ac-1.--1-- ic )1 )\,. • • P.SErt C-J r Esc-11-• t . V.)`\• k f 1' t '/., . - - i i/ri-ae/.er l= lr p i t • I F) VT 1 , i V 'Q 2, ., ,,,,, • •ice-.1"i .r ler'—. _ . 'dr° oP' 4.J 'rb S eY ; II UVN.) t-1--- i 1 r 7-/-rss A c.:-; FT\ -9� r»> ice. —A— Gem -rC:• 4 i 1 , w1CS- (>2. ‘131oE) _+t 2 , : 1.-VJ s1L. 1 • Fist, 1(j� c.. ALI F)T. BSI Z r / 0N1 1 Qel Q 1 N 85 1-F7 Ls G 37( to{ — tD 0 Y , • i 1-W Carl rN t`. .. Gt 3J10 1 L_t N I • 1� F LOCATE C cLUr1kA 2d p.D. AcC.F�S (2; F?- LAC -i . Prr1 P Cs) s cki1L: le' c ' 2 wtc l ll I w ,c,� E.,-t s r,r T . .SJ .-C-i- (�) �/8 = t-L Ac ; • JUL-20-99 04 :50 PM 1 1AS HARKEY ARCHITECTS 42 010630 P. 03 5 . 44 ,k IOW _lt___ ...1 � 1t r)li 6) ..q 0 1. Ile, 1 1) 1:1 i if, -U6 4 ��� �!+ .. .1 1 i) . . . . ..A/ ill 12 i _ _ ._ 1 0 1 z co i) 6 0 V 0 inNLi . 1 , r w o rt ,:l • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Fourth and Burnett Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live- work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be diviked into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4` Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4th Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 339 Burnett Avenue South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: July 26, 1999 DATE OF DECISION: August 09, 1999 SIGNATURES: //ffp /ffiA/V.00 7 0/71 reg Zlm�'Y� rr an, Adm. strator DA'f De artmentlof Ian uilding/Public Works ? e_.)(7 Jim Shepherd, ministrator DA E Community Syes 7- (3.' ? Lee e er, ire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig . 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Fourth and Burnett Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individal spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles i provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4` Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 339 Burnett Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated May 5, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi- family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes PROJECT NAME: Fourth and Burnett Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4th Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4 Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 339 Burnett Avenue South Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Use the current UBC Code: 1997. Field monitoring per soils report required. Windows for light, ventilation, egress to open on yard or courtyard. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 6,000 GPM. Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and the secondary hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building, 2. An approved fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire Department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building. Proposal as shown does provide this required access on the west side of the building. Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide. Alley shall be widened to 20-feet wide within 150 feet of the northwest corner of the building. 5. Fire Department recommends a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit and 1 guest space for every two dwelling units. These spaces should be in addition to the parking required to support the retail/commercial activities, which are proposed for the ground floor. Note: The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area and is therefore exempt from all parking requirements. PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There are existing 12-inch, 6-inch, 4-inch and 8-inch diameter water lines surrounding this property. The project is served by the 196 pressure zone. The proposed project is not located in either APA zone. SEWER—An 8-inch diameter sewer main is located in the alley behind the proposed project. Fourth & Burnett Apartments LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 STORM -A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream public drainage facilities exist to serve the site. STREETS —All the streets are paved. Burnett Avenue is currently under design for reconfiguration at S 3rd Street. Any damaged or sub-standard frontage improvements will be required to meet city standards. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.113 per square foot of property for a fee of$2,862.86. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 2. It may be required to upgrade one or more small diameter water line in the vicinity to obtain appropriate fire flow for the proposed project depending on fire department requirements. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.078 per square foot of property for a fee of$1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface for a fee of$1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. PLAN REVIEW -GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. AIRPORT The proposed project is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing the Renton Airport. The airport is open for use by aircraft 24-hours per day. Residents of the premises throughout the 24-hour period may hear the noise made by these aircraft. This should be considered during insulation and sound deadening design determinations. The proposed project is located within 10,000 feet of the runway, beneath the 179—foot elevation above sea level height restriction. The proposed project lists a 50-foot above ground level height. PARKS Recommend street trees and grates on South 4th Street rather than shrubs. a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has a of newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months (ERC) sissued Mitigated Determinationr the fol- lowing to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language Non-Significance project ed- the authoritydforf the continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Renton Municipal code.TT APARTMENTS Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the FOURT AND-090,SA-A,ECF UR State of Washington for King County. Environmental review for a mixed use � The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County structure consisting of apartments, com- a mercial/residential units and retail Joumal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers com- mercial lease space. Location: 339 during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a 'Burnett Ave.So. Appeals of the environmental determina- tion must be filed in writing on or before Fourth & Burnett Apartments 5:00 PM August 9, 1999.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing as published on: 7/26/99 Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.appeals to The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publi ' n js the sum of$40.25, the Examiner are governed by City of Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Charged to Acct. No. 805106 Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. Legal Number 6395 Publication Date: July 26,1999 Published in the South County Journal July 26,1999.6395 Legal Cle , South Coun y Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this 36 day of , 1A 1 , 19 °`�000vi t s 2 C l i r tiie�o� (,� boi,...„ ri..\._`----VIL.f_ ° ''• • . ('/,or `. �� F'Ste- u.L,F/'_/e';,�� Notary Public of the State of Washington o A.:-J t,. � STAR v>.. i residing in Renton t ►` 0,= King County, Washington ip._ 17- �'0.-FCPLDL,COO'Off'. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF Environmental review for a mixed use structure consisting of apartments, commercial/residential units and retail commercial lease space. Location: 339 Burnett Ave. So. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 1999. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: July 26, 1999 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot City of Renton . r REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: July 13, 1999 Project Name: Fourth and Burnett Apartments Applicant: Daily Homes Owner: City of Renton File Number: LUA-099-090, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4!h Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4th Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. Project Location: 339 Burnett Avenue S. Exist. Bldg. Area: NA Proposed New Bldg. Area: 87,103 sq. ft. Site Area: 25,300 sq. ft. Total Building Area: NA wa4, u+• i, IE ate:_4.,. _ �m l 1. ,. r: 4E It*H ,:IL" - 5, ,Q i rip tusi ' aa ! f rs .,,� , as _or fara WRY. x ?. Zr?� , Ji_ _ uta� a�e� a.- .,1 NE. we ,re3 ••,,-er. - :kV! la-auir�a arr as-ae j swiz n= QNM.l rer a iiQf a mil =I� awry xsq 4 •/. illiG 1 G I . Miles rza 'EINme=,a!di�i�•'*4 tti i .. .F, •� awe a�linri I a!aica,Mil= ac ' ga Imo . '®�i , !�Q i� ammo ai II 3 dti[a NTLik . ( T I T t •um G DrDlla InTr sox as li a" - !rs �l� ow- a a� i , �• aulm �l .sss� asac� L_ • ".. aw mil 'Lima ar1's=n ar;`- '�'" � D1sy" +�i�i�t ray Lrm ae.Ili In ra I a:r f 9i�" E: MU ors Ili sn rt�+o�=a� aCal -�,}. • doss a•� ra I a i 1 lv zc 9 Drell,r, , 'Am?* a■Iw swig sr, Fcare sa':» 717. asp . rJr' k��• m99►°.G3 W 051® s i � ink! 1Er N ! r.. lA - a�, raw, G I h�har.�� ay.�o.� am:�aED a=a� ►*��Adr�zmizzi aeJGsimmis •• E a ��. mic- Pp4 — l imm anri astrse mmo ] M' .d —• m n �lirdI 1 arrda yam •u ;„."� Aims ��I iEz1 wa .men- n7G7 ' _ G'•GJ[.LB .sue!ice wn n• el cra m= •ram: , era c� mar r �afdLL aj .. as Er Imo EYd`Eh ®�= a�r� `.. ..,.llr • aasl�vs• ���aar�`a ac>>rt, ;�� afd� 1t' iS ara 7Ur! ma ram. Si(a�L. and rip ,Ted=- ma/Jr__b__ K. e y i v Project Location Map '' .s a� ' f,. MITA .i`. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environm f Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 2 of 18 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five "live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (59-foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and "live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4th Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4th Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A landscaped courtyard for apartment residents is proposed over the upper garage on the west side of the building open to the alley. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is basically flat and completely paved with asphalt. The pavement slopes westerly approximately 2% to 4% towards the alley. The lower level of the parking garage would require excavating approximately 3 feet below the existing grade. The applicant has not provided an estimate of the quantity of fill material or grading anticipated with the proposal. A geotechnical report for the proposal has been prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. Based on soil boring tests, the consultant concluded that the loose fill and alluvial deposits that underlie the site would not be suitable for supporting the proposed structure because of the potential for excessive post-construction settlement. The report recommends deep foundations consisting of augercast concrete piers as the most appropriate type of foundation support considering the size of the planned building, the presence of nearby structures, and the soil and groundwater conditions that underlie the site. The piers would extend through the fill and loose soils into the underlying dense sands and gravels. Due to the presence of conventionally-supported buildings in the vicinity, it would be important to minimize ground vibrations during the earthwork and foundation SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval&Environm I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 3 of 18 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 construction. The geotechnical report states that the augercast pier installation should result in no perceptible vibrations. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to follow the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and Construction Mitigation Plan, approved prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated May 5, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance. 2. Water Impacts: As the site is currently paved, no net increase in runoff is anticipated. Runoff from the proposed structure would be collected and conveyed underground to the existing storm sewer conveyance system. The volume of runoff would not increase from existing conditions. Water quality may improve since the existing asphalt pavement used by vehicles would be replaced by rooftop. The covered parking garage would have floor drains connected directly to the sanitary sewer system. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 3. Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would add new construction to the City and would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction at a rate of $388 per multi-family unit, and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee for the 58 multi-family units is estimated to be $22,504 (58 units X $388 = $22,504). Fire mitigation fees for the commercial portion of the building is estimated to be $3,479.84 (6,692 sq. ft. X $0.52 = $3,479.84). The total Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $25,983.84. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. Fire Department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building. Access roads are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide. To ensure adequate fire equipment access, the alley on the west side of the building will be required to be widened to 20-feet within 150 feet of the northwest corner of the building. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi-family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance, Environmental Review (SEPA) SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval&Environrr I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 4 of 18 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 4. Transportation Impacts: A 72-space parking garage for apartment residents is proposed on two levels (basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4th Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. The parking garage entrance is located at the southwest end of the building, approximately 60 feet up the alley from South 4th Street. There are several residences to the west of the subject property that use the common alley for access to their garages and parking. Residents have expressed concern that vehicles entering and exiting the parking garage via the alley would impact their access from the alley. It is estimated that proposed apartments would generate approximately 268 average daily trips. The alley is presently 16-feet wide and a minimum of the first 65 feet from the alley would be expanded to a 20-foot width to better accommodate fire equipment access. The alley meets City street standards for driveway width in multi-family developments. Plan Review staff has determined the width is sufficient for vehicle access and turning movements for the existing residents and the added traffic that would result under the proposal. The proposed multi-family and commercial development would result in an increase in the number of traffic trips on the local street system. However, the amount of additional traffic that would be generated is not anticipated to result in a significant impact on the street system. A Traffic Mitigation Fee will be assessed based on the number of average daily trips that are attributed to the proposed development. The number of trips is based on standards from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. It is estimated that the residential and commercial components of the proposal would result in a total net increase of 307.8 average daily trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per average daily trip. The traffic mitigation fee is thus estimated to be $23,085. The proposal includes a parking garage with 72 parking stalls to serve the 58 residential apartment units. The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area which specifically exempts development projects from on-site parking code requirements. The proposal would provide parking at a ratio of 1.24 spaces per dwelling unit. The Parking Code requires 1.5 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling unit and then 1 guest parking space per 4 dwelling units, which if applied to the proposal would equal a total of 102 spaces. The project site is located in close proximity to the Renton Transit Center so it is likely that residents of the proposed project would utilize transit at a proportionately higher rate. The City is planning improvements to Burnett Avenue S. and parking would be reconfigured to provide head-in parking along the frontage of the subject property. This parking would front the commercial lease space on Burnett Ave. S. and serve the parking needs of the commercial component of the proposal. These parking spaces could also provide for overnight parking for the apartment residents. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan stating that construction hours would be limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic. Construction activity within 300 feet of residential areas is limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Idministrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 5 of 18 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 5. Parks and Recreation Impacts: The proposal would result in construction of 58 multi-family residential units. Future residents would make use of existing and future City park and recreation facilities throughout the City. In order to mitigate the impact of the development on the City's parks and recreation facilities the City has adopted a mitigation fee of $354.51 per new multi-family dwelling unit. The Park's Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $20,561.58. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 6. Environmental Health/Noise Impacts: Development of the site would result in noise impacts. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, estimated to be have a total duration of approximately 12 months (October 1999 to October 2000). Construction activity within 300 feet of residential areas is limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which includes measures to minimize construction impacts. Construction equipment noise would be mitigated by muffling equipment as required per standard construction standards and dust would be controlled using best management construction practices. The noise impacts are not considered significant due to the limited duration of the construction period and mitigations restricting the hours of construction and minimizing equipment noise. Construction of building foundations would consist of augercast concrete piers to extend through the loose fill and alluvial soils underlying the site. The geotechnical report recommends this type of deep foundation construction to minimize the impact of ground vibrations during the earthwork and foundation construction on conventionally-supported buildings in the vicinity. The geotechnical report states that the augercast pier installation should result in no perceptible vibrations. Future residents of the proposed project would be subjected to noise and activity normal to an urban center. The project site is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing Renton Airport. Aircraft fly at low altitudes over or in the near vicinity of the site. Noise from aircraft could impact future residents of the apartment proposal. The applicant should consider this impact and incorporate insulation and sound-deadening design materials. After completion of the project, there would be noise impacts of increased traffic and impacts from activities normally associated with an introduced residential population. The Comprehensive Plan and zoning envisions downtown Renton as an urban center with a variety of residential and commercial uses developed at a high-density, intensity level. The potential conflicts between uses and impacts of airport and transit noise were SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A,ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 6 of 18 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 known factors with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for downtown. The potential noise impacts on residents are not considered of a significant magnitude to warrant imposition of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 7. Land Use and Aesthetics Impacts: The subject site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) Comprehensive Plan map and Zoning designation. The proposal includes multi-family residential and commercial uses which are consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the uses permitted in the CD zoning designation. Potential impacts of residential uses in the downtown were evaluated during the process of adopting the Comprehensive Plan and implementing zoning. It is anticipated that the proposed residential and commercial uses would be compatible with existing, surrounding land uses and the future land use types envisioned under the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The average height of the proposed building at the parapets is approximately 49 feet above the ground level. The maximum building height is 59 feet, at the stair penthouse on the roof. The highest building elevation would be approximately 96 feet above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department 4dministrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 • Page 7 of 18 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Issue DNS-M with 15 day Period. Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated May 5, 1999, prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., regarding general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi- family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip attributed to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of $354.51 per multi- family dwelling unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn I Review Committee Staff Report 'FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 8 of 18 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. BUILDING Use the current UBC Code: 1997. Field monitoring per soils report required. Windows for light, ventilation, egress to open on yard or courtyard. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 6,000 GPM. Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and the secondary hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building, 2. An approved fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 3. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. Fire Department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building. Proposal as shown does provide this required access on the west side of the building. Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide. Alley shall be widened to 20-feet wide within 150 feet of the northwest corner of the building. 5. Fire Department recommends a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit and 1 guest space for every two dwelling units. These spaces should be in addition to the parking required to support the retail/commercial activities, which are proposed for the ground floor. Note: The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area and is therefore exempt from all parking requirements. PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER -There are existing 12-inch, 6-inch, 4-inch and 8-inch diameter water lines surrounding this property. The project is served by the 196 pressure zone. The proposed project is not located in either APA zone. SEWER—An 8-inch diameter sewer main is located in the alley behind the proposed project. STORM - A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream public drainage facilities exist to serve the site. STREETS — All the streets are paved. Burnett Avenue is currently under design for reconfiguration at S 3`d Street. Any damaged or sub-standard frontage improvements will be required to meet city standards. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.113 per square foot of property for a fee of$2,862.86. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 2. It may be required to upgrade one or more small diameter water line in the vicinity to obtain appropriate fire flow for the proposed project depending on fire department requirements. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.078 per square foot of property for a fee of$1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface for a fee of$1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. SITERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department administrative Site Plan Approval&Environn l Review Committee Staff Report 'FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 13, 1999 Page 9 of 18 REVISED JULY 20, 1999 PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. AIRPORT The proposed project is located beneath a heavily traveled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing the Renton Airport. The airport is open for use by aircraft 24-hours per day. Residents of the premises throughout the 24-hour period may hear the noise made by these aircraft. This should be considered during insulation and sound deadening design determinations. The proposed project is located within 10,000 feet of the runway, beneath the 179—foot elevation above sea level height restriction. The proposed project lists a 50-foot above ground level height. PARKS Recommend street trees and grates on South 4th Street rather than shrubs. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 1999 (14 days from the date of publication). Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. SITERC.doc • CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: July 15, 1999 TO: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Fourth and Burnett Apartments — LUA99-090, SA-A, ECF ERC members requested additional information on issues raised at the July 13th meeting. The issues concerned: 1) parking, 2) fire flow, and 3) the alley access. 1) Parking — The applicant is proposing a two-level parking garage with 72 spaces. This parking would be reserved for the residents of the 58 apartment units. The proposed parking equals a ratio of 1.24 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Forty-four (44) of the 58 units proposed are studio or 1-bedroom apartment units. City parking code requires 1.5 spaces per unit or a total of 87 spaces. In addition, the code requires 1 space per 4 units for guests, equal to 15 guest-parking spaces. However, the site is in the Downtown Core Area and therefore exempt from parking requirements. Since the last meeting staff has reviewed the parking requirements of other jurisdictions. Bellevue's rate for downtown mixed-use proposals is a minimum of 1 parking space per unit with a demand analysis. Bellevue's standard parking requirement is 1.2 spaces per unit for studio and 1-bedroom apartments and 1.6 spaces for 2-bedroom units. Redmond requires 1 space per unit plus 1 space per 4 units for guests in the Redmond Town Center. Outside the Redmond Town Center, parking requirements are 1.2 spaces per studio unit, 1.5 spaces per 1 bedroom unit, and 1.8 per 2-bedroom unit. Seattle requires 1.2 spaces per unit for development with 31 to 60 dwelling units. Using Bellevue's standards, the Daily project would require 75 parking spaces for residents. This is based on 1.2 parking spaces for the 44 studio and 1-bedroom units and 1.6 spaces for the 14 two- bedroom units. Generally, jurisdictions lower their parking requirements for downtown development because of the proximity to transit facilities. Daily Homes is planning to purchase bus passes for all residents so it is anticipated that transit use by residents will be higher than usual. The City is planning improvements to Burnett Avenue S. and parking would be reconfigured to provide head-in parking stalls along the frontage of the subject property. 78 parking spaces are planned on Burnett Avenue S. between S. 3rd Street and S. 4th Street. This parking would be available for the commercial lease space that fronts on Burnett Avenue S. The proposal includes 3,920 square feet of commercial space, which would require 8 parking spaces if the code requirements applied. The 78 parking spaces along Burnett Avenue S. would satisfy the parking needs for the proposed commercial space. This parking could also be considered to provide for the 15 guest parking spaces. It appears that the proposal includes sufficient parking based on the following findings. Most jurisdictions (Bellevue, Redmond, Seattle) have lower parking ratios for smaller multi- family units. Because the large majority of the proposed units a- Judi() and 1-bedroom, the number of proposed garage parking spaces would be sufficient for the residents. This is further supported by the fact that residents are likely to use transit at a higher rate due to the close proximity of Renton Transit Center and with the provision of subsidized transit passes. The 78 parking spaces on Burnett Avenue S. between S. 3rd Street and S. 4th Street would be ample to cover the parking needs of the commercial lease space and for the apartment guest parking. Therefore, staff does not recommend a mitigation measure to require additional parking. 2) Fire Flow - The Fire Department estimated a fire flow requirement of 6,000 gpm based on preliminary plan review. ERC members expressed concern about the capability of existing water lines to provide this fire flow. J.D. Wilson of the Water Utility section has responded to inquiries that the 6,000 gpm can be provided. Part of the flow would come from the 24- inch transmission main to the east in Burnett Avenue S. and the remainder from the 6-inch main to the south in S. 4th Street. The existing main in S. 4th Street would need to be upsized to an 8-inch or 10-inch depending on where the Fire Department wants the hydrants located. 3) Alley Access - Fire has requested that the 16-foot wide alley be widened to 20 feet to allow for emergency equipment access within 150 feet of all points around the building. Staff has confirmed that there is no building setback on the north property line, so there would be no available fire access between the existing Century Office building and the proposed building. There is a through alley approximately 120 feet north of the subject site, connecting between Smithers Avenue S. and Burnett Avenue S. This alley is improved with a 20-foot width and could provide fire access to the north 30 feet of the proposed building. At the south end of the alley, where entering off S. 4th Street, the applicant has designed a handicap ramp and building pilings and the roof cantilevers to the edge of the 16-foot alley. To expand this part of the alley to a 20-foot width would require major revisions to the building plans. The applicant has indicated a willingness to widen the alley to 20 feet in the remaining alley area. Widening the alley would provide access for the existing residents using the alley. Widening the alley would reduce the 11-foot wide landscape area; however, the landscape area would still be adequate for plantings to screening the parking garage. THOMASAHARKEY• DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON JUL 19 1999 July 16, 1999 RECEIVED Peter Rosen Associate Planner City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Burnett Mixed Use THA#99008 13400 Northup Way Suite 30 Bellevue,WA Dear Peter: 98005 T 425.401.6828 Per our discussion regarding fire access to this project, I would like to offer the F 425.401.0630 following suggestions: • As I understand it, the fire department is concerned that the alley is too narrow to meet the standard safe fire truck access requirements. The current R.O.W. width is 16 feet and 20 feet is desired. The need for this access relates to the standard for physically reaching all parts of the building within 150 feet of a parked fire truck. The proposed building is approximately (216) feet long and would therefore require a fire truck to move approximately (66) feet into the alley to properly service this side of the building. We offer these suggestions that would seem to reasonably mitigate this issue. 1. The entire alley appears to be approximately 340 feet long and has a 20 foot plus wide R.O.W. access at both ends. The gap left by the 150 foot rule would only be + 40feet. 2. Upon entering the alley from the south from 2"d Avenue, only (90) feet of alley needs to be 16 feet wide based on the current configuration. Beyond this point (moving north up the alley), the pavement could be widened to 20 feet for (85) feet. This would minimize the potential for approach conflict. 3. The center portion of the building facing onto the alley has a courtyard above the concrete parking garage. .(This is also where the alley could be widened), This would be an ideal fire fighting access location because of the open platform that the non-combustible courtyard would offer and the setback from combustible 99008_Corr_Consultjuris_Ro se n_01.doc frame construction at this location, which would minimize the potential hazards to fire fighters staging from this area. I hope that this is helpful in your discussion with the fire officials. I have every sympathy for their need to minimize personal risk to their emergency staff and hope that this will help them realize potential safety features that are already part of the design. Since el Scott key Principal cc: Sue Carlson Don Daily 99008_Corr_Consult.Juns_Rosen_01.doc „0„, GCO � \. o � aT neFt ilr , 41 F g9g�s,o lnr\v \ G O. agN a Po1Id; 3b .21 DATE: July 6, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 FROM: Jeffrey H Dineen 320 Smithers Ave S Renton WA 98055 (425) 255-5652 SUBJECT: Fourth and Burnett Apartment Complex Land Use Number LU-99-090 ,SA-A,ECF I would like to express conern regarding alley access to the parking garage for the Fourth and Burnett Apartment Complex . As indicated in my Dec . 7th petition to the Renton City Council , a garage for 80-90 cars will generate about 200 car trips daily . There is NO way that the alley will be able to absorb that volume of traffic while allowing current property owners reasonable access to their properties. I also have concerns regarding the single entrance and exit to the garage . This would focus all traffic activity for the garage and would disproportionately and unfairly impact those single family homes that neighbor the entrance/exit . It seems only reasonable that the entrance and exit to the garage be made on fourth in the same manner that the entrance and exit to the alley is on Fourth . f f City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL It DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pa`(cde COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 17, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 87,103 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five"live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South aEd can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five'live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential palling garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4 Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histor a/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • CF5 oja C-1)" --VA) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed� to properly assess this proposal. \ i1 e Re resentative A Date —10 Signature of Director or Authorized p devapp Rev.10/83 I Trespass ' 43.- USINES o Fnf rcemenf WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City ofRenton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY -THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code 46-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code *6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. •Y COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT • CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 9'`-N 235 - 2571 s PROJECT LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF Fourth & Burnett Apartments City of Renton Department of Planning / Building/ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 50.78 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually(residential&commercial combined) CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING Each unit should have solid core doors,preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2"in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Lower unit sliding windows, including glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the panes from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. Solid walls in any stairway or decking should be avoided; this would serve to limit the visibility and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a resident to return home. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly with the numbers at least 6"in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and preferably placed under a light. In addition,there should be some directive outside the building for Page 1 of 2 4 PROJECT LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF Fourth & Burnett Apartments City of Renton Department of Planning/ Building/ Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) visitors. This will also aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. The underground parking will assist in protecting resident's vehicles from auto theft and theft from motor vehicle,but additional care should be taken when it comes to lighting the area. Proper lighting will help residents feel safer traveling to and from their vehicle and it will also help protect the vehicles that will be parked at these locations. I would also go so far as to recommend security entrances at each parking level (card key or key pad,but only if the underground parking spaces are for residents only-which is also suggested. Additional parking areas could be provided outside the building for non- residents.) It is recommended that the residential areas be secured with controlled entrances to dissuade trespassing of non-residents. Landscaping in and around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a business or obtain access to the residential units inside. The description states that the courtyard is "open to the alley." I cannot tell by the plans, but this courtyard should only be utilized by authorized residents and their visitors. Page 2 of 2 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'oh cm s.e...1AitCCO COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 17, 1 ^A,o APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen�� ~� �� PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 '' & , <?f. LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South L� `��� L, SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA cgross): 87,103 sq.ft. V) SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five"live-work" 'Si commercialresidential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five"live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4 Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water L/ght/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstork/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS L'K fZE is._)1-- U t— Cc5 D 4 : i i c 1 7 F/ -.L/D l/o/v1Tol21f' Pff—I2 Sc,IL-S , t',u /NFD L< s Po L1G /-17-, v NT! LA- (c' IJ I EC� 26Ss 7O of' I< I (3�i VI- 12. D ale C0�je, l . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 S 4111111 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Flm Pvesre ti411 COMMENTS DUE: DULY 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 17, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen; PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 • LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South OS SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): 87,103 sq.ft. ....; — { L SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five"live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five"live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential paring garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4 Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Ai/0-71Ve B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • /"Owe, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS p 0 o ,oat ..mac 30 (`%(e)` We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly,?ssess this proposal. C40/1"? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date deva pp Rev.10193 lb 41111. CITY OF RENTON CARO ‘e FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU -N.rO MEMORANDUM DATE: June 30, 1999 TO: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Fire Code Related Comments for Fourth and Burnett Apartments 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 6,000 gpm. Six fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the structure and the secondary hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $388 per multi-family unit: 58 multi-family units x $388.00 = $22,504.00 Fire mitigation fees for the commercial portion of the building is applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building area: 6,692 square feet x $0.52 = $3,479.84 3. An approved fire sprinkler and standpipe system shall be installed throughout the structure. 4. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed throughout the structure. 5. Fire department apparatus access is required within 150-feet of all points on the building. Proposal as shown does provide this required access on the west side of the building. Access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide. Alley shall be widened to 20-feet within 150-feet of the northwest corner of the building. 6. We are recommending a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit and 1 guest space for every two dwelling units. These spaces would be in addition to the parking required to support the retail/commercial activities, which are proposed for the ground floor. CT:ct dally2 410 4116 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P1a,‘?eoteLe_.wake- COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1, 1999 C• r", APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 17, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen `fU� ;) i PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 SdfhC,_,r, r,y LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South �'r yri,„410 SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): 87,103 sq.ft. N SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five live-work" commercialresidential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five"live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential paring garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4 Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS kilolru:;r.it/<4- l LA) !o 12-1 1J14WLa2'�° de , vfrr� TO par rim FGocv �vl Su 04444.0 �a 1' V30/17 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. , -69 ,>,t 1, W0 1 '9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: June 30, 1999 To: Peter Rosen From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review,lit Subject: 4th & Burnett Apartments LUA-99-090, SA-A, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There are existing 12-inch, 6-inch, 4-inch and 8-inch diameter water lines surrounding this property. The project is served by the 196 pressure zone. The proposed project is not located in either APA zone. SEWER—An 8-inch diameter sewer main is located in the alley behind the proposed project. STORM - A preliminary storm drainage plan per King County Surface Water Design standards has been submitted with the application. Downstream public drainage facilities exist to serve the site. STREETS — All the streets are paved. Burnett Avenue is currently under design for reconfiguration at S 3rd Street. Any damaged or sub-standard frontage improvements will be required to meet city standards. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.113 per square foot of property for a fee of $2,862.86. This fee is payable with the construction permit. 2. It may be required to upgrade one or more small diameter water line in the vicinity to obtain appropriate fire flow for the proposed project depending on fire department requirements. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.078 per square foot of property for a fee of $1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.129 per square foot of new impervious surface for a fee of $1,976.13. This fee is payable with the construction permit. dally4th TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per additional Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. This fee has been calculated to be $23,085 which is payable with the building permit. PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the sixth floor counter. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities is required prior to Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. 3. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. CC: Neil Watts dally4th • ( ) ) U n � fir_:«c'-'•�' y� • . ro n,+Z Y , rryw�' +�V,!.'/7'CYO':1.:.'W<Y.Ger/o«�..�•.r w...r ..` •��, e ��� TR��t�SP�.QRTR�TTC�Nlf- TGATJO: FEE Project Name e(//1 /Bdtr vete 4p v t vtitevtt 5 Project Address 331' Buyne(( AV 5 • Contact Person C hGt✓Ise La hoc Gf Der I cl Hug/VS Address Phone Number (206) - 32g -- 3770 Ex-t 211 Permit Number LOA - qq - 0 7O Project Description !/1 wed use 5tvucrt uVtr - 55 ey uc+1 t5 6 '9,t,c• t& vk °tilts a44d 3q2O s.1: ✓cffi f . 701a I cj 72 Pkl sioaceS . Land Use/Type: Method__of�Calculation: r S� Pi 2� y- Residential D" ITE Trip Generation Man al "Retail 0 Traffic Study Re5ruc4141 - 442 fv;i5 0 Non-retail 0 Other , (11 t Crvtc/. (1.icrI v►rif; ) Calculation: - 40.67 pv), loco I�t� atw ct'c�il�� tv� �:; 7 �,�� -r 4G. '7 0 Z Z5`7a ✓rrt�a �� 307 {'c iltl Trlps - At 75 daily trip • ($75) (507- ‘3) _ Z3, °35 Uv Transportation Mitigation Fee: 4- 23 }Qg5 Calculated by: I V eV (V ) Date: 6/8 /qq Account Number: 105. Fig. 3180, 70. 00. Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: —ram -ram COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 17, 1999 ��- '�� O, APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Fgsen tie* AQ PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 41 j OiV LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South tio 4.OQ SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 87,103 sq.ft. `'i. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL' Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five"live-work" 'L, , commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four''stories (50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South aptd can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five"live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4 Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoridCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ti\w a r,�.i�. \ °IC\`\ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ate , Sig ature of Director or Authorized Representative D devapp Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Su jiticel LLS-te_ _liz . , COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99 090,SA-A ECF +' YDATE CIRCULATED: DUNE 17, 1999 Cp., Air-., /1 NT APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen O/V PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 r 4 ,�, LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South ,�L, y ,,� SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 87,103 sq.ft. `#1/4)r`,N SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five"live-work" commercialresidential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and'live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South a1d can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five'live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential paring garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4 Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water LlghvGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS (1-Ottk UM(Al We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. , t/EM � Q� 1.1\' 01 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 ee SI111 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pitrfov'- COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 17, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 87,103 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five"live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South apd can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five"live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 h Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4th Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth 'f Housing ✓ Air V Aesthetics V Water ✓ Light/Glare Plants ✓ Recreation r LandiShoreline Use V Utilities Animals ✓ Transportation V Environmental Health V Public Services ✓ Energy/ r/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet The proposed project is located beneath a heavily travelled aerial route utilized by aircraft approaching and/or departing the Renton Airport. The airport is open for use by aircraft 24-hours per day. The sound made by these aircraft may be heard by residents of the premises throughout the 24-hour period. This should be considered , during insulation and sound deadening design determinations. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS None C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed project is located within 10,000 feet of the runway, beneath the 179' elevation above sea level height restriction. The proposed project lists a 50' above ground level height. We have reviewed this appfcation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher- .+ditional inf-, ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. /i -16 '''i 21 , ci q l Signatur=Director. or Authorized Representative Dat devapp Rev 10/93 11,,4.4A___ 7---E--E7E7K.--K:Kg.--3:1:::_::::: -:::::::33--:::HE:-:-:-:-:---:---- .. lc- - --1-tr? V.-* , ___:_-_,--::___:::___:_::::::_:-..:-::____ ,....... - . 1.2; 7' A; :-:-:-:-:::::::::::::::::::Eff.,:-__ . "li , . Jr --_-_-_-„:„:„...:::--__-_:„,„- ::::::::::::„.....„:„:„..___ ,,. ..7 ,.:, __,....„_:_:_,....„„:::::::::::::„.i... • . . ,:it,,-_,:_:__-----__:,..,__-_-...::::::„......:::„....„:„..:::::„.„:„.____ __,......._,_E„,_________:____,______,____ . ,N /\j .1' f:-::-:-::-E--:::-.:-:-.7:4:-::::-:::_:--E:1.7.:*::::•::.:_7,,:-E:aff-62ZE:113:::::::::::7:0::::_::_:__ _::::::::::::::_:_,H,_:_:-:-::::::::::::::::::: iikiwy i7-4-k-E:::::-_--Eir-E:::;:::::::: :::'::::::::: ::::-:<:>:;i-7:EF.::::::::::F::•:::::::-::E:E:=2:E:K::-::::E::::::-:::::-::::::::::::::::77:tE:::::3-ELEISK:::::::::::::::::::::: "ins., 4 ... ik 1 RIC gjej tit---. , -__-_ - - __-- __ __ -_-�__= om-_-_ __ _ __ ________ "t'�.L°r�-ice Iw t 4GG:wa :l III 1 -=-==- -==--=-==--= -=====-=_====_========_--___-=_=_ _:23/4, .......,„J.__ Niz,. ttzleik. , ,.., ,,,,,_ \ 7 IlLgy, ,\--:::::::.--1:::-.:Ku.:---Kt.K.:-::-...]::-E::e_::::::::-::::--:::::::::;E:::::',573:::::::::;K:.:.:E:E:KL-E:K:::::::-:::::_satE.:Ks_.:IEEE-:.:21:...]:_...:4,N. mi .... --mu , n sm,..,,,i mos /, \. - . rj\-\ --:::::::73K:F.:::::::.:3-3..E.--3,::-:,.,,,_:::„.::-...„_:_-_-::::,„,-,.-gt„,13.:::::„.:::::::_,:_::4_4.4,_„fti 11 a_. ._ ._ k‘._ i u ...rrs,\, ra N I -'"ell _ __ ,. . IL\---1 N7- p.,,. .A , ,,,, , \!".-;-:(-\ E:::.a:::E:K:_--:.::'...--E:K.--E:K:EEEE:E:E:::;Eg,:E:...T:_ :1-E_.:::-.:::::-_.E.]:_.-,-E:::--; z 41 t _ - . _Till i i \--N- ��-7s7II_ ____========= _ - . arc .,, �.:�=- \,Y Mliti 4It:'.'.,4,91( ;S-% 10 r[M C wD 4J (� � 1LrH�L I� ., -AIMEE Mai Ili \ jr1C111 Mt, r'... 5 ! ,,,.,,i..„,. , . .., 0 - , .....— i'- - -II Et'It'. CD immi 'f, )1-.L' "•.4'-'•!..:''`.. ': .49 . i. • 11111 t**), 1 , ,, .OCIDI 1,:„,-,t i '% .' k ) 11.4 it,....w.r. jiia . i ..... • .‘z?!ipAt' 1-01„ _ 't,'11*EFIIIIIIIIPE11-1,1711ii5—'4-'4' 1.111,1 1_, , kr.,_,,_.J.1 .z.liiii ,... zi . „,..4 vil hitit-q.....„-inie-43) , Rip .. ' 4 • I., 1,•-4,'• iirifilil ,--- .. 12L, ,, %,k . ) ,ft, -1 9 Allik „,_, ir c• .4 \ . - - DJ trk ..-- .L1 . . . i ' ' r RieglitrgulthilWil - k• 1/9 'Ai Nilo i, PI • I ' 'nee: 'ACM k. I . 4 , , 4,E1[91 ..td Ail iii 1111,101.11 ...,„.T.,...:• .44....... .rierar - A. ilin ji / LI t M w t.0 • LI '''s(,.,L..:p •' '1'. ':'•.. ...4 I 1 Nia.•;ft7:.-.T,.A I_111 , - -,--„fert eit -.-T.Alw,.... - -ClEird$DP*4",: , ''4 .ir . "..,,,\,,, ,,,,,, ,. . , ,.,,...,:ft,, ‘al[M111-1251c7g 4- , - ... - titi. ' - — 'll ' — ,„„ „., \... --41,440.411f, d - - . ,:',.. 3::00160''c. o LEI. .._ - \\11- 1 , +4- d i' p_. 1.wad,1 .4.ad 2 i:t..,i.r u1._ 1p ':Iu1lLL1 Y t•" 1 ��I11' 1,_.:-_0__0t__o). IIIP- &-• Aii CVVY'' liall 1 :ifii 0, ._. .-.0'A ‘......, .-. e-. ,,,,,-7__ (c6 '' • 7 iiii, ,,, . . . i 101,1111 1 v, ''.• :FN:3(1j3-.)." .:P 1.0.MNPI TILLN\ °‘‘' c'•• tDL1-iirpZi,.d...1I;J 1.Q‘: &-h1, �1 i.i \ IP.'r. lL1__irm,.i:_..__1A;_I:II2....cI."_,:. .l_ r pam,,1.v i4I.\-,-1;.„--:.-,:.. 1..1:.4-_71:- 1k' I,•„m,-b„•i Wi-1,g1.. l.„;411„:1;,,,,, �J �,} �_, ICJ ,ww. u.. 1 I M 4 7 W a 1�I � S f,,0 -_�...� ti - G 7, 1 ': ir''• 1,,y1f 3 ..' LYE'1 1 ` + 1 n ■ ioNa E u 4IP City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: om,yt" e(ta“wut7 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 17, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. 1 BUILDING AREAjgross): 87,103 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 58 apartment units, five"live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories (50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work" residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five"live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4 Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS J176 +s rvFYIc4z crre2 IJOL,4141oc41\1 I r.f P -4Sl-ter -31 %fir PLarv,/two yvL^l7 co NO POucif 5S L3i . <51)_ Rom— Sz esZ,i PL vrv,n, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date devapp Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PLC COMMENTS DUE: JULY 1, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 17, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes/Charlie Laboda PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Fourth and Burnett Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78550 LOCATION: 339 burnett Avenue South SITE AREA 25,300 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 87,103 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units, five'live-work" commercialresidential units, and approximately 3,920 sq.ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories(50- foot maximum height) plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work' residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South avd can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five'live-work' commercial spaces are oriented to South 4 Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off south 4th Street. The main pedestrian entrance to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandrShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HlstoriYCuitural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1'1/171-1.eiy-).tom'( fef - /77 U I `�" ( 6/7 /' (/r c GvyLv� Prib- � Utz 2w1G�G2' i� l/- ci 7" c% C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /9(72,44_ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional info a n I eded to properly assess this proposal. 1 Director797 orAuthori ed Representative Date Signature of devapp Rev.10193 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: 1-111 'gijt/KAG/ / ft?esAW1eVtrs APPLICATION NO: LUA • 9R • ORO, SIP% -A G[1% The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Se-6 afzc 0C (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (t Lab 1f Applicant Certification I,(J^A,r11� ►f9oL . V hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: CI Cit ,of Renton Technical Services Records 0 Ti e Comp y Records ;,•sc�E J.�NF� ou Assessors Records pFj (crl Signe Date c .�. (APPI ant :fit . PUBL►C a NOTARY •.FO 27.Z..` c�• ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a NotarytPublic, in and for the State of u11O t gtdti, residing at �2Qz�1�- on the rr day of i�.r-Q. , 19(49. Signet tg--° (Notary Public) "***For City of Renton Use**** CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, Satv►di&k•Se.c.er; hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City Employee) each listed property owner on 1' ISS *1i Signed 101.44444, k . Seezarer- Date: 1' I S•9l NOTARY ATIST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at 11Lai., on thedt -0? day of c�� , 19 ' tt Signed k)1 U:--4-4 .. listprop.doc U REV 07/98 MARILYN KAMCH E COMMISSION EXPIRES MN& 2 Gary&Janice Faull VERSIDATA SYSTEMS INC Boyd Buckingham Jr. Gary Faull 321 Burnett Ave S#200 321 Burnett Ave S#401 PO Box 26 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98057 Wesley Kelson PACIFIC COAST RY CO Alice Reiman Erickson 833 108Th Ave Ne 1700 E Golf Rd#400 7600 Se 29Th St#201 Bellevue, WA 98004 Schaumburg, IL 60173 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Jack Arnold RENTON COMMERCE CENTER Ron& Rosemary Halsen 10805 Glen Acres Dr S PO Box 1113 707 S 4Th St Seattle, WA 98168 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98055 Gene& Huong Sens FRANK R VAISE POST 1263 Timothy McCormick 7259 S Sunnycrest Rd 416 Burnett Ave S#04254- 15531 Se 168Th St Seattle, WA 98178 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98058 David Princhetta Steven& Robert White John Alvin Zandt 13655 171St Ave Se 500 Wall St#417 5963 Rainier Ave S Renton, WA 98059 Seattle, WA 98121 Seattle, WA 98118 Lydia Pickup GOOD PARTNERSHIP QUINTON 83D MALL LLC 605 Houser Way S 617 S 3Rd St PO Box 461 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Redmond, WA 98073 Paul Ohnemus Jeffrey& Lisa Miner Jeffrey Dineen 312 Smithers Ave S #B 316 Smithers Ave S 320 Smithers Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 LODGE RENTON NO 8 10 O F Michael Frankel Charlie Bergemann 324 Smithers Ave S PO Box 2275 336 Smithers Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Toluca Lake, CA 91610 Renton, WA 98055 Kaisha Ann& Richard Basquette Sr. Sandra Tyrone Gollier CITY OF RENTON 340 Smithers Ave S PO Box 128 200 Mill Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98055 J Bert Roberts SUNLITE RESTAURANT INC Robert& Diane Newman 280 Hardie Ave SW#4 509 S 3Rd St 341 Smithers Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Mui Lam&Nhi Vong Barbara Ellen Thumlert George&Nadine Bina 2321 22Nd Ave S 17576 12Th Ave Ne 329 Smithers Ave S Seattle, WA 98144 Seattle, WA 98155 Renton,WA 98055 Hoyt Comeaux Dodson Ray&Julie Johnson David Loebe 321 Smithers Ave S 18808 Se 170Th St PO Box 996 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98058 Renton, WA 98057 AWARENESS OF LIFE CHURC Joe Regis 311 Smithers Ave S 505 S 4Th St Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 ******************************* * Search Parameters * ******************************* * King (WA) * 06/03/99 * 15:35:54 ******************************* Parcel Number. . .47 783930 0250 783930 0230 783930 0240 783930 0260 783930 0270 783930 0275 783930 0280 783930 0285 783930 0295 783930 0300 783930 0305 783930 0315 783930 0340 783930 0345 150580 0010 thru 150580 0040 723150 2330 723150 2320 723150 2325 723150 2300 723150 2380 723150 2385 723150 2387 723150 2390 723150 2350 723150 2370 723150 2480 783930 0155 783930 0165 783930 0125 783930 0130 783980 0005 783980 0100 783980 0110 783980 0115 783980 0120 783980 0125 783980 0130 783980 0135 783980 0140 783980 0145 783930 0290 troScan / King (WA) Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone 150580 0010 09 Versidata Systems Inc 321 Burnett Ave S #1 Ren 1980 425-271-8686 150580 0020 07 Versidata Systems Inc 321 Burnett Ave S #2 Ren 1980 425-271-8686 150580 0030 05 Faull Gary F/Janice L 321 Burnett Ave S #3 Ren 1980 150580 0040 03 Faull Gary F 321 Burnett Ave S #4 Ren 1980 723150 2300 08 Kelson Wesley R 332 Burnett Ave S Renton 1950 723150 2320 04 Brower Martha E Truste 340 Burnett Ave S Renton 1941 723150 2325 09 Pacific Coast Ry Co Operating Renton 723150 2330 02 Erickson Alice Reiman 323 Williams Ave S Rento 1945 723150 2350 07 Arnold Jack G 321 Williams Ave S Rento 1954 206-246-3352 723150 2370 03 Renton Commerce Center 715 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1928 723150 2380 01 Halsen Ron & Rosemary 707 S 4Th St Renton 9805 1985 425-226-8430 723150 2385 06 Sens Gene P/Huong T 406 Burnett Ave S Renton 1916 723150 2387 04 Sens Gene P/Huong T 410 Burnett Ave S Renton 723150 2390 09 Frank R Vaise Post 126 416 Burnett Ave S Renton 1920 723150 2480 00 Mccormick Timothy J 711 S 4Th St Renton 9805 1953 425-271-2754 783930 0125 06 Princhetta David 421 Burnett Ave S Renton 1980 783930 0130 09 White Steven M/Robert 621 Houser Way S Renton 783930 0155 09 Zandt John Alvin 611 Houser Way S Renton 1900 206-722-4935 783930 0165 07 Pickup Lydia I 605 Houser Way S Renton 1941 425-235-8720 783930 0230 08 Good Partnership 617 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1942 783930 0240 06 Good Partnership 611 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1923 783930 0250 03 Quinton 83D Mall Llc 601 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 1962 783930 0260 01 Ohnemus Paul D 312 Smithers Ave S Rento 1900 206-227-5267 783930 0270 09 Miner Jeffrey A/Lisa D 316 Smithers Ave S Rento 1923 425-277-2170 783930 0275 04 Dineen Jeffrey 320 Smithers Ave S Rento 1906 425-255-5652 783930 0280 07 Lodge Renton No 8 I 0 324 Smithers Ave S Rento 1920 783930 0285 02 Frankel Michael B 330 Smithers Ave S Rento 1908 783930 0285 02 Frankel Michael B 330 Smithers Ave S Rento 1944 783930 0290 05 Bergemann Charlie A 336 Smithers Ave S Rento 1923 425-226-2826 783930 0295 00 Basquette Kaisha Ann/R 340 Smithers Ave S Rento 1920 783930 0300 03 Gollier Tyrone B 346 Smithers Ave S Rento 1902 783930 0305 08 City Of Renton 339 Burnett Ave S Renton 783930 0315 06 City Of Renton 333 Burnett Ave S Renton 1965 783930 0340 05 Roberts J Bert Burnett Ave S Renton 425-226-8836 783930 0345 00 Roberts J Bert 311 Burnett Ave S Renton 1902 425-226-8836 783930 0345 00 Roberts J Bert 311 Burnett Ave S Renton 1942 425-226-8836 783980 0005 00 Sunlite Restaurant Inc 511 S 3Rd St Renton 9805 425-228-4320 783980 0100 04 Newman Robert E/Diane 341 Smithers Ave S Rento 1902 425-277-1287 783980 0110 02 Lam Mui C;Vong Nhi C 335 Smithers Ave S Rento 1924 783980 0115 07 Thumlert Barbara Ellen 331 Smithers Ave S Rento 1923 206-363-7535 783980 0120 00 Bina George J & Nadine 329 Smithers Ave S Rento 1937 425-255-2930 783980 0125 05 Dodson Hoyt Comeaux 321 Smithers Ave S Rento 1910 783980 0130 08 Johnson Ray N & Julie 317 Smithers Ave S Rento 1903 425-255-4709 783980 0130 08 Johnson Ray N & Julie 317 Smithers Ave S Rento 1944 425-255-4709 783980 0135 03 Loebe David A 315 Smithers Ave S Rento 1912 783980 0140 06 Awareness Of Life Chur 311 Smithers Ave S Rento 1904 425-228-4344 783980 0145 01 Regis Joe 505 S 4Th St Renton 9805 1943 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ******************************* * Search Parameters * ******************************* * King (WA) * 06/03/99 * 15:35:30 ******************************* Parcel Number. . .47 783930 0250 783930 0230 783930 0240 783930 0260 783930 0270 783930 0275 783930 0280 783930 0285 783930 0295 783930 0300 783930 0305 783930 0315 783930 0340 783930 0345 150580 0010 thru 150580 0040 723150 2330 723150 2320 723150 2325 723150 2300 723150 2380 723150 2385 723150 2387 723150 2390 723150 2350 723150 2370 723150 2480 783930 0155 783930 0165 783930 0125 783930 0130 783980 0005 783980 0100 783980 0110 783980 0115 783980 0120 783980 0125 783980 0130 783980 0135 783980 0140 783980 0145 783930 0290 # 1' • * MetroScan / King * Owner :Versidata Systems Inc Parcel # :150580 0010 09 Site :321 Burnett Ave S #1 Renton 98055 Sale Date :10/29/96 Mail :321 Burnett Ave S #200 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$190, 000 Use :311 Off,Condominium,Less Than 5K Sqft Asd.V :$205, 000 Lgl :LOT UNIT 1 CENTURY 321 PLAZA Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:4 BldgSF:3,850 Ac: .11 YB:1980 Ph:425-271-8686 # 2 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Versidata Systems Inc Parcel # :150580 0020 07 Site :321 Burnett Ave S #2 Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/06/94 Mail :321 Burnett Ave S #2Nd Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$175, 000 Full Use :311 Off,Condominium,Less Than 5K Sqft Asd.V :$205, 000 Lgl :LOT UNIT 2 CENTURY 321 PLAZA Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:4 BldgSF:3,850 Ac: .11 YB:1980 Ph:425-271-8686 # 3 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Faull Gary F/Janice L Et Al Parcel # :150580 0030 05 Site :321 Burnett Ave S #3 Renton 98055 Sale Date :02/07/96 Mail :321 Burnett Ave S #401 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$150,000 Full Use :311 Off,Condominium,Less Than 5K Sqft Asd.V :$205, 000 Lgl :LOT UNIT 3 CENTURY 321 PLAZA Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:4 BldgSF:3,850 Ac: .11 YB:1980 Ph: # 4 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Faull Gary F Parcel # :150580 0040 03 Site :321 Burnett Ave S #4 Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 26 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price . Use :311 Off,Condominium,Less Than 5K Sqft Asd.V :$205, 000 Lgl :LOT UNIT 4 CENTURY 321 PLAZA Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:4 BldgSF:3,850 Ac: .11 YB:1980 Ph: # 5 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Kelson Wesley R Parcel # :723150 2300 08 Site :332 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :04/06/83 Mail :833 108Th Ave NE Bellevue Wa 98004 Sale Price :$280, 000 Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$356,300 Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 7-8 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:10,000 Ac: .27 YB:1950 Ph: # 6 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Brower Martha E Trustee Parcel # :723150 2320 04 Site :340 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :02/18/99 Mail Sale Price . Use :430 Pub,Tavern,Lounge Asd.V :$77, 300 Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 9 RENTON TOWN OF LESS Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,755 Ac: .08 YB:1941 Ph: # 7 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Pacific Coast Ry Co Parcel # :723150 2325 09 Site :Operating Renton Sale Date . Mail :1700 E Golf Rd #400 Schaumburg Il 60173 Sale Price . Use :953 Misc,Right-Of-Way,Utility Asd.V . Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 9 RENTON TOWN OF R R Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .06 YB: Ph: # 8 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Erickson Alice Reiman Parcel # :723150 2330 02 Site :323 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :04/15/93 Mail :7600 SE 29Th St #201 Mercer Island Wa 98040 Sale Price . Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$279,100 Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 10-11 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:9,800 Ac: .24 YB:1945 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • # 9 " * MetroScan / King * Owner :Arnold Jack G Parcel # :723150 2350 07 Site :321 Williams Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/15/95 Mail :10805 Glen Acres Dr S Seattle Wa 98168 Sale Price :$125, 000 Full Use :425 Pub,Restaurant,Lounges Asd.V :$129,700 Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 12 RENTON TOWN OF E 110 Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:3, 900 Ac: .12 YB:1954 Ph:206-246-3352 # 10 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton Commerce Center Llp Parcel # :723150 2370 03 Site :715 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/12/97 Mail :PO Box 1113 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price :$400, 000 Full Use :252 Com,Retail Store, l0K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$405, 500 Lgl :BLK 26 LOT 16-17 RENTON TOWN OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:11, 160 Ac: .27 YB:1928 Ph: # 11 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Halsen Ron & Rosemary Parcel # :723150 2380 01 Site :707 S 4Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date :04/05/82 Mail :707 S 4Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$34, 000 Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$111,500 Lgl :BLK 27 LOT 1 RENTON TOWN OF LOT 1 Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,239 Ac: .13 YB:1985 Ph:425-226-8430 # 12 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sens Gene P/Huong T Parcel # :723150 2385 06 Site :406 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :11/24/93 Mail :7259 S Sunnycrest Rd Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price :$118,000 Full Use :261 Off, l-3 Story,Less Than 5K Sqft Asd.V :$81,300 Lgl :BLK 27 LOT 2 RENTON TOWN OF LOT 2 Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,584 Ac: .10 YB:1916 Ph: # 13 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sens Gene P/Huong T Parcel # :723150 2387 04 Site :410 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :01/17/95 Mail :7259 S Sunnycrest Rd Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price :$220,000 Full Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$221,500 Lgl :BLK 27 LOT 2 & 3 RENTON TOWN OF S Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:4,800 Ac: .15 YB: Ph: # 14 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Frank R Vaise Post 1263 Parcel # :723150 2390 09 Site :416 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :416 Burnett Ave S #04254- Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :408 Pub,Clubs,Business,Labor,Fraternal Asd.V :$175,600 Lgl :BLK 27 LOT 4-5 RENTON TOWN OF LOTS Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:6,685 Ac: .26 YB:1920 Ph: # 15 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Mccormick Timothy J Parcel # :723150 2480 00 Site :711 S 4Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date :10/31/88 Mail :15531 SE 168Th St Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price :$90, 000 Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$195, 900 Lgl :BLK 27 LOT 20 RENTON TOWN OF LOT Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:5,250 Ac: .13 YB:1953 Ph:425-271-2754 # 16 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Princhetta David Parcel # :783930 0125 06 Site :421 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/02/98 Mail :13655 171St Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$240, 000 Full Use :104 Res,Fourplex Asd.V :$201,700 Lgl :BLK 32 LOT 1-2-3 SMITHERS 1ST ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:2, 928 Ac: .13 YB:1980 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • # 17 ' * MetroScan / King - * Owner :White Steven M/Robert W Parcel # :783930 0130 09 Site :621 Houser Way S Renton 98055 Sale Date :01/24/94 Mail :500 Wall St #417 Seattle Wa 98121 Sale Price :$128,500 Full Use :104 Res,Fourplex Asd.V :$140,000 Lgl :BLK 32 LOT 1-2-3 SMITHERS 1ST ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:l Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:2, 930 Ac: .18 YB: Ph: # 18 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Zandt John Alvin Parcel # :783930 0155 09 Site :611 Houser Way S Renton 98055 Sale Date :09/05/86 Mail :5963 Rainier Ave S Seattle Wa 98118 Sale Price :$30, 000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$77, 000 Lgl :BLK 32 LOT 4 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1, 120 Ac: .09 YB:1900 Ph:206-722-4935 # 19 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Pickup Lydia I Parcel # :783930 0165 07 Site :605 Houser Way S Renton 98055 Sale Date :11/30/94 Mail :605 Houser Way S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$53, 000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$59,000 Lgl :BLK 32 LOT 5 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:l Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:620 Ac: .08 YB:1941 Ph:425-235-8720 # 20 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Good Partnership Parcel # :783930 0230 08 Site :617 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :03/24/97 Mail :613 S 3Rd St #A Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$360,000 Full Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$494,300 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 1-2 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:9,336 Ac: .24 YB:1942 Ph: # 21 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Good Partnership Parcel # :783930 0240 06 Site :611 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :03/24/97 Mail :617 S 3Rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$360, 000 Full Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10K Sqft Asd.V :$203, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 3-4 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:5,730 Ac: .22 YB:1923 Ph: # 22 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Quinton 83D Mall Llc Parcel # :783930 0250 03 Site :601 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/18/96 Mail :PO Box 461 Redmond Wa 98073 Sale Price . Use :261 Off, 1-3 Story,Less Than 5K Sqft Asd.V :$236,100 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 5-6 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:4,640 Ac: .24 YB:1962 Ph: # 23 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Ohnemus Paul D Parcel # :783930 0260 01 Site :312 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/04/90 Mail :312 Smithers Ave S #B Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$125, 000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$91, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 7-8 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 .5 B1dgSF:2, 150 Ac: .22 YB:1900 Ph:206-227-5267 # 24 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Miner Jeffrey A/Lisa D Parcel # :783930 0270 09 Site :316 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :10/10/96 Mail :316 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$130, 000 Use :103 Res,Triplex Asd.V :$132, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 9 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:3/ / Stories:1.5 B1dgSF:2,850 Ac: .11 YB:1923 Ph:425-277-2170 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • # 25' * MetroScan / King * Owner :Dineen Jeffrey Parcel # :783930 0275 04 Site :320 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :320 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$113, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 10 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,170 Ac: .11 YB:1906 Ph:425-255-5652 # 26 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Lodge Renton No 8 I 0 0 F Parcel # :783930 0280 07 Site :324 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :08/05/83 Mail :324 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :408 Pub,Clubs,Business,Labor,Fraternal Asd.V :$103,300 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 11 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:4, 144 Ac: .11 YB:1920 Ph: # 27 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Frankel Michael B Parcel # :783930 0285 02 Site :330 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/10/90 Mail :PO Box 2275 Toluca Lake Ca 91610 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$107, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 12 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,250 Ac: .11 YB:1908 Ph: # 28 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Frankel Michael B Parcel # :783930 0285 02 Site :330 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/10/90 Mail :PO Box 2275 Toluca Lake Ca 91610 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$107, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 12 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:l Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:720 Ac: .11 YB:1944 Ph: # 29 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Bergemann Charlie A Parcel # :783930 0290 05 Site :336 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :09/08/94 Mail :336 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$95, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 13 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE 5:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,420 Ac: .11 YB:1923 Ph:425-226-2826 # 30 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Basquette Kaisha Ann/Richard W Sr/Sandra Parcel # :783930 0295 00 Site :340 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :02/13/98 Mail :340 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$100, 000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$82, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 14 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,200 Ac: .11 YB:1920 Ph: # 31 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Gollier Tyrone B Parcel # :783930 0300 03 Site :346 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :04/02/92 Mail :PO Box 128 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$126, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 15 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:4 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:2 .5 B1dgSF:3,450 Ac: .09 YB:1902 Ph: # 32 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :783930 0305 08 Site :339 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/95 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$54,800 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 16-17 SMITHERS 1ST ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .14 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. # 33 • * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :783930 0315 06 Site :333 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/95 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900,000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$168,200 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 18 THRU 21 SMITHERS 1ST Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:190 Ac: .44 YB:1965 Ph: # 34 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Roberts J Bert Parcel # :783930 0340 05 Site :Burnett Ave S Renton Sale Date :07/31/92 Mail :280 Hardie Ave SW #4 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$154,000 Full Use :921 Vacant,Commercial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$40,800 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 23 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph:425-226-8836 # 35 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Roberts J Bert Parcel # :783930 0345 00 Site :311 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :08/03/92 Mail :280 Hardie Ave SW #4 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$58, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 24 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1.5 B1dgSF:1,630 Ac: .11 YB:1902 Ph:425-226-8836 # 36 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Roberts J Bert Parcel # :783930 0345 00 Site :311 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :08/03/92 Mail :280 Hardie Ave SW #4 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$58, 000 Lgl :BLK 33 LOT 24 SMITHERS 1ST ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:l Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:410 Ac: .11 YB:1942 Ph:425-226-8836 # 37 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sunlite Restaurant Inc Parcel # :783980 0005 00 Site :511 S 3Rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :09/12/95 Mail :509 S 3Rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$103,300 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 1-2 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .24 YB: Ph:425-228-4320 # 38 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Newman Robert E/Diane M Parcel # :783980 0100 04 Site :341 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :03/20/91 Mail :341 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$125, 000 Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$135,000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 16-17 SMITHERS 2ND ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:7 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:2 B1dgSF:2,490 Ac: .21 YB:1902 Ph:425-277-1287 # 39 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Lam Mui C;Vong Nhi C Parcel # :783980 0110 02 Site :335 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :04/21/93 Mail :2321 22Nd Ave S Seattle Wa 98144 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$82, 000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 18 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:960 Ac: .11 YB:1924 Ph: # 40 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Thumlert Barbara Ellen Parcel # :783980 0115 07 Site :331 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :01/28/86 Mail :17576 12Th Ave NE Seattle Wa 98155 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$82, 000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 19 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1, 110 Ac: .11 YB:1923 Ph:206-363-7535 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ,# ill, * MetroScan / King : ----- * Owner :Bina George J & Nadine E Parcel # :783980 0120 00 Site :329 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :02/07/95 Mail :329 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$59,000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 20 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,330 Ac: .11 YB:1937 Ph:425-255-2930 # 42 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Dodson Hoyt Comeaux Parcel # :783980 0125 05 Site :321 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :10/22/85 Mail :321 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$83, 000 Use :102 Res,Duplex Asd.V :$136, 000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 21 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:2,530 Ac: .11 YB:1910 Ph: # 43 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Johnson Ray N & Julie A Parcel # :783980 0130 08 Site :317 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :18808 SE 170Th St Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$95, 000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 22 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:960 Ac: .11 YB:1903 Ph:425-255-4709 # 44 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Johnson Ray N & Julie A Parcel # :783980 0130 08 Site :317 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :18808 SE 170Th St Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$95, 000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 22 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:l Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:1,040 Ac: .11 YB:1944 Ph:425-255-4709 # 45 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Loebe David A Parcel # :783980 0135 03 Site :315 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/28/88 Mail :PO Box 996 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price :$61, 000 Use :102 Res,Duplex Asd.V :$100, 000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 23 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:2/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:1,640 Ac: .11 YB:1912 Ph: # 46 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Awareness Of Life Church Parcel # :783980 0140 06 Site :311 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :311 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$88, 000 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 24 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,400 Ac: .11 YB:1904 Ph:425-228-4344 # 47 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Regis Joe Parcel # :783980 0145 01 Site :505 S 4Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :505 S 4Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :252 Com,Retail Store, l0K-25K Sqft Asd.V :$348,000 Lgl :BLK 35 LOT 1-2-3 SMITHERS 2ND ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:14,712 Ac: .34 YB:1943 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • ()' 0,) • Density: The proposal Includes 58 residential units and would have a net density of 100 dwelling units per acre.The CD zone allows a residential density range of 25 to 100 dwelllrp unlls per rue. NT Environmental Documents that None. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Evaluate the Proposed Project Development Regulations AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance,Zoning Code. Subdivision Ordinance,Public Works Standard's,etc. These adopted codes and NON-SIGNIFICANCE—MITIGATED (DNS-M) standards will function to mitigate project impacts. DATE: June 17,1999 Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be Imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation Measures LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF address project Impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. APPUCATION NAME: FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee-$76.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units,Eve live-work' 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-$388.00 per new multifamily dwelling unit. commercial/residential units,and approximately 3,920 sq.R.of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories(50-foot maximum height)plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and'live-work'residences. 3.Parks Mitigation fee-8354.51 per new multifamily dwelling unit. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided Into Individual spaces with separate street Used For Project Mitigation: entries. The five'live-work'commercial spaces are oriented to South 4"Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles Is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels).The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4°i Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area Is from Burnett Avenue South. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5,00 PM on July 9,1999. If you have questions about PROJECT LOCATION: 339 Bumen Avenue South this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Rosen at the number listed below. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNSM): As the Lead Agency.the City of Renton notified of any decision on this project. has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to resuit from the proposed project Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN(425)430-7219 is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated Into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Detemrinatlon of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS- PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION My A 14 day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 11,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCATION: June 17,1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes,Inc.,3318 Fuhnnan Ave.E.,Seattle,WA 98102 __ Phone:(206)328-3770 -`" --L- % p Z \' OWNER: City of Revlon .,„�),I. 1 2, I Imo.'"I ;�,� x s PERMITS/REVIEW REQUESTED: SEPA Environmental Review(ECF);Administrative Site Plan Approval(SA-A I li } '4 'PrAll,-T'-.;i i OTHER PERMITS WHICH MAY p •I ,.I F BE REQUIRED: Construction and Building Permits tiI'M gt.ni. - -- : � -�- ere'.° REQUESTED STUDIES: Preliminary Drainage Report,Geotechniwl Report �:,; a'/a'1� �-a vr� ;:7,;1 ,r)1` ,.P a.w LOCATION WHERE APPLICATION MAY :! I "3%.-k34 a 4-a eec a -m BE REVIEWED: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services 4 f rr a'!7 Syp htif @ 4- ;-61.2' Department,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 .L- • PUBLIC HEARING: No public hearing is required.Administrative review only. Pig Ire - d'2��w1T y,pkr: gas .-Try 17 `4, 1 ' : TT9 CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ; I 'I— Ij.�'j-� Yja Analytical process A' A-R ii r � _ Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their 6 = :its1N1YYi!"l 411 a.,.8 iF absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 38.705.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)Include a •�-:`a ei11` - sits;'rwTio 14 e• statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, I,'INI •1, ate E ra Infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall �. I „'g°"' ..iQdgs s Q n I Include a determination of Me ed's consistency with the zoning, t R`='�.. $kW a°ece / proj ty ng,comprehensive plan and development regulations. 10.4411- 1t-- —-i. LT a �` 6 ' f . Land Use: The project site w located in the Center Downtown(CD)zone and Center DowntownIN s" 3 - ��77�vp raa o11 m�_dy'Ora;7 Comprehensive Plan Map designation. The site Is also located inside the Neill 0 61P e' .;ra v�-;ug - Downtown Core Area.The proposal appears to be consistent with the development ' ' `� t'S6''a" �� f Downtown of the CD zone and Cexempt from parking Plan policies.requirements, Development st to the 'h�i' .., .,. ::e _I c F1 A i`. Downtown Core Area Is exempt from parking requirements,front/street setback. I' P*,• f( landscaping,and lot coverage standards of the CD zone. 'R' q Yls pormakt isnmil CERTIFICATION I, i)e.,- e< ��-eir\ , hereby certify that -3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ,'(cam. Lg1 L'Q.9 Signed: , _ ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing if). -� ->n , on the a.A .r- day of / `1 Y • ,... 7/ e.a.-/-1/1_ cAtir MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES(12619 - , • n tFe • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: June 17,1999 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: FOURTH AND BURNETT APARTMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal for a mixed-use structure consisting of 53 apartment units,five"live-work" commercial/residential units, and approximately 3,920 sq. ft. of retail commercial lease space. The building would be four stories(50-foot maximum height)plus a basement with the upper three levels for the apartments and"live-work"residences. The commercial lease space fronts Burnett Avenue South and can be divided into individual spaces with separate street entries. The five "live-work" commercial spaces are oriented to South 4th Street. A residential parking garage for 72 vehicles is provided on two levels(basement and ground levels). The garage entrance is from the alley off South 4th Street. The main pedestrian entry to the residential units and the two-story lobby/common area is from Burnett Avenue South. PROJECT LOCATION: 339 Burnett Avenue South OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNS- M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 11, 1999 V/ NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 17, 1999 APPLICANT: Daily Homes,Inc.,3316 Fuhrman Ave.E.,Seattle,WA 98102 1. 0 . Phone: (206)328-3770 4 coilA rg1titi OWNER: City of Renton PERMITS/REVIEW REQUESTED: SEPA Environmental Review(ECF);Administrative Site Plan Approval(SA-A OTHER PERMITS WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED: Construction and Building Permits REQUESTED STUDIES: Preliminary Drainage Report,Geotechnical Report LOCATION WHERE APPLICATION MAY •! BE REVIEWED: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: No public hearing is required. Administrative review only. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations, or in their absence, comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g) provides that the Notice of Application (NOA) include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use, level of development, infrastructure, and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum, every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: The project site is located in the Center Downtown(CD)zone and Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan Map designation. The site is also located inside the Downtown Core Area. The proposal appears to be consistent with the development standards of the CD zone and Comprehensive Plan policies. Development in the Downtown Core Area is exempt from parking requirements, front/street setback, landscaping,and lot coverage standards of the CD zone. genmalot Density: The proposal includes 58 residential units and would have a net density of 100 dwelling units per acre. The CD zone allows a residential density range of 25 to 100 dwelling units per acre. Environmental Documents that None. Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's Environmental Ordinance, Zoning Code, Subdivision Ordinance, Public Works Standard's, etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1.Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75.00 per new average daily trip attributed to the proposal. 2.Fire Mitigation Fee-$388.00 per new multi-family dwelling unit. 3.Parks Mitigation fee-$354.51 per new multi-family dwelling unit. Used For Project Mitigation: Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on July 6, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Mr. Rosen at the number listed below. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: PETER ROSEN (425)430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION n ta, • ti' N --,.., •,. ®• atp, iT >f2r ar. �► Olf- akez, let ar 4 fats u au rc a ea ae �4!'" T wpm's! ��,.,�Ars:! rd. r,•,,,,..r.11.Via, I I)1b �q Emci 111 ta•GC,fAfrA �j �...,� I it GZ TIMM 1 DIME�_ Mild!fi3 ir2e7' - MI •f{it'i nap 'd� i? . _.i aarrc.y:r. ss E...z.• • NM! YAMPA o;•(] Y�]3 laws of e. »>t. I grow, C 71Q .. 4 ,,,, '.Itt• •. ou.�a ar-lrrn c:Li ar.lc;a. �'am C amaAr�,, w:z ix warmly aoaro,arrl'r1{��i an- v 1ir1Y" bQ�;lS� r,H: catg r° t 'zA3ut _:7�0�t `• 3 ,1 vos:zViea,c sr II ,� o laa$- acrr�. -' t', aiy' , �+ ...o .I e ' as 2.kui .mff, •`@ ra ac: nff..- y+ g� N , i �+', $mac: ..'�l�av�� �� ara1rm,ammo a �a .r S t I l' 6:71�.op.7. aeirsa ally DFl�n" ^o•� { s- L�T�.1y�4-3�'F II I D�rJC .i yy� ——, .0 '4 MI + iQ £I s ari i, l6.7:lcrira.(Xbiin I a-i' c'n El Eo•OrdL3 IGCt: .^• •�alal1 es armor ma ce i w•.z:lac�oca aG7yCq 11 !�.'1 Qa• s Ora rar r c:m o<J.W:�a©.L� aG�.�J 7. '✓.I'4 oiti�Llc�' .3'9a rim ['aa+i.sic.-. . aLi.x-a'i .a z.. I are amcm ate.. .1 I ov:�i7 �nr.� t�I'e�►�]'"� ore�•'or]r� ay k �■ asp rn Et!i]r. ER Emu r.• �. n.tlrr'�t ara rt�aa��ra rs!am z� � �swa:.: �r rd.„:„k .''.t�� nra wr-nr�cs. °— - flnci a rs ars r c .., ,. ,'1r ' SW. -,(. A Wale IIF A 14' II1 aenmalot Resident Resident Resident 312 Smithers Avenue South 316 Smithers Avenue South 330 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Resident Ms. Bettie Smith Ms. Jeanette Schultz 336 Smithers Avenue South 315 Smithers Avenue South 317 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Resident Ms. Rebecca Lloyd Resident 321 Smithers Avenue South 331 Smithers Avenue South 340 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Resident Resident Resident 320 Smithers Avenue South 329 Smithers Avenue South 396 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Resident Resident 311 Smithers Avenue South 341 Smithers Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 CITY (iF RENTON : Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 17, 1999 Mr. Charlie Laboda Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 SUBJECT: Fourth and Burnett Apartments Project No. LUA-99-090,SA-A,ECF Dear Mr. Laboda: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on July 13, 1999. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Peter Rosen _ Project arcyt 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 N - N THOMASHARKEY Architects ELO uEVC17y OF PMENT pi June 10, 1999 RENTON J[1� 1 1999 BURNETT MIXED USE RECEIVED THA#99008 SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL PROJECT NARRATIVE :-� EXISTING CONDITIONS 13400 Nortbup Way SITE Suite 30 The project site is bounded by Burnett Avenue South to the east, by S. 4th Street to Bellevue.WA the south, and by an alley to the north. The property is a nearly rectangular shaped 98005 lot in downtown Renton. It consists of two parcels with the area of 25,335 square T 425.401.6828 feet (0.58 acres). The site and adjacent properties are zoned mixed commercial (CM) in the downtown core area. F 425.401.0630 Currently, the site is used as an asphalt covered parking lot. The ground is relatively flat with a general slope of 0.5% from the east to the west. CONTEXT Across the alley there are existing single family and multifamily, one and two story wood frame buildings. An existing four story, brick exterior office building is located along the north property line. To the south and across S. 4th Street lies the Spirit of Washington Train Depot. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A single, mixed use, four story plus basement structure is proposed with street-front commercial spaces, 58 residential units and residential units and residential parking garage for 72 vehicles. PARKING Parking is provided on two levels. With garage entrance from the alley, the basement parking garage contains 35 stalls. Via ramp from lower garage, the upper parking garage provides space for 37 more cars. RETAIL/COMMERCIAL A larger, flexible, retail-commercial lease space shell is proposed along Burnett Avenue South. The space is about 28 feet wide, 140 feet long and can be divided into individual spaces with separate entrances from Burnett Avenue South. 99008_Corr DD-CD_site plan approval.doc Along South 4th Street, five individual "Live-Work" office/retail/commercial spaces are located at basement level. These spaces are about 500 square feet each, accessible by ramp and steps from the street. RESIDENTIAL The upper three levels are exclusively residential uses, containing a total of 53 apartment units. These units are flats, ranging from 500 square feet studios to 1,200 square feet, two bedroom, two bath units with the majority being one bedroom, one bath combination. A landscaped courtyard is being proposed over the upper garage. The court is open to the alley and is bounded by residential units on the north, east and south. Directly above the five "live work" commercial spaces are 5 "live work" residential units with entrances from both South 4th Street and from the first floor common corridor. The main entrance to the residential units and to the two story lobby/common area is located along Burnett Avenue South on street level. STATISTICS Total lot coverage on ground level is 94.4%. Total residential floor areas, including common areas: 57,466 square feet Total commercial/retail area 6,822 square feet Average height of building at parapets is approximately 49 feet above the adjacent sidewalk highest point of building is the stair penthouse at the roof: about 59 feet above grade. MISCELLANEOUS Future public improvement work by others, including new sidewalk and parking configuration may influence building design elements on street level along Burnett Avenue South and South 46` Street. This proposal does not include these improvements. Sincer 1 , Scott key Principal 99008_Corr DD-CD_site plan approval.doc ii•CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT . . ..... ..........."...... .......-............................................ . . , ....,,,,:;:::„:„:„,„:„,„,„„:„„,„,;„,„,,:,,„:„„:„,:,:„::.,,,,:,:,...,, MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNERS? PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, g pte.ase attach an add)tionel` notarized Master Application for each owner . PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:NAME: l2 t<<ti 14o're5 (nc - /C.r of v,.Ewiot-i rUuri(, ou,--et /PAKt t TS anot oy- 61.ss14 nc. i+ `�� PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 331(P he'tea" U� F. A-Ve _)CA.-4*1�i VI)A cls I 0 - �� �l f�'� ' CITY: ZIP: G)g �Q^� KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): cDeA4Fk�, WA- // .-7$31 -6 - O 3 0s - 1 q(' "130 - Co' I S- -UC7 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): @OLi) 37 �d #� APPLICANT (if other than owner) ?���;il PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: ( vv1 1( 6C1/4"- q C-C nv1€yC,L& f'('Cam, COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CD ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): (/ CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON 1\'I/ DEVELOPMENT PU'.i SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): CITY OF RENTC NAME: Clqa17La I bo(((c- 3ooSF JUN i 1999 COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: RECEIVED ED 1 r ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 33 I P(Ahroia,h' ALi CITY:se 1--�f-I� j VV A-- ZIP. 46 jo 2, IS THE SITE SENSITIVE AREAATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY TE PHONE NUMBER: (Z1.1) 3)-ir— -'-770 K 2( c - LEGAL DESC . ON OF PROPERTY (Attach sep sheet if necessary) (,o+s I Ge i, 11 1 (I[v c,k- ;3 1 S`'r t /s ?(✓Sf 4 o(d.c+i o1--h 4D wh n f- eP/rjr,,, accorSul 4 ) f�-k In vk(U�ey q De+ke Nkts ( ? Sc- (S) nJ • t°v� a � 54.11C �o�.1� tof (CQ Gc�ru•e '�'p�lnc fi� -cr.( ems-, a(1c 1 ar'Q gm o' p ((G u3,� 4 r r�6 5-e s- b�( Ltexidsi(,e Coy- u� (...mac-w '74b c(`7b34-S" P B (o-fs l -4-(�ro�� Q 21 Ir) 1 s v-L Vl0t Srn I1 rs ' re,f Arr,�� . �, l -V ,GIv s,- 0-i) -e- � tt A c ✓to."6 f _ Ptw 1 --L.4.^' t.o - I I C�C t�I/ (n ilk)IL(✓��i' A.0 TYPE' F APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ — REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _ TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ V TE PLAN APPROVAL $ /O,C',QO _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ _ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION _ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charge '/ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 500,00 REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) 2 1.1(e. L(LZd4•declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and ans4v�ls herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. C/k4/ ( c `7) ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and t(� C6(//,,bO�O for the S to of 14/4 residing at (N a of Owner/Repres tive) 19�� , on the jl4h day of 7 7 T 10 (y. a rk 4 caner e es at! 1'n.- tei /I (Signature of Notary Public) (This section to be completed by City Staff.) City File Number: CV %/V 7 - C! A AAD BSP CAP-S CAP-U CPA CU-A CU-H ECF,% LLA MHP FPUD FP'PP R -,RVMP -ADSA-H SHPL-A SHPL-H SP SM SME TP V-A, V-B V-H W TOTAL FEES: $/ r _ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ I?S'f { i`t`•x . ,s,9 MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 L_U A "IV —0`1 0 - CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT r',.,.,.„..„..!.....„..'.......i...„..i•....i'...,..il....„........."....„............„.i......ii.............„...."...;......:.......„..i....l.........:il....„...........,.....„.........i... MASTER APPLICATION ... ,•.,:..,,. PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: ff there is more than one legal,owner�please attach an additional notarized Master Apfilication for each ownn+er. I' y. ' PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Ar�/�(�-r t �( NAME: P�tll f 1 001es inn- - / Crt`C OF �"NI"' �U({' Il, �j(,(,,yil,ctt / AK mtv-5 etn,,t/0 6,s,,5 f c _ —' `OCR PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: ��(.0 �l t f 11�V>1Ct�� \J�- _)c6"i-ktIC-j Vv{A gcs1{�� �`�q �j�C� A CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 1 - 130 — G3 ) C —°Cc' TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 0.00 3 ?Is-3' 770 APPLICANT;,(if other than owner) ?G,''" `''S to t PROPOSED LAND USES:NAME: I c n �c-v`f G�b1�"� � � W CC COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: G D ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): '1\-1//4 CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: • / GI? C.CA/,k.r at A) ±vU-)k- TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON NI DEVELOPMENT PLP,t. -,: (.1' SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): CITY OF RENTON NAME: ( La CG' at)/1 (se. t30(X( S mast— JUN 1999 COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: RECE /E PGA (L(, "i,Orif,,Sir)( � 4-5 / 7 ) 000 ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Al ' --.'' -33 i Le. -F(A11 rola', -r__, --- No CITY: ZIP: /�r e " (,pZ j A--i V 4/ 4 S lo? IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY `!L SENSITIVE AREA? TE PHONE NUMBER: 110 .LEGAL L, CRIPTION OF PROPERTY:;(Attach separate::sheet;.if necessary) `: . • • • ....TYPE OP APPLICATION &.-FEES Check a11.application types.that.apply. City staff will determine:f ees _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ —TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ — GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ FINAL _ WETLAND PERMIT $ — — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ — REVISION $ AFFIDAVIT; OF•OWNERSHIP 1 I, (Print Name) Sae 1077 , declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this applicatior�the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers hereir contained and the inform tion herewith submittedte are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. mi ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and c-GS/914 A/ 5?/ 1 for the State of residing at (Name f Owner/Representa ive) on the day of i9 t gnature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Notary Public) (This ection:to be completed by City Staff 1 City File Number A :•AAD BSP :CAPS CAP U ...CPA CU A....CU H . .ECF .LLA .:. MHP. FPUD. ::FP PP:R ;RVMP . SA A SSA H ';SHPL=A .SHPLH :SP ;:SM 'SME TP, V.A V B VH W TOTAL'FEES $ TOTAL`POSTAGE PROVIDED $ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 41111 IA Ma Imodal% DALLY HOMES INCORPOR ATE D ■ "Exceptional Qua6ry-Tuneless Value" June 11, 1999 Project: 4th and Burnett Address:339 Burnett Avenue South,Renton Construction Mitigation Description Construction on this project will start as soon as a building permit is issued by the City of Renton. This is anticipated to be October of 1999. Duration of the construction will be approximately 12 months. Construction hours are typically 7:00am to 7:00pm Monday through Saturday. Hauling routes will be approved by the City of Renton. Given the proximity of I405, hauling on City streets will be minimal. Water trucks will be available in case of dust. Mud and water will be handled through an approved erosion control plan. Measures to handle noise and other noxious characteristics will be typical of this type of construction. There are no special hours designated for hauling at this time but any, they will comply with the City of Renton requirements. Parking will be provided on site, or an agreement will be made with a neighboring parking lot. DEVELOPMENT P OF REN pN J;/JG JUN 11 1999 RECE,VEp 3316 FUHRMAN AVE.E. • SUITE 100 • SEATTLE,WA 98102 • (206)328-3770 • FAX 328-6909 • #DALLYHI120L7 �4r� recycled paper CITY OF RENTON ' DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site's Should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. -1_01:5; � Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if stfi, v 2. Name of applicant: (k. time/kit/I, /'OY' 3. Address and_phorle n mbef of applicant and contact person: ( airt( bt VPiD2 D3I I�vY►a,r 6'11 . fa 'W I c° S (o) ?s- 3"7-70 - 4. e checklist prepared: icifq(1 5. Agency requesting checklist: I /4/), �,,..� � 1 c(Acki(Ce/J) 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): (, )r+- • a 1() I ( ( `7 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 50t c?-k- t- 'hover 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. f(koSiftt.(tool Po'r)14/ fr9p � 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. ki2 zo(t,e, (AAA(royvvi(A,( v13 [Ot kir/9/0)(04/4U, , 6) 3420 - fops/do- -17) bo/ua ����°z WI 6-8 ury ) o o o s 1,1( 4-L00 sI 5 corn e4(6,(AL 61a (.e-- 2 Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. F7ux-v.),e;t-t e//y kljrle\ )kA) COnniiif (*) 4-1/‘ rr►k E Icrt< I (r - , l ) egloa - 33 Srn ifkkri Fl s t- A(fig, B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. - Cam tll Pa vet �' � re orb 1r�t r C-,� 5rI fin, I,c d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. ti ,3( d�� w 4 (( re‘S ArcC) c r( c,s e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. A�er0 tinw y 3 ` x Cat/LfI c f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. q canS tC11C �\'`, r g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? q c % ‹a-se, Gar rt'rt4(l too a, I m p ei-V t 0t c.a� h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: jc �PI 3 Environmental Checklist 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. p« e --",�i> r 0 4- C o-ylv1-'(,t b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 1 pi ckx mitt 1(4(A, 11 Coil ch' 0'1 oak, 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. N 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,r and approximate quantities if known. h �ir l 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. NC 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 4 • Environmental Checklist b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. gi e YC4 utl o v 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ft,k_ 0/) „, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: jya�l p I - pi cAA Cctyut 4. PLANTS 01 a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other p / + evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other l' shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ViCt- c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (IA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: - Environmental Checklist 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other 1� Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other i f b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. f 1 . C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. CAA- lie pa- b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other prpposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: t 6i1 C1n5-rr4 vh ok 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. aiN 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Ct c6v ° -'k't5 9 y -tY (ifil°\ 6 Environmental Checklist b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? kfil4 t' )1Yr,t( I'l. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.i Cif 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: i picek, t CdvicefYvc/1hoh 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? uff r' j urki ki Io --Ad, G n7 f D CurirCLyj ' iAi - fi6 t-C4 Arrfili acids c aefV b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so"describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Nity Twilkovi" f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 7 Environmental Checklist j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 140RJC— I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:, //1/1frA 0eARItOrrYVAX 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. t kit Cavie 51 Uri as b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. J O kt c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: l ( `1 v � ti 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exteriorbuilding material(s) proposed. 45-1 S ) S- 'w) VIyl ) come. roof(aj b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? (11 ky«w✓t c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:att M t el 004/Vr‘' 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? IV' mlietvrkkrt bf,6 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 1�1D 8 • Environmental Checklist c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? (404 00 IA 0 0 11,G���, V kin-w , b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. (itykii41/0 h c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NJ/pc 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site_plans, if any. 4+k , ''rw'�C ) U C , ` OW 01 tbletirk b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? I k)Ivc c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? frpo 7& . ' 0 Environmental Checklist d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. ri (u I bit t. - Ar ,grIAA rkLei f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. fteil 4()—(. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: el ctncity, nat raLgas, Water, refuse service, tel hope, sanit sever, septic system, o r. f b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on th( 'site or in the immediate vicinity w hich might be needed. eec hit ) W a T'�,��rLo�Ztl1e, S UICL) 1-c-119 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there •e any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: DaN �IJ� // I Name Printed: rjAar (`i LA, (90 Date: ( 41 qi 10 Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? -1(ir((AA' irty Proposed measures to avoid or reduce silch increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? kbb it CC Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? p b(uirt (a rtttJ Orotliocli 4-r A,rest-y-f-lik Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 11 Environmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? (kk 411r�, (4V v7t fy w -7( Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that. it „ ight issue in reliance upo this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentati n,o/�willful ack of full disci sure my part, Proponent: 1� tit Name Printed: /`— G/ Date: ENVCHLST.DOC REVISED 6/98 12 i o en�on DENSITY WORKSHE E T 1. Gross area property: 1. 0151 33C square feet 2. Certain areas are excluded from the calculation. These include public roadways and sensitive areas*. Total excluded area: 2. square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area (or total of lot areas): 3. square feet 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. SFS acres 5. Number of dwelling units (d.u.) planned: 5. units 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. (00 d.u./acre JA k 7,� lots would result in a net density of ICJ dwelling units per acre. * Sensitive areas are defined as "areas not suitable for development which are included within the City's greenbelt, geologically hazardous, wetlands, or flood plain regulations." Lpp;,r,ENT PL_' (City Code Section 4-31-2: Definitions CITY OF REN J1,I 1 RECD V'ED DENSITY.DOC 6-09-1999 6:09AM FROMCLE_ENGR 4254627597 a P. 2 :i 1: �4 iT-A. r ift 11100 NE 8th Street. Suite 355 Bellevue,WA 98004 Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. (425)462-7663 (425)462-7597 Fax PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE REPORT Burnett Mixed Use Project 4th and Burnett Renton, Washington Prepared For: Daily Homes, Inc: 3316 Fuhrman Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98102 206-328-3770 J Prepared By: tkl pv-�; Pinnacle Engineering Ind 4�G‘-C(0 1qpo00 11100 NE 8t Street,Suite 355 1 �. Bellevue, WA 98004 PI' ` o 425-462-7663 G�� ' June 9, 1999 Avs- WAS .Ce /3/ jI �S,tw���Gti- /7 l EXPIRES 10/19/5Cj I "Strivingfor the Peak of Excellence" II M June 8, 1999 David Johnson D.B. Johnson Construction, Inc. 1801 Grove Street#B Marysville,WA 98270 Dear David: Attached is an information flyer on Strawberry Hills Phase III. We want to make sure you aware that final plat approval is in July 1999. We are very motivated to sell these 15 lots. Please call me if you would like additional information at (206) 328-3770 extension 201. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Christie J. Nevetral Sales and Marketing Coordinator CJN/mss Enclosure 6-09-1999 6: 10AM FROMIII,CLE_ENGR 4254627597 P. 3 Existing Conditions The site is located at the SE corner of the Burnett Avenue South/4th Street intersection. It is currently paved and serves as public parking. The pavement slopes westerly approximately 2- 4%towards a concrete curb and gutter along the west side of a one-way alley. Proposed Use The site will be developed as a residential/commercial project with 2 levels of underground parking. Proposed utility services (sewer, water, electricity, etc.) will be served by existing services. Erosion Control The existing pavement will be removed for the proposed structure. The existing storm sewer conveyance system adjacent to the site will be protected from silt-laden runoff. Surrounding streets will be keep clean from dirt and debris. Drainage Runoff currently sheetflows westerly across the pavement to the concrete curb and gutter along the one-way alley, then drains into existing catchbasins. Runoff from the proposed structure will be collected and conveyed underground to the existing storm sewer conveyance system. As the site is currently paved, no net increase in runoff is anticipated. The existing downstream drainage system should be adequate, as the volume of runoff will not be increased. Water quality might actually improve since the existing asphalt pavement will be replaced by rooftop. "Striving for the Peak of Excellence" III Se June 8, 1999 Donovan Steenberg Donovan Homes 7610 77th Place NE Marysville,WA 98270 Dear Donovan: Attached is an information flyer on Strawberry Hills Phase III. We want to make sure you aware that final plat approval is in July 1999. We are very motivated to sell these 15 lots. Please call me if you would like additional information at(206) 328-3770 extension 201. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Christie J. Nevetral Sales and Marketing Coordinator CJN/mss Enclosure 6-09-1999 6: 11AM FROCLE_ENGR 4254627597 P. 4 1ali—V4-1777 Utl•4G t-KUII WM Homes Inc IU bleb?/ P.04 ram^ 17 J Smithers vS u) • i 1 ci) c.-÷. 11.11 c....0 - ;-...1 g r 57 Ell cio , 1 orb. fro Pere) III CD Burnett Ave S q" • \._ est v 0 _ amo N iO to i 41 Berne ' 0 OD June 8, 1999 Donna Green Jensen Green Construction 14612 SE 14th Bellevue,WA 98007 Dear Donna: Attached is an information flyer on Strawberry Hills Phase III. We want to make sure you aware that final plat approval is in July 1999. We are very motivated to sell these 15 lots. Please call me if you would like additional information at(206) 328-3770 extension 201. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Christie J. Nevetral Sales and Marketing Coordinator CJN/mss Enclosure 6-09-1999 6: 11AM =ROM ACLE_ENGR 4254627597 P. 5 3-+tt-04-L'y J 1411:i:4.S i-kUM NRIr Homes Inc TO c 4627597 P.O5 01i24 $H WED 10:27 FAX 423235251] ,RE`tiTON-FINANCE 001 • / 4� t o°D • . . . s io eii, aye" • `0 . . r OP br gati . : . * . ' ,.,- • — • k 4 - 4 - • 0 • - 44 _ , . • • . rzo . i . ty.ssi . ' - . .(17 k 3 46 24 d3 r p . ‘ • . . : . ..- � a . 8 . 8 9 O �0 1 - , - - > ‘4 t 4.. 1(1 ‘1, Opp � _ 4 � ♦ � 9 fr819 , S�58Q Wg . a > „� .,! 4 + 0 .�� . �. • �. 44 8 2 / • ` 0s i 0 �� •+ 0 00 b t II" C.' 7 tA UJ /2 40oe, 4 p Q '1 C�: / 3 49° . 4 1 i'�� 00 h 8 0? o / 800 VIOO $ N. a 10aO 4' 03(4 ri) 1011211.91111.1... A' - 1ti; • ca N ti� i 'r 1 /40ttrc 14s 1� 0 ,.z - I TOTAL P.05 • June 8, 1999 Larry Kiel, Jr. KLP Inc. 524 132nd Street SW#A101 Everett,WA 98204 Dear Larry: Attached is an information flyer on Strawberry Hills Phase III. We want to make sure you aware that final plat approval is in July 1999. We are very motivated to sell these 15 lots. Please call me if you would like additional information at(206) 328-3770 extension 201. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Christie J. Nevetral Sales and Marketing Coordinator CJN/mss Enclosure • .' • •'"."-- ------- --;04'\ • \''s'it';', i • .0,,:‘, „ , ,,,--: \ itt \- .• , - , .,.. , ,-...‘ , i , 1 liw , '11. , \ .4 , I 15-i\ ____.-ka . \ , —,... 3. 'NI ,iti 1 t — ., ihini t::. impti 1 ! 1- - -.-------4114,- _,!____ _Mk it....-i..V.`,.10.._.1._._...i. . . it mi.. lir ,:\ \ 1 , . , .- • __t___.. , , , ,. ,.w..„ ``\` ;� � 6 it I ± I '• lit....__-... .--_-_-::,-::1 r �i� -Li,, • ,.. . ,, . . . . ,, , ,,, _....._____ , p . MU • i r i - --- ---- I i 1 . I 1 • I I I 1 Ili rt, i 'L . ' _ i cr I I r; '•• i ` ' i E 1 • 3 1If' AR1 • 1111 wa. moo BURNETT MIXED USE I 41.d •Y96;Os+ p 91O31IH321 VH 8041OHl Hd •Z*a• 66-et-mom b4 9 'd L69LZ9VSZV 2I`JN3-310 N0 NVZ L :9 6661-60-9 S June 8, 1999 James Matteson Matteson Construction 15418 29th Avenue SE Mill Creek,WA 98012 Dear James: Attached is an information flyer on Strawberry Hills Phase III. We want to make sure you aware that final plat approval is in July 1999. We are very motivated to sell these 15 lots. Please call me if you would like additional information at(206) 328-3770 extension 201. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Christie J. Nevetral Sales and Marketing Coordinator CJN/mss Enclosure 6-09-1999 6: 13AM 7ROM_ACLE_ENGR 4254627597ell P• 7 J Novo film.l.Cs►5, ...I � ,�....,. �7�t4 te'rdet.ua ac.va...,.w.,...c 1ti r.a t ArrNrV 0.4 ' SVMvr� pVttri.v} 4.._____},,,, ,17 0, 1 1 , ,_, _._ t... , ,q1, Ni.„ , , -is. - _. It (7 , • fi 1 ti.. , •g-- Crp, iln, ••-ift 1 - iii k Crt44....) CL 4 — I t I 0. pti e [ o . Lu i . k' 'N.\ i )... .... , i , , k i co i .41a. 4 A___, 1 i ir41A 1 1 L ► 1 1 a 0 w 1 k i 1 ' 4 I . lil� .. —so _ . 2 4 1 a a p" t . 5t s1 F a June 8, 1999 Jeff Riggs Riggs Construction P. O. Box 12609 Mill Creek, WA 98082 Dear Jeff: Attached is an information flyer on Strawberry Hills Phase III. We want to make sure you aware that final plat approval is in July 1999. We are very motivated to sell these 15 lots. Please call me if you would like additional information at(206) 328-3770 extension 201. Sincerely, DALLY HOMES, INC. Christie J. Nevetral Sales and Marketing Coordinator CJN/mss Enclosure ..,_,.....__,(.. . .,... r..... 0\,. ° IjY '13i1A111A t114a.. ..* 1 ,' /1 .' t-i:1 ,%4,,: 2 *. 0 I iiiinime) i Unbent I VI, 1!%%;% .ls;N F.,z3, tc)\- • .,\.. • I. ,. 1'4 • . -1.- ,. It illoppa.mannwr.,:(-.. ; co,.. 4i- t I9� s !`t� 1 ►!'I N T !i ®•�. .N. �" ,... 1:4:-"L'. • • Qom' I -V=_ ,,,t-"-•"iI D il Y ��_ ••'axATTvex AVE P. �' ..».... ° aClililt M\.. .- .ee•• fxATivn ArlZd" t Y �l .._ -.-..» k1 smil I' Diaril �� �,..�. 111r!! ! $!! '�p= 8�9'.�©dl�!■�11� ■:Il ■II!JI!1 i■ �MOWS� i U + --- _ g ii = eCO, « r.rwaTx AWL P. w r _ t r ImfofrM fvc • Y Y : Y 3= V ,4fA, P17 Iv,:.,,.=\t.1 -v :,.w...‘,.; :\ .:;.1, ..., iv I= _ii— kruseon- y t t- ...., NC k. �'!� J h f 5 van 1111131 1 1 ,, z ,. ,. ,. , . ‘ 7.,„. * I ,k, 1,0 i Nom i A, i iiiii .i 7. : '-'.�- L MOMS 'ME S. L -' ♦ • -,t �.>i •lii- t SM HE4 AHI ADD = ta:51 ��.�r :.��.1\� �.k,3.\,e�3, gV-t, .�, ,ta aF�' �e ��' sIA ' a. P. ��Va/s as r �ila�' �''3n:' ui_ ;•U I 1 I4. l9R i 1Y���yI� �' s�,,11 ' s \�! Y sibia ru Ln�'tr.uT: I•s•ItV t. . �Z 1 t_i i6A`LY� : ` st - Lcnff..cc.. F rY SMIMW AK rf. $/I/'J.. E •i ,ig hi • {{cc���Y111IIIIIIIIII Y tw =^;# ' !'iT»S=f Y t Y 0��� C rii° i �,.7 ,` .7 R ,r �+. W. �� I` i et w Mt ^ Y LOYM MI[. s a I . AVE.+�I t tz 3 —•. _ ; N,.. N. \ Km., \tYti . •� fi �����ill . w • • ro « .�;� "�' eat �o +�O a �+. s t. ,. �.• ..m^ (7�w— L w I .. `• -i4 G f''we I• •� I.W.% t %7 . © a®r a i i �g ' i Q .`4. 1 ii Ca,a V �. 6�` 11"L M.r. nwr. t f `f• a.I.a s;+ �s 0,•.. t" . °h::.e, \ A,t� ',. .. NNIV 3 T .."' + F r ; .i �. e ` l I I L •i A .., i t Q x .. ••.. + AM•. .4`...p•-` ` I w� • \ vs,'L'. ' - - _.• r t IlIIIfY Jai AJSA ....» ,.....A...,_...- L , `-i�' t t onm.VOL./in-TO t - ����-<{" ♦ t \ I=� ...._.._ ............. � "+•e «I<• � 'a.w, ow re _„I+ .... T a UN METT�.AvcM f' `I. - - aualr7T AYf•.. e. i f 723160 'i i+.. ,.•. . `i Vim.3 I ;. a. � \.:��` �� : 'INVER.NEI NI • ^leillitir . tat iiiimilit . glizpirisii!: ix• 1 + i,Y.,� .. `l• ® �•1 Lti.� �r�.G-- � wl, �_ � +� i amo>mva..n.,ma�. •, !y 'G �°��. i� �. 1 -- \ ` �, . a 4, c• -. . ,'=.a ilk L• iI�C k orm !mC.''1` .:iif�1 aru-.,�� oat.to g �I l f, ii et. . ... L.I sw ss eM�s «I r. 3n j4I E. _ R�fe 3 $ NON \ • _ �`.�i� taiO_ 'a '`, �.y t •. r.-•<r It; w •t _ T MLLijj f - , r • o a` - e E .�,.`ia\�`.Zi�Z ;��•��Tei rt „I} •mob ,.a t � .m: ` . ria„4,-Ii'• rti - • •.. �h�•-as iz ` ; `` . 'S° ' 1 �� ��� -^p 'r �� 47 . �`'•��1�S o-\ c °• v' V. �'a �- O , - .IRr. .. ,a , . .. � ��•e a IS� ����ni Y _ WELL= AVE. ��• 5. _ / i 1N I/13a d x Its (?'A WWa YI[ut Ava. a 0.F = a RE TON _M �zs!So r r2oo .vE. .wiiát IQ plE ill�fF�ti lil `��11 '.:®' .! .I •;+t ( 1'�. m o •• �:�. ..r. .... "� •1' tom• e MAix AVE. F = G ; �5! » S R.405;(tea wly:� .Y { i �y. ,.,� a a ``` I � iT ; ter :Y: F ..:...«.� - .. I t ° ..a 11. M5T•M m.ct .aw_M6'{ ��toIt 1. ® i7, , ul!' \Jto i I i_. : �r 25A F K M l � ,.._- . � - ^ EtD / May 05 99 07: 29a (4251 ,-8551 p. 2 GEOTECH May5, 1999 CONSULTANTS, INC_ 13256 NE 20th Stri i,Suite I() JN 99151 licllcvuc.WA 9R(105 (42.5)747 5f,)x FAX(425)747-8561 Daily Homes Inc. 2216 Fuhrman Avenue East, Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98102 Attention: Charlie Laboda Subject. Transmittal Letter-Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Mixed-Use Building Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street Renton, Washington Dear Mr, Laboda: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the mixed use building to be constructed in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P-4891, dated April 9, 1999. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with five test borings that • encountered approximately 8 feet of fill overlying loose alluvial deposits consisting of silt, sand and gravel. Dense, gravelly sands were revealed at depths of 25 to 35 feet. The proposed building should be supported on concrete augercast piers to prevent excessive post-construction settlement. The lowest floor could be constructed on-grade if it is reinforced with steel bars, and if some noticeable settlement relative to the foundations is acceptable. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phosos of this projcct. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate DBG/MRM: mrm Of,-,E--eTpt-� ``r CITY OF f"►`�G' May 05 99 07: 29a (4251 '-8561 p. 3 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Mixed-Use Building Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street Renton, Washington This report presents our geotechnical findings and recommendations for mixed-use building to be constructed on the northwest corner of Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. We were provided with a site plan that showed the property dimensions and the outline of the proposed building. Additionally, building cross-sections were provided. Based on this information, we anticipate that the structure will consist of two residential towers containing three floors of living units, over two common floors that will contain parking garages and some commercial space. The lower two floors will cover most of the site. We anticipate that the floor elevation for the lowest level will be near the existing grade. A landscaped courtyard is to be situated between the two residential towers. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The nearly rectangular property is covered with asphalt and is generally flat. Currently, the site is • being used as a parking lot. The property has approximately 200 feet of frontage on Burnett Avenue South and about 120 feet of frontage on South 4th Street, An unnamed, paved alley adjoins the west property line. Vertical steel elements cut off at grade and encased in concrete are visible in the pavement surface These appear in a regular pattern throughout much of the lot. Research for the Phase I Environmental Assessment that we have completed for the property indicates that the site has been developed in the past. The steel supports that are visible appear to have resulted from a canopy that was present along Burnett Avenue South for use by a car dealership. Prior to this, the site was developed with a variety of structures, including a residence, a sales office for a car dealership, a restaurant, and a lodging house. The oldest structure that was documented on the site was a one-story residence that dates back to 1$96. Our research revealed that the structures were demolished or removed by 1963, with the canopy being erected in the following year. From the available records it is not known if all of the debris resulting from the past demolition were removed. The Century 321 Building, an existing 4-story brick office building, abuts the north property line. The plans on file at the City of Renton indicate that this building is supported on widened conventional footings. However, we were informed that piles may have been installed for the foundations. We observed no signs of cracking in the building's brick exterior to indicate that excessive foundation settlement may have occurred. Single-family houses occupy the properties across the alley to the west. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Mai 05 99 07: 29a 14251 -8561 p. 4 • Daily Horner inc. .IN 99151 May 5, 1999 Page 2 SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling five test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The borings were drilled on April 15, 1999, using a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 7. The test borings encountered 8 to 9 feet of generally loose fill that varied In composition from silt, to silty sand, to gravelly sand amongst the borings. Beneath the fill were loose soils consisting of sands and silts. These soils appear to be alluvial deposits that have been placed by rivers and streams that have meandered through the Renton Valley following the recession of the last glaciers. The Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle confirms that the near-surface soils have been modified by past grading activities throughout much of the downtown area. At a depth of 25 to 35 feet, the five borings found dense sands and gravelly sands. The soil conditions encountered in the borings were consistent with those found in previous borings completed for Daily Homes on the site located two blocks to the northwest, in the 200 block of Logan Avenue South. No significant debris or rubble was encountered in the borings. Concrete was not revealed below • the asphalt pavement. However, none of the borings were drilled through the concrete that is currently visible at the surface. Sample 1 (5-foot depth) in Boring 5 did contain a small piece of paper. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations, The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. If a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 14 to 1/ feet. The test borings were left open for only a short time period, Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not exactly ndicate the static groundwater level. However, it is likely that the seepage encountered in the borings represents the regional groundwater table that underlies the Renton Valley, It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors, The borings were completed following an unusually wet winter. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. May 05 38 07: 30a 14251 -8581 p. 5 Dolly Homo:, inc. JN 99151 May 5, 1999 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on the results of the test borings and the observations made during our site visit, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The loose fill and alluvial deposits that underlie the site should not he used to support the proposed structure, as excessive post-construction settlement would result. Deep foundations consisting of augercast concrete piers appear to be the most appropriate method of support, considering the size of the planned building, the presence of nearby structures, and the soil and groundwater conditions that underlie the site. The piers would extend through the fill and loose soils, into the underlying, dense sands and gravels. The lowest floor may be constructed on-grade, provided some settlement and slab cracking is acceptable. The potential for large cracks or downsets in on-grade slabs can be reduced by reinforcing them with rebar. This is discussed later in SLABS-ON-GRADE, Where interior and exterior slabs lead up to doorways, they should be doweled into the grade beam. This reduces the potential fora downset at the threshold, allowing the slab to "ramp" slightly as it settles relative to the foundations. Slabs should be supported on the piers where slab settlement is not acceptable. There 13 some uncertainty regarding the type of foundation supporting the existing brick building to the north. Although we do not anticipate any substantial below-grade excavation for this project, we wish to point out that if excavation adjacent to the existing building is to extend below that building's footing, it will be necessary to underpin the foundation. We can provide recom- mendations for underpinning should this become necessary. Due to the presence of conventionally-supported buildings in the vicinity, it will be important to minimize ground vibrations during the earthwork and foundation construction. The augercast pier installation should result in no perceptible vibrations, The use of large compactors, such as vibratory roller or hoepacks, should be avoided on the site. Jumping jack compactors should be utilized to compact structural fill, or a self-levelling structural fill, such as control density fill, should be used. Asphalt and any encountered concrete debris should not be broken rip near the north and west property boundaries, as this is typically accomplished by dropping the material or by striking it with the bucket of the excavator. Prior to starting site work, it would be prudent to document the condition of the nearby buildings using photographs or videotapes. This establishes the extent of any pre-existing settlement damage. During construction, benchmarks placed on the adjacent structures should be monitored for settlement. These measures are typical recommendations tor construction projects in older developed areas, and are intended to protect against unsubstantiated damage claims from surrounding property owners. The consistency of the near-surface soils varies. Generally, the silty soils will not be suitable for reuse as fill beneath on-grade elements, such as in utility trenches. These soils cannot be adequately compacted to prevent post-construction settlement. The gravelly sand could be reused as structural fill, if it is compacted in accordance with the recommendations presented in GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL. The silty soils will also be susceptible to disturbance from foot and equipment traffic when they arc wet. This disturbance and softening can be limited by placing a layer of crushed rock or concrete over the subgrade. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plants to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC, Ma9 05 99 07: 30a 14251 '-8551 p. 6 Daily Hurries Inc. JN 99151 May 5, 1999 Page 4 review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process, AUGERCAST CONCRETE PIERS Augercast piers are installed using continuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated subsurface conditions, An allowable compressive capacity of 50 tons can be attained by installing a 16-inch-diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into dense strata. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. Based on our test boring information, we estimate that pier lengths of about 35 to 45 feet below the existing ground surface will be required to achieve adequate penetration into the hearing soil. We estimate that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live- loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structure should be less than about one-quarter inch. We recommend reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage extending a portion of the pier's length with a full-length center bar. Each pier can be assumed to have a point of fixity at 10 feet below the ground surface for the computation of lateral load resistance. The loose soil against the piers can be assumed to have a design passive earth resistance of 150 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting on two times the pier diameter. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams will also provide some lateral resistance. If structural fill is placed against the outside of the grade beams, the design passive earth pressure from the fill can be assumed to be equal to that pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid with a density of 200 pcf. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No, 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by Soil Profile Type SD (Stiff Soil). The loose soils that lie beneath the water table have a moderate potential for seismic liquefaction in the event of a large earthquake. By using deep foundations, the risk of catastrophic foundation settlement resulting from seismic liquefaction will be adequately mitigated. SLABS-ON-GRADE The parking level floor may be constructed as slab-on-grade atop the existing fill, provided some settlement and cracking can be tolerated. As a minimum, the slab should be reinforced with a gridwork of rebar in order to reduce the risk of differential settlement and cracking. Typically, No, 4 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. May 05 SS 07: 30a (42517 -8561 p. 7 Deify Homes Inc. JN g9151 May 5, 1999 Page 5 rebar running both directions at 18 inches on-center is adequate. Where cracking and differential settlement may not be acceptable, such as in the retail or living spaces, a structural slab should be constructed supported on the deep foundations. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill, All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed later in PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS. In areas whore the passage of moisture through the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand should be used in the fine- grading process to reduce damage to the vapor barrier, to provide uniform support under the slab, and to reduce shrinkage cracking by improving the concrete curing process. Isolation joints should be provided where the slabs intersect columns and walls. Control and expansion joints should also be used to control cracking from expansion and contraction. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Rotaining walls backfllled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain `f he following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Active Earth Pressure* 40 pcf Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where: (i) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (ii) active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. •For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height,a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure, The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should he utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners in the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. May 05 99 07: 31a [4251 /-8581 p. 8 Daily Homes Inc. JN 09151 May 5, 1999 Page 6 Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively Impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The sub-section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES Excavation slopes must not undermine existing structures and utilities, and should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, away from property lines and existing structures, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil type at the subject site would be classified as Type C. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. The GENERAL section should be referenced for additional considerations related to excavation adjacent to the neighboring north building. The above recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Foundation drains should be installed around the perimeter of the structure and at the base of all earth-retaining wails. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 'I-Inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. May 05 99 07: 32a 14251 7-8551 P. 9 Daily HomAS Inc. JN 99151 May 5, 1999 Page 7 similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 8. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL All building and pavement areas should be stripped of existing asphalt pavement, former foundation elements and slabs, and other deleterious material. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed wide' a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the heed to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction, The following toble presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: •• tt9P y nt • cia ,�pa.141 art Beneath, slabs or 95% i walKways Behind retaining walls 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio,expressed in percentages,of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, es determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78(Modified Proctor). Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered In the test borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. It the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. M, 05 99 07: 32a (4251 7-8561 p. 10 Dully Homes Inc. JN 99151 May 5, 1999 Page 8 observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Daily Homes, Inc. and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents so the contractor may he aware of our findings. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also,job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 -7 Test Boring Logs Plate 8 Footing Drain Detail GEOTECH CONSULTANTS.INC. May 05 99 07: 33a (4251 7-8551 p. 11 Daily Homes Inc. JN 99151 May 5, 1999 Page 9 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • Mci. / c : �/x (I) • '11 27845 4/ • forint.vt1 7� s 9 EXPIRES 1Q/"/99 . Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate DBG/MRM: mrm GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. May 05 99 07: 33a 14251 '-05G1 p. 12 ------------ • .v .Sr.i. .�, ' ,,,..,, c= n c l \ 6TH T V- 1 Is�L: ;. " �•�` ,- �" T., . 4 414 .e S's 7. \':t;ijR ( y_ 01. '•1! 1 I��S v°s�.rrt N :..11-4? 1 /f T,jt.NE• -S` z *�' 'v s 4 i ',r-r1 ..ry 1� 1144 i ;l vT irMIJ. il Jr r. f. - ,*Yy a rl. r �' :f .}r ) �/ `� ,�P .YfNO50R 1 �,.• i! S I J v, n 12ani 5 ST �"'L!Z «v ry rit • ) ` j4TH 54 : T 900/ ,S� 53 •k1ii•' ., t MB f >, rc ..:‘ • •,.. \ lAir 17 'Pe, r jr� , I, •..,,,r� 4tN70s ,, NI `/ � �� '� 40• O d'os � ef7i.�►�4f1..' '•1. w71t? V ���� II =iimmwmrrw..„tip - r AIR';RT wy �_j � . „�;, \1' ��0.. S 132R0too u0 6 s TrLucl .sr '. \ 'J. / ///�/p `■�f�E �`'`fit' .rr4.. T + $ . ' T rtu rb. Ual / R't e r�' 1, e OB1N / ,, aS 4' : S ICT0R1 300 Q • ® 0 , t));os , © ' ri • ' 1 T Sr r18 XfNTQV a r V ¢- y?�a J ; •T: • r`'� ,ST . ,,p�• ti S 3 2�'�D S to® f`P .7l.ZYFA.. �r LI wY • vex •a S i fi.i.a.e. ..Kit: , S 3RD KINVIF:eaPiligr `~7'.t s1�',�:a•.�,n► 169 ,, Jani ap .ter..4 l�l ... 900...E 5 . �A' �' — _ -►�: r NT ,� ,�c ; „4Neilili A ,,,, '..It T1 < lEA I LI. G.kt. , 167...lit,- !Nil if lit 4-yG�Z _i _515 -EN�k.`r. C e ` v w J r'l fNrON VlCIAOC # � AIPFVSIr -y,� I J Sw O� W�� r C[Yr:4 ��� 1Ci�:' Et 1 r r 1�G-'`-^— Ir S R:OH VIII,Afr DL S 1tni ST •co- 1 • RYO MAP L . „iiiessi. ---0- liu:Ik?4," 'il\t 405 ' _. , 6TH I ST ��_______.el- �� � H ,, ti ��y,�} �'�0 6TH S� $ 16rt1 ST4. ZQR E` t��i'�I t / .. w J l 5! � S ,,1. i l6r"CRA 4C9a� lc' ,i�`Ti�► 'N.ti&r f*i :a ; ..., -; stwil ,,,. I 'Burr P ft;A• 1 SV I3r$ ST N �� � yt a�`� w �fP� ,i'�. • ,� �F ,rl S lyl I� ` 19TH Si 4 TyANLt0 ! 'Oft --<r ► {,, S, • f 'Y` f1 �'i� b !J1.ti CrjrtF t •S $., v El: •'. I ".e• cT�� rS 4,',,, t .; [:i'A: I( r 7 OQ P11GET_ s.' v '��y.,if-1 a r Cr ,err c�Xa 7 k� J� (gill, .n�: r ,SW 23AD ST S Z1R0 i ST `r o. ; -1st r_.f r,.� d (J i. uii J �> .p, NJD IlL� st Sk( ^N" 4'ir t r STN.. ;mkt Z. 11 i N kl .• • y /r_-- . S trt.� 11:'SW I12rn dl -Cr '.•• ° \1 27TH ST r; st I eTH SE164TH, S � t—1-« s t 1 • "6 r Q • ✓, 1:500 1;100 I $7,�w r1 ..�v /J 1H,H ft C\ tpr s•. .n , .•i ic;OQS ,, iH $: ti , s V.y35� ' ''„ t -TiI S tsrn * f Y i`''' a '9in ST7-,�tr,r f N,, ]i I ,�etin 3: :f` eo, it 0 r ? • rO .= 1 ♦ , :,!1 Sr • 5k0151 s1 M'Y M1a 29 ' � ~w JJRD Sr r ' ew .m ` `�•• l9t K _- i 'L ISTS15u _ e- VICINITY MAP GE(�TECJI ,� Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Pa[r 99151 May 1999 Mai 05 99 07: 34a 14251 '-13561 p. 13 Century 321 Building • B-1 8.2 I , 1 1 � 1 � C I 1 Cl) B-3 i 4` i I cu �+ I I I I w i i i i 4 I i B-5 B-4 i .-) South 4th Street NORTH aApproximate location of test boring Not To Scale SITE EXPLORATION PLAN GEOTECYI Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street c`.UNsul;:�AN IS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Plate: 89151 May 1999 2 11.ay 05 99 07: 34a (4251 7-8581 p. 14 BORING 1 �e5 `� �,��0 4� 50-fi4 �5G5 Description Asphalt over brown-gray with iron staining, silty, fine SAND to sandy SILT, moist, loose (FILL) r FILL 5 -- 3 1I — 10 — ` 6 2 g Brown SAND with gravel, wet, loose — - i 15— - becomes gray and less gravelly 7 3 -lens of gray silt 20— 13 4 E - becomes silty SP SM — 25— 8 5 , I - gravelly layer — i 30 I— 6 - kill 35--- 33 7 'i i' Gray SAND with silt layers, fine-grained, wet, dense SM ' 11111: o Brown-gray, sandy GRAVEL,wet, dense to very dense GW0 40 — 70/9" 8 `° - o 41.5_ ' Test boring was terminated at 41 feet during drilling on April 15, 1999. " Groundwater seepage was encountered at 14 feet during drilling. Sampler pounded on a rock - blowcount is not representative. BORING LOG GOrrEC Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job: Date: I Logged by: J Plate: 99151 April 1999 DBG 3 May 05 99 07: 35a 14251 '-8561 p. 15 BORING 2 ,419Q `�,� cpo-fi � Description Asphalt over brown, sandy SILT to silty SAND, moist, loose to medium- - ` dense (FILL) FILL 5 - 13 1 10 —• 7 2 I! ML Gray, sandy SILT with some organics, moist, loose r.. 15 13 3 i Gray SAND, fine-to medium-gralned, wet, medium-dense 20 ~ 15 4 - becomes silty SP -ail 25 5 - becomes slightly silty and gravelly 6. 10 6 tit.- — Gray S1I T, wet, loose 35 -- 30 7 ML I -becomes sandy and dense 1111 40--- 65 8 ' :l Gp I. Gray, sandy GRAVEL, wet,very dense 41.5— `—. * Test boring was terminated at 41.5 feet during drilling on April 15, 1999. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 15 feet during drilling. ;' Sampler pounded on a rock - blowcount is not representative. BORING LOG GEOTECI-I Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street CUI�ISU1LT61tv7S,INC. Renton, Washington Job: Date; Logged by: T Plate: 99151 I April 1999 DBG 4 Mai 05 99 07: 36a 1425) -8561 p. 16 �`�t� `o�y�4oa� \� BORING 3 5� ��e�� 41, Sc" 45Gt' Description ,.. Asphalt over brown, sandy GRAVEL, moist to wet (FILL) FILL 5 — 1 10 — i 4 2 ; Gray, sandy SILT, wet, loose r I 15 -- 5 3 ML - becomes sandier with silt lenses 20 — l I 11 4 0 -contains some organics Ii 0 0 0 0 0 • 25 33 5 E' ° ° ° Gray, gravelly SAND, fine-to coarse-grained, wet, dense " "0 0" 0 0 0 0 30 50/6" 6 I I' c, _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 ° ° 0 0 35 " " " 78 7 go ° 0 0 SM 40 ML 25 8 I Gray, silty SAND,wet, medium-dense 41.5_-._, ; Test boring was terminated at 41.6 feet during drilling on April 15, 1998. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 17 feet during drilling. ,`• Sampler pounded on a rock: blowcount is not representative. BORING LOG GEOTE' CFIBurnett Avenue South and South 4th Street }{` CONSULTANTS,)INC_ Renton, Washington Job: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99151 April1999 OBG 5 May 05 33 07: 36a (4251 -8561 p. 17 t e ° BORING 4 �e ,V�b\0,9 ,42;c 45G� Description Asphalt over brown, silty, gravelly SAND, moist, loose (FILL) 5 FILL 7 1 � 10 - _ 4 2 Ii . M—L Gray SILT with some organics, low plasticity, wet, loose ll III 15 5 3 [ 1: '; Gray SAND, fine-to medium-grained with silt layers, wet, loose 20 17 4 Ili; • i 25 — ... 14 5 • SM - becomes dense 45 6 . .i 1 is I: : r � 35— 90/11" 7 1, ... 40 _ 30 8 g, ::�.:' 41.5 r_ :� ;I:. . * Test boring was terminated et 41.5 feet during drilling on April 15, 1999. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 17 feet during drilling. BORING LOG GEOTECH Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington 9 _ �,_ __ Job: Date: Logged by: Plate: ��r^ 99151 April 1999 080 6 Mau C5 99 07: 36a (4251i -8561 p. 18 • i 5 00� BORING 5 • N1•1 'Ve' �,�ab yak \$ Description Asphalt over brown, silty SAND, fine-grained, moist, loose (FILL) 5 — FILL 4 1 � 10 - 4 2 g Gray SILT with sand and some organics, wet, loose 15— I 5 3 1' -becomes sandier j MI_ 20- 10 4 El, 25 45 5 • • • • • _ 0 • 0 30 — 54 6 t o •. 6. • Brown-gray, sandy GRAVEL,wet, very dense ... •• • • • • • • GW ° 35— 77110" 7 I • .° : • • • 0 • • • • • 0 • • • ••• 0 0 0 is • • 0 • • • • • 40..— 84 8 ' : : -becomes sandier 41.5— * Test boring was terminated at 41 feet during drilling on April 15, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 15 feet during drilling. BORING LOG . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Burnett Avenue South and South 4th Street Renton, Washington Job: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99151 April 1999 D8G 7 May 05 33 07: 36a (4251 —8 5 6 1 p. 13 Important Information Abo ut Your • • • --Geotechnical Engineering Report. Subsurface problems am a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. .. The following Information is provided.to help you manage your risks. Geotechnical Services Are Performed for • elevation,configuration, location, orientation, or Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the spe- • project ownership. cific needs of their clients.A geotechnical engineering study con- ducted for a civil engineer may not fun the needs of a construe- Asa general rule, always Inform your geotechnical engineer ton contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geot- of project changes—even minor ones—and request an ethnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engi- assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot nearing report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Na ono accept responsrr1Uty or 'homy for problems mat occur except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report because their reports do not consider developments of which without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who pre they were not informed. pared it. And no one—not oven you—should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A Geotechnical Engineering Report la Based on A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a A Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique,project-spe- been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, cific factors when establishing the scope of a study.Typical factors such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural include:the client's goals,objectives,and risk management pref- events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua• erences;the general nature of the structure involved, its size,and tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before apply- configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other Ing the report to determine If it is still reliable.A minor amount planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates other- Most Geotechnical Findings Are wise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was; • not prepared for you, Professional Opinions • not prepared for your project, Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those • not prepared for the specific site explored, or points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are • completed before important project changes were made. taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sub- geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: surface conditions may differ—sometimes significantly—from • the function of the proposed structure,as when those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engi- It's changed from a parking garage to an office neer who developed your report to provide construction obser• building, or from a light industrial plant to a vation is the most effective method of managing the risks asso- refrigerated warehouse, dated with unanticipated conditions. Ma905 99 07: 37a 14251 —8561 p. 20 A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the Do not nvPrn iy nn tits r nngtrl lrtion recommendations included geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recorn- conference can also be valuable.Be sure contractors have suffi- mendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions cient time to perform additional study.Only then might you be in revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who a position to give contractors the best information available to developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for you,while requiring them to at least share some of the financial the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. construction observation, Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than To Misinterpretation other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has Other design team members'misinterpretation or geotechnical created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappoint- engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower ments,claims, and disputes. To help reduce such risks,geot- that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with echnlcal engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory appropriate members of the design team after submitting the provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations", report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti- many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engi• nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. neers responsibilities begin and end,to help others recognize Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer Should participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by respond fully and frankly. providing construction observation. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs The equipment, tecnniques, and personnel used to perform a Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmen- geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for tal findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photo- likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regu- graphlc or electron lc reproduction is acceptable, but recognize lated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have that separating logs from the report can elevate risk, led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironrnental information, ask your geotechnical Give Contractors a Complete consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an Report and Guidance environmental report prepared for someone else. Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface condi Rely on Your Geotechnical Engineer tor tions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help Additional Assistance prevent costly problems,give contractors the complete gcotcch Membership in ASrE exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide nical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written let- array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine ben- ter of transmittal. In that letter,advise contractors that the report efit for everyone involved with a construction project.Confer with was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the your ASft-member geotechnical engineer for mere Information, ISFE PROFESSIONAL FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road Suite G106 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301-565-2733 Facsimile:301-589-2017 email: info@asfe.org www.asfe.org Cnpyngftt 7QQA by A5Fe,inr„Unleeo ASFE grunts written permission to In so,dupliCStion of Uiic document by ony moans whit000s/or IS expressly prohibited. Re-use of the wording in this document,it,wholi:or in part,also is expressly prohibited,and may bo done only with the express rerntiesipn 01 ASFE Or lot purposes of review or scholarly research, IIGER06983,bi .© CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER,701 5TH AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 Order No.: 000542581 PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. DALLY DEVELOPMENT 3316 FURHAM AVE E SUITE 100 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98102 ATTN: CHARLIE LABODA 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. UNIT 10 -YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION,DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206)628-5623 (E-MAIL:HARRISMI@CIT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206)628-8377 DEVELOP?'TNT PLAN: (E-MAIL:EISENBREYK@CTT.COM) CITY OF RENTON • STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206)628-5614 JUN 1 1 1999 (E-MAIL:KINSELLAS@CTT.COM) RECEIVED CHRIS JOHANSON SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER (206)628-5657 ««««««««««««««««««<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>» CIIIC'AC,O'ITI'I.ii INSURANCE C'ONIPANY Hill III RDA op,, • O CHICAGO TITLE SURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER,701 5TH AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 PHONE: 628-8377 FAX: (206)628-5657 ORDER NO: 542581 YOUR NO: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. UNIT NO: 10 LOAN NO: SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT L ORDER REFERENCE INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 1 SELLER: CITY OF RENTON PURCHASER/BORROWER: DALLY DEVELOPMENT LOAN NUMBER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Our Title Commitment dated 04/05/99 at 8 :00 A.M. is supplemented as follows: nt THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH FOUR OF SCHEDULE A OF OUR COMMITMENT HAS BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 33, SMITHER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 76, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 16 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET, ALLEY AND ANY OTHER PUBLIC USES AND PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7401170345. PARCEL B: LOTS 18 THROUGH 21, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 33, SMITHER' S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 76, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. N THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THIS COMMITMENT SINCE APRIL 5, 1999, EXCEPT THE MATTERS NOTED HEREINABOVE. SEE NEXT PAGE ('IIICA(.O 1'1"I11 l\tiL RAM'I ('O\11'.\\\ k.i rriruu i(n,\ na. • C AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN' Order No.: 542581 Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. Unit No.: 10 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT (Continued) 0 MAY 26, 1999 AUTHORIZED BY: KEITH EISENBREY a NOTE: THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT: CTI/SCOTT SMOUSE SCOTT SMOUSE 1/1 DALLY DEVELOPMENT CHARLIE LABODA 1/1 CI IICAGn'I1'I LI INSURANCE COMPANY suri.coxl2/n-2-W/I K CHICAGO TITLE IN 5 URANCE COMPANY 17) R O1800 COLUMBIA CENTER 701 5TH AVE,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 Order No.: 000542581 PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. DALLY DEVELOPMENT 3316 FURHAM AVE E SUITE 100 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98102 ATTN: CHARLIE LABODA 1/1 Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. UNIT 10 -YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER. WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION,DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206)628-5623 (E-MAIL:HARRISMI@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206)628-8377 (E-MAIL:EISENBREYK@CTT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206)628-5614 (E-MAIL:KINSELLAS@CTT.COM) CHRIS JOHANSON SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER BOB BLOEDEL SENIORTITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER: (206)628-9738 CI IICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I'I II.I61'I I/KUA/02rJ neon+. -- :,;ram. 114.'"v'+pR } 4Ati71 r4.v "�,d�-0i irieq 4t l �! %a I S. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE / PA CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY i 1 is N, it CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable it 1 consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor f" of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the 14 land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to the t, provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and 1 Stipulations hereof. PA This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or t policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance , of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies '.' committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is 4 not the fault of the Company. r: 9.. It In Witness Whereof,CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorizedo .Z signatory. k: tN k: rt PA N oIssued by: o CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY k pi 1800 Columbia Center By: 9 701 Fifth Avenue a Seattle, Washington 98104 „� ... ..cam o f p.POR s.93 ;, (206) 628 - 5666 (. tq F �'`- �-��- h o n President °\ SEAS By: r: $ q —`1,4q4.),NittAioa/ (irkti Secretary *. l A Y ! T;T('AGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPS • COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH A. Title Unit: U-10 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Phone: (206)628-5623 A.L.TA.COMMITMENT Fax: (206)628-9738 SCHEDULE A Order No.: 542581 Officer: MIKE HARRIS/KEITH EISENBREY Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. Commitment Effective Date: APRIL 5, 1999 at 8 :00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $0.0 0 1992 STANDARD Premium: COMMERCIAL PRIOR POLICY RATE Tax. Proposed Insured: DALLY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.00 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.00 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2 . The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3 . Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 4 . The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT CI IICACin TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WITAcomA/O$ $/w.K CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 542581 Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) PARCEL A: LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 33, SMITHER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 17, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 16 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET, ALLEY AND ANY OTHER PUBLIC USES AND PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7401170345. PARCEL B: LOTS 18 THROUGH 21, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 33, SMITHER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 17, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ducma6/1-15-97/rlm • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Order No.: 542581 Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. D. Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights, claims,or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records,or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY wt.TA(OMB CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 000542581 YourNo.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.780. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. a 2. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783930-0305-08 LEVY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 51,800.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENT: $ 3, 000.00 AFFECTS: PARCEL A. c 3 . THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783930-0315-06 LEVY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 163,200.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENT: $ 5, 000.00 AFFECTS: PARCEL B. CI IICAGO I I I LE INSURANCE COMPANY dtacmb1/1.5-97/r1m CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 542581 YourNo.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 4 . GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783930-0305-08 LEVY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 51,800.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 3,000.00 • GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ NOT DISCLOSED PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT DISCLOSED AFFECTS: SPECIAL TAX FOR CONSERVATION PURPOSES AS TO PARCEL A. s 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : YEAR: 1999 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 783930-0315-06 LEVY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE-LAND: $ 163,200.00 ASSESSED VALUE-IMPROVEMENTS: $ 5, 000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ NOT DISCLOSED PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT DISCLOSED AFFECTS: SPECIAL TAX FOR CONSERVATION PURPOSES AS TO PARCEL B. 6. MEMORANDUM OF GROUND LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LEASE DISCLOSED THEREIN: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY clla®b2/rIm/1.5-97 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 542581 Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS LESSOR: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LESSEE: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C. , A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED: JULY 7, 1995 RECORDING NUMBER: 9507071004 c 7. ANY INSTRUMENT TO BE EXECUTED BY CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATUTE. SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE OF AUTHORITY MUST BE SUBMITTED. a 8 . THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. NOTE 1: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN) . **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY cllacmb2/dm/1-1597 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 542581 Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04 . SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTIONS OF LOTS 16-21, BLOCK 33, VOLUME 9 PLATS PG 76. AS OF APRIL 5, 1999, THE TAX ACCOUNTS FOR SAID PREMISES ARE 783930-0305-08 AND 783930-0315-06 . END OF SCHEDULE B CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY cltacmb2/rIm/I-IS-9"I CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 542581 Your No.: C/RENTON-DALLY DEV. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS a THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS COMMITMENT: CTI/SCOTT SMOUSE SCOTT SMOUSE 1/1 DALLY DEVELOPMENT CHARLIE LABODA 1/1 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY cicacmb2/rim/1-1597 Hi CHICAGO TITLE .L URANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE (206) 628-5666 .IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. Smither's First Addition to the Town of Renton, 9/17 PI c/7 • II �bpj Ni. _ - .1. —,„„ ` ` t 4r!f ....1 , . �m mzi 1.4 • !LIMN . . �• t 4_ R/,f7, ' .'emu �_ �©,v .f, i ' t Z11,4,4, • ;I /7► • .� pE 1 •k•' o :• 4• _ •5v rr® a,,,.,4'. 1 •s , ' _. iim, *%Z l, 'At '**' J l0�3:3 4 ; 2 ,.w fe:i � r / /gOr, ''',4. .•�1f16 •4 �v, lilt ^' I S r_ 7 ,M , l'—ft---'12' i S..t ' IRO ST i... ... +4 ♦ l0 44 44.44 r0 :s. ,• i I • o -, • 1. 111111111 4 1 H •• ...t i IN1115 %./4 4• 4Q 4• ++ 1 '2'.. i • •" 711111 /'O.ti+= ••i,;;1* 0 rr7f41 • 1=7 ^c. 7Z•24i• =7 " 'r� ,;t `r ! i A I /.. �gi •-••,.•, iwo Q,/(1 S/• a r<= n+';; tf. ^ ••a j '•t r,!'2 . 5 ' u1 n ��,/• • j HIMO� /O :4 g ,t/: 4' ,A :�< 0.t V. ,e ..fir k a �. f -„ 4: (-1(-1 , t4. • /, .;,I;---/�� ,_ .•7 ,/ ®l.:■� ,e I� . '/t ,�(r• Z �(,F• •is r; I^ni�- !�t p Ana 3IIIIMME M ./7 8 �l.• : /3 .5''r •�r11 i ,aryl�O�'t i ^e moor m .-r.1 "rem—"`'-!:-..�+w•J ` , • , .p lir S. FOURM [ST.i • Tom' t -I.2',I• =4,.1/• 4f 3•,•t.,+7 i S 4 S.L % ••• O. •'.� _�,rJ 4;0f t� 7 '5, o � A n 'J �i ri ,.11y. i,ti��_ -r tA� `."j• o 'r.l o -2 "v=is '`,9 . Ads w r.. 4 ✓jtl' I j�.Q UY,• /ei t7 e�.•• •a ,•.•• r.l^• y;i •• 3 /e • • T 1_/• '., .e t/ 2 w/,.�,7_ j5Q.."-'�"i • '• toCr r " ,� i• ` ;�'�,�il q t ,.•r7.1 ' 7 •re-`—/f•r fie' •.vAl..' /,015=.. , aio .•• •r+ e,t�:�+(l A •• re- • � 6 J' / �7. I .,i /.,, = f::•"0 . •U•e. '� '°.'•i'•i. . ••'• • r •6 g/ � ,►'•,s• - ? _'-7F" i/2 ', n` i - `,„te er Co' ,� �',1sf'� t 7.�.s r t • 7 J ,4 i n f 4`ih,'irr — N i"w • ,• 1r 1 q'f �.d ,/+(4• H. . : /) t 1" r% .3'" f r P /•inaliman «M r 4 M yft } ' "loj� �l • J , f J�' v S. i fling ST. _ .„ A �� t t •�r ,%al i 2p•%. 2.1 E •✓ - ., BMw •< a t MIME .4. ie a r i - •s ;II.No MIZa s '",.••O .ff 2. r /j1 t.' ^ .s j,� `.- • •4 ✓/�� MEI t T 17 ` ®�` • � ��,• �t•+e -gar .7J�n' �I"�m� w•.��®. .jjr n. �j / `•►'li I •,•:/r, M • •y .... to O MAP EXCLUSIONS (Cont'd.) 4. Any claim, which arises out of the ....section vesting in the Insured the estate c. ..._3rest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ALTA LOAN POLICY FORM (10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii)the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separa- tion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encum- brance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage)arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is con- tracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan 2 3' Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural3AND4 Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if.applicable 4 Floor Plans 3AND4 Geotechnical Report z AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping.Plan, Conceptual 4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument); Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 .5 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 Tree Cutting/Vegetation Clearing Plan 4 c Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map4 Wetlands Planting Plan 4 Wetlands Study4 This requirement may be waived by: tj� 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: FDOVItt t7U t�1�► `r/q IZTVAt"`� 2 Public Works Plan Review Section � r p � 3 Building Section DATE: � j 1p 7 4 Development Planning Section **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 06/11/99 15 :42 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9902799 Amount : 1, 512 .54 06/11/99 15 :42 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 2701- DALLY HOME Init : CRP Project # : LUA99-090 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 783930-0315 Site Address: 333 BURNETT AV S Total Fees : 1, 512 . 54 This Payment 1, 512 . 54 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 512 . 54 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 12 . 54