Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA98-123
,r j -'-q---'-- 1,, . __r• ) 1 17 1 sSikb.... .1, , ..., • / , A._ ? , J( , _ /; ,, i 1 II / tr--.7. 1" , -----S Li/ --; ,_..." i /` r f r c— `'"� t , L. , -..-.14 '...11 Alik•-...1 ., t/•(-- •-) ( � /2` `? `ice I % ,:_ ,. ,i r, ,,,, 0. fill 1 iliiiiiiiiiiiii -41 ' t 'i ,._ ,.... ,_ ______,, , ,, • ,...._, . ,..., „ . i i„), ;, „,„ ,...„._,...... „, 1,..nly. „i„,,,. s 'E, 1 ,1 - V Ai 1 1,4 ,i\ I , 74 _ii' 1-1\ ,-• 1. 1 H._ ,F... _ I • _ .. _ _` �`py®@1;" n[[ i 1 III -. , c--\.. ,� ` r - R�' II i _. , . , , d I ! i'F ,.-",`• IISI al ,1, i , 7_I • ..- _ �I 1IPlj { 1, ' _Hfi - - ` . ' , r `-" t' ,ell .1 NI �, I1,'!', �.i�1 r: , - _ i IF`! -- _ _ -- '` .. �I II I I�' "+� • ! 1;+■ ,� �' It fi r, a s Hip�� ;• Vf �` iriglif ijf'�r '/ -..7;•---, ri - ' - V - 1- _ _ i 4 jI �.. III ., , - ► �, ��X ' II�) II '1' ''l;`: ‘, , ^ i , •-1 ► 11 r • - -�� \ '..R I RN 17. � 1� III III - . ' 1 �_ [il-- ,z a a „.4, ti a R 1 r`, Il-, : a 1, II , .11 , ,1,, .4 - .. __ . ti Imui 'ss , M-- '1\ I ii.„,_r,-'r - p 11,‘, ,,p,i .1 it,.., i' .a`_ 1`� f- � 1. •'4, A - ,, i, 1 4, ,l{T�' . I"`'' • .•, I ;a L_ 4051 1" I , I L 1 r `1 _ 1., t . 1. � 1 \. •RI, I '.L2 � !!I .I i,pia. :or 1jq aI' J "1 � 1 y -IV 1: r FA - '. L .ji.. ._ ''Vk, m• I R •;��1.►, * '� -�.� -w .� R ..te . II i . 1 ill, r .: -------1. .. ters,A. , , . t { _ 14 _ 2),iti ., / kt ligritif 0 1 - - AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL Arch,t.otute 3 ?IonnWQ _.__ __ TAMARON POINTE rma RENTON, WA 19336 SHINGTON M Ara""°t..�s "°. 9336 47th Aw.N.E. SsattM.WA 93155 (206)440-0330 FAX 362-4331 / k/_, 1 „ , , li P-11110 Fr -419111w ' .4-4r°N1164-111' .., II 11111MIIP• .. . .S'i;, •' ' , --,. ' ki. I. :., _...,........._, .--------- --e-. i_....)- .” •'.' -' .1 :- El I 1,-- all ..: 1 1 . ' • i"•;. I. ;7-::.,-1_ P- ' . .- 11 . 1 II 1-14.--.:----''- - -- 1--. 0.1 ,... ,---r- \ • . . •• al. L.14-Atil..: - 1, i Pm-It ,th,-,?..., N. .ii .:141111r i 1 I ELP in, F., , ......... .,....1... . ...- ti:,•'-...,.; :., _ .... 4 " IIIIV • -1 1 e• II, - 1, ir-.., IN _ • - --- .4 __ I )1 -",• . ...., . I I -- - 41--• i t,,1 1 III,ti ..ils, III, --....--r rrrrrr -,........, . II 1 6 }ll,r,I.:• ,F' -'- - -' , A , , ..L. r frCp "1 I' _ . A ..t.41.10.71' 'i •vtg. , .,. . -1 4 ' ....., ...ii . —,..—....:_— .-4 ...... ,* : ... - • -.;. , --ri-Pc-Vrt-- i-tA'721A.ct_ 072W1 PeMll__. -7-6C:1 CV2R--, C__•.Cg-et4 12 2ve---1--1-c-.)-16- •_4.3 , -',W. -zi),..,-,rc:14, ... -..--7-77.,rerir _ 1-1--1 I 0 1, ,,,,,,I, . 5 ,.• 4t - - ' --- e 41 11 ' ' , .. . . . - —. '.ix _ _ -__ _ _ - ..- .. , -----.-- • I 1 ';.-- ' I. . . - --• . ---,-, ''''''" 11"."'' • . •'4:4 - . '-' , II III,Hill I Illi'IT - - mg 415,1.111.11111111111111.,, c'FFr-Per 1:Eic FI:r2v1K-- -,,4-1-/NNE:t.,=",‘AY21W-...- -••• - . 44,- 4.-,..,:. ..:0'. •er„--.......• _ . ....:,, -, W.- 11 con.- 1,21M 1-11607.. Fil21.4 IP-M.3514*, - - . . ,.. _ ....- .. _ ... - ....- ,. t ir . -- - .....-•-•--:: '^ - -__ .......... --........, ----1L. J----, IP ...,- ... • ... ..,_:- ,-, :ilia. ge i nk, . --- ,ten•-' /--, ,„-4110, Iii -•-- -,-!--..-- _ :AIL diaR /1 ... — --...i.....- ..- - ....,L -7.... L III ii-- , ....- 411 t -i, all -- ,r_f. i i . ____ -----, 1- i -//11111/-v. ' 101- 'AV §111_,IIii ..+Amok , ' \ fl/f\ -apeV.I.........../ •.talli ..."- N..,, 4 --'0, - . ' 01. - - ;-_-_-i, -- - - _4; 4/ / i - . ) / --- ---="r— ' _y I II I .--_-:-.,...:4.- . ., _--- 1 -. - 1 -__ , ),,:; __,,,.-e"- 7-:47•Nr.menwo 7 oi- ,wolr'11.4.1"a:il aral......" .'".. . : -- - -; il ii`.--s1 - I' * , y/) ''‘A' 144,7--', 1_1 , !I.. ''.-w6-=`'‘I-Imu.----C."1;6°J.:111-111111____Ilidilli,1111 11111111d 1 z 1 _ _ 4,4= _-tAct.-- ...)11.)Dcvv' , . .i .. __—__=—....miscr?._,.. -- - L•ri ------."-- .,- • — 1,7llii.s....a.Tiii....7.44,1, ........ .. ,.. . , ,.. . -..,,_ i- 1 . 0 ii.:-...-.,_,.r.7-.....j......-_?....____....... _ . _ .„......,.,„:„.;,..............:z; .,,, , .,,, A / . --- . lia , 1 ...._,.. . , _ . ,. _ 4, ...,„.•,.......„,r, ,.. .....„... . v. • „, ,, 4% /a PI A .e. ''..1'.:MPF ".111 1 I lij '.. -i.. --.-,--, -.---p,-- , _ -z--,- • 71- _ Iii 1• 17- i. . ...."- , „,,iii. : ...--- 11 .N. ...k...t_...... ,0-" vli. ..._ .:„.• NA=•-<,.-- - - 7.-...---,. '''' '..WeeTe......". III ' 1 1 1 . , 4r-er-ee- . , ir. C_/-\-___,..- _ , h._. t ip ill rikrawit, ----,reW, Ill me, kl j$ r•71., 1.________,_______;_________ , - ' r' -...: ..e.'..4.• '• .., —111 ''` 1112.1E-!f i ill 0. . ' • .:71",."- II-- 7 ..1r::•'' -,--; ,, . i , . .., ,,,,„.2c.,...__, ....,1 - .11 ,...... . ' ...1-..Am i .....- N3 •--k„.,.-4 • 4 ilk Zit‘4,..,::1:;',:,!.,-.'1'.-- ..1 ....(--; . .- •' . ,.., •••• I I. ..„,,,,,.. ......._ 1.1,..:,, .. mill A rori _ ... .. 1 l'snclocy . tizi..1/(..^T.-,e -ay-pr r...........,............ S . . .- r17..7...T.......... .... .4.1 .17.".4.4 V1PA/ cF wazowe celsreY,:a„, / r __: . . / / / . - i /.., , kr 1 • A ......m.m. ..... ..• .-•• goseamisamaiggigiamaginimmomai ., " f' 1 . : '- *k-. ‘‘. ..;,a; Lz., I I ; . .ill IN .., I ' I . ..- oil ...: ,:.:,;!' .........6....... . - ...,-- - 1 ,. PIII 11 ' 1 .,/ s' -',.----_.....-- ,,'' .......:.4,'. -•....---- ' ;fil • i IIIII \\ f.-k • ,i --_._. i , ' f_4.4,5 . ) i• • ,..„.... ..........ifft •:: ,,, ••• -If -\• _ . Illil II ,, . - '010 ,r,:t7' •".1. t'*-7:1 - -- --* " mrre" 1 -.- .I. It 11 \ Ill 1 i ( . - AP!i, ea ji 11 ..,-- , • • ,.11 .,,- 14-s. _._. , _ I r , --_ -4. ...., ... ._ ..,, ... ,----- , . ,.. • --VP mem_ p JII A T -+„.... - - •-• l'( I r. ' r r . • ....,7 . , . . _, A" ''" •-•...-' . --... 4- . i: , .. i r _ .-... • ' -----,..., gli) , , / -4% l.kiti...-Vr1....) 0.-..r 4-521),-, __, ..„ .__.# \,I.N. :1•-)-e ' ',.---,--,-,-;ft__ TtAA4.-ritic 0.0cirren 'VA*.Y.-.' _ — 'NI ,10.,F,....j i 1 7.-, ,... • -4 . - ;i7._C.-1.-1 ir ..,_i_j 'tif----.... . _.......' _„ ...-4:V1.,, - ' ' .,, :ii'. • • , _-____................_____--..., -ft-";":...-," '• --' ., AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR I, '. IlhcrA gtlecturo k Plannin TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL P..1JA.1.: - ,• ..CA •,-, 2‘....- I t • C. *.. .... t.1 ' 41o, rma .....__ _ TAMARON POINTE ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER •i= t,si Fx--.-.1......„1,...., , , , '--# -7--- 1!. , _i• ' ' --e-i - ii, _ :.4., J.., .., i ,4 .'41,'• 114 ''.ikv,S, '!'' 611 .'\ Rutledge Maul ArotrIteets.P.S.I 19336 471h Ave.NI. RENTON, WASHINGTON - cortp--got. acuPIIA, or, ie. s.atti.,W A 911165 :-. c2061 440,0330 FAX 362.43111 Vilkoi . „.., i,.t ,.......L,'...e,,,,-* *. ' ',,.*!*t,•• , 0:.: ..,,, * • , ix ;iv.- • ,'' . •".e..***.:- . ., _ 1,4 _ ,_ •:% . _ - - ., --:-'4•4' '-'(•,1a; s . _r1A,o- ..;----,, _,,r„?... .i.. .6. 10" --------------------------____. . .-----._*0._ . 1= in -.----7--2 ___--.--01 if I vif 2 Itili•".., . . a --:--‘-- • 4r4,..„-, _ - • 4- -- , 4. ,.•:•,..,, . ri r- -.-..d, •‘,..;) / ,t-''•,..7:1- in II IIII sin Ill ;•,,.. , --> 77 ip 44 . .,4*-.. . , , °15 —, • ' "'---,r1 • ill " m Jog il t• • , . * : ,, • , ., • , • ..L...5'.tik_ *. p-----'- ' - , u ... ., • -• - . , • -. .,,,s,t. • •tv , ". . u NU 111 MI' * - '''' . I'°. • ':.. ., .I. . Vil ,. tw' .r ''.' „,,.. •,_. , ' IVIIIII "II " ' 1 , t ' li , ar --.Int_ i 0, %I, ,t. 2.,,--- .; #*`: . ,._7' ".,``', '•,.,,, j1114=r" Ax 0 i .- 1. j'.:'.. 2 I .. ., ."' -_,_ _ ,: ill . ': i 0 , .-„_04P,•-,..,t, s't: •,' _r :;''. ,, , cita,..11-.A > VI -` '.,, ''.."-' , '-'7'21-i -' ' ''' . - '''' , likiitsa• ''3 "11 1 1 I. 1 11, •., ,, ., d ± '' t N&Y . • Iii I ., __,- - ,,_ .,.,._ . 4. --11ww • ( I I . 4 J •t /,....'). ii !I , -- - ----.'--- '. - _---:---- -----1.-----T ;4- • .; , F••••-- , A _.• (.4..; -'--- ) ,i. ,, A , 1, , 1 _ _ . -,_.;;;;_------,-----••--__— '..- •:, , '• _ .". - .,, ,) • -11 ..... ) r-- Pi' if \ill •Till .., - — -_ _ - ''\'r ,; ? .! 1). 11 ;JA,1 1-1 ''' ''4 ,t-G, --ryie2, 4-c-- t3e7.--H e?'r. 77/'/&. - - _ -_,,,. ;- ;it.It. . 1 • r i ,,,, •<- -7-•'----4 I /•7-E e.,44.4,77,--- ,t,f ,4-krregi/tc .)'? ""tr-- ' It- .• :..' • " . --- -____\AA4...,47g/ i r .,...-- -'7 / - - - --- • •, - .' --, "•" -°7 - -• i! .„:41.• . ... . ...„.; — - — --- ,F.-- • - -_ , ., ,.* .- _4_, . , --_,, _ KL AtZgouvic2 190.1_ a_-..--cg._ fo _..„,....,. .........._..... _,..1,,:a..5-_-- • _ 4 L.,_ , ., ' ,...f _ , , viL, ,.„, ,J, -,-._ _g-=-..k._...L.'. ,,, .. .2.-.7-4,..,....., •,..._ -____--- _,-.• „,, , ..„.•;› - /J.* , Al-) ,:- •" , fot - --..--- imomoirit :: ..., -:_...--- :„,;-, . -.x.: •.:." , . —r ' - rj. r—"-"--- ----- "!I . „Tajt..lii"'' i -•'---,.',•'1 4.‘ , ,\% .) ---' '17,7R .•:. ... .4,,i.„7' I.Coti".•`"-- . ,•-•- ',i'' --- -co,---,-• - -,---‘14,"'.2-r.----;',' • :' 1F-2.: ,--si-----0t--,.,i, k•-' • " ,-- ------ --;ce. . , • ;- ..„ ___„. . • , •. . ..,..--- _,/,„,,,,,,eg eiv-i-x-f-A,--A9k/e- t‘-',...,e, - ' - "/A , - - _:_ -tr,''''.:-.te•-" --..,,,,,A ;!±.0‘ '._111‘.:.- r-cr_51-461w1. j110,7-1 --------- -11477.1e7-77- al..,c...4... ,. .-:;,- ...- , - ....0,;(7. ,,,„ .--. , oirAlw7,--x-P--A N -.-------`' 7,04' . • .1.- .... .-',Q;-,0_____,,r_ 4.,. _, .., 1 ,.. ill(i i - ..,„1, , - , 0„ ;t:------ • • '° •, , 1. 0, 1 -- t .....11, 0 ___:_._ -:._ CI-- .- - , A p 0 A T Ef 9,4,,,aer_l_ . ,----— , .._ ILLUSTRATION i_ ............,..! l 1 1 if-----•• -.A ,P1 A • 0, vi.LAA 0 tilitildi A — --r-4.-... .. -'......--- , ,, . .. - , AI 4 111 . 1 r,.....0„.....„. 1 e...."1? L4 r 41... 1 :iv : / mo.,„, ,-‘(f )1.....A....,) 4 l.,y., 10 iiii k a a' . 5 3 1: . ... ", _ 2 2 1 . -1,4 0• ' • a i ;. ' '11 III i 1 z ill. 2 1 Griot-4mo f i , i .' \ - : : - : ' ei .2) -1, if ' Ililit --' -- ' 4 t • - Will p Or '-. 4^ • .4, . , * -I --- , 10 it-ri • '. ' ,Iri'. .. d '0*, i..„,t4iffip si _ __111,0,1i ,t f . , , II. /. 1/4.,../ 0 ,,,,,.0 ,,,, , - ---,, - iNli .,411 I ,r/.1, - f... 0416, •*".1. •er:ing, d, -_,••••.. ..........•••° t ' .. • . ., 1.1 , 4 , _I...000 , Aprol'IllIW "" • ...----..". \. ''' ,17:..,7;; ., -7)'''./ -4' •-.0. •Nv I\ '' .1' ' •M-• d 11110:Cel .„) (../ X •• --.„ .../ 1._ \rj I---- opp•- 1•::$1X--t. yr,' 4, *X •%1ZN .''"' , OVE. ' 26{ 11111M11.111LILIO 01.111....fra.„. , ' A ,,,Aw.•' - , - , e-iv- /. %too.%./i0v,. .. ,________ . _ croe, ' - • i '' , .• A) /4 1,, orb. # ...,,,,,,,„„e , , ., oxr..._______ -_-_,...-..-...--- ., 1 ,7•1 ,. _ __, / 2 ,..,, ._ , ,,,,, ,,,,. , .0....,,. mfauntikss. t„......--,, -440 , ..., , . • ---- - ' :-._ I, _ ____.-io. -•- -• z«., , A i f 111V16k. fes,.. etat%lati 1, - _ .:•-r, qr., , -"-- 4 r \ 4111 — 010200 4i/11%, ,I,Wir-- •-• Ilft-e- IF It, , '-'"'"1" 3kg. _ , ••• - - II— m,11. 11 / ' - 12,)2-4)-41,11111111Mr1)10001I\ : --; - - . I 1 um. iw•Itwil (-- _ -_ .____----,-- . refra , t . t; ora p -",_, , — .s., t 0' 4\ i5e)x--\ fti 4,-, , ,...: , „,flosp. - ,2.111/4 so ..--_- - ------ -----• forni; 1 I . ‘ i 4 etio 1 , , ,, „ii, . , Ce LE\i',4,-1-1 D 1-1) 411-1 ....,, II 101 ..../ ............--• Maw, as,alg.__ - • I. " 1 Ei-H-1-- .2_-< 4.•••,-T EC, I / -------___........: ' ‘• ' • • ' 1; . •. Archit•ciure a Pic•••.•,. ..--'''-- F 'L--CtOr--i-r- -.•• --_xEre.,„•-/ \naielf 27 , Ci/gYter, k•./i/ rma ... ‘Sgu,s3'f334:6 td1 4147"V 4'4AA°v'''1'9:1'4:5E:36:453: AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR (2061 440.0230 TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL c--IL "1-17-'s' I TAMARON POINTE SITE CHARACTER } / 'il••.'• k '''.-...f . -*...,_ .„....:‘:._,,,:r'_...,. ::::,-..-,-- ,p _ . /1;t4,1\ . ' tv;•%% 44,9' si.,„_\ • `t-D.\1\--- •_ . ..... _. Fes ' ✓,f".�. :. '- i.s f , ,,,,\„,,, ' /:' '.1)::‘!'-'\,‘ lr i. , . , F 4 NIA /HI\ 7* ,7, _:1_1' , '___,......rriir ' '.-- :"4r,.,.. .i_:::' " a. : 1,.,...". i.14.,,,,,,,,fr.' . I C O► a , Pm -,A--_,-.42)..kaiiir° , ' - ' 1.1 ' ' _I ---1.N., . !El .\ ,,,, -..,. . / . ,. . .14 2°'-'''.....,.,,_L*,.-i--cll'.',...r.--...--' .,f,1:11‘,• 7 4.4.4,11 ,,, ,,_ .. AmpiAi;z•-•,,akA , s. ,_ , _-:-,;•-• . .--•,,,,!• fff Orr I • k. "/ I i �if� t "I.� i 1 ' j _ ---- r 111 1 A I i.A. d 4{! I ! Mesa `` I _ I�_I ' '1, "1r` I �, 1 • ► as r' - i.it _ ;,-sr � �' �,4 /• ' I� [•' I 1 �_ (T 1 '1 a i,f._ a �. 1 IV —_ i I: !VW r • is it" 7w _"'® Y,I` I y ,1 i't AIE 2_4,, l__--- -"--' ,----:iiii • ..61.'41 ...• in• — -. 11!:------:-.,---:- . --'- • ,lidiX.',.i7;;- 1; ,e_ . _ --- _.-.•:- mil- -m_ w—mili- 1. . i.,......,,,. ���� ���� mii �oi�i ,�,;.:MI Milli. , _= _ ' ;�•11 t' .f ai AIL_L • -- ::: .;; f_. I :- .:;— ' EH_______J IL- _ ..... itt; e,..'.1.•-;_,•.*Aiki.V.,!'".•-• ,,,,, (-_, • ....„. ,_•._ i ,_ . ...,,,_ .4 i ima - II._ .1-4 I.--Fitt ----- i '. Ll , , . . ... ..,_. , ri__ . , �� 1F-11ET • .mi , ` i . a4';`' • Y i - L.. /' 11 ,, , is ‘III —,........___( _ ,ti 1 { i > ' -1.,. .. may; .:ate 't4 1, i., :1 , . • • 4n 9 IIIM \1 1 f --- 11. 1 — .,_ ----. — j II 1 i t _ ,i, 1,. 11 i I 1 II/ - ' \ \ c--:',.iAlligt ; ' . ' , , , , ;t0II` E- — „ 11 — —III I il 1----- I i ., ,.,, ,L -- 1 , i . tx,---41 , , .,----.,, , ,,, ,. .... ,, „. , , .. _ ,,, , ,, ... --. '4, . .... .. .,, ...... ,,, . r, \ ., II, , ; -_,in.....,1 r -- Al_ Ili 11.•■r r Q } ; / ■_ r . ICI-4= rt .i 7 1 I f! I tFf�it�� y,..` 1 c I I. i f I ie ..u.+ III y N+ • I fI l r1 -f. i r' I f r*1 a ,, ,..... I .r,----- .a 1... / ,),,4, i 1 , 1 LJi1røøt41# 1 I ..._ 111-1, -r , — • ; , y lr .C1 & ' 4 �� ` .-y ,„„7_,.... r �,t. r.- s�- {{- T .,� y t ; iiii 1. _ r__,_k,/ i 1 � \�It Viz.: ;."I �' a_ % 'qf,+ 1 , 11'1 �fk:r .\ 11 Ii Ii �1. �/l 1 I1 V r p1 » (, f r'�+•,r 1, kj- 1I _ trr. 1 . Gp v 417 ll ti. 111I1' ' •,,� ,"Mi. 1 I , 1 :, 11 0 II 4 01 w x 04.111. ,, \4 , id ii)ive°,..,e-- r _ , ,7 " /7 , gi __,_., - - • • • %\''Z'k N1N 4. i, gi , ,-- +,_Lt ' ' t l' st,,n, ,,s4 , Lsik. I... I —7 t NM 1 . Sib ' ,:;.= lin I Ink . , 4# „, .. ___ ,./ f, I a 171 i 1 . 11.° :1.. 'i+, t • pi , ‘ i /iv'I I m Mtl 4, MEP ',Mt /,_.•_. ,ff a 4 I - -,..„-q-,j- .,. „ ,, , .... .,„, I =. vv-i: -.. 4' I Bs __, 4' , - tt, ......,ACILILIIII mom .4 k. IV . 1 --""A ' ' s. a , , , ,i, . . .,4,;._ , • , . . , , \ tit a___n___1 , :, , 1 \ am. --7411".' ,' 1 l N, V .41 . i • . i Le. ,,,, .,,,, .. , 7 % s,-.. -'4111111 r10116, ' • F1 r I . I� r. ' W' ___ r114116...MMIllgv I'll .1!-------. IIll'illWeirikum-- A irt .......i...k...1":-' '..e. 2—:".212112r412121.21" - 1 �+1 I•_•,. j r ...',..,_,.._., \\,-,-1 ,i.,.,„i• I-i4:.2-:a"--..f'l...a... .rii'r 4" ` 1 ,• .,. ., ,•- _,• F '' ': I::fR1 I . _T i III' • 1 14, �1 Iii C4.-..,\ I 11 r 1 .'it,' ' „am, 4 ss ... -. __ ,..., , , ,r,_ , .„. iir,„.-.::;\t‘ 4.,.\ . .1 _ 1 : ___,- - ,/ -' .!I- LiN --N.: itli , --P.— il I, .1,2' I i ' _ 7 ,, , _ ..'67. 9., ..1...——___MININit, ...i , ' — 4 1 ir -7- \ , , r � � -_ IIMMIP-•11 _ 1 ►3 :. \ , ; i. r -- , . : , 441,4 - iiimmr--ii I , ,, ., . — c = � _ � - ■ I 4 1 ,., llill I _ - Al I ilk I ` ' ----- 111111%.. � t I , , i , i I f 'I, li , t.,.., 1 ,I. , -1 \ I 471 ril I , /,,o'' 0: 1 ftir_1-11 p.. .,,i ,_,_LiJi, , , ,, „, \\ ' " lik , ' ' \ , I 1 - .„ id , '—-""',t , ' ) 1 Olikir \ 41Prwinup r l __ - I', ',Ai* 'Isilk \ I\ ' I." pcw \, , ma,---..) ,-.. 6 * \{„, r 4.. I _ A 1 4 y _ __, 1:= - - _ , , i ' . 1 , , 1 '_., -' I pr IND .•r... \ Vat S \ 1\ / N ( \ \ _ Ale . / ! v_ ‘ I '"n"'MMMIIIIIIII.IIIIIpppllr.IIIIIIIIIIII -ein�xc a WI �-, �&AIDIYC t9 �� ;5 I P I■ 0 t , i -1 In " —-- A.aail ` ,.,.:i. • —exr 1 p-rymc Sfte Section '(�C Luke Washington Blvd. `uesa WATER TAMARON POINTS MSS— Leh , /J 7, ' ;#) / ________, \ _ ___----____, r I ilF1 / [ 1 D / . / „.„------ 1 \ 1-----1 \\\\ ,,,, , ,,_____-------- \ _._____ ,, ,,, >-- \ - t1 , -,-\------- ' . ::,--- ---'-'-':----- \ \ \____,.-----_,-------- / 1---- \\ \ \ y \ _--------- \-,----'-' \ \-1_,V.---\,,---- \ //\ \ c, \ ,e"\\, Ni'.. -C- \7;,41,,_13,---\ Nj \. P E xl,,, 2 wvI ' _ "Ir1,111:74:1:: i:* ' - ..ti • ' ► S y r [] s `, . Asa . • �,� J 1 � ` • 0°4 1*) t: (4 - r t, i, ,., • •t• ► • II 1 . , li!Ili Al, .. • S . . .4 1..• ! . P (� -. ,,. ` r r`Lit^. r , � ., s i. • +t 'ir' Y' • the yr y I , . 1i ti t'J. , r a •• ' i .. ..14. , • ,r.:4.. /7'41., :jfi'...'":,<" ....414.I.' • q• r . � 'n �� ` r.r •. , , •• ..'Y hr:'+�.[ +AIM' ' ~- Ash,. -i-y- iy, ,„,:th,;.4-47,..4.7w,-,. f ►z l,ww,,14 t".... 4* .�^' . ► . ofilk '�'' 4 .► i.r .Z . I T. 'to Ii `�.A 4,-,..4 h' r / ' �, .....,,•... . : , . '. h . e „liv • e ' *I:: 111 4:8;' 4 ' , ' V. t? ' ' ' •—•'• ' %'. . r t-. ,.. . f' .44— l ' ...*, . c.,briolojyr 4 i ..., tti, .• ,4 • ,f• , • t **A.ir . A i ••.11:41% ,.. .,4 , 0 4 W. 4 X/ .. "r 4 1. 1, ' „ , - 1,1! I:. Ilir• . . •,,* •• ip .• % , i . ,,,,i 0.4,• e 1 41 I I I le r,:t., --- - 4 ' 41%••, ,,, . , likii-',4/ .. i -16; • siti .• 4 • - 4 It 0 .170t6.irr"4Cyri A . 's, �, •� , r r • . 41 iidA , -.. 1 fill. . ..... . • I 1... i••A.'' 4 IV Vii, 4 of, .•• • ' 3� : J. �. f -11 .. . *-"•• NV. • ,. 4r • ......ii. „ig . .... I -,;,.P A. -or L :/`1 , .4,, '11'4. • . ti S•, '.� at 4 , f' r .L► /,! fie{ 1�- r3. Y• r r w �} } ,, . VIPmita6411. -irbi .":‘ , A - ,!:, ...:. .. . h--i -, .,.., 4 tf:, 'Cr:. IrTIP 1. .. , liti t. r.:, ,I:,It q: .• ' • . -et*..)."7 ' i s' .• '• ci.. • - i ir ' ..lo.................. • • •c4.-tpv..r"1.itt;i• 16- • '- 446 : . • •,-• '-{! 1.-• 1 -J.. • "‘., .. ' :I. .- ••"10161..y 4.-are.).ire ,!;70,11,44/0" 1' qh'-, , tiallit4,44.;- . ..e. t • 4. . ''''. A ' 1 ,,f. a 01• rrigif' ' , 4,' 4 4,01, . ..41. .110' .fter -....• I ,N •ik Sp A • 0 .• .kp t iti I tO t 1 . if .•k . tt )/11 alit\- . ' • 1 p , 4 - ' . . - , : - 4 •._ - 7 ,. • • 'It pip f . _A' . irl`\'-or• . ' allk :4 to • ' 1 ) t . ' *-. ' • N4 . ( r• ‘ rAP\„A„..` ,`• . , : a,/1,r 0 . A"a ''.a 1 ‘• •- -r. iermt. - /N ' ,:;.: .. ,,,, ill• . ••-*- . . fp, .0"Ir • 8f‘ 4 . Ask- IL - up:7'1,, .4 ,P ;i ..,,Ir..'',•11, A.fiff',/1` , 1,141,4'. , ., - 1,t. .... %, A , w •. . w, .7.1, _•("liv iir4 or (4,),„\ „,, ....>.. .•• ,... , i 4110 ,c 1'41 • ..‘'. 1 . . . AO dillb‘' 111 4. • t. ' ...• ...: . I A •Ilk• A. ir.146*44 .- ,,, ... . 11., . ..‘,. .. fY,,fri:;:- •1; .4 4; Vit .!:''' r' '" 't••.4•14.''°' • - . • a%•V )1?*441 IF.% 1 0 . • • ••• • ••...' •;',. '• 44 4.t. Ailtr.. s:76 . r Ilk 4 4;01.P 4 . . 44 • •... - i . , . ,- ,.:4.....,- . 4.• ' •, ' . id • . 0 .. ij.' *r.•'. * - -v •• . .• I_ lip tilir . al, '''. '10‘• i , ..!! f / i', . ' '• 1..,:A,,,'•t.•••• ;A' --, to. - • - a ..-a,.tit7 - i •- s _ '' ; ' \ . • . . etilillr,eie'l .,-• - i 111 , " • I. • , , , ./. . t,s .. .. tji '41" .06.• A \ , , k ,r.:. . ., ...,„ -t: ,• N..- , ..2;-‘.: • ... ...,4n. 4 \,."::: 0 io ost., • .- - . .. ,. i• Ale dr. • ,4 de* t, ItiollfrIA orifie:'. -4; ,'% i 1! ' '','..,. ''.'' o4;!..•?.'-:1. .7', ' ''•. • It ,„ • , • • - . r . .PP ..„„ore .... r . , ,, . ., ....„,•',...0.' A.. • .,% ,,,. .. • .. 47, , .‘,.,„ - N.I.tri.:-•- i •0° IP 1 •h II 1 ' ••• ' vi ' ---.*4 1.. -1.44:1„ _,.„1"5.-r T .4....i., ... / • •*":',...., - . ., r .. • '4 ...go ;IP... ° • ' 4 g 4 74.4.• •. ,44 .,«: Oir,---74-s ..1-..- \ - ' 1" .."14'.11 litifritt.. 6 0111 • ... . . '. . f'4 ‘ -.. .. ,:• .. ‘411 V.alli,. eot. . , . . .. .."...... ,M1 . 4 a . .., . ,•. „ . .1-, . 1- . i:#411•1 : 61111p • : •. ft ‘ 1.4 4116.1711144"1"."V.-11" 41.......".........".71:17 ,•> A. '' : I.* ._ :•11. .1 14... .iers• ..: ., - / .., \ ._ tocitils..._\_: . ,,,. ._ ‘• c. : \k. la - A ‘ V mir11.- * -4 - 4 • , -1 ., 1 le t• , .1". . ....itt . tt„... . s. /•• 4,1‘ Ir ♦ •�^� T• :•x.F•Y k/ :T T`�.,�is` 1 ti:'ek Z� .- t.. , 4., . a Illicilb."1 ;I . • ....s. , •. , .. ,, ,. ., , -N,N. j,_ — . • .. • , \44 ,iiiipi tti. N,,,, 1g • . s. ..;4" :,N11`. • -111110:-111 . '� ,;tie - `� � ~ 7�, •*;•'t• - '1 ' .� 1 .• , ‘' . 1. 1 T •; r . lik ii M r „.k. -,.. : .% lilq,, _;'. ..,,i...% ..„ .A..:..;v416...y.,. .. ..s. I •t: Pi.• t ,..vl '4R t +r•'•&J . . ( t• . ,�•1• ••• • •4• • N...„ ,. 4 — j5.116 . 14• .,,,,tt. , , .4 ..1 . •:. ,.1".? ir,,.:.77110. .\c„ -•.,t,... . : : .dljt II, • ,,.-.6.....-. 4 1 . •• • --, . • ,,4 ! . .• ! • }•y:• y • 4.%, ,„ .,•,t1 •Y -i .Ti` A 'sir 11 • _lam •• � •• i7� •� 'l �.`ivs...��. ' '• .kr . 4_ • .•� 2 ,, • V •f • • • 714 . .may ;� ,x , �� • Ili t di f f, • • w6 It k)lilt:. .% I, •• 'S•ill, .;4.% " 4.-.'-u:.:1... .14. 1.:..r.C.44° ., is, — *.Ar.114 C • •-• • . . It,. • ..414; , Nrrli.111141)1i, 4 4. ' • . • �ix,; • • �� , •• a. rt • , : Ark}. • • I ' i • �71 •Z • J mil• ti •�. tiNkb ...' -•�• �• + ;'. ,. ~ , t- 'h -Y • • s , .4 , t vt..L.',-tir'.., 4„: . .,.. ..„, 3 •aiv' i he r . • . - • s •it si— . .; . 144 ,. . •- . - 1/4- . ,• .: t. P., i'''. , ... tit„ . .. • .,•,triv vi. i.. .. t e. 4 . •• _ it. • 4, A . , • 4J v ir•••••`4, 2:•• � i • ..40 ,il„ 1., - es,y •. .. ,h , . . „ .,..4 ' ' ' . 4".. c '•..N.t. t ,. 1.--,.:4,,:1414t„• i , 4,„", ',;.- , -.. li ....... . kh ‘s, .•.....s.2,4..,. .a.0...: b &N .,N,, 4 ,....vir. , i , 40t4t 1 •44 Qv ... x ,..--, . • • ik. Ir • ► ti.II la' 11r., • , . •yfir. (U Z-• P I. � 41*- • tom ,mot. . •�PJ ,It • 4II r i^•. r ti•. , , L A4. 9f/2 3 - H 'ii1 20020326001550 CITY OF RENTON R 10.00 Return Address: PAGE 001 OF 002 City Clerk's Office 03/25/2002 11:05 City of Renton KING COUNTY, WA 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Property Tax Parcel Number: 229650- 2000 Project File#: R-090-081 (Lake Terrace Park Associates Street Intersection:2100 Lake Washington Rezone) Boulevard North Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton 1. Tamaron Pointe Lp ts-s t-C-1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in King County,Washington, lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard;except that oportion platted as Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 86, in King ta County,Washington;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law. CV, cel Parcel B: Lots 39,40, and 41, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 86, o in King County,Washington; except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by N deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 1020457;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining,that would attach by operation of law;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to •N said property by operation of law. Parcel C: That portion of Lot 28, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, in King County,Washington lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot, distant being 122 feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot, being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel D: Lot 27, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 86, in King County,Washington;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel E: That portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in King County,Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, in King County,Washington;thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning; thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27, Eldon Acres,with the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5: thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, in King County,Washington;thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning; thence North to the true point of beginning;except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right- of-way(200 feet in width)of Pacific Coast Railroad Company. I' Whereas the Grantee, as named above, is the holder of a restrictive covenant dated December 12, 1983 and recorded under Recording Number 8312120558 of King County, State of Washington; and WHEREAS,the City of Renton,Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1983; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development of the site; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants applied to the then current zoning; and, WHEREAS, the zoning of this site has subsequently changed; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the removal of the restrictive covenants on March 20, 2000; NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby authorize the release of the restrictive covenants described above on the land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City has caused this instrument to be executed this au/ day of Imo, 20 0,2 . �u\�\\UNltlIUUW//11/0 City of Renton �� pF REjy'°�,,,% 4,„,,,, 2 tvi, ..... 3*' SEAT *a Jess nner, Mayor L .- -- 42t. 4 • *, 66t-h4tu •Ni. Watte, .' ��h�,,,,//IIIIII�III�IH111\\\�� Bonnie Walton, City Clerk in alt a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COI _O.��4. '�.. � COUNTY OF KING ) D. •,: .craw� and Bonnie I. Walton signed this instrument and i -to". ;. we, acknowledged that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument �'�% / $OTARY ' di find acknowledged it as the Mayor and o , i" .. • i City Clerk of the City of Renton, WA to be the ev pi to Free and voluntary of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned f -'in th instrument. ti •.a ' ems % , ,.,,,,,-,,,,,.-- ,--4.„„/6--c,-.4..-ki �`em0v .„—"� Notary blic in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) Suzann D. Lombard My appointment expires: 9/9/05 Dated: March 20, 2002 s 20020326001550 '� `Return Address CITY OF RENTON R 10.00, PAGE 001 O OF 002 Cityletle,s Ofice 03/26/2002 11:05 :Cit)+of.Benton KING COUNTY, WA r �� 1t)55'Soutf Gtady Way�� Renton,VflA:98055' -11.41 ,/pj"�.: S 1 / / / r r 1 .RELEASE QF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS w , /`,?'Property Tax Parcel Number 229650- 2000 / Project Fite#,. R-090-08I (Lake Terrace Park Associat6s:. ' Street Intersection 2100 Lake Washington Rezone)/ f..:k Boulevard North Grantor(s) ......./ / = Grantee(s)• 1. City of,Rentofl + 1. Tamaron Pointe Lp LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel A That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W M ,in•King County,Washington,lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard,except that o portion platted as Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86, in King County,Washington,together wtth..th.at portion of vacated Southeast 100"'Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would..attach by operation of law cv _ef) Parcel B Lots 39,40,and 41,Eldon Acres according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,Page 86, • in King County,Washington,except that portion of Lot 41 Conveyed to King;County for road purposes by N deed recorded under Auditor's File No 1020457,together.With that portion of va+ated Southeast 100" •r=:• Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attachby:operation of law,together with N that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance'No-'3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law a o� Parcel C That portion of Lot 28,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86,in King County,Washington lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot,distant being 122 feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot,being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot,together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law Parcel D Lot 27,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King County,Washington,together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law Parcel E That portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North,Range 5 East,>W M ,in King County,Washington,descnbed as follows Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington,thence:West 172 feet to the true point of beginning,thence West to the point of intersection of the South brie ofTract 27,Eldon Acres,with the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Sections thence:South to the North line of C D Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden,Division No 5,according to the:plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 83,in King County,Washington,thence'East a point South of the,true point of beginning,thence North to the true point of beginning,except that portion thereof,tying Easterly pftheWesterly margin of the abandoned right- of-way(200 feet in width)of Pacific Coast Railroad Company l 'Y 1. €y / ./ / / / ¢' t._.. / / ClibPDF -www.fastio.com ✓Fts' "`� • /I / .._w r� ,, f / .F p/ f`+ f.f: ,,. 'Whereas the Grantee,as named above,is the holder of a restrictive covenant dated December 12, w j 1983 and recorded under Recording Number 8312120558 of King County,State of Washington,and a.,,, _,,./ WHEREAS,-the City of Renton,Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of 4 approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1983,and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development of the site,and; + ," /". WHEREAS,,said restrictive coveran#s applied to the then current zoning,and, WHEREAS,the'zoning of tbis'site:has subsequently changed,and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants-have either-been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property,and WHEREAS,the City Council`authorized the removal of the restrictive covenants on March 20,2000, NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does herebyaathonzp'the release of the restrictive covenants described above on the land described above IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said City has caused this instrument to be executed this eW day of 1714Ae -, 2'20 D. ' 1 ! City of Rento� O F � r .... fc,‘) '..,--...1 ,/,‘,./* 'ie,v: . eviois-va"---•/ �x x>. , . `M nner,Mayor * SEAL—Jo ... -%1L....x. - ,k-: ii...,,,,,, r c-a /ii4q Bonnie;Walton,City Cterk humrllluIl11n111� to . #. r f �?,• a - STATE OF WASHINGTON %.�`SS- la..**NNAN ! COUNTY OF KING ) _s. ' �d D. ... �t4t I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jesse Tanner o t ••••",•�••.!,`• �41, and Bonnie I. Walton signed this instrument and cs , I ;• 1 acknowledged that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument f :o OOTAgy end acknowledged it as the Mayor and •8 i City Clerk of the City of Renton. WA to be the • c li431 IC : 'free and voluntary of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned J •1#1t ,Ss�m th nstrumeni f P. �/Cj�n 7 /�j �."� Notary blic in and for the State of Washington Notary(Pnnt) Suzann D. Lombard My appointment expires 9/9/05 Dated March 20. 2002 / x r' `% u ; ! if w•i *` f H f. �..•' r f t F !' f {/�~ +� , I +` £ . ClibPDF -www.fastio.com __/ , 7- � " j CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 19, 2002 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: ix, Laureen Nicolay, Development Services Division,#7294 SUB T: Correction of Recorded Document Removal of Restrictive Covenants for The Alexan (formerly Tamaron)Apartments City Land Use File#LUA98-123 and City Rezone File#R-090-81 A title report recently obtained for the above-referenced property indicates that covenants the City Council intended to rescind in 2000(documentation attached) are actually still in effect due to an error in the recorded rescission document. I have attached a copy of my March 1st letter to the purchaser of the development, Sobrato Development, which further explains the issue. In order to remove the restrictions from the property's title as intended by the Council, we need to re- record a corrected version of the "Removal of Restrictive Covenants"document previously signed by the Mayor in order reference the correct recording number. Once the Mayor has signed, will you please forward the document by mail for recording with King County? The County recording fees for this recording should be charged to#000/07.532.22.49.14. When your office receives the recorded document back from the County, could you please place copies in both the above-referenced files and also forward a copy to: John Shenk Sobrato Development Co. #792 SI VI, LLC 10600 North De Anza Blvd. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014 Thank you for your assistance. Please call me at X-7294 if you have any questions. Attachment 1: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants to be rescinded (#8312120558) Attachment 2: March 16, 2000 P& D Committee Report recommending approval of covenant removal Attachment 3: March 20, 2000 Council Minutes approval removal of covenants Attachment 4: March 1, 2002 letter to Sobrato Development explaining history of covenant removal efforts Attachment 5: Initial Release Document(#20000522001420) to be amended Attachment 6: Corrected Release of Covenants Document which references the correct recording number of the covenants to be rescinded cc: Jennifer Henning --rotkcy44144EAT 1 - - THIS IS A CORRECTION DECL?PATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS TO ••••----....." CORRECT LEGAL ',SCRIPT I ON OF -THAT CERTAIN COYPU RECORDED UNDER KING. - • COUNTY RECOR " NO. 8 312 0 5 0 53 3 •-', DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ••• • 1 i• RECORDED 1 I :IIS PAY • ,. WHEREAS. Lake Terrace Pali( Associates is the owner of the Mit•vit MAN 13 • .:.:,:.--,., -. r.::::.i..... .,,......= 4..-.,4 - -,-- • ,•:::,....... „. property in the City of Renton.County of King.State of Washington.descrikedra001040 0N F. 83/12/tit:Ordn&El i'DMM A• :•".'4•.:•.i---:A!•& • "As'attached hereto. RECO F liNSCOONI Y . :.: •,...i.r„:„....44,: ..!.....--.41,t1 CASHSL. ****5.00 '-•;.-‘4;;714.;.;. : • il • co 22 -..........7:x; -. . .. • • .: •,..i.‘•.,,,,.-4.-ai; WHEREAS. the owner(*) of said described property desire to Impose the following ,.. ...:,.:, • 1 (c:\:1) -: ...:.•il-i',. -'i. •e':,...:1:: restrictive covenants running with the land as to use. present and futUre. of the above . .:.,.....o..1-: .-,.- 1:•••.:7 .. . el.j. described • 7'7:':,- real property. ,. . . - .'• -:... -- •:•:•7. • : .kre,,,,, •• . et. . : NOW. THEREFORE. the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant andli 7. nposes. *.':-.• iT41. . ...... .... ..,...,....... :" .01:::• ..• ' I restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned their successors.heirs and assigns as follows: . . . .. ,__-.•... ..7 ' ":,.,:ir. • . •.. .1-,•• t..- _ .....- - .. . • A. Prior to.pdalicatIOn of the rezone or:dinance for application R70907Bli. the -••--. •;iii-r-,:•t • - •,. .-. •• - app&ent shall:perivida a total of$6;45042 a voluntary payment to.the..ititi.tif Sc F - , ...-........ • • • . FtrikitPti:iNtitch fiind•shail Constitute the total contribution, 1.101.114i1....:tie.4iiio, , - . ei61442.and•. 34tekoo:H! f*.,:th of traffic IMPrciaernanta and assaciatad aictiv:idantifiaitid:41. .-]•••:1--•:.'-;-',.7).1:-.."!-.•:...i f'7-* •-:"...*.•: 1 , . . • .... . , . : ••-:-:•i.••••••••?; • :.•::"ii.: --.: . - ..4.1 I. Widen 1300.1ineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9.to 10 ' feet betWeiritierk Drive and Way to widen BOO lineal foot'of Lake* - •:•Ti'. .•::,:., •:,...,..:,. •f•-• . - :.'-`4k:.•?.41;iz.'.-, WashingtowBoulevard at Its approach to the intersection of North Pak. ....,-.•:.•;.F,1;'..... ft::•.-.-:,•••••••"'••• ••- .—D%-.4.:14vW••••:::-',.,t, .., . . 02140. - •••• . . -.:••••• li" . . ,t..., •-:' • - ;%••::::•- f-h vgl ',': .:•.-.I.' -' 2. Update the traffic signal control at the intersection of Lake Washington . •• :,•••:•-•9.i.t..?.•41, '.,•.•.1.1::..t:4:4 ..::•. :.••-r..,..-„,° 1,5;ik 1.:Y•tr-7..•••:i•.:•'..- Boulevard and North Park Drive. _-", i-.1'..,;.•,:;,-...-..:. . . -:.,j.....7Y,z2z..>:: 3. Improve the filtiorsection•or Burnett Avenue North lid 1,0.0CWitlihligit*I.' .47.......,,,,:-...x • BrilievatilliAitaftWiiaditaleteturns across trafficibtithliodnditevaitiiiii .- ..• . ,....,...e.4,,..„,4..., r-4-•, .in. , ..„ :)... . s.....,.g..,,.... .•• • ... •,..,......e.,.;,:t,rjr ..1*. ii;;;;.... :4 0;t44K- ' ..-,...,r i';:•-:. B. The:followinmett4ilitlibblipZritriet Imprcetements shall a. • too*: . •-?-•.-?••.21.1'44•41.:4 06.. ,,-;7if.:,...:•:' • dval0pm 'it pi#1141iikiiii.bithsi-City and are to be .,00.b0•_: •_:_ :,..„ -- .:•.••,..N....t.:: it il with :-devigailt:af the site should et0.sirrolopPilile: . • •_,. ,... .,'•.7.:-..•••;• - *Zak/0'..';....140.siet by ith,OCILY.•Itiii•applicoht may ._,,,, ,..... .. • • ' - 1441aitealtiV" •.,.‹.0,s•:i..- ..• ••••••x--4:-..lfc..-Isat,:i 'e. -:•A-.7•4;:,..:;.., orktelid•VidtWitiii;'tiakeidei •defarrel at ar.0'if tila Wikiii.. • adith . - . ••••• ;•k...:, ..t.• •47.-4.6-••, - the that apiiliTcaiiiiCitY'ades.- • •-••••• • • , fe:rzs'fri.."4. .,•:..--v 4... ;••• =..ft.V;r-•- •• • - .. --,-7•044,,,:: ;44-t4e.-''.2.s.i,::' . •. •t;:fr.7,'',47;:),,.',.-zi:' C. Provide total cost tot Installing the left turn lane opposite the istiiarialici the .: ::. . ,-41.,.:;i1.04..S ,1"*„.4 4-1:•'. . Lakaiickt site: - ••••-':-•• ••. .,•:: :::-, -t-10'.(4•.'e "I`T• ..0 it- .• i • 7 •..' • • . • Boulevard,: .•' ..' .. ...,Qni .._•• . • • ..•1r;S..:, '' --....r.V.I*X0,..a ;'"$7, .A.;•.. • D. PAWS&.off-site:jenkoslia on Lake Wallington : . 9u1711•;w4w,`"T. , ••• •::: • ' 47' I.:_*r.'''.' ...c. ;4,k, '../.1. .. 0 0,-.: • sidewalks. andi4iik.iittitirtg.*litchi.with MI mcenittatip9rtiridis**' - • : . .::•-';.,1 e -.-, ..-.. the frOntage tkitilitiiksaclisits. . • • .--- • . - • -• • •-.:41,',...:11- ''• ., ,..•.g• ,. .-...•• fp... . • . . ::.: ..-:..3::1.4% 2„1.... . E. Provide asphalt eurface, graval,based temporary . ... : •s•i ftelk:Ip....,. :. • • width - • :!,4040? •• • —f• •i,...-;: 1.4.• ,,- g•'-'7;,':t from the 0)04.prOarty to the-iiiirenot of-done-IP' ..'.1/ , 2....tile.,; ;; lik... • • ...443%. - 'T'' •• y ' ,•: locobed and latailidlifotcordidarialthelart arid • • , - - '1. • f. •.-:,*.. -: . • -,.' , . , .e. -Yift. -...,• it•pubao wad,. .. plant ase .-- i':•-",-4,.•..61'• =git.iiiiildetid:14"flitil:.:. ;t .- •- .-•-14 t- 441Perv.VP•til;*44.`'nw:4.. . .',.1-..-'.:!' . "....•44.,t-T , .• -••..1-„ . .• treAr ':41 iR• ;.::'•.. '• .: • -• )1i;VI,Icat.- 4 I... .f. , • . ti.tht: Of Atictio .. . - ' .-A- - . 41.,•44,' 6,05• . ."--'7• -r .• -'--'4•- • 747;••.1.4.# ' pivinikk:iii.ictiitiliffki earittal ico.,;041.1.1,.. - ..2.: :•-•.iiiri . • . . .•A .FL ". ;5,r:1/4 _. ey,001: ;.: . . ;,r".'..is • . •-:, . • - -t• %tr.", •...,. ..k '••- - *.-"-.5%. - '•A-`2,1,14-5. i..• 4'f; imifiiiethst *kill•t.kisimilk Itrotorimoalyikiliem- • . . .. . .,. . • • • •,.. •....,.) •••-*. -,t zit: APPOCOnt'il not illOuitati to*Aka**ititililatitaireiihiiiiti: . . . . . . _ THIS IS A CORRECTION DECLARATION OF RESTRICTI COVENANTS TO -*------; CORRECT LEGAT !SCRIPT ION OF "THAT CERTAIN COV!Nf RECORDED UNDER XING • COUNTY RECOR - NO. 8 312 0 5 0 5 3 3 •. . 1 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS i 1 .. ... ‘ RECORDED 111IS DAY ! •., . t 1 WHEREAS, Lake Terrace Perk Associates is the owner of the t NtlititingirtelAM 13 • .•::!..•.:-7,..-;. -:.:-.,,,-;., . , ,.... .. .....?r,,,-.-...et property In the City of Renton. County of King.State of Washington. descrilsid-eiglaid1d4ON OF .;....3.,-....-.0.4.4 • Ear12/rS&0 i .‘,11001S;3 A :•`....4.;---... 44 A attached hereto. RECD F KNS MONT Y ....:....4.K4•7: CASHSL ****5.00 • ,-- -.--di..--• 22 • -...;-!-v 1.17 .. -. .• •.1 .... • • .,..• - . .,-41.•;t4t,i• '".!.•r•-..."1-...a, • .-1A.,...'47.... • WHEREAS. the owner(s) of said described property desire to imose the following ..... -,i.:. 1 09 ::,..r.4.•:. restrictive covenants running with the land as to use present and fothre. of the oho" • .7..-e,11.4-1 ..•:!c;$•tr• •- '• ..: . ., . described real property. , - •=-,-,::$.0.,:t • • • ••••-!•.•;- ..!•4,.;. •-'•‘:.?;•-:;,-,..e.. .....i''.' ..... ' . ..."*4...,.11.% r'. . .....••If NOW. THEREFORE. the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish grant and Immo:. •:.• ; -0:z,.'4e. • restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the - • ' • ••••• .:-1-11'2- •:••-•:',-;.',••• ..„,... , .. ... . - • •I.:- -use by the undersigned,their successors.heirs and assigns,as follows: ...._...., • • . ' .:• ",-•;*;•.: •• . .. A. Prior to•pUblicatiOn of the rezone ordinance for application R-090-01. the applicant shall:Orevide,a total of$4;430•At a voluntary payment to theAliti.X4 RentOtio'4440 tiind shell constitute the total contribution, and iheklas aieck- eablisliely 14;j:the traffic itnpnivernents and associated wotioldentifl in atf41. - . ... .....,..:,::-.:.0 ••'`-14:••e"-..4_1.,.•••• •-••••gt-'7" :----- 2.iiiid:Stela*:. . . • . ..- , :..,..:.1c.,..;..; • . - • • . . . 1. Widen 80().11neal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard•aPisrOximatelY.9 to 10 ; -2i:;1.-.*•;'..,:'- feet between Park Drive end:1-kluser Way to widen 8010 lineal feet of Lake. ;;;.•;:-f-17:,..T...*,, Washington-Boulevard at Its approach-to the interiebtion of Mirth.Park. - -- - •'''...--- ••••:!:14:;;.-!i•-•..,•,... Drive. •• .i.,,.:---4.1!_•:ibc., - <.,,- ,--40.4•ec%-l• -7 •• • • •;.:-;:-...;/A•icvx.:2 ...•••.- -•- 4;•;..1:1i Z:' 2. Update the traffic signs!.Oontrol at the Intersection of Lake Washington ';:•,:—::,..:::;,:::I Boulevard and North Perk Drive. • L:11'.:41•41zZ.:.V.2.,..zi,••••••,:. . . . . ...• . 4.,;,::6-i•-,'•• : 3. improve the Intersection:of Burhett Avenue North WO LedsC;,410hiplitafi-• !-..t*Vc*...4.• •-i-., ..,-9-....:.:••••;"-• ..,•••••,?",•;••••.:-,;•- BOUlevskil,*-46i1dEdftioditte•left'turns across traffic id* . .;•,;:-:----;;e:,..-iii •". --c4k.: . p •,,,.-„, ..„ peopoi•daemoptsierst:- - • ., :.•••• . ..:...-::!:.:.,....z:... ,...• .• B. The:follOW101•10f4tePhOlIPZeltriet IsngtoOsenefAs Shell bi'111 *!' .. • ,.;•:,..1,-. . !6• i.vP0-- 5.1.4-41;t••: ,.:1,cir.;•: ,;:f:.;?,;.. • ..:?...:;':•:01.14 deeekepeemt— — pot*sieeued..bithei.City and are to be • . -.. .."fr4'0.3.7-Le : with the clevaiiiidifitif the site should suchilroalophilit.:' ' . ' , :. ..,-, ,,•1,4%.:c: •741 afiligkiiiit lif*A0*ited•brilhilltiti- Ma-aliPliessit!IV: ,.„.,• • ..7e-if.;:§k:•'a."•:;:, a Pailieltilat* it4taNeider.:-•deferral Of as if the.Wilik ie. • - .:with the thin•Ip011iiiigerdity.'izikies; • 'i•-•-te---Ar.••> . ' . :'"'',"*WA-4•:`±- ..„...%..k:-.-.0,..2.:. .. . C. Provide total cost for Installing the left turn lane appetite the eftteihnoolto the ' :.-.-. . , ,-,:;,.:.,..-,4•,....s.i.i., r)..s.---4Fi;•- . Lakeside site.' .-• •• ---v ±•,.--r-.; . •.:5':"7. •. ... ,. .4.10V-r...:, ...".7% ,t' „.4',: . • ::'' :''.- '. .'''' -. ,Z.... V:::::i i.,1 • Ail/ • • • _ . . ,• , _.-L__--• :- . • .••• •-..,- :. ....,.,..§.:„..i.4..,; ,,,,,- ... ,,..• • D. Provide off-sits,•Irni3r00011,e14 on Lake Washington BoulPV401i ..04.**.,Bus.9aKs,. , .- ::: .•:- .;. ..%.. ....:,....,Pos! .;;.:C?:. sidovielks, and Arigitlightkfcg.together with all nsceessociesOtantraat3ii kW' ..- the frontage cifr*liikeddi:Sti• . s., • •,ki),:•;.,:teil.,..-: .1 • r• .,...)46.2:, ' • . . •,, 31..,..40...? ,of-;.f-il-K44: E. Provide *holt suitecie. gr.evel-based temporary • ..-4 test in. • •--- . 4. V:Yr..c.• .= .. . from the siibiee:toaparty to the-ammo' a t Csis . „2,.,:4 .... ,.:.,tood.k.:,4.,....... s ..,.• . .,,!,:„...,....• . .. • .:.:4,-;-4. i?...0-A-,.: %-ii, ..,,,, -,A, - lacittid Mi.metaileain'eccaithiiioiCtilthi*e Ind ..., - , • - .... • 'Ir..'7''... ': •:•-;.;:11,:r- -,* ..,442...f.t. . y-x4vor-,..• • . ,-5-•.,- --: .----,...nse4-v 4- 'ift: '1. tt44440160"104 ';*. Fitlic'111(44114: _... ,••/41* 11* 4v*P.4-4tIn. ... :171X: :, - •-.*- • %•:itrA'i: •( •:...--,-.4„,.•- , •i•1449.4::04,:d., : =:00•fletigad7de*•041..: ;147iN;4024--,:•Al.. t4X141- -.Si•-••••; . ..4....i ..,,, • ,:. ..;tcf,e4, , $• -01_—a . ,. :0‘100.: ,40.•:.- . . ••.. -,i4t.it• .. ,.. ' •-- .5.",-42 V-4.7.,-;L..,,4i.:1.A1 .::f. • •• .:: * •.. . ' '''''&1 ‘-....•.- voilik‘iiiiCtiegloW1064'at'Mk:- :...'• ',,, . ' ' ...':,'.-011/0) `;‘,"-c•to.41•14,: ,Z.'v 'kid:,.', : . ......7 0- : 00444-14:146-10kiiiablital 01..gata*.• -'• •_• •A* • . • • , :.,,.i:-:: • •,;•:,...;•.•is .,,• • -:, .• • -t• wa-.-s..... •-•. ... •-:• . .,. ..-?0,*(.±.A14 5 .1:.•'.'4.1;.*.t.i.2 '• Orialiee that 1068"ekleviielk Istott.reeme*Vg.0* ... . • .,• ".,.. &tr. ••••• •---•,-1.'1:f. • eppncint.ts noCtiletilrierto dupneek.e ifillilogiireOlifeeett • • . . ..,.. .. - - .•••. • ,... .:,::. .7.1 . .. • . _, • ., . .4.' ..:.: ... . .. ir s: .4.1 ''• i•1! •••4::..''•ltir * ':. I ZI-: •• •ipti.......! ,... ,. ,,iaret,tvittzeN,54.k„1.1.:.;,,,.1 ,' .•''.• 4, 1'*N. ,lifi"• .."t":°:"" ,. Nekl.,4 ,..,4. ',,..-„, ..,5,146 1,.‘1,4,,,.....1. -,...1-3.s.tor...i.o.,..,, . , .•....r•ei• /it.At ..••- •1 ., , .,.• ,i.t• . •.. A:,. .5- .crit;):, ,....,, .. .. • .;,0„. • • • ,•;. , . , ,, . :.4 . -. ..v.,,j;/„.' .. , , :AA',,--4,21m, glt. ,i .0. .A .41` ' • • i , '' 10, .....4....eVI. - 4. ••1 .40‘40•t:•I • • ••• . ig:'Zql.i4Vti".1:.''Vtitj..-...4.t.r.'get%-4'4t•VV.P.• '.1 IN-11-,,,,-,,,y-y• [4,4,s ' t, I,/ .,.)./:- - - i,w, ••,.,....--:•-•:•,:e., :•,.,t-,4:. *.-.,. s.... ,itiogo,•.., :41%,p-- i ... .,, • ,. •, , ;.7,..,A„.ie,--,..„,, .r.,?..,=!_.,1-., --bz4.1,:•ei-if.-445r:74:4_,(4e..., 1.f. -11. .1,.....,-:..4,;4"./.,.,,ifm,;, itfi,A3,3 , f,„,,T-:,..,.,p1.:, ; .;gruil• ..,' N.,.! ?...,'.t•,.),•-„;.7 , .. •11.f.s,it.‘• .f-u.i,-`,.?..ii . , .•r 3, • 'v , ',.,•••',I'i.';:+1!`:'''';...;=i-VO.!;• ler*-ii....1h-0.•.. ,,,,,,eli.:. ,:-, '"..7.., •.,1,4; g.4-;,J.:q,;.e(1,....501....:iii.k.s,.* ,:•,,.41•.,.4.., 41":,,,,/,;, .1.. 'i,t4'V-...,'!1***,I'''',. li•'•.: ,t;*.:got',0- 1.7 ;IT*.''*I '.., '1 • ,:4- ' ? ' i!.• . ••,. • •1:•-4,..e,• 1,41.•X, ),t..._,E7. 4 411 ‘.. v. 1''...' :•••I,4,•; i i....IA•••.4';‘,V4.4.' ).i•• 1+•,,i,.!..,,,-;•.:'...601-',•.:•:,..,,,elis.14, pOrS..-4;.•"iw.., 1, I irk.''.-'X 4' .4 i...V. . e t'A.lk '..4 i . X.6,,,g,,. ,, ,....1.4"V,o, i ., . .. • ... . .'.:.'• ;:rt...r.:. ..>144.,‘•''.t.:,..ai,7„ , ItfLift.111,A141vil 1.14.1.:1,1;Yt•44k. ....‘';‘,*',. ,t4r,iffi.:.*:..;.;1:.*)',.:1; . 5.•?•1:1:''';•:•'.13,•:,Y4 lie,te!,f.i ''.:-3.1.1.\l'•,,.1',,11,1.fifli,561/i41.1iiilif! Igr..i'..,:.;,r 1,2.44....1 '9.4.4.)il. .i.''%?...,.;-. c,... :gijatHS.I.t.,:t?t,ifl....' , :;j.-.42,f;';;A:‘........•;%1?;“;!4;......*A.. •.• . ... r••' ---p. !0 .u....li 'tr.•••• Le A te,y'll-, -.,...,i... ;;.:0.•;?*:1 .1,•.-. ,•'„,i1,•3'.•,.!...: •... .41.4-(!„„;•••}yj....1.,rj• , i.it„••..,,T •,..:, .. ..,4!:, •1,0 T. ,„.. , • ,i 1 ,; Et it.., .v •-•,` •• •• it 1•N:a:,.•• • • •' * '..F.r •,4.4 f 4.1,.; 1•0...-.4 .,,),I.:1,:...,,,..r..-, -,•,..T:,..„2.: ,. ..,... i,.,,,,-,”i;,,.4.-,.4 i,, i.;=,..4•ixiLiiihiii,iNitailillgoijailaiiiiiiiiiia, V+ v 4,,..,, e.‘,,t. .''',' .. ,.•7, ,,,,,;;;;Q10 Zi..t.;.!,,,,;:!. );! *!- 1,,tp" , •i,''r.A;;•,,,tto,r1,' - •' •..- .-.,..*%. .• ;V,•,*.v..;?-•,.,--/, : q.141....-d•t••••,..•t-1-.-i",•,, - ......z., . ,.,...2.4..... „,..,,,b_.,...4.,,,b,‘ ' " -, • ' ... — • - .• • • . .R..Aav4o.6 • .i'l!-.4:•••••.2"‘":'•1• i,.. --:,.4.-r!•-"'t .:-..0""tt....•• •kt,..ty,,..4, . • - . • -'.•*i . ' • ..• ....m.4,7 :. ,.7.%'.. Y!•••."."*.• ..y•."ii, '6,:44't•''''.*.I'Ve;:.'''':.1.^4'4^ VII' '. • ' t ''• '-'-' ' . ',(-N 0:--4".'',..i.ti: :?- - 4.y•-. . . . • • • '0'. •-:; . =-.' --..,,,-,,..6 ,,:-'4,.., -;;:i • . . . • . . ' . . . • .' . ..., .. . -.. : -. •• . ' ,-, ••-. . 11171. ----. 4/'15 . • r.:•,. IS . . .."" . 1 ' l'' •5 I ,ct 'V • :: • .. . g.„1. g 3.. .... , 1.1- 1.A:.. .... 1 • I:I iv• 1 1 VIII;..zi 3 ....._ ' liit 4:ra! • lit] I 1 0. li/11 likt I 3 ei • S .i 1 8 •-- I ]ilg... ' 1 • ... -.. . ..)r1 it ..:1;%' • W WO... . • •1. t 0 Pa t 1 : .. ...- .• • .. .1. • 4,0 .Iii,..c... . . is,....-, 1.,..IR . 'St 't.11 441 ill • ...t.a 11...V:I •••_.. r 45 X4 ' !lag!' x . : Ti jli • • • 0. 0. • . • •. . . . .. . . sssozrzycs • • . . . • .....: ..,.. :, ,.. ••••• • -:. •••,.......•.:ii•-•;. .i.i..;,.,.. ;.;.,.......-•.•'''...71.44.CL•."4'• '• '''' '.'•• '•:':.,,•. - , '''..4, '.':..4 -••• '.,,•:.•'•••r. ••• .. • - •. . ' * ** * " "„xy•k•'!•-...;.?.,'ts.!:i„,-4'...,.. ..':.*„;• :.:-.7:-..:" .•.• .. . •. ,,....,: ita.;:s.t.,..:-... t....-. .,--•• t.• -1-....:..•.-,. ,.• • • •. . :• '•• ••• ell.....4.1,010,;•ar,,,, ?-,. .,-1 ,r: . ...s,.:?1,61hrr• •..•..ct,•....,;.:.':-.•. •,..,•.,,-,...•; :. ••.. .., , . •• . ... . .. •, . •• •:• ,-'i.Os't..,ar:`%,r.a'.Y. .k-N ...• • • ••• . IC ILMET APPROVED iv COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT PLA^iNIi. CITY OF RENTON Date MAR 2 2 2000 RECEIVED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT March 16,2000 Removal of Restrictive Covenants—Tamaron Pointe Apartments (March 13, 2000) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence with staff recommendation to authorize the removal of restrictive covenants that were required as a condition of the rezone of the subject property in 1983 from Trailer(T)to Residence(R-3). The covenants require: 1. Voluntary payment of $6,450 for speck traffic improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard. 2. Requirement for specific off-site public street improvements including: installation of a left turn lane opposite the entrance:to the Lakeside site; provision of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting and all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the Lakeside site;provision of asphalt surface temporary sidewalks from the property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Park;,tra, ccontrol (signage and striping)for pedestrians crossing Lake Washington Boulevard from the east to the west side near the north entrance to Coulon Park, provided•that the applicant would not be required to duplicate these improvements. 3. Requirement that no development of the project is to occur to the east of the toe of the slope as defined in the restrictive covenant. 4. Requirement that the number o dwellingunits proposed would be restricted to 187;provided, however, that in"the event of a oning hange to permit more units than 187, such zoning change would super-cede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. The covenants were required as a condition of rezoning of the property in 1983 (R-90-81). The restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development on the site. The covenants are no longer relevant as they have either.been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property. In addition, approval of the land use permits for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments further render the restrictive covenants unnecessary. • • tampdc\ Ack4MDP•rr 3 . • • March 20,2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 97 CARRIED. (See page 98 for ordinance.) EDNSP:Automall Overlay Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report District Amendments(Areas recommending that the Council set a public hearing for April 10,2000 to "A"and`B") consider amendments to Area"A"and Area`B"of the Automall Overlay District,and to Section 9-14-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of-way Vacations. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. 'mot Development Services: Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Tamaron Pointe Apts Removal recommending concurrence with the staff recommendation to authorize the of Restrictive Covenants(Lk removal of restrictive covenants that were required as a condition of the rezone of Wash Blvd),R-81-090 the Tamaron Pointe Apartments property in 1983 from Trailer(T)to Residential (R-3). The covenants require: 1. Voluntary payment of$6,450 for specific traffic improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard. 2. Requirement for specific off-site public street improvements including: installation of a left turn lane opposite the entrance to the lakeside site; provision of curbs,gutters,sidewalks,and street lighting and all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the lakeside site; provision of asphalt surface temporary sidewalks from the property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Park;traffic control(signage and striping) for pedestrians crossing Lake Washington Boulevard from the east to the west side near the north entrance to Coulon Park,provided that the applicant would not be required to duplicate these improvements. 3. Requirement that no development of the project is to occur to the east of the toe of the slope as defined in the restrictive covenants. 4. Requirement that the number of dwelling units proposed would be restricted to 187;provided,however,that in the event of a zoning change to permit more units than 187,such zoning change would supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. The covenants were required as a condition of rezoning of the property in 1983 (R-81-090). The restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development on the site. The covenants are no longer relevant as they have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property. In addition,approval of the land use permits for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments further render the restrictive covenants unnecessary. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance:Vouchers Payroll Vouchers 24534-24755,and 527 direct deposits totaling$983,404.44. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utility:Utility Shutoffs(City Councilman Parker announced that in 1993,at the request of then- Policy and Procedures) Councilmember Nancy Mathews,the City Council had referred the subject of enforcement of utility liens and related claims for damages to the Finance Committee. He felt that this subject would best be broached in Committee of the Whole so all Councilmembers could participate in the discussion and any .. TA MNr +CITY F RE T N Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 1, 2002 John Shenk Sobrato Development Co. #792 SI VI, LLC 10600 North De Anza Blvd. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Rescission of Restrictive Covenants #8312120558 Alexan Multi Family Residential Development 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N., Renton City Land Use File #LUA98-123' - Dear Mr. Shenk: This letter is to advise you that the City intends to finalize the rescission of the above-referenced restrictive covenants. We found after researching our files that it was clearly the City Council's intent to rescind these covenants in May of 2000 (see attached recorded Release of Restrictive Covenants document recorded under King County recording number 20000522001420). I have enclosed a copy of a City Council Planning and Development Committee report indicating the Council's intent to eliminate the covenants. Unfortunately, the Release of Restrictive Covenants document actually filed by the City did not accomplish the Council's intent as it inadvertently referenced a previous version of the covenants (#8312050533) and did not extinguish the current version of the covenants in question. In order to rectify this situation, Development Services staff will immediately begin work processing a corrected version of the "Release of Covenants" document and will ensure that it is recorded with King County. This process should take approximately 2-3 weeks. Please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7294 with any questions you may have about this letter. Sincerely, Laureen Nicolay Senior Planner, Development Services Division enclosures cc: Michael Collins, Trammel Crow Residential Douglas L. Daley, Trammel Crow Residential Jennifer Henning City Land Use File #LUA98-123 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 This oa,ar coma n recycled"later al 20%ons!consumer TACIA PMN T' Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 0111111111111111111111111111 20000522001420 CITY OF RENTON R 9.00 PAGE 001 OF 002 05/22/2000 14:31 KING COUNTY, WA rOX-Cel. iytiG(7YrCci� 1"`""""„ _RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Property Tax Parcel Numbe 229650-200 Project File#: R-090-081(Lake Terrace Park Associates Street Intersection: 2100 Lake Washin on-Eou evard Rezone) North Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton 1. Alex Cugini,Jr.,J.Steve Harer LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M,.in King County,Washington,lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard;except that portion platted as Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;together with that cv portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law. oParcel B: Lots 39,40,and 41,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under h• r Auditor's File No. 1020457;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 1001'Street(formerly known as Mildred N Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law,together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under Lin City of Renton Ordinance No.3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. o Parcel C: That portion of Lot 28,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot,distant being 122 Q o feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot,being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would c-' attach to said o byoperation of law. property P� Parcel D: Lot 27,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King county, Washington;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No.3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel E: That portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,WM,in King County,Washington,described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning;thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27,Eldon Acres,with the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5:thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden,Division No.5,according to the plat recorded inVolume 11 of Plats,page 83,in King County,Washington;thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning;thence North to the true point of beginning;except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right-of-way(200 feet in width)of Pacific Coast Railroad Company. Whereas the Grantee,as named above,is the holder of a restrictive cov cquired from the above named Grantor dated December 12,1983 and recorded under Recording Numbe 831205053 1f King County,State of Washington; and L Incocrr.0 recor�� j rF ..d ACe, WHEREAS,the City of Renton,Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1983;and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development of the site;and, WHEREAS;said restrictive covenants applied to the then current zoning;and, WHEREAS,the zoning of this site has subsequently changed;and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property;and, WHEREAS,the City Council authorized the removal of the restrictive covenants on March 20,2000; NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby authorize the release of the restrictive covenants described above on the land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said City has caused this instrument to be executed this/((day of 20 ee . 0.,.;g wlv,7,4., ,k oF R .,t,'/ii City of Renton I- � d700.44., z SL _ Jesse er,Mayor ••• ,CD Dhiit:ti vdk i�i111 irimiti mtn����� Marilyn Pet•u" ty Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Je55G Tit n n c t- and nf-,�,/n Pe,I e Y9-AA. signed this instrument and ." ; -`• acknowledg d that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and s .t g,/ ,, acknowledged it as the IYt&\I or and OA U.f4tV- 9/ -. - _ of Cal�+ p{ _VPJt1.�',SYt ' to be the free and voluntary of such t` ;4,<« EX{Y A;c,' party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument . 0- " 4 k3z 4.'Sr4 ! Notary Public in an for the State of Washington :�'•` 't Notary(Print) Mifi'iG�� Ne,R, 1 � �r �►�'� AY1V� . ` '' ' f r My appointment expires: 91111 200 1 Dated: 11 S 17/19" 1 2 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Property Tax Parcel Number: 229650- 2000 Project File#: R-090-081 (Lake Terrace Park Associates Street Intersection:2100 Lake Washington Rezone) Boulevard North Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton 1. Tamaron Pointe Lp LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in King County,Washington, lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard;except that portion platted as Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 86,in King County,Washington;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100`h Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attach byoperation of law. Parcel B: Lots 39,40, and 41, Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 86, in King County,Washington;except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 1020457;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel C: That portion of Lot 28, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, in King County,Washington lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot, distant being 122 feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot, being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel D: Lot 27, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 86, in King County,Washington;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel E: That portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in King County,Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, in King County,Washington;thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning; thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27, Eldon Acres,with the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5:thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, in King County,Washington;thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning; thence North to the true point of beginning; except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right- of-way(200 feet in width) of Pacific Coast Railroad Company. Whereas the Grantee, as named above, is the holder of a restrictive covenant acquired from the above named Grantor dated December 12, 1983 and recorded under Recording Number 8312120558 of King County, State of Washington; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton,Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1983;and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development of the site; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants applied to the then current zoning; and, WHEREAS, the zoning of this site has subsequently changed; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property; and, WHEREAS,the City Council authorized the removal of the restrictive covenants on March 20, 2000; NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby authorize the release of the restrictive covenants described above on the land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said City has caused this instrument to be executed this day of 20 City of Renton Jesse Tanner, Mayor Bonnie Walton,City Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that and signed this instrument and acknowledged that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: CITY „F RENTON ..LL "_ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator .,:.. March 1, 2002 John Shenk Sobrato Development Co. #792 SI VI, LLC 10600 North De Anza Blvd. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Rescission of Restrictive Covenants #8312120558 Alexan Multi Family Residential Development 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N., Renton City Land Use File#LUA98-123 Dear Mr. Shenk: This letter is to advise you that the City intends to finalize the rescission of the above-referenced restrictive covenants. We found after researching our files that it was clearly the City Council's intent to rescind these covenants in May of 2000 (see attached recorded Release of Restrictive Covenants document recorded under King County recording number 20000522001420). I have enclosed a copy of a City Council Planning and Development Committee report indicating the Council's intent to eliminate the covenants. Unfortunately, the Release of Restrictive Covenants document actually filed by the City did not accomplish the Council's intent as it inadvertently referenced a previous version of the covenants (#8312050533) and did not extinguish the current version of the covenants in question. In order to rectify this situation, Development Services staff will immediately begin work processing a corrected version of the "Release of Covenants" document and will ensure that it is recorded with King County. This process should take approximately 2-3 weeks. Please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7294 with any questions you may have about this letter. Sincerely, Laureen Nicolay Senior Planner, Development Services Division enclosures cc: Michael Collins, Trammel Crow Residential Douglas L. Daley, Trammel Crow Residential Jennifer Henning City Land Use File#LUA98-123 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 1 this oao-r rnaF.^5r..1 J!19.,nnct nnnm inic. TCR Douglas L.Daley Chief Financial Officer TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL West Coast Group 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland,WA 98033-7866 (425)828-3003 FAX(425)828-0904 CITY OF RENTON email: ddaley@tcresidential.com RECEIVED FEB 2 2 2002 BUILDING DIVISION February 20, 2002 / �P0 4 4-4_40i"9 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Renton,WA 98055 Re: Alexan Lake Washington Notice of Boundary Line Agreement Gentlemen: We are in the process of selling our Alexan Lake Washington apartment community located in Renton, Washington. The Buyer(Sobrato Development Company)has requested written confirmation from the City of Renton that the terms and conditions as stated in the Notice of Boundary Line Agreement have been met and that no further obligations are outstanding. For your convenience I have prepared a draft form of letter for your review. If the form of this letter is acceptable,please re-type on City of Renton letterhead,sign and return the original to my attention. I will forward this on to the Buyer for their records. Please feel free to give me a call should you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, Dou as L.Daley DLD/kb G:\SEA\SEA_DEV\Seattle\TCR Projects\Complete Deals\TamaronPoint\LETTERS\City of Renton,Boundary Line.doc to , ... CITY 05F RENTON .alt Office of the City Attorney e Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT NT PLANNIN t RENTON MAR 19 2002 To: Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner R L, IVED From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: March 18, 2002 Subject: Grantee's Block on Release of Restrictive Covenants You forwarded to me a release of restrictive covenants on the Lake Terrace Park Associates property and noted that the original grantors of the restrictive covenants, Alex Cugini Jr. and J. Steve Harer, are no longer the owners of the property and wondered whose names should be filled in the grantees box. I see two ways of proceeding. The first way of proceeding is to eliminate the grantor/grantee box all together and refer to the City of Renton in the body of the release rather than using grantee. That way the document would be a release of restrictive covenants no matter who owns the property. The second way of proceeding is to find out the name of the current owner of the property and use that as the grantees name. The Development Services Division should have the current name. Sue Carlson might also have that name. Either way of proceeding would appear fine to me. awrence J. W en LJW:tmj cc: Jay Covington Sue Carlson Neil Watts T10.34:15 Post Office Box 626-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)255-8678/FAX(425)255-5474 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE Thies nanar mntainc 5trvcorl l material 30%nnct rnnsumer 1%re � � CITY k_RF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator �. .: March 1, 2002 John Shenk Sobrato Development Co. #792 SI VI, LLC 10600 North De Anza Blvd. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Rescission of Restrictive Covenants#8312120558 Alexan Multi Family Residential Development 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N., Renton City Land Use File#LUA98-123 Dear Mr. Shenk: This letter is to advise you that the City intends to finalize the rescission of the above-referenced restrictive covenants. We found after researching our files that it was clearly the City Council's intent to rescind these covenants in May of 2000 (see attached recorded Release of Restrictive Covenants document recorded under King County recording number 20000522001420). I have enclosed a copy of a City Council Planning and Development Committee report indicating the Council's intent to eliminate the covenants. Unfortunately, the Release of Restrictive Covenants document actually filed by the City did not accomplish the Council's intent as it inadvertently referenced a previous version of the covenants (#8312050533) and did not extinguish the current version of the covenants in question. In order to rectify this situation, Development Services staff will immediately begin work processing a corrected version of the "Release of Covenants" document and will ensure that it is recorded with King County. This process should take approximately 2-3 weeks. Please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7294 with any questions you may have about this letter. Sincerely, Laureen Nicolay Senior Planner, Development Services Division enclosures cc: Michael Collins, Trammel Crow Residential Douglas L. Daley, Trammel Crow Residential Jennifer Henning City Land Use File #LUA98-123 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 TCR Douglas L.Daley Chief Financial Officer TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL West Coast Group 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland, 98033-7866 CITY 42 828-3003 RECEIVED FAX(425)828-0904 email: ddaley@tcresidential.com FEB 2 2 2002 BUILDING DIVISION February 20, 2002 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Renton,WA 98055 Re: Alexan Lake Washington Declaration of Native Growth Protection Restriction Gentlemen: We are in the process of selling our Alexan Lake Washington apartment community located in Renton, Washington. The Buyer(Sobrato Development Company)has requested written confirmation from the City of Renton that the terms and conditions as stated in the Declaration of Native Growth Protection Restriction have been met and that no further obligations are outstanding. For your convenience I have prepared a draft form of letter for your review. If the form of this letter is acceptable,please re-type on City of Renton letterhead, sign and return the original to my attention. I will forward this on to the Buyer for their records. Please feel free to give me a call should you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, ill‘/ Doug 7L.Daley DLD/kb G:\SEA\SEA_DEV\Seattle\TCR Projects\Complete Deals\TamaronPoint\LETTERS\City of Renton,Native Growth.doc CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 19, 2002 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: Laureen Nicolay, Development Services Division, #7294 SUB T: Correction of Recorded Document Removal of Restrictive Covenants for The Alexan (formerly Tamaron)Apartments City Land Use File#LUA98-123 and City Rezone File#R-090-81 A title report recently obtained for the above-referenced property indicates that covenants the City Council intended to rescind in 2000 (documentation attached) are actually still in effect due to an error in the recorded rescission document. I have attached a copy of my March 1st letter to the purchaser of the development, Sobrato Development, which further explains the issue. In order to remove the restrictions from the property's title as intended by the Council, we need to re- record a corrected version of the"Removal of Restrictive Covenants"document previously signed by the Mayor in order reference the correct recording number. Once the Mayor has signed, will you please forward the document by mail for recording with King County? The County recording fees for this recording should be charged to#000/07.532.22.49.14. When your office receives the recorded document back from the County, could you please place copies in both the above-referenced files and also forward a copy to: John Shenk Sobrato Development Co. #792 SI VI, LLC 10600 North De Anza Blvd. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014 Thank you for your assistance. Please call me at X-7294 if you have any questions. Attachment 1: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants to be rescinded (#8312120558) Attachment 2: March 16, 2000 P & D Committee Report recommending approval of covenant removal Attachment 3: March 20, 2000 Council Minutes approval removal of covenants Attachment 4: March 1, 2002 letter to Sobrato Development explaining history of covenant removal efforts Attachment 5: Initial Release Document(#20000522001420) to be amended Attachment 6: Corrected Release of Covenants Document which references the correct recording number of the covenants to be rescinded cc: Jennifer Henning • . ri t.-f MEAT 1 - THIS IS A CORRECTION DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS TO •----+. CORRECT LEGAT 'SCRIPTION OF THAT CERTAIN COV!SW RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECOR - NO. 8312050533 t DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 1 • RECORDED 111S DAYWHEREAS, Lake Terrace Park Associates is the owner of tM �' 'rnM 13 ',:' ' V property In the City of Renton. County of King.State of Washington. ON 0 ••lt.�.` "A" 83/12/11,0. .1S R.1:1� A ,: - • i A attached hereto. RECD F h"+sCOON1 Y •r y� • CASHSL •Mw.+k,�$.00 =,%1 F. : N • :v at-4: WHEREAS. the owr>er(s) of said described property desire to impose the following • `�,' a Vrestrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above :>'. described real property. ^"'�; • . : NOW. THEREFORE. the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish. want and'knpose•. •• :: .:: f ER • restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect-to the '" • •.. use by the undersigned,their successors.heirs and assigns.as follows: A. Prior. to.prtrl[cation of the .rezone ordinance for application R-090-81,..the • Y a shall :provide.it t s :provide a total of$6,450.:as a voluntary payment to.thti::Citjr of ; r Renton, whldi funrd'shall constitute the total contribution and shall be.wad; a t:Audvoely for.the'traffic improvements and associated work Identified In.41. 't.t`• I r. 2.rind 3•beloW ` '3. .} 1. Widen 800.ilneal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approadmately 9 to l0 " 1 feet.between.Perk Drive and.Houser Way to widen BOO lineal feet of Lake fir,1t= Washington Boulevard at its approach to the intersection of-North Park 2. Update the traffic signal control at the intersection of Lake Washington ° -• ' - 1. �•` ''` Boulevard and North Parkk Drive. :j `'-` • 'h'=�•%r :t'", 3. Improve_the k*ersactlon of Burnett Avenue oral oOd a cs ..r it ':y��;�y!": BOuievarl't'ti • 'left•turns across traffic eotithhclli d (4lw -_ "r.:' ��y.^!:� • .r�;' ,.�. .•iii B. The.fallowing ailt-sib11 ptbltc etrlet inntpe wn nts shall fie N• c "" hsued by_the.:City and era to lea t '`'r; :r: ` :q d} r', 'v b sM ar Of the.ate tlmuld auth cis lop :7-?`z Vic.}. `1.-- t Z ,;1;. appficaid add by:ths;•City% lea-apphc wf m�;i� 'Y :; ';•- of pli6iid:M�a di ir.a deferral of any oY the iriodi in .with • 1 :: - the than•appii 'C ►caidsa.. • . .,f 27Ax ' C. Provids total coot for installing the loft tarn lane apposite the afitrar to the :,i,Y_,, Lakas{de alto.' �: : : O. Provide off-site Impeovaraants on Lake WashingtonBorianrnicci. Cutts. . • ` Vf , ,' :•` sidewalks, and att+ailt 1t¢ntbig..together with all rwoeessty>M lif4iir. • : .. � - f the frarntage d Mt llikedafi Mts. '2 F E. Provide asphalt surfeoe. growl�e�aeyd_ttaa�n por yy �s 41w41 tr'6 tiat.: 1. •• - r. .` ` 0• ?-v. front the �pR��tY to the R ss a of ens .i.,:,;1 t x •!Isk4 • •s3c t`i..— •.� ,7� r, IOOatanl add I�1`taDaa'In•aC urdan os with pia s and ` •',•. ..Y's. ' the .O �' .'h t .ram,��a: � , �,f;i, R • mot' '• • .• n +" . i, 7r=�F'¢ • • • q k .`+t Vint- lit the rt. • 'irlt �,ie.4.e t.. �1,� IR+ehil. ,audit pa aOMttni to cal ( : � •yx r t,v r F,� Y : beat wolf WO Y�i L ` �w+ Awt:,>24 1 a�ppik_nt•is ndt•t�agaiei to dye i �r i ... : - - THIS IS __ _ORRECTION DECLARATION OF RESTRIC I COVENANTS TO " —�, CORRECT LEGAT !SCRIPTION OF THAT CERTAIN COVER' RECORDED UNDER ICING COUNTY RECGR NO. 8312050533 • i DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS RECORDED 1 IAS DAY WHEREAS, Lake Terrace Perk Associates is the owner of the ' titllllM'�3 property in the City of Renton. County of King. State of Washington. ON DF li , �;%;-•• 'A"attached hereto. 83ri2i32ic,°rCrS RFil�:,It `3 A• :"�'{y > RECo F tv`�50t)X1NlY ^�. ;;� CASHSL ****'5.00 " k 22 '....'• ' • • • • 0 WHEREAS, the Owners of said described property desire to i ;',q;y �j: : rlrl restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above • Y., described real property. � -Y f. owner(s) hereby establish, grant and Sn1p0e4. • �• NOW THEREFORE, the aforesaid •:__:, restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to tine use by the undersigned.their suds.heirs and assigns,as follows: • A. Prior to puhlicatibn of the .rezone ordinance for application R-090-81,. the 1,-.:..,..,:,i,....,.;: ` applicant shall,provide a total of $6,450•aas a voluntary payment.to.ths: ity;of. Rental, hid1 'hind shall Constitute the total contribution. and shall�be.used .. .; -.• exclusively fir the traffic improvements and associated wo ic.•Identified In`:41. • `''+ } .• 2.and 3'beiow:' • - $ .?'. • ` = 1. Widen 800.lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 -:•.-...:::.,..,, feet between.Perk Drive'and.Houser Way to widen 800 lineal feet of Lake 54 ,; •-• •; `:.'' Washington'Boulevard at its approach to the intersection of North Park i . 2. Update the traffic signal .control at the Intersection of Lake Washington _ ~ ai Boulevard and North Perk Drive. '' _h'� 3. Improve the interevttion of Burnett Avenue North.end t.iiee _. .;`4%-4 -`• BaAsva�kt*COre iodite'left turns across tr'a ic•Weitl kriill'ti�l�tiliIL '• .� fir.}' .-. .. • • C•. .! : x B. The following efT-tibF public street lmprowrr s shell:he,,e} t'r. VI-1.z, , ' • by. City and are to be • _ - ••:ssued the:. ''-swith bf t�h{e�..,s��itte.should suds daveloop - r l• • app ,a t arrd by t ig City 'TM-appOOUtt m '# ui t:- d :..5,1 •, ' : 4` of Plfi -�tOiiitio i.-a deferral of any of the blk inwith ., '!'`"e< ; ' - the then s pplk Ih '':Ctty cede.: h'7 E,;s 3.�{V's • x• .-lf� - C. Provide total cost�' the the . . . . ;r M, Installing loft turn lane opposite afSt�M `11.�:b0 the r,. •. I'A--‘,...., Lalcs slde dte. � • .�•., D. Provide off-sits impcovemt ants on Lake WaiNngtan Baulevsrd, wtbs. rs, s: -; . ,�. . ' t`'•ate .,; • idewelks.and:el Bet lighting..together with all necese i-y 1tt•, ,. ,�t''�L the trar�t.g.d tl*L ksaide iiE.. :;� �,` 1`�,. E. Provide asphsllt sur f.cs, gravel-baled tanppr�srp • 6 tssR .ln • ,� �•. from the s.t)*ct pe�opett to the-intranos al owes • c• ' .? �, boated and le msU d:fn•yoccortbilofi-wh.plans and , • ,�,r • t'"`,-: ':,� the .Dipirbris;st ref' .fir, ;Ws.k*, s d and .•,'sue, T irlidts iti t iltilrltitil .0. 'fa a-1 �*%.'". ` �; • ,y`ilniftesa y�y��,yam ,` 'Yak �M seic COMM tts edPti*. ..., !,. ' '.. •!k+`:tdb• .1..,a '.„i ri .., .4.. . ., :,• ,,,,,-•,•.,.•,1',"•11,;') , •' / .81 .' ' :' • •• './.';‘t 'idti4Sile; .. 1 14 .,':i, . 0 1,: .1.... 7,1,11. ..:i'A ,,4; 4 '4.403.4,41 lit, V., , t ' '' 0••-• ,•?:.• td;V/ VA' ' /r 'op i' 41 ' :,:-,3-x.:7. .,'a#,,,:::;;;: 1,;',If::"..,'"i't,,-ts. ' vit...,0.34::.0s...,>:! r ,...., , f, ;,i, , _ . It 1?, : , • ' '' ''• '' ' • 7 -';' ' -- '''• - •,' •f1S3W•44gAci;';V.!'t-i;4:,.A,),,s,F,:),••:;'),,, Cst .',/,, - ?,1,-.:,tAs(V..); ,t Apztk.,,,,,!4.d.1.., ,, , i:4, ,., I.,.,.; ,.,, .*,,,, .. 40. t4 . , . , ;, ,. 44, '4, 'f,',V7P.:14...*:::SiCI•ji,,kst"V'',64' 4:; t..,'`.:.!Ii•-4,1-v.k4,' ''..1 ' .0'1?.a•Vs,Ilk•‘;•'•'.',.f.70,v• ••*!•'.:•••:11.;:11)A.)'...6 •:,'.ftgi:*4,,,,,,,,•,r4',",•Vizi#i 4"':‘ 4, 4.P. °4;% ' .14'I ' ''A'w -‘11 .. iv i' '' ' " 4' ' . • ,.i. * 4.•••.: %,... .-46.-i 4 ., .• • * 1. 1 -'..i". •ir:':;;Y'f ,'4.„,,,,4•4•4,44.-tte,1,,-,...• .!,'-:-... ....,.;7..,-,!..- ,-i,......„1. 4 ..ti„ 4i ,:,:::.,n:... -11::,.i4+''.. c;•:;•,-.9Y';!.' .".%;,,;F-02.,,,,,"die, otA.401K,i,\,, 1„ i.1 i, .• , , 44 4 , ,;;,,..•_ ,..b. ) • : 11 '• ''''',..!.. .•:•.' "••• ,' 7•-•4;11•,'+IT? 4r,..s....:',..•,"':'-/--- •IIP•iitsN'*"j'.TC.-41,..'" sflt 1 • ". . r . ''::',7--;5,5•I'Vitit, ''trY.:;',-• *TIP li4NV‘"4-it''''?.... 4/I- '''' ' ;I; ;1••••• • '' '4 '-•^...i.4;41'T. '4' ' I'. ' • % •e" '''.'1,, e...'''.1.,: _. L., ',.i,.' 4,•f,,S. 7,..1 .1,S.:,‘, tel 1. f '..,:i.4,' '.• ' .•.: •,Y.- •!.,',;.e". . Ar_i,,,'44,..',2AC.14...,,•:-''',4,pA'404.te 14 w-: . ?•"rs.1.:?-'41'.1-.-' 4 •Vrit74,s-‘.. •:;L't ; -: '.'I 4 , ,, .,-,. .,,„ ...... , .,..„....,„ „ AA,'y,.155.,.•.,.,:p!:. 4.,...-:2 v,..T,...:1.,; s.4, f. .., •f" r,. t'..,;.,!' , ...:41,', .,0.'ti*:$f.'. t';,..,24.,,,tt'sra;FL.:, -./..; t„. q!.,4:',.jcf, .,N,.. ,_,,1"4,,.. • • ,.. ,i .,... ;.4,,,, , I.,- .: ';':r.AIS V V:11..'f;''.-; f:*'. .-:. 7:t.;:,it4Pi:Z.r:'-.:" ,.', ..,'. , ."....:'_:. ',...,:.;: ' ..',•,,:,':" ...-.:''''-.f.'s.'Si .:.;-1.."..,,i1;:y'r '.17/ ';',.:' 4.$,' .A,I.,--.4.,..; , , .4`,1,1'i i,304.g.4f !' -eu %-..,0 , -•- ”:;:r.'„ •c-4.".";::..!..,-t.:'.t ".:,..,',. g 4.',..)..j'':.'0.:''t: ' • ,;.:.;. ;.. '-",';''. :V:.,A,..:•:Pt4...)1,:;,:t: •-:1.3. 1'..1 ". 4;.,",•.:' •••••• ;., .r.• ',41.1.W:PliP;'..:. ;?•:.' .1114.14 .'41';‘:.:4,1!i":"I.LL•:;t: ., ••%.,••'•:.;...-r- - :. ..„ ,,,,,...4.,.... ..,,,, .i:',.:17,"„i.,-;(,":1;=re,--.:„..::- ...... ___ ...........,:—........- - - .....,. .:..:. ' .....:* ..7'''t•.t,''',...,,t,',:-:.•_;';•;6.•..f. 3';:!-,,!- •.),,').;'Y. -: .,T). ,,,.' , 4,A,,k,...•4•,:, • 7, ' • ' .. :• ' -. • ,0 %•mg 15 °. '• I .... n; 1 g I s 4 Cto 15 3 , 1 1 h . 0 j 1 .g. i 1 ''. is s K 1.1 4 I a ..* • IS. en I I es 14 1 I i I . : . V a• .t • Iiii. I , ". ...., a A re i i‘ 2 •6 1 g 1 .1 ,.. 1 R .ii 4. Iii lie 11 1:ill 1 g 1 „A., gr 1 0 1 1 . k 111 v II'— i' . . .... I 4 A 15 i /IS Ne 11. . : . 1 • 1/ s i I ; I * a 1 .3 .., i I j a 8 w In A .. i 1 5111 1 I--/ 1 g 1 g, • ... gH .. . 1 I 1 1 .:k. 1 I .t 1 1 s P.I M • 31 I I g • Ai iff 11 liAl 1 ":1` : i 1 t 1 1;11 : 5 i I 1 1 .. .,,,, tii . II! jilill :II 1 15 if ......... gli ;1 • vt , ... .. 11 jil : J-il I b II • 15,) ,1, 11111 illi 1 11j... ... 1 kl 1 1 I I I,i,. . 6 biro .• ' IP. tot , X li • . 11 kiti, - . '. •••4/•.1.44, %. 1 t4:14)%slis4iii...4 . .. . • ; . LI: 13 6 15 .?...t •., .1.. , . : • . . . • , 4 1l :. I, .. ..........- •\ Aiii -,,, 4' •? 1_1,011 . ., ut••;, . • iiggealaget 1 ' ,. . .pr • r,. _ ., 4-----0-•••.-- 4 ,7-71:7.„- •: -,‘,ei:....,...L.g-s,. .... - .."'i;ii,,‘-0, -.,,,..' ' ',' • ' '‘%, • ..: +,.,..., •.-, . . , s r .''-', t . 000 tit,1:1..1 1147‘441:ff ' '"Cs• . W'j, 4{` v '{ .... .\.% • • 5.0.iirsqo 4 ..,. .-.1 ..t. , , .., „ ,..,,,,,..i,./1,, , . ,. ., , .., . ,_f . , . •, I,:A•1:.et St"..4 I ...).:4.74'44%..1 . . t, „..,, . -.0 .. ' C•. •• ::...iies!.,4,1•• .•'•l• ••.1.;,; • . .......4i 1.... ••,... .." ' 't'''''6. • "1,)f-' .4 ••".', , ' i '1 ••.‘Viir L.„1%*• ‘f.'!'t 0 ape . 4 • ......4 ., % • •.•:••• .e.• .tti.e.m • !,.&„:,....,:14, •.....14.....*„.• ..,. .....0.:-.-..-.46...v,...t.31,tte;. .•:• -r+.1i.:.1.f•,-9,r.s -. -t4,,,caz.....-t ... 4. r....--,%. .... ..h......:e..,.. F.:.,:::/gi' vi,......-,,..,,,A--5,4.--t .orr• ,..se.;..,:5:1%,,,,„,g., . _ k.'- .' x' ' ' 4.101• ' et' i '•'....,.•.4/6,'r.:41:4.1; ...1,'.7.• • :4 ..,t •'Sr•i,‘ ,...-... i '.1g .1 '•••• • 111.-• • .tc„..:.,........r..!wr:- ,..,,,.,,.. ,._.•,....441:41.0-0/4-4.:......1.•: ,:,'' v el, . ...AI•. ..t.t."-');W i • ' . . -.• . ., , ,z1. r .-.,:.;.•.,0,tf.-',1)::.:,' ,..-ziT);,,I '4,_:,!..":;i4t„--s..1,431a•i'... ‘• ...i. . '''.• .,41 •,•;1;,il.ct.1 i f. li47 ,4.•°•'••.;.,.1'./0::,it'iit f• 1. ; .- „g: . '‘'••••'.. ',.:.'.;;;.#•;:•-ti• '*:. ••1:• lit•3; .f.Z71-.•;••'•.;•1"- ., .3 ..;4Ie' it '''s • •—: . •..... '. `..',•'...!3;4;.. f4fi, .*,,,..:VAg'44.. N--'t; '-4.. f-:; 1.,i,.•.i',.1 i ,c',:f vv,i14 1, -..-irk..,:,.'..',...1.4.4w ot,t1I- 1. ‘,1,44..1.., . .. . ....' .Ptfr.. ,,,,,,i- 1,...-- .,.lej-,.,. ut,,0-- .1 .,4 ..,,,k....,..• .t#,4.;›,,,,. .N. .. -,*.,,,ci li;;,-,pm. i•..0•,,tv:., f., i,,tift,-„s e. ;a,,' . 0,..€: X.A;*, I: ,":1. t.. ''.. . "t• i .,i '4,4: .• '-=•:(,'4: •• • • . ..• ''''s' •"'3*.,••••17:,‘.. ''''''. ' 4/...:74T,.7,08,11.1.;'' ...to,•Ze:•i•d•?,:;;;(!..:.:'/'.•;.: .:2,Z2i...!.1,4.1",:lf. '•;/..k.;14‘24Ff',4•••7410•04.1c; .,•:••••• .?‘.1).,, ,) ..,4 .i.; . e- ge.,..,, .„(ep,;•••' •• . ••:-- :.,•,„t„4,1114.ti.':',,;•:!•-•-•?:, • • :.:.!•s ,,,,,' i".",t'•<tAB-irt•r•, t.:fk?.74402:1'aC,Z1,t1". ...r::-••4-11 •:.;.,...' 31:'::•lii...tv.:"•'•i'.. *•:••-4.3.4isitabialI • mi, e'•11!..'..4 's.". ", 4 4 4trtiS02:4.1:4•ZI 1. ..ee:•.:.I •••••••"1,•••": :i • - :.'. , :fel.,•,,•:;.•.• ,•4,0•44 4.,,,.. • ' ....• ••••• ......,.. . . . •'... .. . • •'" '..''' ' • -- • "I''' ••••S•••'•4..`i:!,tA..••..1,k• • . . . • . . , • • . • ".• •+.,i'., '". ,•-• 'a''': e"„.;`,1•,, -^r: . • . : . -• • . . ' • • ..• .. . . . .. . . . . . • .. • •. • I,. -,.#. 1-1:. ... %., 1.: 1. • " • „r: .1 . S ll'a •at 1 a s 2 i all ii.1 I- l•li A il .7414. 1,:- - 1 1 .1 . : ..3• . > *:.11-I 1 lo164: 1 • ..1 . i 4 16 bIlla „E.,,r7, 1 Mtiii 6 il -§11 s - 1 .7 O.Z-• • . O. O. . . • .. .• • • , •. . - • . 9SSOZIZTES • . . -•:,.,. ,..‘:, % •....I ',• • • •-: ,-,-:-.. •••V• •• •-•''- •e'' " ••-`-"" .•• •• . -. •••••.—•;•T• ,.L.4,.,,,,,.,,--.4.••••:-.•.•:•-.111.-_T.-;•,.r,,..-.••!•.,(.......?...-.-•1:,-..:.•,...•--•,-,.....••-•-:' •••••1 :;;••`•;•••••••' .• .' 4 • 7 .,. .: , . ..:4•..,:.•i i 1%. •, +..„,4..;••.••••%•L•.,...tii:t,gy.rt.4.zfbr tit•s4.•‘•t4•:e:.,....,..•N.,•-.;.-3,,4V%4..i:.•W....•-;4,i....Ai.:%. r4•iZ..:t:f:4':.,.•..:..s-..•.4.,:•'f,;Av:.•t,..:.•.•..„•.••.•.•.•:.!•••.••.•..•..•;,,.•..,•.,.•:. •.: • . - ; . .. • .. . -.. MT# A4MEJ4T / CITY COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT PLiA•,;,...- CITY OF RENTON Date 6'1) MAR 2 2 2000 RECEIVED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT March 16,2000 Removal of Restrictive Covenants—Tamaron Pointe Apartments (March 13, 2000) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence with staff recommendation to authorize the removal of restrictive covenants that were required as a condition of the rezone of the subject property in 1983 from Trailer(T)to Residence(R-3). The covenants require: 1. Voluntary payment of $6,450 for specific traffic improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard. 2. Requirement for specific off-site public street improvements including: installation of a left turn lane opposite the entrance to the Lakeside site; provision of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting and all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the Lakeside site;provision of asphalt surface temporary sidewalks from the property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Park, traffic control (signage and striping)for pedestrians crossing Lake Washington Boulevard from the east to the west side near the north entrance to Coulon Park, provided that the applicant would not be required to duplicate these improvements. 3. Requirement that no development of the project is to occur to the east of the toe of the slope as defined in the restrictive covenant. 4. Requirement that the number of dwelling units proposed would be restricted to 187;provided, however, that in the event of a zoning change to permit more units than 187, such zoning change would supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. _ The covenants were required as a condition of rezoning of the property in 1983 (R-90-81). The restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development on the site. The covenants are no longer relevant as they have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property. In addition, approval of the land use permits for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments further render the restrictive covenants unnecessary. tampdc\ - TANMRM1 3 March 20,2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 97 CARRIED. (See page 98 for ordinance.) EDNSP: Automall Overlay Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report District Amendments(Areas recommending that the Council set a public hearing for April 10,2000 to "A"and`B") consider amendments to Area"A"and Area`B"of the Automall Overlay District, and to Section 9-14-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of-way Vacations. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Development Services: Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Tamaron Pointe Apts Removal recommending concurrence with the staff recommendation to authorize the of Restrictive Covenants(Lk removal of restrictive covenants that were required as a condition of the rezone of Wash Blvd),R-81-090 the Tamaron Pointe Apartments property in 1983 from Trailer(T)to Residential (R-3). The covenants require: 1. Voluntary payment of$6,450 for specific traffic improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard. 2. Requirement for specific off-site public street improvements including: installation of a left turn lane opposite the entrance to the lakeside site; provision of curbs,gutters,sidewalks,and street lighting and all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the lakeside site; provision of asphalt surface temporary sidewalks from the property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Park;traffic control(signage and striping) for pedestrians crossing Lake Washington Boulevard from the east to the west side near the north entrance to Coulon Park,provided that the applicant would not be required to duplicate these improvements. 3. Requirement that no development of the project is to occur to the east of the toe of the slope as defined in the restrictive covenants. 4. Requirement that the number of dwelling units proposed would be restricted to 187;provided,however,that in the event of a zoning change to permit more units than 187,such zoning change would supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. The covenants were required as a condition of rezoning of the property in 1983 (R-81-090). The restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development on the site. The covenants are no longer relevant as they have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property. In addition,approval of the land use permits for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments further render the restrictive covenants unnecessary. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance:Vouchers Payroll Vouchers 24534-24755,and 527 direct deposits totaling$983,404.44. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utility:Utility Shutoffs(City Councilman Parker announced that in 1993,at the request of then- Policy and Procedures) Councilmember Nancy Mathews,the City Council had referred the subject of enforcement of utility liens and related claims for damages to the Finance Committee. He felt that this subject would best be broached in Committee of the Whole so all Councilmembers could participate in the discussion and any 4o Ar-o - -040Nr 4CIT .)FRENT"N Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman RE.,Administrator March 1, 2002 John Shenk Sobrato Development Co. #792 SI VI, LLC 10600 North De Anza Blvd. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Rescission of Restrictive Covenants #8312120558 Alexan Multi Family Residential Development 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N., Renton City Land Use File #LUA98-123- Dear Mr. Shenk: This letter is to advise you that the City intends to finalize the rescission of the above-referenced restrictive covenants. We found after researching our files that it was clearly the City Council's intent to rescind these covenants in May of 2000 (see attached recorded Release of Restrictive Covenants document recorded under King County recording number 20000522001420). f have enclosed a copy of a City Council Planning and Development Committee report indicating the Council's intent to eliminate the covenants. Unfortunately, the Release of Restrictive Covenants document actually filed by the City did not accomplish the Council's intent as it inadvertently referenced a previous version of the covenants (#8312050533) and did not extinguish the current version of the covenants in question. In order to rectify this situation, Development Services staff will immediately begin work processing a corrected version of the "Release of Covenants" document and will ensure that it is recorded with King County. This process should take approximately 2-3 weeks. Please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7294 with any questions you may have about this letter. Sincerely, Laureen Nicolay Senior Planner, Development Services Division enclosures cc: Michael Collins, Trammel Crow Residential Douglas L. Daley, Trammel Crow Residential Jennifer Henning City Land Use File #LUA98-123 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 oap _. ecyrie: 3,s,_!.z0'• pas'consumer Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 20000522001420 CITY OF RENTON R 9.00 PAGE 001 OF 002 05/22/2000 14:31 KING COUNTY, WA artei RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Property Tax Parcel Numbe 229650-200 Project File#: R-090-081 (Lake Terrace Park Associates Street Intersection: 2100 Lake Washin: on t3ou evard Rezone) North Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton 1. Alex Cugini,Jr.,J.Steve Harer LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M,.in King County,Washington,lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard;except that portion platted as Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;together with that c—i portion of vacated Southeast 100°1 Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law. oParcel B: Lots 39,40,and 41,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 1020457;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100m Street(formerly known as Mildred cv Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No.3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. o Parcel C: That portion of Lot 28,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King o County,Washington lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot,distant being 122 feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot,being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner 0 of said lot;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel D: Lot 27,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King county, Washington;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No.3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel E: That portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington,described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning;thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27,Eldon Acres,with the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5:thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden,Division No.5,according to the plat recordedin Volume 11 of Plats,page 83,in King County,Washington;thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning;thence North to the true point of beginning;except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right-of-way(200 feet in width)of Pacific Coast Railroad Company. Whereas the Grantee,as named above,is the holder of a restrictive coy •.• :cquired from the above named Grantor dated December 12,1983 and recorded under Recording Num• 8312050533 .f King County,State of Washington; and iyrr-rGC records?..3# re,cexerNce WHEREAS,the City of Renton,Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1983;and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development of the site;and, WHEREAS;said restrictive covenants applied to the then current zoning;and, WHEREAS,the zoning of this site has subsequently changed;and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property;and, WHEREAS,the City Council authorized the removal of the restrictive covenants on March 20,2000; NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby authorize the release of the restrictive covenants described above on the land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said City has caused this instrument to be executed this/fi Iay of 'Al20b0 . \\�O,IIUIW11111my;,.� City of RentonCr l/ T �► ss zit S1 AL *s Jesse er,Mayor Cos otimnnelmilO a Marilyn Pet:7 ,CI ty Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Je55G 1 i ti e r ,�}+ and Most I ►1 Pe L(9" signed this instrument and acknowledged that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and �4 acknowledged it as the 1Yt& or and a t,VL "" of (^^t1 0� RPM tint to be the free and voluntary of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument .mot t.a r '* Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ttc „§ 03. Notary(Print) I61.61� Ne,u.vn AM VI r o• f My appointment expires: u 11°l 12° Dated: 5p5I UQ0 3 I J 2 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Property Tax Parcel Number: 229650- 2000 Project File#: R-090-081 (Lake Terrace Park Associates Street Intersection:2100 Lake Washington Rezone) Boulevard North Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton 1. Tamaron Pointe Lp LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in King County,Washington, lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard;except that portion platted as Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 86, in King County, Washington; together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by_operation of law. Parcel B: Lots 39,40, and 41, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 86, in King County, Washington; except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 1020457;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 1001h Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining,that would attach by operation of law; together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel C: That portion of Lot 28, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, in King County,Washington lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot, distant being 122 feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot, being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel D: Lot 27, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 86, in King County. Washington;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel E: That portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County,Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, in King County,Washington;thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning; thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27, Eldon Acres,with the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5: thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, in King County,Washington; thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning; thence North to the true point of beginning; except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right- of-way(200 feet in width) of Pacific Coast Railroad Company. Whereas the Grantee, as named above, is the holder of a restrictive covenant acquired from the above named Grantor dated December 12, 1983 and recorded under Recording Number 8312120558 of King County, State of Washington; and WHEREAS,the City of Renton,Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1983; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development of the site; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants applied to the then current zoning; and, WHEREAS, the zoning of this site has subsequently changed; and, WHEREAS, said restrictive covenants have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property; and, WHEREAS,the City Council authorized the removal of the restrictive covenants on March 20,2000; NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby authorize the release of the restrictive covenants described above on the land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said City has caused this instrument to be executed this day of 20 City of Renton Jesse Tanner, Mayor Bonnie Walton,City Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that and signed this instrument and acknowledged that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: • t� tom:..: ._, `....e 1 ..:1 NA ' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 1, 2002 John Shenk Sobrato Development Co. #792 SI VI, LLC 10600 North De Anza Blvd. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Rescission of Restrictive Covenants #8312120558 Alexan Multi Family Residential Development 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N., Renton City Land Use File #LUA98-123 Dear Mr. Shenk: This letter is to advise you that the City intends to finalize the rescission of the above-referenced restrictive covenants. We found after researching our files that it was clearly the City Council's intent to rescind these covenants in May of 2000 (see attached recorded Release of Restrictive Covenants document recorded under King County recording number 20000522001420). I have enclosed a copy of a City Council Planning and Development Committee report indicating the Council's intent to eliminate the covenants. Unfortunately, the Release of Restrictive Covenants document actually filed by the City did not accomplish the Council's intent as it inadvertently referenced a previous version of the covenants (#8312050533) and did not extinguish the current version of the covenants in question. In order to rectify this situation, Development Services staff will immediately begin work processing a corrected version of the "Release of Covenants" document and will ensure that it is recorded with King County. This process should take approximately 2-3 weeks. Please feel free to contact me at 425-430-7294 with any questions you may have about this letter. Sincerely, Laureen Nicolay Senior Planner, Development Services Division enclosures cc: Michael Collins, Trammel Crow Residential Douglas L. Daley, Trammel Crow Residential Jennifer Henning City Land Use File#LUA98-123 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 20000522001420 CITY OF RENTON R 9.00 PAGE 001 OF 002 05/22/2000 14:31 KING COUNTY, WA RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Property Tax Parcel Number. 229650-200 Project File#: R-090-081 (Lake Terrace Park Associates Street Intersection: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard Rezone) North Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton 1. Alex Cugini,Jr.,J.Steve Harer LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,.in King County,Washington,lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard;except that portion platted as Eldon o Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;together with that c� portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law. Parcel B: Lots 39,40,and 41,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 1020457;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100°i Street(formerly known as Mildred cv Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law,together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No.3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel C: That portion of Lot 28,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot,distant being 122 o feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot,being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property byoperation of law. P Parcel D: Lot 27,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King county, Washington;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No.3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel E: That portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington,described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning;thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27,Eldon Acres,with the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5:thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden,Division No.5,according to the plat recordedin Volume 11 of Plats,page 83,in King County,Washington;thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning;thence North to the true point of beginning;except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right-of-way(200 feet in width)of Pacific Coast Railroad Company. Whereas the Grantee,as named above,is the holder of a restrictive covenant acquired from the above named Grantor dated December 12, 1983 and recorded under Recording Number 8312050533 of King County,State of Washington; and WHEREAS,the City of Renton,Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1983;and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development of the site;and, WHEREAS;said restrictive covenants applied to the then current zoning;and, WHEREAS,the zoning of this site has subsequently changed;and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property;and, WHEREAS,the City Council authorized the removal of the restrictive covenants on March 20,2000; NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby authorize the release of the restrictive covenants described above on the land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said City has caused this instrument to be executed this/(%day of 2060 � ,?.:ttIVII!!!7C;;,.;�i/i Cityof Renton I I (SLI Hesse er,Mayor •••FUSE'`6•�0�\\ Dildut:a /j Marilyn Pet:.'o ty Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that,Jf55G Tit n tier and Pe I'C Y5e+t signed this instrument and acknowledged that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the ins rtunent and , �r acknowledged it as the MA- pr and (.t,j WAIL- of r^t1—� Reihtfr. to be the free and voluntary of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument 1pktidukt l lJl Y> a/l liyv Notary Public in an for the State of Washington Notary(Print) P1(.1'1.�-f✓ N ti 14.01 d VI V� My appointment expires: CII l°l 200 1 Dated: Sf I$I ?00 I 7 7 D 7 4 2 APPri O 2 1 11' CITY COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT PLA Nl v;, CITY OF RENTON Date MAR 2 2 2000 RECEIVED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT March 16,2000 Removal of Restrictive Covenants—Tamaron Pointe Apartments (March 13, 2000) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence with staff recommendation to authorize the removal of restrictive covenants that were required as a condition of the rezone of the subject property in 1983 from Trailer(T)to Residence(R-3). The covenants require: 1. Voluntary payment of $6,450 for specific traffic improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard. 2. Requirement for specific off-site public street improvements including: installation of a left turn lane opposite the entrance to the Lakeside site; provision of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting and all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the Lakeside site;provision of asphalt surface temporary sidewalks from the property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Park; traffic control (signage and striping)for pedestrians crossing Lake Washington Boulevard from the east to the west side near the north entrance to Coulon Park, provided that the applicant would not be required to duplicate these improvements. 3. Requirement that no development of the project is to occur to the east of the toe of the slope as defined in the restrictive covenant. 4. Requirement that the number of dwelling units proposed would be restricted to 187;provided, however, that in the event of a zoning change to permit more units than 187, such zoning change would supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. The covenants were required as a condition of rezoning of the property in 1983 (R-90-81). The restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development on the site. The covenants are no longer relevant as they have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property. In addition, approval of the land use permits for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments further render the restrictive covenants unnecessary. tampdc\ Kathy K olker-Wheeler, Chair im Schlitzer, c hair Dan Clawson, Member cc: Jennifer Toth Henning Document9\ tampdc\ qmo ..Il Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator �- March 1, 2002 John Shenk Sobrato Development Co. #792 SI VI, LLC 10600 North De Anza Blvd. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Vacation of a Portion of Lakeview Blvd as Referenced in Notice of Boundary Line Agreement#8509110605 Alexan Multi Family Residential Development 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N., Renton City Land Use File #LUA98-123 City Vacation File #VAC002-85 Dear Mr. Shenk: This letter is to confirm that the described vacation as stated in the agreement was approved by the Renton City Council on October 7, 1985 and recorded under King County recording number 8510110735 and there are no further outstanding obligations relating to this vacation proposal. have attached a copy of the implementing City Ordinance (#3947) and a copy of the King County Tax Assessor's map showing the area as vacated. I hope this information meets your needs. Sincerely, -- Laureen Nicolay Senior Planner, Development Services Division enclosures cc: Michael Collins, Trammel Crow Residential Douglas L. Daley, Trammel Crow Residential Jennifer Henning 1055 South��!!�� Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 CR]This nailer contains SO%recycled material 20°,,nnst consumer Renton City Council 10/7/85 Page six Old Business continued Utilities to allow property owners, by majority agreement, the option to Committee underground power poles at their cost under the following Undergrounding circumstances: the poles parallel high tension wires, which Ordinance cannot be removed, either on the same side or opposite side of continued the right-of-way (Section 4-1803(H)). The Committee further recommended that the topic be referred to Ways and Means Committee for preparation of the ordinance. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Community Services Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report Services indicating that the matter of the old City Shop site, referred Committee to Committee on 4/14/80, should be removed from the referral Old City list since the project is complete. Any change in the use of Shop Site the property as a Peapatch Community Garden would require referral to the Committee. Swimming Pier Community Services Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report at Coulon advising that the swimming pier at Coulon Beach Park, referred Beach Park to Committee on 7/8/85, will be referred to the Park Board and the City Council following bid process, now underway. Since the plans have been reviewed, the Committee recommends removal of the matter from the referral list. Social Service Community Services Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report Funding indicating that requests for funding submitted by Alano Lounge (7/15/85), Reality Alano Lounge (8/5/85), and Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN) (8/5/85) should be removed from the Committee referral list since recommendations for 1986 funding levels have been submitted to the Mayor for budget deliberations. Upon inquiry, funding recommendations were presented as follows: Renton Area Youth Services - $31,200; Rape Relief - $6,000; DAWN - $7,500 ($10,000 requested); Reality Alano Club - -0-; and Southend Alano Lounge - -0- ($10,000 requested). It was noted that funds could not be given to the Southend Alano Lounge for the requested purpose of capital improvements to a rented facility. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORTS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Bus Stops Councilman Stredicke asked for a status report on the relocation in CBD of Metro bus stops in the central business district. Mayor Shinpoch agreed to provide an update. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second & final reading: Ordinance #3945 An ordinance was read annexing property located on the north Maplewood Golf side of Maple Valley Highway at 13020 SE Maple Valley Highway Course (SR-169) into the City of Renton. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3946 An ordinance was read annexing property located south of Dochnahl NE 4th Street and west of Duvall Avenue NE into the City Annexation of Renton. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3947 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Lakeview Boulevard Vacation of (SE 104th Street) lying north of 3rd Avenue (north of Gene Lakeview Coulon Memorial Beach Park) for Lincoln Property Company Boulevard (estate of Anna Phinney), VAC 002-85. MOVED BY CLYMER, VAC 002-85 SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. (First reading on CARRIED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. 7/1/85) ays and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3947 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD (VAC-002-85 LINCOLN PROPERTIES) WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of Lakeview Boulevard, Renton, King County, Washington, was duly filed with the 0 City Clerk on or about April 25, 1985, and said petition having been signed by the owners representing more than two-thirds (2/3 ) of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS the City Council by Resolution No. 2603 passed and approved on May 13 , 1985, and after due investigation, did fix and determine the 10th day of June, 1985 at the hour of 8 : 00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearing in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto; and the City Council having considered all information and arguments presented to it, and WHEREAS the Board of Public Works of the City of Renton having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacations ; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: -1- ORDINANCE NO. 3947 SECTION I : The following described portion of street, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED SUBJECT to an easement over, across, under and on all of the aforedescribed property in favor of the City for utility and related purposes . SECTION II : The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $15 , 113 . 33 to Petitioner-Owners, said amount not exceeding one-half (1/2 ) of the City' s appraisal of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper . SECTION III : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 7th day of October, 1985 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 7th day of October, 1985 . • o0.bCsotc) .54;;LLrtpoc`-P) Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. W ren, City Attorney Date of Publication: October 11 , 1985 -2- ORDINANCE NO. 3947 EXHIBIT 'A' All of that portion of 104th Avenue S.E. (AKA Lakeview Boulevard) lying northerly of the East-West centerline of Section 5. Township 23N. Range 5E, W.M. as shown on the plat of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Division No. 5. as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats. Page 83, records of King County. Wash- ington. and lying southerly of the westerly production of the northline of Tract 341 as shown on said plat. - -- • NORrH L/NE T24C7 .9410 ,45 DETERM/N , • • ' 6Y 6:4R414.4I4 H/TChr'/N69 JvR✓EY Lle Al t\i A \ NJ a) \A < 344 1 N toN \3o\ `�.• 94 47 ---:•.; � E.II/ SEC. 6•d3:S, N6i \ • /24 i7' �/ 4 5.E, CORN�Z : ' \.)" '--- / � ti;7_ ,^over Lor 2 . , , '- it /,IV yr OA / 7 eft (Mo'/d'Zo"iV 66.�.40)Cgedi OW .��r $(/a 18'1r AI 443.9/' .D Ai •� '"' 1-7 )— - -w: ¢ /lc<ototyf 7- -1tr. z tits qc `'�, , ..1--t 2 . • --:-).A,4..X .34 3 ' w4 `, Lid 9T- T�r. ,:' . '1:,r; .:I ,..-4 . I".. 10----)z•\ - , .:.;,.1•. ` + D -f ✓i / O i ' 0 !' 60 1r >,c /ARO� lg t (�� /`I ;W j rn\.' f�NC._6 s,1: PicaiuSflM4696G IVN CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P/'/NA/L-K STREET MCA T/ON DESIGNED__ DATE AiA /✓ � , FILE NO DRAWN ____._____/ -..-_..__ cru• _._ ____ _._- a. —•g '.a k‘i ) si m o m _L � � N 2' I va M Vro o o,. y. .. . tel o,F� N a s `? 020 IJ 3• k/Wi � N •'�Iy1/� 1 r• 7 • I FL99//Si2//,/// ) // /// li 1 a9r�oxd 3N •3AV HJIH� I �� I .% v /sxc ;/9�E /MSE 1, a N. 1 I s//7YSE //xSE I / / r 1 -IO m_,i• 0 ��N:Me A'%iH� C739AY"taw) o • NA es 1 `I - - - ^--�--r r - i (` 1 ``, i M 6ry'- N I 1 �I Q7t�LE I 1 Y 1 1 M b2%7ss I I V 1 ,/��jgSF O> bZ�?S67 1 \1 M N fi t 2 / M r 0 I _ 1 ^ I / m N M 1 ........... 1 //// / ////////I /� CrI Aar2s�,39rL//c ->. / V M vo M r h. _ l (/� 0 3sj2' 1 1 ' R -I- 6" �� QQ , V J I� \\ /`'� 1 a 1 \ • G� As I \ , \\ O IfIG 1'h� ' 3 0 0 \ Z o \q� ii 111 I \ \ • v I � a \ 1 Z \ 0. ' _ J I V \ 11 N JI 0 1 Omm — 3 \ 9 `✓ a re) tu F01 I / n \ J 1 / CO / m ON /N. / ./...........--7.....7M y u N I, / N 01• 7 1 1 / f••- ' sr / / r in / M %Yw m / / e m CA / .- Ooz - 00Z 2 I / z/-9z-/or - % —�>n!n�,n y.�� (ems�n� r/1 n0/] '�•ZZZIm —- "o.pz _ _ r -J/ .-.,,$) A.C'szo�/-,zii oo r .red-�i6 aor<� ss'6Sz 77/7Ez-,oiv m_-1, W`a a. �Y,Y. C Z8%//5�.Y& A a�S oL//- %92•A.,0 , •no • g07o//6058 '»a µ •`09 *4-['74...,o 2"7.9f'.z . It4w v7Waa�yu7 � C S Off'" Op . a �02 A �6- is 8 2a �0 4y21)0 -4- 9 22 2S/- • 1C 8 / - * _p �'ZA• +3g• 4 K\ Sry o m A� d \,\gyp. N' N '�0-V o •�pN 1 C/ tlo � a a < '2 ,9.44ASN\14 o 6 I; 21 Yv ///s1P 1�95 LPK• � gt°) J ��S. i8,13 o sod q35- (N•P 2 ale. ZS29. J . 0 l r/r01 l9 1,9.2r.l5� CQ. \ o i ,, " Nj L9a'4 gyp•�0' 47— .--Z._ /O 76- 8 19 for u >4 9_514 • .73q.113 \y N\1,2 y1.401 v1 y�t R+ • — • - 4 , CITY F RENTON _ t$ •41. Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren RECEIVED •.• -..• • . •- • - ••, • MEMORANDUM - JUN 2 1 2000 • - • • CIrVOFRENTON • . PUBUC WORKS ADMIN. To: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator,Planning/Building/Public Works From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Staff Contact: Sonja Fesser, Technical Services CITY OF RENTON Date: June 20, 2000 JUN 22 2000 Subject: Release of Easement RE-00-002 Petitioner: Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership RECEIVED . • I have no comments. The issue paper is complete and informative. ' • • —.-- • . • Lawrence J. W. -n - - LJW:as. cc: Jay Covington A8:174.50. • , . - • , • - • ,. . . • - - • - - • Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 , • .t a)This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer , „ RE-00-002 . - •jos.7o Ps -ier ,vef-coe coo - `� fit - __I a • !�F ?y ~ 0 `ee °�� � ��` O 2 Q a `� 1AD o P.AS '. A3 .�, 32 A, 31 30 °' /SS • ,8.OP - /oo t�OQ'_sF!• 20. N I ,0ED N an O seses26T/1 ° D 0 n t.i'90 c ik- '"�_Z y rfcsoa $T • ti 0�,77 w1'N" e ze.00 �c ' `= 29 t7 v :Tot ._, • REN-SP.228 0 3 7 - y 3ih ,YRo. j� 790418901 ice 46,..., 51.,-4, C3It.ilit) • ti 110 ti 4 I ?r % �� 9° o M1h iez.Js rs.v� °, � N.Ip qq, h 1 yo eb•rf•zfw 3cs 2 . p� v 11 \ b 0 '9.4e "�q0 t k(s.4 000 p ',b ' 0\ 38 .,`�, t.z-. orom nti,Ai'7 if • ,�` h N 1 \ h A. 4i ti 2y , 0" le v 1 w a°LOT 4 y iY LOT 21 R .. ? 4 3 a o v: .n-q.K e� 42 /v ~roR so 2 ,1 ,6 4, a m N pot' I. 8,LOT 3 o�'e't Q it �`e\k'G ^134f I,� �ej y h� o y1' f' ° Z ' N u' N17-lo•nab a, Am 50.2WY E N16.543ie r5 y� a kil 4 ./Bi,9 ! 54z ,/.f7 won sz.so '„� 0 \a�. N ,� --a 1.oo -� /48.54 'h �' /ez.zd .�J� \ N69-e3-4-N e, �.itr �� r�,p • 41 40 SitN o Lot`��® 4.0 u N RlOTS2l , 27 „,658.44a Nn o3.I5N e".,•. ve,-o f\P\tl. 0 a_� — Vt% Q .sdeaEFF�FI '�k;$.oi Nth >.JaMEs K 0'' ��i:as- -- ---+� 3h' o�''b � Lot c�hr�i �Y...7sE/wm 3T wr�avl'ez�«° AiL96 �v \� 5•P' r �Ziva < tis0s563 v ��3''yw �v 1610ot0 \0 .u1 it6> p K\ .0 w 4\ /��' \ a \�� l0� Vitis e ✓Ad-in.ac u/ 4, •°A . Portion of the NW ''A of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. CBLE O T MA 700 N 31ST STa I e .• NE 33.ST ` - MY N 30TH o ST yq • CREEK 100 i N 29TH ST © r� M -- Legend: -r m N 28TH PL^ Nix --r -NE E 1°" 28TH * e , b_ STH-—St, NE -—NE- 27TH ` Portion of Easement to be released r 7TM LIONs v XE7er E 2100 ��\ (King County Rec.No. 8012120762) 49f�, 21H , E pm( AllE ST = W tnTe r>= Portion of Easement not released "• N 4 4 tie . Pit '• :--• (King County Rec.No. 8012120762) CT N ST = 1700 Wili OE V W '' N S 3 rc 23 ND S' YLa_tX < 5 NE 21ST pz 0 3l-NE 20TH -. ST VICINITY MAP $• t'o° ii. < • ,. W v i E un Thomas Bros.Maps ` 2 8 UI ,,M itl z MAP EXHIBIT -- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON'. _ . ORDINANCE NO. 3447 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF PELLY PL. N. (VAC-2-80/LAKE TERRACE ASSOCIATES) WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of Pelly P1. .tl N. , Renton, King County, Washington, was duly filed with the City Clerk O CD CDon or about April 30, 1980, and said petition having been signed by O owners representing more than two-thirds of the property abutting upon CD such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS the City Council by Resolution No. 2335 passed and approved on May 19. 1980, and after due investigation, did fix and determine the 23rd day of June, 1980, at the hour of 8:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearing in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or. in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS the Department of Public Works and the Planning Department of the City of Renton having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described portion of street , to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED SUBJECT to an easement over, across , under and on all of the aforedescribed property in favor of the City for utility and related purposes. SECTION II The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of one-half of the appraised value of $ 1,65 per square foot to Petitioner- Owners, said amount not exceeding one-half of the City's appraisal of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper. sfATE of Wf<s1ttNGTON) S SS. COUNTY Of KING l nor. f..AEL0I2.ES-_A.y/-���n..rn.c!«,I in,b f« u» cxy of Renton. TILEDfor i� :.Jl at Request o� Washington. do hereby certil Intl the fornofirg.Ordimnce is a true and correct 7-:,—':-ol the C of Renton.a it appears on I& copy of Ordinance No. � Name�LA�'---/`----•••i 4—^+ L �� in ne r:IKe, and do Iwtbe cprtlly lhtt the at a,e ha-been published according • •rr Addr rI ' ar Witness Whereof I fldn w:herrki set my Mend end affixed the seal of the ess• _ � of CC ele.CLELE..4, i r:ih of Renton.lhis/..�.:..�f.Q �-af EXHIBIT "A" VAC-2-80 PELLY PLACE NORTH Ordinance No. 3447 That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest one- quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , having a width of 50 feet known as Pelly Place North (formerly 102nd Place S.E, ) as situated within the plat of Eldon Acres as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats pages 86A and 86B records of Xing County, Washington and further described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 28 of said plat; thence South 16°57'45" East along the easterly right-of-way line of said street of 433.98 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 27 of said plat; Thence North 88°37'15" West a distance of 52.68 feet to the southeast corner of vacated S.E. 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) Ordinance No. 1824; Thence North 16°57'45" West along the westerly right-of-way line of said street 'c' a distance of 405.81 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 39; OThence North 59°59'06" East a distance of 51 .33 feet to the true point of beginning. C CD c0 PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT RE-00-002 LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest quarter of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,City of Renton,King County, Washington, having a width of 50 feet, known as Pelly Place North(formerly 102nd Place SE)as situated within the plat of Eldon Acres,as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,Pages 86A and 86B, records of King County, Washington, and further described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 28 of said plat; Thence South 16°57'45" East along the easterly right-of-way line of said street, a distance of 433.98 feet,to the southwest corner of Lot 27 of said plat; Thence North 88°37'15" West, a distance of 52.68 feet, to the southeast corner of vacated SE 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue), said SE 100th Street vacated under City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 1824; Thence North 16°57'45" West along the westerly right-of-way line of vacated Pelly Place North, a distance of 405.81 feet,to the northeast corner of Lot 39 of said plat; Thence North 59°59'06" East, a distance of 51.33 feet, to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion lying northerly of a line 15 feet southerly and parallel with the northerly boundary line of the above described vacated street. .vz;s.0.$,,..t '-::.‘,..±,::,,..,,,,,. .:iN.,-,,„A., ,......t,,,,,‘,Ali .!,. • - -,, „%,•- • ,..' ':‘,,,,•:;,4..(", _-r•-• _. -, -' e ' -- .•,qt._ , , 3 i„. re':444 re ,.. '*" e"". ', , e.,.,j', — v' ,“,; .4, ",,,'„` t'; e ,`: . , ,,„ e, ,,,, e',. 1,,,,,,. "•' ' ,• . ' ' ' 1 . `.' 'f.—Jis .. 4 . P.-CT'''''' . '. I '-• ' -• i %0 NEgaip ' • ' - ' t Office of the City Attorney ,. ,,,,,,, . ' ,. LaIvrence J.VVarren Jesse Tanner,Mayor ' ' ,.2....„. 4 1 - . ' .• ' ' ' ''' • -' ' -'. .:-.-.-• -,- ., , . ,. ,,, .,, .,,,_; .,: , ,..;, ,,, ,., /.. ,, .7.. --,,,'. ',.., st,;'1' , „ -/: ';'- .z.,-,i---, ".`i-'• ,;':'''',.%;: EVIGI V IGLO\'''' '''. 4 p . , ...,,.,. „,.... ..4.,.,..,, ,, ,,_...., .,. :,, 4 ::,s...;. ' .'"' : f.y•,..,.. •,•,, ,e, ,,,,,,,..,5,,,i,,,,.. %..;„ .1.,„f„, t,t, X,,,,„,,c(,,,,,,,,,--:, ,. .-,••,;:',4,„r'At,,,,i', )4-04,oe• ' ,',. 4 gliP:s.. '' ,4' t? - ''- -" ''1"..' . ' ' `' '' '''''' '1',.'''-1'' ''s ' 7 '' ' ' ' , ! :..,21"-0,4.,.1.4,$a ,.-*, ,,eztilr.',",•.-,,;,,,,:.,1,0„t,4,,,,I, , r4.,"NtV,vlet.,'444W-,4,=;;It,":7',,.fiA, ' 4. , 7:12)-D. ,SP-4"-,f14, .1 1.r,„„,„s'-ii''''';',T,, , ,;3-1,-1 '';:',':.';' .f'''',1'17,11:',,;:+;;;JUN 2-4 '20'6"•',...-.','-..,:4,13,,,' ,v--, .- „,„, ._ ,,-.., e . -2, ., „,%, A:',- ' ' AP''''''' ", : 7'. ',' '4, '. ^ wi ' .7.•••,;-'1'..4',.‘ '''-:',.,:—",..:1 ," 4 . ' 1,A,•:,',,' - . .' : ' : ','''' ,_ ,' '' "'•' , ' '. , .. - + • ' ,. ,•,',,: • ' ''Z,:,.f';‘,' ',4 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. To: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator,Planning/Building/Public Works • . . •. . From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney DEVELOPMENT Li SERVICE Staff Contact: Sonja Fesser, Technical Services CITY OF RENTON • Date: June 20, 2000 JUN 22 2000 Subject: Release of Easement RE-00-002 Petitioner: Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership RECEIVED . _ I have no comments. The issue paper is complete and informative. ' • ' , ;, -. ' . * - . . . 4111P* Lawrence J. W. , -n LJW:as. cc: Jay Covington A8:174.50. • , . . • ., . • r . • - ' .. • . ! , • . •.. 4 4 • , • 4 • 4 I' , , . . ._ • .4 --C • '' • • . 1 • ' Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 _. •...-...", - . ' ...-..-,_- i: ,. - '':...., :. 6i6 This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%cost consumer ..< „: .- • ':=`,?,.Y.i. ...,.....„--.• s'r:,:, ":',':l•• ,• '. r RELEASE OF EASEMENT RE-00-002 PETITIONER: TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ISSUE: Technical Services has received a request from Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership for the release of a city-held utilities easement that was reserved via City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3447 in July 1980. The street vacation ordinance was recorded twice, once under King County Recording No. 8010060646 and later under Recording No. 8012120762. See the attached map for the location of the vacated street and subject easement. RECOMMENDATION: Planning/Building/Public Works requests the Board of Public Works approve and recommend to the Utilities Committee the recommendations of the Administration in granting a Partial Release of Easement. These recommendations are as follows: 1. Approve a partial release of the utilities easement, reserved via Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3447, over lands owned by Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership and Gary and Marcie Palmer. Retain the northerly 15 feet of the subject easement for utilities purposes. 2. Collect the requisite processing fee from the applicant. BACKGROUND: The subject easement was reserved via City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3447, which was approved by the Renton City Council in July 1980. The ordinance vacated that portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, having a width of 50 feet and known as Pelly Place North (formerly 102nd Place SE), as situated in the plat of Eldon Acres between the east lines of Lots 39 and 40 and the west lines of Lots 28 and 27 of said plat. The vacation ordinance retained said easement, in favor of the City, for utility and related purposes. Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership is the petitioner of the release request and the current owner of one of two properties involved in this release request. Their property is under development as an apartment complex. As the development nears completion,the owner wishes to clean up the title to the property and retain only those easements that serve some purpose. Gary and Marcie Palmer own the second property affected by the release. Although they are not petitioners of the release request, the subject easement encumbers their property and any release action would unencumber their property accordingly. City staff has determined that the northerly 15 feet of the subject easement should not be released because of the presence of city-held sewer facilities on the Palmer property and the potential need for a route for a new city storm water system within this northerly 15 feet of the subject easement. For these reasons, staff recommends that the release request be changed to a Partial Release of Easement. H:\DIVISION.S\UTILME.S\DOCS\2000-276a.doc\SFltb No public funds were spent in acquiring or maintaining the easement to be released. Therefore, this is a Class "B" release and requires no further compensation other than the processing fee to be paid by the applicant. Class B: All City of Renton easements for which no public funds have been expended in the acquisition, improvement or maintenance of same or easements originally dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the City by the present petitioner for the release of said easement for which no public expenditures have been made in the acquisition, improvement or maintenance thereof . RESEARCH/SURVEY The proposed release of easement was circulated to various city departments and outside agencies for comments. The following is a summary of responses received from all concerned parties. In favor of the Release: Surface Water Utility Requests that the northerly 15 feet of the subject easement be retained for utility purposes. This is to provide for a possible future storm water system route,for an existing storm drainage infiltration system and several public pipe outfalls. Wastewater Utility Requests that the petition be modified to provide for a Partial Release of Easement only. The northerly 15 feet of the subject easement is needed for maintenance of existing wastewater facilities. Water Utility Development Services—Plan Review Development Services—Current Planning Community Services Department—Parks Division Transportation Maintenance Economic Development Fire Prevention Puget Sound Energy AT&T Cable Did Not Respond: Police Department US West Communications CITY ATTORNEY'S COMMENTS: The City Attorney's comments will be added after his review. H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2000-276a.doc\SF\tb RELEASE OF EASEMENT RE-00-002 PETITIONER: TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ISSUE: Technical Services has received a request from Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership for the release of a city-held utilities easement that was reserved via City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3447 in July 1980. The street vacation ordinance was recorded twice, once under King County Recording No. 8010060646 and later under Recording No. 8012120762. See the attached map for the location of the vacated street and subject easement. RECOMMENDATION: Planning/Building/Public Works requests the Board of Public Works approve and recommend to the Utilities Committee the recommendations of the Administration in granting a Partial Release of Easement. These recommendations are as follows: 1. Approve a partial release of the utilities easement, reserved via Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3447, over lands owned by Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership and Gary and Marcie Palmer. Retain the northerly 15 feet of the subject easement for utilities purposes. 2. Collect the requisite processing fee from the applicant. BACKGROUND: The subject easement was reserved via City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3447, which was approved by the Renton City Council in July 1980. The ordinance vacated that portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, having a width of 50 feet and known as Pelly Place North (formerly 102nd Place SE), as situated in the plat of Eldon Acres between the east lines of Lots 39 and 40 and the west lines of Lots 28 and 27 of said plat. The vacation ordinance retained said easement, in favor of the City, for utility and related purposes. Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership is the petitioner of the release request and the current owner of one of two properties involved in this release request. Their property is under development as an apartment complex. As the development nears completion,the owner wishes to clean up the title to the property and retain only those easements that serve some purpose. Gary and Marcie Palmer own the second property affected by the release. Although they are not petitioners of the release request, the subject easement encumbers their property and any release action would unencumber their property accordingly. City staff has determined that the northerly 15 feet of the subject easement should not be released because of the presence of city-held sewer facilities on the Palmer property and the potential need for a route for a new city storm water system within this northerly 15 feet of the subject easement. For these reasons, staff recommends that the release request be changed to a Partial Release of Easement. H:\DMSION.S\UTILIITE.S\DOCS\2000-276a.doc\Sntb No public funds were spent in acquiring or maintaining the easement to be released. Therefore, this is a Class "B" release and requires no further compensation other than the processing fee to be paid by the applicant. Class B: All City of Renton easements for which no public funds have been expended in the acquisition, improvement or maintenance of same or easements originally dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the City by the present petitioner for the release of said easement for which no public expenditures have been made in the acquisition, improvement or maintenance thereof. . RESEARCH/SURVEY The proposed release of easement was circulated to various city departments and outside agencies for comments. The following is a summary of responses received from all concerned parties. In favor of the Release: Surface Water Utility Requests that the northerly 15 feet of the subject easement be retained for utility purposes. This is to provide for a possible future storm water system route,for an existing storm drainage infiltration system and several public pipe outfalls. Wastewater Utility Requests that the petition be modified to provide for a Partial Release of Easement only. The northerly 15 feet of the subject easement is needed for maintenance of existing wastewater facilities. Water Utility Development Services—Plan Review Development Services—Current Planning Community Services Department—Parks Division Transportation Maintenance Economic Development Fire Prevention Puget Sound Energy AT&T Cable Did Not Respond: Police Department US West Communications CITY ATTORNEY'S COMMENTS: The City Attorney's comments will be added after his review. H:\DIVISION.S\UTI LITI E.S\DOC S\2000-276a.d oc\S F\tb RE-00-002 _. . 304..As` - qp- NB!-01�E�20o • ' $32 os _ 0 a . O• - Ni oeiO NZ a 0 A� 32 �k4 31 0la°,bo '°'��' _ •• U�,�h - ma"0 p /DOrJ4 o$�F�• �- N1 ,_--i b ` J NI Pr5 DO' pS .N _ ` 3 5 rs N. v,..iv D .a" �._� as es 2gr ° pbq ,sf;ez 0 A N V A t 10 >✓,e,A. rF,�N ST 2 '01{,9 wel ; YLotA , $ 'st. rt�'srse jL 't 0? of 2e oo e° . 4, f ce .......„_, 29y0 v 12 41 N SP.228 Ac. 37 .0 9,yl 41'Y qp VN 3 • 790418901 o A• 'l4' ,, 1 T 00^� a° o M1h iez.n � d h°l� y • qq h ", 00-t9 Zf w 3cs iu.00 1+ : 0 �� "9.42 �°,00 1 rc s Ak ' 000 10° N A zaoLOT 4 � 4LOT R s 4 Z ? eY 4 3 ,1a0 i 'r10 q.. ea 42 /v.�c3 .rnro�AR- whso 41t .r:s. I .O . ua n� h~ 4 b. 39 0 �� �0 N��e°�``'`�2 a LOT �`"4e� Lot v, v� 2 v ti , v k� 1 ,y�' N m N°�µ �•�$LOT 30�'3 Et �e,k r�•� ‘'�' b'� ti h1 Z i,M N/7-la-zoo. .e.m s0-1nW l .✓au-oe-asw N o ti �v \01.3 ! 24L 3/.f7 pn.p 62-5o sole 6 /o wl a N $22.00 - /46.64 y` 4 , /62.21 r'i, ` ` NBP-03-41 w 1.14 m'�' 4/ V`�, Lot B Q� S-0 `l- REN.SPI • 40 o Vi �1ti'r r• LOT 2: �b i ® o w N�. - — - 658.44 `� 27 pM-0A.ISN w.� k•• vef•o ' 'eY — -----L— — ----.. 1�` "ih�10 � �ALo5C�76�i e"Yeo<° �c 47/aonv we.ad.i624 o s. . �j. .z es... f\ i� ..� r � r n y roes ... ,� 5 P' r 3s�.a C �t.\J (MKO%D A.f J v o /6f:53 v u • r �350 o w Q. V 761011 Of DkO 0 3 3Y' Portion of the NW '/ of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. COL EET1AN /7 700 NT N 31ST ST 14 NE 31.ST J \\N 3 TH d ST y 7*cREE CREEK 700 k ' 1300 f -- Legend: m N_28TH PL 1 as - r ft _NE 1°�"�"28TH m� —28111_— WE —NE- 27TM ` Portion of Easement to be released 2�TM KENT E 2100 h ��\ (King County Rec.No. 8012120762) it PARK w wirp,N 7(:: LIONS Portion of Easement not released e NE2:1 (King County Rec.No. 8012120762) CT N ST = 1700 - W 3 iz N 23RD s' LL.L `< 5 NE 215T n 0 'NE 20TH FV ST VICINITY MAP "si 1700 a." " , ' _ :2- a g: M ISM ST Thomas Bros.Maps w :i • .-- _ s�I`.'. ,� MAP EXHIBIT CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON' _ ORDINANCE NO. 3447 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF PELLY PL. N. (VAC-2-80/LAKE TERRACE ASSOCIATES) WHEREAS a proper petition for vacating a portion of Pelly P1. V' .a N. , Renton, King County, Washington, was duly filed with the City Clerk O CD CDon or about April 30, 1980, and said petition having been signed by O owners representing more than two-thirds of the property abutting upon CD op such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS the City Council by Resolution No. 2335 passed and approved on May 19, 1980, and after due investigation, did fix and determine the 23rd day of June, 1980, at the hour of 8:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearing in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS the Department of Public Works and the Planning Department of the City of Renton having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described portion of street, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED SUBJECT to an easement over, across , under and on all of the aforedescribed property in favor of the City for utility and related purposes. SECTION II The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of one-half of the appraised value of $ 1,65 per square foot to Petitioner- Owners , said amount not exceeding one-half of the City's appraisal of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper. ;rar!or wrswncrfm ss. COU NTY OF KING on r. 7 I..1 1EL01�ES—L M`�Q•C n. in and to UM Cky o1 Renton- rILED for i?�'vJl at Request o� wrshinalnn. do hereby cel/dr the!the tonegOk .Ordinenu Is tt true end carets copy of Ordinance No -the.-the.Cin'ot.Ren ton.as it rooters on file Name_ t -•'�•_•_-•r�'Y ��� in r..y rdaKe. end do lurttpr cfxtlfy jhel the same fus..been published according: 0 law. Address:, (J 11" — '.�-=_ _ . In witness whereof I Ally*:het«mei pat my hand sad affixed the seal Of the aty of Kenton. of CFeSE1K13EL, 111 11\ r EXHIBIT "A" VAC-2-80 PELLY PLACE NORTH Ordinance No. 3447 That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest one- quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , having a width of 50 feet known as Pelly Place North (formerly 102nd Place S.E.) as situated within the plat of Eldon Acres as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats pages 86A and 86B records of King County, Washington and further described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 28 of said plat; thence South 16°57'45" East along the easterly right-of-way line of said street of 433.98 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 27 of said plat; Thence North 88°37'15" West a distance of 52.68 feet to the southeast corner of vacated S.E. 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) Ordinance No. 1824; .a Thence North 16°57'45" West along the westerly right-of-way line of said street "cl" a distance of 405.81 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 39; oThence North 59°59'06" East a distance of 51 .33 feet to the true point of beginning. O CD c0 PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT RE-00-002 LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,City of Renton,King County, Washington, having a width of 50 feet, known as Pelly Place North(formerly 102"d Place SE)as situated within the plat of Eldon Acres, as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Pages 86A and 86B,records of King County, Washington, and further described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 28 of said plat; Thence South 16°57'45" East along the easterly right-of-way line of said street, a distance of 433.98 feet,to the southwest corner of Lot 27 of said plat; Thence North 88°37'15" West, a distance of 52.68 feet, to the southeast corner of vacated SE 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue), said SE 100th Street vacated under City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 1824; Thence North 16°57'45" West along the westerly right-of-way line of vacated Pelly Place North, a distance of 405.81 feet,to the northeast corner of Lot 39 of said plat; Thence North 59°59'06" East, a distance of 51.33 feet,to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion lying northerly of a line 15 feet southerly and parallel with the northerly boundary line of the above described vacated street. • ,,, - . .,. ; � el/0� ire 0R CITY OF RE TON .u. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator June 19, 2000 • • Millard Thacker Tamaron LTD Partnership 4010 Lake Washington BI NE Kirkland, WA. 98033 Dear Mr. Thacker: SUBJECT: Temporary Certificate of Occupancy T 2776 Address: 2100 Lake Washington BI N - Renton Building Permit #: B 980438 The Temporary Certificate of Occupancy as required for the above-subject project is enclosed. Your Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit in the amount of $252,750, drawn on US Bank was received June 16, 2000. The following must be completed or approved within 90 days to issue the permanent Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Public Works - Tom Main, 425-430-7431 * Completion of all punchlist items from the public works inspector. The construction permit must be signed off. * Submittal to the inspector of test reports for all backflow prevention devices by a certified backflow assembly tester. 2. Public Works - Kayren Kittrick — 425-430-7299 * Provide as-built civil plans on mylars for all utility improvements. The as- built plans shall be certified and have a stamp and signature by a Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor. * Submit easements for all water mains and sewer mains on private property that will be maintained by the City. Easements must be approved and recorded prior to approval of final permanent occupancy. * Applicant must submit bills-of-sale and cost data inventory for all public facilities constructed for the project. Standard forms are available at the 6th floor information counter. Bill-of-sale must be approved and recorded prior to approval of the permanent occupancy request. 3. Land Use — Jennifer Henning — 425-430-7286 Prior to final occupancy, all landscaping must be complete. Recording of covenants and easements and the release of existing covenants must be completed. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 lark 4. Fire Prevention Bureau — Corey Thomas — 425-430-7213 * Final all fire alarm permits. * Provide portable fire extinguishers. * Provide approved address signage. * Provide approved fire lane signage. 5. Building Department — Scott Andrus —425-430-7213 * All building and associated permits must be finaled. Questions should be directed to the appropriate individual. Sinc rely, Larry M kling Building Official B990438tcoltr.dot pc: Tom Main Kayren Kittrick Jennifer Henning Corey Thomas Scott Andrus Bruce Reuna 2100 Lake Washington Blv N Renton, WA. 98055 • CERTIFICATE # T 2776 TEMPORARY NINETY DAY CERTIFICATE EXPIRES: SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DIVISION This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 109 of the Uniform Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance, with the various ordinances of the City regulating building construction or use. For the following: Address: 2100 Lake Wash. Blvd. No. Owner/Tenant: Tamaron Point Building Permit #: B990438 Type Construction: V-1 HR Use/Zone: R M I Occupancy Group: M Areas or Floors: Rec. Bldg. /j`� 4� , June 19, 2000 uilding Offi Date: POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE Jun . 14 . 2000 2 : 31PM Na . 0241 P . 1 DEVELOPMENTTCR TRAMMEiL CROW RESIDENTIAL CITY OF ANj pN ING PACIFIC NORTHWEST 2001 SW River Drive JUN 1 4 2000 Portland, OR 97201 RECEIVED (503) 241-3768 Fax: (503) 241-3462 Facsimile Transmittal To: ) /n From Rob Hinnen ❑ ❑ Ann House Fax No: ( ) `f 50 " -0-a ❑ Scott Matthews ❑ Fiona Ward Date: 6//1 0 No. Pages: t3 'omments: L �r " � Pis„±L d -�nIrr aai 11h r6 • Yn74,�1�n w h k s ILe t 7c riftL4•>•%, 4e 4 Hard Copy Sent Via: ❑ Mail ❑ Federal Express ❑ Courier ❑ Other ) None If you do not receive pages indicated above,please notify us immediately(503)241-3768. Jun . 14 2000 2 : 32PM — -- No . 0241 P . 2 allergen Assoclabs Consulting Engineers,Inc. Engineering Planning June 6,2000 Surveying Mr. Rob Hinnen Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd., Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033 (Fax 425-889-0982) Re: Tamaron Pointe-Building 14 As-built Elevations Dear Mr. Hinnen: We've made as-built measurements of the concrete slab poured for the lower level of Building 14. The differences from the planned finished floors are 1/4" or less as shown on the attached diagram. If you have any questions,please give me a call. Sincerely, Pe egon&Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. Mth Dan . Hallin, P.L.S. Principal Surveyor Kirkland Federal Way Cla Elum 06/06/00 TUE 09:11 [TX/RI NO 6068] 001 Jun . 14. 2000 2 : 32PM No . 0241 P . 3 111 • V_,------'- \ ------------ \ ..4,„ N -I \ . ; \ lc\ .00ws a 1111 ..\..._______....--•-"‘ , \I* Ct . •,3(.. 1 11 0. 6 0 04., 67\ co " \-, t x ,\.........._______-- •A-0 ., ‘.1.- \-3 P'" • / , 'N.• A \ (.• /// ‘t! ittOOPtip .5 5 •. - ...„ ) 4",,--,t•.r1•.:,1‘,.. .X•.,•:,.).S,'.1.‘• / • \„ , . vr, ........„„ .„::,...,_.-\ 0. s cr- • ..-----, . ....-- • -.. % CNI ' IN‘'.\•; \ 0 . . 11 . , %.1 it Z hr Nk-k, , ...0."-"''''''\ e" ‘.‘e•tt \i° / ':,`::' t N,3•• - /(' ----""---.----\ . Ill \• A ' 13.- \ kr 4/ .....------------.\ iN - a• 5_L N • -, 0, 6N. A:i •,,,,...s. 1 7_ 0 . ft, 6.‘ •, ,, .,. \kl kt , I\...,.....0"--.-°-....--\\ a oi, 0 .4.- t ,1/4)- % \ • ; :''- '- - . I \ \ -, -, Ili, ,04:,,i,,xi:•=— , i \ - . '. - i \. ! \ .., \\ , 1,;, ' 't ' ., . t •‘?1,.‘14` q • . t 1.; c,..-,V, ,.......,,„ •., ' 9.• A V•P',... • ••••.'.."' ,....': \:•:;:'...‘ A tA \\\ it..•;e'„.. ' 0$ (2) It c4 .r.:., ''.:•• C4)I 6\ tt %••) \\ •• 'I\ "...' '..\ 1.‘ ; \ a: ‘,...., 'Z1 '''' . ‘.1.. ‘t. ......... .'''.. ") Ili '‘V\ V. . // ..t..c\iI‘1.t1 : 0...1.;.................--,-1:;"%,, ...••• 06/06/00 TUE 09:11 (TX/RX NO 60681 a. 002 I • ♦ �N�rO MAY ENr0 N/NG CITY OF RENTON 3 2O600 CITY CLERK DIVISION EcEIVE,0 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 30, 2000 TO: Jennifer Henning, Development Services FROM: Michele Neumann x6521 SUBJECT: Recorded Document Release of Restrictive Covenants/City of Renton/Rec #20000522001420 The attached document has been recorded with King County, and is being returned to you. Please forward copies to parties of interest, and retain a copy for your file. Thank you. Enclosures: (1) cc: Carrie Olson-Davis, Plan Review V Return Address: City Clerk's Office 111111111111111111111111111 City ofSouth Ren on Grady CITY OF 02001085 1055 Grady Way CITY OF RENTON EAS 20.00 Renton WA 98055 PAGE26/0001 OF10133 KING COUNTY, WA Title: UTILITIES EASEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: 229650-0200 06 Project File#:LUA-98-123 Street Intersection or Project Name: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. The Grantor,as named above,for or and in consideration of mutual benefits,hereby grants,bargains,sells and delivers to the above named Grantee,the following described property LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHMENT FOR PORTION MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED IN SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST W.M. L For the purpose of constructing,reconstructing,installing,repairing,replacing,enlarging,operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines,including,but not limited to,water,sewer and storm drainage lines,together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or c=a liability therefor. Following the initial construction of its facilities,Grantee may from time to time construct such additional C' facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall,upon completion of any work within the property covered by the casement,restore the surface of cn the easement,and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work,as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. en 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement o rights granted to the Grantee. 3. Grantor shall not,however,have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement;or b. Plant trees,shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee;or c. Develop,landscape,or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig,tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way,or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen(15)feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein,and shall be binding upon the parties,their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be execut d this/7Tey of /l +4, 2440 7 4✓fla1.rO^A/4;1'e [inn tie et PcriinersA.P By: TC� Pc eaf'•e. Not w-e.r7L rna ids ,•enem 84/ a hoc -i4 + : re..f9A v ley Ibex /T�fr.tiPn,f 01000-0058 Notary Seal must be within box INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: Notary Seal must be within box REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,on oath stated that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary act of such co party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. cD Q cv Notary Public in and for the State of Washington cp.p Notary(Print) My appointment expires: c' Dated: CD Notary Seal must be within box CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT N STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) _ QA J ,CO�!l On this /7L day of May ,-r9- `x',before me personally appeared ,,,, , D /c s L. D P� r, to me known to ii0 be Vice 1 ae s i cQer.-l- of the corporation that coil, / Ci; ' executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free ? V and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein j ',,, t _ , mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said ii 'is,•-•Sn-i`°..' instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. JAI i C!pt{A..a 5IInn Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) /9pyl da ...._7-. eoa 17 My appointment expires: ?4// 30, `Lz) Z Dated: /yIr-4� /7, Z-000 P:\Project Files\98020\wtreasement.doc\ Page 2 FORM 03 0000/bh/CA2-21-97 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY OF THOSE COMMON BOUNDARY LINES AS ESTABLISHED IN THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT FILED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8509110605; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2: LOTS 39, 40 AND 41 OF ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 41 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1020457; c' TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. cv PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; o BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26, ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; `-' THENCE WEST 172 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 27, ELDON ACRES, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 5, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY (200 FEET IN WIDTH) OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4: THAT PORTION OF A CITY OF RENTON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., HAVING A WIDTH OF 50 FEET KNOWN AS PELLY PLACE NORTH (FORMERLY 102ND PLACE SOUTHEAST) AS SITUATED WITHIN THE PLAT OF ELDON ACRES AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGES 86A AND 86B, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 28 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 16'57'45" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 433.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAID PLAT; PAGE 1 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE NORTH 88'37'15" WEST A DISTANCE OF 52.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ORDINANCE NO. 1824; THENCE NORTH 16'67'45" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 405.81 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 39 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 59'59'06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8711230876; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. WATER EASEMENT Lc, 0 W SAID PORTION IS A WATER EASEMENT CONSISTING OF TWO SEGMENTS o MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 0 CD SEGMENT 1 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; o THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL ALONG ca A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1302.33 FEET A DISTANCE OF 268,74 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'49'23" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR SEGMENT 1; o THENCE N69'48'10"E A DISTANCE OF 3.23 FEET; c=' THENCE N25'09'31"E A DISTANCE OF 15.77 FEET; Cv THENCE N16'32'28"W A DISTANCE OF 153.90 FEET; THENCE N33'34'19"E A DISTANCE OF 31.49 FEET; THENCE N56'25'41"W A DISTANCE OF 4.98 FEET; THENCE N33'34'19"E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE S56'25'41"E A DISTANCE OF 4.98 FEET; THENCE N33'34'19"E A DISTANCE OF 108.76 FEET; THENCE N08'02'09"E A DISTANCE OF 22.74 FEET; THENCE N17'O6'44"W A DISTANCE OF 11.38 FEET; THENCE S72'53'16"W A DISTANCE OF 9.75 FEET; THENCE N17'06'44"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N72'53'16"E A DISTANCE OF 9.75 FEET; THENCE N17'06'44"W A DISTANCE OF 30.30 FEET; THENCE N27'57'46"E A DISTANCE OF 27.80 FEET; THENCE N73'02'16"E A DISTANCE OF 104.60 FEET; THENCE S61'57'444E A DISTANCE OF 49.40 FEET; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 193.27 FEET; THENCE S34'28'33"E A DISTANCE OF 164.40 FEET; THENCE S24'40'29"E A DISTANCE OF 38.84 FEET; THENCE SO7'03'19"E A DISTANCE OF 140.40 FEET; THENCE S00'39'17"E A DISTANCE OF 48.94 FEET; THENCE SO4'47'51"E A DISTANCE OF 79.08 FEET; THENCE SO8'54'19"E A DISTANCE OF 109.70 FEET; THENCE S11'32'33"W A DISTANCE OF 23.78 FEET; THENCE S29'51'54"W A DISTANCE OF 18.44 FEET; THENCE S60'08'06"E A DISTANCE OF 15,26 FEET; THENCE S29'51'54"W A DISTANCE OF 10,00 FEET; THENCE N60'08'06"W A DISTANCE OF 15.26 FEET; PAGE 2 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE S29'51'54"W A DISTANCE OF 34.89 FEET; THENCE S20'42'54"W A DISTANCE OF 103.37 FEET; THENCE S6916'47"E A DISTANCE OF 12.73 FEET; THENCE S20'42'54"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N69'17'06"W A DISTANCE OF 12.73 FEET; THENCE S20'42'54"W A DISTANCE OF 14.90 FEET; THENCE S58'44'32"W A DISTANCE OF 15.07 FEET; THENCE S31'15'28"E A DISTANCE OF 17.23 FEET; THENCE S13'41'39"E A DISTANCE OF 108.04 FEET; �n THENCE N7618'21"E A DISTANCE OF 20.75 FEET; op THENCE S13'41'39"E A DISTANCE OF 16.00 FEET; THENCE S7618'21"W A DISTANCE OF 20.75 FEET; THENCE S13'41'39"E A DISTANCE OF 25.97 FEET; c.0 THENCE S10'24'16"E A DISTANCE OF 10.56 FEET; THENCE S07'06'53"E A DISTANCE OF 57.84 FEET; THENCE SO8'47'18"W A DISTANCE OF 13.59 FEET; THENCE S53'47'18"W A DISTANCE OF 10.12 FEET; THENCE S36'25'10"E A DISTANCE OF 20.46 FEET; THENCE S51'59'07"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N36'25'10"W A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 0 THENCE S53'47'18"W A DISTANCE OF 12.80 FEET; THENCE S3612'42"E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE S53'47'18"W A DISTANCE OF 14.50 FEET; THENCE N3612'42"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE S53'47'18"W A DISTANCE OF 50.65 FEET; THENCE N1813'20"W A DISTANCE OF 15.77 FEET; THENCE N53'47'18"E A DISTANCE OF 86.99 FEET; THENCE N08'47'18"E A DISTANCE OF 5.28 FEET; THENCE N07'O6'53"W A DISTANCE OF 44.65 FEET; THENCE S82'53'07"W A DISTANCE OF 8.81 FEET; THENCE N07'O6'53"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N82'53'07"E A DISTANCE OF 8.85 FEET; THENCE N10'24'16"W A DISTANCE OF 10.36 FEET; THENCE N13'41'39"W A DISTANCE OF 119.81 FEET; THENCE S7618'21"W A DISTANCE OF 14.50 FEET; THENCE N18'38'49"W A DISTANCE OF 31.28 FEET; THENCE N58'44'32"E A DISTANCE OF 15.28 FEET; THENCE N31'15'28"W A DISTANCE OF 21.18 FEET; THENCE N58'44'32"E A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N58'44'32"E A DISTANCE OF 9.90 FEET; THENCE N20'42'54"E A DISTANCE OF 124.31 FEET; THENCE N29'51'54"E A DISTANCE OF 44.98 FEET; THENCE N60'08'05"W A DISTANCE OF 14.52 FEET; THENCE N29'51'55"E A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET; THENCE S60'08'05"E A DISTANCE OF 14.56 FEET; THENCE N11'32'33"E A DISTANCE OF 18.79 FEET; THENCE N08'54'19"W A DISTANCE OF 107.53 FEET; THENCE N04'47'S1"W A DISTANCE OF 80.16 FEET; THENCE N00'39'17"W A DISTANCE OF 27.10 FEET; THENCE S89'20'43"W A DISTANCE OF 14.50 FEET; THENCE N00'39'17"W A DISTANCE OF 13.00 FEET; THENCE N89'20'43"E A DISTANCE OF 14.50 FEET; PAGE 3 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE N00'39'17"W A DISTANCE OF 8.55 FEET TO; THENCE NO7'O3'19"W A DISTANCE OF 137.24 FEET; THENCE N24'40'29"W A DISTANCE OF 33.13 FEET; THENCE S55'31'27"W A DISTANCE OF 14.14 FEET; THENCE N34'28'33"W A DISTANCE OF 16.00 FEET; THENCE N55'31'27"E A DISTANCE OF 14.50 FEET; THENCE N34'28'33"W A DISTANCE OF 128.32 FEET; THENCE S55'31'27"W A DISTANCE OF 14.50 FEET; THENCE N34'28'33"W A DISTANCE OF 13.00 FEET; THENCE N55'31'27"E A DISTANCE OF 14.50 FEET; THENCE N3428'33"W A DISTANCE OF 10.18 FEET; THENCE N16'57'44"W A DISTANCE OF 189.36 FEET; THENCE N61'57'44"W A DISTANCE OF 13.45 FEET; CXD THENCE S28'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 5.45 FEET; THENCE N61'57'45"W A DISTANCE OF 14.00 FEET; THENCE N28'02'15"E A DISTANCE OF 5.45 FEET; c:_D THENCE N61'57'44"W A DISTANCE OF 9.52 FEET; Cv THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 44.29 FEET; THENCE S17'11'07"E A DISTANCE OF 8.70 FEET; THENCE S72'48'53"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; C7 THENCE N17'11'07"W A DISTANCE OF 8.74 FEET; THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 37.87 FEET; o THENCE S27'57'46"W A DISTANCE OF 15.35 FEET; ' THENCE S17'06'44"E A DISTANCE OF 48.80 FEET; THENCE SO8'02'09"W A DISTANCE OF 29.56 FEET; THENCE S33'34'19"W A DISTANCE OF 146.59 FEET; THENCE S16'32'28"E A DISTANCE OF 152.56 FEET; THENCE S25'09'31"W A DISTANCE OF 27.66 FEET; THENCE S69'48'10"W A DISTANCE OF 9.65 FEET; THENCE RETURNING NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT A DISTANCE OF 15.01 FEET HAVING A RADIUS 1302.33 FEET THROUGH THE CENTRAL ANGLE 00'39'38" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR SEGMENT 1. SEGMENT 2 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1302.33 FEET A DISTANCE OF 283.75 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'29'01"; THENCE N69'48'10"E A DISTANCE OF 9.65 FEET; THENCE N25'09'31"E A DISTANCE OF 27.66 FEET; THENCE N16'32'28"W A DISTANCE OF 152.56 FEET; THENCE N33'34'19"E A DISTANCE OF 82.94 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR SEGMENT 2; THENCE N33'34'19"E A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE S5625'41"E A DISTANCE OF 47.48 FEET; THENCE S12'55'03"E A DISTANCE OF 59.72 FEET; THENCE N77'04'57"E A DISTANCE OF 35.48 FEET; THENCE S12'55'03"E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE S77'04'57"W A DISTANCE OF 35.48 FEET; THENCE S12'55'03"E A DISTANCE OF 6.22 FEET; PAGE 4 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE S25'06'42"E A DISTANCE OF 132.98 FEET; THENCE S14'33'21"E A DISTANCE OF 42.24 FEET; THENCE N75'26'39"E A DISTANCE OF 19.61 FEET; THENCE S14'33'21"E A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET; THENCE S75'26'39"W A DISTANCE OF 19.61 FEET; THENCE S14'33'21"E A DISTANCE OF 132.03 FEET; THENCE N7528'47"E A DISTANCE OF 42.51 FEET; THENCE S14'33'21"E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE S7528'47"W A DISTANCE OF 42.51 FEET; THENCE S14'33'21"E A DISTANCE OF 20.80 FEET; m THENCE SO8'35'46"E A DISTANCE OF 76.21 FEET; o THENCE S1417'09"E A DISTANCE OF 96.33 FEET; THENCE S07'59'42"E A DISTANCE OF 49.12 FEET; THENCE S1823'05"E A DISTANCE OF 9.21 FEET; c-D THENCE N71'36'55"E A DISTANCE OF 18.25 FEET; THENCE S18'23'05"E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE S71'36'55"W A DISTANCE OF 18.25 FEET; 4, THENCE S1823'05"E A DISTANCE OF 67.62 FEET; THENCE S3115'28"E A DISTANCE OF 45.79 FEET; THENCE S58'44'32"W A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N3115'28"W A DISTANCE OF 47.49 FEET; cLD THENCE N1823'05"W A DISTANCE OF 89.88 FEET; THENCE N07'59'42"W A DISTANCE OF 27.60 FEET; THENCE S82'00'18"W A DISTANCE OF 9.79 FEET; THENCE N18'02'11"W A DISTANCE OF 13.31 FEET; THENCE N71'57'49"E A DISTANCE OF 12.30 FEET; • THENCE N07'59'42"W A DISTANCE OF 6.81 FEET; THENCE N1417'09"W A DISTANCE OF 96.25 FEET; THENCE N08'35'46"W A DISTANCE OF 25.59 FEET; THENCE S8124'14"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N12'00'09"W A DISTANCE OF 22.93 FEET; THENCE N81'24'14"E A DISTANCE OF 11.36 FEET; THENCE N08'35'46"W A DISTANCE OF 27.70 FEET; THENCE N14'33'21"W A DISTANCE OF 108.81 FEET; THENCE S75'26'39"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N14'33'21"W A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N75'26'39"E A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N14'33'21"W A DISTANCE OF 101.09 FEET; THENCE N25'06'42"W A DISTANCE OF 33.34 FEET; THENCE S64'53'18"W A DISTANCE OF 12.25 FEET; THENCE N25'06'42"W A DISTANCE OF 19.54 FEET; THENCE N64'53'18"E A DISTANCE OF 12.25 FEET; THENCE N25'06'42"W A DISTANCE OF 80.32 FEET; u THENCE N12'55'03"W A DISTANCE OF 53.06 FEET; THENCE S77'04'57"W A DISTANCE OF 3.75 FEET; R►• I NF THENCE N12'55'03"W A DISTANCE OF 13.00 FEET; I�OE A' THENCE N77'04'57"E A DISTANCE OF 3.75 FEET; � ► THENCE N12'55'03"W A DISTANCE OF 5.49 FEET; i ! � rs THENCE N56'25'41"W A DISTANCE OF 15.10 FEET; r,• THENCE S33'34'19"W A DISTANCE OF 10.23 FEET; i 4.‘ THENCE N56'25'41"W A DISTANCE OF 14.00 FEET; o`r • 1:61 p THENCE N33'34'19"E A DISTANCE OF 10.23 FEET; ,(` Fc l S TOT E��`' $I THENCE A DISTANCE OF 12.39 FEET ss THE TRUE POINTOF BEGINNING FOR SEGMENT 2. NA L ECG\ 9r00 EXPIRES: MAY 6, 2001 PAGE 5 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MI LINES TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 69'48'10" W 9.65' L55 N 77'04'57" E 3.75' L2 N 69'48'10" E 3.23' L56 N 12'55'03" W 13.00' L3 N 56'25'41" W 4.98' L57 S 77'04'57" W 3.75' L4 N 33'34'19" E 10.00' L58 N 64'53'18" E 12.25' L5 S 56'25'41" E 4.98' L59 N 25'06'42" W 19.54' CO L6 N 17'06'44" W 11.38' L62 S 64'53'18" W 12.25' L7 N 08'02'09" E 22.74' L64 N 75'26'39" E 19.61' L8 N 17'06'44" W 30.30' L65 S 14'33'21" E 17.00' C_D L9 N 27'57'46" E 27.80' L66 S 75'26'39" W 19.61' ry L10 N 17'06'44" W 10.00' L67 N 75'26'39" E 10.00' L11 N 72'53'16" E 9.75' L68 N 14'33'21" W 10.00' c' L12 S 27'57'46" W 15.35' L69 S 75'26'39" W 10.00' L13 N 1711'07" W 8.74' L70 S 14'33'21" E 10.00' L14 S 72'48'53" W 10.00' L71 S 14'33'21" E 20.80' CD L15 S 17'11'07" E 8.70' L72 N 08'35'46" W 27.70' L16 N 61'57'44" W 9.52' L73 N 81'24'14" E 11.36' L17 N 28'02'15" E 5.45' L74 N 12'00'09" W 22.93' L18 N 61'57'45" W 14.00' L75 S 81'24'14" W 10.00' L19 S 28'02'16" W 5.45' L76 N 08'35'46" W 25.59' L20 N 61'57'44" W 13.45' L77 N 07'59'42" W 6.81' L21 N 34'28'33" W 13.00' L78 N 71'57'49" E 12.30' L22 N 55'31'27" E 14.50' L79 N 18'02'11" W 13.31' L25 S 55'31'27" W 14.50' L80 S 82'00'18" W 9.79' L26 N 55'31'27" E 14.50' L81 N 07'59'42" W 27.60' L27 N 34'28'33" W 16.00' L82 S 18'23'05" E 9.21' L28 S 55'31'27" W 14.14' L83 N 71'36'55" E 18.25' L29 N 89'20'43" E 14.50' L84 S 18'23'05" E 10.00' L32 N 00'39'17" W 13.00' L85 S 71'36'55" W 18.25' L33 S 89'20'43" W 14.50' L86 N 58'44'32" E 15.28' L34 N 11'32'33" E 18.79' L87 N 18'38'49" W 31.28' L35 S 29'51'54" W 18.44' L88 S 7618'21" W 14.50' L36 S 60'08'06" E 15.26' L89 N 76'18'21" E 20.75' L37 S 29'51'54" W 10.00' L90 S 13'41'39" E 16.00' L38 N 60'08'06" W 15.26' L91 S 76'18'21" W 20.75' L39 S 60'08'05" E 14.56' L92 N 10'24'16" W 10.36' L40 N 29'51'55" E 17.00' L93 N 82'53'07" E 8.85' L41 N 60'08'05" W 14.52' L94 N 07'06'53" W 10.00' L42 S 6917'06" E 12.73' L95 S 82'53'07" W 8.81' L43 S 20'42'54" W 10.00' L96 S 10'24'16" E 10.56' L44 N 6917'06" W 12.73' L97 S 08'47'18" W 13.59' L45 N 58'44'32" E 9.90' L98 S 53'47'18" W 10.12' L46 N 58'44'32" E 15.00' L99 S 36'25'10" E 20.46' L47 S 58'44'32" W 15.07' L100 S 51'59'07" W 10.00' L48 N 33'34'19" E 15.00' L101 N 36'25'10" W 20.78' L49 N 56'25'41" W 12.39' L102 S 53'47'18" W 12.80' L50 N 33'34'19" E 10.23' L103 N 08'47'18" E 5.28' L51 N 56'25'41" W 14.00' L104 S 53'47'18" W 14.50' L52 S 33'34'19" W 10.23' L106 N 36'12'42" W 10.00' L53 N 56'25'41" W 15.10' L108 N 36'12'42" W 10.00' L54 N 12'55'03" W 5.49' PAGE 6 2000 050 2C01005 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM u 1 SCALE: 1"=150' df G ,D F o „�� Fq � �4 r-----......7 i b i .'- '(4414111 . ... o • 18612 p � MAP 2 I., SEGMENT 1 "kr/O/STF.�" (" I �.. ` .. MAP 3 .'_>r . um!..." , . \\ \ '..\'\..\N.\: \\\ \ \ \\\\\ ':1;1-.\,:‘:-\-\'\ '\` r EVIRES, MAY 6, 2001 „,/,._/,///,,A/,->,/,,/,,„/.„/.,//.-',.N/..,.,:.,,„/,,:/ �. `` \\ , . _ 1„. :_2, ; , \\ \• \\\�\•' ,e/i// '7.7/4=`.7 ,_/.,tom`..= , // / ! / ,•.1\,: '''.'',i''1sf\'' :.-\,s\-.\,-: ,/,,'•..///.•/.:::/,,,'/:,/,..,.",,i;/:/..;/.,,,/,,/,....,,,,_./,,/i.,...//,'///.,,,.__,./_,/_./iL/'//,/.,i,.„,/..„./,/-/,,,/_//_,..v_.•/.,/:,.,>--_7,.//„..,, f:..-:„.1./;":.„..-,/.,,./-„/;..7i,/7-,/,,/:•_/.;:/,f/:.•,,,/"7.,,.,4/• 4 ``\\` \\ \\�\ \\•\\ \ \ \ \\\ //\ / �' /'/ //// / w"�/ ram/ / / / \ \\ Y`\\,\\\ \.\ \'\ �M E N \ 2-- \ / r//` //, �i /%//r '}"' /.'' '"1-: /'' /'l: :: :/1: . / r.` = k `\\1,\ti ? 7L\ f 1 ,,��J\11'1 ' ///irr //�' /,/��� J err /// r j \\ \\\ `\,.\\\\\\\,\\\\\\,\\\.> \'C\`C,\y\�� ,r / L .J L.1 rl! ,.Y f/%�.y/ , '.f i��l�L.! i' '/ �y�-_ \\\\�`�� \\~ \\\ \\`\ \\ -,,\ \`` \\\\\' \\` \\ // ///y"/ // / // // / /'`/, `.1/ SEGMENT 2 \ \\ \ , , \ \ `, \\ \\ \ i , %; % !i /, / k r/ . \ w. a�aaa.a i .(aaaaa�iaaaaaaa�a. ��ia�aiaaatsa______ COMMENCING _ \ =� ` ` • . POINT `�'� ----SEGMENT 1 ( MAP 4 MAP 1 KEY MAP PATH; P:\SDSK\PROJ\98020\9820-WAEASM.DWG o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o '-'1v11- AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS PAGE 7 PLOTTED: 04-26-00 2000 060 2601085 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM S12'S6'03't SEGMENT 2 1,:L70 s; E 10.D0' } _ _�b?, in_ 3 S126.22 3"E S14'33'21"E ' 7`° °D Og. " I �� '•�� �— 42_,24'� vNl i IvNfl S12S503 E n I M '42"E 132. � 4/71 _ S143321 z �)\t �k�� �_ 59.72_ z 1 S25'O�i �,__. _ r L71 ? E 132.03' _ 5�6 k p�� y� L55 __ _ , : c� N14'33'21"W 101.09' .f -_ - i 76. %. . - ,-- _ ao 9.75 \ / 'ys L56 53.06-. A N2 'OS 6'42"W 80.32 J `'59 /N25O42"W i: T N14'33'21"W 108.81' _�72 1:71'118-$.3-=ft5-'5.174:0*1 �N12 55 03"W �' 33. 34' 76�TX' e) k �, L54 L57L7 A. \s�T� TPOB FOR SEGMENT 2 v � S16'32'28"E 152.56' SCAL?s�j `T/.� "bas 31.49 N16'32'28"W 153.90' a N33'34'19"E N25'09' . cs '_.� J - 1A�1229'p2' �� � � � 72• MM ri - - - - - - - - - - - - Ra1302-�5,\..................., _ M �33' L�268 74 TPOB ��2 ' CIA=11'49 23 R=1302. FOR SEGME • A=0019'38 R=13.02.33' .4. ---- -- — — — --- — — —— _-- -- L=15.61' ' • MAP 1 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROJ\98020\9820-WAEASM.DWG o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o °NI- CONSULTANTS PAGE 8 PLOTTED: 04-26-00 2000 060 2001085 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MI I S24'40'29"E I — — ---� — — 3 ''_"� ,: S07 03'19" - . . - MMMI - - . - "cam R•,� _._/ y� N ; �` S34..L 3 . i - , , .�> N07.03. v IN Sib 5744E 193.27' N24'40'29"W 4, x5 56 �� N16'57'44"W 189.36' 1\ ~ /.:• ij 10.18 > ' r �6 L18 N34'28'33"W �1 3 SEGMENT 1 I bI ! N. of I*M SCALE: 1"=50' el 15"' 0 '''1135 c�I ; "°ter n 1 lao Z) { en"p - SEGMENT 2 \ I � � S12'55'03`E S1706'44"E 10.00' c'� 48.80_ 29, +14' n 3 S12'S5'03"E 6, )� �0?�6 ,v�i oo j 6.22 S14'33'21"E �' �� i\ a._L8 �...__, r 9•H, `- 'rl 1;i :t 42_24' -' -� — S12'55'03"E E en I . '42"E 132.98 �- f — 14'33'21"E L6 ''P , „z .. b9.72' z �5 MAP 2 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROJ\98020\9820-WAEASM.DWG o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o LT PAGE 9 PLOTTED: 04-26-00 2000 060 2001085 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM So7,03'19" �E�140440. SEGMENT 1 9 �— �4e g4. f SCALE: 1 =50 137.24' r_ \ Sp4 47 g1"E N00'39'17"W .� :.0` ` At** 8.55' N ?7 p'�- S08 54 " L3?'` �`�9'17•�, 6Q 1g_�-�'._.-. � �E�109.70• No44751"w � _�__ _ �38 ` ` � \::: i''� / 4' S29'51'S4"W \� 34.89' Na\ IT ••96,--r\\ 1, N5?11 p. I W,0 RI, ; R?Sg��\ �0�� ;' 820'42'S4"W iv Nco I , 1N il.,i. 17.23 � :,,,,r: 0�''� � ! �'� SEGMENT 2 �` , � S31'15 28 E S14'33'21"E 132.03_ — Z ; �^ \y--, L 80835.46"E---- .r.__.-- L7� — �6.21' S1417'09"E _SOT L84 �'15�28•E `_ S13'41'39"E108_04 ,c " _ _96_33' S9'42"EM �n N14'33 21 W 108.81 __1` T 4g ao ao S 8'23'0 E L68 L721 , r; 1� �� 1 — — L - 45.7 rz -' 96.25 # Y _ L82 _--- ! w�. ', w N13'41'39 MAP 3 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROJ\98020\9820-WAEASM.DWG o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. opLANNIN0 00NeuLT PAGE 10 PLOTTED: 04-26-00 • 2000 060 2601085 WATER EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WM S .,\• , N -...,,„,...... ti'pA \ :rI- eotrw `. ?' \o,��� -' S20 42'S4"W __ SCALE: 1"=50' 0:1HII,I "!---y 3 <?*�, \ 17.23 li 111 SEGMENT 2 \'.. S31'15 28 E It '!� 9p "1 S13.41'39"E S14'17'09"E L84 O/'"f" - - S07' 20"E `er S13.41'39"E 108.04' ! j 25.97 ___96.33' `- 411. 92?.E J n S18'23'05"E S3�1 �g, J J ;!! S07'06' �_J 67.62' _ y —'� - — — _ _ L7g -- —96.5 R»7 L82 j I`, _ r __ ----- . �7.8=E - �: 87 x J N13'41'39"W 119 81' N14'17'09"W L77 x� i L -, __ . ' l81 .1 4g8"w -- 1 J i `n 07- i, .,!,sV0-C3P.„\_ G N18'23'05 W 89.88 N3�152 21.18 \1 L92 194--/ 4,653"W 3 .,.. - 1> L79 N31'15'28"W 11 r` �' SEGMENT 2 \ > ��"1 \ \�'s N 18'13'20"W I Ak 1-- AIASIN TcN RI `,`fl NN,l 15.77I MAP 4 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROJ\98020\9820-WAEASM.DWG o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o C1v1L ENGWEERUVG AND , PLANNING CONSULTANTS PAGE 11 PLOTTED: 04-26-00 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: City of Renton Attention: City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way 01 0 0 0 111 0 0 0 11 Renton,WA 98055 20000526000715 TRANSNATION TI DECL 13.00 PAGE 001 OF 006 05/26/2000 10:37 KING COUNTY, WA DOCUMENT TITLE(S): C6C-1 '4 1 J Declaration of Restrictions co 13 — GRANTOR (last name, first name, middle initial): FILED FOR RECORD Al [HE HEUUEST OF Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO. U.S. Bank National Association GRANTEE (last name, first name, middle initial): r-- 0 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (abbreviated: lot, block, plat or section,township, range): Lf7 cz, Portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining o Lots 39, 40 and 41 of Eldon Acres, as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, records of King County, Washington, together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining Portion of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the NW 1/4 of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., as situate within the Plat of Eldon Acres as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Rats, pages 86A and 86B, records of King County,Washington Additional legal description begins on page: 5 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL OR ACCOUNT NUMBER: 229650-0200-06 REFERENCE NUMBER(S) OF DOCUMENTS ASSIGNED OR RELEASED: Document No. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS This Declaration of Restrictions(this"Declaration"),dated October Iq , 1999, is executed by Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership ("Declarant"). 1. Background. Declarant owns Tamaron Pointe (the "Community"), a 182-unit residential community located on a site situated in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, and described on Exhibit A to this Declaration. In order to satisfy concerns of the City of Renton (the"City") about use of garages that are part of the Community, Declarant has agreed to impose restrictions as provided in this Declaration. 2. Use Restriction. Declarant hereby declares that the Community is subject to the following restriction: The garage that is part of a residential unit and the driveway apron immediately in front of such garage may be used for parking only by the occupants of such residential unit and the guests of such occupants. Such restriction does not apply to common area parking spaces(i.e. those parking spaces not inside a garage or the driveway apron immediately in front of a garage). Such restriction shall run with the Community and shall be binding upon any person having or acquiring any interest in the Community. 3. Enforcement. The restriction imposed by this Declaration may be enforced only by the person who, at the time is the fee owner of the Community. In no event will the occupant of any residential unit within the Community be liable for damages on account of a violation of such restriction. 4. Miscellaneous. This Declaration may be amended only by a written instrument executed by the fee owner of the Community and the City. This Declaration shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Failure to enforce the 0 restriction imposed by this Declaration shall not be deemed a waiver of such restriction. TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, o its general partner 0 By: TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc., a Texas corpora ' n, its general partner By: Dougl L. Daley, Vic President 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON § COUNTY OF KING § On October(' 1999, before me appeared Douglas L. Daley, to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say that he is the President of TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc. a Texas corporation, which is the sole general partner of TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, which is the sole general partner of Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, and that the said document was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation (acting in the capacity indicated) by authority of its board of directors, and he acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of said corporation (acting in such capacity) and the partnership acting as general partner(in its capacity as such) and the partnership that executed said instrument. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. [SEAL] _ ��......���ii (. 2,0")..teect.„)57• a9-0--04-) tue 9Jotary Public Commission expires: ; ? ,aj (/��\ 1/1 (5. I °"—c am e' etw , �'�A'' Print Name of Notary Public O c.o L.C) N 3 U.S. Bank National Association ("Bank"), hereby subordinates to this Declaration of Restrictions and the interests and rights created hereby the Deed of Trust, Including Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases, and Fixture Financing Statement, dated June 24, 1999, from Grantor for the benefit of Bank, which has been recorded as Document No. [R4906214001651 in the Real Property Records of King County, Washington. U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By Name: "rie,01*s : 1l Title: Vice ) c'A-vr STATE OF (OA 58/u6 t uK § COUNTY OF c-- § On Octobero2 D , 1999, before me appeared MO Al A s 3'' ,9--2 y]}' yir4 to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say thata'she is the ( • i'i ss/d f#Jf _of U.S. Bank National Association, and that the foregoing document was signed in behalf of said association by authority of its board of directors, and he/she acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of said association. In testimony w ereof, I ave hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year last written above. [SEAL] " PON fvO ,Z‘ •• s\ss 6'• s' 0 NOTAR' ?: r,-1hlo ry ublic Commission expires: /i� Nam: P��:"1 69• o I# 9 29.02 (DI /0 1,- ***** tivAS14,'N. ch,) (00 r_5 cv Print Name of Notary Public cv 4 EXHIBIT A Legal Description: Parcel 1: That portion of government Lot 2 in Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., Lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard; Except that portion platted as Eldon Acres, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, :records of King County; And except any portion thereof lying Southerly and Easterly of those common boundary lines as established in that certain boundary line agreement filed under King County Recording No. 8509110605; Together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would attach by operation of law; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. Parcel 2: • Lots 39, 40, and 41 of Eldon Acres, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, Records of King County; CD Except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by Deed recorded under Recording No. 1020457; o Together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100`h Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would be attached by operation of law; o Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. Parcel 3: That portion of the North '/2 of the Southeast '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26, Eldon Acres, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, Records of King County; Thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning; -5- 1089684.2 Thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27, Eldon Acres, with the West line of the East V2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5; Thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, Records of King County; Thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning; Thence North to the true point of beginning; Except that portion thereof lying '_;asterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right- of-way (200 feet in width) of Pacific Coast Railroad Company; Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. Parcel 4: That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., having a width of 50 feet known as Pelly Place North (formerly 102" Place Southeast) as situate within the plat of Eldon Acres as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,pages 86A and 86B, Records of King County, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 28 of said plat; thence South 16° 57' 45" East along the Easterly right-of-way line of said street of 433.98 feet to the Southwest corner of up Lot 27 of said plat; Thence North 88° 37' 15" West a distance of 52.68 feet to the Southeast corner of vacated Southeast 100th Street (Formerly known as Mildred Avenue) Ordinance No. 1824; Thence North 16° 67' 45" West along the Westerly right-of-way line of said street a distance of 405.81 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 39; Thence North 59° 59' 06" East a distance of 51.33 feet to the true point of beginning; Except that portion thereof conveyed by Statutory Warranty Deed recorded November 23, 1987 under Recording No. 8711230876; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. -6- 1089684.2 111 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: City of Renton Attention: City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way 11 11 I III Renton, WA 98055 20000526000716 TRANSNATION TI DECL 18.00 PAGE 001 OF KI05NG6COUN000 TY, UA7 DOCUMENT TITLE(S): B( - Lf I i Declaration of Native Growth Protection Restriction III 1a --- GRANTOR(last name, first name, middle initial): Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership U.S. Bank National Association GRANTEE(last name, first name, middle initial)FILED FOR RECORD Al I hL REQUEST OF TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO. LID LEGAL DESCRIPTION(abbreviated: lot, block, plat or section,township, range): r-- Portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining Lots 39,40 and 41 of Eldon Acres,as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86, records of King County, Washington,together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining o Portion of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the NW 1/4 of Section 5, Township 23 North, CD Range 5 East, W.M., as situate within the Plat of Eldon Acres as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, pages 86A and 86B,records of King County, Washington Additional legal description begins on page: 5 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL OR ACCOUNT NUMBER: 229650-0200-06 REFERENCE NUMBER(S)OF DOCUMENTS ASSIGNED OR RELEASED: Document No. 111 DECLARATION OF NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION RESTRICTION For value received, Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership ("Grantor"), hereby covenants that the natural vegetation in the area described in Exhibit A attached hereto(the "Protection Area") shall be preserved and protected for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering,and protection of plant material and animal habitat(the"Protection Restriction"). The Protection Area includes the steep slope area within its confines. The Protection Restriction imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Protection Area an obligation to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the Protection Area. The vegetation within the Protection Area may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without express written permission from the City of Renton. The Protection Restriction shall run with the land and shall be binding on all present and future owners and occupiers of the Protection Area. TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, its general partner By: TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc., a Texas corporation, its general partner By: ou as L. Da y, Vice Presiden co 0 0 0 cn cv 0 N 2 111 STATE OF WASHINGTON § COUNTY OF KING § On December , 1999, before me appeared Douglas L. Daley,to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say that he is the Vice President of TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc. a Texas corporation,which is the sole general partner of TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership,which is the sole general partner of Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, and that the said document was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation(acting in the capacity indicated) by authority of its board of directors, and he acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of said corporation(acting in such capacity) and the partnership acting as general partner(in its capacity as such)and the partnership that executed said instrument. In witnes t'cc I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. 44, Tp _ _ , ', [SEAL] = _ ' V Notary Public B / 'rr'r 640.0s Commission expiregi, '44.r''++ &o +�F WASN� - 1 o - 03 u,��,n Print Name of Notary Public ca 0 t_rl . v . 3 U.S. Bank National Association ("Bank"), hereby subordinates to this Declaration of Restrictions and the interests and rights created hereby the Deed of Trust, Including Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases, and Fixture Financing Statement, dated June 24, 1999, from Grantor for the benefit of Bank, which has been recorded as Document No. 119104,2`i 00155/' in the Real Property Records of King County, Washington. U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By:,,.. 1e--, s Name: /Aiersi4Ls 37 4/..4-0z-T'v�-1-t.— Title: t/ic_ P.e s-/ Jr STATE OFtk.)/13tfrio G r ca^) § COUNTY OF /N § On October a-0, 1999, before me appeared 1 ff 0445 DN - )1))/laN s�t r ,_ to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say thashe is the (5 n 9 %v?MI- of U.S. Bank National Association, and that the foregoing document was signed in behalf of said association by authority of its board of directors, and he/she acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of s id association. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal t e a and year last written above. [SEAL] _PQ,....N \lv0 `tt to cn flr % O NOA '•• 8 ublic c� A °' ��/ N,\: PUBLIC ; a Commission expires: 0 -.7 ..0 d2 c, 11>��F wASH«�`a�O— o �i� 0 L `,�,,,. tfi9 ee or., 0(2 SC f.� `V / Print Name of Notary Public 4 11/ NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY OF THOSE COMMON BOUNDARY LINES AS ESTABLISHED IN THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT FILED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8509110605; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2: LOTS 39, 40 AND 41 OF ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 41 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1020457; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ca PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF a SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; c, BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26, ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE WEST 172 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; - , THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 27, ELDON ACRES, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 5, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; o THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY (200 FEET IN WIDTH) OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4: THAT PORTION OF A CITY OF RENTON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., HAVING A WIDTH OF 50 FEET KNOWN AS PELLY PLACE NORTH (FORMERLY 102ND PLACE SOUTHEAST) AS SITUATED WITHIN THE PLAT OF ELDON ACRES AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGES 86A AND 86B, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 28 AND SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 16'57'45" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 433.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAID PLAT; PAGE 5 11/ NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE NORTH 88'37'15" WEST A DISTANCE OF 52.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ORDINANCE NO. 1824; THENCE NORTH 16'67'45" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 405.81 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 39; THENCE NORTH 59'59'06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8711230876; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SAID PORTION IS A NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: EASEMENT 1 COMMENCING POINT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-A FOR EASEMENT 1 COINCIDES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE S59'59' 07"W A DISTANCE OF 25.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S46'56'16"W A DISTANCE OF 109.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N72'58'18"E A DISTANCE OF 123.04 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE N16'57'44"W A DISTANCE OF 53.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-A. EASEMENT 2 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A Lc) POINT; THENCE N73'02'16"E A DISTANCE OF 5.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-B; c� THENCE S16'59'15"E A DISTANCE OF 71.64 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S28'54'36"E A DISTANCE OF 96.32 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE N16'57'44"W FEET A DISTANCE OF 165.87 TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 19.97 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF cv BEGINNING-B. Ls" EASEMENT COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A N POINT; THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 189.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 42.36 FEET TO A TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING - C; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 131.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 111.95 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N88'48'21"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 816.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7'51'29" TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 4,24 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N73'57'03"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1532.66 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0'09'31" TO A POINT; THENCE FOLLOWING THE PROPERTY LINE N88'18'44"W A DISTANCE OF 57.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S00'37'16"W FEET A DISTANCE 474.48 TO A POINT; PAGE 6 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE N23'26'45"W A DISTANCE OF 41.11 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N13'06'30"W A DISTANCE OF 48.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N11'08'57"W A DISTANCE OF 56.05 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NO3'0553"W A DISTANCE OF 85.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N09'28'14"W A DISTANCE OF 63.06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NO2'50'58"W A DISTANCE OF 124.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING N10'50'46"W A DISTANCE OF 179.63 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-C. EASEMENT 4 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 189.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 174.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 111.95 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N88'48'21"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 816.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7'51'29" TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 4,24 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N73'57'03"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1532.66 cc) FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0'09'31" TO A POINT; o THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 57.99 FEET TO A POINT; =, THENCE S00'37'16"E A DISTANCE OF 497.32 FEET TO A TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-D; c_o THENCE S89'22'44"E A DISTANCE OF 31.51 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S28'13'39"W A DISTANCE OF 39.50 FEET TO A POINT; `" THENCE S00'06'41"W A DISTANCE OF 45.50 FEET TO A POINT; (-� THENCE SO6'52'26"E A DISTANCE OF 53.08 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S18'48'47"E A DISTANCE OF 62.86 FEET TO A POINT; (..=) THENCE N89'22'44"W A DISTANCE OF 21.57 FEET TO A POINT ON A PROPERTY LINE; cp THENCE RETURNING ALONG A PROPERTY LINE N 00'37'16"E A DISTANCE 192.39 FEET TO THE CV TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-D. 10:1"/i(414 4ycttifilliiti fi.. �i►09 18612 p 1f F0/STE%( \* t S119NA L C-* 4W2 .. kilt EXPIRES: MAY 6, 2001 PAGE 7 (-3 ( ) ( 2000 052 6000716 1 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE TP 0 B-D � \ SCALE P-30' I � I I I ' I I 21 .57' � / • L� L11 ' T - ► opb. � N89'22 44„W I � Ord •2 �31 .51 ' \\ kv , / Y / °j / / S89' 2'44" t .` �� / /w I / 9.50 WS650 - t�� j�� S281 39' W�- � 47 „ • , � �� S06' ' 8 _ 18'4 '47 '� / G \ / o S226„E > <4f2.86' --__ �c--- / j \/ EASEMENT 41 / MAP 3 PAGE 11 PATH: P:\SOSK\PROD\98020\9820-NAT1VEASM.DWG PLOTTED: 10-28-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o CrV ..,, ,,oE'''O n IU00 052 6 r, 716 1 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE - — 00'09'31• SCALE T-60' -� 1 o7•s 1532.66' �7 95 RS 816.27' ktr. �'� �r —•''. _ _—=-\ EASEMENT 3 ►► • 1 -4,go..„„1 „,„- 2.,..__ ........70000,.:__—__=-____-__ _ ---____=,--'‘,... ....N ,....',::.> .iii#4., ,...1013‘;10"0* ‘,.. . 7_-__---:2. .400.0.40. .,;.. ......",..." ...401.400101. slitco, NI N ----- --"=-_:---:_—_---- '-0/.._ - -41-44;.. ....s-_,-.7. 1.4...400, lip _,..... ......%,--__ ., ----,____— _,_._ 4 ) -- _____Alite...- --.. ..... ......i.e20401,„. ..-.___ ____ z z z cy58 ii, ....*::46.... — ....s ..,7:04-0.-- -:- — - /J r / / ( N0928',41 'W 1 \ \\ '-_ ?��Z`�:— _ / ( s3,ds` / 8s.sa' j 1 '�iL���— :.. �-'� �i 10B-0 / /NO3'05'S3"W \ 1 I I I — / , ( / (� ( N 115068'S;'W 1 -- -\� —� 1 I 1 ( /= I� / / \ 0 N13 06 30" 4n11' �� �%�� I / / a' 1 N23'26`45'W \:l/ / i MAP 2 PAGE 10 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROD\98020\9820-NATIVEASM.DWG PLOTTED: 10-28-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o CIVIL ENCINEERINCIT AND 0 0 (--' 2000 052 6000716 . ' I NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE MAP 2 TP OB—C i / \si ,, \ • COMMENCING • 's - - • 1111 kklb. • //1:14e 4 T` POINTl.:--_;; ;;I:---.;-r- ---• i t: /M AP 1 1 t..-e.::z:,.--r-..-Is- V-7 -'-r. .,,„._, ...,.. • ,..., TPOB—A •,?;;-_-;-_:,.•.,, .. .--,-"?.-- =%=::-.;=-2-'---"*.:". . _-..------t--------.. 14,-%,,-1rg, ..f._7-:::_,----_<•.:- V.N.,,IL-.....W.,:etityr ---_--------,:-:,1-..... . ---,-..i.-::,,,,_3:„... TPOB—D EXPIRES: MAY 6, 2001 4ffirgL 1:t..&.." .311:•f--1,,,,--...---,,-7-::---, -.14 =‹.-.::.:',7,1.t.--.-7--.i95:lin-•, A • ---,---,---------- -- ,_ _ _‘m ---1\*.rik \-Nwwl'----sli--\---, \--11",84k6 , ,,,,.. - .. , ‘.• EMIL la-4-Itetilaili7liStt-12!,r ,, lreak lit& itistir. itI\ I \ t --- -...-...,--•-••_,.1:-.... _2- - _• , - . ‘ •--; ; „ /e ../ki.,7-: ....,t Mt, I r I \ i i r ik N4111*,--4 -1&"%i: --ii.5. • ,- _/-- - \ „it- -7-z-.-,.......TE x__... i _} _., I 1 I - '1%hs Atil=6,\.Nali- -- .;;:'•=f., ' --,TP0a:--12 A ME-N T ,2 -.... _ '. —1-- N;,:•... \ ; ____`-7;5- I\)1,___,,- i ,,-- if. ,/ il ,E.A 5E EN T 4 / I / SCALE Iwo' ......, s,-- , ,___ __-_-_„4.i.c.-;,..-,.-2-, -, , , s, \ -„,..-- - 6 N '.:1...%... 1 I (---%:err7:;, -,---.- 3--4-S*A. '474 i ) I ,./ / /.......,"1 , ' / ii-.,j ,t t/ ... \A / t h 1 % .-'1 --r.'' ,.... ,_ / / 1 r.,_ ......./ _ l' /1 I - -- i , , (r r z .) 1 -‘. r-7,--fit,:.4..-4---,7:-.-.-_- ----. - -, v_;_.,_,...-,.,.-:-...-:,.--.„:::,-_-__7-,-_-5,-,..-_-„ ,., , _v _..,,- -------.'sk...„-......---_-:-.4- -,-------_*_ -,-....„__,_ . - - _ -- , _ .......„-,..„--__—______:____„._,..,...„. ,.-.4:..‘ *3-7---;--,----7-_--.fit-----,-------- .,--..... 3eff _:.-__-_-.- ---- ---,____.,.._.,.._- ____— - __ - .-, C___ -:-,,-,--1-:--:. -L--..-----)---•\ •--........ ...--- , - ,, .. 1 i A .../- ... t i s 164,1p T KEY MAP PAGE 8 PA1H: PASDSK\PRO198020\9820-NA11VEAS14DWG PLOTTED: 10-28-99 !=.1 .=' PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC.'=. .=:= clvil-pLANNINGIclooNem.TANTBAND 2000 052 600071 n,;a 1 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE // /77.- =_- S73'02'16"W � //// Z COMMENCING — — — 19.97' _✓—�/ /�j/�/ °�� POINT __=- _ _ � _� /// mac/!'= \5 sC`'//� � ��--'184.77` — _ 1g„E 96.3 `' f �� r '` 1 9 671.64' _ 52g•� i �' ��� 00 EASEMENT 1 1 \ i \ �\ \ti' I F; ` -__ -__ ` --- --___ ` — _1 __ EASMENTii .__1.,lid e 2� N '.\a' ', -co-- -\goo > _ \ _ / OM in • /\ (.1 ( ) \ MAP 1 PAGE 9 PATH: P:\SOSK\PROD\98020\9820-NATIVEASAI.DWG PLOTTED: 10-28-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC.o T AND AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: City of Renton Attention: City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way 0 0 0 01 111 0 0 11 Renton,WA 98055 20000526000715 TRANSNATION TI DECL 13.00 PAGE 001 OF 006 05/26/2000 10:37 KING COUNTY, WA DOCUMENT TITLE(S): 1 M: 7 `�- I J Declaration of Restrictions bl A — GRANTOR(last name, first name, middle initial): FILED FOR RECORD Al fHt REQUEST OF Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO. U.S. Bank National Association "' GRANTEE(last name, first name, middle initial): 0 c= c� LtD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (abbreviated: lot, block, plat or section, township, range): 1.11 cz, Portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining o Lots 39, 40 and 41 of Eldon Acres, as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, records of King County, Washington, together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining Portion of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the NW 1/4 of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., as situate within the Plat of Eldon Acres as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, pages 86A and 86B, records of King County, Washington Additional legal description begins on page: 5 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL OR ACCOUNT NUMBER: 229650-0200-06 REFERENCE NUMBER(S) OF DOCUMENTS ASSIGNED OR RELEASED: Document No. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS This Declaration of Restrictions(this"Declaration"),dated October l9 , 1999, is executed by Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership ("Declarant"). 1. Background. Declarant owns Tamaron Pointe (the "Community"), a 182-unit residential community located on a site situated in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, and described on Exhibit A to this Declaration. In order to satisfy concerns of the City of Renton (the"City")about use of garages that are part of the Community, Declarant has agreed to impose restrictions as provided in this Declaration. 2. Use Restriction. Declarant hereby declares that the Community is subject to the following restriction: The garage that is part of a residential unit and the driveway apron immediately in front of such garage may be used for parking only by the occupants of such residential unit and the guests of such occupants. Such restriction does not apply to common area parking spaces(i.e. those parking spaces not inside a garage or the driveway apron immediately in front of a garage). Such restriction shall run with the Community and shall be binding upon any person having or acquiring any interest in the Community. 3. Enforcement. The restriction imposed by this Declaration may be enforced only by the person who, at the time is the fee owner of the Community. In no event will the occupant of any residential unit within the Community be liable for damages on account of a violation of such restriction. `" 4. Miscellaneous. This Declaration may be amended only by a written instrument executed by the fee owner of the Community and the City. This Declaration shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Failure to enforce the o restriction imposed by this Declaration shall not be deemed a waiver of such restriction. N TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Lr) a By: TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, o its general partner `v By: TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc., a Texas corpora n, its general partner By: Dougl L. Daley, Vic President 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON § § COUNTY OF KING § On October , 1999, before me appeared Douglas L. Daley, to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say that he is the President of TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc. a Texas corporation, which is the sole general partner of TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, which is the sole general partner of Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, and that the said document was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation (acting in the capacity indicated) by authority of its board of directors, and he acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of said corporation (acting in such capacity) and the partnership acting as general partner(in its capacity as such) and the partnership that executed said instrument. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. [SEAL] ........••‘‘.%%I. i .;. 0 s.,„,..,,,,„,,, 4_„ aer>t,e, , 1, 6a_-•i-) Notary Public 4. S i Commission expires: ; �Oy�`� jCcly D1 �OCDc2. :1i1+ri:76:t7N1rn::?„:11Pr4/inrilNate �J . e of Notary Public ix" 0 O O CM CV LC) O O O O CV 3 U.S. Bank National Association ("Bank"), hereby subordinates to this Declaration of Restrictions and the interests and rights created hereby the Deed of Trust, Including Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases, and Fixture Financing Statement, dated June 24, 1999, from Grantor for the benefit of Bank, which has been recorded as Document No. 44906214001551' in the Real Property Records of King County, Washington. U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By: mod -2 Name: .". ?n4-s s ,t�e7--/A/ .tr.4.__ Title: Bice ) e c/A .vr STATE OF ((-)A58(1)6r u,/ § (� § COUNTY OF On Octoberc2& , 1999, before me appeared TO-0 M A s - ') i4 CZ a 9 to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say that0she is the U s/d fNf- _of U.S. Bank National Association, and that the foregoing document was signed in behalf of said association by authority of its board of directors, and he/she acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of said association. In testimony w e eof, I ave hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year last written above. [SEAL] Q,PO ° NOTARi flo ry ublic m: to• c Commission expires: '• R, `n 9) •292, 1 :i` 4-7 k� WASj- (E (00g SL £� �., Print Name of Notary Public 0 cv 4 EXHIBIT A Legal Description: Parcel 1: That portion of government Lot 2 in Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., Lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard; Except that portion platted as Eldon Acres, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, :records of King County; And except any portion thereof lying Southerly and Easterly of those common boundary lines as established in that certain boundary line agreement filed under King County Recording No. 8509110605; Together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would attach by operation of law; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. Parcel 2: • Lots 39, 40, and 41 of Eldon Acres, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, o Records of King County; Except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by Deed recorded under Recording No. 1020457; CV url Together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would be attached by operation of law; 0 a Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. Parcel 3: That portion of the North '/z of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26, Eldon Acres, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, Records of King County; Thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning; -5- 1089684.2 Thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27, Eldon Acres, with the West line of the East '/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 5; Thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, Records of King County; Thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning; Thence North to the true point of beginning; Except that portion thereof lying '_;asterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right- of-way (200 feet in width) of Pacific Coast Railroad Company; Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. Parcel 4: That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest '/<of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,having a width of 50 feet known as Pelly Place North(formerly 102hd Place Southeast) as situate within the plat of Eldon Acres as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,pages 86A and 86B, Records of King County, described as follows: o Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 28 of said plat; thence South 16° 57' 45" East along the Easterly right-of-way line of said street of 433.98 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 27 of said plat; Thence North 88° 37' 15" West a distance of 52.68 feet to the Southeast corner of vacated CD Southeast 100th Street (Formerly known as Mildred Avenue) Ordinance No. 1824; CD Thence North 16° 67' 45" West along the Westerly right-of-way line of said street a distance of 405.81 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 39; Thence North 59° 59' 06" East a distance of 51.33 feet to the true point of beginning; Except that portion thereof conveyed by Statutory Warranty Deed recorded November 23, 1987 under Recording No. 8711230876; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. -6- 1089684.2 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: City of Renton Attention: City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 20000526000716 TRANSNATION 011DECL 18.00 KING6COUNTY,1 WA DOCUMENT TITLE(S): B 7"7 L I i Declaration of Native Growth Protection Restriction GRANTOR(last name, first name, middle initial): Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership U.S. Bank National Association GRANTEE(last name, first name, middle initial).FILED FOR RECURU Al I HE REQUEST OF TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO. LiD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (abbreviated: lot, block,plat or section, township, range): r-- Portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining Lots 39,40 and 41 of Eldon Acres,as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, records of King County, Washington,together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining L o Portion of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the NW 1/4 of Section 5, Township 23 North, o Range 5 East, W.M.,as situate within the Plat of Eldon Acres as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, pages 86A and 86B, records of King County, Washington Additional legal description begins on page: 5 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL OR ACCOUNT NUMBER: 229650-0200-06 REFERENCE NUMBER(S)OF DOCUMENTS ASSIGNED OR RELEASED: Document No. DECLARATION OF NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION RESTRICTION For value received, Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership,a Texas limited partnership ("Grantor"), hereby covenants that the natural vegetation in the area described in Exhibit A attached hereto(the "Protection Area") shall be preserved and protected for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability,visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant material and animal habitat(the"Protection Restriction"). The Protection Area includes the steep slope area within its confines. The Protection Restriction imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Protection Area an obligation to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the Protection Area. The vegetation within the Protection Area may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without express written permission from the City of Renton. The Protection Restriction shall run with the land and shall be binding on all present and future owners and occupiers of the Protection Area. TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, its general partner By: TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc., a Texas corporation, its general partner By: ou as L. Da y, Vice Presiden CD CD CD CV CID CD L� L�7 N 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON § COUNTY OF KING § On December q 1999, before me appeared Douglas L. Daley,to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say that he is the Vice President of TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc. a Texas corporation,which is the sole general partner of TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, which is the sole general partner of Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, and that the said document was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation(acting in the capacity indicated) by authority of its board of directors, and he acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of said corporation(acting in such capacity) and the partnership acting as general partner(in its capacity as such)and the partnership that executed said instrument. In witnes.m4 o(cp'i I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. _.- Tp 401 [SEAL] CIA\ = _ % V i Notary Public p i 'I). 6 1o`j ;,= ? Commission expirek '44. -- Op W ASO 6 io - o3 1 1 (MC-, . Print Name of Notary Public co 0 LCD N L.C') • O N 3 U.S. Bank National Association("Bank"), hereby subordinates to this Declaration of Restrictions and the interests and rights created hereby the Deed of Trust, Including Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases, and Fixture Financing Statement, dated June 24, 1999, from Grantor for the benefit of Bank, which has been recorded as Document No. 1191 Z'i 00 t SST" in the Real Property Records of King County, Washington. U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By Name:•T/ ,144s T. rN.tR7-i", Title: the.. P,ee-c,D T STATE OF ��S/f r i rc § COUNTY OF (N�- § On October a-cJ, 1999, before me appeared 1 ff O U S J 1R rN s r to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say tha�`�'she is the C 5 n ss v stir of U.S. Bank National Association, and that the foregoing document was signed in behalf of said association by authority of its board of directors, and he/she acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of s id association. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal t e a and year last written LID above. o [SEAL] _P RO N 0t, / • 0 Y m' ublic i n �� Nam'• pUOLIC C Commission expires: r,� 6, o 1����FwASH1�`'� ~' oKids 9/0 �.,., _-.- (41 79 vv..) 0(2 S( Print Name of Notary Public 4 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY OF THOSE COMMON BOUNDARY LINES AS ESTABLISHED IN THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT FILED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8509110605; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2: LOTS 39, 40 AND 41 OF ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 41 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1020457; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. UD PARCEL 3: `- THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF o SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26, ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE WEST 172 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; - . THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 27, ELDON o ACRES, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, LLD DIVISION NO. 5, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; `D THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; cv THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY (200 FEET IN WIDTH) OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4: THAT PORTION OF A CITY OF RENTON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., HAVING A WIDTH OF 50 FEET KNOWN AS PELLY PLACE NORTH (FORMERLY 102ND PLACE SOUTHEAST) AS SITUATED WITHIN THE PLAT OF ELDON ACRES AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGES 86A AND 86B, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 28 AND SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 16'57'45" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 433.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAID PLAT; PAGE 5 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE NORTH 88'37'15" WEST A DISTANCE OF 52.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ORDINANCE NO. 1824; THENCE NORTH 16'67'45" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 405.81 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 39; THENCE NORTH 59'59'06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8711230876; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SAID PORTION IS A NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: EASEMENT 1 COMMENCING POINT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-A FOR EASEMENT 1 COINCIDES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY UNE S59'59' 07"W A DISTANCE OF 25.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S46'56'16"W A DISTANCE OF 109.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N72'58'18"E A DISTANCE OF 123.04 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE N16'57'44"W A DISTANCE OF 53.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-A. EASEMENT 2 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A Lc, POINT; THENCE N73'02'16"E A DISTANCE OF 5.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-B; THENCE S16'59'15"E A DISTANCE OF 71.64 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S28'54'36"E A DISTANCE OF 96.32 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE N16'57'44"W FEET A DISTANCE OF 165.87 TO A POINT; `D THENCE RETURNING S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 19.97 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-B. �"', EASEMENT 3 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY UNE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 189.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 42.36 FEET TO A TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING - C; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 131.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 111.95 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N88'48'21"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 816.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7'51'29" TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 4,24 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N73'57'03"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1532.66 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0'09'31" TO A POINT; THENCE FOLLOWING THE PROPERTY LINE N8818'44"W A DISTANCE OF 57.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S00'37'16"W FEET A DISTANCE 474.48 TO A POINT; PAGE 6 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE N23'26'45"W A DISTANCE OF 41.11 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N13'06'30"W A DISTANCE OF 48.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N11'08'57"W A DISTANCE OF 56.05 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NO3'05'53"W A DISTANCE OF 85.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N09'28'14"W A DISTANCE OF 63.06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NO2'50'58"W A DISTANCE OF 124.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING N10'50'46"W A DISTANCE OF 179.63 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-C. EASEMENT k COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 189.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 174.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 111.95 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N88'48'21"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 816.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7'51'29" TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 4,24 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N73'57'03"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1532.66 UD FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF O'09'31" TO A POINT; r- THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 57.99 FEET TO A POINT; o THENCE S00'37'16"E A DISTANCE OF 497.32 FEET TO A TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-D; UD THENCE S89'22'44"E A DISTANCE OF 31.51 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S28'13'39"W A DISTANCE OF 39.50 FEET TO A POINT; ' THENCE S00'06'41"W A DISTANCE OF 45.50 FEET TO A POINT; cp THENCE SO6'52'26"E A DISTANCE OF 53.08 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S18'48'47"E A DISTANCE OF 62.86 FEET TO A POINT; LID THENCE N89'22'44"W A DISTANCE OF 21.57 FEET TO A POINT ON A PROPERTY UNE; THENCE RETURNING ALONG A PROPERTY LINE N 00'37'16"E A DISTANCE 192.39 FEET TO THE cv TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-D. /EN 4(/ e pi,i /4,4:.R 1 iliA,i 6. 4, 18612 p «� ��xS�ONA L�E ENc,\�� EXPIRES: MAY 6, 2001 PAGE 7 2000 052 6000716 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE MAP 2 ,;•E6 , o/ .I p i 244 F y IA/ COMMENCING \\::t\\\\\X\ \ fs\S\E‘ L-\ ''\11k, N\ \ t iii 1! POINT _ '� MAP 1 ;, r' �`. _ \ � //= sue'�,i, � /s•4.i"aAS\.. \.\\� Ki t�l _ / A_- . - E-r r" ,.•4s � > -- TP 0 B—D GI s: MAY 6, 2001 , _� Est_ ;--- -•.:JI:r+ _-"s"/ t� +-'�r, _ ��• 1 / / / —\LI +<1.ems='J�\11144‘ Ilh 11%-i 'IR \ .�.aVIP �; \ ..o._,.,:.�,.''� MAP 3 \`. r ' -\ ,, -.;� =__sue/ /! A\,1 I J // I I 4 J \ �^' r�'''''';a...., ' N 1 .�POB;yJ1111pAx . 4._ A MINT , �^ -= == — ---pi x �, ___ 1 c EASgAkN 17 1: - c- ....I ,EASE E�1T 4 ,; / pvMLG• 1•1 ' ,/�\� �/ - �_" �_ `/ / 1 I I r �,�\ i f /il/ / \ JJ i j \� y I i��� —_ ____ J J / ) J / / /_ ! �.�\/ ) / ,- _-_\\"�/ II I \I 1 ( J \ lj —� 's • _ -_/ 1 _�� _" /-_ \) / I \\ V. li 1 /// / - __¢ r \ ` / t ' II ill If KEY MAP PAGE 8 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROJ\98020\9820-NAT1VEASM.DWG PLOTTED: 10-28-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. oPLANNING CONSULTANTS 2000 052 6000716 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE / ; %/ — „ /// S73 02 16 W � �// / -- 19.97' // //� � & COMMENCING _ /�// \ I -- ______ ---- ----- ----12------ ----...--------p-------_- ___----------_--- --- ---_-:--_-----,-- --/ .7, -V,-8 6,', - 9 / CO - N53 . :4/-� ���-'--'184.7-7` = ' - _ a• 36��E 6. i / / w- - - - - - - � 1 9 �71.6"4' • S-• / / ✓ ' `^ EASEMENT 1 ` \ / / / �� ;) 1* I N7 '02'16"E // / f \ /� / \ \ \ � � � \ �� 1 � EMENTZ // 4P 1I ���.� / / ' 4" oo rpp lii l� N / \ n / 1 1 / \ \ \ .------ ---__ _____ \ )>G___ -----_- _,J„ 1 Wm..=11.4101/L\ \\„._,\ „...// \ / \:( '\ \ �� / �` MAP 1 PAGE 9 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROJ\98020\9820-NATIVEASM.DWG PLOTTED: 10-28-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o tam, cEPIGINot4E81:1T 2`'`' " OSZ 1) 000716 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE s= 00'09'31" SCALE r-60' 07 51'29" L= 4.24' `� ,L=a L9 1532.66" s.. �R= 816.27' 1 N. _ ms �:' �_ EASEMENT 3 a r t►" `�`4! .1.� , ''� — _ f =\\., \� 2040/ 0*11-6 - ' `W------- N ---- ..# .* . -:; ' N -- ------ ' -;(1 , -"...rep-...,- --" ,,,=1_,--ft--_,..÷.--. 01:04, fol',Sitt-....--- --A,,,..T.„-------z--7-_-_-_-_-_---_____--_ Xmt0 TPOB-C N 20 -sue �.a� � - / / t? ,90' , fi �s 3 . 3r — f/ / / ) oo #3 seer '��► r / ( N09'28,(114"W I / - - NJ / / 63,06' / 85.901' "�r__AG"- ..,....t` — I ~ / _ \ 1/NO3'05'S'3"W 1 ` I 1 l / // 1 7" N11'08'S "W _‘ \ 11 o I I ( 1 1 / ( 1 56 o N13�6'30" 41\11' b \— // 1 / / ) 7 I ° N23'26'45"W \ '\ ,� MAP 2 PAGE 10 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROD\98020\9820-NAl1VEASM.DWG PLOTTED: 10-28-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC, oPLANNING CONSULTANTS 2000 052 6000716 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE ;.241144P4,,s. _ TPOB-D - ° - -- --1-7 .-.-y , � ' scams:rya I 21 . 57' L\ Iloll � j N89'22'44"W 0 ,!- . ATO,b.t, \ ---- �'45"W � � 0 / 0 ,X1OP 0. 9 3“ Yi 4TO4 0440011'0' . 1 I -Y / / //i z31 . 51 ESN o „4",1 ---— -r---f1 „„..--- //2/ S89° 2'4 •_'' '`'�'� / �� / / / c 4 E �i����►' / 9. 5 0' e ° S• SO' _ �"'L / // S2 ° 006 , . _" 4, � � i /8 1 3 9 W / - 4 7 "1,1, 5 -g, _ - - -�-._._ , . S ° S18°48�47 �,o 06 52 26°°E / I '2.86' / EASEMENT 41 \___-. / \ MAP 3 PAGE 11 PATH: PASDSK\PRO198020\9820-NATIVEASM.DWG PLOTTED: 10-28-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o ,CIT,AND NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINT >>— — _�_ TP 0 B-D SCALE:r-30' ::___7 .,::::-- --->-:- :::"........ir. --....\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ � � � � \ 1 o � I � � N89'22.'44"W 345 W \ 1.51 , ,..4 0 /� �� S89'22'44"E —_ — _ — j �i// S28'13'39"W 06 4/"W ., 5 .08 - S18' ���/ �� 06-52'26,, /62.86 7 . / 4 ( \ — -'" / ( _-- / ' EASEMENT 4j MAP 3 PAGE 7 PATh: P:\SDSK\PROD\98020\9820-NATIVEASAI.DWG PLOTTED: 10-11-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIQN INC.o -_aT M a NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINT MAP 2 TPOB-C \ \\\ \\\\�� �� \ \\ \\\ '�i 1 q►lt,, COMMENCING \ \ \EA$ End \' \ i Ip`°. 4e;, , . POINT - -- \ tififf/i P�/ MAP 1 __- p Ik f 18612 �p �4, TPOB-A ��S�NALTCENG\ \\ - ' /fir - .4.4 ' - - TPOB-D IMIRES MAY 6, 2001 \ . : , \:.\\\'\A.. , ;‘,, ! 1 , / / , , . ', // MAP 3 _, ,=woe.; ' t E--fT-_.s•--'fk ,_ MINT 2/ r ,�=;�-a.�—=_ =2-• ,S- y^ - ,, .`��- Cam* 1�VyF()�-N�` }: ,- ,i-, f, �iAEr / \ mac'7-=__=_ __- ! I �/ / �+ /\ f ir \ lJ '.�.4/ 1 1 J pr r l rT 1 i J 1 J f/',i ‘ ..4 J i//^ _ ice. a'_ . :f % " 1 r' , fl J "At. r KEY NAP PAGE 4 PATH: P:\SDSK\PROD\98020\9820-NAI1AEASLIDWG PLOTTED: 10-11-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC.a a"- ANC) o RMNVO CONeULTMlTe NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINT s73 02'1 s"w / /////�� ///// o� COMMENCING �_ — — = 19'� f �j� // POINL� _ —= '� ��� f_/ //ffi5�' _ �_ �-w�� ���/ 44,1 _ _ /TP A�//A ��� _ �� _z --1 86 . � S . � ,- c ! �— — , g6 „ix- ,,.1 ,r --� 18 2'536E / / ' �/ / - 8 � • EASEMENT 1 l \ � �� 1ii I \ N7 '02'16"E // A ,�A J 503' � — / / 1.$/ °I ' � / _ _ A MENT 2/ / / � \ ) N._ _____. , -,._.%cp , ...„----M700 ,i — --, ---N V i N /,_ / t` , , . IIAP 1 PAGE 5 PATH: P:\SD51(\PR0.1\98020\9820-NAIIVEA511.DNG PLOTTED: 10-11-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC.: T AKp ' ,NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINT 00 R. 4.24'931. -_ � 'S326 , SCALE:T-60' 07'51'29' z _ � -DAP 11 95'R. 816.27'�- \ sti. • t. 4101._,t6‘-7„•-0•t.,e.S..4w \ -EASEMENT 3 t-c4sW_itSS_�4„''QT-sir'.5c46:'--179 ..-__ '''`417-,-"-'0'Z'2.: .t2-: - k — 0...•-------'..;.__ .,_..4 0 s 1 ir''.,_,..._•••..._.--4 0:0 0 1,,,,..4 PIL...... .---'--... .. .... ........z......-s--.. ...._.."-:..c.-.....4 IA-..._,..woe..1..4,,...;el".it..47....- ,....."------=---------:'-----.., ---------'------.,-._-____-=---_,_,_-.__ . 3 / / / / 'a �c, - �r 3 --/ SO9284-E J l�7 = =2—' / 63.6 --IN, - -�POB-0 85.90 / * IIIo I`- / /S03'05jy3"E S71'08' "E -- ---- 1 _ / / / ( \ / I56. ' 4 11'o S1Y0630" N2326"45'W \s'- . MAP 2 PAGE 6 PATH: P:\SOSK\PROD\98020\9820-NATIVEASM.OwG PLOTTED: 10-tt-99 o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC.o CIVILIEN°11413Thacce"uLTANTBAND, Si+-3'S — IZ3 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 20000522001420 CITY OF RENTON R 9.00 PAGE 001 OF 002 05/22/2000 14:31 KING COUNTY, WA RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Property Tax Parcel Number. 229650-200 Project File#: R-090-081 (Lake Terrace Park Associates Street Intersection: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard Rezone) North Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. City of Renton 1. Alex Cugini,Jr.,J. Steve Harer LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M,.in King County,Washington,lying Easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard;except that portion platted as Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;together with that �► portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law. o Parcel B: Lots 39,40,and 41,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 1020457;together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street(formerly known as Mildred N Avenue)adjoining,that would attach by operation of law,together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under u r City of Renton Ordinance No.3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. o Parcel C: That portion of Lot 28,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King o County,Washington lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot,distant being 122 o feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot,being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property operation e byo eration of law. Parcel D: Lot 27,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats,page 86,in King county, Washington;together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North,under City of Renton Ordinance No.3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. Parcel E: That portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M,in King County,Washington,described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26,Eldon Acres,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,in King County,Washington;thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning;thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27,Eldon Acres,with the West line of the Fast half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5:thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden,Division No.5,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 83,in King County,Washington;thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning;thence North to the true point of beginning;except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the Westerly margin of the abandoned right-of-way(200 feet in width)of Pacific Coast Railroad Company. Whereas the Grantee,as named above,is the holder of a restrictive covenant acquired from the above named Grantor dated December 12, 1983 and recorded under Recording Number 8312050533 of King County,State of Washington; and WHEREAS,the City of Renton,Washington did require certain restrictive covenant as a condition of approval for the rezoning of the subject property in 1983;and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants require certain off site improvements or restrict development of the site;and, WHEREAS;said restrictive covenants applied to the then current zoning;and, WHEREAS,the zoning of this site has subsequently changed;and, WHEREAS,said restrictive covenants have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property;and, WHEREAS,the City Council authorized the removal of the restrictive covenants on March 20,2000; NOW,THEREFORE,the City of Renton does hereby authorize the release of the restrictive covenants described above on the land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said City has caused this instrument to be executed this I('day of 206Q . A OF�If /p,�/ City of Renton I �eV. 2 = d * Sit;, % *= Jesse er,Mayor • • rED SEA\\6� ?)14(, _/\\\\ v ''I\_ � Marilyn Pet=,Zo ty Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that-Jew.. Tito r,e r- and '('( x i\@ n Pe�e r'Se�11 signed this instrument and acknowledg d that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the (NA/Or and OA �t(- of Ct ti, Re/1'\m to be the free and voluntary of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �(1X Notary Public in an for the State of Washington Notary(Print) M1 c i f Ail VA My appointment expires: (1I I`1 �00 Dated: 5f i$I NCO I I J '1 3 2 TC lam' i Robert vine nvvcii iuunui TRATIMIELL CROW RESIDENTIAL Development Partner Itici fic Northwest 2001. S.W.River Drive Portland,OR 97201 (503)952-7739 DEVIOFi FAX(503)241-3462 DEVELOP. rurON MAY 3 0 2000 RECEIVED May 24, 2000 Via Federal Express Mr. J. Jay Pugh Transnatign Title Insurance Company 14450 NzE 29th Place Bellevpe, WA 98007 RE: /Order No. 867411 - Recording of Title Restrictions • Dear Mr. Pugh: As we have discussed, we need to record the enclosed original Declaration of Restrictions and Declaration of Native Growth Protection Restriction against our Tamaron Pointe apartment property that is covered per your above referenced Order. Please record these documents and send the invoice for recording charges to my attention at the address listed on my letterhead. Thank you for your assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Robert A. Hinnen Development Partner Enclosure cc: Jennifer Henning (w/copy of enclosure) • „ 9 CITY „iF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM TO: Jennifer Henning M,q �'�RFoN�i� y1� � G FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 17” 4 90 DATE: May 22, 2000 ,//&Q RE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Restrictive Covenant/NGPE I have reviewed both covenants and they both are approved as to legal form. Yence J. Wa n LJW:tmj cc: Jay Covington T10.24:03 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 C. This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: May 18,2000 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Jennifer Henning(430-7286) U 1 " SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Restrictive Covenant/NGPE Please review as to legal form the enclosed Draft Restrictive Covenant for Tamaron Pointe Apartments. The covenant is required as a condition of an approved parking modification "A restrictive covenant or other device acceptable to the City will be required to assign tandem parking spaces to the exclusive use of specific dwelling units." Draft language for recording of a Native Growth Protection Easement is also included in this packet for your review. The NGPE is required per the Hearing Examiner: The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement for the steep slope areas 40% and greater on the east portion of the site in order to protect the slopes from future disturbance." cc: File \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBPW\DI VISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\JTH\tamatty.doc\cor " - ,�, CITY �F RENTON cti �9 ..mil Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 1, 2000 Mr. Dave Maul, MA Rutledge Maul Architects, P.S. Inc. 19336 47th Ave NE Seattle,WA 98155 SUBJECT: TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS (FILE NO. LUA-98-123) Dear. Mr. Maul: I am receipt of your letter of March 1, 2000 requesting approval of a pedestrian walkway for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments project. Condition No. 6, imposed by the Hearing Examiner states: "The applicant shall provide a pedestrian connection from the north end of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. The pedestrian connection shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the proposal. " According to your letter and the attached drawing,you propose to meet Hearing Examiner Condition No. 6 by providing a new sidewalk,four feet in width along the west side of the northernmost access drive. The four-foot wide sidewalk would replace a stairway that was previously proposed to connect from the southwest corner of Building No. 15 with Lake Washington Boulevard. Staff have reviewed the proposed walkway and find it to be consistent with the requirement of the Hearing Examiner to provide pedestrian access from the north portion of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. The proposed walkway location is approved for that portion of the project located on private property. Where sidewalks are required to be constructed in the public right-of- way, adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard North,the project is required to comply with City Code standards, or to seek and obtain a modification from the street standards. More information on the street standard modification process can be obtained by contacting Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor at(425)430-7278. Should you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please feel free to contact me at(425) 430-7286. Sincerely, Jennifer oth Henning Project Manager cc: Robert Hinnen,Trammell Crow Residential Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor \\CENIRAL\S Y S2\DEPTS\PBP W\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.S ER\DE V&PLAN.ING\JTH\tmatcnd.doc\cor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ! CR Robert Hinnen TRAMMELL CROW RESIN\-1-cW Development Partner Pacific Northwest 2001 S.W.River Drive Portland,OR 97201 952-7739 DEVELOPMENT FAX)(503)2413462 ciTY OF RENTONNING APR 12 20M RECEIVED April 7, 2000 City of Renton Attn: City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way, 7th Floor Renton, WA 98055 RE: Release of Easement for Tamaron Pointe Apartments Property Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find a completed Application for Release of Easement in the City of Renton, together with a check in the amount of$100.00. The only map that we have is from the recorded City Ordinances. Per Sonja Fesser, the City will be attempting to locate better maps. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Robert A. Hinnen Development Partner Enclosures cc: Jennifer Henning (w/copy of enclosure) Sonja Fesser (w/copy of enclosure) 04/07/00 DJ:55 YAX Z14 9ZZ tf""" 1CH DALLAS COUZ/UUZ TCR PACIFIC NORTHWEST VII, INC_ CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY The undersigned, Lee Ann Shamblin, hereby certifies that: 1. I am a duly elected, qualified and acting Assistant Secretary of TCR PACIFIC NORTHWEST VII, INC., a Texas corporation (the "Corporation"), and that, as such Assistant Secretary, I am authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate in the name of and on behalf of the Corporation. 2. The Corporation is the sole general partner of TCR#544 TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Texas limited partnership, which is the sole general partner having requisite authority to act on behalf of TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Texas limited partnership ("Tamaron Pointe"). Tamaron Pointe is the owner of a 182-unit multi-family housing development located in Renton, Washington. 3. Set forth below are the names of duly elected, qualified and acting officers of the Corporation holding the offices opposite their names; NAME OFFICE Robert L. BeVan President Clifford A. Breining Vice President Clyde P. Holland, Jr. Vice President Douglas L. Daley Vice President Harlan R. Crow Vice President J. Ronald Terwilliger Vice President Michael Collins Vice President Randy J. Pace Vice President/Treasurer/Secretary Scott A. Matthews Vice President Thomas J. Patterson Vice President/Assistant Treasurer Faye Thetford Assistant Secretary Laura Hopkins Assistant Secretary Lee Ann Shamblin Assistant Secretary Peggy E. Brown Assistant Secretary Penny Taylor Assistant Secretary IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set her hand this 7th day of April, 2000. anncr\I OirrJAL Lee nn Sham lin, Assistant Secretary W:ALAS\TAMARON\CCRT_I NC APPLICATION FOR RELEASE OF EASLiviENT. IN THE CITY OF RENTON To the Honorable Mayor and Date 3131/00 Members of the City Council p City of Renton Circulated By: TAyv.ctc.r , �D►k'tc LtU :,-r1 Iau. +3L' 1055 S. Grady Way AAla..tar►a Rob 1-10,"AA Renton, WA 98055 Address: 40t0 1410 1134sl.h ». $tvd. 1.1E ► -AVV-Iuuici 3 W N 08033 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Telephone: 5- So)e--3DD We,the undersigned Ir operty owners abutting a certain portion of public easement, as c acquired from , + j, �344} dated 3i41.1. 14 1480 , and recorded under King County Recording Numbers Qo{006tiri�.0rt623 respectfully request the release of said easement. That portion of the easement area to be released being more particularly described on the attached"Exhibit A". The undersigned each consent to such proposed easement release and warrants that the granting thereof will not adversely affect his vested rights as an abutting owner. Tamr a kart R 6..t t.►h.Aed I rftw�.•p ifs .4 6r4w.i+e/ Tc.t-.*91q 1u.Nwaari Ra.t. LM,3e3 Pubtal-Q�, Si`Te(Z Pox.' Nrci4.aect , the.)�4s �E►w` signature$'' ►te'rr.es signature 'D .. Wei ( 2.65 43S-iiso print name phone print name phone 2-100 l.a.kc .446.. 3 IV I QA.Arri)IA)A 1 OS address address a2.9650 — OP.00--06 property identification number property identification number Instructions: 1. Attach complete legal description(i.e. metes and bounds,etc.) 2. a) Sign name. (Signatures of owners of 2/3 of lineal frontage must sign. Spouses do not need to sign. Owners in common must sign. Contract sellers must sign.) b) Print name and phone number. c) List Property address and King County tax parcel identification number. 3. Attach a map to the petition designating the vacation boundaries. 4. Submit$100.00 filing fee with application. SUBMIT PETITION TO THE CITY CLERK, SEVENTH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL. If and when the City Council approves the vacation at a public hearing, payment of a post- hearing processing fee of$100.00 will be required. H:\forms\esm rei.DOT1/99 • Exhibit A Legal Description See a CLc H:\forms\esm re1.DOTI/99 J _ _ - - EXHIBIT "A' - _ VAC-2-80 `� PELLY PLACE NORTH -" • Ordinance No. 3447 That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwestone ' quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. . having a width of 50 '=feet known as Pelly Place North (formerly 102nd Place S.E.) as situated within • the plat of Eldon Acres as recorded in Volume 11 of Mats pages 86A and 868 records of King County, Washington and further described as follows: ' Cuu.nencing 3i the n-ortr est corner—cif Lot r_t$ ot said plat; thence South O 16°57'45" East along the easterly right-of-way line 'f said street of 433.98 feet CV to the southwest corner of Lot 27 of said plat; jiThence North 88°37'15" West a distance of 52.68 feet to the southeast corner of -�' CD vacated S.E. 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) Ordinance No. 1824; Thence North 16°57'45" West along the westerly right-of-way line of said street a distance of 405.81 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 39; Thence North 59°59'06" East a distance of 51.33 feet to the true point of beginning. •it•ill :::";;;:•!;;;..;:?:qiity,;TX•r.,,iii!,; :tirf,.::;,:4;.i.:-.,,, i i:•-.,,,,, •....:••, ', •' ;* 1 asigropki.,) ylitliet440414,4 c Ai-kill-4..44 '.' '''. . . . ....0,..,.,t .•-•., :•-•-•!!,,y4, -•,•,•“•. A..--",,,f,4 ;•:.%; :1-,t. 1 A._ , t..±11•i'\ 1 1 ; • ' ' . sessmmmmenramatiewomommuni, saimeimims milinerisse 0141414=1.1,i,_.;vj.;i'r;liti4 . 1,141144 .10 :...0114.,•-f.' bt. 6•1i2t..;!,,, ,.i•-tri:.,,'''..'• .:;': , t:t ' ., ,". •,•1:, i '' ' • • ,, -,,,,,v,;....,i,e,,,,.. . • , • . .. . . • •. .. - iichlwftigibekir.....kioli.-, .4 ipoisiveitSW•iiti I 1064•04.ksi•arrAN•4•64:••ti.:?•••cle...,,,,,, ,,,,....:, ,,,..e.,k;:.,.„,,:;,....,i,:,,,,,;..„fili....::::,,,,*,....,......1:k.,,,,,,,,...,,,, ,,•...,.,a...,.., ,p,,,,,. ,:ea..,0::::."1 k'''".•.1,',•• 41'••44••••04 ' ...- '-,-, , ityVidOtSe';'•4:,, ; / . •••••.•I.,••••••••11.6 11.6660 10••••• 4.081 i b•sw C 114 .9 •rn re.••1 *IA 4 1.11 44 eV.eV a• I 00' , ••••••••••••P•••••op••••••SD 611.O• 00646 6/•••• ••• ilefli•110 ••••••........ , •e• •• ••ft•••• 6,,••• ••••••••et• • ••1 , f 6. .6 .6...•••••• ••...V.!". -....•0 •••.••• ........1D At Pim B01212076,2 /A: . , ....•....„... •.•.•0••• • •••.... •• • • i. ...'.. , • '!.... • 00••••••••••do..••••••••• •...Of •••• ••so ••• • .• ,. ....; • ••••••••••.66 0/0 a..0..66 6. 641”.••••••.4 I. ;,. , i ..; ,1!•.,......•...r.-a . ....;•..:.r...".g.. .- :... 7,... % .,-.,. • ..4 :, ‘: . .-.r.--!.:.•...x..-1::-,-:.r:',...;:-.:r.r.:........4. , o/ .. ' .:..• t ':: ..;::•..• : ., ‘ ,' ' . ::'..F.,..r.....%ili'.11.11F.-.7.1:::.:F..;:hit'":7:'ill.- . •• i .. , .. a•••••,•••••••111 lo••••• .0 111,1 Ws• • •• 6.1// • "''..* . ' '•' ''..• ! ..1 6• ",....;:r4'....714 : 4/ , n '''.7:'1:04--• • 'i..!.... at ••••••I• •••••••••••••••••••••1•••• ••••.• • • . , • , ,• ••••••at••• •••••••••••• a.,••••••..•••••• ••l• I.,`,';• , , .,..• , , ••••••A •••••••••••••••••••• •••• •••%A •••• _Alomoda' .A.. ••••••."I ;' ...."."."7"141.•• ••.•?".'• .1F."'.7.4 3+Ea...I:i.e....471.'74'1 0 LIL • ••••--•-••••••/ - ' 0:111•.••••4• 6.4.0 a.0 0••••OM i•swel••:. • • 6. .A••.1.. . •• w...•040*. ••••swot*•....deo el••••.4. ,, , are• ••O. •0.4E14•fa••••••••••••••••••0•A ' i •••.•••• •••••••••••ONO 0,M.II ......... ...,._ . I•••• •0„ •••••••.••a•OM VI••• ••••••• ••• , ' .) 4.•,,..,tr•s""••••:•.'7•No•"•"••?•••=•711%t:Ik:0 •IV • . . ' i' . •••••IS••••••• Dm•••••••s•-v.•••••••••• .• " ...'. •• & • ••••••...„.•••• •••••••.0..1•••••••••••.•• r 4 / r. / . X#, .,. ::. •,, ....•..O.• 161.••I I•6•.....,jl. •460 SO •••,V. , I., ••••Z ••• ••‘*'"....7•7:••..m.. ‘ • 1`.... L.J1" : .;; 6..! .1 . rt,...44..,•:.• *!;,;. :••..:;,..,:........':•:•':-.r..,.......,-....:,-,-.:::.:.... ,.....,.,,„,g, .,:i• ,..." -4 k_ '‘C4 I) - 4-:-•7 c , - ' sta..: :0:,,....,.- - I- ?'• ..,:-; :•-:.... •::::,,.:.1..-,,.:: „%••••.-. •!.....• - . , -- l• . , i i •A t••••. ....t.••..••a ....., •..•• ••••.' •i j•••••i 0 i Of pc;•••• • .."•••,. #7.171:11141:•:•••••:;14. , I-N W .)_91,.. ‘ - ,• . ! ' ..',P.a.! .1 •.. ,.,• ..;'.,r,%.r„,"71'.;...:.i"..!...".:..7;.4.F;••;71..::.•.....1••r:...Z.:•••es:i..t: . . -k- 1-7,7, ‹. • :.',,' 1 , , , ; .n; ! it•,,11 a••..••t••••.... " _ • .......•.• ......s •••\, ..,;( t.• ,i •k\:, .. ;1;10, ,.. 1 ,,..,i,...1 ;..,.,,..,:, . ,, _,„,,d, , . 7 I 7:,... ,t, s, . .-y,..... --...e. • • .‘f .7 . 1,. '` :7. : .. ......0t.•;,•e•14 •••• . it . .-. ' 1 i C ,1,••••••••••4••••••••:.,•.••••• „'. ' . : '1.1a5P1 el .•••••' fe.,.....-• r•.-.•-- • . ......-- ': '•,„.:\ %4------- --.. • ' ! .:. .....04,(114!••,a°''. j•zet••• •1;.''. 2i. . ‘.1;2) .., i •••,,,..........-..........,.•-•••••'''.. ' ' :. 1104*.- _.......$`•••:"....... : & , if .-% , 't ty . •••. . . ' '''' (01:1,2;•••••••2 • II .t1 '"'"-a7 .. lh d: ,1.(4:.,Cko ,,,,...„ ?;, (.1 -' • -,•r..64•/1.zo° : ' ' :-• , •---"..----- ,1 I 1,:' •-. , 0 re i:•:••=-' 4 -: : •''....''' H'. .e. ri4'.I:1 ei td•901/1..... 0 . . •••• . sia,•ow*,•••••.. ••••• j/4, .••••• ' V 'I , i 'I. ••• '..,... ' :• t ., opr '' ..••••°". ••• . • ,. it I :. ' 411 eV',aa 4 ao• .,. . „,.... t.0 . •r. la w ""•• '.... ' 4 jj (22; • it e • • ' ... p%•""*.r...7.00,....;°...."1.1. ,tg.,z ...pc- ,......... „ n,,,,.4•14 , //17/1•••• II, IV ii ' • • . i ./ ,: ••,•7,•.: i 'i :.,": • • .pi P 1 s * t . a I a...1 r • .), .. ••, r 4,c ,,,Ita,1,...r 44.1 tat t - 8 , ,t..., ‘. .• , 40 9..et• k ___ , ../.• • 1,t0.11,S t 11...1 it ir.w.t• :: „:_ ......_ f . • _ ..Xi' s* r c L. ....:...._•..:1 ._ .• .. . : •• - _... *I .: ‘. ! . ...rel.,'Ar' , ..• IP! . 4.,• . i ' Jr,II •- . e ... .11 , . • I '7 ,•,.. 1, ,f*-------1 I 1• •144 ;I I ftlft ....al. • r r . . 1..; •. :•Mo./ . I, 6 :r.t#11' / N, •••,40 ir ' .',I, I‘V; I. D ri.p.,.N...,....m 'I'e•,:l: / L li '. 4 i•*n. . • . il• 3'= .2. : :.... . . . A. p • , ,,., •?1 ...:i A / 14 ,• A • so 0 s 01•••001,Iit•C ittp• 4( . IL /I. 1 i ••:ni I 4' !,.. ; (..») ..,•;,• , • . Po. 1.,,".*; j , 0- 1•...*,4,,, ••; -..• 'It . 1 ••I '? L,..,„,IV km el"1, !......•s/ (.. •• m 1 1•. taits.s.rpiti S-041 4"01 fi •• } :',,..•!. ,., . • : :. ' ! 3 1.900.1 b-I.C:e.r.esys If. ZZ; et. tt r,: ': • ; •h II ....:•1..-:,',rt.ct•-••••of i i • : , , • Isoi .••....t.••3,4. - .1... .4 '. J..I've e I f.•:•••t•••. •••••:•,.a•:•••!, Otp.r ......... . 4 19......"...."'"'' 1,4.,• Apr A ,• 2 11; .• • ' •• I •De...•Op PS.. 1.0 • • •../,•••.• •01 r:...d • '.. •• : : : . !‘,..;"*.f74.,re :: r.t.PI i,i;a.,,a• 4' ,/,.0 • I .. A,'::). el.,f .74.1'....z.:pj•.•... '• * ..• !,,!'...:•••••11••••••i/ ,•I ,,'gr..y. u:res 1/.4- 4.-r I"-r:•,/•Al.:1•.1r:,.. /;.•.•.•.• " ',O. ., •:,Z Es • • •d •01•••••••••••••••••••••••••••ow A•••4,!..,4, th,'4 ..1. ••••••••• • I•.,,,19,9•1 Wit PI W. 44 I •41,0 :de,•••....T.""r 1/1 77.7NaN3-etiArA'N •a:V::.,ni: •• • 8. -.,•• .. • • le. ••• •Pt •.• up t• • 0.; • (1.se..•••••...oar•one sm.be o••••••. f .*I ‘• IAA.'o•-•,, •..•I• • •••• I • OP .• •• ••••• 0 &wan•• rms..* ••• ..•.•••••••• vie, ...., 1 ... • .. 11..rel.. .Ft.t•••••' ,,,,...t.:1,..es. . - ••••••••••••11.•••••••0 •••'••••• I•••••III.., m-" •••••••• . . i ' •• .i' oe "'"'""T,9"1"."•7471,71T„...t.'!”."...,•:„.....;,;'!"*"7"T„ ,. ., ,:. .,. ,_.- •••.'T7‘7,,,r7-'-""7",'''''.../'• ',it •.',',a ..:4 .. ••!, .f•• : +A c '•:*.''''a..V.;i:.''1".,',-7;;A'f',, ,,'''''.0 AP it1h 7% 17", 'rr77.77777.!"7"72.,,, .. % • %....••1,,, 1.7. ' • ; • •,••••,,; ,,.b 1/44:,••714.-73 ...1 0,%"...:1 1 '•-•4•••.7-t•tf41:;•:!fir',.V.'i.',•7,fli,••:"%lifte,‘It.0,1.r:r!:,:71.11bil''.:7.'" ..--f,',"•':r"••• ' " '.1.• ;-',.:41,4:',,:.''. • '"i,,."'..' '...:!....-%'...",r 41':f,,,:.•;',1'1'......,,•!•4{1.,t1,7-:',410.:714,";:rot',:o....'"3:••....24 '","-''. ' ''• ' • . 4 1 lalli '' IIMIII1.1111.1111101111011111111 , . . • . : :4 . •i,,,, ;',..,. :,--, ,4,!,,:,,:t„:1,,,,:.,!,,•• ; :., •;,; , , , ;; , ,,; , 41:1:111.*;):3,,tAqiNittAioci.;.. • er -, ,..., .,...,t;;":i•.*,'r'774': r=1,7 71.11 i3t.:.4171°, .`!%:71,7- 1-1 '71144=7;11.1.111.."MrP" . 1, ' ri=„.,, 5E :`,..•••,'",14_ •!..4. 4",.1. '74') . . - . .., . .. . , •, ! ' _,. , ::'',''!, ; '..:01` •3,1rfr,vb,.;:z.-vt.,,:11-yr.i.lq:tlyr.l'z'''4 ±"V"' ,,,,,•4 or/ Oa*Ir.a.•el S4a/0•14.1/01•a' -01•id., ji, . b.:. •s''..! i • 4.... ir: 't,....2',,L,. .•,,,,•%,.."..:,....,:%•••••=2.i0, tic/' 1,j:!••• ••''' , i•,0•;••,.ig 011`,1•••••••/,'•••1 .4109 i:.„, TA.131 si• Hi tts Ibil..egz,i'so 4 s 11•:. .1 •••••a••a.a."a.o.•aa,aaa•••!'a a•«a ,';,:;, ,,,r, y.f 1,,..741,,1 1 I,';::;::,;:.!!!'.1".:4,011V 14717%.,It-'7•;;T4' ' i•' )."0. " kr 411 Ida IWO• , ' ' ', ;:-, ,•r•• •0.644 am.•••••••••••••••••••••••••:". • i:).:' 4.,NV' 1./11 0 P.;AN , ;, : ; ;?, '" ' '.,;:.4:i I It,::;',;;•,'';;'',"1 ;,_1;,",)'t;‘,Oli.; $7...•• , + '•''''''. ' : -'.; ; ;• .‘,. '3:Orli.t.i,cit0;'%-•': ..,,.*;;;44. l'';;;it; , : ..• ; ; •••'641..0.49;;',' ;., ,: i,,.; • . ,•• 7:...••••6:h.•/4"?,;'") Si/ ./ii:r.1.14Cr? ; ;•• ' r!td•;''I.;7' Y•1''':'l fl,..:?;!!',7;: tffli tilf, '"-'0' *4:;!:tv* , f!e'OA::t,',:r•e! 0.00.C:er;•V °:0 ••-•Z '. ........,...., *°.'....;''''sP*!'.?!..1.1...'. ?If/'°:?.f.;.,°r.,,J 0.;.? ,.14414 ;41c,*?'•t''i'i* -. :;' ..14* *.'H•IN 11 ree441fitl 04,1,4-..•;:7..11,44.1.yi , j eV id filr 1 Veatri./ ‘ • . • ••;...., • ' I . 1;1,-; ..,.:. •,,i, ;"1,... ,i, „Ii,A , , ,0.•;. - I.0 IV •Jr') ........../"'! ....,..--• a .,1.1'0.:01i.:,,4f, 4-11h,::i,-Y-.±..i'v, 4. ,-.,..1;;jd a b..;... .1 . . .., _ . :.1.-:.-1 l•if!::11... ','',Ipe,i.st.q**..4 lAig....:" • 4 ', t. . . , • 1..,• ','.',7;."„-'1.,,,- , • ...qii,iftv, ..,,I . , ft: tiii ' :''Itifr;''.tt:41' 1..: ov1;i.Ift di. •-A .....,i. . . k 5 .... i'. • 4, . ; frb'Cru*/is,11°7'ill ,k 1 I'' ts I,:i•3.1,e 0, ;. . ' ,...r.r.„.r, a...4- 1...' ..::'I .•, i, • .: - •, !' , .:,,:,. ,'•• ',. 4 .,:..i:•-.,•,117.;k,;,;r‘.:,.,.-:.i.(.,.;P;41t1k.•,.4'.4,.;:;'....4:.:,.y"i'...'•/rj11,:,-..i',0F,24,.,T1...••,,,4c.k:i!,t.a,. .SFs.ra.q,„e'.4,1„,*,*,,.,,,1ii,.k„,rf5t.. .;;.f• OeA,,•,,.,,t?:.1:.,,,/,,,. ! A.1..., . , . ,.. „. . : :,i 4,. , , ; ,'t• ,. / 1 ' : .0 1,,'. • • . ;• . •!;.„..!i,... : ,„.:4.,ajw.i:7!!.3441-041.140,'... r .' -r / ,e • . ,'.••••.•;, . . '• • _, . , •••,. :I / 1(3 i4.• ' , , = v ,r to:' -10iflittVISA0 , 0, . • •i ti i't.. , .., „ .si sta.•• Ai 1 .1:111? 17 4 .. ‘ ' • .' ';,,:. '. ':'..•..,!. 1 i'. ;if',' ',,,'cps.to, :,,„ , iv.; :fgcs%=; , .',,v,..:.,.,g,,;;....-- ,, a I,,,•1 ,,t, .t.;,,,,,,i:o. f!,,110.44 ' , ofrai , ...............41,4• • .1 -•- • 0 I 04,•,,. p ; Y ' ..:• .?•:;,F,!...,1",1 7,, !;r..„',...,',;•.,,e,.7t!',...:.%t!",!4 ':•'ff.1•S '.'' . , •••.......,,41 • ,. ,, 1,1 •, ' ''',,agef" ' ' ' ' ' :', ..r.'ii.1;gisiii,,;,),Aiiiii,'.: Ati,".4 Zii',1 i .'• - ---.........it,4-...-...........,,i4. 4 i ., . . ( 1 .., r.,r,s7,. ... 4, ; ":,.,'..,."4"',. ,1....' : '.. _.._ ___,,,7,:7:r...7 .... ....,, .. ., ......,1 1„,:f‘tils:.047 b. it; • a t ''.?!'.1:•A v • •. •.'. • 6 • :,I ,.,•,;.7 •• !:4 4,•. , i Ist , 4 • •. I, ,t.. .. , • 'A/Ii// '..7.7,,,u ;,i lc.,':'l':1,,',,st.?p-,?... " ' %fi':.-'.;' ,I '.' ', '':• ', I. „;„ . 6141r... . ,..;:...., .... : ., 4..,...„, .1a.' • ., ; ; ;; fl,,,,:,":,::;',-,'•1!..,.;',,,,f :,*•''\.1,4,1 F.::•*; t:titt ts' ;• ; .',:;..'t.'''''. ;40,13;4. -;*‘, ;Iki ;•,0.7 4•180149 Le ii-Ai,4-4. . ritg 1 11.;4--A,...,,, gi,,:,.• ,..„ :. ,1:- El . ''''''t: ''' . - " q ' !e. ,;• • • ..,, .i, ilt,..!, .,-." ,:' 11. .,.&4.'741'.....41'• !.,. . ; , .... e•0;1 .. w . . ' „ . .,-, :,:,Y,: . : .....,., •$ * ..k.f*u.,-,tf.',-trti;'..t...,s;rtiv,.v. ' . ' ‘ ..071/1401 P.4P as 0°.. ...".y.t• ;11t1 . ' ' '-'''. ,fr ' '., '' ,I'% ''.'..kr''s' , ,4 ' ; ,*44i;e*".'i;i14' I'1,..,'..il *it ' cpw:,......... •,,'.,, '..,,gm, ',..', Ai:. .. ' • "".::: ! ;rz. .. i.,v1 .' . , .7 . .. ....1", 11,04•0'."44,1 , ai.;',`,!!,,i'W,‘.- ';•:. ..i'l'..14-: '• , . • •.: *, lb. i'. : .4/'1'',, ;.1!:' ',9411411g? i': ,4,1.i.,'''X'.:44". %• ''; .; 'ii, ' e; : ; • • ,...1 •, , • ; , • „...--141-, .04.9yeleilial• }6,1 , As, ,, ; . ; ,,,,, ,,. ;II, ;'. • ...a ,--- . „:.-----' ti . ' • ..-, ''-'1':;:,,!1":;,.:•••:c" irit.kli. ".04, -:. ) '3.1 .i.4' 4',,i,*1 et: ..... fP,-; t 1,1Q •---- '.* :.. • • •• ..-----,-,Y:... '.--it.-Aig04,14'..-...f.,qe:.0',1,41,,c..,0.',..r. • • .„ Li :AiT(#."Ift!: ! .A..;!.lit ..-•• ..; ' '1'11- "1'4 4. % '4*0 .**trat 1 0, . - ,'..,,;t,i r 1(.:.p. .,.,,:0,;.;;;' '11.!'''' ' i fr'ki'it .-',b , ,•, tP T 1,'• , ,'C ' ''' ! ' ' ' ' " • •..' ' 4,$;'''r .. ,,i•. ' •,.l' 1 VI ea Ir'vl '2rP , 11J `A. '-'' f•Aed 4 .. ; 4,44• .',..'d;•'.: 4;v..••PX'.".-1•'•'!i 1!::"t" T •, ; ., .N-r. , 'qt,i';*4 'Ot * '%_,. 1.•,., :41. ' . ' -i:.......,.,../q.,.:.',4-:':114.171:it'4..",':a.•Pr,-::::4':...,,ii i .. A,: 1:;4. 1 4•;.,•'• ,lk'P'.4.,%; •)C1'" ... '‘,,.% : •. ,„fr/41 pi or Nvoi:i r ', .• '411'''..r.:i!,11:•K.rill.*74•*.ar,,...t:•'',M1•41. . ,4/,,..i at ',JP&,s;It. .; '*':'-'tr;'' /r."•/ •••• ...:. , '. ' * - r . '.•••••••.4.•vs./.,‘,...,AIL 4 P....,MI•••••.•••• aorlit .. ,,.. .,•-••••••• -4.,3E-4- 'd.'")'- /(721 .c..- ,.../ .77r.7.,r • , it, ,.. \''., ' '' '.$Ps*%','".',11"e'o'''''",'''' . .'r."• d't.".';''..:'.:?...LIt'''.?!':,1"'F.,-.."''• 't. ,, , ' •ff•iii i-- ?f' !.',:;..'',c,l,`Ii'ikle',.. ' ""''t''''.: -,......."4-... ••••1•.::',.":::::::4414i ,11 ,-e .. :#.47),4if - -1(71 -) . \ ,.0 '-,•.,'"!ii'l'ifi•-•'.`;'!'ial-vs;'' 'i,,!:,!'' ::.7L It'd- t•tr;•Itt.4....-:' 4:•••••,•••••• y•,,, ,, . ... . • *..,I.se•,,,, r.1„ I , i I Fp ••1 „..I' • .. ' ' •..40 6 so i•si•••••..•ID 4•11::•••••"Z.a,....o....••to,. '' ,e‘,.,,,..":•,,?,..,..,,,,N f :: Z...._, , V . ,,,, . , •'..4:71:41:::::"*.:r...ra.r..3 tera,4.''•...-rii ,,,i, .1,-0,,yr,•-.;;), 41,,,,'' •,;',it,,.• •,...; ,4 • ,..; •., ,,;.8,,,,4 l' / •i..-!. ., ; . ' ', *'.....,se.,sow....iv'. --....• ,,,-.;=,.,.. :. , t 114.1,;, 1.1 , ... j,i, ,,,!,. ; .. ' - :' .1ra.11•••47•:::eirrow".74".74:.Prt**.::".•••i.:41, ''• 1/411,144/.. .•.:-.A.11:"."."VvIt."...•..•tr..•••0..4 OM,.q ,, ,, ,,,, Ti. ,. ,,,::. ip v ,,,....... A. /4, ./I 4'• ,:.-.'.. .,'' : ' ' ' ".1:et.Vrile.:147.142 g'.:11:Ariir•aitil• •.• .t 7i =il,r• 7.:. '", 4 ..4' 71,••'• . : ..•'1, ' '''': r s/01 .f.': ' '' :::11:r.i...;.;-•rell.:..?••Iiiriii.: :...:7:11.:: ' . ! ' ' ,1, ;(,s; • ; . .,, .,.....Ar..1..r.?.....1.::21...r.ra.......rr.-:-...F..1, •a -.. . i . • , .1,:, .4,.,. , , , • ,, .t: ..,,,!,,,,t, ,,if..:-..„ii,,..,. ,. , T -.....-.11.1.-.11.-:::,-.:i..?:ern..:--.1ire..,:-.34). 4, A..4 ,. • 4 • .• . '."l'I''7 F9LOZI ?, 109 ' ..kx. C- ' . . . . „ . : ,......,,,:,„...7.1 ,..: ..1.- ,-,....:,:..„.....r,..:714.,It...,....„1,.. .31,,z1 c':,+1 t,I..1. ,"' .ti:r: i •i.• ,;,,, , ' . 1, ; , ; ; ;1,',.4 "4,•;;;I,-.4",1 ' 4 k , ,i .r.11.1 ' , i,.. ,% ,., r..........41.0.,1•ftrwor :. 7. i• . .,..,.' r, ,. 7,1 i„4.• ,r.i •.,1 or weft ,P.05f II,/1.•l'I g fit.,.01.40 . , . ,, 1 ‘ '''!"; '•:' 4 ., , . . rm. ,g,,,,,f,,a„,0.,,,,,•.; ,,,,,4, ,.. , ' * y,,..? ' 'pi 13 Ke;i:;01alcitirblillgitaiDAtarat,g4i'44._.t4Vtlit kte::••itIA..VIS;%D.t.',, 1 t.,1,;!:(„:443i,V,i,lKi'..tA ,,F1?,:..11 V-•,„"•.k•%,:.;,,:1,:,r;":7;,,,:: it.::,....,v':.:,''! i•-• ;''..,", :;,...",..14:ft ;:;.i*i* ' 4644"lik"5:4144'1 a 1 4143" AI ' . ":'''.11 1 ;In tirowrm7r,3117 ,11'3'.'"P'. .(114'..7.7 'PrIVI. im?..:: ...'''......;,: ..''',i •I''',.‘,1..").q-',., -.';' iwilt.:,...'•.:'',* " ''w'r.*•-.."-...-.••• ' "..-.- . : . .. .:,,-!.,;•.,b.,:$0. ,,.,.,:.:'...:.,.. .,.,,,.„.,,...,;.... ..i.,,,,,,......_. -; 1,..... a..3,;......., . ,....,,..,„,.....„,,-,.,4 7,,,,,i.,'A:0,: dA,l'o.ft,;k4...4P,As-,". ,•••••-,.el .,4 i •0.1 , •immommlm••••••wimism.------... .._•••,,,,•••,,,,..,•0,,,..6,-...vp•.. iitittia ,_, Lwk,;..."..*,,,ilv, . ..-.-ir '''40-Z.4-4;,1:thw":"-A.t... .ri'.146. 1...'• ....--,.. ,,, , ---, .1 .....*1,,,eitr,.._ -. - ,,,,...i.,41k,,, ,t, - „••••.".. le,..'2/40:..5C...... Aiert If - "...„. • • gook ALA.:-.4..s.14. 4i6,1....e=assars •,..- .!•••44 et••...b.•••••00'AI'.OD SW. ••• ••••••••.0 W•••• ••••• --- •1.6 .• ••VI.•••• ••••.L.0 ...••••••.•..• ..., ... • _ . -•••• ••••••••••••• ...-i•••••••.•• 5454 •gif••. • • ..•••••••••••I.•w.•••••-• •• A••••• •••• .••• •-••••••• • • • k •••••••••••••••• ••••••OP ....••••••0. •a•• •••••••••... a... ,‘: % ••.••••••••/••..r•t •••••-•t•it••••• 11,a••••g •••••••••••••• . .,. - •••••IP.0 IIVI r•••••,fter IC••••li•O. •••••••r V 0•• r..• 4 .. - -- --- ?:- v _ ••••••••••••••••••• 01,•••••. .11•V.••••I,•••••0•••••••••• 4. • , ' --. ••••••••• 0••• ..••. .b..U. ••...,.. ,.......,,......r. 4 , , ......... .. . .•••so•••• •••••a•-lea •••••.•-. • • .•••• P....•••• •V* r••••a ,•.••••••••••• g•go •„g •10. no• v ..4...,. ' .:: - ,. r;‘...•••••••••...... ..... .. ••••_.• v::.4.,.. an.•••....,:..:•:,••• ••••..,...., ...,..1 .- "L- - - ' ""1.40,••• i ••••••••••a•••••••.44•• ••••1,..•a•..•• #•## . *. 4. ' •41111•••41• II•-•01••••Pt'WI le••••••1-••6.114 ••••, •• • •-• 4.•-' •••••••••••• ••••••••••••. a.. •••••••••••••••.•"•• , .0. . •• ••*••• ..••••••••• ••••••fl•••lb../ ••1 • •••••••• ••...• , •IP -. • •••••••••••••41.0%4..1••••••• .0 ••••••••dIP •••../0••••••• •.... , _..1••••••••••••••11•••••••4101 Il.40•11 444•41•tv a III •••••• St ACA4.C‘•11ez7 ' :::7%.... -4 z.•-.1.`""`""'"'L'........ irr•,•:..-1.:•:“,....,:a..S• r• hp..4. • ••• •.....-..•••,,,e.g.. ••• •0,11...C1•••-••••••••3•g•.11.•... • ION%CO-a g•• • ••••WI OD.-•• •••••••••••5•••••••••••• ••••..• • • •, ••••• ''•• •a••••••••L.*Pt••• ••sir•••••••,•••• •J••• r ? :: ,,. , .. ire*4.4 •••••••••••••v.. •••••• WM!.lire, •0....4 I r . •0•• - 0••••••••••9•••••••ow••••,••• •{,,,.•••.1Ic•• 14 • .• •-••• r ' •••`••••••••••••••• 1••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • -...4-...'' . we •. •••••••••• •....•*V••••._.t.•••..., Fr•• ••••• •• •e It . • ' •;,,,,,•.• ••• • ••••••• •• s• : a g ak•---;1111 IP a.....al ••• •• •• . , 2..••• g 15•• ••10 * 0 1, •• ••..•••* ' ••••••10 •Nr•q ,.. • g-... •Ii.-" -- '1....*••.••j...•..'.": '' * , •.•'.•••A..•••-••_•• :.••'•:f-•*•--•.••••••••0.i...-.Cf••.••••..'••'.•••-.•••••••"yir 11I.•.•-I-0 e•,4 t•.••.•••1:.•.•-4 ••,••-.•..•.•••'••i:i•:••••••••.••.•-...,•*•1,, ,,•4 1.4:,:;...1::1.•e•l.e•'.1•.m...•-:•.,-J--.e.I,scd.. . -I„a•" ,..4.0 ,: # = ‘+ . -... r .. - . . .:;, ... ..:.7 . , 1.-:. ' 4- O •e ••. •• .. • ••.c .., • ., . I - _ ••••• .•• •.•. ••„•••• •••• WIT..).4.•,..1".•t.4 •t1..••••• • .. • ••• ••••'a f •4.1 0•••...or . ••r •..11 ‘ Mk ZI A• < J ,1 •G. : .t••rl 1.Y°.. •• :t.--..9.:-1 - C /I *1 • t 1.1..fi ,•••'''''' . .• .re ••• l . ... •• • • ht 1.0.4-'..- r _..------ • . P ?•...• , •. A .1/.11.•'''''' ''''''....-' A IC 1 N \ fi • 'S..- •••••• ••••.•••••.-'......'"............ ''. t a,------ . • •••,I.,/ / •• ard.:.i.:-.A°of"‘., .......................„...." et . '••!. I:44• 1.•:A.:' •• jai 1) ' I."; ii . 0,i •r• 3/4. ../7•1•• t Parift of Gs,.t t 6 JZ =1J;1.,44 • // 77 ir-rs 41"3..T1 re..• t • Itir •1* ,..ics, .". et 08.4'CO!1 ...... 4• ''• • - 4... , ... . fi e :I^I e...-.•--. ... __. - - -- - -. _ _ __ __ _ 4. --- - ..... •• i‘ * ..... • . 1.1e)...T,IS-Z .17..15 JP .'• › : a • -.....-........,_--- .. • ins..... n s t V/ • 41'J4 es.., 4 -I : - , • • 0 *i t', •••• .... •.*•!•./ 1 a .*".1".............."."171.7.1 4 i 71. 1 I\V; 1'v. .•• ..4 i ...I •It ''' I/ . .11, I ••V , :I.• 'j-Aro r...•,. ../0-rs,••-• f..r •-•I 01 ...• i . , ., •••••• :.. .1 -L. ,• _\ 1 I .43- II•r7.0-f.'e ' 1 4..•;"•`. " I I • , -:-:-1• . .e,. • . •J• .., •,. /•'.. 1.41^".1.% 1..,--1 C.::0'.:"-•rs Ps W. -rt. (: "-.% s. se • 1..-:* I..-., . .... ••,•:.•-:.- 0'.• ' 9., • i a I-*••••••-••• f• . :, 111 .f• -1"t..i... .. .... r•••• •• ..„....}...40 ...2.lb 4 c, ...• :3 •. ,a f••••.,,f• •'..../'!r •.. . it.:•r------ ..,,...--1--, , -- - .-- - - -- - - -- - ---- ---- ------ -- -- 0--:-e•___.. - ,_...._ 1 :.o.:3 •-` ( . 4' .' 4•••••.,-, /s,... • ••• / _••• „..r.:',:17• •„401 ". -.:•• G I'. • :: 7- I 4 _. $ ... ,- • ..f..../2rr.5 /, . / --, "." - •-r.- ..""-.‘,":1 ..0. .'..; f .1•, ...ow Iomm......... / . ••• f•.• ALA.* SAWA An {IS- 3TI .• Q.. , 4.4 NV 4'4.1 41.• ••• 410 O. • • I r.... •.,,..••.•• •••••.••• . se,. ••••••• •••••gr..••• I 1 _.-t .. TOWNrie."--ti:;•1:!•43.77 I •• •••• 0 ...•••• •• •••••••••••-• •••• •Se • 0 •••••. .•••• Z. ..-•••,-- i 07 0.• ••/••• ••../.•••••• •-• "4-.• ••• r- ..... -........... .• 00• •••••• 1 I ga.._. ....gm•••••••...mmHg.,OMNI••••••••••..•• •••••••••••••••••••••••••=••=•••••••••••••• --......-----• T_._,.*.,.**_-- *> r-•-. • ••••••... _ , ..-,•••••.,.........,-...-,. . .-_ o. .op:'!i.. .LJ.-+� •' j• �/ ; ._P., .•..• Y• m• ... .. .S..n_. • ••• I / ..w •• • +w. / • f --siri.i-::K--+K .. r � . J .....,... a1 w_ ••... • L..•.••. ...••.+. •• • . ♦ r •� •.. .► 1••r 1 • Li 111•0! F{ 1 �• • •a ��'�• ••../ •r �*It• - ' ;ar;; • • 1 \_ , I •.'•i+G f vow- .Poloj f Z rtI ) irL.• 7 • �'• -.4,? : +' J.t•dar II a - itiec/ . 7.s!tt.C.7ti • _ I'. 1 -..- 7 l071•, 11; w7 pT:/. - Jl.:�1t// my:r!• ) • t , `r if 7i,7 1 r:'-2fo ccil i ,ris•�, s'pi t '' �- J . � . • rye,, • • Yam- ' T ..•cal: 'r ;•/ -! pAtg > Y j::.•_� : ` tt ail T sa c. x "� r7 F. ••of r l••J •-N•7 WO •••.•• •. c N • i ti • s- t-:` / •-..,� .oJ.,l.. If:. •.1••••.••1...t♦h•. as .. .A•... a•....Al f r • •��r_. r1 f l N1r f. �• •.• a•.,•Oft* t.•'a r -•.•►•i .•.•�..•v•a ..a.•i � k �e °F *!�� • • •s. . '1••f.••'••.M-..1.•t..ate• J'r w .}Z� it., E 1 -0* 1a ,+ / } •r h'p 1sf �., r .i.. '�r.�/,•N 7 aY •a.• e w a»i.a • «•rs.t x� �.a .ry.Gatti atiSJi' .▪ Ti T . • y rr.... . t•.r••+s.r. w5•r t•+•-a» ..y4 Cr:'.'. r�.»•4 �. t� g'.:•-••i.� .i.. •I..•• •1•••••.•. I. .....•q. -..a; i♦ ♦ ., . .. -, aw •.w 1.•.-•.i••• a.•r.. . is• I Maas•Iat•I....1i X 'f•'n • f.__- .. r•.. . -i••• •..a t.r.'•• .•...r.••�at7f••° 4 a z . .tom i ..••• •..a••�i.• •.a ai.•w•► •-•r•►10-a.... •.=M%.T'{Y h 'r s s 5 • -.,., a' • ••..ir••••••Z4'a•al M.A.,••a re.• fW• •Sr.- y .p�' ▪ .. y ti - .-w .•a••.•. t•.I•:•���•••••w•►eti Yis.a I'1 i Y5it � :C.[ Y E< - .a• iwIAlit�.es 44,• ••s e.•i.•.0 S.i Me w.4. j- ♦ • �+ - . .�',• . 4,r r�'•♦r a a.•a. r1Pw. •�Iwa a..•�•.•r•aana,i.�.i'N.•• '•--,I,.. t�t. 1 f�.��4,-- 1 t. y:ash ! :+�CL� -'&1 _ •▪ • •.., ia•..a•.�r air- V R•PYR• .r r..•.a•� s S-.t"."'.a _. ., `•g1zlY ' i , `1 ,•. - ••-•S..r.* Ia. _- •.•.w�•&I a~hMN.t •�` r "rnl� ,- �.'. Tc< #' -- •af•.tn• Y• ,a.. 4 _C-. '•! -- ", •.••• sea{>.�••••M M b:......arm••.ice .c $..cf... ' r 6 IL,•.aa•.a+w•u•••••• ••.1•.r..• .•*eV.Z••••..^ "`'� 1.1, '' t'•. >a nr7.�,:=e aa...• •sb•a• • a•.'or.%aV a N•w•••..a-.r•••• •.as ES ; !vr741v...-4.4 ./,-;:li'''''47:6:1.-'. �K --.>t` • ' i..•.•••.V.•,.a s•l 7N.•••t•.1 .M:•f••1•.If.•Z • }. .. w, r �he Vr9i�'c)t v +le ✓ rc +r _.. • 1•.t.•••-•f N•1a.7.•NiHa•.:as a.e..• t'f.•a.a•yr��s`� t t �t .1..-� v, we...+• -. 4 5 {.• x �':� M1♦f.•.ofga't•.N..•q•••a...•.••N w�Y.•>M N..'TY•rs. s _.a. !--;'l•.• \. a- •2. - T 'e--x..,...•_• - L •••..•/'a a.L 1♦•O f••%omit *•t.•motet..-=a S••lee V ' r t 7 I♦�♦•�l8 7k £ .•'1•.r• .a....•#S•I ••• #a.. a.•:a.•t..... w .''� 9• s., .' b.` ;fig '1 '.�� - ...a••t... wN.•I. . .•..•.• .a. a ••••w. . tl sew -t' o'le -t..•� T F - t t.;.. 4 . tidy �* s i. tti a M•.M a •a1M .............a-•a •. 1 ..4^ '�•r:.-tl ' •}+ +fi • i ♦Y t♦1.a►:. aims.ab soma*.. a a....v."' .. r.�arm v•v"a a .M -> 7 •.;:-' y 44 . k _ . r4'-c'-x i <� c •y..M..elldi •l r via•.f•.r ay.•aam•r•l rr •'+� • . . ' ., , -.V.` 1•, , rC 4 i�t�, •t:fizC a•-••1aa•r r•a•••tire••••..w• a M•.•:aw a•.. "Cf`t • k>16F �, s. V▪ i _ •r.N•••.•.,w• ••aI •r••. .•.,••••...f•••Y.a•+•M - -.. % 5 s -! a„" " �f i 1FX .F r >' .,' r f.•►w ••�YK4• ••.••r•M ....o•Mn.!N•• E • '`t 'l . - s . - tfii.( '•{4 0* •. •-N ••.•11.r..•.+a).I .•....rN ra ya...•a.• ,.. R f ��} . .,. .7 , ;41► y. .tti_; •.•�•R• •...I -• ..YMMI-1...•.•r1••a•• f:•rf ` N++y S';S ES':. L I.. •••-• • ....M...W •.•••ss ....4 l•I N • -•t•a 'iYYY ' i y�,, ,.., .t .. ▪ • •a. a.•a N•.h•.r .•••_•.•Mee%••- /�•.a. 5a.r 1, 1 4 � f8�?.p -t'ei. +r{t F4.•.. r7 ((''rrii.�' ' • -i s `' " ter., 1-.1 r.+ t y • a • .: . {' r • 1._a�? ••�• Y :� G r_.�:t a K y. .s r r�• ,.. yam. ."00*�,#►P ' "•" r .,.,: to •. ;.b� .1•C �r ': F -• .r, 1. ..r '• r'. . , - �.$ •4Rz.:t; • =.t••- h ..Y.• 1 ;a t-� .: w1. «di Y' ... a:i: ...._�...w... - Y.:+j!n. v• r rk, i..1'7,77,-,'y4 , .'-k., '43 -.4r~ �.I•{'� LY"+i .'4.i, FY St lS'f< 4,-. N•hiR> 0 72T'�"',' :f •., - F. �5`:�:i.tifV �.1._s �r:_` t�Zb,�>Y r n-.._~y ♦, Y'y- .er.INO a. .I. �•I ., . .I : .) ••• ••.-.1 V - -- ' ., . .. . - ♦--i J•'is r,.l•`- .:,•:•.•:/ r• . iS.7.- 'Ii-, 2_cI i.r•-v .. i /%! iJla/ !'.1(!4•r - • a4 r:a/>"-1 k-� ✓ c- ' 10' I 7 I •R. is.11,,0 ,i7+:..1 <1 .____ • b� I 1. ` r — ?• i :! I �,t 41 I • • 4.1 ..) - arOP•' r 1 • _ :i c - • •• yf1 J t•,/r•x,v •�, ; - _- - 'F , . t) J , -• 'p •• - �.. • li.,L' j; r;.° - —•-a• i- •: .r ;�,..<•• 7e, e v 0 v ... e:- i !y el• T• •••,, • 10, •.... •• A. =i • MO - .- 0 . . , + ` .•• � _ �: n was, r 1 . 42t :3; "vn•,..Ar.,r n-11-7 - :. , -': I .,.. l:j, VII... 7' 17W ti D •1 v It.al . y ,-,...._. i • ...4 ,t-s,-.,..r.,,..- . _ Z9LO? 1 zI ne H2,,,. F , . NUJ irk,Da.• _r.'wsp •I '{/ ����.�yy 4 ,. J.4.,.,. ,y'..4' a,•. 7r •(df-,s. vt1,; y.w r..e+..a.-t w►'.�1,7 . ys• .,,. -.' • *y s fin' _7, ,...-:'v.:ds*—aS�..1.4 sGn ,cam;;"^• _ I . z� �: .' . y iyri .. ! .,--• ;:.- -ti. -; ' •-•:.---''•? '• '-';•-•":%.•*4-- ..-.; •• • • *.-.-."'•:. ' '',.- . = -,-* '•,• • - - - • • .- - . . • • _ ,..,3..w4.-•t4-" , ,- 1 t.....,....„.z.---.,-:-......-•-•k•-•.#7,31,q--:I,...-4,t 40- -,---'4f4t.,-"V31.111e3' I t 7.':•: , „ . ,. _ , . .r-,..-,'# ., • '}t!....kx:P....k ' '.'S.1.-„,71-".,'- :iv., 7 •- • :.''''. 7,'''',*r-''M''''.‘',.;'',4,.,)hr:c4-7"eri ; ...,. 4,4:Allri-,..4-. ''PV., 4. - .-04.44.9414ft.., ...:, 1 .- f, •.0-`, --- .2,q,. '.A ... '4E-L.,.IP-g., q-A;."11.:49"'"4"1:475'4 C4 '•••••..--.--' ,...-C"-•",f--"•0•-•••it i-..v-f, :.,-e--r-i•T-Lt.'",--F--,..-- - . 1-.- .,*;--'-'4'-....."•.„,..,...., --...,...--....:-. . '.-----'''' '''''.9`-=',.4'1.-,:-.-N--..... '-‘,.#s• Iti:4'..." '•-f•••-'-''Afi.t Cf:4411P'al.',-,-of ..:...0.4-.,-,...,, , -is,ii.#444 ''"'.-."':A'''''' - ..ir,.. --..,. ..-..„:.• -:-.-7 -1-71.7•:.. -„„....---..,:°,-•,..,.... ,,1;*_:'::;7. ,,,m7'.11,--...s-:----o,A!----.:f .. 4. - ''- r-'‘..-',44f.... ;..•.".i.,-.'''''.-- - - ...fla...-'' 441',,. , -.--n,'It Pf.b.--is:••-. P":;:,4..;-., ----iq_z---8-''..---,,--..- ";,. -.• '-•-• '''--.?.,,,,-;',441. --'---",-; ',-!.;..-....- .•,--,'.,--,:'..1.-/:'., i-....',:.•. ,. - • ir.‘„,-.,z,.,-.:. -4 't-7-'•-.:.•• :,7.•-e., -_.-41.,,r5, •Iti, --7-':;;.•,.-,-...E. . • y'''''-!,'-V-.4-47W..• 0 12 1 2076 ,'..t1.41.;... .-.', ".-.;`,,;.:•,:4.:-..,1,,',,. ..41 .,..";_•:. ,...4,. • il:k..&;%"- a-",4%.?' - 1'-*.'' '''' :•• :.-, -111....- 1 . -',tl,`-': .. '7,,,_,, ',g,-,,t,Z.,,i 4 -,:ir.„._, , 1‘,..,1„.,4_,4--._1: i,t''-- t,,;".;!'T .-.-J 't'-;'4'4 '.lat-4-'''. il,..C.'•••"•k• ;iii--.4r<--:.-.,- ,10-..--....c ---,V'..;?-P- - .-. - . C...--.- -:-.1- ;',.4;.!'At-. '1,i;i;„, I,'" -:"..et• illA-,--i.-...f•_ ,. e. _ . " ..±..::,-,,, . , ; --:'..1-1-.4..-.:2.,,,,:..........,,AW-24,,,,. -:•,0-. . kt.,..fl ..., ,,,,,...p.. 4,.i.,r„.,_ . ,.....„....,.,... ‘,.?tr.:04.• 1 I-' ...,. .. - ' f.:-..e; •...*, .,a10.7,,,,i.-, .%gip,' iv-A'1.,-:.-t.,“..1,11- .z ir-/4'41;!!,- 4.,-,--'''-'. 7• ..., f`.1-,44. •71-:.af• • ille;.7;3. _1.7;7' -....-.... •7...":',.,. 41A1 ',,;:-...t-',1 I'::. ' --1 ,,I3...--,_,:" 3' (0 ' . -...•:t:-. '.4. i I40 A!.41*-'..,...,-N.t• 4.•'Apci-r.,. -S ' -'..??-.4.irs,„343t1t10;-,),--;ii-,SA,-;„'• ' .,-.t„.--•, ,,i711-'-:•••,c;. •"..1,..tf".. 4.-75,--.. V:"r 4' -4.410-w,•-••,...,":• I' et% /--.-Z,14.":' ---•--,---;' -•. -,0,31 -• --,...----..-:3.,_,,, .4. ,,„ft - -V6774-,74, . -...,,.•-.7.z,.:, .i ...**7-:.;;.1 ,...,,,„. - 0,,,,Ust., . - .,-.4,.-..4 a' ir, ,...-,;,,c--. ....k.....,:::..,-• • -,,-,„,•/- . ..,1 7,,..,.-; "_7`,,,,4,_.... .,"- - '.4 p.,,,tle• E-!-t:‘,:i..L.,15;,,... ...,7.'"«7".,1, 4,4,--,- i,'. IIJ ...." -'i.s,=#-' h.q.,. - 'OA ittiq4'• $4,r-'---1.=. i5'.-..t.t";--.'•:` ',-..i•-';'$---r.1.-.-14zi,,,,-,tr-;:-...--A---_.:*.ii PI'.-'- -,..:, .j: -... 7.4_•.:-F.z?;-7-,-4•6*. lift-,-f:...4.71e-''''. .-,.11,4-44:. ,..„. ;,•!...,....,,„ :.,..:, ..... .,, ,: s.,-.-....t.-•._, .-.,,_. •-.-:,,,r,&„,-;,.. ,..„,,tp....R.... -,. -,.- .-g-,_ T 4......;4 -.,,,^,,,..f..- .--`1.11.71,r4:41,,,Z;N„ .5.v.4 . ...,...":}-..1.11.,.;.,_'T.,...,,, .4.; .-. ;.:-.!:-.611t , -.4'7, 4:•-•••,...p,s.4tng-i '.4er 'a,..k..74,16.,• -.1.-f54.1-',-:.---..-t-'-4- --7-..-:..r,:.-1.';`,?---,!:?,,,,,,' --4,,,,,,• k2,14.-", '--.-- ,A1-1,...';70,,,,,, 44---,-:-..1, -_: .._,..t., '' - -:ir`,),,, :',,,,,,,,,,,,..,„,.. , ,„,33 ki....0,,,,,,.-.,,,!, i„a - ,),t,i.,....--,v.z,...1.4,1.,1....:tit i- ,.1.-- ..„,-:::,y;,..., ;#7%..is,..;:fic,:, .,,,,,..&*,44.,-.44,.-,F, •., ..„0, -!, ,-V7,, ...L.;•-•'-' , 7. .1-„,,,,,t ...„,.... ..„:„. -..,--„. ts. :.,-.4 .- ,. .1!..-ail;//-:',-- ,s'i'-v .c..-1,ti.r.:7',e,.....-.7.,s7.-...T11:- -,k...4-1P3 -..,iti.,f•i!, ".0 . -‘1".•'::- .1'. kk`44.1,i'-'•'- .-:',.? '..- :i-,'Ji.-'',.--4."-.!".,4•-"...--1.''''. ',.',.1"1:t4'•7 -4Moo fiq' let-e.:.4.-+1. -:'•,..-.-7"'V:itt-- ,,,-•••.' "f'::1 :-.-• "›„,,''4. ...,,:e t''' - '%• .--•,,--"'',--w-c• -ar.-1;--:--Alt qf 4-sc.*:'k•'''i 1;14:-.,..,-, ,, .,.04,, •p.,-,;- --:,21- -- •-:,4-- . - . _ -•-, . ., "."...., .2214 ' .-.'l -••+ ' "S•94.' -.-,r.•;r*...,4.,C4.44"....,1,i. ... ...3,,efity .-. -..-t• --', '• *:"..'Re.f&_,,. .;4,e&'7!•-.,,:.e.i-,,77,..t? st9z;-4.--,k I. p ------ 4.- 4,,, ,- - ., - • --,F...-.."0.•• .-, - - ... - ,1.r --- '.tr-,4„.:. ..0"...,. 7...,7;, to. ,.......,,1).., 1'.:-,i...... ., p,.' 4 - ,•-:-.' ' ..,.:.,A,..a• .t.,1-1 4.-L*1.'''"....„,"...,..I!' 457,„..i.,..:• -4'I N-, „,,,,,F.:-..,1.4- - 4•-•p.',..1,.- .-tf. prte• .-,i.Z.---,,, ,-... . .f...4.4.,r,:,•5;:`,4k,44ti.1:;-„A.,.,..{,-41,,,,1 1: -.,i', • '..' - •• 5i.--"..V kt-'. ' -!..... t'',...-,,, :-'''iii 1,".'_ =.••• -- : • .,-.---t„, ' .-1;-.!.-,.."- .!:-4•isa- ••..-",.-T-.- 77.•:-.,..zw.,_ ,9.,•,,,...-,,,,,.....,...,,,_ ,,,--.-k.„,t1... ..4-,...-A4,-..,-.•.. , , r.1:- kb..1- '' 'd''''k.'i-e.;"'"'41 -V-,-4"-•• .1'-•.:..-"V! 7- ' '''•':. V"--'1!"4.. -, ' '--_-, ,-:44,-,'..'•3gtv •ae.444.4;z-X-milf1.1 -,Y7,:f4rift.,-,1•_'-','457%70.33-,•-•:;•.,.••••.;'2.1.i..1'4 .'-',C; - ...44 - • .r- --. -'4.r.,:F'•`"•- ..h4 It.'-- • ,-•*,•-• -_..:., ,„ _4/04:, - . : 4.&_1., ..1::i 4---A,.4.,.••t,,,, -1P, ,,,, -',,'--,,V,ji.ift;‘, ,,eY'.5,..--.,„ "-rT.,*--.'"' .4..-4e,--1:- `-:.-71da 4 = -‘-.-tl"•, --"' - -...,1,..,•1.-A - .01•,. -i,-,',.,F, : ',11','=:;-• ,--,,, :-....- . ...,..-i,,.r '..-,-4( ',74F„F._ 7::;t".,f1;0;., .,,,,.. AtAST.'5'.* ..7'..,:-..-''''''-' ' . „ ,...-..kr;1 ........0000.00.0, .. -.7 •.,, ,..,,,146.4)3,,,....-4-.)-;74.sr,C.ItY,-. . . .,,,,,,.-' 14---,7-•-i-*---f- ;5,N. -- ./0,10' •f•-,74- *4-,V .i-v*,.. ---.:1'9-.' • " ?....:}'''. '".7f:FP.i%i..,..'.-.-,-t.P.2:4` ..-..,...r..,%Z.r.2,-'-' ..•,, .7,-..,"*,,j1 i•?..".',./ -.,.....- .•_.4.-- -..11. .-..-`,4 ''' ..,...;,,..-1:,-.. ,... 1.- A, -.--,- ,-tri)L.., } 4 ,...; - .As . . - ,..-...a•(.54' ...•,,kr-, .l's;'.%" ..,i„,,..,..,. - .,.4. -;.;.;-..".... atoe.•...fr .11,4r. . •.? -,, .. ,--',743Vi - , .:77'•"-*?Ae.,,fV-.1,4e-- 'W .'- Ar i I '4 :..k"r .' r _ ...._ . _. tr ..-. 'ir c.4 ...,.4, .:a,.----....., .T...-_-',.. ...r. ',..x..;•....:2-,te.,.."..:r4:‘,..:.:,.. A 7.3)."- .. „...-'4:41..:,00.. .!_s4---1-1g74.41..4,0*Pil ,4 S.--';-V,.... 4 ....tr!-hi-1."S-::--4.'.,'''''''Z• ' .A....'*4-:',-.1.1,,---,`;e.,-„..4-24A-,.t :',.-;:;;- =-'''''. - -,c) -l--',',€or_,..:•.,..i.-,-,:::•".-Zi..,'Zi' :.,;- ...•" - -111-zr''' 7;f•,.....-tir,,i-4•4- •,,..4"...4.1'-!,,.,,-'-..'S.-"•' 1-41- 'L‘ tir-W: .i ''''i ---•-,OWK-- ' ,3fii,, -'-• •-1..'&,,,....*, ,,. :;,_it 16..'r*,_ 17;'-r-rIse.274 i-'!'‘,;•;':•111 iqt.„...'-›:*,-.. - --'n '-F- '";2 • ,.- -ri"',I4'^-§$./.. ';''.....2...-f-' .-ktik,..-le. Is '-...'..-''''- '71,1'''' t.lb‘r--- -...i.i'r.A-r'70%."'''' 44.-ep--V)v, A -1:. ., -- ‘.4,', ...-r.C-1.7-.,,,„,t.',,::.4.;`t •r ' 1 L.7 ..:-1:7r.:"- ""4.4:f:-_,,.-'.i. • • P.:P ci . .,_4_,:is.L..-...- ',-;,.1.-.,C.,.... •-,...• ,, ,i1...., ..,..-").'t-4 -...,„. ,. ii.,..- . ' 7,'.,:, :".-i' ..`,,,,i...1..-0,,,,-f-,-,Kis?, - r - 4•1"-; •',4t -15ie'4;..i.:,';.-1-..:7*--(:.- .4.'7.- ••"".•-,-10-1.;.'40-4_... `"'"- ---..- .4..s•'"-..-.•':it,;;Jii---....2.'..-v.'-'1-11•' trt -Ar-•,,L ."--,',---. ' "AL"! : 915-IC :1':--..'..4'4'-'''''''' .•, .,,,,p„...--:.V.,' :V.;:.--- \ - ; ' ''. ”ottti,g•Nt.t .ziv,1., , ....P±-:. 2: ,i,4;.-exfft.,..„..„.,...,ss-A7-1,1"..-:, ,..,..v.,,,,-.0.,,_:,:, ---,---7,A-A --r ., 2 ‘-'1'-;•it..-%'VA'....M-111'1.• -••• •••'- -,.,4 ---• . -.•1•••-"''v,-.44.4,..-'"N•-Ao.:4-Ai4Ap 4.',.....4.4---.1.•-;=4..:1,-..;•-ma-:=..,.....,,,";14 4, . . '•-. '---.'--.. .':...-r-'-'• '•----.'••1 ---.^,•.) ,,,, i. . --..,..... .....4- .... ...' -,..:7,4,..tx-. ''e;11- -..-1:17.'.--- --''':"'i"i -'..'s"'"'e't;----;':,,......„.h''.e.::-.4:.7;,, .....is''61.•.;-.„7,.''.•'''.:....-..T..„•s-Z.;N7-.-- ....T. - ... . - - . • - 4 e -. •.:,:-.,-,-;-..:•,-.4„,-..:,...... 4,1*,.„46... ,. , i._ - .; -...-4A-gi.4A_ft.-,...,.0.-.4...,,-.R,.,,...isoH.,...-.*,,,-....,....,,,,t.,4.;-,-,e-A.v.„,xtv....)7,...,;,-.••., _.• •,. .. , : . - ,: . ... .t,„.,„,. 1 ,--- ...-4,i.4 k.i.:.,,,.., .,..,1,,,--,7-!..,-.,•, t',.,,,tv,0,..t:i...-1,wz.. ....A"...-1-44,:i.*,--:.•,•":,•-;-w-4...1-7.t..teatt.:-..;-:::-.\‘_t•.i.;'.Vc?-,,-.,:'-..,-,-7:;:;:;..,...-•:,-.- __ . , . - -,--_ - .., . - -- .."..t.--4., --'•:.-J.- `;37. ....4-..,,-,zaff:i-itA,1- 4y.:,-,„) . . , . ,.-4.mw.r,---,..7-.t...,..-ri.-A%,.-,,ti.. -::;..:Kf:.:.-,7::-.[..-:."7-::.•,:, -;44.-. .---.: _.-:...:.,_:,.....:, -. .- , - ••, - ..:i.,..., -,,,,i At. ,r...,:i •.-ni-.7,,,-F--;--.‘v.'-'rE.-_,i--...,.1 ....--.-...4, • ,- 1:2A_....,:i- -',...iT•zc;.-',,,,.-1,1,4Y+:,-T..•'=',..-...•'•-•-*-1-`1.tf.,-tik".72.,:-...-•-•.•-• - -:•-•---• - - - - -. ' ' .. -- . .. ".-• '.1!.:' •'!' f••• I--':-.!.‘:•-•'`•-1-;•!..v-,%."-....7-•,;-71,.' s r . ••-•.•,..--,_.-E;,.'-'',-:7','•••:"T---`r.. ..;'4.•-'1.3..., .;7Mq',.,;'_,` -':.7.,'.-.::."?..1-,-.."7-... ..,...-.:".'.2.' •..---.1.-1_,,,-: - .. , ..- ' . -,X f, ' .e".• - '.-.3.:-;',P.:.F,:rz- ;r4 s;`_ -••.:,-,7.•----.7,-;•,'!i'- '*7‘,.5:;1•."7,-3.......;::!,:f-t.i,-74.-„7.-;,.;,.,;-,,,,,,,,.,,.:,_-1.-,•;',.',,-,- , •,.-...,.- - - -_.. -::-",'- , : .., ---.. .. .,*: . 4?V•4..4i:• '''''''- . _ . - •., •. -- -:21:4-,...,-...1 - . - ,..4'.':ilsr!- ...••'' .....i h-....7, - , '.: , - --i.. : , ,..- . ,-:,....,,i ..1.-.474-.,--:_,, .:-, -----,.•_---,-. .;;.,,,7..- --;.- .:_,.,-.:-- ,, ,-,. - - _. ,.- , : - - .,,- .-. ..,...t,.-_ .,„-,,s' = .-.., AC.*- II• - pfl- - e ,AA,,,o,Itoza„::-.::',.,-0,-,- ' -;':-"i'..:.;•74.-,-F:jx.',,-ii,..;..H: :':•:,:'.%:. . - • •,- -,-:.--7;•-• ---::--- -::•I'it.-'; p?ii ---q,..- -.-.4),,,•cr4,:-.,. .,-.4,,IP-,:-.--:,-,,,..-., -:--;,-;,.m.4-1•. :----,-.. ',-...:-.,-•:::-- : .:':Irr'' ..-.4t,,, .'' '-' 1.116.40 WY/4j....-, .....i si•4, .......,/ •- t-- •.. -'•;•••"•",,,,,,°,14:.... ..%'-'en,:•••-••:4,•„1.-A • . '1,'..-2-•..,.-:'.!.e.*44:f)-1,-;:.--',.'-'---•• .- '-' '-.1..: .- .' '...11.4(1 - '. 1'7.' ..e-'7 ,. . . • -:-. :'-'224-,1,7•7 X-P.r44.,`TY:9:-.4q1:-.9 ' - •:-.?,.i.".•-•..V.!•.,,•.,...7.-i-,'.,-.:,.•..-,..••_ . • ---.-,,,- , .•"1- , : ..r, :•,,.b" Z :..••• ••1::,..'.,A's •, "7.t...•,;P.e4f-,J4?••.W.e._e'l • • : :•-•.--,-,,,;.,2A'..;!......,_;'---: ; :' _ .,; • „..,..• . ._. . ., . -"ik. .• ' ...,,..... . -- ;4' . • r . z,..1 " et"11-""":': 3. ••,•;-"±•;;;t,1,-.1.i• c•41-il-atttilis7?--71- -..'7,,:, ..-1;_t - . ....-..: - , • . -. ..: _ , . -.• -•-- . - -., 1• zg . . .•••'" . . .,,,..,.,.,,,,,, •...- •,...,,,...--c-.,,..•-;.,.w4,-4 , ,pv,.....-,..4.-c,..--0.,:o - •.- -.-2,,-;-`4.4.1. .44.11,g-rf:.... -; '. . - - - -. • ' - -- - - '; W .,-• .--,--... --4.,;,,„ 1.. - . : •,‘,..:..i4..---i-ok. ' .v4. .ii..--,IT----i . -4' • ,..,,:‘,-....- .A.r.--‘.7-•:••-"••-• - : •„ ' • '-' 'i -•...,•-4,-.4:43....V):;•.'".•,rt•'-'•-!;-•.•'-' r -. ,i, '.•-•'-"T' ',...."2--!.• -.`---;', .. , •.: --• - - • - „ -- . . .•.- 1,1,--: - ' ,-'-•• 1,- ' jli • • '.•-:,,,•••:•:.*-:1-.'.••ii, t.-V.-1.1, 11 , -!;-:,4741*.::q4M44--,..,-.-." .:.:•:--:::.-:,--7 ::1: --_--. ..', ' - -15:, . •r.•,"•-••-2.i.•4... . ,r•,.. - .• .,.,•,:-,, -, , ,.._.‘,t,s,-,;.,,).,)..•-•...4,..,t..41,'•,-,..,.: . ,i ,,,, ...0z .: t..1- -- '.....-ii-;.-.1.:'el ,.; <• 9' ,t,'„, -, ' . . ' ' .:r..', ':: : ' ..:::'-' ..' ih ...... . .. „. . .°..f,0 .. .''''''..A t a 'a, - - -• • :-. ..----.-.7(---- - - C, 90 . ., ,,- --''•-t-' I, ' :..-.....t...rri ft - -•- -"• 4t1 1. .e -, ...4 --- - - -:. -- .-. '. -. '' . - s 1) -..- -.' :. * LA • AiXi/ ..5 C ....-- ,„„ - - . •-....7.--••- ' • it --_,• .;,..-.7--- --- ---- ---, • - - - . „,,,:a 1..,3. •-- - , :.., ...,,.,_ i ft". --.... .„,•.,•-_ •- • 41' P•Z., P _ - • •••••• •j••• .. . . '-,..- . , . , , ..I . ,4.*te ----.- • - • I-I a4,4, , .:-.• .1's..,,,ir,,• A • •.v..-.-5-,7- "" ' ..or • - : -'_=- ,--••'i"..:7--.7.;'':,.-..:-.t:'.- ---.:-• f•--;.r- -.....-...K.....,-;:',•.-, .. . .,,', „ -= : : - , . -. .,..-,. . _ 1 • - . ,A- • . . - •-ft \ '1 •Iti , Li. . ; --'.= -..-:-..".'..-. . -.. • • -- , - '9 ...s.• ,. . _. :_ _ - .-. . . ... . . . L . --, f lb. -,-. ket't".'t e'divo if i'l-*"r-14.41i; ' . -.' :'" *,-.. :•-1 . - . - ' - - -. - ---..74.34.-'!:-.- - - "raprii.auf (A' 1.-.. ,..!".. . - . •-.:' , --- - :1 - ... - . • . - • . ,. ..- - - _ . . . : - , .. - lit 17 gels /Ps ri.",,, . _ - ,_____ - -- ------ --- --- _ _ . -, - I . Ae•Y':5 '.15-e 47z-ff--.:.•:::--• • *1 • " • .,.. ...,,._... _. ,... . .. :f_ • ' - • , :, : , - - - r-..„•a' i:- .:---, •-•-_,.:::::--,,----.=.-•..---i'A-?C:-.t A „ . .. .. . . , • - '• -• .'- ' '::"7-:-. ',- ' ,'‘'-- ';':-.1 * If I C - ..1111••••••••••••....•••••••••••••••• se .. 4 1:7‘.rt.e17. ;EN;-CMA7,7A•N a .::sc., m . „ ._. _ -•r,....••..-1,• •..cw-:.1. -*IV r.S II V'...*..... .".0" 1,:: 7.4 ^1, - IIIM 111110110.1.• •• uniminftINNONOW11111111111011041VIMPOISIII11111001110111110.4Z.;0 7P'W*‘'77;:_jV.;a"W:t*:,•;;4,t4M 4I'T ''. '4°..5-:V41 :e7.'.. -•-•-• , _ • ‘vivalki,44=reittaktitStaZO.46,‘..&/- ' QINtifiegagadigtibiqUa. V dr.11 s P.iir alr . - - --- ..........-2.--.-.............. of fist/ 2.S 1.i l;CVII .., .... ..... 0 , . ., .., ., , - -. .„. sm. 4. -. .. .11.1 AMP. -•• •••". - m. a....o• ''''• : ' • 1...'. %••• gr . :ri: ,it o.I ....., iisr.• ilk. . • . ., i . •.. . .. .-. .... ..... _ _ _ . . . . .. . , . .._. .. . . .,. 1 -- „ . .. .„ • , ... , . - •-..: 2 - J'Asiss int If • rvor ,ritr• ,, . . , ... •- . ,-! ?;e7o.i:gio s•ev t -,.:,:::±,. , -a ,.. ._..,„... .:..„:„ -... •,, . . : _ _, : ..___. . . :. . _t _. .- _ . 2.....4„,,:-.4:: :,;•%,;7 v. • . 4• ..- ., ......... - , ,•. , ‘.- :- . • . •.• ..-- ;,. : 1 -•- -- ,.. ... .... , . . ._ „.. . . . . • .-_,, ... _ .._... ._ _.., , , . - • _- -.,-. • „,.:• if -....-,. 3,-,••••:,-• . ---f.;..--.`-'"' ' ' . , . ..„, . - • . "`"''- '-'''' , . . ' I- - - .•7 is s, , , . . , •., ..,_: ., ,.. : . .., gr. 4,....,„ .„ ,., ,,,..... -_.....,.. ,..: . , - . . 0 7...r.t..-' ;,..' - • '7.-r;Aik l'.. .',!;.."Irt,',. ' ..,00.0...- --.' . " '.. .--- :--' ' : - ' 101a4. • -1-4-'11-"--• - - - .” *'.. ' r .- ". '-7 -- . - ".P;7: ,-i%ti-'-':',-',: ' , '.:',-...-;'•,-.,,,-,',-,.--'--,•-,*"':t.''''' .r.i...7' -'-!- ':. v.-.... 7- 7..... IP/I -40.01 ' . -:.- '' - '• a ig _. ...- .i,-,,,,•. i. -. . ... _ ..-.„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.......: • ., . , .....,.:,,, . _ .... . 4. , .. .. .., „i •, 1%. .. ...,.-,-•:._ ,: ....,. ; .., ,. .„ :.,„, ,.-... ..,.._,..,.4..gii,#.4‘ ......: ,. ._ .. -,,,.,::a --- - * ". ';', ' • . - •••• OP as. r 4 f••.s/ • *0.31 spot t•• akri• 11.•!...•-is•.. -..al4a •.-••.f-',..z- L.7•,,, -P..%7 . ': .,-':.;.;!7:,..11'..•'.-:.;"?--. . se •••••••11--Ai- t-•1 dr e•'- .1 • Cie .• *Ai*.to...i -* ••••.%.4 -:•-,-f.X.3-0 4%,..4 .:..,.• : . , -,... 1.,-F.T,?:.:' .• •.1•11144:0 , • •• • lira••';•• •I1, •• • ,0 • •••• •1814., •flie•-14••• 6-.-' '- 101....--::'7- 'i-'."'..:757 • , : -: :7r.f.r.V.::•:' • .,. . ....1 ' • ••• $4,...•Om" -4010 e. .• **lie -9,*......*..9.1aP9 *9 * Z:04*9ii , „ .t , t. • _ .....„...,.....r. i 0 si deorfor.i.'.ifi,': . -•,- 4 as• t. 41,.....7.-49••ite•• •• ••;*•.. il.:,•411•4404 OA', •sae..---m'por .1---,410•;:.:.:: :.:4: --',4;:ly t If-•-•,-.-.-,. •• ,... ... .,..._; • . ,.... 7 . ••SI 4 e:•-..•Ott**- . cif albs.,•I •••-•owl-f--)ri sr..; • 4/re* -••••114._i!-.,-.--;,- A-•.•,;- "S.:•m- r-::„, -4.--:. ,_. 9,7 f sir •/14,0„..,, ..,..... ,.,.. a,;tie flos- 4.1.•• • ail.4.4.tatat.:••• ;a-•*-•ir,s3,1.:44c.-r::,,:v ;;;_,:„.',.:"', . . :_. :-,.:- - • •414.-••••'6614•0-...-•• •-• 111•••••• • s.• i s..'i C 4 ,*VP,:ft; 44 dkf 1-47;„-,:i.7.;it:;,-,...2 -4:. .1 4.,....1„, •:....,t4r ::;':,.•7:.,_. •.1::', •••• -'iL ':t '7--'7.: -•'-:,.'-•.:::--C,:-.' - •••••• •••4: 0•4•017.4' ••Or• 4.'* •; 4'O." 6..t Il• .).....,E,_,.fi_.-..4.g.,:1 _ :..i.,_;._-...,. ..- - ._.•itirr.•,;Ab•ir 4 11•All ar<ert*,•,.64.- ...? 4:4:.! It' ''''',. . •••• ::,-.!;';',:;;._, ,,'..-1-%, .',f•I :_., .7-:,, V i 7..:-...: , :::'..,;.-;f;,•:-Z-.'i..1 00 ••-•• ea.*? •.•WI.' lie.-. .- * • 11......-,-,-!,4 ,..,,,• P."i,'"er - . '-::,.- •.:-:-•-4;.,-;:• -•:.,'-." '":!'.--•'---,-. :•••- --- 1•4•••m- a.s Goa Ito lieu ft V•1 *Ps •e•r•mr•I**.44 it* 4$, - o•TAIS -...,..,,,,. .„.;:..t„. .em„,..,,,,. z._,e;.. - --_. : ...-..,.., ........,, , -. ..•- •,--' -''''t r------•`..-::---,7,, .:---. ' ,",f....--1::. -• •- • 0-PO •11.msli Ow*or'r**••*009.4•444.''PIP* • a P 11.4.1. a.edIP'".-7--'',;'''1 . N•7•4"S;..--;.,-..•...;,..••'.v-,.,; i--•--••:. ,..<•:!.c.:.7:'.7;44-fi-21 --....t: ' . ": ., . At'MI Si ar Oe Vol iolliP•11*India row* rie•tio far Or .,...;-%.•-th rmrif,A7*N..., ..-...•,,!7-,,,-,...t.5. ":1e'f-,-'t- '7-' ..: '7••••'.....7j , • imarrill• 1•11 is eim.41100)enel• '11.6.eer••••/akar s•a*•••:-44-..:,..4..i : ,-,7,-: 1, ' .- - . , •-. .,-!...-- . . -, -f-. ,-,-,,r • 41,- if •P . •••1 46110 Ils gas.als*wile,to•a••el • • *a oNelo'fre-i'L,1•,:•:1:r,-;-1:;;-• *...• .-, ' ;.... ... .....,,-,;;;::... . - - -".•••,"1:•.'•-- ._::-•'-',.' - •••••••-.,-,.'..,'•' earris_:. „mimosa.-••••,r.•••ems 411/6.4•0 wan:-.bar 66 IP.$401.ix,:..0,,,,;,„..1 4 • ,... ..,-....., .... . ;,.... • ' ' 1 -: •,',--,,.-7-• 7 'I- - ' -1:--%r-- . ei• 4 0116.•••es.oiler•111114.11$ Ili 11111 Agreih••• • •01 ego. ma limo* ...:.-3.,,t.:i-i..-, ..„7,, ,. ...., ...„ 1. ,. ..,.„..... ,.._-, .. •0..aol,a• ea aoli•OP III.II WAWA/IP ',V.,•••• am* ""''''. -*40 ..',4-Z=..,A Vt e,...2.- '.'..:;;;.•....',-....',,,..3.:-,: ::'.... :.-:;''.....,-,,-, , . *A. •• 4.1.4 ,••••*am ea et fa. •a••••*aim tier at; are 3-viorkk,,_2."„4 ;-;..-1, ... ' i ...i.p,.....„ i........... ...,..-,7..,Lf..,,j4.---7-„,,.,, ,. •:-..',-,77, Ap 016•ASIS• 'lair, ..s,a s etas*wsowassi.•amb sees,• • i•••..1.006-,i.,,..z-..• tr,f :, . ........:..-.• w„.-,rer.....iir. -:-' .., ,,,----4-.N.:,: , •...iii. sou slob&aft awe••bps*..,roam. silikaamini:--.,t.i-L-4, --' .ii.,s..k,,...,,,,, ‘,-, .,..;- 7,,„..z......,„.:7;,..4.,-:'i;..-:-..---,-!,,-7-7-g,P7-4....-4.:::::'- -q-'•4'49--1.-- ..,.ike .7.she.se is ap s,••••••••..••it aka%aegi Orr! 11••••••••••-4,p!,,,,„ ..,:,. '.. ::,i.i.14.r,„..ge. ,--;,ti.:::4,,,,;;:,.....,,,,,-...,.:-..7',., ...as ••••*A.;s •••I-•••••••• al-.11•1•11i lit 0114.c••---:. So-44-••••••_4•,,:41-.,:g :-. ,..., . ..".:,;,,,.:-!..,",'3,7:-.4.7,4:.. ..-7,!..,..;,,y,;.f..•,.-,;:.,v_ m '•,,,,•?-,,,-4-:::.7,144.Arl7=i--::, ... ,,....;*' ,,i,-40.• •A‘a4/1/1.44.•IS*, lib 01. -s 8 it',-.41.03•011pg., 0 Ai la'•Mt• a Itill.*...:N il, :vt-',.,..•-3:74:,;;,-;:r-„A-7,...4..4,4,;;,6,::,.;_.-ks..;.1:1-f:.,.!„--• kk,?.'•••;'••1.,:,,,-;i,.:204.gt it, ,-.:_---,..,0 r-•••••••••• fa t•.0•••••••••1•411'.1114 Id dla47$0.*,,f-ar1.1-00411$fa_!:, ..1". 3. f •:'''''":.'::,.:;-,-;- .•'!•;s5:-;._4.e,-..2- :"w•„'4-_-;0•••,-, Trt,,, -.•• _. -.4.4.1 • v*.,*--. sel• .,A••-••••'ol• au 01.c•*94am...a lb;a*:.fl•fs:400#-.At:-././••:*t 11•11 . 1 p -3-- , `,4- 1-4._Lig., "....:•t-T,,,,,_,_,‘6-- ; ,,,,*•.2, -;!•-„,,,;.,45•-„„.741;1-.i. 111•1***OW OS-041. ON 4- i 44 •••••• •/•tht F*••••••lko!roglor:rir;10.3•"altV414-1 e.. • ,A,_,r,,.-4,',i,eviff.,''sts.a,k`_:;-;_",;3.,:s., ,:-•.::..,:,, 1 4'2'..a.t.=.1:1E-U, .„'''- .s.'""., -'._"-'. WA 4,-• a saw ••••• irs, • 041116 Ali ila••71***•••04,1 **Al.-ma-•!..porrot..,_,:rt wi a., t-:,-;-4-,,,- . -4% -.....7,...,- .±:-.--....,n--*;-: •• -,40 •'••*00.-.110••••11, 144 .1*-,••••••••it.044-AL-4W*agekrAlla 904FArv. x17.,-,_4: :-. A. ...,,,,,,,,..,,z4.74.4.:,.., Tr.72.75.-- ,:7%r.,:i..• .,..,.. ... .r,„.... 4.. r ewe 4•••*I•• Askim...-41144$•-•••••Ira A*_•I•.••••••••,•„_,-;-,••A A-•%-.-, „._ 4,1,,,, ,y, ..,7.--.:±ty-• 7:,,,,J-4.-Ittft-,:.:, ,'•:•;.,.1A411„ZAV. ,.....,.:7-r:tsi••:,‘,7LF:4-_,-'i;'•1:'..t ;Alit see el Y.•••••-q• IsAtiof.r. (DILI**ft-•••-•0-t...#*-.0.01••,"-`--1- ,,-1-.1 - --4,47:!‘.-c.`14.:-..-- ....‘•-;:is..-E.•"..A._-it,..t.,.• !',4•-*--•,i•- •:-7,,;',.L'iW•b•-•':•'. '.:•?",.. .VOitt..:i..r•,,.•.,-. 4, aa.,4•••..lose ii,s osals,• I"vt-.r.*4.lois ie 41**•••••••••,••••• 'V.- 1-...:4 -,--._A4711,11..-7.'F!--•-•.-1,,---- e-:.tx-----,,r ;:;!;.g•,-_*, -7- .;---- - 4-„,_-:,- •-: • ".te ...4 c est*as••• ,....4plil 4•11,sot*,gasSiii-411,•••.-.4.-40/40 -,... ...,,,• . .•=. ., itzt-1,-4----17--M-rt ,-i.4.,,...: st ,11•4111•••••%.•Oki' -a eyes••110 ALA 1/•14-A-14•,,,,C,./01.•..••//'4 14.-,40,-.4 6 •, --!f-"--1 '''.?-''J :--• - - -i-f•;---..••- 0.-_:-...--,-;,,i! -t-'-'4--4-T- PAL ' ...-•--'4"..L.,.:',,,....,.w.,..-.,.:-:4, z• '' ,- '''...f";1'"''''',x•,, -- •.,....,...!- If..A..7,;.....;"'.4'Z'.....7.-64.4'.-*•ii airs.-=..-•99 101•••bAINisigt‘P•1111141rt-110Nolkalb ala.'401 aw 11,4• •---,- ',.;'';;--•,,, •-,- .....-4,-c.:F*,..!r-N;:z _•-•-...i:•.t,.z.•:::-.,„-"• ';*!•,_. , ... ..,.,---:.z.,!--,*--4--6,-- ....: i,,;lempi••.•ihk:es,airTV ti,.141,1P,,..014:....ebei•ilt:Aso,1111•04;1••••••••*•sN•• --,-.::-... -:-,•-bp,-.-7 jx-,..„=,_,. i --- - --.-1:::1,i.-:- ..'. '''-'6e'-ior,,--: *_ -:- .,:i7,' ,*•-'-' 1••••!.**111,1C-1/1 se-tilr_-!..4 .-00,•••*.,-.•••;,-.-3m••••••••••*tit ails***0461 : ._30..ja- ....., ;•:, ..*.,:!,•.i.r._;.-CTIr.4. • -,-, .ii„:4:2-tt• -&,,-. ...,-1:.4.-T 111:14iree',44.10% - ' 7.e; i.0,4i211..,.4.045,4• 04,tpoik**• Airell.41..if =,-.i. Ft sl., •----..74, .; :, _ .. 1. :...1.. 4 „,,- _•-:,_,-- :74 ,,,.....-. ,,,i...-,:-.i.•,..---0,14014.;%•733•A. ":„..qf 1•04,4401•4•,p4••••ft•1/..&AV 1,10" gliii 7 -,-- 1,. -4, ••••,,,. -‘ - -t,.. •••- ,4.. -.:. -*. ..' - 4 4.,..,-•9:.v-51.'••:."--Ti..,.....ekrilpi:,,,W.siii.raiii:441,...-•••:,.oirm.‘3•Woltiriosuir."44;:stf.-011.1 -10“1.. .k., ' '.-,'.--- -,,,..,_,... .----:,v, :::.. --.•.,, -.1;:. !' - ill. - --4.'- 4-7:.:r`'..-1.4 '0•4$41,:*$ •••••••••11•44•111.-14•4111*A14,4140....00.14,4elonisipli - f.:t: ' .,i_e i - '.v_;... ,..,',"..4.,,,L. :";•41' .5., . - IgI ";77-:‘..'"'":* !.._-:'-ttie.$-!;Y, 411iirt:;"01**7744,4; ri,..„17. 7'4' ; , 7-131S-;ar ..•* ‘•-i., ,,,,44, :-.2i"--7,,,, '... .-1-slY;t-',.4,1-Vi-!:'-z4;----_-•: '' -- ;Ziro.. -:,',- -'7f.-:crik`i,'-:-''..;=1;--ti41,-T '-'--1'.,-,---1.,,,--.-,-.f .;:..-. - . ._ . .,r-4_%7,,,.-,„, ., „..4..„ t,--I.• _.--.----0, , 4--4-v4 --•- 1...._ ,..-4---.....„1._ , ,.,...,....,.. ,:i.„.„,i...,_.. ,_.‘„?.,......„,,„,._ ... _„.... ....„ _,_. ..„ ........r. _ __._ ..,._ .._ . .,.. 4,.,1 ,-4. itt • .:......;:,,,,, ,,g,-:_,.. 1.-.,..,,,,,,.., -.-*-:,,`;"";'.;':1-4!:;,'•4 r P .: ••••i=-4*pt. ..ivit7g,f7,./ ,.:.. . feta:lc/iv.), ,-:;,-,.-,,-. -P-,..40-4,--54-1:40:14„...,,, -..= .-vr, ,,•.-,.,:-. .,. -2: - :4',..--,-, rts.;. 1102.1.,-47c., _,,,,,,T. „,..r• • ,. •..„ : .‘..,..-,. • ....- 4',..."' ....•e ., :.i1,%;•?.. „ ..•„,,, . ..,,., • *: .` ;...1 . ...- ........:-.-.:--- , .No,...;;--.;-...r,z•l!.,.:-.; „-v.„„....,,..... ..!,T, :'-_'.':''4_...4t14-,_:_-I'.,.•:.4t•t,,Z•.-,-;„,--.i f--•.i4,'e.....q,'..kl-''.,'.,•--•-;,4.11.:%.t;..-•,.--e-'.:c2'r1.4.:.i...c.,4.,..:4*:,.:.--:.-4.P,:.le.,.4.•47t4,i:4o*. '»-.-.kt.."-...... . • % i . . .. 1 • J 0,,,Z; -4„,,,,,,,,t,,,-4.,:;.,,,,:.,\:-.;:a ri.,:::-,.:.:4,,,,,t:t.,.i,".:10,-,7"...,,,00,,,,:ikt ,,,,,,-,-t..,,,:,,,,,r„--Art, i -•-• ,,,,-,..i.„7s,t.1...,, ... .-..-• ...3.t,,, . „.. -; .._ cK,.-:,,'. • .:1, - •i" -11'. -t'll", - ', •,-,-:"'4.::'-'1......''• s;:vlit"- .276......i.......1-.... :•.,....-", 1.-.0,‘- ...,...,12, ,'- „:„.„;,-3.-. .-. . .;.,,i;.*.4441.4,737P.ii:Ora- r-ir,... :AZ14.•::' t,"4". '''''W.N.44.1 ,-7=.4..4k.q.a-gi.,i,t:.-1'.-76 ':',',:tt'-•,'," i-;::73' '•-. .- - i • s: • 1 _ 2..s .irt•...i , k J l v71•4g1tt,. •. s 3 rt::r 11 i/ - ' 7 .rl1 • r r it jCl. . . r .1 �► _ -.N•••4l. K s•• Yaw 1t Las• i M aY - V - �.` ••1'•✓i�:> - • H ads••.y. ...i r • •.•t • 1� an*'••► • 4..Jr • I r r MI,L 11 •• - • ..• i••.•Sl 41,Noe 1•071• ••oar 1" .a +�,�►. r • • .._ , _ 0' y •� it - • , ••♦ ••" ...Is••• ••.•Ybs': a•• •.•w.'. • •"• .. s•. '„" �l tfw. ••4►•i ~� • G1♦ •• t;•r ' J ••..M. J4 N•"•' • ►1.•••h M 1� •.. [• _N:, ,'� .J 1r/. ".iP:�rl ^ / ?. _ .. f' ••J.♦ •:/• ••.•• • •y♦•.• • •........••a.•.-.�a! • p • •• •• •.4. .'•.•lss•-'••a ••.al•'s•. L♦r•f•'• •. gett r • • •••.••••none i.'�Y•4_►•••a •►r•••a♦.••••..• _ ; •- , . •4 ..••w•4'•i •.r.••__aL.a"r••r•••e•...• a I:'• - - . -_a I •T•_•• 'e.t.a....•• 4•..•. •.M••••••I•••• •••tail el .f r e a+a7••••�I••II.dam e•-•,t 01♦i•••• •.. •t.•'• .. • •',. •ar •••/•iw!• •__..r��fir•_•>I1.••I 1• s♦w - ._ - ..I.••1r•.♦••r.ff.•••9►19 sf •i7.M • •r Y•••sawn* _ _ _ • •.• a•a•Si 4b'4.•••a►�'.tlril O-Y•• •.••••Ina• ...orb -..r - i •-'��yT .. •i r•1 f a:•i•M Y t•.f Si a••a'••••••**woe..► •r.•-.... r= "+ C.- .......‘ate• •.•• •.•I.WSW ri1..••4 ♦• .r.h•y L •ae*. Si•$ lamb•Ir 4q.4 N twat•u.9•Ow*•-•./tan.•• i r .• _ " r. `t ' 1•.4..d•.w a ••a•.•Y I •.•••sr•sear f•A tin••••ww ° .:► •Y..• trb toe-t ►..i•.•• <fFa- of ,. • •••••a••••••a••• ••••• •se••••i••!•� •C"' •••••SO n 4 3 . ' ‘.fi .•tom __ • a. i,••••--44 tI•1•.a.•wr w wi L ♦•.4•..• t":I.l..•O•-+,••i sot'- 4.."'� :r-,,,,- a.»t-,, ',a,, m .,��i~Fr rs5•--• �As I..f ••as aliI••,h;.4••••i.t••..a•w we.......•.-I•••. S. t y'2 s' +u-.--c_-ice x�-*ram "- K- +ye* '�" *,-i,'v,•4, tw -1w*1"+ty � •Ys:I•a►J'S.♦.Imp•:'••1'•.ti•�••i:•Oair'.'•Y'•fa•elf ids- T. "7TT. &'A.-.'47:x�it-111.6►.•• • �• a�,�t . .� W`:f .•f••.t•.•Y•"-.11 flls.att•qsi•••esr'r•.ram1.•',astir; � v _� ,xs �y. 4 �"� y a,..,s,..r' t _ - N»' ••:•M•Y••w•A's 1 ••r al•••••r'••4.•.'•• •.•t it we,,.., '¢sue w ,may,, •:.•»+,•.•••••• 7•if cy-•►.\M-JN•a% •• •i .•••sA B ar t- _ T •_ a f.,.C-+: •. s.. :' . .4...;.,-''•.. ..�..> :..••••fr••.II'•., -a,sou..._res!r•ss••:.•I •ar►•• z• - •k.A` -..yUi - �,' a•c -'," . •.• "''',iaY'• •- - •• fi•.�N•.•a• •.assess*•.♦.s• ..••♦ ee••••awaV•swat, �''' • ;y `..- Tom "• •. t_ ' _ 're'.,m_ ._•-' •s. ... 's-'..ar I.1• •.I•••w• 5 .s S'. '4,. 1.i.:x.. s +•+w• yr•_••I•A • - ex ow •{e• 'a x ._e'4.iie4-;..su r * '''g ���� z k 'a`,.. _ 1.•-•••J.♦r a•aa.sago - tea/..•►s°t are•t•.SOS••;.+`�'4 � g. .- ,r ,.,�.. ,. Fr •. - •.T%, dy _ ••••••.•.w Isi♦a s 'r..um •••'a•ate _ ti, °S" 'qs.� 3 1 •4• �3 - � r, •r•f.•• •>:a •♦ le* iMM411 • lb•be fie. K : . �. -1 .♦(x, '*tOs i,. III e.•a ra••..s.•t•... • TTT000 e .t • ••a+'1 •r j•"•1a./M,,,,1• :N"•a_4►'SW*.••.ai^' _ Y r • h w-w•.�+ab.4 •••.•.••Sri•,• t:•.• c,-. s? �'r" t �, �y'4 .. q. T c. •Nfi..N•,••d lwi.•SN •••..1•,•v.. ••. •,* - 1,4 'v ,,'"-14, sf+ .,mks, r it'',.-' •▪' a T f•i•• aa•SJ •••a�a•.1i /A':aat••as.•••t I•••M. a.a•••• k • <u ••a1T x 'd - g4 "? a-: €'i� alt.. `•. 5F41 stt�l r 5: 5.a �r'a d+<c y `yS4'----.: avt'_ > d'� • �r t:-.ri SO�n53 ' i` „ '_ ---. t `.�1 .-j4• ..y 'iw h,t.$v sl'S"tr yt-:.14 s•yt •t,1,,,tife 1.14 ,4i2w .',,'...,..•,...fit. x 4, "'t- .tom • :��... is Y , „;: , 4 ". .„,,,,.... X",i'?i�. •,,,, 19. .ids,,,, .••♦ frr.e tr � '• ',Ti` 9 •� 'yR* '♦ /` e Y !C• --. '..• Cp*. l�arl r. '"' .` .7.'' '',1.y i ,t a-t fhb its_ -I.1,'vS 'li',. ♦ . .r -Y.' •'} •-'.ate .,pz , a a • 7i a f y ..9 p _ •yt¢ s+ s� t} lt�rn 1 t S ,i'.aT '�.p '. (a•N Mi.. _ 'tl+1. a . r 1s'rc .. 14. r: ]e. 1,- }�q..lT. iys Trr • -�c�l , s '' f n• }.•1 •s r " .4..4�t - L-+r i .f .. AL--...! k. • *. C S r !..�iY.o: r� " r. ;!` .k. C. : +. s. eer ier' x.� *�`ir•„ (E y 'f - v tst 4. '- ..1 . •4 CITY ,F RENTON „LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 24, 2000 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Robert A. Hinnen CITY OF RENTON Trammell Crow Residential MAR 2 2001 SW River Drive 2000 Portland,OR 97201 RECEIVED SUBJECT: RELEASE OF EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS PROPERTY Dear Mr. Hinnen: Your request for a release of easement regarding the above referenced property has just been referred to me (your request was included in a letter to the city dated August 30, 1999). We regret the lack of a timely response and hope that this delay has not created an inconvenience for you. We are now committed to proceeding with this request as quickly as possible and have enclosed an application form that the property owner needs to complete. If the property owner is a corporation, we need the signature of an individual authorized to sign for such a request. Provide proof of authorization with the application form. Also include the legal description and a map of the easement to be released. The attachments to the application form explain in greater detail the necessary requirements and the processing procedure of a release of easement request. Refer to these attachments as needed. Please note that the release process typically takes two to three months. Submit the completed application form, along with a filing fee payment of$100.00, to the City Clerk on the 7"' Floor of the Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, 98055. Please make the check payable to the City of Renton. If you have any questions, please call me at(425)430-7312. Sincerely, jd e , Sonja J. Fesser Engineering Specialist,Planning/Building/Public Works cc: Jennifer Henning David Christensen I I:\DI VISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2000-I52.doc\SJF\tb 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 23, 2000 TO: Dave Christensen FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning(x 7286) SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe—Request to Abandon Utility Easement I have received a request from Trammell Crow Residential to abandon a utility easement located in the middle of the Tamaron Pointe Apartment site at 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard. No utilities are located in the easement that was reserved for utility purposes by the City when a portion of Pelly Place North was vacated. A copy of Trammel Crow's letter and documentation is attached. Could you please have one of your staff work on release/abandonment of the easement? Thank you. \\CENTRAL\SYS 2\DEPTS\PBP W\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.S ER\DE V&PLAN.INGUTH\tcrrscv.doc\cor March 20, 2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 97 CARRIED. (See page 98 for ordinance.) EDNSP: Automall Overlay Planning &Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report District Amendments (Areas recommending that the Council set a public hearing for April 10, 2000 to "A"and `B") consider amendments to Area"A"and Area"B"of the Automall Overlay District, and to Section 9-14-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of-way Vacations. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Development Services: Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Tamaron Pointe Apts Removal recommending concurrence with the staff recommendation to authorize the of Restrictive Covenants (Lk removal of restrictive covenants that were required as a condition of the rezone of Wash Blvd), R-81-090 the Tamaron Pointe Apartments property in 1983 from Trailer(T)to Residential (R-3). The covenants require: 1. Voluntary payment of$6,450 for specific traffic improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard. 2. Requirement for specific off-site public street improvements including: installation of a left turn lane opposite the entrance to the lakeside site; provision of curbs,gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting and all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the lakeside site; provision of asphalt surface temporary sidewalks from the property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Park;traffic control (signage and striping) for pedestrians crossing Lake Washington Boulevard from the east to the west side near the north entrance to Coulon Park, provided that the applicant would not be required to duplicate these improvements. 3. Requirement that no development of the project is to occur to the east of the toe of the slope as defined in the restrictive covenants. 4. Requirement that the number of dwelling units proposed would be restricted to 187;provided,however,that in the event of a zoning change to permit more units than 187, such zoning change would supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. The covenants were required as a condition of rezoning of the property in 1983 (R-81-090). The restrictive covenants require certain off-site improvements or restrict development on the site. The covenants are no longer relevant as they have either been satisfied or have been supplanted by subsequent rezoning of the property. In addition, approval of the land use permits for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments further render the restrictive covenants unnecessary. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance: Vouchers Payroll Vouchers 24534 -24755, and 527 direct deposits totaling $983,404.44. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utility: Utility Shutoffs (City Councilman Parker announced that in 1993, at the request of then- Policy and Procedures) Councilmember Nancy Mathews,the City Council had referred the subject of enforcement of utility liens and related claims for damages to the Finance Committee. He felt that this subject would best be broached in Committee of the Whole so all Councilmembers could participate in the discussion and any CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: • For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works 3/13/00 Development Services Division Staff Contact Jennifer Toth Henning Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Request to Remove Restrictive Covenants from Public Hearing.. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS (Lake Correspondence.. Ordinance Terrace Park Associates Rezone R-090-81) Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Information Issue Paper Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Planning and Development Committee for March Legal Dept Finance Dept 17, 2000 Meeting Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Trammell Crow Residential has requested that the City Council remove Restrictive Covenants imposed on the subject site per rezone File No. R-90-81. The covenants require: 1. Voluntary payment of$6,450 for specific traffic improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard. 2. Requirement for specific off-site public street improvements including: installation of a left turn lane opposite the entrance to the Lakeside site;provision of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting and all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the Lakeside site; provision of asphalt surface temporary sidewalks from the property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Park; traffic control (signage and striping)for pedestrians crossing Lake Washington Boulevard from the east to the west side near the north entrance to Coulon Park, provided that the applicant would not be required to duplicate these improvements. 3. No development of the project is to occur to the east of the toe of the slope as defined in the restrictive covenant. 4. The maximum number of dwelling units proposed would be restricted to 187;provided, however, that in the event of a zoning change to permit more units than 187, such zoning change would supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. City Council approved a rezone of the property from Trailer (T) to Residence (R-3) in December 1983, subject to the filing of Restrictive Covenants as summarized above. In 1993, the southern three-quarters of the property was rezoned to Trailer (T), and the northern one-quarter of the property was rezoned to MultiFamily - Infill (MF-I) during the citywide zoning update. In 1994, H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\)TH\tamagd.doc/ the interim zoning map of the City was amended to change the zoning classification of the southern three-quarters of the property from Trailer (T) to Multi-Family - Infill (MF-I) as a Comprehensive Plan Errata request. The owner has requested that the restrictive covenants be removed from the property title. The covenants place an unnecessary burden on the property inconsistent with property development standards adopted by the City. The covenants sunset in December 2025, however, many of the conditions have either been met, or no longer apply to the property. City Policy and Procedure No. 400-13 establishes a formal process that allows the City to review an applicant's request to remove a restrictive covenant. The covenant removal process requires tht approval of the original decision-making body. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the request to remove the restrictive covenants. Staff recommends that Council approve the request to remove the restrictive covenants. H:\DIV IS ION.S\DEV ELOP.S ER\DEV&PLAN.ING VTH\tamagd.doc/ CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: 03/06/00 TO: Randy Corman, President City Council Members VIA: �,.� Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Jennifer Henning(X7286) SUBJECT: Request to Remove Restrictive Covenants ISSUE: The applicant requests that the City Council authorize the removal of Restrictive Covenants imposed on the subject site per Rezone File No. R-90-81. The property was rezoned in 1983 from Trailer(T)to a medium density residential designation, Residence (R-3) subject to the recording of restrictive covenants. The covenants are as follows: A. Prior to publication of the rezone ordinance for application R-090-81, the applicant shall provide a total of$6,450 as a voluntary payment to the City of Renton, which shall constitute the total contribution, and shall be used exclusively for the traffic improvements and associated work identified in #1, 2, and 3 below: 1. Widen 800 lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 feet between Park Drive and Houser Way to widen 800 lineal feet of Lake at its approach to the intersection of North Park Drive. 2. Update the traffic signal control at the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard and North Park Drive. 3. Improve the intersection of Burnett Avenue North and Lake Washington Boulevard to accommodate left turns across traffic southbound toward the proposed development. B. The following off-site public street improvements shall be a condition of any development permit issued by the City and are to be accomplished coincident with the development of the site should such development be pursued by the applicant and approved by the City. The applicant may request, and the Board of Public Works may consider, a deferral of any of the work in accordance with the then applicable City codes. C. Provide the total cost for installing the left turn lane opposite the entrance to the Lakeside site. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.S E R\DE V&PLAN.IN GVTH\tamiss.doc\cor D. Provide the off-site improvements of Lake Washington Boulevard, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting, together with all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the Lakeside site. E. Provide asphalt surface, gravel-based temporary sidewalks, 6 feet in width from the subject property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Beach Park, to be located and installed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Department of Public Works, said plans and improvements to include necessary associated drainage appurtenances. Further, traffic control for pedestrian crossing over Lake Washington Boulevard from its east side to its west side in the location of the north entrance to Gene Coulon Park would be provided, such traffic control to consist of striping and associated signing to the extent that such sidewalk improvements have been otherwise provided, this applicant is not required to duplicate those improvements. F. No development of this project is to occur east of the toe of the slope as identified on that certain survey recorded under King County Auditor File #7912119007, Book 21,pg. 168 of Surveys. G. Lake Terrace Associates shall amend their reclassification application to limit the maximum number of dwelling units requested to 187;provided, however, that in the event that the zoning limitation of the subject area described in Exhibit "A"should change by ordinance so as to permit more units than 187, then such zoning change shall supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. On July 14, 1983, Lake Terrace Park Associates represented by Gerard M. Shellan,formally amended their rezone application pursuant to the stipulations executed by both parties on June 15, 1983, and subsequently included in the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 23, 1983. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve the request to remove the restrictive covenants. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Restrictive covenants were required by the City Council in 1983 as a condition of approval of a rezone for the property located east of Gene Coulon Park at 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard. The property was rezoned from Trailer(T)to Residence(R-3) in December 1983, subject to the filing of restrictive covenants as noted above. In 1993,the southern three-quarters of the property was rezoned to Trailer(T), and the northern one-quarter of the property was rezoned to Multi- Family—Infill (MF-I)during the citywide zoning update. In 1994,the interim zoning map of the City was amended to change the zoning classification of the southern three-quarters of the property from Trailer(T)to Multi-Family—Infill (MF-I)as a Comprehensive Plan Errata request. The owner, Trammell Crow Residential,has requested that the restrictive covenants be removed from the property title. The covenants plan an unnecessary burden on the property inconsistent with property development standards adopted by the City. The covenants sunset in December 2025, however, many of the covenants have been satisfied, either previously or via conditions imposed on the approved land use development currently underway. H:\DI VIS ION.S\DEVELOP.S ER\DEV&PLAN.INGVTH\tazniss.doc\cor Item "A", the payment of funds totaling$6,450,was paid to the City of Renton Building Department on December 22, 1983,thus satisfying this requirement. Traffic improvements specified in"A 1"through"A 3"were accomplished by the City utilizing the funds received from the owner. Item "B"identifies off-site public street improvements that should be a condition of any development permit issued by the City coincident with site development. The street improvements are specified in Items "C, D, and E." Item "C" refers to the "Lakeside site"which is understood to be the Marina Landing Apartments developed by Lincoln Lakeside Associates. The left-turn lane referred to in Item "C,"and the off-site street improvements specified in Item "D"along Lake Washington Boulevard "curbs, gutters sidewalks, and street lighting"were installed at the time that Marina Landing was constructed. Likewise,the improvements for the benefit of pedestrians, as required by Item "E"(sidewalks, signage,and crosswalks to Coulon Park)have also been previously installed. Item "F"limits development of the Tamaron Pointe site such that none is to occur east of the toe of the slope as referenced in the covenant. No development has been proposed or approved east of the toe of the slope on the subject site. The site is presently under construction, and City Codes preclude development of the steep slope areas referenced, rendering Item "F"unnecessary. Item "G"established a limit of 187 dwelling units on the subject site,but allows for subsequent zoning changes to supercede and supplant this portion of the restrictive covenants. The Tamaron Pointe Apartments are being developed with 182 units,meeting both Item "G"and the density requirements of the current RM-I Zone. CONCLUSION: As discussed in the Background Summary above, improvements and restrictions to development as specified in Restrictive Covenants imposed as a condition of rezoning the property in 1983 have been satisfied. Subsequent changes to the site's zoning, and approval of a development plan for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments (currently under construction) further render the restrictive covenants unnecessary. The covenants have either been met or are no longer relevant to the subject site. cc: Jana Hanson H:1DI VISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGUfH\tamiss.doc\cor CORR= LEGAL D' :RIPTION OF 'PMA'l Lt;x'1'AJN l :LNAlJ 1CC LUISLE•„ U NJJC.n I\LL . i COUNTY ;ORDINt. NO. 8312050533 r DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS r r.v • WHEREAS, Lake Terrace Park Associates is the owner of the following•r alp,u '911 property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit OF 87/12/12 4f..-'1$2 "A" attached hereto. RECD F • .Q'Yii.I r:PSHS . Ln WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following �-1 restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above Lid described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: A. Prior to publication of the rezone ordinance for application R-090-81, the applicant shall provide a total of $6,450 as a voluntary payment to the City of Renton, which fund shall constitute the total contribution, and shall be used exclusively for the traffic improvements and associated work identified in 4I1, 2, and 3 below: 1. Widen 800 lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 11) feet between Park Drive and Houser Way to widen 800 lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard at its approach to the intersection of North Park Drive. 2. Update the traffic signal control at the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard and North Park Drive. 3. Improve the intersection of Burnett Avenue North and Lake Washington Boulevard to accommodate left'turns across traffic southbound toward the proposed development. B. The following off-site public street improvements shall be a condition of any development permit issued by the City and are to be accomplished coincident with the development of the site should such development be pursued by the applicant and approved by the City. The applicant may request, and the Board of Public Works may consider, a deferral of any of the work in accordance with the then applicable City codes. C. Provide total cost for installing the left turn lane opposite the entrance to the Lakeside site. D. Provide off-site improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street lighting, together with all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the Lakeside site. E. Provide asphalt surface, gravel-based temporary sidewalks, 6 feet in width from the subject property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Beach Park, to be located and installed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Department of Public Works, said plans and improvements to include necessary associated drainage appurtenances. Further, traffic control for pedestrian crossing over Lake Washington Boulevard from its east side to its west side in the location of the north entrance to Gene Coulon Park would be provided, such traffic control to consist of striping and associated signing to the extent that such sidewalk improvements have been otherwise provided, this applicant is not required to duplicate those improvements. • F. No development of this project is to occur east of the toe of slope as identified on that certain survey recorded under King County Auditor File #7912119007, Book 21, pg. 168 of Surveys. G. Lake Terrace Associates shall amend their reclassification application to limit the maximum number of dwelling units requested to 187; provided, however, that in the event that the zoning limitation of the subject area described in Exhibit "A" should change by ordinance so as to permit more units than 187, then such zoning change shall supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. On July 14, 1983, Lake Terrace Park Associates represented by Gerard M. Shellan, formally amended their rezone application pursuant to the stipulations GO executed by both parties on June 15, 1983, and subsequently included in the 11 decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 23, 1983. O ri THESE COVENANTS shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. r-t r) CO Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Managing Partners: 4- ALEX CUGINIJ R. J. S VE RARER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of King ) On this 94-k day of November, 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared ALEX CUGINI, JR., & STEVE HARER, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they signed the said instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. 6P(5'10 P Notary Public in ,...d for the State of Washington, residing at g 73 o So. h. therein. Sect f(e �L]4 Sh. - 2- 8i74 FILED for R^r:r.rd at Reauest� et 1) , 0 111 csOM47117 &elf CO ,5 aNyC..S MNYO Y(. EE dm. a0r A�` JeL7.4 's �4FIF [I ;"- I .` r ,A/\\ `‘‘\.:'/r-,-1..--,-(7._41...7.1",:.;,010p 7..y, ? Z _-1./04,4----- ‘0,,40* • ww0. .4.44.1:'.:;•./Ve 44..044 4. 1_ ,:,.;aj. ... , / /„ ... .,% � /'/ ii� �/�-" `�'fij � �i'/l�i t �� ��7��'�,�Y'I� �'!' i� r. i 5. - • , •.." ..:„.„,„...„___• , v„..e) ,.. if �rPd nip" !1 �/— %/% 4/ — % e.` �j f �\ ` •j�/\VP4A41i, "I':..- Op' ,,,-,,,,,..--,v �•�� .. I' rP- / - '"" 0 _ - ---ito-fc.:7%,------ ---',:x',70 ...j..1.1kwi 4% ... isirT:or:,::.::::',.// x407.V>____y-V e4 var" n. ' 3;:: ,::.%:"..,:.>>./ ik IN 4, AreV.,611:10:i**:::.VIrr•,, .-%":-//,' Or' MINIM i IllilliIK&% •.10.1.1•T'l - Ktolfo .c<*4744." ,....:-// . 0 '% ‘, ,:aik 01#4:-.',....1- \*- - 0 . -4. ' x%- .......--- 40000400 SNYe z?-"- _,/ z i 8 4 " 4;',-'-' -).---/%."; iiiis .,,,, &, ,c,, • ,,,,,o,.,-• ....:- , --:' ' r . .. * ' ' 4 1 ' -er.Ari 0��", � , I r � ./�i � d�'n, " � /j f r� p � � . v Hi! 'S 4444,7* 10)7 S.14/A. %.- -,"';--=.-?4" ,://041. ii/ < t , r •v-,,, •Atiffei-e,iitoPy.c.itt..T',',- X ...- ..... 7 NORM .z z'/4'7 Z ,fri#%4V dt. ,. .*.;.;- ' '''. 11' . ,'° o 0+ ;',, ,,' % .) ,...401.- -A, ...-/ *. IrA,\I! ' - loe'---4,4# /.,'„a 915-20 ,-,ro ' 47 v Arii,o>7 •4644 ---,---,:t.-_,----- / ' . : illit1114•..‘ilitA„,/,'"' .. 4/ I tIrVer- Al4 411*.Y/*...41*fr '' ''' ' , Apik,,,,dt, tooloyti, 4, ---,- ,.- \' ..°15 N'‘. 414'q IA r 4141 1P4.11 I CA I re*, /,<14/4:4°'' .‘5 f' til)r-JP. \ -__-_-_-.. .:777,.:,,,,,,e,- . .... i ,/ Jj-P7)- ,--,-._---,:,-,-y/," . .-tri„svb . , ,/,,-;;____ - . ..,,,, , ...., T_______ (IC o PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS % 48, POLICY & PROCEDURE Subject: I Index: PLANNING/BUILDING/ REMOVAL AND/OR MODIFICATION OF • I PUBLIC WORKS RESTRICTIVE.COVENANTS ( Number: 400-13 Effective Date I Supersedes I Page . .Staff Contact I Approvc- 1.0 . By • 2/9/90 I • N/A I i of 1 I Jim Hanson I PURPOSE: To establish a procedure for the removal and/or modification of restrictive covenants. 2.0 ORGANIZATIONS AFFECTED: • , All departments/divisions . • 3.0 REFERENCES: N/A 4.0 POLICY: • • It shall be the policy of the City of Renton to formally consider the applicant's request for the removal or • modification of restrictive covenants. Over time, the conditions prompting the original covenants may ( change. A formal process to allow the removal of restrictive covenants will allow the City to be responsive to changing site conditions. 5.0 DEFINITIONS: Restrictive Covenants: A restriction on the use of land usually set forth in the deed, but may also be added by the use of another recorded document. Restrictive covenants usually run with the land and, if running with the land, are binding upon subsequent owners of the properly. However, some restrictive covenants may run for specific periods of time. 6.0 PROCEDURE: 6.1 Property owners wishing to remove or alter restrictive covenants must submit a written application to the decision-making body, or its successor body or individual, which had the final- authority to require the covenant originally. At minimum, the application must include a recorde( copy of the restrictive covenants to be altered, legal description, and a letter explaining the need for removal/modification. 6.1.1 The fee, if any, will be as set forth in Section 5-5-1 or the Renton Municipal Code. 6.1.2 The City may require notification of surrounding property owners, beneficiaries of tr covenant other than the general public and any parties of record. 6.1.3 The applicant must be able to demonstrate to the original decision-making bod successor that there has been a change in circumstances (i.e. new Comprehe' designation or zoning designation) so as to make the covenant undesirable standpoint or that the covenants are duly burdensome on the property o'' • taken by the property owner cannot be used as a basis to claim undue r Architecture&Planning rma oiv .0 AMR n 3?/�,, March 1, 2000 E'Cc "�/ /VET Ms. Jennifer Henning City of Renton 1055 South Brady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments LUA-98-123, Dear Jennifer: Item no, 6 of the Hearing Examiner's letter of April 2, 1999 requires a pedestrian connection from the north end of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. To comply we added a stair to the site plan because of the±27' change in grade. We would like to request changing from the stair to installing a sidewalk running along the entry drive at the north end of the side. Now that the driveway grading and rockeries are installed we have room to do this and feel it would provide a more usable access. I have attached a plan of the sidewalk for your review. Thank you for considering our request. Sincerely, Rutledge Maul Architectts, PP,S. Inc, David B. Maul AIA Vice president CC: Rob Hinnen-TCR Millard Thacker-TCR Darrin Sanford-Pacific Eng. Rutledge Maul Architects,P.S. Inc. 19336 47th Ave.N.E. Seattle,WA 98155(206)440-0330 FAX 362-4381 --N'Ne' _---:,• ,.,' — , .„-•-' „ • _. , \ . ,_, i,,,,-- , "I'%,,,, \ -,,, "•.-- --.,.., •000r- alryle 7s4Vtalo 7---- ---. le 9 414i \_ )11 • Al a S ik /-•" .4.; AIIIP el \---..., k...,,,, ..•• •00 .-- "-T..-- 4"-..: ' iFi , \-_,,, • )r-Jvcalas AZ -------. . 47 -- .,..---' .6741°' :- .• 1 4ip, \--0., \ \ ..1 1 1 v* 44Akit AA t *„. ITIV•, .., 0001111ft......^1e1- ---.- ,,, -,:-,-•'` ,41, kal lit itillb. _,4. . . co vt5\ N. ...-- . . .....1..L.,, ,,.,k .,,,,,ri...a."aro _., os 00 C., • /. 6", • ft•........... *, _.....7---_, --..e.idaw- it".0••"-- loots, , 41 ' , • ..... f/ ,...-. . libildidiliklPit • 414,it . \ 46,_\ ‘46. 1--c'' ...elbigilllit*SlOtik* A1/4,47, w--4-k- // /7----,...__ • -----.04A1101; co 0-1.-11•411,111314 1011.11ttf, a •,,, 1 .4 ottitto • • .0 1, , lip 4••• \ 2 CZ 2 G 4 Z ill 1 11=-i•-• 101100101111 kit --..„.,.. .47 l* ' to 1100 )!to 1.41-" 7! ft GU • tx CC- .t.-4----- -Towpavii,,, , A VI % LL -Le e Ai 111/4 It, 4 VI, C;L.I W- #A&I‘1.4*Tit*: 7 / 11111 .is *—s0.1114 I---.7.°'1101 ef 0 \.... • • ik 1_ ill, 0.•.....,,E-.$ 0 4.0 1.,1•0( ,, .4.--1 ., ,..„Ili VA Ali 0 lik wi 1 A foiatw---..._ 410 * ••sot 0 oto<Y) 4- •••11 .0,- dr' - -.' lkik Ilk Ailikil.- COL % % , (C) Il _ 0 4 \ # •16 661 * 961 997C 6 Va 3.0At ----- 6 illr if. 11 ''..--- .,,,-.=0......, - p. . 1..• €.„. 440 ; ..._ rd ./' --- .-- --- 11UW Ilk \•7 osi ave 1.`Lii 40 co A "f‘ A 0) •• Lel 0 L61 ,,,46 VP' 46% 401 .,-:,,....,-,, •0072.1 To\ 9e 19Z"9. 000 • % 0., 1 iik lik of,- •eii. dido 11 4-' Si lel "1 161 \. Oil. 9 %9 -91".".• -',. .- esti, 110 fh • 06 t 9t II li, 991 4:404e .1 %1,il I 111 10 I 1 I.I.11111,: I I I I I ill iit I * ..*-, "I "I WI Afe '11,46 c 1 t\ • \ et. 'Le -- -c..01 esa 01 Gal %, Val 140 yr- ..„. clq .i. * _....011 la,TA, s L ...tel' t *07 Li...4 -TL1 L.% -- T CR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST 2001 SW River Drive Portland,OR 97201 Telephone: (503) 241-3768 Fax:(503)241-3462 Facsimile Transmittal To: 2v�n�I 4ettl n i n From: CRob Hinnen ❑ Bill McCann ❑ Clyde Holland ❑ Fiona Ward Fax No: ( I2 ) i4 i`- �30(� ❑ Ann House ❑ Don White ❑ Scott Matthews Date: 12'/ 151619 No. Pages: 5 Comments: A tt-excJAQA Q iv,.‘31_ ex. ,C .0; sec KaiivtU t7T+�1-L T try s r ay, - 61,`-5 c,. 711,(A 1 -f k_- rtat- _cd^4 s. 1,� c YN-e— o _ 4 ef 'C ` fn(,Sl lr -f 2; 4 r d\ iL p Hard Copy Sent Via: Q Mail ❑ Federal Express ❑ Courier ❑ Other >(None If you do not receive pages indicated above,please notify.us immediately. G/l lU [ ' ON dDl Nd00 : Z 666 ! 11 . 080 r CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: 11/29/99 TO: Sonja Fesser FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Native Growth Protection Easement Sonja,please review the attached Native Growth Protection Easement and Restrictive Covenants. I have attached copies of your previous comments. Please note that the Native Growth Protection Easement should not be granted to the City,but rather, should be retained by the owners, and protected by the easement. Call if you have questions. My extension is 7286. Thank you. Document2\cor STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that and signed this instrument and acknowledged that he/she/they was/were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the and of to be the free and voluntary of such party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: 2 TCR Robert Hinnen TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENIIAL Development Associate Pacific Northwest 2001 S.W.River Drive Portland,OR 97201 (503)952-7739 FAX(503)241-3462 November 10, 1999 Via Federal Express Ms. Jennifer Henning City of Renton City Hall, 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Native Growth Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictions for Tamaron Pointe Apartment Community Dear Jennifer: Enclosed please find copies of the Native Growth Protection Easement and the Declaration of Restrictions that have revised legal descriptions attached. I am also enclosing copies of maps of the easement areas for the Native Growth Protection Easement and an ALTA survey of the property. Please let me know as soon as possible if these documents are acceptable and I will have the originals recorded. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, 1KitCL, Robert A. Hinnen Development Associate Enclosures ♦/ :4 Cif• P.' RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor November 8, 1999 Mr.Norman M. Peterson 3402 Park Avenue North Renton,WA 98056-1913 SUBJECT: LAKE TERRACE MOBILE HOME PARK/TAMARON POINTE APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Peterson: I am in receipt of your letter dated October 20th and appreciate the concerns you expressed therein. In this letter I hope to address the two principal issues you raise, redevelopment of the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park as a multi-family residential project, and dislocation of the residents of the mobile home park. You are correct in your observation that the entire lower portion of the project site,up to the toe of the slope,was cleared of vegetation for the proposed development. However,no land clearing is permitted in the steep hillside area on the east portion of the site. The developer's proposal leaves this area undisturbed. Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park existed in this location for many years. In 1993,all properties in the City of Renton were rezoned to implement the 20-year Comprehensive Plan under the State of Washington Growth Management Act. As a result of citywide rezoning,about three-quarters of the Lake Terrace site was zoned for mobile homes,and the remainder zoned for multi-family residential development. Subsequently,at the request of the property owners,the City Council considered rezoning the entire property to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RMI),consistent with zoning immediately to the south. The RMI Zone permits densities of 10 to 20 units per acre on the site. Several meetings and hearings were held on the rezone request,and the Lake Terrace Homeowners were represented in those hearings. The rezone to Residential Multi-Family—Infill was approved in June 1994. The property owners entered negotiations with private developers to redevelop the site consistent with the RMI Zone. In 1998,Tramell Crow Residential(TCR)applied to the City to re-develop the site with a 182-unit apartment complex,Tamaron Pointe. On August 15, 1998,and in accordance with State Law, a one-year advance notice of proposed site development was given to the residents of the mobile home park. The City conducted environmental review and held public hearings. This included hearing an appeal filed by the Lake Terrace Home Owner's Association. The project was approved earlier this year,and no further appeals were filed. The developer has provided relocation assistance to the residents of the mobile home park. A housing specialist was hired in late 1998 to work with the residents to relocate their mobile homes. I understand that the developer and residents reached an agreement that included a financial settlement for the residents to offset the costs of moving. The City's Community Services Department also provided assistance to residents when needed. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • Development of land is occurring along Lake Washington Boulevard. This is true throughout Renton, as envisioned in the State's Growth Management Act(GMA). The GMA required that cities and counties plan for population growth over a 20-year period. Growth is to concentrate in the cities as a way of preserving forest and agricultural land beyond urban areas. In meeting the mandates of GMA, Renton's City Council adopted new zoning to accommodate a range of housing opportunities including single family homes on smaller lots, and areas of multi-family development, as in the case of the Lake Terrace site. Implementing the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning provides many new opportunities for housing in the City and, as you have noted, can result in the displacement of existing residents. Property owners have the right to propose development consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and zoning regulations, or to sell their land to others. When a private property owner applies to develop or redevelop their land,the City is obligated by law to accept and process those applications. If the development is consistent with adopted plans and codes of the City,then it must be approved. Government cannot intercede in property owners' decisions to sell their land to developers. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the former residents of Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park. I hope this letter explains the decision-making process the City must abide by. Please feel free to contact Jennifer Henning at(425)430-7286 should you wish to discuss this or if you have further concerns. Sincerely, 424 77 34/110//6 --- Gregg Zimmerman P/B/PW Administrator cc: City Clerk/Referral#99050-C Jesse Tanner,Mayor Renton City Council Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON NOV 12 1999 RECEIVED UCI . LU • iyyy L . Ii No . yUn P. 1 17-1-7 Robert tiianen TI.AMME.LL CROW PC9rDP.N'I rkl, Development Associate Pacific Northwest 200] S.W.River Drive PorlLuid,OR 97201 (503)952-7739 • FAX(503)241-3462 October 20, 1999 Via Facsimile — (425) 430-7300 Ms. Jennifer Henning City of Renton City Hall, 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Park Fee / Building Permit Tamaron Pointe Dear Jennifer: Our park fee is calculated at $64,520.82. I understand that we can receive a credit against our park fee of up to 1/3 of the fee for recreation facilities provided. One-third of $64,520.82 is $21,506.94. The construction cost of the pool, spa, pool deck, barbecue area, and associated amenities will be approximately $75,000. In addition, we are widening the bike lane on Lake Washington Blvd. from four to five feet. I am having the check for the building permit fees reduced by $21,506.94. I plan to deliver the check and pick up the permit tomorrow. Jennifer, thank you very much for your assistance. Best regards, Robert A. Hinnen Development Associate cc: Jan Conklin CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 20, 1999 TO: Jennifer Henning FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Native Growth Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictions Legal Description Reviews • Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced Tamaron Pointe submittal and have the following comments: Easement No. 3 of the Native Growth Protection Easement legal description document needs to note the bearing to center for the curve with a radius of 1532.66 feet. Also, Easement No. 4 of said document needs to note the bearing to center for the curve with a radius of 816.27 feet. In addition, there is a discrepancy in the length of the arc having a radius of 816.27 feet(noted in both said Easements 3 and 4)between the legal description(116.96 feet)and the map exhibits(111.95 feet). The phrase"a distance"has been left out of the legal description for Parcel 4 (in said Native Growth Protection Easement document). The geometry for the above legal descriptions can not be checked until the requested bearings to center have been provided. The page numbers of said legal descriptions need to be renumbered if they are to be attached to the Native Growth Protection Easement document. The Declaration of Restrictions document notes under the"Legal Description" section on Page 1 that an additional legal description is noted on"Page 5." Said Page 5 is not attached. Is"Exhibit A," attached as the last page in the October 6, 1999, submittal to the City, to be"Page 5"for the Declaration of Restrictions document? Said exhibit is not numbered as"Page 5." It should be noted that this exhibit is not complete as presented. Parcel 3 is only partially described and Parcel 4 is not described at all. Is there an ALTA survey of the subject site? If so,please provide us with a copy. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\U:\SFESSER\TAMARNPT.DOC NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY OF THOSE COMMON BOUNDARY LINES AS ESTABLISHED IN THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT FILED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8509110605; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2: LOTS 39, 40 AND 41 OF ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 41 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1020457; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26, ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE WEST 172 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 27, ELDON ACRES, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF NE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 5, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY (200 FEET IN WIDTH) OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4: THAT PORTION OF A CITY OF RENTON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., HAVING A WIDTH OF 50 FEET KNOWN AS PELLY PLACE NORTH (FORMERLY 102ND PLACE SOUTHEAST) AS SITUATED WITHIN THE PLAT OF ELDON ACRES AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGES 86A AND 868, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 28 AND SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 16'57'45" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET OF 433.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAID PLAT; PAGE 1 OF 7 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINT LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE NORTH 88'37'15" WEST A DISTANCE OF 52.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ORDINANCE NO. 1824; THENCE NORTH 16'67'45" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 405.81 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 39; THENCE NORTH 59'59'06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8711230876; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SAID PORTION IS A NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: EASEMENT 1 COMMENCING POINT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-A FOR EASEMENT 1 COINCIDES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY UNE S59'59' 07"W A DISTANCE OF 25.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S46'56'16"W A DISTANCE OF 109.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N72'58'18"E A DISTANCE OF 123.04 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING ALONG THE PROPERTY UNE N16'57'44"W A DISTANCE OF 53.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-A. EASEMENT 2 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N73'02'16"E A DISTANCE OF 5.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-B; THENCE S16'59'15"E A DISTANCE OF 71.64 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S28'54'36"E A DISTANCE OF 96.32 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ALONG THE PROPERTY UNE N16'57'44"W FEET A DISTANCE OF 165.87 TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 19.97 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-B. EASEMENT 3 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N73'02'16"E A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 189.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 42.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINTOF BEGINNING-C; THENCE S10'50'46"E A DISTANCE OF 179.63 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S02'50'58"E A DISTANCE OF 124.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S09'28'14"E A DISTANCE OF 63.06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SO3'05'53"E A DISTANCE OF 85.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S11'08'57"E A DISTANCE OF 56.05 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S13'06'30"E A DISTANCE OF 48.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S2326'45"E A DISTANCE OF 41.11 FEET TO A POINT ON A PROPERTY UNE; PAGE 2 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINT LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE FOLLOWING THE PROPERTY LINE N00'37'16"E A DISTANCE OF 474.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'18'44"E A DISTANCE OF 57.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE CONCAVE ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 4.24 FEET HAVING A RADIUS OF 1532.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 116.19)`FEET HAVING A RADIUS OF 816.27 FEET TO A POINT; t .1 .9 S THENCE RETURNING N8817'14"W A DISTANCE OF 131.78 FEET TO A TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-C. EASEMENT 4 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 189.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 174.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE CONCAVE ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF (116.19 FEET HAVING A RADIUS OF 816.27 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 4.24 FEET HAVING A RADIUS OF 1532.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 57.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SO0'37'16"E A DISTANCE OF 497.32 FEET TO A TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-D; THENCE S89'22'44"E A DISTANCE OF 31.51 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S2813'39"W A DISTANCE OF 39.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S0006'41"W A DISTANCE OF 45.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S06'52'26"E A DISTANCE OF 53.08 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S18'48'47"E A DISTANCE OF 62.86 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N8922'44"W A DISTANCE OF 21.57 FEET TO A POINT ON A PROPERTY LINE; THENCE RETURNING ALONG A PROPERTY LINE N 00'37'16"E A DISTANCE 192.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-D. I ' *VII/ 4, •;i.' 'pa e,p (4L(itgPJ)lItI !! It. s er i• ��,� c, DNA L �� EXPIRES: MAY 6, 2001 PAGE 3 CITY Off.'-' RE TON ..LL i Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 8, 1999 Mr.Norman M. Peterson 3402 Park Avenue North Renton,WA 98056-1913 SUBJECT: LAKE TERRACE MOBILE HOME PARK/TAMARON POINTE APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. Peterson: I am in receipt of your letter dated October 20th and appreciate the concerns you expressed therein. In this letter I hope to address the two principal issues you raise, redevelopment of the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park as a multi-family residential project, and dislocation of the residents of the mobile home park. You are correct in your observation that the entire lower portion of the project site, up to the toe of the slope, was cleared of vegetation for the proposed development. However, no land clearing is permitted in the steep hillside area on the east portion of the site. The developer's proposal leaves this area undisturbed. Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park existed in this location for many years. In 1993, all properties it the City of Renton were rezoned to implement the 20-year Comprehensive Plan under the State o' Washington Growth Management Act. As a result of citywide rezoning, about three-quarters c the Lake Terrace site was zoned for mobile homes, and the remainder zoned for multi-family residential development. Subsequently, at the request of the property owners,the City Cour. considered rezoning the entire property to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RMI), consistent with zoning immediately to the south. The RMI Zone permits densities of 10 to 20 units per acre on the site. Several meetings and hearings were held on the rezone request, and the Lake Terrace Homeowners were represented in those hearings. The rezone to Residential Multi-Family—Infill was approved in June 1994. The property owners entered negotiations with private developers to redevelop the site consistent with the RMI Zone. In 1998,Tramell Crow Residential (TCR)applied to the City to re-develop the site with a 182-unit apartment complex,Tamaron Pointe. On August 15, 1998,and in accordance with State Law, a one-year advance notice of proposed site development was given to the residents of the mobile home park. The City conducted environmental review and held public hearings. This included hearing an appeal filed by the Lake Terrace Home Owner's Association. The project was approved earlier this year, and no further appeals were filed. The developer has provided relocation assistance to the residents of the mobile home park. A housing specialist was hired in late 1998 to work with the residents to relocate their mobile homes. I understand that the developer and residents reached an agreement that included a financial settlement for the residents to offset the costs of moving. The City's Community Services Department also provided assistance to residents when needed. 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 i� 1 Development of land is occurring along Lake Washington Boulevard. This is true throughout Renton, as envisioned in the State's Growth Management Act(GMA). The GMA required that cities and counties plan for population growth over a 20-year period. Growth is to concentrate in the cities as a way of preserving forest and agricultural land beyond urban areas. In meeting the mandates of GMA, Renton's City Council adopted new zoning to accommodate a range of housing opportunities including single family homes on smaller lots, and areas of multi-family development, as in the case of the Lake Terrace site. Implementing the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning provides many new opportunities for housing in the City and, as you have noted, can result in the displacement of existing residents. Property owners have the right to propose development consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and zoning regulations, or to sell their land to others. When a private property owner applies to develop or redevelop their land,the City is obligated by law to accept and process those applications. If the development is consistent with adopted plans and codes of the City,then it must be approved. Government cannot intercede in property owners' decisions to sell their land to developers. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the former residents of Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park. I hope this letter explains the decision-making process the City must abide by. Please feel free to contact Jennifer Henning at(425)430-7286 should you wish to discuss this or if you have further concerns. Sincerely, 424773llffli /ge ‘--- Gregg Zimmerman P/B/PW Administrator cc: City Clerk/Referral#99050-C Jesse Tanner,Mayor Renton City Council Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Homing,Principal Planner DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON NOV 12 1999 RECEIVED TCR Robert Hinnen TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL Development Associate Pacific Northwest 2001 S.W.River Drive Portland,OR 97201 (503)952-7739 FAX(503)241-3462 DEVELOPMENT PLAN CITY OF RENTON SEP v <. 1999 RECEIVED August 30, 1999 Ms. Jennifer Henning City of Renton City Hall, 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Removal of Restrictive Covenants and Abandonment of Utility Easements for Tamaron Pointe Apartments Property Dear Jennifer: Per our discussions in June, Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, the current owner of the property formerly used as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park, hereby requests removal of the Declarations of Restrictive Covenants recorded on December 5, 1983 and December 12, 1983, under Recording Nos. 8312050533 and 8312120558 (copies enclosed). The restrictive covenants set forth in these documents (1) have previously been satisfied, (2) are no longer desired by the Department of Public Works (per conversation with Neil Watts) or (3) have been incorporated into the approvals for the project currently under construction. Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership needs confirmation that the restrictive covenants no longer apply. Alternatively, Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership hereby requests that the restrictive covenants be modified to reflect only those that are still in effect, if any. Similarly, under Ordinance No. 3447 of the City of Renton, recorded under Recording Nos. 801006060646 and 8012120762, the City reserved an easement for utility purposes when it vacated a portion of Pelly Place N. Pelly Place N. terminated in the middle of the site currently being developed as an apartment community. There are no public utilities located within the easement area. All existing utilities are being replaced as part of the apartment development. Public utilities serving the apartment community will be in public utility easements as required by the Department of Public Works and/or the applicable utility provider. Copies of the two recordings of the Ordinance are enclosed for your reference. Ms. Jennifer Henning August 30, 1999 Page 2 Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. We very much appreciate your continuing assistance on these matters. Sincerely, p2,t487,a,_ ______ Robert A. Hinnen Development Associate Enclosures cc: John Wayland (w/o enclosures) Mike Ording (w/o enclosures) Greg Diener (w/o enclosures) Bill Rutledge (w/o enclosures) August 20, 1999 Ms. Jennifer Henning DEVELOPMENT PLANNING City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 1055 South Grady Way AUG 2 ` 1999 Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED Re: Tamaron Point -Landscaping Selection Dear Jennifer: As view-property owners located directly above the Tamaron Point building project, we are requesting several changes to the landscaping materials selected by the developers. We currently have a view corridor that spans due west and south. This view borders the north end of the project and fans south, the full length of the development. We are requesting changes to the selection of trees proposed by the developer in order to preserve that view corridor for the future. A majority of the trees selected are rated as reaching a maximum height over their lifetime of 50 feet. However four of the trees listed by the developer under their Evergreen Foundation category and the Parking Lot tree category can reach heights of 150 feet to 350 feet. The specific trees include: --Ulmus Wilsoniana Prospector (Prospector Elm) which can reach a height of 120' --Sequoia Sempervirens (Coast Redwood)which can reach a height of 350' --Pseudotsuga Menziesii (Douglas Fir) maximum height of 250' --Thuja Plicata(Western Red Cedar) maximum height of 200' We ask that the City Planning Department request alternative species be selected to replace these trees. The replacements should be shorter in height so that they will not impede upon uphill property views. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Susan Hopkins and Rich Hopkins 2511 Park Place N Renton, WA 98056 DEVELOPMEN i PLANNIN CITY OF RENTON AUG 2, 1999 REeEIt,FI, 1 Planning Comments: 1, A concrete stair, which climbs up the 30' high bank along Lake Washington Blvd, has been added adjacent to building 15 at the north end of the site, --2, The Site plan has been revised by removing the parking stall at the south end of the site in front of building no, 1, Civil and landscaping plans have been revised also. 3. The landscape drawings have had the tree types revised. 4. Robert Hinnen of Trammell Crow Residential is currently working on the native growth protection easement. This will be provided as soon as it is available. ,5. We have added a note to the site plan sheet A1.01 which requires the substandard townhouse driveway aprons to have "NO PARKING" painted on them. b, Robert Hinnen is having a restrictive covenant drafted to meet this requirement. This will be submitted when It is ready. 7. The landscape drawing have been revised to Include site lighting plans sheets L4,0-L4.4 for review. Under the subject heading of your letter you make the statement "CONSTRUCT NEW 10 UNIT MF- TAMARON POINTE #A(1)", I wanted to be sure this doesn't cause any confusion or problems. Our project includes; 17 apartment buildings containing 6, 8, 10 and 28 units and 1 recreation building. If there are any questions that come up please give me a call so we can get you answers quickly. Sincerely, Rutledge Maul Architects, PS Inc. )714 David B. Maul, AIA Architecture&Planning rma August 3, 1999 DEVELOPMENTan/OF RENTON Ms. Jennifer Henning AUG 0 1999 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055 Re: Tamaron Point—Building Height Issue Dear Jennifer: Based on the hearing examiner's decision on November 23, 1998, we revised our site plan and building plans to reduce the net building height. The specific changes we made to accomplish the height reduction for Building#14 (others are similar) were as follows: 1. Finish floor elevations were lowered 2'to an elevation of 100'. 2. The building was moved to the Southeast 3' ±to an existing base grade that is 6" ±higher, but the building remains at the 100' level, or 2'6"' lower for the calculated height. The site line for the easterly single family residents is also improved by the move to the East. 3. The height from the basement floor to the first floor was reduced 1'—0". ( It was 10' and is now 9'.) 4. The roof pitch was lowered from the Trammell Crow Standard for garden buildings of 6 in 12, to a 5 in 12 pitch. This results in a 2'7" height reduction. These changes collectively add up to a reduction in building height of 6' ±. This complies with the hearing examiner's decision asking for a reduction of the pitched roofs compared to the calculated heights. The smaller townhome buildings were similarly lowered by grading changes, and by changing the standard roof pitch from 8 in 12 to 6 in 12. I believe that the Palmer's understanding was that the grades were to be lowered to accomplish the 6' + reduction in height. They should be made aware that the grading was only part of our solution. They should also understand that approximately 110,000 cubic yards of unsuitable soil is being removed from the site and approximately 60,000 yards will be imported to the site. The net effect is, in fact, a lowering of the grades. The current site work includes stockpiling of material, so this may be adding to the Palmer's misunderstanding. All stockpiled materials will be removed. Current grades and stockpiles do not accurately relate to the final grades. I hope this information has clarified the situation. Should you require further information, please call. Sincerely, Rutledge Maul Architects P.S., Inc. t2i.a; William E. Rutledge, .A. President mr1WER Copies to: Rob Hinnan Bob BeVan John Wayland Greg Diener MR9lge Maul Architects,P.S.Inc. 19336 47th Ave.N.E. Seattle,WA 98155 (206) 440-0330 FAX 362-4381 TAMARON POINTE APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. First Construction Review Development Services Division May 25, 1999 TRANSPORTATION: Construction plans to meet City of Renton Drafting Standards. A construction permit and bonding is required. 2. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. 3. City estimated trip generation is 735 daily new trips. Therefore the estimated fee is as follows: $75 x 735 =$55,125.00 Mitigation fee. See attached calculation sheet. Trip rate above is determined by dwelling units, not acreage or square footage as used in the transportation report prepared by TPE. 4. Off site improvements are curb, gutters and sidewalks required on Lake Washington blvd. N. the full length of the property frontage. This also included sufficient roadway widening to provide for a bike lane. The bike lane needs to be shown. 5. An additional off site improvement, street lighting is required for Lake Washington Blvd. covering the full length of the property frontage. Street lighting to meet City of Renton Standards. Lighting level is 0.6 ft-c minimum and uniformity ratio of 4:1 minimum. Street light drawings missing and also the street light standard details drawings are missing. Standard detail drawings to be shown are as follows: JR-03, page J004 35' Davit Pole JR-05, page J006 Train Relief Detail JR-06, page J007 Typical Lighting Underground System JR-07, Page J008 Concrete Pad Details JR-09A Page J009 St. Light Standard Decal Numbering System JR-12, Page J013 Fuse Kit Splice Kit Details JR-35 Page J014 Light Base and Junction Box Locations JR-36 Page J016 Junction Box Details Control Cabinet New Street Light Control Cabinet with meter Base See attached drawing. 6. All overhead electrical and communication cables abutting to the property frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. under 55-K.V. to be underground in coordination with the Electrical and Commutations City code at the Developers expense. Trenching for these utilities on Lake Washington Blvd. must occur behind the curb. 7. Entrance and roadway grades not to exceed 8%. A variance must be requested for grades above 8%. 99CM049T.DOC\ 8. A gate entrance to have sufficient vehicle storage to prevent backup onto the arterial. The maximum drive way entrance is to be 50-feet per City Standards. 9. Truck hauling to be scheduled during off peak traffic conditions which is between 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM. 99cm0490T 99CM049T.DOC\ April 19, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 133 that if the full impact fee is not charged now, Issaquah will be forced to ask for an even higher charge later,depending on the number of new students and how many new schools will be required. For example,development in the Newcastle Highlands area has been grandfathered with a$1,100 fee while all other new homes in Newcastle will be charged$6,100. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. CAG: 99-038,Emergency City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/12/99 for CAG-99-038, EW-3 Well Well (EW-3)Drilling Project, Drilling project; two bids; engineer's estimate $66,142.83; and submitted staff Holt Drilling recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Holt Drilling, Inc., in the total amount of$52,030.26. Council concur. Annexation: Davis,Union Ave Economic Development,Neighborhoods& Strategic Planning Department NE&NE 26th St recommended a public hearing be set on 5/03/99 for the second and final public hearing on the proposed R-8 zoning for the Davis Annexation area; 3.8 acres located in the vicinity of 132nd Ave. SE(Union Ave. NE) and NE 26th Street. Council concur. Annexation: Smith, Hoquiam Economic Development,Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Department Ave NE& SE 113th St recommended a public hearing be set on 5/03/99 for the Smith Annexation's 60%Petition to Annex and proposed zoning; 12 acres located east of Hoquiam Ave.NE(142nd Ave. SE) and generally between SE 113th and 116th Streets. Council concur. Lease: Sky Harbor Aviation Transportation Division submitted a request from Sky Harbor Aviation that its Lease Assignment to South lease be assigned to South Cove Ventures, a limited liability company(LAG- Cove Ventures, LAG-84-006 84-006). Refer to Transportation(Aviation) Committee. Public Works:Thunder Hills Wastewater Utility Division recommended approval of a contract in the amount Sanitary Sewer Access Road, of$61,918 with Hammond, Collier&Wade —Livingstone Associates, Inc. for Hammond Collier&Wade topographic survey and base mapping on the Thunder Hills sanitary sewer access road repair project. Council concur. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from John Wayland, Trammell Crow Residential, Citizen Comment:Trammell 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.NE, Suite 330, Kirkland, 98033, stating that the Crow Residential—Tamaron company has withdrawn its pending appeal related to the Tamaron Pointe Pointe Apts Appeal Apattnients project at 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. (SA-98-123). (Withdrawal) MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE'S REFERRAL LIST. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Centex Correspondence was read from Eric C. Evans, Centex Homes, 2320 - 130th Homes—Windwood Ave.NE, Suite#200, Bellevue, 98005,requesting creation of a latecomer's Subdivision Latecomer's agreement so adjacent properties will be required to share in the cost of Agreement extending a 24-inch sanitary sewer in SE 128th St., which Centex Homes is installing for the Windwood Subdivision at the requirement of the City. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Edwards presented a report recommending that Finance Committee Council concur in the Administration's recommendation to impose school Finance: Issaquah School impact fees on new single-family residential development in the Renton portion District Impact Fees of the Issaquah School District, and more specifically, that: CRJohn H.W'at l.0 TR.MMEU.CROW RESIDENTIAL Development Ass.,;,, West Coast Group 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland,WA 98033-7866 (425)828-3003 FAX(425)828-0904 CITY OF RENTON APR 1 2 1999 April 7`h, 1999 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City Clerk,City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments (File No. LUA-98-123, SA-H,V-H, SM,ECF) Dear Jennifer: After review of your letter,dated April 2, 1999,regarding acceptance of the site plan,prepared by Rutledge Maul Architects,dated March 15, 1999,Trammell Crow Residential(TCR)will withdraw its pending appeal regarding Site Plan Approval. TCR believes that those conditions for Site Plan Approval noted in that letter will be addressed and reviewed for conformity at building permit review. Thanks you for your help with this matter. Sincerely ayland cc: Jennifer Henning, City of Renton Clyde Holland,TCR Bob BeVan,TCR Doug Daley,TCR Alex Cugini,LTA Gerard Shellan, LTA Steve Harer, LTA John Hendrickson, Foster Pepper F:\TAMAROMHENNING2.W PD • �,; , CIT. OF RENTON NILCity Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn.3.Petersen April 20, 1999 Mr. John Wayland 4010 Lake Washington Boulevard NE Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033-3003 Re: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Site Approval Appeal; File No. SA-98-123 Dear Mr. Wayland: This will confirm receipt of your letter withdrawing the referenced appeal. The letter was entered into the record at the regular Renton City Council meeting of April 19, 1999. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marilyn t rsen City Clerk/ ale Manager cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President King Parker Jana Hanson, Development Services Director Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • •16 T CITY uF RENTON to Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 2, 1999 Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 330 Kirkland,WA 98033 SUBJECT: TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS (FILE NO. LUA-98-123, SA-H, V-H, SM,ECF) Dear Mr.Wayland: We are in receipt of a revised site plan for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments by Rutledge Maul Architects, Sheet A1.01 dated 3/15/99. As we understand it,the site plan has been modified in order to illustrate your efforts to meet conditions of Site Plan Approval as assigned by the Hearing Examiner in the Decision dated November 23, 1998. I have reviewed the March 15, 1999 site plan and the proposed revisions appear to meet conditions of Site Plan Approval except as noted below: • Entry driveways, internal driveway aisles and turning radii have not yet been reviewed by the Fire Department for compliance,per Condition No. 4. • A pedestrian connection from the north end of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard is not shown on the site plan drawing,per Condition No. 6. • A site lighting plan has not been submitted consistent with Condition No. 7. • It is not clear whether Condition No. 10 will be met(see attached conditions). • A revised landscape plan has not been received or reviewed per Condition No. 11. In addition, all intrusions into the special setbacks areas would need to be removed. This applies to the-surface parking stall located on the southeast corner of the site across from Building 1 that intrudes into the setback. • It is not clear whether Condition No. 13 has been met. • Compliance with Condition No. 14 cannot be verified without a revised landscape plan. Generally, the review of a site plan for concurrence with conditions occurs at the construction or building permit stage. Prior to the issuance of construction and building permits, the above- referen&d, and other applicable conditions of-the Shoreline Permit and Environmental Review Committee, will need to be met. We anticipate that as part of the Construction and Building Permit packages, further refinements of the Site Plan will occur. Our preliminary comments are being offered at this time in response to your request. As you know, your requested Parking Modification has been approved by the Department Administrator. That approval was based on an analysis of the revised (3/15/99) site plan. In addition, the City issued a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit on March 10, 1999 and the appeal period for the Shoreline Permit has now ended. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DE V&PLAN.ING\PROJECTSV 8-123.JTH\STPLRV.DOC 1055 South/ Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 OR]This naner cnntainc 50%recycled material.20%most consumer Page 2 April 2, 1999 The only outstanding issue with regard to the Site Plan Approval is the appeal which you have filed. Please inform the City Clerk at your earliest convenience if you intend to pursue the appeal, or withdraw it. The Clerk can be reached at (425)430-6510. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7286. Sincerely, ' IT45re6-4 /OA MC"). Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager enc a - Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 20 provided somewhere in the vicinity of Buildings 3,4, or 5. Th police maintain it is safer for younger children to use play equipment near their residences. 14. The applicant should choose landscape materials that will of grow to harm the view of the upslope .neighbors and that will stabilize any steep slopes. Since he site is in the Aquifer Protection Area,the applicant should probably also pick landscape materia that require limited fertilizers and pesticides for maintenance. 15. The development, particularly if the grade is redu/eed somewhat, should not have an adverse impact on property values. `/ 16. The internal roadway appears to provide for/safe circulation patterns for residents. The width of these roadways and turning radii need to meet Fie Department requirements for their emergency equipment. In addition, since long stretches of the int mal path cross parking stalls,the applicant should provide the second path down to the street from the north portion of the site, along the second driveway. 17. There should be adequate light and a. provided to the site with the way the buildings are arranged. 18. The site is served by City infrastr ture, and as noted,the roads serving the site have adequate levels of service for the new residents. 19. In conclusion,with some adju tments in grade and conditions to reduce light or landscaping impacts and to provide adequate ingr ss and egress,the proposed plan appears to be an appropriate redevelopment of the subje site. DECISION: The Site Plan and Variance are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of building permit; 2. The applicant shall modify the site plan to realign the driveway angle for the northernmost drive to either a 90-degree intersection with Lake Washington Boulevard,or an angle between 45 and 90 degrees that is acceptable to the City's Development Services Division and Transportation Systems Division. Approval of the revised driveway is required prior to the issuance of construction or building permits for the proposal. 3. The applicant shall modify the site plan for the primary ingress/egress drive to provide a minimum 20- foot width in both the traffic aisle and the gate opening area. Revisions to the site plan must be _ submitted to and approved by the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction or building permits for the proposal. 4. The entry driveways, internal driveway aisles and turning radii shall be approved by the Fire Department. 5. The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement for the steep slope areas 40%and greater on the east portion of the site in order to protect the slopes from future disturbance. The Native Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 21 Growth Protection Easement shall be recorded against the title for the property prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian connection from the north end of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. The pedestrian connection shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the proposal. 7. The applicant shall submit a site lighting plan for the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction or building permits. Such plan shall minimize the spill of light up from the site and the applicant shall not "wash" buildings with light. 8. The setback intrusion near the northeast corner of the site shall be rectified. 9. The applicant shall provide a second tot lot in the vicinity of Buildings 3,4 or 5. 10. The applicant shall not disturb any of the steep easterly slopes over about 3 to 4 feet. All slope work shall be done according to City standards and done in consultation with a geotechnical engineer. 11. The applicant shall remove any intrusions into required setbacks and provide appropriate landscaping in those areas. 12. The applicant shall provide carports with roofs along the eastern boundary of the site for all of those spaces now located between the garage in the northeast corner of the site and the two garages in the central eastern boundary. 13. Where buildings would intrude into existing views,the applicant shall regrade the site to reduce the grade by the amount that the pitched roofs are taller than the calculated heights. 14. The applicant shall choose landscape materials that will not grow to harm the view of the upslope neighbors and that will stabilize any steep slopes. Since the site is in the Aquifer Protection Area,the applicant shall install landscape materials that require limited fertilizers and pesticides for maintenance. ORDERED THIS 23rd day of November, 1998. FRED J. KAUF N HEARING EXA INER TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of November, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, PlanBldg/PW Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson, Development Services Director Chuck Duffy, Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling, Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler '4 * r CITY OF RENTON fie Planning/Building/Public Works Department °'' Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor March 26, 1999 Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 330 Kirkland,WA 98033 SUBJECT: TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS REQUEST FOR PARKING MODIFICATION(FILE NO. LUA-98-123, SA-H,V-H, SM,ECF) Dear Mr.Wayland: I have reviewed your request for modification from the City of Renton's Parking and Loading Ordinance for the proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments located at 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. Summary of Request The request is to be permitted to utilize driveway apron parking in order to meet a portion of the required parking for a proposed multi-family residential project. The 182-unit apartment development is required to provide 319 parking spaces. A combination of surface parking stalls, garages, carports, and driveway apron parking is proposed as follows: TYPE OF PARKING STALLS Townhome Apron Parking(87 standard/21 compact) 108 Townhome Garage Parking(1 per unit) 126 Surface Parking (including 34 carport stalls) 129 Free-standing garages (3 structures with 6 stalls each) 12 TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING 375 Stalls The applicant proposes to count 55 of 108 driveway apron stalls toward the 319 parking space requirement. Background The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that multi-family residential developments and apartment houses provide 1.75 parking spaces for each unit(1.5 stalls/unit plus 0.25 guest parking spaces per unit for developments with 5 units or more). The 182-unit Tamaron Pointe Apartments must provide 319 parking spaces (1.75 parking spaces x 182 units= 318.5 parking spaces required). A total of 375 stalls is proposed or 2.06 parking stalls per multi-family residential unit. The 375 parking stalls include: 126 townhome garage stalls, 108 parking spaces on the townhome driveway aprons; surface parking (95 stalls and 34 carport spaces) for 129 vehicles, and 12 spaces in free- standing garages located in close proximity to the two larger(stacked flat) apartment structures (Bldgs. 8 and 14). In addition to the 375 parking spaces, 40 townhouse units would have the H:\DIVISION.S\DE VELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\98-123.JTH\GZPKG.DOC • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Page 2 March 26, 1999 potential for tandem parking within the garage,however the tandem garage space is not included in the parking counts. The applicant has requested to deviate from the Parking and Loading Ordinance by being allowed to count 55 of the 108 driveway aprons toward the parking requirement. In order to be permitted a modification from the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance,the applicant must show that the proposal: 1) conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; and, 2) can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and, 3) will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies)in the vicinity; and, 4) will be made prior to detailed engineering and design. Analysis 1) Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that multi-family developments provide 1.75 off-street parking stalls per unit. With 375 parking stalls, 2.06 parking stalls per unit would be provided,which is an adequate amount of parking to serve residents and guests of the multi-family residential development. Tandem parking is defined in Title IV as: "The parking of one motor vehicle behind another, where one does not have direct access to a parking aisle without the moving of the other vehicle." The Parking and Loading Ordinance states that tandem parking is allowed for single family and two-family dwellings. Tandem parking for multi-family dwellings greater than two units is not addressed. However,through parking modification requests,tandem parking has been permitted to count toward some of the required parking, as in the case of Plum Grove (also known as Sector D of The Orchards development). It appears that the intent of the Parking and Loading Ordinance was to prohibit tandem parking in situations where surface parking lots and carports are the primary means to satisfy the parking requirements for residents and guests. In that case,tandem parking could result in blocking of carport/surface parking spaces or circulation aisles. The Tamaron Pointe townhome residents would have a single garage space for their own use, and the majority of the units (108)would also have sufficient area on the driveway apron to park a vehicle. In addition, 40 of the townhome units would have the potential for tandem parking within the garages. The stacked flat structures would have surface parking,garages and carports adjacent to the buildings to serve the 56 dwellings in those structures. For 18 of the townhome units,there would not be sufficient space for either a compact or standard parking stall. In those instances, staff would recommend that no parking be permitted on the driveway aprons. - 2) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. The applicant would provide approximately 2.06 parking stalls per multi-family residential unit. Parking would consist of garage and carport spaces, apron parking, and surface parking stalls. Garage and carport parking would be for the use of residents. Driveway apron parking in front of a townhome garage would be for the exclusive use of residents of the townhome and their guests. Surface parking stalls would be available to residents of the stacked flat units and any visitors. Page 3 March 26, 1999 The applicant's request assumes that tandem parking on aprons behind the garages is acceptable as satisfying a portion of the parking requirement. If the tandem parking was not counted toward the requirement,then the project would provide 267 of the required 319 parking stalls, or 1.46 stalls per unit. The applicant would then need to develop additional parking on site, or reduce the residential unit count of the project. It is prudent to permit the applicant to utilize driveway apron parking for a portion of the parking requirement. There are no opportunities available for overflow parking along the abutting public street, Lake Washington Boulevard. By allowing the applicant to count the driveway apron spaces toward required parking, off-site areas (such as Coulon Park)would be less likely to be impacted by overflow parking. In recent pre-application meetings, Fire Prevention Bureau has suggested that multi-family developments provide two off-street parking stalls per unit. Furthermore, permitting the applicant to utilize tandem parking would serve to limit additional impervious surface. 3) Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. The granting of the parking modification would reduce the need to construct additional surface parking on the site, and therefore reduce additional impervious surface. Residents and guests would be less likely to park either along Lake Washington Boulevard or at Coulon Park. In addition,there would be sufficient parking to provide approximately two parking stalls per unit and thereby reduce the likelihood that residents or guests would attempt to park off-site. The applicant has revised the site plan as the result of the site plan and variance decisions issued by the Hearing Examiner and subsequent clarification of the decision. The Hearing Examiner's Decision prohibits development of surface parking within special setback areas located along the north and east boundaries of the site. The applicant has modified the site plan to remove parking areas and has shifted site development to the west, consistent with the Examiner's Decision and has avoided impacts to the steep slope areas on the north and east. 4) Will be made prior to detailed engineering and design. The applicant has requested the modification from the Parking and Loading standards prior to finalizing engineering and design plans. The Hearing Examiner's Decision has been issued, and the applicant has revised the site plan to meet all required conditions,but is awaiting a decision regarding the requested parking modification prior to commissioning final engineering plans. Decision The request to count tandem parking on approximately 55 driveway aprons toward the parking requirement for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments (File No. LUA-98-123, SA-H,V-H, SM, ECF) is approved'subjectto the following conditions: 1. No parking shall be permitted on driveway apron parking stalls that are not of a sufficient size to meet City requirements for either a standard or compact parking stall. Sub- standard driveway aprons shall be signed or marked for"No Parking". 2. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant or other device acceptable to the City that assigns tandem parking spaces to the exclusive use of specific dwelling units. The applicant shall also install signs at the garages indicating that the driveway apron is reserved for use by the unit occupant. Page 4 March 26, 1999 3. This approval is predicated upon conformance to the Hearing Examiner requirement that prohibits development of surface parking within special setback areas located along the north and east boundaries of this site. Sincerely, 3/frfrue&fif,Ay,e1 Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department cc: Jana Hanson Jennifer Henning v CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 26, 1999 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning FROM: Gregg Zimmerman G z SUBJECT: Tameron Pointe Apartments Parking and Loading Ordinance Modification Request. Jennifer, I have reviewed your staff report in regard to this request. In my December 3, 1998 memo to you I expressed concerns relating to the tandom parking(on the aprons)and also the existance of parking spaces that require excavation of the steep slopes on the north and northeast boundaries of the project. The Hearing Examiner imposed conditions on the site plan that prohibits development of surface parking within special setback areas located along thenorth and east boundaries of the site. You mention in your staff report that the applicant has modified the site plan to remove parking areas and has shifted site development to the west,thus avoiding impacts to the steep slope areas on the north and east. This site plan change allays many of my concerns relating to approving a Parking and Loading Ordinance Modification request that places some of the parking for this project into areas created be excavating a steep slope at the boundary of the property. This site plan certainly appears to provide sufficient parking so as to avoid unwanted parking on neighboring properties or along Lake Washington Boulevard. I am assuming that the aprons proposed to be counted as parking stalls are sufficiently long(I believe our standards require 20-feet depth for parking stalls). In fact,meeting our parking stall dimension standards is a prerequisite of the granting of this modification request. Your condition appears to cover this. With this said,I am willing to grant this modification request with two added conditions: 2) A restrictive covenant or other device acceptable to the City will be required to assign tandem parking spaces to the exclusive use of specific dwelling units. Signs shall be installed at the garages indicating that the apron is reserved for use by the unit occupant. 3) This approval is predicated upon conformance to the Hearing Examiner requirement that prohibits development of surface parking within special setback areas located alont the north and east boundaries of this site. Please modify your staff report into letter form,add the two above conditions(you may reword them as long as the sense is preserved-I'm writing this in a hurry), attach a copy of the applicant's modification request,and return to me for my signature. Thanks. \\TS_SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\Document2 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership Attention: Douglas L. Daley 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,NE Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033 DOCUMENT TITLE(S): Native Growth Protection Easement GRANTOR(last name,first-name,middle initial): Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership U.S. Bank National Association GRANTEE(last name,first name,middle initial): City of Renton LEGAL DESCRIPTION(abbreviated: lot,block,plat or section,township,range): Portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining Lots 39,40 and 41 of Eldon Acres,as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,records of King County,Washington,together with portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street adjoining Portion of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 5,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M. Portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the NW 1/4 of Section 5,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,as situate within the Plat of Eldon Acres as per Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,pages 86A and 86B,records of King County,Washington Additional legal description begins on page: 5 ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL OR ACCOUNT NUMBER: 229650-0200-06 REFERENCE NUMBER(S)OF DOCUMENTS ASSIGNED OR RELEASED: Document No. NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT For value received, Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership ("Grantor"), hereby grants to the City of Renton ("Grantee")a perpetual easement(the "Native Growth Protection Easement") over the area described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Easement Area") for the purpose of preserving natural vegetation for the control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, visual and aural buffering, and protection of plant material and animal habitat. The Easement Area includes the steep slope area within its confines. The creation of the Native Growth Protection Easement conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the Easement Area. The Native Growth Protection Easement imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement Area an obligation,enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Renton,to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the Easement Area. The vegetation within the Native Growth Protection Easement may not be cut,pruned,covered by fill, removed or damaged without express written permission from the City of Renton. The Native Growth Protection Easement shall run with the land and shall be binding on all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement Area. TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, its general partner By: TCR Pacific Northwest VII,Inc., a Texas corporation, its general partner By: uglas L. Da y, Vice President 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON § • COUNTY OF KING § On October/p, 1999,before me appeared Douglas L. Daley, to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say that he is the President of TCR Pacific Northwest VII, Inc. a Texas corporation,which is the sole general partner of TCR#544 Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership,which is the sole general partner of Tamaron Pointe Limited Partnership,a Texas limited partnership, and that the said document was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation (acting in the capacity indicated)by authority of its board of directors, and he acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of said corporation(acting in such capacity) and the partnership acting as general partner(in its capacity as such) and the partnership that executed said instrument. In witness whereof,I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. [SEAL] ._- -.OP CO I+ ��/ � f = otary Public Commission expires:; '�tst� 1), '' ''''!� III I CFWO: C-e7frt Print Name of Notary Public 3 U.S. Bank National Association ("Bank"), hereby subordinates to this Declaration of Restrictions and the interests and rights created hereby the Deed of Trust, Including Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases, and Fixture Financing Statement, dated June 24, 1999, from Grantor for the benefit of Bank, which has been recorded as Document No. Merl 04,21 00►S5$- in the Real Property Records of King County, Washington. U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Name: i/-/-0,N.fs T. .4f heT/v ..t Title: t'' P.eEsia�✓T STATE OF (A)/13f1(/‘.)(0 r(xi § § COUNTY OF /N G- § On October a_cl, 1999, before me appeared 1 ff Oii�1���5 J AR rN s eh— to me personally known, who being duly sworn did say that(�9'she is the (J c 5 n sriv'Pk U.S. Bank National Association, and that the foregoing document was signed in behalf of said association by authority of its board of directors, and he/she acknowledged said document to be the free act and deed of s id association. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal t e a and year last written above. [SEAL] ublic'PotsNOT - `n PUBLIC Commission Commission expires: It 9 02 sKid-7 /0t_ Alt e�7 ozsC I Print Name of Notary Public 4 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY_ PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY OF THOSE COMMON BOUNDARY ONES AS ESTABLISHED IN THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT FILED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8509110605; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2: LOTS 39, 40 AND 41 OF ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 41 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1020457; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26, ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS. PAGE 86. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE WEST 172 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH UNE OF TRACT 27, ELDON ACRES, WITH THE WEST UNE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 5, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY (200 FEET IN WIDTH) OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4: THAT PORTION OF A CITY OF RENTON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., HAVING A WIDTH OF 50 FEET KNOWN AS PELLY PLACE NORTH (FORMERLY 102ND PLACE SOUTHEAST) AS SITUATED WITHIN THE PLAT OF ELDON ACRES AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGES 86A AND 86B, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 28 AND SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 16'57'45" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 433.98 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAID PLAT; PAGE 5 NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE NORTH 88'37'15" WEST A DISTANCE OF 52.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ORDINANCE NO. 1824; THENCE NORTH 16'67'45" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 405.81 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 39; THENCE NORTH 59'59'06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8711230876; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SAID PORTION IS A NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS _. _ FOLLOWS: _ EASEMENT 1 COMMENCING POINT AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-A FOR EASEMENT 1 COINCIDES AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY UNE S59'59' 07"W A DISTANCE OF 25.66 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S46'56'16"W A DISTANCE OF 109.17 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N72'58'18"E A DISTANCE OF 123.04 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE N16'57'44"W A DISTANCE OF 53.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-A. EASEMENT 2 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N73'02'16"E A DISTANCE OF 5.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-B; THENCE S16'59'15"E A DISTANCE OF 71.64 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S28'54'36"E A DISTANCE OF 96.32 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ALONG THE PROPERTY UNE N16'57'44"W FEET A DISTANCE OF 165.87 TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 19.97 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-B. EASEMENT COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY UNE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 189.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 42.36 FEET TO A TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING - C; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 131.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 111.95 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N88'48'21"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 816.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7'51'29" TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 4,24 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N73'57'03"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1532.66 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0'09'31" TO A POINT; THENCE FOLLOWING THE PROPERTY LINE N8818'44"W A DISTANCE OF 57.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOO'37'16"W FEET A DISTANCE 474.48 TO A POINT; PAGE 6 • NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR TAMARON POINTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE N2326'45"W A DISTANCE OF 41.11 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N13'06'30"W A DISTANCE OF 48.78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N11'08'57"W A DISTANCE OF 56.05 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NO3'05'53"W A DISTANCE OF 85.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N09'28'14"W A DISTANCE OF 63.06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NO2'50'58"W A DISTANCE OF 124.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RETURNING N10'S0'46"W A DISTANCE OF 179.63 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-C. EASEMENT 4 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE S16'57' 44"E A DISTANCE OF 238.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S73'02'16"W A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S16'57'44"E A DISTANCE OF 189.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 174.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 111.95 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N88'48'21"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 816.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7'51'29" TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 4,24 FEET, ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N73'57'03"E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1532.66 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF O'09'31" TO A POINT; THENCE S88'37'14"E A DISTANCE OF 57.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S00'37'16"E A DISTANCE OF 497.32 FEET TO A TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-D; THENCE S89'22'44"E A DISTANCE OF 31.51 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S28'13'39"W A DISTANCE OF 39.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S00'06'41"W A DISTANCE OF 45.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S06'52'26"E A DISTANCE OF 53.08 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S18'48'47"E A DISTANCE OF 62.86 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N89'22'44"W A DISTANCE OF 21.57 FEET TO A POINT ON A PROPERTY UNE; THENCE RETURNING ALONG A PROPERTY UNE N 0037'16"E A DISTANCE 192.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING-D. gli, 4' i, Iii 4:-, . qi fist . 0. ,p 18612 p 1Ff FCISTECE" \`'' CZ/ONA L -.*G„t EXPIRES: MAY 6, 2001 PAGE 7 STATE C,,��i�• Litt 9 �.t..� •.tt to �itEiuV '":.� J�i'ii• .::� 1889 a(y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 March 22, 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON John Wayland MAR 2 4 1999 Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE Suite 330 RECEIVED Kirkland WA 98033 Dear Mr. Wayland: Re: City of Renton Permit#LUA-98-123SM TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL- Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit# 1999-NW-10021 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to construct a complex of seventeen 3-story apartment buildings, totalling 182 units, a recreation center, and 372 parking spaces, involving removal of a trailer park and grading of 40,000 cubic yards,has been filed with this office by the City of Renton on March 11, 1999. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21-day appeal period, April 01, 1999. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, Alice Kelly, Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program AMK:amk SDP.DOC cc: Jana Huerter, City of Renton 03/16/99 10:08 FAX 425 828 0904 TCR KIRKLAND Z 002 TC '' TKL�4MCii.CROWAr�IL Niue Wesr Coact Group 4010 Lake Washingum Blvd„N.E. DVELOPMENT p�NNING Suite 330 CITY OF PLiN Kirkland,WA 98033-7866 (42=)S2S-3003 FAX(425)828-O9U' AR 16 1999 RECEIVED March 16, 1999 Ms. Jennifer Henning Project Manager City of Redmond 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments- Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision Project No.LUA-98-123 Dear Jennifer: Trammell Crow Residential (TCR) requests to postpone the appeal to the Hearing Examiner's decision, which is to be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee on March 18, 1999. TCR has made significant changes to the site plan to accommodate the conditions of the Hearing Examiner and feels that there is a likely chance that all site plan issues can be resolved, pending approval for a Parking Modification. This requested delay, pending resolution of the Parking Modification, should in no way forfeit TCR's right to continue the appeal that was submitted by TCR on December 28, 1998 and supplemented with a letter dated January 22, 1999 by TCR's land use attorney,John Hendrickson of Foster Peper& Shefelman,PLLC. Sincerely, oh Wayland cc. John Hendrickson Clyde Holland Bob BeVan Lake Terrace Associates F\TAMARONWENNINGI,WPD ..................... CITY(yF REN7QN RE NIN DIVI i N C R NT PLAN .;AFFIDAVIT OF SERII'tC��Y MAILING On the IC)Its day of tY& , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing S1ncxel\v\e Peinrn� documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing .art. of EL_o.L_ j PtitYvILL 3o1nv1 1�cu('le.�$ -Ca.v-vnuvrell Cmui (Signature of Sender) SS- -t<<-- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 4v /4 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act ecir the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 41 c Notary Public, and for 6m he State of ington c Notary (Print) MARILYN My appointment e6Q : 11 a Project Name:i0.iII\CL.VtVA Po tv` I . Project Number: LOR • `Is lz3 SIB-Ai v ,Srn NOTARY.DOC , . o '—'") CIT1 3F RENTON ._ I - Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 10, 1999 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for File No. LUA-98-123; SA-H, V-H, SM, ECF Dear Shoreline Permit Coordinator: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on March 10, 1997. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at (425) 430-7286 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely,C \ T€(3* I_. \.ii . \(:t4 (I. sr6din er Toth Henning Project Manager Enclosures: Copy of Original Application Affidavit of Public Notice/Publication Site Plan SEPA Determination cc: Office of Attorney General City of Renton, Transportation Systems City of Renton, Utility Systems Applicant SHLTR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer e CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-98-123, SA-H, V-H, SM, ECF DATE RECEIVED: August 7, 1998 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: August 21, 1998; Revised September 14, 1998 DATE APPROVED: March 9, 1999 DATE DENIED: Not Applicable TYPE OF ACTION(S): [X] Substantial Development Permit [ ] Conditional Use Permit [ ] Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit: This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033 PROJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. Approximately 40,000 cubic yards of grading (cut/fill) would occur on site as a result of project construction. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, Variance from Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance in order to clear and grade steep slope areas adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard North, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" SHSBDV.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Tamaron Pointe Apartments Page 2 of 3 SEC-TWNP-R: Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Lake Washington APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 5.04 Urban Environment page 25 6.02 Environmental Effects page 26 7.14 Residential Development page 40 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall install and maintain appropriate erosion control measures, prior to the commencement, and throughout the duration of clearing, grading and construction activity. The erosion and sedimentation control measures are subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, and must be approved prior to the issuance of the construction permit. 2. The contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site. 3. In the event that sediment from the project site is transported to Lake Washington during development of the project, immediate steps will be taken to correct the deficiency in the erosion control facilities so as to eliminate the flow of sediments into the lake. Serious or repeated incidents of sediment flow into the lake from this project could lead to recision of the Shoreline Permit, in accordance with Code Section 4-9-190N. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. a JAIfWi t , Planning/B it in ublic orks Administrator Date SHSBDV.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Tamaron Pointe Apartments Page 3 of 3 THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: APPROVED: DENIED: If Conditional Use, Section of the City's Shoreline Master Program authorizing the use: If Variance, Section(s) of the City's Shoreline Master Program being varied: This Conditional UseNariance permit is approved/denied by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: Date Signature of Authorized Department Official cc: Attorney General's Office City of Renton, Plan Review(Neil Watts) City of Renton, Surface Water Utility (Ron Straka) Applicant SHSBDV.DOC rA[uui 6.Renton Reporter•March 4,1999 ''� - Mobile Home park residents will ` -= soon know about their future • MNC �'""" • S By ELIZABETH PARKER the standards (state statutes) Many people have been y - News Editor then they have a chance at working to help the residents of • - buying the property." the park, including some state jr. + e : Residents of the Lake Ter- "I really can't talk about the legislators. A rally also took ir'r• T"E ---w1 `., + race Mobile Home Park have specifics of this right now," place in Olympia in mid-Feb- been working especially hard Tran added. ruary on the steps of the Capitol �' " . _' over the past few months to find However,Lake Terrace resi- that brought together people " a way to keep their homes— dent Sondra Craft said the group concerned about the fate of mo- ! �t" -"•r^ - and many believe they may has pulled together a down pay- bile home parks in the state. • ' '� `�= '�"'� have found a way. ment for the property for es- Those advocates for the Y - Residents of the 92-pad park, crow,and they have found some parks told lawmakers that it is ...- % aa located on Lake Washington other sources to help pay for the expensive to move the homes "' Boulevard North in Kennydale, cost of the park such as loans even if they can find spaces for DAVID NELSON/Renton Reporter were told last Augustthat they and grants. them—which is becoming in- had a year to relocatea their mo- It will cost each pad about creasingly difficult and expen- Rooster tails like these at last year's first Renton Cup will bile homes because an apart- $60,000 to buy the property,it is sive. The experience is very be visible once again this year, as the second annual meat complex is planned for the estimated,and then there will be stressful, and many of those Renton Cup takes place In early April.This year the race site more costs to fix the aging living in mobile homes are el- will host the Western Divisionals. They've been fighting to buy sewer system there and other derly people on fixed incomes. the property ever since. maintenance costs. One of the Lake Terrace park The efforts to purchase the "We're trying not to think residents chose to move her Hydro races are back park for about$5.6 million,are about that(the other costs)right home to another park near getting closer to culmination, now,' said Ishbel Dickens, a Renton and it cost her nearly The Renton Cup hydroplane dream,organizers said. and"it will flesh itself out in low-income housing advocate $10,000 and nearly her life, races are back again this year, All of the proceeds benefit about a week or so."said John who is helping the residents. Dickens said. Food Bank, and Wayland,an attorney for Tram- The residents are attempting Ramona Richardson.72,said and organizers promise more ac- the Renton an men Crow,the commercial real to purchase the property through the stress of the move and living. lion than last year,where more more than 25,000 people are ex- estate company planning to de- a 1993 state law called the without heat because she than 18,000 people came to the petted to come to Gene Coulon velop the property into 182 "Right of First Refusal."which couldn't afford it,caused her to very first Renton Cup. Park the weekend of April 24 apartments allows people like the residents acquire pneumonia.For several This year the event will host 25,from 1l a.m.to 6 p.m.each Wayland said he didn't want at Lake Terrace to purchase mo- weeks,said she could only af- the Western Divisionals, with day. to elaborate on just what is bile home park property that is ford to eat one meal a day— blown alcohol drag boats,lim- The event organizers are going to happen,and neither did in danger of being developed. cottage cheese. ited class hydros, more flat- looking for sponsors and volun- the,kake Terrace Mobile Home The law has many require- Rep.Velma Veloria,who rep- bottom runabouts and more Leers for the races.For those in- Park Homeowner's Association meats and restrictions, in- resents portions of Renton,said outboard performance craft. terested,call Al Lapointe,one of attorney Hong Tran of the cluding time frames that must legislators are working on a bill Another added bonus is a the co-chairs of the event.His Northwest Justice Project. be followed to assure that prop- currently to help provide more custom Rod and Car Show,and number is (425) 226-1586, or "It's a sensitive situation erty owners also are treated money to the state's Housing a display of personal watercraft his web site at www.securi- right now," Waylandd, ffarlly and get fair rt market value Tprust Fund such for people lleato o buy - for people to sit, touch and tyrace.com. adding that"if they property.4)�� "Bowling is When you can hear die race park. Another bill is pending that would help make it 'i easier for non-profit,associa- tions to'buj� irtiiitty for'ten- (}�a��1 j \j�-a For Everyone!" its a am Drops an� ''� `unshine in your ear, BankRepos•255-4582 2809 N.E.Sunset Boulevard lt. ,/ 97 Honda LX 4-Door Loaded i (425)226-1600 � ' ` �.;, No Contracts to assume ! ____ • If you,your parents, / , just need a reliable party • r CoupoN , benefitor grandparents could ''I• •�.�• 1 Call agent-Elite Brokers 0 0 o from a hewing u ' aid we encourage you FUN-DER Bowling to call us for a free AN.+.'7/ t Construction Friday-Saturday consultationand y Junction E%P.Any4-4 Ot "<' ,4 ,hearing test.• •1? NmVeld With A"ram^••on., COUPON A A —1 , We are dedicated to Quality Is Our Function ryylonlS1 7 98' , helping people just like SINCE Licensed-Bonded-insured �•Al\J IJCt �/V you enjoy the sounds 1958 *Remodeling Games of Bowlingj'' that make their life •Decks&Fences Sunday 9am-12pm [o so worth�liwaing� SOUND ASSOCIATES,INC. Home ReGeneral EXP.4-4-99 BEa IA//le. 255 SW 41st Street•Renton,WA 98055 p L Nan va d wu^.�onw n n J OPEN Call Today (206)246 7050 Can Now For FreeEstimate Check out our web site:www.bowl et Iialuesf.tan EVERYDAY --__. ___ 425-23Free 09h O s all busipe S'h S, Italian. 14i J 0 go throes �� m S Tr ;1 P ey a�°'9 say °^ sr Inspired. lei (�11 i y °o s* '' j c 3 P� 5elle's 0 a d° a1stoU�llte A�'3 0 0• ° •At U.S.Bank,your small business doesn't get thec runaround,just the credit• �tit� s �o � USBankVisa'BusinessCard.Nofinancialsorcollatrral •Pasta r Were shortened our stttall busitess credit process m %.make it easier for you to get the credit you need. ny �4, are required,so you can complete the form in about •Pizza to go ' • C �. lO mnyotakead„antagedadrerdfen nsmall • •fine wine No opening or Now,by filling out ai simple O'A 4y hness predumandservices.(OffersendAprd16,1999)For •Micro brews I i annual fees. U B 'Advantage Line and a �cess bee complete details,stop by U.S.Bank,or call 1-888-746-2870. 271-70 A 2 t, Litt 212 S.3rd C bank. i ;jy"u� Downtown Your needs.Our tools' iJ ��tt Renton Simply Business' ui " n .b ..•.aa.d.o.c...N.sea..a.�,...r.+rd,...,era...s...v,u. �........s.....,.,"•.�..>.m..,.......,md.a u s-. '"*.,..e..,w.dee.'"*" ww..w ...r.av,o..a...1:1 nrsr..o•.us..+war.+uss.i.�wt...sarw 7.Z...nmus..a•...ioc ,....,s., """`0.b'* se...�r~ w®se�ir:�w.,.nw.��o�.�r"se....+u..e.r......ursw.ri.o.ar.�er..auswa..+wu..0 4$Z"."),+_,, CITY F RENTON t�tL • City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen CL-14- C/Cp'�f ENT PLAN, 0�I` ,tvG February 24, 1999 • FEB 2 i999 Mr. Gary Palmer 2507 Park Place North �c��r/� Renton,Washington 98056 Re: Appeal by John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential of Hearing Examiner's Decision on Tamaron Pointe Apartments Site Plan and Variance; SA-98-123 Dear Mr. Palmer: At the regular Council meeting on February 22, 1999,the Renton City Council referred your letter, dated February 16, 1999, and the appeal filed by John Wayland regarding the Tamaron Pointe Apartment development to the Council's Planning and Development Committee for review and recommendation. Consideration of the appeal by the Council shall be based solely on the record, the hearing examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional written submissions by parties allowed by the City Code. The time and date of the meeting is 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 18, 1999 in the 7th floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building, 1055 S. Grady Way,Renton 98055. If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marilyn . rsen City Clerk cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President King Parker Jennifer Henning,Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer February 22, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 59 * The apparent low bid for the Cedar River Flood Control Project,Phase Two (flood walls and levees)is more than$400,000 below the Army Corps of Engineer's estimate. Work is scheduled to begin on March 15th. * Renton's Youth Council was awarded a$500 grant from the King County Department of Public Health's Tobacco Prevention Program for a mural (design and location to be determined). * The Renton Community Marketing Campaign launched radio ads last week featuring informative"Did You Know"facts that capture the energy of the community and put a positive face on Renton. AUDIENCE COMMENT Marjorie Richter, 300 Meadow Ave.N., Renton, 98055, spoke against allowing Citizen Comment: Richter— gambling uses near residential areas. Saying these should be kept a mile away Zoning of Gambling Uses from churches, schools and parks as well, she agreed with the City's past action to restrict new gambling uses to Renton's industrial/warehouse area located south of I-405 and west of SR-167. Citizen Comment: Franklin— Bev Franklin, 537 Williams Ave.N., Renton, 98055, agreed that gambling uses Zoning of Gambling Uses; should not be located near homes, schools or churches but instead be confined Bryn Mawr Sewer Project to the Valley area. On another subject,Ms. Franklin reported ongoing problems with King County's Bryn Mawr sewer project at N. 6th St. and Burnett Ave.North, which has subjected nearby residents to excessive noise, traffic and construction work. In particular,work performed on the night of January 23rd was not only done without a valid variance,but was the cause of irreparable damage to one of her antique figurines. Citizen Comment: Beckley— Phillip Beckley, 655 Ferndale Ct.NE,Renton,98056, supported the Mayor's Taxation on Gambling proposal to tax gambling establishments at the 20%maximum rate. Revenues Citizen Comment: Schumsky Don Schumsky, 2019 Jones Ave.NE.,Renton, 98056,the owner of —Zoning of Gambling Uses Schumsky's All-City Diner at 423 Airport Way, complained that although he has millions of dollars invested in his business and is not interested in relocating it, the City outlawed new gambling establishments anywhere outside of the Valley area. Mr. Schumsky claimed that gambling uses are very different from adult entertainment uses, and do not warrant being restricted via zoning regulations. He felt it was unfair that even though two gambling establishments already operate in the vicinity of downtown Renton,he is prohibited from operating the same type of business in his current location. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Appeal: Tamaron Pointe City Clerk submitted appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Apartments,2100 Lk Wash Tamaron Pointe Apartments site plan and variance, located at 2100 Lake Blvd N(SA-98-123) Washington Blvd.N. (SA-98-123); appeal filed by John Wayland,representing Trammell Crow Residential,on 12/28/98. Refer to Planning&Development Committee. CRT: 99-003,Washington Air ' Court Case filed on behalf of Washington Air Reps v. Renton et al., alleging Reps v Renton, et al. that Northwest GM Contractors,a subcontractor on the City Hall remodel project, owes $6,175 (plus interest and attorney fees) for work completed last summer but never paid for. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. CRT: 99-004, Robert Marshall Court Case filed on behalf of Robert Marshall, 2909 Mountain View Ave.N., v Renton Renton, alleging negligence,trespass, and violation of due process rights in connection with actions taken by the City on 11/27/95 to remove vehicles from his property. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. CI1 r OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: •p1 . SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 2/22/99 Dept/DivBoard....City Clerk Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Public Hearing Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Tameron Correspondence... Pointe Apartments Site Plan and Variance,located at 2100 Ordinance Lake Washington Blvd. Resolution File No. SA-98-123 Old Business EXHIBITS: New Business A. City Clerk's letter Study Session B. Appeal(12/28/98)&Appeal Supplement(1/25/98) Other C. Request for Reconsideration&Response(12/7/98) D. Request for Reconsideration&Response(12/28/98) D. Hearing Examiner's Report&Decision(11/23/98) RECOMMENDED ACTION: I APPROVALS: Refer to Planning and Development Committee on March I Legal Dept 18, 1999. I Finance Dept Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Expenditure Required Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated SUMMARY OF ACTION: Two separate requests for reconsideration were received and responded to by the Hearing Examiner. The appeal was filed by John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential,accompanied by required fee received on 12/28/98. February 22, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 60 EDNSP: 1999&2000 Annual Economic Development,Neighborhoods& Strategic Planning Department Consultant Rosters for recommended approval of annual consultant rosters(short list and reserve list) Environmental Services for professional environmental consulting services in 1999 and 2000. Council concur. Finance: Human Resources Finance&Information Services Department reported plans to use Eden Module of Payroll System, Systems, Inc. for the human resources module of the payroll system. Refer to Eden Systems Finance Committee. Finance: Debt Information Finance&Information Services Department submitted a debt manual illustrating types of debt,purposes of debt,and information on debt limits. Refer to Finance Committee. Solid Waste: 1999 Business Solid Waste Utility Division recommended approval of an agreement with Recycling Program& Special King County accepting $31,560 in grant funding for the 1999 Business Recycling Event,King County Recycling Program and a Special Recycling Event. Refer to Utilities Committee. Solid Waste: Waste Reduction Solid Waste Utility Division recommended accepting$61,953 in grant funding Education Program, Grant from the Washington State Department of Ecology for solid and hazardous from DOE waste reduction education programs. The City's cost share is$41,302. Refer to Utilities Committee. Solid Waste: Local Hazardous Solid Waste Utility Division recommended approval of an agreement accepting Waste Mgmt Plan, Seattle- $25,808 in grant funding from the Seattle-King County Department of Public King County Health for programs relating to the Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Refer to Utilities Committee. Vacation: Oakesdale Ave SW Technical Services Division requested approval of the appraisal submitted for Appraisal (IBID Corp,VAC- the Oakesdale Ave. SW street vacation(IBID Corp.,VAC-98-003), and 98-003) recommended that Council set the required compensation at one-half the appraised value,or$35,000. Council concur. Airport: Pro-Flight Aviation Transportation Division recommended approval of a new lease with Pro-Flight Lease Aviation, Inc., for a parcel to be transferred from Lane Aviation (LAG-85-013). Refer to Transportation (Aviation)Committee. Public Works: Windsor Hills Wastewater Utility Division requested approval of a contract in the amount of Sewer Replacement Survey $65,000 with Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc., for Work, Penhallegon Associates topograhic survey and base mapping work associated with the Windsor Hills sewer system replacement. Council concur. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Nate Larson,4300 NE Sunset Blvd.,Renton, Citizen Comment: Larson— 98056, supporting the Mayor's proposal to tax gambling establishments at the Gambling Establishments& 20%maximum rate. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- Tax Rates WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE FINANCE COMMIIEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Lee— Correspondence was read from Suzanne Lee, 3300 NE 6th Pl.,Renton,98056, Animal Restrictions asking that City Code be changed to permit keeping four to eight animals on lots 35,000 square feet or less. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Palmer— Correspondence was read from Gary Palmer,2507 Park Pl.N.,Renton,98056, Tamaron Point Apaitnients, regarding several aspects of the Tamaron Point Apartments project. MOVED 2100 Lk Wash Blvd BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER February 22, 1999 Renton City Council Minutes Page 61 THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Edwards presented a report recommending approval Finance Committee of Claim Vouchers 167573 - 168091,and two wire transfers totaling Finance: Vouchers $3,820,565.03; and Payroll Vouchers 164724- 164966 and 527 direct deposits in the total amount of$1,503,995.87. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Chair Edwards presented a report recommending approval of Payroll Vouchers 164967 - 16521 land 524 direct deposits in the total amount of$1,299,705.36. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning&Development Planning&Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Committee relating to land use gambling. After a presentation by staff,and public Planning: Gambling Land Use comment,the Committee recommended that Council concur with the Restrictions Administration and retain the City's existing Code provisions which restrict the location of new card rooms to the area south of I-405 and west of SR-167. The Committee further recommended that if the State pre-empts local zoning authority regarding the locations of card rooms (or mini-casinos),the Council should revisit this issue for possible prohibition of"gambling activities" as provided for in RCW 9.46.295. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler referred to a letter sent to the City by Ed Fleisher,Deputy Directory of Policy and Government Affairs for the Washington State Gambling Commission. Mr. Fleisher claimed that Renton's authority to allow gambling uses in one area but not in others is not clear. In response to the City's request that the Commission not approve pending applications by Diamond Lil's and Schumsky's All City Diner to offer house- banked games, Mr.Fleisher said that the Commission is prohibited from". . . deny(ing)a license to an otherwise qualified applicant in an effort to limit the number of licenses to be issued." Councilman Edwards suggested that the City consider the possibility of an "overlay"district for gambling,which would allow these uses in a limited fashion in areas other than the Valley. For example,he did not consider the frontage along Rainier Avenue to be part of Renton's historic downtown area which it is trying to preserve and revitalize. Adding that gambling activities are already easily accessible via the Internet,he said these types of uses are not detrimental to the surrounding community in the same manner as adult entertainment uses,but rather are fairly wholesome. He favored retaining this issue in committee to pursue development of an overlay district. Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler replied that the subject at hand involves significant land use issues separate from the question of whether gambling is good or bad. She expected, for example,that one criteria of whether a gambling use would be allowed would be the proposed location's proximity to single family homes, since high volume parking can quickly become a concern. Councilman Corman commented that although mini-casinos are not mentioned in Renton's adopted Downtown Plan, one nevertheless exists there because the State unilaterally legalized certain gambling activities that previously had not February 8, 1999 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 8th day of February, 1999, at the hour of 5:00 p.m your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by John Wayland, representative for Trammell Crow Residential (File No. SA-98-123). Marilyn J. P rsen, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 8th day of February, 1999. `AtIrf\V\ACht‘4(1e0V0i Brenda Fritsvold Notary Public in and for t e State of Washington, residing in % ® CITY OF RENTON Office of the CityClerk (., #�' I _____ -�'4 la �. r 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 , FEB 0 :1'9 z 0 .3 a 5 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED w I40-4s ;4'"••la•s7A1 _ ;# 02 09 99C1:M PRESORTED SEA 1,tci 981 OP RENTON FEB 2 2 i 1999 Greg Diener C/7 Y C ECCIti�E 130 Andover Park E, #300 `ERK'S���C� Seattle, WA 98188 DIEN13O 981882004 1N 19 02/16/99411 RETURN TO SENDER `J I NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD ��:�`( " I • N RETURN TO SENDER DEL - I"_::___ N s �d' ) -311sy�/7,141,'x li+l��t��l,lli���l�l��l�l,��{I�I 1�1dulil���ll���l�l��ll���l�lil�l�il�lill�i�l r CITX OF RENTON selL City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen February 4, 1999 APPEAL FILED BY: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on the Tamaron Pointe Apartments Site Plan and Variance, located at 2100 Lake Washington Blvd., File No. SA-98-123 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding Trammell Crow Residential's request for site plan and variance has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee at 4:00 p.m. on March 18, 1999, in the 7th floor Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, 98055. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marl . tersen, CMC City Clerk Attachment 1055 South Grady Way - Renton,� Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 al This nanar contains co.:,rarvrlari malarial I mar City of Renton Municipal Loae; Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110 - Appeals 4-8-110C3 Any appeal shall be filed in writing. The written notice of appeal shall fully,clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. (Ord.4353, 6-1-92) 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170, the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110E8 Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk,within fourteen(14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council-Procedures: 1. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five(5)days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 2. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, fmdings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25- 93) 5. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 6. Findings and Conclusions Required: If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F1 and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the preceding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 7. Council Action: If,upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 8. Decision Documentation: In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving,modifying or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless appealed within the time frames under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) +4254307300 RENTON DEV SVCS/PLAN 556 P02 DEC 22 '98 16:52 APPEAL HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RE'N3O 2 C 9COUNCII. FILE NO. LUA-9B- L23 , SA-H , SM , V DE. APPLICATION NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments RECEIVED The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner,dated November 23 1998 .&letter of clarification 1. IDENITFICATIONOFPARTY dated 12- 15-98 APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE(IF ANY): Name: Trammell Crow Residential Name: John Wayland Address: 4010 Lake Washington Blvd . NE Address: 4010 Lake Washington Blvd . NE Kirkland . WA 98033 Kirkland , WA 98033 Telephone No. (4 2 5 ) 8 2 8-3 0 0 3 Telephone No. (4 2 5) 7 3 9-7 6 5 5 2. $PECIFJCATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets,if necessary) • Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. Error: • See, reverse, side, Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction: OTHER: - No. Error: • Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following:relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: x Modify the decision or recommendation - allows: Remand to the Examiner • further co•• • 'on as follows: Other * 217-5/1 A.•eli• •t/Representative Signature. Date NO •least refer to Title IV,Chapter 8,of the Renton Municipal Code,and Section 4.8-16,for specific procedures. heappeal.doc ATTACHMENT TO APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION File No. LUA-98-123,SA-H, SM, V TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: Modify the decision as follows: Decision No. 8 and 11: The first items requested to be modified deal with the setback intrusions noted in Conditions No. 8 and 11. City Code Section 4-31-8:D.7.b states that if the Rill lot abuts a lot zoned RC, R-1, R- 5, R-8 or R-10, a 25-foot side or rear yard setback shall be required along the abutting sides of property. Properties zoned R-1 abut the site to the north, and property zoned R-8 abuts a portion of the site on the east. According to the definitions section of the zoning code, setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line. The site plan shows a 25-foot setback from the property line. One corner of a proposed garage intrudes into the setback at the northeast corner, and this intrusion can be rectified. No other buildings intrude into the setback area. Parking and driving aisles are located in the setback area. Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant, requests that City Council modify Conditions 8 and 11 to allow parking and drive isles in the setback area of the proposed site plan. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: Modify the decision as follows: Decision No. 12: Decision No 12 conditions the parking stalls along the east side of the property to be covered as carports. This condition creates a conflict with the modification requested in Conditions No. 8 and 11. If parking were to be allowed in the setback area, code requirements do not allow any structures to be built in setback area. If covered parking in the setback area is to be allowed, a variance would need to be granted. Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant, requests the City Council to either reverse Decision No. 12 or grant a variance to allow covered parking in the setback area. FOSTE PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW CM7Yt eki E/tt'� Direct Phone (425) 646-3711 Direct Fars.',,,!, (206) 749-2102 January 22, 1999 E-Mail hendj@foster con VIA FACSIMILE CITY OF RENTON AND U.S. MAIL JAN 2 5 1999 FEC=:V :D City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton C/o City Clerk 7 1055 South Grady Way M E a i Renton, WA 98055 Suite BELLE'. Wash:.:: Re: Tamaron Pointe Apartments 98004 LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, V Telep! Dear :Council Members (4=s '; , Faes:•,: This letter is submitted in behalf of Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant u ebs . with regard to the above referenced site plan review application (the"Applicant"). a w,t This letter is a supplement to the appeal previously submitted for the Applicant by John Wayland on December 28, 199S (the "Appeal"). The Appeal pertains to the November 23, 1998 decision of the Hearing Examiner with respect to the application. In addition to the issues raised by Mr. Wayland in the Appeal, the Applicant respectfully requests the Council to review an additional condition imposed by the Hearing Examiner in a letter dated January 14, 1998 to Jennifer Henning of the AN"' Alask.r Development Services Division. That letter endeavored to clarify issues raised by Ms. Henning in a December 28, 1998 memorandum to the Examiner. A copy of the BELLE: Examiner's letter and Ms. Henning's memorandum is enclosed for your convenience. Wash PORTI , The additional condition imposed in the Examiner's letter provides in Oreg.,, pertinent part: SEATS No parking shall be permitted in any of the special setback areas defined by Wa°`• code. 21003217 o1 • January 22,.1999 Page 2 As a result of the foregoing prohibition, the Tamaron Pointe Apartments will lose 20 parking spaces that were associated with Building 14 on the Site Plan. Building 14 would consequently be left with an undesirable number of parking spaces in close proximity to it, causing a significant hardship for the future residents of that building, as much of the remaining parking spaces would otherwise be more distant from that building. The Applicant requests that the above referenced condition be deleted and substituted with a finding by the Council that the proposed 20 parking spaces may be located in the special setback area as is permitted by Section 4-31-8(D)(10), Renton Municipal Code. No variance is necessary to allow surface parking in a special setback area is it may be permitted as part of the site plan review process. The subject approval condition should be deleted for the reason that the Examiner's letter does not identify any adverse affect to be caused by the parking in this area that would justify such an extreme mitigating condition as this outright prohibition of use of this area, other than for landscaping. The Examiner's letter does not cite evidence in the record upon which this condition is based. This is understandable because there was no testimony or other evidence admitted into the record of potential impacts of parking in this area. Requiring landscaping, rather than parking in this area, as is indicated by the Examiner's letter, would serve no real purpose. Adjacent to the east of this area of the site is a steep slope hillside upon which there is no development. The steep slope conditions will prevent development of this adjoining area in the future as well. Thus, the landscaping area required by the Examiner will abut upon undeveloped hillside, providing no meaningful aesthetic benefit while eliminating convenient parking for residents of the site. Moreover, no adverse impact of the proposed parking has been identified and thus there is no foundation for the "mitigating" condition prohibiting the subject parking. The Examiner's letter only speculates that unspecified adverse affect could occur "if not now, at some possible future time", but does not identify what that affect may be nor identify the evidence in the record which supports this concern. A special setback area typically serves the purpose of buffering less intense development from that which may be more intense. That condition does not exist in this situation as a steep hillside abuts the east property line of the subject property at this location. As it is an undevelopable area, it cannot become less intensive development that might justify buffering. As a consequence, the underlying reason for a special setback area is not present in this situation, fully justifying the location of 20 surface parking spaces as has been proposed by the Applicant. No objection has been referenced by the Development Services Department nor any other party of record. There has been no call for a buffer in this area and none is warranted as the adjoining steep sloped area provides an effective buffer to single family residential development further to the east. Based upon the factual errors and legal deficiency of supporting evidence, the Applicant urges the Council to reverse the Examiner's decision in pertinent part and modify it consistent 2104)S'_17 01 January 22, 1999 Page 3 with the Appeal , as supplemented by this letter. Thank you for considering the Applicant's concerns regarding the subject approval conditions. ery ruly ours A:cci Jo L. Hendrickson Encls. cc: John Wayland Jennifer Henning Zannetta Fontes 21003217 01 CITY OF RENTON f :-_ 4 -�, r © Office of the City Clerk *_. _� _ FEB0 ::0 . ' E 0 .305 5So IA Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 %05 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED C,/2 wA 7t:k4<,L� .I.S P08TASE : O,c F 02 09 99 FCM PRESORTED SEA WA 981 FFs? ON � �ph,---- c/Ty�9rc�. ?�99 R�SFo Mark Jacobs 0,,cc 2101 112th Ave N #'F. 00 Bellevue, WA ! JAC0101 980042028 1N 20 02/13/9 411 9 RETURN TO SENDER �� tBLE `-- NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD J'f 8 ��i 4D ' RETURN TO SENDER N iiii°` RW!RD f s G -i cl 'lerl,� ' ;ENDER a p� exra:1!S/7g•t42. ll�l��l�il,tt���sl�t��l�l���ll,{ Iil�i��l�1�,.11,��1�l��il���l�l�l�li�l�i,li���l DES J 310 �b1 •� r CITX OF RENTON City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 2 1999 RECEIVED February 4, 1999 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE APPEAL FILED BY: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on the Tamaron Pointe Apartments Site Plan and Variance, located at 2100 Lake Washington Blvd., File No. SA-98-123 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding Trammell Crow Residential's request for site plan and variance has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will_be.reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee at 4:00 p.m. on March 18, 1999, in the 7th floor Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, 98055. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Marily . terser, CMC City.Clerk Attachment 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 / FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer City of Renton Municipal Code; Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110 - Appeals 4-8-110C3 Any appeal shall be filed in writing. The written notice of appeal shall fully,clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s)in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-92) 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170, the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110E8 Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council -Procedures: 1. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five(5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 2. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10)days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25- 93) 5. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 6. Findings and Conclusions Required: If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F1 and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the preceding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 7. Council Action: If,upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration,or enter its own decision upon the application. 8. Decision Documentation: In any event,the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving,modifying or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless appealed within the time frames under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) +4254307300 RENTON DEV SVCS/PLAN 556 P02 DEC 22 '98 16:58 APPEAL HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENjO 2 CITYCOUNCIL. FILE NO. LUA-9$- 123 , SA-H , SM , V DE APPLICATION NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments RECEIVED ^ITY CLERK'S OFELI;__ The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner,dated November 23 1998 .&letter of clarification 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY dated 1 2- 1 5-9 8 APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE(IF ANY): Name: Trammell Crow Residential Name: John Wayland Address: 4010 Lake Washington Blvd . NE Address: 4010 Lake Washington Blvd . NE Kirkland , WA 98033 Kirkland , WA 98033 Telephone No. (425) 828-3003 Telephone No.J425) 739-7655 2. $PECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets.if necessary Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. Error: • See- reverse, SICK Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction_ OTHER No. Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation,if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: x Modify the decision or recommendation . allows: Remand to the Examiner • further co•- • 'on as follows: Other amok. Iz� `1 A..ell• .t/Representative Signature. Date NO 'lease rcfcr to Title IV,Chapter 8,of the Renton Municipal Code,and Secticr 4-8-16,for specific procedures, heappeal.doc ATTACHMENT TO APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION File No. LUA-98-123,SA-H, SM, V TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: Modify the decision as follows: Decision No. 8 and 11: The first items requested to be modified deal with the setback intrusions noted in Conditions No. 8 and 11. City Code Section 4-31-8:D.7.b states that if the Riv1 lot abuts a lot zoned RC, R-1, R- 5, R-8 or R-10, a 25-foot side or rear yard setback shall be required along the abutting sides of property. Properties zoned R-1 abut the site to the north, and property zoned R-8 abuts a portion of the site on the east. According to the definitions section of the zoning code, setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line. The site plan shows a 25-foot setback from the property line. One corner of a proposed garage intrudes into the setback at the northeast corner, and this intrusion can be rectified. No other buildings intrude into the setback area. Parking and driving aisles are located in the setback area. Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant, requests that City Council modify Conditions 8 and 11 to allow parking and drive isles in the setback area of the proposed site plan. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: Modify the decision as follows: Decision No. 12: Decision No 12 conditions the parking stalls along the east side of the property to be covered as carports. This condition creates a conflict with the modification requested in Conditions No. 8 and 11. If parking were to be allowed in the setback area, code requirements do not allow any structures to be built in setback area. If covered parking in the setback area is to be allowed, a variance would need to be granted. Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant, requests the City Council to either reverse Decision No. 12 or grant a variance to allow covered parking in the setback area. FOSTE _. PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW GY?Leti'eNT— Direct Phone (425) 646-3711 Direct Facs•milr (206) 749-2102 January 22, 1999 E-Mail hendjgitostet ium VIA FACSIMILE CITY OF RENTON AND U.S. MAIL JAN 2 5 1999 RECE- ED City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton C/o City Clerk 777 , 1055 South Grady Way AYE. F . 1 Renton, WA 98055 Suite t ; BELLE% II Wash:.:; Re: Tamaron Pointe Apartments 98OO4. : , LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, V Telepl•. • Dear :Council Members (4.5'4 Facsin: This letter is submitted in behalf of Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant a e bs t s with regard to the above referenced site plan review application(the"Applicant"). This letter is a supplement to the appeal previously submitted for the Applicant by John Wayland on December 28, 1998 (the "Appeal"). The Appeal pertains to the November 23, 1998 decision of the Hearing Examiner with respect to the application. In addition to the issues raised by Mr. Wayland in the Appeal, the Applicant respectfully requests the Council to review an additional condition imposed by the Hearing Examiner in a letter dated January 14, 1998 to Jennifer Henning of the A "' Alas4.r Development Services Division. That letter endeavored to clarify issues raised by Ms. Henning in a December 28, 1998 memorandum to the Examiner. A copy of the BELLE,' Examiner's letter and Ms. Henning's memorandum is enclosed for your convenience. Wash/ P o R r I.k The additional condition imposed in the Examiner's letter provides in pertinent part: SEArTI No parking shall be permitted in any of the special setback areas defined by Was'':- code. 21003217 01 January 22,'1999 Page 2 As a result of the foregoing prohibition, the Tamaron Pointe Apartments will lose 20 parking spaces that were associated with Building 14 on the Site Plan. Building 14 would consequently be left with an undesirable number of parking spaces in close proximity to it, causing a significant hardship for the future residents of that building, as much of the remaining parking spaces would otherwise be more distant from that building. The Applicant requests that the above referenced condition be deleted and substituted with a finding by the Council that the proposed 20 parking spaces may be located in the special setback area as is permitted by Section 4-31-8(D)(10), Renton Municipal Code. No variance is necessary to allow surface parking in a special setback area is it may be permitted as part of the site plan review process. The subject approval condition should be deleted for the reason that the Examiner's letter does not identify any adverse affect to be caused by the parking in this area that would justify such an extreme mitigating condition as this outright prohibition of use of this area, other than for landscaping. The Examiner's letter does not cite evidence in the record upon which this condition is based. This is understandable because there was no testimony or other evidence admitted into the record of potential impacts of parking in this area. Requiring landscaping, rather than parking in this area, as is indicated by the Examiner's letter, would serve no real purpose. Adjacent to the east of this area of the site is a steep slope hillside upon which there is no development. The steep slope conditions will prevent development of this adjoining area in the future as well. Thus, the landscaping area required by the Examiner will abut upon undeveloped hillside, providing no meaningful aesthetic benefit while eliminating convenient parking for residents of the site. Moreover, no adverse impact of the proposed parking has been identified and thus there is no foundation for the "mitigating" condition prohibiting the subject parking. The Examiner's letter only speculates that unspecified adverse affect could occur "if not now, at some possible future time", but does not identify what that affect may be nor identify the evidence in the record which supports this concern. A special setback area typically serves the purpose of buffering less intense development from that which may be more intense. That condition does not exist in this situation as a steep hillside abuts the east property line of the subject property at this location. As it is an undevelopable area, it cannot become less intensive development that might justify buffering. As a consequence, the underlying reason for a special setback area is not present in this situation, fully justifying the location of 20 surface parking spaces as has been proposed by the Applicant. No objection has been referenced by the Development Services Department nor any other party of record. There has been no call for a buffer in this area and none is warranted as the adjoining steep sloped area provides an effective buffer to single family residential development further to the east. Based upon the factual errors and legal deficiency of supporting evidence, the Applicant urges the Council to reverse the Examiner's decision in pertinent part and modify it consistent 2100321701 January 22, 1999 Page 3 with the Appeal , as supplemented by this letter. Thank you for considering the Applicant's concerns regarding the subject approval conditions. ery ruly ours r h" Jo L. Hendrickson Encls. cc: John Wayland Jennifer Henning Zannetta Fontes 21003217 01 ••` `.`` CITY _IF RENTON „ ram,. = %), Mayor Jesse Tanner • January 29, 1999 Roger Haynes, President Lake Terrace Home Owner's Association 2100 Lake Washington Blvd.#62 Renton,WA 98056 SUBJECT: LAKE TERRACE MOBILE HOME PARK Dear Mr. Haynes: Although I am unable to attend your homeowner's association meeting on Tuesday, February 2"d, I would like to forward some pertinent information that may be helpful. I recently met with Bob Arbios, Community Builder, from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. We discussed your situation and he advised that there is an existing HUD program with grant money available for "cooperatives" (mobile home parks qualify). Attached you will find his business card. I urge you to contact him to learn more about this program. Sincerely, Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: Jay Covington Dennis Conte Jana Huerter Jennifer Henning 99021 mp U.S. Department of Housing Onp and Urban Development I Olitl hud BOB ARBIOS Community Builder 901055 South GradyWayRenton, Washingtoisuite a 200venue (206)220-5104,ext.3536 - Fax(206)220-5108 ai Thisnannrrnntainc50%re Seattle,WA 98104-1000 Robert_Arbios@hud.gov • FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC ATTORNEYS A T LAW DEVELOPMENT PLANNING �{) CITY OF RENTON JAN 2 5 1999 RECEIVED Direct Phone (425) 646-3731 Direct Facsimile (206) 749-2102 January 22, 1999 E-Mail hendj( foster.com VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL City Council City of Renton C/o City Clerk --- t.ssrEt 1055 South Grady Way AVENUE N.F. Renton, WA 98055 Suite tic.: BELLEVU E Washtngton Re: Tamaron Pointe Apartments K o o t t 9 4•; LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM,V Telephone Dear :Council Members '4-5.4` - 0 0 Faestmtle ti- This letter is submitted in behalf of Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant Ir e h s t t e with regard to the above referenced site plan review application (the "Applicant"). 1t w.< ,r E R.t_ This letter is a supplement to the appeal previously submitted for the Applicant by John Wayland on December 28, 1998 (the "Appeal"). The Appeal pertains to the November 23, 1998 decision of the Hearing Examiner with respect to the application. In addition to the issues raised by Mr. Wayland in the Appeal, the Applicant respectfully requests the Council to review an additional condition imposed by the Hearing Examiner in a letter dated January 14, 1998 to Jennifer Henning of the Development Services Division. That letter endeavored to clarify issues raised by Ms. Henning in a December 28, 1998 memorandum to the Examiner. A copy of the RIIIEVLF Examiner's letter and Ms. Henning's memorandum is enclosed for your convenience. ruRTL1.n The additional condition imposed in the Examiner's letter provides in Ore pertinent part: SEArtLE No parking shall be permitted in any of the special setback areas defined by " "``"""' code. 2100321701 January 22, 1999 Page 2 As a result of the foregoing prohibition, the Tamaron Pointe Apartments will lose 20 parking spaces that were associated with Building 14 on the Site Plan. Building 14 would consequently be left with an undesirable number of parking spaces in close proximity to it, causing a significant hardship for the future residents of that building, as much of the remaining parking spaces would otherwise be more distant from that building. The Applicant requests that the above referenced condition be deleted and substituted with a finding by the Council that the proposed 20 parking spaces may be located in the special setback area as is permitted by Section 4-31-8(D)(10), Renton Municipal Code. No variance is necessary to allow surface parking in a special setback area is it may be permitted as part of the site plan review process. The subject approval condition should be deleted for the reason that the Examiner's letter does not identify any adverse affect to be caused by the parking in this area that would justify such an extreme mitigating condition as this outright prohibition of use of this area, other than for landscaping. The Examiner's letter does not cite evidence in the record upon which this condition is based. This is understandable because there was no testimony or other evidence admitted into the record of potential impacts of parking in this area. Requiring landscaping, rather than parking in this area, as is indicated by the Examiner's letter, would serve no real purpose. Adjacent to the east of this area of the site is a steep slope hillside upon which there is no development. The steep slope conditions will prevent development of this adjoining area in the future as well. Thus, the landscaping area required by the Examiner will abut upon undeveloped hillside, providing no meaningful aesthetic benefit while eliminating convenient parking for residents of the site. Moreover, no adverse impact of the proposed parking has been identified and thus there is no foundation for the "mitigating" condition prohibiting the subject parking. The Examiner's letter only speculates that unspecified adverse affect could occur"if not now, at some possible future time", but does not identify what that affect may be nor identify the evidence in the record which supports this concern. A special setback area typically serves the purpose of buffering less intense development from that which may be more intense. That condition does not exist in this situation as a steep hillside abuts the east property line of the subject property at this location. As it is an undevelopable area, it cannot become less intensive development that might justify buffering. As a consequence, the underlying reason for a special setback area is not present in this situation, fully justifying the location of 20 surface parking spaces as has been proposed by the Applicant. No objection has been referenced by the Development Services Department nor any other party of record. There has been no call for a buffer in this area and none is warranted as the adjoining steep sloped area provides an effective buffer to single family residential development further to the east. Based upon the factual errors and legal deficiency of supporting evidence, the Applicant urges the Council to reverse the Examiner's decision in pertinent part and modify it consistent 21003217.01 January 22, 1999 Page 3 with the Appeal , as supplemented by this letter. Thank you for considering the Applicant's concerns regarding the subject approval conditions. Very ly ours cyJoL. Hendrickson Encls. cc: John Wayland Jennifer Henning Zannetta Fontes 2100321701 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON JAN 2 5 1999 PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM RECEIVED DATE: January 22, 1999 TO: Jana Huerter Jennifer Toth Henning Mickie Flanagan FROM: Gregg Zimmerman 6- e SUBJECT: Tameron Pointe Apartments Parking Code Modification Jana and Jennifer, early in December 1998 I considered a parking code modification request regarding the Tameron Pointe Apartments,and responded with the attached December 3 memo. At that time I requested clarification about the counting of the tandem parking stalls toward the ordinance requirement,and expressed concern about the requested additional spaces creating the need to excavate a potentially unstable hillside. I did not approve the modification request at that time,pending clarification. I have recently received the attached correspondence regarding clarification on conditions established by the Hearing Examiner on the site plan approval. A couple of the Hearing Examiner conditions require removal intrusions into property setbacks. It is apparent that this project is moving forward without a parking and loading ordinance modification. I would feel more comfortable about this if I had a response to my stated concerns regarding counting of the tandem parking stalls,and excavation of hillsides to provide additional parking. Please provide some clarification on this project. Thanks. cc: \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\Document3 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning FROM: Gregg Zimmerman G g SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Parking Code Modification Request Jennifer,I am confused by one aspect of this modification request. On page 2, item 2),you state that"the applicant's request assumes that tandem parking on aprons behind the garages is acceptable as satisfying a portion of the parking requirement. If the tandem parking was not counted toward the requirement,then the project would be providing only 259 of the required 319 parking stalls." It is not clear to me whether consideration of these tandem spaces as parking stalls is part of the modification request. Does the Code allow counting these tandem spaces as parking stalls or not? If the Code does not allow counting these spaces as parking stalls,then this needs to be included in the modification request,and I will need more information in order to reach a decision. As I understand the request,the applicant proposes to provide 372 stalls that are allowable to be counted pursuant to the Code. The requested modification is to allow construction of 53.5 parking spaces over the permitted 318.5 parking spaces. While construction of additional spaces seems prudent considering the lack of available street parking,I am concerned that some of the proposed parking would require cutting into the slope along the northeast property line and installation of a rockery. In the first place,I am concerned about the use of an 8-foot tall rockery as a retaining wall for an existing slope. This concern is compounded by the history of unstable slopes along this stretch of Lake Washington Blvd.and the adjacent properties. I am unwilling to approve a modification that would create extra parking stalls requiring excavation into potentially unstable slopes along the property lines. I believe such construction could create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. In summary, I am not willing to approve extra parking stalls that require excavation into slopes along the property lines,and I require more information about the tandem parking issues before I can make a determination. Thanks. cc: \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMOMDocument3 CGG L/ l/1ePj4 A(j 6 CITY .�F RENTON salL Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J,Kaufman January 14, 1999 Ms.Jennifer Henning Development Services Division 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for Clarification- Tamaron Pointe Apartments File No. LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V Dear Ms. Henning: I have reviewed your request for clarification and am aware that the applicant has filed an appeal of this issue to the City Council. As noted in the original decision,this site presents some unusual aspects which again give rise to the law of unintended consequences. The Code permits parking and circulation in the special setback by the discretion of the reviewing official as long as the parking is surface parking. Uncovered parking, unbuffered and unscreened,therefore may be permitted in the special setback adjacent to the single family zone; but covered parking,which would screen out the noises of engines starting and revving and door and trunks slamming, would apparently need a variance. The topography in this case visually would protect the single family homes from carport-like structures which are 8 to 10 feet tall, if that. In addition,the carports would provide protection from noise for the neighbors up the slope. What is curious is it appears that if the subject site were zoned CS (Center Suburban), this office would be permitted to alter the setback under appropriate circumstances. The Code appears to allow a commercial use to be located closer to single family uses than it allows multiple family to be located in juxtaposition to single family uses. These provisions may be modified by the Hearing Examiner where the applicant can show that the same or better results will occur because of creative design solutions,unique aspects or use, etc.,that cannot be fully anticipated at this time. (Section 4-31-10.2 (D) (7)) Since the applicant did not apply for a variance,this office has no jurisdiction to review one at this time. It would seem that the proposed parking would adversely affect the upslope single family properties, if not now, at some possible future time. The special setback is intended to buffer and separate differing intensity uses from one another. So allowing even surface parking which cannot be enclosed or, at least, roofed in the special setbacks seems inappropriate. Therefore, since it appears that carports cannot be allowed without a variance and the parking and noises associated with a parking lot for an apartment building are much greater in intensity 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 atThis nanar rnnlainc Sf1/.rervrled malarial 20%nost consumer o - December 23, 1998 Page 2 Staff would respectfully request that the conditions be clarified. Code will not let staff permit structures within the special setback, however,the Examiner has the authority to permit surface parking and circulation aisles. This memo is written in haste, in order to bring the matter to your attention prior to the end of the appeal period. I will be away from the office on December 28 and December 29, but welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you further upon my return. Thank you for your consideration. cc: Jana Hum-ter t �y CITY F RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J. Kaufman January 14, 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JAN 14 1999 Ms. Jennifer Henning Development Services Division RECEIVED 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for Clarification-Tamaron Pointe Apartments File No. LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V Dear Ms. Henning: I have reviewed your request for clarification and am aware that the applicant has filed an appeal of this issue to the City Council. As noted in the original decision,this site presents some unusual aspects which again give rise to the law of unintended consequences. The Code permits parking and circulation in the special setback by the discretion of the reviewing official as long as the parking is surface parking. Uncovered parking, unbuffered and unscreened,therefore may be permitted in the special setback adjacent to the single family zone; but covered parking, which would screen out the noises of engines starting and revving and door and trunks slamming, would apparently need a variance. The topography in this case visually would protect the single family homes from carport-like structures which are 8 to 10 feet tall, if that. In addition,the carports would provide protection from noise for the neighbors up the slope. What is curious is it appears that if the subject site were zoned CS (Center Suburban), this office would be permitted to alter the setback under appropriate circumstances. The Code appears to allow a commercial use to be located closer to single family uses than it allows multiple family to be located in juxtaposition to single family uses. These provisions may be modified by the Hearing Examiner where the applicant can show that the same or better results will occur because of creative design solutions, unique aspects or use, etc.,that cannot be fully anticipated at this time. (Section 4-31-10.2 (D) (7)) Since the applicant did not apply for a variance,this office has no jurisdiction to review one at this time. It would seem that the proposed parking would adversely affect the upslope single family properties, if not now, at some possible future time. The special setback is intended to buffer and separate differing intensity uses from one another. So allowing even surface parking which cannot be enclosed or, at least, roofed in the special setbacks seems inappropriate. Therefore, since it appears that carports cannot be allowed without a variance and the parking and noises associated with a parking lot for an apartment building are much greater in intensity 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Ms. Henning January 14, 1999 Page 2 than that normally associated with single family uses, locating open parking stalls in this area is inappropriate. Therefore,the plans shall be altered and no parking permitted in the special setback areas which shall instead be landscaped as required by code. The complex even with this potential loss of parking has adequate parking to meet code requirements. The decision is altered to include an additional condition which shall be: No parking shall be permitted in any of the special setback areas defined by code. The applicant may modestly shift the development footprints as necessary to accommodate the parking outside of the setback zone or may reduce the number of parking stalls or may reduce the scale or size or number of units in the adjacent, affected buildings. If any of the parties believe that this determination is not appropriate and since it affects both the applicant and neighboring properties, all parties may seek further reconsideration or appeal this decision to the City Council. If this office can provide any additional assistance,please feel free to write. Sincerely, ‘,4--(tYr`44- Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson,Econ.Dev. Administrator South County Journal Parties of Record AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Lori L. Furnish first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Municipal Code. newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS LU A98-123,SA-H,S M,V,EC F prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language The applicant has applied to develop a continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County 182-unit multi-family residential develop- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the ment on 10.69 acres.The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, State of Washington for King County. variance, and a shoreline substantial The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County development permit. Location: 2100 Lake Journal not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Washington of the North. (andPp 9 Y Appeals the environmental determina- during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a tion must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required Tamaron Pointe Apts. $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South on: 10/5/98 Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to as publishedthe Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $60.10 Additional information regarding the appeal Legal Number 5238 ._ process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular Q meeting in the Council Chambers on the -C ) J,i seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Legal Clerk, South County Journal Grady Way, Renton, WA on October 27, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan approval and Variance. If the Environmen- ( /�► I ?\,C.---t---- tal Determination is appealed, the appeal Subscribed and sworn before me on this I -1 viay of , 19C' will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. �i1s s P 11/ Publication Date:October 5, 1998 o,%% rr��i Published in the South'County Journal ``vo���N..G.....Fei, October 5,1998.5238 • s .;��sstotr�;•. .,� Notary Public of the State of Washington . . y ,nilr,, ''`•. v-): residing in Renton _ _ = King County, Washington :.•; ,,: ''iIl/llllltl11O" „ry CITI , DF RENTON .� City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen February 24, 1999 Mr. Gary Palmer 2507 Park Place North Renton,Washington 98056 Re: Appeal by John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential of Hearing Examiner's Decision on Tamaron Pointe Apartments Site Plan and Variance; SA-98-123 Dear Mr. Palmer: At the regular Council meeting on February 22, 1999, the Renton City Council referred your letter, dated February 16, 1999, and the appeal filed by John Wayland regarding the Tamaron Pointe Apartment development to the Council's Planning and Development Committee for review and recommendation. Consideration of the appeal by the Council shall be based solely on the record, the hearing examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional written submissions by parties allowed by the City Code. The time and date of the meeting is 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 18, 1999 in the 7th floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton 98055. If I can provide additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, I° Marilyn if.' '0-rsen City Clerk cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President King Parker Jennifer Henning, Development Services Division 6,' -'�5/0#P ez_. a-,„2,q7 II ' 7P NN a- a ( E I. a) Gary Palmer CITY OF RENTON 2507 Park Place North FEB 1 8 1999 Renton Washington 98056 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE February 16, 1999 To: Renton City Council, & Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: Appeal by John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential of Hearing Examiner's decision on Tamaron Pointe Apartments The appeal filed by Mr. Wyland complains about losing 20 parking spaces because there is no evidence admitted into the record of the potential impacts of the parking in this area. I will refer you to my letter dated October 26, 1998 where I stated my concern about having parking on the east side of the building in the first place. I am greatly concerned about the increased noise level which we will have to endure because of these 20 parking spaces utilized by a much more transient population. It remains my opinion that the building should be relocated further east and the parking should be located on the west side of the building. This may also assist in reducing the obstructive nature to our view. I also take issue with Mr. Wayland's assessment as the to development-ability of the adjacent property to the east. By what authority dose Mr. Wyland make this comment? It is perhaps to give the illusion that we are not cognizant of the drastic effect their oversized building#14 will have on the value of our investment. We have every intention of developing that property some day and believe it can be done with an adequate retention system. This brings further concern in that in order for the grossly oversized building#14, which if is going to be constructed as I understand the hearing examiners response, will require grading the property in my estimation approximately 10 ft in order not to obstruct the views of the existing residence above. This additional grading will result in slope which is not only is steep but deep. This in my opinion should require a retention system to keep the hillside from slipping. This is particularly true if the City of Renton continues to neglect it's responsibility to properly handle the surface water run off which exists. now. Currently all the surface water from the streets above flow out of the catch basin and steams over the hillside at an enormous rate during heavy rains on an already over- saturated hillside. If this situation is not rectified nor a retaining wall built or both, this whole hillside will someday end up where they think their parking stalls should be. Sincer- ifdlp Gary Palmer Attachment Gary Palmer 2507 Park Place North Renton Washington Eton 98056 October 26, 1998 To: Office of Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Tamaron Pointe Dear Mr. Kaufman As residence and taxpayers of view properties, we are very much concerned with the development of the apartment complex and Tamaron Pointe. Following are some concerns: Building 14 exceeds height limitations and is in direct line of sight of our view. This building also obstructs our view from the lot we own directly below our residence which we also own and are paying taxes on as view property. Hill side profile is steeper that indicated, may require a retention system. Given the questionable accuracy of this information and the no less than four corner markers indicating one corner of our lot, serious questions arise regarding placement and height of all structures and their impact on view. Parking is located on our side of the building as will result in unacceptable noise levels. Increased density of property will increase noise pollution by a factor of at least six, given the number of units and the younger and more transient nature of the tenants. Parking should be located on the west side of the building. Lighting should be shaded to prevent unwanted light pollution and glare from lights themselves. Landscaping plan indicates the planting of Douglas Fir. These trees can grow to a height of 200 feet and more and in time will totally obstruct our view. These plantings are totally unacceptable. Plans do not call for a fence between the two properties. Given the age factor and transient nature of rental tenants, we can expect our property to be trespassed and privacy violated without some system to retain tenants. We are not unreasonable people and have known that this sort of project may happen. We are concerned with the size of the buildings and their location, particularly when they are placed in a position where they are most likely to offend. We are and have been paying taxes for view property and take any threat to that very seriously. It is unlikel that our taxes will go down as a result of this project. Than you r taking o r concerns into consideration. Gary&Marcie Palmer ""' +MO" SA 2507 Park Pl.N. C` L E 1L �rce #; a 27 Renton,WA 98056 Cn PM „t a iiii*,= .' co II 15 FES �- N``■ �333 -- -- 4 c/c c-;" Gl /6 Ss v-et--1/1/dy Ilk R-evi len., 1A) 4 723655 ...0v.„-4 32. IIrir,i.dims„ai,I,,I,r::,n,„a,t+,nra,I,r,i:I:,r,j,,rn,i OM Roger Haynes 'I gl Bill Barlow John Wayland 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#62 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#91 4010 Lk Wash. Blvd N#330 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Kirkland, WA 98033 Zanetta Fontes John Hendrickson Jennifer Henning 1055 S Grady Way 777 108th Avenue NE, #1500 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 98055 Mona Vaught Richard Hopkins Grace Stiller 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#67 2511 Park PIN 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#80 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Richard Galvin Richard Wagner Mark Jacobs 2407 Garden Court N 2411 Garden Court N 2101 112th Ave NE#100 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Bellevue, WA 98004 Marc McGinnis Greg Diener Ishbel Dickens 13256 NE 20th, #16 130 Andover Park E, #300 1021 NE 70th Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98115 Phil Rutledge Gary Palmer Neil Watts 19336 47th Avenue NE 2507 Park Place N 1055 S Grady Way Seattle, WA 98155 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 David Sager Eric & Cindy Korn Shirley and Odell Milliren 1025 N 28th Place 1211 N 28th Place 1020 N 28th Place Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Manfred and Anne Hansen Dean H. Schellert Barbara Smith 1221 N 26th Street 1013 N 28th Place 1308 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 LaVerne and Mary Jo Graves Patrick McDonald Song Qiao 905 N 28th Place 160 Vashon Place NE 1412 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98056 Sondra Kraft Kim and Theo Brown Charles Jensen 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#68 1003 N 28th Place 2621 Meadow Place N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Tina and Jerry Cullers Dean & Cynthia Schumacher Donald & Patricia Rosburg 2506 Meadow Avenue N 1116 N 28th Place 1402 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Robert and Esther Miller Steve and Julie Wasson Barry Oman 1121 N 28th Place 2515 Park Place N 2500 Lk Wash. Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 James Scott M. L. Gibson Marlene Mandt 1405 N 28th 1215 N 28th Place 1408 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Glyn Gardner Bill & Madeline Arrigoni Nancy Stark 2100 Lk Wash Blvd N #84 907 N 34th Street Mark Mykel Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 1409 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Mike Kattermann Planning Commission (9) Economic Development via Judy Wright City of Renton Sue Carlson Gregg Zimmerman Economic Development Public Works Administration City of Renton City of Renton Chuck Duffy Larry Meckling Fire Prevention Development Services City of Renton City of Renton City Attorney Sandra Meyer Transportation City of Renton Lys Hornsby Utilities City of Renton 4; CIT' OF RENTON •LL 4 ' City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen February 4, 1999 APPEAL FILED BY: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on the Tamaron Pointe Apartments Site Plan and Variance, located at 2100 Lake Washington Blvd., File No. SA-98-123 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding Trammell Crow Residential's request for site plan and variance has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee at 4:00 p.m. on March 18, 1999, in the 7th floor Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, 98055. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner, no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Maril . tersen, CMC City Clerk Attachment 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ' City of Renton Municipal Code., Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110 - Appeals 4-8-110C3 Any appeal shall be filed in writing. The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s)in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. (Ord. 4353, 6-1-92) 4-8-110C4 The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with RMC 4-1-170,the fee schedule of the City. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110E8 Unless an ordinance providing for review of decision of the Examiner requires review thereof by the Superior Court, any interested party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk,within fourteen(14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-8-110F: Appeals to City Council-Procedures: 1. Notice to Parties of Record: Within five(5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal,the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. 2. Opportunity to Provide Comments: Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten(10)days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record to Council: Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4. Council Review Procedures: No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required,the Council shall remand the matter to the Examiner for reconsideration and receipt of additional evidence. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of any entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, and a remand to the Hearing Examiner for receipt of such evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. (Ord. 4389, 1-25- 93) 5. Council Evaluation Criteria: The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record,the Hearing Examiner's report,the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. 6. Findings and Conclusions Required: If,upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F1 and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record,it may remand the preceding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. 7. Council Action: If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section RMC 4-1-050F2 and F3, and after examination of the record,the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified,the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decision upon the application. 8. Decision Documentation: In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shall rest with the appellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 9. Council Action Final: The action of the Council approving,modifying or rejecting a decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive, unless appealed within the time frames under subsection G5 of this Section. (Ord. 4660, 3-17-1997) +4254307300 RENTON DEV SVCS/PLAN 556 P02 DEC 22 '98 16:58 APPEAL HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENJCO 2 C9OUNCrL. FILE NO. LUA-98— L2 3 , SA—H , SM , V UU�t RECEIVED APPLICATION NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments ^ITY CLERK'S 4Frl� � The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated November 23 1998 .&letter of clarification 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY dated 1 2- 15-9 8 APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE(IF ANY): Name: Trammell Crow Residential Name: John Wayland Address: 4010 Lake Washington Blvd . NE Address: 4010 Lake Washington Blvd . NE Kirkland , WA 98033 Kirkland , WA 98033 Telephone No. (4 2 5) 8 2 8—3 0 0 3 Telephone No. (rA 2 5) 7 3_9—7 6 5 5 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets,if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. Error: Sc reverse, side Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction: OTHER No. Error: • Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation,if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: x Modify the decision or recommendation . allows: Remand to the Examiner • further co.• • .-• 'on as follows: Other __ A•.ell• .t/Representative Signature. Date NO • 'lease refer to Title N,Chapter 8,of the Renton Municipal Code,and Section 4-8-16,for specific procedures. heappeal.doc ATTACHMENT TO APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION File No. LUA-98-123,SA-H, SM, V TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: Modify the decision as follows: Decision No. 8 and 11: The first items requested to be modified deal with the setback intrusions noted in Conditions No. 8 and 11. City Code Section 4-31-8:D.7.b states that if the RiiM lot abuts a lot zoned RC, R-1, R- 5, R-8 or R-10, a 25-foot side or rear yard setback shall be required along the abutting sides of property. Properties zoned R-1 abut the site to the north, and property zoned R-8 abuts a portion of the site on the east. According to the definitions section of the zoning code, setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line. The site plan shows a 25-foot setback from the property line. One corner of a proposed garage intrudes into the setback at the northeast corner, and this intrusion can be rectified. No other buildings intrude into the setback area. Parking and driving aisles are located in the setback area. Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant, requests that City Council modify Conditions 8 and 11 to allow parking and drive isles in the setback area of the proposed site plan. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: Modify the decision as follows: Decision No. 12: Decision No 12 conditions the parking stalls along the east side of the property to be covered as carports. This condition creates a conflict with the modification requested in Conditions No. 8 and 11. If parking were to be allowed in the setback area, code requirements do not allow any structures to be built in setback area. If covered parking in the setback area is to be allowed, a variance would need to be granted. Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant, requests the City Council to either reverse Decision No. 12 or grant a variance to allow covered parking in the setback area. FOSTE ' E P P E R & SHEFELMA P L L C ATTORNEYS AT Li a' GPPL A4 EA T FIA Direct Phone (425) 646-3711 Direct Fac n,tle (206) 749-2102 January 22, 1999 E-Mail bendj@a,foster.cum VIA FACSIMILE CITY OF RENTON AND U.S. MAIL JAN 2 5 1999 FECENED City Council C?TY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton C/o City Clerk 777 1osIi 1055 South Grady Way AVEN F Renton, WA 98055 Suite I ; - BELLE% I1 Re: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Wash,,, P 98o04 LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, V Telepi' .: Dear :Council Members l 4=5 4, I Facsi,,,r • This letter is submitted in behalf of Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant W ebs,;•` ` with regard to the above referenced site plan review application(the"Applicant"). wwu This letter is a supplement to the appeal previously submitted for the Applicant by John Wayland on December 28, 1998 (the "Appeal"). The Appeal pertains to the November 23, 1998 decision of the Hearing Examiner with respect to the application. In addition to the issues raised by Mr. Wayland in the Appeal, the Applicant respectfully requests the Council to review an additional condition imposed by the Hearing Examiner in a letter dated January 14, 1998 to Jennifer Henning of the '""' Alaska Development Services Division. That letter endeavored to clarify issues raised by Ms. Henning in a December 28, 1998 memorandum to the Examiner. A copy of the BELLE l Examiner's letter and Ms. Henning's memorandum is enclosed for your convenience. Wash,.,: FORTES, The additional condition imposed in the Examiner's letter provides in pertinent part: S EATII ! No parking shall be permitted in any of the special setback areas defined by gas'"° code. 21003217 01 January 22, 1999 Page 2 As a result of the foregoing prohibition, the Tamaron Pointe Apartments will lose 20 parking spaces that were associated with Building 14 on the Site Plan. Building 14 would consequently be left with an undesirable number of parking spaces in close proximity to it, causing a significant hardship for the future residents of that building, as much of the remaining parking spaces would otherwise be more distant from that building. The Applicant requests that the above referenced condition be deleted and substituted with a finding by the Council that the proposed 20 parking spaces may be located in the special setback area as is permitted by Section 4-31-8(D)(10), Renton Municipal Code. No variance is necessary to allow surface parking in a special setback area is it may be permitted as part of the site plan review process. The subject approval condition should be deleted for the reason that the Examiner's letter does not identify any adverse affect to be caused by the parking in this area that would justify such an extreme mitigating condition as this outright prohibition of use of this area, other than for landscaping. The Examiner's letter does not cite evidence in the record upon which this condition is based. This is understandable because there was no testimony or other evidence admitted into the record of potential impacts of parking in this area. Requiring landscaping, rather than parking in this area, as is indicated by the Examiner's letter, would serve no real purpose. Adjacent to the east of this area of the site is a steep slope hillside upon which there is no development. The steep slope conditions will prevent development of this adjoining area in the future as well. Thus, the landscaping area required by the Examiner will abut upon undeveloped hillside,providing no meaningful aesthetic benefit while eliminating convenient parking for residents of the site. Moreover, no adverse impact of the proposed parking has been identified and thus there is no foundation for the "mitigating" condition prohibiting the subject parking. The Examiner's letter only speculates that unspecified adverse affect could occur"if not now, at some possible future time",but does not identify what that affect may be nor identify the evidence in the record which supports this concern. A special setback area typically serves the purpose of buffering less intense development from that which may be more intense. That condition does not exist in this situation as a steep hillside abuts the east property line of the subject property at this location. As it is an undevelopable area, it cannot become less intensive development that might justify buffering. As a consequence, the underlying reason for a special setback area is not present in this situation, fully justifying the location of 20 surface parking spaces as has been proposed by the Applicant. No objection has been referenced by the Development Services Department nor any other party of record. There has been no call for a buffer in this area and none is warranted as the adjoining steep sloped area provides an effective buffer to single family residential development further to the east. Based upon the factual errors and legal deficiency of supporting evidence, the Applicant urges the Council to reverse the Examiner's decision in pertinent part and modify it consistent 2100321701 January 22, 1999 Page 3 with the Appeal , as supplemented by this letter. Thank you for considering the Applicant's concerns regarding the subject approval conditions. ery ruly ours r Jo L. Hendrickson Encls. cc: John Wayland Jennifer Henning Zannetta Fontes 21003217.01 C) CITE 3F RENTON amk. City Clerk Jesse Tanner,Mayor Marilyn J. Petersen February 4, 1999 APPEAL FILED BY: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision on the Tamaron Pointe Apaitiiients Site Plan and Variance, located at 2100 Lake Washington Blvd., File No. SA-98-123 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding Trammell Crow Residential's request for site plan and variance has been filed with the City Clerk. In accordance with Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110F, within five days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee at 4:00 p.m. on March 18, 1999, in the 7th floor Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, 98055. The recommendation of the Committee will be presented for consideration by the full Council at a subsequent Council meeting. Attached is a copy of the Renton Municipal Code regarding appeals of Hearing Examiner decisions or recommendations. Please note that the City Council will be considering the merits of the appeal based upon the written record previously established. Unless a showing can be made that additional evidence could not reasonably have been available at the prior hearing held by the Hearing Examiner,no further evidence or testimony on this matter will be accepted by the City Council. For additional information or assistance,please feel free to call. Sincerely, Maril . tersen, CMC City Clerk Attachment 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6510 /FAX(425)430-6516 ®This paper contains 50 i recycled material,20%post consumer +4254307300 RENTON DEV SVCS/PLAN 556 P02 DEC 22 '98 16:58 • _ APPEAL HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO REN5O 2 C 9_COUNCIL. C FILE NO. LUA-98- 123 , SA-H , SM, V DE APPLICATION NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments CITT RECEIVED co -OFFICE The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the decision or recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner,dated November 23 1998 .&letter of clarification 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY dated 1 2- 1 5-9 8 APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE(IF ANY): Name: Trammell Crow Residential Name: John Wayland Address: 4010 Lake Washington Blvd . NE Address: 4010 Lake Washington Blvd . NE Kirkland , WA 98033 Kirkland , WA 98033 Telephone No. (4 2 5 ) 8 2 8-3 0 0 3 Telephone No. (4 2 5 ) 7 3 9-7 6 5 5 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDING OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's report) No. Error: See a-Ha( /12_A Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction OTHER No. Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following:relief. (Attach explanation, if desired) Reverse the decision or recommendation and grant the following relief: x Modify the decision or recommendation • 'lows: Remand to the Examiner further co - • "on as follows: Other *1212142: A ..-ii 'epresentative Signature Date NO •• 'lease refer to Title IV,Chapter 8,of the Renton Municipal Code,and Section 4-8-16,for specific procedures. heappeaI.doc ATTACHMENT TO APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION File No. LUA-98-123,SA-H, SM,V TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: Modify the decision as follows: Decision No. 8 and 11: The first items requested to be modified deal with the setback intrusions noted in Conditions No. 8 and 11. City Code Section 4-31-8:D.7.b states that if the RM lot abuts a lot zoned RC, R-1, R- 5, R-8 or R-10, a 25-foot side or rear yard setback shall be required along the abutting sides of property. Properties zoned R-1 abut the site to the north, and property zoned R-8 abuts a portion of the site on the east. According to the definitions section of the zoning code, setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line. The site plan shows a 25-foot setback from the property line. One corner of a proposed garage intrudes into the setback at the northeast corner, and this intrusion can be rectified. No other buildings intrude into the setback area. Parking and driving aisles are located in the setback area. Trammell Crow Residential,the applicant, requests that City Council modify Conditions 8 and 11 to allow parking and drive isles in the setback area of the proposed site plan. • SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: Modify the decision as follows: Decision No. 12: Decision No 12 conditions the parking stalls along the east side of the property to be covered as carports. This condition creates a conflict with the modification requested in Conditions No. 8 and 11. If parking were to be allowed in the setback area, code requirements do not allow any structures to be built in setback area. If covered parking in the setback area is to be allowed, a variance would need to be granted. Trammell Crow Residential,the applicant, requests the City Council to either reverse Decision No. 12 or grant a variance to allow covered parking in the setback area. FOSTER. PEPPER & SHEFELMA PLLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW Direct Phone (425) 646-3731 Direct Facsimile (206) 749-2102 January 22, 1999 E-Mail hendj@foster.com VIA FACSIMILE CITY OF RENTON AND U.S.MAIL JAN 2 5 1999 RECEIVED City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton C/o City Clerk 777 IO8TH 1055 South Grady Way AVENUE N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Suite 1500 BELLEVUE Re: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Washington 98004-5118 LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM,V Telephone Dear :Council Members (4 z 5)4 5 1-0 5 0 0 Facsimile (425)455-5487 This letter is submitted in behalf of Trammell Crow Residential, the applicant Website with regard to the above referenced site plan review application(the"Applicant"). W W W.FOSTER.C O M This letter is a supplement to the appeal previously submitted for the Applicant by John Wayland on December 28, 1998 (the "Appeal"). The Appeal pertains to the November 23, 1998 decision of the Hearing Examiner with respect to the application. In addition to the issues raised by Mr. Wayland in the Appeal,the Applicant respectfully requests the Council to review an additional condition imposed by the Hearing Examiner in a letter dated January 14, 1998 to Jennifer Henning of the ANCHORAGE Alaska Development Services Division. That letter endeavored to clarify issues raised by Ms. Henning in a December 28, 1998 memorandum to the Examiner. A copy of the BELLEVUE Examiner's letter and Ms. Henning's memorandum is enclosed for your convenience. Washington PORTLAND The additional condition imposed in the Examiner's letter provides in Oregon pertinent part: SEATTLE No parking shall be permitted in any of the special setback areas defined by Washington code. 21003217.01 January 22, 1999 Page 2 As a result of the foregoing prohibition, the Tamaron Pointe Apartments will lose 20 parking spaces that were associated with Building 14 on the Site Plan. Building 14 would consequently be left with an undesirable number of parking spaces in close proximity to it, causing a significant hardship for the future residents of that building, as much of the remaining parking spaces would otherwise be more distant from that building. The Applicant requests that the above referenced condition be deleted and substituted with a finding by the Council that the proposed 20 parking spaces may be located in the special setback area as is permitted by Section 4-31-8(D)(10), Renton Municipal Code. No variance is necessary to allow surface parking in a special setback area is it may be permitted as part of the site plan review process. The subject approval condition should be deleted for the reason that the Examiner's letter does not identify any adverse affect to be caused by the parking in this area that would justify such an extreme mitigating condition as this outright prohibition of use of this area, other than for landscaping. The Examiner's letter does not cite evidence in the record upon which this condition is based. This is understandable because there was no testimony or other evidence admitted into the record of potential impacts of parking in this area. Requiring landscaping, rather than parking in this area, as is indicated by the Examiner's letter,would serve no real purpose. Adjacent to the east of this area of the site is a steep slope hillside upon which there is no development. The steep slope conditions will prevent development of this adjoining area in the future as well. Thus, the landscaping area required by the Examiner will abut upon undeveloped hillside,providing no meaningful aesthetic benefit while eliminating convenient parking for residents of the site. Moreover,no adverse impact of the proposed parking has been identified and thus there is no foundation for the "mitigating" condition prohibiting the subject parking. The Examiner's letter only speculates that unspecified adverse affect could occur"if not now, at some possible future time",but does not identify what that affect may be nor identify the evidence in the record which supports this concern. A special setback area typically serves the purpose of buffering less intense development from that which may be more intense. That condition does not exist in this situation as a steep hillside abuts the east property line of the subject property at this location. As it is an undevelopable area, it cannot become less intensive development that might justify buffering. As a consequence,the underlying reason for a special setback area is not present in this situation, fully justifying the location of 20 surface parking spaces as has been proposed by the Applicant. No objection has been referenced by the Development Services Department nor any other party of record. There has been no call for a buffer in this area and none is warranted as the adjoining steep sloped area provides an effective buffer to single family residential development further to the east. Based upon the factual errors and legal deficiency of supporting evidence, the Applicant urges the Council to reverse the Examiner's decision in pertinent part and modify it consistent 21003217.01 January 22, 1999 Page 3 with the Appeal , as supplemented by this letter. Thank you for considering the Applicant's concerns regarding the subject approval conditions. ery ly urs Jo L. Hendrickson Encls. cc: John Wayland Jennifer Henning Zannetta Fontes 21003217.01 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON o�; °* FEB 11999 RECEIVED DATE: January 11,1999 TO: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Dennis Conte SUBJECT: Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park Meeting; February 2,1999. The Lake Terrace Homeowners Association voted to create a partnership with the Low Income Housing Institute (LIHI) and to execute the first right of refusal to purchase the park. LIHI obtained a copy of the sale agreement between Trammel Crow Residential and the current owners on January 13,1999. The partnership has 30 days to exercise the first right of refusal. The park sold for $5.6 million, therefore a down payment of $112,000 (2% of the sale price) must go into an earnest account by February 13, 1999. LIHI has estimated that the purchase, planning, development, and improvement budget will run between $6.75 to $7.0 million and identified six possible funding sources: 1. State Housing Trust Fund 2. King County Housing Finance Office 3. Federal Home Loan Bank 4. Tax Exempt Bonds 5. Private Loans with insured by HUD 6. City of Renton CDBG Funding The loan payments will raise the rents at the park, but LIHI must guarantee that the rents remain affordable (less than 30% of gross income) for the low-income households. LIHI and Lake Terrace Park Homeowners Association believe that the City of Renton should assist them in purchasing this park as stated in Objective H-J and Policy H-71 in the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan (attached). The current status for the park shows that there are 60 mobile homes and 8 RV units. The relocation coordinator for Trammel Crow, Robert Murray, expects 6 mobile homes to move in February. If Trammel Crow is successful in helping the renters find space in another park and assist with the relocation process, the first right of refusal option will become more difficult to accomplish. The next meeting will take place on February 16`h, at 7:30 p.m. Summary of the February 2, 1999, Lake Terrace Homeowners Association meeting The Lake Terrace Homeowners Association met on February 2,1999, at 7:30 p.m. Thirty people attended representing approximately twenty households of the park. Roger Haynes, President of Lake Terrace Homeowners Association and Sandra Kraft, Secretary, chaired the meeting. The Low Income Housing Institute (LIHI) sent three representatives. Dennis Conte was the only staff member from the City of Renton. Scheduling conflicts prevented any city council members from attending. The Association discussed several issues regarding the sale and eviction of the homeowners. • The owners would like to challenge the legality of the eviction notice they received in August because they think Trammel Crow actually entered and signed an agreement with the owners of the park back in March 1998. They believe they are entitled to a five-month extension on the existing eviction. They also think that Trammel Crow has not acted in good faith because it took them five months to acquire the sale agreement. The agreement was received on January 13, 1999. The attorney for Trammel Crow provided the sale agreement under protest stating that the association is not legal. • The association talked to SeaFirst Bank about buying the park. They were advised that every household would need to come up with $25 to $40 thousand for the down payment. The owners communicated that this was impossible and they should consider another strategy. • The next discussion was centered on the possibility of LIHI buying the property and how the park would be managed once LIHI became the owners. LIHI explained that they would support a resident management association if they purchased the property. LIHI staff addressed questions regarding the purchase of the park. The discussion of schedules, budget, and funding filled most of the meeting. • LIHI stated that the association must exercise first right of refusal within 30 days of receiving the sale agreement. The park sold for $5.6 million. A down payment of$112,000 (2% of the sale price) must go into an earnest account by February 13, 1999. • If the association wanted LIHI to execute the first right of refusal then they must have a unanimous vote at this meeting. The decision to execute the first right of refusal was voted on, and was unanimous. • The estimate to purchase, plan and develop the park is $6.75 - $7.0 million. The loan payments will force the association to increase the rents at the park. • LIHI listed the agencies that they have identified for funding. • LIHI emphasized the need for the tenants to complete the household profile forms (demographics). • LIHI encouraged the tenants to lobby with the State Housing Office and local legislators to support the applications to buy the park. The homeowners' association and LIHI had several requests for information from the City. • How is the city addressing the need for more affordable housing and what is it doing to preserve the affordable housing stock? • Does the city care about the increased traffic on Lake Washington Boulevard and Coulon Park created by development here? • What is the time line for Trammel Crow's appeal of the Environmental Review decision by the Committee and the Hearing Examiner? CITY OF RENTON HOUSING ELEMENT Objective H-J: The City shall assist in converting existing mobile home parks to resident ownership through grant funding, technical assistance, coordination with nonprofit groups, and general support. Policy H-71. The owners and residents of encouraged to voluntarily contribute financial mobile home parks annexed into the City, shall resources towards the relocation of low income be approached about the possibility of conversion residents. to resident or nonprofit park ownership. If no agreement can be reached and the current owners Policy H-72. The City shall work with King desire to apply for a conversion to another land County, the King County Housing Authority, use, the City shall make all possible efforts to and nonprofit housing authorities to develop or assist the relocation of affected households with expand manufactured housing parks which are incomes below 50% of Countywide median designed to accommodate relocated mobile income. Park owners will be strongly homes and trailers. Objective H-K: The City should encourage the use of quality, modular, factory-built affordable housing which meets infill development standards. Policy H-73. To expand the range of home Uniform Building Code, in any zone allowing ownership options Renton shall allow and residential uses. Such housing must meet all encourage the use of "gold seal" modular factory applicable city codes and be placed on a built housing built to the standards of the permanent foundations. NEIGHBORHOODS Existing Housing Stock Renton's existing housing stock is the dominant feature of the residential neighborhoods in the City. It creates much of the existing character of the community and will provide a significant proportion of the middle and moderate income housing in the City in the future. In some cases existing housing will be demolished and replaced with new commercial development or higher density residential development. In these cases the economic development objectives of the City or the vision of more intensive urban residential development, particularly in the mixed use core will appear to contradict the goal of preserving and protecting existing housing stock. The existing housing stock includes a number of units which by virtue of their condition, age or location may be subject to demolition or change of use over the next 20 years. The City should consider measures to retain as much of this housing as possible. Currently the City enforces building maintenance codes through a complaint based system and is now investigating a scheduled inspection system for multi-family housing. The City also is active in funding two programs through the Community Development Block Grants designed to prevent deterioration of housing in Renton. Housing Conditions No recent physical condition survey is available to analyze the condition of Renton's exiting housing stock. Data from a 1981 King County study indicated 35% of single family, duplex and triplex units in Renton needed moderate repair and 20% needed major repairs. The same study indicated that 42% of multi- family units in buildings often or more units needed minor repair and 4% needed major repair. A 1989 survey of multi-family housing units done as part of Renton's Community Profile found the 56% were in good condition, 41% were in moderate condition(in need of minor repair) and 3% were in poor condition(in need of major repair). III-24 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 28, 1998 TO: Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner FROM: Jennifer Henning SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments (File No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, V-H, SM,ECF) I'm writing this memo to seek clarification regarding correspondence exchanged between your office and the applicant for the above-referenced project. The applicant wrote to you seeking clarification regarding Condition Nos. 8 and 11 from your November 23, 1998 Decision. Condition No. 8 requires that the setback intrusion into the northeast corner of the site be rectified. Condition No. 11 requires the applicant to remove any intrusions into required setbacks and provide appropriate landscaping in those areas. Furthermore, Condition No. 12 requires that the applicant provide carports with roofs along the eastern boundary of the site for all of those spaces now located between the garage in the northeast corner of the site and the two garages in the central eastern boundary. It appears that the conditions require the applicant to convert surface parking to covered parking (carports)within special setback areas. However, the special setbacks, as stated, are intended to provide a separation between structures and less intensive adjacent zoning. The Hearing Examiner has the authority through Site Plan Review to permit the applicant to propose circulation areas and surface parking within special setback areas. Otherwise,the special setback areas must be landscaped. The Conditions appear to prohibit the development of parking to serve Building No. 14, a 28-unit structure,that relies on surface and garage parking to serve residents. During the review of the proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, parking was discussed for the proposal, and the ERC scrutinized the proposed parking for the two larger multi-family structures. The ERC evaluates all proposals brought to them for adequate parking and circulation, especially for emergency vehicles. The ERC was comfortable that adequate parking was being provided for proposed Building No. 14. However, in light of the conditions, and the your response letter of December 15th to the applicant, it appears that the project is in jeopardy of losing 20 parking stalls on the east boundary of the site, due to the requirement for carports. This leaves only 26 parking stalls that could serve the 28 proposed units. The special setbacks are intended to buffer more intensive development from less intensive development. An appropriate special setback would be achieved in the area of concern due to the fact that the existing topography of the adjacent site to the east could not be developed within 25 feet of the property boundary as the site is too steep. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\}1:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\98-123.JTH\KAUFMN.DOC December 23, 1998 Page 2 Staff would respectfully request that the conditions be clarified. Code will not let staff permit structures within the special setback, however,the Examiner has the authority to permit surface parking and circulation aisles. This memo is written in haste, in order to bring the matter to your attention prior to the end of the appeal period. I will be away from the office on December 28 and December 29, but welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you further upon my return. Thank you for your consideration. cc: Jana Huerter PARTIES OF RECORD TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V Roger Haynes Bill Barlow John Wayland 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#62 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#91 4010 Lk Wash. Blvd N#330 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Kirkland, WA 98033 Zanetta Fontes John Hendrickson Jennifer Henning 1055 S Grady Way 777 108th Avenue NE, #1500 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 98055 Mona Vaught Richard Hopkins Grace Stiller 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#67 2511 Park PI N 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#80 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Richard Galvin Richard Wagner Mark Jacobs 2407 Garden Court N 2411 Garden Court N 2101 112th Ave NE#100 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Bellevue, WA 98004 Marc McGinnis Greg Diener Ishbel Dickens 13256 NE 20th, #16 130 Andover Park E, #300 1021 NE 70th Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98115 Phil Rutledge Gary Palmer Neil Watts 19336 47th Avenue NE 2507 Park Place N 1055 S Grady Way Seattle, WA 98155 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 David Sager Eric & Cindy Korn Shirley and Odell Milliren 1025 N 28th Place 1211 N 28th Place 1020 N 28th Place Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Manfred and Anne Hansen Dean H. Schellert Barbara Smith 1221 N 26th Street 1013 N 28th Place 1308 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 LaVerne and Mary Jo Graves Patrick McDonald Song Qiao 905 N 28th Place 160 Vashon Place NE 1412 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98056 Sondra Kraft Kim and Theo Brown Charles Jensen 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#68 1003 N 28th Place 2621 Meadow Place N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Tina and Jerry Cullers Dean& Cynthia Schumacher Donald & Patricia Rosburg 2506 Meadow Avenue N 1116 N 28th Place 1402 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Robert and Esther Miller Steve and Julie Wasson Barry Oman 1121 N 28th Place 2515 Park Place N 2500 Lk Wash. Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 James Scott M. L. Gibson Marlene Mandt 1405 N 28th 1215 N 28th Place 1408 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Glyn Gardner Bill & Madeline Arrigoni J. Steve &Nancy Harar 2100 Lk Wash Blvd N #84 907 N 34th Street 11326 Rainier Ave S Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98178 Norma Cugini Gerard& Barbara Shellan Alex Cugini, Jr. 611 Renton S 11 Lummi Key P.O. Box 359 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98057 Nancy Stark Bill Kelly G. J. Duranleau Mark Mykel 4026 133rd Avenue SE 3701 Park Avenue N 1409 N 26th Street Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Linda Babcock 2801 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 NOTES] OTES RECEIPT DATE a No. 2326 RECEIVED FROM Jin i't ay 1 nd ' ' � ADDRESS C FOR elci (ti"tIt 14 54 - tb .--ia-i 4j ACCOUNT HOWOEM �� AMT.OF ACCOUNT CASH r,' 0 Q ^\ PAD CHECK 6/ BALANCE MONEY BY‘14 itA l(/ 44/" / _ DUE ORDER 0191111 ISFOPri®6L8O2 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 23, 1998 Trammel Crowe 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.NE Suite 330 Kirkland WA 98033-7866 Attn: Julie Haynes Dear Ms. Haynes: Subject: Tamaron Point Apartments Service Availability The proposed Tamaron Point Apartments is within the City of Renton service districts for both sanitary sewer and water. The city has facilities in the area and will serve the proposed project. Any larger or additional facilities required to serve this project will be at the expense of the developer, with service and maintenance provided by the City of Renton upon completion and acceptance of any new mains or meters. • Sincerely, Kay K. Kittrick Public Works Inspections &Permits Development Services Division TAMPOINT.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 Thie ne,nnr rnnlnine Ffl%rnrvrlcrl m�/cril OflOL nnol...... i...e. CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 23, 1998 TO: Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner FROM: Jennifer Henning dTh SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments (File No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, V-H, SM,ECF) I'm writing this memo to seek clarification regarding correspondence exchanged between your office and the applicant for the above-referenced project. The applicant wrote to you seeking clarification regarding Condition Nos. 8 and 11 from your November 23, 1998 Decision. Condition No. 8 requires that the setback intrusion into the northeast corner of the site be rectified. Condition No. 11 requires the applicant to remove any intrusions into required setbacks and provide appropriate landscaping in those areas. Furthermore, Condition No. 12 requires that the applicant provide carports with roofs along the eastern boundary of the site for all of those spaces now located between the garage in the northeast corner of the site and the two garages in the central eastern boundary. It appears that the conditions require the applicant to convert surface parking to covered parking(carports)within special setback areas. However,the special setbacks state are intended to provide a separation between structures and less intensive adjacent zoning. The Hearing Examiner has the authority through Site Plan Review to permit the applicant to propose circulation areas and surface parking within special setback areas. Otherwise,the special setback areas must be landscaped. The Conditions appear to prohibit the development of parking to serve Building No. 14, a 28-unit structure,that relies on surface and garage parking to serve residents. During the review of the proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, parking was discussed for the proposal, and the ERC scrutinized the proposed parking for the two larger multi-family structures. The ERC evaluates all proposals brought to them for adequate parking and circulation, especially for emergency vehicles. The ERC was comfortable that adequate parking was being provided for proposed Building No. 14. However, in light of the conditions, and the your response letter of December 15th to the applicant, it appears that the project is in jeopardy of losing 20 parking stalls on the east boundary of the site, due to the requirement for carports. This leaves only about 26 parking stalls that could serve the 28 proposed units. The special setbacks are intended to buffer more intensive development from less intensive development. An appropriate special setback would be achieved in the area of concern due to the fact that the existing topography of the adjacent site to the east could not be developed within 25 feet of the property boundary as the site is too steep. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\98-123.JTH\KAUFMN.DOC December 23, 1998 Page 2 Staff would respectfully request that the conditions be clarified. Code will not let staff permit structures within the special setback, however,the Examiner has the authority to permit surface parking and circulation aisles. This memo is written in haste, in order to bring the matter to your attention prior to the end of the appeal period. I will be away from the office on December 28 and December 29, but welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you further upon my return. Thank you for your consideration. cc: " • CIT 4POF RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman December 15, 1998 Mr:John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033-7866 Re: Request for Clarification - Tamaron Pointe Apartments File No. LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V Dear Mr. Wayland: This office has reviewed the request to clarify the decision. Any structures would have to observe the appropriate setback lines as determined by staff. Staff initially raised the issue vis-a- vis the code requirements. The intent of Condition Number 10 was to avoid creating any cuts which would create unsuitable or unstable "walls" or cuts that might compromise the stability of the existing steep slopes as was recommended in the technical reports and testimony. The recommendation was to keep these walls or cuts to three or four foot limits. Any changes should be supported by both a geotechnical analysis and appropriately engineered solutions which still minimize any intrusive work in the steep sloped areas. If this office can provide any additional assistance,please feel free to write. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy, Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev. Administrator South County Journal Parties of Record(see attached) 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 7, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning FROM: Gregg Zimmerman SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Parking Code Modification Request Jennifer,I am confused by one aspect of this modification request. On page 2, item 2),you state that "the applicant's request assumes that tandem parking on aprons behind the garages is acceptable as satisfying a portion of the parking requirement. If the tandem parking was not counted toward the requirement,then the project would be providing only 259 of the required 319 parking stalls." It is not clear to me whether consideration of these tandem spaces as parking stalls is part of the modification request. Does the Code allow counting these tandem spaces as parking stalls or not? If the Code does not allow counting these spaces as parking stalls,then this needs to be included in the modification request, and I will need more information in order to reach a decision. As I understand the request,the applicant proposes to provide 372 stalls that are allowable to be counted pursuant to the Code. The requested modification is to allow construction of 53.5 parking spaces over the permitted 318.5 parking spaces. While construction of additional spaces seems prudent considering the lack of available street parking,I am concerned that some of the proposed parking would require cutting into the slope along the northeast property line and installation of a rockery. In the first place, I am concerned about the use of an 8-foot tall rockery as a retaining wall for an existing slope. This concern is compounded by the history of unstable slopes along this stretch of Lake Washington Blvd. and the adjacent properties. I am unwilling to approve a modification that would create extra parking stalls requiring excavation into potentially unstable slopes along the property lines. I believe such construction could create adverse impacts to other property(ies)in the vicinity. In summary,I am not willing to approve extra parking stalls that require excavation into slopes along the property lines, and I require more information about the tandem parking issues before I can make a determination. Thanks. cc: \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\C:\WINDOWS\DOC3.DOC Opt, 4,74 CITY OF RENTON ��FRFNN�"riN PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DAr' 0iit 19 oN MEMORANDUM ' 98 11 •0 DATE: December 3, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning FROM: Gregg Zimmerman C. SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Parking Code Modification Request Jennifer, I am confused by one aspect of this modification request. On page 2, item 2),you state that"the applicant's request assumes that tandem parking on aprons behind the garages is acceptable as satisfying a portion of the parking requirement. If the tandem parking was not counted toward the requirement,then the project would be providing only 259 of the required 319 parking stalls." It is not clear to me whether consideration of these tandem spaces as parking stalls is part of the modification request. Does the Code allow counting these tandem spaces as parking stalls or not? If the Code does not allow counting these spaces as parking stalls,then this needs to be included in the modification request, and I will need more information in order to reach a decision. As I understand the request,the applicant proposes to provide 372 stalls that are allowable to be counted pursuant to the Code. The requested modification is to allow construction of 53.5 parking spaces over the permitted 318.5 parking spaces. While construction of additional spaces seems prudent considering the lack of available street parking,I am concerned that some of the proposed parking would require cutting into the slope along the northeast property line and installation of a rockery. In the first place,I am concerned about the use of an 8-foot tall rockery as a retaining wall for an existing slope. This concern is compounded by the history of unstable slopes along this stretch of Lake Washington Blvd. and the adjacent properties. I am unwilling to approve a modification that would create extra parking stalls requiring excavation into potentially unstable slopes along the property lines. I believe such construction could create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. In summary, I am not willing to approve extra parking stalls that require excavation into slopes along the property lines,and I require more information about the tandem parking issues before I can make a determination. Thanks. cc: \\TS_S ERV ER\SYS2\COMMON\Document3 • John H. TECIR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL Development Associated 1 \J ` West Coast Group 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,N.E. Suite 330 city pE RENMINER Kirkland,WA 98033-7866 pEpROVA (425)828-3003 FAX(425)828-0904 December 1, 1998 SENT VIA FAX: (425) 430-6523 HARD COPY TO FOLLOW Mr. Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way 7th Floor Renton, WA 98055 RE: Request for Clarification of Conditions Tamaron Pointe Apartments File No. LUA-99-123,SA-H,SM,V Dear Mr. Examiner: Trammell Crow Residential (TCR)requests clarification of several conditions of the Hearing Examiner's Decision approving the Site Plan for Tamaron Pointe Apartments. The first item to be clarified is with regard to the setback intrusions noted in Conditions No. 8 and 11. City Code Section 4-31-8:D.7.b states that if the RM lot abuts a lot zoned RC, R-1, R-5, R-8 or R-10, a 25- foot side or rear yard setback shall be required along the abutting sides of property. Properties zoned R-1 abut the site to the north, and property zoned R-8 abuts a portion of the site on the east. According to the definitions section of the zoning code, setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the property line. The site plan shows a 25-foot setback from the property line. One corner of a proposed garage intrudes into the setback at the northeast corner, and this intrusion can be rectified. No other buildings intrude into the setback area. Parking and driving aisles are located in the setback area. Do Conditions 8 and 11 require the removal of the parking areas and drive aisles away from the setback? The second clarification is also related to the above-mentioned setback issue. Condition No. 12 indicated that carports will be required for all parking spaces located along the eastern boundary of the site. This condition appears to require the introduction of a structure (carport) into the setback area. Please clarify this apparent conflict as stated in the conditions. Finally, the third clarification deals with Condition No. 10 regarding the disturbance of any steep slopes over about three to four feet. Is this condition meant to limit the intrusion into the steep slope area to four feet or is this condition limiting the height of any retaining walls near the edge • Mr. Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton December 1, 1998 Page Two of the steep slope area to four feet? As the Site Plan shows,there are no intrusions into the steep slope areas on the east side of the project,however there are three to four foot retaining walls near the edge of the eastern steep slopes. If TCR is required to regrade the site in any amount to meet the requirements of Condition No. 13,then those retaining walls will increase in height accordingly. Please clarify. Thank you for your consideration to these issues. It would be greatly appreciated to have a timely response to these conditions prior to December 7, 1998,the end of the appeal period. Sincerely, Jo Wayland cc: Jennifer Henning Bill Rutledge Greg Diener Clyde Holland Bob BeVan Judge Gerard Shellan CITY CLERK DIVISION DI , ' JI Send Copies To: Date: • CITY ATTORNEY J r( CITY COUNCIL(ntwsp ''WW�inC. hi &c�.'tda ?a-t) COMMUNITY SERVICES/PARKS � • e9- EDNSP/ECONOMIC DEVELOP. Ainv ant4 FINANCE/INFO SERVICES I FIRE DEPT/FIRE PREVENTIO C L04 a' ' OI HEARING EXAMINER HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MGMT HUMAN SERVICES OIMM LIBRARIES MAYOR/EXECUTIVE o MUNICIPAL COURT Ill cr q PLANNING COMMISSION POLICE o. CODIFIER n NEWSPAPER n I I PARTIES OF RECORD Planning/Building/Public Works: • N 1 ADMINISTRATION g1199 2,,."',wmciw N61 s •• AIRPORT G(.fin • • g DEVELOPMENT SERVICES �Dev. S�res. D‘ ect�r 'a 1 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 501m014a •' • • / UTILITIES&TECH SERVICES tr -Hornsby "' N l 4 be et • 3 3 a • 0 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 23rd day of November ,1998, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: l SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of I10/I4/14a 1998. keh Notary Public iR and for the State of Washington, residing at p/i �'� , therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Tamaron Pointe Apartments LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT November 23, 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISIONS APPELLANT: Lake Terrace Mobile Home Owners Assn. Appeal of ERC's Determination for Tamaron Pointe Apartments File No.: LUA98-160,AAD APPLICANT: Trammell Crow Residential Tamaron Pointe Apartments File No.: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,V LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Blvd.N SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To develop a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres SUMMARY OF APPEAL: Request that the applicant be required to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Appellant's written request for a hearing and examining the available information on file,the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES: APPEAL The following minutes are a summary of the October 27, 1998 appeal hearing. The official record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,October 27, 1998,at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record for the appeal: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the appeal, Exhibit No.2: Hopkins' scale neighborhood map proof of posting and publication,and other documentation pertinent to the appeal. Exhibit No.3: Five photographs(Hopkins) Exhibit No. 4: Blocked view map (Hopkins) Exhibit No. 5: Diener letter Exhibit No.6: Jacobs letter Exhibit No. 7: Neighborhood detail map Exhibit No. 8: Site plan Exhibit No. 9: Zoning map Exhibit No. 10: View section Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 2 Exhibit No. 11: Colored drawings Exhibit No. 12: Colored drawings - pool area Exhibit No. 13: Colored drawings-parking,Bldg. 8 Exhibit No. 14: Colored drawings- entry/overlook Exhibit Nos. 15& 16 : Colored story boards Parties present: Representing Appellant Bill Barlow Roger Haynes 2100 Lake Wash.Blvd.#91 2100 Lake Wash. Blvd.#62 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Representing City of Renton Zanetta Fontes 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Representing Trammell Crow John Hendrickson 777 108th Avenue NE,#1500 Bellevue, WA 98004 The Examiner explained that the appeal was an administrative appeal held pursuant to Ordinance 3071 and was the only administrative review to occur on the matter. The matter may be submitted back to the Examiner for reconsideration if the parties are not satisfied with the decision. He stated that the appellant had the burden of demonstrating that the City's action was erroneous, and would have to show clear and convincing evidence that the City's determination was incorrect. At that point the City could respond, if they chose to do so. The appellant,by and through Roger Haynes,protested the lack of notification by mail to the mobile home residents who were within the 300 foot boundary of the subject site. Even though the mobile home residents pay taxes on their improvements, it was determined that they are not the real property owners to be notified. After much discussion it was determined that for all intents and purposes the residents of the mobile home park were aware of the pending action and the hearing proceeded. Bill Barlow,appellant herein, stated that the City needed more information in order to determine the impact and requested that an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)be required. As part of his presentation,Mr.Barlow listed the items on the environmental checklist which appellant felt were incomplete or misleading on the part of the applicant. These included the types of soils on the site,the instability of the soils,the variance from the land and tree cutting ordinance requested by the applicant. Further areas that applicant felt were inadequately studied were the presence of underground springs on the site,the impact to the local wildlife,and the noise of construction. The amount of the present impervious surface and that proposed was also discussed. Mr. Barlow pointed out that the staff report in its section regarding conformance with the Comprehensive Plan does not reference any policies which are dedicated to low income families nor the advocacy for mobile home parks,and Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 3 it appeared to be a one-sided approach. Of particular concern was the displacement of the residents and the reimbursement of relocation costs. At this point only 25 sites have been located between Lynnwood and Tacoma and the majority are not large enough to handle the mobile homes. More than 50 percent of the mobile park residents were elderly and/or disabled and several had received help from the City of Renton Human Services Division. Mona Vaught,2100 Lake Washington Blvd.,#67,Renton,Washington 98056, stated that she has lived in Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park for 8 years and lives on a small pension and social security and is not able to move, even if there is a place to move. On cross-examination,Ms.Vaught responded that in 1994 she knew the property had been rezoned,but she did not remember reading anything about the rezone when she signed her lease. Mr.Barlow continued that proper consideration had not been given to the safety of the bike riders, nor had enough analysis been given to the highway traffic as impacted by I-405,or the potential for the impact of light rail to this area. He further questioned the traffic study as it pertained to projected traffic trips generated by the proposed development and those of the current use,and pointed out the discrepancies. Mr. Barlow felt that the long term impact of this project and several other pending developments on Lake Washington Boulevard should be considered as a whole,not one by one. The impact to the school district and particularly this area's elementary school is also of concern to the appellants. On cross-examination regarding the fill on site,Mr.Barlow responded that the concern is not that the fill is dangerous,but that it is going to be removed. Appellant stated there are natural steep slopes that should not now be altered. He was further questioned about his concerns regarding the fill material and the proposed cut by Mr. Hendrickson. It is appellant's position that the existing soils will not accommodate all the structures without moving those soils,refilling with other soils and using pilings. Roger Haynes, appellant herein,further reiterated the concerns about impact to the traffic on the I-405 corridor, problems and costs of relocation of the park residents,and the water coming off the steep slopes. Richard Hopkins, 2511 Park Place N,Renton, Washington 98056, stated that he represented the neighbors to the very northeast corner of the site which is directly above,and they are very concerned about any disturbance to the steep slopes. Grace Stiller,2100 Lake Washington Blvd.,#80,Renton,Washington 98056,resident of the mobile home park, testified regarding the existing springs and water on the site. She observed that unless there is a thorough study done on how to handle this water,that there would be problems with the unstable ground and slippage. Marc McGinnis, 13256 NE 20th Street,#16,Bellevue, Washington 98005,applicant geotech consultant herein, described the testing done to determine the soils on site,and the types and location of water on site. He also testified regarding the proposed foundations and grading to be done on site,and the efforts to stabilize the eastern slopes to protect from erosion. On cross-examination,Mr. McGinnis responded that the removal of the existing fill is so that the soil can support the foundations. The existing fill is not properly compacted Greg Diener, 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300, Seattle,Washington 98188, applicant's civil engineer,testified at length regarding the particular issues of the appeal pertaining to excavation and replacement of soils,the Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 4 change of the northern driveway,the survey and calculation of the impervious surface, and the bioswale construction and its relationship to the aquifer. John Wayland.4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,Kirkland, Washington 98033,applicant herein, addressed such issues as animals,noise, adjacent property uses,relocation assistance. He stated that a biologist was unable to locate any eagle nests on site. Regarding the adjacent land uses,to the north of the property is the Griffin Home,to the south is an apartment complex,and to the east are single family residences. Mr.Hendrickson addressed the issue of B9 housing and stated it is a legal issue. He further stated that the SEPA rules are clear that socio-economic or social policy issues are not a part of the review,and that the only relevance in a SEPA context is to identify whether or not there is high,middle or low income housing,which had been done in the checklist. Mark Jacobs, 2101 112th Avenue NE,#100,Bellevue, Washington 98004, applicant's traffic engineer, explained their traffic study, including trip generation methodology,peak hour calculations,regional growth factors, level of service at nearby intersections. In response to cross-examination,he explained the level of service impacts from I-405 to this area. Ishbel Dickens, 1021 NE 70th Street, Seattle,Washington 98115, discussed particular policies of the Comprehensive Plan relating to affordable housing and manufactured housing standards. Jennifer Henning, Senior Planner,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055, explained the history of the zoning on this site,as well as the SEPA process that was followed on this project. She further explained the ERC's role in the SEPA process,and the information they used to make their decision, including the geotech reports, departmental recommendations and contact with the school district. Ms. Henning was further cross-examined regarding such issues as the parking calculations and location of the aquifer protection zone and its recharge. Closing arguments were given by the parties and their comments reiterated their previous statements. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this appeal. There was no one else wishing to speak. The appeal hearing closed at 3:40 p.m. SEPA APPEAL FINDINGS.CONCLUSIONS&DECISION 1. The appellant,Roger Haynes,President of the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Owners Association, filed an appeal of a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M) issued by the ERC. Mr. Haynes,hereinafter the appellant,filed the appeal on October 19, 1998 and the appeal was filed in a timely manner. 2. The appellant and other mobile home owners live in mobile homes located on the subject site. The appellant was assisted in the presentation of the appeal by other residents of the mobile home park and for purposes of this appeal they are all considered appellants. 3. The applicant,John Wayland for Trammell Crow Residential,proposes developing a 17-building apartment complex with recreational building and pool on the property now occupied by the appellants' Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 5 mobile homes. All of the mobile homes, appellants' included,would have to be removed to accommodate the underlying applicant's new apartment complex. 4. For a description of the subject site,zoning and surrounding area,as well as a description of the proposal, see the Site Plan portion of this appeal included below. 5. The appellant alleged in the appeal that the Environmental Checklist prepared for the project was incomplete and misleading. 6. The following is a summary of the allegations. The alphanumeric tags at the end of each allegation are the Checklist reference numbers. a. Soils: The nature of the soils were not appropriately identified as unsuitable for foundation support but were listed as: native soils of silty sand and some gravel. (Blc) b. Soil stability: There have seen some slides but the applicant in replying to the history or evidence of unstable soils question,the response was: "No."(Bld) c. Grade and fill: The amount of grading and filling was requested and the applicant filled in 10,000 cubic yards onsite cut/fill whereas it appears that the amount is probably closer to 40,000 cubic yards and importation and exportation may be required. (B 1 e) d. Percentage of impervious surface: The appellants contend that the numbers do not accurately reflect current conditions as water can move freely underneath mobile homes which do not have full foundation walls. The numbers stated: Pre-project: 207,582 impervious and 258,174 pervious. Post-project: 233,352 impervious and 232,404 pervious. (Blg) e. Water: Three springs on the site should have been included but only Lake Washington is listed. The appellant also wanted more discussion on the impact of the aquifer.(B3a1) f. Plants: Blackberries on the banks will be removed for grading and routine vegetation management permit is needed for the property. (B4) g. Animals: Raccoons and deer were omitted as were sightings of eagles.(B5b) h. Noise: The noise of construction over 15 months was not listed. (B7b2) i. Land and shoreline uses: The applicant omitted identifying adjacent land uses. (B8a) j. Housing relocation: The appellant takes issue with information provided and insufficient funds to cover actual relocation. (B8k) k. Compatibility: They claim that Friends of Youth,the adjacent use to the north is incompatible with high income rental uses.(B81) 1. Housing/Income values: Disparity between housing proposed,described as middle and high and the housing that would be lost,described as low and medium and characterization of the mobile home complex. (B9a/b) Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 6 m. Recreation: The bike trail was omitted from description and the dangerous crossing and additional traffic was not discussed.(B 12) n. Transportation: The allegation was that there was insufficient consideration of the impact on I- 405; the extra parking encouraging more travel trips;the nearby commuter rail line was not considered;the numbers of trips under current conditions and zoning were not correct;the future plans were not projected realistically over 20 years and did not account for Bluffs, Labrador or Quendall traffic impacts; and one traffic study on June 2, 1998 is inadequate. (B 14) o. Public services. School capacity was not addressed. (B15) 7. The applicant supplemented the Environmental Checklist with a series of additional reports. One item is the GeoTech Consultants Inc.report of June 18, 1998 which contains information on soils,borings and slide potential. The second item is Preliminary Technical Information Report for Tamaron Pointe Apartments. This contains information on current storm drainage and proposed conditions including information on the drainage basin in which the subject site is located. Two traffic reports also supplemented the information submitted to the City. One traffic report was prepared for this project (Transportation Planning&Engineering,Inc.,June 1998)and another prepared for the nearby Labrador Preliminary Plat(Transportation Consulting Northwest, September 1998). 8. First,the checklist asks for general soil types,but even that information is supplemented by the geotechnical report. The geotechnical report explains the nature of the excavation proposed and the amount of materials that would be moved,exported and imported. It also contains information on the nature of the native and underlying soils,why the formerly disturbed soils should be removed and methods for applying the new fill materials. Those old fill soils appear to contain disturbed soils as well as some quantities of organic materials,possible tree and or shrub constituents scraped and deposited when the "terrace"was leveled. The report has specific information on how to prepare foundations and alternative methods of developing the site if the poor soils were not removed and replaced. The report has analysis of the slopes along Lake Washington Boulevard and the east property line. The amount of materials to be imported and exported may still vary as the City has asked that the entrance drive be realigned. 9. The geotechnical report makes it clear that the site was already regraded a number of years ago with soils borrowed from the steep east slope used to level the interior of the site and create a more gentle central area upon which the current mobile home park is developed. There is also information about a shallow slide and slide potential. 10. As proposed by the applicant,the site would be restored to generally approximate the current topography with some changes to accommodate the proposed building layout. In other words,the applicant in general is replacing unsound soils for sound buildable soils,but not doing any major topographic alterations. 11. The "drainage"technical report explains the current conditions and the post development conditions. The appellant alleges that the mobile homes do not sit directly on the ground and,therefore, storm water can percolate into the soils underneath the mobile homes that is not covered by concrete. The information uses standard methodology for calculating the current permeability including the mobile home pads. It contains information on the drainage basin and methods of conveying storm water and Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 7 any springs through and around the proposed development. Water quality,an aquifer protection concern,will be preserved by having a large bioswale located at the southwest corner of the site. It appears that if piles are used for foundation support they will not penetrate any drinking water aquifer. 12. The applicant has applied for a variance to remove vegetation from the bank along Lake Washington Boulevard including the blackberries the applicant has noted in the appeal. A routine vegetation management permit is not required when removal occurs incident to other construction permits. In addition, it is clear that a large portion of the site will be disturbed for development and will be relandscaped. The applicant does not propose disturbing the steeper portions of the east slope. The failure to note a permit that might be required is not a large omission, and in fact,the permit is not required in any event. 13. The Checklist contains information on the general animal population and may have omitted some types of animals. No threatened or endangered species nor dens or nests of such species were found on the site. 14. All construction is subject to both City and State noise regulations. While the noise generated may be disturbing,there is no expectation that it will be unusual given the nature of the proposed development. If deeper piles are necessary for foundation work the applicant would use a boring technique. 15. The Checklist does not have information on surrounding uses but the application submitted by the applicant has that information. The ERC has that information. The two technical reports describe the vicinity in which the subject site located, as does the traffic report. The appellant believes that the projects proposed or existing should have been listed with their unit count. Labrador Preliminary Plat would generate 66 single family homes,while Marina Landing has 184 units and the Bluffs which was approved and is being re-reviewed,has 165 units. The City and ERC had this information. 16. The Checklist does contain information on the number of housing units that will be replaced and the applicant's effort at relocation assistance. It shows that the 92 mobile homes and managers'residence housing approximately 210 people would be dislocated by the redevelopment. There is not a lot of socio-economic information in the Checklist nor other materials. 17. The Friends of Youth home is a residence for young adults who have had trouble but are considered low risk and who are being reintroduced back into the community. The appellant believes they serve an intrusive,possibly criminal, issue which should be reviewed. No one suggested that there were any extant problems in this regard. 18. The Checklist notes the income levels of the proposed residents and estimated those of the trailer park residents. 19. The bike path's omission from the Checklist does not appear to be a major oversight. The City has a Comprehensive Plan and its Park's plan notes the trail system in the City. The ERC is aware of the Comprehensive Plan. The current driveways already cross the path as does the access for the adjacent Marina Landing complex. 20. The two traffic reports prepared by different consultants bolster one another on traffic counts made on different days. The appellant believes that the current population,a substantially older population,does not generate as much traffic as shown in the report. The report used standard transportation generation factors. In addition,there is nothing which limits the mobile home to this possibly less mobile Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 8 clientele. The current development is projected to generate approximately 4.81 trips/unit or 443 trips/day. The appellant suggests that the number of trips should be approximately 246. The new project will generate approximately 1,226 trips. The peak hour traffic numbers,those considered most important in analyzing the impacts of developments on the level of service(LOS), show that if the appellant's alternative methodology and numbers were used,that there would be a difference of four(4) trips per peak. The LOS is anticipated to remain at A which is the best condition for intersections. The report did not analyze Port Quendall, but did project a 5%growth rate for the corridor. The City claims that the current LOS for the Lake Washington corridor does not merit widening of that street. The City wants it to stay a low traffic arterial street. 21. The Renton School District has reported that it has capacity in its system for additional students. The capacity of one school is apparently not considered critical to the system. 22. In addition to the specific allegation regarding the insufficiency of the checklist and environmental analysis,the appellants first objected that all of the residents did not receive notice as required by Code. They claim that all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site should have received mailed notice but that residents of the complex did not receive notice. It appears that the mobile home owners are not considered property owners as defined in Code. Generally,the notice provision has been interpreted to mean real property owners,those that own land,within 300 feet of the subject site. Whether the owners of mobile homes should have received such notice or not, it appears that most, if not all of them had notice of the proposed actions. The property and vicinity was posted,there was notice in the newspaper and it appears that the information was distributed within the complex. Further,the residents had received the appropriate legal notification required by State law regarding the conversion of the mobile home park to another use requiring vacation. It does not appear that they were unfairly deprived of an opportunity to appear and present their views on either the SEPA Administrative Appeal or the underlying land use actions,the Site Plan and Variance. 23. The City and applicant both accepted the consequences of the appellants' challenge to the legal notice and agreed to proceed with the hearing. If the notice were found to be defective by a court down the line,the proposal would be delayed accordingly. This office found that the notice was more than sufficient and that the appellants and other residents of the mobile home park had sufficient notice to fairly appear and contest the proposal. 24. All Findings from the Site Plan decision are incorporated into this decision. 25. This office believes that it should also separately address, in a more detailed fashion,the appellant's allegations regarding the insufficient review of the displacement consequences. The appellants allege that the displacement of low income households is not adequately discussed and the current mitigation is insufficient. They did show that it will create hardships for residents. The applicant is voluntarily providing a consultant's assistance is determining available resources for relocation,but is not legally required to do more. SEPA is constrained in its ability to do socio-economic analysis of impacts by court decisions and legislative actions. In addition,since the applicant is not responsible economically for relocation or expenses incurred,no mitigation of such consequences can be imposed on the applicant and discussion of such factors would not disclose issues that an applicant is responsible to mitigate. The residents did sign lease agreements that contain warnings of some kind putting residents on notice the the potential exists for them to have to leave the site. Clearly,this does not change the fact that dislocation of this population or certain members of this population will have impacts. But it is also clear that the applicant is entitled to redevelop the site,and SEPA alone does not require special mitigation. This office will not attempt to underplay the impact of the dislocation of the existing Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 9 residents. It will probably be brutal for some of them to find suitable locations for their existing homes or affordable replacement housing of any kind. But it is not something that can be adequately addressed by"simple" SEPA analysis. The State has intervened with legislation and guarantees,but the applicant is not responsible for further mitigation other than providing appropriate notice of impending change. The fact is the underlying property is separately owned and those owners are entitled to redevelop the subject site. This office can only join the appellants in urging the City and other agencies to provide whatever assistance is possible and for the applicant to provide as much flexibility as they can afford in timing the closure of the mobile home park. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The decision of the governmental agency acting as the responsible official is entitled to substantial weight. Therefore,the determination of the Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, is entitled to be maintained unless the appellant clearly demonstrates that the determination was in error. 2. The Determination of Significance in this case is entitled to substantial weight and will not be reversed or modified unless it can be found that the decision is "clearly erroneous." (Hayden v. Port Townsend, 93 Wn 2nd 870, 880; 1980). The court in citing Norway Hill Preservation and Protection Association v. King County Council, 87 Wn 2d 267,274; 1976, stated: "A finding is'clearly erroneous'when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Therefore,the determination of the ERC will not be modified or reversed if it can meet the above test. For reasons enumerated below,the decision of the ERC is affirmed. 3. The clearly erroneous test has generally been applied when an action results in a DNS since the test is less demanding on the appellant. The reason is that SEPA requires a thorough examination of the environmental consequences of an action. The courts have,therefore,made it easier to reverse a DNS. A second test,the "arbitrary and capricious"test is generally applied when a determination of significance(DS)is issued. In this second test an appellant would have to show that the decision clearly flies in the face of reason since a DS is more protective of the environment since it results in the preparation of a full disclosure document,an Environmental Impact Statement. 4. An action is determined to have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the environment if more than a moderate impact on the quality of the environment is a reasonable probability. (Norway, at 278). Since the Court spoke in Norway,WAC 197-11-794 has been adopted, it defines "significant" as follows: Significant. (1) "Significant" as used in SEPA means a reasonable likelihood of more than a moderate adverse impact on environmental quality. (2) Significance involves context and intensity. . .Intensity depends on the magnitude and duration of an impact. . .The severity of the impact should be weighed along with the likelihood of its occurrence. An impact may be significant if its chance of occurrence is not great,but the resulting environmental impact would be severe if it occurred. 5. Also redefined since the Norway decision was the term "probable." Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 10 Probable. "Probable" means likely or reasonably likely to occur, ...Probable is used to distinguish likely impacts from those that merely have a possibility of occurring,but are remote or speculative. (WAC 197-11-782) 6. The area has been changing for a number of years, starting with expansion of Coulon Park, followed by the greater populations coming to the area due to the park,and then Marina Landing was constructed. The subject site has been rezoned for a number of years with the elimination of the Trailer Park Zoning over ten years ago. The Comprehensive Plan and new Zoning were adopted in the last five years. The Bluffs,while not developed, has been approved for a number of years and a modified version is being reviewed by the City at this time. The site was substantially regraded years ago and the soils on the site have already been disturbed. In total, it is clear that there will be changes and impacts but they do not appear to be more than moderate given the current state of the area and the site itself. 7. Impacts and changes are not all significant in terms of environmental analysis. As noted above, it depends on the proposal and the context. The grading and filling in some circumstances might have an immense impact on the environment. But in this case,there will only be moderate changes to the actual topography. The applicant has proposed to remove unsuitable soils and replace them with soils suitable for a foundation. Moving a lot of earth alone does not necessarily demonstrate impact requiring EIS. The appellants believe that "recreating"new steep slopes after the "loose" inappropriate fill is removed is improper. That is a judgment call. It certainly is not an impact to recreate existing contours,not if engineering specifications are followed. No particular environmental impacts were identified with doing this. Would an EIS disclose more than is already contained in the information provided in the geotechnical studies? Probably not. 8. It appears that any slope or soil instability has been accounted for in the geotechnical reports. Ground water, percolation,diversion,detention and treatment of water and storm water and aquifer protection issues all appear to have been studied or noted in the checklist and supporting documents. There is a water quality swale located at the south end of the site that will be approximately 165 feet long and approximately 12 feet wide. It will be lined to prevent seepage that could either undermine the slopes or permit contaminated water from entering the aquifer. The bioswale is designed for cleansing the water. Detention is required under City regulations. Flows on to the site from the east will be collected and conveyed by pipes around and through the development. The City's aquifer specialist did not address quantity or recharge but only quality of storm water. 9. It appears from the traffic analysis,even using factors less favorable to the proposal,that the streets and critical intersections work at the best LOS and will continue to do so even with the proposed development and with other anticipated development in this corridor. The Quendall project, if approved, is still some years off,and is located a mile or so north of the subject site, immediately adjacent to an I-405 interchange. 10. Ambient noise of residents in a new development as well as the normal noise associated with construction are not unusual. Any construction project has impacts on its surroundings including temporary impacts on surrounding streets, sidewalks and bike paths. As noted,there are already crossings of the bike path by the existing complex. There was no evidence that any of these aspects of the proposal will have untoward impacts on the quality of the environment. 11. The appellants are looking for a full EIS to uncover missing facts. They believe that the current information compiled for the project is either incomplete or erroneous. That does not appear to be the Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.:LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 11 case. The application, checklist, supplemental reports and other submissions provide a wide range of information which allowed the ERC to reach the conclusions they did. 12. It is clear that the appellants have a sincere belief that the City's SEPA determination is erroneous. Unfortunately sincere beliefs have to be bolstered by factual evidence that the determination is erroneous. The appellant failed to introduce much in the way of factual evidence to show that the City's determination was erroneous. In the absence of such fact,compelling or otherwise, it is extremely difficult to agree with the appellant that a mistake was made. 13. Even using the relaxed standard that leans toward upholding a challenge to a DNS,the appellant has failed to persuade this office that the determination was based on other than a thorough analysis. 14. The reviewing body should not substitute its judgment for that of the original body with expertise in the matter,unless the reviewing body has the firm conviction that a mistake has been made. No such conviction results from hearing this case. Therefore,the determination below must be affirmed. 15. In conclusion,the appellant's arguments and case are not convincing that the proposal will have more than a moderate impact on the quality of the environment. In this case the preparation of an EIS that was specifically scoped to the critical geotechnical and traffic issues would probably not reveal substantially more information than currently can be found in the existing record. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required. DECISION: The determination of the Environmental Review Committee is affirmed and the appeal is denied. MINUTES: SITE PLAN and VARIANCE The jollowing minutes are a summary of the October 27, 1998 site plan hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,October 27, 1998,at 3:55 p.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Because of time constraints,Mr. Galvin,Mr.Hopkins and Mr. Wagner testified regarding the site plan during the appeal portion of the hearing. Their comments appear later in the minutes. The site plan hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by JENNIFER HENNING,Project Manager,Development Services,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant requests site plan approval and variance in order to develop the site into 17 residential and one recreation structures. The dwelling unit structures would be three stories or three stories plus a basement and would yield 182 dwelling units. The site plan also features a swimming pool, a tot lot,detached garages and parking for 372 vehicles. The site is located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard across from Gene Coulon Park and is approximately 10.69 acres in size. It is presently developed as a mobile home park with 92 existing homes, all of which would be removed. Various styles of structures are proposed,and they will be 34 feet to 40 feet 10 inches in height. The total floor area of the residential structures totals approximately 305,000 square feet,and 2,550 square feet in the recreation center. The site is designed with three tiers of structures from front to back,the recreation center is located in the center, and the tot lot is placed at the north Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 12 end of the site. The access to the site is from Lake Washington Boulevard via two existing driveways. The main entrance is at the south portion of the site and will be a gated access. The second driveway at the north end of the site is for egress and emergency access only. Staff is recommending that the north driveway be realigned to either a 90 degree angle with Lake Washington Boulevard or an angle between 45 and 90 degrees that is acceptable. Extensive grading is required to support the proposed building foundations and the street improvements. This project requires a shoreline substantial development permit because a small portion at the south of the site falls within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the parking and loading ordinance in order to provide just over two parking spaces per unit. The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated,and the mitigation measures include payment of fire,traffic and parks mitigation fees,and adherence to the geotech study that was submitted. This site is zoned and designated Residential Multi-Family-Infill(RMI)in the Comprehensive Plan(CP) land use designation.,and several policies were detailed which relate to the project's conformance or compliance with the CP policies and elements. In many instances the policies addressing manufactured housing cannot be applied to this proposal because the site is not designated as manufactured housing nor is it zoned for that. The zone permits a density of 10 minimum to 20 maximum net units to the acre. This proposal could accommodate a minimum of 19.4 dwelling units or a maximum of 182.8 dwelling units. Adjacent zoning is single family residential to the north and east and multi-family to the south. The required setbacks are met with this proposal, except a portion along the east and north boundaries where some development is proposed such as surface parking or circulation. Height limits in the zone are 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet; however,the applicant is permitted to request additional stories and up to 10 additional feet in height if they provide additional amenities such as pitched roofs, additional recreation facilities,underground parking,and/or additional landscaped open space areas. Applicant is requesting two parking spaces per unit and this requires a modification to the parking and loading ordinance which has not yet been granted. The applicant has also requested a variance from the land clearing and tree cutting ordinance in order to clear and grade on the western portion of the property to remove unsuitable fill material,to construct code-required street improvements and to support the building foundations. The steep slopes to the east would be avoided and existing vegetation on those slopes would not be disturbed. The view obstruction issue was addressed as well as the noise and glare,and aquifer protection area and its requirements. The landscaping plan was also detailed. Additional pedestrian access has been requested by staff from the north end of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. Staff recommends approval of the site plan and variance with the following conditions: (1)compliance with the mitigation measures of the ERC; (2)realigning the northern driveway; (3)revision of the site plan to provide the minimum 20 foot wide traffic aisle;(4)establishment of a Native Growth Protection Easement on the steep slopes of the site; (5)provision of a pedestrian access on the north portion of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard;(6)provision of a site lighting plan. Regarding the view obstruction concerns of the adjacent property owners, staff would recommend appropriate landscaping substitutions. Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 13 John Wayland.4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,Kirkland, Washington 98033,applicant herein, stated that they had no problem substituting species of trees as requested by adjacent property owners. He also outlined their revised hours of construction. Greg Diener, 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300, Seattle, Washington 98188,applicant representative herein, stated that there would be no disturbance within the 40%area of the eastern steep slopes. He also indicated the location of the rockeries on the site, and addressed the issue of slippage on the slope. Phil Rutledge, 19336 47th Avenue NE, Seattle,Washington 98155,applicant architect herein, addressed the height issue,explaining the sight line from the homes on the adjacent hill to the different buildings on site. He also discussed the heights of the various proposed buildings and displayed various colored renditions of the overall project. Richard Galvin,2407 Garden Court N,Renton,Washington 98056,an adjacent property owner to the east, addressed the problem of the current storm water runoff. He also questioned the building heights being proposed and their impact on adjacent property,and the lack of any information on the proposed lighting for the project. Richard Wagner,2411 Garden Court N,Renton,Washington 98056, addressed the issues of required parking stalls and the need for adequate on-site parking. In order to protect his views in the future,Mr. Wagner requested that the landscape plan be revised to plant trees which will not grow to a view-obscuring height. Several other issues were brought up by Mr. Wagner, including the accuracy of the height calculations, removal of aged cottonwoods from the site,hours of construction, location of dumpsters,and type and location of lighting. Gary Palmer, 2507 Park Place N,Renton,Washington 98056,an adjacent property owner, stated his concerns regarding the height of the buildings and the obstruction of his view. He was also concerned with the noise to be generated from the proposed parking lot which is just below his residence,as well as the possible trespass onto his property from this project. Richard Hopkins,2511 Park Place N,Renton, Washington 98056, entered a drawing showing the location of his property to the site. He is concerned about the excavation to be done to the northeast corner of the site to support the parking lots because of the steepness of the slope. He also expressed his concerns about the proposed landscaping as well as having the cottonwoods removed,the increase of traffic and the potential loss of view. Bill Barlow,2100 Lake Washington Boulevard,#91,Renton,Washington 98056, stated his objections to the proposal and suggested that there were things the developer could do without the variances and still accommodate a multi-family residential facility. Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055, discussed the street and bicycle lane and the required street improvements for this project. He further explained the drainage system on the site and the required water quality treatment for the proposed development. Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 14 SITE PL FINDINGS.CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,John Wayland for Trammell Crow Residential,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for an apartment complex together with a variance to remove vegetation from a steep slope. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard. The subject site is located on the east side of the boulevard immediately east of the north half of Gene Coulon Park. 6. The site currently houses the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park. The mobile home park would be replaced with the proposed apartment complex. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinances 1791, 1800 and 1804 enacted in September 1959,October 1959 and December 1959,respectively. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of multiple family uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. The plan was adopted after public hearing in June 1993. 9. The subject site was reclassified to its current RM-I(Multiple Family Residential Infill)with the adoption of Ordinance 4456 enacted in June 1994. 10. As noted,a mobile home park containing 92 mobile homes would be removed to allow the site to be developed. Many of the residents of that complex either object to the conversion of the complex or are concerned about where they will relocate. It appears that assistance complying with regulations will be provided but it may not cover all expenses. The Site Plan approval process only considers the criteria found in the City's regulations and analyzes the proposed development and not the impacts of what might be replaced by a new proposal. A SEPA appeal filed by residents of the mobile home park is reviewed in a separate part of this report. 11. The site sits on a bank located above Lake Washington Boulevard. The main portion of the site is relatively level. Steep slopes ranging from approximately 40%to 70%are located at the east and west edges of the site. There is also a steep bank in the center of the site. Ignoring the steeper slopes,the majority of the site is generally highest in the northeast corner and slopes down both to the west and south. Above the eastern slopes are single family homes along Garden and Park. Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 15 12. The applicant proposes constructing a complex with 182 multiple family dwelling units. There will be 18 buildings-- 17 separate apartment buildings and one recreational building. 13. There will be six building types or floor plans. There will be two Type A buildings; Building 8 in the center of the site and Building 14 in the northeast corner of the site. These are the largest,bulk-wise, of the buildings. They will each be 3 stories over a basement and be 40 feet, 10 inches tall. They each have a footprint of 11,082 square feet and each will contain 28 normal apartments. The actual height with peak of the two tallest buildings,Buildings 8 and 14 will be approximately 47 feet tall or about 6 or 7 feet above the height calculated using code formulas. Other peaked buildings will be similarly taller than the calculated heights. 14. All of the other buildings on the site will be townhouse units. Building 4 will be a Type B building. It is located along the southern portion of the east property line. Its footprint is 7,616 square feet. It will be 3 stories or 34 feet tall. It will house 6 units. 15. There will be seven Type C building which has a footprint of 11,770 square feet. It will also be 34 feet or 3 stories tall. Six of the buildings along the Lake Washington Boulevard frontage will be Type C buildings. The seventh will be located in the north portion of the east property line. Buildings 3, 7,9, 11, 15 and 17 will be Type C. It will house 8 units. 16. Three, 3-story Type D buildings each with a footprint of 10,082 square feet will be located along the east property line and in the north central portion of the site. These buildings will be 34 feet tall. Buildings 2, 6 and 10 will be Type D and will house 8 units. 17. Buildings 1, 5 and 12 will be Type E buildings. They will each have a footprint of 14,646 square feet and be 34 feet tall. There will be two of these buildings along the Lake Washington frontage and one located in the center of the east property line. It will house 10 units. 18. The last residential building type is Type F. It contains a footprint of 12,568 square feet and will be 34 feet tall. Building 16 will be the only one of this type and it will be located in the north central portion of the site. It will house 10 units. 19. The seventeen buildings are arrayed across the site in a two and three tier pattern. There will be 8 buildings along the Lake Washington Boulevard. Seven of them are oriented with their long facades facing the street and lake. The eighth building at the northwest corner of the site will be oriented with its short dimension facing the street. Where the subject site widens in the center of the site,there will be three tiers of buildings,whereas at the north and south ends of the site there will be two tiers of buildings. 20. The buildings will generally take advantage of the terrain differences on the site and step down to the west and south. While the buildings will be stepped into the site,some of the buildings will reduce and block views the homes upslope now have. The existing mobile homes are low-rise whereas the new buildings will range up to approximately 47 feet at their peaks. 21. The proposal requires a minimum of 1.75 parking stalls per unit or 319 stalls for the 182 units. The applicant has proposed parking for 372 vehicles which is 53 additional stalls. This request is being reviewed by the Administrator as a parking modification. The tandem parking must also be approved. There would be parking for 144 vehicles in one and two-car garages. The remaining 228 stalls would be surface parking in a mix of open stalls and carports. The applicant proposed 80 stalls in a tandem Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 16 arrangement,meaning that the second of two cars would block the first car. Carport/garages would be located in the northeast corner of the site and along the center of the east side of the complex. 22. Circulation will be handled by 20 feet aisles which widen to 24 feet where 90 degree parking stalls are located. The entry driveway will have to meet Fire Department standards. The site will be served by a gated, landscaped,double aisle entrance at the south side of the site and a second access at the northern end of the site. The applicant originally proposed that the north entrance follow the current access. Staff has determined that the access needs to be realigned to provide a more standard,approximately right angle intersection with Lake Washington Boulevard. 23. This proposal is subject to a 25 foot setback along its north and east property lines where it abuts residential uses. There is a setback intrusion near the northeast corner of the site which will need to be rectified. The property observes a 20 foot setback from Lake Washington Boulevard. Lot coverage for buildings is permitted to be 35%and the applicant proposes approximately 21%coverage. 24. The RM-I zone permits buildings of 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet. The applicant has proposed a mix of buildings that are three stories or 40 feet 10 inches tall. Taller buildings may be permitted by the Site Plan review process if the applicant provides additional amenities such as pitched roofs, additional recreation or underground parking and the height increase is compatible with adjacent residential development. 25. The buildings are designed with modulations in their facades,a series of open stairwells,terraces,and pitched roofs with offset dormers. Some of the buildings step into the slope on their uphill side. 26. There will be a one-story master recreation building and swimming pool in the center of the site and a tot lot in the north central portion of the site. A central greenspace will surround the tot lot. There will also be an overlook at the western edge of the site connected by a path to the pool area. A pedestrian path broken by parking stalls connects the site through the south driveway to the street and Coulon Park. Staff has recommended a second pathway down the north driveway to connect to the bike and walking path on Lake Washington Boulevard. The Police Department has recommended a second tot lot at the south end of the site. 27. Code requires a net density of between 10 and 20 units per acre. After subtracting the sensitive, steep slope areas of 1.55 acres,the applicant has proposed a density of 19.91 units per acre. 28. The entire site will be landscaped with a variety of trees, shrubs and ground cover. The applicant will generally not be altering the eastern steep slope. Staff has recommended a native growth protection easement to preserve these slopes. The applicant has proposed taller tree species along the eastern edge of the developed area. 29. In order to provide the appropriate frontage improvements as well as driveway realignment staff has required for the north driveway,the applicant would have to remove vegetation from steep slope areas along Lake Washington Boulevard. Such removal requires a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. The applicant has applied for the variance. 30. Similarly,the improvements along Lake Washington will require grading of the already existing steep slopes. In addition,the applicant has proposed to modify the old,underlying fill materials that were placed on the site years ago to provide the relatively level central areas. It appears those materials were borrowed from the steeper eastern slopes and redistributed to create the more gentle topography now Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 17 seen on the site. The geotechnical report indicates that these old fills contain some organic constituents and were not compacted well as they were moved around the site. The applicant proposes removing those materials and replacing them with sound fill,placed and compacted in a sound manner. The applicant could also redevelop the site using a different foundation method of deeper piles driven down to sound materials. The applicant proposes replacing all vegetation that is removed with landscaping materials suitable for steep slopes. 31. As noted above, staff has recommended that the eastern slopes be protected under a native growth protection easement. The applicant has proposed some modest grading work at the very western edge of the toe of the eastern slope. Some two to four foot rockeries would be created where some material would be removed to accommodate parking and stabilize these edges. The geotechnical engineer has recommended that no work be done to affect any areas over about 3 to 4 feet. 32. In addition to the concerns of the current mobile home park residents about their dislocation(discussed more fully in the appeal section of this report),the residents of the single family homes upslope from the subject site are concerned about loss of view,noise from the project and the large number of vehicles and the carports located immediately below them,the height of landscaping materials and light and glare from lighting on the site. They are also concerned about any issues affecting the stability of the steep slopes located between the subject site and their properties. CONCLUSIONS: Variance 1. It seems appropriate to address the variance first as it may affect other development issues for the subject site. Variances may be granted when the property generally satisfies all the conditions described in part below: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as:the size, shape, topography,or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity;and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested. 2. The applicant appears to suffer undue hardship due to the existing topography and unsuitable soils coupled with the existing substandard access driveway. The site was carved out of a steep hillside years ago and this redistribution of materials left a very steep bank along Lake Washington Boulevard and uncompacted and inappropriate subsoils. Also the driveway intersects the boulevard at an unsafe angle that should be rectified whether this site is redeveloped or not. To allow reasonable redevelopment of the site and to provide a safe driveway intersection,the vegetation needs to be Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 18 removed and this appears reasonable. The removal of inappropriate soils and the redepositing of appropriate fill on the other portions also allows the applicant to reasonably redevelop the subject site as envisioned by the zoning and Comprehensive Plan. 3. Approval of the variance does not appear to materially harm either the public or surrounding property. The variance will only affect the site. It will provide the applicant the opportunity to provide a safer intersection with the street and the bike path and provide standard street improvements which will make for a safer overall roadway. 4. Variances have been approved for other properties that have steep slopes which need to be breached for access or street improvements. Some of the adjacent sites were developed or redeveloped prior to the adoption of the Land Clearing Ordinance. Approving the variance will allow this applicant to develop the subject site as other properties in this vicinity have been developed. 5. The variance appears to be the minimum necessary to provide for both the street improvements and site development. All vegetation that is removed will be replaced with suitable vegetation for steep slopes. 6. In conclusion,a variance is necessary for the appropriate development of the site and the frontage along Lake Washington Boulevard. Site Plan 7. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 8. The proposed apartment complex is compatible with the Multiple Family Residential Infill designation found in the Comprehensive Plan. It is also compatible with the various goals and policies for the type of development the City is encouraging,although clearly it will not be without impacts. It will be displacing uses that have served well for low income housing,there will be additional traffic, and there will be additional noise emanating from the subject site. Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 19 9. The proposal complies with the Zoning Code in all particulars except the special setbacks in the northeast corner of the site and the basic height limits of the RM-I zone. The applicant will have to remove any intrusions into required setbacks and provide appropriate landscaping in those areas. The height limits will be discussed below. It meets the other front yard and yard standards. Building Code compliance will be determined with the submission of a permit. The applicant will have to alter the entryways,driveways and aisleways to comply with Fire Department requirements to provide for safe access and circulation for emergency vehicles. 10. In general,with the exception of intruding into the existing open views of the upslope neighbors,there should not be a substantial impact on surrounding properties and uses. Coulon Park will be the extended "backyard"of this complex and its residents can probably be expected to frequent the park increasing its usage. At least the residents, if not their guests,will be able to walk to the park. Traffic in the area will increase but local streets have an adequate level of service and should be able to handle the increased load. The alignment of the north driveway and its intersection with Lake Washington Boulevard is unsafe and will be worse with the additional traffic. The applicant shall realign the driveway subject to the approval of the City. The topography should generally screen the site from uses north and east of the site with the exception of the views being altered, and there will probably be the additional noise associated with the substantially increased traffic on the site and its parking located along the east bank of the site. To reduce these impacts,the applicant should provide carports with roofs along the eastern boundary of the site for all of those spaces now located between the garage in the northeast corner of the site and the two garages in the central eastern boundary. 11. The taller buildings and increased development will also bring with it more lighting on the site. The applicant shall develop a lighting plan that shall be subject to the approval of the City. Such plan shall minimize the spill of light up from the site and the applicant shall not"wash"buildings with light. 12. It does appear that proposed taller buildings create view impairment for some of the homes east of the subject site. What we have here is an example of the "law of unintended consequences." In order to make taller buildings more visually appealing the code suggests that they should be finished with peaked or pitched roofs. Peaked roofs extend the height of buildings and make them higher than a flat- roofed, uninteresting 3-story building would be. In addition,building height is measured from the average height taking into account the slope, so that the peak of the roof is usually higher than the stated value. In fact,while the two taller buildings are calculated to be 40'10"they will be between 47 and 48 feet tall. The smaller,34 foot buildings will probably approach 40 feet in height. In the instant case,all of the proposed buildings exceed the 2-1/2 story height limit and two buildings exceed the 35 foot height. The Code permits the additional height when an applicant provides amenities such as additional open space,recreation and pitched roofs. The cross-sections show that from one residence the loss would be of approximately 600 feet of lake surface. It appears that both the shorter,nominal 34 foot building and the nominal 40 foot building will both block the same amount of view. In this case, approving the additional height will adversely affect neighboring property. The amenities the applicant is proposing for being granted additional height do not help neighboring properties at all. Therefore,the applicant should regrade the site where buildings would intrude into existing views to reduce the grade by the amount that the pitched roofs are taller than the calculated heights. In some cases,this will mean that the applicant does not have to import as much material to replace the removed,old, unsuitable fill. 13. It appears that the project is well-designed internally with the buildings well spaced out and clearly maximizing the view potential of the site. The applicant should provide the additional sidewalk linkage proposed by staff from the north driveway to create a looped walking route through the site. In addition, as proposed by the Police Department, a second tot lot serving the southerly units should be Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 20 provided somewhere in the vicinity of Buildings 3,4,or 5. The police maintain it is safer for younger children to use play equipment near their residences. 14. The applicant should choose landscape materials that will not grow to harm the view of the upsiope neighbors and that will stabilize any steep slopes. Since the site is in the Aquifer Protection Area,the applicant should probably also pick landscape materials that require limited fertilizers and pesticides for maintenance. 15. The development,particularly if the grade is reduced somewhat, should not have an adverse impact on property values. 16. The internal roadway appears to provide for safe circulation patterns for residents. The width of these roadways and turning radii need to meet Fire Department requirements for their emergency equipment. In addition, since long stretches of the internal path cross parking stalls,the applicant should provide the second path down to the street from the north portion of the site, along the second driveway. 17. There should be adequate light and air provided to the site with the way the buildings are arranged. 18. The site is served by City infrastructure, and as noted,the roads serving the site have adequate levels of service for the new residents. 19. In conclusion,with some adjustments in grade and conditions to reduce light or landscaping impacts and to provide adequate ingress and egress,the proposed plan appears to be an appropriate redevelopment of the subject site. DECISION: The Site Plan and Variance are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of building permit; 2. The applicant shall modify the site plan to realign the driveway angle for the northernmost drive to either a 90-degree intersection with Lake Washington Boulevard,or an angle between 45 and 90 degrees that is acceptable to the City's Development Services Division and Transportation Systems Division. Approval of the revised driveway is required prior to the issuance of construction or building permits for the proposal. 3. The applicant shall modify the site plan for the primary ingress/egress drive to provide a minimum 20- foot width in both the traffic aisle and the gate opening area. Revisions to the site plan must be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction or building permits for the proposal. 4. The entry driveways, internal driveway aisles and turning radii shall be approved by the Fire Department. 5. The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement for the steep slope areas 40%and greater on the east portion of the site in order to protect the slopes from future disturbance. The Native Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 21 Growth Protection Easement shall be recorded against the title for the property prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian connection from the north end of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. The pedestrian connection shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the proposal. 7. The applicant shall submit a site lighting plan for the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction or building permits. Such plan shall minimize the spill of light up from the site and the applicant shall not"wash" buildings with light. 8. The setback intrusion near the northeast corner of the site shall be rectified. 9. The applicant shall provide a second tot lot in the vicinity of Buildings 3,4 or 5. 10. The applicant shall not disturb any of the steep easterly slopes over about 3 to 4 feet. All slope work shall be done according to City standards and done in consultation with a geotechnical engineer. 11. The applicant shall remove any intrusions into required setbacks and provide appropriate landscaping in those areas. 12. The applicant shall provide carports with roofs along the eastern boundary of the site for all of those spaces now located between the garage in the northeast corner of the site and the two garages in the central eastern boundary. 13. Where buildings would intrude into existing views,the applicant shall regrade the site to reduce the grade by the amount that the pitched roofs are taller than the calculated heights. 14. The applicant shall choose landscape materials that will not grow to harm the view of the upslope neighbors and that will stabilize any steep slopes. Since the site is in the Aquifer Protection Area,the applicant shall install landscape materials that require limited fertilizers and pesticides for maintenance. ORDERED THIS 23rd day of November, 1998. FRED J.KAUF "41( HEARING EXRINER TRANSMI 1TED THIS 23rd day of November, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren,City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V November 23, 1998 Page 22 Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev.Administrator South County Journal Parties of Record(see attached) Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 7. 1998, Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 19, 1998 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Request to Deviate from Parking Standards (File No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, V-H, SM, ECF) STAFF REPORT Summary of Request/Background. John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential, has applied to the City seeking to deviate from the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance. The applicant is requesting to be permitted to exceed the required amount of parking by 53.5 parking spaces. For the 182-unit apartment development, 318.5 parking stalls are required(1.75/unit). The applicant is proposing to meet and exceed this requirement by providing 372 parking stalls through a combination of garages, apron parking, and surface parking as follows: TYPE OF PARKING STALLS Townhome Apron Parking 113 Townhome Garage Parking (1 per unit) 126 Surface Parking (4 parallel stalls, 111 open stalls) 115 Free-standing garages (3 structures with 6 stalls each) 18 TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING 372 Stalls The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that multi-family residential developments and apartment houses provide 1.5 parking spaces for each unit. In addition, 1 guest parking space is required for every 4 dwelling units in multi-family developments with 5 units or more. The 182-unit Tamaron Pointe Apartments must provide 319 parking stalls (1.75 parking spaces x 182 units= 318.5 parking spaces required)according to the Parking Ordinance. A total of 372 stalls is proposed. Parking for 113 vehicles is available on aprons for the townhomes. Each of the 126 townhome units would have a garage stall under the building(126 stalls). Some of the townhouse units would have the potential for tandem parking within the garage, however this additional parking is not included in the parking counts. Three freestanding garage buildings would provide a total of 18 parking stalls located in close proximity to the two larger(stacked flat)apartment structures (Bldgs. 8 and 14). Surface parking that is available for residents and visitors would account for 115 spaces. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\98-123.JTH\PKGMOD.DOC November 19, 1998 Page 2 The Parking and Loading Ordinance states that tandem parking is permitted for single family and two- family dwellings. Tandem parking for multi-family dwellings greater than two units is not addressed. However,through Parking Modification requests,tandem parking has been permitted to count toward some of the required parking, as in the case of Plum Grove(Sector D of The Orchards). The applicant has requested to deviate from the Parking and Loading Ordinance. In order to be permitted a modification from the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance,the applicant must show that the proposal: 1) conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; and, 2) can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and, 3) will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies)in the vicinity; and, 4) will be made prior to detailed engineering and design. Each of these criteria is discussed below. 1). The proposal conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code, in that an adequate amount of parking would be provided to serve residents and guests of the multi-family residential development.. There are no opportunities available for overflow parking along the abutting public street, Lake Washington Boulevard. By allowing the applicant to exceed the parking requirement, off-site areas would be less likely to be impacted by overflow parking. 2). The applicant is justified in asking to exceed the parking requirement for the subject site. The applicant would provide approximately 2.0 parking stalls per multi-family residential unit. Parking would consist of garage spaces, apron parking, and surface parking stalls. Garage and tandem parking would be for the use of residents. Surface parking stalls would be available to visitors. Apron parking in front of a townhome would be for the exclusive use of the resident of the townhome, and their guests. Since there is a lack of overflow parking on the abutting street system and in the area, it is prudent for the applicant to request additional parking on-site for visitor and resident parking. In addition,the applicant's request assumes that tandem parking on aprons behind the garages is acceptable as satisfying a portion of the parking requirement. If the tandem parking was not counted toward the requirement,then the project would be providing only 259 of the required 319 parking stalls. And,the applicant would be seeking a modification from the parking standards to be permitted to provide less parking, and to be permitted to use 60 apron parking stalls toward the parking requirement. 3). The granting of the modification would reduce the likelihood that residents and guests would attempt to park off-site. The construction of the parking areas would not require that any grading be accomplished in the steep slope areas that are 40%slope or greater. However, one of the 6-car freestanding garages, and 5 surface parking stalls proposed to be located along the northeast boundary of the site would require cutting into the slope between the subject site and the Friends of Youth(Griffin Home)property. A 4 to 8-foot rockery is shown on the north side of this proposed parking area. A 5-foot rockery is shown on the north side of proposed Building 14, and on the south side of the vehicle circulation aisle. The rockeries would be still be needed for development of the circulation driveway and to establish finish floor elevations for Building 14. ` S November 19, 1998 Page 3 4). The applicant has requested the modification from the Parking and Loading standards prior to finalizing engineering and design plans. The Hearing Examiner's Decision on the SEPA appeal and Site Plan is expected within the next week. The proposal has not been approved, and if approved,the Examiner could assign conditions that require redesign of the project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the approval of the parking modification for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments in order to exceed the amount of required parking spaces on site, subject to the following condition. 1. If the decisionmakers approve fewer than 182 dwelling units on the subject site,the requested parking modification shall be revisited by the Department Administrator. cc: Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor I--:.•a---1 I ., • `? i; R41 m.e re,Ie. ''---- -----7- _-- 1.64 �' Few_ - __ ''l�lb'- T 'o .' j�d 1l44- } "'.t, -R Sump Oopo was -- _ Ct? "'• ` 4-��- a. II ?*�.� k, ► i• ,} . ot m :•m•. / 2 / 1....•.....4—._ i--i--i:_l.ig•"1/..i..1.t,..1414t, r-i—,\, . - 7.�\ i7i III, .ydl j '1 . t i;p,rt- r 0. ININ. . " ..•li if:i . . ...........-:. ------. t.-% • n• .41\**..,,,,04i4•4*** 4 fee::,."'". -....--.:: it, _ .4 •,...4111,-ap., .;;;,4,\ 4644, • ••• ''...1.... ''''13 • ..110. ....--.'... '''' *111701141118 l*Spiiplallikit .... " . . ' !Rik .111* -.Inirm.'7".‘1/4r°' -•••"°.°. ...."'.----‘..,-...7....--- ---C16",lar,:-......!._ 1#11114 0101,11ilt i........lc. t, i .,.., .....---WI,..S1 i It.k....•114,06 111* sr"."-`„:1,---- __ •,.. . ,.�` I- ' .�t1 ..... .... riat At Ilia lk��l��I ' •A ,^ •*! 111,„*".rl► • -/. '� d1i I f PARKINCs DATA \ :�`�• t �\iiiiiti . �I_� _ f •W r 0��� i---'... I' �/ REdREGU AR(10G: 3n �� ,. 1\ - - ' COMPACT(305.4.)Si . rr ' - REGULAR(10Rn' n2 713 -00 Q• ,�� ._,-,�___... �� ..�," �`i�i �1i , PARKaY PROVIDED ` I �'- f LANDSCAPE DATA REGULAR sac \` N � ���: -- - ' _ GARAGE: w .,\ f ���� • v.�.__' '. e.„,.., INTERIOR PARK"... 21640•r. RCP, Im I ` WEEP SLOPE OPEN SPACE: 69656.I, OPEN. Ill p OTNER LANDSCAPE AREA. 141}0l•.I. TOTAL REG. 325 • � \y�� ��I ' _ - SITE -� • TOTAL LANDSCAPE/OPEN SPACE 238.523./, COMPACT f 0.120 41 #,44•' , .� ��~ .. SI 1 E PLAN TOTAL PAR IHO 312 \�O�e'V ' DATE: 01•D-90 SCALE I•:50' .�,,q PARKING LANDSCAPE DATA: — ������ i/ lUE6 e'"^,�• PAPoCItYa AND DRIVEWAY: I2,191*I. R•1 lane e \ �'� • INTERIOR PARKING LAIDBCAPRG:21640•If W.) kS i • %�'.'' BUILDING MATRIX UNIT MATRIX (5"rogus.oQ) \` ` .- ,j BLDG TYPE P••rh1•t FL.Ind FL 2rd.RTOTAL ammo.. BLDG TTPE 58D•1 sec-1 98C-IL B50 1510 CIO CI5 TOTAL: I 'SITE PLAN DATA 1 E 3006 6030 5528146K 2462 1 E 0 2 ,`\yid'' 2 D .500 4560 4,422 10002 3660 2 D 6 2 8 ' 3 C 2458 4060 4.422 11.118 1.957 3 C 6 2 0 LOT COVERAGE DATA. 4 B 610 3690 3316 1.616 2.150 4 B 4 2 6 SITE AREA: 445656.I. 5 E 3088 6030 5.525 14646 2,462 5 C 6 7 8 SITEWILDING AREA(GROUND FLOORA 59,116•I. • a,1.". 6 D 000 4060 4.422 0002 3660 6 D 6 2 p 1 C 7488 tp60 4472 11,110 1,992 1 G i 7 I 0 LOT COVERAGE. 2128 (4110 able.355) / BLDG.COVERAGE MATRIX a A 5541 11052 11052 11002 36181 0 A _ 14 10 4 78 QMPER 1OIS SURFACE DATA. Type Bldg,Rock,No.•I 51 g. TOTAL 9 C 24pp 421b0 4,4I2 11,11m 1,592 5 E 8 7 10 BUILDING FOOTPRINT. 94116•I. 10 A 11082•I. 2 each 22,164•f. D 800 4p60 4422 1008i 3,660 10 D b 2 0 PATIOS!SIDEWALKS: 14.520..I. 8 B 3,400..l, leach 3.40d.1 , C 2,480 A860 4422 uric 1,992 II C 6 2 8 - C 4460.f 1 each 31360•1 Q E 3086 6030 5.52614.46 2462 Q M E 6 2 10 DRIVEWAYS•PARKG. 10.151•I. 13 C 2,4130 4.060 4422 I,liO 1592 U C 6 2 p -_ D 4,460•f. 3 esdr 13380•./. 14 A 5541 11082 11062 11,082 38,181 14 A (4 10 4 20 TOTS: 1481, 226033•I. E 5,550..I. 3 each I5B50•I B C 2488 4.860 4422 II,llO 1.992 BC 6 2 0 f15S•1bu,sbls) F 5,532•I. I each '5}32•!. 16 'r•'M 2,5500. 1 eed, 2}50•!. F 550 605m 5378 Q}60 4,542 16 F 0 2 10 SUB TOTAL9 18 Bid Il C 2,458 4}60 4422 11310 1.552 Il C 6 2 a - gg.�036•I b Ins are 2}50 TOTAL 28 20 8 66 30 20 10 102 Garage. 136m•f. se ch 400m•!. TOTAL 114362 E54r3320442., TOTAL Building Ceverege: 1551166f. FREE 5TANp6G GARAGE (3 each. alma; AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR N°^^•^^•••limning TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIALNoW No TAMARON POINTE rma•mwn r•b Al RENTON,YlASHINGTON 1,0„4,0-0„o f,,,,,,,,,I 01.2048 TCR Robert Hinnen TRAM\II'.I I CROW RESIDENTIAL DeVe/Opincnt itsiOclatt Pacific Northwest 2001 S.W.River Drive Portland,OR 97201 (503)952-7739 FAX(503)241-3462 November 10, 1999 Via Federal Express Ms. Jennifer Henning City of Renton City Hall, 6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Native Growth Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictions for Tamaron Pointe Apartment Community Dear Jennifer: Enclosed please find copies of the Native Growth Protection Easement and the Declaration of Restrictions that have revised legal descriptions attached. I am also enclosing copies of maps of the easement areas for the Native Growth Protection Easement and an ALTA survey of the property. Please let me know as soon as possible if these documents are acceptable and I will have the originals recorded. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Robert A. Hinnen Development Associate Enclosures Jennefer Toth Henning From: Duranleau, Gregg J To: Jennefer Toth Henning Subject: Tamaron Pointe Date: Friday, November 06, 1998 6:53AM Having recently read the article in the Renton Reporter, and being a resident of Kennydale, I'm concerned about the density of the development planned at the present Lake Terrace Mobile Park. The Renton Reporter article articulates my concerns as well: increased traffic, overcrowding of Kennydale Elementary, effects on groundwater run-off, are valid and realistic impacts to the local area which would lower the quality of life in the area as planned. Of most interest to me however, I thought that the Shoreline Protection Act restricted the height of buildings around the lake to 2 stories? Or at least I thought I remember a story told to me by a lifelong Seattlite about the development of highrise apartments on the shores of Lk. Wash. and how it was agreed that this was not a good thing for the lake or all the people who live on or around the lake. Why are we considering a three story development? Page 1 CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner November 4, 1998 Representative Velma Veloria PO Box 40400 Olympia, WA 98504-0600 Dear Representative Veloria: The City of Renton shares your concern about the relocation of the residents of Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park. This letter is an update on what is known about the residents of the park, and what has been accomplished to date. There are 92 spaces at the mobile home park. Of the 92, 14 are recreational vehicles. Of the 78 remaining mobile homes, 75 are owner occupied, and 28 have requested relocation assistance from the Relocation Specialist. In 1997, the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program served 6 clients, and in 1998 there are approximately 12 pending applications. The 18 households served were low/moderate income to qualify for the program. It is not known how many of the other households are low income, or are occupied by a senior citizen or disabled person. The other residents will not disclose household information to the different groups working with them. Dennis Conte, City of Renton's Housing Specialist, has been involved since early August, 1998, and helped organize a general meeting of the residents on August 25th at Griffin Home. The purpose of the general meeting was to inform residents of what was happening, and educate them on services available. Approximately 25 residents attended. Representatives from the following agencies provided information: Renton Housing Authority, Senior Housing Assistance Group, King County Housing Authority, Volunteer Center of United Way, and Lutheran Social Services. The Renton Housing Authority currently has no waiting list for older adults, so low-income older adults can move in immediately. There are waiting lists for individual Section 8 vouchers, and family housing. Royal Hills, a project-based Section 8 in Renton, is accepting applications for housing. Low-income residents who need critical emergency repairs are being encouraged to apply to the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program. If they qualify, critical repairs up to $1000 can be performed. Trammel Crow has hired a Relocation Specialist, Carol Warren, to assist residents (she is located on site). She has located 32 mobile home spots for residents. Many of the residents are reluctant to move, so they are losing available spaces due to their hesitancy. Dennis is also working with Carol on requests for services that the City cannot accommodate and service groups are being approached to help. Dennis attended a meeting on September 24t. The residents were interested in other property that might be considered for a mobile home park. Residents also were informed as to their first 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 / FAX(425)430-6523 Representative Velma Veloria 11/04/98 Page 2 right of refusal to purchase the property. One of the owners of the property has approached the City to consider the possibility of rezoning a parcel of land in the Renton Highlands in order to provide a new site for mobile homes in the City. The owner has met with the City, and is considering whether to apply for a rezone. The.last meeting Dennis attended was on October 8t. The homeowners association is filing for the first right of refusal. The residents are also discovering that the cost of relocating may exceed the reimbursement amount set by the State, under the Mobile Home Relocation Assistance Program. Residents are eligible for a maximum of$3500 for a singlewide mobile home and $7000 for a doublewide. Carol assists the residents in completing the application for reimbursement. Some of the residents do not have the savings to cover the cost of relocation, as the State reimburses for expenses and does not provide the money up front. A public hearing on the site plan and variance was held last week. The Hearing Examiner's decision will be issued in approximately three weeks after which there is an established appeal process. The City can not legally delay the project or alter the time frames for land use process. We certainly empathize with the residents regarding the stress, trauma, and inconvenience of relocating their homes. We will continue to work with Carol Warren and the residents to make the transition as easy as possible. Please feel free to call me at 425-430-6500 if you would like to discuss this matter further. 9,7cerely, Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: Jay Covington Jim Shepherd Renton City Council Members 'r - CITY OF RENTON Cis 'TTT,T;yi, 9y.eryir.i Jr.� Mayor Jesse Tanner November 4, 1998 Councilmember Rob McKenna Metropolitan King County Council 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Councilmember McKenna: The City of Renton shares your concern about the relocation of the residents of Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park. This letter is an update on what is known about the residents of the park, and what has been accomplished to date. There are 92 spaces at the mobile home park. Of the 92, 14 are recreational vehicles. Of the 78 remaining mobile homes, 75 are owner occupied, and 28 have requested relocation assistance from the Relocation Specialist. In 1997, the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program served 6 clients, and in 1998 there are approximately 12 pending applications. The 18 households served were low/moderate income to qualify for the program. It is not known how many of the other households are low income, or are occupied by a senior citizen or disabled person. The other residents will not disclose household information to the different groups working with them. Dennis Conte, City of Renton's Housing Specialist, has been involved since early August, 1998, and helped organize a general meeting of the residents on August 25th at Griffin Home. The purpose of the general meeting was to inform residents of what was happening, and educate them on services available. Approximately 25 residents attended. Representatives from the following agencies provided information: Renton Housing Authority, Senior Housing Assistance Group, King County Housing Authority, Volunteer Center of United Way, and Lutheran Social Services. The Renton Housing Authority currently has no waiting list for older adults, so low-income older adults can move in immediately. There are waiting lists for individual Section 8 vouchers, and family housing. Royal Hills, a project-based Section 8 in Renton, is accepting applications for housing. Low-income residents who need critical emergency repairs are being encouraged to apply to the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program. If they qualify, critical repairs up to $1000 can be performed. Trammel Crow has hired a Relocation Specialist, Carol Warren, to assist residents (she is located on site). She has located 32 mobile home spots for residents. Many of the residents are reluctant to move, so they are losing available spaces due to their hesitancy. Dennis is also working with Carol on requests for services that the City cannot accommodate and service groups are being approached to help. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(4251430-6523 Councilmember Rob McKenna 11/04/98 Page 2 Dennis attended a meeting on September 24t. The residents were interested in other property that might be considered for a mobile home park.Residents also were informed as to their first right of refusal to purchase the property. One of the owners of the property has approached the City to consider the possibility of rezoning a parcel of land in the Renton Highlands in order to provide a new site for mobile homes in the City. The owner has met with the City, and is considering whether to apply for a rezone. The last meeting Dennis attended was on October 8t. The homeowners association is filing for the first right of refusal. The residents are also discovering that the cost of relocating may exceed the reimbursement amount set by the State, under the Mobile Home Relocation Assistance Program. Residents are eligible for a maximum of$3500 for a singlewide mobile home and $7000 for a doublewide. Carol assists the residents in completing the application for reimbursement. Some of the residents do not have the savings to cover the cost of relocation, as the State reimburses for expenses and does not provide the money up front. A public hearing on the site plan and variance was held last week. The Hearing Examiner's decision will be issued in approximately three weeks after which there is an established appeal process. The City can not legally delay the project or alter the time frames for land use process. We certainly empathize with the residents regarding the stress, trauma, and inconvenience of relocating their homes. We will continue to work with Carol Warren and the residents to make the transition as easy as possible. Please feel free to call me at 425-430-6500 if you would like to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, 94e444. Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: Jay Covington Jim Shepherd Renton City Council Members CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 3, 1998 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments (File No. LUA-98-123, SA-H,V-H, SM,) Tamaron Pointe Apartments is a proposal by Trammell Crow Residential (TCR) for the 10.69 acre site located at 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard. As you are aware,the site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park,with 92 mobile homes within the park. TCR is proposing 182 apartment units in 17 structures, and a separate recreation center. Proposed buildings would feature three-story townhomes (two levels over a garage), or flats (three-stories plus basement). Building heights would range from 34 feet above finished grade for the townhomes,to approximately 41 feet (from finished grade to the mid-point of the pitched roof)for the flats. Townhome structures would have from 6 to 10 units in each building. Each of the two apartment flat structures would have 28 units. Parking would be accommodated entirely on-site,through a mix of garages under the townhomes, detached garages, apron parking, and surface parking areas. A parking modification has been requested in order to exceed the amount of required parking by approximately 50 stalls. The site has steep slopes on the east boundary, and these would be avoided. However,the steep slopes on the west portion of the site, and adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard,would be disturbed. These slopes are made up of unconsolidated fill material from the east portion of the site that was used as fill when the mobile home park was constructed. This fill can not support building foundations and is prone to sliding. Required street improvements and any site redevelopment require that these slopes be disturbed to remove the fill and either reinstall it or to replace it with imported structural fill. This would resolve the sliding of the unconsolidated material onto Lake Washington Boulevard. The applicant has requested a Variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance in order to clear the steep slopes so that grading could occur. Several issues have been raised during the comment period,and through the public hearing. These include: displacement of the mobile home park residents, increased traffic, storm water management, slope stability, view impacts, and density. The site is designated and zoned for multi-family dwellings at densities of 10 -20 dwelling units per acre. Proposed density is approximately 19.9 dwelling units per acre. \\TS SERVER\SYS2\COMMON\HADIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLANING\PROJECTS\98-123.TIMGRGZ.DOC • November 2, 1998 Page 2 Existing residents of the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park were given a one-year notice by TCR according to State law. Notice was given August 15th of this year. TCR also has contracted with a relocation consultant, Carol Warren,to assist residents in applying for relocation aid. This project was before the Hearing Examiner on Tuesday, October 27th. An appeal of the SEPA determination was also heard at that time. The Hearing Examiner's Decision is expected to be issued between November 17 and 24th. Staff on the project is Jennifer Henning. She can be reached at 430- 7286. ;, '-,T CITY OF RENTON .4 Mayor Jesse Tanner November 2, 1998 Senator Margarita Prentice 11111 Legislative District PO Box 40482 Olympia, WA 98504-0482 Dear Senator Prentice: The City of Renton shares your concern about the relocation of the residents of Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park. This letter is an update on what is known about the residents of the park, and what has been accomplished to date. There are 92 spaces at the mobile home park. Of the 92, 14 are recreational vehicles. Of the 78 remaining mobile homes, 75 are owner occupied, and 28 have requested relocation assistance from the Relocation Specialist. In 1997, the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program served 6 clients, and in 1998 there are approximately 12 pending applications. The 18 households served were low/moderate income to qualify for the program. It is not known how many of the other households are low income, or are occupied by a senior citizen or disabled person. The other residents will not disclose household information to the different groups working with them. Dennis Conte, City of Renton's Housing Specialist, has been involved since early August, 1998, and helped organize a general meeting of the residents on August 25th at Griffin Home. The purpose of the general meeting was to inform residents of what was happening, and educate them on services available. Approximately 25 residents attended. Representatives from the following agencies provided information: Renton Housing Authority, Senior Housing Assistance Group, King County Housing Authority, Volunteer Center of United Way, and Lutheran Social Services. The Renton Housing Authority currently has no waiting list for older adults, so low-income older adults can move in immediately. There are waiting lists for individual Section 8 vouchers, and family housing. Royal Hills, a project-based Section 8 in Renton, is accepting applications for housing. Low-income residents who need critical emergency repairs are being encouraged to apply to the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program. If they qualify, critical repairs up to $1000 can be performed. Trammel Crow has hired a Relocation Specialist, Carol Warren, to assist residents (she is located on site). She has located 32 mobile home spots for residents. Many of the residents are reluctant to move, so they are losing available spaces due to their hesitancy. Dennis is also working with Carol on requests for services that the City cannot accommodate and service groups are being approached to help. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton. Washington 9S055 - (4251410-6500 / FAX(425141(1-6571 Senator Margarita Prentice 11/04/98 Page 2 Dennis attended a meeting on September 24th. The residents were interested in other property that might be considered for a mobile home park. Residents also were informed as to their first right of refusal to purchase the property. One of the owners of the property has approached the City to consider the possibility of rezoning a parcel of land in the Renton Highlands in order to provide a new site for mobile homes in the City. The owner has met with the City, and is considering whether to apply for a rezone. The last meeting Dennis attended was on October 8t'. The homeowners association is filing for the first right of refusal. The residents are also discovering that the cost of relocating may exceed the reimbursement amount set by the State, under the Mobile Home Relocation Assistance Program. Residents are eligible for a maximum of$3500 for a singlewide mobile home and $7000 for a doublewide. Carol assists the residents in completing the application for reimbursement. Some of the residents do not have the savings to cover the cost of relocation, as the State reimburses for expenses and does not provide the money up front. A public hearing on the site plan and variance was held last week. The Hearing Examiner's decision will be issued in approximately three weeks after which there is an established appeal process. The City can not legally delay the project or alter the time frames for land use process. We certainly empathize with the residents regarding the stress, trauma, and inconvenience of relocating their homes. We will continue to work with Carol Warren and the residents to make the transition as easy as possible. Please feel free to call me at 425-430-6500 if you would like to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, 44'44 C 70 4.4.%•1 4.4 A--....0"' 9Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: Jay Covington Jim Shepherd Renton City Council Members `7(� CITY iF RENTON ••i� Mayor Jesse Tanner November 2, 1998 DE `LOP r C!n'OF RE�� N: ,.�� Mr. Roger Haynes, President A.►n i/ ; 1998 Lake Terrace Homeowners Association 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Space#62 RECEivEr, Renton, WA 98056 Dear Mr. Haynes: Thank you for your letter regarding the impending sale of Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park. Your letter requested the City's help in preserving the mobile home park. The City Council and I empathize with the residents. We realize moving is difficult, stressful and inconvenient. Dennis Conte, City of Renton Housing Specialist, has been attending meetings to inform residents of services available and to help with the transition. On August 12`h, he attended a meeting with Trammel Crow. He also helped organize the general meeting on August 25th at Griffin Home and attended homeowners' meetings on September 24th and October 8`h. Trammel Crow is within their rights to apply for redevelopment of the site, and the City must adhere to adopted regulations in processing their application. The City Attorney has issued an opinion that it is unwise, under existing case law,to delay the project. Without just cause as specified in our city code, the City can not alter the time frames specified for land use process. As you know, a public hearing on the site plan and variance was held last week. The Hearing Examiner's decision will be issued in approximately three weeks. As a party of record, you will automatically be sent a copy of his decision. A 14-day appeal period commences with the issuance of the Examiner's decision. If appealed, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee would hear the appeal during a closed record hearing. The project also requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit that is being processed concurrently with the land use application. One of the current property owners has approached the City to consider the possibility of rezoning a parcel of land in the Renton Highlands in order to provide a new site for mobile homes in the City. The owner has met with the City and is now deciding whether or not to apply for a rezone. Staff contact for this potential land use is Peter Rosen and he can be reached at 425-430-7219. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 Roger Haynes 11/04/98 Page 2 Dennis Conte will continue to work with Carol Warren on the relocation of residents. He can be reached at 425-430-6651. Jennifer Henning,project manager for the Trammel Crow project, can be reached at 425-430-7286. cerely, Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: Jay Covington Jim Shepherd Jim Hanson Peter Rosen ..-Jennifer Henning Jana Huerter Dennis Conte Karen Marshall Representative Velma Veloria Senator Margarita Prentice Metro King County Councilmember Rob McKenna PARTIES OF RECORD TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA98-160,AAD LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V Roger Haynes Bill Barlow John Wayland 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#62 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#91 4010 Lk Wash. Blvd N#330 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Kirkland, WA 98033 Zanetta Fontes John Hendrickson Jennifer Henning 1055 S Grady Way 777 108th Avenue NE, #1500 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 98055 Mona Vaught Richard Hopkins Grace Stiller 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#67 2511 Park PI N 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N#80 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Richard Galvin Richard Wagner Mark Jacobs 2407 Garden Court N 2411 Garden Court N 2101 112th Ave NE#100 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Bellevue, WA 98004 Marc McGinnis Greg Diener Ishbel Dickens 13256 NE 20th, #16 130 Andover Park E, #300 1021 NE 70th Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98115 Phil Rutledge Gary Palmer Neil Watts 19336 47th Avenue NE 2507 Park Place N 1055 S Grady Way Seattle, WA 98155 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 David Sager Eric& Cindy Kom Shirley and Odell Milliren 1025 N 28th Place 1211 N 28th Place 1020 N 28th Place Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Manfred and Anne Hansen Dean H. Schellert Barbara Smith 1221 N 26th Street 1013 N 28th Place 1308 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 LaVerne and Mary Jo Graves Patrick McDonald Song Qiao 905 N 28th Place 160 Vashon Place NE 1412 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98056 Sondra Kraft Kim and Theo Brown Charles Jensen 2100 Lk Wash. Blvd N #68 1003 N 28th Place 2621 Meadow Place N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Tina and Jerry Cullers Dean& Cynthia Schumacher Donald& Patricia Rosburg 2506 Meadow Avenue N 1116 N 28th Place 1402 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Robert and Esther Miller Steve and Julie Wasson Barry Oman 1121 N 28th Place 2515 Park Place N 2500 Lk Wash. Blvd N Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 James Scott M. L. Gibson Marlene Mandt 1405 N 28th 1215 N 28th Place 1408 N 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Glyn Gardner Bill & Madeline Arrigoni J. Steve &Nancy Harar 2100 Lk Wash Blvd N #84 907 N 34th Street 11326 Rainier Ave S Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98178 Norma Cugini Gerard& Barbara Shellan Alex Cugini, Jr. 611 Renton S 11 Lummi Key P.O. Box 359 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98057 Nancy Stark Bill Kelly Mark Mykel 4026 133rd Avenue SE 1409 N 26th Street Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98056 I ", SC-1; 68TH a. dY ij a s, a 5 • .... •.Y#a k 'A -44% a? .,ST aI Ie00 ■ i SE rs `6971 -j-,v ; i' 46.kL t ..;. . ' _ a:tt " r 1_yr� ,,, '- , mil Sr loM 5r�_ ��Sr: I, Y N .Y--. 0--- 'N 1 `l •'"' E : G y„ Mai .h, 7 a ':1' Su•t).f_ .yJ '.,'. \ 2 o SETS, St- ` �R. :x 2 aT u Fu'-r. Tf+'',:':y' �! �o sr 1 _ r SE 2 D ns, Y h 'i:-'G�+s, t. n �, 3.•9• ; 1 HAZELWOOD N •, 1 r r' . z✓ ;� ,,r . PK ..„ tt 7). a P( St u 27�; l wlf" �r .6' r''' ,''nor .t''a:YSre'Z 7$ '�Ft =s`rr°4 1 a 7 IT Iz :e a. / • I si < t ��;x ,.p n .4 5. g A l�\� ,� 1 CUA � E 29 • • . N l.. • .. a, e ( ST e V - o r 10,!�! ,,A sc•'at„ '1 I c ,15M S�\ ' • ?F. / 4 ':x Slmr n x er 5 �x 5[ r. '5 I_ ''''*'• _1 r �J r S+"ri•'b \f \�.v NENGISTEE NE r ..:, r ., C _• tt s SC r•Ts,n PA J \ tJ. T9. L ;>;'R a i v y a rr -\ -ri. �:, •� -Sr ' , lit.]: f'� Z1V{,+\ [ F • • K 1..' _ Y �1M Vr • , N A3'.r' ;SC I BOTH lit.]1 it T.STTy\` _\'1.[ r/a f ��. a. 4l e• !,,,. �J!t ir0 n.. f. Pl?J. 111200 a11600s >C� T- :P ttti h Y,, "a 5.'1187 c(da \ 177TN `� 3 K1y us+ .•. AV ,L S[ lerN=3` 1•,4 'NY y= I i ^ ny,"., l� • - 1 a' • 79TN':R S . q QF `ly,j' I i� rf� MAY � ii tg 1•r - < x B fir`h.. r ��•:: Tr r J� r ��• I I I!'1,Y y �` _�1� • ,0' �.\Jf B� 'O;, -_ N AOTH A �..: o[. I s[._' YM sr I lx f =I aI a e.r. rL,...4 '`•.. �� '<•. 1 i, _ H 'Y Sl e5iw r: 11� �U S!s S [T.� .. $T \� .. Al 381H S7 .1.a 7a 'f� F._ sr 111 tr Lk. EL/ iE e t_ 4.ti i E Ir \ 1 t� I I )r. ri.� g N t? SI MI:sr rt^ ! O f� {\� `w1.,..%r11" Y , % ��fi•� .F SI M,. Nnw o r.a I 1 f"YJ '.`.... ffr•,n,il j Ni Y 367H 1 \ ` y'" i 'TN C q < ?'• 7UJ,IAP / - NE 36TH `Sr SC BON ,[Fn sT i,•' 1'1 P �./ L�Z. 'W"I� 4 75TH Si 32 ST a 11600 '�. -` s r� '<I / 5 i ST • W N •�•e y,TLISt e9TH ST I'�b b`"sr rIr' c p1_ W vz\ u� PI fir^ Az 0L-1sE 90tHlsr r 1-: {) r >r =I }t SE 9157 ST'I SE 9157 , a N �+" N 33RD Si E. moo I tor -.�...•9tr0 ST e•Imo `!,•tr•. S .ts�l� SE r i •"It ^ 1 R ^a'�� -.+. �,-E5 915T SI /galMillir 1 •V��I.:,e r ', ,. 9'•'r"'< gl ;s5`� ' f`�+r c NSE _!r.:w0 1 IN �i ... . `i f,M tip) st_ s9 3°' lS. ' T�� . `' ^,nin_'.:421.-Y`,S .T y' MI .^'r' . ? 95TN ...woo = o Y• T YA(LEY RD ©2BTH pi .nN • IIE.■ro 20T11 �" y '!��• .�0 t- - 51 rl.,. - �'-—I_-r�1_ . - TH_ i 1�V .N� 2 ST `,y, y [ S � ��_ 3 a )�1 _ t100 .. rim �,1 Kf t'..er`• SIERR4 <_ 1E la. • • .T. _ W 're ": �I "5� HEIGHTS G i a�. -�! • ))SS i �� MI e -r .x' ' >7'.,1,1£: st 'q N ' K(1 100M" si PART •o • ~ .TMn ` 4I • - a`s :t). 11Eri5 yr•°" 'h n rl .. :, x: -Ei , Im+• v "ITN W 41lai ,.• in st • ••\t\ _� s_� 'min �, _tc<'- ic 3 J s` - 107N0 s s rc a.o ` t.. Y • ?s CX z< 5 NE 21ST Lye ,sT :^ _ \I 1' l;: . SE 104TN I I . - I E- 2vn+ 73 0® A ...„.. a S NE N. a �., ` Z vo0 Y tloo N[ �_ t ^' .CpEftr s: r ICr" , 's rr..,���:�� sT C/— o 9 • I •S ,rww a 4 1 I�p' o- I r % - %1 t'f /� lfiNA.f5 I•. c r L_+SE 06/1 Sr •NE 7 m '. '� s' ,m N bR,l`I a ■■ �` • � N �PARR;Tr fZ( „i K��'-- n■ �l f Y r .-. qy S rt ___- n •II u ' 3 ST r p ■;�r.a Q Nt MI ,n rrmn '� I 9JA f LAUNCH 1 -NI r55,Q' 2A00 fi y� PESO. •m i'- -i+ ET .ty, • ,,• `1 _ .` -11'..,f tim <I': "C S; .... g_ aln.A V _ _�' IAiN YI5 Si '�' NE STN Pt$ w L` I \ I. `' �` ' Ei at��/ Gar Cali N �fl= NE 12TN _ ST ®I NE 11. ��' � -I `CRE K `�'� \ � 6 2100 r, BM an „rove �• NI ' SE 112i�~ - , 8 is m -.�' II NEI �� PARK_ 1'_�R ^tit\i' lig- Ask .I : "`. "�. Lr 11M c ET _ °u N I �F� u -ME ss ll.�.al 6111; '.,•— RIM si _ \� i�Sf i� �g• 1� ft� .3iMiiii2 i�rrialli _ it 4 , '' `T -351° in INE! - �K/Wkf3 SE IIerN <5r'1 PARTz .I bill ` ST TTN R, Op, , ..1 ff -- •.:3 - : Ky !!q�Nf �1 p�� D 21 � P,IRf • {1��� 11� 1111j i. ft' TTN f tI N 3t ":I fN eA:R g 9 _ .. At a �(, $'.1215, ]TH ST i' si r n4.+` ■'- K a • W r�S7 T. s Ft177M l , "Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. This map Is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPSO. It Is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resole, without permission. All rights reserved." l r VICINITY MAP FIGURE TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I k ��j� sd » , K•. � K. ..' I I III L.y 1 s Y' J< , 3 }: ✓t '"' ..7� < -— \ \ w al:taG/ i ...a -- ___., ___2* = - - - - ---.'" 74 41t, :___,_.. .:--.;,,,,.., iF h- .. jjTIt4fP 4,„::... .,0.,.,;, ' - - , - . .. E 1 . ....60.,-.4fOr.:4111111 )1 TTIIYY - _. -- __5_ .,l`\\'",' ► , _r":tit' t/` ° F - l'I.'h1,S,,'Iil'.i‘....-'-z. -Z--.NI'''li)'..•,.4,'.s.''''."'...'...,.,,e.....')“,_')7tA .-7-...,-_-dA"1k 7,.,ig,2r 1/1,..-...,.,,..-.0...i-e.,-.,,--4 -4 ; . _ ,ira� Steep Slope Area-Density Calculations 4,- T r y-_// • •"a..J8 isn. AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "-r'• �„ C. `� TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma A2 TA M A R O N P O I NTE W....�-. ...k•-.- ��_ RENTON.WASHINGTON �,,,,�� M,,,.,,. m.iove .. ""1-_Sp. se=sue �� cm OF PROJECT NAME _ — ," 1N RENTON I '_. I °"`"' ..�""...�..,.° NAME ',1 »o 1RNp10K o. oat MA.� �. �'" .4.-4k7.-,,,,i._. .s. _, ..\\, ..\\ , r,„,,\,.z...,,,,,, . ..,(..41.4„, „,...\_ \., .,;.,.,„\\:\ .....,, . vzriv, .,„\,. .,\ ...... f:, 1 Alliki‘•.V.Ac'•„_,4„,, - ,. y.::„., ,iis.;,..,_ ‘ Alt ''SN ) 11121"Pla\Ytro..1. 4.1k'''.- ---_'-------.----.-- -,k..\\,\VA .\ :•'-.. \-\ ' -\ b011/41P31111611114Frib4Ik' -\ ‘''''''(.8- ''7.r.' ' 'ate\\---;—..-'1-7, Nr‘",.\‘;''..":,\.\..\\\\A`111/,‘4t%- ki•I‘ ---,\s A'1.04elt Okire. : 44 *I .'!/:'',A.\„,,:\\i V,\- ..;:N.. pl, " _ _, 3.,,,6t. %,VA. 21V,W,.,s.s . -..,. ,; ' •-11$4„„,, V ; Ik'\\.'s\'` `\\,,\. ' -::,:::::: „. 0110,„ 4!,,I" '. .4.-zils, .ir iv-.\ ‘,„\,;',:;•.v v.,...,\0.\\\ •• - - . -•....—..\ ",,,..q..‘,t.lits..,9 't-\ •tiii&wilp 41,1110:70001 -.' 'A\ :,.`',1..,-,.),,, s.....‘,\ -\\ ,.:,„,,.... ,,.... ,.., AL. A 16'.Wr V, ...0,Mb\,\t: . �N `A 0, :: r ✓�b`a\ 10 -a' \,''a�N 1I*, ;i!!Sul --- \'',A, N,cliAl ' '•V%, IVA •' trio -4"6..'" N`,,‘ L‘, II li 11 '�.. �► iks �`- vimstiviiv `:` A4 * 33.4 , `W;o • 4*,'. 14 t 11 ' il• ,,,`, \ogyp\ v • ‘. '\'\•‘ 4* ,A,%No ti.. , k,,\\N. Hi -s,,\.. „.„.., , `,,k,\•;., . Top,.,..A.....,%).v."1,4 '‘.,, !>`\,.3. l‘s.- .k'''t4,,„iikik. ,k,k;;Ak§.. .1k.. 1 ty„:41119P3 m ,\. \` ®\ "* •:•I :.'�' \\ Do :. ' Z *,� ; A ip,11;,Ark: r; ?I; . 0 ie I,',.. ..,;,,,,sk. ...‘4,tio ,#pi.1..4,i,,, ..440, 4,,\\.:, '‘...•:,......Z.. <91, *AV k, ,, ,;(00 \''''‘ titos ,', .�: (0 \\ -571. 4iiilit;‘r- , Vi.-41., 11NOVA :1C- 4\41/4;, \NV. *V IripA A ..- Z < ' t t,,. .11.., \ ;,, \ % 46,,. it ,,, \ S\1\AV '',- • it • ram:•• \\Vs $:":, 7Z-1:41\- -0). ... .-`6,., •,.,..,• -,-V...*.rfrr\ ---- I. t)')) \\\ t tk, $,,,,,‘:. 4t,e. 01,,, , . .i.77-..„. ,*, .8, , _ , „,, ..4 ‘. z z \\L'';. ,`,...r.....0orn !I z m �� �d ..�,ri .; V D0 " TAMARON POINTS o..,•or r+v+ro.a orNorou.�r C. .Steal TOSI Z , <.;�> """'..<�I.,ems - IJO ANDOVEF PARK EAST.Soar 300 SULRE,WA 9EIEEMo PHONE:(206)431-7970 EA%:431-7975 , '4 mourA IMAM /--wTcwon %, RAMC 14 r�J ryy ,xy.NR ,, fr>;, II 1 , ,7,4., ,ptket,,, 3 A- . I IWAY Cans 1 PROPERTY 1.111C 11-a 3ectton Luke Wald' ngton Blvd. COL TLWA70T TAMARONPOINTE -- MSR RloR gm i R�oR / eaR f MOR �, RaR t CISR I .1.-\::." • Z. -N {_ +\ —N.,E11rcJdpolnt of roof _IlRlERil laIII i &NMEIira.1N ii .WIAd WnIt Ifkl'IMIMINI' ,)UI0AI6'fI;IWII't.6W ■ ��'�j• Ati �. ! ''t. i.IIt. -..'mI.'nL*.111.11 MEiDl V ViIl .1� Ci,l fY�'�` !IN non. i • I�i.`ral� ,: Q, \.vorogofinlcilgJnda Ina A — West Elevation _ _ outh levation • /_ !I!_.._ YWR. •_YIOR_Jr. QIOR RaR RIOR RIOR 6R M 11 1 lyL ..\NI g....0,.. P5'S .:•1 lid MI's Er- al :: .11 ' bd , EB ,Efic :_,:;ir.tp., .., , ,i.!lir :jot p- tir',- r-, -: !_. ..) zoo ,ill , .„.. .. .,,..„01.i j,... 1 .) 1.7, „gm.. ,...1 7 .r.r. ! -, !. Mb . = Li East Elevation North Elevation Type°Dn Elevation - Bonding 10 . , T9pe II N&ip"Similar c-' -- AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR ••^--� TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma A9 TAMARON POINTE �u �,.•�� RENTON,WASHINGTON o•,•�, „o ,,,,,,,, ,, o7-iove • 9t61 r-0•r INN 9e P1 r1T 94C1 a .t'\ ��_ � — ---� r u.I\ -- `I i - \top of plata v .' ,A\. IY.fj.`:��I ., ii�� :1?: era h s ■E + 'q. r k •.: _ .— 1; ■■ :,' ■�( !ram. ya.'f!. „. •, . : 1�Itliii s: �•I ,C `-iiN Em,A r � f•� �lilr l '�Fi►• "T f �op�a a • • I IIL l — p�lklFll` •.•:l. -I■■ �■ II"I` ■ i S t1!! :.: r' isa tltlp i>{ 1■ ■u ! i:. `11r... ■ ■■ I■ lill i ul„ 1 ''1 I . f wR''�I� 1■ ■■ ■C o ..1 141.0 __�_ =.1.il +�1 �; 1 - top ofplpood ., ., ri� 4 4 rinpoll 119!NI t .t1f�i' - NM l • I I I ,i a1 ($`, �7 ■I� 1■ ■■ ' a •i/ ii ��■ I■ - ' Mas. 1 ' i.i ° top.,ow • J ., li 1m emu ._ 1■_ ■�. ��� East Elevation I99'-0• 9120.1 4,CT 9Y CI 9f CI DO 91 0.1 ,,,,,jib VI 1— - 11" I. SI kV lel ii I'i ii i■ j' i. -11 t I 1,, ,, 1 - .,.,... . _ ,_ ,: -i, ,-_,.:7:. ,§ t , 1 4his. is Ino ��, _ li1a"�...�).1Lla : r IIiit'll M !i i oimilii si-srli( li 10 =1 i!1l�tiili+i' fiCiM i1ill;'� (L I. J1NM4191 Afotiii!!ai=ti ohm a ��.: 0 ! �I�'r7lfl a ilo l.IT:111v,■• 1-.17■i� 'i . =--rr;lr ••MIN' 'il :Thil ri i l aapati; .I4j i1 nll'11►�! _ 1sl4911Yli .g1�-1 iii i414 r gt.� ;Hi .1 tlili�t i v.,,-1 i"'.�`i d tliio r.�i C' i tlil�itf it yA E9 A .1� 1�^I..r ir�1 . „RBA 7_-a2-- 1 ti I'i . • ...typical Poor Plan Building Type"A" - Fuilding 8 (Building 14 similar) AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "••'"'•"'••1..4 ,1rfZ TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma A4 TAMARON POINTE MIN.• •••«.•... RENTON,WASHINGTON rote'•'•Mal ° wrote.«oouo S.au+wDamW46Po a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Lori L. Furnish first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRON N ONL REVIEW COMMITTEE R600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 The Environmental Review Committee g g (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V,ECF The applicant has applied to develop a continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County 182-unit multi-family residential develop- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the ment on 10.69 acres.The project requires State of Washington for King County. environmntavariance,and lieew shorelineas b n troval, ant al The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County development permit. Location: 2100 Lake Journal (and not in supplemental form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Washington Blvd North. a- durin the below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a Appeals bef the environmentalw dorermiore g lion must filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998.Appeals must Tamaron Pointe Apts. be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South as published on: 10/5/98 Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $60.10 Additional information regarding the appeal Legal Number 5238 process may be obtained from the Renton . ,/ City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. cY(6.) -D 1 A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the Legal Cler outh CountyJournal seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South g Grady Way, Renton, WA on October 27, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan /( approval and Variance. If the Environmen- Subscribed and sworn before me on this l �I ` clay of i _I - , 19 ( tal Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the \�0o`o11t1 t Y f r frropublic hearing. G-d,„0.,--, --V� Publication Date:October 5, 199�, �t1 1.1: ��i ' \ TT}l� Published in the South CountyJournal �N\,,�.• Z90:1 C•...'`e ,,� October 5,1998.5238 ��;o '' ! Notary Public of the State of Washington residing in Renton �__ = King County, Washington c `f`'. ' (.:.*'7)`. Oct-26-98 01 : 12P STAR PHOTO 562- 1550 P . 01 1 c Gary Palmer M 0 d C [I 2507 !'ark Place North Renton Washington 98056 jj 2 6 �',,`-�' HEARING EXCITY OF AMINER October 26. 1998 O• Office of Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman Io55 S. (iradv Way Kenton.. VVa.shington 9805c Subject: Tamaron Pointe near Mr Kaufman As residence and taxpayers of view properties, we are very much concerned with the development of the apartment complex and Tamaron Pointe Following are some concerns: Building 14 exceeds height limitations and is in direct line of sight of our view. This building also obstructs our view from the lot we own directly below our residence which we also own and are paving taxes on as view property. Hill side profile is steeper that indicated. may require a retention system. Given the questionable accuracy of this information and the no less than lour corner markers indicating one corner of our lot, serious ouestions arise regarding placement and height of all structures and their impact on view Parking is located on our side of the building as will result in unacceptable noise levels.. Increased density of property will increase noise pollution by a factor of at least six, given the number of units And the younger and more transient nature of the tenants. Parking should he located on the west side of the building. Lighting should be shaded to prevent unwanted light pollution and glare from lights themselves Landscaping plan indicates the planting of Douglas Fir. These trees can grow to a height of 200 feet and more and in time will totally obstruct our view These plantings are totally unacceptable. Plans do not call for a fence between the two properties Given the age factor and transient nature ol'rental tenants, we can expect our property to be trespassed and privacy violated without some system to retain tenants. We are not unreasonable people and have known that this sort of project may happen. We are concerned with the size of the buildings and their location, particularly when they are placed in a position where they are most likely to offend We are and have been paying taxes for view property and take any threat to that very seriously. It ' • unlikely t our taxes will go down as a result of this project Thank Li fo to - rig our ce cerns into consideration. .../r22.3/ .,.../ Gary Palmer n.. _..:,.a ( TY )F RENTON tk,per;, ..tL Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman October 20, 1998 Mr. Roger Haynes, President Lake Terrace Homeowners Association 2100 Lk Washington Blvd.N#62 Renton, WA 98056 Re: Appeal of ERC's Determination re Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal File No. LUA98-160,AAD Dear Mr. Haynes: We received your appeal dated October 19, 19998, and the hearing will be scheduled for Tuesday, October 27, 1998, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Should you have any further questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Warren, City Attorney Jennifer Henning, Project Manager Applicant 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 • ° CIT = REF\ 1 OCT 1 91998 Preface RECEIVED cLaThe Lake Terrace Home Owners Association has compile ist of cor mentslthat reflect on the poor quality of the developer's preparation of the Environmental Checklist. We apologize if the format is difficult to follow or if we fail to address it in the technical manner required. Please remember we are just residents doing this in our spare time. However,we think we have a lot of good points. In fact we question why the Planning/Building/Public Works Department Environmental Review Committee recommends a Determination Of Non-Significant Impact - mitigated' based on the incomplete and misleading Environmental Checklist;we feel the project needs a full blown environmental impact study. Moreover we recommend a study that evaluates the entire corridor because of the many changes that are proposed within the immediate vicinity between exits 5 through 7 along I-405 and Lake Washington. We the residents are the most impacted by this development,therefore we are filing this appeal to reject the Determination Of Non-Significant Impact-mitigated. It should be noted we were not individually served the notice of the Determination Of Non-Significant Impact -mitigated as required by the Environmental Review process (see attachment A). B.1 Earth • Refer to item# c.The developer has pointed out the need to remove loose fill from the site which is not "natural soils consisting of silty sand with varying amounts of gravel". Yet he does not mention this loose fill when answering the question "what soils are present"B.1.c.nor does he offer information about the types of soil used as fill. For all we know this could be soil from the contaminated Port Quendall site,just down the road. • Refer to item#d.the developer states that there is no history of unstable soils. Yet in the request for variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance(see attachment B)he acknowledges, "fill material contains organic matter and has shown signs of movement and settlement, and is unstable for new construction. The slope area between the North and South driveways currently shows signs of soil sliding down the slope onto Lake Washington Boulevard". Furthermore,tenants of lot space#72 and#74 (back tier of trailers) recall the spring of 1997 when two very large trees were uprooted by earth slides that caused serious damage to their units. Lake Washington Blvd. has been closed in this vicinity twice since 1996 due to earth slides. The residents on Park Place North note"the hillside behind the planned development (between Park Place N. and the development, and Garden Ave. and the development)have a history of problems with instability and erosion that could be aggravated by the planned development. • Refer to item#e.the developer states that 10,000 yards of soil will be cut and filled but does not specify the purpose,type of fill and grading they propose as requested. The developer is requesting a variance(see attachment B)to allow unstable fill laid on the original steep slopes to be excavated,thereafter he would refill parts of the original slope with structural fill that can accommodate the heavier structures. He intends to recreate man-made steep slopes in order to build buildings 6,7,8, and 13. The 10,000 yards of soil noted in answer B.1.e. is actually additional fill needed to prepare the site, not the more extensive cut/fill is proposed, see Earthcalc, Inc. calculations below: - 1 Revised date of application September 14, 1998.Note the City has the right to levy certain reasonable impact fees on the developer which should compensate for the negative impact the project might have on the adjacent community. region area ft2 cut volume yds3 fill volume Overexcavation 160,517 SF 43,899 cu.Yds. 0 OverEx to Desie(including back ill) 406,113 SF 24.564 cu. Yds. 36,085 Also note that to make the exit drive more perpendicular as recommended by Department of Public Works (change from 30°angle to between 45°and 90°)will requires major earth moving and variance from the greater than 8%grade driveway requirements. • Refer to item# g. the developer states that the pre-development pervious is 258,174 SF. This is erroneous as the measurement counts the 75,161 SF covered by mobile homes as impervious,however under the trailer there are only 2 cement pads measuring 240 SF (the double wide pad is 3' X 40')the remainder of the area is covered in loose gravel which allows storm water to seep into the ground. An empirical examination will confirm this. The calculation needs corrected as it is more than 3 times the actual area of impervious surface. • a corridor environmental analysis needs to be undertaken to assess the impact of the loss of impermeable surface though-out this corridor. This will help establish an equitable share for each developments' surface water SDC fee. B. 3. Water • Refer to item#a.1. There are allegedly 3 springs on the property that should be reported as water bodies in the immediate vicinity of the site. Also it should also be noted that this site is in Aquifer Protection Zone 2, because of it's juxtaposition to the City of Renton deep well, used as a reserve water source. Ignoring the Aquifer Protection Zone 2 leaves the whole issue of impact on water recharge of the aquifer unanswered. • Refer to item#a.4.The plan for diversion of the spring outflow should be included. B.4.Plants • Refer to item#b. Black berry bushes will be uprooted during the excavation and refilling process. Because heavy machinery is involved a routine vegetation management permit is required. Other stipulations may apply. B.5.Animals • Refer to item# a. Please include sightings of: raccoon, quail, eagles, deer,hawks, and wild rabbits. B.7.b.Noise • Refer to item # b.2.the neighborhood should expect construction noise for 15 months (8/15/99 - 11/15/2000) between 7 am and 7 pm; (see the construction mitigation description, attachment C). This is too long of an annoyance(the City only permits a short day)! We request a new plan that allows occupancy by early 2000 (as the developer claims in his own description of the project). Furthermore the proposed construction involves closely spaced heavy re-enforced pilings to be driven under buildings 11, 13,and 15. This will cause significant noise that may require special mitigation, i.e. restricted hours of pounding or reduction in other construction during the pounding,to minimize overall noise. B.8 Land and Shoreline Use • Refer to item# a.When asked to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected uses and plans,the developer fails to list adjacent land uses as requested(also requested in B.8.a.). To the north is the Friends of Youth group home for 25 juvenile boys and the site of the proposed Labrador Ventures (66 new units)to the south is the Marina Landing apartments (184 units managed by Tammell Crow)and the proposed Bluffs housing project (165 new units). • Refer to item# k. The relocation assistant has not provided us with quality,relevant,nor complete information; many residents have much better information than she does about relocation opportunities. Furthermore TRC mentions Washington State relocation assistance "provides for reimbursement of actual relocation costs". In reality those funds only cover approximately half the costs of mobile homes that have already been moved. • Refer to item#I. A new high income apartment complex next door to the Friends of Youth is not compatible. At present the residential treatment center for juvenile offenders is reasonably buffered from their neighbors;the fact that there is no record of an incident in the neighborhood for the last 10 years. However,the surrounding community continues to raise concern about having juveniles offenders in the neighborhood. We feel the introduction of a densely populated rental complex will add to the risk that the juvenile boys will have contact with neighbors. B.9. Housing • Refer to item# a. & b.TRC claims that the majority of their 182 units will be medium and high and the majority of the 92 mobile homes are medium and low. In B.9.c. TRC calls all 182 units middle income. This should be clarified to reflect reality-92 mostly low income units being replaced by 182 mostly high income units • according to the revised Comprehensive Plan (1993)the City has a policy to provide low and moderate income housing and therefore should be concerned about the forced dislocation of 92 units of low income housing. Furthermore they state a commitment to preserving mobile /manufactured homes as a low and moderate option. • the residents have a statutory right to exercise their first right of refusal to purchase the property. The City has made no attempt to assist the residents to examine how they might go about realizing this option. B.10. Aesthetics • Refer to item#a.The developer can only achieve maximum allowable density of 20 D.U. per acre if the City is willing to allow structures larger than those specified in the Zoning Code (RM-I=2.5 story and 35' height limits). However in the spirit of Growth Management,the Site Plan Review committee should hold the developer to these limits and not permit 15 three- story buildings of 34' and 56 units of flats (2 bldgs., 3 story plus basement)of 40'10". B 12. Recreation • Refer to item#a.the existing 4 foot wide at-grade regional bicycle trail,on both sides of Lake Washington was not noted on the developers' drawings • Refer to item#b.The developer does not mention the potential disruption/danger created by increased vehicular crossings of the northbound lane of the regional bicycle trail. Furthermore the traffic study does not address the friction factor for the bicycle lane.Nor does it allow time for bicycle movements in the intersection capacity analysis (the study calculates level of service at the intersection considering motorized vehicles only). Likewise when asked to look at Tamaron, Labrador and Bluff traffic impact as a composite,the Public Works Department did not consider bicyclists. 41, B.14. Transportation • Refer to item#a.The developer fails to note the highway connection to the route which is less than 1 mile away. The State DOT is requesting that impact to the highways be calculated;this supports the need for a corridor study of development related traffic between exits #5-7 on I- 405. This is especially important during the construction phase when more than 1,000 trucks will be moving earth to the site. • • Refer to item# c.The developer should note he is requesting permission to exceed recommended parking ratio; a total of 53 spaces more than stipulated in Parking and Loading Ordinance. This is likely to increase actual trip making. A limited number of parking spaces discourages ownership of 2 -3 cars per family. Traffic studies have proven that without the extra vehicle many trips are deferred. • Refer to item#e. According to the Sound Transit Plan,there is a proposal to run commuter rail on the track immediately between the property and Lake Coulon Park. • Refer to item #f. In reviewing the Traffic Study we note that the consultants prefers to use trip equation over trip rate to assess the traffic impact. The conclusion was the 182 units of apartment would generate 1,226 average weekday trips while the mobile home park produces 602 trips. We can accept the methodology of the prior calculation but contest the rates used for the mobile home park. The City concludes the mobile home park will generate only 443 trips using a 4.81 trip rate per unit per day. However because of the inordinately high number of elderly and handicapped people in the park our trip rate needs to be adjusted down towards the 3.0 trip rate per unit per day(i.e. see ITE retirement community rate of 0.17 trips per day).This would generate only 246 trips and would alter the peak hour activity as well. Basically the new apartment project is going to generate 80%more traffic than we currently experience., • The City claims they have no intent on widening Lake Washington Blvd. in the near future2, yet they have not performed a traffic impact analysis of the corridor using a 2010 or 2020 horizon,which includes the Bluffs, Tamaron, Labrador, and Port Quendall. We realize there is no fixed plan for Port Quendall at present, but various scenarios could be plugged into an analysis of this corridor. By considering the added demand that Port Quendall will have on Lake Washington Blvd. the City Council would be in a better position to determine if they want to approve a series of variances for the Tamaron Pointe project when their demand for multi-family housing can be met further down the road where improvements can be better accommodated. • Because traffic is such a big issue we feel the traffic count done June 2, 1998, between the hours of 4-6 pm. do not allow provide adequate information to make conclusive determination of the traffic impact. We recommend a series of all day counts be undertaken,which include counts at both entrances to the existing mobile home park. B.15. Public Services. • Refer to item#a. Schools -Kennydale has reached its capacity of 385 students and the Board of Education master plan calls for keeping this school small. If three portables were added they could accommodate 75 more students. The school could not accept the students from Tamaron/LabadorBluffs combined. A corridor analysis is needed to help resolve how to accommodate new elementary pupils and who will pay. 2 The transportation mitigation fee is based on a 20 year transportation improvement program costing$134 million. • attachment A-the Environmental Review process attachment B -request for variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance attachment C -see the construction mitigation description • • l.. Summary As concerned citizens who are directly impacted by this project we have been forced to familiarize ourselves with the environmental issues that need to be addressed for the development of this site. We are appalled that the developer made little to no effort to accurately describe the environmental issues via the Environmental Checklist. Equally disappointing was the Environmental Review Committee Staff Report which fails to bring some our points to light. Based on the circumstances we ask the hearing examiner to hear our appeal of the Determination Of Non-Significant Impact- mitigated and we request the project undertake a full EIS. Our position is: • no variances or deviation from the rules and regulations that control development of this property should occur, • an analysis of the entire corridor needs to be undertaken to accurately assess the impact of foreseeable development on Lake Washington Blvd. and the aquifer protection area, • the bicyclist should be given more consideration in all project analysis, and finally that • the economic plight of the residents of Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park be given greater consideration. Thank you for hearing our concerns, Respectfully Yo - /L , L ,vto/) President of the Lake Terrace Mobile ome Owners Association. PANE Alya 72 04 • 1, fr Oe October 20, 1998 j‘� t c'✓ 'v 98 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning © Project Manager City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 cc: Mr. Jim Hansen Mr. Jim Shepard Mr. Gregg Zimmerman Subject: Tamaron Points Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF,V-H Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Our house is adjacent to the proposed Tamaron Pointe development,being separated by an undeveloped space that is 118 ft wide. This undeveloped property consists primarily of a steep bluff,placing my house approximately 60 ft above the current plateau on which the mobile homes sit. I have reviewed the site drawings for the proposed new Tamaron Pointe. As a neighbor, I have the following concerns regarding the development as proposed. • The current layout for parking spaces along the North edge of the Eastern property line of the plat will require excavation into the base of the bluff. The current drawings do not show this to be a sloped area. However, I have walked this area, using survey markers as my guidelines, and found that the eastern most 10-15 feet of the Tamaron site consists of a very steep bluff, about 15-20 feet in height. My house, and the other houses along Park Place North, are at the top of this bluff. Like my surrounding neighbors, I have already seen signs of soil erosion and slippage at the base of our property line. This is contributed to by the usage of perforated drainage lines, which capture street runoff water, disperse it along the upper edge of this bluff, and allow it to run down the bluff. My concern is that excavation into the bluff will further increase its instability, and increase the chances of mud slides. Several mud slides were visible from Lake Washington Blvd during the winter of 1997-1998, including: one north of 28th,which closed that section of Lake Washington Blvd for several months one at the north entrance to the existing motor home park, on the east side of the blvd one along the bluff just south of Marina Landing apartments, on the east side of the blvd. I propose that the parking stalls planned for this area be moved back a sufficient distance to not only avoid any escavation into the hill,but also leave a safety margin to accommodate any debris(from vegetation)that might roll off the bluff and impact cars parked there. A • The Tamaron Pointe Project Description document, in the "Shoreline Elements" section, states that"There are no structures and/or residential units off site(existing or potential)which will have views obstructed as a result of the proposed project." All dwellings currently on the property are single level mobile homes,typically having less than 12 ft peak height. These will be replaced by several 4 story buildings (with peak height of 41 ft), and many 3 story buildings (with peak height of 34 ft). These units will have a significant impact on our current view of Lake Washington. One of the 4 story buildings is being placed directly between us and our view of Lake Washington and our view of Gene Coulon Park. I propose that four story buildings not be allowed at the north end of the site, and that buildings 13 and 15 be limited to 2 stories in height. Reducing the height of building 14 from 4 stories to 3 would reduce the total number of units on the site from 182 to 174. Reducing the height of buildings 13 and 15 would reduce the square footage of each unit, but would not reduce the total number of units. These reductions would also improve the views for Building 14. • The vegetation plan calls for the planting of Douglas Fir trees along the north property edge of the Tamaron Pointe site. These trees can grow to a height of 70 to 250 feet tall. This will further block our view of Lake Washington and impact our property value in future years. I propose that another type of lower growing tree be planted in this area. • The proposed population density(number of units)adjacent to our house will be more than doubled,potentially doubling the noise levels at our house. The increased number of vehicles and their resulting noise, will further add to the noise levels. Since all the buildings will be directly in line of sight to our house,there will be no natural noise attenuation. Except for existing noise from the mobile home park,we currently enjoy a very"quiet"neighborhood. Unfortunately,the only mitigation I can recommend for this situation is to decrease the density of units allowed at the north end of the Tamaron Pointe development. • Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current mobile home site. With a parking area at the base of our properties we are concerned about the additional light that will be visible to our neighborhood. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs and strategic light pole placement. • The proposed addition of 182 units will increase the traffic density along Lake Washington Blvd. I travel this route from my home to work each morning and evening. I remember when the stop signs along lake Washington Blvd were added to discourage people from using this route to bypass traffic congestion on 1-405. To this extent, I have observed the money spent by the city to be effective in achieving the desired result. The added density of Tamaron Pointe will partially undo what has previously been gained. My concern is not only the impact due to the Tamaron Pointe Development,but the combined impact of other developments currently being proposed or studied. These include: 1. Labrador Venture-66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs-200 units 3. Multi-family units between Marina Landing Apartments and Tamaron Pointe Apartments. Each of these developments will make it increasing difficult to get onto Lake Washington Blvd from Burnett Street and the north exit from Gene Coulon Park. In addition, it will make it more dangerous to walk or bicycle along lake Washington Blvd using the existing painted lanes. This can only be mitigated by decreasing the number of housing units allowed in the Tamaron Pointe development or re-addressing the traffic impact analysis. Thank you. Sincerely, Rich and Susan Hopkins 2511 Park Place N Renton,WA 98056 1 1.1 l7 166 Zone lal-1 Zone ,�-�! Sag or -e a- �c `�YtWP i _-+r R• r R P.vP-.11 1 buy clop.are. (� -...1LatAc'Twn `�-'� _ _ J f i -�- verse---______ • ..., . ....... ...,. _ _____.—•ir..............--- ,iii—• r....-- ...ifiift-; #*111 ... • ..... .a _sictitomilit , 1 , _ •••., ., g._:,,, toritilw mismitl.--r - * t•,,ir5 L., I II n R-•Zen. ilk '1 .............;........:...,. ,, . . I................ ........... ik V lat.\\Irs i^:\....:* ' : 31113:173% ,- :sl 1-- r r'a ... ...a� iii,P��-N- st I �'• �lk�",.. '' -- , , ��y�` �PARKINCs DATA 1/i1 W ,� W vi �' OA110• REGULAR(lO G n) 223 I{ • W.�4W M ` ', *Ire "" COMPACT(3 S.,% �, -• 0��� � ' .\ , PARKING PROVIDED `.\ ,,,,_.. ,^1 �, '���� 04 I I LANDSCAPE DATA REGULAR SIZE: ` r "• 15410100 • - - ' I. I'� INTERIOR PARKING: 21640 or. II4CARACE: le ` _t 440 -• •\�`� � . • ._� STEEP SLOPE OPEN 9PAOE: 69b%6f. OPEN: Ell \ NORTH OTHER LANDSCAPE AREA: 141981 at TOTAL REG, 325 TOTAL LANDSCAPE/OPEN SPACE 138913..E CCMPACt (111z) 4l `� ° SITE PLAN TOTAL FAKING 3i2 ``O� O _ ____ PAPoGING LANDSCAPE DATA: R-I Zen* �`'`���� DATE' SCALE 1'"� PARKING AND DRIVEWAY: 112,t91 of. INTERIOR PARKING LANDSCAPING:216 ,If 1921i) -�° BUILDING MATRIX UNIT MATRIX R91r'd' ♦` : �... xDG nPE e.r.Lt R.2rd R. 3rtl.FI.fOTAI wr4ge eLtx.nPE 9•D-1 90C-I 9BC-IL 060 p10 CIO G0 'TOTAL I 'SITE PLAN DATA I E 3086 6030 992814646 2µ2 1 E 8 2 10 \ ,' 2 D 800 4860 4,422 10002 3660 2 D 111 v �1 6 2 3 C 2.466 4660 4,422 II,TO 1,992 3 C 6 2 • LOT COVERAGE DATA: / -W 4 15 610 3690 3316 16616 2,150 4 O 4 2 6 617E AREA: 469656 wf. ' 6 E 3000 6030 9938(4646 1.462 9 C 6 2 13 �' 6 D 600 4p60 4,422 10082 3660 6 D 6 2 • BUILDING AREA(GROUND FLOORS 99,1*.f. /• BLDG.COVERAGE MATRIX 1 C 0 2,466 4060 4,422 11,110 1,952 1 C 6 2 8 LOT COVERAGE: 212; (allawblR:35;) p41 n,082 11062 I1612 39101 • A 14 VD 28 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE DATA: h Oldg.Fyxae.Na.a py1p,. TOTAL le 10 0 0 4260 4,422 101082 3,660D le 8 6 2 2 • A MD FOOTPRINT: 99116 of,11¢826,2 2 as. 3,400S F. II C 2µ8 4,860 4,422 1(110 1,992 II CPATIOS 4 SIDEWALKS: 14920.f. C 3,400.,1. 1 each 3,400..f. 6 2 • C 4µ06f 1 each 313606.r 12 E 3068 6030 652814646 2µ2 G E 6 2 le DR VEWAY6•PARKING: 112191 of. D 4µ06f. 3 Mth 133p0n f. 19 C 2,488 4660 4,422 II,TO 1,992 3C 6 2 • E 5,532.r. 3 each 15332.5! 14 A 5941 11,001 11082 111082 38.1p1 M A 14 le 4 7• TOTAL: (48,1 226833 or. F 5 316.f. each 59326f. 2,465 4360 4,422 11,110 1,952 • C 6 2 0 '• W F 990 8090 5928❑968 4642 16 F p 2 rTSx allowable/ ...we 29906.2. I each 29906.f. 10 -_ ... n c 2.488 4960 4,422 11,110 1,992 11 C 6 2 8 4 a TOTALS 1 18 B454T p366f b ...... 2950 Garage. 13606,E 3 d 4,086's.f. TOTAL 10 20 8 66 30 20 10 102 TOTAL TOTAL Oulldv Coverage: 1 99,1166f. FREE STANDING2 �D433 GARAGE (3 each) a44e4Yf AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR Arohltootwo TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma _Al TAMARON POINTE10330 VW,Ave.AL •ee•Re. RENTON,WASHINGTON .('°'..o0310 ,Ak02_,»1 0720-96 cn JW �`� _tea+ r ► — ,,,4;,4710.-----___ 0,..--------------'----::-z----1'=' — eolpr * o- �,,A,� PRC1- / _ '�,' I , 8 ‘,....,"......„,..A:110*IlatbOr_... _ „.0.„,,, ,,;:,.. >-%--,---=-..'.°r-- --------: 6 I I �� :aY ,a. Steep Slope Area-Density Calculations am' AMA.eae• 191BW allowed(IB]J 0 jol i •, ,- 1 °. a`� • AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR a w#, TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL ��� 'a'� f TAMARON POINTE ,,"": RENTON,WASHINGiON 061.0.00 F,,,,,,-,,,, O7 „ „ zaPo =METROSCAN PROPERTY PROFILE= King (WA) OWNERSHIP INFORMATION <, Parcel Number : 229650 0200 06 Q : NW S: 05 T: 23{�1' R : 05E Building Id # : 1 C/ Parcel Type : Platted t y Owner/Taxpayer : Lake Terrace Assoc 406. CoOwner • �+ •v" •C�' Site Address : 2100 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 k�b 1,4 Mail Address : 312 Fairview Ave N Seattle Wa 98109 Telephone : Owner : Tenant : 425-277-5074 SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Recording Date : 12/30/88 Loan Amount : Auditors Fee# : 2061 Lender Sale Price : Loan Type : Deed Type : Quit Claim Interest Rate : Owned : 100 Vesting Type : ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Land : $1,803,400 %Improved : Structure : $1,000 1998 Taxes : $23,777.55 Total : $1,804,400 Exempt Code : Levy Code : 2100 Excise Tax# : PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Census : Tract: 253.00 Block: 2 Map Grid : 626 D5 Neighborhood Cd : 530000 Zoning Code : T Land Use : 141 Res,Mobile Home Park,1 To 9 Units Legal : LOT POR ELDON ACRES ADD LOTS 39, : 40&41 TGW W 1/2 OF VAC RD ADJ : LOT 39 TGW ALL VAC RDS ADJ LOT 40 Sub/Plat : Eldon Acres Add Recording Num : Short Plat Volume : 11 Page : 86 Jurisdiction Profile-Page 1 of 2 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • METROSCAN PROPERTY PROFILE= King (WA) Parcel# : 229650 0200 Bldg Id# : 1 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms : 1st Floor SF : Year Built : 1961 Bath Full : 2nd Floor SF : Eff Year : Bath 3/4 : 3+Floor SqFt : Garage Type : Bath 1/2 Half Floor SF : Bsmnt Type : Other Rms : AboveGroundSF : BsmntGrade : Dining Rm : Finished SqFt : Bldg Matl : Frame Fireplace Fin Bsmnt SF : Bldg Cond : Appliance : UnfinBsmnt SF : Bldg Grade : Avg Deck : BsmntTotal SF : Wall Mat! : Porch : Bsmnt Park SF : %of Brick : Pool : Building SqFt : 3,478 %of Stone : Spa Lease SqFt : 1,397 HeatSource : Sauna : Deck SqFt : Heat Type : Forced Tennis : Carport SqFt : ElectrcSvc : Stories : 1 AttachedGrgSF : Wtr Source : Units : DetachedGrgSF : Sewer Type : Elevator : No Nuisance : Design Type : LAND INFORMATION VIEW INFORMATION STREET INFORMATION Lot Acres : 11.82 View : None St Surface : Lot SqFt : 515,253 View City : St Access : Std Lot Shape : Irregular View Lake/River : St Light : Tde/Upind : View Lk Wa/Samm : Curb/Gutter : Topogrphy : Broken View Mountain : Sidewalk : TopoProbs : View Puget • Sprinkler : No Wtr Front : Unit Mix 1 • WtrFrntSF : Unit Mix 2 • GroundCvr : Unit Mix 3 • GolfAdj : Unit Mix 4 • Unit Mix 5 • Profile-Page 2 of 2 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • MetroScan/King (WA) 14 Owner : Stride Edith Parcel# : 052305 9001 03 Site : 1317 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 1317 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $185,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 1 NE 1/4 OF NW Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,400 Ac: 1.52 YB:1952 Ph: 425-255-2129 Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9005 09 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $3,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 5 N 20 FT OF W Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .46 YB: Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9006 08 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $80,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 6 W 112.50 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .93 YB: Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9007 07 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $80,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 7 POR OF GOV LOT Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .97 YB: Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9009 05 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $85,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 9 POR OF GL 1 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 1.02 YB: Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9012 00 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $240,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 12 30 FT S&30 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 3.35 YB: Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9013 09 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $90,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 13 E 228 FT OF W Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 1.50 YB: Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9017 05 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $95,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 17 POR OF E 228 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 1.85 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • - MetroScan/King (WA) i Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9018 04 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $30,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 18 W 60 FT OF E Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .09 YB: Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9019 03 Site : 1023 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $109,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 19 BEG 30 FT S& Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories:-1 BldgSF: 1,560 Ac: 1.35 YB:1930 Ph: Owner : Stork Michael Ray Parcel# : 052305 9027 03 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : Mail : 2219 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $65,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 27 POR OF PC RY Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 1.10 YB: Ph: 425-277-2548 Owner : Reid Christine Parcel# : 052305 9028 02 Site : 1409 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 08/05/92 Mail : 1409 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $139,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 28 POR OF NE 1/4 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,520 Ac: .22 YB:1920 Ph: 206-255-8700 Owner : Hughes Edward A&Jeanne K Parcel# : 052305 9030 08 Site : 1421 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 04/19/96 Mail : 1421 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $147,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 30 PORTION OF NE Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,350 Ac: .22 YB:1990 Ph: 425-227-8068 Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9031 07 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 31 S 10 FT OF N Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .12 YB: Ph: Owner : State Of Washington Parcel# : 052305 9032 06 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $46,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 32 W 434 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .32 YB: Ph: Owner : City Of Renton Parcel# : 052305 9033 05 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $100 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 33 RESERVE STRIP Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan/King (WA) Owner : Alviz Timoteo Z Parcel# : 052305 9040 06 Site : 1309 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 09/19/86 Mail : 1309 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $140,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 40 POR OF NE 1/4 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,700 Ac: .27 YB:1979 Ph: 206-226-1489 Owner : Jensen Charles Parcel# : 052305 9045 01 Site : 2721 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2721 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $173,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 45 POR OF NE 1/4 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,800 Ac: .23 YB:1960 Ph: 425-255-3821 Owner : Geffre Steven A Parcel# : 052305 9046 00 Site : 2719 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 03/13/89 Mail : 2719 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $162,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 46 POR OF NE 1/4 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 /1 /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,730 Ac: .18 YB:1955 Ph: 425-271-7385 Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9049 07 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $55,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 49 POR OF GL 1 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .23 YB: Ph: Owner : Geffre J G Parcel# : 052305 9050 03 Site : 2717 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2717 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $120,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 50 POR OF NE 1/4 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,400 Ac: .15 YB:1957 Ph: 425-226-6742 Owner : Foss Launch&Tug Co Parcel# : 052305 9051 02 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : Mail : 660 W Ewing St Seattle Wa 98119 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 51 TR 4 OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .05 YB: Ph: 206-281-3872 Owner : Oneal Terry G Parcel# : 052305 9053 00 Site : 2716 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2716 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $130,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 53 N 90 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,300 Ac: .19 YB:1962 Ph: 206-226-6206 Owner : Mctigue J H Parcel# : 052305 9054 09 Site : 2713 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2701 Meadow PIN Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $148,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 54 POR NE 1/4 OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,380 Ac: .23 YB:1980 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. a MetroScan/King (WA) - Owner : Delgado Francisco F Parcel# : 052305 9056 07 Site : 1303 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 1303 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $122,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 56 POR OF NW 1/4 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,020 Ac: .27 YB:1968 Ph: Owner : Vanbeurden Franciscus Parcel# : 052305 9057 06 Site : 1313 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 1313 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $122,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 57 E 70.00 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,200 Ac: .28 YB:1968 Ph: 425-226-7754 Owner : Brown Adolph C Parcel# : 052305 9058 05 Site : 1319 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 1319 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $128,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 58 E 75.00 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,260 Ac: .23 YB:1968 Ph: Owner : Wright James B&Michele L Parcel# : 052305 9059 04 Site : 1321 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 07/31/89 Mail : 1321 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $74,902 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $117,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 59 POR NE 1/4 OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,250 Ac: .21 YB:1968 Ph: 425-271-7802 Owner : Wong Chin V&Huyuh Phuong Q Parcel# : 052305 9060 01 Site : 1307 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/07/93 Mail : 1307 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $155,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $145,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 60 POR OF NE 1/4 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,060 Ac: .28 YB:1968 Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9068 03 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $30,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 68 S 10 FT OF N Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .10 YB: Ph: Owner : King-Eden Partnership Parcel# : 052305 9069 02 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 04/18/91 Mail : 1417 Via Zumaya Palos Verdes Estates Ca 90274 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 69 W 60 FT OF E Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .04 YB: Ph: Owner : King-Eden Partnership Parcel# : 052305 9070 09 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 04/18/91 Mail : 1417 Via Zumaya Palos Verdes Estates Ca 90274 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 70 N 30 FT OF NW Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .07 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan/King (WA) Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 052305 9071 08 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 71 E 108.80 FT Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .04 YB: Ph: Owner : Jackson Pamela S Parcel# : 052305 9073 06 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/28/98 Mail : 2707 Meadow PIN Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $215,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $65,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 73 PORTION OF NE Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .36 YB: Ph: Owner : Geffre Steven A Parcel# : 052305 9074 05 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : 08/06/86 Mail : 2719 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 74 SELY 20 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .04 YB: Ph: 425-271-7385 Owner : Cannon Allen W&Wai L Parcel# : 229650 0007 01 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : 2607 Jones Ave NE Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $141,000 Lgl : LOT 1-2 ELDON ACRES ADD TRACT 2 OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,780 Ac: .36 YB:1956 Ph: Owner : Frank Catherine L Parcel# : 229650 0038 04 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 04/22/97 Mail : 2611 Jones Ave NE Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $184,500 Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $50,000 Lgl : LOT 5-6 ELDON ACRES PARCEL D CITY Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .30 YB: Ph: Owner : State Of Washington Parcel# : 229650 0054 03 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : Mail : Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : LOT 10 ELDON ACRES ADD LY WLY OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .21 YB: Ph: Owner : City Of Renton Parcel# : 229650 0056 01 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $35,000 Lgl : LOT 10 ELDON ACRES ADDS 1/2 LESS Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .34 YB: Ph: Owner : Yount Scott A&Deborah E Parcel# : 229650 0076 07 Site : 2604 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 12/28/88 Mail : 2604 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $80,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $151,000 Lgl : LOT 15-16 ELDON ACRES ADD N 41.5 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,650 Ac: .20 YB:1963 Ph: 206-228-4214 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • MetroScan/King (WA) Owner : Burshek John A&Kimberly R Parcel# : 229650 0080 01 Site : 2610 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 02/12/88 Mail : 2610 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $71,600 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $133,000 Lgl : LOT 16 ELDON ACRES ADD LESS S 41 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,390 Ac: .19 YB:1967 Ph: 425-271-3162 Owner : Clow Allen Parcel# : 229650 0082 09 Site : 2616 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2616 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $147,000 Lgl : LOT 17 ELDON ACRES ADDS 82 1/2 FT Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,630 Ac: .19 YB:1965 Ph: 425-226-6624 Owner : White Terri L Parcel# : 229650 0084 07 Site : 2704 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 01/07/94 Mail : 2704 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $129,000 Lgl : LOT 17-18 ELDON ACRES ADD N 41.5 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,270 Ac: .19 YB:1966 Ph: Owner : Rankin Lorenz N Parcel# : 229650 0085 06 Site : 2710 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2710 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $116,000 Lgl : LOT 18 ELDON ACRES ADD LESS S 41 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,240 Ac: .18 YB:1966 Ph: 425-228-5087 Owner : Chalmer H Parcel# : 229650 0100 07 Site : 2712 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2712 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $96,000 Lgl : LOT 19 ELDON ACRES ADD&ABAND PAC Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1.5 BldgSF: 1,010 Ac: .23 YB:1918 Ph: Owner : Jacobson Rita A Parcel# : 229650 0103 04 Site : 2711 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 10/31/97 Mail : 2711 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $154,800 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $122,000 Lgl : LOT 20 ELDON ACRES ADD N 67 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,300 Ac: .18 YB:1954 Ph: Owner : Howell Denton C& Shawn M Parcel# : 229650 0105 02 Site : 2613 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 12/31/90 Mail : 2613 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $186,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $205,000 Lgl : LOT 20-21 &ELDON ACRES ADD POR OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,200 Ac: 1.10 YB:1958 Ph: 425-271-9637 Owner : Gathmann Jerry Parcel# : 229650 0106 01 Site : 2615 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 05/18/88 Mail : 2615 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $72,500 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $133,000 Lgl : LOT 20 ELDON ACRES ADD N 67 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,280 Ac: .18 YB:1954 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan/King (WA) . Owner : Torgeson Paul C&Cheryl L Parcel# : 229650 0107 00 Site : 2715 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 03/17/95 Mail : 2715 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $125,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $137,000 Lgl : LOT 20 ELDON ACRES ADD N 67 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,720 Ac: .18 YB:1959 Ph: Owner : Vanik R J Parcel# : 229650 0108 09 Site : 2611 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : PO Box 922 Bellevue Wa 98009 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $119,000 Lgl : LOT 20-21 ELDON ACRES ADD POR BEG Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,300 Ac: .18 YB:1954 Ph: Owner : Klineburger Dianna R Parcel# : 229650 0109 08 Site : 2609 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/01/87 Mail : 2609 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $66,500 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $110,000 Lgl : LOT 21 ELDON ACRES ADD POR BEG AT Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,000 Ac: .16 YB:1954 Ph: Owner : Boehme Joe Parcel# : 229650 0110 05 Site : 2607 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2607 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $195,800 Lgl : LOT 21-22 ELDON ACRES ADD PORS OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 5 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,120 Ac: .40 YB:1970 Ph: 425-255-2168 Owner : Maletta Larry J Parcel# : 229650 0119 06 Site : 2603 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2603 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $148,000 Lgl : LOT 22 ELDON ACRES ADD N 70 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,530 Ac: .17 YB:1967 Ph: 425-255-7889 Owner : Nguyen Mike Son&Phan Linda Parcel# : 229650 0133 08 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 05/21/91 Mail : 2413 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $80,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $75,000 Lgl : LOT 25-26 ELDON ACRES ADD E 150 FT Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .22 YB: Ph: Owner : Palmer Gary D&Marcie M Parcel# : 229650 0140 09 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 03/15/90 Mail : 2507 Park PIN Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $30,000 Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $30,000 Lgl : LOT 28 ELDON ACRES ADD LOT 28 LY Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .64 YB: Ph: 425-271-0454 Owner : Arnold Gary&Renee Parcel# : 229650 0142 07 Site : 2520 Park PIN Renton 98056 Sale Date : 11/14/86 Mail : 2520 Park PI N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $60,400 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $318,000 Lgl : LOT 28-29&ELDON ACRES ADD LOT 1 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 3 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,460 Ac: .32 YB:1988 Ph: 425-255-2211 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • MetroScan/King (WA) . Owner : Palmer Gary D&Marcie M Parcel# : 229650 0143 06 Site : 2507 Park PIN Renton 98056 Sale Date : 11/12/85 Mail : 2507 Park PIN Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $176,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $243,000 Lgl : LOT 28 -29&ELDON ACRES ADD LOT Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 1,880 Ac: .23 YB:1985 Ph: 425-271-0454 Owner : Hopkins Richard D Parcel# : 229650 0144 05 Site : 2511 Park PIN Renton 98056 Sale Date : 04/13/87 Mail : 2511 Park PIN Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $54,500 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $341,000 Lgl : LOT 28-29&ELDON ACRES ADD LOT 4 Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 4,300 Ac: .25 YB:1989 Ph: 425-226-9289 Owner : Grove Julie K Parcel# : 229650 0145 04 Site : 2515 Park PIN Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/30/88 Mail : 2515 Park P1 N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $94,500 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $290,000 Lgl : LOT 28-29&ELDON ACRES ADD LOT Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 3,200 Ac: .15 YB:1943 Ph: 206-228-1392 Owner : Scott James B Parcel# : 229650 0155 01 Site : 1405 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 1405 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $173,000 Lgl : LOT 30 ELDON ACRES ADD 30 LESS N Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,600 Ac: .61 YB:1947 Ph: 425-255-1005 Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 229650 0156 00 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $70,000 Lgl : LOT 30 ELDON ACRES ADD W 100 FT OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .29 YB: Ph: Owner : Labrador Ventures Llc Parcel# : 229650 0160 04 Site : 1323 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 05/13/98 Mail : PO Box 3344 Kirkland Wa 98083 Sale Price : $1,720,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $304,000 Lgl : LOT 30-31 ELDON ACRES ADD 31 &N Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,190 Ac: 1.80 YB:1959 Ph: Owner : Friends Of Youth Parcel# : 229650 0165 09 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : Mail : 16225 NE 87th St#A6 Redmond Wa 98052 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $95,000 Lgl : LOT 32 ELDON ACRES ADD LESS RD Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .83 YB: Ph: Owner : Ammons Everett V Parcel# : 334210 0855 05 Site : 2815 Park Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/12/89 Mail : 2815 Park Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $116,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $163,000 Lgl : BLK 12 LOT 25 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,440 Ac: .11 YB:1981 Ph: 425-228-5892 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • MetroScan/King (WA) . Owner : Scott C W Parcel# : 334210 1115 09 Site : 2913 Park Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 10/28/86 Mail : 37911 Buck Rd NE Hansville Wa 98340 Sale Price : Use : 103 Res,Triplex Asd.V : $269,500 Lgl : BLK 13 LOT 25 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 6 Bth F3H: 3 /3 / Stories: 3 BldgSF: 3,030 Ac: .11 YB:1981 Ph: Owner : Ivanich Helen A Parcel# : 334210 1120 02 Site : 2907 Park Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2907 Park Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $155,500 Lgl : BLK 13 LOT 26-27 HILLMANS LK WN Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,300 Ac: .23 YB:1969 Ph: 425-255-7453 Owner : Koch Bruce W&Marina L Parcel# : 334210 3255 05 Site : 2900 Park Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 04/26/95 Mail : 2900 Park Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $147,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $161,000 Lgl : LOT 40 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,430 Ac: .17 YB:1981 Ph: 206-244-1050 Owner : Lane Kim W&Linda L Parcel# : 334210 3280 04 Site : 2814 Park Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 04/20/93 Mail : 11700 SE 78th P1 Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $68,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $85,000 Lgl : LOT 43 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 680 Ac: .12 YB:1946 Ph: 425-227-9386 Owner : Lyonais Loretta Parcel# : 334210 3281 03 Site : 2820 Park Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2820 Park Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $110,000 Lgl : LOT 43 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,640 Ac: .46 YB:1913 Ph: Owner : Mccord Charles N Parcel# : 334210 3282 02 Site : 2802 Park Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2802 Park Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $176,000 Lgl : LOT 43 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,480 Ac: .97 YB:1915 Ph: Owner : Hanahan Violet M G Parcel# : 334210 3283 01 Site : 2808 Park Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2808 Park Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $139,000 Lgl : LOT 43 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,920 Ac: .23 YB:1946 Ph: 425-255-9978 Owner : Scott Phillip M Parcel# : 334210 3289 05 Site : 1402 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 1402 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $151,000 Lgl : LOT 44 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,640 Ac: .39 YB:1915 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. a MetroScan/King (WA) Owner : Grundhaus William E Parcel# : 334210 3291 01 Site : 1412 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 09/29/95 Mail : 7001 Ripley Ln N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $140,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $133,000 Lgl : LOT 44 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,130 Ac: .20 YB:1959 Ph: 425-226-3279 Owner : Lam Vinh Parcel# : 334210 3292 00 Site : 1422 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 11/15/95 Mail : 1422 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $38,123 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $148,000 Lgl : LOT 44 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,350 Ac: .50 YB:1959 Ph: 425-228-7981 Owner : Denton James M Parcel# : 334210 3293 09 Site : 1416 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 11504 SE 82nd St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $97,000 Lgl : LOT 44 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 820 Ac: .20 YB:1959 Ph: Owner : Stevens Thomas L&Judith A Parcel# : 334210 3294 08 Site : 1408 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 10/21/85 Mail : 1408 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $155,000 Lgl : LOT 44 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,620 Ac: .37 YB:1964 Ph: Owner : Jensen William C&Sandra J Parcel# : 334210 3295 07 Site : 1432 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 02/25/91 Mail : 1432 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $59,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $103,000 Lgl : LOT 45 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 990 Ac: .20 YB:1956 Ph: 425-226-8948 Owner : Brundage James D Parcel# : 334210 3296 06 Site : 1440 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 1440 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $149,000 Lgl : LOT 45 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,680 Ac: .22 YB:1957 Ph: 425-228-3556 Owner : Madaj_warren J&Paula J Parcel# : 334210 3297 05 Site : 1428 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 05/14/93 Mail : 1428 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $108,500 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $114,000 Lgl : LOT 45 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 960 Ac: .43 YB:1958 Ph: 425-255-8635 Owner : Gibbs Wayne R&Mary E Parcel# : 334210 3298 04 Site : 1444 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 02/21/89 Mail : 1444 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $111,000 Lgl : LOT 45 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 5 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,280 Ac: .24 YB:1924 Ph: 425-271-5837 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. a MetroScan/King (WA) • Owner : Lengyel William M Parcel# : 334210 3299 03 Site : 1436 N 28th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 03/20/97 Mail : 1436 N 28th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $138,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $149,000 Lgl : LOT 45 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 32 T: 24N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,440 Ac: .23 YB:1968 Ph: Owner : Abbey Vincent H D Executor Parcel# : 334450 0290 07 Site : *No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : Mail : 9005 21st Ave NW Seattle Wa 98117 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $80,000 Lgl : LOT POR HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 3.95 YB: Ph: 206-783-9035 Owner : Gist George W Parcel# : 884800 0020 05 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 01/27/94 Mail : 1626 NE 27th Ct Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $65 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $100 Lgl : LOT 2 URCH SUBDIVISION W 1 FT Q : NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: YB: Ph: 425-255-6678 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. NE 6-23-5 d1 �, @s Sd M � •,r 3 �d^ "NiuNoy�tJ�N e •`c, % 0 ,er ".M M O f Il 00604.' 00 4. .0 so - eat ytt+C\ C4 i• ik° /el:0 tk°\ •I0,. ,,f+Z' /''..4'..141 ei,, f� lets us f•• II `ov le9t y� '1 i«aN 5" .-�yY.3 •�l0. r' 1�oreet,fy. a/I •4 ........„....„......,/:90.00 oi., '4110 \L MN. aAI, N a ' f 1- ff✓'' I •<. & (� i .c ��.pa A� - r.4,,y�' . A I of � .Y y ,y Yj° x l . 1 rw r Oi�� N. Y a+✓ 22 .,. I' -d P) ,�«MCI u' ° Y t' �V Coo .'+,� ,,,. ffr 1 _ •,-, 1.: 44 ? vs + 1 M rN •die1` q e•.,�o 4 C1 i .tc � f,ln..f b.c.l wrd: A. a� I' N . Si 11..' t1f Co . + Slji V Al- V.'. « %"ises�lw• aa«...i"�••f tt I ''81.1. L. • e, .a- �ray1� r - - ..f fff.. n ,.."*" ida' i .iiiu� _ ���I � �—w• s ss_�1 _� Yf14ii t sse K - - �m 1111 0..N A.,SW) C•a.....•.J ' i�I f �a7 rr rr- a 'V of--1---- rr sar — —__ wr �) II„�f••' { t a.n�rfn f.. t -J CA , I 54 s"Ci®vi y---.^N.tO ''»''f /rr t C W 9 1 eti+ttt t- �e'L�'. Q .. tt= ; i t . �1a I r ` 3 '� a e� ,/r •• \ •RI u •? ig A ; s5Alai. ,l • ` r. It � ©4 ' >• Ili. I -- - .' Y '� \\ , oaf° / + - ti Ns it - P } 6 1 y ro ! tab O. • ti w I I. 1,04 t ,4 O 1 %#, < N nOa0.f00): — nW i kt 1 b i -, O� W v I 1 Ohs �3= yea /0 ". ‘. S II < 1 • '454 'd _ ••✓w ' --- — �/ w ; `" L'uy Q .,f/.`• S. R.405 (its' •N.I)(SK.- 1£NW.N.fA) t" . /p. Af.a';r�ss.J..Li': I•rn.sl Nao-•fN u r �-- F5NTON T KKENtiI'1 ALE.y'`PP. -,,,�1fr s.: ` sm.m I I Nr•IfN - A �.i um:JVf- • NI p 111 , ...,sue mow.. r ad."`. 14,6 1 NIO11 A' NE 6-23-5 c s,..t. Noy° °.\Sd �- 0 ,ty or 0000ta ". O"J °�; yin ' t p, 0 of ,t ,r r vtie %Oa „ .°' a tow.'"' y yc ' � ,"•d ' ,l .nN / 499\ II l0 �m ,s� • 0 ° r A't4'.'. v r { � •1l N\H6d�1'0 1 A; .° ®�' y,'16."p'A So H ry .yi/s OS.4- y I 5511 �y.N I'4' q e'e o-,,, % v� I .3, '...'' '" dk,'V y7c Mwn.,f E.cn.46.c.l .J: Iy it xe.�eesM�ee swv,L. ei ex I 2'3• t +z-sego w '`''7 .[ P w.r�r.a.5/uf�J '9 a '✓yCn! .+w. .I[[ nf.s6!_ 'N'Ne'MAI.l Tµ Or,i.lV6 %'_-� II. dl •- rs..,t �y� �ro..rv.r..re) Cc.�...,..r J 8 �M R• ''/r�_�___ _-a_.t�P_�w x-l�[4__r__ :. ['f ,� a '„N i N 1 itx � 'II"e._S i t "w.r i v CT i la ligig u w 3 n m a� I` I . ,� w E p R i R• .:\ .4:4.,,,, coo k 4 „ I I. P Zia rQ 4 y `* , 'AbicSy. At \\ '1:. j i ©, N. N \‘\ 1 �,�.r ,d Q ?. :„em s 14 a 00 \�J �y y• w t RIN.O+s.s IH-eo .>a~, I ` 1 .ya ,!J 0 ' '�. C N s elosossoo�„ ' ' ;t'0' .IN t L 1 itt[ NM• cm T.) • -.1, w itOj ?i ' % a a — � i w ° +--- 'J w 8 <n L. r[� Q i.a S. R.405 < x .N..)<s[[. „�rw• '�['f NTON TO KENNY,A�Ey "P"rt' " 'S •' :vr_as y ' I 1#,N sen:J�4f i ♦ "s.. 'a'% 9S <i O 0 r ' i,6 %sl. `fly RVKt,eaaH { `�'O ,NM A�= N= _ ® . VP 98 CI ,8.-0', 96 D-I y 94 III 4.,4Q f 98C-t ,, .. -1 ilk' \'_ ■� ___ _.N. _ estop of plato �, ` •"�il" , -� ■■F ■■� 1��'!,7 1136±�1161`■� ■t' J I■ t li, • F t i�rr.,iti I Igi 1 ■■ ■� -.._.-1 . ,i 11 1 �■ �■ •i . ' ,lii1:..iitt ropaply.,.an •',1:� `! . ��i Agra .1 ■ 'UNlllh;l _�11'1 ■■ �■ iill , ( I I f V i a !.lit 1!,Ifi�il k I[-i ` 1� �� �� East Elevation 193'C8 9P 61 4.4 98C.I 98C-I ¢tl' 9461 , ill F.:my, 1.171-' rff: li" ir 5,, I ,l WA I� .gill:. 1 .iwl. I®II_I . I: 4I6I • , 5 p1"I i ate_ L.-, ■ iaiw i . • 11l;` — - - Ill .it's sL_.m_.2— a.-.1 �:'i ll� �. .-7':: ;L-:P-r..m:',. —7l4' l i,i d,l ni,;, .:,.:.'.;„-,i'.:,. qy 1 _ -t 1'1.'T =:_1r....... _ ,11, Imo • _ ii:- . _11 •I®11®1'' —— , 1ay1 Iy 41 —— j ®®I I IF ®1 'S I . Typical Floor Plan_ BuildingIupe"A"- Building 8 (Building i4 simil AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR t• TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma Ail TAMARON POINTE PO..Maul K,•..M RENTON,WASHINGTON WA.166 1200, o.,, a„0 ,,,,„„31., m-409e 910.1 _ spay _- NW _ 9¢C1 P-0' 981)-1_ -J--I - _— _lii _-« X lr_ ■ �1,1 1 — -/�— .ice\ I tap of plate • :: ■■ ii I k M« , `411I,. 'MN I 1■ ■ _� I■ IclINA ar - !h N. -- top of plywood « M MIN ■■ I. ■ rTri I■' ■■ ■■ 1■ a • �` �4-'M ' 1'1 �dqp !;= I� •■■ X�a•Xil ■•■ I■ - * rrmrNNla,'� « mpofply.�d J'ikw..�u 1. .nn.y,.INN j i FXNpIXIN ■■ _ ■■ i ' I 81 ryii ■I■� MI ■■ +Y 'YI'gNXll 1.; p of plywood ..:li 'R MD 1 ■. I� I■ lailin ,, 1 II ■■� ��l I■■, I■ III �I '� I:,p of slab West Elevation sinklpoInt of toot ilLP -., -1./"......r.'—'1 ''z;"•'-'gIIIIIIIIIII Xlrwrll �,1 c II' r9ia I�' s Xum me I 3 71, -ow I1 'ry'r.1o.,M+rrrr/r " Elevation - Building 8 (Building 14 gimlet) South Elevation ' AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR A,°I"••••••tem. TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma _A5 TAMARON POINTE RENTON,WASHINGTON „o «o-a o FAR 20111 oi'a 98 Y 186'� .• CIS 860 ISO 850 8'60 8'BD 860 C6 I1 �pp� ■ W I ti ®III { _. _�] ` : I--- 4c1 I .-t —TM �1� "1 i11 rt+-.ttL ®�i_ M10 II: 6'11 i 1C- a$?V ®I, mo Second Floor Plan [ - -nMo .RE ■AMB ■ •=1-.;.:1 5' i1 = - 9 rm -- - , — Ili MOW Third Poor Plan CIS / 660 , KO 4, 860 860 f 650 BSO CIS J - ' * —� I r I I _ a ' — •ICI IBM X'_ i'., 6T Building Type"C" Building 15 -' s 1 , l b r _ V---- -.a ii x %wk.rllr � Type"E"Similar J� 'ti , • um ifios:• i .II:•• *Worn Parking(When- # 'n..: is20'orGrata. - . , • i t ak.Aid. First Poor Plan AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR Ar•'•'•^'••'^'••'• _ TRAMMELLCROW RESIDENTIAL rma A No 6 TAMARON POINTE , ram, .er..r..s RENTON,WASHINGTON No. "A"■^ COW..00.w ry swawi moo07-2D 90 / CIO MO / eso ol` ew 1, NO eso eso CIO Sla IV � — _ 1 Rillr., 9---- \lip of roe ina ai °'klp°`''is ii rn !En' iiIrn , I / N � Ir „4 Ea ■ ■. . , 1. , 11, i� �� IM I mEt wit- III I III Id,,,,IIIi �., . .n'iNlI II It I nu �� � ‘� i I i i,'uI IV I il CI j � 0 1001ei - Illitillo , . ---- swamp Bnieh grade North Elevation West Elevation / f KO d. eSO 1, o 1, Beo 4" eso 4. ea , j /N\ •� • 41. _ tl� III L jr_ imp, E I no'Y i ' 44.,•, 4"v ii 1 i Imo- I �� r i r orpoNsii,.111, '.Vr Fri E.. m 1 , �� e I 6',i'• � [�1 1 lj IIII�, I i — ;u 1 1._. : iei�IggNioll ' 1 lilliiii Id a-4--- -___-_,_i j'ill :, II�',y, I I� MI 'i� wee. o Elevation East Elevation Type"C" Elevation - Building.tS Type"E"Similar AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "ra.*•^"•< TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma Al TAMARON POINTE RENTON,WASHINGTON Soo.WA.166 .,,,o330„ bFAX„a„s, 07'-2 98 16&l• MR 1BOOR BIOR y BIM . BIOR 1 Bat y BIM Y MS t I r1 _ :€: 4. .. .. - A-;.r : 1211.4. * cm BIOR BIOR BIOR BIOR BIOR y BIOR MG r a.. r ,,,,, Second Floor Plan _ ii,~ ; E IAt. .NEE. 4 t Third Floor Plan I'"`' MR y BIOR Bat y BIOR .OR / MOB y_ RiOR ,,, MSR .111 p • ICI i —'iii, I.'' III III ilit n nfa !�I l�R -= I� it in, (�I MI' �i n n • .. a Quildinegpe D - Builtke I�' • 4 OM • ; ,N PI r: ICI II�U -_-n Type hen&n�n � IA I I � • = I • l�l, Similar 71-i 17 i.. .c.:, . PICI _ _ NI 21' ___ 4, _ arc 1.1 , Ili. - andarn Perking(Where •••�j C• iipth is 20'or Greater- t Drive Aisle First Floor Plan AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR e TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma TAMARON POINTE19.6 OW A8 RENTON,WASHINGTON W 9456 °oe 1206, ,60-0 FAX,, ,, 07.20-98 y CIO " BIOR _ gag- '� BIOR- '` BIOR '� MOP '4` et t R ,, vi-i ♦ M ,/ �/ ��/\_ .. j\� _ \midpoint of roof i. �i', NIN1Nk. "�4C��� • L i ,S, F, F ._ o ii vim PrNiitgYlN titt AI IIIP 114,111';;J — F i— f�� '� �I r Iii Nh -- L.III :�' I !HI PdI,Y �� Pain r r►, IIII !PIMP, °II 11�1'��II "' ' l I _ 1�P1 1 ! r '' .,average finish grade I L!I 1� ..1 ■� West Elevation rideouth levation / Ct5R 610R V BIOR 1, BtOR f BIOR 1, BM L. MOP MR igfo . /N ZAN ,„/N. lit • '*- Ir. 0. I* s;f i... i Clil rill. , _,.. I/ VI ! [ . — r—— —--- - \ 1 = ,-, MOM East Elevation North Elevation Tape"V"EIevat►ion__BuiWing 10 Type"B"&"F"Similar Mr,- • AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR Mem.. TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma y A9 TAMARON POINTEMA30 AM Are WE RENTON,WASHINGTON „o,,,,o.o„o FAY SO OW O.2a-9e PLANTING SCHEDULE teglIM4 P t%I• b..'do: SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE&DESCRIPTION BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE A DESCRIPTION pp or O PARKING LOT TREES SIFEP SIOPE PI AMINOK FRA%INUS PENNSTLVANIG GREEN ASH 2"CAL.:FULL:MATCHED;STREET TREE OOV_ O RHUS TYPHINUS STAGHORN SUMAC BAREROOT,18'-24'M. MARS PENN SEEDLESS' Mik O LIOVIDAMBAR SMACIFLDA SWEET GUY 2"CAL:TOLL:MATCHED,STREET TREE OVAL. O ROSA RUGOSA WILD ROSE BAAEROOT.18'-11'Hf. ZFLK(NA SERRATA CHINESE 2EIKCAAA 2"CAL:FULL:MATCHED.STREET TREE OVA. OO SYMPHORICARPOS ALRUS SNOWBERRY BWER00T,18"-24'NT. THOMAS RENGSTORF AND ASSOCIATES LOW SHRUB MASSING ORNAMENTAL TREE ® CISTUS NYBRIDUS ROCK ROSE 1 GAL.36"TRI.SP.O.C. O CRATAEGUS LICNCATA'PAUL'S SCARLET' PAUL'S SCARLET HAWTHORN 2"CAL.;FULL:MATCHED:12'-I4'HT.MIN. OS VIBURNUM DAVIDII DAND'S VIBURNUM 1 GAL JB'1RI.SP.O.C. uu.00a OMALUS FLORIBUNDA JARARESE FLOWERING CRABAPPLE 2"CAL.;NIL MATCHED:IV-IC PT.MIN. GROUND COVER nmcrs.7m..w ru mxw�ni O El SOD LAWN PRUNUS SUBHIRTELLA'NRUMNAIS' AUTUMN FLOWERING CHERRY 2'GAL;FULL MATCHED Ej WIVE MIX, I GAL 24"O.C.TR.SP. YAgNN REPENS CREEPING YAHONIAI nECEIIIH li ACCENT TREES CAULTHERM SHALLON SUUAL .. , :,OCARPINUS BETULUS'FASTIGUTA' COLUMNAR HORNBEAM 2"CAL.:FULL;MATCHED BARCGYS LOW-CROW HYDROSEEO MI% _ I U CERCIDIPHYLLUM JAPONICUM KUTSUTA 2'CAL.;FULL:MATCHED:12'-14'HR.MIN. Q PING CO.BgSWAIF HYDROSEED MI% 440111" EVERGREEN FOUNDATION TRFF ® SEASONAL COLOR. FIELD-COCA BY L. NEW ZFAAND FLAX ,� WA SMINGTOX CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLANDII LEYLAND CYPRESS 6-6'HI lull ROl sheared JAPANESE IRIS J ARTEMSM • �� PILAUS CONTORTA SHORE PINE 6-8'ht lulls I W W �` PSEUDOTSUCA NENZIE511 DOUGLAS i1R 6-8'Height.B&B,lull - .. _ n.„„,„„ I � ♦i0 THUJA PLIGTA WESTERN RED GEAR 6-8'HWBht.ABA.lull I : I (n TAMARO N POINTE L_ W OIG ACER CIRONATUM VINE MAPLE ♦-5'M.,LONL./BLAB Z ARBUTUS UNEDO STMWBEFRY TREE 5 GAL.CONT.,21-24"HT. STEEP SLOPES -- DO NOT I TUR LANDSCAPE PLAN GURUS SEMPEFVIRENS SUFFRUTICOSA DWARF ENG.B0%W000 5 GAL CONT. PLANTING SCHEDULE © CHANOMELES SP. FLOWERING QUINCE 5 GAL COB..21-24"HT. ! O CORNUS STOLONIFERA RED-OSIER DOGWOOD I-2 GAL.CONT. I i O CORYLUS CORNUTA WESTERN HAZEL 5 CA.COAT..21-24"RH. I r OM Mao Ar e EUONYMUS JAPONICA'AUREO-VARIEGTA' EVERGREEN EUONYWUS 5 GAL CONT.21-24"NT. ,A11.A Q WHO. s C}4 ,•• Q HYDRANGEA MACROPHYLG BIGOTS HYDRANGEA 5 GAL.COAT.,FULL U' MAGNOLIA STELIATA STAR MAGNOLIA 5 GEL CONT.,21-24'HT. _ NM AOVIFOLIUM ORECON GRARE 1-2 GAL LONE. i `�' = ''�'' _ o • CAUFOPNICA CNIFORNLN WAS MYRTLE 1-2 GAL.COST. :• i �:GA i n OSMANTHUS DEIAVAYI DEUVAY OSMARTHUS 5 GAL ROM.,21-24"HT. T` -41I -t -� I ® PHIGDELPHUS LEW511 WILD MOCK ORANGE 5 GAL CONT.,21_24"HT, r• � Asnl"r" 7 el O A • HERS JAPONICA UV-OF-THE-ALLEY SHRUB 5 GAL CONT.,21-21"HT. 11 0o PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS'SCHIPKAN515' SCHIPG LAUREL 5 CAL.CONT.,21-24"M. }y1C 'I a RHODODENDRON'CUNNINGHAM'S WHITE' RHODODENDRON 5 GAL CONT.,21-24"HT (T�E�iE=+" A 0 RISES SANGUINEUM RED-FLOWERING CURRANT 5 GAL COST 21-N'M Y-,•_ - / `�Y7; A as ROSA RUGUSA WILD ROSE 1-2 GAL.CONT. �_� Zone , • ® SPIMG NIPPONIG TOSAEN515 SNOWBOUND SPIRAFA 5 CA.ROM.:FULL ���lr. �•J P r Ji yMA SNOWBOUND' •.. VJ�� ® SYBPHORICHAP05 ABUS SNOWBERRY 1-2 CALL.COAT. ���'' �r �� 1 aimimemom '7r¢'r::' 'O. 1 • VACCINIUM OVATUM EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY 1-2 GAL.ROM ' COMM O VIBURNUM PUCANM TOMENTOSUM DOUBLEFILE VIBURNUM 5 GAL CONT.,21-24'NT. W' ' ' _ IWO O vleuRNUB nrNus uuausnNus 5 GAL CONT.,21-24'M. , ' � RJIs'._ Nei. it pho 6 1 1 Bbm e / P.T VTA v Willi lE N,,Vile 'w.E• a. go 1.1�r Fur.. MM. STEEP SLOPES --i ___. '0 0 � :`•. \ ♦� mlyv,��� ,�mm m , ,,... DO NOT D OR CLEAR - - • ` ,•^� mCE.e,re e4.-tit./P1're S£ •® • � ,.. ,.. MATCFLlE --SEE SHEET Lt3 , \ \ \ a oL • ;� cr I L 1 O LANDSCAPE PLAN `-s SCALE:l^-20Y" 0 W 10' 2W N' WEE,OF 6 dtil Pk: 0/1 IC IIII - THOMAS RENGSTORF AND ASSOCIATES c L iii J x R-8 Zone I w e„J; x : fQ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ _ _I TAMARON EOHYEE W I . .. < DISTURB OR CLEAR yY11 Z. 3 ^ air►�x� ;ly�t. ^,„ I = LANDSCAPEP AN i +. +,*, 1, U tu t. Ailie illi +r G` '�°' .� ^ ,iltittt �f;.� 3 v r- • •• - `,±a:�• tk ,; 4.1) / ,,,,42, z50 � ea it \ 'a `� ��� �/' 0- 11) 0 _ ._i,--/I- . • FY iii 1 I It .al . ,, UJ$ vo+++ e. e Q-- ® , 0 oloas . \\I o ,,,,,/ gy tr,,,••• 4. In t a ,' '9, eof :AI% ( CIF I 1'; v*? • te.:, - „„--- v-v• e •16t,- ( Its.4 "0, . a l'":*---. ..c,„7,-tr, .. ......r..20,.......:.:•51_ °C'''''''''.1;Al ' ' v. „FIT - • ,� �S.. ' �1 (� 1 3 UNIT G-' -4 UNIT D-' �� \ \ ',3 _, 054) .....g�•'� 4 1 9 UNIT G•1 A.Y___4 0.4ii C"1 �. •, Mai \ 1' 4. �Qo� ' oa We,. ' 0 4yy1TG � di mu viT��s�ww,�a�."y`�� o,�i`���� l�� rn•t: �"' -��1 _ r �+ •, 9 (,440119, .�. ,....aAr�. • •au �,. C•er"1 a� �r� .' 1' I' •i•iw t _ ,:•� .•�•.••••w• i'$,Do:ws .;• • �'SAx a .� •a; .. J fos• www•wa••a�a:•s. _ D 4 µ c� r y as s i•4•4iwi i•:•iwi aws T�a V . ' ..:. -a ligl" -,`,:i.,;''''argrIPILI',ITf. -' '''rtc*-r04:077-.,-77:'7-7,•°- it- / , ..7._ _ ___ _. _,( . I. 19, • LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE:1^-WW � _ 0 0' 1M 2/• 40' sx..nnr. • 44 POr= 1R-8 Zone RM-I Zone / Existing Apartment project Txonus xENcsrorsE on adjacent property \ AND ASSOCIATES .yam C§ J,. 'i6i"y ,- AyIY, ��a, C-,y0V yy� y�#r' � 1: . 0- t4 .. j :' s S,". L `r��A mil . j� a, } f v" Q� . . 7�" a s s rt V`- !Sew' �.. i -} J= lV ` w � O ID", ' r4 RM-I Zo,e R ,?�I�. �4. 1� G' eeriyI+•ye�eiia - cLi � l � e 1Ag� :y •+ c , � Plit i'. ,,.S C lE•,a,.3 1t11 r.iZ"r2l1r e'm eu i em 1I:, p:0 ONli.'.e.:, . -s, 0 f�j - 1 -*1t ..n.o... f'S ..i+'fir i TQ �Q (',:I' 3::I1 \ q 07 - TAMARON POINTE ,1107 , I ��e?% e . ma y -_ ) —,Iry / `:1,- r T to LANDSCAPE PLAN e� .�� l•�u 1��� rl�r 06^ e Y'v _ a 410, a_ we; 0 , • . y\ rye 41 • • ' ���� ,`,jJ� j ,� ,� , L o= --C---if° \- ,. It 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.2 SCALE:I•=2:E-11- w _ _,._ MATCHLINE-- SEE 3,....,.-. •44 1, U6 (0,, '� �i 9`:•'ml�9.•S�ii a `i �=i, .• i • tI i ego •'a.w•"i�d0n� 'n�� �� \ \ oe: a tttR�°'�nVA,lC./A� � -:�.-'�C r, 1 rxonuartencsroeP 't, 11:110.0000iiiiiiiii itfirW u.'leit. 1/,��'°eklero _ r ropirG ¢ T.CC �.rot '\ Ano ASSOCIATES ocrn, r ••a CC r'r` d� ?` ••�_° \ \ a tee, T,CC �Q O'.; ¢ o I�P k. ="c1 .,.a.W.. STEEP SL ES -- 7 •/•'0 e' e o p� DO NOT DI TURB OR CLEARIft ® ¢¢� • pQ�• j� �` C k�NIP cogial! ¢ ` ¢eollik-�p��� �,,,o � o°r1r1. Om C, �� I ICIM C7ly ''.4.....:..A, fr_ ,.. ..... "._ __ .... . , 17 0 ;•• „op:, v,iordAre.pP , .4,0, 0 .r. . 14-r I' PS�y ?'fj°r•.i'�ra°�qiq li��i� fijitio-1i !0 12 .off;.• 00• � •"� ��`� �� -�CY;r; M rAnuaonromrE wiir A� ., 0f• `l`•wifli, ': • '`L. QQ" L}. C ut.a\ •r • PA�GIdf4 L .e. •rr* `•. lii` \' oto f f. S•e. `�•fO^�0 ets,�'Fy240(ud k1,, LANDSCAPE PLAN ** u ;N. 40 p / A m ` `. L7A i opi a�aPN ewC110E--`urilk'.t,r/;•iv 0 A e+ pc.rd t T 1��f p .* ,�� J�M1,ti CjCJdii40,4s,f s C� fltIN 4 k t"d • yL .. ' 0:I u! c gym ri�t4��i�OGP CJ�ik3 lfJWiJC!•t1�lO FiiE?9¢Yw>Lp�y�k�'FJ� �i �. ... •••.d • • ©� Q L'10 '3 Eti. ', O. �Yp1Y V c. `Li Q p pu +�fjr a (a�i• Q+'1'ilj���!ra•i�o.��r`•�.,,�_q�li. Q > on GAF ? t`c; © *4 t�op.� AD(��1 Le�amti•�J(� p �i ��'' I Er �� _ Lac Unfl�D4►Glpdpmn-940,0 �:Z')610. ��� d ,4:.1.....t.s.... ocotio `fir i ` I .a. / \ • `•.CAE. ,• / /... ss a o j/ Ineon mum.roma 1 L1.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE:1^_M4•• ��e 0 T toot` t;- pra o5 _•siaa•. r . -- i i•A. L� -e..Ssoit'' A •' ? •.� lm�`D .••�isiiiiiii• •�ei'.we?.•' �:..: .�"• \, t:. •E ►+T�' I . r .. •.....0.��:•'• V�I 0 • a1 irk € OhIIL. �. � .}C / ^; f-. �iJ/.,fat e �-y.��r, l ••.-' �-'' YV• ��•�1 e, .#, __,, i�. _ ,ii 4. v a. ram. t•.. r Q ..., • \ \'� \ �`er � •� s A \ e5° e :t MAs REn RE \0 1i* 'n';'.' \ \ s, \ " c)mir AND ASSOCIATES TRO ASSOCIATES I� L 7,. .ti 0 ••••c. `3+� w $, �lA � p.. co •` N ey° iem• vtD,y • x (.1 l •�" ,i�� Z - W'1 fir. •, �ibio,glbOavJ I Wo.�-/I . lam c¢mm a• _•'9I • 41�' ��:: ..w•.,4 c0 u1 III/ 9'tr.rG1 i �i �a r 0,4„ O,crta© . ..� C, ��y�� rv�ykD w S+C,i 1'J^ 7/ 1O,;G)y1',41�i m�� v�QiQm ,0 11 �IyIE.IiW arl•c O'�iii►R7dOaCy�Qi(BGiyn+�laW,f.L ,Q yJ Ti :! . � ry>`� �1� \ !•.v QII� 4U'�Otim�Y la'i%Y G•1V�J� isn Z �•. •GTC"'1E►�� 0°4 e� L fjr '! O�Y"JN,mILOro+yOCu.�J,wl I J 4n�a� x A. 0y0 O taco O 1 Oy �% r • ��. ws 00 ryy0 0uar✓ x �� t • :\ 11002 �' C. pa0l(yIrJO.eilOO�y OQ�^'G"GitLDtvv' ----- elk:: �i •• �' `�. C'��L urn ©�• O� w s?�IfJna05? OvyIb+,�Omi i I x VS. •s. Ta e� c© i� ` 00 o _ O r nftd.O0.r1n A0.,,0 tp 0„0,,,4.• - % . .. o�o C Gr" ° - r,,4�,A, QD IDm�,ta-,mry0_, �. m�: i•% P e.�• •.0, `''>�' .^ if m ra N! ) ?APO tOWOLZ Qt9 ZOOOOOOp'10�0• -,/ . - •a . 3 00 J u. D 00060 ./. _ �. ' • . �`••• fD�y�'.:�Oddc"ar'��grJmG"'r4.��3`a?fAOi•'tliry��r'ta;?aaSryCdir:•s'ti ~ ,e 4401 m , OGi$lOti0', ., r�.Dr s00,�d 04,-,, te„,ar Wi+eeto4i. _-i .�m < � 'aa ca• ° a O Ott �r' TAMAROSEOINTE . alral ri) yr fall ,( •s 0 a -- o'° !•T� v O zinc 90,, rtwz e ' .ii p` agae a 64 0I10+O(i 0�yC# ,)'fd0., • � `: L]Or � O4y �� I�Ory O Iic' s'?O - G A it SIOGh^iced O CIS x OE3. .ram rill rrlimm 00 I1 O 0 O-. N ..,,�.. ne,C31 ••rA ,iNr lIIRN •011i•,pC•441•940 Or11JIO 0, ^� Ov. Gv5'u JO /� ' = 4+ F. 0 O rtCti pQ +0" bf8 0:94,9, 60.00 40A04/,y'��,OQ'���4'y.� w ©41, N +O© O a`6"U 2'!i© 14)1i AD O PP,..trJ 1)fa40 .eLA •1 �G14�p c, GJO� a O 'JI yrJGF. � � O 4ti�f.1 ♦� O iO4�rJr+�Od'�®�fij;^JIa01C•tPGo,-6�`O, to O� QpyD O Qim �JI� rJLi!v'!P.v LANDSCAPE PI �,�� a cwo oy Ewa t ..� w . ra r,+�'' �' ,�o c t4421C ael) oa11)6 mmo era m O, ml 0 d I / / 0 .r Q 0 0 , fir\ LANDSCAPE PLAN L 1.4 SCALE:I••-WO' 0 ill WA LT L ITT 6DS NEW PIEa, Ell�JJLG IVA 1111111\- ti A O �A L IT2TCIE6 NEW PESSI USGRADS GRO TROMAS IATES RENGSTORP \\ Berm AND AAA'M„,, t` �I:��•';4 Planting Mulch-Depth=2" FErt1L12ER-Plxe PaVE TO east r.� nLCH Apl:-..nLM i�•��W.G��`���7� ��,� Of P3 SpGLlfied awlLLCN-3.LATER 2%ROOTSPREAD RELLEASE FERTILIZER tIL� \`.j / S�lP�„\ \ .1I r, FEAnEIe i0 TFEiE iIW�Fc GRWUIES-PLACE w...mo• am n-ermc PRIOR TO BARN \ MULCH APPLICATION -�BMAI•• .. `•'"" INS.GRADE /\•\\•\♦•• .\.♦ / .._lo_;, =11I III IP .�.�..�m��..�.,.�m�m_. \ ' �I — - - - BARK OR ROOOCHIP MULCH \\♦♦ \\\\\\ ` — F=� FEEL daAP SACK PROM TOP MINIMUM 2 DEPTH,FEATHER TO /\2"Mln.\ \2"Min. �Q( I I NALF G ROOT BALL AFTER BASE of RANT. / �•II��.=111, PLeE TREE b E R TREATED[L�3p��� Haar COMPLETELY ll=ll=l� - Ti FINISH GRADE (gyp 0i�'ah n_ E= Ile P \ it_4- NATIVE SOIL �j m Saud a SOIL 1-TEORarraT WATER 11 \% III1�EMEI11=111=i— IL AFTER PLANTING,. :17.n �� / ; = .-1-11=m— —� COMPACTED SAaaILL SDIL I_ -ti 11 4jV\��Q / Mixed Native BaGkPlll x TEt6 mama-1 OA _1=-. Material• //` /\ /, /, /. // O SHRUB PLANTING BAREROOT PLANTING „W. / y- R6.TA %/ /s Planting On Level erode .,n „o,•" Planting Mulch-Depth=2" NY.r.TR.. Or a,`Specified C A AS' ,'.re;/ ,`` TAMAR OWN POINTE Berm �1�i�df , /�:•�� l��, _ ice.•.'� .� III v v�AA,- �'S I - _ em PLANTING DETAILS • • / 2"Min. v 2Mln v / rF . II ."" S 2•x2•erAKEs p 0 / ' DRIVE(MIN 2)PR.LT :,.1' i,��R r ,a --i / .rI.,B on sip. ro°KEAPurFIRS°I` '. ':�'. -ia �u< Mixed Native Backfill n Material• ✓ sI Ilex"'P"� STAKE ABOVE FIRST ERA r es !Re j1 �1, 'i` ' w A GeOte / ‘\ \•\ \\\ •\•\\.\ \• / I (f A R ' / // Level P1mtlry Pit OR •AS NECESSARY POR FIRM SUPPORT i� \ \ \ \ \ \\ 1/2•DIA.SLAC K RLESER HOSE T V I \\\\ \ LOCATE HALREUY UP TREE i/ 2 STRAND TWISTED 12 GUASE `�1 12 GA.OUYIRS HIRES R ".,Y V •+r1♦ / RUBBER NSE ASID IN 2'DIA Planting On A Slope 26RAND TWIST \ J f�,w +. .i /;I FERTILIZER-PLACE PRIOR TO BARK M 1 L SALL 15i LEwTWTITIXH Na , MALE APPLICATION. �'� ' `1 1 / G'"1 ANIS.,.�..,P ]•DARK MACH A f f ✓r• // FERTILIZER-PLACE PRIOR TO BARK \ \/ �,.,,p1 ry t / MLCH APP.ICATICH 0 0 POFS,SAII'.ER WITH .y*��(�y N - S•CONTINK%Y RIM "' SARA MLLH-2•LAYER RANT SO TEAT TOP OF ROOT FEARER TO TREE TILLMK. \/\o/\o/ \/ DAD- P NI 1•a GRADE /'�� FORM SAUCER P11114 CONE .RIM 1.. CuT AND REMOVE ALL HALF OF BALD �_- i- s•••. \,\��L\f,} \ BURLAP FROM TOP HALF P BALL. --- \/ \/ smsm WATER R TAT,SEE PSPECI SPECIFIED PLANTING mixOCKETS TO REsuoVE CUT AMP REgVE ALL WRAPPN6. Il / /\ (x) %\EaPaNtGr6/\ ii 2xAx sv EaAP PROM TOP RILE OF BALL K-_-// MUTER f TA,POCKETS \\���/✓ ET..(.3,.E) O REMOVE AIR 1 3'TAMPED TL E 1L 4 SPACE DEN, SEE SPECIFIED P,NTINS Mix. �„ S'TAIFED T�p1L Y Planting Pattern s AR1F TD. APR -- 'P SCAR,TOrcern, Drt rc.(4 P3 pacified P.plmt tdar VARIES ROOT EAU•12' I. 2%MLL DUA T 1 C O GROUNDCOVER PLANTING ®CONIFER TREE PLANTING DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING L 1 J MOUSE BWlLfNG 14 &IIID140 12 � „ter i warvrvucJ1 WIRY DPI% —PROPERIVUK fte eetion CC lake Wallington Blvd. MU OE MATER TAMARON PPOINTE 'NNNN.—' ----- --_7.--_-- __----------____—_*-N_ ir ......________ ----- / ..... '_ / tiralt "1116Wr*.4. , dir -.'*1.414147111.1 % ---------------- __,---- - 44:04.4116,Ar 4111116'6 it..44Alowzmi------r--„,......,..--,----------_________„ -------------:::--: a a..._ il111Wk,lrorsssssaAMW a I:p ..-ii, 4 6' -,4%I,. -_____ FFEL ___440114, „...... w ..._______.., ........., ,.. leit‘ 0..0 „rmiiii_„Litypsuw,411.-r_. _....„4:.., cio 111 al PaPpoi..._____11,11AVIIkrif .4. s ... $4 . t -. V . et- , spfk ... la natalaw.: Nlose46,0 • Pa: a 44.1r iii.% *\. %, 1 „, ,,14; .,.0__._—___ __-. oi.ls i _._.m.I ir--i_'4 r \3iuuivImilmrr• ai 8 1d_s.i-r'i.ai 1 0 o*s411e4 O '`' 0-CM F ►• • 1 4 w�ur�, A/. 0•4•1%•i."i.__r___ i4l al •,1.1iam/1.r w.1_1.O1o°_11l_1lai1s111s1l1 1 1.--..&7--i=-_,i.1- : ,_, 4!il_.0 z INiamv,-II 1I4I N•V IaII a I•va i4 p.l ll.lnli•ke sui —Nh--t A baitl.hha,.lt lim_aai il s I*iI 7r9 0 - - FP,;. /1 111 sj ' +e ////•rA' ,) p 8°r• f -1 i liipi 1♦ —2_ / a1 /e E/11 111u/ Oil ` y •A k I i i �Ii1�ii�/ FF�82.0 es b �• t ,:, . „,a ■ate..tea r.. : !��.y1 : 1 r ,z 1 '•,- • , _ {/t( f.l.'1s ■o■■■I.t■■■■►.ii I/ Off• • JFFI ■ FF Al • 88 0 0, j L!Ls, 84.i sa II F,_ ■ ■f Ian I.111 O. 1 i isa 1/ / �rMN . �4� BeII o� s..o g• o E8. o / _ III `f leo DSO _ W !_ r— _._.�:�:.-- ..<,.. „ ram,; ----- WA8HtNC3TON BOULEV i i 15 -.*,f-T, „-,-,-,.1 %. ,--zf:.-_ -:,,i;--,.. ?.,;',.: _-;w:z:-..c ,::,-y,-_ ,, ,;,,x, _ , _ - ,, _ ,_, , .. , -.,_ - - -, 1 , , - 12"TrRr- s i q;T6% ...,„ -,,,,,„ „ ,,.. iVLjJ\X1 i>,,,„. .,,,, , 6,.,c,„•0 cp.Q • ',YF am pFlC • y % � cya��.e r.s ,7�,pti c1io s i G' ,y ?• *);,tiF s1e. / -------:10, , - - ------ ---- -"---------_-- . _____ _________< _----// -------------_------__ ------'---- --..., ,......__ ...........,„_____ _ , . _____,_ ,_ _ ______ __,..... _________, \\,,,r, ,_____ _ _____,_______________..___ _______ -- `l�s� , OW Z---------- ----------------.„ -_____------ _____.------- ..," ' ,..ALVIIIIIIM 12 1 III �-r ' em"'* 12 ST ` 9 . . r s k ...80 r `_ \� F FF n0 e� 10. FF ir: I: S 111-----,�FF U 0 F = 1� \i •- 0 10s 0 10: 0 zero •so _—LC;.� E i No �� 10% 0 atis o� OW 4101.1 li • • 14 ;� Ali, • Alb .1 • FF • .p . 1 IIq�4" 1 BUNT D-4 •f�•1�� a a \ /� ^ _ 4 UNIT D-4 ■ • S \ • S � ` Is- so ix e___ ._ sit go �ziji !iiI �� � oa o: 90121.. Ei ore •JR g•lip • ■I�11�■■■ _ 1 - �. _7-4 ..., t-, q §\. 1 � • _ pia . Fy 1f 02,' . . ... - �' F1111 ■ r• ■ A) ii �Q p 92 FF• -Fr= F 11911 ■oa ••�0� 9F • C r (- • _ �J =t, M11 ,,-1.1„....,,-- .-T -. p •• • 90 0 90 0 _ ___ ::_____ .. - .0, Abt \ --- ,mmill 4111111011111111117 ill NO i.1lk..'l.I "r--•w-A I 1,O I 1 I r .r 15 6" - ".:��"�.�i fi►�1 `_l` •, • ``•:4��► - W.------4--- 11111111111111"11111111111.P114 ----.-.--:-_,........ .:„,..,. ..... ram.- ,..,fr . a nmi�...-�� t;"rM- Z' t r } i V :4R:�t /. {I S -;/° /4,�O Fas9!!?'Ck -5oa / 3UIL.DII G 13 BULL DING 16 100 90 •EXISTING.•GRADE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE • • ELEVATION 80 ESJ1MATED PRE-FILL 'GRADE 70 SILL PLACED FOR MOBILE • HOME PARK 60 ION , ..._ ..A HORZ. EERJNG...DESIGN,....INC. .100 • 90 ' 2 80 - 1 1/ �. ,, . - 70 N. BORING- #11 • (1©'..OF nft)••• FILL PLACED. FOR MOBILE .AKE WASHINGTON BLVD. HQME PARK CROSS..._ SEC SCALE: •1-10'• VER 8/29/-.98..PACIFIC...ENGII BUILDING 8 r_PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE 100 ELEVATION • 80 70 r71MATED PRE--FILL GRADE 6Q 3ILE CTICN B - B HORZ. GINEEF I[ q....DESIGN, INC. 1b9 BUILDING F . . . . 90 80 - • • 1/2 .. . 70 • 60 •- =` ,*i. BORINO #10 015' 'OF FILL) L.AKE. WASHiNGTON .BLVD. FILL PLACED•FOR "1 HOME-PARK CROSS..._ ..S SCALE: .11-10'. .1 8/.29/M8 FACIFIC..E REN4pi5.RENSE�PEF I 7911 �'�`��•,��, tt, // • �♦M4 `' sms arc � ��� � ��—, ��y'��r, � grak. 40��.•.;-,%4t/ sores. „, / ---. -, -__ -____. ,,_,:ri ai it-4., ,,,i,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,p.:,v,,, _ -.,.,, ,,,..,. , /-------„________,J, ,,_.,,,,,,,...,..t...m.6,,,,:.4.,,,,, „ /, I- , ,.,,,,,, •,, „,_,, ..:,..:___,..., .,,,,,r,,,,,,..,,,,v.jet..„- , ..„, ,,, , „, ,;)„,, .. , :::,„,..f::,,* 4 410v/ / ,' t p. 11 Crrr'*;7' 1-----"------4 - ---/- -----;---,,,,--iiiii LAOW1...,--"..... WcArArvrV::.:•:::::\.,;::04,. >..-7411114k. 44‘1#,141, „z7 21 -,tet.w , �x� et,..„,- ,: . , ve/' . i�, "ice<. ..:;::', ..\... ,4:(-/-4, DOWD MINN, ii li t '.44t4 ?,.A .t0 II. . . .k 4 V .‘ - . 1 ,s-ok*iso-f=- 041-i#-,10.!- )14%.*:# /' :, - \ li 1 1 ) 1 ,.; 4fr , /tri• , *•,,e ,if, ...2t. , A.,,.__ zE.- .11.. ,, 5 /iii 8 :"'7 !,-.41/# /' 441.; ,t,i ft,r , 1.T.,.,,,, ,,/ „2co,„ / 01 -// ' •474) ,..4,4,iir-* s., - ,z;# ./ 4( • Ae._ ,,,,b_ -, ... 4 , .. /:,/ , .?„, . ..__.:,„.,14, , 1:0;,..v4, / ��y,�`�� Imo•• ,` ��" �� �, /-,,,, : -z- vd" rr Y Q I3 3- 6 • ,* V.I k o ter. i / v - d' A im; w ja / -.. 4..,% .-,.--..:.,, ."<glr •1110V. --,---;,-,-, -"' 0 ZA o o+ �W 98-20 PROJECT NO. 4,7t)' / g -4' \V\i'V;likir,, ,,,,. ' 4, V. fr",:,;, 11.,. 4 z . ..., r 0- DRAWN ST 7-23-913 a'l\ ‘ 1111"li,A11)..,A, ,11-101,7,Pi- fi.e 0./ 17 :/ r" aioeEc /'-' SCALE 1' 50' E�'r""�„r10: / PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. o CIVIL ENGINEERING AN PLANNING CONSULTANTS 98-123 z sel- ' Northm Santa Fe Burlington CITY OF RENTON Thomas Cooke 1700 E Golf Rd#400 200 Mill Ave S 12630 84th Ave S Schaumburg,IL 60173 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98178 FOSS LAUNCH&TUG CO Gary&Marcie Palmer Vincent H D Executor Abbey 660 W Ewing St 2507 Park PI N 9005 21st Ave NW Seattle,WA 98119 Renton,WA 98056 Seattle,WA 98117 Manfred&Anne Hansen AETNA#7954(SEP) Paul Undiano&Judith Johnston 6947 Coal Creek Pkwy SE#800 PO Box 188246 1325 N 24th St Newcastle,WA 98059 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Renton,WA 98056 Lewis Jones Roger Fleming&A Van Carla Helen Shook 1401 N 24th St 1404 N 24th St 1405 N 24th St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Betty Holma David Lincoln Gary Parker 1409 N 24th St 1412 N 24th St 1301 N 26th St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Kathleen Gianini R A Hammond Catherine&Richards Galvin 1311 N 26th St 1313 N 26th St 2407 Garden Ct N Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Richard&Annabelle Wagner James&Cheryl Matheson Kevin&Priscilla Lee 2411 Garden Ct N 2417 Garden Ct N 2420 Garden Ct N Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Walter Grieser CITY OF RENTON FRIENDS OF YOUTH 2423 Garden Ct N 200 Mill Ave S 16225 NE 87th St#A6 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 Redmond,WA 98052 FRIENDS OF YOUTH CITY OF RENTON Jack Ring 16225 NE 87th St#A6 200 Mill Ave S PO Box 4000-378 Redmond,WA 98052 Renton,WA 98055 Pahnunp,NV 89041 George Collier Joseph&Botero Irene Taiwo Robert Radnich 2419 Meadow Ave N 5896 123rd Ave SE 2501 Meadow Ave N Renton,WA 98056 Bellevue,WA 98006 Renton,WA 98056 Richard Tennent&M D Helen Gary&Paula Dubois Gary&Marcie Palmer 2505 Meadow Ave N 2415 Park Pl N 2507 Park PIN Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Richard Hopkins Julie Grove Gary&Renee Arnold 2511 Park PIN 2515 Park PIN 2520 Park PIN Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 ;'^L ,. a.. 1, i1 ,r , i i ,-IN ,' a ...,\, tir:4;i ....'-';'':"...., ' ls\k-,''''''',... Lv� pip 0�Qa ,ay� { 4.• .., /' {{�� Jr \Ay(.)!��7,7 'Ar#, / , is ).*1 4�'t\..tj '' Q� 1'4• 'CS ` a\ ' , i," V 4. J6,, 94 p of v ,' `C y R \ \ -/ 0/' ' , •.46 /�f( ���(uC.R Y o ,.., `.P,l*i , k •• / 1 t��J' / y 00'c�777,�1� o , Ott 0• °�:•�a` �1.141 0A , ivm o�� 4 ) QpJ ..2 8;., t. r12,,r w2* �� $•� * t ap i�. '.vC h +1�y'l�/mil _ \ r'v�. _ s'7.r . . �.lr.r. i�F� \ I�� hcp hw _ ' lip 1 I' all I. II.�\ I I• I 1 1 l I --I I. I .I T.- '441, Pinic Area ®. Building#8 Pool Sprinkler Equipment / .� Room Roorn -.m le." .i0umi is Exercise 49 Dfflce "-''+- Room ;Oil Ik',�04, sue■®1!'al1M, .,...il`'�I�i1 0�\+, U , .. . . . ME� - - l..i:,:. 78 ®t ■ . Pool . ®E UIIUI 1 j4■ . ®1 t I .. ®111■1`Will. �__ // R uiiding and_Sitt Iliall . ^i ��--- --emm mil®®®�0� a MAMA" -..,.gym® -- Mal Klock AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma'�"0 A,o TAMARON POINTS ^ RENTON,WASHINGTON �,,,o- e, m=p-ve BUILDING 14 rBUIIDIIIGi6 T wy •;'" +l • Al , PRONIMUIS—r", I ENTRY DRIVE PROPERTY LINE Site Section A-A Lake Washington Blvd. .... :,.Hi.,s::::47.... PROPERTY LINE BUILDING 7 4.. Araiiis;�� 100. 4 „,, ,miir. . 4„ ' lir -...IX-- - op.., 1 7-I ,fir,, '3�1"„ eau .4416, )01 Site Section B'C PROPERTY LINE AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "'•'TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rnna A3 '""0 ake Washington Blvd. TAMARON POINTE .�.w ec.....s..o. Imo RENTON,WASHINGTON 14 0.01.°,,,,,,,,, Date 0110.98 rox'L,es 6 pVd A Kim and Theo Brown 4 Rich and S Hopkins Sth F ace I, 1003 North 28th Place 4i 4 2511 Park A � orth 980` Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 2indy Korn Charles Jensen Bill Barlwo .th 28th Place 2621 Meadow Place North 2100 Lk Washington Blvd. # WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 ley ar i Odell Milliren Tina and Jerry Cullers Mr. and Mrs. James Scott 0 No ,h 28th Place 2506 Meadow Avenue North 1405 North 28th ton, NA 98056-2173 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Man red and Anne Hansen Dean and Cynthia Schumacher Nancy Stark 122 North 26th Street 1116 North 28th Place Mark Mykel Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 1409 North 26th Street Renton,WA 98056 Dean H. Schellert Donald and Patricia Rosburg M.L. Gibson 1013 North 28th Place 1402 North 26th Street 1215 North 28th Place Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Barbara Smith Robert and Esther Miller Rich Wagner 1308 North 26th Street 1121 North 28th Place Baylis Brand Wagner Architects Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 10801 Main Street Bellevue, WA 98004 LaVerne and Mary Jo Graves Steve and Julie Wasson Marlene Mandt 905 North 28th Place 2515 Park Place North 1408 North 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Patrick McDonald Barry Oman Glyn Gardner 160 Vashon Place NE Friends of Youth 2100 Lake Washington Blvd#84 Renton,WA 98059 2500 Lake Washington Blvd North Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Song Qiao Roger Haynes Bill and Madeline Arrigoni 1412 North 26th St 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N#62 907 North 34th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Sondra Kraft 2100 Lake Washington Blvd N#68 Renton,WA 98056 7.121)21) Board of Public Works Gj - j 23 f S July 12, 2000 Page 2 Discussion: Applicant stated that fire access is currently in place. If the applicant cannot complete the deferred items in a 6-month period,they can request an extension of time. Action: Moved by Christensen,seconded by Gray,to grant the deferral of on/off-site improvements for 6 months, subject to the following conditions: 1) Applicant receives plan approval; 2)permit issuance; 3)applicant shall post a security device for 150%of the deferred items cost estimate; and 4)that a restriction on the sale of lots in the short plat in the form of a Restrictive Covenant be placed until the improvements are completed, and prior to recording of the plat. Motion Carried. • PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT,TAMARON POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,Vacated Pelly Pl. N., RE-00-002, - Applicant requests a Partial Release of Utility Easement. The northerly 15 feet of the easement is needed for maintenance of existing wastewater facilities. Action: Moved by Meckling, seconded by Christensen,to approve the request for a partial release of a city-held utility easement that was reserved via City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 3447 in July 1980. The approval includes a recommendation to the Utilities Committee, of a Partial Release of Easement, subject to the following conditions: 1) The City of Renton shall retain the northerly 15 feet of the subject easement for utilities; and 2) collect the requisite processing fee from the applicant of$100.00. Motion Carried. 4. ADJOURNMENT: Acting Chairman Watts, adjourned the meeting at 9:00 a.m. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th AVENUE N.E., SUITE 110—BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H BISHOP P.E.President TELEPHONE(425)455-5320 DAVID H.ENGER,P.E.Vice President FACSIMILE(425)453-7180 October 26, 1998 Mr. John Wayland TRAMMEL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland, WA. 98033-7866 RE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments - Renton Response to the Lake Terrace Home Owners Association Bicycle and Transportation Items Dear Mr. Wayland: The following are our item by item responses to the issues raised by the Lake Terrace Home Owners Association regarding Bicycle and Transportation items. Our responses are as follows: B 12. Recreation • Item a. Comment regarding the existing four feet wide at-grade regional bicycle trail on both sides of Lake Washington Blvd. N. is noted. • Item b. Both bicyclist and motorists are required to obey the traffic control regulating vehicles, traffic, travel and transportation and their incidents upon the streets, alleys, sidewalks, roadways, and other ways open to the public. Motorists entering or exiting the Tamaron Pointe Apartments are legally required to yield to northbound and southbound (egress left turns) traffic including bicyclists. B 14. Transportation • Item a. The highway connection via N. 30th St. is clearly noted on Figures 3-7 in our Tamaron Pointe Apartment Traffic Impact Analysis report dated June 16, 1998. C:1-Projects\R PROJECTSIR0674981R067498A.doc Mr. John Wayland �( p TRAMMEL CROW RESIDENTIAL I t PACIFIC NORTHWEST October 26, 1998 Page 2 • Item c. Providing adequate on-site parking spaces would reduce the likelihood of resident's parking off-site. Off-site parking could result in a detrimental impact to the bicycle facility on Lake Washington Blvd. North. The trip generation used in our June 16, 1998 report is based on nationally accepted methodology and has been accepted by the City of Renton. • Item e. The comment regarding the Sound Transit Plan proposed to run commuter rail on the track immediately between the property and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is noted. • Item f. The Lake Terrace Home Owners Association accepts the methodology used to calculate the trip generation for the subject proposal. However, they disagree with the trip generation calculation for the existing mobile home park. The City of Renton concluded that the existing site generates 443 trips per day based on the trip generation rates. Our analysis using the trip equations calculated the daily trips at 602. The Trip Generation identifies that the equation provide a better relationship between the number of trips and the size of independent variable when the R2 value approaches 1. The noted R2 value is 0.79 which supports the use of the equation. Regardless, the primary effect of the City calculation is an increase in the required traffic mitigation fee. During the critical PM peak hour the difference in the trip generation using the rate vs. the equation is only four trips. Thus no material effect on our analysis would result. The existing mobile home park is not designated as a retirement community. Therefore, using the ITE retirement community data is not appropriate. • Lake Washington Blvd. widening in the future. We have reviewed both Labrador Subdivision Traffic Impact Analysis dated September 1998 prepared by Timothy Miller, P.E., and the transportation section of the DEIS prepared for the The Bluffs Apartments prepared by The Ferris Company issued May 15, 1990. Based on our review no material changes to our analysis would result due to these other developments. A growth factor of 5% per year was used in our traffic analysis to account for growth induced by other developments in the vicinity of the project site. C:1-Projects\R PROJECTSIR0674981R067498A.doc Mr. John Wayland �( TRAMMEL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST October 26, 1998 Page 3 The Labrador Subdivision Traffic Impact Analysis included the subject proposal, the The Bluffs Apartments, in the background traffic volumes. The LOS analysis conducted in this report for the Burnett Ave. N./Lk. Washington Blvd. W. intersection shows that it would continue to operate at very good LOS conditions. This analysis, by others, is consistent with our analysis conducted for the subject proposal. • The traffic volume count done at the Lake Washington Blvd.N./Burnett Ave. N. intersection for our Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted on June 2, 1998, between 4:00 and 6:00 pm, by Trafficount in accordance with industry standards. Trafficount is a firm that specializes in conducting traffic volume counts. Trafficount also conducted a count at this intersection on September 9, 1998 for the Labrador Subdivision project. Both the counts show consistent traffic volumes. Thus, further supporting the appropriateness of the traffic data used in our traffic impact analysis. If you have any questions please call me. Very truly yours, 1. Me, wAsyf'ccr TRANSPORTATION PLANNING yz • & ENGINEERING, INC. 2cf /8/26/sf" ° Mark J. Jacobs, P.E. S/011AL Associate MJJ:sv 'EXPIRES 4,31 00` C.1—Projects\R PROJECTSIR0674981R067498A.doc • PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. 1 CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS October 23, 1998 Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 -SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. 98-20 Dear Mr. Wayland: This letter responds to the Lake Terrace Home Owners Association Appeal of the Environmental Determination. Responses are made to those issues relating to the earthwork analysis, street frontage and driveway requirements, impervious area calculations and storm water system. The following item numbers refer to the Environmental Checklist. B.1.e Additional soils analysis and studies have shown that excavation and correct replacement of unsuitable material along the west side of the site must happen to provide a stable bank and to accommodate the widening of Lake Washington Boulevard. This revision to the site and earthwork model necessitated that the preliminary earthwork figures be restated. The Earthcalc, Inc. calculations shown in the above mentioned appeal letter are representative of the current site plan application. The Department of Public Works has requested that the most northerly drive be reoriented to an angle between 45 and 90 degrees from its existing 30 degrees. Street widening improvements are to include curb gutter and sidewalk, planter strip and bike lane along the full width of the frontage encroaching into adjacent steep slopes. These requirements also extend the access point easterly into the site resulting in the undermining of existing poorly compacted manmade slopes. Removal of the unsuitable fill and corrective measures taken to rebuild this area will provide future stability and safety. B.1.g A site survey was performed to delineate all existing impervious surfaces which include asphalt drives, carports, sheds and mobile homes regardless of the surface type underneath the homes. The pervious and impervious surface areas stated in the environmental checklist are correct. The appellant misstates the pervious areas by including the area under the mobile homes as pervious. This is incorrect. The runoff generated by the site is increased due to the impervious characteristics of the mobile home roofs. B.3.a.1 Surface water leaching out from a steep slope or migrating to a natural point of daylight does not constitute a body of water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. Consistent with the aquifer protection zone requirements of the City of Renton, aquifer protection zone 2 requires that the bioswales be lined with a pond liner material to GREG A. DIENER P.E. JOHN R. NEWELL P.E. RICHARD A. TOMKINS P.E. 130 ANDOVER PARK EAST, SUITE 300, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 99199 FAX/431-7975 20S/431-7970 Tamaron Pointe Apartments Appeal Response Oct 23, 1998 Page 2 B.3.a.1 Continued prevent the migration of pollutants into the aquifer. The protection zones are not intended to deal with aquifer recharge. Curtain drains or similar type rock filled perimeter trenches are planned to intercept any known or anticipated ground water from the base of the steep slope and will be routed to the storm drainage system. B.4.Plants Per discussion with city staff, a routine vegetation management permit is not required when a building permit and site development permit is made as in this case. The preceding information should provide some clarity for the civil engineering related concerns as stated in the appeal letter from the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Owners Association. If you have any questions please call. Thank You, PA IFIC E GINEERING DESIGN, INC. reg A. Diener P.E. CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 21, 1998 TO: Jennifer Henning FROM: Carolyn Boatsman SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apts; Ribera Project I have started receiving Neil Watts' monthly project status report. I am using it to try to provide early input re: possible aquifer protection structural needs for proposed buildings. It is likely that the Tamaron Pointe project will include an area or areas where chemicals are stored for the purpose of cleaning, maintenance, or, perhaps, operating a pool. If so,the project should incorporate an area that provides containment for chemicals. The volume required is equal to the size of the container for one container, or, for multiple containers, 150%of the size of the largest container or 10%of the volume of all containers added together,which ever is larger. Containment areas should be made of a material that will not be corroded or dissolved by the chemicals that will be stored there. Sealed concrete or plastic are suitable for many situations. Often an entire room can serve as containment if the sides are bermed and the floor slopes towards the middle. It is important that such a room NOT incorporate a floor drain. A chemical storage room can't serve as containment if spilled materials can go down the drain. It is unlikely that, at this stage in the development,the developer will know exactly what chemicals will be present. They should just take a best guess and over size the containment area so that it will serve typical needs that come up over the life of the building. It is not critical that they hit it right on the mark as it is relatively easy to install portable containment. The same requirement may be necessary should the Ribera Project eventually include senior apartments. Please call me at x7211 should you wish to discuss. Thanks. cc. Neil Watts hmmp/jh0998vc.doc "CVELOp a Clay OFNT REN Ga OCTc 1998 RECEIVED Ms Jennifer Toth Henning October 20, 1998 Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA, 98055 CC: Mr. Jim Hansen, Councilman Mr. Jim Shepard, Councilman Mr. Gregg Zimmerman, Councilman Subject: Tameron Pointe Apartments Project#LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM,ECF,V-H Dear Ms. Toth Henning, Our review of the above referenced application, site plans, drawings and site visit indicate that extensive clearing and excavations will be required. This gives rise to more than a little concern regarding the stability of our hillside. Evidence of earth movement exists at present as indicated by north-south cracks in our driveway and to the west of our house, midway of our property. Also signs of erosion during heavy rain and snow melt run-offs exist. Surely,the disastrous slides in places like West Seattle and Magnolia Bluff etc. should encourage us to proceed with caution. With that in mind, what kind of guaranties will the contractor and the City of Renton provide to the uphill residents that 3, 5 or 10 years in the future the work at the foot hill will not have a detrimental effect, and we will not suffer a similar fate as West Seattle has so many times. Sincerely, Manfred and Anne Hansen 1221 N 26th St. Renton WA, 98056 TAME1020.DOC CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the 2.2. O( day of Octobev , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing "Cepa't ' Inc W' documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing otih -Tveonnhnctl Csi V\tiki a lh Ge vard 51nc11a-t i A ev. Cmih� } "Jr- P. o . R ( tci) (Signature of Sender) J444C - •a.lc tr STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ll I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that jee c c signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fifr the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: a Q, /�>6->gi 77(C.)Notary Public tri and for the State of Wi ‘hington Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF My appointment mmiCSION EXf If EC C/20/00 Project Name: 10-maw v, Po�h�e ItS. Project Number: I.UPc• 18 • I23SA-VI, V NOTARY.DOC David Sager v:im and Theo Brown Rich and Susan Hopkins 10ZD North 28th Place 003 North 28th Place 1,511 Park Place North Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Eric and Cindy Korn Charles Jensen Bill Barlwo 1211 North 28th Place 2621 Meadow Place North 2100 Lk Washington Blvd. #91 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Shirley and Odell Milliren Tina and Jerry Cullers Mr. and Mrs. James Scott 1020 North 28th Place 2506 Meadow Avenue North 1405 North 28th Renton,WA 98056-2173 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Manfred and Anne Hansen Dean and Cynthia Schumacher Nancy Stark 1221 North 26th Street 1116 North 28th Place Mark Mykel Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 1409 North 26th Street Renton,WA 98056 Dean H. Schellert Donald and Patricia Rosburg M.L. Gibson 1013 North 28th Place 1402 North 26th Street 1215 North 28th Place Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Barbara Smith Robert and Esther Miller Rich Wagner 1308 North 26th Street 1121 North 28th Place Baylis Brand Wagner Architects Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 10801 Main Street Bellevue,WA 98004 LaVerne and Mary Jo Graves Steve and Julie Wasson Marlene Mandt 905 North 28th Place 2515 Park Place North 1408 North 26th Street Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Patrick McDonald Barry Oman Glyn Gardner 160 Vashon Place NE Friends of Youth 2100 Lake Washington Blvd#84 Renton,WA 98059 2500 Lake Washington Blvd North Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Song Qiao Roger Haynes Bill and Madeline Arrigoni 1412 North 26th St 2100 Lake Washington Blvd.N#62 907 North 34th Street Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Sondra Kraft 2100 Lake Washington Blvd N#68 Renton, WA 98056 .....:.. . ...: CITY OF_RENTON iiiiiiii: :::> :. ...::::>igii:$iiii :;::: :: .:.:; :::.:..... EARING EXAMINE ::.;: : ::::::.:;::;.. P C HE. I OCTOBER 27 1998 » .:::;;:>::: AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Heanng Examiner PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-123,SA,SM,ECF,V PROJECT DESCRIPTION: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. Location: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. AGNDA.DOC City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: October 27, 1998 Project Name: Tameron Pointe Apartments Applicant/ John Wayland Address: Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 Owner/ Norma Cugini Gerard M. Shellan J. Steve Harar Address: 611 Renton South Barbara Shellan Nancy Harar Renton, WA 98055 11 Lummi Key 11326 Rainier Bellevue, WA 98006 Avenue South Alex Cugini Jr. Seattle, WA 98178 4101 Lake Washington Blvd. PO Box 359 Renton, WA 98057 File Number: LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, Project Manager: Jennifer Toth ECF Henning • Project Description: The applicant has applied to develop a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. The site contains 9.08 developable acres, with 1.6 acres of steep slope that would be left undisturbed. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 rental units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The dwelling units would consist of 126 two-story townhouse units and 56 flats. Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of grading (cut/fill) would occur on site as a result of project construction. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. A variance is also requested from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance in order to clear and grade steep slope areas adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard. A modification has also been applied for from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. Project Location: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 2 of 12 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Norma Cugini, Alex Cugini Jr., J. Steve & Nancy Harar, Gerard & Nancy Shellan 2. Zoning Designation: Residential Multi-Family- Infill (RMI) 3. Comprehensive Plan Residential Multi-Family- Infill (RMI) Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Mobile Home Park for 92 mobile homes 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Zoned for single family residential and low density single family residential. Site abutting on the north is developed with the Griffin Home, other areas to the north are either vacant, or developed with single family residential homes. East: Single family residential and vacant. South: Multi-family residential development abuts the site on the south. Other areas to the south are vacant but zoned for multi-family residential - infill (RM-I). West: Lake Washington Boulevard, Lake Washington, and Gene Coulon Park. 6. Access: direct access from Lake Washington Boulevard via 2 existing driveways. 7. Site Area: 10.96 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 92 existing mobile homes, to be removed. New Building Area: approx. 305,000 s.f. Total Building Area: 305,000 s.f. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 1791 9-8-59 Annexation 1800 10-13-59 Annexation 1804 12-8-59 Comprehensive Plan 4498 6-7-93 Zoning Code 4404 3-26-95 Rezone 4456 6-20-94 HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 3 of 12 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Section 4-31-8: Residential Multi-Family Zone 2. Section 4-9: Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance 3. Section 4-14: Parking and Loading Ordinance E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Housing Element F. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has applied to develop a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. The site contains 9.08 developable acres, with 1.6 acres of steep slope that would be left undisturbed. Seventeen (17) three-story or three-story plus basement buildings with 182 rental units is proposed. In addition, a one-story recreation center with swimming pool, a tot lot, three detached garages, and parking for 372 vehicles would be provided. The dwelling units would consist of 126 two-story townhouse units in 15 buildings, and 56 flats in two buildings. Parking is proposed on the first level of the townhouse style apartment structures. Parking for 160 vehicles would be provided for in either one-car or two-car garages under the units. In ten of the buildings (Type C and E), 80 parking stalls would be provided (1 per unit) in one-car garages. In five of the buildings, (Type B, D, and F) 80 parking stalls would be provided for the 40 units, through tandem parking. The proposal would consist of residential structures ranging in height from 34 feet to nearly 41 feet. Floor area for the buildings would range from 10,406 s.f. (Building 4, floor area plus garage) to 38,787 s.f. (Buildings 8 and 14). The following table summarizes the residential development proposed for the subject site: Building Units Type Floor Area Garage Stories Height 1 10 - TH E 14,646 sf 2,462 sf 3 34' 2 8 - TH D 10,082 sf 3,660 sf 3 34' 3 8 - TH C 11,770 sf 1,992 sf 3 34' 4 6 - TH B 7,616 sf 2,790 sf 3 34' 5 10 - TH E 14,646 sf 2,462 sf 3 34' 6 8 - TH D 10,082 sf 3,660 sf 3 34' 7 8 - TH C 11,770 sf 1,992 sf 3 34' 8 28 - Flats A 38,787 sf 0 3+Basement 40'-10" 9 8 - TH C 11,770 sf 1,992 sf 3 34' 10 8 - TH D 10,082 sf 3,660 sf 3 34' 11 8 - TH C 11,770 sf 1,992 sf 3 34' 12 10 - TH E 14,646 sf 2,462 sf 3 34' 13 8 - TH C 11,770 sf 1,992 sf 3 34' 14 8 - Flats A 38,787 sf 0 3+Basement 40'-10" HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 4 of 12 15 8 -TH C 11,770 sf 1,992 sf 3 34' 16 10 - TH F 12,568 sf 4,542 sf 3 34' 17 8 - TH C 11,770 sf 1,992 sf 3 34' In addition a 2,550 s.f. recreation center would be constructed in the central portion of the site. This facility would feature an outdoor swimming pool secured with gated access. Access to the site would be from two existing driveways on the Lake Washington Boulevard frontage. Two-way access (ingress and egress) would be provided through the main access on the southwest portion of the site. Access would be controlled via keycard. A second drive on the northwest portion of the site would permit general egress, and secondary emergency access. Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of grading (cut/fill) would occur on site as a result of project construction. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. A one-year notice was issued to the residents of the mobile home park on August 15, 1998. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. A variance is also requested from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance in order to clear and grade steep slope areas adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard. A modification has also been applied for from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on September 30, 1998, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). The appeal period for the DNS-M ended on October 19, 1998. One appeal of the environmental threshold determination was filed on October 19, 1998. The appeal on the environmental determination has been scheduled by the Hearing Examiner and will be combined with the public hearing for the site plan on the Tameron Pointe Apartments proposal. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with four mitigation measures that the applicant is required to comply with. The appeal period for the environmental determination ended on October 19, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. Several comment letters were received and are contained in the project file. An appeal of the environmental threshold determination was filed on October 19, 1998. The appeal hearing will be combined with the public hearing that has been scheduled to consider the site plan for the proposal. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 5 of 12 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However, strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation. The site plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to, the following:" (5A) GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The subject site is designated Residential - Multi-Family - Infill (RM-I) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan that apply to the proposal include: Policy LU-11. Future residential growth should be accommodated through: (d.) new larger scale multi-family development located in Renton's downtown, as infill in existing multi-family areas, in designated Centers. (Note: emphasis added) The proposal would be located on a site that is zoned for multi-family infill development and adjacent to an existing multi-family residential development. Policy LU-15. Encourage a city-wide mix of housing types including large lot and small lot single family development, small-scale and large-scale multi-family housing, and residential mixed- use development. (Note: emphasis added) The proposal would provide for large-scale multi-family housing as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. Policy LU-17. Large multi-family development projects or large concentrations of multi-family development should be prohibited outside the downtown area except in Centers and the Multi- family Residential Infill designations. (Note: emphasis added) The proposal is located in an area designated for Multi-Family Infill Residential development. Objective LU-L: Encourage the development of infill parcels in existing multi-family districts with compatible projects. The property is appropriately designated and zoned, and abuts an existing multi-family residential development. Policy LU-64. Development density should generally be in the range of 10-20 dwelling units per acre. Proposed net development density would be 19.91 dwelling units per acre, which is near the maximum allowed net density, but which complies with the permitted range of 10.0 to 20.0 dwelling units per acre. Policy LU-65. New development in Residential Multi-family Infill designations should be compatible in size, scale, bulk, use, and design with other existing multi-family developments. The existing apartment complex located to the south of the subject parcel has been developed at a similar size, scale, and bulk. As with the existing development, Tameron Pointe is oriented to capture views of Lake Washington and Gene Coulon Park from west facing units. Policy LU-66. Design standards should be applied that reflect present development patterns and are sensitive to unique features and differences among established neighborhoods. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 6 of 12 Standards should address, but not be limited to: 1) building height, width, and length; 2) front, side, and rear yard setbacks; 3) maximum lot coverage; 4) location of driveways, garages, and parking areas; 5) number of garages and off-site parking spaces; 6) roofline; and 7) compatibility with adjacent uses. The referenced design standards reflect the development standards applied through the RM-I Zone. Policy LU-67. Siting and design of new structures should be sensitive to site constraints and adjacent uses. Provision of adequate buffers or setbacks or scaling down building heights may be required to transition from Residential Multi-family Infill designations to adjacent lower density uses. The proposal locates proposed residential and recreation facilities on flat portions of the site, away from steep slope areas. Existing wooded slopes to the east, would be avoided and would buffer the adjacent less intensive single family residential zoned properties to the north and east. Proposed structures would meet or exceed setbacks applied through the development standards of the RM-I Zone. Policy LU-68. Adequate green spaces, recreation, design amenities, signing and lighting should be determined as part of the site planning process. Allowable densities should be based on meeting these objectives. The proposal features two recreation areas that would be available for the use of residents. The townhouse building types would have features that mimic the style of single family residential development. This includes pitched roofs, dormers, fenestration, and modulation typically found in the vernacular architectural style of the Puget Sound region. Policy LU-69. Residential Multi-family Infill designations should not be expanded. Land within the districts should be used efficiently to meet multi-family housing needs. The proposal would provide multi-family housing on an appropriately designated parcel, at the densities intended by City policy and code. Policy H-36. Encourage developers to provide amenity features such as private recreation facilities, e.g. pools, tennis courts and private parks to serve luxury developments. The proposal would include a recreation facility with swimming pool, tot lot, and an extension of the Lake Washington Boulevard bicycle lane. (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The following requirements and development standards contained in Section 4-31-8:D Residential Multi-Family Zone of the Zoning Code, specifically the Residential Multi-Family - Infill (RM-I) Zone, are applicable to this proposal. Density. The RM-I Zone establishes a minimum net density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre, and a maximum net density of 20 dwelling units per acre. For purposes of calculating the net density of a site, public streets and sensitive environmental areas are subtracted from the overall site area. For the 10.69 acre site, 1.55 acres of the site are considered to be sensitive with slopes that exceed 40% and therefore cannot be developed. No public roads would be constructed on the site. Therefore, the net developable area of the site is 9.14 acres, permitting a minimum of 91.4 dwelling units and a maximum of 182.8 dwelling units. With the proposed 182 units, the net density is calculated to be 19.91 dwelling units per acre. The proposal is within the density range permitted in the RM-I Zone. Setbacks. Setbacks permitted in the RM-I Zone are 20 feet for the front yard and 15 feet for the rear yard. Side yard setbacks are based on a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the lot width or 5 feet, whichever is greater. For lots that are 120 feet or greater in width, the required sideyard setback is 12 feet. And for each story in excess of two stories, an additional one foot side yard setback is required for each story, up to a maximum cumulative setback of 20 feet. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 7 of 12 Special setbacks of 25 feet are required for side and rear yard lines along the abutting side of the property if the subject site abuts a lot zoned RC, R-1, R-5, R-8, or R-10. The proposal abuts R-1 property on the north, and R-8/RM-I on the east. Therefore, minimum 25-foot side and rear yard setbacks are required for those areas that abut the R-1 and R-8 Zones. The proposal would maintain a 20 foot front yard setback from Lake Washington Boulevard North on the west; a minimum 25-foot sideyard setback from the north and south property lines; and a minimum 31'-6" rear yard setback from the R-8 Zone on the east, and a minimum rear yard setback of 15'-3" for that portion of the site abutting the RM-I Zone on the east property boundary. The proposal complies with both the standard and special setbacks established for the RM-I Zone. Height. The RM-I Zone permits building heights of 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet. However, the applicant is permitted to request through the site plan review process, additional stories and up to ten (10) additional feet in height through the provision of adequate amenities such a pitched roofs, additional recreation facilities, underground parking, and/or additional landscaped open spaces areas. Also in the RM-I designation, additional height for a residential dwelling structures may be obtained through the site plan review process depending on the compatibility of the proposed buildings with adjacent existing residential development. In no case shall the height of a residential structure exceed 45 feet. (Note: Height is measured from the finished grade to the mid-point of a pitched roof.) The proposal features 17 residential structures and one recreational structure. Buildings are described by types A through F. The following table describes the proposed building type, number of stories and height from average grade to the mid-point of the roof. Type Number Building Stories Height A 2 Bldgs 8, 14 3 stories + basement 40-10" B 1 Bldg 4 3 stories 34' C 7 Bldgs 3, 7, 9, 11, 15, 17 3 stories 34' D 3 Bldgs 2, 6, 10 3 stories 34' E 3 Bldgs 1, 5, 12 3 stories 34' F 1 Bldg 16 3 stories 34' Rec. 1 Bldg N/A 1 story 16'-3" Building Type A would have stacked flat apartments, while building Types B through F would be townhouse style apartment units with parking underneath. Each of the proposed residential structures would exceed 2-1/2 stories, but only Buildings 8 and 14 (Type A structures) would be taller than the 35 feet permitted outright in the RM-I Zone. The applicant is permitted to propose additional height and stories provided that amenities such as pitched roofs, additional recreation facilities, underground parking and/or additional landscaped open space is proposed. The applicant meets this criteria by proposing pitched roofs on all of the structures, a recreation building with swimming pool, a tot lot, underground parking, and common landscaped open space on the site. Lot Coverage. In the RM-I Zone buildings may cover up to 35% of the site. However, through the Hearing Examiner process, lot coverage may be increased to 45%. Impervious surface of the combined building footprint, sidewalks, driveways, etc. may not exceed 75%. The proposal has a site area of 465,656 s.f. with 99,16 s.f. or 21.2% covered by buildings. Building footprints, patios and sidewalks, driveways and parking would total 226,833 s.f. or 48.7% of the total site. Tameron Pointe would comply with lot coverage criteria specified in the RM-I Zone. Parking. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires multi-family developments to provide 1.5 parking off-street parking spaces for each unit, and one additional guest stall for each four units. For the 182 unit development, 318 parking stalls are required (182 units x 1.75 stalls per unit = 318.5 parking stalls). The applicant is proposing 372 parking stalls, or 53.5 more than required. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heating Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 8 of 12 Parking would be provided in garages (144 stalls) and open lots (228 stalls). Surface parking would include 10 accessible stalls, 47 compact stalls, and 171 standard stalls. Code allows up to 30% of all stalls to be compact, and the applicant is proposing that 12.7% be compact. Since the applicant is proposing to exceed City parking requirements, a modification has been requested Code. Staff has recommended approval of the requested parking modification which has been forwarded to the Department Administrator for a decision. Circulation aisles for 90-degree head-in parking areas are required to be a minimum width of 24 feet. The applicant has complied with this Code requirement. The private circulation system on the site is considered to be a series of driveways, which requires a minimum width of 20 feet in order to accommodate emergency vehicles. The applicant has complied with this provision for the interior of the site, but would need to revise the primary ingress/egress drives for the site such that the 20-foot width is maintained for the traffic aisle and gate opening. Staff will recommend as a condition of site plan approval, that the applicant revise the proposal to provide the necessary clearance to accommodate emergency vehicles. Land Clearing. Code Section 4-9 regulates land clearing and tree cutting activities in the City of Renton. The Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance states that no tree cutting or land clearing is permitted where the predominant or individual slope exceeds 40% except enhancement activities. The applicant would be clearing and grading areas on the western portion of the property along Lake Washington Boulevard in order to remove and replace previously deposited fill material and to construct Code required street improvements along Lake Washington Boulevard. The removal of vegetation on the steep slopes adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard requires a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance. The applicant has applied for the necessary variance, and that request is analyzed later in this staff report to the Hearing Examiner. (58) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES: In evaluating impact to surrounding properties and uses, several issues are to be considered including: site layout that could impair enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures in the community; whether the proposal introduces development which is overscale in terms of size, bulk, height, and the like; whether there is a desirable transition and linkage between uses and to the street; how structures are places on the site in relation to the natural characteristics of the site; whether unnecessary and avoidable impacts of new construction on views is mitigated; whether screening of mechanical equipment and refuse/garbage containers is accomplished; and how lighting is addressed to avoid excessive brightness or glare. The proposal would result in the construction of 17 residential structures with 182 units, a 2,550 s.f. recreation building, tot lot, 3 detached garages, surface parking, circulation aisles and site infrastructure. In addition, new landscaping would be installed extensively on the site. Proposed development would replace existing use of the site as a mobile home park. Presently, 92 mobile homes are located on the property. The proposed structures are arranged to take advantage of views to Lake Washington and Coulon Park and in keeping with the existing topography of the site. Development is generally arranged in 3 tiers, with townhouse buildings along the west site boundary, townhouse structures, the recreation center and apartment flats located in the center of the site, and townhouse apartments at the back of the site. Steep slope areas on the east are avoided, and existing vegetation on those slopes would not be disturbed. Site planning and architectural design have been accomplished to diminish impacts both to the site and surrounding areas. The site is surrounded by a comparable scale of development to the south and by lower density zoning and existing development to the north and east. Building setbacks and the organization of the circulation and parking on the site are intended to buffer the proposal from off-site uses. Landscaping is proposed to define the edges of the developed areas and provide additional transition and buffer. Pitched roofs, dormers, fenestration, decks and HEXRPT.DDC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 9 of 12 entrances, are inherent in the proposed design and are similar to the detached single family residential dwellings. The two larger structures would also feature pitched roofs and modulation on the buildings to diminish size and bulk. The two largest structures, in terms of height, bulk and area, are the Type A structures which represent Buildings 8 and 14. These structures would be approximately 190 feet long by 80 feet wide, at the widest point. Each Type A structure would have a footprint of 11,082 s.f. Twenty- eight (28) apartment flats are planned for each of these structures. The height at the mid-point of the pitched roof would be 40'-10", representing three stories plus a basement. Building 8 is proposed for the center of the site next to the recreation center, while Building 14 would be located on the north-central portion of the site. Views from existing development to the east would not be impacted by Building 8 or 14 as demonstrated in site Sections A-A and B-B (Sheet No. A-3), the recently submitted Section C-C (which correlates to Section A-A and extends the section line to the east. Site slopes on the adjacent property are wooded and existing development is located upslope and above the roof level of the proposed buildings. Generally, the townhouse structures would have building footprints of approximately 3,500 s.f. to 5,500 s.f. and each building would contain from 6 to 10 units. The height of the proposed buildings is consistent at 34 feet from finished grade to the mid-point of the pitched roof. And rough proportions of the structures are 100 to 160 feet long by approximately 40 feet in width. An internal walkway system is proposed from the main entrance to Lake Washington Boulevard, and from the recreation center to an overlook and to the residential structures. On the project site plan (Sheet Al) the walkway system is noted as a pedestrian link to Gene Coulon Park. The pedestrian system is concentrated on connecting to the main entrance. Staff will recommend as a condition of site plan approval that the applicant also provide a pedestrian connection from the north portion of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. Five trash enclosure locations are identified on the site plan. Trash enclosures are located both on the periphery of the site and in the central area to provide access to all of the residential buildings and the recreation structure. The applicant's landscape plans show that vegetative screening would be installed around each of these enclosures. Landscaping is proposed which consists of trees, shrubs, groundcovers, sod, annuals and perennials. The landscape plan provides for buffering between structures and at the edge of developed areas. The entrance to the site would include a landscaped island to define the entrance and to separate ingress and egress traffic. No lighting plans have been submitted as part of the proposal. The applicant has indicated in the environmental checklist that parking areas would be lighted for security and that lights would be hooded where possible to direct light on-site in order to minimize off-site glare. Staff will recommend that the applicant provide a lighting plan to the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of permits for the proposal. (5C) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE: The proposal proposes to accomplish intensive site redevelopment with out disturbing sensitive steep slopes to the east. Clearing limits are established that do not intrude into the wooded steep slope areas. Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to record a Native Growth Protection Easement to run with the title for the property, in order to protect the steep slope area from clearing activities. Buildings are sited in relation to site topography to reduce overall site grading. Recreation areas would be centrally located and accessed via an internal pedestrian system. Parking for residents and guest would be available in surface lots, garages and parking aprons in front of units. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Heanng Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 10 of 12 The proposal would increase the value of the site and would implement the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan in that the site would be developed with the use and density envisioned by the plan. (5D) CIRCULATION AND ACCESS: Access to the site would be via two existing driveways which intersect with Lake Washington Boulevard. The primary access would be at the southwest portion of the site via a gated driveway. Plans indicated that the entrance drive would be approximately 60 feet in width, with two 20-foot travel lanes (one for ingress and the other for egress). A sidewalk would be located on the north side of the entrance, along the egress lane. A center landscaped island is proposed with keycard access to the site. The egress lane narrows to approximately 15 feet in width at the gate location. In order to meet fire department requirements, the applicant would need to revise the egress to provide a minimum of 20 feet clear for emergency vehicles. The access drive from Lake Washington Boulevard North at the north end of the site would be used by residents to exit the site. The driveway would also function as a two-way emergency access drive. The north driveway is shown as 25 feet wide and would intersect with Lake Washington Boulevard at an acute angle of 30 degrees or less. This driveway angle is existing but is awkward and could affect sight distance for vehicles leaving the site and making a left turn to travel north on Lake Washington Boulevard North. In addition, the driveway angle conflicts with City Code Section 4-14-4:b.5 which states that: "The angle between any driveway and the street roadway or curb line shall not be less than 45 degrees." Staff will recommend as a condition of Site Plan Review that the driveway angle for the northernmost drive be modified to either a 90-degree intersection with Lake Washington Boulevard or an angle between 45 and 90 degrees that is acceptable to the City's Development Services Division and Transportation Systems Division. Pedestrian circulation is provided on the site and to the primary access drive. Staff will recommend as a condition of site plan approval, that the applicant be required to provide an additional pedestrian connection to Lake Washington Boulevard to improve access from the north portion of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. (5E) SIGNAGE: The applicant did not submit sign plans as part of the application packet. Separate sign permits will be required, and the applicant would need to comply with the City's Sign Code. (5F) AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA (APA): Prior to the issuance of any permit in an Aquifer Protection Area, a finding must be made that the proposal will not impact the quantity or quality of water in the aquifer on a short-term basis, long- term basis, or cumulatively in conjunction with other existing or proposed uses. The proposal is located within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. Since a swimming pool is proposed as part of the recreation facilities, it is assumed that chemicals would be stored for the purposes of cleaning, maintaining or operating the pool. In order to comply with the provisions of the City's Aquifer Protection Area Ordinance, an area would need to be established that provides for the containment of chemicals. The volume required is equal to the size of the container for one container, or, for multiple containers, it is 150% of the size of the largest container or 10% of the volume of all containers added together, whichever is larger. Containment areas should be made of a material that will not be corroded or dissolved by the chemicals that will be stored there. Sealed concrete or plastic are suitable for many situations. Often an entire room conserve as containment if the sides are bermed and the floor slopes HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 11 of 12 towards the middle. However, it is important that such a room not incorporate a floor drain. Portable containment is possible for pool facilities and could be considered in this case. The applicant will need to coordinate their efforts with the City's Water Utility, in order to comply with the Aquifer Protection Area requirements. (5G) HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT AND STORAGE FACILITIES: Not applicable. G. VARIANCE: The applicant is requesting a variance from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance, specifically, Section 4-9-5:D. which states that: "No tree cutting or land clearing is permitted within twenty-five feet(25) of any shoreline area, within twenty five feet(25) or the ordinary high water mark of creeks, in a wetland area, or on parcels where the predominant slope or individual slope is in excess of forty percent(40%) except enhancement activities." The applicant is proposing to remove unconsolidated soil and previously deposited fill in order to construct Code-required street improvements and to support proposed site development in areas where the fill would be removed. The Hearing Examiner shall have the authority to grant variances from the provisions of Title IV of the City Code upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant maintains that exceptional circumstances have been placed on the property due to the fact that the site contains steep slopes that were created by the previous development of the site as a mobile home park. Slopes to the east part of the site were cut and this material was placed on the west side of the site as fill. According to the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Geotech Consultants (dated June 18, 1998), this fill material contains organic material and has shown signs of movement and settlement, and is unsuitable for new construction, including the City Code-required street improvements. The slope area between the north and south driveways currently shows signs of soil sliding down the slope onto Lake Washington Boulevard. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant states that excavation and replacement of the unsuitable, existing fill will correct the slide and erosion problems that currently exist on the site. City codes require that any new development on the site will need to install street improvements (i.e., curb, gutter and sidewalk). The installation of street improvements would be beneficial to the area, as would the removal of unconsolidated fill material, which is prone to sliding. 3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner TAMERON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:October 27, 1998 Page 12 of 12 The applicant argues that the variance is intended to mitigate serious problems related to existing conditions that have been created through the previous development of the site. The variance will allow the applicant to develop the site as envisioned in both the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, while also installing Code-required improvements. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The applicant states that the variance affects only the areas that are man-made steep slopes created by previous development, which need to be mitigated. All natural steep slope areas would remain undisturbed. The excavation of the unsuitable fill is considered to be the minimum action necessary to develop the site because any development would require the installation of street improvements and to correct the slides that occur in this location onto Lake Washington Boulevard. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Tameron Pointe Apartments, Site Plan and Variance, Project File No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, V, SM, ECF subject to the following conditions: (1) ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. (2) Re-align Northern Driveway. The applicant shall modify the site plan to realign the driveway angle for the northernmost drive to either a 90-degree intersection with Lake Washington Boulevard, or an angle between 45 and 90 degrees that is acceptable to the City's Development Services Division and Transportation Systems Division. Approval of the revised driveway is required prior to the issuance of construction or building permits for the proposal. (3) Main Entry Drive Aisle Widths: The applicant shall the site plant for the primary ingress/egress drive to provide a minimum 20-foot width in both the traffic aisle and the gate opening area. Revisions to the site plan must be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction or building permits for the proposal. (4) Native Growth Protection Easement. The applicant shall record a Native Growth Protection Easement for the steep slope areas 40% and greater on the east portion of the site in order to protect the slopes from future disturbance. The Native Growth Protection Easement shall be recorded against the title for the property prior to the issuance of building permits. (5) Pedestrian Access. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian connection from the north end of the site to Lake Washington Boulevard. The pedestrian connection shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of any construction or building permits for the proposal. (6) Site Lighting Plan. The applicant shall submit a site lighting plan for the review and approval of the Development Services Division project manager prior to the issuance of construction or building permits. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2) years from the final approval (signature) date. HEXRPT.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: October 05, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: September 29, 1998 SIGNATURES: 4 //24/q/ gg Zam erm A ministrator DATE Departrrie t of‘ anning/Building/Public Works 7 ,-7' .Jim Shepherd, s4dministrator DAT // ommunity Services (' .) ( ' V V - - -.e €(_- P- ozr-717- Le,yW e,er, it C itt DATE R nto Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by current site development. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$388 per each new multi-family residential unit, and $0.52 per square feet of non-residential development. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee, equivalent to $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall follow recommendations of Geotech Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study for Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments (dated June 18, 1998). DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Building Department 1. Recommendations of the applicant's soils report must be followed. 2. The current Uniform Building Code followed used by the City of Renton is the 1997 version. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow for the "A" buildings is 4,500 gallons per minute (gpm). For the "E" buildings, the minimum fire flow is 3,000 gpm, and for the "F" buildings 3,250 gpm. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feel of each of the buildings and one additional hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow is required within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarms and sprinkler system installation in each building. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$70,616.00 is estimated to apply based on $388.00 per each multi-family residential unit, and an additional $1,326.00 for the proposed recreation center, based on $0.52 per square foot of the building square footage. 4. The divided main access is required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide on each side of the divider. Each gate would need to be 20-feet wide with fire department emergency access. Plan Review-General 1. Drawings submitted for the construction permit are required to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 2. The project site is located within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. Plan Review-Water 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is$510 per unit and is to be paid at the time the construction permit is issued. The estimated cost for 182 units is $92,820.00. Tamaron Pointe Apartments LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF,V-H Advisory Notes (Continued) 2. The project is located in the 435 water zone. Static pressure will require a pressure reducing valve. 3. The loop water system is required to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Legal description document to be provided for review with 15-foot easement. 4. Water mains would need to be separated by a minimum of 10-feet from storm and sewer lines. 5 . A backflow prevention device is required on the domestic water service when the building heights are over 30-feet. 6. Storz fittings are required on the Fire hydrants. 7. Water valve location and size are to be noted on plans. Plan Review-Sanitary Sewer 1. The .Sewer System Development Connection charge is$350 per unit. The estimated fee for 182 units is $63,700. 2. A vertical profile of the sewer system will be required for the construction permit. Sewer lines are to have a 2% slope to property line. Sewer lines on site to be labeled "Private". 3. Maintain proper horizontal separation of 10-feet from water and a minimum of 7.5-feet from storm. The minimum vertical separation is 18 inches or greater. Plan Review-Storm Drainage 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square feet of new impervious surface area. Existing impervious surface area and new impervious surface area to be provided on construction plans. From the site plan and project overview there is a discrepancy with the King County record concerning the site area. King County indicates a site area of 515,253 square feet. There are several important considerations to address. This site is developed currently as a mobile home park. The redevelopment credit is appropriate to apply. There are undevelopable steep slope areas shown on the plan as 69,696 square feet. These areas should be confirmed as greenbelt areas and as such are exempt from the SDC fee. There must be a calculation of new impervious area in order to determine the amount of the surface water SDC fee. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with elevations. Provide datum and benchmark. 3. A Level#1 Storm Drainage analysis is required per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Address all Core Requirements and Special Requirements. Special Requirements 5 and 6 to be specifically addressed. 4. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator Catch Basin or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5,000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 6. A vertical profile of the storm system is required. 7. The applicant must prove that a storm detention system is not required as stated in item number 10 below. 8. Calculations must be provided to show that the peak rate for the 100-year, 24-hour duration design storm event is calculated to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the predeveloped peak runoff rate for the proposed project site existing runoff conditions. • Plan Review—Transportation 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. City estimated trip generation is 735 daily new trips. Therefore the estimated fee is as follows: $75 x 735= $55,125.00 Mitigation fee. Tamaron Pointe Apartments LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF,V-H Advisory Notes (Continued) 2. Off site improvements are curb, gutters and sidewalks required on Lake Washington Blvd. N. the full length of the property frontage. A five(5) foot minimum planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. This also included sufficient roadway widening to provide for a bike lane. 3. An additional off site improvement, street lighting is required for Lake Washington Blvd. N. covering the full length of the property frontage. Street lighting to meet City of Renton Standards. Lighting level is 0.6 ft-c minimum and uniformity ratio of 4:1 minimum. 4. All overhead electrical and communication cables abutting to the property frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. under 55-kV to be installed underground in coordination with the electrical and communications utilities at the developers expense. Trenching and conduit location and size for the electrical and communication facilities to be shown on the construction plans. 6. Entrance and roadway grades not to exceed 8%. A variance must be requested for grades above 8%. 7. The gated entrance must have sufficient vehicle queuing to prevent backup onto the arterial. 8. Truck hauling to be scheduled during off peak traffic conditions which is between 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM. - Parks and Recreation 1. A Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per new apartment unit would apply to the proposal. The value of the recreation center can be credited against up to 33% of the Parks Mitigation Fee. In addition, credit for the existing 92 mobile homes may be given. 2. The proposed landscaping appears to stop at the property line, and there is a gap between the landscaping and the new sidewalk. Landscaping should extend up to the sidewalk, and also be maintained by the owner. The existing 4-foot wide at-grade bicycle trail (on both sides of Lake Washington Boulevard) is not noted on the drawings. The proposed curb, gutter and sidewalk required that the bicycle lane be widened from 4-feet to 5-feet (curbed roads require a 5-foot minimum width for at-grade trails). The Lake Washington Boulevard bicycle trail is part of a regional trail system and can not be included as part of the sidewalk. Development Services Division 1. The proposal requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit as a portion of the site is within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Line for Lake Washington. 2. The project site is zoned RM-I (Residential Multi-Family Infill). Densities are permitted with the range of 10 du/ac minimum and 20 du/ac maximum. Building heights in the RM-I Zone are limited to 35 feet or 0., 2-1/2 stories. Additional stories and up to an additional 10 feet in height may be requested through the Site Plan Review process. 3. The proposal requires a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner in order-to consider the Site Plan. 4. As part of the Variance request, staff will recommend that erosion control and sedimentation control measures be in place along Lake Washington Boulevard, and that the applicant submit weekly reports from the geotechnical engineer documenting the progress of the excavation, fill, and required street • aj improvements (construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, bike lane, etc.). DPP/ii�+� G J ciP,.' TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Environmental Review Development Services Division August 31, 1998 TRANSPORTATION: 1. Construction plans to meet City of Renton Drafting Standards. A construction permit is required. 2. The traffic mitigation fee is$75 per new trip generated. 3. City estimated trip generation is 735 daily new trips. Therefore the estimated fee is as follows: $75 x 735 =S55,125.00 Mitigation fee. See attached calculation sheet. Trip rate above is determined by dwelling units, not acreage or square footage as used in the transportation report prepared by TPE. 4. Off site improvements are curb, gutters and sidewalks required on Lake Washington blvd. N. the full length of the property frontage. A five(5) foot minimum planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. This also included sufficient roadway widening to provide for a bike lane. 5. An additional off site improvement, street lighting is required for Lake Washington Blvd. covering the full length of the property frontage. Street lighting to meet City of Renton Standards. Lighting level is 0.6 ft-c minimum and uniformity ratio of 4:1 minimum. 6. All overhead electrical and communication cables abutting to the property frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. under 55-K.V. to be underground in coordination with the electrical and commutations utilities at the Developers expense. Trenching and conduit location and size for the electrical and communication facilities to be shown on the plans. 7. Entrance and roadway grades not to exceed 8%. A variance must be requested for grades above 8%. 8. A gate entrance to have sufficient vehicle storage to prevent backup onto the arterial. 9. Truck hauling to be scheduled during off peak traffic conditions which is between 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM. 98cm117t 98CM117T.DOC\ �w.er,,. � Xrl+•C.� { 1'-'. TRANSP�QRTATE TIWIt13 " k ,nr FEE S /'Y•tiS.'M>: w.i .v.Kw'Y: .WMwsfRY...�Y11'..YwnAwCw:w'M• NN f -/ L-t L ��y� Project Name ! �wlctvu�i Poiitire Ape(lit S �'j Project Address 2100 Lake Waslor,citc,i PJv,;f / Contact Person Sat ,l Walho;[{ I1.awiFor_ lI Ci ,.}c-V Address Phone Number U 2 5 - gas -- 3003. • Permit Number L UA - ci S - 123 Project Description N1ult. le Iv (tj cirveloemc,,1 &tt JO, b l acvz : r7c . Pre cr_ed -bit.l azi I-7 l(hR2 5���v l:IG! y uA o' IS Z IAA' c); eti pc�,✓I�,ctc/ ?0 72 veli�c �c� . tlC !(.c'v) qZ 41ol,, 1r Itotile.s i ITc 5-`L' Ecr,7i Land Use Type: Method o Calculation: ) C4'Residential SITE Trip Generation Manual 'Vtv1,11r !/C 11 Pu, (z • 0 Retail O Traffic Study /'i 1427 - U.S1 -1,:,Fs �, uoi t ❑ Non-retail O Other Art(2zu),(,,;tl - 6:47 ✓,vs ru u;„ 7 • Calculation: I C )( � _ 1 ) = 3 5 n(ctl cJ S NtT F � �u�l� �vlf ►82 �.u7 ( 1Z C f. 8i I i �w At 75 r. tti ��. • ( $-15) ( 735) =( 55 : 0 • c..) � 55 Transportation Mitigation Fee: 551125,• • Calculated by: !'�ea We- 6 Date: Account Number: lOS. 5RR• 3)8o, 70. 00. Date of Payment • TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Environment Review Development Services Division August 31, 1998 SEWER: 1. The .Sewer System Development Connection charge is $350 per unit. The estimated fee for 190 units is $ . 41 Go, 2. A vertical profile of the sewer system will be required. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. Sewer lines on site to be labeled"Private". 3. All drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. Standards are available at the 6th floor counter> 4. Maintain proper horizontal separation of 10-feet from water and a minimum of 7.5-feet from storm. The minimum vertical separation is 18 inches or greater. 5. The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone#2. 98cm117S 98CM117S.DOC\ TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Environment Review Development Services Division August 31, 1998 STORM DRAINAGE (Surface Water): 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square feet of new impervious surface area. Existing impervious surface area and new impervious surface area to be provided on construction plans. From the site plan and project overview there is a discrepancy with the King County record concerning the site area. King County indicates a site area of 515,253 square feet. There are several important considerations to address. This site is developed currently as a mobile home park. The redevelopment credit is appropriate to apply. There are undevelopable steep slope areas shown on the plan as 69,696 square feet. These areas should be confirmed as greenbelt areas and as such are exempt from the SDC fee. There must be a calculation of new impervious area in order to determine the amount of the surface water SDC fee. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with elevations. Provide datum and benchmark. 3. The utility drawings to comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 4. A Level #1 Storm Drainage analysis is required per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Address all Core Requirements and Special Requirements. Special Requirements 5 and 6 to be specifically addressed. 5. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator CB or adequate biofiltration system. 6. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5,000 square feet are • required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 7. The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone#2. 8. Vertical profile of the storm system is required. 9. The applicant must prove that a storm detention system is not required as stated in item number 10 below. 10. Calculations must be provided to show peak rate for the 100-year, 24-hour duration design storm event is calculated to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the predeveloped peak runoff rate for the proposed project site existing runoff conditions. 98cm117D 98CM117D.DOC\ City or Renton Department of Planning/Building/Pub,,.:Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Covsl1Auc _._►-VIC-e4 COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH FIENNIN� PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 '4(/r, 1� LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North // /5,,, SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile hor ~� BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 2689.4 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the developmerabf a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ---o ( t o w IAA 44-4 iAa �� S U f, S ,-- OI (S i ipor � r � vr✓ r `-.7 7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date / nFVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 U�fY O • CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 4;t, MEMORANDUM DATE: August 25, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apts., 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow for A buildings is 4500 Gpm, E buildings, 3000 GPM and F buildings, 3250 GPM. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of each of the buildings and one additional hydrant for each 1000 GPM of required fire flow are required within 300 feet of the each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarms and sprinkler system installation in each building. 3. A fire mitigation fee of $70,616.00 is required based on $388.00 per Unit and $1,326.00 for the Rec Center based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. 4. The divided main access is required to be minimum of 20 feet on both side of the divider. Each gate would need to be 20 feet wide with fire department emergency access. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Environmental Review Development Services Division August 31, 1998 WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is $510 per unit. To be paid at the time construction permit is issued. The estimated cost for 190 units is $(1( %ci 2. The construction plans to meet City of Renton drafting standas. 3. The project is located in the 435 water zone. Static pressure will require a pressure reducing valve. 4. The loop water system is required to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Legal description document to be provided for review with 15-foot easement. 5. One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpm of fire flow. Building "A"will required 5-fire hydrants, building `E"requires 3-fire hydrants, and building F will require 4-fire hydrants per fire flow required by Fire Prevention Department. 6. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants to be within 300 feet of the structures. • 7. The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone#2. 8. Water to be separated by 10-feet from storm and sewer. 9 A backflow prevention device is required on the domestic water service when the building heights are over 30-feet which is indicated as such on the proposed plans. 10. Storz fittings are required on the Fire hydrants. 11. Water valve location and size to be noted on plans. 98cm117W 98CM117W.DOC\ City u. Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: peurks COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile homes BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 298,054 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located`Within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts .Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstodc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet j�14,,000 Feet OLD 7S- i 44, B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • Q7-- G" ` �ft.dk i�a2%c"o to s«Geuxr/,C 62,7a r ci•k-° a.4-� D 76 ( yh e� 6 L` l L f0 - �rx�`� ‘re-rn�c�eYA�r-ails -moo t-4-74'ff G7 5 '-0" frwr), w' -12 !� em ca/2n674-7x ce' 2a7eTie'' _s ue1-11• (!/ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS/7LL7/7 �(. , 35q. i u �c e) `� c of /O A/ R v2.eczAia)d 041- /a_ I ! 2 Qd or? p C�rzr�� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. / 7 gnature of Director or A orized Representative Date (` DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or rtenton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: MA 1‘c.e COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Re:idential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile homes BUILDING AREAlnew expansion gross): 298,054 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has' pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted witl a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental :1- review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number` of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. Q��' / / (DCJ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS 6\06-Q1CUU Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable r-obable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics _ Water Light/Glare . .. Plants Recreation Land/Ssorellne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services \/' Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation — Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Estimate 84.64 police calls for service annually, based on the size of the property. During the construction phase, the site will need to be secured with temporary fencing, and security lighting will need to be in place during the hours of darkness . All building materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use. If a portable office trailer is used , it will need auxiliary, locks on the doors and windows (preferably bars over the windows) , and office equipment and machinery will need to be secured (preferably locked down to the walls or floor with cables) , to help , .: prevent burglary. The apartment complex itself has two main entrances , which could allow the site to be secured with B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS electronic gates . This would allow access control onto the site, and will greatly help to reduce common apartment complex crimes such as burglary, auto theft and theft from vehicles . Each unit will need dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, which will need to be solid core, as well as peepholes in each door. Each building should have address numbers at least 6" in height, of-:a color that contrasts with the color of the building, and placed under a light source. Landscaping should not be placed in areas that will obstruct the views of windows or doorways , and there-by provide hiding places for criminal activity. All stairways and balconies , including outside fencing, should be of the type of fencing that is see-through, i .e. , wooden or metal railings that allow visibility through the fence. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS A second tot-lot is recommended behind buildings #4 and #6, to provide children on this end of the property with a safe place to play, that can be easily overseen by residents in the adjacent units A secure mail-box for outgoing mail is recommended to help prevent theft of mail . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. )2c1?91) 9,a,, qr Siit�iafure of Direct or uthonzed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 REM40RS REVISED PER J 1 w• 0�, 1J roof `�, ��� \(�/��/✓% ce, s. f - t,.y s- ..,...„ ,-7/.--. ‘' relESIN*4Wei. 47/We' 1 I 2 - --- "b."..<,,,,,),(--4-4*.k.,ii,...."401Itka- ,‘"'„.41.4100' u, ..v:,---- 8111.‘'.- 0.- ".7sz.,*c... , NAt,,, ..,..„0.09„p01, ...,:r,,,;s• ; 1 ! ,..,$..:Ap,,,, • ,A+.‘ .....0;v4.v." ,, i., .-4". ' ' i-----77--///- z ----- .:=-Vialist5i1.1kliniffliartiviardif,TrziA0 'file 6r ,-:- ' ,,,, „05------ -__ -7/7.-,,,„4,. .,14?--r-r.--.4.----aw\-4674-iv.,4v , ,,,..<4,7, .1 ..,- ....... . 1;•„...,,, ,,,N. ..„,.. 0,...,..../AAF .;.,) , „/„,je c'',;:sr' - t-.--........ , / - ' .,-,;: -1 WM' \ ..lifir:,-:,:w V .- 4(;:# ,fr< /iir ,vt000rgett, 00.4. ....,_..:::.„:.:..,.?,.. . ,,... NxIlev,,....,.,._.,..,„„r. .. . ...,00,....416,; ..„ 40,0.;A :.::.:,, ,. .....4,14, ,,,,,,,,,-,,r.,..,„ ,_,,,, ., L„z P ,.W----5_---------:--7// .1 -101V:7-4-00..*Amdtp... 1*\:.•,:'7.:***:?T! *itt.N.4 / 7,. ' 6"' ' A A 44E,VW:<,,e,,,,#_*tr*** N * 10 '''::.::."''/OZ'Oile '`I'' . \',.--j....7-7-- / 1 1 , re /0.4Vi 4 <,k).; ' ii0<)41040 7 ,,.':' >r 1 ''' -KZ li i j..74:, ,\**. ,<:;1.444\. $.8:44,1/4rr'''''' ..0'' ''''' .."'''s- Z 1 ' ii ;','.;,•.'51'/ 5 ill -0 t-4 .,..„„.„, ,,,,,/,,„ .„ . ,...",,,„ ....... , „ %,.... ,_ z ,,„: ,,, :, q:1 yfti , o„, AL s , . ,,,z,„, 4 '4// S' S.N../ ' /*it'i‘ .•'- 404 4. ,.,, /,,e „.0;07,/, •, s„.Ike, , , , ,--; ,Ayotelk. 7' ,Aiwrogv. - Iv -:,, ,- ,:,--,,-or .7.'4 F.Zrral'"' 0‘.1 P. - _.Zp././7— 2 /Ili ' ii- • 41,,,4 - -.4*-<. .74.4,‘ ‘,04 ,-,----, 000v < 2 1 �-, ` �l � �� / . s U/� �% w, , . ` � r • . -:*** iliii Pi dieKO 98-20 //s.94,44,,,,,,y,,s,„,,,,,,,,. , ,. ,s,,, ,,,,. J.? ,,, PROJECT NO. DJW /=-- ,k. k 0 'it. * ,,\,,,,/40/2 t..4„. ,,,.. • ....,. _.\i#,, 4,,, .,,,,=5„,... 4- DRAY.•V P. 7-23-00 ISSUE OATE I . . 4*aiiVihri, skitpitio, /49,, --.464,.... Avviiirr,, .,, . / �- �, y; . E SCAL 1 -50• J i PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS a.$ !1 R- L -' 1 rig !ago of R.O I �� —rwe7� -I leru L�.i•G chi pp • F•operay `1 Su op•love Rea Ir _ 1 1w..r l+t. (1*- ‘s -- 11.11r.:11g911111 iv,.......lilvVq---• % %. it 111,,- '- 7,7_2.x-de.t..:e-•- ... • °� �► `-• �,m���, M��►�+ : , I��1a IPARKING DATA ��.• ii:ors,- I 0w :11:11111111/\ \ ��I " REWIRED PARKING: 319...".. .VI 4\ ' \ \• � COMPACT(30FeaFI 96 arr PARKING PROvIDED ♦♦ � " i FITIW I I LANDSCAPE DATA RF,-4e AR SIZE: GARAGE: 414 — 0��� 0 \ �� •� INTERIOR PARKING: 21b40 e.f. aM:P: 10 • �`��- STEEP SLOPE OPEN SPACE. 69,696 f. OPEN: ITI j NORTH OTHER LANDSCAPE AREA, 69691 cf. TOTAL REG. 335 •,40A • 44 rfaj TOTAL LANDSCAPE/OPEN SPACE I3D,933 a.f. COMPACT f 11.11t1 4l 'ri if • V TOTAL CT f 12. 341 �0'1�SY SITE PLAN PARKING LANDSCAPE DATA: TOTAL DATE: 01-5•98 SCALE 1.1 F:: : �� '-�� PARKRG AND DRIVEWAY. IG.19T a.f. Re km ♦♦���_ INTEPoOR PARKING LAPID6CAPNG:71040 off DIRT -"° ♦ BUILDING MATRIX UNIT MATRIX (314 fequired/ ♦ I (SITE PLAN DATA ♦ 1 E 3088 6030 5328 14646 2A61 1 E 8 7 10 ♦♦ �,/ 1 D 000 4660 4477 10007 3,660 7 D 6 7 0 ' - -� 3 C 1400 4060 4A77 11,110 1,992 3 C 6 1 0 LOT COVERAGE DATA: ./' .`7 4 D - 610 3090 3316 464 Z,190 4 D 4 7 6 SITE AREA: 465b56•.!. �' 6 E 3088 6030 431910002 .663 5 C 6 2 a BUILDING AREA(CROWD FLOOR). 9636•f. �' 6 D 000 4060 4,47710;08I 3pb0 6 D 6 2 a l C 1,480 4p60 4,427 II,11O 1,991 T C b 2 8 LOT COVERAGE: I- (eilawble:3333 / BLDG.COVERAGE MATRIX a A 6341 11002 11081 II062 38181 8 A 14 10 4 28 11'1PERNOW SURFACE DATA: T1A f"�R3 r No.or ewes T 345 9 C 1.48a Ia60 4A77 II,TTO 1,991 9 E a I 10 WILDING FOOTPRINT. 99116 et A 1108141.. 2 each I3,164af. 10 D 600 4660 4,422 10087 3,60 10 D 6 2 6 PATIOS f SIDEW4LKb: 14,910 cr. 5 3.400ef. 1 each 3.40065. II C 7,48a 4060 4,42I 11110 1,997 11 C b 2 9 C {460af. Teach 31360af R E 30aD 6030 53I814p46 I,46I G E 0 2 I0 DRIVEWAYS a PARKNG: Itl,191•f. 0 4.460of. 3 each 1330df. e C I,488 4660 4,473 11,110 1,997 13 C _ 6 2 0 M A 3341 11087 11087 113 587 38161 M A 14 10 4 26 E 533241. 3 each 5332•TTOTAL: (401e/ II60333 cr. D C tAeO 4p60 4,477 II,1T0 1,992 5 C 6 7 0 (15R allowable) F 5337a.f. Ieach 5533af. 16 F 330 6%60 5628 p36a 4,,34I 16 F 0 7 10 : r e.g 1350a.f. I seeh 1350a.f. f1 C 7.486 4,660 4,411 11110 I.997 Il C 6 2 8 i - SUe TOTALS 131:4 a.�5038.1 IB re.•ap 2350 a'te rgs• 13b0a./. 3 4050a.f. TOTAL 11087 $34"•31fuq✓ TOTAL 70 70 6 66 30 20 10 10] TOTAL 0.1141 8 Cevar4ge: 199,II6of. FREE TTANDING GARAGE (3 Md. 4Ne•1 AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "•••Planning TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL snow No TAMARON POINTE rma N,ro,.•aRa. Al OW 47111 Aro hr. RENTON,WASHINGTON „04„4�330 FAX 36 2121 07-ev8 , r _ a ��^\''a��''kuo\"•- --- ilikrill::000) ''.'.• ! 44d.„4' —. * /2. ,1 .\ illrill " NI (111111111174 N ® � l ., Steep Slope Area- Density Calculations V �1. . ` • • leae DU anoaed , N ,,,gym �- Wt._.... „0# 74/ , - ' AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "• '""° TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL ��� %w� TAMARON POINTS ..•...M �,�-- a RENTON,WASHINGTON ,p,,,,M„M I.,,,.,,,, m:zowe • BUILDING 14 BUILDING 13 r . . ';.7. "• • 1'411., Ill •' 1II, 'LI r w _ VII"- '�■ '. r ,ia _._per —,i_a, _. .� IhA 4Fiiiiir: PROPERTYUK --'": ENTRY DRIVE PROPERTY LINE Site Section A-A Lake Washington Blvd. 1 • �U 'V , ..$, •.41 ,j•+t. —BUILDING 8 ■';~ L'• / PROPERTYUNE BUILDING illill000 .� 7 ,N Jr.I ". w , r'f: Y I.. i ■ ■ • Site Section B-B PROPERTY UNE—f 1. AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma u ""'a ake Washington Blvd. TAMARON POINTE „..1.._w.n....PAh RENTON,WASHINGTON aw Ax 66 oa« wa«oouo FAX 34461 W-2U9E 1 �BUIpYC 19 'h p,00, �-/Gr rg,W 9 vaacarrwc Site Section C-C lake Wastington 61vd. • TAMARON POINTE • 94 CI T-0', 940.1 ----- .\ il—"'"'"" � _� \ is . topMplare • ■.c: :- 1)■ , ■■iri , In% 17i.,aRmllh1■— I — _ - . r • rop of P10.0d / . e.' lilt , RL Argil 1■ ■■' ■.i r!1i •{ nSlii a _ I 1 .r . ,'4,al (434 Sl:i�ropofplyAod r' 4, rr .-.,-.;,;%.,:,,„,,,•• ,,al • 1.' li -1f.: .. t li i ' n . ..1■ ■■. al AIL e1uG East Elevation 19T-0. i ems ' "1.Y 1ituli ,• '+ lit ! 'I @A" -IAI.,•I EX 1s• �3i t r 4i_.41��•,e■ l:warm a �y�,: .Ar1. :As. %i.i iert s. ! . ice" dseM I1 ;rival -sil, ns f� ■ _I la i,: _, '�� =ink = 11:'s fine,IAiii.iii 11 i --I;ig4iliiii I' ' s.d 1w +__:: 1 self;MI I 1111 IP �+s. ■ we�1 •ir rw111uAi� r��1d++ r a■ ■e3l� ■_-- -� _ D 11-1 1=i i.:+ g�ii! l.. l i aid 1. jai .;s S . illr_ I 1: �'_ .��_.. RI• e a, ; a]j :.msii:., i.:Is'AI!tri•i a �utiii.s. L • Yrf,� .a 111 I' `its •e� :l_ -_•r'Pei ...1 r .�, ■r - �' (i 111 :.3�ii� _ ... - w ,,,,._.;.::,, ._ GAi::�Ili• I fa,- '� ii�IN f': -I::�p7::� Bra a , I‘‘II kik, WI EI Ws! .•;". ' 7arts iii Et Typical Floor Plan w, 6 I ding]yp "A"- ilding_Zi6 i ding 14 similar) _ AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma !f'! TAMARON POINTE �..•-,--""�' RENTON,WASHINGTON „o,,,,o-O.. ,A,,,,,,,, 07R198 910.1 DV 9161 9161 f P-0' 911X1 —y I -�' ■II��L , �i II. ■■u 1l'.�— • _/I_\ \ __ ,top of plate 1' 1NNyl" NII1l':IIL, ■■ I _ marl w +o !■ ■■� •II i I ■■ 1■, 1 Ih,lt-' if ii ■� g,roporplywood jonikylr I. t� I—Ilk� N. Wtkq:€;a IN ■■� 1■Io■ I ,q;Nn@l, ■� - I. _ * "�!1,uYgl.fN 'r mP�Pl a A7, ■■I 1 1" I■ —■■' -- 1■ •rl'a 9N 7. `ger. 1NNI IIIIIIIq,I _ I!11i11`IIIIIW' ■■ ■■ I'et.qkx! �1 4 k■ I- 1v b ,1t., Po ■■', I ■■ jj♦�■■ 414311k ■■ 4,WIdWtl1I ,pofplywood - III 11" 171 I MEI ■�i off, -. . N 1.1 wil NM •,p of glob West Elevation • _midpoint of roof !'•. ' ■ • t"" .. Ili RIIINIg4u [ emu as. w+` ■■ Y/�r1gl�♦I Q + 1ll rim 1 ■■ ■■e f 1 ,' 95'w.Wa.arrw IAA..1rweb • ■ ■■ I' p.n.,.Ow lbw IMtO„n l94Y.@e it a.'1,w* — ■■ I / t i 1 r.a—O.rp.ra.r.l t +1 I ‘avarogp flnleh grade la pie I Elev Lion- Euildin 8(gull in 14 similal•J South Elevation AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "'-'"'°Ww••^a+r TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma A_ 5 TAMARON POINTE WON,* OW MAMMA At AAA RENTON,WASHINGTON NOWA WA WM rurat.r WA was y 860 CIS I86'1• r , C8i I60 /60 860 850 860 t Y-.Y •7 r g 1�� „Li—lip 111 , 7 20.1/%�ii n In i ',. s a.4:: 1::.al �in 11 ' �e I,I _ 1 c�e- -ice •�E , ' • 0�t:.AILL. ll .1 ai Second Floor Plan r 1r -"••=_ -x' -Lip _ ' I"tap - M E. d 11 W I° IF l_sti,,q: , ' It C 1 ;,I 1W4 Third Floor Plan III I50 ISO 860 850 860 860 CIS ii_ _— . F--. 4 • A IFI .., 41'I _■ _ ,: ,;� !P' � Building Typo C IS • III ,,i, 7 "p" r, t ra,al v '�:.is L Type"Ell Similar . .. kriI. z__�-�_ .3: =.�trii .:, or •t ' nndam p„,„,ng(Wha o�NTRY t :t i y _ i . Nits Awe First Floor Plan AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR ••" TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma _,„o A6 --- TA M A RO N P OI NTE • .•Ww..-..•l.. MM..Avois.ILL RENTON,WASHINGTON 841.11.14 VIAMO „ F."10„0 20.96 o- _ —CIO KO R50 ew aw aso ISO ao A0. . I O■ xlilillitill. 1midpoint of roof NO . ,ti dU1 �■ ■■$! fII!HJILI k j Al111..1 l,Il:IL ' � ; ■ _ N f yAI x�W%1I'NAIIN�I) — ■■■ f ��lgl P'Illtll llf11NI111III ,..11.114 I1 I`� i�4FI - 1:!:�4. ��j� average f3nlch grade North Elevation West Elevation CIO CIO .." or KO or BSO ol. DSO or ISO dr NO or MO dr / s. �. ill / ., r lin ..' ' Awe IL-�u1. ... . i r, fJ�. k�a�: 1 t'•_,/■■ _ -IVNn iv lr II _4 _ " i ' 111.11 J. LII� .Ivs 10 'fi.411"----'1 • . �li II dig 1 ou Elevation East Elevation Type"C" Elevation - Building 15 Type"E"Similar mi in. ,,. AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "'•'•••••••"•r�• TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma WoeA1 TAMARON POINTE .....e.las.NON"PA.Am MM WO/w MA RENTON,WASHINGTON 'ia1e'i WA oow Mr guar DOIK I46'1• i era MOI BIOR Bic YIOR BIOR MOR CIO rrqu Nece i " == s PI .:N ._ NII pit ii 14,411 ,ru �.�r y r.■ nT gilitr • -•-•+,• 4 gm! 1,_1011.. _spno cm sa:-.1 e , „, 1.1 isiur..u..i im...D.h.7 a-7- ei IR 0 _ 0 try'l•:;L €=Ii t.yCs i=.1 = 148'4. r I as MOR SKR NOR MOR + BIOR „ MOR , MR em Second Floor �'e _ — _ ■N:am■ =!IMIliin- I— gliPliii i!'), - I.:', " ill'i .111.,4 .1%.41 I". I li RI II ii . oor Plan �_ _ zL �h — __ Lrim W ILA _ _ _Rti�II ' � �i�t • � ' �' 141Y1• Third Floor Plan Mk pW BIOI NCR eat , BIOR , BIOR._-; CM5R '4 ,NE Ifil Ill III t Ix a. n 1W1I a �, I 1 1it • I�■._ I ICI I�� !=• I �� • C� t � �1 r, " n n. I� + -; L. C . •, 7 i!� 1•. n n Building Ty D - Building 6 pH: 7 _ ,— �'-- Type°13 &"F"Similar -. Wag Aeolus E .1.... IPIIIIRI Patid 4 II , . 1pth le 20'a Gents r ?.,ern arwAki. First Floor Plan AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR "•••^a.". TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma ...,.. TA M A R O N P O I N TE . .•bk•.Al.fenp,•..In.. RENTON,WASHINGTON /11061.:`oosw�r•s.ws.3.1 m 98 ; MSR y MOO _i101e 1 BOOR elan DIoa BOOR MR . Z . /\ \ i 1 - ..<...,,, I . '2, — M - // , 7- -4.NNI-- � '� /.,, /N - w_ midpoint drool "r ,i� '■ ■ I" ��■■kf:■�&I I■■ iftil� I w., iiii E II III i u'-.. ..l''1- 9 I■ ■■f. �� yid ■ li I �MO r II w1 u1LIII :■v IIr 2 qll iI i= d i I�i .t -i .. a —I _ 1 _P L. —'—'—�- --- L.Aln. i average flnich grade II IuI.�+1 W Ll l. 'n coda West Elevation _ outh !ovation MSR slow NO BOOR d, glow dr it 4, .MOP .4, MO 1 _ 4.. -- /\ tt r. l L•�' iLT�.1 and iee Mk WM la II IIll ILgI I . I% ill L = East Elevation North Elevation Tope_"D" Elevation - Buildin 110 Type"B"&"Fe Similar-r' = ,. AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR a TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma ...do TAMARON POINTE .wau.Nomp...... RENTON,WASHINGTON w.Fuoa,oLruw.a. ftwae (.04 a �:..� , s'. t : ".. �' 4 A, y R ,_ 'gp,•a f 4 ra r• -•"c girt a'4 vl); + �: ‘ \ ���\. yt J. h. {i � 11-111 1�1A _ ", ie i her \ lop : �� t i'• - —,.....,....ymt„r'�:._•• , -_ L.) 1 .1•"ley-[ 1.•1:-1 �� IRule At eakdinaeg `ii., Pool .. �1440, Sprinkler Equipment / R�,r, Room —��id�N®® �� ■riAt11�� r� .,. o�i®i�� �isØii r orsiiiii;N _--- iMI ���\fir► in AM MIP . ; IMP. ' • ■��■ 80���4M, ® Recreation Building and Site it I�� ' ti ^u• 4111iiimirl e®se: • MP Mp t� Moll Kiosk • - AN APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma A10 `° TAMARON POINTE .ILI K •� RENTON,WASHINGTON uo.1..00.,w FAX 3.2.4111 o7-so-ce • #7:=4:4 PLANTING SCHEDULE • •• SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 0 DESCRIPTION BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAPE SIZE h DESCRIPTION . _• ' PMIOMG 101 IREES TIED MOPE Rw� O ERA%INNS PENNSriVMIG GREEN ASH 2'CM_:FULL:MATCHED:STREET TREE OWL. O<.RHOS TYPHNUS NGS STAGHORN SUMAC BMEROOT.IB'-21'M. dillikkaa 'WaSwLL'S SEEDLESS' O LOVIOAMMBM SODDED. SWEET GUM 2'CAL:FULL:MATCHED;STREET TREE OWL. O ROSA ROOMS WILD ROSE BMEROOT.II'-21'M. O tELKDA SERPAIA CHINESE ZFLKDA 2'CAL:FULL;MARCHED;STREET TREE OWL OW SYUPWRILASsjaS ALBUS SNOWBERRT BYMEROOT,It-24'M. THOMAS RENGSTORF AND ASSOCIATES Intl VMNTIR MARSBN' DRNAMENTAL TREF HYBRKKIS ROSE I GAL.16'NM.SP.O.C. CRATAECAZS LAEYOATA'PAILS SCARLET' PAUCS SCARLET HAWTHORN 2'CAL:FULL:MATCIRD:12'-IA'M.IOW, 555. VI0URSUY 0AVIg1 ROCKK'S NBURNVY 1 GAT.]W'IRI.NP.O.C. IAv.s.... O WADS FLORIBUNDA JAPANESE FLOWERING 2'CAL.:NIL:MATCHED:12'-11'M.MN. GROUND COVER I nlu-IaHAa+c rAKaWea-N O CRABFLPLE SOD LAWN PRUNUS 51RHIRRLW'AUIUMNALIS' AUTUMN FLOWERING CHERRY 2'CAL;FULL;MATCHED MAIN.MIL 1 GAL.24'O.C.rm.SR YANOIIY NEATENS CREEPING MAHONN ➢TYTTTTOIS MFENT TREF, 1 GMR.THERU SAL,SA1 ' ' CMPNUS BETULUS'FASTIGUTA' O CETOIgPIM1UY JAPOM(:UY COLUMNAR HORNBEAM 2'01L;FULL;MATCHED MI BARCIAYS LOW-GROW NYD20SEED lea KATSIHU 2•CAL.:FULL;MATCHED;IV-IC M.MN. [] KM CO.COLOR: NYDROSCED MID SEASONAL COLOR: iF G BM —1D-LO I Y- PVFREJTEN FOUNDATION TREF NEW ZEALAND RAE IollulloOlOO CUPRESSOCWMS YLW STOW Or LEDII IEYLAND CYPRESS 6-5'Ill lull not sheared JAPMEY IRS J AR EY15M '[eY *ICIPN B US CONTORTA SHORE PINE 6-'Ill lull • SKVu ON. Or W PSEUDOTSUGA MENDE511 OOlIWAS FIR 6-0'Height.BtrB.lull wesrmu w �- A C MAR PUG M B'TA WESTERN RED CE 6- Nagle,BO, B.lun I I TAMARON POCKED QG ACER CNCNAIUM NNE HARE 1-5'NI.,CONI./BW9 I Aar AMNIA MOM STRAWBERRY TREE 5 GAL CONT.,21-24'M. STEEP SLOPES -- DO NOT i. ,TUB LANDSANDEn PLAN 0 BU%US SESPERWIENS SUITRDTICOSA MART ENG B0%W000 5 GAL CONT. I F PLANTING SCHEDULE © CwENOYELCS SP. FLOWERING QUINCE s GAL.CDIII..21-24'M. NC ® CURIOUS STOLOMIFERD RED-OSIER DOGWOOD I-I GAL.CDR. O CORYLLIS CORMLRA WISTERIA HAZEL 5 GAL CONT.,21-24'M. I r eaa - 6) EUOMTYUS JMONIG'AUREO-VARIECATA' EVERGREEN EUONTMUS 5 GAL CONT.,21-N'T. Qnn HYDRANGEA AUCROPNYW BSLEAF HYDRANGEA 5 GET.CONT.:FULL A .L", MAGNOLIA STELUTA STAR WGNOLM 5 GAL CONT.,21-24'M. A •PA `•Af ', _' _ ` YNONY ApRFOLIUY dtEGON CRAPE i-I GAL.CUNT. lyl•n•7�i Wp © AttRIG CNJiORN1G CALIFORNIA WAN MARE 1-I CAL COME. f. �;1F F'T` O OSMANTHUS DEUVAYI DELMAN OSMAMTNUS 5 GAL CONT.,21-24'HT. , `r/ ' / =L,-+. a • PHNADEIPHUS 1EM511 WILD MOCK ORANGE 5 GEL CONT..21-24'HT. SI 0 O PIERS JAPONKA LlY-OF-THE-VALLEY sIMRUB 5 GAL.COMT.,21-N'M. .1C ,I• V. 0 PRUNUS UUROCERASUS'SCWPIUENSIS' SCHIPNA LAUREL 5 GEL.CUNT.,21-24'NT. (e'y'�i_.I \ N O RNDDOODADRON'CLLRINCJMM'S WHITE' RNODODENORON 5 GAL CONT..21-24'M. p I" \\' YI AY ORES curioru2 REO-ROWERNG CURRANT 5 AN..CONT..21-N'M. 1�-S Zone ��ri 1='—I_.. `-J, a-. lT ® ROSA R1IGUSA LARD ROSE 1-2 GAL CONE. . ..' '?,'- �. 1 1 `A 1 e SNRAEA NIPPON.TOSACHSS SNOWYOUND SPIRALS 5 GAL COT.:FIRM 'Mr...•" '',...a",?, w SNOWMIXND' R� 1 • rnPHORIGAPoS AIBUs SNOBBERIES 1-2 GAL COT 7.<'e".::'� :j 1 MOM* a ® ACC..DATUM EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY 1-2 GAL CONT. `yJ'.: ::j- - T '\�IF1�^ . I'.,. CO • VIBURNUM PUGIUM TOUEx105UY OWBLEFILE VN UDNUu 5 GAL COO.,21-21'M. � ! •': _� ', \ �. O MAN.THUS UURUSTNUS s GAL CURT 21-N•M. . ♦: � PfiC� 1_ ICY �� eaquo rl. STEEP SLOPES -- ',Mkt** � o ©3^i`'��'l0e Ir.' `+ yFT�4��1t1 DO NOT D : OR or,CLEAR S \ � _. Tam C©., eE to•a e/ 14.0. CF `G .�A�©©0049.aGGGGO'3 m'•' .„iiii• ° .. \ , \ a E'er l •\ \ T c�' .ryui+,C ..r,.. iim ��' az,,,E7 ,. L1.0 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L1.3 C' '� 1 �(T� eY� . ; i 9. 71101 for >.T '' � LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALD I--2r.r -EIMM r iv L' M' 6N6FT,6,66 v1i Ir. 0 4- TROMAS RENGSfORF AND ASSOCIATES �o I 7.1 I N 1- R-8 Zone o R CO Ill W i/I - - — — — — w ._...... W TAMARON ro1NfE W (DISTURB OR CLEAR . • . tt X a q� 10 c s �'' '*Its,-,9 4; r = LANDSCAPE PLAN cam- .. f. 1 3 0 G " `1) w '+ U F�llo yok I �.^ ,yam^n _,g(� t, `',::-"`.,.s *I .. `''4 �' ' 1 li•/o/.. �6` /Gs' � `�'v�`�� aCs.. �i'cl.�•1 .:cs;�ai : = t'�i'� In : -2:i.4.`t-:. .•/ F ', / 11/�;: -.� �y�' ^.v gI�M.�E S. c� _ a !_f !i i .s.,• T I �II f: �� i� '-'gyp^.'.•:��'�'�Lvaa'` p�`� 0 `, .1 I �� XC, W ?mill 07 �. i I ! Q, s� \ �.� a:s,4f i n�7 �l 1 0 I 0 0 0 0 All' N' 1 1 El \ ''-' ', '---. 9 \ ' 1.:A '• • • rooc to a= o. -: 4-rj . ,...,5 e e ...,.,..e.:, 14 .,7` 77 7 1 1�T�+.. - �LZ.. r-fir (L�.a I'1 G;,,15 .1"I 2� \ fik-iid, N....„--.... .: 1, A ..,111„i,ll1i1..,,1.e1.1.i.A..4re.7.'"l..t,',1•,' ,.' "c / 9 l 01 31yJt D-� _ '4 Wlt D•1 `L , Ot ,, :T„.I.1'„-1,„0,,,,c1'',,:::.°•,s1'AS,'1 l'g,,l9,g.i3 .1 5It,.:.'rifi-1- 84)111 ...,t j•i°,sw=e 7T1i°•• i GQ ? l_"i S i 0 .i a� .. QI J rn� i ss•••s•••um ...Ai, }.�''"��e' CO, • tr=\�, 1 • w♦C -4 iG • °iai°rr°e��•i°°e°ie'a.• y4!i::�.- ►` 1a.L. o `�C•\r .. QC ,..- r.; M,WSTV•• ! " ---- 1 i= �� \ \°. a 7, 1 ` L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE:1^-20'-0" 0' 10' 20' 10' ms'om. • FR-S Zone RM-I Zone Existin Apartment project on adjacent property Cy THOMAS RENGSTORFAND ASSOCIATES I - - - itv i". c M.�..•.u�•= .„....41,004W,. '14:111:440W TritIV.V•fitelk''' 'delro::•.4"'*It-Alif- '1'4" ' ien'C. �+ `fie& I•,L • t 1 • i Ai lit, . 01_ . 0.,,lo .itii-,.."..„.., . ,., .._ ...... ......,,, ,,.,.,...... . ,,:::, , , .„,...._„, ._._ 7 1:4 Ai", ., '., c.,5 ...atiok4V-1-7 46n 4:10 . 1" . ..n:. 14.100101.1 • e4 ® 0a ,•• 4, ^• ��L Gown c- ;o ..�... •\\ d��l 'l u ��" f' r'�� \\ _,y.��R . � LANDSCAPE PLAN J J� uG. ������ ?' V .fS L� 'G , - ,s r Va.„,.•Z .dr,?. „�,D•; a /. (I) i(:‘ ' . Itlbi• ' , ,.. ' --,1-'‹ :<_,>\ e rr•.� C P' ho -aO L •• ` . _ rf�''ri'/' 4 F 1) 0 •Ir4 rl• tA e° r ,- - ��� �i \' X� •-- ,1 •'.,y F 1 3J i 0 • aa gs .444 ©lv•3 , <IV 2 I LANDSCAPE PLAN • ' SCALE:1--20'-0" r" 1111 r Ir 24P A/• uurr3os• . ..... • • .. ., .0% ...e4 • , ,,,,.0e.1iP,ifiiti - r, \ ,, ,, 40,,,...:"..t.1.1.3._1 ... -. . • ..:. th a IF ae. MATCHLINE -- SEE S • , , \ \ 7.1;i0P- ' \ \ 14 I I 11 I,t,Woliti I tii .•77.. ,.--.. ..,17: tritg t.,...* , . \ , \ ‘ \ let ,-0 • , --7 ,, \ \ , \ ..•,tsTrit, \' e.4-,,--olVi?:.- Avi , 4 '• \ o' ..iti.F!*1.44,10C ..- . . : 5,-5 , , .•.40 oholisv , lbar..17-0'... -• ,a,L,.' • ••P6e, .00014;d40.3 \ \ \ '.744 . .04,436ttfilt ,;-. ....:, ..:,.....-...g0WP.,,,„5441r173 I THOMAS RENGSTORF „. • \ •• eho ,- dcl:'''".• .Cell9Colit..•3 . ASP ASSOCIATES \ ‘ . \ % \ L 1::,..,..h_e-*44...4.,riy-zet4, • • • ,,•Tito•:, - e . :•:...,%,-estrz.4.9. t,,qitg,::•1' ..,001.c lie.t. It ,r, --- ,,±;.."..--4:14 ., ' \ \ \ , 1 - ,G02.ASPe. .-,, ••••,...4x4,,It.tekir.,,,,- ,. -., .•.r 'ow. r.;:', e •T"---- ,..,,,....., % / \ \ \ , Olt" I..::, •.`?----- ......--•" .410-'a . , 1. , . SDTOE ENPO TS_D I TEUS,RB-- O,.R-CLE,,AR 1__C,4, O-.4:,.1-7.1 111.111MF14 •,,.i s..._,. ,..... 21.„,,.::.„...•", .c.=.".m _,..,_,‘.•. :..,.„ . ,..: •,.,,..,_...c.,,'7.,,,,.:,,.,,„,' ,.,,e,' `3:.',,.-,•5 '•6 4:e'''';.: ' k1,11 C0° iawn, iPe<? AW.„,,aLtV.,.. 1914 Of 3•S._,,v..,., 11110,11‘.‘,g,'a,3-i.M-7ii:i, I0.W.,,,.-0.P A-dWe.• s W7%;N „,•- 0 ‘ N s i 0,•••.•;• •f •40t rieev°17.-.6.91?:70-.v.:pr 0.,,t-,•• .. • .011111:- Ills:: sse.00lit•••.••• • ,..:,.. • ••••••••P•••-• \ C1151? 4,11i.co \ i , 0 #7,,,..c• -2;. 0' 4)ie k IWA.;?1, .4 eV ,,,So 4:1:.*". "" ‘41101 •S‘u 0:1'4 illit' ,pS TAM RON POINTE ........ 1 , , -,,,., Qr. • ,,,C, „Al,,,.. nl, . tektir, 2 . ......,,,,- ••.ca, 0 15,-.1.-,pc,c LANDSCAPE PLAN -1114%. • -./ . CC * .;1,117,•cear."7.;40bgb.40...aeattiv. •-•.(1q,t , W or, , \ r, e„,0 .4,1010s4.etflo;c75:43:::%44:14.1741 -14i42,1•8::.:47;;;Me:glits:4 :6( A, .„,...... •• \1...0,c,, ,,. Rek,,, ,. • 'vf.7,.or • \ ,...„,,.:/00,:,:m do-40.-0-0i4002cs•,irdlat . ,,,,,, :o.(0.1:40„,.:40.(64!;•5:;:titcobotttrogifyitct.:tbroucialoeag,P40.*.:1-,....2_ - — - .a.4:. /SI.spire jje_,..... • .11.0; .....:044't%'' 1,1•4' ., Illkt: ec -0--errp.' .-•,ica GO . 4.,_ G":,,cp Ili 0• CO • .-.elk.-- .„ A -I a `;.',!',.,•:-....':. .01::::-- ...get ..,z) 43 0.19044.4.N.D.4.6:410.-,- . . '1 .'',1:. e,,.. . .•"elli ilittAattiale,t4 PdyreMPtitedond•e **,-- ,' &A.'' loreVa.4161Di'Vai"•itMe• '- 1 \ • a 4.*--7.- -c., • 4) re 0„*GeolprFali-'ilo). —e ‘ . , 4ifb..•,:„. Oak ew 0::,•e,.,.... 10- Os_ . •45. „ant;dre)o jiipja‘411, ' elik a 0101•7- ' '.. .01.---.e.rjr7, 40 wily "'1,- i-- a .,-, . 0 .,, . • el ..•• .....3,4,60 ., et.,.,% • .--ii,•.t.Mip,• I a - ,:oi.- - o• ,-, . ,, ..„ , ,,:,-,..w•-• _, 1 a -4 • - RI Zone -00 •• ..F..k., •--,', -. coo es, ;1/41re' ' -ie. ,- ,- ' 1.11-4kwItSIV• ..- ,.. , - ' .i '. I A •,,,,„..24 • cc .--,---:-.--,.....,„..t.:...::,.•A- zp..„ . , - , • - . ..-. ... . '1,4:ss:44,;.:*:•.'•••40. ........------- ,--. '',. ‘,; , - liro .. *o : .. •„,0 . \ '1 1:1 I - ..,.. •,- ' Ilr• c. ,A 1.; • '''. • . • .°tN_II,.,. ??1• ........."--':.....„ --------' - 1 4410tr/ .'k.44,nro °I. w.M.11 218..11 1. .., .'.'1 Of,•erj,..,,• .1..„„..........„.•,.."', . ' •,1 1..,‘ ‘.' ”.... SM. -.• I C..1.• . . ' . .• , , / • '"••,'Ll , '' •. ' • ,L ,, , . ,.... TIMPOIIMMIS kl:W:•4 0- , , I .. . , 1 I 1 1 L1.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE:I^ 21,41" -....1111.1111.11111M ---11111111.11 ir ir 20' 40. s.'”•or 6 • • . ...a •° a PV _ J `f'�iri� r•��i=ij•�i'�3i�lf.i' A L� .•,'a.''` .� °q��`. _ i •• las •T44••••••••b••••, s (711e. L�'•.,I7 j, 1;T\•p ►��'\%ram C� • 4:•.��� r •y`s•o c•s�•.•• •t•-•••.,•.,•-•rs„S ::r,.•S�..:. y y� lii/ I ?.•i f.•" •! ►�^ ..�•Y-r)„♦ L YT^G� rtr�^% •� ��� D��%�� A • ' .\.4� yy �=I� 11:0:40:440%.*- t . (,), „,, ., ,, ,„ gm. ..),• • ,„?..,,...„, \ , .\ 1 \\ `\� \ .,\I Ly C 11 ' 1::::' -// I ' I ' • �\ A•O� �C 1111 11 l-44 i 1 �), 1 °*fr4 #d( IT0 10 `Ij, �Pj ill" a (7.) (1900°. COO 0 •.... poi%,114,0 WrJ2iri, •Tt l t��ndl3 , or(! kI, I+►,• 41 l•• 4+i'l � " " �' p\ too .�^� ti4T4M1��Ai CP+aW�aiuu�taW"',Ga'a'Au?• j I -•• '�'4's ,,,to 1 \ \ 0`• �a,Q l' .. �,. �volis3itti(i ra2dla®'"055�GI?aW'1ti`rvD I �/ �' •�. o,iL �.• ••L+,.� ••`� , p pp)' d4/C1pf1IpW3yD22atIIai�W�Gid�I Allb �ici "� 'J • •r ..e x 4TW'PQGICA JIuQI 1 Wj4lir4lWfJaDT D@QIi7 Ju�Ap'n'/ u\rye • •• �' �!r IE11ypp'Ia,41617,W2��Jl`J4l(u �iu�GiprraZy�W: yD v I Ito ..`-fJ Q� * i �Tlylr[�p����4��DQW�clpQ,J.WGrQ-•yti�+ ^JQr9 �� ,R .. < pp•@ 4►t 01100 d6. 0Qgita utLr, 0, D@ 4,.P. Er�- <r •4 00g'21?�t011 ,u. �4, w1/6194W"a.0404 941,0016,to�4i(Dyta#,Bi9,0..1,- i rAMAR�nranrc o°• s iIW�/ .fJ.y4iQt. , (yf �`�0O49L1CJ`'14�G9i►WC�ivltJ IID. @W WCJ 'J • 4 W O �0:$sgtyb Jia /040yyWU! a .,, 0 400, itte -pa-' , L+^wer:r' E 101220, �7''yth00.0,10�0Licilu,,Vra 0 C-1�'1'.0 alma e•-riaSdJ'oo'recirmo-al•-r�yti,L. •1 4M0t,dr r'� ittG owi,„r10'a,4ry+,G,Dwo4j4G.se'Gloyco_,G,,,,D0r.90,2Y02,4'.,•?tJyfa,7,� ....,.,. tor,ip1r '1'IOab G,,G:1 Jt07.0 :.9,ro@dr',`G1++r'�a•Wa1PGpQDG,,G,G, .G-do.�,l4! v y 0 41 LANDSCAPE PLAN 'tiicetr adoo4,Web'Ooo0-to,�ovoW��0101,.w S ,;;;Nr� °caap" j - 1 t v ' 1 ,1 \ti••, • • t A- �` � ' o mu mom mmoo LANDSCAPE PLAN 41 4 SCALE:1"-a•..„ 0 • • • • • • • • il 1 r_o‘t eve- , 0, , il0 ,P.R.SONARS LEveL mATCASS N SO ew RN. a THOMAS REI'IGS ORF n limit) D Q )\\If / AND ASSOCIATES Berm r �k���'A Plonting Mulch-Depth.7" FERTILIZER.PLACE none TO Rua, MLW APTLKATKM. CONTROLLED !������i rAr•`����^l.�'�'"'SA.+�as SpOGliled P n,EI�"e .7E- Ei=J%sC 2%ROOISPREAD CRNIU CS ERTIVLI E N� a • • AIR PRIOR TO BARK • \el•/ ♦ ♦ '4.?...,:. _ n%Pm.GRADE • MULCH APPIICAipN „oR Ryn•w..0 s,um� E}IJILI ��� -III-:_I BARN a=w000cHv L[N ♦♦♦♦♦♦ i111=11 iI I TL ,11 ' BURLAP SACK MNI 2-OMIT.FEATHER TO ♦♦♦♦ • • zx�l I , .,:• t��„ PLACING PEEL LF 6 TREE ROOT�AQtOrtR=Dn BASE Oi PLANT. v ta�CR TTED TWIST.GRADE . �r eacnAL BoII,TNOImuDHLT DATER - `"4 NATIVE$OIL I I—III-1=11=II=1 E.aaILL SOIL AFTER PLANT/NOT TTt=T fi fn m ro►Aorm evKPILL 604E ♦ ; ♦, Bonk?Native Bkf ill = PA _• _ Material• /% / / A / /' I SHRUB PLANTING Z BAREROOT PLANTING .-. y O NOWA. O RDEE ../// #i • Planting On LeveI Grade •-K �_� Plontkfq Mulch-Depth.2' "1 riat,' 7P .AMA Or Gy$pEGIfIEd • 6 1 0.v�:�l jT` TAMARON Poirem ;NtiTTIE,ST,k/111,47 moo.. d w �,/J I'�Wq I�JT 5.= N '2, O• L PLANTING DETAIIS • 4't .., , Arun ]TiN. / t�i A=.u..�_ NIQ a+• F ..:Al.I'\ moo,an 61aP. ,o EAGKPIwHe 0 '-' T-f If;a jsK• STRAND ENCASE I d-ADE ��/�� RE ENCASED M 1'OIA I]6]ST,t I1�1 TH� h Flu FI� RIMER HOW Planting On A Slope _ _ �I AO/,, ' /,,4 Ne, PLANT SO THAT Tor or ROOT 0 FERTILIZER- MLLH�ATLICArpN. ' // / / C.O.t.� EALL 45 LEA ce TH M \ \/ ` "' / ''deFERTILIZER-PLACE PRIOR EARK 1 A ]•SARK MX. G MACH APPLICATION. —O O— Pw SALGOe HTN Sa•GOMI=AYAIS R=N MID;MACH-2.USER \/\/\/ )<- °"`NM•!laHeTMRADe 4�� ' '/ �CprtMbuS TRR6L =>a. PLANT SO THAT TOP OP ROOT • E. "4/ /,.�A FORM SAUCER I/00U HIM Villea A A/ rAlTau0n0r,ALL HALF �E.a�i li I: :/ Mew lo• V HATTER.TAPE POCKETS TO 000A OAIRN I Very e=s SEE SPECIFIED MARTINS HK. \ ��- ./ n Ale REMOVE ALL H6APnxe J \ J /\ DO /\(gwNfet/\ ; 2KAK!'-0• dIa/a FRCP TOP TOLE a Mu. • \` I �✓. ,..�.�,. — (RATER..-.•uRPO rs STAKES nmoFr� S.rA.Pm raP60A SEE'mare,PLANTINs mix. I SPACE&DT, t T TAPPED TOPSOIL • Planting Pattern `'CAREYTO••OEM - o 'I xARPTroA•aE.M �� DNta.a.OU e.p.aRW H PR plot table -_—.—ROOF!K.IT 12.PALL D. I I 1 e �• CITIL OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 02, 1998 Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF,V-H Dear Mr. Wayland: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on September 30, 1998, issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall on October 27, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Approval and Variance. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, ennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Ms. Norma Cugini/Owner Mr. Gerard Shellan/Owner Mr. J. Steve Harer/Owner Mr. Alex Cugini, Jr./Owner Parties of Record Enclosure DNSMLTR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by current site development. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$388 per each new multi-family residential unit, and $0.52 per square feet of non-residential development. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee, equivalent to $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall follow recommendations of Geotech Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study for Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments (dated June 18, 1998). DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNit-iCANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Building Department 1. Recommendations of the applicant's soils report must be followed. 2. The current Uniform Building Code followed used by the City of Renton is the 1997 version. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow for the "A" buildings is 4,500 gallons per minute (gpm). For the "E" buildings, the minimum fire flow is 3,000 gpm, and for the "F" buildings 3,250 gpm. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feel of each of the buildings and one additional hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow is required within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarms and sprinkler system installation in each building. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$70,616.00 is estimated to apply based on $388.00 per each multi-family residential unit, and an additional $1,326.00 for the proposed recreation center, based on $0.52 per square foot of the building square footage. 4. The divided main access is required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide on each side of the divider. Each gate would need to be 20-feet wide with fire department emergency access. Plan Review-General 1. Drawings submitted for the construction permit are required to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 2. The project site is located within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. Plan Review-Water 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is$510 per unit and is to be paid at the time the construction permit is issued. The estimated cost for 182 units is$92,820.00. Tamaron Pointe Apartments LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF,V-H Advisory Notes (Continued) 2. The project is located in the 435 water zone. Static pressure will require a pressure reducing valve. 3. The loop water system is required to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Legal description document to be provided for review with 15-foot easement. 4. Water mains would need to be separated by a minimum of 10-feet from storm and sewer lines. 5 . A backflow prevention device is required on the domestic water service when the building heights are over 30-feet. 6. Storz fittings are required on the Fire hydrants. 7. Water valve location and size are to be noted on plans. Plan Review-Sanitary Sewer 1. The .Sewer System Development Connection charge is $350 per unit. The estimated fee for 182 units is$63,700. 2. A vertical profile of the sewer system will be required for the construction permit. Sewer lines are to have a 2% slope to property line. Sewer lines on site to be labeled "Private". 3. Maintain proper horizontal separation of 10-feet from water and a minimum of 7.5-feet from storm. The minimum vertical separation is 18 inches or greater. Plan Review-Storm Drainage 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is$0.129 per square feet of new impervious surface area. Existing impervious surface area and new impervious surface area to be provided on construction plans. From the site plan and project overview there is a discrepancy with the King County record concerning the site area. King County indicates a site area of 515,253 square feet. There are several important considerations to address. This site is developed currently as a mobile home park. The redevelopment credit is appropriate to apply. There are undevelopable steep slope areas shown on the plan as 69,696 square feet. These areas should be confirmed as greenbelt areas and as such are exempt from the SDC fee. There must be a calculation of new impervious area in order to determine the amount of the surface water SDC fee. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with elevations. Provide datum and benchmark. 3. A Level#1 Storm Drainage analysis is required per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Address all Core Requirements and Special Requirements. Special Requirements 5 and 6 to be specifically addressed. _ 4. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator Catch Basin or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5,000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 6. A vertical profile of the storm system is required. 7. The applicant must prove that a storm detention system is not required as stated in item number 10 below. 8. Calculations must be provided to show that the peak rate for the 100-year, 24-hour duration design storm event is calculated to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the predeveloped peak runoff rate for the proposed project site existing runoff conditions. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. City estimated trip generation is 735 daily new trips. Therefore the estimated fee is as follows: $75 x 735 = $55,125.00 Mitigation fee. Tamaron Pointe Apartments LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF,V-H Advisory Notes (Continued) 2. Off site improvements are curb, gutters and sidewalks required on Lake Washington Blvd. N. the full length of the property frontage. A five(5) foot minimum planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. This also included sufficient roadway widening to provide for a bike lane. 3. An additional off site improvement, street lighting is required for Lake Washington Blvd. N. covering the full length of the property frontage. Street lighting to meet City of Renton Standards. Lighting level is 0.6 ft-c minimum and uniformity ratio of 4:1 minimum. 4. All overhead electrical and communication cables abutting to the property frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. under 55-kV to be installed underground in coordination with the electrical and communications utilities at the developers expense. Trenching and conduit location and size for the electrical and communication facilities to be shown on the construction plans. 6. Entrance and roadway grades not to exceed 8%. A variance must be requested for grades above 8%. 7. The gated entrance must have sufficient vehicle queuing to prevent backup onto the arterial. 8. Truck hauling to be scheduled during off peak traffic conditions which is between 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM. Parks and Recreation 1. A Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per new apartment unit would apply to the proposal. The value of the recreation center can be credited against up to 33% of the Parks Mitigation Fee. In addition, credit for the existing 92 mobile homes may be given. 2. The proposed landscaping appears to stop at the property line, and there is a gap between the landscaping and the new sidewalk. Landscaping should extend up to the sidewalk, and also be maintained by the owner. The existing 4-foot wide at-grade bicycle trail (on both sides of Lake Washington Boulevard) is not noted on the drawings. The proposed curb, gutter and sidewalk required that the bicycle lane be widened from 4-feet to 5-feet(curbed roads require a 5-foot minimum width for at-grade trails). The Lake Washington Boulevard bicycle trail is part of a regional trail system and can not be included as part of the sidewalk. Development Services Division 1. The proposal requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit as a portion of the site is within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Line for Lake Washington. 2. The project site is zoned RM-I (Residential Multi-Family Infill). Densities are permitted with the range of 10 du/ac minimum and 20 du/ac maximum. Building heights in the RM-I Zone are limited to 35 feet or 2-1/2 stories. Additional stories and up to an additional 10 feet in height may be requested through the Site Plan Review process. 3. The proposal requires a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner in order to consider the Site Plan. 4. As part of the Variance request, staff will recommend that erosion control and sedimentation control measures be in place along Lake Washington Boulevard, and that the applicant submit weekly reports from the geotechnical engineer documenting the progress of the excavation, fill, and required street improvements (construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, bike lane, etc.). RENTON ♦/' ammo ..at Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 01, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) onSeptember 29, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED TAMARON POINT APARTMENTS LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,V-H,ECF John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. Location: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, Reim") ennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy AGN(YLIx[Xx 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 1998 TO: Jennifer Henning FROM: Carolyn Boatsman SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apts; Ribera Project I have started receiving Neil Watts' monthly project status report. I am using it to try to provide early input re: possible aquifer protection structural needs for proposed buildings. It is likely that the Tamaron Pointe project will include an area or areas where chemicals are stored for the purpose of cleaning,maintenance, or,perhaps,operating a pool. If so,the project should incorporate an area that provides containment for chemicals. The volume required is equal to the size of the container for one container, or, for multiple containers, 150%of the size of the largest container or 10%of the volume of all containers added together,which ever is larger. Containment areas should be made of a material that will not be corroded or dissolved by the chemicals that will be stored there. Sealed concrete or plastic are suitable for many situations. Often an entire room can serve as containment if the sides are bermed and the floor slopes towards the middle. It is important that such a room NOT incorporate a floor drain. A chemical storage room can't serve as containment if spilled materials can go down the drain. It is unlikely that, at this stage in the development,the developer will know exactly what chemicals will be present. They should just take a best guess and over size the containment area so that it will serve typical needs that come up over the life of the building. It is not critical that they hit it right on the mark as it is relatively easy to install portable containment. The same requirement may be necessary should the Ribera Project eventually include senior apartments. Please call me at x7211 should you wish to discuss. Thanks. cc. Neil Watts hmmp/jh0998xoc.doc CITY:OF:RENTO CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 2151 day of Oc , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERc, deSevvv‘kviatervks documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy (Signature of Sender) t k• Se-costar Y- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that AnditAi., 94 - &e signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act f6 the uses and purposes • mentioned in the instrument. Dated: /D- S�-cif `e A/ ,1K ..c4W Notary Pu c in and for the State'of Washington Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF My appointmet6W 29%99 Project Name: -raw+a ov► Po‘v`�e. Project Number: Lk.)/N. 98- l23 %IA ,Stv,,V, Et..? NOTARY.DOC David Sager Kim and Theo Brown Rich and Susan Hopkins 1025 North 28th Place 1003 North 28th Place 2511 Park Avenue North Renton, WA 98056 - Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Eric and Cindy Korn Charles Jensen Bill Barlwo 1211 North 28th Place 2621 Meadow Place North 2100 Lk Washington Blvd. #91 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Shirley and Odell Milliren Tina and Jerry Cullers Mr. and Mrs. James Scott 1020 North 28th Place 2506 Meadow Avenue North 1405 North 28th Renton, WA 98056-2173 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Manfred and Anne Hansen Dean and Cynthia Schumacher Nancy Stark 1221 North 26th Street 1116 North 28th Place Mark Mykel Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 1409 North 26th Street Renton,WA 98056 Dean H. Schellert Donald and Patricia Rosburg M.L. Gibson 1013 North 28th Place 1402 North 26th Street 1215 North 28th Place Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Barbara Smith Robert and Esther Miller Rich Wagner 1308 North 26th Street 1121 North 28th Place Baylis Brand Wagner Architects Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 19801 Main Street Bellevue, WA 98004 LaVerne and Mary Jo Graves Steve and Julie Wasson Marlene Mandt 905 North 28th Place 2515 Park Place North 1408 North 26th Street Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Patrick McDonald Barry Oman Glyn Gardner 160 Vashon Place NE Friends of Youth 2100 Lake Washington Blvd#84 Renton,WA 98059 2500 Lake Washington Blvd North Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Song Qiao Ms.Norma Cugini Mr. John Wayland 1412 North 26th St 611 Rrenton Avenue South Trammell Crow Residential Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE#330 Kirkland, WA 98033 Mr. Gerard Shellan Mr. J. Steve Harer Mr. Alex Cugini Jr. 11 Lummi Key 11326 Rainier Avenue south 4101 Lake Washington Blvd. Bellevue,WA 98006 Seattle,WA 98178 PO Box 359 Renton,WA 98057 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: October 05, 1998 DATE OF DECISION: September 29, 1998 SIGNATURES: • ei/2-7q1 Depm erm Adminisfrator DATE / artme t oflvianning/Building/Public Works (71-f/v77_:2-dei.,(i f(.3q( Jim Shepherd, Administrator' DA Community Services aZr Le eW e er it DATE Rento Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC i DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by current site development. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$388 per each new multi-family residential unit, and $0.52 per square feet of non-residential development. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee, equivalent to $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall follow recommendations of Geotech Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study for Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments (dated June 18, 1998). DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF APPLICANT: John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Building Department 1. Recommendations of the applicant's soils report must be followed. 2. The current Uniform Building Code followed used by the City of Renton is the 1997 version. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow for the "A" buildings is 4,500 gallons per minute (gpm). For the "E" buildings, the minimum fire flow is 3,000 gpm, and for the"F" buildings 3,250 gpm. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feel of each of the buildings and one additional hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow is required within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarms and sprinkler system installation-in each building. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$70,616.00 is estimated to apply based on $388.00 per each multi-family residential unit, and an additional $1,326.00 for the proposed recreation center, based on $0.52 per square foot of the building square footage. 4. The divided main access is required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide on each side of the divider. Each gate would need to be 20-feet wide with fire department emergency access. Plan Review-General 1. Drawings submitted for the construction permit are required to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 2. The project site is located within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. Plan Review-Water 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is$510 per unit and is to be paid at the time the construction permit is issued. The estimated cost for 182 units is $92,820.00. • Tamaron Pointe Apartments LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF,V-H Advisory Notes (Continued) 2. The project is located in the 435 water zone. Static pressure will require a pressure reducing valve. 3. The loop water system is required to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Legal description document to be provided for review with 15-foot easement. 4. Water mains would need to be separated by a minimum of 10-feet from storm and sewer lines. 5 . A backflow prevention device is required on the domestic water service when the building heights are over 30-feet. 6. Storz fittings are required on the Fire hydrants. 7. Water valve location and size are to be noted on plans. Plan Review-Sanitary Sewer 1. The .Sewer System Development Connection charge is$350 per unit. The estimated fee for 182 units is$63,700. 2. A vertical profile of the sewer system will be required for the construction permit. Sewer lines are to have a 2% slope to property line. Sewer lines on site to be labeled "Private". 3. Maintain proper horizontal separation of 10-feet from water and a minimum of 7.5-feet from storm. The minimum vertical separation is 18 inches or greater. Plan Review-Storm Drainage 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square feet of new impervious surface area. Existing impervious surface area and new impervious surface area to be provided on construction plans. From the site plan and project overview there is a discrepancy with the King County record concerning the site area. King County indicates a site area of 515,253 square feet. There are several important considerations to address. This site is developed currently as a mobile home park. The redevelopment credit is appropriate to apply. There are undevelopable steep slope areas shown on the plan as 69,696 square feet. These areas should be confirmed as greenbelt areas and as such are exempt from the SDC fee. There must be a calculation of new impervious area in order to determine the amount of the surface water SDC fee. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with elevations. Provide datum and benchmark. 3. A Level#1 Storm Drainage analysis is required per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Address all Core Requirements and Special Requirements. Special Requirements 5 and 6 to be specifically addressed. 4. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow threugh an oil/water separator Catch Basin or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5,000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 6. A vertical profile of the storm system is required. 7. The applicant must prove that a storm detention system is not required as stated in item number 10 below. 8. Calculations must be provided to show that the peak rate for the 100-year, 24-hour duration design storm event is calculated to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the predeveloped peak runoff rate for the proposed project site existing runoff conditions. Plan Review—Transportation 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. City estimated trip generation is 735 daily new trips. Therefore the estimated fee is as follows: $75 x 735 = $55,125.00 Mitigation fee. Tamaron Pointe Apartments LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF,V-H Advisory Notes (Continued) 2. Off site improvements are curb, gutters and sidewalks required on Lake Washington Blvd. N. the full length of the property frontage. A five(5) foot minimum planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. This also included sufficient roadway widening to provide for a bike lane. 3. An additional off site improvement, street lighting is required for Lake Washington Blvd. N. covering the full length of the property frontage. Street lighting to meet City of Renton Standards. Lighting level is 0.6 ft-c minimum and uniformity ratio of 4:1 minimum. 4. All overhead electrical and communication cables abutting to the property frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. under 55-kV to be installed underground in coordination with the electrical and communications utilities at the developers expense. Trenching and conduit location and size for the electrical and communication facilities to be shown on the construction plans. 6. Entrance and roadway grades not to exceed 8%. A variance must be requested for grades above 8%. 7. The gated entrance must have sufficient vehicle queuing to prevent backup onto the arterial. 8. Truck hauling to be scheduled during off peak traffic conditions which is between 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM. Parks and Recreation 1. A Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per new apartment unit would apply to the proposal. The value of the recreation center can be credited against up to 33% of the Parks Mitigation Fee. In addition, credit for the existing 92 mobile homes may be given. 2. The proposed landscaping appears to stop at the property line, and there is a gap between the landscaping and the new sidewalk. Landscaping should extend up to the sidewalk, and also be maintained by the owner. The existing 4-foot wide at-grade bicycle trail (on both sides of Lake Washington Boulevard) is not noted on the drawings. The proposed curb, gutter and sidewalk required that the bicycle lane be widened from 4-feet to 5-feet (curbed roads require a 5-foot minimum width for at-grade trails). The Lake Washington Boulevard bicycle trail is part of a regional trail system and can not be included as part of the sidewalk. Development Services Division 1. The proposal requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit as a portion of the site is within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Line for Lake Washington. 2. The project site is zoned RM-I (Residential Multi-Family Infill). Densities are permitted with the range of 10 du/ac minimum and 20 du/ac maximum. Building heights in the RM-I Zone are limited to 35 feet or 2-1/2 stories. Additional stories and up to an additional 10 feet in height may be requested through the Site Plan Review process. 3. The proposal requires a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner in orderlo consider the Site Plan. 4. As part of the Variance request, staff will recommend that erosion control and sedimentation control measures be in place along Lake Washington Boulevard, and that the applicant submit weekly reports from the geotechnical engineer documenting the progress of the excavation, fill, and required street improvements (construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, bike lane, etc.). I NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA98-123,SA-H,SM,V,ECF The applicant has applied to develop a 182-unit multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, variance, and a shoreline substantial development permit. Location: 2100 Lake Washington Blvd North. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA on October 27, 1998 at 9:00 AM to consider the Site Plan Approval and Variance. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: October 5, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot • N.onoE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,V-H,ECF John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.88 acres.A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units,a one-story recreation center,and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed.The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes.All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed.The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review,site plan approval,and a shoreline substantial development permit,as a portion of the site Is located within 200 feel of Lake Washington. The applicant Is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance In order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces.Location:2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS NED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSEIMPACT ONITHE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required S75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are , govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-118. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall on October 27,1998,at 9:00 AM to consider the SITE APPROVAL AND VARIANCE. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. 1•! ~ 'lib '' , .,<'r'np• 7 4^'�Y-7r-4 t>' e ° fR8' a RI ns ° "• a ':7 '1lP A, hr� RC 4`3t 111 t EFeWl. :,--i'r7...„ �� WR BY R8� Mlfm-. .P' cL ' r %� . TAMARON POINTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, P LEASE ES S V SOON AC THE CITY0 OORENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVIDO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I IPlease include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, i AAI r t vl t�i i , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on cc--fiver 2, t99B • Signed: ki ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and/for the State of Washington residing in Il e7j4'1 ,on the day of pc/ . /6/4 —272(0t-e- .)) .4. 22-eii.,--# • MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 110\ 1[1(001E ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,V-H,ECF John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units,a one-story recreation center,and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. Location: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the 7th floor of City Hall on October 27, 1998, at 9:00 AM to consider the SITE APPROVAL AND VARIANCE. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. e:rr 53r- sY v �j BA 1 v rri e 1♦ a t i rr ?::-'8'8 m l r P1 i, A Ls�• .1iq' 9. RR. ,�7ess ' •j'14 11P oR °5" aua� r e tl WaP. - o; ch. e ,Ks,py, -r .tp . R g �, �, 1 Ytt,ittR8 of,/N1.R8�Fr~ ,ff�WI:. '� •r. _ . t4tt 7rIYiil� - �N tip pf:fd-rs `d'R g � • .13 a t '- iO4-4 +ro`� , '° —�s'...1 R TE�"`F�p,•', RM I r y *'1'-' ,,*'a ,! 1„1 r - n n._. >.-r N,g VO :+; e �, ,�� 1�i 6 9 W�' - R,- I ''100,19;,.i .-• , .. N-aaM r r111 ax • LAKE WASIBUCT011 1 6 4 "r-f dyhb,hood pi.. r ti R �1 TAMARON�POINTE 'md - )•• FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE September 29, 1998 Project Name Tamaron Pointe Apartments Applicant John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 File Number LUA-098-123, SA-H, SM, V, ECF, SA, ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth Henning Project Description The applicant has applied to develop a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. The site contains 9.08 developable acres, with 1.6 acres of steep slope that would be left undisturbed. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 rental units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The dwelling units would consist of 126 two-story townhouse units and 56 flats. Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of grading (cut/fill) would occur on site as a result of project construction. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. A variance is also requested from the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance in order to clear and grade steep slope areas adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard. A modification has also been applied for from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. Project Location 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. Exist. Bldg. Area gsf 92 mobile homes to be Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf approx. 305,000 s.f. removed Site Area 10.69 acres Total Building Area gsf approx. 305,000 s.f. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated(DNS-M). ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department F rnmental Review Committee Staff Report TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123,SA-H, V-H,SM-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 29,1998 Page2 of 7 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE- MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by current site development. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$388 per each new multi-family residential unit, and $0.52 per square feet of non-residential development. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee, equivalent to $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. 4. The applicant shall follow recommendations of Geotech Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study for Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments (dated June 18, 1998). Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Building Department 1. Recommendations of the applicant's soils report must be followed. 2. The current Uniform Building Code followed used by the City of Renton is the 1997 version. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow for the "A" buildings is 4,500 gallons per minute (gpm). For the "E" buildings, the minimum fire flow is 3,000 gpm, and for the "F" buildings 3,250 gpm. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feel of each of the buildings and one additional hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow is required within 300 feet of each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarms and sprinkler system installation in each building. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department 1 9nmental Review Committee Staff Report • TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123,SA-H, V-H,SM-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 29,1998 Page3 of 7 3. A fire mitigation fee of$70,616.00 is estimated to apply based on $388.00 per each multi-family residential unit, and an additional $1,326.00 for the proposed recreation center, based on $0.52 per square foot of the building square footage. 4. The divided main access is required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide on each side of the divider. Each gate would need to be 20-feet wide with fire department emergency access. Plan Review -General 1. Drawings submitted for the construction permit are required to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 2. The project site is located within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2. Plan Review -Water 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is $510 per unit and is to be paid at the time the construction permit is issued. The estimated cost for 182 units is $92,820.00. 2. The project is located in the 435 water zone. Static pressure will require a pressure reducing valve. 3. The loop water system is required to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Legal description document to be provided for review with 15-foot easement. 4. Water mains would need to be separated by a minimum of 10-feet from storm and sewer lines. 5 . A backflow prevention device is required on the domestic water service when the building heights are over 30-feet. 6. Storz fittings are required on the Fire hydrants. 7. Water valve location and size are to be noted on plans. Plan Review-Sanitary Sewer 1. The .Sewer System Development Connection charge is $350 per unit. The estimated fee for 182 units is $63,700. 2. A vertical profile of the sewer system will be required for the construction permit. Sewer lines are to have a 2% slope to property line. Sewer lines on site to be labeled "Private". 3. Maintain proper horizontal separation of 10-feet from water and a minimum of 7.5-feet from storm. The minimum vertical separation is 18 inches or greater. Plan Review -Storm Drainage 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square feet of new impervious surface area. Existing impervious surface area and new impervious surface area to be provided on construction plans. From the site plan and project overview there is a discrepancy with the King County record concerning the site area. King County indicates a site area of 515,253 square feet. There are several important considerations to address. This site is developed currently as a mobile home park. The redevelopment credit is appropriate to apply. There are undevelopable steep slope areas shown on the plan as 69,696 square feet. These areas should be confirmed as greenbelt areas and as such are exempt from the SDC fee. There must be a calculation of new impervious area in order to determine the amount of the surface water SDC fee. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with elevations. Provide datum and benchmark. 3. A Level #1 Storm Drainage analysis is required per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Address all Core Requirements and Special Requirements. Special Requirements 5 and 6 to be specifically addressed. 4. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator Catch Basin or adequate biofiltration system. 5. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5,000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 6. A vertical profile of the storm system is required. 7. The applicant must prove that a storm detention system is not required as stated in item number 10 below. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment I 'mental Review Committee Staff Report TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123,SA-H, V-H,SM-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 Page4 of 7 8. Calculations must be provided to show that the peak rate for the 100-year, 24-hour duration design storm event is calculated to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the predeveloped peak runoff rate for the proposed project site existing runoff conditions. Plan Review --Transportation 1. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. City estimated trip generation is 735 daily new trips. Therefore the estimated fee is as follows: $75 x 735 = $55,125.00 Mitigation fee. 2. Off site improvements are curb, gutters and sidewalks required on Lake Washington Blvd. N. the full length of the property frontage. A five(5) foot minimum planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. This also included sufficient roadway widening to provide for a bike lane. 3. An additional off site improvement, street lighting is required for Lake Washington Blvd. N. covering the full length of the property frontage. Street lighting to meet City of Renton Standards. Lighting level is 0.6 ft-c minimum and uniformity ratio of 4:1 minimum. 4. All overhead electrical and communication cables abutting to the property frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. under 55-kV to be installed underground in coordination with the electrical and communications utilities at the developers expense. Trenching and conduit location and size for the electrical and communication facilities to be shown on the construction plans. 6. Entrance and roadway grades not to exceed 8%. A variance must be requested for grades above 8%. 7. The gated entrance must have sufficient vehicle queuing to prevent backup onto the arterial. 8. Truck hauling to be scheduled during off peak traffic conditions which is between 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM. Parks and Recreation 1. A Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per new apartment unit would apply to the proposal. The value of the recreation center can be credited against up to 33% of the Parks Mitigation Fee. In addition, credit for the existing 92 mobile homes may be given. 2. The proposed landscaping appears to stop at the property line, and there is a gap between the landscaping and the new sidewalk. Landscaping should extend up to the sidewalk, and also be maintained by the owner. The existing 4- foot wide at-grade bicycle trail (on both sides of Lake Washington Boulevard) is not noted on the drawings. The proposed curb, gutter and sidewalk required that the bicycle lane be widened from 4-feet to 5-feet (curbed roads require a 5-foot minimum width for at-grade trails). The Lake Washington Boulevard bicycle trail is part of a regional trail system and can not be included as part of the sidewalk. Development Services Division 1. The proposal requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit as a portion of the site is within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Line for Lake Washington. 2. The project site is zoned RM-I (Residential Multi-Family Infill). Densities are permitted with the range of 10 du/ac minimum and 20 du/ac maximum. Building heights in the RM-I Zone are limited to 35 feet or 2-1/2 stories. Additional stories and up to an additional 10 feet in height may be requested through the Site Plan Review process. 3. The proposal requires a public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner in order to consider the Site Plan. 4. As part of the Variance request, staff will recommend that erosion control and sedimentation control measures be in place along Lake Washington Boulevard, and that the applicant submit weekly reports from the geotechnical engineer documenting the progress of the excavation, fill, and required street improvements (construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, bike lane, etc.). ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department F rnmental Review Committee Staff Report TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS L UA-98-123,SA-H, V-H,SM-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 29,1998 Pages of 7 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: The proposal would result in increased traffic trips on the local road system as a result of project construction and occupancy. City Code Section 4-18-3 requires applicants to provide haul route plans for approval by the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of a construction permit. Haul hours are also restricted by the Code, to occur only between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, unless approved in writing in advance by the Development Services Division. These requirements are intended to diminish impacts to the transportation system resulting from the construction of a project. In addition, traffic control measures are required to be provided during construction. These measures are associated with the construction permit for site utilities and infrastructure. The proposal would utilize the two existing driveway cuts for ingress and egress to the proposed development. Primary access for Tameron Pointe would be from the southernmost driveway located on the Lake Washington Boulevard North. A keycard-activated gated access is proposed at the main entrance. Planted landscape islands would divide the ingress and egress lanes. Landscape plans show detail of this area, and indicate that the ingress lane would be 20-feet wide, while the egress lane would have 15-feet of clear area. Fire Prevention has commented that the ingress/egress lanes and access gates on each side of the divider would need to be a minimum of 20 feet wide. There appears to be sufficient area available to accommodate 20 foot wide travel lanes, either through the widening of the lanes or by decreasing the size of the landscape islands. This issue will be addressed through the Site Plan Review process with the Hearing Examiner. The access drive from Lake Washington Boulevard North at the north end of the site would be used by residents to exit the site. The driveway would also function as a two-way emergency access drive. The north driveway is shown as 25 feet wide and would intersect with Lake Washington Boulevard at an acute angle of 30 degrees or less. This driveway angle is existing but is awkward and could affect sight distance for vehicles leaving the site and making a left turn to travel north on Lake Washington Boulevard North. In addition, the driveway angle conflicts with City Code Section 4-14-4:b.5 which states that: "The angle between any driveway and the street roadway or curb line shall not be less than 45 degrees." Staff will recommend as a condition of Site Plan Review that the driveway angle for the northernmost drive be modified to either a 90-degree intersection with Lake Washington Boulevard or an angle between 45 and 90 degrees that is acceptable to the City's Development Services Division and Transportation Systems Division. The project would generate additional traffic on the local and regional street system upon occupancy. The applicant has provided a traffic study which indicates that the 182-unit proposal would generate approximately 624 new average weekday trips. The City's analysis of the project proposal utilizes information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual and a trip factor of 6.47 trips per unit to the proposal. Credit would be given for the trips currently generated by the existing site development with 92 mobile homes. According to the ITE Manual, the trip factor for mobile home parks is 4.81 trips per unit. By using the ITE numbers, staff concluded that the 182 apartment units would generate 1,177.54 weekday trips (182 units x 6.47 trips = 1,177.54 trips). The existing mobile home park generates 442.52 trips (92 units x 4.81 trips = 442.51 trips). By subtracting the mobile home park trips from the apartment trips, the difference is 735.02 trips (1,177.54 apartment trips- 442.51 mobile home park trips = 735.02). Tameron Pointe would result in 735 new average weekday trips that the would impact the local roadway network. In order to mitigate impacts of the new trips generated by the project, a Transportation Mitigation Fee would apply to the project, at a rate of$75 for each new average daily trip. The fee is estimated to be $55,125 and would be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 for each new average weekday trip attributable to the project. Credit may be given for existing trips generated by current site development. The fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance (Section 4-6), Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution ERCRPT.DOC V City of RentonPB/PWDepartment I mmental Review Committee Staff Report TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS LUA-98-123,SA-H, V-H,SM-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 29, 1998 Page6 of 7 2. Emergency Services-- Fire Protection Impacts: The development of 128 apartment units as flats and townhomes in 17 buildings, and a 2,550 s.f. recreation center would impact the City's existing emergency services. All new development in the City is subject to a Fire Mitigation Fee. The fee is assessed at a rate of$388 per each new multi-family residential unit, and $0.52 per square foot of non-residential area. For the 182 residential units, the Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $70,616 (182 units x $388 = $70,616. The proposed recreation center would be subject to a Fire Mitigation Fee equivalent to $0.52 per square foot. Based on 2,550 s.f., the fee for the recreation center is estimated to be $1,326 (2,550 s.f. x $0.52 = $1,326). The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$388 per each new multi- family residential unit, and $0.52 per square feet of non-residential development. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance (Section 4-6), Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution 3. Parks and Recreation Impacts: The proposal for 182 new multi-family residential units would impact the City's parks and recreation facilities. New residential development proposals are subject to a Parks Mitigation Fee equivalent to $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. Credit for up to one-third the amount of the applicable fee can be given for recreation facilities provided as part of the project. The proposed recreation center qualifies for this credit. In addition, some credit may be possible for the existing mobile home park development. The Parks Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee, equivalent to $354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit. The Parks Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building permit. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance (Section 4-6), Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution 4. Geotechnical/Soils Impacts: The applicant has provided a geotechnical engineering report for the proposed 182-unit development. The report was prepared by Geotech Consultants in June 1998, and notes that the project site is disturbed, having undergone extensive grading, which likely occurred as a result of the mobile home park development. The ground surface over the majority of the subject site slopes to the southwest. Along the western and northern sides of the site, 50% to 70% slopes are present. Observation at the site and subsurface explorations performed by the geotechnical consultant resulted in the conclusion that the Tameron Pointe proposal appears to be feasible provided recommendations of the study are followed. The study noted that fill previously placed on the site is loose soil and would consolidate under even light foundation loads. The study concludes that no structures should be placed on the existing fill. Dense and very dense native soils are capable of supporting buildings on conventional foundations. In some areas, overexcavation, then backfilling of the overexcavation with structural fill, could be used for buildings where competent native soils lie within approximately 5 feet of the planned bottom of excavation. For areas with deeper fill, deeper foundations are suggested. This would probably affect proposed buildings 5, 7, 9 ,11, 13, and 15. Portions of other buildings could potentially be affected as well. The construction methods for deep foundations include augercast concrete piles or driven piles. Heavily-reinforced closely-spaced piers would be needed for the downslope sides of Building 11,13, and 15 to retain soil under the buildings in the event of slope movement. Other recommendations of the report include: additional test borings for areas of the site not presently accessible due to site development; location of utilities and irrigation lines away from areas that could experience soil movement; and the construction of catchment walls at the toe of cut slopes to collect, or slow soils that could slough off of the slopes. In addition, the report states that disturbance of the western slopes should be avoided, to prevent a decrease in the stability of these slopes. In particular, fill should not be placed within approximately 15 feet of the crest of these slopes. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department I mmental Review Committee Staff Report TAMARONPOINTEAPARTMENTS LUA-98-123,SA-H, V-H,SM-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 29,1998 Pagel of 7 In order to mitigate impacts of the development on the site, staff will recommend that the applicant follow recommendations of Geotech Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study for Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments (dated June 18, 1998). Mitigation Measure: The applicant shall follow recommendations of Geotech Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study for Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments (dated June 18, 1998). E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 19, 1998. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERCRPT.DOC CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1998 TO: JENNIFER HENNING FROM: NEIL WATTS j' ';; j SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDIES: TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS, LABRADOR PLAT AND THE BLUFFS We have reviewed the traffic studies prepared for three proposed projects on Lake Washington Blvd N: Tamaron Pointe Apartments, Labrador Subdivision and the Bluffs. The reports have been prepared per methodology acceptable to the City and standard engineering practices. The assumptions used and conclusions reached are acceptable, and should be relied upon in the land use review of these projects. The three reports conclude that there will be no significant degradation of levels of service for traffic in the area as a result of the construction of these three projects. The combination of information within the three reports provides analysis of three key intersections within the area: (1) Burnett Av N & Lake Washington Blvd; (2) Burnett Av N & N 30th St; and (3) Park Av N & Lake Washington Blvd. The PM peak was used for purposes of this analysis as it represents the highest traffic volumes during a typical day. The results of these studies for these intersections is summarized in the following table. Level of Service Level of Service Intersection -Without - Including Projects Projects Burnett Av N &Lake Washington Blvd A A Burnett Av N & N 30th St A A Park Av N &Lake Washington Blvd C C Traffic mitigation fees of$75 per net new average daily trip will be required for both the Tamaron Pointe Apartments project and the Labrador Plat. The Bluffs project completed its SEPA review prior to the adoption of the City-wide traffic mitigation policy, and may not be subject to these fees. Tamaron Pointe Apartments: No additional traffic mitigation measures are recommended. The northerly driveway should be reconfigured to allow for exiting vehicles to be perpendicular to the street prior to exiting onto Lake Washington Blvd. Full frontage improvements including curbs, gutters, sidewalk and street lighting will be required per City code. • 0 SEPTEMBER 25, 1998 PAGE 2 Labrador Plat: The traffic report notes that the sight distance to the north on Burnett Av N from the new entry street will be 250 feet. While this exceeds the recommended minimum stopping sight distance of 150 feet, it is less than the recommended minimum intersection entering sight distance of 330 feet. Therefore, additional mitigation measures are warranted as recommended in the traffic study. The project approval should include the following conditions: 1. The developer shall install advance warning signs along Burnett Av N to alert approaching vehicles of the intersection. A stop sign shall also be installed for the new entry street at the intersection with Burnett Av N. 2. The developer shall grade the westerly portion of proposed Lot 1 to maximize sight distance to the south of the new intersection. The developer shall also work with the City in installing the required street improvements along the Burnett Av N frontage in a manner which will not reduce the available sight distance to the south of the new intersection to less than 330 feet. No additional traffic mitigation measures are recommended. Full street improvements including curbs, gutters, sidewalk and street lighting will be required per City code. Queries to prepare comments on the Tameron Pointe Proposal. 1. Did the Marina Landing have to get a variance to build 3 story structures rather than 2 '/A story structures? 2. As part of your growth management plan do you require developers to anticipate future impacts rather than just the immediate scenario,i.e. 10-20 year horizon? 3. Can you calculate the difference in new traffic that would be generated if the trip rate rather than trip equation were used to determine the new traffic generated by the proposal? 4. Why did the developer choose to go all apartments rather than townhouse plus apartments? • Does this create a whole new application or merely modification of the old application? • Will there be a new transportation study? • Will there still be parking below the building in the all apartment proposal? e•WI? I GOW51- , q.. Jennefer Toth Henning To: avabill@transport.com Subject: RE: Tamaron Pointe Proposal Bill -- 1 . Marina Landing is also known as Lincoln Properties. According to the computer data base that I have access to, the Site Plan was approved by the Hearing Examiner with 3 conditions on March 22, 1985. It does not appear that a variance was part of this application. You are welcome to research that project in the City Clerk's office. The file number is SA-85-007. The City Clerk is located on the 7th floor of the Renton City Hall Building, and the office is open 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. They can be reached at (425) 430-6510. For the Tamaron Pointe Apartments proposal, the RM-I Zone permits heights of 35 feet and 2-1/2 stories. Additional stories and up to an additional 10 feet in height are permitted if approved through the Site Plan Review process. No variance is needed to request the additional height as proposed by Trammell Crow. . 2. The City prepared an EIS on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code adopted City's work to meet the requirement of the State's Growth Management Act. The EIS looked at the future impacts associated with the densities permitted by the adopted zoning. Individual project proposals complying with the zoning and comprehensive plan are subject to environmental review and other land use approvals as required by the City Code. The analysis you refer to has already been accomplished on a city-wide basis. 3. The City uses trip equations for projects such as this to give a more accurate portrayal of the proposed development. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) manual is used to determine the average weekday trip rate for a particular development proposal. The ITE rate is the basis for determining the Traffic Mitigation Fee that applies to a given proposal. 4. As I mentioned in our telephone conversation today, the proposal is a multi-family development for 182 units. The units consist of both townhomes and flats, and are referred to as "apartments" because they would be for rent units. The City can not and does not legislate whether properties are developed on a "for sale" or "for rent" basis. A total of 126 towhnouses and 56 flats are proposed. The description of the project that you saw in the notice of application has not changed. Parking will be provided for 171 vehicles in surface parking areas, while 144 garage spaces are provided under the townhouse structures. Also 10 handicapped accessible spaces are provided. I hope this information assists you in preparing your comments. From: avabill@transport.com To: Jennefer Toth Henning Subject: Tamaron Pointe Proposal Date: Thursday, September 24, 1998 1 :39PM < <File Attachment: QUERIES .DOC> > Can you please answer the following queries (attached) so I can prepare a more informed set of written comments on the Tamaron Pointe Proposal. Page 1 I Jennefer Toth Henning From: avabill@transport.com To: Jennefer Toth Henning Subject: Re: Tamaron Pointe Proposal Date: Thursday, September 24, 1998 4:38PM Thanks for the rapid response to my queries Has the site plan review committee already approved a request to exceed the 35' height ceiling? Also I noticed that the developer claims the new development will not significantly alter the area of impermiable surface, are they assuming that the entire area under covered by the trailer is impermiable, or are they calculating only the surface that has concrete or asphalt surface. Could you clarify this for me it wasn't explicit in the environmental statement of the proposal. Page 1 Jennefer Toth Henning From: Jennefer Toth Henning To: avabill@transport.com Subject: Re: Tamaron Pointe Proposal Date: Tuesday, September 29, 1998 1:20PM Sorry for the delay, I hope this answers your questions. 1. The applicant has requested the additional height above 35 feet as part of the application. The Hearing Examiner will consider this request as part of the Site Plan Review public hearing on Tuesday, October 27th. 2. According to the Technical Report submitted with the application, the existing amount of impervious surface on the site is 44.62%, while pervious surface is 55.48%. With the proposal the impervious surface would increase to 50.7% with 49.3% impervious. From: avabill@transport.com To: Jennefer Toth Henning Subject: Re: Tamaron Pointe Proposal Date: Thursday, September 24, 1998 4:38PM Thanks for the rapid response to my queries Has the site plan review committee already approved a request to exceed the 35' height ceiling? Also I noticed that the developer claims the new development will not significantly alter the area of impermiable surface, are they assuming that the entire area under covered by the trailer is impermiable, or are they calculating only the surface that has concrete or asphalt surface. Could you clarify this for me it wasn't explicit in the environmental statement of the proposal. Page 1 e (rnAti CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF . SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: 1 A-M POINT A 4'AkIZTM T5, APPLICATION NO: I-t-' � � S12k 'H �l'H, SWl The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER St MiAiI't O. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, 01 . 4 cl y r->e s , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records • ISI'Title Company Records ❑ King County Assessors Records Signed (/Zd/ Date 7—//" q g (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Sufscri ed and sworn before me, a Not ry Public, in an for t�I e State of Washi gton, residing at on the % day of ��t� Pi1 6`-2j - , 19 qc. Signed 141,&t,l2 L ` r712,6•141 (Notary Public) •*+* o F r`:City of'Renton Uses''�'t CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, S v tWt , hereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to (City Employee) each;listed property owrier on t $ Signed k_. Date : 5 1 NOTARY ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of<Washington residi.nq a� �) 7 on the ' day of • S� igned �.y listprop.doc REV 07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 ., ID II • Northrn Santa Fe Burlington CITY OF RENTON Thomas Cooke 1700 E Golf Rd#400 200 Mill Ave S 12630 84th Ave S Schaumburg, IL 60173 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98178 FOSS LAUNCH&TUG CO Gary&Marcie Palmer Vincent H D Executor Abbey 660 W Ewing St 2507 Park PIN 9005 21st Ave NW Seattle,WA 98119 Renton,WA 98056 Seattle,WA 98117 Manfred&Anne Hansen AETNA#7954(SEP) Paul Undiano&Judith Johnston 6947 Coal Creek Pkwy SE#800 PO Box 188246 1325 N 24th St Newcastle,WA 98059 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Renton,WA 98056 Lewis Jones Roger Fleming&A Van Carla Helen Shook 1401 N 24th St 1404 N 24th St 1405 N 24th St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Betty Holma David Lincoln Gary Parker 1409 N 24th St 1412 N 24th St 1301 N 26th St Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Kathleen Gianini R A Hammond Catherine&Richards Galvin 1311 N 26th St 1313 N 26th St 2407 Garden Ct N Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Richard&Annabelle Wagner James&Cheryl Matheson Kevin&Priscilla Lee 2411 Garden Ct N 2417 Garden Ct N 2420 Garden Ct N Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Walter Grieser CITY OF RENTON FRIENDS OF YOUTH 2423 Garden Ct N 200 Mill Ave S 16225 NE 87th St#A6 Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 Redmond,WA 98052 FRIENDS OF YOUTH CITY OF RENTON Jack Ring 16225 NE 87th St#A6 200 Mill Ave S PO Box 4000-378 Redmond, WA 98052 Renton, WA 98055 Pahrump,NV 89041 George Collier Joseph&Botero Irene Taiwo Robert Radnich 2419 Meadow Ave N 5896 123rd Ave SE 2501 Meadow Ave N Renton,WA 98056 Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98056 • Richard Tennent&M D Helen Gary&Paula Dubois Gary&Marcie Palmer 2505 Meadow Ave N 2415 Park PI N 2507 Park PIN Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Richard Hopkins Julie Grove Gary&Renee Arnold 2511 Park PIN 2515 Park PI N 2520 Park PI N Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Transnation Title Insurance Company FOR: BY: Julie H. Trammell Crow Residential DATE: 09/10/98 4010 Lake Wash. blvd NE #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 Number of Pages: Bellevue Customer Service 188 106th Ave NE #660, Bellevue Wa. 98004 (206) 646-8795 (206) 646-8595 Fax King (WA) COUNT :36 Your Search Parameters Parcel Number. . .36 052305 9010 052305 9051 229650 0170 229650 0151 229650 0140 229650 0150 229650 0144 229650 0145 229650 0143 229650 0138 229650 0142 052305 9023 052305 9063 052305 9064 052305 9065 052305 9066 229650 0123 229650 0126 229650 0129 229650 0134 229650 0132 229650 0130 229650 0136 052305 9033 052305 9004 ' I.—..,cation Title -Bellevue Customer S.,,....e Owner : Burlington Northrn Santa Fe Parcel# : 052305 9003 01 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : 1700 E Golf Rd#400 Schaumburg I160173 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $922,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 3 R/W SEC 5-23-5 Q : SW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 11.50 YB: Ph: Owner : Fleming Roger M&Carla A Van Parcel# : 052305 9004 00 Site : 1404 N 24th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 12/20/91 Mail : 1404 N 24th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $220,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 4 POR OF SE 1/4 Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm :4 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,480 Ac: .44 YB:1956 Ph: 425-226-4360 Owner : City Of Renton Parcel# : 052305 9010 02 Site : 2550 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date Mail : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use : 349 Rec,Parks,Zoos,Arboretum Asd.V : $24,312,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 10 GL 2 SD SEC Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 3.51 YB: Ph: Owner : Gianini Kathleen M Parcel# : 052305 9023 07 Site : 1311 N 26th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 1311 N 26th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $172,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 23 POR OF P C R Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,280 Ac: .53 YB:1943 Ph: 425-255-6510 Owner :Undiano Paul H;Johnston Judith E Parcel# : 052305 9024 06 Site : 1325 N 24th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 02/27/98 Mail : 1325 N 24th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $510,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $320,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 24 LOT 1 OF CITY Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R :05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /2 Stories: 1 BldgSF: 4,110 Ac: .21 YB:1991 Ph: Owner :Jones Lewis H Parcel# : 052305 9025 05 Site : 1401 N 24th St Renton 98056 Sale Date , Mail : 1401 N 24th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $323,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 25 LOT 2 OF CITY Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm :4 Bth F3H: 2 /1 /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 3,400 Ac: .18 YB:1981 Ph: Owner : City Of Renton Parcel# : 052305 9033 05 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date Mail : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $100 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 33 RESERVE STRIP Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: YB: Ph: Owner :Lincoln David M Parcel# : 052305 9037 01 Site : 1412 N 24th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 05/15/98 Mail : 1412 N 24th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $398,500 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $360,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 37 LOT A OF CITY Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 3 / / Stories: 2 BldgSF: 4,890 Ac: .18 YB:1996 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • ' 1,~.,,,nation Title -Bellevue Customer£., ....e Owner : Cooke Thomas H Parcel# : 052305 9039 09 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : 12630 84th Ave S Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $100,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 39 POR C&PS RR Q : SW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 4.90 YB: Ph: 206-772-4923 Owner :Foss Launch&Tug Co Parcel# : 052305 9051 02 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : 660 W Ewing St Seattle Wa 98119 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $1,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 51 TR 4 OF Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .05 YB: Ph: 206-281-3872 Owner : Grieser Walter Parcel# : 052305 9063 08 Site : 2423 Garden Ct N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2423 Garden Ct N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $251,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 63 PARCEL A OF L Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 5 Bth F3H: 2 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,360 Ac: .31 YB:1978 Ph: 425-271-1919 Owner :Matheson James K&Cheryl J Parcel# : 052305 9064 07 Site : 2417 Garden Ct N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 02/13/89 Mail : 2417 Garden Ct N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $280,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $369,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 64 PARCEL B OF L Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R :05E Bedrm :3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 1 BldgSF:4,160 Ac: .38 YB:1985 Ph: 425-271-4989 Owner :Wagner Richard L&Annabelle Parcel# : 052305 9065 06 Site : 2411 Garden Ct N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 09/01/92 Mail : 2411 Garden Ct N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $506,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 65 PARCEL C OF L Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 4,280 Ac: .34 YB:1991 Ph: 425-255-4161 Owner : Galvin Catherine&Richards Parcel# : 052305 9066 05 Site : 2407 Garden Ct N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 09/13/83 Mail : 2407 Garden Ct N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $60,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $419,000 Lgl : STR 052305 TAXLOT 66 PARCEL D OF L Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 /1 / Stories: 2 BldgSF: 4,710 Ac: .39 YB:1985 Ph: Owner :Hammond R A Parcel# : 229650 0123 00 Site : 1313 N 26th St Renton 98056 Sale Date Mail : 1313 N 26th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $176,000 Lgl :LOT 23 ELDON ACRES ADD POR WLY OF Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,470 Ac: .19 YB:1965 Ph: 425-226-1265 Owner :Tennent Richard C&Helen M D Parcel# : 229650 0126 07 Site : 2505 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 09/08/95 Mail : 2505 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $197,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $188,000 Lgl :LOT 24 ELDON ACRES ADD NLY 75 FT Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,780 Ac: .39 YB:1950 Ph: 425-228-6139 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. 7run3nation Title -Bellevue Customer S Owner :Radnich Robert B Parcel# : 229650 0129 04 Site : 2501 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 05/28/82 Mail : 2501 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $155,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $267,600 Lgl : LOT 24-25 ELDON ACRES ADD POR Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 1 /2 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,020 Ac: .42 YB:1974 Ph: 425-226-3457 Owner : Collier George F Parcel# : 229650 0130 01 Site : 2419 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 2419 Meadow Ave N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $158,000 Lgl :LOT 24-25 ELDON ACRES ADDS 20 FT Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,360 Ac: .29 YB:1958 Ph: 425-226-1912 Owner :Taiwo Joseph A&Botero Irene Parcel# : 229650 0132 09 Site : 2421 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 07/23/97 Mail : 5896 123rd Ave SE Bellevue Wa 98006 Sale Price : $195,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $172,000 Lgl : LOT 25 ELDON ACRES ADD LOT 1 OF Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R :05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,860 Ac: .21 YB:1966 Ph: Owner :Lee Kevin&Priscilla Parcel# : 229650 0134 07 Site : 2420 Garden Ct N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/07/95 Mail : 2420 Garden Ct N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $99,500 Full Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $428,000 Lgl :LOT 25 ELDON ACRES ADD LOT 2 OF Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 BthF3H: 3 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 5,190 Ac: .16 YB:1997 Ph: Owner :Ring Jack Parcel# : 229650 0136 05 Site : 2411 Meadow Ave N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 10/07/91 Mail : PO Box 4000-378 Pahrump Nv 89041 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $157,000 Lgl :LOT 26 ELDON ACRES ADD LESS E 150 Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,240 Ac: .57 YB:1935 Ph: Owner :Dubois Gary B&Paula Parcel# : 229650 0138 03 Site : 2415 Park P1 N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 04/29/88 Mail : 2415 Park P1 N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $415,000 Lgl :LOT 27 ELDON ACRES ADD Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 5 Bth F3H: 2 /1 /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 4,810 Ac: .81 YB:1988 Ph: 425-277-6853 Owner : Palmer Gary D&Marcie M Parcel# : 229650 0140 09 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : 03/15/90 Mail : 2507 Park PIN Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $30,000 Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $30,000 Lgl :LOT 28 ELDON ACRES ADD LOT 28 LY Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .64 YB: Ph: 425-271-0454 Owner :Arnold Gary&Renee Parcel# : 229650 0142 07 Site : 2520 Park P1 N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 11/14/86 Mail : 2520 Park P1 N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $60,400 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $318,000 Lgl :LOT 28-29&ELDON ACRES ADD LOT 1 Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 3 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,460 Ac: .32 YB:1988 Ph: 425-255-2211 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. Title -Bellevue Customer S... Owner : Palmer Gary D&Marcie M Parcel# : 229650 0143 06 Site : 2507 Park PI N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 11/12/85 Mail : 2507 Park P1 N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $176,000 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $243,000 Lgl :LOT 28-29&ELDON ACRES ADD LOT Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R :05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 1,880 Ac: .23 YB:1985 Ph: 425-271-0454 Owner :Hopkins Richard D Parcel# : 229650 0144 05 Site : 2511 Park P1 N Renton 98056 Sale Date : 04/13/87 Mail : 2511 Park PI N Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $54,500 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $341,000 Lgl : LOT 28-29&ELDON ACRES ADD LOT 4 Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF:4,300 Ac: .25 YB:1989 Ph: 425-226-9289 Owner : Grove Julie K Parcel# : 229650 0145 04 Site : 2515 Park PIN Renton 98056 Sale Date : 06/30/88 Mail : 2515 Park PIN Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $94,500 Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $290,000 Lgl :LOT 28-29&ELDON ACRES ADD LOT Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 2 / /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF: 3,200 Ac: .15 YB:1943 Ph: 206-228-1392 Owner : Parker Gary I Parcel# : 229650 0150 06 Site : 1301 N 26th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 07/08/92 Mail : 1301 N 26th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : $172,500 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $166,000 Lgl :LOT 29 ELDON ACRES ADD POR SD LOT Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R :05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 2,000 Ac: .24 YB:1955 Ph: 425-226-3996 Owner : Hansen Manfred&Anne Parcel# : 229650 0151 05 Site : 1221 S 26th St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 06/03/91 Mail :6947 Coal Creek Pkwy SE#800 Newcastle Wa 98059 Sale Price : $290,000 Full Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $298,000 Lgl : LOT 29 ELDON ACRES ADD POR SD LOT Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 4 Bth F3H: 2 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 3,030 Ac: .78 YB:1979 Ph: Owner :Friends Of Youth Parcel# : 229650 0170 02 Site : 2500 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 16225 NE 87th St#A6 Redmond Wa 98052 Sale Price Use : 173 Res,Resort,Lodge,Retreat Asd.V : $838,900 Lgl : LOT POR ELDON ACRES ADD 33 THRU 38 Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 2 BldgSF: 9,324 Ac: 4.57 YB:1971 Ph: Owner :Friends Of Youth Parcel# : 229650 0170 02 Site : 2500 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date . Mail : 16225 NE 87th St#A6 Redmond Wa 98052 Sale Price : Use : 173 Res,Resort,Lodge,Retreat Asd.V : $838,900 Lgl : LOT POR ELDON ACRES ADD 33 THRU 38 Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 13 Bth F3H: 1 /4 /1 Stories: 2 BldgSF:7,558 Ac: 4.57 YB:1970 Ph: Owner :Holma Betty M Parcel# : 334450 0235 05 Site : 1409 N 24th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 08/24/94 Mail : 1409 N 24th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $148,000 Lgl :LOT 332 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R :05E Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,880 Ac: .77 YB:1929 Ph: 206-226-2378 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. Ti w—ation Title -Bellevue Customer Se, Owner : Shook Helen E Parcel# : 334450 0236 04 Site : 1405 N 24th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 09/17/92 Mail : 1405 N 24th St Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price : Use : 101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V : $200,200 Lgl :LOT 332 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 /1 / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 1,640 Ac: .18 YB:1979 Ph: 425-226-2875 Owner : Abbey Vincent H D Executor Parcel# : 334450 0290 07 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date : Mail : 9005 21st Ave NW Seattle Wa 98117 Sale Price : Use : 901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $80,000 Lgl :LOT POR HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q :NW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 3.95 YB: Ph: 206-783-9035 Owner :Aetna#7954(Sep) Parcel# : 334450 0315 08 Site : 1300 N 20th St Renton 98056 Sale Date : 07/01/93 Mail :PO Box 188246 Carlsbad Ca 92009 Sale Price : Use : 114 Res,Apartment,100 To 199 Units Asd.V : $8,687,000 Lgl :LOT POR HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF Q : SW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 3 BldgSF: 153,348 Ac: 7.75 YB:1986 Ph: Owner : City Of Renton Parcel# : 334450 0775 01 Site : 1100 Lake Washington Blvd N Renton 98056 Sale Date : Mail : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : Use : 349 Rec,Parks,Zoos,Arboretum Asd.V : $32,394,000 Lgl :BLK 360&LOT ALL HILLMANS LK WN Q : SW S : 05 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: 24.00 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. • CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION • 'OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the tSti5 day of Se tewt'o..r , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing v1oihc.c. of a pp'%Cattah (revised) documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing C'at.,rtte% o Reco v& Ca, a ved Stare. vtvuse.a I C►-he� t (Signature of Sender) Saysdva, k. Se•euirt,— STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SA -na,le- 911". f'e c� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fofrthe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: /6 - Notary Public in 'd for the State of Wasir l on Notary (Print) M®RI VAI KAMCHEFF My appointment expiL : Project Naive: -Tarna.votn 1=6tv.-C� ,p„ets Project Number: L.A.)Pc — 98 _t.L3 Slat-IA, V—H, SVY1►eLt NOTARY.DOC OX WWG-Z 'r ' David Sager r Kim and Theo Brown Rich and Susan Hopkins 107.5 North 28th Place 1003 North 28th Place 2511 Park Avenue North Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Eric and Cindy Korn Charles Jensen Bill Barlwo 1211 North 28th Place 2621 Meadow Place North 2100 Lk Washington Blvd. #91 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Shirley and Odell Milliren Tina and Jerry Cullers Mr. and Mrs. James Scott 1020 North 28th Place 2506 Meadow Avenue North 1405 North 28th Renton,WA 98056-2173 Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Manfred and Anne Hansen Dean and Cynthia Schumacher Nancy Stark 1221 North 26th Street 1116 North 28th Place Mark Mykel Renton, WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 1409 North 26th Street Renton, WA 98056 Dean H. Schellert Donald and Patricia Rosburg M.L. Gibson 1013 North 28th Place 1402 North 26th Street 1215 North 28th Place Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Barbara Smith Robert and Esther Miller Rich Wagner 1308 North 26th Street 1121 North 28th Place Baylis Brand Wagner Architects Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 19801 Main Street Bellevue,WA 98004 LaVerne and Mary Jo Graves Steve and Julie Wasson Marlene Mandt 905 North 28th Place 2515 Park Place North 1408 North 26th Street Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Patrick McDonald Barry Oman Glyn Gardner 160 Vashon Place NE Friends of Youth 2100 Lake Washington Blvd#84 Renton,WA 98059 2500 Lake Washington Blvd North Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98056 Song Qyao 1412 North 26th St Renton,WA 98056 set -t tiSY O Land Use/Zoning: dial-Multi-Family•!nil!'(RM.-I).The proposal Is generally consistent U r(y ..,,..,,,o policies of the RM-1 designation of the Comprehensive Plan and the A development standards of the RM-1 Zone.Permitted residential densities are a • .a . minimum of 10 dwelling units per acre(net)and a maximum of 20 dwelling units per acre.The proposal would result in densities of approximately 20 dwelling �- Nrf,0 unds per acre. Density:** Approximately 20 dwelling units per acre(after sensitive areas are deducted REVISED** from the gross site area) NOTICE OF APPLICATION Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Report,Technical Analysis,Traffic Study AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF Development Regulations NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's SEPA(environmental)Ordinance,Zoning Code,Land Clearing and Tree Cutting regulations,Parking and Loading standards,Shoreline Master Program,Site Plan Review standards,Public Works standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,King County Surface Water Drainage Manual,etc.These adopted codes and standards will DATE: Revised September 14,1998 function to mitigate project Impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures: LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-96-123,SA-H,V-H,SM,ECF The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. APPLICATION NAME: Tameron Pointe Apartments PROJECT DESCRIPTION: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the 1. Traffic Mitigation equivalent to$75 for each new aversweekdaytrip development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17M gati(Credit Fee: q average attributed to the three-story buildings with 182 apartment units,a one-story recreation center,and parking proposal. y ba given for the trips that current site development generates.) for 372 vehicles Is proposed. Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of grading(coVfilt) 2. Fire Mitigation Fee:a permulti-family ( may would occur on site as a result of project construction. 9equivalent to$388 each new residential unit. Credit be given for the current site development) The site Is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing slrudures and mobile homes would be removed. 3. Parks Mitigation Fee:equivalent to$354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit created. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents (Credit may be given for existing residential development on the site.) that could be affected by the proposal. 4. Geotechnical Recommendations:follow recommendations of the geolechnical engineer for the The project requires Environmental Review,Site Plan Approval,Variance from Lend construction of site infrastructure and building foundations. Clearingand Tree Cutting Ordinance in order to clear and grade steep slope areas adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard North, and a Shoreline Substantial Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Ma Development Permit,as a portion of the site is located within 200(eel of Lake Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 13,1998. This Washington.The applicant Is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading matter Is also scheduled for a public hearing on October 27,1998,.at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Ordinance in Order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton. If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division,(425)430-7282,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments PROJECT LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED IONS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. a party of record and receive additional Information by mail,contact Ms.Henning at(425)430-7286. Anyone who Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project notice that a ONS•M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are Integrated into a single comment period.There wilt be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of CONTACT PERSON: Jennifer Toth Henning(425)430-7288 Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 11,1998 74 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Revised September 14,1999 w `a a' nv�.', ":? PermitslRev'rew Requested: Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval,Environmental Review,Variance from .p $ - ,A y ., Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance,Shoreline Substantial Development • ..\c-- ' ,T A ^ A t Permit.Project will require construction and building permits to be applied for at 'h t_• oq ,q r a later time. \'' 1F;hB +,;t,,.1 . Other Permits which maybe required: Hydraulic Permit Application(Stale of Washington) )O r d'°1 r�1 \eti . .21�t Requested Studies: Traffic Impact Analysis,Geolechnial Engineering study,Technical Information y 1�t o, I P ,,I„�v�'� !•l a Report(Slormwater analysis) -1 [�, r 'j' y 1 - li• 1 I '.. eq Location where application my o 1-la p�`' '' be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, hu `�T�. ygg,, 1055 South Grady Way-6th Floor,Renton,WA 98056 tO� • r m i _,'4,* I::_.'i _ • PUBLIC HEARING: Yes.A public hearing Is scheduled for Tuesday,October 27,1998,9:00 a.m.in Im� !ll���,a,' �_I .`` ,p 111'• the City Council Chambers,7th goon Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way, • 1+ :� Yt with the City of Renlan's Hearing Examiner. I I tJ lS'to J�,frO, • I_ iti. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: i fi ^ ,A�I ,g Analytical process J'a y'' _ 1 v- r.(, w.uor.lxx � °7d '�ce CERTIFICArT'ION I, \It'iiii( '�-MnI12 , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places of or nearby the described property on i', {i�f 6 i e +`i ' ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary,Pub •' ,in r the State of seAAAlt Washington residing in( to � , on the 5 #i day of eh_, - /55e • .--722oL}2 ✓ '1)-a --11.-e-4 . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 0rcY 0 ♦ 1R4 •'Nrc **REVISED** NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: Revised September 14,1998 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-123,SA-H,V-H,SM,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments PROJECT DESCRIPTION: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center,and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of grading (cut/fill) would occur on site as a result of project construction. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, Variance from Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance in order to clear and grade steep slope areas adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard North, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. PROJECT LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 11,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Revised September 14,1998 Permits/Review Requested: Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval,Environmental Review,Variance from Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance,Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Project will require construction and building permits to be applied for at a later time. Other Permits which may be required: Hydraulic Permit Application(State of Washington) Requested Studies: Traffic Impact Analysis,Geotechnical Engineering study,Technical Information Report(Stormwater analysis) Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way--6th Floor,Renton,WA 98058 PUBLIC HEARING: Yes. A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday,October 27,1998,9:00 a.m.in the City Council Chambers,7th floor Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way, with the City of Renton's Hearing Examiner. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process GENMLOT.DOC Land Use/Zoning: Residential-Multi-Family-Infill(RM:I). The proposal is generally consistent with the policies of the RM.-I designation of the Comprehensive Plan and the development standards of the RM:I Zone. Permitted residential densities are a minimum of 10,dwelling units per acre(net)and a maximum of 20 dwelling units per acre. The proposal would result in densities of approximately 20 dwelling units per acre. Density: Approximately 20 dwelling units per acre(after sensitive areas are deducted from the gross site area) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Report,Technical Analysis,Traffic Study Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's SEPA(environmental)Ordinance,Zoning Code,Land Clearing and Tree Cutting regulations,Parking and Loading standards,Shoreline Master Program,Site Plan Review standards,Public Works standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,King County Surface Water Drainage Manual,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Traffic Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$75 for each new average weekday trip attributed to the proposal. (Credit may be given for the trips that current site development generates.) 2. Fire Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$388 per each new multi-family residential unit. (Credit may be given for the current site development.) 3. Parks Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit created. (Credit may be given for existing residential development on the site.) 4. Geotechnical Recommendations: follow recommendations of the geotechnical engineer for the construction of site infrastructure and building foundations. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on October 13, 1998. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on October 27, 1998,.at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, contact Ms. Henning at (425) 430-7286. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jennifer Toth Henning(425)430-7286 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ";.L�'�'�.—i,-'IF''. r --�'a ] 1 - ,V I .. sd a%iaw6�Qnc Lka u -0 'o "1 -I- F'iv-•1 ail ' y mm D.7i V.' i,G_I +` ,\, P os • '� u'�. � 1op a'aL F�� ` 6p '1 _ cv it I'a . i 'Z 4v4., • ti �7�r ti -1ry7' I Z 11 7-'4, Oa\itiW 0'. 4, ,1/4- •. ,s.,it, sl$ eea c r I,a? >`i' '�id ,:e. I r `a i a _ F 4 '1?h,i'‘ ,:'..'-,.,0it i'qt 1�� 99FF 1 11 1�� C . PCN6A1(1T Ilfl(: _. ..-..; •' . i- -..^ .a"...• ._G:_.0. .' ' September 2, 1998 tIEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON SEP 15 1998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning RECEIVED City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Name: >bcv 4 Q 04' Address: /4412 A). 217(-1 , 14-Mi 9roff cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033" 7�� ,� ,,/� . a114! , v vZ) Z econ a worry 4 Guiltier st W& 11�4e ��/�" 71' �,e�6 ti. ' G ire po /j cciw -e. o��r'ao7,B, ei a exo �l _ . lie & � �� ev/14-4- brio' ieuvectuotty 4z 4,A Alf‘itiv. zevi pffaVO4, ��, N. 28th St. /.//.////c //////// ////// ////// / / /////////// N. 26th St. t..._ w N.E. 24th St. d� N. 24th St m o O- N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON TO Park Entrance —110- y. w z N.E. 16th St. m ai < a T C a N U GENE COULON N.E.14th St. < MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance r--.4/C\ li _ • ----� VP a Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map I September 8, 1998 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Ms.Jennifer Toth Henning SEP 11 1998 City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No.,LUA-98-123,SA-H, SM,ECF Dear Ms.Jennifer: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartment development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park,or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhoods. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles,low intensity light bulbs,and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations,lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian,Dog Exercise and Bicycle Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrians,pedestrians walking their dog,and bicycle frequented by local residences and visitor alike. Every effort should be made to preserve this trail system as a desirable site for Renton and King County. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development,in addition to Tramon Pointe,is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: • Labrador Venture 66 single family homes • The Bluffs 165 residential units • Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd. will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd.will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriated improvements. At the very minimum,the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditional on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City(expected this Fall). • Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that"...the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited(page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible development described above raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusion. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture,Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments,and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to the City code,the applicant is required to erect a 4'x 8 ` sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. On either Lake Washington Blvd.or 26th St.. If it has been erected,please request that it be placed in a site that is visible from Lake Washington and 26t. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Marleen Kay Mandt 1408 N 26th St Renton,WA.,98056 cc: ' Mr.John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,NE,#330 Kirkland,WA.,98033 v WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources JENNIFER M.BELCHER Commissioner of Public Lands DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DATE: September 1, 1998 SEP 01 1998 RECEIVED TO: Jennifer T Henning City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way - 6th Floor Renton, WA 98058 FROM: David John Weiss Resource Protection Specialist South Puget Sound Region SUBJECT REVIEW OF: Tamaron Pointe Apt LUA98-123 , SA-H, SM,ECF ACTION SPONSOR: Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT: Timber Harvest/Land Conversion [] We do not have an interest in the above project and have no comments on the proposal . [X] We do have an interest in the above project and wish to make the following comments: A *forest practices permit will be required for the harvest of timber associated with this project. cc: Dave Dietzman - SEPA Center - DNR SEPA#: 014208 SOUTH PUGET SOUND REGION 1950 FARMAN ST N I PO BOX 68 I ENUMCLAW, WA 98022-0068 FAX:(360)825-1672 I TTY:(360)825-6381 I TEL:(360)825-1631 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer RECYCLED PAPER 0 WATFWashingtonState Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 7DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DATE: June 8, 1998 CITY OF RENTON C. SEP 01 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager Development Services Division RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: SR-900 MP 5.00 CS 1743 . /<//:'1.\..1--L...-t..--,--.----' Tam:LooncPaol inte Apartments FileUA-98-123, SA-H,SM,ECF �',I) FRO obert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North,MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 . Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, our response is checked below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. X The State requests that a traffic study be prepared to analyze the impact of the project's generated peak hour trips on State Highways and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions,please contact John Sutherland, (206)440-4914, or Don Hurter, (206)440-4664 of my Developer Services section. JBS:js lstrspns.doc elILA **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9805533 Amount : 11 . 52 09/11/98 09 : 38 Payment Method: CASH Notation: TRAMMEL CROW Init : LMN Project # : LUA98-123 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 229650-0200 Site Address : 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BL N Total Fees : 3 , 288 . 08 This Payment 11 . 52 Total ALL Pmts : 3 , 288 . 08 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 11 . 52 II1 (:IiI _E John H.Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL Development Associate West Coast Group 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland,WA 98033-7866 (425)828-3003 FAX(425)828-0904 September 4, 1998 Ms. Jennifer Henning Project Manager City of Redmond 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123 Dear Jennifer: Attached, please find the necessary information for a variance request to excavate unsuitable fill material from certain steep slopes on the proposed development site. This variance request is intended to amend the current application with the City of Renton,Project No. LUA-98-123. Sincerely, I ✓U r Joh Wayland F:\TAMARON\henni ng.l et Project: TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS Project No.: LUA-98-123 RE: VARIANCE REQUEST 18a. Granting of this variance is necessary because of exceptional and extraordinary circumstances related to the size,shape,topography,and location of the subject property as follows: Exceptional circumstances have been placed on the property due to the fact that the property contains steep sloped areas that were created by the previous development of the site as a mobile home park. Slopes to the easterly part of the site were cut and this material was placed on the West Side of the site as fill. According to the Geotechnical Engineering Study, prepared by Geotech Consultants, dated June 18, 1998, this fill material contains organic material and has shown signs of movement and settlement,and is unsuitable for new construction, including code required street improvements. The slope area between the North and South driveways currently shows signs of soil sliding down the slope onto Lake Washington Blvd. 18b. Granting of this variance will not be materially detrimental to the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole for the following reason: Excavation and replacement of the unsuitable , existing fill will correct the slide and erosion problems that currently exist on the site. City codes require that any new development on the site will need to include the installation of street improvements(ie. curb, gutter, and sidewalk). This will be a benefit therefore, rather than a detriment. 18c. The variance will only grant the subject property the same general rights enjoyed be other in the same area and zone as the subject property for the following reason: The variance is intended to mitigate serious problems related to pre-existing conditions that were created by previous development. The variance will allow the applicant to develop the site as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning assigned to the site,while also installing code required improvements. 18d. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the general rights discussed above for the following reason: The variance affects only the areas that are man-made steep slopes created by previous development, which need to be mitigated. All natural steep slope areas will remain undisturbed. The excavation of the unsuitable fill is considered the minimum action necessary to develop the site because any development would require the installation of street improvements and correcting the slide problem onto Lake Washington Blvd. • � � ,`sy_�'�! _ ny,a c. .a.vim, ri � .r . '1, ' I / �4o� rzyd - ^ no ris''_ry�r� I ^ .r ar.V �1 ,S n .ramn s .r,o V y.a,ry r 1 ' Li"' - ;i :/' "" -''Y -'-..-'''.-'''' ''''- 16111111MIE AU5W1-''','Agi' ' ' ' ' . - ''''- : i - - `''' . '' . - ' 1 ' / --` i i ■'- ^ e NUJ- b/1�1ANNUM _/�_ - _ N1M 7L F —_— ViNXI1A "•-;rlir -may=- __ J � �� ii ��� _� �_ ��—cam_ _c 't !C r> �� ' •..........____ _______............,..... I■ if i� ■. la a �� • _�� --•i_ `_ _-:` a�� �- ) 1 lii, • rigMieltili Ct _ • ir . _ lit\ ' Thra ir I iii,L,.. :. s . �� ii ,T—nce,...-..� a "`T �'1• mot- . OW Ith-rom ■ _ ■■Os irtsporst •••i ■ .•�■ m YICY► '%� �� ii• ••i�i � II :r•i Ir.iA��•i. �4ii �a�ii 7..:-• I lI�� ■E �faA��. ILIiA •i` 111 Mil ...P.111111ikailt,.......... . ._ 4is... ii tee till San :g ILI 1!......dis.brr_____________--------,� /, . CAA=1�=1�'.•►A��' • ,----, _ *! •040‘,'-...,-,r. lillf Air WiliG -4 ..' :.- -411Flil -- wllm ,- ..... I:1 it slif - , ifit-.=:Atai „rillgairal - raliarwiaitimitak . o. r, . \_,.........:::,..47 - --,_- -11.4- &- ,.:, t...*: e*.x " 11 iip C7A .1ft__ • . _. ,,, F wt.,,,,,,....isa 3i I I' 1.,,,,0 4 Oplpyfi*...mild: :.,, ' t G � � � i ' � ^ • Pam'----1 .. I z-. 1 r�-�- 1r -- R-s io.r ♦•G7 - ce•q� L I o» . .oo..,..,- r Rwr ••J I / _ 0 I L. -,ram r- i I / -.. _ _ ,.0 .Lq��. 1 ,may , �► Ifi C YY a., , w ar y 0'",o ��8t` rttirS It it4 r�' , ` s • gA . . . 4,0WARIIPII,--1PT‘ --I-4..:',,i0.----;;iirevrtwt gior* Aii,„ g emk ,.. v. . ..frik--10,...e....10.. . ...., ;co 4, g, %,ate*.:,---,1,. :---- c....;;-..-_-14., Agit MP*. . 'Altatte l'inlr'..-A'n-T11"-- 3, ..0.00\01V.,*.,:4,t74>o,..:".,,,.... . - 'ie.. ---------...-- litill*,, ,,,--_, ,,..0 . .• -"tVatier.klfiria„--Pg1,,-.----- -401011 101., illigi0."- ----‘11"'", ,.i.k.ri..,-- r .„. . .,,,.. . ,• ....* ...... ., .... ..... _.....„--. . ,i, . ..... ,. ./..,. , ., ,....... ,, ., ..... ., . ,.... �,. twl _ .•AiM. • j y 1`" '-..'o,__T-.„A,,. Yam, - i iU... '.`" 11 0:,.0.„.„...-.0„-00-1-.0„-..-toriAks-.-.. [ 1 PARKIN6 DATA ♦ Al% 0 �1�'�I//" ..rxMOPowroeD �, �li;�s��� it Variance Request: =LANDSCAPE DATA FCG4LAR 512 R-1 z... ,� c`-�� .: / INTERIOR PAPoCMG: ]lito a. iJCl4. 0 !O.� .smell! e AR STEEP SLOPE VARIANCE REQUEST INCLUDES n AREAS E AND F. STEEP SLOPE cNG.SPACE 6]6]6.r. Ore+ I �" NC,.. oTI.eQ LANDSCAPE AREA. 1n5e1.l. TOTAL.Fl4 325 \, TC'�_AV^SCAPE'CFEN SPACE 7385:3 et C.XPACT r Q.1NJ 4' s� SITE PLAN PAfa< LANDSCAPE pAl" .- _.�< Asa Er57 SCALE I-.S^ • . IT® PAR051E 09 PARK/NO LAND 0.1•3121640.t. v MTEPoOR AND D ti aiwr, APING:31 4t. M!7♦1 BUILDING MATRIX UNIT MATRIX ...,w.wJ . .,• .-• OL170 TYPE•..--.I.i FL 71.1 Fi 3.o R rl oTsL*woo. BLDG TTPE-]•D-I]•C-I 8OC-I e50 B10 -CO Ce TOTAL El SITE PLAN DATA I E 3060 6030 5520 .646 7.467 I E 0 2 0 2 D 1100 4860 A422 10007 3660 2 D 6 2 • 3 C 7400 4060 4,422 11,110 1110.7 3 C - 6 2 • LOT CCNRRAC£DATA. • 4 E 410 3690 33* 1616 2150 4 D 4 2 6 •ITE AIiE6 465056.l. 5 E 3060 6030 552014646 2.462 5 C - 6 7 0 6 D 800 4560 4477 10067 3660 6 0 6 2 0 DAWNS AREA'CROWD FEDORA 53116 J. / 1 C 7,4.0 4560 4,422 11,110 1,557 1 C 6 2 • .OT CQ2RA(.E, :,.2., ..I1..314.355J . BLDG.COVERAGE MATRIX • A 5541 1106 IIDOJ n007 30101 e A 4 NO 4 Ze r1PER.Iae SUQACE DATA. .p•641g.Fiw.L.-.of ew•. TOTAL 0 C 4.3 00 4060 4.422II,TO 1.557 5 E 0 7 10 / T - IO D 8 4.60 I42.'2 10007 3660 a D 6 2 • 0/101.01+9 FoornlMr: ]5116.l. A WOW. 7 wan 7216.4f. n C 3, 0 5 C • 2 • PATIO6.NDW.K6: 14,C0.J. 4 4.477 II1T0 Ira •'4 C )400.r. I Md1 3.40Cs f Q E 3086 088 6 C30 5570 1464.6 7,46. Q ! 0 2 10- DPoVEW4.T5.PARCNG. 1[7.151 J. C 4400.1 T Mai 3136061 I3 C 7400 4060 4422 11,110 1,557 13 C _ 6 2 0 D 4460.1. 3 Md. 13300..f. 14 IOW 5541 n 80e7 8667 3016T _IA ♦ IAIp 4 76 TOTAL _ E 555C.r. 3•.m 1665i7.1 5 C 2.66 4060 4422 11.110 1,152 A C 6 7 0 . !4.1♦) l % lu..bl•J _• 3532.1. 1 Mrn 5533..t 3i F 550 6060 5020 Q560 4542 16 F • ' 2 10 6-.3. 155011 toad, 755041 11 C i ,Q_447) 3110 15Y A D 6 2 , 0 345 r^1-5 FiC15✓=Jo. I•A 036af _-'' 550 }--- ITOi:y 30 20 0` 66 30 20 10 i•t T=.g_ )4-'.I 3•.•*-0 ...Ipif. TCT.'y 11002 I - 15433TI544:. IS1;•.'�s^3,4'Ls!$__ib J T1EE 3TAAD^IG G_RAGE_ r3_•.aN .A....1' �_ .... _,--:--,-t!--_-:::---,,..=,....-----,:::-.1.-..:-.....;11 '-a,--,Z7., _ ----------- --" "' .II ? ( \ 4 4 .... ) 1 \ ,,,,v-ir,-,460, .:,reir i 44 9,42 4000 .0 CAL' .... %� -,p:1 � 4 f ✓/ /i 4000 �' 04 �� 4— SteepSlope Area - Density Calculations . •� l i ' v I °'�•`o"` AREA A.0.12A TOTAL SITE AREA:10.69A ..� --' y i �? 4 _- liorj'�� AREA B:0.72A STEEP SLOPE AREA.1.55A !t i 1 _ ' % Variance Request: AREA C:0.04A NETDEV.AREA:9.14A �* p \�� `\` i STEEP SLOPE VARIANCE REQUEST INCLUDES AREA D:OABA X 20DU/ACRE ' f r -r,; AREAS E AND F. VGA E70.�IA 182.8 DU allowed(182) c 7 �..- (AREA F:0.42A �/ / TOTAL AREA:I.SSA %//ii�' � / !VARIANCE REQUEST AREA:0.62A I - '✓ AN APARTMENT COMMUNRY FOR ..........."""" TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL rma ski TAMARON POINTE ..... ..u.m..P•No `'� . rcr.COr. tl'/T HNGTOI' ... ... nn°` .♦ V V' J V 1 l L: 1•J •J V L'.^...1 •J V V•J.J J 1 V 1 V L.:1[\1 US.:1 L'_ or --i latiCaN Earthcalc, Inc. 270 Lund Road (360) 533-2007 �+ ^�'�{ 'f7t Cosmopolis, WA 98537 FAX: (360) 533-1618 / -----.. --":_.„..-'''''' INTERNET: http://www.techline.comI--•earthcic September 8, 1998 Earthcalc Job#6625 Darrin Sanford Pacific Engineering 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Tamaron Pointe Dear Darrin, Enclosed please find grid elevation cutlfill graphics and volumes for this project, which was calculated using the average end area method and the following assumptions: 1. A stripping depth of 6" was applied to the existing terrain. 2. A depth of 41"from design elevations to subgrade in the landscapes. 3. A depth of 6" from design elevations to subgrade in the paving. 4. A depth of 8" from finish floor elevations to subgrade in the buildings. TOTAL RAW VOLUMES IN PLACE (Volumes are in Cubic Yards) Region _ Area ((2) Cut Volume Fill Volume Stripping Volume Overexcavation 160,517 43,899 0 2,973 OverEx to Design(including Backfill) 406,113 24,564 36,085 4,548 Please call after you have reviewed this information if you have any questions. * Raw volumes are calculated after existing terrain has been stripped, thus creating less cut and more fill of suitable material. Raw volumes have not been adjusted to reflect shrink or swell for compaction and expansion and are volumetric areas only. X .. _:------2-----------=—___ \ ----.---__, --------- . ---------------- -"---""- -------" ----- /----------./7Z1 ------------.-____:.-,...- -- ---.----'' --------:'"-----------------"--------- _____Th......„.....„....................... ... .--.___________ - -----_-•--__ _ ----------=- ------13(7----------- ,,„------...___--------_:_--------_ --- - \r..... Spirianisiermisimb, --- visr------___C )=------------- 2...-"IIIIW ir --..."."1" ."•.. ... -_,:.---------.z.--_____---: :,-------z--_------ ___-----i_-----------\\_.,___ - ----:i.4-- _,. ,---- ----- ---_---T----- -7------------ - ------------------_-2s •, \ cs...-ZO Ili voi . k -1-eR al" i P141111111111111401444k AtiltAl::._% '" • .....-;------------' c10- °B30 10o 0 FF / in ma A 441111%fir' •-______ jilli-HvOlior i:------------- ----7"---- --, ....F A 0; k.) ma tr,6 00 : "MI Eco 6,0 1111\p. ii ....., ,,,,. _____ • .., iter‘ —_________ 1111111114111111111111111448 NIP I V 61111°‘111174$ IN• IN Cio • --1F.- MB II • ‹. .:: OD al i 410. • 1-1 \ kik- P • : , ihrralli 14 'Noisimporalaidniniull1111100.10.1.11111111111° '. Ippht :: 4114117 "041111.0--,...,,A i. 41. - 47/04 0 FF 1 .0 V •17°- ,; 4.104 1- . a 1,111.11,1461 -11.41111all NN• 3,UNIT .S,WIET D-4 met: -1 , • a 0 4, a, .1 to uNILD-4 .. 1;pH Tiriie FF -m a FF II•W*5-21 " F . min ill 071411 al 4 ' F\4\UU:rrC-C-11 / 4 UtitT c,, 3 • :1;1: nitimisir ._ Vifiliftt ill74"* 790: i i —-- IIII _ it1 *W .--= . ....„ ...,_ ,---g-0.101 c. 9 0 . •----1 1"..m. 444%„,410;IRIS 11111 --f-:114.1 : 111 -:-: ' ■ amp.... ,,,* a o45, •• SI Oil 111711 allaill likft".9.4' a co Essommumisillikre 1 1 , 110-------0i 013 lb ____ „._-. , , a .,____ a !sea/ ..,./ lit* vir •...., siglignip III E.:.-_;_-. • *Lgillmb, in .. \ N - 7,47 .ft II. 8. • . 111111111111111111 riltiliftill 4%1IIIIIiiiiMi il . ki-dig itaiiiiiiiiatai -SS: k‘t . 1 " T ::; dalli_ 1 WilialMillMallb.. .• -mar.grimiamism• e..........nim; .4A11111 illi WWI* vaillial 1 -- i Atanamminivrmiz... _ i_....--../. MN Willielip -P.1.4 -4111151141111111111 ii"I";114.14ll""IIIIIMIIIIIMMIIIImftllIll""Milliftr.: IT • gliiiiiiw.-' - ____rait___751 ".II ' mitril:l :.:t:::!::!lnu•F:82::mmr eillirlIalirif b*el 1: .• 1'" • "if\ - al - 1111= la F I RS ill a' me a hi wrAra, ir ,1.(i-e------------'1--:,:'_1."-_1-1-1i--Im,I-.1&ln.1,am1:101:.9s0:;9wha L 0.&r'4la1.b01za11_W_1W•1r-1AIc• .•11I Ii1TaA.M&-..9..-II3N.2..k.A...,r E......Ir:"•u ;4=1a1.:..1. I_t".•z"liR•i•i•rljl IaWl -ii-.-. •s r-.0 m.,_-- o-41u11jm111pd 11D.;1911a101.1 11.-i-i*-i I-_I-_-• 1_N___1N_1__•___F F 1 on .i i 15 6 . = . l/m 1 8FFI llii I1M U1/1M 111fi1;n o I1•I‘3r111N11I 1 ts..‘.a.---m--,-ar1..'•2,%-1t'.Vv _e,.1.t2.i.nai.-inwsia.afin_rs..Ioelar usasase Nrre _! " M• tYoft, *at raMi IMgcaiBoI No•,."I0_I n V.A.°A...IaII 715158F:)1 411-.O•0 EWei-1o1 Lma--- 0El-1e1k1tg.F o1..1o'L \=\UA E gj lioitl t a'- 1 Ami eia. . - ..-!'f- iNamorivi--.7• -""..a.. •---___:::____- __ _______ . ,,-- . ... . .................riirlinil -*"„.----.00110 .m..... JIIIIIMIIftNa.IIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIrAIIImoa,„- ..a ----:- ---"----' "-----Z. — ----1--L--- -----:------ _,-------- aggllEZFSTL.-...izrzvssm: tit..._--m*q2twaii.i. . - a -_-------- -- • - ' Es)211" 2" „____________ _ —..mmia....._ --....mwp.• motv.m....-----___. Awfia!" i26;11011-158551°'_ -......2.30basgaMtatttit7MaAk..:....--: ----------- '-----______-..... Immommommimmimmigame ------in_ ,..... :-.---r. - ___-- — io,, __ -, „..,.. ,lir.,,,-:•-_:: < . f,,•1:r :,•,_,,._;e:-,S,,-..:, , .-,_. .-7---ii . __Wi . _ 1111.111111111 ..'A- V-V5'-Pii.Ri7.?e ';': ..,';.:W-,.;.-- ,,,.i:i. :.,Q, ,„i., ,w -ei`ttiVmi.s'1,0,,,ps• z:.- _. ...,,,,-- "--1 2',..';'.:.:' ',-..ii-.:.::..:... ,-;--- .,•,..z ,,;.-." - t,-;7'.,;',: f,%-:,:.:::::;:.1:;;:,;::::''i;,...,-s.4.-:':'‘ ''.,'...:',..‘. r.'"'-'-rfr'''.'''''''''""'-''''''''' ''''''''''':.:"ti:-.F.;Z:;; Iinu4ii*st,;:l.Z..- -t*440:. =1:1e6-::441 iff-:ANNWK.;,,, ,,,,..,1,„,:.• WAIdi-iiNGTONr BOUILEV: , . . ..,,:,41,,,,:,.,,.:tr,... ,„,:;,,,,,,,,,... .!,,,,,,,....,,,::,.-;„.. , ,,,r--.--.,,,, ..-,.. ..,,,,•7,:.,.;.-., ,,z,.,,-4:, ..-,, ,,,,,c, -:.,i,-,,,a-,;f,..4-,,,,;.,?.,,,, , -..., . , , -, ,,..,::. ,: , " :-'.',"1%.,.:;:z.1:-y,,:,,;r,,.,,,,,i,,,,•-,,,Ri, ,. . . . . , • . .t ••_ 1 V+•1• . . ". .. '• •''''''' "*....- i'...''''.''''-'‘e. ,t,4'..i7,:•'. ff,i‘i: :IY,',V,,Aq!.jA.:.,.! ;:tlf ::',:•1, -r.4'' .4'.;*.)b%%,c3.-' f2='e:':fir AtiV!,,,:l.:,7,, 1-.- - • . . . . - le.,,,,.•.7fXr.:,:,-.;,•i,,k::•:.‘.4.e,-,t.Dt':';,-:. ::'7rf,:•:t.,.5.,r3",' ..:;•wt,'::::- •.s'rf;14.50, 7i:::' iii;*::-,`A7W":'-''':;:.7-':" .1% .•..5".", ...." 4,- 0, . 4/e;,,z, ..C`,, /e-'''"‘'', I se-A, ck 617/9F -...s.,, -e- 1V>.li. E5 •r0f, •0 0/.., i I cs- , .? A IP, .4.• -• 49... ,..... --6-j. :-.co• 111._. 5-61 `-'`if,'1•••,_ .1' -Rep• is-.... -te• 11/Z1/ : : 'WIL• DING 13 9tilL.�INQ 18... . 1 190• • . . : • • . : . . . . : : . . • •.-, -- -.F... 96 • • . V 1 EXISTING.•GRADE • N., PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE .80 - 1 i,�2• N ELEVATION 80 : Y:A . . . ESTIMATED 'PRE=FILL 'GRADE s-5.. -70 : OrTIV-i‘ . . .4. ..N . : 70 • FILL PLACED FOR MOBILE BORING #11 HOME PARK <10' 'OF MO•. ie\_/ - 1.**‘\' '.. : .. eQ . :: • . 6C) - . FILL PLACED- FOR MOBILE [.AKE WAS INGTON .13LVQ. HOME PARK CROSS".. -$EQT1ON A"'- "A SCALE: '1=10'':'VERT -i -N20'.' HORZ. 8/29/..98..FACIFIC ENGINEERING...DE.SIGN,....INC, i 4 . _ • • 1P._ BIHLDING 7 BUILDING 8 • PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE 100 • ELEVATION / -__..) ir 90 80 80 1 1/2 /%.. • IlkESTIMATED PRE-FILL GRADE • • \_. .. BORING #10 60 (15' 0 TILL) LAKE WASHINGTON ELVD. - FILL•-PLACED FOR MOBILE HOME- PARK CROSS.. - SECTION B - B SCALE: 1n=10' 'VERT. 1=20' HORZ. 8/29/98 PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN, INC. DEVELOPMENT Pi AWNG CITY OF RENTON Steve & Julie Wasson SEP 0 9 1998 2515 Park Place North Renton, WA 98056 RECEIVED (425) 228-6787 jwasson206@aol.corn September 4, 1998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton, Building/Public Works Dept. 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Tamaron Pointe Apartments, Project LUA-98-123, SA-H, Sivi, ECE Dear Ms Toth Henning: We are concerned that the development of the Tamaron Pointe Apartments has the potential to seriously and negatively affect the character and livability of the Kennydale community, if the city does not carefully control this project and require adequate planning. The following is a review of our areas of concern. Grading, Height Limitations and View Impacts The planned site grading and building heights may be out of character with neighborhoods and impact views of existing residents. The application for the Tamaron Pointe development refers to 'up to 10,000 yards of fill'. This dramatic regrading of the site, combined with anticipated building heights, has the potential to raise ultimate building heights to a level that would be unattractive and out of character with surrounding developments while impacting views of other residents. The city J VU IU limit the L. VCIUJ . 0 t to three stories UI 35' above the present grade, and not allow off-site fill material to raise the ultimate elevation of these structures. Geological Impacts The hillsides behind the planned development (between Park Place N. and the development, and between Garden Ave N. and the development) have a history of problems with instability and erosion that could be aggravated by the planned development. The city should require a study of the geological impacts and approval of a mitigation plan. Security Impacts This development will create a concentrated population of new residents that is likely to result in security issues for the surrounding Kennydale homeowners. Measures should be taken to discourage pedestrian shortcuts through our properties to reach the Tamaron Pointe Apartments. The city should require an 8' high, chain-link or solid wood fence along the North, East, and South property lines, subject to normal setbacks from the street, and require that these barriers be kept in good repair. Traffic Impacts and Vehicle Safety The cumulative traffic impacts of multiple developments in Kennydale must be considered together. The Tamaron Pointe, Labrador Venture, The Bluffs, the Barbee Mill % PanAbode sites, and the site adjacent to Marina Landing are aii likely to be developed within the next three years. Failure to consider the combined impact will leave the city burdened with the expense to resolve the resulting problems on its own, without support from the contributing developers. The city should require the traffic analysis to be reworked to at least incorporate traffic anticipated from Tamaron Pointe and Labrador Ventures. In addition the study should not be accepted until it recognizes that the number of households will roughly double at Tameron Pointe, the number of cars per household will also double, and the number of trips per car will increase sharply as a result of this development. The current population is mostly older, retired people. The planned population is expected to be mostly young and active. This extra traffic will require installation of traffic signals on Lake Washington Blvd. at two intersections where there are currently all-way stops: at N. 36th St., and near N. 28th St. (at both ends of Burnett Ave N.). The cost of this should be borne by the developers, not the city. The Tameron Pointe developer should install left turn lanes on Lake Washington Blvd. at each entrance to the site. Pedestrian Safety There is a high level of pedestrian and bicycle traffic along Lake Washington Blvd. as part of a network of trails and in conjunction with Gene Coulon Park. The development of this site should not be allowed to interfere with this and should, in fact, enhance these resources. The city should require a concrete curb and sidewalk along the west edge of the site, along Lake Washington Blvd., connecting to the similar curb and sidewalk that was required for Marina Landing Apartments. The current bicycle lanes should be preserved in this design. Lighting Exterior lighting of this development should not be allowed to impact the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront, Gene Coulon Park or surrounding properties. The city should forbid exterior uplighting and unnecessary architectural lighting, limit the height of lighting poles, and require strategic, low intensity solutions wherever possible. In summary, we recognize that Kennydale IS changing and that the owners of the property have a right to develop their land. Our goal is to help the city and the developer anticipate and mitigate problems that -- without careful planning -- might unnecessarily impact the city and existing residents. Please include us as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, C 9 Steve & Julie Wasson cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 09/09/98 15 :44 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9805496 Amount : 250 . 00 09/09/98 15 :43 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #2037 TCR Init : LMN Project # : LUA98-123 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 229650-0200 Site Address : 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BL N Total Fees : 3 , 276 . 56 This Payment 250 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 3 , 276 . 56 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 o © CITY OF RENTON 0,A' l e i!i'0 ...*r ..� Planning/Building/Public Works a —�1� ; 9, 5 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 Va I-0 " AUQ 2 6'8 8. . i.•S 1 ` 0 ,2 9 S w coii ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Occ 5 16 fit F3E dr13T kA Tvs-rtiJ* 1. Timoteo Alviz w 1309 N 28th St. Renton, WA 98056 RE TURN ( •C.-1)-1' TOV, RIT�_R ' I J ADDRESSEE , j r' ...c.a.e,T.:1.,r--,2:71./7e- Itslsslsslsllm„1s1ss1s1sssiissslsissil,ss{sLlslsslsi,ssllsl • 7erne E. Graves 9UJ N. 28th P1. Renton, WA 98056-2176 September 2, 1998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning DEVELOPMENT PLANNING City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department CITY OF RENTON Project Manager SEP 0 1998 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 RECEIVED SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, 7/14i, Name: La Verne E. Graves Mary Jo Graves Address: 905 N. 28th P1. 905 North 28th Place Renton,WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 N. 28th St. ///////c i,///,,,,,,,t/ ///// ,/ / /////////// N. 26th St. W N.E. 24th St. Z N.24th St m co Q o ,t, ...:0'•::::. v) O- N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON 0 Park •:::• . Entrance --► y. w z z N.E. 16th St. 6 6Q < C a a)N GENE COULON N.E.14th St. Q MEMORIAL BEACH PARKdile Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance ti 1 IC.............. Qc a � •Q Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map 71"1499-7% lD56. eANt",iiriL Nc��l Ni -rt�� Ordadt A62 ,L,IN. .1eN1 .0AA er„ e2s -gam -ai4N116981 %kg-z,S>'91\i`Pc& �rvi6yN� �1QL Zlr�k�.�(� ' 1'1 4 #)0250 ��� Nt1>1W tool September 2, 1998 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning CITY OF RENTON City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department SEP d 8 1998 Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way �^ Renton, Washington 98055 RE SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Name: obi=d q Es >�fcR mt lltfZ •��/GGl - Address: ( � a i N , w ,PN Mr.&Mrs.R.A.Miller ,� 1121 N.28th Place cNos 6 �( ' s Renton,WA 98056-2168 cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 N.28th St. , , , ,..,///// /////// //////// iiiiiiiiiii N. 26th St. w N.E. 24th St. r v..) N. 24th SL ro 4 ..:.... a N o o. N.E. 20th St. LAKE 15r WASHINGTON •:0: Park Entrance —r v.). alZ GENE N.E. 16th St. ai ai T C a) a) a) o .D COULON N.E.14th St. a MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance '/A 1 c�..� v ?a \-\2.-. Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map I CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED September 2, 1998 SEP081998 bUILDING DIVISION Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. f ' Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, j;g3aAjo crfta, Name: " ar Si71 f 6 Address: J3O8' /l� •a4O cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 September 2, 1998 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED SEP081998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department bUILLING DIVISION Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Name: rYil Address: , 2. 5 t/ Z4 7 4! Nl L G iL. 'bhl cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 N.28th St. ///////7/ /////// //////// ////// O ////// ///// ///// / / /////////// N.26th St. ////////// w N.E.24th St. • . d :•.: N.24th SL N o o o. N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON .:rso,..i 41 Park :;;. Entrance --Po-. ui z z N.E. 16th St. m m Q Q' C N N N a)GENE COULON N.E.14th St. /410 MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance • r".41/c i r"�1 C)c Q a � • Legend • 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map September 2, 1998 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning SEP 0 8 1998 City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager btflLUING DIVISION 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture —66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. r Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Name: ANK tko, -{r Yet kc 6 c4. e&- Address: 7O ? — N' �6 cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 N. 28th St. /////// //////// ////// el O ////// //////////// N. 26th St. t....._ Z N.E. 24th St. N. 24th SL m (I) ' *(-):'..: o 41 O• N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON •:.0:: Park Entrance —01- v�. w Z. N.E. 161h St. ai 6d. a' c T. a) iv m GENE COULON N.E.14th St. a MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance /..-.44/c i' ...31 V.,...--........... ZQc Qa -. Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map September 2, 1998 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED SEP 0 8 1998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department bUILOING DIVISION Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Name: )EA H , Sc i-/G Gc6.,- T Address: /© / 3 1q 9",1./ tti/J . cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 r N.28th St. /////////// / /////// y'/.///// ////// ///// ///// //// ////////// N. 26th St. ////////// W N.E. 24th St. . z m c) .:::.: ):.:.:. o N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON "77‘• 41 Park Entrance —►- w z z N.E. 16th St. m m Q a' T C GENE a)1?COULON it N.E.14th St. 1 Q MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance •r"...47c Qa � . Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map CITY OF RENTON September 2, 1998 RECEIVED SEP081998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning bUILDING DIVISION City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, / Name: AA-Ax_AJ m`(A Z L— Address: /q-o�j A) 2,4, 4)077)1J UM gg1).5- cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 N. 28th St. //////cr////// iiiiiiiiiii N. 26th St. w N.E. 24th St. v.'s N. 24th SL 5•:•... Q d 4 N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON Tcd.). Park :::. Entrance ---10- y. u; z Z N.E. 16th St. m 64 Q T C N a)N GENE COULON N.E.14th St. a MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance r—j/C i' 3, ti .,•.• •••I.............. � Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map CITY OF RENTON • RECEIVED September 2, 1998 SEP 0 8 1998 t.reLLA NG DIVISION Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, ,`",a Name: ql • '4-cc Address: /M Gt-o 7?o J cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 N. 28th St. ///////0/////// ////// ////// / / /////////// N. 26th St. Z N.E. 24th St. N. 24th St m 4 o 41 N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON "0. Park Entrance —10.— y. I GENE N.E. 16th St. ai a COULON N.E.14th St. lit MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance "....../ vio,,,,..... Vic' • a Legend • 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED September 2, 1998 SEP 0 8 1998 L.JuiLLANG DIVISION Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Name:7b,2,GU1 dr +Ai0.J�+u� Q.C�C►' Address: �� f t p cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 . N.28th St. //////i //////i/ iiiiii///// O iiiiii ///// //////////// N.26th St. .11 `_� Z N.E. 24th St. N.24th SL m 4 u) o 0 a •. N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON 0 Park •:.• • Entrance —r•• v�. w Z N.E. 16th St. a) ai 'Q ¢' T C a) a) GENE 43 1-2 COULON N.E.14th St. Q MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Parki' 1 N.E. 12th St. Entrance r"A c.�� Q� � . Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map cITY OF RENTON September 2, 1998 RECEIVED SEP081998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning bUILI NG DIVISION City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. Extemal lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, f� / 114-ca-ji Name: 2r1 Address: cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 N. 28th St. ///////cli/////// /////////// N. 26th St. w N.E. 24th St. m ' . :.0:::-. to O- 41 N.E. 20th St. LAKE WASHINGTON *() Park •:::• . Entrance —►- ui Z Z Cli N.E. 16th St. ai ai Q Q c a) ai GENE a' COULON N.E.14th St. a MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance /..."%/C lio.... Qc Qa ��. Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map ciri OF RENTON September 2, 1998 RECEWED SEP 0 8 1998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning ouiLL)ING DIVISION City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, y� Name: •) , g( z� Address: k13 N��^ Zti�'� Iz v-k q'`3O5 cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 N.28th St. /////////// /////// //////// ////// ////// ///// ///// / / /////////// N. 26th St. ////////// w N.E. 24th St. Z d� N. 24th St m ti 4 a) o 0• 41 N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON •:0:: Park Entrance --10-- • y. u; GENE z N.E. 16th St. m a� Q < C a) c COULON N.E.14th St. a it MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Parki /e,,,,,,, N.E. 12th St. Entrance r-"*.-/c c..._� oc Qa -. Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map CITY OF RENTON September 2, 1998 RECEIVED SEP081998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning ouiLijillti DIVISION City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Name: 61c.00w2._ Address: too 3 N, a-`> eta LA_ cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 F N.28th St. /////// //////// / / /////////// N. 26th St. t W N.E. 24th St. z °' :•:•:::-:•:•:::•:•:•::•:.:. N. 24th St. ro .. 4 N o G 41 N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON 2i Park Entrance —IP- v>. II;Z Z N.E. 16th St. ai Q C N co COULON N.E.14th St. o MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance r•-%./C i —�` Qa -. Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED September 2, 1998 SEP081998 OUILOING DIVISION Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture—66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sin rely, ôarne: Address: / Lt-©5-- t a$ cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 • J N.28th St. ii///////// /////// ///////i ////// 1 ////// ///// ///// / // ///////// N. 26th St. ////////// • w N.E. 24th St. . • • co ¢ a) o 0. 41 N.E. 20th St. LAKE / WASHINGTON • : • Park Entrance —IP- w Z z N.E. 16th St. ai ai Q Q T C Q) Q) a) GENE COULON N.E.14th St. a MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance "...j/c a � ,. Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map CITY OF RENTON September 2, 1998 RECEIVED SEP081998 Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning BUILDING DIVISION City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department Project Manager 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123, SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms. Toth Henning: Please accept the following comments concerning the Tamaron Pointe Apartments development application. Lighting Negligible amounts of light are emitted from the current use on the proposal site. The unobtrusive lighting helps maintain the beauty of the Lake Washington waterfront area and does not cause a distraction from Gene Coulon Park or Lake Washington Blvd. External lighting for the proposed development should be used sparingly and special efforts should be made to minimize light impacts on Gene Coulon and surrounding neighborhood areas. Suggested actions include use of shorter lighting poles, low intensity light bulbs, and strategic light pole placement. Planting trees along building facades would also minimize light from residences. For safety considerations, lighting at the two site entrances should be enhanced if deemed by the City Public Works department as inadequate. Pedestrian Safety Lake Washington Boulevard is a well-used pedestrian and bicycle corridor frequented by local residences and visitors alike. Every effort should be made to preserve its desirability as a recreation site. Sidewalks should be installed on Lake Washington Blvd extending the length of the site's west property boundary. In addition, crosswalk lines should be painted across site entrances. Vehicle Safety Substantial residential development, in addition to Tamaron Pointe, is expected in southern Kennydale in the near future including: 1. Labrador Venture —66 single family homes 2. The Bluffs — 165 residential units 3. Multi-family development adjacent to Marina Landing Apartments. Please see Figure 1 for approximate development locations. . Additional vehicle traffic on Lake Washington Blvd will make entering and exiting the Boulevard more dangerous. An evaluation of whether a center turn lane is warranted at both entrances to Tamaron Pointe should be completed. Traffic The future vehicle use of Lake Washington Blvd will increase substantially as new development occurs in southern Kennydale. It is imperative that the cumulative traffic impacts from the aforementioned developments be evaluated as soon as feasible so the City can plan for appropriate road improvements. At the very minimum, the Tamaron Pointe proposal should be evaluated assuming that the Labrador Venture subdivision is built-out. It is requested that approval of the Tamaron Pointe application be conditioned on the provision of a detailed cumulative traffic analysis to be completed when Labrador Venture submits a subdivision application to the City (expected this fall). Please note that the traffic analysis conducted for the proposal assumed that "... the area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited (page 4 of Tamaron Pointe Apartments Traffic Impact Analysis)." This assumption is severely flawed considering the possible developments described above and raises questions about the validity of the study's conclusions. It is requested that the traffic analysis be redone incorporating the traffic that would be generated with the development of Labrador Venture and The Bluffs. Public Notice According to City code, the applicant is required to erect a 4' X 8' sign on or near the site providing information about the application. Please confirm whether the sign has been erected. If it has been erected, please request that it is placed in a site visible from Lake Washington Blvd. Please include me as a Party of Record for the Tamaron Pointe proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Name: %i:74.__ ✓e-r'/'y // . Address. 4eAde 4-0.e_ Ai cc: Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 f N.28th St. , , ,,,,,,,, / // //////cy/////////// /// // //////////// N.26th St. w N.E.24th St. 1?) N.24th St. 4 in dN� ;: r:.•? CO 41 7 ' N.E.20th St. LAKE WASHINGTON :0.' Park :::: Entrance --►•• v? ui Z N.E. 16th St. m ai C 4. a) a)a) a)GENE COULON N.E.14th St. l'A MEMORIAL BEACH PARK Park N.E. 12th St. Entrance i .�` � Qa Legend 1. Labrador Venture 2. The Bluffs 3. Developable Site 4. Tamaron Pointe 405 A North NOT TO SCALE Vicinity Map CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED 1020 N 28th Place SEP 0 4 1998 Renton, WA 98056-2173 cluiLUING DIVISION September 4, 1998 Ms Jennifer Toth-Henning Project Manager City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Dept 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject : LUA 98-123 , SA-H, SM, ECF Dear Ms . Toth-Henning, We oppose the proposed development of Tamaron Pointe, Labrador Venture, The Bluffs , and any other development south of N 28th Place and west of I-405 to Exit 5 . Our concern is with increased traffic and the displacement of local wildlife. Coulon Park is enjoyable because of the surrounding natural growth. We have recently seen deer (a buck and three doe) , rabbits , opossums , raccoons and numerous birds in this area . Where will they go if this proposed development is approved? Also, it ' s heartless to develop the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park. The disabled and senior residents deserve better than a one-year notice . Please include us as a party of record . Sincerely, Ole&P Odell F . Milliren Shirley D. Milliren cc :Mr John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE *330 Kirkland , WA 98033 DEVELOPMENT PLANNI ITG CITY OF RENTON August 19, 1998 AUG 2 6 1998 Ms Jennifer Henning RECEIVED Project Manager City of Renton Planning Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Ms. Henning This letter is being sent by my husband and I regarding the Tamaron Pointe and Labrador Venture developments. We are requesting that we be made a party of record for each of these projects. This request is being made in writing due to possible our absence during the upcoming 14-day comment period. We will be out of the country from August 21, 1998 through September 12, 1998. Should the 14-day comment period occur for either of these during that time, please send any pertinent information to us. As a "view" home owner whose residence is located directly northeast of the Development, we have concerns about the impact on our view; on the noise and traffic of these multi-family developments and the impact of erosion on the hillside that borders our property. If the 14-day period occurs after our return, we will notify you of our intent to be a party of record in person. Thank you. Sincerely, >L1L1 )4-% Susan and Rich Hopkins 2511 Park Place N Renton, WA 98056 City _ 'enton Department of Planning/Building/Pubnc Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IS COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile homes BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 298,054 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LancYShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistorlciCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ��j c VAJLiz iI ,71--.4�Z�,aeciidO /v1�J �ii-2G�/2e(,(JS ' /��1� `11L�. e,r-tx_c?"-yict-&-7- e -6062 Ib9deva 7,0 _5--feeta.A7/6za 10.c7k0 )4c- /2-7.6=e-i-v7„44,2R,A14 <�, -Gce.�Oj �✓Gp'GC1'r/!'rI rGx�-r�O le�J � -G :CChSf7 � C �oe 27 r e ,4- ,�jP i7i�7D»10c6e�06/P-6, O " / 1Ar-Aeer a/f Ca/ u 2itdamade.�rtii "-'0 - !p" f27. GJ/ f/ E�TC//gy/ rCrc/7 doze�wy�/ ,s/ u z//L/ Y/ 492‘4 � C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS/7L; 1 Grit- .7/ c7 u, �ewt r ce2i,-2 1— f d 33 d fo A/ �v ia��z' �� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. r or A u�ff gnature o of Director or A onzed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 I City c.- ..anton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: v 10,,f COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile homes BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 298,054 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. �/ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS ��,�� () C� Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable rProbable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities i Animals Transportation /// Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Estimate 84.64 police calls for service annually, based on the size of the property. During the construction phase, the site will need to be secured with temporary fencing, and security lighting will need to be in place during the hours of darkness . All building materials and tools will need to be secured when not in use. If a portable office trailer is used , it will need auxiliary locks on the doors and windows (preferably bars over the windows ) , and office equipment and machinery will need to be secured (preferably locked down to the walls or floor with cables ) , to help prevent burglary. The apartment complex itself has two main entrances , which could allow the site to be secured with B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS electronic gates . This would allow access control onto the site, and will greatly help to reduce common apartment complex crimes such as burglary, auto theft and theft from vehicles . Each unit will need dead-bolt locks on all exterior doors, which will need to be solid core, as well as peepholes in each door. Each building should have address numbers at least 6" in height, of a color that contrasts with the color of the building, and placed under a light source. Landscaping should not be placed in areas that will obstruct the views of windows or doorways , and there-by provide hiding places for criminal activity. All stairways and balconies , including outside fencing, should be of the type of fencing that is see-through, i .e. , wooden or metal railings that allow visibility through the fence. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS A second tot-lot is recommended behind buildings #4 and #6, to provide children on this end of the property with a safe place to play, that can be easily overseen by residents in the adjacent units A secure mail -box for outgoing mail is recommended to help prevent theft of mail . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. if lai'V, 9,:_-)D --q(r Si a'ture of Direct or uthonzed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p'aN SiZeu t.eu COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1928T APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTE t41 -ON PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 2 LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North 8 /998 L(, SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile hld sL v, BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 298,0 45 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health _ Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Ike P- 6 a h) ! )41 Pa G-fs be )4-, ¢' la-kg Pg_r 1' eV Ie ((J Co t4ier )-5 � C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Environmental Review Development Services Division August 31, 1998 WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is $510 per unit. To be paid at the time construction permit is issued. The estimated cost for 190 units is $'t(o,Ioo.66. 2. The construction plans to meet City of Renton drafting standards. 3. The project is located in the 435 water zone. Static pressure will require a pressure reducing valve. 4. The loop water system is required to be in a 15-foot utility easement. Legal description document to be provided for review with 15-foot easement. 5. One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpm of fire flow. Building "A"will required 5-fire hydrants, building `E"requires 3-fire hydrants, and building F will require 4-fire hydrants per fire flow required by Fire Prevention Department. 6. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants to be within 300 feet of the structures. 7. The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone#2. 8. Water to be separated by 10-feet from storm and sewer. 9 A backflow prevention device is required on the domestic water service when the building heights are over 30-feet which is indicated as such on the proposed plans. 10. Storz fittings are required on the Fire hydrants. 11. Water valve location and size to be noted on plans. 98cm117W 98CM117W.DOC\ r City _. .Zenton Department of Planning/Building/Lwu„e Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F,,re evete.AArvN COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North 2 1 1998 SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile homes, BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 268 4 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 1 I o,-- �"1- 2GI u rV eft B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS, �j Ge- Lq//4G Co i110Ze 1' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al information is n eded to properly assess this proposal. d, / �� Signature of Director or Authoriz epresentative Date l DEVAP C Rev.10/93 �SY 1 O JR, CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU -NTo MEMORANDUM DATE: August 25, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal J SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apts., 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow for A buildings is 4500 Gpm, E buildings, 3000 GPM and F buildings, 3250 GPM. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of each of the buildings and one additional hydrant for each 1000 GPM of required fire flow are required within 300 feet of the each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarms and sprinkler system installation in each building. 3. A fire mitigation fee of$70,616.00 is required based on $388.00 per Unit and $1,326.00 for the Rec Center based on $.52 a square foot of the building square footage. 4. The divided main access is required to be minimum of 20 feet on both side of the divider. Each gate would need to be 20 feet wide with fire department emergency access. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City c., ,..nton Department of Planning/Building/Pu_..., Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tC.AV1cs-1MlUe ,,,, OMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF """� DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile homes BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 298,054 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS OOO APiPL icA-rionr, G.ocQO Prza3t7 rJO PoLIG`' rSSUt C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ( f Signature of ec or or Au razed epresentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev 10/93 City LH Renton Department of Planning/Building/PL..,,,., Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: cla4tucturv‘ &t1(.{A COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 p/ APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HL< Nitsl� PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 4, 40r ^a., LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North Lb 4%6 ''', SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mobile hori BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 2i84 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the developmel f a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a one-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS t / / ✓0 G /O -� ti C 4 c> Wl RA e•vt G1 9 t E-5'S c:rJ SC I �S Cr U a r 4- € vrtr C.-1-'1- L.A. 0 I `7-7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City ,,enton Department of Planning/Building/f . Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Q,,,laLe 'tee 'ti.. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTINNING PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 78420 "'. qt. LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North 6 � ,�� qv SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 mob* homer c� BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross 298,0134,sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the d' Z gpment of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units, a o ory recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Homeark and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation ' Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS P r o b a b 1 l oo P.c 4-5 14-7 Y b e i44 `/, 9 I I P i evt .,Ys, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Environment Review Development Services Division August 31, 1998 SEWER: 1. The .Sewer System Development Connection charge is $350 per unit. The estimated fee for 190 units is $ o�o coo, 2. A vertical profile of the sewer system will be required. Sewer line to have a 2% slope to property line. Sewer lines on site to be labeled"Private". 3. All drawings to adhere to City of Renton drafting standards. Standards are available at the 6th floor counter> 4. Maintain proper horizontal separation of 10-feet from water and a minimum of 7.5-feet from storm. The minimum vertical separation is 18 inches or greater. 5. The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone#2. 98cm117S 98CM117S.DOC\ • TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Environment Review Development Services Division August 31, 1998 STORM DRAINAGE (Surface Water): 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per square feet of new impervious surface area. Existing impervious surface area and new impervious surface area to be provided on construction plans. From the site plan and project overview there is a discrepancy with the King County record concerning the site area. King County indicates a site area of 515,253 square feet. There are several important considerations to address. This site is developed currently as a mobile home park. The redevelopment credit is appropriate to apply. There are undevelopable steep slope areas shown on the plan as 69,696 square feet. These areas should be confirmed as greenbelt areas and as such are exempt from the SDC fee. There must be a calculation of new impervious area in order to determine the amount of the surface water SDC fee. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with elevations. Provide datum and benchmark. 3. The utility drawings to comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 4. A Level #1 Storm Drainage analysis is required per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Address all Core Requirements and Special Requirements. Special Requirements 5 and 6 to be specifically addressed. 5. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator CB or adequate biofiltration system. 6. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5,000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 7. The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone#2. 8. Vertical profile of the storm system is required. 9. The applicant must prove that a storm detention system is not required as stated in item number 10 below. 10. Calculations must be provided to show peak rate for the 100-year, 24-hour duration design storm event is calculated to be less than 0.5 cfs more than the predeveloped peak runoff rate for the proposed project site existing runoff conditions. 98cm117D 98CM 117D.DOC\ City—. ..enton Department of Planning/Building/f Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:"rypui‘s?or'la-v COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 21, 1998 APPLICANT: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOT IENNING PROJECT TITLE: Tamaron Pointe Apartments WORK ORDER NO: 784 11--( LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North \911› SITE AREA: 10.69 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 92 r 'le ho les; BUILDING AREA(new expansions cos): 298,054 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for theee.,development of a multi- family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units,`* ,ne-story recreation center, and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile e Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. The project requires environmental review, site plan approval, and a shoreline substantial development permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation _ _ Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS (;rc n d L l i i'a c. fS to .be kkz I 1 1'a fe PPS--a(t2cAeci rev/e.,.) S C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. L n, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Environmental Review Development Services Division August 31, 1998 TRANSPORTATION: 1. Construction plans to meet City of Renton Drafting Standards. A construction permit is required. 2. The traffic mitigation fee is $75 per new trip generated. 3. City estimated trip generation is 735 daily new trips. Therefore the estimated fee is as follows: $75 x 735 =$55,125.00 Mitigation fee. See attached calculation sheet. Trip rate above is determined by dwelling units, not acreage or square footage as used in the transportation report prepared by TPE. 4. Off site improvements are curb, gutters and sidewalks required on Lake Washington blvd. N. the full length of the property frontage. A five(5) foot minimum planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. This also included sufficient roadway widening to provide for a bike lane. 5. An additional off site improvement, street lighting is required for Lake Washington Blvd. covering the full length of the property frontage. Street lighting to meet City of Renton Standards. Lighting level is 0.6 ft-c minimum and uniformity ratio of 4:1 minimum. 6. All overhead electrical and communication cables abutting to the property frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. under 55-K.V. to be underground in coordination with the electrical and commutations utilities at the Developers expense. Trenching and conduit location and size for the electrical and communication facilities to be shown on the plans. 7. Entrance and roadway grades not to exceed 8%. A variance must be requested for grades above 8%. 8. A gate entrance to have sufficient vehicle storage to prevent backup onto the arterial. 9. Truck hauling to be scheduled during off peak traffic conditions which is between 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM. 98cm117t 98CM117T.DOC\ � Y • wlwl%Htii•I�•A'I�.Hi s.N\.•':I ice! Y��. - a. r >•L'rw!'r `�r.'H`0: LS-.'�v"'�Jn•,?Grnfw'x �'la..'• ' HAt'+.a..y.�,.w'+Q•' TF QRTATt. '1 `AM O L F. ,. 'Y yf✓.w x.r,>.ar"t ...w:rww..a.;ssx-r�r.:�a.+rw:�t....i .n.r '.Dwxs«w,w.xarrx..n:.owr.:.....w�.+..e.cr. ,A � • Project Name ! ctwvIrvo,i ' P ii(te Apnvtptiac S Project Address 2100 Lnkc (,Jt+slry,ch`c).+ P1v,;t IU Contact Person -o[11,1 (.Ool ho i t i v.+ wi,or_ C r xu Address Phone Number y 25 - g 2$ - 3003. • Permit Number L vA - - 12 3 Project Description Nlulf. i-ir,wti(t c`eVC/Oeh 'LI 04? /0. 6q ucve : 17e . Pv gcs(C 'biclt1�L2i 17 -I i ozzt c lu r� 1,�G�i� �cJ tu'��1 L� IS 2 U�tt(Z o(�vieo4(J7✓�.ttcc !C) 372 veli�cles . Fyt51",c st1r !,0,3 1 Z hotlte.5 Land Use Type: Method o Calculation: i7c 5 fL' Fcjf Ylo @Residential ITE Trip Generation Manual PG,k (24c) ❑ Retail ❑ Traffic Study P .• 1427 - 431 lv-p: tw u.i Z ❑ Non-retail ❑ Other Art(.2Zu),(i ;tl _ 6c17 up„ 7 • • Calculation: >utT n_d_zo ru,l�l iv, , ( 1a2)(C,1-17) — elz)(ta. sl) = 73S ► -o5 At $75 ,. . • ( ST ) ( 735) _ f 55 , IZ5 , o Transportation Mitigation Fee: 55 12 55 Calculated by: ��.6(. WC76 Date: Ve LiA Account Number: 105. 5RR, 31 S0, 70, 00. Date of Payment •o ` • CITX 3F RENTON U. ( ` Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 25, 1998 Mr. John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, #330 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Project No. LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF Dear Mr. Wayland: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on September 8, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Tuesday, October 13, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me, at (425) 430-7286, if you have any questions. Sincerely, , () ennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: Ms. Norma Cugini/Owner Mr. Gerard Shellan/Owner Mr. J. Steve Harer/Owner Mr. Alex Cugini, Jr./Owner Mr. David Sager/Party of Record Kunz Browne, ACCPnTR.DOC 1055 South Grady Way- Renton,Washington 98055 Density: stately 20 dwelling units per acre(after sensitive areas are deducted gross site area) ti�Y O O Environmental Documents that ♦ f� ♦ Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Report,Technical Analysis,Traffic Study ,n Development Regulations r�N`r� Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal Is subject to the City's SEPA(environmental)Ordinance,Zoning Code,Land Clearing and Tree Cutting regulations,Parking and Loading NOTICE OF APPLICATION standards,Shoreline Master Program,Site Plan Review standards,Public Works standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,King County AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF Surface Water Drainage Manual,etc.These adopted codes and standards will funUion to mitigate project impacts. NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M) proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project.These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. DATE: August 21,1995 1. Traffic Mitigation Fee:equivalent to$75 for each new average weekday trip attributed to the proposal.(Credit may be given for the trips that current site development generates.) LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM.ECF 2, Fire Mitigation Fee:equivalent to$388 per each new multifamily residential unit(Credit may be APPLICATION NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments given for the current site Development.) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the 3. Parks Mitigation Fee:equivalent to 6354.51 per each new multi-family development of a multi-family residential development on 10.89 acres. A total of 17 (Credit may be given for existing residential development on the site.) residential unit created. Three-story buildings with 182 apartment units,a one-story recreation center,and parking P ) for 372 vehicles is proposed. Approximately 10,000 code yards of grading(wV010 4. Geotecn(cal Recommendations:follow recommendations of the getechncial engineer for the construction.would occur on site as a result of project construction. of site Infrastructure and bulldling foundations. The site Is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All o1 the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. 6. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, The projectrequires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, and a Shoreline Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 21,1998.This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on October 13.1998,.at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor, Substantial Development Permit,as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Renton City Halt,1055 South Grady Way.Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, contact the Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Development Services Division,(425)430.7282,to ensure that the hearinghas not been rescheduled. If comments Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your spaces. comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional intonation by mail,contact Ms.Henning at(425)430-7288. Anyone who PROJECT LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-Mt:As the Lead Agency,the City of CONTACT PERSON: Jennifer Toth Henning Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. (425)430-7286 Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give I notice that a DNS-M is Iikely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated Into (PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of , -- Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-MI.A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. y� - W aL o a�7;, ° L�?+u ,. y PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 11,1998 e0 � 1p'r`'.� ,It"-."' 4`ill 1� i na A (? `� .. ?to NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 21,1998 • o0 k • p,• A`X" Permits/Review Requested: Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval,Environmental Review,Shoreline &s,,.' y "'! o� ',f,;_ A tat,- �� I Substantial Development Permit.Project will require construction and building L, !';}�4�s. • R a permits to be applied for at a later time. u� J'ls+� + r`�' d Id _ • A_ , • Other Penntls which may be required: Hydraulic Permit Application(Stale of Washington) A A ar-d' is r' Requested Studies: Traffic Impact Analysis,Geotechnlcal Engineering study,Technical Information + jo0 a .:-.,1.., (� 9I. Report(Stormwater analysis) 3 �� P + j.91 r1„ 1" Z• ii, Location where application may p•` f - {r i ja0 00• ° , be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, zf2 / ( 1t{r r y; 1055 South Grady Way-8th Floor,Renton,WA 98058 IO t 1;4) �iyp �ea�' } ' AL W. IR .r, PUBLIC HEARING: Yes.A public healing Is scheduled for October 13,1998 with the City of tmEa . ', .,)( 1 ` A b} !4 . Renton's Hearing Examiner. q \ 1,114N� l �3 I aT� CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: PR • !11 (1' . ` Analytical process KK�I . �,p Y J Land Use/Zoning: Residential-Mu114Family-Infill(RM-l).The proposal Is generally consistent 1 I 14Qy�t1f? j 1 with the policies of the RM-I designation of the Comprehensive Plan and the r...' 1 -in -'-jt development standards of the RM-1 Zone.Permitted residential densities area 4 } j Rt7i ,.5l minimum of 10 dwelling units per acre(net)and a maximum of 20 dwelling units g .1.;:!, I f %° per acre.The proposal would result in densities of approximately 20 dwelling •g ft `�� JI R� L units per acre. GENMLOTDOG GENMlOT.000 -S \1 C iIQ ;. tF,` 4Tj , c) CERTIFICATION Z, "till-/I`f vArf rn , hereby certify that s copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on w6us r Z$, /19r Signed: Z, ,•? ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and f9r1the State of �/ Washington residing i ,o 21 -3ti , on the c , day of c ,e,Q, "if • MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 C)( Y 0 • !TR NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: August 21,1998 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-98-123,SA-H,SM,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments PROJECT DESCRIPTION: John Wayland of Trammell Crow Residential has filed an application for the development of a multi-family residential development on 10.69 acres. A total of 17 three-story buildings with 182 apartment units,a one-story recreation center,and parking for 372 vehicles is proposed. Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of grading (cut/fill) would occur on site as a result of project construction. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park and has pads for 92 mobile homes. All of the existing structures and mobile homes would be removed. The applicant has contracted with a relocation consultant to assist the existing residents that could be affected by the proposal. V The project requires Environmental Review, Site Plan Approval, and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as a portion of the site is located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. The applicant is also seeking a modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance in order to exceed the number of required parking stalls by 53 spaces. PROJECT LOCATION: 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 11,1998 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 21,1998 Permits/Review Requested: Hearing Examiner Site Plan Approval, Environmental Review,Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Project will require construction and building permits to be applied for at a later time. Other Permits which may be required: Hydraulic Permit Application(State of Washington) Requested Studies: Traffic Impact Analysis,Geotechnical Engineering study,Technical Information Report(Stormwater analysis) Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way—6th Floor,Renton,WA 98058 PUBLIC HEARING: Yes. A public hearing is scheduled for October 13,1998 with the City of Renton's Hearing Examiner. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Land Use/Zoning: Residential-Multi-Family-Infill(RM-I). The proposal Is generally consistent with the policies of the RM-I designation of the Comprehensive Plan and the development standards of the RM-I Zone. Permitted residential densities are a minimum of 10 dwelling units per acre(net)and a maximum of 20 dwelling units per acre. The proposal would result in densities of approximately 20 dwelling units per acre. GENMLOT.DOC Density: Appr ttely 20 dwelling units per acre(after sensitive areas leducted from,,.o cross site area) Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Geotechnical Report,Technical Analysis,Traffic Study Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's SEPA(environmental)Ordinance,Zoning Code,Land Clearing and Tree Cutting regulations,Parking and Loading standards,Shoreline Master Program,Site Plan Review standards,Public Works standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,King County Surface Water Drainage Manual,etc. These adopted codes and standards will function to mitigate project Impacts. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be Imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. 1. Traffic Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$75 for each new average weekday trip attributed to the proposal. (Credit may be given for the trips that current site development generates.) 2. Fire Mitigation Fee: equivalent to;388 per each new multi-family residential unit. (Credit may be given for the current site development.) 3. Parks Mitigation Fee: equivalent to$354.51 per each new multi-family residential unit created. (Credit may be given for existing residential development on the site.) 4. Geotecnical Recommendations: follow recommendations of the getechncial engineer for the construction of site infrastructure and buildling foundations. 5. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on September 21,1998. This matter Is also scheduled for a public hearing on October 13, 1998,.at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division, (425) 430-7282, to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional Information by mail, contact Ms. Henning at (425) 430-7286. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jennifer Toth Henning(425)430-7286 `PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ' O n m 0- _. L--1 fP.d K10a:[Gp� t ..Y�cpnD �~ L. \1'v« llil, - . .rbll1111 t .. \ mom' •' wNj 70 L y Q* .Yti" 00 - PTct teCt'. 1`,A Igo 13r y q ...,.+i C 33 a y .= ;t "V Q)4. �f 1 . 1 t 1 Oi / , 1 Ail— d y 1F \ ..,. i8.1 Ja ,yy�tF�\ ., a ; y Od' _ c.I 17 Q 01 V- NVAtila • 1 ! �II rip —I w�v r �\r� ylt,i qr��/; § _�`� _ �1 r� � [mod-`i,1it-.;... ,ci i::.„:`.'14 TJ: 7t . l 3 ti . C r 11 GENMLOT.DOC ti: e a y ) n er g v'? ri::•;;N.:�i';:•..v:t.}r::.:on\,.a.?`v;.{;.:ax:;:`:::;2:}:.?:}..}:,.:,::r•..R:�...:a .. } y 4v/>':•2.W- l�} }-�� :F'.:.S.•yr. .Y.J jr::•. • {. .+Y.rx:::}:r:}rtl.: i{ r.:•.}.,:.ta p • :.• .�.. .... :......... .:...:............... .....r....... ........,.... .........vt. ... ................. ::::.:}:::::.v.v::.:::;:..v:{.: .......::?•;.:b1};xv:}:tvvr.r.f..Y::a;}.vnv::.;�:}::a}}:}}::::::::i:i:::i: ...K.}r........n.:v;•}}::4i::.:i}}}:?:?:{{qv:::::nv::::::::i}?}}:?:::.:�::::::::v}}:::::::rrr::. �.::.- :: .:..::•. .. :..,.:..... ..N. F..... f•v:.x•::}i;{�:?:�:::::::::..:::xi v::::::::: ?::}8 ...tv.......;..................:.4..n.tvv:::::.�.v:.v:.{w.v}}}}:ii.}}:W:.::4}:::W:•v.v. .. .. %' : ..r:....:..........:. .......... .., :. .:'. .. .� i:`}::.v .. :vr v:r::!•:::: ..�'.F:{+i.f:?•}:4}}:?�:}i•}}}}:vi}i".{ii}:J<:}}::?•: {a.. :'.24::.;:,;.}a...::::.::.:.�.�:..:::-...i4}}::-}}>}:•::.t... ....v....DEVELOPMFN .}.}.}::x, J .t....r... "" ,.+r:}.......... v:n+.,Y•r v..v.v..::.................. .................:..............n..v:;:;....,....::::................................................:::::::r..::�::..r...............,v.....::.:v:...:........�..........rn.r.. ...::?y'+'Y:r:: :::.rw:,:.:.�:._:.. �i}}}}}}}:?�•}::•}�}i�:6i}•N.v::}::x::::::t 4: :.... .:: vav::}}}%?r.}Y::4}}::.:::............::. t......::w::::v.v.::::..::::::::::::::::: 'v.�::::::::.:�.....::......:.�rx::m�w::;- .........::.�:::fr wF .v ..• .{nr:.•:.......::::...:......::::::::. ',v:::n: :]j!+..•:.. } :•. a:.t,:.::: •4Y a :::................:......:::::::::........:::::::.:::::.::.�.. ..{t.:.?4: ?.fir {,. fir .::.r`ri..:::}}}".>:•:;..}?.:::.::::.::.:::.r.}:.}i:..x`{•}}:,..::{.>}}}Y..}:.}:.}.}:.}}::;;:£�t`r. ,?.{n{.::::{:}::::;:::;:.::::::.�}:.}}g:.:::::. ,+t: •':t�-4 •:+fi " ..,%.. :�•: ?.3.•: .:yfr:;:?:>}:i;}ss::c• «.:a}:a•:crz4:<••n}:xz::a};>:. is.., •.:%,; :-r •��. '.� ;�} :r.:S...?.;?rnr. �r{';n::::.}.:.::F.:r:R•:!•::::}:}::.: 'y c �•� f. 4i v. -v:.:.........:. ...v..t....\r.:v • : ..v•. ". .Y!'. iv. i}; iv;t: .jy+{ i -i ..............:::... ...}0.. .} ....... . v� .. ..r. .. .. , ... .nh ..Q � '. ?.}'Ji:�� :•F�'•.'ttF'�.•.'-:::.4}':?•}}:?-}n{ ....................}................. :v.-...............t..::....nv....r. '.'.'Ti ....................................... .... ...... ..... ... .... ... ... .. .. :::.r i ..vFvi!f?.:N.}}•r.:n:i}^J:.:::is^i}i:::??::v':�:i:�.::�: ..::.�:::::.�:..................... rY,.,.fx:} tx:v::::.w•... v`m.N::::::,::::::::::::::::::::::::::.�:::::::::::::.�:::.::::::::::..::..::::....::. ......... .... .......�.::.i:.. .... .. ... f......}:!r'::.::f.:::.::::::::::.:::.:.::::::.:::::::: :}}::•}:•}i:.}-:::::::v:rx;•}:v::::F,.:4}:r.}'n ::.rrv.rv:.w::..,r..vr:...v]h.f ........................... .................::......n•.:.:...:::::•.�::•:�::•:::,•.:�:::::..:::::.:.::......::.....:::i.}::..:::?:?.::?.;'.i}}}}}i:?.::.}}:{?.}::??.i:?J:}v}}}i}::<.:<[.:}::::b�.}:•}::X::L.}'f.?{ni}::.�:::::::.:_::::..:::::v.. .....,..... ..... . ...... ...... ........... Note If;;there is.more:than one legal owner please attach art additional;: riotarrzed Master}�pplicaUon, or;eaoh:owner „_ ' PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: j rlrma e /n - PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 6// )V0f C5C) CITY: ZIP. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Reij_1/2-7 9,5?0‘5-7-5—.. TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): - /a d/ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: AUG 1 1 1998 RECEIVED • COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): • CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: • TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): .:... ...:;> CONTACT PERSON :<f NAME: SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE ARE TELEPHONE NUMBER: !;<:.:}::>.}.}::..:i}}}:::.:.;::!{gGAIr DESCn1P :kwN OE:P1RC3�P.FR7"Y1:4ttoh se or*e.§f*et.if b.ocessgr:: .<::<<>:>:::::>:<::<::::.:!{?:.v:{.},.::. ?a...' .3• :?�� ��.:.:.. .:::.� .. ><���...v-�Y.`..`-.�.�`� <}ab���1�#�L�CATIO.iV ;&:���$ ram, `:f::: .yi/f,� .:;�;;_; :Teleismuttetf ":».}}' .. :,:}:r}....h...a....: .����,.,n�.�.•}.�.•v:•:v.,v:n h4.v -$.:4."v; :.,.,�v'�r��.r.. ..�:::.:: }:}:n,R{ .4h.... T. .:.n. :. ..t +Gn nv}. •.: t.Yv,?nY.,rr,::.v....:.:r....:::: ...}A..n.... fv...,..::::.v:n.......:::::•t.".'••.:::}.:::.:: 4:i.:•:.v:::}'4::.v:i+.. .: mot, {yn{ a .....rh. ..... .h t ....... ...r....n.......v n.: .........v..v .... ........................::v::.....:.......:::.v......r}:.•.v..... :.:' +..: rr:.;}t.%� -Y•:�%{.. }.... is ........r .v,.,., t}Ckr"?�... .rt........t.......y..7 .... h h..n.............4:r ah".. ... ::.:♦ .. .i4�'^' '}:•f�:ti? W i`l c t te: , e.":>th t ap i. ::.:'' .' staff;:�n i11 letermin'e .:.:>r.>{ ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT S _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ — SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT S _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $_ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL S _ FINAL PLAT S GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY WAIVER S FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ • MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ • _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION %Cy i'i'�{i:": :}::�:•f.''v::{::y4}:i�:{::.}:{•fiiii:;}i)}i�?�i:•:•'i:4:v?^{ii'•: :i?:iil::i i;}i}}}}}}}}:i•:{w.y!.:::,: {}•f ;,?{i�'iv ::iii}:�� � :3r. �tf;r{,A}F�,iJ"':. ,�•%. .7••.,�ay.•,-.v.., au:'{w,,.?F.4.F-).'S ":% < ;:,'<::r +r:;: r,.fr:r:}r:} ..}}. .,y, "r.r!.:._:.:: •.•_3r•?4.72}K•.} .EC\ .: }'C,t}�"':.} , ..4a rt•• .a•:•..?}-.},•:•.•4. u.,a.}:5:,. ,r. ../so'n{.r, 4:•a 1•, v,.hffin•Y , }f};'x:;:;;:: r�. .�.r�::..r .vr,... r..�......r.}�.:.�,v:�h. r �T:.: rr :��rPi .•xnrh...... Y/..:f..:�}C.}:.�.::?.r... . ., �.:... �}:•�.........�..�... ..................,,.<::�:.:�iFF1DA. .1l.....� ::�'.(N'N R . . ::. {{:.:....ri.:::::.:..::::;:...:>; rn...rr}}}:.};{.r.........:...r.r..r...r..:::}.ii.:::. .::.t: :::.:}:: :.:{. }:: r :::::::. :::::::�:::::.:::::�{..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::.t:r.r}.::.:::::.....::..�.a:.::.a..t :.t:::}:....�r:::.:::}....r}::.�,.....................: ........ ......:.... I, (Print Name) i/�6 ,declare that I am (please check one)V the owner of the property involved in this application,"_the authorized representative to ect t6rJthe property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained end the information he with submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. - ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,a gtary Public, in and t I / for the State of liviA residing at 1-<•NG, LlL`Ttii 1 (Ne r • o Owner/-epr-: ' ative) Ci , on the If_day of a �• 19 3. ✓ ( gnajure of 0 - •. =tentative) �� , .� ,� S,j U� (Signature of Notary Public) 1ti1.t) 6 �} 4 1 �ati v:h n�.,.•.w: i ::v: ki? : ;:i!:iii;!iii::i%'�F� :�f*i }".}.:.}.}}::}::::::::.}}}}}}}}}}i::i?::}h:r}} $?}..}.:..}•:}•• '.v}..; {•i}::}f".,: .i{i•}}:v::}:4 r:it.}• };;{C}.::•.::{: .:vr:. .. +�. .r ....v. ....{ r. +:r r v x .....i r.!ry:'•:}:-ii�iii!iii '.y^}}:�}:{{!•: �:}.`:.:}. '9:+f :}.' :f v.v . :.. :}:A�x..h.iC:'. •} ?r,%4o.1?: ::.ctt. ti• .: �}-�. ! {• o,6,lgf�`:. :iv'.i:_: ;;{.,.r{{:<•R::+%SS.:+•;rf2``:.�kt,{, a•,.ti :•. :ii}. ri,Y ty.. #.. t��,•,•:}�:i•}}:..S 3}r. r.r.. ..}4 }} f, ...,}.'nfyf.. .,•:9.'••'?;:`:•}:4�. h4 it .l ,•a::4:.•::r:. p r}Si:%�i': ::;: w 4:\{{.... ..v.i4.4.vX....tv..... {..n nv .� •.{An.vi•.4�vr a '�:r?{r}.... }}:i{•}!%•.:f.•4::•M:t,... t..4F/.�?<.vft....... ..r}.......... • }... ... ..T�1s:�se�ctlnn:�a:;:6:e �am let..d���«C:�..>;.5 �.�.�.r. ..::{ . r.:.� : ..�... . r::?: ::?n}:!.}:.}::::.�:.... ......... .,....:...r. :.. ....... ...... ................................ :....'�J....�Y:'.}:::,.::..tv..:..a.{.::4:?•.;}.:..:.r::....::rr.:.:?.Y:...?ii^�<::;<�.}:.}}.{::..,.. .aa.•..::: . :::.. ..„.....,.:..�::.::::::.a.::"tt:.::n .,. .: .:{{..x.;:::.:4'•{:::?::.,a...f..:::4:::....:4:i::.......{:.:,. :2;:}:>sss.ra.}..:n.. ...: ..:nr:........ ..k r r.. ..-::. .. ... ... f,, :;. .?...} :::YY:'�•:;;} '� :. �: ::;a:}; :.;:2`'';>•>•>: ••::: ::::y;::::::;:;:: ?.> :l'il 0.65 9.t`..; i::iW?A x:rr.4is,.�;r}. 1 €4<r:A5 t1 ::i : ti ti #?.< a? 1 z :at e1_ •I } ..}:n}.,,. '.a.:.!..::.�rf.. ...(�...L).....�.... S. ::�'. . .+�� '�r'.a�,..'�•�<,' ..tf�.�•r�"''�.�:.f...�.r''�''�.. ...�r... :k..... .,.... ......v•.n..., ..... •v.:•v v..., t..}{.4i;..,. ,x•}y: ,. ..v,K?}:y...:i, :.n...t,t}..vv:.v.••}?:::....f,."...r.,...ri:::.;'v4��},••,:• .t•.iv:.:{:.;;.}".}::. .. x..r.....n... ..r.r:r:x::::n:: :::::a .... ".,..4{.,i+if.:...:•,:?{}:•}::v.}}i':.::..:. .�^:}. .r:. :..r}rr .,4}}} 4: ....... } ...�..:..::•::..i.{a, .,.if.,r: ": .:'rf ... :• .:4':.a-, .{, .}, ., : i }•{r. .}, t .{}••}?,r::{:.r.y}..;•,. {..R:. iY,;.{, r...t:".}:•::::::::i:;:y:..:..-:..r..:-}}� ...:;:y'ir?grt•.yt�t�.Y•{}r}�C't:::ry:::,:.:.,•},:, '�.%74 .. :;;•. •. }4 ..^} 0 %•, `yip. •v, k fi rir ii'Y f:rf+.•R}. ..te �Yi.! r •� :� x:h,�.:::.�..lV1H.P.,.x�l'F:.:.U[�.:h��::�f'.:>:R> ��lU[1�4.r�.r�`,�.,�!ix....��"f�::'H.:::::�f-1f�:::..,0..:.:n?SiFi.-l-1.:}:.�F:..�.�M�%;}�.i1�[1~.t•.��r��.r�..P..,: ::31..r,�xx: "k�{,tt.::.i�.:.t4?�11'..;`<: .......a,.........,:...n.rn }.: : ...... .. ..{{..4.. 4:.r.... nn. ...:.......:.. .::v. . .. }�. .: � �.:.::�. . {}; .i}�v. iii:?r:�:{}�:•:t.}iii.::.:!•::w::...v:-. ♦:.::•i .... :r}$:,vhY{•J. t^C.r v..t.n.. : ::f.• ! ? of 4iJF}`r::.. �s� �::::... : .:: ..... ..vt. t. ...r.:. .4.:... .f. .. ... ... : ".;. +..:' !r.�F;•kff:rrt;>•r•vf{. ,~.:4ti•�'ii>fi:�i' -a}c•..:}}:...;}r{.:;•iii•:•:•>:•:"}:-: �. .t:{.{.n•.•KN}3.t?•.. :. a5:{.::•:.{•}:.:: }::ri0i't�':%f:}/.rr. }..r..:.'in• 4S' :{��"�'..r�•..:.::::. ".'['�T�1f::.iP.(QS1'.�4�'il~:>FRfl�li1JE#3 ::v<�.t.t.x......�....,.f............t,..tn:�sf.<:.�� :.. ...............:..............................-............................�........................YI4:r.r....n......r......}:.:v:::•w:.a.%•' r..4yf4}:4•:::�}�%i$ii%:i::iiiiiiiiY?:i::i'�i }:i}.. ........F...............r F.ri4:ti•}:w::}:i}}}:vi}i}i�i`i:.....r...........................r.....................................................n..... ........ ,...n. ...........................n....n. K?•.....4r.......v...................n...r...x....r:::w::::::::::::::u.............. r............4.......... ' ............:..........................................�.,:.�:....................r:n:v:.v:•............... ..v..v..........:w::x:r..::::4:.a;•:::::}v.::::::nv?v v.3 v::::;....................... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ,•::::}}}:n,.r•.v.,:':". .....f .... n•.v:::nv.::..?h .. :}'?::a}'v::::::•%.nv v:i}:•i::':y:"v}:3:;{::: r:�'�. ................... ......................::::.::.....-....... ::::::.v..v:v::::•:•:h;•w:}:v.....r.... r: ..... +r rf{. rn r:.v.+.... ....................................................................:. ....::.-.. :::::w:.v........,..v.-...-.. ....x•.}}•::.m::r:r::r::::rc•v:/..ri•::}}}:•}^:}'h,., �:i v.}:.:?^:•ri{?::•,.. .v•::::•}r. ......fn:•pi::::.::-::::::.v:v;•i}:h:{.v:::::.:::............. .•:nrr.r.. .:.;x• ;:....-,-n..nv.b.., Y :.::.h:.w:•: :::.:::::.�:::..v::.:v:::::i}::::v::.. :................................................v::;}:::::::;....:::::;:.::.v:::::: ::::•................-....,:.:::W:3}:.:.......... .:.}:.v.:?.nn:;-:::vAC2v.v,-. 4v f........... :.?,3H{}:::.nri::.huv.rrhnv:v:::::::::..::.v........:::::::: .::..::.... ............ ...................... .......:..... .............v...,w::k+:tw:kv;•:n:n.::}'::.... J,.n:;:•::w... v. ,....... .'r`.C.. .n.- ...Kf, r:...n.n..k...:. .,nh.vn:v;:Y{:::...}�.....:{:{. ...:;Y:.}:?•}i}}}i}}}}}}::-}:}ii;:{3}-r}}}:•}:!-}:: ::::.::::�::::::.�::::.:�::::::-::::v:::w:::._::::v::::::::::::::.....::.v:::;v::::::::::w:::•:n::v::::::::.vnv,v:•.:.:.. .:.:. .. : ::::::::::::.v:nv::...n........... ...fv..h-r/...+.. n..-.. � :::.. :v"i::: .:::::::t.};.}}}:}}}:•}:::.:�:::::::.::::::::::::.v:::::::{::... � yy,�, :......;••:::,v:nv::,v,r..::v... .i::i}}..�:):•}}:: :::r':':.'i':i:}"!:i::i:::�i.i?:,::.:}::;v::•::y: i?:}::::.:�::iiii::i::i::;..i}}:};�.�: }. :•i ::' ::isv.vv::w:viY:{:?::}::in'ry':Y:}:Y.:>::yiy;:isiv:;:i}::::::::i::i:.;L{{L?i?}i;i::?`:i::::'•:?:�;;i i::?1;.;:}} :::::::..:::...........:.::.:. ......... ..}................................:. .. _.. -. :,. :?: ::. ::::. .: .:ter:. .. ..... :::•:�. ::. ::::: .._ ::.::. ..: _. -. ... ::h: ;•:. is ° :r..x:::r:.-:::}:}:.}}}>}}:�:.}}}}}•::.;•-.:;•}Y; • Note If.there,is more than one legal owner,pteasa attach art additional' Fctariied.Mas r'to A lication�Of.�E9C11'�::.:;-r}:•:r::><.^;i :ii`:ii`:% i'%.`::�%t;;: ii:::ii%�:riti PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Tamaron Pointe Apartments Attached PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 2100 Lake Washington Blvd . N . - Renton , WA CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCbti T rDJMBEB(S): 229650-0200 06 YOF�[r` `. J '•..�; A �y TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): AUK n / '3,;49 Mobile Home Park " EC V D .................. APPLICANT_(ef other than >�wner} ;::::>::>>: PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: John Wayland Residential-Multi Family Infill (RM-I ) • COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Trammell Crow Residential Residential-Multi Family Infill (RM-I ) 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE #330 ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Residential-Multi-Family Infill (RM-I ) CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: Kirkland 98033 • Residential-Multi Family Infill (RM-I ) TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425 8 2 8-3 0 0 3 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): T.. N A SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: John Wayland 10 . 69 acres COMPANY(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: Trammell Crow Residential $ 14 , 500 ,000 ADDRESS: 4 0 10 Lake Washington Blvd NE , 3 3 0 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Yes , APA Zone 2 CITY: ZIP: Kirkland 98033 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: no 425-739-7655 shee r rF x.�f`necessa L�GA� Dll=5CR1P• ,. N O� P�OPFRTY {Attach s�p�,, Yl. See Attached >€ > Check a(( application types t h at,a Pp I Y -C it Y. tall will determine fee. s ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: • _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT — $ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT — $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT— $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ x SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT — $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE _ $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ _ FINAL — WETLAND PERMIT _ $ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ X VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW— $ REVISION $ • I, (Print Name) ,declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of residing at (Name of Owner/Representative) on the_day of 19 • (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Notary Public) St�i i m d b It aff.)City'File Numbers � .. ' A AD BSP CAPS CAP U CU A CU H EC `LLA MHP SPUD FP PP R RVMP..,.SA A S.;-H SHPL A : SHPi-H SR . . fvl:: SM TP ;V A V B V 1 P v TOTAL f EES $ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED;' $ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 �� CITY OF RENTON - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNERS) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master::Application for each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: çc- r CI, ' 1. S 6eiU-Lti •— 47—OtiH. ,r (p i PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: II i,.. q P1 hl I kk,e7 CITY:%�00�- ZIP: 9100& KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELE HONE NUMBER: hO�G' EXISTING LAND USE(S): +le. 206- (922-52b3• 3/4z.-ok3- 1718 APPLICANT (if other than t wpot? PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED Z_ON!tiG (if applicable): CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: >heet ff:>necessar O� PROPERTY tAttach s�p��a : . ..... Y) ::::::>;::.:;: • • TYPE O .:APLICATION & SEES Check all application types that apply =City staff will determine fees ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE S __ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT S ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ AFFIDAI(f? � OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) (lev246 "V,�declare that I am (please check one) the/owUe(� � owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein conta ed and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. / f . bReprenthtive MA, / y ��u ATTEST: Subscribe andsworn to befor a[JQiac�1. for the S to ofu residing QFFICIALSEAL (Name ) / on the Z dayof 19 JEAN A. BROWN Notary Public-Stato of Washington (Signature of Owner/Representative) ommissionixplres12.9.99 (S. n ure of Notary Public) • (This section to be completed by City Staff City'File Number: L. A AAD 'BSP CAP-S CAP U CPA CU-A CU-1-1 FCC. LLA MHP FPUD FP PP R > RVMP SA-A SA H SHPL-A SHF'L-f-1 SP 'SM SME .1 P V A V 13 V-L� "J TOTAL FEES: $ T TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED, $ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ''.• . :y} f \.t..:i4.♦#.}-{ .n...::$::::::'•:<.v.}:. Y Y C .:.:... ,...,:.::..x:..:.v.O;.::.:..i....�........:....,..{.r: � .:.�..:..:.n.._.-f'..v..T......T:...:...fl...4¢ ....h....:.f.... .v�....::::.:.....:....w i.n.• ..v....:.:aw:.:i.:!::::-.:.:r:;:.�v..•.:r:v J. n....n�.:':�..:4+y..:ti.Y.. .w:..:.•.::}...}:...::.t. •., :•::o}.}nc{.•: •.}i:.:r .-Y.Y: /�f /: /A:•fxfG f.. ti fvC rj•'i::: :.::.' :::: ::}:}::•;�.•,:i •{:...:•`:.:�.{ r. :� :x •..: : : : r{. :iy : x 'l.y�iV,f:/Yirlr }..r:•rx.Y .4.8{r `• � E/`y:»kr;: ; :;'- cio:.. \ : :!a • ::• ::} .�. qq' ...: r h . . . ,IC � Y6. :h.}.:h : : n:.:a . . : :::::::.. :• : ' : .`- a:\ :Mr%u . i:. ,. .... :.:n.::.:n.::Mii: :::: .i :::�:: :.:. ' ' .. . } } . ..f : - % ' {iAY:i - .r4.--vvr' Y :E*S•-•. . 4 A}:}:5:if4{ ::Ya •ri .:{.}r..:t.}Y?-`n*i:ii•::!i DElE,U?MEN7 S�Z LICvS:'DIVIStQ: a - hti ::::,gf :1:Wx,.:T: g::: %a�;::r: :. :::Sr': :.i' '� .i:..nrti:}<n :<�• .-isv v. h�:}•�.:S:::.:: :n?..... .' � . . ..:.: ' v::.:.:vh/: w: . 4 fs : aVii' v �fi"rf �.S+}i�v •+' \t' nvf}o.ik. . � h\ S�ff}' n:: ::.:.: L :CY }f. w :r:} i } �Yi.F i. ? .+/ : n :r iy . . } :.F> }y?• '• Sryn4 � h 4. .::i ) �" }v : . : { fhti }vn:iv.d .Y lx . Gf. f ` i:if?:: :::Yi` ':>r}.v %.;.r..;Y .-•... t Y :W:..r : ASTERApptiCATillitirt .r }: ,.. r : i : ::i:m} { {:.. \. yi} • ..4.v..h.. rt . r.:::.. : n : ,•:r :Y ,k . . .:::. ..... . . . :. .: :::...x... Arrv.::- : :: .; : :f:..........-. ..::.:.:.:::::•: {.: ..:tC.r.{.:v.: :.,:i: v:f ,.YK:YwxVi:.:v :.!.v.;.,!:':::v_:::::.: :{: : tiaiiiigiatigffit....:.... .....:. ......::::.}.;R.:.....; .:•-:::::....:.. ........ -� .,-:h�?.fy?k;: is{. .:..... :..i ......................... dote #f Qhere is'mote 2han.:dne:;�egaltownsr,Piemse aattach art sddiuonal notarized lasterApp(ication foreach:owner - - a' a PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): .................. ::::SAP . ::(i .;t:th let':::::. NAME: PROPOSED LAND USES: • COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: • TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ' O . NAME: "f'C SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): A e •9 COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: ADDRESS: " IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: :r•:;++'hti;;+:i':;.;' {r:$ GAt{::DESCRIP: �cjNtOF.,;:PR©PFRX'Y. Attaeh.:se arate:srfeet sf:n�ce sar ..:.:... .. .. • .... ..?,... 'iNx•:••:. :.. : - :.:- . ;::. -.;;. : ::;:::::::•a::::::•::::::.,:•{:::•}+•o:•}:{•{:�}r::.t•}:;::}:t{•Ti:::-v.:::r:•:a};t.;:{:;T:•r:.:.};:::::'<:>:::::+trq.>f<•:aTr:•}:t•:;+.}.. v '�'..?..nx�.T,�.•.Sv.�!�Y•.....-,.,~ti..tt..:.•t•::•::.,4-:. ' .. v-,••... ... ....... ...{.........,}.... .:� .;:.. ... : }: `i: :i.� '::h}T:•}^rti�iti::rit{i}:::::::v:q•::::::n•ry::r:{i+ii:•i:.i}Trrr::{v::i:{•::{:r:::{•i}j:{ni:{L:L:i::.,.�,.�,.::v:{•}}:.T:.x;{:.;ir:�:.r}:.}:.}:.rr:.>'<.}}:{<.r:.::{.:{.::.:{{{{{.r:.r:.xr}:.:::.:..}'.}}::.}.:.>rrT:.:{.;:.r:.;::.T>;:.;:::.;.:.:;::.;:::::{.}T:.T::>;>:<.:>:::}::::::;»>::»::>::»:<:>::{»:>:>::>>::::;::::::::::::>::>::::::>:::>:::<:::><:>:<::>:::<;<:::;:<::::;:::::::T:>::::::>::»:<::::i::{:«<:;::>:::<}:;:<:<:::»::>::»> .......n.:-.•....:......... .. ................................. ........... ............ w . . .��-:::::::::�v::•n:nv.................... .............................:. ..:.:.........:............:.::::�--.....n..:::::::::: • • • tr....v.,...v.,...-.. .,...}>.t... ..:::: :.................. ♦-:. :�. .; n.::•Xv: ::� :>Miri x{.r c :.;a1t.i: lfca lon;;. xh.a < 1 Ci sta ti.W.l: rmm Y.xx-r:-i}}:trt}'>•.vt.;i; .}ir{:•Tr{{Tr:-i �: '�`.1�he.. k.: ...aPp . �.. . :.' .e�:... .::t.. pP y ::. tY.:.::.. .....:.. �texe ::.e....a:e. . .,.�...........:.T::::.�::::::. ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: • _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ • _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ {4>::;rr:';:;:':.;;:. r<?{;:::r�{>�vt:t::::;::i:f:::x r:r.T:;�;;:�rr;::;:;::::,.;::;<::;:;;:.:>:..:;�:;::..>'::,;;;,:,.:::.�.:,.:{:..:::.::.:,;<�:::i��} . LF�a'.t}:.t:.,;,-.t��hx t ..i , {{,}•r. .r r.tr .a-•::::-}.��•::::•.{•..: =ikk• .ta. :+/.,}} C�£'r.'r2 }fia..•.Rt-.C•x•.•::}...w-}h•:T:>,+::T::r.}}:+,r?fi. '- -e. •rr.#{t"t:b• Skko' b..s.;..,.. „.h;{.; :•.:k:{{:{i:::F:: .-,.,.�:�+�'.,{:.:::r::.:n..:F..:::::::.:.:v.,.r:rC.K{.:.r�r.. a -fir PsY? ..: ::AFFIDA._rT:>�.F::�W:N.ERS ..�.. 13 01,6neI" I, (Print Name) .5#liRP' f, 5j1 .&,declare that I am(please check one)k the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing state "i)hswers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and �r� <:� 40 4 { r ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to befoie me,es Romw2oli,c,in and fort e Stat of residing at: r (N e of Owner/Re resent tive) , on the S y oft vIftr3 ` j l 19 l f 401 - (41,ktJ • (Signature of Owner/Representative) /� (Si' atu e of otary P.ublic)(14 �//d_r-eJc, v:Ai':•.•: .....-.... xm:::.v:::::::;::ii::v;. ..: .:::v..:::4..:.::::::n.:;-• :i;:j:j�Y:j;:;:t;?;{:y}:::.:::{{{:l�:�:. ::.}•:•� .'V ,. .;. q. ..:::n:....:..::i�.:::.:........... ....::'ii?i-.;•::::.v::�v::::..... .. .. :' .:.::::. :.:`:f::}.:.T.rn..:{.ryiti�{::::}?} ?Lr{'r--':}}rr::4: r :{,l;t•.,.� t 5tv+'::^::C•'fr::•r^:::JT t4ii}:•ri}T}:.:; ....... .......:. .:...-..v.... - ..... _ .;>f� J :{..v.:{.-,:Y.:}r::•xvr}{.yi:.:::.'. ...�. }.....T... :..T.............:...:::::.:::::::::::::::f'T�lssectlnn;ta be;:»ra.m let ;CI :..�..,+:. ..,. ...",'....��....r:,v.:x:.: ..:.,.:::::._...... :.:.: .... : p Y ,:.tY .h..�{'i. ....... ..:::.:: ...... ..... -.:.. :.v::::::.::::.. q{{:•r: :'..:�. '+':•.:{{4rr:•i:n}}:4:^i.y.:�i:. .w...; .•.;:.;...:::+v:;•• {.i:. v.:::w::::iii:Yt`:i::i:::ii'<?i%v:ii::ii''v::iiiiiiiii:�...�� v:v}}•::.i'-}i:i}i:.:ry::.,...4 :r: {}h� v'�. .a..}.r, ;x v,,... ::.:..:::::::::::.:.::::}:::::::::::::::•:. .:::.ii}:vi ........:.. ': :: :--:.. -.. :. •:•: ':is .. ,;{4.w,a. t't:+:,+. ::. :. .::•.::>::;>:.r:•:::a:ao-::ao-:{;.::.Tr:.:;::;.arox{. > _::.;% .;::`.�'`-r :. AI V:.:::: .; .ttvr.:. �..;f.,. .: a -.�� _ :'.:: r.-rr:::•};:-r:>s.-.• ...r.rrrr....T•'::;•}:.T;. _.. �.rr{?•} ,r: •. yy�.. .. .})vi - ;t::ri:•}T ;i};•T '. T{'r'r':.. .'}..:-::}r;.♦�i:.: :.:::':::.� .: r:th •':�'it{Tr ::•r?i% T.'.'`• .. itx ... .ri .yT3T'.•. .•.....x rt.'?ry';:. .A'- ::i:::. '. :° 'ti'::i �.�T,rS.f�::�::,.:�A;H>i;::,�f�P:l.;,�:{:.:.}S.HFL-1�=::;::�P:<_:><:SM .5.i�I�.;: :�1�� .. __>�/;;�::.:.��h� �1.11.... S•.... ..;S;{, ..L. a.... :..,Y ,{fit }.::tt.rr.,•::•wr:::::::::::-:::.. :.of{;.{..}:r..�.:.: ..}<{:•.4?-?+":::<•>:•ir::: :FT?v..r ��}}�� n{.. }}+.ti{•..vi •.r.{.n.r..h:.n..:::::. :::::.v..v,.v.:w.ir:.v:A;r:{•rr}:...,r ` Y.�:.. {:•x ..F..-...h.{t:.w. }:.v.:trr:::x...h •:w::::::.'.�.:�. �' '..} :.;:-T:.;:-{.'{. :::.::: : .�'OTA�:�I`��:.r..�................��.......... ..r .........'I'4T�\L..I�.IQSTA>S�•::#'Rffl�l10E�D:::r>::�.,.,:.rr.:.:>;:. ::,... ' ' < .....h .:.:.:,-:::.. ...ter ,r� .....:........:.....:...........:... .{:�........................................-....... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ..:.::....:.::...:... }. v:{}{}}':::};:Y•?}.:•::'}C:';{•:;::v}::iv:•: i.v::.v..'::v Yi•.i•}{:•.y}}i.:.i.. ::v.vvv:.v::.v:::r.}.::•::n..:.•.... •*r.{•'�}.\•.t.{..... :r}r+:?.:v:.•:.••:•:: :: \... .... .. .. ... r}}r' ::•}. v:T•:r::'v':1':::4::3''••f}YGi::'v .?..}:.,rrrrf''.. ?..0. tf. .,{:°$ /-r}`, p/H NfS� t...<.:^C"•.r. .::},Y,..y-.,:.:.r • 2?$Ht:i: fh �! ^ {. ! --' •tit:•r. j .iF.•}.v..�nv:v.4. .� ••+'Wh:.w.r r.Y 'tivwfi}:+%:�::.}:-}:+?-}::h'S}}'i.}•iY•}}}}:+S.i}: Jv ::..et:• .Cis fix• +. ..}�^v�irv�.+..•v.- .:.•�..>..........E:{�.•v�•...�.� ..F..... •vfA v:lw:. n :�.:.•...•^� .. n.:.:..S+i.:+: v:v..:v•?;.2•::.•• vv. . .+..:-.:•.h:.:}:fir.:nv}.vf.:?w:}::}:.`•:•} I'I Y O r5 <Y}i%G. ty$:: v} is}v:':?JS>:}:y{i}•}::•:Y:'- ENT�� Y:};?>hr .{•?;}h�.<.}.rr:;::.h. DEVELOPMENT S CES'DIVISION` MASTER APPLICATIO• N • PROPERTY OWNERS) • PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than one legal owner, please attach an additional notarizedLMaster Application'#or eech owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: J. Steve Harer ( 1/3 Owner) PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 11326 Rainier Ave . So . Seattle , Wa 98178 CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (2 0 6) 7 7 2-3 0 0 0 EXISTING LAND USE(S): > 1 APPL1 ANtiAlf PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: . TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): : • SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: J . Steve Harer COMPANY(if applicable): ! I PROJECT VALUE: • Bryn Mawr Properties Inc . J II t ADDRESS: 11326 Rainier Ave . S o . I IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98178 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: (2 0 6) 7 7 2-3 0 0 0 ,: :.;:::: �E �.at if ttaces�ar... :LfGA�:DE5CRIPT� flF.P�iE�PFRTY Att��h.�� SLI��.:::::.:.:::::::::::::::.::.:.::::::.:,:.::::.:::...:::.,Y�:::..:.:..::::�.:::.:::.:.::..::: wI >< rimn ff.... ................................... >s e .:....:..................... .:,. heckati:a _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ _ LOT LINt ADJUSTMENT 5 SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ . MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: 1., SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charae _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ I, (Print:dome)J ) , ec I- t Z :are t I em please c ecw one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the authorized represenfative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. _c 1 //4eaiv . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for th State of 11J, residing at (Name of Owner/Representative) 19 ,on the .Zz day of (Sign ure of wner/Representative) �3r etie/X�� (Sig ure of Notary Public) s U :: t;z leted:b .0 Sfaff l Thfs. ect( n.to x.om ............... ..::::..:::.:::::::e::: . ::.. .: ................... � 1=1I : ::::::::::::::::.::::::.A �p:. . .tl.:::: 1....................:: PP....U.G►....FP.P�,R ...�'YIVIP..:SA:.}? :>€SSA:>H.....SF�PI..A...SHPL-i-1 �P SM .:.�5.11�1E....TP ..... .,t�.....�.8...:�.H:,,,:: ..:.. TAGE PROVIDED. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 ": l YTt��4[�', h rvn:v}}'{Y d''+�: f r. f ff. ff. }.. .: . $� 'fS k,fi x+ih' 4 Y r y s•..• 3• :•.}y• F ff.. -n :..h�.x•.: '�'Y iY.:i�.Y2�.r F.�.:}i�if •iggi'•:: ."hy`3?rg Sw;tiii:ill •::' <{f. ,144E'ti::: :Y . .s• 'I,y r: f3 r 4. tf r.t. ...4.. :.?p.:,.. / f+• �r•'•>"•a .L�; ., :,r:{::l;�t:r•�.'.:R. .:,: rr:r.,,?.:}}.}�{ n:Y, +•`$.,r7f :...;ao-a:.r:.'rrlx:Y{xyr :�:f?+4:.Na>d:.�r"..,.:.rr3::.dt n.;rrx:ui :.ri<c:�.+//f, •.h.✓fi.'ii }f:` ..4}:. :.:}::::•:;7.xart:. � c- /.:3:.`:.... .:.+.:..•.:.C.<..,,.-:.as. �:.{........t.��'L£�.r1 F?.•r}..ri;f/+.•r.Y,to:?::;.:::Fr. ..{:•?c..:.::}:..,..�:.. :tk:i'::::}.::.#T.rujr .:.! a h:. rrT :.f-.}:P.n�:f."cr:. :..6. ...{.c..•,,w.-5,:.:�r:: y::}TL .n T::.? : ?y:. . :.t ?.' :.x?.. .... .. .�r::r y:t•:u:•. •.. •..:. r .:..:,•:::::::.....yy.4.T. ..: µ;.._: ..:�}%r%r:}r'..:•`.• :.::::.r ^'v ??Y .:.vx::. ...,?nt .. ...::::.v:::............::nv:;........-}:....... ..............a-ry. .}, .. _ - .S�Y.v :::.::.: ......:�:!:.i}::.ii.w::xY::r.3'Li:iF,}:.i}::'-} .f. /.E<-i::}�rii}ii+ .:......rt h::x::•r:ri}:v:::i::::::...n.} :..:::.............:v:.,...........::::n......... . ............... .v .......... .........................-........n......... ..:::.f..r:?n:f. •. ...::.........i�?':::: ................... ..J!...f,.r..r...:..n•-:..•.:..:}:::::::.,....... .:•.. ... :?':{}}•f:r::::rr}:}rr}:-.`• :.{titer}ri: -.....:v.,cn;•_ •:::•r .:.......rf:.-`.•ir:':}:::::v.;:.;.:.:.r::. ::.{,v:v:ih}}::nvr: :•- �: :.. .nhx ............v.................:{ .........vr. .....i..n ...... _:.: .i EN .r} � ::. '. ::.:.. . Y:`'fr::r?rrT}F4}}rr+}rrhhr}i,rr: :.::....... .......................,...........::.�.....}..:f..:.::::::h.�: :?.rr:?.}r:..-.....................................::S�.RVJCI=S.DIV1S10N ., :. ....... ......... .:.: .. :::. .... :L.........:::........:..::::....... r........T..h..•. ......... .n.::::::::.�:x?.}}T},.:anrr::.}rrrr:: ..�.r}rrrrr .: ..... :.:..::.. :: ;.: t.-<: : . . r.....v r.v: : v:.........v::.:•:vvv:n•v:::v.v::;;;n.......n:.n.............. .-...... ...... h: :....... ..... ::r:r:.x•;•.,.:..:: •}:}:}.:::::::.:..:. .:.............:::::+:.:;•:i:ri;:}:.rr:.r:...:::.:�:.:::._....... : y.�._:•:: � ......... . r} rn::r....:::r.::•::r::.::•::::..:•. .�4Ca.. /hv}.:} }+Y : .e. ...v }}y.:MSTER vv..... .hvt: ,.rive 4 .�. .:,}n •�:J:::;:.1:::.:}ii:y'::. :^:?.y,:::•.i:?:: .:: .i: : • ?••:ti''}r�. 4r}r:: . }i}ir h {..Y r :j .\... .n{ .Tr •4v::::.n ::i:{:ni;i}}::'isi?f?:i:isi:: :<::�::i::::::i:-::'.:%it:::::i S2n •v.. ..}u ........,..............n. :.:.. �::•': ... :::•: :. ..... �, .. ' a.:rfi:?y}}y:::::::`rr:.:::f..�:.�:.i`i:.r•::::.�:.:}.i?:::::.: ....... ..... ..........:::.......:.:.:::::::.v::::::::.n•:::.v::n•:::.v;•:.v:.::.v.v:::.:v:::::::::::::::::.:v:::::::::::::::.v............::::.::'��..r..::r::::."?:::::::.y.:::.:.v;:n.:::::::::::.}rr}}r:.}ri..??.r}rr:.:.:: r..r::.:n. PERTY:. 3147. ligit : > '... ... •Note #f•there is more than one::re al:owner?:;.. ease.:.:..: . a:• :.;,?;.;.,:.}: •>; ::.?::r;QN 9 .; ,1� attach art add4ona1: iiotariied.IVLastee.Applicatwrt fo-zib wnei .,: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): ":AP . ». ::»>:.:>:<:::::: :>< � :::<;::>�;> ClaN.T flfother lh*x wunea........ ......... NAME: PROPOSED LAND USES: COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): O ::... ..... .:INTACT . - ... ::::::: :<: NAME: SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): COMPANY (if applicable): I PROJECT V.41 UF: ADDRESS: . ) ' IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: .:v vv::.....f..n::.'+':•}Y:.v::: ,v:v:{.}SiT...;{}..ran..:{::{4.};.}•::::.... .: :•::i:eSi :::::.. ` ....rr • ...r.v: ......vn r. :.:.v:::::.::.... :.v:•..:::•:i.:'I.:�:}f'i::: ...,..{. .n n..,..}v..r•.;:..: f.. ...:. • • v:. :w.w:.K{: :;:;(;:v:C:{r'i:^i fiy+::;:�: �:nv.., ...... .., vk. :' .v �� : :} v.;� ::� :i -� '{if•TT:•i:+r}:: ...�..�,....,......ir:..,.r}.,...,. 1 .. li i n::. . ..1�a :.:a 1 : � .:...a .:�(r i<� rm�n. �::>� ':�::�::>r-!}:::......... sec ::;� L� ca o e :.t � .:::.� tafl~n.....�..l.;d.e�e. a e�s€:>�<:»>«:>::<<>:............. .......... ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ — ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ • MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ • _VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charae ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ :.::�-:::::v:::: .::::::.... .: : .........................n...•.:...v::::::: v::.... ....;�f:.::nvvy}:•.:x{:{nv::•:nv:.x;.::::n. r...:.v:•.\•r': :K:v'i;r.-fi:a:•T•}:;•>:+;:.`-:}:.;,:}}{�;.'•}•':;.}:n,;{..>•.:r:•.r:.}}:>+:;-T:;:.>•: .} ,..n... .. .`:` :..':. _ _;;.. ... .. .' {. l�.{n��/ f �;x••}. -} .r..............:......:. :T. .. :.: :•.:.:..-. .:.... n..:........:�.vv:• ... -. .. �. ;r. ..' lv�F: /.�1.. :..vv:�v`vTN'.iti•`T::;::::r.}:::::�.yn;4iT:}:•:i:;!.i ��`FXDA1l1T<.:[,F..:OWN.l=R�1;�1:...,<".:.r......... �.. ...:......:.............:.............. :{:::T}}:.::.}.::::::.::::.::.:., I, (Print Name) ,declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application; the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. . • W4'e •I / ATTEST: Subscribed and/sworn to before me,a Notary Public,in and for the State of [vC4.4.1. residing at IA (Name of 0 ne r/Representative) S.e. zZ - , on the S day of d j 9_ ititc (Signature of y n r/Representative) (Si ature of Notary Public) :v{is�:1,'i-'::v'ii:;{:i::'`}:::iiL?•::i$iji`?i+:;:i:::jf::}ititij�{:}::ii:�S;L��i`iiiiiii:::::?i'::i$j}i iiii'i:<:i1'ri�:`��:t:{rji:�'riii::isyi:?C`?i}ii::LSviiiii}:f:?::Ti:i�'r'rii::ii`;?i::=^i�:�:�''':}: .�:•::nv:•n•:::::.v........:.v::::........::.::.}:;;4:0:;;{;•}:•}:•T:{}i:pT}}:-TT}}:;:.}Ti:;:{:�::•:lS�:ti:•:.::6ivf.r.: .....v... •v:•.v:n.....•:•:v...•:.r:v::::::::::::::::w:::::.....y:•T:�}}{{:::•:{.,,:•iy{}j•;}:{+ ... ...::...........:::n.......:.:::::::.;r..}r:::::..... ........rv.n r r.v.... v...v ...w.....v.......n........ ..{.. f.• :...:v v .:.. ....v ...::::• v�� '•:::+�+ri?fri:v,•,,,v^:;':T+•i'�Si>iii::iiii}:v:;:}i}ii?i:f?iX�iii::::. �::/..}'f.;,t.::?'-:}Yi}`:K::.J^':::::.F..:..xr}.�.., :T:4,'•�v.........+...�...\,•.S.}•.n.n....:......................:. ....::.....,.v.:v:..n.:.......<.. .:r:•;. ..h :m:::::•.::. {. - {. :; i - �. :::.:.. �;;: •:}.;L•+;{:f 1.{.,nr.in::!^:iv}}T:{{v:T:GST}:•}S}:{.S}:•:{{{•}i:v}:i:::i:�iii:�: �::::•.}::.}:}::}::.;:•}.:. .::::::::::.. ..........,...r..:::::::}L.r .• ... � {;;;•`. s:.}}:.: :. ,.. •T::::`:.:�-.: :..:':i::i::.:: i'`.:iv}:{....:.:} :}>7!+'>. ..�. •::::n ..:. .>TT.>:.r• �>:.TT:.}:.>:.}s;:;;:> .................... .Irll .N. rn 9.r..f:.{.;::.}.::.}::.::Y..:. A�:T.AA�.>}}:.:�S.Ta...... A�.. ;:.;:'�AP.:U:<:::»�pA.:::,,.`•.� ..:,�,.':'."::ia»{<>:S 1�,><:r�::LA:::>::>;:::::<:;:<:;>::}:: f. kf. :7 :, x%{a::.{':: <: ' - ':G>Y; .e: +,••`.{:::.. :S;?::;..:: <::> -;} ':ix`;.:'::}.;.- ,{{>.— ,}fi.^: ::'2:is' ;i 3:?: : :::`•s:#::>:;:;:�#: ' :.La}!..:.'..:�;s,:;c... .:...; :.:3}::: :. .S,f. t .a/' f{ .�, .�f.:..::.rri..;. ;r .!S{.:.,..,� ..,.. 5:::::.:v::::::•:::•:::::•::f.•, •::.......:....:. L,;...........yv{::.}:•:}::::}i:i2•n v.:f. i:•A ..n.................Vn.nr .. ... ..,. a: ! • 'rf ...:. .........f.....-. ':::ii .; "::: �:::ti:. ?•nfF+.i}T: :iyii ivC}ii+)+rii::4iii?+C'r'ri:i:::ii: ,� v�:vnA'•.v;•:••<:w:u::: ij:{iiT�:`iv i�i�f:;'{{'{$ii•{.i,v: 4.v!n r,:v:::::}.v:::::..... .}}}};}T;B:{{•T}T}:{•}X{;?:n4::fw:•}•:..' ::: '. ... .L}}i:} .. �f.n..v.......:.::n:........:'v T' '.::.: �.. ..... } .:: •.}}v .....nn.....�rfr.:.n.....N.:T::.}}T:4TTT}}i........................:::. .........................::.:::r:::v�'OT}.��.:����..:`�'�.,::.n� ..... .... ..........+......';<':1i�TAL�'OSTAGE::::PR�Vi�ED......�...,............f............::...:r....................n.<::.:.:::.::... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 • ::.....v....... .........m::••},F, v'}`\ .:.�. ..._;..., :... .t:t$:.:Y'•.�.:+..... k34:�I/..i4�::if._: �:f{�ii'i4'}:.''�Gitiriy':-f, '�^yr. :R�� ':$'•�,:•�: ti.Z �:: Y:3+v? }F ' j4,r ....cb .. :»;�r��•.,✓ .5. :.:.:#°::?!ia�,':...:^; .,r..F..i?:,ks? ? .•...•:�.'.:..}.{••. • DEVELOPMENT SERVICES• r1VISI0IV .};:.:.:::::............. t^:t:i .v:4�.U.:..v.::Kw::•.v:::{n:vF;,{. .EL ...3 .r} N :::•.}iii:S xlv:}:rv:m:rv.•.v:•ti•:•• • • ti:vF. • P C PERTY OWNER`(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note:• If'there is more'thari orie legal owner, please attach an additional notarized Master Applicatiorifor`each owner. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: ALEX CUGINI Jr. 1/3 Owner PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 4101 Lake WA Blvd . P. O. Box 359 CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Renton 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-226-3900 EXISTING LAND USE(S): APPLICANT (if ►ther hari owner} PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): • NTACT# E RSO SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: COMPANY(it epplics),Ic): PROJECT VALUE: ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: • a�lra:.�:::3hee ><f aecessar.. �.,,r\f U.F.:Pgf�PERT'Y.;A�ach se :........... . . ..................................... )»::::>:<::<:<::.>;:::�::::>:::>;::;>::;::::: ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: • COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _REZONE $ LOT OM ADJUSTMENT 5 _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ _ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ • MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charoe _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ .............................:...:.:.........::.:.:::::::::::.:�::::.::::.:::: :::::::::::::::::::........�1=Fr�A�rr..��.owls ...:...:. I, (Print Name)! / (_j/g 4011.1are that I am(please check one)E the dwnneerr of the property involved in this application,'_the authorized representative to aciffor the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me,a Notary Public, in and for the State of v)A residing at (Name of Owner/ esentative Renton ,on the 0. Z doy of jUly 1925. (Signatur of Ow Represe tat' �,�/n )4,(fV22/..1 (Signature of Notary Public)� li City S ff,).....< > €� `>><<�< »>«><>»<:::::°�>>:> »> >:<:<< :><` >': ........................................................................................(Th)s...act: n.t ._b..:.f;omp. ... Y.. . ...........: ...............................................,:.....:::.:. ::....:..::::::.:......:... • •••••• ••••••.... :.::.::. :.:•:.::.::.::.:<.:.:<:.:::•.;:::-::;.;:::;;;;::::... aIIe.Numher......................................................A::::;A,4b.::::>S p::.:;.:CAp;.S::::.. .......... ...... ................U...........G. ........................... :.::::.:.:.:::::.... .><::<:>::>�»::>:: ...�VJHP:><>><��PUD:::.:..FP::I'�R....R�IM� ...SA:,�.:::.::a�;,N. ..SH:PL.A.....SHPi.-H.,:.,. P... .,..:f1�1>~.:�::�P`..:,._V. ..:.. ".,,�».�•. . .....................................TOTAL..F�ES.....5..........................:::.::::.:.....:.:::.:::::::TO.TAi,:P. :..................................... .::.::..:...........................::::::..:..........:....:::.......:::.�:.:::::::::.. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 Order No. 867411 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1 : THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , LYING EASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY OF THOSE COMMON BOUNDARY LINES AS ESTABLISHED IN THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT FILED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8509110605; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2 : LOTS 39, 40 AND 41 OF ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 41 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1020457; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 3 : THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26, ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE WEST 172 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 27, ELDON ACRES, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF C.D. HILLMAN' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO. 5, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Page 2 Order No. 867411 THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY (200 FEET IN WIDTH) OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4 : THAT PORTION OF A CITY OF RENTON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , HAVING A WIDTH OF 50 FEET KNOWN AS PELLY PLACE NORTH (FORMERLY 102ND PLACE SOUTHEAST) AS SITUATE WITHIN THE PLAT OF ELDON ACRES AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGES 86A AND 86B, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 28 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 16°57 '45" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET OF 43.3 . 98 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 88°37 ' 15" WEST A DISTANCE OF 52 . 68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ORDINANCE NO. 1824 ; THENCE NORTH 16°67 '45" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 405 . 81 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 39; THENCE NORTH 59°59 ' 06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51 . 33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 23 , 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8711230876; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 3 • - , Filed at the req, If and after recordinu „{ai1 to: John E. Phillips Phillips 5 Wilson, P.S. 85,09. 11 k0605 E Market Place One, Suite 5E5 REC"vF 18.00 • J 2001 Western Avenue Ca_1i5!_ r»»18.00 7,1 Seattle, Washington 98121 55 BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT - 7 :. f THIS AO4'JDARY LINE AGREEMENT, entered into this W ' day of , 1985, by and between LINCOLN LAKESIDE ASSOCIATES LIMITED, a Washington limited partnership ("Lin- " TIM^ w .. rf.IN� L,7 .,..SCE rt t: �.l rl ) , and ♦l1 Vl�f.S L.• , VJ r^nr...V�{�l r�.r��.v�... r. r.z .If the Estate of Anna Phinney, Deceased ("Phinney") , and GERARD M. SHELLAN and BARBARA J. SHELLAN, husband and wife, ALEX 4 CUGINI JR. and NORMA J. CUGINI, husband and wife, TOM TOBACCO and NINA ^. TOBACCO, husband and wife, J. STEVE RARER and ; NANCY L. RARER, husband and wife, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Lake Terrace") . ►l RECITALS • CD . A. Phinney is the owner of that certain real property situated in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Tracts 340, 341 and 343 and vacated tracts 342 and 359, C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle, Division No. 5, according to the plat • recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 83, records of King County, Washington; • Also, that portion of Government Lot 3, Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington lying easterly of the easterly margin of Lake Washington Boulevard North, north of said Lot 359 and west of the west line of Lake View Boulevard (a/k/a 104th 71venue SE) as shown on said plat; TOGETHER WITH thai. portion of said Lake View Boulevard vacated by order of the King County Commissioners according to Commissioners Journal Volume 20, page 206. (hereinafter "Lincoln Property") . B. Lincoln has entered into that certain Agreement with Phinney to purchase the Lincoln Property. C. Lake Terrace is the owner of that certain real property situated in the City of Penton, King County, Wash- ington, more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter "Lake Terrace Property") . D. The location of the boundary line between the Li,icoln Property and the Lake Terrace Property has been made difficult to doter.;iine due to erroneous, incorrect or missing information. The parties are desirous of establishing, by this Agreement, the location of the boundary lines )- tween their respective properties. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of establishing the agreed boundary line and in consideration of the mutual promises, cover and agreements set forth h, and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of whicn is herety acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Boundary Line Agreement. The parties agree that the boundary line between the Lincoln Property and the Lake Terrace Property shall be the following described line: A line in the west half of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, said line being more particularly described as follows! Commencing at the most northerly Brass Plug on the monumented centerline of Lake Washington Boulevard North as shown on that certain Record-of-purvey filed in Book 31 of Surveys, page 182; thence S18 I4'33"E, algng said monumented centerline, 1045.57 feet; thence N85 10'44"E 3n.84 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the !t; northeasterly right-of-way margin of said Boulevard e being a line parallel with and 30 feet northeasterly from, as measured at right e': les to, said monumented p 9 9 �-i centerline, said point being the True Point of Beginning of the herein described line from which point an iron C, rod with plastic cap stamped TC & A (Townsend-Chastair. & L^ Associates) bears S85 10'44"W 0.24 feet; thence U' N85°10'44"E 106.76 feet to a point marked by a one-half inch round iron rod with yellow plastic cap stamped "DEI 11914"; thence N01°23' 12"E 259.55 feet to a point marked by a one-half inch round iron rod stamped "DEI 11914" and the terminus of the herein described line. The boundary line shall be as shown and described on that certain Record of Survey prepared at the request of :,inccln by Dodds Engineers, Inc. as recorded in Volume -56 of Surveys, at Page /70 , under King County Recording No. 8Sb511900s , which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Survey") . The boundary line described above and as shown on the Survey is hereinafter referred to as the "Boundary Line". 2. Phinney Quit Claim. Lincoln and Phinney hereby convey, quit claim and release to Lake Terrace any and all right, title or interest in or to any real property lying northerly and westerly of the Boundary Line which is adjacent to and/or contiguous to the Boundary Line, together with all after-acquired title. 3. Lake Terrace Quit Claim. Lake Terrace hereby conveys, quit claims and releases to Lincoln any and all right, title or interest in or to any real property lying southerly and easterly of the Boundary Line which is adjacent to and/or contiguous to the Boundary Line, together with all after-acquired title. Lincoln's Vacation of Street. Lincoln hereby agrees to petition and, in the event of vacation, to pay all costs, including all required sums to the City of Renton, to vacate that portion of 104th Avenue SE (Lake View Boulevard) lying west of Lots 340 and 341 , C.D. Hillman's Lake Washing- ton Garden of Eden Addition to City of Seattle, Division No. 5 as recorded in Vo'_ua;e 11 of Plats, page 83, Records of King County, Washington ("Street") . Lake Terrace agrees to join in, support and sign the petition to vacate the Street. 5. Deed to Vacated Street. Lincoln and Phinney hereby quit claim and release any title and after-acquired title to any and all right, title and interest in or to any such portion of the vacated Street lying northerly and westerly of the Boundary Line to Lake Terrace. Lake Terra' hereby agrees to quit aim and z 'ease any title and .Pfter-acquired title to any a; right, title and interest )r to any such property vac____d Street lying southerly anc sterly of the Boundary Line to Lincoln. 6. ALthority. Phinney and Lake Terrace hereby warrant and represent unto one another and to Lincoln that they are the owners in fee simple of the respective real properties described above, that the consent of no other person or entity ;.s necessary in order to fully bind each of them and their respective real properties in accordance with the terms hereof and that they and/or the parties executing this Agreement on tiieii behalf have full pv.w i ilt.0 uut. cilLy av tv bind themselves and said real properties. L7 7. Mutual Releases. The parties hereby release and O forever discharge one another from and against any damages, t:D liabilities, costs, claims and causes of action in any matter Aarising out of this Agreement, the Survey and the establish- ,t ment of the agreed Boundary Line. T .e• I' 8. Costs and Expenses. All costs and expenses associ- OD ated with this Agreement, the Survey and the establishment of the Boundary Line shall be borne by Lincoln. 9. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and may not be modified or amended except by a writing executed by all parties hereto. 10. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, devisees, successors and assignees. This Agreement and all provisions shall be covenants running with the lands herein described. 31 Attorneys' Fees. Should any dispute arise con- cerning the terms or effect of this Agreement , the prevailing party in such dispute shall he entitled to recover from the other party cr parties to the dispute its costs and reasc• able attorneys' fees as determined by the court . 12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall in all re- spects he inT terpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 13. Counterpart Execution. This Agreement may be executed in counterpart by the parties hereto and each Agreement executed in counterpart shall constitute the entire fully-executed Agreement by all parties hereto. DATED as of the day and year first above written. LINCOLN LAKESIDE ASSOCIATES LIMITED . By: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY NO. 369 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY sr .L= is C ;-L n ` _ Its G' neral Ptrtner5 THE ESTATE OF ANNA PH UNN//EY By . \-- Thoman H. Phinney Personal Rer yenta _ •:ev GERARD M. SHELLAN -�— • BARBARA,J: S'4HELI ... 'EX C ' NI f • NORMA` . GZ ruM ' p&t.LO t f �/• - c.tea_.: �1� -NINA IL ACC i i . STEVE H RER t_,f/u t.-t.. NAN L. HARER ri STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me , to me known to be the of LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY NO 3u9 LIMITED PAFTNRSHIP, the general partner of LINCOLN LAKESIDE ASSOCIATES LIMITED, the limited partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said limited partnership for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was duly authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of the limited partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and =^ai t. Tk�s *thi day of ; , - 19C5. so t7 • lPU9t\ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the 9 0.• State of Washington, residing �\r at .;� _ ' or y4 5oss,: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me THC1•::..*, H. PHINNEY, known to me to be the individual that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed on behalf of the Estate of Anna Phinney, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal bereta affixed this day of , 1985. NOTARY PUBLIC in anu for the State of Washington, residing at STATE OF WASHING'.'' ' ' ' SS. _ MINTY OF KIN . i On this day personally appeared before me GERARD M. SHELLAN and BARBARA J. SHELLAN, husband and wife, known to me to be the individuals that executed the within and foregoing instrumert, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. sa- WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed this .;' •T.'' day of l , 1985. 5'* -T i. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing pat y '. f t• l a4 LID 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 1 ' SS. 41 .4 rq 7) COUNTY OF KING ) " T On this day personally appeared before me ALEX CUGINI JR. and NORMA J. CUGINI, husband and wife, known to ma to be the individuals that executed the within and foregoing . kN instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as 1 their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and ''�,', purposes therein mentioned. WITP'ESS m�j hand and official seal hereto affixed this ;, 7t' day of (/.!i C .Laic , 1985. .: i seL ni-( a NOTARY PUBLIC in and t r the Stat/ of Washington, residing i w STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KINJ ) On this day personally appeared before me TOM TOBACCO �# and NINA D. TOBACCO, husband and wife, known to me to be the :.� individuals that executed the within and foregoing instru- ment, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. '' WITNESS T hand and official seal hereto affixed this .A 3 day of /.... ec/ L, t , 1985. _ ( _ _(..E4z_k.iat_ (_ -tin t f ;'tp' NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the ;gib State of Washington, residing at _s9._13.) .ilk • 1i3, ; . T 5 t gzfe'•L. =1—L< A. --�S I .-7 i SATE OF WASHINGTON ) / COUNTY OF KING ) ;I On this day personally appeared before me J. STEVE RARER 't and NANCY L. RARER, husband and wife, known to me to be the -11 individuals that executed the within and foregoing instru- ment, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their • free and voiunt^ry act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 0- •,- . :..- 0 . ... i4--, WITNESS any hand am. official seal hereto affixed this p. day of ( ?,,e1/1_,_ti-- , 1985. '1. I ---, 1 Y NOTARY PUBLIC in anycl for the , • . _ - . . , 14 State, of Washington, residing ti..,„•:: at S 7 -Y) 5,1. ii - . . .. .. Ei `....= alt& i . . r., r: ti 1:‘; t: ,s •••:;.[: Iti ''i': CD i'..* 0 — ri ';- r-I a .t,,: c.:D ,. V) .. ....! f.... O.::: ...- p: 71- •-•;'. ..,:. a..!.:- . .... ,.c. f...: •:! ., N. t.%.: ilt• . . _ 4-- t4; V . S, V Y.• , I-. 0 .i. t;:. 1. V e ..... §:-. .?:,-.. ,:.... M E7. .IBIT A • Property Description of Lake Terrace Property. PARCEL A: 1 1! That portion of government Lot 2 in Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5, East, W.M., tn King County, Washington, lyin% easterly of Lake Wauhington Boulevard; except that portion platted aa Eldon Acres, according to the plot recorded in Volume 11 of plr ts, r_ aq•_ 86. in hiow County, t.'a::F.ieet.nn; Together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th. Street (formerly known aa Mildred .veruo) adjoining, that would ettach by operation of i:.w; 3+t PARCEL Bs ee 4.j Lots 39, 40, and ►�1, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in ��, p Volume 11 of plats, Page 86, in King County, Washington; except that portion of Lot 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by iced recorded under Auditor's j'ilo No. 1020457;.� ri 3 Together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th. Street (formerly to known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would attached by operation of law; g • i PARCEL Ds . If Lot 27, Eldon Acres, according to the plat receded in Volume II of plats, Page 86, in Kin:,; County, Washington; situa.e in Section 5, -; Township 23 North, Han 5 K.W.N. L PAFCEL Et That portion of the North half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest =4 Quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5, East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows. .y i Beginning at the Southeast Corner of Tract 26, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Vo?umu 11 of Plats, Page 86, in King County, Washington; thcnco West 172 feet tc the true point of beginnin:?; thence ' g West to the point of intersection of the south line of tract 27, Eldon ;3 Acres, with to Went line of the East half o." the Northwest quarter of ,i said Section 5; thence South to the North line of C.A. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5, accord',.ng to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, Page 83, in King County, Waehirgtor; thence knot to a point South of the true point of beginning, thence North to the true point of be;;innine; except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the - - Wcoteriy margin of the abandoned right-of-way (200 feet in width) of Pacific Coast Railroad Company. ' e Parcel Acquired From Tom Cooke: t That portion of Le,. 26, Eldon Acres, According to the plat recorded in - Volu_mo II of plate, Page 86, in King County, Washington, lying Westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the South line of slid lot, distant 122 feet westerly of the Southeast corner to a point _ on the North line of said lot, being 236 feet westerly of the Northeast corner of said lot; together with the East 1 of vacated street adjoining said premises VAC-2-80 PELLY PLACE NORTH • Crdinanco No. 3447 That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest one quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., having a width of 50 feet known as Pelly Place North (formerly 102rd, Place S.E.) ae eituateri within the plat of Eldon Acres as reuor'led in Volume II of Plats pages 86A and 86B records of King County, Washington and further described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest °truer of Lot 28 of eaid plat; thence South 16° 57' 45' st a.kng the easteriy right-of-way line of said street of 433.93 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 27 of said plat; Thence North 88° 37' 15" West a distance of 52.68 feet to the South- east corner of vacated S.E. 100th. Street (formerly known as Mildred lr (5 Avenue) Ordinance No. 1824; LD C5 Thence North 16° 57' 45" West along the westerly right-of-way line of said street a distance of 405.81 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 39; lf? Thence North59° 59' 06" rant a distance of 51.33 feet to the true point of beginning. Li - 4. It 4 .8. - r•.,wev borerls•'.T.'T► ---•,-rr•rnesT�•sa*m•-'•9--- -tr--- w --. .-•1r.-----a--_ • —-•'•------ - -_ - .-..- - _.._._• - - ! *t1*rf s�srnirr•'tRyl•-•-• Rf4""'.'•'117.-0=YSlloris �t�tflerllr�rer•^.2�'rl•.-----'•-a..,.nr...»r...•--_.._. .-. ----.---- ---."•.«®®.�.►— • .r.�..-_.-.a�+n.t's•w:r.. 1 ''i,1' ' • • :MUNI"'{. IM ' i.. A..i. .:..i.' L a I,' ' r' li g i®tii i•, I ' Amp .if 1 ", L. ;•1+ 1 1 `4 r �: •'`, ►• ' • 1 • Tit: n D N o «N. • ! { + • { . ,, "1 •i 1 : { • .A i 1 S '1 - �. F .� fs p'O ; ' 1 • •( 1 • '•s'i 1 f 4 + :..s , *. -,. 0 i . • j.• ', i'� a'� � bi'��'i'� o o • 1• 1 I� ,-; �•! •.� � j $ r '��3 l.� , m i 1 ' ��««hrri , MW P'b {. �O-'�1 O MM .. } i ` a�• L 11 ;••••;' . � '� f , :1 ! O Ci• Ij { . •' I Cr •1*.I C O .� Owl , i.' + .•• O•1 i'' •rOO,Oapo p. .3tltl _ , , , , 1Is 41 r , VI .Ll tY. M M L.•�; �+ Q. 4 ! ••, 11s • �I ., ,�., V , •1 •op 4�QQ� :I� Y Wo+m o {. a I f• I ! ! 00� I •1111 • a• ! '` `I .w 1«.x 'le ;d 'aa : ,,ii, I h i+ � i i t " 1�1 m•' a. a tamp �o ` • �` + 1; 1 s ;i I {. '4!i + �� I� • �I,� •'!1 I rt. O, . • irM 1 F AN I. 1 ' ( 1 , ^ 1f l :1 �� • d,G v, ei ..PPPgC 00pp it i I� y f' f. , • ' : I -'w !i+ 1 .d� 121 4-4 .� O tS d 0, � r4v •• y1, I p ',I I' 1 { • 'i � a. l +'�� OF 'c• ,� —.0 y O W '.• c7 C • I 1'rl i' 43 1.'.fli I ' 1 r • ,{yt_ c . i a, s l ►y m ` o. o ' '� M 'd o `rdr i! !' �,f 4 el`. I d 11 .• 'o l°4i : <{ I - .i p 1 i. 'e d ' �G ;eo R 011 • L. « .. . • it o :i 1I + AV M O . a I_ IV I • �' ' f O' i+ , v ty '� .s �,m O 'Iti.44 1. d 6.1 .O I, �. t sii c 1 vl� t 1 lu O R w w 3 ipp. c p a ' ri d < , i i t'I li 4 tt '•,''v ' I ! •� 14i i y�'.re�'• It:.I :O .1-O.11% Pm t � :I 9 I� I. E' �" 1 • ,o tI • 1,, , , • P WZ .IR', ' O V 4 ,r.. H 01 O - •7� - - : i I u ,� lS �tfc� . • i•i ._ �. o 4...p.11 o rc. en mtt .1 u.t• H, • s 1; i {I! f, _ %{ I Phi 3, f 7 I. 1 4 t e - fti- " o r•� ooi ..i 4.. •c O o a;7ae I• 1 { +• .�• [€p y. o ? ,. I I. P O o N .+• O I F l {9 1. C :, 1 a R m,-.V. R e F d f p i r • I, • i <t • w v'«'I o p ra to o a.. ') ( I i I I I r j • 1. 1 Fj Q .i a .+ 1 ,� �.� ,+ i NON a b a •V V IC f ,f ' ff ,# 'l1 F 1' y H F• 1t' 0, E.'' . >V T.. .. • H't! i i• '.r l rc �`�. �a. o �cl' m R I � { . I e (' .+ ,..*. e' • L , It,. ` , �i ,!• i ''r•, I ' 4 !• y w 2' o O r •a.r O Fl • C ..4 0 : , 4 • 1 { V�, V77 " '!' o I I ' 1 c I a {, I • c,, . 9 YI N 'Io oN''. .0 'Y + 1. E` , j qII '� • _ 4i 80.f. V .•i F.V. C Mi O ! 11' O • i ' `,' + I'' '�•i i'• ,11 r I a; O O R' 4 .�� O• C. m O O ., I , 1 • ` O b •i L1, Jp M. A b 1 !., I 6 F Q O 47 A M fr T: . xt 1 I' •I ,3 . I .I'Ill" r .'s• 910 • ol --,1 IL . -)a o -,1 O V L•1 ••• •+ a l 1 a b • (•r f{ I * .. O « fy • • V R 00 k ! 1, 1 '' r3 h 1 •,( Pis p 'i .i b IS O ''., i'� . I C • tp•i O w. I Q a 0 O �. o m , p� 11 i� ;I a {� .Im 1 tit" � O '� -. ... 1 O O. • i I O a J.0 y .O Q o •• i „ .io ` eC o•�� o o. m .11 11 1c '•1. , a e. = g e, ti 3, y a 4 e. "i 3 a. F a ,e a �MG� s. w o I I i4 r~ 0 3. a k - i o . �• { .: w.- a o E. a o , -.•••L lQ E I' 11, . i I I o f W I r• .,� • E .0 'f :. 1. F Lf - lts I v :J M ,,.`••l .+ O am ;1•Ti G c ( , ,• .. 1. ! ! .• , �. • •• s! c I. O C d .• ssx �. m tf I F I , ... f e. I _ 1 ;1 1 {« ' . C , r.•• • .•1 ••• rat m rto I I I t • I o l I r r r y if„ I jl G O` FI Q I `� R; �, U M Ul m t.1 1 I G I 1 $ I� .01. j I ' S. a O 4e .Ts G N m .•. OI t - 1'D ` • 4.1 t�• r 1 5 • I: '� '{ _ i �Q11 ' .b d : C I 0 r-, 00 p • .• . ' ,I j �' ' • P •. F. • i,I . . • • tt I • • ♦ i i I. • i , �1 • • I�( 1 •11• r .4` •� .. • 11 1 '' I I 1 .I I I. 'I '. i ' • •...i�?uw.••••"`Y,,F.'cw.'e„- ,y..,-. • _• 1. - r. ; � ..r, :.. .i - • • c - .. .. • FlTi'S ESCROW COMPANY • . ORIGINAL . .... 11731RatrtrrAviawg.,&MilA•ta lit.C:it,.o 'tri,. '4T 1111SSPA('t?M)it1lJCORI R"JUSIL ganN,Washington N117g -' J`. il Igo IRI'IS ISC WW COMPANY NOV . ; .� 1• P.U.D 1460 ('L'Doi Ranson,Washington 916137.14Ro • ,' r;u r 2 3 1987 •: `' 4A:117102h.1)N.() Nil 14071 ', �U��750"!a'2 r te_ 1 : t!0 76 1, .r. • N Vi..•,'.1. titrr?.00 "'3k• ,/ a1 i '.jtii.-• cl STATr►TORY WARRANTY DEED r. '„+ ft.(lreit..(II KARl)M Stilt I AN and IIARIIARAJ.SI117IJ AN.hu.hand and wife.Al Ill(CI'GIN1 and KONMA 111'tdSe huahrd 4. 9'4 and tore;MARIA11(II'.I I I)I'I(I,a widow and MARK'R11'.L.IA)I'14).as renewal representative of the the es'ale to MIKI•in I'ttill). I)ni'eue,King County Pr bole No.144-l-010224r.t'OM't(IIIA('(U ama NINA D.l'011ACC0,husband and wife;and J.NI I:VI:ilAIU 'aid N NANCY1.IIARItK,huahandandwife;doingbusinessasl.AKPIIliRRACEASSOCIATIS,aJointVentureforandIntr+nekhtntmnrI'I..tandCCI Nn/100(S10.00)Dollars and other Good and Valuable('nits'drration,in hand rid,cower and warrant to the(ironies*/IARY II.DUINIISand '.X` PAULA L.DUBOIS,a.husband and wife,the following*berthed real estate,situated in the County of King.State of Wahingtue,to ME ..= ,v. .�r �.` PARfTit A ,,v\ Lot lidS 27,ELDON AC1 ,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats,page 86,records*,King County Wmtiinglon; ,p'-:.�;� EJ(CEPT the EAU I lalf of vacated road adjoining said premises as vacated by City of Renton Ordinance No.3447.recorded under King County — :...-_- recording no.801006014& .. ;.r:e:: -.a PAtlflrl IP ;- ,:w. `�(�`p_ That portion of la 2h,ELDON ACRES,according to the plat recorded in Volume I I of Plats,page 66,remrda of King County,Wuhtngton,tying • ``>: W Warily of a straight line*Mending from a point on the South line of said lot,a distance of 122.00 feet Westerly of the Souther*corner,to a point ' oa the North lire of nail lot,beIng 236.00 feet Westerly of the Nonheut corner of said Lot. .. Q `'R TOGETHER WITTI the NW Half of vacated road adjoining said premises vacated by City of Renton Ordinance No.3147,recorded under King '..'{' County recording na 11010060646 , RISCRVINO unto the(!cantors their succeuora,legal representatives and snips,a permanent casement for Owen,egress,utilities and for '= improeementa located upon the premises.The Grantees shall have no authorized use of the easement arse,described as follows: .:V.: Degirr, pit IM bulMros(comer of Lot 27.1 1J30N ACRES,according to the past recorded in Volume 11 of Piet.,row R6,recorde of ling ".':ez County,Washington' c' Thence South lie 37.13'East 40.00 feet.'core of less,to the toe of slope shown on record of surveys recorded under King County recording .;?_ i Na 7912119007; IMna Nonhwestarly ahmp the toe or slope to the intersection with the Southwesterly line of said la 2 f,being North 16`37'43'West 111100 _ feet,more of km faun the point of beginning; ; Thence South 166371$'Vast along said Soulhwestery leas, line R0.00 feet,more or to the point of beginning. F_ _ EXCEPT that punka(of vacated street adjoining,u vacated by the City of Renton Ordinance 3447 under King County recording no. • •• t 0•' / 060646 SU8JECT1O: •ilt?- I. Agreement.,Conditions,Easements,Reservations and restriction which may be contained in the Plat.State and federal Pal^".. I A.Easement as dlarkwd under King County recording m,6700773 u recorded on October 6,1970 3.An Naaamenl s dW hwW under King County recording no.671a)779 s recorded on October 6,1970, 4.An Easement as diurkwd under King County recording no.77092110593. S.Tans and Conditions and Easements u disclosed in City of Renton Ordinance No.3147 under King County recording no n011Mn,19.M 6. Rio w se diarkd In instrument recorded under King County recording no.R312050513. io 7. Covenant running with the land for Developmental Rights f,r whoring property owned by the Gunton along the W rut hwstcry line id Said Iola 27 and 21,ELDON ACRES,according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats.Pep 86,records of King County,Wiehmgion an follows' e.i i• L llr Orator,IMIf lartesann,kpal rcprc.entstives,heirs and assigns shall in no way interfere,obstruct,hkrh or In any wit hinder the dmitnpn ental righla pertaining to or inured to the adpaning property owned by the Grantors,their suceewns,tool represenraovee.heir end insigne and sepvlely waive and relinquish and ngto to protest the construction,maintenance and development of any Imprwementa on v', the Grantor'property a long asthe same arc constructed and maintained in compliance with coming laws and regulations of the()iy of TYY' Ranson, h.ma amnion,IMO surceisors,legal representatives,heirs end asaips are 1101 promised a view easement by the flrentnie with convevince e of said lots 27 ant)X. Minims expresslydisclaim any warranties,eapreu or implied,as to view.MNI cewu lion or geologic.'faction. :� :.;s.i; • r! • • . • , v tw 4 hit C. The Grantees,their sw esson.legal representatives.help and swim Mall In let way directly or Indircrily hnnp any actions roosts id anion.claims,demanda,filar lard,V ele wr eapeneea or conaenuentlel dither.Iti he l.nniShi,enunE col id,or in any r ay prising DUI of.aiy developments of the ad$tnfnE pmpeny welled by the(ininton their sunwon,lapl repose/mama a,heirs end*unpins ACQ 1'IT'.D AND APPItOV11D: OARY D.DUBOIS — - RXU7ic1rDU1R1l{— _.- -- _ _- • Dated: November 3,lyh7 IN G' RDM.SI11'IAAN A /AKA NI : • CZ (N.I i -- - `...__''-k...--(.4". GINI —� % NO ATCI!IgNI ( • r . • !' `, • - MA0.1 ' -IA)1'ix),Individually and as �personal representative of the veleta id NIKI!N.III I'll).Oct@wird.King(',.unty 1'n,l.ate No VMa-01022.61 ` ; CO )JJ r t' e' / er ' ' ` L 'row TOBACCO Of, '`d t e 'aItNA D.'tiliini•(xl - —______ _ wz. r '` - STATE OF CALIF913,11A. ( SS OUNTY O C F is 4 a.'e-•X e Or On '• —_t�(••JC!L / `3, /C.J 7 ......•mr ihw un,M,•..innl •No,w.y Vul..„ ,..n..I In .....1'wn.r i..'•..n..ny n.pr.n•r _ L/ 11 [ a- oil.6.. . pesonelle known tome 0/paved lu TO A the RIM of Wtnle.1u1y nniailc,lu 1w the Peih.nl,I whose nonel,l • (,a tullitritiad to the within InNlo:nant end ecknowteitae.l that _ ..V,'4'' a•N•u hal the t.•.n• WITNESS my h official real I ± I .14-t•:. lilll i 'If AL (kw) •r., N'�ilr,'1;';•, r AL (AMA - `�v `�1 ,,�' 1.1 :r.:,Ns.l l C.oJNTY - • ty- 1 . y,.r.rem,. wo,(yv,..Apt.30.1938 A lNnt,..y P,.i,..t.%.,,......,...1 1 e•1te a1 OM endlnduel Notarial Arb.uw/edemant 1 • • • ( , , ^ t • ,,r'' 00K40 talldx.JuawIOM.IJI Rol yua+11 I• ulp.y ,...,y / 'uilulyn ►toss NI uq NI ul aI n, aS/♦Y1 -aie.,J...,.., 14 1 41N1y �'•�4. . ..; -- 'Limi'Jaytua 's,lo,GPP42141P.100 1 ,, • Iuxuru lion stye in pauo1lueu,e.•n pue �� �'1�) lL•x pup tuawnl l)ul•lyt)Inaa.a\of pazuoytnr Slim ays I.yI rarer•ptln IM•peee.. (l oiiJnd MO I.N�(I•Iunpn pu/"i+al et'OI 11 palpelJlotltl 'oily I-1',Agin 14I aauaptaa Llnlx1111et mini JO nulu!I Jim dual J.Ilun)I put fatuu.M ,sl)<)Cl.ln iyl K•sumd None pruo.i we dry ry n puuoytn.ua«Lo1111.y1Pa1.11ylenu0 Pug Lrlsnpi pwluawnilionll wrywtu)el•1►1!'uwu•J(l ulNLxrtnan.L wria4 t•w-l.. lu,in,).w.n ludn ■ uu.q aNeJ14) ilaouvueiuellwtiM 4Jo•L �' � aIV'r.itaV\fs+eWtl'ue11W�hr'yN))/111 awallua LJol.npnle.a\ri Joa(w)Illetll,(Iru»,igolnll ( Iuf71 JO,4ullo0 ( NOLONII ISVM d0 FLLVJS *I,w/ul.n,1 Auh/p'dlyivauu•,I Iuwx,)undnlynM• slalom Juror•baLVD(XSV a7VIntrU.FINV 1 LLVC)01,'sv il:)vaaill.limy-1 to J.uued•n Puy tilw)ppupul tlt4tt Jotu•JD 41"a -- ii II 1 Jl7NVN i 07avii(1,1.'a vN1,N to km* 7. P 7 y 00Jv 1CQL • ..rl j7 i /' `/ Jt ' ^V J1srMu,l(Iunn;)1tny panwra(1( W 01'M rIM1111 Jo atn.a eyI jo anit.lunuJ_,1^w ud n u• .n "JJ)9 ZO10.1•1 C ~LII P'^r1" nI.l�Ir V„ r i )r\ ,I ' ) T_T `' r7 r-;�; :, �1" \ �INFDn,X nv Q / »l 777000, a1 , f,,, �V; rr rs'rvNvt v N........,(TJ:)7K-- L. 41461'(Jmlwa,oN :pa$v j 'I(rilna 8 Al(VO (1",IA011JJV UNV ail.1 33.)V wlrwe pus u ray'nvinuaeatdai trial,u,Maum)Iey1 votuuU 641 LO rau n Au.11wJ lurup(pe Ns jo sluaudolanap 44I1')11I1111 IIU,AuUAL1144/•urso'101.0 lutsliv'ly1:n(Lga(t01t3A.wlplelluMtNauW/oIlIUad•JJo grow tdlwep'1P111W)P'IwfIa'IIUw. .n )n ewn ei'elbow,4II.Iup u H WOJ 1pul Jo 403.l .(p •..00 ul Hwy farm tar pus tl!W'/Nlleluafa w ldal MN'ti •aaans£p W l'•N W IJ D nu, 'a ',It' .... .. r.l'v Z M DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 1 1 1998 TAMARON POINTE PROJECT DESCRIPTION RECEIVED ' �'�� ��' Tamaron Pointe abuts Lake Washington Blvd. between N 24th street and N 20th street. The site is zoned RM-1,and contains 10.69 acres with approximately 9.08 developable acres,which will allow 182 dwelling units. There are 1.6 acres of steep slope that will be left untouched. The steep slope areas that lay between the project development and Lake Washington Boulevard will be enhanced with additional landscaping. The proposed development plan shows 182 units in 17 buildings,with interior drives in similar locations as the existing park, and access drives to Lake Washington Blvd. in the same location as existing ones. Interior pedestrian walks are provided from all units that connect to a pedestrian link to Gene Coulon Park. Tamaron Pointe is currently developed as Lake Terrace Mobile Home park,which is a mobile home park that contains 92 mobile homes and a manager's home and office. All residents of the park will be moved prior to any development activities. Trammell Crow Residential(TCR)has hired a relocation consultant to assist the residents during the transition. The consultant will provide services such as coordinating moves to alternative housing and guiding residents through the State of Washington relocation assistance program, which provides reimbursement for relocation costs. The mobile homes are parked on concrete pads and each has paved driveways and parking. All of the existing structures and mobile homes will be removed. As part of Tamaron Pointe's development submittals, TCR is requesting a modification to have the garage parking of the townhomes count towards meeting the City of Renton's parking requirements. Parking for 372 cars is provided on site,with 144 garages, 10 handicap stalls,47 compact stalls, and 177 regular open stall. The required parking is 319 cars, or 1.75 cars/DU, and the parking provided of 372 cars is 2.05 cars per DU. As part of the proponent's evaluation of the site's development potential, a Technical information report, a geotechnical report and a traffic analysis report have been prepared and made part of this application. The following provides an overview of these studies: Technical Report: The existing on-site drainage system except for a small area near the northwest corner of the site,routes the drainage southward to the southwest corner of the site along Lake Washington Blvd. where an existing drainage system conveys the flow under Lake Washington Blvd. westward through Gene Coulon Park, discharging into Lake Washington. The distance from Lake Washington Boulevard to the discharge point in the lake is approximately 410 feet. The proposed multi-family apartment complex will have roughly the same percentage of impervious area as the existing site. The downstream drainage system piping with the exception of one 60-foot length of storm pipe is adequate to convey the developed flow to Lake Washington. No on-site storm detention facilities are proposed. The inadequate section of downstream piping is proposed to be upgraded from a 12- inch to 24-inch pipe. A bio-swale is proposed to treat the 2-year,24-hour storm event prior to discharge into the downstream drainage system. The site is served by existing sewer,water, and power located on Lake Washington Blvd. A significant amount of fill is located this site. Assuming that much of the fill can be overescavated and reused,the amount of additional fill material that is needed is approximately 10,000 cubic yards. F:UULI\TAMARON\NARRATI V.TAM In the current development submittal, TCR has not included a Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Plan. The site has previously been cleared for the development of the mobile home park and no trees or vegetation will be removed except that which may be considered a garden or minimal landscaping for individual mobile homes. No trees with a 6" or larger caliper at chest level exist on-site. Geotechnical Report: Geotechnical Consultants,Inc.,evaluated the development site for geotechnical conditions. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with a total of 12 test borings that encountered dense to very dense, native sands. The native soils were overlain by a substantial thickness of fill in the western borings, and one boring located in the southeastern portion of the site. Conventional footings can be used for the buildings where competent soils are near the planned escavation elevations. Deep foundations, such as augercaust piers or driven pipe piles,will likely be needed where deep fill is present. Shoreline Elements: Approximately 2070 feet of the development site lay within 200 feet of the shoreline of Lake Washington thus requiring a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This area which lays infront of Building three, extends 90'along the west edge of the site and is approximately 23'wide(see attached map). There are no structures and/or residential units off site(existing or potential)which will have views obstructed as a result of the proposed project. As part of the development proposal all existing structures on-site will be removed. There will be newly built residential units with obstructed or limited views of Lake Washington. The estimated construction cost of the proposed project is approximately$14,500,000. The fair market value is estimated to be approximately$27,000,000. Traffic Analysis Report: Transportation Planning&Engineering,Inc.prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis,which indicates that the proposed project will generate approximately 62 new PM peak hour vehicle trips. An average weekday would generate approximately 624 new vehicle trips. This report uses existing traffic data collected at the pertinent street intersection and roads identified for analysis. Level of service analyses were performed for existing and projected future traffic volumes, using the collected traffic data, for the without project condition. The evaluation of the traffic impact of the proposed project, included adding project generated traffic to the future traffic volume projection and calculating the level of service. The with project traffic operations were then compared to the without project operations. The comparison of traffic operations with and without the project identified that the project will not cause a significant adverse affect on the operation of any of the study intersections. Architectural Elements: The proposed project site plan has been designed to meet applicable City of Renton regulations and standards. Two of the buildings are garden type with apartment flats,and fifteen are three story town homes. The town homes have garages on the ground floor,with living space on the upper floors. There is also a leasing office/recreation building with an outdoor swimming pool and patio and tot lot. There are two access drives on Lake Washington Blvd.,one at the southerly part of the property and one towards the north end. There are dual interior drives that circulate traffic north and south between the access drives. The building types and heights are attached to the narrative as exhibit A. F:VULI\TAMARON\NARRATI V.TAM Aug- 10-98 12 : 15P Rutic-"le Maul Architects 20F -62-4381 P . 02 • Tamaron Pointe Building Heights: Height (average grade No Type # of units Stories to midpoint of roof.) 1 E 10 townhouses 3 34'-0" 2 D 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 3 C 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 4 B 6 townhouses 3 34'-0" 5 E 10 townhouses 3 34'-0" 6 D 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 7 C 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 8 A 28 flats 3+basement 40'-10" 9 C 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 10 D 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 11 C 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 12 E 10 townhouses 3 34'-0" 13 C 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 14 A 28 flats 3+basement 40'-10" 15 C 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" 16 F 10 townhouses 3 34'-0" 17 C 8 townhouses 3 34'-0" Rec Bldg 1 16'-3" ,.,,\,Q,440. .„ oitesol*mr.i.o, g , difre.# 4P, " IA.,....,ediAtiNt 'el ' .ii: Atkk. 4.. Ci !!!! •• •err y.,1'SVi`!r�r`"yk + , ° ;5411111()\44 1 Pr I ic) „.,W kg0 6 41, O. r, are,,,,Ii.., ,-- 4.-,w,L;,..we4.00, . ' VI4 ,14" 13.•: • 4 ,,,c5 i S. ii.„VA4e,,,;:41::":44,41,0.e.,,,60, c .0` Nk. . ‘ ds 4- # •4.-;-- ,1 • **%. ,, "Nit •'J�A ♦ Iii I•.?). `,� .Zr'.•!,./ ' 1!+'...5�, ,,,. it .. C % :c�•`may, i ••<1 ��"ef',;-','N;w r} 'f�i+�' 98 1 r'h! 7'':=3'0•1' 1• NEW � � �. S'' �� 4x.,,;t>rr.;��..�-.•y:tN r�,�‘'.`',�,a•,�� STREET WIDENING, '24„..e,,,i,.,........-.,.+-,,ts4‘.w.t(.,!114,i,,..,i,l;v4li.v1,.:"„..y 1tp.0.,i.!...4e4r42(.,e,:4',i 51v.0.,p. .2 •j� 4�r �♦. 7���/� `: . . s x,r kfr.,,�y�'� 3 CUM, GUTTER AND ,,, �`/I 1 `♦ 1p♦♦•�.'`I''.I ,. ;: 1+• . ' �r'i SIDEWALK. t : .ff "all ...!?;.:F:":. * ire.V.V. 12..t411- #•4/ .#00.V . 1.4 ' ..-. ' OWC6 4W.O.e If 1' '.-Ageilegili,/ ,I le‘ . ' .. . . r.a; 5h r �.,,,�c j'. j. •e A#1, A. , ArvA.-,4 P1e,e ",1„.1S,V.f,..0.,V-iw.'i.4/a*0l.•p-orra-i-I giw4,i4 lw.,„.N44:4..A11.pi„exI.1„M.,411.1.t1;4Pt1.,I � � ` /nH %''�i.1�•'�rSY tr0c,-:2Y Y.N' 1p, / , .-4 ile* 7 I frw . ,'� T r' �'\14 ,447,4 „„.00'i,-/.1*-ts ...0,,,, ,, co 12' cv ' `tea 1 . 0 Id" �di o �+rF re r x ` 3fa' f , W'Y`Ca !rr'S CJ`V 72 •. �^p' rt• R^ CJ, w. ;;. r 0.9 pt lit '',.,,,,'.7,...0"...4,4,r."-e- „. cv e„,‘ (Cr-Pi 1-li'e''( i-11(1.1--k4- -rq t'44-1‹) /AP*. ;45'' l5 fl i o + `�, ,�,,. SHORELINE EXISTING PAVEMENT ala, cv \. $6o6q 9 / e CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION FOR TAMARON POINTE 1. Proposed Construction Dates: Project Duration: 15 months Start of Construction: August 15, 1999 Project Completion: November 15, 2000 2. Hours of Operation Monday through Saturday: 7:00 A.M.to 7:00 P.M. 3. Proposed Hauling Transportation Routes Arterial Streets: Lake Washington Blvd.North Dr. Interstate Highway: I-405 I-5 I-90 4. Measures to be Implemented to Minimize. Dust: Use of Water Trucks during site work Street Sweeping/Cleaning 5. Traffic and Transportation Impacts Use of Arterial Streets and Highways vtor, -�J 1 iL'+'. •� Use of Designated parking areas. 1 _�' Rely Flagging as necessary AUG A ' 3 6. Erosion and Mud ReCei v LD Submittal of and adherence to erosion control plan Street Sweeping and cleaning as required Use of designated parking areas • 7. Other Noxious Characteristics: � 'C-�`!1� '� Onsite daily construction Supervision r% us:r 8. Specialty Hours Proposed for Construction Material Hauling c Hauling Hours: Same as hours of operation 9. Preliminary Traffic Control Plan See Attached F:JULI\TAMARON\CONSTRUC.NAR ,... . • r SEE 596 HAP 626 ,,,,.. — .„,,., a.... ® �_ 0i- 1. xT I "T"Z DEy '^ 1 1' W 5�� , '� t '�mlt-f iv�Ea �, •- II • 9 .' s3oo'�- 5 H ST a repo •. i., " 1 f t u�Ev , . I n,�. ` K o ���� r �pp a: - E'"a C a• li /• i A ■,M Pfart A. att El' m ;, +) tt ro r i "?f sE r }• .e4 At[T • �I 1 E (t i 3 P - 1, AEI Tz6o= TN r, '" D 'II" .;r+•'� , , ] ST R ! �' r '• s�• '' e I r* I INZEVLMUDO tF� r3ro r typ i ttPL �[F :r ��• 1 ,rST F,.>z,,, -+ n i 7, / ,�r ; tW..... a, �•R..� k:2: +CI.Us 1 Nr''',...,; r1 ,:a MID 1.4 � II.., 3 j� :de� ns• af�6M �� ly,n .. �rg a © g #tp C� 4l _at ,'r, ,,,, J,., e 1 NEIGISTLE ,/ s< % t.TM zsTH rL iC <' L A !p aY 'IwSE5 l.t ;ii, ewer A: ��/�' '''�. ,,,, Y-sTs m.St a' 7C ��3• �1 i_ (#A,rrSf :-.L. ....,.:::::";::sli:.;-''::::::,1-',' �. sue.,_ elan K na, raTMIAiA' \ alex � j ipp• _11600 a p F' l? A'Y Sl I r�. 139THAV`' • 2 1vo. III��1� � [j 14�is u.E1.1s-:�Ss$'i N - 44ply' c;c.,,,-„,,..„ _':t� Jr►��I' ... ^' L ., Y� �{r ill � 4 ,Y %II ::„ ,. es , E8 Rt� / NAOTM 5T �; sE'" r.sr — :4. �y^'ct' •F ' , 11 ueswK �1� _ f 4� 1 v f • �� b T�TI AVALON y N 3HR1 SST ., ift:— ttnn, .T - "j�" 'C's — S S. rn i'Y,_ ir �C�...• r iAlai! c •3 rn n,.,'S.ST �f e4 p L��1 1 "' 'Q 1: :.ii j1 ��?c* KEKNrOALE t a ( 3 7 \ '^� BEACH MARK 1 ' "JI�tJ a SE ST zz.' ...Ail' ��•",�• {� < < 1; SE 1 �S 5� \ 'Q.. 74TH i sr I ` i'Pl.es ti , I#:'llil "6 ar fit Pf^� +< J' gl b cram m 91ST STISE 91STU !i ' •'4339t i 33PD •: laoo( I '��'t'r 9 n d ,.122a3 ' .:�•.�h,„,7 IK3 n ' SE ' ,4.. T. • cEK.,.jlllI ?r11^.'.. T •1ST ST P CJrF•�Av i (11311 NE 31sT sr r a1. E .l'1A+.� c� f .'•7i# 4 5 SE .i ,.;.v' I - ®l i� ST r 1 MAY,wit» a n'`l sE ,, .-f '�..Sys' .� ;.;+r�+ '�3E • t� 's ` MAY VAl(EY ,. f s sG Y �^,�� 1uM5t 9VAu,aol4N 0 za c , T+o. 1\ w '';w: 1LAKE , \!. : t _ .3< �, �, ;� sr 1'vAaK zsTNTH crr f, N u ,.TM ' - �J r II E -M n .,;1 r• +E .1��' —�_r3 "'G rt SE n morn v� �� r •s' �7 -e 1111,13..751.,• �eu '< R' Gy Y. I..,a sr r ��`� <®� a0 VL St �;1oz10 s t!� , e 4 SHINGTOi`� , EN .s� : " •[rE . NEI C!«1 -y a € s io3Mn sr I H a GJ `� SE 10ATH r,s+' " :c.. A �.�/ I _ ,(11E 215T ail " \T 1 A00 r .z900 ST I le _ ,r,S i „ _2 i i G` s[hosni, i E let & �•,,,EOrx v 11 5 .,� `�� trrial s ' .».- 0r\,TH sr i sE 1osTM vL�_ S / I`'' � r' i M, �. 4a ? Al- SE .o6TH sT RaE . t 1 \..... I.:.. Fill 1 1 5 t ''+� QA r-^ -- '" ' so �r> -r g lolimw L76-k .E re.. i `� sE Tru ►L I k: ear uu, f:, zAao t/KSD R �'=soo ET`.:&r`<fir < 9 /~\ r �'o.'ga!1 �'� >t II N it IEB ari tat . s1.n \ s \ A ,►, �� �l v ; um N ST . nE 1H k; , n Y K�. W q�y '< �Pt\ 0.��� /` 6EalE yCOUId�N - - tz1.!9 f�Iti1 ST - ,n l�N ,`� QO i I q'b 6 � I WORM 9R, rNE 12TH sr NE . IZTN 1 ;w SE 11z ST st,m, 6 � � 112TH �\ M ..:. \ � � .: iliwittir.q. lu. „. R 1 d 3 G _i i1 H .. '300 tt m,R .II �I�I - �fi,� \vd1,//�A I ARK R TM ► rxt■■ EN& ,aExav . �'/ '1 �/ 9oa 0 c 1 _ `�7VK: ' ®' II EilI�� _ '„t sT � AtRPo�Ri4. i ` �`. _ ti �� , .— � i �.. ■!!!U• �1� 1' `r ' \ I ,� SE i`� C�ISL: i �F' ® �77 1 ��L�� �I 'u1�o St ua.ST I■ ' e7 iantli ri ' 'i gars \\ / \ w-IMoril,rmill ril _ � 7SIIfAN S . .• SE 110rp ST'I ' 1 s „ estal�� °'oo''., Ar IrAK► < a \� 2T'� i'' Ili :1'.4, g A/' o _ .. :MARI! f©��e� T / t' 1T7, 1� tq ii " , , {�- _ T1H 0 I i I S r '1z07H STI F.1l6� ST_ p1 CEaa —� s lzlsr�6� !1 Rim ,9ua pqIrk 4' sTa sE.1z1sr sr 1111 S1smnsr_ p r� _TRAfL < ., f R ■(ice �r - TTHsrsTR -I SEItzzro F HM 7TH St' , 4 A nH < 't 8 .A�t" a SS "?I sr TC R Juli A.Haynes TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL Legal Assistant West Coast Group 4010 Lake Washington Blvd.,N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland,WA 98033-7866 (425)828-3003 FAX(425)828-0904 DEV1r:! A'NiNJG August 10, 1998 an'OF KEN ION Jennifer Henning AUG 1 1 1998 City of Renton DECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Tamaron Pointe Dear Ms. Henning: The purpose of this letter is to request to exceed the parking requirements for our Tamaron Pointe project. The parking required is 319 cars,or 1.75 cars/DU,the parking that will be provided is 372 cars which is 2.05 cars per DU. I hope this modification is acceptable. Please contact John Wayland at (425) 828-3003 if you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, • r7� Juli Haynes cc: John Wayland Sincerely, Juli Haynes F:VULI\TAMARON\HENNING.LTR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations,such as zoning,shoreline,and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words"project," "applicant,"and"property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND: CITY OF F•—; 1. Name of the proposed project,if applicable: A UG ; ivy 3 Tamaron Pointe RECP �IVED 2. Name of applicant: Trammell Crow Residential 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 1 John Wayland Trammell Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. NE#320 Kirkland, WA 98033 (425)828-3003 4. Date checklist prepared: 07/22/98 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Development Services Division. 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Development of the 182 attached residential units and ancillary facilities would begin as soon as the City of Renton and other effected agencies have granted all necessary permits and the tenants of the Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park have been given the mandatory one year notice to terminate tenancy. The development would be constructed in one phase with potential occupancy in early 2000. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Report prepared by Geotech Consultants, dated June 29, 1998. Trip generation and Distribution Analysis prepared by Transportation Planning&Engineering dated June 16, 1998. Technical Information Report prepared by Pacific Engineering, dated July 21, 1998. Sensitive Slope Analysis prepared by Rutledge Maul Associates dated July 9, 1998, (See Sheet A2). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. SEPA Determination City of Renton Official Site Plan Approval City of Renton Clearing&Grading Permits City of Renton Storm Drainage Approval, City of Renton Utility permits City of Renton Building Permits City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit State of Washington Hydraulic Permit Application State of Washington 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) 2 The site is 10.69 acres with approximately 1350 ft of frontage on Lake Washington Blvd.North. The project will contain 182 apartment units in 17 buildings plus garages, carports, a leasing office, recreation building, swimming pool and tot lot. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address(if any), and section,township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Site Address: 2100 Lake Washington Blvd N. Renton, WA. See Attached for legal description& Vicinity Maps. Range: SEC. 5, TWP. 23NR. 5 S.E. W.M. 3 • LEGAL12.1?,51 CRIP TI CN.• (PER TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO. COMMITMENT NO. 867411 DATED 3-23-98) PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY OF THOSE COMMON BOUNDARY LINES AS ESTABLISHED IN THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT FILED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8509110605; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2: LOTS 39, 40 AND 41 OF ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 41 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1020457; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26, ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED . IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; • THENCE WEST 172 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; • THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 27, ELDON ACRES, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF C.D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, '.;t1- y; i';'- ,' 0111!04 . B 'Trt..:EA .i, ‘ ..,wt, , Lute, \,/ ' ST IAA 1. .`,. .,,.4.‘1.T.4-z:,-.Yo. N1 E -1:' Z !- sT .' SE:'-w-. le: ggriotsTri: -iglu-- _AA.,,, ( 1111 gill , • ,, EX i= Fs tOriovaill x m Mr k f ; C V I D %711:4 1111"3: SEE 596 w., 6 2 6 1/4,$ 4 - '' !',I .:.)1111-c :4'ir)-._. • ,---' '' ':.I c-4:;:#4' AT Mhr*L. . EA •,,,, ,,., P. -:.*.virefirk:s,,,.iist. ? ._ 'A ,,1 SE Tonik n 'q't-.- -t E D I kil,`.. ,v.f.l. -; ST ST 2: 1. .4 r;:tra••,' z. e 1; 4. ST_Lit,73_,„t_ - ' 715 ,T,LtP 1: ,,, ,... Pig ri _..,,,,, 4,4_. .4t, ,,,, 1 1 JE'....:•E 7 PT* ,tr,..,,,,,,,,,!,..P. ,--.• ii) - c' L. -7 :-: 1 isr 4. ,..sr , ST ' , "2/0711-1 1 o 1 r, r/ ;.- ' • P,,,K 0::,•.Z.se;•., =-'7I izosr , ST 17,,.7,,,,D .t. , ccPL ' 2/... , 601r ,,-, • 011 - ."- 4'. 4 Z ,'' 1 r• , -.7.•MIO 6 Wall.44-11 5' l' zi 1 / ir, .:.• i '7'. r, . ,+ ,......4.,:,;;• ,,w1 Ill'a•-"-4,s t, . • .UN St,, IC. 4.70,s, , '2 A .cus . SE 7dc. - ,,, E!., 4, ' se .., 4.-11sE:vc, . 4... /4,44 ,:s6 2:it , ,. xe, •:, - :,',:NEWCASTLE , -V..' i mt4 SE 7. H / ,., ,.' '? // ', ,. e-'' '-1 s• -1" SE 4,75TH PI ga v k '. a Xi,i(m. ST ,:r.I/ / ...;4( i NE h ..,, - _/. .r.,--7,7"-I a'f f,'''' tfiiii,,,.,. = nr" -- ,.., ,,',,,,94. ,t•-.- • . .'4"`.‘ - :<..c.-,1•4.. : 1,! - ,• k,‘ .,e.4, .,,,..•.... r::: ' ' Mii 7 Pi e S SE pp 11 twat/ ,-, a moo P, 4,8 0 , , ,,,,,litk, 4 _, .7., ...-..:1 , *4 1.8, 4,-% '' b.. - i'44,0 ' 're *6 . ,.11 a ... '.3 l istml • „PtIr 1 S6'0"5 6 sEris_4 NETNITS ., .0 , so fr ti, 1-•5( / . it:_.SE 2707. TT ST;116001E - ;-, -• ;TT .;.. . ....4 NE :.:-,7 .17,4,..: v 3.39T1H4:4eir 4._ 2 114 s. , , ',It. ..„.p . AcY ArP* I • ••.. SET 8 '6....,4"t.1‘.. -, P AY s . ...I , ,„,, , ,,,.. ..'. - &ow ..Z-SZ 70 • ,. 1 // •40TH sT =.- ... ,... y_:_...' ,y E ,. 4"13' 44„. - ' •:.,Ar s, ''-)• r i . .4.11-1"1 AvALos 4" • 1., - . A p 4 \ X 'r t "1441;Fr' S:G7 "%."1'1 5 E:'T'' R.:-E_K .5,„ - b , 1 , / d• _ 1 g PL Z 'S , ,. .r t':4,. •4 A, 1 IP ,..s. ‘4....i ..E.,.. I_SE.0.11N_NyL,,n1:: . 7.., :, . , ... ..,,,..04. ....,N,04,sillsT .t., 4,,„Itilk 'L." 34 36TH \JE , SE ,. . x ST t„ BEACH V( / AIM 3 ! - sNE - ArriWill g - 6V4#,,,,-.. , . [3 ir 34T. --.. sT ' . Yt. „ .., •,. - Sr',•••:•:' At'.% ' i' lis .. x SOV7H AO ow NT '• L_ .4i,,ii,s-,,,,;,,11;,•i•..,'',. $ ss. r„ p SE 91ST ST ST 1 ,SE 91ST ... 3316) ST I . ', .; , SE 1 ' rA 32•0 x - • J Cf!f-,E .' - !'A7'. -' ' 91ST ST , C:'-'AiEr,P 1 N 31ST si. t- ,- . r,..• ------,:1 3 SE I..' 'i 4 ij , =.. . trinrEm. ST 4i, -0 HAY NE .......'S:Pr' ....'S.7 ,( ::4TP7 .-9.2.0. RE'.,ESE: '''. i'P'.7T:P7:3-----'. N'':' -- ,lT 1 j'..-8,S_F ss:t.'-'.7":4,:- ,,, 1,4 At4v '1, r" ,•. , am.•••• -'-,-.,•• ,. --r-,•„sE= ,,,.-,',,,,..1-*:,..,,,,:,, .- . ,,II 1300 PT. e` '`• , ...-,--41,4RX ;• e,, ..' . ,--:. / . LLEy 7'. . '.. ''C'.. ...,•.; 96 i 11/80 V . - 4 0 ,..- ,. 4 , tn - . . ..-,...:,,,,,,,,i, = 961N-Pt.-- MTH PI- ... r i NE'TT' 28711 ST A \'.-1'` '..'' •%,. '' 0 - .. . _...,:ssE II:iii00:6H TV LED .-. -..4 Pr -' r - E 4 ' 3N I. "• ':.- .-11' IC --'..'•' 27TH ST .--3",::- L 1 s' / \ ILAKE , , 27111 2100 - mE .. ,..,`.,\ _z, •- i 0 SIERRA . I .•-•4:,, ,,.,., • ...t CT. -,T ,_ 14. ,,._ SE 9913,ST HEIGHTS 111115. Ji I% _.!, W ;PARK .-] N'''2,14 Tt NI r' t . S , '" 100ni A 1 is 29rN CT I:,! . :KELIIrs E it"..E4 At --RST' ... _.,6 ,w. 5L,T29c.. Zi °N Er2Etcp3PP 0:Si T; it. 1:17:: ,..sr 4 •pv,:-..-...H mu ,... Emu .,- 37.7 u.i , t)ASHINGTON NE,..., = 5 2;ty1.1:!: : Nil r 111411Pa. w . ' S I 14E ! EN' vy- 22ND ' 4.4 CZ §.1• 20" _ .t.T1 8 :22N5 iiST.: I ,os ... \,.,.,, .4. a tx s, 1., it .. 4s; s . m.3 ,.,,,sThi,. ST.:1111:.! I ' ( '2- . . E . _ . . . w 2300 , ' , P , ...- .r, Z -\ , . S TT 12 i'V' IN- •• •''' SP L SE ,06TH sr A NE V',/ a ..4. ;;;I '' --. SE 105TH i- sl . ‘T'T , CO , 1 -PARK w •• E•C .!•... ' tE ,4, ri'' "" wn' ft A •/.4. 14'?,_ .. .,-, i sT gi -L. ieN,,--, ,...$4, r.i , , 107TH PL ''›1 11T' "G BOA I LAU CH . ^ .i Enicil_ .w 'P .‘c4Pljzz'Y'INNSZI TS IS'E,,,2 9 1°1-'IPA-T:7STIV:, . . .: • .ft Imo • . •)1 11*-A:;,,,,* --. ,.....-:._• LI Amleid z ' §"MigIlk 25 3 1 z .' w (r-N, w 0_1'901 Se i, .e," 44 t-, '-•'' %,.;. - --,, igi4 NT . NE 3TN PL 9 „. 3, , ------- ',- ,i g 17TN ST g l K flet OS IT .Ck44 ' Ilik 11131NEta.,- 7, & g IPZI PP,€.4.1 1...694\ -7 glit :s* g 'ST ' 111 -112TH ''''.6ST ...' / SP'S 'Da-11DP ,..E a- 8 „...„,„./ 'NENise,401ALpil:,) DI-. NE ,-.1 12Th ..... ST NE ..ni N"'-- - 12TH r'aii ST - - au g. ;..k' i SE " ---ST'0 ‘Sni.S3 74 ,..,. ,,,,„ 6 :4, ---' zioo ' 3.--1.„,- ...., . . ..z, ,-. w 700 i st n N '- •.... - ,o.pmak /-/- `,„--....-111-cOrti,•,,'.ixr pp,564. ..1(1;4,-. Polif N14 ri. z im .1 ii111 ,k,,,g, m t si. 1 1 ., dim,. i, , ST ,... • inglikr AIRPORT •., 4t411111161 I zill E - - !'I Ling&a Ll MINN / ., 0.m... . , 111\ eidirp.All '7 nim :41"AI• .• \ . OK O4, I C""" ': :s1T4T:91- 1 7800 • • 1 -. IMMI1114114 1 ,,L GOEING ‘ ) ' r c..-1. .i 11Wviir, -winum s"' . NE 10n1 ST mLittirrarimr.:-,,. ....7. so 116114 Sfl o A, x MR PS00 9TH :.....si • 1 ,,, I,....,.., ... a . MKT ... T E.. --•--• &111Millitifitg" :11 r S ,120TH ST Milliala . _ m', - CEDAR ' ' N ' - .111elta HI ' kV , NEA.7, 7TH CT ' "'S insr lam > ,.' -,,,, RIVER gl.---1 11;1! '1 s_2-1 turn In ''"" 'E.,. '., ran. ' 1. < - . 4 - - IMO .4 7TH ST' ,7171 Pt R NE as ''c .,,, 121ST ST •.S s. W rim - mom ST' ..- c• - z.,,,. .,, fige, :_rel oimort 711,i1,STT,,a sT § ,T, ‘1,1E1122ND t am ,. .._., , ST 5.?' ' _ ..d. mmi . MEW,iiii .....`.1. • - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat\, rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 75% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Native soils consisting of silty sand with varying amounts of gravel d. Are there surface indications of history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 10,000 yards-On-site cut&fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Possible minor erosion during construction which will be controlled by a temporary erosion control plan per the City of Renton standards. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? Pre-Development: Impervious Area 207,582 SF Pervious Area 258,174 SF Total Site Area 465,756 SF (50.1%)Impervious Area 233,352 SF (49.9%)Pervious Area 232,404 SF h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: Temporary erosion control plan during construction, site drainage plan, and landscaping. 4 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and equipment fumes during construction and vehicle exhaust fumes after construction. Quantities unknown. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: Water will be used during construction to control dust. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Lake Washington parallels the site on the West side of Lake Washington Blvd. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Yes, approximately 1,500 SF is within the 200 Foot Ordinary high water mark setback of Lake Washington. A Shorelines Permit Application will be made following a SEPA determination. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 5 No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage:industrial,containing the following chemicals . . .;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Onsite surface water will be collected and conveyed through a series of interconnected catchbasins and yard drains. Flow will be directed to the south end of site to be bio-filtrated prior to discharging to public system in Lake Washington Blvd. through Gene Coulon Park discharging to Lake Washington. See also the Preliminary Technical Information Report,prepared by Pacific Engineering. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Bio filtration of runoff prior to discharge. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous trees:d r2inaple,.Otto own od Evergreen tree : f r S¢rups Wet soil plants:cattail,buttercup,bulrush,skunk cabbage,other b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Vegetation on the steep slopes to the east of the development will remain unchanged. Rockrose, Wildrose, Staghorn Sumac and Snowberry will be planted on the steep slopes fronting Lake Washington Blvd. 6 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: Douglas fir,Western Red Cedar,Coast Redwood,Vine Maple,Red Osier Dogwood, Western Hazelnut,Oregon Grape, Wax Myrlte,Mock Orange,Falanering Current, Wild Rose,Snoberry,Evergreen Huckelberry,Salal,Creeping Mahonia. 5. Animals a. Circle any bird and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site,if any: Birds:hawks,heron,eagle„songbirds,/ Mammals:deer,bear,elk,beaver,rodents,mountain_beaver. Fish: salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a mitigation route? If so,explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Apartment units will be heated electrically and the recreation building and pool will be heated with gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: The proposed structures will meet all applicable energy code requirements. 7. Environmental Health 7 a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required other than standard fire,police and emergency medical services. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: None needed. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment,operation,other)? Air traffic from Renton Airport. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. On a short term basis,general construction noise will occur between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Long term noise levels are not anticipated to exceed these typically associated for such developments. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: None needed 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently developed as Lake Terrace mobile home park, with 92 mobile homes and associated drives,parking, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. 92 mobile homes with some small, associated storage sheds, one single family home, management office and laundry room. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? 8 • Yes. Small storage sheds., single family home, management office and laundry room. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Residential-Multi Family-Infill(RM-1) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential-Multi Family Infill(RM-1) g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Residential-Multi Family-Infill. RM-I h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes,steep slope areas(see survey) I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 492 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 210 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: TCR will be working with owners of other mobile home parks in assisting the relocation of tenants as well as making available to all tenants the information to claim State of Washington relocation assistance, which provides for reimbursement of actual relocation costs. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: The project will comply with all applicable codes and laws and is compatible with the uses that surround to site. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. 182 middle to high income multi family units. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. 9 92 low to middle income mobile home units will be relocated or eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,in any: The project will provide 182 new, middle income dwelling units. In addition, adherence to existing zoning will ensure that the housing development is consistent with policies in the applicable land use plan. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? Buildings will be predominately 3 story, with a max height of 35 ft. Two buildings will be 3 stories plus a basement and will be an average height of 41 feet. The buildings will be sheathed in a variety of wood materials and trim. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: The buildings will have a variety ofshapes, and siding materials and color. The site will have significant landscaping and open space. All parking will be shielded from the public right-of-way, with most of the unit parking being provided within the units, minimizing the amount of exposed parking. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Only normal light from apartment units and recreation facilities. The development will provide lighting in the parking areas and strategically lcated throughout the development for nighttime security. Site lighting will comply with applicable codes regarding of-site lighting projection. b. Could light or glare from the fmished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? none d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: Lights will be hooded where possible to direct light on-site for security while minimizing off-site glare. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 10 Walking, jogging, biking, swimming, and boating (the site is adjacent to Gene Coulon Park). b. Would the project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: A recreation building with exercise facility, lounge and restrooms will be provided. The site will also contain a swimming pool, tot lot, and path, which will connect to the adjacent park/bike path 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence or historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: None Needed 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Lake Washington Blvd.North. The two existing access drives will remain in use for site access. The internal vehicle circulation will be within private drive lanes that provide direct access to parking areas b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? According to the Metro Transit System Map September 1997, the nearest transit service is located on N. 30th St.North of the subject site. The route serving N. 30th St. is#105. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 372 new spaces, with approximately 150 eliminated in the existing mobile home park. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). 11 Curb, gutter and sidewalk will be required along property frontage of Lake Washington Boulevard Subject to the City of Renton review. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so,generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Tamaron Pointe is expected to generate 1,226 average weekday trips. It is anticipated that the peak volumes will occur during the morning and evening commutes with 94 trips occurring in the AM peak hours and 117 trips occurring in the PM peak hours. For more information,please refer to Transportation Report prepared by Transportation Planning& Engineering, Inc. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: Mitigation fees and impact mitigation will be met. 12 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. The occupants of the 182 units will proportionatelyincrease demand for public services typical of a residential development of this nature. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. The project will be designed and constructed with adequate water pressure,properly located fire hydrants and a private street constructed to allow adequate access for aid,fire and police protection vehicles. Increased property valuation will result in increased taxes generated to support public services. In addition the applicant will pay all mitigation fees as required by City of Renton. 16. Utilities - a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: lectrici natura(eas water,'}efuse service, tele hone sanitary sewer,septic system,other. �� ��' Cable b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Puget Sound Energy will be providing Gas and electricity to the site. Existing power lines along frontage will be placed underground except for the high voltage(115KV) power lines, which will remain above ground on existing poles. Telephone service to be provided by U.S. West. Cable by TCI. Water and Sewer service by the City of Renton. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: '- r id' .., i-hri....- Date Submitted: g - - C7 S 13 D. Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity of at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. I. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air; production,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy or natural resources? 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,wetlands,flood plains,or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 14 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: 7. Identify, if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 15 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST 4012 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033-7866 Transportation Planning & Engineering , Inc. 2101 • 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 455.5320 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST 4011 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033-7866 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th Ave. N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone - (425) 455-5320 FAX - (425) 453-7180 June 16, 1998 o f wnsyl4c,rt, ti I ' % �FCISiER��• 6(/6/9cP [EXPIRES 4131,00 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th AVENUE N E .SUITE 110- BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON TELEPHONE(425)45! iR H BISHOP P E President FACSIMILE(425)453-7180 /ID 11 ENGER,PC Vice President June 16, 1998 • Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033-7866 Re: Tamaron Pointe Apartments — Renton Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Waylnad We are pleased to present this traffic impact analysis for the proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments project consisting of 182 apartment units. This project will replace 92 mobile homes that currently exist on the subject site. The project is located south of Burnett Ave. N. on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. in the City of Renton. We have visited the project site and surrounding with street network, and have based the scope of this analysis on a telephone conversation with Mr. Clint Morgan of the City of Renton. Based on our telephone conversation, the following intersections were identified for analysis. Burnett Ave. N./Lk. Washington Blvd. N. Site Driveway/Lk. Washington Blvd. N. The summary, conclusions and recommendations begin on page 6 of this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the site and the surrounding street network. Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by RMA dated June 9, 1998. The plan consists of 182 apartment units, leasing office, 372 parking stalls and two accesses onto Lake Washington Blvd. North. Both these accesses exist. Full development of the Tamaron Pointe Apartments project is expected to occur by 2000; therefore, 2000 is used as the horizon year for the purposes of this study. R067498Rpf Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 2 — EXISTING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS The project site is developed. This development consists of 92 mobile homes, internal circulation, parking and two access driveways onto the adjacent street system. Street Facilities Figure 3 shows existing traffic control, number of street lanes, number of approach lanes at intersections, and other pertinent information. The primary streets within the study area are classified in the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: SR 405 Freeway N.E. Park Dr. Major Arterial Lake Washington Blvd. N. Secondary Arterial N. 30th Street Secondary Arterial Burnett Ave. N. Collector Arterial Lake Washington Blvd. N. in the vicinity of the project site is a 2-lane secondary arterial street with paved bicycle lanes on both sides. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. Intersections along the corridor are controlled by stop signs. A number of these intersections are all way stop control. Based on the criteria contained in section "2B-4 Stop Sign (R1-1)" in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) many of these stop signs appear unwarranted. The MUTCD specifically states "STOP signs should not be used for speed control". Further unwarranted stop signs breed disrespect by motorists. Transit Facilities Metro Transit is the transit agency which serves the study area. According to the Metro Transit System Map, September, 1997 the nearest transit service is located on N. 30th St., north of the subject site. The route serving N. 30th St. is #105. Also N. 30th St. is within a DART service area. R067498Rpt Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 3 — EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Figure 4 shows existing PM peak hour traffic volumes at pertinent intersection and streets affected by site-generated traffic. Level of Service Analysis Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic flow, and the perception of these conditions by drivers or passengers. These conditions include factors such as speed, delay, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Levels of service are given letter designations, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions (free flow, little delay) and LOS F the worst (congestion, long delays). Generally, LOS A and B are high, LOS C and D are moderate, and LOS E and F are low. Table 1 shows calculated levels of service (LOS) for existing conditions at the pertinent street intersections. The LOS were calculated using the procedures in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209 3rd Edition updated 1994. The LOS shown indicate overall intersection operation. At intersections, LOS is determined by the calculated average delay per vehicle. The LOS and corresponding average delay in seconds are as follows: TYPE OF A B C D E F INTERSECTION Signalized <5.0 >5.0 and >15.0 and >25.0 and >40.0 and >60.0 <15.0 <25.0 <40.0 <60.0 Stop Sign Control <5.0 >5 and >10 and >20 and >30 and >45 <10 < 20 < 30 < 45 The intersection LOS is an average for every vehicle entering the intersection. On occasion specific movements, such as stop sign controlled left turn movements, experience significantly worse LOS than other movements at the intersection. When this is the case other factors such as safety can be considered when determining whether improvements are warranted. R067498Rpf Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 4 — Accident History Traffic accident data was obtained from the City for the period from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1997 on Lake Washington Blvd. N. in the vicinity of the subject site. The City data does not identify any recorded accidents at the Lake Washington Blvd. N./Burnett Ave. N. intersection and only one on Lake Washington Blvd. W. between Burnett Ave. N. and 13th St. North. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT Figure 5 shows projected 2000 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the project. These volumes include the 1998 traffic volume counts plus background growth. The assumed background traffic growth factor used in this report is 5% per year. This rate is conservative. The area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited. Table 1 shows calculated LOS for 2000 conditions without the project at the pertinent street intersections. In general, the LOS will remain the same as the existing conditions with small increases in average vehicle delay due to background traffic volume growth. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. The proposed 182 Unit Tamaron Pointe Apartment project is expected to generate the vehicular trips during an average weekday and during the street traffic peak hours as shown in Table 2. Also shown on Table 2 is the calculated trip generation for the existing 92 mobile homes on the subject site. The trip generation is calculated using the trip equations found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, for Apartment and Mobile Home Park (ITE Land Use Codes 220 and 240, respectively). The trip equations were used rather than the trip rates based on the ITE procedure for determining which method is most appropriate for a given set of data. The trip generation values above account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle trips. R067498Rpt Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 5 — Figure 6 shows the estimated trip distribution and the calculated site-generated traffic volumes. The distribution is based on the characteristics of the street network, existing traffic volume patterns, the location of likely trip origins and destinations (employment, shopping, social and recreational opportunities), expected travel times and on information contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Figure 7 shows the projected 2000 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project. The site-generated PM peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figure 6 were added to the projected background traffic volumes shown on Figure 5 to obtain the Figure 7 volumes. Table 1 shows calculated LOS for 2000 with project conditions at the pertinent street intersections. Both analysis intersections are calculated to operate on good LOS conditions overall. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS The City's Comprehensive Plan establishes a Citywide traffic impact mitigation fee rate of $75.00 per average weekday trip. The fee rate was developed as documented in the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee Support Document, and adopted with resolution no. 3100 and ordinance no. 4527. The fee rate is based on developers paying their fair share (9%) of a 20-year transportation improvement program costing $134,000,000. The Comprehensive Plan states that in addition to the fee, there may be site- specific improvements required by the City to mitigate on-site and adjacent facility impacts. However, on-site and adjacent facility impacts are not defined. The Comprehensive Plan also states that a development may qualify for a reduction of the $75.00 per vehicle trip mitigation fee through certain credits for development incentives, construction of needed transportation improvements (arterial, HOV and transit), through public/private partnerships, and transportation demand management. Specific credits and the amount of the reduction in the mitigation trip rate fee that could result from such credits will be determined on a case by case basis during the development permitting process. R067498Rpt 11R Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 6 — SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report uses existing traffic data collected at the pertinent street intersection and roads identified for analysis. Level of service analyses were performed for existing and projected future traffic volumes, using the collected traffic data, for the without project condition. The evaluation of the traffic impact of the proposed project, included adding project generated traffic to the future traffic volume projection and calculating the level of service. The with project traffic operations were then compared to the without project operations. The comparison of traffic operations with and without the project identified that the project will not cause a significant adverse affect on the operation of any of the study intersections. Based on our analysis the Tamaron Pointe Apartment project should be approved with the following traffic mitigation measures: 1. The developer should offer to pay a traffic impact mitigation fee calculated as follows: ($75.00 per AWDT) X (624 AWDT) = $46,800.00. 2. Construct the subject project in accordance with applicable requirements. These requirements may include street lighting, underground existing utilities and frontage improvements. No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. If you have any questions please call me. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Mark J. J bs, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer MJJ:es R067498Rpt TABLE 1 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY EXISTING PROJECTED PROJECTED INTERSECTION 2000 W/O 2000 W/ PROJECT PROJECT Burnett Ave. N./ Lake Washington Blvd. N. Overall A (3.5) A (4.0) A (4.4) Site Driveway/ WB -- -- B (5.3) Lake Washington Blvd. N. Overall -- -- A (0.6) R067498.Rpt 1111 TABLE 2 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRIP GENERATION TRIPS TRIPS EXITING DRIVEWAY TIME PERIOD TRIP EQUATION ENTERING TOTAL Proposed Apartment (ITE Land Use 220; 182 Units) Average Weekday T = 5.994(X) + 613 613 1,226 134.114 (50%) (50%) AM Peak Hour T = 0.497(X) + 15 79 94 3.238 (16%) (84%) PM Peak Hour T = 0.541(X) + 78 39 117 18.743 (67%) (33%) Existing Mobile Homes (ITE Land Use 240; 92 Units) Average Weekday T = 3.274(X) + 301 301 602 300.84 (50%) (50%) AM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.577 10 38 48 Ln(X) + 1.259 (21%) (79%) PM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.897 34 21 55 Ln(X) + 0.044 (62%) (38%) Net New (Proposed - Existing) Average Weekday -- 312 312 624 AM Peak Hour -- 5 41 46 PM Peak Hour -- 44 18 62 T = Trips X = 1,000 sq. ft. R067498.Rpt I ' ` SE'-7+ 68111 c, .,.. ';E1 N..,:I_• a •^1 5 W y, Wilkt.�..1,,nT .. s: H ST x ! SE rs 69 ' . ° +3r^+ ;'r i•-7 1 m 1 r I .,,u;tx < 1 iitnc, , r-- o--- i, C ? i�;'- GIry'Y7r�'.. A ,•, sT 7i,._ S, _ �i, :„ nsr,F� gN%2,9 A. SE°2 D ns Y Nr. v,i7::r, ="t �� z...5. r,r: RR re •s[ »o r ,o <' T PL SC 27- 801f,�,n�:5K��.. / + y' a 'T I .l".r1'':�S•a :.RD RL. ~T_ 'its so p C" SI 7 \'` A I .ti„ :::4..•t / d 1 s `-------- sc tim v7T ( ST y f r .• i T" 3� 4 ,, , S rj,E 1 ss TATMr :.AT I• Ir ' �.''•..14NIrep E �M• ``w s-7s'1 u)n'b 1= .''YA . it `J/ .,J,•,; • - MEIAS/11 ' I�9' I1 tl'E :�•.'Mier+yt reM Tr mxr pS�c st�,x \ J CF iM� I , Sr I it�I• 1 M I� i RI, ! l'$�i 1..`• ,...7.., •,'..-. .4�J! ..4`1nN ri- NI 43'.' :SE— BOTH s, Sl f. PL '11200 /11600 c 1C:1 ,,- it`Jlr;Sr3` Y1;1 �,1. MEN AY \` le,„E.1` ,(,f/,[ O,' I 3 I\7.�Y`/I., it K y ` �'K ` (, Y 7g1N R fir. y-' ` � t s, IUD s. \ i( l� Y r!„'�'' i"L 6aR+` "JF •JC,•. -rii.:i N I V I MA'Y \. I u en°i =l`< r .41 , q >+' `\ xt, \./'" ,r. N.81H ST t .,' 1•//e I St-" toy s, I �x I < F L u e,4 S-Iy .tT! _.... ---SI \c '.. 1000= —v �'i',k;r /st esl=o: I : 4S - •� : '1 as 7� ��„ C s[M,x l� fE es1N E' a f Y,1 I •`41. _ N 38TH sT "'. <$ Gy I`. EI. ,� ., - 1. •.,t ,, ,,'';I nt+�i.A Jambe fr, -�I;.r._SL fin. m•=v .,�f �! TWI3 4 II - �\�. .7 x.•D.�! — ST '' •- NE MTH `sr SC MTH' IEP"'Si ~ �-' Ni,N g 36TH ,1 .��� (` !(',;.'rA,r j. 3G ` ST !_ ,i- 11600 19 9' '`1 69 '6' 35TH Si I t'Q "'''N,1 ,�':h 'ISF 89TH ST 'IA b�xc - �4."W".6, �.1° •�,r ,1< J um i ST K1 <J,"Y !J, i W, .Mi T' .1 z1 r 33xn PL o!'' �•. .l L-1 sE 9.4, : I� s''. ` g o ° l\\� ail f $g SE 91ST ST'i SE 91ST ST y J. .ssp� • x 33RD ST A ti 11000 ti.( p 12200 �n . r, SC ^I �' 1 �, 92ND ST v,^2 T- _ 91ST ST N 315T ST IN �.4:^•.t- NE 31ST sT j .<lgr •31THtt 1 SE_ , : 3N 29TAA • •44 ?A .f&vit : T.''t • 9511 r:stro0 I __ o d 1_-IA EEY RD illil'' N 28TH PL .n. [5 c `;'la sm s '� 0 f.A• -- - - .,T. ---— - 1' ' _— _ ` �� w'-T�-- 1s ie▪'" _sr ' ;a 1 F- �°^ ' 4 TL.iI, PliO° g,Th--- ?i1�i 5-T . ' '- _��;E r..l�.�"` Eli I, I Z ,/ � MO , .. SIERRA - Iv 6.,. _J. ` R '... Sy 1. '1 ="'-s NCIG'Ti5 i ■.n. +'\• e .•e _ .Li.;r -!TKE er' E 1' s, 1LT! " `Ytl±oo,. ST. P,,R7 .o2STN� R • ,TH E, _ }`J ' NC 2)! LIONS - y+i.,n 4n 7 -4 /EIa ,.• sE'loo,H M1 s' •, Li NTH 1ST . , J re y NL r E.T.' A AP =--a'--•o—�J- K N (�yf i• )1 i NE .NE, PL r ; - - S! —102N0 I 1 s,. r[ ''u - axo IC y, I LI 6T2 n rN� , .5* 21ST LgI.l i, t -2QTH R Z trs < n - _S[•:es 1 NE a i3 . t1Aiw 1 . " um ,m 4.„ u.u. . le zTro R /���pTM e. b �`• ;:� 1_'SE Ea6TN's 1"NE \9rn ST .. !L c 5` ' LICCO A QQ : • ( i — W PAAi"'TV 5' r /`• � �R '{A R' i _--- A ' ' 7''' ,^ < Iilw J. �E • �I s - Vnn't \ NE ST �.'�:r g .:._ G Nt .' '1 ' -- s ,�. .= i..,, ■yEyp' �1: SUNSET ";�■iA T i `1 - tt ; .,..'L UA'CH r... i Y I - W WIN PLL21 "Lts' \\ ♦ < i Fr1 Y VP—' 1- = s z 11 'S MN`I SI i ;OM 3TI1 n Q ID Fi�.*t a ml sr U \ 1 j 14 MI �`=- 8 £S sxs / GCNE CMaN w '.c um J ' - <Qve,A ' i;'_ WORM �I� 1 ®I NE e i t1�'s 12TH d ST _ I ..,-` I� � . eEAOI PAKK 1 NE 12TH 3-ST t ` , SE 1121 \ NE,I cr 21Eo rgi. gssao A0 "rf. ro0;1 ,1, R• .le Tao .un, 3 otJATS N ... \,.,'.I/ - II PAR - _OR 1 ef` EWE- 1.,l, . ,,.. ,I,x+�SE: N�eN _ / �t,� 2-rE"TM _ ` < =C 1an ,i oro 9 T n ® l q mei !i^ I>,— I l ,"' VW ,, ,♦ m NE loi, ST w' •w. t �i,..r, AE ' ,UCO- Vi/ : n \� NE 9TH PL �. TT�; .'•ST �L / 2 ® _ = 51 r o �'KIWk1= sr s:rx SJ..-- i i-IV;— ZIT N :TH ST L NIGKAaT .' r ' 7TN LT p 1 - "T p I I), /A6K NE pp0,.,�� Si4 NE n§ I �T`sC INS, .11 a. s ,/ W ., :■� u .TEST ..,,,l .�.3_,T_i77'1 2THIsr/, s=a- <,4 _a,. . ''\ °2 - C 7- s Ir Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS?. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS?. It Is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resole, without permission. All rights reserved." i r FIGURE VICINITY MAP (_ TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J / ` • ►� w...... T , ilk , \* i... , : N . �.,; ,�►, 1111 lii00° \ se : ,= A 0 4II ,,,„I.•.0- 3 ‘."-- -Ito 1r ..... ‘01-- yo ,0 ,.::.::.....:-. . . .,;.::0.:.,...,:,.... . .. • . .0,0 ., f. , .._ for 0 �1• • 1'.. ,,,�� * 1`'14'•`• W `�1ia .0 r,I'/,RIMI'v S.f•A.10:il 1'((4: rn 1„... .l..„,,,•C-S:::17:1f.f. 1AMARON POINIE APAR1MENTS j,, ! (-FIGURE SITE PLAN 1 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS / 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J J I Z N 30th St. c L A I Project Site 405 r O (D n N r r.- N 3 m "O G z . LEGEND N P o(( 0 Traffic Control Signal ei Stop Sign XX mph Posted Speed Limit 04$ --. Approach Lane & Direction XL Number of Roadway Lanes EXISTING CONDITIONS ^ 1FIGURE ^ TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS ( 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ) \ Z N 30th St. not to scale Tuesday 3 ( 6/2/98 • 16:00-17:00 .ar , a rl ,.>N1/4••• N\`.> 8 404 1� Project Site 405 0 CD 0 S I 5 L0 fi 0 CO G 0- z O(. Pp<I LEGEND X--0. PM Peak Hour Traffic Volum- & Direction Note: Peak period traffic volumes on Lake Washington Blvd. can be influenced by SR 405 operations �EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME FIGURE 1 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 2 I 1 N Z N 30th St. not to scale ai o c m 78 1/4".. \\,9 7A 7 � Project Site 405 a 0 O Ql a_ Z O(. N P f(k LEGEND ` X—► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction 7- PROJECTED 2000 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME � (-FIGURE WITHOUT PROJECT TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I Z N 30th St. ai N �itg m <S ft •,bg -.9 (40 22\1/41 co- Project Site �\ ° 405 0 CD 0 N PROJECT TRAFFIC (NET NEW) i° Daily (706) ° PM Peak m 44 Enter 18 Exit P°6( rFIGURE ( PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES & DISTRIBUTION TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ( Z N 30th St. A not to scale ai , ( > N L of JCCD 4111) Project Site 405 a co \. uz* t94.0 G a. z LEGEND X--► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & irection * Turning traffic volumes at site riveway does not deduct existing volume r PROJECTED 2000 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME [1 - FIGURE WITH PROJECT f TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Q HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLEX.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) LK WASHINGTON BLVD (E-W) BURNETT AVE NORTH Analyst MJJ Date of Analysis 6/4/98 Other Information EXISTING All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRLIRLIRLIR No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 ) 1 ( 0 0 1 ( 0 0 ) 1 0 Volumes 54 0 0 128 72 3 171 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet ER WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 57 0 3 RT Flow Rate 0 76 0 Approach Flow Rate 57 211 183 Proportion LT 1.00 0.00 0.02 Proportion RT 0.00 0.36 0.00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 183 211 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 394 57 57 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.47 0.41 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.00 0.41 0.47 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 0 1 1 L1, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RI, Opposing Approach 0 0 76 LT, Conflicting Approaches 3 57 57 RT, Conflicting Approaches 76 0 0 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.02 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.00 0.36 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.01 1.00 1.00 • Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.19 0.00 0.00 Approach Capacity 382 547 605 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS WS 57 382 0.15 1.8 A NB 211 547 0.39 4.3 A SB 183 605 0.30 3.2 A Intersection Delay = 3.5 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS• Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLFU.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) LK WASHINGTON BLVD (E-W) BURNETT AVE NORTH Analyst MJJ Date of Analysis 6/4/98 Other Information 2000 W/0 PROJECT All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRLTRLTRLTR ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 ) 1 ( 0 0 1 ( 0 0 ) 1 0 • Volumes 60 0 0 141 79 3 189 . PNF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet ER WB NB SB LI Flow Rate 63 0 3 RI Flow Rate 0 83 0 • Approach Flow Rate 63 231 202 Proportion LT 1.00 0.00 0.01 Proportion RT 0.00 0.36 0.00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 202 231 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 433 63 63 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.41 0.41 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.00 0.41 0.47 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 0 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RI, Opposing Approach 0 0 83 LI, Conflicting Approaches 3 63 63 RT, Conflicting Approaches 83 0 0 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.01 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.00 0.36 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.01 1.00 1.00 proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.19 0.00 0.00 Approach Capacity 382 546 605 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS WB 63 382 0.16 1.9 A NB 231 546 0.42 5.0 A 55 2O 605 0.33 3.6 A Intersection Delay = 4.0 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS: Unsignalited Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLWP.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation • University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) LK WASHINGGTON BLVD (E-W) BURNETT AVE NORTH Analyst MJJ • Date of Analysis 6/4/98 Other information 2000 W/ PROJECT All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRITRLIRLTR ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 ) 1 f 0 0 1 ( 0 0 ) 1 0 Volumes 67 0 0 148 82 3 207 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 71 0 ? RI Flow Rate 0 R6 0 Approach Flow Rate 71 242 221 Proportion LI 1.00 0.00 0,01 Proportion RT 0.00 0.36 0.00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 221 242 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 463 71 71 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.45 0.41 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.00 0.41 0.45 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 0 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RT, Opposing Approach 0 0 86 It, Conflicting Approaches 3 71 71 RT, Conflicting Approaches 86 0 0 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.01 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.00 0.36 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.01 1.00 1.00 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.19 0.00 0.00 Approach Capacity 387 539 602 Inlersect.ion Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS WB 71 387 0.18 2.0 A NB 242 539 0.45 5.5 B S8 221 602 0.37 4.0 A Intersection Delay 4.4 • Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS• Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLDR.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) LK WASHINGTON BLVD (E-W) SITE ACCESS Major Street Direction NS • Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst MJJ Date a1f Analysis 6/4/98 Other Information 2000 W/ PROJECT Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LTRLTRLTRITR Ho. Lanes 0 1 ( 0 0 ) 1 0 0 0 0 0 ) 1 ( 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 42 220 42 249 21 0 20 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (:) CV's (t) PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 6-4) HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLOR.HC,O Page 2 Worksheet for IWSC Intersection • Step 1: RT from Minor Street WO EE Conflicting Flows: (vph) 160 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1149 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1149 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB MB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 276 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1266 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1266 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96 IN Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RI Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96 Step 3: TH from Minor Street W8 E8 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 466 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 621 • Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 593 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 466 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 569 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 543 Or) HCS• Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLOR.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95: Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 24 543 ) WB T 0 593 ) 732 5.3 0.1 B 5.3 WB R 23 1149 ) 58 L 48 1266 3.0 0.0 A 0.4 Inteisectiou Dela/ = 0.6 se(./vcch TRAFFICOUNT Site Code : RENTON, WA. PAGE: 1 : BURNETT AVENUE N. FILE: TP1538SP : LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. Movements by: Primary DATE: 6/02/98 . From North .... .... From East .... .... From South .... .... From West .... Vehicle TRUCK .. in TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT Total Total 4:00 PM 0 0 0 13 1 19 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 1 109 1 4:15 1 0 0 11 0 20 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 42 0 102 2 4:30 0 0 0 16 0 22 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 2 114 0 4:45 0 0 0 14 1 11 32 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 43 0 100 4 HR TOTAL 1 0 0 54 2 72 128 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 168 3 425 7 5:00 PM 0, 0 0 19 0 12 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 25 0 85 1 5:15 0 0 0 12 1 12 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 85 1 5:30 0 0 0 12 0 22 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 109 0 5:45 0 0 0 8 0 19 33 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 26 0 86 1 HR TOTAL 0 0 0 51 1 65 129 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 120 0 365 3 DAY TOTAL 1 0 0 105 3 137 257 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 288 3 790 10 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.80 0 0 0 61 61 - 0 0 1100 East 4:00 PM 0.85 2 72 128 0 200 - 36 64 0 South 4:00 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 4:00 PM 0.91 4 0 168 3 171 - 0 98 2 Entire Intersection North 4:00 PM 0.84 1 0 0 54 54 - 0 .0 1100 East 0.85 2 72 128 0 200 - 36 64 0 South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 0.91 4 0 168 3 171 - 0 98 2 CV • TRAFFICOUNT Site Code : RENTON, WA. PAGE: 1 : BURNETT AVENUE N. FILE: TP1538SP : LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. Movements by: Primary DATE: 6/02/98 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.80 0 0 0 61 61 - 0 0 4100 Bast 4:00 PM 0.85 2 72 128 0 200 - 36 64 0 South 4:00 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 4:00 PM 0.91 4 0 168 3 171 - 0 98 2 Entire Intersection North 4:00 PM 0.84 1 0 0 54 54 - 0 0 %100 Bast 0.85 2 72 128 0 200 - 36 64 0 South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 0.91 4 0 168 3 171 - 0 98 2 1Y:M}�Y�} BURNETT AVENUE N. ::•:_::,:: N vr.4 4 W I E titi4titiW% tiff\\LM tiLV:.L•:4':.44ti W.W.%Stiti V*V:ritiVA\NVA.V.Y.N 77 MW [TRUCK] 1 0 0 54 : " :•:::.•.. .•::.:':.:.:`;`' M 2 [TRUCK] ::ssss ssssssssss:s:sss ssssss'ss :rs»> rss ss:s` 54 72 SW._ 11%f"::ti;:.:;:1C2:::-.::"r:•i:4µ W.4 WAY:MvW.M!J :!:YN V.i:•::{ti•+i:•:::•:.•::•i::{•Y.: yAY.M%::::g:::::•:::i?:::$::i:• :: }::::•: :: ::is w'' ' LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. 200 128 YI.44M.N 3 0 168 171 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. : `ti 0 i HiN:Mg:.::::::.:gi:::ii.i:E:M:::::':::.:::M: Y::: }:ti2(2:2•:is .WAWAY:Y.W.WNMAMl.MJA\ 0 [TRUCK] 4 tiKyy4•:•::::•r:>::: Y;:v'+�Y; 0 0 0 0 [TRUCK] 0•:•:•::•: 44H44:::::::::.:•: ::::::,W..A'? \44\h•AVAVAY...AWAYlIA...,, Kj :; BURNETT AVENUE N. am ( (2 z N 30th St. Q �mac- ---- '` .���'�•'� t'c. Z ci=4 , °i v Project Site O �- F t (0 co 0- N tut'• .7 Q06( O< 1 N : • • • S FIGURE PROTO immilmilmviummomar 2 City of Renton Traffic Accident Record System (\✓ Corridor Report G� June 04, 1998 Corridor: LAKE WASH BLVD N between GARDEN AVE N and BURNETT AVE N i .ort Period: January 01, 1995 to December 31, 1997 f 0 Comments: ! �' Report requested by Ron Mar, for TPE, 6/4/98 Accident Accident Dir Dir Tot Num Num PDO Report # Date Location Veh 1 Veh 2 Veh Fat Inj H&R 534 06/07/97 LAKE WASH BLVD N at PARK DR. N N->W E->W 2 0 0 P DAY: Sat TIME: 2100 TYPE OF ACCIDENT: Right Angle 240 04/02/96 LAKE WASH BLVD N between BURNETT AVE N and THIRTIETH ST. N N->S -> 1 0 0 P DAY: Tue TIME: 2345 TYPE OF ACCIDENT: Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Totals: 2 0 0 Page number 1 affic Accident Record Syst. 62 Corridor Report Corridor: BURNETT AVE N between LAKE WASH BLVD N and THIRTIETH ST. N Report Period: January 01, 1995 to December 31, 1997 Comments : Report requested by Ron Mar, for TPE, 6/4/98 N O MATCHING DATA FOUND traffic Accident Record Sy :m Location Report Location: HOUSER WY N at PARK DR. N Report Period: January 01, 1995 to December 31, 1997 Comments : Report requested by Ron Mar, for TPE, 6/4/98 N O MATCHING DATA FOUND Op ,Te. 4�;n 4I CITY OF RENTON �c�/ y PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS �'0 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 14, 1998 (revised May 14, 1998) TO: Pre-Application File No. 98-35 FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning Q11A SUBJECT: Pre-Application Comments for Tamaron Pointe Apartments at 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application materials for the above-referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. 1. General. The 9.8 acre subject property is located at 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard North. The site is presently developed as the Lake Terrace Park mobile home park, with approximately 92 mobile home site. Access is from two existing driveways, one at the north end of the site, and a second at the south end of the site. The proposal would result in the redevelopment of the site for 196 apartments in 15 buildings. Four of the buildings would have apartment flats, and 11 of the buildings would be three-story townhomes. Parking would be provided for 394 vehicles -- 121 spaces would be within garages, with the remainder in surface parking lots. 2. Zoning and Development Standards. The subject site is zoned Residential - Multi-Family - Infill (RM-I). The RM-I permits minimum net densities 10 dwelling units per acre and maximum net densities of 20 dwelling units per acre. For the 9.8 acre developable area, the minimum number of dwelling units that could be constructed is 98, while the maximum number of dwelling units that could be developed is 196. As proposed, 196 units would be at the maximum permitted density. If any areas of the site were deducted due to sensitive areas (wetlands, steep slopes, etc.) or the dedication of public rights-of-way, then the minimum/maximum number of dwelling units that could be developed would need to be revised. Buildings must maintain a minimum front yard setback 20 feet from the front property line. Structures must maintain a minimum 15 foot rear yard setback from the rear property line. Minimum side yard setbacks are based on the lot width. The required setback is 10% of the lot width or 5 feet, whichever is greater. Lots 120 feet or greater in width are required to have a minimum side yard setback of 12 feet. The entire structure shall be setback an additional one foot for each story in excess of two (2) up to a maximum cumulative setback of 20 feet. Special side yard setbacks of for lots \\TS SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SERDEV&PLAN.INGUTH\PRE-APPS\TAMAPTS.DOC\jth May 12, 1998 Page 2 • abutting single family residential zones are 25 feet along the abutting sides of the property. The property abuts R-8 Zoning on east, therefore a minimum setback of 25 feet would be required from the east property line. Proposed Building No. 2 would be located closer than 25 feet to the east property line. All of the other structures comply with applicable setback requirements. Maximum permitted building height in the RM-I is 35 feet or 2-1/2 stories. Height and stories may be increased through the Site Plan Review process if features are incorporated into the project such as pitched roofs, parking under the buildings, etc. Lot coverage is limited to 35% but may increase to 45% with approval through the Hearing Examiner process. Impervious surface shall not exceed a combined total (building footprint, sidewalks, driveways, etc.) of 75%. Setback areas and open space areas shall be landscaped otherwise determined through the site plan review process. If adjacent to a single family residentially zoned lot then a 15-foot landscape strip shall be required along the adjacent street frontage. Properties that abut a less intense residential zone may be required to incorporate special design standards (e.g. additional landscaping, larger setbacks, facade articulation, solar access, fencing) through the site plan review process. 3. Parking. Surface parking is acceptable in the side yard and rear yard parking areas. It appears that the proposal would meet this guideline. Multi-family residential projects require a minimum of 1- 1/2 parking spaces for residents, and an additional 1 guest parking space for each four units. For 196 apartments, the applicant is required to provide 343 parking spaces (294 resident spaces and 49 guest parking spaces). Of these, up to 30%of the spaces could be designated for compact parking and have stall dimensions of 8-1/2' wide x 16' long. Standard parking stall dimensions are 9' wide x 20' in length. If parking for recreational vehicles is proposed, then such parking is limited to the equivalent of one RV parking space for each 15 units (provided that restrictive covenants on the property do not prohibit RV parking). 4. Shoreline Permit. Portions of the subject site appear to be located within 200 feet of Lake Washington. If this is the case, then the applicant will need to show the Ordinary High Water Line of the site plan drawings and apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. It anoears that,no r. site construction would take place within the restricted areas. ' 5. Environmental Review and Site Plan Review. The project requires Environmental Checklist Review (SEPA). The environmental review will analyze impacts to the environment including short- term and long-term impacts. It is important to provide complete information regarding the proposal including the amount of steep slope area, the quantity of earth to be imported/exported or moved on site, drainage information, wetland,greenbelt, or other sensitive area studies,geotechnical information, or other studies as required. In addition, all development within the RM Zone requires Site Plan Review. Since the project would have more than 100 dwelling units and 300 parking spaces, a public hearing would be required. The Site Plan Review process will look at the proposed site development, organization of the site, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, landscaping, recreation and open space, building size and bulk, lighting and signage. A landscape plan will need to be submitted with your land use application. The combined environmental and site plan process would take 12 weeks to complete unless the application is placed on hold or appeals of either the environmental or site plan decision are filed. May 12, 1998 Page3 Areas designated as Greenbelt are located east of the property, and may include a portion of the steep slopes on the east portion of the site. Development is restricted or prohibited in greenbelt areas and on slopes where the individual or predominant slope is greater than 40%slope. A Parks Mitigation Fee would be required through the environmental review process. The fee is • $354.51 per multi-family residential unit and is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee is estimated to be$69,489.84 ($354.51 x 196 units). r cc: Jana Huerter q$- 35 OF RENT,. MAY 0 5 1998 �v�`L" v1V/SI0N MEMORANDUM DATE: 14Th' 4) iG GIg TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, Project Planner FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application:7/ -01Q POI N7-6 7S LOCATION: off) 0-0 L4L?, . A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for j(0 OV , Thursday, /14 74--/ jj-4-1"- in the 3rd floor conference room. If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11:00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough "permit level" review at this time. Note only major issues that must be resolved prior to formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please send a representative. Please submit your written comments to J.{zrin 1 at least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. iC T I- L r/z t F Y s G c c.._ A Al rJC7 ?7-1 cis ATTENDANCE SIGN IN SHEET DATE in /y/ /-�� PURPOSE OF MEETING / ' `' ////" NAME.. REP ;<; :...:.. .:::,•�� ;:< <:.: RESENTING, AQIPRESSavo�� :...::::: x€<<.��:>,� T ,M -:...;::�;:;>;. ...[�,. �5...:....!~t~�P ONE ���: I►r f cp �{Orc CrdJ lit,a�-laV n(_ ®st- 7,04, 3/ - 7'-D . :ilr. ""etlieltfida . IA 1.41Y-)' d --CCAK. y ro 1 I. w �. (ii.bQ( K _t y zc/-13 ?- - -- Ie, a0. V55 Gt./iv r /V1 or v p/a/t-i /z C )/'C4-t) 41s 2? ?- 01./& H DF.VCVCs--ADMIN ATTEND Y tiT O • CITY OF RENTON 'l -N�o FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 1998 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal t SUBJECT: Tamaron Pointe Apts., 2100 Lak ashington Blvd. N. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow cannot be provided until we have the square footage's of all the Buildings. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of each of the buildings and one additional hydrant for each 1000 GPM of required fire flow are required within 300 feet of the each building. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the fire alarms and sprinkler system installation in each building. 3. Provide a list of any flammable, combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are to be used or stored on site. 4. A fire mitigation fee of$76,048.00 is required based on $388.00 per Unit. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Pre-Application Review Development Services Division May 14, 1998 WATER: 1. The Water System Development Connection charge is $510 per unit. To be paid at time construction permit is issued. 2. The appears to a 12", 8"and 6"water line in the vicinity of the property. 3. The project is located in the 435 water zone. 4. If required fire flow is over 2500 gpm a water loop system is required. A loop system is required to be in a 15-ft. utility easement. The required fire flow is determined by the City's Fire Prevention Office. 5. One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Each fire hydrant delivers 1000 gpm of fire flow. 6. The primary hydrant is to be within 150-feet of the structures, but not closer than 50-feet. The secondary hydrants to be within 300 feet of the structures. 7. A composite utility plan will be required for the SEPA plan submittal. The plan needs to include main locations, size,valve locations and hydrant locations. 8. The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone#2. 9. Water to be separated by 10-feet from storm and sewer. 98cm082W 98CM082W.DOC\ TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Pre-Application Review Development Services Division May 14, 1998 SEWER(Waste Water) 1. The Sewer System Development Connection charge is $350 per unit. 2. The sewer System to be in a utility easement and be separated from water by ten(10) feet. 3. A vertical profile will be required. 4. If the project produces fats, oils or grease then the applicant must provide an appropriate removal system. 5. A 8-inch sewer main is available in lake WA. Blvd. which connects to a metro line. 6. A conceptual plan for utilities will be require for the Environmental Review. 7. Show vertical clearances of all utility line crossings. 8. Sewer minimum slope to property line is 2%. 9. The side sewer to have a clean out 5-feet in front of each building and at every second bend or every 100 feet on side sewers in excess of 100 feet. 98cm082s 98CM082S.DOC\ TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Pre-Application Review Development Services Division May 14, 1998 TRANSPORTATION: 1. A brief transportation analysis report to be provide. 2. Transportation trip rates and traffic counts are to be determined by using the ITE trip generation manual. 3. The traffic mitigation fee is$75 per new trip generated. 4. Off site improvements are curb, gutters and sidewalks required on Lake Washington blvd. N. the full length of the property frontage. A five(5) foot planter strip is required between the curb and sidewalk. 5. An additional off site improvement street lighting is required for Lake Washington Blvd. covering the full length of the property frontage. Street lighting to meet City of Renton Standards. Lighting level is 0.6 ft-c minimum and uniformity ratio of 4:1 minimum. 6. All overhead electrical and communication cables abutting to the property frontage on Lake Washington Blvd. under 55-K.V. to be underground in coordination with the electrical and commutations utilities at the Developers expense. Trenching and conduit location and size for the electrical and communication facilities to be shown on the plans. 7. Entrance and roaway grades not to exceed 8%. A variance most be requested for grades above 8%. 98cm082T FZ j�� SS ?Ay-aw �l s�a cam.,. (,arc., 04/1-, ,uz� 98CM082T.DOC\ TAMARON POINT APTS. 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. Pre-Application Review Development Services Division May 14, 1998 STORM(Surface Water) 1. The Storm System Development Connection Charge is $0.129 per.square feet of new impervious surface area for all uses. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with elevations. Provide datum and benchmark. 3. The utility drawings to comply with the City of Renton Drafting Standards. 4. Show the topography of entire site and minimum of 30-feet outside the property. 5. A Level #1 Storm Drainage analysis is required per the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Address all Core Requirements and Special Requirements. Special Requirements 5 and 6 to be specifically addressed. 6. Runoff collected from pavement or gravel surface with vehicle access/parking must flow through an oil/water separator CB or adequate biofiltration system. 7. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plans to be part of submittal. 8. Wet land issue to be address if they exist. All location to be shown on the drawings delineated. 9. The East slope (at the property line) and the West slope (abutting to Lake Wn. Blvd.) integrity to be given careful consideration. The Developer should address any needs noted. 10. Provide legend,title sheet and index with plans. 11. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5,000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 12. The project is located in the Aquifer Protection Zone#2. 13. Vertical profile of the storm system is required. 98cm082D 98CM082D.DOC\ I °I%_ 35 RECE I M/ vED MEMORANDUM EcoNAY 57998 AN SEA°41EG c O Air. n1G DATE: MIH 4, Nei 63 TO: Long Range Planning FROM: Jim Hanson, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: /f11M/ -D/\l POINT-J 7S LOCATION: a-1 20 tai-l' ilUa )72 jinn 131 v " _ Please review the attached preliminary project plans for consistency with applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies. Please submit your written comments to c��nr')/14/ no later than . May /?- . Thank you. • We will not be able to include comments received after this date in the presentation/summary we prepare for the applicant.Ar �✓ e- qr� �YaViS 'a �� TFor �le- r2/Gccli c / 4-- fr i , Aanle- poiK)k ✓ iVate7S T Nei &/&/newi7T P //ct P - 71 5� i, , ow/m/s 0/ rwJi Gf ed. ot" ir,obi home, pwr s ohh ex-el ;trio fie- /'A6 ,b01 f� (2 l biJM of COrl yer51 or) 40 re,i e o r7ai rvt,-, J Porgy, o LQ/)erC ,i , f-1 /20 r em er . cOT 4e re n c%e awd -tk . Corr -/ o1Ier hs,'YZQ -la e pI nOro coovr>100 ��#e_r lord o --, /12 ,'c .0/I m,q/� // ,/6�e- e �5 TO 63% s� 7�� Scor/ or) 0( teej/ kii4e- o! j WIT/2 /1760 b-e--/OiN) ;G o1 ZOW-rilik); rrle d ;' . i-) in c oi- 1G , ��i� , l awP- � r'5 will ,6e S oij iti eh c o Llr� - V o �1r)%- I t! Corr> i I rk -i c r c/g J r.,26„,,,r,. -1-0 k)grd -de- re%col) r) of INN) i'7 c or1- r€s� � . // Of TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: Transnation No. 867411 Customer Reference: TRANSNATION TITLE INS. CO. Escrow No. Seller Cugini 1200 - 6TH AVE. , STE. 100 Buyer/B ower TCR acific SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attn: ALEX GALLOWAY By8r er call: ,�i-y on 11 For service (425) 646-8589/1-800-441-7701 JOHN W. JONES, DAVID P. CAMPBELL MARK S. NIKLASON or CLAUDIA D. RELLIER (FAX #(425) 646-8593) SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1 TO THE FIRST COMMITMENT ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes which impact title to property set forth in the above-referenced commitment. Effective Date: May 14 , 1998 at 8 : 00 A.M. Jay CITY OF A11G 0 SCHEDULE "B" I`,�t=GE1VED A) Paragraph No. 11 is deleted. EXCEPT AS TO THE MATTERS REPORTED HEREINABOVE, THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS ORDER HAS N 0 T BEEN RE-EXAMINED. ---END--- DPC Copies have been sent to the following: DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE 10500 NE 8TH STREET, #1800 BELLEVUE, WA 980044300 Attn: CRISSA CUGINI1/1 JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE 41 S HIGH ST, #1900 COLUMBUS, OH 43215 Attn: MICHAEL ORDING1/1 TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL 4010 LAKE WASH BLVD. NE #330 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 Attn: DOUG DAILEY Order No. 867411 MONTERREY COUNTRY CLUB 323 SAND REMO PALM DESERT, CA 92260 ATTN: GERRY SHELLAN BARBEE MILL CO. , INC. P.O. BOX 359 RENTON, WA 98057 ATTN: ALEX CUGINI 1/1 BRYN MAWR PROPERTIES, INC 11326 RAINIER AVE. SO. SEATTLE, WA 98178 Attn: STEVE HARER 1/1 HALLIN ASSOCIATES INC. 31218 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S. SUITE N FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ATTN: JOE CARNAHAN Page 2 1. . fYT! After recording return to: Name Davis Wright Tremaine LLP — Crissa Cugini Address 10500 NE Eighth Street, #1800 City, State,Zip Bellevue, WA 98004-4300 8(.�(Hl� $ FILED FOR RECORD FULL RECONVEYANCE TRANSN RD'�T THE REQOEST OF ATIO,V TITLE INSURANCE ST Reference#(If Applicable): 9002231293 Grantor: (I)Lucille Fisher.dba Seattle Bonding Company (2) Lawyers Title Company of Washington.Inc Grantee(s): (1) Loomos.George B. Legal Description (abbreviated): 2100 Lake Washington Blvd.N..Lot#18.Renton. WA Additional legal(s)on page Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# r1 The undersigned as trustee under that certain Deed of Trust, dated September 29, 1988 in which (NJ George B. Loomoa is grantor and Lucille Fisher dba Seattle Bonding Company is beneficiary,recorded on 1.1 February 23, 1990, as Auditor's File No. 9002231293, records of King County, Washington, having received from the beneficiary under said Deed of Trust a written request to reconvey, reciting that the obligations secured by the Deed of Trust have been fully satisfied,does hereby reconvey,without warranty, to the person(s) entitled thereto all of the right, title and interest now held by said trustee in and to the property described in said Deed of Trust,situated in King County, Washington as follows: 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N., Lot#18, Renton, WA 98056, King County, Washington. Dated: May 20. 1998 LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION ( e) By ig A. B el Its Vi President SIATL OF WASHING"'ON ) ) ss COUNTY OF 101 ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Dwight A.Bickel is the person(s)who appeared before me,and said person(s) acknowledged that he signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authonzed to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Vice President of Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation,to he the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.l • C'3 ),() I CYZ Dated t ft DARLA TRAUTMAN T I 11 fC{lul m/10 STATE OF WASHINGTON Title ^ NOTARY--.-_PUBLIC My appointment expires: I `1 In MY COtt41SSION EXPIRES 4-09-00 • LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION Trazon attdoai AY,221998 8:3`} COMMITMENT FOR ISSUED BY TITLE INSURANCE TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Transnation Transnation Title Insurance Company, an Arizona Corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsements and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT, AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. J TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY �*�\�`E INS[/�44, \91CO�POR�!(0 BY ,X- 14 SEPT. Ii,1991 a�>~� Chairman and Chief Executive Officer .:4 gR170Na Attest: .:,.:�( ��� Secretary Commitment-WA Cover C...... 1111111_ncn /o no\ COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1.The term mortgage, when used herein,shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect,lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such know- ledge. If the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pur- suant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith, (a)to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions,the Conditions and Stipulations,and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excluded from the coverage of that policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs, attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason thereof: AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY(10-17-92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD LOAN POLICY(10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created fees or expenses which arise by reason of: subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) statutory lien for services, labor or material); or(e) resulting in loss or restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy, use, damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant or enjoyment of the land; (ii)the character, dimensions or location of had paid value for the insured mortgage. any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a situated. notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit Any governmental police power not excluded by(a) above, except to protection or truth in lending law. the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, 6.Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work Policy. related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7.Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgage insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination;or (c) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not transfer results from the failure: excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date (i)to timely record the instrument of transfer;or of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value (ii)of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value without knowledge. or a judgment or lien creditor. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured clair and not disclosed in • writing to the Company by the insured c4. t prior to the date the TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: Transnation No. 867411 Customer Reference : TRANSNATION TITLE INS. CO. Escrow No. • Seller --- 1200 - 6TH AVE. , STE. 100 Buyer/Bor •wer TCR SEATTLE, WA 98101 Attn: ALEX GALLOWAY By 'r For :ervi.e •n this order call : (425 :46-85 :9/1-800-441-7701 JOH W •NE'. , DAVID P. CAMPBELL or •v K S. KLASON (FAX # (425) 646-8593) SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: March 23 , 1998 at 8 : 00 A.M. 1 . Policy or policies to be issued: Amount ALTA Owner' s Policy $5, 600, 000 . 00 Premium $7, 497 . 00 Standard Policy (Prior Title Evidence Rate) Tax $ 644 . 74 Proposed Insured: TCR PACIFIC NORTHWEST VI, INC. , A TEXAS CORPORATION Total $8, 141 . 74 2 . Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: GERARD M. SHELLAN AND BARBARA J. SHELLAN, HUSBAND AND WIFE; ALEX CUGINI AND NORMA J. CUGINI, HUSBAND AND WIFE; J. STEVE HARER AND NANCY L. HARER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DOING BUSINESS AS LAKE TERRACE ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE 3 . The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows : See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION: " Order No . 867411 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1 : THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 5 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , LYING EASTERLY OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD; EXCEPT THAT PORTION PLATTED AS ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY OF THOSE COMMON BOUNDARY LINES AS ESTABLISHED IN THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT FILED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8509110605 ; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD ATTACH BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 2 : LOTS 39 , 40 AND 41 OF ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 41 CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1020457; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ADJOINING, THAT WOULD BE ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 3 : THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 , ELDON ACRES, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 86 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE WEST 172 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 27, ELDON ACRES, WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5 ; THENCE SOUTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF C.D. HILLMAN' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION NO . 5 , AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 83 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE EAST TO A POINT SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Page 2 Order No. 867411 THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY (200 FEET IN WIDTH) OF PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD COMPANY; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL 4 : THAT PORTION OF A CITY OF RENTON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , HAVING A WIDTH OF 50 FEET KNOWN AS PELLY PLACE NORTH (FORMERLY 102ND PLACE SOUTHEAST) AS SITUATE WITHIN THE PLAT OF ELDON ACRES AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGES 86A AND 86B, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 28 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 16°57 '45" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET OF 433 . 98 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 88°37 ' 15" WEST A DISTANCE OF 52 . 68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED SOUTHEAST 100TH STREET (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MILDRED AVENUE) ORDINANCE NO. 1824 ; THENCE NORTH 16°67 '45" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID STREET A DISTANCE OF 405 . 81 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 39 ; THENCE NORTH 59°59 ' 06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51 .33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 23 , 1987 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8711230876 ; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 3 Order No. 867411 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS . Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS . Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment . B . Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. C. Special exceptions : 1 . Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82 .45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is . 0178 . 2 . General Taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 229650-0200-06 1998 $23 , 772 . 55 $0 . 00 $23 , 772 . 55 The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1998 . 3 . Conservation (CON) Service Charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 229650-0200-06 1998 $5 . 00 $0 . 00 $5 . 00 4 . RESERVATION OF EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVED IN: The Trienon Company PURPOSE: Road AREA AFFECTED: Northerly portion, as described therein RECORDING NO. : 3455850 (Covers Parcel 1) Page 4 Order No. 867411 5 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF : GRANTEE : The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a corporation PURPOSE: Telephone and telegraph, or other signal or communication circuits AREA AFFECTED: The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described RECORDING NO. : 5262910 6 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE : Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE : Underground electric transmission and/or distribution system AREA AFFECTED: 7 feet in width as constructed or to be constructed RECORDING NO. : 7709280595 7 . Matters disclosed by survey recorded under Recording Nos . 791211900 and 8509119008 . 8 . Terms and conditions of Ordinance No. 3447 of the City of Renton, recorded under Recording Nos . 8010060646 and 8012120762 . 9 . Declaration of restrictive covenants imposed by instrument recorded on December 5, 1983 and December 12, 1983 , under Recording No. 8312050533 and 8312120558 . 10 . AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: September 11, 1985 RECORDING NO. : 8509110605 REGARDING: Boundary line agreement 11 . DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: George B. Loomos TRUSTEE: Lawyers Title Company of Washington, Inc . , a corporation BENEFICIARY: Lucille Fisher dba Seattle Bonding Company ADDRESS : 617 - 3rd Ave . , Seattle, Washington 98104 LOAN NO. : --- ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $1, 900 . 00 DATED: September 29, 1988 RECORDED: February 23 , 1990 RECORDING NO. : 9002231293 (Covers property located at 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. , N. , Lot #18, Renton, Washington 98056) Page 5 Order No. 867411 • 12 . DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Gerard M. Shellan and Barbara J. Shellan, husband and wife; Alex Cugini and Norma J. Cugini, husband and wife; J. Steve Harer and Nancy L. Harer, husband and wife, doing business as Lake Terrace Associates, a Washington General Partnership, which acquired title as a joint venture TRUSTEE : Savren Service Corporation, a Washington corporation BENEFICIARY: First Savings Bank of Renton ADDRESS : 201 Wells Ave . S. , (PO Box 360) , Renton, Washington 98055 LOAN NO. : --- ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $745, 000 . 00 DATED: September 4 , 1996 RECORDED: September 6, 1996 RECORDING NO. : 9609060069 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owing with the appropriate lender/agency/individual . 13 . TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS of the joint venture agreement and any amendments under which title is vested. NOTE 1 : According to the application for title insurance, the proposed insured (s) is/are TCR Pacific Northwest VI, Inc. , a Texas corporation. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name (s) of said party(ies) . NOTE 2 : There may be Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Security interests filed with the Department of Licensing in Olympia affecting personal property, crops or agricultural facilities which are not covered by the policy to issue. END OF EXCEPTIONS Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule . Page 6 Order No. 867411 • CC/amh ENCLOSURES : Sketch Vesting deed All recorded encumbrances Copies have been sent to the following: DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE 10500 NE 8TH STREET, #1800 BELLEVUE, WA 980044300 Attn: CRISSA CUGINI1/1 JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE 41 S HIGH ST, #1900 COLUMBUS, OH 43215 Attn: MICHAEL ORDING1/1 MONTERREY COUNTRY CLUB 323 SAND REMO PALM DESERT, CA 92260 ATTN: GERRY SHELLAN BARBEE MILL CO. , INC. P.O. BOX 359 RENTON, WA 98057 ATTN: ALEX CUGINI 1/1 BRYN MAWR PROPERTIES, INC 11326 RAINIER AVE. SO. SEATTLE, WA 98178 Attn: STEVE HARER Page 7 �?^ I Jb - ze oo ,p° � \ Z •,f3n�e ,r b1'rJ �, v?.i,�i's I: �.$)�* rs I ..c 45 O 29hq p y G r • R N SP.226' 8 $ 26TH , `� % 3 7 -0 1h y1'yl a t, -; ;.' 7904189a a(r.se.,w.r ,0 , 4 ` A}' 3° ¢h per.s �.-.>d '' �P t'a i° * s r \, ,O•b' a �,, 00-rszfw 3es . ,�44 d • X 38 , ,.„ ° E �. h9 , 1 `z_. •''4 `ram.-i '., Y %, 1.° r r t,'`W eb �' t+ . $ '0' 1eD + ,r? „ •.'`oLOT 4.e,,,LOT . N9 j N e` o ,, 43 ` v f er.n ...� Qe • ` ,r -.• ".43 t, Ci .af;f ,a�g-s.• a..,. )K.Y . ,1. R p i y •✓e!-af'ow f -+.a m r •\ o �1 V : �. nc•`b ,rs Y'.O I wd'y ,� �i+,tl. 4,0 t s-. l d .1.a LOT 1 • 5e•\' 39 ° ,. t' ..9't",0•`'."1- AYfi •t•6,, Let's , .,Y.si..r fa '" 42 O N } xv , C ,i'•t • tong y'u y�> i° '. , 'Y c w 3 l0T 77�' I G 7� ,� v 1!' V ` L �'C.nt. =i n fM�e •p i \f,u. H,�u-.- 1... i'"1.4..PM I.f7 - �n v 8 J� o, qh' a v, • erf f7.f7 11 w,r n.Y,� i C ��� e.>Y,f+ �� O -`V, 4r.00 /4e.34 .,r r/ fee-.f•f3i_ f I ;scot Y:`; 41 �` R. ,.QL1bt'sr' ce1� rM�tM snf.$ rioae.00�, I rn•e s..er i a C .0-.f-.s r ran 653.44 _ Ea b•r'+ ��1� KUG ` a ¢ ,t wr 1 3h'1o'� Y LotC0� x, b z•' • e.ln, ,s s., _�'_' -.-,>--- -•;, .. S (sf im,r sr71 .c Cod aza ° se' S. -Zrur rr-tarsiA.--� . _ a u �S �+ . TMO05Lot D,4 R A q'+ ILet r •�� �� t _ �, ,+'`n .....• acq aid I• • 3 NN-,•-K✓ ?-•+ , O ,*V .,1,f.�I.43w' , n.w... 7.e `n +'sIs V IA t N. Will ST. , A� an e„ , �� • 8 REN S►11i9-r�73•+►°790L]04ofe + a �` , v. lot I/O I( Lot 2,0t'{ �i ,i++Lot.-3 ��1�,�, Z. 3 • rail tl .f,I , wtt�. •.� • �) e i\rY-N-isr V • + \ � 1 3 Y ,.` �N 'a e,'.0 Z 1 • 1 y — ,,;t,n tz ,� ; sP \ z 330. �• : .. 3. •• , ,-•' t,. Vg.1 . �'� s a • Toys o ..4\ 7� p u o x r t' t Neh r zeo 4. u. L ro �y y„,• _ i z. I C m N �a 338.. C. .. 344 I. u. el �1 to 339 ° e t uNN , i.• t` r:\:f"----7Z c.Y 5es-40-4eE a o �. 0. r, \ CO qFy o`A g • 0 0 o o Q.3o o o O J h�.*• \a 34�K h . i Z t,,„; - 9,:o- ,-,\''\ O , ♦1 `� gp,e 29011�-y. rc..,.+•=7"--Ne9'23-44w This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en- croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further information. I ( _..\ STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLL,,. 1990 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building or zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating, prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use;or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been iet,vrded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,'encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: (a)whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy,or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency or similar creditors'rights laws. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY(10-17-92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD OWNER'S POLICY(10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which anse by reason of: 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the affect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.(b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors'rights laws,that is based on: (a)the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer,or (b)the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i)to timely record the instrument of transfer,or (ii)of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. SCHEDULE B STANDARD EXCEPTIONS SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY-STANDARD COVERAGE AND CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real properly or by the public records;proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts,rights,interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession,or claiming to be in possession thereof. 3. Easements,liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies,conflicts in boundary lines,shortage in area,encroachments,or any other facts which a correct survey of the land would disclose,and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien,or right to a lien,for labor,material,services or equipment,or for contributions to employee benefit plans,or liens under workmen's compensation acts,not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a)Unpatented mining claims;(b)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(c)Indian treaty or aboriginal rights,including,but not limited to,easements or equitable servitudes;or,(d)water rights,claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b),(c)or(d)are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use,control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation;any prohibition or limitation on the use,occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may fonnerty have been covered by water. 8. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage collection or disposal,or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY- EXTENDED COVERAGE 1.Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2.Underground easements,servitudes or installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3.(a)Unpatented mining claims;(b)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(c)Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including,but not limited to,easements or equitable servitudes;or,(d)water rights,claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b), (c)or(d)are shown by the public records. 4.Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 5.Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity,or garbage collection or disposal,or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. 1004-252A ram- -514 Northwest Region WASHINGTON • Park Place#1910 Sixth Avenue at University Street Seattle,Washington 98101 Chelan-Douglas Counties 700 N.Mission Street,Wenatchee,WA (509)662-4721 • Clark County 501 S.E.Columbia Shores Boulevard Suite 500,Vancouver,WA (206)628-2800 • Agency Operations Park Place#1910 Sixth Avenue at University Street (206)695-1301 Seattle,Washington 98101 NORTHWEST REGION (206)628 2725 • King County 1200 6th Ave.,Ste#100 Park Place Building Seattle,WA 98101 (206)628-4650 • Kitsap County TITLE AGENTS COMMITMENT FOR 9619 Levin Road N.W.,Silverdale,WA TITLE INSURANCE (360)692-4556 WASHINGTON • Benton • Clallam • Cowlitz • Franklin Okanogan County 700 Okoma Drive,Omak,WA (509)422-3490 Island • Jefferson • King • Lewis • Pierce County Pacific • Skagit • Whatcom• Yakima 6111 100th Street S.W. Tacoma,Washington (206)589-1488 OREGON • Snohomish County Benton • Jackson •Linn 2939 Colby Avenue,Everett,WA (206)252-1156 Marion • Polk • Yamhill • Spokane County North 720 Argonne Road,Spokane,WA (509)922-2222 ISSUED BY TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • Thurston County Transnation 2625 Martin Way,Olympia,WA (206)943-4150 • HOME OFFICE: OREGON 1700 Market Street l Philadelphia,PA 19103-3990 Multnomah • Clackamus • Washington Counties 2200 US,Bancorp Tower 111 S W Fifth Avenue Portland,Oregon 97204 (503)222-9931 ���� B 1004-252A 1!1!. 1 Cr`1:1;i:C1'l;i : 1'!:r'1._! a.i.l( ri. !•!. ;.... i !\'! 1: :, '..: • 1.!a;. !'A'I:II''!'Ir .. t ! '1'li;,'1' t'rVNTV 8I:CON: ..r: NO. !; ,I 'O .t ", 3 i DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Will ki AS. Lake terrace Park Associates is the Owner of the folluwin•1 real'u 'C` property in the City of Renton, County of Kiny. State of Washington, described as Exhibit • -)" "A" attached hereto. .. • 1 J :2 WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following r-• restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above C`.1 described real properly. .T` NOW, THEREFORE. the aforesaid owner(s) l.et eby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: A. Prior to publication of the rezone ordinance for application R-090-81, the applicant shall provide a total of $6.450 as a voluntary payment to the City of Renton, which fund shall constitute the total contribution, and shall be used exclusively for the traffic improvements and associated work identified in uI, 2, and 3 below: I. Widen 800 lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 feet between Park Drive and Houser Way to widen 800 lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard at its approach to the intersection of North Park Drive. 2. Update the traffic signal control at the intersection of 1 ake Washington Boulevard and North Park Drive. 3. Improve the intersection of Burnett Avenue North and Lake Washington Boulevard to accommodate left turns across traffic southbound toward the proposed development. B. The following off-site public street improvements shall be a condition of any development permit issued by the City and are to be accomplished coincident with the development of the site should such development. be pursued by the applicant and approved by the City. The applicant may request, and the Board of Public Works may coosider, a deferral of any of the work in accordance with the then applicable City codes. C. Provide total cost for installing the left turn lane opposite the entrance to the Lakeside site. D. Provide off--site improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard, curbs, nutters, sidewalks, and street lighting, together with all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the Lakeside site. E. Provide asphalt surface, gravel-based temporary sidewalks. 6 feet in width from the subject property to the entrance of Gene Coulon Beach Park, to be located and installed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Department of Public Works, said plans and improvements to include necessary associated drainage appurtenances. F r,ri l;er, traffic control for pedestrian crossing over Lake Washington Boulevard from its east side to its west side in the location of the north entrance to Gene Coulon Park would be provided, such traffic control to consist of striping and associated signing to the extent that such sidewalk improvements have been otherwise provided, this applicant is not required to duplicate those improvements. 1 I . No develot n:ent •)f this project is to occur east of the toe of slope as identified on that certain s.jrvev recorded under King County Auditor f ale li/912I191)UI. Book 21, pg. 168 of Surveys. (;. I ake Terrace Associates shall amend their reclassification application to limit the maximum number of dwelling units requested to 18/; provided, however. that in the event that the zor;inq limitation of the subject area described in Exhibit "A" should change by ordinance se as to permit more units than 18/, then such zoning change shall supercede and supplant that portion of the restrictive covenants contrary thereto. On July 14, 1985. Lake terrace Park Associates represented by Gerard M. Shellan, formally amended their rezone application pursuant to the stipulations :1' executed by both parties on June 15. 1983. and subsequently included in the :n decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 73, 1983. L^ N r1 1 HESE CUVENAN I S shall run with the land and expire on December 51, 2025. Cs.? T-1 (") • r Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Managing Partners: ./y--- i_>? — ♦— ALEX CUCINI R. r J. S V . HARER 11 `J SI All OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of King ) On this _`1-i11 day of November, 1985, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn. personally appeared AL_EX CUGINI. JR., & SIEVE HARER, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they • signed the said instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. Notary Public in and for the State of , Washington. residing at C 73;° — ,o_r( 3,t h therein. 2 - / c: S1 (• T-fl ril f - r'. ?+ !(`.;'nSt (`f -, � 1_7, '?,:' c \( ; rIT %j L ' 111 1 LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCE 1. A: 1 hat portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 5. 1 ownship 25 North. Range 5. East. W.M., in King County. Washington. lying Easterly of lake Washington Boulevard; except Cleat portion platted as Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume !I of plats. page 86. in King County. Washington; together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would attach by operation of law. 1 PARCEL B: 1-4 -- Lots 39, 40, and 41, 1 ldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume I I of Plats, page 86, in King County, Washington; except that portion of I of 41 conveyed to King County fur road purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 1020451; together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would attach by operation of law; together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North, under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3441 that would attach to said property by operation of law. fi • • 1 . _ - ",: Gliz or tw.L`ILVIv, iMNJR 11\V 1U1V ORDINANCE AO. 344 Ai ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHLNGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF PELLY PL. N. (VAC-2-80/LAKE TERRACE ASSOCIATES) WHEREAS a :cpc- Y."i"-•.r. . vo,atii.g G poi lLUL W. reliy L. VJ ..O N. , Renton, King County, Washington, was duly fil-d with the City Clerk CD CD on or about April 30, 1980, and said petition having been signed by CD CD owners representing more than two-thirds of the property abutting upon such street sought to be vacated; and WHEREAS the City Council by Resolution No. 2335 passed and approved on May 19, 1980, and after due investigation, did fix and determine the 23rd day of June, 1980, at the hour of 8:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton to be the time and place for a public hearing thereon, and the City Clerk having given due notice of such hearing in the manner provided by law, and all persons having been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS the Department of Public Works and the Planning Department of the City of Renton having duly considered said petition for said vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, b?ASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described portion of street , to-wit : Sec :hibit "^' :t ached horeto and ...aac part hcracf as if fully set forth herein BE AND TEE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED SUBJECT to an easement over, across , under and on all of the aforedescribed property in favor of the City for utility and related purposes . SECTION II The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of one-half o.. the apprai:,�d value of $ 1.65 per square foot to Petitioner- Owners , said amount not exceeding one-half of the City's appraisal of the righL-^f-war: interest herein vacated, and such charge being reasonable and proper. .l.tic n, trnSettr1GTON SL .:..MITY OF KING t I i P- ----' '(-A Request o 1 DELORES..A-...1:114:hta.city pert in eel to tt.• city of Aerton. t LEA for r -J t Request f n....m::..n co eael,y certldI thet rho toredotne.p:,lirance is s true end cared / ,L,t of Urhnenca fi.t..'.Y' ..j--,....o*the DIY of R on.as d Mears on bu 'Jame 1,-_L_�;, ... _-7 ,. - r....._-_._..i n ....:I.. and do iurtrrer cetih Inc the sloe nal,been p,.nhsned ',coo,: • ,. ,.t I t--' •• n;,:erss N"weof 1 tilir.:heteun o.et r,.y hard etld alfiac•' 1he seal o f int a�dS _ __.1�L:..�-.-- s of CA -CIELC i c . • l. r , - _ t Wrf Cten • SECTION III: This Ordinance shall by effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its pu'ilication A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections , King County, and as otherwise provided _ 1,y law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th cay of July, 1980. • Delores A eMd, y Clerk .D CD .D CD ' APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of July, 1930. CD CD `._ Barbara Y. hinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lnwre::ce J . ;Jarrc.ri City Attorney Date of Publication: OcLober 8, 1980 EXHIBIT "A" VAC-2-80 • • PELLY PLACE NORTH 0r6nance No. 3447 • That portion of a City of Renton street right-of-way situated in the Northwest one quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , having a width of 50 feet known as Pelly Place North (formerly 102nd Place S.E.) as situated within the plat of Eldon Acres as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats pages 86A and 86B records of King County, Washington and further described as follows: Commencing at the nort!=zat i of zts of said plat; thence South 16-57'45" East along the easterly right-of-way line of said street of 433.98 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 27 of said plat; Thence North 88°37'15" West a distance of 52.68 feet to the southeast corner of vacated S.E. 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) Ordinance No. 1824; - Thence-Northetalorg the westerly right-of-way line of said street. Q' a distance of 405.81 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 39; CD ,D Thence North 59°59'06" East a distance of 51.33 feet to the true point of beginning. O O CD CO ;M.1.1t,'..,(t.t.,•4',,tf...415.4.',..44:11•1113$115,47; it lt1.0...et..'iC•"•-•••Lre?,t•I'A.;.• OS,4,1".••1'.•'41".'. '• ' ' -:wp'•;;!.",:;•1 ,.•14,1 -Px. .,4,...'i.t..z,-, C.• i'••••t '''',51 :3,..-1 Ve '''#.1.4'i At t:;1 • 1',',;yir;,11).Ja",1 4.,,,•,,,t;A.„51,, ,, .4:::,...,/,•1';i*iV:,,' ...e..r..7...."1:tii:44:.)triy.f .'.11..ti",' 4 'i ibilli,...le.tt....tmi.....17.n ....,." . '--'4 '. I - ----- )1,4...t).,• '!:...• ,"lt?;a t, ••. . , .,.. . . • nf 4,•1_,P c..... .., C J. ,...s.f Al••• ••C• i yt..:.• . 1,,- .;.„..)40,,ei:;I:Tvi:y4. lik V.1174.C:!v.•:.•.•ell we,v.lures f•I ..." Perow• I_:. *ow Ja(v.ear of ir•f "1:', .11 to 044..z, ..1.,41-.i,/, • et. 411:;,,•j'•.! ,..%::•;:t.:,1:,•.::',•,:": ,...1t.•:: :: :,:,7-:".• • •e.it•0 , g 1 o •• •,11:4i.144!,•,•fr • ' il;1'.' :'•441:::::::,:-:.:••:•::'t:',%'.: :•:''',--1 -• • •• •b .....;,,, .._;i11,1,...1 ;EL.).jl,i. .1. , i. , ....,...ii,4 0..Ds)1.7.:....tri F•4 4r•I•1".......‘"41•4•"4.7•••••• ', .4,4 ••'.1.•it.t .t•i•i '11 . 1'1:11.' r.7;,;;;•..,;-.........,.......-:::.: •••••4*•'" ,t ----- A t H... . . •/ • / ,. .- , •,. -.,,yt ::,1i, ..ri ' . 1 ... 1.14•••••••4.11,0 I alai 01•••.;•• -•• •••4 :14 %• i -• '1 4it ';1.:',r'.‘fl '(141t,;• ip ;i Ile,. T , "•••••*,....is, ..... ......,..,..47,4 11' ,i.„.-...x.ril ;,,, hylw ,,, ,,,,,,IR-. ..........::»..:..r..r.-;.•,....n •,,,,,--,...-„...;•;•-; •,... ) ; / . , , -4.,,.....b.. ,,,,,,,......,...V . .,4,, NA.•••a••:••••••••••tb I.40/0 ••04 OW:or;....... ..k 31>/ ''.: '' ",'t 2f.'"e.".-W' • ir.., r..1:11. 1::::,--•:•.:' ''' •••••'*•'4.•-•.... . 1', '...• -- iffe„,1,7,4c. /..0,f)!,•itil. ,.., i:,,'.1,,i;•e••••.••,T.,.,„.„.1.;,••,,t44 41•;:i:r r.:.:•,..:•••• i • •, • . ' 1 wif4.1,qiikoit'k',,". '!0 io4n Pro.;74,1.4.4,:i.. . .. •t•,1,.••••••.:•.",4,, v.;;;..;,.,.,,,............r.v..,......,,.. •II•well i•$4••••;••tr•:"•• :0 e..4•el • 4•014•StAitaf37. r11 •••.....• •‘ 07:46143••••.:1, latr.',7•r•rir•re•a ) i. ,,, :, .:!.1.. „4,4,,, , , it ) , Ii„..11i•••:,4,1•7.711.1••••••••••••mac••.1*A 44.114••• 'NV* , .i. •:A:a:0 .' rtif:-- i ,I.4.1....e14•1 !,,:1:',.;!•,OW4•••••••••le.jie••3...• ...:::4:4114:1•.;;;%. t,. .X.' ..,. ;.• •.410..,1"'...S.1;r4,..,..'11,0.,..::..,11, ',,...f,l',' 1.1.vt,..-.: -. 47.1 •I••••••• ••••41 . •w. --• •:..,,itv.n:,.,....v 0...1.-.,...7,,,. •It V.o iiiVil 8,00 T.I...a eV,.OM% ./Pl•.I st.raite:1.;. •• / : , , .4. Ib. V, Y py.,1::"..Iii)1. 7 .r,t::•1••4'4% .1%7:re't:Ii743:::. "'""3"'''" "• ,..,..„7"j.• ". i' •11 •.10113.1;....i'll.1..!."‘i i ,,j, , c•.2:1 ;:..z...•••,:f•••• r!•"•?,":::',7io':::• T ..„ —7 7.--__ ____ •u ,.x.0.9,....„-,i,...,11!„,,,I 2 •4 :Es•,..•••••Le•..!•••P•ie.:log.: 7..1••••14"4.Z..4..•:. 44-. L \ 0- el"14 1 e'..wez•e•vett. .• 4.44,',ro.....:l'-•4. i;":.1,'•••;t1 •••I• •• •••4*4.., .. IS '‘' •'' -'.4 C .• Sir:Ii ::4:'''.'910 III T4;0"ri.F•.••••:1:;:::!1•••:•:iileit ........::: . ..."#;•*.19 114 ••4.1. •,'' ' ' '. 5 •:Ili .C.,. .:•i • :•••4,0•••• Ott. • fir o r: '.'i ::...14... •••!.i•:‘•.'..1:4. :...• •• ..: .4 Aft*a 4 i al .‘,0 __. ‘.. 'J.:,...-_, , Li...s,..1 .t.... p, .s . ,1 p. r.. ... dr. .ma ti.o.• .••..gt a •at r,,•.••• %Ai.'....y," r.),,tokik.1',,tiiii 9 . • . ,:lr.:::!:e•••• ,••$. •••••:. -'et • ,..,.t 0:4*•A.—... . ago ...ck -:- = fir 41‘SI IN i.i4.W1.4. ''.4(I.. 7 ••. • . •:1 ra '"" `; •--; V , ... .._, ,....0,:•4 ';.,.•• ... , ..,. ,.....;. ?,. :,;.„ : r 0., ..,;11- 1,e'.`;`!.1.•,,,,••„ . • . ,,,t„,1101,7r,rtill/;1,,tiepCi.,.., ::., • .6 t •••rj 41 , d. C 7(7 ' .q...'1 t. j';:"..r,.'14 I.; ?, , tilk! t 1.14 d ':i .'•‘- 811).. ...------- ES- ..rcs 4r ,.._.) 6 ' I•c*: •Veice p':14,,-;if,:,.: or, ikki„.1.p.iiii,11,10,17'.3,.." 1 ,,- , . .• • it _._• .,. c.• , , „,. ....ey,! .•••••••.4...........:."...: ; , . A4'.,,,,' 1,441 r io'i,14,,,.. of ----- , . , 41$ !i./1 ‘,'IA '.......i•-at,, .;.,,,.:APtx , qlaikft:Irj.! ke,,, - ‘,..., $.10,-- . — Z ... ''.... • t• , 1 ,. It'lUii'li, 1,1,1,,110.:41Pirill'Iti4e ' Feil.a 1 La. ' • ell 1 ..:. i f ..,,,,..:., ......,..•,.,. , .... f.....:„.... ,,,,,,.,, ,,,,40,. , .,.,, 1 ,. . ,, . L 4 ...::fik,,:,,,,,4. t , ,.•I...fdt•',I,`..' ,),T,,p,, ,,.,14.;,•.•,••• Ai' . . . -.1.1 .••-•. u. • . ...,,,,•...-...:SmCratarhmeniji if-•'!=i • 0\4',4'.A?1•4"er P .• s ••••• • !::. I i.itjk.;,I.re&a 4/lia'*" ;, .. 1 ,tt.,. i,' '' , . .•' i i . t 41; it __,...••••• ..,,• ,,,ii , • ttf '.".., 4 iitilltr;kU 4'4' 4...' ''.'''-- • • . ':..f. 1•••"; Ion.' -at- . O " ,I..'‘ . .... /•.:4.,..0• i,••:.4•..,„,•••- . ..,,,_ • ''',/,'•:,441,r.ti,i1'f. •-ti,;41-.r•C•1.•1104.-4, 1,'" ,•••1 v, ,.,‘..r , ,„ , ,':. lib*...,4- l•-• 4" ti'04:9:ti••••*": jt .....•••• • • tr •.; • V,?•,-,'.74: .,,,,,,,"•:,,i.,.311 evi.*,,,..,,:-...:77,, . ,!,.1.4,vi..1j'.1 ti,,i,tc„,;:! , .v, .. . i •,/ A •.° . •I• ,:e AA ; ITli":1;,...410.7:',,':4.1-# •;''''''' o• 0'.:1:t•lits.t P.P.r.srt:•.;4,04:.•••‘, .: t • • .• • • *. .,.4' .7 V .4. ...1 ve ! 1.4'.'4?/.'.4.' 4E::" '•• •V.' ' ..-.'••."'lift 1 '1•••": 1,..nti',A;2,v,•91•::.'. •:•J.';... •., eV'St of,j0 ‘........,..... I.0 -j 4.0.. .' .. '.. : f. 6 ,171! `i'Yf.)‘i 0• — ' 'Ali 4". ) )•.111:,'C q'' . ' -'''1' -I ' 'Fril.}I f C.• 't , '`• 1,1":!:.; . /4! -e„I.,-•••'1,1'.7.trf Y. ' • `Al...7n, . ',":,' ' •' - . - c -' 1 G+4' % . 1141 ---1.2c.., -s..-: . • :vs' • J. :a . . X -.. '-. • ';.r.:',N4.'t'-'.i,•"."4:, %,,a,i;.4,,..A..,•-.,- ii. di,..ii:hi,-c.!.i.,.. ......,,,:„-„-...,, i, ,••r,;1,ia , it 77 i,..,,..r • ' '4't .').•.iigt‘• ••••.sti ,1-. ,•.;44t;.4•.. ),'pii..:ii.i,...:i,.-i',,.,,f,-...1,,t;•,?.,, - _. ... ... ._ . . -;,„, •1.,::.:,$.k,,,., :,4,.,F.:;,. „ , .p: os,vrl.,,,r1.4:-;:.:.-i.;,.;.ci......... ...• or, It Vq.,1.2.1,,e71/1 ,;•,-,t•_/,!,,_.,41.„,,,,, :,% .. ® 4. 4 •• , .• / i. ", , ., 1',1%;h4,‘,^1 ',4...%1 '/,'"P‘'..'i r;";:i •1'''''''17`'' 7 177:....71eo-V-r..s---i"--. "iri. ii—-- — .-— . .....• t• •'. ;f o •I•A,.,,i.....a 7._;.;• -.........................41•7°. ••••••A,,IPti , .. • • • I'I" 4. .<d-;-1,',i-. ;.s.s•-••••?titj.f,.;-...., . ; , . e=moolomos......... i ..,A:,-;•..Vt,4,!i.,..! int !Vit?' 1pii4,i:7'.'-':;- '.!,iiVCiTt-',.!.'..'., . Z A",,• . 4.,•.10'7.i .,Of ,M, ' ,ii,..'.,';': r.,.111,i.:.i...,,,,, • _ . . Irlt •- _- -......--••• . • 't t • , •,:e ---"--- ..- .:‘.-:. .... F"lb:. i;1 V.4.% q4.,I;gA.,•.'-'tr. ''.' '!*,!:' . ' . . •• ' • e t.:. 0 fr. --.. z cs'.,.#.4) k.;, tro..,..-•-iAt---,ty pz,.,.!,:,,,, .,. ,,. . „.. , , 1 ",„ ; 1 •,•,.----..y. - .9 ,••• • 1 , , :: .. , . 1 k%; , d .::-.1,sr :4- at••r 411* It• ez 1.7 t••ast, ‘;: 1..X."(f:.5 C 0't.,-re:A^-,' Al r,:.m en A - .. •. i • • •'1 tZ I li :' "r 444,-4 i I 1.-I 't 7 *-:. '', t•',::::... , '', : ,' ..'•' .:: .'• ',. • ).24 4,,,, ".) 44, /III 4.,..:el•4:,-,r, 4,- ,,,.,, .-,.': ?, ,... "1:',1t ri.,/flq 14,,,r0,44 ,,,,it Itlii,) ...• .. , I..,e :•• • . ,-. . • 4 1;...,. t0:-...tV.,:;', ,ift ,' • , 1 41 I ......s ;ay% . 1 ::. t\ •,, .., li (- i. • irv., i•,:•1,qq, a.Nt,Joe,:...);,. 1.:4„-.,01, ,„.. , : . , ; . , . : / ,:.--... 13.r,....rrj e vi..... t• -.-,::. ,-... nit,5-.4.1 C ai(......:42.:>, . I.-••;',,k .1.'..;, , •' +'' e'''T.?''., l''E. ,'A)4•;:,•''• .c'':i'kt'-'• -• • 1.4.9.44 to-s C."...?•-•sri c12.1,,,Attl,z1,5!- I, . fp,vr,,,-,c:41.1: i;'6k't.'''.',..i4.f...i' ••• zio'kn"•7'.k.ez•f.".•,* • ;11,;,,,;,...1,,40,,„01.1 , `*i,- .. -....01:.,.., ft...........•L. • ,.. .. ••..-. ,-• • zi..4 i;I .... • • •" 4,,- 'jai'lk:aNskIT4-I.\:•:),'.'' ''''V,; 14..4 !"*•.t.:.•":-. ' • ., ••'/.04 ..3 • r•:;.i tZ.,.34riii ' , 110,Ifq V7.?•••'.'4::•.v;!!i.j,16'.:•-•,••,.3.!,,. : , "''e•0•';e •Al •e *-• 'IF', ----' ; l' 'vt11-lativ.,,. "i.; r; ....1), le, 11'; '1.,..„sof ii'l;;;"1;,..„, •..., ..il.k.,,,,..,,,t . 4 . ..._,.„...., ,,,„.,...,:_.„.._:....„.,,,,,,,......;._..,__.... ,___, 1 , Awtrolt..,reff.?:••4••••13 ...............,,...:...(N"'"!.* .. I.t el I..././ /4 t.:...p/ ';Ali'%•:,(6 4 ': EtY.;••Pilv',•77,..00,4':..1'..1.5 4.0*4 :,:. .4,1;7••••••••••-•-•-•--....-• - ......":- -.7,•••-•••.-..-..-..... •-•.--- -------,....,— .... ..-. 4.".1.,.."3•4.3 IC C.:!..•:•;;;,•;. •...i t:•‘:, .%;!..;!".7 fp tlAN,J,!:„.,01f1,14.'/?4,1•011.1.I..4 :....a s'AS••,' . •••• /,.... . .j•• •'''' -4/.4.•,•4 se 4 sii,.4.4 '4..'• : , ''',, , ../..7r,...,5 if.,•,,„s /,..f i •PI-..f.:, •••.•::1. 4,•.,..*''...1 . . •, . • AD:....fAl fi....... II i, ' • .• • •• • • * '''': '''.:.',''''i'1 :Oqi•-.MffliW17,..4'..f:V-c r.`wi,',10%- !^r' .4 ' ' ' ... 4...••••••• AV:./t:FPO'', ..M.:: ff: 1 i ' 1114,111 '1., 'ft.."'" ' 1'?'•'i'." 141 2.11‘16.:itr.1*,.i,d,‘.•V.:. ,,,,,, • /4.1A'an op- 311 -•is. , .,' , .,.r.1"..N.-,4.:e.,, ', . .,,,...„, -:". C...er e•-• ..,„ *,,,..i.;`,..,ie.1,c•;i1 to"• ,•••••••••.,-,.9.ft.%a*sr.....Ir or r rrar, /701.,a,d0-CpiASTIVN e itv.:ce..tkt .4..:*--:--•--•--' --'.• I t'7'",'i.P.,, .,f 4.1 •• 1•1411y...,, 111,i, 1' ...a":",...,=. .... ........".......=e.....,:" I S.'.-:"..f ..-.2. 11-A.-- 'r''1".". CC"14.1.'.°15 i) ..Stt.:74:r.•.:::4? :.•;. %.-... e .- :.• ••••• ,,,; ' " ' ,"- ,...,,.:,,-,; ;•'; , '.,. 'Ail: LT, , I 91/909001 0i3 11111111111111111111"1111. .• • • s - • . . • • • •• , . • .. . . ••• •• • • , . • . . . . . 1., , I ' \ ., . 3 `.f ' a , !. v4 \ , rid ; 1 1 1 ; ' \ 1 11 +Jti t � � I i-� � 21 .. r l` .3• CJ'J>r a1•-r"�`N •1 . '1 la `� • �... � ^4. Jl .4 X I ` 1r ,.••l.I� ...,...l•Q.+•,` l 0. I l I 1 '�: r:d I�. PII •'..• 1,..t \ a 2 1. ' r. V f . ' ;Li! • `. ` �' ~ \ c •� �) 1 £) L h ey t 3 `1.µ / ,• 1;1 1•. 4 ►• `a • •11 • ` v,1. �• ley 4N t > t...... y 14.. .-' 0%!:1 i? ";:; 41 41 %. ' 10 1 41 i. ., .., • j• -66s 11 ;.7. . '„art•✓ ( 13 / 1 0I`` `Y (4 I 1 4I'‘ ,. I wl.. •0.'` --.."-- • t/1 r/P• '. •• „,‘:.. j , , \v•ir.410 - 1 l i . I .'I \,i'l • \; Q I/� . I Cam' 1 ) 1 • '1 it , tT �1ji ^ i I I .� s I 31 ' 1 1 I' .' ( i �, 1 ;1 • • • • 1 • • • RFCORUER'S NOTFS. !'OFZTIONG OF TFHIS UOC'•IMENT, POOH QUALITY FOR FILMING • • , • 80 10060646 . '--•T_•✓ 11 t1 • . • • i . w..�`••7 / r.• y . .. v :1r /r� I �• R M OMB r j� • S . . . • •. .... .. ►. ii3•CkaiNICL I•' j Lr ...m c.c.i►•o7 L�r.L}:••-7_^I / )•, o% .CJ.:, p.7 y 4. ...•r!C/ L.'.� • '•!"• .- T .._ .d. ►'7 C:_�G''.. 2.co. r r 7 I • ...• ••• -� C- ��'-Z1 • J'•.R'// cyn Jam•// •• tom= n . .� '; I.j ••. orc:7 C:;/ • II." .r • ._ . .. : —r7 ;••t17 1 .••1 }-�M 1. t.•• 7.2.-1 • i. -/ j • •l.0 •• 0 1 I �t ••a pI :_ .. K 1_____i_........ .................r........._... as.tr ..............., Lt----------...1.4. _. ::.- I.01"......7 .v.to 47,Z11, j 71 . • 4 • 1 ctt:r/ s!it t�•� — 7<07J•,09•/2 •r•7;r:3/ •ttr. it ) s /%=1 LL !/ • frig:rJ�• ,, tom, AP:[ 01.........5.1.-$: .- ....‘'.% z▪. AI r,•y.;•V:I.....:JiJ3- =r • 71 1 11.{I E•N rJ7 r .:. ,_„.......---- 019/1k • - u - a.• 7 �. •a.r• r - — 1Z f — -- -- - ________ _ _ — 3 ••• • �4 •: sue .....• Y . a. • 0..•e• • •••. . • . •• .••• • . • AIL - • ••••.trim f.•I•,..'.•Oa N ••.... • V•�..I Y•Y a,.....a,......,. .• ••i•..1••1♦•0.1 tin,a;•.•1.•r•r 3•r.• ••:\ - •1.-•••/•:1 Y•i•r• ►••••V•r•Nara •••••I• - • . - •1/ a. .•..r l NO•••a••Ilia M.iH••-t.71 r••.••• •.. ♦••• ".. • •. I•.► ••I3.7.•• 30N::•••ice/fY•r••10111....•••I I. ••••• J.•.2,06.:.••..•ar••a•+of•11:•.410• •.•••.••I•••• . ��.I' ••••Y.a•:•♦•••••Om+.O•.••-•••• •.••1•.•••... -•• TOT «•..a:•.•Ole If.'•J f/••MP/Y••a.•..l'.,•••.• V•a..•:1• •••••••••L•:••ti.•,•_ ...1•.• ♦• •••.I•. 5 r'•��'r1I - u •.•; 16•• 10•fr f•ta•1 10:1.—w tl•..011••••••m/••• . 1•� •/••••••••a...•1 •• ••I••ti>n:•r 1•••1•ti••.•J>• - r t f I,•1•••• ••a 11.• a 1•.:.•••••.1••..e••M••-•-1•••••••• _ _ _ et.•• .•:........••.••• a.• •••.•.•:..••♦ •.•1•1..1t.• ,.-; • ••t•••• •t1.•:I.•.•.•••5 A:31 J.•1.-.t •a.•al• - . ,..t , - ••.• ••.:•/•:t V.•• 1•:I•..6••a.1__••••••. •••••.••h - •^r+ ••I•.•••17•�T.,•• •••••••♦•a•v •aT tt.. •f/••it\y - _ ' ••• •• ••a. 6..11•• ••Y6.1 4•.••a•••N•-•.L• ••.•ri t; _ - _ , •.- .•I•.J'•'•♦•-•1...,.3>1.1 1t�••M MI..•••••• a.•.• -t • •-.•♦•1.•• wN••I.1•• ./.•h•••• • •••••i •• t • - .J•�.1•I..M♦ a 1a1.. r•t•.•S•N•:•a ♦r•1• •, ‘ h -.J • •.J•••.II.•••.a.y•••h:••M•i•••�•••••ie••M • . T .•F1, - •••• •.1• ea.....••ea..... via ? M ow••:. a.y • •••.• . :1••• Iran - •� .>...-•..•.••• •••I•••••. ••IP••:•ya••••••••• ./ • - •I• •..r 7a... ••:•.a•4••••••.•••.♦WO J M• - `' ,• w _ In I••as:• •• J•1' •••1•••.)N.••/•I• • - :more •. .1•••• 7 I♦ •• - Y • .•.•.N•1 • � r ...•%I• •.•♦, •• ••••. .•• - g w."•' T _ o-- .. .`_ .T Via :., 7a ..ai.•.7....:. •'v • ).:• • ..1 // " r;-,r ;r. .•• t ?i7 •I:7fa ' ',' d • - r a' N 2,C '71 . . , N / �__ __- __------ 1G - ,-_-_:-'-'gf ILIC .1 A . '...•1•. ').. i ..t. r •. Z.. el ..t. •• tr. •. •.IL'.t• • -i• . Lin :.. ..--• a .• :. •1 -f. r'•':✓i t � . . 1 _ t - _-•: •1 ... 1. . l ale •. ... •. . .1 t. '� � ems . • .l •• • / .t•• ..,•...... ......._ •:•. a • 0.....a -r • ' . 7 • ••.• • •1.•r • ••,..• ..• a •••• ..• . • A 1 7 T x % C�r V t►• .• .• J'• •• • •. 1,..... : • ,. ••• .: •.. . • ••'.. •.irl- • ••• •-. -II. •• •• • ' •. • Y •.. :J . ••.;' . . ... : • . •• ••.; L J• /'.. 1 � '- . ..1• •• •f .• •; • • _.i_ • : ..•f. ... • •I• . • . ♦C - r �. . .ft- /l.••• .t Jo.r •• ..• t• • .. J.. • •.: .. . ••..,:: ^. •. .. •...' . at.a.• •..3..: • •C. .•.. .• ••: •.• •. •- :•' • •. • .i l.♦ .. /J••_ ••. an. • •.,..". 4•. .• •.• a. • . ...C. • 4 •• .f..•. tam• ....'ale .. •a..•. 4•1 !•a_ . •; Ir..•a la..+ to a• .' •• C••: •. •i 11 tim LA• a-U. .a. :.1 ._.. a. t:l AP I' -.._0 • -j•:•. Mania 46ilL•adta• L•• 11ra• •>•••. ••a Ct•1. f ._ •• 4•1: alecor t1•aC IC*•••t:T w tr: a • I .. w•• t •.11.aa. JJdtr 2•a::•••ammo ate...•••• ••ti' .7✓ Is ' •.a• ./ .• •:Y.:.• .•. •R• .!•a.a. tti: •O O.L1C • ••3 la. ••. C•.••• •••• r: a e -1 4.'1. :• t•• Q•:,=..= . •••• ...+o..• —•► "t at (^,•/7 •:..•t ...1.:•..:. a.11♦tt.• fl •t' ♦"t A Imo. •.a•• t.. 1 bra a--t•• er {l•.I.') • Le•• a••la iRl: s • • . C it. ► t. ora e-aa C.. • • .1..•• '.-L.. Yf'`V ••••1A. V a• i"PI*arils Cob •.) 1►:l ••• an ear.• •lt+(_yi.,att•♦ • 1)... J•• r a • ♦J•..V. • il.:1 •.>:S 4:*al :•44•71.• '{La..••AUK 11144•.. 1:L C.• a 4...: ••.•♦ /t: :: •• •.• a •1..•.. • •L.•t ••• J . ..C.• • .1.1.•.•,•a• .••. ..•-• t •• .t.•:• •a••\ •_••• ••• •1 r..• • • .•• • IC:• ♦.... a...� S. J•l4.: t• L• L •1... •. ...f: • • }•i • •• .: .1 • 7 I. I. : •......1•••..ill. 4. a• . ••1 • 4.•1 •••:..••12a .t_ T:.• • .1 ••.•w •Ilt •Z?'♦.•• .J► }". a) ♦/•_ r• . • -• •T• •_•b •' • 1tYi •: C:.ra• •• ►•••. ...0 -• a. .••ll •.• S. .J1 • ••..... 1.111•....07 l.. \ ...• •• 4•1 • a3•••••1.: 31e• •• . • •...• ... .t•.• T•..•l • • i ua. J.• t. •.•• • . • .• s••w .d• r. r Y/. ..•1 • 1 •)ta. r•1 •••• •%. t.t;: • I •••`••••••.• , Sr. C. .♦•• C. t•t• •.. 411•;.1t... • 1.:' •.• Oa 'L•• •I 01V.• .•.. a •.. •la..:••WI. •.. .• 4•. •• ??i 5 1>•..Ir. • ..• "Xs 4 •.m .1•1 •: :. 1 •.•♦ ••: Y• • •• •••••a •'•:!•./ •••.a -r••...•• 01 J•- as t•a l3 ..... -..• • •••..•. •• •: • . M.•••••.C• • ...WI. •Na .•• .• .•4 a r �..1• .. ••• •• ........•.. • ••.1 Cr C.• •a..�/-a ♦'•• IC1.11 ....1• 11• '� • • •• '.... 1.1•••• • •.••J• C••• OEa._a♦ •.. Q. 1la• a •.•I A . 41•• tG • • ••1•.M• .S•% N id.••I•t•. :a.i. 1s ♦.•• • t•.1 .1.a • •.. w :• • •• 4...44 Ufa:al •...:•.•••• a.•a.... >ta .1 • • • t•• a f'••• •I.h• II 411•a.*.. •a•.•.111 ••: •4J.''C •a.4040•• A ]••:)••••: • Ir• .4JSa0/ J7 \ -"""..--..............._ -------------------------- -3 76/,377/ l '`"' dyF+`t a7,F.yl•4r: es,. .;-f w•••C� �'•._�x.:x lifoN-.7t lAili" _ ` " .,,.. ..:-...' i .. J 1t. `(G^C y11-tei4i 1 — L�iW���4 e-+. -N .y . l''-.13Y{ Y--e .' If:.•.Y V".. ' a a i i ^.+rc .' a�rT'� ^c! 7 , .. -:4 :oRDINANCeNO 444'7 i :80r12�N ,- 4?42 .n y •R`ECD 6 00 ..1f _ } „,AN ORDINANCE..•OF:THE CITY OF RElgett „ . �, i is ' t =y VACATING A.PORTION '0F__PELL :,PLs'Ii �- AC 3-8Oq: .� ,"7'{i _ " TERRACE ASSOCIATES): g ar" Yw •: " ti .< ..c_.__� L."....:._. _. ..a ,r•�. I Q WHEREAS'a prope -ietii of fot vacating atpo" i`on of 01:1�y,THI �. v 14. '"hr �v <.�r�: Jb L: 'i`3J^..�+• �v`�"'(-'. '* _l•; -u� xnD,r.N- • t. -du1 filedT the C let ` ,., ,•.,: c— _ Renton, King Cu ',ont Washington.Was y -- .. f1 on or,,about- Ppril 30,Ii980 �ands=�aidrpetitL4n havifS:been=mine t+v_ _1_ <y, ' �'sa5' � _ -.�..r,�: �rT•' s :,�C"� s- tr . . � rJ . ' °• n' -owners- representing more than two thirds cf.�the propertyr � abutting upon Y�lt f .. �,.� z ' such street-sought to be•vacated. and , 'v�' ' i s~',�*r-°-` '-„- r'{� y` i. j. WHEREAS the City Council by .Resolutson No 2335 passed and- - -•.0. Y . .' :. -.. ' ...�., - ' T tis cif-•• approved on May:19. 1980, and after due investigatiod, did fix and '' - ate.. i `-- determine the 23rd day of June. 1980. at"thehour of 7,8 i00-P M •n the - .tite City Council Chambersof the City of Renton to b^ the time and place for a public hearing thereon, City Clerk havin given due notice' t d . - g _ . . . . ,-- _ a-• te of such hearing in the manner provided by-law. and`all.persons having . b:', been heard appearing in favor or in opposition thereto; and : - WHEREAS the Department of Public Works and the Planning l T�" ` a�cydr�u2L.� cf the City of Renton having duly COn. cered saidpet_ticD `}s for saia vacation, and having found same to be in the public interest t and for the public benefit, and no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from such vacation; iP>_ NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, . ;;•^i4 WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ... f SECTION I: The following described portion of street, to-wit: s77.� ;c�' See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY VACATED SUBJECT to an easement over, across, Cr.,. uiaer and on all of the aforedescribed property in favor of the City for i-Y . _r:1:r �n.7 rol,,ted purposes. r'~. SECTION II :he City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of E>; li -5;,-.. , . , . one-half of the appraised value of $ 1.65 per square foot to Petitioner- �f Owners, said amount not exceeding one-half of the City's appraisal _ . of the right-of-way interest herein vacated, and such charge being , reasonable and proper. . FILrD, of e [: at f uest Ol �1: z. 1 .,... _ ` r i ;%'/ 1l G!L-1 i ee/,f. .fit • i tic 22 E =` J (; ,� !G. �� ` ' • f ;i' JY1_ u-Ur. - Y. - - --ti- ,fewa!,--.5 ytiso t•-:7• wwnw1•1'. r v..•n ,.:r;, ( ' ,r ,, 1,,.4 . ary .t N„ r '. r�1 I '.'. "?••' "fr4—: rAr. It "j;r}' � $ , jP).; F::.-1 , r ;; 3 ' • ..''4 e• . , .}1 � .n l �f. y> ',1 %1•►..T1' r , a �? { t ,. ', ., `' ,, FYtt,,I€ ''� ., 1/4 1.'• •,'' " .'tar ktU � tl•J',. : :..•,• r l£1•1 . v••:,t . -: • ,'1..• K •�1f1 'i••� . rr,` • •j: ,y4 l I •M1 i nywy`•1•. . r .��4.. . . . ,!'`..b+ .ii0`d fLt! k 'N .. .ir,l , ; ., 1 r' .r r'xfr " �+, 'c'V' •'.4114' 4,• 1 .. f!' - i•i i} ., .T,:: ,.;eg• .w,r. rK'. J e,K4,4°$t%If14.', r,A axe:? aNMa Y 1 rlr i C1.w�.i iisommimrli imbeSwi>YillRa+`mi ti t iwom,suar,w�iL..i:: ►Or�.�1ii'il.er. ►,, .wt wi;,ai t' ' f.,N'''''''s'04 kl! 'r /t .5 Y _ �. .y1 t r ser+ .a 2'i) t ��r f-G{Y, ,n� 4 N�rIE�}r r,; ; .4 j4 s1 y�. ,•1 1 ° ru'Wj 1 yz t• , +/N :t .! ti' ; r n }i6 t Cuti J� ,1 u 1 01. r S 5.4N,,.4 r 1' ...,1r� i1',1?@ ' ra , tk,,p4;.i I Jl }A,.}y7..'�l',.j' y 445- Ofi 4j: y�y r8" . • 4 'I� •W �1}N, f"yr . ' rI •4 .. th'1iY4 Fl t ' " \ 'ttf rf 2,1.0 {2:` u IUd r X }VV 1 c �1 sy • ...,..,..„... ..,.. ,,,...,,,.,,..-,. . ,.,,,,,, II': 11 iiii.!"I'li,..4.;',0•„:1t1Y-.. . 03 • •••••• . .„„,,,,,,...... ...,,,, 4.,.., • .„,,,,„,,,,,„;,.,„,.,„ .„,,,....,..,.... s , . . , ..,7,-.47,44,..fi .ta'''.I ,. if.c,.'' 1!kt" li.i..,iiiiiii.,..Tir.ift:,!•ti 4°..,.;.;.:.•::. .:'. .., . . 4v .L i `l� .�I',y xrr . '41 re.� ‘ ...vAls 3 i..,,,14.4 1,...,,, s. liv't...4�I �'+.4 �'�. ht 1"4a.�{�ol,e;4.1 q 4,. q't� •. -' f :if 'O .C �s • t; 1 } ` l op , ° 1 . �.�`;_; !t*+,. �p ,.�.¢ O. e. r�r by ;k�x: ' eiO h1� r O o, • t•11Ny107 t�„ • r0 1. r Rbi. hr ro• V 4 2 >:''Er,Mj:9;�lrali 1 ty �4, r r , ' O 'j•l....t [It -rM xrlia., ,i•r 1 V}1 . t• I W • . 4, 0 u . •.0':i-,,.:.i.iti:-..;;',4,,:,:',•;: ,,,',:. .--'::-;4.....•;.. ',:;;: ;:. •.., .- ..., r1 N 7•,IY • yteil ��r • yi F 4r. ', r W e • 0 • t' = •it i'r10 6-.,PI;7,.....-ki r 7 Ir1 W . r W H <1 .Olk 6Igt.•'•1. J r4i 1' Vl i� i0`M*i t p4 tI r'� 1. . V •r 1 ,�y (.� 1 , •• +u1,F 1 a t. cn cd y,.,,,, 4i'1f r .�~a� ;t4: r1�fi yr. l3nob.4 ,.-,• r .b • d a yp q ,4644 , .64., . . c , , 40 ,'�i. 'y,r :47 0 1 R'w 4 4 O i } F i1 `,'ti'fYlry. r Fl1} .:1S� i.r !. ;. '. r+ } 69Lu I Z I OA ,`(1� 1 it ' 11 : i ', ,R t 1 t 1 t•.'t4.. . '11' %rfNi ^t' °•}� F7e1iW$1 .j'r'r F,'..•ia..:o.. ,';.4:''.a.•.1,, ,: •' 1 �. � ;.,t,. L •••h.1 i, ••. . ear:,: ,-; ,yr ,r, � ' x i'.!•••..,-;:::,,••,,,,.;: :.•,•.i .. „ ?• . ' • -;',-':;,•;'' ,15.':.!.!...4;.41I.,i`•',Iff?.414',;!Jifii"#'6;b1,31, .I';At';'‘..,144.24treVil.o.4kc. '44• ' :'./ . " '.. , :'k: • : ••':.-/ ., ' •••,,.f:-. '''.:;',+:1c:!..: $ f?..?..-.•ci.:;,...iia,:iewet-i ri,i1,-i.-,').'",-f..kcif.t:.:::.,,s,-,'3,';': ii.:. ,:•itioi .',•, s.'',4. *:e.:4 i.'i.4 t..".,'4,1)04V;i1...!,1',,,c, : *:' ' -.„.n.J.,-.. -,:''ii.,,ile•.,-4,;-4,61.i.,04,e...,:,4,1,,..yt,v,,,,-,,..„4,-,,,•.,,,,2,..: .,... .,,. ,•,,.t, ,„ , . -rw, ,. •..,, I `,..,':. '' '..,'1!,'. '''.•I' 'z' .1' 1141'.'"tt.,.'41t'''. 4t.IgAlkl gtlift'41;;;i44;' h.-Pt..4e,i'm'iii , ...kt,.,i;4,,;/ ,,,..,i,,,,z,7::-4 .,,,,, , ,z s..,,,,i,e,,,,et;t :_l ,;,,ig4AKilli',...‘,ift,t,00,47414.4.4 14;,t' "'"a' '..4.1Z.,gy.d •{* ••••••••••••••••••••1111••••••••••••••• ,,,,r.4 44(' • ,„,,„; ..,,,, .,t....,„ :•••1,00 • ••• ••• • .111•,,1!1••11 •II••••••••IA•., .7-re°, IL . ...-:. .i.o.1 I •••• ff.;••••••••••'''''''':0:••••••*".M•••'..04'40...."•••••.: . I: 0'•.•':-1 ...- •'' ' *V • • ";'; 1?.•e.; eV, , ..., .0 ....:‘ . N,,,41,4:.cmzwoot , 14: / ..•••••••.••••41•••••••••••••••••••1.•••,, . •,.:r.,,,.! •, , .. - •• .00 A 0/4 •,III '''.:,.. ..vt. :•-•• us .11) LI Ye! 1......L.8:le•p • 4•1 11.1•••••••••••••11•1.1.1.1.•••••GO. , ;),7 7„AO 0„,.;•tA,y . . . . . s . I••7 .1 r ‘. .0..• . ie..:•."..1 -1:1;, I.:1",•r.:;,•-•,, .;•,•./ V,/ r.:;.1:1") •V.1.11 1.7 /r....cr.:/11.....7 .1. ".'- •• •••••• ' i .•,o;P..ip:,!!,:t11.., ?If 17.e.:.,,..,1, __,,.,, ,......, N . 's• ... _., .•s e i'••• .1;., -,rtzi y.4'.,f:,e;v . -•""• ,....,.;J i•i.,,, r•,,, 4./ • 4.i... • .,.. •••,...g. .,, i .r .. .-: '' 1.-1 i, ••••1 i dj ikke •"oil .............7 ,„„...•••,,r.f:4: •'• ii.••,•‘•::,.1.4•,:04 ,.. •- , ,' :., : .„ . „-': il,z, : .: ,, !•• : ir.- i ,...- &at 0.41e0 s•;4.-mc ;V.ei••,1•••I 1•11 ell ' '.•'•:- : ''• • ' ' 9.' ,,'• : ..'' : '".• .. : .,:r; :: .1 r . • • .„ im.o..„,..12 1ir 1:44 117 * • , '.. -''- 4,1•1,* '..". ''.. '.' ': ' • . %•f: s ., . ' I d r••••;••41,7 4.-•7 yo-eir . ,,• . ' • ''.', ' ., i , rli, ,, . .k...• tercriri)0.lp••••?•,,•••., • - •Pp f,0 ,' • : . '!,',1, ..7 :1,:' • I ' • ' :•.• s', ' ., 41 t. I,: , ) . . f ,1)./i•:,1 A i a..6.1 ,1' .,•;.:•' Y. . !,: ,, . ; V 44.I., ,•0 .,:, •:,,,,•t.,•' 1 : 'I....,...'., cc " • • ‘ : 1. . f., et.10,/•,,,,, •••,v..tiln -,.;0, -,... .••,..-......,4 I , - ',; -*,.', . , ol* ,t'• ... •;.".., ••• ,.. il / I .r.i.•‘-it:1 1 ...:f , .#6'100'011?•/04$.1 '0 r .'I 'r.. •).'• I f ,• ,. -;i:, . ••' 4••• , . •I t'‘\/ '.'... ,. l'''•'••••-.,.•‘*.i4 ai, rt'''''''''''.' ' I i•• * ,:3L' ',1 . •II 11,./.•• hj .it,I.S: p . ,...•:;, ,;:,, , : j.s.,, ''..•.:''',r,-.- : . -;'''‘ ..i , • • /... ...._....... 4 ........_.) , .1 • • ".'... :',... • 17. i 1-,... . ' :V.,'" :7 ' V ' I ., .•••••1/!g.I,/* V* ' ...... ............... ••••••?,.i.••••••••••, ...........•••••.• .1.,, .7 S. /1*.Xe .1 • : at lei/ .7.1,•41.74 . ,. • it..: : : ',, -) • 5; it 4 A _., ., . ...-•- - --T-......-,s; 4- - - --'- - -• LI, ‘ ,' t t..r , 1 , . . . ?in o.d•rirdi.••40••/.- ,.:• , . '• ‘ ,- 4 •ke . . -,. i . ) • 1 #1 . . 4‘e ; -*. ', ' 7 ,,:t 'si i"-: ' • . : "' 0 ': ..• . ..1114, I°9 7 0.1,01. ieq-04 ' ' !' .' .;..'i').• .-I t; !‘'.' ' ' 0 ' li, •,.Wit Ad, el$C• * .,. 1 .td • z ..v.i. I* • r ..*- ...4.;•• * or•44......4,...... 04 . - , 4..... ''G 4 AiI...ar.j.47 -I ••• -!-• '.."'." .X ••••••••••• . 0 • (.• Ille 'il A 4** ••••• i••I .•0 .. ., .rr../r en/:,- .. '•••77.4 I" .0., , ,....# ••••! . l• if I •' <et.-..... ,e,; p . .........-----' ., ; ,... ; . ir,........,:,..,...„,, ,.. , . %.‘-' . _,.....--..11.11 2q1)1 . ..:.-i / . .•-•---N \: . (;?") ...1 .--;--6:, • i:, : •:: ................,.._....., . . • . ._• --.4 ....----is ,,,....-51ricq' i: • : :.•,4.•, : i 4. ; \ .• : ...- 1. i "•-•-, . . • '. ..r:, '','ff, 7 ;, • i •pi-I- -,....,'i.,. .,::,:.,i'..1%,.1..11-!; ?1,7,.,".. ..4 • . , ,,,„.ivi ea 17%1' vrp •. t...., s.... ,,, , , ....-•or•I N.od do '. I., C\ I • I:"... '4.1, N. 4 • •-•••••••1•1', . ••••"?..:":.: ....."..... 'iti,.'.1.L.-..,•;'i."'C.'s di,T !..'. :..: '4'1 ••• ' re 4.`,..tr,. s•;W Sr. i. dr l'' ,„••p 0,,,.....,/, .. • .••• .•I.• I.•••• ••••• 1...•••• ....ova• :..t;' ‘, ; . .....,.,,.. . ..• '''. ,Ii• 21 I I/•••••,./..0 ' •'','••••4 t;:•••••••••:':'.1.1,••••::0.7%Ir.....i.7•.•.'"t ,•,,. ', 'b.,j...firg.• , 1: ,,,* ' (/l''' 1°71 .r:.•, , 37,:r 6 , •.',."' "••'..:‘'...."•.•" ':41.':.r..i ' :'t 1: '' ' ' 0 Z..... --.... ,;',"-- .:,. ::.!:.:„.i.: .., ...,..- .:N•• .•••1, ..;,‘j! ., ; : ,: •••• lie 1, •'''...1.•r--..,..:.;;:-.:.-...-,:;''.•:•.;«XI ;-: -I I". . - ' , ' q -I. Tesirl i --------1 , * ... . .".V.:.1‘;::.•.=.1,1=`1.."4:.t.t.'.:••••...i ,, , , • • ••• ........am .•••.-.•• 1. I,••• ..... ••••a.. row•••••••••••••••••Ion... 0...•it ••• ,, , e.• •oft......••••••••ft Ow••••••••• •••••• .or. : . '1..1 .• °X d "*...•:.*:,..,!1'.:••••:.:•.:.:,...;:v..:........ei.,..7., 2, 4, , 7i ' '........ '2•:••1C'i.::::T,.•.7":::: '.• • • t . 4blar"•-atf•-• •.. ••••••••••••I•0.•40• to,maw••••••••••••••••••• , ••••• ••••• •6.. ••••or ii.•••-•••••• •• •.••••• '; , ••• . I/ 1.•••• ' • . /a*/ell •• ••••I•••••••• 1,...•••••• •ant 11• .yr. •••a , ..;:..."....-•Vr.,;;••:'.%•'.....•"••-:•.•::••,";:'.••":.".::: \ r \ :. X /1;e'11,% •••• I ...an••-•• ••••••••••••••••10•••••••••• . ti'• ...;,",..-•:::,-..11.,r...:•.,,v.:....:.;'..t"..%:::'::i1... , , ". 7.4•1.4 9L0?I ?I 09 .•ri 7,, .._.... ii:•.•,v -•', . . ..::: .*.:. . . .-:, .. ..:-?:•,1 . ....---°° ". ... A)•V, i V 109,, Of ,er,d' 1-o i .i, i ^, ......-:.....•..1 1,3 11.1•0,••^I'IP....... 1414••'•.18,0/(:), ..,.. ; ....., . , ...-.:7--rm,:;....-rp-• ..,. ..•,.. . • .•,-. . . .1 ..,,t4•*'•11,,,oh•tc,••,:.K,••*:,,;4•0•01.1,I 1,,.:4‘...,-.41.,:).,t,c,4.1,..-• •,..f.ti;lolocir.,,,n"441.:01,111404410"vi...11)10401"4. ''',• 4.•••A''' •.',. .": :I-'•, '4•:""' '''' ...,.,‘ i.,,, ' • .. ,,, • 1" .1,4,•it',::•,', .'••!.4 !•41q4,,,h',i°.1,i..• '• i.•• •'• I•••":)-1 1 ii110111111111011 . . 01.111111.1.111". limomiammisameme inommomigninxiiiiiiimmoinimmiimenei So VIIIINIIII10111 . . ,,,,,k: i'l,,..('• ...... '' . ., ' ' ' ,' ::,,',‘ ", • ' . ,!1; ',''` '!, , 'J I ' ' . ',• •••',' '•••••..>.t r.ri..•,. il.,.....i..... *...co ,o 1•,+. Al ,. ., i j+p'1 t#h.'irl� 1,.1 {'ty„v.; ,,, ?„1\::, +.'p!4•t Y±' !". 1..•s.i i, :.arr• r i ril*,..t �pit, wi'' +i r.r: r .,i. r a VIP .C,,'7 Tv� R`• • .,. 1' ,A irk .a..YrT' ,.t%M1+'.1Ps sM•i uK A�' v:•� {'.r I/,' '? S.t �r L+Y{ r ./!i r..d1, Z! it'i �{S iP ?i?}81 Q5'�tb, fit ? 1 .t7i' '''/ . u 1 a "• 4 ;1..•1 �, /f,• ,13if;1J.. E�,q'��` r`[ L 7.. .1' ( r - J/►` l �7i'f f s� r�r ••f[ ���, ^l I'\•� I f ,, AL'!"M la. f •.�• • .I'!i i. ,Y,. r r 1,. �i5 { 1 d1 ..I f'i'trt 4 .r' r.,f...._ ¢ • C sty,;.t tf' r '�`1•�i;,i�A�.,„�����{i! S >SYJ! 1(a. ice" + :.5 '•e t ue '�` i 'In...,4 - kit.R• I Ii4%/H-1}ka' 1 r, T 7 + +::i.t°y0;;tb�rl)..' r,}'!► ' y1 1 . 5 ..y `. _ )"' e. ry�[�'�'��}�J�yr,,�r(�!..�► .}� • f' ;, r 5 I� +i'Ir•�:{ ��� � lif ,',.. ~,, 0.,- . 1t� A I..);4..r j 1k �••Cs' Y4•ri'lt�1.4.r ..4•f 1•.1; Vl'''/S','. ft!., ,,l!•'-1'� , ''.Nt:)YI(1 )°� .•It;�r�ti , • F•• •1. V `y�aItt.Ytc 6v:•..ti rwwl�: ^y :Y ..';� .� a .• /�✓d•/mar C ti C'f' /irJ M•w,/11 , (r✓'I1h 1 ��(r',. }, 5 I �y n t!! ;'M epee*40 I.1 ti r r'tr f • •M. e�OT» •S,r, .�J►.M Y..M: ;M1 ri i.i.µwor••+:� i s •- I !:Ar1 Iiti r ��— "1 P ili r,.r 1i5 •� 2 r "r ri. ' � % .,.$'''"°•""•.•••.I IMY,...� wri»E ,1q.f • ', )`: • 't'. i1; • d,' .;; :.�' 8o 2I207,6 /, It , I Y..:`r ♦ .wrli•'..�►w'il.w=•r i,i ieu••..•"►•'4•44••• • •:�� • •'n •r i•` . �i/; / 4 1 ' ' :4 .. r: • �� '.•�+...r rir• ►•.•w..«•r1' • • �jt/ ; e 5 '*7 :11:,,,ile. i) w q1.••.••r b r•rr n. ..►.•• .ir ► • ,. 'I }/ C, % , 1i.' t /�' trM~~I'�•I•►•I•M•r1• •r�M /•V 4r{ - . I • roff t I••1r1 .�•.. .I ../� • +y� I. '•R y�►Vw� >/ a'4 1 L :•'‘,:.:177„:.74-.0,:f. J •r1t I !•Mt i•., :l' • /l 1 1 r 7t• 1`' ' i' •r. )r _,;,t,w11 ihl� �/vi•1''h.� r rr•� .•....tt r►s r " i � �•� ,. e .�.', t i. l L nt:` ...' A�1, A� �'- • ..•i••r� wr:..'.� •:+ � il ,�/ :; � tT;. !ww•ri1.. r••• •�f( .a�p 7 •w"rw•.rr� �r �•r.w r• • '' • t tl n1 >•t �,!1}•, ' 6'...A .` ;,�� % '•j�• ti:.� w► w•wa•'...trj'"r• i, ' , / 1 , - S.. .. 1 yZ r ir'a�t is Fh,r%? . - �'�' + 1 • ..%I+ .i r ► r.••.•.i:.• •.w •.r l w • s.....' •i:''' > '.1,�` �, 1t • . ► �}j' , ,i • w..1.1 Fwr.w�.��►,i.i.iw'ri «.I•'•..•. - j MIS. .AS'f�• K 7;r'µ)C� �,ctt •t i ..7!:,r • iv.j t 7 e !d A r •,.�•.•.w.^+r�.w • // I: Vg' ,,, f„t yr2;�r e: ,'.. . $ Ci+ 4., , � �— + • .i , +,.r.d 1�1�Ih�`�;41�'r ..;trzjS' � .• H) yj"i 2."•Irr�j.:w bM . �� t 4NU t` , / t u,'pFi�. ri.M. 1 .f+n• ;I .,,.-� . , 5'. i, S•i1•, •.. •a •..1it..�:..,.i• 1 ,,F.„ , t ` i1 !: r, l.li„. f •..yysv. • :,,z•.,rlr.• .17.jr • tl 1- ii L t ei:.--1 r. ••h..�1 2,r�jt yr�� y'i • •,�/.j.II i.S, � r t , 1714 . .�• `- 4 t• rd <i,. 1 it rr,tiij•':S,r. iF�f. 1' t< ~.�► "••'a'.• ••:..i�i i•4•rr.ii ,• i' � • }r1r, I. •I , ;�• r� 1IL,�i M -�'�I•�, � ..'t• . y {..�•�••�,u .O••r .w•I,.....{ i�'3!i .i 'S.: a f�'r�., +til F ,``-.'�J.4";`• ^S.••i.W w 41• .. dr:�-,., is ��,.. •,•�'ii. .;. . .• . d '—',. Lill[. ,"A'• Gil 4, ); ctr, •• •�,;� at rti #, f*, p w�!!"f ...,M .• , •.Jr •6.� ,Y't. ce J'w �'`/ �.u' \ ♦ tiXCAl:��• /rr i r• " .1 r�tr� �q"{,' i,j:...e,: y1 �r �i �ki-4 . ♦w1 'j:f vr+,:t••.)�,. rl, /r,v 0 „ ,i ,o me•irt R , $•, .... .. , ��' 'f! � >trM:,,,,,.7......4:k.7,;.NtitNitinfijog,,, !,• N •"r +r .Nl.Mr��Nr}j:•y4✓$p r.., i ! i,-,t.��s�. 4if t4� C i r 'i..xlyls�f�'(.yq, r ^ ,r"l'• �) ),. ,'<: .r.:... `:l 1t 11 •44 �7. -,,.. yl'� lr'1", E. r . Zt '� ` it y""rr �" �`t' �� ' .;.,�. • „ i,' l 7 , , '.7 � •� `;it: 1 , t : t. r. 4 t k ri• ''',-i�� fir ~ ., ta+ �sf 1, 1yyMLiQL ' !"t:' ;5{'71 r;',�,.I� w•i • , , t h,►I �} , : '•t `�� r ✓ a } h ,.<'; 6 yi' t +I::{ �.� •.. Q,'`1':'• , ..1,4J ;k. ry ��i ��/ •.+lqq' �. � r r<�':r �. : /f 'j(• '4 ,r Fi 'Olt' / t ,k jF�'s•t•AI. r �• •r•� „ • �3 jC,` ..I #F t i .,r � St:t�,V f`_�� , l . ' f ,,�tii� .�,/ • ''i I ; t:-.r •r ..'i` .!.i l,r,i ) t w r , Jr 1 t r.9� ' Fi'w r • TT •"1 ,.���,{��ft. � 4:1; /dry. Gar ,:s ^t'��: ai` ., ,.�',,�! • :1., 'Al.! V:.ri�:f'4.a�,t��) •5 • "�a'h • N ,{ �Y her''„ ) r ;} - p ? ) �l:ie� :.}.rl.h :s iY't/ r rt, l-'i) I ••cy'.4r1�MY • S ;jV .1. '7 I ! [e':t,' <yt't' ,l •Sr !,T4.. - t .^ .V' Fh ,;7 ,�I ,Nl� .y; ,. 4}...kt,' r :. a, .It�. 'Iy,.• t %ar) ,a.. 0,i:' .r .01•',t 'Ij,JY •li ;j• t • r i�tq/,, . " . NI.,,A,1p i 'd �.,ir. 4..r.i.. r t { ti ,I 4 ,r l.r► -;,•,,,- 4 •4(i''11r{;;,:i.Fy',V-1�'')r'ry., i jt'<' ,� 'r4 i . �y. ,; ' `�i} -i} !t'• a k , � � `:� =rr...�'J � 1-.1 t t ,r 7•„ y•6t''�•;�y ',:•1�) �, � 'rl t'!b �1���iliv.it • Fe'. 1�. C". ,i:.:, r� I;•,tl,{7,'S!h iyi (!r,,; 'r 4f..:;• 14•'�. ',�_I� 1' , • r i'; `.. i�ay.r:.r.{,? .t.'�Aftr.s J t• t• Jet': �At,rYe�4,1,7 ' �{}®[ �' .e�„ Mr...n;llrlr }„tr+St''/ts,il [ u(04i., t; . `',Y; r. r rDlf • .Lt? } .J.f,,,A.1.+)'.�E .( (t:. •+�yh 1. Ij. ..I,r Si '7yrt,i� .i 1rFT '.1 •f1 .1n+ f,'�:�1M,7rt y�'yr .: .R .� : �Y., 'W r• }} J / cr-• •. i i.:y,. r r r /. / �i '�Y . 'J ?- µ. 4} :)ilfl 1 i,+tl /j 1rt.. �',<C,ik . 'fi i 4 t. �� l h_,S+J• I•:O►1 r. ✓ l' = y \ e ?- r �T..,�,:',� i' :'),iv h,Z.� .+�� <t yam'•�'.,•+k s i1� .'�+.'� iv 5 , R • ":.�'+ •I-/- Si/ � ►•, � a; :�� t 1• ' ry'� r y T 1 E+� rv,,. f 1 w A• ' �• t. ' r a ,'.t.,c. t i 1 u •:\'1 �y F'F+ %t t! .v^� -y + fT.rll' `t� 'J 1; S1 i. , ! I '+ .� • /1' 1k)'! dY•�.' ' > �- 4 ^ / q, • Y �Y 4f1� W t'�JF' Y H:te > + �.r t. ', • •.,5,' ) /I • ...t• • S Y a',a v l�^ K �� q L(x.. f r. .k 1•k , � 1•. t. ,..•-. ^ 1t((''' E^ t ` r If •.. `' i t, ►a�. .f Lf I / 5 ! r'1. ••�' i. -1' ^ '` { 'St e l t . 4. i,S t3 ..Gt' l 1 0/I.I� ,4•I ,0J 1�•',e .77 •• ;:kl r rl`• -'lt ,T Y ';,A f-ltt �jj 1 ; , l.t ' , • 1r IC' I ih"�JM;frI�rll,� i +k ,!� Y Y. 1 )1"er� ?*•5 } ! k! 7 �1 • t j it fi. t ' '••r .<I '.i `� ,•a..y.^�� •c. jf j Y. 7j.. t„r •,"1T • r: f Y`l r'•t •, .s t ,...4 i E� $�rr._• l .!,.i•• •.• ,:.. •" tr, •`/i t.��'./�, t1.•f5r YA '.I•.:,.i.5}iatl'1'n.h. %. 1`j'e,i • �, F•{, t "/l'., �, ..a'�f,.i.L �„.L ,. _,yN� t,n..w... +r" _ i''•`' .;i`.• ki .�i�SM,ils "t'.�� . + ,4.,; S 5 -�i,....:7.:�;tyt�r C6•, •, i sprat• .`l..,4,, . //HJI.i . ' ..... 4• r'�' • •lLAWy1yr'.:+I R 'Lt l`t•,niQ . 1}i7,Iii..7 r • ti' V irtvl L..;.: 'S3+t( • 7+L, X'«t "iiy�pvK}•' l: ( n .r ! ; ( ir, f j. ...„.......•...,.....„," ,a t Ef:I iltt y f 1 f. ? ,.. 1n••; i L. P•ii. i .1K (kr .. I'i }rF r • } ',►q',11)/ ar 9 1SgttY. 1 "1' d' t)' • 1. i1 yji� \? {t•. 1~'L r i t.. .it(�,1t r;. Ft r: r i II/1 Pr.3 . . it,,„;,..,,.�•• 7; .il•-it �.r•`ii ul ,.1 •C.. i �r��.'y'�r`q 7• • •�+. ti's f'+ �' !t•R •n ii. 1 t. :r ' ' '/ I//• J ., ., -►�1r,: r..1, , r-.�;+;r.:i�'e ',F .1•l. F„w,: r •. • Y 4'' 1`Y'ti r:y Ll.;,, ,Sv', ,} •: .Li. `.If'H 'H:�: -' �;•�'.,• i:r.,•i.n- i t1Y�i;j,t,•. 'f '41 1,.�` " • ; ,t a• '• / . a +�'.c/�". lv 45 t f j y +� f•iMlri 'j " 1 ��.d (. /.•{• �I iM1R r j I Y �r :i( . lmtr It{; ., •1 ,r .�?��'4�• �'�•N'.. � h,. ' I.II � I r ,i4 r; ,r ri.•iiYr'�. �,.fl tk�''•�r �, ,-�'.,'nr t ;.. v� �/It1. r i + 3,irt;1 73/;n h ..il A+ r .r r , . r� ,\ ,�7' O:T/)iI ,:1fr;-,t,er•N/I ,,';i• .Mt w t i•.? + ,+r c , r1 t .1 .tl: ;yid:a'hF r :r•• trf.( a'. ,'V.f` �^ 1'' 5 '' ( .;4i.d' ic,• ' r i� ,`"}!{ •i;:' r} °•,.. �'_ 9 t. .... • • N La .av l .'!� •• ;} f • ..T i" 0ii ?:' ) 41r7 1111-i1�i ,tr•4 rd+i r.�. lit it� ./¢.r;f H.t ��yk` r p t+7t �sMr r�4}'.''�' � < . P - r ;i., •' 1 � A•' i ,. ,".T { 't '� i t•,..F.7 t ,T'. .... �' 1 n,.vM, r p' '`f•:. . . . ni �> /i, ^ilrlJy.: �..• ,,l,.,.=0,. �.`''•yr .0 l a . •1 •p.,, .r.yt9 J 4.t,ji{{ r t .l`. t.._ +I,,p y P„"�:r,,'{ .t,c A r1 (r! •"' :e4 '* rl ,i'. ji27g.7.. 'Sr'.;', f, ;i'.47 ).i- l.'. `Y' Fi.. :.r . ,rz a•'A i' rli ` e �'� ,Ii ,i'!,�., r js -!li.i. i ? . ;`., " '�.7k • "lA�F 't 'S 1�,('.�''{. !d,r• t IA! {Y 'r•=�..�y}'•'• ;., F..• J. L` Tr..{ . • iN� `��. ,`;fir.'•;`•L'aL�, kt�i ,`i'},lfr ` 7'•tf5�i" 4•rJ !`1 �. ''‘.'• " -i , }F �.��,{{{{i.1�• .' R •s Jpe,,,J1 :,p2''rf;t : ,{ ,-.,;;,.�r)•i±Y',• 1 ,1. 1!.•:i �•'I,.S♦1. ..j �,li 1''.+,.,T•(0 ;l ,•�'tf;'- j}..�t? y •.,' !..••fl? k/.'i% '9 `i > ,R' riV., '�{. tiA '; J,{4 f��+f( 'S""'C•;9,+ p.i tr + ,,.r'.,•�.�! it,, w.�r_;,,.t♦.ri0roa41.4.4)�Ii'r'.„,,e 9:4-: t.' i i.174 r _. '4•. �;. '' • :,(," i., ',y ', vy 01.1 • 2 f 'i� :; , , y; .Y 'N}-/ l • '11I. •!� . t... '.fps/!J,✓/,.s3•I•, J + r A hir,: 'it ! =, ,t , t.. 1 5 P1. ? t�f+ fl 4, ft� 4 .� . F ,'{?I•.rlrlt, ":I•t1 I5 ,T.� V. .l.• 1�INof•111'w�+ti t s 'i s� .'+,¢+ �mi., i'.1 i ..• • • • iC ,JT, 3� t�•�r�, i•�• «Y�,�1 • • '.•�� a,..�••�..::.... • • _ "► v H►Il w.l •'�jlt M�ii} t'<• r ,', ,!>"Y .�,}, • r ,Fsb,� ,,lt„ G 4„,w,t tk,r:.N$1!i'''i`t •f.S/h'1 i,,:,4i; - .✓ •• `/ .._.. A. :.l,'/!'L'e .met•.'f,i;t/1►"t' r 't , ,i,�a r''a t I _a�t•r, i. , .fi Si .Vs.-J!l, •ti •t!,•••i4!/!. • }• k!Siiita14'• `�„ w 1C I ',- I �':, ;.As :t., t.. .i. . i.; •,t,t, 'r t,• f1 -. 'ems �J.{ jr:�l'i•. jjc yJf-XYr. r iKrf: r '✓�1'.,f:�/ �i .Ii•.!•Nai a geI,•y♦ 71' ,i1)X7t';ia'. t. fir, kft�(t,jjjl k, I. 11rr�.y,'[ H ,f' .i •!l/l�" 'I:•:i6 yy.pper� I C' y. . ,� ,1 tS,.1: . 7' .t. 4.• .i -vi Y • Irf. / I't"..:.,,7`Si.V .'4.1.•• +f'�./ •". . r• )i/ .ifji�' r•4jt•.,i I. • • r . • /w!Jlf iti= :.';%,:i?,,,�,k=R,,,,' I k �I'•oti.r, .,1 pc,.%�'1'•'rev, } • .'' :Y ' I 11,\I' rr H ''+ }„' 2' ;�{'r�•A 1, r ;r p..,• I^y�!S�.`�"ch,+i pa111ti }. .►r... • .: • .'i.I�:.I{'V.I I tI► / .�•J1 I �r'� � c r; ' .i yR! �7►111 ,t v`�t��i{ inn ah�tir•,,-. 1/• ft., •, , .fl, i "`fig.'!► �W041V, 4 d �,�� • R,_ii�wiirM:,ir"� ;) . , r <1roomes1�•cmArf!N 1►SGCC. W:, ;ft•tU..«•4r.�'"• n;...j ° ,''l'Rt tfirr,f,-- .;.} ,. ;01� A S.1 I it..... I++..�r'w r r•r•��• �. sir • {..t • , ! , ' .OGV +'i!•fv�i•'' F'1'n xe , r i l �Y} :, ! pia •� A.••/i' •• Ar•I••••►• rt•iw.;ti:jl rr�J• •.- , •.A►I{t►'r•M•tl+�,i r/1►/1Jt • id( Mkr•' r. q•. f,tl o , �. 'rf/� �. •,..,r i t. - ." •.l1cr• 4: VYM J'.I/I:AIA1.•4" ;• .�. t l'•!'E " r� I!l t[ 7 '0.- �ir't P ,� )1 ,(� •' i •I,•r ' ,L 0;, ,f 'r'i': I�t`,,y I 1 ,�y ..: • r�$'r� I. s��)Y'? ...'", 1 �I. •rSVA✓ r� 1 ri rti ' "sir Y:W�rr y`C�` <5 4 ..•5 S ` yf }, i! i ,1 i ••' i......•I- ••w;-i. :t. ,.... ""�'►'•I,l..- t^, `31>r'. '^•iy-i-(•t'Y���'�v/?ita�"�<(�]l�f.k'I'f •",P „at ,y�• ptP C 'i) F rrr r1 t... •I:.L: �•.:.L_'�•IF:r•.lt!• :. rs...tlu'r'-..6.77'iaLr':.L..!•.4if�1.L ANf1-IJ{i{�SW i1.11 f�il i "1.� 1'�� .f/:-�i. . �._..<, r.. '1.►.u.i•5.7 '•'r,.t.:. , ttr :71- g:r-i•'' 1 /-.�•/,j ►., f1. : ,t,f jr• r>,h,(v iyL:. h .. Jt r • .i, r. t i. ,, rt. .trya• „c'�-'1�yy .,1!!t'L V ..1� 'JK,�(t;;'� :4 .� YHA 1c:,iafy 1 X: y}' �y <r. 1; fr J Y' •r ' `btr�,�f' !�, ,� i/ r •TTt^".f ':r,. • •1WWC +/a`''•[��1 le 1 „. ;l ,4 'it 4 s, 74 ,., • iy • � rp. IS V , rr '�1.i'-.1"�:�. <e• r-'t•5••r !r ' " :iI ft .. '!•�� �' ,�,.,�,, `., 1, 13fi ��,tii'1:'tlti �3r ' �jh�a .try ,� , 5 1' t k rFA li. /. 1 t ,Ji • • •••4 VP 4... t *t i 1 ..., .d....,••,:itiy.....;.(.......„.riv.f...........,,,,. .,::-•,:f,t At• • ;' • •, ,, f•1 , ;;fi --:---.::., rft?,-'''.,,4,e,'''$•.'7'.16,d t'''• ---.' '' - '' i .6 I ti I • '0 6 .„ ft.% e. 11 '''013,e,f1L.r.........:0.r.:.• ......„..:r.71 orr.:0.0:1..r4.1..oj iii. .s.: .. •1.$; ...' I. .. ';,",..,6f,r,,'-'1,. .;,',-•,f. :!, ) •-,', . ,,,* , . . et *: ..- : ,• -- '',`(..,..76;;;;t#4--.74,14..',1 •".,..01.g.'.1,--•,v 41,04..'--,,i,' • .:11.T •'• • ea/vs•rt.. _: . -.. 1.4 ri • 1 I ,„_,,,, . ., ,. ' ,f c..tc. A.C.e.A...,.:..,‘,Vnri.hk;:. 1!...t,••••:.4, ;.,....,-i'r is: ,,,, ,',. ' ' •c:7,-•- :-:-,.,;, ;•.4....f; '•1•'ic::(4'1..c-. c•! 1 ...%: ,'• jo I41 ' 1 • ' . `,.1 :i..-;,,,': ‘•,,,,,...:••:•:1,..,:ri:r •qt,'1,.1,'.,! I ;*.- . • \ :L..: l'‘ "A. ' 7- ...';' ,,'-'..r.-- ,'''',i. ..1.,''',..;1,' 4;.' ;23', ,,, .. : • • ' 1 rs.IC. I I . I ‘11.11,...*- /•••0 •* •. i; ....;.x. - ' ,-. '!7-•-•:-.,•/,-,,;'-o•--27,•.,;.- -',.-4..-•,-.',•_.',.. - ,• -,',-, .-., - -, - , 1 g I l' ,..,',-,.•-•-'.'*;,"'-!.:4.-..!!-: ",.,;, -, '•''''' -:.::;_ :,-,-, ! •!, , • . . •.- , t.,„ 1 1 1- IN . .:,,, .! .„,,,..:;.,y,,g;,,v.,.!-;!,,,,,,.-..,„;-,41.- -,4,--,%,-,-,q.; ,,i 4', 'k:I..• 10. ‘16 ... , .: I,a .... 1 4--; .. ., ..- .-„.!,-,-,i.m.--.4,,4.1.11,!..,f...-,...:1;,:,,I;?.21, e!I,,:;:r,,,,,', t4 ,: '-• ,," : ot,„ i .-..g. ',.. '.•:5','.. -,,144e..71,('$$‘1?0':'-q"`*:;,;.'',i';%4•:,•,'C' ....'j,,,:•,•:.,17 4..‘,';,,;,, si ,q e„••••• I it ,••0,,,-:' - - '`j.-";,:1,A.;:ki,..i,,4',.:1•;tc,-4.4:74.1.45 .)?:1,-;:•,;.:s. .,'.,'.):::'...:,',.•:::':''.1'.i• ii. 'i . '',..• ,.. i t • : I ‘•1 ••;.4.-. : - ,,-."..,-. :r. te..,.. ;-; ,',,,e,..,'/,-,,V.9."•T'/;:: •' ...' ''.; :.,;4 A. 1 : ., ... ',.. '. " °-.:',Vf.,://z1, 6-,"-r.--- -F-i,:ci.:•'' ''i'4,43;-..t'.'•.'1; :•i •••-';`,'-,%:4-4- : '. ' ' -• 1 N ., .., • !...*;:t1.- .,..=, :,..,-2;',,;;?-*"..p..,,if.4?.,14,P.,..2,,;,',i,:i..., ..,f 4',,,,.... .. .. l'•,,r,,, . :: . . \ • . ..1 . • II I.• I. .'..,..'1, .':`1 •ss, I \ I \ f I r 4 ...... • " 1.- '-'.': -,,' It4i:)---ie-, '..0T01...04.i,,,,,ta.:-).:,-;,„,:;,;•: ,-'-,,,,,x.' I :t.'•i.•'-', . '••• . to% ;* :',' ---. .•'',.;., 1-4 -• '47. f• ,,,, r.,,,,--...,,,,-.;„....._...-,12:;,-„,!,,k; .,•.:,...., . , ,-.. ••• .''‘,;: .,''•..,,'.-,',., ;. 41 ill':::f•41:tq-i*? *sw‘,4:;7:'',•' '' • t I ' ' . tt • • ,... " • • /*I •,9 -%. -, :•4',..,•••;. ...erc 4.••!`"y••-•",.,.`.;:,,,.;r,cii,•,!r,i • a., 1,,.;, • :. I t •.. •••4.' 1 . s.....•, 'I S"'. ‘.. •'-,s,;,, 2 ,- r, .,tf ,w.1:ilpj,zt..Aw,t-L7:i!.:;``:./..• .,:4.;„t"?, : .i''..:: , ,61 . ,. • , ii ... "3 ,!;,,I.4,,,•,11,1 ,,, r,. , r.... r ‘ I ..m........mo. sA :-;-•••• 'A"':it.;1 1, ...e.i'i,4,1,,.,,,4:),4S-..,ty,s .': :, ''' ' . . : :.. NI I :, ,,, • 1 Li I I:, 1,4 , .(11110*. •11,!Alii44 0-44:01:404014•Air;;,& i'',I• i '.:• ... '.!, • ' % ' " ;11410P-' ' -".-.1::',:•• rt$ .;) ,,i ,1 .., . i ‘,' t I, I :. 1 •,,i-..'',5),';','t, ,:„..% . , .: 1,..••'.- . !-,, ,,-, , 4 ,::,..., 4 . ,.. ..., , ,.1 44 ibi„.-:"-'/..-*•;:a/ !.;irfs!,k4r 411'1,,A•it:,4..j ,t('-‘' 'edg f':*'....1*•',.;''''' `'''": ' ' ' '..--: '' . . Is 1 1 :7N '•. i F t 1 • PINV*II.1.131./.• tAlit•":04..11,,;(1!)t 4,14...*:$ti,:_.•iit.1.. r'-•-.-- '1,,.."--,• • : "-- : . ... ••• 1 „ % 1 .., -, k.:, 4 g r"..--i---4.• it . ••,... tt,1 .1%.' .%,.„',,,', ', f, 1 . . . ,5 .., t .•/ I;i: e• I '''• ; i 1 ,Fi. 1 Tili.t.:11747.4 91•1 • 1',.. 0•11 • Aft*- 't'I .-4.11, ,,'--.: -.- :... ,,. .4 • v. ., . ., %. :!,`,..1• ' ''-- ••'-'10f114,1; .;.1141,61:4•tt l'ile,,if;7P`.-• :.•,.. ' ... .• ' , t , ;;4,1,•-••43 l'it.:1•• 2111/.1/Gt. •ityri 11.8i•ivi.t.A.•/21-,.. • '.,10 -..-- - :,"•.•,* 01%.ttogt- • 11..6p • a 41,tzepilf's.....,1',7-).• a i it;',', Voir' 41.tiirel';`71;:!1/7 !II r q.tzttil rP,,...'''''" i T, - . •-• . 4,1;• 4: a, •••‘• .•: I-,•63/6-1•1;11:1;t!pr!:.•11.*eit:,--',,tri '''' '" Id; Att• •-u 4144011 ;I: 01,41f 1pi, .:,•••:•1 ...I i-;,.m.' c. i'7%,•4,M• -ilfawl+13Atif. !"? *: it It ..p.. 0'4" • •",:-'1.:., • " . ?...- : tlitv.-to.• ;01 iPill;fet vir y..,•„N.i.,,,,,, - CI • ..0.• la ;44, ',,f4-$0:;• 11.t840 f .1.1 ti I. 1•••*..•..;t:.....3.p,-.. ;:- 4% • _ -,:e•• i1,74,11,%10110,4.4ti,1!:•littillt li Effililiv.t/st!i4ts,'''; •.; •-:••\ .,‘ , • • '4, : .. •,2 ..- irrit•t„IL-21 11.-•,4 a I - p 4.1.ter• .r.: '4,.' „ ..,, ...% ., Is. P/el ?151;9711+1 ‘_•raiii! til Ai• to. * liV,: ,-;„..% 7 i -116 % a. 04 t i 7 • as. . t.s a%•11,4 ... I o• , '‘ :1 .. o : ..; . .,:..,ii.. •) , '',',, • 1 c. a*•1•f. I 1.„ . , r. I % • ••. 4 , I •• ' .4 1 : 1.i. • A I 1 1 r r i i ..T.,, r.:... ..; ‘,. ,., 1 14,, 1.e i• si_ ...•_ .1 .••...f.,•-,4..4 .t ..,-,.. . • aoh . .... 4.1 4. •S, i 1 I. •.,;4•tf 4 i.:c gretkit;:je. r Ii • •.*.gr4.•4 po--. • :, • . 1:!.1 ' ';..4. A 'i: :tilt(t*ItS-1‘/Iii!Plitilli.lii(Ifir%tkrSII.''''-;2''''' %.-A• 14•.*-,.1. --- :-. - - ,;,.- • ILO ad •- 41.,;,. 94 •plo • 1,44 41 i fit.,:./,. ',.. , •LIF / I •,!1.1 I t • S. i* t I • • t/ „Is .. t. I:44 •If I ./ • I 1/4: I i 1 ..•; f, 0 vi...-•P* f itill,P.-4,4•411124314c: .•11••••••;•.1thl-4--:- --, - A'A . . Z I' eI l'Illi.tit"4 ''dt i It 'it.iP:i `o,i. ': `, ' ..X. I •,..( 147 ,t,,, •l i .4, '''' i:i*; St 41!144tIlt IIIii;Wt e•!••i''‘t,•ti,', . ;'''' ' 7--•., d ' ••• . , ..„: e ...‘ ' '‘-ctrio4 iveq./I:it f,jr•C°• !fitl",:.,,i.r•:. . ,-.:':;. '4 ':, t ••• 1 N• k ..,. - -1- •- I ':iii.1,:te.isto;,., 74:.• ,', , -, \ / :•••1 l' ..1 ta .1.. l' k„ .1 ii;.% :. r. , • . a ....• - It ! .'1. ; * 16'1 't. . , , r .....,, i.jiaot;s,' • '' prZ4.ii.e.1:.)s,,,size.1..':,-,:.7,:,:i.,,,%, 1,,. ... ,.. '•...-• 1.:8.44...04....: 'VI 7. -. ./', is."', f I 'f. • I ..•' ' Ilkii,;:dr-rt. i;1''.i.,7 :"...,.4-:,:1".1,,,7,',..44-, le,-- '-'7 ,.!;k7;7‘iirgii., •1'..,r-r1771 '•-•7(f ''''''''.....: "\ " . C ‘ 1 0' ' 0 ‘'N 0 ‘ ‘ • I 1 I NI ligliVIr'''' ''"I'V 1104.'444;4hr, ` ' '''''"-ka;*,,4,', ,,.'.1,..1', '`i!'....‘,1 .,::".,,' . ,' . , •: •1 • ...4 • li i 4114.41,..AA'` f444r. V1jOil ''',. •.."' 1.' .,IttAlCii;:kil --,!14Arniti,kt ,:.( .7.:, e' N ' '' " 1:• i'. i t ..• )1I' re 1:yieir,, .. .C.,4, IN,t,-, 4,4 yo,Lt . 4„,1..!tTp-,-,--(....• -...-, •, • \ ii 44 ',„„ i i i Ei: -•;/. ,.44, i. ,:f.,-::•,e;•....••t,1 "145,••,:-,, 4:.;(1;ktt.--;,..-!:.;Y-.t:,,.4.•••:•,1"..-,:,,,,,,i.,''', - • ' 1, 16: Iv- 4;64;716;'•I'V''' ifA.- -"; I)',:•--•!;i?,,`,:;L:',•9 ..•:„'.1 6,-..... .....--. • :1 `•4 1 . lb :.. ..• .5 • ' I.•54firlirie:* ':'' .. .' b .1 !',.."`'‘••',,r'' ' • ' , ! ra ; .-te. l'''.-- .4, --.4-,, 4!r • --, ,'S';'';-,, . :. .';-;r• 4.' \ : ,, ,i,,,. ,t-,. : ..t:Ul.„ ,,, ,1-.,..0,. ..:;-:--‘)'•:•••:.,,: k••.: : '.,''';'*2 :" • ‘ 11 ; • i . '4•5!'-'104•11g.41e „ • .at-ItA, ,,}k, ; .., , : ;. i , .4 ,,,,. i .-ra. ....... 4, . $e , II • I' 1 !'"...- 1•L',.6,i'i ."VI .?/1.t•loi.s,11. ••‘.,\.$at.. .,....,..r`v1V,PI'; ' .!' i 4 ; t \ v, 1.\0. • • lop •,#, ..'t k ' •:.p.411.e. ..4.41 ,.1 IF ' '-',1",•t:',':-r• 1"'''' 40-' . ti I k :1 2 •".1.- ti----.. •-,,....f.:/;* ,-•••. ...1,,,1„. .,,-L•L•F4,,--,, - ..,...,.i,;.1:;,•,.. ,.. • •4 II 4 4../. A'/ • \ ',. : •a.;'- '10 1-,. poi-A,' .4'.-q-4, ..z,',- - '•1..s. i ' c; .t t% 11,, ......... - -.... ..,1 ?, .... • . • - ... .s 4 % ..t,r•••• ....#•••.1 N .• l'• I I ; J -., . r,t,i,1: .,.pi pp i ilefirtiAtp ik A .,,!,• • l• 444. 1..; • "t'• ' al 1, 4141SX I fit. .. ' ' ' •. 0 " t I : .;'4 ''.';''''..j.. 1,:;:.'li?i...f.,'-.1.rt-/"'-:;"*:;:f..•z•s-j7-r,*- -,•:, - ' 4 „ ‘4 4. - ,...r....,...r• 00 o r ,... . .k sit li r.,1*, •-i'. (:-. 1-,:•-: :Rt,V.,t,'-',6e-•;'''Wt-z -,.14-2-2 .,,.,141011, • . . , ., . , 4 i .p.r • -re.? • - •... •'', 1 i i;r1:1- ' rs.3* ' ZlisillfirleJstfiA4Vf,,'..,:i . .,. , %.1.1. ,I°'*. 6.00%.'1.* ,'a0 41$1 I •)' r•.' i;: i • :YIP 11444 0 . 1••1•• •• ';'. 2j44.4.`''er.','-; .,•;. ,. ,,,CAT''.«.-!:, -,.';', ' '''.. .' . ' '''. 1 ) .. ,„ • •, "*.,,rn: r.• •• *:!...,..A.,',..`47,...,,.,..., . .t , •:. Vtllir,11-4:-..zps•-,;41;,.,.,.4.v iz i.,: ,._. ' '1 .4",""' • . -,i ..r..-.,:...1 4,1.i‘tfr..'Af'.!?:li`'47;:"..4,.•" ' ' '' , 1 i , a. 4.'..t'.)4 I J f ,‘, ,. ., . ,_,..,,,,:'•:‘,....,:-.. .i.,,,'....;;•:?.,:.:;:•4.,'*;:s.4;',.1,:,..:f41.4",,,,ii•tk,..1.:. ' je...111te,i-.1.•;17.71 •.: • 1 , i '., j !• Y' ',oaks` .ls .< } C • lb , J ••y 1•I.� .w'MI • •,• 1•• y r r� n� ,fY 'c fit' it? h,. ' i 1 tr . 1; {' ., •6 � • , y4 'Yl t ja‘flf.', . .Q + �, t,.!�� Y ''Y . ': • Lii) Q •O. •�y• !t!`/ > \`, ~ ` 1 U `� ._' '3�"i� -(tf.Jt>auk4:e.• µ '�n.`•t,111 5.. l ` i I' ( _ • _, • - NI._ •Ja..sz 1..J:.i "• :.gad i... ••• yl ir � ? 11 t•I. �•• 1, .... Iv'sr'�V� • •• ��• ' :w w3` `� '"«�.' 4 '� '?.f F �u' ftjtgILI' C'°1ike i.. •i ;.� ti / I• 1r t 1 r+#wTR1mC •.I . ri; •> — '� i al.: '� t • +�• •t: 1 .. :�.v"•.Ft T�`OCeF•r"><•r r ' `ti i Q.;r u/. ...7...•.� h� A t...- A4' •, \,,t 1 ` r; . 1'1 ,yTRp • `' ti�, H . .„ , ,, 'f` t'Sr�. N�; ?•t ! •r1(i�!'*,''+` ?•!��rJ :r ti`..�y`.�. }f 1 • i•s ial•yt9'•r �• ,t ` LA ��Fcaay �Tnv`�• �.��s,+ �,,~ . \ •• - 1 t3<'. < t tiy(•�'ryti� �.,,\,a,..SzTpty"�1, w��(.1a7.• ` f sC • 14 i .• 1•- •s ♦' . l+ �,:trl. ;`lI � � L \K•"!••lll [ r �. '1 • ( • M •• f :FS'ti j• ^I�. ; y� • F t� j p t a; i •r f' ,) �' t; i t rw ft,, rT • 7, .,3 v « iV�+,t„.,7' •{a 4-ice 74 ,6 '- J• 1 ,... /• t=74v I'� pi t,43'4r • . { li F, ,...,. a,T .. • I , (^ ,, . ti ;i, A 1 ,,t it,e .i.�tt f.T;'r43/P ,! 5+�. Ii:•'C' ':.I' -'1 r F 4, • t, { . • •)♦ Ca a..r 1 • / r ,y I ^. •, y� !„+itl .ti'' u Wx' .. 5 i y ! t. !,,, . ti •ate . i tc �' 1.1Y r_• a4 1, !qt .t(✓erl. ,. , a•,buS1 Y; a. ti *�Ai' jyjryJ 'Ja 1 ^?T i 0� y��--y`• +�•}!• PkN s'`1.l .�'e� D' 'r • • • :• ,I♦ S 'e • •T a- \�v. av�l, * `t�altis t t .r. rX`••t••: anti .t `� at? sy " a � , ' 'G�.t'i "' 4P:�t+Ha..ire r r T• T • No v $ri m, d'v " .:1 ,�• 1. i s y x y rvN.I-4 +4Y Cj� H 1 1L t+s ^ +yti•p i y�y�t L i'ati?4, •AI; • 0 �, t `:i+y�.,T SCtwr ^ * ! jt,`+,U��ye. i/tih -•} +l.• �'. W. Q•i'�♦ '� �I x 9it 0� rt da .� ...gip, 1 K. �� 0��.. • _ 'O':., ` N" f1r�' 'jt 7"J.- v �F� � q:Y'ff, I i•L�;yp��i .;`?yip • '-, .... .,t2.#11-il.cl'A'4*.4N' ,..310.4 :•'`.--,`.:;.,..$,-!:r :' ..ti,..t.,1\,),;'dr,'.. - c. 1, Avg,` •.�1.. t 5 , L 'S�7i ,*ps,7 f v k Ii/'•f S++a1y. >:•1r1 te r+a..:f ,N • k • , I yi sib ` {�JS- ,Tl.�.t ,..a,. 1'.. R• 'Wks. t• i•'�: � •' J r ;f\••'iQ. ;� Ili i" tl ,:AV Oil!. 11.' is ���a �: .�44,• �"� •` �` ;•` it J' !S ��\� • •, Q Sy" r r f-TNt �c :. r 11L6iC_ sly. « '.•..�". ,.,$*, ' ,�j4;�{ 4.4 ,, . Sip t Zyy j•' i4, t '.•.:‘:'•1..'.,‘Th'.....'..,",.•' . V p .� 1 1 ) R<.a Via , rr• y r t;.. : if 7•'t t' `l v,• ,i y h • • - 2 y . f''r1 r.3 ( 'r f£L '.f"S• .rjii't -T .`ITS • - - J.hi t1 i ~f 14a} )y4Yr.ri Sl i+., f,!• • • • Z{• i` ... ++.•"•:4 e r 1 t r •" 'Yi` ,, • . . ,9;. i` '• -} .1� .!. 4 ''�i,'C K••�< y. •Y 4..ii6 .fl ;.. ..•. i#.. % ;{ i, • y % .,.._..._..�...e ... ..,.. a .►!.•Lis wrs - r .f ".. .•ter l wC 'L rs 1.w a....iti•..�.if�iZii1yy : : .• •Rty b.�>'s '.r' ( ,• -,}.f'„......„,..1„..... ...r-4;4 .,.14•'4�•'doy,,i.:+ .. _ ., ;... .S..t-lM_ ::x.:iw+r'di•. v...,..„• ��.reip .1 • ,L,=/vf 4- i - .�. • �.lg'Y1"1� r7 y. •Y 7� , - r4 +.�L b 2. '� .> +A F' s•}...4 • • ^•'4 jam} `f !�a ::x:�. ':f� ,.. i '. ( a4.� i• s7 ��,i 'Iti ` . 8 !.k ^ t. ►,. ..w_.n......Gw1' r i '! 2, _• `w1l. 1'4.r _ce' .t sr r174 ,+Re•ic • �; ( Y d••..•�.�•;`".' 'a`+ •.^a .ri%.L: r.• r• _ ` •.S• •( 5. Y 4, ‘� 41 tR a '.,���ry '*:$ ,. M i Y, k. +•t; .o.4,,r� t (! 4 ids .w .3. _�,1,4.". i ',�4 t t.... .� Ss •`„41:. M1r.. ' 11 d.. _'•• i•I .' F a.';r•jj� Fdt �y}�j �a�<r,.^�o f.�. t.�•1•,! i_ p y4'"�' .,.�j�'1�y' ..:4. I •yT;i. 1 (Y is1 t .✓' .:Z � � J3} ��'� `h•i • , t.a... ,1.:YG�"• 1 •1.4-'I'i?",••• *, } 1+= ;'!;•:" t• ..1 +•s, r.111 y15•*• *'�i`� r. Ii4 �. • T'" `'Z-:� .. J:t •; ,.,.t.t.:4.71 r.; ..� •(�d•L S 4 y..7 ♦ k • • • •• • • �• • ��yl/. _ ,.�.1 .'S�.c;a tN� afN1, i , •tr. s.4_ • '4 N!► • • t t10#Mom `•a0;ri ,r 3#` ., i� a� Ttt.i.i_„•C-•• r` '{,,,, �.'( is.. 'Ma-- 4pAaet1aktr .M aso•.• se-v. l; M. 0110 40' i r r..$ brestria.", :mg s • Mi"fie.• zL G - • r'• _ 0' st�� .. ,,�i 1Ct ,1 * -:t ,,z y' rvaj' lac---4^t:', •S • • �` _ ...*10400 1 y! T om. •4 -F1 i...4 .aL�'�.+l. 1,41ii.tr. •' ��(� 1' ,'yam yam. . ,. . 4.Y.:1':'''y -4"--'-':;,.C�.:47 b .s - t �m. .- .S 413 -... Imo-". le M t V 4 '� �,� "A. a+ k; 7C 1 Y:' i xZ,�3 •r •+ tt ,s"Y #�i Mr►r1�::- M.. tgt"N js'�. .f. '0s `'ire -u.i1'f4. '/l E'.' 4�. ?' '; r 1k 4k•= k emr0,�it-�a:i t�'.tr. ps i..:ay,� getr el«: al..- ;a• � �r � �.ZI.� a r.- e• ��• i......•!•�"imi ta•,Wm• tte.=.tlM+•t!•'•t1a M••!•:"r A. i- 4 ''"_' ttt'" . ="c' ti �1'`. !a►r O�r to R•t•* •S!*to +I s4 r.'#� •. . t ....swoopji. 3 a !INf'•a•• ••!�w1�!00111!•ii• ••••1.t t•45N•d I.`T ..'',.: s, .." „ _ . .saw", > ��. '`Yt fe k M 4••••Aa1 arm t a l�7 A es M�,•r** f` 'ti. ,�z `' �.•it,1 • . ti. `.' r P r'!A t••.f.�A A ✓}� �� — .A�0 Ii�i fg'.3r•'� ''� ++� b r. e• + �..: i k •-r- OM. N /!tt!M.a w•�waft�t►at.>,.Ma4w_,x"AKi ��l rt'r "7`-` ..- "r `t:.:s- 'z c 5,1, r t; 11 •••• r+ i: :I III NOV el.tea rw 1�'1/�/ —- $M$ 1�I t /R,a's`.. , ,i „...4 -+3'13' "r ,s,..4.,„4'-;�' . � :r Ms ai•R: 'off/loose.*sip, Awe taA�fa •gran..., • '{ si'i'l �- ''. Lrex rs •' ;£> r ••a f-*'d"•-' wttal.••.'�•N/M+•'4*.II M..*•$ $1+ : .1 .iCti "� '= e� i t ::rw. 44•'..'1..aIA .A4:IAN A OP.."saw •p`�•:1 s'- y d-i� -.. xFlt' r,'•`a x `r kr�. ri } 15A�a'� •H ka1..' :�• �S Nit1 r.M a•a► •1e64 _ i.! a r..Y4 -4` t., �t'c '4 . .,, 11. .a 441,1 •>•N.1('Ma'j'.?,a►.•!•_:S••."•wat-t'J�•M_,,—..► •I 1:t.. 'ire` a }T` 4-7 i c •*•••,ta'7•t1�-.1N•• WO'ir^�• ei•1�rd••P•*- 7a•• 0.-411••h• • as �,Y.n- 'f >,. f 4 • ti * 't:•L�1•�'!•./.ar'• II•'K0 -•! 1 ••►tl,. -+E.3•i: ----go-r -a- rr.i T*"+� .a�F w••, .1. . , - 3O'��-r •e'Ve -W t fo;!.04'::i••'►tf `M•:to • 0.11.1 r• ale'- • •r "�'�` s t "SMN= iSi1 +-tt'w••"R!`3A"r •t i••'•!taaN • I •i•a•• ,••`1 A � ��-af�� .t•�,� 3. ..... :..-.....,• -• .: z a-„Idi i !`-•-•-•r01'�t• •eliti*1 AO%es•t�:•11.. =.•s..+••�'•o. I 4-4!••N!. •-••'.•wr to •1.M•' :• q,/ ' ••c1 1":It M • R 'r •w . +��1t+••f�,,/ ir. ...ri'y-'� • "••'t•;�1•-�►!•1 •aa•-tr•4'•,* 1 eel*••s"Le•f . _x_ -r` m• i�..•� •NI: C • It ! M'•V• '•• • 1 aN I !•'1:1V‘ . 4. �.1 t•t� liri "w. i••.x.• i•• as r tot. YIN UN. • $ir:•,f.1 •n d•t►• ,!.' s A� a i I1 .#1 ' i ..r " 4., ne1113 y or s 1 r>Y.' -" - t i• r e ` (' 'r __ ..cam•' !,' ".v '�..:•-- r ..--r�^'K••J?1: ..'tsyW,_ • J _ "' f tF I .'i •. - t y .l �'�':fit • �1I. titj �/ 77 t:fYJ E:J, L1r1f et(l1/ 1'Cs.)•3,i5-t ll:l le A.O..rl 'f'.I r-r, - .._... {.•t...' `'.rJt=: a cES1nI 1VE COVENANTS. ;DECLARATION OF , . v ' _ :2 L 4 WIiLRLAS, Lako Terrace Park Associates is the owner of the following real ; �� *' property in the City of Renton. Comte of King. State of Washington, described as Exhibit i ?' r ' "A"attached hereto. > .x� !ii' . WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following s r9 ' a .:. �j .• restrictive covenants bo running with the land as to use, present and future, of the ave t , ,,. C2 described real property. _ ° '� v NOW ,THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish. grant and impose 2 _,, restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the tt �x} use by therundersigned their successors.heirs and assigns, as follows::. A ':Prior. to'publication of the rezone ordinance for.application R-090-81. the 7 .. . -4 ' applicant-shall provide a total of $6,450 as a voluntary payment to the City of ,4, �� -r..;, 11 Renton, which fund shall:constitute the total contribution, and shall be used s . •ri exclusively:for.the traffic`improvements and associated work identified in #1, '"` ,) 2. and 3 below. x 1. , Widen'800 lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 � feet between Park Drive and Houser Way to widen 800 lineal feet of Lake ;;. rr ,a x a r ; Washington Boulevard at-its approach to the intersection of North Park -'� 1iflo + # � `� Drive �Y,�t , , ▪ 2 Update the traffic signal control at the intersection of Lake Washington - < ;5 . ' Y' ' Boulevard and North Park Drive ,t � ?k., 3 ! "'�,i'- x, • 3 Improve the:intersection of Burnett Avenue,North and Lake Washington , , t <.. ., z � -''' k • C* Boulevard to accommodate left turns across traffic southbound toward the :proposed development i, *'" .r ,.• ,d r ' '� i B• nThe_following off-site public's.treet improvements shall be a condition of any <_, :r> , development'permit issued by the City and are to be accomplished coincident ' ; .. s� t; wdth:the development of the site should such'development be pursued by the N. `_ ` 'app licant and approved by the City. The applicant may request, and the Board ..'i�� 7_ 1 "` '''of Public Works may consider. a deferral of any of the work in accordance with ,: • the then applicable City codes. • C. Provided total cost for installing the left turn lane opposite the entrance to the =b 71-Lakeside site. ,' �s' ?', a r D -:Provide off-site improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard, curbs. gutters. sidewalks, and street lighting, together with all necessary appurtenances across the frontage of the Lakeside site. E Provide asphait surface gravel-based temporary sidewalks, 6 feet in widths t f 'from the subject property to the entrance of Gene"Coulon Beach Park. to be y . t� 1 located'cad installed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by t ' .the.:Department''of Public Works. said plans and improvements to include 7.q. necessary associated drainage appurtenances." Further. traffic control for pedestrian crossing over Lake Washington Boulevard from its east side to its 4,,40- west side in the location of the north entrance to Gene Coulon Park would be .f ; s provided. such traffic control to consist of striping and associated signing to the `j ':` s extent that such sidewalk improvements have been otherwise provided, this f. L applicant is not required to duplicate those improvements. L. • . . . • ,-- '7.:.-•••-, -,..:4-.-,--1' • . • : : - :::.:2:: '''' •• -• -;:::i-Zik ,-z-jg,g7,: - - $ • _ . - ' .e. -..kr>.."-v.t . ,,, :-...::- • , -• • ..,‘,. k 4...t,r,e..I., of ' ' ':1"-' - .... . I.•:, . No (itsv.. ,,/..7.:. •ilt of t hi s i)rci ject i s to °CCU 0(3!' S t.. .: ... • •••is .., . . _ • ••••" • - t!11 105-f L.lot contour eli.,vzit lot,. - -- a - ' , ',•-• ; , : ' fi----;; z .:. . G. Lake 'I‘•rr act., As s•-lciiit es shall amend . their yet:lass i--. • - . •,......";_44,-..,'44',. f teat ion app 1 i cat ion to I imi t the maximum number ' of • - ..',„_,,-...u. -,..,-?,- dwell ing ui i t s rogues t C.,.1 to 187; prov ided, however that in I lie event I liat t lie zoning limit at ion of t he . . ••, !,,;!:,,ti. ..,,,A.:45, . , subject area described in Exhibit. "A" should change by , ordinance so,.al; to permit more units.' than 187, ttlen such zoning 'chatigc. shall supercede...and supplant . - ,,..,: ..,,.- :•., .. „, . , • that, . portion, of . the' restrictive, covenants cont iary -- • . .-k, , 2,',7,.,.._ thereto. - ' ' ' '.. -: ,.-."-.--; ' ' ' • - ;4t; , --7• -'7= '. tit,,..r3 '-:•.!";•,•:..--.•...i. . • -. „-,... •.:::-.,-_-:=,••,. '- ,. • • :0:: ,,....•1 On July 14. 19E3,- Lake Terrace Park Associates i-epr6= •' ' ,.-,k, !-.1-',;,3-Tr; C -, , ,. . • sented by Gerard M. She 1 lzi,, formally amended their rezone application . pursuant to .the -.stipulations ex-'• - • . -i4-, •:;...- , .. ecuted- by:. both parties .on June 15,, 1983,- and suhse- . , '.,:, ; ,,,,.. : ...,„•,.... ..,,,, , CO quent ly included in the decision of the 'Hearing Ex- '„,•... ;.., '.......'-:-1,; aminer dated. June 23, 1983.-- - , < , ',:•,;.,! ,,:j•-_, ... y - __ ki. :44- •t ,... - - - -- • -, "-;...3.;',),--'-',--7. -•• • 1.:..t. ; . •t•°-.s.a-• . ' , .-. -4.,!.. ---- tvt:.'..‘-2 .'--• ''''' : THESE COVENANTS " shall run with the4. land and expire on ,,,‘"-----..-, ', - - ‘', -.4-2.-- 1;*; :i i•.' - ' December 31 2025. .' '.... ' - • . --'.--:-.''',% ,•-:'.. _ • ...‘, = . -,,z.,-• .., ,,,,-, ::: . 1, ...., , • ..--';".- -'...` - ,..• ` '' -- ,'" • -. ,, P'1.- ,..-:,•-4.,‘ , - - -. "....- •'. : ' ii-0 :,..,.J..-g.. f, ...,-: -...-. . Any violation •or, breach of these restrict ive covendiftile.:-'^ , , .....,,.. 1:, V '''" -" . , . . •.-,:- ./.!,;.., --i. /..‘• - ' -t may be enforced by proper lejal procedures in the Superior le. --; .•.,:..'" .•• ,,. . . '., • • . :),i ,:.-1...„?....„:1, ... . Court of King County by either the City of".Renton or any prop- ..• 1.11i. ":•;•,.. ,erty , owners adjoining subject property who are ad\ersely •• ',''• - " - • ,-,. .-_. -. -1,KkyieveAlb, ' - • j-t;','"1.1..-7i 2 , fected, by said breach. .•,: , • ' ,..,,,t;..:•••r7c..- . ......--,,-*-,' ",;''Al t, - • ...i. .r),.'r,•••••A'.4:',V-1-.‘..-.,..- - ,,.. , • _ _ -I...., „ . . . , '., ' - - - , . - ,:i ",,1-(41:1.,lit,•%'..,k.4.1.1''' Maiiagin. ,',• g Partners: : , . . , ,,. ""_, ' •,„ ,, _ .',.',-•;,r",,,44.--':,.:ec,,?.;',.. , ,,,2. ., - -:.-v,,,-- ,-,,,-1,:,;!, •• •=3. -..,,,,.-.....,. -.'''x''."' - '1--Y.e' - :•-;*4"!:''''--. ''" - - ,y;,F ,.....z':4--'-•-4irt,:...,.: -.,':„.?,,-•,-• - . :....-_,,r,1 , . ", , 7,11,V., •*.;.f.1:-,.•'' '- ' ,.-,-: ' .F7• ' • - '-'• 14';'-4:?:4.`4. ', ----5:": _ . ..,-44- "N. ,. , r.c:..*'. ALEX CUGI NI,-• : ' ' J. 1'...EV:-HARE12' ' - . .--''':'3 .,- ..,N4:1-2:1•,•••=,.. '- "...:-.1.1t. 14. :;:: ... .. / , , 4.4 .. t t STATE OF WikSIIIN(GTON )- ' • - --- ; . ' - 3,_ „.:,7,,,f,-,..z., .: ---'•._, • `.at- --.=:`,4'-.1...'•.'.', , :.t s COUNTY OF KING ) • ,_ ,, , k-iv: •-•,-•''f.4)...,:. _,2 ,4 1 , On this z. c7 - day of November, 1983, before me, the under-,, ..;,,-,1.. , ......,.5.. . signed,. a Notary Public in and for -the State of Washi .igtori, duly c.omr.lissioned and sworn, personally appeared ALEX CUGINI, . z • • • • . JR and ,J. STEVE HARER, to me known .to be the individuals 'de- scribed in And who _executed the within and foregoing instrument , • and acknowledged tome that they signed the same as their free - ,•1...v - .- -.14- • • and, voluntary act • and deed for the uses and purposes therein . . mentioned. - ... ."1 . WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day ,. . • , - _ , •• , ' „;', and;year .first above written. , ... , ,.._• ,..' , ‘ ,,,:. ',.., 4, • ... . - i .,- _ T3 , - e--..3- NOTA1W lugtui.q ;in and for the ... 1 - . .• •• . N,, -- - •--• • • , .. ... , State of Washington, residing at 81 30 ' So_.„, /.31-1 - q+71 Se7' e• • - 1 ' " - • • • '' t ".•; ‘, , . .7?....5.,., , • . • Ca ' . -. . - .... • ii- • , C t 1.:%:-., — 2 - • 1.AKE i i.RRACE PARK ASSULIA 11 S 1 LEGAL DE SCR IP 11UN 1'!`,Ilr1.t A: 1 hat port ion of (;overnmeot I ut ) in Sect ion 5, township 25 North, Range 5, 1.a;'. W.M., in King County. Washington, lying F asterly of 1 ake Washington Boulevard; except that portion platted as 1idun Acres. according to the plat recorded in Volume II of plats. page 86, in King County, Washington; together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would attach by operation of law. :n PARCEL II: Lots 39, 40, and 41, Eldon Acres, according to the plot recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, in King County, Washinc,ion; except that portion of 1 of 41 conveyed to King County for road purposes by deed recorded under Auditor's F ile No. 1020457; together with that portion of vacated Southeast 100th Street (formerly known as Mildred Avenue) adjoining, that would attach by operation of law; together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North. under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. PARCEL C: That portion of Lot 28. Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 86, in King County, Washington, lying westerly of a straight line extending from a point on the south line of said lot, distant 122 feet westerly of the southeast corner to a point on the north line of said lot,being 236 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot; together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North. under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. PARCEL D: Lot 2/, Eldon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 86. in King County. Washington; together with that portion of vacated Pelly Place North. under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3447 that would attach to said property by operation of law. PARCEL E: - 1 hat portion of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range S East. W.M., in King County. Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 26, 1•.idon Acres, according to the plat recorded in Volume :1 of Plats, page Sr, , in King County. Was+uhgton; thence West 172 feet to the true point of beginning; thence West to the point of intersection of the South line of Tract 27, Eldon Acres, with the West line of the East half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5; thence South to the North line of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division No. 5. according to the plat recorded in Volume II of Plats. page 33. in King County. Washington; thence East to a point South of the true point of beginning; thence North to the true point of beginning; except that portion thereof lying Easterly of the W"sterly margin of the abandoned right-of-way (200 feet in width) of Pacific, Coast Railroad Company. ''r ` • •• `c• t�t **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/07/98 14 :40 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9804822 Amount : 2 , 000 . 00 08/07/98 14 : 39 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1919 TCR NORTHW Init : LN Project # : LUA98-123 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 229650-0200 Site Address : 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BL N Total Fees : 3 , 000 . 00 This Payment 2 , 000 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 3 , 000 . 00 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/07/98 14 :40 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9804823 Amount: 1, 000 . 00 08/07/98 14 : 40 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1973 TCR NORTHW Init : LN Project # : LUA98-123 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 229650- 0200 Site Address : 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BL N Total Fees : 3 , 000 . 00 This Payment 1, 000 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 3 , 000 . 00 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/07/98 14 : 41 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9804824 Amount : 26 . 56 08/07/98 14 : 41 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1972 TCR NORTHW Init : LN Project # : LUA98- 123 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 229650-0200 Site Address : 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BL N Total Fees : 3 , 026 . 56 This Payment 26 . 56 Total ALL Pmts : 3 , 026 . 56 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 26 . 56 cS- I2-3 (c;) GEOTECH June 18, 1998 CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 NE 20th Street,Suite 16 JN 98192 Bellevue,WA 98005 (425)747-5618 FAX(425)747-8561 Trammel Crow Residential 4010 Lake Washington Boulevard Northeast, Suite 330 Kirkland, Washington 98033-7866 _ F • - u�� CITY OF . Attention: John Wayland AUG G r� �►-. ' Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study r-�r. rp„�© Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments 1f-.GCi�—n �' E 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Wayland: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the Tamaron Pointe Apartments to be constructed in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. You authorized our work by accepting our proposal, P-4535, dated April 17, 1998. Additional test borings were authorized by you on June 2, 1998. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with a total of 12 test borings that encountered dense to very dense, native sands. The native soils were overlain by a substantial thickness of fill in the western borings, and in one boring located in the southeastern portion of the site. Conventional footings can be used for the buildings where competent soils are near the planned excavation elevations. Deep foundations, such as augercast piers or driven pipe piles, will likely be needed where deep fill is present. Closely-spaced, heavily-reinforced piers are needed along the downslope sides of Buildings 11, 13, and 15 in the event of future soil movement on the steep slopes. Disturbance or filling on the steep slopes should be avoided. The moisture- sensitive soils will make wet weather earthwork more difficult and costly. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate _44 MRM: alt GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed apartment complex in Renton. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. We were provided with a grading plan dated April 15, 1998 and developed by Pacific Engineering Design. A copy of the Land Title Survey prepared by Hallin and Associates, and dated June 5, 1998 was also provided. The plans illustrated property boundaries, existing topography, and the locations and finish floor elevations for the planned buildings. Based on this information, we anticipate that the existing mobile homes will be removed, and 15 apartment buildings will be constructed on the site. The two existing accesses off Lake Washington Boulevard will be maintained. Several of the buildings are shown to be situated close to the crest of steep slopes that are located along the north and west sides of the property. Buildings 2, 4, and 6 are indicated to be 20 to 30 feet from the toe of steep cut slopes that exist on the eastern side of the site. Farther north, carports and paved areas abut the toes of these steep, eastern slopes. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is a large, irregularly-shaped parcel situated immediately east of Lake Washington Boulevard, near Coulon Park in Renton. Currently developed with the Lake Terrace mobile home park, the property is occupied by numerous mobile homes, and several wood-framed structures. Each of the homes has a small paved parking strip accessed from the asphalt drives that extend through the property. In many locations, the asphalt drives have broken up or have experienced noticeable settlement. The remainder of the site is covered with grass, landscaping, or gravel. Based on our observations, the site has undergone extensive grading, likely associated with its development for a mobile home park. The ground surface over the majority of the site slopes gently to moderately down toward the southwest. Along the western and northern sides of the site are steep slopes having inclinations of 50 to 70 percent. Generally, the western slopes, which extend down to the ditch along Lake Washington Boulevard, increase in height from south to north. The maximum height of the western slopes is 30 feet. The steep, northern slope has a height of up to approximately 20 feet. There are some short, steep slopes in the central portion of the site. Along the east side of the site are very steep cut slopes. These slopes have heights of up to 40 feet and are near-vertical in places. During our site visits, we observed a small landslide that had previously occurred on the steep, western slope, near the proposed Building 5. This slide had apparently occurred as a shallow slump that affected only the upper approximately 2 feet of soil on the slope. Single-family homes are located north of the site. To the south and southeast is the Marina Village apartment complex. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 2 Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling twelve test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction and required design criteria, the site topography and access, the subsurface conditions revealed during drilling, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. Borings 1 through 8 were drilled on May 14, 1998, while Borings 9 through 12 were drilled on June 9, 1998. These borings were conducted using a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 14. The native soils that underlie the site consist of silty sands containing varying amounts of gravel. Where the original topsoil was still in place, the underlying native sands were loose for a depth of several feet. Below this, the soils were dense to very dense, and relatively unweathered. These competent soils have been glacially-compressed. The gradation of the sands varied over the site, and in Boring 7, sandy silt was encountered. In Borings 1, 2, 5, and 8, the soils were very dense, native, silty sands within a few inches of the ground surface. These areas have apparently been stripped of the looser, weathered soils during past grading. A substantial thickness of fill was encountered in Borings 3, 4, 6, 7, and 9 through 12. This fill consisted of silty sand with varying amounts of gravel and organics, and appears to have been used to construct the steep slopes along the north and west sides of the property. The deepest fill was encountered in Borings 3 and 11 to depths of 18 feet and 23 feet, respectively. The fill was generally loose, indicating that it was not compacted at the time of its placement. The fill soils likely originated, at least in part, from cuts made on the eastern side of the property. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. If a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed at a variety of depths in approximately one half of the borings. • The encountered seepage appears to primarily represent groundwater that is perched above the dense native soils, in the looser fill and native soils. Some groundwater may also have originated from more permeable zones within the dense native soils. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. Typically, the amount of GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 3 localized seepage encountered in an excavation will be greatest following periods of extended heavy precipitation. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our observations and subsurface explorations, it appears that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The competent native soils encountered in the test borings are relatively incompressible, and are suitable to support foundation elements for the planned apartment buildings. No structures should be placed on the existing fill, as this soil is loose and will consolidate under even light foundation loads. Where the dense to very dense native soils are exposed by the planned building excavations, the structures can be supported on conventional foundations. Overexcavation, then backfilling the overexcavation with structural fill, could be used for buildings where competent native soils lie within approximately 5 feet of the planned bottom of excavation. For areas where deeper fill exists, it will likely be most economical to utilize deep foundations. This will probably affect all of Buildings 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15, and possibly portions of other buildings. Augercast concrete piers or driven, small-diameter pipe piles will likely be the most cost effective deep foundation options for the site. Heavily-reinforced, closely-spaced piers will be needed for the downslope sides of Buildings 11, 13, and 15 to retain soil under the buildings in the event of slope movement. We suggest that test pits be excavated around the proposed buildings once the existing mobile homes have been removed. This would allow a more detailed evaluation of the extent of deep foundations necessary for the construction. The steep western and northern fill slopes will likely experience soil movement in the foreseeable future. This slope movement could damage facilities constructed between the buildings and the steep slopes. For this reason, we recommend that no critical utilities or structures be located downslope of the western buildings. If possible, in-ground irrigation systems should be avoided in landscaped areas above the steep fill slopes. Broken and leaking sprinkler lines that go undetected can cause slope failures in these conditions. While comprised of very dense soils having high strengths, the cut slopes on the east side of the property will likely experience shallow sloughing over time. This is a natural process that results from weathering of the exposed soils. Only carports or pavements are located within approximately 50 feet of the cut slopes, where the slopes are tallest. However, Buildings 2, 4, and 6 will be situated approximately 25 feet from the slopes, with yard area likely occupying some of the area between the buildings and the steep slopes. We recommend that, as a minimum, a 4-foot- high catchment wall be constructed at the toe of the cut slopes to collect, or at least slow, soil that may slough off of these slopes. The Marina Village apartment complex has catchment walls constructed of railroad ties spanning between metal beams embedded into the ground. Similar catchment walls would be appropriate for the Tamaron Pointe project also. Disturbance of the steep, western slopes should be avoided, wherever possible, in order to prevent a decrease in the stability of these slopes. Fill should not be placed within approximately 15 feet of GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 4 • the crest of these slopes. Water from drains and impervious surfaces should not be directed toward, or discharged onto, the steep western slopes. The on-site soils are silty and fine-grained, which makes them moisture sensitive. Reuse of the native, silty sands as structural fill will only be possible during dry weather and if the excavated soils are prevented from becoming wet prior to placement and compaction. Where very moist to wet soils are encountered during earthwork, they will need to be dried prior to compaction. This is generally only possible during hot, dry weather. Adequate compaction of all fill, including utility backfill, for structural areas must be completed in accordance with our recommendations to limit the potential for settlement. Subgrades for footings and slabs should be protected with a 2- to 4-inch layer of gravel. This reduces subgrade disturbance due to foot traffic. Additional erosion and subgrade protection measures may be necessary, depending on the conditions encountered during construction. The native soils have poor drainage characteristics, so using them for wall backfill involves a risk that some water may seep through walls. As a minimum, waterproofing should be provided where there will be below-grade, occupied spaces or moisture-sensitive areas, such as storage and mechanical rooms. In general, the more care and expense taken during the initial drainage and waterproofing installation, the fewer water problems that will develop later. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. Conventional Foundations The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed, medium-dense to very dense, native soil or on structural fill placed above this competent native soil. See the later sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 12 and 16 inches, respectively. They should be bottomed at least 12 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for frost protection. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand. Overexcavation may be required below the footings to expose competent native soil. Unless lean concrete is used to fill an overexcavated hole, the overexcavation must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending 2 feet below the bottom of a 3-foot-wide footing must be at least 5 feet wide at the base of the excavation. If lean concrete is used, the overexcavation need only extend 6 inches beyond the edges of the footing. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 5 An allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings constructed according to the above recommendations. A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post-construction settlement of footings founded on competent native soil, or on structural fill up to 5 feet in thickness, will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one-quarter inch in a distance of 50 feet along a continuous footing. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following design values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter ,Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Where: (i) pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and (ii) passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above design values. Augercast Concrete Piers Augercast piers are installed using cvr ttiuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated subsurface conditions. An allowable compressive capacity of 40 tons can be attained by installing a 16-inch-diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into dense strata. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. We estimate that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live- loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structures should be less than about one-quarter inch. We recommend reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage extending a portion of the pier's length with a full-length center bar. Each pier can be assumed to have a point of fixity at 12 feet below the ground surface for the computation of lateral load resistance. The piers that will support the downslope sides of Buildings 11, 13, and 15 should be spaced no further than 3 feet edge-to-edge. These piers should be designed to cantilever to a GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 6 depth of 10 feet, resisting a lateral active soil density of 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting over the pier spacing within the cantilever portion. This is intended to retain the near-surface soil beneath these buildings in the event of future slope movement. Pipe Piles As an alternative to augercast piers, 3- or 4-inch-diameter pipe piles can be used to support portions of the buildings that are underlain by deep fill. Pipe piles cannot be used for the downslope sides of Buildings 11, 13, and 15, where large lateral soil loads need to be resisted by the deep foundations. Pipe piles driven with a 650- or 800-pound jackhammer to the following final penetration rates may be assigned the following compressive capacities. Pile Diameter Final Driving Rate Final Driving Rate Allowable Bearing Capacity (650-pound (800-pound hammer) : hammer) 3 inches 12 sec/inch 10 sec/inch 6 tons 4 inches 20 sec/inch 15 sec/inch 10 tons Pile caps and grade beams may be used to transmit loads to the piles. Pile caps should include a minimum of two piles to reduce the potential for eccentric loads being applied to the piles. Welded, slip or threaded couplers should be used to connect subsequent pipe sections on piles that need to be extended in length. Due to their small diameter, the lateral capacity of vertical pipe piles is relatively small. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For this condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using a passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot for this resistance. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above design values. If additional lateral resistance is required, we recommend driving battered piles in the same direction as the applied lateral load. The lateral capacity of a battered pile is equal to one-half of the lateral component of the allowable compressive load, up to a maximum allowable lateral capacity of one ton. The allowable vertical capacity of battered piles does not need to be reduced if the piles are battered steeper than 1:5 (Horizontal:Vertical). Seismic Considerations The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1994 UBC and the 1997 UBC, the native site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type S1 and Sc (Dense Soil), respectively. The loose, wet fill encountered in several of the borings is potentially liquefiable during a large earthquake. This hazard is mitigated by the use of deep foundations embedded into non- liquefiable soils to support the affected buildings. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 7 Slabs-on-Grade Where undisturbed native soils are exposed, the building floors may be constructed as slabs-on- grade. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. Building floors that are underlain by loose fill or native soils should be supported on piers, either as structural slabs or as framed floors over a crawl space. All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed later in Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls. In areas where the passage of moisture through the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand should be used in the fine-grading process to reduce damage to the vapor barrier, to provide uniform support under the slab, and to reduce shrinkage cracking by improving the concrete curing process. Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure * 40 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where:(i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(ii)active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. ' For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level, structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads, such as vehicles, will be placed behind the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 8 The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Where the on-site silty sands, which are not free-draining, are used as wall backfill, at least 12 inches of free- draining gravel should be placed against the walls for proper drainage. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the below-grade walls. If some seepage through the walls or moist conditions are not acceptable, waterproofing should be provided. This could include limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. Rockeries We anticipate that rockeries may be used in the site development. A rockery is not intended to function as an engineered structure to resist lateral earth pressures, as a retaining wall would do. The primary function of a rockery is to cover the exposed, excavated surface and thereby retard the erosion process. We recommend limiting rockeries to a height of 8 feet and placing them against only dense, competent native soil. Where rockeries are constructed in front of compacted fill, they should be limited to 5 feet in height. The lower two-thirds of each fill rockery should be constructed using 3- to 4-man rocks. Taller fill rockeries would require the use of geogrid reinforcement in the compacted backfill. The construction of rockeries is, to a large extent, an art not entirely controllable by engineering methods and standards. It is imperative that rockeries, if used, are constructed with care and in a GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 9 proper manner by an experienced contractor with proven ability in rockery construction. The rockeries should be constructed with hard, sound, durable rock in accordance with accepted local practice and standards. Soft rock, or rock with a significant number of fractures or inclusions, should not be used, in order to limit the amount of maintenance and repair needed over time. Provisions for maintenance, such as access to the rockery, should be considered in the design. In general, we recommend that rockeries have a minimum dimension of one-third the height of the slope cut above them. Given the existing soil conditions, tiered rockeries are not recommended. Excavations and Slopes Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the existing fill and loose native soils at the subject site would be classified as Type B. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height in these loose soils should not be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. The above recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Excavation contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. All permanent cuts into native soil should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not be constructed with an inclination greater than 2:1 (H:V). To reduce the potential for shallow sloughing, fill must be compacted to the face of these slopes. This could be accomplished by overbuilding the compacted fill and then trimming it back to its final inclination. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. Also, all permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve the stability of the surficial layer of soil. Any disturbance to the existing steep slopes outside of the building limits may reduce the stability of the slope. Damage to the existing vegetation and ground should be minimized, and any disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Soil from the excavation should not be placed on the steep slopes, and this may require the off-site disposal of any surplus soil. Drainage Considerations We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of perimeter footings and all backfilled, earth- retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing, and it should be sloped for drainage. Drainage should also be provided inside the footprint of a structure, where (1) a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 10 surface, (2) an excavation encounters significant seepage, or (3) an excavation for a building will be close to the expected high groundwater elevations. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 15. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. Groundwater was observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to (a ) building(s) should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Water from roof, storm water, and foundation drains should not be discharged onto slopes; it should be tightlined to a suitable outfall located away from any slopes. Pavement Areas As exhibited by the damaged existing pavements, the subgrade soils are subject to softening under repetitive traffic loads. To reduce the potential for this, we recommend that at least 9 inches of imported, gravelly structural fill be placed under all pavement sections in drive lanes or entrys, where the heaviest, most frequent loading is anticipated. The subgrade soils must be in a stable, non-yielding condition at the time of paving, or the placement of structural fill. Structural fill or ferric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. We recommend using Supac 5NP, manufactured by Phillips Petroleum Company, or a non-woven fabric with equivalent strength and permeability characteristics. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, 12 inches of granular, structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lightly-loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily-loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily-loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. Some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 11 General Earthwork and Structural Fill All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. It is extremely important that the foundation(s) and slab(s) for the existing structures are also removed. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Location of Minimum Fill Placement Relative Compaction F Beneath footings, slabs 95% or walkways Behind retaining walls i 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio,expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78(Modified Proctor). Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil encountered in the test borings is representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test borings. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 12 • Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. The recommendations presented in this report are directed toward the protection of only the proposed structures from damage due to slope movement. Predicting the effects of development on the stability of slopes is an inexact and imperfect science that is currently based mostly on the past behavior of slopes with similar characteristics. Landslides and soil movement can occur on steep slopes before, during, or after the development of property. The owner must ultimately accept the possibility that some slope movement could occur, resulting in possible loss of ground or damage to the facilities around the proposed building. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Trammel Crow Residential, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotachnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this • report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 14 Test Boring Logs Plate 15 Footing Drain Detail GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June 18, 1998 Page 13 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 4 � ,4G of wAsy�lr' . ti •J 0 ti) 1� l •` tt::• o 27845 O. �w • • � �' GISTS. \' ESS/O�AL • c,�G SAS /48 [EXPIRES 10/25/97 I Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate )0-011/ James R. Finley, P.E. Principal MRM/JRF:alt GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. / $T :f�Q� ' � (�� rM C mi. r=s 'SE16�H / : 5 5- a a At S SE 4 N TM '^ _•..tic - e 'St IA. fA eL tl. . _CV URKF / Sl rr =< s3~ - ri `' BEACH1 TE . Sr � PARK (eff, N 43Ri1-r sE r3.N ST, mrH =sr '°e�e4 �,1, Si ---11 11200 116005EAel AL4y z II ci ,/ • 405 fr. d , AY SE 1. e N 40TH Si ? 6°r r a u 11G0 I cr. O4, sE a;T _� _ _ R E K E 85 Fri38TH ST r Pi •• l SE anTN$T N 371N Sf^ > ;,! SE Stan ST . ice.sE �`rf KENNYLNLE —36TH ST a $E ':TH^ cr 5T BEACH PARK ,32 ST % hS 1600 st ^= 35TH ST c� lA a y�� //90 "N 4• 34TH < ST !� ! yti.,•�`- 89TH $T 0 2 V. A = 33R0 Pl. �"/�L._ 90TH ST 0 9 8 SE 91ST~ 33RD ST^ o \< SE L 12200 92N0 ST =;I ,� v 32NO—� ST E V. A.1IE* COLEMAN r 700 r' o, 4 2 X a POINT ` 31ST ST 7� , N ST Sr !i; <';, rx ,' 700 TH d ST uoo Io yi \MAY CREEK �,� SE-9 •0 St . 29TH ST i . N 28TH PL y 6"O �/ m r 1 NE 28TH ST \ . ` . 4 .- y 1L _28TH-_--SF NE ---IT -----_.} �. .w.1-sE 95rH '.. - : 1 LAKE '7TH 2100 000TH ` ST E ---27T�, "� AIL c r h - '•' i q�F 25'H ST ,,_ z• W 3 Nh so t i 'S-'+t KENNYD Z ,' s� 11 = W KLTONS E =TSrN s �� ;� E. il 11 , _24rH SE w ®l( �.yi�tlJ�g+ on..• gSHINGTON SITE £ 17W <®• 3RD pi } Q' . N B NE RO Si \.� 3 EN g 22110 0 iv a2 4 G3 1-Q 5 NE 215T 3T.1 z : ; ST 22ND$t s y �{ m v a Q .cr sr -0:qi �_ 'NE 20TH ST c 6 ., `,*ram '- �-° uoa i 2300 hELk . SI ' ♦Q'� NE : ,a �' = c" St 6:7ani HLANOS• . Csr RK SS NE rn i W � I Z I ll CLy1WeE J —, e ST 1E .E r .a BOA LAL'CH _ - 24 0 z PLGD `E ii; 32 po W •� h I O NEY i 1?> W =• u> Q Z .' - NE l3TH Z 14rH Si 'el g NE 3i-ELT,NfO ▪ I3TH ST GENE r _ o a Hs l3TH _'< r AL a - T �b BEACHMEMORlPARK NE - 12TH S • r -•• NE `_, \St \ 21G) .,?I:ARK IV ! �25. _ v c4'0 i .vo sr'^► v' ,�� 900 PARK OR — �r r. RENToN$T ihr ) AIRPORT /PL I fn 1111 BOAT LAUNCH //// .""Ra7E� • IIII.Er.. , OR®. 4 _�JEarHSTr1,, BOElNG \\ / / / = z` % hE ,��' �90�.�1� Q ST I� RENTON \ / s \ 9TN _ 177H PL. p PLANT / Z _ a E Q ST 2I r ' z� �c ..�� tvAir NE 126 -Int: Q= g\ - > a . a p 405 h L Fs „E > 7 s Q • 9TH T c:a 7K Z erH 9 •o ,0 ` T� . x, CEDAR Q N :TH ST�_ \ ^ _ _ .."` Jo 8TH y, < RIVER illZ - 900 Zt00i y, 11"- ,.JOW® 7TH :cr-rJ pTRAIL ! Q . NE 6*N ti ♦• . ■� i 3300 � kW I TH ; I Sr :o ! -e� F&iii . E ' ? `,,0:.' r� NE r \^, VICINITY MAP tit GEOTECH 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. CONSULTANTS RENTON, WA deb No.r Delft Lopped By: I Plato` �� � 1 98192 JUNE 1998 A 1 V J _ - / / ' / ___________-- B-5 �B-8 , NM MEI 10 \ 8 B-7 111111:1111 6) alift\ B-12 I 13 B-11 EMI 15 - 9 E ‘7 B-3 . 5 9 B-1 Ina B-6 B-4 I 1 J I -- B-g B"2 ` LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. LEGEND: 6) APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS PROPOSED BUILDINGS A SITE EXPLORATION PLAN 4 GEOTECH 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. CONSULTANTS RENTON, WA ✓00 No.: Dole+ Sco/e P/oJe -``�� __ 98'I 92 JUNE 1998 2 1 BORING 1 4 �°� 'CC" $° 4� 5afie ��G Description _ 2" asphalt over 65 1 I Brown/tan, slightly silty, fine-to medium-grained SAND, moist, very dense 5 — 82 2 1 10 — 82 3 1 SM -with some pebbles 15 — 91 41 20 — 60/6" 5 II * Test boring was terminated at 20.5 feet during drilling on May 14, 1998. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. 25 - - 30 — 35 — 40-- BORING LOG G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton,Washington ♦ _ �� Job No: Date: 1Logged by: Plate: 98192 May 1998 EOP 3 ti BORING 2 < 5 00 ,1142%,.C �e�Qtie JSG� Description Grass Tan, silty, ravell SAND with root fibers, fine-to medium-grained, moist, very dense 5 — 59 2 1 SM 10 — 50/2" 3 ■ 15 76 4 I Tan, slightly silty SAND with some gravel, fine-to medium-grained, moist, very dense ISM) 20 — 1 73/6" 5 ■ -becomes gravelly and wet * Test boring was terminated at 20.5 feet during drilling on May 14, 1998. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 20 feet during drilling. 25 - - 30 - - • — 35 — 40— BORING LOG G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton,Washington Job No: I Date: 1Loggedb/: 'Plate: 98192 May 1998 4 °� BORING 3 �e5ti ��aro�°�ti° 4� 5a�4 \yS Description _ Grass Tan, silty, gravelly SAND with some organics, fine-to medium-grained, moist, 15 1 , medium-dense (FILL) 5 1 5 2 ' -becomes gray, very moist, very loose 10 — 11 3O -becomes brown/black with organics, medium-dense FILL -becomes gray 15 — 19 4 ' 20 — 25 5 1 -with fine root fibers and wood chips 25 — 55 6 ' snn Gray, silty, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, very dense Test boring was terminated at 26.5 feet during drilling on May 14, 1998. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 5 feet during drilling. 30 — 35 — 40-- BORING LOG G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington _— Job No: Date: Logged by: (Plate: 98192 May 1998 EOP 5 °k. BORING 4 40 ��� ��aro���ti° 4�< �a �SG� Description Grass and gravel surfacing over — — 31 1 FILL Brown/black, slightly silty SAND with some gravel and organics, moist, dense — (FILL) 5 }III 18 2 ' SP Graydium-dense, slightly silty SAND with some gravel, fine-to medium-grained, moist, SM me 10 — 54/6" 3 ■ Tan/brown, slightly silty, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, moist, very dense — 1SP — SM — 15 — 60/6" 4 ■ * Test boring was terminated at 15.5 feet during drilling on May 14, 1998. — * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. 20 — 25 - - 30 — 35 — 40— BORING LOG ___:,,, G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington ®� Job No: ' Date: Logged by: I Plate: r� 98192 May 1998 EOP 6 � BORING 5 06 \e„ ce�o,� fa�`e��o�'4�< 40, 4' Description `" asphalt and 2"crushed rock 60/4" 1 ' Brown, silty, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, moist, very dense .. (Glacial Till) 5 — 60/6" 2 ■ ISM 10 - 50/4" 3 ■ 15 — y 50/1" 4 II 20 wet 20 56/6' 5 ■ -becomes less silty * Test boring was terminated at 20.5 feet during drilling on May 15, 1998. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 15 feet during drilling. 25 30 — 35 -- 40 — BORING LOG GEOTECH41 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard `' CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton,Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: 'Plate: 98192 May 1998 EOP 7 BORING 6 %ei%N.0 40.,0\0 ti° � / / Description Grass Tan/brown, silty, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, medium- - 30 1 I dense (FILL) FILL 5 — 22 2 Gray, silty, gravelly SAND with extensive organics, fine-to medium-grained, 10 — 6 3 ' very moist, loose (FILL) FILL 15 '—' 10 4 ' -becomes very silty 20 r 83 5 I SM Gray, silty, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, very dense * Test boring was terminated at 21.5 feet during drilling on May 15, 1998. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 9 feet during drilling. 25 — 30 — 35 — 40— BORING LOG G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton,Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: 'Plate: 98192 May 1998 EOP 8 BORING 7 4 t a�ti� �4 �� � G� Description 5 _ Grass 10 1 I Brown, slightly silty SAND with gravel and fine root fibers, moist, loose (FILL) 5 — 20 2 1 FILL 10 — 80 3 ' Tan SILT with sand lenses, low plasticity, moist, very dense 15 "'— 74 4 V ML -with orange mottling 20 86 51 * Test boring was terminated at 21.25 feet during drilling on May 15, 1998. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. 25 30 - - 35 — 40— BORING LOG G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton,Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 98192 May 1998 EOP 9 o� BORING 8 � o,�• a`etie �o�- o Qtie I `� e� `�f (=, 4 5a�" Description _ Grass Brown, slightly silty, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, very moist, very 75 1 I I dense SP 5 _ 40 2 I SM - becomes wet 10 — 81 3 to Brown, silty, gravelly SAND with orange mottling, fine-to medium-grained, moist, — very dense SM 15 — 50/5" 4 • 97 5 I 20 — * Test boring was terminated at 18.75 feet during drilling due to auger refusal on May 15, 1998. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 4 feet during drilling. 25 - - 30 - - 35 — 40— BORING LOG GEOTECH 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton,Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 98192 May 1998 EOP 10 oN, BORING 9 9QI 4( c" Qe 5i .5G Description 2" of asphalt over Brown to gray, silty SAND with some gravel, fine-to medium-grained, very moist, loose (FILL) 5 14 1 ! FILL 10 - 6 2O Brown-gray, slightly silty, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, very dense 15 — 65 3 1 — SP SM 20 — 59 4 I * Test boring was terminated at 21.5 feet during drilling on June 9,1998. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. 25 - - 30 35 — 40— BORING LOG GEOTECH 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: ' Date: Logged by: Plate: 98192 May 1998 DBG 11 BORING 10 �`ti �- a,1/40 tio�y<4o Q `��� `� ro 4 a \) Description 4" of asphalt over Brown-gray, silty SAND with gravel, moist, loose (FILL) 5 — 46 1 1 -becomes gravelly FILL 10 - 16 2 I -with some wood debris 15 — 50/4" 3 ' Gray, silty, gravelly SAND, very moist to wet, very dense _ SM 20 — 61 4 ' * Test boring was terminated at 21.5 feel during drilling on June 9, 1998. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. 25 — 30 - - 35 — 40— BORING LOG G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington _®! Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 98192 May 1998 DBG 12 BORING 11 ��� o,� i�•o�5 40 4tie � � Faro ti 4 dfi v Description Grass over Brown, gravelly SAND with some silt, dry to moist, medium-dense (FILL) - becomes less gravelly 5 _ 36 1 f FILL 10 — 1 11 2 1 Dark brown, silty SAND with organics, wet, loose (TOPSOIL) I!I I'I'I'i Dark gray, silty SAND, fine-to medium-grained, wet, loose SM 15 — 50/4" 3 1 Gray-brown, silty SAND with some gravel, very moist, very dense (Glacial Till) SM .. 50/2" 4 ■ * Test boring was terminated at 18 feet due to Auger refusal during drilling on 20 — June 9, 1998. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 10 feet during drilling. 25 — 30 35 — 40— BORING LOG G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 98192 May 1998 DB 13 61/4. BORING 12 9ei `�(Caro 4 ‘) Description Grass 5 — Brown-gray, silty SAND with some gravel, very moist to wet, loose to medium- 14 1 1 dense (FILL) FILL 10 - 4 2 ' 15 — 13 3 1 Dark brown, silty SAND with organics, very moist, loose (TOPSOIL) Dark gray, silty SAND with some gravel, very moist, loose 20 — 49 4 ' - becomes wet, dense SM 25 — 60 5 ■ - becomes less silty * Test boring was terminated at 26 feet during drilling on June 9, 1998. _411,, * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 12 feet during drilling. 30 - - 35 — 40 — BORING LOG At, G E O T E C H 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 98192 May 1998 DBG 14 Slope backfil/ away from foundation. ` \ ✓�. TIGHTL/NE ROOF DRAIN Do not connect to footing drain. BACKF/L L See text for VAPOR BARR/ER requirements. SLAB _�— WASHED ROCK ° •• • • "� �: ; • 4"min. •.o.o. i. • 6 min. .• % t FREE-DRAINING NONWOVEN GEOTEXT/LE SAND/GRAVEL FILTER FABRIC 4"PERFORATED HARD PVC P/PE Invert at least as low as footing and/or craw/ space. Slope to drain. Place weepholes downward. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL GEOTECH CONSULTANTS 2100 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. RENTON, WA �l Job No., Dote: Seale, Rote: 98192 JUNE 1998 N.T.S. 15 q8-a3 C(3) TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS K. Prepared for Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST 4012 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033-7866 . •'I f Transportation Planning & Engineering , Inc. 2101 - 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 455.5320 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST 4011 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033-7866 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th Ave. N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone - (425) 455-5320 FAX - (425) 453-7180 June 16, 1998 17, $ . . JAe. 'o� WAS/�f��<QtP /-.1; 0) 6(/6/4, • SIOI:ALC • [EXPIRES 4131 QQ 1 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th AVENUE N E .SUITE 110-BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 TELEPHONE(425)455-5320 VICTOR H BISHOP P E President 4VID H ENGEH PE Vice President FACSIMILE(425)453-7180 June 16, 1998 Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST 4010 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Suite 330 Kirkland, WA 98033-7866 Re: Tamaron Pointe Apartments — Renton Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Waylnad We are pleased to present this traffic impact analysis for the proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments project consisting of 182 apartment units. This project will replace 92 mobile homes that currently exist on the subject site. The project is located south of Burnett Ave. N. on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. in the City of Renton. We have visited the project site and surrounding with street network, and have based the scope of this analysis on a telephone conversation with Mr. Clint Morgan of the City of Renton. Based on our telephone conversation, the following intersections were identified for analysis. Burnett Ave. N./Lk. Washington Blvd. N. Site Driveway/Lk. Washington Blvd. N. The summary, conclusions and recommendations begin on page 6 of this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the site and the surrounding street network. Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by RMA dated June 9, 1998. The plan consists of 182 apartment units, leasing office, 372 parking stalls and two accesses onto Lake Washington Blvd. North. Both these accesses exist. Full development of the Tamaron Pointe Apartments project is expected to occur by 2000; therefore, 2000 is used as the horizon year for the purposes of this study. R067498Rpt Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 2 — EXISTING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS The project site is developed. This development consists of 92 mobile homes, internal circulation, parking and two access driveways onto the adjacent street system. Street Facilities Figure 3 shows existing traffic control, number of street lanes, number of approach lanes at intersections, and other pertinent information. The primary streets within the study area are classified in the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: SR 405 Freeway N.E. Park Dr. Major Arterial Lake Washington Blvd. N. Secondary Arterial N. 30th Street Secondary Arterial Burnett Ave. N. Collector Arterial Lake Washington Blvd. N. in the vicinity of the project site is a 2-lane secondary arterial street with paved bicycle lanes on both sides. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. Intersections along the corridor are controlled by stop signs. A number of these intersections are all way stop control. Based on the criteria contained in section "2B-4 Stop Sign (R1-1)" in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) many of these stop signs appear unwarranted. The MUTCD specifically states "STOP signs should not be used for speed control". Further unwarranted stop signs breed disrespect by motorists. Transit Facilities Metro Transit is the transit agency which serves the study area. According to the Metro Transit System Map, September, 1997 the nearest transit service is located on N. 30th St., north of the subject site. The route serving N. 30th St. is #105. Also N. 30th St. is within a DART service area. R067498Rpt Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 3 — EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Figure 4 shows existing PM peak hour traffic volumes at pertinent intersection and streets affected by site-generated traffic. Level of Service Analysis Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic flow, and the perception of these conditions by drivers or passengers. These conditions include factors such as speed, delay, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Levels of service are given letter designations, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions (free flow, little delay) and LOS F the worst (congestion, long delays). Generally, LOS A and B are high, LOS C and D are moderate, and LOS E and F are low. Table 1 shows calculated levels of service (LOS) for existing conditions at the pertinent street intersections. The LOS were calculated using the procedures in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209 3rd Edition updated 1994. The LOS shown indicate overall intersection operation. At intersections, LOS is determined by the calculated average delay per vehicle. The LOS and corresponding average delay in seconds are as follows: TYPE OF A B C D E F INTERSECTION Signalized <5.0 >5.0 and >15.0 and >25.0 and >40.0 and >60.0 <15.0 <25.0 <40.0 <60.0 Stop Sign Control <5.0 >5 and >10 and >20 and >30 and >45 <10 < 20 < 30 < 45 The intersection LOS is an average for every vehicle entering the intersection. On occasion specific movements, such as stop sign controlled left turn movements, experience significantly worse LOS than other movements at the intersection. When this is the case other factors such as safety can be considered when determining whether improvements are warranted. R067498Rpf Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 4 — Accident History Traffic accident data was obtained from the City for the period from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1997 on Lake Washington Blvd. N. in the vicinity of the subject site. The City data does not identify any recorded accidents at the Lake Washington Blvd. N./Burnett Ave. N. intersection and only one on Lake Washington Blvd. W. between Burnett Ave. N. and 13th St. North. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT Figure 5 shows projected 2000 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the project. These volumes include the 1998 traffic volume counts plus background growth. The assumed background traffic growth factor used in this report is 5% per year. This rate is conservative. The area in the vicinity of the site is generally developed. Thus the potential for traffic growth induced by nearby development is limited. Table 1 shows calculated LOS for 2000 conditions without the project at the pertinent street intersections. In general, the LOS will remain the same as the existing conditions with small increases in average vehicle delay due to background traffic volume growth. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. The proposed 182 Unit Tamaron Pointe Apartment project is expected to generate the vehicular trips during an average weekday and during the street traffic peak hours as shown in Table 2. Also shown on Table 2 is the calculated trip generation for the existing 92 mobile homes on the subject site. The trip generation is calculated using the trip equations found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, for Apartment and Mobile Home Park (ITE Land Use Codes 220 and 240, respectively). The trip equations were used rather than the trip rates based on the ITE procedure for determining which method is most appropriate for a given set of data. The trip generation values above account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle trips. R067498Rpt I 0 Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 5 — Figure 6 shows the estimated trip distribution and the calculated site-generated traffic volumes. The distribution is based on the characteristics of the street network, existing traffic volume patterns, the location of likely trip origins and destinations (employment, shopping, social and recreational opportunities), expected travel times and on information contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Figure 7 shows the projected 2000 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project. The site-generated PM peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figure 6 were added to the projected background traffic volumes shown on Figure 5 to obtain the Figure 7 volumes. Table 1 shows calculated LOS for 2000 with project conditions at the pertinent street intersections. Both analysis intersections are calculated to operate on good LOS conditions overall. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS The City's Comprehensive Plan establishes a Citywide traffic impact mitigation fee rate of$75.00 per average weekday trip. The fee rate was developed as documented in the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee Support Document, and adopted with resolution no. 3100 and ordinance no. 4527. The fee rate is based on developers paying their fair share (9%) of a 20-year transportation improvement program costing $134,000,000. The Comprehensive Plan states that in addition to the fee, there may be site- specific improvements required by the City to mitigate on-site and adjacent facility impacts. However, on-site and adjacent facility impacts are not defined. The Comprehensive Plan also states that a development may qualify for a reduction of the $75.00 per vehicle trip mitigation fee through certain credits for development incentives, construction of needed transportation improvements (arterial, HOV and transit), through public/private partnerships, and transportation demand management. Specific credits and the amount of the reduction in the mitigation trip rate fee that could result from such credits will be determined on a case by case basis during the development permitting process. R067498Rpt I Mr. John Wayland TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL PACIFIC NORTHWEST June 16, 1998 Page - 6 — SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report uses existing traffic data collected at the pertinent street intersection and roads identified for analysis. Level of service analyses were performed for existing and projected future traffic volumes, using the collected traffic data, for the without project condition. The evaluation of the traffic impact of the proposed project, included adding project generated traffic to the future traffic volume projection and calculating the level of service. The with project traffic operations were then compared to the without project operations. The comparison of traffic operations with and without the project identified that the project will not cause a significant adverse affect on the operation of any of the study intersections. Based on our analysis the Tamaron Pointe Apartment project should be approved with the following traffic mitigation measures: 1. The developer should offer to pay a traffic impact mitigation fee calculated as follows: ($75.00 per AWDT) X (624 AWDT) = $46,800.00. 2. Construct the subject project in accordance with applicable requirements. These requirements may include street lighting, underground existing utilities and frontage improvements. No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. If you have any questions please call me. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. kt14-1) Mark J. J bs, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer MJJ:es R067498Rpt i ifii[ TABLE 1 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY EXISTING PROJECTED PROJECTED INTERSECTION 2000 W/O 2000 W/ PROJECT PROJECT Burnett Ave. N./ ' Lake Washington Blvd. N. Overall A (3.5) A (4.0) A (4.4) Site Driveway/ WB -- -- B (5.3) Lake Washington Blvd. N. Overall -- -- A (0.6) R067498.Rpt i fil[ TABLE 2 TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRIP GENERATION TRIPS TRIPS EXITING DRIVEWAY TIME PERIOD TRIP EQUATION ENTERING TOTAL Proposed Apartment (ITE Land Use 220; 182 Units) Average Weekday T = 5.994(X) + 613 613 1,226 134.114 (50%) (50%) AM Peak Hour T = 0.497(X) + 15 79 94 3.238 (16%) (84%) PM Peak Hour T = 0.541(X) + 78 39 117 18.743 (67%) (33%) Existing Mobile Homes (ITE Land Use 240; 92 Units) Average Weekday T = 3.274(X) + 301 301 602 300.84 (50%) (50%) AM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.577 10 38 48 Ln(X) + 1.259 (21%) (79%) PM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.897 34 21 55 Ln(X) + 0.044 (62%) (38%) Net New (Proposed - Existing) Average Weekday -- 312 312 624 AM Peak Hour -- 5 41 46 PM Peak Hour -- 44 18 62 T = Trips X = 1,000 sq. ft. R067498.Rpt I s, .. 5 -- - .,.,:...A,, ,� sr, SEA-yl-68TH "' s'r n'Lt ., 1, r,n,r. . / W ys` ,:' h•1.L;+, } �� e"ST a roc • SE •rs 69 •k� w l 't L �.�„,); , `, m ;, s,J. 1._ . a'sgIxrms 3Enci.x le- o- g C � frl4dJY• '•. �i s N • :JSt 72ND= I X � t >�: , SET2 0 n N. .:rt kA!a% fY. ;;. `V3' °, ES HAZELAl0O se St T r , S • _ 27 iE 6TF • Jr . _ tp •<PKAN 0 77/ , 7 i 'T rt I ?a,r; ' A • S1 l'.. R i . ,-. CUM, '.., .t :' yy 1.2R # 5T li ,..` , t4K tN ',4 - "44 i n,s"'sr� ATt. .. --- r F zt, L. ua. St / L. l,e ` x if . r' / i. 4 x law n e 2 A rR��+ltm''t' - `t : E k r( o r SE♦791N PE n aE \ qTy ••,'44T _.• "a _x 1 'c4 Tn:P sst 5x �4.,,•\rM1 I.. � \*i I, c ',,�Q �. it - st T. , al,, z`I $� �a v�v ( •• e ty,y�, JE CS),S�`TTM•E- N 13'•.; ;5E \ BOTH ' st ST .. -yy /t t .48S i '�'I PL zJ 11200 g 11600 c q:i 7- t 1t P 'h Y'�T 137TH AV '1:\i SI^lt��'ri. Q W s I I1 S i ^ Y M IN J • 79TH 2 4• r 4, iMY __ • L a t: _ < t•��*Ir1, r•� ow E art.y^,+:. �' u anoo� + ,` �/ r. N 10111 sr a t, 1 I I SE."" tiM SI I Y �tc I ., tatty e. ^ \ ,\ �7\�< \... 1100 L. Sr SE es'_Pr: I r> 1U ' ^� x 4 s ti 2s - St tSix 1. 1✓�` E 1\ `E GPM ,� - 1r S (:^I I `4/v�!M,y �, .38TH ST - c 2E gm st 1 , _ t� I\L�• I `Fi'.r r 'Vic:. f tZ nt•. t - tr c -�;-:',. , - r. n 'A C I5 r'i « E s\� 36TH m F3 t 11 �� �4 nNN'Dut `u rSE BBTH"• F' SiST I •tv:^PAA// 3 .. sT 11600 \f ^. By '1' \ I / �� I � aA ,�'ti hrx IsE 89TN ST J7 4, c`• �N^w',E$c. �.6 11s s I 3 r N \\\ ' j I. <J'� ./ L-1 90TH 5T l . lit.-; '���< \,F, _I {f 33P) S .t SE 91ST ST'I SE 915T •• �f` �s�l`" 1I 33PD ST" r as 1i000 ro• 1;;• WOO ,'?'?fit n.. s SE h� 92N0 S7 IIE 9IST 5T MEI 31sr sr '° sl�j� <�� � • tcE�-' -N `� '� :'� SF si 1 , t liIr:4i:p(—� ` 3 St „, j .31;+. i''^-� : ,i W � + . 's I EIY VA( Y Jri ; © 29TH sr•Jr r' o ay,�V, ii..,, 4' ,n .u1 1 7h Dr "M re° _ z _ '--—T•-1A RD .\ ©28TH PL . .ar- • -yE■Tm 28n1• sr •'L 3` _r r,a- -'-/rlEl°` - y..t. •— `S^•'� -- WE. �P O , sT 7�r ri r:.,Lt-` slEaaA a _1�. z00 -_`�;,R` ~' , NCIGNrs 117.1'PL .rmt �" E, rS� Is' st .zW.r.t. ,1 }} < i .'S[ 100T.a sr PAaI 0 t1„;I:NY, E E sT ;n ,yh' e TM C •s. lono- - J ` E - ig-v"a _,9, LIENS � tii. n r( Re, " - G TH �1' __SE - Ir.,-^ { ®j((ta/alas�u4.�®�lia .. \y « —+- cT_s t i" 100 H `�I EC� N �< RO PL y `3c • i . S, = 107n. , B` R'`NE Oho st ♦ C =4 '< ,• t.1 \ - t�S ,i HEk.iT��,.y : 4.�y • i� St-lU1rm Si I - • 2zNo :soo _ - I 5 • Q ai t <' 22ND ST \r� 1= ik",« SE Ia1H n• ' �Nt zest t$$Lyy�s�j *� 1aoo, sT `- ` '< QZ t17 o® n \ 3[E:Mr e Z RE v E , .7.0. .2�- �.` ._ - 20TH � � - p F � ' +"_�E s: i � i' y C � o � - 17oo Y i700 R • '4y;.; • s . I p. ,t , S� • 7RIIR + r Z i67''1aJ .,' , EE R N. i NE •t •-- • I_ - 5Jq'LMptiN 2AOOi V p' -r i'I, _ ET\N;. < ; Er\ , �D.,:g00 :r ' N®'i i 8 w = g. < 2 iel 1 NE utx � • ��• \ iatE n\\ .r f� = �.: :•,'. 161N,I� Sf_ g 3 NE ]TM PE S ID u �1 1mE Sl 1°.z e 1lm'm. - \ > _ IOd7A1 ' # NE ^ 12TH -ST ,NE �/^; _ T1TH ST 1 `i i l' SE . 112T�Y- - Vr,. \ IE'-'::ACII ivri 4 —z100-11,.., Sz-a.$ ' ,oa'��. E '11Tv NE y 7w rt ttT. i'- Du N - • a el'jA I PARK R w M • . ,T.'St ' E1Ez6. V 1'✓ ---�- 4 '♦ W C�©� y li i CT V .., tZ ri • - 1J �' �� B I< rc _�� � yet. ':'.` turn <_.\ i 4 ry' - . 'NF IOTN ST �� �; ��"41 �� ,`,in 10� '_ , r - WIN .,. - -'1 cn4 s.s NI i= 8 It .ii II% ,4.,:- • ' 2E.2' P ^ 1 IC Nt 919 I - N ' a N '' { • TN . �0 Slf l .."' ■ �p1100 `SIi.IZIST . W : pTEN s,.7- S m: g_-zn. 7TH Si / .S' a . _ _ ?S. 'A. - C I , "Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS*. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS*. It Is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. All rights reserved." (-- VICINITY MAP ,^ FIGURE TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS ' 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 1 I i.,-- 4 T ,,. v 1 .\ . N o' 0 41 ,i,- I • 1,� tier - ,., I * _Alit ►1 VII," VW--=-- Ik1,:ipli au_ 0,o, es, 111too- *tilt 411110....0 11�. 11•eak '1 • ,00 \Ir A PAlt I Ai NI(I,AkIL'i Ye,: A�;1 rma l it).A'A1i'.LI.LPOW PI;:1f)l7:f I'.I. lAMARON POINft APAR1MENTS �' If 0 r , 1 FIGURE SITE PLAN f_ TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I I z N 30th St. 0 \ > Q c L m A `k 411114 I. Project Site 405 r a CD 0 (A S N 5 r L0 o u 3 m z V' LEGEND N Par` f( 0 Traffic Control Signal sI Stop Sign XX mph Posted Speed Limit 0 —+. Approach Lane & Direction XL Number of Roadway Lanes r : !�� FIGURE EXISTING CONDITIONS I _ TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS i 3 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J I N Z N 30th St. not to scale Tuesday j 6/2/98 16:00-17:00 C) c o�n J � m /2 8 , Project Site 405 r 0 co 0 U) z 7 rr 0 0 CO a Z P orV- Or. N LEGEND X—► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volum- & Direction Note: Peak period traffic volumes on Lake Washington Blvd. can be influenced by SR 405 operations EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME rFIGURE TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS i 4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J I I 1 0 z N 30th St. not to scale Q O o E �� CO 7.7 7 ii Project Site 405 1 0 F CD [] S r+- O7 7 CO G a- 0r. P o(\& LEGEND X--► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction ) I- PROJECTED 2000 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME - FIGURE WITHOUT PROJECT ( I\ TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS / 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I z N 30th St. G > 0 Q tnr l� a ass m �s SO� g �3 4111 ?? 9 Project Site 0� sJ 405 1 a CD U) PROJECT TRAFFIC 5 (NET NEW) Daily (706) 0 PM Peak _� 44 Enter a 18 Exit P o<( O(• N 1 PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES & DISTRIBUTION 1FIGURE ( TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS / 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J I 1 A z N 30th St. not to scale d 0 > Q -a') c Ort L- 1i CO 41)I, Project Site 405 r 0 CD N cDA99 (r�� .' ID cp ''p 0 7 Op a Z P oc`� 0(• LEGEND X--► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction * Turning traffic volumes at site driveway does not deduct existing volume / r PROJECTED 2000 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME ^ - FIGURE WITH PROJECT ( \ TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS / 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS J 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLEX.IICO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) LK WASHINGTON BLVD (E-W) BURNETT AVE NORTH Analyst MJJ Date of Analysis 6/4/98 Other Information EXISTING All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRITRITRITR No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 ) 1 ( 0 0 1 ( 0 0 ) 1 0 Volumes 54 0 0 128 72 3 171 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 57 0 3 RT Flow Rate 0 16 0 Approach Flow Rate 57 211 183 Proportion LT 1.00 0.00 0.02 Proportion RT 0.00 0.36 0.00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 183 211 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 394 57 57 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.47 0.41 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.00 0.41 0.47 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 0 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RT, Opposing Approach 0 0 76 LT, Conflicting Approaches 3 57 57 RT, Conflicting Approaches 76 0 0 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.02 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.00 0.36 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.01 1.00 1.00 Proportion RI, Conflicting Approaches 0.19 0.00 0.00 Approach Capacity 382 547 605 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach VC Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS WB 57 382 0.15 1.8 A NB 211 547 0.39 4.3 A SB 183 605 0.30 3.2 A Intersection Delay = 3.5 level of Service (Intersection) = A (2) HCS• Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLFU.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) LK WASHINGTON BLVD (E-W) BURNETT AVE NORTH Analyst MJJ Date of Analysis 6/4/98 Other Information 2000 W/O PROJECT All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRLTRLTRLTR ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- tlo. Lanes 0 0 0 0 ) 1 ( 0 0 1 ( 0 0 ) 1 0 Volumes 60 0 0 141 79 3 189 PNF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet ER WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 63 0 3 RT Flow Rate 0 83 0 Approach Flow Rate 63 231 202 Proportion LT 1.00 0.00 0.01 Proportion RT 0.00 0.36 0.00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 202 231 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 433 63 63 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.47 0.41 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.00 0.41 0.47 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 0 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RI, Opposing Approach 0 0 83 LT, Conflicting Approaches 3 63 63 RT, Conflicting Approaches 83 0 0 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.01 0.00 Proportion RI, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.00 0.36 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.01 1.00 1.00 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.19 0.00 0.00 Approach Capacity 382 546 605 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS WB 63 382 0.16 1.9 A NB 231 546 0.42 5.0 A SB 202 605 0.33 3.6 A Intersection Delay 4.0 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLWP.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) LK WASHINGTON BLVD (E-W) BURNETT AVE NORTH Analyst MJJ Date of Analysis 6/4/98 Other Information 2000 W/ PROJECT All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LTRLTRLTRLTR No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 ) 1 ( 0 0 1 ( 0 0 ( 1 0 Volumes 67 0 0 148 82 3 207 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB 58 LT Flow Rat.a 71 0 3 RI Flow Rate 0 86 0 Approach Flow Rate 71 242 221 Proportion LT 1.00 0.00 0.01 Proportion RI 0.00 0.36 0.00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 221 242 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 463 71 71 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.13 0.45 0.41 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.00 0.41 0.45 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 0 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RT, Opposing Approach 0 0 86 LT, Conflicting Approaches 3 71 71 PT, Conflicting Approaches 86 0 0 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.01 0.00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.00 0.00 0.36 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.01 1.00 1.00 Proportion RI, Conflicting Approaches 0.19 0.00 0.00 Approach Capacity 387 539 602 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS WB 71 387 0.18 2.0 A NB 242 539 0.45 5.5 B SB 221 602 0.37 4.0 A Intersection Delay = 4.4 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS• Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLDR.HCO Page 1 Cente► For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) LK WASHINGTON BLVD (E-W) SITE ACCESS Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst MJJ Date of Analysis 6/4/98 Other Information 2000 W/ PROJECT Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LTRLTRLTRLTR No. Lanes 0 1 ( 0 0 ) 1 0 0 0 0 0 ) 1 ( 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 42 220 42 249 21 0 20 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (1) PCE's 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 • Adjustment Factors — Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 ( ) HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABLOR.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 160 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1149 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1149 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 276 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1266 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1266 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.96 Step 3: TH from Minor Street W8 EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 466 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 621 • Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 593 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 466 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 569 Major LI, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 543 (C? HCS• Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d LKWABIOR.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) W8 L 24 543 ) WE T 0 593 ) 732 5.3 0.1 B 5.3 WE R 23 1149 ) SE L 48 1266 3.0 0.0 A 0.4 Intersection Delay = 0.6 sec/veh 1 ( TRAFFICOUNT Site Code : RENTON, WA. PAGE: 1 : BURNETT AVENUE N. FILE: TP1538SP : LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. Movements by: Primary DATE: 6/02/98 Time .... From North .... .... From East .... .... From South .... .... From West .... Vehicle TRUCK Begin TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT TRUCK RT THRU LT Total Total 4:00 PM 0 0 0 13 1 19 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 1 109 1 4:15 1 0 0 11 0 20 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 42 0 102 2 4:30 0 0 0 16 0 22 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 2 114 0 4:45 0 0 0 14 1 11 32 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 43 0 100 4 HR TOTAL 1 0 0 54 2 72 128 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 168 3 425 7 5:00 PM 0 0 0 19 0 12 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 25 0 85 1 5:15 0 0 0 12 1 12 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 85 1 5:30 0 0 0 12 0 22 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 109 0 5:45 0 0 0 8 0 19 33 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 26 0 86 1 HR TOTAL 0 0 0 51 1 65 129 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 120 0 365 3 DAY TOTAL 1 0 0 105 3 137 257 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 288 3 790 10 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.80 0 0 0 61 61 - 0 0 t100 East 4:00 PM 0.85 2 72 128 0 200 - 36 64 0 South 4:00 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 4:00 PM 0.91 4 0 168 3 171 - 0 98 2 Entire Intersection North 4:00 PM 0.84 1 0 0 54 54 - 0 .0 t100 Bast 0.85 2 72 128 0 200 - 36 64 0 South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 0.91 4 0 168 3 171 - 0 98 2 (✓ TRAFFICOUNT Site Code : RENTON, WA. PAGE: 1 : BURNETT AVENUE N. FILE: TP1538SP : LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. Movements by: Primary DATE: 6/02/98 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.80 0 0 0 61 61 - 0 0 1100 East 4:00 PM 0.85 2 72 128 0 200 - 36 64 0 South 4:00 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 4:00 PM 0.91 4 0 168 3 171 - 0 98 2 Entire Intersection North 4:00 PM 0,84 1 0 0 54 54 - 0 0 1100 East 0.85 2 72 128 0 200 - 36 64 0 South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 0.91 4 0 168 3 171 - 0 98 2 BURNETT AVENUE N. 1mm N W+E WaMMAW V h!hM1N•h'.V J.Vl.4'J.'%.Ll{'f:l:V1.V�'.'� .... : 5:..is : is [TRUCK] 1 0 0 54 M ........':':'::':' ' 2 [TRUCK] ::1::::::::l::::::.V:l:1::::1:::. :f::L 'J!!l:::ff:!. 54r 72 YJ}.'JIXrA4hY%J.!J:Y.4!{:%.'.•1.4:: ::•::::.�.4{'� N'`V ?' LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. 200 128 ;;;;;;;;;;;;; 3 0 168 171 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N. pi manimpommong !.!.L::•::•: •.�. v.�::h\`?f!1l.VI.V.V.1•!lrK4L•{Jh!IAL 0 J 0 '1J.•. JJ.L•J:J}.VJ.VA•.V.!flgg.Y1I:.':1JJ.VhY%h\ [TRUCK] 4 :» :':< :<VER "a 0 0 0 0 [TRUCK] ................................... .................................... V.V.YJ.'.Yh4•.'.Vfh'.L4'Jl.\L•I.41'}.Yf.•.h .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... \1Y.1'Ah•X.'NhV.'.'.V.WJJJJJX.4•.X'. .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .8 BURNETT AVENUE N. ... ., ., I C z N 30th St. \ . ai e':.• < 2 0"/,0 4-, 4-i -• 1' su--1-T-- ---- • . ,. ._...:_f,4 , II E __/: - - -. Z CV-4 b '' 0 Project Site ) .., , ,-- - 0 • 7k-- co 3 •/,•„1,-: P.1c , 14 CI il 0 s'.:‘• ', in . ' • 1 u3 et. Iv -.,i, 0 n 03 2- cl- , 10 , .it ,. 0(• 9 06( \ 1 , \ ... -,•,N . • ,)h .- ' . ; \-• ,..., ,:, • •4 ) .• ...., ..., ., } [ . PROTO VIIIIIIIINIPIMNMIIIIMIIIIIIbP 11111111.11111111111111111111•Po " ''.\ 1 FIGURE 11_ 2 City of Renton Traffic Accident Record System Corridor Report June 04, 1998 Corridor: LAKE WASH BLVD N between GARDEN AVE N and BURNETT AVE N i Report Period: January 01, 1995 to December 31, 1997 f (� Comments: " 1 C Report requested by Ron Mar, for TPE, 6/4/98 Accident Accident Dir Dir Tot Num Nun PDO Report # Date Location Veh 1 Veh 2 Veh Fat Inj H&R 534 06/07/97 LAKE WASH BLVD N at PARK DR. N N->W E->W 2 0 0 P DAY: Sat TIME: 2100 TYPE OF ACCIDENT: Right Angle 240 04/02/96 LAKE WASH BLVD N between BURNETT AVE N and THIRTIETH ST. N N->S -> 1 0 0 P DAY: Tue TIME: 2345 TYPE OF ACCIDENT: Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Totals: 2 0 0 Page number 1 Traffic Accident Record System 6 Corridor Report Corridor: BURNETT AVE N between LAKE WASH BLVD N and THIRTIETH ST. N Report Period: January 01, 1995 to December 31, 1997 Comments : Report requested by Ron Mar, for TPE, 6/4/98 N O MATCHING DATA FOUND Traffic Accident Record System Location Report Location: HOUSER WY N at PARK DR. N Report Period: January 01, 1995 to December 31, 1997 Comments : Report requested by Ron Mar, for TPE, 6/4/98 N O MATCHING DATA FOUND q8 -(2.3 ,s14-L4 ,c tc TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS Renton, Washington Preliminary Technical Information Report ►0; Ar/ b8612 /:(IjC /S 1 E"G\4' At t ' NA L 1` �r 1iS, EXPIRES: MAY 6, 1999 Prepared By: \. _., r,.. . ,,-r F . . .:..1.3 Richard Klein, PE CU ( OF F : .4 Greg A. Diener, PE Al i r n `i 1.;...3 Pacific Engineering Design, Inc. RECEIVED July 13, 1998 PEDI Job No. 98020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-5 II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 6-8 III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 9 EXISTING VERSUS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 10-11 NARRATIVE AND SUMMARY 12 100-YR,24-HR SCS METHOD CALCULATION 13-19 25-YR AND 100-YR RATIONAL CALCULATIONS 20-21 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS WITH MAPS AND CALCULATION 22-28 IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 29-34 V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 35 VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 36-50 VII. BASIN AND COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS 51 VIII. OTHER PERMITS 52 IX. EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN 53 X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET, RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET AND SKETCH, DECLARATION OF COVENANT 54 XI. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL 55 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW Z PROJECT OVERVIEW The site is comprised of 10.68 acres of land located to the east of Lake Washington Blvd., to the west of I-405,to the south of N. 28th Street, and to the north of N. 20th Street. At present, the site is a mobile home park. About 20.4 acres of land drains toward the site from the east down a steep hill. It is proposed that the mobile home park be replaced with a multi-family apartment complex comprised of about 190 units. The existing on-site drainage system except for a small area near the northwest corner of the site, routes the drainage southward to the southwest corner of the site along Lake Washington Blvd. where an existing drainage system conveys the flow under Lake Washington Blvd. westward through Gene Coulon Park, discharging into Lake Washington. The distance from Lake Washington Boulevard to the discharge point in the lake is approximately 410 feet. The proposed multi-family apartment complex will have roughly the same percentage of impervious area as the existing site. The downstream drainage system piping with the exception of one 60-foot length of storm pipe is adequate to convey the developed flow to Lake Washington. No on-site storm detention facilities are proposed. The inadequate section of downstream piping is proposed to be upgraded from a 12-inch to 24-inch pipe. A bio-swale is proposed to treat the 2-year, 24-hour storm event prior to discharge into the downstream drainage system. • Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Cw.7•..+r,f.. •.M:f'•�i`+'•Ku it h;;i•.... . ,.. �;4 .ti,•.•...^. w•., ►.•.,.u..�.. ..� ,. t •'1: Iy�7�S•1 • �� ! 4 rrj �.:.. r �(.I.:.• i•../'. '::.• _ Y...• 1.1 _§t�.� .; aPaRt� PROJECT:0.b0 10igt. .:: ....t.ti;:'i . •• PAFiT1 �pROJEL''��Olh(t�R:A�1D ;. , �i•�r,. Y..K•w1; 2:�• _ In:� 4� :•••.•..• ti. •.E:•�•se r r' .>:'` .:r�PROJECT;E�G�IEEF �• � �cxi,� r•_, At f.DESCRIPT10N,�t {-• � ri.•.rr,..1•::yr5: i ,.•...-.t,.. , •ihl...•JM.:.wh.Y 1•: Project Owner Trammell Crow Residential Project Name Tamaron Pointe Address 4010 Lake Wash Blvd NE,Suite 330 Kirkland,WA 98033 Location Phone 425-828-3003 Township 23N Project Engineer Greg Diener Range 5E Company Pacific Engineering Design,Inc. Section 5 Address Phone 130 Andover Park E..Suite 300 Project Size 10.68 AC Seattle,WA 98188 206 431-7975 Upstream Drainage Basin Size 20.42 AC :PARTA TYPE;d :PEMAIT`APPAIl gibe 'w�::�:�: ; . r . . M ��,tio:.::s:: Wk..... •;:,.�'�:�,:..:} 'e.::t-y, :'PART 4�O HEM PERIUIITS'��.• "�;-r;. ;. �;_•... ,.+. =`:.k1 i. ri � s.n�ti.4i.n..R,•vt'v'iC..Y:':^:.::'x•.,.!•:tiH:•.:E J�i:c':=n:i� El Subdivision 1-1 DOF/G HPA IT Shoreline Management El Short Subdivision Q COE 404 Rockory 0 Grading 0 DOE Dam Safety El Structural Vaults (l Commercial FEMA Floodplain El Other ►,g,''4 Other Sitd Plan Permit Application El COE Wetlands n HPA • (Multi-Family Development) . .• • y7 ww gyp. t•w • 1.�. ,�, r s .. , t d.•r 11' � � .'irs�.....v,�i•' •w f.•• •A' o• r_ (r� r • 1 C� f•'• p^.�,, .:• !.•,CQ1 MY •:AQti iurac: ep 1N s > = ,.(r{y ,•tt1^+�•5�1���.�4:1 t�.1 A:1V!k *•_i-' i!S�*}�'.�• ��^.�•:`';•y}.! • • .i 4,"4:..w•=rt��.%4f ;;�,w.,?•4 00,a1• a:1s.,f1 ,c.w•.�t.F.•.r..'j3tc7,.l, a1:::i•ri�'i{iir=,•}i Community Kennydale Drainage Basin Cedar River Basin .�� •r• .•, .:r. a••+�!L�•A Y9. �;r1,. ..!r.,h ;• d► v'•. , •1Y•;J:.y'.i7J,'� .7,:ri.� ,�: '�� •(,{�:�" � N.•rri•: 't� .�!,:,. :••!' K 1: �• =��'ii"�•••'-,•.:r.1. .+:•�•r;,' '•;..:',•:!e i••+Np�- PAR' lt6911 E;CiigR1C?E IS.slOQ sit ,•,,r N. t;.X ,•,,., �_�;k,,n� �f; , ,.K;=.r•�.r.:� •_•::..;.y >:•� .. .. � T.�.Tltii.Ze71✓.•'S:t'•:i.:19:.�•w L1:.3.D.'1 t trli. .� v 1•(.'•1��..as ♦ •.r •/' ritr�:f T,`•"i,:.•�•f r'S�•�• �r�t 7.,•tr i•�� •�v;r.,.�'.+•raJti•,rL�::W:.1L:'.'1K=t•1•. ta.•M:=i.•.... ...... •� .r...ir.� El River Floodplain El Stream (l Wetlands 0 Critical Stream Reach Q Seeps/Springs I—I Deprossions/Swalos El High Groundwater Table O Lake n Groundwater Recharge Steep Slopes East side of site 0 Other 0 Lakeside/Erosion Hazard 1. .._AR�I.$V�I.rS �'�4 r� :^*7iR �4. e g V. :41111 ��sZ fi VPY./A• iJ lA • :,11!:.� sk 4 ft 1°':S1l :�•V i : f;1571 • � a r; 7' , ► r a. r_ •1 w. • 11 Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Alderwood(AmB) 0-15% Low Low Alderwood(AkF) 25-50% High High Alderwood(AgD) 25-50°f High High f 1 Additional Sheets Attatched • 1/90 FIGURE 1 Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET ',!�1, ��!:A �.`.' �!II{.:':lft.�.� :%;ik�:�,.j'�li'i 1�5.1.,+• ..1'.• .'+.: • '+:" ): B-:DEVELOpNENT�.LIM1*ATIONS ;,,�:,,.•.. ��•, .r >s:. . ... ...... .. . . .... ...._..,7..: ......_ .LIr.Ka,.v .w....•r ••�.:•rf••.S%•.. ...•X•.`IJr;'� �i•i'`•� '.. .. s. .. •fit•... .. .. It • REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT [� Ch,4-Downstream Analysis [ I 0 a 0 0 F-1 Additional Sheets Attalched PART'9 ESC f�EQUIREMENTS °�;:. ..,.�... + , :,;: �Ii �:1 ; r ..\.... •.. .. .. ..... .• .ri.rli ll 1�?+r t•w I..r� .. • ...• .5,• ..1•... .. • ..I: MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION P 1 Sedimentation Facilities I X 1 Stabilize Exposed Surfaco 157 Stabilized Construction Entrance [ I Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities IXxi Perimeter Runoff Control EX1 Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris El Clearing and Grading Restrictions Fri Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities I I Cover Practices I I Flag Limits of NGPES Construction Sequence I 1 Other I I Other 1 •1: ..,. •..I' j•�` l.'•!:11':1.1.;5. ♦'!'^\ "i: F•1.'��•:w..:Jy ?�1•��•, ..M'4: .L'„'• ; pAiti 10;SUR0ACE:WATER SYSTEM ; en Grass Lined Channel 0 Tank 0 Infiltration Method of Analysis ® Pipe System F-1 Vault El Depression SBUH 100Yr-24Hr El Open Channel El Energy Dissapator I—I Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation 0 Dry Pond 0 Wetland n Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage I I Wet Pond 0 Stream 0 Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation The on-site conveyance system will collect runoff and route to a bio-swale prior to discharge into downstream drainage system. Facility Related Site Limitations I I Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility limitation '4; +,.�. ... ..P:.4.. ..li'•�l�.);;,.. ':t:t,T'1:+.I � :1�F:�4 is>•0% i-.'•!• •N •1+•.�1:••:�! bART11'STRtC?UaALANALYSIS:,;,• �,, ; :;PApY12EbSEMEN• TSRIACTs;a,5. �«Vlayrequl�e spe�lalattrtuci�lrai,revlew) . . •►:. +.a::..a . t. 4'4:.`.4.. 4,11 1_"...'a.::" s r!Y?`a:+:.t IX I Drainage Easement I Cast in Place Vault I I Other I I Access Easement ri Retaining Wall I I Native Growth Protection Easement 0 Rockery>4'High E—1 Tract El Structural on Steep Slope El Other PART:14:•SIGNATURE OEPROFESSIONA��ENGINEER�r`,' , ... " t,..". . . . , 1 , ..• .• I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site. Actual silo conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attatchmonts. To the bost of my knowledge the information provided hero is accurate. sq„«w.r. 4 1/90 /II ran 1.-n it) -to K-r "ter+ u W, kJ. I_:• SEE 625 A4+P —Z� COPTRI(f'T 1996 7/001.2 74/A •• rS ... F ..- _i al 79TN+�"AY '^ S I`^ if I HN,= .Asti S+ . , / 'Sj� 1z•N m �,tr00.s m-�•AY -1111 Ia 12000v - ' S I iN Ste;' ^,.° s, I i � `qr )� C'1 m�"^' 80. ~ off. �' gammas • FE B2jnD v S:41 els .S ,' �y N V 'e ife L I -,. .r,I __y.yyy �o _ .?4y S.'' (J 8'^ ., IJ- 4ry1 • m ra TN �s r = Ar ® S �\` F,rF _ Mi • AV S e.iiit3 I "' rill et,. Na' E'., A/- 4 ` `�: _ ' , glir.7 ' S aFl�'\�_. yT y e ..-. y Y1516a •W t- , - --1 Niiiiii, 'Arm .31NI', {Eg t . AV 7000s - PITAtn_ - Si-. '. .t :b96TH AV SE'. Iti A LOGAII AY 7FI P© iT 1 `'� imai _0111 • • N010N1 fir• Ior 0,YL. 1 1 4 • 4 ®= i/ s � 4 ►+ FRWY '' Ar N g___,____ . NEAD011 � w � < iming ... ,... .,,_____ _____ ... • � JOKES H GH A" E 'g AI E _. �, '�' AV ME 1 Ov jA•. .F:.' pNES.-�_ �' •.o = Ka,R Cif 'M-- l_ � .1‘''''. ...-'I' Ar s f-_ 1-i 3k�E \�`'4\6'���r _ ate_ ��� v o u�Op1 k 'A 3 ��-�--EEE------��� 1 V''i 110TH AV • LINCOLN 1.y ~^_ - ,rt �� .. � Ar N� I A A �•r\ NE I istamp'(r. • BL y0 S .' wVill 7j E Ala Aiulgp E 1 ,� l ABERDEENWET t`'� aS �" S t S�`',6S,a \ mA coo ^� '•irn9113TNPE�'�irtri 1r- t lik 11 I•ISTw� p to, AV y�sr.L�n st $E`E- r .-' a„„3,,,,,.....„,„iiimmu„ ,� 1 xE -,, ; 1 1,{/� :';,."';-,.;,-Y f 8 +'3E = In"�n Q'g g, _ NG3011 E]•o `.��A=1il:�tE�n•*�„� 'w.'- ;y i • iN •, '-Y' \i y y .E INDEx Ar y a F r, • �1 N 1 y >s >� • •. ate.; m NE : ,,. .^T ' N T yr NUst av h7A. � ' ,� •• �FERSON A q` lea . R e' ' 1 v,.o '�' S u =_� rN ,_ NE 'rr[Asa1 Ar AK z - ' . 'A' k • �� $�\ KIRK vE'•7-AVN LO4 \,,, ,'r' a in •k' ■AY��.y _�. .1* ,/ 'ya ♦ a�0.: ," ,`�"Yx 1215T Vl3 5 �, LrNNImD �iiTTjj�' e a /-i: 1,, = _ , . ,,,, s. i %.+7 - P. Mal r 1K 8 7r—Ns 13s.7 _ 4. , y ,$ ,;,,,, •'1) 4o tz ,��o•u 4 v y1.r141 s�r' �o,,' 4 / 8 T-- 17eTN AN �� ;, 8 \^, 1> _ -: , ilray�lli• r iS 1 si M•6-.i s �' .9 12911 =.1 A`t `� :'n fl • q sE W s( Q. arm . "Y S I-i71r / ' 1', p113H5 �,AN ^� ._' ,r C., ,,,rf 4 -O fi'+ � „ ' TON AY nE g4 7T AV *. E ';''",. 4 ' ALA NP �.ig C' 'i°.•e /,_ - i rP . as 'Min s�����-,. 1�11 � 1'1tlL:1•FaA.�rrrA. !'g i � �` 9• � h f{_ -- CM"' �� :pp,,.,a _ rE I A•, CT NEl * 7� NETr� rA9u Ar SMITMAN i a 'o VASApr VIIIOv Cr 1 Di , � Sl rr NI �� AST(f e\ A x1 CT NE ��l� AV CT Nee LMINMAN Iti. - rA�� p1] `• ,^rL YMNd = ',SS AYy-,S\�1JrzN"AP F JfJr;� Cr d MUMPS ••.�� lY w ' 4 - E /l•. is 3S 105"I , is 1... k SIC 13771 AV NE n i MBNDICKtON A N•. ,r 1 1 35 X 1 ' 'S-. a ! L '4 I '��1 �"1. AV mSE� Q s�� I tt' 7. -F8 I �-'�''m 178TH AY SE 2 .. 3 A V !`,_I ueMr�rf4. TH = �' (MALL AV). 138TH N a 1 17BiN i-�, lir�~ SIqs Ix '$1` 1 i 'N N p , :.. S? CJI•AWAD ,F �, AV SE 1 3- :w'y•1= Z I C +'' r.ff r. - 14 's _ __ CO AY 18 ' 4,' • / S 4 ' U7 Il • N y � �J�rV_� ^ r'U6'M AY SE I fi V _ `I4I q 6J/-17"eaisJ' , I w . PtTv t-I - S[ Ar I ! 1—--1 - tt ' \ ,� + ,� Aow _ LZ9 33s d IZ z-•r-3 9NI�i z>.; II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY 6 467i, \ ,\:_)_ ,.. I'l i) ( I, " - taint----':741-77 iii` 6 \91\ ' .. ti,„,-- l; arr ,,,/III\\`.\ . �`�\ ( 1�; 1 {\ I l /, •;,/... I . , ,1 e r A\ \ :1:. \‘‘kq‘\‘‘N \\\ /INSWIlit‘i917011? # ( 111,(.willagrii4loratif al illb. \ .. *%, , •• .‘ , `, tt• . . I .iugit •.„,.\\ L .. A , ..,,..,:4 • ‘..,_____ ...„ \‘‘.‘ , •,:.„,,,,,,,, 11,4k40., )1F,F4-6 , .. („ ..,„ 0 K \ Ski 0‘ '‘';‘‘‘'‘101 0,° 4011‘4111 6711 jig ril Itio ri-N- :-- -11[1111k il,‘0,,ii\wxart i Al ((im i ..distra _ ::\ )1 1 ( . i 7 It,iiiillairillidoi ..,....111 -\. ``\A \ � \ ♦ ` ` t / ` lli111111 1 P� ,,e,,g,,, i s. 1- :,.....,--0 7.- 1\‘‘•1‘1,11‘jtti'l. V- X hi til;r. \\)? N,.. I - 1 lik vs--,--=- _-----Ai, 1 \\ \ 11r* VIIll1 �, \1 1 -..,\.•.:•. \\,.;,;\ - ,o,......:\. , I' I, ,.....:,......?: ,-..:;,.f,„ . e r )c) la (I'll"' P? •ss,' • ‘.\\ , \ '-. . ‘"111111‘1'i'. L 4.avi 11.0% ...7___,_ 1-...-,; -_= _„_-_-= ,43, \‘‘.,. ..‘ \c„.. . „, , . I V A c A sre cf , -:-..ii,s‘,..:.,v,\ Talbi i t \‘‘‘‘‘‘ `� ` 1 1 1 1 •&Lh1J. L 1 _ii w 1 ki , „ , -- , ,..- SIN si 111111„,.. Pii":"N, syregi I, y„., ‘ It; ‘,,‘, . I ., . ... , . .... 1 I .... 0 �i r1 ,. ir , \\ 1 I 1 ,„ \ \, ' j1 t 1 1' \ :!=,--2f.2.,=-7i .; ', '‘ ' ‘‘sotED III . \ .:•_-_-.-.:.-,-......::;„.•\,••••,,,„ ,A c 4 ill IN t+1\\‘‘ alai. . " 4; Ail E-_-::-:--;,'0,0„;',:.;,;;\„p \\, •_. ----, k \ _ \\‘;:,,,,,,,,,„ 'Li%,/„, -:,,--,-.77 t, -- .:-----. 1,%\‘‘‘'‘,•‘%;:\!\;‘‘;‘..,)„"- 1..-:',..._.:--i-..k\'-, ,-- \ ) : �','. \ \ �-- .. \,`" ...1..♦` .�\� 1,`III\ \ 1 � / _ , . ‘\ '..'--:,‘,;‘, ,s,',\‘‘,\;;„‘,:‘-‘;:is\\\\;:,s , ‘ - -`, 1 , -; 1\",\`l11 `, et,),, / , 'i rl I `\ ,`I`\\\\\\\ `1'j11 5„\1;\♦♦,``\\ \`'\`` , : _ __-,\ ' .•, -\\I\\ ! r / 1 1 III 111\\\\ ,\`\\\\ \\\;; ``,\.\\`-', \1t�\ ; \ I i Ilri I 1 I1,\11 11� 1 �..��� `.;`.`� ; O \ \ ,.\ \1 1 .\‘,': 1 1 1 ��ii�� ..i"�I I \\\\1 11 I f / _ I �:- -:..\`\ .\ot‘\\\,\N 1 i\•\\\N \ r \ \, 0�11 r 111 I I1/1 (� - -.. �ii/ _ Ci�_%♦\\.. ,: ♦\ , \\ 1 ' `` 1 \\ \ r 1 I ,�`\411I,11/ I \11 _ S Y4 ` '•.'..` I`\\111``l\ `',1" \ ♦ ;. ! . �.1,1 ,1111I \ 11,E ,/- ♦.` ...11I 1111 \ `,\1„` \ . A,`I\0 11 11 1 I\ 1\ - �.�•� 1 I I I111 1\I - i/= \\1,..w 11 \ �'r // . y'I." 1 1 1 1 1 /' C \,1\ II 1 i /r /�/ ''C_ �.. 11 i/ 1 �\ - 7. 1 Ill %�� ,11III\ , 1if///,,/ O \J\ \\`11`N _ \\ - 4,1 \\\5\I 1‘, IIl.. yi' '---: _ 1\1\ ..• .\1\V/I: l\ • 1 r. \,11 , // \ / ',�n11`l\\\\1,`11`^�� � ��- \\\\\\11 \llll` ��.�. t O .,r�FN, i �`\ 1 \I --,. ��-/"... ,,``\\`\I\\,\• .mow:I` .,\`:',a 4. (� <', 1\ Illitii:\`,-C=.--r$_-*--_,•• • .. --,,ek fl ‘••\ .••FIF I IF \1\\\\. ./ ` \�� `'\` `\\\1 1 I II11111 ti1111111 I 11 ;J`\d .- �\ It 1IIII11111 V 1 1,,,,\ ,I : ,\•\\., • \wn\ntle,.lu^,I„g\\Irummuoln\ \ dd‘d �• It ` I • \I,\„I,Iwylny1hp11 1 r1AnYnt01111, 1 `\, .,1 ` 1,\\1\,P1Titgli111•ri I bNtlf/fIpINI .\ _ Ij r.111tl111A1MrINpIMM.\1 In11P1Affln 11 t t` b -- / !._��� \\ \`� �` \ i li,• ` \`1\\I15RWn Ir\11 IIIOIIMAi/1,1t..A i Q ` \i ,_, 1t,1 °\11 \ '� ( \' \ \t‘i 11 I !(r• '�'it,/,/'jeiMlA s. 'ld 1 qIl % �., rH+' /11 VINE r rk�1F v ` ' \ ''� \I�� \••MA1b� \\ ���� ' J{� ¢ `_�+`;};,r•.\t \l1\III\,\\1;� \. • /► I .G'` `\1 1'r''i%. 1 1 III •J :41.t. ,4,4 111 _, .. ,._ I ..t.•,:f• \'-,) ' : • - 2 TT { V K�Y•'• 29 • j l�� 1 Ili • � .I r . •z KpB 1 x •il 1203...7r.' •AgCm I - � 42e_ _� n gCA 1e R• •Pin i � ,332 : i�� � DI �� F= •• EvB - • v , GAmclt8CouseI e 1 — Kp.D r "V � t • r 25 � 31 D1 j• 111 I4 TA \ ••ii .: Ag0;9m / Son Merc: P 4 /AgC \ r1 tii"--- Jr H. 8 •. . LA . _ ,- ,,.._ lv Q. • • \� a ` EwC j BM a lyjgy e ;, Kpc�r1.• • 9P --• - BA I, zylep,ge,Sch / ,.. ' I 109 • • 71.4' :' OOvD : ` . =i=i�i • r. ',pi ,.Age • • • • . 7, •4•• 3 1;S 1. /. '. Ai; •.. No f 2 • , \ AgC to * 1 Sm South Pot�lt ! 7 _ •- -- •& 0" i 'Eft sfl•_•i'A_,y. ''' . 'N. =143tfttiKennydale �I •II AgC :- • ® • '=\,\s ' ivv i� '�t�+t ) • (f AkF ! I ...�' iu {s .r t..1,,' 4'i•.r ra tr i,.1,..- .ir ••�• • . •'•'l. I AkF EVB d''. c e4 ,� a n, / A� • . ;.� ' '� Coleman Poin \`® r: Y;4.•1 •qq(�S.KL -em✓4; T•P•aa • _-_-- t-_. • -- 1 ..+1- 7�se S°y T a 1 'R 1S ; ry • \ '"11 . •• r- • �� 3T9 v 4 L •••�r ; 7 ! .� �yrb• , + B \e.-C.•ASD i v _ • 0 . ••• 'f. _Nil* h• : ,„ ,, .,• -..-..' _QM" •()J.!,• . ip, _E;ji' BM n 1 gib'1•...:,,.;.ft:-:,!4•4`,..'-,;•',...Zil,aKf- '. - ' .'41.6Vej • • ni,... 1•-:.'in:.*.4. c' ..) ": • "• 1 r.' • n,• z— EvC7r -.—t" '' 1454 14 �Itt`. •p :,� �/) c ryy�$((�• i c I �• n AkF .; .1. . 'S rn:•I. • ' . - In° . ` ''� a r.,t4`•„3 s • \\.711113 y S.4:::....;i47.e1.0.4177::1,:rt.:::::T'Cf'..--1' ' -7 r '..1.'"I'f''IStle.'::2:77;14-7::;:-;IC.:4?%S:''''"Ii ,1 1....-: .� o j.�1 ;L.'''. � • i .. • �� �• Bryn Mawr 11111 'n _• ,:I �.� • 1 "der 1 • _ � I ' .• ! AmC B � �F �� �`BDY Li, •— -. r ,f i I •�I�:�: �• �. Rf1®Jr 238 �� : � r e �,/ N Plant\ \1 - , i z I It TON :. q!.. • �i / ��• !POOVa'itu • fi _ • tell' /Ali , ''G,(>`iv<'« �� \11.RdEzio,v � (�Z'A � R.4 E. R.5 E. RENTON 1.9 MI. 12'30" (Joins sheet 1 1) RdC RENTON 1.7 Ml. Scale 1:24 000 1 4 Y.2 1,4 0 1 1 [--1 I —I r---f—��C �—f — 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 A 5000 �Q( Tn.s map is one of a set of 20. III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 9 PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. ..- , '1OB larhs✓of F,Hk 412/s, 9gozo CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS SHEET NQ �,/J}//�' /I(///� OF 7� CALCULATED BY !9 N /cI CAI 4l DATE 7— -" —9g • I I E I i . i :J . i 1 ; 1Si bet Id h / . DV 4 _a.._...... ; • ids. } .._ C&C". ) I i 1 1 • f I : i 1 • I i r _ _ • •i i ; ii i&I .' '.._...__;7��'_ .Z �¢....._........ I, I .♦_...._.__.... ..........It? ......._...._.._»......._......._ . _. ' ._.1.5'•9v{ i i Li,,,if,g i -17I,n , 5 r /4j Y i : i i.._ c i i 1 } I _' ' i � i i i I i To t I i ��� T1'4/ !I ! ! i i i ! 3 ! ; ° ! • i [ ; i + ` 1 i ti ! i i ' fi i i 4- t•• € 1 i ! i • i _._r. i , i l i i + , i i i i } I i i i• i I I i i 1 i i I i S_. ' i 7 i i ! iititit: i i i i : : itx :: : : : i t ; i 1 i i i ! i I i I ! i 130 ANDOVER PARK EAST, SUITE 300 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 (206) 431-7970 FAX:431-7975 61 PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. JO8 a�"'G yd N PON�C ���S/ 2 CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS SHEET NO. //'�/ � OF CALCULATED BY ' "! , ./e,✓1 DATE /J-/ /-7 -9X// i 1 I I 1 1 i • • I f i 1 /9Y 5 grey! k �r��� l�l.vu5... .........rPC✓✓jVu(iS• i• ! 64C ) I i 'S j ! ! ! : . •••1...'*./...4/ .5 i AI i 4.. /00 ID 7 4 C i 9 ti..7 , .1,..0,..4..1 1 P4 Y.kti 1-i9' reliq i.. .—I / 41 45.. ' ..... . #6- t . 675 o I i i i ' 1 ! 5;2... . : kgr5rift..1 _4..4. i I } I I s I : I I _.�__•.__. —«.. ...«..._.. ....»._ ._.._.._.»._.—._.—._.._....._.�...._ —... ...._a _•._...... __......«.___..._..._._.._._... _.._. _._... . ——« .. __ I I I I I f ; I 1 ' f i 1 I i ' i i f.... ....1 I i • I 1 1 I i ! ! I i ! j TT Cs ✓V/� }. ..r .I•...«...__i..............1 .a...»....«..t......... .t r __...,............i-.I.... 1.]� .............. _»i... ..I.'.. .._....._........._..i• ._.._... �/y//� ...t .«»...-r •_ 14. 3 e r✓�ohs -- 0 1 i i 1 j ? 1 I I i i ! : : iI ii I , I v i I ! , i i ..—.....•...._._..:...«._..a._....._.." o i t......._........_ a _..... r •......._....I.._..._ I ........_..a._..._._..a.«......._.t �......«....»...._....... F......_..«4 .I.. _ a _e• i .._..... I i i ! I f ! : I I 130 ANDOVER PARK EAST, SUITE 300 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 (206) 431-7970 FAX:431-7975 In our calculations, to determine that peak flow leaving the site,we compared the 100-yr. SCS (SBUH)Methodology with the 25-year Rational Method and 100-year Rational Method. For the 100-year SBUH Methodology only, Since the total drainage basin to discharge is not homogeneous due to different soil types and different topography, we broke-up the basin into sub-basins and summed the hydrographs and then compared the flow rates with what they would be if the area was computed as one basin. The results are as follows: Storm Event One-Basin Combined Basin Hydrographs 100-yr. 24-hr. SBUH 10.72 cfs 13.84 cfs 25-yr. Rational 17.95 cfs -- 100-yr. Rational 21.36 cfs -- In doing our downstream analysis, an additional 7.23 acres of off-site area will contribute to the 29.53 acres being routed through our site. The peak flow used for analyzing the downstream drainage system was based on the 100-yr, 24-hr. SBUH Methodology. 12 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM - PROPOSED I. 100-vr., 24-hr. SCS Method (Using SBUH Method) A. Areas 1. On-Site- All "Type C" Soils Area= 10.69 Acres 2. Off-Site a. Type'A' Soils -R-8 Zoning (5-8 Units per acre) 510 x 135 / 2 = 34,425.0 = 0.790 510 x 160 / 2 = 40,800.0 = 0.937 490 x 335 / 2 = 82,075.0 = 1.884 (175 + 565) / 2 x 130 = 48,100.0 = 1.104 142 x 580 = 82,360.0 = 1.891 (610 + 530) / 2 x 145 = 82,650.0 = 1.847 555 x 260 / 2 = 72,150.0 = 1.656 560 x 135 / 2 = 37,800.0 = 0.868 460 x 130 / 2 = 29,900.0 = 0.686 Acres 11,713 Actual Density=±2.5 Units/Acre b. Type 'C' Soils -R-8 Zoning(5-8 Units per acre) • 70 x 50 / 2 = 1750.0 = 0.040 (70 + 150) / 2 x 175 = 19,250.0 = 0.442 270 x 70 / 2 = 9450.0 = 0.217 270 x 160 / 2 = 21,600.0 = 0.496 240 x 55 / 2 = 6600 = 0.152 Acres 1.347 Actual Density=4.45 Units/Acre —45 c. Type'C' Soils - Steep Slopes 130 x 250 = 32,500 = 0.746 (110 + 180) / 2 x 100 = 14,500.0 = 0.333 95 x 100 = 9500.0 = 0.218 (110 + 50) / 2 x 125 = 10,000.0 = 0.230 670 x 250 / 2 = 83,750.0 = 1.923 13 675 x 75 / 2 = 25,312.5 = 0.581 635 x 175 / 2 = 55,562.5 = 1.276 570 x 115 / 2 = 32,775.0 = 0.752 540 x 210 / 2 = 56,700.0 = 1.302 Acres 7.361 Total Off-Site Area= 20.421 Acres B. "CN" Factors 1. On-Site Impervious = 5.43 Acres @ CN= 98 Pervious = 5.26 Acres @ CN= 86 Total Area= 10.69 Acres Portion to Downstream Impervious = 5.083 Acres @ CN= 98 Pervious = 4.025 Acres @ CN = 86 Total Area= 9.11 Acres 2. Off-Site a. Impervious = 0.30 x 11.713 = 351 @ CN= 98 Pervious = 0.70 x 11.713= 8.20 @ CN= 68 b. Impervious = 0.46 x 1.347= 0.62 @ CN = 98 Pervious = 0.54 x 1.347= 0.73 @ CN= 86 c. Pervious = 7.36 @ CN=76 Pervious = 4.03 x 86 + 8.20 x 68 + 0.73 x 86 + 7.36 x 76 20.32 = 20.32@CN = 75.11 C. Tc 1450 LF @ S = 2.00% (Pipes) - 4.07 170 LF @ S = 45% (Sheet Flow-Forest) - 11.95 220 LF @ S = 14.9% (Shallow-Grass) - 0.86 80 LF @ S = 11.2% (Shallow-Grass) - 0.36 300 LF @ S = 11.2% (Sheet-Grass) - 14.98 T= 32.22 Min. D. P= 3.9" -100-yr. - Renton,WA 14 7/13/98 10: 11 : 45 am Pacific Engineering Design Inc page• TAMARON POINTE JOB NO . 98020 DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A NAME : 100-YR . EX . FLOW TO DISCHARGE SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 29 .53 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION : 3 .90 inches AREA . . : 20 .32 Acres 9 .21 Acres TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min CN . . . . 75 . 11 98 .00 TC . . . . • 32 .23 min 32 .23 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 300 .00 ns: 0 . 1500 p2yr : 2 .00 s : 0 . 1120 TcReach - Shallow L : 80 .00 ks: 11 .00 s :0 . 1120 TcReach - Shallow L : 220 .00 ks : 11 .00 s : 0 . 1490 TcReach - Sheet L : 170 .00 ns:0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s : 0 .4500 TcReach - Channel L : 1450 .00 kc : 42 .00 s : 0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 10 .72 cfs VOL : 5 .52 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 7/13/98 10 : 13 : 1 am Pacific Engineering Design Inc page TAMARON POINTE JOB NO . 98020 DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: B NAME : 100-YR . EX . FLOW FROM ON-SITE SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 9 . 11 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION 3 .90 inches AREA . . : 4 .03 Acres 5 .08 Acres TIME INTERVAL . . . . 10 .00 min CN . . . . : 86 .00 98 .00 TO . . . . : 6 .92 min 6 .92 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach -- Sheet L : 300 .00 ns :0 .0110 p2yr : 2 .00 s:0 .0200 TcReach - Channel L : 1150 .00 kc : 42 .00 s :0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 7 .39 cfs VOL : 2 .38 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID : C NAME : 100-YR . EX . FLOW FROM SLOPES SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 7 .36 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION : 3 .90 inches AREA . . : 7 .36 Acres 0 .00 Acres TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min CN . . . . : 76 .00 98 .00 TO . . . . : 17 .55 min 17 .55 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 170 .00 ns :0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s :0 .4500 TcReach - Sheet L: 130 .00 ns:0 .0110 p2yr : 2 .00 s: 0 .0200 TcReach - Channel L : 1320 .00 kc : 42 .00 s : 0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 2 .30 cfs VOL : 1 .02 Ac-ft TIME : 480 m i n BASIN ID : D NAME : 100-YR . EX . FLOW TYPE-C OFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 1 .35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION : 3 .90 inches AREA . . : 0 .73 Acres 0 .62 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 .00 min CN . . . . 86 .00 98 .00 TC . . . . : 21 .78 min 21 .78 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 220 .00 ns :0 .1500 p2yr : 2 .00 s :0 . 1490 TcReach - Sheet L : 80 .00 ns :0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s: 0 .4500 TcReach - Shallow L : 90 .00 ks : 3 .00 s :0 .4500 TcReach - Channel L : 1450 .00 kc : 42 .00 s : 0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 0 .84 cfs VOL : 0 .34 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min 7/13/98 10 : 13: 1 am Pacific Engineering Design Inc page TAMARON POINTE JOB NO . 98020 DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E NAME : 100--YR . EX . FLOW_ FROM TYPE-A SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 11 .71 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION : 3 .90 inches AREA . . : 8 .20 Acres 3 .51 Acres TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min CN . . . . : 68 .00 98 .00 TC . . . . 32 .23 min 32 .23 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach -- Sheet L: 300 .00 ns :0 .1500 p2yr : 2 .00 s:0 . 1120 TcReach - Shallow L : 80 .00 ks: 11 .00 s: 0 . 1120 TcReach - Shallow L : 220 .00 ks: 11 .00 s:0 .1490 TcReach - Sheet L: 170 .00 ns:0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s :0 .4500 TcReach - Channel L : 1450 .00 kc :42 .00 s:0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 3 .30 cfs VOL: 1 .85 Ac-ft TIME: 480 m i n I7 7/13/98 10 : 16 : 8 am Pacific Engineering Design Inc Page TAMARON POINTE J0B NO . 98020 DRAINAGE STUDY HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF - OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min . cf\AcFt Acres 1 13 .839 480 243400 cf 29 .53 e B0S/N - 2 3 .646 480 61437 cf 7 .24 b C D �' e' 3 17 .485 480 304836 cf 36 .77 � • 9 3 . 168 480 45140 cf 9 . 11 Cps, holed 10 4 .906 480 90839 cf 29 .53 / D 11111,1\,,,, 'I'" � \ \ 7 \ Li i:r: _ 1,I)ytita \1 \\11 , I »., iii,,,,\\\..\\‘‘sm ,,,, ,maw ,,,,..6 c,‘ ‘ , , i‘ 0 1 , i 4....„ h \\i, ........//,',/c, , Vii ) ,111fil A itkiii-- --\ ]E7 ,, , ,,\.\\‘‘,‘ , .‘ \\ ....-• h'i'i IMP al I urr- \‘‘‘‘‘‘ \ \ - 0.. \\\\\‘ \ \\ \,‘,‘ ‘ ,s ( ,...,..-.7,,,,,........,„ . ,..t. ‘ \‘ , ‘‘, - , , .,..........., .„„„,.,,,,„_, .. , \ \,..\,„„ , ,,, r,g4fiw: 1 :v. \v\‘‘‘ ‘. ' view 11.-if 0 it, Tin iiig , ......,„,„Frk. iii ,.. .13 A ..,:t, „\\ , \.. ...„, ,,, , 11110" ' m r '\%,,''„-\\ 111'\i,1.b„l\‘l.,‘.:...,.\,‘,,,.‘:,,„,,,...Ai\:t,.‘ %„\\,1„),.... *„••, r,—\t,;,;1,k:4,-1 N'Ii'0.,41iii,1u,N11,g41t21k-,sP.,&_,m: f'4j4CAm6irla/(r1 , g ,:. ,_ _ ,i,,,,,-.l,r: ,, \,„,,‘,,,%,,,,%,,WA,1i‘%1,•,,,\,,A,,,L:,„,,.,,%,\.%lR,- .r1ii.A."i4(14, 7/,PiP..,. ,,,1.l,\.4 /C4i11/e ita imi,i\A\ `♦ r` \ \ \` ,`1,n,11 1 , 1 kiIj.i..I.11P .-.....\\ "."• ',- ' \, ♦ `\\ \ ter' '1 I `ii tIi ; ' .-1,2-1 a-1-1—. ,...i.. , \ .I.:‘\ r ),„2 fa 03016 JA s ,\`\ 1\ \\`\\,.‘„, l t IIZF \ '\,111itih11 C. 4, 1� \s\\\�\ \,^♦ •`\\\\ Y A C•1 1•E 6 , "-. ?,. I.‘\\\ ,1 1 .i1i ' ! cE :ft 1 '{ �� IF ..,..,_ �{,�', . iy", ,..,-; 7 \\‘,-,‘ - \\‘‘‘.‘ ‘ ‘ s ` 1 .'s --irir, \ \ \ 1 it/ .t tilvb\ a gat aftak :(‘‘ .t fit 1/21,11110,,tra, 4,16-is,----4---... --- ist,,„‘, ,.„,,,\‘‘‘. ,, \s, iii„.... 7. '1, 1 1"...: I Ill \ ' \VI\ I I 11 1 1 ' Still fti,,,,,A ‘1, , ,i, ;.,,, . :....; ;......., lit t:. ts'-z---e---, ;,-,`Z% '.‘ , ,‘ Ill • s ttt\\\\ c \ ... ^ \ I . 'IA / ,\\''' '3 \ `, „- :;,I,1, \,..\,.. ,,410. it \\ , i 4 in \---'1 ‘‘‘‘‘‘‘,\\\\‘ ‘\\‘‘q\\ s. .'. ...Z.,..,:.▪ -N '-', ,_,„- ) ...i. ,,1\ \ 1 ,. \ , \♦\t\\`ti\tits\\\.:,• \ 1 j\0`\ I I . 1 . - \\ \\\\ ,\ , .. \ t 1 \i1\+ r �`\\� ,� -_▪ � ' i �11r 1 I 1'i\1�+, \11+ 1 `\� ;����\\�- :.-.\;,;,,:\‘‘‘,,‘,, milks ,-- . . c`3..1.. ):‘,‘,• 1,' ‘,1\\‘‘`\\\‘\\\\`‘‘‘‘‘,\\ ;; `‘‘‘,\"\\,\,',\I‘t,, ,::\:•.A.\\;•`'‘ `‘,.. , 1 \ \% ,\1,1 1\ 11 11 ta.': \ 1\11 \\ j \ \\\\111 1 I I!1 1 C' ♦ _ • - rr r_==_�1� ..\ .\' N \♦. ,\\\ \\\\ r ,`\ r -• I;1, 1,11111I1\ ;111, -rJ;-_-'-1`, \\ ♦.,.:111111111 '\\ \ 'J�� �'\\,+'1\1 \\ ' -r / N1,0,, ,1+,tt Vt tt \ \ -i i' 'i,�r�= .�' �-.. 1 ,1 1{111, t\\ v' \` %\\\\t11 _� ----- V +\ 1l f `` --.�'-%:: VVIIIV V,I IJfNr \ O \1 � \ttl tt, \- -,,11, \\ 1 IC:f f r -- \ .\•C\ 11 r\ , , hV,u, t\ \ t\4\I+,`\\\,1� tf,-__-f--iii9��'- `1V,, .�r 1V ,z,::\ ` 4 `\\\,1, -'- 1 \;71,,4+\II Il1� '` ',1�,;i \ \�\N,\\\V� vw \t\� .``-;\ t ,1 5'\VOW{ yr\ r ..\ \ �b fnv �\\\\\\ l lr. t. .\._ \\' '''''� \\I I t% ',\lii lilt tl\ ` l� V '1I ' rl`\\♦``\I t, \,11111 ,Vv,V\\\ V4\ \ �,�1\,1l` / \ `\\\\\\ \1 1 I 'l 11111 \I I 1 1 I 1,�\ dt1 ` ,\\t\t 11 1 1 1i Illijlij� 1 ' ,,,\a�.,` �ddlldd. 41,�d,ida,\ da,GGtLl.1.l, \ ���� h\\.` \\\t\ 1;111i i tnnr't trunwnronn\ , 1 n til \,eta\b �` � •.�, \, \\ttnuolxumnMutgr\t rrnwrnmun t \ ul RN . \\1T'ik ,1nn16V1minilnrr I 1 imos/ w _-• .. .• tt\2� �'� AA , - � '1',untatmvnun'xaN I uuuvvrrnuur \�S \ \ \,•\\\ \ nnl,\rpVllrlw VI\t UnUq.RNmrrr. nt ,s��\! ..\�- l�a A \ o"vi,��.. t,r`wrnw h:ttwrnw+nm ;1► '' ..! Illt ,yyyyynnnnny, ,,it0' \ ‘4. i Ilt\ \I \ t• I rr, IN�pr%rrrri/I/'11T,tir,\I�. , ' \ ` ` r/l, ` \ 0I., ?/S�n�/ruy 1'1w F`1•M`.. �'\ ` ♦�\,` ' y//i. ` \1 \J'� , ta' '�, rrrrrrLc11,,r�ah: •w1��'��a•O♦`\�\� tom_ ''� \\ \ ` \ \ v` yr , .1`''1� •��'.�} "7tatC\ip\f \\*jj�� V � \`•r � � {�,<��1 err' t,.�\\t\\,\nn I �l \ \ '� \ ' ��Or. T� • �. �:,♦ 1,rri4 is i�\ 1111t,Ilt \�� ,ri. >\� r V �♦♦I/Ir4i�''%�'',: t11111J/III1 e rr �.., I,nl I `\ (\ �. \ 1 If p�i in'\'rry =i!lriy!�/�:i., Onf::r�'rfrr STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM - PROPOSED H. 25-yr Rational Method Total Area= 20.42+ 9.11 = 29.53 Acres P= 3.40" "C" Factor On-Site- 5.08 Ac C = 0.90 9.11 4.03Ac@C = 0.25 Off-Site- 3.51 Ac C3 C = 0.90 8.20Ac@C = 0.25 0.62 Ac C = 0.90 20.42 0.73Ac® C = 0.25 7.36Ac@C = 0.15 C= 9.21 x 0.90 + 12.96 x 0.25 + 7.36 x 0.15 29.53 C= 0.428 Tc = 17.30 Min. (from pipe sizing calcs) LR= (aR) (Tc)- = 2.66 (17.30)4165 LR= 0.417, IR= 3.4 x 0.417= 0.945 Q= CIA= 0.428 x 1.42 x 29.53 = 17.95 cfs III. 100-yr Rational Method -Using Entire Basin A = 29.53 Tc = 17.30 C= 0.456 LR (aR) (Tc)-(bR)= 2.61 (17.30)-0.63 LR= 0.433 IR= P (LR)= 3.90 x 0.433 = 1.69 Q= CIA= 0.428 x 1.69 x 29.53 = 21.36 cfs 2o \k\..i..- ,,,s, ,,,, \\ ‘ ‘\:\\.„)),...\. `-\,'",‘\,\‘.„\,\‘‘,I0‘,-0-,1 ..A..„.. N :...:,.... ` `\ / ,,1„s„:.„,,,..„.\..,,:..:\s,•,_ �„:\\ , ; ;;10 ' ; ; , ,,ti,,,,E(v6 4„t,-,1-,1 Sri ,,,. 'I „ — , L.: __ .\\,,''v‘•., 1-)9::- \\;11 \\ s',\\ .. \t`'\''.•,\ ( - 1 `--,_-- „N,, • ,. '' . 1 5 if‘' Tirjilli I „ it im. -s&\ \ ---- , ...,‘,:‘; '‘,t,,' ',,,,,,..k.‘ . "1, / I' Iv tip si In 1 \ '.:. Ili x. `\ 4 ,\ \ lien ' 1 � p hlr / \ 414, \.ItiliCl"am."' - \1\\/ I11 \1 ,� :), '''• •Ns•‘ ,‘\‘\‘‘ ''\* * --, ‘ , %Ili • s:%6\‘‘ 5,\‘‘‘‘ ‘s.: :::,:-.:•:,',,‘ V ."... \ '''''• A 1 ll 1 .... .14. ii p .jai.y ,eyg..s.„. .„....‘,s .... ',,,,,,,, „‘„•:,• \ 14;91.irrr ,77,,,,,, ‘ 7'21. , .,..... a _lg._ Ac,, r ,,, ,,, \t, , .,,, )14 i :c 1. ,I ,% 7.1 \%‘ ‘ I I A s 1 \A) ' -mail . . -:::...-:\.flo c qv.,`:\`• . (7 \-1,, ,\1\ 1\ ✓ \\\; \ t /71 •F \ .` .,\\11;Iitg11 ill_,r• - 7Ar `\\``\ �(� '"\\; \�YACITEtS -''-.�4\'. " �•``"\\II,t t l\ r Ac...3.:. • -Gov\t:;1�ot 2 A V:\ k 1 .. ''- \I;\; \:;';:',\\;:,,\\•, a\\ ' ;,.- I2.8-0 A.eces - Il, i `�.�._it)►�1.i �..: 1t \1 \ t- III I, riIk ALA" � ., ,gli \:I 11 I I t1111 1 l\���///-� 10-4. .1 ..Wj. :-..411, , ,..., ,,„, , I „- , 1_,,- 1 ,,i.,,._-_, 4s,, ": ' ' Ilill ,.I \ ,,,. ,,,:i„,,,,, , , ,relkt ...._ r„....,,,_:.,_.:„............„:„„ ‘‘‘. . . ..... _ l'IIS'''''''''. \‘‘\"" \\‘‘‘Nri . • \ • 4 Ma \\\1 t1 l ..•\l \\\\\♦\ \\\ \ \..�? \\ . / (2.,,,,,\\‘‘,,,\:,,,,, s, /101‘ly,:, cr,..-.... \\\‘,�\, ilZ , i- -•• ♦\•\,•\\ \\ �sc� \ Ill t 1'1 \ 1 1 / ( c 7 . .; '\`‘` ' \ ',f4 ,1*.A:: _L_,,4 --- ,,,,, ,•\.\\ \Ni,: \•\:`,;.\-„`,‘\'sji_..- ,‘`,,',‘Y,','',T;a0Ni.\\,..\\, 7, \ '‘, % i' , ' ' \,`\1\I , - ill Iv 1 1 t t 1\\\1•\ \\\ ` \`\1it\\111 \\ •\\\`:��,`\\1` / %\ ' 1 11,\\ \ f -p -� I , \ 1 j i 111\1\\1\IIIIIt\111I 1.\ `\�`\\`\\;\ ♦ _ v._ I Ifs:'%01 • "'1 i`, /'// I 1 I I 1 1 �11 t 1 ,,1\I\\\1\\1\\`. \� \,`\\I\\\, _ -����\\`./ �, \\ \ N . \,1,11 r �,1,t,1 (( \ r -_ 1 111 1 111,Ii \1, \ • i Tr 1 /1 It '- I/11 1 I II t 1 f% 1 O`''_—�:::- \, -.`\\ Tb. ' , i , \\,1 \,\ / .\ `♦ _�-.���,�`t11/rllllil;l �S�z'�- /,.=t_=_��-`• Ir-\: \� ,` :��\1\,1`� �. N\\ \ \ i 1 t - \ IIt111I1/ t t _��\\., 1..::: y \ \\1\\\ \\ v `d`1 \ \ •\ / I %� IIIIItI\ti11\1111I,I, ,IIi� %!/. =��\�\\ �;'.�\�t11111tIt\ \ \N11\1'., \\ \\ ... ��Nt,,,,olt\1111t11I1,\ , %.��./-�-_=_� � \\\1 1111,1111 t\\ -„♦.\`\\. 1 1 _-_,!ire :�\t :-' ) 1 I 1//// \ /\l 1�� 11\Il1 \ \ I I , /11I `.�� ,i��i�i_`.' 111\ll I1* :•Il Ir/1�� \1 \ / 1 1 I ���� i' \,111 1111,0 • \I I f/1/ \ \,{ / \ lit 1 \I 1 \\\11 I11`\__.,��% \\t1,\11 r1\\'t,- \11"IN' 1 \ 1'11 / 4 t 1+\1 1 1\\..t_ � -'i-i5 i����` \„\\\I\1I1 ..� \llla • ��-. O \\ -•'`\\ \1 Y.=:����� - •. ,\ \ ` ,,..,ice . \ `\tIN1\ I I �\.'ma's"��i�.§•:. n �-/_.. �� \\ \ \\1;:�• -•�.\\\,\�.`\•11 tt Deli \ \\\.` -' 1 1i 4-- 4 �tt\v,t1 1 / 1 ��`�-t'==_������� `�`\ :\ \`\,t \ .•\Il,r'I;II 1 ,„ 11 j1Ut1 \ \ \ `� •� r •d\\�\ I \1 1 l \Illlh 1 / ,\11" 1\ 11j11 jttill \tl/1rt11t \\�I_ s 1�11uv ` \�. � ``,\\\\\\\1 I 1 II,IIIIII 1111,1111 /,, ,,,,,.. ,,,, \ ..„,,1 -,\1\„\ � � viifii, \,\1\ 1) 1111 I I II11111 I11\h1p •�\\1 I t\j 1 1 111 \ II I1,a1\„\ .. \,Iaadl�aalhi,Wl4ia.\ �a,G�u•GI.1, , d\ti` ��I' \\,1\uulue\mt:tnn;`vuuwnnu,l t` �1.\,\muntuuautyulM \ tr nullm�n I,. 1 \ r r�xxuurmn \ o��,\ �11'1.}I' \ ` nMnpNIIRIMtI1,Nx1 ,t ! °*lunlmnvvl�n'uu+\vuurxxuunl n _ \ \ \ \�`y, y. ,, ^111\ngttMtcn 1qt,Inrxnl,Irxmr, �, •••• : \ .,..... (r.‘,_.\,\ ,.... .,.. . , •,t, .. 1I ` �wt \\.1 % N.‘ 1 Lis j Irl / I///i///i� 1a1"/ ,��• „,..,3 ,,,,. . , , ,..... .... . ,,,,,,,,,,,,,.a.,‘„,..,„..„,,,,,,,, ., „.::..„,... „ :, , , _ -......,..- • \ ,,,,, \ ,. „ \--- iir ,t,,•14,,,vgsi.11 ,,,„,‘,„,‘,4, \ c\ �,__ \ `\e fi !� v i� •� t:2'iG`:\` ,,,'/;i%%:% IIIII,IIIi. \\\` �1 A \. �Ov' •r....l%.�` \ I ri i/ i .�. 1111 Ilrli \�,.� \ 1r I�y�K ♦" \ / in r- t0° �si'�MAI,-yr_-f/ 1/li.P.•:,:;i�ii� `J�4 lf��,/., ��� 11 1 rtll"1\ \r\�\ \ \a `!�.! ;c 11//.;y• i%G:<a.,'><tlln", <•./,(,� // DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The entire site comprising 10.69 acres with the exception of 1.59 acres in the northwest corner and west side will drain southward to the southwest corner of the site. The total off-site area draining through the site to the same point is 20.32 acres. After being routed through the biofiltration swale the discharge will go into a downstream manhole labeled as 1. The peak flow from the site into this manhole is 13.84 cfs using the 100- yr., 24-hour SBUH Methodology. An additional 7.23 acres of off-site area from the east enters the same manhole 1 from a catch basin labeled as 1A. This peak flow is 3.65 cfs using the same 100-yr, 24-hour SBUH Methodology, for a total flow into manhole 1 of 17.49 cfs. Passing this flow through the downstream drainage system all the way to Lake Washington reveals that all of the pipes except for the section between 1 and 2 will be adequate to convey the flow. We will replace this existing section of pipe with a 24-inch pipe which will be more than adequate to handle the flow. The distance from manhole to the discharge point in the lake is about 470 feet. (See attached map on page 23) 22- I W END 36' CMP • ‘ ‘ i; II INTO LAKE WASHINGTON 1l/0) ' IE= 16.5' 11 .. III 11 li 111 •73 vs I I 71 iki. 11 0., ,IN .., - --_ Uf N 11 RI - , �� 7',.� b a Z- c,�; ii bum t) fi �j z 1 Z p b 0 SpMH 48' ,W/GRAY RIM= 26.4 e iciA; — 64 RI ` TOP 24" CMP VERT. PIPE 23.4' _ > FILLED WITH WATER NO /E 1, N -J 9, f� W D 24" CP OTHER PIPES VISIBLE ) i r" C/9 . 5y -� TRACKS / DERRR = 32.8' i- - /2 ter' S — - E END 24" CP �1� IE= 33.5' f �� \\ WEND 48' L x 22.5" HBO CULVERT ��°fo?do ani �o{ loon uq o� 1` / I fP ft}uo 6ullcl ����( >� 'UNDER LAKE WASHINGTON VD N VIP® N IE= 43.2 ''i�`► -z .., A4000//ifr _____,-- ct (,'-- _ * ,w, . - \\ i `. Ar \\ 10 , oe A\ : 4 ,,..----- CP, 0. . /al u �TTT ' ., .);;;,,,,- , a LAid- , k-: .?0.,.-Aii2 E-=-53 3 A AP r 17' .4,. . - IV r--' 0 , fik 0 I. / / ,.. , . ie IV ci /\14 f)-j "v s° ti: ' a i (fes -3 ia' • ° 10 - i r:)f c u -'�-57),F C ' 11 0, ). • v 4 _ 11 -.14., \ 0 • $ IrOr „--- Vt ' ''') si (1),/4 .'77 _It..-to mi . kNc , P" 1 - o P iii / 0 la (/ ) ' 1L j/4 L'; �� A -./../ tea._ i '(�j—� ZI________NO1-24.24" 259.55' i' /C „ cl_ St ;� N a . Off' I - ---- a; L /,! .I' it t \— i544- ojd �ua3Q(po uo 11 r Y 1 - 1 f t -jr.-_ , __H . — itO I - . . i . I i ! I 1 ii --- - •-1 .. _ ! I - --- - I ' s 0065 e-7* 99= -- C.L'ir ;76 n 1a 1 Cx7 t-9.3 •,-i?z l ern —-bi( r'2n/ j C� e 7"�0�g z o .7 M•9 61' 15,Z o ° c/-e-; ° psi'/ „ 1 7G 'l l Q"'fc?,(3 I O C' e ig as cc — — — 6s'2( i9�/dE �!o ' �Z (e��o1g ,1�2. I p db L r lo 141 ,X� 4 0 a efr 0 '0-� --- s'.�I 99�f -t.t iiiii i 10• 04 �' mw. SZZx � G? 5 L/ �� 0 C e 15 asas gam, 19 9 It o �-IS-S ' S i° o 9 Ze f'z .,Z r -f1 N 'Gl , j�'7�6r G�' 2g l '''"P'' I �,� _ 0 0.5;625- 2_"I- 9 11 ' j - (-` 7- -fog---- I - 9 ' Z 17ir,hta c2:31 (FP a�o �Zr Jro - , ?,�-_� 2,__ , 07 0i (,4103! 1A al a (s��) ) C P> 'af' yf "'�7 f 5 S N ('q/ ) dJ dada., suQ sual 5do 77('� i di 7 1Q1. 0 r, -z 216'd ZZd 9 erfw ti0-f7ufo/ J 2_ oa'd Nog's / /-19HLN/ '7'76' NI d3' .la'&' ' -9N/z is 3did • MAN-MADE CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST : Y - FLOW DEPTH B - CHANNEL BOTTOM WIDTH S - CHANNEL SLOPE 0 - FLOWRATE M - CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE N - CHANNEL ROUGHNESS VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED ( Y ,Q ,B ,M ,S OR N ) ? Y Q ( CFS ) ? 17 .49 RESULTS B ( FT ) ? 4 .0 M ( FT/FT ) ? 0 Y= 0 .29 FT S ( FT/FT ) ? .1086 A= 1 .16 SF N ( FT"1/6 ) ? .013 P= 4 .58 FT V= 15 .08 FPS F= 4 .93 SUPER--CRITICAL FLOW (Shift> <Prt Sc> print <Return> repeat <Space Bar> back to menu_ 8D C uL VR Y 47- s = 1 n. 670 ( coHCT&') ,N, '\\`\ \ \\ •,� \ \\tl \ N , �+'\\11'11111111111111111 � i)a � � � ,11V1,11' 1r Igltl,+�d,gl\1'I •d/ 5„1' 1 ,IpW, 1 \ �. '' \\--�Y\���' , \IIII ,1,'1011111;1frr1111 � � I I 1 \ /,‘,\ \ ', \%;,',\,,', ... .9 root Q 1, III IC 11 1 `�+ • o `,; 1,�11�1 �1 I� �IM11111'11{; �;1 1 \ ���Oil lir V 1 _...-� � /� i 1 11 0'1 • �,,1,'d,lljl,,C111,, \'\.. 1 �1 ,,\+1\ upudO I O t;/ y,w.INtill ld�_ _ �:; \\ `; \\ �l l ,i\�,, �Itilll'i 'ltit‘i 7— 'll lh yIJ}�'I.;%�•-`. �,\ ,\\\\ ,` \\+1 I ■ \\\,\`111C1 ,11,1111• \ ' O Itllg4.;:'�. :: ,\,\t\\\\\\„ \1 µ,\,IIII `111, \.ks, ,NiA0 ‘7 ..,. \„. (;:>,..,4,is I\ \..,.... ‘,I,w‘\\,\,,,\.. . ,...,.,z,,.....,,,‘,.. ..,,,..31%t '...,:-..... .: `,A\‘1`,,, I/i .., /./ / 1--i-- •L'?:) 1.1\l\ `\\.,\ \���,�`.� � :;. ::` � \�•\\s♦ 1 r liy II^`,\,\ \ I r , '1 1 I 1 //,1111 \,111\1\\\11111♦♦ `� �`\�,``,\\�.� 1 41• I , 1 1 / 'IIII ll`It,\ \\„\\ \ \, \\ 411•'--i 1 1 I 1 r //r / I 1 I 111\\\\\\., \�••• -\\\\\`\\1�:\ • `-,•,\\ .. 1 1j , • ', e,,,,,, \t. ( go‘,‘„,,,,,.i.„INI / I1 t,,__._. 11 11 111I 1 ,1,,1 \ \ :\ \ r\ \+\1 \ 1 _ I/ /rrl-II1 II 11+ I 111\ ,\ ;_- ;.,.,\\ \` IIIII, ,' � 1IIfC`� s-:= Ij , \1\\I,III/ rr ����: _�.��\\♦ 1``��� \:.s� \ \�,11+U \ � h'�,,N\ '\'- 111!I t,�- i�.�_= -- / 1\\,II11Itr/ \♦� _._ ♦.`, \.�\\`e1 / `�\\�,, '�a\,1ti•, __♦\��lilr/!r/,' ,rr- 'r',i%iiii�:i�/ \��`.'';�♦\ \\\\\� ,'►, ....... \‘‘‘,„\\‘‘ �,\\t 11, `\ Wed�� q,, •-''-yI\P?I,I I;:l�r,, `I11"'-=s�=_-yr/ _`�„ `-\ \`,,,\,\� ‘1`-: • ,-,,,i,\ ‘‘‘‘ \: \ .,\:,‘„,„,,,, �,-`_ ,,,1 .,..-- "' ,,,,1 1, I I t1I/r 1 , 1 \I\1%11 .i %'y7• \ l 1 I r/ ♦ � \1111011 I t /l/I/// ,�"`11 H`'O. 0\'-0 I IIC`L^�.=_ -�N\1,lllltti�, '.'.-•t\Iin C// 11111 .,,-\ cult Q �IMF�t'tirtz's = = / _ \ ,,A\,I\ I �•' ;`nl "-\\+\�. -,:s — �ti\"' Q � , •mot•'==���` ys �_- _-_...--.. ‘. \;j;�.;`;::�.;`^ `\���.`:.�`,`,1�, \\�' \\,\•,,\4‘„- • •- 0 0 �,d , �M1` ` ; ♦♦♦. \` \'•`'. `3♦ \Ily///♦• q,':'. I . � ♦". ,1x 1 ,.\\ �/III\ 1 41--.‘\ '\\‘ii\, ` 1) \ � tl� \:� ,\ '• \4�, '\\1, \ \1'lII,( Illi1 11`II`11n +\\\+ �, .v \ \I+ 11+11,I111� `\1 I1, �\ '\,\'; `\;Ill' ,11\Ill, ,\ 1 t ,11111111 1/I1111 \'\ ♦ III V \\ \ I1 II I II \ 1 \�\still' h,a r iii,\ \ Al, � �,\�,,\t\i,l Illlifiiill\ Iiiilii�I i \`;,illill; V ` l'�\ ` 3 - a �dlldlldi�lldl1•.hbld.\ r;J i1.1,6u11I \I,1,kldll : - I �1bJ`JI,1 �` ��(� \ a1\nnnmulpap \\ u \j ` \, ` ` `„ennpnlNnl(ul,ln 1armnanmlm\ \ rrqumru\ �,\ � � a` \\; niFulmmnlnnn l t uiMnr,Imfnur \ „nMlmmxaw -, - - �.. q ' Ilou,unuvl,uylunn 1lrnerMrrnum \nrrrunm\uu� r\�'S\ '\\, h`\nUu111tIVw_.5,I.yl\I ICIINInrilflrn7r �'IMr-�N11kMf` �•r \r ti / \ .�, �, i ` I N\p141q1(1T'1C,IaNrMllhrnlr•.n� ,,�yly,p�r , '• �1'.Q. 11„\; \\ 1 \ �\{} •- +� '♦ ii,. r 7 S1\�• .,,,.„., .,I,„„.„Mltllm K ..,,IL, \ .r tip; ` 7'�g,6\47 . ► ` .1 ' 1 tllll .•..,\\\'G'g1,111Y1r1 � i/r' ` \ �1�. '' \ ..41%`� i I }!11 �'',,»ti I a'0 rde,,�\IV nq'/� �: �/ ` Ill t k •r i , , ,�. t r; NIH' II\ti`11 M � \ \ \rii: ` I% 1 / � tfi, rn ,•,Yn• N\1p,\.�:\\,\,��,I I d1 ',.k,,-.,,,, ,._ \ �.� .i• 1, it 0 ,. \ r r�„-Sw ,IIII 111 ,(I h — — �. \ � f 1 � 0 9s. �,��/�:�%N.f,==,i 4 /rn� %�:�,= .dllt,IrrrrU1111*I1''� _J° \ - 1., I Vk,\ litiolOVA-$t411 r / -1 /r r'r/.i�'��� sY:;,/i'.r!:z: I 'II�Op�. 1.-l__� t /�r ri/�;,�%/� r.'.i�i r a,ry i _` L-;r� % #�y it �� �vpGi�ii�/rr iiM l�l „ ' � \ //////�'''''' r' .f �%lllrplNbX,r•.t.:"' /' .r /•irr;a/�r:Y�I _) ���lll\\\���,,,.....������JJJJJJ������ .\ y i4i�r't►•iMY ,rr, ��a �i!� .� \ �� \ \ :\ , irl jq/ lull llr,rr///'� r r r I aw\ �. �` //IIII„„rlfhr,1111411,Ifr rril rrrl:.•/; �6�1br \ I I Ifrr rd\ ul 1 nr,;(*.,',vim r .•-1 i /1�1.�i, 4u1 Hour t,,,1 \u \14han \'rl I! n^ ` \ \ . � �•./ IIII UIIII „\\\ .\,„\,\,\ ,,,,I,, 1/.� I Iql l\\\\ \\ll \11\,1\+11\11`1\\\\\\\1\\1111f, I/1 \,,,, \.\ \ ‘\.a `,Y��j�''�..t111111111�jin��ti"`'`,``�'',,\`'; Iu, 4�CII1111I\hl1 1/r, ,1 \ I ll lr lfll///I� , II\11,111111„ \ 1N \U\qldlr�l!!'fll 111 ll� 1 � � Ns--,-....,____. ���c•\J,dl 1 Ill„ 11 ,u\'!'\\`!��, \�}•;�I l f\ ` ', . '`�_�If?� `11)11 II lIlir 1 \•\\ m11/011/yr4r Irr 111/r -.- / j /1Ch1 , dllr'/I illl /r \\\\1\,+�N fylln 11/ r,l I I/ ,, /\ \ ,,,, , :,� `�_/�i .i�•✓►iY'd l�rri4/nlirrq�T^�..11'Il,al, M°dl :,�I,i`�o•- , , ` r hr e r/ii/rr/n// ul /L/ s�,- F-�=,� „._. .. it ` VVV r/r I IIIII I./� I,I,Illlllgllll r/ C�';., .4.,_ Ir :\igtt►:1\. ifip i ' ''. - lik"4 .--",' -' ' „;..1 / / ( \\ \\\\ `.' v . Ji 19h1i"iiC.,, .C�\\\\.\\I,II+%r1crunt,...- (\� _ , 1 \ ` .\ 1\ 1' 1 '/w � ;t S f .9r11i� \- `\11\p111AI PuJ.- , \ 1� ` I ,.L ." 'I(II,,i4sr,� 11 1`i try jN,�"\`Yl4'wr ,40 -' 1 l i \ �.' 1 •�j, �I�, ,tr I I 1t ',tt111t .,11•,f ' .'`.\ �\ 1. , -/ j .'i v:L'/..,//.,rll d .,V �. \ \ n1,117 +1 It i I! , _A\ ,\\\ , 1 L A/l 7/9/98 2 30 15 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page TAMARON POINTE JOB NO . 98020 DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: OF-1 NAME : OFF-SITE FLOW TO DOWNSTREAM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA : 7 .23 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION . .., : 3 .90 inches AREA . . : 5 . 14 Acres 2 .09 Acres TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min CN . . . . : 77 .73 98 .00 TC . . . . : 27 .98 min 27 .98 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 300 .00 ns :0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s : 0 .2530 TcReach - Shallow L : 280 .00 ks :3 .00 s : 0 .3500 TcReach - Shallow L : 440 .00 ks :27 .00 s :0 .0489 TcReach - Channel L : 140 .00 kc : 42 .00 s : 0 .0178 PEAK RATE : 2 .95 cfs VOL : 1 .40 Ac-ft TIME : 480 m i n BASIN ID : OF-2 NAME : OFF-SITE FLOW TO DOWNSTREAM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 4 .25 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION : 3 .90 inches AREA . . : 4 .25 Acres 0 .00 Acres TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min ON . . . . : 76 .00 98 .00 TC . . , . : 27 .98 min 27 .98 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 300 .00 ns :0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s :0 .2530 TcReach - Shallow L : 280 .00 ks : 3 .00 s:0 .3500 TcReach - Shallow L : 440 .00 ks :27 .00 s :0 .0489 TcReach - Channel L : 140 .00 kc :42 .00 s: 0 .0178 PEAK RATE : 1 . 10 cfs VOL : 0 .59 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID: OF-3 NAME : OFF-SITE FLOW TO DOWNSTREAM SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 2 .98 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV • IMP PRECIPITATION : 3 .90 inches AREA . . : 0 .89 Acres 2 .09 Acr_s TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min ON . . . , : 86 .00 98 .00 TO . . . . : 5 .00 m',n , 5 .00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 300 .00 ns : 0 .0110 p2yr : 2 .00 s: 0 .0488 TcReach - Shallow L : 140 .00 ks : 27 .00 s : 0 .0488 TcReach - Channel L : 140 .00 kc : 42 .00 s : 0 .0179 PEAK RATE : 2 .74 cfs VOL : 0 .82 Ac-ft TIME : 470 min 27 7/10/98 1 :42 : 59 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page TAMARON POINTE . JOB NO . 98020 DRAINAGE STUDY HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib rr�� it) NUM RATE . PEAK HYDRO Area `'llao TU 4o-5A/41e cfs min . cf\AcFt Acres 1 13 .839 480 243400 cf 29 .53�- - 2 3 .646 480 61437 cf 7 .24 OF— Z t D r-3 3 17 .48 5 480 304836 cf 36 .77 yyQ i f I-lyD Z 9 3 . 168 480 45140 cf 9 . 11 -4- 10 4 .906 480 90839 cf 29 .53-e- QZ (ah-5,fie 4h ly M 1-Rio-Swq/e QQ. (Tthl) T 81a-5iale 2c' IV. RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS & DESIGN 29 Since no storm detention facilities are proposed,this section shall not apply. However, we will use the space for design of the bio-filtration swale. Bio-Filtration Swale Design Q2 = 3.17 cfs- On-site only(see attached calcs) Assume depth of flow= 8" (wetlands plants) B = 9.64' Total Width=(2'+2'+9.64)x 200= 17.6 155 B* = 17.6 - 2 -2= 13.6 Qioo= 13.84 cfs- Total Drainage Basin- 100-yr flow V= 3.37'/sec(See attached calcs), Y= 0.37' Bio-swale= 155 LF,B = 12.5 Side Slopes= 3:1, S =2.0% 7/10/98 1 : 57 : 8 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page 1 TAMARON POINTE JOB NO . 98020 DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: A-2 NAME : 2-YR . EX . FLOW TO DISCHARGE SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 29 .53 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION : 2 .00 inches AREA . . : 20 .32 Acres 9 .21 Acres TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min ON . . . . : 75 . 11 98 .00 TC . . . . 32 .23 min 32 .23 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 300 .00 ns :0 . 1500 p2yr : 2 .00 s : 0 . 1120 TcReach - Shallow L : 80 .00 ks : 11 .00 s :0 . 1120 TcReach - Shallow L : 220 .00 ks : 11 .00 s : 0 . 1490 TcReach - Sheet L : 170 .00 ns :0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s :0 .4500 TcReach - Channel L : 1450 .00 kc :42 .00 s :0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 3 .37 cfs VOL : 2 .01 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID: B-2 NAME : 2-YR . EX . FLOW FROM ON-SITE SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 9 . 11 Acre• BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE . . . . : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION . . . . : 2 .00 inches AREA . . : 4 .03 Acres 5 .08 Acres TIME INTERVAL . . . . : 10 .00 min CN . . . . : 86 .00 98 .00 TO . . . . : 6 .92 min 6 .92 min, ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 300 .00 ns : 0 .0110 p2yr : 2 .00 s :0 .0200 TcReach - Channel L : 1150 .00 kc: 42 .00 s : 0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 3 . 17 cfs VOL : 1 .04 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID : C-2 NAME : 2-YR . EX . FLOW FROM SLOPES SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 7 .36 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION 2 .00 inches AREA . . : 7 .36 Acres 0 .00 Acre. TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min ON . . . . : 76 .00 98 .00 TO . . . . : 17 .55 min 17 .55 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 170 .00 ns :0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s : 0 .4500 TcReach - Sheet L : 130 .00 ns : 0 .0110 p2yr : 2 .00 s : 0 .0200 TcReach - Channel L : 1320 .00 kc : 42 .00 s : 0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 0 .26 cfs VOL : 0 .25 Ac-ft TIME : 490 min 31 • 7/10/98 1 : 58: 6 pm Pacific Engineering Design Inc page 1 TAMARON POINTE JOB NO . 98020 DRAINAGE STUDY BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D-2 NAME : 2-YR . EX . FLOW TYPE-C OFF SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 1 .35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION : 2 .00 inches AREA . . : 0 .73 Acres 0 .62 Acres TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min CN . . . . : 86 .00 98 .00 TC . . . . : 21 .78 min 21 .78 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 220 .00 ns :0 . 1500 p2yr : 2 .00 s:0 . 1490 TcReach - Sheet L : 80 .00 ns :0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s: 0 .4500 TcReach - Shallow L : 90 .00 ks : 3 .00 5 :0 .4500 TcReach - Channel L : 1450 .00 kc :42 .00 s: 0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 0 .34 cfs VOL : 0 . 14 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min BASIN ID : E-2 NAME : 2-YR . EX . FLOW FROM TYPE-A SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 11 .71 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE : KC24HR PERV IMP PRECIPITATION : 2 .00 inches AREA . . : 8 .20 Acres 3 .51 Acres TIME INTERVAL : 10 .00 min ON . . . . : 68 .00 98 .00 TC . . . . : 32 .23 min 32 .23 min ABSTRACTION COEFF : 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L : 300 .00 ns :0 . 1500 p2yr : 2 .00 s:0 .1120 TcReach - Shallow L : 80 .00 ks: 11 .00 s: 0 . 1120 TcReach - Shallow L : 220 .00 ks : 11 .00 s : 0 . 1490 TcReach - Sheet L : 170 .00 ns:0 .4000 p2yr : 2 .00 s : 0 .4500 TcReach - Channel L : 1450 .00 kc :42 .00 s :0 .0200 PEAK RATE : 1 . 15 cfs VOL : 0 .65 Ac-ft TIME : 480 min 3� MAN-MADE CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST: Y - FLOW DEPTH B, - CHANNEL BOTTOM WIDTH S - CHANNEL SLOPE Q - FLOWRATE M - CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE N - CHANNEL ROUGHNESS VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED ( Y ,Q ,B ,M ,S OR N ) ? B Y ( FT ) ? .667 RESULTS Q ( CFS ) • ? 3 . 17 M ( FT/FT ) ? 3 B= 9 .64 FT S ( FT/FT ) ? .02 A= 7 .77 SF N ( FT'1/6 ) ? .35 P= 13 .86 FT V= 0 .41 FPS F= 0 .10 SUB-CRITICAL FLOW • <Shift> <Prt Sc> print <Return> repeat <Space Bar > hack to menu MAN-MADE CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST : Y - FLOW DEPTH B - CHANNEL BOTTOM WIDTH S - CHANNEL SLOPE Q - FLOWRATE M - CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE N - CHANNEL ROUGHNESS VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED ( Y ,Q ,B ,M ,S OR N ) ? Y • ( CFS ) ? 21 .36 RESULTS B ( FT ) ? 10 M ( FT/FT ) ? 3 Y= 0 .48 FT S ( FT/FT ) ? .02 A= 5 .45 SF N ( FT-1/6 ) ? .030 P= 13 .02 FT V= 3 .92 FPS F= 1 .06 SUPER-CRITICAL FLOW <Shift> <Prt Sc> print <Return> repeat <Space Bar> back to menu 33 MAN-MADE CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST : Y - FLOW DEPTH 8, - CHANNEL BOTTOM WIDTH S CHANNEL SLOPE 0 - FLOWRATE M - CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE N - CHANNEL ROUGHNESS VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED ( Y ,Q ,B ,M ,S OR N ) ? Y O ( CFS ) ? 3 . 17 RESULTS B ( FT ) ? 13 .6 - - - M ( FT/FT ) ? 3 Y= 0 .55 FT S ( FT/FT ) ? .02 A= 8 .44 SF N ( FT-1/6 ) ? .35 P= 17 . 10 FT V= 0 .38 FPS F= 0 .09 SUB--CRITICAL FLOW <Shift> <Prt Sc> print (Return> repeat <Space Bar> back to menu MAN-MADE CHANNELS VARIABLES LIST : Y - FLOW DEPTH B - CHANNEL BOTTOM WIDTH S - CHANNEL SLOPE Q -- FLOWRATE M -- CHANNEL SIDE SLOPE N - CHANNEL ROUGHNESS VARIABLE TO BE SOLVED ( Y ,Q ,B ,M ,S OR N ) ? Y Q ( CFS ) ? 21 .36 RESULTS B ( FT ) ? 13 .6 M ( FT/FT ) ? 3 Y= 0 .40 FT 5 ( FT/FT ) ? .02 A= 5 .94 SF N ( FT-1/6 ) ? .030 P-= 16 . 14 FT V= 3 .60 FPS F= 1 .04 SUPER-CRITICAL FLOW <Shift> <Prt Sc> print <Return> repeat <Space Bar > back to menu V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (At this time we will not include an on-site conveyance system analysis.) VI. SPECIAL REPORTS & STUDIES S6 Jun 17 98 03: 22p (425) 747-8561 p. 2 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments 2100 Lake Washington Boulevard Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed apartment complex in Renton. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. We werc provided with a grading plan dated April 15, 1998 and developed by Pacific Engineering Design. A copy of the Land Title Survey prepared by Hallin and Associates, and dated June 5, 1998 was also provided. The plans illustrated property boundaries, existing topography, and the locations and finish floor elevations for the planned buildings. Based on this information, we anticipate that the existing mobile homes will be removed, and 15 apartment buildings will be constructed on the site. The two existing accesses off Lake Washington Boulevard will be maintained. Several of the buildings are shown to be situated close to the crest of steep slopes that are located along the north and west sides of the property. Buildings 2, 4, and 6 are indicated to be 20 to 30 feet from the toe of steep cut slopes that exist on the eastern side of the site. Farther north, carports and paved areas abut the toes of these steep, eastern slopes. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is a large, irregularly-shaped parcel situated immediately east of Lake Washington Boulevard, near Coulon Park in Renton. Currently developed with the Lake Terrace mobile home park, the property is occupied by numerous mobile homes, and several wood-framed structures. Each of the homes has a small paved parking strip accessed from the asphalt drives that extend through the property. In many locations the asphalt drives have broken up or have experienced noticeable settlement. The remainder of the site is covered with grass, landscaping, or gravel. Based on our observations, the site has undergone extensive grading, likely associated with its development for a mobile home park. The ground surface over the majority of the site slopes gently to moderately down toward the southwest. Along the western and northern sides of the site are steep slopes having inclinations of 50 to 70 percent. Generally, the western slopes, which extend down to the ditch along Lake Washington Boulevard, increase in height from south to north. The maximum height of the western slopes is 30 feet. The steep, northern slope has a height of up to approximately 20 feet. There are some short, steep slopes in the central portion of the site. Along the east side of the site are very steep cut slopes. These slopes have heights of up to 40 feet and are near-vertical in places. During our site visits we observed a small landslide that had previously occurred on the steep, western slope, near the proposed Building 5. This slide had apparently occurred as a shallow slump that affected only the upper approximately 2 feet of soil on the slope. Single-family homes are located north of the site. To the south and southeast *is the Marina Village apartment complex. - • 37 Jun 17 98 03: 23p (4251747-8561 p. 3 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98'192 June xx, 1998 Page 2 Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling 12 test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction and required design criteria, the site topography and access, the subsurface conditions revealed during drilling, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. Borings 1 through 8 were drilled on May 14, 1998, while Borings 9 through 12 were drilled on June 9, 1998. These borings were conducted using a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler. which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 14. The native soils that underlie the site consist of silty sands containing varying amounts of gravel. Where the original topsoil was still in place, the underlying native sands were loose for a depth of several feet. Below this, the soils were dense to very dense, and relatively unweathered. These competent soils have been glacially-compressed. The gradation of the sands varied over the site, and in Boring 7, sandy silt was encountered. In Borings 1, 2, 5, and 8 the soils were very dense, native, silty sands within a few inches of the ground surface. These areas have apparently been stripped of the looser, weathered soils during past grading. A substantial thickness of fill was encountered in Borings 3, 4, 6, 7, and 9 through 12. This fill consisted of silty sand with varying amounts of gravel and organics, and appears to have been used to construct the steep slopes along the north and west sides of the property. The deepest MI was encountered in Borings 3 and 11 to depths of 18 feet and 23 feet, respectively. The fill was generally loose, indicating that it was not compacted at the time of its placement. The fill soils likely originated, at least in part, from cuts made on the eastern side of the property. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. If a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed at a-variety of depths in approximately one half of the borings. The encountered seepage appears to primarily represent groundwater that is perched above the dense, native soils, in the looser fill and native soils. Some groundwater may also have originated from more permeable zones within the dense native soils. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. Typically, the amount of Jun 17 98 03: 23p (4251747-8561 p, 4 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June xx, 1998 Page 3 localized seepage encountered in an excavation will be greatest following periods of extended heavy precipitation. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our observations and subsurface explorations, it appears that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The competent, native soils encountered in the test borings are relatively incompressible, and are suitable to support foundation elements for the planned apartment buildings. No structures should be placed on the existing fill, as this soil is loose and will consolidate under even light foundation loads. Where the dense to very dense, native soils are exposed by the planned building excavations, the structures can be supported on conventional foundations. Overexcavation, then backfilling the overexcavation with structural fill, could be used for buildings where competent native soils lie within approximately 5 feet of the planned bottom of excavation. For areas where deeper fill exists, it will likely be most economical to utilize deep foundations. This will probably affect all of Buildings 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15, and possibly portions of other buildings. Augercast concrete piers or driven, small-diameter pipe piles will likely be the most cost effective deep foundation options for the site. Heavily-reinforced, closely-spaced piers will be needed for the downslope sides of Buildings 11, 13, and 15 to retain soil under the buildings in the event of slope movement. We suggest that test pits be excavated around the proposed buildings once the existing mobile homes have been removed. This would allow a more detailed evaluation of the extent of deep foundations necessary for the construction. The steep, western and northern fill slopes will likely experience soil movement in the foreseeable future. This slope movement could damage facilities constructed between the buildings and the steep slopes. For this reason, we recommend that no critical utilities or structures be located downslope of the western buildings. If possible, in-ground irrigation systems should be avoided in landscaped areas above the steep fill slopes. Broken and leaking sprinkler lines that go undetected can cause slope failures in these conditions. While comprised of very dense soils having high strengths, the cut slopes on the east side of the property will likely experience shallow sloughing over time. This Is a natural process that results from weathering of the exposed soils. Only carports or pavements are located within approximately 50 feet of the cut slopes, where the slopes are tallest. However, Buildings 2, 4, and 6 will be situated approximately 25 feet from the slopes, with yard area likely occupying some of the area between the buildings and the steep slopes. We recommend that, as a minimum, a 4- foot catchment wall be constructed at the toe of the cut slopes to collect, or at least slow, soil that may slough off of these slopes. The Marina Village apartment complex has catchment walls constructed of railroad ties spanning between metal beams embedded into the ground. Similar catchment walls would be appropriate for the Tamaron Pointe project also. Disturbance of the steep, western slopes should be avoided, wherever possible, in order to prevent a decrease in the stability of these slopes. Fill should not be placed within approximately 39 1 Jun 17 98 03: 23p (4251747-8561 p. 5 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98'192 June xx, 1998 Page 4 15 feet of the crest of these slopes. Water from drains and impervious surfaces should not be directed toward, or discharged onto, the steep, western slopes. The on-site soils are silty and fine-grained, which makes them moisture-sensitive. Reuse of the native silty sands as structural fill will only be possible during dry weather and if the excavated soils are prevented from becoming wet prior to placement and compaction. Where very moist to wet soils are encountered during earthwork, they will need to be dried prior to compaction. This is generally only possible during hot, dry weather. Adequate compaction of all fill, including utility backfill, for structural areas must be completed in accordance with our recommendations to limit the potential for settlement. Subgrades for footings and slabs should be protected with a 2- to 4-inch layer of gravel. This re- duces subgrade disturbance due to foot traffic. Additional erosion and subgradc protection meas- ures may be necessary, depending on the conditions encountered during construction. The native soils have poor drainage charactenstics so using them for wall backfill involves a risk that some water may seep through walls. As a minimum, waterproofing should be provided where there will be below-grade, occupied spaces or moisture-sensitive areas, such as storage and me- chanical rooms. In general, the more care and expense taken during the initial drainage and wa- terproofing installation, the fewer water problems that will develop later. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. Conventional Foundations The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed, medium-dense to very dense, native soil or on structural fill placed above this competent, native soil. See the later sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath Structures. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 12 and 16 inches, respectively. They should be bottomed at least 12 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for frost protection. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand. Overexcavation may be required below the footings to expose competent, native soil. Unless lean concrete is used to fill an overexcavated hole, the overexcavation-must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending 2 feet below the bottom of a 3-foot-wide footing must be at least 5 feet wide at the base of the excavation. If lean concrete is used, the overexcavation need only extend 6 inches beyond the edges of the footing. An allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings constructed according to the above recommendations. A one-third increase in this design bearing Jun 17 98 03: 23p t425J747-8561 p. 6 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June xx, 1998 Page 5 pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post-construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soil, or on structural fill up to 5 feet in thickness, will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one-quarter inch in a distance of 50 feet along a continuous footing. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or surrounded by level, structural fill. We recommend using the following design values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction ; 0.40 Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Where: (i) pct is pounds per cubic toot,and (ii) passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above design values. Augercast Concrete Piers Augercast piers are installed using continuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated sub- surface conditions. An allowable compressive capacity of 40 tons can be attained by Installing a 16-inch-diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into dense strata. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. We estimate that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live- loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structures should be less than about one-quarter inch. We recommend reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage ex- tending a portion of the pier's length with a full-length center bar. Each pier can be assumed to have a point of fixity at 12 feet below the ground surface for the computation of lateral load resis- tance. The piers that will support the downslope sides of Buildings 11, 13, and 15 should be Jun 17 98 03: 23p (425) 747-8561 p, 7 • Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June xx, 1998 Page 6 spaced no further than 3 feet edge-to-edge. These piers should be designed to cantilever to a depth of 10 feet, resisting a lateral active soil density of 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting over the pier spacing within the cantilever portion. This is intended to retain the near-surface soil be- neath these buildings in the event of future slope movement. pipe Piles As an alternative to augercast piers, 3- or 4-inch-diameter pipe piles can be used to support por- tions of the buildings that are underlain by deep fill. Pipe piles cannot be used for the downslope sides of Buildings 11, 13, and 15, where large lateral soil loads need to be resisted by the deep foundations. Pipe piles driven with a 650- or 800-pound jackhammer to the following final pene- tration rates may be assigned the following compressive capacities. -Pile Diameter Final Driving Rate Final Driving Rate Allowable Bearing Capacity (650-pound ham- (800-pound hammer) mer) 3 inches 12 sec/inch 10 sec/inch 6 tons 4 inches 20 seclinch 15 sench 10 tons Pile caps and grade beams may be used to transmit loads to the piles. Pile caps should include a minimum of two piles to reduce the potential for eccentric loads being applied to the piles. Welded, slip or threaded couplers should be used to connect subsequent pipe sections on piles that need to be extended in length. Due to their small diameter, the lateral capacity of vertical pipe piles is relatively small. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by passive earth pressure acting on the verti- cal, embedded portions of the foundation. For this condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or surrounded by level, structural fill. We recom- mend using a passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot for this resistance. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above design values. If additional lateral resistance is required, we recommend driving battered piles in the same direction as the applied lateral load. The lateral ca- pacity of a battered pile is equal to one-half of the lateral component of the allowable compressive load, up to a maximum allowable lateral capacity of one ton. The allowable vertical capacity of battered piles does not need to be reduced if the piles are battered steeper than 1:5 (Horizontal:Vertical). Seismic Considerations The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1994 UBC and the 1997 UBC, the native site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type S1 and Sc (Dense Soil); respectively. The loose, wet fill encountered in several of the borings is potentially liquefiable during a large earthquake. This hazard is mitigated by the use of deep foundations embedded into non- liquefiable soils to support the affected buildings. Jun 17 98 03: 24p (425) 747-8561 p. 8 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June xx, 1998 Page 7 Slabs-on-Grade Where undisturbed native soils are exposed, the building floors may be constructed as slabs-on- grade. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported, structural fill. Building floors that are underlain by loose fill or native soils should be supported on piers, either as structural slabs or as framed floors over a crawl space. All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining, structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed later in Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls. In areas where the passage of moisture through the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand should be used in the fine-grading process to reduce damage to the vapor barrier, to provide uniform support under the slab, and to reduce shrinkage cracking by improving the concrete cunng process. Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* i 40 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where: (i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(ii)active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. i For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height,a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level, structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads, such as vehicles, will be placed behind the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth 43 Jun 17 98 03: 24p (425) 747-8561 p . 9 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98'1 92 June xx, 1998 Page 8 pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Where the on- site silty sands, which are not free-draining, are used as wall backfill, at least 12 inches of free-draining gravel should be placed against the walls for proper drainage. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall arc not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the below-grade walls. If some seepage through the walls or moist conditions are not acceptable, waterproofing should be provided. This could include limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but it will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. Rockeries We anticipate that rockeries may be used in the site development. A rockery is not intended to function as an engineered structure to resist lateral earth pressures, as a retaining wall would do. The primary function of a rockery is to cover the exposed, excavated surface and thereby retard the erosion process. We recommend limiting rockeries to a height of 8 feet and placing them against only dense, competent, native soil. Where rockeries are constructed in front of - - compacted fill they should be limited to 5 feet in height. The lower two-thirds of each fill rockery should be constructed using 3- to 4-man rocks. Taller fill rockeries would require the use of geogrid reinforcement in the compacted backfill. The construction of rockeries is, to a large extent, an art not entirely controllable by engineering methods and standards. It is imperative that rockeries, if used, are constructed with care and in a proper manner by an experienced contractor with proven ability in rockery construction. The `TT Jun 17 98 03: 24p 14251747-8561 p. 10 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June xx, 1998 Page 9 rockeries should be constructed with hard, sound, durable rock in accordance with accepted local practice and standards. Soft rock, or rock with a significant number of fractures or inclusions, should not be used, in order to limit the amount of maintenance and repair needed over time. Provisions for maintenance, such as access to the rockery, should be considered in the design. In general, we recommend that rockeries have a minimum dimension of one-third the height of the slope cut above them. Given the existing soil conditions tiered rockeries are not recommended. Excavations and Slopes Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the existing fill and loose, native soils at the subject site would be classified as Type B. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height in these loose soils should not be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Excavation contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. All permanent cuts into native soil should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not be constructed with an inclination greater than 2:1 (H:V). To reduce the potential for shallow sloughing, fill must be compacted to the face of these slopes. This could be accomplished by overbuilding the compacted fill and then trimming it back to its final inclination. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. Also, all permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve the stability of the surficial layer of soil. Any disturbance to the existing steep slopes outside of the building limits may reduce the stability of the slope. Damage to the existing vegetation and ground should be minimized, and any disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Soil from the excavation should not be placed on the steep slopes, and this may require the off-site disposal of any surplus soil. Drainage Considerations We recommend•the use of footing drains at the base of perimeter footings and all backfilled, earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing, and it should be sloped for drainage. Drainage should also be provided -- inside the footprint of a structure, where (1) a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground surface, (2) an excavation encounters significant seepage, or (3) an excavation for a building will be close to the expected high groundwater elevations. We can 45 Jun 17 98 03: 25p (425) 747-8561 p. 11 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June xx, 1998 Page 10 provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 15. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. Groundwater was observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to (a ) building(s) should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Water from roof, storm water, and foundation drains should not be discharged onto slopes; it should be tightlined to a suitable outfall located away from any slopes. Pavement Areas As exhibited by the damaged existing pavements, the subgrade soils are subject to softening under repetitive traffic loads. To reduce the potential for this, we recommend that at least 9 inches of imported, gravelly structural fill be placed under all pavement sections in drive lanes or entrys, where the heaviest, most frequent loading is anticipated. The subgrade soils must be in a stable, non-yielding condition at the time of paving, or the placement of structural fill. Structural fill or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. We recommend using Supac 5NP, manufactured by Phillips Petroleum Company, or a non-woven fabric with equivalent strength and permeability characteristics. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, 12 inches of granular, structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lightly-loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily-loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily-loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. Some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. General Earthwork and Structural Fill 1) Jun 17 98 03: 25p (425) 747-8561 p. 12 • Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June xx, 1998 Page 11 All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. it is extremely important that the foundation(s) and slab(s) for the existing structures are also removed. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Location of Minimum Fill Placement Relative Compaction Beneath footings, slabs ; 95% or walkways . ................ Behind retaining walls 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements ; subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as dcternthi d in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78(Modified Proctor). • Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil encountered In the test borings is representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions 4-7 Jun 17 98 03: 26p (425) 747-8561 p. 13 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98'192 June xx, 1998 Page 12 frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. The recommendations presented in this report are directed toward the protection of only the proposed structures from damage due to slope movement. Predicting the effects of development on the stability of slopes is an inexact and imperfect science that is currently based mostly on the past behavior of slopes with similar characteristics. Landslides and soil movement can occur on steep slopes before, during, or after the development of property. The owner must ultimately accept the possibility that some slope movement could occur, resulting in possible loss of ground or damage to the facilities around the proposed building. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Trammel Crow Residential, and its representatives for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 14 Test Boring Logs Plate 15 Footing Drain Detail We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we - may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Jun 17 98 03: 26p (425) 747-8561 p. 14 Trammel Crow Residential JN 98192 June>oc, 1998 Page 13 Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate James R. Finley,,P.E. Principal MRM/JRF:alt • D • • \ , •.` `•\ :f •t • • / • — '�£s: :.1,`11• \• '1 • ,, • .• • �-s'` 1i L7.29 4.41• •'_` � .. . 'k• ' .� a I .1t � ipz-t46.p2• • • 4 ES, i i!` . 0 ....".....„40or ;. ; 41% ,‘,.......,...,..........,:.,i.,..... ..• is: ; );,..... ... 1 :.,,,,, „ \ t., t- .4.. i Del t o.00'09'31' ,• ,\ .is t •\. • ,v :,. \�< • \—.., l aarrr� — „n •• 1,,.1•',. \ ?� i t ` f,j p••� iji • • • 's•1%. • ,\C.\ g .,'i,!t:,1. ,r3.... '•,i,l%'•' le T •11 �`•,'•,\�s '•ti.s\•" ,y,,,�,, �` 'I1�-! :il 1.� llr. 1;1: ' - .,1 , • ••�• \ t s .s', \\,.,;, `.,',. lies \ .. ? •.1•1 1 ••`,'j .r.�f►r 1'\`` \ ,'• .\, - \tip `� ilk $ — 1 i ,\ % tt\'`,` ••\\ \ ` j, / '�' '11' %, '.‘‘' \` , \ \t A `\Z�'\ \ ./..,. I. 1 \' [• ,?,\.\ \ k 1• 1� ;r0o • •• .\ `:'.� ' `\.•\s ,,: .\•., • \, � \ �..\.\ r m.-Jjcto .`t't\`•\ ♦ „� fit\ Illl \\ •..�`•, It i\ 77D)1 .,\.\ ` '\\;.1 •,I\\ ��\ ? g •+ •, ! 1 } 1 1 \ \•\ ; 111 '••1' 9„ 1 ' Lc �r•`•\\`\,\ , ',`,:.•', .11 t�'.'}.�'1011� \: ,''.., N O.. { 1 1 1 1 1 1' '' 1 1 ' \ 1!, ., ,,t.;,. a6+ � • „\' � � ....1 \ `�\` .\ .11`.1\1;/ t . , In S, :: ,,�'`- =11�i i1 ; 1 It 1 � 1 11•11\�\11!I► 11 I \I, \•t 1 ,4 � ' 1``.'1 ` I • r - 1 1 1 1 ,1 ,,\ tl �tis 6 D \,•, tt.`,`'`, • 1,' � I)i; 't',..1 \ • 11 I' -• _l f) \,t 11•: .i it `\\;;o .11t;1• t', : ' t \:',;,�- \., I:tltl.- ''• -= I It\,\`.;.. 9.cco �• I i< ,• 1 1•\, ; d,•i1, \t1'� '\ •i,, 'ii.:;.1.i 11 .! • ,1 _ -_!• o►o►nsa000�000. \\ ` t�` It; .? -i .{1\ �'� ' ...",;':'N.-::Y......,\ 1 \•\'\.. 1 g \ `��\\ \11 \'\;;• 1, i� •'t'Irl .`l '.\ \ l,' .- i• �`\ \` \I`►11' •— 4 -""1- ©• 1 1i1,11�1•;.1 \ _ _� s A , '\ \I,''\\1 1. 4 1 -1. i \\l\itnl!il'• \tt\1t1\1'_=`_- '1 < ;�. 0 o c c o• \ , I 1,l' lt,l'1\I I VP �• , 1 \p••,.\. rt�s. r:"-• -`V J i _ s • o ` (I\ \ i1�`1 1 1 �\��.���_ :.: _ - '\ N\\I P tip • 1 �' ''''... \\*' \'‘.\*:‘... .'..2...:%b.:: - / ' `\\\\'11\\t .N69.1.\'44•w ; \\` q \\}tA / i..., / t. \\ ,``:d\a��\:,, 1, •.�. `.: \ \.' APARTMENT COMMUNITY FOR Rif 71 �-.. TRAMMELL� CROW RESIDENTIAL rma ,a_ TAMARON POINTE APARTMENTS VII. BASIN & COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS 5� VIII. OTHER PERMITS 52. IX. TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ANALYSIS & DESIGN X. BOND QUANTITES WORKSHEET, RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET & DECLARATION OF COVENANT 5¢ XI. MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MANUAL 5S Y TSI Transportation Solutions,Inc. 16310 NE 80th Street,Suite 100 Redmond,WA 980523861 (425)88.4134(800)2854134 FAX(425)867-0898 September 14, 1998 • Mr. Joseph Strobele Lincoln Property Company 1756 114th Avenue SE, Suite 135 Bellevue,WA 98004-6931 Subject: The Bluffs at Lake Washington Multi-family Development in Renton Dear Mr. Strobele: Thank you for asking Transportation Solutions,Inc. (TSI)to analyze the traffic issues azcociatcd with the proposed The Bluffs at Lake Washington multi-family development located in the City of Renton,Washington: This letter report provides you and the City of Rcntun with a summary of the project location and description; a brief development history that defines the scope of this analysis; a definition of the approved and proposed developments traffic characteristics, and a summary of findings and analysis. Project Description The project site is located between Lake Washington Boulevard and Interstate 405 (I-405), approximately one-quarter mile north of Park Avenue. The project site is located across Lake Washington Boulevard from the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. A map showing the location of the proposed project is shown on Attachment 1. The Bluffs is a proposed multi-family residential development consisting of 174 dwelling units and 311 parking spaces on three segments. Of the 174 dwelling units, 24 units will he town- house style and 150 units will be luxury low-rise apartments. Segments A and C will consist of 114 low-rise apartment units and 24 town-houses. Segment B would consist of 36 low-rise apartment units. The vehicular access to Segment A and C will be provided by a new driveway on Lake Washington Boulevard, approximately 1,000 feet south of the north access to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. This access is a dual-access with an emergency vehicle driveway ruiuiiliv. parallel to an access driveway. Two accesses are proposed to serve segment B; one would be located off of North 20`h Street approximately 400 feet east of the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard/North 20`" Street. The second access will be located off Lake Washington Boulevard North approximately 400 feet north of the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard North/North 20th Street. The second Mr. Joseph Strobele Page 2 September 14, 1998 access would serve as an emergency vehicle access. A representative site plan is shown on Attachment 2. Development History The project site was approved for development of 165 multi-family units on January 12, 1993. The approved project included an internal turn-around for emergency vehicles and a secondary emergency access road at the north end of the site. Because of the topography and the desire to reduce impacts to adjoining areas, the secondary access to the north end of the site was latter eliminated and a revised site plan was submitted to the City for approval. The revised site plan included a dual-access that would provide a public driveway as well as an emergency vehicle access running parallel to each other. This site plan was approved by the City of Renton Fire Department on July 29, 1997. The dual-access is also being proposed for this current proposed development. In addition, nine more apartment units are being proposed to be included in the development totaling 174 multi- family units. Internal site traffic circulation has been improved and was approved by the Renton Fire Department. Scope of Analysis TSI has scoped the traffic analysis with the City of Renton Traffic and Planning staffs. Based on their review, they are requiring an update to the 1989 traffic report for the previously approved development completed by The Transpo Group. This update traffic report includes a trip generation comparison between the approved and current proposed development, traffic assignment based on the trip distribution from the 1989 traffic report, and level of service analysis for the intersections of Park Avenue North/Lake Washington Boulevard North and Burnett Avenue North/Lake Washington Boulevard North. Trip Generation As mentioned above,the project site was approved for development of 165 apartment units (Land Use- 220). Based on the 1989 traffic report for the approved development,the approved project would generate approximately 123 PM peak hour trips ( 84 entering and 39 exiting). Based on the latest ITE Trip Generation Report, 6"'Edition,the current proposed development with 150 low-rise apartment(Land Use-221) and 24 town-house units (Land Use-230)would generate approximately 1,350 daily trips and 114 PM peak hour trips. Table 1 presents a trip generation comparison between the approved and current proposed development for the project site. The peak hour traffic volume is reduced despite an increase in the number of dwelling units because the current project represents a more refined mix of residential uses that generate a lower number of trips per dwelling unit. TS Transportation Solutions Mr. Joseph Strobele Page 3 September 14, 1998 Table 1. Trip Generation Comparison Number PM Peak Hour of Units • Entering Exiting Approved Development Apartment 165 84 39 Current Proposed Development Low-Rise Apartment 150 63 32 Town-house 24 13 6 Sub-total 76 38 Net Change +9 -8 -1 The current proposed development will generate approximately 9 fewer vehicles per hour(vph) in the PM peak than the approved development. The time at which project generated traffic would have the greatest impact on the road system is during the PM peak hour. During this hour, the combination of commute and commercial traffic are concentrated and highest. The current proposed development will have less traffic impact during the PM peak hour than the previously approved development. Trip Distribution and Assignment Based on the City of Renton historical traffic volume data from 1990 to 1997, there was an 8% decrease in traffic volume from 1991 to 1995. This was due to the relocation of the Boeing Assembly Plants. However, since 1996, traffic has been growing at approximately 3% annually. Thus, existing traffic was increased at a rate of 3% compounded annually for two year to forecast the year 2000 background traffic volume. This growth reflects additional traffic volumes due to anticipated new pipeline developments in the project vicinity. In addition, the proposed Tamaron Pointe Apartments and Labrador Venture Plat Single-family developments traffic were added to the background traffic to estimate year 2000 traffic volume without the proposed project. This provides a"worse case" scenario for forecasting future traffic "without"the project. Attachment 3 and 4 shows the traffic volumes for existing and future condition"without" the proposed project. As requested by City of Renton Staff, the project trip distribution percentage from the 1989 traffic impact report for the project site was used for this analysis. The trip distribution percentage is presented in Attachment 5. Project trips were assigned to the street system by multiplying the percentage trip distribution on the streets by the gross trip generation of the current proposed development The project trip assignment is presented in Attachment 6. TS Transportation Solutions Mr. Joseph Strobele Page 4 September 14, 1998 • To forecast traffic volume"with"the project, the proposed project generated traffic was added onto the 2000 background traffic volume. Attachment 7 shows the traffic assignment for future year 2000 condition"with"project. Level of Services Level of service analysis for the intersections of Park Avenue North/Lake Washington Boulevard and Burnett Avenue North/Lake Washington Boulevard North were computed for existing,year 2000"without"the proposed project, and year 2000"with"the proposed project conditions. These two intersections were considered reflective of conditions in the area and were selected because they would experience the largest project generated traffic volume. The Highway • Capacity Manual methodology was used to calculate level of service. The level of service result is presented in Table 2 and level of service worksheets are included in Attachment 8 Table 2. Level of Service Summary Intersection Existing Future without i Future with 1998 project Project Park Avenue N/Lake Washington B(14.8) C(15.5) C(15.8) Blvd Lake Washington Blvd/South Project N/A N/A A(0 4) Driveway Lake Washington Blvd/North 206' A(0.4) A(0.4) A(0.6) Street Lake Washington Blvd/Bumett A(3.5) A(4 7) A(5.4) Avenue N Based on 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Methodology N/A—intersection does not exist The level of service at Lake Washington Boulevard/Burnett Avenue North is calculated to operate at LOS•A for all three conditions. This is an excellent level of service. The project traffic contributes a negligible impact to this intersection. The level of service at Park Avenue North/Lake Washington Boulevard is calculated to operate at LOS-C with the project's traffic. LOS-C is a good level of service. Traffic volume at this intersection will increase by less than three percent with the project Thus, the proposed project will have negligible traffic impact to the surrounding roadway network. In addition, TSI examined the level of service at the two outlets onto Lake Washington Boulevard North. Both of these intersections are forecasted to operate at an excellent level of service(LOS-A). Conclusion This project will have negligible traffic impact to the surrounding roadway network. Affected intersections are expected to operate at a good level of service, LOS-C or above. Proposed TS Transportation Solutions Mr. Joseph Strobele Page 5 September 14, 1998 emergency accesses have been reviewed and approved by the Renton Fire Department and will provide safe alternative accesses into the project site. All project driveways are forecasted to operate at a very good level of service, LOS-A. Mitigation The increase in traffic volumes due to the proposed development would not significantly worsen the level of service at Park Avenue North/Lake Washington Boulevard North or Lake Washington Boulevard/Burnett Avenue North. Thus, no specific improvement at this intersection is needed to mitigate traffic impacts from the project. Analysis of site access shows that no other specific traffic mitigation is warranted. I hope this traffic report provides you with the necessary information to submit to the City for approval. If you have any questions or need clarification, please call me at your convenience. It was a pleasure working with you on this project. Sincerely, Transportation Solutions, Inc. Thang Tat Nguyen Transportation Engineer Attachments TS r z' tl 4a e `a Z z y ai i m a 3 d cl m N.30th St. N.28th St. NE 27th St. z a v m a) N.24t�� i,� I p, _ 1-5 H i rQ„ ,, 7 • � ei t, �i I. "ter. r Cr NE Park Dr C) N a1°t P �� a 9� m z co •2 d < 2 to a Attachment 1 The Bluffs MIVicinity Map Multi-Family Transportation Soluootu,Inc. Page r 1 1\\ \ \\ Lj i 11 il ,. :/Th I / _,C\,:tly711 utV r'i . ' j :\s‘.\‘‘,..1.---- \ -'1.1 • ii•-•:---::-:i -Z---: -Z:::::'N— A,• ‘ �,� simi�N! , 1 ,,,,,: \..‘10,,:, 01_,,,,,,‘ , ,‘,. 6 \ ,, '1 ,'lli 1111' V —11 ,1 ,,,„„,,. ..—,/ -- ' 11 �(11 I 1)7") ,.i11si; lii IV.c: LI:. I II a / I I n 11, 11,. �`y�o g 111/ ///f-C = 1 J1 �o ��\ :4\ ,zil``II trl I `�4. c�r����`G �Il \�11•�a'ta \A \ f' //1 I<4 Cif-r/inill 0 i II '; 1 \ \\ \.,, 1'III /1�/ . \ I 1//lii/�/ / - ii� I ` , %u/4/ 1 }'W `' i‘olrr! �'� C . 1 \: na l l 1 al 10 1�-A , C' i 1 II �p .r. �`. \'•\ : i t .w. •, i 1, Ill :.? �,a„I ' \`' I `,_ `\ 1 . \1 • '.\,.. \-A. -7z%ie,77 owt--\1 ri,,,;..... 1 4110 \\ ‘ ‘044 ummaltIr. 1 1 ' 'it04)36%-7170; II �14 ; ' I 1 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -SUBJECT TO REGULATORY REVIEW Figure 2 The Bluffs TS! Site Plan Multi-Family f ransp)rtatian Solutions.Inc Page 7 1 r 40 i. Z Amy s > a a� I I• ^ m m a Existing V�p� v N.30th St 10 . 0 +----54 tit. N.28th St. CO N • r NE 27th St {.11 tgi 0 c CO .) 5 a \ N.24th St. LQ0 --10 i-19 /''' -.` ;:.• ' ``_ 4 5 ;r t o dm 1 LA d PY ,9 0 ,--0 ucO ,. (^ is 0 ems_ 8° f "d / 2 us \ NE Pane Dr. 900 .3 b4 N•Pa I. 14'° 14\lir. 258— ' 114 860—D 4 -482 �-"""' 0� d y \ N ri 774 -------------- �, O` t ai> St. CI 2 a y t n. TS/ Attachment 3 The Bluffs Existing 1998 PM Peak Traffic Multi-Family Volumes Transportanon Solutions,Inc. Page 8 r • a• m oF oa • r ' > m" a Q N RI � \ 0 E b �4 m a Future N.30th St Background 010 i---76 1 r/---- N.28th St •-..., NE 27th St. ¢' TO 3 0 v m d c.,N N.24th St. W �Q-11 7i--20 I O cot. m .IIN.OI_ v ^ N� 1 O / Q / I^ aI \ Qapc• ;lark Dr. 900 a� bA N 296-4 ® L14a 0—RI, S.\ t,s; r---.....----...... N m 2 d a y a Attachment 4 The Bluffs Future 2000 PM Peak Traffic Volumes Multi-Family without Project Transportation Solutions,Inc. Pace 9 1 2 tea• 24% i i 10% r 4fi m a �' m Trip N.3Oth St. Distribution N.28th St. NE 27th St i m a' Wil I N.24th St. 34 Y.. ,to, { , ':,.. s � ru"t1 4% 66% rcrz4% s 30% t gip 28% a Attachment 5 The Bluffs Project Traffic Distribution Multi-Family Transportation Soiutions.Inc. Page 10 k 2 aC �Cam' �mg cii i \ 0 L �� c2 TripN.3oth sc. Assignment Ank 4-a 1 rrs'...... N.28th St. %•••,......... NE 27th St a i IV 0 a a9m lco IO \ N.24th St. Ark�DQ--3 4-6 ts „, os,. ,,, ,. „..„.0 t''''''4 . --______,,,, „ bo� N1 mcs. ® to �co . R ir/ , ,,. . , z .,.., •_ ,-,, , , , ,, A / ,,, ,,,: \ NE Park Dr. 900 N.Pat*pc ,T a b 0--iti. CO 43-0 .----------- \ r/- Q s , 7,. , 6, s. Izgy ai 1- 1 Q R a Attachment 6 The Bluffs FSIProject Traffic Assignment Multi-Family Transportauun Solutions.Inc Page 11 2' ,a• m oc -," dt..1 r N n \ m0 m d 1� Future 1 Ali N.30th St. with Project 0 # . NW ‘&—.93 4 N r / N.28th St •-„,„ NE 27th St. . Q 3 0 v to m cn N N I \ N.24th St. CIO`D —14 �26 1 . ---.,...,. v N ZD�St d 2;0 \IL d e 3 NW ‘—.19 ---..-........... tr/ .....................,.. , ....,„ ,. . / Im °Ir' /^� Pa 4� �D c\L01 .„,,,„ T N 317� L 173 912—C. � .0—511 ~ (� a \ 't.ii 7---- --......I 7 0 N %Ey ai Q 1- d ea liS1 Figure 7 The Bluffs Future 2000 PM Peak Traffic Multi-Family Volumes with Project Transportation Solutions,Inc Page 12 Figure 8 The Bluffs TSILevel of Service Worksheets Multi-Family Transportation Solutions.Inc I. Park Ave. N. & Lake Washington Blvd. N. . 6/15/1998 1998 Existing 9/14/1998 Lanes,Volumes,Timings o © oa000 ® a © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WU Ma WBR NBI, NBT NBR SBL 513j SBR Lane Configurations /I fti ft r rrr ' r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 • Grade (%) 0% -5% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 50 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds No No No No Frt Protected 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 5644 0 0 3710 1577 0 0 4797 1805 0 1615 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 FIt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.952 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 5644 0 0 3710 1577 0 0 4797 1809 0 1615 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 258 860 0 0 482 114 0 0 522 65 0 156 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.81 Growth Factor 100% 100% 90% 100% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 266 887 0 0 536 95 0 0 652 80 0 173 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 266 976 0 0 563 95 0 0 822 80 0 173 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Free Perm Perm Perm Pm+Ov Phase Number 7 4 8 1 6 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split (s) 31 59 28 46 46 Maximum Split (%) 30% 56% 27% 44% 44% Minimum Split (s) 8 20 20 20 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.27 0.53 0.24 1.00 0.41 0.41 0.68 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 477 3010 883 1577 1964 741 1092 V/C Ratio 0.56 0.32 0.64 0.06 0.42 0.11 0.16 V/S Ratio Prot 0.15 0.04 V/S Ratio Perm 0.17 0.15 0.06 0.17 0.04 0.07 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 25.2 10.5 27.3 0.0 16.8 14.5 3.9 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.69 0.45 Incr. Delay, d2 1.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 26.3 10.5 28.4 0.0 42 11.7 10.1 42 1.8 LOS D B D A 4 B B 4 A Maximum Green (s) 27 55 24 3.0 3.0 PM Peak Synchro Report JMB Page 1 TRANSP-R300 r t Park Ave. N. & Lake Washington Blvd. N. 6/15/1998 1998 Existing 9/14/1998 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 1E1 LJ Eooaoa Lane Group EBB EBT EBR WBL BT WBR NAL NBT NBR SBI, SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 3.0 3.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 None Coord Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 5 5 Recall Mode None None None 11 11 Walk Time (s) 5 5 0 0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 42 42 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Coord Coord 90th %ile Green (s) 27 55 24 46 46 90th %Ile Term Code Max Hold Max Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 23 51 24 52 52 70th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 20 45 21 57 57 50th %Ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Coord Coord 30th %Ile Green (s) 18 40 18 64 64 30th %Ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 13 33 16 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 169 145 178 0 105 27 29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 239 143 227 0 139 56 50 Link Length (ft) 3034 3041 50th Up Block Time % 95th Up Block Time % Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50 50th Bay Block Time % 58% 39% 59% 95th Bay Block Time % 59% 32% 61% Queuing Penalty (veh) ,190 95 57 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Natural Cycle: 60 Offset: 32 (30%), Referenced to phase 2-Unused and 6-SBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.47 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 14.8 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Park Ave. N. &Lake Washington Blvd. N. 46 + 59 46 31 28 �6 1' ,7 F 8 PM Peak Synchro Report JMB Page 2 TRaNSP-R300 Park Ave. N. & Lake Washington Blvd. N. 6/15/1998 2000 Future without Project 9/14/1998 Lanes,Volumes,Timings a © 0000aoa LEI oo Lane Group ail ail EBR WBL WBT WBR NJ. NBT N E 5i_3L SBT SBR Lane Configurations li +ft ft r rrr ti r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 • Grade (%) 0% -5% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 50 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds No No No No Frt Protected 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 1787 5644 0 0 3710 1577 0 0 4797 1805 0 1615 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.952 Satd. Flow(perm) 1787 5644 0 0 3710 1577 0 0 4797 1809 0 1615 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 296 912 0 0 511 143 0 0 554 80 0 178 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.81 Growth Factor 100% 100% 90% 100% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 305 940 0 0 568 119 0 0 692 99 0 198 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow(vph) 305 1034 0 0 596 119 0 0 872 99 0 198 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Free Perm Perm Perm Pm+Ov Phase Number 7 4 8 1 6 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split (s) 31 59 28 46 46 Maximum Split (%) 30% 56% 27% 44% 44% Minimum Split (s) 8 20 20 20 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.27 0.53 0.24 1.00 0.41 0.41 0.68 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 477 3010 883 1577 1964 741 1092 V/C Ratio 0.64 0.34 0.67 0.08 0.44 0.13 0.18 V/S Ratio Prot 0.17 0.05 V/S Ratio Perm 0.18 0.16 0.08 0.18 0.05 0.07 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 25.9 10.6 27.6 0.0 17.0 14.7 4.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.58 Incr. Delay, d2 2.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 27.9 10.7 29.0 0.0 42 13.3 11.4 42 2.3 LOS D B D A 4 BB 4 A Maximum Green (s) 27 55 24 3.0 3.0 PM Peak Synchro Report ITN Page 1 TRANSP-R300 Park Ave. N. & Lake Washington Blvd. N. 6/15/1998 2000 Future without Project 9/14/1998 Lanes,Volumes,Timings o © LI CI oaoa Lane Group FHB EBT EBi' WBL WBT WBR 1�T MLR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 3.0 3.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 None Coord Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 5 5 Recall Mode None None None 11 11 Walk Time (s) 5 5 0 0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11 11 42 42 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Coord Coord 90th %ile Green (s) 27 55 24 44 44 90th %ile Term Code Max Hold Max Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 25 53 24 49 49 70th %Ile Term Code Gap Hold Max Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 22 48 21 54 54 50th %Ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 19 43 19 62 62 30th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 15 36 16 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 193 147 189 0 120 35 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) 276 153 241 0 148 67 57 Link Length (ft) 3034 3041 50th Up Block Time % 95th Up Block Time% Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50 50th Bay Block Time % 59% 37% 60% 95th Bay Block Time % 61% 33% 62% Queuing Penalty (veh) 206 107 72 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Natural Cycle: 65 Offset: 32 (30%), Referenced to phase 2-Unused and 6-SBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.51 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 15.5 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: Park Ave. N. &Lake Washington Blvd. N. J1 4 46 59 46 31 28 jj 6 LA 7 E—I 8 PM Peak Synchro Report TIN Page 2 TRANSP-R300 . Park Ave. N. & Lake Washington Blvd. N. 6/15/1998 2000 Future with Project 9/15/1998 Lanes,Volumes,Timings a © 0000aoa © ao Lane Group EBL BT. WBL WBT WBR NI. NBT ttag sm. si_31 SBR Lane Configurations ii ftt ft r err vi r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% -5% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 50 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds No No No No Frt Protected 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 5644 0 0 3710 1577 0 0 4797 1805 0 1615 Frt Perm. 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.952 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 5644 0 0 3710 1577 0 0 4797 1809 0 1615 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 317 912 0 0 511 173 0 0 554 97 0 186 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.81 Growth Factor 100% 100% 90% 100% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 327 940 0 0 568 144 0 0 692 120 0 207 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Flow (vph) 327 1034 0 0 596 144 0 0 872 120 0 207 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Free Perm Perm Perm Pm+Ov Phase Number 7 4 8 1 6 Phase Lagging? Lead Lag Can Lead or Lag? Maximum Split (s) 31 59 28 46 46 Maximum Split ((%) 30% 56% 27% 44% 44% Minimum Split (s) 8 20 20 20 20 Yellow Time (s) 4 4 4 4 4 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.27 0.53 0.24 1.00 0.41 0.41 0.68 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 477 3010 883 1577 1964 741 1092 V/C Ratio 0.69 0.34 0.67 0.09 0.44 0.16 0.19 V/S Ratio Prot 0.18 0.05 V/S Ratio Perm 0.18 0.16 0.09 0.18 0.07 0.08 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 26.3 10.6 27.6 0.0 17.0 14.9 4.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.65 Incr. Delay, d2 2.8 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 29.1 10.7 29.0 0.0 42 14.0 12.2 42 2.6 LOS D B D A 4 BB 4 A Maximum Green (s) 27 55 24 3.0 3.0 PM Peak(PM2000w.sy5)w/Tamaron and Labrador Synchro Report 1"1N Page 1 TRANSP-R300 Park Ave. N. & Lake Washington Blvd. N. 6/15/1998 2000 Future with Project 9/15/1998 Lanes,Volumes,Timings 0 © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LLUJ Lane Group EBB E_3I EBR WBL, WBT WBR NM. NBT NM SBI, 5ai SBR Minimum Initial (s) 4 4 4 3.0 3.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0 0 0 None Coord Time To Reduce (s) 0 0 0 5 5 Recall Mode None None None 11 11 Walk Time (s) 5 5 0 0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 11 42 42 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Coord Coord 90th %Ile Green (s) 27 55 24 42 42 90th %ile Term Code Max Hold Max Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 27 55 24 48 48 70th %Ile Term Code Max Hold Max Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 24 49 21 53 53 50th %Ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 20 44 19 60 60 30th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Coord Coord 10th %Ile Green (s) 16 36 16 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 206 143 189 0 123 45 37 Queue Length 95th (ft) 297 153 241 0 148 79 59 Link Length (ft) 3034 3041 50th Up Block Time % 95th Up Block Time % Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50 50th Bay Block Time % 59% 36% 60% 95th Bay Block Time % 62% 33% 62% Queuing Penalty(veh) 208 113 87 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 105 Natural Cycle: 65 Offset: 32 (30%), Referenced to phase 2-Unused and 6-SBT, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.53 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.57 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 15.8 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: Park Ave. N. & Lake Washington Blvd. N. J1 �4 46 59 46 31 28 _, 6 _1. I7 f- 8 PM Peak(PM2000w.sy5)w/Tamaron and Labrador Synchro Report TTN Page 2 TRANSP-R300 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 04PM98X.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Burnett Ave N (E-W) Lake Washington Blvd Analyst ttn Date of Analysis 9/14/98 Other Information existing 1998 conditions All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 0 0 1 < 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0 Volumes 3 171 128 72 54 0 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB . WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 3 0 57 RT Flow Rate 0 76 0 Approach Flow Rate 183 211 57 Proportion LT 0 . 02 0 . 00 1 . 00 Proportion RT 0 . 00 0 .36 0 . 00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 211 183 0 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 57 57 394 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0 .41 0 .47 0 . 13 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 .47 0 .41 0 . 00 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 0 LT, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RT, Opposing Approach 76 0 0 LT, Conflicting Approaches 57 57 3 RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 0 76 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0 . 00 0 . 02 0 . 00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0 . 36 0 . 00 0 . 00 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 01 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 19 Approach Capacity 605 547 382 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 183 605 0 . 30 3 . 2 A WB 211 547 0 . 39 4 . 3 A SB 57 382 0 . 15 1 . 8 A Intersection Delay = 3 . 5 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 04PMOOWO.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Burnett Ave N (E-W) Lake Washington Blvd Analyst ttn Date of Analysis 9/14/98 Other Information 2000 background w/o project All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 0 0 1 < 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0 Volumes 3 196 164 79 76 0 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 3 0 80 RT Flow Rate 0 83 0 Approach Flow Rate 209 256 80 Proportion LT 0 . 01 0 . 00 1 . 00 Proportion RT 0 . 00 0 .32 0 . 00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 256 209 0 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 80 80 465 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0 . 38 0 .47 0 . 15 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 .47 0 . 38 0 . 00 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 0 LT, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RT, Opposing Approach 83 0 0 LT, Conflicting Approaches 80 80 3 RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 0 83 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0 . 00 0 . 01 0 . 00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0 . 32 0 . 00 0 . 00 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 01 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 18 Approach Capacity 577 534 398 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 209 577 0 . 36 4 . 0 A WB 256 534 0 .48 6 .2 B SB 80 398 0 . 20 2 . 1 A Intersection Delay = 4 . 7 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 04PMOOW.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Burnett Ave N (E-W) Lake Washington Blvd Analyst ttn Date of Analysis 9/14/98 Other Information 2000 w/ project All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 0 0 1 < 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0 Volumes 3 213 172 84 93 0 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 3 0 98 RT Flow Rate 0 88 0 Approach Flow Rate 227 269 98 Proportion LT 0 . 01 0 . 00 1 . 00 Proportion RT 0 . 00 0 . 33 0 . 00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 269 227 0 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 98 98 496 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0 . 38 0 .45 0 . 16 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 .45 0 . 38 0 . 00 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 0 LT, Opposing Approach 0 3 0 RT, Opposing Approach 88 0 0 LT, Conflicting Approaches 98 98 3 RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 0 88 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0 . 00 0 . 01 0 . 00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0 . 33 0 . 00 0 . 00 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 01 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 18 Approach Capacity 565 516 416 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 227 565 0 .40 4 . 6 A WE 269 516 0 . 52 7 . 3 B SB 98 416 0 . 24 2 .4 A Intersection Delay = 5 . 4 Level of Service (Intersection) = B HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1e 02PM98EX.HCO Page 1 TSI - Transportation Solutions, Inc. 16310 NE 80th St . Suite 100 Redmond, WA 98052- Ph: (425) 883-4134 Streets : (N-S) Lake Wa. Blvd. N. (E-W) N. 20th St . Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst JMB Date of Analysis 6/15/98 Other Information 1998 Existing, PM Peak Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 372 37 19 221 19 10 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 MC ' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE ' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 40 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1e 02PM98EX.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 412 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 856 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 856 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 431 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1068 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1068 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 664 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 437 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 428 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 22 428 8 . 9 0 . 0 B 7 . 3 WB R 12 856 4 . 3 0 . 0 A SB L 22 1068 3 .4 0 . 0 A 0 . 3 Intersection Delay = 0 .4 sec/veh • HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 02PM98WO.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Lake Wa. Blvd. N. (E-W) N. 20th St . Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst ttn Date of Analysis 6/15/98 Other Information 2000 WITHOUT PROJECT, PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 439 39 20 255 20 11 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE ' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 02PM98WO.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 482 Potential Capacity: (pcph) . 789 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 789 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 503 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 987 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 987 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 772 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 378 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 369 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 23 369 10 . 4 0 . 1 C 8 .4 WB R 13 789 4 . 6 0 . 0 A SE L 23 987 3 . 7 0 . 0 A 0 . 3 Intersection Delay = 0 .4 sec/veh HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 02PM98W.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Lake Wa. Blvd. N. (E-W) N. 20th St . Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst ttn Date of Analysis 6/15/98 Other Information 2000 WITH PROJECT, PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 449 51 26 274 26 14 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 MC ' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE ' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 02PM98W.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 500 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 773 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 773 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 527 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 962 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 962 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 97 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 815 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 357 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 346 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 30 346 11 .4 0 . 2 C 9 . 1 WB R 17 773 4 . 8 0 . 0 A SB L 30 962 3 . 9 0 . 0 A 0 . 3 Intersection Delay = 0 . 6 sec/veh HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 03PM98W.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Lake Wa. Blvd. N. (E-W) SOUTH DRIVEWAY Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed. . . 15 (min) Analyst ttn Date of Analysis 6/15/98 Other Information 2000 WITH PROJECT, PM PEAK Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 < 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 490 39 19 282 19 10 PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE ' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g 03PM98W.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 536 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 741 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 741 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 557 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 930 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 930 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WE EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 854 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 339 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 331 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 22 331 > 411 9 . 5 0 . 2 B 9 . 5 WB R 12 741. > SB L 22 930 4 . 0 0 . 0 A 0 .3 Intersection Delay = 0 . 4 sec/veh Ss N: I I Traffic Impact Analysis for Labrador Subdivision TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Renton, Washington • a dirisinn of TCN,Inc. 1607 E. Main St Auburn, WA 98002 Prepared For: Labrador Ventures At the Request of: City of Renton Prepared by: Timothy Miller, P.E., Washington#27048 Member, ITE #11026 September, 1998 Ph (253) 931-0506 Fax (253) 939-6938 tmiller@tcninc.com www.tcninc.com TABLE OF CONTENTS • Page • Introduction 2 I. Project Identification, Street Inventory, Safety 3 II. Trip Generation 3 III. Traffic Assignment 4 IV. Level of Service 5 V. Site Access 6 vv. Mitigation 7 Figures 9 Appendix 16 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1: PM Peak Hour Trip Generation 4 Table 2: Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria 5 Table 3: Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Summary 6 Table 4: Intersection Entering Sight Distance Measurements 7 Table 5: Site Generated Trip Percentage of Total Trips 7 • Figure 1: Project Vicinity 10 Figure 2: Site Plan 11 Figure 3: 1999 PM Peak Hour w/o Project, w/o Pipeline Projects 12 Figure 4: 1999 PM Peak Hour w/o Project, w/Pipeline Projects 13 Figure 5: Site Generated PM Peak Hour Trips 14 Figure 6: 1999 PM Peak Hour w/Project 15 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page TABLE OF CONTENTS Pae Introduction 2 I. Project Identification, Street Inventory, Safety 3 II. Trip Generation 3 III. Traffic Assignment 4 IV. Level of Service 5 V. Site Access 6 VI. Mitigation 7 Figures 9 Appendix 16 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1: PM Peak Hour Trip Generation 4 Table 2: Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria 5 Table 3: Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Summary 6 Table 4: Intersection Entering Sight Distance Measurements 7 Table 5: Site Generated Trip Percentage of Total Trips 7 Figure 1: Project Vicinity 10 Figure 2: Site Plan 11 Figure 3: 1999 PM Peak Hour w/o Project, w/o Pipeline Projects 12 Figure 4: 1999 PM Peak Hour w/o Project, w/Pipeline Projects 13 Figure 5: Site Generated PM Peak Hour Trips 14 Figure 6: 1999 PM Peak Hour w/Project 15 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 1 Labrador Subdivision TIA September 15, 1998 Introduction This report analyzes the traffic impact of the proposed Labrador Subdivision project located in North Renton generally bounded by Burnett Avenue N, Meadow Avenue N,N 28th Street and N 26'h Street. • According to the site plan, the proposed development includes 63 single family lots. Access will be provided via an internal street that links Burnett Avenue N to N 26`h Street. Study Area The City requested a level of service(LOS) analysis of two intersections and TCN elected to add another for a total of three intersections. HCS 2.4d computer software was used to perform the LOS analyses. This software was developed by the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) for this purpose and is accepted by the City. The intersections to be analyzed for LOS are: • Burnett Avenue N &N 30th Street • Burnett Avenue N&N 27th Street(New Subdivision Road) • Burnett Avenue N & Lake Washington Boulevard N • Existing Conditions Without Project An inventory of the street and intersections characteristics in the project vicinity was performed. A PM peak hour turning movement count at the intersections was conducted. In addition, TCN gathered existing traffic volume data from the City. Future Conditions Without Project The existing 1998 traffic volumes were adjusted by an annual traffic growth factor to account for general background growth. The horizon year for this analysis will be 1999 (1 year). The projected 1999 volumes were then increased by the traffic volumes from previously approved"pipeline"projects in the area that have not yet been constructed. This will ensure the traffic impacts of these other developments will be included in the existing condition. The two pipeline projects identified by the City for this analysis are: • The Bluffs • Tameron Pointe Apartments PM peak hour-Level of Service(LOS) analysis at the study area intersection was completed for the future conditions without project condition. Future Conditions With Project The following items were evaluated: • Trip generation, distribution and assignment were developed. ITE Land Use Code 210, Single Family Residential, was selected as the best representation of the proposed project. • LOS analysis at the study area intersections were calculated. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 2 Labrador Subdivision TIA September 15, 1998 Site access requirements and improvement needs were analyzed. Entering sight distance • measurements were gathered for the site intersection with Burnett Avenue N. Measures to mitigate the development's impact on the transportation facilities in the study area were developed, as required. I. Project Identification, Street Inventory Project Identification The proposed Labrador Subdivision includes 63 single family lots. The development is located in north Renton as shown in Figure 1, Site Vicinity. Recent and historical average traffic volume data for streets in the generate area are also shown in Figure 1. The project is generally bounded by Burnett Avenue N,Meadow Avenue N,N 28`h Street and N 26`h Street. Site access will be provided via an internal street(N 27`h Street) that links Burnett Avenue N to N 26`h Street. As shown on the site plan (Figure 2), the development will have an internal road system that accesses Burnett Avenue N and N 26`h Street. This internal road will also have two cul-de-sacs to provide access for the interior lots. In addition,up to four of the subdivision lots will access directly off of N 26th Street. Additionally,the existing"alley"marked as N 28`h Street which runs along the north boundary of the site will be retained in it's existing alignment with the exception of the western terminus with Burnett Avenue N. The alley will be curved to intersect the new subdivision street just east of Burnett Avenue N. Alley access to Burnett Avenue N will therefore be via the new subdivision street. Street Inventory Lake Washington Boulevard N is a two lane Secondary Arterial with bike lanes striped on the shoulders. It has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. It provides access through the site vicinity and provides access from downtown Renton. Burnett Avenue N is a two lane N-S Collector Arterial that links the neighborhood in the project vicinity to Lake Washington Boulevard N and to I-405 via N 30`h Street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. N 30`h Street is a two lane E-W Secondary Arterial that links the neighborhood in the project vicinity to I-405. It has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. II. Trip Generation Trip generation for the site is estimated using data from the sixth edition of Trip Generation. This report is published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) compiling measured trip generation data from different land use types from locations in the US. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 3 Labrador Subdivision TIA September 15, 1998 ITE Land Use Code 210 (Single Family Residential)using DU as the independent variable was • selected as the appropriate method of determining trip generation. A copy of the relevant page from Trip Generation is included in the Appendix. As shown in Table 1,the project will generate 64 PM peak hour trips, 41 entering and 23 exiting trips. • Table 1 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation PM Pk lir Entering Exiting DU 63 Directional Distribution 1000 64?o 36% Rate: 1.01 (LU 210) Trips 6-1 41 23 Notes: Italic Items Calculated from Inputs III. Traffic Assignment Traffic Volume Data 1998 weekday PM peak hour intersection turning movement data was gathered by TCN. The existing 1998 traffic volumes were adjusted by an annual traffic growth factor to account for general background growth.The horizon year for this analysis will be 1999 (1 year)using a 4% annual background growth rate. Figure 3 shows the resulting adjusted 1999 PM Peak Hour turning movements at the two existing study intersections. The projected 1999 volumes were then increased by the traffic volumes from previously approved"pipeline"projects in the area that have not yet been constructed. This will ensure the traffic impacts of these other developments will be included in the existing condition. Traffic volumes projected to be generated by the Tameron Pointe Apartments and The Bluffs projects were extracted from the traffic impact analyses prepared for these projects. Traffic volumes from The Bluffs project were increased 5% since the project is being reconfigured to have 5%more dwelling units that originally proposed. Figure 4 shows the 1999 PM Peak Hour w/o Project turning movements, including trips projected from these"pipeline"projects. New trips generated by the site were distributed in accordance with existing traffic patterns, trip generation of the adjacent Tameron Pointe project and the street system configuration. The site • generated trip % assignments are shown in Figure 5 along with PM peak hour site generated trip assignments.Note that about one third of the site generated trips (only 15% of total trips) that were destined for the I-405 interchange are projected to use the eastern site access via the 26th/Meadow/Park route to access N 30th Street. This distribution was determined using an equal travel distance method. Note that the analysis does not take into account the trips that will likely be diverted from the 26th /Meadow area east of the project. Residents in this area will likely find it convenient to travel TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 4 Labrador Subdivision TIA September 15, 1998 through the new development to gain a more direct access to Burnett Avenue N. In effect, such • diversions will tend lower traffic volumes on Meadow and on 28`h Place. Finally the site generated trips were added to the 1999 w/o Project data to establish the 1999 PM Peak Hour w/Project data shown in Figure 6. IV. Level of Service Capacity computations of the intersection were performed using the Highway Capacity Software package (HCS) Release 2.4d. This set of computer programs was developed by the Federal Highway Administration as an accurate representation of the Special Report 209 "Highway Capacity Manual" methodologies. Outputs from the program are included in the Appendix. Level of Service(LOS) was calculated for each of the study area intersections noted above. For the case of unsignalized intersections, the LOS of the stop controlled movements and left turn movements are calculated. The delay value established for each LOS criteria is listed in Table 2. Table 2 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria Delay per Vehicle Level of Expected Delay to (sec.) Service Minor Street Traffic 5.0 A Little or no delay 5.1 to 10.0 B Short traffic delays 10.1 to 20.0 C Average traffic delays 20.1 to 30.0 D Long traffic delays 30.1 to 45.0 E Very long traffic delays >45.0 F Extreme delays and queuing The results of the unsignalized intersection analyses are summarized in Table 3. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 5 • Labrador Subdivision TIA September 15, 1998 Table 3 1999 PM Peak Hour Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Summary WBLR SBL Burnett Avenue N & New Subdivision Street LOS Delay LOS Delay WB STOP Control (A-F) (Sec.) (A-F) (Sec.) w/o Project n/a n/a n/a n/a w/Project A 4.1 A 0.4 EB WB NB SB Burnett Avenue N & Lk Washington Boulevard N LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay All Way STOP Control (A-F) (Sec.) (A-F) (Sec.) (A-F) (Sec.) (A-F) (Sec.) w/o Project A 4.3 B 5.7 n/a n/a A 2.6 w/Project A 4.3 B 6.5 n/a n/a A 2.9 EB WB NB SB Burnett Avenue N & N 30th Street LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay All Way STOP Control (A-F) (Sec.) (A-F) (Sec.) (A-F) (Sec.) (A-F) (Sec.) w/o Project A 1.2 A 2.2 A 2.7 A 1.5 w/Project A 1.2 A 2.3 A 3.2 A 1.6 It should be noted that the additional trips added to the study area intersection are very small when computed as a total of the 1999 intersection entering volume. The percentage impact is listed in Table 5. V. Site Access Access will be provided via an internal road system that accesses Burnett Avenue N and N 26th Street. This internal road will also have two cul-de-sacs to provide access for the interior lots. Entering sight distance measurements were gathered for the intersection of the site roadway (N 27th Street) with Burnett Avenue N. The results of these field measurements are summarized in Table 4 below. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 6 Labrador Subdivision TIA September 15, 1998 Table 4 Intersection Entering Sight Distance Measurements Direction Sight Distance Comments To the North 250' Limited by Vertical Curve To the South 370' Limited by Cut Slope on east side of Burnett Ave N The AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets Fig IX-27 (copy in Appendix) at 25 MPH calls for an entering sight distance for entering turns of 330 feet.The intersection with the existing Burnett Avenue N does not fully meet this standard,having a sight distance to the north of 250', which is a compliance of approximately 76'. An advance intersection warning sign could be installed to alert SB traffic of the situation. It should be noted that the existing N 28`h Street intersection which is located only about 15 feet from the proposed intersection currently has the same entering sight distance without apparent safety problems. In addition,it should be noted that if Burnett Avenue N is realigned to curve following the west boundary of the subdivision(as requested by the City),the intersection entering sight distance will be reduced significantly. Major grading and establishment of a sight distance easement on Lot 1 could correct this. Finallyit should be noted that the stopping sight distance for traffic on Burnett is only about 150'.That is, for 25 mph traffic it is possible to see and stop for an object even as small as 6" high in the road in a distance of 150'. Since automobiles are 4.5' high it will be equally possible to stop for-entering traffic conflicts that they may encounter. VI. Mitigation The construction of the Labrador Subdivision results in small increases in traffic volume which result in minor increases in intersection overall delay. The study area intersections are impacted with roughly a 7% increase in volume as shown in Table 5. Since these intersections operate at very well both before and after the addition of the project generated traffic,no mitigation for impacts are required. Table 5 Site Generated Trip Percentage of Total Trips TRANSP( Page 7 Labrador Subdivision TIA September 15, 1998 The developer should offer to pay the traffic mitigation fees established by the City of Renton. This fee is established at$75.00 per average weekday trip. Using ITE trip generation data of 9.57 trips per dwelling unit, this 63 lot development will generate 603 trips on an average weekday. A copy of the relevant page from ITE Trip Generation is included in the Appendix. Accordingly, the traffic mitigation fee will be$45,225.00. • Since the entering sight distance does not meet AASHTO Standards at the site intersections onto • Burnett Avenue N, the City may wish to require the development to install advance W2-2 intersection warning signs to alert approaching traffic to the situation. This would involve installing a total of two warning signs, one for NB traffic and the other facing SB traffic. The City may wish to condition the development to grade Lot 1 and establish a sight distance easement on Lot 1 to create and maintain adequate intersection sight distance. However, if Burnett Avenue N is not required to be realigned to curve along the property boundary, then the sight distance issue will not be as severe and will likely not require mitigation. • TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 8 FIGURES TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 9 A § 0 0 N 626 ?_,rx;.12'".� z t l;{ 34TH a ST . %' Y - N 'r t- < a sF p _ 90TH ST - .� z 33RD PL t,,g M�„ g ac �•a,« � $E 91ST ST I SE �� � N 33RD ST F� :� Aa 11000 5 2N0 _ _ ...I� 1 : I J;7At Q� t 1 _ i 1 3 ib.� � 7IIt �.1f1 It o;; N 31ST ST, NE 31ST ! E a '� m � 31 2.000 5/98 of 5.000 7197 , -` ut$c.'�a' ,Ry.l .2''1 ` ' SE I i�700 N 29TH ST .noo ( `° .-r �, ,` MA * t N f N 20 281 °rez .. 628 i� Lt NE 28TH ST_ iV�t, t fir, 5c ti ° . ST . NE fi NE 27TH ST `x ' 1 I SITE 1 2Ipa =(. ` { � • a Al* il,z4ti , ' S Dt z , KEA8vril4 E z Ng 1 ST 1. _: _ _-__ 24TH 1 w car a ` —.. IY --,� I70o -6 Z. NE 23R0 pE '0 ` , y . i„. 23Ra S1 22ND _ 2_100 {;; 1 `z NE 21ST _ Q 22ND ST • STs c21 ? , N2. NE 20TH _ = 2300 It z a Vir i - x t 4 16.5T tl NI(fUl f - - - - h- - ?a� iet rr ST >� :‘N _. a 0 LEGEND xxxx aoo x,xxx Average Weekday Traffic Volume aoo Date of Data TRANSPORTATION Figure 1 Labrador Subdivision ('ONSI'LTIN(: o R T ti Ns' e s r Site Vicinity Labrador L.L.C. I z ''� PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE_ NW 1/4 OF SEC 5, TWN 23 N., R• 5 E. W.M. _— o — f ay • —_ x to...._ I 1�� t> 6• N 28TH PL SCALE 1"=60" • 3 Z __ i.L yo. 7 Naaor.a w I tnaao I _ _ _ HI.N '�8TH ST Cr) �- 87 .62-1'f -I 1 1 1 11- I'F n f- f1-1{' - I \ ',:%_ \a\ at 60 ;1 59 -'>6 ,F;; 56 55 51. 5J 521 jf�50 49 7 c.. •� v rd \� \ . .fit, /`1 17, i'! Ni....1i, 13 _ 1..,. ,,. > i \s.+ \ \`J1 _.1i__JLJ1_JLJLJLJ�_I _1 I x \ V L__,_, ' 4\ \ 3 I I IS 16 v,a 16 n Is d 20 il sr Ij 22 j'�j8 1 45 I \I ` �" J L_.J �_J JL=JLJR J J sl, CI ,� . / • \ . 1 L.. LI: •.I r ! ! �• - 11 • r% =`-i J L 1J 42 _ -. / . I I atr>,- / \ (- \\ \ 4 rs.v. e 14 '' / /2< \ l\n.c ; r \ ' _ . iS / . ...a • 'OI- �•• -I '11 \ I - t /s « fi o.K-, ,- --tr ‹. , -• • / ,✓ /- ,,.+.. ` C -N /� Y_ - i l! .� \ 'S t -'.\r.\G•.;.'.\• -/-.L \ 6rn7's6•w 77a72' I,.S i _ _-� r 1.- /-` f` . -t ` `. , :�. .. ...,-sue_, \ .• n( ---� -? I r, �-� , AJy(�� \ 6 11'1 / p `'\ \ \\ \• \.1 / \ .r33 �ny..w ^�;•� :, 56sw'.6'r -ls5'o \ ew \` 1/� dab \ \ —�• F �,: •` • a5 \\\ \s : /+' \ .----....:::_-_,!"---__ --....1 _ �- ''11t `\ 1' te-- \ r-i� .1'. : • !t,-_ ,. F— -4 . \ \\\ \ Q) \ y z: . i- �-' --i. \ \. O PLAT DATA tJ _ __ -- \ \ \�i DEVELOPER/OWNERS - I 0+ '•'- `Sfi \ \ PL jy;t TI H-e.AREA1ca �stiPACIP / \ \ \ p ;; ,_,� .:fi t :1 .,O,r. I Cr CI. =I.Y .=_-nw__ fA,. \ w-s ZONE uT+:"t n.mrs I I O - _ \ \ AND SURVEYOR a-.zone ono, .a -:so...wts �+ _ �ts - 8-_ -}���{� M.xi. _ I __J� _-� - jam. ,�t{�eT _ _.Y.n *F-�.1 \\ \\ \\ 1,....V.,is •=re.snx.t 0.2 i-i At i M,09" _A.o",�cj".ccer I ., ~1�-.� C 3t((�}, F -1t _- Y \ \ \ MY✓X 1-.•S-1„-W., —,00• .t, •�w •t. LW%t,.t I ' • < J C A N 626 C �' t 3hTH < ST :y ��` • �� a SF A Q _ S 90TN ST �� ° z :N 33RD pl. 174 91ST y ST SE o�� ; t -, it N 33RD ' SI €�. ,� • � 2100(? � 1 ���`S�tdD 1p Q11Si R 25 r7 y, I � � i � .�-� �SE � ri , 4' 8a a 17 r• "� N 32ND ST x R� t' 4:1N ,3- . 1b a4� 3zen V 700 H 31ST ST b 4w NE 31ST 'ST �'a I �tDN � `�7 r "P ` - 3 �, ST4 j s SE 9' ` 700 ■ k300 a �'` tlt4�` s —�: \1 N 29TN ST n1 i ` � �. r 'R zt'` ' , x �� •,` N 28TH rPL < s NE — 8TH sT_ �v� �f s sT x �,: , C x f E z7TH ST ` �� ` �' xa $` ';''Ni u �1. SITE > ' ET 210o xl � -�` � y�, r ; ▪&▪ r _.,.~�i _ t w w pL a x YQa F —; -�7}1 ST �„ yTr . �d �'� � -4i�� "FF _Za�. .]J LL1 tV :�T � 't- S } : `.; r ,x} ..\. 1700 w . , �+$ Q NE RD P( J 4 41.: „ , ,"fir if d a H E ` , NE N .,! ">1 t ws. I S. 23RD S� 2�2Nd� 2rpp i �.� co> S N 22t� STs 5 � f LL- s a NE 21ST 5t L. 2t} . I r - .u4i.� 36l Y- "� •�z risi r o 20TN • sT __'mi P d b q 83 `r, 1y ..--NF • = 2390 PE 20 ?t S �� ' 188 a 118 ' N 1700 NE 1911E > P 191M S! {{ a� a i, Q -G a ARXurteRTH - t A,� _ ill 11Y1 ST c, � �,1� ( Q y�4r a�ae t 2` f 46 TRANSPORTATION Figure 3 Labrador Subdivision CONS l' L T I G 1999 PM Peak Hour w/o Project N O R T H I. F. S T Labrador L.L.C. & w/o Pipeline Projects A 626 , , t : : : ST I a s p 1Fi90TH5TsE z- ��� � � a � � SE 915T O N I'� ST "+ }�' 11000 t N 33RD �' �y/J1 ., 1 p d l}ti q 25 fl; `J • nP 1 �" 1 ti aQp 44 ; t _700 N 31ST ST I`° kt -°, NE 31ST = a 4 700 N 29TH' ST a x-- ( '+o 1{x Y p�4w.1 :x .• 1I` r ,ix } ` tom,.,\ N 28TH Pl. p , [ .c''' NE 28TH ST R :- ` �,' ST x ' NE '0' NE 27TH ST t § 1 - SITE 1 27TH u00 r ---� - , . - it 4 / �� SI t� a All�.F HE 25TH ST r �� ZdT1i � u.� cv i e d' t , a' • 11,t I I700 1 t 5 Q NE .. TPL r .i __ S� 22ND GOO r, 22N0 1 a pt 1.1..' i s NE ZIST x ' o Q ,f,:i �r','; ly. I w J �SI!Q cv ••ltf. I1S m - g. *ST �' 1� d b 4 91 ,�� 2(1Tk1 � 2300 NE 2ort1 � �� F 204 b a 135 i N 5 AII til'lp` 0 i1;JA ! y TRANSPORTATION Figure 4 Labrador Subdivision CONSULTING 1999 PM Peak Hour w/o Project N 00 I. r H IN . S r w/ Pipeline Projects Labrador L.L.C. . 1 A N. e,x • At Str 'In Nyft_t ST 33RD PL 91ST vST I SE 0 0 0(---- P'� N 33RD ST a 1I000 £x �592r a p r211.1 a •0 f F fit; : . l� a ti o op 12 i ( 700 N 31ST ST io I`, NE 31ST ''a e� a �1 ' t4 '� w* ex . 9: a.:. _ �.� J` ., 3,1 - �J , 1 t�C,7 '', w,�. r • SE A .,,. + �r 30% 45% I xi b' 1 ^a. a.° rv� Y ,t r ,,C,k{,;" a� —t VI. 70Ei N 29TH i na '. .-) '. ' .e rt.,:r` " � ,,, 4 50 �4�` S 7'1r �tii ` 10% 0 � . • V `h 28TH � NE �, � r � �� `� 1�' NE �. — NE 27TH ST i' r �' , SITE i 2 2/00 = L. ' ? W T �, � KFY1t4ES4 ( 5f w 2z JBY . jksrii T 4p t? 13 I 1 45%y " if '1 , ^}} ► 4V -24TH ST ' ui I • r ST CN fJ { SC t. 'ra 3 '. i 4 1700 w ¢ NE R PL k a ''to 'I s"� ,h ` 23R1) S'S 22ND 2�00 .4,1- .�. � 'ti,, r; �. cr3y W a ST Nd 22ND ST i rr �� �. �? NE 2157 SST [ �' Q xx-- �a zis ten • , t 2 g ST t o p ti q .M 4 ' _ NE 2°TN w'2300 tc 20t� s ; ce# 4 1a i s1 i -. -- 0b a : t lk ME1911E P t N£,19 ST 17 • #4.• r ��i �' Z .t = 0 S 181'1t ST i t L 1 , ; i p .r-a?-4. 4ip fi i}r g :.,..,." ,n (\t - . pWC - -*, 40 tfiiH , Via- - TRANSPORTATION Figure 5 Labrador Subdivision CO\S[ LTLN (; o R -r 1? w' Ei s r Peak Hour Site Generated Trips Labrador L.L.C. I A 626 , .42 w. ,t 34TH. d`.. ST i x �`.n a J; " ,a F' 1:17-"'..-• Sr 90TH ST} z ,'N 3RD .PLC`.c sE �; / • SE 91ST ST tt Co N f£ r N 33ND ST " E .. i : -0 110D0 r'- i cy,`".0i gab f �- aa a25 - i , d N 32ND -- ' „07 J 1 b 4 Q�' 4' ss ' / 7� N . ' ST k) „k t° NE 31ST ST +<. , q ' `.rV A Y . r.* x Plrb SEA 9 -�( 1 �,:ST I a xa� ; __...........„yt 700 t, 29TH S . ,,,1, ( .` ,' • t ,, y'�� g N 28TH PL . groF ' , 1 NE 1 , � ,tv,, ST NE y. NE 27TH ST '` SITEN ;1".,,4 ; 27TH `� 2I00 �? �xx b q 7 e� '�` 2blN 5TN 17Eiii w r' • w z KEMiY/14 F ST 13 ' �� = :Y > i CIOAtS a 4 / ; 24TH ST n ! w c`ry d �e T ,. t_ CA N r' 11700 + a s RQ PL + 23RD S'� �22fA . �2�D0 's� ai 7.-_ 22ND ST 4 T `il ,�,Z L.. -.a NE 21S- a zQQ 1, W.� 'y1+7- X •'if. 215T.: .` 1 1 ST 4 tit s b R 109 - . NE 20TH L. 2300 t 20 5 204 b a 135 :� 1700►c 19TH PL Q 4 { I4 ST i NV " k ,. w 2 NE; IsrH NE. E 18 ST t1L ti ,. -c , TRANSPORTATION Figure 6 Labrador Subdivision C O N S l' L T ING 1999 PM Peak Hour w/Project Labrador L.L.C. N O R T H W E S T &w/Pipeline Projects TECHNICAL APPENDIX TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING NORTHWEST Page 16 Single-Family Detached Housing (210) • Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 348 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 198 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.57 4.31 - 21.85 3.69 Data Plot and Equation 30,000 X c 20,000— a X U_ X cu X 10,000 — X X d' X .�.f x 'P X 0 I l 0 1000 2000 3000 X= Number of Dwelling Units %< Actual Data Points Fitted Curve - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T)=0.920 Ln(X)+2.707 R2=0.96 Trip Generation.6th Edition 263 Institute of Transportation Engineers Single-Family Detached Housing (21 0) , . Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, .., Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. . . Number of Studies: 294 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 216 Directional Distribution: 64% entering, 36% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit i Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.01 0.42 - 2.98 1.05 • Data Plot and Equation 3,000 X X , ; co ,, i 'a c 2,000 !, til ra •L-_- , • , CD , , -5 i CD . --C • • ' > . 0 ,' . 01 X • ,' , . W , • <> X X , II 1,000 X i • X . . • X ,",,,, . ' ,•;.' • X ei, ' • X *A' .s , *..,1444.; . •e•e*:'4 , 0 0 1000 2000 3000 X=Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T)= 0.901 Ln(X)+0.527 R2=0.91 • Trip Generation,6th Edition 265 Institute of Transportation Engineers Labrador Subdivision Trip Generation Trip Generation by Percentage -- 64 1Trips % Enter'; Exit Total' % Enter Exit I Total 64% 36% 100% 64% 36% 100% 1,�23, 64 . 4... .��, ,r z,rk to , 41 `` 23 .64 1 0 0 1 51 21 12 32 2 1 0 1 52 21 12 33 3 1 1 2• 53 22 12 34 4 2 1 3 54 22 12 34 5 2 1 3 55 22 13 35 6 2 1 4 56 23 13 36 7 3 2' 4 57 23 13 36 8 3 2 5 58 24 13 37 9 4 2 6 59 24 14 38 • 10 4 2 6 60 24 14 38 11 4 3 7 61 25 14 39 12 5 3 8 62 25 14 39 13 5 3 8 63 26 14 40 14 6 3 9 64 26 15 41 15 6 3 10 65 26 15 41 16 7 4 10 66 27 15 42 17 7 4 11 67 27 15 43 18 7, 4 11 68 28 16 43 19 8 4 12 69 28 16 44 20 8 5 13 70 29 16 45 21 9 5 13 71 29 16 45 22 9 5 14 72 29 16 46 23 9 5 15 73 30 17 46 24 10 - 5 15 74 30 17 47 25 10 6 16 75 31 17 48 26 11 6 17 76 31 17 48 27 11 6 17 77 31 18 49 28 11 6 18 78 32 18 50 29 12 7 18 79 32 18 50 30 12 7 19 1 80 33 18 51 31 131 7 20' 81 33 19 52 32 131 7 20 82 33 19 52 33 13 8 21 83 341 19 53 34 14 8 22 84 341 19 53 35 14 8 22 85 35; 19 54 36 15 8 23 86 35; 20 55 37 15, 8 24 I 87! 35' 20 55 38 15' 9 24 88 361 20 56 39 16 9 25 I 89 36' 20 57 40 16 9 25 90 37 21 57 41 17 9' 26 91 371 21 58 42 17 10 27 92 371 21 59 43; 18 101 27 931 38, 21 59 441 18 101 281 ; 941 38! 22 60 45 18 101 291 95 39; 221 60• 46 19 111 29 96 391 22. 61 47 19 111 30 97 40 22 62 48 20 111; 31 981 40, 22' 62 49' 20' 111 31 I 991 40'. 23 63 50' 20 11; 32; 100; 41 231 64 • Frbm : TRAFFICOUNT PHONE No. : 206 491 1079 Sep. 14 1990 1: 19PM P05 TRAFFICOUNT PACE: 1 • Site Code : RENTON, WA. FILE: TN2528MP . DURNETT AVENUE N. • DATE: 9109f90 N. 307fl STREETMovements by: Primary PM PERIOD ANALYSIS POR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK DR VOLUMES PERCENTS • FROM PEAK NOIIR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left North 4:15 PM 0.17 2 0 11 45 62 _ 34 23 44 Ba6t 4:45 PM 0.05 0 24 16 31 71 South 4:45 PM 0.83 0 40 35 1 16 - 53 46 1 West 5:00 PM 0.69 n 1 9 1 11 - 9 02 9 Entire Intersection North 4:15 PM 0.19 2 0 26 31 51 - 39 46 51 44 East 0.85 0 24 16 31 71 South A.83 0 40 35 1 16 53 46 1 Neat 0.63 0 1 8 1 10 10 80 10 BURNETT AVENUE N_ ';"z} b<:i O{J h: l ; . fir.'::.( � c,Y!? rzi cum,:-. .,: arc w ' ` [TRUCK) 2 0 ;-v _ Ab w U [TRUCK] nv •::Irv..+�i'}S•.......... :����t7:::•-• }�llG).o �.is rco>. •>7•:>):. 4 4.: 71 / �7 �::•: N. 30TH STREET 1 - 1 L ,- 3 2._ .___... . 8' 1 . j..1 .4 iViii 1/ l 76 r x ,-•,,«.v,,.) «->;�,, ., 1' 0 [TRUCK) [TRUCK) 'Yn ; ;;1,i, ,,e,W-.x> < : ; . . , s , ,,,,1Wit:. 42 3 (C. wm '': BURNETT AVENUE N. ,.„2„::: C4 I I 57Z P- XX = 49 T t = (9?7 • I-r-Om : TRAFFICOUNT PHONE No. : 206 491 1079 Sep. 14 1998 1: 18PM P03 TRRENOT PAGE: Site Code : RENTON, WA. PILE: TN25780P BURNETT AVENUE N. LAMB HASkIINGTON BOULEVARD Movements by: Prioiary DATE: 9/09/98 PRAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES PERCENTS FROM PEAK ROUE FACTOR TRUCK Right Thru Left Total TRUCK Right Thru Left North 4:15 PM OM 0 1 0 46 47 - 2 0 98 tact 4:45 PM U.90 0 83 111 0 194 - 41 50 0 South 4:45 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 99 1 Vest 4:00 PM 0.91 0 0 114 1 115 Entire Intersection • North 4:15 PH 0.84 0 1 0 46 47 - 2 0 98 BaSt 0.89 0 00 113 0 193 - 40 S0 0 South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 West 0,85 0 0 162 1 163 - 0 99 1 ��79 I BURNETT AVENUE $1f1" N ::<v' ' 3.' :Y•-�' i�'i' is (`: g-3- y� TAT?• �J::.'.i AA{/� vt..y:` r��.� T1 �•,•:A t 1. f wiiii [TRUCK] 0 1 U �-e-- > * f>s'r: ;=;�•> ;<•_s,;:s; 0 TRUCK] T ' ''3 ft •: l�� ?�-> LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 193 / /107 1' 0 1 • i6g — 163 LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD I} ',,'; ;;: 0 i ';-....;5-.,..,—..,,y;,,,,,, ::•5M.:.:2:?.-.',i.?0;;;;.:44!:,,,;.. [TRUCK] 0 us.<<; . 0 0 0 0 [TRUCK] 3E -(`''Tti BURN1.TT AVENUE N- R Xx i )71-( = l q? 9 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d BUR1N.HCO Page 1 Transportation Consulting Northwest ' 1607 E . Main Street Auburn, WA 98002-2083 Ph: (206) 931-0506 Streets : (N-S) Burnett Avenue N (E-W) Lk Washington Blvd N Analyst T.Miller Date of Analysis 9/15/98 Other Information 1999 PM Pk w/o Project All-way Stop-controlled Intersection • Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 1 204 0 0 135 91 0 0 0 60 0 1 PHF .85 .85 . 85 . 89 . 89 . 89 .95 .95 . 95 . 84 . 84 . 84 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 1 0 71 RT Flow Rate 0 102 1 Approach Flow Rate 241 254 72 Proportion LT, 0 .00 0 . 00 0 . 99 Proportion RT 0 .00 0 .40 0 . 01 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 254 241 0 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 72 72 495 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.43 0 .45 0 . 13 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 .45 0 .43 0 . 00 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 0 1 0 RT, Opposing Approach 102 0 0 LT, Conflicting Approaches 71 71 1 RT, Conflicting Approaches 1 1 102 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0 .40 0 . 00 0 . 00 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0 .99 0 .99 0 . 00 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 .01 0 . 01 0 . 21 Approach Capacity 627 553 288 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 241 627 0 . 38 4 .3 A WB 254 553 0 .46 5 . 7 B SB 72 288 0 . 25 2 . 6 A Intersection Delay = 4 . 7 Level of Service (Intersection) = A HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d BURIP.HCO Page 1 Transportation Consulting Northwest 1607 E . Main Street Auburn, WA 98002-2083 Ph: (206) 931-0506 Streets : (N-S) Burnett Avenue N (E-W) Lk Washington Blvd N Analyst T.Miller Date of Analysis 9/15/98 Other Information 1999 PM Pk w/ Project All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 5 204 0 0 135 109 0 0 0 70 0 3 PHF . 85 . 85 .85 .89 . 89 . 89 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 84 . 84 . 84 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet Ep WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 6 0 83 RT Flow Rate 0 122 4 Approach Flow Rate 246 274 87 Proportion LT, 0 . 02 0 .00 0 . 95 Proportion• RT -0 .00 0 .45 0 . 05 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 274 246 0 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 87 87 520 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0 .41 0 .45 0 . 14 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 .45 0 .41 0 . 00 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 0 6 0 RT, Opposing Approach 122 0 0 LT, Conflicting Approaches 83 83 6 Rr, Conflicting Approaches 4 4 122 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0 . 00 0 .02 0 . 00 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0 .45 0 .00 0 . 00 . Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0 . 95 0 . 95 0 . 01 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 .05 0 .05 0 . 23 Approach Capacity 638 555 310 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 246 638 0 . 39 4 . 3 A WB 274 555 0 .49 6 . 5 B SB 87 310 0 . 28 2 . 9 A Intersection Delay = 5 . 1 Level of Service ( Intersection) = B - .HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d BUR2P.HCO Page 1 Transportation Consulting Northwest 1607 E . Main Street Auburn, WA 98002-2083 Ph: (206) 931-0506 Streets : (N-S) Burnett Avenue N (E-W) New Street Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst T.Miller Date of Analysis 9/15/98 • Other Information 1999 w/ Project Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- --No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 0 0 0 0 > 1 < 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 91 22 12 61 13 0 7 PHF .88 . 88 . 84 . 84 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 3 -3 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (s) CV' s (%) PCE' s 0 . 95 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 • Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver - Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 .50 2 .60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 .50 3 .40 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d BUR2P.HCO Page 2 • Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 116 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1209 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1209 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 128 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1490 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1490 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 .99 Step 3 : TH from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 202 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 855 Capacity Adjustment Factor due tpTImpeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement, Capacity: (pcph) 847 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 202 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 809 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 802 , • HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 .1d BUR2P.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 15 802 > WB T 0 847 > 908 4 .1 0 . 0 A 4 .1 WB R 8 1209 > SB L 13 1490 2 .4 0 . 0 A 0 .4 Intersection Delay = 0 .5 sec/veh .HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d BUR3N.HCO Page 1 Transportation Consulting Northwest • 1607 E. Main Street Auburn, WA 98002-2083 Ph: (206) 931-0506 Streets : (N-S) Burnett Avenue N (E-W) N 30th Street Analyst T.Miller Date of Analysis 9/15/98 Other Information 1999 w/o Project All-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 1 8 1 44 17 25 1 36 50 32 27 0 PHF . 63 .63 . 63 . 85 . 85 . 85 .83 .83 .83 . 79 . 79 . 79 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 2 52 1 41 RT Flow Rate 2 29 60 0 Approach Flow Rate 17 101 104 75 Proportion LT 0 . 12 0 .51 0 .01 0 . 55 Proportion RT 0 .12 0 .29 0 .58 0 . 00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 101 17 75 104 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 179 179 118 118 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0 . 06 0 .34 0 .35 0 .25 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 .34 0 .06 0 .25 0 .35 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 52 2 41 1 RT, Opposing Approach 29 2 0 60 LT, Conflicting Approaches 42 42 54 54 RT, Conflicting Approaches 60 60 31 31 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0 .51 0 .12 0 .55 0 . 01 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0 .29 0 . 12 0 .00 0 .58 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0 .23 0 .23 0 .46 0 .46 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 .34 0 .34 0 .26 0 .26 Approach Capacity 328 499 404 652 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 17 328 0 . 05 1 .2 A WB 101 499 0 .20 2 .2 A NB 104 404 0 .26 2 . 7 A SB 75 652 0 . 12 1 . 5 A Intersection Delay = 2 . 1 Level of Service (Intersection) = A • • . +HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1d BUR3P.HCO Page 1 , Transportation Consulting Northwest ` 1607 E. Main Street Auburn, -WA -980-02-2083 Ph: (206) 931-0506 Streets: (N-S) Burnett Avenue N (E-W) N 30th Street Analyst T.Miller Date of Analysis 9/15/98 Other Information 1999 w/ Project All-way Stop-controlled Intersection • Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 1 8 1 56 17 25 1 36 57 32 27 0 PHF .63 .63 .63 .85 .85 . 85 .83 .83 .83 .79 . 79 _79 Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet EB WB NB SB LT Flow Rate 2 66 1 41 RT Flow Rate 2 29 69 0 Approach Flow Rate 17 115 113 75 Proportion LT, 0 .12 0 .57 0 . 01 0 .55 Proportion RT 0 .12 0 .25 0 .61 0 .-00 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 115 17 75 113 Cpnflic-ting Approaches Flow Rate 188 188 132 132 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0 . 05 0 .36 0 .35 0 .23 Proportion, - Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0 .36 0 .05 0 .23 0 .35 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 66 2 41 1 RT, Opposing Approach 29 2 0 69 LT, Conflicting Approaches 42 42 68 68 RT, Conflicting Approaches 69 69 31 31 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0 .57 0 . 12 0 .55 0 . 01 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0 .25 0 . 12 0 .00 0 . 61 . Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0 .22 0 .22 0 .52 0 . 52 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0 . 37 0 . 37 0 .23 0 . 23 Approach Capacity 326 528 369 617 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS EB 17 326 0 . 05 1 .2 A WB 115 528 0.22 2 .3 A 1\43 113 369 0.31 3.2 A SB 75 617 0 . 12 1 . 6 A Intersection Delay = 2 .4 Level of Service (Intersection) = A 70 I '_� J �l A- SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE CROSSING 2-LANE v /�'1 / HIGHWAY • FROM STOP. (SEE DIAGRAM) ‘.p N.)W / B-I-SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE TURNING LEFT 65 1- /ng•. t""-'-- - _. - t— INTO 2-LANE HIGHWAY ACROSS P VEHICLE APPROACHING / 4, FROM LEFT. (SEE DIAGRAM) Z 60 _..1._ __._. _ '_ ,( - --___...._ �- �_.. .-.y_ ._ . ..--i 4 B-2o-SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE TO TURN LEFT I I INTO 2-LANE HIGHWAY AND ATTAIN DESIGN SPEED .1. I WITHOUT BEING OVERTAKEN BY A VEHICLE APPROACHING • / FROM THE RIGHT AND MAINTAINING DESIGN SPEED. O / B-2b-SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE TO TURN LEFT / Oo INTO 2-LANE HIGHWAY AND ATTAIN AVERAGE RUNNING = 00 SPEED WITHOUT BEING OVERTAKEN BY VEHICLE Col 50 .— - f3{{I L`•0 0" --+ -----? -'--"t-' APPROACHING FROM THE RIGHT REDUCING SPEED FROM ,itJ/ / 0 DESIGN SPEED TO AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED.(SEE y ! / ,L'o DIAGRAM) a 45 I t/ / Co-SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE TO P VEHICLE TO TURN RIGHT N INTO A 2-LANE HIGHWAY AND ATTAIN DESIGN WITHOUT C 43/ BEING OVERTAKEN BY A P VEHICLE APPOACHING FROM to 40 --� ---}-� -------- --- - ... � ( THE LEFT TRAVELING AT DESIGN SPEED. Cb-SAFE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR P VEHICLE TO TURN RIGHT h ,/ INTO 2•LANE HIGHWAY AND ATTAIN AVERAGE RUNNING �. - SPEED WITHOUT BEING OVERTAKEN BY VEHICLE 35 APPROACHING FROM THE LEFT AND REDUCING FROM DESIGN SPEED TO AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. CO ^• I I J 25 • 1 ;/ I 0 ?CO 400 600 BOO 1000 1200 1400 1600 1000 2000 2200 2400 2600 A SIGHT DISTANCE (FEET) A A A. Figure IX-27. Intersection sight distance at at-grade intersection (case IIIB and case IIIC). o - t4 // . • • A is.