HomeMy WebLinkAboutContract ,
CAG-17-066
�.�..._—._..__
�.�����r ,
--- �� r� .�! r� �a_r� ���
AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT, PHASE I CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS & DESIGN
CAG-17- 066
THIS AGREEMENT, dated February 1, 2017, is by and between the City of Renton (the "City"), a
Washington municipal corporation, and Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"), an
Oregon corporation.The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Agreement as
the "Parties." Once fully executed by the Parties, this Agreement is effective as of the last date
signed by both parties.
1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide consultant services as specified in Exhibit
A, which is attached and incorporated herein and may hereinafter be referred to as the
"Work."
2. Chan�es in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order
changes to the Work consisting of additions, deletions or modifications. Any such
changes to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall
be equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth in Exhibit D or as otherwise
mutually agreed by the Parties.
3. Time of Performance: Consultant shall commence performance of the Agreement
pursuant to the schedule(s)set forth in Exhibit B. All Work shall be performed by no later
than January 31, 2018.
4. Compensation:
A. Amount. Total compensation to Consultant for Work provided pursuant to this
Agreement shall not exceed $517,228.00, plus any applicable state and local sales
taxes. Compensation shall be paid based upon Work actually performed according to
the rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibits C and D. The Consultant agrees that any
hourly or flat rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated
rate(s) unless otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibit D. Except as
specifically provided herein,the Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of
any taxes imposed as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement.
B. Method of Pavment. On a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter
in which Work is performed,the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in a form
specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the
Page 1 of 10
,
name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for
such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all
Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30)
calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the
voucher or invoice. If the Consultant's performance does not meet the requirements
of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply
with the Agreement.The City may withhold payment for work that does not meet the
requirements of this Agreement.
C. Effect of Pavment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by
the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the
Consultant to perform the Work or for any breach of this Agreement by the
Consultant.
D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for
payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be
obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the
current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all
remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to
the City in the event this provision applies. The City will notify Consultant in writing
in advance of any future fiscal period that sufficient funds are not allocated for
payment under this agreement.
5. Termination:
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without
cause by giving ten (10) calendar days' notice to the Consultant in writing. In the
event of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents, data,
studies, worksheets, models and reports, or other material prepared by the
Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are
required as part of the Work.
B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City,the Consultant shall be entitled
to payment for all hours worked to the effective date oftermination, less all payments
previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the City after partial performance
of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the
Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the
City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance
of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be
deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment shall be made by
the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of
termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City.
6. Warranties And Ri�ht To Use Work Product: Consultant represents and warrants that
Consultant will perform all Work identified in this Agreement in a professional and
Page 2 of 10
workmanlike manner and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards
and laws in effect in the same or similar local and during the time of performance of this
Agreement. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing
the Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria
. and Standard Plans for Road, Bride and Municipal Construction). Professional engineers
shall certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant
to RCW 18.43.070. Consultant further represents and warrants that all final work product
created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work
of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance which would
restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non-
exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and
display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement. The City's or other's
adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of
this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Reuse or modification of
such Work by the City or others shall be without liability to Consultant.
7. Record Maintenance: The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and Work provided in the
performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by
applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six
years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access
to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit
expenditures and charges and/or to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act
(Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or
termination of this Agreement.
8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply
with the Washington State Public Records Act,Consultant shall make a due diligent search
of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work,
including, but not limited to, e-mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages,
recordings, photos,or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event
Consultant believes said records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at
Consultant's own expense, seek judicial protection. Consultant shall indemnify, and hold
harmless the City for all costs,including reasonable attorneys'fees,attendant to any claim
or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant has responsive
records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein,
or not provided them to the City within a reasonable period of time after receipt of
written request by City for the records. Consultant shall produce for distribution any and
all records responsive to the Public Records Act request in a timely manner, unless those
records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section shall survive the
expiration or termination of this Agreement.
9. Independent Contractor Relationship:
Page 3 of 10
A. The Consultant is retained by the City only for the purposes and to the extent set forth
in this Agreement. The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the
City during the period of the Work shall be that of an independent contractor, not
employee. The Consultant, not the City, shall have the power to control and direct
the details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation,
the Consultant shall have no obligation to work any particular hours or particular
schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of
attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work.
Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work
covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other
workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper,
provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it
alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent
for the City.
B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal
income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance
Program,or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant
or any employee of the Consultant.
C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual,the
Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant
retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any
losses the City may sustain through the Consultant's failure to do so.
10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, and hold harmless the City,
elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any and all
claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings,
judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties,
expenses, reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and
all persons or entities, to the extent caused by negligent acts, errors or omissions of the
Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a breach of this Agreement by
Consultant, except for that portion of the claims caused by the City's sole negligence.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW
4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence relative to
construction,alteration, improvement,etc.,of structure or improvement attached to real
estate...) then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the
Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, Consultant's
liability shall be only to the extent of Consultant's negligence.
It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in
this Agreement constitute Consultant's waiver of immunity under the Industrial
Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties
Page 4 of 10
have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall
survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
11. Gifts and Conflicts: The City's Code of Ethics and Washington State law prohibit City
employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any
person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance
with the City's Code of Ethics and state law,the Consultant shall not give a gift of any kind
to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a
business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was,
is, or will be involved in selecting the Consultant, negotiating or administering this
Agreement, or evaluating the Consultant's performance of the Work.
12. Citv of Renton Business License: The Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton
Business License prior to performing any Work and maintain the business license in good
standing throughout the term of this agreement with the City. Information regarding
acquiring a city business license can be found at:
http://rentonwa.�ov/business/default.aspx?id=548&mid=328. Information regarding
State business licensing requirements can be found at:
http://dor.wa.�ov/content/doin�business/re�istermvbusiness/
13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain:
A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for
each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement.
B. In the event that Work delivered pursuant to this Agreement either directly or
indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and
Omissions coverage shall be provided with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per
occurrence. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any
Work provided by a licensed professional or Work that requires a professional
standard of care.
C. Workers' compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the
State of Washington, shall also be secured.
D. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non-owned,leased,hired
or non-owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single
limit, if there will be any use of Consultant's vehicles on the City's Premises by or on
behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes.
E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general
liability policy on a non-contributory primary basis. The City's insurance policies shall
not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of
any insurance required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of
Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City's
recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
Page 5 of 10
F. Subject to the City's review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the
proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work.
G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation,within
two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice.
' 14. Delavs: Consultant is not responsible for delays caused by factors beyond the
Consultant's reasonable control. When such delays beyond the Consultant's reasonable
control occur,the City agrees the Consultant is not responsible for damages, nor shall the
Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement.
15. Successors and Assi�ns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or
encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement without the
written consent of the other.
16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the
appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time
to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, by facsimile or by nationally recognized overnight courier service. Time period
for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT
facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following
transmission. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the
Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement.
City of Renton: Consultant:
David M. Christensen Jeff Kreshel, P.E.
1055 South Grady Way 601 Union Street, Suite 622
Renton, WA 98057 Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: (425) 430-7212 Phone: (206) 462-7030
dchristensen@rentonwa.gov Jeff.Kreshel@msa-ep.com
Fax: (425) 430-7241 Fax: (866) 274-9807
17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational
qualification,the Consultant agrees as follows:
A. Consultant, and Consultant's agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers
with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall
not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital
status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement
provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any
sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational
qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application
for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits
under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies.
Page 6 of 10
;
B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and
that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed,
color, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, physical, sensory or mental
handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the
following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment
advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and
selection for training.
C. If the Consultant fails to comply with any of this Agreement's non-discrimination
provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in
whole or in part.
D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state
and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the
project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation,
and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton
Council Resolution Number 4085.
18. Miscellaneous: The parties hereby acknowledge:
A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant.
B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent
specifically agreed within the attached exhibits.
C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and / or materials necessary to perform the Work
except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits.
D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to
provide Work he / she will acquire or maintain such at his/ her own expense and, if
Consultant employs, sub-contracts,or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform
the Work,said employee/sub-contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such
training, licensing, or certification.
E. This is a non-exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to
other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of
Work called for in this Agreement.
F. Consultant is responsible for his / her own insurance, including, but not limited to
health insurance.
G. Consultant is responsible for his/ her own Worker's Compensation coverage as well
as that for any persons employed by the Consultant.
19. Other Provisions:
A. Approval Authoritv. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City
and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to
execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant.
Page 7 of 10
B. General Administration and Mana�ement. The City's project manager is David M.
Christensen. In providing Work, Consultant shall coordinate with the Cit�s contract
manager or his/her designee.
C. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an
instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties.
D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this
Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to
this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for
which they are referenced within this Agreement. To the extent a Consultant
prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains
terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the
body of this Agreement shall prevail and the extraneous terms shall not be
incorporated herein.
E. Governin� Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of
Renton. Consultant and all of the Consultant's employees shall perform the Work in
accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and
ordinances.
F. Joint Draftin� Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared
by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the
other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of
negotiation, drafting or execution.
G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce
or interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the
King County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice
Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or successor.
H. Severabilitv. A court of competent jurisdiction's determination that any provision or
part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.
I. Sole and Entire A�reement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not
incorporated are excluded.
J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of
its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set
forth in the description of the Work is essential to the Consultant's performance of
this Agreement.
K. Third-Partv Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be
construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the
Page 8 of 10
Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will
be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else.
L. Assi�ns and Successors.The Parties each bind themselves,their partners, successors,
assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the
partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with
respect to all covenants of the Agreement.
M. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party's
failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not
prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other
provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this
Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach
unless it is expressly waived in writing.
N. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together
constitute this one Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date
last signed by the Parties below.
CITY OF RENTON CONSULTANT
By: G� By:
De is Law Jeffrey S. el .E.
Mayor Principal En ineer
4�3/�� ���,���
--,
Date Date
Attest
. .`��`�`p�I'�+�M
+��
� .� '''�.
� ,�� � �? � �•G�``����„���,nua,,,�����p���
Jaso A. Set MC = iR �'; %
Cit Clerk : 't : s E A L = #=
_ .. _ �• ; =
Approved as to Legal Form 'y�°�►����'' „ ,��''��,�°w;
', .o '� ��u������ . .
'����i��R'd;ED SEp�6�����`
�.t�'�.�„�
Lawrence J. Warren
Renton City Attorney
Page 9 of 10
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF RENTON
DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
PHASE I: CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS & DESIGN
CONSULTANT SERVICES
SCOPE OF SERVICES
This scope of services describes the engineering and other consultant services to be
performed by Murray, Smith &Associates, Inc. (MSA) and subconsultants—BHC
Consultants (stortnwater),KPG, Inc. (surveying),Kleinfelder, Inc. (geotechnical),
GeoEngineers, Inc. (environmental and permitting),Anchor/QEA, Inc. (cultural resources),
and Envirolssues (public information/outreach) for Phase I—Conceptual Analysis and
Design of the City of Renton's (City) Downtown Utility Improvements Project.
In general, this work is intended to evaluate the existing water, sewer, and stormwater utility
systems including identifying deficiencies, determining alternatives (if applicable),
developing a conceptual design and making recommendations for system improvements to
be implemented to address the future developed condition within the defined study area of
downtown Renton. The study area focuses on S 2nd Street and S 3rd Street and varies by as
defined per the following:
• Water System—Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern
boundary), S 2nd Street(northern boundary), S 3rd Street(southern boundary).
• Sewer System—Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern
boundary), S Tobin Street- one block north of S 2nd Street (northern boundary), and
S 4th Street- one block south of S 3rd Street(southern boundary).
• Stormwater System—Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern
boundary), S Tobin Street- one block north of S 2nd Street(northern boundary), S
4th Street- one block south of S 3rd Street(southern boundary). The study area also
includes the drainage area to the north of S Tobin St, and including several existing
outfalls to the Cedar River.
Replacement, rehabilitation and/or upsizing of the individual utilities are anticipated due to
age, capacity needs, condition and/or maintenance requirements. S 2nd Street and S 3rd
Street are major arterial roadways located within the City's Center powntown area and are
lined by a variety of commercial businesses, Renton High School, and numerous other mixed
use properties and contain several other utilities, both public and private.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Clients�ReMon,City oftDowa[owu Utility Improvements 2016 9-16�Contract�E�A-Scope-Dowrtown Utility Impmvements Project 2-1-17.doc Page 1
The scope of services for Phase I, Conceptual Analysis & Design, of the project is based on
our understanding of the City's needs for coordinated utility improvements gained from
several meetings, discussions, and preliminary input from City staff. We understand it is the
City's desire to have Phase I work completed as soon as possible but by no later than the
Summer of 2017. We also understand that the project costs are intended to be distributed
amongst the three individual City utility funds. �
Proposed Work Scope
The following efforts are anticipated.
1. Project Management:
Provide project management, coordination, and administration through completion of
Phase I of the project. These efforts include those associated with management of the
consultant team and preparation of monthly invoices. A senior engineer (not directly as-
sociated with the project)will also review draft documents for completeness, clarity, co-
ordination, and/or other quality considerations.
Deliverable(s):
• Monthly invoice and progress report
Assumption(s):
• The budget assumes a project duration of up to six (6) consecutive calendar
months, ending no later than July 31, 2017.
2. Communication/Coordination/Meeting(s):
Maintain regular communications (phone, facsimile, e-mail) and coordinate with City
utility personnel to exchange information, discuss related issues, review and discuss
project goals and objectives, and coordinate efforts. This coordination will vary
depending on the utility and the work under Phase I of the project, as noted below and
defined in the level of effort and fee estimate.
2.1 Water Utility
Communicate and meet with City water utility personnel to review and discuss the
project's progress, work activities, and continued design development.
2.2 Sewer Utiliry
Communicate and meet with City sewer utility personnel to review and discuss the
project's progress, work activities, and continued design development.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\ClientsUtenton,City oflDowntown Utility Improvemeuts 2016 9-16�Contrac[�Exh A-Scope-Dowutown Utility Improvements Peoject 2-1-17.doc Page 2
2.3 Stormwater Utility
Communicate and meet with City stormwater utility personnel to review and discuss
the project's progress, work activities, and continued design development. Addition-
ally, hold conference phone call (on up to a bi-weekly basis, as needed) with City
stormwater utility staff and design team.
Deliverable(s):
• Correspondence, e-mails, and other documentation
• Meetings notes
Assumption(s):
• The above referenced meetings are anticipated to be held jointly with sew-
er, water and stormwater utility City staff to facilitate coordination of
Phase I of the project. It is anticipated that up to four (4) meetings will be
held.
• The Project Manager and Design Lead or Assist. PM (as appropriate) will
attend the meetings.
3. General Information Collection and Review:
Collect and review existing available City information - documents, as-builts, and other
pertinent available information related to the general anticipated overall project and
existing utility systems. Meet with City personnel to:
• Understand and identify the City's existing utility systems, City planned roadway
improvements and timing, and other existing or planned infrastructure or future
zoning and development in the vicinity of the project.
• Review and discuss the overall project goals and objectives,understanding and
requirements of desired improvements, and potential schedule and work plan.
Deliverable(s):
• N/A
Assumption(s):
• The City will provide the following information: relevant engineering data,
plans, specifications, reports/studies, topographical or other mapping,
physical system information (as-builts), and/or other pertinent information
available about the City's existing water, sewer, and stormwater utility sys-
tem/facilities relevant to the project, applicable City standards, design cri-
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements �
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\CGeMs�ReMoq City oflDo�wtowa Utility Improvements 2016 9-16\Contract�Ex6 A-Scope-Downtown Utility Impmvements Project 2-1-17.doc Page 3
teria, requirements, and/or preferences, deemed necessary for Phase I
work. As described above and herein, except as otherwise specifically
identified, pertinent data and information required for determining and
evaluating the existing conditions (capacity and other operat-
ing/performance characteristics) as well as potential future needs and re-
quirements will be provided by the City.
• Inspection of existing facilities or field measurements or other quantifica-
tion of system characteristics and/or conditions, except as otherwise specif-
ically identified, is not included as part of Phase I efforts.
4. Water System Improvements:
This task focuses on the existing water system and improvements (distribution and
transmission mains only) within the defined study area and includes data and existing
system review and based primarily on the City's direction regarding the identification of
improvements needed for future redevelopment. The following work elements are
included in this task:
• Additional Data Collection and Review/Kick-Off Meeting/ Site Visit
o Work with the City to refine the limits of the study area and prepare a study
area map for the water distribution and transmission facilities.
o Collect and review available City information including existing reports, as-
builts, GIS data, AutoCAD files, aerial photography, and other pertinent in-
formation to further understand, identify, and define the City's existing water
system within the study area. This task will focus on information related to
current system characteristics and conditions relevant to the project.
o Hold a kick-off ineeting with City water utility personnel.
o Visit site with City staff to observe known problem areas and potential con-
cerns related to the project.
• Existing System Review
Review the existing system within the study area. The following efforts are in-
cluded:
o Define existing collection/conveyance system characteristics using GIS and
other gathered information.
o Work with City defined future condition land use characteristics related to the
water system using the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
map dated July 1, 2015.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Clients�Rentoq City oflDowntown U[ility Improvements 2016 9-16�ContracflEnh A-Scope-Downtowv Utility I�rovements Projat 2-1-17.doc Page 4
o Review existing available data from the City (GIS, survey, record drawings,
reports, and other gathered information) within the water main network.
• Identification of Water System Improvements
Per the City's direction, water main improvements axe anticipated to consist of
replacing all existing mains within the study area that are under 12-inch diameter
with new 12-inch diameter mains. Develop a conceptual plan/layout for
improving the City's water system within the study area. The plan/layout will be
developed for consideration relative to City goals and functional requirements.
The conceptual design will be to a sufficient level of detail to identify required
general elements/facilities/features. Existing available City GIS mapping and data
will be used to identify and illustrate the City water system improvements
conceptual plan/layout. The conceptual design and project recommendations will
be documented in a brief technical memorandum.
o Through collaboration with City staff, identify and define proposed
improvements - description,project elements, preliminary sizing, and layout of
major pipelines/facilities (only);
o Schematic figures (plan only) illustrating conceptual system improvements
and layout/alignments; and
o A recommendation regarding a preferred plan/layout considering the
conceptual design described above along with other applicable considerations
agreed to with the City.
o Coordinate with Seattle Public Utilities (SPL� for evaluation of cathodic
protection monitoring system requirements at crossings of new City water
mains over SPU's pipelines.
o Document task work in a brief technical memorandum to be used as the basis
for continued design development.
o Hold up to two (2) meetings to review and discuss potential system improve-
ments.
Deliverable(s):
• Water study area map
• Meetings and site visit notes
• Technical Memorandum
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\ClieMsUtenton,City oflDowntown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16�Convact�Exh A-Scope-Dowrtown Utility Impmvements Projea 2-1-17.doc Page 5 ��,..
Assumption(s):
• Per the City's direction, design of water utility system facilities does not
include a hydraulic analysis or other evaluation of the existing system
(condition, or capacity) including both within and beyond the project lim-
its.
5. Sewer System Evaluation:
This task focuses on the evaluation of the existing sewer system (main collection and
interceptor conveyance only) within the defined study area and includes data review,
field reconnaissance, design requirement determination, review of the hydraulic analyses
by other based on City defined peak design flow, to identify improvements needed for
future redevelopment. The following work elements are included in this task:
• Additional Data Collection and Review/Kick-Off Meeting/ Site Visit
o Work with the City to refine the limits of the study area and prepare a study
area map for the sewer collection and conveyance facilities.
o Collect and review available City information including existing reports, as-
builts, GIS data, AutoCAD files, aerial photography, and other pertinent in-
formation to further understand, identify, and define the City's existing sewer
system within the study area. This task will focus on information related to
current system characteristics and conditions relevant to the project.
o Hold a kick-off ineeting with City sewer utility personnel
o Visit site with City staff to observe known problem areas and potential con-
cerns related to the project.
• Existing System Capacity Analysis and Future Development Sewer Flow Charac-
terization
Review the existing system within the study area to identify or further evaluate
potential deficiencies with the existing sewer network. A hydraulic analysis and/or
modeling (by others) will be performed to evaluate existing conditions within the
study area to identify or further evaluate problems with the existing sewer network
and define design flow rates for future improvements. The following efforts are
included:
o Review applicable design standards and criteria; project conditions, con-
straints, and considerations; and performance or other related requirements for
project improvements.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\CGeMsUtentoq City oflDowntown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16�Contesct�Exh A-Scope-Doavtown Utility I�rovements Project 2-1-17.doc Page 6
o Develop design criteria for the sewer system hydraulic analysis/model and sys-
tem evaluation.
o Define existing collection/conveyance system characteristics using GIS and
other gathered information.
o Work with City defined future condition land use characteristics related to the
sewer analysis using the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land
Use map dated July 1, 2015. Develop flow characteristics for future develop-
ment build-out conditions.
o Review available data(GIS, survey, record drawings, reports, and other gath-
ered information) and identify potential data gaps within the sewer pipe net-
work. For scoping purposes, it will be assumed that available data is sufficient
for preliminary modeling evaluation and only minor data gaps are anticipated.
o Identify portions of the City's system that require hydraulic analysis by the
City's modeling consultant (re: interceptor capacity requirements).
o Perform hydraulic analysis (re: sewer collection mains only, interceptors by
others) for the sewer system to evaluate sewer flow conditions and system ca-
pacity requirements.
o Identify existing system deficiencies
o Document task work in a brief technical memorandum to be used as the basis
for continued design development.
o Hold up to three (3) meetings to review model development, evaluation re-
sults, and needs for improvements.
Deliverable(s):
• Sewer study area map
• Meetings and site visit notes
• Technical Memorandum
Assumption(s):
• Sewer interceptor modeling and sizing determination/verification will be
provided by the City's hydraulic modeling consultant.
6. Stormwater (Conveyance) System Evaluation:
This task focuses on the evaluation of the existing stormwater system (trunk pipeline
conveyance only) within the defined study area and includes data review, field reconnais-
sance, regulatory and design requirements determination, and hydraulic analyses of build-
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Clients�Rentoq City oflDowutown Utility Improvemonts 2016 9-16�ConVact�Ezh A-Scope-Do�wtown Utility I�rovements Project 2-1-17.doc Page 7
—
out hydrologic conditions to identify improvements needed for future redevelopment.
This evaluation excludes roadway drainage (collection facilities), flow control, and water
quality treatment facility analyses. The following work elements are included in this task
as specifically defined below and in the subconsultant's proposal.
• Additional Data Collection and Review/Kick-Off Meeting/ Site Visit
o Work with the City to refine the limits of the study area and prepare a study
area map for the stormwater conveyance and downstream system connections
or outfalls.
o Collect and review available City information including existing reports, as-
builts, GIS data, AutoCAD files, aerial photography, and other pertinent in-
formation to further understand, identify, and define the City's existing
stormwater system within the project area. This task will focus on information
related to current system characteristics and conditions relevant to the project.
o Hold a kick-off ineeting with City stormwater personnel
o Visit site with City staff to observe known problem areas and potential con-
cerns related to the project.
o Document data review, etc. in a brief technical memorandum to be used as the
basis for continued analysis and design development.
• Regulatory Requirements
o Review the regulatory environment related to the existing conditions within
the study area along with standards and requirements for future development.
o Other potential design requirements related to the proposed developed condi-
tion(s) will be identified, including but not limited to flow control, water quali-
ty, and green stormwater infrastructure based on current stormwater regula-
tions.
o Depending on the condition of the existing stormwater outfalls, some outfalls
may need repair, upgrade, or replacement. These will be identified through in-
put from the City and existing and future conditions hydrologic and hydraulic
modeling. The regulatory requirements related to potential outfall mainte-
nance, repair, and replacement will be identified.
o Document regulatory requirements in a brief technical memorandum to be
used as the basis for continued analysis and design development.
• Existing Conveyance Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Clients�ReMoq City oflDowntown Utility Improvea�nts 2016 9-16�Contract�Exh A-Scope-Downtown Utility ImprovemeMs Project 2-1-17.doc Page 8
Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling will be performed for the existing conditions
within the study area to identify or further evaluate City known and identified
problems with the existing storm drainage network and define design flow rates
for future improvements. The following efforts are proposed for the existing con-
ditions hydrologic and hydraulic modeling within the study area:
o Review applicable design standards and criteria; project conditions, con-
straints, and considerations; and performance or other related requirements for
project improvements.
o Define drainage basin limits using GIS and other gathered information. Identi-
fy existing and future basin characteristics/system requirements.
o Work with City defined future condition land use characteristics related to the
stormwater analysis using the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Zoning
Land Use map dated July 1, 2015.
o Review available data (GIS, survey, record drawings, reports, and other gath-
ered information) and identify potential data gaps within the drainage network.
For scoping purposes, it will be assumed that available data is sufficient for
preliminary modeling evaluation and only minor data gaps are anticipated.
o Develop a hydrologic/hydraulic model (model development) of the City's ex-
isting system and tributary drainage basin(s).
o Perform hydraulic modeling and analysis of the existing conveyance system.
o Hydrologic analysis of build-out condition through existing conveyance sys-
tem.
o Model results including the level of service or capacity of each pipe within the
study area will be presented on a plan map.
o Document task work in a brief technical memorandum to be used as the basis
for continued analysis and design development.
o Hold up to three (3) meetings to review verify boundary conditions, model de-
velopment, analysis, and results.
* For further details and applicable assumptions — see 1/11/2017 BHC Con-
sultants proposal (copy attached)
Deliverable(s):
• Stormwater study area map
• Meetings and site visit notes
• Technical Memorandum
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\ClieMs�Rentoq City oflDowmown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16�Contract�Exh A-Scope-Downtown Utility Improvements Project 2-1-1').doc PBgC 9 �,
Assumption(s):
• Basin delineation will be based on GIS mapping from the City. Field veri-
fication of drainage basin boundaries is not included.
• Design of stormwater conveyance system does not include a detailed or
comprehensive hydraulic analysis or evaluation of the existing downstream
or upstream system or river (characteristics, condition, or capacity)beyond
the study limits and that defined herein. If such an analysis, beyond that
which is identified herein, is determined to be necessary following the ini-
tial analysis for the project, additional budget may be required.
• Stormwater detention, water quality treatment, and roadway drainage anal-
yses are not included as part of these efforts; but could be added to the
scope of work if desired.
• Floodplain/floodway issues, concerns, conditions, or requirements are not
evaluated as part of these efforts.
7. Survey Control and Data Collection:
Provide limited surveying and related services to support Phase I project efforts. Estab-
lish survey control for the project and collect limited City sewer and stormwater system
information and data within the study area (as needed) including structures, facilities or
features that may influence the Phase I evaluation. The following work elements are in-
cluded in this task as specifically defined below and in the subconsultant's proposal.
7.1 Survey Control Establishment
Conduct a field control survey within the study area to tie the project to local hori-
zontal and vertical monumentation- see assumptions. Establish vertical and horizon-
tal control using the City's preferred datum: Horizontal Datum—NAD83/91 and
Vertical Datum—NAVD88. Where appropriate, establish temporary benchmarks to
be utilized during the final design and construction phases of the project.
7.2 Sewer Utility Data Collection
Conduct a limited field survey to obtain additional sewer system facility or feature
information and data as necessary based on identified system data gaps required for
the Phase I evaluation along the project corridor(s).
7.3 Stormwater Utility Data Collection
Conduct a limited field survey to obtain additional stormwater system facility or fea-
ture information and data as necessary based on identified system data gaps required
for the Phase I evaluation along the project corridor(s).
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\ClieMs�Renton,Ciry ofU)owntown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16\Contract�Exh A-Scope-Dowvtown Utility Improvements Project 2-1-17.doc Page 10
* For further details and applicable assumptions — see 1/11/2017 KPG, Inc.
proposal (copy attached)
Deliverable(s):
• Project Control Survey
• Limited Sewer and Stormwater Data
Assumption(s):
• For the purpose of developing the scope and fee estimate data collection of
the sewer and stormwater utility will require up to two days of field work
for each utility.
8. Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Review:
Provide initial, limited geotechnical engineering and related services relative to Phase I of
the project. The geotechnical engineering and related services will include review of
readily available existing geotechnical, geologic and hydrogeologic data for the project
vicinity and provide a preliminary letter report identifying anticipated soil and
groundwater conditions and general geotechnical recommendations for project design
and construction. The following work elements are included in this task as specifically
defined below and in the subconsultant's proposal.
• Collect Existing Geotechnical Data—Collect readily available existing data for
the project area to gain an overview of general geologic and hydrogeologic condi-
tions and to aid in identifying geotechnical factors that might have an impact on
the design and construction of the proj ect.
• Monitoring Well Water Levels Check—Identify existing monitoring wells that
may be present in public right-of-way and probe water levels.
• Collect Environmental Records Database and Files—Collect readily available
state and federal regulatory agency records using a commercial database service
of known contaminant releases and regulated facilities that may help identify en-
vironmental concerns within the project area. Additionally, collect some histori-
cal records to develop an overall understanding of the site history and environ-
mental concerns.
� Conduct Site Reconnaissance—Perform a site reconnaissance to obtain infor-
mation regarding current uses and apparent environmental concerns within the
project area. The reconnaissance will include a walking and driving tour of public
access areas and will not include entering private property or interviewing proper-
ty owners or tenants.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Cliems�ReMoq Ciry oflDowmowu Utility Improvemems 2016 9-16\Co�ract�Ezh A-Scope-Do�wtown Utilay ImprovemeMs Project 2-1-17.doc Page 11
• Review Data and Prepare Summary Letter Report—Review and summarize the
information collected in the above tasks. Prepare a summary letter report includ-
ing a generalized data summary to document the reviewed data. Discuss antici-
pated soil and groundwater conditions in the project area. Provide preliminary
comments on the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction based on
the information reviewed and anticipated conditions. Identify those areas with the
potential for soil and/or groundwater contamination. Tabulate data of properties
with addresses, regulated facilities/reported releases, site reconnaissance findings,
and potential for impacts to soil and/or groundwater. A map with locations of po-
tential environmental concerns will also be provided.
* For further details and applicable assumptions — see 1/31/2017 Kleinfelder,
Inc. proposal (copy attached)
Deliverable(s):
• Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Review Letter Report
Assumption(s):
• Geotechnical and environtnental review will be limited to readily available
existing data. No field explorations or soil testing is included in this task.
9. Environmental Permitting Assessment:
Provide limited review and related efforts to determine and identify potential
environmental documentation and permitting requirements applicable to the project. The
following work elements are included in this task as specifically defined below and in the
subconsultant's proposal.
• Environmental Documentation and Permitting Review—Based on the critical
areas in the proximity of the study area, identify potential environmental
documentation and permitting requirements associated with utility improvements.
Review will include requirements for a Shoreline Permit, SEPA, Critical Areas,
Aquifer Protection Zones,NPDES and other local, state, and federal permits.
Identify jwisdictional extent of agencies, permit application requirements and
potential agency review timelines that will help define the need and schedule for
specific requirements.
• Municipal Code Compliance Review—Review and evaluate applicable
environmental municipal code requirements relative to the proj ect and identify
potential studies or documentation required by the City of Renton Municipal
Code.
• Permitting Matrix and Memorandum—Prepare a permit matrix and memorandum
that identifies potential permit requirements, potential permit timelines and
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Clients�Rentoq City oftDowmown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16\Comract�Exh A-Scope-Downtown Utility Improvemen[s Roject 2-1-17.doc Page 12
summarizes potential key local, state, and federal regulations surrounding the
natural resource permitting process for the project improvements.
* For further details and applicable assumptions — see 1/30/2017 GeoEngi-
neers, Inc. proposal (copy attached)
Deliverable(s):
• Permitting Matrix and Memorandum
10. Cultural Resources Review/Assessment:
Conduct a cultural resources assessment for the project area. The following work
elements are included in this task as specifically defined below and in the subconsultant's
proposal.
• Prepare a brief Cultural Resources Assessment memorandum(CRA) - The CRA
will assess potential for archaeological and historic resources in the study area by
reviewing relevant literature and historic maps, photographs, and plans. The
project plans will be compared to the assessment of archaeological potential, and
to the locations of known historic structures, to determine whether there may be
impacts to cultural and historic resources. These findings and associated
recommendations will be documented in the CRA, which will meet all applicable
state and federal documentation standards for cultural resources reports.
* For further details and applicable assumptions—see 1/10/201'7 Anchor/QEA,
Inc. proposal (copy attached)
Deliverable(s):
• Cultural Resources Assessment Memorandum
11. Coordination with Others:
Provide limited coordination with franchise utilities, other City departments, the City's
roadway design consultant, and other agencies, interested parties or project stakeholders
to understand existing conditions, future improvements, and potential conflicts within the
study area.
• Franchise Utilities—Coordinate with various franchise utilities (i.e. Seattle City
Light, Puget Sound Energy, ComCast Cable, Century Link, Frontier Communica-
tions NVV) with facilities within the vicinity of the project. Contact appropriate
utilities to confirm presence or absence of facilities in the project corridor and ob-
tain pertinent information and record drawings.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\CGents�Rentoq City oflDowMown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16\Co�ract�Euh A-Scope-Dowvtown Utility Impmvements Projec[2-1-17.doc Page 13
• Other City Departments - Coordinate with various other City departments (i.e.
transportation, maintenance division, Community& Economic Development)
with interest in the project.
• City Roadway Design Consultant- Coordinate with the City's roadway design
consultant(if applicable) working on the project.
• Other Agencies, Interested Parties, or Project Stakeholders - Coordinate with oth-
er agencies, interested parties or project stakeholders (i.e. SPU, KC Metro, BNSF,
Boeing, School District) with interest in the project.
12.Sewer System Improvements,Alternatives Analysis:
This task focuses on the evaluation of future built-out sewer system (collection mains and
interceptor conveyance) needs within the defined study area and includes alternatives
development and analysis and working vvith City staff to define a preferred approach to
system design. This task utilizes the results and recommendations of Task 6 along with
proposed plans for redevelopment within the downtown area to develop alternatives and
ultimately a preferred concept for future (built-out) sewer collection and conveyance. The
following work elements are included in this task:
• Develop up to three (3) alternative concepts for improving the City's sewer
collection and conveyance system within the study area. Each alternative will be
developed for consideration relative to City goals and functional requirements.
The conceptual design will be developed to a sufficient level of detail to evaluate
and select a preferred alternative for the project including identifying required
general elements/facilities/features.
• Existing available GIS mapping and data will be used to identify and illustrate the
alternative concepts.
• Provide modeling parameters for city's consultants to model alternatives.
• Relative/qualitative cost (only) and advantages and disadvantages of each
alternative will be evaluated.
• Alternatives will be analyzed, compared, and reviewed with the City taking into
consideration criteria and parameters that have been developed under this scope of
services and are applicable to each alternative. Meet with City to review proposed
alternatives.
• Recommend a preferred alternative considering the conceptual design and
alternatives analysis described above along with other applicable considerations
agreed to with the City.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Clients�Rentoq City ofU)owvtown Utiliry Improvements 2016 9-16\Contract�Exh A-Scope-Dowvtown Utility Impmvements Project 2-1-17.doc Page 14
• The preferred alternative will be refined to include sizing and layout of major
pipelines and facilities.
• Prepare a Basis of Design technical memorandum documenting the results of the
task efforts.
Deliverable(s): �
• Meeting notes ,
• Technical Memorandum i
Assumption(s):
• System (sewer interceptors) modeling and sizing determination/verification
will be provided by the City's hydraulic modeling consultant.
13.Stormwater (Conveyance)System Improvements,Alternatives Analysis:
This task focuses on the evaluation of future build-out stormwater system (trunk pipeline
conveyance only) needs within the defined study area and includes alternatives develop-
ment and analysis and working with City staff to define a preferred design approach for
stormwater system design. This task utilizes the results and recommendations of Task 6
to develop and evaluate alternatives and ultimately recommend a preferred concept for
future (build-out) stormwater conveyance. Work will focus on trunk line conveyance and
exclude roadway drainage (collection facilities), flow control, and water quality treatment
facility analyses. The following work elements are included in this task as specifically de-
fined below and in the subconsultant's proposal.
• Consideration of existing and potential flow routes with respect to downtown im-
provements. It is our understanding the City's preference is to maintain existing
drainage routes and discharge locations. However, if maintaining existing drain-
age routes and discharge locations are not feasible, this task will evaluate options
to reroute flows. Current regulatory requirements related to changes in flow routes
and discharge points will be considered.
• Development of up to four(4) conceptual alternatives for conveyance routing will
be defined and modeled using XPSWMM.
• Conceptual design alternatives to include preliminary system sizing and layout for
the proposed improvements (pipeline conveyance system only). Alternatives will
be considered relative to City goals and functional requirements. The conceptual
design will be performed to a sufficient level of detail to develop and define pro-
ject improvements (including identifying general elements, facilities, and features
required) to deternune constraints related to feasibility,permitting, constructabil-
ity, and other factors.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\ClientsUteuton,City oflDowatown Utility Improvemeuts 2016 9-16�Conhact�Exh A-Scope-Dowrtown Uti1By Improvements Project 2-1-17.doc Page 15
I
• Existing available GIS mapping and data will be used to identify and illustrate the
alternative concepts.
• Relative/qualitative cost (only) and advantages and disadvantages of each alterna-
tive will be evaluated
• Alternatives will be analyzed, compared, and reviewed with the City taking into
consideration criteria and parameters that have been developed under this scope of
services and are applicable to each alternative.
• Preferred alternative recommendation will be made following alternative review
and decision making by the City.
• Preferred alternative conceptual design will include refined sizing and layout of
conveyance system pipelines (only).
• Prepare a Conceptual Stormwater Design Report documenting proposed system
modeling, alternatives development, preferred alternative conceptual design, cost
considerations, permit needs, and recommendations.
• Hold up to two (2) meetings with City personnel to review proposed alternatives
and present the preferred alternative to the City.
* For further details and applicable assumptions — see 1/11/2017 BHC Con-
sultants proposal (copy attached)
Deliverable(s):
• Conceptual Stormwater Design Report
• Meeting notes
14.Downtown Utility(W, S, & SN�Improvements Preferred Alternatives, Conceptual
(1 D%)Design:
Develop a conceptual (10%) level design for the select preferred alternatives for each of
the City's water, sewer, and stromwater system improvements within the study area(s).
The conceptual design/layout will be developed to a sufficient level of detail to illustrate
the preferred improvements for each system including identifying required general
elements/facilities/features, as well as develop a planning-level opinion of probable
construction cost for the project. Existing available GIS mapping and data will be used to
identify and illustrate the project improvements concepts layout/alignment. The following
work elements are also included in this task:
• Proposed improvements - description,project elements, preliminary sizing of
major pipelines/structures (only).
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
7anuary 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\CliemsUtentoq City otlDowntown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16�ContracflExh A-Scope-Downtown Utility I�rovements Project 2-1-17.doc Page 16
• Conceptual-level (10%) design drawings.
• Planning-level opinion of probable construction cost.
• Project phasing and implementation (concepts/feasibility review). ,
• Preliminary project schedule.
Deliverable(s): I
• Conceptual Design Drawings
• Planning-Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
• Preliminary Project Scheduled
Assumption(s):
• Conceptual drawings will include plan drawings only and will represent
preliminary alignment (schematically), sizing and layout of proposed im-
provements. Profiles and details will not be prepared.
15.Phase I Documentation:
A Conceptual Design Report will be prepared to summarize the work, conclusions and
recommendations associated with Phase I efforts. The report will be a stand-alone docu-
ment that will define the project and provide sufficient information and detail to proceed
with continued design development for preliminary design. The body of the report will
include the technical memorandums generated in the previous tasks. Additional pertinent
supporting information for cost estimates, inspection reports,photographs, etc. will be
appended.
Deliverable(s):
• Phase I Conceptual Design Report, draft and final
Assumption(s):
• City staff will review the draft report and provide comments that will be
incorporated into the final report.
16.Public Information and Outreach:
Provide public information and outreach assistance as requested by the City during Phase
I of the project. The following work elements are included in this task as specifically de-
fined below and in the subconsultant's proposal.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 201'7 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Clients�Renton,City oflDowmtown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16�Cortract�Exh A-Scope-Downtown Utilrty ImprovemeMs Projea 2-1-17.doc Page 17
• Prepare Project Stakeholder List- Based on project area research and information
provided by the City, prepare a project stakeholder list and recommended contact
methods.
• Develop Project Information Materials - Develop and design public information
materials, which could include:
o Website content- Prepare content for a project webpage that includes
background information and links to key materials (e.g.,project fact sheet).
Consultant will coordinate with the City's webmaster who will manage the
webpage.
o Project fact sheet- Prepare fact sheet with project overview, schedule, an-
ticipated fieldwork details, and project contact information to post on the
website and to share electronically,by mail, and at in-person events and
meetings.
• Provide Community Outreach Support- Attend existing area meetings and pro-
vide community feedback summaxies. Events could include:
o Attending up to two (2) downtown business and resident meetings. Appro-
priate groups to brief could include, for example, the Renton Downtown
Partnership Board of Directors.
o Attending up to one (1) City public event, as needed.
* For further details and applicable assumptions — see 1/11/2017 EnviroIssues
proposal (copy attached)
Deliverable(s):
• Project stakeholder list, website content, fact sheet, outreach graphics, and
meeting summaries
Assumption(s):
• Participation in meetings and public events is limited to those defined un-
der this task.
17.Phase II(Pre Design) Scope Development:
Prepare for and meet with City personnel to review and discuss the desiredlrequired sub-
sequent phase (Phase II) for pre-design work in support of the project's continued devel-
opment, desired consultant assistance, as well as to develop/verify/refine a scope of work
and budget for the proj ect.
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Ctients�Remoq City oflDowMown Utility Improvements 2016 9-16\Couvac[�Exh A-Scope-Do�wtown Utility Improvements Projec[2-1-17.doc Page 18
Deliverable(s):
• Phase II Scope of Work
5chedule
We understand the importance and need for working closely with you and other City staff to
perform our work efficiently and complete our efforts in a timely manner. We can begin
work upon receipt of a signed contract and notice to proceed, or other agreeable written au-
thorization. With the City's authorization, we will begin our work and proceed in a timely
manner with an anticipated completion of Phase I of the project by no later than July 31,
2017. This schedule is based on timely input and information from City staff and others in-
cluding the collection of requisite information and documentation, staff input, and feedback
regarding draft document(s) or other project matters.
Attachment(s):
• BHC Consultants Proposal (dated 1/11/2017)
• KPG, Inc. Proposal (dated 1/11/2017)
• Kleinfelder, Inc. Proposal (dated 1/31/2017)
• GeoEngineers, Inc. Proposal (dated 1/30/2017)
• Anchor/QEA, Inc. Proposal (dated 1/10/2017)
• EnviroIssues Proposal (dated 1/11/2017)
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvements
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
G:�PDX_BD\Ctirnts�Renton,City oflDownrown Utility Improvemencs 2016 9-16\Contrac[�Exh A-Scope-Dow�rtown Utility Ia�rovemems Project 2-1-17.doc Page 19
EXHIBIT A, CONTINUED
Subconsultant's Scope of Services
City of Renton
Downtown Utility Improvement Project
Phase I: Conceptual Analysis & Design
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvement Project
January 2017 Engineers/Planners Conceptual Analysis&Design
CITY OF RENTON
DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
PHASE I:CONCEPTUAL ANALY515&DESIGN
SCOPE OF WORK—STORMWATER(BHC) ',
January 11,2017 I
Introduction
This scope of services is furnished to MSA for the City of Renton (the City) Downtown Utility
Improvements Project. It represents the engineering and related services to be performed by BHC
Consultants, LLC(BHC)for the evaluation of the existing stormwater system and conceptual design of
the proposed stormwater system within the City-defined study area.
In general,the project is intended to evaluate the existing stormwater system within downtown Renton,
identify deficiencies, and make recommendations for improvements to be implemented to address the
future developed condition. The approximate limits of the study area for stormwater have been defined
with Rainier Avenue South as the western boundary, Mills Avenue South as the eastern boundary, South
Tobin Street as the northern boundary(one block north of South 2"d Street), and South 4th Street as the
southern boundary(one block south of South 3`d Street). The study area also includes the drainage area
to the north of South Tobin Street that contributes to the stormwater outfalls that discharge to the
Cedar River between Logan Avenue South and Wells Avenue South. Approximately one third of the
study area is located within the Lower Cedar River Drainage Basin and the remaining two thirds is
located within the Black River Drainage Basin. The evaluation focuses on trunk conveyance and excludes
roadway drainage (collection facilities),flow control, and water quality treatment facility analyses.
Stormwater analyses are divided into two tasks. Task 6 focuses on the existing system and includes data
review,field reconnaissance, defining regulatory and design requirements, and performing hydraulic
analyses of the existing conveyance system to determine its current level of service. Task 13 includes
evaluating the future built-out stormwater conveyance needs, developing alternatives for stormwater
conveyance,and working with the City to define the preferred alternative to carry forward into the
design phase. The evaluation of the existing stormwater system, development and evaluation of
alternatives,and the proposed stormwater conveyance alternative will be documented in a report
entitled, "Conceptual Stormwater Design Report". We understand it is the City's intent to have the
Conceptual Stormwater Design Report completed in the Summer of 2017.
This proposal is based on our understanding of the City's needs and requirements gained during a
meeting with Murray Smith and Associates(MSA)on December 2, 2016,a meeting with the City and
MSA on December 20, initial review of existing information within the study area, and subsequent
related discussions and input. �
Page 1
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Stormwater Conceptual Analysis& Design I
Task 6—Stormwater(Trunk Conveyance)System Evaluation
This task will include an evaluation of the existing stormwater system within the downtown
improvement area to identify improvements needed for future redevelopment. Work elements for this
task are described in the following subtasks.
6.0 Communications and Invoicin�
This task involves the oversight,technical direction, and communications necessary to facilitate prompt
execution of the work within the agreement schedule and level of effort. The overall scope of work for
stormwater engineering assumes a six-month long task duration, beginning in February 2017 and ending
in August 2017. Communications and invoicing for the project is equally divided between subtasks 6.0
and 13.0. Work elements are listed below.
• Develop, distribute, and update a project work plan to all BHC team members so that
responsibilities and deliverable work products are understood. The plan will include planning of
resource availability to meet the Scope of Work, levels of effort and fee estimates, and schedule
for project deliverables. Assumes at total of 8 hours of time for the project manager and 2
hours for the QA/QC lead.
• Enter project information and documentation within BHCs accounting and management system
for invoicing and tracking purposes. Assumes a total of 1 hour of time for the project manager
and 4 hours of time for the project administrative assistant.
• Generate monthly invoices that summarize work performed during the period and identify
upcoming activities. Assumes 1 hour per month for the project manager and 1 hour per month
for the project administrative assistant.
• Provide ongoing client communications per desired City protocol to support data requests, plan
work activities, and facilitate necessary decision making. Assumes 2 hours per month for the
project manager.
• Participate in one 30-minute-long conference call with the City and design team once every two
weeks. Assumes 1 hour per month for the project manager.
Task 6.0 Deliverables:
• Monthly invoices,including a cover letter describing project progress updates and a budget
summary table.
Task 6.1—Data Collection and Review/Kick-Off Meetin�/Site Visit
The approximate project study area limits are described in the introduction section of this scope of
work. BHC will work with MSA and the City to refine the limits of the study area based on the
approximate limits and prepare a study area map for the stormwater conveyance pipe network,
including upstream and downstream connections.
BHC will collect and review existing available information from the City to further understand, identify,
and define the City's existing stormwater system within the project area. This task will focus on
information related to current operational characteristics related to stormwater conveyance relevant to
the project. Data review will include as-builts, GIS data,AutoCAD files, aerial photography, City of
Page 2
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Stormwater Conceptual Analysis& Design
Renton (COR) Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use map dated July 1,2015,and the following
documents to be provided by the City:
• SW 7`h Street/Hardie Avenue SW/Lake Avenue S Drainage Investigations (RW Beck 1998);
• SW 7th Street Storm Drainage Improvement Project Pre-Design Analysis(Gray&Osborne 2003);
• Flood Insurance Study and HEC-RAS model for the Cedar River(2006);
• Hydrologic and Hydraulic Report, Lake Avenue South Storm System Project(Parametrix 2011);
• Rainier Avenue South Improvement Project—SW Grady Way to S 2"d Street,Surface Water
Technical Information Report(GHD 2011);
• Hardie Avenue SW—SW 7th Street Storm System Improvement Project;Supplemental
Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Report and XPSWMM model—Draft(Louis Berger 2016)
• Main Ave S(S 3�d Street to Mill Avenue S)Construction Plans (KPG 2016); and
• Interior Drainage Review document prepared for Levee Certification (if available).
We understand that presently only limited CCN data are available and the review of study area-wide
CCN data will not be needed for Phase I of this project. If needed to confirm downstream boundary
conditions, it is assumed that the City will conduct isolated CCN field work at downstream connections
within the study area and BHC will review the findings with the City.
It is assumed that a full condition assessment is not needed for Phase I of this project. Phase I will be
used to evaluate pipes and structures that require replacement based on capacity limitations. A full
condition assessment to identify replacement or improvements of conveyance elements with sufficient
capacity, but with structural deficiencies such as brick manhole structures,will be completed under a
separate scope of work at approximately the 30%design level.
A kick-off meeting will be held with City and design team personnel to:
• further understand, identify,and define the City's existing stormwater system and conditions
within the project study area;
• further review and discuss project goals and objectives, understand the requirements of desired
improvements,and review and collaborate on the project work plan; and
• schedule a site visit.
A site visit with City staff will help identify problem areas, site constraints, known environmental
concerns, and help provide an initial overall assessment of the existing stormwater system within the
study area. It witl be particularly helpful to observe the stormwater outfall locations for the purpose of
understanding downstream boundary conditions that will be used in hydraulic modeling, review
upstream project boundaries to understand the potential for surface water flowing into the project
study area, listen to City staff regarding potential challenges related to the existing system,and solicit
input regarding potential opportunities for future improvements and anticipated development. Note, if
it is determined through data review or communications with the City that City staff are not required to
attend the site visit, BHC will conduct the site visit independently.
A technical memorandum will be prepared to summarize the findings of the data review as they relate
to design criteria for the evaluation of the existing conveyance system. The technical memorandum will
describe downstream boundary conditions, upstream areas contributing flow of stormwater into the
Page 3
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Stormwater Conceptual Analysis& Design
study area, land use conditions (future built-out only), potential data gaps,and model input
assumptions. It is understood that some of the data available, including design flows established for
nearby projects, have been developed using the King County Runoff Time Series(KCRTS) program.
These values will be compared to the estimated hydrologic flows for this project with the intent to
establish reasonable boundary conditions for locations both upstream and downstream of the study
area. New hydrology for areas beyond the study area will not be completed for Phase I.
The technical memorandum will be prepared in draft and final format for submittal to the City in
electronic(PDF)format. The final version will be incorporated into the overall Conceptual Stormwater
Design Report as part of Task 13. BHC and the design team will meet with the City to review comments
on the technical memorandum and confirm proposed boundary conditions to be used in the modeling
approach.
Task 6.1 Deliverables:
• Kick-off meeting minutes (draft and final);
• Project study area map (draft and final);
• Data Review Technical Memorandum (draft and final); and
• Boundary Condition Review meeting minutes (draft and final).
Task 6.2—Re�ulatorv Requirements
The regulatory environment related to the existing conditions within the study area will be reviewed
along with standards and requirements for proposed improvements and development. Proposed
improvements are generally assumed to include utility upgrades to stormwater systems only. One land
use condition for both existing and proposed conditions will be use and will be based on the COR
Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use map, effective July 1,2015.
The 2016 COR Amendments to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM)will be used as
criterion for determining the design storm and modeling requirements for the existing and proposed
conveyance system, and to define permit and design documentation requirements.
Other potential design requirements related to the proposed developed condition(s)will be identified,
including but not limited to flow control,water quality, and green stormwater infrastructure based on
current stormwater regulations. This task will include a qualitative assessment of general regulatory
requirements. It is assumed that specific project thresholds for future projects will be handled
independent from this scope of work.
Depending on the condition of the existing stormwater outfalls, some outfalls may need repair, upgrade,
or replacement. These will be identified through input from the City(Task 6.1) and existing conditions
hydrologic and hydraulic modeling (Task 6.3). The regulatory requirements related to potential outfall
maintenance, repair, and replacement will be identified.
Task 6.2 Deliverables:
• The deliverable for this task will be a subsection of the Conceptual Stormwater Design
Report that describes the regulatory setting with respect to stormwater for the project. This
Page 4
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Stormwater Conceptual Analysis& Design
re ort subsection will describe re ulato re uirements related to the existin stormwater I
P g rY q g �
and proposed stormwater conveyance system. This report subsection will be prepared in
draft and final format for submittal to the City in electronic(PDF)format. The final version '
will be incorporated into the overall Conceptual Stormwater Design Report as part of Task
13.
Task 6.3—Existin�Convevance Hydrolo�ic and Hvdraulic Analvsis '
Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling will be performed for the existing conditions within the study area to
identify or evaluate problems identified by the City with the existing storm drainage network and define i
design flow rates for future improvements. �i
The following efforts are proposed for the existing conditions hydrologic and hydraulic modeling within
the study area:
• Review applicable design standards and criteria; project conditions,constraints, and
considerations; and performance or other related requirements for project improvements.
• Develop design criteria for the hydrologic and hydraulic models and system evaluation.
• Define drainage basin limits using GIS and information gathered during Task 6.1.
• Define hydrologic parameters based on land use characteristics related to the stormwater
analysis using the Land Use Zoning dated July 2015 from the COR Comprehensive Plan to
represent full built-out conditions.
• Review available data (GIS, survey, record drawings, reports, and other information gathered
during Task 6.1)and identify potential data gaps within the drainage network. Missing
information will be collected by others in Task 8. If minor gaps in data exist,assumptions will be
used to fill the gaps for the existing conveyance hydraulic model based on industry standards
and observations from the City, MSA, and BHC. If larger data gaps exist,the affected portion of
the existing conveyance model may be postponed until Task 8 data are available. For scoping
purposes, it will be assumed that available data is sufficient for conceptual modeling evaluation
and only minor data gaps are anticipated.
• A Model Development Summary will be prepared to describe the process and methodology
used to build the hydrologic/hydraulic model. The model development summary will describe
the model software and version,assumptions, methods, data sources, input parameters, �
boundary conditions, model calibration,and other pertinent information.
• Perform hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the existing system. Assumptions for hydrologic
and hydraulic analysis include:
o Hydrologic calculations for the conveyance system evaluation will be completed for the
10-, 25-, and 100-year 24-hour storms. It is assumed that the Santa Barbara Unit
Hydrograph (SBUH) methodology will be used to develop peak flows for conveyance
sizing. This is runoff computation method is listed as acceptable on Table 3.2 of the COR '
SWDM.
o It is assumed that water quality or detention facility analyses wilf not be required and
could be added to the scope of work if necessary. These types of facilities would be
analyzed on a case-by-case basis, and therefore,the Western Washington Hydrology
Model (WWHM)would be proposed as the modeling tool for this evaluation.
Page 5
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Stormwater Conceptual Analysis & Design
o XPSWMM is the proposed hydrologic and hydraulic modeling tool for evaluating the
existing conveyance system. XPSWMM was selected because the City is most familiar
with its use and other stormwater evaluations within Renton have been performed
using XPSWMM.
o Downstream boundary condition inputs for XPSWMM will be developed using known
water surface elevations in downstream water bodies (as defined by a FEMA Flood
Insurance Study or USGS data) if available. If insufficient data are available,the
downstream boundary conditions may be estimated based on elevations and backwater
analysis.
o For conveyance, it is assumed that the existing conveyance model will be run for the
10-, 25-,and 100-year 24-hour storms. In accordance with 2017 COR SWDM, both
existing and proposed conveyance storm drains are required to convey the peak flow
from the 25-year, 24-hour storm. Existing and proposed conveyance system will also be
checked for flooding risks that may occur during the 100-year storm.
o Model confirmation will be conducted using known and/or recorded water levels based
on available data. Based on input from the City during the meeting on December 20, it is
understood that there are presently no significant flooding concerns in the downtown
area and there is little water level data available.
o Conveyance elements within the study area will be evaluated and coded based on their
age, material type, condition, ability to convey various design storms, and other criteria
as developed with input from the City.
o Known problems identified during Task 6.1 will be compared with model results to
evaluate the severity of the problem.
• Hydrologic Analysis of the existing conveyance system will be based on the Land Use Zoning
map dated July 1, 2015 presented in the COR Comprehensive Plan.
• Model results including the level of service or capacity of each pipe within the study area will be
presented on a plan map.
• A written summary of existing conveyance deficiencies presented as a subsection of the
Conceptual Stormwater Design Report.
• Up to two(2) meetings with the City and design team will be held to review model development
and results. It is assumed that two(2) representatives from BHC would attend the meetings.
Task 6.3 Deliverables:
• The deliverable for this task will be a subsection of the Conceptual Stormwater Design
Report that describes the existing drainage network, design and evaluation criteria,
hydrologic and hydraulic results, problem areas, proposed improvements. This report
subsection will include the Model Development Summary, as well as describe the current
regulations related to the existing stormwater infrastructure and current regulations
pertinent to future development. It will also include a figure showing the level of service or
capacity of each pipe system in the study area. This report subsection will be prepared in
draft and final format for submittal to the City in electronic(PDF)format. The final version
will be incorporated into the overall Conceptual Stormwater Design Report as part of Task
13.
Page 6
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Stormwater Conceptual Analysis& Design
• Meeting notes (draft and final form).
Task 13—Stormwater(Trunk Conveyance)System Improvements&Alternatives Analysis
This task will utilize the results and recommendations of Task 6 to develop and evaluate alternatives and
recommend a preferred concept for future (built-out) stormwater conveyance. Work will focus on trunk
line conveyance and exclude roadway drainage (collection facilities)design,flow control and water
quality treatment facility analyses. Work elements for this task are described in the following subtasks.
13.0 Communications and Invoicin�
Refer to Task 6.0 for scope and budget assumptions.
Task 13.1—Alternatives Development and Analysis
This subtask will include:
• Consideration of existing and potential flow routes with respect to downtown improvements.
The City's preference is to maintain drainage routes and discharge locations; in other words,
"keep water where it currently goes". If maintaining existing drainage routes and discharge
locations are not feasible,this subtask will evaluate options to reroute flows. This could include
redirecting flows from the Black River to the Cedar River. Current regulatory requirements
related to changes in flow routes and discharge points will be evaluated.
• Development of up to four(4)conceptual (10-15%design level) conveyance system alignments.
• Conceptual design alternatives to include system sizing and layout for the proposed
improvements(pipeline conveyance system only). Up to four conceptual layouts/alignments
will be developed for consideration relative to City goals and functional requirements. The
conceptual design will be performed to a sufficient level of detail to develop and define project
improvements (including identifying general elements and features required)to determine
constraints related to feasibility, permitting, constructability,and other factors.
• Up to four(4)conveyance system alignments will be modeled using XPSWMM. The model will
be developed and run in a similar manner as described in Section 6.3.
• Each alternative will be illustrated on a schematic figure (plan only).
• Relative/qualitative cost and advantages and disadvantages of up to four alternatives will be
evaluated. Detailed cost estimates will not be prepared.
• Alternatives will be analyzed,compared, and reviewed with the City. One meeting with City and
design team personnel is assumed for the review of proposed alternatives. Up to two (2)
representatives from BHC will attend the meeting.
• Preferred alternative recommendation will be made following alternative review and decision
making by the City. �
Task 13.1 Deliverables: �I�
• A subsection of the Conceptual Stormwater Design Report describing the proposed i
alternatives and relative cost advantages and disadvantages. Plan map figures showing up I
to four alternatives for conceptual stormwater conveyance system alignments. This report '
Page 7 I
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Stormwater Conceptual Analysis& Design
subsection will be prepared in draft and final format for submittal to the City in electronic
(PDF)format.
• Meeting notes(draft and final form).
Task 13.2—Preferred Alternative Conceptual Desi�n
• Preferred alternative conceptual design will include refined sizing and layout of major
stormwater conveyance pipelines and manhole structures.
• The XPSWMM model for the preferred conveyance system alignment selected in Task 13.1 will
be revised based on feedback provided by the City in Task 13.1.
• The preferred alternative will be presented on a figure (plan view).
• One review meeting is assumed to present the preferred alternative to the City. Up to two (2)
personnel from BHC are proposed to attend the meeting.
Task 13.2 Deliverables:
• A subsection of the Conceptual Stormwater Design Report describing the preferred
alternative and a plan map that shows the refined conceptual stormwater conveyance
system alignment to be carried forward to the design phase. This report subsection will be
prepared in draft and final format for submittal to the City in electronic(PDF)format.
• Meeting notes (draft and final form).
Task 13.3—Conceptual Stormwater Desi�n Report
Proposed system modeling, alternatives development, preferred alternative conceptual design,cost
considerations, permit needs, and recommendations will be documented in the Conceptual Stormwater
Design Report. The report will be submitted in draft form to the City for review and comment.
Task 13.3 Deliverables:
• The combined overall version of the Conceptual Stormwater Design Report will be prepared
in draft and final format for submittal to the City. One electronic(PDF) and one paper copy
will be provided for both the draft and final version of the report.
Page 8
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Stormwater Conceptual Analysis& Design �
BHC
BUDGET SPREADSHEET
City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase 1: Conceptual Analysis 8 Design
QA/GC PM NodaNnp L�ad ProJaet Eny. CADIGIS ProJ Admin ClerlcalMlP
Tuk No. Task Ducripdon Dom TaUch Hamu Ochilbee/Neier Pierson Siflemian BHC Total Labor Expansq TOTAL COST
Hourl BIIII Rate: E220 5200 5200 E142 5105 5110 S85 Hours Cost
6 Stormwater�Trunk Conveyance)System Ewluation
6.0 Communications and Invoicing 1 17 5 23 54,070 EO 54,070
6.1 Data Collectlon and Review/Kick-off MeeUng/Sfte Visit 1 24 78 26 12 0 2 83 513,742 5150 573,892
Jam m�iecnor and re�iew ti a 8 2 S5(%
Krck-off inee[ing with Ciry b v 2 u��;
Site visit 4 - � �-�-
Technica/memorondum(dra/+ond/�nal� ' .. - �- n �
Meeuny witn G[y ineunaary Condinon Hewew� �- �
6.2 Regulatory Requirements 7 8 12 2 23 53,694 t0 i3,694
63 Existing Conveyance Hydrologic and Hydreulic Analysis 3 58 38 140 40 0 4 287 543,880 5100 yt3,980
�es�qn titantlar�Tsji��[ena < 4 +J
✓rcinage bcsn iimrts using GIS a , & to
Model development&summary � s 7G ?(; ,
Hydrology(SBUHJ&Hydroulics/XPSWMMJ �� �% 5� 7
Level of service mapping based on model results zf 1 r �e
Written subsection of Concep[ual Stormwater Design RepoK � � 4 7 E� -
Fnee[ings wfth City(7; �U � _..�
TASK SUBTOTAL,HOURS 6 105 58 178 52 5 8 410
TASK SUBTOTAL,LABOR COST 51,320 520,900 511,200 525,276 55,460 t550 S�0 565,386 5250 565,636
13 Stormwater(Trunk Conveyance)System Improvements&AltematNes Malysis
13.0 Communications and Invoiting 1 17 5 23 54,070 SO 54,070
13.1 Alternatives Analysis 2 53 22 128 40 0 4 249 338,756 $50 538.206
::evelop 4 e:�teinatn�es�sinng,alignrrrenL Uischaigr IocpUor;,etci&�nop� 16 ti 24 J2
Hydraulic maael�ng(XPSWf✓iMj i; H 72
Relot�ve m5F advontqqes/duavvantaqes ., i6
vvnrten subsertion oj Concepmoi Stormwnrer Des�yn Kepor, _ a - '6 a =
Meetmg with Ciry � � �����
13.2 Preferred Akemative Conceptual Design 0 15 10 24 72 0 0 61 i9,668 i50 E9,718
�lelineAlignmentana�eviscXPSVVMMmovci . �. �+ 'F a
Hevised/finalired plan map{fi9urcl 2 � B d
Meetmg with CitV � � �r��-
13.3 Conceptual Stormwater Design Report(dreft and flnal) 3 10 8 24 12 8 85 59.808 5150 59,758
TASK SUBTOTAL,HOURS 8 95 40 178 64 5 12 398
TASK SUBTOTAL,LABOR COST $1,320 E18,900 ;8,000 524,992 58,720 5550 51,020 j61,502 3250 561,752
TOTAL HOUR8 1Y 799 96 354 118 70 20 807
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR/WD OVER/LLL COST =2,Q40 i38,B00 519,200 550,288 512.780 51.100 57.700 t728.888 5500 5127.388
KPG Survey Scope of Work (1/11/17)
Project Limits
Project limits are within the public rights of way within the study area. The study area for the
purpose of these tasks are: Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern
�boundary), S Tobin Street-one block north of S 2nd Street (northern boundary), and S 4th
Street- one block south of S 3rd Street (southern boundary).
Task 7.1 Survey Control
Establish horizontal and vertical control points within the project limits. The basis of control will
be NAD 83/91 and NAVD88 for horizontal and vertical respectively. A GPS site calibration,
constrained to City or WSDOT published survey control, will be established for the study area.
New control points will be established along S. 2"d St. and S. 3�d St. at a minimum of one at
each intersection between Rainier Avenue S. and Mills Avenue S., estimated to be thirty (30)
points. The new control points will be set intervisibly. They will be a carriage bold driven into a
drilled hole in the sidewalk, or as approved by the City Surveyor. Their horizontal location will be
established by utilizing the GPS site calibration. Their elevations will be established through
digital leveling.
Task 7.2 Sewer Utility Data Collection
Locate sewer manholes as identified by the Engineer. Any combination of GPS, digital leveling
and/or conventional survey techniques may be utilized to obtain accurate horizontal and vertical
location data. Perform measure-downs of existing sanitary sewer structures, indicating rim and
pipe invert elevations. Document the approximate size, type, material, and general condition of
the structures. These observations will be made from the surface. Any required pipe video
inspection, potholing or smoke testing needed to verify the condition or connectivity of drainage
features is outside the scope of this task.
Task 7.3 Stormwater Utility Data Collection
Locate stormwater manholes, catch basins, or outfalls as identified by the Engineer. Any
combination of GPS, digital leveling and/or conventional survey techniques may be utilized to
obtain accurate horizontal and vertical location data. Perform measure-downs of existing storm
drain structures, indicating rim and pipe invert elevations. Document the approximate size, type,
material, and general condition of the structures. These observations will be made from the
surface. Any required pipe video inspection, potholing or smoke testing needed to verify the
condition or connectivity of drainage features is outside the scope of this task.
Deliverables:
A survey base map in AutoCAD Civil 3D format of the project to City of Renton or MSA cad
standards. The scale of the survey drawing shall be as specified by the Engineer. The base
map will include information collected in Tasks 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3 above.
Assumptions:
Two days of survey field work and associated office processing are allocated for task 7.2.
Two days of survey field work and associated office processing are allocated for task 7.3.
If required, Traffic Control Services Inc. will be hired to provide traffic control plans and traffic
control. Two days of traffic control is allocated, including plans preparation, flagging personnel,
all required trucks and equipment and uniformed officer for one day.
Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc.
Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase 1-survey control,sewer and storm data collection
1/i l/2017
Hours Rate Amount
Task'7.1 Survey Control
GPS Site Calibration 8.00 $150.00 $1,200.00
New control points(approximately 30)set and located via GPS 24.00 $150.00 $3,600.00
Digital leveling through new control points 24.00 $150.00 $3,600.00
Office reseazch,coordination and supervision 10.00 $120.00 $1,200.00
Task 7.2 Sewer Utility Data Collection-field 16.00 $150.00 $2,400.00
Sewer Utility Data Collection-office 16.00 $100.00 $1,600.00
Task 7.3 Stormwater Utility Data Collection-field 16.00 $150.00 $2,400.00
Stormwater Utility Data Collection-office 16.00 $100.00 $1,600.00
Expenses:mileage,traffic control $4,500.00
Total $22,100.00
KPG
. ' ``
: KLrEI/VFiELL)ER
�erlQht Propte.Rrqnc sotux3oM.
w�
January 31, 2017
Kleinfelder Proposal No. LOCALMKT.WEOH
Mr. Jeff Kreshel, PE, Principal Engineer
Murray, Smith &Associates, Inc.
601 Union Street, Suite 622
Seattle, WA 98101
SUBJECT: REVISED Proposal for
Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Review ,
Phase I: Conceptual Analysis 8� Design ',
Downtown Utility Improvements Project ',
Renton, Washington
Dear Jeff:
Kleinfelder is pleased to submit this proposal for geotechnical and environmental consulting
services in support of the proposed City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project.
Kleinfelder is committed to providing quality service to Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. (MSA),
and the City of Renton, commensurate with your wants, needs, and desired level of risk. If a
portion of this proposal does not meet your needs, or if those needs have changed, Kleinfelder
stands ready to consider appropriate mod�cations, subject to the standards of care to which we
adhere as professionals. Modifications such as changes in scope, methodology, scheduling, and
contract terms and conditions may result in changes to the risks assumed by the client, as well
as adjustments to our fees.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Our project understanding is based on discussions with yourself and preliminary site plans
provided by Mr. Cheyenne Covington, PE, of MSA in early January 2017. We understand the
City of Renton is planning to reconstruct water, sewer, and stormwater utilities in a portion of the
downtown corridor roughly bounded by South Tobin Street on the north, South 4�' Street on the
south, Rainier Avenue South on the west, and Mill Avenue South and the Cedar River on the
east. The specific project boundaries are currently being evaluated and are expected to vary
somewhat for each utility. This scope of services is based on the project boundaries (Site) as
depicted in general on the attached figure provided by MSA in January 2017, and as further
detailed below.
In general, this work is intended to evaluate the existing water, sewer, and stormwater utility
systems including identifying deficiencies, determining alternatives (if applicable), developing a
conceptual design and making recommendations for system improvements to be implemented to
address the future developed condition within the defined study area of downtown Renton. The
study area focuses on S 2"d Street and S 3'� Street and varies by as defined per the following:
• Water System — Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern
boundary), S 2"d Street (northern boundary), S 3'� Street (southern boundary).
LOCALMKT.WEOH/SEA17P53035_R1 Page 1 of 7 January 16, 2017
�2017 Kleinfelder Revision No. 1,Dated January 31,2017
KLEINFELDER 14710 NE 87th Street,Suite 100,Redmond,WA 98052 p�425.636.7900 f�425.636.7901
• Sewer System — Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern
boundary), S Tobin Street- one block north of S 2"d Street(northern boundary), and S 4tn
Street- one block south of S 3ro Street (southern boundary).
• Stormwater System — Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern
boundary), S Tobin Street - one block north of S 2"d Street (northern boundary), S 4�'
Street-one block south of S 3ro Street(southern boundary), and including several existing
outfalls to the Cedar River.
Replacement, rehabilitation and/or upsizing of the individual utilities are anticipated due to age,
capacity needs, condition, and/or maintenance requirements. S 2"d Street and S 3� Street are
major arterial roadways located within the City's Center powntown area and are lined by a variety
of commercial businesses, Renton High School, and numerous other mixed use properties and
contain several other utilities, both public and private.
The project will be broken into four phases as follows:
• Phase 1 Conceptual Analysis 8� Design: Primarily desktop-level geotechnical and
environmental studies by Kleinfelder.
• Phase 2 Preliminary Design: Anticipated to include geotechnical and environmental field
studies and reporting, and development of 30°/a plans by the project team.
• Phase 3 Final Design: Development of plans and specifications by the project team with
Kleinfelder providing consulting support as well as shoring and dewatering
recommendations and contaminated materials construction management planning.
• Phase 4 Construction Management: This is anticipated to include periodic consulting
and support for submittal and RFI review.
This proposal presents our proposed geotechnical and environmental services for Phase 1-
Desktop level studies.
SCOPE OF WORK
GEOTECHNICAL DESKTOP-LEVEL STUDY
The purpose of Kleinfelder's Phase 1 geotechnical services will be to review readily available
geotechnical, geologic and hydrogeologic data for the project vicinity and provide a preliminary
letter report identifying anticipated soil and groundwater conditions and general geotechnical
recommendations for project design and construction.
Task G1: Collect Existing Geotechnical Data
This task will include the collection of published geologic maps, online geotechnical databases,
in-house consultant reports, and reports available in the City of Renton and King County archives.
We request that the City of Renton personnel provide relevant reports, and/or access to City
archives so that relevant, existing reports or project plans can be reviewed. We also anticipate
searching King County archives for records related to County utilities in the area.
Task G2: Check Available Monitoring Well Water Levels
LOCALMKT.WEOH/SEA17P53035_R1 Page 2 of 7 January 16, 2017
02017 Kleinfelder Revision No.1, Dated January 31,2017
KLEINFELDER 14710 NE 87th Street,Suite 100, Redmond,WA 98052 p�425.636.7900 f�425.636.7901
This task will include identifying monitoring wells registered in WA DOE records that may be
present in public right-of-way. Wells that are safely accessible will be opened and water levels
measured with a well water probe.
Task G3: Review Data and Prepare a Summary Letter Report
This task will include reviewing and summarizing data collected under Tasks G1 and G2. We will
prepare a generalized data summary discussing anticipated soil and groundwater conditions in
the project area. We will provide preliminary comments on geotechnical aspects of project design
and construction based on the information reviewed and anticipated conditions. The results of
our data review and summary will be provided in a letter report, which will be combined with the
report described in Task E3, below.
ENVIRONMENTAL DESKTOP-LEVEL STUDY
,
The purpose of Kleinfelder s Phase 1 environmental services will be to identify known
environmental concerns associated with hazardous materials or petroleum products that may ,
have impacted the Site properties. We will review review readily available environmental records
for the project vicinity and provide a letter report with summary tables and figures identifying areas
of potential environmental concern within the Site boundaries. The purpose of the study is to
identify areas with a high potential to encounter impacted soil and/or groundwater during project
construction that may require special handling and disposal (and therefore impact project I
costs). The results may identify the need for environmental field exploration and testing in later
phases of the project. This information could assist the evaluation of utility improvement
alternatives being considered and be used for impacted materials management planning during
project design and construction.
Task E1: Environmental Database Search and File Review
Kleinfelder will interview knowledgeable City personnel regarding previously identified areas of �
subsurface contamination within the Site area and review readily available state and federal
regulatory agency records of known contaminant releases and regulated facilities that may help
identify environmental concems in connection with the Site. Kleinfelder will contract with
Environmental Data Resources (EDR), a commercial database service, to provide a report of ',
standard environmental record sources, including published lists of federal, state and local regulatory ',
agency lists and/or enforcement actions,for facilities within the Site boundaries and adjacent to the
Site (within 1/8 mile). Additionally, we will review some historical records to develop an overall I
understanding of the site history and environmental concerns. These sources include:
' Environmental Sources
• National Priority List (NPL) sites within 1/8 mile
� CERCLA sites within 1/8 mile
• RCRA TSD sites within 1/8 mile '
• ERNS sites within the corridor �I
• Landfills within 1/8 mile '!
• Leaking underground storage tanks (USTS) within 1/8 mile
• Registered USTS within the corridor or on adjoining properties
• Historic and existing dry cleaners �
LOCALMKT.WEOH/SEA17P53035_R1 Page 3 of 7 January 16, 2017
O 2017 Kleinfelder Revision No. 1,Dated January 31,2017
KLEINFELDER 14710 NE 87th Street,Suite 100, Redmond,WA 98052 p�425.636.7900 f�425.636.7901
• Historic and existing auto service stations
Historica/Sources
• Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
For properties identified on published lists that appear to the have the potential for environmental
impacts, we will review a limited number of regulatory files as available on the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology) web site. For the purposes of the cost estimate, we have
assumed files for eight regulated sites will be reviewed. Only those records available on-line will
be reviewed, grama requests and detailed Ecology file reviews are not included in this scope of
services. If additional facilities require an evaluation of Ecology files, we will provide
recommendations and a cost estimate for the additional work scope. If, after the file review,
additional evaluation, such as borings or test pits, are warranted, we will provide
recommendations and a cost estimate for the additional work scope during the project Phase 2,
Preliminary Design.
Task E2: Conduct Site Reconnaissance
Kleinfelder will perform a Site reconnaissance to obtain information regarding current uses and
apparent environmental concerns of the Site properties. The reconnaissance will include a
walking and driving tour of public access areas and will not include entering private property or
interviewing property owners or tenants. The purpose will be to identify:
• Current uses of Site properties that appear to present an environmental concern,
including visible evidence of treatment, storage, disposal, or generation of hazardous
substances or petroleum products;
• Current uses of directly adjoining properties that appear to present an environmental
concern;
• Storage tanks, odors, pools of liquid, sumps, drums and other containers, if present,
to the extent they are visually or physically observed from public areas at the property
edges.
Task E3: Review Data and Prepare Summary Letter Report
This task will include reviewing and summarizing the information collected under Tasks E1 and
E2. Kleinfelder will prepare a letter report summarizing our research and identifying those areas
with the potential for soil and/or groundwater contamination. The report will include tabulated .
data of Site properties with addresses, regulated facilities/reported releases, Site reconnaissance
findings, and potential for impacts to soil and/or groundwater. We will plot the Sites of
environmental concern on a map that can be overlain on future project design/planning
documents. The report will be issued in combination with the report described in Task G3, above.
FEE
We propose to perform the above detailed scope of services based on our standard 2017 rates
on a time and materials basis not to exceed a total fee of�21,237. A breakdown of our proposed
fee is presented below.
LOCALMKT.WEOH/SEA17P53035_R1 Page 4 of 7 January 16, 2017
OO 2017 Kleinfelder Revision No.1,Dated January 31,2017
KLEINFELDER 14710 NE 87th Street,Suite 100, Redmond,WA 98052 p�425.636.7900 f�425.636.7901
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
Task G1: Collect Existing Data �',
Kleinfelder Labor $ 2,776 '
Kleinfelder Mileage and Expenses $ 42 '�,
Task G1 Total $ 2,818 '
Task G2: Check Available Monitoring Well Water Levels
Kleinfelder Labor $ 977
Kleinfelder Mileage and Expenses $ 27
Task G2 Total $ 1,004
Task G3: Data Review and Summary Letter Report
Kleinfelder Labor $ 6,735
Task 3 Total $ 6,735
Geotechnical Phase 1 Total $ 10,557
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Task E1: Environmental Records and File Review
Kleinfelder Labor $ 4,550
Kleinfelder Mileage and Expenses $ 400
Task E1 Total $ 4,950
Task E2: Site Reconnaissance
Kleinfelder Labor $ 1,702
Kleinfelder Mileaqe and Expenses $ 53
Task E2 Total $ 1,755
Task E3: Data Review and Summary Letter Report
Kleinfelder Labor $ 3.975
Task E3 Total $ 3,975
Environmental Phase 1 Total $ 10,680
PROJECT TOTAL �21,237
This fee does not inctude costs associated with construction observation, testing or engineering
consultation during construction, review of project plans and specifications, or additional work
requested by reviewing authorities. It is also possible that the information obtained in the field
during this investigation will require more detailed analysis than we currently anticipate.
Kleinfelder would be pleased to provide such additional services, upon request.
LOCALMKT.WEOH/SEA17P53035_R1 Page 5 of 7 January 16, 2017
�2017 Kleinfelder Revision No. 1,Dated January 31,2017
KLEINFELDER 14710 NE 87th Street,Suite 100,Redmond,WA 98052 p�425.636.7900 f�425.636.7901
SCHEDULE
We are prepared to begin work within two business days of receiving a signed contract. We
anticipate completing our geotechnical and environmental site reviews and letter report four to
five weeks after receiving access to City archives.
ASSUMPTIONS
Based on information available during our preparation of this proposal the following assumptions
apply:
Geotechnical Studv Assumptions
• Available historical information will be provided by the City of Renton or access to archives
will be provided;
• Geotechnical review will be limited to readily available existing data; archive review is
anticipated to require 1.5 days or less.
• No field exploration or soil testing included in this task.
• Recommendations for field testing would be developed as part of scoping under project
Phase 2.
Environmental Studv Assumptions
• Environmental records review will be limited to readily available files provided by EDR and
up to eight release site files available on Ecology's file search web site.
• The Site reconnaissance can be completed in 10 hours, including travel. A walking and
driving tour of the Site area will be conducted from public access areas. No detailed
property or building inspections will be conducted, and no property owners will be
interviewed.
• Kleinfelder does not guarantee the accuracy of information supplied by its sources, but
reserves the right to rely on this information in formulating a professional opinion regarding
the potential for subsurface contamination at the Site.
• No field exploration, soil/groundwater sampling or lab analysis are included in this task.
• Recommendations for field testing would be developed as part of scoping under project
Phase 2.
LIMITATIONS
This proposal specifically excludes the assessment of environmental characteristics (particularly
those involving hazardous substances such as lead, asbestos, pesticides, herbicides,
petrochemicals and others substances at the site).
Although risk can never be eliminated, more detailed and extensive investigations yield more
information, which may help understand and manage the degree of risk. Since such detailed
services involve greater expense, our clients participate in determining the level of service that
provides adequate information for their purposes at acceptable levels of risk. Kleinfelder will
perform its services in a manner consistent with the standards of care and skill ordinarily exercised
LOCALMKT.WEOH/SEA17P53035_R1 Page 6 of 7 January 16, 2017
O 2017 Kleinfelder Revision No.1,Dated January 31,2017
KLEINFELDER 14710 NE 87th Street,Suite 100,Redmond,WA 98052 p�425.636.7900 f�425.636.7901
by members of the profession practicing under similar conditions in the geographic vicinity and at
the time the services will be perFormed. No warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is part
of the services offered by this proposal.
CLOSURE
We understand that a formal contract will be sent to us containing the agreed upon scope of
services and budget. ,
If you have any questions regarding the contents of this scope of services and budget or require
additional information, please call me at (425) 636-7900.
Sincerely,
KLEINFELDER
�'i�--._ - ����(/ai-�1j
� .
Corinne Hillard, PG Chad R. Lukkarila, PE
Senior Environmental Project Manager Principal Geotechnical Engineer
Project Manager
Marcus B. Byers, PE
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
Attachments: Kleinfelder 2017 Fee Schedule
Map of Study Area
LOCALMKT.WEOH/SEA17P53035_R1 Page 7 of 7 January 16, 2017
�O 2017 Kleinfelder Revision No. 1,Dated January 31,2017
KLEINFELDER 14710 NE 87th Street,Suite 100,Redmond,WA 98052 p�425.636.7900 f�425.636.7901
�
SCOPE OF SERVICES
RENTON DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION,AND PERMITTING COMPLIANCE
RENTON,WASHINGTON
GEOENGINEERS FILE N0.0231-091-00
INTRODUCTION
GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) is pleased to present our proposal for environmental permitting
assistance for Phase 1 of the City of Renton Downtown Utility Improvement project in Renton,Washington.
This is the initial phase of the project that will re-establish two-way traffic along S 2^d and S 3�d streets in
downtown Renton. This proposal includes our scope and fee estimate related to the potential
environmental permits that may be potentially required for work conducted adjacent to and within the
Cedar River. This scope of work is based on a conversation with and email from Jeff Kreshner on January
10 and 27, 2017.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
In general, this overall project is intended to evaluate the existing water, sewer, and stormwater utility
systems including identifying deficiencies,determining alternatives(if applicable),developing a conceptual
design and making recommendations for system improvements to be implemented to address the future
developed condition within the defined study area of downtown Renton.The study area focuses on S 2^a
Street and S 3�d Street and varies by as defined per the following:
■ Water System - Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern boundary), S 2�d
Street(northern boundary),S 3�d Street(southern boundary).
■ Sewer System - Rainier Avenue S(western boundary), Mills Avenue S(eastern boundary),S Tobin
Street-one block north of S 2�d Street(northern boundary),and S 4th Street-one block south of S
3�d Street(southern boundary).
■ Stormwater System - Rainier Avenue S (western boundary), Mills Avenue S (eastern boundary), S
Tobin Street-one block north of S 2^d Street(northern boundary),S 4th Street-one block south of
S 3�d Street(southern boundary), and including several existing outfalls to the Cedar River.
Replacement, rehabilitation and/or upsizing of the individual utilities are anticipated due to age, capacity
needs, condition and/or maintenance requirements. S 2^d Street and S 3�d Street are major arterial
roadways located within the City's Center powntown area and are lined by a variety of commercial
businesses, Renton High School, and numerous other mixed use properties and contain several other
utilities, both public and private.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 - Environmental Permitting Assessment
This task will include limited review of information prepared by the design team including conceptual plans
illustrating the location of utility upgrades and existing environmental documentation within the project
corridor. We assume no new studies or field reconnaissance will be required as part of this scope of work.
Specifically,we will perform the following tasks:
■ Environmental Documentation and Permitting Review- Based on the critical areas in the proximity
of the study area, we will identify potential environmental documentation and permitting
requirements associated with proposed utility improvements. Our review will include requirements
for a Shoreline Permit,SEPA,Critical Areas,Aquifer Protection Zones, NDPES and other local,state
. and federal permits. We will identify jurisdictional extent of agencies, permit application
requirements and potential agency review timelines that will help define the need and schedule for
specific requirements.
■ Municipal Code Compliance Review - Review and evaluate applicable environmental municipal !�
code requirements relative to the project and identify potential studies or documentation required ''i
by the City of Renton Municipal Code.
■ Permitting Matrix and Memorandum - We will prepare a permit matrix and memorandum that
identifies potential permit requirements, potential permit timelines and summarizes potential key
local, state, and federal regulations surrounding the natural resource permitting process for the
proposed conceptual project improvements.
■ Design Team Meetings: We assume we will attend two design team meetings to discuss design
details and potential impacts to permitting related to the proposed utility layout.
DELIVERABLE(S):
■ Permitting Matrix and Memorandum
GEOENGINEERS FEE ESTIMATE
Job Numb�r 0231-091-00 �on Ham.: Rsnton Downtown UUI Im ovem�rns own.r. C of Rerkon
Cn.� Murn ,Smkh and Associates Pnpand: Jw Callayhan
BIIIing Rates 5215 $215 $215 5185 $145 $128 5111 $168 $109 5&4 873
Associate Senior Sta8111 SfaH II
Assodate Assodate Geotechnlcal Engineed Englneer/ Engineer/ StaRl GIS CAD Expenses and Total Total
Taak Task Dascriptlon Biologist Hydrdogist Engineer Bidogist Sdentlat Sdentist Engineer Malyst Designer Admin 2 Admin 1 Direct Cos4s Hours Labor Total Cost
1 Environm�rMal Pertnittin Assessme�t
Environmental Documentafion and Pertnit Review 2 4 270 6 51,170 51,440
Municipal Code Compliance Review 2 4 70 6 t1,17o 51,240
Pertnit Madrx and Memaandum 4 12 185 16 f3,080 33,265
Design Team Meedngs(2 meetings) 4 4 2 106 io St,�ss 51,8�4
Pro'ect Mana ement,Invoicin ,and Miscellaneous CommunicaGon 1 2 1 40 4 E669 5709
TotalLabor 13 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 671 42 $7,857 =8,528
Total Fee Estimate ;8,528
�20 olive way,suite�900 1 � �CHOR
' ! s � Seattle,Washington 98101 I �,/ QEA c.�
206.287.9130 �-�►
Memorandum January 10, zo��
To: Jeff Kreshei, Murray, Smith and Associates, Inc.
From: Barbara Bundy,Anchor QEA, LLC
cc: Derek Koellmann,Anchor QEA, LLC
Re: Scope of Work and Budget for Cultural Resources Assessment, Renton Downtown
Utility Improvements Project
Thank you for contacting Anchor QEA, LLC, regarding the Renton Downtown Utility Improvements
Project(Project).We understand that you require a scope of work and budget for a Cultural
Resources Assessment(CRA)for a Phase 1 environmental review of the Project.
It is our understanding that the Phase 1 review is intended to identify and evaluate alternatives for
upgrading the existing water, sewer, and stormwater utility systems in downtown Renton.The study
area is approximately 140 acres and is bounded by Rainier Avenue South to the west, Mills Avenue to
the east, South Tobin Street to the north, and South 4th Street to the south. Proposed Project work
will likely include a mix of replacement, rehabilitation, and upsizing of existing water, sewer,and
stormwater infrastructure.
The Project is locally funded,and will be required to comply with the Washington State Environmental
Policy Act(SEPA).It is possible that a U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit may be required
for the Project and, if so, USACE would be required to comply with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act.The CRA would assist with SEPA and Section 106 compliance by:
• Identifying potential for archaeological, historic, and cultural resources in the study area
• Recommending methods to avoid impacts to archaeological, historic, and cultural resources,
where possible x
Scope of Work
We will prepare a CRA that will assess potential for archaeological and historic resources in the study
area by reviewing relevant literature, soils information, historic maps, and photographs.The
alternatives will be compared to the assessment of archaeological potential, and to the locations of
known historic structures,to determine whether there may be impacts to cultural and historic
resources.These findings and associated recommendations will be documented in the CRA,which
will meet all applicable state and federal documentation standards for cultural resources reports.
�e; r � u .�' January 10,2017 �
_ Page 2
Assumptions
• No fieldwork will be required;the CRA is a desktop study
• No tribal or agency consultation will be conducted
• Deliverables will be in electronic format(PDF and Word); no hard copies will be required
• Murray, Smith, and Associates,Inc.,will provide one round of review of the Draft CRA and
provide a single set of consolidated comments; no additional rounds of review will be
required
Deliverables
• Draft and Final CRA
Budget
The anticipated budget for this scope of work (single task) is $3,364, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Proposed Budget
Staff Hours Total
Principal 3 $729
Senior Archaeologist 12 $2,124
Technical Editor 4 $412
Project Coordinator 1 $99
Tota! $3,364
Schedule
The following schedule is anticipated:
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5
� .
Draft CRA delivered 3 weeks after NTP. Final CRA delivered 1 week after receipt of comments from
Murray, Smith and Associates,Inc.Total estimated duration is 5 weeks.
Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Scope of Services,Jan. li,2017
Project Overview and Background
In general,this work is intended to evaluate the existing water,sewer,and stormwater utility systems
including identifying deficiencies, determining alternatives(if applicable),developing a conceptual
design and making recommendations for system improvements to be implemented to address the
future developed condition within the defined study area of downtown Renton.The study area focuses
on S 2"d Street and 5 3'd Street and varies as defined per the following:
• Water System—Rainier Avenue 5(western boundary), Mills Avenue 5(eastern boundary),S 2nd
Street(northern boundary),S 3�d Street(southern boundary).
• Sewer System—Rainier Avenue 5(western boundary), Mills Avenue 5(eastern boundary),5
Tobin Street-one block north of 5 2"d Street(northern boundary), and S 4th Street-one block
south of S 3`d Street(southern boundary).
� Stormwater System—Rainier Avenue S(western boundary), Mills Avenue 5(eastern boundary),
S Tobin Street-one block north of S 2"d Street(northern boundary), 5 4th Street-one block
south of S 3'd Street(southern boundary),and including several existing outfalls to the Cedar
River.
Replacing, rehabilitating, and/or upsizing the individual utilities are anticipated due to age,capacity
needs,condition and/or maintenance requirements.S 2"d Street and 5 3�d Street are major arterial
roadways located within the City's Center powntown area and are lined by a variety of commercial
businesses, Renton High School, and numerous other mixed use properties and contain several other
utilities, both public and private.
Phase 1 Duration
The first phase of this project is expected to last approximately 6 months,from February through July
2017.
Task 1 Public Information and Outreach
Purpose: Provide public information and outreach assistance as requested by the City during Phase I of
the project.
• Prepare Project Stakeholder List: Based on project area research and information provided by
the City, prepare a project stakeholder list and recommended contact methods.
• Develop Project Information Materials. Develop and design public information materials,which
could include:
o Website content: Prepare content for a project webpage that includes background
information and links to key materials (e.g., project fact sheet). Consultant will
coordinate with the City's webmaster who will manage the webpage.
Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project Jan. 11,2017
Public Outreach Scope—Envirolssues Page 1
o Project fact sheet: Prepare fact sheet with project overview,schedule,anticipated
fieldwork details,and project contact information to post on the website and to share
electronically, by mail, and at in-person events and meetings.
• Provide Community Outreach Support. Attend existing area meetings and provide community
feedback summaries. Events could include:
o Attending up to two(2)downtown business and resident meetings.Appropriate groups
to brief could include,for example,the Renton Downtown Partnership Board of
Directors.
o Attending up to one (1) City public event, as needed.
• Prepare Monthly Progress Reports and Invoices. Prepare and submit progress reports and monthly
invoices showing activities completed, budget, and schedule status,and identifying key issues.
Deliverable(sJ:
• Project stakeholder list
• Project website content and one update
• Project fact sheet
• Project outreach graphics to include in materials(up to twoj
• Community meeting public input summaries
• Monthly progress reports/invoices
Assumption(s):
• Participation in meetings and public events is limited to those defined under this
task. Consultant participation will include attending existing meetings and preparing a brief
public input summary after each event. City or other team member(s)will make the
presentation.
• City webmaster will format and populate project website with content and graphics provided by
Consultant.
• Draft deliverables will be provided for up to two rounds of City review prior to finalization.
• City will be responsible for reproducing and distributing project materials.
Renton Downtown Utility Improvements Project Jan. 11,2017
Public Outreach Scope—Envirolssues Page 2
Renton Downtown Utilities Improvements Project
Phase I Cost Estimate-Envirolssues
Jan.11,2017
Staff Seinor Assoc./ Assoc.1 Proj.Coord. Graphics
PM I ! ���
Billing Rate $152.31 $95.57 $74.66 $92.58
TOTAL HOURS 6 30 11 2 49
TOTAL LABOR COST $913.86 $2,867.10 $821.26 $185.16 $4,787.38
TOTAL DIRECT COST $171.50
TOTAL $4,958.88
Task i Public Information and Outreach
Total Hours 6 30 11 2 49
Total Labor $913.86 $2,867.10 $821.26 $185.16 $4,787.38
Direct Costs
i Item Quantity Cost Each sTotal Item Cost
_- ----- ���. ____
_--
i Black and white copies 200 $0.10 $20.00
.__. .. . _,
�---- $0 89 -- -- $44.50
�Color copies 50'
�Mileage �� 200 $0.54 $107.00
TOTAL DIRECT COST i $171.50
EXHIBIT B
TIME SCHEDULE OF COMPLETION
City of Renton
Downtown Utility Improvements Project
Phase I: Conceptual Analysis & Design
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATED SCHEDULE
MSA shall begin work immediately upon receipt of Notice to Proceed from the City and proceed
according to the preliminary estimated schedule presented below. However, the schedule may
change due to factors beyond MSA's control, such as additional time required for permitting,
public outreach, etc.
Preliminary Design Tasks Estimated Completion
Notice to Proceed February 2017
Task 1 — Proj ect Management February—July 2017
Task 2— Communication/Coordination/Meetings February—7uly 2017
Task 3— General Information Collection&Review February—March 2017
Task 4— Water System Improvements March—June 2017
Task 5— Sewer System Evaluation March—May 2017
Task 6— Stormwater(Conveyance)System Evaluation March—May 2017
Task 7— Survey Control and Data Collection March—May 2017
Task 8— Preliminary Geotechnical&Environmental Review April—May 2017
Task 9— Environmental Permitting Assessment April—May 2017
Task 10— Cultural Resources Review/Assessment April—May 2017
Task 11 — Coordination with Others April—June 2017
Task 12— Sewer System Improvements,Alternatives Analysis May—June 2017
Task 13— Stormwater(Conveyance) System Improvements, May—June 2017
Alternatives Analysis
Task 14— Downtown Urility Improvements Preferred June—July 2017
Alternatives,Conceptual(10/o)Design
Task 15— Phase I Documentation June—July 2017
Task 16— Public Information and Outreach April—July 2017
Task 17— Phase II(Pre-Design) Scope Development July—August 2017
*All engineering services to be completed by Contract Completion Date: January 31,2018
City of Renton MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC. Downtown Utility Improvement Project
January 2017 Engineers/Planner Conceptual Analysis&Design
, Page 1
� EXHIBIT C
CITY OF RENTON
DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
PHASE I:CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS$DESIGN
PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE
Hours and Costs ubeonsuMant Fus s�s Discf iln�Bnakdovm
Prinelpal Prindpal Profes:ional Prohsslonal Enginwrinp Tachnician Adminis4ativa MSA Mehorl BHC Subeonsultant Mlleape GIS P�ntlng, Total
Task Enyinwr V Enpinwr N Englnwr VII Enpinwr V Desiynor N il 1 MSA Labw Hows pEA ConsuMants Envirolssuas GwEnpinNrs Klbnf�W�r �(pG Fw Total Other Ezpenses Total Fw WaUr Sewer Storm
Task 1- Pro ad Mana amarrt
o Projed Status RepoRs 6 S 423 6 S - S S S 20 5 20 51,442 S 481 S 481 E 481
o Staft and Subconsultant Mana ement 2 40 18 72 S 3,961 70 S - S S S 20 5 20 E13,324 S 4,441 S 4,441 S 4,441
o Invoices and Budget Oversight 10 6 S 805 18 S - S $ S 5� S 50 52.753 S 918 $ 918 S 918
o Project Schedule 2 4 8 = 527 12 S - S S S 20 5 20 $1,789 $ 598 E 598 S 598
o �ualityAssurance/QualityControl 16 S 1,274 16 S - S S S 20 S 20 $4,299 $ 1,433 S 1,433 E 1,433
Task 1 Subtohl 7B 5! 20 0 E 0 78 S 6,990 120 s - i - f - i • S - f • f - t i f 7a0 S �� f �� S 7 B89 t 7 S 7,l89 *
Task 2- CommunlcatioNCoo►dinatloNMNtl s
2.0 JaM Utilitles Meetin a U to 4 4 24 32 E 3,574 60 E - 3 140 a a �1 E 220 512,224 E 4,075 S 4,075 S 4,075
2.1 Water Utili C/C 8 14 E 1,128 22 S - S a a 10 E 10 53,800 53,800
2.2 Sewer Utili C/C 18 28 E 2,398 46 S - E S S 10 S 10 $8,063 58,063
2.3 StortrrvvaterUGli C/C 20 40 E 3,364 60 S - S S S 10 S 70 511.308 511,308
TukYSubMhl 4 70 72 42 0 0 0 : 70,I64 16B j • f - i - f - i - t - f - i 1�0 t f 710 t 250 i 35,585 f 7874 f 7 7S! : 15,382
Task 3- Garwral IMormation CollaeUon 6 Ravlaw 6 14 24 8 S 2,125 52 S - S S .80 5 40 S 120 57.257 S 2,419 S 2,419 S 2,419
Task 3 Subtohl 0 8 11 0 24 8 0 s 2,725 52 : - i - S - S • i - f • i - S f 80 S 4U S 72U f 7,257 i Y,41Y ; 2 19 f 79
Task 4- Watar S tem Im rovamarrts
o Data CollectioNKidc-off Meeting/Site Visit 10 22 24 4 E 2,481 60 S - S 70 S 40 $ 40 S 150 y8,484 S8,484
o E�dsting System Review 2 12 18 8 E 1,452 40 S - E S 80 S 10 S � 54.967 54,967
o IdenUficatlon of Water System ImprovemeMs �
-Recartxnendation and Figures 6 16 26 18 S 2,470 66 S - E S 180 S 50 S 230 E8.526 58,526
-Coordination with SPU 2 6 S 271 8 S - S S S 3 5910 5910
-Review Meetings(up to 2) 8 12 E 1,048 20 S - 3 70 S S 40 § 110 $3,629 53,629
-Technical Merta 2 2 6 8 4 2 S 957 24 S - S S 40 S � S � 53,305 $3,305
T�sk1 ubtoW 2 2t 0 70 62 34 2 f l,679 21t f • S - t - S - � • f - f • f 710 f ]40 f 190 f !70 � 2Y.820 S 2l620 S f
Task 5- Sowor S am Evaluation
o Data Colledion/IGdc-off MeetinglSite Ysil 10 22 24 4 i 2,481 60 S - S 70 S 40 S 40 S 150 58,484 S8,4B4
o Syatem Malysis
-Malysis and Identificadon of Defiaencies 12 34 60 8 E 4,376 114 S - S S 80 S 20 S 100 b14,799 E14,799
-Info.for Modeling Consultarrt 2 6 E 383 8 S - S s a - a 51,285 51,285
-Review MeeGngs(up to 3) 12 18 S 1,572 30 E - S 105 S S � S 165 35,444 55,444
-Technical Memo 2 2 4 8 4 2 S 877 22 E - S S 40 E 50 S 80 E3,034 53,034
Task 5 Subtohl 2 3! 0 !4 92 18 2 = 9 i!B Z�I S - S • S - S - f - f - t - S 775 i 160 t 770 S SOS f 37,048 i i � f
Taak 6- SWrtnwater Come anu tem EvaluaUon S 72,200 E 72,200 E S E S 572,200 572.200
o Data ColleclioMGdc-o1f Meeting/Site Visit 72 26 6 2 S 2,370 46 S - S 70 S 20 S 40 S 130 58,091 58,091
o Regulatory Requirements 4 10 i 770 14 S - 3 S - S S 52,587 52.587
6dsting Conveyance Hydrologic and Hydraulic
o Malysis
-Malysis 18 50 S 3,710 68 E - S S - S 10 $ 10 512,473 512.473
-Review Mee6ngs(up to 3) 12 7B E 1,725 30 S - S 105 S - S 60 S 165 55.960 55,960
-Technical Merta 2 4 6 S 734 12 S - S S S 50 S 50 52,517 32.517
TaskASubMhl 2 SO 110 0 E 2 0 S 9,811 170 { - f 72,200 f - t - � • i - i 72,200 S 175 i ZO S 180 S 3S5 f 703,827 S f f 709,a27
Task 7- Sum CoMrol and Date Collecflon S 24,310 S 24,310 a a S $ 324,310 S 8,103 S 8,703 $ 8,103
7.1 Survey Control Establishment 2 4 4 S 465 10 E - S - $ 40 S 40 $ 80 51.641 S 547 S 547 $ 547
7.2 Sewer Utilily Date Cdlection 1 4 4 4 S 521 13 a - a - s 40 S 20 5 60 E1,810 S 603 S 603 E 603
7.3 Stommater Utiliry Data Collection 1 4 4 4 S 521 13 S - E - S 40 S 20 S 60 51,810 3 603 E 603 E 603
Task7SubMhl 0 4 12 0 ! 12 0 f 7,507 �6 f - _ - i - f - f - i ?A.310 f 2�,370 f t 120 S !0 f Z00 S 29.570 i 8,657 i 9,857 t 9,l57
Task 8- Prelimina Geotechnlcal 8 Environmental Revlew 4 8 E 673 12 $ 23,361 S 23,361 a s - a a - a2s,s2o 3 8,540 3 8,540 S 8,540
Tesk 8 Subtohl 0 4 ! 0 0 0 0 t 873 12 t - S - f - f - i 23,361 S - i 29.381 f i i f f 25,620 i 6,540 : B,SW i 8,'.FW
Task 9- Environme�rtal Pormktln AssesameM 6 12 E 1,009 18 S 9,381 S 9,381 a S - S a - a+z,770 5 4 257 S 4 257 S 4 257
Task a Subtota/ 0 6 12 0 0 0 0 S 1,009 1! S • i - t • t Y,387 f • f • f Y.381 i t S i f 12,770 = 4,257 : 4,257 f 4,257
Task 10- Cukural Resources Revlew/Assesament 2 4 E 336 6 S 3,700 S 3,700 a a - a S - 54,830 S 1,610 3 1,610 S 1,610
Tqk f0 Su6Mh1 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 f 338 S S 3,700 f - f - i - i - ; - i 3,700 i f i f f 4,830 i 7 E70 f 1,810 S 7,670
Task 11- Coordinatlon wkh Others
o Frenchise Utilities 4 14 18 2 2 S 1,451 38 S - S E 20 S 40 $ 80 54,933 5 1,844 S 1,644 5 1,844
o Other City Departrnents 4 8 8 S 858 20 S - S S - S 10 S 10 52,893 S 964 S 964 E 984
o City Roadway Design Consultant 4 8 2 S 669 14 a a S 20 S 20 S 40 52,285 S 762 S 762 S 782
Other Agencies,Interested Parties or ProJect
o Stakeholders 4 14 16 2 2 E 1,451 38 S - E - S 20 S 20 S 40 54,913 S 1,638 E 1,638 S 1,638
Tuk11 SubMbl 0 16 0 14 40 6 4 S 4,428 110 S - S - � - i - f - f - S - i i � S 90 � 1S0 = 15,024 S 6.008 i S,OOs S 5,00!
Task 72- Sewer S stem Im rov�menb,Altematives Anal Is
o Develop Altemetives 8 18 40 18 S 2,850 78 S - S - S 780 S 40 S 200 $9,772 59,772
a Provide Modeling Peremeters 1 2 E 151 3 S S S - S - S $508 5508
a Malyze and ReviewAltemetives 4 72 24 S 1,527 40 S - S S - S 2� S 20 35,149 55,149
o Prefened AltemaUva RecommendaUons 2 8 12 S 844 22 E E $ E 20 S 20 E2,855 52.855
o Prepare Basis of Design Memorendum 2 2 4 8 4 2 f 877 22 S 5 S 40 S 50 S 90 53,034 53,034
o Revlew Meetlng(Up to 1) 4 6 E 524 10 S - S 35 $ - S 20 $ 55 5�.815 51,815
Tuk fY Subtohl 2 19 0 48 84 20 2 t 8,772 175 f • S - i - i - f • f • i - i �3' i Z00 t 1'30 = �5 f 2S,7S2 t S 28.192 S
Tuk 13- s�ormwate�(Convayance)System Improvemerns, S 67,927 3 67,927 E - S - S -
Albmative Mal It $ E67 927 567,927
o Develop Altematives 12 32 S 2,409 44 S - S $ - S E 58,090 58,090
o Melyze and ReNew Altematives 14 34 E 2,647 48 S - E 3 S S E8,892 58,892
o Preferred Altemative RecommendaUons 4 12 E 888 18 S - S $ S S 52,915 52,915
o Prepere Basis of Design Memorandum 2 6 12 E 1,168 20 S S $ $ 40 $ 40 53,964 $3,964
o Review Meeting(Up to 2) B 12 E 1,150 20 E - S 70 $ $ 40 S 110 53,973 53,973
T�str 17 Su6fob/ 2 44 102 0 0 0 0 i 8,242 118 S - : i7.927 S • t - t • f - f d7,YY7 i 70 f i !0 i 750 S 95.767 : { S 95,761
qh,d Ren�on MURRAY.EMRH i A6SOCIATEE,NIC. Downtown UtlIHy Improvement Pmject
January 2017 EngineerolPlennen Coneeplual Maysis 6 Dealpn
o:wox erncwuverwm.ar onoow�own wry wnpo..m«►a swe aie�caa.a�,n c-F«ea-oowMown wry ima�«w vm�.a s-�-n . Pege 7
EXHIBIT C
CITY OF RENTON
DOWNTOWN UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
PHASE I:CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS&DESIGN
PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE
MSA Labw Hours and Costs SubeonsuMant Ns nsa� Disei Iln� nekdown
Prineipal PAneipal Professional Professional EnQlneeriny Teehnlelan Administrative MSA Mehorl BHC Subconsultant Milwya GIS P�OGO�� Total
Task Enyinwr V Enpinaer IV Enpinaer VII Enpinwr V DesiQn�r M IN I MSA Labor Hours QEA Consultarhs Envirolssues GeoEnpineers Klienfelder �(pG Fw Total Othar E:penses Tofal Fae Water S�w�r Storm
Taak 14. DowrHown Utllity ImprovemaMs Pr�f�md
Altamativas Conca ual 70h Wsi n
o Concept-level Design Drawings 2 40 32 28 120 80 S 12,045 302 $ - 3 S 800 S 250 S 1.050 541,505 � 13,835 $ 13,835 S 13,835
Planning-level Opinion of Probably Coets 2 8 8 b 717 18 S S S S 20 $ 20 $2,429 $ 810 S 870 E 810
o Projed Phasing and Implementadon Review 8 8 E 955 16 S S § S 10 $ 10 j3,218 $ 7,073 S 1,073 S 1,073
o Preliminary Projed Schedule 2 4 6 S 527 12 E - 3 S E 20 S 20 E7,789 S 596 $ 596 $ 596
Tuk 1�Su6tod/ 2 SZ 4l �8 134 ' 80 0 S 14,243 918 S - i - { - i • i • i - i - i f � i 300 i 7,100 = 48,940 S 16,373 = 78,313 ; 16,377
Task 15- Phasa 1 Doeumantatlon 4 8 12 16 24 16 8 S 3,519 88 � - $ S 160 $ 400 � 560 $12,381 3 4,127 3 4,127 S 4,127
Task 13 SubMhl 4 8 1� 18 21 16 8 : 3,519 BB i - f • S • S - f - S • ; - f y 760 : 400 s 560 S 72,381 i 4,127 S 4 727 j 4127
Task 16- Public IMormation and Outreach 8 14 S 1,248 22 S 5,456 $ 5,456 $ S $ 40 $ 40 $9,687 $ 3,229 $ 3,229 $ 3,229
Taak 18 Subtoh/ 0 8 14 0 0 0 0 S 1.248 22 S - S - S 5,456 = - _ - _ - ; 5,458 ; ; S 40 i 40 = 9,687 S 3,229 s 3,229 ; 3,229
Task17- Phasall PraDasi n 3co Devalo ment 2 12 16 4 2 E 1,947 36 $ $ § 3 20 $ 20 $6,559 5 2,186 5 2,186 S 2,186
Task 17 Subtohl 2 12 16 0 1 0 2 S 7,947 36 S • S - S - S - t - S - S - S f S 20 S 20 ; 6,559 = 2,186 ; 2,186 = 2,186
UnanUcJpated Supplemantal Servlces = = f : _
TOTAL-ALLTASKS 40 I25 IIO 310 d0I 19� 38 S 91,182 1981 s 3700 S 7�0,127 S S,4S8 S 9,381 i 23,361 ; 21,710 S Y06,�95 s 733 ; 1.9I0 S 1,9Q0 S 4,833 S 317,228 S 103,110 f 1�3,79Y S T80,388
Direct Salary Cost(DSC) S 91,182
Ovartwad Cost 199.89Y. S 182,2W
Subtotal(DSC+p�nrMad) S 273,445
Not Fw 12Y. f 32,817
SubeonsukaMs S 208,335
Dinet No�Salary Cosb S �,635
Gnnd ToW S 517,Y1!
•
q�y�R�� NURRAY,EMRN 3 ASSOCIATEE.INC. Downtown Utllity Improvemerrt Projed
• January 2017 E�9lnee,slPlen^srs Conceptual Malysis 6 Design
a:wox arnpww.w«won.air owo�wno�w�uwy rnpoy.n«is zo�s a�saaa.a�r,c-F«Er-oowm.n uiry rnpwrn«r vm�.a a�-» Page 2
EXHIBIT D 2017 Schedule of Char�es
Personnel:
Labor will be invoiced by staff classification at the following hourly rates, which are valid
from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. After this period, the rates are subject to
adjustment.
Adtninistrative $83.00 - $102.00
Technicians $95.00 - $136.00
Engineering Designers $123.00 - $145.00
Professional Engineers $140.00 - $190.00
Principal Engineers $198.00 - $236.00
Project Ezpenses:
Expenses incurred in-house that are directly attributable to the project will be invoiced at
actual cost. These expenses include the following:
CADD Hardware/Soflware $18.00/hour
Modeling and GIS Hardware/Software $10.00/hour
Mileage Current IRS Rate
Postage and Delivery Services At Cost
Printing and Reproduction At Cost
Travel, Lodging, and Subsistence At Cost
Outside Services:
Outside technical,professional, and other services will be invoiced at actual cost plus 10
percent to cover administration and overhead.
Puget Sound MURRAY,SMITH&ASSOCIATES,INC.
2017 Engineers/Planners