Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA98-100 362304-9086-05 BARBER ASSOCIATES 271736 7979 S 180TH ST KENT WA 98032 362304-9091-08 DRAINAGE GIST 1 71777 P 0 BOX 297 KENT WA 93032 362304-9096-03 CASCADE FEDERAL CREDIT UN 542434 PO BOX 58450 SEATTLE WA 9.3133 362304-9100-07 WACKER ASSOC 710941 C/O THE MADISON CO 415 BAKER BLVD 1200 TUKWILA WA 98188 362304-9104-03 DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 839700 PO BOX 297 KENT WA 98032 1Z5381-0390-0Z BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 741441 PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 777 MAIN ST 02680 FORT WORTH TX 76102 252304-9054-06 DRAINAGE DIST 1 062152 C/O JOHN NELSON 601 WEST GOVE KENT WA 98033 362304-9001-07 RENTON BUILDING 1-7 772496 C/O MCELROY . GEORGE & ASSOC PO BOX 565048 DALLAS Tx 75356 362304-9002-06 CITY OF RENTON 369700 200 MILL AVE SOUTH RENTON WA 98055 362304-9018-08 KLAPPENBACH DOUGLAS W 729999 411 108TH AVE NE STE 530 BELLEVUE WA 98004 SbL3U4-903Z-00 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 840806 707 WILSHIRE BLVD 13036 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 362304-9033-09 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 840806 707 WILSHIRE BLVD 1303 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 362304-9036-06 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 TAX DEPT 1700 E GOLF RD 0400 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 362304-9071-02 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 340806 707 WILSHIRE BLVD 03036 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 I COMMENTS tAAAAAdiibibbibbddibibbbbhirhhhi�h bit 4 xa'i is fc A 000020-0013-01 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 TAX DEPT 1700 E GULF RD 1400 SCHAUMBUtG IL 63173 125371-0010-04 SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK719999 1301 5TH AVE 13635 SEATTLE WA 98101 125371-0050-05 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK669993 1301 5TH AVE 13636 SEATTLE WA 93101 I25371-0060-03 CITY OF KENT 660762 CUSTOMER SERVICES 220 4TH AVE S KENT WA 98032 1 wear NEI 614-BcQ4COD MAP 1 CD, Fe.e ia.4+oAlatvki...E. KENT-RENTON E A 36-23-4 351 E .....F ---..„, i 1 -- 1 ' — . N ; 1: -: s ,• . • 0:. - - s .. i • p .• - fizoJE,c-r I 1 1— I•,•....il ::••T ; 0 4 I, / i NS _ 1 1134 .- .. ...., ,. i• --Ri I N EIR. •HO9.5 PA1K H i. I BURLING • .OVNERN NO4AC /I i ',. i I•• , • D $ TR 1iT NO.1 D I V.2 l''''' 4 , 5 I'.t. • ,... t , , 2 sil 6 i• e fisol . ...I , __,.. '... ... .ACT a I ,,..... ..___ . . ..., ID i 1 ,A Ft K • i NOTES KEY NOTES eD_Y . ro ACCESS 6 61606,61.166 0 ne'-r I 21 AC.PASING PER SCOT662 STANDARDS SEE D13/63. 3 2 CIFF-Sh WORK PER OTT OF .ERAND s,'Rf i[0o C eeDe SF i Des SMUTS ,',e e[ 6-0. ,Y-]' Mu, [ WAY B,•➢e,eSLDCAIpN �y ze STORM OErtxTgx VAULT 4'[WATER SEPARATOR.SEE �� STANDARDS [aw sxE[ Agave PROPREOOSED gore«s,°D �,.••a e a.e p` I SHEETsxs[.cam.a ei CONCRETE c,ois: PANKRO s.[ Al CONVENIENCE FILED 7 o. I ., _ 1� ae. �~ P a:>F SEE,DA"iimo.3 6 NOT USED .a�x >E 3:0 0'613ACV roi PIN• s,uex[c.a �s s �Or BUILD.`� 4 ALLS I l: I� DN. A N`CtRB cro s.) ca.Aci STALLS ALLOWABLE-s,.DDe-,e STALLS ar,a n - / '®. , � � I.• . A -CANOPY. ETS �z © § '•� \\��1,...„..\\\\Q\\\\\\\\\ e,5 2 .OA.:,[a aA.D i a,«'c ,)�"�SHEETS. m7`/ ® IRE •� ® .E 0.1 66016,660 � e=ar.A.�.,e>E:TrF ) Ne.ax /' mpir,�s/�'�- _.- .- • 1111111..A s. A'"'m'.n„.ca I..V ME SSTRIPES./:OVERHAND•063 7. \ `- -_-_ �- - -- I� V t. I -'o3_06..ee.AC51-DD-„De.,, ■ �f�' , 1 c q.Y. s i a�NTP)m+Sr,A INSTALL HANDICAP PARKING I II MD o,.c� e . eiLL. ..D STAVE./EDw xc 1111 o. 9 x 6 PA N..::TN..mE STRIPES 69 • ' ,Y, a.E Y a.€ k "( >A¢s•Yd E A ® 6 ry[ie�z_TV OF R {tt I §D z._r ® ® j 1o. •661ENC.POMP O.,T ar ROWED w 9UM➢.D ADJACENT asoa s • SINTCH .01 "1 1 r.+.w.T/, ® R QED 0143111 a D ne.e J I Q _ r-t-- 1§[ -�—� —-� • \ R M A yF- � — u y 51 [) C.Oo e[anSED YARD ND,exc,E ,PER 4C SPECS,6'ABOVE FIN Ao°Ec.00»z S[[SHEET mz,.P,e[,o X . n- p9T - p-D I �PP .D[T�.PHoN T i. xD x AND,. a�LL i MR u-Y '' aD� os u-rs I I I ® E ® I IV i Ai ,DE rO $ 0 i/ III 'b"tir-Y, +r-D• a-D a) (n CURB Y.Y.TO RDA NORTH APPROACH in t a e-' SITE PLAN Sounurn NW CORNER OF SW 43 D ST.+OAKESDALE AVE SW . — — — — — RENTON,WA. SW 43RD STREET _ _ i V INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY.L.L.C. — - u TV.m.t I.Y.uel eA®.(u)er-es 'NN) i RHL s/ (Too•°'G `E ENVWONMENTAL SERVICES NOTE: FOR TOPOGRAPHY AND 0 ,D 20 .D DO 66 '""""` " '""" LAND CONTOURS SEE GRADING PLAN scut r=so'-a' POW 0163_ .>o w«:16• "aS_1 I IUIVVV I III 11111 . r 0 / 0 r l r r r i ,r r ®SIDE ELEVATION SC IE 1/E•.I-D• V— 1 I V I 1 R `_ s r e M r —ir r —I� r i , F r r r r r r F , ' r s rr r r r i 1 b, i~T� r 9 - r _ l , ,/ / / / X i r / F r / / ! ar l r A . A r r ®FRONT ELEVATION scuE ��e•-r-D. H 1 a i 1 FLOOR PLAN . NW CORNER OF SW 43 )ST.+OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON.WA i rYELI, •t... = MC INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,L.L.C. I-_- xo M oti i.ou.l u Iml m-s• I i•�.i�• �� .• •i�� _._. ,s,0,1.IUC MII1Dp�DIG•MOM (LL SWIMS LLLo__-1 ... ,o ,.. ,.. I.al ,.. ,,. ,,. l.Ql ,I ,,. ,,. I.Q. °L���" MIA,ELIVAX. PIT! a:.,,98 PLAMIN r- FLOOR PLAN '0.. A:., SCUE l/& _ „i Is . M A3 ®aDEE.D D,Eouvu.Mi Ions worm,w I L A DOCARNO N31133 l unnoc LL ROCKS 1 l I I l _;-�;� 5_ —� 1Roo 111B M o anOF °y�l 1 I .. �5 SANDY LOAN�•FOR TREE PLANT.,SHRUBS AND I BAJ.LON CAN GROUND MYERS.USE THE MR OS COMPOST FOLLOW.TOPSOIL NI YTURE NIS TOPSOIL MOM.SH41 BE A TOTAL Of 75S 5 PLANT PITS SHALL BE MICE ME SLIE Cf 11.ROOT BALL,HOONT MO IN0114 6 ALL MULCH IN PUNT BEDS SMALL BE APPROANAIEL Y i 12.MON ALL AOJDNINC HARD SURFACE,ROAD EDGE,TOR OE CURBS.EIC 99699994 ,.,:,inn .,a., 0 _ •�z ® �i MANUFACTURED R.EceK saY�MEd.oR.o OCCUR ORLY PH ALI PLANT BEDS IN W.WES.„��/BARN 9gVIT SAMPLE. UWiPa,w Ka F ®II f I 1 CO h' .P a w • �,,I I I a w ' ?q `' 4 -- � a w . • . . I Qs 1 I B _ _ fey\ o _ —f _ �6'r.,,,, eeees9e99e9e9s99ea9A9999999 �.mb [] � NORTH I . __- I MARK DATE ,.-,,,,,,,,.. - ern., - - - - - - - LANDSCAPE PLAN SW 43RD STREET sounHL nrD ------- rNW CORER OF SW 43RD Sf+OAKESDALE AVE SW FENTON,WA. PLANT UST OTT. Cauv1 NAME •2C!♦EYF•MUMS ��INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY.L.L.C. a s NOR. fsE[ fat F.fYr f our a•m. nw`wu,ortD'wrCRm. o Y ♦ 1RCd�L11R1 of •. ,. fmmN5(� SERVICES D ♦ff.• a,. 1rr CALIPER.e••.u roan IPP��"11 (�») +x RumWEMMOI Eu,YAW #NE.Cdi 0 10 20 M 60 80 M.REVERY Mful DATE wrt sr+/M eY ut♦s REWIRED RE♦aR 1 D.-CMS•r•C. _ ... 1 arP AS REQUIRED .s REWIRfn sop .µ,ANNUALSMO.MI ..an•a o.c. scuc. 1•.zD'-o' POW PM ..5 S.vDD con s REAR uon L-1 i i * 9-6 y 8_Q. LROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IELEVEfl \ \ _' T- - I I __ _. (..- • g•,,, ak ez,o' P ' CITGOJ IF -j: 1 0D00® UNLEADED 10 0O°0O 0O t® tzar 3OBLDG. SECTION O 0D00® rizr 1. r S. MAW our, - STEEL TUBE SET STEEL Csl HIxCES N'DEPTH 0 EEL ENCLOSURE 1 PR/GATE CONC.FM- GATES PAINT FINISH ill iiill���� 1 fl iiii I I VIOI hill IINI.I l i'�iL 11!cip!!!" Iiiii�\ IIm U I I SIGN AND LIGHT ELEVATIONS n �E ANCHOR SLEEVES o.P,AL)CONCRETE E I I gp�1p ryp I I I I U U FM COWER OF SW 43RD ST.+OAKESDALE AVE.SW RENTOµ WA GATE ELEVATION AT TRASH ENCL. Srelr 'Dr INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,L.L.C. ®LIGHT ELEVATION @SIGN ELEVATION anaN�ws ". '® '�'�'" SCALE 3/e'=1'-0' G()IF a/B'=1'-O' .�i� MNDTHCTURS„LEMCEMSEINC E HAVINEIDTIIAL SHINES ��I�].J-F 15.1a1 'oh nao azuew w.neam px51 3.5.eon MIL REVIEW MIA-WON 051E 5/,roe POW REVS .x.M"„«"R A4.1 © 11E.SPRPORA5151.Au moos RE..P oN5 T GXOPY COLUW EMENDED PROV. ABOVE C ROOF,— T cANOPr HGT.T0 x FIELD DETERMINED :'-°" GENERAL NOTES 0 ALLOW e"MO e&r.EEI B°ITCM°` �•y VJgPr a TOP K Bu.pNc rASCM 0. b 65 FAS.SYSTEM ' 2 z.w0U5TNAL Z n I 0 / Gs Es'-E,i MANUFActwE 14../ ORoYSTON MPG` OR SOU...""0 '-" TOP WALL PATE \ { e e°°uc`maRss'E".Ec.L —L — —u—J I ' / i°P W PIArE - --- u TILE w H P. �. _ FbCN LYRIT Y WILL WASHER ALL WASH R HONC sm.PAC GE IK SOUTHLAND FR i P: W I I I— I 1 1 "X"NG MS. WALL E2 NO vas SRosioN c OR...co) �^E "lam v Z Eicrcm�sHEC* xn i i— s c sE Z w I I I G e cc ..s°., 1 I— ;Z.B;.,THhvW000[iERIOR Z G .OF UNEJ I I 1 -- I I suP ORi i�''ALETTTE) W 0_ DOTE a ass I`���EN z x.roiemw W o w*mr«Tf LocArION FOR �-' - (So".w,/.".51—r-i W NLY 9YJT_Orr ROIL Pu °ILL WOOD I p i l CM(TYRE c-z) e e jy; W.ER F_1 WTppW 1111811111 q r�S.kir �� ' � ° x ~ u O E RAWAILS JJI ,_. 'J1 G p 7O ` or,. rOn CU CIPTE C_3) JT •E? V y-5 ^ 1 �`• . * c l _ .4 .._._.._ .L. :._ , , _ ,, ' NOTE PLAITOw.S To SUPPORT 6.1 M..USE s... I I I ' ' I I, \ \ \\\ \ \ �I� fly�III1r I��9 cWu(on -,R7 ' SADDLE((ANGERS FOR zx.SUPPORT TLUT SPANS TO THE MIDPOINT Q Li LVc IJI \ \fng.c"x. R«x: \ \ isI�i �Iunlr i�; OR (n'PE -,D) FASTEN �Lw�WD TorrRAL[w/WO�OGaD SCCRMSTo STUD WALLS OP°rSW w1 ciao D-37 5 WH PLATFORM PLAN 6 WH PLATFORM SECTION 3 PAT EFL E 1 tOFRONT ELEVATION �� *:a ERT"` EE�r,P OAS SSE WOWf Os f=�o LREF SITE PL.OCATION SCALE /.•.,_D" / OGMW J_BOx.e'-O" REATED COM ( 1 !/ ♦ \ l.6"WOOD BLOCX -t I/1• MS SYSTEM CAP ��~�LLAj 6 —1 WALL WASNDi U J II- \ r - LIOMWG SYSTF3. fRODP LMIE LEADER BOX k 1 �.� ����� J TRUSS sum. 53" 43:41t ••�..�.�.. 4/ " 04 9.1 �. 24. UGWASHER WE IF ELEVATION R EXPOSED TO STREET �R/►—/ HMW MTEu EXreo WALL WASHER TO END a BUILDING BOn OF TRUSS ANGL:_1Y ROO�ORNG'IllI{kl� 7 3 y3 CMU(nPE C-x) LOP D<WALi) I'II1/ SEAL. y . - F Se'THICK Em CRbE RYLYOOD III■� �1 W/�2/5 COHT k II i DOWNSPOUT - 3'xx•TRPATEO CIXrt. PE c-A $ I/r COI.ROD q JOIM _ WOOo BLOC 3 gmir'mum I>• 6"CMo n E CDER NO s _ r 11 111 1111111 '\ORYU(TYPE O.C_GI } Inu1■H111u1H 0 CAP DETAIL 11111 19111111 P — N n OiPYE C-3 SW P T RECESS ss NOT r0 SCALE O2 SIDE ELEVATION uBE NE o. -- /' — EXTERIOR MATERIALS .q 9IE Ur/COLOR H C_,R 1398.6" C USH BR.RED-RED o PROOF UNE IWH AWU-M SCUPPER OVERFLOW SCUPPER muss C-,G 616�t16" bM ws ROUGH T.kSTAp GREY-GREY H INTO ALUM LE WEC N OF x 5 0 PLATE C-x B"Y"xt6" SPLIT-RACE $ykB[16B-Tau 047 or WLOR-BEGE( caul wF��SCUPPEN AT SBA TOP c-3 11.1,6" LMESTOxr_WHOE . III `•W. �LSHER f5-1(fE5 SYSTEM) _,i"%6 I. WODiH BURNISHED ..-MATCH C-3 COLOR >: II L NC Srs GROUT w1CN wJgwNG uArtRUL COLOR j OE L.DOE RACK SEE OFT. P LMM mu —PEEP NOLf a WALL PAN IOL.RO.. 5.1.7/- VE9M EXACT LOGE. S LOGTXX+Wk/sourHUNo Y .•x.• ,/z"COMBO.JOINT WITH Do.RSPatR W Vl/ rtuPERn CLASS C SEAMLESS G TGR.TER BACRfR ROD AND SEALANT C (TYPE C-s) {. CIO P LL OOWNSPOIR(uTrw e ¢ C F ` ! L J W RE-rlwsHm f(5S • RU(TM C-3)= \ n 'VERIFY . CU(TYPE C-10 O _ ° I OR (rYPE C-tc) =, TO.PERD CLASS SYSTEM- p'Lw STORM LiL - 6� I I I H sC AU Own c-3) LL/ ®! r 1r• TVP,pr COH.ECOOx TO IF NO T �L _ °'�T __ \ \ \ K't010" OI r°"N CIO" �`O3 BACK ELEVATION 55E r — 0 00 N°0 SCALE ,/.'.t'-0 GP(ES-,) b NOLL°M PETAL XULOW METAL 0 WA55 SPlaH P5OI0NCO RER I� 5 \ ORRICE 000R �R KUMENTT'000R5 ` b , FRP BOTH SIDES EACH R°°F LW.E — C- r J ) 1 :MEa RE: QED 3=!!3 MArgisni —T-- IIIIIIIIilll1ll"' EMT OP P5055 �B.KER ROD JOINT LN all 171111, BEIGE bD -� w f COMMERCML GRADE *_ II J� SEA MLESS CU TAYPE C_A) �J �� WVERSws rEpDs) III ^Hdai `l71 1. CO2 EXTERIOR. MEM= _= 1 :, 98 PROJECT06 6 N0: yW_ A O- V_ O r cm;(Tv1'E E_3) \ . APPROVED. 1 J.SAKI Mu PYRE -IR) r-Y°•.7-,°• z-I PLATE pi ' ' I I .. 111111I OR (TYPE c-,C) O Ism sun O O M WlE:SwED I RII IIII 'CU(1P�C-J_ \ xwLlwDOO� CDC H°LLOWSALTOR�R HouoW METKR MAY I998 N SALES SOOm IDE SHEET 11 I SIDE ELEVATION DOOR TYPES /--1 A 4 !i scuE +/.•.r o" REFER TO SIB SPS FOR HAW°WALF Or 9 SHEETS ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE SYMBOI LEGEND V Z 1' FLOOR BASE WALLS CIRO s ROOM NUMBER or, 9-> -0 J-0 JA'-a• • e-. W fil qE INSTALL R ROCK CUOTfMLL O' DOOR xUIMBER W Z - ;3yy 6 Q R0049 0]k tTW X w1N00w MWx Ip•_a• • ,O'-. z N y 6$Q� Y RQI COLUMN LIME ©J I, OR 'e ULEQ RCx E I OPT.. T SXMLDON Z TAZ F u g o L 3 L CD\v� C�q•RErtE PULL - �1 // 1 - kP `.E FLOOR DRAIN I ER - '• IEIER _��\IEI.J�I1 w O ROOM ROOM 'a g , C.D. I5 1' n ` ,�•cJII Ilta ® um CASE r TM1 I .%HDC-0 I..E..I,. NUMBER NAME ^ HEIGHT REMARK U n """J !COPIER ry PS- LG I TEAT e W 101 MERCI1NDISE • • 1U'-U Sill. Di ...OR o _� • L_ L_J I / �o 102 SALES • •VI 10'-os/e' No. * I L�5, •P. '_- °D.. ", n," - __ J t0 U 'N 103 F.F.PREP • • 10'-O s/e' y' Fi£MBLEEXPALBR•GE NSiOMEF RACES lSON A / W W=n 1oA COFFEE ISLAND • • +01-0 s/•' M.T. METAL THRESHOLD u ° ;ZL:1 BEVERAGE BAR ICED x 105 BEv.BAR • • 10•-0 S/e' S.s. RICE stun � TFA '�" • ���� 2 u.� TOO 8.1020014 • • 101-0 5/e' w.c. w TER CLOSET J AS n n �\� E..) 107 roNEr • 10'-o s/e' W.H. ATER HEATER EeK TXW caFFEE a `�O ' d' ZN3 1De igLET • 10'-0 s/e' . CWTROIs , 1Ww Ix0 GR. iIiSI �� L - Q E O 109 CDC TOTE •• •• •• ••10'-0 5/6' DETNL OMEE ��^' '•' ^•"' y HHpp 110 ELECTRICAL •• •• •• 10'-0 s/BbL.000•ELEC.PANELS REFERENCES • >is�� 1`N-i 0 4� o. � = TOILE i omcE • • 1o'-os/eIIRE ow . r s,. iac s'-°'/:• -,.�....Q �� C.7 .I�.. ©©�� /'NI, /� • 0/ M ~ �: o tTz o OR VAULT • • PRE-FAB FINISHES �' ..,.• �•• � :.aoox �� ooLERw..DOOR SCHEDULE sMuNUMEET R 4 ^6SMT • '; wH•B REFRI°°AFE coo ERCOFFE®UNDWP P•Es+ . D-/�� M•RRLaE.t OE>Azs MOP s•t ®1' ST IOMI . ... 000R FRAME 1.-�, CHEESE P�_•� ,-0' g 3 a, PE..NOTES 0 MAU. T.« ' n%-,�,,-� J BgED PFbIR/ 4i.=/ , �Og 2 ° 4 CBJ'Pv.0 'irirtRwRCrs�DDORe SECTION Ell i �, . w���►`° w/DDDRs 4407♦ __ 5/9-FROM FIN FLR. CO2 EXTERIOR HAND r - f_•A T/ ° 2 DOORS..s.6 k> /AI 000M OR CABHET EU00410N FILL BOX a]I' S1M1 'Air F Y • :BE /K TRcz . o „■O „ •%� wcNo �� �L xYcIIRC MDKnE5s5 21RCS' `' LirA I coRF1En a,ym-- 1 DOOR 1 5 I I 1 1 N a A NCES RN CL-D00RSom+c • EXTERIOR arv.Tzz+ l 4 99 O 1 I I I FAST NOT°oc `� 10- .w oP YY Y I BACKROErnOM �O I Ir0 FOOD ; lil� ^� , OPENING SIZE REMARKS MR I I I PREP.: B-0 � O I- 5 ]1/1-L-�!z. e•_D•z r-0.1 aµ• • ]- -Ax-Aln-a N],wxEER - :.i e'-10 1/z•buNO if r i 1 a'-o'x]•-0'1 WA 1-A1z-All-Av-A1 PANIC N.RDw.RE YON k x 11,,W, I��II p �c ER , e: 3 No �D � ►� h DATER•�[" SEDAN, • 3'-0'X 71-0'1 3/4 S-AlS-AIS-AJB-,AD ONE WAY MIRROR COM ' RETAIL®+ ' `� /C•CD•'E p- u01.10 o0 F-' M ` �J p s s s-0•x r-,1 a/A e-Au-Als-A1B-AT >S"_EI'J`ELF °A1 1 r <, Y �' , Y e > 31-0•x r-0.1 5/6 5-..35-Als-Alb-.0 FRP BOTH SCES RE:/A1 .!J: �1,P 110. 1- F^ Mpg C. ] ] 2•-0.x 7.-0.1 VA S-AJS-Aaa-AM-AI FRP BOTH SIDES Ally �I =D -7 LOTTO cuss`o, e3 ., ., ., °� o , -1 �3S&F • E e z 3'-0•x 71-01 I a/A 1-All-AM-Ass-4 I P�tl _ _ y BPYTI r-1r 1.° _ < �� Esau $ D ' s . 4,L 8 « R GENERA! NOTES El tmenuI y� am` MERCHANDISE , o - .r. MATERIAL LEGEND __I ••EA\' .A J e•-0. y � • I O I • ii t. NO THEE ENT SHALL NO SCSON ALE NECESSARY DROM s FOR ONS THE CONTRACTORS PURE S ® EARTH IN © k> 0TH Iiii —1© O enOFFICE e• Z ]. SIZE,FURNISHED RHCHARACTERISTICS,S.WITH OF K ANDWIPYENT 0 CONCRETE PAVING 0 a[ s. �-1TI1�.1p,F1mR '- L-m BTO BE EFORE ANY SHEDCO.0000OwNETION PERTAINING TERS. THE THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER © CONCRETE IN SECTION e I O FILE 5•FE 7 11 : J A. SSILE AND n ALL OPENINGS FOR u00IOSA AL EWP0EMT AND LC...BLOCK -V I TT��� WORK CONTRACTOR°SMI OF ® U '"' •'_ B� •T�•�k 1 }11 M ITEM EP.ral Mil �_ •• 5 ERRORSTi AND/OR WISSKRS IN ROOM.DOOR.AND.. SCHEDULESS DOWNOT ® RIGID IINSULAR.N - - T�J7f�•'�w+- •� ����-ram••- _ O DESCRIBEIN Cs RACTOROFFROM E.CunNG WORK 5 ® CpmMlgb wJOD F1W,ING O II �E - .'~/J$\ - ///��1 _- ig CT) N 6 RMISG HAND IMST•u uETx CORNER REINFORCING AT ALL EXTERIOR CORNERS ® FINISH W000 e * SWIM • REC I l 11 • O KA AEG / I e - R I- o< BOARD IxauOlNc ODOR.!•Ales AND MUDS m BLOCKINGI .. -(SHOWDIMENSIONSOF GYPSUM J I'00'(TRASH CAM J. 1 , I 1 O To FACE OF CIE SUM BARD AND E OF INTERIOR FIMI 0 FACE -+ l�LIE OF SCOUT ABOVE yiif ,(TO OF EXIERI00 SURFACE. ® 5.- :.I II ®1 1 B TO SHEET 61 FOR THE SECURm SYSTEM An0 RETAIL AUTOMATION = ELM BOARD OR I 1 4 I I F COMPUTER STAR.LOGTgx. = GYPSUM SHEATH..NOTED Fc_ _$�.• 1o'-1r r-o• 1a'-A' -A- 'll ®re• ± ., 9 O SLDCROSTRPLu.CORIOIIODM"1t0/ETC W MIOE OR OUTSIDE OF STORE EXCEPT = CEMENT° PIASTER w_ 11.-0• r l , ae'-o• ` a scowl *r 1z•-O' TILE ® CERAM.TILE # I` MATERIALS SCHEDULE PPARTI°MCCEBOR045NOTE° RE5"`°R"°R ' o ® GLASS IN SECTION HANDCAR RAMP LAGTION O THREADS �3SFS FLOOR �e o.c. k ouN1R TILE 1 RE-DNISHED a00 P•HEL J(EY NOTE PLAN - N lc 12FLORIDA12nPLE PUNNING BOW RnNA•, 1AP•M•RLDE S ()FLOOR '/ PLYWOOD_PAINTED h RQ N MIKE nnbH, II/Y��_' COLOR,]90 uLCDE• sCraE . - RED APE cMPO LIGHT cR. s.ILE C LOR.RED DECOR ET Q PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL IN WALE NEXT TO 00 MERCN00050R GENERAL NOTES. zp�lmCTER RE;1]/u roR PUN verve. FOR REFER 1J/AS FOR ELEv.TpnNL : ASTIRCprMi 0RERp �=RM CHROME. zuti.9-HEIGHT ss TO N.D. ROAA•EERv SHALL ALLOW FOR DRr.,CORNER BEADS `I� ��ISIeSe 0 I CEILING 1❑a'PVC THROUGH WALL•T FLOOR FOR SyRuP LINES ^ F0 EPRROPP FINISHED ENSIOHS eAie O:cMFAC \\\\\\\ L.•l J EXPOSED CONCRETE-SEALED. SHASTA.07 NON PERFORATED WMRr TIE TO NO.A AND BUTT TO VAULT DOOR REWIRED TO INSTAL. _ 1 1 COATS SENLEV PRIM-A-PELL PANELS ❑° DOOR U/NG FROM RR OFF 5/e'OM.BO 1 FACEDsD5PEN5IOn •/BWJ NOSE EXTERIOR SOFFIT SPEC D6 H 1 NR �. \ PROJECT N0: SASE E BASE-B SYSTEM WIRE MPRELUDE XL O g0y1pE N O M�IIF/u-95 tC AND tJT as a�Mon..,x Pmut..ul t�parWF_ CPMr.inu Ca InI OJT'Pluminum SPANNING1R14ORDS11 W.OM4TRU� SPACE I►,\ 98066 MTH PVC SCET F DS US ME...ea) CDLIRG J.SV1T1 J/e'AMP-TAUPE PVC AT ALL OUTSIDE cC.C.All onuv i,os- .M ,'O'n NO numeOX woos a. HOT+.oR c ASFpREO'D APPROVED! p COVE. -AIA'E REE R TO SPECIFICATION PLC CORNERSGUARDSSORE TO BE 1 1/2'A 1 1/21 X 110' . RNI SHELF TINE OF FOUR K, dL WASI , COLOR:P IgiE;ROCK TRASH CANS-LOCATE. 1.4 HEADER ABOVE DATE ISSUED i SHTm1ERgN-SEE PAINT SCHEWI£. STOREFRONT I](MRROVIDE MAUCC+BOSS)�.NT T].CORVAULT NER ONE AT EACH DSP.4UF10 SPLIT FACE OW WY 1998 i. PANT-EXTERIOR-SEE PUNT SCHEDULE. ,,,VINE,,, ODOR-STORE SIDE ER 1. ONE Ai PAY PHONE SHEET SOT SPS GUARDS TO BE 1 1/Y X 1'/1-X LENGTHS AS REOD a. O.AT EACH R/V. ©SHELF DETAIL 3)POST MIX HEADER A 2 :4 ©a'PVC THROUGH CO.UGH WA AT FLOOR.R OPEN NR CALL T� HE PROVIDE OTHER TRSH CANS pWN TOS I (1)-LEFT•ROW FRONT CO NONE OF 9 SHEETS CIVIL — UTILITY PLAN CALL BEFORE YOU DIG i, -I 1 4 ��— 1-800-424-5555 v en T-20' d 0 ,o v 0- UTLRY NOTES v 2 Q TELEPHONE SERVICE 'CL FOMBUES A ERF RWu UGC"-I MgD�I DE gE ( EK EIG I. ABANDONED "41]UOA EAT POER LE R4 CTBEEUHis wli nCONCRETE CP WOOD(i CD) PROPERTY LINES I RouRE O emuea two.U.S.WEST 7 µNDVIYW 3 g2. LINES WY NOT E CIaiwc"ainEnoBEN AS'"' PER CnESN.iW- R 3IL OPERn")IOHO MNLRLmNcwnL BNE [uDP" 4LEoTHEcNPu�z ITWsDRACETHoLeu(E7_N•4m E.,I,ES ULL oCu ,T1pR. I II I IH PLL WRE GCQRDWE I . LL WiEa 5uD CD4PeCnSWL BE PE EDIN .OIO I I I I - 1/ " Co...W RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE G AGENCY REQUIREMENTS IITIUTY LINES DWORMDRAIN.WATER.SEWER, GN ELECTR TELEPHONE, ( « -TWO-WY )« 1«W UNDSCAPE IRRIGATION uE D EC W OUT OUT E 'm OAR W W - � µYNSTE WATERERACE SHALL COPPER CONFORMING TOE �(TYPE-N)µOD THE L� PLE OUPRE=ION a WINGS CONFORMING Cs (,� RNN USING] In_ 1hfl � 1J ::1 w nTEEwiE �uAU A[1aS RcouDP 4fCqxiK iox • VZ). 4S OPE OR 6-INCH SIDF SEWE BE 2 PE PIPE COVER N. --I,N a CC • ir SEWER SERVICE v4LL INCLUDE DETECTION TAPE / ��- 'uI - I • TO50.C.mI I EGENa , •EiW • • ,Ai l COST OVERHEAD POWER —POW) )it E•,aroi a . .. x , -_ 'I E. '' FF-2 ) FF. / �` COST.vR aWE =_ ___' _—` �I 4 � ; mE `,..Ni �• I I ii w� I'.- 1 Q E ty. T .,,, PROPOSED SWEAR' PROPOSED WATER a a • �, 4-II I PROPOSED STORM N - ! ''"' E ` _ I gi -, I I E17. ) FRO.D ,.,WER�,n0, CO t I I w:e � III I F�PDKEB aS 0 .:. r fill?"' 1`71 DpM•a06{ BIM SORER E-Ae0 I f/ <.i.R(EI W R),q I 1 Ef' 1G. • Kq+I 1. _ p,'( 0 • / �ecau.FaTe • . —.R.•J' -�1. , '•�A'•, S - wI MI5 IS MOT I.CONSTRICTION PUN.WS P.WS KEN PREPARED N. .•• •, • '4 •• . - •V. i / II / Rm:NKp TOWOW.APPROXIMATE PPRROXIR TE UCH,.LLOOUDON'S OUECwiER,BLEPHOEC WER. W \ d •.8. } a xnlWl PUGET PowER. ON NGTrDwvm ARE ~ • d .f3�ArD+ ANOPY } �� REFLECT TIOSAN FZESPUNS DR .V• I IIE, DNB REFER LATEST TIE LATEST PLANS ISSUED BCO"P ONLY µPOWER.PIL �. y \ • • �IJS GR D W 9WGTW NATURAL GAS FOR CONSTRUCT.. RESPONSWE SOP.THE D STORE WEOAUiFOE K101[ _ __•_-- _- _ ET 1,0 ImTEEi6 NO sRr COSING lRivRRic6 rT.INER SOPO MS PALL W.WING 1.111UTE LOCATE• _LrcwTI MBE P.5 GRou allows:uµc 1 • 1MF '1N1£K e /Y YE.EEL Oi D'NEKIHR OR E COMSEXEX. U.105 S CRCs.TO PIPSCA, RO VFW.. 5.10.ON',o. W W 1/R TER 1-1/]OOIIE4ID WG IEIf]t \ aKy]KmE IKai. �i ry TM Eye m \Vfll.,, Y T M.:'�` 1 Y SINCE m COIIEEnR \ r°SWUM ONCE M 11 I '\R`5>,L' I .PL. °�Ov.UPON NE .HE COMIC.9.1.CPSULT RRO.MUSEN g$e m r Ra,E Al/FROG PR TO PROCEED w. n$ wa g Li C ) ... 11 0 I..I+ T.w f r Ecu n mama.xc.m ii ix � ;' -van.aDl ,� R-NAGE COST BOBO K 1fJ BB1N'RI'W trO 1H.,T¢ , ❑ STrM /'_, -1-- ..____T TW,ERESER[E,"E� ,, S --- ° N:—. ,RiE'--• — -g�-- --8�-- ��� FRS, I ''(e,s_c.;. ,�vA,41 I 4N • y !*'i'�, `, n1 ..�.T --'� i I — �sx.K all vacar NW TRENCH PA1CM_� S.W.43rd STREET `: .!r i; I\W E a- CONK o A. ',OPAL'01 d b•- "� : Ii'-4„min ROIII Ixaree-m,�`.w„�-ii -. N :s a::��n ;EXPIRES n,-D.,-f CCFREC)m COSMO WATER MAN ,y.4. w --)WSW'1 w PER anm,DP.OF a) —_ -- R R Em Ex R --h- -- �EA,-, FOc4 APPROVAL CfTY OF RENTON ------- —-- _--- ____— -_--- (1 7E>ErnParR.EE=rrr of PUBLIC r•.oF.KE. ] _111.7371 ..1aKNr-DW WI--- — - / ,Rms1-EONGn UTILITY PLAN -_. PRELIMINARY Z B m WORD = O REND , ,w Re WI WSW . am care N-IR.. ,�__s— - .- m ----w----___ _ 1,4b1 NE I C -Bad D MAP ,� Fr, 41- %-.A 4_ DAD. LE • KENT - RENTON E% 36-23-4 351 E NOTE.Kroll Maps are complied Iron Ott oe Racers% '345 E and Field Surveys They ere produced for'Waren°.Pee only end no warranty re expressed or embed —.—. 13 .90 • Ft c-) STERNCO LAND CO. zzi, �/i I ErA'-S �Q(n( iyM 1 i '� o ���— ' ' ______eff I M L__ ___�`� '` 1�r� ST EAN ST ER NCO LAND CO. , . I ✓r S.W. 41 S T ST. I ,,,,'%'- i f ;1li l 9.45 Ac ii a ( 0 gI - I T L u `/ ID64Ac �! 'j `i1 '1 c z/ 4.90 Ac - 0 Q i 1 r 1, GM I I f, f GEORGE JOAIENT2 `y J M�bE r I I 6.05Ac.. c*l1 1 a 1Ro.mcT w ,,, `t� pr . e ! SITE ' Q Y `tc I -- 6, STERNCO LF NO W it ( S 'r STERNLO I ST ERNCO Y , !, I I( CECILA M LA 6D LAND CO xa ' O it I CAMPBELL Sig ..41 +1 GEORGE 81 i ` .AL' JONIENTZ , rlj tl� l a ✓'r C. Ac.l � I I zc.L! ilk 174 A[ PT u42 i. 1i IVAc I a 1 232Ac 5.594c. Zt.3 $dq I: zit ; sa r9 I es5.50 rt.a7 i 38046 r[.ao r • t iJIR M.$ $ . 0O0 DOD6�DpoOCCO,=0=c000a,oDoo' crpo, 43R�DOo=ocT�or=3 E-Cgd e� eRATE LIMIT e , -Naar_-- -735' l7 — . _. _ _ . T - a. .aa.as KENT o o!o a!!s> T -- r G,-PORATE� LIMIT I 1 rBROOK B S / NgSS PARK i '/ p zS F P 1 N --- _ i PURL I NGTtDNK NOF HERN NO'PAC P 4 o I A-L D I$TR I CT NO. I D 1 V. 2 i eZone- to A r — I �$ 53 4 1 5 6 u 7 8 P9 xil a \\ r cso' ' lI r9.e r cz1 131 I. ,�` d Ie rS ! ,4.... vl • na l ��„.. N P+ 6301 IIr TRACT D e/e`Nr= �tn w..�1 6�R00„-, 1 i r v* , a Crj Mlj� saw s+, ,�\\ SR-85-II w 0!' ^'� .Mw`\ f3a B' _.I L ,. �� a r ra uMtri ���tl _VV • a !'.[ a, M fig'+ '.'°yb i. n°'.n .' en 4 (21 off 622 in ` f{ �' • \ TALLY CORPORATION CIVIL — GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1 1-800-424-5555 (n a (n r-20' m a ® q al w Ir meo.3,x i„ ry—wo ni` O 11-'11 ) ;F RR - /nlu=a.z: Exis wf uasort `. lmr 12 CI CC t!V R'meq.]t1t - - --• -.�.Y fi___' 6E a_c:'- , St - O O z ♦ E.I]bl.,. I a r O I OJ � . H RR{6 s3•W I }p5 pp' i / ~W CB kz ;: ) A• �` I oRM'Iµ�1�g� / ' p d E-,s Fs - - - fi, �m i,I .� IiR�IY m s asox—� �_ .. w e• •u ��" • 1 II on swarms Z (Oa} Z ,c :. __§ 4. E>SS9YAi14lLQ4A c., _ - - I y �,'-+_ i'r.».-. FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLYQU Ea u.Esern.R " n � x�.n I O , nE s e%PR cu:0,-11T CD 1 � � •��.� II f.r FF-2330 — tli� •—1 •■�, i •`V itI�� .,. - Is � . . I, . •� , � I 3 7�m • .. ct az 11 • • — •• ,11 1., ‘:, ii - lik a Cl...o ,• - \Nei i: E a CURS BROX .1. •,I �` r< a A c, < NaEFOR mnMOE t =8 b'we(me(mx ssl e a un �' \' _ I • I ° �7 m nu m us OO'°aran; $ �k \ '' 1a y. Clem Fa Q Q J ...... - - [�a ' W .... Y `� • ! �...r '" I 1 11n' ___ \�-- III �R.,OUX1 ❑ Z Msl r S • 8 ' 1 _.. 'ps `\ ti\ I d F mrYcs S p _ - ,�/I// �E...,a, •o' e I F.�; i_ ......._ 1 i. tl _ • r " , \ �' �______ ______«_ _______tl_____m E41N y R J I R-s pr ro%) . ,99 ap qq • • . '�. c.RR rc , MO // y •• tmak to '' r�.+p���q.V�.R I \I ''�.. I \`Il p n�i,rm..n1 ... t :L 7 8 m sn•a v.�e � � Rul, Q -- r. ' .�417 R • 376ar, Gpes ti I• iN tux,12j7r • . . __ _: _. : R FREE 0 RUM VI _ E!et Q- „�, '' M1e MOW PER Oa MOM. II - _ . t ° o. 4 MR RE I oT. —•r`- ,,it if. _ , ,If r m,c S r/i\ ..,..,(se'ca.:q EXPIRES D,-a,-vvco ; _- _. ------- ---- -P---- - -- -- ii_ / ---- �oEaenEo CITY OF RENTON ,I P t<.oy FOR IfF110YI1 o6=PnFRTr.IEnF'r OF Puaulc WORK. or VD - - - - - _ - - --- ii __ GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN - -. d * /PRELIMINARY Z : RHL DESIGN GROUP INC; 425 746 6836; MAR-27-00 13:31 ; PAGE 1 /1 ./23/2000 22:05 4257024773 IDC WA PAGE 01 tb ''O.: CITY OF RENTON ,;.a, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor DEVEI OPAAF►vr sspmeEo Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 24, 2000 CITY OF RENTON _ , Mr. Richard Gumpert MAR 2 8 2000 -11 -: �P�f r &if Independent Development Company /rz- - 1-2-11742 1"Street South RECEIVED Klr<tand, WA. 98033 SUBJECT: Site Plan Revision for 7-11 Zelman Site (LUA98-100, SA, ECF) Dear Mr. Gumpertz This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the 7-11 Zelman Site site plan (letter of February 13, 2000), The Zoning Administrator approved the original site plan on July 21, 1998. The approved site plan included en 8,500 square foot commercial retail building on the west boundary of the site, along with the 7-11 store and service station, which have since been constructed. The modification request reduces the retail building to 7,681 square feet. The location and orientation of the commercial building on the site is. generally the same, although the proposed building would .be setback approximately 47 feet further from the SW 43n0 Street street frontage. The original plan included 47 parking stalls and the revised plan 35 stalls. Driveway access, on-site cirOulatlon and landscape areas on the site would remain generally the same as the approved site plan. A trash enclosure would be relocated. The site plan regulations define a major adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as a "substantial change In the basic sib design pion, intensity, density, use and the like generally involving more than a ten percent (10%) change in area or scale." (Section 4-9-200G). The commercial retail building would be reduced in size from 8,500 square feet to 7,681 square feet. This decrease of 819 • square feet represents a reduction of 9.6% of the approved commercial building area. The reduction in parking from 47 to 35 stalls Is e 25.5% decrease. it appears that most of the decrease is due to an Increase in the landscape area proposed in the northwest corner of the site. The reduced parking would still meet parking requirements for the commercial building. The parking regulations require 1 space per 500 square feet of gross floor area for smaller retail establishments. This would equate to 15 parking spaces for the commercial building. The commercial building is speculative but appears to be divided into 4 spaces. This would then meet the definition of a shopping center. Shopping centers require a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. This ratio would equate to a minimum of 31 and a maximum of 38 parking spaces. The proposed site plan modification would affect less than 10% of the total site area that was included as part of the approved site plan. The reduction In the building area is also less than 10%. Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the site plan. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval end mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the project. The applicant should also understand that environmental review and preliminary plat approval would still be required to divide the existing parcel Into two legal lots, as was discussed at the pre-application meeting of February 7, 2000. • This decision to approve the revisions as a minor modification will have a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. PMT reductions (8 A x 11) of each revised sheet must be submitted for the file records. It you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7218. ^Sincerely, Poat-Ite``Fax Note I- 7671 Date 21 'Ipare�s,► ( ' 1 To Leyte k) . k. flit - From /�,,„l TYK""111 CoJD©pt.lit. e trovm- Co. �l je-',� ana Hanson P���e* �3 rho�a« 1[` P-44(01-1 Zoning Administrator • Fax �0 .1 co Fox It 1� 3 (o-tps6 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 in Tn:s paper sontainr 5014 mcycWd matunu,20%past oa+eumer IV" t% t4-` CITY ( RENTON 11i Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor February 24, 2000 Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Mr. Richard Gumpert Independent Development Company 742 1st Street South Kirkland, WA. 98033 SUBJECT: Site Plan Revision for 7-11 Zelman Site (LUA98-100, SA, ECF) Dear Mr. Gumpert: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the 7-11 Zelman Site site plan (letter of February 13, 2000). The Zoning Administrator approved the original site plan on July 21, 1998. The approved site plan included an 8,500 square foot commercial retail building on the west boundary of the site, along with the 7-11 store and service station, which have since been constructed. The modification request reduces the retail building to 7,681 square feet. The location and orientation of the commercial building on the site is generally the same, although the proposed building would be setback approximately 47 feet further from the SW 43rd Street street frontage. The original plan included 47 parking stalls and the revised plan 35 stalls. Driveway access, on-site circulation and landscape areas on the site would remain generally the same as the approved site plan. A trash enclosure would be relocated. The site plan regulations define a major adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as a "substantial change in the basic site design plan, intensity, density, use and the like generally involving more than a ten percent (10%) change in area or scale." (Section 4-9-200G). The commercial retail building would be reduced in size from 8,500 square feet to 7,681 square feet. This decrease of 819 square feet represents a reduction of 9.6% of the approved commercial building area. The reduction in parking from 47 to 35 stalls is a 25.5% decrease. It appears that most of the decrease is due to an increase in the landscape area proposed in the northwest corner of the site. The reduced parking would still meet parking requirements for the commercial building. The parking regulations require 1 space per 500 square feet of gross floor area for smaller retail establishments. This would equate to 15 parking spaces for the commercial building. The commercial building is speculative but appears to be divided into 4 spaces. This would then meet the definition of a shopping center. Shopping centers require a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. This ratio would equate to a minimum of 31 and a maximum of 38 parking spaces. The proposed site plan modification would affect less than 10% of the total site area that was included as 1 part of the approved site plan. The reduction in the building area is also less than 10%. Therefore, the proposed changes are approved as a minor modification to the site plan. The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of environmental review still apply to the project. The applicant should also understand that environmental review and preliminary plat approval would still be required to divide the existing parcel into two legal lots, as was discussed at the pre-application meeting of February 7, 2000. This decision to approve the revisions as a minor modification will have a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. PMT reductions (8%x 11)of each revised sheet must be submitted for the file - records. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7218. �I Sincerely, 6(„,,z .), -, /'na_i_74b4. 11 ana Hanson Zoning Administrator 1 . I 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 This oaoer contains 50S.recvrind material 9nc/nnct rnnc,/mr.r 1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON FEB 16 2000 INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RECEIVED 742 1"Street South 1216 N.Tustin Avenue Kirkland,Washington 98033 Orange,CA 92867 Telephone (425)827-3688 Telephone(714)288-6840 Fax (425)889-9453 Fax (714)288-6848 705 E.Oak Street,Suite E Kissimmee,FL 34744 Telephone(407)933-0286 Fax (407)933-0950 February 13, 2000 Zoning Administrator Renton City Hall—6th Flr. 1055 So. Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 Re: Minor Modification 43`d& Oakesdale Shopping Center Pre-Application File#00-05 To Whom It May Concern: We would like to request a minor modification for our proposed shopping center in lieu of a second site plan approval. As you are aware,we had originally been approved for an 8,500 square foot retail development with 47 parking stalls. We have made some revisions to the original plan and would ask that the City consider a minor modification process since the intent of the proposal remains the same and is a less intensive plan than was previously approved. (See attached plans) Please disregard any previous submittals. We intend for this to be our final request. We apologize for any inconvenience or confusion this has caused the City. Ve9c truly yours, Richard A. Gumpert Executive Vice President AGREED BY OWNER: RSJ HOLDINGS, LLC By Och,-4 • , , chard A. G .ert anaging Member 1 1 2 I I 4 1 5 I E I 7 I 8 I O M J 2 L / _ 50'-SE 0' 24'-B" 19'-II" 'Ir i PRE\ SEVE 12'026'LOADING ZONE I_y 124.99. i in`r R=2.6 ` i I ES J m • PROPOSED RETAIL BULGING (7ARI SF) GROUP N OCCUPANCY — TYPE V-N CONSTRUCTION REFER TO SMT. FOR FLOOR PLAN M —__...._. F.F.-23.3' C] Q R : N pj 0 H3 0 LC) _ CU Li NORTH a) F F cam— Q o\— 3 1. s To O / rmim7Immmi7 0 10 20 40 60 60 Cr) 6 STALLS 0 9'-0• $ E •1 PEDEI E 0 o PANI O E Cr . SCALE: 1"=20'-II' II O S b �—PROPOSED LANDS( _L - _. - } e I— ;7 \ k — — Q Et - . . _... . - -- - - - -- Ci gwp — 3 n ` ..... o • - f,,,,R,/ 390'. MAIOC [JATL ,N.� -_ _._. _ n4,_ `_D o= 43rd + OAKESDALE CENTER o 61 a; Q �oc — NEW SHOPPING CENTER c o, SW 43rd STREET 0 i3 RENTON,WA. II `< o R3 — N :.....••• .,,,••.••.•.••....:..�...:..:::::.:. ",,.. _ INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. C ..< ...................._... .._ _ CU jn B 742 BM Stn.E. NY1454.TA BBOM.(424)821a888 B C i Q] << ARCHITECTURE•ENGINEERING•ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I 11550 14018 AVE NE NOD,BELLEVUE,WA.98005 (425)748-4877 d618 IWLG ARCHITECT: JOHN W STROBEL L— - NHL E@VINW IRfflAL DATE DATE.12/16/99 1—I V1 i _ PRELIMINARY I- 3 APPROVED HEALTH PLANNING DR.BY AYH w Z A BLDG PERMIT APPR. ,IOU$ GENERAL BID A C D L5 PLTWIT REVS BH�90]0.40 CONSTRUCTION CC 0_ Do not use drawing SD1 o tor construction Inmwled 1 I 2 I 3 1 4 I 15 I 16 17 18 LL ®S0uT14ANO LUMORARW,AU.RIGHTS RESERVED 1946 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 11 19991018000638 PAGE 001 OF 005 10/18/1999 10:53 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON BS 12.00 BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number: 362304-9045&9109 Project File#: Street Intersection:SWC of SW43rd Street&Oakesdale Ave.SW. Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Zelman Renton,LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property now located at: in the City of Renton,County of King and State of Washington,to-wit: See Attached. By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. 99-Ga 707, Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA BILL OF SALE Property Tax Parcel Number: 362304-9045&9109 Project File#: Street Intersection:SWC of SW43rd Street&Oakesdale Ave.SW. Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Zelman Renton, LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the Grantee,as named above,the following described personal property now located at: WATER SYS.VEM: Length ,maize Type L.F.of Water Main L.F.of Water Main LF.of Water Main each of " Gate Valves each of " Gate Valves each of Fire Hydrant Assemblies • SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length Type 1,278 L.F.of 8" " PVC Sewer Main L.F.of Sewer Main L.F.of Sewer Main 6 each of 4 8" " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes each of " Diameter Manholes STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: Length ,Size L.F.of " Storm Line L.F.of Storm Line L.F.of " Storm Lim - each of " Storm Inlet/Outlet each of " Storm Catch Resin each of Manhole STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk L.F. Asphalt Pavement: SY or L.F.of _ Width STREET LIGHTING: #of Poles 13v this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person ' or persons;whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. 11111111111 19991018000638 PAGE 002 OF 005 10/18/1999 10:53 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON BS 12.00 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. INDIVIDUAL FORM OFAC / DG EN Nvtaty`Se8 rii Efe�vilhir�' z" -* TATE OF V S 4NEMIN ' l�I ..' 7.••.�.y.o .:. Pit 1f•^..; k �,, ,� ,,,• ,`,yam: ;�;,ISedgy. that. know on have sa'- ctory evidence that_ !SHA C.WLSO` t'—‘ signed this instru d . Ii o • -.:ed' o be hi ;, ee and vo tary act for the uses and purposes 1,?3 A t_; ,^s C�ll��►enti/ d he instru -. .I • .. s`' ' 1V' 'ublic . o s Sta of 41402filk# • •y a...' �p-�`7 s: 1 i' IF I/ Dated: y 'Y Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDU L FO M 0 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE •F WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Notary Seal must be within box REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: 19991018000638 PAGE 003 OF 005 11111111111 10/18/1999 10:53 KING COUNTY, WA 12.00 CITY OF RENTON BS Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 19 ,before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: 111 19991018000638 PAGE 004 OF 005 10/18/1999 10:53 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON BS 12.00 CITY OF RENTON . PLANNING,BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FINAL COST DATA AND INVENTORY NAME OF PROJECT WTR- WWP- Oakesdale Business Campus SWP- TRO- TED • - Per the request of the City of Renton,the following information is furnished concerning final costs for improvements installed and turned over to the City for the above referenced project. W : Length Size Type L.F.of WATERMAIN L.F.of _ ' WATERMAIN L.F.of WATERMAIN . L.F.of WATERMAIN EACH of • GATE VALVES EACH of • GATE VALVES EACH of GATE VALVES EACH of FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES $ (Cost of Fire Hydrants must be listed separately) SS , (Include Engineering and Sales Tax if applicable TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM S SANITARY SEWFR SYSTEM; STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. Length Size TYPe Length . Size _ Type 1,278 L.F.of 8" • PVC SEWER MAIN L.F.'of STORM LINE . L.F.of SEWER MAIN L.F.of STORM LINE L.F.of • SEWER MAIN L.F.of STORM LINE 6 EA of 48 DIAMETER MANHOLES EA of STORM INLET/OUTLET STORM CATCHBASIN EA of • DIAMETER MANHOLES EA of EA of STORM CATCHBASIN if Engineering and Sales Tax $ 34,560 (Including Engineering and Sales Tax Tapplicable) If applicable) S TOTAL COST FOP.SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM $ TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE $ SYSTEM STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk,Asphalt Pavement) Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk: L.F. $ Asphalt Pavement: .SY or L.F. of Width S SIGNALIZATION: (Including Eng.Design Costs,City Permit Fees;WA St Sales Tax) • STREET LIGHTING: (Including.Eng.Design Costs,City Permit Fees,WA St Sales Tax) of Poles S Vic?/ T Casex ai.3 - s33- al/ao Print signatory name day phone M (SIGNATURE) turns/COSTDAT2.DOC/bh (Signatory must be authorized agent or owner of subject development) 111111 19991018000638 PAGE 005 OF 005 10/18/1999 10:53 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON BS 12.00 SA -qg- l0° Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 19991018000639 PAGE 001 OF 005 10/18/1999 10.53 CITY OF RENTON EAS 12.00 KING COUNTY, WA Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: 362304-9045&9109 Project File#: Street Intersection or Project Name: Oakesdale Business Campus Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference numbers are on page . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Zelman Renton,LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Grantor,as named above,for,and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the above named Grantee, the following described property: Additional legal is on page 5 of document. (Abbreviated legal description MUST go here.) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Adjusted Parcels H&J of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No.LUA-98-027-LLA as recorded under Recording No.9809239001,Records of King County,Washington situated in Section 36,Township 23 North,Range 4 East,W.M.,King County,Washington,more particularly described as follows: See attached legal description and exhibit on pages 4 and 5 hereof By this conveyance,Grantor will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the Grantee against all and every person or persons,whomsoever,lawfully claiming or to claim the same. This conveyance shall bind the heirs,executors, administrators and assigns forever. (j q-00 7 t IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. iiirrr INDIVIDUAL FORM OF WLED ME Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF /. COUNTY OFIUN€— Icertiifythat I know or hav sati fa ry evidence that/ signed this instrum nd :>..a.. tic. 1 o: e• . . ie his/hi t ' ;ee oluntary act for the uses and purposes � _ NA.KEISHA C.W!L3l9hkion- e instru••. Commission#109374 �, /�� < _> Notary Public-Ca'i l // / b.P _ -.,ri Los Angeles C , %�� I /'r e State of ♦ l SO / ` " . _ '� ``` 1NyComm.Erp:re;AI�9, .��� �i.�r .._ /.� �_`'//•_/ tment expire : %' /j'J`t/.111 Dated: 9 9,9'iLKi..,�a=._..�itii1YLY.:.:r/t1+`Atl�:L7d.,iJ13'�.:..a.r..+.,.�n r._a_...r..r..r:L; Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Notary Seal must be within box REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: 111111111111110 19991018000639 PAGE 002 OF 005 10/18/1999 10:53 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON EAS 12.00 Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING On this day of , 19 ,before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: NEN19991018000639 PAGE 003 OF 005 10/18/1999 10:53 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON EAS 12.00 0 1.=100' u -1- . a EXISTING 10' X 72' N CITY OF RENTON o ram- ROADWAY AND ii I— UTILITIES EASEMENT T -JN REC. NO. 7407190572 0 I NEW 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT W c 0 ADJUSTED Z PARCEL J W I > . J Q 3 W06 W x w H a 6 co w m Cl) \ / O VJ a Da < Y N 0 o 0 0 / Q ADJUSTED ��, o .9, 4 PARCELI ..............,N1j,1 . . c ,,. \��1A .syzgs; /.. irk , z i . . / 1/4,, LF.8238�0 Jia C/S T ER p� —SW 43RD STREET _ _ "A� LAN. S ® EXPIRES 05/18/01 Job Number SRF Q.- -0 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH Title: 5911 Drown Q. Ail' F KENT, WA 98032 ZELMAN PROPERTIES CO. m i � Z (425)251-6222 Sheet Checked RWC' ;c ;;r u (425)251-8782 FAX SANITARY SEWER 1 1 Dote 9�1�99 is°<r NG SURVEYING. ENVIRONMENTAL D PLANNING, NRVICES EASEMENT EXHIBIT NC ENG\N 19991018000639 111111111111111 PAGE 004 OF 005 10/18/1999 10:53 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF RENTON EAS 12.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 15 FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT All those portions of Adjusted Parcels H and J of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-98-027-LLA, as recorded under Recording No. 9809239001, Records of King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: A strip of land, 15 feet in width, lying 7.5 feet on each side of the following described easement centerline: BEGINNING at a point on the East line of said Adjusted Parcel J, from which point the Southeast corner thereof bears South 01 ° 48' 07" West, 303.44 feet distant; THENCE North 86° 52' 06" West, 6.24 feet; THENCE South 01 ° 48' 07" West, 40.96 feet; THENCE South 01 ° 48' 07" West, 16:50 feet; THENCE North 01 ° 48' 07" East, 16.50 feet; THENCE North 88° 44' 20" West, 298.07 feet; THENCE South 01 ° 11' 17" West, 245.56 feet; THENCE South 88° 48' 43" East, 16.50 feet to the terminus of the herein described easement centerline. / N 4. ,, , ;...x.,.. o•` ; S'Gyc�'`p� 4 iiV. `, ' jr.!4 -�I. 4. .44, i.. ., Q,s,,:e„ .,., 40;,......, - .•AL LA �g EXPIRES 5/18/01 irp Project Name: Zelman Phase I 591IL.020 19991018000639 September 1,1999 PAGE 005 OF 005 RWG/ph/mm 1111111 KINGBCOUNTY10WA3 12.00 CITY OF RENTON EAS • CITF RENTON : ,> Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 10, 1998 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING cn' 7 .._, TON SEP 10 1998 RECF!"ED April Asato RHL Design Group 1550 140th Avenue N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue,WA 98005-4516 Dear Ms. Asato: SUBJECT: 7-Eleven Market/Oakesdale Ave. SW& SW 43rd St. Please advise the owner-applicant for the above-subject project that the left turning movement from Oakesdale Ave. SW and also from SW 43rd St. to the site could be blocked by"C"curbing any time in the future by the City, if turning movements to the site becomes a problem to the arterials. At this time the SW 43rd Street driveway could be moved westerly to utilize the existing two-way left turn lane. Sincerely, Clinton E. Morgan Engineering Specialist cc: Neil Watts Bob Mahn Peter Rosen 98CM120L.DOC\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 % L CITE 7F RENTON " Li , Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 11, 1998 Ms. Karen Wallace RHL Design Group 1550 - 140th Avenue NE#100 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: 7-11/Zelman Site Project No. LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Wallace: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, PA,P,,-„ Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Zelman Renton, LLC/Owners Independent Development Company, LLC FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer AlW Washington State Northwest Region Wi Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CI7 r OF RENTON DATE: June 8, 1998 JUL 3 0 1998 TO: Peter Rosen, Project Manager RECEIVED Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: SR-167 MP 24.42 CS 1765 7-11 Zelman Site File#LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF ` f->t,�) lit D>a 72 FROM obert A. Josephson,PE,Manager of Punning&Local 1' Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, our response is checked below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. X The State requests that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the impact of the project's generated peak hour trips on State Highways and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions,please contact John Sutherland, (206) 440-4914, or Don Hurter, (206)440-4664 of my Developer Services section. I JBS:js IstrsP ns.doc CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2-4ti-� day of , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Re ru - a a c Dectsln- documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Pau( Cases teivana41 Retrvk yl Rkclneued Cru.rnpek . 1 l de pevxde v-t Deoe loPmevc Co. (Signature of Sender) Sravnd,l,ok., II!•.• 5eif3B ler- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for t`tfe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Co , U Notary Publi n and for the State ofhington Notary (Print) My appointmentldkfiFd4LYN M COMMISSION EXPIRESKACH 6/29/9Err9 Project Name: Seve.►n- +C1eUeet t7>e(vnaw Site, Project Number: LUW • 9% - 100 S ft -1ct ` NOTARY.DOC REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: July 21, 1998 Project Name: Seven-Eleven/Zelman Site Applicant: Independent Development Company, LLC. Owner: Zelman Renton, LLC., c/o. Paul Casey File Number: LUA-098-100, SA-A, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. Project Location: NW corner of SW 43rd Street & Oakesdale Avenue SW Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Undeveloped Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 11,493 sq. ft. Site Area: 69,939 sq. ft. Total Building Area SF: 11,493 sq. ft. Win, 1\1 .I61413oRNwD HAP d) Foe i **4+DAA5r,z4NLE KENT-RENTON Eh36-23-4 351E ITE2 u....,nM,.� . 1 KoJEGT p ati go „� ,SITE.. t • ,.,.P y, L I N G T3N:NOI�TINERN N�4AC :1 S �, ( BUR 1 INDRSTP,AL DI$TR16T Pi0.1 IDIV.2 �I N ,. i z , L1. 1;;' I ' I g . ‘ - 4i Project Location Map SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envi ental Review Committee Staff Report • SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 2 of 14 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal is located within the Oakesdale Business Park which includes stormwater facilities for the entire development. Storm drainage for the subject development would be conveyed to the common facility which is located north of the subject site. The site plan indicates the two buildings on separate lots. At present the subject site is one lot, so a short plat would be required to separate the buildings on individual lots. The subject site and adjacent parcels south of Springbrook Creek were rezoned from Medium Industrial (IM) to Commercial Arterial (CA) in June 1998. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access is proposed from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The site is fairly level, with elevations ranging from 20 to 24 feet. The western 1/3 of the site is located approximately 4 feet higher than the eastern 2/3 of the site. The steepest slope on the site is approximately 4.4%. The geotechnical study was prepared by GN Northern, Inc. Subsurface conditions observed in test pits consisted of a 1 1/2 foot layer of top soil overlying native soils. The native soils consisted of approximately a 4 foot thick layer of loose to medium dense silty sand with minor clay and a trace of gravel, underlaid by soft to medium stiff silt. There were compressed peat layers in both test pits. The geotechnical report recommends that structural loads be supported on a deep-seated pile foundation which penetrates below the fill and loose native materials into the native bearing soil. The site would be graded to allow for positive drainage to the common stormwater facilities for the Oakesdale Business Park, located to the north of the site. The grading plan estimates approximately 560 cubic yards of cut and 950 cubic yards of fill for a net import of 390 cubic yards. The site has been recently cleared of vegetation which was done for the remediation of contaminants, permitted under a Consent Decree with the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) for the entire Oakesdale Business Park site. Erosion SITERC.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Env) rental Review Committee Staff Report • SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 3 of 14 could occur during the construction phase of the project. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan and prior to issuance of Construction Permits. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: NA 2) Air Impacts Impacts to air quality can be anticipated during construction and after completion of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) from disturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction equipment exhaust would have a minor impact on local air quality. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from customer and employee traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Overall air impacts would be relatively minor in nature and not considered significant to warrant special mitigation measures. The fueling system would include a stage II vapor recovery system to prevent fuel vapor from entering the atmosphere. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 3) Water Impacts There are no wetlands or surface waters identified on the subject site. Springbrook Creek is located approximately 350 feet north of the site and the proposal would not impact Springbrook Creek. Storm drainage for the proposal would be conveyed via a catch basin and storm pipe collection system to the common stormwater facility planned to serve the entire Oakesdale Business Park. The stormwater facility for the Oakesdale Business Park is under review by a separate land use permit application. Therefore, approval of the subject proposal should be contingent upon final approval of the stormwater facility. All the conveyance facilities on the subject site would be required to be sized in accordance with the City requirements and the standards of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Renton. A separate storm drain collection system would be provided underneath the fuel island canopy. Stormwater in this area would be directed to a trench drain and an oil/water separator prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. Stormwater sheet flow in the direction of the fuel island area would be collected in a trench drain and conveyed to the stormwater system to prevent stormwater runoff from entering the fuel island area. Mitigation Measures The stormwater facility for the Oakesdale Business Park Phase I shall receive construction permit approval prior to the issuance of building permits for the subject Seven-Eleven Zelman site project. Policy Nexus Environmental Ordinance SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envi ,ental Review Committee Staff Report • SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 4 of 14 4) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee applies to all new construction. The required mitigation fee is based on a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is tentatively estimated at $5,980. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $5,980. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 5) Transportation Impacts Access to the proposed development is from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW (approximately 240 feet north of the intersection) and one driveway off SW 43rd Street (approximately 170 feet west of the intersection). The driveways are sufficient distance from the intersection for safe turning movements. Plan Review staff have approved of the locations of the driveways. The proposal would result in an increase in traffic trips and therefore would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. Trip generation numbers are estimated from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The proposal is estimated to generate 719 new average daily trips. Therefore, the Traffic Mitigation Fee is estimated at $53,925 (719 trips x $75 = $53,925). The City is presently improving Oakesdale Avenue SW as a major north/south connection through the Valley. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Oakesdale Business Park by Entranco states that by the year 2010, operations at the SW 41st Street/Oakesdale Avenue SW intersection will deteriorate enough to warrant signalization. The applicant should contribute a fair share toward the cost of a new traffic signal at this intersection. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which states that the site is already graded and minimal hauling of soil materials is anticipated. The plan discusses transportation routes to the site and states that construction would be limited to between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. under the Development Guideline Ordinance. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $53,925 (719 trips x $75 = $53,925). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the intersection of SW 41st Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. The proportional share is estimated to be $1,494.87 and is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envi rental Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 5 of 14 5) Environmental Health Impacts : The are existing areas of contaminated soils on the subject site. These have been identified and remediation has been addressed under the Consent Decree with the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) for cleanup of the entire Oakesdale Business Park.. The proposal includes the installation of four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. The applicant has proposed mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts of fuel spills or accidents. The mitigations relate to safeguards designed into the underground tank system and dispensers, such as leak detectors, emergency shutoff valves, containment wells, etc. A separate permit from the Fire Prevention Bureau will be required for the installation of the underground tanks and piping. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 6) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts : The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and the proposed uses are allowed in the CA zoning designation. The proposed development is approximately 350 feet south of Springbrook Creek and therefore is outside of the regulated shoreline area of Springbrook Creek. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Env' rental Review Committee Staff Report • SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 6 of 14 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The stormwater facility for the Oakesdale Business Park Phase I shall receive construction permit approval prior to the issuance of building permits for the subject Seven-Eleven Zelman site project. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $5,980. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $53,925 (719 trips x $75 = $53,925). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the intersection of SW 41st Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. The proportional share is estimated to be $1,494.87 and is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envt ental Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 7 of 14 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the underground tank and piping installation. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. BUILDING 1. Geotech monitoring will be required. PLAN REVIEW STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Stormwater System Development Connection charge is $7,883.83 which, is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 2. Floor elevation of proposed building must be a minimum of 1 foot above the FEMA 100-year flood elevation. 3. Since the storm drainage pond is proposed to serve several lots there must be a maintenance and operations agreement between all properties proposing to use the joint facilities, similar to what was done for the Lind Corporate Park project. Jointly used facilities must also be located with easements that grant benefiting properties the right to use the facility. Submit documents for approval. 4. There are additional items to be aware of in the Plat Phase I review that will have indirect impact to this site as conditions of approval. SEWER (Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $5,445.24, which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 2. Floor elevations shown are 23.3 feet. A floor elevation below 25 feet will require a backflow prevention device. 3. On-site sewer line is to be labeled "Private." WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is $7,903.10, which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 2. A loop water system is required if the required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. Fire prevention indicates a required fire flow of 4,000 gpm. 3. Four(4) fire hydrants are required in accordance with the required fire flow per the Fire Prevention Department. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of each building, but not closer than 50-feet, and the secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of each building. 4. The loop water main is to be shown in a 15-foot utility easement. General: 1. Drawings to comply with City of Renton drafting standards. Parks Recommend extending landscape area to the back of curb on SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. Owner to maintain all improvements. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir ental Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 8 of 14 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION 1 This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Neighborhood Map, (Received June 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Site Plan (Received June 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Landscape Plan (Received June 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Preliminary Utility Plan (Received June 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Exterior Elevations (Received June 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, Floor Plan (Received June 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 8: Drawing No. 7, Storm Drainage and Grading (Received June 17, 1998). Exhibit No. 9: Drawing No. 8, Sign and Light Elevations (Received June 17, 1998). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4- 31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES; The site is designated Employment Area-Valley (EAV) in the Comprehensive Plan. The EAV designation intended to provide for a mixture of commercial, office and industrial uses. The proposed uses fall within the range of uses consistent with the designation. The proposal is consistent with the following applicable EAV policies: Policy LU-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. SITERC.DOC I City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir< ,ntal Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 9 of 14 Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. The following policies are intended to guide development in the EAV designation. Policy LU-212.19 Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. Policy LU-212.6 Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including: a. shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities and amenities; b. an improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; and c. an opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch facilities, express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not exist. Policy LU-291. Beautification and screening of parking lots should be encouraged through appropriate landscaping, fencing and berms. (Community Design policies) B. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS; The subject site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). Gas stations with mini-marts or convenience stores are allowed as a secondary use in the CA zone subject to the condition that the size and location be reviewed as part of the site plan approval. Setbacks - The CA zone requires a front/street setback of a minimum of 10 feet. This setback abutting public streets must be landscaped. The proposed site plan complies with this provision. There is no side or rear yard setback requirement in the CA zone. The specialty retail building is proposed adjacent to the west, side property line. Height - The CA zone allows a maximum building height of 50 feet. The proposed building height is approximately 19 feet, complying with the height limits of the CA zone. Lot Coverage - The CA zone allows up to 65% lot coverage for buildings. The total of the building footprints is 11,493 square feet, equal to a lot coverage of approximately 16%. Landscaping - The CA zone requires a 10 foot landscape strip for lots abutting public streets. The site plan complies with this requirement. The Parking Code requires a minimum of 5% of a large parking area (over 10,000 square feet) to be provided as interior parking lot landscaping. The proposal includes a landscape area separating the gas station/convenience store from the commercial retail building that appears to meet the standard. The applicant should verify compliance with this provision. The subject site is within the Green River Valley Planning area. An environmental mitigation agreement between the City and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) requires that 2% of a site area be provided as a natural landscape area for wildlife habitat. This requirement has been satisfied for properties located in the Oakesdale Business Park with the enhancement of the Springbrook Creek stream buffer. The code requires a pedestrian connection between the public entrance and the street. The site plan includes a crosswalk connection to the sidewalk along Oakesdale Avenue SW, but SITERC.DOC I City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envin ntal Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 10 of 14 the crosswalk terminates at the property line along SW 43rd Street. The applicant should revise the site plan to extend the crosswalk or sidewalk connection across the right-of-way to the sidewalk along SW 43 Street. Parking - The Parking Code requires a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet for retail stores. The proposal includes a total of 11,493 square feet of building area and 58 parking spaces which equals a ratio of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. C. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The proposal would not adversely impact surrounding properties and uses. The proposed gas station, convenience store and retail building is located in an area that is presently developed and further developing with a mix of commercial, office park, and industrial warehouse/ distribution uses. The project site is located along two arterials: SW 43rd Street is a major east/west commercial arterial and the City is improving Oakesdale Avenue SW as a north/south connection through the Valley. Thus, the proposed commercial uses would serve the auto traffic existing and anticipated on these routes, which is the overall intent of the underlying Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation.. There is a street right-of-way, approximately 20 feet wide, between the property line and the back of the existing curb on both SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. There are no plans to improve the street rights-of-way at this time. To maintain a consistent streetscape appearance, the applicant should landscape the right-of-way area along both streets with lawn and street trees. The applicant should also be responsible for maintaining the landscape strip. D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. The site has been cleared and graded for development under the Consent Decree for the cleanup of soil contaminants on the Oakesdale Business Park property. There are no significant natural features which would be impacted by development. The subject site is located south of Springbrook Creek (approximately 350 feet) and would not impact the creek. Construction activities related to the proposed development would be required to utilize best management practices which would reduce potential construction impacts on the site. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The subject proposal would develop a commercial use on vacant property in an area that is transitioning to include a greater mix of commercial uses with the predominant industrial uses. Development of the site is anticipated to conserve property values in the vicinity. F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; Access to the proposed development is from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW (approximately 240 feet north of the intersection) and one driveway off SW 43rd Street (approximately 170 feet west of the intersection). The driveways are sufficient distance from the intersection for safe turning movements. Plan Review staff have approved of the locations of the driveways. The driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW is on the north property line and is planned as a shared access with the parcel to the north. The one driveway off SW 43rd Street would be shared between the 2 buildings proposed on the site, the gas station/convenience store and the specialty retail building. The shared driveways would minimize the number of SITERC DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& Envirc ntal Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 11 of 14 curb cuts which is desirable along the major arterials. Transportation staff has not identified adverse impacts to the local road system. The site plan includes painted crosswalks connecting the gas station/convenience store to both SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. The specialty retail building has a direct connection to the sidewalk along SW 43rd Street. The on-site vehicle and pedestrian circulation is designed to be safe and efficient. G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed buildings are sufficiently setback from property boundaries to allow for adequate light and air circulation to the building. H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; The proposed development is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. Noise, dust, and odors which may result with construction of the project would be mitigated through measures described in the Construction Mitigation Plan and with best management practices. The proposal includes the installation of four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. The applicant has proposed mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts of fuel spills or accidents. The mitigations relate to safeguards designed into the underground tank system and dispensers, such as leak detectors, emergency shutoff valves, containment wells, etc. A separate permit from the Fire Prevention Bureau will be required for the installation of the underground tanks and piping. 1. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND The project site is adequately served by utilities and roads. The applicant will be responsible for extension of utilities on-site to serve the proposed buildings. See the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information concerning utilities and public services. J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight by improving an undeveloped site in an active industrial/commercial area. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval& Envirc ntal Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 12 of]4 X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for development of the Seven-Eleven Zelman site. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 9. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area Valley (EAV). 5) Zoning: The site plan as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Undeveloped, Springbrook Creek, future industrial warehouse development; East: Boeing, industrial; South: Springbrook Business Park; and West: Undeveloped. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley (EAV); and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial (CA). 3) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues are addressed in the body of this report. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir< ntal Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21, 1998 Page 13 of 14 F. Decision The Site Plan for the Seven-Eleven Zelman Site, File No. LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall landscape the right-of-way along both SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW from the back of the curb to the property line. The landscape strip shall include lawn and street trees. The owner shall also be responsible for maintenance of the landscape strip. A revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the site plan to provide a pedestrian connection between the public entrance of the building and the sidewalk along SW 43rd Street, extending the proposed crosswalk across the street right-of-way. The revised site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: 72/4"pev,,<- 7-21— J es C. Hanson, Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 22st day of July, 1998 to the applicant and owner: Paul Casey Zelman Renton LLC. 707 Wilshire Blvd Suite 3036 Los Angeles, CA. 90017 Richard Gumpert Independent Development Company, LLC. 742 First Street South Kirkland, WA. 98033 TRANSMITTED 22st day of July, 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling, Building Official Art Larson, Fire Marshal Neil Watts, Public Works Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envirc ntal Review Committee Staff Report SEVEN-ELEVEN ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 21. 1998 Page 14 of 14 Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 10, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. SITERC.DOC .; CITYOF..RENTON CURRENT PLANNING V.I$IQN AFF(DAVlT (yF<SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2i'lb day of 3uL , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERG cie1ermttn z t fl\s documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) S3vid.*_ '•• SadaPrcr' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that elf}-r - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tt6 uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (� 19 9`�/�•-�!i( Notary Publi in and for the State of ashington Notary (Print) My appointment eM ARILYN KeaKfLi I EFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 Project Name: Seven _G`euevl I-Leto/v(3,x Silt. Project Number: Loy qg_ 10o I Sw_lA NOTARY.DOC CIT' OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 23, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on July 21, 1998. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED 7-11/ZELMAN SITE • LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Proposal to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage to nks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. Location NW corner of SW 43rd Street & Oakesdale Avenue SW. Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 10, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGNCYLTRDOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • : CIT"c OF RENTON •..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 23, 1998 Ms. Karen Wallace RHL Design Group 1550- 140th Avenue NE#100 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: 7-11/Zelman Site Project No. LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Wallace: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on July 21, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 10, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Zelman Renton, LLC/Owners Independent Development Company, LLC Enclosure DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Independent Development Company, LLC PROJECT NAME: 7-11 /Zelman Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NW corner of SW 43rd Street & Oakesdale Avenue SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The stormwater facility for the Oakesdale Business Park Phase I shall receive construction permit approval prior to the issuance of building permits for the subject Seven-Eleven Zelman site project. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $5,980. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $53,925 (719 trips x $75 = $53,925). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the intersection of SW 41st Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. The proportional share is estimated to be $1,494.87 and is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The Site Plan for the Seven-Eleven Zelman Site, File No. LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall landscape the right-of-way along both SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW from the back of the curb to the property line. The landscape strip shall include lawn and street trees. The owner shall also be responsible for maintenance of the landscape strip. A revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Independent Development Company, LLC PROJECT NAME: 7-11 /Zelman Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NW corner of SW 43rd Street & Oakesdale Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the underground tank and piping installation. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. BUILDING 1. Geotech monitoring will be required. PLAN REVIEW STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Stormwater System Development Connection charge is $7,883.83 which, is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 2. Floor elevation of proposed building must be a minimum of 1 foot above the FEMA 100-year flood elevation. 3. Since the storm drainage pond is proposed to serve several lots there must be a maintenance and operations agreement between all properties proposing to use the joint facilities, similar to what was done for the Lind Corporate Park project. Jointly used facilities must also be located with easements that grant benefiting properties the right to use the facility. Submit documents for approval. 4. There are additional items to be aware of in the Plat Phase I review that will have indirect impact to this site as conditions of approval. SEWER (Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $5,445.24, which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 7-11/Zelman Site LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) 2. Floor elevations shown are 23.3 feet. A floor elevation below 25 feet will require a backflow prevention device. 3. On-site sewer line is to be labeled "Private." WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is $7,903.10, which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 2. A loop water system is required if the required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. Fire prevention indicates a required fire flow of 4,000 gpm. 3. Four(4) fire hydrants are required in accordance with the required fire flow per the Fire Prevention Department. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of each building, but not closer than 50- feet, and the secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of each building. 4. The loop water main is to be shown in a 15-foot utility easement. General: 1. Drawings to comply with City of Renton drafting standards. PARKS Recommend extending landscape area to the back of curb on SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. Owner to maintain all improvements. r CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Independent Development Company, LLC PROJECT NAME: 7-11 /Zelman Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NW corner of SW 43rd Street& Oakesdale Avenue SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 10, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: July 27, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: July 21, 1998 SIGNATURES: Pregg iil erm d inistrator DAT Departme of anning/Building/Public Works 4,1/fi: Jim e her Administrator SAT P /, Community Services l/ lam- z//Fr Le Wheeler, Fire hief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Independent Development Company, LLC PROJECT NAME: 7-11 /Zelman Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NW corner of SW 43rd Street & Oakesdale Avenue SW MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The stormwater facility for the Oakesdale Business Park Phase I shall receive construction permit approval prior to the issuance of building permits for the subject Seven-Eleven Zelman site project. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $5,980. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated at $53,925 (719 trips x $75 = $53,925). This fee is payable prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the intersection of SW 41st Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. The proportional share is estimated to be $1,494.87 and is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The Site Plan for the Seven-Eleven Zelman Site, File No. LUA-98-100, SA-A, ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall landscape the right-of-way along both SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW from the back of the curb to the property line. The landscape strip shall include lawn and street trees. The owner shall also be responsible for maintenance of the landscape strip. A revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall either reduce the width of the two driveways to 30 feet or receive approval of a modification from the Parking Code standard. Request for deviations from the Parking Code may be approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator. Parking Code Section 4-14-1.C.a. lists criteria that the applicant should address in requesting a deviation from the driveway width standard. The applicant shall either receive approval of the modification or revise the driveway width to the 30 foot wide Parking Code standard, prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: Independent Development Company, LLC PROJECT NAME: 7-11 /Zelman Site DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: NW corner of SW 43rd Street & Oakesdale Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow is 4000 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the underground tank and piping installation. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. BUILDING 1. Geotech monitoring will be required. PLAN REVIEW STORM DRAINAGE: 1. The Stormwater System Development Connection charge is $7,883.83 which, is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 2. Floor elevation of proposed building must be a minimum of 1 foot above the FEMA 100-year flood elevation. 3. Since the storm drainage pond is proposed to serve several lots there must be a maintenance and operations agreement between all properties proposing to use the joint facilities, similar to what was done for the Lind Corporate Park project. Jointly used facilities must also be located with easements that grant benefiting properties the right to use the facility. Submit documents for approval. 4. There are additional items to be aware of in the Plat Phase I review that will have indirect impact to this site as conditions of approval. SEWER (Waste Water): 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $5,445.24, which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 7-11/Zelman Site LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) 2. Floor elevations shown are 23.3 feet. A floor elevation below 25 feet will require a backflow prevention device. 3. On-site sewer line is to be labeled "Private." WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is$7,903.10, which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business Park. 2. A loop water system is required if the required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. Fire prevention indicates a required fire flow of 4,000 gpm. 3. Four(4) fire hydrants are required in accordance with the required fire flow per the Fire Prevention Department. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of each building, but not closer than 50- feet, and the secondary hydrants must be within 300-feet of each building. 4. The loop water main is to be shown in a 15-foot utility easement. General: 1. Drawings to comply with City of Renton drafting standards. PARKS Recommend extending landscape area to the back of curb on SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. Owner to maintain all improvements. a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal RENTON,WASHINGTON newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language Significance - Mitigated for the following continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County project under the authority of the Renton Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Municipal Code. 7-11/ZELMAN SITE State of Washington for King County. LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Environmental review for construction of Journal not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers a convenience store,sSti commercial eight retail (andPP g Y building and gas Station with eig fuel during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a islands. Location: NW corner of SW 43rd St.& Oakesdale Ave.SW. Appeals of the environmental determina- 7/112elman Site tion (RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11- 680) must be filed in writing on or before as published on: 7/27/98 are5:0eals 0 fil d byM g this date, the actioust 10, 1998. If no n will become final.Appeals must be filed in writ- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $48.08 ing together with the required$75.00 appli- cation fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Legal Number 4961 f'l Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, j WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are . % governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional informa- tion regarding the appeal process may be e e South oumal obtained from the Renton City Clerk's g Office,(425)-235-2501. Publication Date: July 27, 1998 (� (- Published in the South County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this day ofAL1-r -, 19 cd July 27, 1998.4961 N01III I I1 i/0,/ ( , /` A' . 914101 . ./ ,s' -. .,'.ii Notary Public of the State of Washington / r_:`, i v,o� r.; . : residing in Renton —o— = King County, Washington • .. • ,•; cue oc, o..' -,�;- .,c2n 20..•„LC)$ • /if °F W A S N```v``� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. 7-11/ZELMAN SITE LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Environmental review for construction of a convenience store, a commercial retail building and gas station with eight fuel islands. Location: NW corner of SW 43rd St. & Oakesdale Ave. SW. Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 10, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. Publication Date: July 27, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • ENVIROz1i�JIENTAL DETER1iiiNA T ION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONP.IENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: 7-11/ZII.MAN SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-to0,SA-A,ECF Proposal to construct a-7.11'convenience store(3,000 square feel),a commercial retell building(8.500 square feet),and a gas station with eight fuel islands,four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage to nks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from ono driveway off Cakesdale Avenue OW and one driveway ott SW 43rd Street.Location:NW corner of • SW 43id Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENV'RONMEHTAL REVIEW CCSIMITTEP (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AL,oit SE livlr•ACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental.:cterrn:.lati•n IRCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11.680]must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August.0.1998.If no appeals are Fled by this data,the action will become final.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the requl.ad$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B.Additional infomtation regarding the appeal process may be obtained From the Rcnlon City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. • EI Y13cRFlmr:rum, eesr-eenTON r.xn-351E sib= / � FOR FURTHER INI=ORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE T1;1S NOTICE Wi'i HCUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ��L�- 2 / r . Signed: ��- ATTEST: Subcribed and.sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing Itf i4 7) ,on the �/1� day of�� /Gi' 77 CZAS' MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6rawao il„„„ r\to tolEj ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: 7-11/Z_LMAN SITE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Proposal to construct a"7-11"convenience store(3,000 square feet),a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet),and a gas station with eight fuel islands,four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage to nks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdaie Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. Location: NW corner of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdaie Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 10, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date,the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are • governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. HEI61+'3c.HAD map foe1214 op.mt,paz e.-..M KENT-RENTON EA36 23. 351E lIn ,e —�j r ..- srtm �P P vi' .. . .�.. �. sue. f P — BURLIR6 •c0"IPLOKJ•VD[PS_J a •,I tv,�rt e.I1'- 44 6TRICT O.I DI V.'t I, Ill \ " i MUM FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE TI s'S NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORI s ION rmillillease include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. ' L DESIGN GROUP INC. ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1550 140th Ave. N.E., Suite 100, Bellevue, WA 98005-4516 Telephone: (425) 746-4677 Facsimile: (425) 746-6836 JAMES E. PRESTEN July16, 1998 Established 1966 Regional Manager Associate Mr. Peter Rosen Associate Planner b VELOPMENT PLANNING City of Renton CITY OF RENTON JOHN W. JOHNSON 1055 S. GradyWay Architect JUL 1 7 1998 Co-President Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED RE: Site Review for 7-Eleven Site B R I A N F. Z I TA For Independent Development Co. Architect Co-President At 43`1 & Oakesdale,Renton,WA Dear Mr. Rosen; JOHN B. HICKS Architect The following is our response to your questions concerning mitigation measures as it relates to Vice President the fueling portions of this project. We will address construction as well as the finished product. C E C I L R. SPENCER Construction: Architect 1. The tank excavation will be performed in a matter that recognizes the hazards Vice President associated with excavating a large area. The area will be cordon off to warn of the dangers during excavation and installation of the tanks. 2. Should the actual soil conditions, once observed during the excavation, be such B RU C E J. G R E E N F I E L D that shoring or dewatering is required this will be implemented. Managing Architect 3. All piping and other components will be pressure tested prior to finalizing the Associate system to ensure that there is no breach in the system. Final Product H O W A R D G. K I M U R A 1. The tanks will have"deadman"(concrete logs) logs placed on either side and the Architect tanks and strapped to the tanks to assist in securing the tanks in the ground and Associate prevent any lifting of tanks that may occur. 2. The tanks are to be fiberglass,double wall construction. The interstitial space (space between the tank walls)will be monitored to detect any leaks that may C H R I S L A W T O N occur. Regional Manager 3. The fill ports will have containment wells at each port,which will contain any Associate potential spills due to over filling or spilling during the filling of the tanks. 4. The dispensers will have containment wells below to contain any potential leakage at the piping joints going to the dispenser mechanisms. 5. The piping is double wall,and will have continuous positive drainage back to the GARY M. SEMLING Managing Architect storage tanks. Associate 6. The fueling system will have a stage II vapor recovery system to prevent fuel vapor from entering the atmosphere. BLYTHE R.WILSON Managing Architect Associate LA H A B R A, C A P E T A L U M A, C A S A C R A M E N T O, C A S C O T T S D A L E, AZ ' L DESIGN GROUP INC. 7. The tanks will have vent piping from each tank,which shall run to a landscape island for venting to the atmosphere. 8. Leak detectors shall be integrated into the various fuel systems(ie: at tank pumps, fuel tanks etc.)to assist in preventing fuel from entering the environment. 9. Storm Drainage/runoff from the fuel island/canopy slab will run into an oil/water separator prior to entering the storm water/sewer system to assist in cleaning any runoff. 10. All fuel dispensers shall have emergency shutoff switches located away from the dispensers and meeting all codes to afford a method to quickly shut the fueling system down should there be an emergency requiring this action. Please do not hesitate to call if you or another party has any questions during your review. Sincerely, RHL Desi Gr Inc. John trobel Architect/Project Manager LA H A B R A, CA P E T A L U M A, CA S A C R A M E N T O, CA S C O T T S D A L E, A Z City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pcAtc,e. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Independent Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: 7-11 /Zelman Site WORK ORDER NO: 78400 LOCATION: NW corner of SW 43rd Street& Oakesdale Avenue SW SITE AREA: 69,939 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a Seven-Eleven convenience store(3,000 sq.ft.), a commercial retail building (8,500 sq.ft.), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable ,Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shorelinenimals Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Estimate 3 police calls for service annually,based on the size of the building. Actual number of calls are estimated to be much higher, due to the nature of the business . In order to help prevent commercial burglary during the construction phase, recommend that the business be fenced in with security fencing, all building materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use, and security lighting will need to be provided on the site. Typical crime problems received by this type of business are: Gas-drive-offs , Commercial B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Robbery and Shoplifting. To help prevent gas thefts , the gas pumps will need to be either pay-first (at the register) or pre-pay at the pump. To help prevent Robbery, refer to the attached Washington Administrative Code for Late Night Worker's Retail Crime Prevention. The police department provides free robbery and shoplifting prevention training to businesses , on request. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si ature of Director or Auth rized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 Part A-3 LATE NIGHT RETAIL WORKERS CRIME PROTECTION w.AC 296-24-102 Scope and application. 296-2 4-1 0203 General Requirements. WAC 296-24-102 Scope and application. Application of this section is limited to retail establishments operating between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. with the exception of restaurants, hotels, taverns, or any lodging facil- ity. [Statutory Authority: Chapter 49.17 RCW. 90-03-029 (Order 89-20). § 296-24—IO2. filed I/I I/90. effective 2;26/90.) WAC 296-24-10203 General requirements. (I) All employers operating late night retail establishments shall pro- vide crime prevention training to their employees. (2) Crime prevention training shall be a part of the accident prevention program requirements imposed pursuant to WAC 296-24-040. (3) The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of robbery and violence prevention are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for their safety have been provided. The em- ployer shall: (a) Provide training and training materials that outline security policies, safety and security procedures, and per- sonal safety and crime avoidance techniques. (b) Provide formal instruction through a training seminar or training video presentation and upon completion re- quire the employee to sign off on the date, time, and place of training. The training documentation will be placed in the employee's personnel file. The following elements shall be included in the crime prevention training program: (i) An explanation of the importance of keeping the store clean, neat, and uncluttered thereby making it as unat- tractive as possible to robbers. (ii) Provide explanation of the purpose of maintaining an unobstructed view of the cash register from outside the store, provided the cash register is located in a position visible from the street. (iii) Provide instruction on reasons for operating only minimum number of cash registers at night. (iv) Keeping the cash register fund to a minimum. (v) Taking extra precautions after dark, i.e., keep alert, observe lighting and dark corners, spot possible hiding places. (vi) Violence prevention procedures in case of robbery. (vii) Provide a refresher course on crime prevention on or near the employee's anniversary date. Videotape and crime prevention material shall be available for employee's review at their request. (4) In addition to providing crime prevention training as defined in this section, all employers operating late night retail establishments shall: (a) Post a conspicuous sign in the window or door which states that there is a safe on the premises and it is not ac- cessible to the employees on the premises and that the cash register contains only the minimal amount of cash needed to conduct business: No employer shall be subject to citation and penalty for having moneys in the cash register in excess of the minimal amount needed to conduct business. (b) All displays, and any other material posted in window(s) or door(s) should be arranged so as to provide a clear and unobstructed view of the cash register; provided the cash register is located in such a position so as to be visible from the street. (c) Have a drop—safe, limited access safe, or comparable device on the premises. (d) Operate the outside lights for that portion of the approach and parking area that is necessary to accommodate customers during all night hours the late night retail establishment is open. This may be accomplished through: (i) Surveillance lighting — to detect and observe pedestrian and vehicular entrances. (ii) Providing adequate illuminances — adequate illuminance throughout the pedestrian and vehicular entrance areas should be a minimum of one foot candle to comply with ANSI/1ES RP7-1983. [Statutory Authority: Chapter 49.17 RCW. 90-03-029 (Order 89-20), § 296-24-10203, filed 1/1 1/90, effective 2/26/90.) 122,'26/90) (C1 2%-2I WAC(Part A-3) —p I( City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ebhs'ta1e.v\ h11GC8 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Independent Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen �_ PROJECT TITLE: 7-11 /Zelman Site WORK ORDER NO: 78400 ,� LOCATION: NW corner of SW 43rd Street& Oakesdale Avenue SW 6 �//!, + �', *- SITE AREA: 69,939 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): `�' N ti i SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a Seven-Eleven convenience store(3,000 sq.ft.), airommercialretail building (8,500 sq.ft.), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Aventig§W and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. 'OA, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LancVShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS , ` 1 v r Pc H. I"1 o IL)1 reqe,i i--)c7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -p,...„.. ..,4_, Signature of Director or Aut oriized Represen(ati Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:-T rja.-t`rvx COMMENTS DUE: JULY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Independent Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen 41a.� PROJECT TITLE: 7-11 /Zelman Site WORK ORDER NO: 78400 •NN LOCATION: NW corner of SW 43rd Street&Oakesdale Avenue SW —1 �` SITE AREA: 69,939 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): ``414 �`�?A9 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a Seven-Eleven convenience store (3,000 sq.ft.), a comrnprcial retail building (8,500 sq.ft.), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Si f L° `t we-44? B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS a' I 0 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 7 l b Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • OAKESDALE 7-ELEVEN & SPECIALTY RETAIL STORE SW 43rd St. & Oakesdale Ave. SW EIS Review Development Services July 6, 1998 TRANSPORTATION: 1. The transportation mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. The total estimated trips per the ITE Trip Generation Manual allowing for pass-by trip is 719 new trips. Therefore: $75 x 719=$53,962.50. (See attachment for method of calculation.) 2. The off-site improvement fee proportional share for a traffic signal at the intersection of Oakesdale Ave. SW & SW 41st St. Is $1,494.87. (See attachment for method of calculation.) 3. Drawings to comply with City of Renton drafting standards. • 98cm104T • 98CM 104T.DOC\ 1 a s' 5 S sec ) C - I t ,7 4o C_o vi V ei,---, G ,e , ors r-t,: 1 -- t 9 25 ( y :�":3.> _._._ 24 4 3 'Qe 7 --, I' I✓il�.56 % 4p G 7 -_ . --i'r P ,;O% 3it6 I 1 3 IYl 1), • ter: In Vei.\- +f . I' x 73, 5 - /g 7"r/P,s(P 4) t .a ! g 6 LI 1-1Z co ver-d-uY\ `7;,•1 r.,s Y, /vim%, �� 71 Pass; --� r -� '.7-_.., PeL , Z[f1 I`2�fa, I `344Ca Tc,fa( Tr-IPs Leer,., v c c., 17 4- %-. 1. `( & 1 o ¢-.a/ `7"-,ps s .. _v ( As A. 3 a_. 5 ' i-e 7;6/ 71r;p5 1 1 /2— To*z1. 2 P�. °�5 � i Trl p S • h -7 / 7 No. t..4.) z),,e_d7 i 7. r i, 5 b l • • • • . o h ft•9ts�a�;(.4.-d h.,r .41 <.., " ,m orb, cn S -- �,M��,�� �8 •L L .SLX Aids'4 id4 'a.. (2...9/05-. • is/ Mf • s off alc1a4I 4- — 2 '5A / _ 6'09 ? 6'0 / � sd ,S4 I y = t5e� 2 �_�,,� I, 5cS'Ay ,-fq ,mad (44) OGa1. o o 'EL- X F�b2 S ' h 621 -- ��1. ( l I -Z. _. -reel a r A c 7 • • cr cif s a t, A-4ad d p o,-,l/ r �q-Sstd o x off X o ' 14r E 1 Q �B 1 sb/ off _c 9s Ae,-used � a�� r,t�-art� �dS City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Suel Wi-teurta.“, COMMENTS DUE: JULY 6, 1998 �'oF�E;,,f APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Independent Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen JUN 2 4 1998 PROJECT TITLE: 7-11 /Zelman Site WORK ORDER NO: 78400 44VILVIrvit to LOCATION: NW corner of SW 43rd Street&Oakesdale Avenue SW V�V���DN SITE AREA: 69,939 sq.ft. J BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a Seven-Eleven convenience store(3,000 sq.ft.), a commercial retail building (8,500 sq.ft.), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoricJCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet rh F p�-dJ c,� 1IW ac./-s .7 .17e, ,7 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS a-lt C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • OAKESDALE 7-ELEVEN & SPECIALTY RETAIL STORE SW 43rd St. & Oakesdale Ave. SW EIS Review Development Services July 6, 1998 SEWER: 1. The Sewer System Development Connection Charge is $5,455.24 which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business campus. 2. Floor elevations shown is 23.3 Ft. A floor elevation below 25 Ft. Will require a backflow prevention device. 3. . On site sewer line to be labeled "Private". STORM(Surface Water): 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $7,883.83 which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business campus. 2. Floor elevation of proposed buildings must be a minimum of 1-ft. above the Fema 100-year flood elevation. 3. Since the storm drainage pond is proposed to serve several lots there must be a maintenance and operations agreement between all properties proposing to use the joint facilities similar to what was done for our Lind Corporate Park Project. Jointly used facilities must also be located with 3, easements that grant benefiting properties the right to use the facility. Submit documents for approval. 4. There are additional items to be aware of in the Plat Phase (I) review that will have indirect impact to this site as condition of approval. • • 98cm104S • • 98CM104S.DOC\ • PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW # 98 —0 Z 2 111 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 • � OTHER APPLICANT: Ricw,gi (;;ANt pe2 - RECEIVED FROM C M G( JOB ADDRESS: SW y3cr S?- ,- Ogk6S9w[.€ AvK Sul WO# a e) NATURE OF WORK: 7-1 r/cp ei ' 72t'Ti9i . GREEN# el SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER ❑ VESTED 0 NOT VESTED SC-:Gkt A--j ON Pt3 Cc,wJgrAlpy, 1 ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review a dated . 1 0 PARENT PIDM(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# 3 L 23 b y-q v VS- ❑ King Co.Tax Acct//(new) It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site • and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. _ NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt) WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER 'AV/ 34' FF $(a.ZV---G E• D Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District * Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER /1 OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prey. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 01 Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $850/unit x Mobile home dwelli ! unit$680/unit in park E TY-6,4 EeLyyec L;...- . IS 4, - : c7 t-r 4 aid A.artment Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x A ,Q ij --I0,v (.4..)/4/a / '45 Nor Occur-4e,, Commercial/Industrial $0.113/s.. ft. of t ro t ert (not less than$850.00)x 6 9 5 9 tl) ' 7 ' • , O Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter a,soo ceM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ® '' EE te&'JJE-60 4k-99—6 ZS f1-PPuu�-S ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partiall Pd (Ltd Exem t tion) t l Never Pd /, Eck& 7- 77y 5' ,,6,Q,4- iit) Si :le famil residential dwelli • unit$585/unit x .C /Vpr-- Co.-'-' ��7-&—j) Rero2 7-' Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x 40p r( '770N Y)5 Pc-72r2•i /7— At. ■ 11 •t t t t t •. I! t• t t •t 1 t I : .t t:. Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property (not less than$585.00)x C,cj, 939 • S'S ;Z.V REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) lil Never Pd Si _le famil residential and mobile home dwellin. unit$385/unit x • All other properties $0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) (o/)115 ' Sigg 3 . 3 j - �/9e- PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ Signature of Reviewi g Authority DATE ft on *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. 4I **The square footage figures used arc taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. c:/templatc/feeapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord. Nos. 4506,4507,4508, 4525,and 4526 co 4 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Plate Re.t °It) COMMENTS DUE: JULY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Independent Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: 7-11 /Zelman Site WORK ORDER NO: 78400 LOCATION: NW corner of SW 43rd Street &Oakesdale Avenue SW SITE AREA: 69,939 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a Seven-Eleven convenience store(3,000 sq.ft.), a commercial retail building (8,500 sq.ft.), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water • Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet l he, jo r-ofe� f i7npaG f f 4,i 7 he. /77 pp.), Sf f e B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS S - lta C.h C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 4?)210r * aJI ? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Data DEVA PP.DOC Rev.10/93 • OAKESDALE 7-ELEVEN & SPECIALTY RETAIL STORE SW 43rd St. &Oakesdale Ave. SW EIS Review Development Services July 6, 1998 WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection Charge is $7,903.10, which is a proportional or segregated amount of the estimated fee for all of Phase I of Oakesdale Business campus. 2. A loop water system is required if the required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. Fire Prevention indicates a required fire flow of 4,000 gpm. 3. Four(4) fire hydrants is required in accordance with the required fire flow per the Fire Prevention Department. The primary hydrants must be within 150-feet of each building, but not closer than 50-feet and the secondary hydrants to be within 300-feet of each building. 4. The loop water main to be shown in a 15-foot utility easement. 98cm104W 98CM 104W.DOC\ PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW # 98 -0 7 2 "EU DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 OTHER APPLICANT: RicygQ p 6 IA Ai pc--1 r RECEIVED FROM CAI G/ JOB ADDRESS: .ct ) y3't fir. Oaw�s9Frt� Ave SLA) WO# (ddaa e) NATURE OF WORK: 7-j i/cpct gay RC-rgtL GREEN# El SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 40 OTHER ❑ VESTED 0 NOT VESTED SCGRt 0A-7'1 t9/✓ Da Cu stilt-Aj/'i1 ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated . • ❑ PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# 3 623 (Pi-q 0'I 0 King Co.Tax Accta(new) It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees arc potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site • and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt) WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER 74101 - 3 y FC Y/1.ZS.s,/f-'F T. E, D Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District • Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park ( 'fw E�''A- .e.w.A---er/S 14-4E R,G Q7) cepO J Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x AS aPc=G . p,v C014 t- /,"3 Not O 'Curs?, Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft. of property (not less than$850.00)X 6 9, 9?9 S' 7 9O3 dO Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2.soo GPM threshold) • SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER t-. W 9,9-o z S 4- ',"u 3 ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ll Never Pd /pv 7/- F-c1 --t.,/r 1 SCCie�G.4'7ZnA), Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x j.C t/c r- C©.-,-,iciL&-- EZ, 1,eio2 r 29 Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x A1°PL it...( 77ON i 3 oa�-�r4-, /,Tc Apartment, Condo $350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property (not less than$585.00)x 6 9) 9 39 ) $' S y_5c- 2-V REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees_ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 11 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) 6 i/I /s" ''7Fg 3 , T(.3 �'- PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ /ems- (/3 %/9g Signature of Reviewi p g Authority DATE o0 *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. 1 **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. • ro catcmptete/feeappitgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord. Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525, and 4526 S, tx, eta City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F� ue-t1�-1\ COMMENTS DUE: DULY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 23, 19 I UN FIHIf 1 _. Do�uGp1T rim� RLI Li APPLICANT: Independent Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: 7-11 /Zelman Site WORK ORDER NO: 78400 :JN 2 1998 LOCATION: NW corner of SW 43rd Street&Oakesdale Avenue SW I V l SITE AREA: 69,939 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a Seven-Eleven convenience store(3,000 sq.ft.), a commercial retail building (8,500 sq.ft.), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet �o /Oli o r ).puts /00 fe / B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTSj 4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS l See Q //ac Cj cte, ednin,t..cki, ` We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona information is _-ded to properly assess this proposal. aeraAo Signature of irector or Authorized R presentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 (/ YO \\ +l , CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU - NTO MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 1998 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal c l SUBJECT: 7- Eleven / Zelman Project, SW 43rd 85 Oakesdale AV. SW Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 4000 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the underground tank and piping installation. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. A fire mitigation fee of$4,420.00 is required for the retail building and $1560.00 for the convenience store ,based on $.52 a square foot of the buildings square footage. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1&yks COMMENTS DUE: JULY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Independent Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: 7-11 /Zelman Site WORK ORDER NO: 78400 LOCATION: NW corner of SW 43rd Street& Oakesdale Avenue SW SITE AREA: 69,939 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a Seven-Eleven convenience store(3,000 sq.ft.), a commercial retail building (8,500 sq.ft.), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Llght/Glare Plants Recreation LancvShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoricICultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /tee ������� k V , B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1:ie/(072 '1- 0/ r; -X n-)G 2 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /k) lege We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas ( where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / Signature o irector or A o ed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: teuelopv►'et$ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 6, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 23, 1998 APPLICANT: Independent Development Company PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: 7-11 /Zelman Site WORK ORDER NO: 78400 LOCATION: NW corner of SW 43rd Street& Oakesdale Avenue SW SITE AREA: 69,939 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a Seven-Eleven convenience store(3,000 sq.ft.), a commercial retail building (8,500 sq.ft.), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks, and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS .S I T I, t S (3 6 S I G.i\ Ter Z_otoe0 CAt• N o eouc I ssoU3 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where i ona in ' eded to properly assess this proposal. (03/6 Signatur Director or ythorized Representative Date DEVAPP. J Rev 10193 206-277-4455 RENTON DEU SUCS/PLRN 995 P01 JUN 11 '98 15:27 .I .,.y .,t.,:„.>-,;, 1.e.i•}.,.7.�4 S" I'Iy.y.t... s:4,A;, 4.. 7 4 C. ; > M ,V<'''' ,{ SL'r'l V.S " S S''Y•.Y.'6 i I YS/•t-..L ..1%). ki?>„ .A.,t,,. kS a tF y„ ,i s s •�y VgP 4v . !''4 rseti,* Y '?.. { a..: • �.k,ir v:t.k",4.M' � vL, }vs' i wt,:fv v et`9frW r"!{'%:;�?{ �ir {'{� �� it },s �.�.4�� s',',Y�+:i'l��`S�"�i",!�i t •f<<5 s.v� st y� y 1i 4,�si S 4:�„ ii .s. �s's. ,�i� f�?t�eY k• n s -.?ik rr'u� *; tits s s.�"s'L.vt;r.. ).sr. tsd. y ��'k>{L a r� r r 6f?�•%•sqr. ;p 'ri`.r s s?5•`�1 `i•�;�+r'?' .4.'.Y';ii tiy?q y;v s: tivi,:N:. .: 4 p.s.-.. nt ? hw W,i s i .,.o 4 '-! 1�, .W f !ru e}s r r-c`i,,... N`srya,'�..,,,,:t.,,,,,:,nii yi„k'•t' ! 1, W.��1, ,..t. ,14 v.y ?Ni .. r yt,sf' yi' .*.1): 4 f's I '.`"�' ., S ,,• V, fys f.', (4OrkikN.' ( ,i''i4,y ?¢i '!l tis%Y �# ike?'.•i, r+r,, � syy itiYM Nf R� � Y v'v tL. �Ic rtis.�?bry. i" , �'� 'Vi. !,i r Y Sr ? + .,,>�.r4 i Y W> -k f V '�s..s.�+! s�•z�i,•'t,3„a�•.4 k. .i y.td:,.t?'.yL �'�!k}14'"�}evp�>v�S:' k v"r.s,t, as'v �s s t1,�•r. i i r } p' s}, ��c,,.i(.y tv s,i�.!�� r,•Villititi ?1i'�Yl' tt• .kr r;:�;..f"S�W:�•'e.y,. '(�,+y':•. `r/� (/�'�, ��lM �ti�l '�tr�;t Y�'Y( '.;'Y''r'a•"�s•�t,7,�i�i ,.Gi�.i,,s'?'i Yr.• 1' f �� � tea✓��Ili�w.���4 e r4!:st,Y;+f;�+ sry{ y �'; '!:ist t :7 }4' o /' g�V �h"' v�v kr' 4" ,,4 yy✓,Yiyr,s.4'y/!{!•,,a?4sL'i 4h,;!�'ri s1`sf>r? r4�yYr■�y ! {W/�)s ��Jy(,�]� ��n �,�.i. 'ii f y 1(� f3 w..,.,,..,( ,, %,w,r5:,,,. f'�.,„,„,s;s Lrr 1 i vv?I�r Sf i> 7 %Y si'h`ey95�1'�S?,yK?y!N 4:�r1,L/,. ,S>S`�.. • . .,.T1 5 RTI 1' '<. ♦•r.a141rJ 1i$ ..',..' Y4.'-1,.4.,'•• s.y.,,,. .,V ,{ 'ks;�4 kj . 1 ' `• iii I. �e — 1-e t- 'le t IMt.h S t u. PROJECT NAME: i APPLICATION NO: ija, Li)ft " (13 • 100 S il — A . The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division Will notify these individuals of the proposed development, NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER J) ----6-- G/iEZ L.i-6EL5 • . -, . 1 4 1 1 (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) 206-277-4455 RENTON DEV SVCS/PLAN 995 P02 JUN 11 '98 15:27 (Continued) ) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • A!-�rty�° P-. -l v L LS i ��Zei a P c- ICE. Cow Applicant Certification ��� ht' e_i 5/12/)-24KGe_, hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records ❑ Title Company Records tr Kin ounty Assessors Records /� 9kt"� A���st►,y ' Signe2 Date , ON'r�"tl ( pplicant) ) • ♦ ; y ;a. 9a�6n i NOTARY �.�� ."�. ATTESTED; Subscribed and sworn before.me, a Notary Public, in and for iht. tet�.o���Va �Qton, residing at (l; i ;� ,L�}� on the l day of �c�,.iE _�✓� 19 a- Signeddz k—TC/ �F 5. (Nola Publi �O t-tri5�D�G , I) M • • .�� ,�t l I ,`s 5,2xp ,� srk /p' l �y �� Y yy,ry,,, , r'gIRR{�, ,',''C'',,�, rt f%�ylr it r� sib yn xr nl+;'SSu n s i ni,x, t� tl,t '(7�' C�'�t)r'o flr•'r3 7*`Yt«r. 2. ,s.1:3�iuxW6 ::4, is krnfsIt rA,$)�X,/:?:„ k ,4x, v q is ,xtsto > +7s t ' *t• be r trN r� 77 s x:F : s n., n 7.Si k rCt';•,zk •)• xn., t +q, ',?f P r• k -tr)t i • .+ x k § W + 3;3' s / 1. ta,7u.43 t k'r�,`4 K,.!k:!l.: %k� u�, ': 11 (� ,xt tr ai}'u xr ;, rx T.� r <-,' svrC'ti /rI�p} .t ki.."n qx r:qu� r^r' rWxrt•rd t r,w/ r Skx•xx ' s F� e,luY liF�w" u r•7 rrl ' u ,et :r>t 1 I.�' .s• �,F s TAR.(4, i k� 01i41r1 ,,t sr�• +: n �1'trr 0,,,,w rkz; s ';jrut'thtlk't:�1', • 11 il- u� nn �' -x7 �S 4 z4 s r e, +'�' t ,ri ui >� w r 1 <> '1 x4 3)r,>,+, .i'x '7 t ' s W.r�9V +;<: t SKgnr :PrI�, s,r t i ,;3; Sy H p ? x u n:�• t'x-'SAt` sA, :> ku:. r � ^''� • !s 1: >f ;', rG ''itr?n a n1i i' { <` to :'x 1 r M 1 f uu1/, 'p x 7 p;t s pu 1 t ek ! l - Y „ ( Jk , J t t >'-7 1 1 C .Hk t f k<: •h• 5 11 e: .d t�,n �j, fi >< : , A >Au k ys sx7 r xn M tl.iS A>;'� ,ut 1n�A�i.x+��' ✓ IN'i*0,�,,{{1 L f l 1L'' ' n i6 . t^ h, D%y1 �y 4 Y r q\ t ,xk4,i,k frt �I 0 ,/I�, , :'tf/ �;ly'I i�1Xi tiA � Y,4V 1 v. 4�A4 k .x s ,{ rat,su,syl}.✓,r WM,,..•�x <•;t77 . , 7 1/'tQ '�00 (�'s .,.. < Al r17 r it :StM r ,7iFyx 1, n1 k„,,,,`,,p r4kr �� i s o <.u,� p prynx D6 tx(�xyy}�s.1`$�I Qftk-t, ✓pvr:s�y�n� �,f� �w u � s ■ kQ.A x't n�+.�xu,,kus'.�1 t 4� i�.' t` ?a�s�i'� NM YI11 ,t�� ,,i1,tVMY I W MI.`h(tf l►{y` 24rhz u:. , l ��, *tr Y, 1J/ y y43 `frxk x �� xI,M,V r,sHn 7 r., t r o ?r K ui p } 1 rr s 7 n7u t:,� u '}yeu,5 : A.i; eu" l s.:4:k?4,', 'sk ,7 „ .� r e F - t k' r k:+xu sk�x M ,� N tt t'�w t.f e;x:; C,t'16��c(t 11 i0. Yx u jJy[-/;R ," k t ♦ ( K M ;: ' �/ :F ,k .,A 1 3('!'� ,,Y 5,,`,',,„ ,,.,6T A'PiNi,!" ' ^:.4 t ' A/ .,(c .�4 F�` ,. - k r. ,, ti >t ,,,f, �'A y v .v v u FS a pis u , : y,, >1u r k ,. I. ,, l C �b Y 7 >s>+G „lN F ;' �' 44 t ::�� f`T s uk r r x uc. to , t ,u sx rr ./t""'q"'f^}'l x�,i,n1 .: 02t,�' i ? x s 771 :M , u F l r/t ,., tfh u >ltry. t r�.59 :' Ik .^t , t rr u - is r i x'', ,, r r� kxt x3uj to 3 s. NOTARY r <« e r x, ?,rsrel qt , ttn n ^t k �ttt xx i4°s,1vu>iii vh 7.'t ,u F�v l� r : <, 't>, -.ov. u 1 x'i I : '! vu �' r,trxf,:'; S3 4 . , sonk� ; ►'4 sworn before re, 1�lQt r ub.fa t n ; fQ(th? t$ 1�Va h.±, f hx k rstd�r< �t , - Orlsp sty cif'°p xr & �' t t � t „ xy � � 51t xa . {� I 1 I '''''' MARILYN KAMCHEFF REV 07195 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 - $**,0* *******************************4 *******************************:c****': * BATCH NUMBER: KI COMMEN _ _ * CUSTOMER, NAME SELMA STANFORD * tii. ..wii dLi iidii4.4.-Or*Ib**4**10r+h*s4th*97t1t*A 000020-0013-01 000020-0013-01 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 TAX DEPT TAX DEPT 1700 E GOLF RD V400 1700 E GOLF RD V400 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 125371-0010-04 125371-0010-04 SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK719999 SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK719999 1301 5TH AVE 03636 1301 5TH AVE ;3636 SEATTLE WA 98101 SEATTLE WA 98101 125371-0050-05 125371-0050-05 SEATTLE—FIRST NATIONAL 8ANK669999 SEATTLE—FIRST NATIONAL 8ANK669993 1301 5TH AVE 03636 1301 5TH AVE 03636 SEATTLE WA 98101 SEATTLE WA 98101 125371-0060-03 125371-0060-03 CITY OF KENT 660762 CITY OF KENT 660762 CUSTOMER SERVICES CUSTOMER SERVICES 220 4TH AVE S 220 4TH AVE S KENT WA 98032 KENT WA 98032 125381-0390-02 125381-0390-02 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 741447 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 741447 PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 777 MAIN ST V2680 777 MAIN ST 02680 FORT WORTH TX 76102 FORT WORTH TX 76102 252304-9054-06 252304-9054-06 DRAINAGE DIST 1 062152 DRAINAGE DIST 1 062152 C/O JOHN NELSON C/O JOHN NELSON 601 WEST GOVE 601 WEST GOVE KENT WA 98033 KENT WA 98033 362304-9001-07 362304-9001-07 RENTON BUILDING 1-7 772496 RENTON BUILDING 1-7 772496 C/O MCELROY GEORGE & ASSOC C/O MCELROY GEORGE £ ASSOC PO BOX 565048 PO BOX 565048 DALLAS TX 75356 DALLAS TX 75356 362304-9002-06 362304-9002-06 CITY OF RENTON 369700 CITY OF RENTON 369700 200 MILL AVE SOUTH 200 MILL AVE SOUTH RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 362304-9018-08 362304-9018-08 KLAPPENBACH DOUGLAS W 729999 KLAPPENBACH DOUGLAS W 729999 411 108TH AVE NE STE 580 411 108TH AVE NE STE 580 BELLEVUE WA 98004 BELLEVUE WA 98004 i 362304-9032-00 362304-9032-00 2ELMAN RENTON LLC 840806 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 840306 707 WILSHIRE BLVD 03036 707 WILSHIRE BLVD V3036 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 362304-9033-09 362304-9033-09 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 840806 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 840806 707 WILSHIRE BLVD V3036 707 WILSHIRE BLVD 03036 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 362304-9036-06 362304-9036-06 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE715175 TAX DEPT TAX DEPT 1700 E GOLF RD V400 1700 E GOLF RD V400 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 362304— i071-02 362304-9071-02 2ELMAN RENTON LLC 840806 ZELMAN RENTON LLC 340806 707 WILSHIRE BLVD V3036 707 WILSHIRE BLVD 03036 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 362304-9086-05 362304-9086-05 BARBER ASSOCIATES 271736 BARBER ASSOCIATES 271736 7979 S 130TH ST 7979 • S 180TH ST KENT WA 98032 KENT WA 98032 362304-9091-08 362304-9091-08 DRAINAGE DIST 1 712777 DRAINAGE DIST 1 712777 P 0 BOX 297 P 0 BOX 297 KENT WA 98032 KENT WA 98032 362304-9096-03 362304-9096-03 CASCADE FEDERAL CREDIT UN 542484 CASCADE FEDERAL CREDIT UN 542484 PO 30X 58450 PO BOX 58450 SEATTLE WA 98138 SEATTLE WA 98138 I 362304-9100-07 362304-9100-07 WACKER ASSOC 710941 WACKER ASSOC 710941 C/O THE MADISON CO C/O THE MADISON CO 415 BAKER BLVD V200 415 BAKER BLVD 0200 TUKWILA . WA 98188 TUKWILA WA 98188 362304-9104-03 362304-9104-03 DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 839700 DRAINAGE DISTRICT 1 839700 PO BOX 297 PO BOX 297 KENT WA 98032 KENT WA 98032 )00000-0000-00 *;Yalc*ica,'c** c***,'<*af k**fca}c**;c*i<**:c>,'cijc;<** ********************************* *a;c**,c,<>;**,cx***;c,"c,c*i<***,i*fcfc$cica; *,c** *****,t********,isc*ic*b'k*******,t,4ac** • .‘Y O e Ci a PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES: The fallowing Mitigation Measures MR likely be imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above.Additional or revised mitigation measures may be warranted as a result of detailed project analysis.Final mitigation measures will be issued as pad of the SEPA threshold determination. NOTICE OF APPLICATION 1.Tratnc Mitigation Fee-375 per new average daily trip attributed to proposal. AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- 2.The applicant will be required to provide a lair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M) intersection of SW alst Street and Oakesdale Avenue SE. 1.Fire Mitigation Fee-S0.52 per square foot of new construction. DATE: June 23,1998 Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr.Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on July 7,1998. II you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Peter Rosen APPLICATION NAME: Soren-Eleven/Lelman Site al(425)430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to fanstmG a-7-I1'convenience store(3.0W square feel),a commercial retail building(8,500 square feet),and a gas station with eight Nei Islands,four 10,000 gallon underground CONTACT PERSON: Mr.Peter Rosen;(425)430-7219 fuel storage tanks,and an overhead canopy.The proposal includes a total o158 parking spaces.Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway oil SW aim Sheet. PROJECT LOCATION: NW comer of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON.DIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED IDNS-MI:As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 41.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods tsr the project end the proposed CNS-M are Integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination 01 Non-Significance Mitigated(DNSM).A 14 day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 17,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 23,1998 PenmltslReview Requested: Environmental Review(ECF) Administrative Site Approval(SA-A) Building Permits HEI YrmJon. Requested Studies: Geolechnical Study,Traffic Study.Drainage Report __-- KManmx.,aw+151E Location where application may Kr_ be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public WOMB Division,Development Services Department, c—�— I. r I � t 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98058 . PUBLIC HEARING: None required.Administrative review only. _ `�'r CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ' � •, • •�-Land Use/Zoning: Commercial Arterial(CA)-The proposed convenience store gas station,and commerGal retail building are pens tted uses:n the CA zone.Proposal is /(_ generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan pot Ges and Zoning Code .-.._•'SIrJ_ rst requirements. = Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Oakesdale Campus Rezone,Dakesdete Business Cam Ws,Dakesdale Campus Phase) Development Regulations •_,r .•. Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code regulations,Public Works Standard's.Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,etc.These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. • GENMALOTOOC GENNALOT.00C CERTIFICATION • • I, S- mi VV v`'A(+k , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document ere posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on JWi t&i -- , lagf • Signed: 1/1AAAAV t-h ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and foY the State of Washington residing on the 1 day of /4 5 f • • A- - -e� • MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 • IRO + ye. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: June 23,1998 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Seven-Eleven/Zelman Site PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a "7-11" convenience store (3,000 square feet), a commercial retail building (8,500 square feet), and a gas station with eight fuel islands, four 10,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks,and an overhead canopy. The proposal includes a total of 58 parking spaces. Access would be from one driveway off Oakesdale Avenue SW and one driveway off SW 43rd Street. PROJECT LOCATION: NW comer of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: June 17,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 23,1998 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental Review(ECF) Administrative Site Approval(SA-A) Building Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Study,Traffic Study,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98058 PUBLIC HEARING: None required. Administrative review only. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use/Zoning: Commercial Arterial(CA)—The proposed convenience store,gas station,and commercial retail building are permitted uses in the CA zone. Proposal is generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and Zoning Code requirements. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Oakesdale Campus Rezone,Oakesdale Business Campus,Oakesdale Campus Phase I Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code regulations,Public Works Standard's,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. GENMALOT.DOC PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. Additional or revised mitigation measures may be warranted as a result of detailed project analysis. Final mitigation measures will be issued as part of the SEPA threshold determination. 1. Traffic Mitigation Fee-$75 per new average daily trip attributed to proposal. 2. The applicant will be required to provide a fair share contribution toward the cost of a new traffic signal at the intersection of SW 41st Street and Oakesdale Avenue SE. 3.Fire Mitigation Fee-$0.52 per square foot of new construction. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mr. Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on July 7, 1998. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Peter Rosen at (425) 430-7219. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Mr.Peter Rosen;(425)430-7219 treat NE16148c C01 MAP Foe Vo4.oa EtALE __ KENT-RENTON EA 36-23-4 351E - ri ---- ice r AIM .-...... • --_.__. In i T I P� t 6 I r- ., ice' i....,'i ... .,.. Q 1 '1 Y I' ° II U e l... LACI1 • ,3 v STRICT IDIV.i I FJ -I GENMALOT.DOC CIZ x" OF RENTON 41 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 22, 1998 Ms. Karen Wallace RHL Design Group 1550- 140th Avenue NE#100 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Seven-Eleven/Zelman Site Project No. LUA-98-100,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Wallace: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on July 21, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425)430-7219, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Zelman Renton, LLC/Owners Independent Development Co., LLC ACCPTLTR DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 0 © CITY OF RENTON , _.. , ..:� mil Planning/Building/Public Works t- J ��1"'� � s o ,tu N 2 a�s e +a5 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 W .r ,�,,6, » 0 2 9 47 Cc cc FBMET�4 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 06 25 91 F t 0171114564 S.W11STAGE ; ,,. __Ks.,.„_., . • 125371-0010-04 17 SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL 8ANK719999 c. i 1301 5TH AVE 13636 r SEATTLE WA 98101 ~' INOTBELIVERhBLE ,1., - i 4 ,, 1 A$ ADDRESSED RETURN TO SENDER y . *PI, , 4 '�1i cze,S 11,1,,1ri1.11:...i,initi...11.1 I.I1t 1I��.iei,11Ill„I1Iai,1ii,„iiiiino,1I __. = V)17 Eif', CITY OF RENTON :.:...:. ::.... .....:..:.::::.:::.:. -::.: ;.. DIVISION .: :::::...::: ;.;: :::::.: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ;:.>::>::>:::::::< MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master Application for each owner.. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: N/A NAME: Paul Casey '' 11 /i 'L/M1ct SITE Zelman Renton, LLC. PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 707 Wilshire Blvd Suite 3036 NW Corner of SW 43rd and 0akesdale Ave SW CITY: Los Angeles CA ZIP: 90017 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Adjusted Parcel I; a portion of Parcel No. 362304-9045 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (213) 533 8 EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant 100 APPLICANT.(if other than owner) .......... PROPOSED LAND USES: Convenience Store, Fuel NAME: Richard Gumpert Islands and Specialty Retail Shops COMPANY (if applicable): Independent Development EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Company, LLC. E.A. . ADDRESS: 742 First Street South PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A DEVELOPi',IENT PLAT ,,1INJG CITY OF RENTON CITY: Kirkland WA ZIP: 98033 EXISTING ZONING: CA JUN 1 'f 1998 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 827-3688 RECEIVED PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A. CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): 69,939 S.F , NAME: Karen Wallace RHL Design GroupPROJECT VALUE: Approximately $2,000,000 COMPANY (if applicable): g ADDRESS: 1550 140th Ave NE #100 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No CITY: Bellevue WA ZIP: 98005 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? No TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 746-4677 LEGAL'DESCRIP ►N OF PROPERTY (Attach separ` sheet if necessary) ► ':TYPE OF APPLICATION &'FEES Check all application types that apply-:-City staff will determine fees _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ —TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ 4/SITE PLAN APPROVAL —A - $ OW.00 _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT ' $ (NO. CU. YDS: 1. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: 1 _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE :$ _ VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charae /ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW S 500.00 REVISION $ — . AFFIDAVIT;OF OWNERSHIP; I, (Print Name) Paul Casey ,declare that I am (please check one)._the owner of the property involved in this application,, 'the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ZELMAN RENTON, LLC By: Zelman Industrial Partners, Inc. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary By: Paul Casey . Vice Presidant for the State of rE,,\, nYl\(, residing at CIO I L':.3.Y Jam_ `1� (Name of Owner/Re re ive) A(1., of c n Pp_ 9lY1i i , on the iFi n day of it, -1! �� t • nL . 19 . . ti.t!?it, ii- (Signature of Owntr/R presentative) -- . i yp 1)„i�i 1 o (Slgriature of Notary Publi 1 boo ; tThls; ecUan to be completed by Ctty Staff) � �3' City FIIe Number 07 xt: A AAD BSP CAPS CAP-U CPA CU A CU Hai MHP P. .UD FP PP R: RVNIP SA SA H SHPL A :SHPL H SP SM SME TP. ;V A TOTAL FEES `$ I TOTAL POOSTAGE PROVIDED $ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 P7��IVNN 3(t2X• lam ADJUSTED PARCEL I LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A Portion of Parcel No. 362304-9045) The South 230 feet, except the West 598.82 feet thereof, of the following described parcel: That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 36,Township 23 North, Range 4 East,Willamette Meridian, City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying North of S.W. 43rd Street, lying West of Oakesdale Avenue S.W., lying South of Springbrook Slough Drainage Ditch No. 1, and lying East of the following described line: BEGINNING at a point on the centerline of said S.W. 43rd Street, from which point the Northeast corner of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim No. 43 bears North 88° 48' 43" West 784.19 feet distant; THENCE North 01° 11' 17" East to the South line of said Springbrook Slough Drainage Ditch No. 1 and the terminus of this described line. Also known as Adjusted Parcel "l" of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-98-027-LLA, to be recorded in the records of King County, Washington. Project: February 20, 1998 6777L.001 RWG/srnijss THE ZELMAN COMPANIES 707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 3036 • LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 •TELEPHONE (213) 533-8100 • FAX (213) 533-8118 June 15, 1998 VIA FAX NO. 425/277-4455 Ms. Jana Huerter City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Former Sternco Site Renton, Washington Dear Ms. Huerter: This letter shall authorize Paul T. Casey to execute the Submissions and Applications on behalf of Zelman Renton, LLC. Sincerely, ZELMAN RENTON, LLC By: ZELMAN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS, INC. By: Brett M. Foy Vice President BR/am cc: Ben Reiling Paul T. Casey Dick Burr bmf/huerter renton 0205 ZELMAN DEVELOPMENT CO. ZELMAN INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS,INC. ZELMAN RETAIL PARTNERS, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Project Narrative for 43rd & Oakesdale Site: 1. The site is located at the Northwest corner of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. The property extends 305'West/East and is 215' running North/South with a chamfer at the SE corner of 18.5'. 2. The site is currently vacant. The existing sidewalk and curb ramp are in good condition and will not need to be improved. 3. The site is relatively flat and will be drained into a detention pond north of the property. There are no special features. 4. There are no particular views to obstruct. The buildings in the vicinity are a far enough distance from our property, that our project should not affect them. 5. The site will have a 3,000 square foot 7-11 convenience store with (8) fuel islands, (4) 10,000 underground storage tanks and a canopy; along with a shopping center of 8,500 square feet. • Regarding the 7-11 portion of the site: Maximum building height is 18'-3-1/2". Canopy height is 22'-0"for the 'T' Canopy. There are 14 parking stalls with 16 available spots at the fuel islands. • Regarding the shopping center portion of the site: Maximum building height is 18'-0". There are 47 parking stalls. • Combined site improvements: Access is from a shared driveway at the Northernmost part of the site on Oakesdale Ave. SW. and a driveway on SW 43rd Street. The combined lot coverage is 16% of the site. CEJ JUAI iL L L,D \\bell\cadd\project\independents\9433.30\doc\project narrative for 43rd.doc 06/10/98 Construction Mitigation Description for 43rd & Oakesdale Site: 1. Proposed Construction Dates: Begin: 9/8/98 End: 11/30/98 2. Hours of Operation. 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. 3. Site is already graded and prepared. Hauling will be minimal. Proposed Hauling Route: SW 43rd Street to Valley Freeway "State Route 167". 4. We are not planning on any special measures. Implemented Measures will be maintained per the approved methods of the City of Renton. 5. Hauling hours to be at the times least detrimental to traffic flow. We do not anticipate any hauling outside of our normal hours of operation. 6. The preliminary traffic control plan will be coordinated per Contractor and City of Renton standards. We have (2) new approaches to build. We will have to divert traffic at that time. We do not foresee any other extended periods when traffic will be affected. f:\project\independents\9433.30\doc\constructionmitigationdescription.doc 06/11/98 Environmental Checklist CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all government agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ‘C� ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably f� .'�. related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. �`‘ (% o�fN> Use of checklist for nonproiect proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may `�%' 9- be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1 . Name of proposed project, if applicable: N/A 2. Name of applicant: Richard Gumpert Independent Development Company, L.L.C. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Richard Gumpert Independent Development Company, L.L.C. 742 First Street South, Kirkland, WA. 98033 (425) 827-3688 4. Date checklist prepared: 5/8/98 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction Start: Late August 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. We have designed for a future Car Wash. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. a) SEPA, submitted for Oakesdale Business Park. b) Geotechnical Engineering Study, SW 43rd Street & Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, Washington, December 8, 1997 prepared for Zelman Development Company, by Earth Consultants, Inc., Bellevue, WA. c) Traffic Impact Study Report for Oakesdale Business Campus, Renton, WA., by Entranco, Bellevue, WA. d) Drainage Report for Oakesdale Business Campus, Renton, WA., Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., Kent, WA. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. Environmental Checklist 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permits, Site Plan Review approval, UST Installation Permit, Elec. Monitoring for Hazardous Materials Systems Installation Permit, PSAPCA, DOE, SEPA. 11 . Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the site of the project. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposed project is to construct a new 7-11 Convenience Store, 8 fuel islands, Canopy and Specialty Retail. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plan submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is at the NW corner of SW 43`d St. & Oakesdale Ave SW in Renton, Washington. The site is located in Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County. A legal description is attached to the Master Application. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): an rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, •t er: Relatively flat, elevation ranging from 20 to 24 feet. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 4.4% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, Environmental Checklist gravel, peat, muck►? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to Earth Consultants, Inc. December 8, 1997 Geotechnical Engineering Study, the site is typically underlain by 35 to 40 feet of interfingering and poorly stratified silty sands and sandy or clayey silts. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unknown. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will be graded to allow for positive drainage into the detention pond along the creek (north of our property). The site will be designed to meet 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements for control of storm water. The intent is to cut and fill with onsite material to balance the site grading. Some imported structural fill will be required to allow 2' min. of structural fill under the continuous footing foundation. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No, because the site is relatively flat. Provisions for temporary erosion control and interim storm water management will be installed and maintained during construction to the approved methods of the City of Renton. Upon completion of work, disturbed areas will be landscaped. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) Approximately 78% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Provisions for temporary erosion control and interim storm water management will be installed and maintained during construction to the approved methods of the City of Renton. Upon completion of work, non-impervious areas will be landscaped. 2. Air a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate 4 Environmental Checklist quantities if known. During construction: dust from excavation, Construction vehicle emissions. After construction: normal HVAC exhaust, automobile exhaust. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Primary off-site emissions will be from SW 43`d Street and Oakesdale Ave SW. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No special measures — compliance with local air quality regulations 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Springbrook Creek is located approximately 350' north of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 5 Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, wastewater will be discharged into the municipal sanitary system. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals of humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into to other waters? If so, describe. The source of runoff will be from rainfall only. Treated on-site runoff will be released to detention pond to the north of the site. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, or runoff water impacts, if any: Site runoff will be treated and released in compliance with city regulations. 6 Environmental Checklist 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder mapie)aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass _pasture _crop or grain _wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing trees, shrubs and ground cover will be removed only as necessary. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All disturbed areas are to be fully landscaped to meet the requirements of the City of Renton's Zoning and Landscaping Codes. Landscaping plans will be developed for agency review during permitting of construction documents. Native plants will be used in the landscaping plans. Landscaping to include trees, shrubs, ground cover and seasonal flowering plantings. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds MO eron, eagle, on•birds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: none fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Environmental Checklist Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: New trees and shrubs will help provide for the needs of the existing wildlife. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy for lighting/ cooling and natural gas for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use or solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: This project will meet or exceed the Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health d. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police, Fire and Emergency Medical services may be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Sanitary and storm water drainage systems will meet or exceed local requirements. 8 Environmental Checklist b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Vehicular traffic noise from adjacent surface streets. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from site. Short term noise from construction activity between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm. Long term noise from an increase in traffic between approximately 7:00 am and 9:00 pm. Noise from the HVAC mechanical equipment. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activity will be limited by local noise ordinances, which will control the hours of operation. 7. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site: Vacant North: Vacant East: Commercial (Warehouse) South: Commercial (Warehouse) West: Vacant b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CA 9 Environmental Checklist f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area — Valley (EAV). I I g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 4 to 6 people might work at the 7 Eleven Convenience Store Approximately 15 to 20 people might work at the Specialty Retail j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project complies with existing and future zoning guidelines. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10 Environmental Checklist 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The maximum height of the Canopy is 18'-6". The prime exterior building material of the convenience store will be CMU. The Specialty Retail building will be Stucco. Storefront systems will be provided at the entrys. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The project will meet all local height and setback requirements and will incorporate architectural features and colors compatible with the local area. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Site lighting to support normal operations, security and safe circulation. All fixtures will be provided with shields to prevent glare. No daytime glare will be produced. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Parking Lot lighting will be designed to focus only on the proposed site and will be shielded away from adjacent property and public streets. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? .i " I Environmental Checklist None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Unknown. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site will be served by SW 43rd Street between West Valley Highway and State Route 167, and SW 41st Street from State Route 167 and eventually Oakesdale Avenue from the north when the extensions are completed. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is served by bus service along SW 43`d Street. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 12 .1l Environmental Checklist 66 parking stalls are being proposed (w/ 16 @ fuel islands). There is no current parking on the site, so no parking is being eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. There are Burlington Northern freight rail lines in the vicinity, but the project will not use them. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Driveway trips would be a maximum of 1,500 per day. 120 to 160 driveway trips could occur between 4 and 6 pm. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. The Owner and tenant will implement required transportation management programs to encourage employees to use public transit and car pool to work. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. This project will require public service needs such as police and fire protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities 13 Environmental Checklist a. Ci - ties c -• avail. . - at the site:antb natural ga water refuse service telephone, sanitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water - City of Renton Natural Gas - Puget Sound Energy Sanitary Sewer - King County/ Metro Telephone - US West Electrical - Puget Sound Energy C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: , /t • Name Printed: Richard Gumpert Date: 6/15/98 14 98 - 240 MEMORANDUM DATE: 1'9`l TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: l./'L/-t:'CL tL 7-FLA,C.41 LOCATION: Al b\J Je'l'YL 4" of /lye' _ ti� ' �'(ti� 'BSI A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /C E't , Thursday, meet1� 11'' in the 3rd floor conference room. If this ing is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to -/ A-- at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. r� L. � c_. vYlS Ii 1c Ii. h V� r � TJ� ( / /VIcS" F —� LfNo c4-/'. w'4(-1 NO S 3r tet-f' c—F 6 �✓ c-� � C VI'v( c� / r f; 11- r (0 e LJ 2. r w d S L / z-.5-0 6 a c-2-( se , 4._c) NsT 1ThP = �SY • . ® . CITY OF RENTON "P- N�o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: April 3, 1998 TO: Jana Heurter, Principal Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Oakesdale 7- Eleven Project, SW 43rd 86 Oakesdale AV. SW Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is 4000 GPM which requires one fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the each building. (14 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the underground tank (S'' /Ki) and piping installation. Vdp PP' U 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site, 4. A fire mitigation fee of $1983.80 is required based on $.52 a square foot of the car wash and store. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 1,I twi' 98 - 240 MEMORANDUM DATE: /l'?!11A-? TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: ('iL/.-e CLit(-i 7'FL ( z v LOCATION: N 1\J M / 6-7f alt."/"z'LL 13Ve' i7t $f- A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for /C :CZ , Thursday, in the 3rd floor conference room. If this mees scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. ' Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to --- ;A- at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. r rJc e : �vz4it ';s grvto T� pcts5brri cIt vtea �tYips !,c<vc . o I 1 A1et /Veto Priwauvtf 7v,es. Gooc? luck. Also dla S �v`1 Siqtuti ,iscc'{ °lo PA4 peeik tkyoulti SW 1-1Ir7 ,n1Levs".1,„1 b e4ze vet,/ C UIU bu;eat tvys ero)lectcc( O I13o vehicles . / e t 11/4 /2$ OAKESDALE 7-ELEVEN SW 43rd St. &Oakesdale Ave. SW Pre-Application Development Services April 16, 1998 WATER: 1. One(1) fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. The primary hydrants must be within 150-feet of the building, but not closer than 50-feet and the secondary hydrants to be within 300-feet of the building. 2. A loop water system is required if the required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. 3. Utility easements must be approve with the approval of the proposed plat. A water easement has not been shown on the proposed plat. 4. The Water System Development Connection charge is $0.113 per site gross square feet, but not less than$850. 5. A 12-inch water main is available on both Sw 43rd St. and on Oakesdale Ave. SW. G{L- l.J 1ff cff 5 i JC d?=S1`/Zc`-b-a 6. The site is located on the NE 36-23-4 quarter section map. SEWER(Waste water) 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $0.078 per site gross square foot, but no less than$585. 2. A utility easement is shown in phase I of the plat review located on the North side of the proposed site. The legal document is to be approved by the City and show on construction plans. 3. A proposed sewer main is located on the North side of the property. 4. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease then an appropriate removal system will be required. G -'t51a ,✓c-cD$ d'L/u,,-a4t 5& 5. Side sewer to have two percent slope to property line. 6. A sewer backflow prevention devise is required if the floor elevation is below 25-feet. STORM(Surface Water): 1. The Storm System Development Connection charge is $0.129 per sq. Ft. of new impervious surface area,but not less than$385. 2. Floor elevation of proposed buildings must be a minimum of 1-ft. above the Fema 100-year flood elevation. 3. It is our understanding the applicant is working with Drainage District No. 1 to realign the District property to better follow the creek. The plans need to show the final location of the District property. 98CM067.DOC\ • 4. Since the storm drainage pond is proposed to serve several lots there must be a maintenance and operations agreement between all properties proposing to use the joint facilities similar to what was done for our Lind Corporate Park Project. Jointly used facilities must also be located with easements that grant benefiting properties the right to use the facility. Submit documents for approval. 5. Most of the above comments are in the Plat Phase I review. There are additional items to be aware of in the Plat Phase I review that will have indirect impact for the site approval. A full copy is attached for your informational use. TRANSPORTATION: 1. The transportation mitigation fee will be $75 per new trip generated. The amount worked out to be$37,861.20. 2. Show existing sidewalk on construction plan. Provide for a five(5)foot sidewalks on Oakesdale Ave. SW with back edge of the sidewalk at the property line and a minimum planter strip between the curb and sidewalk of five(5)feet. 3. Show City of Renton Standard driveway detail drawing on detail sheet of the construction plan. 4. If pedestrian curb ramp does not exist at the intersection of SW 43rd St. and Oakesdale Ave. SW then it is to be provided. . dS Q> . 5. The off-site improvement fee proportional share for a traffic signal at Oakesdale Ave. SW & SW 41st St. would be$1,307.81. General Item: 1. It appears the Eastern part of the site goes over the proposed property line. 2. An entrance access from the North at the North property line appears to be to close to the driveway entrance from Oakesdale. Distance should be 50 to 75 feet from driveway. 98cm067 98CM067.DOC1 • OAKESDALE BUSINESS CAMPUS SW 43RD Street & Oakesdale Ave. Sw. PHASE I Plan Review April 2, 1998 NOTE: REVISED SEWER COMMENTS APRIL 6, 1998 SURFACE WATER ISSUES: 1. The Storm System Connection Charge is for 8.41 acres or (366,341.07 sq. Ft.) of impervious surface area which amounts to$47,258.00. 2. Floor elevation of proposed buildings must be a minimum of 1-ft. above the Fema 100-year flood elevation. 3 Provide a wetland report for the site to determine if the project will have wetland impacts. Show any wetlands on the plans and identify where mitigation will be accomplished. 4. The applicant is responsible for obtaining approvals of other agencies with jurisdiction for the proposed work along the creek (State Fish & Wildlife, Dept. Of Ecology, Drainage District No.1, Corps of Engineers, etc.). 5. The storm drainage report needs to show the amount of 100-year floodplain storage filled by the project is less than the amount of compensatory storage created. Compensatory storage is required for any fill placed in the 100-year flood plain. 6. It is our understanding that fish habitat improvements (woody debris)will be installed along the creek after contaminated sediments are removed from the creek as part of the cleanup work authorized under Ecology's consent decree. These improvements are to be shown on the plans and activities that would disturb the improvements must be avoided. 7. It is our understanding the applicant is working with Drainage District No. 1 to realign the District property to better follow the creek. The plans need to show the final location of the District property. 8. The plans show the proposed storm drainage pond being constructed over an existing City sewer line. The Sewer Utility may be concerned about future maintenance access. The sewer System may need to be relocated. 9. There is currently a red-tailed hawk's nest on the property near Oakesdale Avenue. The applicant must coordinate with Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife regarding requirements pertaining to the red-tailed hawk nesting sites. Provide City with response of any requirements. 10. The City of Renton East Side Green River Water Shed Project Plan and EIS issued September 1997 identifies a need for improvements to the riparian habitat of the reach of Springbrook Creek along the project site. These habitat improvements are to be made a condition of this project as part of the SEPA process to compensate for the loss of riparian habitat due to the proposed development and because we understand a trail will be constructed within the buffer, further reducing the habitat. The applicant is to acknowledge. responsibility for ensuring that 98CM064.DOC\ • all plantings along the creek are successful for a minimum period of 5-years. The planting scheme needs to be coordinated with what will be installed under the Oakesdale Business Park Phase II&III projects on the North side of the creek. The applicant must meet all conditions of the Renton Code (section 4-32-6H attached) for monitoring program, contingency plan, posting of performance and maintenance surety devices, and other requirements to ensure the success of the plantings. 11. The detention pond live storage elevation must be above the elevation of the current 2-year flood event in Springbrook Creek as modeled by the City. The elevation at the outfall of the proposed pond is 15.5 feet (NAVD 1988 datum). The pond live storage elevation shown on the plans is at 14.5 feet and needs to be raised 1-foot. 12. There is to be more than 5-feet of horizontal clearance between the proposed storm and sanitary sewer lines as the plan currently shows. Minimum separation to be 7.5-feet. Show dimension on plan. 13. Since the storm drainage pond is proposed to serve several lots there must be a maintenance and operations agreement between all properties proposing to use the joint facilities similar to what was done for our Lind Corporate Park Project. Jointly used facilities must also be located with easements that grant benefiting properties the right to use the facility. Submit documents for approval. 14. The project applicant must prepare a Storm Drainage Report in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City. An offsite analysis is not necessary, but the report can instead reference the City of Renton East Side Green River Watershed Project Plan and EIS for information on the creek. WATER: 1. Water utility review will be provided when shown on plans with sufficient information.. 2. One(1) fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. The primary hydrants must be within 150-feet of the building, but not closer than 50-feet and the secondary hydrants to be within 300-feet of the building. 3. A loop water system is required if the required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. SEWER: (Revised sewer Comments April 6, 1998). 1. Side sewers will need to be shown on construction plans. More review comments may be forth coming when more detailed information is available. 2. Need a key for the plan. 3. Page 1: There appears to be a lot without service. No provisions shown. 4. Page 6: Show dimension of sewer line from channel. 98CM064.DOC\ 5. Page 6: Show how manholes are accessed for maintenance. Need 15' wide gravel access 6" in depth. Also the 3 cell pond will block access to the existing manhole. 6. Will the channel lineament adjustment impact the sewer location? 7. Page 7: Same as page 6. Need to know how to access manhole. 8. Page 8: Same as page 6. Need to know how to access manhole. TRANSPORTATION: 1. The transportation mitigation fee will be$75 per new trip generated. 2. Show existing sidewalk on construction plan. 3. Show City of Renton Standard driveway detail drawing on detail sheet of the construction plan. 4. If pedestrian curb ramp does not exist at the intersection of SW 43rd St. And Oakesdale Ave. SW then it is to be provided. 98cm064 NOTE:Phase I must go through an Environmental Review process before approval. 98CM064.DOC\ • CITY OF RENTON Planning / Building / Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: April 16, 1998 TO: Pre-Application File FROM: Peter Rosen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Oakesdale 7-Eleven - Pre-Application File#98-26 We have completed a review of the pre-application for the proposed Oakesdale 7-Eleven project. Listed below and attached on several sheets are our preliminary findings. Every attempt is made to ensure the accuracy and thoroughness of these comments. However, a more thorough examination of the project at the time of application submittal may reveal additional issues that may alter these comments or require additional comments. Permit Requirements. The proposal would require SEPA environmental review and administrative Site Plan Review. The SEPA review is required for installation of fuel tanks of 10,000 gallons or more. The building size and the number of parking spaces are below SEPA thresholds. The requirement for SEPA review triggers the need for Site Plan Review. These review processes would occur concurrently and generally require 6 to 8 weeks from the time of application. Attached is a flow chart indicating the permit processing timeline. SEPA Environmental Checklist-A SEPA environmental checklist must be submitted with the application materials. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) will review the proposal, potentially require mitigating measures, and issue a threshold determination. The applicant should anticipate mitigation fees for traffic and fire. Traffic mitigation fees are based on \��' the number of average daily trips expected to be generated by the proposal (see Plan Review 4iv) comments). Fire mitigation fees are based on $0.52 per square foot of new construction (see Fire �, Department comments). There may be other mitigation measures imposed for identified potential impacts. Site Plan Review - Site Plan Review is required for all development proposals (which meet SEPA thresholds) in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zone designation. The proposed project would be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator. Site Plan Review evaluates site layout elements including the building orientation, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, and landscaping. A proposal is also analyzed for compliance with the code and compatibility with adjacent uses. Site Plan Review evaluation criteria are listed in Section 4-31-33D. of the Zoning Code. Comprehensive Plan. The project site is located in the Employment Area - Valley (EAV) designation which is intended to provide for a mixture of commercial, office and industrial uses. The proposal generally appears to meet applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Long-Range Planning has provided a memo with further analysis based on Comprehensive Plan policies. Zoning. The subject site is within an area that is presently in the process of being rezoned from Medium Industrial (IM) to Arterial Commercial (CA). The Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of the rezone application. The Renton City Council is expected to take final action on the rezone April 20 or 27. The zone change would be in effect approximately May 1 or 8. Gas stations with mini-marts or convenience stores are allowed as a secondary use in the CA zone subject to the condition that "the size and location shall be reviewed as part of the site plan approval." Car washes are permitted as a primary use in the CA zone. Oakesdale 7-Eleven. DOC Development Standards • Setbacks - A minimum 10 foot front/street building setback is required. A minimum 10 foot wide landscape strip is required abutting public streets. There are no side or rear yard setbacks required. The pre-application site plan appears to meet the setback requirements. Landscaping - The CA zone requires a minimum landscape strip of 10 feet along public streets. This landscape strip must be provided on the applicant's property. The zoning code requires a pedestrian connection/sidewalk between a building entry and the street. The site plan should be revised to accomplish this. The subject site is located within the Green River Valley Planning Area. The code requires 2% of the gross site area to be provided as a natural landscape area. Staff recommends that the applicant (J • accomplish this requirement with landscape enhancement of the stream buffer area. 'W Parking - The Parking and Loading Ordinance sets standards for parking requirements based on the type of use proposed. The convenience store would require a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The gas station would only require parking if it includes a garage with service/repair activities, in which case the parking requirement is 1 parking space per 400 square feet. The site plan should include a parking analysis which provides the number of parking spaces required and proposed for the different types of uses proposed on the site. The pre-application appears to include sufficient parking for the proposed uses. The car wash should meet parking standards pertaining to drive-up windows, requiring a minimum of 5 spaces for stacking, separate from the parking area. Queuing cannot extend into the public right-of-way. The pre-application shows the queuing spaces around the back of the building and the layout appears to be adequate. For parking lots with a 90 degree head-in parking, the required parking stall dimensions are 9 x 20 feet. 30% of the required parking may be provided as compact stalls measuring 8.5 x 16 feet. A 24 foot wide aisle width is required. The site plan should include number of compact spaces provided and indicate parking stall dimensions. Signs - Signs are subject to a separate sign permit application. The sign code permits one freestanding sign per street frontage for individual businesses. The pole of a freestanding signs must meet the 10 foot setback requirement, however the sign may project a maximum of 6 feet into the required setback area. The sign code allows for wall signs with a copy area not to exceed 20% of the building facade to which it is applied. e naw+ /4--66e),, g Kip cc: Jana Huerter / .64' /rJ oc.0 c Oakesdale 7-Eleven.DOC DEVE' r'"1.7''77 r ANNINa • C. ON CITY OF RENTON REC;EIVED PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: April 13, 1998 TO: Jana Huerter FROM: Rebecca Lind O ti. STAFF CONTACT: Owen Dennison(425 277-2475) SUBJECT: Oakesdale 7-Eleven Preapplication—Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Comments 1. Intent of the land use designation The site is designated Employment Area-Valley (EAV) in the Comprehensive Plan. The EAV designation intended to provide for a mixture of commercial, office and industrial uses. New development should be located designed,to achieve compatibility with adjacent uses. The proposed commercial use falls within the range of uses indicated for the designation. Zoning is Commercial Arterial. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan • The proposal is generally consistent with the policy direction for development in the EAV. The proposal is specifically consistent with the following applicable policies. Policy L U-212.1 Develop the Renton Valley and the Black River Valley areas as a place for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial uses. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. Policy LU-212.8 Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. Policy LU-212.9 Commercial uses may be located in proximity to existing industrial uses when reasonable buffering between the uses can be accomplished and when adequate accommodation of deliveries and loading to industrial areas can be maintained. Policy LU-212.19 Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. 3. Areas of potential inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-212.21 Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged. Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking. •\\TS SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-H:\DIVISION.S\P-TS\PLANNING\PREAPP\EAV\Oak_7_11.doc\o ii April 13, 1998 Page 2 If Development Services perceives a benefit to requiring a direct connection to future development on the adjacent site, Policy LU-212.21 provides a nexus. 4. Advisory Policy LU-160. Developments should provide appropriate treatment (e.g. landscaping, improved building facade) along major arterials to mitigate adverse visual impacts. Policy LU-291. Beautification and screening of parking lots should be encouraged through appropriate landscaping,fencing and berms. H:\DI VIS ION.S\P-TS\PLANKING\PREAPP\EAV\OAK_7_11.DOC To determine if flood insurance is available contact an insurance agent or ca I the National Flood Insurance Program at(800)638-6620/ / +' APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 500 0 500 H 1---1 H I 1111 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP STREET cn KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS u PANEL 978 OF 1725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY OL NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX KENT,CITY OF v 1 ", I :r 0978 F RENTON•CITY OF • P�'%••• 0978 F TUKWILA,CITY OF 0• 'r1'7 A 0978 F ��J� ��N j7,RFNi'/Vi^,G P, 19 - CFI ^9B a: Y MAP NUMBER a 1 53033C0918 F & FLOODING EFFECTS FROM Q�P SPRINGBROOK CREEK ZONE A 0`Y,tAN (EL 23 MAP REVISED: �G`i'"A`` MAY 16 1995 47°26'15" 122°13,07" ,a =41'.f, , ,. IIILI. \ply::-,,I-o 177' Federal Emergency Management Agency J f r was: „IF, to • • LEGEND BYE 00-YEAROfDLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED ZONE A No base flood elevations determined. ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined. 122°13'07" 47°28'07" ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas 1 of ponding); base flood elevations STREEt determined. 1 13SH ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths adiiidetermined.For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. r w ZONE A99 To be protected from 100-year flood by NSW .t Federal flood protection system under to construction; no base elevations determined. w ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); no base flood elevations determined. 19 ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave STREET action); base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE ,, -, x8 OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year Iflood with average depths of less than : ztitiii 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by d �- ' levees from 100-year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-year • + floodplain. . � N ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS AikieltiailliAltiirimfi r M ' ,,x> , Identified Identified Otherwise ;., ;I 1983 1990 Protected Areas C.11 oastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. Flood Boundary Floodway Boundary ' Tr Zone D Boundary} 4 Boundary Dividing Special Flood 1 ( `� '� fV. Hazard Zones, and Boundary I ') g,\ f Dividing Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations . „ t Within Special Flood Hazard r„ 1 ; Zones. i 1 ^'k Base Flood Elevation Line: c 513 Elevation in Feet. See Map Index for Elevation Datum. l: O Cross Section Line .� 2i r' ST , / \J Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987) Where Uniform Within Zone. =- \ See Map Index for Elevation Datum. \�4'l RM7 X Elevation Reference Mark • M2 River Mile i r rn Horizontal Coordinates Based on North 97°07'30". 32°22'30" American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27) = Projection. 1-- D NOTES SW 29TH ZONE X This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program; STREET it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding,particularly from w local drainage sources of small size, or all planimetric features outside \�JJ Special Flood Hazard Areas. w Q Coastal base flood elevations apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD,and include the effects of wave action; these elevations may also differ significantly fromthose developed by the National Weather Service for hurricane eva;uation planning. z Arens of Special Flood Hazard 1100-year flood) include Zones A,AE,AH,AO, il A:as and VE. II \ II i' SOUTHWEST II Ili,,-,,'''ht,„, '..:....' ' ./ ------------------.1\ CITY � OFt 530088R8ENTON �� j ZONE AE / _ Ji I O (.7. ,\. (,)er } { 1 �. BRIDGE �� kt Q Ffie �$ O7 . SOUTHWEST 0 : i.------------- 2 . S1 - ZONE X _ N CRE 01 �a 5?" > T - a ,✓' ZONE ,AE - o J 2 may/ " h. ».- __C ' 3RD STREET ,S0� RM339 SOUTH —CITY OF TUKWILA d _ ,,� — 180TH CITY 0_F RENTON CITY OF KENT ......... _ O A S RM347 CITY OF KENT o m 18 O # cmS 181ST . STREET ZONE AE �o,>. s • ti z ,, Q Footbridge ill �✓ w 1 . c Kent Bike Trail - 36 Q �`� 182ND STREET ` 0 0 CITY OF KENT co (- 0 4 530080 o - ZONE X ZONE AH oc. (EL 17) ,. y 14 JE X Mill Creek 0.46. ti ZONE X , ZONE AE s, ZONE AE ZONE AE JOINS PANEL 0986 J.o-JUM-1U9U 1/: 1/: VY buia-tax nessage rage 2 CI- GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 FIFTH AVENUE Title Unit: U-06 SEATTLE, WA 98104 SECOND COMMITMENT Phone: (206) 628-5610 A.L.TA COMMITMENT Fax: (206) 628-9717 SCHEDULE A Order No.: 498046 Officer: DARYL S/ROGER T/BARB W/PAUL S. Your No.: INDEPENDENT DEV./ZELMAN Commitment Effective Date: JUNE 10, 1998 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $0.00 1992 EXTENDED Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount $0.00 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Inured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $0.00 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: ZELMAN RENTON, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 'c;;v ` 8 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WT TAeoMA/OM19A%/RLK 10-JUINl-19YN 11: 11: iY IiUld-I-dX Message Page 3 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 498046 Your No.: INDEPENDENT DEV./ZELNAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THE SOUTH 230 FEET, EXCEPT THE WEST 598.82 FEET, OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WA, LYING NORTH OF S.W. 43RD STREET, LYING WEST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W., LYING SOUTH OF SPRINGBROOK SLOUGH DRAINAGE DITCH NO. 1, AND LYING EAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: • BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID S.W. 43RD STREET, FROM WHICH POINT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HENRY ADAMS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 43 BEARS NORTH 88'48'43" WEST 784.19 FEET DISTANT; THENCE NORTH 01°11'17" EAST TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SPRINGBROOK SLOUGH DRAINAGE DITCH NO. 1 AND THE TERMINUS OF THIS DESCRIBED LINE. ALSO KNOWN AS ADJUSTED PARCEL "I" OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-98-027-LL1, TO BE RECORDED IN THE RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CHICAC'.O TITIF,INSURANCF COMPANY cita«na6/1.1 5_97/r m • 10-JUI'1-1•JMtl 11: 11: J`J b01❑-tdX rwssdye rays111 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Order No.: 498046 Your No.: INDEPENDENT DEV./ZELM4N Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments,overlaps,boundary line disputes,or other matters whichwould be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. D. Any lien,or right to a lien,for contributions to employee benefit funds,or for state workers' compensation,or for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,all as imposed by law,and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,tap,capacity or construction charges for sewer,water, electricity,other utilities,or garbage collection and disposal. G.Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations,Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. H.Water rights,claims,or title to water. I. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records,or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW CHICAGO TTTI.F.INSURANCE COMPANY WT.TACOMR ia-gun-iaau .Li: ta: ya uotu-rifX message rage 5 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 000498046 Your No.: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: DECEMBER 31, 1997 RECORDING NUMBER: 9712312199 T 2. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE 81-2-08117-7. 3. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONSENT DECREE FILED IN KING COUNTY UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 97-2-179$8-2 REGARDING CLEANUP OF CONTAMINATION. 4. THE EFFECT OF ANY VIOLATION OF LAWS, ORDINANCES OR REGULATIONS RELATING TO ENVIRONMNETAL PROTECTION AS DISCLOSED BY INFORMATION CONTAINED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 97-2-17988-2 AND/OR OTHER COURT FILES RELATED THERETO. D 5. PENDING ACTION IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT: CAUSE NUMBER: 97-2-17988-2 FILED: JULY 18, 1997 BEING AN ACTION FOR: ENTER CONSENT DECREEE PLAINTIFF: STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY DEFENDANT: ZELMAN RENTON L.L.C. ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF: MARK C. JOBSON p 6. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF RENTON. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. CHTCAGOTMF.TNSURANCFCOMPANY dtecmtt,t-sin/dm is-.rutr-lays li: Li: ya autu-tax message edge____Ii_ _ I"' I it CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 498046 Your No.: INDEPENDENT DEV./ZELMAN SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, bpi DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF I' UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES) : I' YEAR: 1998 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 362304-9045-05 LEVY CODE: 2110 ASSESSED VALUE—LAND: $ 2,445,800.00 ASSESSED VALUE—IMPROVEMENTS: $ 1,000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $32,364.25 PAID: $16,182.13 UNPAID: $16,182.12 AFFECTS: A TRACT OF LAND APPROXIMATELY 18.7 ACRES, OF WHICH THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL IS A PORTION. 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR ZELMAN RENTON, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY A COPY OF ANY AMENDMENTS TO SAID AGREEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED. 9. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY ZELMAN RENTON, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SPOUSES AS OF THE DATE OF ACQUISITION, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS/MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. H 10. TITLE IS TO VEST IN INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AND WILL THEN BE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MATTERS SHOWN AT PARAGRAPH(S) 11. 11. WE FIND NO CORPORATION UNDER THE NAME OF INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ON THE LIST OF ACTIVE CORPORATIONS IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE. IT MAY NOT BE A LEGAL ENTITY CAPABLE OF HOLDING AN INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY. EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF SAID CORPORATION MUST BE SUBMITTED. f 12. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN CHICAGOTIT1.RINSURANCECOMPANY dtncmA2/rlmp-isv1 10-JUfI-1H`JU 11: 11: ..JU nessdye rye CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 498046 Your No.: INDEPENDENT DEV./ZELMAN SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS I, THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. AA 13. TO PROVIDE AN EXTENDED COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY, GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A THROUGH D WILL BE CONSIDERED WHEN OUR INSPECTION AND REVIEW OF THE CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IS COMPLETED. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS E THROUGH H WILL REMAIN IN THE OWNER'S POLICY TO ISSUE. OUR INSPECTION MADE ON FEBRUARY 10, 1998, DISCLOSED THAT THE PROPERTY IS UNIMPROVED BUT THERE MAY BE POSSIBLE OUTSTANDING LIEN RIGHTS DUE TO HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND CONCRETE PIPE ON SITE WITH APPARENT WORK UNDERWAY. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CURRENT TRANSACION ANTICIPATES TRANSFER OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING TAX PARCEL, WHICH WILL REQUIRE MEETING THE SHORT PLAT REQUIREMENTS OF KING COUNTY AND/OR THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEN THE SHORT PLAT HAS BEEN FINALIZED PLEASE ADVISE US AND WE WILL REINSPECT FOR EXTENDED COVERAGE MATTERS AT THAT TIME. A SUPPLEMENTAL COMMITMENT WILL FOLLOW. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST FIVE (5) WORKING DAYS BEFORE ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE FOR OUR REINSPECTION. L NOTE 1: OUR EXAMINATION DISCLOSES THAT THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN DOES NOT CONFORM WITH THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE REAL PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT UNDER WHICH THE PROPERTY IS TAXED. THE REAL PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES. TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES DO NOT PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR LOSS BY REASON OF THIS MATTER. NOTE 2: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S) . GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND) . CH!CAGO TITI.F INSURANCE COMPANY crtacmh2i dm/1 1 7 to JUll V.5tu A. . 11. -Da uulu-f-[1X rressaye rage a _- li CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 498046 Your No.: INDEPENDENT DEV.IZELMAN SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION) . ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN). **A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R.C.W. 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36-23-4. END OF SCHEDULE B CHICAGOTITlEINSURANCECOMPANY c1tflrnb2/r1m/1-IS97 t U J U1% .L J J U 1.I.• 1 L. J.'1 UUlU 1 UA 11ab`JU1yt: I Uys s CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA.COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 498046 Your No.: INDEPENDENT DEV./ZELMAN SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 0 THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HAVE BEEN SENT A COPY OF THIS COMMITMENT: CHICAGO TITLE ESCROW-SUE STEVENS SUE STEVENS 1/1 KIDDER, MATHEWS AND SEGNER RUSS SEGNER 1/1 INDEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RICHARD A. GUMPERT 1/1 ZELMAN DEVELOPMENT CO. PAUL T. CASEY 1/1 CHICAGO TI i.F,TNSURANCF.COMPANY etscznh2fdm/1-ts-97 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIC WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY: BY: Calculations, Survey 1 Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural a AND a Elevations, Grading 2 Existing Covenants(Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if'applicable a Floor Plans 3AND4 Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site4 Landscaping Plan, Conceptual 4 Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument), Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letter2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 a Tree Cutting/Vegetation Clearing Plano i'Alf\ Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map4 ri• " Wetlands Planting Plan 4 v Cj 1 A- pJ �Pay. Wetlands Study 4 ?4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: `� M1 /'7- 2. Public Works Plan Review Section fi�r 3. Building Section DATE: ( h' qg 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xis **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 06/17/98 14 : 34 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9803672 Amount : 1, 511 . 52 06/17/98 14 : 34 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #4615 RHL DESIGN Init : LMN Project # : LUA98-100 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: NW CORNER OF SW 43RD ST & OAKESDALE AV SW Total Fees : 1, 511 . 52 This Payment 1, 511 . 52 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 511 . 52 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 11 . 52 TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR THE 7-11 MINI-MARKET AND GASOLINE SALES LOCATED AT THE NI/VC-S.W. 43RD STREET AND OAKSDALE AVENUE RENTON, WASHINGTON OUR JOB NO. 6777 S.S. GRue June 12,. 1998 �� �. Q. rsA 74. � 28527 Prepared By: r BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC, 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH TM 4,1 KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 O�REN OI,N/NG (425) 251 -6222 SUN 1 1998 &HAG, ED tO Zs = CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I. INTRODUCTION/GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed 7-11 convenience store, and gasoline sales is located at the northwest corner of S.W.43rd Street and Oaksdale Avenue in Renton,Washington. This 1.6 acre site is within the proposed Oaksdale Business Park. This Business Park is a 41-acre development which has been submitted for permitting by the City of Renton. The project is located is located within the northwest quarter of the northeast of Section 36, Township 23 north, Range 4 east. The Oaksdale Business Park includes the stormwater detention and water quality treatment facilities for the entire 41-acre parcel including this subject development. Storm drainage for the subject development will be conveyed to this Oaksdale Business Park facility via a catch basin and storm pipe collection system. All conveyance facilities will be sized in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. Specific project water quality systems provided consist of a separate collection for the area underneath the fuel island canopy. This area is directed to a trench drain and a oil/water separator prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. Storm water sheet flowing in the direction of the fuel island area is collected within a trench drain. This storm water is then collected and conveyed through the storm water system to prevent the run on of storm water into the fuel island area. A copy of the Technical Information Report is enclosed which further describes the drainage conditions and requirements for the subject site. Also enclosed within the appendix is the geotechnical report and soils information for this project. 6777.001 CFB/ph • TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR KESDALE BUSINESSPHASE ♦ Y.•.. ...R:.}......n•,v...... } tt 13 EN To. r...• .. � :. '} :•.:: .; .; isSv;:;:;:i}`::::::?is�:�:::�i'riii}{:.}i::iiiS:'vY`vJiii}}::iii`}i: •J".y++i,tr+}f:?h.^�tiu.•'�•.•}'?b::$.�ncr.{: :•}Y.?•-; .. .ar .t... ........} ........ .. .. � :.�}";��:;%%:?%::{t:;::y;::i::>:::;;;is�:ii:�:�:`Si:�:Y�c:;:;G:::i:^:�r: ..}.rf .hh •••fi}r A.ftvvvtu,:?}':;::}::::::::::}'::w:::::::::.y::::::::::::::.�:.� :::::.::::.::::::._:::::::::::::: :::: :.0. .}:v:•.•i•%::.}•.-:,::.i'ai:::•il:i::i':�:}}}::'v:•}i.;w::.i::'}:''}::}}iii:?'}}::ii:: :ii:ii::::!�:iiii:':: :ii:.:�:4:: n.v x}, .?k•:•:n.. '.;L:j:v$:2 '�'�%y;:<;:?{:: jji:ij:y i:;�'^�':'?ijiiii: .t 1. :....:. ' :..•: .v-�rrr.....,i,1:"?:???,'•:ar.�::':......: .....r.^:}.:?i•>.'•i:�:::y:�:i::::r<;:;:?:;}::::�;..: '....................::..::::. .h rYF .?. ♦ ,. ....rn r` .... .n..•:•..vv n......• ..... }'•••:nv::n..:::•::}}:v::::::::::...:...:..............:....... v... w.. ♦i:{ii:'+.`.':}}ii}..unr fc° OUR JOB NO. 5911 JANUARY 29, 1998 'AOt 69 24ss 3 r, • .�sS�ONQ \,\C,\� f E::?:h=3 6 I,-98 Prepared By: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1821 5 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 �6NA(, (425) 251 6222 - CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES o • z+@ v I. INTRODUCTION/GENERAL INFORMATION it li 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed Oakesdale Business Park is an approximately 41-acre site located at the northwest corner of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and S.W. 43rd Street in Renton, Washington. The site is situated in both the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East and the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 36, Township 34 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, King County, Washington. Site development will occur in two phases. Springbrook Creek flows roughly west to east through the property. Phase II and III will consist of development of approximately 31.5 acres north of Springbrook Creek. Phase I will consist of development of approximately 9.8 acres south of Springbrook Creek. This Technical Information Report and accompanying set of design plans are prepared exclusively for Phase I of the development. Phase I of the Oakesdale Business Park includes a lot line adjustment and construction of a stbrm drainage conveyance system, wet/detention pond, and sanitary sewer main line to serve each proposed lot. Parcel owners will then be able to develop individual lots and tie into the proposed systems. No grading and/or paving improvements are proposed for Phase-I at this time. A ridge line from the southwest corner to the northeast corner of Phase I roughly parallels Springbrook Creek and divides on-site drainage into two flow directions. Ultimately, all flow from Phase I is combined at the outlet end of the quadruple 72-inch corrugated metal pipe culverts conveying Springbrook Creek under Oakesdale Avenue S.W. 5911.005[KWL/kn1 Page 1 of 2 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner Zellman Development Company Project Name Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 1 Address 707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 3036 Location Phone Los Angeles, CA 90017 Township 23N Project Engineer Karl Lundberg Range 4E Company Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc, Section 36 Address Phone 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent, Project Size 31.5 AC WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 Upstream Drainage Basin Size 0 AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS • ❑ Subdivision 0 DOF/GHPA 0 Shoreline Management ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ COE 404 ❑ Rockery ❑ Grading ❑ DOE Dam Safety ❑ Structural Vaults ■ Commercial 0 FEMA Floodplain 0 Other ❑ Other 0 COE Wetlands ■ HPA •ART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN. • • • • Community Green River Drainage Basin Springbrook Creek, Green River •ART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS •.• • • . • • • . . • - ❑ River ❑ Floodplain IN Stream Soringbrook Creek ■ Wetlands ❑ Critical Stream Reach 0 Seeps/Springs ■ Depressions/Swales 0 High Groundwater Table ❑ Lake 0 Groundwater Recharge ❑ Steep Slopes 0 Other ❑ Lakeside/Erosion Hazard • •ART 7 SOILS • Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities puyalluo Flat Low Low Urban Flat Low Low 0 Additional Sheets Attached •ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS • . REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT ❑ Ch.4-Downstream Analysis ❑ Additional Sheets Attached 591 1.002[KL/tal rage or L King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS • MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION • Sedimentation Facilities ■ Stabilize Exposed Surface • Stabilized Construction Entrance ■ Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities • Perimeter Runoff Control ■ Clean and Remove All Site and Debris ❑ Clearing and Grading Restrictions ■ Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities ■ Cover Practices ❑ Flag Limits of NGPES ■ Construction Sequence o Other ❑ Other PART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM ❑ Grass Lined Channel 0 Tank 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis ■ Pipe System 0 Vault 0 Depression SBUH ❑ Open Channel 0 Energy Dissipater 0 Flow Dispersal _ Compensation/Mitigation ❑ Dry Pond 0 Wetland 0 Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage ■ Wet Pond 0 Stream 0 Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Tightline conveyance system to wet I detention pond to provide detention and water Quality prior to release to Sprinobrook Creak, Facility Related Site Limitations 0 Additional Sheets Attached Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS . PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS, • . (May require special structural review) • • ❑ Cast in Place Vault ■ Drainage Easement ❑ Retaining Wall -- ❑ Access Easement o Rockery > 4' High 0 Native Growth Protection Easement ❑ Structural on Steep Slope 0 Tract ❑ Other 0 Other PART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER • I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual 111141 site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. siy 591 1.0021KUtal III >. ):TT" UYY1� A _.. a --��1 E x i T ??'•^, -;.- T:EATMENT PLANT ANS• 44111,‘ illTIP/PN.o00000000;,00.IIIIIIIIIIII.1111. 1 IF‘;EP . :::-. C. u> d m ta O'r:qt1/ f IINP.:, 1 \ _ ,,,, CO :C VSW 19 ST a � . ,,, Talbbt 51 : C O swtz,s W Evans o Black Dr "'4 .�- .' 1 •.••••• SW 23 ST o I 1 o • Blvd SW 27 ST _ S 28 S Treck Dr \ 67 \ : w SITE SW ST N 1 ' O Q S-W30ST , ( 25 Yyp D 3W3 t 6 ' m W 3 SW 34 ST h r • IL. u SW39ST S37 gr o c1 Cr \ S 1 SW • . " cc SW Al ST Saxon Dr t / h� VALLEY i Onili• < {� MEDICAL S T 1 ' 0 3 SW 43 ST _ CENTER of h s. <c T i_l I ., s te2 ST 3 6 �, o e '�1 :aJ h � �� 1 0 S lacier is 168 ST t S T r^ CC S 189 ST o t �� S ,� —, L. < \, SITE LOCATION MAP NTS Reference: Greater Renton City Alap, 1987 Edition i II. PRELIMINARY CONDITION SUMMARY it ji 2.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Approximately one-third of the site lies north of the ridge line and drains directly into Springbrook Creek. The remaining two-thirds of the site sheetflows in a primarily southerly direction before reaching a poorly defined ditch, which conveys drainage toward Oakesdale Avenue S.W. The drainage is collected in a larger and better defined ditch just outside the Oakesdale Avenue S.W. right-of-way and is collected in the underground piping conveyance system of the roadway. Runoff is conveyed north beneath the east side of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and is discharged into Springbrook Creek at the outlet end of the quadruple 72-inch CMP culverts. Existing soil conditions are listed in the King County soil survey as Puyallup (SCS hydrologic group B)and urban(variable). Type B soil texture is described in the King County Surface Water Design Manual as moderately fine to moderately coarse. The geotechnical engineering study by Earth Consultants Inc. dated December 8, 1997, contained in Section 6.0 of this report describes the soil's texture as fine. Therefore, we have used curve numbers that correspond to Type C soils, which have texture described as moderately fine to fine. 3.0 DEVELOPED AND FUTURE SITE CONDITIONS On-site flow patterns will not be significantly altered by the construction of the pond, storm drainage, and utilities as shown on the plans. As parcels are developed, however, storm drainage will be collected in a series of catch basins located in paved areas and conveyed to the storm drainage system provided to each lot. Storm drainage in future developed conditions of Phase I will be conveyed to the pond. 4.0 HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS/DETENTION SYSTEM -- The storm drainage conveyance system is designed to convey the peak flows from the 25-year/24- hour design storm at full flow conditions. The rational method is used to determine peak flow rates and Excel spreadsheet software is used for the computer calculations. The wet/detention pond is designed using hydrographs generated by the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph method. The pond is designed to release peak flows from the developed 2-year and 10- year/24-hour design storms at peak rates less than or equal to the existing condition peak rates for the 2-and 10-year/24-hour design storms, respectively. A 30 percent increase in volume over the required volume for the 10-year/24-hour design storm has been added. WaterWorks software is used to calculate the peak flows, design volumes, and outlet control. Water quality is being provided in a wet pond portion of the wet/detention pond. The required wet pond volume of total runoff from the developed 6-month/24-hour design storm has been doubled to eliminate the need for a biofiltration swale preceding the wet/detention pond. 5911.005 [KWUknl ,I,J J! f I x \\ \\\'� ��+ \\ \v, . • m \\�� \\ \ \\;'. : i 4* rejil \ \ lq„cs\\., : ' \\\\\ \.,.., „\\.s....:‘‘.7,\ .. \. \ „, , 1 4.,w , :- il 4s , Nsr ' II S. III' Y . __ I I i I \ `its,\\\�'! \`\\ \ j1�-� •a M. / x+. 1 1 ', I ao 1 \ ' 11 , i .9 • $a 1• Ii x x+l \ \ \\ \• \\ �/ ' I I i I �� 1 \ \ \ �\ \\\`\\ '\ ...... ...-.. ,y, . i ,, .,,,, ,„,,,, i .. \‘.11/4,.//.-,,,, m 1 x,,, , .1. ' ,I1 s::,00_ , ,Rer1 ,/ /) y Li f 1, 1 _.,\,.‘. ,,,.„.,,4,) \ ,, \\,'. v,.,x,\, \ CC t' \ \\ x,.?, '` \, \\ \\ \ e S x,'.1,:5 ,,? ,.. \\,. ,,,...,. ....„-,0„,°4-.0-.0,0 t... t* , i 1 j :3.IjIV 'ir K )�_ I 1 • \ 1 f.rz, f 'J d'`' .•i J 7-- --'i__.•- •'Q4 4PIOH) 11 °+x �1 y \ T �'!tp / rl°M) , 1 1 1\11 CO _ /iwY �, ;, y 1 ..� x.� I x +' \ 1 1 1 x'�� 1 xJ�j v'+ -- ..r A \ x'J 1 1 /�yc s li 4 p I \ • 1 ; 1 1 1 1 m O \ , ' 1 1 \1 �► r`I ` j "� ��'4 1 y 1 I .. I f x \ m 1 1 \\\• I •, 1 b '' 1 „ 3 ! �.,`` A tt f? / \�; \ °P III ��' •1 \ • \' + is \ + \ ° I 1 i 'i isgli._'• f 1\ I, \\ \ \ I ' \ tD `\, 1 '1 \ I \ \\ I 11 1 �� '1 ` \ ti \ \ , � 1 \-, i xJ \ ->o \' 1' �I Ii �� \ \ . \ I1 \ 1 \ 1! x 1x / I \ \ \ I et v .� b i s '\ x ��S \ \\\\ \\ 18 \\\ \ \ \ \ti \ I x • \\` \\\ • six I !r: b 1 \ / \ 4� '(1-I " 1.•. ., , ,,„„,,` , j�* �J x�, \ x 1 \ \ T\,'\\`?; , •\ f. �, ‘,,\• ' k, , ‘ �` ) \\ 1 , \ ,..„., \ : 1 I\\)/ 1 I i g i; I / x '� its \ 1 \, \ 1 1 z Y '•, \ \ \ \ • ;, \ 0. \ \ 1 ! 11 ;k2/,. x 4, 1 1 \ x 11 •,1 ia: \ ��1+ I c : . x \., ilyx, l 1 t \ x �`• ` .\.-- ••t b ` < I b xyl ''� Ste' \ / \ .\ x I c\ •:*.4 x ••,. •::i10::•• 4 • • ( x0. . , . . , . ,'', rI i,,,,, ' :' 11Z GJ x,J 1 \ \ 1 x, 1 •ti \ f1 , \ ....•-• \... >04:40, \ iJ 'I I A ,, E,.. /.i': ' j*:41 Z pt , ,, , Lip., , • . \ \\ 0 \ . , ..,,,, .a., . tt. i, \' • s M 7 • d ;: ..A , v.., X '� ')•,, e• o+i_ x+� �R I y 1 Y+ T D - x > CD \ N ( ...,, ..... ' Q 0 m c '!� __� -_•_ x x • 9 x0 tr. sky x� x ____%$�/ ,A __ 73> \ 4 I x� '1+ 8743:210:7111 - s.k4'7.:rb Qom•-_ ,.„ . • I . a dys ✓$ DisP.sal / �I ` /140: . .`IAA \3:1-='''' 1;> --'''Hillis `t i • .M 1,\Itir05°111---414 ' •• ' 6 9 \� • ,1 III /4. I Pu 1 it�: ..... ' it (\'7 .1.),1-1 \ r0/77777-41:i2E11 7‘ _ Lir (f ,� $ „Longacre4.:I :I�\` it I , i� li, -re:: • l l� I ill \, G I „ Rat€ 1=as ` I Wo 1 :eD .n ".ii, ,,, . ....I.1 I 1.1 U r ',,7..,.\ QI , .,« Track 1--- `� — _ lik—v- 19 Pi I iiI u I Ur R• :rvoir ..�1 IL, �_ I . So I WO :M 1 A Pu t���i�'� 25 \ 169 yCh _ 1SITE ' IU . l n PY Sk I 1� Ur • I �� n Wo �` \■ j . \ u (Tu . InC A A, IA ilr ) Y � •'7/, :,, i__ 1 adi �, 'PY . , I. Wo e...,,,.,: 1 1 i 1* . „.._,..e. 4, (ki.„..di , „,.., • , i ,I7i7 : y• I p 1 • i� I e• ti''1 ,� N. � � � � I Ur I I _ ill. a� ,:J �'1' 1 s : I i. `,� I AgC• 1 4all I1 • 1 4 IBM . \ v I ,, w I 351 I: ' i Q ;I Nk1 I • I IL 1 Wo BrReIUr 1\.• :., ', Os • W �LVp 1 1',r .'• • '. �- • cam' KING COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP i" = 2000' • . • / Jtit NGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the20 unesstheo low CN areas are less than 1 5% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. ZGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY • SOIL GROUP HYDROLOGIC GROUP' HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP Ald e rwood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material Arents, Everett Material C Oridia Beausite B Ovall D I Bellingham C Pilchuck C Briscot Puget C Buckley D Puyallup D Coastal Beaches D Ragnari , Coastal Silt Loam Variable Renton B Edgewick D Rivenvash D Everett C Sala! Variable Indianola A/B `Sammamish C Kitsap A Seattle D Klaus C • Shacar D Mixed Alluvial Land C Si Silt D Mixe Neilton Variable Snohomish C Newberg A Sultan D Nooksack B Tukwila C Normal Sandy Loam C Urban D D Woodinville Variable D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep,well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wett• ed, and , consisting chiefly of soilsI with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately . fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. r O. (High runoff potential). Soils I- having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material_ These soils I I . have a very slow rate of water transmission. From SCS, TR-55, Second Edition, June 1936, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soil Interpretation Record, Form #5, September 1988. s 359-? l 1/92 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.28 SCS WESTERN WASIHNGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution. 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C 0 Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 — Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 - 88 94 Open spaces.lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair.condition: grass cover on 50% to 75%of the area 77 8590 92 • Gravel roads and parking lots 76 135 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots • 72 82 87 89 ,•^ Impervious surfaces. pavement, roofs. etc. - 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds. etc. 100 100 0 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA • 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 • 4.0 DU/GA • 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA • 50 • 6.0 DU/GA 52 . 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments. % impervious condominiums, apartments. must be computed . commerdial business and industrial areas. t (1) 'For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Encineering . Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas•(lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve cumbers. • = • 3.5.2-3 I1;9: j S`J// _ [.ss,s•, -tle_o Pa '7 -ie.esru ram �/ 9 8 !lL ,LreGAi r ritakin K'.JG co 5'a(L.. Su2Vc / .ttr GcNrw,,vs Z D'r'/'f -c" Se / L. M, ppf, c 4-i&,a LS : R/Y/9av/' Frn, . � 0",oMO Y Lo/1.,1 Y`sPcr b Vr' 'v26RN Let/Li) ✓Ata�.48� G6OT�Gl4"-)/CAL4- /le/W-1— <8z FZci,J ) �/ks So t L.-5 ro N N N Qr' g',41A'LY F/N( SALvd 5 4<4.rs "c '' S-ot f.45 F-F�F- W W V! - N an v1 Ov UND is T�/Ll�e`p as e/v $lo ' - f�csvt�1.oNd0�e-ta'P t cA-Pe-O Heir cN c 4fS R3✓$L0Pe14//4,7Pe 2vi', F r 2.c t� t P,,0 7.1 t,,, TO7 L p---V coPg-6 /4 ,4 (/Nci-✓b,,../G A9mv 170n> p) 9.8'3 ,4 I,,,so"z tee e(AS ALL ' B.41 /4c. /r•/ Pen-wi ) /4 /, }$ ifL tiO" 01r GGNc_awr?/Q c".1 (r i ?ioN AlsfvMc: 3a0 GP" Seiar% !=t-00.1, /.o/ FdLezSi%1R.us/f �S LF 3&(.04.) Frok.r, a.SY_ rots: G4Btw56(j P&VEctic P cc- n/no,•/ ; /}Ssc#ard /00 j /1_ C�°i`�, /.o'/. , !a8-0 /sbcl LP lcved>, O-zs-4. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B CD Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries,landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 66 90 fair.condition: grass cover on 50% to.75%of the area 77 85 90 92 • • Gravel roads•and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 • Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. • 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 0 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 20 DU/GA • • 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA . 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA • 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 • 6.0 DU/GA 52 • 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 • Planned unit developments. % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) 'For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Enc:neering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas-(lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve -umbers. .0_� • 3.5.2-3 III. OFF SITE ANALYSIS IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 1/29/98 5: 21: 50 pm Barghausen Engineers page Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: dev02yr NAME: 2yr/24hr post-developed SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 9 .89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 1. 48 Acres 8 . 41 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 20. 12 min 14 . 72 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 25. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1600. 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0. 0025 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 impTcReach - Channel L: 1600. 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0. 0025 PEAK RATE: 3 . 30 cfs VOL: 1. 35 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: dev100yr NAME: 100yr/24hr post-developed SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 9. 89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 1.48 Acres 8. 41 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98.00 TC • 20. 12 min 14 .72 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 25 . 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Channel L:1600. 00 kc:42. 00 s: 0.0025 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 impTcReach - Channel L: 1600. 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0. 0025 PEAK RATE: 6.94 cfs VOL: 2.87 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: devl0yr NAME: l0yr/24hr post-developed SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 9 .89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 .90 inches AREA. . : 1.48 Acres 8 . 41 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC 20. 12 min 14 . 72 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 25. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 TcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1600 . 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0. 0025 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Channel L: 1600. 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0 . 0025 PEAK RATE: 5 . 02 cfs VOL: 2 . 06 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 1/29/98 5 : 21: 50 pm Barghausen Engineers page 2 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: ex02yr NAME: 2yr/24hr predeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 9 .89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 00 inches AREA. . : 9 . 89 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 81 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 107 . 53 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0. 4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 450. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0050 PEAK RATE: 0. 41 cfs VOL: 0. 50 Ac-ft TIME: 660 min BASIN ID: ex100yr NAME: 100yr/24hr predeveloped , SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 9 .89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 9 . 89 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 107 . 53 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0.4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 450. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0050 PEAK RATE: 1. 79 cfs VOL: 1. 68 Ac-ft TIME: 540 min BASIN ID: exl0yr NAME: l0yr/24hr predeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY __ TOTAL AREA • 9. 89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2.90 inches AREA. . : 9 .89 Acres 0. 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 81. 00 0. 00 TC • 107 . 53 min 0. 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 300. 00 ns: 0.4000 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Shallow L: 450. 00 ks: 5. 00 s: 0. 0050 PEAK RATE: 0. 99 cfs VOL: 1. 02 Ac-ft TIME: 550 min 1/29/98 5: 21: 51 pm Barghausen Engineers page 3 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 2 0. 397 1360 53553 cf 9.89 3 0.981 810 82292 cf 9.89 4 0. 366 1450 50506 cf 9.89 5 0.735 1140 73230 cf 9.89 6 1.361 800 106924 cf 9.89 1/29/98 5: 21: 58 pm Barghausen Engineers page 4 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST STORAGE LIST ID No. design Description: Design detention pond STORAGE LIST ID No. final Description: Final detention pond (+30%) 1/29/98 5 : 21 : 58 pm Barghausen Engineers page 5 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. design Description: Design detention pond STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 14.50 0.0000 0.0000 15.90 21403 0.4913 17.30 46332 1.0636 18.70 72775 1.6707 14.60 1529 0.0351 16.00 22932 0.5264 17.40 48132 1.1050 18.80 74752 1.7161 14.70 3058 0.0702 16.10 24732 0.5678 17.50 49932 1.1463 18.90 76730 1.7615 14.80 4586 0.1053 16.20 26532 0.6091 17.60 51732 1.1876 19.00 78707 1.8069 14.90 6115 0.1404 16.30 28332 0.6504 17.70 53532 1.2289 19.10 80805 1.8550 15.00 7644 0.1755 16.40 30132 0.6917 17.80 55332 1.2702 19.20 82903 1.9032 15.10 9173 0.2106 16.50 31932 0.7331 17.90 57132 1.3116 19.30 85001 1.9514 15.20 10702 0.2457 16.60 33732 0.7744 18.00 58932 1.3529 19.40 87099 1.9995 15.30 12230 0.2808 16.70 35532 0.8157 18.10 60910 1.3983 19.50 89198 2.0477 15.40 13759 0.3159 16.80 37332 0.8570 18.20 62887 1.4437 19.60 91296 2.0959 15.50 15288 0.3510 16.90 39132 0.8983 18.30 64865 1.4891 19.70 93394 2.1440 15.60 16817 0.3861 17.00 40932 0.9397 18.40 66842 1.5345 19.80 95492 2.1922 15.70 18346 0.4212 17.10 42732 0.9810 18.50 68820 1.5799 19.90 97590 2.2404 15.80 19874 0.4563 17.20 44532 1.0223 18.60 70797 1.6253 20.00 99688 2.2885 1/29/98 5: 21 : 58 pm Barghausen Engineers page 6 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. final Description: Final detention pond (+30%) STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 14.50 0.0000 0.0000 15.90 27825 0.6388 17.30 60232 1.3827 18.70 94607 2.1719 14.60 1987 0.0456 16.00 29812 0.6844 17.40 62572 1.4365 18.80 97178 2.2309 14.70 3975 0.0913 16.10 32152 0.7381 17.50 64912 1.4902 18.90 99748 2.2899 14.80 5962 0.1369 16.20 34492 0.7918 17.60 67252 1.5439 19.00 102319 2.3489 14.90 7950 0.1825 16.30 36832 0.8455 17.70 69592 1.5976 19.10 105047 2.4115 15.00 9937 0.2281 16.40 39172 0.8993 17.80 71932 1.6513 19.20 107774 2.4742 15.10 11925 0.2738 16.50 41512 0.9530 17.90 74272 1.7051 19.30 110502 2.5368 15.20 13912 0.3194 16.60 43852 1.0067 18.00 76612 1.7588 19.40 113229 2.5994 15.30 15900 0.3650 16.70 46192 1.0604 18.10 79183 1.8178 19.50 115957 2.6620 15.40 17887 0.4106 16.80 48532 1.1141 18.20 81753 1.8768 19.60 118684 2.7246 15.50 19875 0.4563 16.90 50872 1.1679 18.30 84324 1.9358 19.70 121412 2.7872 15.60 21862 0.5019 17.00 53212 1.2216 18.40 86895 1.9948 19.80 124139 2.8498 15.70 23850 0.5475 17.10 55552 1.2753 18.50 89466 2.0538 19.90 126867 2.9125 15.80 25837 0.5931 17.20 57892 1.3290 18.60 92036 2.1129 20.00 129594 2.9751 1/29/98 5: 21: 58 pm Barghausen Engineers page 7 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST NOTCH WEIR ID No. 100yr Description: 100yr notch weir Weir Length: 0. 6000 ft. Weir height (p) : 2 . 3000 ft. Elevation 16. 60 ft. Weir Increm: 0. 10 MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. 2yr Description: 2yr/24hr design orifice Outlet Elev: 14 . 30 Elev: 12 . 30 ft Orifice Diameter: 3 . 1250 in. COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. combine Description: combined discharge structure Structure: 2yr Structure: Structure: 100yr Structure: Structure: overflow RISER DISCHARGE ID No. overflow Description: Overflow riser Riser Diameter (in) : 12.00 elev: 19.00 ft Weir Coefficient. . . : 9.739 height: 20.00 ft Orif Coefficient. . . : 3 .782 increm: 0. 10 ft 1/29/98 5: 21 : 59 pm Barghausen Engineers page 8 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. combine Description: combined discharge structure Structure: 2yr Structure: Structure: 100yr Structure: Structure: overflow STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 14.30 0.0000 15.80 0.3246 17.30 1.3728 18.80 2.4692 14.40 0.0838 15.90 0.3352 17.40 1.5399 18.90 2.3606 14.50 0.1185 16.00 0.3455 17.50 1.7028 19.00 2.2197 14.60 0.1452 16.10 0.3555 17.60 1.8590 19.10 2.3530 14.70 0.1676 16.20 0.3653 17.70 2.0061 19.20 2.7061 14.80 0.1874 16.30 0.3748 17.80 2.1420 19.30 3.1883 14.90 0.2053 16.40 0.3840 17.90 2.2647 19.40 3.6945 15.00 0.2217 16.50 0.3931 18.00 2.3722 19.50 3.6514 15.10 0.2370 16.60 0.4019 18.10 2.4626 19.60 3.5396 15.20 0.2514 16.70 0.4708 18.20 2.5341 19.70 3.7801 15.30 0.2650 16.80 0.5845 18.30 2.5849 19.80 4.0042 15.40 0.2779 16.90 0.7221 18.40 2.6133 19.90 4.2150 15.50 0.2903 17.00 0.8748 18.50 2.6176 20.00 4.4147 15.60 0.3022 17.10 1.0369 18.60 2.5961 15.70 0.3136 17.20 1.2041 18.70 2.5472 1/29/98 5: 22 : 1 pm Barghausen Engineers page 9 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Detention pond Design 5911-DET LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 1/2 2yr/24hr design 0.41 3.30 design combine 16.55 2 32783.77 cf 10yr/24hr design 0.99 5.02 design combine 17.07 3 42109.29 cf 2yr/24hr final 0.41 3.30 final combine 16.21 4 34778.23 cf 10yr/24hr final 0.99 5.02 final combine 16.91 5 51072.03 cf 100yr/24hr final 1.79 6.94 final combine 17.29 6 60073.80 cf 989',b f, r,�/,zt ,S'4A982 oZ J�LZLZ 1 0'91-Z`2..2 Z.02- 9 ( £'zo, b1 z£6 'as oz b'bZ SI ooe9k Z 'oat;EA , z£3 oLe'rz '21 Zrg6z s'► D bka'GI ems'$/ • I /za►.z. y-7) 1on3 (/2� c..4a) P 52 17, 9n, ( ,rs) �' 77 5-VP2'.61 GcrZ i'uanv' - c12''7 1 62cfro _may w.✓n 10A 4 �a .,-''sPc 129d S�wn-t0A -ter71602 o"5l < ,cr' ' S' 7 l ON 24A CA._._ Nod >� c1 //&,5 e bp-2/r yz9p'- 77-rv/ s NBC er— KING COUNTY, W ASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS ---- -it m 4•a .01\b,,,_ _.. II offoRiltif ip\I 4( -'e°Pi lq ilk Ilk imp. , &E a F - rogookii1/4 moorowirsvaidit mk % , /?‘ adtlit 1. '44(1,11:111 A lks‘• V 6t.c! 10 iltinefigili1P,- L ..-:ad.....A .,./1.41 litt.: A . •. /q / -.1t:sloefeilr: --rdslikdb WIPt \ 1 ...I VetifellaPIONVIII02., ..� , ,_- -- .- fro ,-,t, ,4r- --1 49FirfAiMPIP9silW . twa,tlitAiliF : ., N.{.1r.,,Ai.; .1 ``' e.''..„ .4. iltlilT ., .--7 1--'Vim!' 464111 .." if* i . ! - •-• ieib,-:„, 11),,••-rAisogivi•••••••••• 0.40, 0004, 4, • �./ �:. : fly ,lik �a►I . �!�! ,.,". - ����. .. i . ��, � �`�1�►�► ,.�Iti�,� ;ice!.. � -mot .../ ,iihk , . ,4„..• , .,„, Ai Illk .: .- • . . 5.1%,.h.,.1k. e ,,,.., i ., .. . ��I:�.. i - - - ii„,..1/4 �•:�r;, ,tea.,. r.f i tkli IP /i kr\. iriten-7--iiiFiVr y , 1 4 1 mr. st .. // ....i. , ' 110,141k 114,1110,VNINNNZ\ re ..f.,,.,,,,,„ __, • „.........,,_!,,,.„ th... , \ !. ,,o,,..1 , JAI. ookiliorg. - N‘,,,, N ...: :._ . -. , ...., :„.-- 4,, „,, „.1.,1[0.,, (t=it.. t_c.,* .. N _..,.41 .n \ ...7.2 i -11F11111, .- .1:1* 131 gip i 1 M. gp, -- :&N: 4\44 "ro• / - . , -, wpm', -... isi t 6 lopNi gi , %,1k.N Nrr Immi / ) • it -- ' ifictrotrir Ufkilkit 4•11b . ' ,i - -IP'!" '+ .. Olt ,4:1,40.14iirminsirlis_MI.IiiidnorrillIt....1 h: . — • • 41 14fillikii qklWar4 '.A irtj - - i.. Ataliiillink - 11014111,41i4' EN -, 1 , , \:lzki --- "/N.\• alib'l 010111.11"14r*rar IA _ 241,1.N CV ''-'-‘‘.' . ' . -:2 lWallinlier Niairgdifthai lit .47r -i , .. . _ . . .,..... 4aastier 4... - ifil _ /- AL -‘-s.ta id I riti mywily( 0 ih, 4- - „,k• 1r 'a .r . . itt c. f - , -ir't4-'--.- . -- .‘•,*WA 1&Mg • C‘41 :4 WANT I I Will \ ..w2L;I 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION Nratlip41 ,.3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ry �/�r�11•����' • 3' TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 141 l 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 Mlles ¢.. KING COUNTY, W AS HINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 23 R ip •Rar#wiry ) . reambrir crma .iiriP Ali la% 24 i AMIE etRiArkagli ,' . 25 ,i jitrortliv 40,01„,,,. „,...,114 , . .,, ., 2.6 ..,, ,. ,....m.t. i „,a,,,,... _ lit. C'-' 2.7 i 11111471411110, 417.54.19041 1‘ "NM , --s• illiqhgaillPir : -2$4rIPS" • 7 '141./ :\:\ 1441111!‘;°•1 WA-1.. .i .4.? ' ' -- 29 \* - 40-/k111-0,-.- -40111 .13211146160., q . ( \i _ „Aerate- ..•Agtiliillilsr , _ea, ca7- 3.0 \ - \..„44411141A-4, okirmikvalabbisrA . A ._ t„..., 0:itti.71- , "-,-Nsitipsolsit- Alm & ' . 11.44,124., tillsior. , A ir3-1" 4-- ye 4, Bli , , • ..., 3/ ili- ,..toreii...,\., - itk N griftt...e., ..7 .- . TorneriiiiIIIIISIVIIIk.) = • . c'' ::irtapoor . y --„reopi...,. . . " vg Nil, .a' it \I\ 141 ak .4ter. / a.4,:- \ \ %114, - Ohillfto 4111) t l* » :\�fi._" �. - .I �, 33 ;' •,' laypagOakilffbeglibi---",„ kb, h jl`t�g N;o0" '� .. � �� e • - i i;.4,:xpit f -, ..# V •Stirtn0 tic- 4- 1h4 Svillt. iggfillk 'X k.' • ii \ IMill ' 11 rit1011164 i irmi. %. ....,, . ....• 444;k„,41,, ,,,,N, .._=, . /7. Jo4,-- - wirrillturik ‘4-110611% k i , ,, .7-4....... ,., . , i , ,c., ii, ,„_ filME NENIAlliwo 4,„_ .... ,..... , 1 v -,p--"41111 IINMAIIIIMI 1:0 : - . Fil,i. ILL . ( i. .,. i _ 0114111 irigeLlrillit- 4.,mil . .. _ . _. . , _. .. leamarivagiyie*,. - _ -N _,_, _._. ...;. 0.,•;siiis .... fiffre,Adebio V 12 '. 1pf -1-- - •• '. - ' . - • ' - rib Nil -"M 1 POW ' 1 iv. -- • • mon '"4 -\Nolirrory grit 1 f ‘ j 1111, %, V r._:ins .1r • - . „_Ti 1 . MEM ''' . • • ' •isi- lox 1 il .... A .... , . _ LaYa I 10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION INEVAPPINIk 3.4� ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR *'. 4W ' ' ,UPq,r . • TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 3S) WP� - --40,00• O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles s. (2, Illaur - �(Mllesw _, 1ciin 3:G, 4n KING COUNTY, W AS HINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL ""CURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS 3.0 - . a —PK/ 11°4 ''------—- - — —-— i "Illirtak ON 114 -- -- If- :4,31 .,, Itoirell044 stt....,, w-<,KitilPt.imSb '..- ..„ ' fi a . / 1.11104111161'%ii] ii*4.it tarri 3.& i 3 algOtOk Villrit ,.fe... .s. vi.ratoo, 3-e : iebtalr t. A&OFFAII gint 42./ witsolgrailL Imilitie, % IN0 1 trAtovii.m..ib '' V/ 4./ .. ,r,,,14,404wAtomiwpaurit., N. \ • Vii-NetrelaiVO c_`o a #al 0 i ' :ill iiirlwa•teti 4. / co:‹ lit ;-,A. e.--. . .it-31111kilitidtr.wwiAil-asoubwoerdmtlisaitgiiiilDisiAli , sio, ...I , ifrok , lieopolov. vi,44,.....-1" . v i,, A . irki%vvirLeLoAme° log•-•=ralltd.. - ist. , ., 16‘1 t-gf,,,,,r„ps.„•,....v.„...__,. ,,, i =ill \ , i. , .7, ,„. iiity 0,44,400 ......: .16- - _ Arg i • / • i Al, ,. i; \vi II ;1.-1 la k 1 At (f An( 4 Orill4.goi 0 0._ '..i.11WI 1 I I I 1 A I I I I 0.* ay , i Riett..\\*-VA 00,1:- %. rix ao,gen‘Tour. ..,. „woo\ - / 411144:h\liin q 4 11‘444‘ lif e." / { 11110*-411•''- III �I� 'I. *Al � 111 � ` ,► \ ..ter, � /i t . • ' ••Ilni 14A*1101111"60 ' ibt \Ilk It..4t4 111110111WVVIO.4111411%' 1 •... i NEU / Aiiiiriarigalli.I.0, -----11r. W",-.1.1r1A IL N\ i II- -- -4141 404$1.1 --k -int z----:„\A, • -4 , 1 itibiLt ' 1 II, fir" v*A8t, A ,--- i , urpit..._, -..... lime/ kv....1. irA ‘1‘ ,,,,,it, 4 , , / ' /1"- iliKetritiperia#4111 IrA Nill ( ( IF .4 v!.i . IpAtit lirt.,,, Imeitoor, - ottop. i AN" . .... ./.‘i b JA-41#_, Irby - --il littquoji. ____z..s,, owl* initiegairl 'VW ,.--\: i irifipsisipm, ik - .A Lj :i _ 1 I Iwo . _ ;,-_ FLIwAa . t :firaillifitillhithitlik1,471 70/41 - �" :atll � N•+, -si-mf, o Ay —,-} •,s. to,'%. • - :- ' • - - - ,A,NrIIA ii : IA . (EAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION o VWAIRPS ) 6 ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24HOUR Qc cm 'E//Mr ,- 5.5 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES t ,41, O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles l r �• .", Z G 111 Aw� AN ` . i r_ V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM DESIGN AND ANALYSIS 1/29/98 5 : 0 : 39 pm Barghausen Engineers page Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 , Renton Storm Drainage conveyance calculations 5911-con --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: CB1 NAME: Drainage to CB 1 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 23 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 40 inches AREA. . : 0. 22 Acres 2 . 01 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 86 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 12 . 81 min 6 . 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0150 TcReach - Channel L: 500. 00 kc: 42. 00 s: 0. 0025 PEAK RATE: 1. 51 cfs VOL: 0. 57 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: CB2 NAME: Drainage to CB 2 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 . 29 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 40 inches AREA. . : 0 . 23 Acres 2 . 06 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 12 . 81 min 6. 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0150 TcReach - Channel L: 500 . 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0 . 0025 PEAK RATE: 1. 55 cfs VOL: 0. 58 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: CB3 NAME: Drainage to CB 3 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2. 68 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .40 inches AREA. . : 0.27 Acres 2 .41 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98. 00 TC • 12 . 81 min 6. 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0150 TcReach - Channel L: 500. 00 kc: 42 . 00 s: 0 . 0025 PEAK RATE: 1. 81 cfs VOL: 0 . 68 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 1/29/98 5: 0: 39 pm Barghausen Engineers page 2 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 , Renton Storm Drainage conveyance calculations 5911-con --------------------------------------------------------------------- BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: CB4 NAME: Drainage to CB 4 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .23 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 40 inches AREA. . : 0. 22 Acres 2 . 01 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 12 .81 min 6. 30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0. 20 TcReach - Sheet L: 50. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0200 TcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0.0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0150 TcReach - Channel L: 500. 00 kc:42 . 00 s: 0. 0025 PEAK RATE: 1.51 cfs VOL: 0.57 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min _ 1/29/98 5:0: 39 pm Barghausen Engineers page 3 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 , Renton Storm Drainage conveyance calculations 5911-con HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 6. 370 480 104455 cf 9.43 1/29/98 5 : 0: 46 pm Barghausen Engineers page 4 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 , Renton Storm Drainage conveyance calculations 5911-con --------------------------------------------------------------------- REACH SUMMARY Network Reach N1 REACH <-AREA> <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN 0 % PIPE Ndepth %Depth Vact Vfull C_Area ID (Ac) (ft) (ft) ft/ft (cfs) (ft) (fps) (fps) Confluence with Network N2 Confluence with Network N4 P1 9.43 1.50 153.00 0.0033 0.0120 6.37 90.78 1.20 79.92 4.21 4.07 CB1 Network Reach N2 REACH <-AREA> <-01A> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN 0 % PIPE Ndepth %Depth Vact Vfull C_Area ID (Ac) (ft) (ft) ft/ft (cfs) (ft) (fps) (fps) P2 2.29 1.00 244.00 0.0031 0.0120 1.55 66.99 0.63 62.87 2.97 3.02 CB2 Network Reach N4 REACH <-AREA> <-DIA> LENGTH SLOPE < n > DSGN 0 % PIPE Ndepth %Depth Vact Vfull C_Area ID (Ac) (ft) (ft) ft/ft (cfs) (ft) (fps) (fps) P4 2.23 1.00 76.00 0.0033 0.0120 1.51 63.11 0.60 60.41 3.04 3.12 CB4 P3 4.91 1.25 213.00 0.0031 0.0120 3.32 79.53 0.89 71.18 3.55 3.49 CB3 PIPE REACH ID No. P1 From: To: Pipe Diameter: 1.5000 ft n: 0. 0120 Pipe Length : 153 . 0000 ft 0. 0033 Up invert 15. 0000 ft down invert: 14 . 5000 ft Collection Area: 9. 4300 Ac. Design Flow • 6. 3695 cfs Dsgn Depth: 1. 20 ft Pipe Capacity 7. 0167 cfs Design Vel • 4 . 2068 fps Travel Time: 0. 61 min Pipe Full Vel 4 . 0750 fps PIPE REACH ID No. P2 From: To: Pipe Diameter: 1. 0000 ft n: 0 . 0120 Pipe Length : 244 . 0000 ft s: 0. 0031 Up invert 15 . 7500 ft down invert: 15 . 0000 ft Collection Area: 2 . 2900 Ac. Design Flow 1. 5463 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0. 63 ft Pipe Capacity 2 . 3081 cfs Design Vel 2 . 9739 fps Travel Time: 1. 37 min Pipe Full Vel 3 . 0160 fps 1/29/98 5: 0:46 pm Barghausen Engineers page 5 Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 , Renton Storm Drainage conveyance calculations 5911-con REACH SUMMARY PIPE REACH ID No. P3 From: To: Pipe Diameter: 1. 2500 ft n: 0. 0120 Pipe Length : 213 . 0000 ft s: 0. 0031 Up invert 15. 6500 ft down invert: 15. 0000 ft Collection Area: 4 . 9100 Ac. Design Flow 3 .3163 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0.89 ft Pipe Capacity 4 . 1697 cfs Design Vel 3 .5492 fps Travel Time: 1. 00 min • Pipe Full Vel 3.4871 fps PIPE REACH ID No. P4 From: To: Pipe Diameter: 1.0000 ft n: 0. 0120 Pipe Length 76.0000 ft s: 0. 0033 Up invert 15.9000 ft down invert: 15. 6500 ft Collection Area: 2.2300 Ac. Design Flow 1.5069 cfs Dsgn Depth: 0. 60 ft Pipe Capacity 2.3877 cfs Design Vel 3. 0377 fps Travel Time: 0.42 min Pipe Full Vel 3. 1200 fps KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL e•IGURE 3.5.1F 25-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS ..,.-- --- ' -.roc." -tik jk ola -- t--- 1 7. :\. tairMarl.'14---qtr41144101 - I l'/', ..i. 3-0 .) Alleiritt&11.$01air-irtimililt <,. .3 a._ _ ram,illiiiiiii\\ 3.s34 1:\' _ _, - -0-- iltrolkUrr, , ;_. / jilleielp.,.4.Eing* ‘ 11k-V1‘- 10-,-E\ -- "-:0,110t-i FBILII. _,II&V,Ar*, 1 { �;a��cr._dr 11,r� 0lialitglr)%1W41111. 1541'.1$ 0 •I A . lig - • 0 t#10001.1111I A 1111 rj I I I II 4ift, 1 , .61 IscC AA. lif 144'1 k' A 4001.01,91Val..'00---& -AK, mit 1 , 1� 414c0*-- /- r� �. rye 7F' it - _:, lit- . If, . i? ' . , six .r,kk ..--- • ,,e6vo.4 _ N ,, 1. •\ Aiw *6; -/ i ,-.-• -" Mil %,1) Nikt _vpieve4.. wer : , ‘ i- I '''`' ' IN23 A 1411 ' v if `,%,..,,._,i / 7 c - 11011141: 141,0411bblr1/4 AT II , >9 '. :i-I \ - I 4 p itatiC al a -V t k , 5.5 ‘' i .: . MI! - SititiOgiirinak 'r- ‘ ,#444‘ / - 1 ,,, : 111 = .i, oray ..,111 ,_ 4.24,,„ if) i i --- 1 -- clUisair 1111 MN \I -- IkilVikiik‘ ••=. . ip ...„.... ii- ‘ • = -. „.....,,,t. Ammo! bik N.,1114 A 4,...-- . _ , : ,_ ,, °a- °111 . OrpoiromibtilAl . , . i ), 12 -, E 4 .iii. \I l‘Klit4r,'— to•Pitill, sol i - i ' ..tivinair 111•2".M.I. 4 ‘''"Iirw vs:0_ 7 irtAL-- kit ki4.a-'ser--- 1 ,matimiT , '—f 1. :.4 l.V4• , -nW--AIALIRiAi U ;. ►ice 11M02i.I.A1•• ,III o ,r 0A41P441 tffi fr4 fr 1 . A":-'--1' -**' ------. --: •-• 4 4 ' _,j '' := UMIIIIIIIIIir '44 4-HOUR PRECIPITATION ' IVAB FIIIII S4 .YEAR 24-HOUR OF 25-YEAR 24-HOUR • A� /V� r107 4 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES nj• 6 •- 3• 1 ' 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 Mlles 3.5.1-1 t n' 0) 4•='A` - y,�" eix "A9 gO ( ) s P.arzt4.- -P6,445c (JS E we--TPa P {O/L Wic L G2L)/ p'- 3 L t77-- m-( vatt,iNtf v14z70 c�5 ��n+i �v4 �'°" ive"="2 oF ��v.swrl L Wrabrt,5 vE vM� ,� D x rr3 2 ye/ 4 aye 42(x voL 2 K ( 14)SZ7 G ,) E SAC' a� P2wiav'T 2$, 65--4 G r vow fr,nr Pa sv1o9 gL /P,24124- Cs) Ave.- Csr ) d(Gr-� ✓a c. (4,-) c_e[.F) .S /O, 374 G 11,6,73 I. 1z,o i2,9`7 17,s6, /4,as-G. z o 25 7 i 7-- 14,0 /4,74 i 0,22 / /y 17, 3 1 a �.,� g 6s-s-- 17, e1 p/ AA/Ale Pazo✓rpcY1 s 6-3 g 4 ` > 2 t6c4 G�' ,� ✓ 1/29/98 5: 21: 9 pm Barghausen Engineers page Oakesdale Business Park, Phase 2 Wetpond Design 5911-DET BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: wetpond NAME: 1/3 2yr/24hr post-developed SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 9. 89 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0. 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 0. 67 inches AREA. . : 1. 48 Acres 8 . 41 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10. 00 min CN • 86. 00 98 . 00 TC • 20 . 12 min 14 . 72 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 25. 00 ns: 0. 1500 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 TcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 TcReach - Channel L: 1600. 00 kc:42 . 00 s: 0. 0025 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100. 00 ns: 0. 0110 p2yr: 2 . 00 s: 0. 0100 impTcReach - Channel L: 1600. 00 kc:42 . 00 s: 0. 0025 PEAK RATE: 0. 83 cfs VOL: 0. 34 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min VI. SPECIAL REPORT AND STUDY SC7I / i GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SOUTHWEST 43rd STREET AND OAKSDALE AVENUE SW RENTON, WASHINGTON E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 PREPARED FOR ZELMAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY • -0 of wAsff� �` ,�-! „.:,-1.:\.,s„W..,. i , ,7AS 6TE75 ~ . r 'r'GI � ail b\c7 s„0,,A, ..:,'`�r i i.I tdll y 3 Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Manager of Geotechnical Services Earth Consultants, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (425) 643-3780 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT 1 More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions, their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years, due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist. The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by The following suggestions and observations are offered earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate- to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may occur during a construction project. differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated.but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason. most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnicaly consultants through the construction stage,to iden- of variances,conduct additional tests which may be OF PROJECT SPECIFIC FACTORS needed.and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur • face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS set of project-specific factors.These typically include: the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration: the location of the structure on the site Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly and its orientation; physical concomitants such as changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- access roads, parking lots,and underground utilities, veering report is based on conditions which existed at • and the level of additional risk which the dient assumed the time of subsurface exploration,construction decisions by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory program.To help avoid costly problems,consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- -technical consultant to learn if additional tests are which change subsequent to the date of the report may advisable before construction starts. affect its recommendations. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground- otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions be used: and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical .When the nature of the proposed structure is report.The geotechnical engineer should be kept changed.for example. if an office building will be apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to erected instead of a parking garage.or if a refriger- ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- frigerated one; .when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE structure is altered: PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified: .when there is a change of ownership.or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet • for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise. this report was prepared expressly for the dient involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the dient. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose. or by the dient ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose. may result in problems. No indi- vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken. when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. Earth Consultants Inc. Ge•ntr chnic-al Engineers.Geologists t4 Environmental Scientists December 8, 1997 E-3000-3 Zelman Development Company 707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 3036 Los Angeles, California 90017 Attention: Sanford Kopelow Dear Sanford: We are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, SW 43rd Street and Oaksdale Avenue SW, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our October 7, 1997 proposal. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the site can be developed generally as planned. In our opinion, the proposed buildings can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footing foundation systems bearing on at least two feet of structural fill following the successful completion of a preload program, or surcharge program in areas where minimal raising of site grades will be required. Slab-on-grade floors can be supported directly on the fills required to bring the site to grade. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Very truly yours, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Is_ A Kyle R. Campbell, P. E. Manager of Geotechnical Services KRClkml 1805- 136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(425)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(425)74-608-60 Tacoma(253)272-6608 TABLE OF CONTENTS E-3000-3 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 Surface 1 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 2 Laboratory Testing 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Preload/Surcharge Program 5 Foundations 7 Retaining and Foundation Walls 8 Slab-on-Grade Floors 8 Seismic Design Considerations 9 Excavations and Slopes 10 Site Drainage 11 Pavement Areas 12 Utility Support and Backfill 13 LIMITATIONS 13 Additional Services 14 APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Boring and Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Typical Settlement Marker Detail Plate 4 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Plate 5 Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A9 Boring Logs Plates A10 through A30 Test Pit Logs Plates A31 through A38 Previous Exploration Logs Plates B1 through B5 Sieve Analysis Plates B6 and B7 Atterberg Limits Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SOUTHWEST 43RD STREET AND OAKSDALE AVENUE SW RENTON, WASHINGTON E-3000-3 INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed development on the northwest corner of the intersection between Southwest 43rd Street and Oaksdale Avenue Southwest in Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and based on the conditions encountered to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development. Project Description We understand the site is to be developed with several dock-high, tilt-up concrete warehouse buildings, with associated parking and driveway areas. These structures will range in size from approximately 7,000 to 170,000 square feet. The preliminary locations of the buildings are shown on Plate 2. We understand some raising of site grades will be required to achieve the dock-high floor elevations. At the time this report was written, design loads for the proposed structures were not available. However, based on our experience with similar structures, we anticipate wall loads will be in the range of three to five kips per lineal foot, and column loads will range between approximately seventy five (75) to one hundred twenty (120) kips. Floor loads for the warehouse and office areas will be in the range of three hundred fifty (350) and one hundred (100) pounds per square foot (psf), respectively. If any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject property is approximately 48.0 acres in size, and is located northwest of the intersection of Oakesdale Avenue Southwest and Southwest 43rd Street in Renton, Washington (see Vicinity Map, Plate 1 ). The most significant topographic feature on the property is Springbrook Creek which approximately bisects the property in a southwest to northeast direction. With the exception of the Springbrook Creek channel, the topography of the property is relatively flat. The elevation of the Springbrook ('rPP stream channel_ ran4es between approximately eight to ten feet below the elevation of the surrounding site. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 2 Several abandoned one- and two-story structures are present on the site. These structures were associated with the agricultural and industrial operations previously performed on the property. An automobile wrecking yard and associated warehouse are still in operation at the northeast portion of the site. Several stockpiles of automobile waste (auto fluff) are located at the northwest corner of the site. Subsurface The site was explored by drilling four borings and excavating 21 test pits at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. In addition, we previously performed five borings and six test pits for a preliminary geotechnical engineering study prepared for the site dated June 4, 1986. Please refer to the Boring and Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A38, for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. The borings and test pits generally encountered ten (10) to twenty_J201 feet of InnseAQ„ me ium dense, interbedded silt_anc silty_sand..._Varying amounts of fill were encountered in • the explorations. The upper compressible materials are generally underlain by medium dense to dense silt, silty sand and poorly graded sand with varying amounts of silt. Expansive soils were not encountered on the site. Groundwater Groundwater was observed in all four borings while drilling at depths of ten (10) to twelve and one-half (12.5) fee istin ground surface. Groundwater was encountered inlest pits P-102, TP-108, TF-118 and TP-121 at depths ranging from eight (8) to fourteen (14) ee a ow existing grades -- Groundwater conditions are not static; thus, one may expect fluctuations in groundwater conditions depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 3 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification of the units encountered and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soils encountered. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests, such as sieve analyses and Atterberg Limits on representative samples. Moisture contents were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring log or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. However, it is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General In our opinion, the proposed buildings can be supported on conventional spread footings with slab-on-grade floors after the successful completion of a preload and/or surcharge program. • A preload program involves placing the fill necessary to raise grades to the finish floor level and allowing the settlement induced by the fill to occur before construction of the building commences. A surcharge program involves placement of additional fill to elevations above the finish floor elevation and allowing settlement to occur. The purpose of the preload and surcharge programs is to reduce the amount of expected post-construction settlements from fill and static building loads. Based on the soil conditions and our experience with similar conditions, the estimated total post-construction settlements are in the range of one to one and one-half inches, after successful completion of a preload and/or surcharge program. In general, for this project, a preload program can be used provided the finish floor elevation is a minimum of two feet above the existing grades. A surcharge nw am wi1I be necessary in areas were the existing gr es -wit in two feet or less of the planned finish floor elevation. Specific surcharge recommendations for individual buildings can be made once building locations and finish floor elevations are available. Foundation elements should bear on a minimum of two feet of structural fill. Depending on grade modifications, this will require overexcavation of native soils. Slabs-on-grade shout be supported on a minimum of one foot of imported granular structural fill, or one foot of cement treated on-site soil, or a combination thereof. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 3 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the field soil classification of the units encountered and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering characteristics of the soils encountered. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests, such as sieve analyses and Atterberg Limits on representative samples. Moisture contents were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring log or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. However, it is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General In our opinion, the proposed buildings can be supported on conventional spread footings with slab-on-grade floors after the successful completion of a preload and/or surcharge program. • A preload program involves placing the fill necessary to raise grades to the finish floor level and allowing the settlement induced by the fill to occur before construction of the building commences. A surcharge program involves placement of additional fill to elevations above the finish floor elevation and allowing settlement to occur. The purpose of the preload and surcharge programs is to reduce the amount of expected post-construction settlements from fill and static building loads. Based on the soil conditions and our experience with similar conditions, the estimated total post-construction settlements are in the range of one to one and one-half inches, after successful completion of a preload and/or surcharge program. In general, for this project, a preload program can,be used provided the finish floor elevation is a minimum of two feet above the existing grades. A surchamixDl be necessary in areas were the existing g es are-within two feet or less of the planned finish floor elevation. Specific surcharge recommendations for individual buildings can be made once building locations and finish floor elevations are available. Foundation elements should bear on a minimum of two feet of structural fill. Depending on grade modifications, this will require overexcavation of native soils. Slabs-on-grade shout be supported on a minimum of one foot of imported granular structural fill, or one foot of cement treated on-site soil, or a combination thereof. Earth Consukants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAI I UDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 4 We understand it is planned to utilize the on-site auto fluff as fill material after_it is treated with cement. OHM Remediation Services Corporation prepared a Draft Engineering Design Report dated August 1997 which provided site remediation recommendations. Included in this report are laboratory test results for unconfined compression strength tests performed on samples of the auto fluff mixed with various percentages of cement) he report indicates the fluff will be mix. i_with 7.5 percent cement for remediation purposes. Based on the uncon of ed compressive strength test results ,tn our opinion, the 7.5 perrcent cement/auto fluff mixture would provide a material suitable for use as structural fill. Specific geotechnical recommendations for use of the treated auto fluff will be presented in a supplemental report. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Zelman Development Company and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. Site Preparation and General Earthwork • The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of surface vegetation, organic material and other deleterious material. The root mat of the existing vegetation can be left_ in place i -a minimum of two feet anri nnP and one-half feet of structural fil underlie foundations and pavements, respectively. The vegetation should be removed: Following the clearing operations, the fill placement should commence. The ground surface where structural fill, or slabs are to be placed should be proofrolled. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of EC1. Soil in loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still excessively yielding, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill or crushed rock to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill, or will provide suitable support for slabs. A geotextile fabric could also be used to aid in stabilizing the subgrade. • Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. Earth Consultants. Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 5 The existing site soils are moisture sensitive due to their relatively high fines content. As such, even after placement as structural fill, they will become disturbed from normal construction activity during or after periods of wet weather. Once disturbed, in a wet condition, they will be unsuitable for support of floor slabs and pavements. Therefore, the upper foot of subgrade should consist of a granular material suitable for use during wet weather or the upper foot of on-site fill soil could be cement treated. If the earthwork operations are conducted during the dry weather season as planned, it is our opinion that the on-site soils can be used as structural fill, including use as utility trench backfill. However, it must be emphasized that the native soils must be aerated in order to lower the moisture content to levels that will allow adequate compaction. Normal grading operations will provide some aeration; however, additional working of the soil will be necessary prior to or during grading in order to lower the moisture content to levels that will allow adequate compaction. If the on-site soil is exposed to moisture and cannot be adequately compacted then it may be necessary to use an imported free draining granular fill. Fill for this purpose and for use in wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum size of three inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. Samples of materials proposed for use as structural fill during wet weather should be provided to us for testing in order to determine the suitability of the materials. Preload/Surcharge Program We estimate settlements of two to four inches could occur from the placement of dock high fills and buildings loads. In order to induce the majority of this settlement prior to construction, we recommend the use of a preload and/or surcharge program. We estimate the preload/surcharge would remain in place for a time period of four to six weeks. A preload program consists of placing structural fill to the finish floor elevation and allowing consolidation of the compressible soil beneath the buildings to occur prior to constructing the buildings. As mentioned previously, surcharge fills should be placed above finish floor elevations in areas where building pad grades will be raised less than two feet above existing site grades. We anticipate surcharges would be approximately two feet in height. More detailed surcharge recommendations can be made when finish floor elevations for individual buildings have been established. In building areas where greater than two feet of fill is required to achieve finish floor elevations, a preload can be used. A surcharge program consists of placing structural fill to the finish floor elevation, and then placing additional fill above the finish floor elevation as a surcharge, and allowing consolidation of the compressible soil beneath the buildings to occur prior to constructing the buildings. Based on the soil conditions and our experience with similar conditions, the estimated total post-construction settlements are in the range of one to one and one-half inches, after successful completion of a preload and/or surcharge program. Earth Canwttanta, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 6 The preload/surcharge fill should extend at least fiv uilding footprints. The side slopes of the fill should be sloped at a gradient of 1 H:1 V or Tatter-. If future expansion of any building is anticipated, the preload fill should extend at least twenty (20) feet in the direction of the future addition. The purpose of extending the surcharge is to reduce the possibility of settlement of the then-existing building from future building or surcharge loads. Because the purpose of the preload/surcharge is to induce settlement, it is necessary to monitor both the magnitude and rate of such settlement. 19 accQ01pfj. l his., ,, ent___ markers should be installed within the building pads. The number of settlement markers placed will depend on the size of the building. As a general rule, one settlement marker should be placed for every 10,000 to 15,000 square feet of floor area. The settlement markers should be placed on the existing site subgrade before fill is placed. A typical settlement marker is depicted on Plate 3, Typical Settlement Marker-Detail. Once installed, and while fill is being placed, the settlements caused by the filling operation should be recorded daily. For the first two weeks after the preload/surcharge fill is in place, readings should be acquired at two to three day intervals. Subsequently, readings may be obtained on a weekly basis, until either settlements cease, or the anticipated remaining settlements are within the previously specified settlement ranges. We should be retained to install the settlement markers and acquire the settlement readings. Should the readings be made by another organization, the measurements must be provided to us in a timely manner to allow for interpretation of the data. This will help avoid any misinterpretation or misunderstanding regarding the success of the preload/surcharge program. The settlement markers must be kept intact during earthwork operations. In our experience, earthwork equipment (dozers and trucks) often destroy or damage markers. This adds to the project costs as the markers typically must be replaced and makes the settlement data obtained less reliable. In order to attempt to avoid this scenario, we recommend the project specifications include a requirement that the earthwork contractor is required to immediately replace any damaged settlement markers and have the settlement readings re-obtained at his own cost. This requirement makes the earthwork contractor more conscious of the importance of the preload/surcharge program and will aid in maintaining the integrity of the monitoring program. Fill for landscaping purposes should not be placed near the building since additional fill could induce further settlements after the building is constructed. If such fill is planned, the preload fill should be extended to five feet beyond the planned landscape fill, or a lightweight fill should be used. Earth Consuttants. Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 7 Foundations In our opinion, the proposed buildings_can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footing foundations bearing on a minimum of two feet of structural fill after successful completion of the preload and/or surcharge program.. Deeendiag_on grades it may be necessary to_o_ erexcavate the existing soil in_order to provide the two feet of ructural fill. If extremely soft soil is exposed in the foundation excavations, it may be necessary to extend the excavation to provide additional structural fill beneath foundations. Exterior footing should be bottomed at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below the lowest outside grades. Interior footings may be bottomed at a depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of the slab. Footings may be designed for an allowable bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred{2,500) pounds per square foot (psf). Loading of this magnitude would be provided with theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in the above allowable bearing capacities can be used. Continuous and individual spread footing should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the supporting subgrade or by passive earth pressure on the buried portions of the foundations. For the latter, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the existing soil or backfilled with compacted fill meeting the requirements of structural fill. A coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be used between the foundation elements and the supporting subgrade. The passive resistance of native soil or structural fill may be assumed to be equal to the pressure exerted by a fluid having a unit weight of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). These, lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor-of-safety of 1.5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one and�ae-half-ides is anticipated with differential movement of about one inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur during construction as the dead loads are applied. Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of EC!, prior to placing forms or rebar, to verify that conditions are as anticipated in this report. Earth Consuhants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 8 Retaining and Foundation Walls Retaining and foundation walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the retained soils. Walls that are designed to yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five (35) pcf. For walls that are restrained from free movement the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to fifty (50) pcf. These values are based on horizontal backfill and that surcharges due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic, structural loads or other surcharge loads will not act on the wall. If such surcharges are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressure. Calculation of lateral resistance should be based on the passive pressure and coefficient of friction design parameters given in the previous foundation section. If it is desired to include the effects of seismic loading in the design, a rectangular pressure distribution equal to six times the wall height should be added to the above lateral earth pressure values. Retaining walls should be backfilled with a free-draining material conforming to the WSDOT specification for gravel backfill for walls (WSDOT 9-03.12(2)). The free-draining material should extend at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The remainder of the backfill should consist of structural fill. A perforated drain pipe should be placed at the base of the wall. Drain pipes should be surrounded by a free-draining soil that functions as a filter in order to reduce the potential for clogging. Drain pipes located in the free-draining backfill soil should be perforated with holes less than one-quarter inch in diameter. The drain pipe should be surrounded by a minimum of one cubic foot per lineal foot with three-eighths inch pea gravel. Alternatively, retaining wall drainage systems such as Miradrain could be used. If any such product is used, it should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slabs-on-grade should be supported on a minimum of one foot of imported granular structural fill, or one foot of cement treated on-site soil, or a combination thereof. Cement treatment of the subgrade, if used, should consist of mixing a minimum of 8 percent cement by weight into the upper twelve inches of subgrade soil. Slab-on-grade floors supported on a minimum of one foot of imported granular structural fill, or one foot of cement-treated.on-site soil, or a combination thereof may be designed for a mo ulus of soil subgrade reaction of three hundred fifty (350) pounds per cubic inch (pci). Earth Conaukants. Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 9 Concrete slabs resting on soil ultimately may cause the moisture content of the underlying soils to rise. This results from continued capillary rise and the ending of normal evapotranspiration. As concrete is =merle, moisture will eventually penetrate the slab resulting in a condition commonly known as a "wet slab", and poor adhesion of floor coverings may result. In our experience, these conditions rarely occur in dock-high, open air warehouses, except in areas were floor coverings are used. To minimize the potential for a wet slab, in areas where floor coverings will beus_ed, suitable moisture protection measure should be used. Typically, such protection measures include pTacemeiFt of a vapor barrier and a capillary break. A capillary break, if used, should consist of a minimum gf four inches of clean sand or washed rock. Samples of materials proposed for use as a capillary break should be submitted to us for review and/or testing prior to their use. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread and have been subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Such deep events have exhibited no ' surface faulting. Structures are subject to damage from earthquakes due to direct or indirect action. Direct action is represented by shaking. Indirect action is represented by movement of the soil supporting foundations and is typified by ground failure (rupture), liquefaction, or slope failure. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures with foundations founded in the liquefying soils. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid for short periods of time. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of groundshaking. Earth Consukants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 10 Based on the information obtain from our borings, the loose soils encountered during our field exploration consist of interbedded silts and silty sands. Given this information, it is our opinion that the potential for widespread liquefaction over the site during a seismic event is low. Isolated areas may be subject to liquefaction; however, the effect on structures is anticipated to be minimal if the recommendations contained in this report are followed. Should liquefaction occur, the liquefying zones would be several feet below the footings of the buildings. We estimate liquefaction induced settlement would be in the range of two inches, which is slightly higher than the estimated post construction settlements (1 .5 inches) discussed earlier. The UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, in our opinion a site coefficient of S3 = 1 .5 should be used for the static force procedure as outlined in Section 1634 of the 1994 UBC. For the dynamic force procedure outlined in Section 1629 of the 1994 UBC, the curve for Soft to Medium Clays and Sands (soil type 3) should be used for Figure 3, Normalized Response Spectra Shapes. Excavations and Slopes • The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration and laboratory testing, the soils expected to be exposed in excavations can be classified Type C as described in the current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. Therefore, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 .5H:1V or they should be shored. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria. Earth Conwhanu, Inc. l]tU I tUt1I111loi-ML CIVL711YCCIlhI i J I UU T Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 11 • Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. All permanently- exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage The site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. We suggest that the ground be sloped at a gradient oft of L,Pt fora distance of at least ten (mil feet away from the buildings, except in areas that are to be paved which can be, Jnna,._ad ar a gtadi .t of2 percent. If seepage is encountered in foundation or grade beam excavations during construction, the bottom of the excavation should be sloped to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as a nearby storm drain. Depending on the magnitude of such seepage, it may also be necessary to interconnect the sump pits by a system of connector trenches. Z---zoundation drains should be installed where landscaped areas are immediately adjacent to non dock-highp_ortions the building In our opinion, foundation drains are not necessary in areas where pavements extend to the building walls. The drains should be installed at or just below the bottom of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is provided on Plate 4. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the foundation drain system. Roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the foundation drain and downspout tightline systems. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 12 Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To provide a properly prepared subgrade for pavements, the subgrade should be treated and prepared as described in the Site Preparation and General Earthwork section of this report. At a minimum, the top twelve (12) inches of the subgrade should consist of imported granular structural fill suitable for use Burin wet weat ear con itions, compacted to 95 percent of the maximum ry ensity per ASTM D-1557- . It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still exist after this process. Therefore, a greater thickness of structural fill or crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. As an alternative to placement of a minimum of one foot of imported granular structural fill, consideration could be iven to cement treating the subgrade soil. Specific recommendations for cement treatment can be provided upon request. ' The following pavement sections are suggested for lightly-loaded areas: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule the following sections can be considered for truck- trafficked areas: • Tltgejinches AC over six inches of CRB • Three inches of AC over four and one half inches of ATB Asphalt concrete (AC), asphalt treated base (ATB), and crushed rock base (CRB) materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. Rock base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557-78 laboratory test standard. We suggest the use of Class B asphalt. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 13 Utility Support and Backfill T� site soils should provide adequate support for utilities located above the groundwater table. The soil that is located below the groundwater table may not provide adequate support i`t it present condition. The inability of soils located below the groundwater table to adequately support utilities would result from both the loose condition of the soil and the effect of the groundwater table de-stabilizing the trench bottom as the trench is excavated. Thus, if utilities will be located below the groundwater table, remedial measures will likely be required in order to provide adequate support. Remedial measures could include dewatering the trench, using steel sheeting to create a barrier of flow to the groundwater or placement of quarry spalls in the bottom of the trench as it is excavated. Use of a geotextile to provide separation between the native soils and quarry spoils may also be necessary if heaving soils are encountered. Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy compaction • equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12) inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting areas is presented on Plate 5. Trench backfill beneath building, parking and roadway areas may consist of native soils or imported materials provided they are near optimum moisture content as determined by our field representative. Based on current conditions, the majority of the on-site soil would require aeration to reduce the moisture content to near the optimum to allow compaction. During wet weather, a granular fill, as described earlier, should be used. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design information provided to us by you, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Zelman Development Company E-3000-3 December 8, 1997 Page 14 The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services As the geotechnical engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction specifications. ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. Earth Consultants, Inc. ii,v,,,•v•,x,/,''..,'‘,./,..•- "1--p'kiivy . 1... r.gwr ST 1 I id I .: ! I; . 4f 4'4•• tti ilkt'..'t••••KN‹‘: •,k‹..4.4. VA. • . I 1-j9 I I v tin ...,'...`..C'.'•••`••••••-:. t •i A r F. ..1 < . 1 t..1 Tyra cRi ,•1q..q....r,ey.r.5. , x.. .. r; i 1 f-11:1 \N -_, i • i. — 1.- ' t5 IN il ,-$R121 5I • . •-• • 4 sa..•4 4.....t....0 IA k E.n1M. flz. i ii 4 .1 ,. . . ,•.: . . . .,..• 1 .11 '...17, . . < " ! t.) • i• p E \ 17-1 ;\ :in-fric:,fft:N. '.‘`-• , s , ... i......,,,,,,.....r....,.., : & ::: •Nc -- , L iN i k ‘, . , • , , . . •.4„, .. . . , If \ d4 ii C '"P•. .. , , 7!-•1:.. •.....4_ ____. • . • t, fis• Okot • ..4 ' ‘h. r.ic''''••• • ' .....•,. •1/4e a a.v. 1• ••••1 \ Ni ---- ..\ \ ,- , ': '•.1.4....i.L'.•::-.4......,___ :i ...!—.1 % & i . • -- T ..-,/ .. i = i . ...-K. 'TN • et 1 '"----- - —--,......„.......ate t';'., • 1!. k- . i.-• I Zil ... . --. - ---., !,.... 01 1 1 - '. 1 7.74 TRECLl N._r 1$00.m., '.... i-.11 t ?•,' .1 1 ;!i. 'ofr....,NI I. . _ ... 5W - ' ../ )4' ‘ ''4 1 ! -.—........____. 1.1; 26 a. / --< i . 25 ,.,.. 4 k .--s ,A i, Ill rile It A lilti ‘111-1:4Stirt4;r t.'el 71 ' ' Ty4D:.sv_iata.cp., ... eR• 1 .:-A. • • , t•T CC On N ' t t' t . ! . ; ill t I A .--.-gt.....-.-..„,‘, ......_..1 ,1 V CO,* 1 ' , SD ;..... ...• IL Voti4K R It, 1 1 I (2 \ 4 .. wmuvrt UPLANO OA I i„ Z... . : ti 4. . ...:: EA/rPf tit Ili ' .,. ,„ , ,, cencA•cv 4A1111ir r/- flYrel• I ! ' ./ I 0 re le-JOJA-V/.#21 ' 4" • I :I 1.)t- i ! , i c,.. . i :I ....... _ ... .. . . 57 4 . i 14 •is . I f --f-',. , f.1 I / i ! iAltlidi .0a 4 til 0 - I I i :PW 44 _41ST. , SI VALLEV$ mut A4 It ." . °P i ' ;.''' cf.vit.1 I 1 6 i I II f •— # t f'` ;2i ....-" I ‘,.. / • SEGUE PARK Et ••VI ___ , ,......„Atar i.51 . I :1-' I • - • I) / r-64.-tr c.. ; f , I. es 4,4 . Z Ch I; • I '1 • 4 •CO 4:Zo / CV% r i v. r =,A < :.• lilt 5 tarn+)f '-.7-1Y. • •f--- Nti,' 1 T. 4 I cl.taCT <• I.. *4 • f 1 !'"....; •. INNY 4 i ! g 4, v• ; si :I • N ki / 31 i i -,(/hu•s .4-1 ,-$. 1 ... ys, 44.:.' ti#..W.P...OL • , F Nee 1 - 1. 1 lIZA... t 61 / 411 AlPilli r l' II I " t i .44,t,?..4.• , .s.LUffle..1 -..... t, , ki• I - % it. 1 • lerng ST 4,1 I % tom si ICI 1*--- 1 187111 RI- ). . itcre ' 'S —1:-- ic • g T i i it. 1.4.• I. .opor•_\ a. , ...1 1 ,..1 .,, _ ......._. . 4; t .7.eir 1 • , • .. •S 1104.. Sy kl tr...4‘.,v. .. g ri011.1 4, 1 itY24_FT.... i 1 I • . % V , t' e. 4 1111 4 . i( ' itti ) EarthConsultants, Nwri't N uu Mir f Ge*technimi Engi rs. iogals 4Envitonmeni Inc. l ScleaNsts Vicinity Map Reference: Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C King County/Map 41 Renton, Washington By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 1990 Drwn. GLS Date Oct.'97 Rel.No. 3000-3 Checked RAC Date 10/28/97 Plate 1 II 20 1 r------ RI- :`,.•"ik---'T -.-.• ---.*:--;1-..7-,:.?•.:.-% . Approximate Scale --!:2.-;5;;;:-L;':".::`;'.--"---.".-' ammo • - Nimm I .-i..:'...f::::7 _ .,, - 414,...i:1 _,_ 0 100 200 400ft. :: i.::.....y:.:... ..i.:..1L'i.;;;;.4.;;J:;:_s. l_EGEN_AD Lkilt:'=4*--',rir;-, 4 ittaV; ..4zi-',` ":','"-j,'":."-''''.!'..'F-; ft.45ntii.:41,3!±?:;'); ,:.-;;::25,S.-:.-, B-1 -4- Approximate Location Of /I 1::::::11- 4aVgi%:.:isf -,:--,.--,- ECI Boring, Proj. No. I. ::M.:Sk. M-.-'::: :i:::'.-f- '•::-..t.'-\''1: E-3000-3, Oct: 1997 io.nIiprf',. - s.:0',i•-::?: )1 TP TP-101-ii-Approximate Location of p)-- - ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. E-3000-3, Oct. 1997 TP-4116-7- G-101 • Approximate Location of ECI Grab Sample, Proj. No. E-3000-3, Oct. 1997 , -. I 1 13-1 -0- Approximate Location of i ECI Boring, Proj. No. i ,TP-115 E-3000, May 1986 -a- _ -62--/-- TP-1 -91- Approximate Location of 7P-6 I i--I EC! Test Pit, Proj. No. _ ..., E-3000, May 1986 < E--- Auto Fluff Area ,..;,:r.,.... r gg Wire Fluff Area //' ,', E3 Proposed Building 1 1 i 1 Existing Building J Boring and Test Pit Location Plan .__ Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C Renton, Washington flecked RAC I Date 10/30/97 I Plate 2 r L L SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ▪ i:• G�:i:i•.`:i{y is%a��rrA..').^' isis,U,.i_:i:;:::f�{•v'c?:•':::i�i: v.r. ..3 F•:-:,. ,��{{�ii E}` .,,..L r.v?iF>:. 'i:GJ!yv:::4::L{s.�j?'uW::lv'::}:jii.:'i:i<�:�4:�:SF.i ..�gN'yi$�4:i'"y'y..`Yi::wv}:i?�ca.`•{:,•3<ii��r:^}}:.,::}.r.:.a;:<. ..y.Y r,..+;.:<:}.r......r. „�.4:G':.,5.:...,;...::r.}s{:.?:.y:.>'r::.:'.. ,5.. ..}:i;]%:\4•yvr:{.%.:n::1r: f is it ii:i�:i ,f- y !<S::.4)h>FF.:Gi;:::,::::':!�:::::'::ijii.J 'W, '•ri)Ki:3:j!{:i;Y;in,v,�:,:�..vCt:{:{rn).:3.v!:.J..:.r.},<,...... :r.�{{}ii-:ij:'::iS}':�'n ::G}:%;•}}iiii:�}Liiii:)n-:Y.v'�}il3,v;:}''Xi jiSiii✓ .;,.}:{•rraA}i:::::.::::.:}:.v;!Sv;t^::.::.::.::}::h:.i:h:v :Lfii�.y�iii:':i::ii';-i�:k<�i}i: ��<-.j:3. ,. . (.<+-::., ::<:;s:•::G . r.}..s;;};k�::�:>::>::<i::>:::<::<-r;':»:::;;::; Surcharge or Preload nF..ryrai:.L'Y.. t}\l{Ovp.�:;CGfv}."F4jn :?it{�j:�:::.iF ..�>�}:v'vv.t>e.�.,.F ..:} f::.::... J Surcharge or Preload F,f ,• y�r,}-�:»> �> w;r:>: x<: x4i.r J<•;.,:::.:....:.: :<;>:::>::«: : Fill .""'�6'` '. 't'' er .: 'rai'r 'nC:.:: :Cu{... x+`-��5�?/:�.v. ��•4`'�^„'{;:t i?:.}vv){r.i:)%:r.:i% iY' r},»'' ? '. 2'}Y!v�•�r:�;'ii y� �/y�� F':"JG4. .' £.,✓,i%+r�, 3cf "'>:�' ai:):,ti'3,c::..4 F171 \"r •v ' U .' K{!i:.. ti LyLy'.. �T y�.�N� Y`:•)t.i.; ":J:v.:}i �.Y..}::' �yyv.;4::... �r �5. '+ .}vif>Yu. +„}.'i;rr,}•:�r Gi:?xG$`YhJG-.t.Y''o` •�j,•,y-i$; t::y::.}:::::�{:a;c:rf :::<:'':i:n:Y:t;�{ :::.': .}.a.G...}}?:.; . ...}.,.:::::f.:. �%�r:::�t::'`;?;::::i�::i)`.:3i:::::`:`.^•::;:::..}:....},c;i:::i::'::t::;:>:i: ::::;::;{ ?...y. '•nCh'U .v.i`a}::ia,v,.:Y•}''rn<:-vkJ: `iji4iYn rkiv vf/-. '.fr•!i .vrSn},v,;3}}},v,:.} ...3 ':3r!} .r:�m.+L:N:. ]p .h.nifL•::i }id-'n �KW. , 'M �'�':h:4..}r ni it}Yv y;ti?h 40.0040024.411M.20:ijiyk:::'r'::itii•:•}rr. +•.✓.:: 2:`+ti;}ri�(� ��:'aY:v::&i✓.:cq>'yc�.)t�f{::.yyr,✓:t} :oYati_ :: :�:;} ;lf.} M%::: %n}!rr}:.4)ari':?• ��c�ttyy h+L:{N•hi:,'%'\3.y'.,�...K.>, }.}7:} _ r .} r;ni`{. 3.5:rG'•. G: .}}a�cruy,7�f,:y?y,$•ix :n:r G�:?. :.ri:`Vy. ,,af}t�•+.v�:fP :u,.. .. :4i::,a: "�`• nkv'�'k.� C;}4.`.:<a::.... ,N 4.n V•..,.•.:•:::. - JI?rw i'�.,�.p'.ia6x 'OhM ::r Gi fS{it' �i%r::.:;c•a2: / .:t}{ {W'/:}':ti:>.r x{: �•`' +,r:.... A.v '�K, a}? ry}.?.•...., f.:- J'-yJF b}i>i.r;'L}.;. }'.:^:.... S'}3}::,,:'•'+:�h • v::is:?j .ir'0fy • rS,if• N{Mc'ac�,,3��...•?c3},.,a".,4: Fl`yatwi}} �:4..�;yA::;i{:<y ::-R:.i.�rX:i i`t;�,"'f::•.•: .}&ter: r�l.:..:. .u.i'F"F`•?.:'n-�,cx:✓:� h aS`:=?'��i::;:�`�ii%r,;.v ;`:.fi,(;:{.': 'r. i-':.}: `>.Lf•,ru3i+c::')}�.✓""c{i�iq'�„�.:?n'r,•:i::3} ':`:> d�•.S- '�`.-- }. :ily; M3;:S:J.+•.: 'ti: 4i::••: }:3:'?.•c:$;i 4,:.3i•:: t '�{.:Gr JYv-f•:.::g(c:?{ui.?::. I11 =1I1 - F-.1117- STANDARD NOTES 1) Base consists of 3/4 inch thick, 2 foot by 2 foot plywood with center drilled 5/8 Inch diameter hole. 2) Bedding material, if required, should consist of Traction Sand. 3) Marker rod is 1/2-Inch diameter steel rod threaded at both ends. 4) Marker rod Is attached to base by nut and washer on each side of base. 5) Protective sleeve surrounding marker rod should consist of 2 inch diameter plastic tubing. Sleeve is NOT attached to rod or base. 6) Additional sections of steel rod can be connected with threaded couplings. 7) Additional sections of plastic sleeve can be connected with press-fit plastic couplings. 8) Steel marker rod should extend at least 6 inches above top of plastic sleeve. 9) Marker should extend at least 2 feet above top of fill surface. TYPICAL SETTLEMENT MARKER DETAIL � , • , Earth Consultants Inc. Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C °eol` Engin &Environmental ""'" Renton, Washington Prof. No. 3000-3 Drwn. GLS Date Oct. '97 Checked RAC Date 10/30/97 Plate 3 • ° • o ,___— Slope To Drain :::;P o ; . . • W ° - Jr .Y i •°• ° • 6 inchlmin. •.� ° ° •°a o'• a -' .._ ° 18 inch min. •; • : • ' o .• eo 4 inch min. ,••• • - Diameter Perforated Pipe' :•.,:•;_ :o = • - Wrapped in Drainage ,'�, - • • ' " Fabric „ „ _ • _ t t 2 inch min. • 2 inch min. / 4 inch max. 4 12 inch min. SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING LEGEND §,. 4 ' Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. • Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the I. WSDOT Specifications. O Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down;tight jointed; with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. I' f ��,\Y TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL \((���e�, , Earth Consultants Inc. Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C WJ/�1U n1� `°°'°a "�' "°"&`° " """'�""�" Renton, Washington Proj. No. 3000-3 I Drwn. GLS I Date Oct. '97 Checked RAC I Date 10/30/97 I Plate 4 Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or Areas Roadway Areas h — ` f' o • e Varies _ 95 ° o. 0•o 85 4 95 " 1 Foot Minimum { Backfill ' z 80 90 ` • `� Varies i _ ;15.• - - - "ice /:+•" A 'o Cf•ti,;..' PIPE -i-. 41 • .5o.,p•'' i. :J o•-.00'. • ao;o.. •-.• 6q••. ti p. .o Bedding a :;•o••...b ' o...000...Oooa.• : ..••o0•0• 060,o.•. •y C ( � Varies 'o. •oho •....y ..c.o�.o• •: O.o.•o•o 9•.0 j 00 ••• 00000/�o0s••0y-)00.0 -P..:.Q•0 vn Cno•_Qo.�QonUi Q0 .V.a.;o•i,•o1.7•oeO LEGEND: 17-15-&-A-7--cr.--'_.1.; Asphalt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab 0.0 .•• . o , •••• . Base Material or Base Rock Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill 1:-,,,:::.::,i';',;;;f:::,4i..:il i*-:: =- Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General `t ~ Earthwork Section of the Attached Report Text. 95 Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. .�t Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and 5•'���` Rec ndat ons for Type o Laying ommethe Bedding ould fP p Conform Se ected the Manufacturers ,4,,.. C. I TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL �nitEarth Consultants Inc. Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C f/ `'o•`•e""dE"°"K'i Getii0gists I.Firnminmencal SnennusRenton, Washington Pro). No. 3000-3 I Drwn. GLS I Date Oct. '97 Checked RAC 1 Date 10/30/97 Plate 5 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION E-3000-3 Our field exploration was performed on October 20 and 23, 1997. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling four borings and 21 test pits. The borings were drilled by Associated Drilling and the test pits were excavated by Northwest Excavating, using a track- mounted excavator. Approximate exploration locations were determined relative to existing landmarks. Approximate locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The locations of borings and test pits performed in 1986 are also shown on Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an individual from our firm who classified the soils encountered and maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate Al , Legend. Logs of the borings and test pits are presented in the Appendix on Plates A2 through A38. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Earth Consuttantu, Inc. Boring Log Project Name: Sheet of Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C 1 2 Job No. Logged by: Start Date: Completion Date: Boring No.: 3000-3 RAC 10/23J97 10/23/97 B-1 Drilling Contactor: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Associated HSA SPT Ground Surface Elevation: Hole Completion: ±24' ❑ Monitoring Well ❑ Piezometer ® Abandoned,sealed with bentonite u _ w No. - o .c ti o Surface Conditions: BLOWS a. E 4 4- (.4 E (%0 Ft. ) t`O ❑ N ] N SM (Topsoil to 4") Fll Ip•Gray silty fine SAND, loose, wet, considerable wood, plastic, 1 — glass debris, some slag 2 .—.. 3 7.4 5g -through debris at 3.5'to 4.0' 4 SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND with gravel;medium dense,wet LL-35 PL-29 PI-s 12.9 18 -6'coarse sand lense 6 7 ML Gray SILT,loose, saturated 8 40.0 5 9 10 -increasing sand and sandy silt.very lose, groundwater table 39.7 2 encountered 11 12 26-1 8 `+' 13 SP-SM Blaci poorly graded fine to medium SAND, loose,water bearing 15 -increasing silt, some silty sand 11.0 11 "Q 16 d. 0 17 a . 18 v. c a 19 • Q a " BoringLog 1-11(-• Earth Consultants Inc. Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C Ceesechnleale "'°".``obg11 `a"ti°n°ers''Scientism Renton,Washington Proj.No. 3000-3 _ wn. - D GLS Date Nov. '97 Checked RAC Date 11/3/97 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log Project Name: Sheet of Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C 1 t Job No. Logged by Date: Test Pit No.: 3000-3 DSL 10J20 97 TP-121 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: N.W. Excavating Notes: o t ! 0 o Surface Conditions: Grass W L n + ' a. o .c (90 a - % 7 ) O N O 0 0 ��� SM FILL: Muffler, metal debris, brown and gray silty SAND with gravel, � S•� dense, moist ii •••• •�•�•� 2 -coke cans • .st. 111 16.3 �: 3 -plastic ���• •� 4 -brick debris •.:•:• ��� •••. s -pipe fitting ••���� 6 ML Gray SILT, medium dense, moist L1=38 PL=30 36.8 P1=8 8 9 10 -caving due to seepage 38.7 11 -becomes wet and dense 12 13 Test pit terminated at 13.0 feet below existing grade.Groundwater table encountered at 13.0 feet during excavation. r �k a, Test Pit Log 4 a Earth Consultants Inc. Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C cr J/ IliGeolechnical engineers,Geologble envleonmerol_ Renton,Washington d Proi.No. 3000-3 own. GLS Date Nov. '97 Checked RAC Date 11/3/97 Plate A30 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. BORING NO. 1 Logged By RWB Date 5/10/86 ELEV. +141-US Depth (N) W As -Built Graph Soil Description Sample Blows Well CS (ft.) Ft. '�°) Diagram `'c sm Silty SAND,• brown, loose, moist _ I 5 22 ' ',.• •- Q • u .= J- I •� 2-&;: .,� .S.: ?... sp SAND, dark gray, medium to fine, medium - 10 A :; dense, wet. - 1 L-.• :... ' .. s Silt % increases with depth grading to _ _..1_ ' n silty sand _ 15 ,�.� :•l::'• V 1 15 •••••L ..lC -1.1'� y . �♦ ,thy. 'y —25 Oy. ^ a - e-. a :a , I. ° •••` L:••• 1 ... 30 ° ;il! ,i ml Sandy SILT, light gray, medium dense, )..•••. some organic fragments, wet 11 s,....-Ne::. • - :•:::.gin; -,-I :;a.. lil ii - i 19 . ; 1 II* `: - 40 .• :v. :'%'�: spSAND, dark gray, medium to fire, dense - T 52 to very dense, wet =45 :4iii• O —50 50 n:. _ = 31 ':i : • -55 f1: sm _ 1. ..`'_ - -1.- 3 0 E:•. . r' Total Depth = 58.5 feet (B) denotes bentonite pellets I BORING LOG 1.- '• !;;.. STERNOFF METALS PROPERTY I, v, RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth 1 '1, ,•i Consultants Inc. • I" GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3000 Date May'86 Plate A31 BORING NO. 2 Logged By RWB Date 5/10/86 ELEV. +14± (N) As - Built Graph CS Soil Description Depth Sample Blows (aW Well t. Ft. Diagram sm Topsoil, silty SAND, brown • L,' IC:“.{:-.:,:. = 5 32 •• v• . �. act • m .> > [c} � Silty SAND, brown/mottled, medium to — 5 •v 11.1".".I•i" fine, subangular to subrounded, loose, - ' iii I wet = 6 30 '` a 411 t; 311i If�1 Al ... . ,,ism - f f ffff.c} - SZ I 4 `� ' <f(fr( <.fci RE 4:ii — 15 � 1:4•i . medium dense _ ;'' '_ #i 1p 22 ui:: • ;1 :ii 3#31: — 20 :o=:• am?;0::; ` tf .fkccf. — 25 ''•-4::_' �'.rr hrfrr - ro: • • P fff� dense - F: �:k.; :i± T 35 Total depth = 29 feet (B) denotes bentonite pellets 1 BORING LOG I+ ((I/P..1 `\ STERNOFF METALS PROPERTY " li„ RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth 1 , Consultants Inc. • • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3000 Date May' 86 Plate A32 BORING NO. 3 Logged By RWB DateELEV. +14± 5/10/36 (N) As- Built Graph CS Soil Description �fP;h Sample Blows (�) Well Ft. Diagram /' <<<` sm Silty SAND, bluish-gray, medium dense, : 17 '•'.'• '°q K (fill) , noticeable odor - = 30 • . • e , -"'` sm Silty SAND, gray, loose, wet, some odor _ 5 ",,B..st tekt i 4 7 ;.. ` —10 t`_�r}':r � sm Silty SAND - Q •• - - :•�, • —15 • .•'°'. s. :� ..a mh Clayey SILT, tan, soft, some organics _ ••�= Rird _SILT and PEAT - _ 12 ` '� : ••••••" i <<• t:<<::''. sm Silty SAND, gray, fine, loose to medium : T 10 20 ^ ;� r} dense - _l_ :�. . :• : C •''' j —2 5 or;•• —,— • •: .: - = 12 .o::.. 'c; • t —30 ] 1110,.. mi./rah Clayey SILT, tan, medium high, plastic, 12 17 •;,_ --- �sme•_ar.;arks —35 :; sm Silty SAND, medium to fine, dense, wet : 47 •' Total depth = 44 feet (B) denotes bentonite pellets BORING LOG i;• i ,; STERNOFF METALS PROPERTY II RE\TO`, :JaSHINGTON Earth Consultants Inc. ` :'' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Prof. No. 3000 Date May'86 Plate A33 BORING NO. 4 Logged By RWB ELEV. +14± Date 5/14/86 US (N) Graph CS Soil Description D fp'h Sample Blows (�1 l'(IIIIII•ii� - 9 3 2 ' ftL ml Sandy SILT, gray, some clay. Brick iIII'�(ii' rubble at surface, mottled, low — 5 Q (��' Ij plasticity - 1 i I 4 35 —10 _1 2 r_ _i. ——— —1 5 ....7.—= pt PEAT; brown fibrous, very soft, wet = �_ - I 13 30 ITRII sm Silty SAND, gray, medium to fine, 20 • medium dense, wet - I , 15 �.. :....+ —2 5 .,....I...l.--- - ol SILT, gray, very soft, organic, wet 2 1111111i 1-4 - . 111 iI 1I1 of Tan SILT —_ —30 I 1 {` - `q.: - T 0 ..� t #.�'�� sin Silty SAND, gray, medium to fine - _J__ �E.: , � sand, very loose to medium dense, wet _35 ..;;;1: - = 16 16 .}::t1-ref 1. 4 c c .•ft•F�:�: { 11 - = 21 22 f WYkkr�cEut: T 29 Total depth = 49 feet BORING LOG VSTERNOFF METALS PROPERTY (lik, RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth Consultants Inc. • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3000 Date May' 86 jte A34 BORING NO. 5 Logged By RWB ELEV. +14± Date 5/14186 Depth (N) W US Soil Description D ft � Sample Blows (%1 Graph CS Ft. dijl'::; ml SILT, brown, soft, wet _ 5 30 I1i1I'l:1 — _ __ -- — 5 I I.I __ Q ;fs '4 f:: _ I. 3 25 t� sm Silty SAND, brown to tan, fine sand, I.c}}:..I:.j;;l;j; loose to medium dense - = 2 22 1111111.4 13.1E! .1:: —15 fi#{f:}i:; - = 24 qictfr�� Cj: it: :,: ;� —25 33 {+333 ii-;n:•:ii T 25 }}t{:}:}}f' Total depth = 29 feet BORING LOG i STERNOFF METALS PROPERTY • RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3000 Date May'86 'Plate A35 TEST PIT NO. Logged By RWB Date 5/10/86 Elev. +14± Depth W (ft,) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 FILL �wo N/A FILL, unit consists of shredded non-metalic auto i'i'i'i parts in sand/silt matrix. Unit is gray and wet .�5�5. ...I4 •'•'�'i 5 •SS) •..1 .'•'.'W SZ �i:�:' sm Silty SAND, bluish gray, medium to fine, loose, _ occasional clay-silt inclusions 10 - Total depth = 9 feet _ 15 Logged By RWB Date 5/10/86 TEST PIT NO. _a__ Elev. +14+ 0 •••• �:%• : N/A FILL, mixture of steel slag mixed with native soil, �•;•;• traces of oil ••. i..•• • •••'•' ••.••• • 5 •••• - i. ml/mh Clayey SILT, bluish gray, mottled, soft, medium plasticity, moist 10 — Total depth = 8 feet 15 TEST PIT LOGS i' j ;. STERNOFF METALS PROPERTY • RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth :,; Consultants Inc. • V�' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY I Proj. No. 3000 I Date Kay'86 'Plate A36 TEST PIT NO. - Logged By RWR Date S/1O/86 Elev. +14__ Depth W (ft.) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 sm FILL, silty sand, black with some oil - II!;1I ml SILT, tan with fine sand, loose, non-plastic, illy, - : 1 moist 5 —11 Total depth = 6 feet 10 ---1 ` - 15 RWB Logged /1 TEST PIT NO. �_ Elev. +14± Date 5/10/86 0 '-cc 4»} II »ra•ivt: ml/ Sandy SILT, brown to tan, loose to medium dense, • ��4� H !I sm some roots II —0 II • 5 =• . _ Total depth - 5 feet 10 — 15 TEST PIT LOGS ', STERNOFF METALS PROPERTY i 11 * •I RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth Consultants Inc. 0` GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3000 Date May'86 Plate A37 TEST PIT NO. _a__ Logged By RWB Date 5/10/86 +14± Elev. Depth W (ft) USCS Soil Description (%) 0 N/A FILL, debris includes ash-slag, brick, concrete • and scrap iron - ill � ---- ---- � l ml SILT, bluish-gray, slightly mottled, occasional 5 — 1 organics, noticeable H2S odor Total depth = 7 feet 10 — 15 Logged By Rtn'B Date 5/10/86 TEST PIT NO. 6 Elev. +14= 0 ;I }} �. ml/ Sandy SILT, brown, fine, loose, moist - ') sm -sm.:: I� - ---- - ----- 5 —j1JJ1J ml Clayey SILT, brownish-gray, mottled, soft, moist � �� to wet - Total depth = 7 feet 10 — 15 TEST PIT LOGS i.i\` (.. STERNOFF METALS PROPERTY • RENTON, WASHINGTON Earth s; Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 3000 Date 1ay'86 1Plate A38 < a. a.1 Z C 0:1 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS E-3000-3 Earth Consultants, Inc. • SIEVE ANALYST HYDROMETER ANALYST S 1 '1, SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH.U.S,STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM O r' ) - O O O O p O O O tD M bS2O N {O O M Np 0 O O O O O DM N r1 . Sapp \ WV_Ni 0 i_% 100 I 1 = II - w O 0 ql!) 90 , _ ' . . 1 20 o 5 .p 80 ` + - - - , m - n _ I ; LI _ 1II 1 t 30 m DJ Z 70 J m N i T1 t I I I ItI ` . L 40 '"I t -n 60 1 L 1;1 1 C.)r Z - , O Z i 40 '� r 60 o �. � m . n = - © 7o- m ..D --I 30 _ S 20 - \ , _ ., - ' 80 H x- N C • , J d 90 a 10 I ` azi n 0 1 I _ 1 j,1 I 1 I 1 L1 1 LI L 1 I ' ll_I I u 1 - - r 1 I - _ 100 ID O 0 O v M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 03 lD v M N r COID N • CC? M NO O O O O O O O rL1 O O O CO 10 v MN �- `S. O • 0 0 0 0 O O Ct to > M N r GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • 0 0 n 2 a ''cr< 2 COBBLES COARSEGRAVEL FINE COARSE MEDIUM J FINE FINES SAN D • 1 N r a a m r In it Moisture . A Z KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL r rD N D Test Pit No. (ft,) • r J 0• ?' m 25.0 -- -- 0 B-1 25 SP-SM Gray poorly graded SAND m cc °: a --- B-3 12.5 SM Gray silty SAND 30.8 -- -- ID a Sti w n O"""'••• • B-4 5 SM Brown and gray silty SAND 6.6 -- -- r B-4 15 SM Black silty SAND 30.0 -- -- • SIEVE ANALYST_ HYDROMETER ANALYST o SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MCSH PER INCH U,S, TANDARO _ GRAIN SIZE IN MM O. C - .� Affp p o 0 pp W �D Oa N Z C‘It0 ai CO N q- ��. rl' ?� �j a0 N f`') tt tQ c00 0�0 0 0 O O O, O p. O O w *-----)k ' ' ''• '`.. .- . --. , 4 4 , , O t' ) 90 ( ( LI 10 1 x n - , ' m f. ^ m 70 _ 30 n l J 1 d m ✓ O z Z1 60 k — 40 '� t C z 1 n i 0 C 50 50 m x ( { - ` 1 - m O E .-. * 40 60 t , CO n 0 , . k. D : • ; 130 } 70 m_ n _ C) co 0 a 80 -=I n N cor _ _ a _ + , W 10 90 n ro( PiI ILIII I I I _ r LI LI 1 1 1 1 _I 1'I flr I '1 L ' LI I_[ 100 (D 0 O o O O O O O O O O co tD V th N r- CO tD v Pi N '- CO30 ? 0 N 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 W (0 M N O O O O O O O O O O O O rt. CD > rn NGRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • O O 00 0 0 0 a rt z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE '< cn COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES E ro N - P) N m r to PI 'i' r fD Z KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS • DESCRIPTION Moisture LL PL N Content (%) J r'f O (n ->, Cl) 0 TP-101 1 SM Brown silty SAND 20.0 -- -- iv a 0 TP-101 10 ML Gray sandy SILT 21.6 -- -- m n N 0 TP-103 1 ML - Brown SILT 35. 3 -- -- .� SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALY. O. SIZE OF OPENINQIN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH. U.S,STANDARD, GRAIN SIZE IN MM I t's . o ,p . O 1p O O O 0 0 O$ $ �`'� N r 0 O o p Z t0 0 nov M N 03 ri .� f 7 ? a N f) sf to tD co r O O O O p O O O O O O O 90 ` . F 10 m 1 , L 1 I Y 1 l 1 0 : 51) . 80 - t 1 , ', I , I I I I 111 I 1 1 20 n A Y I 1 ' I ; I I m n m 70 ' I _ 1 - 1 1 - 1 I ' I 30 n v' z Dr so j I 1 I - 1_ 1 i _ I 1 40 -I _ 1m 1 I 1 c) ( I \ - n . - 0 f o , 50 T I 1 50 d n co I , 1 1 - - cn (!') A . - t I I1 - JJ Z m 40 I I ; a ' I I A _ I , so CO 1 ' . -< ' 2 30 AA 70 H m_ _Ammi_ 1 . I L7 C) A , i 2 20 I 80 --1 X- CD f9 r 0- ; a 10 , - A 90 o iv 7:7 K • o 1 1 1 I I I I I I LL I I 1 I I I UIII I 1 1 11 1 1 100 (D D 330 O O O O O O O O OWW VMN r Co. to Q Cl N ' OD O O M N O O O OT M N .O� r 000WD OMN ." rt CDD > M N r GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a P Z is)m fn COBBLES COARSEGRAVEI FINE COARSE I MEDIUM SAND I FINE FINES r0 N r a a rn r K \ r 0 Z Boring or DEPTH Moisture D KEY Test Pit No. (ft.1 USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL LA (n r. J rt -,< O Y to � i . m co "v [o 0 TP-104 5.5 ML Brown SILT 34.1 -- cir CD a 6--- TP-105 10 SM Brown silty SAND 11.4 -- co () w 0 TP-106 5 ML Gray SILT 30.4 e • HYDROMETER ANALYSS SIEVE ANALYST --� GRAIN SIZE IN MM SIZE OF OPENING_iN 1NCHS I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH,VS,STANDARD _ ,c g M o 0 ° r �' ?Y o ,. o oor 88 8$ $o do, o o Qo0 08. O. 00 _ 4.-• N M p 100 d r) N �.- I0 ..-����L" _ O --� ......... o •k\ IMINIMINIMMITTRr 1 10 o '`� 90 �_�w■nNwwmmo nmummem Imrmmimnmmllmlmmuimimomnnmmmuuumommsmimnnn 20 } l" IIIMMIMMMMIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMM 80 « �■�u�--w� m INIMMIIIMMINIMUISINIM www■�_ ��—■■i�Iw�■■�Mlw■•_■N m �MN�mmi1•■1•_ _ ? m 70 —� I� �w■■ 30 m DO n Z w■ww■ww■ ��w� �■■, ■��■■w z ■ww N •aw■■mi r j O —I ww■w�,■�■w w�w���smw�w■ww�w■w�w�w��iiim� a0 to -n 60 ■"'■'■"'�■�ww■■■wwl■w■■I��wNO �+ w■■ . n 0- r- ■w '■'MIMI ww■� ■ o �-- m �� �=■■■Iww�w�■:�w� 50 70 50 mow— In CO �� II- m ,,� Mew—�f1• z k 40 ■ -w�wlw■■■■ MM so CO m 111 =►' ~ n C)2 ��wNw■ I 70 m %D 2 30 —-.1 =w—w� M n INIMINIMINIMINKIII INIINAMI 111111111111111.1.1.1.1 80 1 ? 20 1 NINIMIIIMININIMMIENI n N 09 m • 90 (1) 1-.a 10NIMINIMMIIIMIIIMMI a 1.111111111111111.1.111.111 a n PE, ■M■■■■I i IU1 100 IINIMMIMMIIIMMEI ���■■�wwMM��■■ww� 00 to v C') N r O o 8 o N 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 (D 0 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 O lD V f") N O 00 t0 M N . 0 0 0 0 0 0 PO D CI N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS O O n Z COARSE [ FINE COARSE ! MEDIUM [ FINE I FINES I ? K cr, I COBBLES GRAVEL SAND E ro m Moisture \a r cp Z KEY Boring or DEPTH USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL J rt N - Test Pit No. Vt.1 O 5, to ��., 7 m 15. 3 -- - -iv 5in—'-- TP-111 1 ML Brown sandy SILT 19.3 -- -- \,m 0 32.2 -- -- 0 TP-112 1 ML Brown SILT PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT J 1 a. 1 1 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 r N M V In to n co O1 L00 L00 J I I J I 410 zoo. _ _ - ' Zoo' a,o (/) .., tT Q) o Z2 , , .._ ._ . - 0 < 900 - -- - _ _ 900' N (11 N 800 800' Z 1- 7) LO' - - ____ Lo. LT L11 Z 2Q 0 `� cc " zip' 1- . , _ . _ zo CI >- CO* .— - — £0• I 170' 170. 90' -, -_ 90' a 00Z - --, - i 80- cc �.� umL• ZO Q H , OOL I/ CC w a N 08 z•~ - E 09, � _ . _ 2 v, 6 os - - F w ,o J a as Z / . v.2- o If. OZ r /l _ , - • 8•N o w 3 (~an ,J fly r. w w 9L I ti / - Z H W. f Q � oL i III/// z cc w m �w 8 cc > ZZ / ... £ O I ' 4 V al C7 w 'h ? 19 N - > a 8 w (n z z LJJ,411,1 % I ' . . ,, — =0L 2 ryBRi oz ~ CC w" Z r+ a o`yell ,OV Oct rn H H o z C.) c a 1 1 a. u. • 09 8 tfi a H Ea-, w £ . . OH 0]F- N • 00L fn coLu m Y 00Z 0 O Q ZL - - 00£ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ol co N co In v M N PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES I\( ` 'i 1 Earth Co nsultants Inc. Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C ;ii ' 1ii (i�W((1wl.l ,..rrs.(111.1.(i4}i Ens1"11r1r.11.11ScinNiw Renton, Washington Proj. No.3000-3 Drwn. GLS J Date Nov. '97 I Checked RAC I Date 11/4/97 I Plate B5 ` 100 80 x 60 w 0 r P 40 A-Line 20 one CL-ML ID S I 0 20 40 60 80 100 LIQUID LIMIT Natural Key Boring/ Depth Soil Classification USCS L.L. P.L. P1. Water Test Pit (ft) Content • B-1 7.5 Gray SILT ML 35 29 6 34.7 • B-2 10 Gray SILT ML 37 31 6 37 .5 Atterberg Limits Test Data 4+!` j. 44 Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C lh'� (�, a Earth Consultants Inc. Renton, Washington Ge Iect Englnoers.ceo+oska&DIWormmal S<.en is s 100 1 80 x 60 w 0 40 —A-Line a. Q - I© 20 01161 • CL-ML 43e,® 0 20 40 60 80 100 LIQUID LIMIT Natural Key Boring/ Depth Soil Classification USCS L.L. P.L. R I. Water Test Pit (ft) Content • TP-109 4 Gray SILT ML 36 28 8 37.1 A TP-113 1 Brown SILT ML 42 30 12 42.2 III TP-115 5 Brown SILT ML 36 29 7 35.4 0 TP-117 5 Gray SILT ML 38 31 7 39.5 6 TP-121 7 Gray SILT ML 38 30 8 38.2 Atterberg Limits Test Data y 'i �� Earth Consultants Inc. Zelman Property Parcels A, B and C !J Geotectinical Engineers.� ,«,,Scientists Renton, Washington Proj. No.3000 3 Date Nov. '97 I Plate B7 VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS g ) • . . (f) ; e • Z co. <t. '0 as ! g ;4 / - • CO . C -0 ... -..v. • / < g •C E cs tO. , •. p " I 8 ., - CO t• Go m A g fq c rs 4.. c: • 4.----:)....40:-, . ? CI) Ida 8 g c 12 . ir- ..G 8 --. ..• .,ti. • -. ..... ... - -. < 2 1 • . I; ! 1 ..., -.' ' ' .a.4" Z " 2coo oh= A,.8''i I; .. g 0 I • ,,,, . ,, I., "",,,q,- • Ili li; 1. ,,_..: . IV •, • .. .. ,. )1 .1•• : 1 •1! •''/,'. : I: 11 ••i , . .. . . i i ',.• , , •• •-•••,-?;,,,. .t. It? I . , '1,.,s'')r.:' .:' ' , 1 -• ,.., . i ..' . % ,• . . ...I. \ , I / V •y••••'4(.. .,i• . Z ' ii .'r.j. • \\ ":Alt.Zi. ---...t.,c.,:,.; 'k. i ., '--. .',Cry..i..' '"...• '. • •.„. , ‘,. i i'‘ s-• I'i. ,..•• , 1 1.IS ..•.- V.. . 1'11 ..I IS I° • " •i i•'. '•:.....1' r I'? r` ' i _. x Ca $'°. J1 i'l 4r(. j i • -I ... : • fir. •../ r.....1 ; ....s. - _., clao ., . _.4. _ . - , ‘,.„. i \. 'V. M .1." • 1 ° ,1 •' 1 1 11 :- .., . . . •i ittzt.', F •,..• •,.,. . fk" ...i ..‘,, \ . \,....-. • I, ...... .. .... ... i -,,,,...,----"k• - _.. lr 1 1 ‘ i k;. b • i , 1 i 1 ... '' 1 \\.a '•,. .47,_,• e ( ,li \ i' -- -A \.--..."*"••• • l. r. , . • ., ( • N.'' • ; II t\ 1 •I0 :.Y 1,, .....', , i i •7-.. -.• • 1- :I'• AS / 1 •. .t A -. • /11N/ N' /••••• • '-.. • .. '.: *7 h II / • ..,.." .. :f 1 ,./ i:' ..%/ t4 \ 1 1 li It 1 . II I A' ..... -i) I e'l rot, \. .1 - / l,. t li / / 1t'.) 11 • ,. ., ' 11 I li ,.'..1i / 1,1 1 k, JO I 17 .4/ • , 4" 1 r 7.' • r' ' J...Z III I 1 I ? l• .\.• ." 1/• 7 I . .." 'rfteN,.:I - -- 1, \ ( / 1.>,....1 ..... i v rifrt .,• % i. .4.- s .) i j II 1 t. CO 1 1 oirri II • ?--4,V"-' ; •- / 1 S \ 71 1,,,< • li 'I . / • . I (II .1 / I )1 - • 11 ...... (44,,, 11 ii 11, . ,....- . 4r ir 8 '...r.f.-....f., .„.......„... .'(......• it •/:'''..71.. Y'ti j.c, ,0-- --- S i , • 1 I .J f ( ;'.• > 1' $1.!. 1J) / CC 1 ! -,,r r.._\ ..0 p 1---... c;• r ,.- --- s., . li 1 1 •. 1 ) i) r , N $ '1'l : 11 V / I /1"L. ....,.16..- ./. - 1`.. . e ' • .erlip°. . • 1 41 p,•.,-swim , (1,., *., / / •. 111-, ,, 1 p i ':-4e 6 i-- :s - Cl') I 1 IL.1 !..._ CC thi. .; To- !", ) t. r*I•trt< i il ,.1 .•-ff• .... -.- I l' g < I i ff •i S .•I 1-••••,... ' • .(I.,or, . ••••Imir I."' , '4fef / ; .." CC) • i if • : I /V? . 1 r'IIM 1 ......17...:••••-.I''N.? .12,111111‘j #4 . . I: ",..,L_ . If k ) , -------4,- - • 4 v. 7 •..,- 1 " • .i „I If . ....... r,., • • .1N11/ 11• pp .'N ,00'*. -- -.., . . - i,, Z '\ ) ,e ! ,j.........*••••.LiZtr‘ ••••„...... 0.6:::::r ' Altfir I \, •"li 11 Tthrolt . /. "i' •.1 )11111110 11 \ \ 10'Fr iki ••• 10Ik • \ -,-1 ',.• • b eg ig •'', . .. • 1 l / . liprie.. Mill 14 sdir ..,...XriALNIJIIF, i ... I$ I ? ihr4erj g Or , , ..r. •4. lit‘,4, ' I '‘1111 1400"Slikeilliklittill 1411)41111. ) IS . 411kr',. f, W .4111t:iii' I ( li /I) .i A" YI,14 I I reii 1 I li 11 i r 1 . 4 -n11110 . 4 . ,41,10.ipitil i.t. , . 1 , ..,;kW"' 4stritilialliiik. Ilpii r ,, i , .-... • .... 40004111 . -t) "111 i 1 :Arad - \-r .. ,,; 01:iz-..-,:x,,-.1. . ,P54171,1%,_ &at' • e,.,/7--, : 4, ,' -1 1 ., 9 ff 1 IP P' "1411714r47 . : PA1r,, n t` 7.:Ti :I- 1 AI t . - r ' .40. 4. .. .4i s li .--1 6 . • II, i - .. 1. .4 1 i / 84 dir . -' Ai ' ; ... ,k5Niell i •-•1 ; it jo " te, I 1 ,..• . taiiiiiiponii-ciewia,t.nexcra-mcii Iv•.3.1pris. . Ma i .1 c . ....d1 11•411" INImmithi e . •... itleildirpu It Eat,IL!, :rV4/1'itiale-.;:::*:‘,4,:" '.° .411-"Pr, 1•:,9,,S11,7.„4 1 gfreAddigimu.1111ilite gliT ' ' t___„ :' !IL. .• I ..41d.1 41"*4,1,r;a11,hrt4i mm,g 11.vo0- •-•Plliil'-rt'11.‘/p0s.t"4in4Et I-`P..4,,1.4°".',,N1/14,4q l'a1 irI tlrc•''me'-'u0-4: WIF211 :"4 4 ;:.=4A:-1 tLi•i 4tMa..,4r7:,o.s.1.rb„„ie".-1-1.-:-1 rM4•e-,.,,i,f4is4Ih„.o.!la..0b.•=.-;,-;i.r.,i..t.:dd,1.p1..l.i,.J.4r.,.=z.: i.a,t=.l..w.,=.m".'o."m.=i.-'m"-,2,.t'-7-.nLi:n•l-om•i•=g.•::KV Wt-/ia.lidiA,t.-r•'"..',.• , °•%.,•;:r-1 1.: ''' ''Ia‘=" I I ' --'.s.r..._ __, I 4 '1 75' 1 •" .4.1,,, :a,- r.ii/Mk. ; ' 1,. I vir f• /4 y., /1;04W. ,ta.....11.-44alk. i likittAlliblrij iii • I . - *N.-•'..„_• ....otr,:titti: ti. :fr•-• ,.,,. •. . r, ,.W...,... ...iptwitismirsibow two- .___re... .,....4.......,...$ pl,.. . i a;.., •Am..- ..• e""!' s'"_-Agglibl40"--:--.;r4-11F •.1111‘ 4. eififts-114 -""E lb. P lir _ ,egiv Apturo rri..1-14.y.mmea:Lt..s:...... .,,,m4 gam -....01:.;r',...--,....-„,:..,,Proio......-• Att. ...L. .•.., w h, - ,...,,,, .awici.O.gamitc....ei.P .,;-,Etiil--.N, :1-,:.,1.-;aiiii...-:..parittl710°7„iikt•14;1100w•":109 -11,-14;0"All I gr-""4134-141111ir Vir trithatiN • T.::•2•.?..dr;r.,..wan.. ••,•• •-04......,.--•tar•-/..le.A.Igkeillre64004gaithiltit. All'",•44,41 - •" "`' I..- 'Iii t-.:;,,c.,;-.....-F-.7..--,-”. eN,I C-e12-46 e...•iti---; -,wpm,- --....-1 •ti.....411"•--1,.. -4401.111,_..--,f•A.. '111Mtlii 'wafne-""4,11.g.r, :azilliMittlit" -W.E1 -. ..-.--.2:-.---:=T::•:1, ' -----itiallam":1Ed°rmdigraw";' .,,lb•IP, .4.„,..71Nii.- , .,-0.tiol,4,,-. --..---..---E .:.;;;;;;•i'7..•• ,v..•-• ," __:...10, . 40 oraviVairaTeloaftsby I ' . I •119111111.* g '...‘';'' '..i.•.•,';'•.•e IP ".- •••/* 4 +••••••..f .'...Alava'LA V.Mr4 INbis .WhillNI,`‘ • 0\t IM / , 4' .kavP •• . •6....magure.....r. . 7 ... P.J...:7' A < t, .1 -, i jitt 0146.) -•,1 0 1E4, ift A ug.,..y t,.:.:=-•‘,....,p- ,4 .. w-ftt P I " • • rak is ....-. - 4 Eill911.- ...s, §r' - "r•i:A ftarit..i. -.1 ! 4....._ .„8,14411 , 1, .:'•1 its,:.:../. --- ..L.•1! $• Z i \SL. 4 ..,.. ...pytajai, ilip,,, -,r j • '- M' • ,•,‘) (1/.1\ i• . ',VA V. SF! ii 6 1 I YY / 11 1 • ,k 11 "IP..il g / . ....,....,r.:.,,,...... ..........77._ il „............ - . ..:4or :•)s. \ .. .. ... •••7:-..... - iv-- .......•...... ..•••••••.."'••••••.i,.00 ••••••••••....••• (2511•\ ............, \ i - • ' /ay \' •,1 .,u ..... I N."-- t ' -Arai .....„. . • i.... ' , 'I 14.... .4.... ....... . ......... : I. .. .\I • 11 i 1 1.." • 1 • !I • , • t . , • a w CC _ ; . Q i 1 Z nl r o`xr , •\ ram' I'11 1 f1 r.:3 Y' rr O 4 +I 1 I , I ~ t tom" •� C "' I !, y`< 7I/1 1 , 11 2 N 1 I Z i 11 .1� • k../- " I ' f ' :.111 Nd Z o n E I - ', f tl i' i i',11 � ' 1 } 3L. 0 i '-- ri =ii i: I '''. 4 1 V\ . _, / { • f \.t, till (11 • ./ I 1 , iLL ^ ; I \' r iY �l cA 'e 1\ II �� • I U\ S.'" ,..i i - 1) ( ,:I . A.N {{ 11 ,,I,.../1-11 I ' I I1 t, 1 A f J11 1 11 11, if l . .I ,II 11 J• iI 1 `s,• 1! 1, '! 1 ! g 1 !1 1 !Sl' 1 It j1 if I li z \ . I I . I f i I li I ( P. / 1 1� 1 1 tt 1( If f ;1 1 1 • it 1 1 1 S, h a / ?j 1 11 /� i b 'b ! , . 1. � �1 j 1 ' ,ar;l i w .1. r .... ' j1 I • �` q - Q y- rir.r , ,, - 111E:: " i' 111' 1 ,\,„.c; '''-S ., , tiv_if...„, o II -, of} ' . \ IIIPI, . ,,. �,�� 1, • . If ,„_ u ,.— . 1, T c , , 1 • .. / J. _ APIllh - 1, t 1 i ,,,r, ,w < a, 1 tp W i •' • - 2 1 - ' .\1.ti ItaL4 1 • i litri '1"-, • A-Fi:Ar,' -0--,\/' • .4 itilf*- i , 'N,11, bc �► v r Air to ►I+:1R' ,;ri 0 . 1 ; , Ng, 441,vo.,..,,... ., : if , pialaira,„.„, . di ��k ca (1,.. tiraig 511 ll I ; Q 1 i A; .i Tom' fr� � impw 11111W4ra •.' 111" ' illir ...4. •6 o I J�Arm .. J. --•41. . " CC ril jr"4111r.‘ei 'ff . g:0 -fiNvi ..‘. .1p- 4,-,, ,_ .r.-44. -rataNkvir lils, fi gin . i., dAr4. j sik.ii) 1y''r �tprl"},!� a;�t i Yl e,r�. !C i �1, is fir. ►�/ � d �s:'�"�'� .N.'•.n'.t'ff.:.�.[f7^±u�8.�.1't.•�',,;e••w• ,Y,.�'+ /1.0. I , 41/t �%. '.-21' �` ,�.,• y;MP � zmua.• ,..p ,:^ i1.411q�,'�, ..21, •a�i ,J i. ' • .• r.dial ir modi&ini.tiliilkAllp < 1° I --- ..... 7.:=........ >,/ '.r-.---1.--. ...--'\--\1fr.' \.N. . •-•i II irir ---- ........._._. iruos. .. . r •t. litak.„1111110 , - I . (> '• --- ' ,..))/ ) 1 ''' 1.,�t 'r':F�1rjy� .t'1' i!•'S' �i a•�� iPf.\��r .�.� tJl�I �1,�►•.-4i�}'j,,:. • r., �i�.,j�ti�.. &` J� l��ti�.- ir."ti�.Ga�1 i131ri•'•i3�11'...w•.io•� •� D' `"5'5w' a•� .L'.• 1` ,! t.. .4G�•iv u eA'lif,i / 4;. J- ,6,�aw•r r:. y 4' ''w y a1 i 11 5.6 �.,��_ f, J! i 1� 111: rLI 4:5-1 >....;, ar t bralel nur�tm�.:�'. ^A it r ��,tp.• C, .M,+p�,, T.er" �• <y.. • ���(y I� �- .-�:9.�...•.a�••��,...saw;.. .. kiln.• CC � ....:✓� lY' ?i •4�r` � 1��1�, 'i_.e.a`f J•-' Ir .�a• .. � ate• •�� i1dii. �.idYflrt .,i"ra"�. ,.-TIN r�=; ti.•-- r'�. a:•' .trl• ads". �. •fiai� t, '�• GJ A Ed R'� .63��'.1 y�..�" , ,V S c. �. �, .•••.!f;C%,�'y , • 11 {„�.. , . ° ►�� �� Grp-1.—" s r tr -4 Ini 10�"I;;as?4,, •4i1e,�'�i!ltv.. ,f; �fia.( A7•c• s,A• !''' ;- � 1 t a��.,�� _.0- ., ,, 'C ••�utNc��1. .�--4t,_`i l.� '' .. nr� ,► .e�= ,.� � .fie 1�+ tf• e '� '," N. �;4'; QIC••••41 �1 �i:'�� 1f "„,;74,'r.;tc�''p•� • 1. �`_49 ��tr!!/n` �11 tt� .��y' .irijair� }�,�.► iii/ � .. r....?Ls r wr •.o'.�_OOSS.,:I.P��� ��- � Tom._ r�� f �•r r e fq 65►2 rqs�:�'tt. ,� r'r�?7tp�•as�a+°�Tr`gs�t M�.• �y �f� �v :k `tJ Y/f••i y:11:?a17:2�c3V..iy 1; 1 l� il` � .�. J • .,! 9 nyI :�r,�BIL�.s s:.�.. i gy Ff.r, o • ,, .. �'OQ�;A� '' 1., .,..•a•' J' j i f.1.Z 1�.¢sae'' �'Il,,i, `h^gyp, �+ �I. I l <1i5 �.isY�lr,�.,:�v:al; 1 �i gf.�7llor,..�y�.� T. '0 7� • • it VIII. OTHER PERMITS IX. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN X. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS XI. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION MANUAL k q8 - IOO ,S14. January 29, 1998 Draft- For Review Only J sl g D LOP CITY OF RAN AN^%1NG JUN1i 1998 RECEIV la Traffic Traffic Impact Analysis OAKESDALE BUSINESS CAMPUS Prepared for Zelman Development Company Prepared by ENTRANCO 10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (425) 454-5600 January 1998 January 29, 1998 Draft- For Review Only SI I Traffic Impact Analysis OAKESDALE BUSINESS CAMPUS Prepared for Zelman Development Company Prepared by ENTRANCO 10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (425) 454-5600 January 1998 DRAFT CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 Road Network 1 Traffic Volumes 4 TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS 4 Trip Generation 4 Trip Distribution 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 7 Background Traffic Volume Growth 7 Level of Service Analysis 11 Queue Analysis 15 MITIGATION 17 APPENDIX A - Trip Distribution B- LOS Calculations C- Queue Analysis FIGURES Page 1. Project Vicinity 2 2. Site Plan 3 3. Existing Facilities 5 4. Existing Volumes Weekday P.M. Peak Hour 8 5. Project Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trip Distribution 9 6. 1999 Traffic Volumes Without Oakesdale Business Campus Trips 10 7. 1999 Traffic Volumes With Oakesdale Trips 13 8. 2010 Traffic Volumes Prior to and After the Opening of Oakesdale Avenue Extension 14 TABLES Page 1. Study Intersection Traffic Count Dates 4 2. Trip Generation Oakesdale Business Campus 6 3. P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Projections for Oakesdale Avenue 7 4. Level of Service 12 5. Queue Length Analysis 16 98002/Reports/tia(1/29/98)/pc DRAFT y INTRODUCTION This report documents the traffic impact analysis performed for the proposed Oakesdale Business Campus development to be located in Renton, Washington. This report addresses the existing traffic conditions in the immediate vicinity and provides an analysis and discussion of the traffic impacts created by and potential mitigations for the proposed development. The development is located in the northwest quadrant at the intersection of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue (figure 1). The property is bounded to the north by a vehicle storage/staging yard, to the east by Oakesdale Avenue, to the south by SW 43rd Street, and to the west by railroad right-of-way. Springbrook Creek splits the property into two triangular pieces. The portion north of Springbrook Creek encompasses 31.63 acres and is the only portion being developed at this time and is the only portion considered in this traffic analysis. The site is currently undeveloped, although there are some vacant structures located on the site. A site plan for the development is presented in figure 2. The development will consist of five structures, which will be primarily tilt-up warehouses/distribution facilities. The structure will range in size from about 53,000 square feet to about 149,000 square feet. The total footprint for the five structures will be 579,855 square feet. The structures will be surrounded by associated paved parking and driveway areas. There will be three access driveways, two onto Oakesdale Avenue, and one onto SW 43rd Street. Full buildout for the development is expected by 1999. EXISTING CONDITIONS Road Network The streets with direct access to the proposed Oakesdale Business Campus are SW 43rd Street, SW 41 st Street, and Oakesdale Avenue. Southwest 43rd Street is a four-to five-lane east-west principal arterial with two through lanes in each direction. The five-lane sections of SW 43rd Street include a two-way left-turn lane. Southwest 43rd Street provides a link across the Green River Valley, connecting the South Center area in Tukwila with Renton. Interchange access for northbound SR 167 is provided on SW 43rd Street. There are sidewalks on both sides of the road and the speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph). Oakesdale Avenue is a five-lane north-south minor arterial with two through lanes in each direction with localized left-turn lanes, raised landscaped medians, and sections of two-way left-turn lane. Currently, Oakesdale Avenue does not exist between SW 31 st Street and SW 16th Street. In 1998, Oakesdale Avenue will be extended from SW 16th Street to SW 27th Street, while by 2010 it is planned that the remaining portion of Oakesdale Avenue between SW 27th Street and SW 31st Street will be constructed. Once the Oakesdale Avenue extensions are completed, Oakesdale Avenue will provide a five-lane north-south route from central Renton to the south Renton area. Currently, there are sidewalks on the east side of the road only in the project vicinity, and the speed limit is 35 mph. 98002/Reports/tia(1/29/98)/)c :. /-_-__________ Oakesda/Pq�p SW ltfi St. alk • • A o /401pliKin3y " ay r c�� V ' `rI" _ SW 16th St � honster4 .4 1 , ,I ... _ , . .--. r=.. . 4 Vnot to sale b u S.lontraves Way H l ? I t 1 t • 1 .=';— V.F I. SW I76 St. i 4 f 'I e 1 1 GI" : iIf '�' 3' I = 1' • `\ ‘ } SW 34th St 1 ) 1 t r tTi Project • t 1` . Site a (161 i-• tIf ,' 1• v • 0 ! • .7) ::1 SW4IstSt. I // 1 SW 43rd St n / © ENTRANCO Figure 1 Project Vicinity [)130 9Buuz-D0 Trel[,c rseport 1i211:at1 AGT 0 Ii! b4Matfll e Vu 3 -1 PARCEL /`11. SCI.,MN_Si ?R:1 SCU-HAS- ':F:3 n, -CT.-L DAFCCLS Z fiC 'It •QUTIEA$T PARCEL Z `-- - -. I{I II S..8-PARCE_ - G 't \ 11 S'..B _AC_i. - H n '1 '�/� • -'Clliilll :� 11111 �11 11I�41 I .I' II • In 'IIle't011tlt•tll•:'IgIII 7 S'.e -P. 0 J 0 Na.lb N= = ,11 ! p;I. r sa.: I — • [ • 1 1� ) 1 G , S'B =A?C=l - K {�\ tS} - - + - - - -1•ar + - - -1—iir — -I [ - 1 f- - - �'f, i_:)• — i — — — •I ' SUODEICInrAS "v l� - i ;l B CiPL AREAS ,at = -+ -►1- -I- -I- - - - -I--1 - F -I �r - It - 1- - - - - -+ - - - - 1 - - moo • , \��44 _ - - + -►I -I- -I C I • r • �->, - - ► -I- 1 - -- i - t - I- :CV: t):1'\jCC[V 1, .3 ej;,`Z� • _' I-'� +'-k- - -- 1 '+ -1�_ I-t s-1 _ - - I -- 1'= ` t -..-!_-i Y -L - _ YORTN PARCEL.1111111 IN. _ t - I- - - t - 1- - - -i - '� t•I•-! - -+ - H-t- -I - -I- -1 i t - - ti0RT11 ►ATlCd (77:0; 17 I i •8 • 4, . NI r i�YF R BJLCItC C _ , B ILGI',C — C "Y' A y i Er -r.0 E ?$ , .•occ1l f IO 11' = - /�V J l ri- Ti-: ?ARCEL (:.'7P1 _ eA — ,; 1- _ r 1001 L —'• T .•xo- ^c�� /!1 I I u RTI: ?ARCEI 'ARK '•i�}`'� i - I- -I- -i I -I- - -t- -.1- - - - •=_ - - -1 -,I- ''I- -1 11 v,:� / .. uCRlr �ARCEI ?£rE 1t - - - - - - - — - - -• • - � 7 EXS-IrC OETL►ND B I -1 -I- I- -I- •+ `-• - ► I- i. x/../" .: ,l" 1<QJTVI El17 PARCEL r - - -1- -1;f - - _"c •- 1- -I- - .. ,.5�:<.i ;z:'; IA 1 - T - H.cl - - -F- -h, 1 - = ,-• F - - IIII II; �ETETTICN FC\C A71 - - •-•- n,: •3,- I ' - - `+ »e ► 'I• I / � -s ,4„ m STE9" S_CPC•'StiCRE i * I11 v --'W - r:I j!1>O ' fir- "c+v srsv�t S 10-A_ A?E% I : ,•2 O rsc';.' ..,. N�.:>I: S3.5.14wES- N.RCE' • - • 8111 „ _ - .r..:,. ,_ . alai ...�;�•qi. _i;.;.• s:; . a KEY NOTE) Y 1 t : 1•Z i'•�ar � ':. yt/.'1,: S?:...'i•�✓/"04.' ~yam ` •.,.......� ' Q u n-C[l..Dl y1 Al.AO. ILL.] R. + I—I—' �� .7 �. .5 ,!• '54•1'`5:1::"" — -.•-- 111 Wi1... i 1 2Y 11hS[tN 14.5•.'1.! ,1 I I IF _ — ici✓i .Y �„S,'• �i'• � .. I� 1 1 MCRiN]NFIk5or,1 OA • 4421: Cs rm.:wrt.osCS 1 1 — — �' i •' ��� •..1.}') n I I• 1 IS -LEAN) 11.P[r Its I. - I II )C. I 1�-" b. • 1 � ) t4 JN[RQ/ID,Per VA 4 ' 11,,,. ' ta•rulaA . :s Jw[T• Pf,c•ncc/rc•: 41 • I II I I . �t�7 110.11110 w•i•■a• ,)1 ; •D,MI 110W-rlti•11[ ~ • I I t' ■hM�••K I I iramu��IL SAN-Jrr SY161 J•Y\E w•1 O it.= , :u 7w t C.13 t .i.i ,''/ •a 111'••R t �Ta)wiI•WN/E.V7YC.I.: I [ . (1:,II kiln GI(I0C ■_ J' A _. ur.._._J__•-_`_'.- I -- fir. ..-—•-� '\ ,��.) G[V,„YA•N16TR. -s S.W. L3R? -sTR:r r- PRELIMINARY311 Oy " / n. ' N 0 T.' 110• fD OQ s m 7 tv DRAFT Southwest 41st Street is a four-lane east-west minor arterial with two through lanes in each direction. Southwest 41st Street provides a link between the southbound SR 167 interchange and the industrial/commercial areas in south Renton. Between Lind Avenue SW and Oakesdale Avenue, there are sidewalks on both sides of the street, and the speed limit is 25 mph. Existing facilities for these arterials, as well as other local streets in the Renton area, are illustrated in figure 3. Traffic Volumes The City of Renton requested a traffic analysis of all driveway access points to the proposed development and the intersection of Oakesdale Avenue/SW 43rd Street. Existing traffic volume data at these intersections were provided by the City of Renton Engineering Department. The p.m. peak hour turning movement counts were gathered in 1994 and 1997 for two of the four study intersections, as shown in table 1. The other two intersections are now driveways and therefore do not have existing turning movement counts. Table 1 Study Intersection Traffic Count Dates Intersection Count Date Oakesdale Avenue/Driveway North of 41st n/a Oakesdale Avenue/SW 41st Street 9/94 Oakesdale Avenue/SW 43rd Street 11/97 West Access Driveway/SW 43rd Street n/a Note: Numbers correspond to figure 4 showing the intersection traffic count data. TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) 1997 Trip Generation manual, Sixth Edition, was used to obtain trip generation rates and equations for various land uses. The development will consist of two different land uses: general light industrial (LUC 110) and warehousing (LUC 150). 98002/Reports/tia(1/29/98)/)c 4 / Oakesda/e Avp SW lth St. - ® w *onut,,e, . 35 litke •� i 11 t .t t 4 +, S.Longaaes wz W • I i. 40 t �- a / • tri, - ss _ Legend • 3 i Imo= 3-lane section • • " �� 4-lane section - '2 i SW 27th St . .2 i f 0. �■� Slane section c / / + i` ■ ■ ■ ■ 5-lane section ,. (proposed) mom 6-lane section 0111"/' i. 35 Sidewalk �' i i 35 • (per side) . tt" T Signalized 3 t intersection Ti J. I- n Speed Limit(mph) ;_ SW 34th St 401 ' I I 7 <i6>> t, 1,I ± 1 0 El 1 i 7 }i' SW 41 st St. SW43rdSt 1:1:1 )7:: • , . ,../.1r ct 9 -: -: -------„, • • © ENTRANCO FIgure3 Existing Facilities DRAFT The total trips generated by a project can sometimes be reduced by an internal capture rate, a pass-by trip factor, or both. Trips between land uses within one development are referred to as internal trips because they are trips that remain internal to the development and do not use the surrounding network of streets. The two land uses in the Oakesdale Business Campus do not promote each other, and are not expected to generate internal trips. Pass-by trips are defined as trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination without deviating from the normal route taken. The land uses associated with the Oakesdale Business Campus are not conducive to pass-by trips, therefore no pass-by trip reduction was made. Table 2 documents the estimated trip generation by land use for the proposed Oakesdale Business Campus. During the weekday p.m. peak hour, the Oakesdale Business Campus will generate 453 net new trips. On a weekday daily basis, the project is estimated to generate 3,575 net new trips. Table 2 Trip Generation Oakesdale Business Campus ITE Square Rate Trips Land Use LUC Footage In Out Total In Out Total Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Light Industrial 110 347,913 0.12 0.84 0.96 40 295 335 Warehouse 150 231,942 0.12 0.39 0.51 28 90 118 Total 579,855 68 385 453 Weekday Daily Total Light Industrial 110 347,913 3.48 3.49 6.97 1,212 1,213 2,425 Warehouse 150 231,942 2.48 2.48 4.96 575 575 1,150 Total 579,855 1,787 1,788 3,575 Note: Trip generation rates and/or equations were based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation manual, Sixth Edition, 1997. 98002/Reports/tia(V29/98)/)c 6 DRAFT Trip Distribution The trip distribution and assignment for the proposed development's trip generation was based on existing travel patterns (figure 4) and access to major arterials. Figure 5 depicts the p.m. peak hour trip assignment of the project-generated volumes on the surrounding street network. Trip distribution is provided in Appendix A. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Background Traffic Volume Growth The City of Renton recommended an annual growth rate of 2.5 to 3.0 percent in the study area when projecting future traffic volumes. Based on a history of average daily traffic volumes on Oakesdale Avenue between 1992 and 1997, it was calculated that this average annual growth rate on Oakesdale Avenue is actually 1.6 percent. For this reason, an annual growth rate of 2.5 percent was used, which is the lower recommended value by the City of Renton. Traffic volumes in 1999 are shown in figure 6. This analysis assumes that background traffic growth will remain constant until the Oakesdale Avenue extension between SW 27th Street and SW 31st Street is completed. The City of Renton projects that the extension will be completed by 2010. Table 3 compares the p.m. peak hour volume projections for Oakesdale Avenue before and after the opening of the extension. Volumes in the northbound direction are expected to triple by 2010, while southbound volumes are expected to more than quadruple. Table 3 P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Projections for Oakesdale Avenue Current 2010 before 2010 after Conditions Oakesdale Oakesdale Intersection (1998) Completion Completion NB Oakesdale between SW 43rd and 41st 178 280 540 SB Oakesdale between SW 43rd and 41 st 266 810 1,250 98002/Reports/sa(1/29/98)/jc 7 \ / J. ' Oakesda/e qfre SW 1th St. N. a' Ai+ 77..,,-.--. ''''''',/,,, -a dPr 4. � � J�'� ' I ® SW 16th St von:tetLi 9y ti j i , , .,-• 4- , \ o i not to sak S.Longacres 3 \\(...-...------ 1t 0 W 1 0 77 0 :( I Ill , I 0 117 0 Z-I i "I SW 21th St C �� ;$ (\Ill }jT I �k• 10 J�' 1 0 73 4 --.0 4�' i `.1 I 193 �r7 , + G1e 7 1 `� t r' 1 17/ i , _14- 0 t I _ f 3 Y it 1 \ it 161 ,- SW 34th St i �_ 47 I. 176 31 14 ' •41—999 Project 'J l L r 6 4 t)/ Site 1 77 `� t r' �/ lit Y 1312�► 240 59 80 (/ Tti i . c 202 Z f'l: eJ *t,;ttt SW 43rd St © SW41stSt • 0 i o! ° �—, • • a,siI r oo k t, \ ,I14 It )) 'o . } °� i m2: .17 1 NI Figure 4 © E N T R A N C O Existing Volumes Weekday P.M.Peak Hour . 1 ` y / Oakesd, Aye SW lth St t 1 l ,., + .,4. , - ' ' 1414.1(iiiiiiii,r ' , -•• • '.Nay X �saay • � ;IS10 �� Nlir �Yk.\ SW 16th St \innsfe,9 d ilk - .:.- + :c = Y not to sale R, 0 S.lon b gsaes W� 5 0 0 3 A _�-, 0-.. _ 0 22 0 e 49+i- t.' :T SW 21th St © �0 ;c 4' i' 0 24 25 *—11 Gee 22 J 1 r :1 58._.. 43 0 0 sa tg 3 - 4 (167) I t SW346St s 1 * i 0 28 84 .-4--.5 ' Project �- 1 �,. �c • Site a '� _ 0.-► 4 4 0 C. o� c1 Q SW4IstSt 0 is a 1sa o o .—o a. ` ' SW43rtiSt. / ..J 1 1. co 0) / 33 0 0-. J co2 . 7 tv Figure 5 © E N T R A N C O Project Net New P.M.Peak Hour Trip Distribution Oakesda/pqye SW ith Sc `t 1 , >t ' \ • -t a. a1 ‘44111.44(41 '.... "" .00 ip,7 Illir illiii hons ter 4, � , to lY • N u ROt to sale S longaaes W1 r 0 1 i 3 0 80 0 t l -, t r- 1i i ... 0 120 0 . .� SW 21th St. 6\1 _ . `9, + i? i 10 4-,'' ; !I 0 75 5 �—0 t1° „lei 1 r 198 = i I :-1 t (. j .. !I 0 110 72 { ' o •Tif 4110 SW 34th Sc Project �, 15 k.eoz4 Site Y 0 1345 246 61 82 _ 207 1 c7 m SW 4I st St. 0 to • ....:.':.: . :';' • f—1451 SW 43rd Sc o ir 01 0 2s—. - o•,), o, • cn Figure 6 © E N T R A N C O _ 1999 Traffic Volumes without Oakesdale Business Campus Trips DRAFT Level of Service Analysis SW 43rd Street/Oakesdale Avenue A level of service (LOS) analysis was performed at the intersection of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue for the p.m. peak hour. The LOS analysis was conducted using the principles of the Highway Capacity Manual, through a computer software package, Signal94. The concept of LOS is to rate intersections operationally based on the average stopped delay per vehicle traveling through the intersection. The LOS of an intersection is ranked from "A" (low delay) to "F" (delay exceeding 60 seconds per vehicle). Five scenarios were analyzed at the SW 43rd Street/Oakesdale Avenue intersection: • existing conditions • 1999 conditions • 1999 conditions with project traffic • 2010 conditions without the Oakesdale extension and with project traffic • 2010 conditions with the Oakesdale extension and project traffic As was mentioned previously, 1999 is the year that project buildout is expected, and 2010 is when the City expects the Oakesdale extension to be completed. The LOS calculations are provided in Appendix B. Results of the LOS analysis are provided in table 4. Traffic volumes for 1999 with project traffic are provided in figure 7. The intersection is currently operating at LOS D, with 27.2 seconds of delay. By 1999, the intersection will continue to be operating at LOS D, with or without the Oakesdale Business Campus traffic added to the network, however, there will be about a 6-second increase in average stopped delay. Traffic volumes for 2010 were provided by the City of Renton, and were based on a forecast transportation model. The 2010 forecast turning movements are shown in figure 8. By 2010, the intersection of SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue will be operating at LOS F. Unexpectedly, however, the intersection will operate with less delay after the Oakesdale connection is made, even though traffic on the north and south approaches increase substantially. One reason for this apparent anomaly is that the eastbound approach experiences a decrease of approximately 350 vehicles when the extension is completed, which is probably a result of vehicle redistribution. 98002/Reports/tia(1/29/98)/lc 1 1 Table 4 Level of Service Without Project Trips With Project Trips 2010 Without 2010 With 1998 1999 1999 Oakesdale Ext. Oakesdale Ext. Intersection LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Oakesdale Avenue/ D 27.2 0.8 D 30.2 0.81 D 36.5 0.83 F 81.9 1.20 F 80.2 1.18 SW 43rd Street Oakesdale Avenue/ B n/a n/a B n/a n/a C n/a n/a B 10.7 0.45 B 11.4 0.63 SW 41st Street Oakesdale Avenue/North No intersection No intersection A n/a n/a A n/a n/a B n/a n/a Driveway SW 43rd Street/ No intersection No intersection C n/a n/a B n/a n/a B n/a n/a West Driveway n/a=for unsignalized intersections,this data does not apply. . . . \ / ...., , . , Oakesdak, sw lth St. Awe. .. . , I ..• .'- - '*.....• ' 4.. ...% I. A . A n ' ' , , e 1* . . dPIrr SW 16th St tOnStet 4„ ! '' IW ... ..4 . . • . , .01114111111 • .. . ,. . , !••••••-• '.'". + • ,t. 7 • . not to Kole . . , . • ,,,.. 4. i . . , . . l . .. ‘ . , 5800 •: . . , 1 .7 1; .*.) 1 L*.• ' C/0 i • -- , -cr . • c = 0 i 1 e- _ 0 142 0 . :. ="•- 49 ...;‘ . • ; -.. '• , SW 21th St. Clil L , 0 99 30 .-4—11 , . •C• " . i •t n*i `.., r '98 I ,i 22 i 'Ill t (4' ••t• —10- • 43 110 72 •• , , . . . , L , + i T • 74 88 1 .... (161) , 1 , 0 , I , SW 34th St. k....54 181 60 99 .1.—1029 --J `. re . . . , • Project . . . . ..; 112 A .IP.N I (I' ' .... 1345--I.• 250 65 82 I .... • 207 .), .. 6 _ - a co :....-...:......:......-.................-...........-................-.........-.......... SW 41st St i 0 k...9 I ' - •. ...-..•••••:..:%.:-..:..........4 . , . . .. .•..•................•,....... 168 0 0 ..1—1451 7_ • • .• .•..•,......:„........... , o „i, 1 1/4,..... ir-0 SW 43 rd St. . •. .... •...... ,-, . - / to . o _ - --t - . , - 7 a. 2 . 7 o.1 :: " - Figure 7 41:310 ENTRANCO 1999 Traffic Volumes with Oakesdale'Trips / . - . Oakesda/ SW lth St e Ake. 1 1 •-. • , .- .- .1.siirsi . .- , 4 . s • ' ' ...‘so' • c NV , SW 16th St T ' ' , i )011 i ','• i 41111„. Ilk I 11 . i ... 1 1 • ' i ..., I 1= t 44 I 15:e inot to sale a S.,LegglatS T? 4-- 174. \I 0 T 1 (5)(1280)(0) i i i ii 5 740 0 . -:c -c, (0), it .-.., 1 r'" f •E' (o)o—..A. 0 90 0 T l (49)49 -,‘ (0)(420) (0) SW 21th St 491 ir:. lit (0)(11130)(100)r 10(40) 0 690 50 •TO—11(11) • Q.,.'• I if • ar-I 1 k.a... r 120(70) 7 .1, a (22)22 it '12.`11 t tir 58 14'. i 11 —4.:I 43 (88)88 1 --,-(43)(380)(160) a : IA 430 T i . 0 SW 34th St (60)(1150)(40)'I its 10(50) 110 690 10 )...—580(590) .. II AI 1 ,..., (180(240) •.. 1 Project ..; > Site -c T.7 a. (80)so '''‘ t r*" --. (950)960.-0480 190 50 :- i+ (370)710 1 (430)(410)(20) co SW 41st St 0 1 (168)(o) (0) "9(9) 168 0 0 -0-1170(1080) •..--. ,„1 1 „, (-on So . .... .. .. .. .. - 7 (0)0 - .5 .. 1400)1750-0. , ci _ - _ -- + T m . - en rn •:. ' 0 - Volumes prior to opening (0) - Volumes after opening Figure 8 (3110 ENTRANCO 2010 Traffic Volumes Prior to and After the Opening of Oakesdale Avenue Extension DRAFT Site Access There are three proposed driveways to the Oakesdale Business Campus. They include two unsignalized restricted movement driveways: one on SW 43rd Street at the western edge of the property, and one on Oakesdale Avenue near the northern edge of the property. Both of these driveways will be restricted to right in/right out only movement— no left turns will be permitted in or out of the site. The third driveway will be located directly across from the unsignalized intersection of SW 41st Street and Oakesdale Avenue. This driveway will be a full access driveway—all movements will be permitted. An unsignalized intersection LOS analysis was performed at the three driveway locations for the p.m. peak hour as well. Given the same five scenarios as were described previously, the LOS analysis was conducted and is documented in table 4 and Appendix B. Currently, the SW 41st Street/Oakesdale Avenue intersection is the only intersection that exists without the project's driveway, and operates at LOS B. By 1999, with project buildout, the SW 41st Street/Oakesdale Avenue intersection will still be operating at LOS B, and with project site traffic added to the network, will operate at LOS C. Based on this acceptable level of service, it is not expected that this intersection will require signalization. In 1999, the north driveway on Oakesdale Avenue will operate at LOS A, while the west driveway on SW 43rd Street will operate at LOS C. By 2010, operations at the SW 41st Street/Oakesdale Avenue intersection will deteriorate enough to constitute signalization. In addition, based on the peak hour signal warrant provided in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, it appears the intersection will meet signal warrants. Therefore, this intersection was assumed to be signalized for the LOS analysis in 2010. The itersection will operate at LOS B with or without the extension of Oakesdale Avenue, and with very little increase in delay. By 2010, the two other unsignalized driveways for the development will operate at either LOS A or B with or without the Oakesdale Avenue extension. Queue Analysis SW 43rd Street/Oakesdale Avenue Queues at the signalized intersection of Oakesdale Avenue and SW 43rd Street were calculated given 1999 and 2010 conditions, with and without project trips, and with and without the Oakesdale extension. Results of the queue analysis are provided in table 5, with calculations provided in Appendix C. Comparing queue lengths in 1999 with and without project traffic, queues increase for five out of the nine movements, and between 25 and 75 feet. There is 930 feet between the SW 43rd Street/Oakesdale intersection, and the nearest driveway on Oakesdale Avenue (SW 41st Street), therefore, no driveways or intersections are impeded by the estimated queues. 98002/Reports/tia(1/29/98)/lc 15 DRAFT Table 5 Queue Length Analysis Without Project Trips (ft) With Project Trips (ft) 2010 without 2010 with Oakesdale Oakesdale Intersection 1999 1999 Extension Extension SW 43rd St/Oakesdale Ave NB left 200 200 475 450 NB thru, thru/right 75 75 150 200 SB left 25 100 25 75 SB thru 50 75 425 500 SB thru/right 150 150 425 500 EB left 100 125 125 125 EB thru, thru/right 375 400 600 525 WB left 25 25 250 300 WB thru, thru/right 275 300 250 300 SW 41 st St/Oakesdale Ave NB left n/a 25 50 50 NB thru,thru/right freeflow freeflow 100 125 SB left 25 25 50 100 SB thru, thru/right freeflow freeflow 175 250 EB left n/a 25 25 25 EB thru,thru/right n/a 25 100 100 WB left 50 75 75 75 WB thru, thru/right 25 25 25 50 ` SW 43rd St/West Driveway SB right n/a 50 50 50 Oakesdale Ave/North Driveway n/a 25 25 25 EB right Notes: n/a=movement does not exist in this particular scenario. By 2010, queues increase significantly at this intersection, but the SW 41st Street intersection on Oakesdale Avenue is still not impeded by queue spillback from the SW 43rd Street intersection. Site Access A queuing analysis was also performed at the site's driveways. The results of the queue analysis are provided in table 5 and Appendix C. Comparing queue lengths in 1999 with 98002/Reports/pa(1/29/98)/jc 16 DRAFT and without project traffic at the SW 41st Street intersection on Oakesdale Avenue, queues increase at only one movement, and by only 25 feet. Given that this intersection will probably remain unsignalized in 1999 even with project traffic, the north and southbound movements on Oakesdale Avenue will be free flow, and therefore will not block driveways along Oakesdale Avenue. By 2010, queues increase slightly at the signalized SW 41st Street intersection on Oakesdale Avenue, which range between 25 and 250 feet. With the extension of Oakesdale Avenue, the north driveway on Oakesdale Avenue will likely be blocked occasionally by queues from the SW 41st Street intersection. In both 1999 and 2010, queues at the two restricted access driveways will range between 25 and 50 feet, and queues will only be on-site. MITIGATION The City of Renton has a traffic impact fee for new development, which is $75 per daily trip generated by the project. At 3,575 daily trips, the traffic impact fee for the Oakesdale Business Campus is $268,125. The impact fee is based on a developer's proportional share of the cost of identified transportation facilities needed to serve new growth and development. Any required mitigation for facilities that have not been identified by the City of Renton and used to calculate the $75/daily trip impact fee must be done in addition to the traffic impact fee. No additional mitigation has been identified at this time. 98002/Reports/8a(1/29/98)/jc 17 DRAFT • APPENDIX A Trip Distribution E N T R A N C O SHEET NO. OF //II� .� JOB NO. -'f L0 0 - 0a PROJECT Kraal(' R/9174/�� (G14k( l'i p Afr LU1ro CALCULATIONS FOR MADE BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE Sys vH �S 214J <11, F- If 5w ifis+sf. f3 e g ^l Iva Vf ict <— J I 33 5(0�3rd 5 33 - `��' S 7 Ytf ag I g 4. eIlxYI„A ?moil Top .1,i T(rps 0(4)- coMitlitY4 "Ivy : 119 .05? `t �g SR, ; '),3S ,o1-y 5 E - 1312 .433 zq I41✓ ,. 134(1 .y27G 30 16g✓ 164 G,g 3 8S t.4 5o1%0 rx(- •Li1 415f end g3(4 houtid revAf K,p 1ii 370 . III 5 � alb . 0(0.2 153) . 1- yo 33 �6� I Gg SHEET NO. OF • © ENTRANCO � �`[ // JOB NO. PROJECT 0a1 ,61u(P Oc/54,43 ((Ala Tfi� Y151dr�u(76`pi CALCULATIONS FOR MADE BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE r{3.6/0 325'0 10,0% L13.34 ?,y% I ' I►.�% DRAFT APPENDIX B LOS Calculations 1998 LOS CALCULATIONS WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR +HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKS41.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Oakesdale (E-W) 41st Street Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 oaks 41 1998 Conditions Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T. R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 107 71 4 73 193 10 PHF . 9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1.10 1. 10 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5. 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5. 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3 .40 . HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKS41.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 60 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1291 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1291 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 119 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1480 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1480 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1. 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 204 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 784 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1. 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1. 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 782 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 235 782 6. 6 1.4 , B 6. 4 WB R 12 1291 2.8 0.0 A SB L 4 1480 2 .4 0. 0 A 0. 1 Intersection Delay = 2 .9 sec/veh L_ksdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/26/98 thw oaks43 09:00:22 rrent (1998) PM Peak Hour SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 176 I 31 I 14 II I I WIDTHS I .0 124.0 12.0 II I v LANES 1 0 I 2 1 1 II I I II \ 47 .0 0 . / I \ /I\ -- 999 24.0 2 I 1 77 12.0 1 / + / 8 12.0 1 North I 1312 24.0 2 -- \ I / 202 .0 0 \ II I I I II 240 I 59 I 80 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 I II 12.0 124.0 I .0 ( PERMSV YNYN STTIME = 3.0 sec. I II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP YYYY II I I I LEADLAG LD LD aksdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/26/98 thw oaks43 09:00:16 current (1998) PM Peak Hour SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary ntersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .80 Vehicle Delay 27.2 Level of Service D+ a 16 Phase 1 ' Phase 2 ' Phase 3 ' Phase 4 ' + + + ^ + + + ++++ /'\ <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ ^ **** v ++++ Drth <* + +> ++++> ****> * + + v v G/C= .320 ' G/C= .068 ' G/C= .000 ' G/C= .479 I G= 28.8" G= 6.1" G= .0" G= 43.1" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" ' Y+R= .0" I Y+R= 4.0" ' OFF= .0% OFF=36.5% OFF=47.7% OFF=47.7% ' C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane 'Width/1 g/C Service Rate' Adj ' ' HCM ' L 190% Max' ' Group I Lanes' Reqd Used ' aC (vph) aE 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S ' Queue ' _3 Approach 16.5 C+ ' TH+RTI 24/2 ' .184 I .331 I 856 I 1036 I 241 I .233 I 16.6 I C+' 104 ftl LT ' 12/1 I .151 ' .331 I 275 ' 376 I 16 I .043 I 15.5 I C+' 25 ftl 3 Approach 29.9 D+ ' TH+RT' 24/2 ' .168 ' .331 ' 889 ' 1072 I 163 ' .152 ' 16.1 I C+' 71 ftl I LT ' 12/1 ' .381 ' .331 I 216 ' 302 I 267 ' .878 ' 38.3 '*D I 233 ftl WB Approach 14.4 B TH+RT' 24/2 ' .382 ' .490 I 1676 ' 1768 ' 1220 ' .690 ' 14.3 ' B ' 400 ftl LT I 12/1 I .147 ' .079 ' 1 I 119 ' 9 I .066 ' 29.2 I 0+1 25 ftl 3 Approach 36.6 D ' TH+RT' 24/2 ' .518 I .490 ' 1654 11746 ' 1766 11.011 ' 36.6 '*D I 578 ftl LT ' 12/1 I .169 I .079 ' 1 I 119 ' 86 ' .632 ' 36.8 '*D I 102 ftl 1999 LOS CALCULATIONS WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR , HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKS4IFC.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Oakesdale (E-W) 41st Street Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 oaks 41fc 1999 Conditions Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 < 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 110 72 5 75 198 10 PHF . 9 .9 .9 . 9 .9 . 9 ` Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 41. 10 1. 10 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6. 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKS41FC.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 61 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1290 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1290 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 99 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 122 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1474 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1474 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1.00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 211 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 776 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1. 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1. 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1. 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 772 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 242 772 6.8 1.5 B 6. 6 WB R 12 1290 2 .8 0.0 A SB L 7 1474 2.5 0. 0 A 0. 2 Intersection Delay = 2.9 sec/veh . F akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/26/98 thw oaks43FC 09:04:12 '999 PM Peak Hour w/o Oakesdale Trips SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Display of Intersection Parameters I I I II I Key: VOLUMES -- > I 181 I 32 I 15 II I I WIDTHS I .0 124.0 112.0 II I v LANES 0I 2I 1II I I I II \ 48 .0 0 . / I \ /I\ -- 1024 24.0 2 I I 79 12.0 1 / + / 8 12.0 1 North I 1345 24.0 2 -- \ I / 207 .0 0 \ II I I I II 246 I 61 I 82 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 I II 12.0 24.0 I .0 I PERMSV YNYN OSTTIME = 3.0 sec. I II 1 I 2 I 0 I OVERLP YYYY II I I I LEADLAG LD LD _jkesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/26/98 thw oaks43FC 09:04:06 '199 PM Peak Hour w/o Oakesdale Trips SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary aersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .81 Vehicle Delay 30.2 Level of Service D+ i 16 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I + + + ++++ -'I' <+ + +> <++++ I ^ ++++ I ^ **** y ++++ wth <* + +> ++++> ****> I * + + ++++ **** * + + v v G/C= .314 I G/C= .070 I G/C= .000 I G/C= .482 G= 28.3" G= 6.3" G= .0" G= 43.4" Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= .0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= .0% OFF=35.9% OFF=47.3% OFF=47.3% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Lane IWidth/I g/C Service Rate! Adj I I HCM I L I90% Max! I Group I Lanes! Reqd Used aC (vph) @E 'Volume! v/c I Delay I S I Queue I ac Approach 16.9 C+ TH+RTI 24/2 I .185 I .325 I 834 11018 I 249 I .245 I 16.9 I C+I 109 ftl LT 112/1 I .152 I .325 I 264 I 366 I 17 I .046 I 15.8 I C+I 25 ft1 Approach 36.1 D • I TH+RTI 24/2 I .169 I .325 I 866 11053 I 167 I .159 I 16.4 I C+I 74 ft' 1 LT 112/1 I .394 I .325 I 204 I 289 I 273 I .935 I 48.1 I*E+I 240 ftl WB Approach 14.4 B • TH+RTI 24/2 I .389 I .493 11690 11780 11251 I .703 I 14.3 I B 1407 ftl LT 112/1 I .147 I .081 I 1 I 124 I 9 I .064 I 29.0 I D+I 25 ftl Approach 41.1 E+ 1 TH+RTI 24/2 I .528 I .493 11668 11758 11810 I1.030 I 41.3 I*E+I 589 ftl LT 112/1 1 .170 1 .081 1 1 I 124 1 88 I .624 1 36.1 I*D 1104 ftl 1999 LOS CALCULATIONS with PROJECT TRIPS WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR . HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKS41PC.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Oakesdale (E-W) Driveway N of 41st Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 oaks 41pc with Project Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 142 80 5 49 PHF . 9 . 9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKS41PC.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 44 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1315 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1315 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 96 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 2 . 9 EB R 59 1315 2 .9 0. 0 A Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKS41PC.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Oakesdale (E-W) 41st Street Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 oaks 41pc 1999 w/ Project Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 1 1 < 0 1 1 < 0 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 43 110 72 30 99 0 22 58 88 198 11 10 PHF . 9 . 9 .9 . 9 .9 .9 .9 .9 . 9 . 9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1. 10 1. 10 1. 10 1. 10 1. 10 1. 10 1. 10 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKS41PC.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 61 55 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1290 1299 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1290 1299 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 99 0. 92 Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 122 110 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1474 1496 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1474 1496 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 98 0.96 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 313 313 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 716 716 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0. 94 0.94 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 674 674 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98 0.90 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 345 318 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 637 663 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.84 0. 92 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.88 0. 94 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.81 0.93 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 514 618 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) EB L 26 618 6. 1 0.0 B EB T 70 674 > 4 . 8 EB R 108 1299 > 952 4 . 6 0. 8 A WB L 242 514 13 . 1 2 . 6 C WB T 13 674 > 12 . 2 WB R 12 1290 > 874 4 .2 0. 0 A NB L 53 1496 2 . 5 0. 0 A 0. 5 SB L 36 1474 2 . 5 0. 0 A 0. 6 Intersection Delay = 5. 0 sec/veh _akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/27/98 thw oaks43FC 08:05: 18 ' 999 PM Peak Hour with Oakesdale Trips SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 181 60 99 I WIDTHS I . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 v LANES 0 2 1 \ 54 . 0 0 •/ I \ / \-- 1029 24 . 0 2 112 12 . 0 1 / + / 8 12 . 0 1 North 1 1345 24 . 0 2 -- \ 1 / 207 . 0 0 \ 250 65 82 Phasing: SEQUENCE 16 12 . 0 24 . 0 .0 PERMSV YNYN )STTIME = 3 . 0 sec. 1 2 0 OVERLP YYYY LEADLAG LD LD )akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/27/98 Ahw oaks43FC 08:05: 12 1999 PM Peak Hour with Oakesdale Trips JIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) .83 Vehicle Delay 37 . 5 Level of Service D ;q 16 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 ' Phase 3 I Phase 4 */** + + + A + + + ++++ / � \ <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ A **** v ++++ Morth <* + +> ++++> ****> I * + + ++++ **** * + + v v G/C= . 330 G/C= . 072 G/C= . 000 G/C= .465 G= 29.7" G= 6. 5" G= . 0" G= 41. 8" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= . 0" Y+R= 4. 0" OFF= .0% OFF=37 .5% OFF=49. 1% OFF=49. 1% C= 90 sec G= 78. 0 sec = 86.7% Y=12 . 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group ' Lanes' Reqd Used @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay S 190%Queue ' :B Approach 16.4 C+ THLT+RTI 12/1 24/2 ' . 207 191 ' . 341. 341 ' 283 911 ' 1381 86 ' 281 110 ' .289 259 ' 16. 6 16. 3 ' C+' 120 ft 94 ft NB Approach 41.2 E+ LT+RTI 12/1 24/2 ' .. 170 422 ' . 341. 341 ' 203 931 ' 1282 107 ' 278 171 ' .975 154 ' 56.9 15.7 I *E+' 239 ft73 i .IB Approach 15.7 c+ THLT+RTI 12/1 24/2 I . 147 392 ' .. 476 083 11611 6 ' 1126 11269 3 ' . 063 736 ( 28. 9 15. 6 I D+' 425 ft25 I ;B Approach 55. 1 E I LT 12/1 12/1 1 . 183 1 .. 476 083 I1591 11126 11124 ' 1. 867 1 57 . 8 ' *E 1 146 ft' .HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d 43RDWDPC.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) West Driveway (E-W) 43rd Street Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 43rd wdpc 1999 with Project Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 1664 1451 9 168 PHF .9 . 9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 + HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d 43RDWDPC.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 806 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 541 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 541 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 62 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 10. 7 SB R 206 541 10.7 1.9 C Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh 2010 LOS CALCULATIONS prior to OAKESDALE EXTENSION COMPLETION WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR r HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKN4IFF.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Oakesdale (E-W) Driveway N of 41st Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information 200 Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 oaks 41ff w/o Oakesdale Ext. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 90 740 5 49 PHF . 9 .9 .9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) 1. 10 PCE's Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5. 50 2. 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5. 50 2 .60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3 .40 'HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKN41FF.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 411 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 857 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 857 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 93 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 4 .5 EB R 59 857 4 . 5 0. 1 A Intersection Delay = 0. 3 sec/veh 4 )akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/28/98 thw oaks41FF (Oakesdale Avenue/SW 41st Street) 09 :40:27 1010 PM Peak Hour prior to Extension Opening SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 0 690 50 I WIDTHS . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 v LANES 0 2 1 \ 10 . 0 0 •/ I \ / \-- 11 12. 0 1 22 12 . 0 1 / + / 120 12 . 0 1 North 1 58 12 . 0 1 -- \ 1 / 88 . 0 0 \ 43 80 200 Phasing: SEQUENCE 41 12 . 0 24 . 0 . 0 PERMSV NNNN ,OSTTIME = 3 . 0 sec. 1 2 0 OVERLP YYYY LEADLAG LD LD 4 „akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/28/98 thw oaks41FF (Oakesdale Avenue/SW 41st Street) 09:43 : 18 -010 PM Peak Hour prior to Extension Opening SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1. 4] - Capacity Analysis Summary ntersection Averages for Int # 0 - Oakesdale Ave. /SW 41st St. Degree of Saturation (v/c) .45 Vehicle Delay 10.7 Level of Service B q 41 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 **/** A * * **** / ' \ *> <**** V A ++++ A ++++ v orth <+ + +> ++++> 1 + + + ++++ + + + v G/C= . 149 G/C= . 326 G/C= .326 G= 8 . 9" G= 19 . 5" G= 19.5" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4. 0" OFF= .0% OFF=21.5% OFF=60.8% C= 60 sec G= 48 . 0 sec = 80. 0% Y=12 . 0 sec = 20. 0% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group ' Lanes' Reqd Used @C (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c Delay S 190% Queue aB Approach 11. 6 B TH LT ' 24 12/1 ' . 053 235 ' . 165. 342 ( 1232 227 ( 1292 275 ' 856 05 ' . 192. 631 ' 11 14.0.4 ' *B*B ' 239 ft' B Approach 9.9 B+ LTTH+RT' 12/1 24/2 ( .. 121 047 ' . 165. 342 ' 1232 089 ' 1292 139 ' 348 27 ' . 164 13 . 9 B287 9. 3 +' 91 34 ft' WB Approach 9. 6 B+ LT 12/1 12/1 ' .1168 27 I . 342 342 I 319 538 I 368 592 ' 133 23 I . 3361 39 I 9. 8 8.5 l *B+B+1 74 ft25 ' B Approach 9. 2 B+ LT+RTI 12/1 1 . 000 1 . 342 1 508 1 5611 1 124 1 . 043 8. 5 1 B+' 25 ft )akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/27/98 thw oaks43ff 14 : 05: 53 1O10 PM Peak Hour (Prior to Opening of Oakesdale Avenue Ext. ) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1. 4 ] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 110 690 10 I WIDTHS . 0 24 . 0 12 .0 v LANES 0 2 1 \ i0 . 0 0 / I \ / \-- 580 24. 0 2 80 12 . 0 1 / + / 180 12 . 0 1 North 960 24 . 0 2 -- \ I / 710 .0 0 \ 480 190 50 Phasing: SEQUENCE 65 12 . 0 24 . 0 . 0 PERMSV NNNN JOSTTIME = 3 . 0 sec. 1 2 0 OVERLP YYYY LEADLAG LD LD akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/27/98 hw oaks43ff 14 : 05:46 2010 PM Peak Hour (Prior to Opening of Oakesdale Avenue Ext. ) IGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1. 4) - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 1.20 Vehicle Delay 81. 9@ Level of Service F @ expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE) -q 65 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 */** * * * A A * * * ++++ ++++ / \ *> - <* * <++++ <++++ v A ++++ **** A **** v v North <+ <* + +> + +> ****> 1 + * + + + + **** + * + + + + v G/C= . 032 G/C= . 154 G/C= . 177 G/C= . 032 G/C= . 014 G/C= . 390 G= 3 .9" G= 18. 5" G= 21.2" G= 3 .9" G= 1.7" G= 46.8" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= . 0% OFF= 6. 6% OFF=25.3% OFF=46. 3% OFF=52.9% OFF=57.6% C=120 sec G= 96. 0 sec = 80.0% Y=24 . 0 sec = 20. 0% Ped= . 0 sec = .0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max Group I Lanes' Reqd Used (IC (vph) @E 'Volume' v/c I Delay I S 190% Queue B Approach 102.7@ F I LT 12/1 .262 . 041 1 ( 649 38 I 911 33 I1. 159.435 1142 . 3@I *E+*F ) 625 ft56 l I . 185 1 NB Approach 79 . 3@ F LTTH+RT' 24/2 12/1 ' . 425 291 I .228 373 I 8641 11367 I 533 280 ' 1.388.219 ( 110. 6@ 19. 6 I *F+I 716 ft 153 ' B Approach 45. 5@ E+ LT+RT' 12/1 24/2 ' . 307. 339 ' . 088.446 11341 6 ' 1125 ' 200 688 ' 1. 316.425 ' 142 . 1@ 17 . 4 ' *F+' 312 ft326 ' TB Approach 89 . 3@ F 1 LT+RTI 12/1 1 . 279 I . 041 11001 11349 11989 I1. 271 1 177 . 7@I *F ' 10146 ftI HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d 43RDWDPC.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) West Driveway (E-W) 43rd Street Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 43rd wdff 2010 w/o Oakes. Ext. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 1750 1170 9 168 PHF . 9 . 9 .9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7. 00 3 .40 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d 43RDWDPC.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 650 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 649 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 649 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 68 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 8 . 1 SB R 206 649 8 . 1 1. 5 B Intersection Delay = 0.4 sec/veh 2010 LOS CALCULATIONS after OAKESDALE EXTENSION COMPLETION WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR •HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2. 1d OAKN41AF.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Oakesdale (E-W) Driveway N of 41st Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 oaks 41af w/ Oakesdale Ext. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 420 1280 5 49 PHF .9 .9 .9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3 .40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d OAKN41AF.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 711 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 604 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 604 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 90 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 6. 6 EB R 59 604 6. 6 0. 3 B l Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh ..akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/28/98 thw oaks41fC (Oakesdale Avenue/SW 41st Street) 09: 42: 05 -010 PM Peak Hour with Extension Open SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 0 1180 100 I WIDTHS . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 v LANES 0 2 1 \ 40 . 0 0 . / 1 \ / \ -- 11 12 . 0 1 22 12 . 0 1 / + / 70 12 . 0 1 North 58 12 . 0 1 -- \ 1 / 88 . 0 0 \ 43 380 160 Phasing: SEQUENCE 41 12 . 0 24. 0 .0 PERMSV NNNN OSTTIME = 3 . 0 sec. 1 2 0 OVERLP YYYY LEADLAG LD LD Jakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/28/98 thw oaks41fC (Oakesdale Avenue/SW 41st Street) 09 : 42 : 00 ^010 PM Peak Hour with Extension Open SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - Oakesdale Ave. /SW 41st St. Degree of Saturation (v/c) . 63 Vehicle Delay 11.4 Level of Service B ;q 41 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** A * * **** / ' � *> <**** ++++ ++++ v forth <+ + +> ++++> I + + + ++++ + + + v G/C= . 118 G/C= .421 G/C= .261 G= 7. 1" G= 25. 3" G= 15.7" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= 4. 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=18.4% OFF=67.2% C= 60 sec G= 48 . 0 sec = 80.0% Y=12 . 0 sec = 20. 0% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Max I Group I Lanes ' Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E !Volume! v/c Delay S 190% Queue ' 613 Approach 13 . 1 B TH *B LT ! 24/2 12/1 ! . 380. 091 ' .438. 134 I 1606 181 ! 1630 237 ! 1377 111 ! .845.466 ' 12. 8 16. 6 ' *C+! 327 81 ft! fB Approach 8. 1 B+ I LTTH 12/1 24/2 12/1 ' . 04. 198 ! ..438 134 11181 532 11237 558 ( 648 30 I . 202.404 ! 15. 0 7.5 ! B+' 135 ft! WB Approach 10. 8 B THLT 12/1 12/1 12/1 ! . 057. 086 I . 278. 278 I 399 239 I 457 289 I 56 78 ' . 123. 270 I 11. 5 1. 0 ! *B B ' 34 47 ft ;B Approach 11.2 B THLT+RTI 12/1 1 .. 128 000 1 . 278 1 355 1 411 I 124 1 . 058 1 10. 3 1 B 1 25 ft • 4 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2. 1d 43RDWDFF.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) West Driveway (E-W) 43rd Street Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 43rd wdaf 2010 w/ Oakes. Ext. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --=-No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 1400 1080 9 168 PHF . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5. 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3 .40 akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/27/98 thw oaks43af 14: 09 : 17 'O10 PM Peak Hour (After Opening of Oakesdale Avenue Ext. ) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1. 4) - Display of Intersection Parameters Key: VOLUMES -- > 60 1150 40 1 WIDTHS . 0 24 . 0 12 . 0 v LANES 0 2 1 \ 50 . 0 0 / I \ -- 590 24 . 0 2 / \ 80 12 . 0 1 / + / 240 12 . 0 1 North 950 24 .0 2 -- \ 1 / 370 .0 0 \ 430 410 20 Phasing: SEQUENCE 65 12 . 0 24 . 0 . 0 PERMSV NNNN OSTTIME = 3 .0 sec. 1 2 0 OVERLP YYYY LEADLAG LD LD )akesdale Business Campus 98002-60 01/27/98 thw oaks43af 14 : 09 : 13 2010 PM Peak Hour (After Opening of Oakesdale Avenue Ext. ) SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Entersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 1. 18 Vehicle Delay 80.2@ Level of Service F @ expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE) 3q 65 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 .r*/** * * * .. .. * * * ++++ ++++ / \ *> <* * <++++ <++++ v A ++++ **** A A **** V V forth <+ <* + +> + +> ****> 1 + * + + + + **** + * + + + + v G/C= . 032 G/C= . 131 G/C= . 266 G/C= . 032 G/C= . 041 G/C= . 298 G= 3 .8" G= 15.7" G= 32 .0" G= 3 . 8" G= 4 .9" G= 35.7" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= 4. 0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4 .0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF= 6.5% OFF=22 .9% OFF=52 . 9% OFF=59. 5% OFF=66.9% C=120 sec G= 96. 0 sec = 80.0% Y=24 . 0 sec = 20. 0% Ped= . 0 sec = .0% Lane (Width/ I g/C I Service Rate' Adj I I HCM ' L I90% Max1 Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue ;B Approach 92 .9@ F LT+RTI 12/1 24/2 l ..464 269 l .. 275 040 l 141 i 949 78 11444 12 11. 638.444 i 54 .8@l *E*F I 873 ft84 I 1B Approach 64 .2@ F ILT+RTI 12/1 ( .403 l .204 11261 l 1324 l 4708 11.390 l 114 .1@l *F+l 662 ftl WB Approach 51.4@ E THLT+RTI 242 12/1 l . 349. 326 I . 380. 115 l 957 1 l 1366 171 l 748 267 1 . 548 1. 348 I 22 . 5 132 . 4@l *F l 397 405 ftl :B Approach 96. 5@ F LT+RTI 12/1 1 .. 498 279 1 .. 306 040 1 4101 I 1066 I 1589 11. 271 1 177 .7@l *F 1 146 ftl ' -'HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d 43RDWDFF.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) West Driveway (E-W) 43rd Street Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst thw Date of Analysis 1/26/98 Other Information Oakesdale Business Campus 98002-60 43rd wdaf 2010 w/ Oakes. Ext. Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --=- ---- No. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield Y Y Volumes 1400 1080 9 168 PHF .9 .9 . 9 .9 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 1. 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5. 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5. 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3 .40 • L HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d 43RDWDFF.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 600 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 688 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 688 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0. 70 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 7 . 5 SB R 206 688 7 .5 1.4 B 1 Intersection Delay = 0.5 sec/veh • ' DRAFT APPENDIX C Queue Analysis 430 ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: Oakesdale Business Campus PROJECT NUMBER: 98002-60 PEAK HOUR: PM Peak ANALYSIS YEAR: 1999 Forecast,without Project Trips NORTH/SOUTH STREET: Oakesdale Avenue EAST/WEST STREET: 43rd Street SE CYCLE LENGTH: 90 PEAK HOUR AVERAGE 95% QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME VEH/CYCLE CONFIDENCE LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) IN QUEUE (Vehicles) (feet) NB LEFT 246 61.7 4.2 8 200 NB LT-THRU 0 90.0 0.0 0 NB THROUGH 72 61.7 1.2 3 75 NB RT-THRU 71 61.7 1.2 3 75 NB RIGHT 0 90.0 0.0 0 SB LEFT 15 61.7 0.3 1 25 SB LT-THRU 0 90.0 0.0 0 SB THROUGH 32 61.7 0.5 2 50 SB RT-THRU 181 61.7 3.1 6 150 SB RIGHT 0 90.0 0.0 0 EB LEFT 79 83.7 1.8 4 100 EB LT-THRU 0 90.0 0.0 0 EB THROUGH 776 46.6 10.0 15 375 EB RT-THRU 776 46.6 10.0 15 375 EB RIGHT 0 90.0 0.0 0 WB LEFT 8 83.7 0.2 1 25 WB LT-THRU 0 90.0 0.0 0 WB THROUGH 536 46.6 6.9 11 275 WB RT-THRU 536 46.6 6.9 11 275 WB RIGHT 0 90.0 0.0 0 Note: All queues based on'red time'formula assuming poisson distribution 1/28/98 QUEUANA2.XLS 430 ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: Oakesdale Business Campus PROJECT NUMBER: 98002-60 PEAK HOUR: PM Peak ANALYSIS YEAR: 1999 Forecast, with Project Trips NORTH/SOUTH STREET: Oakesdale Avenue EAST/WEST STREET: 43rd Street SE CYCLE LENGTH: 90 PEAK HOUR AVERAGE 95% QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME VEH/CYCLE CONFIDENCE LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) IN QUEUE (Vehicles) (feet) NB LEFT 250 60.3 4.2 8 200 NB LT-THRU 0 90.0 0.0 0 NB THROUGH 74 60.3 1.2 3 75 NB RT-THRU 73 60.3 1.2 3 75 NB RIGHT 0 90.0 0.0 0 SB LEFT 99 60.3 1.7 4 100 SB LT-THRU 0 90.0 0.0 0 SB THROUGH 60 60.3 1.0 3 75 SB RT-THRU 181 60.3 3.0 6 150 SB RIGHT 0 90.0 0.0 0 EB LEFT 112 83.5 2.6 5 125 EB LT-THRU 0 90.0 0.0 0 EB THROUGH 776 48.2 10.4 16 400 EB RT-THRU 776 48.2 10.4 16 400 EB RIGHT 0 90.0 0.0 0 WB LEFT 8 83.5 0.2 1 25 WB LT-THRU 0 90.0 0.0 0 WB THROUGH 542 48.2 7.2 12 300 WB RT-THRU 541 48.2 7.2 12 300 WB RIGHT 0 90.0 0.0 0 Note: All queues based on"red time"formula assuming poisson distribution 1/28/98 QUEUANAL.XLS 430 ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: Oakesdale Business Campus PROJECT NUMBER: 98002-60 PEAK HOUR: PM Peak ANALYSIS YEAR: 2010 Forecast, prior to Oakesdale Extension Opening NORTH/SOUTH STREET: Oakesdale Avenue EAST/WEST STREET: 41st Street SE CYCLE LENGTH: 60 PEAK HOUR AVERAGE 95% QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME VEH/CYCLE CONFIDENCE LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) IN QUEUE (Vehicles) (feet) NB LEFT 43 51.1 0.6 2 50 NB LT-THRU 0 60.0 0.0 0 NB THROUGH 140 40.4 1.6 4 100 NB RT-THRU 140 40.4 1.6 4 100 NB RIGHT 0 60.0 0.0 0 SB LEFT 50 51.1 0.7 s 2 50 SB LT-THRU 0 60.0 0.0 0 SB THROUGH 345 40.4 3.9 7 175 SB RT-THRU 345 40.4 3.9 7 175 SB RIGHT 0 60.0 0.0 0 EB LEFT 22 40.4 0.2 1 25 EB LT-THRU 0 60.0 0.0 0 EB THROUGH 0 40.4 0.0 0 EB RT-THRU 146 40.4 1.6 4 100 EB RIGHT 0 60.0 0.0 0 WB LEFT 120 40.4 1.3 3 75 WB LT-THRU 0 60.0 0.0 0 WB THROUGH 0 60.0 0.0 0 WB RT-THRU 21 40.4 0.2 1 25 WB RIGHT 0 60.0 0.0 0 Note: All queues based on'red time'formula assuming poisson distribution 1/28/98 QU410K10.XLS 4 L 430 ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: Oakesdale Business Campus PROJECT NUMBER: 98002-60 PEAK HOUR: PM Peak ANALYSIS YEAR: 2010 Forecast, prior to Oakesdale Extension Opening NORTH/SOUTH STREET: Oakesdale Avenue EAST/WEST STREET: 43rd Street SE • CYCLE LENGTH: 120 PEAK HOUR AVERAGE 95% QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME VEH/CYCLE CONFIDENCE LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) IN QUEUE (Vehicles) (feet) NB LEFT 480 97.7 13.0 19 475 NB LT-THRU 0 120.0 0.0 0 NB THROUGH 120 80.3 2.7 6 150 NB RT-THRU 120 80.3 2.7 6 150 NB RIGHT 0 120.0 0.0 0 SB LEFT 10 116.2 0.3 1 25 SB LT-THRU 0 120.0 0.0 0 SB THROUGH 400 98.8 11.0 17 425 SB RT-THRU 400 98.8 11.0 17 425 SB RIGHT 0 120.0 0.0 0 EB LEFT 80 116.2 2.6 5 125 EB LT-THRU 0 120.0 0.0 0 1 EB THROUGH 835 73.2 17.0 24 600 EB RT-THRU 835 73.2 17.0 24 600 EB RIGHT 0 120.0 0.0 0 WB LEFT 180 114.5 5.7 10 250 WB LT-THRU 0 120.0 0.0 0 WB THROUGH 295 71.5 5.9 10 250 WB RT-THRU 295 71.5 5.9 10 250 WB RIGHT 0 120.0 0.0 0 Note: All queues based on'red time'formula assuming poisson distribution 1/28/98 QU430K10.XLS 430 ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: Oakesdale Business Campus PROJECT NUMBER: 98002-60 PEAK HOUR: PM Peak ANALYSIS YEAR: 2010 Forecast, after Oakesdale Extension Opening NORTH/SOUTH STREET: Oakesdale Avenue EAST/WEST STREET: 41st Street SE CYCLE LENGTH: 60 PEAK HOUR AVERAGE 95% QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME VEH/CYCLE CONFIDENCE LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) IN QUEUE (Vehicles) (feet) NB LEFT 43 52.9 0.6 2 50 NB LT-THRU 0 60.0 0.0 0 NB THROUGH 270 34.7 2.6 5 125 NB RT-THRU 270 34.7 2.6 5 125 NB RIGHT 0 60.0 0.0 0 SB LEFT 100 52.9 1.5 ' 4 100 SB LT-THRU 0 60.0 0.0 0 SB THROUGH 590 34.7 5.7 10 250 SB RT-THRU 590 34.7 5.7 10 250 SB RIGHT 0 60.0 0.0 0 EB LEFT 22 44.3 0.3 1 25 EB LT-THRU 0 60.0 0.0 0 EB THROUGH 0 60.0 0.0 0 EB RT-THRU 146 44.3 ' 1.8 4 100 EB RIGHT 0 60.0 0.0 0 WB LEFT 70 44.3 0.9 3 75 WB LT-THRU 0 60.0 0.0 0 WB THROUGH 0 60.0 0.0 0 WB RT-THRU 51 44.3 0.6 2 50 WB RIGHT 0 60.0 0.0 0 Note: All queues based on'red time'formula assuming poisson distribution 1/28/98 QU410K10.XLS 430 ENTRANCO DATA INPUT FORM FOR DETERMINING QUEUE LENGTH PROJECT: Oakesdale Business Campus PROJECT NUMBER: 98002-60 PEAK HOUR: PM Peak ANALYSIS YEAR: 2010 Forecast, after Oakesdale Extension Opening NORTH/SOUTH STREET: Oakesdale Avenue EAST/WEST STREET: 43rd Street SE CYCLE LENGTH: 120 PEAK HOUR AVERAGE 95% QUEUE VOLUME RED TIME VEH/CYCLE CONFIDENCE LENGTH MOVEMENT (Vehicles) (Seconds) IN QUEUE (Vehicles) (feet) NB LEFT 430 100.4 12.0 18 450 NB LT-THRU 0 120.0 0.0 0 NB THROUGH 215 72.4 4.3 8 200 NB RT-THRU 215 72.4 4.3 8 200 NB RIGHT 0 120.0 0.0 0 SB LEFT 40 116.2 1.3 3 75 SB LT-THRU 0 120.0 0.0 0 SB THROUGH 605 88.1 14.8 20 500 SB RT-THRU 605 88.1 14.8 20 500 SB RIGHT 0 120.0 0.0 0 EB LEFT 80 116.2 2.6 5 125 EB LT-THRU 0 120.0 0.0 0 EB THROUGH 660 84.2 15.4 21 525 EB RT-THRU ' 660 84.2 15.4 21 525 EB RIGHT 0 120.0 0.0 0 WB LEFT 240 111.2 7.4 12 300 WB LT-THRU 0 120.0 0.0 0 WB THROUGH 320 79.3 7.1 12 300 WB RT-THRU 320 79.3 7.1 12 300 WB RIGHT 0 120.0 0.0 0 Note: All queues based on'red time'formula assuming poisson distribution 1/28/98 QU430K10.XLS • CIS.. too 1, 13501 100th Are.N.E.,Ste.52itt 4rs; Northern , Inc• Kirkland.WA 98034 (425)825-0327 Fax(425)8225-0328 • Consulting Engineers • Environmental Scientists • Construction Materials Testing 722 4o. 16th Me..Ste.31 Yakima.WA 98902 (509)2i8.9'98 Fax(509)248-4220 6713 W.Clearwater.Ste.F Kennewick.WA 99336 (509)734-9320 Fax(509)73+932I June 15, 1998 81006 Hermiston.r OR 9'838 Project No. 298-801 (541)56+0991 Fax(541)56+0928 RHL Design Group Inc. 1550 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005-4516 Attention: John W. Strobel C OpM Fly, Reference: Preliminary Geotechnical Study �OF'QFiy�1N*� Southland Fueling Station and C-Store `SUN j ON NG SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW Site 1998 Renton, Washington 1/ IN Dear John: At your request, we have conducted surface and subsurface investigations at the above site. This letter transmits the results, conclusions, and recommendations for the project contained in the accompanying geotechnical engineering report. Based on the results of our study, and previous geotechnical studies conducted at the site and adjacent property by Earth Consultants, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided that the recommendations presented in this report are implemented in the proposed design. We are pleased to be able to provide geotechnical services for the proposed project. If you have additional questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, GN NORTHERN, IN . • R ad I. Khan Manager Western Division CORPORATE OFFICE: E-mail: gnnorthern@ewa.net • 1.800.428-9798 • Web Site: http://www.gnnorthern.com PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY Southland Fueling Station& C-Store SW 43`d Street& Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, Washington Report Presented to: RHL Design Group Inc. 1550 140t Avenue NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005-4516 Submitted by: GN Northern, Inc. 13501 100t Avenue NE, Suite#5238 Kirkland, WA 98034 Project No. 298-801 June 15, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 4.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2 4.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS 2 4.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 4.2.1 Methodology 2 4.2.2 Soil Conditions 3 4.2.3 Groundwater 3 4.3 PUBLISHED GEOLOGY 4 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 4 6.0 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS 5 6.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN 5 6.2 SLAB-ON-GRADE FLOORS 6 6.3 UST EXCAVATION 6 6.4 PAVEMENT DESIGN 7 6.5 SITE AND BUILDING DRAINAGE 8 6.6 EROSION CONTROL 9 6.7 SITE PREPARATION 9 6.8 STRUCTURAL FILL 9 7.0 CONSTRUCTION MONITORING 10 8.0 GENERAL 11 APPENDICES: Appendix A: Vicinity Map & Site Plan Showing Test Pit Locations Appendix B: Boring Logs & USCS Classification Chart <qv Northern, Inc. 1.0 INTRODUCTION RHL Design Group Inc., requested GN Northern, Inc., to conduct a geotechnical study for the proposed Southland Fueling Station and C-Store project site, located at the northwest corner of the intersection between SW 43`1 Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW, in Renton, Washington. This report summarizes the findings of our field investigation, presents geotechnical conclusions, and provides preliminary recommendations for the proposed project. Mr. John Strobel of RHL Design Group Inc. granted authorization to proceed with this study by signing our proposal letter(Proposal#PK9805-03R), dated May 20, 1998. 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this study was to conduct a review of the previous geotechnical studies completed by others, and conduct at least one (1)test pit at the project site in order to formulate conclusions and provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations for the construction of the proposed Fueling Station and C-store. Our scope of work for this project as outlined in our proposal included the following: • A review of geotechnical report prepared by others for the project site; • a field surface reconnaissance of the site; • conducting a limited subsurface study consisting of logging (2)test pits; • verify the information presented in Earth Consultant's report dated Dec. 8, 1998; • a review of information in our files and library; • and the preparation of a geotechnical engineering report. This geotechnical engineering report addresses the surface and subsurface conditions at the site as observed in our test pits and from geotechnical reports prepared by others, presents geotechnical conclusions regarding suitability of the site for the proposed project, and provides preliminary geotechnical recommendations for the following: • Subgrade preparation and grading • Foundation design parameters • Slab-on-grade floors • Parking and driveway pavement • Site and building drainage 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION We were provided with a site plan prepared by RHL Design Group Inc., dated February 2, 1998, showing the foot print of the proposed Fueling Island and the C-store, location of underground storage tanks, parking area, and property boundaries. 1 June15, 19984:14S,_ Northern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 We understand that the proposed project will consist of the construction of a new gas station and car wash at the above referenced site with an approximately 2,700 square foot C- Store. Based on our conversations with you, we understand that the foundation plans have not been prepared as yet. We understand that the proposed C-Store building would consist of concrete block construction, and the proposed bearing pressures will not exceed 2,000 psf. A car wash is also proposed east of the proposed C-Store. The proposed fueling island will consist of eight (8) pumping stations, with a canopy utilizing eight (8) support columns. 4.0 SITE CONDITIONS 4.1 Surface Conditions The proposed project site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection between SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW, in Renton, Washington. The site had been recently cleared of all vegetation, and was devoid of any vegetation with the exception of one (1)tree located near the northwestern corner of the project site. At the time of our site visit (on June 15, 1998),the southern portion of the site was being utilized by Wilder Construction as staging area for the construction underway on the project site and surrounding area. The site exhibited relatively flat topography, with the western (1/3) portion of the site located at a slightly higher elevation (approximately 4 feet higher) then the eastern 2/3 of the property. A north-south trending drainage ditch was observed along the eastern property line. 4.2 Subsurface Conditions 4.2.1 Methodology Subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by conducting two (2)tracked hoe test pits on June 15, 1998. An engineering geologist from our firm located the test pits in the field by measuring relative to the property corners using the provided site plan and a measuring wheel. The locations of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan presented in Appendix A. These test pits were conducted to observe the subsurface soils and groundwater conditions at the site, and to verify the subsurface information presented in the soils report prepared by Earth Consultants Inc., dated December 8, 1998. Soil logs for the test pits are presented in Appendix B. Soil samples were obtained from the test pits and returned to our office for further review. The soils we observed during logging of the test pits were classified according to the Unified Soils Classification System (USCS), utilizing field classification procedures outlined in ASTM D 2488. A copy of the USCS is also presented in Appendix B. 2 June15, 19984:14SrirNorthern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 Depths referred to in this report are relative to the existing ground surface elevation at the time of our field investigation. The surface and subsurface conditions described in this report are as observed at the site at the time of our field investigation. 4.2.2 Soil Conditions The soil conditions at the site are generally characterized by variably-thick layer of topsoil overlying native silty sand and silt with minor to some fine sand as observed in the test pits conducted by us, and test pits and test borings conducted in the project area and its close proximity by others. The subsurface conditions observed in the test pits conducted on June 15, 1998, consisted of up to one and one-half(1 '/2) foot thick layer of top soil overlying native soils. The native soils observed below the top soil consisted of approximately four (4) foot thick layer of loose to medium dense silty sand with minor clay and a trace of gravel. This silty sand was gray to light brown in color, was heavily mottled and was wet. Underlying the silty sand, we encountered a soft to medium stiff silt in both of the test pits. This silt was tan to gray and heavily mottled in the upper three (3)to four(4) feet, and exhibited gray color below this elevation. This silt contained some fine grained sand and minor clay, with interbeds of silty fine sand. We also observed compressed peat layers in both the test pits. In Test Pit #1 the peat layers were observed to be approximately 1/10 of an inch in thickness and were interbedded with the silt. In Test Pit #2 an approximately one (1) foot thick layer of peat was observed at approximately twelve and one-half(12 'h) feet below the existing ground surface. Very strong hydrocarbon odor was detected in the soils at approximately four (4) feet below the existing ground surface in Test Pit #1. The soils excavated exhibited strong gasoline/diesel odor, and tested positive for a field sheen test. Hydrocarbon slicks were also observed along the test pit walls at approximately two (2) feet and four (4) feet below the existing ground surface. No hydrocarbon odor was detected in the soils excavated from test pit #2. Test Pit #1 was terminated at seven (7) feet below the ground surface (bgs.) due to the presence of contaminated soils. Test Pit #2 was terminated at a depth of approximately fourteen (14) feet below the ground surface due to excessive caving of the test pit side walls. 4.2.3 Groundwater Minor groundwater seepage was observed in Test Pit #2 at an approximate depth of nine and one-half(9 '/2) feet below the existing ground surface. For detailed test pit logs and soils descriptions, please refer to Appendix B. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that a shallow groundwater table may be present at the site during inclement weather as evidenced by the mottling of the native soils just below the topsoil. 3 June15, 1998Cry_ Northern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 4.3 Published Geology The geology of the site has been mapped by Waldron' (1962) as being near the contact between artificial fill (af) and alluvium (Qa). Uncontrolled fill and the native soils encountered at the site during our subsurface investigation correspond well with the mapped classification of the soils. The proposed project site lies within an area that has been mapped by Palmer2 to have a Liquefaction Susceptibility of Category I, which is defined by Palmer as areas consisting of fill and post-Vashon alluvium deposits with"High Liquefaction Susceptibility". 5.0 CONCLUSIONS We conclude that the site is geotechnically suitable for the proposed project provided that our geotechnical recommendations are followed during the design and construction phases of the project. Contaminated soils were observed in Test Pit #1 during our limited subsurface study. We strongly recommend that we be engaged to conduct a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to evaluate the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination, determine the propagation direction and size of the contaminant plume, determine if the groundwater has been impacted, and to trace the source of the contamination. Performing an environmental site assessment and testing of contaminated soils/groundwater is not part of our current scope of work. We would be happy to provide you with a scope of work and cost estimate for such a study upon your request. The Phase II ESA study must be completed prior to initiation of construction so that specific recommendations could be developed in time to address the on-site contamination, and to minimize potentially costly delays during construction. Furthermore, the owners should be notified of the situation immediately, so that they can undertake appropriate measures to safeguard their interests. It is our conclusion that the uncontrolled fill, topsoil, organic soils and loose native soils above the native medium dense/stiff soils are not appropriate for supporting structural loads since unacceptable amounts of differential settlement would occur. The site appears suitable for the proposed development if special precautions are used to minimize the potential for differential settlement. 'Waldron,H.H., 1962, "Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, Washington". 2 Palmer, S.P., 1992, "Preliminary Map of Liquefaction Susceptibility for Renton 7.5' Quadrangle, Washington". Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Open File Report 92-7. 4 June15, 1998 <Sri_ Northern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 We recommend that the structural loads including slab-on-grade floors be supported on a deep-seated pile foundation which penetrates below the fill and loose native materials into the native bearing soil. These foundations should also be designed to resist potential down-drag forces on the piles or other deep foundations. We have reviewed the recommendations provided in the report prepared by Earth Consultants Inc., dated December 8, 1997. Preloading the site is a suitable alternative; however, it may take considerably longer then 6 weeks to adequately preload the site for the proposed development. Furthermore, the preloading recommendation presented in the aforementioned report do not adequately address the liquefaction potential of the on-site soils. The on-site soils are extremely moisture sensitive due to the amounts of fine-grained material. We recommend that all earthwork take place during an extended period of dry weather to avoid excessive costs and construction problems associated with soil deterioration and the off-site effects of sedimentation and erosion. We recommend that we be engaged to review the final plans once they become available to provide any alternative or additional recommendations as necessary. Topsoil, uncontrolled fill, and loose native soils of variable thickness underlie the site. The results of field investigation conducted by Earth Consultants Inc. show that a medium dense bearing soil occurs in the vicinity of Test Pits # 1 and #2 at a depth of approximately twenty (20) feet below the existing grade, as shown on their boring log and test pit logs (Test Boring#5 conducted in May, 1996, and Test Pits#103 and #104 completed in October, 1997) presented in their report dated December 8, 1997. Based on our review of the aforementioned report, it is our preliminary opinion that approximately twenty-five (25) feet deep augured, cast-in-place piles would be required to transfer the proposed building and canopy loads to the native bearing soils. 6.0 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS The following geotechnical recommendations are preliminary as they are based on our understanding of the proposed project at this time. We recommend that we be engaged to review the project's plans in order to provide revised, augmented, or additional geotechnical recommendations as required. 6.1 Foundation Design We recommend the use of an auger cast pile foundation for the support of the proposed structure. We recommend against using driven piles, as driving the piles could cause damage to the surrounding buildings. We recommend that all structural elements of the proposed development including slab-on-grade floors be supported on a pile foundation. Our calculations suggest that minimum eighteen (18) inch diameter auger cast piles which penetrate the native bearing soils a minimum of five (5) feet may be safely loaded to twenty (20) tons per pile. We recommend 5 June15, 1998 41:1S;,_ Northern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 minimum grout strength of 3,000 psi to ensure pile quality. All piles should contain steel reinforcing and be spaced as per the structural engineer. The installation of the piles should be observed by our representative to confirm that adequate penetration is achieved. The presence of peat and loose soils will require that special care be taken during placement of the auger cast piles. The pile installation sequence should also be arranged so that each pile obtains sufficient initial set before any adjacent piles are installed. The auger cast pile and grade beam foundation should be designed by your structural engineer. The pile spacing and reinforcement and attachment to the grade beam should be provided on your plans. We should be engaged to review the plans prior to construction to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted. 6.2 Slab-on-Grade Floors We understand from the plans provided to us and from conversations with you that the proposed buildings will utilize slab-on-grade floors. Due to the presence of compressible soils and uncontrolled fill on-site and the potential for continued differential settlement, we recommend that all slab-on-grade floors be designed as pile supported structural slabs. If the on-site soil is used for forming the structural slab, then a four(4) inch layer of clean sand, pea gravel or crushed rock having less than five (5) percent material passing the #200 sieve, based on the fraction passing the#4 sieve, should be placed below the slab as a capillary break. We recommend that a vapor barrier be placed between the slab and capillary break. One (1)to two (2) inches of clean sand may be placed on top of the vapor barrier to aid in concrete curing. However, if you are willing to accept the risk of some differential settlement of the slab-on-grade floors, then we recommend that the slab-on-grade areas be overexcavated by at least three (3) feet. The exposed subgrade should then be scarified, and mechanically compacted to a non-yielding state. A geotextile fabric (Mirafi 500X or equivalent) should be placed over this subgrade, and the excavation should then be backfilled with a minimum of two (2) feet of 2 to 4 inch diameter quarry spalls. The quarry spalls should be placed in maximum one (1) foot thick lifts, and mechanically worked to a non-yielding state prior to the placement of the next lift. Subsequently, the slab-on-grade area should be brought to the desired grade with structural fill material that is placed in conformance with the recommendations presented in the Structural Fill section of this report. Capillary break and vapor barrier should be provided above this grade prior to the placement of the slab-on-grade floor. 6.3 UST Excavation Based on a review of the site plans provided by you, and our conversations with you, we understand that four (4) underground storage tanks (UST's) will be placed near the 6 June15, 1998 <cry_ Northern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 southeastern corner of the project site. We further understand that the bottom elevation of the proposed UST's will be approximately twelve (12) feet below the final site grade. We recommend that temporary cuts for the proposed UST excavations be sloped back to 1(H):1(V) or flatter grade. If this can not be achieved due to property line constraints, then temporary shoring should be provided along the sides of the excavation that can not be adequately sloped back. We recommend that we be engaged to observe these cuts to provide on-site recommendations for cut slope stability and dewatering of the excavations. Minor groundwater seepage was encountered in Test Pit #2 at approximately nine and one-half(9 'A) feet below the existing ground surface. We anticipate encountering groundwater in the UST excavations. It may become necessary to dewater the excavations to provide dry and safe working conditions for the construction crew. Dewatering of the cavity can be achieved by installing dewatering wells at specific locations, or by installing sumps within the excavations. Consequently, the site can be dewatered prior to initiating excavations for the proposed UST's. This would require the installation of dewatering wells along the corners of the proposed excavation and initiating dewatering at least 36 hours in advance of excavations. The dewatering activities would need to be closely monitored to mitigate any damage to the surrounding structures from induced settlements due to dewatering. It is imperative that samples of groundwater be collected and tested for contamination. The presence of hydrocarbon contamination would greatly effect the methodology implemented in the dewatering of the site for the placement of the proposed UST's. Adequate anchoring consisting of concrete anchor blocks should be provided to counteract the buoyant forces acting upon the proposed UST's below the ground water table. 6.4 Pavement Design We recommend that all topsoil, organic soils, and saturated soils be removed from the proposed parking/pavement areas. We recommend excavating the soils in the proposed parking and driveway areas by at least two (2) feet below the proposed final grade, and backfilling with structural fill. Once the site has been overexcavated, then the exposed subgrade should be mechanically compacted and proofrolled with a loaded dump truck. Any soft or yielding areas should be excavated and replaced with structural fill. If soft or saturated areas are extensive in area, it may be more economical to repair these areas with geotextile fabric such as Mirafi® 600X or equivalent prior to the placement of structural fill and the proposed pavement section. We recommend that all grading for the parking/driveway pavement take place during an extended period of dry weather. Wet weather would most likely result in difficult working conditions and additional costs associated with soil deterioration. 7 June15, 1998 4:1\3r_ Northern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 Our analysis of suitable pavement section options was based on design procedures outlined in the 1986 AASHTO Design Manual and our design experience with pavement sections in this area subjected to similar traffic loads. The analysis was based on estimated CBR and resilient modulus(Mr)values estimated from the results of our field investigation as well as previous experience with similar soil types. We were not provided with any traffic frequency and axle loads for the design of the parking lot pavement. The design ESALs (Equivalent Single Axle Loads)used in the analysis was estimated and is based on the inference that the proposed pavement will be utilized primarily by light traffic. We recommend that the pavement sections be placed on a properly prepared and approved subgrade consisting of firm native soils or properly placed and compacted structural fill. We recommend proofrolling the pavement subgrade by a loaded dump truck so that soft or yielding areas can be over-excavated and repaired with structural fill prior to the placement of the pavement section. Following is a pavement section based on WSDOT specifications, recommended for passenger cars: 3" Asphaltic Concrete(Class B) 6" Crushed Surfacing Base Course All base course materials shall be placed and mechanically compacted to a non-yielding state. We recommend that the base course material conform to the 1991 WSDOT Standard for Crushed Surfacing outlined in Section 9-03.9(3). The granular base course material shall be mechanically compacted to at least 95%of the maximum dry density value as determined by ASTM D -1557 test procedures. The asphaltic concrete shall meet Class B, pursuant to WSDOT 1994 standard specifications. 6.5 Site and Building Drainage The presence of silty soils at the site indicates drainage should be provided for the foundation perimeter. The foundation drainage system should consist of minimum four (4) inch diameter, perforated, rigid pipe placed (perforations downwards) along the exterior base of the foundation perimeter and tightlined to a storm drain system or other suitable outlet. The pipe should be bedded on at least two (2) inches of pea gravel and backfilled with a minimum of(12) inches of pea gravel. In order to minimize the risk of storm water backflow into footing drains, we recommend that roof downspouts be tightlined to a storm drain system or another suitable outlet separately from the footing drains. The site should be graded so that surface water runoff is directed to catch basins, which are attached to a storm sewer drain or other suitable outlet. 8 June15, 1998 <cry_ Northern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 If dewatering during construction is necessary, construction-dewatering procedures must include routing of water away from the excavations to a suitable outlet. Within excavations, we recommend that dewatering include routing of water to sump areas from where it may be pumped out to a suitable outlet. 6.6 Erosion Control In order to minimize erosion problems during construction, we recommend that construction take place during the dry summer months. To minimize the potential for significant adverse off-site effects during construction, we recommend that anchored plastic sheeting be placed on stockpiled soils after work hours and during extended periods of inactivity on the site. All erosion control measures should conform to the City of Renton requirements. We recommend all soils exposed by construction activities be protected against erosion immediately following construction. The soils should be hydroseeded and/or covered with planted vegetation. 6.7 Site Preparation The native soils found at the site are moisture sensitive and will deteriorate under wet weather conditions. We recommend that construction be done during an extended period of dry weather to avoid the adverse effects of wet weather conditions. All vegetation and topsoil should be removed from the building and parking areas. Detailed recommendations regarding subgrade preparation are presented in the Pavement Design section of this report. We recommend that temporary cuts into the native soils over four (4) feet in height be sloped back to 1(H):1(V) or flatter, or should be supported with shoring. We recommend that we be engaged to observe these cuts to provide on-site recommendations. We recommend that all permanent cuts be sloped at 2(H):1(V) grade or flatter. We recommend landscaping or hydroseeding exposed soils immediately after construction in order to minimize the potential for long term erosion. 6.8 Structural Fill The on-site soils are not suitable for placement as structural fill due to the presence of high content of fines. The fill should be placed at or slightly below the optimum moisture content. If the moisture content of the material exceeds the optimum, the material will not compact well and will have to be dried or discarded. We recommend that any fill soil that is imported to the site meet the following gradation: 9 June15, 1998 CS3r_ Northern, Inc. Project No. 298-801 Sieve Size Percent Passing 4 inch 100 #4 25-75 #200 5.0 maximum Based on the fraction passing the #4 sieve We recommend that we sample any imported fill material prior to placement to conduct necessary laboratory tests. We recommend that all fills be placed on a firm, horizontal subgrade that is free of organic material, standing water, loose soils or debris. The fill should be placed in horizontal, maximum eight (8) inch loose lifts and be compacted to at least 95% of the ASTM D 1557 maximum dry density value. We recommend that we be engaged to provide continuous inspection and testing of fills to verify proper placement and compaction of structural fills. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION MONITORING We recommend that we be engaged to observe the placement of the augured cast-in- place piles to verify adequate penetration into the bearing soils, to observe the stability of excavations, to observe the installation of drainage, to observe the dewatering activities, and to observe and test the placement of structural fill in areas requiring raising of grades. These recommendations are for engineering review and go beyond any testing agency involvement, which may be required for the project. 10 June 15, 1998 Project No. 298-801 GENERAL The recommendations provided in this report are based on our understanding of the project at this time. We expect to be engaged to review the final plans and work with you during the project development, in order to provide altered, augmented, or more detailed geotechnical recommendations as required. Our recommendations and conclusions are based upon observed site conditions and our site exploration, as well as the preliminary design information available to us at the time of our study, our engineering analysis, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care, skill and competence ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession in good standing currently practicing under similar conditions in this area only. No other warranty is expressed or implied. We are in no way responsible for the interpretation, modification or implementation of these recommendations by others. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from our subsurface investigation. Soil and groundwater conditions may vary from those encountered during this study. The nature and extent of variations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, we should be requested to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report and to modify or verify them in writing before proceeding with the construction. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of RHL Design Group, Inc., for specific application to the Southland site located at the intersection of SW 43rd Street and Oaksdale Avenue, SW in Renton, Washington, in accordance with generally accepted soils and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty is made, expressed or implied. We appreciate this opportunity to provide you with geotechnical engineering services for the proposed project. If you have any questions, feel free to contact us at an time. A. Sincerely, �4PoF wwsp,^t�,� GN NORTHERN, INC. Q h 40 Z OZ skr *4t7STOLV34429.)45 - 111 ‘N.\\<4 • 40,161„, " I Amjad I. Khan - As : '4 • ...3i]' eC' Principal Engineering Geologist Project Engineer APPENDIX A -\K1■ jr) \-: i �•••,..• o 1 N S4I,9Ir ST I utt ‘,' V.\ Yj a' �\g1. '._ '�_ �4 RYr ` i L S 19TH ' STs F/.ANLsoT T' irNIGACRES I I �' 70j'A h Pax NM. T�K�I(q. PKWY Visa • TIM I RACE su'zlsr.sr r 7�„ n Riffs TRACK '< 7� '-i RNCENTER R i � -,I y I 5�123RD;T _S _PP_ Sr= '' BAKER BLVD i $ - I R ., VICTORIA PARK ,fE r • >- s S a u t1�+rW l .4- —_ J — - .,_ .rt_ F_ - 44 71T- 1 \ Q G nn r',i R • BLYD CH 1E EL "\\ �, R�NTON SW 2TrN Sr �f/�� ys^" :� � °� �1 S *0 (TRECV 1NDo, � I I�,NCTION Tn,N y f, ys. R r. '`a, s / sw 29TH ST a\ 1,„,-, T-/ 16 ` Ai 31ST ST SN 30111 - ST 7151 91Yrx S< f5 5y N 33R0 A 33R0 ST \ .,IM CI 4rx COR T ` girf < ST DR II I l Al"'( w. h 1 i.i... .- a SH 31TN I 5T WRRORATt • ,1 S_Tit)sT ' OR S 1,M11kLFR BLVD 4, s 1 o f ' - L UPLAND I c • - Slr�38T11 91 TB7X ST U I sr __ __ )�. S =74iN ST 8tt1 to ns �lN �a MIDLAND / W AI 39TH 5T ,' Cl °� ' 17 RI L LA ,,� si ( I �a I E $J�N ST el _ _6 sAlmN ra sw ` IlST ST VALLEY L TRI IAMD DR I �EEDN{ULs n.' .':.. Site Location-. —180TH J /� ST $W 13Bn!•13 ST a SW J�/3RD mm $T St`q"sp GALE PARK_oft D 1 '^ 1 I 167 d�a Nytit51l1E 5`.• I BO xI' I s.AN ff' Y - -,. Llf - SVRINGBRDOK 1 'x s ,gyp i GREENBELT y i H "Dili _ REN ON 2�. S_1B6TN ST $_ LIR-1---•--s,_rru][A'e. --�.-. s --�—r—L_. I it /. . ST S nee ST 1 S 18B1M ST 188TH ST s_ITN STI R i IN i ST ) 1901H ST I II 1_4_,Tim <S 190TN i�I lNS 190TH ST io to,xR d _-.IIS_ 192ND_ ST ( S 192ND S 192N0 Sr S 192N0 '<' ST a , I ST. a �i E o 1911N 3 ST --s _..1— T 191TH� 5N 196TH S7 v - -9"` -- SE�13�i-i 3 196TH ST I a _ 1---T.i S 196TH ST ys I9fTH ..... 'I ' t-_ _ °' �� � 11I � ti �~ 198TH S S<19lTN sr 'gi' T M • w • a s 20DrMr6 200TN ST '< IS 200TH I,,S. s S'r I-- a VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 inch = 2400 feet. DATE: June 15, 1998 PROJECT NAME: Southland SW 43rd Street and Oakesdale Ave. SW site, Renton, Washington PROJECT NUMBER: 298-801 PROJECT MANAGER: AK Vicinity map is reproduced with the permission of Thomas Bros.Maps,and bears their registered copyright. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part of this map,whether for personal use or resale without permission. GN Northern, Inc. F: \PROJECT\: pendents\9433.30\dwg\94333.dwg Mon Mar 30 13: 48: 10 19' . 5 0115'45'W 220.9Y' r.. A. I I I I I H I I N..., I I 7 ' I . u C C1.r CO T HPiP! m c N cn cr _,. ;-..,--;trt....e) 4 sa, O N N o > e-0 DATE: REVISIONS: w _ li A-1 .� NEW C-STORE & FUEUNG FACILITY C a ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING N� w0 r n m7 $ N SITE PLAN SW 43RD ST do OAKESDALE AVE SW JP DEVELOPMENT N V J mN a RENTON, WASHINGTON _ i o ISSUE aa's 6049 PLAN �1`�i'� GINEERING ENVIRONMENTALARCHITECT SERVIRE • CESSERVICES THE CITY CENTER EAST In a„�ac AND 2711 N. HASKELL AVENUE 214-828-5580 •�`� PREUMNNRY DOCL11EM15 ... .,...�... CORPORATION DALLAS,TX 75204 i APPENDIX B T.P. #1 Soil Description & Classification T.P. #2 Soil Description & Classification 0 0 0-1.5 Topsoil: Dark brown silty sand 0-1.0 Topsoil: Dark brown silty sand with some organics, some gravel, with some organics, some gravel, saturated, loose. saturated, loose. 1.5-4.5 Silty Sand: With minor clay, 1.0-5.0 Silty Sand: With minor clay, trace gravel, gray to brown, mottled, trace gravel, gray to brown, mottled, loose to med. dense, wet (SM) loose to med. dense, wet (SM) -5 — -5 4.5-7.0 Silt: With some fine sand, 5.0-14.0 Silt: With some fine sand, minor clay, tan to gray, mottled, soft to minor clay, tan to gray, mottled, soft to med. stiff, saturated, (ML). With up to med. stiff, saturated, (ML). With up to 1/10 inch thick peat layers. 1 foot thick peat layers. S Groundwater observed at 9.5 ft. bgs. -10 — -10 Total Depth = 7.0 ft. bgs. Total Depth = 14.0 ft. bgs. -15 -15 Notes: Gasoline/diesel odor observed at approx. 4ft. Notes: Heavy caving of side walls, no gasoline odor. Conditions shown represent our observations at the time and location of the field work,modifications based on lab test,analysis,and geological and engineering judgement.These conditions may not exist at other times and locations,even in close proximity. This information was gathered as part of our investigation,and we are not responsible for any use or interpretation of the information by others. GN NORTHERN, INC. Date: 6/15/98 Project No. 298-801 Dwn.By: AK Geo/Eng: Amjad Khan I UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL LETTER DESCRIPTION y • ••. J •` Well- graded gravels or gravel - sand mixtures. • GW lo • • little or no lines CLEAN .•• ••w';;�a ...4-. ....r. GRAVELS 4:t:-s:;t:.4:. Poorly graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, GRAVEL & :t:f!!i.:�;:t.'::t it.1;';r ers:�:I. G p little or no lines GRAVELLY �� 'y'4' SOILS ' , , , , GM Silly gravels or gravel -sand-silt mixtures GRAVELS WITH FINES 7 COARSE GC Clayey gravels or gravel-sand-clay mixtures GRAINED • i‘ Well-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or SOILS CLEAN •••• �•••� SW no fines SANDS Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little SAND a S p or no fines SANDY .‘:,,: '+t.• - SOILS :.\::` .i ': Silty sands or sand-silt mixtures SANDS I. `•=:'`i WITH FINES SC Clayey sands or sand-clay mixtures Inorganic silts & very line sands, rock hour silty ML or clayey fine sands, or clayey silts with slight SILTS & CLAYS j j,,I plasticity./A: y CI. Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silly clays or lean clays Liquid Limit Less Than 50 I I i I I i i Organic silts & organic silty clays of low • FINE IIIIIII OL IIIIIII plasticity GRAINED IIIIIII SOILS MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous line sandy or silty soils, elastic silts SILTS & CLAYS CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays Liquid Limit Greater Than 50 ;,�,�,�,f Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, . . . � /� OH, , , , organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ^ , =� PT Peat or other highly organic soils TOPSOIL Humus & duff layer FILL =w= Uncontrolled, with highly variable constituents SYM DATUM NOTE SYM DATUM NOTE BOL BOL I2"0.D. Split Spoon Sampler Sample Interval Water Level Date Recorded TTRing or Shelby Sampler Sample Interval Ts Torvane Reading 1P Sampler Pushed Sample Interval qu Penetrometer Reading C Other Sample Type Sample Interval ■ Water Observation Well Tip Elevation • GN NORTHERN, INC. KEY CHAR T it PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW # 98 —0 Z �' "U DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ❑ OTHER APPLICANT: RacwAR p 614 NI pc-r-T RECEIVED FROM CAI G{7/gg JOB ADDRESS: S A) y3'd Sr. 4- 04kess<r1..g Ave Sul WO# a e)) NATURE OF WORK: 7-/l/c ,Sie r/ 12tr7-4ie._ GREEN# pa SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 41 OTHER or VESTED 0 NOT VESTED 5-CGRt 01)-71 ON Da c.,syg 4-77 c, ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review I dated . L 2,30g 3 0 Y—9 UYS \')Q ❑ PARENT PI (subject change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# ) ❑ King Co.Taxx Acct,cctA�(new) It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER 7Ybl 3y FF $'//,2�s/f=F 7 E. D Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER • Si: ial Assessment DutrictlWASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District * Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x A S6,Q4-6 ,-- o,v (,4y a Hfi5 Nor O Cceir�, Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft. of property (not less than S850.00)x 6 9, 5'7 9X a`' 7 903 ,iO Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2$oo ceM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ® ,a Erg- 4.--vJ ' #9 9—6 ZS 4-,pu�S ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) * Never Pd /, tom.-c-t r 7—F}� 'G,QE 6 7 , ) Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x or Co—'-+ aoc_&-7 7) P,,Qro2 7z3. Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x /4PPL (-( -7-7O n/ )# &-,-ie pgi /TK- Apartment Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property (not less than S585.00)x 6 9, 959 . $'C-- . 2- REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: ew-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ■ Never Pd Si :le famil residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties $0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than$385.00) (o/,//.' ° ' , Tr3 PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ ft - w' S� A/Qg- Signature of Revie Authority DATE pip *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. I **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. c:/wnptate/feeapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord. Nos. 4506,4507,4508,4525, and 4526 4 S. Q0 fD